01/18/2011
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
January 18, 2011
Present: Nicholas C. Fritsch Chair
Thomas Coates Vice-Chair
Frank L. Dame Board Member
Doreen DiPolito Board Member
Kurt B. Hinrichs Board Member
Norma R. Carlough Acting Board Member
Absent: Richard Adelson Board Member
Brian A. Barker Board Member
Also Present: Gina Grimes Attorney for the Board
Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney
Michael L. Delk Planning & Development Director
Robert Tefft Development Review Manager
Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation
and Pledge of Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: December 21, 2010
Member Dame moved to approve the minutes of the regular Community Development
Board meeting of December 21, 2010, as recorded and submitted in written summation to each
board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
C. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE: (Item 1) (Continue to February 15, 2011)
1. Case: FLD2010-09027 – 1315 Cleveland Street Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Nemishawn, Inc.
Agent: Kevin Bessolo, Bessolo Design Group, Inc. (556 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg,
FL 33701; phone: 727-894-4453; fax: 727-896-8662; email: kbessolo@bessolo.com).
Location: 2.09 acres located on the south side of Cleveland Street between Fredrica
Drive and Lady Mary Drive.
Atlas Page: 287B.
Existing Zoning: Commercial (C) District.
Request: Flexible Development application to permit a Governmental use (WorkNet Pinellas) and
Social/Public Service Agency use (Coordinated Child Care), in the Commercial (C) District within
the East Gateway Character District with a lot area of 91,093 square-feet, a lot width of 250 feet
(along Cleveland Street), 364 feet (along Lady Mary Drive), 363 feet (along Fredrica Drive), a front
(north) setback of 17.5 feet (to existing building), a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to existing
pavement) and 83.5 feet (to existing building), a front (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing
pavement) and 85.2 feet (to existing building), a side (south) setback of 15 feet (to existing
Community Development 2011-01-18 1
pavement) and 155.4 feet (to existing building), a building height of 23 feet (to midpoint of roof)
and 111 parking spaces as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-704.C.
Proposed Use: Governmental and Social/Public Service Agency.
Neighborhood Associations: East Gateway and Neighbors Association and Clearwater
Neighborhood Coalition.
Presenter: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III.
See Exhibit: Memorandum FLD2010-09027 2011-01-18
In response to a question, Planning Director Michael Delk said staff cannot predict the
outcome of discussions the applicant plans to have with the neighborhood. It was
recommended that the applicant consider the East Gateway five-year Action Plan.
Member Coates moved to continue case FLD2010-09027 to February 15, 2011. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
D. CONSENT AGENDA: The following case is not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring
property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting:
(Item 1)
1. Case: FLD2010-11031– 934 Eldorado Avenue Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Henry Bohinick
Agent: David F Ramsey, Professional Engineer. (434 Skinner Boulevard, Suite 105,
Dunedin, FL 34698; phone: 727-409-4639; email: davidf.ramsey@verizon.net)
Location: 0.15 acre property on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 120 feet
south of Laurel Street
Atlas Page: 238A
Existing Zoning: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
Request: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a new single-family detached
dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600
square-feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet
(to building) and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Coastal
Construction Control Line) for an in-ground swimming pool and deck and a reduction to the rear
(west) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to Coastal Construction Control Line) for the principal
structure as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 2-204.E.
Proposed Use: Detached dwelling
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition and Clearwater Beach
Association
Presenter: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
See Exhibit: Staff Report FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
Member Coates moved to approve Case FLD2010-11031 on today’s Consent Agenda
based on evidence in the record, including the application(s) and the Staff Report(s), and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report(s), with
conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Community Development 2011-01-18 2
E. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 1:11 p.m
Community Development 2011-01-18
Vto- Chair -TW w• es
Community Devopm?oeAnt'I'ES
Board
EXHIBIT: STAFF MEMORANDUM FLD2010-09027 2011-01-18
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Community Development Board
FROM:
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
RE:
Request for Continuance to February 15, 2011
DATE:
January 12, 2011
The applicant requests a continuance of case FLD2010-09027 to February 15, 2011.
EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
CDB Meeting Date: January 18, 2011
Case Number: FLD2010-11031
Agenda Item: C.2.
Owner/Applicant: Henry Bohinick
Agent: David F Ramsey, Professional Engineer
Address: 934 Eldorado Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a new
single-family detached dwelling within the Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600
square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (East)
setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building) and a reduction to
the rear (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Coastal
Construction Control Line) for an in-ground swimming pool and
deck and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to
10.7 feet (to Coastal Construction Control Line) for the principal
structure as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 2-204.E.
CURRENT ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
CURRENT FUTURE
LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU)
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant lot
Proposed Use: Single-Family Detached Dwelling
EXISTING North:Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
SURROUNDING Detached Dwellings
ZONING AND USES:
South:Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
East: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District
Water
Community Development Board – January 18, 2011
FLD2010-11031 – Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.15 acre subject property is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 120
feet south of Laurel Street. The property is presently a vacant lot. The properties to the north,
south and east are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed
with detached dwellings. Land to the west is zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District and
is the Gulf of Mexico.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to develop the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling. The
request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the requested rear (west) setback
reduction to the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) for pool, decking and the main
structure. The main structure will have a 10.7 foot setback from the CCCL which is consistent
with houses immediately adjacent and south (930, 920 Eldorado) of the subject property, while
the pool and decking will have a zero foot setback from the CCCL which is also consistent with
the houses to the south of the subject property. Pursuant to Section 3-905.C.2 of the Community
Development Code (CDC), any requests to modify setback requirements from the CCCL shall be
considered through a Level Two development process.
The development proposal’s compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is
discussed below.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban
(RU) land use category, the allowable ISR is 0.65. The site is in compliance as an ISR of 0.648
is proposed.
Density: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category,
the allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot area is 6,600 square feet (0.15 acres), one
dwelling unit is allowed and therefore, the proposed density is in compliance.
Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is
no minimum lot area. The lot area of the subject property is 6,600 square feet which exceeds the
detached dwelling minimum standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is
no minimum lot width. The subject property lot width is 60 feet which exceeds the detached
dwelling minimum standard of 50 feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, within the LMDR District, Residential
Infill Projects shall have a front setback between 10 – 25 feet, a side setback between zero to five
feet, and a rear setback between zero to 15 feet. The proposal includes a front (east) setback of
15 feet and a rear (west) setback of zero feet with no reductions to side setbacks and is therefore
compliant with the above referenced requirements.
The reduction in front and rear setbacks allows for a development consistent with the
surrounding and emerging development pattern. The existing detached dwelling immediately
adjacent and to the north of the subject property (936 Eldorado) is setback 3.3 feet from the east
Community Development Board – January 18, 2011
FLD2010-11031 – Page 2 of 5
EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
property line. The existing detached dwelling (920 Eldorado) to the south of the subject property
is setback 5 feet or less from the east property line. Therefore the front setback of 15 feet is
justified and consistent with the emerging development pattern while still providing the
necessary off-street parking. With regard to the rear setback, the development pattern along
Eldorado is moving from typical ranch style Florida homes toward larger homes occupying a
greater portion of lot area than the existing homes. In addition, a site visit, review of aerial
photographs, and provided surveys show that several existing waterfront detached dwellings in
the vicinity of the subject property appear to have up to zero foot structural setbacks to the
CCCL. The existing detached dwellings immediately to the south of the subject property are set
back zero feet from the CCCL for pool and decks (926 and 920 Eldorado). The existing detached
dwellings immediately to the south of the subject property are set back 10 feet or less from the
CCCL for the main structure (930 and 920 Eldorado). Therefore, the rear setback reduction to
provide a typical amenity of a pool and decking for a beachfront detached dwelling is justified
and consistent with the emerging development pattern. The rear setback reduction to provide
adequate views from the main structure is justified and consistent with the emerging
development pattern.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects,
the maximum building height in the LMDR District is 30 feet. The building height of the
detached dwelling will maintain a maximum building height of 30 feet as measured to the
midpoint of a sloped roof, which is consistent with the above, as well as with the definition of
“height, building or structure” as set forth in Article 8 of the CDC.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill
projects, two parking spaces are required. The proposal is to provide four off-street parking
spaces as through two driveways and two single-car-garages for the dwelling, which is consistent
with the above.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar
mechanical equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such
equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing
units for air conditioners as well as pool equipment will be placed adjacent to the side of the
dwelling. Compliance with screening requirements will be reviewed at time of building permit
submittal.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912. all utilities including individual distribution lines shall
be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. This proposal will
comply with this requirement.
Solid Waste: The dwelling unit will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal which
will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires these black barrels to be
screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls, fences or other
appropriate screening materials will be reviewed at time of building permit submittal.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subject property.
Community Development Board – January 18, 2011
FLD2010-11031 – Page 3 of 5
EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the
consistency of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables
2-201.1 and 2-204:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 7.5 du/ac 1 du/ac X
ISR 0.65 0.648 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 6,600 square feet X 1
Minimum Lot Width N/A 60 feet X 1
Minimum Setbacks Front: 10 - 25 feet East: 15 feet (to building) X 1
Side: 0 - 5 feet North: 5 feet (to building) X
South: 5 feet (to building) X
Rear: 0 - 10 feet West: Zero feet (to deck) X 1
10.7 feet (to building)
Maximum Height 30 feet 30 feet X
Minimum Off-Street 2 spaces per dwelling unit 4 spaces X
Parking
1
See Analysis in Staff Report
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.E
(Residential Infill Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity
or other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which X
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
Community Development Board – January 18, 2011
FLD2010-11031 – Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of January 6, 2011 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1.That the 0.15 acres is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 120 feet
south of Laurel Street;
2.That the property is currently a vacant lot;
3.That the proposal is to develop the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling;
4.That the proposal includes a reduction of the rear setback from the Coastal Construction
Control Line (CCCL) of 10 feet to zero feet (to deck); and
5.That pursuant to CDC Section 3-905.C.2, any requests to modify setback requirements from
the CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process; and
6.That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1.That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
204 of the Community Development Code;
2.That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
204.E of the Community Development Code; and
3.That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code.
APPROVAL
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends of
the Flexible Development application for the construction of a new single-family detached
dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600
square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet
(to building) and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Coastal
Construction Control Line) for an in-ground swimming pool and deck at existing grade and a
reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to Coastal Construction Control
Line) for the principal structure as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-204.E with the following conditions of approval:
Conditions of Approval:
1.That the final design and colors of the detached dwelling be consistent with the elevations
approved by the CDB;
2.That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a separate right-of-way permit must be
approved for the installation of the brick paver drive apron;
3.That there are no obstructions in the waterfront site visibility triangles;
4.That pool and deck be constructed no higher than existing grade;
5.That vehicles cannot be parked in the driveway blocking the pedestrian access to the concrete
sidewalk;
Community Development Board – January 18, 2011
FLD2010-11031 – Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT: STAFF REPORT FLD2010-11031 2011-01-18
6.That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment
including air conditioning and pool equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets
and properties; and
7.That all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless
such undergrounding is not practicable. This proposal will comply with this requirement. ,
prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Attachments: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board – January 18, 2011
FLD2010-11031 – Page 6 of 5
Clearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist;
Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for January 18, 2011
DATE: January 13, 2011
CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items:
Agenda
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting
Level Two Applications (Item 1-2)
1. Case: FLD2010-09027 -1315 Cleveland Street
Yes No
Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III.
2. Case: FLD2010-11031- 934 Eldorado Avenue Planner: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
5
Yes No
PRINT NAME
S. (Planning DepartmentlC D BW gendas DRC & CDRCDk201 h01 January 201111 Cover MEMO 2011.doc
Lj-
Clearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist;
Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for January 18, 2011
DATE: January 13, 2011
CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items:
Agenda
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting
Level Two Applications (Item 1-2)
1. Case: FLD2010-09027 -1315 Cleveland Street Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III.
Yes V No
2. Case: FV2110-11031- 934 Eldorado Avenue Planner: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Yes No
Signature: Date: 2011 61 16
C o -?
PRIN
S. IPlanntng DepartmentlC D BWgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011I01 January 201111 Cover MEMO 2011.doc
"Clearwater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist;
Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for January 18, 2011
DATE: January 13, 2011
CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items:
Agenda
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting
Level Two Applications (Item 1-2)
Case: FLD2010-09027 - 13 15 Cleveland Street Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III.
Yes
No b\
2. Case: FLD2010-1 103 1- 934 Eldorado Avenue Planner: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Yes x No
Signature:
,? Date: / / uIll
I" i?-, , D
PRINT NAME
S. (Planning DepartmentlC D BWgendas DRC & CDBICDB12011101 January 201111 Cover MEMO 2011.doc
Clearwater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist;
Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for January 18, 2011
DATE: January 13, 2011
CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items:
Agenda
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting
Level Two Applications (Item 1-2)
1. Case: FLD2010-09027 -1315 Cleveland Street Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner 111.
Yes
No
2. Case: FLD2010-1 103 1- 934 Eldorado Avenue Planner: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Yes No
have
Signature:
PRINT
Date: ?\
S: )Planning Department)C D BUgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2011101 January 201111 Cover MEMO 2011.doc
Clearwater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist;
Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for January 18, 2011
DATE: January 13, 2011
CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items:
Agenda
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting
Level Two Applications (Item 1-2)
1. Case: FLD2010-09027 -13 15 Cleveland Street Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III.
Yes No
S
2. Case: FLD2010-1 103 1- 934 Eldorado Avenue Planner: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Yes Lf No
S.-Tlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDMDB12011101 January 201111 Cover MEMO 2011.doc
Clearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Robert Tef t, Development Review Manager
COPIES: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, City Clerk Specialist;
Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk; /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for January 18, 2011
DATE: January 13, 2011
CDB packets being distributed on contain the following items:
Agenda
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting
Level Two Applications (Item 1-2)
1. Case: FLD2010-09027 - 1315 Cleveland Street Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III.
Yes 7 No
2. Case: FLD2010-1 103 1- 934 Eldorado Avenue Planner: Ellen Crandall, Planner II
Yes No
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D Bl4gendas DRC & CDBICDM2011101 January 2011U Cover MEMO 2011.doc
PRINT NAME