The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2010-08004; 40 DEVON DR; SEA CAPTAINw FLD2010-08004 40 DEVON DR Date Received: 8/3/2010 9:22:57 AM Sea Captain ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist LAND USE: Resort Facilities High (30 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: PLANNER: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager CDB Meeting Date: December 21, 2010 Case Number: FLD2010-08004 (Related to DVA2010-08001) Agenda Item: C.2. (Related to D.1.) Owner/Applicant: Sea Captain, a Florida General Partnership, Donald Eifert, Partner Representative: Steve Fowler, Fowler Associates, Architects, Inc. Address: 40 Devon Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application (1) to permit an 85-unit overnight accommodation use (hotel) in the Tourist (T) District with a total lot area of 36,137 square feet (0.829 acre) (28,733 square feet [0.659 acre] zoned Tourist District and 7,404 square feet [0.17 acre] zoned Low Medium Density Residential District), a lot width of 174.94 feet, a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking), a building height of 75.25 feet (to top of roof deck) and 93 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.C, and approval of a two-year ucvciuBuieut order; and (2) -*Increase the permitted density Uy the allocation of 53 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District (0.659 acre) and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District (0.17 acre) CURRENT LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) and Residential Urban (RU) BEACH BYDESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Small Motel PROPERTY USE: Current Use: 27-room motel Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use (hotel) of a total of 85 rooms (128.98 rooms/acre on the acreage zoned Tourist (T) District, including the allocation of 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve), approximately 7,986 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel and a height of 75.25 feet (to top of roof deck) Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 1 of 12 EXISTING North. Preservation (P) District SURROUNDING Cleonvater Harbor (City marina) ZONING AND USES: South: Tourist (T) District and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Parking lot and Detached dwellings East: Preservation (P) District Clearwater Harbor West: Tourist (T) District Vacant (approved for Overnight accommodations) ANAI.VCi.C- Site Location and Existing Conditions: The total 0.829 acre parcel is located on the north side of Devon Drive, approximately 150 feet east of Coronado Drive. The subject property is currently developed with a 27-room motel. The subject site has approximately 175 feet of frontage along Devon Drive. The majority of the subject property (0.659 acre) is zoned Tourist (T) District, but the eastern portion (0.17 acre) of the subject property north of the adjacent detached dwelling at 94 Devon Drive is zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and is not part of Beach by Design. Parking for the existing motel is primarily located within the LMDR-zoned area. There are 10 existing boat slips. The property to the west and southwest at 101 Coronado Drive is currently vacant but was approved by the CDB on May 19, 2009, for a 108-room hotel (FLD2009-03013/DVA2009- 00001 - Holiday Inn Express, now to be a Hampton Inn). This hotel building will be located on the property adjacently west of the subject property, at a height of 89 feet (to top of roof deck). The southern portion of this hotel will be developed with an accessory surface parking lot for the hotel. The property on the west side of Coronado Drive (100 Coronado Drive) has been approved for a 450-room hotel (Kirin Grande - FLD2008-05013/DVA2008-00001) at a height of 150 feet (to top of roof deck). There exists across Devon Drive a 25-space City parking lot (FLD2005- 08089). Other overnight accommodation uses exist to the south of the subject property in the block between Coronado and Devon/Hamden Drives. Additionally, the Aqualea/Hyatt overnight accommodation project, attached dwellings and public parking garage is located to the southwest at 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard. Properties to the south on the east side of Devon Drive are zoned LMDR District, are not part of Beach by Design and are developed with detached dwellings. Clearwater Harbor exists to the north and east of the subject property, developed with the City marina. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct an 85-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 128.98 rooms/acre (based on only the lot acreage zoned T District), which includes the allocation of 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. The proposal also includes approximately 7,986 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel (restaurant/lounge, fitness center, meeting room and banquet room), which represents approximately 9.91 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel, in compliance with recently adopted Code provisions. This is the fifth hotel to be placed on the Community Development Board agenda since the amendment of Beach by Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 2 of 12 Design in July 2008 creating the Hotel Density Reserve as a means to encourage the construction of new mid-size hotels on the beach in response to the loss of hotel rooms since 2002. Also on this CDB agenda is a companion Development Agreement (DVA2010-08001) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for the allocation of the 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. This Development Agreement provides for mandatory evacuation/closure of the hotel in the event of the posting of a hurricane watch including Clearwater Beach by the National Hurricane Center, which also complies with Beach by Design criteria. The applicant indicates room rates for this hotel will be reasonably priced for a family beach vacation contrasted with the Sandpearl and Aqualea/Hyatt resorts. This proposal complies with the Beach by Design criteria to access all rooms through a lobby and internal corridors. The proposed 85-room hotel is proposed on a total lot acreage of 0.829 acres, however, the east 0.17 acre portion of the site is zoned LMDR District (not part of Beach by Design). The proposed site design locates the building, pool/pool deck and all other hardscape improvements on that portion zoned T District. The eastern portion of the site zoned LMDR District is proposed for only open space and the retention pond. The hotel is proposed at a height of 75.25 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof deck. Driveway access is from Devon Drive. The proposal includes a porte cochere and drop-off area off Devon Drive. The ground level of this hotel provides the hotel lobby and 4,365 square feet of accessory restaurant/lounge. The ground through third floor of this hotel provides a total of 93 parking spaces. The fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth floors provide 17 rooms per floor. All parking garage levels will be open for natural ventilation. Balconies are provided for guest rooms on the south, east and north sides of the hotel building. The proposed 75.25-foot building height for this project transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive (Kirin Grande, 100 Coronado Drive - 150-foot height), to the parcel adjacently west approved for a hotel (Holiday Inn Express/Hampton Inn, 101 Coronado Drive - 89-foot height), to the to the detached dwellings to the south of this site on Devon Drive (30-foot maximum height). The exterior base and body colors of the building will be primarily Sandbank and Lightweight Beige. The applicant also proposes to install a Boston Blend of applied field stone at the bottom of the base of the building. Window awnings will be Sprout Green and trim will be Arcade White. There is a proposed panel on the south side of the building, basically lining up with Hamden Drive for the installation of public art mural. An existing masonry wall along the west property line is intended to be retained, although a portion is partially on the adjacent parcel, which will require an easement from the adjacent property owner. The proposal includes a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk) and a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking). The main portion of the building is actually set back further from the front property line a minimum of 17.3 feet, with only a porte-cochere located at a front setback of 6.2 feet (to the supporting columns). All areas within the front setback provided will be landscaped to enhance the site and building. Existing docks on the north side of the site will be retained for guests of the hotel. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-407 specifies that an application for a building permit must Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 3 of 12 be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation rooms per acre. Based on the lot acreage of only that portion of the property zoned T District of 0.659 acre and the base density of 50 rooms/acre, a maximum of 32 rooms is permitted. Based on the same lot acreage and the maximum density under the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925-08) of 150 rooms per acre, a maximum of 98 rooms is permissible. When the base density number of rooms is subtracted from the overall maximum under the Hotel Density Reserve, the maximum number of rooms the applicant could request from the Hotel Density Reserve is 66 rooms. The applicant is only requesting 53 rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve. As such, the proposed density is 128.98 rooms/acre, which is less than the maximum permissible established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.938, based on only that area zoned T District, which is consistent with the Code provisions. It is noted that the 0.17 acre zoned LMDR District is proposed as a retention pond and open space, with no impervious surfaces. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 - 20,000 square feet. The lot area for that portion of the subject property zoned T District is 28,733 square feet. The eastern 7,404 square feet of the subject property is zoned LMDR District. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 - 150 feet. The lot width along Devon Drive is approximately 175 feet. The proposal exceeds these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to the same CDC Table 2-803, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations uses can range between 0 - 15 feet, while the minimum side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between 0 - 20 feet. The proposal includes a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk) and a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking). The main portion of the building is set back a minimum of 17.3 feet at the southeast corner of the building, with only a porte cochere located at a front setback of 6.2 feet (to the supporting columns). The pavement for the hotel drop-off is proposed to be set back 8.5 feet. For a point of comparison, the proposed hotel directly west of this site was approved with a front setback (to building) of five feet (to both Devon Drive and Coronado Drive, as the adjacent site is a corner lot). This proposal includes a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk). It is noted that Building Code provisions for required egress routes be a paved surface and, in this case, the egress route is from the stairwell at the northwest corner of Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 4 of 12 the building out to the public sidewalk. This is the reason the sidewalk is located at a zero side setback. For a point of comparison, the proposed hotel directly west of this site was approved with a side setback to the same common property line of this site of 2.5 feet (to building) for only the first four floors of the parking garage for two building bump-outs designed to break up the linear facade on the east side of the building, while the protruding columns from the face of the wall are set back a minimum of 6.1 feet and the majority of the east wall of that building is set back approximately 73 feet from this common property line. The proposal includes a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking). For a point of comparison, the proposed hotel directly west of this site was approved with a setback to the north property line of 19.29 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pool deck). It is noted that there are no proposed setback reductions on the east side of the property. The pool and pool deck, as well as other hardscape surfaces, are located at the edge of the T District boundary line and the balance of the property (zoned LMDR District) on the east side of the property will be developed with a retention pond and open space. Unit balconies are contained within the main structure, except on the east side of the building where the balconies cantilever 1.33 feet from the main building structure. The proposed setbacks to the building and to other structures are not out of scale of the newer hotels that have been approved and/or constructed on Clearwater Beach. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to the same CDC Table 2-803, the maximum allowable height for overnight accommodation uses can range between 35 - 100 feet. The proposed building is 75.25 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof, which is below the Code maximum. This site is located within the Small Motel character district of Beach by Design, which does not prescribe any maximum heights for this area. Good planning practice is to transition building heights from a compatibility standpoint. The Kirin Grande hotel project (100 Coronado Drive) on the west side of Coronado Drive has been approved at a building height of 150 feet (to top of roof deck). The Holiday Inn Express/Hampton Inn overnight accommodation project adjacent to the west at 101 Coronado Drive was approved with an 89-foot (to top of roof deck) building height. The detached dwellings on Devon Drive to the south of this site are zoned LMDR District, where the maximum building height is 30 feet. The proposed building height for this project transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive to the detached dwellings to the south of this site. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum off-street parking requirement for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to the same CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required parking for overnight accommodations can range between 1.0 - 1.2 parking spaces per room, or a minimum of 102 required spaces. The parking garage for this hotel includes a total of 93 parking spaces. A Parking Reduction Study has been submitted as part of the application material, which has analyzed the parking demand against the proposed parking supply. This study concludes that adequate parking will be available on-site to service the proposed use for guests and employees. Forty percent (40%) of the employees are presumed to need to park on-site. From an amenities standpoint accessory to the hotel, the proposal includes a restaurant/lounge on the first floor of 4,365 square feet, a fitness center of 1,207 square feet on the fifth floor, a meeting room of 1,207 square feet on the sixth floor and a banquet room of 1,207 square feet on the seventh floor, or a Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 5 of 12 total of 7,986 square feet (9.91% of the gross floor area of the hotel). With such minimal amenities, the provided parking appears adequate for guests and employees. The primary driveway on Devon Drive providing access to the parking garage is proposed on the western portion of the south side of the building. A proposed driveway on the east side of the property, which lines up with Hamden Drive, will provide access to the drop-off porte cochere and to the staging area for the solid waste dumpsters. A sidewalk will be constructed along the frontage of Devon Drive where no sidewalk presently exists, increasing pedestrian safety along Devon Drive. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located on top of the flat roof of the building. The location of the mechanical equipment and the building parapets surrounding the roof appear to be sufficient to screen the mechanical equipment. This screening of the mechanical equipment will also be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Devon Drive, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20- foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles, as well as any landscaping planted within the Devon Drive right-of-way, will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.13, to enhance views of the water, no structures or landscaping may be installed within 20-foot waterfront sight visibility triangles. This proposal does not propose any landscaping other than turf within the waterfront sight visibility triangles, complying with this provision. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this hotel will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. There exist overhead utility lines within the right-of-way along the north side of Devon Drive that will need to be undergrounded, consistent with the approved hotel adjacently west at 101 Coronado Drive with similar circumstances of overhead utilities in the Devon Drive right-of-way. It is unknown of the location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this hotel. If located exterior to the building, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building to ensure views are minimized. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.1), there are no perimeter buffers required in the T District for this site. This proposal meets or exceeds the required minimum five-foot wide building foundation landscape area along Devon Drive, as the majority of the foundation planting area is located between the drop-off driveway and the front property line (8.5-foot width). There is additional foundation planting area adjacent to the building west of the porte cochere and within a Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 6 of 12 large planting area on the west side of the western driveway. The site will be planted with various palm trees (pindo, Mediterranean fan and senegal date), shrubs (bird of paradise, firebush and Croton) and ground covers (lily, cardboard fern, liriope, lantana, beach sunflower and philodendron). Landscaping assists with softening and reducing building massing to both pedestrians and motorists. Since the sidewalk planned in the Devon Drive right-of-way will be adjacent to the street curb, landscaping is also planned within the right-of-way of Devon Drive, which will require a Right-of-Way Use Permit. Solid Waste: A dumpster enclosure is proposed at the southeast corner of the building. Hotel housekeeping staff will remove trash from hotel units. The trash staging area is located outside of the trash enclosure. On trash days, hotel employees will place the dumpster(s) outside the building in the trash staging area for truck pickup. After dumping, hotel employees will roll the dumpster(s) back inside the trash enclosure out of view. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: The proposal does not include a freestanding sign at this time. However, any future freestanding sign should be designed as a monument-style sign, match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six-foot height through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Attached signage must meet Code requirements. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section C.1 of Beach by Design requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed hotel building footprint is approximately 16,573 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 126 feet along Hamden Drive and 134 feet deep (nortb/south plane), while the vertical plane is 75.25 feet from grade to the top of the flat roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. All facades of the building have been designed in compliance with this requirement, with the largest linear dimension of approximately 79.67 feet along the western portion of the north fagade of the building. All other portions of the building fagade are modulated with at least a five-foot deviation. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application indicates compliance with this requirement. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Palge 7 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 rooms per acre 8> rooms X (128.98 rooms per acre)' Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.938 X' Minimum Lot Area N/A 36,137 sf total (28,733 sf zoned T X' District & 7,404 sf zoned LMDR District) Minimum Lot Width N/A 174.94 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (t X3 pavement) Side: N/A West: Five feet (to building) and X3 zero feet (to sidewalk) Rear: N/A 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet x3 (to patio decking) Maximum Height N/A 75.25 feet (from BFE to flat roof) X3 Minimum N/A 93 parking spaces Xa Off-Street Parkin i Includes 53 units/rooms allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve pursuant to Beach by Design and is based on only the land area Zoned Tourist (T) District '- Based on only the land area =oned Tourist (T) District 3 See analysis in Staff Report a Based on Parking Reduction Study; See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 8 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X1 the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X1 category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or a. The proposed use. provides for the development of a new and/or nreservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X1 parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. i See analysis in Staff Report. Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 9 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent I. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X covera-e, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion- X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X1 immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X1 visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. i See analysis in Stuff Report. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC),reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of September 2, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence > ....:.. a .. +i.. i:, ant and ? vi Luc vu,. 1-U1.,.u.,.u.,11uur+.r. rte, C11 Suvurrr?cu vy 'tile applicant rcCluircrircnw y 1JCVCrvyrr1crrL ?vuc, iuru? ular there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The total 0.829 acre parcel is located on the north side of Devon Drive, approximately 150 feet east of Coronado Drive; 2. The majority of the subject property (0.659 acre) is zoned T District, but the eastern portion (0.17 acre) of the subject property north of the adjacent detached dwelling at 94 Devon Drive is zoned LMDR District and is not part of Beach by Design; 3. The proposal is to construct an 85-un1it overnight accommodation use at a density of 128.98 rooms/acre, which includes the allocation of 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design, totally within the area zoned T District (only a retention pond and open space is proposed within the area zoned LMDR District); 4. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2010-08001) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda, providing for the allocation of the 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 5. The proposal also includes approximately 7,986 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel (restaurant/lounge, fitness center, meeting room and banquet room), which represents approximately 9.91 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel; 6. The hotel is proposed at a height of 75.25 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck; Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 10 of 12 7. The proposed 75.2540ot building height transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive (Kirin Grande at 100 Coronado Drive - 150-foot height), to the property adjacently west (Holiday Inn Express/Hampton Inn at 101 Coronado Drive - 89-foot height) to the detached dwellings to the south of this site (30-foot maximum height); 8. The around through third floors of this hotel on this subject property provide a total of 93 parking spaces; 9. The proposal includes setback reductions from all property lines, except the east side of the property zoned LMDR District; 10. The proposal includes a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk) and a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking); and 11. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 801C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code, and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planninv- and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application (1) to permit an 85-unit overnight accommodation use (hotel) in the Tourist (T) District with a total lot area of 36,137 square feet (0.829 acre) (28,733 square feet [0.659 acre] zoned Tourist District and 7,404 square feet [0.17 acre] zoned Low Medium Density Residential District), a lot width of 174.94 feet, a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking), a building height of 75.25 feet (to top of roof deck) and 93 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.C, and approval of a two-year development order; and (2) increase the permitted density by the allocation of 53 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2010-08001); 2. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than December 21, 2012, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permit a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; Commlmity Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 -Page 1 1 of 12 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six-foot height through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 6. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 7. That, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel and accessory docks be submitted and approved by the City for all guests of the hotel; 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, an easement be obtained to retain the existing four- foot high wall along the west property line that extends onto the adjoining parcel; 9. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, plans be revised to show mirrors and/or other devices to aid motorists with blind spots in the parking garage; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, balconies for the President/Bridal Suites be shown on the floor plans, ensuring a maximum building plane on the north side of 100 feet before there is a minimum five-foot deviation; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, existing overhead utility lines within the right-of-way along the north side of Devon Drive be placed underground; 12. That site lighting and pedestrian area bollard lighting be shown on plans prior to the issuance of the building permit; 13. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from Devon Drive, be painted the same color as the building; 14. That use of the docks be for exclusive use for the mooring of boats by guests of this hotel and that the docks are not permitted to be rented, leased or sold separately from use by guests of this hotel; 15. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, provide a copy of a submerged land lease, if required; 16. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Right-of-Way Use Permit be obtained to permit landscaping plants within the Devon Drive right-of-way; 17. That all Parks and Recreation fees and any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 18. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map, Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs S: (Planning DeparnnentlC D BIFLE,Y (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIDevon 40 Sea Captain Motel (T) 2010-Ox- 12.21.10 CDB - WWRTIDevon 40 FLD Staff Report.doc Community Development Board- December 21, 2010 FLD2010-08004 - Page 12 of 12 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft a,mVclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ¦ Development Review Manager City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present Direct Development Review activities for the City. Supervise professional planners, land resource specialists and administrative staff. Conduct performance reviews. Serve as staff to the Community Development Board. ¦ Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ¦ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. ¦ Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida Performed technical review of and prepared staff Performed reviews of building permit applications ordinances, land development regulations, codes, professionals and the public. October 1999 to March 2001 reports for site plan development applications. Provided information on land use applications, and related planning programs/services to other EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida SAN qut72Cp /_ ? lt! n? N I,? pO?P . ? rn PAPAYA ST 2 } Q E r? DORY PH ° z { s' WiNDWA PROJECT SITE SECOND ?Firn. St ? ` DR THIRD 3: St 44 a z a 00 (? SR T VVAT?R DR FIFTH ST g BAYSIDE z o S'A VW Q erz) SL ? r?.. Location Map Owner: Donald F. Eifert and Eifert Properties, Inc. Cases: FLD2010-08004 D V A20 1 0-0800 1 Site: 40 Devon Drive Property Size: 0.829 total acre 0.659 acre zoned Tourist PIN: 08-29-15-00000-320-0300 Atlas Page: 276A L ------ 98. o c h Q i z h N OS/R 4 0000 P 101 105 100 v° 94 10 98 N 207 G) 212 T C r- 209LDCTR ^oo < 213 RI 218 217 W 216 ^*0 ECOND ST 221 ° v 224 h " m 225 ^^ '` ^ ^ 229 ,y n 301 THIRD S7' T;Ti? Zoning Map Owner: Donald F. Eifert and Eifert Properties, Inc. Cases: FLD2010-08004 DVA2010-08001 Site: 40 Devon Drive Property Size: 0.829 total acre 0.659 acre zoned Tourist PIN: 08-29-15-00000-320-0300 Atlas Page: 276A A 60 ep A c m 2 city a 59 " sAr t marina ,5606 I 13 1 12 parkil&?O-t ? i - - - , I I Pier 60 1 1 city I parking lot I I Marina WATER LOT 1 a ,y, w I i I l (14) 1 a°on°?°c° ?....? ? I 0 I up I s^ A 1 0 57,8 1 59 Ie? GOVT LOT 3 _ _ - 7 I 35 _ ? 44L?(((????9s?147 190 91 ? 92 IN t I I c Vµ 105 32N3 GOVT LOT 4 1I s? 4 09115 1 ? P eRC L ? ` ? _ - _ a at ap _ Too $ 2 o Beach ^ ? I - _ I I I 1 V 3 d _ _ _ ? I Iqg 1/g 1W 151 94 % 9 1 - I? 97 6 (ap r dwellin 2 F y _I 1 ` ) 1 ote 98 -tn- - I VAapt96 207 5 6 ? _ I (apqpro a 20 t 3 1 12 p 00 r 'n @ o - I-- ? De ah < 218 %- I 54 1100 1 - -- _ v •gh l t 21 21 Q s tlo a c da 4 ell gs? ,o r- - L04914 - r 93 35 55 I_ 70 SE_ N'9I NS I g ? s i „ ^ 1.110 ry? 1Y to e _ 102 357p 56 - 3 Overnight ^ 221 4 3 52 ^h ^ryp ? ^1 te11$'g 15 16 2? - rt - - _ Sp ^o ? ? ? ? V tac ecf ^^ - - - c?ominYodattion ^ ^ 3 ' 22 d e ing ^" "h ?1vis? "" _ -? I _ 6@ dauil0 Ss w ry so ? / r - _ _ - 2 TH/RD ST 70 49 e?ac , IM well S/ ?. a Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Donald F. Eifert and Eifert Properties, Inc. Cases: FLD2010-08004 DVA20 1 0-0800 1 Site: 40 Devon Drive Property Size: 0.829 total acre 0.659 acre zoned Tourist PIN: 08-29-15-00000-320-0300 Atlas Page: 276A IiM P ?t ;.rh 11 Aerial Map Owner: Donald F. Eifert and Eifert Properties, Inc. Cases: FLD2010-08004 DVA2010-08001 Site: 40 Devon Drive Property Size: 0.829 total acre 0.659 acre zoned T PIN: 08-29-15-00000-320-0300 Atlas Page: 276A View looking NW from Hamden/Devon Drive at subject property 40 Devon Drive FLD2010-08004/DVA2010-08001 Page 1 of 2 View looking NE from Devon Drive at subject property View looking SE at east side subject property (eat portion zoned LMDR District; 94 Devon Drive in background) View looking NE at east side of subject property (east portion zoned LMDR District) View looking NW at accessory docks on north side of subject property (City Marina in background) 5 View looking NW from Devon Drive at northern portion of 101 Coronado Drive W of subject property (approved hotel) r' ?? I I View to SW at City parking lot S of subject property (Aqualea/ Hyatt in background) 40 Devon Drive FLD2010-08004/DVA2010-08001 Page 2 of 2 View looking SW from Devon Drive at southern portion of 101 Coronado Dr. (approved hotel; this area to be parking lot) View looking S at City parking lot S of subject property rlwto View looking E at detached dwellings at 94 and 98 Devon Drive S .of subject property (properties zoned LMDR District) of subject property -5rl? ? ri C e rwat Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION • SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ?x SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: : (Code Section 4-202.A) Sea Captain, a Florida General Partnership, Donald Eifert, Partner ................. _...__.__ 40 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 (727) 446-7550 FAX NUMBER: (727) 298-0100 n/a FAX NUMBER: info@seacaptainresort.com Sea Captain, a Florida General Partnership, Donald Eifert, Partner Steve Fowler, Fowler Associates, Architects, Inc. 1421 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 449-2021 N/A FAX NUMBER: (727) 447-5339 EMAIL: fowlerarch@ao PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Sea Captain Resort PROJECT VALUATION: $ 13.5 million STREET ADDRESS 40 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 08-29-15-00000-320-0300 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.829 acres [0.659 ac (T), 0.17 ac (LMDR)1 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 36,137 sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" PROPOSED USE(S): Hotel / Overnight accommodations DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Exhibit "B" Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 1 of 8 -, r 1 , Y DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES - NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) © SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) O Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "C" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Exhibit "C" 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Exhibit "C" 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Exhibit "C" 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "C" 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Exhibit "C" C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 2 of 8 l --,.L 1 I It WkITTEN"SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Exhibit "C" ........._ .. ......... ......... ......... ............ _._ ..................... ......... ......... ............_.. ............................................. ......... . .. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Exhibit "C" .................................................................................. .. ............................................................................................................................... .... ......_............................................. ... .. ...... ..--............................................... ...................................................................... .. ............. .................................... .............. . .............................. 1.1.1-1-1-11,111-I ......................................................................................................................................................... .... .......................... ................................... .. ...................................... ... ... .. ......................................- ......... .... .............. ............................................................................................ ............................... ...................... 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Exhibit "C" ------ ------ 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Exhibit "C" . ... ....................... ._..........._.................................................................. _.................. ............_...................... .......................... .............. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. ................ ...... . ............... .. .. .............. . ................. ...... ...... ............... ... . ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . See Exhibit "C" 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Changes in horizontal building planes; Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Variety in materials, colors and textures; Distinctive fenestration patterns; Building stepbacks; and Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See Exhibit "C" C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 3 of 8 E.? STOR WATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri; Manual and 4-202.A.21) © A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. * At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ?O Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; O Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; © A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. © Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable © ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): ? 3,3tormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) © SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; © TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; N/A - per pre-application meeting O LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; © PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; I@ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); N/A ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/A C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 4 of 8 A ,+ i t G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) © SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ................... Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; . . . . . . . . ............ All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ................... All existing and proposed points of access; ................... All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including ................... description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ................... All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and ................... Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. Z SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11); © FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; ................... Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ................... Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ................... Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 5 of 8 i - 1 4 It H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) © LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; ................... Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; ................... Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ................... Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all ................... existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes 19 REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11); 17 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) © BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials © REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 %2 X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) © Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 %2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 6 of 8 A K, .TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. (Sechon 020TA13 and 400tC) j hk !a t . j =e pst...l :-x wo 7v V chef d ,ed;i` v C<a d to aJu 1he r.> .t a- ti any r.,,3c{sa an WOW in Me _, t ;; ehy" 'arc. Hai, r. r??l1 a,r tf: 1E, i l;,f !di%?G .tFi,.F 'et L. {.,? ;;ria,-.! l:i;4t G1(3 e3i f zi (?:, ilaf.}! iii{..F't ?f ! ffzs i+f"PJ v.>hU. ._ rr tt£.f i3;;f }+. At A at a tawny ftl;ir Aay segment ar dhor arEt±wr;,t-oii n w di five, (5) teltoetable acu :gar' , i'' Sm is an Ole C HY s drrfitf 1 list a;f rnc:.t f1>?z,ar,iou? In%azmjvra.}.. `r . T,rraye,aadorr 4h,11€ tae teased Gn Tn umst n coo ariiwn Of the. h glut e of Tran:.Ecatw . ,:-jers (NEI fnl Genes! k1 iso The I r ...atc. imp acl ,`,ttady rrbi.. aYi fu RYiih d ?c aF?rte P.i t:fl tt?t irttlt Ih;r: (i s ac: t}(,, .Cltalte P,9,ara.a" dr _ i'rie; C j t CM ;itr !ea t4` o,r...,.6'}anent Coe sw ci.eEefrtm n5 to Rks qut n «+em, XI - alt- _ ant L' f ?"<iftt: s r ? ??? ?t =Jy rr ??? . cr.t e;1i? f,?pr?it?"2r?2 r'rtt;?t inroad raise r?4 tta? kda.?<? a?„? ?_ t-3ffi.: ' r.fl-}ca Study 4s T e i;.ady Must in_i.A>e a r3um rta=y wu? of W mid , ,p Jon" p mad WOO OO c „ r_: _ i_'v A g &I c J:tia s l} ESd ??a,ata brtnire;) rtlUvE a:a ttt ,a(l indc P?F ; (tGtr> a.i€ tisfa ..! .r :dam ;r'ut,irr? €.f?. Fi*tr. j r T(atfit lwpaGl `,>bjdy ', raft r Cku;rrx 1. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR R TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBtAITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. tf } ._ .r,". carnaact the CRY Pubic Wass -d.clo 7,=ai an Env-nowq ,almlei e-at, 72 1 o -t L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: vj"ko Fie Fox CaR,atatnwi v,.,riter Study by a FIRE PRC)TEC(TION ENGJNEEf? to dSfrrrt-- o W'cVWr..w_ W SW WY 6 atWd a'tr "Maw if !,(,f;t=m, we fequ aj by the devem{'e due to Me unpdO ta; 0 pr.jaA Ow watr,t vatiW;, niuk tea ,at>{t t strd„paa t trtr. .a€sw.. anad Nre -s st,ifi lpq a: ai&W Our pm W H a M p= T a tegia red the water :,urpfy must be We tf rpoy 150 M its wwo e, p ay t:'rri!€alow wi?'i ure ,4 . Florida f i€f € rt ur,ltia., €. , . i ! bc,r„?vu `. i't' 13, MIFF: 11 WA 20 vFF'A <31 and E.`,( t 14Z, <t, :x 3 [ rs t 7u?%,t; ate' ?tiz.4_ ._:f?d?t,,taut?C f;f h.v thr; .xt.?u€at €!->„va?tu! .,i::<S;r r? ;utr?ttaertYs (?;al;as.?stf na rte, in,'a<,= ?r.e,Fl+a,,. i,aih.??'v l;Ei_ V ''• Fie Ftr;w C: ?a€r >=:.,t..r „.u r a trlGiu.< r. r dl .ul.r- r t: trial t r u,rad- Fire Hoy CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN 'THE REQUIREMENT" FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MAST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. it g-.,. ,,Mg tHwe M,d,,l. „rorf.ntv i,crima M 0, Fire Pm na . „ L13i',,a,tcawW W W?t sa&A +-t M. SIGNATURE: ., tt lt, '.e .ia ylgmu, misle ;„STATE 0 FL-ua.Ii.,R,, 0i 7 wNEL[ : `,_x'.,ia` n t{t ilte5 3ppk:a1,on arc, E( to 4`o 1 a w ate° t!3 Diu C, _.at of My to 'S Clbso ettc d unkgf n"- U " s 14 May of ??: i a'i, fi i.t>?ft E 7t'y FiII ,t: ? ! '..I(i;? r .1F. _'?r w r?.. --i __ 1. ? } k ? s- },,9 f"r)t• 3 ?,f . l?.) I'f4` i a '`aF.i? tttY: l} ? AL -?1 ?,. ?. ,-! .. T' C ??? t' 7 }- ... Ya R r i.. i ^" ?l t?t? !? f f..? 43?a lafk Ff? ?a? = ff? { F ? j? ?- e 3? ffn?€-xaf ?,aOUkl ? A ' P a s i j l l aE, °,„ ON ism -a ?- toy '(. } •?" ftp i?4Hr 't`!k)?.di}f ?.u+?'tf7 l? ,ri.I a 1 ° ? - C eta !J7 ? ?U tai .i4 fI laf, t' a-je..a t:af i? t.:?..« .a-•?«.?'. _ ._ .. ..-"'-': '`? ,? I •l N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: =?r-l till 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Sea Captian Resort, 40 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 8 Overnight Accommodations 4- That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Stephen R. Fowler, AIA, NCARB Brian Barker, PE as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this appfication and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we the and gn au ty a certify that the foregoing is true and correct Property weer' Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS of Florida, on this day of State Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the ( r A y , Jb Ji 0 personally appeared v n a _? / F2r? who having been first duly sworn Deposes Iand says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. TERESA SPINOWITZ / MY COMMISSION N DD 755335 9 • EXPIRES: February 13, 2012 BMW T x" Nfty wulc uoeervrrnen N ry Public ignature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT "A" SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION UPLAND PARCEL The following is a description of the uplands lying between the existing seawall and the deed described boundary lines. Lots 1 and 2, A REPLAT OF BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Pages 18 and 19, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH a portion of Hamilton Drive right-of-way vacated per Resolution no. 67-94. AND Unplatted lands lying in Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida Described as follows: Begin at the Southwest corner of Water Lot 1, CITY PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and run thence West along the East and West centerline of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, 15.00 feet to the Easterly line of Coronado Drive; thence S.05°32'30"W., 116.26 feet to the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence S.84°27'30"E., 100.00 feet along the Northerly line of First Avenue and the Point of Beginning. Thence N.05032'30"W., 178.84 feet to a point on the seawall, said point also being Point "A" for the submerged land description; thence running with the seawall the following courses: S.83042'47"E., 78.40 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 159.25 feet, a delta of 36°34'54", arc of 101.68 feet, chord of 99.96 feet, bearing S.65°25'20"E.; thence S.47-07'53 "E., 12.96 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 116.10 feet, a delta of 16°50'13", arc of 34.12 feet, chord of 33.99 feet, bearing S.38042'46"E.; thence S30°17'39"E., 107.53 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 52.45 feet, a delta of 8°25'14", arc of 7.71 feet, chord of 7.70 feet, bearing S.26°05'03"E. to the intersection of the South property line of said Lot 2; thence leaving said seawall, non tangent to the previous course, run along the South line of said Lot 2, N84°27'30"W. a distance 104.21 feet to a point; thence run S.70°27'50"W. a distance of 45.94 feet to a point of intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of First Avenue; thence along said right-of-way line a distance of 128.00 feet, N.84°27'30"W. to the Point of Beginning. I EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECT B. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant, Mr. Donald Eifert, proposes to redevelop the property described in the attached Exhibit "A" with a multi-story hotel. The property is currently developed and operating as a two-story motel. Two separate zoning designations encompass the parcel, Tourist and LMDR. The areas covered by the zoning designations are 0.659 acres and 0.17 acres respectively. The hotel is proposed to be constructed entirely within the Tourist District. Specifically, the applicant requests flexible development approval of a comprehensive infill project to permit an 85 unit hotel in the Tourist District and, with: a. a Lot Area of 0.659 acres (28,733 square feet), where 20,000 square feet is required. b. a Lot Width of 174.94' where 100' is required. c. a maximum height of 75'-3" from BFE to top of roof deck where 50' is allowed. d. a front (south) setback of 6.2' to Porte Cochere, where 15' is required. e. a side (west) setback of 5', where 10' is required. f. a rear (north) setback of 0.0' (to seating and pool deck), where 20' is required. g. 93 parking spaces, where 102 spaces are required. h. Density allows 50 units/acre (50 x 0.659) = 32 units allowed for this site, requesting 53 units from density pool. i. Approval of a two year development order. J I .t EXHIBIT "C" WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property to the west is to be redeveloped into a 108 unit "flag" hotel/resort facility. North: The property to the north is the City of Clearwater Marina and Clearwater Harbor. South: The property to the south includes a two story motel, Devon Drive, and a future parking lot. East: The property to the east is Clearwater Harbor. The scale, bulk, density and coverage of the proposed redevelopment are in keeping with the design guidelines found in Beach by Design for the Small Motel District. The proposed mid-rise hotel, of limited services, n ins the existing use of tourist/overnight accommodations, and proposes a 1 roof elevation 76'-9" from the B.F.E. which is well below the 100' maximum allowed. The area to the st of the Tourist District (LMDR) will be redeveloped for storm water detention and landscaping only and will provide a buffer to the residential area to the south. The redevelopment of this property will enhance the area by: • Construction of a new tourist facility in keeping with the City's new design criteria. • Removal of an older property not consistent with today's tourist demands and the City's requirements. • Providing a flag/boutique tourist facility to Clearwater Beach. • Providing a much needed example of what Beach by Design was intended to produce. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed redevelopment maintains the current Tourist District use and is in keeping with the spirit and intent of Beach by Design, as well catering to extended stays and family vacationers. The project greatly reduces the existing on grade parking areas and will provide a much needed landscape buffer between the residential areas to the southeast. This project will provide a positive example of redevelopment and act as a new backdrop for the City's Marina. This project will also provide additional tourists clientele for the restaurants, retail facilities, and the Fishing Fleet. In addition, this redevelopment will keep the existing boat slips as an additional benefit for guests that may bring their own boats as these slips will be available to the guests only. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The redevelopment of this property will maintain the tourist character of the area and will not introduce any new businesses that may adversely affect the health of the neighborhood. The safety of the neighborhood will be enhanced by providing proper sidewalk widths and relocating the driveway to the parking structure away from the corner. The proposed redevelopment will comply with the local, state and federal building codes and guidelines. r 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed redevelopment will provide 85 new tourist rooms with limited accessory amenities so that guests will be encouraged to use the on-site amenities and not generate additional trips. The new project will provide 94 covered parking spaces, including 4 ADA compliant parking spaces. This will provide one space for each room as well as 9 spaces for staff. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal for the City's Marina to the north as well as be in keeping with the recent redevelopment projects to the south. The architectural style is traditional in form and massing and does not reflect any "given" style that may become dated in the future. This redevelopment project will provide a number of additional hotel accommodations but is less intense than those tourist projects to the west and south. This reduction of intensity will provide a buffer to the LMDR to the east as well as provide additional view corridors to the north by removing the existing on-grade parking lot. This project is appropriate to the Beach by Design guidelines, spirit and intent. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual, acoustic and olfactory effects by housing all automobile parking within the new structure. The facade includes enhanced design elements, including many windows, large patio/balconies, vertical and horizontal plane changes and a color palette that is classic and not trendy. The new Sea Captain Resort will act as a visual buffer from the proposed higher structure to the west. The dumpster is to be enclosed in the room indicated for this equipment and rolled out for pick-up at the appointed scheduled time and will be screened from view from the LMDR neighbors to the south. The hours of operation will be 24/7, which is consistent with the surrounding district and the other businesses that cater to the tourist industry. . EXHIBIT "C" WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. Without the transfer of density in the form of additional motel units from the City' pool, redevelopment of this parcel is not feasible due to the lack of economy of scale for a redevelopment of less than 85 total units and accommodating services. By providing all guest and employee parking within the proposed structure, the overall height and "footprint" of the project is increased with a better view and buffer provided to the LMDR neighborhood to the south. This increased height will also buffer noise from the rooftop pool and bar at the proposed property to the west. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. This redevelopment is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan's goals for use, intent and planning objectives of the City's codes and Beach by Design. This redevelopment project is above the minimums required for the Tourist District redevelopment. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. This redevelopment is in keeping with the City's goals and will encourage neighboring properties to redevelop in the same fashion and intent. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. This redevelopment is in keeping with the scale, texture and purpose of the new Tourist District guidelines as well as Beach by Design. With the large landscaped buffet between it and the LMDR district to the south, the neighboring properties will not be substantially impacted. In fact, as a result of the removal of the on grade parking that currently exists, the adjacent properties will be enhanced. The increased height will buffer noise from the rooftop pool and bar at the proposed property to the west and act as a step-down transition for the LMDR district to the south. S. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a flexible development use. The proposed redevelopment from a 27 unit overnight accommodation facility to an 85 room limited service resort is in keeping with the existing tourist use and activities both proposed and existing, and will enhance the overall tourist market variety by offering a "Boutique" hotel experience that caters to the repeat long term guests the property currently enjoys. . .[ . , b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs. By increasing the units from 27 to 85 will substantially add to the tax base, tourist bed tax, and increase employment by 12 to 16 opportunities for employment. c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor. The existing 27 units will be redeveloped to 85 which will greatly increase the economic contribution to the city and county. d. The proposed use provides for the development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; This redevelopment is located in the existing tourist area and is adjacent to a new 108 unit redevelopment project. In addition, this project will act as a buffer toward the single family residential neighborhood to the southeast. e. The proposed use provided for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The existing marina/docks are for the use of the guests and will not be expanded. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district because the redevelopment is consistent with present day tourist criteria. This redevelopment project can be a catalyst toward other similar smaller redevelopment tourist projects. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. This redevelopment complies with the Beach by Design guidelines as to scale, massing, and materials. By providing all guest and employee parking within the proposed structure, the overall height and "footprint" of the project is increased with a better view and buffer provided to the LMDR neighborhood to the south. This increased height will also buffer noise from the rooftop pool and bar at the proposed property to the west. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development support the established or emerging character of an area. By following the guidelines of Beach by Design, this redevelopment project is in keeping with the desired scale, character, and intensity of the existing, and soon to be redeveloped, area. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes: The overall depth of the building is 134'-4" on the west facade and is broken into two masses of 50' and 61' and are separated by the west stair tower that is 13'-4" wide and offset from the westerly face by 5' in accordance with the "Beach by Design" guidelines. The front fagade is 127'-4" wide and is made up of design elements of 62'-8" and 63'-4" wide, which is less than the 100' maximum found in the guidelines. The east facade is composed of several architectural elements; the largest being 58'-4" wide, again, in keeping within the guidelines. The north facade is also composed of several design elements with the largest being the bank of guest room balconies and is a total of 97'-4" wide which is within the guidelines. • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railing, awnings, etc; The design of this project includes several recommended architectural details such as open balconies at the guest rooms; awning elements at smaller windows; freestanding columns at the porte-cochere; open railings at the parking levels; and expressed stair towers on the north, south and east elevations. • Variety in materials, colors and textures: The proposed design incorporates several colors and materials including standing seam metal roofing and awnings; painted cement plaster in panels and banding; stone veneer; and precast architectural elements. While there is suggested a variety of materials and colors, the overall design is in harmony and proportion as outlined in the guidelines. • Distinctive fenestration patterns: All major elevations include guest room balconies with both fixed glass and sliding glass doors recessed from the front facade; smaller windows with standing seam awnings; and large window assemblies reflecting the public use spaces inside. • Building step backs: The upper floors that include the guest rooms set back from the street fagade as do the guestrooms facing to the north and east. • Distinctive roof forms: The use of standing seam, sloping roof elements both on the major roof and the stair towers is repeated in awning elements over smaller windows and balcony openings and at the larger window assemblies at the public spaces on the interior. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. By locating the mass of the structure as far to the north and west as possible, and by not placing parking on the residential zoned property to the east, a landscape buffer will be created between the project and the single family neighborhood to the southeast. The proposed development to the west has the parking levels to approximately 35' above grade and is less than 3', at the closest point to the property line, and then steps back approximately 18' to the east facing guest rooms, thus allowing for views to the south. The redesigned west elevation of this property does not have any windows opening onto the east fagade of the proposed development thus providing privacy to these guest rooms and providing visual relief from a more simple elevation. K A1ACIa _A_RLANE FERGUSGN & MCMUELEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS A7 1_AW 1611 HARDEN BOULEVARD I_A.KF_LAND, FLORIDA 33603 (8631 680-9908 FAX (663) 663-"2649 ONE TAMPA CITY CENTER. SUITE. 2000 201 NOR '1 H FRANKL'.N STREET °.fJ. BOX 1531 (Z$P 33601) TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 (613) 273 4200 FAY. (813, 273-4395 www, m fn d eq al. corn EMAIL.: InfaDrnlmlegalcom May 19, 2010 625 COURT STREET P. O. BOX 1669 (ZIP 337571 CLEARWATE R, FLORIDA 33756 (727)44(-6966 FAX(727)442-647O IN REPLY REFER TO Post Office Box 1669 Clearwater, FL 33757 CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER This is to certify that I, MICHAEL C. FOLEY, an attorney with the law firm of Macfarlane, Ferguson & MCMullen, have examined the public records of Pinellas County, State of Florida, and find the record titleholder to the real property described on attached Exhibit "A", to be vested in DONALD F. I;IFERT and EIFERT PROPERTIES, INC., as the saine is recorded in O.R. Book 5636, page 21 13; public records of Pinellas County, Florida. DATED this / day of May, 2010. MACFARLANE FERGUSON & McMULLEN iviichael C. Foley 63224513 a,. r.•w.,.,r we+..u,awr. 6, I.Sfi.?f? 11?f211.? ?O?O.", S 11 : 3. b?SP..Q 4.1 1 ?tts ii duy 4 Novembar A. 1), f9g3 31oJe this Z1 JOHN S. TAYLOR, III, joined by hie Wife, MARY ANN TAYLOR( $ttuttrn JEAN TAYLOR CARTER, joined by her husband, H. RICHARD CAR?ERj KARY TAYLOR HANCOCK, joined by tier husband, HARRY HANCOCK, of theCounly of Pinellas , In the Stale of Florida port ies of the first pssrl, raid DONALD F. EIFERT and EIFERT PROPERTIES, INC. , ;33 Court Street, Clearwater, florid.", 3.1516 r,I the County of Pinellas in thr Slalr of Florida /"sties of the srrond part. ?Itt11[SSCt11; ThrrJ the said purl Lee of the ilnl lx,rt, fUr and in ronsideratlon of the sum - Dollars, of TEN AND HO/100------------------------ '--'--'------_____ (o them in hued paid by fire suit imi-I ius of the second part, the rerelp( wheae lrerrhy arknoudrdyrd, have granlrrl, 1"irgnlned rind sold III the sold part ies o/ fh Florida situate, tying '. srrond part, their heirs and ussiyns former, the fullawing drarritird (arid. and bring in the Counly of Pinellas State of '- fu-uvlr - I! FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AND - e MADE A PART HEREOF. Xy SUBJECT to any and all onsements, restrictions and reservations of record. SUBJECT to 1983 real estate taxes and subsequent years. y SUBJECT to mortgage deed in favor of Pioneer Federal Sav ngs and Loan Association, dated April 15, 1975, and recorded April 16, 1975 as Instrument 175016638, in O.R. 4279, Page 904, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which thu Grantees, DONALD F. FIFERT and EIFERT PROPERTIL^S, INC., agree to assume and pay. The unpaid principal balance of said moregago being S278,544.57. a ?• Y- 1-d <x 7,.u lsvtns+n.nr Wr imv" B) 3 LARRY A LOAD plKai-AR coVNTYVTIT1.i COMPANY 041 Cwr, 141-1 .-- Cyu.rawr, 3`1a`Ms ¦a . nK.?rr -W.N W eM NUOIff"t a. 4 N au,dllli.u eau WnoC b s {IUe tu.ur.YG. py?uo.aat 1sa+d by M .Ind the said lx+rl lea „f the Peel hurl do herrhy frilly nvrrrnul (he title to said loud. and will defend the same against the luu,ftd "Iuinn of uIl prnufrs whunuurvrr. In AIMS WhfrM, The said that Los of thr first part have hrreuntu set their hnrrd s unJ ter is the duy and ye,rr lint ahi,ve written. tiivwd. irolp4 nnq r, lrr,r; r? n ;j is of u` 111 . [( :` -1 Mary 6hn ?Ay'lor ? f it n $°.iylor C?cto it. Ai?h,+r? Carte[ lire lmrnun,nrlnlamdki arM y Trit1`1(at 1lntkt,rk 1{nrry snrr,r crt t 17 _. 7 ? a Y s h ij b •i y} , J f ..;d 4 t ?n . ,b a. ?. SG36 ere.[ 2111 fUIC Florida ii (erelu ?. P1re13ar1 1{lt ttdif&A, TAw in this du1, hgt.rr m,.. on nffirrr duf) autMvizrd to 8Iv State afur+• 1 seal and in the C,,uM) a/„rr•suid to juke trknut.44pirs.•nis, lava.rrall) aiyirared JOAN S. TAYLOR, iII and MARY ANN TAYLOR, his wlfnt JEAN TAYLOR CARTER and H. RICHARD CARTER, her husband; MARY TAYLOR HANCOCK and HARRY HANCOCJC, her hueban???ribrd in and uhn rtrrrtl rd the /ore#utntt inajrumrnt and t„ nrr kna»rn u, owe tAr /+rr n s they aknuu(rdRrd b../,»r me thoj they rsrl'uted the wn.e. ?j }?!{jtltff rn) hand anrd ufriul sea! in the Cerunt,N and -Slate lard altirrwia this dare/ ?,?,''/)fir(' 1 1. 1/. ?uRl. (7 'a nr, I'uhlir. Id. r.,mu,is.iun rsr:orj ?o i n 7 , ? f =8 GO . r l i l 41., Fenlerr "A" c, SCjG Fu.t2115 bcgin at the SN Corner of Wilter Lot I of CITY PARR IN)Ii,'IS 115V, as rec'oNod nn flat book .13, 1'atie 37, Public Records of Pinellas C-rity, i lotidu, and nun thence Nest along the East and West center line of Scctiun 8, 'township 29 South, ILnge IS Fast, 15 feet to the Easterly line of Uiforwdu Drive, Thence S. 05031'30" W., 116.26 feet to the Northerly line of First Avcnue; thence r S. 84027130" E., 228.00 feet along the Northerly lino of First Avery-so, to the Westerly line of tlamiltun Drive; thence N. 05°32'30" E., 87.59 feet along said Westerly line; thence along a curve to the right, chard hearing N. 500 12'30" E., 21.11 feet, arch equals 23.56 feet and radius Cgtlals ?5 feet; thence S. 84027-30" E„ 27.00 feet; thence N. 05032'30" li„ 39.89 feet to the Fast and West center line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Ru!ge 15 East, and the high water mark in Clearwater lUrthnr; theme Westerly and Northerly along the said high water nark to a point lying S. 04025'11" W., 71.55 feet from the Point of Beginning; thence S. U40.15'11" k., 71.53 feet to the LESS DIE FOLLOW INK; DESCHIBLD THAt'1: Begin at the SW t.arneI- of Hater Iot I of CITY PAID: 51MIVISIOW, as recorder] in Plat book 23, Page 37, P'trblic Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and rim thence West along the last and heat center Iire of Section 8, Township .19 South, Range 15 brat, 1S feet to the Easterly line of Coronado Drive; theme S. 05032'3(-' W., 116,26 feet to the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence S. 84027'30" V., 100,00 Pert along the Northerly line of First Avenue; trience N, 05032, Ili" F.., to the high waiter nark in fleorweter Herhor; therr;e Westerly and Northerly along the said high water wArk to a point lying N. 04025'11" W., 71.53 feet fn:xe the Point of beginning; thence S. 04025'11" E., 71.53 Net to t?nc ALSO: . UJT ONE of RAYSIDE SMIVISIOf, as rocurded in flat lv-_ k 3, l'agv. 18 and 14, Nblic Records of Pinellas Cotmty, Ilurida. AUk) : LUT - O) o f 11AYSIOL S11BU1VI S1UV, a. rccurdol in !'la( Nxik 21, IlaKos 18 :4nd 19, i'ubl it Records of Pinellas Cotunty, i lori la. ALSO : ALL that tract, PICCC or Parrel Of load which adjolns :aid loot Two aril lies Between Wt T).o and the bulkhead line shown nn the map or plat above referred to, paid land being more partliulaily dcscrihcJ as follow": Fk Kghiting at the SE GD-mer of Lot'Two and nut thence Fast 15 feet, ntre or Icss, to the bulk- head line shown on said map or plat; thence North;-!.terly along said tnrlkhead line a distance of 81.35 feet, more or less, to the Intel t-ction of said hulk. head line with the projection of the %rth prulcrty dine of said Vat - o; thence non hest along said projmted Nbrth hourvIary lino to the inter<vitlon of the last property line and snld projection a dd,?tarno if 15 fcct, mnrc m ;e5,; theme .4 n?thrasterly a distance of 81.1S fev!, rl'•te .,r !r>., To the P.O.H. ;?othcn !h all nlurnan ngbt thcrctuul hvl,ngmi ,i nn im),i•e ipp,ilalii mg. ( S • ?i 1 1, i 1 EXHIBIT "A", LUM'IMLrW (. i. 563ti rw2116 All that tract, piece or parcel of land which adjoins Lot Ono (1) of BAYSIM SUBDIVISION, according to the revised map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat . Book 23, Pages 18 and 19, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and which lies between said Lot One (1) and the bulkhead line shown on the map or plat above referred to, said land being morn: particularly described as fol- lows: Beginning at the SE Corner of said Lot C1ne (1), nm thence East 35 feet, more or less, to the bulkhead line shown on said plat; thence Northwesterly along said hulkhead line to the intersection of said bulkhead line with a Northerly projection of the West property 1 in,-- of said Lot Ono (1) ; thence nin South along said Northerly projection of the West property line of said Lot One (1) to the Northerly corner of sold Lot One (1); thence Southeasterly .long the Northeasterly boundary lino of said Lut One (1) a distance of 02.30 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. MGE'MER WITH that portion of liamilton (Munden) T2rivc, Clearwater beach, Florida, vacated by action of the City Coemission of the City of Clearwater as set forth in Resolution No. 67-94, adopted lk•tober 16, 1967, and recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TOGLMiF.R WITH, without covenants of warranty however, any property lying thttween the abaN•c described property and the existing :.ca wdll mKI any riparian rights. PINELL,V COUIV Y TITLE C0. CLEARWATER FLORIDA (ItOLD) STORNI\VATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL CLEARWATER, FL PRESENTED TO: SOUTI IWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CITY OF CLEARWATER FROM: DEUEL & ASSOCIATES 4625 EAST BAY DRIVE, SUITE 211 CLEARWATER, FL 33764 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO: 26320 11 20 BRIAN A. BARKER, P.E. 456728 July 2010 A r t1 SEA CAPTAIN (MOTEL PROJECT NARRATIVE 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed "Sea Captain Motel" is located at 40 Devon Street on Clearwater Beach, IT. The scope of this project will involve the demolition of the existing site improvements (motel and parking lot) and the construction of a new motel and parking lot and stommater management system. The stonmwater management system %yill be constructed to provide 34" of water quality treatment for the entire site. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The. site is currently developed and operating as a motel. There is currently no water quality treatment being prow ided from the runoff of the site before it enters Clearwater l larbor. Clearwater I (arbor is No I desi-nated as an "impaired water body" as confirmed with the FDEP. 3.0 S"I'ORNI\VATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The proposed stonnwwater management system will consist of water quality treatment accomplished by a dry detention pond located at the east side of the property. The pond will treat the first 3/4" of runoff from the entire site. The estimated seasonal high ground wwater elevation was determined to be at El-=2.q which is I' below existing grade. This is shown on the attached geotechnical report performed by Gulf Coast 'T'esting Laboratory, Inc. 4.0 CONCLUSION The stormwater management system for this project has been designed in accordance with the criteria established by the City of Clearwater and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Summary: I scats 15"-inch of runoff • Provides 6" of freeboard ? Erosion control measures will be in state prior to any construction I Mi ? f LICENSED TO: DEUEL & ASSOCIATES STAGE-STORAGE PROJE,^,T NAME SEA CAPTAIN PROJECT NUMBER 2010-63 DESIGNER BB DATE 07/08110 COMMEN SWFWMD /Clearwater AREA @ T.O.B. AREA @ DHW AREA @ DLW AREA @ BOTTOM\NWL 3486 EL.......... .. 4.40 2977 EL.......... .. 3.90 2977 EL.......... .. 3.90 2044 EL.......... .. 2.90 STAGE AREA SQ\FT VOLUME CU\FT STAGE AREA SQ\FT VOLUME CU\FT 2.90 2044 0 3.66 2779 1844 293 2072 61 3.69 2807 1926 2,96 2101 122 3.72 2836 2009 2.99 2129 184 3.75 2864 2093 3.02 2157 247 3.78 2892 2178 3 05 2185 311 3.81 2921 2263 3 08 2214 376 184 2949 2350 3.11 2242 441 3.87 2977 2437 3.14 2270 508 3.90 3005 252,5 3.16 2298 575 3 93 3034 2613 3.19 2327 643 3.96 3062 2703 3.22, 2355 712 199 3090 2794 3 25 2383 781 4.6 3118 2885 3.28 2412 852 4.05 3147 2977 3 31 2440 923 4.08 3175 3070 3.34 2468 995 4.11 3203 3164 3.37 2496 1068 4.14 3232 3258 3.40 2525 1142 4-16 3260 3354 3.13 2553 1217 419 3288 3450 3.46 2581 1292 4.22 3316 3547 3.49 2609 1369 4.25 3345 36,15 352 2638 1446 4.28 3373 3744 3 55 2666 1524 4.31 3401 3844 3 58 2694 1603 4.34 3429 39,14 3 61 2723 1682 4.37 3458 4045 3-6-1 2751 1763 4 40 3486 41,17 VOLUME ABOVE TREATMENT 0 CF SWFWN, D TREATMENT VOLUME 2525 CF_ _ TOTAL VOLUME 2525 C;F ?? ?' rLE l c? !! l% ; l ?d 17 >i f i/ Y L ` `? ti ? 5 f l i? +mwoccsam®n s:7san,.rr Constant Filter Area Site Data Project area = 0.83 Acres A = 3 90 ft - Elevation of the to of t li Rainfall runoff depth = 0.75 Inches (OFW ?) B = . 2.90 . p wa er qua ty treatment volume ft. - Elevation of the bottom of the treatment v l th d Required treatment volume = 2.260 Cubic Feet C = 2 00 o ume or e pon ft - Underdrain invert elevation Underdrain pipe length = 30.0 Feet . 0 65 . ft - distance from bottom (B) t th t li f h Underdrain pipe diameter = 6 Inches H = . 1 50 . o e cen er ne o t e underdrain ft - trench hei ht Manning's n = 0.010 . 5 42 . g Darcy's k (fUhr) Total bleeddown time = 18.52 Hours Area of pond at elevation A = . 2 977 square feet Pond Volume okay? Yes Area of pond at elevation B = , 2 044 square feet Recovery time okay? Yes Average pond surface area A = , 2 511 square feet Underdrain pipe size okay? Yes R Filter Flow Length = . 2 00 feet Underdrain invert elevation okay? Yes . FILTER FILTER AVG. WATER TOT. INCR. DER !NCR. FLOW HYD. AREA FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL ELEV. HEAD - ' HEAD VOL. (V) I VOL. LENGTH GRAD. A= L x Q=KiA (Q1+Q2)i2 71ME TIME (FT.) (F 11 .) (FT.) (CU.FT.) (CU.FT.) (FT.) i=h/lav H or W ( CFH) ( CFH) (HRS) (HRS) 3.90 1.65 2,496 2.00 0.8250 45 201 0.17 477 191 2.50 2 50 3.73 1.48 2,C19 2.00 0.7417 45 181 . 0.17 453 171 2.65 15 5 3.57 1.32 1,565 2.00 0.6583 45 161 . 0.17 429 150 2.85 8 00 3.40 1.15 1,137 2.00 0.5750 45 140 . 0.17 - 404 130 3.11 11 11 3.23 0.98 733 2.00 0.4917 45 120 . 0.17 379 110 3.45 14 56 3.07 0.82 354 2.00 0.4083 45 100 . 0.17 354 89 3.95 18 52 2.90 0.65 0 2.00 0.3250 45 79 . GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONS I ItUCTION NIATEIRIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CAI?T;f7ACTF_ gfAU77;0R1ZATI0N rI00002370 PHONE: (727) 544-4080 F,,L\': (727) 544-7532 , ?W vSING _ DOItB 1rL TETR :. ?., CLIENT: Deuel 3 Associates LAB NO: 16968 PROJECT: Sea Captain, 40 Devon, Drive, Clearwater Beach, Florida DATE REPORTED: 6!8!10 DATL' TESTED: 6/71'10 LOCATION OF TEST: 35' N x 18' W of SE Corner of Property (see Site Plan and Pictures) DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 3' 2" Below the Existing Ground Surface ? ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: I' +/- Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: Tidal variations iu the harbor wili influence the Water Table. WATER "I"EMP: N/A WATER pH: N/A Y= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE I o,o i I Q.0 S.5 N.o 7.5 7.0 (,.5 r,.0 ?I 5.5 5.0 I N C I I I'I:R HOUR 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elapsed "Dime (Flours) INFILTRATION IZATE = 5.9 INCHES/ HR. Respectfully SUhhliUC'd. I<. C,unasekatttn, P.i:. la_ License No. '0402 CC: IkUd S Associates 3 File I Ground level t.` TEST Depth 1 -5" below Extstln V,?ade t T, ------------ ---- Test Elevation Depth CLASSIFICATION to feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPRQC ELEV ) Dark Brown Sand NO Roots Q''3" (Planter), 10 ry 3/3 Brown Sand w/ Occ. Roots &, Fcw 0' 9' Shell Fragments, I0l r 4/3 Light Brown Sand ? / Shell Fragments, 7.5yr 6/4 1;10" Brown Sand w/ Occ. Roots 7.5yr 4/2 ' . P k Dark Brown Sand w/ 3 11".',, Slight Trace of Silt, 7.5yr 4/2 Light Gray Sand w/ Shell Fragments, 10yr 7/1 - . Gray Sand NO Trace of Fine - `4= 8" ; Shell Fragments, 10yr 6/1 Gray Sand w/ Shell Fragments Pieces oCSilt, 10•;r 5/] Hole Terminated at 66" 24" Outer ring r phis report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without written permission of the Client or GCTL. s '. -? -, ?'? '- -- J -- -- -- -F?i <?;-= •? EAST-WEST G OF SECTION B-29-15 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 51 11 _ ??? r zy' S 47'07'53' E 12.96. r _ r /,--PUMa HO. SE o, \\ 'F=5 t, -F-195.;0' F- es WATER LOT -A- 3 W }?\_- r?._%? \ \ LOT 1 / \\\ / \\ r (PER PLAT) J of ?- \ G / ??- \? (35') a \rn ASG-T SSa c - I?? TOP Lco NV 1 ?' \ A BOUNDAR . 0.3 The following I I ,v ??? -BULKHEAD LINE 3.1' r sIJ I AN°p O ?\\ \ ,\\\ \\ r( lEFR P1L-1 _ t10mdary huu I Y I Lots I and 2, ,tea 3m- ?./y or z a?\ ?^ ??j ?' a z-sro?v ??% l s o ) > /? \ \ a, `, ID C'`.I Test j i9, Public Rx ( S UI GIhG !et' r7 7-0f-way v r:5JO - l I? F 4f ?io+'- ?Locca,IOn 1 AND ?I .z u_e re`s 14 7 ` npLttcd 6nC s \ '-? ?STORY , s..° ? I I ? R vt \ 3• N- ? \ G /? ('?• \?, ? ?----- Dcacnbod as 6 .. ?,' .{tj p S Q' r FN1 \ i 14 / 3.80 \ Fin of the S (\- 1 eu LcINC L k I ^C dzsl z C FF=5.00 7 I I ,` Z'". \ +' ?cAr? 1 - a ee t J., s!e• evv ? ? (e 2:3. Page 37, Y, asn ??I ?J b I - p r am? \ / \ cenwrline of S -l U',CA"E7 1 ?c - Anrws 33.2 NOT FDUND Ea Avenw; medy line ,- .R gsd ORINO WS ?`?71 I i In ?C•?, 4?5 ``1 /I 9• • 1.60 L, l \1 B?•lPmmUlS- 5 (104') __\ •? i? ?7.' I 5 ?2 EJ? i N 8 3;iw A•:=r+Ai1 II ,o- 77'3C5' > 3.5° 3- E ._ Tp R1 I E. FIR (Y,-) 2T04 \ Theme N.OS" w °• /,? r'v[a r. ?Ir ?5 g4 i X2572 BdZT30' W f0a.63' " ?q ?5An. C.,. ?` v'l?-^r ?i rye `7 i28.e4' (u) ?I 104.zr (Rj FM&D ?'' n'bmrnR°d l°' --i.? r u 28 . \ `vct, tha ? 100' (R) FN &D i I I 2 78.40 3634'54", arc G. LOT 3 foot; thonco f'4 fit. churl of? to the right hay Jss- uz 0" 2 , e] hearing S26'0 wv. -0.32 : S] x _? 4? ?GJ L 3.Oi J-.s ?vJi WSWAIL non u uv. oc r- 45 I I i distance 1672 GO ?3 12' k^.J e'1-aL- 1 I InYGaHeelrOa A'1 121 Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, Inc. iNV. -u.e5 ' 5r a??NL ??"? Lab #16968 6/7/10 - '`_ - PLti7j ;FCM Sea Captain T 40 Devon Drive W a ° tim Clearwater Beach, Florida FIR LDRI Test Location ?, z ? E t «r ?5 4k5 Gulf Coast Testing ! -aboratory, inc. Lab #16968 6/7/10 Sea Captain 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Beach Florida - , Site View k' - c 4 ? TM1?C , i q k- .?G^' rt'v? F, ?' .? .Tw T ;.r F Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, Inc. Lab #16968 6/7/10 Sea Captain 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida DRI Test Location U DRI Location r , PARKING REDUCTION STUDY FOR SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL PRESENTED TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER PREPARED BY: DEUEL & ASSOCIATES 4625 EAST BAY DRIVE, SUITE 211 CLEARWATER, FL 33764 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO: 26320 r .s No. 56728 Vigo BRIAN A. BARKER; P.E. #56728 November 2010 INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to redevelop their property located at 40 Devon Drive on Clearwater Beach into an 85-room motel. The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the parking characteristics of the redevelopment. The City of Clearwater has requested a detailed analysis estimating the number of parking spaces actually needed to service the various functions of the proposed motel once it is redeveloped. Based on the City of Clearwater Code requirements, on-site parking should include 1.2 spaces per unit and therefore the requirement is 102 parking spaces for the 85 room motel. A reduction to the number of required parking spaces is being requested. This analysis was prepared to demonstrate the actual parking demand for the proposed development and to justify the request for reduction. PARKING SUPPLY After redevelopment, the site will contain 93 parking spaces, which is equivalent to one parking space per unit plus 8 additional parking spaces. The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach and allows for off-site parking. There are four (4) public parking lots within 1,000 feet of this site that can be utilized for off-site parking. PARKING DEMAND During normal occupancy periods 70% of the hotel rooms are expected to be occupied, which translates to 60 rooms. During rare full occupancy, all 85 rooms would be used. Based on existing travel patterns, approximately 50% of the hotel guests would require a parking space for a rental car, whereas the remaining 50% would arrive by other modes of travel such as taxicab, limousine service or airport shuttle. The proposed development has a meeting room with a capacity of 60 seats. It is assumed that 80% of the attendees will be staying at the hotel. The remaining 20% will be arriving by car, assuming 2 persons per car, which translates to 6 parking spaces. The proposed development has a banquet room with a capacity of 81 seats. It is assumed that 80% of the attendees will be staying at the hotel. The remaining 20% will be arriving by car, assuming 2 persons per car, which translates to 8 parking spaces. The employees of the proposed development will consist of an estimated maximum of 7 employees for the largest shift. It is assumed that 40% of the employees arrive and keep their vehicle at the proposed site, which translates to 3 parking spaces. The proposed development does not include a restaurant. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT The City of Clearwater has requested a detailed analysis estimating the number of parking spaces actually needed to service the proposed redevelopment based on specific operations. COMPARISON OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND A comparison was made to determine whether the calculated parking demand can be reasonably met with the proposed number of spaces to be provided on-site. During periods of full occupancy, the 64 space demand represents 69% of the proposed parking supply of 93 code-compliant spaces. As such, adequate parking will be provided for the hotel operations. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff as utilized and approved with similar sites on Clearwater Beach. This analysis demonstrates hotel operations can easily be accommodated with the proposed 93 on-site parking spaces. TABLE 1 - SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL - PARKING DEMAND CALCULATIONS NORMAL OCCUPANCY (70%) FULL OCCUPANCY + MEETINGS SPACES REQUIRED SPACES REQUIRED FUNCTION VARIABLE NUMBER PERSONS/ROOM SPACES NUMBER PERSONS/ROOM SPACES HOTEL STAFF (SHIFT A 7AM-3:30PM) EMPLOYEES 7 40% USE CAR 3 7 40% USE CAR 3 HOTEL STAFF (SHIFT B 3PM-11:30PM) EMPLOYEES 7 40% USE CAR 3 7 40% USE CAR 3 HOTEL STAFF (SHIFT C 11PM-7:30AM) EMPLOYEES 3 40% USE CAR 2 3 40% USE CAR 1 HOTEL GUESTS (85 ROOMS) ROOMS 60 50% USE CAR 30 85 50% USE CAR 43 MEETING ATTENDEES (HOTEL GUEST) PERSONS N/A N/A 0 48 N/A 0 MEETING ATTENDEES (NON-GUEST) PERSONS N/A N/A 0 12 2 PERSONS/CAR 6 BANQUET ROOM (HOTEL GUEST) PERSONS N/A N/A 0 65 N/A 0 1 BANQUET ROOM (NON-GUEST) PERSONS N/A N/A 0 16 2 PERSONS/CAR 8 38 ASSUMPTIONS: NORMAL OCCUPANCY IS 70% WITH 50% HOTEL GUESTS USING CAR (OTHER 50% ARRIVE BY SHUTTLE, TAXI, LIMO) EMPLOYEE PARKING IS LIMITED TO 40% OF EMPLOYEES USING A CAR BASED ON EXISTING DATA MEETING ROOM CAPACITY IS 60 SEATS, 80% ASSUMED STAYING AT THE HOTEL, 20% ARRIVE BY CAR (2 PERSONS PER CAR) = 6 BANQUET ROOM CAPACITY IS 81 SEATS, 80% ASSUMED STAYING AT THE HOTEL, 20% ARRIVE BY CAR (2 PERSONS PER CAR) = 8 FITNESS ROOM CAPACITY IS 25 PERSONS, 100% ASSUMED STAYING AT THE HOTEL EMPLOYEE REQUREMENTS BASED ON SEA CAPTAIN PROJECTIONS. 64 1EGENO PROPOSED LECENO ?? w a "w .nw-m URVE LENGM RApVB pNEC`l' ON C... ? r as ONE' L ` RE -C .1C CO /f NF i _ ?N J L ? w o -- ---- r- ? ???, I I re I ..„ [11RE EC I ® .« N- n sw-OLENHO LE T I Og R.H ww mm I I I I J -yy OO?ILTMM?1? ?r_- ----___ I __ I -- I I I c f I Kr ? P 9 A W - - .vcOSA Irro., ? .os o I I I I Ia .Or,R?9.2a~ff ?wrE?OO ? PaR ??t O . N. R V V {? 1A101{.Ww P worun laN[,?(R ral ?rt?o0-.vB rLOae u.[ (? ?` fF< rzl ?a« I I r ?`- um as ' } +a? V iqF ? t?A vE*.oa«R N.,?mE.?NO.. 1 tuw?oh aza ar%."s i:`ia ,I o ?4'r?it R« »o NN FIJI— LAN. JOE MO io: 8716)2' NAVE CLEARWAIFR BEACH, GULF OF MEXICO NEON NCH ER .1CH VMlER (NHHW) 0.9.8 Ei (NAVp ,988) HN;N «AiER (111) - 0607 EL (NANO E.) IF I8 b SEA C,9PT,9/N RESORT SITE PLAN N -800-.32-.]]0 IEGENC v°SEo IEGENU ww -Won '? [Mmwu FERTILIZATION NOTES SHRUBS AND TREES Cl- I ---__ GROUNOCONER AREAS¢ ? .oe TABLE ?I ?® r r -`-\\? ? one¢««o«?¢er.,r«r.«e««¢¢o.«.. «¢.. rx.e I r qs unss I q]:. t 7. °^d ¢ 2DNER. t l ;7E' ei USE LAND N / xwuroN rcx- I srNBaL LEGEND I Fl- I l? ? ELE R E CLUN-our ® s.Nl- 0 SA.- E sE Rrn Ll, 1' 11.1 -sEE .Raln ®w ? r ' „P ro-em 1 5 _ CG .xxo.a ?wzcxEl sass iAi orp j J »o? p .L (s¢ ] a z• sxa i DRrK ° o N (s (IST A " KNLE A T) GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES Y D'S THE -- 1-8-432 477D N o w ,o sc® d y? IRRIGATION NOTES v171P r . coxvo.ee^qe ^ eq _J 1 --..u..w ]. ¢B geEm eauomntea e^ a y?p?erra oKreq q«e r.a v¢cn, P.gMr Nqq 5. TI, q 5/F ms.«uew®r 2. ine w.eimle oGv w B. iNe to arp Is .ul ee ¢tnize pe eocn SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL m _ o-,rr¢I i,mer q Emn[er L'^' PLANT SPACING DETAIL ca (NO-OFFSET) "O eiasrv; PALM PLANTING DETAIL SZ'A C4PT,91,V RZSO1 ZAiVOSCAPZ' PLAN 00 DII 60" -- - ?IAf?I n! 1F4t.1CN D" - MAA1 A -- AMLIL I 10 e D $$ i calm DO MI .r" NM?N Dltlv? OWILTM DNA - P LA i? (P b I cn °- 51te Ian t Data Calculations o °" mw ?n "° o ? . o Aff 1 Z70W Emu 9FF ? . `°'° ? .L r -Add lawn MM ? ? CM Y 3 De{d•d i'V?eMa 8ff ? ? ?, 4 Cmarab WD. d CMI PIdr 8FF r •_. ? ? 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Florida 33156 ? ? ? ? - ? ? t€ tt ? I i ? i I I I ? I IL Igo Mir ONE FOWLER ASSOCIATES ®¦ ARCIIL1 ECTS, INC. ® !iA at 01f R r 7 4- 4W W-0 30a 6'd a d i'-0 W.W WO )F-r I 2 3 4 scea'resa Fim Plan: 2nd Floc 36 SPACES b S'b' 8 16'd W-4' pa W-V § roo? oFr d da?eebdai? r E _ . ? yw? 8 ? 94N M1 ± ' T ? + ? • u Kira „ ? ? d6?8" I 4' " 1 -0 zr w er-0 a' Floor Plan: 5th door n Unite PIM! FLMM 44-V iv I 2 3 ? 5 6 floor Plan: 3rd Floor r.rr or 38 SPADES .. Ftrw NOWN -r II ' T? l F y 10 a § . 1264' m -26'-4" _ I F _ 23 8" r A ?'?' 30a da Ifa 7- ffi'd Y'-0 br-0 ers oe'a 11 unite, PNW FLCM 84.0' 0 FLm No= 0 PLAN HOPUM TO?7' ,qF PLM Floor Plan: 4th Floor n unite. FHM FLOM a"- Roof Plan a P-101 W01l1H Floor Plan: Stn Floor M unite. NNW PL XM .a.e? ?--1 ->4 F---open---> vs, , v-V 6 P-7- ,w PANEL FOR MURAL "ART IN 4l.IC PLACES' _ 11NROOR TANDI% SEAM METAL ROOF COLO M R TD ATCH: SNERIUIN-WILLIAMS'1T28 uSPROUTu CEMENT PLASTE PAINTED , . COLOR TO MATCK : SNERWIN-WILLIAMS 16091 uLIGWMIGW BEIGE" 4M COLOR, TTD MATER PAINTED. ' AMS 1605? uBANK _ COORToMCµ SNERWIN-WILLIAMS'1100 __ - _- uARCADE WHITE" APPLIED FIELD STONE: "BOSTON BLEND" f P Q?rn C7 ? N 9 bmw.. mow ? Exterior Elevations ? DAR ma ? PAN W. KV" MY ? 'P•' •••.• .,...... ^ ,•~•• ••_••"„ ?? . ? ? ? ro A? ? ? ¦NO FOWLER ASSOCIATES W 4.21 o ?? ? No ARCHITECTS, INC. k ? 40 Devon Drive Cl Fl t id 33156 ? ? ? '?`T9V F' 'M?A? `°°'' ?C°'?"?" "'u" ? earwa er, or a ? ? `V 4IIli II iif lll!I ill i:l it it u i111'i! Ij!I. : ill:: III Ij I :':•!'i l: "ii ? III I ?! ijl?li'i! I j j li I I if jil!I'i I. I ! I ! IIIIIIi I r!?Ijllr; I iijj?Ijl! ? : II I n yl !li:!i I :!!? ij I'llll9l Ili?l! !Ili '' II!I !II jj? i!j I! I j!I I p?.III! Hill i ", I! w '•!I !Ili 1"•I!? !!I! L I':.I tl Ipjl. I ti!I lip .. C-+. 101i iiiillj I:il I i :;:::::•li!:!1! Iin ! ? III,! I!!ill!?? 'ill!!i!!i!!Ili iii :I!IIlj i :' I ? y Il!j O II!!!iEili: lii !jl!II;i ?'!I?IIII I: Il?i?l.!:n Iii II'l?l: ?Y .!!!!II': II''!I!i:il!III il! ;•'{111:` I I il!!I IIIi•;: .' •IIII !?::i;•:j:i ii :ii::li! jIi!IIII! !fj!Ij y ''!! y !!: ai1!I!i ri: i;il! pq.iji i!il !! Ili ii!!!i1;1 j!!!ifi! ? i! !!! !i!? Illi ::: I !!'fhGii !f! !!!j! l! !i IMI! i !!iil:ill I:!I!'ili a : 1. . . • 'i ?i?::; 11ii 1. !f f !iil;lli!'1ii l!jii1 !5f!i!I!5! Gi1n!il!iiiiil: 0;IIi1I!iiiit1 1 ! ij ?!itiiif i1nn111! I!I:i; g. I I II " 82'-0 -A (? O ctT ? U32 ?p-n EOM ?EO? E_O? EO? Eli= 3 3t?'i Ell r-i! m o fig =-tt t v -04 ae>z ?a. r?aar ra exterior elevati °"R ??1?.? ?a aole 11" R mm W100e64g ?' ons. o ? ? ? ? o "gym b MMNTQWCW '°'°°'°' ro°""'a°°'? ? ? ? ¦no FOWLER ASSOCIATES ? ?? 3e.!? ? ?? ARCHITECTS INC N ? 40 Devon Drive Clearwater, Florida 33156 EMMMMWENMN? ? El ? [Ell , . ? ¦ ;a C lttAA TI A 61 X61!: R 1! ` 1Nl7eQl ¦ El y• Exter or Elevations. N ? ? pt n -h. ? 40 Devon Drive Cl ? earwater, Florida 33156 `S Y mz I n ?svuuoerwtt? EDMYLATM ro mmmropw w ? ¦NO FOWUR ASSOCIATES w ? ¦¦ ARCHITECTS, INC. ? ¦ 61AfjMITEC?,f? ?LA(Ri71tl TIf?I y 84 --PANEL FOR MURAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES" ---5TANDINGG SEAM METAL ROOF '1128 "SPROUT" PAINTED. %092 E PAINTED. '6052 Y MISS FOWLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. YT GARf 611H'.61E D?tlEMY 0.3iLM fDiM/9]OlI?F.f41Wi5)39 ¦ 5idCfI ATE 6iE a"M ER ZAZAT04 W 1N - °°TE IFTI Exterior Elevations " -- Sea Captian Drt c 4 c--, cV 1! 40 Devon Drive 33156 Fl id l • , or a earmate C 11100 3- 6F {fib +? -o Y -Top OF PARAPET m STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF COLOR 70 MATCH: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS'T128 "SPROUT" 4--CEMENT PLASTE,? PAINTED. COLOR TO MATCH: 5HERWIN-WILLIAM5'6092 "LIGHTWEIGHT BEIGE" _ m CEMENT PLASTE? PAINTED. COLOR 70 MATC LIAMS'6052 S m . DBANK ' PRECAST M. ATCH: ' • COLOR TOM e ?SHER IN-WILLIAM5 F1100 alp ARCADE WHITE" -?` APPLIED FIELD STONE: ?"B05TON BLEND" m ?Qa E a e- t E I I O SCALE: 333' . V-0• 51E}5B1 R KLLfR ppYO.?N fDPi%1lIfQ62lSOf.Yfrl digllEL15.1C.%. Eq I r - - o - °"T' ' iEl Exterior Elevation5_ FOWLER ASSOCIATES Ci1 C ? U U j' ; Gaptidn >Drt kL Sp . 1! ARCHITECTS, IN I ¦ ??5m.?:?« 'T .? ??.?... ?U' J] L ??-1 40 Devon Dire Clearwater, Florida 3;156 I d ?l m r MOM FOWLER ASSOCIATES f 1 IL J ARCHITECTS, INC. I ¦ wi camsere.n.a[?we n3nN mwsxa?.crmwns33s raiE of rLam..s.?++EC'?wY ?ceeE ruaieaa:-cov a.i CEMFGnE 6 cc?ewaiE MRHOPoZariP+rLEER.fSOWVS I I ' _ . L I 71 Exterior Elevations. II=1j ? env vPa Captian o I t L J1 I C--4 J 40 Devon Drive n (3-) d Clearwater, Florida 33156 VW 4:. .. , w 7 t ? ? t° 1/ c? t l 0 SiEA@1R fCRfR WOESAY ?CG9rW1111gIHf .1!lOpolp MOlIBIA IL lA i MEN FOWLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. L El 0 0 Y ?* CC 5? 331" • V-0" SF DRIOI WE Exterior Elevations- IEJ 0 PFGIEGi N) C-14 bFEi 1D J) Sea Captian art 40 Devon Drive Clearwater, Florida 331156 c m d SEAM METAL ROOF MATCH: ILLIAM6 01128 "SPROUT" LASTED PAINTED. IILLIAM5 %092 iHT BEIGE" LMATC? PAINTED. IILLIAMS %052 K TRIM. ) MATCH: 1ILLIAM5 '1100 WHITE" FIELD STONE: BLEND" r° FLOOR PLAN UNIT "A"?E:I/1.I'•0' FLOOR PLAN UNIT "BII9CALE:VI'.I'.0' FLOOR PLAN UNIT "G"EE t/,, ,_V 691 or. 512 SF. 640 5F. FLOOR PLAN UNIT" IIDII 4 IIEII SCALE: WIT D . 627 SF. WIT E • 601 OF. FLOOR PLAN UNIT IIFII SCALE, V4•.I'566 P. H r BAT rT om j l T O v BEDRDOM *z j LI yINCs/DI f?N. Y 7d f 0 )'-? T M-f r-f rt r-f rd v? Ll = ' ___J i AT IJT. °m 1 i 7 T- ? ? 60'%50•. ___ I T ? ? - , r - - e ti Tit ?? fr _ I LI = I yNG/DIRIRC, RM. 1 rd frd r-r I , 43 ? U6 ? p i rLUVI'< I`'LAN UNI 1 SCALE 114•4-0• 546 SF. FLOOR PLAN UNIT "N" 555 SF. SCALE: t/4'•I'-0' I#: 2010285832 BK: 17054 PG: 1257, 10/11/2010 at 08:11 AM, RECORDING 5 PAGES $44.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS BOUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMOS l/ PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: HARRY S. CLINE, Esquire Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Post Office Box 1669 Clearwater, FL 33757 FEE SIMPLE DEED THIS INDENTURE, effective this 4' day of November, „ 'r 1983 ?? - between EXPERT PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida dissolved corporation, and DONALD F. EXPERT, Individually, of the County of Pinellas, and State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose% % mailing 'addi ass \ is: 40 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767,:Aud .EN',dAPTPIN, a Florida general partnership, of the Couru?jc ofi Pinell.ae) and State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, w#ose maiiing address is: 40 ,1 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767; W,,I,tNEE?\sETH: WHEREAS, the herein y'e identified Party of the First Part, on the 4th day of,November.,`1983?, did execute a deed to transfer the properties oe,attAched 4khibit "A° to Party of the Second Part named hgrein,`artd',the Party of the Second Part has from that date owned `,ard `,,dperated the said properties described on attached lGhibit and '?4HERIAS, the original deed duly executed on said date was fcr reasons unknown not recorded in the public records in and Eor Pinellas County, Florida, and the parties hereto desire to correct said omission, and to finalize the transaction on the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, said deed being executed by DONALD F. EIFERT, Individually, and as the sole stockholder, PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17054 PG 1258 director and pessident of the said corporate Party of the First Part, incident to winding up its affairs; it is NOW, THEREFORE, that the said Party of the First Part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), to them in hand ?r paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bar- gained, sold and transferred, and by these presents does grant, rl `` bargain, sell and transfer a fee simple interest in the hereinafter described property unto the said Party of the Second Part all that,' certain parcel of land lying and being in the County of Pinellas4'%, ; and State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: % See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated kiesein by reference. THIS DEED IS GIVEN TO WIND UP AND LIQUIDATE: THE\\VFjIRS,OF THE CORPORATION. Subject to current real estate,'-t'axes,, trictions, reservations and easements of recarg. Parcel I.D. Number: OS ?? I jc t1,odQ0 ,3?o;.Q3G0 Together with all the tePfaments,,tiereditaments and appur- tenances, with every priviegea r,'ght, titje, interest and estate, dower and right of dower,;,teversian,,remainder and easement thereto 6' ',ining. belonging or in anywise'a' pp e TO HAVE AND T' N0LD-1the`game in fee simple forever. % r ` : IN WITNESS ,IAHEREOF,`r?he said Party of the First Part has hereunto set.her%,hand andi$eal the day and year above written. EIFERT PROPERTIES, INC., a In the' ?`$re`se'r{ce of: Florida corporation By: ?4 0'l (41P-1 (SEAL) Prink ` ame 'Linda S. Morrie Donald F. Eife C"&q h «? 11 J Print Name Kathleen A. O'Hearn P Innt N me Linda S. Morris Print Name Kathleen A. O'Hearn zzl-&, (04-di (SEAL) DO 'RATD F. EIFERT -2- PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17054 PG 1259 „ „ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before ?` % me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take ?I % %+ acknowledgments, DONALD F. EIFERT, Individually and as President of EIFERT PROPERTIES, INC., to me personally known or who has produced,---- identification and who did take an oath,,, as and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before me that he exe`c-%\ j' cuted the same for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal at Clearwater,,daid County and State, this day of October, 2010. `?`? ,? Notary PuBlir Print Ntme_ 'KA1i .een \A. 0' Hearn My Cgajmis-dion `Exgi`.gcs ? ; . ` ? ?of AN e oiary uf,Gc State of 'Onda ? Kathleen A (Maam i , ` ? ` _ My Comismin DD674739 7o, HO Ez ues07/20/701+ , hAhsc\docs4 ifen.fsd.doc -3- PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17054 PG 1260 EXHIBIT "A" Begin at the SW Corner of Water Lot 1 of CITY PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and run thence West along the East and West center line of Section 8, Township ; 29 South, Range 15 East, 15 feet to the Easterly line of Coronado Drive, 'thence S. O5°32'30" W., 116.26 feet to the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence S. 84°27'30" E., 228.00 feet along the Northerly line of First Avenue, to the , Westerly -line of Hamilton Drive; thence N. 05°32'30" E., 87.59 feet along said Westerly line; thence along a curve to the right, chord bearing N. 50° -- 32'30" E., 21.21 feet, arch equals 23.56 feet and radius equals 15 feet; thence ?•??> S. 84°27'30" E., 27.00 feet; thence N. OS°32'30" E., 39.89 feet to the East % and West center line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 1S East, and the '.;% high water mark in Clearwater Harbor; thence Westerly and Northerly along thp,' '? - - said high water mark to a point lying N. 04°25'11" W., 71.53 feet from the % Ibint of Wginning; thent a S. 04°25'11" P., 71.53 feet to the 11.0.11.0 LESS 111E MLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: Begin at the SW Corner of Water Lot 1 of - " CITY PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, thiblitRecords of Pinellas CAxinty, Florida, and run thence West along the last atur4k,'%t center line of Section 8, Township 29 South,'Range 15 Fnst;%FS feet to` Easterly line of Coronado Drive; thence S. 05°32130" W, lle, 4 ,feet ,-a the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence S. 84°27'30" E.% ; 1'Q0.00Jeet along the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence N. 05°32;311'x-1::, to. the\h0gh water mark % in Clearwater Flarbor; thence Westerly and Northerly along,tlie,3aid high water mark to a point lying N. 04025111" W., 71.53 17?0t from the', Point of Beginning; theiwe S. 044)-75#1109 1,..p 7133 feet to th4 K( )i: ALSO: LOT ONE of BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION, ap'VJA 4ed in Piat Book 23, Pages l8 and 19, Public Records of Pinellas Cgt*ty, FldriBa. ALSO: ' LO'f TWO of BAYSIDE SUB61ViS20"t,\a,Vrecorded in Plat Book 23,. Pages 18 and 19, Public Records of P gellas County\,'Aorida. ALSO: AIA. tiwt Itragt, `p?ecb,or parcel of land which adjoins said Lot 1100 and lies between,Ldt 4100-and the, bulkhead line shown on the map or plat above referred to, saitl'1and?6ing more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the S6 Comer 1W1r?Lor.AOO and run thence Fast 15 feet, More or less, to the bulk- heaa,line sHo10n on said map or plat; thence Northwesterly along said bulkhead line,q disfxice of 81.35 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said bulk- head line with the projection of the North property line of said Lot Two; thence run West along said projected North boundary line to the intersection of the East property line and said projection a distance of 35 feet, more or less; thence Southeasterly a distance of 81.35 feet, more or less, to the P.O.B. Together with all riparian rights thereunto belonging or in anywise appertain- ing. -1- PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17054 PG 1261 L,/ E (HIBIT 'W', CONTINUED All that tract, piece or parcel of land which adjoins Lot One (1) of BAYSIDE SUBMISIM, according to the revised map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book .23, Pages 18 and 19, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and which lies between said Lot One (1) and the bulkhead line shown on the map or plat above referred to, said land being-more particularly described as fol- lows: Beginning at the SE Corner of said Lot One (1), run thence East 35 feet, more or less, to the bulkhead line shown on said plat; thence Northwesterly I. II .I " along said bulkhead line to the intersection of said bulkhead line with a Northerly projection of the West property line of said Lot One (1) ; thence rLv, - South along said Northerly projection of the West property line of said Lot,' One (1) to the Northerly corner of said Lot One (1); thence Southeasterly altlhg ; tlw Northeasterly boundary line of said lot One (1) a distnnce of 62.30 feet,` more or less, to the Point of Beginning. , TOGETHER WTlli that portion of Hamilton (Hamden) Drive, Clearwater Uhch, Florida, vacated by action of the City Commission of the Cd - bf,Clearw?'r as set forth in Resolution No. 67-94, adopted October,16, 14`7,,e±nd x-'orded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TOGEIM WITH, without covenants of warranty hpl,glsvBr, any`prgpkvIty lying between the above described property and the 4xlisting se?ee? wail and any riparian rights. `, Said property also being furthrt d'escOo with,the following description, the same having been established by (hahcdrilin deed of conveyance from the City of % Clearwater to SEA CAPT,AFN,-a, off" general partnership, dated January 26, 2004, recorded in O.g. Sook'13357,',P e g1490, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, to-wits i 1Hf FOLLON!/:C !S A OESU%P_T[pN qR )ly! ;4PUN05 L ttV0 B£7K£fN 7Hf £XlS7" SEAWALL AND 'WE DEED OfSA?/9ED B0UND.4RY [INf.S BEGIN AT THE SW CORNET{ OF WAil:ft -LOT-) %OF CITY PARK SUBDIVISION; AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 23, PAGE 37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS ,COUNTY, F'LORlb&-AND. (HUN THENCE WEST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. f ANGE 11'A,? EAST, 15 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF CORONADO DRIVE; THENCE S.0572'30'WO18.26 FEET 4J TO THE NORTHERLY LINE C)MIRST AMUE; THENCE S.84'27'3D'E., 100.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF FIRST AVENUE- AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PLAND DESCRIPTION; THENCE N-00-tZ30-W., 176.4 PEST TO A POINT ON THE SEAWALL SAID POINT ALSO BONG POINT 'A' FOR THE SUBMERGED LAND DESCRIPTION; THENCE RUNF6NG`VM THE WWALL THE FOLLOWING COURSE'S.' S.634r47-E,76.40 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF t59.25 FELT, A DELTA OF 3674'54, ARC OF 101.66 FEET, A CHORD OF 99.96 FEET, BEARING S.65'25'20'E; THENCE S.47"CT5n `i2.9§'FEJT; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 116.10 FEET, A DELTA OF 1630'13' ARC OF 34.12 FEET, 'CORD .OF 33.99 FEET, BEARING S.3642'46'Et THENCE S.301T39-E.107.53 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING '-RADIUS OF 52.45 FEET. A DELTA OF EMS 14', ARC OF 7.71 FEET A 'CHORD OF 7,70 FEET. BEARING S.26T15'03-E. TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE LEAVING SAID SEAWALL NON TANGENT TO THE PREVIOUS , COURSE RUN ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 N.54-27'30-W.)A DISTANCE OF 104.21 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN S.7027'50-W. " A DISTANCE CF 45.94 ET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION W17H THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FIRST AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 12800 FEET N. 84'27'3WW. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING -2-