CONSULTING SERVICES - DREW STREET WIDENING - FROM FORT HARRISON AVENUE TO NORTHEAST COACHMAN ROAD
I
I
DREW STREET WIDENING
FROM FT. HARRISON AVE. TO NORTHEAST COACHMAN ROAD
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY AND ENGINEER
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this /0 o.A day of 1\,f~ . 1991, by and
between the City of Clearwater, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the CITY, and Post, Buckley,
Schuh and Jernigan, Inc., Tampa, Florida, a corporation licensed and authorized to do business
in Florida, hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the CITY proposes to widen Drew Street from just west of Ft. Harrison Ave. to just
east of Northeast Coachman Road in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation.
The CITY has agreed with the Florida Department of Transportation to prepare preliminary design
reports and construction contract documents including construction plans and specifications in
conformance with the requirements of the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal
Highway Administration; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation, District 7 has verbally agreed to
recommend the inclusion of this project in Mure FOOT District 7 fiscal planning and to construct
the Drew Street widening project when FOOT funding becomes available. The FOOT, District 7
has prepared the initial scope of work for the preparation of a Project, Development, and
Environmental (P,D and E) Study; and
WHEREAS, the CITY proposes to do certain work related to Drew Street Widening in
coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation as described in EXHIBIT A; and
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the ENGINEER to perform certain professional services
pertinent to such work in accordance with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the ENGINEER desires to provide such professional services in accordance with
this Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will accrue
to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this Agreement. it is mutually understood and
agreed as follows:
1
ctl'~
V 7/f~
0:2 -"'II? -(J{)
/~ "
/ . )
<>'../"'''1
I
1
I. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT
The relationship of the ENGINEER to the CITY will be that of a professional consultant,
and the ENGINEER will provide the professional and technical services required under
this Agreement in accordance with acceptable engineering and planning practices and
ethical standards.
II. PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
It shall be the responsibility of the ENGINEER to work with the CITY and apprise it of
solutions to engineering, planning and design problems and the approach or techniques
to be used towards accomplishment of the CITY'S objectives as set forth in EXHIBIT A.
The ENGINEER will coordinate all of the work with the requirements of the Florida
Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. The scope of
services to be provided to accomplish the CITY'S objectives is set forth in EXHIBIT A.
III. PERIOD OF SERVICE
A. The ENGINEER will begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of
this Agreement; such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed. This
Agreement shall be for a term of three (3) years, renewable for three (3) years
thereafter, and extended further by mutual consent of the CITY and ENGINEER.
B. If the ENGINEER'S design services called for under this Agreement are delayed
for reasons beyond the ENGINEER'S control, the time of performance shall be
adjusted appropriately. If the design services under this Agreement continue past
Oct. 1994, the fees contained in EXHIBIT B shall be subject to renegotiation; any
change in such fees shall apply only to the unfinished services as of the effective
date of such change.
IV. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. All original sketches, tracings, drawings, computations, details, design calculations
and other documents and plans that result from the ENGINEER'S services under
this Agreement are and remain the property of the ENGINEER as instruments of
service. Where such documents are required to be filed with governmental
agencies, the ENGINEER will furnish copies to the CITY upon request.
B. The CITY may, at its expense, obtain a set of reproducible copies of any maps
and/or drawings prepared for it by the ENGINEER in consideration of which the
CITY agrees that no additions, deletions, changes or revisions shall be made
without the express written approval of the ENGINEER.
2
l
I
I
D. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall procure and maintain for the life
of this Agreement, Professional Liability insurance. This insurance shall provide coverage
against such liability resulting from this contract/project. The minimum limits of coverage
shall be $1,000,000.
E. Indemnity. In consideration of the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, payable as part of the first payment for services, the
ENGINEER agrees to defend, save and hold the CITY, it agents, assigns and employees,
harmless from all claims or causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, and all
judgements whatsoever, involving personal injury, bodily injury, death, or property damage,
arising out of any negligent or intentional act or omission, or the violation of any federal,
state or local law or regulations by the ENGINEER, its subcontractors, agents, assigns,
invitees or employees in connection with this Agreement.
F. Limitation of Liability. The CITY agrees to limit the ENGINEER'S liability to the CITY
and to all construction contractors and subcontractors on the project due to the
ENGINEER'S negligent acts, errors or omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of
the ENGINEER to all those named shall not exceed the amount covered by the insurance
contract or the ENGINEER'S total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is
greater.
G. Hazardous Substances. It is understood and agreed that in seeking the professional services
of the ENGINEER under this Agreement, the CITY does not request the ENGINEER to
undertake uninsurable or potentially uninsurable obligations for the CITY'S benefit
involving or related in any manner to hazardous substances. Therefore, the ENGINEER
undertakes no such obligation hereunder, and the CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify,
and defend the ENGINEER from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, liability,
and costs arising out of or in any way connected with the presence, discharge, release, or
escape of contaminants or hazardous substances of any kind, or environmental liability of
any nature, in any manner related to services performed by the ENGINEER under this
Agreement.
H. Supplemental Provisions. The insurances coverages and conditions afforded by the above
mentioned policies shall not be suspended, voided, canceled or modified except after thirty
(30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to
both the Public Works Director and the Risk Management Offices of the CITY.
Certificates of Insurance meeting the specific required insurance provisions specified within
this Contract/Agreement shall be forwarded to both the Public Works Director and Risk
Management Offices of the CITY and approved prior to the start of any work. Mter
review, the Certificate will be filed with the City Clerk as a part of the official contract file.
5
I
I
Receipt and acceptance of the ENGINEER Certificate of Insurance, or other similar
document does not constitute acceptance or approval of amounts or types of
coverages which may be less than required by this Agreement.
The CITY may at its option require a copy of the Engineer/Consultants Insurance
Policies.
I. Safety and Health Requirements. It is the ENGINEER'S sole duty to provide
safe and healthful working conditions to its employees on and about the site of
Agreement Performance. The CITY assumes no duty for supervision of the
ENGINEER. The ENGINEER will provide a "Drug Free" workplace in accordance
with Section 287-987, Florida Statutes.
The CITY may order that the work stop if a condition of immediate danger to CITY
employees, equipment or property damage exists. This provision shall not shift
responsibility of risk of loss for injuries or damage sustained from the ENGINEER
to the CITY, and the ENGINEER shall remain solely responsible for compliance
with all safety requirements and for the safety of all persons and property at the
site of ENGINEER performance until the beginning of construction and arising out
of the ENGINEER'S negligence.
The ENGINEER shall comply with the standards and regulations set forth by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Florida Department
of Labor and Employment Security, and all other appropriate federal, state, and
local regulations or City safety and health standards.
VI. COMPENSATION
The ENGINEER shall be compensated for all services rendered under this Agreement
in accordance with the provisions of EXHIBIT B.
VII. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days prior written notice,
in the event of substantial failure to perform in accordance with the terms hereof by the
other party through no fault of the terminating party. If the Agreement is terminated, the
ENGINEER shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of EXHIBIT B for all work
performed up to the date of termination.
VIII. SUSPENSION. CANCELLATION OR ABANDONMENT
In the event the project described in EXHIBIT A, or the services of the ENGINEER called
for under this Agreement, is/are suspended, canceled or abandoned by the CITY, the
ENGINEER shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice of such action and shall be
compensated for the professional services provided and/or related fees for which there
is an irreversible obligation up to the date of suspension, cancellation or abandonment.
6
I
1
IX. ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
The initial work contemplated in this agreement is the preparation of a preliminary design
report known as a Project, Development and Environmental (P,D, & E) Study. Future
work contemplated in this agreement for the Drew Street Widening project is the
preparation of construction contract documents including construction plans and
specifications, right-of-way maps, easement and property descriptions, FDOT Joint Project
Agreements for the relocation of utilities, permit applications, record drawings for utility
relocations, certifications and other such professional services which may be necessary
for the successful completion of this project in coordination with the Florida Department
of Transportation. When such services are desired by the CITY, the CITY and the
ENGINEER reserve the right to negotiate amendments to this agreement for these
professional services.
X. ATTACHMENTS
The following Exhibits are attached to this Agreement and made a part hereof.
Exhibit "A" - Scope of Services, p. A 1 through A50.
Exhibit "B" - Method of Compensation, p. B1 through B3.
7
I
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this
Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated on the day and year first written
above.
ENGINEER:
CITY:
POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
5300 West Cypress Street, Suite 300
Tampa, FL 33607
BY aJ~A~~
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
112 Osceola Avenue South
Clearwater, Florida 34616
\';'0....-.-.
DATE
ATTEST:
(l~ ~~ E.'~ I't ~~.
~rk >
Approved as to Form- & Correctness
City Attorney
DATE
agrment.tcj
8
4=5PV-
I
I
EXHIBIT "A"
DREW STREET/SR 590
FROM FORT HARRISON/ALT 19/5R 595 TO NE COACHMAN
SCOPE OF SERVICES
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
WPA NO.: 7117121
F.A.P. NO.: M-1464(9)
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE OF SERVICES
State Project No.: 15050-1501
WPA No.: 7117121
F.A.P. No.: M-1464(9)
I . DESCRIPTION
I I . SUMMARY OF SERVICES
III. PURPOSE
IV. STUDY OBJECTIVE
V. SERVICES TO BE PERFOMED
A. Project Initiation
I
Paqe Number
A-1
A-1
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-3
1. Notice-to-Proceed Meeting A-3
2. Public Involvement Plan A-4
3. Prepare and Distribute Advance
Notification Package A-4
4. Introductory or Kickoff Meeting A-5
B. Surveys
1. Field Surveys
2. Aerial Survey
C. Engineering Data Collection
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-6
1. Existing Highway Characteristics A-6
2. Traffic A-8
3. Accident A-9
D. Environmental Data Collection
1. Social and Economic Impacts
2. Natural and Physical Impacts
3. Utilities
4. Transportation Plans
5. Permit Coordination
6. Biological Assessment
7. Relocation Impact
8. Noise Impact Analysis
9. Air Quality Impact Analysis
10. Hazardous Materials
11. ArcheologicaljHistorical Assessment
A-9
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-12
A-12
A-12
A-13
A-13
A-14
A-16
I
I
Paae Nwnber
E. Project Design Analysis
1.
Corridor Analysis
2.
Conceptual Design Analysis
a. Establish Design Traffic Volumes
b. Traffic Analysis
c. Traffic Technical Memorandum
d. Develop Design Alternatives
(1) Typical Section
(2) Alignment
(3) Hydraulic Analysis
(Location Hydraulic Report)
(4) Conceptual Pond Location
Report
(5) Soils
(6) Structures
(7) Prepare Design Alternatives
A-24
A-24
A-25
A-25
A-26
A-27
A-27
A-27
A-28
A-29
A-29
A-31
A-31
A-32
3. Comparative Analysis of Feasible
Design Alternatives A-32
a. Comparative Analysis A-32
b. Consideration and Resolution of
Engineering Items A-33
c. Selection of Alternatives A-34
d. Conceptual Design Plans A-34
e. Identify Construction Segments A-34
f. Value Engineering Multi-discipline
Team Review A-34
g. Project Team Review A-35
F. Preliminary Engineering Report A-35
1. First Draft Engineering Report A-35
2. Submit Second Draft Engineering
Report A-37
3. Final Preliminary Engineering
Report A-37
G. Environmental Documents A-38
1. Preparation of Air and Noise Impact
Reports A-38
2. Submit Wetlands Evaluation Report A-38
3. Prepare Environmental Data Report A-39
4. Prepare Environmental Determination A-39
VII.
VIII.
XI.
I
H. Public Meetings
1. Public Involvement
a. Mailing List Preparation
b. Identify and Inspect Public
Meeting Sites
c. Collect Public Input
2. Alternatives Public Meeting
3. Coordination Meetings with Local
Officials
4. Comments and Coordination Report
5. Public Hearing
6. LocationjDesign Acceptance and
Public Notice
VI.
STUDY REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR
WORK
A. Governing Regulations
B. Project Schedule
C. Key Personnel
D. Progress Reporting
E. Unscheduled Meetings and Presentations
F. Correspondence
G. Liaison Office
SUBMITTALS
OPTIONAL SERVICES
IX.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY
X.
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE
DEPARTMENT
BEGINNING AND LENGTH OF SERVICES
I
Paqe Number
A-39
A-39
A-40
A-41
A-41
A-42
A-44
A-44
A-44
A-45
A-45
A-45
A-46
A-47
A-47
A-47
A-47
A-47
A-48
A-48
A-49
A-50
A-50
I
I
WPA NO.:
STATE PROJECT NO.:
7117121
15050-0000
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
FOR DREW STREET/SR 590
PINELLAS COUNTY
This Exhibit forms an integral part of the Consultant Agreement
between the City of Clearwater and the Consultant relative to the
transportation facility referred to as follows:
State Project No. 15050-1501
Work Program Item No. 7117121
F.A.P. No. M-1464(9)
Common Name: Drew Street/SR 590 from Fort Harrison/Alt.
19/5R 595 to Northeast Coachman, Pinellas
Count v
I. DESCRIPTION
The proposed study
west of Alternate
Coachman Road. The
3.0 miles.
limits for Drew Street shall extend from
19/Fort Harrison to east of Northeast
total length of the study is approximately
I I . SUMMARY OF SERVICES
The Drew Street Section will serve as a minor east/west
arterial in Pinellas County. The study will examine
al ternatives for the transportation facility to provide an
acceptable level of service to serve the existing and proj ected
traffic demand in Central Pinellas County.
The alternatives should as a minimum consist of upgrading the
existing four-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided
arterial with improved intersections. Alternatives will
consider the use of a center two-way left turn lane versus a
raised median.
III. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work
and responsibilities required for Project Planning (Corridor
*Location), Preliminary Engineering (Conceptual Design), and
Environmental Studies necessary for Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) LocationjDesign Acceptance of proposed
improvements to the herein described transportation facility.
A-I
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
J
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
The CONSULTANT shall perform those engineering services
required for location/design studies, including consideration
of all social, economic, environmental effects, and mitigation
as required by the FHWA and/or the Florida Department of
Transportation (herein referred to as the DEPARTMENT), along
with the required environmental analysis reports, engineering
reports, and public hearing.
The CITY will provide contract administration and provide
management services of the work performed by the CONSULTANT.
Technical reviews of all work associated with the development
and preparation of the engineering/environmental study reports
for the transportation facility will be provided by the CITY
and the DEPARTMENT.
IV. STUDY OBJECTIVE
The general objective of the study is to provide documented
information necessary for the City and the DEPARTMENT to reach
a decision on the type, design, and location of multi-lane
improvements related to the transportation facility described
herein. All factors related to the design and location of the
facility must be considered including transportation needs,
social impacts, economic factors, environmental impacts, and
engineering analysis.
The specific objective of the study is to prepare a series of
reports documenting the requirements for preliminary design,
including existing and predicted conditions, typical sections,
right-of-way requirements, environmental impacts, and costs of
the alternatives. The CONSULTANT shall evaluate the
alternatives and make recommendations as to the best
alternative. The documentation shall be developed to, and in
compliance with, all applicable State and Federal regulations
including Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes, and all
applicable State and local long range transportation plans, the
Federal Aid Highway Program Manual issuances governing the
content and development of this type study, and the
DEPARTMENT's Proj ect Development and Environmental Manual,
(PD&El Guidelines Manual. The Study information shall be
objective and complete. The CONSULTANT is encouraged to seek
and bring to the attention of the CITY and DEPARTMENT
unforeseen information and issues which are relevant to the
proj ect decision. The CONSULTANT shall abstain from indicating
preferences for any alternative prior to the public hearing
unless specifically requested to do so by the CITY or
DEPARTMENT .
A-2
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
J
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
V. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
The CONSULTANT is responsible for preparing a series of
Environmental Analysis Reports, an Engineering Document,
Conceptual Design Plans for the entire project that are
acceptable to the CITY, the DEPARTMENT and the FHWA and shall
provide all other services as set forth in this Exhibit. In
addition, the CONSULTANT shall respond to third party requests
for information relative to the proj ect or services being
performed at the direction and with approval of the CITY.
The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary coordination with
Federal, State, and local agencies which would have an
influence upon the study and the preparation of the
environmental reports as directed by the CITY or DEPARTMENT.
This coordination will specifically include regular contact
with local government's engineering and planning staff
throughout the life of the study.
The CONSULTANT may be called upon to prepare the content of
letters from CITY or DEPARTMENT personnel to other agencies,
public officials and interested citizens.
The CONSULTANT shall mark development plans per individual
property owner request regarding the effect of the project on
the property in question as directed by the CITY or DEPARTMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall make maximum use of existing information
available from State, regional, local agencies, private sources
and his own files.
At the CITY's option, the CONSULTANT may be required to provide
all or part of the final design and plans preparation services.
(See Section VIII Optional Services of this Exhibit.)
A. Proiect Initiation
1. Notice-to-Proceed Meetina
The CITY and DEPARTMENT shall conduct a Notice-to-
Proceed meeting with the CONSULTANT immediately
following receipt of his Notice-to-Proceed letter.
This meeting may include, but not be limited to, the
following City and DEPARTMENT personnel as well as the
CONSULTANT's representative.
District Director of Production
District PD&E Administrator
District Environmental Administrator
A-3
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
District Project Manager
City Engineer
City Manager
City Assistant Manager
City Project Manager
Mayor
City Commission
The CONSULTANT representation should include as a
minimum the project manager and the assistant project
manager. The purpose of this introductory meeting is
four fold:
a. The CITY and DEPARTMENT will render all relevant
information in its possession. This may include
previous correspondence, traffic figures, planning
information, and existing right-of-way and utility
information.
b. The CITY and DEPARTMENT will establish any ground
rules upon which the study process will be
conducted.
c. The CITY will explain the financial administration
of the contract.
d. The CITY will render the official Notice-to-
Proceed letter.
2. Public Involvement Plan
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Public Involvement Plan
in accordance with Part 1, Chapter 8 of the Proiect
Development & Environmental (PD&E) Guidelines Manual.
Within ten (10) working days after the Notice-to-
Proceed Meeting, the CONSULTANT shall submit a draft
Public Involvement Plan to the CITY and DEPARTMENT for
approval.
3. Prepare and Distribute Advance Notification Packaae
The CONSULTANT shall prepare and distribute an
advanced notification package in accordance with Part
1, Chapter 2 and all applicable chapters in Part 2 of
the PD&E Guidelines Manual.
A-4
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
4. Introductorv or Kickoff Meetina
A second notification in the form of an introductory
or kickoff meeting shall also be held by the
CONSULTANT with County, CITY, MFO, Expressway
Authority, and elected officials to introduce the
CONSULTANT and inform local government of the
initiation of the study. The CONSULTANT shall prepare
maps of the study area for orientation purposes, and
provide the DEPARTMENT with a summary of any meeting
with these agencies. Additional contacts shall be
maintained throughout the study process where
appropriate. For the kickoff meeting the CONSULTANT
shall:
a. Notify officials and interested parties by letter,
news releases, telephone, or any other appropriate
means.
b. Prepare formal presentation - script, graphics,
displays.
c. Deliver the presentation using knowledgeable staff
members, including answering questions.
d. Meeting site preparation -- setup and breakdown of
audiovisual equipment.
B. Surveys
1. Field Surveys
Locate aerial photo identifiable control points along
the project corridor by field survey methods.
The control points shall be sufficient to provide
minimally controlled aerial photographs.
2. Aerial Survey:
Aerial survey shall be used as a basis for plotting
various data necessary for. engineering and
environmental analysis, alternative corridor and
design studies, and the development of conceptual
design. Copies of aerial survey are the prime source
of information used to convey project considerations
to the public at public meetings. The following types
and scale of uncontrolled aerial survey are
anticipated in the PD&E phase:
1" = 200' Black and White Reproducibles -
Drainage and Corridor Analysis
1" = 50' Black and White Reproducibles -
Concept Design Plans
A-5 (09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
The CONSULTANT shall obtain approval of aerial photo
limits from the CITY and the DEPARTMENT before
production of project mylars.
C. Enaineerina Data Collection
Immediately following the Notice to Proceed, the
CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments of the
study corridor from an engineering standpoint.
This activity consists of collecting various information
and materials relative to engineering concerns within the
study area. The information shall include data necessary
to perform adequate evaluation of the location and design
of a transportation facility.
1. Existina Hiahwav Characteristics
Data includes all pertinent physical features and
condition ratings which define the existing highway
segment under consideration. Some of this information
is available from the DEPARTMENT. Other sources may
be from field observation and personal interviews with
officials and the general public.
DEPARTMENT sources include project files, old plans,
right-of-way maps, bridge books, bridge logs, straight
line diagrams, computer programs, and old drainage
maps as available. The following classes of data
shall be obtained:
a. Roadwav
Roadway characteristics shall include, but are not
limited to, those items described below:
(1) Typical Sections - Number and width of
each cross-section element and access
features.
(2) Existing roadway right-of-way - Obtain
all available right-of-way information
for proj ect limits from the DEPARTMENT
and/or from city and consultant offices.
(3) Other right-of-way - Identify additional
right-of-way at intersection locations i
drainage easements, etc.
A-6
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
( 4) Property 1 ines - Obtain existing property
lines.
(5)
Pedestrian facilities
crosswalk, handicapped
school routes.
Walkways,
provisions, and
(6) Bicycle facilities - Nwnber, type, and
width, designated or undesignated.
(7)
Lighting Type, location,
maintenance responsibility.
spacing,
(8) Traffic signals - Identify those traffic
signal locations necessary to perform
capacity analysis, obtain signal timing
and phasing.
(9) Posted speed Identify posted speed
throughout project limits.
(10) Railroad crossing Check for any
Railroad abandonment plans. Determine
the following: Nwnber of tracks and
type, nwnber of trains, speed, length of
trains, passenger, freight, type of
warning device, time of day, etc.
(11) Structural and operational conditions -
Obtain structural and operational ratings
and engineering rating throughout project
limits (available from the DEPARTMENT).
(12) Drainage systems inventory Identify
existing drainage systems listing types
and discharge points.
(13) Alignment Obtain horizontal and
vertical alignment as necessary. Review
sight distances.
(14) Intersection Design Channelization,
turning lane arrangement.
b. Bridqe:
(1) Typical Section - Lane width, overall
clear width.
A-7
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(2) Type structure - Timber, concrete, steel,
loading.
(3) Condition - Obtain structural rating of
condition; obtain evaluation from the
District Bridge Inspection as to the
suitability for widening.
(4) Horizontal and vertical clearance.
(S) Span arrangement - Number and length of
spans.
(6) Channel data - Alignment, width, depth,
maintenance program area of hydraulic
opening at structure.
(7) Bridge Number.
2. Traffic
Traffic data are the basis for determining the need
for the proj ect and the number of lanes required
through application of highway capacity analysis.
Additionally, the traffic data are used to predict
noise levels and air quality.
a. The CONSULTANT shall select and propose to the
DEPARTMENT three (3) traffic count control
stations for 7-day traffic machine counts
(directional volumes at IS-minute increments).
After concurrence by the CITY and the DEPARTMENT
on these count locations, the CONSULTANT will
conduct the counts and analyze the resulting data
to determine daily peak hours and percent daily
variation from the peak day.
b. The CONSULTANT shall furnish 24-hour machine
counts (approach volumes at IS-minute increments),
4-hour manual turning movement counts including
pedestrian and bicycle counts at the following
locations as a minimum:
Fort HarrisonjDrew Street
Garden AvenuejDrew Street
Myrtle StreetjDrew Street
North GreenwoodjDrew Street
Missouri AvenuejDrew Street
Betty LanejDrew Street
Highland AvenuejDrew Street
A-8
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
Saturn AvenuejDrew Street
Hercules AvenuejDrew Street
Northeast CoachrnanjDrew Street
BelcherjDrew Street
c. The CONSULTANT shall conduct manual pedestrian and
bicycle counts at two (2) locations to be proposed
by the CONSULTANT and approved by the DEPARTMENT.
The counts will be for four hours and will be done
on four days having fair weather. Two days of
these counts will be done during the week (Monday-
Friday) 2-hours during the a.m. peak and 2-hours
during he p.m. peak and two weekend days
(Saturday-Sunday) during four hours to be agreed
upon by the CONSULTANT and the DEPARTMENT. The
manual pedestrian and bicycle counts will be
conducted in accordance with the 1986 Bicycle
Usaae Trend Proaram.
3. Accident
Obtain available data from DEPARTMENT's computer
(Program numbers AARPJ12 and AARPJ13) and local
sources for various highway segments as required.
Obtain data for the latest five years.
a. Number of accidents - type, location, etc.
b. Fatalities - number
c. Injuries - number
d. Property damage - cost
e. Economic loss - cost
D. Environmental Data Collection
Immediately following the Notice to Proceed, the
CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments of the
study corridor from an environmental standpoint. This
task is largely of a data gathering nature.
This activity consists of collecting various information
and materials relative to the social, economic, and
environmental concerns within the study area. The
CONSULTANT shall maintain an inventory of pertinent
development occurring through the duration of the study,
and keep aerial photography updated accordingly.
1. Social and Economic Impacts
a. Cultural Features and Community Services
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
A-9
(09-30-91)-
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
b. Land Use
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
2. Natural and Physical Impacts
a. Wetlands
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 18 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual. (The Wetland Evaluation
Technique (WET) II shall be used.)
b. Outstandina Florida Waters
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 21 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
c. Floodplains
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 24 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
d. Floodwavs
Identify all floodways using floodway maps and
information from Local Agencies and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
e. Drainaae
The history and past hydraulic performance should
be noted on all structures. Obtain any stormwater
management or master drainage plans prepared by
local authorities.
(1) Bridges and CuI verts: Determine the
hydrologic basin characteristics, such as
size, topography and land use both future
and existing. Inventory of immediate
upstream and downstream structures.
(2) Storm Drain Systems: Inventory the
existing storm drain systems, note their
type, and size the hydrologic basins they
serve and the discharge points.
f. Soils
Obtain information to identify soils-related
problem areas along the developed alternative(s)
A-10
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
using USGS hydrologic maps, county soil survey
maps, field reviews, and other information from
the Soil Conservation Service and detailed soil
surveys as needed to perform the engineering
analysis and determine the impacts of the proj ect.
g. Floral and Faunal Communities
(1) Floral Communities - Obtain information
to generally describe the proj ect area
and to more specifically describe the
area within the proposed right-of-way
limits including common names and Latin
Binomials for dominant and/or
representative species. Quantify area
that will be impacted both directly
(within the right-of-way) and indirectly
(ecotone encroachment, etc.)
(2) Faunal Communities - Make note of fauna
observed in field while collecting other
information. Outline what species might
be expected to be found based on flora,
etc. Treatment of this subject should be
dependent on its significance on a case
basis.
h. Farmlands
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 28 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
i. Endanqered and Threatened Species
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 27 of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
j. Four 4 (f) Lands
Determine the location of any 4 (f) lands within
the project limits and any impacts or avoidance
alternative associated with these properties.
3. Utilities
In accordance with Part 2,
Guidelines Manual.
Chapter 10 of the PD&E
A-II
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
4. Transportation Plans
Obtain plans for all modes of transportationi surface,
transit and non-motorized modes.
a. Urban Area Transportation Study.
b. Local plansi city and county.
c. Transiti rail, bus, other.
d. Non-Motorized Modes, including bikeways and
pedestrian walk-ways. Interview local officials
and identify the following factors: Existing and
proj ected user types i Generators attracting users i
Existing and anticipated hazardsi high accident
locations.
5. Permit Coordination
In accordance with Part 1, Chapter 10 of the PD&:E
Guidelines Manual.
6. Bioloqical Assessment
This task consists of obtaining any additional
biological information determined to be necessary for
the environmental study and not previously included.
Included may be such items as sampling of river bottom
for manatee food source, visually pin-pointing an
eagle's nest if it is close to the 1500 foot critical
distance, coordination with FEMA for additional
floodplain information, etc.
7. Relocation Impact
Develop conceptual Right-of-Way, Business Damage and
Relocation Cost Estimates to make preliminary
assessments of the feasibility of alternatives. In
assessing the feasibility of alternatives, the
CONSULTANT shall:
a. Note neighborhoods, economic, and racial/ethnic
groups.
b. Determine probable number of residential, business
and non-profit organization relocations.
DEPARTMENT to provide all cost data.
A-12
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
8. Noise Impact Analvsis
Obtain information concerning existing year and future
design year noise levels and noise-related
characteristics of existing activities.
a. Determine noise sensitive sites along the
alignment(s). These could include historic sites
or districts, residences, motels, churches,
schools, libraries, hospitals and other'sites
requiring a quiet atmosphere.
b. After the noise impact methodology meeting,
monitor existing noise and traffic volume and
speed levels concurrently at representative noise
sensitive sites adjacent to the alignment(s). The
sites should be next to a free-flow section, and
where roadway sections with different speeds
and/or ADT exist to validate the noise model.
Noise readings shall be taken with an ANSI-
approved type 2 (or better) noise meter according
to procedures described in "Sound Procedures for
Measurina Hiahwav Noise: Final Report", FHWA-DP-
45-1R, August 1981 and in Chapter 17 of the PD&E
Guidelines.
9. Air Oualitv Impact Analvsis
After the air quality impact analysis methodology
meeting, obtain information concerning existing air
pollution levels in the proj ect area and prepare a
detailed air quality assessment for all "build"
al ternatives as well as for the "No-Action"
alternative.
a. Determine the "worst case" part of the proj ect
(usually at the most congested intersection) by
obtaining and comparing for each major
intersection: peak hour traffic volumes, speeds,
and distances to nearby reasonable receptor sites.
Make this determination for both the first year
the proj ect is open to traffic and the design
year.
b. Use the data from the latest available traffic and
design data and revised (10/91) screening test per
Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Guidelines Manual
to determine if further analysis is required.
c. Use the desk top review procedure if the screening
test fails.
d. If the project does not pass the desk top review
procedure, obtain all data required for the use of
A-13
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
the computer programs MOBILE4.1 and CALINE3, their
successors, or equivalent programs approved by the
DEPARTMENT. Evaluate and refine all data so that
they are ready for the programs.
10. Hazardous Materials
The CONSULTANT shall identify, evaluate, and prepare
recommendations for the CITY AND DEPARTMENT concerning
potential hazardous waste and pollutant problems
associated with each proposed alignment per Part 2,
Chapter 22 of the PD&E Guidelines Manual, revised July 1,
1988 and PD&E Potential Risk Evaluation Guideline,
Revision #1, dated January 27, 1989.
a. Identification (Data Collection Process)
This task consists of the examination of each
alternative alignment to identify potential hazardous
waste and pollutant problems on sites located within,
partially within, or adjacent to proposed right-of-way
limits. This examination consists of, but is not
limited to:
(1) Physical Land Use Historv
Public record searches to identify the current
tenants and legal owners as well as past tenants
and the associated land usagejbusiness activities.
Coordinate this data with the appropriate aerial
surveYi
(2) Records Search
State and local environmental and health agency
visits to secure lists and other information about
the past and present users of hazardous materials,
generators of hazardous waste, pollutants,
industrial waste, solid waste, storage tanks
(above or below ground) as well as groundwater
contaminants. Report problems with their usage
(Notices of Violations, non-compliance documents,
Consent Orders, EDI files, etc.)i
(3) Visual Walk-Thru
On-site verification of acquired data for parcels
along the alternate alignments with particular
attention to site storage and handling, those
A-14
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
sites with changed land use, and previously
unrecorded/undocumented problems.
These research and field verification tasks should
yield a comprehensive parcel profile revealing any
likelihood or risk of waste or pollutant
contamination that could impact the proposed
highway development.
b. Evaluation (Risk Ranking)
This task consists of ranking the potential for
encountering hazardous waste or pollutants as a result
of our transportation improvement projects and their
associated land purchases and construction activities.
The data collection process should conclude with the
risk ranking of each parcel using the District Seven
PD&E Potential Contamination Risk Evaluation
Guideline. Point totals shall be recorded and level
of risk assigned.
c. Recommendations
After contamination potentials are identified and
evaluated the CONSULTANT shall develop recommendations
to the CITY and DEPARTMENT. These recommendations
shall be used in shaping the development of alignment
and right-of-way strategies (focusing on avoidance of
contamination) prior to selection of a "preferred"
alternative.
The CONSULTANT shall provide recommendations for any
additional evaluations or investigations on suspect
parcels to be completed prior to right-of-way
acquisition and construction.
Data collected, analyses, and recommendations made as
a result of these tasks shall be assembled by the
CONSULTANT in a technically and scientifically concise
Hazardous Materials and Pollutants Evaluation Report.
This report shall include an executive summary, a
narrative, tables, graphics, and appendices (parcel
profiles, violation summaries, correspondence, etc.),
to completely illustrate the screening effort.
A-15
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
11. Archaeoloaical/Historical Assessment
An archaeological and historical site assessment survey of
the preferred alignments(s) [including proposed stormwater
retention areas will be conducted for this project].
a. Purpose and Objectives
The assessment is intended to comply with the
provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966 (Public Law 89-665, as amended) and the
implementing regulations (36 CFR 800) as well as with
the provisions contained in the revised Chapter 267,
F. S . The purpose of the surveys is to locate,
identify, and bound any cultural resources,
prehistoric or historic, associated with this project
and to assess the significance of these resources in
terms of eligibility for listing on the National
Reaister of Historic Places (NRHP) according to
criteria set forth in 36 CFR Section 60.4.
The specific objectives of the surveys will be to:
(1) Identify any cultural resources
associated with the project that are
already listed on or that are previously
recorded as potentially eligible for
listing on the National Reaister of
Historic Places.
(2) Locate, identify, and bound any
additional cultural resources associated
with the project.
(3) Collect and document sufficient data from
each identified prehistoric or historic
resource to permit an assessment of its
significance in terms of eligibility for
listing on the National Reaister of
Historic Places.
(4) Provide a final report with appropriate
documentation detailing the results of
the survey and the final assessments of
resource significance. The report shall
include a Florida Master Site File Form
on all identified cultural resources and
a NRHP Determination of Eligibility (DOE)
package on all resources determined to be
significant. In the case of historic
resources, the DOE package shall include
A-16
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
a NRHP Registration Form
accompanying documentation.
with
All of the work conducted on the surveys
shall be coordinated with cul tural
resource management personnel of the FDOT
Environmental Management Office.
The CITY will provide contract
administration and management services.
The DEPARTMENT will provide technical
reviews of all work associated with the
development and preparation of the
cultural resource assessment surveys.
The DEPARTMENT will also coordinate this
project with the Federal Highway
Administration and the Florida DEPARTMENT
of State, Division of Historical
Resources.
b. Services to be Performed
The assessment survey shall be conducted along the
preferred alignment(s) of the Project.
The work elements to be accomplished are as
follows:
(1)
Conduct a Literature
Background Research.
Review
and
Archaeological and historical resource
documentation pertinent to project area
shall be identified and reviewed to
determine the types of cultural resources
present, their chronological
associations, locational patterning, and
other pertinent findings. Such
documentation shall include but not be
limited to cultural. resource survey
reports, comprehensive plan studies,
published books and journal articles, the
National Reaister of Historic Places, and
the Florida Master Site File and any
county or local site inventory.
This review shall also include, when
possible, information gathered from other
professionals in pertinent disciplines,
avocational archaeologists and
historians, and local residents of the
project area in question.
A-17
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(2) Prepare Archaeological, Historical, and
Environmental Overviews of the Proj ect
Area.
Archaeological Overview: A summary of
the area's prehistoric and historic
archaeology shall be prepared based on
the findings of the literature review and
other background research.
The overview shall identify the
chronological, functional, and locational
dimensions of the project area's
archaeological record, both prehistoric
and historic as well as provide a basis
to partition the project area into ranked
zones of archaeological site occurrence
potential, to analyze recovered cultural
data and to evaluate the significance of
archaeological sites occurring in the
project area.
Historical Overview: An overview of the
history of the proj ect area shall be
prepared based on the findings of the
1 i terature review and other background
research.
The overview shall identify the salient
events, locations, structures, and
individuals associated with the
development of the project area.
Particular attention shall be paid to
land use patterns and the historical
environment. The potential for
historical archaeological sites shall
also be addressed. The overview shall
provide a basis for evaluating the
significance of both historical and
architectural/ historical resources
occurring in the project area.
Environmental Overview: An overview of
the project area's salient environmental
features shall be prepared including a
description of the area's topography,
geology, hydrology, pedology, and
vegetative associations.
A-18
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
The description shall include a
discussion of past and present
environmental configurations in terms of
relationships to the occurrence or
potential occurrence of prehistoric and
historic cultural resources.
(3) Prepare a Research Design for the
Project.
Using data provided by the literature
review, general background research, the
archaeological, historical, and
environmental overviews developed, and
other pertinent sources of information, a
research design shall be generated for
the project.
The research design is the overall plan
for conducting the survey and
interpreting its results.
It should identify the basic types of
cultural resources that may be present in
the survey area and outline the methods,
techniques, and knowledge necessary to
locate, identify, and evaluate them. The
research design shall also provide an
appreciation of the cultural resources
present or expected in the survey area in
terms of broader, regional cultural
resource patterning. The research design
shall reflect the guidelines as set forth
in 36 CFR Part 66 and in "The Historic
Preservation Compliance Review Program"
guide (revised September 1990)
promulgated by the Florida Division of
Historical Resources.
The research design shall be submitted to
the Administrator, Environmental Analysis
and Technical Policy Section, of the FDOT
Environmental Office for approval prior
to the initiation of field work. A
meeting attended by all pertinent parties
will be required to discuss the submitted
research design and its implications for
the project.
(4) Conduct a Field Survey of the Proj ect
Area.
A-19
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
A cultural resource field assessment
survey of the project area shall be
conducted. The survey shall employ both
surface and subsurface testing techniques
to locate, identify, and evaluate the
significance of cultural resources
occurring in the project area.
The intensity of field testing shall be
keyed to ranked probability zones (high,
medium, low) of possible cultural
resource occurrence based on paleo-
environmental data, the occurrence of
known sites, historic land use patterns
and other pertinent information.
Subsurface testing in these ranked zones
shall adhere to standards set forth in
the guidelines promulgated by the Florida
Division of Historical Resources (see
"the Historic Preservation Compliance
Review Program" guide revised September,
1990) .
Testing in areas of high site probability
shall proceed at approximately 25 meter
intervals and in areas of moderate site
potential at approximately 50 meter
intervals.
Testing in low probability areas should
generally proceed on a judgmental basis
with at least ten percent of such areas
subj ected to testing. Judgmental testing
shall also be employed in areas of high
and moderate site potential as
appropriate. When cultural resources are
located, additional testing should be
conducted at intervals necessary to
adequately define the resource.
Subsurface tests shall be .5 meters in
diameter and dug to a minimum, subsurface
conditions permitting, of one meter. All
spoil from excavated tests shall be
sifted through 1/4 inch metal hardware
cloth.
Any cultural materials recovered from
either surface or subsurface testing
shall be stored in plastic bags and
properly labeled as to provenience. Any
organic materials recovered in testing
A-20
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
1
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
such as faunal and floral materials shall
be stabilized, if necessary, and
preserved for future analysis. In the
event that historic structures are
encountered on a survey, each site shall
be properly mapped and photographed, the
estimated date of construction and
architectural style determined, and its
architectural- historical significance
evaluated. In addition, archaeological
subsurface testing shall be conducted in
an attempt to detect any subsurface
artifacts or features associated with the
historical structure.
In order to identify
historic/architectural resources a
reconnaissance survey of the standing
structures along the project corridor
shall be undertaken. As part of this
effort, the CONSULTANT shall inspect all
structures along the project corridor in
order to properly evaluate the historical
or architectural significance of each
property. When appropriate, informant
interviews should be conducted concerning
any potential cultural resources
identified.
In addition, any necessary primary and
secondary source research will be
conducted to supplement the information
obtained during the field survey.
This background research shall include
local information, materials kept by the
DEPARTMENT of State in Tallahassee and
elsewhere, and any other regional, state,
or Federal repositories.
Documentation: A Florida Master Site
File form shall be completed on every
prehistoric or historic cultural resource
identified in the assessment survey.
A National Reaister
Determination of
package shall be
prehistoric and
resource considered
of Historic Places
Eligibility (DOE)
completed on each
historic cultural
to be a significant
A-21
(09-30-91) .
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
resource according to criteria
established by law (see Federal Register,
CFR No. 18, Vol. 39, Part III, pp. 3369-
3370). In the case of historic
resources, the DOE package shall include
a NRHP Registration Form with
accompanying documentation. Maps,
drawings, and photographs shall be used,
as appropriate, in the documentation of
the cultural resources addressed in the
assessment process. Field notes
documenting the progress of the
assessment survey shall be maintained.
These notes shall include the type and
number of tests conducted, a brief
description of artifacts or features
encountered in testing, soils
information, and other information
pertinent to the assessment survey. All
subsurface tests and areas of surface
examination shall be clearly marked on
aerial photographs of the project area.
(5) Process, Analyze, and Catalogue.
Recovered Cultural Materials Laboratory
processing shall consist of artifact
cleaning, stabilization (if required),
packaging, and storage. Laboratory
analysis shall consist of the
morphological and functional (if
possible) classification of artifacts
and, if diagnostic, the establishment of
their cul tural/temporal affiliations.
Proper and detailed documentation of
artifact provenience, number, type,
description shall be maintained.
Artifacts will eventually be transferred
to the CITY by the CONSULTANT pending a
decision on their final disposition.
(6) Prepare Report Documenting the Results of
the Cultural Resource Assessment.
A draft report presenting the methods,
findings, evaluations, and
recommendations of the cultural resource
assessment of the entire project shall be
prepared and submitted to the FDOT
A-22
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
)
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
Environmental Office for review and
comments.
The report shall be so prepared as to
conform to the standards set forth in
FDOT Project Development and Environment
Guidelines (Part 2, Chapter 12 revised)
as well as to the standards embodied in
the Florida Division of Historical
Resource's "Historic Preservation
Compliance Review Program" guide revised
(September 1990). Following the review
of the document and receipt of FDOT
comments, a final report shall be
submitted to FDOT within a time frame
negotiated by the CITY, FDOT and the
CONSULTANT.
In addition to the final report on the
proj ect, the CONSULTANT shall provide
periodic status reports to FDOT
documenting the progress of the cultural
resource assessment. These reports shall
include information on survey findings,
scheduling, potential problems, and other
information deemed pertinent.
c. Qualifications Standards
Personnel shall meet the minimum criteria for
archaeologists, historians, architectural
historians and other professionals as set forth in
the Secretarv of the Interior's Standards and
Guidelines for Archeoloav and Historic
Preservation and 36 CFR 61. Resumes of the
Principal Investigator, other supervisory
personnel, and consultants documenting their
qualifications to conduct work in their stated
area of expertise must be submi~ted for review and
approval by the DEPARTMENT.
If sub- consul tants are to be hired as needed
during the course of the project then
documentation concerning these professionals shall
be provided at the appropriate time for review and
approval by FDOT.
The proposed participation of the above
individuals in projects is subject to approval by
the Administrator, Environmental Analysis and
A-23
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
Technical Policy Section, FDOT Environmental
Office based on their meeting the minimum
qualifications for such work as stated in the
above mentioned guidelines and based on a review
of their work history.
Any change of any of the above mentioned employees
occurring during the performance of the contract
must have the prior approval of the Administrator,
Environmental Analysis and Technical Policy
Section, FDOT Environmental Office. All of the
qualified personnel assigned to a project should
perform proj ect activities directly related to
their specific area of expertise.
The CONSULTANT shall also:
(1) Provide or demonstrate access to adequate
field and laboratory equipment necessary
to complete the work required for the
project.
(2)
Provide or demonstrate
facilities necessary for
treatment, analysis, and
specimens recovered from the
adequate
the proper
storage of
proj ect.
(3) FDOT schedul ing requirements require that
each project be completed in a timely and
efficient manner. The CONSULTANT shall
respond quickly to individual project
requests. The time required to complete
the proj ect shall. be proj ected in the
proposal for that proj ect submitted by
the CONSULTANT. Following the acceptance
of a research design, the CONSULTANT
shall agree to meet with personnel of the
FDOT Environmental Office on an "as
needed" basis to ensure the successful
completion of work on the project.
E. Proiect Desian Analvsis
1. Corridor Analvsis
A comparison of viable corridors shall be made with
respect to social and environmental impacts, right-of-way
and construction costs, and satisfying the travel demand
in the project area. The Department and City consider the
A-24
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
only feasible corridor to be confined within the Drew
Street alignment.
2. Conceptual Desian Analvsis
After selection of the viable corridor(s), the CONSULTANT
shall establish design traffic and design speed, prepare
Conceptual Plans, and develop and analyze design
alternatives for the Project. All data gathered thus far
shall be used in the development of these alternatives.
The objective is to develop viable alternatives based on
standard engineering practice which provide appropriate
highway daily Level of Service D (Year 2015 Peak Hour) or
higher commensurate with the social, economic and
environmental impacts involved. If such a design is
determined by the CONSULTANT to be non-feasible, he shall
recommend to the CITY and DEPARTMENT the most feasible
design concept which will maximize the capacity of the
proposed facility. The design of the proposed improvement
shall be established and developed in conceptual form but
in sufficient detail to permit definitive analysis.
The analysis of the alternatives shall identify the non-
viable alternates and provide documentation for rejection.
The more viable alternative(s) shall be further evaluated
to a point where conceptual design plans can be developed.
a. Establish Desian Traffic Volumes
This task consists of developing the traffic
proj ections to be used in establishing the basic
requirements for the proposed facility or
improvements.
The CITY shall request Pinellas County MPO to run the
FSUTMS models for the following design alternatives
for the year 2010.
1. No build - No improvements on Drew Street
2. Build - With improvements on Drew Street (4 LD)
3. Build - With improvements on Drew Street (6 LD)
The request shall include that MPO also repeat
alternative number 3 (above) for the year 1995.
The CITY shall ask Pinellas County MPO to provide to
the consultant the traffic volumes for each of the
above mentioned design alternatives.
A-25
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
The CONSULTANT shall determine the model based growth
rate by iterpolating the 1995 and 2010 traffic volume
data for alternative number 3 (above).
The CONSULTANT shall also determine a historical
growth for Drew Street. The consultant shall then,
under review and approval of the CITY, select and
recommended growth rate for Drew Street. The
CONSULTANT shall use this growth to extrapolate and to
compute the design system year 2015 traffic volumes
for each of the design alternatives.
(1) The CONSULTANT shall develop daily demand project
traffic based upon the methodology discussed above
in schematic form with K, D, and T factors for the
existing year, opening year and 2015.
The CONSULTANT shall present Design Hour Volume
(DHV) and Average Daily Traffic (ADT) in schematic
form for the project.
(2) The CONSULTANT shall not develop design alternates
or perform analysis depending on traffic inputs;
e.g., noise impacts, air quality assessment, until
the Technical Memorandum is approved by the CITY
and the DEPARTMENT.
b. Traffic Analvsis
The following tasks will be completed as part of the
Traffic Analysis:
(1) A Level of Service Analysis of Drew Street based
on the existing traffic conditions will be
conducted.
(2) The design year 2015 traffic volumes will be used
to code PASSER II-87 runs for the alternatives
described in item (a) above.
(3) By using optimization runs of the PASSER I I -87
model and by providing intersection improvements
where deemed necessary, efforts will be made to
minimize system delay, system number of stops, and
the system fuel consumption.
(4) The results of the analysis will be reported by
tabulating the PASSER II-87 outputs for each of
the above mentioned alternatives and by evaluating
the traffic operations related parameters provided
by PASSER II-87 model.
A-26
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(5) A Level of Service Analysis of the feasible
al ternatives will be provided for the traffic
conditions in the design year 2015.
c. Traffic Technical Memorandum
A Traffic Technical Memorandum shall be prepared by
the Consultant for the purpose of documenting the
methodology used in developing demand traffic peak
hour design volumes and the results of this study.
This technical memorandum, or traffic report, shall be
conveyed to the Department and the City and shall also
serve as the instrument for the Department's and the
City's approval of project traffic. It shall also be
shown in the preliminary engineering report.
d. Develop Desian Alternatives
This task consists of identifying, developing, and
analyzing feasible design alternatives for subsequent
evaluation of viability. This shall include adequate
consideration of non-motorized modes of
transportation.
The studies shall determine the horizontal and
vertical alignment, typical cross-section, preliminary
right-of-way costs, preliminary drainage to the extent
of identifying required outfalls, traffic data,
geometric concepts of intersection/interchanges listed
under the Traffic Data Collection section of this
Exhibit, existing and proposed utility location to the
extent they effect the decision process, soils
information, extent of improvement to all intersecting
roads, acreage involved, prel iminary structure
concepts and locations, locations of retention basins
and/or impoundments as may be required, locations of
noise barriers, and such other design features as may
be pertinent to the analysis of the environmental and
engineering impacts. Major elements involved in this
task are:
(1)
Tvpical Section
The range of alternatives to be evaluated
for this proj ect will be determined by
the proj ect Development and Environmental
Study.
A-27
(09-30-91 ).
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
With consideration of business and
residential development, drainage
requirements and environmental impacts,
establish the type of design (urban vs.
rural) for the proposed improvement.
(2) Alianrnent
The CONSULTANT shall establish alignment
alternatives in conjunction with typical
section refinement to identify design
alternatives. The specific location of
the improvement shall be developed and
evaluated with respect to right-of-way
impacts and construction costs. Special
effort shall be taken to avoid conflicts
with areas containing hazardous
materials.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare the design
al ternatives on 1" = 100' scale aerial
mapping as necessary to develop
preliminary estimates of right-of-way
costs, construction costs and relocation
impacts and determine those alternatives
which can be eliminated as non-viable.
The rema~n~ng alternatives will be
retained for further development and
detailed evaluation. For some alignment
and typical section combinations, only a
brief evaluation may be all that is
necessary to rej ect them from further
consideration. However, the actual data,
and rationale used, shall be documented
by the CONSULTANT.
Before preparing these prints, the
CONSULTANT, CITY and the DEPARTMENT shall
jointly decide which alternatives shall
be evaluated for right-of-way, business
and relocation costs. The analyses
involved with these alternatives are
discussed in detail under the Comparative
Analysis of Feasible Design Alternatives
section of this Exhibit.
A-28
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(3) Hvdraulic Analvsis (Location Hydraulic
Report)
The Location Hydraulic Report (LHR) shall
be in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 24
of the PD&E Guidel ines Manual and as
outlined below:
a. Areas of potential flooding and
floodplain encroachment shall be
identified and equivalent hydraulic
requirements provided for cross
culverts.
b. Quantify encroachments based upon
available existing information.
c.
Evaluate overtopping
watershed crossings
Creek) using existing
flows.
of primary
(Stevenson's
flood study
The LHR does not include:
a. Watershed modeling for the Stevenson
Creek crossing.
b. Modeling of existing storm sewer
systems for Drew Street or adjoining
sidestreets.
c. Scour computations at Bridge
crossings or outfall locations.
d. Development of a Bridge Hydraulics
Report or Bridge Hydraulics
Recommendation Sheet.
e. Hydraulic Evaluation of more than one
preferred alignment.
f. Modeling of downstream conditions for
tailwater determinations.
(4) Conceptual Pond Location Report
Prepare a conceptual Pond Location Report
for one chosen typical section and
alignment. The required services include
the establishment of locations for
outfalls and conceptual pond sizing to
accommodate stormwater treatment and
attenuation which may comply with rules
of the DEPARTMENT of Environmental
Regulation and the Southwest Florida
A-29
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
Water Management District and FDOT Rule
14.86. The CONSULTANT shall supply
report to support the conceptual pond
sizing. The data and report shall be
prepared in accordance with the
DEPARTMENT's Drainaae Manual.
The pond sizing shall be based on 25-year
24-hour storm analysis for determining
attenuation requirements.
The conceptual pond location report shall
not include:
a. Sizing and location for proposed
stormsewer systems.
b. Proposed inlet locations.
c. Proposed inlet details.
d. Estimates of Probable Construction
Cost.
e. Detailed Evaluation of
Highwater Conditions.
Seasonal
f. Determination of Potential
Alternative Drainage Designs.
g. Preparation of fullsize (24"x36" or
larger) conceptual plans.
The CONSULTANT shall also research the
requirements/regulations of local
governments and incorporate those
requirements/regulations into the
conceptual pond sizing, or present
reasons as to why the local government
restrictions are not reasonable to be
applied to the CITY's and the
DEPARTMENT's proposed improvements.
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate the
concept with FDER and Southwest Florida
Water Management District concerning
stormwater treatment and surface water
management as required by Chapter 17-25,
Reaulation of Stormwater Discharae,
Florida Administrative Code; Chapter 40D-
A-30
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
4 and 40D-40, Rules of the Southwest
Florida Water Manaaement Districtj and
FDOT Rule 14.86. The CONSULTANT shall
notify the CITY and the DEPARTMENT in
adequate time to schedule a
representative to attend all related
conferences.
(5) Soils
The CONSULTANT shall provide to the CITY
a written geo-technical report based on
review of existing information, field
reconnaissance and a minimum of field
borings, if necessary, to identify soils-
related problem areas.
Report shall include anticipated soil
conditions along roadway and/or at
structure sites and recommendations for
treatment of problems that will hinder or
preclude design and/or construction.
No geotechnical field testing will be
performed, following the Notice-to-
Proceed, without specific written
authorization from the CITY.
(6) Structures
The CONSULTANT shall evaluate all bridge
structure needs. The evaluation shall
include widenings of existing structures
and/or replacement, and each of the
following to the extent necessary to
identify the viable alternative(s):
List the alternative structural design
concepts (e.g., moveable vs. fixed)
considered and the basis for elimination
of any as not being feasible or cost
effective. The concepts recommended
shall as a minimum include:
o
o
o
o
Horizontal Plan View
Vertical Elevation View
Bridge Typical Section
Bridge Overall Length
Suitability
structures
of widening existing
(Information available from
A-31
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
~
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
the DEPARTMENT'S
Office) .
Bridge
Inspection
(7) Prepare Desian Alternatives
The CONSULTANT shall plot each design
alternative on aerial mapping in
sufficient detail to permit evaluation of
costs and associated impacts. These
preliminary maps will include as a
minimum centerline alignment, existing
and proposed right-of-way lines, property
lines, street names, subdivision names
and boundaries, horizontal and vertical
alignment, and typical cross section.
3. Comparative Analvsis of Feasible Desian Alternatives
a. Comparative Analvsis
After developing the feasible design alternatives,
each alternate's costs shall be determined,
associated impacts identified and analyzed, and
compared to the other feasible alternates to
select the most viable. The types of items to be
evaluated include the following:
(1) Construction costs Develop the
construction cost estimate. Include cost
for engineering supervision.
(2) Right-of-Way, business damages and
relocation costs - Estimated right-of-
way, business damages and relocation
costs will be prepared to include land,
severance, court awards, settlements, and
data relative to business damages. These
estimates will be summarizeded by the
CONSULTANT, with input from the
DEPARTMENT for the viable alternative (s) .
(3) Preliminary engineering costs - Estimated
cost to prepare construction plans.
(4) Relocation Plan - The DEPARTMENT shall
prepare a Conceptual Stage Relocation
Plan in accordance with the Riaht-of-Wav
Procedures Manual Procedure RAl-4, Policv
Reference 4.102.
A-32
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(5) Bicycle Facilities - In accordance with
Part 2, Chapter 14, of the PD&E
Guidelines Manual.
(6) Economic Evaluation Prepare
benefit/cost analysis as necessary.
(7)
Drainage Features
drainage features and
for obtaining permits
alternative.
Identify maj or
the requirements,
inherent in each
(8) Environmental impacts - Analyze impacts,
such as air, noise, hazardous materials,
wetlands and floodplain encroachment,
4(f) involvement.
(9) Maintenance of Traffic - Identify methods
of maintenance of traffic during
construction and evaluate their cost.
(10) Traffic impacts determine levels of
service for each alternative.
b. Consideration and Resolution of Enaineerina Items
The CONSULTANT will comply with the FDOT letter to
Mr. J.R. Skinner, FHWA from Mr. J.C. Kraft, FDOT
dated June 1, 1987. The letter details the
thirteen bas ic engineering items to be covered
concerning the proposed improvement.
These thirteen basic engineering items will be
discussed with CITY, FDOT and FHWA staff and a
decision reached regarding the disposition of each
item prior to submitting the environmental
document with support documentation in the Draft
Engineering Report. The items are as follows:
(1) Alternatives to be considered (Location
and Design)
(2) Al ternatives found feasible (Location and
Design)
(3) Typical sections for each alternate
( 4) General horizontal and vertical al ignment
(5) Preliminary right-of-way and construction
cost estimates
(6) Major drainage, including outfalls
(7) Bridge location and type
(8) Proposed interchange layout
A-33
(09-30-91 )-
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Major intersection design concepts
Major utility adjustment
Maintenance of traffic concepts
Right-of-way requirements
Bicycle accommodations
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a minutes of meeting
which will serve as the 13-point document.
c. Selection of Alternatives
Following the performance of the comparative
analysis of design alternatives, the CONSULTANT,
the CITY, DEPARTMENT, and FHWA will select the
viable alternative(s) to be evaluated. The
information amassed thus far will be the basis
upon which the decisions are made. The
possibility exists that the No-Build alternate may
be selected at this point.
d. Conceptual Desian Plans
After the viable alternatives are selected the
CONSULTANT shall prepare Conceptual Design Plans
of the selected alternates in reproducible form on
Conceptual Base Plans. Prints of the Conceptual
Design Plans shall be prepared for use in review
and public involvement meetings. An example set
can be provided by the DEPARTMENT.
e. Identifv Construction Searnents
The CONSULTANT shall determine feasible segments
for construction projects within the project
corridor in consideration of budget, priority
needs, maintenance of traffic, and the public
demand for the improvement.
f. Value Enaineerina Multi-discipline Team Review
The project development and conceptual design
performed under this contract will be subject to
Value Engineering. The following activities are
anticipated:
( 1 ) The CONSULTANT project manager may be
required to meet with the District Value
Engineering (V. E.) team to discuss the
project and answer questions the team may
A-34
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
have. This V.E. effort may require two
meetings.
(2) Provide information or analysis for the
DEPARTMENT's V. E . Team as requested by
the DEPARTMENT.
Three sets of full size Conceptual Design
Plans and three Draft Engineering reports
shall be provided to the Value
Engineering Team.
g. Proiect Team Review
The CONSULTANT shall attend a review meeting held
by the CITY and DEPARTMENT.
The purpose of the review is to assure that the
Draft Environmental Document (Cat. Ex.) is
complete and ready for submission to the FHWA.
The environmental Sub-contractor (s), if any, shall
participate in this review. The sufficiency of
the work accomplished will be determined at this
time.
F. Preliminarv Enaineerina Report
1. First Draft Enaineerina Report
The information amassed thus far shall be submitted in
a First Draft Engineering Report.
This is to be a technical report developed using the
scientific method which shows why and how the various
alternatives (build and no-build) were developed, as
outl ined in Part 1, Chapter 9 of the DEPARTMENT'S
Proiect Development and Environmental Guidelines
Manual.
The engineering report shall be prepared addressing
all viable project alternatives both graphically and
verbally. A comparative evaluation shall also be
included addressing alternative horizontal and
vertical alignment, typical cross-section, preliminary
right-of-way costs, preliminary drainage to the extent
of identifying outfalls, traffic data, geometrics,
maintenance of traffic, schematic sketches of
intersections/interchanges, preliminary utility
information, extent of improvement to all intersecting
A-35
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
J
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
roads, acreage involved, preliminary structure
concepts (length and width only) and locations, the
location of retention basins and/or impoundments as
may be required, the location of noise barriers, and
such other design features as may be pertinent to the
analysis of the environmental and engineering impacts.
All this information is shown on uncontrolled aerial
survey.
The report shall be prepared on 8-1/2 inch by 11 inch
paper. The use of charts, sketches, diagrams, tables,
etc., is encouraged to reduce the narrative that would
otherwise be required. A highly legible reduced copy
of the conceptual plans of the most viable alternative
shall also be included on 11 inch by 17 inch paper.
The format for the written Engineering Report is:
a. Description, purpose and need for the study.
b. Description of existing facilities.
c. Methodology of the study.
d. Formulation of Alternatives.
e. Analysis of Alternatives.
f. Selection of Viable Alternatives.
g. Summary of Recommendations.
h. Appendices:
(1) Field Data
(2) Data Analysis
(3) Supporting Studies (geotech, traffic,
etc. )
(4) Conceptual Plans (including structural)
One review and response cycle by the Department and
the Consultant will occur for the First Draft
Preliminary Engineering Report prior to the
Alternatives Public meeting.
A-36
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
2. Submit Second Draft Preliminarv Enaineerina Report
The first draft Preliminary Engineering Report shall
be updated to reflect all changes resulting from the
public meeting and from the Value Engineering review.
Ten (10) copies of the second draft shall be submitted
for one review and comment cycle by the Department and
the Consultant concurrently with the Draft
Environmental Document (Cat. Ex.).
3. Final Preliminarv Enaineerina Report
Following the Public Hearing and allowing sufficient
time for all comments to be reviewed, the CONSULTANT
shall recommend a LocationjDesign alternative to the
CITY and DEPARTMENT.
Once approved by the CITY and the DEPARTMENT after
consultation with FHWA, the CONSULTANT shall prepare
the Final Preliminary Engineering Report. These
documents shall:
a. Address the engineering issues raised at the
hearing and effect disposition of same. This
action is an important part of the study process
and shall involve appropriate staff personnel
studying suggestions received as a result of the
meeting. This shall be done in coordination with
the CITY and DEPARTMENT.
b. Revise Second Draft Preliminary Engineering Report
to discuss the selected alternative, agency and
Public Hearing comments. Add in the Final Report
a Commitment and Recommendation Section.
c. List engineering related public hearing comments
and responses to same.
d.
Revise Comments
reflect public
received.
and Coordination Sections to
hearing and general comments
e. Submit twenty-five (25) copies of Final
Preliminary Engineering Report to the CITY.
The Final Preliminary Engineering Report is submitted
to the CITY with the Final Environmental Document
(Cat. Ex.). A maximum of two (2) review and response
cycles by the Department, FHWA and the Consultant will
occur prior to the LocationjDesign acceptance.
A-37
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
1
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
G. Environmental Documents
1. Preparation of Air and Noise Impact Reports
The CONSULTANT will provide the necessary data to
develop the Air and Noise impact reports only for the
viable alternative(s) that will be presented at the
Public Hearing. Separate reports shall be prepared by
the CONSULTANT.
2. Submit Wetlands Evaluation Report
In order to obtain meaningful comments from permit and
permit review agencies, a Wetlands Evaluation Report
shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT early in the
process. Upon CITY and DEPARTMENT approval, the
CONSULTANT shall distribute the report.
The report shall:
a. Evaluate impacts of the project upon permittable
areas. Cons ider such things as el imination of
habitat, changes in flow, erosion and
sedimentation, destruction of vegetation, etc.
b. Develop proposed mitigation measures, such as
modifying slopes, bridging, reducing median
widths, creation of wetlands and treatment of
runoff. Specifically address FAC, Chapter 17-25.
c. Compile and print Wetlands Evaluation Report to be
provided to permit and permit review agencies for
early coordination and jurisdictional
determinations. The Wetlands Evaluation Report
shall contain, at a minimum, the following:
(1) Location map indicating project termini
and each potential permit site.
(2) Description of exist.ing and proposed
facility.
(3) General description of project area.
(4) Site Specific information as outlined in
Part 1, Chapter 10 of the P.D.&E.
Guidelines.
(5) Photograph(s) of each site.
(6) Completed Waterway Investigation Sheets.
A-38
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
(7) Request for comments.
(8) Offer of a joint field review upon
request.
(9) Conceptual stormwater management scheme.
(10) All information contained in the wetlands
section, including dredge and fill
quantities, total wetland acreages,
function and importance, proposed
mitigation, etc.
3. Prepare Environmental Data Report
An Environmental Data Report shall be prepared
addressing topical environmental issues and areas not
contained in separate technical reports. This Report
will serve as documentation of the environmental study
process and conclusions to support the summaries that
will subsequently be included in the Environmental
Determination Form 508-01 (Categorical Exclusion) in
compliance with the PD&E Guidelines Manual.
4. Environmental Determination
The Consultant shall conduct the necessary analysis
and prepare the Environmental Determination Form 508-
01 (Categorical Exclusion) in compliance with the PD&E
Guidelines Manual. The CE shall address the pertinent
impact areas, as outlined in the Manual, to the level
of detail warranted. Supporting technical reports
shall be summarized in the CE under corresponding
headings.
H. Public Meetinas
Gaining public support for the proposed facility is of
primary importance in the development of the alternatives
for the project. To assure that the public is aware of
the project objectives, a continuous public involvement
program shall be provided by the CONSULTANT for the
duration of the study, this program shall include the
following:
1. Public Involvement
The CONSULTANT shall prepare for review by the CITY
and DEPARTMENT a continuous Public Involvement
A-39
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
Program. Possible items to be included in the program
are:
o
Formal news releases.
o
Informal "town-meetings" on routine basis.
o
Schematic displays at public
accessible to pedestrians.
sites
easily
o
Presentations to interested civic groups.
Upon the CITY's approval of the Public Involvement
Program, the CONSULTANT shall implement the program.
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the scheduling
of meetings and the preparation or updating of all
displays for the program. At the discretion of the
CITY, the CONSULTANT shall conduct or assist in the
presentations to the communities.
a. Mailina List Preparation
(1) The CONSULTANT shall identify and compile
a mailing list of any affected, possibly
affected, and interested parties early in
the study process. This includes the
identification (from county tax rolls) of
all persons owing property within 300
feet either side of the centerline of all
viable alternatives pursuant to the
provisions of Florida Statute 339.155.
(2) Elected and appointed officials in the
area (city, state, federal, county) and
community leaders shall be identified and
placed on the mailing list of officials
and interested parties.
(3) Possible permit and review agencies shall
be identified and placed on the mailing
list of officials and interested parties.
(4)
The mailing list of
interested parties shall
person or institution
interest in the project.
officials and
also include any
expressing an
(5) Media in the project area shall be
identified and placed on a mailing list
A-40
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
to be used for news release/distribution,
advertisements or any other concerns.
b. Identifv and Inspect Public Meetina Sites
Prospective sites for any meetings to be held
shall be inspected for suitability by the
CONSULTANT.
Consideration shall be given to location, seating
capacity, sound system, lighting, display space
and any other physical characteristic which would
influence the viability of this site. The
CONSULTANT shall obtain the meeting site.
(1) Possible Public Involvement Meeting sites
(which may also be the Public Hearing
site) shall be cataloged.
(2 ) Sites which have characteristics more
suitable to a public hearing (than a more
informal information meeting) shall be
cataloged.
All costs associated with the obtaining of the
meeting sites shall be the responsibility of the
CONSULTANT.
c. Collect Public Input
This activity occurs throughout the life of the
proj ect and requires maintenance of files,
newspaper clippings, letters and especially direct
contact before, during and after any of the public
meetings in the Project Development phase.
(1) Input is gathered during the Public
Involvement Meeting, either by personal
contact or by formal testimony and by
letter, visit or phone call in response
to said meeting.
(2) Input is also gathered by personal
contact during the Public Hearing or
during the formal public testimony time
frame of the hearing. This formal input
is documented in the transcript of public
hearing proceedings.
A-41
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
2. Alternatives Public Meetina
The purpose of the Alternatives Public Meeting is to
present to the public the results of the study to date
and obtain comments on the alternatives. It is
possible that additional alternatives may be suggested
by citizen involvement.
This meeting shall be advertised and conducted by the
CONSULTANT as an informational meeting. The
CONSULTANT shall conduct the meeting and prepare all
necessary displays, maps, script, slides, etc.
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all required
postage costs. One (1) meeting is anticipated to
publicly present the viable design alternatives for
this project. The CONSULTANT's responsibilities for
the meeting are as follows:
a. All presentations (script and graphics), media
releases, legal and display advertisements, and
general (mass) property owner letters shall be
prepared by the CONSULTANT and reviewed and
authorized by the CITY.
b. Displays advertisements A black-and-white,
quarter-page display announcing any meeting shall
be prepared by the CONSULTANT and submitted to the
CITY for approval. This advertisement shall be
pub 1 ished by the CONSULTANT in the area
newspaper (s) having the largest daily circulation.
All media costs for media and display
advertisements shall be the responsibility of the
CONSULTANT.
c. The CONSULTANT shall notify elected and appointed
officials and other interested persons by letter
a minimum of 15 days before the meeting.
d. Property Owner Letters - A letter announcing the
workshop meeting shall be written and sent by the
CONSULTANT ten days before the meeting to all
property owners whose property lies in whole or in
part within 300 feet of the centerline of any
alternate.
e. News releases shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT
and submitted to the CITY for approval.
Publication during the week of the workshop and
A-42
(09-30-91 ).
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
kickoff meetings shall be performed by the
CONSULTANT.
f. A memorandum about the meeting with location map
shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and sent to
the CITY's and DEPARTMENT's Project Manager for
submission to the Office of Environment, Legal and
Public Information Office.
g. The meeting format shall be developed by the
CONSULTANT and submitted to the CITY for review.
h. The CONSULTANT shall prepare displays or wall
graphics for use during the meeting. These shall
include typical sections, aerial photographs,
renderings, charts, and graphs, as needed.
1. The CONSULTANT shall prepare camera-ready graphics
to be used with a formal presentation if this
technique is used.
j . A briefing of CONSULTANT, CITY and DEPARTMENT
personnel (who will be on hand during the meeting)
shall be performed by the CONSULTANT just before
the meeting to make sure the staff is up to date
on the proj ect and understands the study well
enough to discuss it with the public and to answer
questions.
k. Meeting equipment setup and tear down shall be
handled by the CONSULTANT's staff members familiar
with audiovisual equipment and the facilities
available at the meeting site.
1. Conducting the meeting will take knowledgeable
CONSULTANT staff and shall require enough members
to handle the crowd anticipated for the meeting.
Although the meeting may be scheduled for a
certain time period, the CONSULTANT's staff shall
be available for some time before and/or after
those set hours in order to maintain public
contact or for media interviews, etc.
m. The identification of issues brought up at the
meeting is an integral part of the meeting
debriefing process, which shall be attended by all
staff members taking part in the meeting process
and talking with the public.
A-43
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
n. Once issues have been identified from the meeting,
their significance shall be determined by the
CONSULTANTj i.e., are the issues valid enough for
further consideration or do they have elements
which may require further consideration.
o. Addressing the issues and responding to them is
also an integral part of the meeting process which
shall be performed by the CONSULTANT. This task
involves letter writing, the placement of an ad,
distribution of news releases, or any other
appropriate techniques.
3. Coordination Meetinas with Local Officials
These meetings shall be held just prior to the Public
Hearing to apprise local officials-of the proj ect
status, specific location and design concepts, and
receive their comments.
It is specifically required that the document shall
show evidence of coordination with the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) including support and
concerns of the MPO regarding the proj ect. This
coordination is accomplished by presentations to the
MPO's Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and to the
MPO prior to the public hearing. Presentation
materials for the TAC Meetings shall include copies of
aerial photography depicting the design concept(s).
Presentation materials for the MPO Meetings may
include both aerial photography, 35 mm slides, and
posters.
4. Comments and Coordination Report
a. Document the public participation accomplished
throughout the study period.
b. Summarize and respond to the. comments received
from the public involvement, advanced notification
and permit coordination efforts as per Part 2,
Chapter 31 of the PD&E Guidelines Manual.
5. Public Hearina
In accordance with Part 1, Chapter 8 of the PD&E
Guidel ines Manual and Section H. 2. a - 0 of this
scope.
A-44
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
6. LocationlDesian Acceptance and Public Notice
a. The Draft Environmental Determination form (508-
01) shall be submitted to FHWA and the Bureau of
Environment for review and comment prior to the
Alternatives Public Meeting. Once all comments
have been satisfied, the FHWA approves the Final
Environmental Determination and grants proj ect
LocationjDesign acceptance.
b. A determination approval notification shall be
prepared by the CONSULTANT after the FHWA approves
the final document.
A quarter-page display advertisement in the
newspaper shall be used and the notice published
by the CONSULTANT. DEPARTMENT review prior to
publication is required.
VI. STUDY REOUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK
A. Governina Reaulations
The services performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in
compliance with all applicable State and Federal
regulations. Included among these regulations are:
1. U.S.C.: Title 23: Highways
2. 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c), popularly known as Section
102(2) (c) of the National Environmental Policv Act of
1969, P.L. 91-190.
3. 42 U.S.C. 1653 (f), popularly known as Section 4(f) of
the DEPARTMENT of Transportation Act of 1966, P.L. 89-
670.
4. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (P.L.
89-665) and Executive Order No. 11593 ("Protection and
Enhancement of the Cul tural Environment") as
implemented in "Procedures for the Protection of
Historic and Cultural Properties", 36 C. F . R.; Part
800.
5. The "Endangered Species Act of 1973 (amended 1978)",
16 U.s.C., (P.L. 93-205).
6. Executive Order No. 11990, "Protection of Wetlands".
A-45
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
i
I
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
7. Executive Order No. 11988, "Floodplain Management".
8. Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes.
9. FDOT PD&E Guidelines Manual.
10. 23 CFR 771.
11. 23 CFR 770.
12. All of the appropriate Federal-Aid Highway Program
Manual FHPM) issuances and related FDOT Policies and
Directives governing the implementation of the
previously mentioned regulations.
The standards referred to and recommended in the
American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and FDOT's Design
Criteria related to highway safety shall be used to
extent applicable. The horizontal vertical alignments
developed by the CONSULTANT shall be the best
engineering solution to a given problem and not merely
an adherence to the minimum AASHTO standards.
13. Manual of Uniform Standards for Desian, Construction,
and Maintenance for Streets and Hiahwavs.
14. Bicvcle Facilities Plannina and Desian Manual, Rev.
Ed. 1982.
15. Hiahwav Capacity Manual, Special Report 209.
16. Chapter 337.241 Florida Statutes..
B. Proiect Schedule
Within ten (10) days after the Notice to Proceed meeting
the CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY a schedule for the
completion of the study. The schedule shall be prepare by
using the Critical Path Method (CPM) and shall include the
establishment of milestone dates for the major work items.
The schedule shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT for
approval prior to the CONSULTANT beginning work and shall
be accompanied with an anticipated payout and physical
progress curve. Periodically, throughout the life of the
proj ect, the schedule and curves shall be reviewed and
adjusted as necessary to incorporate changes in the work
concept and progress to date.
A-46
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
~
i
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
C. Kev Personnel
The CONSULTANT's work shall be performed and directed by
the key personnel identified in the proposal presentations
by the CONSULTANT. Any changes in the indicated personnel
shall be subject to review and approval by the CITY.
D. Proaress Reportina
The CONSULTANT shall meet with the CITY and DEPARTMENT on
a monthly basis and provide written progress reports
monthly which describe in detail the work performed on
each task. Progress reports shall be delivered prior to
the submittal of the invoice. Approval of the progress
report is needed before the monthly invoices can be sent.
Judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and
quantity has been accomplished will be made by the CITY's
Project Manager by comparing the reported percent complete
against actual work accomplished.
E. Unscheduled Meetinas and Presentations
The CONSULTANT and his staff shall be available with no
more than a five (5) weekday notice to attend meetings or
make presentations at the request of the DEPARTMENT. Such
meetings and presentations may be held at any hour between
8:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight on any day of the week. The
CONSULTANT may be called upon to provide maps, press
releases, advertisements, audiovisual displays and similar
material for such meetings. No more than eight (8) such
meetings are anticipated.
F. Correspondence
Copies of all written correspondence between the
CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this
study shall be provided to the CITY for their records
within one (1) week of the receipt or mail ing of said
correspondence.
G. Liaison Office
The CITY and DEPARTMENT will designate a Liaison Office
and a Project Manager who shall be the representative of
the CITY and DEPARTMENT for the Proj ect. While it is
expected, the CONSULTANT shall seek and receive advice
from various State, regional, and local agencies, the
final direction on all matters of this Project remain with
Project Manager.
A-47
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
J
WPA NO. : 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
VII. SUBMITTALS
A. The CONSULTANT shall furnish copies of the below listed
documents containing sufficient detail regarding corridor
location, conceptual design considerations and copies of
various plans, exhibits, etc., as follows:
Sheet
Document Ouantitv Size (inches)
Advance Notification Package 30 8 1/2 x 11
Hazardous Materials Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Traffic Technical Memorandum 10 8 1/2 x 11
Location Hydraulic Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Conceptual Pond Location Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Conceptual Design Plans 20 22 x 36
13 Point Summary Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
First Draft Engineering Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Second Draft Engineering Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Final Engineering Report 25 8 1/2 x 11
Wetlands Evaluation Report 20 8 1/2 x 11
Draft Environmental Data Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Final Environmental Data Report 10 8 1/2 x 11
Draft Environmental Determination
Form (508-01) 10 8 1/2 x 11
Final Environmental Determination
Form (508-01) 10 8 1/2 x 11
B. Upon completion of the study, the CONSULTANT shall
deliver, in an organized manner, all project files, maps,
sketches, worksheets, and other materials used or
generated during the study process to a site designated by
the CITY.
C. Upon approval of the Environmental and Engineering
Documents by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall sign and seal
the front cover of a Final Environmental Document and
submit the sealed document to the CITY. The Final
Engineering Report will be signed and sealed by a
Registered Professional Engineer of the CONSULTANT and
submitted to the CITY.
VIII. OPTIONAL SERVICES
After the recommended alternative has been determined and
subsequent to the public hearing, the CITY may, at its option,
negotiate with the CONSULTANT for the following Optional
Services. Upon satisfactory completion of the negotiations,
a supplemental agreement may be executed with the CONSULTANT.
A-48
(09-30-91 )-
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
In the event that an agreement cannot be reached between the
CITY and the CONSULTANT, the CITY reserves the right to acquire
professional engineering services in accordance with Section
287.055 Florida Statutes and DEPARTMENT Procedures. (Refer to
Exhibit "B", Optional Services, for compensation provisions)
These optional services are as follows:
A. CONSULTANT Services for final design, including
preparation of Baseline Control, RjW Survey, Right-of-Way
Maps and Design Surveys.
B. In the event of an unavoidable involvement with those
lands defined in Section 4 (f) of the DEPARTMENT of
Transportation Act of 1966, preparation of the required 4
(f) statement and associated documentation.
The fee for the services shall be negotiated in accordance with
the terms detailed in Exhibit B, Method of Compensation, at a
compensation the CITY determines is fair, competitive and
reasonable considering the scope and complexity of the
project(s). A supplemental agreement adding the additional
services shall be executed in accordance with the
aforementioned CONSULTANT Agreement.
IX. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY
The CITY with the assistance of the DEPARTMENT will provide
those services and materials as set forth below:
A. Review and Approval of Advance Notification Package.
B. Project data currently on file.
C. Engineering standards and review services.
D. Environmental standards and review services.
E. All available information in the possession of the CITY
and the DEPARTMENT pertaining to utility companies whose
facilities may be affected by the proposed construction.
F. All future information which may come to the CITY and the
DEPARTMENT during the term of the CONSULTANT's Agreement
and which, in the opinion of the CITY and the DEPARTMENT,
is necessary to the prosecution of the work.
G. All available information in the possession of the CITY
and the DEPARTMENT pertaining to subdivision plans so that
A-49
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
WPA NO.: 7117121
STATE PROJECT NO.: 15050-1501
the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that
can be utilized as part of the existing right-of-way.
H. Coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer
regarding the results of historic and archaeological
survey.
I. Environmental analysis reports processing including
Wetlands Evaluation Reports.
J. The DEPARTMENT will permit the CONSULTANT to utilize the
DEPARTMENT's computer facilities upon proper authorization
as described in the DEPARTMENT Procedure No. 261-009.
The models anticipated for use in this project are AARPJ12
and AARPJ13.
K. Existing right-of-way maps for State Highways.
L. Available accident data.
M. Coastal Zone Consistency determination.
N. Permit coordination report review and approval.
O. Pre-numbered survey books in which to record field data.
P. Standard Department discs for monuments for the benchline.
Q. Approval of all contacts with environmental agencies.
R. Stormwater Coordination Processing.
S. Farmlands Coordination Processing.
T. Utility Assessment Package.
X. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE DEPARTMENT
The DEPARTMENT will provide those services as set forth below:
a. Right-of-way cost estimates.
b. Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan (CSRP).
XI. BEGINNING AND LENGTH OF SERVICES
The PD&E services described herein shall commence upon written
notice by the City of Clearwater and shall be completed within
20 months from such notification.
A-50
(09-30-91)
Revised 11/11/91
I
I
BXHIBIT B
COKPBNSATIOII
POR
CONSULTIIIG ENGINEERING SERVICBS
DREW STRBBT
PROM PORT HARRISON AVBNUB TO NORTHEAST COACBHAN ROAD
CITY OP CLEARWATBR
J
I
EXHIBIT B
COMPENSATION
FOR
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
DREW STREET
FROM FORT HARRISON AVENUE TO NORTHEAST COACHMAN ROAD
CITY OF CLEARWATER
I. METHOD OF COMPENSATION
A. Time Charges. The CITY agrees to compensate the ENGINEER
for the professional services called for under EXHIBIT A
to this Agreement by the hours worked and the attached
fee schedule.
Estimated costs for each of the work items follow in
section IV. While the cost for some work items may
actually be less or greater than the estimate, the upset
limit total including reimbursable costs shown for the
entire work effort may not be exceeded.
B. Additional Services - Services authorized by the CITY
other than those specifically listed in the Scope of
Services shall be considered additional services for
which the CITY shall compensate the ENGINEER as provided
for herein. Additional services shall include revisions
to work previously performed that are required, because
of a change in the data or criteria furnished to the
ENGINEER, or a change in the scope of concept of the
project initiated by the CITY, and/or services that are
required by changes in the requirements of public
agencies, after work under this Agreement has commenced.
C. Direct/Reimbursable Expenses - The CITY shall reimburse
the ENGINEER for all out-of-pocket expenses directly
chargeable to the services provided at the actual cost
incurred. Such charges shall be itemized and included in
the monthly invoices and shall be submitted and paid as
provided for such invoices. Typical reimbursable
expenses include long distance phone charges, meals and
travel expenses when traveling on the CITY · S behalf
outside of the Tampa Bay area, computer time charges, and
identifiable reproduction costs.
B-1
Drew Street
MISCl-63
I
I
II. INVOICING PROCEDURE
A.
III.
A.
Drew street
MISCl-63
The ENGINEER shall submit invoices to the CITY for work
accomplished during each calendar month; the amount of
each monthly invoice shall be based on time charges/out-
of-pocket expenses for the work accomplished during the
invoicing period. The ENGINEER is employing professional
subcontractors on this proj ect. The CITY shall reimburse
the ENGINEER for the cost of these subcontracts. Such
invoices shall be submitted by the ENGINEER as soon as
possible after the end of the month in which the work was
accomplished and shall be due and payable by the CITY
within thirty (30) days.
MISCELLANEOUS
B.
Fee Renegotiation - The ENGINEER'S fee presented in this
proposal is based on a continuity of those development
stages presented. Design or construction phasing shall
cause the fees presented herein to be subject to
renegotiation. If the ENGINEER'S design or construction
services continue beyond October 1, 1994, the fees
contained in section IV and V of this Exhibit shall be
subject to renegotiation; any change in such fees shall
apply only to the unfinished service as of the effective
date of such change.
Regulatory Constraints - The CITY understands and agrees
that should the CITY direct the ENGINEER to perform a
portion of the work prior to recei ving the necessary
approval from the applicable regulatory agency, and
regulatory agency approvals, when granted, require
changes to said work, such changes shall be considered as
"Additional Services" and the ENGINEER will be
compensated for the "Additional Services" in accordance
with Paragraph I.B. above.
C.
Rules, Regulations, Ordinances - The CITY understands and
agrees that the work outlined in Section V of Exhibit A,
Basic Services, and the fees outlined in Section IV of
Exhibi t B, Compensation, are based on the ENGINEER'S
performing the services in accordance with the existing
B-2
I
I
local, County, state, and Federal rules, regulations and
ordinances in effect at the time of execution of this
Agreement, and should any changes to such rules,
regulations and ordinances be made, the ENGINEER will be
compensated for any "Additional Services" necessitated by
such changes in accordance with Paragraph I.B. above.
IV. For the services described elsewhere herein, the maximum
limiting compensation is established at $496.429.89. This is
based on the following:
Labor Services (PBS&J):
Direct/Reimbursable Expenses (PBS&J):
$333,465.00
32,944.80
Subconsultants (Includes Direct Expenses):
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
78,202.81
Archaeological Consultants, Inc.
9,876.35
Florida Transportation Engineering
Scheda Ecological Associates
11,456.93
4,364.00
Cline/Contec South
26.120.00
$496,429.89
Total Maximum Limiting Compensation:
The basis of these estimates is included in the following pages.
B-3
REV. 11-11-91
DREW STREET
MISCl-63
I
I
~ANHOUR TABULATION SHEET
PA6E 1 OF :'
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST. BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNI6AN, INC.
DATE: NOVEKBER 11. 1991
STATE PROJECT NO. 15050-1501
WPA NO. 7117121
FAP NO. K-1464(9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EKPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
I I
1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVITY
:PROJECT :PROJECT I SENIOR
:DIRECTOR:KANA6ER PROF.
:DESI6N.!: TECH.!
PROF. CADD: DRAFT. :ENVIRON.:PLANNER :CLERICAL: TOTAL
I I I I I I I I I I ! r
,----------------------------------------------,--------1--------,--------1--------1--------,--------,--------,--------1--------,--------1
I
I
:A. PROJECT INITIATION I 10 : 24 : 26 : 28 : 4 12 20 8 : 10 142
-------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;
I
I
1. NOTICE TO PROCEED KEETIN6 : 4 : 4 : 8 8 0 0 I 4 4 2 I 34 I
-----------------------------------------:--------~--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
I
2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN 2 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 : 0 : 12
J 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I i
----------------------------------------- --------1--------1--------,--------,--------.--------.--------1--------,--------,--------1
3. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION PACKA6E
o
8
a
a
o
4 I
8
o
4
40 I
_________________________________________1________,________'________1________1________,________,________1________,________I________!
lIt I I I I I 1 I I
: 4. INTRODUCTORY OR KICKOFF KEETIN6 4 : a : 8 8 4 8 8 4 4 56
1______________________________________________1________'________1________'________1________1________,________,________'________,________,
I It' i I I I i It;
I
I
:B. SURVEYS
o
12
a
20
o
o
o
o
6
46 I
-------------------------------------------:--------:--------:-------_!_-------:--------:--------:--______I-_______:________:________:
I
I
1. FIELD SURVEYS 0 4 4 : 8 : 0 : 0 0 : (J 2 18
_________________________________________1________,________1________1________1________1________1________,________1________1________,
I I I I 1 I I r 4 ;
I
I
2. AERIAL SURVEY 0 : 8 I 4 12 0 (I : 0 0 I 4 28
:----------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:-------_!_-------:--------:
:C. ENGINEERIN6 DATA COLLECTION 0 24 24 48 24 : 40 (I (l : 20: 180:
-------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;--------:--------:--------:
I
I
1. EXISTING HI6HWAY CHARACTERISTICS
o
16
24
40
24
40
o
o
16
160
_________________________________________!________I________1________1________,________1________1________,________,________1________,
1 I I I ; i . , ; I ;
2. TRAFFIC
o
4
o
4
o
o
o
o
2
10
1 I I I 1 I I I j I 1
-----------------------------------------1--------1--------1--------.--------1--------1--------,--------,--------4--------1--------,
I
I
3. ACCIDENT
o
4
o
4
o
o
(I
Q
2
10
,______________________________________________1________1________1________,________1________1________,________1________,________1________,
t I 4 ; i I I ; l , I I
:D. ENVIRONKENTAL DATA COLLECTION
47 :
___________________________________________1________1________1________1________,________,________,________,________,________,________1
1 I I I I , I I I i r
I I
I I
: 0 :
o
3b
102
200
22
86
~., I
Ji. ,
50
595
1. SOCIAL AND ECONOKIC IKPACTS
4
2
4
2
2
32
- 24
2
72
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
I
2. NATURAL AND PHYSICAL IKPACTS : 0 : 2 : 0 : 2 : 1 : 1 : 16 : 16 : 2 : 40 I
_________________________________________1________1________1________1________1________.________,________,________1________,________,
I I i I I I I , I t I
I
I
~ANHOUR TABULATION SHEET
PAGE 2 OF 5
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST. BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN. INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1991
STATE PROJECT NO. 15050-1501
WPA NO. 7117121
FAP NO. M-1464(9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
1______-----------------------------------------------____________________________________1
I '
ACTIVITY
:PROJECT :PROJECT
:DIRECTOR:MANAGER
SENIOR
PROF.
PROF.
:DESIGN./: TECH./
CADD DRAFT. :ENVIRON.:PLANNER :CLERICAL: TOTAL
I
I
:----------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
3. UTILITIES , 0 4 : 12 : 24 : 8 : 8 0 0 4 60
_________________________________________1________1________J________I________I________!________I________I________1________1________1
I , 1 i I I 4 I ; '
4. TRANSPORTATION PLANS I 0 : 2 : 2 : 4 : 2 0 4 16
_________________________________________,________,________,________1________,________'________1________,________1________1________1
I ; 1 I 4 l I I f
5. PERMIT COORDINATION
o
4
16
24
o
4
8 I
o I
2
58
_________________________________________1________,________1________,________1________1________1________1________1________1________1
I i I I I i I I , I I
I I I
, I I
6. BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT : 0 : 4 2 I 4 : 0 4 : 24 0 : 2 : 40 I
-----------------------------------------:--------;--------:--------:--------;--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------'
I
,
7. RELOCATION IMPACT
o
4
8
8
2
2
6
B I
.,
L
40
_________________________________________1________,________I________'________i________l________,________l________1________1________,
1 I i I I ! I r I , I
I
,
8. NOISE IMPACT : 0 : 2 : 0 : 0 I 0 0 0 4
_________________________________________:________:________:________:________:________:________:________:___-----:--------:--______1
,
I
9. AIR QUALITY IMPACT : 0 2 : 0 0 0 0 0 1 : 4 :
_________________________________________,________1________,________1________1________,________1________,________,________1________1
I I , 1 4 1 I I 4
10. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (I I 4 60 I 126 8 : 24 0 0 32 254
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------~--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
I
11. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT: 0 , 4 : 0 2 0 0 0 (I : 7 :
:----------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
:E. PROJECT DESIGN ANALYSIS
I
,
___________________________________________;________:________:________:________:________:________:________l________:________:________1
26
17b
412
672
216
346
30
30
64
1972
1. CORRIDOR ANALYSIS (BASE MAPS & EVAL.) : 4 16 : 24 : 24 16 : 16 4 4 4 I 112:
_________________________________________:________:___-----'--------:--______1______--:--------:--------:---_____:________:________'
2. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ANALYSIS
I
, , ,
I I , I , 1 , 1 I 1 I
-----------------------------------------,--------,--------4--------1--------,--------,--------,--------1--------1--------1--------.
I
,
a. ESTABLISH DESIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2 4 : 77: 112 0 0 0 (I 6 201
_________________________________________1________'________I________,________I________i________I________'________1________,________,
I I , I I I I I I I I
I
I
b. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 2 : 4 33, 128: 0 : (I (I 0 (I 167
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------'--------'--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I 1 1 1 1 I
4 , . I ~
c. TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
2
4
46
34
8
60
(I
(I
24
178
, , 1 I ill I , I I
-----------------------------------------,--------1--------1--------1--------,--------;--------.--------1--------,--------1--------,
I
I
MANHOUR TABULATION SHEET
PAGE 3 OF 5
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST. BUCKLEY. SCHUH & JERNIGAN. INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 11. 1991
STATE PROJECT NO. 15050-1501
WPA NO. 7117121
FAP NO. M-1464i9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
I I
1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------;
ACTIVITY
:PROJECT :PROJECT
:DIRECTOR:MANAGER
SENIOR I
PROF. PROF.
:DESIGN./: TECH./ I
CADD : DRAFT. :ENVIRON.:PLANNER :CLERICAL: TOTAL
,______________________________________________1________,________1________1________'________1________1________1________1________,________,
I ; . ill I ( I I f I
I
I
I
I I , I t I
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
d. DEVELOP DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
(1) TYPICAL SECTION : 2 : 12 : 8 24 : 16 I 24 (I 0 (I 86
-----------------------------------------:._-------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------~
(2) All GNMENT : 2 : 16 : 32 : 40 : 32 : 60 I (I (I (I 182 I
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------;--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
,
(3) HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS (LHR) I 0 2 : 32 : 32 0 8 : (I (I 6 80 I
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
I
(4) CONCEPTUAL POND LOCATION REPORT : (I : 2 : 20 : 30 : (I : 8 0 0 : 0 60
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
,
( 5) SO I LS I (I I 4 2 4 : 0 0 0 0 : (I 1 (I I
_________________________________________'________,________1________'________1________1________,________1________1________,________1
, fl. j I ; I f I 1
J , ' I
I I f I
(6) STRUCTURES I (I : 4 : 12 : 48 : 0 24 (I : (I : 2 : 90
-----------------------------------______1________1__-_____1________1________1________1________1________,________,________l________'
I I t I I I I I r t
(7) PREPARE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
2
16
12
24 I
40
40
o
o I
o
134
! I I J ! I I I I ! I
----------------------------------------- --------1--------,--------(--------,--------,--------,--------1--------1--------.--------,
~. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEASIBLE
DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------;--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
a. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 2 : 32 : 50 80 : 24 : 24 12 12 I 4 240
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;--------:
b. CONSIDERATION AND RESOLUTION OF
ENGINEERING ITEMS
2
16
16
16
2
4
2
2
4
b4
_________________________________________:________:________'________:________:________;________:________:___-----:--______1______--:
c. SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES : 2 8 : 12 16 I 2 I 2 2 2 : 2 48
-----------------------------------------~--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;--------:--------:
I I
, I
d. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLANS (I 16 : 16 : 40 : 64 64: 4 4 : 8 216
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------'--------:
e. IDENTIFY CONSTRUCTION SEGMENTS/MOT 0 4 4 : 4 : 8 I 8 (I 0 (I 28
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
I
4 :
_________________________________________1________1________,________1________1________1________1________1________,________1________,
I 1 I I I t i I I I t
f. VALUE EN6INEERING TEAl'! REVIEW
'1
L
8
8
8
4
4
4
.,
i.
44
I
I
MANHOUR TABULATION SHEET
PAGE 4 OF 5
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST. BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 11. 1991
STATE PROJECT NO. 15050-1501
WPA NO. 7117121
FAP NO. M-1464(9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
ACTIVITY
:PROJECT :PROJECT
:DIRECTOR:MANAGER
SENIOR
PROF.
:DESIGN.!: TECH.!
CADD : DRAFT. :ENVIRON.:PLANNER :CLERICAL: TOTAL
PROF. :
,______________________________________________1________,________1________1________1________'________1________1________,________1________1
I I f I l , , f I I I i
8 :
I J I Ii! I I I I I !
t----------------------------------------------,--------I--------,--------,--------I--------j--------I--------;--------,--------I--------!
g. PROJECT TEAM REVIEW
2
8
8
o
o
2
2
"
i.
32
: F. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT : 10 68 112 148 : 34 : 38 : 26 20 44 500
-------------------------------------------:--------'--------:--------:--------:--------:--------~--------:--------:--------:--------:
1. FIRST DRAFT ENGINEERING REPORT
4
40
72
84
24
24
16
12
24
300
J I I I 1 I I ! 1 I ,
-----------------------------------------,--------,--------(--------1--------,--------1--------,--------,--------,--------1--------,
2. SECOND DRAFT ENGINEERING REPORT
2
12
16
24
4
6
4
4
8
80 '
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------~--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I I " I I
f I I 1 I f
3. FINAL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT: 4 : 16 : 24 : 40 : 6 : 8 : 6 : 4 12: 120:
1______________________________________________1________,________1________,________,________,________,________1________1________1________1
t I i I I 1 I f I I I 1
I
,
:G. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS 4 : 16 48 : 52 : 12 : 24: 104: 36 , 32 328
___________________________________________'________1________,________1________1________1________1________1________1________1________1
I I I If' f I 1 { I
I
,
1. PREPARE AIR AND NOISE IMPACT REPORTS 0 4 0 : 4 : 0 0 0 0 0 8
_________________________________________1________'________I________'________I________I________I________l________,________1________1
, I I' I' r I I ,
2. WETLAND EVALUATION REPORT
o
4
24
32
4
4
4
o
8
80
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
,
3. PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT 2 4 16 8 b 16 60 32 16 160 :
_________________________________________1________1________'________'________,________,________,________,________,________1________1
I I I I I I I I I I f
, 4. PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: 2 4 : 8 8 I L 4 40 I 4 B 80 '
:------------------~---------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------~--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I
,
:H. PUBLIC MEETINGS : 48 136 : 98: 151: 40 : 42 : 42 34 : 35 626
-------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
1. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
a. HAILING LIST PREPARATION : 0 : 2 : 0 2 : 0 0 0 0 (I , 4
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;
I I
,
b. IDENTIFYIINSPECT PUBLIC MTG. SITES 0 : 4 : 0 4 0 0 0 ' (I : 0 8
-----------------------------------------:--------~--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
I I
I ,
c. COLLECT PUBLIC INPUT (INVOLVEHENT) : B 60 : 40 60 : 0 : I) : 8 : B : 16: 200:
_________________________________________1________1________1________1________1________1________1________1________1________1________,
I ~ I , I I I I I I I
I
I
"ANHOUR TABULATION SHEET
PAGE 5 OF 5
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST~ BUCKLEY~ SCHUH & JERNIGAN. INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1991
STATE PROJECT NO. 15050-1501
WPA NO. 7117121
FAP NO. M-1464(9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:
ACTIVITY
:PROJECT :PROJECT
:DIRECTOR:MANA6ER
SENIOR
PROF.
:DESIGN./: TECH./
CADD : DRAFT. :ENVIRON.:PLANNER :CLERICAL: TOTAL
PROF. :
1______________________________________________1________1________,________1________1________1________1________,________1________1________1
I 1 { I . I r I ; I ( ;
I
I
2. ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC "EETING : 6 : 12 : 16 : 24 : 16 16 12 : B 4 114
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--~-----:--------:--------:
,). COORDINATION MTG. WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS: 24 40 24 32 : 8 10 8 8 8 162 I
-----------------------------------______1______--:---_____:________:________:________:________:________:___-----:--------:--------:
4. COMI'IENTS AND COORDINATION REPORT 2 4 2 4 0 0 2 : 2 : 2 18
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
5. PUBLIC HEARING 8 12 16 24 : 16 16 12 8 4 116 I
-----------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:
: 6. LOCATION/DESIGN ACCEPT & PUBLIC NOTICE: 0 : 2 : 0 : 0 0 0 0 1 4
:----------------------------------------------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------:--------;--------:--------:--------:--------:
:VI. STUDY REQUIREMENTS & PROVISIONS FOR WORK
36 :
144 :
16 :
104 :
o :
8 :
12 :
4 :
38 :
362 :
1 I I I I I I I i I I
---------'----------------------------------{--------i--------1--------1--------.--------.--------,-------- --------l--------l--------l
I I
I I
D. PROGRESS REPORTING (20 "ONTH SCHEDULE): 20: 120: 8 : 80 : 0 : 0 : 8 : 0 : 30: 266:
_________________________________________1________,________1________1________1________1________1________1________,________,________,
I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I
I I
I ,
E. UNSCHEDULED "TGS. & PRESENTATIONS (8) 16 24 8 24 0 8 : 4 4 8 96
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LABOR SERVICES
SUBTOTAL MANHOURS BY CLASSIFICATION
134
636
846
1423
352
557
320
184
299
4751
1______________________________________________1________1________1________1________1________1________1________,________i________I________1
I I 1 . I I I I I I I t
I I
I I
10! CONTINGENCY 13 : 64 : 85: 142: 35 : 56 : 32 18 30 475
I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I
,----------------------------------------------j--------.--------;--------,--------1--------1--------,--------!--------;--------I--------I
I
I
LABOR SERVICES
TOTAL I'IANHOURS BY CLASSIFICATION
147
700
931
1565
387
613
352
202
329
5226
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
DREW STREET PD&E STUDY LABOR COSTS
POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
FISCAL YEAR (OCT. 1 TO SEPT. 30)
---------------------------------------------
1991-92 1992-93 TOTAL
EMPLOYEE --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
CLASSIFICATION HOURS S HOURS S HOURS S
------------------ -------..-..-- ------------ ---.....-------
PROJECT DIRECTOR 79 S9,875.00 68 S9,010.00 147 S18,885.00
PROJECT MANAGER 432 S38, 880. 00 268 S25,594.00 700 S64,474.00
SENIOR PROF. 642 S53,928.00 289 S25,793.25 931 S79,n1.25
PROFESSIONAL 1067 S57,084.50 498 S28,261.50 1565 $85,346.00
DESIGNER/CADD 249 S12,450.00 138 S7,314.00 387 S19,764.00
TECH./DRAFT . 401 S13,233.00 212 S7,420.OO 613 S20,653.00
ENVIRON. SCIEN. 227 S13,506.50 125 S7,875.00 352 $21,381.50
PLANNER 130 S8,287.50 n 14,878.00 202 S13,165.50
CLERICAL 212 16,360.00 117 S3,714.75 329 $10,074.75
------------ ------.----- ------------
TOTALS 3439 S213,604.50 1787 S119,86O.50 5226 $333,465.00
Note: The Fiscal Year represented here corresponds to the City of Clearwater
Fiscal Year (October 1 to September 30).
I
I
~ST!MATE OF DIRECT/REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (Page 1 OF 2)
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST, BUCKLEY. SCHUH & JERNI6AN. INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 11. 1991
MATERIAL (Mylar)
68 sht x
$6.00 =
$408.00 (TOTAL)
REPRODUCTION (Sepias, Blueline, Xerox)
: Sepia Blueline Xerox
I I I I I
,--------------------------------------------1-----------,---------------,--------------1
:Advance Notification Package
750 :
:Hazardous Materials Report
I I I
, , I
I I l J J
1--------------------------------------------,-----------,---------------;--------------,
1,000 :
:Traffic Technical Memorandum
1,500 :
-------------------------------------------- ----------- ---------------:--------------
:Location Hydraulic Report
500 :
I I I
, I ,
t I I J I
,--------------------------------------------,-----------,---------------j--------------,
:Conceptual Pond Location Report
300 :
:Corridor Base Maps
I
,
I I I I J
,--------------------------------------------,-----------,---------------,--------------,
1" I
J. I
120 :
:Base Conceptual Plans : 36 : 720 : :
,--------------------------------------______1______--___'_______________1______________,
I I I 1 I
:Conceptual Design Plans
72:
1,440 :
:13 Points Summary Report
,--------------------------------------______1______--___1_______________1______________1
I I I I I
I I
, ,
300 :
:First Draft Engineering Report
2,000 :
:Second Draft Engineering Report
2,500 :
I I I I I
1--------------------------------------------.-----------,---------------,--------------,
:Final Engineering Report
7,500 :
I
-------------------------------------------- ----------- ---------------,--------------
:Wetlands Evaluation Report
600 :
:Draft Environmental Data Report
I I I
I I I
1 I I I I
1--------------------------------------------,-----------1---------------.--------------1
1. 000 :
:Final Environmental Data Report
1,500 :
:Draft Environmental Determination (Cat. Ex.):
300 :
:--------------------------------------------:-----------:---------------:--------------:
:Final Environmental Determination (Cat. Ex.):
300 :
:--------------------------------------------:-----------:---------------:--------------:
:Project Miscellaneous
32 :
2,000 :
3.500 :
, I I f I
,--------------------------------------------,-----------1---------------,--------------,
: TOTAL SHEETS
152 :
4,280 :
23.550 :
I
,
f I I I I
,--------------------------------------------1-----------1---------------,--------------.
REPRODUCTION COSTS:
Mylar Sepia = 152 sheets @ S7 . 90 / sheet = $1,200.80
Blueline = 4,280 sheets @ SO.51 / sheet = $2,182.80
Xerox = 23,550 sheets @ $0.10 / sheet = $2,355.00
TOTAL EXPENSES (Page 1 of 2) =
$6,146.60
I
~STI~ATE OF DIRECT/REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (Page 2 OF 2)
PROJECT: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
PREPARED BY: POST. BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1991
TRAVEL
To/from PBS&J Tallahassee office:
(Per Diem) 2 trips x
(COlli) 2 trips x
(Rentall 2 trips x
1 person x
1 person x
1 daysltrip x
To/from PBS&J Miami office:
(Per Diem) 2 trios x
(Com) 2 trips x
(Motel) 2 trios x
(Rental) 2 trips x
1 person x
1 person x
1 person x
1 days/trip x
POSTAGE
1000 pieces @ SO.29
COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN/DRAFTING
CADD - 250 hours @
Microcomo - 400 hours @
I
1 day/trip x
S326.00 per/trip =
S40.00 daily rate =
S9.00 per diem =
2 day /trio x
S120.00 per/trip =
S50.00 per night =
S40.00 daily rate =
S18.00 per diem =
$35.00 per hour = S8.750.00
S15.00 per hour = S6,OOO.00
TELEPHONE & SHIPPING
20 months @ S50.00 per month
OTHER
Presentation Boards
PMT's
Film Purchase & Processing
25 pieces @
48 pieces @
20 rolls @
Database Service for Environ. Records
Color Copies for Haz. Mat.
Misc. Tools for Haz. Mat. (Gloves, Sample Jars, ect.)
Aerial Photography (AeA, Inc.)
S45.00 per piece = Sl,125.00
$15.00 per piece = S720.00
S16.06 per roll = S321.20
= Sl,100.00
= $150.00
= SlOO.OO
= S6,OOO.00
TOTAL EXPENSES (Page 1 of 2)
TOTAL EXPENSES (Page 2 of 21
TOTAL EXPENSES
$18.00
S652.00
$80.00
$72.00
$240.00
$100.00
$80.00
TOTAL = $1.242.00
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
= $290.00
= $14,750.00
= $1,000.00
TOTAL = $9,516.20
= $6,146.60
= $26,798.20
------------
= $32,944.80
I
I
v. PBS&J FEE SCHEDULE
Rate ($/Hour)
FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94
Job Classification
Principal/ $125.00 $132.50 $140.50
Project Director
Project Manager 90.00 95.50 101.25
Sr. Professional 84.00 89.25 94.50
Planner 63.75 67.75 71.75
Environmental Scientist 59.50 63.00 66.75
Professional 53.50 56.75 60.00
Sr. Designer 50.00 53.00 56.25
Technician/Drafter 33.00 35.00 37.25
Clerical 30.00 31. 75 33.75
Survev FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94
Survey Manager $85.00 90.25 $ 95.50
Surveyor 52.00 55.25 58.50
Field Supervisor 46.75 49.50 52.50
3 Man Crew 85.50 90.75 96.25
Clerical 30.00 31.75 33.75
NOTE:
The Fiscal Year (FY) represented here corresponds to the
City of Clearwater fiscal year (October 1 to September
30) .
~
L-iA
I TRANSPORTATION SOLUJONS, INC. _, .
j
Mr. Dan Kelly
Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
5300 West Cypress Street
Suite 300
Tampa, FL 33607-1066
rocn3-~': 199\
P B S J, , N C.
- TAMPA
I
\
\ ----
October 29, 1991
;,..., ...:z _' ".~'
~~+~~-_.
Reference: Revised Labor Costs
Drew street PD&E study
FILE
-.a, ..OJ_'J! I .....,,-
Dear Dan:
As per your request, we have adjusted our labor hours to reflect
the changes in scope-of-work. The revised total labor costs for
air quality, noise, and our portion of the public invol vement
amounts to $67,511.33 which is a reduction of $4,782.30 from the
previous labor amount. This total, combined with the out-of-
pocket expenses, revises the total contract amount for TSI to
&78,202.81.
Enclosed are spread sheets documenting the revised labor hours and
costs.
If you have any questions on the enclosed, please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
Richard D. Alberts, P.E.
Principal
RDA:ar
Enclosures
Rocky Point Island Reserve · 2709 Rocky Point Drive
Suite 202 · The Loft · Tampa, FL 33607 · 813-289-3332
=====================================Ir=======================================1t=================================
: : EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION- : : : :
Dre" Street PD&E Manhours
Transportation Solutions, Inc. Only
Revised October 29, 1991
TASK
.-----------------------------------------------------------
Al NOTICE TO PROCEED MEETING
~
SR PLNR : DR.H /TECfl: E!,;"VIRON
o :
P~1
: PL.....NNER
:CLERICAl ..
;---------------------------------------;---------:---------:---------:
o :
. .
---------.---------.---------
o ..
o :
o :
1"01.H
flOL'R~
! .,
. .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
.. ..
: A2 PUBLIC INVOlVE~E~T PLAN
o :
---------------------------------------'---------'---------.---------'
. . . .
'---------'
. .
: A~ INTRODUCTORY/KICK OFF ~EETINGS
20 :
: D,) :-;oISE LIP.\CT D.\TA
~
:---------------------------------------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------;---------;
: D9 AIR Q~ALITY IMPACT DATA
4 :
------._-------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------:--------- ---------:---------. .---------
GS :
: G1 PREPARE AIR & NOISE IMPACT REPORTS :
12 :
16 :
S :
16 :
16 :
17 .
o :
o :
o :
-l
20 ::
. .
--------- --------- --------- ---------
. . . .
28 ::
o :
o :
o :
. .
---------,---------.---------. .
o ..
16 :
16 :
12 :
52 :
28 :
20 ;
o :
o :
o :
12 ::
9" .
6S :
: fl1a MAILING LIST PREPARATION
o ;
---_._----------------------------------:---------:--------- ---------:--------- ---------:--------- ---------
SO ::
o :
o :
16 :
~o :
21
: H1b IDENTIFY & INSPECT MEETING SITES
o :
. ..
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. ...,
o ..
S :
o :
o :
o :
. .
---------------------------------------,---------.--------- --------- ---------.---------.---------,.
: HIe COLLECT PUBLIC INPUT
32 :
. . .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. . .
32 :
: HZ ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC HEETING
32 :
--------------------------------------- ---------.--------- ---------:--------- ---------:---------. .---------
125 ::
: H3 COORDINATION tlEETINGS LOCAL OFFICIA:
32 :
~ "; :
32 :
32 :
o :
100 :
16 ;
; fl1 COMMENTS & COORDIN~TIOS REPORT
~
---------------------------------------.---------'---------.---------.
, , . .
~
16 :
~o :
~o :
32 ::
._--------'---------
. . .,
10 ::
24 :
32 ;
21 :
o
~
.---------.---------
. .
8 :
~ :
. . ,. ..,
.---------------------------------------.---------.---------.--------- ---------.---------.---------.
: H5 PUBLIC HEARING
37 .
---------------------------------------,---------,
. .
: H6 lOCATION/DESIGS ACCEPTAKCE NOTICE
o :
~o :
S :
92:
2-1 :
37 .
12
o :
.---------.--------- ---------
. .
o ..
o :
o :
,I) :;
192 :;
235 ::
'10 ::
232 ::
,') ::
o :
---------------------------------------:---------;---------:---------;---------:---------:--------- ---------
o ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
. . , , , . .
,---------------------------------------,---------.---------.---------,---------.---------.---------
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
o ;
:---------------------------------------;---------:--------- ---------:---------;---------;--------- ---------
o ;
o :
o :
o :
o :
IJ
. . , . .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----_.----
, . . , , ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
---------------------------------------;--------- ---------:---------:---------;---------;---------..
o ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o ..
. . .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
.' .., ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
. . .
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. . .
o ..
---------------------------------------.---------.
. .
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
, . "
,---------------------------------------.--------- --------- ---------.--------- ---------.---------.,
o ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
.. .,.
---------------------------------------.---------.--------- ---------.---------.---------.---------,.
o ::
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
. ..
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. .,
o ..
:---------------------------------------:---------;
o :
o :
o ;
o :
. ..
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. .. -.
---------------------------------------.---------.
. .
o :
o :
o ;
o :
o :
o ..
.. .
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
.. .
o ..
---------------------------------------.---------.
. .
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o ..
o ..
o ..
o ..
o ..
. . . , , .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. . . . , .
o ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
---------------------------------------.---------.---------.---------.---------.---------.---------. ,---------'.
---------------------------------------,---------.---------.---------,---------.---------.---------. .---------..
1206 :;
TOTAL
1i6 :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
252 :
256 :
240 :
li2 :
110 :
I
I
:========================================================================================================~=------
DREh STREET LABOR COSTS
NOVEMBER 1, 1991-SEPTEMBER 3D, 1992
P~I
REVISED OCTOBER 29,1991
: Sl07. 46 :
SPLS'
$60.16 :
DIT
$35.81 :
PLS'/ES'V :CLERICAL
S50.15 :
r 0 L\L
---------------------'
. .
S20.77
HOURS
FEE
: AIR At'D l'OISE
12 :
. .
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. .
1.36 : S7,O~2.9S
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
94
26 :
125 :
26 :
1?-
~ I
60 :
IS7
12 ::
54 ::
587 : $32, 6GS. 7-1
o :
. .. .. . .
,--------------------------------------- ---------.--------- --------- ---------,---------. .---------.-----------,
$0.00 :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
. . . . . . ., . ,
.---------------------------------------.---------.---------.---------.---------,---------, ,---------.-----------.
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
sO.OO :
;---------------------------------------:---------;---------:---------:---------:---------: ;---------:-----------,
SO.OO :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
. '"
,--------------------------------------- ---------.---------.--------- ---------.---------
so.OO
o :
o :
(j :
o :
o ..
o ;
. . . . .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
. . . . . ..
$0.00 :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o "
o :
---------------------------------------;--------- ---------:---------:--------- ---------. .--------- -----------
SO.OO :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
, . ..
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------.---------.---------..
SO.OO :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
. . , ..
--------------------------------------- --------- ---------.---------.---------.---------..
50.00 :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
. , . , ..
--------------------------------------- ---------.---------,---------.---------.---------..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 :
o :
---------------------------------------;---------;---------;---------:---------:--------- --------- -----------
$O.DO ;
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
---------------------------------------;--------- ---------:---------;--------- ---------..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
$0.00 :
o :
.---------'---------.--------- ---------
. . .
. . ---------.
.. .
--------------------------------------- ---------
. .
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 :
o :
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------:---------;---------
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 ;
o :
o :
---------------------------------------;---------:---------:---------;---------;---------
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
~O.OO :
---------------------------------------;---------;---------;---------:---------;---------; :---------:-----------;
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 :
o :
:=====================~=================:========~:=========:=========:====~====:=========: :=========;===========:
66 ::
723 :$39,711.72 :
: TOT.\L
106 :
:==========~=================================-========================~=================.=========================:
1:;1
153 :
247 :
* TOTAL LABOR FEE .
** OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES
$39,711.72
SO.OO
TOTAL FEE
S39,711.;2
I
I
DREw STREET LABOR COSTS
OCTOBER 1, 1992-~~Y 1,1993
PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-----------------------------,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----.
TOTAL
REVISED OCTOBER 29,1991
: 5112.83 :
SPLS
$63.17 :
D/T
PLN/ESV :CLERICAL ..
$37.60 :
$:>2.66 :
S21.~>l ::
HOURS
fEE
: AIR AND NOISE
8 :
. . . . .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
. . . . .
92 : $1,997.35 :
18 :
18 :
40 :
s ..
. . . . . . .. . .
,---------------------------------------.---------,---------.---------.---------.---------, ,---------.-----------.
: prBLIC INVOLVEMENT
62 :
53 :
85
125 :
36 ::
391 :S22.802.23 :
o :
.. ......
---------------------------------------.---------,--------- ---------.---------.---------. .---------,-----------,
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
SO.OO :
, . . . ,
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
. . . . , ..
o :
o :
o :
o :
o "
o :
sO.OO :
---------------------------------------:---------:--------- ---------:--------- ---------, ,--------- -----------
SO.OO :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o
o :
--------------------------------------- ---------:---------:--------- ---------:---------: :--------- -----------
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00
,---------.---------.---------'---------
, . , "
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
o :
SO.OO :
, " .
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
, ,. .
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 ;
. , . , ,
--------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
, , , . . ,.
$0.00 :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o .,
I) :
--------------------------------------- ---------;--------- --------- ---------:---------, .--------- -----------
o ..
o :
~O.OO :
o :
o :
o :
o :
;---------------------------------------:---------:---------;---------:---------;---------: :--------- -----------
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 :
--------------------------------------- --------- ---------:--------- ---------;---------, ,--------- -----------
o ..
o :
$0.00 :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
---------------------------------------;---------;--------- --------- ---------:---------: ;---------;-----------
o ;
o :
o :
o :
o ..
sO.OO :
o :
---------------------------------------:---------;---------;---------;---------;---------
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
$0.00 :
._--------'--------- ---------'--------- ---------
., .
o :
o :
o :
o ;
o ..
o :
$0.00 :
,---------'---------'---------'---------
. . . ,
o :
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
SO.OO :
o :
. , ' ,
---------------------------------------,---------.--------- --------- ---------.---------.,
o :
o :
o :
o :
o ..
SO.OO :
,----------------------------------------.---------"--.-------"---------.---------,---------. ,-------.--.-----------.
.---------------------------------------.---------.---------.---------,---------.---------. .---------,-----------.
TOTAL
70 :
.-----------------------------------------------------------.---- ------------ ---- - ------------
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
101
103 :
165
H
483 :S27,799.61
~ TOTAL LABOR fEE
~* OUT-Of-POCKET EXPE~SES
S27,799.G1
$:J.OO
TOTAL fEE
$27,799.61
l
I:
I"
1/
I
/
/'
I
I
DREW STREET
TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Out-of-Pocket Expenses
Xerox
Miscellaneous
10,000 copies x .10 per copy $ 1,000.00
(Letters, agendas, newspaper clippings,
advertisements, minutes of meetings, press
releases. Slide show text and distribution
and project documentation files)
Notification of Property Owner Letters
5000 @ .10/coPY
500.00
Four Newsletters
4 x 2 pages x 200 distribution x .10
160.00
Public Meeting/Hearing handouts
@ 2 pages ea x 250 copies x 2 meetings/
hearings x .10
100.00
Reports
Draft Comments and Coordination Report
300 pages x 5 copies x .10
150.00
Final Comments and Coordination Report
300 pages x 5 copies x .10
150.00
3 copies of hearing transcript letters
received, and publications etc. assume 300
sheets @ 3 copies each 900 sheets for
distribution
90.00
$ 2,150.00
Slide Shows
Initial show - computer generated slide processing
30 slides @ 20.00 per slide $
600.00
Second show - 15 additional slides
15 slides @ 20.00 per slide
300.00
Cost of Film (field slides)
Film Processing (field slides)
20.00
80.00
Slide show recording - 2 @ 500.00
1.000.00
$ 2,000.00
j
1/
I
I
Out-of-Pocket Expenses
Page Two
Mailings
Notification Letters
5000 @ .35/per mailout
Meeting Agendas/Minutes
100 at .35 per mailout
Newsletters
800 (4 x 200) at .35 per mailout
Miscellaneous Correspondence
600 @ .35 per mailout
Other
1/4 page advertisement in black and white
in local paper st. Petersburg Times -
Clearwater Edition (4 ads x 642.60)
Court Reporter (Public Hearing Only)
35.00/1st hour
25.00/each additional hour
2.90/page @ 200 pages
Clearwater Meeting/Hearing Location
Assume no charge
Tax Assessors Office Computer Time
St. Petersburg Times - Clearwater
Edition Subscription (2 years)
TOTAL OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS
I
$ 1,750.00
35.00
280.00
210.00
$ 2,275.00
$ 2,570.40
700.00
0.00
500.00
496.08
$ 4,266.48
REVISED SEPT. 30, 1991
$ 10.691.48
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED
POST OFFICE BOX 5103 / SARASOTA, FLORIDA 34277-5103 / TELEPHONE (813) 955-6876/ FAX (813) 365-7999
DREW STREET
CULTURAL RESOURCBS ASSESSIIElIT
SP NO. 150501-50, WPA NO. 711771-21
COST PROPOSAL
Bill Backgr. Field Lab Report Meetings/
Rate Res. Survey Writing Planning
Task Costs
Personnel
P.M. $45.00 0 0 0 8 16 $1,080.00
P.I. 40.00 8 0 0 24 0 1,280.00
Pro j . Arch 32.00 8 16 4 16 0 1,408.00
Sr. Hist. 32.00 40 24 0 80 4 4,736.00
Arch. Tech. 14.50 0 24 4 0 0 414.40
Crew 10.80 0 16 0 0 0 172.80
Crew 10.80 0 16 0 0 0 172.80
Clerical 10.80 0 0 0 40 0 432.00
Total Labor Cost: $9,696.00
Direct Expenses:
Film and Processing
I 50 buildings X 3 prints each
$5.00 per roll; $35.00 per roll
processing - 3 rolls needed
Leased vehicle; daily rate
$18.45 X 3 days (Archaeologists)
Mileage (Historians)
$.20 X 150
120.00
55.35
30.00
Report printing/binding
I 50 pages X 6 copies
Total Direct Expenses
75.00
$180.35
Total Projected Job Cost: $9,876.35
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED
POST OFFICE BOX 5103 / SARASOTA, FLORIDA 34277-5103 / TELEPHONE (813) 955-6876/ FAX (813) 365-7999
DRBW STREET
CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSIIBRT
SP NO. 150501-50: WPA NO. 711771-21
ESTIMATED WORK HOURS BY TASK AND PERSONNEL
Background
Research
Field
Survey
Lab
Person Task
Personnel
proj. Mgr. 0
P.I. 8
proj. Arch 8
Sr. Hist 40
Arch. Tech 0
Crew 0
Crew 0
Clerical 0
o
o
16
24
24
16
16
o
o
o
4
o
4
o
o
o
Total Task
Hours: 56
96
Report
Writing
Meetings/
planning
Total
Hours
8
24
16
80
o
o
o
40
16
o
o
4
o
o
.0
o
24
32
44
148
28
16
16
40
8
168
20
348
A review of the proposed Drew Street widening project revealed the
presence of 56 structures which would require preparation of Florida
Master site File forms. The location of these structures is as follows:
5 buildings in the 900 block, 8 in the 1000 block, 17 in the 1100 block, 7
in the 1200 block, 6 in the 1500 block, and 6 in the 1600 block of Drew
street: 7 more structures are located throughout the corridor. In
addition, one or two of the buildings may require the preparation of DOES.
Areas for archaeological subsurface testing are limited, but it is
anticipated that approximately 50 subsurface shovel test units can be
excavated.
I
I
SUBCONSULTANT: FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
PROJECf: DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
ACTIVITY: TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION (TASK V.C.2)
EMPWYEE TOTAL lABOR lABOR
CLASSIFICATION MANHOURS RATE FEE
PROJECf MANAGER 8 $88.92 $ 711.36
SENIOR ENGINEER 16 6736 1,077.76
SENIOR TECHNICIAN 68 49.85 3,389.80
TECHNICIAN 203 28.29 5,742.87
CLERICAL 16 18.89 302.24
TOTAL lABOR FEE $11,224.03
TOTAL DIRECf EXPENSES 232.90
TOTAL FEE $11,456.93
RE. 11-1-91
DREW-30AYD
I
I
HISCELLANEOUS & OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES
DREW STREET
STATE PROJECT NO.
W.P.I. NO F.A.P. No.
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
ROADWAY
RIGHT OF WAY MAPS
= SHEETS X $
= SHEETS X $
MATERIAL (MYLAR)
SHEETS X $
REPRODUCTION BLUELINE SEPIA XEROX
PHASE I (30%)
PHASE II (60%)
PHASE III (90%)
PHASE IV (100%)
BRIDGE PRELIMINARY
BRIDGE FINAL
MISCELLANEOUS 429
TOTAL SHEETS 429
COST PER SHEET $ $ $ 0.10
TOTALS $ $ $ 42.90
I $42.90
TRAVEL (FROM Punta Gerda, FL )
TO PROJECT:
(PER DIEM) trips X people X days/trip X $ per diem = $
(HOTEL) ----- trips X ----- rooms X ----- nights/trip X $----- per roam = $
(POV) 10 trips X --so miles X $ 0.20 per mile ----- = $ 100.00
(RENTAL) _ trips X L-- daysltrp X $ ~ daily rte + _____ mi. X $_ rte)= -
TO DISTRICT:
(PER DIEM) trips X people X $ days/trip X $_____ per diem = _
(COM) ----- trips X ~ people X $ ~ per trip =
(POV) trips X _____ miles X $ _____ per mile -
(RENTAL) _ trips XL-- days/trp X $ _____ daily rte + _____ mi. X $_ rte)-
TO TALLAHASSEE:
(PER DIEM) _____ trips X _____ people X $ _____ days/trip X $_____ per diem =
(COM) trips X _____ people X $ _____ per trip =
(POV) trips X _____ miles X $ _____ per mile =
(RENTAL) _ trips XL-- days/trp X $ _____ daily rte + _____ mi. X $_ rte)=
TRAVEL - I $ 100.001
/month
SHIPPING , TELEPHONE
3 months @ $ 30
I $ 90.001
TOTAL EXPENSES = S 232.90
I
I
SCHEDA
ECOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATES
E
rAU81t ~ ""
~ . 8 ~{---' N ~~
tAMPA
August 6, 1991
Mr. Dan Kelly
Post Buckley Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
5300 West Cypress Street, Suite 300
Tampa, Florida 33607
r-u u
FILE
Re: DREW STREET WIDENING
Fee Proposal
Dear Mr. Kelly:
In accordance with our recent telephone conversation, I am enclosing a fee computation for the
above referenced project. The hours required were estimated assuming that no WET II analysis
would be required. During a field review of the project, it was determined that there was
insufficient wetland involvement to warrant use of WET II. The total fee is based on the
standard fee schedule rate for Scheda Ecological Associates personnel and direct reimbursables.
Our current fee schedule is attached for your reference. If you have any questions, please
contact me at (813) 971-3755.
Sincerely,
Scheda Ecological Associates
~rn,~
Sandra M. Scheda, M.S.
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
4019 EAST FOWLER ,A.\'i,
TA1\1 PA, FLORID,'>" lie17
TEL: ~13!9/1.,,51
F.>..X, ~I ,;9,1.1~62
I
I
DREW STREET WIDENING
City of Clearwater, Florida
TOTAL CONTRACT FEE COMPUTATIONS FOR
SCHEnA ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
Labor
Senior Environmental Scientist
- 71 hours @ $6O.00/hour
$ 4,260.00
Direct Reimbursables
See attached detail sheet.
$ 104.00
1rotlll ~~..................................................................
$ 4,364.00
(09-30-91)
~
I
I
.....:l
-<:
E-
o
E-
II')
N
00
00
\0
N
v
....
t--
....
-0 Sl
.... <fl
o CI)
~ g
....
ll..
~ --
~ ; ....
:s .- CI)
.~ 4::
U ..a e
0 ~Cl
rJ'.J E-
rJ'.J
<
~
~ < -;
0 "'0 U
Z oC - C
~ CI) <fl
- 0 e .=
z ~ 0 = 5
u.l ~ o ._
Cl .... 0
- I-< 0 '> CI)
~ B =
E- ~ U u.l
u.l ~ ~
~ <
E- - &3 -;
CI) u c
~ ....... == e
0
~ U = -
>. rJ'.J o .~
..... .... -
Cl ..... .- = II') 00 00 \0 V ....
U ~ > CI) N N t--
= .-
~ u.l~
....
0
rJ'.J 02
~ CI)
CI)
Z
0 0
~ -
E-
-<: ....
CI)
U OIl
- <G
~ u.. ;
en ::E
CI)
-<: ~
.....:l
u '0'
p,:: ....
t:l.. C
0 <fl CI)
a:l ';;; ~ e ~
-<: >. .> ::l
.....:l -; CI) g
~ ~ Cl ::l
CI) e -;; 8
= .2: ~ = Cl
.g ........ u.l
] .- e E- -;;
-0 <G ~ ct:: =
"0 ~ S- e u.l
u OIl .0' Cl ct::
0 .... I e
<G .c~ U t:l.. e .....:l
BI ~ <G ll.. Cl <
Cl '-" <G OIl ~
N l'f'\ l'f'\ M vi 0
Cl Cl u.l t.ti 0 0 ~
I
I
MISCELLANEOUS AND OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES
DREW STREET WIDENING
City of Clearwater, Florida
SCHEDA ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
REPRODUCTION
Miscellaneous Xerox 200 sheets @ $O.lO/sheet
$ 20.00
Reference Mapping
$ 30.00
Film and Developing 3 rolls @ $18.00 each
$ 54.00
SUBTOTAL
$ 104.00
TOTAL EXPENSES
~ 104.00
~
~
t
Ie L I N E I
CONTEe SOUTH
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
157 STEVENS AVENUE · P.O. BOX 1689 · OLDSMAR, FL 34677
(813)855-6645 . (813)785-8834 . (813)855-6392 FAX
Revised:
September 27, 1991
August 7, 1991
Post, Buckley, Schuh, and Jernigan, Inc.
Attn: Dan Kelly
5300 West Cypress Street
Suite 300
Tampa, Florida 33607
Re: Drew Street PO & E 99-000.48
Dear Mr. Kelly:
In response to your letter of August 2, 1991, we are transmitting,
herewith, the requested scope of work and fee schedules for the Soils Report,
Hazardous Material Investigation, and Geotechnical Evaluation relative to the
above project. .
The scope of services for the various work efforts is as discussed with
you on August 6, 1991.
If you have any questions, or if we can be of help in any way 1n your
finalizing the PO & E agreement, please call.
We are looking forw1rd to working with your firm on this project.
Sincerely,
JI ED
LOOf a 1 f991
f.S 8 JI I N c.
tA~P
~. ~7
Rocco F. Capabianc~
President
-
RFC:jl
Enclosures
.L ---- ____
!
~LE
.n..._--:::'!o
SPECIALISTS IN CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY
I
I
CLINE/CONTEC SOUTH
Proposed Scope of Work
Geotechnical
Drew Street Widening
Clearwater, Florida
C1ine/Contec South will provide the geotechnical information for the Drew
Street Widening project.
and field reconnaissance.
Available information will be obtained by research
Test boring data previously performed will be
plotted and analyzed 1n respect to the widening project.
All data and
information pertinent to the project will be analyzed and submitted in an
engineering report. It 1S understood that both Drew Street and Cleveland
Street are within the scope of this study.
We anticipate obtaining information from existing plans, aerial photos,
and
boring data.
Pine11as County Soil Survey will be utilized where
appropriate.
Existing land use will also be investigated.
A field
reconnaissance will be made 1n conjunction with the soil conservation serV1ce
maps of the area. The areas will be identified as to the anticipated soil
conditions and any problem areas identified for further consideration. The
problem areas will be analyzed for possible types of remediation if necessary.
The report will be issued and detail the history and background of the
site study area, our findings, anticipated soil conditions, areas of concern,
and our recommendations. The report will include maps, photographs, logs of
available borings, and other pertinent graphics. Per Post, Buckley, Schuh,
and Jernigan1s instructions, no test borings will be performed during this
phase of the study.
~
~
t
I
I
Revised: Sept. 27, 1991
CLINE/CONTEC SOUTH
PROPOSED GEOTECHNICAL FEE SCHEDULE
FOR POST BUCKLEY SCHUH & JERIGAN
DREW STREET WIDENING
CLEARWATER FLORIDA
Personnel Existing Field Anaylsis Report Total
Data Reconn
Principal Engineer
at $90.00/Hr.
Project Manager 4 4 4 2 $1050.00
at $75.00/Hr.
Senior Engineer 8 8 8 8 2240.00
at $70,OO/Hr.
Staff Engineer 16 24 20 16 4560.00
at $60.00/Hr.
Senior Technician 12 8 900.00
at $45.00/Hr.
$8750.00
Clerical
240.00
Reproduction & Printing
(Provide ten (10) copies report)
100.00
Out of Pocket Expenses
Photos, etc.
250.00
Total $9340.00
Meetings: Requested personnel to be provided at above rates.
~
~
$
I
I
August 7, 1991
CLINE/CONTEC SOUTH
Proposed Scope of Work
Hazardous Materials Sites
Drew Street Widening
Clearwater, Florida
Cline/Contec SOuth will provide an on-site investigation at locations
designated by Post, Buckley, Schuh, and Jernigan as possible contaminated
sites. The sites will be checked by performing shallow augers and utilizing
an OVA meter on the soils to obtain readings of hydrocarbons. Samples of the
soils and ground water (if possible and necessary) will be taken to a chemical
laboratory for analysis.
Upon completion of the tests, an evaluation of each
site will be made and a report detailing our findings will be submitted.
The chemical test parameters will be selected on the basis of the initial
OVA readings, type of structure and business near each site and other possible
contaminant sources. Some parameters may vary due to the site conditions;
however, they will generally include volatile organic compounds and primary
inorganics on water samples and purgeable halocarbons or polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons on soils.
The report will delineate all sites selected, test locations, test
results, and an evaluation of the results 1n respect to problems with the
design. Both Drew and Cleveland Streets results are to be considered.
~
~
i
Principal Project Manager
at $75.00/Hr.
Geotechnical Engineer
at $70.00/Hr.
Geologist
at $60.00/Hr.
Field Technician
at $35.00/Hr.
Equipment at $200.00/Day
Chemical Tests
Soil at $175.00
Water at $500.00
Clerical at $30.00
Report Copies at $10.00
Out of Pocket
(Casing, Photos, etc.)
I
I
Revised: Sept. 27, 1991
FEE SCHEDULE
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SECTION
DREW STREET WIDENING
Field Test Report Total
3
1
300.00
4
8
840.00
48
8
3360.00
8
280.00
6
1200.00
10
10
1750.00
5000.00
150.00
100.00
5
10
200.00
13 , 180.00
~
!
I
I
August 7, 1991
Bridge Structures
Scope of Work
C1ine/Contec South will provide geotechnical explorations at selected
bridge structures involved in the study.
It is anticipated that only one
bridge area will be selected for testing due to existing problems at the
bridge and possible widening at that location.
We propose four standard penetration borings extended to a depth of 50
feet for determining bearing capacity of the subsoil strata. The geotechnical
report will provide details of the exploration, boring log data, profiles of
existing soils, laboratory testing, and foundation recommendations.
A structural evaluation by a qualified Professional Engineer specializing
1n bridges 1S not included in this phase.
It can be accomplished as a
separate report and that fee schedule is also attached. The structural
evaluation will be performed only on authorization from Post, Buckley, Schuh,
and Jernigan and will include visual observations of the bridge system,
limited field testing, review of available data on the oridge, and a report
detailing our findings.
As it is anticipated that only one bridge will be selected, the fees have
been based on a per bridge basis. If additional bridges are to be evaluated
at the same time, then a reduction of the mobilization and report fees will be
established.
We are aware that FOOT has conducted at least one load test on a
bridge on Drew Street and anticipate that those results can be obtained from
the State.
~
!
I
I
Revised: Sept. 27, 1991
August 7, 1991
Bridge Structures
Geotechnical Exploration
Per Bridge
1. Standard Penetration Borings:
4 at 50' = 200' at $9/ft. $1,800.00
2. Mobilization: 150.00
3, Geologist Field Time:
2 days at $400/day 800.00
4. Laboratory.Testing: 350.00
5. Engineering Evaluation: 500.00
TOTAL: $3,600.00
~
~
$
I
I
DREW STREET PD&E STUDY
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FEE PROPOSAL
NOTE:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The aerial photography work effort will be done by ACA, Inc. (see
attached for basis of estimate).
The total estimated fee ($6000) presented here to complete this task
is included in PBS&J Direct/Reimbursable Expenses.
The aerial coverage used in this estimate is 3 miles (total project
length).
I. Total flight cost to produce 1"=50'/200' scale black and white photo mylars:
TOTAL FLIGHT COST $3000
II. Cost of individual scale mylars:
Scale
1"=50'
1"=200'
Number
of Sheets
12
4
Cost
per Sheet
$140
140
Fee
$1680
560
$2240
TOTAL REPRODUCI10N COST
III. TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
Total (I + II above) = $5240
Misc. (add. mylars, etc.) = 760
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $6000
REVISED 11-11-91
08.07 91 18:17
-al~07S.55S:!50
:\ERI.\.L l.."RT!)GR."-P
.0-
~CP;::
I - .
I
~..,""C"
.I . l .
I ~
/
\ " \
, . \ "-.-/ .\~,
. ER1AL C' q.,-r-.,..'.......ApUi,...S --'r- ,', ~ 1r-..-,1,.-.... [!\l^
'" , . r-,! \ ; .....;'-...:A H j 11.'-' 0 r t-\lv eM i..-I'"\, I. \...-.
17')? '^.' C12~ Ridge P.c~d .O:"i2~.dQ, FL 32?09
;,~~~i7) 25~.:Sa() F.A.X'(L.Gi~ 3.35-..~25Q .
TO:
[)-'"..... Kelly. .
. PelS:, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan - Tampa.
From~
. Jim Humphrey
Subiect:
J
Drew St;reef PD&E Study
. ACA Proposal # 4515
Date: August 7, .1.991 .
Tns rollovving is a breakdown of ACA'.s fees to proquce the req!.Jestedaerial photography:
and photo enlargements per the faxedspecificctions from your-office~ .
1)
. Aerial photography to produce ~n= 50'/10Q'/2Qcr/400'.black a'1d white phcto
screenedmylar.eniargernents and color photography. to produCe'1.".= 200" Color
enlargements;. . . .
, TOTAL FEES
. $3,300.00 ..
(If the 1" = 400~ prodllcts are removed fr~m t'i~ scope, the- f;ierial flight would .be
reduced by $300.00) . . : _. . ... . _... .
, TOTAL FUGHT COSTS
$3,300;.00 .
2) "Unco':ltrolled haJftonescre~ne~ my!ar.enlargements. as foHow~::'
Scale
First .
Copy: .
(Eac,!) ..
EaCh .
.Addmonal
. Estimated T ota! Fees
.1~ == 50'
1" = 100'
1u =_200'
11';400
$140
c $140
. . $140,.
$140'
. _ $60
. $60'
. .
$60
. $60
. . -30shts.=.:$4;200
, .8- shtS = $1,120
.. 4 shts =$560
.. . .2 shtS =$. 280. '
Plus an estimated addruonal.copy of each above woutd be
. . '. . - 52.640 . '.
OS 07 91
1," , , -
.) .....;
~1-i07 S 5 5 :~-;.~.U
AERIAL (ARTGGFAP
~ ~11.) ;~\
tI
i
I
Page T we
.......... .-' - i Ie.'" ~_s-, "r" .f"!- ;_.._".;~
t"G~r, t:SU~K..,y, ___!...i !Un 6. u~i' :~..~n .
D~opOSal .. ~ -1-
, I T"T~ 0
August?, 1881
~) 'L1.n,.r~nrr' :"1if~ri r";.')!r:r j:;nbrn~ment~.
_ , ."-'''"'''', t . _..__ __"":".1_ --.. .,_ ~...... '; ~
Scaie
'. First
Copy
(Ear::h) .
Each
. Additional
. Estimated Total Fees.
1" =.200'. $120
$50.
4 .shts = $ 200
TOTAl:. ESTIMATED LAB COSTS.
$9,000
ShOUld you hav~ any questions; please .calIme..
. .
. Regards,
. . C}~nw kIu~V1fJMt~}-
..'tJ~mes.~. Hum~re;l/ .
L0peratons Manag8f/
JHH/Cp
.AEPL4.~ CARTOG;::::;.A.~~;CS OF A~J=;::::CA. ~NC. . ~ i22 \",;.- C:~~k Rt:~~ H~2.:!! C:-L=::l;=~~ =!_.3~:')9 ... ;!~OT: -~~ ..?5S.C ... ~A:(.('~i, 355-8250