FLD2011-03013; 1411 FT HARRISON AVE N; THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER.•
FLD2011m03013
1411 N FT HARRISON AVE
Date Received: 3/1/201112:15:30 PM
The Community Learning Center
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial
LAND USE: Commercial General
ATLAS PAGE: 268B
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: June 21, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-03013
Agenda Item: D.3.
Owner/Applicant: The Community Learning Center, Inc.
Address: 1411 N. Fort Harrison Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a Social/Public Service
Agency in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 46,574
square feet, a lot width of 226 feet (along N. Fort Harrison Avenue)
and 116 feet (along Garden Avenue), a building height of 27 feet, a
front (west) setback of 36.6 feet (to existing building) and 5.15 feet (to
existing pavement), a front (east) setback of 119.3 feet (to existing
building) and 2.8 feet (to existing pavement), a side (north A) setback
of 102 feet (to existing building) and 3.5 feet (to existing pavement), a
side (north B) setback of 3.2 feet (to existing pavement), a side (south)
setback of 34.9 feet (to existing building) and two feet (to existing
pavement), a rear (east) setback of 54 feet (to existing building) and
six feet (to existing pavement), and 35 parking spaces as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-704.C.,as well as a
reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along N. Fort Harrison
Avenue from 15 feet to 5.15 feet, a reduction to the perimeter
landscape buffer along Garden Avenue from 10 feet to 2.8 feet, a
reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along the side (south) from
five feet to two feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer
along the side (north A) from five feet to 3.5 feet, and reductions to
the foundation landscape requirement on the front (west) facade from
five feet to two feet and the front (east) facade from five feet to zero
feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial (C) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant
Proposed: Social/Public Service Agency
EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District Warehouse / Retail Sales and
SURROUNDING Services
ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District Offices and Attached Dwellings
East: Institutional (I) District Vacant Land
West: Commercial (C) District Attached Dwellings
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 -Page 1
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.06 acre property is located between N. Fort Harrison Avenue and Garden Avenue
approximately 50 feet south of Marshall Street. The subject area of N. Fort Harrison Avenue is
commercial in character with retail sales and services, offices, warehousing and some residential
uses located in the vicinity. Most of the structures in the immediate vicinity are in fair to poor
condition. The property comprises two parcels and has 226 feet of frontage on N. Fort Harrison
Avenue and 116 feet along Garden Avenue. The Garden Avenue frontage has an existing six foot
high masonry wall that was permitted and constructed in 2007. The property has two
ingress/egress areas located on N. Fort Harrison Avenue and contains two front setbacks, three
side setbacks and one rear setback.
The surrounding properties include a warehouse and retail sales and services located to the north,
offices and attached dwellings to the south, vacant institutionally zoned land to the east and
attached dwellings to the west. The subject property is currently vacant and contains a 7,000
square foot structure which originally housed a restaurant (Bill Irle Restaurant). The Community
Learning Center purchased the subject property in 2007 and it has never been occupied. While
the facade of the building has recently been updated, the site is currently overgrown and in need
of maintenance.
Development Proposal:
On March 1, 2011, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application was submitted for the
subject property. The application proposes to establish a social/public service agency in the
existing building. The Commercial (C) District only provides for this proposed use through the
Flexible Development approval process.
The proposed social/public service agency is The Community Learning Center. The Community
Learning Center is an educational resource center for families in the Clearwater area which
provides tutoring to children through the No Child Left Behind Program. Additionally, World
Literacy Crusade, which is an affiliate of The Community Learning Center, will occupy space in
the building. World Literacy Crusade will train staff from 26 community groups in curriculum
for remedial education, study skills improvement, drug handling and prevention and character
building skills. The Community Learning Center is currently located at 1611 N. Fort Harrison
Avenue and provides tutoring for mainly younger children. The new facility will expand to
include the uses discussed above. Regarding the existing - structure, the--.recent -facade
improvements include columns, railings, new stucco, and distinctive window patterns: The red
clay tile roof is complemented by recent painting with warm beige and white paint.
Regarding the site, 24 parking spaces are being removed to provide for interior landscape islands
and a recreation area. The parking lot will be restriped and comply with ADA requirements. The
parking lot setbacks to pavement are as follows: a front (west) setback of 5.15 feet, a front (east)
setback of 2.8 feet, a side (north A) setback of 3.5 feet, a side (north B) setback of 3.2 feet, a
side, (south) setback of two feet and a rear (east) setback of six feet. The development proposal's
compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community Development Code
(CDC) is discussed below.
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 - Page 2
Intensity: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum
allowable intensity is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.55. The proposal is in compliance with the
above as it has a FAR of 0.15.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
701.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.90 for CG. The overall proposed ISR is 0.70, which is
consistent with the above.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for social/public service agencies ranges from
5,000 - 10,000 square feet. The subject property is 46,574 square feet (1.06 acres). Also for
comparative purposes, the minimum lot width requirement for social/public service agencies
ranges from 50 - 100 feet in width. The lot width along N. Fort Harrison Avenue is 226 feet and
along Garden Avenue it is 116 feet. Both the lot size and lot width are consistent with the above.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum front setback requirement for social public service agencies can range between 15 and
25 feet, the minimum side setbacks can range between 0 - 10 feet and the rear setback can range
between 10 - 20 feet.
With regard to the existing building, the minimum required setbacks are all being greatly
exceeded; however flexibility has been requested with regard to the setbacks to the off-street
parking and vehicular use areas. The request includes a front (west) setback of 5.15 feet, a front
(east) setback of 2.8 feet, a side (north A) setback of 3.5 feet, a side (north B) setback of 3.2 feet,
a side, (south) setback of two feet and a rear (east) setback of six feet. The front (west) setback to
5.15 feet is to an existing drive aisle. Both the front (east) setback, along Garden Avenue and
side (north A) setback are to existing pavement. While some of this pavement could be removed,
it would not be visible from Garden Avenue due to the existing six foot high masonry wall and
this area is planned to. be used as a recreation area for children between tutoring sessions. The
side (north B) setback of 3.2 feet, the side (south) setback of two feet and the rear (east) setback
of six feet are all to existing vehicular use and parking areas. Understanding this site was
developed in the early 1980's, Staff supports the existing setbacks to pavement.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum-allowable -
building height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the maximum building height for social/public service agencies can range between
25 and 50 feet. The proposed building height is 27 feet, well within the range based upon .the
above Code provisions.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum required parking for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking
requirement for social/public service agencies is 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor
area. As such, 35 parking spaces are required. The site currently has 59 parking spaces and this
proposal removes 24 spaces for both interior landscape islands and a recreation area, resulting in
35 parking spaces.
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 -Page 3
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles.
Solid Waste: The proposal includes the provision of a refuse dumpster located at the northwest
corner of the parking lot. The refuse area will be screened with stucco walls. The proposal has
been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utilities including individual distribution lines must
be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Any new electric and
communication lines for this development will be installed underground on site in compliance
with this requirement. All electric panels, boxes and meters will be painted the same color as the
building.
Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15-foot wide landscape
buffer along N. Fort Harrison Avenue, a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along Garden Avenue
and a five foot wide landscape buffer along all side and rear property boundaries. Along N. Fort
Harrison Avenue the landscape buffer width ranges from 5.15 feet to 11 feet and cannot be
increased without impacting the drive aisle. The landscape buffer width is only 2.8 feet in width
along Garden Avenue, but as stated previously, a six foot high masonry wall has been
constructed along Garden Avenue; thus, a wider landscape buffer would not be visible. The side
and rear landscape buffers range from two to six feet in width, with five feet as the width
requirement. While parking spaces are being removed, they do not allow for greater landscape
buffer widths, only increased interior islands. With regard to all the buffer widths, there is no
opportunity to increase the size without impacting drive aisles or the recreation area.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a
building faVade with frontage along a street right-of-way. The foundation plantings must be
within an area that is a minimum of five feet wide and consist of at.least two accent trees or three
palm trees for every 40 linear feet of building faVade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of
required landscape area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area.shall contain shrubs with the
remainder to be ground cover. The foundation plantings along the N. Fort Harrison Avenue
faVade range from zero to two feet in width. No foundation plantings have been proposed along
the Garden Avenue faVade as it would impact the drive aisle width, along with the fact that
foundation planting would not be visible due to the stucco walla
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the gross vehicular use area shall be
provided as landscape islands a minimum of eight feet wide and 150 square feet in size. The site
proposes 27.14 percent of the vehicular use areas to be landscape islands.
To mitigate for the deviations to the landscape buffer requirements along both fronts, sides and
rear the applicant has proposed larger accent and palm trees along with the additional 17.4
percent of the vehicular use area being planted with interior landscape islands. Over 30 trees and
1,400 shrubs/groundcover plants are proposed to be installed. Due to existing site constraints
staff supports the requested landscape reductions.
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 - Page 4
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of N/A N/A
the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel
proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed X
in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than
landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the
minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor
plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the
narcel nronosed for develonment is located.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704:
Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.55 0.19 X
I.S.R. 0.90 (CG) 0.70 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 46,574 square feet (1.06 acres) X1
Minimum Lot Width N/A N. Fort Harrison 226 feet X1
Garden 116 feet
Maximum Height N/A 27 feet X`
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A N. Fort Harrison: 36.6 feet (to building) XI
5.1 feet (to pavement)
Garden: 119.3 feet((to building) X'
2.8 feet (to pavement)
Side: N/A North A: 102 feet (to building) Xl
3.2 feet (to pavement)
North B: 3.2 feet (to pavement) X1
South: 34.9 feet (to building) X1
2 feet (to pavement)
Rear: N/A East: 54 feet (to building) X1
6 feet (to pavement)
Minimum Off-Street 5 spaces/1,000sf GFA 5 spaces/1,000sf GFA (35 parking spaces) X
Parkin (35 parking spaces)
1 See analysis in Staff Report.
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 -Page 5
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
704.C. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 - Page 6
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, x
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons x
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the x
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including x
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of April 7, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 1.06 acre property is located between N. Fort Harrison Avenue and Garden Avenue
approximately 50 feet south of Marshall Street;
2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial
General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The site currently contains a 7,000 square foot vacant structure;
4. The previous use was a restaurant;
5. The minimum required building setbacks are all being exceeded;
6. The proposal includes setback reductions to existing pavement;
7. The proposal includes reductions to the perimeter landscape buffer requirements;
8. The proposal includes 35 parking spaces;
9. The proposed building height is 27 feet; and
10. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-701.1 and.2-
704, Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
704.C., Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A., Community Development Code; and
4. The development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 3-1202.G.,
Community Development Code.
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 -Page 7
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit a Social/Public Service Agency in the
Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 46,574 square feet, a lot width of 226 feet (along N.
Fort Harrison Avenue) and 116 feet (along Garden Avenue), a building height of 27 feet, a front
(west) setback of 36.6 feet (to existing building) and 5.15 feet (to existing pavement), a front
(east) setback of 119.3 feet (to existing building) and 2.8 feet (to existing pavement), a side
(north A) setback of 102 feet (to existing building) and 3.5 feet (to existing pavement), a side
(north B) setback of 3.2 feet (to existing pavement), a side (south) setback of 34.9 feet (to
existing building) and two feet (to existing pavement), a rear (east) setback of 54 feet (to existing
building) and six feet (to existing pavement), and 35 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-
704.C.,as well as a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along N. Fort Harrison Avenue
from 15 feet to 5.15 feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Garden Avenue
from 10 feet to 2.8 feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along the side (south) from
five feet to two feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along the side (north A) from
five feet to 3.5 feet, and reductions to the foundation landscape requirement on the front (west)
facade from five feet to two feet and the front (east) facade from five feet to zero feet as part of a
Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements and landscaping;
2. That prior to issuance of any permits a unity of title be submitted for parcels 09-25-15-
51192-000-0030 and 09-25-15-55530-000-0080;
3. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all of the proposed landscaping shall
be installed;
4. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the
buildings be painted the same color as the building; and
5. The prior to issuance of any permits, the landscape plans be revised to show curbs around all
interior landscape islands.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board - June 21, 2011
FLD2011-03013 -Page 8
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4553
scott.kurleman(a,myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, assist public customers at the Zoning Counter, the organization of data and
its display in order to track information and provide status reports and making presentations to
various City Boards and Committees.
Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports. Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign
Permits, Business Tax Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program
Applications.
Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City
land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure
that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition
in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy
Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the
installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring
that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for
structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private
properties.
Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. Groveland, Florida June 1993 to June 1996
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private
corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding
arboricultural techniques related to trees.
Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company, Clearwater, Florida June 1991 to June 1993
Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance.
Store Manager
William Natorp Company, Inc. Cincinnati Ohio June 1983 to June 1991
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams
of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance,
workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor
products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
GRADUATE -Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA,
TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA.
Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management
AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414
LEED Green Associate, Currently pursuing
MOTIVATIONAL Mentor Award, December 2010
0614 3
„ X614 115 2
232 '2
? 3
i
/ s so 8 742 8
^ +0
1
s.
,00.2
160
161 hp
in. 1 c'?1 t o 46%' 4 _ 1613 - 8 2 / `
W 60 °8169 17 18 1s 20 51
.
"
8 ! 761
z o n
2 y
-100 m ,oo „° m bas
zoo 1604 7
Q 4
9+ + o
M 720 22 23 24
8
a
W ?sz7 _ 8 ap o It 0 25 ?a o e '
m
°
6 ' °
6
1607 ,0 6 1607 • B?f? Q' 'sa 6
a 0
3 m
41
d 7o
z
n 2 Z
120 80 60 60 33.3
4
100
1611
- _ 8 2 =
1,411 p
,0
as
O
+ 0
I MINNESOTA m S 14
0
o
y.
o.5L7 ° h
'1809 2., O
V
15 1610 as Cl) I
160
750 59 r 59.3 6?51j47 '
'
I
m 29
4 ?
1609
cV
16 1600
1600 ^ 0 39
y 7 1
15
1 6 16
30
so
? z 28
ns „os
38
o 13
,1
31 s7 - 17 2
"s
o iF804
Y
1e
SSo
+°°
?'1A/?,98 so °°_1- 3 5 4 3 2 1
32 es3s WAREHOUSE a4
7 0 '
Q
23 19 700 ATTACHED DWELLIN
833
-
9 40
5y
0 50'* 50 55(5)
1
22
s
60335 934 1'1501 1ob: °u?s 109 7"911104
2t
1soJ
$ 1801 r-
MARSHALL 12438
9 _
100
lsoo
14 -s 9 11
N
os
13 1?(6) 50
50 ^ 50 Ch 5) ) )
m
m
"
m
_ _ RETAIL SALE
010 F m 1?Ig h
15 n IN 8'501
10 14 S m
m .
.
'?
B m y
3-
4 3 6
1 6 6
y ATTACHED 171.2 8 4 _
49 q
14 1 2 3
z0
5
170 - 33 30
_
11 DWELLINGS
a 3
- 70.6 3,
'
41m15 4
121 13 6 „ s rv r
e4.s
13
4 = y _ l4 14 51192 di, r
isss
1
_l
1* 130.3 3F
jl? 1 8 I
15 16
'
'
91
_
.7 717 5 4
m 1 1
l"
5 II
1,a
8256 m
_ _l°" 144b?z1i? 1 t
o '14 ! „6
1 3 2 1
?o r xl 5s 3 I X4
094
\
96.3 y1 . _ ) ^
tt 7 2 1486 OFFICES ANDATTACHED i19
3
-2
1 0i7 y (`(1,5 )J
I 1 °
2
?
0° 1405 z4
DWELLINGS
n `
/ X409
W
2 6
s
2
3 '
o
10 1 11 tt
J 141 11
8
"+ la y 7404
1401
30 5
•7s "s 3' QO 13
1402
y ?' m _
I a w 'Id03
1401A - 1 1 14018 o Q 10
_ q
1308
4
R y 1309 130 1401 9 141101 nz
^ 48 " 9 1120ss 1 1 qD X1121
39 1310 5 14
1
2 130s? _ m1 9 f _ 10 f$o 1412 s
1311 235(6) t CAR
.e 1305 410 Q 1 +30 ,42 s 15
3
3 46 Z 13 ?0 1304100
! 41 1304 07 2 X21 az(S)
I I - - - - - - - `6- s 13(19
19
[ j _ 2
7 - - - J`v 7104, 8
T
_ 19 130°
° 813
3
V p S 0 16 I 1
5
05
3s 3
1301 0 0 ?2 1302 zz 3 13 X9071
18 0
- m
rn
1317
Q) 4 1
ss.s 71 ?,°
4 Q 3 ass
43 130$ 0 4 ,zz ? ERMINEg !7 1 6 g
13 5? 4
Q
_L_ _ _ ?,
E 30 1303 m 17 s03. T
NGMAIV 1301 5 y _ - 210 so .r 3 141(s) a 13p5
1303 6
148304 '^ 1 P,o
s
U
,s
,3
724 '*217"
217 68 8 16 _ 26 25 24
12
a s
2
-
m 6130 Q g 7
?
U O m
H
Q •216 ^ so
a 59
m
S' `
^I
747(6) v t
_
m
810
zz
1215 67 ° s
STRE
60 12
?
1
1 o
130p 23ro1 19 76.E 4s s4?g goooi
18
ET
?t7? _ y
h 270 s0
11
1212 1 ENG
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: The Community Learning Center, Inc. Case: FLD201 1-0301 3
Site: 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.06 Acres
PIN: 09-29-15-51192-000-0030 Atlas Page: 2686
09-29-15-55530-000-0080
7608 1613 1612
7673 1614 7675 1625
162 A
1611
1610 1613 16,5 d d 71
2
?
1604
1671
1
, 1621
e
?^ Z
Q 160;'
6 1607 608
4
1606
1605 = 1611 MIN NESOTA DR 1106
1604 Dy 1603 CO 1609
1610 16
1609 ^ y a 6?5
1600
1601 1600 1605 1606
1604
Q l\
?
1601
MARSHg ?
16
o 1603 1604
LL Sr
o
'
00
1600
lsos p
b o b O N
b $ ?D to
1503 1503
7? ,tT 1504
1
1505
'R 1504 1601
1413 501
1414 1500
1415 1503
1 502
in n rn
?o co
1412 1412 1501 150
149
1415 149,6
5
1410 C10
1413
1411
^o
1406 1417 1408 1417
1409
b
O
1407112 1500
1407 1407 1409
1407 1406 7408
1408
1406
1405
1407
1405 1405 1405
1401 14
1404 1405 1403
1403
1308 1402 1401A 14018
1309 1401
1402 1403 1401
1310 7400
1309 7401
Q 1311
'O
1305 1308 V
1307
1304 >30g
Q
1
Q
1307 9
1308
1301 1305
1302 306
1304 1307 1305 v 1306 1307
1300
1303
ENE ST 1305
130
12 7
?`?
^ 1303
13
Q 4
17
1215 0
b' 1216 EN 0
O ?T
MqN ST b 02
y.?
//y
v
v
130
°
T
0 w o°
1214 1211
ZONING MAP
Owner: The Community Learning Center, Inc. Case: FLD201 1-03013
Site: 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.06 Acres
PIN: 09-29-15-51192-000-0030 Atlas Page: 2686
09-29-15-55530-000-0080
PROJECT
SITE
O,A
Z /
ST
O Z
? C
O BECKETT
TD
BEC,ETT ST W !
SHALL ST G
0
GRANT
F
_N
CARLTON x ST g? RUSSE
Z -Z' Q Z TAN GERINE
ENGMAN t= ST
rY
LA SALLE ST
Q PALM BLUFF
Z
a w
J Q
?I1 Z G
Z r i
L U)
METTO `
RGON hr ST
O ? N3CFIOLSON ST
QO
F--7 r-.--7 SEMINOLE ST
$NG7 dE w
SJ
d $1b O
V,
CC
LM $Lilr F ?O
S7 J
00
2 C PALM BLUFF ST
5°-ZZ=NG cb JURGENS ST
:3 DE= [??
CEDAR ST z:= S^
? J
I I Uj CALUMET
VENETIAN
z
Oso NOKOfAdS
LEBEAU
t
O IROgU OIS
Z PRINCESS 1
U) ? OSAGE
PLEASANT D _
MOHAV4'K
I:- CL
z s?sT CT 4
AIR rvr o d ¢ FAIRMONT
a =O?7
MINNE r?D)
N4LL?
MAR
O W
O0D
a
D
?+J
t
LOCATION MAP
Owner: The Community Learning Center, Inc. I Case
Site: 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size
PIN: 09-29-15-51 192-000-0030 Atlas Page
09-29-15-55530-000-0080
FLD201 1-0301 3
1.06 Acres
2686
"'...
cart 111
,
`? a•:y. :? r''r?tk ., C? . ?? f ? #i.. ..
4 ?.r
All
t
.
r
y {
'Ilk
;.>
1 .. t
7 1.
A
A' ` fY 'YlT
.-i w.. A 6 i r? . /7 ?? 4 ?,.jt 1, i T. ,?., , , , ! ` ,`+
? ?• ' ? _
?
J x +
r
e .l i/ r??v
AERIAL MAP
Owner: The Community Learning Center, Inc. Case: FLD201 1-0301 3
Site: 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.06 Acres
PIN: 09-29-15-51 192-000-0030 Atlas Page: 268B
09-29-15-55530-000-0080
? _IAM11r
Front (west) fagade of building
Six foot high stucco wall along Garden Avenue
1411 N. Ft. Harrison Ave.
FLD2011-03013
Page 1 of 1
Side (south) facade of building
Properties to the west (across N. Ft. Harrison Ave)
Side (north) fagade of building
Properties to the south of the subject site
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Flexible Development Application
FLD2011=30013
The Community Learning Center
1411 N. Ft. Harrison Av
Clearwater, FL 33755
WE ARE GROWING!
I N DEX TO DOW M ENTS
Flexible Development Application # FLD2011-03013 1411 N. Ft. Harrison Ave.
Exhibit A Reduced Color Site Plan
Exhibit B Emergency Vehicle Access Plan
Exhibit C Social Public Services within 1500'& Notes
Exhibit D Existing Building Photos
Exhibit E Existing Building Photos
Exhibit F Warranty Deed
Exhibit G Legal Description Lot 3: Warranty Deed's Exhibit A
Exhibit H Legal Description Lots 8 & 9:Warranty Deed's Exhibit B
Exhibit I Stormwater Narrative, Signed and Sealed & C3 & C4
Exhibit J SWFWMD Permit Exemption Documentation
Exhibit K Tree Survey & LS 1.1
Exhibit L Tree Inventory
Exhibit M Location Map
Exhibit N Comprehensive Landscape Program Application
Exhibit 0 Elevation Photos
0
LL Planning 11 Development CASE #:
Department h Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED (staff initials):
• o 100 Sout
DATE RECEIV VED:
Clearwater
• _ Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
• ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
• ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
• application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
• ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
• * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
• Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 05.04.2010)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
• APPLICANT NAME: The Community Learning Center, Inc
MAILING ADDRESS: 1611 N. Ft Harrison, Clearwater FL 33755 _
PHONE NUMBER: 727-441-4444 FAX NUMBER: 727-441-2721
- - -- - -- - --- - - -- --- - ---
• CELL NUMBER EMAIL: Info@tampayouth.org
• PROPERTY OWNER(S): The Community Learning Center, Inc
List ALL owners on the deed
• AGENT NAME: Dana Hanson
MAILING ADDRESS: 1611 N Ft Harrison, Clearwater FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-8046 FAX NUMBER: 727-441-2721
• CELL NUMBER: 727-793-8046 EMAIL: msdanahanson@gmail.com
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• C:\Users\GAO\Desktop\CLC.1411.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 1 of 8
0
• DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
• DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES - NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
• C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
• ? SUBMIT A COPY OF. THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR'SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
• page 7) Warranty Deed Attached - See Exhibit F.
. D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
• ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
• 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
• The original building architecture of the 20's is in character with the adjacent property and maintain the "Old
Clearwater" look and feel. The tile roof is in similar character to other well- maintained properties in the
• vicinity. It is a 1-story building as are other buildings in the area. The land ratio is weighted with more green
• _-space than many of the adjacent properties. _
We have a group of local gardeners who will groom 1411 N.Ft. Harrison with landscaping materials consistent
• with upscale Clearwater developments. We will plant the minimum amount of landscaping immediately and
will add additional materials as our budget/donation of materials allows.
• There are no proposed scale changes and population density of use will 'be consistent with purpose and not
vary greatly from past usages _
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
• impair the value thereof.
The north side parking lot is adjacent to an empty lot and would be no hindrance to development.
_- -
- - - - ---------------- - - --------- -
• 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
• There is no retail activity conducted in the building so traffic is minimal and the students are each supervised
- -- -- ----- -
by instructors and our activities will be of no adversity to the community.
• 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The private drive in the front will allow single egress south to north so that traffic congestion will be
minimized. Additionally, it will improve the safety of arriving and departing students. -- __-
- - - - ------- - - - --- -----
• 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Our current facility at 1611 N. Ft. Harrison handles primarily young children but the new facility at 1411 N Ft.
Harrison will also serve older youth and adults. We will add a GED program, English as a Second Language
- -- -- -- ------
• and develop a training program for green energy jobs. We have been in the neighborhood for 13 years and
have helped over 5,000 students improve their reading or math skills.
-- ------ -------- ---------- -----------
• 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
• adjacent properties.
The building is surrounded by green space and parking lot and the activities in the building are by nature
• relatively quiet. No visual, acoustic or olfactory ill effects will be present. The hours of operation will be
mostly afternoon and early evening.
• C: \Use rs\GAO\Desktop\CLC. 141 1.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 2 of 8
• WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
? Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
• achieved, in detail:
The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development
• standards set forth in this zoning district.
• Request for setback reduction on the west side: Without the requested set back reductions, there would be no
• safe place to drop off students. The variance in the front of the building allows for a 1-way route, thus providing a
means of controling vehicular traffic and ensuring student safety.
Request that dumpster remain in current location: Garbage dumpster needs to remain in its current location
• in order to facilitate solid waste vehicle access. This was agreed up in the DRC of 4/7/11. Attractive fencing
and landscaping to surround the dumpster have been designed into the site and landscape plans.
• Request to preserve the masonary wall: The 6' masonry wall on the east side of the property, along Garden
• Street, was built 4 years ago at the requirement of the city, and was permitted construction. It provides
valuable security. Additionally it was expensive to construct and would be expensive to demolish.
• 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
• The building will be well kept and maintained and will be an asset and resource to the community.
- ------ - - ------- --
--
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
• The property is self-contained, edged by a privacy fence on 3 sides which grants the surrounding properties quiet
enjoyment. There is an empty lot adjacent to the property, which at some point, we would like to buy.
• The building height and size is not being altered in anyway and thus will not effect adversely exiting or future
• development.
• Rather than impede orderly development of surrounding properties, this development will actually enhance such
activity. As an educational group we see opportunities to provide cutting edge training for green jobs; an area which is
• going to expand rapidly. Businesses will be attracted into the area because we will help produce a higher quality
workforce.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
• The building, empty, devalues the neighborhood, but developed, will be a premier property and will increase the
property values of the surrounding area.
• 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
• a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
• jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
• e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
• The proposed use is permitted in the current zoning. Additionally, the facility's adult training will include teaching people
how to become more hirable thus contributing to the overall economic and social well being of the area.
C:AUsers\GAO\DesktopACLC.1411.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 3 of 8
•
0
6. Flexibility with, regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
• a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district; NO
• b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; YES
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; YES
• d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements: Yes to each of the following. See photos, Exhibits D & E.
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
• ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
• ? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
• e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Yes, see site drawings pgs C3, C4 and landscape drawings pg LS 1.1
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clea6vater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
• or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
• See Exhibit I
? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
• See Exhibit I
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
• ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
• ? All adjacent streets and muNcipal storm systems;
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
• ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
• ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
• ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFVVMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
• See Exhibit J
? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is'included
----------
• tormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
• CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
• AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
• If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
•
• C:\Users\GAO\Desktop\CLC.1411.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 4 of 8
•
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Exhibit K Done by Rick Albee, City of
Clearwater
? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; Exhibit L
? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Exhibit M
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved; no deviations to standards being requested. 2-4/1000 sf required.
We are providing 5/1000.
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Users\GAO\Desktop\CLC.1411.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 5 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
?
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
_ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
Land area in square feet and acres; 46,574.13 Min 5-10,000 As Existing
Number of EXISTING dwelling units; n/a
---------------- -- ------- --
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; n/a?
Gross floor area devoted to each use; n/a
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the `35 35(33/2)
number of required spaces; _
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, 2060sf - 10%0 5.592 sf -27.4%
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement; _
Building and structure heights; 2T +/- 2T +/-
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 33,085.12 sf
(.71ISR)
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 7000 sf .15 FAR
-- ------- ----- -
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2X 11); See Exhibit A
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Users\GAO\Desktop\CLC.1411.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 6 of 8
• H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
Y
• ? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
• Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
• Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
• Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
• Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
• --- Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
• _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
_ protective measures;
• Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
• Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
• ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'%X 11); See Exhibit A
• ? COMPREHENSIVE 'LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
•
• I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
• ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: Annotated photos are attached as per agreement,
Exhibit O
• x All sides of all buildings
• Dimensioned
x Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
• Materials - stucco walls, clay tile roof, wood columns and trim, stone wall
• ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/z X 11 See Exhibit O
• J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3-1806) N/A
• ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
• removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
• freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
• ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
•
•
• C:\Users\GAO\D esktop\CLC. 141 1.Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 7 of 8
• Ar
0
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting-
X Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
47%
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. "Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
? Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
X Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL ?S
Sworn end s bscribed before me this / day of
l A.D. 20 to me and/or by
w q i ersonall krior has
produced ' ,
as identification.
0A.t'?? M??
Notary public, ;' R?
TA
My commission expires: ??„>I??(r
r y Comm Expires
Na, EE p? 77Q43
• C \Documents and Settings\gale\Desktop\CLC\CLC Comprehensive Infil.doc /tau?4`?,
Page 8 of 8 -j, 1I
• 4?'r QF F1.??`?
?11t1ilNm?M
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners. on deed - PRINT full names:
The Community Learning Center, Inc
y
Z That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1411 N_ Ft. Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 3375
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Business Use
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Dana Hanson, Corporate Secretary
Holly Haggerty, E=xecutive Director, Board Memeber
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the `owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (I e), the undersigned a hority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Befor me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this X.) day of
fry
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/s ands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
"" Comm Expaas (emu-? 4
Mar. 23.2015 -
No. EE 77043 Notary Publi Signat r
Notary Seal/Stamp ??- ?'U8l G P My Commission Expires: 13 4
_.O ?s
CAUsers\GAO\Desktop\CLC Comprehensive Infill.doc
Page 10 of 8
MARS
HgILSTREET
ua'Prcnr.OF,wArl
W
J
W
Q
03
co
Z n
4O
I
I?
I
/
s R'cn` c
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS
? BUILDING AREAS
? CONCRETE SIDEWALK AREAS
IMPERVIOUS ASPHALT VEHICULAR USE
AREAS
E
LANE SroRi
STRUCNRO
7 J
j '
i
e
w rc
e
LEGEND
d
ce)
Pv:41 d
HANDII AP
m
N C?
R RADIUS C
o
N =
0 V
R/W RIGHT NAY 4
Z
C C T O o
'
?
HANDICAP PARKING
a
C:
W LLj
y T m
- - ?eriPOSED CURB _
> U r
DG CURB TO REMAIN L U U
C
?F F P,TI LME R 0 °
O R
IN
F ?9ED CONCRETE
GRAPHIC SCALE -
ExJSTING TREE TO REMAIN
( IN F6Ef j - .-.
I tnc5 = 20 ft
GENERAL NOTES:
1. OWNER/ DEVELOPER: Community Learning Center U
1611 North Ft. Hamson Avenue J
Clearwater. Flonda 33755 L J ?
PH. (727) 793-8046
2721
FAX
1727
441 j j2 Q
Q
.
)
- r?i
°
°
U
2. ENGINEER. Richter Engineering, Inc. F
-
rp N J
2007 West Reynolds Street
P
56
i Z IL
C C
lant C
ty, Florida 33
3 N _
Q
PH-(813)754-8148
FAX
(813)752-0512 p
E V (?
.
3O"
3. SITE ADDRESS'. 1411 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVE. C)
Q 0
°
CLEARWATER, FL 33755 •_
PARCEL ID: 09291555530000080 m
092915511920000030
4. EXISTING ZONING: C.
FUTURE LAND USE: C. SOCIAUPUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES
DIV. 7, SEC 2-704. FLEXIBLE DEV. LEVEL TWO.
5. THE SITE APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE X. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 125096
0106 H, EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 17, 2005 (MAP INDEX NUMBER 12103CINDIB, MAP NUMBER
12103CO106H EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 17, 2005). POLARIS ASSOCIATES, INC. AND THE SIGN
NG Z
I
SURVEYOR HEREON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS DETERMINAT ON. THE Z Q
AUTHOR OF THE MAP, THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, OR THE LOCAL O a
AL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH MATTERS SHOULD BE -
CONTACTED
CONTACTED PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENTS BEING MADE FROM THIS INFORMATION. THE ABOVE
REFERENCED MAP STATES IN THE NOTES TO THE USER THAT 'THIS MAP IS FOR USE IN
R
'
R'
F
ADMINISTERING THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM'. 111 J
Q W J
6. EXISTING BLDG. HEIGHT 1 STORY W Z =
I-- LU I.- W
7. PRESENT USE THEATER Q Of F 06
3 0 j
5
8. DEVELOPED USE COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTER z > (
9. GROSS SITE AREA 46.574.12 SF (1.06 AC)
W Z
? Q Z
10. LAND USE TABULATION U W 0 J
U
LL
J Z 0
IMPERVIOUS SITE AREA
VEHICULAR USE AREA/SIDEWALK: 26,085.12 SF i
?
(-
BUILDINGBCANOPY _ 7.000.00 SF (OAS FAR) °
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 33,085.12 SF 10.71 ISR) a
U (n
uj
PERVIOUS SITE AREA
OPEN AREAS: 13489.00 SF w w
TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA 13,489.00 SF=0.31 AG a ¢
IMPERVIOUS AREAS 32,580.00 SF
PERVIOUS AREA 13489.00 SF to
46,574.13 SF 1.07 AC
11. PARKING TABULATION
WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS.
PARKING REQUIRED =FIVE SPACE PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
_ (7,000 SF FLOOR AREA) / (1,000 SF)X(5 SPACES)
= 35 SPACES 0
PARKING PROVIDED u
STANDARD PARKING SPACES =33 SPACES a
HANDICAP PARKING SPACES 2 SPACES
TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED =35 SPACES
12. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
13, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS OF STEPS. RAMP B RAILS.
F
14. VEHICULAR USE AREA CALCULATION: 0
THERE SHALL BE 10% OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE FOR THE TOTAL VEHICULAR USE AREA:
(20,604 00 SF OF VUA)(10%) = 2,060 SF OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA REQUIRED 0
PROVIDED: 5.592 SF (27.14%) ? W J- N- ? Z N
15. EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN TO BE SEALED AND RE-STRIPED.
16. EXISTING BUILDING HEIGHT 27 FEET H.
8
17. LOT WIDTH FT, HARRISON AVENUE 226 FEET, AND GARDEN AVENUE 116 FEET. S
6
E?
rca
mn?enr. ???
AL
n ar ww
?wNa. ww
SHEET NO.
NOT FOR EXHIBIT A
JSTRUCTION
li
rt
M
,113
I
` °a
g
? ro
?r
s
VJ z
T?T O
E -n
no
J O
T
1 N
-
I
I
- o o G o i _ ?
n v z - n
z N A - o ??
` " a o n
9 >
- ? D y
m r A
Z m ? -
'- m V n
D
Z Z
r
m
G)
m
z
O
m g o PROJECT"AME' CLEARWATER
m o a m R LEARNING CENTER
MD
m E
'
X v A Woman
s Touch Richter Engineer, Inc.
=
I PROJECT LOCATION.
3 n 1411 NORTH FORT HARRISON Building Contractors LLC Civil Engineering
# s
CLEARWATER, FL 100 Colette Court 2007 West Reynolds Street
o
sREETN-E Oldsmar, FL 34677 Plant City, Florida 33563
N ifi
n
s
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS PLAN Cert
cate of Aut
on-fion 09356
- -
E NO ` onTF a, r,,,
SS833V W3 8
FORT HgRRISOn,
,, . .
+? ame. CI.EM
o?owmg rvame: cWsars\nEUVoo??me?esA?ei?comT??ay ?a.?my ce,te,Aco.sv-r-AexHieir r,.a.a w lo, mn - a.;apT
7
Z
0
i
-n
0
x
a
n
a
? Y x
I m 8 ? vnxwe ?l Cpl ITS /
8a
r
m
a
m
$
o PROJECT NAME.
CLEARWATER
o R
fill m LEARNING CENTER
E
'
x V PROJECT L.CATION A Woman
s Touch Richter Engineer, Inc.
= a $ 1411 NORTH FORT HARRISON Building Contractors LLC Civil Engineering
W s ARWATER
F
,
CLE
L 100 Colette Court 2007 West Reynolds Street
o
SHEETNAME Oldsmar, FL 34677 Plant City, Florida 33563
N
S SOCIAL PUBLIC SERVICES WITHIN 1500' Certificate of Authonzahon 09356
Ana aegrsnanoN„m?. wise NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
aew ash
Exhibit C Notes
304.1 Business Group B - to include: offices; educational occupancies for students above the
12`h grade; training and skill development not within a school or academic program.
Social/public service agencies:
1. The parcel proposed for development does not abut any property designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas:
The adjacent propery to the south is an office complex. The adjacent property to the
north is a vacant building. East and West are streets.
• 2. The social/public service agency shall not be located within 1,500 feet of another social/public
service agency.
• Exhibit C shows map of property at center of 1500' radius, downloaded from the
• Pinellas County GIS website. The only non-profits within the radius are:
1403 N Ft Harrison, owned by RCS. It is a residential shelter
• 1402 N MLK, registered as A Spiritual Change, Inc and the Johnathan Wade Center for
Growth and Development, is a church/religious organization. The 1500' radius just touches into
• the property. The building itself is tangent but just east of the line, while some of the parking
behind the building is within the sphere.
• The remaining nonprofits are an Elks lodge, Mt Carmel Church, Center for Human
Development (a church) and St John's Baptist Church. None of these are social/public service
• agencies.
3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or will not result in a building which is out
of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development. N/A-no reduction in lot area.
4. Front setback: The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance.
The reduction in front setback allows for increased safety of pedestrians who will be
dropped off at the building by providing a one-way vehicular path.
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
See Exhibit B, Emergency Vehicle Access Plan
b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient
parking layout or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess
of the minimum required.
Reduction in rear setback requested to allow for the existing 6' masonry wall to
remain, which provides security, improved design and appearance (since it matches the
building. Other fences around area are wood, and not architecturally compatible), and green-
space and landscape buffers have been increased.
•••••••••0••••••••••••••••••••••
y 4.
R, q .4, p
a•^?? 4 X14:
1
Jai ? R?1A'? { y fY
a.
A ,t
S?Yk a
rk rt• Me
I
•? r
E7.01".
.
$t.
i m g o PROJECT nnE CLEARWATER
R
mo
m
m
$
R LEARNING CENTER
X E
'
v A Woman
s Touch Richter Engineer, Inc.
_ i PROJECT LOC?TION
NORTH FORT HARRISON Building Contractors LLC Civil Engineering
W s
CLEARWATER, FL 100 Colette Court 2007 West Reynolds Street
sRE... Oldsmar, FL 34677 Plant City, Florida 33563
N
N
F C
tifi
t
f A
th
i
093
6
i
S EXISTING BUILDING er
ca
e o
u
or
zat
on
5
',? -
50104d 3 •a
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4!
e s,}t? d"?. S
Y S
dJ
J.
y
J
? S r Yap ? i A ? I ? i
,
? 1
1
r
1?
?
.
.#? ,M r
pr
a
i
Y t
;
j
ti {
t
?i
r
,
i `_
, ?
?
i
' Ir
? ?
i t j 1tt
?t
?
}
i
? } I11
Y
l
1
I
jj
?
l
? t _ li `
j?
f
•
)13
i
Ire ?, '` {{{ff I
i??
i?
l
111
?
?
7{f11111
fr: I
t.
PN°JECTNAME
m m g o CLEARWATER
mo
m o R LEARNING CENTER
e
x v PROJECTt°CATI°N A Woman's Touch Richter Engineer, Inc.
=
n $ 1411 NORTH FORT HARRISON Building Contractors LLC Civil Engineering
$ s LEARWATER
FL
,
C 100 Colette Court 2007 West Reynolds Street
o
SHEET NAME Oldsmar, FL 34677 Plant City, Florida 33563
rn N
s
EXISTING BUILDING Certificate of Authorization 09356
F 1-1a
v E__
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
BY
P
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Parcel Tax LD. No.(s): 09-21 51192-000-0030
This Instrument Prepared by and Return to:
Douglas L. Hilkert, Esq.
CHURCHILL TITLE COMPANY
2557 Nursery Road Suite A
Clearwater, Florida 33764
(727) 524-4222
FILE NUMBER: 200703004
Grantee S.S. No.:
Name: The Community Leaming Center, Inc.
Grantee S.S. No.:
Name:
litp Errh
(Statutory Form)
(Wherever used herein, the term "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include the heirs, personal representatives, successors and/or
assigns of the respective parties hereto; the use of the singular number shall include the plural, and the plural the singular, the
use of any gender shall include all genders.)
THIS INDENTURE, made this day of April, 2007 BETWEEN BOSS REAL ESTATE
INVESTMENTS, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED L61iLiTY COMPANY, ("Grantor") of Pinellas County, State of
Florida, and THE COMMUNlw LEARNING CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA NON PROFIT CORPORATION,
("Grantee'), whose tax mailing address is 1611 N. Fort Harrison; Clearwater, Florida 33755.
• WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration, to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Grantee, Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the
• following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit:
• See Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
• Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record, and taxes for the year 2007
and thereafter.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
And Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gra;rtor i`t ii
first above written creunto set Grantors hand and seal the day and year
.
Signed, a led and delivered in our presence:
Sign
Print d
Sign
Boss REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, A
FLORIDA 1,11,111M LIABILITY COMPANY
Y
3 N-1, -
AFRIM INCA, ITS MANAGING MEMBER
2490 Meander Lane
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
Douglas L. Hilkert
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30 day of April
2007
by AFRIM
VINCA, MANAGING ,
,
MEMBER OF BOSS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC A FLORIDA LA4= LIABILITY
COMPANY, who is personally known to me (or who has produced
identification). as
tioatulum!!!//
NOTARYL
?
???
1as L. ,
Sign
* ; •. " : * = Print Douglas L. Hilkert
aDD210220 : Q My Commission Expires:
?i ;??l?Vil ?i?: :y ra ?'.? ? a?,"f //???!/!l
111 O?\`\\\
1i UP k?r;1ljt? Flt l 111
Exhibit F
aT1
fD
d.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fghibit A
Thatpart of Lot 3,:aecording to cePLu ofLESLgy'S
Public
asfoIIo,we; g'Ws: B Bees;of4iborou ouaty, Elands, of whichqN, recorded in heedRccord "g,"
g ai a.poini m1h° East bo Coun 'was f , on Page 471,
the SE' cvzner. f.said lot; ??Y ofsaid Lot 3' o=mg y a P? P=tr- rly ddscdbed
g thence North 81°30' we 'which 9s 66 feethTorfh ?g said boundary fivtu
I'L Harrieonlayenue; thence N:14 st, 38D&&,.,
er ore o;lras to the
North
ly boon o ° ?°r vPro•?ately so) Fast along pt Han ison i4vemie t° in3er"I?y bomulmy of '
Y of said Lot 3; thence Sontbeasterl al?oag saidNorthe ec[u Witt the
ab Lot 3 and thence 9, along the E b of y rly boLmdary as the Northeast.
ove desciZed.platof land, the said lot 132 feet iD the P.O,$; pXW ] IO comer of said
Avenue, also I.$g$ P ly?g Easterly "Of the westerly line of the TING DER tom the
north b AT'TD.EXCEPT the folio Pablfo fhorougbfare3,;0.7; as C?h¢den
bht of-°waY of I at 3 otLESLFy'g.. ON P ortion nfLot.3: Ccimmence at fire iateiaeciioa.of.tbe
of the pnbli cReeords ofHzllsbaiouP? C°tmiy' a, flf recorded
whicfi ded oti Peli '
°
y]me of Crar , . Pmcllas :niaq4; .1884, ini Deed$ook Page 471,
'long the den Avenue as it is Presentl t4 was formerly
y $.Dart, with the:weat
of .the'ceIIO?•bo! ad . ofsa d Lor 3..a dis ? f° 72 1ed; ?°nce N.81°14'34" W (basis ofbearlap is aayvme
ofa o.69 feet; thence S_06°04' d)
vacated 10-foot 'Iley 06" w:, alongthe southerl
E `S SVBD ON e lyin g west of Lots S, 6.mnd 7 and east ofLota 8; 9_and e s y XL-Mi=
CO tY. FIozid o f Vlhi Il , as rocmdha.hy P. $ook 7; Page 17, ofthe.Pnblic Rbcords:a10,
f js
of and parallelw the northb Co"?y formerly a Part, 15-02 feet; thence S: B1.14'34"
right-of"'ay line of Garden A 15.D6 et the P?omt of of 0.62 ftt ttienoeN.13°5734 Eal15. 00 ong the to ?$; coDtamiag 0-0247 ages, mots or less.
4r ?
u°N r
Exhibit G
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit B
Zota Eight (S) and Nina (9), of E.A. MARSI;AZ,LS SUBDIVIRON, according to the plat thereof as recorded in P1at
Book 7, Page '17, public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, ofwhich Pinellas county ?czi a
with he Westerly 5 feet Of, closed alley lyingparallel and adjacent to the Eas was fo
E P MAIZSHAI L
Si7BDMSION. of
terly boundary linos of said Lots 8 anda
r!li4 s
Exhibit H
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
STORMWATER NARRATIVE
for
The Community Learning Center
1411 N. Ft Harrison
Clearwater, FL 33755
Exhibit i
The project consists of the rehabilitation of an existing building. The site improvements
will involve enhancements to the landscaping, minimal improvements to the onsite
drainage,, and removal of paved parking surface. The end result will be a reduction in
impervious area.
The stormwater system is located m a closed basin. The system is currently operating as
designed.. Per jurisdictional requirement, a trench drain will be installed in the
northernmost driveway to intercept onsite generated runoff that currently flows offsite.
Roof runoff will be collected from the south side of the building and routed to the
retention area. No other improvements are proposed at this time.
SWFWMD has granted an exemption to the requirement for a stormwater permit for this
site.
It should be noted that there is no change in the onsite drainage basins.
y ?' d
s
r v
f z
• Mark Richter
FLPE56196
• Richter Engineering, Inc
• CA09356
2007 W. Reynolds St
• Plant City, FL 33563
813-754-8148
'" sEE o?r.2asn:W
BP ?BM1fN6 BY M<M m. / I Vim.
? -
vP
i l °
/r P ??-
W ?
Q
?
C ? a-zruz BEM ?u+01
m
2?? ? sro.s ro aecv? f I?
1°U,U m,a
° ,
x
?; E
nsnMC vaM 4
ro vFLUx ?
1
G
X wmM
/
ly?J c,,r°a o. rrzo
I?ias
...
..
.
..
\ rs
.
. a .tea
.
.
. ??? ?. - -
oar mMMr„rz er . a ? /
Eusn?? rzEE
na E ,r.P.? nsr P-C- 9A=
i
.? .?
-- -- - --------
ARSHA?LL STREET - - - -------------- ,x
? T-
y,
?? ? \ -y_ Y mt cWMENrs ev RkM .lB¢ / t
\I it
.. 7
TREELEGEND ,.
v
X
•o tiu
i r
GRAPHIC SCALE
n -7o) n
1111.111T C EE FE MOVED
-,T C ,TRUCTUPE TO RL REMOVEo
...MDL
LT E
LTI
e w?MPS .
?ows-T ?LT.rsa.?«.?a
?n
ac cww0xT0 Br ma -ML •?10
I;EL
-- RI LSM
T
NOT FOR
JSTRUCT
? m
C C N M
a $
$' y ov
W p m ?' 3
W w s
N
U c
$ a
L J ? ?
H Uyy
J. F LL
O
E U U E
3 E
°- O
67
z
N
L- LL
_ S
FW z
QU KF O
aZ 0it J
U? OL o
J z
4 0 ? g
G
fr
C3 of C4
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 00 *0 0 0 0 0••• 0 0•* 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0* 0• 0•• 0
?? ?O ?? NOIlOnalSNOO
d019133NM
aOJ ION
?L
$
^ .?
$ 333iet, 3nx3nvx3oara oxv 1331 szz 3nx3nv xoslanvx sa x3a Mao, z?
'
?; N Z° - m -_ < m A s 0301noad
1%nzal iS ieS
E Ivon vnn io is areaB'021
I
3
0
I
j
II
v3aSIM
No_ ?
3
S
I I,
11-l3seo SNVwrvoaon 10
1noeSWdl nill
illav33s ct
t 3orvva-NI a3N33aas 3S „vxs irv3wmno3,varvvxo3w nv z?
?
-
i I
s3?ves ss swves oxMabe atlvaNbss
yp
z 03a1notld ONMtlba
_
II Itl
IS30ras slxles aoS (
.0.. io isSOa i a3a 3ave53Zvi o3wno3n --d
3bv aoo,a
x
Si 3w3axto3an
1
xM.r,n?.arv,xtlbe 1
w
SmzE b3tlr5 ana3ewl
V3tte 315 snann3d
F
£ ' 3 ; 1
it seo 3i ,I,bM
!^
A ?
n0
mrmA
m as
b3nb3nss„ana3ewl
rvo,r,nsv.3sn axn at
2
z D 2 Z RI
D Irv so 1 is zl ns st r3bb 3LSSSroao 5
)
O
DT
Z;o
n3.rv3o naw31nu1Nnwwoo 3sn a3ao,3raa e
po p
m-q
m? aazv3lu 3sn 3x3s3tle e
S1N
11V130 N1VM301S 313NONOO
' 3003 03N3N0IH1
' 1 1-? No u3xxoo a a i io bwMOaeab aoi sine xM.o3. 3e rer<3,33 a
one s TI --
+ - . IF 310N O O j „l u III- I,I. III I IIII III f'l
t/ n
{ Mi
N r ?
+nrasrn xx x n V 'vl e 1
3<rs sn or ..,
?- I I
Iq I I
uux3 mx oa t t -'
-1-3 A
¢ m310
X6§69 ( .ii a i h rrn..
c x z m .,nls .Na.3x oa,e oxus><3 5 _ _ 3" ?„ I' _
F mp
? ? 3nos ?Itii?a ?? 1 ?_ 1711yH
i?
III I-,n,
0 _ e•'.a "" nt91l s3a of tlol?rWws !°xs DJ? -1 ?1 rt3 1.-1 1 1313
?tl3ewnHidrw?e dHYSJ[?a?Ov sY»"1[43AY?W 93?1Va 3Ai1?3 N90G taco v ?. 11
naN3a8313,ra3a3i3x.o. ervaaooov xiwz oa"o,Opp3in oisriiee:ls s? --
131
53nrv3ab3?ntl35,nanen? a?e,??.xe ? ?? ? j ? d . ?? _ . ?
ON isl 3
ocarxJ26?tsste3eo _ s
,3atlba -v 1
aeoocoocsssst¢eo r 1 rw) 33N,i uxn 9 .11.1 (awl M
3 a
e?x fo
n D '3ntl Nosumnl iaoe tuaoN I let mnr3n
N O (p < 3aOOtl / o ? () c (aUl l J
O C 3 ros IEtel He 8 1d,( 1 .s 11 101 N 7 ? +qi NM luea 1 1 11 n x 1x1 haul exn??
r N Gl m aul u 3nna a33rvlou3 z x..r- -,w.°".-o ________._ ., 1 11 I',W?_y
O
n - r
? ? ? ? seaece<1<zer xe _ -- - ?I' ? ? ? ra<nll
? ° ° c s?"'w;w w? tl3aa,3n3a,tl3rvMa ? ,?.? __ - t ?r?. ??? 1 l
:S310N 1VN3N30 1 s,;., n 1 ? ? caul ao?s ,3, _
-_ ?I 137 3 I ? .IN3- X31 dl ? /
?.n3e 33n, .N, r - ' a?vos ??xavao ? - _ ? .In? roy?axl a3<? ,3x3 x3<sa~?
? O L ? IIH?d ?--
o .'
n a,3a "
N
8 p ? l
s ,? _ 11vHSNyw
_ ' .r QYa F- _? - S
m° ° m m it I I'' I_=
o
m i
r?vN ?/u
N = d ." I III 4 -
e
W N ?
ON3fl3l
_ .? 1, ol -I.
E 1 /n oa ,?JysM rus .o? I
?\ i r/n 'r.sx 31 ?3 ,inm s
s of l
man
1 xor3<oaa 31. -ra11.
(I' T
1 ? ? x sxwnsa,aoa sN
?n ss? 63+,rn 1x1 "?-- -"-
-a3?A M? /M nxa (/(1
(N9 ? u) erp .,9 (Il
I A
?'ms ?11 / 2
Fo
s6? iu (n ? ?
?xi3 { c
a? ?3 .33„3 m
31.
?z n(ia
,eao3t3a en.p euno IcJ
txs¢ .wn,o??hl
r
z, P
•
•
gale Pollack
ILM
,w
'Rom: Curt Metcalf (curtmetcalf@terragraphicsinc:.com]
nt: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:40 PM
: david.kramer@watermatters.org
Gale Pollack; msdanahanson@gmail.com
Object: Clearwater Learning Center - ERP Exemption Application
Oachments: 101-Clearwater Learning Center-Cover Sheet.pdf; 102-Clearwater Learning Cerrter-General
• Notes (C2).pdf; 103-Clearwater Learning Center-Demolition Plan (C3).pdf; 104-11."Iearwater
Learning Center-Site Plan (C4).pdf; curtmetcalfmcf
L? al1-Clearwater 102-Clearwater 103-Clearwater 104-Clearwater curtrnetcalf.vcf
116ming Center... Learning Center... Learning Center... Learning Center... (329 B)
David,
ase find the attached PDF files of the construction documents currently under review,
the City of Clearwater DRC., for your review and comment. By and large this i.s an
Wntical project to the 2007 ERP exemption on file with your office. The only hanges not
lected in this set are the planned removal of the Ball Court shown on the 20;)7 design,
d
possible landscape design inventory changes. We would like to formally request a new
6 exemption status for this project based on, remc:val of asphalt pavements re:lucing
>ollution load of stormwater runoff to the existing and functional Stormwater Management
tem. We look forward to yoUr review and comments of this project with the hopes that it
ets the expectations for approval of our request.
• always, I (we) would like to thank you for fitting us in to your schedule.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
0
• Gale Pollack,
AI
• From: Dave Kramer [dave.krarrier@swfwmd.state.fl.us]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 9:01 AM
• To: Curt Metcalf
Cc: Gale Pollack; msdanahaiison@gmail.com
• Subject: RE: Clearwater Learning Center - ERP Exemption Application
• Cart,
• Thanks for -Ihe email. I took a look at the attachments and the exemption we issued in 2007
is still ap]_'licable. There are no permits required from the SWFWMD for the activities
• proposed. L<:t me know if you have any additional questions or concerns.
• David Kramer, P.E.
Surface Watc:r Regulation Manager
• Tampa Regulation Department
Southwest FI_ori.da Water Management District
(800) 836-0197 or (813) 985-7481, ext. 2009 dave.kramer@watermatters.org
•
LJ
• -----Origir.11 Message-----
From: Curt 'detcalf fmailto:curtmetcalf(jterragraphicsinc.com]
Sent: Thursiay, April. 07, 2011 7:49 PM
• To: Dave Kremer
Cc: Gale Pollack; msdanahanson@gmail.com
• Subject: Clearwater Learning Center - IRP Exemption Application
• David,
Please find the attached PDF files of the construction documents currently under review,
• by the Cit); of Clearwater DRC., for yo.ir review and comment. By and large this is an
identical project to the 2007 ERP exemption on file with your office. The only changes not
reflected in this set are the planned removal of the Ball Court shown on the 2007 design,
• and possib'.e landscape design inventory changes. We would like to formally request a new
ERP exemption status for this project based on, removal of asphalt pavements reducing
• pollution =Load of stormwater runoff to the existing and functional Stormwater Management
System. We look forward to your review and comments of this project with the hopes that it
• meets the (:xpectations for approval of our request.
As always, I (we) would like to thank you for taking my telephone call and fitting us in
• `o your scl edule.
• TMPORTANT 1110TICE: All E-mail sent to or from this address are public record and archived.
• The Southw,::st Florida Water Management: District does not allow use of District equipment
and E-mail facilities for non-District: business purposes.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r
•
Exhibit K
TREE SURVEY
Rick Albee, City of Clearwater offered to do and did the tree survey at
1411 N. Ft. Harrison in April 2011. It is on file in his office.
•
BUFFER SCHEDULE
i..."FER FFH'A': REQU IRED TREES=5 TREES PRGVIDED=4 OAK, 1 EXISTING OAK, 1 EXISTING PALM
FFEB' REQUIREDTREES=5 TREES PROVIDED=3 ELM2HOLLY
FFE'C'REQUIRED TREES=4 TREES PROVIDED=4 HOLLY, 2 ENLISTING PALM
FERD' REQUIRED TREES=2 TREES PROVIDED=1 ELM, 1 EXISTING OAK
FER'E'RQUIREDTREES=4 TREES PROVIDED=2 ELM, 2 EXISTING OAK, 4 EXISTING PALM
' F: REQUIRED TREES=7 TREES PROVIDED-2 OAK. 3 EXISTING OAKS, 6 EXISTING PALM
® EXISTING OAK TO REMAIN
EXISTING PINE TO REMAIN
EXISTING PALM TO REMAIN
M EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP)
MOVAL OF EXISTING TREES IS LIMITED
D) DEAD LIVE OAK TREE AT NORTH
EHICULAR ENTRANCE (4) SABAL PALM
TREES WITH LESS THAN 10'C T., (1)
UEEN PALM, (4) DECLINING OAKS
OTED ON CITY COMMENTS, AND
ERAL PROHIBITED TREES. NO
REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED ON SITE.
WNER SHALL PRUNE AND REMOVE
LIMBS FROM EXISTING TREES.
NO EXISTING TREES WILL BE IMPACTED
BY THE ADDRION OF PROPOSED
TLITIES. NO ROOT PRUNI N-ERATION
LL BE REQUIRED.
TREE TO BE REMOVED- REFERENCE
DEC COMMENTS BY RICK ALBEE
128 SO. FT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE-2%
SIGHT VISIBIUTYTRIANGLES -
•
Q
,OVE (2)TRUNKS OF RECUNATA PALM
AND ALLOW LOWER
STEMS TO REGENERATE t
F
I
• O
411 SO. FT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE -- 12 CT
• 2?
TJN
• 3
3 CIV
trc?
SP 1B
8M
• SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES -
40
JP
• 11
SM \
• 1121Q . FT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE-3 %
• TREE TO BE REMOVED- REFERENCE
DIG COMMENTS BY RICK ALBEE ?-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
GROSS VEHICULAR USE AREA = M 604 SO. FT.
REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE = 2.0130 FT. (10% COVERAGE)
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PROVIDED = 9,155 SO. FT.(M%COVERAGE)
INTERIOR TREES REQUIRED=14
INTERIOR TREE PROVIDED = 6 EXISTING OAKS, 3 EXISI ING PINES,
5 OAKS, 1 ELM= 15 TREES
FOUNDATION TREES PROVIDED FOR ST FRONTAGE.
6 PALMS AND 2 ACCENT TREES
O INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA (TYP)
COMMENTS BY RICK ALBEE
420 SO. FT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE-5%
ARSHALL STREET
(40' 6Y0NT-DF?IYAh
96 SO. FT. INTERIOR LANDSGJZE-1 %
END OF SOLID FENCE
-? S.DD BUFFER'S
?- 2887 SO. FT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE-25%
(3RA7 ILIMl PEPPER TREE TO BE REMOVED J 5.0
(TREE MIS-IDENTIFIED ON SURVEY)
789 SQ. FT. INTERIOR LAI
1 TREE TO BE REMOVED- REFERENCE
DRC COMMENTS BY RICK ALBEE
50D BUFFER V
2 PALMS TO BE REMOVED- REFERENCE
-- DRC COMMENTS BY RICK ALBEE
BUFFER'D'
(2) EXISTING PALMS TO BE REMOVED T
PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE
CODE CI TY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPECIFICATION SPACING
HIS 28 HIBISCUS ROSH-S ENENSIS HIBISCUS 3 UAL, 2430" HT., HEAVY 3' O.C.
IC 61LEXCASSINE TENSAW' DARODIN HOLLY TENSAW' 10 HT. X45' S PD., 2.5' CAL. AS SHOWN
INS 3 ILEXWELUE R. STEVENS' NELLIE STEVENS HOLLY 7 GAL., 3HT., 2' SPD. AS SHOWN
JP 425 JUNIPERUS PARSONII PARSONS JUNIPER 1 GAL., 10-12' SPD. 20.C.
LIN 2 LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE W HITS' 10 HT X5 SPD. 2' CAL. AS SHOWN
LMG 158 LIRIOPE MUSCARI'EMERALD GODDESS' GIANT URIOPE *EMERALD GODDESS' i GAL.. 10' HT. X10' SPD. 18' O.C.
QV 11 QUERCUS VIRGINIANA LIVE OAK 1Z RT. X4' SPD., 2.5' CAL. AS SHOWN
RI 85 RAP HIOLEPIS INDICA WHITE' DWARF INDIAN HAWTHORN 3 GAL. 15' HT. X 18' SPD., DENSE 2.5 GO
.
SAR 66 SCHEFFLERA ARBORICOLA DWARF SCHEFFLERA 3 GAL., 24" HT., FULL 30.C.
SP 6 SABAL PALMETTO CABBAGE PALM 12' C. T. AS SHOWN
TJN M5 TRACHELOSPERMUM ASIATCUM MINIMA' DWARF CONFEDERATE JASMINE 1 GAL., 10-12" SPD. 18' O.C.
UP 7 ULMUS PARVIFOLIA'ALLEE' ALLEE ELM 12' HT. X' SPO., 2.5' CAL. AS SHOWN
VA 230VIBUMUMAWAS KI MIRROR LEAF VIBURNUM 3GAL, 24'11T.X2 SPD. 3'O.C.
2FU 20 Z MIA FURFURACEA CARDBOARD PALM 7 GAL., 24' HT. X30' SPD. AS SHOWN
' E.
.E ?
3
Q
J e
Is
-F 3 PALMS TO BE REMOVED-REFERENCE
J ORD COMMENTS BY RICK ALBEE
R1.
•
Physical S urvey 2011:
• Raw Data Analysis: Comparison from 2007 survey
• To actual
• ° a
a
o
v >
=3
n a >
i H y
N n ct
T
0
U t'n
N
•
O
O >?-
H
H
0
y
0
i--I
v
E
N ?.{ C:
, v o
• !_
N O
N
N Y--
\ W
-'t
C
.-I
I
L H T
+? r I U
2k 's. 'L
C M F M l0 w d
E E 3 N
(0 i N
• H a N a i 0 U v
U -
• 1 1 Oak
7 31 9.87
2 1 Oak
9 35 11.15
0 3 1 Oak
14 0.00
• 4
1 Palm
• 24 78 24.84
5 1 Palm
• 5 39 12.42
6 1 Oak
• 7 20 6.37
7 1 Palm
• 4 43 13.69
8 1 Palm
• 18 57 18.15
9 1 Oak
• 6 24.5 7.80
10 1 Palm
• 14 53 16.88
11 1 Oak
• 15
0.00
• 12 1 Palm 12 39 12.42
•I
13A 1 Palm
r1
LJ
28 I 63 1 20.06
13B 1 1 PjIm
0 1 68 1 21.66
13C I 1 I Palm
0 56 17.83
14 2 Oak 12 54 17.20
15 2 Fir
0.5 0.00
•4/19/2011
0
1411 N Ft Harrison Tree Survey
4/19/2011
N 0
0
u E
E O
_
to C CU
CU L CL a
O
z f0
U
0
O)
L a.
I?
L
South property line
South property line
14 GONE
South property line
South property line
South property line
South property line
South property line
South property line
S outh property line
R SP5
South property line
15 GONE
South property line
South property line
Survey includes an alley
behind fence: Palm is on Between
fence and
lot line on
survey: In alley 2.5' from
southside, between
fence 127.5 and 116.5
s an alley
Fnden
Palm is on Between fence and
lot line on
7' 4"' from southside, be tween
127.5 and 116.5
e weep ence an
t td
In the alley, young palm
,
24" trunk, ' not on survey. southside at
corner between
127.5 and 116.5
South property line
GONE
South property line
1
Physical Survey 2011:
•
R
aw Data Analysis: Comparison from 2007 survey
• To actual
• CL C _Z CL 0
aj
v ?
cy a)
Ln
^ V
• L ???`` O O cn
L of fl. (n
fp
i--I N C 'N'
R O a"1 •? t-i N
41
41 G1 II
• C O a ai C (1) 4Z
O
V
a,
*
H to l0 w cr
E: O
CU _ E: L
•
H a N a L 0 c
U -
•
16 2 Palm
12
0.00
•
17 2 Palm
18
0.00
•
18 2 Palm
12
0.00
•
19 2 Palm
• 12
0.00
20 2 Oak
• 5
0.00
21 3 Oak
• 30 87 27.71
22 3 Palm 22 0.00
• 23 3 Palm 20 0.00
24 3 Oak 8 37.5 11.94
• 25 3 Oak 4
24 7.64
• 26 3 Oak 12 52.5 16.72
• 27 3 Oak 8 39 12.42
28 3 Fir 0.625 0.00
• 29 3 fir 0.625 0.00
30 4 Oak 18 64 20.38
• 31 4 O
k
a 7 0.00
• 32 4 Oak 6 0.00
• 33 4 Palm 6
0.00
34 4 Palm 6 20 6.37
• 35 4 Palm 6 20 6.37
• 36
37 5 Palm 8 0.00
5 Palm 8 0.00
• 38 5 Fir 0.5 0.00
39 5 Oak 6 0.00
• 40 5 Oak 7 0.00
• 41 5 Fir 0.5 0.00
42 6 O
ak ,
10 0.00
43 6 Oak 10 62 19.75
44 6 Palm 14 52 16.56
•4/19/2011
•
1411 N Ft Harrison Tree Survey
4/19/2011
H ;
N 0
U E
C GJ ?= ?n
N O
'A C Q O
L
0
L1 J
Cr
12 I GONE l East property line
GONE
East property line
GONE
East property line
GONE
East property line
GONE
East property line
East property line
22 GONE North side rear
20 GONE North side rear
N
rth
id
o
s
e rear
N
th
id
or
s
e rear
N
th
id
or
s
e rear
7 Middle of parking
l
t
o
GONE N
th
id
or
s
e rear
GONE N
th
id
or
s
e rear
20 DECLINING: REMOVE Retention area
GONE Retention area
6 GONE Retention area
TOO SMALL TO MEASURE
R
t
i
e
ent
on area
R PR 2 Retention area
R PR 2 Retention area
8 GONE East side
arkin
p
g
8 GONE East side
arkin
p
g
GONE East side
arkin
p
g
GONE NW corner
GONE NW corner
GONE NW corner
42 and 43 grew together West side, Ft
Harris
on
42 and 43 grew together West side, Ft
Harri
son
West Tide, Ft
Harrison
2
•
• Physical Survey 2011:
Raw Data Analysis: Comparison from 2007 survey
To actual
LJ
452.75 491.08 125 Totals
• 5 Q) °
Q) N
O
d
° _
-? 3 0 7
L of
Q
N^
V a-i ai M
N U *. v o
t
c °o C o F
r-4
y
-
r-
- " it
v E
V1
O
• vO N
A N
s 01 Q) N (U
im a) 4.1 " (, E W L O ISO
L
XL
*"
T
I
'L
I--
M LDD
v
-
E
E 'c7 7
M
N Q.
Z
OU
• Q, C M i5
i
U -
• A 1 P
l
a
m 0 34 10
83 "
. trunk 15
tall SE corner
C 1 Palm 0
• 0.00 no trunk south side
B 1 P
l
a
m 0 23 7.32 trunk 18" tall south side
• D 1 Palm trunk 21" tall with 2
0 50 15.92 h s
th
id
s
oots ou
s
e
• E 1 Palm
0 trunk 21" tall with 2
24 7.64
F
1
P
l shoots south side
• a
m 0 45 14.33
th
id
sou
s
e
• G 3 Oak 0 107 34.08 south of 26 & 27 in grassy south of 26 & 27 in
H 4 Pi 0 area rass area
ne 49 15.61 R NI R
t
i
•
4
Pi e
ent
on
ne 0 46.5 14.81 R PE 5 Retention
4 O
k
• a 0 10 3.18 10' tall, new tree Retention
K 1 Palm 0 35 11.15 south
id
s
e
• 34 4 Palm Has new
health shoots
0 ,
not et 4' Retention
• 35 4 Palm := Has new
health shoots
0 7 ,
• not et 4' Retention
•
0
0
0
0
•4/19/2011
•
1411 N Ft Harrison Tree Survey
4/19/2011
# of Inches on 2007
Survey 453
# of inches on 2011
Physical survey _491
Plus # of inches
requiring removal 20
Net gain from 2007
survey _18
3
M Man
SECTION 9 - TOWNSHIP 29 S. - RANGE 15 E.
1 !'1/1ATIe%AI AAA r%
PROJECT
LOCATION
a
N. T. S.
•
•
•
•
CASE NUMBER:
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
• * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 11/29/2010)
•
• PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: The Community Learning Center, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 1611 N. Ft Harrison, Clearwater FL 33755
• PHONE NUMBER: 727-441-4444 CELL NUMBER: 727-793-8046
E-MAILADDRESS: msdanahanson@gmall.Com
•
PROPERTY OWNER(S): The Community Learning Center
List ALL owners on the deed
• AGENT NAME: Dana Hanson _
MAILING ADDRESS: 1611 N Ft Harrison, Clearwater FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-8046 FAX NUMBER: 727-441-2721
727-793-8046 E-MAIL
• CELL NUMBER: ADDRESS- msdanahanson@gmail.com
Clearwater
Planning & Development
Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application
are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
• The landscaping requirements of Article 3, Division 12, may be modified or waived as part of a Level One (Flexible Standard) or Level Two
(Flexible Development) application, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape
• Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans, sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be
necessary to supplement the information provided on this worksheet. Landscaping associ#ted with the Comprehensive Landscape Program
shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
• 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
• a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
R
• b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards
We will be adding additional trees and green space Local arborists will be working with us
• to grow gardens and Florida friendly landscaping.
• Page 1 of 2
•
n
r0
D
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
2. LIGHTING:
Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the
business is closed.
Only the motion-activated parking lot lights will activate after closing.
--- - ---- --- - ------ ------
3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
One of our goals and purposes is to help the local community. We are planning to use some of
_ _ our green space to teach sustainable gardening. The property will enhance the aesthetics
of the area, as well as the character of the community.
4. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The building has a unique historic past It dates back to 1924 and was the original,speakeasy in
Clearwater, frequented by such personalities as Babe Ruth. We are restoring the buildinq while
maintaining its classic Florida look. The landscaping has been designed to conform to the
character of the building It will enhance the neighborhood in that many of the surrounding
properties are in disrepair. It is hoped that by bringing this building back to life others will begin
to restore surrounding properties.
5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
It is consistent with the Clearwater plan for the area.
--- ------- ----- - - --- ---------- - ------
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Sioature of property gwner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swo o and subscribed before me is day of
A.D. 20 to me and/or by
L Ywho_1S ergo
a y ?gvgn has
11
produced C'LJ
as identification.
Notary public,
My commission expires: ???',?/G?
Xo, L. aj`I
? 'aoTAi?
My Comm Expires
Mar. 23, 2015
No. EE 77043
1P 130,1-
rF OF F1A
C:1Documents and Settingslga1elDesktoplCLC1CLC Comprehensive Landscape.doc
Page 2 of 2
•
Est Elevation
•
Obrth Elevation
•
•
•
•
•
:ommunity
0
Trim
SW 7676
Paper Lantern
New color palette for CLC elevations, based on Sherwin Williams colors
Building Base
SW 7680
Lanyard
Building Field
SW 7687
August Moon
Learning Center
Exhibit O
Height to top of
flat roof =
approx 14'
O
m
m
0
•
Sest Elevation
A&
Outh Elevation
•
TrIm
SW 7676
7676
Paper Lantern
• New color palette for CLC elevations, based on Sherwin Williams colors
•
•
•
:ommunity Learning Center
0
Existing Building materials remain unchanged,
d
ed
Existing Building materials remain unchanged.
d
tone
o top of
14'
Building Base
SW 7680
Lanyard
Building Field
SW 7687
August Moon