The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2011-02005; 401 CORONADO DR; CORONADO PARKING LOTA FLD2011-02005 401 CORONADO DR Date Received: 2/1/201110:30:46 AM Coronado Parking Lot ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner 11 CDB Meeting Date: April 19, 2011 Case Number: FLD2011-02005 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owner/Applicant: Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd Representative: Frontier Engineering Inc Addresses: 401 Coronado Drive & 406 Hamden Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a minimum lot area of 19,800 square feet, a lot width of 60 feet (along Coronado Drive), a lot width of 219 feet (along Fifth Street), a lot width of 121.5 feet (along Hamden Drive), a front (west) setback of 33.4 feet, front (north) setbacks of 7.5 feet and 12.5 feet, a front (east) setback of 15.1 feet and 10.2 feet, a side (south) setback of 6 feet, side (west) setbacks of 4.5 feet and a side (south) setback of 5.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and a reduction of interior landscape standards from 10% to 0% as no groundcover, 50% shrubs or one tree per 150 square feet of greenspace is proposed, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.E. ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist (T) District FUTURE LAND USE PLANT CATEGORY: Res.dent.al Fac.l:t.es Nigh (R FN) PROPERTY USE: Current: Vacant land Proposed: Off-street parking lot EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District SURROUNDING Vacant land ZONING AND USES: South: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations East: Tourist (T) District Attached Dwellings West: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.45 acres is located on the south side of Fifth Street between Coronado and Hamden Drives. The site is a corner lot with dimensions of 110 feet by 150 feet. The site is currently vacant land. The property located directly across the Fifth Street is also a vacant property. Properties to the north, west and south are developed with overnight accommodation uses. The property to the east along Hamden Drive consists of condominiums. Community Development Board - April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 1 of 8 Development Proposal: The proposal includes construction of a surface parking area for 28 vehicles. The applicant wishes to bring the property back into commerce rather than let it lie vacant and proposes this parking lot to be a temporary solution. The property is located in the Small Motel District of the Beach by Design Special Area Plan, an area dominated by businesses that do not have adequate parking facilities to meet the needs of visitors. The parking lot will have two driveways, one onto Fifth Street and the other onto Hamden Drive. The parking lot will be a pay parking lot that will operate 24 hours a day. Customers will pay for use of the parking lot at the front counter of the Gulf Beach Inn located at 415 Coronado Drive. The point of payment was originally proposed on- site at a pay station along Coronado Drive, as shown on the submitted site plan. Staff was made aware of this change after the Development Review Committee meeting. However, staff believes the on-site pay station should remain a part of this development proposal. The street sidewalk leading to the Gulf Beach Inn along Coronado Drive or the Inns entrance may not meet current ADA standards. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum FAR for properties with a designation of Residential Facilities High is 1.0. There are no buildings proposed for this development. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.61, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, Table 2-802 shows that the minimum lot area for off-street parking lots in the Tourist (T) District is 20,000 square feet. The subject lot area is 19,800 square feet (0.45 acres), which is less than the Code provision. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for off-street parking lots in the T District is 100 feet. The lot width along Coronado Drive is 60 feet, while the lot width along Fifth Street and Hamden Street is 219 feet and 121.5, respectively. The proposal does not meet this Code provision along Coronado Drive yet exceeds the Code provision along both Hamden Drive and Fifth Street. For these insufficiencies in lot area and width, it was necessary to process this request as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-803, there are no minimum setbacks for a Comprehen- sive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, as a point of comparison, parking lot front setbacks can range from 25 to 15 feet; and a side setback must be 10 feet. The applicant asks for flexibility from the minimum setbacks for front (north along Fifth Street) setbacks of 7.5 and 12.5 feet, front (east along Hamden Drive) setbacks of 10.2 feet and 15.1 feet, a side (south) setback of 6 feet, a side (west) setback of 4.5 feet, and a side (south) setback of 5.5 feet. The reduced setbacks will allow for an improved design that is compliant with the parking lot standards for parking stalls, drive aisles, and driveways set forth in Section 3-1402 of the CDC. This development recognizes a need for additional public parking lots in an area dominated by non-conforming motels in need of parking spaces. Community Development Board -April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 2 of 8 Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum required building height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. A parking garage or lot is permitted a maximum building height of fifty feet. However, no buildings are proposed for this project. Minimum Off-street Parking: According to Table 2-802 and 2-803 there is no minimum required number of off- street parking spaces for the proposed use. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards intersections with Coronado Drive, Fifth Street, and Hamden Drive, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meet this requirement. Solid Waste: The proposal includes the provision of a trash receptacle at the west end of the parking lot along Coronado Drive. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Landscaping: This property is located in the Tourist District and as such, it is exempt from standard perimeter buffering landscaping. However, the property is subject to the design guidelines for parking areas in the Beach by Design and Section 3-1201.E., interior landscaping standards, of the CDC. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Develop- ment Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is x automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The applicant is requesting a reduction from 10% to 0% in the interior landscaping requirements for a parking lot. The landscape plan shows that 1,137 square feet of interior landscape Community Development Board -April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 3 of 8 greenspace (10% of the Vehicle Use Area) will be provided; however, this space will not be landscaped with the required 1 tree per 150 square feet of greenspace, 50% coverage of shrubs, and groundcover per Section 3-1202.E.1. No trees, shrubs or groundcover is shown on the submitted landscape plan within the interior landscape islands. Two shade trees (live oaks) are proposed at the corner of Hamden Drive and Fifth Street. The staff believes to increase the landscape coverage one oak tree should be planted as shown on the landscape plan and the other should be planted within one interior parking lot island. An interior island with sufficient width to provide the required minimum of five feet from any impervious area should allow the tree to flourish. The staff also believes the applicant should provide adequate groundcover on each side of both driveways and within each interior island to enhance the view of the parking lot from the street. If such landscaping is installed in the sight visibility triangle it shall be compliant Section 3-904.A. of the CDC. Furthermore, no curbs are proposed. Pursuant to Section 3-1204.D. of the CDC, curbing shall be installed along the interior perimeter of the parking lot to ensure all landscaping will be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic. In Addition, the Beach by Design guidelines for parking lots require a well-defined street boundary where the parking areas will be separated from public rights-of-way by a landscaped decorative wall, fence or other opaque landscape treatment of not less than three feet and not more than three and one-half feet in height. The submitted comprehensive landscape plan proposes to incorporate the features of the Beach by Design guidelines as described above. A three foot tall oleander hedge will be planted along the perimeter of the property to buffer the parking lot from street view. This vegetative buffer will consist of a continuous row of oleander shrubs that flower nine months of the year and will be dense enough to buffer the parking lot form street view. This plant material is hardy, drought tolerant and salt tolerant. In addition, to the vegetative buffer, two existing palms will be preserved and, as mentioned above, two shade trees (live oaks) will be planted as well. As stated above, the staff recommends that in order to adequately protect the hedge along the perimeter of the parking lot as shown on the plan, that curbing be installed to protect and maintain the landscape materials from vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Although this parking lot and landscaping treatment is proposed as a temporary use, the additional landscaping and curbing recommended by staff will provide an improved site design that is in keeping with the objectives of the Beach by Design Plan and the interior landscaping standards of the CDC. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is no outstanding enforcement issue associated with this site. Community Development Board - April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 4 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Table 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent FAR 1.0 N/A X ISR 0.95 0.60 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 19,800 square feet (0.45 acres) X Minimum Lot Width N/A North: 146.79 feet X East: 219 feet X South: 89.77 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A North: 7.5 feet (to pavement) X 12.5 feet (to pavement) East: 10.2 feet (to pavement) X 15.1 feet (to pavement) West: 33.4 feet (to pavement) X Side: N/A South: 6 feet (to pavement) X 5.5 feet (to pavement) West: 4.5 feet (to pavement) X Maximum Height N/A N/A X Minimum Determined by the 28 off-street parking spaces X Off-Street Parking Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards Community Development Board -April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 5 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designa- tion; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preserva- tion of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses per- mitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the follow- ing design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board -April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 6 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 3, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.45 acre subject property is located on the south side of Fifth Street between Coronado and Hamden Drives; 2. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Residential Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. The subject property is located within the Small Motel District of the Beach by Design Special Area Plan; 4. The proposal is to construct a 28-space pay public parking lot; 5. The lot area is 19,800 square feet, which requires flexibility from the 20,000 square feet required; 6. The proposal includes flexibility in the lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, front (north along Fifth Street) setbacks of 7.5 and 12.5 feet, front (east along Hamden Drive) setbacks from of 15.1 feet and 10.2 feet, a side (south) setback of 6 feet, a side (west) setback of 4.5 feet, and a side (south) setback of 5.5 feet; 7. The setbacks flexibility will allow for the construction of a parking lot that is compliant with the parking lot standards; 8. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed public parking on the beach; and 9. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803; Community Development Board -April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 7 of 8 2. That the proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2-803.C; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; 4. That the proposal is consistent with the criteria of the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the proposal is consistent with the objectives of the Beach by Design Special Area Plan. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a minimum lot area of 19,800 square feet, a lot width of 60 feet (along Coronado Drive), a lot width of 219 feet (along Fifth Street), a lot width of 121.5 feet (along Hamden Drive), a front (west) setback of 33.4 feet, front (north) setbacks of 7.5 feet and 12.5 feet, a front (cast) setback of 15.1 feet and 10.2 feet, a side (south) setback of 6 feet, side (west) setbacks of 4.5 feet and a side (south) setback of 5.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and a reduction of interior landscape standards from 10% to 5% as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the pay station be installed on-site in the location shown on the submitted site plan and be the means used for the operation of the parking lot; 2. That groundcover landscaping be provided at the parking lot driveways along Fifth Street and Hamden Drive to soften the view of the paved area on adjacent properties; 3. That groundcover be planted within all interior landscape islands consistent with the requirements of the CDC Section 3-1202.E.1; 4. That one proposed shade tree (live oak) be planted within an interior landscape island consistent with the requirements of the CDC Section 3-1202.E.1; 5. That the interior perimeter of the parking lot be curbed to protect the landscaping from vehicular and pedestrian traffic as set forth in CDC Section 3-1204.D; 6. That a revised Comprehensive landscape plan be approved by staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7. That a right-of-way use permit from the Engineering Department be obtained prior to the issuance of any permits for landscaping or construction work within the right-of-way. Prepared by Planning & Development Dept. Staff: Ke ' Nurnberger, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: IPla niing Departni en tlC D BIFLEX (FLD) IPending casesI Up for the next CDBICoronado 401 Coronado Parking Lot (T) 2011.xx - KWMCoronado 401 Staff Report. docx Community Development Board - April 19, 2011 FLD2011-02005 - Page 8 of 8 Kevin Nurnberger 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562- kevin.nurnber er ,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2010 to March 2011 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Assist public customers at the Zoning Counter. Review Building permits Business tax receipts and Landscape plans. Planner I County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Manage case load of planning applications and conduct site visits. I met with residents and neighborhood organizations regarding new existing residential development projects as directed. I led pre-application meetings with residents, contractors and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 I helped to enforce Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. I assisted on site during the archeological process though out the pre- development stage. Development Planner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Assisted the Cultural Resources Manager in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects. Reviewed site plans to ensure protection of historic properties. Supervised and participated in historical surveys and research in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation planning and the Federal installations and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. I developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, comprehensive plans. The Virginia Department of Transportation plan and Virginia Power's public utility plan. I acted as a resource to the community to educate them on the matter of historic preservation. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, LA 2000 to 2005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Evaluated zoning and subdivision applications prepared and presented preliminary staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. I participated in the community and neighbourhood workshops that focused on remapping and rezoning portions of the city in support of the proposed new Comprehensive zoning ordinance. EDUCATION University of New Orleans, LA MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004) State University of New York at Buffalo, NY BA Anthropology (1999) O Causeway Blvd m i DEVO m a 0 SECOND OF`O ? ST ? DR THIRD 3 ST W O CY Q Q J ZQ O O a 8R'?.iGHr WATER DR FIFTH U) W BAYSIDE 2 ?R PROJECT SITE \ c, $q ? g+rVD 0 S ?CF {? g?VD r S? A `A SS LOCATION Owner: Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. Case: FLD201 1-02005 Site: 401 Coronado Drive & 406 Hamden Drive Property Size: .45 acre PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 325 326 3 J33 327 L 325 331 330 a 3 333 332 333 B 333 347 TER pR 341 0 347 343 342 Q 345 ° 345 o 0 A 3 . 51 348 346 Q 347 Q N Q + 355 353 348 Q 5 F O ? IFTH ST S/R O Q ? V 350 1. 0 401 401 P 406 4 DCTR 11 8 405 411 T 409 410 $ 415 o 0 410 420 ^ N 412 421 4,20 415 BAYS/D'DR azo 431 421 of 430 422 w r< 431A 433 430 431 Ap5 P ?o 650 445 /R ZONING Owner: Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. Case: FLD2011-02005 Site: 401 Coronado Drive & 406 Hamden Drive Property Size: .45 acre PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 - _ 1 64 ? 5 26 //\\ 3 3A r- 19 f p - _ 33? - _ 32aS 113 60 r- L 65910 4 330 - ? 4A L 31J - 20 - - - / 114 e o - 66 1 - - 3339 5 332 70 ? z - 21 - 333 115 10 6 333 7 1 56 - - - - 67 - - 116 - 01 - - 22 - - 347 - .. o A 1 1 h 6 0 68 117 ? 23 ' - 34343 11 ' 3 BR/GHT-, , rYA ?R 69 12 18 Q 7 345 345 w - - -4 - 351 70 119 348 Q a 348 1 932 ?? w 0 347 I 2 2 I 3 - 25 3 - 35,41 120 0 3s3 13 9 3 60 45 1 4 1 5 6 1 - - 26 o FIFTH ST V 14 10 A - - - 3s0 50 _ OA r - 0 261/2 401 r- ? 06445' 72 121 - - ?-- _1 - - - - - 401 8 17640 27 -/ 1 40 L467W 122 12 408 - - 28 411 4052 - - A 88438 J 11 74 - _ - - - - - - - - 409 124 g 75 1- - 10 41p 1 2 29 - - - 1`_- 3 - - - - - 41 76 1 125 - 41176 1 $ o o b 4 5 /1 77? 420 9 i- - 4 30 41 - - Q $ NN ?l A J) - - - 421 n 1126 _ 5 s 4?o W 415 BAYS/DE DR I 7?/o .. 78 127 420 "" 2 w A 1 1 43" I / 1 1 N 79 128 430 422 6 q?1 3 1 2 1 ? 32 m 1A 1 4 43 " 1 90 129 413 1 5 1 6 7 8 3- 81 430 431 so L 17640 r " 34 1- - 04950 cy - --1 " i 68280 / / i / N 35 133 L ? i i 36 AAA \ /134 / gar i\135 + \ / / 88 / \ Ah? / 4q? 87 / 9 7 EXISTING USE Owner: Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. Case: FLD2011-02005 Site: 401 Coronado Drive & 406 Hamden Drive Property Size: .45 acre PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 Looking N from subject property along Coronado Drive at vacant parcel and surrounding uses. aYG _ 401 Coronado Drive FLD2011-02005 Looking W from subject property along Fifth Street toward Coronado Drive. Looking S along Hamden Drive at subject property and adjacent use. Looking W on Hamden Drive at subject property toward Coronado Drive and surrounding development Looking E at subject property from Coronado Drive. Looking S along Coronado Drive from subject property FRONTIER ENGINEERING INC. OFFICE LOCATION CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS P.O. Box 89683 Tampa, FL 33689 Ph: (813) 628-8878 Fax: (813) 628-8878 Mr. Kevin Nurnberger, Planner II Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 St. Petersburg, FI 33756 RE: Coronado Parking Lot Application #:FLD2011-02005 2nd submittal Dear Mr. Nurnberger: March 11, 2011 Enclosed please find the site plan submittal with attachments for the "Coronado Parking Lot" project which is being submitted as a Flexible Development Application. Attached are the following documents for your review: 1) Reponse Comments from DRC (2-28-11) 2) Fifteen (15) Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) (1 original / 14 copies). 3) Fifteen (15) sets of site plans w/topo-boundary-tree surveys and a landscape plan. (1 original / 14 copies) 4) Fifteen (3) sets of drainage reports. 5) One (1) sets of 8.5" x 11" colored landscape plan. 6) Fifteen (15) copies of the Warranty Deed for the property. If you have any questions, please call me at (813) 251-0169 or cell (813) 220-4675. Sincerely, FRONTIER ENGI ING, INC. Timothy J Healey Project Engineer FRONTIER ENGINEERING INC. OFFICE LOCATION CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS P.O. Box 4750 Tampa, FL 33677 Ph: (813) 251-0169 Fax: (813) 251-0179 Mr. Kevin Nurnberger, Planner II Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 St. Petersburg, F133756 RE: Coronado Parking Lot Application #:FLD2011-02005 2° submittal Dear Mr. Nurnberger: March 11, 2011 Please find enclosed three (3) sets of revised plans. Below are the comments received by the City of Clearwater on February 28, 2011 and the associative responses. Land Resource Review 1. Place a note on the demolition plans to "Hand remove the concrete sidewalk under the canopies of the palm trees along 5th Street". • The note stating "Hand remove the concrete sidewalk under the canopies of the palm trees along 5th Street has been placed on the demolition plans. See sheet#3. 2. Show to remove the 6" and I I" palm trees as they are declining. • The 6" and 11 "palm trees will be removed as they are declining. See sheets 1,2, & 3. Planning Review 1. On Sheet 1, change the zip code under property owner from 33712 to 33172. • The zip code has been changed from 33712 to 33172. See sheet#]. 2. On the property show the sight triangle at the corner of Coronado Drive and Fifth Street. • The sight triangle has been shown at the corner of Coronado Drive and Fifth Street. See sheet#]. 3. On Sheet 1, provide the dimensional width of the entrance to the parking lot from Fifth Street. Needs to be a minimum of 24 feet. • The dimensional width of the entrance to the parking lot from Fifth Street now is shown on the plan and is 24 feet wide. See sheet#l. 4. The Site Data Table on Sheet I shows that there is a total of 12,023 square feet of impervious area. Does this number include the "existing pavement to remain" that is a part of the property? If not, then the interior green space calculation of 10,975 square feet is not correct and additional interior landscaping may be required. If 12,023 square feet is the V.U.A. then also revise the interior green space calculation on Sheet L- 1 to 10% of 12,023 square feet. Coronado Parking Lot Page 2 • Per our DRC meeting discussion, the 1,048-SF of paving located along the perimeter of the property is existing to remain; however, has not been considered as vehicular use area inside the site and has been left out of the interior green space calculations. A Comprehensive Landscape application has been submitted to give an overview of our design objectives for the landscape plan. 5. On Sheet L-1 under perimeter requirements, the calculations are incorrect. The north perimeter is 220 feet not 150 feet; the east perimeter is 120 feet not 88 feet; the south perimeter is 220 feet not 150 feet; and the west perimeter is 120 feet not 112 as shown. Correct the calculations and revise the number of trees required which should be 5 trees for the north perimeter, 2 trees for the east perimeter, 6 trees for the south perimeter, and 3 trees for the west perimeter for a total of 16 trees required for the perimeter of the property. • We have submitted a Comprehensive Landscape application to provide details of our design objectives to the City of Clearwater. See landscape plan and application. 6. On Sheet 1, provide wheel stops for all parking spaces. • Wheel stops have been provided for all parking spaces. 7. In the Site Data Table, under Setback Requirements Proposed, provide two additional side setbacks. One for a side (south) setback of 5 .5 feet and another for a side (west) setback of 4 feet. • The site data table has been revised to provide two additional setbacks. One for a side (south) setback of 5.5 feet and another for a side (west) setback of 4 feet. See sheet#1. DRC_Comments 8. On page 3 of the Flexible Development Application, provide a complete response to question #6 that demonstrates compliance with all the design objectives listed for consideration as a Comprehensive Infill Development. Discuss how the proposed landscaping will result in a visually attractive property buffering the street view from the parking lot. • Page 3 of 8, Question#6 answer has been revised to demonstrate compliance with the City 's design objectives Stormwater Review 1. When calculating the C value, the existing impervious area shall be given 1/2 credit, not full credit. • On item #l, I actually had calculated the correct "C" value of 0.53 using the 50% of the impervious areas; however, I failed to change the text field inputs within in the Excel spreadsheet to reflect the proper 50% inputs on the text equation cell. I verified this with manual calculations. Those text inputs have been revised on the attached spreadsheet. (See attached revised drainage report, "C"spreadsheet, page 16) 2. The allowable discharge rate shall be based on the pre-conditions with accounting for 1/2 credit and rainfall intensity of 3.7 inch/hour. • I was using the peak rainfall intensity (8.8 in/hr) instead of the average rainfall intensity of (3.6 in/hr). I have revised the spreadsheet to reflect an allowable discharge rate of 0.86 which is (0.53) x (3.6 in/hr) x (0.45 ac) = 0.86 See attached revised drainage report, Rational method spreadsheet, page 18. 3. Please submit a copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP permit. • The SWFWMD ERP Permit will be forwarded upon receipt. Traffic Eng Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 0 Comment Noted. Coronado Parking Lot Page 3 If you have any questions or require any further information, please call me at (813) 251-0169. Sincerely, FRONTIER ENGINEERING, INC. Timothy J. Healey Project Engineer Clearwater Planning & Development Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 11/29/2010) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Mainstream Partners_ViII, Ltd. 10165 N. W. 19th St., Miami, FI 33172 mainstreampartnersviii ar7,gmail.com 898-0015 CELL 461-7695 Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. Frontier Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 4750, Tampa, FI 33677 (813_) _251-0169 FAX NUMBER: (813) 251-0179 (813) 220-4675 E-MAIL ADDRESS: frontierengineerinq(C7yahO .-com The landscaping requirements of Article 3, Division 12, may be modified or waived as part of a Level One (Flexible Standard) or Level Two (Flexible Development) application, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans, sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary to supplement the information provided on this worksheet. Landscaping associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The proposed landscape design for theprope_y incorporates the "Beach by Design" features such as an attractive 36 height landscape buffer between the parking area and the public right of wJhis vegetative buffer will consist of a continuous row of oleander shrubs that flower at least nine months of the year. This plant material is hardy, drought tolerant and salt tolerant. In addition to the vegetative buffer, existing palms have been preserved and shade trees (live oaks) have been specified at the corner of 5th Street and Hamden Drive. The palms and oaks will provide shade for the parking and screen the views into the Page 1 of 2 site from the roadway. The proposed design will create a tropical landscape that provides human scale, is compatible with and the existing environment will improve the beach community. 2. LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. There is no lighting proposed for this parking lot. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The proposed landscape design for the property incorporates the "Beach by Design" suggested plant materials such as flowering shrubs and shade trees that are adapted to the beach environment, are in harmony with the existing plant palette of the beach and will enhance the esthetics of the site. 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The landscape treatment proposed will have a beneficial impact on the values of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development by eliminating a vacant property with no landscaping and adding attractive "Beach b Design" plantings that can be enjoyed by residents and will be esthetically pleasing to visitors in the area . 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposed landscape design for the property incorporates the "Beach by Design" guidelines by doing the following: including tropical plant materials, using plant materials that have already been utilized in the beach area and by providing a vegetative screen between the public roadway and the project parking. The use of tall flowering shrubs. existing palms an sae trees incorporates all of the suggested landscape items listed in the guidelines. the completed landscape will enhance the esthetics of the area and will be a community asset. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in tf}is,application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ? U 4", day of A.D. 20 \ 1 to me and/or by rtii cis VX(d':XVkIZ-2 who is personally known has produced as identification.--- !Notary Public Stal em Flofft Lisa C Ratdiffe l Signature of property owner of representative vauLdl y puona, - --- .,..,.,,,,.?,,,,.., .. My commission expires: c1 e '';fit L ''?oF t? Expires 09130/201 C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlLoca/ SettingM Temporary Internet FileMContent.Out/ookWPMVX8F11Comprehensive Landscape Program 11 2010.docx Page 2 of 2 I ti Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets I? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1,205.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- , PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER CELL NUMBER: Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. 10165 N. W. 19th St., Miami, FI 33172 727Z 461-7695 FAX NUMBER: 727 4 - ------- - 42-9983 ----- -------? N/A EMAIL: mainstreampartnersviii@gmail.com Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. Frontier En ineerinq, Inc. P.O. Box 4750, Tampa, Fl 33677 _ J813) 251-0169 _ FAX NUMBER: (813) 251-0179 (813) 220-4675 EMAIL: frontierenaineerinar&vahoo.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Coronado Parking Lot - PROJECT VALUATION: $ 50,000 STREET ADDRESS 401 Coronado Dr. & 406 Hamden Dr., Clearwater F 33756 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 08-29-15-1.7.62_2-000-0010 & 08-29-15-17622_-0000-0110 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.45 PARCEL SIZE (square feet) 19,800 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1, 11 and 12, Columbia Subdivision No. 4, as recorded in plat book 27 page 50, Pinellas County, Florida. PROPOSED USE(S): Pay_parki g lot DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Construction of a 28-space pay parking _lot on a 0.45-acre site. Specifically identify the request - (include number of units or square - - ------ -- ------ - -- --- - ---- footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UN DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _1L (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) W( SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) iq Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed project will be a benefit to the area by offering offstreet parking to the surrounding hotels and tourist use commercial developments within the area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will encourage new development and use of adjacent lands/buildings by providing additional offsite parking for their patrons. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed project will be a benefit to the area and will have no adverse impacts on the community or the health and safety of persons working or residing in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed project will help eliminate traffic congestion by providing 28 new offstreet parking spaces for the area. _- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed project provides 28 new offstreet parking' spaces for the hotels/shops within the immediate vicinity and is consistent with the character of community that is often deficient on parking during tourist season_ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. There are no structures proposed the scope of this project or uses that will have adverse _ impacts on the community regarding visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation on adjacent properties_- - -- ---- -. - ------ C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The "T" zoning 20,000SF minimum lot area can not be met without deviation. The property is 19,800-SF. ------ - ------------ The "T" zoning minimum lot width of 100' can not be met without deviation. The property is 60' wide. TheS" zon* 15 ff11Q.frcntside/reaps-etback wouldiminate-2--w-ay drlYe--aLs-le on the west lot. -__ 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The proposed project will be a benefit to the area and will have no adverse impacts on the community. As such the redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan__ and the basic planning objectives of the code and intent of the zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. With recent new developments in the area the proposed rroject will be a benefit by providing 28 new parking spaces for the adjacent Tourist uses and will have no adverse impacts on the community. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. There are no structures proposed the scope of this project will have any negative impacts on adjoining properties. The project will also be landscaped to provide green space aesthetics to the vicinity as well as providing 28 new parking spaces to be used by the adjoining properties. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed landscape design for the property incorporates the "Beach by Design" requirements such as buffering parking areas from public right of ways and providing shade for surface parking areas. Additionally, the specified plants types will provide an attractive buffer that will thrive in the beach enviroment. -This en ance an scape esign wt a visua y in ere-s ing.wl -its va Irlr e y o color an texture. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) qf' A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; W Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. Y COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable V ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN,SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) W SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; V LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; l( GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 A G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) Fq( SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ? Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; N/A Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; N/A Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; V All required setbacks; ? All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including ? description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; ? Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ? Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; ? All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ? Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); v Location of all landscape material; ? Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; N/A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and N/A Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. W SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; 19,800-SF(0.45-AC.) _ 19,800-SF(0.45-AC.) Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 16 _ N/A 0 Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; N/A _N/A 0 Gross floor area devoted to each use; X1$6-GFA(NON-RES) N/A-_ 0 Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; 34 N/A 28 Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; 10,884-SF(55%) N/A 12,023-SF(61 %) Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; PB.27,PG.50 N/A N/A Building and structure heights; N/A _ N/A N/A Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 17,526-SF(88%) N/A 12,023-SF(61 %) Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 6,642-SF(0.33) N/A 0 H REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'% X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contour pot elevatio=n site; t Offsite elevations re All open space a Location of all ea r w Lot lines and buil lines Streets and drive imen: to evate the walls M ei Building and strudWI setbacks Structural overhangs; for the parcel; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all v existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _ percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. Q( REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of Materials REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to ition: on '/= X 1 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. N/A. There are no existing or free standing signs. All signs have been demolished. V All PROPOSED freestanding an attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors,. materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) N/A. A sign permit application will be submitted after comprehensive infill site plan approval. ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/1 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) N/A. Project will generate < 100 trips per hour & < 1000 trips per day. See attached calculations. ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ? Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. i Signatur of property owner r representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLQS Sig to and subscribed before me this ? LL'9 day of r3i t ( V A.D. 201_ to me and/or by a ot? i e? who is personally known has produced as i entification. t'wVAr Nota ic, My commission expires: o00 oo? Notary Public State of Florida a I&A - Lisa C Ratcliffe ?o'r,,dF Expires 09/3012011 C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive InfilfT r et Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: -Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 401 Coronado Dr_& 406 Hamden Dr., Clearwater, Fl 33756 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Construction of a 28-space pay parking lot on a 0.45-acre site. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Frontier Engineering, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner _ Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Nuc te of Florida Lisa C Ratcliffe 21 Commission DD720548 E 4 5 Aires 08/30/2011 1 Notary Pu1blSigne re " x Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: (-l I ; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FI-D) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 $52.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $63525.00 COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC8 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS RETURN TO: First American Title Ins. Co. 25400 US 19 N, Suite 135 Clearwater, FL 33763 P,95(0-6 This instrument prepared by, and return to: Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Attn: Michael T. Lynott , > Tax Identification Parcel No. 08129/15/176221000/0010; 08/29/15/17622/00010020; 08/29/15/176221000/0030; 08/29/15/17622/000/0050; 08/29/15/176221000/0110; 07/29/15/52380/000/0630; 07/29/15/52380/000/1110;08/29/15/17586/001/0120; 08/29/15/17586/001/0130; 08/29/15/17586/001/0140; 08/29/15/17604/000/0080; 08/29/15/17604/000/0100 - _ - ?, (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDING DATA) ` SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED`. -> STATE OF FLORIDA § - - - • ` § RN6WAU 1Vi$A18'Y THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF PINELLAS 325 SOUTH GULFVIEW.IOE,VARLU- CLEARWATER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Grantor"),,fqr ansl in bQmideration of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the,.rdc6ipY- afid sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, has GRANTED, BARGAI TD, SOI:D;,ALIENATED, REMISED, RELEASED, CONVEYED and CONFIRMED and byJhl se,freselikk, does GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL, ALIEN, REMISE, RELEASE, CONVEY airct NFIRM unto MAINSTREAM PARTNERS VIII, LTD., a Florida limited partners hiB?(s`G(aok?") the tract or parcel of land in Pinellas County, Florida, described in Exhibit A. TOGZITWJZ- widtall the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereto belonging or in an)cwLse?pp@rtaining, including without limitation, Grantor's interest, if any, in any and all ad?iaqceht-s?teets,:4ll,ys, rights of way and any adjacent strips and gores (such land and interests are'her@i>iaNr collectively referred to as the "Property"). ` This Special Warranty Deed and the conveyance hereinabove set forth is executed by ` 6ragt jr ,dnd accepted by Grantee subject to all easements, restrictions, reservations and covbnafits now of record and further subject to all matters that a current, accurate survey of the Property would show, together with the matters described in Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to the extent the same are validly existing and applicable to the Property (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Permitted Exceptions"). Grantee acknowledges that Grantee has independently and personally inspected the Property. The Property is hereby conveyed to and accepted by Grantee in its present condition, "AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, AND WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, (,p hing EXPRESS OR IMPLIED." Notwithstanding anyt contained herein to the contrary, it is understood and agreed that Grantor and Grantor's agents or employees have never made and are -irf- = not now making, and they specifically disclaim, any warranties, representations or guaranties any kind or character, express or implied, oral or written, with respect to the Property, inc? but not limited to, warranties, representations or guaranties as to (a) matters of title (attar than' Grantor's warranty of title set forth herein), (b) environmental matters relating to the Proj?eYt3!ddr any portion thereof, including, without limitation, the presence of hazardous ma6)iQs.id,. bn, under or in the vicinity of the Property, (c) geological conditions, including, wit0out liirlit,4tidA; subsidence, subsurface conditions, water table, underground water reservpirs, limitations regarding the withdrawal of water, and geologic faults and the resulting ifiruAge%Q'f pasr,and/or future faulting, (d) whether, and to the extent to which the Property o?'any portion fhereof is affected by any stream (surface or underground), body of water, weal nds, floj ? prone area, flood plain, floodway or special flood hazard, (e) drainage, (f) soil cotihtinnsf'including the existence of instability, past soil repairs, soil additions or conditions of soil fill; or susceptibility to landslides, or the sufficiency of any undershoring, (g) th6,presence of endangered species or any environmentally sensitive or protected areas, (h) zoning or'l !Iding-&ititlements to which the Property or any portion thereof may be subject, (i) the ivailabilit? p'f, ?ny utilities to the Property or any portion thereof including, without limitation; waten?spWage?,,gas and electric, 0) usages of adjoining property, (k) access to the Property or` gay, poi i4kn thereof, (1) the value, compliance with the plans and specifications, size, locationme,' §ea A??ign, quality, description, suitability, structural integrity, operation, title to, or physical of,tradpcial condition of the Property or any portion thereof, or any income, expenses, oharges, liens, encumbrances, rights or claims on or affecting or pertaining to the Property` ?' ?l?y _gatsAhereof, (m) the condition or use of the Property or compliance of the Pr?dpertyv(%ith any o"r all federal, state or local ordinances, rules, regulations or laws, building,,fire ors'zonini ordinances, codes or other similar laws, (n) the existence or non-existence gf`uridergrbund storage tanks, surface impoundments, or landfills, (o) any other matter affectinjg;ihstability, and integrity of the Property, (p) the potential for further development of the Props-Ay,.('g) the iherchantability of the Property or fitness of the Property for any particular purpose, {t) the,truth, accuracy or completeness of the Property Documents, (s) tax consequences, o ? I) any Viher, matter or thing with respect to the Property. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH I&REIN OR IN THE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE BY,?.ND,'RETW9?,VN GRANTOR AND GRANTEE (AS ASSIGNEE PURSUANT TO THAT X` StGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE ANDOALE DATED MARCH 10, 2009), GRANTOR MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS O1<1,W4R,RA_ T`ItS OF ANY KIND TO GRANTEE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMI?ATI,ON, THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY, OR ITS <'§UITAVIJ..I'FV FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR OF MERCHANTABILITY. GRtANTtF, IS RELYING ON ITS INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PROPERTY IN Dht'EI MINING WHETHER TO ACQUIRE IT. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH ARE A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR GRANTOR EXECUTING THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, AND SHALL SURVIVE CLOSING. 2 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property in fee simple, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereunto in anywise belonging, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, and Grantor does hereby bind itself, its successors and assigns, to WARRAI= . _ _ AND FOREVER DEFEND all and singular the title to the Property unto the said Grantee,Its ? > successors and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to clairrt,tf a same or any part thereof by, through, or under Grantor, but not otherwise, subject to the Poj!n ?d Exceptions. Grantee's address is: Mainstream Partners VIII, Ltd. 10165 N.W. 19' Street ' Miami, FL 33172 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank, signature pages, follows) ? r ? ? 1 3 DATED as of March 13 , 2009. WITNESSED: Sign: Print: Sign: Print: STATE OF -Tk& S COUNTY OF -DLL1a-5- The foregoing instrument was ?, YYYt ne r? ------------- Boulevard - Clearwater LLC, a Deli 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 325 SOUTH GUL" EW BOULEVARD - CLEARWATFR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability,, company - N IN `, `. , I' I 1 1 1 1 1 By: Name: ' W kleft Title: 11 3 ,1` 2009, by acknowledgpdbefo 4111 this. 4 of South March, of 325 Gulfview as- Iwam litpiied liability, `Fompany, on behalf of the company. HeIShe is personally known to me or has prccTuced as identification. NO?'AR PUBLIC: KIMBERLY LYNN J/C?KBON,? Notery Publk, Starie etTexps,. •.-? ?? + MY NCO'99, 201T. M!arcp' 1t, Print State of? at Large (Seal) ' ," , M Co scion Expires: March q , ao I I IN I I - - 1. EXHIBIT A Description of the Property .> ` Parcel 1: Lots 8, 9 and 9-A, Columbia Subdivision No. 3, according to the map or plat thereof 4s,' recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 46, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 2: Lot 12, Block A, Columbia Sub. No. 2, according to the map or plat thereof as feaor&%(s in Plat Book 21, Page(s) 79, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 3: Lot 10 and 10-A, Columbia Subdivision No. 3, according to t?91map or play tliereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 46, Public Records of Pinellas County„ Florida. Parcel 4: Lots 13 and 14, Block A, Columbia Sub. No. 2, according to theiii p-oi plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page(s) 79, Public Records of Pinellps County, Florida. Parcel 5: Lot 1, Columbia Subdivision No. 4, according-to the map ot?lat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 50, Public Records of Pinellas Cg1tlopda;?? Parcel 6: Lots 11 and 12, Columbia Subdivision No:,4, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page(s) 50, Ptibll R'eFords tof Pinellas County, Florida; also, beginning at the intersection of the high water mark of tl?)Gulf of Mexico and the East and West center line of Section 8, Township 29,SoiAh, Range I1? East; and run thence East along the East and West center line of said Secticari'8;,j64,35-feet, thence South 1573.94 feet; thence South 77°25'30" East, 280 feet for a Pant'of Begipriing; thence South 77°25'30" East, 10 feet; thence South 12°34'30" West, 50.87 feefi thaftee N6Ah 77°25'30" West, 10 feet; thence North 12°34'30" East, 50.87 feet to a Por' t o'f,'Beginning, otherwise described as Lot 1-A of Columbia Subdivision No. 5, accofding to the ?ap or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 16, Public Records of Pinellas'Cojunty, Fldfida. Parcel 7: Lot 2,,?olu_ bNi `Sui vision No. 4, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pee(s) 50,'Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 8: Lols,5 81x1=6,-Columbia Subdivision No. 4, according to the map or plat thereof as recoreWc[DrPId4bok 27, Page(s) 50, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Pardef-9:?Lots 3 and 4, Columbia Subdivision No. 4, according to the map or plat thereof as ,'I,recordel 'ip Plat Book 27, Page(s) 50, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ` Parcel ,10: Lot 111 and the Northerly 1/2 of Lot 112, Lloyd-White-Skinner Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page(s) 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 11: The Southerly 1/2 of Lot 112 and all of Lots 113, 114, 115, 116 and 117, Lloyd- White-Skinner Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page(s) 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Lots 63 through 66, inclusive, Lloyd-White-Skinner Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page(s) 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. A-1 EXHIBIT B Permitted Exceptions _ ' - - - 1. The lien of the taxes for the year 2009 and all subsequent years, which are not j et We,' and payable. 2. Dedications of the Plat of The Lloyd-White-Skinner Subdivision, recorded in Plgt `136 lk 13, Page 12 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Dedications of the Plat of Columbia Sub. No. 2, recorded in Plax'Hook 21,, N -70 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 4. Dedications of the Plat of Columbia Subdivision No. 3, recorded in -1?lat Book 27, Page 46 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.; `, 5. Dedications, easements and restrictions of the- Pjat of% CphfWbia Subdivision No. 4, recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 50 of the Public'I??eco&S-of pkle7las County, Florida. 6. Dedications of the Plat of Columbia Subcfix ion??To. 5, recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 16 of the Public Records of Pinellas60u4y, kkidk,, > 7. Easement granted to Florida Epwer,Corpor*t)on by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 2610, Page 713. Affects Parael'9',, 8. Rights of apartment teiq rlts iyr, , scion, as tenants only, pursuant to unrecorded rental or lease agreements,,^Jvithq?lt,rights or options to purchase. A-2 \ ° Clearwater FEE SCHEDULE Community Development Code (Appendix A) Effective Date: January 18, 2008 1. Applications for Level One Development Approval (a) Minimum standard development_____________________-_-_____-__ No fee -------------------------------------- -------------------------------- (b) Flexible standard development - Detached dwellings and two attached dwellings - accessory uses/structures------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ 100.00 (c) Flexible standard development - Detached dwellings and two attached dwellings,-__________200.00 (d) Flexible standard development - Attached dwellings, mixed uses and nonresidential uses-475.00 (e) Continuances requested by applicant of a development review committee meeting ------------ 75.00 (f) Sidewalk cafe application (if proposed as accessory to an existing use)__________________________ 50.00 (g) Sidewalk cafe application (if part of a flexible standard application) ----------------------------- No fee (h) Sidewalk caf6 permit ------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------•------120.00 Due. on or before October 1 of each year and shall cover the time period of October 1 through September 30 of the following calendar year. For a permit issued after October 1 and before September 30, the permit fee shall be prorated on a monthly basis. Any portion of the month shall be considered a full month for the purposes of calculating the prorated permit fee. II. Applications for Level Two Development Approval (a) Flexible development - Detached dwellings, two attached dwellings and accessory uses/structures 300.00 (b) Flexible development - Attached dwellings, mixed uses and nonresidential uses ---------- - 1,205.00 (c) Appeals to the community development board (CDB) - Residential and nonresidential - --- 250.00 (d) Appeals to a hearing officer -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 500.00 (e) Continuances requested by applicant of a CDB meeting/public hearing ---------------------- ----- 75.00 (f) Transfer of development rights (no additional charge if submitted with flexible development application) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 1,205.00 (g) Preliminary plat----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 600.00 (h) Minor revisions. 400.00 (i) Sidewalk cafe application (if part of a flexible development application) -------------------- --- No fee III. Applications for Level Three Development Approval (a) Annexations (including land use map amendment and rezoning to categories compatible with the county designations) ----------- -------------------------------------------- --------- No fee (b) Land use map amendment ___________________-_ - --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - 885.00 - ------- (c) Rezoning only______________ 775.00 (d) Continuances requested by applicant of a city council meeting/public hearing_______ ___________ 75.00 (e) Development agreement------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - -----1,500.00 (f) Final plat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- 300.00 (g) Vested rights --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- 500.00 IV. Other (a) Minor lot adjustment and division of a previously platted lot_________________________ ______________ 150.00 (b) Zoning verification letter ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- 50.00 (c) Zoning interpretation letter and release of unity of title letter ------------------------- -------------- 150.00 (d) Comprehensive sign program ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- 400.00 (e) Minor amendment to a comprehensive sign program, per application -------------- -------------- 150.00 (f) Temporary use permits for seasonal sales --------------------------------------------------- -------------- 250.00 (g) Fire preliminary site plan------------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ------ --- ----------200.00 C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN--I.BRE\LOCALS- I\Temp\Community Development Code Fee Schedule 01.18.2008.doc