FLD2011-03011; 984 ELDORADO AVE; CAVILL RESIDENCEFLD2011-03011
984 ELDORADO AVE
Date Received: 3/1/201111:56:45 AM
Cavill Residence
ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density
Residential
LAND USE: Residential Urban (7.5 du/acre)
ATLAS PAGE: 238A
PLANNER OF RECORD: ESC
PLANNER: Ellen Crandall, Planner 11
CDB Meeting Date: May 17, 2011
Case Number: FLD2011-03011
Agenda Item: D.4.
Owner/Applicant: Michael Cavill
Agent: Steven A. Williamson Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns LLP
Address: 984 Eldorado Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for a single-family detached dwelling
with accessory swimming pool and deck within the Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District with a front (east) setback of
three feet where 10 feet is allowed but may be varied based on the
criteria specified in Community Development Code Section 2-204.E.,
and a rear (west) setback of zero feet (to deck as measured from
Coastal Construction Control Line) where zero feet is allowed as a
Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-204.E.
ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU)
PROPERTY USE: Current: Single-Family Detached Dwelling
Proposed: Single-Family Detached Dwelling
EXISTING North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
SURROUNDING Detached Dwellings
ZONING AND USES: South: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
East: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District
Water
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.3 acre subject property is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 250
feet north of Juniper Street. The property is presently a vacant lot. The properties to the north,
south, and east, are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the properties
to the north and east are developed with detached dwellings. The property to the south is a vacant
lot. Land to the west is zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District and is the Gulf of Mexico.
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-03011- Page 1 of 5
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a single-family detached dwelling with accessory swimming pool
and deck. The request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the requested rear
(west) setback to the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) for the swimming pool/deck.
The swimming pool/deck will have a zero foot setback from the CCCL which is consistent with
houses in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Pursuant to Community Development
Code (CDC) Section 3-905.C.2 any requests to modify setback requirements from the CCCL
shall be considered through a Level Two development process.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is
discussed below.
Density: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category,
the allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot area is 12,759 square feet (0.3 acres), one
dwelling unit is allowed and therefore, the proposed density is in compliance.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban
(RU) land use category, the allowable ISR is 0.65. The site is in compliance as an ISR of 0.418
is proposed.
Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is
no minimum lot area. The lot area of the subject property is 12,759 square feet which exceeds
the detached dwelling minimum standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is
no minimum lot width. The subject property lot width is 110 feet which exceeds the detached
dwelling minimum standard of 50 feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill
projects, two parking spaces are required. The proposal is to provide three off-street parking
spaces as through two driveways and a single-car and a double-car garage for the dwelling,
which is consistent with the above.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.14.1, air conditioning and similar
mechanical equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such
equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing
units for air conditioners as well as pool equipment will be placed adjacent to the side of the
dwelling. Compliance with screening requirements will be reviewed at time of building permit
submittal.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912 all utilities including individual distribution lines shall
be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. This proposal will
comply with this requirement.
Solid Waste: The dwelling unit will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal which
will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires these black barrels to be
Community Development Board - May17, 2011
FLD2011-03011- Page 2 of 5
screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls, fences or other
appropriate screening materials will be reviewed at time of building permit submittal.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, within the LMDR District, Residential
Infill Projects shall have a front setback between 10 - 25 feet, a side setback between zero to five
feet, and a rear setback between zero and 15 feet. However these criteria are guidelines and may
be varied. The proposal includes a rear (west) setback of zero feet with a front setback of 3 feet
(to stairs) and no reduction to side setbacks and is therefore compliant with the above referenced
requirements.
The reduction in the rear setback allows for a development consistent with the surrounding and
emerging development pattern. Many of the existing pools and decks in the vicinity have or
appear to have zero foot setbacks to the CCCL. A setback of zero feet from the CCCL to an in
ground pool and deck was approved for 974 Eldorado (FLD2010-11031), 740 Eldorado Avenue
(FLD2009-10040) 1000 Eldorado (FLD2011-01002) and for 1154 and 1160 Mandalay Point
Road (FLD2009-02004). Existing pools and decks to the south of the subject property are set
back zero feet from the CCCL for pool and decks based upon surveys provided for FLD2010-
11031 (926 and 920 Eldorado). In addition, review of aerial photography show that several
existing waterfront properties in the vicinity appear to have up to zero foot structural setbacks to
the CCCL including 14 Somerset Street, 9 Cambria Street, 724, 734, 740, 770, 800, 804, 856,
880, 920, 926, 944, 946, 956, 964, 970, 1002 Eldorado Avenue, 1154, 1160, 1170, 1176, 1188,
1192, and 1198 Mandalay Point Road. Please see Exhibit "C" of the applicant's submission for
aerial photographs supporting these addresses. Therefore, the rear setback reduction to provide a
typical amenity of a pool and decking for a beachfront detached dwelling is justified and
consistent with the emerging development pattern.
The reduction in the front setback allows for a development consistent with the surrounding and
emerging development pattern. Many of the existing single-family detached dwellings in the
vicinity have or appear to have reduced front setbacks of 3 feet or less. Review of aerial
photography show that several existing Eldorado properties in the vicinity appear to have front
setbacks of 3 feet including 920, 936, 946, 974, 1000, 1002, 1020, 1022, 1030, 1046, 1058, 1070,
1078, and 1086 Eldorado. Please see Exhibit "D" of the applicant's submission for aerial
photographs supporting these addresses.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects,
the maximum building height in the LMDR District is 30 feet. The building height of the
detached dwelling will maintain a maximum building height of 29.9 feet above base flood
elevation as measured to the midpoint of a sloped roof, which is consistent with the above, as
well as with the definition of "height, building or structure" as set forth in Article 8 of the CDC.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subject property.
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-03011- Page 3 of 5
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
204:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 7.5 du/ac 3.3 du/ac X
ISR 0.65 0.41 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 12,759 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 110 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 10-25 feet East: 3 feet (to stairs) X'
Rear: 0 - 10 feet West: Zero feet (to deck) X
Maximum Height 30 feet 29.9 feet X
Minimum Off'-Street Parkin 2 spaces per dwelling unit 3 spaces X
I See Analysis in Staff Report
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.E
(Residential Infill Project):
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity
or other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project x
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which X
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, x
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-03011- Page 4 of 5
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of April 7, 2011 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.3 acres is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 250 feet
north of Juniper Street;
2. That the property is currently a vacant lot;
3. That the proposal is to construct a single-family detached dwelling with an accessory
swimming pool and deck;
4. That the proposal includes a rear setback of zero feet from the Coastal Construction Control
Line (CCCL) to deck, and a front setback of 3 feet (to stairs);
5. That pursuant to CDC Section 3-905.C.2, any requests to modify setback requirements from
the CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process; and
6. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
204 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
204.E of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development approval for a single-family detached dwelling with accessory
swimming pool and deck within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a
front (east) setback of three feet where 10 feet is allowed but may be varied based on the criteria
specified in Community Development Code Section 2-204.E., and a rear (west) setback of zero
feet (to deck as measured from Coastal Construction Control Line) where zero feet is allowed as
a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-
204.E, subject to the following conditions of approval:
Community Development Board -May 17, 2011
FLD2011-03011-Page 5 of 5
Conditions of Approval:
1. That there are no obstructions in the waterfront site visibility triangles as per CDC Section 3-
904.B;
2. That pool and deck be constructed no higher than 12 inches or less above existing grade; and
3. That outdoor mechanical equipment including air conditioning and pool equipment be
screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; and
4. That black barrels shall be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Attachments: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board - May 17, 2011
FLD2011-03011- Page 6 of 5
O e s 10 n0 ° pgh 6
o 103816 14 10 1?0 9
spry e
F 124S 100 ° 110
°
D 103 1040 ° 3 o e
? 103 15
0 15 7 0
p?1 _
Z n n9s 10 10)7 $ - - 2 z
00 14 103 10 16 13.5
F 110 10 ° 1033 o $ o
1030 1031 17
p
13
?
U 10° ^ e \
? $
\h
102 ° 10 18 1p3 "O/s ?O? ?JG
=2
9 &0 a° .9
21
h
0 PJ
7 °\
2
10
11
?D $ 102 \ ? g '9
102 ?
O
19 71
11
,X 6 710 aA `0
10 20 102 'O?S 12 67
1
A
1 $
95
7 Msl
>0 ? 13 O
g>04 6 13
14 co I \?$
Gulf of 1100r 'a 67
14
Mexico 7 , ° y 15
70 m Q \ '? \ \ °?8 7000 1
1 \ m° 18 9 ,79$15
6 3
\ Q ?>0 $ \ \ > 9? " J
m.
4
1901 Y
'
25 ?OOZ
B9a
?Q
7 17 1219 66
700
2 99
7
s
/
a
p00
v
SC?N 11°
\ QO
m
O
18
V
°
??
7
334000 \ " ?/ ° 967 Q °1gQ'1 98? / °o 9`p2/
°
5 1
V
188?
J 7L y
110 ' 963 5 Q Q 'SO 19 cD / F`yG71- -.90
770
c
°
GOVT LOT 5
O Deta
` 69 *1+
` 0
y76 V
GOVT LOT 5 m 2 2
X 4 cling
5
9A
:
-
7
,4
6 ? 7 70
W 4p '91510 7 w97j 3
°
h
?
h. 6
?7j \ ?
2 ?j 1
40 8970
97? J? 64
2
8 `/U/\/ 11 ° " 7 9A,
„ 3
\
H
W l /HERS
9
1 9
" 931 0 6 9149
0 7 966 Q' $' 8 8 96B 4969 2 ))l.a
h 11
113
14
0
0 96
O
96, QA Cl 9 964^ FR S? #66 1 10 9649
3
6
U O 9 10 m?Bp710 4zs 11 96
°
63
96a '
Q 41
13
6
).6
.
"
wqY
LL 5 s^ Q 96 8
> 6 ,
1
tt
96311°
U 4 h 9$75 h 956 Y Ix 9 Q 1 9z1s1
h $S9 9$9q
? ?U 6
110
?
„
h 5
9> ,? 955 954
7 9
h 4 Z 12 952y B
J?S9
3
5
10
946- 947 4953 q 95? 'a
?
4 3 ? 13 .X 5 m ?SSq
8 94? ?S1
Existing Use Map
Owner: Michael Cavill Case: FLD201 1-0301 1
Site: 984 Eldorado Avenue Property Size: 0.29 Acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-069-0040 Atlas Page: 238A
o z
?u
4
?e9y
PROJECT uj
SITE <
o?
oR ?oJ?u
ST?E?T
e
D
Q
Q
1
3
o Q LAUREL
Z ST
Sessani?e t Guava
t
KIPLING PLAZA
Fi F1
Location Map
Owner: Michael Cavill Case: FLD201 1-0301 1
Site: 984 Eldorado Avenue Property Size: 0.29 Acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-069-0040 Atlas Page: 238A
1044 ? IU4
NZ,
1038
0
1041 1094 109 '? ?p,?g e 2
1038 103 1040
103 1037 LMDR
z
1034 1035 C,9 q0?
1032 1033 1034 ^p'.g 19t
1030 1031 10
1028 1029
10P6 1030
1021 g01p
1024
1022 LMDR 24 7 LMDR
1020
OS/R 1018 102 10?,S
7016 1019 X01
10?? '0j0
>010 1015
>01
>0, 6 1011
LMDR
1p
o4
°?2
100 Q 1p°' °°° LMDR
99
?? 990 QO '00' ;700? ?o7j 6
7
P ••
°2 9
9
? 44
4
?
°°
1
O t?
O
1
?O 98
NOO,Q ?` 'OO3
9 9g
j
`/V? 98 Q 100 89
1
S
98? V
Q M? gp3
983
o
924 980
9T1 LMDR 44 g80 g1
?y^ Q 981
975 9'4 97j rte/ 916
C
9T
9?3
970 9jS 974
p /y. 973
970 " LMDR 980 ?l
9j5 ?6
97,
B
969
966 Q 966 Q
964 Q 967 964 ?US 96g 965 966 ?Q
T
t7
9
63 960
LMDR v 963 960 2 11
0
1
v LMDR 961 963
907 _-3 9` LMDR 956 `V
948 955 95954 2 96 LMDR 950
946 947 953 952 ryM`.t
944 V 955 948 957
ZONING
Owner: Michael Cavill Case: FLD201 1-0301 1
Site: 984 Eldorado Avenue Property Size: 0.29 Acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-069-0040 Atlas Page: 238A
r
l
t
r
,
p"
•.?d
`'?
r
t
I
•
,
r
? t
`
,^
?
} ?
'r
Y
,t?y?++
r
; YC o O
?
y,?,?{
'
??
=
t:, t
?
?$?
? d p
' fir
• ?
•,?
j?y?r"
,
? *??,
M? ?2. i i t, r ! ? ,
'
t •
'
`
"' r!t
T
A
C
?14
h?
.•
r * " it W r !! ?
r' UR T11
L ,y
I .
t ? •
?
?
?
? -.,?,? . ' , dot ? `'
L,
? .p s
??
?
?
y`.
''? ?ra
'?
,
?
{.
K.. ? 'r, - • ',/? 5 ? ?, ? ?"?r.1. w 1? ._? ? ? ..,}, i
v
r5
Aerial Map
Owner: Michael Cavill Case: FLD201 1-0301 1
Site: 984 Eldorado Avenue Property Size: 0.29 Acres
PIN: 05-29-15-54666-069-0040 Atlas Page: 238A
View looking at the east side of the property. (front)
View of the west side of the property from between the rear View looking at the east side of the property. (front)
property line and the Gulf of Mexico.
984 Eldorado
FLD2011-03011
Page 1 of 1
View looking at the east side of the property. (front)
Ellen Crandall
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4836
ellen.crandall(&myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
¦ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2010 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
Planner I
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida December 2009 to May 2010
Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building Permits, Sign Permits, Business Tax
Receipts, and Landscape Plans as well as Comprehensive Sign Program Applications, and Flexible
Standard Developments. Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land
resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Interdepartmental and
zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses
concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at
various review committees, boards, and meetings.
Community Planner
Bradford County, Towanda, Pennsylvania January 2008 to May 2009
Coordinates with the 51 municipalities in Bradford County and assisted them in writing
Comprehensive Plans, developing ordinances, and general public and municipal education on zoning,
land use, and ordinances. I developed a comprehensive Zoning Lexicon that included zoning maps,
districts and definitions for all municipalities with zoning ordinances. Assisted in the County Parks
Plan and in developing a comprehensive Park's book listing all the parks in Bradford County. I
assisted mapping the natural gas wells as well as printing maps and parcel data for the gas companies.
¦ Intern
Pennsylvania Geologic Survey, Middletown, Pennsylvania May 2006 to September 2006
Scanned geologic maps, updated documents and assisted in general office tasks.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, - Major: Geography, - Minor: Art, - Certificate: Geographic Information System
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist
LEED Green Associate, Currently pursuing
a Planning Department
00 100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
U- Telephoner 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
U SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
O SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
D SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
• .-.. • ......-...., . 1- -1'1 g vIFIFnI-I1kr,1w r,VCi• 1 11rr VrlWW I IWN.- 1VVue aec[wn
APPLICANT NAME: MCHAEL CAVILL
MAILING ADDRESS: 4161 Barl0w..ROad, 07oss PlAims, W. 53528
PHONE NUMBER: 08081225-1770 FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same. as Applicant. .
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Steven A. Williamson, Esquire, -46bnson, PcVe, Bokor, Rappel &
MAILING ADDRESS: 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 451-1 81 $ FAX NUMBER: 727)462-0165
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: +o<?<. ,...„ ..... ,
B.
PROJECT NAME:
STREET ADDRESS
PARCEL NUMBER(S):
PARCEL SIZE (acres):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PROPOSED USE(S):
TION:
Cavill Residence PROJECT VALUATION: $. 1,500,000.00
Vacant (formerly 984 Eldoradol (Estimate - Dwe
See Exhibit "A" attached.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See-Exhibit
rr
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
PARCEL SIZE (square feet): -1-4 , i Jy :544• ?z
r LLP
--,yawa,an.,e,guavmuesra pN, rung dept Torms utt)MesideMiai Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page I of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7)
D.
?
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to
nnr?ra Applicability Criteria 1 through 6
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
CA)oaanents and SettingsWwek.lergusoMDesldop%oanning dept km3 0708Vtesidential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-1 140C
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria)
? Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each Criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
.-.-p hihit "B" attached for responses to
Residential Infill Project Criteria 1- 7
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties. (include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
C kDoamnents arW Set ings%derekfergusonM)esktopVlanning dept forms 0708%Residw ial Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
C1 A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
? Proposed stonmwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? A narrative describing the proposed stonmwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one of the following):
*mAt
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
tormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4' DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;
? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:1Documents and SettingsWerekferguson%Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708Y2esiden0al Infdl Project (FLD) Woo 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
0 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24° x 361:
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
_ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
- Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is
required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval.
O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area,
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
_ easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
O REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11);
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
- Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:tDocuments and SettingMerekfergusonMDesktopl#anning dept forms 0706UtesideMal Infill Project (FlD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
_ schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
_ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names,
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mb(es, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS-with the following information;
All sides of all buildings;
Dimensioned,
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
Materials;
? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/: X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (81%X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:1Documents and SellingskierekfergusonlDesktoptplanning dept fors 070SWesidential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
O Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
*IMACT N1TIA4 Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
N - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
I] Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
\NITt
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CON- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
LATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photogra a pro rty described in this awliration.
pAopeoelr?se ntre
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
pr? ubscribed before me this 25Mday of
=i jt. A.D. 20-to me and/or by
St
vt? who is personally knownM&
NF9 ??41.Wyr"P? Ci'
Wary ptAlic, ????,, ,••
My commission expires:
=cal ?? .,? (}trrr! . .?il13
CMowments and SettingsWerekfergusonM)esktoptpLa ng dept forms 0708%Residential Infill Project (F .,
Page 7 of 8 s y: - % JAYNE E. SEARS
;. Commission # DD 907040
ExPres Septan1w 2, 2013
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
Michael Cavill
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record tide holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
Parcel. No...,. 05/29/15/54666/069/0040
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe mquesg'
Fl axi hl P r3PVP1 =firmni- • armmval.
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doesido) appoint
Steven A. Williawm, : FSga re WW6r
Johnson, _ Pope,. Bakor., •Rg5pe . & Burns, IU
as (histtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application;
7. That Uwe), the u d rsig audtoril reby certify that the foregoing is true and correct
_
Y
Michael Cavil Tyer rt owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned. an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida. on ibis -D
day of
..e. b UAI z + personally appeared Michas CaV 111 who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she Nlty understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Pubfi Sig ature
Nut,ry Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: Jam!/ ?f ?/ j?
Mooomts and SWngAdwWLfa+ywonlDukt P Wwv q dot perms 07081ResideMIN IrAl Pr*d (RD) 2009 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 9
Exhibit "A"
A portion of Lot 3, all of Lot 4 and a portion of Lot 5, Block 69, Mandalay, according to the map or plat- - - - _ ; ;
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, pages 32 through 35 inclusive, of the Public Records of Pinellas '
County, Florida, being further described as follows: ,- ;
Commence at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 4, Block 62 of said subdivision; thence along the'Southerl,?
right of way of Island Drive extended N. 65058'30"W., 60.00 feet to the Northeasterly comer dAAId,.ot
5; thence Southerly along ttie Westerly right of way of Eldorado Avenue, said right of way-deing dhfiflled
by a curve concaved Southeasterly, having a length of 30,01 feet, a radius of 2645.50 feef, a chQY4',,',
bearing and distance of S. 22030'42" W., 30.01 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence Leaving saiq }fight of
way N. 65058'-30"W., 11.0.03 feet along the Southerly boundary of land as described In',V14rranty O,bed
recorded in Official Records Book 16990, Page 1299, Public Records of Pinellas P6&iiy, Florida, to'the
Westerly boundary of said Lot 5; thence Southerly along said Westerly boundgt7 of Lot Sian -the Westerly
boundaries of said Lots 4 and 3, along a curve concaved Southeasterly, havin a length of, 119.60 feet, a
radius of 2755.50 feet, a chord bearing and distance of S. 21001133" W., 119. feet to,a,point which is
the Southwesterly comer of the North 1/2 of said Lot 3; thence leaving said Westedy-i oundary of Lot 3,
S. 69043123" E, along the South boundary of the North 1/2 of said dot 3, 110.00 feet to the Westerly right
of way of Eldorado Avenue; thence along said Westerly right of wake being defined by a curve concaved
Southeasterly, having a length of 112.41 feet, a radius of 2645.50 feet; ,,a chouf,?bearing and distance of N.
20058'10" E., 112.40 feet to the Point of Beginning. ?;
EXHIBIT "B"
TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
(Cavill)
The subject property is located on the westerly side of Eldorado Avenue
(formerly 984 Eldorado) on North Clearwater Beach. The parcel is approximately
0.3 acre comprised of vacant platted lots in Mandalay Subdivision. The subject
Property is bisected by the Coastal Construction Control Line ("CCCL"). The
platted boundary of the subject property extends 32 feet or more west of the
CCCL and the Gulf is over 400' beyond the platted lot line. The non-functioning
concrete seawall previously located on the subject property has been removed.
The subject property is zoned "LMDR" with a land use designation of "Residential
Urban." The reason for this request is to allow the Applicant to build the
proposed detached single-family dwelling on the property with a reduced front
setback and a pool and deck having a reduced rear setback to the CCCL.
Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval of a
Residential Infill Redevelopment Project to permit construction of a single-family
detached dwelling, pool and deck in the Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR) District with:
(i) a Lot Area of 12,759 square feet, where 5,000 square feet is
required;
(ii) a Lot Width of 110 feet where 50' is required;
(iii) a front (east) setback of 5'-5" to building and 3' to stairs where 25' is
required;
(iv) a side (north) setback of 8'-4" to building and 10'-10" to pool deck
where 5' is required;
(v) a side (south) setback of 26'-2" to building, 6-2" to pavement and
3'-3" to 6' high gate column where 5' is required;
(vi) a rear (west) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line
(CCCL) of 20'-1" to building, 0' to pool deck and 3' to pool where 10'
is required;
(vii) a height of 29'-11" above B.F.E., where 30' is the maximum allowed
by Code; and
(viii) two driveways on Eldorado Avenue;
under the provisions of Section 2-204.E, Clearwater Community
Development Code.
Section D. Written Submittal Requirements
General Applicability Criteria:
1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the
scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The subject property has residential homes to the north, south and east (across
Eldorado Avenue) with private and public beach land to the west. The other
homes in this area of Eldorado Avenue are of varying sizes with which the
proposed 4,215 sq. ft. residence is compatible. For example, the residences
immediately adjoining the subject parcel to the north and south are 4,200+ sq. ft.
while others on the west side of Eldorado Avenue are 6,000+ sq. ft. The
proposed front and CCCL setbacks are consistent with the pattern of
development on North Clearwater Beach and are in harmony with the character
of adjacent properties.
As to the proposed CCCL setback, aerial photographs of the homes fronting the
Gulf of Mexico and impacted by the CCCL reflect other residences with pools,
other accessory structures or principal structures located immediately adjacent to
the CCCL or within the minimum standard setback to the CCCL. Although
similarly developed homes are several hundred feet from the subject property,
the CCCL only impacts those homes fronting the Gulf of Mexico and all homes
fronting the Gulf of Mexico should be reviewed for compatibility and consistency
purposes.
A setback of 0' from the CCCL to an in-ground pool and deck was approved for
740 Eldorado Avenue (FLD2009-10040) and for 1154 and 1160 Mandalay Point
Road (FLD2009-02004). When comparing the current request to the request
approved for 740 Eldorado, it should be noted that the subject property (1000
Eldorado) is located further to the north on the beach and the CCCL is a greater
distance from the mean high water line (approximately 500'). The requested
relief will not create any negative visual impacts to the adjacent property owners.
In addition to the recent foregoing CCCL cases, please see the attached
Exhibit "C", which sets forth other properties along Clearwater Beach that appear
to have structures located within the required CCCL setback.
As to the proposed front setback, please note that a previously approved site
plan on the subject parcel (FLS2010-07002) approved a front setback of 5' to
building and 1' to stairs. The proposed plan has a slightly greater front setback of
5'5" to building and 3' to stairs. A visual inspection of Eldorado Avenue reflects
that many of the residences are located within 5' of the sidewalk and have steps
2
or entryways that have 0' setback to the sidewalk, including, but not limited to,
the residence immediately adjacent to the subject property to the north, which
appears to have a 0'-3' front setback. Please see the attached Exhibit "D", which
includes street facade photographs and aerial photos depicting the reduced
setbacks.
2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the
appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or
significantly impair the value thereof.
The value of the subject property and the surrounding properties on the westerly
side of Eldorado Avenue are significant because of the unique location, and the
requested relief from setbacks will not dilute those values nor hinder
development of the neighboring land. Visually, the reduced front setback is
eased by indentations accommodating the stairs and garage entrance, and is in
line with the residence of adjacent properties, and the reduced rear/CCCL
setback will not be apparent, due to the significant accretion of beach at the rear
of the property and the low profile of a pool.
3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety
of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
Health and safety is not adversely impacted, as the use shall continue to be
residential. The two driveways allow more than adequate off street parking area
for the residents and their guests such as to not impede circulation on Eldorado
Avenue.
4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
There is no change in density of the subject property, which will remain as one
single-family residence. Traffic is not impacted by the proposed construction of a
single-family dwelling, which replaces a residence that previously existed on the
property.
5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character
of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The community character of this area of Mandalay Subdivision located on the
westerly side of Eldorado Avenue is one of large single-family residences. With
regard to the front and rear/CCCL setback reductions, the development pattern
along Eldorado is moving from typical ranch style Florida homes toward larger
estate homes which occupy a greater portion of the lot area than the existing
homes. Aerial photos of the homes constructed along the Gulf of Mexico on
north Clearwater Beach reflect that several existing waterfront detached
dwellings appear to have zero foot structural and building setbacks to the CCCL,
as shown on Exhibit "C" and residences and stairs located within current front
setbacks as shown on Exhibit "D." The requested rear setback reduction to
provide the amenity of a pool and deck for a beachfront home is justified and
consistent with the existing development pattern and the development of homes
during the last 5 years. Likewise, the requested front setback reduction is
consistent with the existing development pattern of immediately adjacent homes
and other homes located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue. The proposed
residence complies with Code height requirements.
6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
The relief requested as to the CCCL setback will not have a visual impact
because the distance from the CCCL to the platted rear property line is over 32
feet and the distance from the rear property line to the Mean High Water Line is
over 400 feet. The design of the pool is consistent with the adjacent coastal
architectural style of the residence and homes north and south of the property.
Residential Infill Project Criteria
1) The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity
and development standards.
The previously existing seawall along the CCCL was non-functioning and has
been removed so the proposed pool does not impact the seawall. It is
impractical to construct the residence, meeting current Code requirements as to
side setbacks and height, without the requested front and rear/CCCL setback
deviations. The imposition of the rear setback to the CCCL significantly reduces
the area on which the residence may be constructed. Compliance with the 25'
front setback, 10' CCCL setback and compliance with Code as to no living area
below base flood elevation makes it impractical to construct a residence of
similar size and character to those in the area.
The applicant is proposing two driveways on Eldorado Avenue for two purposes.
One is to allow adequate access to the two garages on the property as they are
separated by storage area and one driveway will not allow vehicular access to
both garages. The second is that the two driveways will also serve as overflow
parking spaces so that guests of the residence will not have to use street
parking, which would likely impede circulation on Eldorado Avenue.
As described in detail in response to General Applicability Criteria 1, the
proposed front setback and CCCL setback are similar to the setbacks of many
other residences on Eldorado. Setback of 3'-3" on the south for the gate column
will allow proper function and design of the privacy gate. Specifications of the
proposed columns and gate are included on the site plan/building elevations.
4
2) The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties (include the existing value of the site and the proposed
value of the site with the improvements).
The preliminary assessed value of the vacant subject property, according to the
Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office, is $1,256,642. The values of
surrounding parcels vary from $458,000 to $3,420,000, having improvements
ranging in size from 1,917 sq. ft. to 4,262 sq. ft. The higher value parcels are
located on the Gulf, as is the subject property, and are developed. The proposed
construction of a residence on this vacant property will increase the value of the
subject parcel and not negatively impact the abutting parcels.
3) The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in
the City of Clearwater.
A detached dwelling is a permitted use in the LMDR District.
4) The uses or mix of uses within the residential infill project are
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Residential single-family use is compatible with this area of Eldorado Avenue and
North Clearwater Beach.
5) The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
The proposed design of the residence will be of superior architectural design and
construction and will meet existing building code requirements. The proposed
residence is consistent with the architectural style of the neighborhood and with
the pattern of development of the properties along the Gulf of Mexico on north
Clearwater Beach, and will increase the subject property's value, which will have
a positive impact on the adjacent properties and other properties on north
Clearwater Bach that are similarly situated.
6) The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and
function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
The proposed design of the pool and residence blends with the overall theme of
the coastal style of the residence and the neighborhood and is compatible with
the community character and pattern of development of residential estate homes
fronting on the Gulf of Mexico.
5
7) Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The specific flexibility that is requested by the Applicant is
(i) reduction of the rear setback to the Coastal Construction Control Line
in order to accommodate a swimming pool located 3' from the CCCL
and deck located 0' from the CCCL;
(ii) a front setback reduction similar to what was previously approved
(FLS2010-07002) to allow a setback of 5'-5" to building and 3' to stairs;
(iii) and relief to allow a privacy gate column 6' in height located 3'-3" from
the side (southerly) property line.
As previously discussed, similar relief to the CCCL setback has been granted to
other lots on North Clearwater Beach, which front on the Gulf of Mexico and are
negatively impacted by the location of the CCCL. In addition many properties
along the Gulf of Mexico are developed immediately adjacent to the CCCL or
within the minimum CCCL setback and have front setbacks on Eldorado similar
to those proposed. The setback for the gate column will allow proper function of
the gate and will not impede the adjoining property to the south, nor Eldorado
Avenue.
The size of the proposed structure as a result of the setback reductions is not
outside the range of other residences in this area of Eldorado Avenue. Although
the front setback is reduced, the design of the residence provides additional off
street parking spaces such that residents and guests of the home will not need to
park in the Eldorado Avenue right-of-way.
4/15/2011 10:00 AM
52469.120446
#553726 v1 - Cavill/Ex to Res Infill
6
y
40
EXHIBIT "C"
(AS TO CCCL SETBACK)
14 Somerset Street
9 Cambria Street
724 Eldorado Avenue
734 Eldorado Avenue
740 Eldorado Avenue (FLD2009-100)
770 Eldorado Avenue
800 Eldorado Avenue
804 Eldorado Avenue
856 Eldorado Avenue (FLS2008-01003)
880 Mandalay Avenue
920 Eldorado Avenue
926 Eldorado Avenue
944 Eldorado Avenue
946 Eldorado Avenue
956 Eldorado Avenue
964 Eldorado Avenue
970 Eldorado Avenue
1002 Eldorado Avenue
1154 Mandalay Point Road (FLD2009-02004)
1160 Mandalay Point Road (FLD2009-02004)
1170 Mandalay Point Road
1176 Mandalay Point Road
1188 Mandalay Point Road
1192 Mandalay Point Road
1198 Mandalay Point Road
a
Iq 'SOM6'r,",?
i
r U^ Ql)
V J
Map Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
•,? ,_?? tom. a ? ,
T
t a?? ?, }t? .? IL- Scale 1:382
?? 1 y X Coastal RWW Monuments
st
? :,- « / ? ' t ? ? hangs ftADrsamm?f
r i y, j A Wheal MmWnm"
• t CossW Consmicgon Control
• > ? ,? - tines
s ' ... ! Counties
?Ir -! - r Mme.
le*
. a
a?+ N"TEG?
Pb D.WXrh dEmhr.arXr Plaudm pbal?mr.il.Xmy arwEnMpmlXpsC alWwX w?Xa ?a?C
hnllaXab NdaP PmPa•XX a^WX •aX wXMa awq QO ham MnwX
VMY W rung. r1Mlrw.er+,p OdIrW PrhMX a1 Ww. nXVfEO mXa Nm a PaNLX..tiy iS're.wa?. WrmiXw day
YM XiIm? ?di6q.eWbNJ•.n MnWirt+wra,uwd WrXX b.
p?p?, rtl mImM.M•'°W V W SMOIRD TREREFORE VEfLFVi1NV NFdaYTpN TNED FROM
TyIE gfE ?OR R.
q C
,`
S
?J
??
1 514 el dtlezdc
?,,
V
??
(`?
Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
104
l
* J ?? X
?p_,;'
i
Coastal Range Monuments
G RWW MO MMIMt t
vwww MdMMM"
e
coastal c01Kb0000n canaol
- lines
-? coumfts
ism`.
Ao
w
Map Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
Map D
coutal Range Morw w a
Range more Mein
e
MR LWIDWOM110"
e
coastal canswctwn contra
Lines
"'1 counties
r
Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
Coa" Range MWKWOM
G Range Mon nwM
Virtual Monunents
e
Cos" Conduction coma
Lines
t1 Counties
t
? Map Direct
75co nd6veab
t
N a
f Map Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
r"•.r, ?#?- - _? 41, i T _t Ayers '.-
i r{ Scale 1:382
lff^ Coastal Range Monuments
MasmbMs
AWOO?•
h . j . virtual Monwnents
i ?' rr G
i
4k t ! a - ? . C.Oafial CiOrKaUGIOn (++OnV(II
?, i #9! r t , t?` •• Lines
A E Counties
rt
t # ;? • r
• ti
er
14
r _ w d,A - •
N"TE
• Y
FIaiO? epees dfmYUVw•• PraMm OimrY?r. Tln mp artM?n?Ni 0iW m NN4 • f?C ml r rtJtSt UTC
iYr te•biYM'WW??V. `vw?aw?YC Uwg WY6on 31M• mNraE rY•w•waM.Ym Cb?+
1evYd•a Y. ?apNV?. Q•r?•M?`dfer.lUYfiO mMlW Ypcwa?•IS IS'rtl •ilwl ?rgli?ead•M1'
q? ?W?q ?? `/WbIMOILD?an?D??MA'MIY NFOel1w6TNJM 08TKED?
THE $f1E eEFOnE ?CTMO d! R.
I?U s
rnaad-a-L Oj-,?
QL-
C2
Map Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
p scale 1:382
- s Coastal Range Monuffm s
w' ? ?'• c Range MdKOWnn
h4orAffnents
w Coastal • ?? j _ c«KVUctien cOwa
Lines
? Counties
4 r4 14_ PAM
a WR
oil
1 'r -+
,.x n
• S
N AV Q
nnN. p?pro.r.aE?w.rww..lPrrww OYWrr.Rr awry-n Ny Oiruww.a.Fw xn wxxirtc.
nesrwpmme aaww r!nnw.awa.a ya.r.a;n o?i .w+ mrerarcaw+.wra.r?aww+
rr d.oorer..ra be..?+orra atl.. ruv?FO mr e+:. a.?'?9 ?s.w..MOi..pn?.oa?sr a.w
M.;6 Mw.,w W??M?4? O;O ne1 YOU 4SIIOl1L VEIUFY INV RAF ~?Tdl paT. MFROM
TnE SIfE??LiMO ON R.
?7?n
Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
Coastal mange Monuments
e Range Monuments
e Yetusl MaMSneete
_ coastal conswction Control
l1 Counties
Gqq ,- Qq?-, E-: IJW?J o
?.
?'`
?,?'
.?,
1,.
?`.::;
??
q(-Iv o's"Jo
5y
x
r _
q s(.C, F, Idz--c--d()
g?
C
(DQ-7O Eidvv--o- A
C?) quq, c(d&ado
`o
.?
0
O
r?
?J
'
Gl O Q cam? 4} 3 ( ) w, - ,.
?'? cif Odc-a-cio
l oG p
ca e (Jov-o- d-cl
l
c,,- -I- (1(.C MCC/,,dc(- (aA? C4- ? !ck
l
SCI < < o a? ? P4-
Map Direct: Beaches and Coastal Systems
Coastal Range Monuments
Range Manx eMs
n VwW Montxnents
Coastal Constnx ion control
Lines
Counties
C7
3
S
a
0
Q
C5
r PI--e4
?I?CP Mandala,
Ol- D1 ?
4 0--
d
? a ?
cr - ?) . ®r(?
(q - p"larlda, f 1?11? P-- K
l
EXHIBIT "D"
(As to front setback)
1. 920 Eldorado Avenue
2. 936 Eldorado Avenue
3. 946 Eldorado Avenue
4. 974 Eldorado Avenue
5. 1000 Eldorado Avenue
6. 1002 Eldorado Avenue
7. 1020 Eldorado Avenue
8. 1022 Eldorado Avenue
9. 1030 Eldorado Avenue
10. 1046 Eldorado Avenue
11. 1058 Eldorado Avenue
12. 1070 Eldorado Avenue
13. 1078 Eldorado Avenue
14. 1086 Eldorado Avenue
r ?
?w
{
#"*'
f?
f;
J
I
'? I
1 ?
For
AL
.,. ? ,
,,,. ? -- _
. t r
,.
??
?,
L?
tow M
ZONE
bwfru?lEp r u•s;
- ?ij1M?fG41 ?
VAhtR1EUiMi: ?
4,
'
s
js
{ f
?t
.' G
+fit
,1? 1 K
~• i
Af
t
`
\
rr `P f,
i ?
k 4
r
r i t? .
, t5 }
? r .?
• t
I?' { i ? 4
1 y ?1'
11,,
? ,1 i i 111 i1
till
1 11
} 'll
1
r' no. Ill t'.
? tlltt:
} II I ,
}VII ?? 1 DIY
t}, , II d
? ? I f
I I 1
1
t`j ?t ,?
, 71'1
} 1
VI II
14
, 4v
?II,It111"i,{It ?1
t, l _ i
i, 1' I? I 1
,,1
lit
Y 1 VII ',
t'
?t,l V 1 , I
1' {,1 Ij 1,IPll
111 ` ,,{1 S.t
I
I
C, "t
--
r
a
Iflljlil
I / /
s? .'' ?d
M T"
000
__.
? 4 k r_
9, ffly
? 3 m. x
?" JV
i
I
fl.
a,
{ t? ' Yj, y 5 r
•ii l] Y 1? gt., •?
T` a1 f'IL. •K •.? *i
•
' ?•
IT ? •
rY
_ J
{
q
FJ
... : 4rm
a
t +
w
mss{
?A ,
j tig
•......?.. ?:vt
41 11 4
...........
..........
? ?+' Y? ? '?"F .gym..:,. .,., •?`*?'' i .
A . e <,
- N
r
.
1 E?+
Y
,, f'1
LL \?
low
Or f
t- ?
7
of
r=
+..,+ +
m
,K
A,
K
1
i
• `
¦
---q
-;
"V
.
r s .
ram ?
? ?. 1
El ?
i_
a
{ .Y
-tlY.+lVryar?t+.e...
? j
i
r?
wagon
.J ? ( rR r}'t, ? if `rr? ? ?rT' ;. '? .? •y. M'T?
? , d
j
I°
i j
°?i?llll
-Mi
r.
.
- 'ds
.."'_ ^; q r ? ,1?, py?`Y' Y"?: y ? i?v '1?C , y ' y ? y f •? r * ?, x ,
. ?-
-a?`,?-_. .. 1'{ ? , 1'?1 S. `i ?a. `?Vf8 H?`l . fi ?...?,''i?? -:?S.t .s 1:,. Y` a?"..t Mr t ? ? \ ? i . ? ?I?4 PiYi3?rbUt'*?b fS?'? •'??3., 4?' ,rat, i.??•f{
_?,. .,.?.,'.s._ •r ?E;t;.?,: :t? r; ':? ??.'.?, , ?:?? rt.1 c .y,,.i r.k? ? :r, ,e' `!,? ,?t ,_ t 4
,?+--,?- .. !„-•"?,., 'i ;.: '?:'? .,.s .., °?4 ;-' ?,..•_.. ?. z,r,,F ,?W;a ,y .?°"{ ? ?"e ,• -?'? x 1 <y,u ??? .w ?i ?7. r?.. :z• #YE}. '? ?,`: .?^1"..: ? 1? ?=;f,
•,?,., 5. ?. .G...?. r } y;t,?+ ?s:j ' ,,? Y r 2 c'?dtitsY \r •;? ° ?? ,,? ..?, .
.. >.¢.., ?..i'- t. i- ?; :,- .,`ffi .,,:?'. ?. ,e i c• t ?y,,r ,t -tf?v ??1•, i ,14 ,r'''` °:e':M?
? .... .r,?-? ? ,;-' ? a..Y ? '1'C? .L ?? 1• ?,-. ?' ?h y t,, {mr?
° .? -.._ y;.. wj ? ?. ? {?°„?.... ... .-• .. ,.Qie°? .,w1 w. Sar :.J? ,rt<" 3?. - ? '»1? 1,. ? ?,. ?!`i, s?, 1L?e f°A ;,f? r t!`rt xe '? ?, ? .? ,.?r'
:???°. ir._. __ .... s __`d ,.. v_.. ._.,. ,. _ .. ..-e _`i..-.i...l: ,..,,'S",..: .i 5, :.. ?. w.. _ • .1 t.._ .... ..«.1?. ?... ?• _v.. ?, ,. .?.?,.. ?. .. _..,a,??.*?]?;:?.- .?...'t..Y .• ..?. .t._?,_ __???.•,?,._....?... ...L. .. _s.?._._....
Cavill Residence
Site Data Table
Required Proposed
Dwelling Units 1 1
Lot Area 5,000 sq. ft. 12,759 sq. ft.
Lot Width 50' 110'
Gross Floor Area 5,103.6 sq. ft. [FAR.40] 4,215 sq. ft.
Front Setback 25' 5'-5" (Building)
3' (Stairs)
Side (North) Setback 5' 8'-4" (Building)
10'-10" (Pool Deck)
Side (South) Setback 5' 26'-2" (Building)
5'-2" (Pavement)
3'-3" (6' High Gate Column)
Rear Setback to CCCL 10' 20'-1" (Building)
0' (Pool Deck)
3' (Pool)
Parking Spaces 2 3
Impervious Area 8,293 sq. ft. [Max. ISR.65] 5,343 sq. ft.[ISR.418]
Height Max. 30' 29'-11" above B.F.E.
#554022 vl - Cavill Site Data Table
4aes
?PPROXIM,TE EOOE OF WA1ER OF 114E GULF a
OF MEXICO PLAT
8Wr'IDARY /
NO STRUCTURE MAY BE
INSTALLED ON INDICATED AREAS '
OTHER THAN 48" MAX HEIGHT
LANDSCAPE AND/OR NON-OPAQUE
FENCE NOT EXCEEDING 48"H
12"
If PALM `?S^l 6.89
4" TO PAIAI
o POOL
h DECK
Q 6' PAU?
3' TO
d POOL
'7 q Ov ^)
' ` Iv ti? I p
01
VO STRUCTURE MAY BE
NSTALLED ON INDICATED AREAS o=ym N POOL
DTHER THAN 48" MAX HEIGHT Q v
_ANDSCAPE AND/OR NON-OPAQUE o *W PALM - 4
=ENCE NOT EXCEEDING 48"H oQ e,
as
1O'H ARBOR
Y^? '??,!aey 'r W/ FREE
STANDING F.P.
PALM
2 1- 5" TO
OOL DEC
ad 6 0' HALM
5'-
SET
BACK
T/5
it .
I6 ?
"lr
ar
lir r8 ` i
ri PROPOSED
r it
rr
eUr? prNc a as r
?M CH.
ATF RM @ `
R' 3'-0 BFE
6,s? r ? ? II
O 1 ?/ I
r
FIQ
S 1 /2 OF
LOT 3
ONE VE
E?EV.,13 oa
Qpp?
8 4S Y8p4I.? \
'B99p°F , L0'4Rr
s Ip A4?rp4
t ti.o w'?Ra?y
o ry?
?? Q N,BB RE' fp
5BJo jp AEo
?, o (M)>rR? 1r PALM
/ sfr QA?k?``
\ 6.5
3 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
ELEOyN 13 OoE
JAI \k?
0
Y\
r
?I
1
ti
ti
2 ?
& BRICK P"QRKINC
r
' JpA
r
r
•aa
r
SAM ARY r LINE LEGEND:
% OLE / CENTERLINE-
BOUN04RY LINE---
BUILDING LINE --I
rq as
PLAT LOT LINE----&
r, 1
EASEMENT LINE---i
?r
C14AIN LINK
WIRE FENEE=j,
BUILD
5'-0" 1* PALM
SET"919
r BACK
4I
3 . ' -0"
0"
r STAIR
Ir ? 5
'_3"
6T, LID
P
•a O P
,z
J • r 4'<'
j
9• PAUL
? al
?4.6s
bg
boo
4'6.7
J?
SHADED AREA REPRESENTS AREA
OF TROPICAL PLANTS
SITE PLAN
SCALE-1" =20'-0"
SITE AREA TABULATION 1 DWELLING
PAVER POOL DECK AREA 1,751 SQ. FT.
PAVER PARKING AREAS (2 TOTAL 2 REQUIRED) 1,009 SQ. FT.
PAVER WALKWAYS 51 SQ. FT.
TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT 2,532 SQ. FT.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA
TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA
(•5,343 SQ. FT.
12,759 SQ. FT.
41.8% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS RATIO
o
Lu u
3
N J
ma -- d
C
a
to
0
0
13
Wt
?0
0 Z
cc
0 w
M I W
DRAWN BY- TJCR
CHECK BY- GLO
JOB#
10.156
DATE
02/18/11
DATE REV.
04/20/ 1 1
SCALE
?BID SET
?PERMITTINIS SET
,PRELIMINARY BET
PAGE
1
OF 9
E-? lu"A iN
N
0, V
88b
°
Z= uj
?? a w
=u J
jr- inry
m a
N
< N
rwo.=, s€ 6 n
=z?
N m ry7a?
J
4
0! V
C3 LL
PC W
m
W
;0? W
?
_
El
N Q Q
3
Z ?
W
N
W ? V
0 W
0!
Z ?
? Q
? D
a
W h o
0!
d ? J
W
_ Rol*A7r &DX OF WATMor 7n,
-- "oXo PLAr
ftftARY
NO STRUCTURE MAY BE
INSTALLED ON INDICATED AREAS
OTHER THAN 48" MAX HEIGHT
LANDSCAPE AND/OR NON-OPAQUE
FENCE NOT EXCEEDING 48"H -?
CNorth
STRUCTURE MAY BE
STALLED ON INDICATED AREAS
'HER THAN 48" MAX HEIGHT
,NDSCAPE AND/OR NON-OPAQUE
NCE NOT EXCEEDING 48"H
v
Q
,? ZONE ?E
6S. S 3.00
1r P Jr
h
Ir Puy, Opp
/
PALM
CC, I
4
JCS oY
J ? 3
M R
m, e Q? N '
h #e' PALM
81
10'H ARBOR
W/ FREE
STANDING F.P.
PALM
32" ?3 6
,
'12" PA?
/
13 -0 OFF-
S.
r10.00.
S 1/2 OF '1r
LOT 3 PALM
PINE BARK
MULCHED BEDS
17' PALM
PALM
POOL
PROPOSED
3 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
MECH.
•. ;;;' N7 PLATFORM
I
vo
?d
W
go
hO
h
" PALM
& BRICK PARKING
. '
?
04(
j ?O
LINE LEGEND:
/CENTERJNE--?
BOUNDARY LINE---
BUILDING LINE -?
PLAT LOT LINE-%
EASEMENT LINE---
POWER 1?NE--
WIRE FENCE—%
a'
W4 OOD ZONE LINE—%
SHADED AREA REPRESENTS AREA
/L\ OF TROPICAL PLANTS
INDICATES EXISTING PALMS
90
Q
0P
P
Q
?V
TREE LEGEND
12" ROYAL PALM
"
a 0 6" FOXTAIL PALM
3 GAL. SEA GRAPE
3 GAL WHITE BIRD
0 3 GAL.. CARDBOARD PALM
/',/ ST AUGUSRNE SOD
® BEACH SUNFLOWER
W PALM /
r
'4'49
,4,82
84
2
/A
'ot OF tr
LAND,SGAFE FLAN
SCALE-111=201-0'1
ro
A
m
0 ?
W L)
N
Z J
?
m° - a
n? W o
0
t0
_
U 0 Z w
C C r
? z
M:8
U) 4) r
n :i
A
M C
U) Y/
0 n
?o N
DRAWN BY-TJG
CHECK BY- GLB
JOB#
10-1 56
DATE
02/18/11
DATE REV.
04/13/11
SCALE
1 11=20 1.0 11
?BID SET
[]PERMITTING SET
.PRELIMINARY SET
PAGE
Z
OF 9
ro
to
5
N
(=3 uj
N Ia:
0
d
? J
? a
a. _
Q
w
J
a
a
_$il z
? m 2wIL
r, aU?
W J
LL
U
13
? ? W
W PC m
I
W W
v
N
Z ?
Q
ED
UI ?
? J
U
W
0 •?
W
} ? Q
Z
?
J
W
? O
d'
CL
? p
J
W
I
I
I
n
D
r
T
?P-
4
1T
r
17>-
z
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
¦
??
,11 13 m
m N
C 3?
J
'til IA Q Q
N
-+ _
m
D
W Q
Z
II D
J m o
j D
r L
7C
2
t0 m > o .A
- m Ed
M
M
to
-mt
,
, m
m ,
793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
Dunedin, Florida 34698
r
SHOREIINES
DESIGN CROUP, L? C
727-736-UNE (5463) \
est. 1983
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavi*11 Residence
ELDORADO AVE. CLEARWATER BEACH, FL.
r
O UAl N
r- r
m
< r ?' W
J
U
m 0
D -
D
9)
r
D
A aN
o? O
z
N
Q
-fl
r
-rr
r
Q
70
r
Z
¦ ? ?
M I?
r
3 m
M ?
D ?
N
-.&
m
2
r]
D
p _ IF "'
IR O
j
D 0
O L
;AK
Z
Q
t0 m z
o D
r W ;11 i
-
m ;
m 3
m
PI
O <
GI
L
r !
M
I
793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
Dunedin, Florida 34698
SHORE IVES
DESIGN GROUP. Lc
727-736-LINE (5483)
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavill Residence
DORADO AVE. CLEARWATER BEACH, FL.
EL
1 CERTIFY THAT I .HAVE. FOVIENIED THE.
PLANS AND DETEFUNED THAT THEY H
COMPLIANCE V04 CHAPTER 18 STRUC'
F.B.C. 2007 INCLUDING 2008-2gp?
ELECTRICAL OR PLUMBING CORP{Ndi
ENGINEER
PAUL E. HA YN5
E.
CONSULTING NGIN
1280 HEATHFkEiIL DUNEDIN l`
VOI?E't?27 7 9025
ON
r
APR 2011
PAUL E. HAGLER, FPE 20158
x
A
r
m
m -?
r
O
O
x
-------------*
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a I
? i \1
1
ncr. 1
A i
one _ 1
?? Cl
0 ? X° m m O
'P ° O
N
1 > (
I L A Z
U
m
D z
W
;0
m
''
Ul
1P
rq -41
r, C.
i
i c
x
Y
93 San Christopher Dr Suite D
7
Dunedin, Florida 34698
SHORE 1 N ES
DES1GN GROUP, LC
727-X36-LIME (5463) SUL 1583
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavi'911 Residence
ELDORADO AVE. CLEARWATER BEACH, FL.
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE STRUCTUR SCRIBED ON TH E
PLANS AND DETERMINED THAT THEY HAVE GNED TO
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 16 STRU R EN
FEt.C. 2007 INCLImING 2008-2 NO
ELECTRICAL OR PLUMBING C IN IN TIFICATION
ENGINEER
PAUL E.. HA E w e ?? f
VDDUNEDINV SULTING VN014 ///???? '-
0 HEATHER f?
7 -9025 APR 2 0 2011
PAUL E. HAGLER, FPE 20158
-TT
D O
ITT
m
r -
m
O
t•?D Z O O 1 °?
"q ;Pal mm
m 13
m
a
N o:
p m D
w L ;K Z
to In > O r
y m m m
N 'f <
A ? _
., m ?
r
MM
793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
Dunedin, Florida 34698
SHORE Et N ES
DESIGN GROUP, LC
727-73&LINE (5463) est. 1983
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavi*ill Residence
E LD O RAD O AVE. C LEARWATE R BEACH, FL.
1 CERTIFY THATI HAVE REVIEWED THE STRUCTUREGLA
FLANS AND DETERMNED THAT THEY H?fVE GNCOMPLIANCE WATH CHAPTER 16 STRUCTUf9A EN F.B.C. 21007 INCLUDING 200$ NO ELECTRICAL OR PLW187NG CO'WVjVW INCL I ENGINEER
PAUL E. HA CONSULTING ftNGIN
1280 'HER. RI
APR 2 0 2011
PAUL E. HAGLER, FPE 20158
II
tt
t
u
c
r
n
0
i
e
¦?
m
3 m
l
t ED 0
D 0
N
0 1 x
E m D p Z
m
r
m W
m m
U %
O-
j
1
r L
-
4
793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
Dunedin. Florida 34698
SHORELNES
DESIGN GROUP, LC
777-730-LINE (54W) est ,983
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavi*11 Residence
ELDORADO AVE. CL.EARWATER BEACH, FL.
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE STRUCIUR CRIBED ON TH
PLANS AND DETERMINED THAT THEY HAVE B GNED TO
COMPLIANCE MATH CHAPTER 16 STROC ENM 41C
F.&C. 2007 INCLUDING 2008- . 90
ELECTRICAL OR PLUMBING C ld IN TIFlCATION
ENGINEER
VC:
PAUL E HA
E..
?
CONSULTING GIN ,
1280 HEATHER 8L
DUNE IN F 6
Vol 27 7 -9025
APR 2.0 2011
PAUL E. HAGLER, FPE 20158
m
Yp
V
mi
{
D
??
¦
o ,1011
,n
; m
M o
D o
N
;D =
m
a X
D
g
G7
z > P,
Ed o
.
(B 13
,
m
m
tD m o m
X!
m M
M
U1
t
m -A -A L
-? ?
?.
GI
' 793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
Dunedin, Florida 34698
SHOREIINES
DESIGN GROUP, LC
727-736-UN= (5463) 1.t• 1983
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavi*11 Residence
ELDORADO AVE. CLEARWATER BEACH, FL.
-I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE STR%ACTUR ... BED ON TH
PLANS AND DETERMINED THAT THEY'NAVE B GNED MD
COMPUANCE WTH CHAPTER 16 STRUC F
T?
j
T
4
F.B.C. 2007 INCLUDING 2008- A
L
7Y0
% C
1
;
ELECTRICAL OR PLUMING IN IN 1 TIFlCATION
[ENGINEER 0
L E. HA E.
SULTING GI
0 HEATHER BL
EOIN FI APR 2 2011
?F22 7 -9025
{(vv}} PAUL E. HAGLER, FPE 20158
n
D
r
m
o?
A
?M
Q
z
¦??
1r 'G m 3 m 0
n 0 0
Di
c
zI
a
1
d
n
-1
j n J
> r-
m E
m ? m
Ui
m
PI 0 <
?
I L M
793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
G1
Dunedin, Florida 34698
SHORE II N ES
DESIGN GROUP, LLC
727 736-LINE (5463) est. 1983
PRELIMINARY DESIGN SCHEME FOR:
The Cavi*11 Residence
ELDORADO AVE. CLEARWATER BEACH, FL.
1 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEVED THE SIRIICTU ESCRIBED ON TH
PLANS AND DETERMINED THAT THEY HAVE GNED TO
COMP zoo C iN TH CHA TER 16 SMG . NO CAL-
FlECTRICAL OR PLUMBMIO INCL IN 'RTIFlCA110N
ENGINEER 0 /
PAUL E. HA E. l_
CONSULTING GIN28L
i1280 HEATHER
APR 2 0 2011
PAUL E. HAGLER, FPE 20158
C<=WILL F:?€EXTEF?IOR COLCR 5Ck4Et"'-1E
SW 7727
SMOOTH SAND FINISH Koi Pond
STUGGO SHERWIN WILLIAMS KOI FOND *5W -1-12-1
FASCIA, COLUMNS,
RAILINGS $
RESTORATION SOF
5I4ERIUIN IUILLIAM5
DOVER WkTE *SW X385
SW 6385
Dover White
GARAGE DOORS 4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ENTRY DOOR Hawthorne SW 3518
"WOOD5CAFE5" HAWTHORNE *5W 3515
EAGLE ROOFING FLAT CEMENT TILE
ROOF MATERIAL "BELLEAIR" KING'S GAN1'ON 04043
793 San Christopher Dr Suite D
Dunedin, Florida 34698
www.sdgfl.com
SHORE LL"-- Fa
OE$IGN GRQIJP, LLG
I- L 1983 727-736-LINE (5463)
OWEN5 CORNING .. F- 1
CULTURED STONE VENEER "COUNTRY LEDGESTONE" cHARDONNAY *2000(0 ?F
Storm Water Narrative for
Cavill Residence Clearwater Beach, Florida
The relief that is requested as to setbacks, including the 0' rear setback to the CCCL, does
not alter the lots' natural rainwater runoff. Existing runoff toward the street and adjacent
culverts is not impeded, nor redirected.
#554023 vl
I#': 201Gt344760 BK: 17110 PG: 648, 12/08/2010
$27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $11130.00 KEN
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM08
4 0-4
Prepared by: '
Kenneth G. Arsenault, Jr.
Title Agency of Florida, Trig.
19535 Gulf Boulevard, Suite C
Indian Shores, Florida 3378S.
Parcel ID 05I29/15/54666/069/0040
File Number. 10-0287
THIS INDENTURE, made this ? day of
ELDORADO-PHILLIPS, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED
to MICHAELCAVILL. A MARRIED MAN. bevd)ufb
at 04:46 PM, RECORDING 3 PAGES
BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
t ` J'x'r 2810, between 1000
Y C NY, hereinafter called the Grantor,
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the srtm of Tea Dollars (S 10.00), and other good and
valuable considerations, the receipt and sufft67epcyof\vhich is hose y acknowledged, by these presents does grant,
bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, enforce canvby arld 8on5arf ur(tto the Grantee, all that certain parcel of land
lying and being in the County of Pine#La State of Florida ltnott particularly described as follows:
SEE EXHIBTf 'A' ATTACHBD`IiEI;ETO AND `MADE A PART HEREOF
SUBJECT TO TAXES FOtt TH'1jEAR20,1 BAND SUBSEQUENT YEARS
SUBJECT TO RESTRICITODTS/KND EASEkENTS OF RECORD.
TO HAVE AND 7V J46Jb\l the same in fee simple forever.
and t WCvrantor hereby covinimts with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that
Grantor''ha* good right &*lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that Grantor hereby fully warrants the
ti0e to said 4e4 and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all Persons whomsoever, and that said land
` j is 5tee o7alFemc4bmnces.
WARRANTY DEIV? `
8
Page 1 of 2
P1ftLLA9 COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17110 PG 649
,
Page 2 of 2
Continuation of signature page for deed between 1000 ELDORADO-PHILLIPS, `L.LC,_A FLORIDA
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY as Grantor and MICHAEL. CAVILL, A MARRIED MAN, as Grantee for that
certain real property haiye a street address of 984 Eldorado Avenue, Clearwater Brach, Florida,33767
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto sot, Grantors, hand iind,seal the day and year first
above-written.
SIGNED SEALED AND DELIVERED `
IN OUR PRESENCE: . , ;
7000 ECDORA TX)-PHILLIPS LLC_ A FLORIDA LIMITED
"IL'I•Y e0MPANY
BY: )3ORTH STAR REALTY SERVICES, LLC, AN
ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
BY: NORTH STAR DEFERRED EXCHANGE CORP.,
L . ` AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, SOLE
-- ci'z-
BY- IVA, ` . ; ACQ LINE ESHALAS SR VICE-
P IBY:
- - AS VICE-PRESIDENT
STA3EOF ll[II1/0I s
. CDUN?Y?OF
The ?brcgoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a ` klday of 0 2010 by
jAf2QUELINE ESHA, AS SR. VICE-PRESIDENT AND KEVIN KETE AS VICE-PRESIDENT OF NORTH
` -_ ;Sr14AR DEFERRED EXCHANGE CORP., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AS SOLE MEMBER OF NORTH
STAR REALTY SERVICES, LLC, AN ILLINOIS LMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS MANAGER OF 1000
EJ.?ORADO-P UPS,?FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, who produced
as identification.
J7
OPPIgAI.?J?I. Notary Pubbto
8UFIHI" D. Mda?e?y My commission
NolerY PttblO-8tliof IOM
My Commlaabn Bon Jon ie4 ama
1
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17110 PG 650
Exhibit "A"
A portion of Lot 3, all of Lot 4 and a portion of Lot 5, Block 69, Mandalay, according to the map or plat-
thereof as recorded In Plat Book 14, pages 32 through 35 Inclusive, of the Public Records of Pinellas - ' - -
County, Florida, being further described as follows: ;' -
Commence at the Northwesterly comer of Lot 4, Block 62 of said subdivision; thence along the'%utherlY
right of way of Island Drive extended N. 65058'30"W., 60.00 feet to the Northeasterly corner d AW1.dt
5; thence Southerly along the Westerly right of way of Eldorado Avenue, said right of way-1561]ng,dbf?Aed
by a curve concaved Southeasterly, having a length of 30.01 feet, a radius of 2645.50 f4et, a chp1???,`,
bearing and distance of.'S. 22030'42" W., 30.01 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence leaving saiq fight of
way N. 65058'30"W., 110.03 feet along the Southerly boundary of land as described In`,V orrantyD,bed
to'the
recorded In Official Records Book 16990, Page 1299, Public Records of Pinellas Pdli +, Florida, ,
Westerly boundary of said Lot 5; thence Southerly along said Westerly boundgt7 of Lot 5, rtd-the Westerly
boundaries of said Lots 4 and 3, along a curve concaved Southeasterly, having? a length of,119.60 feet, a
radius of 2755.50 feet, a chord bearing and distance of S. 21001'33" W., 119.gVfeet to,a point which is
the Southwesterly corner of the North 1/2 of said Lot 3; thence leaving said Westerlytoundary of Lot 3,
S. 69043123" E, along the South boundary of the North 1/2 of said I of 3, 110.00 feet to the Westerly right
of way of Eldorado Avenue; thence along said Westerly right of wake being defined by a curve concaved
Southeasterly, having a length of 112.41 feet, a radius of 2645.50 feet; a chord,-bearing and distance of N.
20058'10" E., 112.40 feet to the Point of Beginning.