The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2010-12033; 311 GULFVIEW BLVD S; SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGEFLD2010m12033 311 S Gulfview BLVD Date Received: 12/1/2010 11:44:59 AM Surf Style Parking Garage ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager CDB Meeting Date: February 15, 2011 Case Number: FLD2010-12033 (Related to DVA2010-12001) Agenda Item: E. 2. Owner/Applicant: L.O.M., Inc. Representative: Andy Goulish PE, Finfrock Construction, Inc. Address: 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of 34,007 square feet of floor area, a Restaurant of 9,018 square feet of floor area and a Parking Garage of 344 parking spaces (including 44 accessory parking spaces for the Retail Sales and Services and Restaurant uses and 300 public parking spaces) with a lot area of 43,543 square feet, a lot width of 180 feet on S. Gulfview Blvd (west) and 174 feet on Coronado Drive (east), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 1.4 feet (to building), a side (north) setback of 0.2 feet (to building) and 0.9 feet (to sidewalk), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building), a building height of 59.5 feet (to highest parking deck) and 344 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of the Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Beach Walk PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Under construction, but previously approved for Retail Sales and Services of 34,183 square feet of floor area, a Restaurant of 6,887 square feet of floor area and a Parking Garage of 349 parking spaces (including 49 accessory parking spaces for the Retail Sales and Services and Restaurant uses and 300 public parking spaces) (0.94 Floor Area Ratio) at a height of 59.5 feet (to highest parking deck) Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services (and Beach Walk Thru Area) of 34,007 square feet of floor area, a Restaurant of 9,018 square feet of floor area and a Parking Garage of 344 parking spaces (including 44 accessory parking spaces for the Retail Sales and Services and Restaurant uses and 300 public parking spaces) (0.99 Floor Area Ratio) at a height of 59.5 feet (to highest parking deck) Community Development Board - February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 1 of 8 EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District SURROUNDING Mixed Use (Overnight accommodations and ZONING AND USES: Attached dwellings) and Parking Garage South: Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodations East: Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodations and Retail sales West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District Clearwater Beach ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.99-acre subject property is located between S. Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive approximately 200 feet south of Third Street. At its meeting of December 15, 2009, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application (FLD2009-09032) to permit 34,183 square feet of retail sales and services floor area, 6,887 square feet of restaurant floor area, and a 349 space parking garage (49 parking spaces for the retail sales and services and restaurant uses, and 300 public parking spaces) with a lot area of 43,543 square feet, a lot width of 180 feet on S. Gulfview Blvd. (west) and 174 feet on Coronado Drive (east), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 1.4 feet (to building), a side (north) setback of 0.2 feet (to building) and 0.9 feet (to sidewalk), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building), a building height of 59.5 feet (to highest parking deck) and 349 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2009-00004) was recommended for approval by the CDB at its meeting of January 5, 2010, and approved by the City Council at its meeting of February 18, 2010. Development Proposal: The development proposal is to permit 30,211 square feet of retail sales and services floor area, 9,018 square feet of restaurant floor area and a 344 parking space parking garage (44 parking spaces for the retail sales and services and restaurant uses, and 300 public parking spaces). This application would result in 176 square feet less retail sales and services floor area, 2,131 square feet more restaurant floor area, and 5 fewer parking spaces for the retail/restaurant uses than previously approved. The FAR would be increased by 0.05; however the height (to highest parking deck) would remain the same and no further flexibility with regard to setbacks will be required. It is noted that the advertisement for this application denoted a retail floor area of 34,007 square feet. In addition to the actual "retail sales and services" floor area, this square footage includes the dedicated Beach Walk Thru Area which functions more as a common space that is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week as a publicly accessible corridor between Coronado Drive and the Beachwalk Promenade. The actual, correct square footage for the "retail sales and services" area of the building is 30,211 and all calculations with regard to this application other than Floor Area Ratio have been made based upon this figure. Community Development Board - February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 2 of 8 Also on this CDB agenda is a companion amendment to the previously approved Development Agreement (DVA2010-12001) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for specific parameters of the project. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum FAR for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 1.0. The proposal is for a total of 43,025 square feet of floor area (34,007 square feet of retail (and Beach Walk Thru Area) and 9,018 square feet of restaurant) at a FAR of 0.99, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.94, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum lot area or width requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The subject property has a lot area of 43,543 square feet and lot widths along S. Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive of 180 feet and 174 feet, respectively. These are the same figures as were previously approved under FLD2009-09032. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum setback requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The development proposal includes a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 1.4 feet (to building), side (north) setbacks of 0.2 feet (to building) and 0.9 feet (to sidewalk), and a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building). These are the same setbacks as were previously approved under FLD2009-09032. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum allowable height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. The proposed building is 59.5 feet to the highest parking deck, which is the same height as was previously approved under FLD2009- 09032. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall be as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The development proposal includes the provision of 344 off-street parking spaces. Of these spaces, 44 are to specifically serve the proposed retail and restaurant uses, while the remaining 300 will be for public parking. The figures represent a reduction of five (5) off-street parking spaces from that which was previously approved. It is noted that the five (5) eliminated off- street parking spaces have come from those set-aside for the retail and restaurant use and not from the pool of public parking spaces. Community Development Board - February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 3 of 8 During development of the building permit plans (and subsequent reviews by the City and our Parking Consultant) the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant off-street parking spaces were relocated north of the elevators. This provided a net loss of four (4) parking spaces due to the clearance requirements of the door which accessed the north stair tower. In addition, a parking space in the employee parking area needed to be removed to meet the required vertical clearance and to improve the functionality of the parking space. The resulting number of off- street parking spaces (344) is still within the low/high off-street parking space requirement range provided in the revised Parking Reduction Study. The Study has been reviewed by Traffic Engineering and the Planning Departments and been found to be acceptable. Mechanical Equipment: As a part of this development proposal, the applicant intends to construct a surf machine within the retail space that will provide a full interactive experience for customers. To accomplish this, a necessary mechanical equipment room is proposed adjacent to the north stair tower. The surf machine requires filtration equipment and chemicals (chlorine) to maintain the cleanliness of the water, and its own HVAC equipment to remove latent chlorine and provide fresh conditioned air. Along with the dedicated HVAC equipment, the proposed mechanical equipment room will also house the filtration equipment and power controller. The only access to the room will be from the egress sidewalk located along the northwest corner of the structure. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveway on Coronado Drive, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20- foot sight visibility triangles. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this development will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. It is unknown of the location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this development. If located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscaping: The landscape plan remains largely unchanged from the prior approval with only relatively minor changes occurring in plant material quantities. The landscape plan complies with all applicable requirements of Article 3, Division 12 of the CDC, as well as those deviations granted by the Board previously through the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize roll out dumpsters for trash removal. Dumpsters will be located within the truck loading area behind metal screening doors. On trash days, the dumpsters will be staged in front of the truck loading area. Should the number of dumpsters be inadequate to handle the trash demand of the retail sales and restaurant uses, or should the storage area for the dumpsters be of inadequate size, any additional dumpsters will need to be located within a properly screened area acceptable to the City to avoid unsightly views. This proposal remains Community Development Board - February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 4 of 8 unchanged from the prior approval which was found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Beach by Desizn Guidelines: The prior development proposal was found to be compliant with Sections C.1, C.2, C.3, and CA and the proposal currently before the Board remains substantially consistent with that proposal with the exception of Section C.2. Section C.2 requires no, plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. All fagades of the building have been designed in compliance with this requirement, with the largest linear dimension of approximately 99 feet along the eastern portion of the north facade. All other portions of the building facade are modulated with at least a five-foot deviation, whether along the street frontages or on the north or south sides of the building. However, the graphic banner proposed along the west elevation is mounted at the front of the required building recess and effectively obscures the recess. As such, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits that the graphic banner must be fully set back within the recess in order to comply with this requirement. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Tables 2-802 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 1.0 43,025 square feet (0.99) X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.94 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 43,543 sq. ft. X Minimum Lot Width N/A Gulfview: 180 feet X Coronado: 174 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A West: Zero feet (to building) X East: 1.4 feet (to building) X Side: N/A North: 0.2 feet (to building) 0.9 feet (to sidewalk) X South: Zero feet (to building) X Maximum Height N/A 59.5 feet (to highest parking deck) X Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A 344 parking spaces x (44 Retail/Restaurant; 300 public) Community Development Board -February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 5 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annrMriate distances between buildings. Inconsistent Community Development Board - February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 6 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of January 6, 2011, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.99-acre subject property is located between S. Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive, approximately 200 feet south of Third Street; 2. That the proposal includes the construction of 34,007 square feet of retail sales and services floor area (and Beach Walk Thru Area), 9,018 square feet of restaurant floor area, and a 344 space parking garage (44 spaces for the retail sales and services and restaurant uses, and 300 public parking spaces); 3. That the proposed setbacks are consistent with those previously approved by the CDB as part of FLD2009-09032; 4. That the proposed building height is consistent with that previously approved by the CDB as part of FLD2009-09032; 5. That the proposed 344 off-street parking spaces constitutes a reduction of 5 spaces from the prior approval, which is supported by a Parking Reduction Study; 6. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property; and 7. That a companion Second Amendment to the Development Agreement (DVA2010-12001) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda, which provides for specific parameters of the project. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2-801.1, 2-802 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2-803.C; . The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including x visual acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 5SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Board -February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 -Page 7 of 8 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit Retail Sales and Services of 34,007 square feet of floor area (and Beach Walk Thru Area), a Restaurant of 9,018 square feet of floor area and a Parking Garage of 344 parking spaces (including 44 accessory parking spaces for the Retail Sales and Services and Restaurant uses and 300 public parking spaces) with a lot area of 43,543 square feet, a lot width of 180 feet on S. Gulfview Blvd (west) and 174 feet on Coronado Drive (east), a front (west) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 1.4 feet (to building), a side (north) setback of 0.2 feet (to building) and 0.9 feet (to sidewalk), a side (south) setback of zero feet (to building), a building height of 59.5 feet (to highest parking deck) and 344 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of the Community Development Code Section 2-803.C, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2010-12001); 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the architectural elevations approved by the CDB; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, all site data and calculations denoted on the plans are revised to be consistent and correct; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans are revised so that the graphic banner is fully set back within the recess on the west elevation; 6. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an easement be recorded for that portion of the deceleration lane and the public sidewalk that is located on the subject property; 7. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) located exterior to the building where visible from adjacent roadways, be painted the same color as the building; 8. That, in the event the number of dumpsters be inadequate to handle the trash demand of this development and/or the storage area for the dumpsters be of inadequate size, any additional dumpsters be located within a properly screened area acceptable to the City; and 9. That an emergency power source be included in the parking garage and be designed to provide power for all garage lighting, one elevator and the parkin access and revenue control system. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Robert G: Tefft, " Development Review Manager ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs S: IPlanningDepartmen6CD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIGu?iew S311 Surf Style (7) 2011 02-15 - RTStaffReport 2011 02-15.docx Community Development Board -February 15, 2011 FLD2010-12033 - Page 8 of 8 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefftAmvelearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ¦ Development Review Manager City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present Direct Development Review activities for the City. Supervise professional planners, land resource specialists and administrative staff. Conduct performance reviews. Serve as staff to the Community Development Board. ¦ Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ¦ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. ¦ Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida PAPAYA ST C q a -1 lif ° z z ? z _ Ptcr6o o Cat35@W-ay BI4'tl PROJECT SITE s'Ecorvo? °?uQ ST DR THtRD ST X t ER1GHT WA R DR F(FT}{ S,` co Q BAYSIDE Z? - °R 6a YI?k s e LOCATION MAP Owner: L.O.M. Inc. Cases: FLD2010-12033 D V A20 1 0-1 200 1 Site: 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard and Property Size: 0.99 acre 320 Coronado Drive PIN: 07-29-15-52380-000-0600 Atlas Page: 276A 07-29-15-52380-000-1 100 98 N 207 d CA 212 C y h ° n r 209LDCTR 1<_TI 217 213 218 Q ^^ti 216 SECOND ST Q 221 ° ^^ O 224 22 R 229 301 THIRD ST 251 301 300 P 305 305 309 309 311 31 315 316 315 316 9LDCTR 317 6 320 319 326 321 323 P 326 3 25 3 332 T 327 325 1 331 330 333 332 333 333 Q, 347 341 BRIG 0 0 0 HT w OSIR 347 343 342 A TER DR 345 345 351 348 346 347 355 353 346 5 FIFTH ST 350 0 ZONING MAP Owner: L.O.M. Inc. Cases: FLD20 1 0-1 2033 DVA2010-12001 Site: 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard and Property Size: 0.99 acre 320 Coronado Drive PIN: 07-29-15-52380-000-0600 Atlas Page: 276A 07-29-15-52380-000-1100 l s V c Owner: L.O.M. Inc. Cases: rLULU i u- i Lu.S.S DVA2010-12001 Site: 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard and Property Size: 0.99 acre 320 Coronado Drive PIN: 07-29-15-52380-000-0600 Atlas Page: 276A 07-29-15-52380-000-1 100 View looking northeast from Beach Walk at subject property 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard FLD2010-12033/DVA2010-12001 Page 1 of 2 i -Ii - - Mihoi, wool" View looking southeast from S. Gulfview Blvd./Beach Walk at subject property (Hyatt/Aqualea on left) View looking northeast from S. Gulfview Blvd./Beach Walk View looking north along Beach Walk (subject property on right; Hyatt/Aqualea in background) View looking west from Coronado Drive at subject property View looking northwest along west side of Coronado Drive (subject property in foreground; Hyatt/Aqualea in background) 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard FLD2010-12033/DVA2010-12001 Page 2 of 2 View looking northeast along the east side of Coronado Drive north of the subject property View looking southeast along the east side of Coronado Drive south of the subject property View looking southwest along the west side of Coronado Drive at development south of the subject property View looking east from S. Gulfview Blvd. (Beach Walk) at hotel directly south of subject property (325 S. Gulfview Blvd.) View looking north along Coronado Drive north of subject property (Hyatt/Aqualea on left) View looking northeast along east side of S. Gulfview Blvd. (subject property on right; Hyatt/Aqualea in background) IV r- Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 b SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 10 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets Irk SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ki SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1.205'5.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07111/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed L.O.M., Inc. 4100 N. 28th Terrace, Hollywood, FL 33020 954-926-6666 FAX NUMBER: 954-926-5434 EMAIL: avi1l1)surf-stvla_cnm L.O.M., Inc. AGENT NAME: Andrew Goulish, PE / Finfrock Construction, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 2400 Apopka Blvd, Apopka, FL 32703 PHONE NUMBER: 407-293-4000 FAX NUMBER: 407-367-2468 CELL NUMBER: 407-402-3797 EMAIL: agoullsh0finfri B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202A) PROJECT NAME: Surf-Style Parking Garage PROJECT VALUATION: $ 10,7$7,( STREET ADDRESS 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard & 320 Coronado Boulevard PARCEL NUMBER(S): 07-29-15-52380-000-0600 & 07-29-15-52380-000-1100 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.99 Acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 43,543 SF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A PROPOSED USE(S): 344 space parking garage, retail store and restaurant DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Attachment B Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UN DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FLD2009-09032 C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) j4 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP],,, page 7) D. h 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain ow each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attachment C 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) b Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain b m each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Attachment D 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Attachment D 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Attachment D 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Attachment D 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use Is permitted In this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Attachment D 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. a. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See Attachment D C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\pianning dept forms 0708\Comprehensivs Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3of8 E. STORMWATER PLAN Manual and 4-202.A.21) ENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stonmwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicableSPpeeurbmii t??eeedyydii during 1 tg ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial on ?oYtHa Rolf s? AJG Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stonnwater plan Is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) X SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ?l TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; i TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (is. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24° x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening - (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtentlabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED 37,264 sf(0.85 ac) 10,000 sf(0.22 ac) 43,543 sf(0.99 ac) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEE ATTACHMENT B SEE PARKING STUDY PROVIDED 18,316 sf 5,934 sf 18' above BFE 59.5' above BFE 0.80 0.95 MAX 0,94 0.35 1.0 MAX 0.99 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfiliing, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. A REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Previously submitted and approved under FLD 2009-09032 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) A BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials A REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/1 X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) I All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All existing signage will be removed. O All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) O Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). TO be submitted at a later date. O Reduced signage proposal (8'% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or Ns!her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • W11 generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour a nd/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will effect a nearby roadway segment and/or Intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the Ciys annual list of most hazardous intersections. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared In accordance with a 'Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727.5624750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. X Acknowledgement of traffic Impact study requirements (Applicant must Initial one of the following): AJG Traffic Impact Study is included- The study must Include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement et all intersections Identified In the Scoping Meeting. _ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 662- 4750. L. FIRE FLAW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine d any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump Is required the water supply must be abte to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to Include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, WPA 20, NFPA 281, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) Is required. Acknowledgement of fire Row ealeulallons/waler study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the follov,tng): Fire Flow CaloulationsMlatet Study is Included, AJG Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study is not required, NOTE: SUBMITTED WITH ORIGINAL FLD2009-09032 CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS) WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these tegUirememts, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 582-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best or my knowledge 'and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application- Signature of property owner ar en e STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF to ti? m to and subs Ibed before me this day of VIA I , XD, 24 to me anwor by I MAW- who is peersorta y known has produoed as Iderib ti , Notary public, - My commission expires: 1 'k U 1 t q C:lDocuments and Setlingslderek.fergusantDesktoptiplanNng dept forms 0 lve Infl 0141QOe 07 doc Page 7 61 8 IfOUty?ENtl o of ram Ibf ?rOdlti. flagira iJ?o iO, !dole CottwlNt>uNgt 0041114 Ighl lwfOtl11111. WW 111" A"L N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: I Provide names of all property ovmers on deed - PRINT full names; L.O.M., INC. 2 That (I arn0 a are) the owner(s) and reoord title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): _ 311 GULFVIEW BLVD. & 320 CORONADO DRIVE T That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT APPLICATION MODIFICATION 4 That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (doesfdo) appoint ANDREW J. GOULISH, PE as (Wheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5 That this afridavit has been executed to induce the City of Crearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described properly; 8. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application, 7. That (Ilwe). t rsigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. --- Prope Property Ebner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF 'brpj-&y2 Before me the undersigned, an officer duly comnllsskxwd by the taws of the State of Florida, on this 14 day of personally appeared -.yu (?? U AAr_ L-_ who having been fast duly sworn Deposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he:she signed. - - LAWN WEUS pvbk • we 41 IF1om • iyrDOfOat. ? Die >?l1t4 COtMt NOW • 0 41114 Notary Public Sign pure Notary Se 1{ M11111111 "Oww? My Commission Expires: () C:1Documents and Settingslderek ferguson%DesktopVtanning dept forms 0708%Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2408 07-lt,doc Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT W LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS & 35' VACATION OF GULFVIEW BLVD. R-O-W: PARCEL 1: Lot 110, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL 2: Lots 60, 61 and 62, and the Southerly one-half of Lot 107 and all of Lots 108 and 109, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the plot thereof as recorded in Plot Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: The Easterly 1/2 of Gulfview Boulevard lying West of and adjacent to the Westerly boundaries of Lots 60, 61 and 62, THE LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, as recorded in plot book 13 on pages 12 and 13 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northwest comer of said Lot 60; thence 180.12 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Lots 60, 61 and 62, and along the arc of a curve to the right with a radius of 6017.52 feet, subtended by a chord distance of 180.11 feet, bearing S0835'03"W to the Southwest comer of said Lot 62; thence N80'34'24"W along the Westerly extension of the Southerly boundary of said Lot 62, a distance of 35.00 feet to a point of intersection with the centerline of said Gulfview Boulevard, a 70 foot wide right of way, thence 179.08 feet along said centerline and along the arc of a curve to the left with a radius of 5982.52 feet, subtended by a chord distance of 179.08 feet, bearing N0835'03"E to a point of intersection with the Westerly extension of the Northerly boundary of said Lot 60; thence S8215WE a distance of 35.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Contains 6,286.20 square feet (0.144 acres), more or less. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS W/0 35' VACATION OF GULFVIEW BLVD. R-O-W: PARCEL 1: Lot 110, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL 2: Lots 60, 61 and 62, and the Southerly one-half of Lot 107 and all of Lots 108 and 109, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plot Book 13. Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 35' VACATION OF GULFVIEW BLVD. R-O-W: The Easterly 1 /2 of Gulfview Boulevard lying West of and adjacent to the Westerly boundaries of Lots 60, 61 and 62, THE LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, as recorded In plat book 13 on pages 12 and 13 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Lot 60; thence 180.12 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Lots 60, 61 and 62, and along the arc of a curve to the right with a radius of 6017.52 feet, subtended by a chord distance of 180.11 feet, bearing S0835'03"W to the Southwest comer of said Lot 62; thence N8034'24"W along the Westerly extension of the Southerly boundary of said Lot 62, a distance of 35.00 feet to a point of intersection with the centerline of said Gulfvlew Boulevard, a 70 foot wide right of way, thence 179.08 feet along said centerline and along the arc of a curve to the left with a radius of 5982.52 feet, subtended by a chord distance of 179.08 feet, bearing N08'35'03"E to a point of intersection with the Westerly extension of the Northerly boundary of sold Lot 60; thence S82'15'44"E a distance of 35.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Contains 6,286.20 square feet (0.144 acres), more or less. ATTACHMENT "B" FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT L.O.M., INC. SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE 311 S. GULFVIEW & 320 CORONADO DRIVE Description of Request: The applicant L.O.M., Inc. requests to modify the originally approved Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Case No. FLD 2009-09032 as follows: 1) Increase in Restaurant Area The Applicant proposes to increase the area of the Restaurant space by the addition of a mezzanine seating area and the lowering of the floor slab at the east side of the kitchen space to generate new area under the speed ramp utilized for cooler space. A detailed floor has been designed by Plisko Architecture and included in this modification request. In addition to the new mezzanine seating area, square footage that was allocated to the retail space in the previously approved Development Application has been reallocated to the Restaurant area during final design of the building. These portions of the building include the entirety of the egress corridor as it can no longer be accessed by the retail space due to the deletion of the interior hallway between the previous location of the bathrooms; and a portion of the storage mezzanine that was all previously allocated to the retail space. The overall width (north-south dimension) of the Restaurant was actually reduced by moving the common wall between the Retail and Restaurant spaces south several feet. The resultant of these revisions to the overall floor plan has increased the area of the Restaurant space from 6,887 square feet to 9,018 square feet, a net increase of 2, 131 square feet. Please refer to Sheets AC1 and AC2 for a comparison between the previously approved areas and the current proposed floor plans. 2) Addition of Exterior Mechanical Equipment Room The Applicant proposes to construct a Surf Machine within the Retail space that will provide a fully interactive surfing experience for customers. A Mechanical Equipment Room has been proposed on the adjacent to the north stair tower and increases the building footprint by 521 square feet. The Surf Machine requires filtration equipment and chemicals such as chlorine to maintain the cleanliness of the water. Therefore, this attraction has to be isolated from the remainder of the Retail space and requires its own HVAC equipment to remove latent chlorine in the Surf Machine space and provide fresh conditioned air. This unit is approximately 19 feet long, 8 feet wide, 8 feet tall and weighs approximately 10,000 lbs. The size and weight of this January 13, 2011 Attachment "B" Page 1 of 3 ? M unit combined with the ducting requirements make it infeasible to locate it within the garage structure itself. The unit is also designed to be in an enclosed structure due to its intended function. Along with this dedicated HVAC unit, the proposed Mechanical Equipment Room will also house the Filtration equipment and Power Controller. The only access to this Mechanical Equipment room will be from the egress sidewalk located along the northwest corner of the structure, and like the Surf machine will be isolated from the remainder of Retail space. This isolation makes this room a suitable and safe area to store the chemicals used by the Filtration equipment to maintain the water. While this additional square footage has been included as a part of the revised Retail space, given the changes described in Item 1 above and some additional square footage provided in the Beach Walk Thru, the area of the Retail space has reduced from 34,183 to 34,007 square feet. Please refer to Sheets AC1 and AC2 for a comparison between the previously approved areas and the current proposed floor plans. For the purposes of defining the "Retail Unit" that is referenced in the Development Agreement modification (DVA 2010-00001) and Parking Study, the Beach Walk Thru area of 3,796 square feet has been subtracted from the overall Retail space square footage providing a "Retail Unit" area of 30,211 square feet. The Beach Walk Thru is a 24 hour accessible pathway through the Retail space that provides connection for pedestrians and garage users from Coronado Drive to the Beach Walk Promenade. A folding partition system will be installed to secure the commercial portion of the space from the Beach Walk Thru after hours of operation. 3) Reduction in Parking Spaces Provided During development of the Building Permit Plans and subsequent reviews by the City of Clearwater and its Parking Consultant the ADA parking spaces were relocated north of the elevators. This provided a net loss of 4 parking spaces due to the clearance requirements of the door which accessed the north stair tower. In addition, a parking space in the employee parking area needed to be removed during final design to provide required vertical clearances and improve the functionality of the space. Therefore, this modification request includes the reduction of total parking spaces from the previously approved 349 to 344. This reduces the number of parking spaces provided for Public Parking from 301 to 300, for retail/restaurant customers from 24 to 21, and for retail/restaurant employees from 24 to 23. These reductions are still within the low/high parking space requirement range provided in the revised Parking Study provided with this modification request. 4) Revision of Exterior Colors A new exterior color palette has been submitted for approval that still conforms to the intent of the Beach by Design guidelines and utilizes a similar theme and accentuation as previously approved. Please see revised Sheets A401 and A402 for the new color palette. January 13, 2011 Attachment "B" Page 2 of 3 5) Revision of West Elevation Canopy and Artwork Structure The leading edge alignment of the Canopy located on the West Elevation has also been shown on the revised Sheet A401. The Canopy now extends 10 feet into the right-of-way occupied by the Beach Walk Promenade as allowed by the Beach by Design guidelines. In addition, the required Public Art structure located on the West Elevation has been vertically extended, moved forward to the front of the building recess and the mounting surface has been curved to provide it with more architectural interest. January 13, 2011 Attachment "B" Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT "C" FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT L.O.M., INC. SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE 311 S. GULFVIEW & 320 CORONADO DRIVE General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the City of Clearwater's public Beach Walk promenade. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project, through extension of a shell finish concrete sidewalk along Gulfview on the west side of the property and use of decorative pavers. Washington Palms and salt-tolerant landscaping will be added along Gulfview adjacent to the building. North: The property to the north is the new 150-foot tall Aqualea resort. East: The Property is bounded on the east by relocated Coronado Drive and further east is an area of smaller motels. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach by Design. South: The adjacent property to the south is occupied by an existing 5-story motel. The height will be relatively equivalent to the proposed project. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for projects. The project to the north is significantly higher than the proposed development. The existing motel to the south is relatively equal in height. The requested modifications do not adversely affect the project from complying with this requirement. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: a) Incorporation of public sidewalks around the property and linkages to the neighboring Hyatt Aqualea and Beach Walk. b) Construction which meets current building codes. January 13, 2011 Attachment "C" Page 1 of 4 c) Providing 300 public parking spaces to serve the public parking spaces + 23 employee spaces + 21 retail/restaurant spaces for a total of 344 spaces. Employee, retail and restaurant spaces will have appropriate signage and marking identifying uses. See Parking Study for greater detail. d) Extension of the existing promenade to the public parking spaces will allow pedestrians to access the beach from Coronado Drive by walking through the first level of the Surf-Style Parking Garage and walk across South Gulfview Boulevard to the Beach. e) The additional parking spaces will significantly reduce traffic congestion due to circling beach patrons looking for current limited parking. f) The guests of the proposed public parking stalls will be potential clientele for nearby restaurants and retail businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The City has completed construction of Beach Walk improvements along Coronado Drive, including concrete sidewalks on the east side of the site. The parking garage layout will enhance pedestrian flow along Coronado Drive by implementing a seven foot wide pedestrian concrete sidewalk. Traffic congestion will be significantly reduced based on item 2.a above. A deceleration lane into the parking garage will be constructed by the Applicant on the Coronado right-of-way for ease of entry to the parking garage, by general public. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. By providing a secure structure in which to locate the required mechanical equipment for the Surf machine included in this modification request the safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood will not be compromised. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Applicant has submitted a traffic study with the approved Case FLD2009-09032, to review potential impacts created by construction of the project based on a methodology agreed upon by the City staff, which was prepared by Elizabeth Rodriguez, AICP. There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion: a) The entrance to the parking garage will have 102 feet of stacking space along Coronado Drive, enough for six vehicles (seventeen feet in length) before entering the parking garage. January 13, 2011 Attachment "C" Page 2 of 4 This will allow adequate room for stacking of vehicles entering the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on Coronado. b) The site will contain 300 public parking spaces. An additional 23 spaces are provided for employee parking and 21 spaces for restaurant patrons. The public parking will be provided so that surrounding retail patrons and overnight visitors will not have to wait for spaces or circle the beach area looking for a parking space, therefore allowing traffic to flow smoothly into the parking garage off the public street. Parking stalls for employees, restaurant and retail patrons will be signed and marked appropriately. See Parking Study for greater detail. c) As shown on the proposed site plan, there is a loading/unloading area provided on the east side of the site. Delivery vehicles will be provided a space in the loading area, within the building envelope, that has access to Coronado Drive. This should keep delivery vehicles from interfering with the traffic flow on Coronado Drive. Solid waste pick-up will also be accessed on Coronado Drive. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within the "Beach Walk District" of Clearwater Beach. The project will function as a parking garage for the "Beach Walk District." The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Beach Walk District" with the inclusion of a restaurant and retail store, which Beach by Design describes as an area that necessitates the renovation and redevelopment of the existing structures in order to create the primary beachfront destination of Clearwater Beach. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west separating the site from Gulfview Boulevard and public beach is the City's Beach Walk. The Applicant is incorporating the Beach Walk improvements into the property and providing improvements in the City right-of-way to the west of the property as envisioned by Beach by Design, including a shell finish concrete sidewalk, with Washington palms and salt-tolerant plantings along the face of the building. The Applicant proposes pedestrian access improvements to Beach Walk including a pedestrian pass through access in the center of the building providing access from Coronado Drive to the Promenade. The pass through will also provide access to the retail use. The parcel to the north is occupied by the Hyatt Aqualea construction site with a proposed height of 150' (above BFE). The proposed project is of a superior architectural design to the previously existing buildings and incorporated Beach by Design guidelines therefore enhancing the surrounding properties. To the east are small-scaled overnight accommodation uses. January 13, 2011 Attachment "C" Page 3 of 4 The proposed improvements to the property include sidewalks around the building that connect to the Beach Walk and provide pedestrians seamless access north and south along Gulfview and Coronado. The adjacent property to the south is occupied by an existing 5-story motel. The height will be relatively equivalent to the proposed project. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this section of Beach Walk and South Clearwater Beach. The architectural style integrates a tropical modern design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. The requested modifications to the west elevation canopy and artwork structure will enhance the visual appeal of the original design. All proposed parking is within a fully enclosed parking structure, thereby minimizing any visual and olfactory impacts on the surrounding properties. Adequate loading/unloading space and sufficient stacking space at the main vehicular entrance of the property will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from the beach to the site or other properties to the south. Access to the restaurant and retail on the Gulf front (westerly) side of the property will be pedestrian access only. In addition, the location of the required mechanical equipment within an enclosed structure will limit any noise that may be generated by this equipment. January 13, 2011 Attachment "C" Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT "D" FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT L.O.M., INC. SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE 311 S. GULFVIEW & 320 CORONADO DRIVE Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1) The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The project requests are primarily limited to building setbacks in order to include the proposed 300 public parking spaces in a reasonable geometric fashion within the footprint, and reduce an excessively high parking garage. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal and without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a complementary/supporting use to the surrounding resort/tourist areas is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design. Height The request for 59.50' when 100' is allowed by Code is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design and the City LDC. Parking The Applicant has requested relief from Code parking requirements for the retail and restaurant uses. The retail and restaurant uses within the parking garage will be primarily used by pedestrian traffic along the Promenade or visitors staying in surrounding hotels. This pattern is evident with the existing Surf Style retail store and Britt's restaurant. In addition, the parking garage will maintain 300 minimum public spaces available to visitors in this area. Setbacks The project is seeking relief from building and pavement setbacks along the four property lines. The setbacks are consistent with the Hyatt Aqualea project immediately north of the project, January, 13, 2011 Attachment "D" Page 1 of 7 which brings the storefronts closer to the public sidewalks as encouraged in the tourist district the side setback is consistent with the existing side setbacks to the north and south of the property; however a pedestrian access has been introduced into the project along Coronado Drive to allow pedestrian beach access through the building. This access corridor will allow pedestrians to have a shorter distance, a safer route and direct access to the beach from Coronado Drive. Sight Visibility Triangles The project complies with sight triangle requirements. Direct Access to an Arterial The property is addressed from Coronado and traditionally has had a primary Coronado address. As such, the parcel is bounded on only one side with vehicular access. The proposed site plan provides for a parking garage entrance on the easterly side of the building on Coronado. Vehicles will enter a right turn lane that extends to the garage entrance, where vehicles enter and exit the proposed parking garage. A Coronado address shall be obtained for the property. 2) The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The project provides a large scale parking garage that is contemplated within Beach by Design to help alleviate parking concerns and beach traffic congestion. 3) The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will encourage additional appropriate development by reducing the current parking concerns and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. The architectural design wraps the parking garage with a fagade designed to look like the newer construction along the beach including the color banding decorative medallions, glass storefront and parking garage openings along the east and west facades resembling window openings. 4) Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by Beach Walk and the Gulf of Mexico. January 13, 2011 Attachment "D" Page 2 of 7 r South: To the south is an existing 5 story motel similar in height to the proposed project. The two projects are compatible in mass and setbacks. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller motels. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. North: The adjacent property to the north is occupied by the Hyatt Aqualea Resort, which is 150' in height and of similar scale to the proposed project. The proposed project incorporates sidewalks that allow pedestrians to walk seamlessly between north and south to Pier 60. The parking garage will enhance adjoining properties and the beach area by providing additional parking for current needs and future development. The first floor will include retail and restaurant storefronts offering tourists and local visitors shopping and eating opportunities while visiting Beach Walk. 5) The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. a. Parking garages, restaurants, and retail area all permitted used within the RFH land use and Tourist zoning district. 6) Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives. a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. January 13, 2011 Attachment "D" Page 3 of 7 The proposed use is a use permitted within the Tourist zoning district. Surrounding properties area already developed or under development. The Aqualea property to the north is not impacted. The existing properties to the north and south as approved includes hotel and condominium use whereas the proposed Surf Style Parking Garage project focuses only on tourist activities and provides public parking which eliminates traffic congestion and allows pedestrians to walk to other establishments. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the city. This project furthers the City's beach revitalization objective by providing the Beach by Design contemplation for a parking garage located within the south beach area. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale and mass criteria: Beach by Design VII, B Height and Tower Separation The project consists of one building that is 59.5' above BFE in height measured from FEMA to the top of the main roof deck, furthermore the requested modification does not add to the overall height of the building. Therefore, the tower separation criterion does not apply to this project. B.3 "The floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty five feet in height is limited as follows: a) The largest floor plate between 34' and 100' exceeds 24,000 square feet and is approximately 29,531 square feet. Beach by Design Section B.3a gives an exception to parking structures open to the public. The requested increase in internal Restaurant area by increasing the size of the mezzanine does not affect the previously approved deviation provided by Beach by Design. The square footage added to the building's overall footprint for the Mechanical Equipment Room required for the Water Attraction is located at the ground level and does not affect the previously approved deviation of this requirement provided by Beach by Design. See below for discussion of mass and scale and an explanation of how the project provides a tiered effect thereby justifying such deviation. Beach by Design VII C January 13, 2011 Attachment "D" Page 4 of 7 C6 4' Y The quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by Design: • No plane (or elevation) of the project "...continue(s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred feet (100'.) The addition of the Mechanical Equipment Room to the North Elevation does not affect the project's compliance with this requirement as it preserves the previously provided deviations in the north, west and east elevation planes. • At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with window or architectural decoration. The addition of the Mechanical Equipment Room to the North Elevation does not alter the project's prior compliance with this requirement as it does not remove or alter any previously provided window or architectural decoration. As the additional restaurant square footage does not impact the exterior size of the building, this modification does not affect the prior approval. • No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 42' will be occupied by a building. The roofline of the added Mechanical Equipment Room is lower than 42' and therefore does not affect the prior approval of the project in regard to this requirement. As the additional restaurant square footage does not impact the exterior size of the building, this modification does not affect the prior approval. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed Surf-Style project's scale with the requested modification will still be less dense than that of the Hyatt Aqualea, which was recently completed. At 59.5' above BFE, the scale and intensity of the development is far less than that of the Hyatt Aqualea and Kiran Grande projects north of the site. The architectural style and compliance with design guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design, even with approval of the requested modification. In addition, the requested modification to include the Mechanical Equipment Room on the North Elevation is in concert with the project's "modern tropical architecture" which compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. January 13, 2011 Attachment "D" Page 5 of 7 . 4u 4 d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements; • Changes in horizontal building planes, The requested modification does not impact the compliance of the project with this requirement as previously provided changes in horizontal building planes are unaffected. On the contrary the Public Art on the West Elevation proposed in this modification has been vertically extended and moved to the outward of the west elevation plane by incorporating a curved plane on which the artwork will be mounted which adds a unique dimension to the architectural interest of the building. • Use of architectural details such as cornices, medallions, awnings, columns, etc.; All previously approved architectural details are preserved with the incorporation of the requested modification, with the exception of the west elevation. This modification details the vertical extension of the Public Art component and has introduced a new curved surface on which the artwork is mounted. In addition, the canopy over the main entrance has been extended ten feet beyond the property line as allowed by Beach by Design to accentuate the entrance of the building and define the pedestrian path. • Variety in materials, colors and textures, Changes to the previously approved exterior colors have been included in this modification request, however the previously approved distribution of and accentuation by the various colors have been preserved. In addition the currently proposed colors are complementary to those contemplated by the Beach by Design guidelines. • Distinctive fenestration patterns; The requested modifications do not impact the previously approved elements of the building which allow the project to meet this requirement. • Building stepbacks, The requested modifications do not impact the previously approved elements of the building which allow the project to meet this requirement. • Distinctive roofs forms; January 13, 2011 Attachment "D" Page 6 of 7 ,9 The requested modifications do not impact the previously approved elements of the building which allow the project to meet this requirement. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings; The requested modifications do not impact the previously approved elements of the building which allow the project to meet this requirement, as the location of the new Mechanical Equipment Room had previously been identified as a less than ideal location for significant landscaping due to the proximity of the adjacent Hyatt Aqualea and its lack of visibility from the public space. January 13, 2011 Attachment "D° Page 7 of 7 PARKING REDUCTION STUDY FOR SURF STYLE / BRITTS CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: FINFROCK CONSTRUCTION, INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. REVISED JANUARY 2011 PROJECT # 09-032 Robert Perg AICP, PTP AICP #9023, ??P #133 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes to modify a previously approved redevelopment on a 1 acre site to include restaurant spaces, retail space and a parking garage that will be open to the public. The application was previously approved by the Community Development Board on December 15, 2009 (FLD2009-09032), however, minor changes to increase the restaurant space and decrease the retail space require a re- evaluation. The parking garage will contain 344 spaces of which 300 would be open to the public and therefore not counted towards the required parking supply. The site is located at 311 S. Gulfview Boulevard and 320 Coronado Drive and currently contains the Surf Style Beachwear store, Britts Laguna Grill restaurant and a small parking area containing 27 spaces (see Figure 1). The property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district which requests a reduction in required parking, to accommodate the proposed 9,018 square feet of restaurant space, and enclosed retail building space. This request requires an assessment of the parking characteristics of the redevelopment. There will be walk-through area that will not have kiosks, will not generate any parking demand and therefore will not be included in the required parking calculation. The total retail space is 30,211 square feet. Based on City of Clearwater requirements, on-site parking should include 7-15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of restaurant space, and 4-5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space. This would result in a code requirement of 184-286 total parking spaces (63-135 for the restaurant, and 121-151 for the retail). Per Section 3-1405 "Shared Parking" of the Community Development Code the peak shared parking requirement is 172-271 spaces between 6PM and Midnight on weekdays, and normal weekday parking would be 117-174 parking spaces as shown in Table 1. The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. City of Clearwater staff has recognized the property is located in close proximity to Clearwater Beach, hotels, and condominium developments with a great potential for "walk- up" customers. Staff also recognizes the available public parking in nearby lots serves two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide parking for beach related businesses. The applicant believes the reconstruction of retail space and a small restaurant would not significantly alter parking demand and parking demand of beach related businesses is significantly lower than that of businesses elsewhere in the city. This parking study will serve to calculate that demand in a reasonable manner. 1 Q W w a C7 v PROJECT - LOCATION I PROJECT LOCATION - SURF STYLE IPROJECTNO: ' 09-032 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: Land Development Consulting 102009 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. FIGURE: 1 TABLE -1 Surf-Style Mixed-Use Structure Shared Parking Table (No Reductions) Land Use Area (sf) Weekday 12-6 AM Weekday 9AM-4PM Weekday 6PM-12AM Weekend 9AM-4PM Weekend 6-12 PM High - 5 spaces/1,000 sf 5% 8 70% 1 6 136 - 100% - 151 _ 70% _ 106 Retail 30,211 Low - 4 spaces/1,000 sf 5% 6 70% 7 109 100% 121 70% 85 High - 15 spaces/1,000 sf 10% 14 50% 135 50% 68 100% 135 staurant Re 9,018 Low - 7 spaces/1,000 sf 10% 6 50% 63 50% 32 100% 63 High 22 174 271 219 241 Total Low 12 117 172 153 148 Surf-Style Mixed-Use Structure Shared Parking Table (22 Employees, 11% Site-Specific Customer Demand) Land Use Area (sf) Weekday 12-6 AM Weekday 9AM-4PM Weekday 6PM-12AM Weekend 9AM-4PM Weekend 6-12 PM High - 5 spaces/1,000 sf 5% 8 70% 106 90% 136 100% 151 70% 106 Retail 30,211 Low - 4 spaces/1,000 sf 5% 6 70% 85 90% 109 100% 121 70% 85 High -15 spaces/1,000 sf 10% 14 50% 68 100% 135 50% 68 100% 135 Restaurant 9,018 Low - 7 spaces/1,000 sf 10% 6 50% 32 100% 63 50% 32 100% 63 High 22 174 271 219 241 Subtotal Low 12 117 172 153 148 Site-Specific Customer High 0 17 27 22 24 Demand* Low 0 10 17 14 14 Actual Parking High 22 39 49 44 46 Demand Total** Low 22 32 39 36 36 *Subtract 22 Spaces required by Employees, Utilize 11% of Remaining Demand ** Include 22 Spaces required by Employees II. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT The City of Clearwater has requested a detailed analysis estimating the number of parking spaces actually needed to service the proposed redevelopment based on site specific operations. The parking demand is a combination of employees and customers. Based on data provided by the applicant the site will have 44 spaces reserved for employees and customers. The normal business hours will be 9 AM- 10 PM, however, these may be extended during the tourist season to 8 AM - 10 PM. The businesses will have a total of 27 employees. In past parking studies prepared for hotels and businesses on Clearwater Beach the percentage of employees using cars to commute to work ranges from 40% - 80%. The 80% figure has been generally accepted given the opportunities for employees to take a bus, ride the trolley, or bike or walk to work. As such the employee parking would be 22 spaces. Customer parking requirements will vary however, beachwear stores and casual restaurants typically rely on their proximity to the beach for walk-up customers. In addition, the existence of surrounding hotels, and condominiums, each with their own parking, provide customers to these businesses without generating a need for an additional parking space. Existing customer parking characteristics were established by conducting customer surveys during normal business hours during the week of October 7 -11, 2009. During this time period a total of 329 surveys were completed. The customer survey form is provided in the Appendix. This survey was distributed at three of the Surf Style brand retail stores owned and operated by the applicant on Clearwater Beach, as well as Britt's restaurant on the subject site. One of the three retail stores included in the survey is located at 442 Mandalay Avenue (Store #110) and was designed, permitted and constructed without any dedicated parking spaces, and has been in operation since 2003. Store 9110 exemplifies the concept that the Surf Style stores "capture" customers that have already traveled to the beach for some other purpose (ie: visit the beach, attend a wedding, etc.) in that this store has the greatest revenue of all 4 stores owned and operated by the applicant on Clearwater Beach, yet it does not have dedicated customer parking. In addition, the applicant owns a total of 24 stores that are located in similar beachfront communities such as Melbourne Beach, Panama City Beach, and Destin, Florida; Gulf Shores, Alabama and Biloxi, Mississippi. These stores are not destination shopping centers, but rather a convenience for visitors to the beach to purchase beachwear and souvenirs. Likewise, the existing Britt's restaurant is predominantly a casual dining establishment frequented by those visiting the beach for some other purpose than exclusively to dine. The premise that these establishments "capture" existing beach visitors is further evidenced by the fact that on average 75% to 80% of the annual revenues are generated at this site during the peak tourist months of March through August. 2 Main reason for visiting Clearwater Beach Of the 329 people surveyed, 217 (66%) responded their main purpose for visiting Clearwater Beach was "to go to the beach", 36 (11%) specifically made the trip to come to Britts/Surf Style, and 76 (23%) were at Clearwater Beach for "other reasons", such as a wedding, vacation, visiting friends, sight-seeing, shopping, honeymoon, seminar, volleyball tournament, convention, work, and "check out possible wedding reception locations". Mode of transportation Of the 329 people surveyed, 203 (62%) drove a car to the beach that day, 112 (34%) were staying at a local hotel on the beach, and 14 (4%) used another mode of transportation including beach trolley, taxi-cab, bike, or walking. As a result a total of 315 respondents (96%) had access to a car while on Clearwater Beach, and either parked in a public lot, on-street spaces, hotel/condo, or in the Britts/Surf Style private parking lot. Location of parking Of the 315 survey respondents that had access to a car requiring a parking space, 119 (38%) parked in a public parking lot, 160 (51%) either parked in an on-street space, parked at their hotel, or at their condo. Only 36 (11%) actually used the private parking lot reserved for Britts/ Surf Style customers. III. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted based upon actual customer surveys and reasonable assumptions regarding the parking characteristics of retail space and restaurant space. The shared parking requirement for the retail/restaurant is 172-271 spaces and it has been established 22 spaces would be used by employees. The remaining 150-249 spaces would theoretically serve customers. Based on the customer surveys, 11 % of the customers actually park in the private lot, therefore the customer parking requirement would be reduced to 17-27 spaces. The total recommended parking supply for the redevelopment is 39-49 parking spaces, excluding the 300 public parking spaces. The parking lot redevelopment proposes 44 parking spaces for the project (23 employee, 21 customer) and makes improvements to the appearance of the property while providing 300 public parking spaces. The existing Britts/ Surf Style businesses presently occupying space are not heavy parking generators. The redeveloped Britts/ Surf Style and other future businesses are not expected to be heavy parking generators either. Therefore the parking demand can be reduced as compared to the shared parking table. Since the proposed 44 parking spaces is within the range of the recommended 39-49 spaces, 3 this analysis demonstrates operations can be accommodated with the proposed 44 on-site parking spaces and justifies a reduction from the code-required 172-271 spaces. APPENDIE A To view the most current version, visit www.municode.com. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS § 3-1405 Section 3-1405. Shared parking. ------ --- ---- (' Low j } OFFICE j -•-•- .................... ..J SNARED PARKING shared parking diagram 121 WEEKDAY WEEKEND USE Night Midnight 6 a.m. Day 9 a. m. 4 p.m. Evening 6 p. m. Midnight Day 9 a. m. 4 p.m. Evening 6 p. m. Midnight Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90% Government 5% 100% 0% 00/0 0% Office and Marinas 5% 100% 10% 10% 5% Retail ( 5% g'F 70% I O el 90% (21 100% Z !?,- 70% Overnight Accommodations 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% Restaurant (p 10% -?,?? 50% 100% 2_ 50% 100% Entertainment 10% 40% 100% 80% 100% Places of Worship 0% 20% 10% 100% 20% Others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% When any land, building or area is used for two or more uses which are listed below, the minimum total number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following: Multiply the minimum required parking spaces for each individual use, excluding spaces reserved for J( use by specified individuals or classes of individuals, by the appropriate percentage listed in the Table supp. No. 25 CD3:57 Supplement 25, December 2009 To view the most current version, visit www.municode.com. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS § 3-1405 Section 3-1405. Shared parking. shared parking diagram ?5( WEEKDAY WEEKEND USE Night Midnight 6 a. m. Day 9 a.m. 4 p.m. Evening 6 p.m. Midnight Day 9 a.m. 4 p. m. Evening 6 p.m. Midnight Residential 100% 60% 90% 80% 90% Government 5% 100% 0% 0% 0% Office and Marinas 5% 100% 10% 10% 5% Retail ?j 5% ,C) t? 70% 3(Q 90% ` 100% 70% Overnight Accommodations 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% Restaurant 14 10% ?? 50% 100% (?$ 50% ., 7100% Entertainment 10% 40% 100% 80% 100% Places of Worship 0% 20% 10% 100% 20% Others 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% When any land, building or area is used for two or more uses which are listed below, the minimum total number of required parking spaces shall be determined by the following: Multiply the minimum required parking spaces for each individual use, excluding spaces reserved for use by specified individuals or classes of individuals, by the appropriate percentage listed in the Table ZZ t?? t?Zl Z19 2-41 Supp. No. 25 CD3:57 Supplement 25, December 2009 Customer Survey Britts / Surf Style (Circle One) Thank you for your business. In order to better serve you in the future we request you please answer the following questions regarding parking usage. 1. What was your main purpose for visiting Clearwater Beach today? a. Go to the beach b. Specifically to come to this business establishment c. Other (please specify) 2. Did you drive your car to the beach today? a. Yes b. No staying at a local hotel c. Other (ie. Bus, bike, trolley) 3. If you did drive a car to the beach today, where did you park? a. Public Parking lot b. Parked at another location (on-street parking space or at hotel) c. Parked here in the private parking lot for this business DRAINAGE REPORT FOR Surf Style Parking Garage LOCATED AT: 311 Gulfview Blvd. & 320 Coronado Dr. Clearwater, Florida 33767 PREPARED FOR: Finfrock Construction, Inc. PO Box 607754 Orlando, Florida 32860 PREPARED BY: P, Pickett engineering 475 South First Avenue, Bartow, FL 33830 Phone: (863) 533-9095 SUBMITTED TO: City of Clearwater submitted: October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS STORMWATER NARRATIVE ................ • Summary • Existing Conditions • Proposed Conditions • Treatment Volume • Attenuation Criteria • Engineer's Certification CURVE NUMBER - "C" CONVERSION ........ ...................................................Chapter 1 ................... Chapter 2 CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION ...................................................................... Chapter 2 TREATMENT VOLUME ......................................................................................... Chapter 3 • Required Treatment Volume • MODRET Drawdown/Recovery ATTENUATION ..................................................................................................... Chapter 4 • MODRET Existing Runoff Hydrograph • MODRET Proposed Runoff Hydrograph • MODRET Proposed Runoff Hydrograph Routed Through Vault (incorporating infiltration analysis) • Flow Over Rectangular Weir Calculations OPERATION & MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTION .... Chapter 5 FF-1i CHAPTER 1 K STORMWATER NARRATIVE Summary Surf Style Parking Garage is a commercial development located between Coronado Drive and Gulfview Boulevard in Clearwater, Florida. Pickett Engineering, Inc. has been retained to finalize the drainage design and obtain approval of the proposed improvements through the City of Clearwater. The system is designed to meet the rules and regulations concerning water quality and quantity as set forth by SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater. The enclosed report provides detailed engineering calculations to aid the construction plans, which propose to convey the storm water runoff to a dry detention vault located in the parking garage. The stormwater management facilities will be constructed in one phase. Exisffna Conditions The existing property size is approximately 0.85 acres and includes Britt's Laguna Grill and the Surf Style retail shop. The parcel contains 29,970 SF of impervious area including buildings, parking lots and sidewalks. The site currently does not have a stormwater management system and stormwater runoff sheet flows off the property to the Coronado Drive and the Gulfview Boulevard rights of way. The stormwater is not attenuated nor treated prior to discharge. Proposed Conditions The proposed development includes a 34,332 SF building and 6,557 SF of pavement within the property. After dedication by the City to the property owner of the western-most 35 feet of Gulfview Boulevard, the total property area will be 0.99 acres. The stormwater runoff is directed via roof drains and underground pipes to the stormwater vault located under the parking garage entrance ramp. Treatment Volume and Stormwater attenuation is provided within the stormwater vault. The vault has a bottom elevation of 2.80, a top elevation of 6.80 and a control structure set to elevation 4.05. Treatment Volume Per SWFWMD requirements, an additional 50% of Treatment Volume (TV) is required for projects discharging to Outstanding Florida Waters (OFWs) and brings the total required TV to 0.75" over the developable area. The required volume calculation is shown in Chapter 3 of this report. The required TV is retained below the control structure elevation, 4.05. The MODRET-Pollution Abatement Module is utilized to demonstrate that the TV recovers within 24 hours of loading. See Chapter 3 of this report. EO AttenvaHon Cdtedd The City of Clearwater requires attenuation for this project. Per City criteria, only 50% credit is allowed for existing impervious area. The remaining 50% impervious area is treated as pervious area with a rational "C" factor of 0.20. Chapter 2 of this report shows the conversion to CN value from rational c factors [c = 0.2 is equivalent to CN = 41 ]. The proposed runoff of 0.62 cfs, see Chapter 4, is calculated from taking the maximum water elevation within the vault for the 25-year / 24-hour event, 4.11 ft, and getting the water height of 0.06 feet above the weir. The corresponding flow is 0.62 cfs. This flow is less than the existing runoff of 4.04 cfs, which is taken from the existing hydrograph runoff, see Chapter 4. Flow over all four (4) sides of an FDOT Type E inlet yields a length of 15 ft, from [(2 x 4ft-6in) + (2 x 3ft)). Review of the above in conjunction with the enclosed items, indicates the storm water management system will function within the required criteria. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained in this report is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The stormwater management system has been designed to comply with City and other applicable agency criteria, and will not adversely impact adjacent existing properties. This report was prepared in accordance with sound engineering principles, and the recommendations and schedules were discussed with the owner's designated representative. Stephen L. Sloan, P.E. Florida Registration No. 58766 Pickett Engineering, Inc. PO Box 253 Bartow, FL 33831 863.533.9095 Date 10 CHAPTER 2 Curve Number vs. Runoff Coefficient Q Curvpe Nod=(CN) . 41.0 U In. Runoff Coef ident (ororc) • 0:211 S. 14 9l1 Curve Number Calculation reversion or =1 - (SIPT) X (12 - (S) / (PT + 0.8s)) Johnson and Meado,NS (1980) Where: or = Runoff Cceffident for Return Period T PT . Pre ipitalion / Rairrfal Depth far Retum Period T (inches) S = (1000/CN) -10 = Maxirntun Sol Storage (knchea) Existing Areas: Pr oposed Areas: Developabb Area: 37,264 of 43,543 sf Building Area: 11,654 of 34,327 sf AsphaMonars"isc.: 18,316 sf 6,557 sf Total Inpervsous Area: 29,970 of 40,884 sf Told Open Speow. 7,294 sf 2,859 of City of Clsarwsser requires aftenuation and allows a* credit for 50% of existing irnpervious area. The,snaking 501E aloft kTpwvious area is treated as pervious with a rational meltrod C • 0.2 (or CN . 41, eq AvJsnt - see " CN vs. Runoff Coeftident Conversion" above). CNew . (29,970 sfMX95) + (29,970 sf/2 + 7,294 sf + (43,543 sf - 37,264 sf)) (41) 59.58 43,543 sf DCIA.w= 29,970 sf DCIA w,%. DCIA.w 0.69 Total Area CNp _ (40.884)(95) + (2,659 sf) (41) 91.70 43,543 sf DCUe„v= 40,884 sf DCIAp"X. DCIA," 0.94 Total Area CHAPTER 3 EO SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE Water Quality Analysis Job #785 BASIN: 1 RETJDET. POND: Vault STAGE-AREA-STORAGE COMPUTATIONS: TOP OF POND: BOTTOM OF POND: AREA AT CWE: ELEV. AREA (FEET): (ACRES): 6.80 0.05 ***************** ********** 2.80 0.05 ACRES NOTE: AREAS BETWEEN CWE AND TOP ARE CALCULATED BY LINEAR INTERPOLATION @ ONE FOOT CONTOUR INTERVALS. STORAGE IS CALCULATED BY AVERAGING THE VOLUME WITHIN THE ONE FOOT INTERVALS, MULTIPLYING BY THE DEPTH IN FEET, AND THEN ACCUMULATE EACH OF THOSE VOLUMES FROM BOTTOM TO TOP. STAGE/ELEV. AREA STORAGE Fr-NGVD/MSL ACRES (AF) BOTTOM OF POND: 2.80 0.049 0.000 TREATMENT EL (WEIR) 4.05 0.049 0.062 TOP OF POND (DID: 6.80 0.049 0.197 REQ. TREATMENT VOLUME = DEV AREA x 0.75" (50% MORE TREAT. VOL REQ'D FOR DISCHARGE TO OFW) 0.9996 AC x 0.75 " = 0.062 AF SEE MODRET FOR DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS 43,543 SF x 0.75 " = 2721 CF Quality-Dry-1.x16 100 MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROTECT NAME : Surf Style Parking Garage-Treatment POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coeffident of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - YON Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barr kw - YON Elevation of Barrier Bottom 1,838.00 ft2 8,588.00 ft3 1.50 [x2.50 ft 2.20 ft 2.80 ft 2.80 ft 6.80 ft 0.05 18.50 ft/d 2.00 27.80 ft/d 0.20 1.00 TOP Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N Y Y 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 MODRET TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA PROIECT NAME: SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE-TREATMENT STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (fts) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 2,721.00 2 2.88 0.00 3 2.88 0.00 4 2.88 0.00 5 2.88 0.00 6 2.88 0.00 7 2.88 0.00 8 2.88 0.00 9 2.88 0.00 MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROJECT NAME : Surf Style Parking Garage-Treatment CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (fts) 00.00-0.00 2.200 0.000 0.00000 0.00 2.200 0.18387 0.15989 1.00 3.799 0.13591 0.00 0.06697 3.88 3.476 0.05397 0.00 0.04096 6.75 3.279 0.03489 0.00 0.02882 9.63 3.140 0.02549 0.00 0.02217 12.50 3.033 0.01997 0.00 0.01777 15.38 2.948 0.01620 0.00 0.01463 18.25 2.877 0.01346 0.00 0.01229 21.13 2.818 0.01139 0.00 0.01048 22.14 2.800 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 3.799 feet O 1.00 hours Recovery O 22.136 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 6.434 ft/day I Ml W PMM4NN Mwn YDOT- LKPNG MPMXoW (u VAILL ANMVVNl-3VlfWD ONDWVd T(A14 AM ! NOLLVILL'i CHAPTER 4 EKI MODRET HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD Project Name : 785-Surf Style (Pre) Rainfall Distribution : SWFWMD (24 hm) TYPE II FL Modified Contributing Basin Area 1.00 ac. SCS Curve Number 59.58 Time of Concentration 10.00 min. Rainfall Depth 9.00 in. Shape Factor 256 Percent DM 69.00 % = a s a a r s s .a ?? .. ,. OpMk: 4AN1 cis Tk" d puk: Win VkM1t V IL'41P Tk" MODRET HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD Protect Name : 785-Surf Style (Poet) Rainfall Diwr _ tiou : SYItFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified Contributing Basin Area 1.00 ac. SCS Curve Number 91.70 Time of Concentration 10.00 min. Rainfall Depth 9.00 in. Shape Factor 256 Percent DM 94.00 % MwAft MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PRO]ECT NAME : Surf Style Parking Garage-Attenuation HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Proud Volume between Bottom R DHWL Pond LerKp to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Is dun overflow ? Avg. Effective Storage Coefflolent of Soli for thl AM-Abed Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of SON for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coeffldent of Pond/Ediltration Trench Time Rownent During Storm Event Thee Increment After Storm Event Total Number of Increments After Storm Event Runoff Mynkgpuo Rk Nome 753-Poat.SCS Time of Peak Runoff: 12.06 hrs Rabe of Pealt Runoff: 4.74 ds 6e?ws- bar Conboi FOatsuve - Y/N Distance to Edge of Prone Elevation of Water bevel bunpa- dour Neiar - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 1,838.00 ft2 8,584.00 ft3 1.50 -22.50 It 2.20 ft 2.80 ft 2.50 ft y 0.05 18.50 ft/d 2.00 27.80 AM 0.20 1.00 2.00 hrs 12.00 hrs 6.00 TOP Sotbom Laft mom N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N Y Y 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 MODRET ELEVATION V5 OVERFLOW RELATIONWIP PRQ7ECT NAME : Surf Style Parkhtp Garage-At wimind n Structure Type: BROAD MESTED (rest Elevation 4.05 ft Crest Length 15.00 ft foeffident of DW:harge 3.31 Weir How EVonent 1.50 Number of Contractions 0.00 Design High Water Level Elevation 6.80 ft MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS I PR07ECT NAME : Surf Style Parking Gwne-A"ns" CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (Cls) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (Cls) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (R?) 00.00-0.03 2.200 0.000 0.00000 0.03 2200 0.05782 0.05764 2.04 2.920 0.05747 0.00 0.05730 4.05 3.141 0.06231 0.00 0.06733 6.06 3.422 0.07611 0.00 0.08489 8.07 3.791 0.08832 0.00 0.09175 10.06 4.055 0.09678 827.00 0.08181 12.09 4.109 0.07785 9 86.80 0.07390 14.10 4.112 0.06957 19".00 0.06525 16.11 4.062 0.06403 21161.00 0.06290 18.12 4.057 0.06172 22185.00 0.06063 20.13 4.055 0.09970 22 911.00 0.05878 22.14 4.053 0.05792 23,417.00_ 0.05706 24.15 4.053 0.05267 23 13.00 0.02651 36.15 3.519 0.02112 23 13.00 MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PMECT NAME : Surf Style Parkft Q waWAttenumWn CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (heat) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (Cb) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (Cfe) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (Rs) 0.01573 46.15 3.203 0.01302 23,813.W 0.01031 60.15 2.995 0.00474 23,813.W 0.00717 72.15 2.851 0.00619 23,813.W 0.00521 77.97 2.800 0.00457 M13.00 0.00393 96.15 2.667 23,813.W M admurn Water Ekvadon: 4.112 fed • 14.10 flours Neoor?erY 0 77.975 hours * Time kwrement when there is no runoff laKMn um IrMtration Race: 3.692 fVday t A ?? f Weir Calculations Rectangular Weir Wok COdit d (C) •® Find the Dischu0e (o) _ am Ck H@V t abort Weir (H) • , fed Weir Crest LwvM (L) _ 15M fast C dflcW t of discto 9 - C is camiiatsd from tabls 5.3 on papa 5.40 in the WO edMon of grater and Khg's Hand3ook of Hydmufts and k band on a 6' wain crest width 1 3JOI I* L41 YXH Q HwIm"Broad CnW Weir &#W" 0.62 ds cis O = C L Hm 4AM feet 0.05 feat 1 MOfeat t feet CHAPTER 5 Pi OPERATION and MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTION The owner will operate and maintain the stormwater management facilities as designed by the engineer. The owner will have the gassed areas mowed once a week, or as necessary. Any debris or trash accumulated in the stormwater vault and drainage structures will be collected and properly disposed of. All SWM structures will be routinely inspected for accumulation of trash and sediments and be cleaned as required. Any erosion caused by stormwater runoff will be restored to the original condition promptly. OWNER: I certify that L.O.M., Inc. is fully aware and intend to comply with the recommendations and schedules presented in the report. Avrahom Ovaknin, " er L.O.M., Inc. 4100 North 28th Terrace Hollywood, FL 33020 !/, /1.2..!) (0 - Date 10 PREPARED FOR FOAL nFVt`a1RTION OF PARCELS & 35' VACATION OF GULFVIEW REVD R-0-W: PARCEL 1: Lo\ 110. U M-MATE-s"INO. SLBMN5,M1, wcadrq re M. plat M«w/ a recad.d in Pbt Booty 11, 1— 12 - 13, Public Recam I P(rMlaa Canty, Florida PAACFl 2: Eat, 60, 61 and 62, and th. SwMMy ma-ha6 M Lal 107 and a1 of Lob Toe and 1oq, uoro-yMITE-APNNER SueMHeoN. ar,adng le Me Pbt Mawr m -I- n Pat Booty 13, PoW, 12 and 1A PIMde Recorm of P-1 County, claim. Toc HE - 7 --MC EMBED PARCELS: me EukrlY I/2 0l Coillie. Boulewd lyrq Rest of and ad' 1 to Nv dketaly ban- of Ld, 60, 6f PIM 62. nff 10ro-Y6ll TE-6%INfER $IeMM i50N. m f«ad.d n Sat coo 1J m Po9,v 12 db 13 01 1M Plpge Reeah of PFdim Cwnt} FlaNn more Partlydaly m rdb..: eegn ai 1M Nan. r or Lal eo; I-- 160.12 ree\ daq me yk,laly Io [urn la tM dghf 55 v bomday of aW lo11 l, e0 .. .1 1 oM 61 2 and abnp iM me o radio of 601).52 feat, aWtadad by a chord dktmee Wll b 506'35'OJ"R qn Ifly I l coma of add Lol 62: Mau H60'J 2 31. akn9 6w a ft 4-1-- b MI nd or add Let 62 v detmce of JS00 reel to point t a o r ! bineectbn RIM Me SeuMMY bou cm1MF< e I add CoiMe+ Bukvad v ]0 foot wlm rkft of al; Blcace 179.08 IM almg sad c and dmg a,: to Me Iell .nM by I a of 5962.52 feel ,ubtaMN by y I dlard d- If of 1)9.06 I wt Man. dO J to poet If inlasee'; .iM do YfeatMY eefaamn of lM NwMwly bemdory If al , I W let 80: Macy Y . of 35.00 Net to iM PoY1l of 30-11 215'd1"E o dbt N Labke 6,266.20 a4are reef (O.1H areal mwe a vu LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS W/O 35' VACATION OF C.",EW BLVD. R-6 W. PARCEL. 1: n raaded Lot 10LLOW-MAT-SON IER RESMN610N, 1-11-9 to the Pa `N-If f 11 Pbt Beek 13, Popes 12 and 13, P.Mk Rerade If Plmllu C-I, FlMda. PARCEL 2: Lat. 60, 61 and 2R ==y Me 6ouMMy one-f1oN of Lol 101 and a1 of L.N. im and 109, LLOYD-MIME-SIUNND2 506MN51M9, a[roWnq to Me plat therwl . recordw n PMt Boak 13, Pogo, 12 and IA P?EI< A-- of P-R- Canty, Flabv. FGAI nFnIO TION OF 35' VACATION OF GULFVIEW REVD. R-O-W: the Eutaly I/2 of OvIMw BWawd lyiyp Veal M and odpanl to iM RwMy bandai,e of Lots 80, 61 and 62 LRE LLOYD-MIITE-SNII6VER SL801Y151M4 oa rwded In Sat booh 13 a page 12 aM 1! el lM PIMIC Records of Obdke County, Florida more patlrWaly AR m Mb.> al fb. rang or ad Lad eo: ln 1 Mmdm 6012 fact amg Me weetedy y If MI vo id LIN Lott 66. 61 oM 62. . and - o cum to 1M .ilh a < of stmc. 160.11 Teel beaFq S rayuv of 601).52 ket. Mtad,d by v c11ad d fi6x -n;2 0375'OS'W to iM SauMee,t canna sob Lol U. 1Mnce N60J42 a"W akn ONE Seu Y I, vatauion a 3500 leet to a pelnE of Inlaaectlon Me thMY -1-1 o1 f ,dd Lel 62, v -- of 1 Nk <s11Mbe o1 told CuIINw Boukea4 a 10 foot wbe riff at wy, Mare I79.OB Y sang rid emlMine and dmg Me arc of o carom fo the lert wM o rod'ue of 5.182.52 I-l wbbMN by a shad distmn o1 Iri08 lael b,aFp HOD'35'0]"E to v paint of Atnvecfion riM tM Mwlwly .atawn of tM NwMnly ZZ, of aA Lol 60: !hate 36215'Ia'E a dkldty, of J5.00 neat to Ma PoMt of 0.4-R. [mtekf 6.266.20 ,glary reel (O.taa aan). mare a Ten. NOTE CMiSTRUCnOr1 SHAD RE IN ACCORDANCE MTN THE LATEST fMnoNS OFNfOLCapA CEPAPrVENT a 1NANVM+ciTnvWir ROAOWAy A - _ AN CtFAR NA2a '611NIICMN vps Teq acapAtR a cdla splwmtp ? o-«o-as-arn L.O.M., INC. 4100 NORTH 28TH TERRACE HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020 PROJECT LOCATION SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE 311 Gulfview Blvd. & 320 Coronado Drive Clearwater, FI 33767 PARCEL # 07-29-15-52380-000-0600 # 07-29-15-52380-000-1100 DVA2010-12001 FLD2010-12033 ISSUE DATE: 2/4/2011 PREPARED BY: Pickett engineering 113 SOUIN BRSI AVB2E.6ARIOW. R 2® PL10NE: Rk5136sa0F3 FAx: 16611 SSa1 W RoaoA C601RCATE a AldlNOa¢Ana9 RLCA1 dze2u - - - - ------ COVER SHEET --------------- C, GENERAL NOTES C2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3 SITE PLAN G GRADING d DRARIAGE RAN CS UTILITY RAN C6 GENERAL DETAILS C7-C6 UTILITY DETAILS 09 LANDSCAPE PLAN CIO LANDSCAPE DETAILS C11 PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP pEIERK CONStik1CTION NOTFS ??wiwcrata,wRF S?? nvwve[vaee:r ?,? mom wN rwr?nwv,?m?irw,c? a,? PAVPMa MlD GRAOMG NOTES ?,f???n,®. WATER SVSmANOTES NMTER SYSTEM TESTM AND lISPECI)ON REOIAREMEM NOTES SANRARY SEWERNOTES a..A,o,T?.r,Pe Nom` lEroTilC ANDUarrtFnO annws xExws ro somAaroecTVa SAFti IY NOIES -F- ; .o a i m a m a? PAVM { OPIDM TE"W AND N9PECTION IEOUINEMFMS mnpwOly, C09fKp1'IOF CI£ARN'ATERPI?V/ING OFPT. NOTES I. A1911C.WT NMLL COI(lY WIIN TNECMiPfNf TRAMlPORfATION tlPY:T iEE IXLL`HMC£ ANO f EE 9ClEdAF MD PND PRIOR TO A QRTMCATE OF RE4EW BA PR91EO1191IE fCR NRIMGPEgff AfNEYY. PLANS SHALL SUPERCEDE SPEC BOOKS IF A DISCREPANCY OCCURS CHECK PLANS AND CONTACT ENGINEER IN WRITING y2 Ch z a a F J) W O z a rz z C2 OF C11 YNY[ I[ (e /<r 1I ?o kl k t?A ?f T tE 1 Y1 y? d? F K P e ie t 1 f" # I ; )r O IR ?? ru ,? ?' `? PYOO?T? + k 0 A ? 'A!'"s'yr i 1 e ti ?'-- ?---- y . ? . < oER? na ' N nr 4 , ,;; EifRAPNiCSCALE aey...,. ?• ? .F 1 I- CON ACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSEBLE FOR ALL n ...... ? '?" ..v i E ENNRONMENTAL TESTING RE-REO PRIOR i0 DFMOIJllp1. Q m.n.cv m.Ww[ [YMr: i ' 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOTE ALL EATSTWG UNOERGRWND a Se /uwurv Yu ', yti ?,m. Jz, UT `RES PPo TO STARMIG SITE WORK. Z p 0 TY.vm?? ' 41 ': t< J. INSTALL %T FENCE PER MANUFACTURERS SPECFICABONS. AND SHALL HATE A BAIXPELED TRENCHED. THERE SHALL BE HD TRENCHING WTWN ORrP EINE OF TREE GHOPY. hL 5 d 4. CONTRALT TO INSTALL TREE BARRICADES PRIOR TO -- ,1 } M + ISSUANCE C O BI 1W PERMIT N CITY BTANOMOS, 3[f POST. W/ L AT TWD THIRDS OF EACH ME LYNP LmE AND/OR PARALLEL L TO i0 IIIE PROPOSED Cg151RUC1gN SITE. ..?.. .. T f k S THE Ott OF CLEARMATER, AT APPLICANYB EXPENSE, WL REMOYE/RE TE ANY/ALL "TER MTER J N. k y p RCLUDW RECLNMED WATER MMIS. .+ W ?-1 3 \ x X' ENNC / M R. ALL E Si ONFHEAD UWI ES WTWN THE ADJACENT R-O-W i YpE? F \\ _ s A } W ?? ° SHALL BE PLACED uHOERCROUND (ALONG CO AOOI %%/ ! %? } ? . F P >. ALL PRCPOBED CW-STE -E MICA- ANO CpIMUNICATION LNES )i !l l / f 'I aa[Tw.w suu BE xACm U.m GROUW. z N a[ »« NM a ? 40 Y g e d+aj ± ;1 E + e + ob- i ?- # Uml, " C I! . m i1. V 4J§ Amy k? w h m aa ? wa ? z a ?7z Lo 7 F V- 1 W F ? 0-4 q p? i N F a 90mv W 7'77 am. lmi- s e, 1 t t 1 / R I -- C3 of Cll „r6n?wM __ AlJO11E11311 31J ir'.H1tl3nY M1 iiVHS6 MnMAW1Ydn31LLO llV SL I 1 /1 j0 170 111"3 i1W16 SNNnd 3llptl 3'Jm11w3 B3nnr]NIpEM12-BJO Lfgll m3plYJ111flAwfNNNY3AMilTItISnMIWdmA3966 ?"K IpLL]3s N S3A"J tl[p01Ep tlDa 61N31L31Y%I3tl 309 3w1 NllM Aldlp] 1MR AYM-a VlllMtl WXM3N3YD 6 3X1M%1M13dYJ NJOUlf10311 Y tunnels a-oinnln3nrp o136TTw1s 3orrnls Ton!%9 wemlicaNNm1n33ii3nrdrn a lw3t"as3saY 31YYpllp Ol IELYZHEr[uiv WYB4H 6WA L'IYIwO?T11m1SBI1S 3SQY1[ ? 333 3111-L6R33d tl1ALIB f03JMw901 EpRW 1?30nd .r SMLL w031BLAVd OA'3M S133a 1?Y'dw1NYS30(N/ 1m?Il3N 31LL'1Z .6? ?? Srpy(g 3f13pnpy3lr33111 ND(f3pV11V 3SlM6SNLU1l tgR131k3 LL 5!y ? o[6r z95'+ZL :x tl. 316n wreY,%kN 3LSYMUlp6 tl3lYMW3p a?A1JlY13rJ ?p 1 Nd? 38 TT15631Y(IIXM 3NL Stlfpwdlq]W wbYell Q 31tl3nn3fipl 310N JNIJYIS tl31sd1!"IO L%YTptl 64 E ?tl311J6'-Sm111KK1o?'Jw16rc3tp1YW01!INN.SOrol on )rn•M30s 1 : E6t ul Lit I n Mrl: ILL tK 6SZ :ILL ILl ZZ E9 %ooL ZE NOS E9 ? %oDi R %OS 9 - Vo m E ?! 650'6 %w?f•WY ` SEl %AOt m %oS SFT 1400[ 99 1E05 Il lll l t itoDD•T/1a?SI S[ 414.: %oL [ZL %IMI[ W[ fio6-58 %oL 9 %S - )+ooo't/*+ Et-!^•I TWOF MW _ %I !WL TSS %ODS '9FT %O6 9DT %L I s %S -: Ko00'TN?ES N Lwzry IN+WM ? tYYI-WYI iwz: /v IwM ', AA -LYYf 3r/?ww WM , LMWM wvrtr : lhl?n, ain lYAl LMN•M : IMY •r11 wv166nw fNN45 .+Inwns+ans•ww yAls-3MF 6ooTi w3Amt?ltutdnmlDOWaZOlf 36 " ?iupn' 3orLralw3l saon?r6lawn s-a 36 Tms up131 map IV:Ylld.3LL AB391 W t 3?Vd6IX6M W d 3965391 mA Y 36 TMi6 3iflLL 39I mA ?? 'wrp luw.a3ova31ona3w41313e lsrw snrM3w1oo3srwlrn e! - _ -. t ,. 3emo3tnpm ?axw zl ? p ,? s r! i? Sa?' Na3763i6 ep a3n3ow93s4YU3uoep'o3K33nos o31Nra 36Twn ? •, ? .. ___ s3nnlxi3 ills-??uooa s3zos.wwn slna.?aoa'smur?-u !`gi3_` -s, t3 L l rnzo-lL4-<mn -xz io-'-TS SSaaora33.zz-3lonmils s?rM3as + ?, 7 .,, -...- ?ls. E , ? ? ? .up 3u wr?r??mxtr?4NYiea?tr?s3e3W1mispstrnM3?asrxwnis?aY1 "'?'" r ,•, j?a t ?._ ? SZ ? ? v n3l6aMp 31?`%O A6 n3MOtld 3B TAM 315YM W10S SI ? v - ? ? .. 1 ,? j j _ ? Y Mro-n91LYns1w3r3noe?w tl311ornam ? q _ ¢t 1 \ 0 c tlNdr.)WiminDf 639p3tl 30 TAM 1ntl3d351M4tltl l13mlldWn(Y rxo 3ML fnw.]ac .wu U30(IDS 36 TTM6A lo-lNtro Nr114MSr3ma36an1spa3nrdwn ln'n A E ?:A 3161p 6tl3m 3fpMlAllYln3YNfItlIN130N 3tlV 3tl3H1T1 ? n?s w?xrcl Wlr. 1 ?,e¢? Nfaul, MZi 4s u? y r ??• &fr ? a3soaau 311 w33ormp3wz aooi3rN lxs?T3doMr? \? !? ;.. .' ? i ! o?L,Y.?lar? r a\ ` .V ., \\? y j ?xt? x jq +? d1n1 a?L3LL31lwplpN0?MY33 JN10113dtl 10 T'Mlllddv 6D0L HlEt ANr' 7 y l,?.nr 1 $\\ F t v E ? O3l'A A31N515WJNI60M'[nED663N1?3a33'A?n3W3lHw3'?YNLw "?? {,yam ?.?. ?_ ^? 55 > A?K3SlH13'Mtl303a 3H1AS 03511d1d'?JZS PJEO T3rvd AlwfYWCO ':? 113w __ ? S• ^A # 'dVn 3LYtl 3?nrN1S nOOU 311 NO WApS S'1 1 s.r. q 4 4.p " 'a aA 9n=T3.3n.3rpz ooov Nluvn3 Lsell3drYAL4f3dD!ld sau-n ...? 1 i ?iv'.s ? _ _"`? - - ? `. ` ` ..•_? yy ? M I6TML$?H6163A'd6 rr[ S3aLd69B :1Y101 voot n ?? 631Vd600E s3nrds 00[ SIYMM/d d aM ,... ! •^?• db4rM? J y._ • tr ? - §.^ h ,'. s3nVd6lZ S3'JYd6E9= ~?°^ 1 °'? `R F ? ? li6UW l53T'd6 LNa68t661 LMIL ILM14n163tl t (dtll ?1 ..:. Ct4 itlT ^?. _ ` - ?r{' ?.,_ 53'JYdsS tit= _.' li6Om t53l'/d6 rKfstlY? WOVlri31 9?:, - Hen S`v1 _. ?- f Loc x?t U. ISIn16 "?N8163wdS YIE 63YId6 oT, iIl(LL 1 i r ?• t/d 1 63Jtlds¢ tlw ?IInWMd 33AOldfB w ?1P, mcu ( { s.re j ? ? t ti ??.. 1 r? ?? S3JYds W6 637Id66R niNra O[IQN l.r'"; >Er?m r:Ym ia111 .?13wu ? .., .,M. L \ . n N?? ? s3>YdSK l??'153JYffi 51R661a?61 11pIW 1NMfN163a . k ? j ? !I O - ' L 1 ?F, [Z'I' C? 93JYtl60 S3J1'd6 K1= ? ?i r - LYiCT 1 !\• j ??G7 ? 1a66p6'lIS3Jrd65Y.L6l4YfE1 '(NJ6111V13tl : f ?.} j? 1 •` •• 1 - ot, H%U< tsrNSlarwnlwe?etwsrof.w?w W Ntas1Y1WiesY p; #o4 p i o'?i s i mo... -p I+ourrp-naornand-It i Li L <x? ?6..r3.m ? ?.`1 ? 1 e,....! ? •- 1y ??? ? ptvM3os1 L3 sas trs3s3oonolszt336lomfuex31 n6ar1e of T ? a ? p?a"",o,?$` , t .,.. w?..cm..m! / '?`'? r Ot17 Iir13iY3.w,va{ o r?1.R Y11gtlIlS3M , .. Nt 4 H A L • Av. ZI r 'z (S%glYNl 6r! 76xs Y1L1ow01sr3 r NOLLi+YMiw.? z W p< 41 lorlpwlel uLro .. • y S s t` T .*?i" t7 tor6omx71e??uu'4 lYwix t3nWwrlas -? - a E17 :,.. ? ? rayaalsww ? ?• ? - ?C? r V I??r1nMw'?"'{ie i u'o Nwa L3oc1111epx . ? aw6aN ' ,. / `n.,,° 0, ?3J8 Y a3sodom ? --9a913s -6 ? , .a< ?r 1 ? '-- .-..-, •": ? ('p(h?wH'7iiiYZ :mwx,s36 ?? y '"aaa." t ! ., z ? • .3 ?i? ?"? k''r??. ? V V° '1fIM1t plw r3l11'n00Htl3BD WEB ? "^? t ? (= TI t6M Vim 3sf1mYpYi3Atlgtl3lN373n310YptlJ *`d r.e?.,? 1 xY>3w C iwMtwiurt W811'Alrt l7IN'1•At1Cl 3?IdgN3dDMO1 _ „. ". ( _ 11 awt/sitalslr Yr1Yr'36EIIY YYnr'AMYt :Y3LI S1pNY3dN TVlol ,. ?:• :, I ? _ ry 1)?///?y ttl E?aYY3t3Al1oaLlM{dsr ('rw wd x3q a3LxN+ 1 r // k: ,.I! 'nwlt '3t n3%r44 •nune • Y?moNa,ne z iwasEtart aait'nem brnEl'n%[e: V3m3TmdOT3n3n .MO., ?'.`.3"?'; 1 I .. / f Sy 'a3Eodoad sNisa3 :31m1 Y1Y03n6"r"i _ 9 aNMWYWS?3x)T%?"a« ? •C1t f f.. bYM'd is cYS'cr r3n3ardoT3n3oTrlol iO1 1Oi `. .,"' ?.r? p7 ?? ,., ?; (a"n N'as6lY9 r3mwurornMo-n sE ,:1ou6.wu smi.'. _..... t }.. i f - -_ U'sr'tl'i6 HYIE Mien SUS SMIBIb 1?- p 3 la ltlaoml-L ,?.. t..< "' X r - 1 r. ?,?F A to t., D mYtl41Y133tl 11Y131'3DVYVOSNl41Vd - 3dOT313f1'9 ..{ ». -i y+x ? I § -AN M INVtlln183tl 41Y13tl 3611m363ntl ._ _ _ . wua. wa r r .. R• ; • ! ,-]I / ' / ip•1 S31fY?V311. ql i ?1 i5 97VOS OIWVUJ s 1 l /?' , A. OOllaoo-wasst?z [0 "?:=1:? bt § ! ! r 3-, :i?lEt, a f/'s /91ELYOfplitl iO139Md •9? .. .._.-.... ?- ..?. `h6t' ,. 7 3NAOUYdLwrOtll? xif I I an• v..i. ?4 ...?.,? _ rr k Isd t ?/ •? `c scauav ramur •• a.? ?.. ...•? ?? - / ?? ??'? / p ? Tanta M3n3rp wrlos Kli S t f osevs?e«1m _ .•d raw +%nm rpiol4n f ?, / 's u6rc Yanoa'mrlsap \'.... i xl ? ++-r ,w. ? 'x.,, ? ?? ot;rYn3tpes3msls3no[nt ? ? 4 ,. ? -` S ?N SNA3nN6(INVi L6YO?nfIS 31rw tlDA3NIf5( •. ',f "^<.. ,$ 4M9 A ? ? v,?? u -- ?- •- ---«.. ,e ?-? S. ml'wl a?iuso$iol Na iK6LR(LIN _ Mv600N'nillpl - + !ww ! 4 ? _• ]N 1p1171tl1.wDJ ?MIl]3l?pm-[ ?\, _ 1n3W3nw 17M1dSY 036QgUd ? S +? -T - =? ?. .e 9wcu5ll.6il _ (p ICRL TI'MO1M9 u °? " p CiLxOS Od XTLM3ds4 .• f.?. '.., ? r_ .w `. 1 -: '- f ? ?gQ (? ? JN'FIN1L336SI13113pN :L?3NOm31Y?60A'N1336Sl6'Z 1N3Y3AYd 3L3tl'JIY)'J a35odoad '- ". 6# ? 3ovN1°iiisiu?wLn°0°M'gl EOlr 3N7A1KddneM - - - - - _... j- ( 1 ? ? 'a6 11ri7 awwln3NMO'1 "p s3weE31s lr1E)FFJ { i aN3031 € onto a/. -ji 1 'h !; t i- i r! ? fr i GRAPHICCSCALE SCALE , LEGEND ?? F. vnaPERTVI? 3 , . . PRNECT u.RS 112e AC/ 8 r PROP09ED COt/CRETE PAYEAEM j 'i ???1 .•^•• • •. 6SIOEWMK Wei 1. nax .'.. PROPOSED STORM PIPE lly a ?.. ... - - . PROPOSED WATER SEANCE G •. ! / - --- PROPOSEDFWESERNCE i - I. i _ _. PRa+osED SAMTARr SEWER il.. l Y ~ I, j b, fi t i ? 4' , ` {} I . ' 1 .R- I ? rRMwl?a I-_-__ __- ---- -- - --A Ys =` I .I z m iEs I weuA/s+axc a, ?w 1 1 „ ? 1 I 1 i I ? i ri!N 1 y Is i y 8 k ' ?.s rv ..ro e°o-? n it aw, nnx ,r °xc mxa awx xM m aan m.R -I- I .o a 2),.m, 11 all c VmI§j • 0) CL 3a3 ?E S? 5 W q w z C7 ?Wo- a 6 7m W C7 co z mQ°a z oI a n c)w ? E., d1 rRa?? ? roc a ?n sic rnwan[w.?rowa¢xorE? N? q ova v?.v??Ax?cx onrRre pn rr'it v"uuar?x?WtxE - ? ?m?CJ W oPA?i roaEHWAIE Mm m T«? o ke ? ?u ?? ? xsc - H- PvN - 5 F sam mNx ? Pox?SECTpx $70RM SEWER MANHOLE ? ??K ?j°rnx? F r Tn .. RING??CO R D AIL ++d? a ?? C5 of C11 ?Amnortrnax _ • /,y Y? s cwo? iA ??>sLeyB?M ? ` // /J/ .?? ? 4?b'a. 1 ? sNFtT PBaa® ? / 1)+Y+wrxq uxvc / l F+ / ) y r ? t ,? t Lf AU t' / N ' x i } / N a 1+ I ?{ y ------- ----- F ¢, «zaw:,n -- - t { fit: ?:v° )) I SCALE I' GRAP1ilC SCALE E LEGEND ` 66 ? C m :.. A' '+ 4 <4 ? 1 ? PROP09®C(XICRETE PAVEI.ENT ? g ' _ ??_ ? ° PROPOSERS OPoN PE - PROPOSED WATER SERVICE , ? r F t r PROPOSED SANRARY SEMA32 d -.• .. ,:.. I ..., 4rlm NOTES ?'? t -__ ?? t. COIRMCIORTO WRY TIE LOGI%N10F AU EMBTNGUDERGRDIM Ilf!(IESPWptTO WBINUCTIOILUME31Nf£SFFNOBTAYEDiR DY '. r ' m?fA nC Aw°srnw n!NZ rwt taAiAr oean'l !? ? ••• ()B•Y % ? B¢K t /?R}EErrau[ mY el OrMFRY 2 W I , LA. us . rtAAA) AXE c# sus[) p., T_ j = - • E / f !05 I- z t Y-- _?-__-- .. YMN te HW ItAA; AAFI. I P ru rHSt > s n aLer t m ' { ?1 i - ' .: s. ,?F aXPm ?e aN Aa, • SOES r xi a ^ iAQ• I _... Y , a W l ° C t IP M o ..:.: .La.NKA H mY N re aaa • oFVan cm i 1a 0 t t : x z `? a w wo a t' OrY "'°0°- 71 , I z ?a ,... r ti _ -RfL e X s _ (L , o? rY t- z t ?,o3 L.area ` - 1 F ''` a i Co9? Y ...... . ! r ? 77 •-cj rl F uciw unau w% PauNA w ........- II ? I -. PROPOSED FNtE SERV0.:E ? --- ---------- g r t 1 ` f A ! t ! r 1 i I f I t 1 t II t ' ,yam i 1 r 1 - aa c -TI a 12 ? 4 c ' , T 13. --Y. - 77 - M - W a q o - a? .•.t• TN,..?a eXeN.. , (),t ?P,ER e, TN+BC . () L m ALSO NE9PoNSISLE FOR KLASSOLYATEDEE£S AID ALLVTIER f6TNL FEES. 16 pA:Ttt£R DN PIPE SHALL BE l6TALLEO BEIWFFNANY TAPAID WATER = °- n E (rt sM56 Br?ni 4YYA'B [AOEN? .. ?. (?4.4W ) HAlHy •i?S ) d . =Lf-CT0.EINOT PIPESHALLBEM3lALLEDSETW£ERANYTMAID SACXFL(vWPRE'hNTIXlICE. AL LFASTONE XYYf aF DUCttEHiOH PWE 9MALNE MSTALLED CN THE SERWC£9DE OFANY BAgtFLOW PNEVENTOR _ ...+ G[ ? - - 0 2 ) Y t ?" f j ` )T. iHDST NLOCx35HLLL NOTR USED ON ANYPpiTDN OFgtt WATER MANE. tXYMEgWIMN.RESTPAWTS PER gTYOF CIEARWATER NDE%/DJ. ' le. s-sAAarARruTERAls SHALL w,vEAYIr«AI SLaPEaF,.aos '" ?.. i t Y (?L`E 4 `f F.D.C NOTE t . PIEA2 ST£ PXIF PRDRCM PIANS PDR -ATIWDf9GN ANO PIP1 YARRUL lDR W 6 f 4H5 A E F. CRAPH X P MPD56 CKv C6 of C11 a R,• A. 24- 'Su- W>w• ra m nay .M> °> rwa..A ow>?+m• STRAIGHT CURB RJ1sw?WwnwT aW tlw RkM,a>a?I Na W eNdl M ". W.e •>N..w ano.. a. yma. eac. •i P.b TYPE I NRB f?? TYPICAL DRIKWAY CROSS SECII(X! FL R i?a B w,,,.,,, -, B RAN NEW I > /•• ?--+ ??.•. •., SECAON 8 B w ?.i. w° Awa w '?• ..... .....` Aww .w ow ,..•s»...r. war a g c he ?E s ? ? ? ? • W C ? • "°°"' °""° a )? •;?.• •••.. /,-"'" w CONFLCT ETAL WASTEWATER AND STOPoAWATER PPE `a. 5 > TYPICAL CURB SCCnoN A-A Gtr ;??•7 ,•`,r ? "mo SCALE: N.T.B. g n.. CROSS SECTIONS °v0 TYPICAL SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION & RAMP DETAIL € J' TNAN$MA AT MWS orv , a > mr , k No Es: ' w >.a pnr ea.«R r. m.• ea a . rM ? s.c Jf10N wl..xn I I IN' i? w wr ¢.Aw b W>a'rq w.sa o-J ~ u ? 4 to 'r < -Crvnpoc>b ca,PSM SoPaa. / / ? K. amc aaara q \Tg ,: jil [, TYPE E _ auR au AN vEW -• ->Yr• p A .Z O MODINED CIARB 1. Z-1-11T eacN VALLEY CUTTER CURB 5 r r•RYInbr?N? 1-3/4-R Gn4 \? NWaM a m.J, ,q 1/fR t.' r . \ 4 1 Y LA'a x C ?6sG[ .°'N. > ` -. ,f TYPICAL CURB ?o•,a,r - 8°° r° atli CROSS SECTIONS ' MEDIAN CURB ?s 1 v r:rp ?w ??? RETLRNL C ERR RAMPS Icrv_FTiNC VFW ,r M'o,.{'!'R' a?ro °^?aw? ? }" F -?1 --- :: SECTION 9-e TlTVanta.l A A u°1'•°>:.w..:"'°w°o`.?.WO>llMw TYPICAI SIDEWALK CURB CUT RAMPS t?^_??`,•? '" >` :; ;`,';w ?, .oer .r >er - >->K aM,o ns - a ? _ CROSSLETS(MPd?fieECTONd) NA ? TO VAULT ?? FOOT TYPE EIN LL CONTRA ,RTO EcT ?NERS •. L Rox FDDT TYPE F (MODIFIED) Cp(IROL STRUCTURE k1 w/ eFnurrs a C7 . yPG7? 50] mo-, ? s_?z? O F W fa an Cmo.aM ? PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED eFreec cLSS SICxwER DE ruL a d w _ r F7 F Pn >s> .,. ao3 ? z PW / DOWELLED CURB R.TS [,.7 Q Ly s> a w VZKSD • 2' DEEP 45 DEGREE STORM K BLADE EXTRUDED ALUMINUM LOUVERED EQUIPMENT SCREEN N1 ' t e• . a. - g1iL5-.17.' ?' kISQ?vti)® i • r Inc m a asR •A. Na Rw r.As.man - r ? E ?3;?-.x_ ? ` ? owR.>s 1 r'-rrc wN ? I r ses:sa^ `? wy.a e. ' R.. >a• d A ? • ?sr ASPHALT STREET AND DRIVEWAY REPIACEMENT REWIRED FOR CONCRETE REPLACEMENT REWRED UTILITY CCN MCIION FOR VTRJtt CONSTRUCTION • aNNRm s L ?>* •a tim -F I A X. o W E cTRFFT AND DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT FOR T EA ` rwww aw,.a .a XMOY'° sccT aN .>cR L 'I e ?- z w> - H -o z v? 4 [`n?IrocTF a. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFACES on i s r WHEEL STOPSrzREINFORCED CONCRETE w..a c ? T N ( •? ) z, r.. ?' s row I SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION ??-r-?- ffi? EWALK CONSTRUCTION DETAIL DROP-OFF LANE PAVEMENT ARCMITCCTURAL _ Yw•O•Y•V•C•R•¦ sazrwP. C7 NTS CONCRETE SID SECTION DETAIL hrs OF C11 tart 1e,A. Q AR.R,? p{ wlmm-. on c? I ? ? w 'C TrA??YfY f EK"M>LE w' munK nwLErm e. a. SHALL BE (b/2e 15) / G11 1V %1pN PAW II1P M 15 MI1 5 ?RaO1flALL OR xNICHE R R C I?ER MJI ORH/T- OIWEfER MEASIIREMEMI TO K MADE a-./] OBOY£ EY.i51 C.RADC C IXSf. tYMts?? TR[fKAK1LG ZONE MO ,, MO tONE iRFNCHIRG 10ME 10]Fl.X_- FHOFiE V@v AWO BOR pRE Y /01MPIINE_VNiES ,fHnln PALM/lRE£ F i ALL Pb55Bl£ -tea ,RE?H,M4 t4RE VMLM/IRFE AT LFASf M• OEE Rµ Vw BORM FOR UUJMS TYPICAL SINGLE HANDICAPPED STALL 4- 1 memo 3 C UVI • C RK d w ES a r [7 mow" co ? qQM F mom w a Q a ?a¢ w :Jul w ? c7o a ch t? C8 OF C11 TYPICAL DOUBLE HANDICAPPED STALL ti .n M a 1 rl ?•w,iv mree .n.nfw v ..n °s,a w o-r?v M`...... ?r?vv..a M m..r.se. u. trn.j •..aw,,,,_ al.vos> fw..+A o..r.M M. C if e. } 2 F ? u.. o.. j +?i... ?raL3 Brew. wfwn _ x or.w? u . n .w.°"""' ...r. ? w. ...?.... °? .a a.v. : kSE°.:." } f? ? .) aaa?w.om'-F0 ?` my ? SS IDENTIFICATION DISK R ' G e • 01g C R -..?. SETTING _ _ A 3 B PLAN -Al HYDRANT ETTING E ?...+.... n.) TYPICAL IR RA NT BERING 5 b ?.rs ?,une TYPICAL VALVE & °a WATER VALVE BOX CONCRETE PAD PLAN VIEW n' ? mr? ? s.... n..... .a... 6 i i - !r,? 77,7 ,... lr*1 y nms Uw.) . In,M•w.0 / n.w. ?• L? !i 19 /e a._ a o ...anf v+> w./ uin.wwn x?.s....ssw.a..e. o.? waw. ?..e_m H e 3? <.....w ? ?_? _ i ?wi-+? ? •`"?`.o w : x ?v a o ? ? ? ? Fo ?..> n.) srr a.w.. are. PVC PIPE THRUST RESTRAINING TYPICAL METER SETS W/ RACKELOW PREVENTERS 1-1 /2' k 2" MODELS . TYPICAL COMPOUND ATER METER SET BO' RISE 3 " ' MODELS TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT SETTING w v. ? "H am 6 W ^ o a0 C'' 0. wo `' a 1.4 E+ F F ooa ? 5°m1wW ? 6 w.u .a YwM .W r? t a....a.a ?:A CHLORINATION TAP TEMPORARY BLOWOFF -} ANO SAM. F TAp CLEAN OUT DETAIL xxs. ^^ ?? T ° C`!9 (%aPEC1.0. en e u • iLL0 Cae .w[ wvrl Iy u_ rv e LLS f.M> ,uJ v fw.l E tl E lC W >- N - 02 N ? ff S S C9 of C11 ?TK ?a+s:aus ? _ A 19 1 J r J r' r r JJ ..ms...w .. ? .J __ rj, r 4 i !j 7 t? -, I /1 ? r r I x , \ r e r ! w o ??°? J °13 , x u3 a,? ua eY _"?- ?tSE ?a as r „8 r r r x r ri ? ! r ?r ? ,? f .xJ i r + 41 - y? r Ij Y ?. 8'I', ? ?Jkl'? d 8 t _ _ e ?? ?It Y ` 1 kE ? 8F `d M,_r s - C R{7PVr4t>o 1,4'r E sC(t - °__ p? k - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a "SFr. sa d ? } e •? . ? ;- - ; ura?? f ?.e F' ?? x P ' arsmas_ :: E ? k ii m fFFFRF? §?'tl gGgs €??? ? W RRRR RR@ HIP a a ,h. r ? SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE s . r -- 11 GULFVIEW BLVD. & 28TH TF nrH iFnxace : '{ N Pickett 0 T C s 320 CORONADO DRIVE . . ? ? ? o CLEARWATER FL 33767 ' ' ' ' eng(neerfng rtmi»auw rowa N s LANDSCAPE PLAN n . IRRIGATION NOTES 1. A low rdums Nr4atba sy M. that aoMd.n 100% covsog. to d prop-d pm anga, vM be d.M9ned aM MMO*d by the cantracta. z. TM prapo.ed krigrtian Spun mart mart s sKCe.d dl gplkaMa aty cod. s. tm .hw? •tn? -t w ?Hae -dotW-din n• F iol th. Comm.nc.m.nt dr 1..r 4. Ydgatbn At- mart b. W p.ct.d and aaetrot.d by City Proj.at Manager prior I. Inrtawi- al mUkh. 5, brlq.U. a.-butt d-h". rhkh aceufat.ly and d.arty W-tity dl modW-tkn. k/s a.ba0tuti-, moat b. A Mttad prlar to fNd ll W-tlon ord -.pt-. 6. TM aKbtbg 5/a" rats mats rW bs utE4ed ler MN brpot- Sy.Mn. 1. Th. taldamap. CWW4ocls mart w.rdnale M. tit 'sit and pars r my k+r a1. Mgotbn -Vol tlms wah th. City and th. C.nsd Contracts. a. The Tdlortng Frlgation syrt.m cv1pa1 is will be uU11M. ps .ach marutaat-. apsdilecAl- Toro-rl.tdflm TachLb» So" CJ..nbq. Pr.srs.-Comp.nrdbg E.M. L.N1. HARM - Rdndld a Stetlon Outdos Cahbd 71- Rich . - 214APR 1' Dachk Vdw Amtsc - 10' Round Vol. 9- GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES rrwr. rw•r w war r-++..r • 1..r.a r ..+r ..... r+.w.r rr+ • ??ti rr .+.r.arp...•N.1. rrrl.rr-•lryr «ru..s? ».r?.sr?iw m?i.rw?• rrw.rrrvr..r rrrrs ray rw r .w....•.• rw r nrr r•..f-'. r r-I....r w•r r Mr-t .Fai3rW Q?.r~i .i ...r : •.?Mir..r r..iMr .w..r?r rr:M'•w ?Mw..aawr wrn.wr.sw.r u nwry r.-+?r rwr . Y ir. r rrw r•w. rr wr..rr r r r .r.wr wr %r1w? ...Y.YwMrrrrwi.?..r wnr.WN-r..rMw. w•nwrr r r r-a r. w M• rr rr..r a .rw rr .Mi., -. r.+.. T.•?a?? -z wv. it .+r. •.+.rlw. wr r IN?rM.?..lr••Yrr'r .?M .r I..ar. rr r Ww.rr r « W r}I .w.w n Wes. t?f r ?.r-.r r. •wr. rdr ru r r r r w ?r or-.a.. r mgr . r .rr r .+r- rr r ?.r r r air w.p r..a. .aarr.s.rrW .aw.r.e.l .rrrrr. .?yr•r.r.r ? r.•a..rm.rrwerrlrrr. c-.-+.rrrwrrr r?.urw c.?mNr4.aarr rurwrw r ?..sr?+? wrw r.+ w. r.r. r ir. p.a Harr -rear ?arh .r+?wreb rM r..^ar.rrr y rV•. r .:sW?. r.rr +..a• 4' CLEAN COQUINA ROCK ri"'-'r.....r.wrarrwi.r++r. «.rrrrrar Hare r.... r? ?aM-mr. rrr. wr...rrw? r r ..tw w•.+1 r «1ar r.A.t ;a ?..«w ?rr..r ?.«. wl ra.rvr.wrww lm ?.?.? WEED BARRIER w r?d.1°' +.rrr?r?. e.+? wr r rr•. r.r ar.. V?V A?V? ? 1a e-..ww.»w?. "r r.r.r rr..ww r r .-..r. .r?.wri r p""y w?.i.? ?°.?'?'".""rw.r?-".tr r r?i.r.a.'•"`r.+r. w NATIVE SOIL r+..-......rrn.n.wr.wa...... r....r.rsrrrw.« ., iii- i ,.era _ r r.K w.r1 r r .yr 1.rr. ww a«vritl°i. rr.w.ar rr.-1.•.a .rrr .r-drw-arrr. CLEAN COWINA ROCK 5 a.-'r.r r•a r rYrl...r YY r.I.L Im LL t. irons. a rt .rw maw m?Wrr ne raw. O?/ ` ::»w? er?M Wraa. rw ea. a aca.WruW f®a.lrN enrla Raim¢ m ?E o C xcwxr u ! rla rns.r- •? ? s iii 41 4 lwr a.a ? I ; ? n°.3r ? t IM =-- r'r w1 wm .. u. aaa - 9; m ' t-zftwwr ste fW1! frc ---.I<_ _ a_ f np iK...m. TREE PUNTING DETAIL Hats a a ?l 2 z norM?al?Npmr ei?ia. r?cnriv n.rsr W b a w?r??c rounnmcn r.a ?? _ C ?L1tp b tr) z . ?.aom1 anus a wruw O? a t a W ? n»n. ?mY roa.<mws ',Z,y m0? C1 T3 Y rKLN, BEW ro ?C ? 1XM .? _ doosw caw W 66. w?Z caz7 6 14o m W. in Al .1 ?:>ucd X can a All = V) cor.erm sea ro ra?awr arzro V) op Q n xao; w awiw'^""" RR__%I lFC rm,ra rWa,.nc [y -cco aaro PALM ME FLARTHO AND STAKM MAIL trm rt rr ?Npar..r Nlcrrzp. u) z5C'T er? V a ..o, a raw ant. ti s r r.a ?.. r?-rrr.a ?sWarw urmurn ar t 1/.• 51l11R ? gMWr1DC0\FJtUt PLANIMO OETNL I IxT..rl e.rnr if .oor ran T arwzAao..Wmrm Yc nulr u5r ra 1nG) 9..aa PUNT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) 11.1.8 C11 OF C11 r 8813 1 3 tie NORTH - _ ------ SCALE. ?•_ ?5 - i > % d > ----------------- =? - ?Y$ .........._.® iz??rrsc.:y. .. - .'ti.,s __ _ ?_?k)sww.+o - 'to r.to ,,, .ax a"?.t .ot tea" H Eli crbNO?6.o lip, l - i- o? onog Q, of c?•'.°.? n1s? 6 i PROPERTY LINE I _ -°----- BUILDING LIMITS I ?_ _ i ! I I- S PROPOSED PAV4MENT i r M1 r• - ._ - -" i - _-_ T d Ida I ?? I - /C8f PROPOSED f If©'MCRETE 8'roa gl ? ? ?? 1 mr 1 4 l r- _ I j j fl f ?' ocg w Y S=i q; ate,: " II" o o kph z J L5 C .` I yg5 ? r I ? 1 1 ? ? T`? ? G°'yc...Lc ?, I -.,ie-'z •.R I , z 1 Y I. R - AN Y -"_??d CRS ry / ? =Fib -? - -------------- I( R a ° U .. ?. g z S1L I' 4 i . tl- r - 1 _I 0 y ` - SURF STYLE PARKING GARAGE o + ; *+ __ 0? __ gj ' ° CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ? 2 eej ?I "i ??? ? ' -- _ mI pa': ?' REDUCED Vw?$ SITE PLAN 9 PICKETT ENGINEERING, INC. JOB #785 j 1 • f r; / X? 1 r, ? ?4gd.' 1 I r( I' ?_ ? r wv:rr? ( fJ ?` r-?`. ? Y II / ? , / _ CONCRET' 1 I J, 4 I E 1 I I 6 I f ! I 1 ? f +I I 19 I ? i ? 1? t I ? f LOT 8? )•_?? II(I ; ? Fbor t7? • ? ? F J 111 _ ?,e sRart u?4r ? i f ? 25 3?c +? J 1 ?fbd kLroFan . )A6' ? ? ? fl Fber ?wlm . SW tit? ,t \ f? 1 M • f w. kxn (-492' ? ? ? ?= m _ ? I ?( / ?' t WMC?t tyM-c ?-0.141 ? +j ? M?9 > ? :. J5 r " ? no.r wmson - 351 ? ;I (/ tea' t1 ?:?w,o r?:JZe j M.. 7 CLEAN COOUINA ROCK , BETWEEN BU4DING do NORTH PROPERTY LINE - 10 Cv) ! I ATP *?_ " - { x ? 1 •`°"_,m,? Gum k CY 40 ous 17.52 DELIA ANGLE U4"425? i eaC LEWTH - 18012 CHWD £wrH c a o ruau_e -' 5C875'W_'M' 78(1 IT, 1 N 3 1 h 02 ? 42A2 Of'AY61 t 7904 i 779.(34' 1 x0745T036 . ?? . ? ? ' G- mau ., f wgy? raooioe.Etaaa AQU (Jxy AOJALEA A sraLtlKPtJ Ca,h?mm+rs,7 Ir O f r?mem+c.Fa,a ? Em f 1 ,? i F 59 _. - --" CLEAN CWUINA.ROflf_ B?ThEEN C10 BUILDING NORTH PRY?ERTY D C O Z G ? E •-a LINE 1 y f 'ZI 14- ? I w r °{? etc - v C=4sm IB.?CU ?4 W?a+eMr ei W_ +b, ? ] - v - "-`_ ? . 1 1 ? t` 7 ? .. ? ++?. ` y o. rJ.J.uoEG / } ti NO 20 WB ma J '/1? t.TSS. Q10'[_ WL4CFhT 3 brow; r-, :. 1 fl 1 1 I 1 . cfA' !}.;c ? LOT 60 cna,. ? N 1 4 n (, PR .y 1 1 Yf I f +.o MASONRY rl "L'VE NC ftESTAU!tSTAURAM / fa0 7 f ' x '(. azx. O_E I A R9CK ZONE A }D 1 C?0 f !?' `T } ID FDC Cb1M A1 OU E? ON -.___. ca.,, er.c• 07 t/ ?? 1 1 __ _ ? ' ? 4-4 HO W f ' z r' /fj4 f ro : r ?gng 3 T61 sTS T aY--_. -7 3 _ g wT tOB D L- I -d . a Ib a ?? tl vo?>g ;LOT 67 1` , BUILDING FF.W.qr?,,. H _ _ _ 1 1 1 i 1 1 ( f " 1 t ' ! t'JU +T ft W lI_Diti . 1 { 1 f- i 1 f 30 1 }$ -- -? - - -?1 LOT 109 c, spec x ^? 1 Ifi O ` tt . J i € i ,. , ' PN ? iLOT62 f al t ,tsrr snet (! {?ArtCa: x d M F 4'ber ?wcVor: - x,P' C- _ '?' Tb0 .mb _ ! DR ??? f !/ f p _ _ _ ?. / '-^, I v ' • -I LOTt? 3 - _ dF 4) 1 f Ls a Par p-.. --.._ . + +w P _ _ - _ 1 - ) V : ? ? ? ? 3B "? 1 t ? iabn` - -- '1 w lnwr a f_ t t % s ?Fw ep?Lev L?-.sce__ f. SRO i i ( G s (?9 8 e_ 1 1 1 I 1 m lot pm 1 1 ? F1 i? t _ 6 t r L ! t + t( I ? ` 91 t elf / 13 0 t / (Ira Qh t 1 1 1. 1 i? ZZOITF; keg / N,8 as g! _Q Is t g Iaa? a a ! iF r I (^Z a a !a #ga m 1 RNs } F 1 >ZpZ I } ! 1 1 Nm ?ai??a :? 1 $ i "8 ?? i [IP ti Irk 'Zzz i [• ! G l ? ? t 1tf t I ° II ? 1 ` t r• 44 ?5 g t 0 G 1 y5 SUNCDAST LAND SURVEYING In C. smNaas """ "? " , ? .,? , w BOUNDARY eM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD ? OLDSMAR, FLA. 34677 hdfirlk LB 4513 pH: OARY 854-1342 HO FAX: R CWN S-68 0 1 FLOOR PLAN o2-01-11 M M C 00081) 22u he o if P8 M {. ? o 3 e s a x w ? f? F w ^Q F Al m r Gz 9 a a b PROGRESS PRINT Feb 02, 2001 SURF STYLE / BRITTS D CITY OF CLEARWATER x FINFRO K O F CLEARWATER BEACH FLO110A $ i FINFROOKDE{ION, I ? SITE PLAN j 55 b b b bb z z ? ? 3 1 Hrt I tmx.. UO 1 1 I n 1 ' ?Aeas Svc „y ?,.?r. m4 .?Nw ?. ¦1 __ -- ~ \ - ?` wEnaw?w "I(?' ? _?T__' '-`}tetw.eoaxam.-? sw.N?iawiw ip I y I 6 I DIMAW!fi (9R 7tR N'fA 9=- I I I I I WALU PARTITIONS TYPES d ®PRECAST CONCRETE WALL WITH 2 j STUDS, GAUGE BY SLIT WALL MANUFACTURER METAL FURRMG STUDS ® 24' O C. PTLO MIN. R-11 NISULATION. WRL - SLAT 0 WALL' DISPLAY SYSTEM ATTACHED FROM iF O TOtr AFF. piYWALL ABOVE I3 TO INOERSIOE OF PRECAST pELN 0 ®SAME AS© WA'%1T SLAT WALL WI M LL U MP STp Y . ®rS11Al56AlK3E B1' SLAT WALL MANUFACTURED 1ETAL STIRS a A- OC. y Wry1)LAYER aF! TYPE'%'GWB FACN 9DE WILLRAVESLAT WN1AYSYSTEM LL ATTACHED FROM FF TOO 1rLFIBIFT) AFF. ON REiAA SIDE ONLY o Aoa Aoffa :.AEIE AS WIITIWI -UTWLL- D_R-HAY . w.Axoo. s rfs aAAO SMMW1p ALL - ®31 1 ME AS ®BUT Wl r ]D OA 9T11D9 .or?Arp s . MSj_p OA METAL STUgsALW O.C. wg1L _ LIVER OF i' iYPE'k' GWS EACN SIDE. ®9MIE AS ©BUL WfLMI, 9EE STRIA:Tl11ULL3 ®SAME AS ®CMU OKY NOTES 1-ALL METAL ST CONNECTED TO THE mL- USE SLIP TRACK' ON THE TOP FOR DEFLEL1Nl11 Z b MSIAATION Ai CEINA M TAN, WS RETAI, RESTAURANT AND NITCLLEN AREAS 3 WALL/ PA TI IONS TYPE i 'i j 2 [E]PRECAST CONCRETE WAIL MANUFACTURER GAUGE BY SIAT WNl MANUFACTURER T WiNR-11 1N?8I SYSTEM ATT A D FROM F O =• 6 T F 0 WALL'DISPLAY SYSTEM . ABOW VE W Id TO FROM TO 1B' AFF DRYWALL TO UlDERSIDE OF PRECAST DECK 6yt O }Cyr ®SAME AS®WrWTSIAt WALLWI DRYWALL Y ®PRECAST ONLY ?0 ®A FACTOREDS METAL TS S @ N' O.C. IL !i W1(1) UY R OF d TYP - GM EACH SIDE 36 j WKL NAVE 'SLAT WALL'OLSPLAY SYSTEM LL ATTACHED FROM FF TO 16(FT) AFF. ON RETAI SKIE ONLY ? w?ANOO, i ?F ___ _-_-_____ ®SAME AS ®WTRK)UT'SIAT WALL'DISPIAY oaon eaass -?-_-_-___-_-_-___ SYSTEM W/ptYWALL aaAe-ras ?? ? / I e ? ? j ®sAME AS ®BUr WV e•m GA Srws .o.A..Aa t ° l.AGAMETAISTUOSQN 'OC. Wryt) _-?- ® --1a-__©3s LAYER OF k TYM- GWB EACH SIDE. Gg i ®9AME AS ® BUT WR:NII, SEE SfR11CTlAULLS ?¦ ?_-_ I ®SAMEAS®CMUONLY NOTES 69 1 M1 1-ALL METAL STUDS CONNECTED TO THE i 1)I arAt? ... -ETRACK' ON THETOP FOR 1 ? ? ? ? RETAKE., AND KITC R.NG ? ARFAS QQ W Q g W Q LL KNe» aW er _J LU I w y _ JU w C\j i b I III ,^ W W 1 N F ?? I m?MRTN... ? L{: U) _ 3:ti R1b(O N - - maw ?e, p )' i BMEA. ?VJ 2? b a , I, MEZZANINE LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN A101A j j ICALA a„a I a I?D?? ?.? I I -? ? U I U I U I U I CU I I I I I I x a ap Gz ° 11 -I o-d°J_I -u IT! D mll Z r I ti PROGRESS PHNI vw, ro, cvn -rcdna, -18 -10 D SURF STYLE / BRITTS ` 1 a a CITY OF CLEARWATER FINFROCK 3 ? CLEARWATER REACH FLO RIGA ? p : ? W THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A eE a FINFROOK DESIGN, INC. I'il 7 I I !? I i I? 7 7 Y Y Gz -n -n 0 cc! I + ? 2• Z GI m, i I I Y e PROGRESS PRAT Jan 13, 2011 422pm -0 D SURF STYLE / BRITTS ml CITY OF CLEARWATER FINFROCK o' x CLEARWATER BEACH FLO RIGA FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. U I I Gz CU 0- C I .?? I II 0-14 -um z ?i I I I s I I I I a PROGRESS PRNT Jan 13, 2011 422pm r; SURF STYLE / BRITTS I ' ` D CITY OF CLEARWATER o e FINFROCK CLEA-A ER BEACH F'LORIOA Ul FINFROCK DEXION, INC. FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN s D SURF STYLE / BRITTS CITY OF CLEARWATER O ! CLEAf2WA1"Efi BEACH FlOR1OA SIXTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN n ?LLffi?' b t: -Los ? S A 3r PMEAPPLE GROVE MEDALLION. ?_.... _ STANDING SEAM NEPAL ROOF Z NORTH ELEVATION b. e' a, METAL FRAMED FABRIC CANOPY z ?..7 z /CD 1Bi? LU 0 Y L7 O - LL 2 U. SURF STYE LOGO'. WEST ELEVATION "GINNER a OV ?R STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF b ?6J 6 STANDING SEAM V u. METAL ROOM Z. 6 ? c PRECAST TYP ACNYLIC iEXNREO Z C Y > PAINT ON PRECAST 10 O Q CONCRETE,TYP g T V: -. - By . cc OWNER Q ?M a _ Ato * 3) .Tn itvri # ? 4 _ --- .ra rt LL ID tj- o ? x 7m \ r F'F 2?V.iSV=e M PARI(ING LE.D 3 •-- OPoMTRXJ u rte?.,.«m v a? SIGN ? ? pueaulwe oval R? -- . d ? .g _ ?; C{1 LGUVER AcGESS 6 REV-T / T i-1f-:?A1 5 PRECAST PhNEI -- ? f p? Q WM R SEA O STANDING SEAM METAi ROOM O METAL ROOM ACRYLIC TEXTONED PAWTON PRECAST r 6 Y' ?L 6 CONCRETE. TYP. W Q; co -N W N ICI - WIGHT 01 ^\ SIGN SV OWNER /y L-- ?a 35Y 7 a-AD]f0 IM 7VI7 ..PREVST TYP Y J 1 Q W (D 9m A6L y. ?O SW WI J ... - - ICI-NATURAL WRRE d L-13Y16 CITING ORANGE V) u evaPP)34U5 p. SOYY 83q?8 . AOOMI C 23Y P !71 i i4J BGAf?FIi?CEOONTROL S ._ Q O en ._ s 3 M LED PANAWG ? -'_.? L., VJ/1T INPOP WTXn C, _ ?w.uFnuar4 K t 3 U Spp SW SSlO REJWIlNTE M. y _ •---•-•-•-- •` P(.YW PaM?. BW+/36tl5 R388 E9 SRI91 SrR[I L?EM t? Vpol._ - f.-RYYIF M-19Y31, W-1T'W n f? LLLVAIIUN '!., .. ICJ,. C? OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS A402 SCALE 3,32'=,..D. A ALl IDEAS. DESIGNS. ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY T1 ]IS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF FINFRGCN DMC AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH TIIE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF THE IDEAS, DESIGNS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SI ]ALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON. FIRM. OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FINFROCR DMC. WARNING REPRODUCTION HEREOF IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE UNDER IB U.S.C. SECTION 5N UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE MAY CONSTITUTE TRADE SECRETS MISAPPROPRIATION IN VIOLATION OF 1.0.19-3-31.1 ET. SEG AND OTHER LAWS THE IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS DISCLOSED HEREIN MAYBE PATENTED OR BE THE SUBJECT OF PENDING PATENT APPLICATIONS. I l I i I I T i \ \ \ \\ \ i\ I I p cn m r --_-_- i C7 Z r m I' vA \ v o I cn0o< z i m z v G7 - ?? I ?' O V ?? C 0 D 0 I 9' \ I N0>> V? a V CD nr-0->i ;u M N m O N _ J °w z m I I ' 1 I ? I I I I I I I Z ? I I I I I I I I I ° DG) ail m 00 §II DC 0 LJ 0Z ajlo b ? ? r Dm II?r cf) N O D Z r m ! -D m D II Z 0 PROGRESS PHNT Jan 13, 2011 7:29p in N SURF STYLE / BRITTS - N A 00 o °X n m ! CITY OF CLEARWATER x . ' D m m FINFROCK o D CLEARWATER BEACH FLORIDA 3 'v ° FI GROUND LEVEL AREA COMPARISON PLAN o NFROCK DESIGN, INC. ALL IDEAS. DESIGNS. ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF FINFROCK OM AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT, NONE OF THE IDEAS DESIGNS. ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON. FIRM. OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE W' IATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FINFROCK DMC. WARNING. REPRODUCTION HEREOF IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE UNDER 10 JS C. SECTION SOB UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE MAY CONSTITUTE TRADE SECRETS MISAPPROPRIATION IN VIOLATION OF 1 C.]4-]J1.1 ET. SEC. AND OTHER LAWS THE IDEAS. ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS DISCLOSED HEREIN MAY BE PATENTED OR BE THE SUBJECT OF FENDING PAT[NT APPLICATIONS. O __-V O O = D X O C/) D O z ncnx > Q o T m ;u o .j 0 rj :r o X o K D zx? -i > -0 CD M 0 c n 0 C)< Z T O N 0cn0 iv O r D -6 C) o C cn ? r'v m ? O0cn m w? o z !I M N 411,DN nz b z !gym AID C/) IIz 0 r T m V D z 4 LJ PROGRESS PRNT Jan 13, 2011 7'29prn -II - - rt I I I ! I I I I i ! O O ------ - - -- -- -0 I I I ? I ! I I I ? I I ! i b ? o O ! Oll 00 SURF STYLE / BRITTS £ R - A ° o x D m CITY OF CLEARWATER x N° z W FINFROCK A, D CLEARWA-TER BEACH FLORIDA 3 .I 0 J V MEZZANINE -AREA COMPARISON PLAN 3 N o FINFROCK DESIGN, INC.