FLD2011-02007; 1375 FT HARRISON AVE S; CAPITAL RESOURCES OF CHICAGO INC..r
FLD2011-02007
1375 S FT HARRISON AVE
Date Received: 2/1/20111:01:43 PM
Capital Resources of Chicago Inc.
ZONING DISTRICT: Industrial Research
and Technology
LAND USE:
ATLAS PAGE: 305B
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: May 17, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-02007
Agenda Item: E.3.
Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Property Investments, LLC
Address: 1375 S Ft. Harrison and 509 D Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for 18,921 square feet of
wholesale/distribution/warehouse facility use and 6,745 square feet of
office use in the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
with a lot area of 62,662 square feet, a lot width of 390 feet (along E
Street), a lot width of 279 feet (along the Pinellas Trail), a lot width
of 90 feet (along D Street), a lot width of 122 feet (along Hamlet
Avenue), a front (south) setback of four feet (to existing pavement)
and 39.3 feet (to existing building), a front (west) setback of zero feet
(to existing pavement) and 22 feet (to existing building), a front
(north) setback of five feet (to existing pavement) and 44 feet (to
existing building), a front (east) setback of zero feet (to existing
pavement) and 21 feet (to existing building), a building height of 32
feet (to top of tower), and 53 parking spaces as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-1304.C as well as a reduction to the
perimeter landscape requirement on the south from 10 feet to four
feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape requirement on the west
from 10 feet to zero feet a reduction to the perimeter landscape
requirement on the north from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the
perimeter landscape requirement on the east from 10 feet to zero feet
and reductions to both the south and north foundation landscape
requirements from five feet to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive
Landscape Program under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
ZONING DISTRICT: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Industrial Limited (IL)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant
Proposed: Wholesale/Distribution/Warehouse and Office
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 -Page 1
EXISTING North: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
SURROUNDING Warehouse and Office
ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential
(MDR) District
Offices and Detached Dwellings
East: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
Medical Clinic and Office
West: Outside of City Limits - Town of Belleair
Outdoor Recreation and Entertainment
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.44 acre subject property is located on the north side of E Street between S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue and Hamlet Avenue and on the south side of D Street. The property comprises three
separate parcels and has four front property lines and the remaining side and rear property lines
traverse vehicular cross access areas. The property contains two structures, one addressed off of
S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and the other addressed off of D Street. A 3,578 square foot building
(formerly Segway of Tampa Bay) exists on D Street and a 21,650 square foot building (formerly
a distribution use) presently exists on S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, as well as its associated off-street
parking. The site shares an ingress/egress area to both D Street and Hamlet Avenue with the
parcel located east of the D Street structure. The site also has ingress/egress areas along E Street.
West of the site, across S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, is the Belleair Country Club Golf Course and
east of the site, across Hamlet Avenue, is a medical clinic and office. South of the site, across E
Street, are detached dwellings and an office. Directly north of the site, across D Street, is an
office.
Development Proposal:
Previously the Development Review Committee (DRC) approved case FLS2006-09058 for retail
sales and service use (Segway of Tampa Bay) for the 509 D Street structure. This proposal is to
allow a warehouse use in the 509 D Street structure along with an office and warehouse use in
the S. Ft. Harrison structure. No changes are proposed for the D Street structure while the S. Ft.
Harrison structure has proposed to add approximately 800 square feet of floor area, mainly for an
elevator and entryway, and completely remodel the exterior facade to provide for a visually
interesting and attractive appearance. The existing structures all meet the required structural
setbacks. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 6-102.E, if the use of a
nonconforming structure is abandoned for a period of six consecutive months, the future use of
the structure shall be brought into full compliance with all the requirements of the Development
Code; thus the filing of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application.
Regarding the site, paved areas will be removed along with parking along E Street. The parking
lot will be resealed and restriped and handicap access routes are proposed to comply with ADA
requirements. Additional interior landscape islands are proposed along with enhanced buffers.
The existing parking lot will remain with setbacks to pavement as follows: a front (south)
setback of four feet, a front (west) setback of zero feet, a front (north) setback of five feet, a front
(east) setback of zero feet, the remaining setbacks are to vehicular cross access - a side (east)
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 2
setback of zero feet, a side (north) setback of zero feet and a rear (east) setback of zero feet. The
development proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the CDC is
discussed below.
Intensity: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-1301.1, the maximum
allowable intensity is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.65 for Industrial Limited (IL). The proposal
is in compliance with the above as it has a FAR of 0.36.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
1301.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.85 for IL. The overall proposed ISR is 0.38, which is
consistent with the above.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for both offices and wholesale, distribution and
warehouse is 10,000 square feet. The subject property is 62,662 square feet (1.44 acres). Also
for comparative purposes, the minimum lot width requirement for both offices and wholesale,
distribution and warehouse is 100 feet. The lot width along E Street is 390 feet, along Pinellas
Trail it is 279 feet, along Hamlet Avenue it is 122 feet and along D Street it is 90 feet. The
reduced lot width along D Street will not impede the normal and orderly development of
surrounding properties.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum setback requirements
for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum front setback requirement for both offices and wholesale, distribution and warehouse
is 20 feet and the side and rear setback for both offices and wholesale, distribution and
warehouse is 15 feet.
With regard to the existing building, the minimum required setbacks are all being met. Flexibility
has been requested with regard to the setbacks to the existing off-street parking and vehicular use
areas. The request includes a front (south) setback of four feet, a front (west) setback of zero
feet, a front (north) setback of five feet, a front (east) setback of zero feet, the remaining setbacks
are to vehicular cross access - a side (east) setback of zero feet, a side (north) setback of zero feet
and a rear (east) setback of zero feet. The setbacks to pavement along vehicular cross accesses
are permissible pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.A. While some pavement and parking is
proposed to be removed the front (south) setback of four feet, the front (west) setback of zero
feet, the front (north) of five feet and the front (east) setback of zero feet are to existing parking
spaces where there is no opportunity to remove pavement without impacting aisle widths or
number of parking spaces. Overall, the setbacks to pavement as requested are acceptable to Staff.
Maximum Building Heim Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there is no maximum allowable
height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison,
the maximum building height for offices is 30 feet and for wholesale, distribution and warehouse
is 50 feet. The proposed building height is 32 feet (to top of tower). The tower is the elevator
shaft which is permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than maximum height for the zoning
district. As the office height is 30 feet the maximum height of the elevator tower could be 46
feet. The remainder of the structure is 23 feet to the top of the parapet. The proposed elevator
tower height and top of parapet are within the above Code provisions.
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 3
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, the minimum required parking for
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development
Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The off-street parking
requirement for office is 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, which for 6,745
square feet of office floor area results in a requirement of 20 spaces and for warehouse the
requirement is 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, which for 18,921 square feet
of warehouse results in a requirement of 28 spaces. This results in a requirement of 48 total
parking spaces. The site currently has 60 spac es; however after placement of new interior
landscape islands and removal of parking along E street the site proposes 53 parking spaces,
which is meets the above Code requirements.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles.
Solid Waste: The proposal includes the provision of a solid waste refuse container located on the
north side of the Ft. Harrison building. It will be screened with a six foot high masonry wall
painted to match the building. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid
Waste Department.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utilities including individual distribution lines must
be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and
communication lines for this development will be installed underground on site in compliance
with this requirement. All electric panels, boxes and meters will be painted the same color as the
building.
Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 10-foot wide landscape
buffer along the Pinellas Trail, D Street, Hamlet Avenue and E Street. The other property lines
abut vehicular cross accesses and parking, therefore no buffer is required. The proposed buffer
along the Pinellas Trail ranges from 30 feet to zero feet wide with the majority of it meeting the
10-foot wide requirement. A small portion, approximately 15 feet in length, does not meet the
requirement. Similarly, the buffer along E Street ranges from 30 feet to four feet. The buffer is
proposed along E Street as parking spaces have been removed which fronted directly on E Street.
Regarding the Hamlet Avenue landscape buffer the majority of it is over 30 feet wide with the
only area being reduced to zero is for a concrete drive running parallel to Hamlet Avenue. The
existing buffer width along D Street is five feet wide and there is no opportunity to remove
parking spaces in this area. The proposed buffers include sabal palms and crape myrtle trees
along with Indian hawthorne, holly, liriope, cordgrass and viburnum.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a
building fagade with frontage along a street right-of-way. The foundation plantings must be
within an area that is a minimum of five feet wide and consist of at least two accent trees or three
palm trees for every 40 linear feet of building fagade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of
required landscape area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the
remainder to be ground cover. The existing building has frontage along three street rights-of-
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 4
way. The fagade along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ranges from an eight foot to 13 foot wide area
with the required plantings; however the E Street fagade and D Street fagade do not have
foundation plantings along the entire fagade and there is no opportunity to provide them.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the gross vehicular use area shall be
provided as landscape islands a minimum of eight feet wide and 150 square feet in size. The site
proposes 12.9 percent of the vehicular use areas to be landscape islands.
To mitigate for the lack of foundation plantings on two facades and inadequate perimeter
landscape buffer widths, the applicant has proposed to increase the buffer width along the
Pinellas Trail in most areas from 10 feet to 30 feet, increase the buffer width along Hamlet
Avenue from 10 feet to 30 feet in most areas and increase the interior landscape requirements
from 10 percent to 12.9 percent. Due to existing site constraints staff supports the requested
landscape reductions.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
1. Architectural theme:
Consistent I Inconsistent
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of N/A N/A
the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel
proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed X
in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than
landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the
minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape x
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor
plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the
parcel proposed for development is located.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subject property.
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 5
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-1301.1 and 2-1304:
Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.65 (IL) 0.36 X
ISR 0.85 (IL) 0.38 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 62,662 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width N/A E Street 390 feet X
Pinellas Trail 279 feet X
D Street 97 feet X
Hamlet Avenue 122 feet X
Maximum Height N/A 32 feet (to top of elevator tower) X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A E Street: 39.3 feet (to building) X1
4 feet (to pavement)
Pinellas Trail: 22 feet (to building) X'
0 feet (to pavement)
D Street: 44 feet (to building) X'
5 feet (to pavement)
Hamlet Ave: 21 feet (to building) X'
0 feet (to pavement)
Minimum Off-Street Parking 3 / 1,000 SF GFA 53 parking spaces X
(office)
1.511,000 SF GFA
(warehouse)
48 arkin spaces)
I See analysis in Staff Report.
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 6
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
1304.C. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and aonrooriate distances between buildines.
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 7
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of March 3, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 1.44 acre subject property is located on the north side of E Street between S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue and Hamlet Avenue and on the south side of D Street;
2. That the subject property is located within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT)
District and the Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The proposal includes a setback reductions to the existing buildings on all four front property
lines;
4. The proposal includes setback reductions to existing pavement from all four front property
lines;
5. The proposal includes reductions to the perimeter landscape buffer requirements on all four
front property boundaries;
6. The proposal includes reductions to the foundation landscape planting requirements;
7. The proposal includes 53 parking spaces;
8. The proposal includes a building height of 32 feet to top of elevator tower; and
9. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-1301.1. and
2-1304 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
1304.C of the Community Development Code;
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 8
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. The development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 3-1202.G
of Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development approval for 18,921 square feet of wholesale/distribution/warehouse
facility use and 6,745 square feet of office use in the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT)
District with a lot area of 62,662 square feet, a lot width of 390 feet (along E Street), a lot width
of 279 feet (along the Pinellas Trail), a lot width of 90 feet (along D Street), a lot width of 122
feet (along Hamlet Avenue), a front (south) setback of four feet (to existing pavement) and 39.3
feet (to existing building), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 22 feet
(to existing building), a front (north) setback of five feet (to existing pavement) and 44 feet (to
existing building), a front (east) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 21 feet (to
existing building), a building height of 32 feet (to top of tower), and 53 parking spaces as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 2-1304.C as well as a reduction to the perimeter landscape requirement on the
south from 10 feet to four feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape requirement on the west
from 10 feet to zero feet a reduction to the perimeter landscape requirement on the north from 10
feet to five feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape requirement on the east from 10 feet to
zero feet and reductions to both the south and north foundation landscape requirements from
five feet to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the site drainage and the system of ponds
and under drainage will be reviewed by a Florida Registered Professional engineer and the
results will be implemented in the construction documents as required and signed and sealed;
2. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot improvements, landscaping and
building improvements;
3. That, prior to issuance of any building permits, the landscape plant list be revised to indicate
the minimum size requirements;
4. That, all proposed signage be permitted separately;
5. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, a unity of title be submitted for parcels
21-29-15-06462-016-0050, 21-29-15-06462-016-0060 and 21-29-15-06462-016-0080;
6. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion or business tax receipt, whichever
occurs first, all of the proposed landscaping shall be installed; and
7. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the
buildings be painted the same color as the building.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-02007 - Page 9
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4553
scott.kurleman(a) myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, assist public customers at the Zoning Counter, the organization of data and
its display in order to track information and provide status reports and making presentations to
various City Boards and Committees.
Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports. Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign
Permits, Business Tax Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program
Applications.
Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City
land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure
that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition
in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy
Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the
installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring
that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for
structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private
properties.
Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. Groveland, Florida June 1993 to June 1996
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private
corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding
arboricultural techniques related to trees.
Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company, Clearwater, Florida June 1991 to June 1993
Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance.
Store Manager
William Natorp Company, Inc. Cincinnati Ohio June 1983 to June 1991
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams
of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance,
workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor
products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
GRADUATE- Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA,
TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA.
Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management
AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414
LEED Green Associate, Currently pursuing
MOTIVATIONAL Mentor Award, December 2010
tt
JEFFORDS ST
Lij
C ? F-7¢ } Z z
Z ?- GRAND CENTRAL LU ? Z
JC?lc,ER- } PINELLAS
LLI
a
?
•
i
-
5
•'. •
_
i •' •'•
'i
0
r
"' '::fir - - ? } ?? ?- ? El
`N
M TUSKAWILLA ST r?kawina
Lij
El?
- D
_
C/ W
ST
_ cr
O
- PROJECT ::;, q00
LAKEVI E W to?
SITE SOiJ
3
' Sr
- o
: :•:::' ': E ST
fr? ,'• ':i .::;".'.}7;':.::' ' KIN
. .:R •:-::--' E';" ''.:':''-•: :=;.r.." i•:':C'-•:::'t ". 1 ':,E ?L `: ?-•::: :i•.': 41cLENNAN ST N
- ? q
m
iIFS/fEW1:?:.;;,.:::•i:i::::_;:.:?2 BLVD
WAY :E
?I
g2.
vroODLAWN ST
3
- z
W u W LJ LU `'l
> HOWARD
.
,
?
•
?
•
r
•
,
'
*
,'E:::: ;:=: •:.::. - BRYANT
iS' ?d.?f
:
•:
:;?
••'::
:
?
::
-`: •
:'::'
: •?..
a
LOCATION MAP
Owner: Clearwater Property Investments LLC Case: FLD201 1-02007
Site: 1375 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.44 Acres
PIN: 21-29-15-06462-016-0050 Atlas Page: 305B
21-29-15-06462-016-0060
21-29-15-06462-016-0080
b
O b
- 1335 b ``a 2
= 1330 &U
'
a
h N
u) ?
CST LAKEVIEW RD
?
l? 1345 u
i o 0 o n o b
1346 Q o
= 1340
1351
1352 v)
- 1354
e 1359
- 1356 R T
- - - 13
? h h h h h? h ?
1 5 1365
6
1375
1399
C. N Q b
- - - -_-
-- --- - h n
h h h uNi 1406 W 1407 605 0 N
1
b u b 6216
- - - 1409
1409
- - 1415 71,70 1QAl
- - 1417 ?kA6
A
60 620
- 1423 h h h N
-
-
-
- i
b
M ENNAN ST MCLENNAN ST
- - -- 1425 h h
- - - - b 0 c0 b N
- - - - 1429 36 b
4b
- 1439
1429 1/2
ZONING MAP
Owner: Clearwater Property Investments LLC Case: FLD201 1-02007
Site: 1375 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.44 Acres
PIN: 21-29-15-06462-016-0050 Atlas Page: 3058
21-29-15-06462-016-0060
21-29-15-06462-016-0080
'• 1Y::
3 4 99 11 ?. 1%I
y
155
m
9 I
r
I_ -
r o:
9031 m
>
1
a a33A
1 ti
2
4. 0
`
0
-
• C
5
•
• y
n h Z 2
1
1
1
9
- "'
709 155 118.9 378.4
CST LAKEV/EW RD
LAKEVIEW
100 X15,
90 1260 00 1
1? l+= ? P?Y1? a? j1
°
- a+
l ??
- -
n
r
m,o
1343 e
85 I a
- 04162
134§1
q
? 8 3 2
4a
3
1195(6) I W
135
V
10
5? W
4
9.35 10
Q o
X339 ICES g
5 1056 yn 1 I I 1 I ?I? az(s)? _
90
-1 - L - - . l0
296 or b
%19 p 1 STREET
_ O Jr
nh n hill a 11Nnvi
1-
?r
y
-
or c
N
OR RECREATION
WAREHOUSING 51 1 1 3\ f
B 1 1-
a I
OUTDO s 1
3
6 s OFFICES
- 1
1
9 s _..1- 9 I2
- - 1 1300 ' ... Q 1 252(5)
i
1
?5
1
- 10 112 13 14 1 15
16 1 17 2 ?
•
1
13
- -I I I MEDICAL CLINIC I
I g
I
1
- 97.7 120(6)1
E S`1fftEET EST
STREET
-- - - -- - - - 112 50 50 50 60 1 190 57.7 57.7 50 52 52
1140 1407 8? °t
8218 1
OFFICES DE•r:,.cFIED 2
T
4
15 14 3 4 5
DWELLINGS 1409
50
15 13 50.2 115.4 X14 s
.
2
LLJ 14
15 4 P
' ?4? W 7 (6)
- - - - - - 2
12
12
\
13 °a o
z 7 8 9 11
' 7 Q a1y 9
10
8 7
1917 p 12 1166,
1
1
3
Q _ o I ?
y
1o m
N
--- ?.,
N N i 0 N
1{23
'?
?
- - - 50 h so
99 s8% I \
zz
72 52 104 91(s)
_ MC CLENNAN STREET
- - - p14151 110010 50 80 N a* 70 50- 101 50 44.1
h
N
- y y 01 m m ;I 10
N
1429
A
F 5 C
17
- m
6
1 3
142
91/2
I
N
- _
.
4
as ? 16
20 1 19 18 1 15 .,y 2 \ `?? 5 7
6 g y
- -- -- -- - 3 3s \
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: Clearwater Property Investments LLC Case: FLD201 1-02007
Site: 1375 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.44 Acres
PIN: 21-29-15-06462-016-0050 Atlas Page: 3056
21-29-15-06462-016-0060
21-29-15-06462-016-0080
1375 S Ft. Harrison Ave/ 509 D Street
FLD2011-02007
Page 1 of 1
East side of 1375 S. Ft. Harrison structure facing Hamlet
Avenue
North side of 1375 S. Ft. Harrison structure.
Front (west) facing the Pinellas Trail.
West side of D Street structure.
D Street structure and 1375 S. Ft Harrison structure along
Pinellas Trail.
Front (north) side of D Street structure.
January 2, 2011
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Flexible Development Application
Comprehensive Infill
1375 S Ft. Harrison- 509 D Street
To whom it may concern,
The following letter is a request for approval of the attached application for the project at the above
referenced addresses.
This project is the remodeling of the subject site involving the main building located at 1375 S Ft.
Harrison and the associated site. The building located at 509 D Street is to remain as is.
This parcel is bound on the north by D Street and one neighboring one story building (Industrial)
To the East is Hamilet Ave., the South is E Street and to the West is S Ft. Harrison and the Pinellas
County Trail cutting across the property.
This application would require the following request to be granted.
1. To allow the reduction in the required set backs for paving from the property lines are
as follows:
The front (West) is based off of the Pinellas County Trail ROW as well as S Ft. Harrison,
the existing paving varies from 12' to 1.5'. The existing drive in front of the building will
be removed. The resulting parking lot will still have a space that is 1.5' from the Trail
ROW. The other area of parking behind the building would vary from 5' to 13'.
Code requires 20'
Thus a wavier of 18.5'.
The (North) D Street existing is 5', that will remain;
Code requires 20'
Thus a wavier of 15'
The (South) E Street is 1', it will be increased to minimum 5',
Code requires 20'
Thus a wavier of 15'
630 Chestnut Street ( Clearwater, Florida 33756 Tel: 727.796.8774 Fax: 727.791.6942 www.designititc.com
FLS Comp Infill
1375 S Ft. Harrison
1.2.2011
Pg 2
The (East) Hamilet Ave.existing is 1', it will remain
Code requires 20'
Thus a wavier of 19'
The storm water narrative as requested in Section E of the application is as follows: This property has an
existing storm retention system with out fall to the City's storm water system. This system will be
refurbished in to a working system as require. The development of the site as proposed has reduced the
Impervious Surface Area, thus reducing the amount of water that has to be handled by the pond system.
All work shall comply with the City of Clearwater's Standard Engineering details as may apply.
We believe that approval of this request will allow this property to be remodeled and be an example of
the business owner and the City working in cooperation for the betterment of both.
We look forward to your approval and appreciate your support in seeing this redevelopment become
reality.
r Sincerely,
Robert E. Gregg
630 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Tel: 727.796.8774 Fax: 727.791.6942 www.designittic.com
'`Clearwater
Planning & Development
Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
Capital Resources of Chicago Inc.
PO Box 2256, Clearwater FL 33756
727.441.3474 FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
Capital Resources of Chicago Inc.
Robert E. Gregg
630 Chestnut Street, Clearwater F133756
727.796.8774 ext 331 FAX NUMBER:
727.644.8193 EMAIL:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 05.04.2010)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
727.791.6942
archre2 a,aol.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME:
STREET ADDRESS
PARCEL NUMBER(S):
PARCEL SIZE (acres):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
1375 Ft. Harrison
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
PROJECT VALUATION: $ 150,000.00
1375 S Ft. Harrison Ave, 509 D Sreet
21-29-15-06462-016-0080, 0050, 0060
1.44 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 62,662
See attached Property praiser General Information forms
PROPOSED USE(S): Warehouse, ancillary Office
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Reduction of the required set backs on all four sides of the
Specifically identify the request See attached letter.
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\1375 S Ft Harrison Ave\Comprehensive_lnfill_Project_(FLD)_1211.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
jEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO -x_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
The property was developed in 1978 as an industrial research facility with corporate offices. The building will be remodeled and the exterior
.
...
....................
.
.
..............................................................................
Will be redone as well. This will not change the scale nor density of the building. The site will be redesigned reducing the paved areas and
The parking along E street. The added landscaping will enhance the presence in the neighborhood and soften the scale of the building.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................--..............................................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The redevelopment of this property will only be a positive influence in an area where most of the buildings were built in the mid 1970's.
.................. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . ........... . ................ . . . . ................... . ......................... . ..................................... .... .. .......... .. .. ................... . ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . ........................ . ......................... . .....................
This project may be a catalyst for other properties to do the same. Thus the potential value of the adjacent properties may see a gain as
Redevelopment may spread along Ft. Harrison and the adjacent streets.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The redevelopment of this property will eliminate a property that has be vandalized and left in disrepair for the past several years.
....... ..................................................................... .................................................................................................................. .. ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...
...................
.
The occupation and redevelopment of this property will eliminate a possible haven for vandals and vagrants and non maintained property.
Thus increasing the potential safety of the neighborhood.
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................... ..
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The redevelopment of the property includes removing a driveway that is at the corner of Ft. Harrison and E Street, we will also close a
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
parking drive access from Hamilet Ave. We are proposing additional curb cuts along E Street with limited parking which will help keep
Traffic off of Hamilet, and use D and E streets as main access to Ft. Harrison.
.................... . ......................... ... .. ....... .... .. ... ........................................................................................................................................................................................... .. ......................................................................................................................................................................... .. ..........................................................................
.......................
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
This redevelopment project is consistent with the overall character of the area. The changes in the building and the site development will
. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... ..... ................. . . . . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. --- ............................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................... . . . ................. ...... ................... ....... ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . ...... ..........
be an improvement which will enhance the character of the neighborhood.
. - - - - - ------- --------
. ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . . . . . . . . . . ............. . . . . . . . ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................................. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... .................... . . . . . . . .......... . .......................
... .......................... .......... ........................................................... .... ........... ..
....
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
The adjacent properties are office and industrial in use. The remodeling of this property will be primarily office with a warehouse facility.
.............................................. ............................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . ....................................................... . ................................... . . . . . . . . . . . ...................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... .................................... . ..............................
The redevelopment of the site will offer a more pleasing street presence. The hours of operation are typically from 8:00am to 5:00pm..
The business is a drastic drop in number of employees compared to the prior use aswell.
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\1375 S Ft Harrison Ave\Comprehensive_lnfill_Project_(FLD)_1211.doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
? Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
The redevelopment of this property will try to bring this property into code compliance as reasonable as possible without decreasing the
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.
.
...
............................
...............................................................
.....
......
.
original use as developed in 1978. We will be addressing the set backs as the primary issue of non compliance, with out a reduction in the
.............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................... . .....................................
.
.
...... . . . . . . .
................
.
.............................................................................. .
required set backs we would have to reduce the size of the existing building and the related parking thus diminishing the property value.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................................ ... .. ... ........ . ............................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........................................
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
This was developed in 1978 with the blessing of the City. Since this property has not been occupied for the last six months we have to try
.................. ..................._._................................................................................................................................._.............................................................._...................__........_......_.....__.._............__......................................_...__........_._........
.
.
.
.
...........
.........
.....
.
.
and comply with the applicable regulations that now exist. We will be asking for relief with regard to some of the requirements that effect us
..........
..................... ._._...__....._.............................................. .................. ............................... ......... ...... .............. .._.......... ................... .......................... ._...__......_............... ....... ............ .............................. .......... ..._...._._._.... ............................................................ .......................
with the ability to comply with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
............._........................................................................................_............_......._._.........._........_.__..._........__................................._.._.........._.._........._...._._............................................................_............._..................................................._.._._..__..............._..._....._.........
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The redevelopment of this property will not impede the adjacent properties with regard to their potential use or redevelopment. The
Improvement of this property could be a positive influence on the adjacent preoperties,
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
The adjacent properties may decide to remodel their properties as well, thus we may be a catalyst along that section of Ft. Harrison.
................................................... ..... .... ._.._.................................. _._..---..... _..._....................... ................................ .................. ........_................. ..................... .._............................ ...................... .................. _........ .._............................................. ....... ..................... .__.................... ................. .... .
................
................... ..................... ---- ......................................... _...................... ........................ _......................................................................................... _............................................................................................_.__............................................................. ...................................... _.............
5. ................................................................................................................... ............................................_......_......................................._..........._..._............_........._........._........._..._....................................................................................................................................
The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
This properties use is in compliance with the Industrial Land Use and the IRT Zoning District. The redevelopment of the building and the
.......... ................................. _._............................................................. ................................................ ..............__._.......... ...................................................... ---- ......_........ __..... __....__.... ..... .._.......... _........................_................. _........... _....................... ................................................................................ .............................
.........
site if approved will bring the set backs and the landscaping within reasonable compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
6. . ....... .. ... . .............................................................................................................................................................................. ... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................... ..... .
Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
We will be adding an elevator which will become an element on the face of the building using stone and a _
sloped roof. We will be redesigning the opening in the building facades and adding projected awnings. The building will be resurfaced
using a varlet of textures and materials to enhance the street view.
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\1375 S Ft Harrison Ave\Comprehensive_lnfill_Project_(FLD)_1211.doc
Page 3 of 8
,E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. The existing collection system will be refurbished
as required. We are also reducing the impervious area
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
--
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees;
? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards lie. Reduce number of
spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community
Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be
used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved;
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\City of Clearwater forms\Compre hens ive_lnfill_Project (FLD)_5.2010.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
............:.....
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
..........
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
..................
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
.............
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
..................
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
...................
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
..................
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
...................
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
EXISTING
62,662 / 1,44
. . . . . . . . . . . . .....................................
NA
NA
59
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.............................. . .............
27,082 (43.2%)
REQUIRED PROPOSED
20,000 62,662 / 1,44
.................................................................. .......................................................
NA NA
NA NA
49 53
28,969 (46.2%) 85% max
.............................................. .........................................
23,653 (37.8 %) 65% max
? REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'% X 11);
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
........
..........
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
...................
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
........- - _.
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
22,296 (30.0%)
32'
24,114 (38.4%0)
................................ . . . . ............
. . . . . . . . .
25,666 (40.9%)
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\1375 S Ft Harrison Ave\Comprehensive_lnfill_Project_(FLD)_1211.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
Q LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
.....- ....- .
Names of abutting streets;
...................
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
...................
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
..................
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information:
All sides of all buildings
Dimensioned
...................
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/z X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8'%X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\City of Clearwater forms\Comprehensive-Infiil_Project_(FLD)_5.2010.doc
Page 6 of 8
X. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
¦ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
-r
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150%a of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
? Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included.
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this _3 day of
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and January A.D. 20_11 to me
photograph the property described in this application. and/or by _Robert E. Gregg who
is personally known has produced
as
identif tion.
Not ry pu lic NUT Y PUBLIC -STATE OFFLOIUUDDA
Signature of property owne r entative My commis i n expires: ?} Lynn A. Matthews
1 ASk-p?M1? =Commission #DD717600
vxptres: OCT. 'ZTSTT
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\City of Clearwater forms\Comprehensive_Infill_ProjaLD)e520fEX.`mUqGCO.,INC.
Page 7 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
Gary R Boesch Patricia Mavarkis
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1375 S Ft. Harrison - 509 D Street
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Reduction in the required set backs
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Robert E. Gregg
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (1/we), the and
Gary R Boesch
ng is true and correct,
Property Owner
. . . ............................. . ............................ ........ ................. .......... .................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ...... ...... ................ ..
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 3 _ day of
January 2011 personally appeared Robert E. Gregg who having been first duly sworn
...
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public Signatu e
Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires:__
i',OTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF FLORIDA
Lynn A. Matthews
Commission #DD717600
•.,, ,,.,` Expires: OCT. 13, 2011
BONDED TIIRU NmAN T. BONDING CO., INC.
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\My Documents\1375 S Ft Harrison Ave\Comprehensive_Infill_Project_(FLD)_1211.doc
Page 8 of 8
www.sunbiz.org - Department of State
Home Contact Us E-Filing Services
Previous on List Next on List Return To List
Events No Name History
Detail by Entity Name
Florida Profit Corporation
CAPITAL RESOURCES OF CHICAGO, INC.
Filina Information
Document Number S06089
FEI/EIN Number 593033302
Date Filed 10/11/1990
State FL
Status ACTIVE
Last Event CORPORATE MERGER
Event Date Filed 05/16/1997
Event Effective Date NONE
Principal Address
611 DRUID ROAD E
SUITE 401
CLEARWATER FL 33756
Changed 03/24/2009
Mailing Address
PO BOX 2256
CLEARWATER FL 33757
Changed 01/12/2010
Registered Agent Name & Address
MAVRAKIS, PATRICIA
611 DRUID ROAD E
SUITE 401
CLEARWATER FL 33756
Name Changed: 11/07/2008
Address Changed: 03/24/2009
Officer/Director Detail
Name & Address
Title PD
BOESCH, GARY R
611 DRUID RD E STE 401
CLEARWATER FL 33756 US
Annual Resorts
Report Year Filed Date
Document Searches
Page 1 of 2
? t I
u
Forms Help
Entity Name Search
Submit
http://ccfcorp.dos.state.fl.us/scriptslcordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc_number=S06089... 1/3/2011
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 1 of 5
Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question/Comment about this
ap rcel x Query Results Search Page page
21-29-15-06462-016-0080
Portability Data Current as of December 28, Radius Improvement Value
Calculator 2010 Print Search per F.S. 553.844
[1:03 pm Friday December 31 ]
Ownership/Mailing
Address Site Address (First Building)
CAPITAL 1375 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER 33756
RESOURCES OF _
CHICAGO INC
PO BOX 2256 Jump to building:
CLEARWATER FL (1) 1375 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER 33756-
33756
f
Prope Use: 1730 (General Office - Non-Professional One Story (advertising, Living Units:
travel & employment agencies, pest contro) 0
[click here to hide] 2010 Legal Description
BELLEAIR BLK 16, THAT PT OF LOTS 7 THRU 11 E OF PINELLAS TRAIL & THAT PT OF
W 30FT OF LOT 8 W OF TRAIL & THAT PT OF LOT 9 W OF TRAIL & ALL OF LOTS 12
THRU 17 & ALL OF VAC 18FT ALLEY W OF LOT 12 & W 1/2 OF VAC 18FT ALLEY W OF
LOT 6
2010 Exemptions
Homestead: No Save-Our-Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Non-Homestead 10% Cap: Yes
Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0
I 2010 Parcel Information 2010 Orieinal Trim Notice
Most Recent Conveyance Sales Comparison Census Tract Evacuation Zone Plat Book/Page
17066/0157 Sales Query 11210302580011 NON EVAC 01-11/105
2010 Value Information as corrected
Year Save-Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ County SchTaxaooblle Municipal
Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Value Taxable Value
2010 No $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
[click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file)
Save-Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal
Year
Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value
2010 No $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 N/A $400,000
2009 No $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 N/A $800,000
2008 No $870,000 $870,000 $870,000 $870,000 $870,000
2007 No $866,000 $866,000 $866,000 N/A $866,000
2006 No $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 N/A $850,000
2005 No $830,000 $830,000 $830,000 N/A $830,000
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160080 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 2 of 5
2004 No $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 N/A $800,000
2003 No $705,000 $705,000 $705,000 N/A $705,000
2002 No $675,200 $675,200 $675,200 N/A $675,200
2001 No $549,400 $549,400 $549,400 N/A $549,400
2000 No $516,400 $516,400 $516,400 N/A $516,400
1999 No $517,200 $517,200 $517,200 N/A $517,200
1998 No $517,000 $517,000 $517,000 N/A $517,000
1997 No $516,800 $516,800 $516,800 N/A $516,800
1996 No $516,100 $516,100 $516,100 N/A $516,100
2010 Tax Information
Click Here for 2010 Tax Bill Tax District: CW
2010 Final Millage Rate 20.9523
2010 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $8,380.92
Exemptions
A significant change in taxable value may occur
when sold due to changes in the market or the
removal of exemptions. Click here for more
information.
2010 Land Information
Seawall: No Frontage: None
Ranked Sales See all transactions
Sale Date Book/Page Price /U V/I
21 Oct
2010 17066/
01570 $425,000 M I
23 Apr
2004 13522/
1770 0 $970,000 U 1
24 Sep 12237/
M $1,200,000 U 1
2002 1651
01 Feb 11818/
O $803,100 U 1
2002 0177
1977 04580/ $17
200 U
0922 0 ,
1969 03180/ $31
700 U
0131 0 ,
View:
Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method
Off Bldg 1 Story (17) 0x0 5.00 50782.0000 SF
[click here to hide] 2010 Building 1 Structural Elements Back to Top
Site Address: 1375 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER 33756-
Quality: Average
Square Footage:
5032.00
Foundation:
Continuous Footing
Floor System: Slab
On Grade
Exterior Wall:
Concrete
Blk/Stucco
Roof Frame: Bar
Joint/Rigid Frame
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160080 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Roof Cover: Blt Up
Metal/Gypsum
Stories: 2
Living units: 0
Floor Finish: Carpet
Combination
Interior Finish: Dry
Wall
Fixtures: 8
Year Built: 1979
Effective Age: 28
Cooling: Heat &
Cooling Pkg
Other Depreciation:
40%
Page 3 of 5
No Building Drawing
Available
Building 1 Sub Area Information
Description Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2
Base 4,682 4,682 1.00 4,682
Open Porch 0 350 0.30 105
Total Building finished SF: 4,682 Total Gross SF: 5,032 Total Effective SF: 4,787
[click here to hide] 2010 Building 2 Structural Elements Back to Top
Site Address:
Quality: Average
Square Footage:
15051.00
Foundation:
Spread/Mono
Footing
Floor System: Slab
On Grade
Exterior Wall:
Concrete Block
Roof Frame: Bar
Joint/Rigid Frame
Roof Cover: Blt Up
Metal/Gypsum
Stories: 0
Living units: 0
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160080 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Floor Finish: Vinyl
Asb Tile
Interior Finish: Dry
Wall
Fixtures: 8
Year Built: 1979
Effective Age: 23
Cooling: Heat &
Cooling Pkg
Other Depreciation:
40%
Page 4 of 5
No Building Drawing
Available
Building 2 Sub Area Information
Description Buildint? Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ftz Factor Effective Ft2
Base 11,775 11,775 1.00 11,775
Base Semi-finished 2,855 2,855 0.75 2,141
Canopy(only or loading 0 421 0.20 84
platform)
Total Building finished SF: 14,630 Total Gross SF: 15,051 Total Effective SF: 14,000
[click here to hide] 2010 Extra Features
Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year
ASPHALT $1.75 10,700.00 $18,725.00 $18,725.00 0
FIRESPRINK $2.00 4,692.00 $9,384.00 $4,317.00 1979
FIRESPRINK $2.00 14,630.00 $29,260.00 $13,460.00 1979
SHED $25.00 288.00 $7,200.00 $3,312.00 1979
[click here to hide] Permit Data
Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in
Meld reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting
office in which the structure is located.
Permit Number J1 Description 11 Issue Date j Estimated Value
No Permit Data Found
-- - - -
Radius (feet):
erials: 2009 Color Transparency:' 0.5 Update Map
1170
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160080 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 5 of 5
you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and
How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right-click on the map; Select "Copy SVG"; Open a
Word document; Select "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK
How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right-click on the map; Select "This Frame"; Select
"Open Frame in New Window"; Print from the new window.
+ ?!
Oft
1 R"
h ?
F 017,
'40
r
,
w
efj 4 Y i
f
I?X
Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question/Comment about this
ap reel ue Results Search Page pace
http://www.pepao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160080 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 1 of 3
interactive Man of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Q1lestionlComment about this
Parcel uerv Results Search Page page
21-29-15-06462-016-0050
Data Current as of December 28,
2010 Print Radius Improvement Value
[12:37 pm Friday December 31] Search per F.S. 553.844
Ownership/Mailing Address Site Address
CAPITAL RESOURCES OF
CHICAGO INC No site address found
PO BOX 2256
CLEARWATER FL 33756
Property Use: 4000 (Vacant Industrial Land)
[click here to hide] 2010 Legal Description
BELLEAIR BLK 16, W'LY 43FT OF LOT 5
2010 Exemptions
a
Living Units:
Homestead: No Save-Our-Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Non-Homestead 10% Cap: Yes
Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0
1 2010 Parcel Information 2010 Original Trim Notice
Most Recent Conveyance Sales. Comparison Census Tract Evacuation Zone Plat Book/Page
17066/0157 12103025800 NON EVAC OH1/105
2010 Value Information as corrected
Year Save-Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ Coup School Municipal
Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value
2010 No $21,930 $21,930 $21,930 $21,930 $21,930
[click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file)
Save-Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ Coun School m Municipal
Year Homes Cap
2010 No
2009 No
2008 No
2007 No
2006 No
2005 No
2004 No
2003 No
2002 No
2001 No
Value SOH Cap Taxable Value
$21,930 $21,930 $21,930
$26,316 $26,316 $26,316
$28,500 $28,500 $28,500
$29,600 $29,600 $29,600
$30,700 $30,700 $30,700
$21,900 $21,900 $21,900
$21,900 $21,900 $21,900
$17,500 $17,500 $17,500
$17,500 $17,500 $17,500
$17,500 $17,500 $17,500
axable
Value Taxable Value
-
N/A $21,930
N/A $26,316
$28,500 $28,500
N/A $29,600
N/A $30,700
N/A $21,900
N/A $21,900
N/A $17,500
N/A $17,500
N/A $17,500
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160050 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 2 of 3
2000 No $17,500 $17,500 $17,500 N/A $17,500
1999 No $17,500 $17,500 $17,500 NIA $17,500
1998 No $17,500 $17,500 $17,500 N/A $17,500
1997 No $17,500 $17,500 $17,500 N/A $17,500
1
1996 No $17,500 $17,500 $17,500 N/A $17,500
2010 Tax Information
Click Here for 2010 Tax Bill Tax District:
CW
2010 Final Millage Rate 20.9523
2010 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $459.48
Exemptions
A significant cisange in taxable value may occur
When sold € ue to changes to the market or the
removal of exemptions. Click here for more
information.
Ranked Sales See all transactions
Sale Date Book/Page Price QX V/1
21 Oct
2010 17066/
0157 93 $425,000 M V
23 Apr 13522/
1770 0 $970,000 U V
2004
24 Sep 12237/
651 $1,200,000 U V
2002 1
01 Feb 11818/
11 $803,100 U V
2002 0177
15 Nov 09525/ $700000 U V
1996 0690
WMA
'
2010 Land Information
Seawall: No Frontage: None View:
Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method
Vacant Industrial (40) 43x120 5.00 5160.0000 SF
[click here to hide] 2010 Extra Features
Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year
No Extra Features on Record
II [click here to hide] Permit Data II
Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in
field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting
office in which the structure is located.
Permit Number Jj Description Jj Issue Date Jl Estimated Value
No Permit Data Found
?1 -
adius (feet): -
d erials: 2009 Color Transparency. 0.5 Update Map
a
1360 1k
;e y:..., d>, ....P, q,..:.: ;sa.Ri,, ?:av ..?,•..? ,,:..:.... suv __ ..,..,-:. CIIC ere for information an
installation.
How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right-click on the map; Select "Copy SVG"; Open a
Word document; Select "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK
ow to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right-click on the map; Select "This Frame"; Select
"Open Frame in New Window"; Print from the new window.
bttp://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160050 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
M-azamm
4.
Page 3 of 3
Interactive Map of this Sales Baclc to-Query- New Tax Collector Horne Qaestion/Comment about this
parcel Query Results Search PA VC
wee
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160050 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information Page 1 of 4
Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question/Comment about this
pa rcel x Query Results Search Paee pace
21-29-15-06462-016-0060
Portability Data Current as of December 28, Radius Improvement Value
Calculator 2010 Print Search per F.S. 553.844
[ 1:04 pm Friday December 31 ]
Ownershi /Mailin Address Site Address
CAPITAL RESOURCES OF
CHICAGO INC 509 D ST CLEARWATER 33756-
PO BOX 2256
CLEARWATER FL 33756
Property Use: 4120 (Light Manufacturing, Small Equipment Mfg. Plant, Electronic, Living Units:
Small Machine Shop, Instrument Mfg., Pr) 0
[click here to hide] 2010 Legal Description
BELLEAIR BLK 16, LOT 6 & E 1/2 OF VAC 18FT ALLEY ON W
2010 Exemptions
Homestead: No Save-Our-Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Non-Homestead 10% Cap: Yes
Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0
2010 Parcel Information 2010 Original Trim Notice
Most Recent Conveyance Sales Comparison Census Tract Evacuation Zone Plat Book/Page
17066/0157 Sales ue 12103025800 NON EVAC OH1/105
2010 Value Information as corrected
Year Save-Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ Count School
y Municipal
Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value
2010 No $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000
[click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file)
Save-Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal
Year
Homes Cap Value SOH Co Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value
2010 No $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 N/A $110,000
2009 No $158,000 $158,000 $158,000 N/A $158,000
2008 No $205,000 $205,000 $205,000 $205,000 $205,000
2007 No $183,000 $183,000 $183,000 N/A $183,000
2006 No $190,000 $190,000 $190,000 N/A $190,000
2005 No $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 N/A $150,000
2004 No $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 N/A $150,000
2003 No $82,900 $82,900 $82,900 N/A $82,900
2002 No $77,100 $77,100 $77,100 N/A $77,100
2001 No $72,000 $72,000 $72,000 N/A $72,000
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160060 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 2 of 4
2000 No $72,000 $72,000 $72,000 N/A $72,000
1999 No $65,600 $65,600 $65,600 N/A $65,600
1998 No $63,500 $63,500 $63,500 N/A $63,500
1997 No $60,800 $60,800 $60,800 N/A $60,800
1996 No $62,000 $62,000 $62,000 N/A $62,000
2010 Tax Information
Click Here for 2010 Tax Bill Tax District: CW
2010 Final Millage Rate 20.9523
2010 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $2,304.75
Exemptions
A significant change in taxable value may occur
when sold due to changes in the market or the
removal of exemptions. Click here for more
information.
Ranked Sales See all transactions
Sale Date Book/Page Price OX V/I
21 Oct 2010 17066 / 0157 $425,000 M I
04 Aug 12955 / 2207 $230
000 Q I
2003 ,
02 Nov 08830 / 0705 $92,000 Q I
1994
Jul 1984
1977
05802/
0750 0
04559/
0069 0
$73,000 Q
$44,000 Q
2010 Land Information
Seawall: No Frontage: None
View:
Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method
Light Manufacture (41) 56x120 5.00 6720.0000 SF
[click here to hide] 2010 Building 1 Structural Elements Back to Top
Site Address: 509 D ST CLEARWATER 33756-
Quality: Average
Square Footage:
3578.00
Foundation:
Continuous Footing
Floor System: Slab
On Grade
Exterior Wall:
Concrete
Blk/Stucco
Roof Frame: Gable
& Hip
Roof Cover:
Corrugated Metal
Stories: 1
Living units: 0
Floor Finish:
Concrete Finish
Interior Finish:
Masonry
http://www.pepao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160060 12/31/2010
Property Appraiser General Information
I Fixtures: 4
Year Built: 1960
Effective Age: 23
Cooling: None
Open plot in New Window
Building 1 Sub Area Information
Page 3 of 4
Description Building? Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2
Base 2,618 2,618 1.00 2,618
Office Average 832 832 1.75 1,456
Open Porch Unfinished 0 128 0.20 26
Total Building finished SF: 3,450 Total Gross SF: 3,578 Total Effective SF: 4,100
[click here to hide] 2010 Extra Features
Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year
ASPHALT $1.75 1,500.00 $2,625.00 $2,625.00 0
AIR COND $2.00 1,610.00 $3,220.00 $1,288.00 1960
(click here to hide] Permit Data
Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in
field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting
office in which the structure is located.
Permit Number Description Issue Date Estimated Value
200703691 ASPHALT 05 Jul 2007 $15,000
200607707 ROOF 29 Se 2006 $7,550
Radius >_us (feet): t):
erials: ? 2009 Color ransparency:; 0.5 j Update Map
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=152921064620160060 12/31/2010
16
Lie, 1
I 1
8 OPU
1'1,,
Property Appraiser General Information
Page 4 of 4
you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and
How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right-click on the map; Select "Copy SVG"; Open a
Word document; Select "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK
How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right-click on the map; Select "This Frame"; Select
"Open Frame in New Window"; Print from the new window.
s
f 8. 1 n_ " c
. G Ir -0I
M
t 1 ...
li I. ?.. •¦ _? ?? ?FI1 V?
` t
. h
Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question/Comment about this
about this
ap rcel ie Results Search Page Me-
http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?pn=1 52921064620160060 12/31/2010
~^ V
f
B*
1110
iIl
Ilia
n
n
2
-1
m
n
c
m
br-n
1!. 1.
I
f a
I Mp 4•. J k K.,
i
p M??
q
N
i.
k PWt"' d .I""'
1 #
"
m
?
4 y ?
? w
,t
,m
to.
i
d %`V1
':'p
OF
t?? r
e? i R
ii
s9'
?r
727.796.8774 727.791.6942 fax
630 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756
° de ° ov 6°°°°e°m° D bpsb°q,v
° mo 8r'0°v g.?o?e em B ? ve 0°
B °a°m w e A d4 ° g° °?° $ ?
ao ° ^?° °° a s fan p
v
v ms 4° re c °m
T/O NEW EIfl. TOWER /]. AIC UNITS W1 SCREEN d 46 v
3a%AFE p
ae' a°? ° p 6v° ?pO/ 6 6?6
d e p D W 9 p
T/0 NEW PARAPET 8 ?8 t9 ° e ep p e ° ° ° ° p d d y
6 , P
73aAFF 4,,.
•
J
architecture
D e s i g n I T
Archl tec Lure Ilc
630 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Honda
33756-5337 USA
727.796.8774
727.791.6942
1375 S. Fort Hand-
Offae Impro-ents
1375 S. Fort Homson.
Cle-t.1, H 33756
0 Copyright
12/23/2010
kw w
doeaR?nAmhecne
wM1'w.
evnYVXhlwMla°Mi
anlwmr we
ev a
vBadAS."C 0 v0°°av vv°?
v f °
°
B °
p
° p o °g&eb °?i,' o Prop. Office Bldg. West Elevation
$ ?v° as° POm9 ° ° ?° 2 suUE: 3132'=ra'
4 m? D W P f
ff
9 i ° v;4° ?
?°
° ne ,° p 4 °
G
°
8
? oa °A >De
av v
?
° c
v
°
ELEV. TOWER
5T/0N'AEW FF
f?
s8 8 °
N
a
?\° ° 8 a v °
B p
° v A/C UNITS
R
d
q ° 0
g/VW ep? A
p
°
f
W (y
e°°
° W1 SCREEN
TIONEW PARAPET
BLDG.
EXU. Y p°
0
ad
am °°
pQ0 fQ? ?{
q, p
e
°
?
°
°?
e° 23'-0'AFF
AFF °''e °p 1P
p
II
ri
?
eWI,? g
p
.
40
k?:
n 111111 n
TO BE PAINTED
Prop. Office Bldg. & Warehouse
North Elevation
3 scnLE:3I3r=ra
Poe fv`G V°
p p v
g,
bq ?0}aa °
v 6 ?p9
p ? ° a ? 8
R ?
P aS,
a
°e*
p ne ° ??
°?6
° 648 d
? v
8
IQ gn
Prop. Office Bldg. East Elevation
4 SCALE: 3137•=1'd
8°0? Oe
a7/va
a
e
? o
a o ei
5 4° .
,?o??;aoro
v 6 p ?
ao P ?, e
vv .
0
°
I
A
4
° -
xv, Pv
pp 0°° V? F
p
a 8 A, ?
°
ep0pp Poyv Gape
e pNp?? ap e??.
n Prop. Warehouse East Elevation
SCALE 3/37=1'+"
TIO E%6i. BLDG.
T
T-1 -A-11
Robert E. Gregg
N 9927
C°oY of 1n i o °n's na
M1e afcM1 ecf of rec otl
ConV°cim tM1O c
ven eo
?e tl conElf lonlfe A
°etl
tee ,M1 k?,
°-1 - po„ fo
DroceMir f wCUClnenR
-h
-Ir
mporleOhOhaeporcn
MTV *1
the rspontlEllify of
02/09/11
job
revision dales
date
date
date
date
dote
dote
dote
date
SBM
REG
Prop- W. Elevs
ELI
LT--U,.
architecture
Exist. 1st Floor Office Floor Plan w/
Improvements
SCALE: 3/16'=1'-0` 2,667S'
D e s i g n ' 1
M. hltecl ure II(
630 Chestnut Street
Cle-ter. Florida
33756-5337 USA
79.796.8774
79791.6942
1375 5. Fort Homnn
Oft- Improvements
0 Copyright
12/23/2010
.f
hPe prycN
Rh-r
olMWxJUe
1_Witlxmriwmlvice
mm'rro momma x
r.wem?c.a I•-
wmrrnw?
oHm?wm.?ham
Robert E. Gregg
X 9927
Col. of IM1h Plan s not
Vealetleantl oa etl by
Controcrar rM1Oll checl
vilify aYilmem'um
uoa coomi„me ml
n.m c oeit'mm. eu
m.?r. ce.cl.r o
miimf rneu ea
nherfeawlro orcNl.cl
m ,-dg m
p'tte.dvp a --q
vi1M1 e
ruepaletl 6sae0onces
Gohach shill remain
the res0onslbllily o1
IM1e conlraclor.
3/14/2011
I
lob
E revision dates
data
date
I
date
date
date
date
date
date
SEM
REG
Floor Plan
1
•
u
J
J
architecture
Exist. 2nd Floor Office Floor Plan w/
Improvements
Scn`E: 3116'=1'V 270.5 SF
D e s i g n 1 I
Architecture tic
630 Chestnut Skeet
ge"'ater, Flalda
337565141 USA
727.7966774
777.791.6942
13755. Fort Harrison
Office Improvements
a Copyright
12'23/1010
Ri do.MphlMpopdM I
d OegneNdJec'nea
aatmNim
may IK dcwip [e
telnowcee,puEHteo,
oXwetlmue0lnav
vNk?
oNhaimfimbar.
Robert E. Gregg
09927
covr of mlt vlaa it nal
ae ov
ine o?cmtEci oltreco?a
Conita<lo?tholl chac4
sal' mamea?lo.?
fi-
naa ? I,el?im??. en
onltl??f tc?poll De
reoonaa m the t,mmxt
m .aHtly v
axaem?a e, ?WVma
wuh c <nv?.
ulr.vat.e aceawa<af
<vm call,emor
m. rt-- n
n:mnllr m
3/14/2011
Nd
revision dat-
dote
date
date
date
date
date
date
date
SBM
REG
Floor Plan
2
i •f
Exist. Warehouse Floor Plan
SCALE 3/16°= I'4'
r?
J
arcs hlt't_ure
m
D e s 9, n i
Architecure it
630 Chestnut 59ee.
Clearwater. Florida
33756-5337 USA
727796.9774
727.791.6942
13755. Fort Harrison
)ffica Improvement!
a Copyright
17/1372010
R &-g tbs.roeny
oiaegyilNCYMUe
r<. u?arroaw?mmce
m swore h
rooa,an o?'>u?.t
m..e r.?m?om
nom xnnm
o iro?wno.,mm
Robed E. Gregg
y.'r. 19927
capv or mir I: oo?
&`i male oa o iaeeor
dw7?, m. omNiem or cocoa
?.fD4,1(F comacmnnmi re.a
ma nary eo Geamiwe
m num pianior r
poi e.cy nv.?
n ,rrwmie.,.
u?won.awoeaancm
rice mm rayon
in. r.raooaninrv or
me eeerrocto?.
3/14/2011
job
revision dotes:
date
date
date
date
date
dale
date
date
SBM
REG
Floor Plan
3
'Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-624865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
CASE N U M BER:
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION W ITH A COM PLETE LEVEL ON E OR LEVEL TW O APPLIC ATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 03/29/2006)
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT II!N?F?O?RpM,A?TTIOON: (Code Section 4,202.A)
APPL (CANT N AM E: ? ?J 1 `? " ?„ V ?? F 00 Irl G' ,,
MAILING ADDRESS: _? ?'"/?? +? l J
PHONE NUMBER: r 72 r CELLNUMBER:
PROPERTY OW N ER(S): R_111 F50 l !y;- Q p C??f" I tom/ d 3 ?s'
List ALL owners on the deed y? i ?ro ?j,4 F ,It-i v q, A v ? ?w?? ,I
AGENT NAME: (ac??J?yr?y; {dy I _1=.- i (! F r ?'/ vl
MAILINGADDRESS: C? .lei-° ''" ?? ?-? ???' la' r'+
PHONE NUMBER: )FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed orde%eloped onthe parcel proposed for the dewlopment.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
P _o9-5?v L c P? ?lN IL" U1?1
\h>,215j1q or-
P?oNTr'a (mil t7.
PLEAS E TYPE OR PRINT-
C:IDocuments and Settings IderekfergusonlDeskto pln ewplanning5lesIComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc
Page 1 of 2
2. LIGHTING:
3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community c haracter of the Cityof Clear water.
4. PROPERTY VALUES:
J
6. SPECIAL AREAOR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAYBE NECESSARYTO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSH EET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
hotog h the property described inthis application.
?4?
Signature of property 0w er or p serdati
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to a nd s ubscribed before me this _I Q_ day of
0.? A.D. 20--a_to me and/or by
?11?e who is personally known has
produced
QNs tication.
rypubli ,
Mycommissionwores: NOTARY LIC-STAT.EOFFLORIDA
T.vnn A. Matthews
- Expires: OCT.13, 2011
BOND)rD TKRU ATLANITC BONDING CO., INC.
C.0ocuments and SetfingslderekferqusonlDesktoplnewptarWngfleslComprehensive LandscapeFrogram2006.doc
Page 2 of 2
Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the
business is closed.
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program vull have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with anyspecial area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for devel opine nt is located.
butler Design Group, Inc
Ron Belko
4203 46' Avenue North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33714
Ph (727) 521-1684
Fax (727) 527-7422
E-mail: bdg j ktampabay.lT. com
ronspl ansnta myabay.n•.com
nws;
L;md,tape Dc,l;4twr
Tree Inventory
1375 S. Ft Harrison
Clearwater, Florida
I
February 9, 2011
FNGLA
747
We Know What Grox'.e
Hoelivullorc hofvsnimwl
I have completed an assessment of all trees (4" dbh or greater) on the subject site and
within 25' of the property boundaries. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability
(rating of 1-5) and any potential hazards of these trees.
# arrsite TREE DBH & SPECIES RATFNC CnMMFNTC
1 42" Laurel Oak 1 Dead, Hazardous
2 off 22" Live Oak 2 Potential hazard, Dead wood, In wires, Poor
Site
pruning, Mechanical injury to trunk, Co-dominate,
Low canopy, need to remove 1 leader (in
wires/around wires/ abrading wires), 1 of the two
remaining leaders low (truck clearance issue)
remainder of tree is poor. Root plate is elevated
3 off 16" Laurel Oak 3 Co-dominate, Inclusions, Poor pruning, In wires,
site Mistletoe, Poor root flare %: circumferences, Dead
wood, Competing with tree #4, need to remove
several branches for truck/vehicle clearance and
wire conflict, remainder of tree fair. Root plate is
elevated
4 40" Live Oak 4 Large mature tree, Mechanical injury to roots and
trunk, Poor pruning, girdling roots, Dead wood,
recent 8" heading cut to limb. Confined root space,
Cross branching, minor visible decay, several small
limbs should be removed. Elevated root plate
5 24" Ficus benjamina 1 Heavy freeze damage
6 6",6" Ligustrum 2 Dying, splitting, Very poor structure, Heading cuts,
Dead wood
7 5", 8" Bottlebrush 2 Mechanical injury to root flare, Declining, Anemic,
Ball moss, Poor structure, Poor pruning
8 14" Sabal Palm 3
9 18" Sabal Palm 3
10 14" Washingtonia Palm 3 Rail road rail in trunk flare, tree is 50'+ tall, pruning
with specialized equipment would be required.
11 14" Sabal Palm 3
12 Off 10" Sabal Palm 3
Site
13 off 10" Live Oak 3 Poor pruning, Poor structure
Site
14 off 8" Live Oak 2 Very poor structure, nearly 90° bend to canopy,
Site
Large girdling root, Co-dominate, No reasonable
corrective measures
15 16" Laurel Oak 3 Co-dominate, Inclusions, Large steel pole anchor in
root flare, Dead wood
16 12" Live Oak 2 90° bend to canopy, Very poor structure, Co-
dominate
17 17",13" Laurel Oak 1 Hazardous tree, evidence of prior failure, split
storm damage with decay, Could fail very soon,
Close to street, sidewalk and trail. Large hole in the
better of the two leaders
18 16" Sabal Palm 4
19 off 10" Live Oak 3 Mechanical injury to trunk and roots, Poor
Site structure, Girdling roots
20 off 14" Live Oak 3 Mechanical injury to roots, cross branching, Poor
Site
structure, Poor pruning
21 14" Sabal Palm 3 Mechanical injury to trunk, Water spigot attached
to trunk
22 off 17" Live Oak 3 Die-back, Dead wood, Mechanical fasteners in
site trunk Co-dominate, Low canopy with mechanical
injury, Poor pruning, in wires potential hazard
23 off 20" Live Oak 3 Poor Pruning, Poor structure, Mechanical injury to
site low hanging limbs, Dead wood, small broken limbs,
Needs pruning
I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I
further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this
issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome.
Sincerely,
Ron Belko
FNGLA Certified Landscape Designer: #D31-66
FNGLA Certified Horticulture Professional: #H31-6445
ISA Certified Arborist: #FL-5802A
ISA Certified Municipal Specialist: FL-5802M
N
A
a ?
22 5
?N? E? I ? T 23 Qv
d*
r S 21
17 QI
SILT FENC \ QV 2b rgeuxxr?
15 a
2 6 ?.r E 1STORY O MERCIPL
a Q
14 QV o ?, I
a ? 0
1 TORY COMMERCIu
s
Qv 1g
A? r S
I
s 13 QL' S 18
e?NN ? 4 I
*c:, 7/
12 S [YV A/ I
// / e f 1 QI \
11 S SILT FENCE ?. SILT FENCE
r? ? f1
l Fb r 1 STORY COMMERCIAL I
/ 2 STORY COMMERLIX 5
j r ? I
I
f0 WF
T d
S - -
i L 6 rEEA Q 4
9ro?.,.u r ? -
3 2
2
QV 7
n SILT FENCE
iueuweuoe .
4I I E- O JSJ I? fd SILT FENCE
6 v
unxuax SILT FENCE - ?? --
T. PP?
Tree Inventory Legend
aye Behr nD?°,? em?a
Qv Quercus vlrylnlana Llve Oak
QI Quercus Iaunfolla Laurel Oak
On Quercus nlgra Water Oak
Wr as mgtoma ro u5ta Washington palm
5p a s Palmetto a s a age a m
Cv Ca1I15tem0P1 vlmmalls Bottle Brush
fb Flcus benLamma Flcus
LT L3u5trum japonica Tree form Ilgustrum
PLEASE SEE A CCOMPAN YING WORD
DOCUMENT FOR PERTINENT COMMENTS
REGARDING TREE CONDITIONS.
TREE INVENTORY DETAIL
TREE ADDED/CHANGED FROM SURVEY
REE CANOPY/ CRZ*
( 8 EE SYMBOL
{ A4Z REE DBH
EE BOTANICAL ABBR.
S TREE INVENTORY
RATIN G
General Notes
Na. Revision/Issue Dote
n,m Name - ---
Tree Inventory by:
BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, IN
4203 46TH AYE N. ST. PETERSBURG FL 33714
m m-u1-1Md, rM alnuw.wr sxw
-rKO
TREE INVENTORY NUMBER DAAW N -B-Y. . RDN ON BELNYL
-C6 i-I Root Zone (Trunk formula) 2 K DBH Deter CRZ (m feel) CERTIFIED ARBORIST # FL-5802,
ISA MUNICIPAL
CRZ/Canopy for palms (on s'le) referenced of SPECIALIST: FL-58021
CHECKED BY: CHUCK BUTLER
CERTIFIED ARBORIST # FL-1235A
P-j- Nom. - wm>v
1375 S. FORT HARRISONAVE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
FORT
SCALE: 1"=20'
20 0 10 20 40
TREE INVENTORY
D.I' 02109111 L3
?` 1n 20F OFF