Loading...
FLD2011-02009; 333 HAMDEN DR; DIDOMIZIO INVESTMENT INC A FLORIDA CORPORATIONFLD2011-02009 333 HAMDEN DR Date Received: 2/28/20112:56:30 PM Didomizio Investment, Inc. a Florida Corportion ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III CDB Meeting Date: May 17, 2011 Case Number: FLD2011-02009 Agenda Item: E.6. Owner: Didomizio Investments, Inc. a Florida Corporation Applicant: Didomizio Investments, Inc. a Florida Corporation Representative: Woods Consulting (Terri Skapik) Addresses: 333 Hamden Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVLOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of 392 square feet of dock area (including two piers) for a total of 852 square feet to an existing commercial dock associated with an overnight accommodation in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in the width of the dock from 30 feet (24 percent of the lot length) to 83.1 feet (66 percent of the lot width), and an increase to the length of the dock from 13 feet (10.4 percent of the lot width) to 21 feet (16.8 percent of the lot width) under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-601.C.3. ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist (T) District FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) Category PROPERTY USE: Current: Commercial Dock (in association with an existing overnight accommodation use) Proposed: Commercial Dock (in association with an existing overnight accommodation use) EXISTING North: SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: South: East West: Preservation (P) District Clearwater Harbor Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations Tourist (T) District Condominiums Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The subject property consists of 0.38 acres with a 21 unit hotel that has an accessory dock. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Brightwater and Hamden Drives within the Small Motel District of the Beach by Design Special Area Plan. The parcel is located on Clearwater Harbor and has approximately 140 feet of waterfront frontage (125 feet measured Community Development Board - May 17, 2011 F1,132011-02009 - Page 1 of 6 along the seawall). It is bounded by Hamden Drive (west), Brightwater Drive (south), and Clearwater Harbor (north and east). The property is surrounded by a similar uses. The properties located directly across Hamden Drive and Brightwater Drive consists of overnight accommodations. The adjacent property consists of condominiums. Similar land uses dominate the immediate area. Development Proposal: The expansion of the subject dock has already been completed. This request is for an after the fact approval to legally allow the portion of the dock (including two piers) that has been expanded to remain. As built, 392 square feet of decking area has been added to an existing dock for a total of 852 square feet of dock area. The existing dock has been extended from 30 feet to 83.1 feet along the seawall that is 125 feet in width. The length of the dock has also been extended outward into Clearwater Harbor from 13 feet to 21 feet. However, this increase of 8 feet of dock length reflects the two new piers which extend out 21 feet from the waterfront property line or seawall. The piers were built approximately 10.5 feet east of the main dock. The length of the main dock has remained at 13 feet which is the same length of the dock prior to its expansion. A roof strucure has been added to the middle section of the dock which stands approximately 10 feet above the mean high water line. One tie pole is located 28 feet outward of the seawall and setback 3 feet from the northern extended property line. No covered boatlifts or vertical walls have been built. The deck and piers are privately owned and operated by the hotel and will be used only by hotel guests. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-601.C.3, a commercial dock is any dock, pier or wharf, including boatlifts, that is used in connection with a hotel, motel or restaurant where the slips are not rented, leased or sold; or such facilities constructed and maintained by the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County or by any state or federal agency. Commercial docks shall only be permitted as a Level Two (flexible development) use. As such, it is subject to the relevant review criteria. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS: The dimensional standards criteria for setbacks set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h state that docks shall be located no closer to any property line as extended into the water than the distance equivalent to ten percent of the width of the waterfront property line. The width of the waterfront property line on the subject property is 125 feet; therefore the proposed dock/piers must be set back from both the east and west extended property lines a minimum of 12.5 feet. The west side of the existing dock is currently set back 26.1 feet and the east side will be setback 16.3 feet from the eastern property line. The setbacks exceed the minimum required side setback and are compliant with the standards in the CDC. With regards to width, commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line. As mentioned above, the length of the seawall is 125 feet. Thus, the maximum width of the dock can be 93.75 feet. The dock has been extended from 30 feet to 83.1 feet along the waterfront property line. The 83.1 foot width of the dock is 66 percent of the width of the subject property, well below the 75 percent standard. The dock is consistent with this Code provision. Community Development Board - May 17, 2011 FLD2011-02009 - Page 2 of 6 The same threshold that applies to width also applies to length; therefore the length of the dock is limited to 93.75 feet. As previously stated, the length of the dock has been extended outward into Clearwater Harbor from 13 feet to 21 feet. This increase of dock length reflects the two new piers which extend out 21 feet from the waterfront property line or seawall. The length of the main dock has remained at 13 feet which is the same length of the dock prior to its expansion. Nonetheless, the piers are extending less than the maximum allowable length making each compliant with the standards of the code. In regards to the roof structure which covers the subject dock, CDC Section 3-601.C.1.k. only permits roof structures on publicly owned facilities. Since the subject dock is a private dock to be used only for purposes related to the hotel, the roof structure must be removed from the dock. The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h: Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Dock Setbacks 10% of the width of the subject property (12.5 feet) East: 16.3 feet X (Minimum) 10% of the width of the subject property (12.5 feet) West: 26.1 feet x Dock Length 75% of the width of the subject property (93.75 feet) 21 feet X (Maximum) Dock Width 75% of the width of the subject property (93.75 feet) 83.1 feet x (Maximum) Community Development Board -May 17, 2011 FLD2011-02009 - Page 3 of 6 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency with the Flexibility criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.a-g. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. Consistent Inconsistent a. Use and Compatibility: X i) The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property; ii) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general; and iii) The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. b. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities: The use of the proposed dock shall X not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. c. Impacts on Navigation: The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a X detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. d. Impacts on Marine Environment: X i) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas; and ii) Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. e. Impacts on Water Quality: X i) All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum); and ii) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. f Impacts on Natural Resources: X i) The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest; and ii) The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. g. Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands: The dock shall not have a material adverse X affect upon the uplands surrounding. Community Development Board - May 17, 2011 FLD2011-02009 - Page 4 of 6 The proposed dock is subordinate to the overnight accommodation use. Many docks to the north and east extend much further into waterway. Thus, staff has determined the proposed dock to be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties, the neighborhood and the general vicinity. Regarding impacts on water recreation activities, navigation, marine environment, water quality, natural resources and wetlands the City Harbormaster has reviewed the dock proposal and indicates that there is compliance with those criteria. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual. acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. As previously discussed the development of the land (submerged) relating to scale, bulk, coverage, density and character with adjacent properties and the immediate vicinity have been found to be consistent. The dock and piers will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development or redevelopment of adjacent properties. Moreover, the dock and piers are consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The dock and piers will not affect the health or safety of persons working or residing in the neighborhood as they meet state and local guidelines by not extending past the 25 percent waterway width and no tie poles extend beyond 50 feet of the dock or piers. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no other outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of April 7, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the May 17, 2011, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: Community Development Board - May 17, 2011 FLD2011-02009 - Page 5 of 6 I . That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Residential Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the 0.38 acres is located on the northeast side of Hamden Drive at the intersection of Brightwater Drive and Hamden Drive; 3. That the parcel is located in the Small Motel District of Beach by Design; 4. That the site has approximately 125 feet of waterfront frontage/seawall on Clearwater Harbor between the north and south property lines; 5. That the proposal does not require any deviations and as constructed its width and length are compliant with the Dock Standards in the CDC; 6. That the development proposal is compatible with dock patterns of the surrounding area; 7. That the applicant is correcting a code violation by applying for Level Two approval; 8. That the roof structure on the subject dock is not compliant with the Dock Standards in the CDC and must be removed; and 9. That there are no other outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the width and length of the subject dock is consistent with the commercial dock review criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C.3.; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per CDC Section 3-913.A; and 3. That the roof structure on the subject dock is not consistent with CDC Section 3-601.C.3.k. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of 392 square feet of dock area (including two piers) for a total of 852 square feet to an existing commercial dock associated with an overnight accommodation in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in the width of the dock from 30 feet (24 percent of the lot length) to 83.1 feet (66 percent of the lot width), and an increase to the length of the dock from 13 feet (10.4 percent of the lot width) to 21 feet (16.8 percent of the lot width) under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-601.C.3. with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the roof structure on the subject dock shall be removed in compliance with CDC Section 3-601.C.3.k.; 2. That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; and 3. That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit and any other applicable environmental permits, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kevin W. umberger, Planner III Community Development Board - May 17, 2011 FLD2011-02009 - Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs S.• (Planning DepartmentlC D BTLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBWamden 333 Didomizio Investments (Dock) (T) -2011.xx. kwn033 Hamden - Staff Report.docx Community Development Board - May 17, 2011 FLD2011-02009 - Page 7 of 6 Kevin Nurnberger 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562- ,myclearwater. com kevin. nurnberger(& PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2010 to March 2011 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building permits Business tax receipts and Landscape plans. Planner I County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Manage case load of planning applications and conduct site visits. I met with residents and neighborhood organizations regarding new existing residential development projects as directed. I led pre-application meetings with residents, contractors and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 I helped to enforce Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. I assisted on site during the archeological process though out the pre- development stage. Development Planner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Assisted the Cultural Resources Manager in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects. Reviewed site plans to ensure protection of historic properties. Supervised and participated in historical surveys and research in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation planning and the Federal installations and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. I developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, comprehensive plans. The Virginia Department of Transportation plan and Virginia Power's public utility plan. I acted as a resource to the community to educate them on the matter of historic preservation. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, LA 2000 to 2005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Evaluated zoning and subdivision applications prepared and presented preliminary staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. I participated in the community and neighbourhood workshops that focused on remapping and rezoning portions of the city in support of the proposed new Comprehensive zoning ordinance. EDUCATION University of New Orleans, LA MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004) State University of New York at Buffalo, NY BA Anthropology (1999) / ""ef g Causeway Blvd 0 0 i z O 4EVo CO seGOND OF? S1r N DR u ST PROJECT o SITE >z RIFT WATER DR FTFTH -- va 0 BAYSIDE Z o R S !"? ? BLVD //i ?W u'L ? ?(/ 4 VD J L ?? gy SM A LOCATION Owner: Didomizio Investments, Inc. Case: FLD201 1-02009 Site: 333 Hamden Dr. Property Size: .389 acres PIN: 08-29-15-04932-000-0560 Atlas Page: 276A 51 ?ryh A ? 229 50 L 301 _i LL 1 2 49 48 c y N 3RD ST 47 " o 251 4 45 z i 301 1 3 30 5 w N 3052 1 6 309 0 107 309 W ,A 31a1 108 312 ? 315 09 316 J& 2 31 191FCTR 317 16 110 320 319 5 A 63 111 326 321 323 6 64 325 326 3 327 7 3 3A 32$5 113 114 331 8 4 330 4A 66 333 115 3339 5 332 0 3 7 56 67 6 33 ' 116 34 T A BRIGHTyyATE O W 46 BLVD RS 2 4 5 3 g 9 48 68 117 347 6 0 6 341 0 1 0 0 0 343 11 342 `?` 7 69 118 345 7 345 0a BRIGHT BRIGHTWA TER DR 12 WATER 351 70 119 348 O SEE S08 9-1% 346 34 " FOR PAR L INFO 2 1 3 5 35,41 120 353 13 9 3 45 4 6 1 9 10 5TH ST 323000 Q 14 A COMMON 1 AREA 10 350 Q 5 401 ? DA IR = ST ST 72 ,z, ? 401 Q 73 122 1 ,2 406 O 4052 -A 74 Q 11 Z 75 124 Q I 9 3 10 410 1 2 76 125 41 U 3 5 R 120 13 ?C "O 4 5 7 g c 10 11 n o 9 4 ?. 420 a " " n ,zs ,N ip N BA YS IDE DR s e 420 41s EXISTING USE Owner: Didomizio Investments, Inc. Case: FLD2011-02009 Site: 333 Hamden Dr. Property Size: .389 acres PIN: 08-29-15-04932-000-0560 Atlas Page: 276A 229 301 MIRD ST L^ d y O h 301 251 a z 300 305 305 O 309 309 311 312 315 316 315 316 19LDCTR 317 16 P 320 319 326 321 323 325 326 3 327 325 331 330 333 333 332 B 333 347 ATE/p D o 0 341 ? 347 343 342 M ? a v voi 351 A. 345 345 o a o ^ ^ 348 O 346 Q 347 ^ 355 0 353 348 5 35 ? V 40 0 o F/F N T 1 Sr = 40' 4 P 06 9 405 40,9 410 O 415 0 T o L 71 / ¦ o 420 ^ o ry L 420 415 BA YS/DE DR ZONING Owner: Didomizio Investments, Inc. Case: FLD201 1-02009 Site: 333 Hamden Dr. Property Size: .389 acres PIN: 08-29-15-04932-000-0560 Atlas Page: 276A r h ? 1 , 4"Al AERIAL Owner: Didomizio Investments, Inc. Case: FLD2011-02009 Site: 333 Hamden Dr. Property Size: .389 acres PIN: 08-29-15-04932-000-0560 Atlas Page: 276A Looking W at subject dock from Hamden Drive 333 Hamden Drive FLD2011-02009 Looking E at subject dock and adjacent docks from Hamden Drive Looking N along Hamden Drive at surrounding docks Looking NE from Hamden Drive at subject dock Looking E at subject property toward Brightwater Drive from Hamden Drive. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 07/11/2008) Planning Department CASE #: Ic i?'??V?? 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initials): Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED: Telephone: 727-5624567 Fax: 727-5624865 V SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Q' SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets Id SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 (( SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ $1,205.00 Didomizio Investments, Inc., a Florida Corporation * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 648 Poinsettia Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33767 FAX NUMBER: 727441-9582 727-543-3081 EMAIL: john@didomi;eioinv.com Didomizio Investments, Inc., John Didomizio Woods Consulting, Terri Skapik 1714 County Road 1, Suite 22, Dunedin, Florida 34698 727-786-5747 FAX NUMBER: 727-786-7479 NA EMAIL: tarritkanik0w B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 333 Hamden Dock 333 Hamden Drive 08/29/15/04932/000/0560 0.389 acres BAYSIDE SUB NO. 2 LOTS 56 AND 57 PROJECT VALUATION: $ 5,000 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 16,945 sq ft_? PROPOSED USE(S): Commercial hotel/motel (less than 49 units) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: After-the-fact approval for new decking at an existing over-water deck and piers. Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square ---------- ---__ ____-_. footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of C Documents and SettingsWerekrergusonXDesktopV!&u <ng dept forms 0708TIaxibie Dvieiopment(FLD) 200807.11.doc Page 1 of 7 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO V (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) G,7 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) V Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached Exhibit A 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly Impair the value thereof. See Attached Exhibit A 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached Exhibit A 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attached Exhibit A 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attached Exhibit A 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attached Exhibit A CaDoaiments erd Seti;ngs\derek tecpu;onlL? sktnphlannin0 dept fames 0708iFIerhle D.:vatopment (FLD) 2cos 07.1 Ldoc Nize2of 7 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: See attached Exhibit B E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) Not applicable, uplands are currently developed ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stommwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. t? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; Q` All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; V Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; P' Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable `7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwaler plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative Is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor t? elevations shall be provided. NO UPLAND DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED CAUTION -- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) V SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (OBH 4- or greater), and location, Including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a 'certified arborist°, of all trees 4- DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. a LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; D PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits brill not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided'); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C.'Documents and Sat ngslderek fer0UsonXNsktopVn1anm*mp dept fortes D70519,ia'e Day.*iopment (FLD) 2008 07-11 doa Pane 3 of 7 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) id SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ? North arrow; ? Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ? All dimensions; ? Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ? Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ? All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of ail required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor fighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typfcais of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area In square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the ? number of required spaces; ? Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; ? Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; ?_ impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'%X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Information on site plan: ? One-fool contours or spot elevations on site; ? Offsfte elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; ? Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ? Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ? Streets and drives (dimensioned); ? Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C.Oocuments and SettngsbJerek farcusoniDa<k1npY.!enn?nq dept farms 07031FIex=b!e De;-Iopment (FLD) 2008 07-11.duc Page 4 or7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 361: ?_ All existing and proposed structures; ? Names of abutting streets; ? Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ? Sight visibility triangles; ? Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ? Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) Indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all ?._ existing and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and common names; ? Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, soil mixes, badd"illing, mulching and protective measures; ? Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by Hie Community Development Board); ? Irrigation notes. U REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); U COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) U BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS-with Hie following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; U REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/r X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) U AU EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), Indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. D All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) U Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). U Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C%?oarments and Sett-ngsidarek ter0usanls s:?iop!p±anning dept tom's 0708tFlelibla DsYalopment (FLD) 2008 07-1 r tloc Page 5 of 7 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.0) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: . Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting` held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. V Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning moverment at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. J Traffic Impact Study is not required. \/) CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the Impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevenfion Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1442 (Annex H) is required. V Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationstwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/ Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. (t" / CAUTION ® IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application, Signature of property owner of iepiesentative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this cV 4j day of A.D. 20_Ll to me and/or by s- r ?r ` a ' C who is personally known has produced Li as identification. Notary public, ti MARTISFMS My commission expires: Notsrypubtc,woof e)plnsAugust C.®ocumcris and Sag;ng*Jotek fafgusonD.,s%1vp1p1anning dept forms 0706Tter_=c:e Davefopment (FLD) 2038 07-11. dw Phew 6 of 7 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: i. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: Didomizio Investments, Inc., a Florida Corporation 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 333 Hamden Drive, Clearwater, Florida 1 That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Review for commercial decking and piers 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint Terri Skapik of Woods Consulting, 1714 County Road 1, Suite 22, Dunedin, FL 34698 as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. Thal this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is true and correct. y.9+mer. -- - Property Owner Property owner Property Owner _ __ STATE Of FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS }. , r•? Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this c? ' `/ day of - htrc- ly > C?f/ personally appeared h? f i?Ya Ire; 2. d who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. MARTISM y Notary Pt[Mc, Mate of Florida ? Comtnlttsl0nt EE 18852 _ Myoomm.expiresAupuat18.2014 I e? .._. Notary Public Signature Notary Sea[/Stamp My Commission Expires: (-- -/f'- - /y C:lDowrnents and Sett ngskhrck fergus0n1De5ktoptplamv"n9 dept forms 07081F1e)ob;e De.z!opmcrd (FLD) 2008 07-1 i.doa I'aee 7 or7 Tropical Breeze Resort 333 Hamden Drive Flexible Development Application Request: The Applicant is requesting after-the-fact approval for the repair and refurbishment of a commercial deck and two finger piers. The added' decking is 14 ft x 22 ft, or 308 sq ft. The two piers are each 21 ft x 2 ft, or 84 sq ft. Therefore, the total refurbished area is 392 sq ft. The deck area was 460 sq ft so now there is a total area of 852 sq ft. Exhibit A Tropical Breeze Resort 333 Hamden Drive Section D of Flexible Development Application The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The deck refurbishing and piers meet the dimensional criteria of docks allowed at this waterfront property. The structures do not encroach into the required side setback areas or exceed the maximum length and/or width allowed for docking facilities. By meeting the minimum dock codes, the structures are in harmony with the scale and bulk of docking facilities in the immediate area. The canals in the immediate area are currently developed with docking facilities (see attached Figure 1). The docks immediately adjacent to the property are summarized as follows: • 300 and 316 Hamden Drive: there are currently multiple docks with 20+ wet slips along Hamden Drive. In November of 2009 these properties were approved to have the existing docks removed and be replaced with a new 18-slip commercial docking facility for use by new upland hotels. 110 Brightwater Drive: there is currently a dock with up to two boat slips at this property. The dock and slips are used in conjunction with a condominium that is approved for apartment rentals. Please note the Harborside, Belle Aqua and Brightwater Cove condominiums, all located on Brightwater Drive, have docks and boat slips for residential use. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and building or significantly impair the value thereof. The deck refurbishing and piers meet the dimensional criteria of docks allowed and therefore will not discourage development or use of the adjacent properties. As noted above, the structures comply with the setback, width and length standards of Section'3- 601.C.3.h of the community development code. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The deck and piers are for the use of the hotel guests. The hotel will ensure the appropriate use of the structures by addressing appropriate behavior, enforcing proper use of boating equipment, enforcing proper use boating and navigation waterways, boater education, and environmental education. 4. The proposed development is designed to avoid traffic congestion. The expansion and refurbishing of the decking and piers does not impact traffic. The deck and piers are for use by hotel patrons and are not rented to the public. It is possible that if hotel guests travel to the hotel by boat, this will serve to decrease traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The decking and piers are consistent with zoning, land use and the docks in the immediate area. The Clearwater Beach area is dependent on waterfront developments and waterfront amenities to attract tourists. By having waterfront amenities in the form of decking and piers for the hotel guests, this will improve the tourism and community character of the area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on the adjacent properties. By refurbishing the old decking and constructing the piers, this has resulted in a net improvement of the site visually. There are no negative adverse acoustic affects anticipated and there no adverse olfactory effects anticipated as there is no sewage pumpout station proposed, trash receptacles will be emptied by hotel employees daily to make sure there are no garbage odors, and there will be no fish cleaning stations onsite. The hours of operation will be consistent with the hours of operation of the upland hotel. Exhibit B Tropical Breeze Resort 333 Hamden Drive Flexible Development Criteria SECTION 3-601C.3 (a) through (i) a. Use and Compatibility. The deck and piers are consistent with zoning, land use and are consistent with the docks that are in the immediate area. The use of the decks and piers will be by the hotel guests only and will not be rented or sold to the general public, b. There are no negative impacts on existing water recreation activities. The proposed deck refurbishing and piers actually improve water recreation activities at this location. As the structures are all consistent and compliant with the dimensional criteria for docks, the structures will not impede water recreation activities of adjacent or nearby properties. As noted, the Clearwater Beach area is dependent on waterfront developments and waterfront amenities to attract tourists. C. There are no negative impacts to navigation anticipated. The decking and piers are compatible with setback, length and width criteria established by the Community Development Code and do not extend into the waterway as such to impede use of the waterway at this location. d. There are no negative Impacts on the marine environment anticipated. The decking and piers were constructed in areas where there were no protected resources. e. There are no negative impacts to water quality anticipated. Only decking was added so there were no impacts to water quality with this work. Additionally, there is no fueling, pump out, repair services, etc to be performed at the deck or piers. f. There are no negative impacts to natural resources anticipated. As noted above, the decking and piers were constructed in areas where there were no protected resources. g. There were no negative impacts on wetlands habitat on the uplands as there is 17o wetland vegetation (such as mangroves) on the property. h. Dimensional Standards. (i) The property width measured at the seawalled shoreline is 125 feet. The required setback on each side is 10% of the property width as measured at the seawalled shoreline, or 12.5 feet. The actual setback to the west is 21.1 ft and the setback to the east is 16.3 feet. (i) The maximum length allowed is 75% of the property width, or 93.75 ft. The existing structures only extend into the waterway a maximum length of 21 ft. (ii) The maximum dock width allowed is 75% of the property width, or 93.75 ft. The proposed dock is only 83.1 ft wide. (iv) There are no proposed covered slips. (v) There are no deviations from the requirements of this section being requested as part of this application. i. The deck and piers are privately owned and operated by the hotel and will be used only by hotel guests. CITY OF CLEARWATER a PLANNING c,'? DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT /` S-Z t}QST OFFICE Box I7i9 , CLE.?ItNY-A'fER FLORIDA 33758-4748 ??01 ?%irNlcu?Al. SERVICES Bull-DING, '_ Q Yr ? 100 SOUTH )1YR1LE AVLNUL, CLEARWAXLR, FLORIDA 33756 ATERTELEPHONE (7 2 !) 562-456' Ftx (j 27) 67-45'6 +urr 09.00 Case number: FLD201 1-02009 -- 333 HAMDEN DR Owner(s): Didomizio Investments Inc 648 Poinsettia Ave N Clearwater, FL 33767-1513 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Didomizio Investments Inc 648 Poinsettia Ave N Clearwater, FL 33767-1513 PHONE: 7275433081, Fax: 7274419582, Email: John@didomizioinx.Com Representative: Terri Skapik 1714 Country Road 1 Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 PHONE: 7277865747, Fax: No fax, Email: Terriskapik@woodsconsulting.Org Location: Located at the northeast corner at the intersection of Hamden Drive and Brightwater Drive. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of 392 square foot of dock area (including two catwalks) to an existing commercial dock for a total of 852 square foot of area in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in the length of the dock from 30 feet (24 percent of the lot length) to 83.1 feet (66 percent of the lot width) and an increase to the width of the dock from 13 feet (10.4 percent of the lot width ) to 21 feet (16.8 percent of the lot width), under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-601.C.3. Proposed Use: Marina Facilities Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner II 3/31/2011 1 DRC Comments "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ADD AFFONI li E ACTION 51PLC}YER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Environmental Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning Review 1. Label and dimension the property line at the waterfront/seawall. Planning Review 2. Label and dimension the width of the dock. Planning Review 3. Provide a table showing required setbacks and proposed/existing setbacks. Stormwater Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Eng Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 3/31/2011 2 DRC Comments "EQUAL Eh1PUM'INiERT 'LND AFFIRNLATJVE Acrloti E:.iPLOYER° SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET 0 - TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET 1 - LOCATION MAP SHEET 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH COLOR AERIAL SHEET 3 - DOCK PLAN VIEW SHEET 4 - CROSS SECTION A - A' SHEET 5 - CROSS SECTION B - B' SHEET 6 - DEPTHS IN FEET AT MEAN LOW WATER SHEET 7 - DOCK DETAILS SHEET 8 - DOCK DETAILS SHEET 9 - DOCK DETAILS Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:47am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg SHEET 0 FLORIDA CER ?j1914j OF AUTHOR 4i MUNICIPALITY E WOODS CONSULTING 333 HAMDEN DRIVE 15588 * 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN 34698 8 E • Q FA PH. X ? 727 727? 7479 7 FAX 786- TABLE OF CONTENTS •• of ? 2?? ? ? ?` ?? - ? 0*; ? • REVISED: 04-11-11 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 0 WATERWAY WIDTH 385 •.. ?? • •`Fi`r?? . WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 1lAll MHW +0.7? MLW -1.2' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) CLEARWATER BEACH I ?1 1 r , 333 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 yam: PARCEL 1D# l f 08/29/1510493=00/0560 ? - LAT: 27.971957 - j `` LON:82.827517 r j ?,? I ( Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:48am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg SHEET FLORIDA CE `F,19 TE OF AUTHO 4 MUNICIPALITY ?GENSLr • 5. -. WOODS CONSULTING 333 HAMDEN DRIVE ? e 1558 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 * PH DU FL 34698 .NE 7 85747 FAX ?2727? 8 786-7479 OCATION MAP F so 4 4 !' ? ?? • REVISED: 04-11-11 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 385 0 WATERWAY ?, .? •. ? ,* s•x ••••??,?? NA . WIDTH WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 ' ?`RV "` MHW +07 MLW -1.2' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1:20 COMMERCIAL Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) N s AIIIIIIIIIIIIII REFURBISHED STRUCTURES (392.0 SQ FT) TOTAL SQ FT (852.0 SID FT) cn m SEE SHEET 5 FOR D CROSS SECTION B - B' 3.0 STAIRS 13.6 SEE SHEET 4 FOR 2'0 ~ Z A' ?P CROSS SECTION A - A' 2 B? QP 21.1 I 42 22 0 " HIGH RAILING ROOF AREA a o ? 28.0 0 21.0 Ix , W SEAWALL PARCEL 6.0 -- 3.5 14.0 10.5 16.3 BOUNDARY 26.1 A 10.3 B 83.1 PARCEL 125.0 BOUNDARY Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:46am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg SHEET 3 FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUT N #27664 G.?P ' E lV S•F?y?i?? • 333 HAM D E N DRIVE TABLE 1. DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA `Q * 1 568 •• '?'? WOODS CONSULTING DOCK PLAN VIEW LENGTH OF WATERFRONT = 125 FT • :?t 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 N MINIMUM REQUIRED SIDE SETBACKS = 12.5 FT '?' ' PH. (7275 786 747 FAX (727 786-7479 EXISTING WEST SETBACK = 21.1 FT ?• TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 EXISTING EAST SETBACK = 16.3 FT WATERWAY WIDTH 385.0 MAXIMUM WIDTH & LENGTH ALLOWED = 93 8 FT R ? .25.0 WATERFRONT WIDTH 1 . ?;? ....`•????? REVISED: 04-11-11 MHW +0.7' MLW -1.2 EXISTING OVERALL WIDTH = 83.1 FT ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 EXISTING MAX. LENGTH = 21 FT SCALE: 1:10 COMMERCIAL Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 42" RAILING 11 H +2.54' NAVD-88 MHW +0.7 .F MLW -1.2 BOTTOM CONTOUR SEAWALL CROSS SECTION A -A' SEE SHEET 3 FOR CROSS SECTION LOCATION Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:48am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg SHEET 4 FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTH 7664 MUNICIPALITY ,•°?o?: " ? k•s'?F`'•-, 8 ? WOODS CONSULTING 333 HAMDEN DRIVE : Q: • 1 ? ?• I ?i 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 FAX PH. (727 786-5747 FAX ((727) 786-7479 DOCK PLAN VIEW • • ? • d0 : ? ? REVISED: 04-11-11 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 0 WATERWAY WIDTH 385 ?i • •• •• , ??,?? , . WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 +07 1 2' A?- ?• ??` . MHW MLW - I •''?? ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1:10 COMMERCIAL Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) +2.54' NAVD-88 MHW +0.7 MLW -1.2 BOTTOM CONTOUR SEAWALL CROSS SECTION B - B' SEE SHEET 3 FOR CROSS SECTION LOCATION Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:48am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg SHEET rj FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTH 10!11 #27664 MUNICIPALITY jkK ?` • 0 '• / ? WOODS CONSULTING 333 HAMDEN DRIVE ? ?/ ? ? 40 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 . : P (727 786-5747 FAX X ((727 786-7479 DOCK PLAN VIEW • ? iO S 10 o j + z ?? •b Z REVISED: 04-11-11 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 • i ? f ? 0 385 ?r ; • *? . WATERWAY WIDTH , ' ? • WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 '••• ? ? ?? •' MHW +07 MLW -1.2 - ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 ???• SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL It is the intent of the following construction details to be a reference guide for quality, structural and safety standards. All structures to meet local, and or state guidelines for aquatic and marine construction. GENERAL DOCK NOTES: Application # 1. ALL DECKING TO BE TRIMMED, BOTH SIDES. 2. ALL PILINGS TO BE SEATED WITH A FREE FALLING HAMMER IF WATER JETTING IS INSTALLATION METHOD. ALL PILES TO BE TRIMMED SAME HEIGHT. 3. PILING CENTER TO CENTER SPACING ON ALL FIXED DOCKS TO BE 10' NOMINAL. AND NOT TO EXCEED 12'. 4. DOCK FRAMING AND DECKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS (SCREWS TO BE TYPE SPECIFIC FOR MATERIAL UTILIZED). 5. WOOD DECK BOARD SPACING AT TIME OF INSTALLATION NOT TO EXCEED 1/8" TO ALLOW FOR CURING, COMPOSITE DECK SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 1/4". 6. ALL DOCK FRAMING OTHER THAN DECKING TO BE MINIMUM GRADE 2 LUMBER. 7. RASP OR FEATHER ALL SAWCUTS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET OR EXCEED COUNTY REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS 166-(332,333, & 334) OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY REGULATIONS MANUAL. 9. CCA WOOD NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR DECKING OR RAILING MATERIALS. WOOD TREATMENT AS FOLLOWS ARE ACCEPTABLE: ALKALINE COPPER QUATERNARY (ACQ), IF ACID TREATMENT IS UTILIZED, THEN THE WOOD NEEDS TO BE SEALED WITH AN ENGINEER-APPROVED SEALANT. 10. IF A MAIN DOCK SUPPORT PILING FALLS INCLOSE PROXIMITY (LESS THAN 2 FEET) TO A BOLLARD PILING REQUIRED FOR A FINGER PIER, THE BOLLARD PILING MAY BE USED FOR BOTH PURPOSES PROVIDING THE CENTER TO CENTER SPANS OF THE DOCK SUPPORT PILINGS DO NOT EXCEED 12 FEET. 11. 5/8" GALVANIZED FASTENERS ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WOOD WITH COPPER AZOLE TREATMENT 12. ALL WOOD PLANKING WHICH IS TO BE OVER AN AREA OF SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 8" WIDE AND HAVE A MINIMUM SPACING OF NO LESS THAN 1/2" APART AFTER SHRINKAGE. 13. PILINGS TO BE INSTALLED IN AREAS CONTAINING SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, TO BE INSTALLED BY JETTING WITH A 3" PUMP REDUCED TO A 1-4" (JET PIPE), AUGERING AND DRIVING. SHOULD ANY ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT OCCUR AT THE BASE OF THE PILING, IT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE GRASS AREA. Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:49am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF in's 41 .•? • ?1 WOODS CONSULTING 1714 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. 727 786-5747 FAX 727 786-7479 REVISED: 04-11-11 333 HAMDEN DRIVE DOCK DETAILS TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 WATERWAY WIDTH 385.0 WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 MHW +0.7' MLW -142' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) DECK SCREW PATTERN DOUBLE STRINGERS INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS ONE SCREW INTO EACH INTERMEDIATE STRINGER LAP J INT ?I (NTS) W, STRINGERSMIN. 4'OVERLAP INTERMEDIATE STRINGER 12' MAX. O.C. 10' NOMINAL SPACING O.C. SHEET 7 MUNICIPALITY SCALE: NONE COMMERCIAL I Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) HANDRAIL (WHERE APPLICABLE) STANCHIONS PLACED 5.0' O.C. 2" X 6" 4211 2" X 4" G 2" X 6" STANCHIONS-~ RAILING TO BE FASTENED TO STRINGERS W/ SHORT BOLT, AND FASTENED TO PILE WITH LONGER BOLT WHEN AVAILABLE ALL BOLTING TO BE 5/8" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED MIN, 5/8" WITH OG WASHERS BACKING BOLT AND NUTS OR 5/8" SS IF ACQ TREATED LUMBER IS USED MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING: DEPTHS 8 TO 16 FT. ALL PILE BENTS TO BE CROSS BRACED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY " DEPTHS >16 FT CROSS BRACING IN SHORT & LONG DIRECTION REQUIRED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY EITHER 5/4"X6" SAWN BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, 2" X 6" PT, OR COMPOSITE DECKING 2" X 10" INTERMEDIATE STRINGER MAX. 2.0' O.C. CCA OR ACQ.60 RET. DOUBLE STRINGER 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA OR ACQ.60 RET. 0 0 O p 0 0 0 0 O 0 •;'k- 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET., RACING & BLOCKING •?' MIN 8" TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A. RET. SET BUTT DOWN, MIN 8.0' PENETRATION TYPICAL MARGINAL DOCK 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE EACH SIDE -- SEAWALL NOTE: DECK BOARDS TO BE TRIMMED BOTH SIDES. NOTE: ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE LAP JOINTED AT BENTS 2.0' MIN. 4' I NOM. 3' e o e e e e e SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NAILING PATTERN NAILING PATTERN AT LAP JOINTS FOR DOUBLE STRINGER LAP JOINT PATTERN FOR DOUBLE STRINGERS A A B B MIN. 4' BETWEEN JOINTS Mon, 11 Apr 2011 - 11:49am F:\PROJECTS\333 Hamden (497-10)\CAD\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER\333 HAMDEN DRIVE MASTER REV PER CITY COMMENTS 04-04-11.dwg FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORISATION #27664 18#888?of .yRq©.,, WOODS CONSULTING 333 HAMDEN DRIVE 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE a ?? O ' • • ??? DUNEDIN FL 34698 ?•; c? ?i PH. (727) 786-5747 DOCK DETAILS w FAX FAX ((727 786-7479 s % ??• N,? Z.N. NO, m:m= ` REVISED: 04-11-11 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 392.0 •• .•Gj?? WATERWAY WIDTH 385.0 ' •i? WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 ? •..••• ..• ,? MHW +01' MLW -1.2' ?i._G/111 C.A _.+,??, ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 MUNICIPALITY SHEET 8 FIGURE r . 333 HAMDEN DRIVE AND DOCKS IN IMMEDIATE AREA SCALE 1 :1,741 7DD 0 100 200 300 FEET d: ::JC161655-19 Biti: 15-548 1 7 12/22/200 i -11 .1 -,, AM, !IECORD ING 2 PAGES $16, F?O D DJC STAAI P COLLECTION $21.000.00 FEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELL.'S CGU111` , FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLIM1403 , US u2?? aUD.C?.) PREPARED BY AHD RETURN T0: Emil G. Pratesi, Esquire Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesi & Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, Made this= day of 2006, Between TROPICAL BREEZE OF CLEARWATER BEACH, LLC, a Floriia4 Limited Liability Company, whose address is 163 Bayside DrivV, Clearwater, Florida 33767, grantor. and DIDomino INVESTMENTS) ` INC., a Florida corporation, whose address is 648 Poinsettia Avenue', -' North, Clearwater, Florida 33767, grantee, - WITNESSET13, That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, and other good and valuable consider4eions,tf; said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt wh?reof,is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and so3.d-Ed the.-Raid grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns foz?ver,','.h61f©j,Towinc; described land, situate, lying and being `im,Pinel,Ias County, Florida, to-wit: Lots 56 and 57, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION 140. 2,%acc6rding to the map or plat thereof as regor'deri in P14 Book 27, Pages 32 and 33, of the Puh3sG 1;ekords'of Pinellas County, Florida, SUBJECT TO covenants,`ccinditions, easements and restrictions of recorq, and.snbject to taxes for the year 2007 and subsequent',yearp, Tax Parcel No. 08-29-`1,04932-000-056Q. and said grantor,'?iereby fu,11y`6:arrant the title to said land, and will defend thekkame ag4?nst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. + ,Grantor';', and" -"grantee" are used for singular or pldra ,_&s-cbnt,ext requires. Itd iZITNE$S THEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal,tbe day and year first above written. Sign?cl? sealed and delivered in our.p_re§ence: Nam p rlfz-`1 IC- 41- Y2C?C? C? t_Z Name ? G . P rS TROPICAL BREEZE OF CLEARWATER BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liabilitl?,C _ any By. -1n ?-? ?steo DiGlovanni, _Nfanager • PR?EL?L.gS COU2dTY Z'J, UFF. REC. LT< 15548 PG 531 STATE OF _ COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgements, Agostino DiGiovanni as Manager of TROPICAL BREEZE OF CLEARWATER BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, who is personally known to me - or who has produced as identification, and be is the person described in and who executed the foregoing „ ) Warranty Deed and he acknowledged then and there before me that he executed the same as such manager on behalf of said limited liability company for the purposes therein expressed; and that the - said Deed is the act and deed of said limited liability company, WITN!SgA?y hand and official se this / day of 2006. IT t l 1 I Notary Public My Commission expires; Ianm ?Gtg Emil G. Pratesi 1 Commission 4 DD431062 Expires June 28, 2000 fiu3; fipG.:t E.edl^tff:?laz .tee, l< aS:t51;1) 1 I 1 \ t + i ? I 1 ) f I I ? 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I EGP/dss \TROPICAL\DIDOMIZIO\DEED 2 PLALS BAYSIDE SUBDMSION NO. 2 - .? - '- OLEAMTER, PNELL.AS CMAari, FLORIDA ," •ntc t"u," K w. nta a. T.v. eo w. rtd...c ... p. ,, a c.+.\ .n. a.-+. b yi 2:? 11 NhMI Post Cs\ttC ! OEDCRIPTION rv i? "rI ° ! DEDICATION d ....v.,..t r. w??",M. M••\.M tL.u ? I' ? r • i I ,'r,. ..n..:•v-n.n t.?..a?..o?,,.w?..:t..w...a„>,., w, M....rw \?, ;ww...?...w,u,, .t u..",.w.e..,.a.•;°`.t..t.., ? -r. "... .., ? r2. «n,nrw c........,.u. ..:t.:i:w=e:.?a•Mi c•?a w ..:..a. . ...:, .., •. w.\.,N,.-M,qw»-.,.ea.un. tr.,. I J = 'S =,s ? ti, :`.?,. «.; ?•-ti.w`?.. tt.•. Vim,>. v w" sir,....., .....t w-,.•t• >N...a...w ., .r ....i. tw:. t :...,u::,....i.."'w,::.,? a:?' t,.. -Tr ;?-..t"'W =.v-w? ,, ?t?.'?+•.... tom.. •?--i+•tit?rM r ?' ..?:. •r .,..." taw . :?' :°•s w: t.?.`?` ?tn.?'°w?`"n,w a'.`..' .?r• I• ,.. f r? ?ff _ r aH11?u.,ttTM .w... w"•w•1e\.•s:w i+•.»I?. q"+. ? ..-- ,. :• ua•en?1,74.l".?i:,n. .. ,r, .n.a 't'•°.•., \\,? .s..aip. ,•+a`w"tn?.w.wr I? ?,'. t?? ? ''• ` ?'r ?.IL?;-- r-' •'pe` • 1?'M" ?t ? . ? t` ?C l- //} J/ ?? ? ?.ti ? y'k"??,?.?"?,,? to i ar .? 1 - .__Qd.4l-•'-_r-1...?N'; [(?lt _.._LL ud?l_'s.^•?^?l?jw j ri•??} •`; z y IL st -f\.r -snfn G. 1 la-cn•?.•. (? ,;".-*_. .....;?sue ?? ( Al - 47 -J, '