Loading...
12/12/199012/12/1990 601 BELCHER RD N ALLERGY AND ASTHMA CENTRE .- 41 •" fflaBTR BRW, INC. 200 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 206, JANNUS LANDING ST PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PHONE: 813/895-1692 TRANSMITTAL ,4- MZ6e her _12,__1990? To: Sandy Glatthorn City of Clearwater Planning 10 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, F1. 34618 From: Robert A. Rutledge of- Re: Transportation Analysis 'The A-1-1 ergy 'and--Asthma Centre z 90 -° T W ITI n two me. Item(s): No. Description 2 Original Transportation Reports - Signed/Sealed Purpose: as you requested for your information x for your approval Remarks: review and return reply to sender other (see remarks) ST. PETERSBURG PHOENIX TUCSON DENVER MINNEAPOLIS TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS MR THE ALLERGY AND ASTHN IX CENTRF. Clearwater, Florid., Prepared for: The City of Clearwater Pinellas County Florida Department of Transportation At the request of: The Kinsale Partnership Prepared by BRW, Inc. Transportation Engineers/Planners St. Petersburg, Florida December 3, 1990 a ';?,. .?'' ? .rte `; •` .r r_ INTRODUCTION .....................................1 Study Procedures ....................... . .... ....... 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................. 3 Development Site Location ............................. 3 Development Site Access .............................. 3 Traffic Assessment .................................. 4 Capacity Thresholds ................................. 4 FUTURE CONDITIONS .................................. 5 Project Trip Generation ..... .... . ......... ............ 5 Project Traffic Distribution .......... . . . . .... ........... 5 Project Traffic Volumes ............................... 8 On-Site Parking ................................... 8 Roadway Improvements ............................... 8 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................ 8 Recommendations ..................................9 APPENDIX .........................................10 Driveway Capacity Analyses ............ ..... . ... ....... 11 TABLE 1- Trip Generation Characteristics ....................... 6 TABLE 2 - Traffic Conditions ............................... 6 i M 2 ap ............................ on FIGURE 1- Project Locat FIGURE 2 - PM Peak Hour Trip Distribution ...................... 7 i The Kinsale Partnership is proposing to build a free standing medical office building located in Clearwater, Florida (See Figure 1). Located on the southeast corner of Belcher Road and N.E. Coachman Road, the.-Allergy and Asthma-Centre will consist of approximately 5,000 square feet of leasable, space with on-site parking spaces: The proposed center will have two points of access, one connecting to N.E. Coachman Rd and the other to Sharkey Rd respectively. The purpose of this report is to analyze the impact that the Allergy and Asthma Centre may have on the adjacent roadways and intersections. Extensive research was conducted and supporting data (actual field studies) were accumulated in reaching the conclusions and recommendations. The primary objectives of the traffic impact study were to: • identify potential traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development; and • determine whether or not that traffic exceeds applicable roadway capacity thresholds on the adjacent roadway system (which, if exceeded, would result in the need to prepare a detailed traffic impact study for purposes of determining roadway level of service concurrency). To ensure that the additional traffic generated by the Allergy and Asthma Centre will work efficiently and safely, while meeting the needs of the involved agencies, BRW, Inc., was retained by the Kinsale Partnership to conduct a traffic analysis. The findings and recommen- dations of the study are presented in this report. STUDYPROCEDURES This report was prepared using the most recent information available by national and local standards. Detailed field inspections were conducted at the existing site to obtain an inventory of the existing roadway parameters, established traffic patterns, land use and driveway loca- tions. The study consisted of identifying potential development-generated traffic, distributing 1 City of Clearwater Project Location Map Figure 1 Legend R Allergy and N Asthma Center BRW, Inc. 2 that traffic to the adjacent road network, and finally, comparing that traffic to the appropriate service volume or "capacity" thresholds for each of those road segments. The following procedures were utilized in developing this report: ' • A field inspection of the site to review the roadway geometry, signalization within the study area, speed limits, observe traffic patterns and proposed points of access. ' • BRW followed Florida Department of Transportation's Guidelines for As essing the Impact of Private Development on the State Highway System in conducting the study. • BRW conducted field counts of traffic patterns at the site and adjacent roadways to be studied. ' • An analysis of existing conditions taking into consideration BRW's knowledge of unusual travel characteristics for this site. • Identified service volumes or "capacity" thresholds for the impact area. ' • Prepared analysis based upon factual information provided by the City of Clear- water, Pinellas County, the existing site and BRW's research. ' • Finalized the findings and recommendations with the Kinsale Partnership and the approval agencies. DEVELOPMENT SITE LOCATION The existing site for the Allergy and Asthma Centre, will be developed on a 17.54 acre site and is located on the southeast corner at the intersection of Belcher Rd and N.E. Coachman Rd in Clearwater, Florida. DEVELOPMENT SITEACCESS Direct access to the site will consist of: • one (1) access driveway onto N.E. Coachman Rd; and • one (1) access driveway onto Sharkey Rd. Both driveways will serve the on-site parking lot. 3 The following sections describe the physical characteristics of the surrounding street systems: TRAFFICASSESSMENT Belcher Road: a north-south, 4-lane minor arterial roadway. Between Drew St and N.E. Coachman Rd, Belcher is undivided, with a median dividing the roadway from N.E. Coachman Rd north. Average daily traffic volumes (ADT) for 1989/1990 on Belcher Rd are 31,360 as obtained by the City of Clearwater Planning Department. The Pinellas County Planning Department has established a level of service (LOS) "D\E" for this section of roadway. This means that the segment of Belcher Rd between Sunset Point Rd and Drew St is borderline backlogged. N.E. Coachman Road: a 2-lane undivided minor arterial that extends east\west from Drew St to McMullen-Booth Rd. Average daily traffic volumes (ADT) for 1989/1990 on N.E. Coachman Rd are 16,307 east of Belcher Rd, and 16,700 west of Belcher Rd. These 1990 counts were obtained from the City of Clearwater Planning Department. The Florida Depart- ment of Transportation has established a level of service (LOS) "D" for this state minor arterial. Sharks Road: a 2-lane undivided local road that extends east\west from Belcher Rd to Coachman Rd. CAPACITY THRESHOLDS As stated above; the primary objective of the traffic study was to compare potential develop- ment-generated traffic to certain capacity "thresholds" in order to determine whether or not the magnitude of the proposed development warrants the need to prepare a detailed traffic impact study. Applicable "thresholds" for each roadway in the impact area are equal to 1 percent of the peak-hour service volume. The applicable threshold for "backlogged" facilities is 140 average daily trips. Since Belcher Rd is at the threshold of being classified a "backlogged" facility in the impact area, the measurement of 140 average daily trips will be utilized for analysis. Therefore, the following thresholds were used in preparing the impact study analysis: 4 NOTE: Trip Generation estimates based on rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (4th Ed.). TABLE Z .... ;::.....:::. DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC vs: CAPACITY'.THRESHOLDS .. '><` " LOS "D" Existin g Traffic Development Traffic LOS "D" PM PM PM 1 Percent 140 ADT Daily Peak Hour Daily Pk-Hr Daily Pk-Hr Threshold Threshold Roadway Segment Ser Vol Ser Vol Volume Volume Volume Volume Exceeded? Exceeded? Belcher Rd Drew St to Sunset Point Rd 34,900 3,350 31,360 3,136 54 8 No No N.E. Coachman Rd Drew St to Belcher Rd 16,500 1,580 16,700 1,670 43 6 No No Belcher Rd to U.S. 19 16,500 1,580 16,307 1,631 11 1 No No NOTE: LOS D Service Volumes based on FDOT Generalized Service Volume Tables; Urban, Group A. 6 • Belcher Rd -140 daily vehicles • N.E. Coachman Rd -West of Belcher Rd - 17 vehicles -East of Belcher Rd - 16 vehicles One of the greatest concerns raised by approval agencies is the amount of new traffic that will be generated by a development. To ensure that all issues of transportation nature have been addressed, the following agencies were contacted for discussion on the report contents: • City of Clearwater Planning and Community Development • City of Clearwater Traffic Operations • Pinellas County Planning Department • FDOT District Seven - Planning The following sections pertain to the future conditions as evaluated utilizing state-of-the-art procedures. ' PROJECT TRIP GENERATION The projected traffic that is expected by the site has been estimated using the Institute of ' Transportation Engineers (TTE) Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition. Table 1 represents the project trip generation estimates on a daily and peak hour basis. The estimates were based upon a land use designation of medical office building and a total build-out of leasable space of 5,000 square feet. PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ' It is very important to understand from which directions patrons will approach or depart the subject project so that site traffic can be assigned to the roadway system in order to identify ' potential problem areas. Typically, the major portion of traffic generated by most land uses represents trips to and from home. The distribution of development-generated traffic to the adjacent roadway network was determined based on general knowledge of the area, the relative location of the project within the area and traffic and land-use characteristics of a medical office building (See Figure 2). 7 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES The pm peak hour directional volumes were estimated based upon the trip generation estimates, the project traffic distribution and turning movement counts conducted by BRW, Inc. In utilizing the volumes as discussed in the Future Conditions section of this report, pm peak hour traffic volumes were established for the year 1990 with and without project traffic. Once these volumes were verified, the FDOT generalized service volume tables, Group "A," were used to determine the level of service on the roadways. Pinellas County Planning and Community Development has established this section of Belcher Rd as a level of service "D\E" on a daily basis. The Florida Department of Transportation has established N.E. Coachman Rd as a level of service "D" on a daily basis. As illustrated in Table 2, the addition of the project traffic will not cause a degradation of the existing level of service for the adjacent roadways, and meets the threshold standards of the City of Clearwater. In addition to the roadway peak hour level of service, the driveways were analyzed using the ' 1985 Highway Capacity software. The driveway along N.E. Coachman Rd will operate at LOS B while the driveway along Sharkey Rd will operate at LOS A. For further information or ' reviewing of the capacity runs, please see the appendix at the end of this report. ON-SITE PARKING Parking will be provided on the southeastern part of the property, with approximately 24 general purpose parking spaces and 2 handicapped parking spaces. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS There are no capacity improvements programmed within the vicinity of the project by the Florida Department of Transportation, Pinellas County, or the City of Clearwater. BRW, Inc., has thoroughly researched and evaluated the existing and future transportation conditions for the Allergy and Asthma Centre to be located on the southeast corner of Belcher Rd and N.E. Coachman Rd in Clearwater, Florida. 8 The distribution of traffic reveals a fairly even percentage of arrivals from the north and south areas of the project. Both Belcher Rd and N.E. Coachman Rd have an acceptable level of service, and the development of the Allergy and Asthma Centre does not generate enough traffic to effect the performance of these corridors. Both access points have been properly designed to provide safe and efficient access: • The project does not generate traffic volumes that would require any improve- ments to N.E. Coachman Rd. This access point accounts for approximately 66 percent of the total traffic entering/exiting the project. • The access point utilizing Sharkey Road accounts for approximately 33 percent of the total traffic entering/exiting the project, and acts as a connector to Belcher Road. • The project does not generate traffic volumes that would require any improve- ments to Belcher Rd. • Peak hour driveway conditions operate at an acceptable level of service "B" for N.E. Coachman Rd movements, and level of service "A" for Sharkey Road move- ments. Given that the proposed Allergy and Asthma Centre will generate a total of 108 new trips per day, the connections along N.E. Coachman Rd and Sharkey Rd should be classified as a "Category II - Minor Connection" which does not require a traffic study or performance bond. RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the summary of findings, discussions with the reviewing agencies and knowledge of the area, BRW concludes that there are minimal impacts by this development to the transportation network and intersections within the study area. Project traffic does not lower the accepted level of service, thus the project should be approved as designed. 9 APPENDIX I Driveway Capacity Analyses 10 0 t 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT r*w*,rwr*?***«*,w*******,tr,wrtrtr?ww*r***r?+r*?*,r*rr+**ww**w***w?,twrw,t*#*w********* INTERSECTION..N.E. Coachman Rd/Belcher Rd AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... RAR DATE.......... 11-13-1990 TIME.......... PM Peak Hour COMMENT....... Existing Traffic -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB W8 NB SO EB WB NB SB LT 356 130 6 53 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 504 338 1206 950 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 25 36 102 236 R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (Y) (X) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 4 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PII-4 ER LT X X NO LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X X PD X X PD GREEN 14.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 46.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.826 0.475 34.7 D 37.3 D T 0.893 0.333 40.1 E R 0.045 0.383 17.6 C WB L 0.320 0.475 15.1 C 23.0 C T 0.599 0.333 26.5 D R 0.065 0.383 17.8 C NB L 0.000 0.475 0.0 A 26.2 D T 0.866 0.400 26.3 D S8 L 0.000 0.475 0.0 A 27.2 D T 0.683 0.400 28.7. D -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 28.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.801 LOS = D 11 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *w**wwwfr*r**w***•rw*ww*wwwr*?*,w*w*,rtrrrtw,tw**r*****w*?,trr?,rr,t**rt?ww*,t*w,tr*vt,w* INTERSECTION..N.E. Coachman Rd/gelcher Rd AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... RAR DATE.......... 11-15-90 TIME.......... PM Peak Hour COMMENT....... Existing + Project Traffic -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : Ell NB NB SB LT 356 130 6 54 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 506 341 1206 950 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 25 39 102 236 R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (Y) (Y) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 3 WB •0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 - 5 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0. 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 4 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 25.8 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ES LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X X PD X X PD GREEN 14.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 46.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.836 0.475 35.8 D 38.0 D T 0.897 0.333 40.5 E R 0.045 0.383 17.6 C WB L 0.320 0.475 15.1 C 23.0 C T 0.604 0.333 26.6 D R 0.071 0.383 17.8 C NB L 0.000 0.475 0.0 A 26.2 D T 0.866 0.400 26.3 D SB L 0.000 0.475 0.0 A 27.1 D T 0.683 0.400 28.7 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 28.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.804 LOS = D 12 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... AREA POPULATION ...................... NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. OTHER INFORMATION.... Existing + Proj INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------- 30 1 150000 N.E. Coachman Rd Asthma Centre RAR 11-14-1990 PM Peak Hour ect ----------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: YIELD SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 0 0 6 -- THRU 659 504 0 -- RIGHT 4 0 1 -- NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 -- 13 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE --- ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS ---------------- FOR RIGHT TURNS ----------------- EASTBOUND ---- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 35 N SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- - VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------- ------------ ------------------ -------------------- % SU TRUCKS $ COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- CRITICAL GAPS --------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- -------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT ----------- CRITICAL GAP ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... N.E. Coachman Rd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Asthma Centre DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11-14-1990 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Existing + Project 14 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 216 216 RIGHT 1 590 590 MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 0 589 589 > 216 > 210 > C > 238 > 230 >C > 590 > 589 > A 589 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 589 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... N.E. Coachman Rd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Asthma Centre DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11-14-1990 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Existing + Project 15 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... AREA POPULATION ...................... NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. OTHER INFORMATION.... Existing + Proj INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------- 30 1 150000 Sharkey Road Asthma Centre RAR 11-14-1990 PM Peak Hour ect -------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: YIELD SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 1 0 -- , 0 THRU 100 100 -- 0 RIGHT 4 0 -- 4 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -- 1 16 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE ------- ---------- FOR RIGHT T ----------- URNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ---- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 - ------- ---------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 35 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- SU TRUCKS $ COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES -------- MOTORCYCLES --- ---- EASTBOUND 0 --------- 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ------------------------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE - ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ------- ----------- ------------ SB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Sharkey Road NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Asthma Centre DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11-14-1990 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Existing + Project 17 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 0 RIGHT 4 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 1 794 794 1000 1000 1000 1000 > 794 > > 1000 > 996 > 1000 > 1000 794 > A >A 996 > A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 999 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Sharkey Road NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Asthma Centre DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11-14-1990 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION.... Existing + Project 18