FLD2010-10030; 1192 BROWNS CT; KIMBERLY HOME SHELTER- t.
t
FLD2010-10030
1192 BROWNS CT
Date Received: 10/1/2010 9:02:20 AM
Kimberly Home Shelter
ZONING DISTRICT: Office
LAND USE: Residential/Office General
ATLAS PAGE: 287A
PLANNER OF RECORD:
PLANNER: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
CDB Meeting Date: December 21, 2010
Case Number: FLD2010-10030
Agenda Item: C.1.
Owner/ Applicant: The Kimberly Home, Inc.
Representative: Patricia Stough, AIA, Patti the Architect, Inc.
Address: 1192 Browns Court
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a Residential Shelter
in the Office (O) District with a lot area of 2,640 square feet, a lot
width of 48 feet, a front (south) setback of 15.4 feet (to building
and courtyard patio), a side (east) setback of 20.6 feet (to building)
and 12 feet (to courtyard patio), a side (west) setback of 3.2 feet (to
building), a rear (north) setback of 3.4 feet (to building), a building
height of 20.08 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and zero parking
spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the
provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-
1004.13 and reductions to the west and north perimeter landscape
buffers from 10 feet to 3.2 feet and 3.4 feet respectively and to
eliminate the required hedge along the west and a portion of the
north property lines, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program
under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G.
CURRENT ZONING: Office (O) District
CURRENT LAND USE
CATEGORY: Residential/Office General (R/OG)
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (two units)
Proposed Use: Residential Shelter (two units)
EXISTING North: Office (O) District
SURROUNDING Detached dwelling
ZONING AND USES: South: Office (O) District
Vacant and Attached dwellings
East: Office (O) District
Attached dwellings
West: Office (O) District
Detached dwelling
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 1 of 9
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.06 acre parcel is located on the north side of Browns Court, approximately 75 feet west of N.
Missouri Avenue. The subject property is currently developed with a two-unit, two-story attached
dwelling. The site has 48 feet of frontage along Browns Court.
Browns Court is a narrow public right-of-way that dead ends with a "cul-de-sac" that does not
meet current Code requirements. The Kimberly Home Inc. has been acquiring properties on
Browns Court to further their mission of providing housing to young, pregnant women in need of
help. All of the surrounding properties are zoned Office (O) District. The property to the north
(118 N. Missouri Avenue) is not owned by the applicant and is developed with a detached
dwelling. The property to the south (110 N. Missouri Avenue) is not owned by the applicant and
is developed with a duplex attached dwelling. The property to the east (114 N. Missouri Avenue)
is also not owned by the applicant and is developed with a detached dwelling. The property
adjacently to the west (1190 Browns Court), as well as the properties at the end of the cul-de-sac,
are owned by the applicant and are developed with residential shelters and transitional housing
for similar housing to that proposed under this application. The Kimberly Home offices and
counseling center is located to the north of the subject property at 1189 NE Coachman Road. The
property at the intersection of N. Missouri Avenue, NE Coachman Road and Drew Street is
owned by the City of Clearwater and is developed as open space and a parking area for The
Kimberly Home.
Development Proposal:
The subject property was acquired by the applicant in May 2010 and will be an extension of
residential services provided by The Kimberly Home on Browns Court and NE Cleveland Street.
The proposed Residential Shelter is not a use listed as permitted within the Office (O) District;
however, it is an Institutional use permitted by the underlying Residential/Office General (R/OG)
land use category. This use may be permitted within the Office District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project due to this use allowance under the R/OG land use category. The
proposed use is compatible with the other residential uses along Browns Court. Renovation of
this building and site will expand the provision of affordable housing for pregnant women
seeking the services of The Kimberly Home and will upgrade the appearance of this property
within this neighborhood.
The interior of both the downstairs and upstairs units will be completely renovated. The exterior
of the building will also be renovated, including new stairs to the upstairs unit. The subject
property is currently almost entirely impervious surfaces, but this proposal will remove a
significant amount of pavement and sidewalks. New landscaping will be installed, including
perimeter buffers where possible and appropriate. The applicant is not proposing to provide any
parking spaces for this shelter, as most women they house do not have vehicles.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-1001.1, the
maximum FAR for properties with a designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG) is 0.50.
The existing two-story building has a FAR of 0.50, which is consistent with the above Code
provisions.
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 2 of 9
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
1001.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.75. The proposed ISR is 0.42, which is consistent with
the above Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-1003, the minimum lot area for a similar residential-type
use of a community residential home is 6,000 square feet. The site is 2,640 square feet of lot
area. Pursuant to this same Table, the minimum lot width for a similar residential-type use of a
community residential home is 60 feet. The site has 48 feet of frontage. Properties on Browns
Court have similar or less lot area and lot width.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there are no minimum required setbacks for
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to
CDC Table 2-1003, the minimum front setback for a similar residential-type use of a community
residential home is 25 feet (parking lots may be at a minimum front setback of 15 feet). The same
table provides that the minimum side and rear setbacks for a similar residential-type use of a
community residential home is 10 feet. The proposal includes a front (south) setback of 15.4 feet
(to building and courtyard patio), a side (east) setback of 20.6 feet (to building) and 12 feet (to
courtyard patio), a side (west) setback of 3.2 feet (to building) and a rear (north) setback of 3.4
feet (to building).
Parcels on Browns Court are zoned Office (O) District, are all used residentially, are small in size
and the existing residential buildings do not meet setbacks. The setbacks with this proposal are
primarily to existing structures. The property today includes pavement at a zero-foot side and rear
setback and sidewalks at a zero-foot rear setback. This proposal includes the removal of this
pavement and the sidewalk, which will increase pervious surfaces. The existing building will be
renovated with no additions, with the exception a new stairway to the second floor unit. A new
courtyard patio is proposed on the east side of the building complying with setback requirements.
The proposal is consistent with, or an improvement over, the surrounding properties on Browns
Court. This proposed redevelopment of this site will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding properties, and it is compatible with the
residential properties on Browns Court.
Maximum Building _Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no maximum height for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
maximum height for a similar residential-type use of a community residential home is 30 feet.
The proposal includes an existing building height of 20.08 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof),
which is compatible with the surrounding area. Buildings within this area are one or two stories
in height.
Minimum Off-Street Parkinfz: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no minimum off-street
parking requirement for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-1003, the minimum required parking for a similar
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 3 of 9
residential-type use of a community residential home requires one space per two residents. It is
also noted that a Residential Shelter in the Institutional (I) District also requires one space per
two residents. Each unit is anticipated to be occupied by one woman. From this comparative
standpoint, one parking space would be required. The proposal does not include the provision of
any parking spaces on-site. The applicant notes that only a few women have had vehicles over
the 10 years The Kimberly Home has been providing housing on adjacent properties. The
applicant also notes that visitors are rare and alternate parking is available on the east side of the
Kimberly Home main building. Based on the nature of the use and the information provided by
the applicant, Staff concurs with the parking reduction to not provide any parking on-site.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment
must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. Based on
the plans submitted, mechanical equipment will be placed on the west side of the building,
adjacent to another residential shelter of The Kimberly Home.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utilities including individual distribution lines must
be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The existing building is
served by overhead utility lines. The Building/Electrical Code may require these overhead
utilities to be placed underground.
Landscaping_ The site is presently devoid of any meaningful landscaping, due to the amount of
existing impervious surfaces. The site has two existing trees and one is proposed to be removed.
This proposal includes the planting of two oak trees and a triple foxtail palm.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, a 10-foot perimeter buffer is required along Browns Court
and a 10-foot perimeter buffer is required along all sides of the property. This proposal provides
the minimum required perimeter buffers along the south (along Browns Court) and along the east
side of the property. This proposal includes, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program,
reductions to the west and north perimeter landscape buffers from 10 feet to 3.2 feet and 3.4 feet
respectively and to eliminate the required hedge along the west and a portion of the north
property lines. The reductions to the perimeter buffer width along the west and north property
lines are due to the location of the existing residential building (coincides with the setbacks).
Perimeter buffer hedging is proposed to be installed along the north property line east of the
existing residential building, along the east property line and along the south property line
adjacent to Browns Court. The request includes the elimination of the required hedge along the
west and north property lines. The existing residential building is located 3.2 feet from the west
property line and the adjacent residential building (1190 Browns Court) is also close to the
property line, placing this area for most of the day within shade. This circumstance is also true
along the north property line where the existing residential building is 3.4 feet from the property
line. The subject residential building is two stories in height and there is an existing fence along
the property line (which is proposed to be replaced due to its failing condition). In both locations,
given these circumstances, a hedge may not survive in these narrow areas and in the shade. The
site is otherwise meeting the minimum landscape standards of the Code. With the proposed
landscaping, this site will be demonstrably more attractive than the other residential parcels on
Browns Court.
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 4 of 9
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed
on the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Solid Waste: The existing building is served by black barrels for solid waste collection, which
will not change with this proposal.
Sip-naize: There will be no signage for this proposal.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject
property.
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 5 of 9
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-1001.1 and
Table 2-1004:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
FAR 0.50 0.50 X
ISR 0.75 0.42 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 2,640 sq. ft. X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 48 feet X
Maximum Height N/A 20.08 feet (midpoint of pitched X
roof)
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: 15.4 feet (to building and X'
courtyard patio)
Side: N/A East: 20.6 feet (to building) X'
12 feet (to courtyard
patio)
West: 3.2 feet (to building) X'
Rear: N/A North: 3.4 feet (to building) X'
Minimum Residential Shelter: 1 per 2 Zero parking spaces X2
Off-Street Parkin residents I required space)
i See analysis in Staff Report
2 Based on a Parking Demand Study
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 6 of 9
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
1004.13 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent In
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X1
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly I X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X'
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum
standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment
of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area
that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning
designation; or
f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or
preservation of a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X'
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines
adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance,
the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the
following design elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced
landscave design and atimonriate distances between buildines.
I See analysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 7 of 9
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X'
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of I X'
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. f
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons I X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X'
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
See analysis in Staff Report.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of November 4, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the
following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 0.06 acre parcel is located on the north side of Browns Court, approximately 75 feet west
of N. Missouri Avenue;
2. The subject property is currently developed with a two-unit, two-story attached dwelling;
3. The proposal to permit the location of a Residential Shelter on this property will be an
extension of similar uses provided by The Kimberly Home on Browns Court and NE
Cleveland Street;
4. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south), side (west) and rear (north) setbacks for
the existing residential building and to the front (south ) for a courtyard patio;
5. The proposal includes the renovation of both the building and site;
6. Renovation of this building and site will expand the provision of affordable housing for
pregnant women seeking the services of The Kimberly Home and will upgrade the
appearance of this property within this neighborhood;
7. The subject property is currently almost entirely impervious surfaces, but this proposal will
remove a significant amount of pavement and sidewalks;
8. New landscaping will be installed, including perimeter buffers where possible and
appropriate;
9. The applicant is not proposing to provide any parking spaces for this shelter, as most women
they house do not have vehicles; and
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 8 of 9
10. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-1001.1 and
Table 2-1004 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
10043 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program
criteria as per Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit a Residential Shelter in the Office (O) District
with a lot area of 2,640 square feet, a lot width of 48 feet, a front (south) setback of 15.4 feet (to
building and courtyard patio), a side (east) setback of 20.6 feet (to building) and 12 feet (to
courtyard patio), a side (west) setback of 3.2 feet (to building), a rear (north) setback of 3.4 feet
(to building), a building height of 20.08 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and zero parking
spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code (CDC) Section 2-1004.B and reductions to the west and north perimeter
landscape buffers from 10 feet to 3.2 feet and 3.4 feet respectively and to eliminate the required
hedge along the west and a portion of the north property lines, as a Comprehensive Landscape
Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G, with the following condition:
Condition of Approval:
1. That existing, on-site overhead utilities serving this building be undergrounded if required by
the Building/Electric Code.
a
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
Robert G. Tefft,
Development Review Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
? Location Map
? Aerial Map
? Zoning Map
? Existing Surrounding Uses Map
? Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBOrowns Ct 1192 Kimberly Home (O) 2010.xx -12.21.10 CDB
- WW R71Browns Ct 1192 Staff Report.doc
Community Development Board- December 21, 2010
FLD2010-10030 - Page 9 of 9
Robert G. Tefft
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
(727) 562-4539
robert.tefft(&myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
¦ Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 2008 to Present
Direct Development Review activities for the City. Supervise professional planners, land resource
specialists and administrative staff. Conduct performance reviews. Serve as staff to the Community
Development Board.
¦ Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to August 2008
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
¦ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
¦ Senior Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text
amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports.
Make presentations to various City Boards.
Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its
display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the
Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance.
Assistant Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications.
Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications,
ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other
professionals and the public.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies),
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
Z N
(p o
Ll L-1 L-1 L-1 Ll L-1 L-1 Li L-1 AALDEN
r? AVE nn?(( 5R-536
'FERN
El F?
VINE; AVE
1:1 E
Cn
Cn
N
W 3 aspecE rrn
PROSPECT A'E p? z
Y BOOTH PrAVE
(W 0
y
n
(D
2
0 0 ?
O
EWING AVE m
2
[1
0
0
o
O
O
3
W
n 5q
-
Al MARTIN LUTHER KING
AVE
O O WASHING SON AVE
WASHINGTO
O N AVE !n
r ?Y !c. Ph illios
MADISON AVER C)
C5 MADISON AVE
m zr-
0 2 MISSOURI AVE
D
N
?
n J RSON AVE JEFFERSON AVE
"V
1
AVE LINCOLN AVE r
0
as y Q INCOLN AV 0
E'
m
AVANDA m m KENWOO m
m ?E PRESCOTT AVE ?
N
00 1-4 D
O
Q
T
EJ i
` f-.-J
BETTY LA -? ~ BETTY LA
L
r? t/-????1R ~
BETTY LANE
(?
CD O
O
O h?
AVE
O 4 LADY MARY DR
a EVE AV E -Not to Scale-
?d -Nn a Survey'
MILLCREST
N o
Z <p ?
N
Ut ?
'o (D
`
D W 7K
I
c O ?
n CT
L N
N
C
° 0
0
O
O
I
O
?
v n
O
N
O
Z
Z
n
V I
D
o Q
cD
Q ?
?
N
CD
r-j
O -n
000
V °
D Ol
N
Q c
O
O
1136
>w 1142
114 1138
1140
1134 1149 1142
1150
1161 1146
N O O
1163 ?? g89?b N MADISON AVE
6g ? b?
1165 ggV
1160
rn
C 1169
1162
oy 1171
Vg?
O
m 1167 OS
n 1166
?yy
?
1169 ?y? gg?y
0 1171 1172 O 5
?
co) 117s O
g
~ 1180 G
m 1176 ??
1177 q6 1
co) 1181 yg?? b
?
1183 1180 6g
? N W
(n N O
1150
1160
1164
N O
O
O p r
N O
1184 1183 ggy`v N MISSOURI AVE
1187 1186 6g?`v
1191
1190 1190 0
a 0
v 0
ro to tz
W
14t
1197
1194 1192
0
O
Q m
A
W O
1200
a,
1201
° .,
°t 8 J w
'? 1201
1203 1200
1204
1205 1210
07
0 w
1208
1205
1208 r
%09
(
1210 1211 N JEFFERSON AVE
1212 rv m 1210 1213
A 1215
N 1214 N oW
1214
1218 1212 1217
1220 1215 1214 1221 121
9
1222
1224 -` 1217 1223 1222
1226 1219 1218 1221 127
1227
1228 1220 1229 1226
1230 1221 1222 1231
1232 1224 ?I
/V
1221 ^? t
0 -N
ot to scale-
1225 1226
1238
1238 1228 N LINCOLN
1229 1230 1221
N -Not aSurvey-
N N
W
3
Q
218
g =
Z
213
g
211
g
I=- 209
? g
O 150
Z
r207 I Del;
150
30 8401
2
21 219
g
21, 215
150
O g
Ss
Z
y
3
z
155
well ngs, w li g vc link g s
qj; 1! v I 1260 F? N C4 N N
80 65 65 40 75 75 80 75 75 ^ 80
65 65
a 'R
-I- DREW ST %0 40 "
lot P, ,n ew h O! 206.5
C4 C4 44
?. ?' I 7C I ° e i' sl e H e. N Oe? ?: 1?
. ^ 14 40 1 lv lli gs' I 'well rig I ° L-OfficesP
I I I Z \\ ??• S 3? .v as m
i - ° w Retail Z Attached attached
_" Z ,?, 97 w Dwellings Dwellings
Drsvfl,i 1?4 V3 "26
1 es,
. I ?a z I 22520
24
111 M M -011 Attached Itta>?h
W1 1
1 66.7
w "Dwellings I Dwellings
?'? s I us1 ?? '? N I N
,` hlsc? De Ic ed El A eli g .? . 1
o °n o ?, 40 10 5 40 417
f ice m I" 1 I - m- I ? Ae 50 y, 1 ab a ?o qN??I " .ro 60 0
\ \?a s.s\ 6 43 s so ss so as °? ?Vj$ D C]
GROVE GROVE ST STREET g 79.2 I 1 50 s66 61
58788
\ A 86.6 ^68.6
\ \ N N N N N N
v ' >?e? ohs ? li>8
M(.) I so Ai ch-ij
110 -5 103.512 108 209
I??' I I I I I I I I I 1 ? _?_? 111I1 s?
I I I I I I I I I I I I 10 s? ?g 11 ??---209
?1 I I OffiQes I 1 VacAnt I Vghi eo o o ? - 108 - -
I 1 1 1 1 I I I I Servi e" etil
I M ryo t- owl I 10 1-
I I h l I I I 10798 I I' 1+4 N N N N 1N.N N QI; N
- 4(S' y50 1^ 54 75 10.9.5 50 50 5B' X82^ 3^3 4[? 789
250 100 40
STREET CLEVELAND ST s so
W ?
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: The Kimberly Home, Inc. Case: FLD2010-10030
\ ?m? ml ml soI I ;:
N 75 ' ^ So so sa o o
? g
GROVE
e
a
V
e
l
v
lli>14
!a
lie
? I FI
l?i I
? ? ?
?Irr'? ??
t
l
?
I
I
I
I
g
>SbvelPli
g?s?
55 1 155 81
208
Detached
DIM 1aM N
1. 66.BN 66. B8.
301
g
308
221
g 21
g
215 21
? ? D? link g
?
80 r
75 ? r
75 '
80
Site: 1192 Browns Court Property Size: 0.06 acre
PIN: 15-29-15-12330-000-0070 Atlas Page: 287A
... ? rte.
from Browns Court at subject property
1192 Browns Court
FLD2010-10030
Page 1 of 2
View looking W at rear of residential building on subject
property
View looking NE at east side of subject property (114 N.
View looking SE from Browns Court at duplex at 110 N.
Missouri Avenue
View looking S from Browns Court at residential building at
rear of 1190 Grove Street (property to the SW of subject
property)
View looking SW from Browns Court at residential buildings at
1181 and 1183 Browns Court (both owned by Kimberly Home)
View looking NW from Browns Court at 1182 Browns Court
(owned by Kimberly Home)
View looking E at Kimberly Home main building at 1189 NE
Cleveland Street
View looking NE at parking area for Kimberly Home and open
space at intersection of NE Cleveland St., Drew St. & N.
Missouri Ave.
View looking N from Browns Court at 1190 Browns Court
(owned by Kimberly Home)
View to SW at Kimberly Home main building at 1189 NE
Cleveland Street and at 1181 NE Cleveland Street (owned by
Kimberly Home)
1192 Browns Court
FLD2010-10030
Page 2 of 2
r
i
Y
Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
?' S MIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 1?I A
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 300
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
rLD W10- 10030
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: 7'"14 E' KI n a E D93 Y 1-4 o Wl E 1 AJ G
MAILING ADDRESS: 1 l A 9 N. E Gt ?EL-?4w>O S"T'
PHONE NUMBER: ?I.4.3 - 04-7 FAX NUMBER: 3 0 -.
CELL NUMBER EMAIL: l
PROPERTY OWNER(S): -1-?1 'At- LLn " Am, i t 1 [`
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: T)p f -?+ F7-? A ,QC I!1 rr E??-? I &l) C_
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER: ?33 -177 169 FAX N MBER: 72.7 ^ 7
CELL NUMBER: Sirn. 0 O9 6 p EMAIL: T_A JE="
1"10 11144-E
. iL
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: 1< W. PROJECT VALUATION: $
STREET ADDRESS i 1 Cq Z $1590I.J A/S C_4f50 r2T C- L- L?d + F L
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 1 !5 _ 7-9 , 1 5- - I ze 330 d?fU ^ O n '7 O
PARCEL SIZE (acres): O Ac PARCEL SIZE (square feet):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 ?? . -s men-, .. . / G- e,- , . -r 17 . 'A
PROPOSED USE(S):
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
G
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (T PR), PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNf
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. GOOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
/Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
__. _ _ .. -- -A/..? X. T - - P G ?4- - - --- - -- -- - - ----- -
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
- .._. - - -- -- - - - E E-------- -? ..-- - - --- --- - -
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
C:\Documents and Settings)derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
THE KIMBERLY HOME
1192 BROWNS COURT
WOMAN'S SHELTER
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL.
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. As an interior alteration and exterior alterartion; the existing building, as built in 1928, will be
restored, but remain as is in harmony with the neighborhood residential character. The color
will be consistent with the adjoining Kimberly home properties. Although zoned office the
primary old Florida residential character of Browns court shall be maintained.
2. The renovation of this structure will be consistent with the multiple improvements already
established by the Kimberly Home on adjacent properties which they own. The improvements
to this property will increase the value of the surrounding Properties if the neighbors elect to
follow the lead of the Kimberly Home and improve their existing buildings and land.
3. The health safety and welfare of adjacent neighbors will be greatly enhanced by the use of this
building as a Pregnant Mother's Home, as opposed to the "overly occupied drug haven" its
Previous renters established.
4
Traffic will be dramatically reduced as a result of this new occupancy.
The women occupying these units will not have cars and will be limited to 2 occupants, i.e. one
per unit.
5. The immediate vicinity of the parcel consists of the Kimberly Home holdings and 3 rental units
and one single family residence. The subject parcel will be consistent in character with the
existing Kimberly home Community, the quality of which exceeds all the other surrounding
neighboring parcels.
6. The restoration of this building and utilization as a Woman's Shelter( with strict supervision and
rules) will not only minimize, but truly eliminate the on going visual, acoustic and olfactory
pollutions of the prior occupants of this parcel.
Thy Kimb¢rlg flom?, Inc.
r?z n an c 1 zso umz QzOu-
1189 NE Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 ` Phone 727-443-0471 " Fax 727-330-7677 ' www.kimberlyhome.orq
September 30, 2010
RE: Use of the (2) Units - 1192 Brown's Court
To: Planning and Development Review
Among at-risk women, an unplanned pregnancy continues to be a major cause of homelessness,
whether because of having to flee an abusive situation, sudden loss of job or income, or abandonment
by family or a partner. The serious lack of affordable housing has made the need for this type of housing
critical for this target population . The Kimberly Home Shelter and Transitional Housing Program
answers the demonstrated need of these expectant mothers in crisis by providing a secure, nurturing
environment, where they can easily access community resources, develop a plan for their future, learn
how to care for their babies and become self-sufficient, independent women.
The Shelter and Transitional Housing Program provides safe housing opportunities for this at-risk
population. Living in housing located on the property of Kimberly Home's main facility, residents in the
Shelter stay during pregnancy and for an average of three months postpartum. The Comprehensive Infill
Development approval will add to this existing program, extending the transitional period and providing
a greater opportunity for self-sufficiency. Shelter residents are assessed a housing fee based on ability to
pay and Transitional Housing residents pay rent according to the City of Clearwater Housing
Department's low-income and affordable housing scale.
A Program Coordinator with over five years' experience is responsible for daily program operations and
focuses mainly on the counseling needs, case management and program accomplishments of the
residents. All residents are mentored on a weekly basis. After delivery of their babies and graduation
from the program, the Mentor maintains contact with the client to track their progress and provide
continuing support.
In the ten years that we have been providing housing, only a few women have owned a car. Visitors
are rare to the property, and we have other on-site parking available if the need were to arise. Since we
are unable to meet the strict requirements of the Parking Ordinance (no back-out parking on commercial
property), we have decided to seek relief by not providing parking and respectfully requesting a waiver.
There will be little effect on traffic, as Brown's Court is not a through street. Kimberly Home owns all
but one house on the street. The current parking available has been more than adequate as 95% of all
residents do not own vehicles. If there is ever a need for an additional parking space, residents can park
in the agency's parking lot directly which has direct access to Brown's Court.
For further information or questions, please contact Kate Kelly at 727-443-0471, ext. 23.
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopmeni rugit:t L %,a r«, iQ,
p' Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE 1NFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is
acnlevea, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
- ------- - ----- - -- ---------
C:1Documents and Settingsklerek_ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
__i _?'T1rrG 1--- --------- -
The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
'rHa 1- bpw, 4 uao shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would ba o eignifioent economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the !cca! eccnomy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
P_ ThP propwczod use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks- and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
4-r-t- A C H
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA
1. The restoration (greater than 25% of the value of the building) requires
Site plan review and compliance with current city ordinances. Due to the age of the building
and 1928 lot sizes we are unable to meet today's parking, lot size, setback and lot width
requirements within the Office Zoning District. Without this avenue of review we would
have to demolish a structural sound building and not be able to rebuild a (2)
Unit structure which will benefit twice as many needy women.
2. The renovated Residence and new occupancy will be more in keeping with the existing
office zoning established for this parcel; the ownership by the Kimberly Home,will integrate
this parcel as part of their existing development, providing for a consistent exterior decor
and an occupancy consistent with the emerging commercial characteristics of the Land use
Plan and city zoning of this Parcel.
3. This renovation will not impede any development or redevelopment, hopefully it will
encourage more clean up of the adjacent properties.
4. There will be no detriment to the adjacent properties, conversely this renovation will be an
improvement to the quality of life and buildings
on Browns Court.
5. The proposed Shelter, as an Institutional use under the underlying Residential/Office
General Land use category, through the utilization of the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Program is allowable.. This proposed use "provides for the provision of
affordable housing"; through the intercession of the Kimberly Home, the occupant will pay
a minimum amount of rent, which will then be saved for their use, upon moving out; as a
deposit or down payment on the next place they may live. Hopefully giving the Mom and
child a "headstart" on their new life together. This particular property is on the fringe of the
Kimberly Home Complex (Ref: Adjoining Property Plan Sheet A-1);as such, it is compatible
with the adjacent land uses and will not substantially alter the essential use characteristic of
the neighborhood. This similar use as Housing is unique to the Kimberly Home, a rezoning
would not be compatible with the Residential and Office uses within this area.
6. The proposed "renovation" of this existing Duplex and request for flexibility relative to the
parking requirement will encourage the orderly development of the surrounding area. The
applicable design guidelines for the Downtown area are respectfully being utilized in the
design modifications to this exiting building. The scale and intensity of this existing building
exemplify the old Florida characteristics of Browns Court, The sensitive re-use and material
selections for this building totally emulate the surrounding Kimberly Home properties. The
Horizontal Building Plans are accentuated by a change in building materials, Pilasters and
new balconies, railings will provide for vertical accents while providing accessibility. The
fenestration will follow the already established 1928 appeal of the building utilizing modules
and groupings of windows, as exist. A minimal step back from the front is provided thru the
extensions of the front Bedrooms; resulting in a varied gable roof form. The Buffering to
properties not owned by The Kimberly home shall be maintained and enhanced thru new
Landscaping.
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITT MENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
W/A STORMWATER NARRATIVE M T BE MITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
SEQ. IAJGr P.4 G e .
? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stonmwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided. 4 6 n
PkX A av &-? I
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SSJPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
Q- TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location,
dluding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? G I-r-?f 10.0-0 v r b e_^'"o -
O TR INVENTORY; prepared by a `certified arborist, of all trees 4' DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
h trees; C t p2ov r 4 ?j
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
{ r w Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
/''shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; k)/,-
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); V/14-
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; /V/14
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
STORMWATER
The existing Parcel of 2,640 sf is currently 81 % impervious, with drainage sheet flowing to Browns
Court, a partially asphalt and brick paved substandard ROW. The adjacent property to the north
generously shares their storm water along our north property line, causing water intrusion, mold
and mildew; thru the existing rear access door.
We will rectify this existing unfavorable drainage situation by providing roof drains, removing the
rear door, modifying the rear grade, which will then attenuate the sheet flow of new storm water
and the neighboring waters within our property. We will remove all asphalt and the exist concrete
drive. Thru the utilization of Brick pavers, shell and landscaping the parcel will be enhanced with
a impervious surface ratio of 42%. This 50% reduction will minimize the storm discharge into the
Browns Court drainage system.
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
w/ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
OV/14 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
.,?/ (North arrow;
./ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
?AII dimensions;
?ogtprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
/Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
?All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
r?ocation of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
ocation of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
tand water lines;
4//? AII parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
^/ A Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); R?7pe:7 ?71.4 4_
'-Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
oor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
? Level Two approval.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
EXISTING
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
Ur' REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/. X 11);
REQUIRED PROPOSED
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Ofisite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
?All existing and proposed structures;
?Names of abutting streets;
L,--"Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
'Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
s edule;
VS'
lant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
fisting and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
y ical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
otective measures;
I error landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
ercentage covered;
onditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
rrigation notes.
/REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11);
C2 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exco ' - ;nimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
1/ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information:
?Alt sides of all buildings
? Oi nsioned
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 %X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
Alto S?G?S
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8 '/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a -Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
fair Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
_ Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
6 ' Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this // day of
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and C91",>6. ,- A.D. 20 fu to me and/or by
photograph the property described in this application- who is personally kno has
produced
f/(i as identification.
/? 796Lr/ J,PK a LEANNA S. SHOW
r* .`n _ Notary Publk - SIM,@ of Flor
_.------- a. ?KComm,-&0r1WJ1d 1-7.-2017
property owner or repr entative Notary public,
Signature
of
'?'FOF c?oP? ` Commission OD A06
My commission xpires. •__,_,_
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
2. title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
That (1 a ear the owner(s) and record
/
// 9? fr-y?•? s C'1' ?IPC1 i'u?c7?e?2 Fl- 73755
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
?0M t-,e lPrts/Ue? ?s7_ 1L- eCYPU _O Tm4c- _
4. That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
-Pellll Sze %rchilkci Tic
as (hi thei"r agent(s) to execute any petitions o7 other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. Thal ))the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Propwrty Owner Property Owner
?
f
kner 1 x tecrF ue?i rr ??C Eo Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
ppeared a/rrrr ////?f who having been first duly sworn
C -45'10 personally a
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
"1466 1", LEANNA S. allow
ip4 yS?
-• { ++a.n? FuONc - aaa of Fiorih
• •? ? Catla?. EyNrt dttl 17. Z01t ? , ? _ , - _ _._ _
?,?
r Cc 11118ttlo?IODsom
••°
fill IM?11Nwa1?A11L Notary Public Signature
Notary ea St m My Commission Expires:
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
Prepared: By and Return to:
Donna L. Crino an employee of.
Republic Land and Title, Inc.
4175 Woodlands Parkway
Palm Harbor, FL. 34685
File Number: 10-0227 OR
Warranty Deed
Made this May 27, 2010 A.D. By REBECCA M. MODICA, widow and surviving spouse of JOSEPH N. MODICA, JOHN
WOHLBERG AND MELISSA WOHLBERG, HUSBAND AND WIFE, whose address is: 711 San Salvador Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698
hereinafter called the grantor, to THE KIMBERLY HOME, INC, a Tlorida not for Profit Corporation,
whose post office address is: 1189 N. E. Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 , hereinafter called the grantee:
(Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" include all tho parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of
individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations)
Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sutra of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations,
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee,
-all that certain land situate in. Pinellas County, Florida, viz:
Lot 7, BROWN'S COURT, a subdivision according to the plat thereof recorded at Plat Book 10, Page 58, in the Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Parcel ID Number: 15-29-15-12330-000-0070
't'ogether with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor
has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend
the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing
subsequent to December 31, 2009.
DEED Individual Warranty Deed - regal on Face
Prepared By and Return to:
Donna L. Crino an employee of.
Republic Land and Title, Inc.
4175 Woodlands Parkway
Palm .Harbor, FL. 34685
File Number. 10-0227 OR
In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
Aow-.? 6-1-1CP
Witness Printed Name
A '
Witness Printed Name mfr u /S? / \ . ?? ?ii
fit!;! C (Seal)
C
ECCA M. O ICA
' e CSC/"
(Seal}
JO WOHLBERG
State of : Florida
County of: Pinellas
0 V
MELISSA WOHLBERG
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this May 27, 2010, by REBECCA M. MODICA, JOHN WOHLBERG, MELISSA
WOHLBERG, who is/are personally known to me or who has produced Drivers License(s) as identification.
]Votary ublic
Print Name: 7bax&1A- L- N(}
My Commission
ONNA L. CRINO
ublic - State o! Florida
xpires Apt 4, 2013
m. E
ission # DD 855385
rough National Notary Assn.
ffm
DFFD Individual Warranty Deed - Legal on Face
REMOVE WOOD
AND MTL FENCE
SHARE PVC FENI
REMOVE EXIST WOOD FENCE INSTALL NEW 6'-O" H PVC FENCE TO MATCH
BROWN'S COURT 16' ROW
KIMBERLY HOME WOMEN'S SHELTER 1192 BROWNS COURT
TO REMAIN 10111110
11112M0 rev.
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/81' = 1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION
03 SCALE: 1 /8"
PATRICIA M. STOUGH, AIA (727) 733-3769
0
'o
fiatti,
IIII II
?_¦ architwt, Inc.
sa
m 1634 SAN ROY DRIVE, DUNEDIN, FL 34698
PARCH@GATE.NET 0002103
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 11-0"
PATRICIA M. STOUGH, AIA (727) 733-3769
a ? •? ?atti?
a? Hill
?
a
¦-¦ architect, inc.
1634 SAN ROY DRIVE, DUNEDIN, FL 34698
PARCH@GATE.NET 0002103
KIMBERLY HOME
SHELTER
1192 BROWNS COURT
CERTAINTEED VINYL SIDING
CAROLINA BEADED 6 112"
AUTUMN YELLOW
VERTICLE TRIM
ANTIQUE SLATE
7056-4
TRIM AND STAIRS
CLOUD WHITE
7153-1
PAINT EXIST BLOCK
TO MATCH VINYL
PORTER PAINTS PALE CITRUS
#6217-2
N
• LL
LL
0
2? o
?a
PROPERTY OF OTHERS
N90' 00'„00' E_ 4
Q
2.7' WALK M
...?
20. i'
0.9' ON SITE
3.5'
w
V
z
w
ti
0
0
?o
0.5' ON SITE
F
O
J
3
Q"
1C
•
FH
T
47.68' (M) •Sple
N90' 00' 00' F- 48.00' (9)
'moo
eA
r ?
Z
m
N
?c
C?.
J?
N
BOUNDARY SURVEY
0
( 00' 6' Woo FENCE
S.6' ON SITE
24.4'
ASPHALT
Y
Q
w
r
v v •.
V
? ?
w
1
.. ?A
Y
?
J ?
•
'
I
W
24.6'
WALK
•
Ic
I t
3.2'
720.7'. ui
EWAY
Y
N90' 00' 00' E
16' PAVEMENT
ASPHALT
BROWNS COURT
(16' RIGHT-OF-WAY)
4:
NREV DRAWN BY: WGM CREW CHIEF; MGM
CHECKED BY: MBF F. B. FILE
SCALE: i' ° 10' FIELD WORK: 05/26110
502H DATA FILE: 100502
JOB N0. 100
oV ? I I
1. i' ON SITE
2
0
Z
NO
O
N90' 00' 00' E 46.00'
CERTIFIED T0:
THE KIMBERLY HOME
CITY OF CLEARWATEA HOUSING DIVISION
ts successors andlcr assigns
REPUBLICrLAND GaTITLE, INC.
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S REPORT/NDTM
CCN Cn
3
LSD
LSD
O
O
Z
H44<
i0'
0' 1.01 20
30'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE J5 EAST)
LOT BOOK 7 10,RPAGE S 58COURT, , PINELLAS COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDSSOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
THIS HERESMAYE13ENSETBACKS, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS ,FAND/OR OTHER MATTERS OF A CURRENT TITLE RECORD WHICH COULD AFFECT THE PROPERTY AND/OR BOUNDARIES.
T
GRAPHIC SCALE - FEEL
MONAMWAG S. FAR
8131 Meadowview Place, New Pori Xlc h7271 loria 74! 4
Phone: (727) 375-1740
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP IWOWTIOK
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER: 121030-0108-H DATED: 0511112005
1 THE PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE 'X'
` THE BASE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION 15 NIA MEAN SEA LEVEL.
M THE
TH IS
J
N
Y
R
POLICY.
. B
CURRENT TITLE
A
OF
ENEFIT
THERE NAY BE SETBACKS, EASEMENTS,
AHD/OA OTHER NATTERS OF
RESTRICTIONS
1!) ,
RECORD NNICH COULD AFFECT THE PROPERTY
Z } AND/OR BOUNDARIES.
THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON
2
RING
11] `L .
BROWNS COURT BEA
NI
THE THEN T
>
3 SUNEO)
AS
(
N901 00' 00' W
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON
Q I 3.
N. G. V. D. 1929
L
}-{ 4, BENCHMARK:
5. CALCULATED INFORMATION IS BASED ON
LAT INTENT
.
CONCEPTUAL RECREATION OF P
ALL PROPERTY DIMENSIONS ARE RECORD
6
:0 _ .
NLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
U DIMENSIONS ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET AND
7
0
h-I .
DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF.
11
SA6 SS COURT
YS
N
I
PH
ARE INACCES
CORNERS
9' REAR
H,
?Zo
LEGW-
rL • CENTERLINE
A • CENTRAL ANGLE
A ARC LENGTH
IONER
A
LCULATED
(C1 C
S CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE
CHB
CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE
CONC. CONCRETE
CB/CH CHORD BEARINGICHORD
ELEV. = ELEVATION
FCM • FOUND CONCRETE NOMM14T
FDH FOUND DRILL HOLE
FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD
IRON ROD
FIR
FRD FOUND
FNT FOUND NAIL G TIN
FDUNO OPEN END PIPE
FOEP
FPP = FOUND PINCHED PIPE
IVING FLOOR
LOWEST
L.L.F.
• LOWSUIED
NIA = NOT APPLICABLE
B OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
(P)
P. B. PLAT BOOK
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
POC ° POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
R • RADIUS
(A) RECORD
SET BRIL
IN
N
L
T
G
MAAIL
w
SCIA 1I2' SET CAPPED IRON ROD 05545
U.E. U12' SET IRON ROD
TILITY EASEMENT
• FENCE LINE
CERTIFICATIOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS NAME
WITH THE IMUM
472 27
UNDER MY TECHNICAL DIRECT BY THE FLOASDAVBDAPO OFCOMPLIESPROFESSIONAL LAND
FLORIDARSTATUTESP?ALSO,CTHE SKETCH SH NN HEkONIA PURSUANT AND ACCURATE
BENEFIT O O THE E&0 ST OOF My RANCENOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND
REPRESENTATION OF WITHOUT SAID T PROPERTY
WAS SUBJECT TO NOTES AND NOTATIONS SHOWN HEREON.
?l 05/26/2010
DA
IMIIIAIOIAD 8, fAA, P. L 5. •5?,N15
Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
CASE NUMBER:
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: r"SFye L?
MAILING ADDRESS: 1189 1`/ F-=. cLF,
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: NIA
PROPERTY OWNER(S): _K 1 Wi A F__
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: _ P_-A--T=1 = ?A G Q
MAILING ADDRESS: I e.3 17
PHONE NUMBER: -733 -377 6
CELL NUMBER: 56 Q -Q' 9 _
FAX NUMBER: ,_? 3 p -
EMAIL: K KCL.LY Ca -_K (I` me &-)-_Y 14 0
FAX NUMBER: "7 3 3 -
EMAIL: P.0,92r--W
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
?-l? t2?rlnLadc.. 0?-
r_0 r E XI S 7- e7 Ak: ME S E
+..Q_ is _F> +e .t etJ G?._ S_s P .a Q,S.
7-H .4e.1 "T}f lti t iO coo
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDeskl
caw '0 .S'741 e-t •i ez-C. e
. OR G
M j+/-; v 10 VS C p F=AQ h ?4 L$
?-r?L??r-ra ?•T-?l,/G O#- tv r? .?t ?.o is
R._'r.R-t?1 t1 _
}2E Q J f ?° 'E?`t i?".S . "' J?'EW ?. t?'`( L+ t G i?t" lV /'
I+AL-1, L4 e. tj 7- Tw-&Z- CA P0 1^1a
oplplanningforms 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 1 of 2
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
- 4 ?- FK. 1-'52r S r, -&Lc / , Lo -r-s -rn -tom{ c_r 4 JJ s -r r'/ j , c_ pg? 14 Cn Q E
IA &-2 4 L t_ ?e }P-we-i >-JIE C P U ' I M I L-,& el- t ,4,-P%Jj J_!g e --A4 VO I /V G
A N 0.-? en, I Aj A- J61 an 4Al tJ s c_o J 9¢.--r 4-Al 1? c.. -r- dEy L-Y TRe n 0&1 C-
U)FI Ift e? M 1 4JG 4 K11?) <ZWA4.UE-d7 Ld!`f?-f -I-IS AL C2 17 11-1 'Q AJ #44- Lo'
t04 Inc C A%4' I .nJ 4
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
j:kt!& 4-A P Z-0 T°L
"1? F- Jam:) a C'? e- (A) Cg 1 I nf L--L'j O E. o P
-c.iJ- A,I -.I '.- Tr- ii C."= - c.L//' 1 . -/ . J. 10 J.ir- t-1 ....,_/
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Nva
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
ILLc?i
Signa re of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _,3_ day of
bout w? ? r A.D. 20J ! _ to me and/or by
K..dhlet ILz Il who is rsonall?r known has
produced
as identification.
Notary pub' ,/
My com ion expires:
Notwy ftft - airof f1u"
• ?ral?lll. ? u.teu
COMON" r ootor
M1MAI?J11MurMnltlaa
C:iDocuments and Settingsiderek.fergusonlDesktopiplanningfo?ms 070AComprehenstve Landscape Program 0424-07.doc
Page 2 of 2