Loading...
Z98-02 (2)Z98-02 1200 MISSOURI AVE S SUNSHINE MALL Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect-, Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. T. DRCFINALSUNSHINEMAI.L i If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. r 1, r v ? v ? I Ill ?1i1 i w l l t 1 I t I."- n 31 ' I I l I' i l 1 1 m R 1 1 / 1 I. 1 ° - 1./Y . 3+. _ ? ! dnt 11 aw I tzn ! M ? •tn, + t. 2 it t 1 t t 1 t - 1 1 ( n G t a u N ~ " y u? • 1 1 , R." SUN ae?6a-w?a - N/~ 1 i 1 1 ? • .. ? • • S7 SSt 1 w I • e? j R y N r n ,t f, 1 4 1 l i F •. tt t:? tL WALL - -1 _ , .?T - u/fY If It ?1 ~1t' I 11? ' • • , 1 _- 1?.Y rt K I t 1. .. V •: -to P/ J I- T_ I t t i 1 t?--a7 i P.J. A t.. E V 1° I t S I G ? I 1 (T. Iu? '. ! if l l-'r ftTTi PROPOSED REZONING-AMENDMENT VNERS: John S. Taylor III and Fusco Corp. Z-98-02 iDRESS: 1200 S Missouri Avenue LAND USE PLAN ZONING ,OM: Commercial General CC and RM 28 and Residential High ?: Commercial General MPD and Residential High LAS PAGE: 296A and 306A PY ANNXNG AND Z40NTNC 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Soc. 15-29-15, M&B 34.0 1 Sec. 22-29-15, M&B 21.01 and 21.02 PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES); 35.4 Acres ^ RIGHT OF WAY: None ACRFC +?~ SEC: 15 TWP 29 S RGE: 15 E SEC: 22 TWP 29 S RGE: 15 E ... CITY COMMISSION: '1 ebniarY 5 ! 1937 Ordinance 6231-98 Feedback on Sunshine Mall Comment Request Earl: Zoning I have no info. on this, was not included in the preliminaries. I assume what was submitted was reviewed earlier Debbie Richter: Parks and Recreation 1) Open Space - The xi 'n square footage needs to be indicated on the site plan to determine whether an Open Space Dedication Fee is due for an expansion over 50%. If they are certifying only parcel #6 the question is can they use all of the credit for open space fees on this one parcel only (Leslie Dougall-Sides is researching legality). If certification is allowed for parcel #6 only, it does not appear the 2% Open Space fee will be due as parcel 6 includes 363,029 SF and according to the letter Mike Gust provided me, the Mall contained 430,573 SF. I would think that is OK so long as we understand that additional developments will have to pay the Open-Space Fee once 50% of the previous square footage is exceeded.1 2) Recreation Land - The applicant has not provided verifications required to calculate value per square foot. We will need both a copy of the most recent contract for purchase as well as the current year's property tax assessment. These Recreation Land Dedication fees are due prior to certification. The applicant needs to complete the worksheet they were provided and return to the Parks and Recreation Department with the check. Mr. Harris has been provided with this information and at the meeting said he has calculated what the fee would be. Without the information though, this cannot be completed. 3) Recreation Facilities - $200 per unit is due prior to building permit (200 units X $200= $40,000). So they would be ok here until ready to pull the permit. Again, this project cannot be certified until the above items noted are satisfied. Jeff Daniels: Fire 1) Gate width of Greenwood Entrance and Missouri Ave. 2) Island at gate of Greenwood entrance obstructing left turn 3) Turn radius around circle at fountain 1(j 4) Druid Road entrance showing "out" gate only 5 43 foot turning radius required throughout 2 6) All three story buildings require fire sprinklers - show all siamese connections & within 40' of hydrant. Tim Kurtz: Environmental/Landscape 1) Perimeter landscape buffer must be adjusted as needed and outparcel. Interior vehicular green space should be hatched. Zoning of site not shown. 2) Question concerning all contiguous streets and roads 3) Interior green space areas are questionable. It appears that applicant is counting all greenspace not.included in proposed buffers V?7 C 4) No tree survey included 5) Total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas are questionable and not hatched 6) Dimensions on the plan for some perimeter landscape buffers are not clear 7) Check for minimum 5' wide and minimum 100SF on interior landscape areas must be curbed. 8) Require landscape/tree placement plans must be submitted to and approved by City Landscape Architect prior to the issuance of any permits. From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 8:57 AM To: Parry, Mark Cc: Stone, Ralph Subject: RE: Sunshine Mall I concur that the City should not certify a conceptual plan. See previous emails and Code Sections 43.21 and 43.24 containing very specific requirements for site plan certification which a conceptual plan will rarely meet. Certifying one portion of this planned development at a time does pose later coordination problems which the applicant should be advised of. Perhaps a note on the first portion is appropriate stating that approval of subsequent portions or phases may trigger required amendments to the first portion. From: Parry, Mark Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 8:05 AM To: Chuck Warrington; Debbie Richter; Earl Dussault; Jeffrey Daniels; Jim Maglio; Leslie Sides; Michael Quillen; Mike Gust; Robert Guercia; Robert Perkins; Timothy Kurtz Subject: FW: Sunshine Mall Any other comments on this? From: Stone, Ralph Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 5:56 PM To: Parry, Mark Subject: RE: Sunshine Mall Mark-I would like to review site plan; I agree with you re. cert. conceptual plan; could we certifiy the conceptual plan w conditions related to the impacts individual phases might create? res From: Parry, Mark Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 1:54 PM To: Stone, Ralph Subject: RE: Sunshine Mall Ralph, It seems that we can not certify a Conceptual Plan. This is exactly what Richard Harris desires. It also seems that Rich's intention is to have each parcel certified individually. It seems to me that the potential for conflict exists if the conceptual plan is certified and as each parcel comes in for certification changes are necessary to make that particular parcel "work" which, will in turn, invalidate the original certification. Although all or most of the comments received to date have been address in these latest revisions, I'm not sure we can certify much more than the preliminary plat. I have several extra packets if you'd like to see what was distributed. Thanks, Mark r From: Richter, Debbie Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 11:13 AM To: Pant', Mark Subject: FW: Sunshine Mall FYI O Did 1562-48771 From: Kader, Art Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 10:00 AM To: Richter, Debbie Subject: RE: Sunshine Mall If a conceptual plan allows them to build then I would be opposed. They need to pay funds... From: Richter, Debbie Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 3:24 PM To: Kader, Art Subject: FW: Sunshine Mall FYI. According to Mark, they are waiting until the last possible moment to pay fees (whatever they will be). They would like to get a conceptual plan certified prior to certification of a site plan (and paying our fees). Not so sure what ramifications that would have but I'm hoping Legal responds. O De` 1562-48771 From: Parry, Mark Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 8:20 AM To: Chuck Warrington; Debbie Richter; Earl Dussault; Jeffrey Daniels; Jim Maglio; Leslie Sides; Michael Quillen; Mike Gust; Robert Guercia; Robert Perkins; Timothy Kurtz Cc: Lorenzo Aghemo; Lou Hilton; Ralph Stone; Sandra Glatthorn Subject: Sunshine Mall Well. They're in. Today, at some point you will find quite a packet courtesy of Richard Harrisand Florida Design Consultants. In it you will find: 1. a Concept Plan 2. a Preliminary Plat 3. Preliminary Plat Supplemental 4. SWFWMD Exemption Letter 5. FDOT Exemption Letter 6. A copy of the list of comments and concerns compiled by me which Rich used to come up with these revisions Rich went over all the comments with me yesterday afternoon. He seems to have covered them all. The only snag might be with Traffic concerning the funny egress/ingress onto Parcel 5/5A.. I know that all of you probably do not need to see all (if any) of this but I just wanted to make sure that everyone was looking at exactly the same thing. have a few questions myself. If anyone can answer them I'd appreciate it. e 1. the plans are at 100 scale and they're labeled as conceptual plans - can we certify that? 2. 1 understand that we will be certifying this project parcel by parcel. Is that we can certify a "conceptual plan" at a scale twice that which is allowed? 3. 1 do not have any records of a plat fee being paid. Has this been paid? I'll come up with other questions about three seconds after this E is sent. Thanks, Mark Clearwater U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: `Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering, Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your, comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRCFINALSUNSHINEMALL O ?w U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for-SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable , please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. ST/LL w6T LeC-.9Tic.vs e e Jji41re CJC DRCRNALSUNSHINHMAM t LL k. U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gras System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMI D FOR CERTIFICATION. ., DRCFINALSUNSHINEMALL At 00 From: Dussault, Earl Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 1:40 PM To: Parry, Mark Subject: RE: Re; Sunshine Mall i would think under an MPD each parcel could be certified as it reaches the point of happening. If one master plan is certified, revisions could cause many recerts. From: Parry, Mark Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 1:31 PM To: Chuck Warrington; Debbie Richter; Earl Dussault; Jeffrey Daniels; Jim Maglio; Leslie Sides; Michael Quillen; Mike Gust; Robert Guercia; Robert Perkins; Timothy Kurtz Subject: Re; Sunshine Mall Legal says we can't certify a Conceptual Plan. Is there any reason that we couldn't certify Sheet Two of Two currently entitled "Sunshine Mall Subdivision; Preliminary Plat; Supplemental Drawing; Proposed Conditions" This sheet seems to have all the information that the recently resubmitted Conceptual Plan has and more (all for the low, low price of $19.95 plus shipping and handling). It should probably be retitled something like "Sunshine Mall Subdivision; Preliminary Plat; Site Plan". What's the consensus on this? Also, if we certify that sheet as a site plan, do they need to come back and certify each individual parcel? Would it not be better if each parcel came in through building permit? Thanks for you comments, Mark From: Perkins, Robert Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 1:38 PM To: Parry, Mark Subject: RE: Re; Sunshine Mail Right now we should only be certifying Phase 6 and the preliminary plat. The plat can include the entire site ...bp From: Parry, Mark Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 1:31 PM To: Chuck Warrington; Debbie Richter; Earl Dussault; Jeffrey Daniels; Jim Maglio; Leslie Sides; Michael Quillen; Mike Gust; Robert Guercia; Robert Perkins; Timothy Kurtz Subject: Re; Sunshine Mall Legal says we can't certify a Conceptual Plan. Is there any reason that we couldn't certify Sheet Two of Two currently entitled "Sunshine Mall Subdivision; Preliminary Plat; Supplemental Drawing; Proposed Conditions" This sheet seems to have all the information that the recently resubmitted Conceptual Plan has and more (all for the low, low price of $19.95 plus shipping and handling). It should probably be retitled something like "Sunshine Mall Subdivision; Preliminary Plat; Site Plan". What's the consensus on this? Also, if we certify that sheet as a site plan, do they need to come back and certify each individual parcel? Would it not be better if each parcel came in through building permit? Thanks for you comments, Mark F'>Feedb'*ack on Sunshine Mall Comment Request Debbie Richter: Parks and Recreation 1) Open Space - The existing square footage needs to be indicated on the site plan to determine whether an Open Space Dedication Fee is due for an expansion over 50%. If they are certifying only parcel #6 the question is can they use all of the credit for open space fees on this one parcel only (Leslie Dougall-Sides is researching legality). If certification is allowed for parcel #6 only, it does not appear the 2% Open Space fee will be due as parcel 6 includes 363,029 SF and according to the letter Mike Gust provided me, the Mall contained 430,573 SF. I would think that is OK so long as we understand that additional developments will have to pay the Open Space Fee or-ice 50% of the previous square footage is exceeded. 2) Recreation Land - The applicant has not provided verifications required to calculate value per square foot. We will need both a copy of the most recent contract for purchase as well as the current year's property tax assessment. These Recreation Land Dedication fees are due prior to certification. The applicant needs to complete the worksheet they were provided and return to the Parks and Recreation Department with the check. Mr. Harris has been provided with this information and at the meeting said he has calculated what the fee would be. Without the information though, this cannot be completed. 3) Recreation Facilities - $200 per unit is due prior to building permit (200 units X $200= $40,000). So they would be ok here until ready to pull the permit. Again, this project cannot be certified until the above items noted are satisfied. Jett' Daniels: Fire 1) Gate width of Greenwood Entrance and Missouri Ave. 2) Island at gate of Greenwood entrance obstructing left turn 3) Turn radius around circle at fountain 4) Druid Road entrance showing "out" gate only 5) 43 foot turning radius required throughout 6) All three story buildings require fire sprinklers - show all siamese connections within 40' of hydrant. Tim Kurtz: Environmental/Landscape 1) Perimeter landscape buffer must be adjusted as needed and outparcel. Interior vehicular green space should be hatched. Zoning of site not shown. 2) Question concerning all contiguous streets and roads 3) Interior green space areas are questionable. It appears that applicant is counting all greenspace not included in proposed buffers 4) No tree survey included 5) Total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas are questionable and not hatched 6) Dimensions on the plan for some perimeter landscape buffers are not clear 'n Check for minimum 5' wide and minimum 100SF on interior landscape areas must be curbed. 8) Require landscape/tree placement plans must be submitted to and approved by City Landscape Architect prior to the issuance of any permits. Mike Quillen/Bob Perkins: Engineering Show all utilities - storm water, relocation of utilities, etc. Mar-10-98 01:03P FOOT 07 OPERATIONS 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tAWTOR CHILES T"OK" r MM Jr OOiEtrtOR q7 • MYU6clmedACOt1t MrsBemeK 11th N. Md(We7' Dr, Tao'i. FT. Sl612 SECK9TAKT (7113) 9746263 * TSW22677.t11 • Fa 9754278 March 10, 1998 Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP Vice President/ Transportation Planning . Florida Design Consultants, Inc 2639 Me Cormack Drive Clearwater, Florida 33759 RI.:: Sunshine Mail- Determination of Significant Change SR 651( Missouri Avenue) Section: 15007 Dear Mr. Pergolizzi: In response to your request for a Determination of Significant Change as defined in Rule Chapter 14-97.002, we offer the following: 1, The proposed site uses as you have explained, will not constitute a "signif"icant change" from the existing uses. Therefore, a new access connection permit is not required. 2. However, should the land uses change and traffic volumes increase significantly, you may need to obtain an FDOT Access Connection Permit. If you proposes construction in the State ROW you would also be required to obtain a permit. Please do not hesitate to contact this office a# (813) 975-6055 if you should have additional questions.- - - - - Sincerely, u h A. Smith cc ss Management Development Coordinator c.?rEltMna+fuunr?7:Tefu/ ?,,7 03-10-1998 01:14PM 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 Mar-10-98 01:03P FOOT 07 OPERATIONS 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 / FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tAWMM CHILES TnOKAS r. MRRY, Jr OOVEtnOR SECUTAKT ?)T • Mrnrwm/aeoelt MtrutCnela t li„ N. MdCt>ti Dr. Tam'L FI. 5.1612 X7173)97%6263 * T-SM126.72M • F= rISA272 March 10, 1998 RobertC. Pergolizzi, AICP Vice President/ Transportation Planning Florida Design Consultants, Inc 2639 Me Cormack Drive Clearwater, Florida 33759 PLE: Sunshine Mall- Determination of Significant Change SR 651( Missouri Avenue) Section: 15007 Dear Mr. Pergolizzi: In response to your request for a Determination of Significant Change as defined in Rule Chapter 14-97-002, we ofrer the following: t . The proposed site uses as you have explained, will not constitute a "significant change' from the existing uses. Therefore, a new access connection permit is not required. 2. However, should the land uses change and traffic volumes increase significantly, you may need to obtain an FDO'r Access Connection Permit. If you proposes construction in the State ROW you would also be required to obtain a permit. Plca,w do not hesitate to contact this Office at (813) 975-6055 if you should have additional questions. Sincerely, u h A. Smith cc ss Management Development Coordinator QVCRMn-%UU17Y\b1t=M 01 03-10-1998 01:14PM 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 Mar-10-98 01:03P FOOT 07 OPERATIONS 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 / FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION {AWFQA CHILES rnoNA9 G eAHla dr. OOWAROX aecRCn.Rr iTf • M2ftYC1u>rOrlACOe11 Mun11261 N. MdCWry Or. Tamrz F1. 33i12 P13) 9741263 * I-SW ti•7220 • Fox 975.6271 March 10, 1998 Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP Vice President/ Transportation Planning Florida Design Consultants, Inc 2639 Mc Cormack Drive Clearwater, Florida 33750 RE: Sunshine Mall- Determination of Significant Change SR 651( Missouri Avenue) Section: 15007 I)ear Mr. Pergolizzi: In response to your request for a Determination of Significant Change as defined in Rule Chapter 14-97.002, we offer the following: l . The proposed site uses as you have explained, will not constitute a "significant change" from the existing uses. Therefore, a new access connection permit is not required. 2. However, should the land uses change and traffic volumes increase significantly, you may need to obtain an FDOT Access Connection Permit. If you proposes construction in the State ROW you would also be required to obtain a permit. 131case do not he to contact this office at (813) 975-6055 if you should-have additional questions-. - - Sincerely, u rhA. Smith cc anagement Development Coordinator C.TGRMrrgulJI J VIA-ruRm 651 03-10-1998 01:14PM 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street • Brooksville. Florida 34609-6899 . 1-800-423-1476 (Florida Only) or (352) 796-7211 • SUNCOM 628-4150 • T.D.D. Number Only (Florida Only): 1-800-231-6103 Internet address: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/swfwmd 76C grvvcy 301 North rcrc? cddc 336310759 1•:0 ?364^797 cr (813) 985.7_91 SUNC::.l 578-2070 170 Century Bcuevcrd 115 Corporation Wcy 2203 Highwcy 4,1 West Eartow. F!cricc 33830-77CO Venice. Florida 34292.3524 nverness. Florica 34--,53-3809 1-c00-492.7862 c: (941) 534.1448 1-600.320-'.,503 or (941) 46-'. 2;2 1352) 637-1360 SUNCOM 5720200 SUNCOM 5260900 Roy G. Harrell, Jr. Chcirmcn. St. Petersburg Joe L Davis, Jr. Vice Chairmen, Wauchula Curtis L Law Secretary. Land O' lakes Sally Thompson Treasurer. Tampa James L Allen Bushnell Ramon F. Campo Brandon Rebecca M. Eger Sarasota John P. Horilee, IV Bradenton Ronald C. Johnson Lcke Weles James E. Martin St. Petersburg Brenda Menendez Tampa E. D. "Sonny" Vergaro Executive Director Edward B. Helvenston General Counsel December 16, 1997 Robert N. Hatfield BBR Properties, Inc. 2026 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 25.0 Atlanta, GA 30339 Subject: Project Evaluation/Permit Not Required Project Name: Sunshine Mall Inquiry Number: 983130/CT#39924 County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/R?e: 15 & 22/29S/15E Latitude/Longitude: 27057'15.24'1/82047'20.9911 Reference: Chapter 40D-4.041, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Dear Mr. Hatfield: The District has reviewed information received on December 2, 1997 and December 8, 1997 for the project referenced above to determine if the activities proposed are regulated by District rules. Based on the information you provided and the statutes and rules in effect at the time of this determination, the District has concluded that an Environmental Resource Permit will not be required for the site renovation resulting in a decrease of 143,000± sf of building area and a decreae of 560,000 ± sf of vehicular use area. Plans and information submitted will be kept on file in the Tampa Service Office in support of this decision. - - - This -notification to you does riot-mean that the District has determined that your project is 1 1 permanently exempt from permitting requirements nor does it relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining other permits or approvals (federal, state or local) that may be required for the project. This determination may not be valid in the event future changes occur in the applicable statutes or rules. Additionally, project modifications may necessitate further evaluation or permitting by the District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning any work which is not specifically described in your submittal. The District's notice of its determination that your project qualifies as an exempt activity constitutes final agency action by the District. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's determination regarding your project may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and Part V of Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C. _A request for hearine must (1) state any disputed issues of material fact; (2) explain how each petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the District's action: and (3) otherwise comply with Rule 40D 1.52 1F A C . fkrolt,&I I A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the Agency Clerk of the-District ? ?r1c1?(11' ?? rt7? t WA. BBR Properties, Inc. Page 2 December 16, 1997 at the District's Brooksville address within 14 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57 F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., of any administrative dispute regarding the District's determination in this matter is not available. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E. at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045. Please reference the Project Name and Inquiry Number in future communications concerning this project. - Sincerely, John W. Heuer, P.G. Director Tampa Regulation Department JWH:ssk cc: Debbie Summerall/Inquiry No. 983130/CT439924 Richard M. Alt, P.E. Richard D. Harris, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. ASSESSMENT OF OPEN SPACE/RECREATION IMPACT (New Residential Developments of 8 Units or More) TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DEVELOPER: DATE: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: # OF UNITS: PARCEL GROSS LAND AREA: PARCEL NET LAND AREA: MOST RECENT SALE PRICE OR CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE: $ (VERIFICATION REQUIRED) JUST VALUE OF LAND ONLY ACCORDING TO CURRENT YEAR'S PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT: $ (VERIFICATION REQUIRED) VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT: $ (SALE PRICE OR JUST VALUE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, _ BY GROSS LAND AREA) I ATTEST THAT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ABOVE IS CORRECT, COMPLETE AND TRUE. PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE DATE NOTE: All fees payable to the "City of Clearwater". Open Space and Recreation Facility Land fees should be submitted. to the Parks and Recreation Department, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Tees should be submitted to the central Fermitting Department at the same address. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS 1. OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT Parcel Net Land Area x SF Open Space Factor x .040 Open Space Assessment SF II. RECREATION FACILITY LAND ASSESSMENT # of Units in Project Recreation Facility Land Factor x 150 SF Recreation Facility Land Assessment SF (Not to exceed 6% of parcel net land area if private facilities provided) III. RECREATION FACILITY ASSESSMENT # of Units in Project Recreation Facility Factor x $200 Recreation Facility Assessment $ RECOMMENDATIONS LAND VALUE DOLLARS PAYMENT DUE 1. Open Space Fee ....................... SF X SF = $ _ Certified Final Site PlanA II. Recreation Facility Land Fee... SF X SF = $ Certified Final Site Plan/Plat III. Recreation Facility Fee ...............................................:....................= $ Building Permit TOTAL ...........................................................................................= $ PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE DATE .,: amater Parks and Recreation s:\Parks\Forms\1600-0310B Impact Fee Form #2-Revised 11/20/97-Completed form to be retained in Parks and Recreation Administrative Office according to City and State Records Management guidelines. V Feedback on Sunshine Mall Comment Request Earl: Zoning I have no info. on this, was not included in the preliminaries. I assume what was submitted was reviewed earlier Debbie Richter: Parks and Recreation 1) Open Space - The existing square footage needs to be indicated on the site plan to determine whether an Open Space Dedication Fee is due for an expansion over 50%. If they are certifying only parcel #6 the question is can they use all of the credit for open space fees on this one parcel only (Leslie Dougall-Sides is researching legality). If certification is allowed for parcel #6 only, it does not appear the 2% Open Space fee will be due as parcel 6 includes 363,029 SF and according to the letter Mike Gust provided me, the Mall contained 430,573 SF. I would think that is OK so long as we understand that additional developments will have to pay the Open Space Fee once 50% of the previous square footage is exceeded. 2) Recreation Land - The applicant has not provided verifications required to calculate value per square foot. We will need both a copy of the most recent contract for purchase as well as the current year's property tax assessment. These Recreation Land Dedication fees are due prior to certification. The applicant needs to complete the worksheet they were provided and return to the Parks and Recreation Department with the check. Mr. Harris has been provided with this information and at the meeting said he has calculated what the fee would be. Without the information though, this cannot be completed. 3) Recreation Facilities - $200 per unit is due prior to building permit (200 units X $200= $40,000). So they would be ok here until ready to pull the permit. Again, this project cannot be certified until the above items noted are satisfied. Jeff Daniels: Fire 1) Gate width of Greenwood Entrance and Missouri Ave. 2) Island at gate of Greenwood entrance obstructing left turn 3) Turn radius around circle at fountain 4) Druid Road entrance showing "out" gate only 5) 43 foot turning radius required throughout 6) All three story buildings require fire sprinklers - show all siamese connections within 40' of hydrant. Tim Kurtz: Environmental/Landscape 1) Perimeter landscape buffer must be adjusted as needed and outparcel. Interior vehicular green space should be hatched. Zoning of site not shown. 2) Question concerning all contiguous streets and roads 3) Interior green space areas are questionable. It appears that applicant is counting all greenspace not included in proposed buffers 4) No tree survey included 5) Total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas are questionable and not hatched 6) Dimensions on the plan for some perimeter landscape buffers are not clear 7) Check for minimum 5' wide and minimum 100SF on interior landscape areas must be curbed. S) Require landscape/tree placement plans must be submitted to and approved by City Landscape Architect prior to the issuance of any permits. Feedback on Sunshine Mall Comment Request Earl: Zoning I have no info. on this, was not included in the preliminaries. I assume what was submitted was reviewed earlier Debbie Richter: Parks and Recreation 1) Open Space - The i in square footage needs to be indicated on the site plan to determine whether an Open Space Dedication Fee is due for an expansion over 50%. If they are certifying only parcel #6 the question is can they use all of the credit for open space fees on this one parcel only (Leslie Dougall-Sides is researching legality). If certification is allowed for parcel #6 only, it does not appear the 2% Open Space fee will be due as parcel 6 includes 363,029 SF and according to the letter Mike Gust provided me, the Mall contained 430,573 SF. I would think that is OK so long as we understand that additional developments will have Po pay the Open-Space Fee once 50% of the previous square footage is exceeded., 2) Recreation Land - The applicant has not provided verifications required to calculate value per square foot. We will need both a copy of the most recent contract for purchase as well as the current year's property tax assessment. These Recreation Land Dedication fees are due prior to certification. The applicant needs to complete the worksheet they were provided and return to the Parks and Recreation Department with the check. Mr. Harris has been provided with this information and at the meeting said he has calculated what the fee would be. Without the information though, this cannot be completed. 3) Recreation Facilities - $200 per unit is due prior to building permit (200 units X $200= $40,000). So they would be ok here until ready to pull the permit. Again, this project cannot be certified until the above items noted are satisfied. Jeff Daniels: Fire 1) Gate width of Greenwood Entrance and Missouri Ave. 2) Island at gate of Greenwood entrance obstructing left turn 3) Turn radius around circle at fountain 4) Druid Road entrance showing "out" gate only 5) 43 foot turning radius required throughout 6) All three story buildings require fire sprinklers - show all siamese connections within 40' of hydrant. Tim Kurtz: Environmental/Landscape 1) Perimeter landscape buffer must be adjusted as needed and outparcel. Interior vehicular green space should be hatched. Zoning of site not shown. 2) Question concerning all contiguous streets and roads 3) Interior green space areas are questionable. It appears that applicant is counting all greenspace not included in proposed buffers f 4 ,a$. 4) No tree survey included 5) Total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas are questionable and not hatched 6) Dimensions on the plan for some perimeter landscape buffers are not clear 7) Check for minimum 5' wide and minimum 100SF on interior landscape areas must be curbed. 8) Require landscape/tree placement plans must be submitted to and approved by City Landscape Architect prior to the issuance of any permits. w ?• y O ater U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; ,Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial, date and return. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRCFINALSUNSHINEMALL JT ` f FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTA[ISTS,SURVEYORSbPUW0, December 1, 1998 Mr. Mark Parry, Planner City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Administration City Municipal Services Building 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 34618 RE: Sunshine Mail Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Dear Mark: We are enclosing for your use and certification, sixteen copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Supplemental Drawing for the above referenced project. The revisions are as follows: 1) Page 1 - Buildings are now shown as demolished. " 2) '. , Page 1 - The Words Site Plan have been added to the preliminary plat so that the words Preliminary Plat and Site Plan are shown. 3) Sheet 2 - The words Site Plan have been added so that the words Preliminary Plat and Site Plan are shown. What we desire to achieve with this submittal is to be at a point that upon the resolution of the open space fees, this Site Plan can be certified and we would be able to proceed with the final permitting of the project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this submittal. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Richard D. Harris, P.E. Senior Project Manager :sp L:ApaM_3 Encl. cc: Bob Hatfield, BBR Properties,W/encl. File 180=0.1 2639 McCORMiCK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 (727) 724-8422 • FAX (727) 724-8606 O ?.. JJ7J,'. U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent, Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial, date and return. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. 7r- Z/ X DRMNALSUNSHINSMALL ./ , Smaw 2ENGINEERS LORIDA DESIGN CONSUL. (ANTS, INC. ,ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYOR56PUWNERS December 1, 1998 Mr. Mark Parry, Planner City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Administration City Municipal Services Building 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 34618 RE: Sunshine Mall Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Dear Mark: We are enclosing for your use and certification, sixteen copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Supplemental Drawing for the above referenced project. The revisions are as follows: 1) Page 1 - Buildings are now shown as demolished. 2) Page 1 - The words Site Plan have been added to the preliminary plat so that the words Preliminary Plat and Site Plan are shown. 3) Sheet 2 - The words Site Plan have been added so that the words Preliminary Plat and Site Plan are shown. What we desire to achieve with this submittal is to be at a point that upon the resolution of the open space fees, this Site Plan can be certified and we would be able to proceed with the final permitting of the project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this submittal. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Richard D. Harris, P.E. Senior Project Manager :SP LApa".3 Encl. cc: _ Bob Hatfield, BBR Properties, w/encl. File 180-01 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33769 (727) 724-8422 • FAX (727) 724-8606 LL f: ... ?. ?$:: r?wa er U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshill; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From:. Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial, date and return. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or c yo comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FEQR RTIFIC4Y1ON. lei/l/l MCFINALSLINSMNEMALL FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMEMMUSTS, SURVEYORS& PLANNERS December 1, 1998 Mr. Mark Parry, Planner City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Administration City Municipal Services Building 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 34618 RE: Sunshine Mall Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Dear Mark: We are enclosing for your use and certification, sixteen copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Supplemental Drawing for the above referenced project. The revisions are as follows: 1) Page 1 - Buildings are now shown as demolished. 2) Page 1 - The words Site Plan have been added to the preliminary plat so that the words Preliminary Plat and Site Plan are shown. 3) Sheet 2 - The words Site Plan have been added so that the words Preliminary Plat and Site Plan are shown. What we desire to achieve with this submittal is to be at a point that upon the resolution of the open space fees, this Site Plan can be certified and we would be able to proceed with the final permitting of the project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this submittal. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Richard D. Harris, P.E. Senior Project Manager :sp Upany.3 Encl. cc: Bob Hatfield, BBR Properties, w/encl. File 180-01 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 (727) 724-8422 • FAX (727) 724-8606 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS&PLANNERS November 16, 1998 Mr. Mark Parry Planning and Development Services City of Clearwater Municipal Services Building 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Sunshine Mall (AKA Renaissance Square) Dear Mark: Pursuant to your fax dated November 6, 1998, we are enclosing for certification the following items: 1) Sixteen copies Concept Plan 2) Sixteen copies Preliminary Plat 3) _ Sixteen copies Preliminary Plat Supplemental Drawing 4) Sixteen copies SWFWMD Exemption Letter 5) Sixteen copies FDOT Exemption Letter These plans address the review comments in your fax and we wish to be in a position that these plans can be certified upon resolution of the Parks and Recreation impact fees. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this project. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Richard D. Harris, P.E. Senior Project Manager : sp L:\panry.I Encl. cc: Bob Hatfield, Clearwater Group, Ltd, w/encl. File 180-01 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 . .(727) 724-8422 • FAX (727) 724-8606 CA- !.: is f: }}t O ` ``F FAD. r•:: fw ??r?wa ?r Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent, Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRMNALSUNSHINEMALL ' It i At: (.b-,. :aria &.114, rtr Roy G. Harrell, Jr. Chairman. St. Petersburg Joe L Davis, Jr. Vice Chairman. Wauchula Curtis L Law Secretary. Land O'Lakes Sally Thompson Treasurer. Tampa James L Allen Bushnell Ramon F. Campo Brandon Rebecca M. Eger Sarasota John P. Harilee, IV Bradenton Ronald C. Johnson Lcke Wales James E. Martin St. Petersburg Brenda Menendez Tampa E. D. "Sonny" Vergara Executive Director Edward B. Helvenston General Counsel Southwest Florida) Water Management District 2379 Broad Street • Brooksville. Florida 34609-6899 • 1-800-423-1476 (Florida Only) or (352) 796-7211 • SUNCOM 628-4150 • T.D.O. Number Only (Florida Only): 1-800-231-6103 Internet address: http://www.dep.stcte.fl.us/swfwmd 76u,;n,uey 301 North 170 Century Sculevcrd 115 Corporchon Wcy 2:03 Highwcy 44 Wes; rcn-cz =cridc ...,637.6759 Sorrow. F.cdcc 33830-7700 Venice. Poricc 34292-3524 nverness. Rortco 3.253.3809 1-!0: 36-0797 cr(813)985-7181 1-600.492.7862 cr(941) 534.1448 1-8C0-320-M or(941) 486-;212 (352)637.1360 5i; CC?1578.2010 SUNCCM 572.6200 SUNCC)M 5266;M December 16, 1997 Robert N. Hatfield BBR Properties, Inc. 2026 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 250 Atlanta, GA 30339 Subject: Project Evaluation/Permit Not Required Project Name: Sunshine Mall Inquiry Number: 983130/CT#39924 County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/Rge: 15 & 22/29S/15E Latitude/Longitude- 27057'15.24'782047'20.99" Reference: Chapter 40D-4.041, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Dear Mr. Hatfield: The District has reviewed information received on December 2, 1997 and December 8, 1997 for the project referenced above to determine if the activities proposed are regulated by District rules. Based on the information you provided and the statutes and rules in effect at the time of this determination, the District has concluded that an Environmental Resource Permit will not be required for the site renovation resulting in a decrease of 143,000± sf of building area and a decreae of 560,000 ± sf of vehicular use area. Plans and information submitted will be kept on file in the Tampa Service Office in support of this decision. --This -notification to you does not-mean that the District has determined that your project is permanently exempt from permitting requirements nor does it relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining other permits or approvals (federal, state or local) that may be required for the project. This determination may not be valid in the event future changes occur in the applicable statutes or rules. Additionally, project modifications may necessitate further evaluation or permitting by the District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning any work which is not specifically described in your submittal. The District's notice of its determination that your project qualifies as an exempt activity constitutes final agency action by the District. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's determination regarding your project may request an I administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and Part V of Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C. A request for hearing must (1) state any disDuted issues of material fact: (2) explain how each petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the District's action, and (3) otherwise comply with Rule 40D 1.52 1F A C . rl:Pu"((Q'lI I A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the Agency Clerk of the-District ? ?l(cI1'!II' BBR Properties, Inc. Page 2 December 16, 1997 at the District's Brooksville address within 14 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57 F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., of any administrative dispute regarding the District's determination in this matter is not available. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E. at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045. Please reference the Project Name and Inquiry Number in future communications concerning this project. Sincerely, G? ??c?s. p, - John W. Heuer, P.G. 0 Director Tampa Regulation Department JWH:ssk cc: Debbie Summerall/Inquiry No. 983130/CT#39924 Richard M. Alt, P.E. Richard D. Harris, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. {cc...:iU1^ ::arin•Ear•i,rtr Roy G. Harrell, Jr. Chairman. St. Petersburg Joe 1 Davis, Jr. Vice Chairman. Wauchula Curtis L Law Secretary. Land O'Lakes Sally Thompson Treasurer. Tampa James L. Allen Bushnell Ramon f. Campo Brandon Rebecca M. Eger Sarasota John P. Horllee, IV Bradenton Ronald C. Johnson Lcke Wales James E. Martin St. Petersburg Brenda Menendez Tampa E. D. "Sonny" Vergaro Executive Director Edward B. Helvenston General Counsel Tltr??u,?lt (>uctli t 1 ?? r1 r« Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street • Brooksville. Florida 34609-6899 • 1-800-423-1476 (Florida Only) or (352) 796-7211 • SUNCOM 628-4150 • T.D.D. Number Only (Florida Only): 1-800-231-6103 Internet address: http://www.dep.state-fl.us/swfwmd 7C:' -grwcy 301 North 1'crc_- :1 adc 33637-0759 I-KC -::x;797 or (813) 985.7291 SUNC_?l 578.2070 December 16, 1997 170 Caniury Bculevcro 115 Corporation Way 2'03 Highway 44 west Bartow. Rcacc 33830-77C0 Venice. Florida 34292.3524 nverness. Rorica 34=53-3809 I-8CA-492.7862 cr (941) 534.1448 I.8C0.320-'x M or ,941) 486-;2; 2 (352) 637-1360 SUNCOM 572-6209 SUNCOM 526-6900 Robert N. Hatfield BBR Properties, Inc. 2026 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 250 Atlanta, GA 30339 Subject: Project Evaluation/Permit Not Required Project Name: Sunshine Mall Inquiry Number: 983130/CT#39924 County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/Rge: 15 & 22/29S/15E Latitude/Lonsitude: 27057'15.24,t/82047'20.99" Reference: Chapter 40D-4.041, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Dear Mr. Hatfield: The District has reviewed information received on December 2, 1997 and December 8, 1997 for the project referenced above to determine if the activities proposed are regulated by District rules. Based on the information you provided and the statutes and rules in effect at the time of this determination, the District has concluded that an Environmental Resource Permit will not be required for the site renovation resulting in a decrease of 143,000± sf of building area and a decreae of 560,000 ± sf of vehicular use area. Plans and information submitted will be kept on file in the Tampa Service Office in support of this decision. --This-notification to you does riot mean that the District has determined that your project is permanently exempt from permitting requirements nor does it relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining other permits or approvals (federal, state or local) that may be required for the project. This determination may not be valid in the event future changes occur in the applicable statutes or rules. Additionally, project modifications may necessitate further evaluation or permitting by the District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning any work which is not specifically described in your submittal. The District's notice of its determination that your project qualifies as an exempt activity constitutes final agency action by the District. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's determination regarding your project may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and Part V of Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C. A request for hearing must (1) state any disputed issues of material fact, (2) explain how each vetitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the District's action, and (3) otherwise comply with Rule 40D 1.52 1F A C . A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the Agency Clerk of the-District BBR Properties, Inc. Page 2 December 16, 1997 at the District's Brooksville address within 14 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57 F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., of any administrative dispute regarding the District's determination in this matter is not available. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E. at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045. Please reference the Project Name and Inquiry Number in future communications concerning this project. Sincerely, /r John W. Heuer, P.G. 0 Director Tampa Regulation Department JWH:ssk cc: Debbie Summerall/Inquiry No. 983130/CT#39924 Richard M. Alt, P.E. Richard D. Harris, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 1 Roy G. Harrell, Jr. Chairman. St. Petersburg Joe L Davis, Jr. Vice Chairman. Wouchula Curtis L Law Secretary. Land C' Lakes Sally Thompson Treasurer. Tampa James L Allen Bushnell Ramon F. Campo Brandon Rebecca M. Eger Sarasota John P. Horllee, IV Bradenton Ronald C. Johnson Lake Wales James E. Martin St. Petersburg Brenda Menendez Tampa E. D. "Sonny" Vergara Executive Director Edward B. Helvenston General Counsel Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street • Brooksville. Florida 34609-6899 • 1-800-423-1476 (Florida Only) or (352) 796-7211 • SUNCOM 628-4150 • T.D.O. Number Only (Florida Only): 1-800-231-6103 Internet address: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/swfwmd 764* -:g xcy 301 North 170 Canh N BcWevcrd 115 Corporation Wcy 2303 Highwcy 41 West Tcr-cc =cddc 32637.6759 80r ow. Flcricc 33830.7700 Venice. Florida 34292.3524 Inverness. Florica 31:53.3809 1•.0::36-0791 cr (813) 985.7:91 1-cCC-492-7862 v (941) 534.1448 1-8CO.320-3503 or (941) 486-;2!2 (352) 6?7.1360 5UhCC%I 578.2070 SUNCCM 572-A.200 SUNCOM 526.6900 December 16, 1997 Robert N. Hatfield BBR Properties, Inc. 2026 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 250 Atlanta, GA 30339 Subject: Project Evaluation/Permit Not Required Project Name: Sunshine Mall Inquiry Number: 983130/CT#39924 County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/Rge: 15 & 22/29S/15E Latitude/Lon,citude: 27057'15.24'1/82047'20.99" Reference: Chapter 40D-4.041, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Dear Mr. Hatfield: The District has reviewed information received on December 2, 1997 and December 8, 1997 for the project referenced above to determine if the activities proposed are regulated by District rules. Based on the information you provided and the statutes and rules in effect at the time of this determination, the District has concluded that an Environmental Resource Permit will not be required for the site renovation resulting in a decrease of 143,000± sf of building area and a decreae of 560,000 ± sf of vehicular use area. Plans and information submitted will be kept on file in the Tampa Service Office in support of this decision. - -- --This -notification to you does not-mean that the District has determined that your project is permanently exempt from permitting requirements nor does it relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining other permits or approvals (federal, state or local) that may be i required for the project. This determination may not be valid in the event future changes occur in the applicable statutes or rules. Additionally, project modifications may necessitate further evaluation or permitting by the District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning any work which is not specifically described in your submittal. The District's notice of its determination that your project qualifies as an exempt activity constitutes final agency action by the District. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's determination regarding your project may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and Part V of Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C. A request for hearing must (1) state any disputed issues of material fact: (2) explain how each petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the District's action: and (3) otherwise comply with Rule 40D 1.52 1F A C . Tltrotl,dt I I A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the Agency Clerk of the-District ? ?llct?(li' 5i rviLi BBR Properties, Inc. Page 2 December 16, 1997 at the District's Brooksville address within 14 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57 F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., of any administrative dispute regarding the District's determination in this matter is not available. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E. at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045. Please reference the Project Name and Inquiry Number in future communications concerning this project. Sincerely, r John W. Heuer, P.G. Director Tampa Regulation Department JWH:ssk cc: Debbie Summerall/Inquiry No. 983130/CT#39924 Richard M. Alt, P.E. Richard D. Harris, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE W. BARNES JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS MICHAEL T. CRONIN DUANE A. DAIKER ELIZABETH J. DANIELS LISA B. DODGE MARION HALE JAMES W. HUMANN SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. 1AKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.* MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT DAVID J. OTTINGER F. WALLACE POPE, JR. DARRYL R. RICHARDS DENNIS G. RUPPEL• CHARLES A. SAMARKOS JOHN A. SCHAEFER PHILIP M. SHASTEEN CHARLES M.TATELBAUM JOAN M. VECCHIOLI ANTHONY P. ZINGE JULIUS J. ZSCHAU *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 39193.98381 HAND DELIVERY Mr. Lorenzo Aghemo, Director Central Permitting 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 34616 July 16, 1998 Re: Application to Amend MPD Concept Plan Dear Lorenzo: Enclosed with this correspondence is a Zoning Atlas Amendment Application for The Clearwter Group, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, the owner of the approximate 35 acre parcel, commonly referred to as the Sunshine Mall Property. Pursuant to our discussions, this application requests approval of minor modifications to the approved zoning Concept Plan approved in conjunction with the Master Plan Development ("MPD") zoning for the property. year. The owner wishes to convert an approximate two acre area, that was previously approved for commercial uses, to multifamily use. The Applicant's engineering firm, Florida Design Consultants, Inc., already delivered to you, under separate cover, multiple copies of the proposed. Concept Plan. Enclosed also with this correspondence is a $250.00 check payable to the City of Clearwater for the zoning amendment filing fee. It is my understanding that this application will be heard by the City Commission on August 6, 1998. Please notify me if there is any change in this public hearing schedule. Finally, should or your staff require any additional information , please do not hesitate to call me. We look forward to working with the City in completing this application process. YArmstrong urs, III. EDA/dhm cc: Mr. Robert Hatfield Mr. Ed Mazur 0109230.04 CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 SUITE 1800 CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617-1368 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TELEPHONE: (813) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100 FACSIMILE (813) 441-8617 TELEPHONE (813) 225.2500 FACSIMILE (813) 223-7118 w DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE SUMMARY NOTES January 9, 1998 Meeting ITEM 1 Sunshine Mall Redevelopment Proposal James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, 1. Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid West vehicles. Enclosure of such size to store minimum six (6) 90 gallon recycling container per dumpster site. 2. Would recommend use of one or more trash compactors (roll-off type service) service available from City Solid Waste. 3. Applicant may wish to create a centralized solid waste facility. Mike Quillan, Environmental Engineer: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Missouri Avenue driveways are subject to City Engineer approval and to meet, at a minimum, FDOT standards for driveway spacing for the appropriate FDOT road category, but not to exceed the existing number of driveways. 2. Main entrance to a new median opening and the adjacent access/medians upgraded as required for the appropriate FDOT road category. 3. On-site traffic flow and parking to be adjusted as required by City staff, including proximity of parking spaces to living units. 4. On site traffic flow to provide cross-parcel access to minimize the number of driveways, including relocating the parcel 4, 4A & 5 accesses back from Missouri Avenue. 5. On-site turning radii must be adjusted to accommodate fire and solid waste vehicular traffic (45' min.). 6. Demonstrate that the proposed buffers on the Vision Works and Stadium parcels will not result in non-conforming parking dimensions. 7. Buffer landscaping to include 3" diameter trees, 24" height shrubs and central irrigation. 8. Provide stormwater calculations, including proposed off-site drainage improvements. 9. Cross-access agreements required. Lou Hilton, Senior Planner: 1. Designate walled areas with proposed height. 2. Internal circulation points of access, cross-access. 3. Landscape plan. 4. Better utilization of land in parcel 7, too many linear green areas - PSTA Shelter. 5. Lighting plan. 6. Traffic circulation plan. 7. Show traffic lights and pedestrian crossings. 8. Suggest improved individual lot/unit parking designations. a ? 9. Improved building orientation in parcel 6. 10. Show all gates - enlarged. 11. Handicapped parking. 12. Total plan refinement of plan - detail including, recreation areas. 13. Commercial parcels vs. Residential - lighting buffing, etc. Bob Perkins, Engineer II - no comment Steve Doherty, Central Permitting Supervisor: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Location and screen of all refuse containers /compactors. 2. Zoning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. 3. Identify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. 4. Submit a completed Concurrancy Review application for review with required fee. 5. Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address. 6. Legally record a Unity of Title for the project site and furnish proof of such action. 7. Show the date(s) and conditions(s) for approval of. (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning and Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or (b) a variance from the Flood Board for construction with 18 feet of a seawall. 8. Identify parcels with lot numbers. Lot widths do not meet lot width requirements. Not enough rear setback for separation between residential and commercial. 9. Some proposed uses not appropriate so close to residential, especially elderly dwellings. For elderly dwelling need to show more pedestrian element and public transportation. Prior to recording the preliminary plat, 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded. 2. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements. 3. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimensions and area of: Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose. Show the follow on the preliminary plat supplementary drawing, 1. Title of the associated preliminary plat. Other comments: 1. Each phase of project is subject to certified site plan review. Mike Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Show all pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan. 2. Adjust parking stalls and/or driveways on the plan to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. 3. Indicate the location of lighting fixtures in the parking areas on the site plan. 4. Show all on-site lighting with 90-degree cutoffs directed away from abutting streets right-of-way and residential properties. 5. Obtain a Significant Change of Use Determination from the FDOT per Florida § 335. 6. Execute an access easement between the sites after review and approval of the easement by the appropriate City staff. 7. Address and resolve the need for right turn/left turn auxiliary lanes and the queuing for traffic related to the project. 8. Label all public streets along Missouri Avenue. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic Engineering Office. 2. Pass parking lot inspection. George Fatolitis, Assistant Fire Marshall: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. 2. Locate on the plan minimum 20 ft. wide (a) Fire Lane(s) on the N , E S _, W _, side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 ft. 3. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. 4. Locate a fire hydrant assembly on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure. 5. Lock box for gate (F.D. access). 6. If more than three (3) stories, will need to be sprinkled. 7. 14' clearance over driveways. S/DRCSUNSH NEMALL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE SUMMARY NOTES January 9, 1998 Meeting ITEM 1 Sunshine Mall Redevelopment Proposal James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, 1. Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid West vehicles. Enclosure of such size to store minimum six (6) 90 gallon recycling containeOper dumpster site. 2. Would recommend use of one or more trash compactors (roll-off type service) service available from City Solid Waste. 3. Applicant may wish to create a centralized solid waste facility. Mike Quillan, Environmental En Environmental Engineer: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Missouri Avenue driveways are subject to City Engineer approval and to meet, at a minimum, FDOT standards for driveway spacing for the appropriate FDOT road category, but not to exceed the existing number of driveways. 2. Main entrance to a new median opening and the adjacent access/medians upgraded as required for the appropriate FDOT road category. 3. On-site traffic flow and parking to be adjusted as required by City staff, including proximity of parking spaces to living units. 4. On site traffic flow to provide cross-parcel access to minimize the number of driveways, including relocating the parcel 4, 4A & 5 accesses back from Missouri Avenue. 5. On-site turning radii must be adjusted to accommodate fire and solid waste vehicular traffic (45' min.). 6. Demonstrate that the proposed buffers on the Vision Works and Stadium parcels will not result in non-conforming parking dimensions. 7. Buffer landscaping to include 3" diameter trees, 24" height shrubs and central irrigation. 8. Provide stormwater calculations, including proposed off-site drainage improvements. 9. Cross-access agreements required. Lou Hilton, Senior Planner: 1. Designate walled areas with proposed height. 2. Internal circulation points of access, cross-access. 3. Landscape plan. 4. Better utilization of land in parcel 7, too many linear green areas - PSTA Shelter. 5. Lighting plan. 6. Traffic circulation plan. 7. Show traffic lights and pedestrian crossings. 8. Suggest improved individual lot/unit parking designations. r i 9. Improved building orientation in parcel 6. 10. Show all gates - enlarged. 11. Handicapped parking. 12. Total plan refinement of plan - detail including, recreation areas. 13. Commercial parcels vs. Residential - lighting buffing, etc. Bob Perkins, Engineer II - no comment Steve DoheM Central Permitting Supervisor. Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Location and screen of all refuse containers /compactors. 2. Zoning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. 3. Identify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. 4. Submit a completed Concurrancy Review application for review with required fee. x 5. Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address. 6. Legally record a Unity of Title for the project site and furnish proof of such action. 7. Show the date(s) and conditions(s) for approval of (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning and Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or (b) a variance from the Flood Board for construction with 18 feet of a seawall. 8. Identify parcels with lot numbers. Lot widths do not meet lot width requirements. Not enough rear setback for separation between residential and commercial. 9. Some proposed uses not appropriate so close to residential, especially elderly dwellings. For elderly dwelling need to show more pedestrian element and public transportation. Prior to recording the preliminary plat, 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded. 2. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements. 3. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimensions and area of: Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose. Show the follow on the preliminary plat supplementary drawing, 1. Title of the associated preliminary plat. Other comments: 1. Each phase of project is subject to certified site plan review. Mike Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Show all pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan. 2. Adjust parking stalls and/or driveways on the plan to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. 3. Indicate the location of lighting fixtures in the parking areas on the site plan. 4. Show all on-site lighting with 90-degree cutoffs directed away from abutting streets right-of-way and residential properties. 5. Obtain a Significant Change of Use Determination from the FDOT per Florida § 335. 6. Execute an access easement between the sites after review and approval of the easement by the appropriate City staff. 7. Address and resolve the need for right turn/left turn auxiliary lanes and the queuing for traffic related to the project. 8. Label all public streets along Missouri Avenue. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic Engineering Office. 2. Pass parking lot inspection. George Fatolitis, Assistant Fire Marshall: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. 2. Locate on the plan minimum 20 ft. wide (a) Fire Lane(s) on the N . E S . W . side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 ft. 3. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. 4. Locate a fire hydrant assembly on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure. 5. Lock box for gate (F.D. access). 6. If more than three (3) stories, will need to be sprinkled. 7. 14' clearance over driveways. S/DRCSUNSHINEMALL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department January 8, 1998 at 9:30 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for Sunshine Mall Redevelopment Proposal (PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT) DISCUSSION ONLY-PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED AT MEETING Reviewed by Department name: Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCCOA MENTS010898 14 4-- J A. Before the SITE PLAN can be certified, the applicant must complete the following action(s)checked below: ZONING 1. Show the following on the site plan: ll Legal description of the property. d Site area (square feet and acres). dNumber of dwelling units and hotel units proposed and the resulting net density.. L7? Floor area devoted to each category of use. door area ratio. Property owner's name, address and telephone number and the designated project representative name, address and telephone number. (and fax numbers). p Perimeter landscape buffer y?P king formula calculation for each use. cations of all driveways, parking areas and curb cuts. Delineation in mapped form and computation of the area of the sited devoted to building ?v coverage, open space for the lot, open space for the front yard and building coverage expressed in sq. ft. and as a percentage of the overall site. -03 cation and screening of all refuse containers /compactors. orth arrow. oning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. ? dentify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. ?2. Identify changes to the site data table if this is a plan amendment. ?3 Submit a completed CONCURRANCY REVIEW application for review with required fee .Show all contiguous streets & roads. .Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address. o E! 6.Limit the site plan to one page. -a Legally record a Unity of Tide for the project site and furnish proof of such action. ? Show the date(s) and condition(s) for approval of: v (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning & Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or 14 (b) a variance from a Flood Bo rd for IIc11onstruction within 18 feet of a seawall . ?9. 0fer commefitsJ 1we 4 s L ?ty (o * I e% W t W ? 4A 5' .h ?.:, A"J t Ir *L J l 1 c r i 1, i feP 1f.M S _ Aia ibn i , a 1'&A, StMlk lrm? FIRE DEPARTMENT ?1. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. ?2. Locate on the plan minimum 20 Ft wide (a) FIRE LANE(S) on the N E_ S_ W side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 feet. ?3. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. ?4. Locate a FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure at _"It 1 VNIT 6 -- -- --- ---- 200 - r C, 4"r 10 C Pv t3 ?- ?c Tc2.?•.. z wQ..c T,or v..r ?' ccSS P.o, C-A ,-- st, '12.o,w, (ornooj) O IZ f ? ? ?- tZrS'!? ?c t+?v SPact'"S `??? ;?G?Zoss ?K`lC?ors /1cc,?5 < rt.! - I- 1. Cc.aRt v-t {.},['. r t-+c?tt.?a Tit,. cv?•?c- of vl4- s/M 1 ?-f Yew. N.s-Ga{r.CLUss--,--K6-...A??•.?voCc CONGJitytiJ_?'GE -_?t?/'?1l ??_ _ .. _Ttia?? IG. - .? vk IP1?? -- - -- - EX?St?JG.__ ?(4?'•.--y?!?-._-___??_?-.gJ???L-.._? ??IU??, LOrs ?'-C??J , ?.tiJacr?- oG..b ?? WpsL4Cd? v w cwc S 4w pc...? ro, Ica cat ?a?-r? .ce ---v"rej r p, Fog Go.-.?c?sT?rr..,? r ? S-t'c,.i?«C??'' f"l.?S?? acs.-.........?,a DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department January 8, 1998 at 9:30 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for Sunshine Mall Redevelopment Proposal (PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT) DISCUSSION ONLY-PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED AT MEETING Reviewed by. L G v I L v Department name: Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCCOMMENTS010898 vi va 3 c .8? a) A4--P? P oxzt;---? M-U4? s ?r Ot M Q February 03, 1998 z Ed Mazur, President 6 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 639 McCormick Drive Clearwater, FL 33759 RE: Preliminary Plat submission for Sunshine Mall property Dear Mr. Mazur: We have reviewed the preliminary plat submission which was submitted December 19, 1997 and the preliminary plat supplementary drawings which were submitted on January 28, 1998. Please revise these drawings as follows in order to meet all land development code submission requirements: Preliminary Plat a. Title, provide name of preliminary plat (Sunshine Mall Preliminary Plat). Preliminary Plat Supplementary Drawing: a. Title, provide name of preliminary plat to which supplemental drawing applies; (Sunshine Mall Preliminary Plat Supplementary Drawing), and b. Note: "sewer and water service to be provided by the City of Clearwater Please submit 20 copies of each of the revised plans to me on or prior to Friday, February 6, 1998, in order for the preliminary play to be received and referred by the City Commission at its meeting of March 5, 1998. The resultant scheduling of meetings for the Sunshine Mall property is as follows: Board/Committee Action Meeting date Planning and Zoning Board Review/referral of MPD proposal January 20, 1998 City Commission Review/1". reading MPD zoning February 5, 1998 City Commission Review/2" d. reading MPD zoning February 19, 1998 City Commission Review and referral of preliminary plat March 5, 1998 Development Review Committee Review of preliminary site plan /preliminary plat March 12, 1998 c) 8---a- 0 -?- ?? o D D G? p D? This schedule reflects city management's intent to present to the City Commission the non-technical aspects of this redevelopment proposal first followed by a review of the more technical issues. Please note that the Development Review Board date proposed has not changed. If you are in need of any further information at this time, please don't hesitate to call or write either me or Steve Doherty. Sincerely, Sandy Glatthorn Planning Administrator CC: Richard Harris Steve Doherty %c-,i--- =?'gTER,;? ?? CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT February 03, 1998 C ITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (813) 562-4567 Richard Harris, P.E. Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 639 McComvck Drive Clearwater, FL 33759 RE: Preliminary Plat submission for Sunshine Mall property Dear Mr. Harris: We have reviewed the preliminary plat submission which was submitted December 19, 1997 and the preliminary plat supplementary drawings which were submitted on January 28, 1998. Please revise these drawings as follows in order to meet all land development code submission requirements: Preliminary Plat: a. Title block, provide name of preliminary plat (Sunshine Mall Preliminary Plat). Preliminary Plat Supplementary Drawing a. Title block, provide name of preliminary plat to which supplemental drawing applies; (Sunshine Mall Preliminary Plat Supplementary Drawing), and b. Note: "sewer and water service to be provided by the City of Clearwater Please submit 20 copies of each of the revised plans to Steve Doherty on or prior to Friday, February 6, 1998, in order for the preliminary plat to be received and referred by the City Commission at its meeting of March 5, 1998. The schedule of meetings for the Sunshine Mall property is as follows: Board/Committee Action Meeting date Planning and Zoning Board Review/referral of MPD proposal January 20, 1998 City Commission Review/15C. reading MPD zoning February 5, 1998 City Commission Review/2.d. reading MPD zoning February 19, 1998 City Commission Review and referral of preliminary plat March 5, 1998 Development Review Committee Review of preliminary site plan/preliminary plat March 12, 1998 If you are in need of any further information please call or write either me or Steve Doherty. Sincerely, Sandy Gla om Planning Administrator "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Clearwater Central Permitting Department Interoffice Correspondence To: Tony Shoemaker, Interim Director Central Permitting Department From Steve Doherty, Central Permitting Supervisor Subject: Sunshine Mall Replat/Rezoning review dates REVISED CC: Sandy Glatthorn, Planning Administrator Etim Udoh, Associate Planner Date: December 22, 1997 I have revised the proposed meeting dates for the above referenced item below: Ed Mazur with King Engineering, the engineer for the project is requesting a special D.R.C. meeting one either January 14 or January 16 for a courtesy review. Please note this item was received one day past the December 17"' deadline for rezoning items. Nevertheless, according to Sandy Glatthorn this item is to stay on schedule for the January 20' Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Board/Committee Action Proposed date DRC Review of preliminary plat/preliminary site plan January 14 or 16, 1998 Courtesy review PZB Review/referral WD January 20, 1998 City Commission Review/1". reading February 05, 1998 DRC Review of preliminary plat/preliminary site plan February 12, 1998 Formal review City Commission Review/2"'. reading February 19, 1998 MEMOSunshineMall `SAL°° r#t e. rPW dTEa CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT January 6, 1998 C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (813) 562-4567 Clearwater Group Limited, a Florida Limited Partnership 2026 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 250 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 Attn.: Mr. Bob Hatfield Re: Sunshine Mall To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the City of Clearwater currently serves and has adequate natural gas, potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste collection capacity to serve proposed development at the Sunshine Mall located at 1200 Missouri Avenue, Clearwater. Water, sanitary sewer and gas service will be provided through existing mains located adjacent to the site upon payment of applicable fees. Also be advised thatI have confirmed with Steve Doherty in the Zoning Department that the current zoning for the subject parcel is CC (Commercial Center) and Multiple Family Residential 28 (RM-28). I can be reached at 562-4591 should you need any additional information. Sincerely, Bob Perkins Civil Engineer /bp cc: Steve Doherty, Zoning John Scott, Utility Customer Service Division Richard Harris, Florida Design Consultants (FA)Q Utility Letter for Sunshine 0 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Mar-10-98 01:03P FDOT 07 OPERATIONS 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 FLORIDA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION t^WM CHILES 7"OK 61 r. BAM A. SacagTAM OOO mull 07. MWMnnelACni Mr2aaM Y 1227 N. MdCWq6r. TspLFSl2 (XU) 9746262 • I-IM226.72M • Pax 975-4172 March 10, 1998 RobertC. Pergoll=, AICP Vice President/ Transportation Planning . Florida Design Consultants, Inc 2639 Me Cormack Drive Clearwater, Florida 33759 FL •;: Sunshine Mall- Determination of Significant Change SR 651( Missouri Avenue) Section: 15007 Dear Mr. Pergolizzi: In response to your request for a Determination of Significant Change as defined in Rule Chapter 14-97-002, we offer the following: 1. The proposed site uses as you have explained, will not constitute a "significant change" from the existing uses. Therefore, a new access connection permit is not required. 2. However, should the land uses change and traffic volumes increase significantly, you may need to obtain an FDOT Access Connection Permit. If you proposes construction in the State ROW you would also be required to obtain a permit. New do not hesitate to contact this office at (813) 975-6(155 if you should have additio questions. --- - Sincerely, Wsuh A. S mith s Management Development Coordinator C.%PERkjmll1j1jro1:smut o1 03-10-1998 01:14PM 813 975 6278 5716278 P.01 LL. Clearwater To: Bob Perkins, Engineer Ii; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering;. Zoning Review (Earl);: Certified Site:Plan-File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable , please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRMNALSUNSHINEMALL L.L Clrwater Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director,-Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning-Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable , please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRUINALSUNSHINEMALL Clearwater Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer 11; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer 111; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. MCFINALSUNSHINEMALL -? u/6 O, 1(? - Ci -7-7? / _ < ?V j ? r 77 (,w ?T7 w> L?w -r-c- WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Previous Document Next D t First Hit Native Wi W d View I Back to R l New Help ocumen n or mage esu ts ue PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF CLEARWATER January 20, 1998 Present: Douglas Hilkert Chair Gerald Figurski Vice Chair Edward Mazur Board Member Robert D. Bickerstaffe Board Member Brenda Harris Nixon Board Member Frank Kunnen Board Member Vacant Seat Board Member Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Sandy Glatthorn Planning Manager Gwen Legters Board Reporter The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. in City Hall, followed by the Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance, meeting procedures and the appeal process. To provide continuity for research, items are listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. Minutes Approval January",6, 19`98 This item was continued to allow members time to receive and review the minutes. B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items http:// 199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD a Page 2 of 7 B 1. (Cont. from 1/6/98) (2nd request for extension) Lima Lake, Inc. ( Yacht Basin Apartments) to permit marina (20 slips) at 501 Mandalay Ave., Yacht Basin Sub, Lots 1-9, zoned RM 24 (Multi Family Residential) and P (Preservation). CU 97-09 Andrew Nicholson, engineer representing the applicant, requested a time extension due to delays processing state and county permits. Staff recommended a one year extension. No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed. Member Mazur moved to approve a one year time extension to February 4, 1999, subject to the original four conditions, with an amendment to #1, as follows: 1) The applicant shall obtain the requisite building permit, certificate of occupancy and occupational license within six months one year from the date of this public hearing; 2) All site lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining residential properties and street rights-of-way prior to issuance of the requisite occupational license; 3) All boat slips shall be for the exclusive use of Yacht Basin Apartments tenants only; and 4) No boat slip rental or other commercial activity shall be permitted in the marina. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. C. Conditional Uses C 1. Wellford Corporation (Munchees, Inc.) to permit package sales of beer and wine (change of business ownership) at 1801 Sunset Point Road, Pinellas Groves (SW '/a), part of Lot 8, zoned CN (Neighborhood Commercial). CU 98-03 Ms. Glatthorn presented written background, staff recommendations, zoning, and proposed hours of operation. As the request appears compatible with surrounding uses, staff recommended approval with two conditions. Applicant Mah'd A. Msawel restated his request for beer and wine package sales. In response to questions, he said the business is located next door to Queen's Pizza, and he does sell gasoline. No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed. One member expressed his standing objection to alcoholic beverage sales where gasoline is sold. Member Figurski moved to approve Item C1, CU 98-03, subject to the following conditions: 1) The requisite certificate of occupancy and occupational license shall be obtained within 1 year of the public hearing date, and 2) The hours of operation shall be limited to 5 a.m. until 11 p. m., Monday through Sunday. Members Hilkert, Figurski, Bickerstaffe, Nixon, and Kunnen voted "Aye;" Member Mazur voted "Nay." Motion carried. C2. Woodlawn Church of God to permit child day care at 845 Woodlawn St., Belmont 2nd Addition, Blk C, Lots 1-10 & 45-52, zoned P/SP (Public/Semi Public). CU 98-04 Ms. Glatthorn presented background information and written staff recommendations, stating an existing church is requesting a conditional use to allow day care in an existing structure as an accessory church use. Adequate vehicle drop-off and playground areas exist on the property. As the request appears to be compatible with surrounding uses, staff recommended approval with two conditions. Pastor Randy Morris stated the church has the necessary facilities for the proposed preschool. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Page 3 of 7 Originally licensed for 15 children, he estimated the occupancy will grow to 63. In addition to providing an economic benefit to working families, the preschool is important to minister to their physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual needs. He related church expansion history since the mid- 1950's. He has been pastor for 13 years and will continue seeking to be a service, not a detriment to the neighborhood. Pastor Morris responded to questions regarding the hours and number of church services each week, how he plans to address the peace and quiet issue, landscaping, fencing, configuration of the property to shield the children, noise buffering, playground supervision ratios and traffic impact. It was indicated traffic flow will be evaluated to determine whether the proposal will have any net traffic impact. Discussion ensued regarding ownership, occupancy, and use of surrounding properties. Discussion continued regarding timing and duration of outdoor activities. Pastor Morris pointed out both lots on the south side of the playground area are owned and used by the church. He stressed he does not want to jeopardize his good relationship with the neighbors and did not feel the proposal will do that. No verbal or written support was expressed. Three nearby residents and one interested citizen spoke in opposition to the request, citing concerns regarding severe parking problems, exposing children to existing adverse neighborhood conditions, presence of other day care facilities in the vicinity, traffic speed and congestion on the busy neighborhood streets, insufficient notice of public hearing, lack of cooperation and communication with neighbors regarding church construction and dirt blowing from the church parking lot into a neighbor's pool and home, the number of requests the City has approved for church rezoning and expansion, and a flyer advertising the church is accepting preschool registration applications before receiving conditional use approval. Church pursuit of an offsite parking lot was encouraged. One phone call and one letter with a total of four signatures were received in opposition to the request. Pastor Morris stated he has devoted his life to doing the right thing. He was surprised to opposition from two of today's speakers who had indicated to him they did not oppose the request. He said the preschool registration was subject to county approval. He has always raised the banner of neighborhood cooperation. He has been trying to correct the dusty parking lot issue. He did not realize work on a recent minor renovation, done by one church member and a helper, needed to be discussed with neighbors. He agreed parking is a problem. Signs have been posted restricting parking to one side of the street and four parking ushers direct traffic. People do not seem to want to park in the remote spaces. He did not feel weekday child care traffic can be compared to Sunday morning. He responded to questions regarding day care traffic ingress and egress. As some families will have more than one child in preschool, and some will walk to the facility, he did not feel it was likely to have more than 50 cars per day, arriving over a two hour time span. A question was raised whether the pastor would agree to limiting the operation to 15 or 20 children at first. Pastor Morris responded child care is a serious financial drain on church resources. Capping enrollment at 15 students would not allow the preschool to sustain itself and pay its bills. Allowing for natural growth to the maximum 63 students would enable the facility to pay for itself eventually. He expects the congregation to double in the future. One member observed the church will need to make arrangements for more land when that happens. Pastor Morris responded to questions regarding total church membership, normal Sunday attendance, number of vehicles involved, and total number of existing parking spaces. In response to questions, Ms. Glatthorn said additional parking is not required for the proposal. As the day care is conducted in existing buildings, it is considered an accessory use. The church has met all requirements, or obtained variances. Staffs opinion regarding impact on http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/HRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD surrounding streets was that City Traffic Engineering had no comment. Page 4 of 7 Board members expressed the following concerns: 1) churches are normally quiet, but problems arise when they grow to the point they are no longer compatible with residential neighborhoods; 2) day care facilities are not compatible with residential neighborhoods because their noise can be heard from great distances; 3) fewer students would be preferable because adding 63 students would have significant impacts; and 4) traffic impacts are difficult to determine without a study. Some members praised churches as quiet, welcome additions to neighborhoods. Occasional traffic and noise are parts of community life. No evidence was submitted that 60 cars arriving at one time would have a major impact. Member Nixon moved to deny Item C2, CU 98-04. There was no second. Discussion ensued regarding whether, in the absence of substantial competent evidence from neighbors opposing an application, board members should base their decisions on staffs professional recommendation, or whether members should use common sense to decide if a proposal is good for the community based on board experience, observation, code familiarity, and neighbors' testimony. Member Figurski moved to approve Item C2, CU 98-04, subject to the following conditions: 1) A permit for the fence around the playground shall be obtained within 6 months of the date of this public hearing; and 2) Landscaping shall be maintained along the south side of the play area to buffer the nearby residential uses. Member Bickerstaffe moved to amend the motion, adding a condition requiring a six-month trial period review. There was no second. Member Kunnen moved to amend the motion, adding a condition restricting the applicant to 20 students initially. There was no second. Upon the vote being taken, Members Hilkert, Figurski, Mazur, and Kunnen voted "Aye;" Members Bickerstaffe and Nixon voted "Nay." Motion carried. C3. Security Capital Industrial Ltd Partnership III to permit manufacturing at 704 Laura St., Gould & Ewing's 2nd Addition, Blk 15, Lots 12 & 13, zoned UC[C] (Urban Center Core). CU 98-05 Ms. Glatthorn presented written background information, staff recommendations, parking and signage requirements. The applicant proposes to establish a custom, "one of a kind" furniture manufacturing business, employing a maximum of four people. As the request appears to be compatible with surrounding uses, staff recommended approval with two conditions. Applicant Linda Vanderwende stated every piece of furniture is custom designed by computer and autocad, and fabricated on site. No toxic materials and no retail sales are involved. She did not understand the need for a building permit to dismantle partitions in an existing building. Brief discussion ensued regarding building and signage permit requirements. It was indicated signage may be subject to Design Review Board consideration if the property is within the applicable section of downtown. No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Page 5 of 7 Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item C3, CU 98-05, subject to the following conditions: 1) The requisite building permit within six months of the date of this public hearing; and 2) The requisite certificate of occupancy and occupational license shall be obtained within one year of the date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. Annexation, Zoning, Land Use Plan Amendment, Land Development Code Text Amendment, and Local Planning Agency Review D 1. Ordinance 6231-98 An ordinance of the City of Clearwater, Florida, amending the Zoning Atlas of the City by rezoning certain property located on the south corner of Druid Road and west of 40 Missouri W Avenue, approximately 640 feet north of Lakeview Road, and east of Greenwood Avenue, consisting of Section 15-29-15, M&B 34.01 and Section 22-29-15, M& B 21.01 and 21.02, whose post office address is 1200 W South 4 Missouri W Avenue, from Commercial Center (CC and Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty Eight" ( RM-28) To Master Planned Development (MPD); providing an effective date. Member Mazur declared a conflict of interest with regard to this item. Ms. Glatthorn presented background information and zoning requirements for the proposal to redevelop the Sunshine Mall property with apartment buildings, commercial, and residential uses. In response to questions, she said the City Clerk Department felt it was necessary to present the ordinance in this manner for advertising purposes. The proposed rezoning to Master Planned Development will involve no land use plan amendment. It will provide an alternative method of land development to accommodate a comprehensively planned and phased development project. She reviewed concept plan requirements, apartment building layout, perimeter landscaping, driveway access, and infrastructure improvements for the 35.4 acre site. She detailed site plan certification requirements, density, floor area ratios, traffic impact issues, drainage needs, and consistency with surroundings. As the request appears to support standards for approval, staff recommended endorsement. Assistant City Manager Rick Hedrick expressed the City's support and excitement regarding the positive potential of this general concept plan for luxury apartments and elderly housing. City staff has met with developer's representatives to ensure the buildings, construction materials, and site configuration present a high quality, aesthetic appearance to be a true community asset. This type of project is in line with City Manager Roberto's goal of "raising the bar" with respect to development quality. Board members were happy to hear the City administration's endorsement. Discussion ensued regarding the need for a dense perimeter landscaping buffer between residential and commercial areas, architectural appearance, and good construction methods. It was emphasized both projects will be retained, owned and managed by the developers. Ed Armstrong, attorney representing the applicants, listed existing commercial businesses that will remain along Missouri Avenue. He said the proposed density is about half the maximum allowed by code. Developers will adhere to the more stringent landscaping requirements proposed in the new Land Development Code, and will go beyond code to ensure board and staff are comfortable with the project's quality. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Page 6 of 7 Scott Culp, representing CED Construction, Orlando, proposed developer of the elderly housing component, highlighted the company's experience, reputation, and history of remaining to manage the properties they build. He displayed two color renderings of the site and front elevation, stating he will follow up on staffs comments to ensure perimeter landscaping is more than adequate to buffer the adjacent residential properties to the west. The developer creates gated communities with restricted access and TV monitoring to give elderly residents a sense of privacy. Referring to aesthetics depicted in the elevation study, he said 408 residential units are proposed to be developed over five years. Each residence will be a full-sized dwelling unit containing from one to three bedrooms, a full kitchen, access from common interior corridors, and luxury amenities in the common areas. In response to questions, Mr. Culp said the elderly component is for residents 62 years and older. All units are for rental; none will be sold. A price range study has not been done, but the rate will be less than for assisted living facilities. Neither meals nor a common dining room are provided as the community is strictly for independent apartment living. Discussion ensued regarding site plan details, proposed building heights, detention, and interior site landscaping to be shown on the final plan. Richard Harris, engineer with Florida Design Consultants, representing International Realty, Inc., San Antonio, stated he is designing the luxury apartment project on the 8.33 acre parcel #6. Typically two or three stories, the buildings are Mediterranean architectural style. In response to questions, he said the units will have hydronic water heating, a monitoring system to measure how much water each unit uses and what it costs. He said the City Manager shared the board's concern that it is not clear on the plan where green space and parking are planned. The applicants must come back with a detailed landscaping plan, showing in great detail what is proposed to separate commercial from residential properties. Discussion ensued regarding the remaining commercial uses on the outparcels, floor area ratio, landscaping, density, parcel ownership, maximum building heights, traffic circulation and stacking distance at gated entrances to avoid traffic backing up into the street. No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed. Member Kunnen moved to endorse Item D1, Ordinance 6231-98 to the City Commission. Members Hilkert, Figurski, Bickerstaffe, Nixon, and Kunnen, voted "Aye;" Member Mazur abstained. Board and Staff Comments Chair Hilkert stated Rick Anderson has been appointed to the Planning and Zoning Board vacancy and will attend the February 17 meeting as the February 3 meeting was canceled. Mr. Hilkert requested staff to contact Mr. Anderson regarding the need to take the oath of office prior to the meeting. He requested City Clerk Department staff to administer the oath in Chambers before the meeting is called to order. Mr. Hilkert recognized Boy Scout Pack 455 in the audience, accompanied by Mayor Garvey. He invited each scout to introduce himself to the viewing audience. Mr. Hilkert raised a question for discussion during review of the board's rules. He felt the time frame for reconsiderations should be extended to the next regular meeting. He realized upon viewing a replay of the recent Carlisle case that he had not included the agreed-upon time frame for construction of the fence when restating the motion. Under the current rules, reconsideration of that condition cannot occur without readvertising and rehearing the case. Discussion ensued comparing Planning and Zoning Board rules to Robert's Rules of Order. It was indicated the board may change the minutes by http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 ?WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Page 7 of 7 majority vote. Staff was asked to research the tape to determine whether how the final motion was stated. In response to a question from Member Nixon, Ms. Glatthorn said interim Director Tony Shoemaker had decided a Central Permitting/ Planning and Zoning Board workshop was not needed. Another workshop can be scheduled, if needed. Member Mazur expressed concern regarding conduct of meetings when cross examination occurs. Secondly, he questioned whether the board must rule solely on testimony presented during the hearing, in order to be appeal-proof, or whether board members may form their decisions based upon personal knowledge, common sense, and personal judgment in interpreting whether or not an application is appropriate for a neighborhood. He did not cast his vote based on incompatibility of today's preschool request because witnesses did not bring it up during the public portion of the meeting. If the situation had been reversed, he might have voted against the day care and the request would have been denied. Ms. Dougall-Sides responded board members are not required to leave their common sense outside the room during public hearings. Member Nixon commented compatibility issues are within the board's purview, according to code. She stressed the board exists to protect citizens from impacts of which the public may not be aware. Member Kunnen questioned whether staffs professional recommendation should prevail when an issue does not appear to have been addressed. He observed a "no comment" from the Traffic Engineer does not mean the issue was studied. Member Hilkert stated members are not obligated to explain their positions. In the above referenced day care case, he understood Member Figurski was explaining why he was making the motion. Mr. Hilkert usually favors development, but public opinion is a valid consideration that sometimes pushes the pendulum toward the negative. Member Bickerstaffe stated it is important to understand that for applicants can address neighbors concerns without having their applications denied. That was his reason for recommending a trial period. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:43 p.m. mpz01b98 6 01/20/98 Ask me about ISYS http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/2/doc 06/22/2000 MEETING Previous Document Next Doc me t First Hit Native Wi W d View I Back to R l 2 ?:] u n n or mage esu ts CITY COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER February 5, 1998 Present: J. B. Johnson Vice-Mayor/Commissioner Robert Clark Commissioner Ed Hooper Commissioner Karen Seel Commissioner Michael J. Roberto City Manager Kathy S. Rice Deputy City Manager Bob Keller Assistant City Manager Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Brenda Moses Board Reporter Absent: Rita Garvey Mayor/Commissioner The Vice-Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The invocation was offered by Reverend Otis Green of Everybody's Tabernacle. The Vice-Mayor led the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. ITEM #3 - Service Awards - None. ITEM #4 - Introduction and Awards http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 2 of 10 Proclamations: Burn Awareness Week - February 8-14, 1998 ITEM #5 - Presentations - None. ITEM #6 - Approval of Minutes Commissioner Clark moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 15, 1998, as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Commissioner. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #7 - Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda Astrid Conyers Almstead & Kathy Conyers Cohee, children of a motorcycle officer killed in the line of duty, expressed concerns regarding returning motorcycles to the police force. They indicated motorcycles had previously been taken off the police force due to high numbers of casualties. Ralph Spencer thanked the City Commission for their hard work. He expressed appreciation to Mayor Garvey regarding her efforts to promote goodwill in Nagano, Japan. He said he disagreed with the Eller Media settlement unless all billboards are removed in accordance with the City's sign ordinance. He requested reconsideration of the January 15, 1998, settlement approval. He said his neighborhood is partially zoned multi- family. The Morningside Meadows Homeowners Association discussed this matter last night, and Mr. Spencer said he anticipates the City Commission will receive additional correspondence from homeowners on this topic. Gary Benjamin, Chairman of the Clearwater AA (Airport Authority Board ), the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) will likely participate with the City in several safety projects at the Airpark. As a result, the City will save $227,000 in the capital budget over the next two years. FAA funding will not involve operational requirements and restrictions. He expressed concern that AA meetings are no longer being televised and requested this be reconsidered. John Tassanari said he felt the City Manager has a lot to learn about Clearwater. He said he felt the City does not care about the average taxpayer. He said there is a problem in reaching the police department. He also opposed a playground on the beach. He said the City's needs would be better served by making a decision on the bridge. He said a resident gave a bottle of champagne to the Mayor at a public meeting and asked if an enticement law exists in Clearwater. City Attorney Pam Akin said there is no law stating a resident cannot give a gift of champagne. Roy Cadwell expressed concern regarding increased Solid Waste rates and suggested the City reduce collection frequencies. PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM #8 - Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property located at 26990 US19N, Sec. 30-28-16, M&B 31.03, 31.04 & part of 31.02 (University High Equity Real Estate Fund II, Jean F. Shelling, Trustee and TM Clearwater Realty Limited Partnership / Lowe's, SV98-03) The property proposed by Lowe's for redevelopment is bounded on the east-and west by US 19 North and Enterprise Road, respectively, and is approximately 0.1 mile south of S. R. 580 in the Commercial http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 3 of 10 Center zoning district. The applicant is requesting a variance of 327 square feet to allow 477 square feet of attached sign area oriented toward US 19 North where a maximum of 150 square feet is permitted. Three signs are proposed on the east side of the store: 1) "Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse"; 2) " Indoor Lumber Yard"; and 3) "Garden Center" Staff does not support the request but can support a lesser variance of 187.5 square feet due to the size of the property, and the structure's distance from the street right- of-way. Approval of a 187.5 square foot variance would allow 337.5 square feet of attached sign. Ed Armstrong, representing the applicant, felt the applicant has gone above and beyond Code requirements for landscaping and other issues. He concurred with staffs recommendation for a lesser variance. Commissioner Seel moved to approve a variance of 187.5 square feet to allow 337.5 square feet of attached sign area oriented toward U.S. 19N. on property identified as Sec. 30-28-16, M&B's 31.03, 31.04 and part of 31.02, for meting Sec. 45.24 Standards for Approval, items (1)-(4). The motion was duly seconded. In response to a question, John Richter, Senior Planner, said the applicant can determine the distribution of the square footage among the three signs. Upon the vote being taken, it carried unanimously. ITEM #9 - Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6231-98 - Rezoning to WD for property (Sunshine Mall) located on S corner of Druid Rd., W of Missouri Ave., approx. 640'N of Lakeview Rd., and E of Greenwood Ave., Sec. 15-29-15, M&B 34.01 and Sec. 22-29-15, M&B 21.01 & 21.02; approve concept plan & refer final site plan to DRC for approval & certification (Mary Taylor Hancock; Jean Taylor Carter & John S. Taylor III, Z98-02) The applicants are requesting a zoning change for the Sunshine Mall property, at 4N 1200 W South 4 Missouri W Avenue on the southwest corner of the Druid Road and 4 Missouri W K> Avenue, north of Lakeview Road and east of Greenwood Avenue. They propose to rezone the property and to replat it into apartment units and commercial uses. Parcels 1 - 5C will be used for commercial uses and Parcels 6 and 7 for residential uses. The rezoning will permit 608 apartment units if rezoned MPD (Master Planned development District.) The property is presently zoned CC (Commercial Center) and RM- 28 (Multiple Family Residential "Twenty-Eight") with compatible land use plan classifications of Commercial General and Residential High respectively. No land use plan amendment will be involved in the rezoning request. All land assigned the proposed zoning district requires a concept plan be approved by the City Commission. It includes the conceptual layout for apartment buildings, perimeter landscaping buffers for the entire site, and the existing driveways for access. The total land area for the site is 35.4 acres. Twenty-five acres or more are required to establish a new MPD district. This site exceeds 25 acres in area requiring review and approval by the City Commission of the associated site plan simultaneously with this request. The proposed development will involve substantial improvements at the site including water, sewer, drainage facilities, roads, and parking facilities to be installed to City standards and in a manner consistent with the approved final site plan. The proposed development will be consistent with an approved site plan that has not been submitted for certification, and that will be required to include: 1) a landscaping plan; 2) a lighting plan; 3) a solid waste system; 4) a parking layout relative to the proposed development; 5) a traffic circulation plan; and 6) internal circulation points of access and cross-access. Density requirements will be met at the permitted density of 24 units per acre. Parcel #7 will be used for construction of 408 elderly apartment units. Parcel #6 will be used for construction of 200 general apartment units. The commercial facilities will be on the east side http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 4 of 10 of the subject properties. Staff is working with the applicants to prepare a traffic impact study to determine peak hour levels of service in accordance with the concurrence management program and potential roadway improvements. Staff is reviewing landscape concepts and existing drainage issues. The rezoning request is consistent with the surrounding land use patterns and in character with the neighborhood. The project will contribute positively to redevelopment of the area. Ed Armstrong, representing the applicant, said the project is comprised of 1) 9 acres of commercial frontage along Missouri Avenue; 2) 408 elderly housing units under contract with CED Construction Company; and 3) 200 unrestricted apartments at the southern portion of the site. He said the applicants are requesting a reduction of 200,000 commercial square feet. Scott Culp, Director of Development for CED Construction, said his company has developed multifamily communities for more than 35 years. The company currently owns and operates 72 communities with more than 15,000 apartment homes. Developments are not sold once developed. The proposed community will include more landscaping and buffers than required. The development will be gated with a main entrance through the retail portion of the property. Common amenities will be included in each phase. Resident views will be oriented inward and away from the street. As the project is contingent upon approval of State tax credits, it was questioned what would happen should the tax credits be denied. Mr. Armstrong said the developer/owner would be required to rezone only the portion involving CED Construction Company. In response to a question, Mr. Culp said the tax credit process is competitive. CED President Mike Sharino said this year the State has given priority to elder housing projects in certain census tracts, and this is one of them. He felt the project will experience a high degree of success. Concern was expressed regarding age restrictions. Mr. Culp said no final determination has been made whether the restrictions will be between the ages of 55 and over, or 62 and over. The Federal Tax Credit Program includes restrictions on income levels and rents. In response to question, Mr. Armstrong felt if the CED is unable to go forward, developing the property will be easier with the zoning change. The project will not move forward until the City Commission approves the site plans. The number of units cannot be changed without City Commission approval. Anthony Everett, of International Realty, said his firm has a contract to develop 200 residential unrestricted apartments on this property. The units will range in size from 516 to 1,100 square feet. The community will have a dedicated entrance and controlled access. Pat Norman, a Sunshine Terrace resident, expressed her concern regarding the City's ability to accommodate the increased water, sewage, garbage and drainage issues involved with such a project. Public Works Administrator Rich Baier said the City is working with the applicant to address all pertinent issues. Commissioner Hooper moved to approve the Petition for rezoning to MPD for property (Sunshine Mall) on south Corner of Druid., west of Missouri Avenue, approximately 640' north of Lakeview Road., and east of Greenwood Avenue., Sec. 15-29-15, M&B 34.01 and Sec. 22 29-15, M&B 21.01 & 21.01; approve concept plan & refer final site plan to DRC for approval and certification. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The City Attorney presented Ordinance 96231-98 for first reading and read it by title only. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/lRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 • WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 5 of 10 Commissioner Seel moved to pass Ordinance #6231-98 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, and Seel. "Nayes" : None. Absent: Garvey Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances ITEM #10 - Ord. #6218-98 - Relating to utilities; amending Secs. 32.062, 32.066, 32.070, 32.071, 32.072, and Appendix A, Art. XXIV Utilities - General and Deposits, and Appendix A, Art. XXV Public Works - Fees, Rates and Charges The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6218-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6218-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes": None. Absent: Garvey ITEM #11 - Ord. #6222-98 - Annexation for property located at 1573 Owen Dr., Orange Blossom Sub., Lot 7 (Kim Wayne Biser, A97-13) The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6222-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6222-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes": None. Absent: Garvey ITEM #12 - Ord. #6223-98 - RS-4 Zoning for property located at 1573 Owen Dr., Orange Blossom Sub., Lot 7 (Kim Wayne Biser, A97-13) The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6223-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6223-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes" : None. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doe 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 6 of 10 Absent: Garvey ITEM #13 - Ord. #6224-98 - Annexation for property located at 1934 Atlantis Dr., Sunset Point Estates, Blk A, Lot 27 (Charlene Boatwright, Hubert & Mildred James, A97-14) The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6224-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Seel moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6224-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes": None. Absent: Garvey ITEM #14 - Ord. #6225-98 - RS-8 Zoning for property located at 1934 Atlantis Dr., Sunset Point Estates, Blk A, Lot 27 (Charlene Boatwright, Hubert & Mildred James, A97-14) The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6225-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6225-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes" : None. Absent: Garvey ITEM #15 - Ord. #6226-98 - Annexation for property located at 181 Pinewood Ave., Eastwood Terrace 1st Add., Blk D, Lot 2 (Alfonso Tundidor, A98-01) The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6226-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6226-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes": None. Absent: Garvey ITEM #16 - Ord. #6227-98 - RS-6 Zoning for property located at 181 Pinewood Ave., Eastwood Terrace 1 st Add., Blk D, Lot 2 (Alfonso Tundidor, A98-01) The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6227-98 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Seel moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6227-98 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Naves": None. Absent: Garvey CITY MANAGER REPORTS ITEM #17 - Approval of Purchases & Declaration of Surplus per 01/15/98 memorandum: - Page 7 of 10 Bridges Equipment Co., Inc., three 1998 Kubota agricultural tractors, $74, 653.14; funding to be provided under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement ($68,953.14) and current fiscal year operating savings from Parks and Recreation/Parks for vehicle upgrades ($5,700)(GS) Xerox Corp., extension, maintenance of City's Xerox 5090 high speed copier, 01/30/98-02/01/99, estimated $27,780 (IM) West Coast Plumbing and Gas, Inc., gas meter change out and loop rebuilding, date of award through 02/28/99, estimated $42,000 (GAS) Van Waters and Rogers, extension, chlorine in one ton cylinders and in 150 pound cylinders, award date through 02/03/99, estimated $137,505.38 (FN) Declare surplus to City needs, one 1983 Dodge pickup truck, G-272, with 87, 241 miles; authorize disposal to highest bidder (FN) ITEM #18 - 1998 Underdrain Contract, Overstreet Paving Company, $731,617. 70 (PW) In regard to Item #18, Mr. Baier said retainage is withheld until all specifications in the contract are met. Commissioner Seel moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted and to authorize the appropriate offices to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT ITEM #19 - First Reading Ord. #6232-98 - Amending Ch. 33, Sec. 33.067, relating to waterways and vessels, to amend defined areas for speed restrictions of vessels (extending wake zone in Clearwater Pass Channel by approx. 350 yards west of Clearwater Pass Bridge, to a point marked by Clearwater Pass Light 6) (MR) By extending the wake zone in Clearwater Pass by approximately 350 yards west of the Clearwater Pass Bridge, to a point marked by Clearwater Pass Light 6, vessels anchored and using the beach on the north side of Clearwater pass will be protected from wakes by passing vessels. This will locate the wake zone approximately 900 yards west of the Clearwater Pass Bridge. This request was reviewed and approval recommended by the Marine Advisory Board. The Florida Marine Patrol has advised the City that the extension of the wake zone would be approved. If the ordinance is passed, the State will send an amendment to the City permit. The U. S. Coast Guard has advised the City they have no http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 a • WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 8 of 10 objection to extending the wake zone and placing wake zone signs on Clearwater Pass Light 6. All other existing City wake zones remain unchanged. In response to questions, Harbormaster Bill Held said at the time of construction of the jetty at Clearwater Pass, the City met all federal and state laws safety issues. A recent accident is under investigation by the Florida Marine Patrol. Should the City wish to make changes to the jetty, permits would be required. Commissioner Clark moved to approve amendment to Chapter 33, Section 33. 067 of the Code of Ordinances extending the wake zone in Clearwater Pass Channel by approximately 350 yards west of the Clearwater Pass Bridge, to a point marked by Clearwater Pass Light 6. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The City Attorney presented Ordinance 6232-98 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance 6232-98 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #20 - Award Phase I of project for Organizational Review Services to Public Strategies Group, base fee $20,000 plus performance fee not to exceed $5,000 and travel & incidental expenses not to exceed $6,000 (CM) Three firms out of nine (that submitted RFQs (Request for Proposal) for a Phase I organizational review of City operations) were considered. Estimated costs indicated in their proposals are as follows: 1) Public Strategies Group total fees of $95,000; total travel costs of $23,000; 2) Arthur Anderson total fees of $1,080,000; total travel costs of $162,000; and 3) Management Partners, Inc. total fees of $321,730; total travel costs of $69,880. Phase I is a diagnostic phase to determine how the City can enhance customer service. The firm selected will gather information and data from the City, conduct interviews with stakeholders, and perform a preliminary SWAT (Strength and Weakness Assessment.) Once Phase I is complete, the firm will determine the remainder of the work to be performed for the project, how the work can be performed, time period, and a better estimate of the remaining project costs. Subsequently, the City will determine how to proceed with completing the project. Clarification of page 5 of the RFP (Request for Proposal) regarding unsatisfactory results from a contractor was requested. Ms. Rice said the language refers to nonpayment for unsatisfactory services. If exceptional work is performed, a bonus is awarded. The City can identify specifics regarding unsatisfactory work. The contractor is provided a second opportunity to perform. Should they still be considered unsatisfactory, they will not be paid. Ms. Rice agreed $31,000 is the maximum to be awarded for Phase 1. In response to questions, Ms. Rice said Phase 1 involves a diagnostic look at the entire City organization to determine if the City is designed for the best efficiency and to provide the best customer service for residents. It was noted the total for all phases is less than budgeted. In response to a question, the City Manager said all payments, excluding travel expenses, can be refunded if the services are unsatisfactory. Commissioner Seel moved to award Phase 1 of the project for Organization Review Services to the Public Strategies Group for a base fee of $20,000 plus a performance fee not to exceed $5,000, and travel and incidental expenses not to exceed $6,000, and the appropriate officials be authorized to http://199.227.23 3.29/ISYSquery/M99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 9 of 10 execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #21 - Library Board - 1 appointment (CLK) Commissioner Clark moved to appoint Lois Martin. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #22 - Parks and Recreation Board - 1 appointment (CLK) Commissioner Clark requested the City Commission defer their consideration of William Kirbas's reappointment to the board until after the election. Commissioner Seel moved to appoint Kim Cashman to the board. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #23 - Appointment of Commissioner to represent the Commission as the Canvassing Board re 3/10/98 Municipal Election (CLK) Commissioner Hooper moved to appoint Commissioner Clark to represent the Commission as the Canvassing representative. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #24 - Other Pending Matters - None. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS ITEM #25 - Res. #98-08 - Assessing property owners the costs of having mowed or cleared owners' lots. ` The City Attorney reported CNHS (Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services) has been paid and eliminated from the list. The City Attorney presented Resolution #98-08 and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass and adopt Resolution #98-08 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper and Seel. "Nayes": None. Absent: Garvey ITEM #26 - Other City Attorney Items a) Penny for Pinellas Extension - Interlocal Agreement Commissioner Seel moved to approve the Penny for Pinellas Extension Interlocal Agreement. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. b) Set attorney/client sessions for Martinez vs. City and Jelks vs. City http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION MEETING Page 10 of 10 The City Attorney requested an attorney/client session regarding Martinez versus City be scheduled for March 19, 1998, at 5:00 p.m. and Jelks versus City be scheduled for March 19, 1998, at 5:20 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Consensus was to so schedule. ITEM #27 - City Manager Verbal Reports - None. ITEM #28 - Other Commission Action Commissioner Seel said the PPC (Pinellas Planning Council) received information regarding proposed changes to the Flood Insurance Rate Map. In response to a question, Mr. Baier said the changes will have some effect on Clearwater as the map moves the velocity zone in some beach areas and closer to Mandalay Avenue. The primary areas affected are Clearwater Beach, Island Estates, and an area along Tampa Bay. Advertisements have been running on C-View TV. Commissioner Seel referred to a copy of a letter regarding pursuing a resolution to the year 2000 problem. Local governments are required to interface with the State's system. The City Manager said the City is working diligently to remedy the problem. Commissioner Hooper asked if the City has experienced any damage or sewage backups due to recent heavy rains. Mr. Baier said there were no sewage backups. There was some slight road damage and two water main breaks. Commissioner Clark said the Historic Preservation Board minutes indicated a neighborhood effort to raise funds for a gate at the Magnolia Street dock. He said a gate was to have been installed when construction took place. W. Baier said a gate was installed, but neighbors decided to raise funds for an upgraded gate. Commissioner Seel thanked the City Manager and C-View TV staff for the new captions at the bottom of the television screen during City meetings. The captions afford the public more information regarding topics discussed. She noted the City Commission agenda is available on C- View TV for public view. The City Manager said the City also makes the agenda available via fax. Commissioner Johnson said the City received $100,000 from the State as a first payment for Brownfields cleanup. He reminded everyone to attend Saturdays in the City, next to Station Square. The Phillies' welcome is scheduled at the Harborview Center on February 24, 1998. The first Spring Training game is scheduled for February 28, 1998. ITEM #29 - Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. 11 02/05/98 mcc02a98 Ask me about ISYS http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/4/doc 06/22/2000 - ---••? ?GP? ?? ? « rust adin Ord. #6231-98 - Rezoni to MP for property (Sunshine Mall) located on S corner of Druid Rd., W of Lakeview Rd., and E of Greenwood Ave., Sec. 15-29-15, 'M&B' 34-01' Ave. . 01 andrSec&22-29-15, M&B 21.01 & 21.02; approve concept plan & refer final site plan to DRC for a certification (Mary Taylor Hancock; Jean Taylor Carter & John S. Taylor III, Z98 p2) al & The applicants are requesting a zoning change for the Sunshine Mall property, at 1200 South Missouri Avenue on the southwest corner of the Druid Road and Missouri Avenue, north of Lakeview Road and east of Greenwood Avenue. They propose to rezone the property and to replat it into apartment units and commercial uses. Parcels 1 - 5C will be used for commercial uses and Parcels 6 and 7 for residential uses. The rezoning will permit 608 apartment units If rezoned MPD (Master Planned development District.) The property is presently zoned CC (Commercial Center) and RM-28 (Multiple Family Residential "Twenty-Eight") with compatible land use plan classifications of Commercial General and Residential High respectively. No land use plan amendment will be involved in the rezoning request. All land assigned the proposed zoning district requires a concept plan be approved by the City Commission. It includes the conceptual layout for apartment buildings, perimeter landscaping buffers for the entire site, and the existing driveways for access. The total land area for the site is 35.4 acres. Twenty-five acres or more are required to establish a new MPD district. This site exceeds 25 acres in area requiring review and approval by the City Commission of the associated site plan simultaneously with this request. The proposed development will involve substantial improvements at the site including water, sewer, drainage facilities, roads, and parking facilities to be installed to City standards and in a manner consistent with the a development will be consistent with an a approved final site plan. The proposed certification, and that will be required to include: 1) alandscat ping not been submitted for 3) a solid waste system; 4) a parking layout relative to the proposedldevelopment; 5)paan, traffic circulation plan; and 6) internal circulation points of access and cross-access. Density requirements will be met at the permitted density of 24 units per acre. Parcel #7 will be used for construction of 408 elderly apartment units. Parcel #6 will be used for construction of 200 general apartment units. The commercial facilities will be on the east side of the subject properties. Staff is working with the applicants to prepare a traffic impact study to determine peak hour levels of service in accordance with the concurrence management program and potential roadway improvements. Staff is reviewing landscape concepts and existing drainage issues. The rezoning request is consistent with the surrounding land use patterns and in character with the neighborhood. The project will contribute positively to redevelopment of the area, mcc02a98 02/05/98 TOTAL P.003 CITY OF CLEARWATER PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DRC COMMENTS - MEETING 3/12/98 (Revised) 1. Oakbrook Subdivision No comment. 2. Sunshine Mall MPD ?The new residential portion of this development will be required to pay Recreation Land Impact Fees prior to certification of the final site plan/plat as well as payment of Recreation Facility Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permits. ?The net land area needs to be clearly noted on the site plan as well as square footage of existing buildings and proposed new buildings. ?The new residential and commercial portion of this development is notvrequired to pay Open Space Assessment Fees as long as any expansion to floor area does not exceed 50% of existing building on site. ?The developer or representative should complete the worksheet attached and contact Debbie Richter in the Parks and Recreation Department at 562-4817 if there are any questions. 3. Tampa Bay Engineering No comment. P?• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE SUMMARY NOTES March 12, 1998 Meeting ITEM 1 Sunshine Mall Redevelopment Proposal James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, 1. Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid West vehicles. Enclosure of such size to store minimum six (6) 90 gallon recycling container per dumpster site. 2. Would recommend use of one or more trash compactors (roll-off type service) service available from City Solid Waste. 3. Applicant may wish to create a centralized solid waste facility. Mike Quillen, Environmental Engineer: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Provide a copy of the on-site drainage calculations to Environmental Management, and 2. Show all protected trees by size, species and location. Prior to issuance of the requisite building permit, 1. Acquire clearing and grubbing and tree removal permits (or no tree verification form) from Environmental Management. Bob Perkins, Engineer II: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Complete the Dumpster Requirement Form and return it to the City Solid Waste Department; 2. Show all proposed utilities, storm water retention/detention systems and 50 ft. perimeter contour elevations; include a looped water distribution system and adding drainage pipe connection on Parcel 6, and 3. Provide recycling area and appropriate screening around dumpsters. Prior to issuance of the requisite building permit, 1. Obtain and Furnish evidence of all applicable permits form other governmental agencies including but not limited to: Pinellas County Public Health Unit Permit, Ingress/Egress and a 10 ft. Utility Easement over the proposed water mains up to and including meters, backflow prevention devices and hydrants, 2. Vacate all Easements proposed to be eliminated, and 3. Provide stormwater attenuation calculations and drainage plan for outparcels to Engineering Services. r Bob Perkins, Engineer II (cont.): Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, 1. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk raps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including ADA, and install sidewalk where none exists in the street right-of- way. 2. Have the City install backflow prevention devices with the owner/applicant paying all applicable fees; 3. Visually screen the dumpster/compactors and provide gates with a minimum 12 ft. clear opening to the front for access by Solid Waste vehicles; 4. Furnish as-builts and an engineer's certification to Engineering Services, and 5. Record the Final Plat. Prior to recordation of the Final Plat, 1. Vacate existing easements as required prior to recording plat which must be recorded prior to the first certificate of occupancy, and 2. Quit Claim sanitary sewer parcel and dedicate as easement on plat. Steve Dohertv. Central Permitting Supervisor: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Label all streets and surrounding properties. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, 1. all landscaping proposed which adjoins Missouri Ave. shall be provided. Other comments: 1. Each phase of project is subject to certified site plan review. Mike Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer: Prior to certification of the site plan, 1. Revise street and parcel accesses to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 2. Provide side walk and utility easements as needed; 3. Show Druid Road geometrics and label side streets along Missouri Ave., and 4. Provide access agreements as needed, and provide sidewalks as per city code. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic Engineering Office, and 2. Pass parking lot inspection. r Art Kader Interim Director Parks and Recreation (not in attendance): Prior to certification of the site plan: 1. The new residential portion of this development will be required to pay Recreation Land Impact Fees and 2. The net land area needs to be clearly noted on the site plan as well as square footage of existing and proposed buildings on the site. Prior to issuance of the requisite building permit: 1. Payment of the Recreation Facility Impact Fee shall be made for the residential portion of this development. DRCSUMM4RYNOTES031298 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department March 12, 1998 at 9:15 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for SUNSHINE MALL (PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN) FORMAL REVIEW Reviewed by: Department name: Tr Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCCOAUffiNTS031298 A A.. Before the SITE PLAN can be certified, the applicant must complete the following action(s)checked below: ZONING 1. Show the following on the site plan: O Legal description of the property. O Site area (square feet and acres). O Number of dwelling units and hotel units proposed and the resulting net density. 0 Floor area devoted to each category of use. 0 Floor area ratio. 0 Property owner's name, address and telephone number and the designated project representative name, address and telephone number. (and fax numbers). OPerimeter landscape buffer OParking formula calculation for each use. OLocations of all driveways, parking areas and curb cuts. ODelineation in mapped form and computation of the area of the sited devoted to building coverage, open space for the lot, open space for the front yard and building coverage expressed in sq. ft. and as a percentage of the overall site. OLocation and screening of all refuse containers /compactors. ONorth arrow. OZoning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. OIdentify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. 02. Identify changes to the site data table if this is a plan amendment. 03. Submit a completed CONCURRENCY REVIEW application for review with required fee 04.Show all contiguous streets & roads. 05.Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address. 06.Limit the site plan to one page. 07.Legally record a Unity of Title for the project site and furnish proof of such action. 08.Show the date(s) and condition(s) for approval of (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning & Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or (b) a variance from the Flood Board for construction within 18 feet of a seawall. 09. Other comments: FIRE DEPARTMENT O1. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. 02. Locate on the plan minimum 20 Ft wide (a) FIRE LANE(S) on the N--, E--, S---' W side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 feet. 03. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. 04. Locate a FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure at ? 5.Other comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ? 1. Show on the site plan the installation and maintenance of uniform traffic control devices at appropriate locations in accordance with the standards set forth by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation under Rule 14.115.010, Florida Administrative Code. ?2. Show applicable Florida Statute number for handicapped parking spaces. ?3. Show all striping, pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan conforming to F.D.O.T. Standard Indexs-1995 edition and F.A.C. 14- 110 (no 4" striping is to be shown). ?4. Show dimensions of aisles, parking stalls, entrances and measurements for like plan features on the plan. ?5. Show all pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan. ?6. Adjust handicap spaces to meet governmental standards with the correct handicap signs. ?7. Adjust parking stalls and/or driveways on the plan to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. ?8. Indicate the location of lighting fixtures in the parking areas on the site plan. ?9. Show all on-site lighting with 90-degree cutoffs directed away from abutting streets right-of- way and residential properties. ? 10.Obtain a Significant Change of Use Determination from the FDOT per Florida Statute 335. ? 11. Execute a cross-parking/access easement linking the site with the site and specifying the exact number and location of the spaces that are to be jointly used by and between the sites after review and approval of the easement or agreement by the appropriate City Staff ?12. Address and resolve the need for right turn/left turn auxiliary lanes and the queuing for traffic related to the p jest. L 13. thercomments: try 5fW_e_ AaYGG1 *Uerses SQ tJttit.?'ton Ot_ ?; %tA t 4 eeb- , Sheu3 17vvid k o&4 jeow.t4-rti s aM-? k6a side.Otme- cry M?%'So'zrt rTTy el ]k rJ1.rX-1k AL AGEMENT .J 14. aekes$ Q r?? QS ec. s t oG? ? C ir?i-L- El. Vrovide a copy o pe it application and calculations to Environmental Management. ?2. Show all protected trees by size, species and location. ?3. Show total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas expressed in square feet and as a percentage of the overall site in the site plan data block. ?4. Provide dimensions on the plan for perimeter landscape buffers. ?5 Reflect the use of raised curbs or protective timbers on the site plan where interior landscaped areas abut pavement. ?6. Depict all required parking lot interior areas on the plan by shading or cross-hatching. ?7.Other comments: F'NI;INFEIG PLAN REVIELT? ? 1. Show ADA ramps for sidewalks on the site plan. ?2. Complete the Dumpster Requirement Form and return it to the City Solid Waste Department. ?3. Add a note to the site plan stating "It it the ntponsibility of the owner to roll the dumprter to a derignated location at an arrigned time as appmt ed by the Solid Waste Superintendent " ?4. State on the construction plan that the detector check should be DDCVA with the by-pass meter installed by the City with fee paid by contractor. ?5. State on the plan that the 6" fire line tap to the 6" City water line is to state "6x6 tap" so that City Utility Accounts will know what fee to bill the contractor. ?6. Show backflow device(s) on plans as RPD. ?7. Show all proposed utilities, storm water retention/detention systems and 50' perimeter contour elevations. ?8. Have the final site plan signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. ?9.Other comments: PARKS AND RECREATION ?1. Pay the required Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fee with review by the Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department. ?2. Note that the project is exempt from the City's Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fees. ?3.Other comments: B. Before the City can issue BUILDING PERMITS, the applicant must complete the following actions: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT [31. Furnish the SWFWMD permit to Clearwater Environmental Management. 02. Acquire clearing and grubbing and tree removal permits or a no tree verification form from Environmental Management. ?3. Provide drainage calculations. ?4.Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW ?1.Obtain and furnish evidence of all applicable permits from other governmental agencies including but not limited to: (a) FDOT permit for work within the right-of-way to Engineering Services; (b) Pinellas County Public Health Unit Permit, Ingress/Egress and a 10 foot Utility Easement over the proposed water mains up to and including meters, backflow prevention and hydrants. ?2. Pay the sewer impact assessment fee, based on the size of the water meter with assistance in determining the fee from Central Permitting/Licensing specialists. ?3.Other comments: C. Before the City can issue a CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the applicant must complete the following actions: ?QNING O 1.Comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING O1. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic Engineering Office. , X2. Other comments: ?aSS S t b Tr'c ENGINEERING PLANREVIE? ? 1. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including ADA, and install sidewalk where none exists in the street right of way. ?2. Have the City install backflow prevention devices with the owner/applicant paying all applicable fees. 03. Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid Waste vehicles. ?4. Furnish as-builts and an engineer's certification to Engineering Services. E35. Other comments: D. Complete the following actions as indicated: ZONING ? 1. Obtain the requisite building permits within one(1) year from the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. ?2. Obtain the requisite certificate(s) of occupancy within three (3) years of the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. [33. Obtain review of and permits for signs and fencing/walls through separate review and permitting procedures. 134. Other comments: MCCOM114N[3010"8 Before the PRELIMINARY PLAT can be recorded, the applicant must complete the following action(s) checked below: A. Show the following on the plan: 01. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax number of the applicant or property owner if other than the applicant, and the person preparing the plat, 03. Identification clearly stating that the drawing is a preliminary plat, 04. Legal description of the property, U.S. Survey section, township and range, 05. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements, 06. Proposed street names, 07. names, appropriately positioned, of adjoining plats; 08. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimensions and area of: The overall plat, Each lot,_ Street rights-of-way, including radii of cul-de-sacs, and Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, ?9. North arrow, scale and date. B. Show the following on the preliminary plat supplementary drawing: 01. Title of the associated preliminary plat, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers of the applicant, property owner if other that the applicant, and person preparing the drawing, ?3. Sanitary sewer, public water supply, stormwater drainage, school or other identifiable service or taxing districts, ?4. nearest arterial or collector roadway intersection 05. Buildings, watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees and other existing features within the area to be platted and similar facts regarding existing conditions on land immediately adjacent thereto, 06. inventory of existing natural resources and/or environmentally unique areas on the site, ?7. Existing sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, culverts and other underground structures within the plat or immediately adjacent thereto, including the location and size of the nearest water and sewer lines, 08. existing and proposed spot elevations 09. Proposed use of each lot and existing and proposed zoning of all property within the plat ? 10. Zoning district classification for adjacent property 011. Location of common open space, parks and other public or semi public areas or facilities within or immediately adjacent to the property to be platted 012. location and size of sanitary sewers or other sewage disposal facilities planned, 013. Land to be dedicated to the city, including. a. Street right-of-way, by functional classification, b. Recreation land, recreation facilities and open space, c. Any other public use, ? 14. Preliminary site drainage system including7 a. General surface drainage pattern, including proposed retention area, b. Floodplain definition and effect of applicable local , state or federal flood standards or elevations. •' Y C. Other Department Comments: ? 1. Zoning comments: ?2. Fire Department comments: ?3. Traffic Engineering comments: ?4. Environmental Management comments: ? 5. Engineering Plan Review comments: ?6. Parks and Recreation comments: DRCCO11E1FNfS012998 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department March 12,1998 at 9:15 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for SUNSHINE MALL (PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN) FORMAL REVIEW Reviewed by. ?- 17c??ic i?t Department name: Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCCOA MENTS031298 A. Before the SITE PLAN can be certified, the applicant must complete the following action(s)checked below- whyMa .15- D v. E(-0e0-(-y x 1. Show the following on the site plan: Wff, gal description of the property. MIX ts 1 S'te area (square feet and acres). Sooty P KG9 d rr Lo . tuber of dwelling units and hotel units proposed and the resulting net density. .06or area devoted to each category of use. /Ffloor area ratio. Er © Property owner's name, address and telephone number and the designated project representative name, address and telephone number. (and fax numbers). UrPerimeter landscape buffer -?? CAParking formula calculation for each use. OLocations of all driveways, parking areas and curb cuts. iat?.,??1?;Ra £vmaod,cprrapulatioo of the of,th& sited devoted to building .. are.4 coverage, open space for the lot, open space for 'tie front yard and 6iiitding coverage expressed ' in sq. ft. and as a percentage of the overall site. OLocation and screening of all refuse containers /compactors. ONorth arrow. OZoning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. OIdentify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. 02. Identify changes to the site data table if this is a plan amendment. 03. Submit a completed CONCURRENCY REVIEW application for review with required fee 04.Show all contiguous streets & roads. 05.Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address.. 06.Limit the site plan to one page. 07.Legally record a Unity of Title for the project site and furnish proof of such action. 08.Show the date(s) and condition(s) for approval of (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning & Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or (b) a variance from the Flood Board for construction within 18 feet of a seawall. 139. Other comments: FIRE DEPARTMENT O1. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. 02. Locate on the plan minimum 20 Ft wide (a) FIRE LANE(S) on the N__, E___, S___, W side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 feet. 03. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. 04. Locate a FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure at ?5.Other comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING O1. Show on the site plan the installation and maintenance of uniform traffic control devices at appropriate locations in accordance with the standards set forth by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation under Rule 14.115.010, Florida Administrative Code. ?2. Show applicable Florida Statute number for handicapped parking spaces. ?3. Show all striping, pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan conforming to F.D.O.T. Standard Indexs-1995 edition and F.A.C. 14- 110 (no 4" striping is to be shown). ?4. Show dimensions of aisles, parking stalls, entrances and measurements for like plan features on the plan. ?5. Show all pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices- on the site. plan. •''" .j '1 6.'1Sajust"hant ica?s spaces:f fiieetgdv r?mdht l"staxida ds:?i the•correcl~handi44 ?7. Adjust parking stalls and/or driveways on the plan to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. ?8. Indicate the location of lighting fixtures in the parking areas on the site plan. ?9. Show all on-site lighting with 90-degree cutoffs directed away from abutting streets right-of- way and residential properties. ? 10.Obtain a Significant Change of Use Determination from the FDOT per Florida Statute 335. ? 11. Execute a cross-parking/access easement linking the site with the site and specifying the exact number and location of the spaces that are to be jointly used by and between the sites after review and approval of the easement or agreement by the appropriate City Staff. ?12. Address and resolve the need for right turn/left turn auxiliary lanes and the queuing for traffic related to the project. ? 13.Other comments: &-Lor-Ang- L721 J `r o? 1) uZ -11]2? PR•N, p< 4pc>6j (-• CL"W,C. Z>z'7' o .1111tSSouK i I S.awaua eW 1AJ M-kX,-r_ ' uv ,4J GC-s.rfo - e • ?RONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ?1. Provide a copy of the SWFWMD permit application and calculations to Environmental Management. ?2. Show all protected trees by size, species and location. ?3. Show total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas expressed in square feet and as a percentage of the overall site in the site plan data block. ?4. Provide dimensions on the plan for perimeter landscape buffers. ?5 Reflect the use of raised curbs or protective timbers on the site plan where interior landscaped areas abut pavement. ?6. Depict all required parking lot interior areas on the plan by shading or cross-hatching. ?7.Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIE[l? ? 1. Show ADA ramps for sidewalks on the site plan. ?2. Complete the Dumpster Requirement Form and return it to the City Solid Waste Department. ? 3. Add a note to the site plan stating "It is the rerponsibi4ty of the owner to roll the dumpster to a designated location at an an geed time as appmmd by the Solid Waste Superintendent. " ?4. State on the construction plan that the detector check should be DDCVA with the by-pass meter installed by the City with fee paid by contractor. ?5. State on the plan that the 6" fire line tap to the 6" City water line is to state "6x6 tap" so that City Utility Accounts will know what fee to bill the contractor. ?6. Show backflow device(s) on plans as RPD. ?7. Show all proposed utilities, storm water retention/detention systems and 50' perimeter contour elevations. 08. Have the final site plan signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. ?9.Other comments: PARKS AND RECREATION E Ni y I? 2 N? W ?U p J 3 4°I U J 0 O1. Pay the required Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fee with review by the Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department. ?2. Note that the project is exempt from the City's Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fees. 03. Other comments: B. Before the City can issue BUILDING PERMITS, the applicant must complete the following actions: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 171. Furnish the SWFWMD permit to Clearwater Environmental Management. 132. Acquire clearing and grubbing and tree removal permits or a no tree verification form from Environmental Management. ?3. Provide drainage calculations.' ?4. Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIE[V pI ?e S ?1.Obtain and furnish evidence of all applicable permits from other governmental agencies including but not limited to: _(a) FDOT permit for work within the right-of-way to Engineering Services; _(b) Pinellas County Public Health Unit Permit, Ingress/Egress and a 10 foot Utility Easement over the.proposed water mains up to and including meters, backflow prevention and hydrants. E32. Pay the sewer impact assessment fee, based on the size of the water meter with assistance in determining the fee from Central Permitting/Licensing specialists. [33. Other comments: ?``? Si ?? ?ov?? ?°a c r"°? S sN-O? (?= ? ? «t s S,Nv?,? pvr.?-?,aSc ? ?-v c?? CiT"Y 1,01z60eLe&T--( v? ?J C. Before the City can issue a CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the applicant must complete the following actions: ZONING ? 1.Comments• TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ?1. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic . Frn»!e?rlF?g.?Efice.: - .. .. •... • .02. Other comments: ENGINEERING PLANREVIEP? O1. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including ADA, and install sidewalk where none exists in the street right of way. ?2. Have the City install backflow prevention devices with the owner/applicant paying all applicable fees. ?3. Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid Waste vehicles. ?4. Furnish as-builts and an engineer's certification to Engineering Services. ?5.Other comments: 17Lar W,til oit. D. Complete the following actions as indicated: ZONING O1.Obtain the requisite building permits within one(1) year from the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. 02. Obtain the requisite certificate(s) of occupancy within three (3) years of the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. ?3.Obtain review of and permits for signs and fencing/walls through separate review and permitting procedures. ?4. Other comments: MCCOMMEMS01"98 Before the PRELIMINARY PLAT can be recorded, the applicant must complete the following action(s) checked below: A. Show the following on the plan: ? 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax number of the applicant or property owner if other than the applicant, and the person preparing the plat, ?3. Identification clearly stating that the drawing is a preliminary plat, ?4. Legal description of the property, U.S. Survey section, township and range, ?5. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements, ?6. Proposed street names, ?7. names, appropriately positioned, of adjoining plats; ?8. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimensions and area of The overall plat, F-ach lot,_ Street rights-of-way, including radii of cul-de-sacs, and Cortimpn .q en.sp ace pr other la pd to e dedicated. Dr.a.public purTosc,.• , t ?1? !t-. . !.•'j• s.. :• T .+...w ... s. ;t .h 'S. e:•r' •? ..: a. •.:; i' A. J:" • .. !i rt "`'.' .L. r. ?9. North arrow, scale'and date. B. Show the following on the preliminary plat supplementary drawing: ? 1. Title of the associated preliminary plat, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers of the applicant, property owner if other that the applicant, and person preparing the drawing, ?3. Sanitary sewer, public water supply, stormwater drainage, school or other identifiable service or taxing districts, ?4. nearest arterial or collector roadway intersection ?5. Buildings, watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees and other existing features within the area to be platted and similar facts regarding existing conditions on land immediately adjacent thereto, ?6. inventory of existing natural resources and/or environmentally unique areas on the site, ?7. Existing sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, culverts and other underground structures within the plat or immediately adjacent thereto, including the location and size of the nearest water and sewer lines, ?8. existing and proposed spot elevations ?9. Proposed use of each lot and existing and proposed zoning of all property within the plat ? 10. Zoning district classification for adjacent property ? 11. Location of common open space, parks and other public or semi public areas or facilities within or immediately adjacent to the property to be platted ?12. location and size of sanitary sewers or other sewage disposal facilities planned, ? 13. Land to be dedicated to the city, including. a. Street right-of-way, by functional classification, b. Recreation land, recreation facilities and open space, c. Any other public use, ? 14. Preliminary site drainage system including. a. General surface drainage pattern, including proposed retention area, b. Floodplain definition and effect of applicable local , state or federal flood standards or elevations. C. Other Department Comments: ? 1. Zoning comments: ?2. Fire Department comments: ?3- Traffie Engineering comment: ...•?c .?•. ?j.. s: .. r.s• ... .. ?.,':.Y. .a' .vs'`-s" `d7., .fir 's• f.• .. ., : •... , ?4. Environmental Management comments: ?5. Engineering Plan Review comments: ?6. Parks and Recreation comments: DRCCONAENUS012998 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department March 12,1998 at 9:15 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for SUNSHINE MALL (PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN) FORMAL REVIEW Reviewed by: 6,6 Pee, k,r, S Department name: (2W Adty% i n , Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCCOMMENTS031298 A. Before the SITE PLAN can be certified, the applicant must complete the following action(s)checked below: ZO I 1. Show the following on the site plan: ? Legal description of the property. ? Site area (square feet and acres). ? Number of dwelling units and hotel units proposed and the resulting net density. O Floor area devoted to each category of use. ? Floor area ratio. ? Property owner's name, address and telephone number and the designated project representative name, address and telephone number. (and fax numbers). OPerimeter landscape buffer [Parking formula calculation for each use. [Locations of all driveways, parking areas and curb cuts. [Delineation in mapped form and computation of the area of the sited devoted to building coverage, open space for the lot, open space for the front yard and building coverage expressed in sq. ft. and as a percentage of the overall site. ?Location and screening of all refuse containers /compactors. [North arrow. [Zoning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. [Identify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. 02. Identify changes to the site data table if this is a plan amendment. ?3. Submit a completed CONCURRENCY REVIEW application for review with required fee ?4.Show all contiguous streets & roads. ?5.Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address. ?6.Limit the site plan to one page. 071-egally record a Unity of Title for the project site and furnish proof of such action. ?8.Show the date(s) and condition(s) for approval of: (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning & Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or (b) a variance from the Flood Board for construction within 18 feet of a seawall. ?9.Other comments: FIRE DEPARTMENT 01. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. 02. Locate on the plan minimum 20 Ft wide (a) FIRE LANE(S) on the N--, E---, S---, W side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 feet. 03. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. ?4. Locate a FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure at [35. Other comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ?1. Show on the site plan the installation and maintenance of uniform traffic control devices at appropriate locations in accordance with the standards set forth by the Manual on Uniform TraA iic Control Devices as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation under Rule 14.115.010, Florida Administrative Code. ?2. Show applicable Florida Statute number for handicapped parking spaces. ?3. Show all striping, pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan conforming to F.D.O.T. Standard Indexs-1995 edition and F.A.C. 14- 110 (no 4" striping is to be shown). O4. Show dimensions of aisles, parking stalls, entrances and measurements for like plan features on the plan. 05. Show all pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan. ?6. Adjust handicap spaces to meet governmental standards with the correct handicap signs. ?7. Adjust parking stalls and/or driveways on the plan to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. 08. Indicate the location of lighting fixtures in the parking areas on the site plan. ?9. Show all on-site lighting with 90-degree cutoffs directed away from abutting streets right-of- way and residential properties. [310. Obtain a Significant Change of Use Determination from the MOT per Florida Statute 335. 011. Execute a cross-parking/access easement linking the site with the site and specifying the exact number and location of the spaces that are to be jointly used by and between the sites after review and approval of the easement or agreement by the appropriate City Staff. ?12. Address and resolve the need for right turn/left turn auxiliary lanes and the queuing for traffic related to the project. ? 13. Other comments: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT O1. Provide a copy of the SWFWMD permit application and calculations to Environmental Management. ?2. Show all protected trees by size, species and location. ?3. Show total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas expressed in square feet and as a percentage of the overall site in the site plan data block. 04. Provide dimensions on the plan for perimeter landscape buffers. ?5 Reflect the use of raised curbs or protective timbers on the site plan where interior landscaped areas abut pavement. ?6. Depict all required parking lot interior areas on the plan by shading or cross-hatching. ?7.Other comments: LcNGT7vFFRWG LAN REVIELY? . ? 1. Show ADA ramps for sidewalks on the site plan. .il2. Complete the Dumpster Requirement Form and return it to the City Solid Waste Department. ? 3. Add a note to the site plan stating "It it the nrponsihility of the owner to and the dumprter to a dtrignated location at an arrigned time at appmtvd by the Solid Waste S*etintendent. " ?4. State on the construction plan that the detector check should be DDCVA with the by-pass meter installed by the City with fee paid by contractor. ?5. State on the plan that the 6" fire line tap to the 6" City water line is to state "6x6 tap" so that City Utility Accounts will know what fee to bill the contractor. ?6. Show backflow device(s) on plans as RPD. )Er7. Show all proposed utilities, storm water retention /detention systems and 50' perimeter contour elevations. ?8. Have the final site plan signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. (( t9. Other comments: loc.luc tlnc A jooeZd ?.044fr &a 4r IaA evi sysl elv_, Q0C` nil/Y. Jlo /?ri. ?i•nn i ?,,'nn /?•,nnPP??n !;)In PQlC Q,1 Co . Prodo'c?:- rec??l? Arced anti `yrr°pri"n4e scree-vii) avowld dvr,.,es4ers. PARKS AND RECREATION 131. Pay the required Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fee with review by the Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department. ?2. Note that the project is exempt from the City's Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fees. 03. Other comments: B. Before the City can issue BUILDING PERMITS, the applicant must complete the following actions: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ?1. Furnish the SWFWMD permit to Clearwater Environmental Management. 02. Acquire clearing and grubbing and tree removal permits or a no tree verification form from Environmental Management. ?3. Provide drainage calculations. 04. Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEtI? Obtain and furnish evidence of all applicable permits from other governmental agencies including but not limited to: _(a) FDOT permit for work within the right-of-way to Engineering Services; Pinellas County Public Health Unit Permit, Ingress/Egress and a 10 foot Utility Easement over the proposed water mains up to and including meters, backflow prevention and hydrants. 02. Pay the sewer impact assessment fee, based on the size of the water meter with assistance in determining the fee from Central Permitting/Licensing specialists. n 123. Other comments: P'o,ji do ! IAoavajc ltit r a??C rMC ? ? ?r. CC.1". cl ld dr6j:.'+4 .0 D10 'fo'r 0u? rce 15. C. Before the City can issue a CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the applicant must complete the following actions: ZONING 01.Comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ? 1. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic Engineering Office. 02. Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including ADA, and install sidewalk where none exists in the street right of way. tr Have the City install backflow prevention devices with the owner/applicant paying all applicable fees. M Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid Waste vehicles. ,214. Furnish as-builts and an engineer's certification to Engineering Services. ,jam. Other comments: c c r, (4 2 )a+ D. Complete the following actions as indicated: ZONING 01.Obtain the requisite building permits within one(1) year from the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. 02. Obtain the requisite certificate(s) of occupancy within three (3) years of the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. 03. Obtain review of and permits for signs and fencing/walls through separate review and permitting procedures. 04. Other comments: D R CC O M 11 f E M010"" Before the PRELIMINARY PLAT can be recorded, the applicant must complete the following action(s) checked below: A. Show the following on the plan: ? 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax number of the applicant or property owner if other than the applicant, and the person preparing the plat, ?3. Identification clearly stating that the drawing is a preliminary plat, ?4. Legal description of the property, U.S. Survey section, township and range, ?5. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements, ?6. Proposed street names, ?7. names, appropriately positioned, of adjoining plats; ?8. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimensions and area of: The overall plat, Each lot,__ Street rights-of-way, including radii of cul-de-sacs, and Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, ?9. North arrow, scale and date. B. Show the following on the preliminary plat supplementary drawing- 01. Title of the associated preliminary plat, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers of the applicant, property owner if other that the applicant, and person preparing the drawing, ?3. Sanitary sewer, public water supply, stormwater drainage, school or other identifiable service or taxing districts, ?4. nearest arterial or collector roadway intersection ?5. Buildings, watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees and other existing features within the area to be platted and similar facts regarding existing conditions on land immediately adjacent thereto, ?6. inventory of existing natural resources and/or environmentally unique areas on the site, ?7. Existing sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, culverts and other underground structures within the plat or immediately adjacent thereto, including the location and size of the nearest water and sewer lines, ?8. existing and proposed spot elevations ?9. Proposed use of each lot and existing and proposed zoning of all property within the plat ? 10. Zoning district classification for adjacent property ? 11. Location of common open space, parks and other public or semi public areas or facilities within or immediately adjacent to the property to be platted ? 12. location and size of sanitary sewers or other sewage disposal facilities planned, ? 13. Land to be dedicated to the city, including. a. Street right-of-way, by functional classification, b. Recreation land, recreation facilities and open space, c. Any other public use, ? 14. Preliminary site drainage system including. a. General surface drainage pattern, including proposed retention area, b. Floodplain definition and effect of applicable local , state or federal flood standards or elevations. v ? ,Y C. Other Department Comments: ? 1. Zoning comments: ?2. Fire Department comments: ?3. Traffic Engineering comments: ?4. Environmental Management comments: 5. Engineering Plan Review comments: ' Vac,4 pi ,6 i,, eA3.r e,, -s as r e? re G IpY ? yr 4V f{cord, Ng t.)44 Wh ILH Mus'F be rtcorde_c) m r cr fn -?;'rs ?. C_ Q;'? C?n., Sa1 Rat4 5¢wfc rc j 4n,A, d Lcdtle cis case.,"e.4 c-A, g2lr.-? ?6. Parks and Recreation comments: DRCCOMMEYITI7012999 r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department March 12, 1998 at 9:15 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for SUNSHINE MALL (PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN) FORMAL REVIEW r Reviewed by: Department name: ?? C C?iC72(? Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCCONRffiNTS031298 f A. Before the SITE PLAN can be certified, the applicant must complete the following action(s)checked below: ZD-N-rN-G 1. Show the following on the site plan: OLocations of all driveways, parking areas and curb cuts. ODelineation in mapped form and computation of the area of the sited devoted to building coverage, open space for the lot, open space for the front yard and building coverage expressed in sq. ft. and as a percentage of the overall site. OLocation and screening of all refuse containers /compactors. ?North arrow. ?Zoning assigned to the subject property and surrounding properties depicted on the plan. ?Identify and distinguish between the new and existing buildings and driveways as well as other features on the plan. O Legal description of the property- • Site area (square feet and acres). ? Number of dwelling units and hotel units proposed and the resulting net density. O Floor area devoted to each category of use. ? Floor area ratio. O Property owner's name, address and telephone number and the designated project representative name, address and telephone number. (and fax numbers). OPerimeter landscape buffer ?Parking formula calculation for each use. 02. Identify changes to the site data table if this is a plan amendment. 03. Submit a completed CONCURRENCY REVIEW application for review with required fee ?4.Show all contiguous streets & roads. ?5.Display the site address on the site plan, obtaining assistance as needed from the responsible Zoning Specialist in establishing the correct address. ?6.Limit the site plan to one page. ?7.Legally record a Unity of Title for the project site and furnish proof of such action. 08.Show the date(s) and condition(s) for approval of: (a) variance or conditional use approvals by the Planning & Zoning Board or the Development Code Adjustment Board(s), or (b) a variance from the Flood Board for construction within 18 feet of a seawall. 09. Other comments: FIRE DEPAR?`ME1VT ?1. Show on the plan a fire department connection a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly to provide for sprinklers. ?2. Locate on the plan minimum 20 Ft wide (a) FIRE LANE(S) on the N E---, S----, W side of the structure beginning not closer to the structure than 10 feet. ?3. Show minimum turning radii for designated drives and fire lanes as 42 feet on the plan. ?4. Locate a FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY on the plan not more than 300 feet from the structure at I . [35. Other comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 01. Show on the site plan the installation and maintenance of uniform traffic control devices at appropriate locations in accordance with the standards set forth by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation under Rule 14.115.010, Florida Administrative Code. O2. Show applicable Florida Statute number for handicapped parking spaces. 03. Show all striping, pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan conforming to F.D.O.T. Standard Indexs-1995 edition and F.A.C. 14 110 (no 4" striping is to be shown). 04. Show dimensions of aisles, parking stalls, entrances and measurements for like plan features on the plan. 05. Show all pavement markings, signage and traffic control devices on the site plan. 06. Adjust handicap spaces to meet gbvetnmental standards with the correct handicap signs. 07. Adjust parking stalls and/or driveways on the plan to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. 08. Indicate the location of lighting fixtures in the parking areas on the site plan. 09. Show all on-site lighting with 90-degree cutoffs directed away from abutting streets right-of- way and residential properties. 010. Obtain a Significant Change of Use Determination from the FDOT per Florida Statute 335. 011. Execute a cross-parking/access easement linking the site with the site and specifying the exact number and location of the spaces that are to be jointly used by and between the sites after review and approval of the easement or agreement by the appropriate City Staff. 012. Address and resolve the need for right turn/left turn auxiliary lanes and the queuing for traffic related to the project. 013. Other comments: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT . Provide a copy of the calculations to Environmental Management. X2. Show all protected trees by size, species and location. 03. Show total paved vehicular use area and total interior landscape areas expressed in square feet and as a percentage of the overall site in the site plan data block. 04. Provide dimensions on the plan for perimeter landscape buffers. 05 Reflect the use of raised curbs or protective timbers on the site plan where interior landscaped areas abut pavement. 06. Depict all required parking lot interior areas on the plan by shading or cross-hatching. [37. Other comments: FNl;?1VFERING PLAN REVIEW O1. Show ADA ramps for sidewalks on the site plan. E32. Complete the Dumpster Requirement Form and return it to the City Solid Waste Department. [3 3. Add a note to the site plan stating "It it the rgonsibikt e of the owner to mll the dumpster to a designated location at an arrigned time as fpmmd by the Solid Waste Supefintendent " O4. State on the construction plan that the detector check should be DDCVA with the by-pass meter installed by the City with fee paid by contractor. O5. State on the plan that the 6" fire line tap to the 6" City water line is to state "6x6 tap" so that City Utility Accounts will know what fee to bill the contractor. O6. Show backflow device(s) on plans as RPD. ?7. Show all proposed utilities, storm water retention/detention systems and 50' perimeter contour elevations. 138. Have the final site plan signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. ?9.Other comments: PARKS AND RECREATION 131. Pay the required Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fee with review by the Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department. ?2. Note that the project is exempt from the City's Open Space and Recreation Assessment Fees. [33. Other comments: B. Before the City can issue BUILDING PERMITS, the applicant must complete the following actions: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ?1. Furnish the SWFWMD permit to Clearwater Environmental Management. Acquire clearing and grubbing and tree removal permits or a no tree verification form from Environmental Management. 173. Provide drainage calculations. 04. Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIE[V ?1. Obtain and furnish evidence of all applicable permits from other governmental agencies including but not limited to: _(a) FDOT permit for work within the right-of-way to Engineering Services; -___(b) Pinellas County Public Health Unit Permit, Ingress /Egress and a 10 foot Utility Easement over the proposed water mains up to and including meters, backflow prevention and hydrants. ?2. Pay the sewer impact assessment fee, based on the size of the water meter with assistance in determining the fee from Central Permitting/Licensing specialists. ?3.Other comments: C. Before the City can issue a CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the applicant must complete the following actions: ZONING M .Comments: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 01. Pay the Transportation Impact Fee as called for by the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance with assistance in determining the fee from the Clearwater Traffic Engineering Office. 02. Other comments: ENGINEERING PLAN REVIE 01. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including ADA, and install sidewalk where none exists in the street right of way. 02. Have the City install backElow prevention devices with the owner/applicant paying all applicable fees. 03. Visually screen the dumpster and provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Solid Waste vehicles. 04. Furnish as-builts and an engineer's certification to Engineering Services. 135. Other comments: D. Complete the following actions as indicated: ZONING 01. Obtain the requisite building permits within one(1) year from the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. 02. Obtain the requisite certificate(s) of occupancy within three (3) years of the site plan certification date to prevent expiration of the site plan certification. [33. Obtain review of and permits for signs and fencing/walls through separate review and permitting procedures. E34. Other comments: DR00011MeM010898 Before the PRELIMINARY PLAT can be recorded, the applicant must complete the following action(s) checked below: A. Show the following on the plan: ? 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax number of the applicant or property owner if other than the applicant, and the person preparing the plat, ?3. Identification clearly stating that the drawing is a preliminary plat, ?4. Legal description of the property, U.S. Survey section, township and range, ?5. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements, ?6. Proposed street names, ?7. names, appropriately positioned, of adjoining plats; ?8. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimensions and area of: The overall plat, Each lot,_ Street rights-of-way, including radii of cul-de-sacs, and Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, ?9. North arrow, scale and date. B. Show the following on the. preliminary plat supplementary drawing: ?1. Title of the associated preliminary plat, ?2. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers of the applicant, property owner if other that the applicant, and person preparing the drawing, ?3. Sanitary sewer, public water supply, stormwater drainage, school or other identifiable service or taxing districts, ?4. nearest arterial or collector roadway intersection ?5. Buildings, watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees and other existing features within the area to be platted and similar facts regarding existing conditions on land immediately adjacent thereto, ?6. inventory of existing natural resources and/or environmentally unique areas on the site, ?7. Existing sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, culverts and other underground structures within the plat or immediately adjacent thereto, including the location and size of the nearest water and sewer lines, ?8. existing and proposed spot elevations ?9. Proposed use of each lot and existing and proposed zoning of all property within the plat ? 10. Zoning district classification for adjacent property ? 11. Location of common open space, parks and other public or semi public areas or facilities within or immediately adjacent to the property to be platted ?12. location and size of sanitary sewers or other sewage disposal facilities planned, ? 13. Land to be dedicated to the city, including. a. Street right-of-way, by functional classification, b. Recreation land, recreation facilities and open space, c. Any other public use, ? 14. Preliminary site drainage system including. a. General surface drainage pattern, including proposed retention area, b. Floodplain definition and effect of applicable local , state or federal flood standards or elevations. C. Other Department Comments: ? 1. Zoning comments: ?2. Fire Department comments: 03. Traffic Engineering comments: 04. Environmental Management comments: ? 5. Engineering Plan Review comments: ?6. Parks and Recreation comments: DRCCOAafENIS012"8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Central Permitting Department March 12, 1998 at 9:45 a.m. Conference Room 216 Standard review comments for TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING DREW "19" SHOPPING CENTER CURE PLAN COURTESY REVIEW Reviewed by Department name: Please return comments to Steve Doherty DRCC0MMBNTS031298 ?K I SdNsrx?? M?c..?. ?Zr per ??? PLHTS 1140.00 TOR4 0.00 J jt} CF;CK 1140.00 222-57A-12 :0 IIEC.10 :77CHNG .00 LINE 05 CLEA, t N -Whlr1 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A., CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 CITY OF CLEARWATER Check Number: Check Date: 2933 7/16/98 Check Description: Payee: Ct? .?G? CITY OF CLEARWATER 002033 Amount: 250.00 039193.098381 r `?iT X5.00 TOTt_ ^5.00 CHCK 25.00 ,"_?;!0:07FEP.1070 CHNG .00 1T NE 05 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. 02307- Additional Fee Sunshine Mall 180-01 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS; INC: ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS; SURVEYORS&PLANNERS December 22, 1997 Mr. Steve Doherty City of Clearwater Central`Permitting Department Post. Office Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Sunshine Mall Replat Dear Steve-'- Pursuant- to our conversation we are enclosing a check in the amount of $25 for the additional review fee ffor the above referenced plat. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning. . this project. Thank you?for your assistance. Sincerely, t a R • - a?0 iii is : t •s'h+ ? J 3 ? - 9 9? Richard D: Harris, P.E': Senior Project Manager 1 ' :es LAd0herty.`1 Encl: cc; File 180_01.180 2639 MCCORMICK DRIVE' • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 (813) 724-8422 • FAX (813) 724-8606 , - aa?a" a araraaa a-&I to ?1%1 C,1r 1/Y11J1• 1 100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 34616 PHONE: 562-4567; FAX: 562-4576 INSPECTION LINE: 562-4580 APPLICATION FOR SUBOMSION P1 AT RFVII=w .......:?1 (GUN I INUtU UN NtA 1 PAGE) YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO A PARKS AND RECREATION FEE:: City Code or Ordinances, Secs. 54.01 - 54..35 requires a parks and recreation impact fee to be paid for all nonresidential projects over 1 acre in size and all residential developments. Has this property compiled with these ordinances? ( YES ) If yes, evlain how and when: Vested due to existing development and use. ASSESSED JUST VALUE OF PROPERTY (ATTACH VERIFICATION): N/A Most recent sales price (attach verification): N/A As of (date): N/A Your Fee for this Plat Review is $ /1+0-019 Please submit that amount with this completed application. The applicant, by filing this application agrees to comply with Chapter 46 and section 36.083 of the City's Land Development Code. SPECIFIC CHAPTER 46 DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PLAT AND PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS ARE ATTACHED FOR YOUR INFORMATION AND COMPLIANCE. Any request for a variance from the regulations set forth in Chapter 46 of the City Code. should be submitted formally in writing to the Central Permitting Department at the same time the preliminary plat is submitted. The variance request should cat ff%rtn f div the basis for the variance request and all facts relied on by the petitioner. Signature: v dd3 I (Owne of R ord 'tf the application is signed by an individual other than the property owner (e.y. the representative), please attach a statement signed by the property owner authorizing this individual to sign the application. SUBMIT 16 COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH THIS APPLICATION. Signature: CA? Signature: • y?`??a+a. aara ali a a.a.araaa aaa. t.. ?1%1 L11Y 1111 /,;A A It l • 100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 34616 PHONE: 562-4567; FAX: 562-4576 INSPECTION LINE: 562-4580 APPLICATION FOR SUBMISION PLAT REVIEW C rr Y/STATMP: 1200 South Missouri.Avenue Shopping Mall V :: .. .. ,. ...ARIANCES ANO/OR CONU .1QNAC USES:ARE: INVOL VER = EX.. ... Pt A 1N IF ;MORE SPACE REQUIREQ I SE... A T f TAGI PARATE`SHEEn . ::::::::...:::...? I .... _ .... { II.UN I INUtU UN NtA I VAUt) YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO A PARKS AND RECREATION FEE:: City Code or ordinances, Secs. 54.01 - 54..35 requires a parks and recreation impact fee to be paid for all nonresidential projects over 1 acre in size and all residential developments. Has this property compiled with these ordinances? ( YES ) If yes, eplain how and when: Vested-due to existing development and use ASSESSED JUST VALUE OF PROPERTY (ATTACH VERIFICATION): N/A Most recent sales price (attach verification): N/A As of (date): N/A Your Fee for this Plat Review is $ /1+0-00 . Please submit that amount with this completed application. The applicant, by filing this application agrees to comply with Chapter 46 and section 36.083 of the City's Land Development Code. SPECIFIC CHAPTER 46 DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PLAT AND PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS ARE ATTACHED FOR YOUR INFORMATION AND COMPLIANCE. Any request for a variance from the regulations set forth in Chapter 46 of the City Code should be submitted formally in writing to the --I n ...:.a:..» 11__-+mnn+ S++hn comma +ima tha nraliminnrv neat iS submitted. The variance request should Signature: - (Owne of "If the application is signed by an individual other than the property owner (e.g. the representative), please attach a statement signed by the property owner authorizing this individual to sign the application. SUBMIT 16 COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH THIS APPLICATION. Signature: ZLgq(_ Signature: LL O ................. U Central Permitting Department Interoffice Correspondence To: Art Kader, Interim Director, Parks & Recreation; Mike Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer, Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Rick Albee, Environmental Inspector; Jeff Daniels, Interim Fire Marshall; Don McCarty, Senior Design Planner; Steve Doherty, Central Permitting Supervisor. From: Don McCarty, Central Permitting, Senior Design Planner Subject: SUNSHINE MALL Date: April 20, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan and preliminary plat for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings of January 9, 1998 and March 12, 1998 to assure that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRCFI NALSUNSHINEMALL a CITY OF CLEARWATER CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT 100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2ND FLOOR^.__._.-_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34616 PHONE (813)-562-4567 FAR (813) 562-4576 ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT APPLICATION See attached General Commercial and Residential High II?t 1 E AS QUt+ITY COI EI IENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CtAMIF.iPATPN General Commercial and Residential High cn w: nQ a?ni:wnT- See attached SIFORM - ZONING ATLAS AMENOWNT APPLICATION SIGNATURE: DATE: July 15. 1998 E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire REVIEWED Br (Representing Owner) . P JUL-15-98 14:38 From:EFGLD 4042332188 T-92T''0.0008•"Job-499'" IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SDMI JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA WnL DIVISION necording Fee loac Stamps ? --'- INST # 98--000066 ,IAN 5, 1998 9:26AM JOHN TAYLOR, III, MARION JEAN TAYLOR CARTER, AND MARY TAYLOR HANCOCYC., Plaintiffs, vs. THE FUSCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., FLAGLFR STREET ASSOCIATES, a Connecticut General Partnership, and SHAWMLUT BANK CONNECTICUT, N.A:, Defendants, FLAGLER STREET ASSOCIATES, a Connecticut General Partnership, through its general partner LYNN F'USCO, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 95-5694-0-i6 CASE NO. 95-6503-CI-20 (consolidated cases) ooQKrss otary Tax Pd. 8 6 Intangible Tax Pd. *=:!?lnollas County DaputY Cbrk L, N" ` C = 1:M`. TErV E7: 3.7G NAN'E. 5. ?'S JOHN S. TAYLOR, III; MARION JEAN TAYLOR CARTER'. MARY TAYLOR H.ANCOCK; THE FUSCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC.; SHAVVMUT BANK CONNECTICUT, N.A., a National banking association f/kla/ Connecticut National Bank, N.A., Defendants, 0 b ?z .v td L- N ?a cn C Nz r wp %D • 0 JUL-15-98 14:38 From:EFGLD 4042332188 T-92T P.03/08 Job-499 SHAWMn BANK. CONNECTICUT, N.A_, a national banking association, Okla Connecticut National Bank, N.A., n/k/a FLEET NATIONAL BANK, Crossclaim Plaintiff, CASE NO. 95-5694 CI-20 CASE NO. 95-6503 CI-20 (consolidated cases) VS. THE FUSCO N ANAGEMBNT COMPANY OF FLOIUDA, INC., JOHN S. TAYLOR, III, ,t MARION JEAN TAYLOR CARTER; MARY TAYLOR HANCOCK; SUNSHINE MALL n ASSOCIA'T'ES, LTD.; CLEARWATER ASSOCIATED; FLAGLER STREET ASSOCIATES, through its general partner LYNN FUSCO, Ul y z Crosselaim Defendants. ?r r o . H CERTIFICATE O TI E The undersigned Clerk of the Court certifies that she executed and filed a Certificate of Sale in this action on Dec tuber 16. 1997, for the property described herein and that no objections to the sale have been filed within the time allowed for filing objections. The following property located in Pinellas County, Florida, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, was sold to The Clearwater Group, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, whose address is 2026 Powers Ferry Road, #250. Atlanta, GA 30339. WnINESS, KARLEEN F. DeBLAKER, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, and the seal of JUL-15-98 14:39 From:EFGLD - 4042332168 '" T=927''`P.04%08` Jab-499 said Court, at the Courthouse at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Ja u 1998 Date X{ARLEI;N F. DeBLAKER CLE OF T T OURT ` • , `: (Seal) - Deputy Clerk copies to: R, Carlton Ward, Esquire Ronald M. Rosengarten, Esquire Marion Hale, Esquire Jonathan A. Heller, Esquire Joseph R. Park, Esquire Fredrick B. Rushing, Esquire 0 mr ?n too cn c N x y b? 0 r N RCW/te Gen/certti.hat . JUL-15-98 14:39 From:EFGLD 4042332188 T-927 P-05/08 Job-499 ?.::k ;1,; ..r••: ?'. ate ti.: PARCEL r: aei.ng a part of the Southwest one-quarter of section. 15,-Township 29 S., Range 15 E., also a part of the Northwest one;.quarter or section • 72, . Township 29 S. , Range 15 E. , Pinellas County, Florida, aescrLbcd'as 9011ovs: From the Northeast corner of the Northwest one-quarter of said.. section 22, Township 29 S., Range 15 E., also the Southeast corner of the Southwest one-quarter pf said Section 15, 'Township 29 S., Range 15 E., run thence N 89 degrees 030 49" W along the -section line 65.00 feet for the point of beginning, -thence •N _00 •degrQas 15, sgV-9 along the Westetly.right-cf-way of Missoufi Avenue 869.80 'feet, thence N 5 degrees 59+ 39" E along said westerly right-of-way lin$ 156.30 feet, thence N 00 degrees 1S, 59"-E along said westerly right-of-way lire 216.03 teat, thgriCa 14 14 degrees 34, 53" W along said Westerly right-of-uay line 31.05 feet, tiieneo N 3,0 Aegrees 3Z' 27" W along said Westerly right- of-Way line 37.91 feet to the southerly right--of-way line of Druid Road, thence N 89 degrees 03, S2" W along said Southerly right- of-way line 416.93 feet, thence S 00-degrees 02, 0411 W 362.88 feet, thence $ 52 degrees 07, 35" W 669.92 feet, thence S 00 degrees. 021 04" W 1478.06 feat, thence N 89 degrees 03+_ 52" W 272.86 feet to the Easterly right-of=Kay of Greenwood Avenue, thence 5 00. degrees 021 04" W along said Easterly right--of-way 333.50 feet to the Section line, thence 5 89 degrees o3? 499' E along said section line 424.73 Peet, thence S 00 degrees 07, 35"E 310.46.feet, thence s 89 degrees 00, 26" E 209.00 feat, thence s 00 degrees 071 35" E 339,13 fee:., thence S 89 degrees 071 3511 E 614.20 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue, thence N 00 degrees 19, 29" W along said Westerly right-•af-gray line 333.22 feet, thence N 37 degrees 11, 30" W along said' Westerly right-or-way line 25.00 feet, thence N 00 degrees 191 29" W along said Westerly right-of-way line 296.29 feet to the point of beginning. Less that tract.deeded to the City of'Clearwater (need Book 814, Pages 49 and 50) as 1•ies witnin trie above described boundary. PARCM 11, - t ea N z I •L A part of the Northwest one-quarter of. Section 22, Township 29 S.; Range 15 E., as described as follows,: _ From the Southeast corner of the Hortheaat one-quarter of the Northwest one-quarter of said Section 22, Township 29 5.,•,_17 Range 15 9., run thence N 00 degrees 191 29" W along the N-S centerline of said section 22, 680.99 feet, thence N 89 de9'rees 07, 35" W 150.00 feet for the point of beginning; thence continue N 89 degrees 071 35" W 514.02 feet, thence 5 00 degrees 07. 35" E 6.90 feet, thence S 89 degrees 451 Old i Z 513.96 feet, ttlence N 00 M s t? n 0 c K } ?a f .? =IBIT A f d 131 . ro nM ty t- N? koO N "C? roK LJ JUL-15-98 14:39 From:EFGLD 4042332188 T-927 P.06/08 Job-499 x'YN LI,AS COUNTY FLA- degrees 1'9' 19" W 1.30 feet•'Gq the'-point of beginn.ing- PARG>rL• pAE a? Begin at-the Northwest corner -of the •NOFtheast on_ e-quarter of the Northwest one-glutrter of S*tion 22, Township x51 S... Ranee 15 E. , and nun thence s 89.degrees 030 49" E along the section line 20.00 feet for the paint of•beoi ring, 'thence contiiauet s ,as • degrees 03' 49" E 434.73 feet, thence 5 .00 degrees 1o' '32" E , -117.54 feet, thence H 8g dngraos 0314su W 4A5.04 feet, thence N • 00' degrees 01v 36" W along the Easterly right-of-vay line of Crarariuaod }Avenue and parallel to the 40 acre line, 117.50 feet to the point of beginning. Q • ro nt4 r _ cn C ? ro ?c ? ro ? r +fl y c, G k3 r eb JUL-15-98 14:40 From:EFGLD TOC."ETIMR with all awards and proceeds of condemnation for the Premises or any part thereof to %'-ic<h Mortgagor is•entitled for (a) any taking of all or any part of the premises by condemnation or exercise of the right of eminent domain, (b)- the alteration of the grade of any street, c; (c); any other injury to or tioczease in the value of the Premises. 4042332188 T-927 P.07/08 Job-499 ? ``..i4' TOGETHER with (1) all the buildings, structures and improvements•of every na,ture•whatsoever now or hereafter situa,ted on tZ+a.r.and, ind (2) all building materials, supplies and <QS-her property. stored or delivered to the site of said premises or at other locations for incorporation into the improvements located or to be located on the Land, and all fixtures, machinery, appliances, equipment and personal Property of every nature whatsoever now or hereafter owned by Mortgagor and located in or on, or attached to, and' used or intended to be used in gonneetion with%or with the operation of, the Land, buildings, structures or other improvements, or in connection with Any conatrucrion being conduced or which may be conducted thereon, and owned by Mortgagor, and all extensions, additions,. improvements, . betterments, renewalS, substitutions and replacements to any•of the foregoing, and all of the right, title and interest''of - Mortgagor in and to such personal property which, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be conclusively deemed fixt=ures and a part of tha raal property oncur:bered hereby (hereinafter the "Improvements") ; the rand and improve.'ments shall hereinafter be collectively called the "premises'" TOGETHER With all leasehold estate, right, title and 3.nterast of mortgagor in and to all leases or subleases coveri.n(j ' the premises or any portion thereof now or hereafter existing or entered into, and all right, title and interest of Mortgagor thereunder, including, without limitation, all cash or security deposits, advance rentals, and deposits or payments of 'similar nature) TOGETFZR with all right, title and interest of Mortgagor in and to all options to purchase or lease the Premises or any portion thereof or interest therein., and any greater estate in thx Premtz.es -owned •or -her-ea•fter wclqu'irec: TOGETHER with all interests, estates or other claims, both in law and in equity, which Mortgagor now has or may hereafter acquire in the premises; TOGETHER with all easements, rights-of-way, sewer rights, water courses, water rights and powers and rights used in connection therewith or as a means c! access thereto, and all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances in any way belonging, relating or appertaining to the Prer_isco and the reverahon or reversions, remainder and remainders, rents issues and profits thereof) TOGETnR with all right, title and interest of Mortgagor in and to any streets and'roads abutting the Prctrisea„ to the center lines thereof and in and to any strirs er gores of-land therein adjacant to the premises. :i ', ,. !< . ,', •_ _ ..' :l••?:;r?: ?,w% it .y,?'f[ 1.:•.'>•:. !i-i;i:'+s•i: ?.,•? 4 ;i.. '.?); ,'S: .1•' ' +': •. • ? T ?.? :f?. ti. •.?..tizf !; ?%1C',.5.'?tF?:y.'1;;.7?;?g2::? O '17 0 t7 tb r x? ?O Nz roK 42 171 r~ V• to w ch E Ln a v+ u a+ zw H a w 934 e? 00'9IS :iMMU 39?tlFl? D9.8is I-1vioi ?0?zs? of aNu isnu aa, 00'4It 3M SKIS d0dd SAHjAStl033 aovoo000 - 010E it SE:OZ:et L66i ?I-c: IN 69ST600E m ' a?Iu 4TgTeix trr paq;aosap Li aeloxd ae{4 01 -za;a= TTaQs ut>u41 atm,s =al atti '?tTnnp;n;puz 1 etm'ATuA.J:J a;,'Eoo ' •pql 'saqu'possy ZTgFt atr?su:tg pug 'ss?g;oOSS1C ?a?erxxeaT3 'xa? zotxrs uuar tto;.?vst 'Xaaouva xolXvZ AjVX 'ZII %oTAfeZ •S ugoL •uoT,4wodxoo pasta aqo ?/X/;''Xuudmoo quecaebeu+ ?s ass g,f ?3` .=.r 14pTaoTA 20 4uudmcp ;?&ibtabhoezvR-couna •4141 oa• saaox ZTstgs 1,aobu&.2oRo1 =aq oux - • s:;uietear%oadua= oq:? ;o aouuaaqu-Fura puv ' uo Fq*nx4f;uom at ,4 Put sosTavag • gq; va buTu ac3 sgt1a=az5a satgio pets •146suaa;T 's-,TsR od 'sgovaquoo ITT =pun Pere u; ta=r4Ta;aoi .tA .ueT??TVtXa'4 •tpvaiq. a f,t:tatlam -4nG1MT ? *'tQVUSTs%v ST Zsa.*0•3u; . : , . •.'t;?tts ?uagxa at;? off) • ?saxa?u? s,.?obe??oH ?u 7rea .et?'It'? ?i3H???0.L 00TS :(uu3G,31'10 X?3H? ? 0 at$ ` ? q + 4?2'??i J T BNIQ?30J? am sP1i43d0 d 46$-M ;0 o 2c:E5=0t L661-9t-at ltld yISt60DE 04'Ojs 'iHnONO 39`bW 00 Olt :10101 RGIMrI 133 911M IMILIG ? ]MI 53Ii?o2ld It98•-ft9tt 9orooooo - ME tt 6L:a::Ot 3fiT-St-?t led USt6UE :w= ,sac s ` • tF?? m imm 66V-qor 90/80'd RG-i ealzeezvok md3:W01d OV:kl 96-51-inr Legal Description Exhibit A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST. AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST. PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAME ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST. PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID SOUTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER BEING S89"03'29'E. (BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION) 2655.24 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE N89°03'29'W. ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. SAME ALSO BEING THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22. FOR 65.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSOURI AVENUE SOUTH (STATE ROAD S-595-A). SAME ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSOURI AVENUE SOUTH, THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: (1)THENCE NOO°15'59'E. ALONG A LINE 65.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. FOR 868.70 FEET: (2) THENCE N05°59'39'E. FOR 150.30 FEET: (3)THENCE N00°15'59"E. ALONG A LINE 50.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. FOR 217.08 FEET: (4) THENCE N14039'52"W, FOR 31.05 FEET; (5) THENCE N39°32'26"W, FOR 38.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRUID ROAD; THENCE N89.01'280W, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRUID ROAD. SAME ALSO BEING A LINE 33.00 FEET SOUTH OF. AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, FOR 416.71 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRUID ROAD. SOO°02'04"W. FOR 363.23 FEET: THENCE S52°07'350W. FOR 669.92 FEET: THENCE SOO°02'04"W. FOR 178.06 FEET: THENCE N89°03'520W. FOR 183.26 FEET TO REFERENCE POINT "A'• THENCE S21°46'30'W, FOR 143.36 FEET: THENCE S17°48'00"W, FOR 93.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF MTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE: THENCE SOO°09'19'W. ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE SAME ALSO BEING A LINE 40.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, FOR 109.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. SAME ALSO BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST. PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE N89°03'290W. CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, SAME ALSO BEING SAID NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22. FOR 20.00 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22. SOO°02'05"E. CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE. SANE ALSO BEING A LINE 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, FOR 117.49 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE. S89.03'29"E. FOR 435.17 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION. RESPECTIVELY, OF SUNSHINE TERRACE AS RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK 74. PAGE 9 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA. THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES; (1) THENCE SOO°10'32"E. FOR 195.60 FEET: (2) THENCE S89003'49'E. FOR 209.00 FEET; (3) THENCE SOO°10'32'E. FOR 336.98 FEET: THENCE S89°07'35'E. FOR 1.39 FEET: THENCE SOO,07'35'E. FOR 6.90 FEET: THENCE S89°45'010E,. FOR 513.96 FEET: THENCE NOO°.19'29"W. FOR 1.30 FEET; THENCE S89°07'35'E. FOR 99.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSOURI AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSOURI AVENUE SOUTH. THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: (1) THENCE NOO°19'29'W. ALONG A LINE 50.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF AFORESAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22. FOR 332.29 FEET; (2) THENCE N37°11'41"W. FOR 25.00 FEET; (3) THENCE NOO°19'29'W. ALONG A LINE 65.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22. FOR 296.29 FEET; (4) POINT EAST OF THENCE BOUNDARY LINE 5 OF T E SOUTHWEST 1/4 NE OF 65SECTION ETI 5 , WEST FOR NDI PARALLEL O F ETTO AFORESAID BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 1.537.229 SQUARE FEET OR 35.290 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH; COMMENCE AT AFORESAID REFERENCE POINT 'A"; THENCE N89°03'52"W. FOR 10.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N89°03'52'W. FOR 70.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE; THENCE SOO°09'19"W. ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE SAME ALSO BEING A LINE 40.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH AFORESAID WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. FOR 190.57 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST TE. FOR M 139190 FEET TO GREENWOOD POINT AVENUE OF ING BEGINNING CONTAINING THENCE N21°46'30 6 .41 3 SQUARE FEET OR 0.147 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. TOTAL AREA 1.543.642 SQUARE FEET OR 35.437 ACRES. MORE OR LESS PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO MPD ZONING On March 5, 1998, the City of Clearwater City Commission passed Ordinance 6231-98, amending the City's zoning atlas for the property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Druid Road and Missouri Avenue, commonly known as the former Sunshine Mall property. specifically, the City Commission approved a zoning change on the 35 acre parcel from Commercial Center (CC) and Multi-Family Residential "Twenty-Eight" (RM-28) to Master Plan Development. In conjunction with the Master Plan Development zoning district, the City approved a Concept Plan showing the land uses and development standards for the property. The Applicant proposes in this application to amend the approved zoning Concept Plan to change an area previously reserved for commercial development to multifamily uses. (Multiple copies of the proposed concept plan were provided to the City under separate cover to Mr. Lorenzo Aghemo by the Applicant's engineer, Florida Design Consultants, Inc.) The City previously approved several commercial parcels along Missouri Avenue. The Applicant is proposing to change two of these previously approved commercial parcels to multifamily. (The two parcels were previously described as, Parcels 5 and 5A, and were located adjacent to Missouri Avenue, north of the primary entrance drive.) The proposed concept plan shows this area (approximately two acres in size) as part of the multifamily development. This proposed change also results in the reconfiguration of residential parcel numbers 7 and 8, and reconfiguration of the remaining retail parcels located north of the main entrance feature to the subject property. The proposed plan also provides site data for each parcel and development standards for each parcel. To the extent that the approved zoning conditions describe the site data previously approved, then the Applicant hereby requests that the conditions of approval be modified to reflect the current proposed site data. 0163006.01 ,. a ORDINANCE NO. 6231-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF DRUID ROAD AND MISSOURI AVENUE, NORTH OF LAKEVIEW ROAD AND EAST OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, CONSISTING OF A PART OF SECTION 15-29-15, M&B 34.01 AND A PART OF SECTION 22- 29-15, M&B 21.01 & 21.02, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1200 SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE, FROM COMMERCIAL CENTER AND MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "TWENTY- EIGHT' (28) TO MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows: Property Zoning District See Exhibit A attached. (Z98-02) From: Commercial Center & Multiple Family Residential "Twenty-eight" (CC and RM 28) To: Master Planned Development (MPD) Section 2. The Central Permitting Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING February 5, 1998, 1998 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED March 5, 1 Garvey, Mayor-Comm Approved as to form: Attest: fQ, Leslie K. Dougall-Side st. City Attorney, Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Y hereby 4 that this is a true and po mAA oapy o the on rirw as it apppears in the file ofe City of Clean ter. Witness my liand,'and affici/alc of the of C auwatee 7llis,, ..'ay of ' 1 f Deputy Cib, CI Ordinance No. 6231-98 `f EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being a part of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 15, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, also a part of the Northwest one-quarter of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, described as follows: From the Northeast comer of the Northwest one-quarter of said Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, also the Southeast comer of the Southwest one-quarter of said Section 15, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, run thence North 89°03'49" West along the section line 65.00 feet for the Point of Beginning; thence North 00°15'59" East along the Westerly right-of-way of Missouri.Avenue 869.80 feet; thence North 5°59'39" East along said Westerly right-of-way line 150.30 feet; thence North 00°15'59" East along said Westerly right- of-way line 216.03 feet; thence North 14°39'53" West along said Westerly right-of-way line 31.05 feet; thence North 39°32'27" West along said Westerly right-of-way line 37.91 feet to the Southerly right-of-way line of Druid Road; thence North 89°03'52" West along said Southerly right-of-way line 416.93 feet; thence South 00°02'04" West 362.88 feet; thence South 52007'35" West 669.92 feet; thence South 00°02'04" West 178.06 feet; thence North 89°03'52" West 272.86 feet to the Easterly right-of-way of Greenwood Avenue; thence South 00°02'04" West along said Easterly right-of-way line 333.50 feet to the section line; thence South 89°03'49" East along said section line 424.73 feet; thence South 00°07'35" East 310.46 feet; thence South 89°00'35" East 209.00 feet; thence South 00°07'35" East 339.13 feet; thence South 89°07'35" East 614.02 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue; thence North 00°19'29" West along said Westerly right-of-way line 333.22 feet; thence North 37°11'30" West along said Westerly right-of-way line 25.00 feet; thence North 00°19'29" West along said Westerly right-of-way line 296.29 feet to the Point of Beginning. LESS that Tract deeded to the City of Clearwater (Deed Book 834, Pages 49 and 50) as lies within the above-described boundary. AND A rectangular tract beginning at the Northwest comer of the intersection of Lakeview Road and South Missouri Avenue in Clearwater, Florida, running thence 650.99 feet in a Northerly direction parallel with Missouri Avenue; running thence 100 feet parallel with Lakeview Road; running thence 650.99 feet in a Southerly direction parallel with Missouri Avenue; and running thence 100 feet in an Easterly direction parallel to Lakeview Road to the 'point or place of beginning, said property being located in Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, LESS the North 175.0 feet of the South 470.99 feet of the East 150.0 feet of the Northeast % of the Northwest % of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, LESS the Easterly 50.0 feet thereof for the right- of-way of Missouri Avenue. Ordinance No. 6231-98 • _..?. ' emearwater item City Commission Oworksession Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: .3.5 - 1$ SUB J ECT/RECOMMENDATION: Authorize local contributions to support the development of Tuscany apartments by Construction under the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. ???,, © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.- g ?t ?tP SUMMARY: CED Construction is proposing to develop 239 apartments on the former Sunshine Mall Property for elderly household under the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program Administered by the Florida Housing Finance Agency. The Federally funded and State administered housing tax credit program is an extremely competitive funding process. Successful applicants under this program are those that are able to show adequate local support for their proposed development. The State application deadline is March 10, 1998. They will announce the successful applicants in September 1998. The development will supply affordable rental housing to income eligible elderly households in Clearwater. A marketing study conducted Pardue, Heid, Church, Smith, and Waller documents 1,689 elderly households in Clearwater paying more than 35% of their income for rent. These households are the primary market for this new affordable rental housing. The development will result in a substantial improvement in assessed valuation for this property. We anticipate assessed values to increase from $2,550,000 to $18,360,000. The City of Clearwater is proposing the following local contribution as our support of this development. Rent Subsidy • Rental Assistance from the general fund equal to $537,792.28 Forgone Revenue Contributions • Solid Waste fee discounts $48,972.00 • Building Permit and Plan Review fee waiver $57,814.60 In-kind Contributions • Donation of fill dirt $37,500.00 Expenditure Contributions - will be funded in Fiscal Year 1998-99 Capital Improvement Budget • Construction of an on site storm water retention $40,000.00 • Construction of a turning lane on Druid Road $20,000.00 Reviewed by Originating Dept Costs Legal V Info Srvc NA Administration Total $847,792.28 Bud et g Purchasing A Public Works DCM/ACM NA User Dept. Funding Source: Current FY -0- CI $60,000 Risk Mgmt NA Other Attachments OP Other $787,792-28 Submitted by: City Manager OX None A ro riation Code. Printed on recycildia w Rev. 2199 BACKGROUND (continued) • • Ig Loans $250,000 at 1 % interest only payments for 20 years, balloon repayment at the end of the term • Net Present Value of the below market rate and terms is $172;411.72 Total of local contributions $914,490.55 The recommendations for these contributions are consistent with Clearwater's Local Housing Assistance Program enacted by Ordinance number 5410-93, July 1, 1993. These contributions represent a continuation of Clearwater's support for the development of affordable housing and are our first support for elderly housing under the Local Housing Assistance Program. The Rent Subsidy from the General Fund will is based on the fees collected from the gas and electric utility Franchise Fees and the Storm Water Utility fee collected from the 239 apartments over 20 years. The Solid Waste fee discounts are: • waiver of the monthly rental fee for 12, thirty yard construction roll-off containers for the 24 month period of construction • a 20% discount on roll-off pulls during construction, not to exceed 500 pulls • a 10% discount for two compactor rentals for 120 months, and • a 10% discount on up to 8 compactor pulls per month for 120 months The fill dirt is from existing City stock piles. We will donate 6,000 cubic yards which have a market value of $6,25 per yard. City of Clearwater Tuscany Apartments Project Fiscal Impact Model Years Year 1 2 thru I9 vo,.. Incremental revenues per Fishkind Fiscal Impact Model ' 587,525 4,$97,977 1,129,618 16 615 020 f Gas Fund estimated incremental profit (including General Fund divi 43,222 777,997 43,222 , , 864 441 Grant revenue for funding of $250,000 loan 250 000 , Total Revenues , 880,747 16,675,975 1,172,740 250,000 17,729,461 1 F.rn n i , ,r Incremental cost of services per Fishkind Fiscal Impact Model " 574,318 14,563,085 1,104,127 16,241.530 Cit Contributions Rental Assistance from General Fund F` f? 10,172 17$,010 2 963 191 145 Rental Assistance from General Fund 9,910 173,425 , 2,886 , 186 221 Rental Assistance from General Fund 8,566 149,730 2,143 , 160 429 Solid waste fee discounts 18,180 30,792 , 48 972 Building ermit and plan review fee waiver 57,815 , Donation of fill dirt 37,500 57,815 7 Construction of on-site storm water retention 40 000 ,5 00 Construction of turning lane on Druid Road , 20 000 40,000 Loan at 1% interest , 250 000 20,000 , 260,000 Totals enditures 1,026,4611 15,095,042 1,112,119 17233,613 Net project income / (deficit) before interest 145,704 580,933 60,620 495,849 Interest eardings / (cost) on project income / (deficit) balance (8,014) 109,619 26,605 127,210 Net project income / (deficit) (153,718)1 690,552 86,225 623,059 Cumulative project income / (deficit) (153,718) 636,834 623,059 ' 'Inflation rate" of 4.3% per year based on average increase in city tax revenues over past 10 years . *"Inflation rate" of 4.3% per year based on average increase in City governmental expenditures (excluding Capital Outlay) over past IQ years. Internal Rate of Return on Project Cash Flows 17.046 Prepared by Finance Department 2/27/98 Page 1 U - Interoffice Correspondence Sheet To: Rick Hedrick, Assistant City Manager From: Alan J. Ferri, Clearwater Housing and Urban Development Director CC: Michael J. Roberto, City Manager ` Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager Bob Keller, Assistant City Manager Date: March 4, 1998 RE: Federal Tax Credit Program Structure The federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program is the major national incentive program for private sector developers to produce affordable rental housing. Congress created the program as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Under this act each state receives an annual allocation of tax credits equal to $1.25 per each individual residing in the state. States in tum allocate these credits to private sector developers for housing developments. This program has become the single largest national resource for the development of multifamily housing in the United States. Each state develops application and allocation procedures for their administration of this program in addition to the federal rules. For the past several years the Florida program has been weighted in favor of family developments over elderly developments. This year, however, Florida allocation guidelines have changed to allow elderly oriented complexes to effectively compete for a tax credit allocation. When the state awards a developer tax credits they have 28 months to complete their development. Developers generally syndicate their projects to sell the tax credits to limited partners. Because the tax credits are distributed to the developer over a ten year period the sale of the credits to the limited partners is usually for a discounted net present value of the tax credit cash flow. Depending upon long term interest rates this discount could be anywhere from 20% to 30% of the face value of the tax credits. Developers use the proceeds of the syndication sale to finance part of the development costs. Essentially they are using the sale of the tax credits to increase the equity financing of the development and reduce the portion that is debt financed. By reducing the portion of the development that is debt financed developers are able to charge tenants lower rents. The rents they charge must be affordable to households at 60% of median income and at 35% of median income adjusted for their household size. The federal govemment defines affordable rent as no more than 30% of a household's gross income including an allowance for utility expenses. If a development fails to meet this affordability criteria at any time during the first 15 years the IRS will revoke any remaining tax credits and require repayments of previously granted credits plus interest and a substantial penalty. ' • LL 0 r w,:aF.ew?v.ps? I T WV 0lqwO ire ?r' U Interoffice Correspondence Sheet To: Mayor and Commissioners From: Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk CC: Michael J. Roberto, City Manager Rick Hedrick, Assistant City Manager Date: March 4, 1998 RE: Additional Information regarding Sunshine Mall Redevelopment The following additional information regarding the proposed redevelopment of Sunshine Mall is being provided: 1) Market Study for Tuscany Apartments (CED) - some of you have already picked this up. 2) Memorandum explaining the tax credit program 3) Material provided by Ed Armstrong regarding Intemaciona) Realty, Inc., the developers of the market apartments. If you have any questions, please call Rick Hedrick or Alan Ferri. Wa HAve Some Ouesnows Fon You- * Is your property 98% collected by the 5th of each month and 99.5% collected by the dosing of the month? ® Is your property meeting an average occupancy of at least 97% for the month? ® Do you have a business plan for your property that includes a, detailed, twelve month budget? 6 Is our property meeting/exceeding the above IS et? ® Are you satisfied with the explanations you receive for budget variances? • Are you satisfied with the level of expenses for Your property? 6 Are 99% of your maintenance work orders cleaned within 24 hours of receipt? • Are, you 100% happy with the results of your current property management efforts? • Has the overall appearance of your property Improved over the last year exclusive of major p rty Improvements? If th er to any of these questions Is 'no," you should contact us.at Intemacional Realty. Inc. because our management process will generate these results! INTERNACIONAL -qfflFz 'REALTY, INC. 0 m r Z#5 D r REALTY, INC. Phone:210,525*8788 Fax: 210.525-8780 INTERNACIONAL I nternacional Realty, Inc. was founded in 1994 to pri- marily perform third party property management ser- vices for the apartment Industry. The two principals and owners of the company each have at least twenty years experience in the apartment Industry, and fifteen years and seven years experience, respectively. In San Antonio. The company also Intends to limit the number of properties to be managed so as to be consistent with Its philosophy of "hands on man- agement by the owners." in other words, the company Aet take on more than can be handled by the own- mselves. In addition to property management services. the com- pany also provides "due diligence" services for acqui- sitions and supervises renovations and rehabs. AS the company will not take on more than can be handled by the owners themselves !! is Our compensation is very com- petitive In the market place and can be structured in a number of ways. We do not hesitate to tie our com- pensation to our performance and the property's performance.!! - ZO YEARS EXPERIENCE - CUSTOM MANAGEMENT MEET THE OWNERS Hugh Caraway Chief Executive Officer Internacional Realty, Inc. Prior to forming Internacional Realty, Inc., Mr. Car, way spent ten years as a Senior Partner with Propert Company of America, a nationwide real estate deve opment and management firm. Prior to that, he sper live years as a partner with Lincoln Property Company He has been Involved in the development. acquisitior and management of over 20,000 apartment units. Be fore entering the real estate business, he was a Certi fled Public Accountant in public accounting with Arthu Andersen & Company, and Kenneth Leventhal & Com pany. Mr. Caraway graduated from Louisiana Tech Uni varsity in 1970 after serving a tour in the U.S. Navy. For each property Internacional Realt Inc re ares -FLEXIBLE COMPENSATION Irma Caraway , y, . p p President a business and marketing plan which is specifically Internacional Realty, Inc. designed to achieve your objectives and incorporates Prior to forming Internacional Realty, Inc., Mrs. Cara a detailed line item budget for rents and expenses. This -GUARANTEED RESULTS way spent ten years with Propetty Company of Americ, b t Is strictly adhered to in order to provide you where she rose from a District Property Manager it waximum results. Our expertise In property man- Director of Property Management responsible for ul agement equips us with a pro-active management style. to 5,500 units in Austin, San Antonio, Houston, Chi This enables us to accurately project and adjust to cago, Detroit and Las Vegas. Prior to joining Propert± changes In the market place. We utilize a totally com- Company of America she was with Lincoln Propertl puterized rental collection and accounting system which The company is also experienced in reporting require- Company for four years. Mrs. Caraway started her ca Is maintained onsite. This allows you to have accurate, ments and maintenance of files associated with vari- reer in property management in 1975. She has workec up to the minute information which, combined with our ous governmental agencies such as: onsite as a leasing agent, assistant manager and resi collection procedures, entitles you to receive financial RTC Affordable Housing dent manager as she rose through the ranks. Mrs. Cara- statements for the prior month and your distributions -Tax Credit Properties way is bilingual in Spanish, has accredited Residen, for the current month, no later than the 5th of each -Housing Bond Properties Manager designation and is a licensed Real Estate Agen- month. In the State of Texas. "F r NZI a HUGH L. CARAWAY, JR. 1970 Graduated in accounting from Louisiana Tech University Joined the Dallas office of Arthur Andersen & Co. 1972 Became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas Promoted to Senior Auditor at Arthur Andersen & Co. 1974 Promoted to Audit Manager at Arthur Andersen & Co. 1975 Co-founded the public accounting firm of Ankeney & Caraway in Dallas, Texas 1977 Became a principal with Kenneth Leventhal & Co. following a merger with Ankeney & Caraway 1979 Joined the Southwest Region of Lincoln Property Company, headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as Chief Financial Officer 1982 Became a partner in the Southwest Region of Lincoln Property Company 1984 A founding partner of Property Company of America 1986 Became a senior partner with Property Company of America 1990 Relocated to Houston, Texas, as Senior Partner responsible for all operations in South Texas 1993 Co-founded the firm of Intemacional Realty, Inc. headquartered in San Antonio, Texas INTERNACIONAL4W-ALTY, INC. Listing of Apartment Developments in which Hugh L. Caraway Jr. has supervised LQCATIQN / PROJECT NAME # of Units 1 The Park at Wells Branch 304 2 Barton's Lodge 600 3 Park Place 588 4 Promontory Pointe 252 5 Austin Trail 150 6 Mission Hills 200 7 Deerfield 304 2,398 San Antonio. Texas 1 The Fountainhead 688 2 The Hollows 432 3 The Villages 736 4 Lincoln Green 680 5 The Lodge 384 6 Mill Bridge 96 7 La Calera 160 3,176 Houston. Texas 1 Eagle Creek 456 2 Lakes at 610 276 3 Depot North 488 1,220 • , , , c:1123w1samplelhugh\list-apt.wk4 INTERNACI®N*REALTY, .INC. Listing of Apartment Developments in which Hugh L. Caraway Jr. has supervised L CCATICN / PROJECT NAME #Sf Units Dallas. Texas 1 Preston Village 326 2 Lakeside Village 327 3 Preston Bend 255 4 Williamsburg 115 1,023 Irvine California The Charter 403 Nashville Tennessee 1 Brixworth 215 2 The Lakes 544 3 Windsor Park 232 991 Atlanta. Georgia 1 Trolly Square 270 Z Brixworth 271 3 Femwood 120 4 Brookwood Valley 240 5 Chastain Park 110 6 Ivy Chase 216 1,227 c:\123w\sample\hugh\list-apt.wk4 INTERNACIOIV/EAL.TY, INC. Listing of Apartment Developments in which Hugh L. Caraway Jr. has supervised Tulsa Oklahoma 1 Waterford 344 2 Greenbriar 120 3 West Port 682 4 Southem Slope 142 1,288 Kansas Citv Missouri 1 Pebblebrook 267 2 Peppertree 170 3 Fountainhead 112 549 hC ica ao. Illinois 1 Lakes of Schaumburg 428 2 The Pointe 312 740 Detroit, Michigan The Remington 396 c:1123w\samplelhughllist apt.wk4 INTERNACIONAIVEALTYs INC. Listing of Apartment Developments in which Hugh L. Caraway Jr. has supervised Denver. Colorado 1 The Parliament 414 2 The Enclave 156 570 Oklahoma City. Oklahoma 1 The Invitational 344 2 Stone Brook 360 3 The Hunt 216 4 Quail Run 196 1,116 Philadelphia. Pennsylvania Polo Run 248 Washinaton. DC Metro 1 The Heritage 491 2 The Wyndham 492 3 The Estates 208 1,191 • c:\123w\sampie\hug h\iist-apt.wk4 ' INTERNACIONADREALTY, INC. • Listing of Apartment Developments in which Hugh L. Caraway Jr. has supervised The Wellington 192 Pelican Sound 379 1 Port Royale 1 379 2 Port Royale 11 161 540 GRAND TOTAL NEW DEVELOPMENT 17,647 Developed under Intemacional Realty, Inc. c:1123w1samplelhugh\list apt.wk4 INTERNACIONAWEALTY, INC. Listing of Apartment Renovations in which Hugh L. Caraway Jr. has supervised ?OrAT10N i PROJECT NAME # of Units 1 The Park at Woodlake 564 2 Oakbrook 222 3 Presidio West 400 4 Fall Lake 124 5 Timbers of Northborough 270 6 Arrowood 304 7 Summertree Park 228 2,112 1 Oaks of Westlake 268 2 Perrin Crest 200 3 The Seville 200 4 Amberton 280 5 Timber Ridge 168 1,116 1 Sundance 232 2 Pheasant Run 220 452 GRAND TOTAL RENOVATIONS 3,680 c:\123w\sample\hugh\list-ren.wk4 0 I RMA CARAWAY 0 1975 Started her career in multi-family residential management as a leasing agent for A.C. Lewis Realty in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. She implemented a marketing and advertising program in addition to handling the onsite lease up for the Raintree Apartments (120 unit project). 1976 Promoted to Assistant Resident Manager where she handled the collections, payables and onsite accounting. 1977 Promoted to Resident Manager and managed two properties simultaneously totalling 224 units. 1978 Relocated to Atlanta, Georgia, with McKinney Management as Assistant Manager of a 565 unit property where she handled the collections, payables, resident relations, renewal program, etc. 1980 Relocated to Houston, Texas, with Lincoln Property Company as Resident Manager of a 452 unit property. She handled all phases of the onsite management including budget administration, resident renewal programs, and supervisor of leasing and marketing. 1982 Promoted to Property Manager over four properties totalling 890 units where she managed the consolidation of four properties (same general location) which had previously been run separately. All four offices were combined into one office with a 50% reduction in the management staff and one-third reduction of the maintenance staff. 1984 Promoted to District Property Manager where she was responsible for 2,300 units that totalled nine properties. One 276 unit property was under construc- tion and she developed the marketing and advertising program for lease up. 1985 Relocated to Austin, Texas with Property Company of America as Regional Property Manager with responsibility for up to 2,200 units totalling seven properties. During this period she handleO the lease up of six properties and the renovation and re-leasing of one property. She also supervised the reporting and guidelines for managing properties financed with housing bonds. 1988 Promoted to Director of Property Management where she was responsible for upwards to 5,500 units in Austin, San Antonio and Houston, Texas; Chicago, Illinois; Detroit, Michigan; and Las Vegas, Nevada. During this period of time she was responsible for. 1. Supervising all onsite functions including new construction lease ups and marketing strategies; 2. Directing and supervising the budgeting process and cash flow planning; IRMA CARAWAY Page Two 3. Developing a policy and procedures manual; 4. Supervising due diligence for the acquisition of approximately fourteen properties; 5. Developing a system to monitor and report relative to the requirements of the RTC Affordable Housing Program; and 6. Supervising the renovation and re-leasing of a 564 unit 25 year old property. 1993 Co-founded the firm of Intemacional Realty. Inc. with her husband Hugh Caraway where as President she is responsible for all property management matters and assists in the design and development of new properties. 7:Z- o ? °Glarwater Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim.Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. . DRUINALSUNSHINEMALL Clearwater U Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRUINALSUNSHINEMALL LA. earwater Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste .Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALI, which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRUINALSUNSHINEMALL LA. rwater U To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect;,Debbie :Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. 'Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in. a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. DRCFINALSUNSHINEMALL °?Cl:arwater Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: ..:BobTerkins, Engineer.Il;•Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; :Mike Gust; Engineering, Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. DRCFINALSUNSHINEMALL If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. Clearwater U To: • Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation;.Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. 8 DRUINALSUNSHINEMALL "Clearwater Planning and Development Services Interoffice Correspondence To: Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect, Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Central Permitting, Planner Subject: Sunshine Mall Address: 1200 Missouri Ave. Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 Please find attached the revised site plan for SUNSHINE MALL which has been submitted by the applicant for certification. Refer to the Summary Notes for the DRC meetings for assurance in assuring that all DRC directed changes have been made to the plan. If you find the site plan acceptable, please initial and date. If you do have an objection and/or recommendation, please comment below or attach your comments in a memo. PLEASE DO NOT MARK PLAN AS IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CERTIFICATION. p . r79 DRCFINALSUNSHINEMALL 12,0o -S - l?1 Ssourf? - To: Rich Baier, Public Works Administrator; Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Planner Subject: Certified Site Plan - Old Sunshine Mall - Amendment to MPD Concept Plan (Courtesy Review) Date: October 2, 1998 Your involvement in the DRC process is greatly appreciated; if you have any questions, please feel free to call Sandra Glatthorn, Planning Administrator. OA.) $? t9k CF6A1,9,6 Lt/ 7-116 'le a'L?7 e i To: Rich Baier, Public Works Administrator; Bob Perkins, Engineer II; Mike Quillen, Assistant Director, Engineering; Robert Guercia, Engineer III; Jeff Daniels Interim, Fire Marshall; James Maglio, Solid Waste Superintendent; Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Clearwater Gas System; Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney; Tim Kurtz, City Landscape Architect; Debbie Richter, Parks and Recreation; Mike Gust, Engineering; Zoning Review (Earl); Certified Site Plan File From: Mark Parry, Planner Subject: Certified Site Plan - Old Sunshine Mall - Amendment to MPD Concept Plan (Courtesy Review) Date: October 2, 1998 Your involvement in the DRC process is greatly appreciated; if you have any questions, please feel free to call Sandra Glatthorn, Planning Administrator. . A t r JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS MARION HALE JAMES W. HUMANN SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ JEFF D. JACKSON FRANK R. LAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON. IR. AMANDA C. KAISER SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON. JR.• MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT DAVID J. OTTINGER F. WALLACE POPE, JR. DONALD P. REED DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL• CHARLES A. SAMARKOS . JOHN A. SCHAEFER CLAY C. SCHUETT PHILIP M. SHASTEEN P.J. STAKELUM JOAN M. VECCHIOLI AMBER WILLIAMS JULIUS J. ZSCHAU *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 39193.98381 September 11, 1998 Mr. Lorenzo Aghemo, Director 0 M City of Clearwater rF tral Permitting Department Cen 100 South Myrtle 1 1998 Clearwater, FL 34618-4748 Re: Application to Amend MPD Concept Plan Dear Mr. Aghemo: As you know, we filed on July 16, 1998, a Zoning Atlas Amendment Application for the Clearwater Group, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of the approximate 35 acre parcel, commonly referred to as the Sunshine Mall property. The purpose of the application was to request approval of minor modifications to the Concept Plan that was approved in conjunction with the Master Planned Development ("MPD°) zoning designation for the property. Subsequent to our July submittal, it was decided that we should place our pending application "on hold" to allow our client additional time to considered other possible changes to the Concept Plan. Our client has concluded its analysis of the proposed project and is now ready to complete the process that has been initiated. With this correspondence, I am enclosing multiple copies of a proposed Concept Plan. The proposed Concept Plan is very similar to the July submittal, with two additions. The enclosed proposed site plan shows adjustments to the building layout for Parcel 8, and shows the access drive to Druid Road as was originally approved. The enclosed Concept Plan maintains our request to convert a small commercial area to multifamily, to reconfigure interior parcel boundaries, etc. The site data tables for each parcel have not changed since our July submittal. CLEARWATER OFFICE 011 CHESTNUT STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33757-1388 TELEPHONE: (813)4$1-1818 TELECOPIER (813) 441-8817 TAMPA OFFICE 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA. FLORIDA 33602-5145 TELEPHONE(813)225-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 223.7116 NAPLES OFFICE 075 SIXTH AVE. S POST OFFICE BOX 1368 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (411) 435-0035 TELECOPIER (941) 435-9442 •? JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Lorenzo Aghemo, Director City of Clearwater September 11, 1998 Page 2 Should you require any additional information from this office, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours EDA/ar cc: Mr. Robert Hatfield Mr. Edward Mazur Mr. Rick Hendrick /-61- E. D. Armstrong 111 Signed in Attoraefe Absence To Prevent Delay In Mailing 0167253.01 E. D. ARMSTRONG III JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH 1. DANIELS MARION HALE JAMES W. HUMANN SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ JEFF D. JACKSON FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. AMANDA C. KAISER SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.- MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT DAVID J. OTTINGER F. WALLACE POPE, JR. DONALD P. REED DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL• CHARLES A. SAMARKOS , JOHN A. SCHAEFER CLAY C. SCHUETT PHILIP M. SHASTEEN P.J. STAKELUM JOAN M. VECCHIOLI AMBER WILLIAMS JULIUS J. ZSCHAU 'OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 39193.98381 September 11, 1998 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Lorenzo Aghemo, Director City of Clearwater VF T Central Permitting Department 100 South Myrtle 1 1 1998 R L Clearwater, FL 34618-4748 Re: Application to Amend MPD Concept Plan Dear Mr. Aghemo: As you know, we filed on July 16, 1998, a Zoning Atlas Amendment Application for the Clearwater Group, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of the approximate 35 acre parcel, commonly referred to as the Sunshine Mall property. The purpose of the application was to request approval of minor modifications to the Concept Plan that was approved in conjunction with the Master Planned Development ("MPD") zoning designation for the property. Subsequent to our July submittal, it was decided that we should place our pending application "on hold" to allow our client additional time to considered other possible changes to the Concept Plan. Our client has concluded its analysis of the proposed project and is now ready to complete the process that has been initiated. With this correspondence, I am enclosing multiple copies of a proposed Concept Plan. The proposed Concept Plan is very similar to the July submittal, with two additions. The enclosed proposed site plan shows adjustments to the building layout for Parcel 8, and shows the access drive to Druid Road as was originally approved. The enclosed Concept Plan maintains our request to convert a small commercial area to multifamily, to reconfigure interior parcel boundaries, etc. The site data tables for each parcel have not changed since our July submittal. CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE NAPLES OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET 975 SIXTH AVE. S POST OFFICE BOX 1368 SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (813) 461.1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602-5145 TELEPHONE: (941) 435-0035 TELECOPIER (813) 441.8617 TELEPHONE (813) 225.2500 TELECOPIER: (941) 435-9992 TELECOPIER (813) 223.7118 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW r-1 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Lorenzo Aghemo, Director City of Clearwater September 11, 1998 Page 2 Should you require any additional information from this office, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours EDA/ar cc: Mr. Robert Hatfield Mr. Edward Mazur Mr. Rick Hendrick 0167253.01 E. D. Armstrong III Q Signed in Attorney's Absence To Prevents Delay In Mailing 00 Feedback on Sunshine Mall Comment Request Earl: Zoning I have no info. on this, was not included in the preliminaries. I assume what was submitted was reviewed earlier Debbie Richter: Parks and Recreation 1) Open Space - The xi in square footage needs to be indicated on the site plan to determine whether an Open Space Dedication Fee is due for an expansion over 50%: If they are certifying only parcel #6 the question is can they use all of the credit for open space fees on this one parcel only (Leslie Dougall-Sides is researching legality). If certification is allowed for parcel #6 only, it does not appear the 2% Open Space fee will be due as parcel 6 includes 363,029 SF and according to the letter Mike Gust provided me, the Mall contained 430,573 SF. I would think that is OK so long as we understand that additional developments will have so pay the Open-Space Fee once 50% of the previous square footage is exceeded.; 2) Recreation Land - The applicant has not provided verifications required to calculate value per square foot. We will need both a copy of the most recent contract for purchase as well as the current year's property tax assessment. These Recreation Land Dedication fees are due prior to certification. The applicant needs to complete the worksheet they were provided and return to the Parks and Recreation Department with the check. Mr. Harris has been provided with this information and at the meeting said he has calculated what the fee would be. Without the information though, this cannot be completed. 3) Recreation Facilities - $200 per unit is due prior to building permit (200 units X $200= $40,000). So they would be ok here until ready to pull the permit. Again, this project cannot be certified until the above items noted are satisfied. Jeff Daniels: Fire Al/f1) Gate width of Greenwood Entrance and Missouri Ave. AC/4_ 2) Island at gate of Greenwood entrance obstructing left turn A11A 3) Turn radius around circle at fountain A//,f 4) Druid Road entrance showing "out" gate only Ap 5) 43 foot turning radius required throughout - / 6) All three story buildings require fire sprinklers - show all siamese connections within 40' of hydrant. --" r Tim Kurtz: Environmental/ Landscape 9tTer must be adjusted as needed and ou r e should be hatched -eni e o site_not shown. 3) nt c e ble. I all Qreensnaee- kot included4fi breaosed-buffl ek3d ular, uuse_area-an-1otalin heck for minimum 5' wide and minimum 100SF on interior landscape areas ust be curbed. equire landscape/tree placement plans must be submitted to and approved by ity Landscape Architect prior to the issuance of any permits. ?[t,45) ? 54, 'd 441-U16-S , F d rn L, o?- Fd,e?, ; *ko., WinAVord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Pagel of 8 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Previous Document Next Document First Hit Native WinW rd View I Back to R l New Help o mage esu ts ue CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION CITY OF CLEARWATER February 2, 1998 Present: J. B. Johnson Vice-Mayor/Commissioner Robert Clark Commissioner Ed Hooper Commissioner Karen Seel Commissioner Michael J. Roberto City Manager Kathy S. Rice Deputy City Manager Bob Keller Assistant City Manager Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Brenda Moses Board Reporter Absent: Rita Garvey Mayor/Commissioner The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall. Employee of the Month Award Mark Tedder, Finance Department, was presented the January 1998 Employee of the Month award. The Commission recessed from 9:03 to 9:08 a.m. to meet as Pension Trustees and Community Redevelopment Agency. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/M99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Page 2 of 8 PUR PURCHASING Bridges Equipment Co., Inc., three 1998 Kubota agricultural tractors, $74, 653.14; funding to be provided under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement ($68,953.14) and current fiscal year operating savings from Parks and Recreation/Parks for vehicle upgrades ($5,700)(GS) Xerox Corp., extension, maintenance of City's Xerox 5090 high speed copier, 1/30/98-2/1/99, est. $27,780 (IM) West Coast Plumbing and Gas, Inc., gas meter change out and loop rebuilding, date of award through 2/28/99, est. $42,000 (GAS) Van Waters and Rogers, extension, chlorine in one ton cylinders and in 150 pound cylinders, award date through 2/3/99, est. $137,505.38 (IN) Declare surplus to City needs, one 1983 Dodge pickup truck, G-272, with 87, 241 miles; authorize disposal to highest bidder (FN) In response to a question regarding Kubota agricultural tractors, Purchasing Manager George McKibben said they are replacements. In response to a question regarding the extension of the Xerox maintenance contract, Mr. McKibben said the figures have decreased slightly over last year. He explained the estimate is based on the number of copies made. In response to a question regarding the dodge truck formerly utilized by the Fire Department, Mr. McKibben said he will research for what purpose the truck had previously been used. MR MARINE First Reading Ord. #6232-98 - Amending Ch. 33, Sec. 33.067, relating to waterways and vessels, to amend defined areas for speed restrictions of vessels (extending wake zone in Clearwater Pass Channel by approx. 350 yards west of Clearwater Pass Bridge, to a point marked by Clearwater Pass Light 6) By extending the wake zone, staff feels vessels anchored and using the beach on the north side of Clearwater pass will be protected from wakes by passing vessels. Approval of this request would locate the wake zone approximately 900 yards west of the Clearwater Pass Bridge. This request was reviewed and approval recommended by the Marine Advisory Board. The Florida Marine Patrol has advised the City the extension of the wake zone will be approved if submitted. If the ordinance is passed, the State will send an amendment to the City permit. The U. S. Coast Guard has advised the City they have no objection to the extension of the wake zone and the placement of the wake zone signs on Clearwater Pass Light 6. All other existing City wake zones remain unchanged. A question was raised regarding minimum wake zones posted only in certain residential areas. Harbormaster Bill Held said the current wake zones have been in effect for 20 - 25 years. A recommendation previously made to the City Commission regarding minimum wake zones in other residential areas was denied. In response to a question regarding resident sentiment, Mr. Held said http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Page 3 of 8 some residents did not want wake zones in the channel. PW PUBLIC WORKS 1998 Underdrain Contract, Overstreet Paving Company, $731,617.70 This project proposed to replace deteriorated underdrain systems along various City roadways. Underdrain pipe drainage systems are constructed below roadways to lower the normal or seasonal high groundwater table to an elevation below the roadway base to prevent groundwater from infiltrating and eroding roadway base. Protection of the roadway base materials extends the life of the roadway pavement systems and lowers the life cycle cost of road maintenance. The proposed work includes 32 City streets. The project will start on or about March 1, 1998, and be completed within 250 days. In response to a question regarding the City's methods of notifying residents in advance of underdrain work, Public Works Administrator Rich Baier said door hangars are placed on residents' doors two weeks prior to the scheduled work date. He said people do not always watch all C-View TV program therefore door hangars are the preferred notification method. In response to a question regarding replacement of newer pipes in newer neighborhoods, Mr. Baier said those pipes do not meet current City specifications. In response to a question regarding problems with elaborate mailboxes in rights-of-way, Mr. Baier said contractors are required to repair damaged sprinklers and re-sod yards. He was unsure about repair of mailboxes. He noted elaborate mailboxes can be permitted on streets with Type F curb and gutter. CP CENTRAL PERMITTING Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6231-98 - Rezoning to MPD for property (Sunshine Mall) located on S corner of Druid Rd., W of Missouri Ave., approx. 640'N of Lakeview Rd., and E of Greenwood Ave., Sec. 15-29- 15, M&B 34.01 and Sec. 22-29-15, M&B 21.01 & 21.02; approve concept plan & refer final site plan to DRC for approval & certification (Mary Taylor Hancock; Jean Taylor Carter & John S. Taylor III, Z98-02) Applicants are requesting a zoning change for the Sunshine Mall property, at <W 1200 10? South 4 Missouri 00, Avenue on the southwest corner of the Druid Road and 4 Missouri W E Avenue, north of Lakeview Road and east of Greenwood Avenue. They propose to rezone the property and to replat it into apartment units and commercial uses. Parcels I - 5C will be used for commercial uses and Parcels 6 and 7 for residential uses. The rezoning will permit 608 apartment units if rezoned MPD (Master Planned development District.) The property is presently zoned CC (Commercial Center) and RM- 28 (Multiple Family Residential "Twenty-Eight") with compatible land use plan classifications of Commercial General and Residential High respectively. No land use plan amendment will be involved in the rezoning request. All land assigned the proposed zoning district requires a concept plan be approved by the City Commission. It includes the conceptual layout for apartment buildings, perimeter landscaping buffers for the entire site, and the existing driveways for access. The total land area for the site is 35.4 acres. Twenty-five acres or more are required to establish a new MPD district. This site exceeds 25 acres in area requiring review and approval by the City Commission of the associated site plan simultaneously http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/HRL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Page 4 of 8 with this request. The proposed development will involve substantial improvements at the site including water, sewer, drainage facilities, roads, and parking facilities to be installed to City standards and in a manner consistent with the approved final site plan. The proposed development will be consistent with an approved site plan that has not been submitted for certification, and that will be required to include: 1) a landscaping plan; 2) a lighting plan; 3) a solid waste system; 4) a parking layout relative to the proposed development; 5) a traffic circulation plan; and 6) internal circulation points of access and cross-access. Density requirements will be met at the permitted density of 24 units per acre. Parcel #7 will be used for construction of 408 elderly apartment units. Parcel #6 will be used for construction of 200 general apartment units. The commercial facilities will be on the east side of the subject properties. Staff is working with the applicants to prepare a traffic impact study to determine peak hour levels of service in accordance with the concurrence management program and potential roadway improvements. Staff is reviewing landscape concepts and existing drainage issues. The rezoning request is consistent with the surrounding land use patterns and in character with the neighborhood, considering the existing the existing multiple family residential facilities and community-oriented retail uses in the area. The project will contribute positively to redevelopment of the area. Interim Central Permitting Director Jeff Kronschnabl said the rezoning to master plan development for the property at the Sunshine Mall involves redevelopment that does not require a land use amendment. Central Permitting Senior Planner Sandy Glatthorn said it is a mixed used development involving 3 phases over a 5-year period. The concept plan outlines the proposed uses on the site, proposed locations, gross floor areas of buildings, proposed maximum height of buildings, general location and number of parking spaces, building setbacks, perimeter buffering and lighting. Approval of the concept plan would allow the applicant to proceed with a detailed final site plan for technical staff review. In response to a question, Ms. Glatthorn said this is the only time the zoning issue will come before the City Commission, but other issues will arise as each phase of the project progresses. In response to a question, Ms. Glatthorn said this request is under the permitable thresholds. She will supply the City Commission with threshold information for Thursday's meeting. CM ADMINISTRATION Award Phase I of project for Organizational Review Services to Public Strategies Group, base fee $20,000 plus performance fee not to exceed $5, 000 and travel & incidental expenses not to exceed $6,000 (Consent) Three firms out of nine were considered from those that submitted RFQs (Request for Proposal) for a Phase I organizational review of City operations: Estimated costs indicated in their proposals are as follows: 1) Public Strategies Group total fees of $95,000; total travel costs of $ 23,000; 2) Arthur Anderson total fees of $1,080,000; total travel costs of $ 162,000; and 3) Management Partners, Inc. total fees of $321,730; total travel costs of $69,880. Phase I is a diagnostic phase to determine how the City can enhance customer service. The firm selected will gather information and data from the City, conduct interviews with stakeholders, and perform a preliminary SWAT (Strength and Weakness Assessment.) Once Phase I is complete, the firm will determine the remainder of the work to be performed for the project, how the work can be performed, time period, and a better estimate of the remaining project costs. Subsequently, the City will determine how to proceed with completing the project. Funding for the project will be appropriated from the City's Vision money. In response to questions regarding requested funds, Deputy City Manager Kathy Rice said $250,000 was budgeted for 1998. Phase 1 will cost an estimated $31,000 for a diagnostic look at the City's http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/HRL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 ` WitiWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Page 5 of 8 overall organization and assist the City in determining if operations and customer service are efficient. The timeframe involved is 60-90 days. She noted Arthur Andersen is an auditing firm with emphasis on strategy, and finite analysis, with an emphasis on hard numbers. The City Manager said he felt the issue is the processes used to do business. A question was asked what type of new information can be obtained by performing more studies. Ms. Rice said previous studies revealed information from customers about the City's customer service. She said the new studies will reveal information regarding the entire City organization. Final cost estimates can be determined after completion of the diagnostic phase. The City Manager said a full blown accounting audit will cost $1 million and more preliminary information is required. Structural, code-driven, and beauraucratic barriers exist that have developed over time which translate into customer service problems. An external perspective can reveal information that may not be realized internally. She will provide Commissioners with a copy of the proposal. In response to a question regarding the Bordner Study, Ms. Rice said that study revealed that people did not like some City services, but it did not supply a framework to address those issues. Those studies will not be reinvented. In response to a question regarding the firms listed for consideration, Ms. Rice said out of 7 RFQs (Request for Qualification), received, 3 firms were selected . In response to a question regarding what is left over in the City's Vision money after the $31,000 expenditure, Ms. Rice said she would supply the Commission with specific numbers. A list of stakeholders was also requested. In response to a question, the City Manager said the Commission's approval would only commit to Public Strategies' Phase I diagnostic study, and the other consulting firms will still be considered for future studies. Any further work would require Commission approval. In response to a question regarding a base and performance fee, Ms. Rice said those numbers are included in the contract. A list of satisfied clients from Public Strategies was requested. The City Manager said Public Strategies' bid was selected because they can provide the best level of service to meet the City's needs. CLK CITY CLERK Community Relations Board - 3 appointments It was requested this item be pulled in order to get more nominees. Parks and Recreation Board - 2 appointments It was requested the consideration of the reappointment of Mr. Kirbas be delayed until after the election. Appointment of Commissioner to represent the Commission as the Canvassing Board re 3/10/98 Municipal Election Section 101.5612 Florida Statues provides for the testing of tabulating equipment to ascertain if the equipment will correctly count the votes cast, and that the Canvassing Board convene at this time or appoint one of its members to represent it. The test is open to the candidates, press, and public. The test is conducted by processing a pre- audited group of ballots punched to record a pre-determine number of valid votes for each candidate. The test is repeated on election day before the start of the ballot count, and again immediately after completion of the ballot count. Tests will be conducted at the Election Service Center, 14255 49th Street North, Suite 202, Clearwater on: March 5, 1998, at 9:00 a.m.; March 10, 1998, at 10:00 a.m.; and March 10, 1998, after official tabulation of ballots. Vice-Mayor J. B. Johnson suggested Commissioner Hooper represent the Commission on the http://199.227.233.29/ISYSqueryARL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 WinWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Page 6 of 8 Canvassing Board. Commissioner Hooper said he may be out of town and is unsure when he will return. OTHER CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS Penny for Pinellas Extension - Interlocal Agreement Section 212.055 (2), Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), authorized the County to levy a discretionary sales surtax of one percent throughout Pinellas County, Florida, ("Discretionary Surtax"), subject to referendum approval, to finance, plan and construct infrastructure, as defined in Section 212.055, Florida Statutes. On November 7, 1989, levy of the Discretionary Surtax for an initial ten year period was approved by a majority of those voting on the question at a referendum. Pursuant to Section 212.054(4), Florida Statues (1988 Supp.), the Florida Department of Revenue is responsible for collecting the Discretionary Surtax and distributing the Net Proceeds thereof to the County on a monthly basis. The Net Proceeds of the Surtax may be distributed pursuant to an Interlocal Agreement entered into between the County and the cities. By Agreement dated September 19, 1989, the County and the cities entered into an Interlocal Agreement providing for the distribution of the Discretionary Surtax, which Agreement expires January 31, 2000. On March 25, 1997, the extension of the Discretionary Surtax for an additional ten years was approved by majority of those voting on the question at a referendum. It is in the best interest of the cities and the County to enter into an Interlocal agreement that will run concurrently with the extended levy of the Discretionary Surtax to provide a distribution among the cities and County. The Interlocal Agreement authorizes the cooperative exercise by agreement of two or more public agencies of any power common to them. As a condition precedent to executing the Agreement, each City must furnish the County with evidence that its governing body has, at a duly-noticed and publicly-held meeting, adopted a plan which specifies the infrastructure projects to be funded by that City's portion of the Discretionary Surtax. Each City signing this Agreement shall submit a list of the Original Infrastructure Project to the County at the time of execution evidence of the official action. Each City shall annually file its Capital Improvement Plan with the County and identify any material changes in the Original Infrastructure Projects. During the term of the Interlocal Agreement, the Discretionary Surtax shall be collected by the Florida Department of Revenue, and the Net Proceeds shall be distributed monthly to the Board of County Commissioners for distribution in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Net Proceeds shall be distributed between the County and the Cities within a reasonable time after receipt. City Attorney Pam Akin said it is essentially the same agreement used in the past. The City Manager said should the population change, the numbers do not change. Yearly transmittal of information is required. A public hearing will be needed if projects are changed. The first $80,000, 000 is allocated to the criminal justice system. The remainder is divided between cities. In response to a question, the City Manager said the population figures came from the 1995 census. A question was raised regarding total estimated costs. Ms. Rice said all costs are calculated in the numbers shown. A question was raised regarding whether the 3% administrative fee charged by the Florida Department of Revenue had been taken into account. Staff will verify. Other Commission Action Commissioner Seel indicated she no longer has the time to participate on the Florida League of Cities. http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 WirlWord Document: CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION Page 7 of 8 It was suggested Commissioner Hooper replace her. The City Clerk said the replacement requires approval by the President of the Florida League of Cities. The City Clerk will write a letter requesting Commissioner Hooper replace Commissioner Seel. Commissioner Seel congratulated the Police Department on their honorable mention from the Tampa Bay Regional Council. Commissioner Seel noted the Clearwater Housing Authority minutes indicate the board voted to change Condon Gardens' name to Jasmine Courts. Commissioner Seel said the Clearwater Main Library Site Selection Task Force lists the City Commissioners and Mayor as absent at the December 23, 1997, meeting. She noted she would have liked to have attended, but neither the Commissioners nor the Mayor were invited to that meeting. Commissioner Seel said the Sand Key Civic Association invited the City Commission to attend their beach renourishment program. She noted there is a conflict with the City Commission meeting. Staff will send the Sand Key Civic Association a letter explaining the conflict. Commissioner Clark said he received PSTA's audit statement. PSTA's net income for the year was $1.5 million. The operating loss was $23 million, less than in previous years. Commissioner Clark said there will be no public bus service to the Devil Rays' games. The City of St. Petersburg is not interested in offering a subsidy, nor is PSTA. He felt it would be a tremendous private sector opportunity. Commissioner Clark expressed his concern regarding citizens throughout the County immediately turning left at traffic lights as soon as they are green, without a green arrow. He felt the problem is of epidemic proportion and suggested remedies begin with City employees. Vice-Mayor J. B. Johnson said Clearwater received national publicly from a daily crossword puzzle. Vice-Mayor J. B. Johnson said he attended an excellent PIW workshop at Oakhurst School. Vice-Mayor J. B. Johnson said the Tampa Bay Estuary program would like to circulate a license plate petition. He distributed information to City Commissioners, noting signing the petition is not an agreement to purchase. Vice-Mayor J. B. Johnson referred to a magazine article regarding cell towers being placed in trees in the state of New Jersey. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 10:04 a.m. 6 mws02a98 02/02/98 Ask me about ISYS http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 y' WiAWord Document: CITY CONMSSION WORK SESSION Page 8 of 8 http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRL99A2.tmp/3/doc 06/22/2000 1 ~ i. Certified as a tine and'correct" ~ O ~ ~ ~ ' { 1998 the bevelopment Reviciv ommrt ~ arch t2 , ppmved in review asite plan/preliminary plat for SUA'SHIA'E h1ALL. 1Vilniss m h y and and the seal of the De"vclopment .Code-Administratot~ fUteCit o `•r.J Florida ^rva Y fClear}vafer, _ I on0us .dg. UA Y -F,, I .,,y F y~p~a ~ , U LEGAL DLSC121PTION: ' ' Rr; m ~ r. 1 . ' ~ w r l; fARCFL OF LAND LYING WITH{N TfiE SOUTHWEST I/4 OF ;E(,110N 15; TOWNtiHIf~~i ±,UF~ ~ ~ , PALACE I`. FAST, AND THE NORTHWEST I/4OF SECT CON 22, TOWNtiHiP,29 SOUTH, ,~'ANGY',;~AS~-' ~ . Coordinlto~`f... ~.-..:elm ~ atingDrp,i~nl4q F'INELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MURE•PARTICUCARLY`DESChIl3ED AS FOLLOWS. ~ ~ 4 Wr a ~ 4 Cerfificafipn~pfy "t toll'e f,OMMENCE Af THE SOUTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF' THE SOUTHWEST .I/4' OF SECTItiN~~i~ ~fl °Y- f„ a1;, A licant mustti'- ~(¢te~h°r,~flbnin° arlions~ ~ TOWNSHIP 29 SO!1TH, RANGE Ia EAST; PINECLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAME ALSOBEING~w1~lE~~~ " NORTHEAST BOUNDARY CORNER OF 'THE NORTHWEST I/4 OF" SECTION 22; TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH;. RANGEiS EAST, PINECLAS :COUNTY; FLORfDA, SAIp~~.SOUTHEAST~ BOUNDARYCORNER -BEING, S$9°03.''29°E:, (CSEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS.FOR THIS'DESCRIPTION} 2655.24 FEET FROM 1) 06ta1 _ n Ihe,requtsrPe~buildmg pennils for at one parcel wrthm one 1 least THE SpUTHWE~T FOUNDARY CORNER OF :'SA10 SOUTHWEST I/4 -0F >ECTION -15; THENCE cert~ca ' Oyear from Ure si(e plan Ion ate to prevent ev iralion of the site P plan certification; Id$9°03`29"U1, t~LONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION `15,-` SAME ALSO BEING THE' NORTHBOUNDARY LINE. OF SAID:NORTHEAST I/4 gFSECT10N 22;=~FOR~" 2) ' Obtain fhe ~epuisite certificate(s) of Deco i pancy for at leas! one parcel within flute (3) years of the site 55.00 FEET '(0 THE POINT OF INTERSEGT'ION `WITH .THE WEST:RIGHT-pF-WAY: LINE OF'MISSOURI .plan certification to prevent ex ira ' plan certification; P bon of the site ? AVENUE SAID SOi1C}{ BOUNDARY LINE pF SAID SOUTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION 15, AI;ONG SAID WEST 3} Obtain n'view and a PB V 1 G. 50 P rnuls for signs and 1 R~GHT~pSOUTi1 (S1r,TER0A0 5-595-A), SAME ALSOBEING THE POINT pF `BEGINNING; THENCE F-WAY LINE OF MISSOURI-AVENUESOUTH, THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5)-:COURSES; (I}THENCE N00°15`.59"E, ALONG 'A LINE.65.O0 FEET WEST pF AND`PARALLEL WITH"THE EAST BOUNDARY fencingisvalls Through separate review pemlittingprocedures;and and ~ LINE pF SAIb SOUTHWEST I/4 OF'SEGTION 15,-:FOR $G$,70 FEET; (2) THENCE'Np5°59'39°E, zoNED o~ 4) Each individual. arcel P (both shonm and/or to ' subsequently be created at an lime in ' FOR 15p 30 FEET; (3)THENCE'N00°(5'59°E, ALONG A LINE •50',00 'F'EET' WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITHSAID'fAST BOUNDARYCENE OF THESOUTHWE5T 1%4OFSECTION 15;FOR217.D$ Y the future) which does not show an buildin Y g or any other constmction on this site plan must be individual) ~ FEET; (4) THENCE N14°39'S2'~W; FOR.--31.05 FEET; (5"):THENCE. N39°32'26"W, FOR 38.04 'FEET TO THE POlN7 pF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT°OF-WAY LINE' OF "DRUID ROAp; reviewed and certified prior to any development, y THENCE N$9°01.'2$ W, ALONG 'SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY U NE'OF.DRUID RpAD, SAME, ALSO 5) ' Grant a !0 fl wide sidewal • ' . IJuhhty easement along ~ ~ the 117.49 ft section of restricted R/lV ~ I BEING A LINE X3,00 FEET SOUTH` 4F "AND PARALLEL :WITH THE NORTH $OUNDARY,LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST I/4 pF SAIb SOUTHWEST-I/4 OF SECTION 15, FOR 416<71 FEET;- THENCE LEAVING svldlh of i I_ , Greenwood Avenue fronta e. g i BcforetheCil can issue buildin ermits the ~ d :,AID '.SOUTH RIGHT-pF-WRY LINE OF DRUID ROAD, S00°02'p4"W,;FOR 363 23 FEET; THENCE n lirant must coin lete the folio»in ar • F~ ' boor. 552°U7~35'"W, FOR 669 92 FEET; THENCE SOO°02'04"W, FOR 17$.06 F'E'ET; THENCE N$9°03'52"W, FOf~ IO3:2b FEET"Tp REFERENCE .:POINT "A"; THENCE S21°g6'30°W, FOR P ~ -1:1~:41'~_.. 0 S00 09 t N(.:~_. ' ~ ay the Recreation Facilit t y Assessment Fee of ~ 8, ~ ~ 5200 per unit prior to buildin ; ~ Ohs, 143 36 FEET; THENCE 517°4$!00"W, FOR 93.58 FEET TO THE>FOlNT OF NTERSECTION WITH THE EAST R1GNT-QI-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE;.THENCE S00°09'19°W'ALONG SAIb EAST g petrnit (200 units};. ~ f . r* ~ ~ 5200= 540,000) for each a 4 p reel as tl Is developed ? ~ $ Op^ ' ua• RIGHT°OF-WAY LINE OF `GREENWOOD AVENUE ,SAME-'ALSO ,BEING A LINE 40.OO,FEET.EAST OF AND and certified, _ - 9 0 ~?T. ~...;a 6 , PARALLEL WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OE SAID.. SOUTHEAST (%4 OF THE SOUTHWEST I/4i OF SECTION 15, FOR"''ip9.$f FEET TO THE POINT OF; INTERSECTION WITH THE `SOUTH BOUNDARY DINE _ a _ _ , ' a-_ Before the C I can Issue a Ce ' 30 ~ rhficale of Occu anc • + E ~~r for the first buildin the a licant must col - ° ~ OF SAID 5OUTHWEST I/4'OF SECTION 15, SAME ALSO BEfNG'THE POINT OF 'INTERSECTION .WITH i7 9A „ s ~ , ~ ` followin actions: tt lete the ~ 41 ' . RESIDENCES B CONDOMINI MS- _.Por._-_3,_ w ~ 36 t THC NORTH BOUNDARY LINE 06 THE NORTHWEST 174-0F SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29`50UTH;`RANGE 15 EAST', PINE~LAS;COUNTY, FLORIDA; :THENCE N89°03':29"W,'CONT,INUING ALONG SAID EAST ~I i 7) Pay the Trans ortatiot ti - t mpact Fee (T1F) as - RIGHT-OF-WA't LILAC OF'GREENWOOD'AVENUE; SAME ALSO BEJNG SAID'NORTH :BOUNDARY' LINE` pF :THE NORTHWEST I/q OF SECTION 22 FOR 20,00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING ,SAID NORTH BOUNDARY ~I called for by the Pinellas Count Trans f ~ Q a0 _w_. m r, • Y portalion ~ V P B V P.G. U 4 l hnpact Fee Ordinance mth assistance in ~ ~ l LINE OF, THE NORTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION 22,!500°p2~p5°E, CONTINUING ALONG SAID,EAST determining the fee from the CI ' eanvaterTratTc r..:w Engineering Otlice if a I' Z ®N E D R M ®2 U RIGHT=OF-WA'i LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, SAME ALSO.:BEING A LINE 20.00'FEET EAST OF :AND :PARALLEL WITH 1NE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST I/4,OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF I 39 _,w...__._~.._. . as ( PP (cable) for each arcel rt Is developed-and certified.; P i 8) Visuallyscreenalld ~ SECTION 22, FOR IIi,.49 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY .LINE OF'GREENWOOD AVENUE,'S89"03'~~'E, FOR 435;17 FEET;'THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE AND .ZONED RM 28 umpsters with an enclosure (dimensions to6eaminimumof]0' ` , Lx12'1V)and 3g -ITS SOUTHERL'i EXTENSION; RESPECTFVELY, OF SUNSHINE TERRACE AS RECORDED IN'CONDOMINIUM provide gates (which can be secured open) with a t .minimum l2 ft.clearopening;and 1 i PLAT BOOK 7~}, PAGE 9:'OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINECLAS COUNTY, 'FLORIDA, THE FOLLOWING THREE (3} COURSES;' (I) ,"THENCE 500°10'32"E, FOR 195.60 FEET; (2) -'THENCE fn .,off Furnish as•builts and an engineer's certification to I r I Engineering Services foreach a 'S89°03'49'E, f`OR 209:00 FEET;: (3} THENCE SOO°IO''32"E, 'FOR 336.9$ FEET; THENCE p reel as they are , developed, ;rv.., I ___.w_~.~. ~ NOT PL TIED I !0) .Record all easements ° ~ >89°OZ;35°r, Fc)R 139 FEET; :THENCE S00°07'35°E, FOR 6.90 FEET; THENCE 5$9°45`'0,1"E, FOR 513.96' FEET; THENCE N00°19'29'W, 'FOR -i:30 .FEET;. THENCE on the final plat l _Z9NlNG -BOUNf7ARY 589°07'35"E, FOR 99,99 FEET TO THC POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF?MISSOURI`AVENUE SOUTH; ,,THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE • licant must coin lete 16e folloni - . n n as ZONED M 28 0 ~,.F OF MISSOURI AVENUE;SOUTII, THE FOLLOWING FOUR'(4} COURSES;'~I) :THENCE N00°1929°W, I i y I ~ ~ M.- 11) Future parcels will re wire a Q ~ + ' v1 + ALONG A'LINE'SO:OO FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE -0F AFORESAIb NORTHWEST I?4`; OF SECTION 22, FOR 332 29 FEET; (2) THENCE N37°Ii'41"W, FOR 25:00 q re•calculalion CPB / T PU.' J ' of Open f ~ ;Space requirements; once the cumulative ~ exceeds 50%of the o ' ' floor area . FELT; (3) THENCE NOO°.19'29"W,-ALONG A LINE'` 65,00 FEET WEST OF'AND PARALLEL,WfTH ' ?gmal square footage, this fee ~ ~ j ZONED RM-28 ~ ' will be due prior to the certification ~R r oflhesiteplan ' a ~ _ SAID .EAST BOUNDARY FINE OF THE': NORTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION 22, FOR 296.29 `FEET; {4} THENCE'INpO°(5.'59'E. ALONG A LINE '65.00 'FEET "WEST AND PARALLEL AFORESAID EAST where this increase take ..:a___- _ 0.. l f ~ place. Furthennorc, i _ ~-•.;;y ' additional development ofthis • BOEG~INNING~AND F THL SOUTHWEST I/4OF SECTION 15;` FOR (;IO FEET TOTHE POI NTrOF Property will re uire f~ ~ ` ~ ~ I r, . sahsfaction of a Recreation Land and Recre9' 4I I ! ahon I ~ ~ ~ I ~ Facility dedication assessment to be determined b ~ I ~ J ~.ONTAINING 1;53.7,229 SQUARE FEET'OR 35:'90 ACRES, MORE.OR LESS the Parts and Recreation De a } ` , F'~ I i ~ ~ , p rtmenk I 6 ~ ~ n TOGETHER WITH; • n I' 500' 0'32"E--, 195.60' M.~ ~ t COMMENCE AI AFORLSAID REFERENCE POINT'A'; THENCE N89°p3'52°W, FOR~IO.7p-,FEET TO ' _ e... hltl 1j!.,•~ THE POINT OF fiEGINNiNG, THENCE CONT(NIIE N$9°03'52~W;1 FOR 70:50 FEET TO THE POINT: OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID' EAST `RIGHT=OF-WAY. LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE ; THENCE G7 t ' S00°09`19"W, /aG)NG SAID EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY 'LINE pF GREENWOOD AVENUE SAME AL50= BEING ALINE g0:00_EEET EAST OF"AND: PARALLEL.WITH'AFORESAID'WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF 'THE 1 ~ • --SOUTHEAST :1/~! OF THE SOUTHWEST I/4 OF<SECTION 15, FOR- 190:57,, FEET, THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD .AVENUE, N17°49'00°E; FOR 62.49 FEET; 200 THENCE N21°46'30 E, FOR 139:90 FEET TO THE'POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 6,413 ` M ~ s\ ~ e` `„f , ' ~ ' I , E SQUARE"FEET CiR 0 Iq7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS { I 11-1 + i , ~ / I_ l i TOTAL AREA 1,~~43 F42 SQUARE FEET OR 35 437 ACRES, MORE OR LESS NOT PB 45 PG.:2Q ~ , a V,~ I . I l.._ _ , PLATTED , , ~ ZONED RM_ 28 ~ _ ~ I . p ~ M ~ i ~ ~ 1 E~ _ ~ a _...500"10'32 E 3,36;9$ ' I w _ _ ~ ryry t ~ .t ,..:.__r.. ~ ~ , 6.90 u ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ .w.,. f rv+~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t# - r 1, E __...w.~. 07 ~ 'MOn f I u S00'02 . (BUILDING DEMOLISHED , I it I , • _ ~~jf t-STY MAS BLDG ~ e ~Y'F MARY SAND ~ SUNSHINE MALL ( ) N ®T ° 430 573 S.F. - (BUILDING DI :(BUILDING DEMOLISHED) ~ ~ I ' D ~ / ' ' 1-STY MA 1-STY MAS BLDG 1y ~ /''1 ~ U C7 ®I, V (l~ I V N - ZONED Cc ".PLATTED ~ (MOVIE THEATER} / p i . _ ( ~ 19,450 ZONED PSP o w 19,450 S.F, P P 1 PO. 25 _ 1 7 r r,r ZONED Rid-2~ ,__r r , s ~.,a. , . _ .w I _ _ _._.v. _.u l r c~ t -7 3 ' ~ ~ r n l-.... p . F ti ~ \ + - + oil ` •.._.__.7.__- "•-.,,e ' _ H _ , 3 I _.,...~..,~....,m_ 8 - - ~ ..f I I - I e..__ e F ~..m ~ M i Aumr ~ , X ;i' 1 -_._M_:.~ } ° t i ill a. : a at ~ Nc I M - ,,lA _ z t STOR A ~ ' • m _ _ aye - a~q. -~.~r Mi'R.-... ~ ~ eir .u px _ `a.. Y M SOLAR s ~ - BUILDING; ~ 810 _ I i- ~ - _ 500'19'29"E ` ~ ; _ _M_ -M_.,._ ~ - _ . w~ . , ° ~ (VISIONWORKS) ~ 1,30': ~ ~ _ _ 4.: ~_w. r7 is r c~~ ~ , A ~~..a. ~ , .a ,..a ~ ~ MAR 01999 ~ a ~ - :,.a M.., ti n , , ~4 wv ~g _ ` ~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ' 1:10 1 r ~ _ ' ~ .296 29 ~ _ r • ~ ~ ` i I S3937 ~6~E ~ SERVICES ` 0 30' w ~gdAU2ED INTERS'EC110N ~N37'11~41 W t 15 , --m`---~-#~ - - ~38"04 • CITY OF CLEARWATER 30' 25.00 ~ ® a - 14'39 2 4>~I~dAUZED IN'IER~CIIQN k 3t,a ' LEGEND Mf COR OF' NW 1/4 c_t OF 22-2O5-1sfE SW.1/4 pF 18=205-1 ~ ~ _.pa.,, . ~ ~ ~ ~ t/4 ~ EXISTING WATERMAIN 'WITH GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY ~ . ~ ~ _ _ _ - EXISTING WATERMAIN WITH FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY , m ~9 ~ . M ti? VE I ~ H --"Q- - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN , y ` (n'~ ~ LCD (~..;6 a J U B D I VI ~ I V N ' ~ ~ ,~~..~",ny~ EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WITH PIPE ~ .,I• m ,~r s PB 1 PG. _41 2ND ADDIT ION..... 1ST ADDITION r a PB 30, PG. ~3 P ZONED CC B 48 PG. 58 PB 3~ PG. 53 Y c / , ZONED CC Q , , ~ ZONED CC g .ZONED CC ,UE3JE~.1 PROPEkTY IIE> WITHINFLOQD ZONL X, 6A FLOOD ELEVATION ='N~i~, ~ I i IF FLOC IJ IN;IININCE RAIF MAP, COMMUNITti' F~A>`~If I 125096 0015, MAP ' ~y,Fe~ F<L'll~;(p A1J~,1~51 IU i9g1 ~ ~ - , r ' ~ ' a r, ' ~ a `/,t 1, r~l ~ r ,A, ~ DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE OUAUTY " 1 PREPARED FOR: ` ti SNEE.l OLSCRIPTION• 4, : , IPTION. ' J08 N0. 4 ,°.2~'''.~~! CONTn01 OFFICFR`IIJ THIS SOafF _ HARRIS INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED DRAWN OARC~U1~p+L III 7AN `E ~ CLEARWATER A FLQRf A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP > PERMITS -HAV i ! E BEEN OBTAINED ry 1 INC. SUNSHINE ALL SUBDIVISION 1 s0-01 ANDTHAT CONSTAUCYION`IS 202fi POWERS FERRY ROAD M. EDWARDS ENGINEERS ENVIRONME NTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS PRELIMINARY PLAT F.B. S P6. CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE; + o SUITE 250 1639 f9 I >rmick.Dr.-Clearwofer FL, 33759 3 12/01/98 ADDED SITE PLAN'/ NOTED BUILDINGS DEMOLISHED SHT. R. HARRIS o l Tel; (AL'.) 724-8422 Fax (&13)724-8606 ATLANTA, 30339 SUPPLEME PL MENTAL DRAWING I LA 2 11/16/98 ADDED BUILDING' SQUARE FOOTAGE 12~17~97 PHONE: 770) 955--H36 c EXISTING 02/05L98 ADDED SUBDIVISION NAME :AT E' \N NO. DATE REVISIONS ADY D n=1 o0, OF u P~~GE~..1- 5A SITE DATA, TABLES LEGAL DESCRIPTION; LOGATIUN MAP 3LE5 PARCEL 6 SITE DATA TABLE A PARCEL 'OF LAND LYiNG WITHIN THE :SOUTHWEST :1 /4 OF SECTION I5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, ZONING DISTRICT: Mp PARCEL 6 (200 APARTMENT UNITS} PROPOSED MIN. ~ MAX. REQUIRED D (Master Punned' Da4elopment) RANGE'I5 EAST„ AND THE NORTHWEST.I/4'OF SECTION 22;'TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE `I5 EAST, d Development) ZONING DISTRICT: MPD (Master Plonned Devdapmenk) P I MECCAS COUNTY, 'FLORIDA; BE I NG: MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:' zmstr~ v!~xr ` . eaFO - PARCEL 1 - EXISTING 5,650 SF STADIUM RESTAURANT• PAVEMENT PARKING 4REA5 " BE RE-STRIPED'IN ORDER TOrACCOMMODA `N ~ / p TE EW LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON PLAN NEN / PARKING AREAS TO 'FER ON l~LAN'NEW USE; RESIDENTIAL COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST BOUNDARY :CORNER OF THE :SOUTHWEST, I/4 OF SECTION 'I5, rased PARCEL 2 -EXISTING VISIONWORKS CENTER: PAVEMENT ARKiNG AREAS TO BE RE-; AREAS TO BE RE-STP,IPED TO ACGOMMODAIF NEW LANDSCAPE,BUFFER ON PLAN VIEW :TOWNSHIP. 29 SOUTH, `RANGE 15' EAST, ,;PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAME ALSO'BEING THE w P ..NORTHEAST:BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST `I/4 OF `SECTION 22 TOWNSHIP 29; SOUTH, PARCEL 3 -COMMERCIAL s, c~° PARCEL 4-4A -.COMMERCIAL PARCEL AREA (SO. F?. AND ACRES) 8,334 ACRES - 363,029 SF 10,000 FT (MIN.) RANGE 15;EAST, PINELLAS -'COUNTY; ;FLORIDA, SAID .:SOUTHEAST BOUNDARY- CORNER BEING KTa' HF S89°03'.29"E , _ (BEING THE `BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION } 2655 , 24 FEET FROM ~ era s;~,cr PARCEL 5=5A - COMbIERgAL GROSS AREA (WIJHIN PROPERIY LINES) THE 'SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWE5T4 I/4 :OF ' SECTION I5; THENCE ~ ' "~`"°'Q MIXED USE'FORMULA ' PARCEL WIDTH: 810 FT. 100 FT (MIN,) PARCEL DEPTH: 610 FT. 100 FT (MIN.) N89°03'.29"W; ALONG THE. SOUTH.BOUNDARY'LINE OF'SAID SOUTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION 15, G E,~, ;ab~ SAME `ALSO BEING 7HE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE -0F .SAID NORTHEAST ` i /4 OF SECTION 22 , fOR ~ Parcd Area. (SF) .(~-Unite x Grose SF/Unit) =Lot Areo (SF) for Comm. r Comm, DENSITY 24 UNITS /ACRE 24 UNITS J,ACRE 65:00 FEET TO THE POINT OF: INTERSECTION `'WITH THE WEST RIGHT-Of-WAY L I NE OF M 15SOUR f W Sq: Ft, Camm: ®Lot Area SF for Commerclol x FAR DNINp HOAG AVENUE;SOUTH,(STATE ROAD S?595-A), SAME `ALSO BEING THE' POINT ''OF-BEGINNING;'' THENCE k (35.437)(43560) - (644 x 11315)'= Lot'Area'{Sf) for Comm. BUILDING COVERAGE ; LEAVING SAID:SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID _SOUTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION 15, 'ALONG SA i D WEST 1,543,636 -1,166,fi6O = 374,776;' (S0, FT. ANDS OF GROSS SITE):. 94,636 SF - 26,19: RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE Of MISSOURI AVENUE SOUTH, THE'FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES;,(I)THENCE tIDN ; Cornm.SF~ 374,776 .55 =..206127 ° " ( ) , _N40 15 59 E,; ALONG A LINE'65:00 FEET WEST OF AND'PARALLEL WITH THE EAST'BOUNDARY k~H, GROSS FLOOR AREA-. AND F.A.R. 229,757 SF - 0.632 LINE OF' SAID SOUTHWEST I/a_OF SECTION `J5, FOR 868,70 FEET; (2) THENGE'N05°59 39 E, The mixed use formula will allow a maxim m r ' area ratio (FAR) in the comrnerciGl sErBACKs FOR 150:30 FEET; (3)THENCE N00°15'59"E, ALONG A LINE 50:00 FEET WEST OF AND- ~ u fled area retie (F~ tracts of 4.66, The FAR in the commercial tracts will be invited PARALLEL' WITH SAID EAST BOUNDARY LINE"OF THE SOUTHWEST I/4 OF SECTION 15, FOR 217,08.'. ,Q DRAWING) will be invited to 0,55. ' FEET; (4)`THENCE N14°39'52"W, FOR 31 05 FEET;'(5) THENCE N39°32'.'26"W, FOR 38.04 The develo merit of the ornm i I p c erca parcels',noted as Parcels 1 through 56,'-shall be FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY L1 NE OF' DRUID ROAD;•: ' FRONT 50 FT. rough 56, "shall be governed bq the ° fallowing des(gn parameters: 'THENCE N89 01 ' 28"W, ;ALONG SA 1 D 'SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY L 1 NE OF "DRUID `ROAD,. SAME ALSO Yhsr ya oe ¢asr a, oa annstve,r SIDE - 60 FT. RT. HO FT. LT. 30 FT (MIN). „ BEING A LINE 33:00 FEET. SOUTH OF AND. PARALLEL WITH THE.NORTH`BOUNDARY LINE -0F THE sotback frorn street right-of-way. 25-Feet 'SOUTHEAST I/4 OF SAID: SOUTHWEST i/4-0F SECTION 15, FOR 416.71' FEET;`- THENCE LEAVING Q Q gf side seibocks 1G Faot REAR $Q FT. 15 FT (MIN) SAID : SOUTH R 1 GHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRUID ROAD; S00°02 04 W,-FOR 363.23: FEET;. 7HENGE t~ mor setback 10 Feet BETWEEN'STRUCTURES 2a FT, (MIN.) 15 FT (MIN).... HEIGHT 40 FL 50 FT S52°07'35"W,-`FOR 669,92- FEET; `THENCE- SOO°02'04uW, FOR '178.06 FEET; THENCE' w N89°03`52"W, FOR IB3;26 FEET<TO REFERENCE_POINT "A";` THENCE S21°46'30°W, FOR ` ~ Q - maximum heighf 50 Feet 143.36 'FEET ; THENCE' S 17°48' 00"W, FOR 93.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH , ~ ~ minimum open spots .15 THE EAST RIGHT OF-WAY` LINE OF GREENWOOD' AVENUE; THENCE 500°09' 19"W, 'ALONG SAID EAST. ; . maximum loor area ratio .55 PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS {S4. FT, AND ~ OF SITE) 128,249 SF - 35,3X RIGHT-OF-WAY LiNE OF GREENWOOD>AVENUE ' S ALSO'BEING'A LINE`40.00 FEET EAST OF AND ' m • ~ ? maximum building coverage .55 'PARALLEL WiTH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4-0F THE SOUTHWEST I/4 Of ' SECTION 15, fOR 109.81 FEET:TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION'WITH.THE.50UTH BOUNDARY LINE `'""~`~'"AM"~ m `n a~ a Corpmer is 'entitle, ants and:devel merit stan rds f OPEN SPACE OF SAID SOUTHWEST I/4;OF SECTION 15; SAME ALSO BEING'THErP01NT OF INTERSECTION WITH a u p THE 'NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST"I/4 OF'SEGTION 22,'TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE ~ ~ perlod'0 years. rom the :,date o ..approval o ' he M standgrds. fQr parcels 1-5A shall remain in effect fora (TOTAL Foe THE LGT rQl 0 the Mh'D zoning, SQ. FT, AND 5 OF SITE) ,..140,144 SF - 38,85 15X (MIN,) 15 EAST; PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE° N89°03'.29"W, CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST Parkin re it merits sh II be as set forth.. in the Cit In the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, The uses PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING :RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, SAME ALSO'BEiNG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF ~ Q y THE; NORTHWEST' I/4 Of SECTION 22, .FOR 20:00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH BOUNDARY ''I ~ permit ed S a :be aS` f0I0W5` (SQ. FT, AND 5 OF PAVED VEHICULAR t0.453SF - 7,45 65 (MIN.) - LINE OF-THE NORTHWEST-I/4 OF SECTION'"'22,'S00°02'05"E, CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST:. ~ ' Indoor Retail-Sales restaurants, b siness rofes tonal AREAS) ~rofes Tonal offices `medical clinics/laboratories, b~lsiness services, PARiciNc RIGHT-OF-WAY:LINE. OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, SAME ALSO BEiNG ALINE 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND ~ ~ ~P . >PARALLEL WITH THE WEST`BOUNDARY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST I/4 OF SAID NORTHWEST :I/4'OF persanai s rVICE;S; Ind00 - C mmerClQl> reoreQtlOn .ante ~tion~ente Inm n~, non-profit egoist or community. eryices, RESIDENTIAL ' SECTION"-22, FOR' 117;49 FEET; THENCE LEAVING'SAID EAST RIGHT-OFrWAY LINE OF GREENWOOD CammerCla ®r trade sC oo s, asollne stations, hate r AVENUE,"....589°03'29"E FOR 43S.J7FEET; THENCE_ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE AND day-Care, nlgiltClUbS,'_ta4 rn , , rid bQr , package alt n~ Ions, atemote , accessory dwellm s, art :galleries s$udlos adult ~ckagehalc~"flalic bev ra a<s6i s, ve{{*~rinar o'tfi es chit da "-care 1.5 sPACES/i BEDROOM uNlr ITS`SOUTHERLY' EXTENSION, RESPECTIVELY'; OF SUNSHINE'TERRACE AS RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM- photo (OphiC; rOCeSSIng aka I IeS, rin In and-.pUbIIS I! conv@~i ante s ores alcoholle even and publis~iln fgcili~ies aso~ine stations ,vehlc~e' servo p, Y ' aEQUIRED x 144 uNiTS PLAT BDDK 74 PAGE 9 -0F THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY; FLORIDA, THE FOLLOWING age s ies, research" THREE ` (3) COURSES: O) THENCE" 500° bO'32°E,' FOR 195.60 FEET; (2) THENCE OC bgked goods, s, research f~lcillties, laboratories, productlan o confectionery AND 2,a sPACts/2 eEOROOM uNir 'REQUIRED X 56 331 328 S89°03'49'E; FOR'209',00' FEET.;:.. (3) THENCE ` S00° 10'32"E; FOR 336.98 fEETs THENCE ` TOSS aCCeSS,'Shared Uti~ItleS and CrOSS arkin Wlll ,be irking will be dedicated as necessary to `serve the commercial signaga `S89°07'35"E, ,.FOR Is39 FEET; .THENCE" S00°07'.35"E, FOR, '6,90 FEET; THENCE eVe10 merits,' , p ~ p S89°45`01"E,", FOR 513.96 FEET;: THENCE N00°19'29"W, FOR» 1,30 FEET; THENCE 1: The Missouri Ave. entrance sign shall be o maximum 64 square feet In size and eholl be a and away from adjoining residential properties and street maxlmam 2a' nign, and will be located to the Northeast area of parcel 2. 589°07'.35"E <FOR 99;99 FEET TO THE POINT. 'OF' INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID WEST' ' All Slte ~Ighting Shall be directed downward and away i rights-of-way. RIGHT-DF-WAY LINE OF MIS50URi AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST. RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSOURL AVENUE SOUTH, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) 000RSE&; (i THENCE ' N00° 19''29"W, w..._ s:__ T @ SI n,ag for the CO mefclal de e10 merit far QCh 2. All site Nghting ahcil be directed downward and away from adjoining roaidaritlal properties and stroot nt for ach of parcels 1-5A sh411 ~e consistent with the signaga rights-or-way, ALONG A"LINE 50,00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL`WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF AFORESAID: . a. N89' 'Z9"W ~ a lOW@ °In he' General'- Oml'1'1.erClal IS rlCt aS of he c NORTHWEST ; I /4 OF SECTION 22 , FOR 332.29 FEET ; ° (2) THENCE N37° I I ' 41 "W, FOR ..25:00 - S00 02 05 E 117.49. ,.20.0 5 WALK as of ~he date of the submitta a this plan.:; FEET;'(3) THENCE N00°-19'29."W, ALONG A LINE :65.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL: WITH SAID EAST'BOUNDARY LINE OF-THE NORTHWEST I/4 OF'SECTION 22; FOR 296.29 FEET; (4) ,PARCEL 7 SITE DATA TABLE ° ~ " o ~ 190,57. THENCE N00 I5 59 E, ALONG A LINE 65.00 -FEET WEST AND PARALLEL AFORESAID EAST 5 U ST KE'Y, PARCEL 7 (240 APARTMENT UNITS) PROPOSED MIN, OR MAX. REQUIRED.' BOUNDARY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF_ SECTION.. 15; FOR 1:10 FEET TO THE POINT OF SIGN aa<nn 1:;,~~, cv BEGINNfNG AND CONTAINING 1,537,229 SQUARE FEET OR 35:290 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. g3 ap^•W N2 o ZONING DISTRIGT: MPD (Maatar Plonned Development) USE: RESIDENTIAL , TOGETHER WITH^ 48`5-; "~~0~ LANDSCAPE BUFFER , S ~ ~ PARCEL.AREA (SQ. FT. AND ACRES) 10.00 ACRES -.435,600 SF 10,000 FT (MIN,) COMMENCE AT AFORESAfD REFERENCE P01NT "A"; THENCE N89°03'52"W, FOR 10.70 FEET TO 3 ~ z THE POINT, OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N89°03'52"W, FOR 70.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF ~ GROSS AREA (WITFIIN PROPERTY LINES) , INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY. LINE 'OF GREENWOOD AVENUE; THENCE I" ,:~r PARCEL WIDTH: 820 FT, 100 FT (MIN,) SOO°09'.19"W; ALONG ,SAID EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY .LINE -0F GREENWOOD AVENUE", SAME ALSO- ~ to ' 20 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ' _p. BEING A+LINE 40.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL"WITH:AFORESAiD WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL DEPTH: 970 FT. 100 FT (MIN.) SOUTHEAST'I 4 OF THE SOUTHWEST.1 4 OF SECTION 15 'fOR 190.57 fEET• .THENCE LEAVING ~ r N DENSITY 24,0 UNITS /ACRE: 24 UNITS / "ACRE SAID° EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GREENWOOD`'AVENUE, N17°48'00"E, FOR 62,49 FEET; <; ~ " ~ a 5o roe zoo :THENCE N21 46 30 E, FOR 139.90.FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING'AND CONTAINING 6,413 BUILDING COVERAGE ~B' _ , SQUARE FEET OR 0.147 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. _ _ ~ ' ,r_ N (SQ, FT. ANDS OF GROSS SITE): 139,337 SF - 3i.95 .TOTAL AREA 1,543,642 SQUARE.FEET`OR 35.437 ACRES,-,MORE OR LESS GROSS FLOOR AREA AND F,A.R. 375,000 SF - 0,48 0,55 NO ...,.BANK' ~ . ' ARY RAND WATER BERVICE, TO BE , ~ViCE, TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CffY OF C ATER SETBACKS w s_.. o, . Z LANDSCAPE NOTES ~ e ~ a~L T~R~~ sT®R~' eupo.~~s Ru~R ~R~ sN~. ARE SPRINKLERS ° SIAMESE C4NIVECTI4N h([TFIlN 44' FRONT 75 FL 31,25' (MIN.) (V 4,: S~ ~ y~, 1 > 8. 1 SIDE 120 FLIRT. 185 FT, Lt 16.25' (MIN.).. o 500'02 04' W 78,06 ;The bufferolongthe Missouri Avenue rfght'af way will consist of the following landscape..,. rn REAR 120 FT. ` 16.25' (MIN.). L 75x of the length of the property wnl have groupings of shrubs that are 24" tali at installation.. ~ ' LEGEND BETWEEN STRUCTURES N/A ' v 2, :.Ono shade tree ortwo medium trees will be planted every. 30 lineal feet These trees will be 12-foot tall and i ~ ; « 3-Inch collper minimum. g~,r;; a„~" „ „ lo" II' s a . ® r~ a 3. Palm trees may bo used for up to 25x of the tree requirements. wb,, ® e , , ; ; ! I ; , : , ~ ~ . PROPOSED WATER LINE WITH. IiIIcHr 45 FT. 5o Fr FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PAvED vEHICl1LAR AREAS r.~: (SO' FT. AND S AF ~lE) 114,675 SF - 28.35 The buffer along khe'right of way of Or•uid Roodand Greenwood Avenue will consist of the following .landscape::. 12,14' t " E%iST. 4Y I~i,fO,I el~l7 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER oPEN sPACE 1MTH MANHOLE '(rorAl. FoR TTIe LotsQ. FT. L 75x of the length of the property will.. have groupings of shrubs that are. 24 :.toll at instolutfon. a ~ 10 LANDSCAR FFER ~.w$,<.C~ . EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - At+D z of sITE) 172,ass sF - as.5z >5z (MIN.} 2, Orie shade tree or two medium trees will be planted every 40 lineal feet. These trees will be 12-foot #all and " S00'10'32"E 1 e s,a,s,s,~° e 95.60 r... , e PAR~EL 7 ;1, 3-inoh:caliperminimum. o r e s~,, WiTH MANHOLE ~ PARKING LOT'INTERIOR:' 3. Palm trees ma be used for u to 25% of the tree re uirements, o l ,1, ' ~ ~'1 . u' ' ~ p>. Y P q rn ~ an~ ~,a+ 1G PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LANOSCEwINC (sQ. FL AND z . _ , _ , o ® e _ _ s E ~ ~ G 4 ~ r if , ~ N: ~ , 1 ~a41 f, i WITH GRATE INLET OF PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS) 9,120 S.F. - 7.9z 6X {MIN.) - ~i.. The buffer olongthe property line adpcent to multi. family residential shall consist"of the following landscape: a ~ . ,i, ~,n~ " ~ , u: . PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PaRKINC RESIDENTIAL ' L The entire length will have a continuous rou in of shrubs that are 24" at installation. rr 12 ' ' ` ' 1 r ~ I ~ ~ . Fr - - 1~ ~ ( a , i , WiTH FLARED END SECTION Gas sPACE/UNIT x 24a uNlrs 1ao 16a _ ~ 2. One ahade treo ortwa medium trees will be planted every 40 lineal foot: These traea will be 12-fook #all and ~ ? ~ ' ' ` ~ - . , PROPOSED STORM DRAIN (PARKING RAT10 FOR APTS. FOR ELDERLY) P 3-inch"tali er minimum, tla, ,..x a-_ '~ti w . ; WITH STORM 'MANHOLE In odditlonai to 240 apartment unite the building in Parcel 7_will contain approximately ..18,000 SF of apace ' ~ ' ' 3: Palm trees may be used for up`to 25x. of the tree .requirements: _ , _ ~ EXISTING STORM DRAIN for ancillary uses such as the main tabby,"leasing office, clubhouse, mailroom, bcrbar/beauty shop, exercise roan, mukipurpose card bingo room, library, laundry room, arts Ec crofts ocUdtiea roam, etc. WITH .STORM MANHOLE , ~ _ o • , , ..q ~ , ~gnoge S89'0T35"E m ' b,. ¢"4 _ _ . ro , b e ® r u " , ~ _ 1; The Missouri Ave. entrance sign shall be a maximum 84 square feet in atae and mall be o 1.39' ~ Q LANDSCAPE BUFFER maximum 20' high.: 2. Tho (Yeenwood Ave.` sign shall be o maximum 32 square feet In size and shall be o maximum of 10' high. 500'10'32"E 336.98 16, .r'o e . a . _ 3:-All site lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining rosidentlal properties cnd street I . ~ , , „ ~ 9,'~~ II 1b ~ ~ ~ ~.t _ _ 000 ( x,. ~6 . _ 73 E 1ll~s -.III sr l;i ~sr,o-~. - m:. I i LATER I OR LANDSCAPE rights-ot-way. • 6.90 ~ ~ x " t ; „ I , , , o.. _ ® PARCEL B:SITE DATA TABLE ;,Ita 31 ~ , ~ , 1 a, . ~ . D DUMPSTER PARCEL 8 (204 APARTMENt UNITS). PROP05ED MIN. OR MAX. ` REQUIRED ' 15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER , ZONING DISTRICT: MPD (Master Plonned Development) ~ USE: RESIDENTIAL ~ _ ~ . - \ PARCEL AREA (SO, FT, AND ACRES) 9.95 ACRES - 433,422 SF , 14,000 FT (MIN,) ~ n. ~ GROSS AREA (NdTHIN PROPERTY LINES) ,r.a i~9' c - , ~ ~ I. ~ ' ' _ 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER PARCEL 6ND1H: 1,087 FT, 100 FT (MIN.) . „ , r ~ . N,: i PARGEL 6~ ; I [ I . I c `r~ 5U0~, Dom' 04 W n 36 PARCEL DEPTH: 797 FL 104 fT (MIN.) PARGEL6 ~ , I ; ~ . , x. ~...a . ; . _ DENSITY 20,5 UNITS /ACRE 24 UNITS /ACRE ~ ~ BUILDING COVERAGE CROSS NATCHINO DENOTES ~ PARGEL. ~ ti`~, THE PARi OF THE BUILDING THAT wiLL i, ,w ~ ~ ~ w~~ 1~'~~ ;;I, D¢ BE THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT, REMAINDER , . _ ~ £ ~ , ; , , , , ro.. ~ ®B" (SQ. FT, ANDS OF GROSS STTE): 78,937 SF - 18.25 ®e: I GROSS FLOOR AREA AND F.A.R. 228,111 SF -:0.53 0,55 OF BUILDING WIIL BE 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT b i :,r N_ QETENTION AREA - 5E113ACKS f ; ~ lr ®7 7.. ~ i ~ , " QI.`f O e7 7. x.50 AC. i, FRONT 80 FT. 3L25' (MIN.) OF EXIS G URIV WAy ~O 9 ; SIDE 60 FT. RT. 25 FT, LT. 16.25' (MIN.) .e..., e~..? _ - REAR , 50 FT. 18,25' (MIN,) " " - - , ~ 14E''`I d; ~,MI a <P " ~ ~i _ k~ ' tali i°if n., I v, ~ i~{ I N ll~ill!r _ n; II _ ~ id" ~e ~ /e ~ a ~ BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20' MIN, „ . , W ~ D C,. f- ,.,4 , v>. 4..w .u ,,,F,,,z~-~.. 3N HEIGHT 45 FT.(3 STORY-ALL UNITS) 50 FT } 3 ~ i; ~ ~ I i t Y 10~ I 1,0, I I ;T I 7, ~ I~ n 10LANDSCAPE ' 'o ,,._,.-,m.~„ 2. ~ , ,,,,,,f ~ _ ~ ~~I PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS m ~ 1p~"h°~ } . 4" t0 ~ I ~ I 1 t1 G 8'~ -I r i BUFFER ~ ~ ~ ;GEL (SO. FT. AND 5 OF SITE) 135,551 SF - 31.25 R GEND 11° _ li"s° ~ 10' LA~DSCAPE 2i' M Citrus Tree OPEN SPACE " ' I ffi Chcrr' Laurel Tree 10 LANDSCAPE ~ I BUFFER y e t , a _ ~ ~ (TOTAL FOR THE LOT Sa.. Fr. 'i • ° ~ = Holly: Tree i " 10' LANDS APE BUFFER I AND z OF siTE) x49,931 5F -48,45 155 (MIN.) L._: _ PARKING LOTiNTERIOR _ _ _ , m Oak Treo ' ..s a ~ 17" rn f } __L, ~ Q ~ ~ LANDSCAPING (SQr FT, AND 5 Palm Treo I PA PARGEL 5 ~ RG Hf1CEL 5N ' 1 STORY MASONRY ) OF' PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS 9,003.00 S.F. - 8.85 , 65 (MIN.) =Punk; Tree ~ w_. 5 PARCEL ~"12~' PARGEL 4A , ~ . , „ ~ PARGEL. 7 SD019 29 E , ~ ~ a ~ I ';I, i ~11'~ Ii DCi ~ e BUILDING # 810 ,I PARKING w . ` Qa aio° air' ® , r i ~ , 1...30 __~__.m__ Deb , I ~ in m ~ 'HT: FENCE.. , (VISIONWORKS) 1.5 SPACES/1 BEDROOM UNIT - M , r _-.a sIGN FoR r lr ~ REQUIRED x 98 UNITS o PARCEL 6 ' t0 1 ~ ~T~p i P 1A ~ ° , , : ! , 11 j PARCEL 1 ~ , i ~ I r J ; AND 2.4 SPACES/2 -3 BEDROOM UNIT5 ~`e- I .W M ~ % REQUIRED X 108. 380 360 . - I ~.~".~,r_ - i I (INCLUDES 16 GARAGE SPACES) ....,.,,.,,,,,,^^~..a m,~. _ 1 i N00'19 9 W _ 868.70 ~ - 15 ,LANDSCAP 15 6 WALK ~ , ~ - - E UFF B ER SIGN FOR 15 15 LANDSCAPE BUFFER` 6 WALK N00 T9 29 W 332,29 6' WALK 296 29 " 6 WALK SIGN FOR , PARCEt:' 8 N0. „dry.. 539'3226"E signaga 6 WALK NUS, o39„e N0015`59"E 217.08' N14 39 52'W v 15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER N3711 41 W PARCEL 7 1: 25` 38.04 1. The ~dlssourl P ontronca sign shall be a maximum 84 square foot (n size and shall bo a 150.3 ' 10 E3' , rnaxmum 20 ~~gh, ~ w~.; :w~-.-__ _ 25.00, _ - - 31.05` 2. All site lighting shall' bo directed downward and away from adjoining roaidontlol properties and street _ _ • JEFFORDS ~ rlghts~-af-way. _ _ ~ f, _ r _ ~ ~ ; LOTUS ; r:........ a-, MAG~t~LfA ~__....:.d , a - - ENTRANCE TQ ~ q o t' \ , ~ } ,JASMINE.- - $ 1 /29/99 ADDED. OUTPARCEL DRIVES r at ; o l' SHOPPING CENTER ' , r~ ~ ; c, _ , ~ t ~ 7' 12/01/98 .ADDED SITE PLAN /COTS 1-8` ~ ~ ~ ~ 4• ~ kl h o 0 6 11/tti/9~ REVISED LAYOUT = PARCELSi5-7, REV. PER .CITY COMMENTS <~~'r`~~' a THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY ` ~ DE6IGNED PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, F1 SCRIPTIbN. F111®ClNt'1111lP"'-e e~' s ^rtewr~nn~a~iw?® ® a.~. y w ohrc/oA RGtncan ievniiT ~ Aearcic A`a, a ocnui?iarecn rnu .onorcic 'i1'.~ ex - CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE jg~ U'MM~Q-"1~J~IM MALL 0U QVug ®lV q yi'UlNl I% -ts, v v +v vv r+vl.v I.n lvvl nl\VLLV V W V I\LIYVIYIVLI\LV 441Yi+ I f~l\VLLJ. v~ nv. ~ R. HUmIS INDICATES T14AT ALL REQUIRED THE L A WATER GROUP DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED LTD. A FLI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C- FLORIDA DESIGN (3ONSULTANTS, INC. 4:. 8/27/98..RENASED DETENTION POND AREA'. 180-01 AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS N EDNAROS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS 2026 POWERS FERRY ROAD 3' T 13 98 ADDED PARCELS 5, 5A, 5B, 7, AND 8' F.D. a PG. Lg B A Y LI PRE ~ CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. ~p ~ 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 SV 250 ca w: eaala Tel: (813) 724-8422 - Enx,; (813)724-8606 SUPPLEMENTAL, DRAWING AND ~ SITE L 2 1 27 98 ADDED NOTE...- PARCELS 1-SG :SITE DATA TABLE sHT, 1 1 27 98 ADDED LANDSCAPE BUFFER--,REAR OF COMMERCIAL OUTPARCELS' 1 5 98 7n SUPPLI A NTA30339 PROPOSED CO ' PHONE: (770) 955-1136 a NDITIONS DATEI NO. DATE REVISIONS APP BYD 4"=100 OF 1 i