FLD2010-09027; 1315 CLEVELAND ST; WORKNET/COORDINATED CHILD CAREFLD2010-09027
1315 CLEVELAND ST
Date Received: 9/1/2010 1:48:35 PM
Worknet/Coordinated Child Care
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE:
ATLAS PAGE: 287B
PLANNER OF RECORD: S -K
PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: November 16, 2010
Case Numbers: FLD2010-09027
Agenda Item: C. 3.
Owner/Applicant: Nemishawn, Inc
Representative: Kevin Bessolo, Bessolo Design Group, Inc.
Addresses: 1315 Cleveland Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development Application to permit a governmental use
(WorkNet Pinellas and Coordinated Child Care), in the Commercial
(C) District within the East Gateway Character District with a lot
area of 91,093 square feet, a lot width of 250 feet (along Cleveland
Street), 364 feet (along Lady Mary Drive), 363 feet (along Fredrica
Drive, a front (north) setback of 17.5 feet(to existing building), a
front (west) setback of 10 feet (to existing pavement) and 83.5 feet
(to existing building), a front (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing
pavement) and 85.2 feet (to existing building), a side (south) setback
of 15 feet (to existing pavement) and 155.4 feet (to existing
building), a building height of 23 feet (to midpoint of roof) and 111
parking spaces as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-
704.C.
CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District
CURRENT LAND USE Commercial General (CG)
PLAN CATEGORY:
DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN CHARACTER East Gateway
DISTRICT:
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Governmental Use
EXISTING North: Commercial (C) District
SURROUNDING Overnight Accommodations
ZONING AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District
Attached Dwellings
East: Commercial (C) District
Vehicle Service
West: Downtown (D) District
Attached Dwellings
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 1 of 9
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 2.09 acre site is located on the south side of Cleveland Street between Fredrica Drive and
Lady Mary Drive, which is located in the East Gateway Character District of Downtown. The
East Gateway is characterized by a mixed land use pattern of residential housing interspersed with
pockets of poorly maintained rental properties and outdated strip commercial. The East Gateway
struggles with a negative image of crime due to the location of problematic uses such as day labor
facilities, old motels and social service agencies that provide services to the homeless population.
This parcel was previously occupied by Aqua Clara Water Bottling and most recently as an office
use for Energy Utility Consultant's which closed in 2009 after a fire gutted the interior of the
building. The building has since been made safe with the necessary interior renovations. The site
contains an existing 12,265 square foot building and 111 parking spaces.
To the north of the subject property, across Cleveland Street, is overnight accommodations
(Regal Motel). To both the south and west are attached dwellings and to the east is vehicle
service.
Development Proposal:
On September 1, 2010, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application was submitted for the
subject property. The impetus for the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application is the
fact that the existing pavement at both the front (west) and front (east) is setback only 10 feet
instead of 15 feet. Additionally the covered entry at the front (north) is setback only 17.5 feet
instead of 25 feet. The application proposes to establish a governmental use within the existing
12,265 square foot building. WorkNet Pinellas will occupy approximately two thirds of the
western portion of the building and Coordinated Child Care will occupy the remaining eastern
third of the building. WorkNet Pinellas develops strategies to target the needs of employers then
matches them to job seekers across the employment spectrum - from assisting those seeking
entry level positions into the workforce to cultivating workers to fill coveted high skill/high
demand positions. Coordinated Child Care provides resource and referral information for
families seeking subsidized childcare and offers services for preschoolers in child care who have
special needs.
The existing building and associated off-street parking area will remain unchanged with the
exception of the restriping of some parking spaces and a handicap walkway, ADA ramp
modifications and the addition of three doors and two windows.
As there will be no building additions or modifications to the existing site improvements, there
will be no impact upon the F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot area/size, maximum building height
and/or minimum setback development standards with this proposal.
Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: In addition to the Clearwater Comprehensive
Plan, the Downtown Plan is the official statement of policy regarding the Downtown and in
particular with regard to the use of land and public policies. All development of land, both public
and private, undertaken within the Downtown shall be consistent with and further the goals of
the Plan.
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 2 of 9
The site is located within the East Gateway character district of the Clearwater Downtown
Redevelopment Plan. This being the case the proposal is governed by the Commercial (C)
District zoning with regard to intensity, density and setbacks while also having to be consistent
with the East Gateway Character District policies. This area is envisioned to be a vibrant, stable,
diverse neighborhood defined by its unique cultural base and mixed land uses. It will continue to
be developed as a low and medium density residential neighborhood supported with
neighborhood commercial and professional offices concentrated along the major corridors of
Cleveland Street, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Court Street and Missouri Avenue.
Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown
Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the development proposal has been determined to be
consistent with the following Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies:
Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office
and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential
projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a
revitalized Downtown.
Vision: The elimination of blighting conditions and the revitalization of the existing and
expanded CRA are critical to the future health of Downtown.
Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and
recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents
and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping
destination.
Objective IE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to
provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for
Downtown residents.
Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for
renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all
projects must be consistent.
East Gateway Character District Policies: The following policies governing development
within the East Gateway character district have been reviewed and have been determined to be
applicable to the development proposal:
Policy 12: Encourage the adaptive re-use of underutilized buildings in the event
redevelopment is not feasible.
Downtown Design Guidelines:
The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with
regard to various elements associated with new construction and renovations in the Downtown.
A review of these Guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items
were identified:
Community Development Board - November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 3 of 9
Block and Lot Characteristics: The Downtown Design Guidelines require the retention of the
existing street grid pattern where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment. All three
street frontages are being maintained with sidewalks to contribute to the pedestrian environment.
Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines require parking
lots to be as unobtrusive as possible and screened from view from rights-of-ways. The proposal
provides for a landscape screening on all three rights-of-way.
Landscaping: The Downtown Design Guidelines require plant species that are appropriate to the
space in which they will occupy with regard to water needs, growth rates, size, etc. in order to
conserve water, reduce maintenance and promote plant health. The proposal includes some
native species with appropriate maturity size to limit maintenance and conserve water.
Windows and Doors: The Downtown Design Guidelines require windows and doors that are
appropriately sized for the scale and style of the building on which they are located. As discussed
previously the only building modifications are the addition of windows and doors which have
been found to be sized for the scale and style of the existing building.
Community Development Code: A governmental use project is subject to the relevant review
criteria of (CDC) Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704.C.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the Commercial General
(CG) land use category and (CDC) Section 2-701.1, the maximum allowable FAR is 0.55. The
proposed governmental use will have a FAR of 0.13.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the Commercial
General (CG) land use category and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.90.
The proposed ISR is 0.74, which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area for a governmental use is 10,000 square feet. Pursuant to the
same Table, the minimum lot width is 100 feet. The lot width along Cleveland Street is 250 feet,
the lot width along Lady Mary Drive is 364 feet and the lot width along Fredrica Drive is 363
feet all of which are consistent with the Code provisions for governmental uses.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum setbacks required for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the front
setback for governmental uses is 25 feet, the side setback is 10 feet and the rear setback is 20
feet. There is no rear setback as this parcel has three fronts. The existing building has setbacks of
a front (north) setback of 17.5 feet (to existing building), a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to
existing pavement) and 83.5 feet (to existing building), a front (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing
pavement) and 85.2 feet (to existing building), and a side (south) setback of 15 feet (to existing
pavement) and 155.4 feet (to existing building). While all the existing setbacks do not meet the
criteria of CDC Section 2-704; they are consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
provisions. As mentioned previously there will be no building additions or modifications to the
existing site improvements.
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 4 of 9
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum height for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
maximum height for a governmental use can range from 25 - 50 feet. The height of the existing
building is 23 feet (to midpoint of roof). The proposal is consistent with this Code provision.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum required parking for
governmental uses is 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As such, 50
parking spaces are required. The site currently has 111 parking spaces. The proposal is consistent
with this Code provision.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles.
Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize a refuse dumpster located in the rear western area of the
parking lot. The dumpster will be screened from the right-of-way with a stucco enclosure. The
proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Landscaping; Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15-foot wide landscape
buffer along Cleveland Street, a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along both Lady Mary Drive and
Fredrica Avenue and a south landscape buffer width of 10 feet. The existing landscaped buffer
along Cleveland Street is 17.5 wide, the buffers along both Lady Mary Drive and Fredrica
Avenue are 10 feet wide and the south landscape buffer is 15 feet wide. The proposal provides
for replacement of any declining or missing shrubs.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation planting shall be provided for 100 percent of
the building facade along a street right-of-way. A minimum five foot wide landscaped area shall
be installed along the facades and landscaped with the required trees and shrubs. The proposal
includes foundation landscaping of crape myrtles, viburnum and ground cover.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the vehicular use area must contain
landscape islands a minimum of 150 square feet in size. However, if the proposal includes 110
percent or more of the required parking, 12 percent of the vehicular use area must contain
landscape islands. As the applicant has provided more than 110 percent of the required parking,
14.8 percent of the vehicular use area has been proposed to be interior landscape plantings.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues.
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 5 of 9
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704:
Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.55 0.13 X
I.S.R. 0.90 0.74 X
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet 91,093 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 250, 363 and 364 feet X
Maximum Building Height 25 - 50 feet 23 feet (to midpoint of roof) X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 25 feet North: 17.5 feet (to building) X
17.5 feet (to pavement)
West: 83.5 feet (to building) X
10 feet (to pavement)
East: 85.2 feet (to building) X
10 feet (to pavement)
Side: 10 feet South: 155.4 feet (to building) X
15 feet (to pavement)
Minimum Off-Street Parking 4 spaces/1,000 sf GFA 111 parking spaces X
(50 parking spaces)
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 6 of 9
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
704.C. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
Inconsistent
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 7 of 9
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of October 7, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having ;reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That, the 2.09 acre site is located on the south side of Cleveland Street between Fredrica
Drive and Lady Mary Drive;
2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial
General (CG) Land Use Plan category;
3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown
Redevelopment Plan as the property is located within the East Gateway Character District;
4. That, the property is presently vacant;
5. The applicant, Nemishawn, Inc., proposes to establish a governmental use on the subject
property;
6. That the proposal has no impact upon the following development standards: F.A.R., I.S.R.,
minimum lot area/size, setbacks and maximum building height, as they presently exist;
7. The proposal includes 111 parking spaces; and
8. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the district vision of the East Gateway
Character District of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Table 2-701.1 of the
Community Development Code;
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 8 of 9
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
704.C of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development Application to permit a governmental use (WorkNet Pinellas and
Coordinated Child Care), in the Commercial (C) District within the East Gateway Character
District with a lot area of 91,093 square feet, a lot width of 250 feet (along Cleveland Street),
364 feet (along Lady Mary Drive), 363 feet (along Fredrica Drive, a front (north) setback of 17.5
feet(to existing building), a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to existing pavement) and 83.5 feet
(to existing building), a front (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing pavement) and 85.2 feet (to
existing building), a side (south) setback of 15 feet (to existing pavement) and 155.4 feet (to
existing building), a building height of 23 feet (to midpoint of roof) and 111 parking spaces as
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 2-704.C., with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That, all landscaping be installed prior to the issuance of a business tax receipt;
2. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the
buildings be painted the same color as the building;
3. That a building permit be obtained for the proposed windows and doors; and
4. That all signage be permitted separately.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff.
,A Scott Kurleman, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-09027 - Page 9 of 9
l?ta
View of front (north) side of subject building
along Cleveland Street.
AVOW"
View of west side of subject building.
1315 Cleveland Street
Case Number FLD2010-09027
Page 1 of 1
i?
View of east side of subject building.
11 113 112
100
11 1 1
11 111 110 111
10 106
105 1
10
10 109
107 105
105 102
100 d
Z 11
"
10 w e 0
N h? h
N N 30 0 3'
28 Q
21 2° 2 3
2
O 1 27 Z 2
rn 22 Q
21 24 W
W 22
N a N' ^ N 2
18 15 20
17 1
13 J 7
0 0 Z 11
v
N W
Z
5
d'
N R W O
7 O O
M N
? C b W
r P - `?
- M M
L --------- ----- r CLEVELAND ST
1265
^,51
0 1 Q o ?1,?g
M
•M- q
q
20 1
Z PARK ST
O W T J '
2 N
N
12 ? NN N
1 ?
?
100
VVll t
10
?Qa? v o N N 1 26 m N
v'
1
1,56
0
O ?? M
10
? 1 71
M M M M M y
M M M
^ ,b N
a
^ M 1O2 7
J ao N O
?o °
M M M M
b
n
N '"^
7r
?,
CE ST
100 0
?
N 20 `^' M M
., M c
i M so n
M M
1247
N ^ry ^ryry°
^ ry
NN °'? j
5
2
L
203 ]21
^ N ',w ai M ,?.? 20 20
5
218
2,09
Zp0
211 22
Z04 22,
?°
1
Zp9 Z
Y1 215
217 224
208
21 22 219
212 213
12 m ?9
22
221 4
o M "' M M 22
214 21
Q M
22 o m 30
300
N
? 30 NN N c?
30
N
302 qn4
305 M
3p) 308
ZONING MAP
Owner: Nemishawn, Inc. Case: FLD2010-09027
Site: 1315 Cleveland Street Property Size: 2.09 Acres
PIN: 15-29-15-12276-005-0010 Atlas Page: 287B
Z WASHINGTON AVE
(D f A V
I AVE
?l c7
MADISON AVE
cn
o
w
(p
(D
3
` U' m
m o
m `?"?
?
n . MISSOURI AVE
Cn
<
US-19 ALT.
N
rn
?
??
f (
JEFFERSON AVE
?
? ?ERSON AVE
Ol
o ;Q
?a? ?I
Z)
El
11
O
(D
AVE
LI
NCOLN
AVE
VE
O I Ip LINCOLN A
0 l? l
KEN4VOCD
m
m
PRESCOTT AVE
O 6Efi LA BETTY LA
,?d M4
ti BETTY
A? M FREDRI AVE
O q LADY ARY DR
D
Q Q m
' EVERGREEN ?? AVE
[ m 0
(c)
N N'
N
T AVE HILLCREST AVE ?HILLCREST DR
?_ m .. M
0 ORANGEVIEW AVE
c
co
W b
D
0 7q
to z rn?
AVE SAN REMO AVE HILLTOP AVE
?
(D
O
?O
O ? ?
?
a m ?J lI
MARIVA
?
n
AVE
??
? m
m
CR-375 HIGHLAND
?? ? ? ? -Not to Scale-
AVE GLENWOOD
-Not nSurvey- I
=) ?Cl R
KII[I"A
112
1 1 ' e
' s 111 z ?10 ]
- - - ° 100
_ _13 12 11
1 7 0
- _ - n
11 5 L'J 10
111
1
u10 1109 „ - ]
s O 1Q5'4
- 2 cI - e - 9 10 1JL5 - _
8
1 ro 8 6
1 - W 7 a N s ---- 10
,0 o Q O
p Ier11 I ,? 141p15
- - - - 9 _
Q 31 18 1s 3
-
r to -
-h
'E-• - ? i
• ?/
!?
C73 A
V
10
3 27
= 20
2Aj
- - "- 12 - - 2
- - 12 24 Z' I
!
I?
N
31
26 27 28 I 2B I
_ ?Y/ 4 - tt 2A
12
j? 21 22 _23 - 12 -
13
17 25 24 R r j 13 N
2 22 1
J
15 20-
-3
1 5 Uj _
1
18 I 18
- N 6 - 13 -
? ? ? 16
1; 28 27
z
29 14
C I I 14
?J s1 14
1 I c °183411 2
_
?1 5? 1543 r 2
r-
7 11 9 1 ip 15 ,61 r
I 1]118
73?? 69
P
Ir' 1
1,96° 22101113 51? ti
21 L
o -
°p 112113 41 5
1
N I R I 1 i 1 2 ir,1 1 1
3 I I I 1 1' "' P21?21 1 (h (`i I I
es
Retail Sale/Servic k
s s B s Overnight accommod ations r- 1
$
h h h 4890
? 7
I I IN 1 1 q1 1
I l q L
c
I
1651
1
t
N
I? I e_ I
I I I I 71!
1 1
1 III 1 1
1 1
I
1 I X_
al I T A, -27
I
1 1
1
1
M >\
1
/
5
141] 1
101
,51 Bp4 13113I
z
21 1
i 1 9 IB 17
B
615 1J 211 Vehicle Service 7 8
5 413
2 1 1
4
13 13/2 1 /
14'
1
-J
Attached Dwellings
'-' L1 -
11 12 -1
- - , 1
9 11 4P
y ?%B / 4
1
° ]
1 111
1 ] F
rI °i r1 i i i 111 I u1s 1?
111 •1] S? t
1eI'9 -
It] 18
-° 4
1121 1 _
-
- -74 3 -
112 13 14 151,°
17
6 0 I I I 1 7_?
.5.
,9 0 1 4
1
W ?
1 1 - -
M
W
,A 5 8
-
18 7 8
4"3 t?
- -
t? f? OI
126
11 '
-1 1 8 ° 2
3 9 7
19 20
3 1 1
10 918
P-54 I3 211
5
}}}}}}pppppp I I 1
10I
7
8 5 4 3 1 1'
10
r
f
1
2?
3 1211y/
9 81]Ifi 5 4IJ 2 1
kk??
15 14 13 12 11 I 10
1 52 56 1 sn
Attached Dwellings 26 40 C4431 2 i
g `N 2 z 0Y 1
C
W
L J I
'1 4 00 e
\ 01 + - r I y Ste- 6533 ^ 3t
^
N h^
N
^
14 2
C r M "" e-
3 2 1 1 R T S a? SeM.
L_ 7135 9 M 20
M 1
e. e. 2
1 21
20
?
ry
3
07 9 8
11 I 7 N 9 4
25
?l 1 4
3 z ,
21
26 /
27
? 'F
?y1\ 2 •
t L 18
20? 17 I ^ 7e-is- sO 1 2
?// "
(` Z
L 2058 a 21
207 r
5 3 2 , \
D 18 i
2 O 2159 L_.
51 '1 2OH
X1(11
20 /8 L1 I
- '-I
8 75- _ - 6
-
/ 8 3
/ 9 10 9 2 O 22
18
19 21
22 230
14 7 ' /
9 14
- /
- O y
1 1 y
h 4h 1`B n
8
/ 1 2111
10 1^ 12,T 1? 14
n 1?` M
M
1
21 2 aN-
21 43,
2'1
221 2
0
- I ill 10 ep} ^ e? e• w
e
` e- 2
12 //1
11 12 / / 1 B
13
1 1
n $
J? 311
14 I I 6
\ C 3
$
2
OF ANKLIN T 1
I S 4 3
2 '
e.
3
0 30 z ,
q
? .
M
n
\ 3122 2t 3O 2
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: Nemishawn, Inc. Case: FLD2010-09027
Site: 1315 Cleveland Street Property Size: 2.09 Acres
PIN: 15-29-15-12276-005-0010 Atlas Page: 287B
Resume
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4553
scott.kurleman a mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner III
• Planner II
August 2008 to present
June 2005 to August 2008
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual,
variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to
determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings.
Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City
officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and
presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings.
•, Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with
City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to
ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing
condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of
Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to
monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree
permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical
tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on
public and private properties.
• Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996
Groveland, FL
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and
private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers
regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees.
• Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company 1991 -1993
Clearwater, FL
Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance.
• Store Manager
William Natorp company, Inc. 1983-1991
Cincinnati, OH
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for
teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment
maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared
for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
GRADUATE - Certificate: Communi , Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHFLORIDA,
TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA.
Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management
AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414.
t
`f'???r,r Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1, 2 0 5 .
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Nemishawn, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 1111 7th Avenue North,- Ste 107, St. Petersburg, FL 33705
PHONE NUMBER: 894-1691 FAX NUMBER: (727) 894-1430
_
CELL NUMBER EMAIL: (727) 894-1661
PROPERTY OWNER(S): em1 S awn , nc .
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Kevin J. Bessolo, Bessolo Design Group, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 556 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
PHONE NUMBER: 727 894-4453 -FAXNUMBER: (727) 896-8662
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: kb essolo@bessolo.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Worknet/ Coordinated Child CarPPOJECTVALUATION: $ 250, 000
STREET ADDRESS 1315 -Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL?
PARCEL NUMBER(S): ---- -__!?- --- --` --?--- -_._?.
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 2.09 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 91 , 093 sf
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pinellas County Parcel 15 2915 12276 005 0010 Broc
Terrace Revised Block 5, Lots 1-20
PROPOSED USE(S): Government Offices
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Adoptive re-use of existing 12,265 sf one story buildi
Specifically identify the request This is a request for approval of the existing setback
(include number of units or square -- - - - - --
footage ofnon-residential use and all of 17'-611 along Cleveland Street, 10' along Fredrica Av
requested code deviations;e.g. and Lady Mary Drive which were reviouSl a YOVed in
....
reduction in required number of .. ....... .... _ ....... ... .............. ............ _................. ..._ .P..... _......_...y _pp _...... _...............
parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 2004
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TRR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI?
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D.
?
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
The existing one story 12,265 sf building, 109 existing parking spaces &
landscape are harmonious with the scale of adjacent neighborhood. -
The bulk/coverage/density is actually less intensive than adjacent propel
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The proposed Government office use will not hinder or discourage develop
adjacent properties. In fact, the proposed office use will enhance the
adjacent properties much more than the current unoccupied building.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed office use will not adversely affect health or safety of
the neighborhood. It will in fact enhance the services provided to the
neig or oo roug or ne coor ina e L are.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The existing site contains 109 parking spaces far exceeding the propose
office use requirement of 50 spaces and has 3 access points to allow
smooth flow of traffic in and out of the property.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The existing building has been well maintained and is very consistent
with community character` through its one story scale and exterior
design with covered porte cochere entry.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
The existing property has enhanced landscaping with mature trees
providing desirable aesthetic appearance/screen for parking areas. The
o ice ours wi be norma business ours o am- pm, thereby no
.
ties
ent
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
? Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoningdistrict. The proposed Government office use would be impractical if it ha
to meet current front setbacks of 25' on 3 street sides. This would result
----------_-.----.__..__^.________.-------------.--.__-.._.___?__
in a reduction of 69 parking spaces as well as require the front porte
cochere to be reduced by 9' eliminating the existing 2 way covered drop of
area.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
The proposed Government office is a permitted use under the Commercial
Zoning and the Commercial General Land Use.
- _
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The existing building has had several business uses in the past without
impeding the surrounding properties. The Government office use will not
impede any development or improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
Adjoining properties will actually be enhanced by having the existing
empty building be occupied by two agencies providing neighborhood
services to the community.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or The proposed Gov'
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
office is a permitted use in this Commercial Zoning district and would b
economic contributor to the City's economic base by providing job assist
services to both employers looking for staff and the general public look'
_._..__._... -
.._......... _........ -...... _ ................. _.... .... _............ _....... _...... ........ _... .._......_._._._......__........._..................._._........_....._._.................... _............... _............... _..... _....... _._.._....... _._.._..........__._..__._._._._...._._..__..._......... _...................... _........
for,4ob lacementas well as ?provi-V em?lo ment opportunities for reside
6. Flexibili with r?gard to use, lot width, required setbac tteight and o -street arkm are justified traBed on demonstrated compliance Hn all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
The existing landscaping buffers consist of mature trees and hedges on
all sides screening parking areas. The existing building is set back 50'
from Cleveland Street and 85' from Lady Mary Drive and Fredrica Drive..
an
ace
ag
Ls.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
b If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stonnwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided. There are no modifications proposed for the exist
impervious area.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
b SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
EX TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; NA per Rick Albee.
* LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
•
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
v Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
J All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
?_ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
L/ and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
;j Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
-? number of required spaces;
/ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
c/ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
? REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11);
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
V All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
?L Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
........
...........
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information:
t/ All sides of all buildings
:? Dimensioned
/ Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
L,-"Materials
? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-BD1.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or If the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
.KJ? Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN 'THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of Its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
JZI Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must Initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
AUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swam to and subscribed before me this ,?? day of
?l S. , A.D. 20_LQ_ to me and/or by
c13?S?1P , who is p2M2nWL Known has
produced
as identification. M .................? :?,.,..,
.;umm# DD,
Signature of roperty owner or representative Notary public, " Expires 6/:
1
My commission expires: (_ 3 7013 '
`F .,,,?? o•` iodda Notary
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8
Inc
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
Nemishawn, Inc.
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1315 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL.
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Interior renovation to existing building proposed as office and request
for approval of existing setbacks.
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Kevin J. Bessolo, President - Bessolo Design Group, Inc.
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (11we), the and igne authori , hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
L.} J) Q J--t. • 541.`
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
?t S
day of
ate of Florida, on this
St
Before me the undersigned, an.offioer duly commissioned by the laws of the
a
<
, 2(?( D personally appeared f" ??RUL SkNK who having been first duly swom
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that, he/she signed.
rnnnw...........vnu.....u......uu...
DEBRA J. CURRY
pComm# 000895856
x° & 'f'1a
? Expires 6/3/2013 Notary P lic Signature
!
? OWF
.
Florida Notary Assn., Inc ? ,3?. 3
Ns1ary. `'?8tacyp ..........................: My Commission Expires:
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (F1.D) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8