FLD2010-08002; 2230 DREW ST; FLORIDA SPINE1
FLD2010-08002
2230 DREW ST
Date Received: 8/2/2010 11:56:58 AM
Florida Spine
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE:
ATLAS PAGE: 281A
PLANNER OF RECORD: S -K
PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
CDB Meeting Date: November 16, 2010
Case Numbers: FLD2010-08002
Agenda Item: C. 2.
Owner/Applicant: Florida Spine Properties, LLC
Representative: Gary Young, 2 Young Architects, Inc.
Addresses: 2230 Drew Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development Application to permit a building addition of
1,371 square feet to an existing medical clinic in the Office (O)
District with a lot area of 25,662 square feet, a lot width of 183 feet
(along Drew Street), a front (south) setback of 8.7 feet (to existing
pavement) and 16.75 feet (to existing building), a side (east) setback
of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 10 feet (to existing building),
a side (west) setback of five feet (to existing pavement) and 118.33
feet (to existing building), a rear (north) setback of seven feet (to
existing pavement) and 17 feet (to existing building), a building
height of 27 feet (to top of flat roof), and 32 parking spaces as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions
of Community Development Code Section 2-1004.B., with a
reduction to the south perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to 1.5
feet, a reduction to the north perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet
to seven feet, a reduction to the east perimeter landscape buffer from
five feet to zero feet, a reduction to the interior landscape
requirements from 10 percent to eight percent, to allow interior
landscape islands of less than 150 square feet and less than eight feet
in width from back of curb to back of curb and a reduction to the
foundation landscape requirement from five feet to zero feet as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
CURRENT ZONING: Office (O) District
CURRENT LAND USE Residential/Office General (R/OG)
PLAN CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Medical Clinic
Proposed Use: Medical Clinic
EXISTING North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
SURROUNDING Detached Dwellings
ZONING AND USES: South: Institutional (I) District
Place of Worship
East: Commercial (C) District
Medical Clinic
West: Commercial (C) District
Automobile Service Station
Community Development Board - November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 1 of 8
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.59 acre site is located on the north side of Drew Street approximately 330 feet east of the
intersection of Belcher Road and Drew Street. The existing 6,943 square foot, two-story structure,
occupying the site is currently vacant due to a major fire in April 2010. This structure is one of
three separate buildings that Florida Spine Institute operates. Florida Spine Institute has been in
business at the subject location since 1990.
To the west of the subject property is an automobile service station (7 Eleven). Detached
dwellings exist to the rear (north) of the subject site and to the east are related offices for the
Florida Spine Institute. Located in the Institutional (I) District across the street is Skycrest
Baptist Church and School.
Development Proposal:
On August 2, 2010, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application was submitted for the
subject property due to the existing setbacks not meeting Code provisions. The application
proposes to permit a second floor addition of 1,371 square feet to an existing medical clinic
within the existing footprint. The addition is designed to complement the existing structure and
break the visual impact of the building. The portion of the building with two-story walls is
punctured with a series of open fenestration which adds interest on the wall. The building will be
finished with stucco with white aluminum coping at the roof line. The structure will be 27 feet in
height to the top of the flat roof.
The off-street parking area will remain unchanged with the exception of the restriping of some
parking spaces, the relocation of the refuse dumpster and handicap accessibility modifications to
a walkway.
As there will be no modifications to the existing site improvements, there will be no impact upon
the I.S.R., minimum lot area/size, maximum building height and/or minimum setback
development standards with this proposal. The development proposal's compliance with the
applicable development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed
below.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) land use category and CDC Section 2-1001.1, the maximum allowable FAR is
0.50. The proposed medical clinic will have a FAR of 0.32.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the R/OG land use
category and CDC Section 2-1001.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.75. The proposed ISR is
0.72, which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area for a medical clinic use is 20,000 square feet. Pursuant to the
same Table, the minimum lot width is 100 feet. The lot size is 25,662 square feet and the lot
width along Drew Street is 183 feet, both of which are consistent with the Code provisions for
medical clinics.
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 2 of 8
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there are no minimum setbacks required for
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the front
setback for a medical clinic use ranges between 15 - 35 feet, the side setbacks range between 10
- 20 feet and the rear setback ranges between 10 - 20 feet. The existing setbacks include a front
(south) setback of 8.7 feet (to existing pavement) and 16.75 feet (to existing building), a side (east)
setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 10 feet (to existing building), a side (west) setback
of five feet (to existing pavement) and 118.33 feet (to existing building), a rear (north) setback of
seven feet (to existing pavement) and 17 feet (to existing building). While all of the existing
setbacks do not meet the criteria of CDC Section 2-1004; they are consistent with the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment provisions. As mentioned previously there will be no
modifications to the existing site improvements and the building addition is on the second floor
within the existing footprint, therefore there will be no impact to existing setbacks.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, there is no maximum height for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
maximum height for a medical clinic use can range from 30 - 50 feet. The height of the existing
building is 27 feet (to top of flat roof). The proposal is consistent with this Code provision.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1004, the minimum required parking for
a medical clinic is five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As such, 42
parking spaces are required. The site has 32 parking spaces. The applicant is currently leasing 10
parking spaces across the street at Skycrest Baptist Church. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-1404.A
all required off-street parking spaces shall be located within 600 feet of the principal use. In this
case the off-street parking spaces are located within approximately 100 feet of the medical clinic.
The applicant has agreed to provide a parking agreement, with the City as a party, with Skycrest
Baptist church for these parking spaces. The church currently has an excess of 41 spaces above
code requirements. Staff has found this proposal acceptable.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles.
Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize a refuse dumpster located at the southwestern corner of
the site. The dumpster will be screened from the right-of-way with a white PVC fence. The
proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Landscaping Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15-foot wide landscape
buffer along Drew Street, a five foot wide landscape buffer along both the western and eastern
property lines and a rear (north) landscape buffer width of 12 feet. As no parking lot
modifications are proposed or possible, the applicant has proposed to install additional
landscaping in the existing buffers. The existing landscaped buffer along Drew Street is only two
feet wide in some areas due to a walled retention pond. The applicant has proposed to install
some plant material in parts of the retention area to give the appearance of wider landscape
buffer along Drew Street. The western property line has the required five foot wide landscape
buffer while the eastern buffer is 10 feet wide with the exception of a patio on the property line
Community Development Board - November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 3 of 8
near the rear of the parcel. The proposal provides landscape material for the entire ten foot wide
area on the east property line. The existing rear (north) landscape buffer is seven feet wide and
contains five large oaks trees and a six foot high privacy fence.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation planting shall be provided for 100 percent of
the building fagade along a street right-of-way. A minimum five foot wide landscaped area shall
be provided along the front fagade facing Drew Street. Again, as no parking lot modifications
can take place and the building footprint is not changing, the applicant has requested a waiver to
the foundation landscape requirements.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the vehicular use area must contain
landscape islands a minimum of 150 square feet in size. While the existing site provides eight
percent of the vehicular use area with landscape islands, some are not 150 square feet in size or
eight feet wide from back of curb to back of curb.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed
on the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is
closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive I X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues.
Community Development Board - November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 4 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004:
Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.50 0.32 X
I.S.R. 0.75 0.72 X
Minimum Lot Area 20,000 square feet 25,662 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 183 feet X
Maximum Building Height 25 - 50 feet 27 feet (to top of flat roof) X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 15 - 35 feet South: 16.5 feet (to building) X
8.7 feet (to pavement)
Side: 10 - 20 feet East: 10 feet (to building) X
Zero feet (to pavement)
West: 118.3 feet (to building) X
5 feet (to pavement)
Rear: 10 - 20 feet North: 17 feet (to building) X
7 feet (to pavement)
Minimum Off-Street Parking 5 spaces/1,000 sf GFA 42 parking spaces X
(42 parking spaces)
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 5 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
1004.B. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and annronriate distances between buiddines.
Community Development Board - November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 6 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Coonsistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent Droperties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of October 7, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient
to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.59 acre site is located on the north side of Drew Street approximately 330 feet east
of the intersection of Belcher Road and Drew Street;
2. That the subject property is located within the Office (O) District and the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) Land Use Plan category;
3. That the property is presently used as a medical clinic;
4. The applicant, Florida Spine Care Properties, LLC, proposes to expand the medical clinic on
the subject property;
5. That the proposal has no impact upon the following development standards: I.S.R., minimum
lot area/size, setbacks and maximum building height, as they presently exist;
6. The proposal includes 32 parking spaces on site;
7. The proposal includes an off-site parking agreement with Skycrest Baptist Church for 10
parking spaces; and
8. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Table 2-1001.1 of the
Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
1004.B;
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 7 of 8
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
4. The development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 3-1202.G
of Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development Application to permit a building addition of 1,371 square feet to an
existing medical clinic in the Office (O) District with a lot area of 25,662 square feet, a lot width
of 183 feet (along Drew Street), a front (south) setback of 8.7 feet (to existing pavement) and
16.75 feet (to existing building), a side (east) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 10
feet (to existing building), a side (west) setback of five feet (to existing pavement) and 118.33
feet (to existing building), a rear (north) setback of seven feet (to existing pavement) and 17 feet
(to existing building), a building height of 27 feet (to top of flat roof), and 32 parking spaces as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 2-1004.B., with a reduction to the south perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to
1.5 feet, a reduction to the north perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to seven feet, a
reduction to the east perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, a reduction to the
interior landscape requirements from 10 percent to eight percent, to allow interior landscape
islands of less than 150 square feet and less than eight feet in width from back of curb to back of
curb and a reduction to the foundation landscape requirement from five feet to zero feet as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 3-1202.G., with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That, all landscaping be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy;
2. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the
buildings be painted the same color as the building;
3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an off-site parking agreement will
need to be entered into between the owners of the respective properties and the City, and be
recorded in the public records of Pinellas County;
4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the 10 leased parking spaces be
clearly identified as such on the Skycrest Baptist Church property;
5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the existing storage shed on the
parking lot be removed; and
6. That, all signage be permitted separately.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Q
A. cott Kurleman, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs
Community Development Board -November 16, 2010
FLD2010-08002 - Page 8 of 8
L
View of west side of subject building.
View of existing landscape buffer.
2230 Drew Street
Case Number FLD2010-08002
Page 1 of 1
L
View of south side of subject building.
View of existing interior landscaping.
;? -t_ ?'
314 a
09:' 'ro°. -. w','•'eN„• a• :ry.".N• •N,• •.ci,.. ".?:
•
.
A308308 :•
y
+
.
?, •'?d -M? ?. M'• ?"Ny• ??, •. "?
? ,°w .••°?o •-?° ? 2
. '30'1• •'b " '
.
.NN
250
. •. a•, ? ? N • .h ?. It.•. ' '• ?. . ,.tom •' ?'-. .^ • °^ •'rn •
•'N •• N
22
^ -
A
` N
N
N, •
?
• N" •
•
•'N •N•
•
'
/
?[
y
W
.M•
W
.. ..
.N'. •
4V• °.t
V
•°
N'
,
??
rl, • z2b
'
-N
- M ?
N
' 6 '
•
•
??
?
`y.
.
, .?
. N.
- .N
N. W `7'. ..N.'.
N.
'K . •N?.
?
9
222 MANY7R.;•
.
,
e
•
•
,
?° u°r
uhi •u?i- ?- .?. .?•: ."?. .
•?•??
N.•
.•,N? w•`•? w: ?
c°'v ? a.
N.•
-•<
N
••?• ??
?•+
?
N N'
'
?
•
L
N.
•N.
ry .4. .
_
. ?:,
•.
Y N, ?
;
V
.'
•? ° .?Y
205
? rn
? N
DT
DREW ST-
C °
N °p N N ?
N N N
O
' .. .....1'79•.
77
172
_
4
I 180 129
ZONING MAP
Owner: Florida Spine Properties, LLC Case: FLD2010-08002
Site: 2230 Drew Street Property Size: 0.59 Acres
PIN: 07-29-16-90126-004-0260 Atlas Page: 281 A
P .Ln1ET1 U a --......_ ' R -sts #r c tE 4 '
wi
-' °e y4 "6
t
?
?
t
E
t ?
"'
v a
Y
Cr.
t
,Ri1 N
GTON
OL
Ladem Way tom` r? a . ? ARTY R
Y
?`
Z
? •l"•- ? Y? ?
tiQ
ti, sr+ .. ? J &3F 2 1 ?.
P, C
jr
Z
ST MARILYN ST SHARKEY 0 SNtiRK?EY _ ^ _ ..
`-
2 ?° a ?r?• ?: PROJECT SITE
?..
_X. •
" .. . '?.
.L+ J0.... ?.?vL»..?.?
»
'?
_
.
.
.(
_ CR-528 DREW
Lct MI
z
W A°td
-
m Loll e.
c I
w x
Z d
z Q
ta45H
w
4
A'HTMAN ST ? z
LL'
Z o I 1
! HgtJGER ST r
u
aaeLLa _. }
SH E LL EY ST F
?
? N
E
Y
LOCATION MAP
owner: Florida Spine Properties, LLC Case: FLD2010-08002
Site: 2230 Drew Street Property Size: 0.59 Acres
PIN: 07-29-16-90126-004-0260 Atlas Page: 281 A
\ 314 ,N•+ .•M. .N,: .N '.N. .?. '. I'. ,;? N? N +•h ..I•
'
• 309
?
08 1 , 2 .8 .4..?, -8. 7 '8', •
9•- 10 -ih 1 1 '-I 13- '•14
?
•
' 34
33;? • 32 31 . 2k? 2 ' ?3 .• ?7 '24 ° °
01
:
T- 3
N
06270 250,
.. .. i--- -. , .
:?. -9010a.. -1 GGRANGER DR . .. .
•
,
,N
5•. N•?• '-N".N
•m'"' -'.1` "R'-".?••'
. "Y. N N'•' •?•' ;1-4-
' •N- NeW •N
217:
• K
•
N
N
'
N
'N
"
'
N
.
N
•
._ NN
.
`
. -
?
.
-
.
o
.10
'
'
M
n4?Y
,
.
'
•
'
•
ez ...
.?0.
,. ••130.
., '.-+
'
-`??N." any .? ?7• .•.?. .?•
. •• ^9ti 2 °; 34' - •o'?,''' ., ' ;.+
•
•
•
•
,
•
iV' • .?N.. . N N. •?+. .?,N?.. •N• .N .. N. •N- ;N
• ' N.
•
• N. tV .
'2Y1•. . ''1?
,. ^4s • ')?/• ry
'
'?' `
'
,
1
.tiA
? .•:
...:'
222 WOR11 AKDR
+ "
.
13
'
1
•;?.-.?,•,.,,
? •?-" ,ni•,? w:+
? tai ?
'4
.
1 z 0
I
205
P
1
24
O O Automob le 0 29 28 27 1 26 2s 23 22 18 17 16
I z1
1 Clinic
I zo 1$ 1
co N Service S atioo ? w
1
ee}}
N 50 50 1 N I M e
j 1 I N N 1 N
\ N N N N
I
N N
N I 1 N
DREW ST
DREW ST
a
h so
o
00
N
N N 50
Place of Worship N N
1,/07
7LU4
o f W 1.01 A c p zzvs
M
V) X
N
1.81 Ac(c)
.1
n o2 co
172 z
zams
2.86 Ac
„roa 180 129 7.5 A c (c)
za
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: Florida Spine Properties, LLC Case: FLD2010-08002
Site: 2230 Drew Street Property Size: 0.59 Acres
PIN: 07-29-16-90126-004-0260 Atlas Page: 281 A
Resume
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4553
scott.ku rleinanrmvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner III
• Planner II
August 2008 to present
June 2005 to August 2008
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual,
variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to
determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings.
Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City
officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and
presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings.
• Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with
City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to
ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing
condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of
Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to
monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree
permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical
tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on
public and private properties.
• Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 -1996
Groveland, FL
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and
private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers
regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees.
• Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company 1991 -1993
Clearwater, FL
Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance.
• Store Manager
William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 -1991
Cincinnati, OH
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for
teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment
maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared
for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
GRADUATE - Certificate: Communi Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA,
TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA.
Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management
AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414.
ti o 'Ir
'Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
CASE NUMBER:
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS: 7-7 --15( Die w
PHONE NUMBER: 7,77 7.2?/_ ,!576QZ FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: 72/ . z/8, _5Z,9Z EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): 5&:f/JP_
?- 1
List ALL owners on the deed Ir?"/,
AGENT NAME: =L'J47 - ( Q/
MAILING ADDRESS: 15-?z d/13 46&c4CE
PHONE NUMBER: 7_27, 2-/S M3?0 FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: W7. 70OOOq EMAIL:
t
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
Sew ee4 .
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
AA
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 1 of 2
,10 40-
City of Clearwater
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Florida Spine Institute
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: page 1 of 2
a. Our theme for the building addition is to refreshed and updated the design. We plan
on carrying that theme through the landscaping by maintaining the Oak canopy and
eliminating the mixture of random palm trees. The palm will be replaced by Cypress in
and around the retention ponds that currently are not addressed. Ground planting
replaces existing sweet viburnum to enhance and identify the entry area. Replacement of
existing plantings in the site triangle will enhance visibility during ingress/egress.
2. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: page 2 of 2
The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance
the community character of the City of Clearwater. Recommended Hibiscus will help tie
this site with other upgraded landscapes. Installing Cypress will enhance the current
retention ponds. Additional types of landscaping material will be utilized to give the
current landscape more variety.
3. PROPERTY VALUES: page 2 of 2
The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a
beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development. The landscape plan will responds to its topography by adding
Cypress to the retention area. The new plan responds to safe ingress/egress with low plant
material. The new plan introduces an accent flowing plants at the entrance. These
improvements combined with the repair of hedge material and the buffer fence will
enhance the overall property desirability. These improvement will be seen from the
public right of ways and from adjacent private land owners increasing their adjacent
desirability and therefore value.
V err- . V,
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
property
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN
Sw o a d subscribed before me this day of
A.D. 20 to me and/or by
who i personally kn wn has
ti ficati n.
4aj e r
public,
My commission expires: N p n ?`
N,?x"'vw Notary Public State of Florida
Kim Chamley Dunn
N- < My Commission DD975872
a a Expires 04/18/2014
C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms__ 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 2 of 2
V 1
Planning Department
ea100 Clrwater South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ! Zo'5"0`O
CASE #: ? Q0 to -0 %V V c
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: _FL ;e,
' `
MAILING ADDRESS: DjLO? sitf ,, rlPa /rZZ{
PHONE NUMBER: W2 'VG/ 54-02 FAX NUMBER=
CELL NUMBER ?-7. y15-, _3,?-V7- EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): 1:5 f?
List ALL owners on the deed Cf_ . .
AGENT NAME: YOU„!t? /?,CGIfrGT S ??1 G ??clZy Yoy?
MAILING ADDRESS: ?5 3z ?t?lS ?P/Ga? ?/?l? nJ S?Jf! TS?_ ?`
PHONE NUMBER: 9C/3, Dc? ?p FAX NUMBER: po
CELL NUMBER: 707. 709- DCVO 5/ EMAIL: 4F4ty; ae'Cs vim.
98
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: CIO -,I L PROJECT VALUATION: $
STREET ADDRESS 7 7- 3 Q 1:tr lea -o v, fL 3 5462 S
PARCEL NUMBER(S): D72 G Did Y - 60
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 159 PARCEL SIZE (square feet):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _ I-o T'5 -0 741.27 4.)d za., l x/c D,
PROPOSED USE(S):
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: ds ?
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
C:\Documents and Setting s\derek.ferguson\Desktop\pl anning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
V a.- z 'S
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR?A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO L,- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D.
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located. /
.52G CcG?,4e??. s?a ?? ?i r? /JflS
?
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
I#: 2006275131 BK: 15262 PG: 1768, 07/25/2006 at 12:43 PM, RECORDING 4 PAGES
$.,5?-5t) D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $17905.30 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUI3
This instrument was prepared by:
Gregg H. Fierman, Esq.
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
201 South Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 2200
Miami, Florida 33131
Folio #(s): 07/29/16/90126/004/0200 and
07/29/16/90126/004/0260
Grantee's FEI #:
I
1
- 1 1
_ - ? 1 1
1 ,.
1
WARRANTY DEED
THIS WARRANTY DEED made this o day,,9f July, 2006, between JES
PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation (the "Grantor"), wv4oge post office address is 3281
Landmark Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33761, and FLORIDA SPII?E'?ROPERTIES, LLC, a
Florida limited liability company (the "Grantee"), whose'p6st'o6ice address is 2250 Drew Street,
Clearwater, Florida 33765.
WJTNESS, T, 14:
THAT the Grantor, for and ih cbfisideration of the sum of TEN AND NO1100
DOLLARS ($10.00) and other ,,valudblt, toinsfde'rations, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, hereby grants, haigaiMj sells; .aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms
unto Grantee, all that certain,land sijuate iri P'inellas County, Florida, and more particularly
described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property").
THIS conveyance is suj ect to the following:
1. Taxes and a9essmbnts for the year 2006, and subsequent years.
2. All of the metiers set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof,
lhut tliis-shall n' of serve to reimpose same.
TOGET-HER; with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging
or in'ariywlse,appertaining.
TQOETHER, with all improvements now or in the future located on the Property, and
tog?ther,,';iih all of Grantor's right, title and interest, if any, in and to the streets, roads, and
alleys in-from of or adjacent to the Property.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the
Property in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the
Property; and that Grantor does hereby warrant the title to the Property and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
MIA 311397-2.066482.0010
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 15262 PG 1769
• 4- it
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Warranty Deed to be executed in ;
its name and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed by its proper officer thereunto duly
authorized, the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered JES PROPERTIES, INC., ;
i:n?the ?pres?of?-.., a Florida corporation
D
By:
.dent
[CORPORATE SEAL]
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)SS: ; -
COUNTY OF PINELLAS)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged\befoi'e'me this day of July, 2006, by
Douglas J. Weiland, as the President of JgS 1'R61'EifWg, INC., a Florida corporation, on
behalf of such entity. He is personally knovkri to me o has'produced
as identification. '
Ha(Vey,A. Ford
„?MY COMO 510N # DD123358 EXPIRES
-
? 2D07`
.*
? Print am :
NOTARY PUBLIC
,
• )UN
?
.
INC
gpOkDTHRUJROY FAIN i?'
State of Florida
I My Commission Expires:
,
-2-
MIA 311397-2.066482.0010
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 15262 PG 1770
x " v
EXHIBIT A ;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27 and 28, Block D of FIRST ADDITION T¢ TEMpI.xE
TERRACE, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 41, gage ?,,o the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
-3-
MIA 311397-2.066482.0010
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 15262 PG 1771
y l? y
EXHIBIT B
PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS
,
1. Restrictions, dedications, conditions, reservations, easements and other matters shoWti
the plat of FIRST ADDITION TO TEMPLE TERRACE, as recorded in,3Pdaf Book 41 "
Page(s) 9.
2. Agreement (Water Only) the City of Clearwater, Florida, filed February 19; _182, in
Official Records Book 5311, at Page 1022.
3. City of Clearwater Ordinance No. 3964-85, filed August 15, 1985, in_00cial Records
Book 6054, at Page 1883.
4. City of Clearwater Ordinance No. 4409-87, filed Septemb&r 4, 199$7, in Official Records
Book 6575, at Page 1564.
5. Distribution Easement granted to Florida Pbwer Ctr ration-, a Florida corporation, filed
June 20, 1990, in Official Records Book 7-397; at Page\ 657.
6. Declaration of Unity of Title, filed Wy 25, 199 , in Official Records Book 8283, at Page
844.
7. City of Clearwater OrdipaiiCe No. 5423-93, filed August 25, 1993, in Official Records
Book 8380, at Page 2215.\,',
8. All applicable zoillg and-building ordinances and land use regulations.
9. All boundary ihFroa6hfnent, and other facts and circumstances, that would be disclosed
on the fact of an A?'1iA'S?rvey of the Property.
Al T? I?OCUMEAITS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
- - COUNTY, FLORIDA.
-4-
MIA 311397-2.066482.0010
Commonwealth
Policy No.: FL0020-81-ST-09-4533-2009.8110709-77621489
LOAN POLICY OF-TITLE INSURANCE
Isketi' by
Commonwealth Land. Title Insurance Company
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIt7N8 FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM CDVERAGE•CONTAINEO IN SCHEDULE B Aklii E" DITiONS AND
STIPULATIONS, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation, herein called'the Company. insures; sniff Data iH Policy
.,shawn in'Schadule k against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of insurance stated In Schedule A, iustalnad or incurred by the Insug4ltJSGtpason of'.
1. Mile to the estate or Interest deseribod In Schsduls A being vested other than as stated therein;
2:* Any defect In or Ben or ancumbrancs an the tltfe,
3- Unmsrketabilkyof the tile:
4. Lack of a right of occeas to'end from the land,'
5, The Invalidity or unenforeeability of the lion of the Insured rrtgage upon the title;
B.. The priority of any Ben or encumbrance over the Ilan of the Insured mortgage;,' `
7 Lack of priority of the lion of the Insured mortgage over any statutory Ilan for services, tabor'or material: , y
(a) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which Is contracted for or commenced prior lo'Dats of Policy: or
(b) arising from an Ln*oveawl or work related to the land which Is contracted for or commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and winch Is financed in
whole Cr in part by proceeds of the Indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Data of Polley the Insured hat advanced at Is obligated to
advance;
a, 'The Invalidity or unenforcasbllity of any assignment of the Insured mortgage, provided the assignmeni to shown in Sc tWule Aar thi failure of The
assignment shown In Schedule A to vest Gib to Iho insured motlgags in the named Insured saslgnse free and clearof•all liens.
the Company will also pay the c ssta,•ettomaye fees and expenses incurred in defense of the Site or the lion of iota Insured martgiaga, as insured, but only to the
extent provided In fho Conditions and Stipulations.
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The fallowing maltars.sro expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company'wtil not pay lose or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses,
whidn arise by reason of;
t. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not'llriked to building and zoning taws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regutstir(g,
prohibiting or relating to (1) the occupancy, use, or onjayrrant of oho IArid; 01) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereatter
erected on the land; Oil) •a separation In ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land at any parcel of which the land Is or was a part: or
(iv) environmental protection, or the offset of any violation of these laws, ordinancasa governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of
lha enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or onwrobrance resulting from a violation or alleged vlofation affecting the land has been recorded
in the public records at !kite of Policy.
(b). Any governmentsi polka power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of (he exerclse this or a notice of a defect. lion or,
encumbrance resulting from a vkdation w allogad violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Data of Poilcy.
2. Rights of eminent domain uniest notce of the exercise thereof trans been recorded In the public retards at Date of Policy, but not axcluding from coverage
any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which, would be binding on the rights of* purchaser for value without kno+Madge,
.3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a). created, suffered; assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b)' not known to the Company, not recorded In the public records at Date of. Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to fie
'Company by the Insured clatrnant prtor to the date the Insured clalmint became on insured under this policy:
(c). resulting in no loss or damage lathe Insured dalmant;
(d), attaching or created sutiaequent to Date of Pat" (except to use extent that this policy Insures the priority of the Ibn of the Insured nwrtgago over any
statutory Non for seMpos, tabor ar material); or
(a) resulting in toss or damage which would riot have been sustained If the insured. claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. ,
4.. UrnonbrpeatrfNty of the lien of- the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured of Dote of Policy, br the inability or failure of any,
subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to complywlth applicable doing business laws of the state In which the land is situated.
5. Invalidity or untinforceablt(ty of the lien of the insured mortgage,w claim thereof, which erlses out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and . ,
is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-In4onding law. • - ' •
6. Any'ctatutory Ilan for services, labor or matsrlais (or the claim of prlorlty-of, any,statutory lion for services, labor or materials over the Lion of the insured
mortgage) oohing from eri Impra"rAent or work'ralatod to the land whL6h is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed
In whols,or In part by proceeds of the,lndebtedness secured by "Insured mortgage which at Dab of Policy the insured has advanced or ie obligated to
advance.
7. Any claim, which arises out of the tianaactioo creating the Interval of the mortgagss Insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of tederat,bankruptcy,,'
state Insolvency, or similar credltors' fights laws, that Is based on: '
(a) the iansaction creating the interest of the Insured moingagea being doomed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent traneter, or
(b) the subordinatlon of the interest of me Insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the docinae' of equitable subordination; or
(c) the transaction Creating the Interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential Transfer except whore the preferential transfer results from
the failure:
(i) to timaly record the Instrument of transisr, or
(it) ' of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or Non creditor,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the company has, caused this policy to be signed will the facsimile aionatilms Of its President and Secretary and seal as
required by its By. ws
COMM OXW EALTH LAN D TITL E INSUR AN CE C OMPA NY
Auihodzed Signatory
-Brian E. Longford, req."
FL0020 - ST-09-4533?EALJ
Summit Title 8c Financial Scrvices,lnc / xntvr "°"`"°
1715 W Cleveland St Y`"1e"e
Tampa °FL 33606 Tc1:(811) 258-3001 Fax:(813).251=1900
of 841D7D8 ALTA Loan Pollcy (10117192)
r 1191.258 -wilts Florida Modifications
Commonwealth
• W lAt1 tNM.Mt i.M+/I
Policy of Title Insurance
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number: 2755250 Policy Number; 8110709-77621489
Amount of Insurance: $2,337,500.00 Customer Reference: ST-09-4533
Date of Policy: The date shown below or the date of recording of the instruments referred to in Item 4,
whichever Is the later.
February 20, 2000 at 2:31 PM
1. Name of Insured
Mercantile Bank, a Division of Carolina First Bank, ISAOA
2. The estate or Interest In the land described herein and which Is covered'. by this policy Is:
Fee Simple
3. Title to the estate or Interest in the land is vested In:
Florida Spine Properties, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
4. The Insured mortgage and assignments, thereof, if any, are described as follows:
Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement from Florida Spine Properties, a
Florida limited liability company to Mercantile Bank, a Division of Carolina First Bank, In Official
Records Book 16502, page 2217, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, in the original
principal amount of $2,337,500.00.
5. The land referred to in this policy is described In the said instrument and Identified as follows:
See attached Exhibit A for legal description
Summit Title & Financial Services
1715 West Clevelan Str
Tampa, FL 33606
This policy Is Invalid unless a cover sheet and Schedule 5 are attached.
1992 ALTA Loan Poitcy w/FL modifications
Order No.. 2755254
Policy No.: 8110709-77621489
Exhibit A
Lots 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27 and 28, Block D of FIRST ADDITION TO TEMPLE TERRACE, according to the
map or plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 41, Page 9, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Order No.: 2755250
Policy No.: 8110709-77625489
Schedule B - Section I
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2008 and subsequent years,
2. Agreement (Water Only) with the City of Clearwater, Florida recorded February 19, 1982 In Official
Records Book 5311, Page 1022, as to Lot 26.
3. Distribution Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation recorded June 20, 1990 in Official Records
Book 7307, Page 657, as to Lots 20, 21, 22 and 23.
4, Declaration of Unity of Title recorded May 25, 1993 In Official Records Book 8283, Page 844, as to Lots
26, 27 and 28.
NOTE: All recording references In this commitment/policy shall refer to the Public Records of Pinellas
County Florida, unless otherwise noted.
NOTE: In accordance with Florida Statutes section 627.4131, please be advised that the insured
hereunder may present Inquiries, obtain Information about coverage, or receive assistance In resolving
complaints, by contacting the Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Regional Office, 2400
Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 210, Maitland, FL 32751. Telephone 877-947-5483.
END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION I
1992 ALTA Loan Policy w/FL modifications
Order No.: 2755250
Policy No.: 8114709-77621489
Schedule B - Section 11
In addition to the matters set forth In Part I of this Schedule, the title to the estate or Interest in the land
described or referred to In Schedule A is subject to the following matters, if any be shown, but the
Company Insures that such matters are subordinate to the Ilen or charge of the Insured mortgage upon
said estate or Interest.
1. Assignment of Contracts, Contract Rights, Deposits, Leases, Rents, and Revenues fled In D.R. Book
165072, Page 2242, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION 11
1992 ALTA Loan Policy w/FL modifications
Q9 Commonwealth
ENDORSEMENT
Attached to and made a part of Policy Number: 8110709-77621489
The Company insures the owner of the indebtedness secured by the Insured mortgage against loss
or damage sustained by reason of:
1. Any Incorrectness In the assurance that, at date of policy:
a. There are no covenants, conditions or restrictions under which the lien of the
mortgage referred to in Schedule A can be divested, subordinated or
extinguished, or its validity, priority or enforceability Impaired.
b. Unless expressly excepted In Schedule B:
i. There are no present violations on the land of any enforceable covenants,
conditions or restrictions nor do any existing Improvements on the land
violate building setback lines shown on a plat of subdivision recorded or
filed In the public records.
ii. Any instrument referred to in Schedule B as containing covenants,
conditions or restrictions on the land does not, in addition, (1) establish an
easement on the land; (11) provide a lien for liquidated damages; (111)
provide for a private charge or assessment; (iv) provide for an option to
purchase, a right of first refusal or the prior approval of a future purchaser
or occupant.
Ill. There is no encroachment of existing Improvements located on the land
onto adjoining land, nor any encroachment onto the land of existing
Improvements located on adjoining land,
Iv. There is no encroachment of existing Improvements located on the land
onto that portion of the land subject to any easement excepted In
Schedule B.
v. There are no notices of violation of covenants, conditions and restrictions
relating to environmental protection recorded or flied In the public records.
2. Any future violation on the land of any existing covenants, conditions or restrictions
occurring prior to the acquisition of title to the estate or Interest in the land, provided
the violation results In:
a. Impairment or loss of the lien of the insured mortgage; or
b. Loss of title to the estate or Interest in the land if the Insured shall acquire title in
satisfaction of the Indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage.
3. Damage to existing Improvements (excluding lawns, shrubbery or trees)
a. Which are located on or encroach upon that portion of the land' subject to any
easement excepted in Schedule B, which damage results from the exercise of the
right to maintain the easement for the purpose for which it was granted or
reserved.
b, Which results from the future exercise of any right to use the surface of the land
for the extraction or development of minerals excepted from the description of
the land or excepted In Schedule B,
4. Any final court order or judgment requiring the removal from any land adjoining the land
of any encroachment excepted in Schedule B.
5. Any final court order or judgment denying the right to maintain any existing
improvement to the land because of any violation of covenants, conditions or restrictions
or building setback lines shown on a plat or subdivision recorded or filed in the Public
Records.
Wherever In this endorsement the words "covenants, conditions or restrictions" appear, they shall
not be deemed to refer to or include the terms, covenants, conditions or limitations contained in an
Instrument creating a lease.
Endorsement Form 9
._C...._..k'A , ...
{•?? Commonwealth
u+r mar aww.r nww.
As used In paragraphs 1(b)(1) and 5, the phrase "covenants, conditions or restrictions" shall not be
deemed to, refer to or Include the terms, covenants conditions or restrictions relating to
environmental protection. This endorsement Is made a part of the policy and Is subject to all of the
terms and provisions thereof and any prior endorsements thereto.
Except to the extent expressly stated, It neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the
policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any prior
endorsements, nor does it Increase the face amount thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this endorsement to be Issued and valid when
signed by an authorized fficer or 11CPAsed agent of the Company.
Authorized Offic or Licensed Argent
S 1.< 1
City of Clearwater
Flexible Development Application
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project: Florida Spine Institute
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIRMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) page 2 of 8
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
This project will not create any detrimental impact or any reduction in existing green
space. Mature trees will be maintained. No increase to storm water run-off will be
created. The building's massing is designed to be compatible with the adjacent buildings,
as the existing two story structure will be maintained as a two-story structure. The
building's fagade design is being refreshed and updated, but will be compatible with
adjacent building design in material and color choices to blend with it's neighbors.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development
and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
This building expansion / second floor addition is within the building footprint and
therefore will not create any visual impediments to adjacent properties. The building
facade design is being refreshed which will increase the property value.
I The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The building improvement will create a covered shaded walkway from the existing
parking lot to the existing building front door and adjacent facilities, thereby improving
the safety and comfort of the building occupants.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
This building improvement does not change existing traffic pattern to the existing
property, nor does it require any parking lot work.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
This development is an enhancement of an existing building on an existing parcel, which
has adjacent retail and office business properties. This development will continue its
current office use. The architectural design will enhance the building's character while
remaining complimentary to its neighbors.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
This development is an enhancement of an existing office building which will not change
in use or operation hours. There are no changes to any acoustics, visual or olfactory items
so there will be no adverse affects form the project.
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
1 4'. T
City of Clearwater
Flexible Development Application
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project: Florida Spine Institute
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIRMENTS: page 3 of 8
(Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/ or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
The existing conditions of the existing building do not meet the current development
standards of setbacks. There is no other available floor area space within the property to
create additional building usable square footage without imposing on any existing
parking or further encroaching upon setbacks.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning
objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district.
This proposed enhancement is in keeping with current existing Zoning, as it does not
change the current Office Use which meets the current zoning.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The footprint of the existing building and existing site conditions do not change at all
with this enhancement, thereby not creating any obstacles for adjacent properties to do
their own future improvements.
4. Adjoining properties will not stiffer detriment as a result of the proposed development.
The proposed development is merely an enhancement to an existing building. There are
no planned objectionable building pieces which would create any abnormal property use
or any devaluaton of the neighborhood, as the use is not changing.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential
use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or
more of the (following) objectives.
a. This proposed building enhancement is compatible with adjacent land uses and future
uses. This proposed enhancement is in keeping with current existing Zoning, as it does
not change the current Office Use which meets the current zoning.
c. The facility is currently not under utilization due to recent fire damage. The
erd-iancement will provide an improved structure, create construction jobs, and will allow
the community to allow the recently unemployed staff to return tot heir gainful
employment within the building.
%. t
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the (following) design
objectives.
a. The footprint of the existing building and existing site conditions do not change at all
with this enhancement, thereby not creating any obstacles for adjacent properties to do
their own future improvements.
b. Our project enhancement meets applicable City design guidelines for aesthetic and
Code needs , through the use of fenestration and covered walkways and exterior stucco
wall material. The massing of the two story space has improved visual breaks and interest
with the open fenestration pattern. The existing building color and fagade materials are
being maintained for continuity. There are no exterior soffits or sloped roofs in the
enhancement. Wall mounted exterior building signage will be redesigned for size to meet
sign code.
c. The current streetscape is composed of one and two story structures of varied styles
and sizes. This proposed building addition is one of three structures composing the
current `Florida Spine Institute' business. The design elements of windows, colors and
walkway canopy are pulled from the two other adjacent buildings to create an updated
design that could become a guide for future renovations.
d. The proposed design is subdivided into two elements to break down the visual impact
of the building. The portion of the building with two story walls is punctured with a
series of `open fenestration` which add interest on the wall , and provide shaded cooling
and secure visible openness to the walkways behind which direct pedestrians from
parking to building entry. This distinct new vertical element contrasts with the other
portion of the more horizontal street elevation style, providing variety in the roof in
contrast to adjacent sloped mansard elements. Locating the vertical element on the corner
of the facade for the project design creates subtle visual interest with changes in the
horizontal planes of the building.
e. The proposed enhancement does not alter distance between existing buildings. Existing
residential fence and landscape buffers will be repaired Existing mature landscape tree
specimens are remaining. Landscape at the property site entry is being improved with the
addition of plants for aesthetic appeal, as well as removal of obstructions within the
visual triangle for code compliance.
2 k, f
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
Wl' A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
,,ice If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees;
TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; rr ?pF?v1 _1-7- 4ye.?-r
r1? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
11.2- GRADING PLAN, as applicable; .5)001 'i ,5,p
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documents and Setting s\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
S v t
E. STORMWATER NARRATIVE page 4 of 8
The existing property site impervious area and stormwater systems will not be
changed. Nothing in the proposed addition will affect stormwater runoff or collection,
because the proposed new roof area equals the existing roof area, and will drain to the
same existing retention pond in an unaltered path. The existing finished floor remains the
same with the minor additional floor area matching the finished second floor height.
y a [
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
_ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
_ and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
_ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011;
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED \
Land area in square feet and acres; Z-S 166?- Z151 G
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
L,--Gross floor area devoted to each use; ( C) y? 93?LJ
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the 3?
? number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, / /
_? expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 7? . 77
?Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. .7-7
. 3
-? REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 '/? X 11);
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
i
{E{?
5P
s r,
3$
SITE DATA TABLE
FT rs. nbb] so Fors.
=56?] so
A«, KRES?
IT I,
IT Fr
...,. _.. _.- ?. emu. __.. .. ??-_-
ADJACENT PARKIN6 AGREEMENT
-
rI
2 AREA MAP
Nrs
-, t D
I _ I ?J1 I
1 _I
E+?STNOwaraEES Fl 1 `/
SEE LSC a 5
:t
RAR ?,?
?EL. 'Y eA Srw •u,luRe
I.
.EW Dv 1? E
SEE LAnDSC T
2? ? EwSr na _
rh~t]bY RAR vutc,+s EwL ?-- -
D I \ 1 . i !/ RECLACE 5FE I! ?? ? - ? ?? ?-0- - - F Imo- _
Ax
vAV:NS ? ?ArD
of ?n m. wa• Iro
FLA.1 - -o s o d 2 b?
I J-
=ER
I!
a?HAHDR. ERr?? -' k j // ? a ,ER L 1a `
SEE S ?Er A] D - L l..St DIRa
DR Ili // __„E e.lo,eo.r
II
envoi a oo.°ow
II ?? All
I,- IT a
A Ir I(_ / I
? ? b ? I?,? i??l? ?Aaa ssrEH PERFK
g4Vr:5
?_ ? ? I ?srAT a. c..-
.__ '4 s I 1? lam/ osi++;\?
W +
+ ? ? lXISr„„,.? SrD.. aILDNa
i cA1nw 0.-ERw,.c? W ? zoNlNe Reauesrs
I SirE Rote rv5 REa,GilOx
I= ?=ZTI"I-1021Z 117= T1 I-IT
I SITE PLAN ?
A 1.
o 1o m x
PHASE 1
2230 Drew St
Clearwater,FL 34698
NOTE: THIS PROJECT 15 BEING ISSUED IN TWO
PHASES. THE FIRST PHASE IS REPAIR OF EXI5TIN6
SPACE PHASE 2 WILL CONSIST OF AN ADDITION
WHICH IS CURRENLY UNDER A FLEXIBLE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. PHASE 2 DRAWINGS WILL
BE ISSUED AFTER FELA15LE DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL.
1 2 PHASED SHEET INDEX
c1? Ar0 Di.- c
-1 11.T.E AT I IOUNDITION -N
2 :,ITT 11=1 I-.
IEII?Nl I-
I P_
A' I A. a A..2 WALL SE. tIgN:. oEiAl s
Mt.1 p FLOOR HIAC RAN
M20 MCM
121 1111=22?t IDUMVII N.-
E 2 0 <HEDUEESCe RISERS UN
P10 %"B
I?
Rogal SPA
CODEDATA
fMAS! 1
MAX 2
M GROVE: B
COMSrR. R- 5 DlRORORD
„KC a NDT Sf%INCLlRGD - - - -- ' -
ADSflCDI]5 a?.n..w wro e.a
lxfOYw! 0
fL0OD 201! A :wea.um:.a:
Itiualn lK Unes e1uLe'?e iewue 2 Young
NRRIOR f??5 .•
ZONINGO ooe
a2LD5I51e?aKr U-W. ,., Architects
BUILDING DATA `
b fLCOR M] f-W PbE (bGA)
Re 1LOOIG 5902 faR055/ 291r (WA)
ADDI - 911 faRdli T. (WA)
mni lerl ARlA R9H faROY51 D9H I-Al 92 f .
PARKING .n.m .m ..e. -
I- ARN 01 6,Sa. 1. 12 XK!5 A] IROVIOlDI - h ^'
AOgTIO1ML U YK6 FlIpI M 5T A6 111 1512 0,A, III
SITE DATAo i en..,. fawroa' - - Tap-50n p
SIR lRMID15 ARCA . M" W. It D2V Fond. 3E
51M ARG . 2lN2 50. f1.125 RMkJ15.1
Florida
Spine
Institute
Renovation & Addition
$ ®; i +
a
ea 21.q
re RG- ? Q
C1.0
f 4 t
13'-4' 1 +-
Tkkkl
< 2 3 4 5 6 , 8 1 9 IO
rv 54',0' 5 tr 54'1 O" I T O
U q 1 I ? 1
I I
RETENTION
AREA
EXISTING TREES ( P) I _ / EXISTING
SEE LANDSCAPE ?` aEw ISLAND 88 5TORAGE
I FN?ErluHS.? E
PLAN Xroe)E6 iEOCw?reon??oro 50 FT SHED TO BE
REMOVED
POND ?{Ly
EL. ll. T CXISTIN6 PARKINS p
L- EXISTING RETENTION EXISTING TREES TO
\ AREA RETAINING WALL / EXISTING 6 ) 1
BE REMOVED (TYP) FT BOARD
WITH WARD RAILING SEE LANDSCAPE EXISTING ON 50ARD
TO. i PLAN (9X16)
EL. ,2b?-III /? PARKING FENCE
STRIPING
111 REPLACE AND \ 1
EX15TI15 5161. BVMPER5
®? o WITH NEW. SEE I
EXISTING LANDSCAPE 11 A2.0 90}O'
TO BE REMOVED
(TYP) SEE EX15TINO LIGHT
LANDSCAPE PLAN - -? ` \ POLE
?O I9 18 Il Ib 15 I4 13 12 II
I
LAND H
50
J FT
EXISTING
F CONCRETE
Q, PAVING
L 1.1 sxlEwEO •o T=T w_ rwE ro I
a ?
EX15TINO TREES TO
BE REMOVED (TYP) 12'-0" 5'-0" 12'-0` w
.- i
SEE LANDSCAPE ?\ I O
PLAN I ISLAND BB I N
rvE ^°°ITI°"_ex eu?i w 50 FT < _ w
I 1
rl' 65-O` 5 54' O"'
3?31 30 29 2B 226 25 ? -
N EH WALL TO REPLACE EXISTING 1' PVC
IIYII L WATER LINE
EXISTING RETENTION AREA - O
RETAINING WALL 5) 0 ® / / / ?I, a -,I
NEW MOIVIMENT SIGN I / - ?I _,
SEE SHEET A20 G%ISTINS ]STORY BUILDING ul Y ,
B,IOI 50 PT ;
I 1J TENTION ! ' ®r 1
A EA I NEW SECOND STORY
V BVI LOINS ADDITION Q
fl' FIRST FL SLAB
EXISTING RETENTI N REA-i ?" I _ I,l]O SO PT EL. l3.l l' T Lj
RETAINING WALL ITH1
FOUNDATIONx POND BOT J, / /' ?_
w I,',{ EL
F I4 /?I/ o ?
INSTALL 5IGNAGE i0 IDENTIFY '
W I IY THAT THIS BUILDING HAS BEEN
III / D HITH I
C ?.
TRU55 ROOF SYSTEM PER FAT
p I6-B` 1 G ?'?NTRV /'
T.O.W NEW WALKWAY 69A60
II¦-
EL ,25`r I' CANOPY COLUMN51 . EXISTING OVERHEAD
EL POWER LINE
I
r
EXISTING WALKWAY
CANTILEVERED OVER
RETENTION AREA
_ I P
L? ( LIFT 5TATIOI4:'
1O Q - _^ _ ??/? -EXISTING 6 PVC SAN 0 PROPERTY LINE L TURF BLOCK
-L4
-b
h J I?
EXISTING 2" FORCED -I - - 1.. - - - - - -
MAIN SAN. > PHASE 2 EPHASE I
y 0
T I ? i
N J u GROUND
w 4 i EXISTINS ONG STORY BUILDINS TRANSFORMER`
EXISTING WALKWAY •.. w?
CANOPY OVERHANG, ZONING REQUESTS 51 TE PLAN
=IO O NORTH
I. TOTAL ON SITE PARKINS REDUCTION
2. 51PEYARP SETBACK OF JO'-O' 51TE INFORMATION FROM SURVEY BY GEORGE
• EXISTING WALKWAY 3. REARYARD SETBACK OF IT'-O` A. 5HIMP II AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
CANOPY COLUMNS 4. FIR NTYARD SETBACK OF IB'-O' DATED 6.24.2010
5. REDUCTION OF LOADING SPAGE
6. PARKING SETBACKS
LEGAL DE5GRIPTION: LOTS 261,21 AND 28, BLOCK D, FIR5T ADDITION TO ,. INTERIOR LANSCAPE
'AF
TEMPLE TERRACE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT 8. LAN051- . BUFFER 0 10 20 30
BOOK 41, PAGE 9, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
< t
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
1,," All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
? Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
V Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
_? schedule;
/ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
Vf existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
_ percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
V--Irrigation notes.
NY REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 YzX 11);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information:
r-' All sides of all buildings
? Dimensioned
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
,c:, REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS-same as above to scale on 8 %X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Setting s\derek.ferg uson\Desktop\pla nning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
gs r
C
GENERAL LONST TON NOTES
PLANT SCHEDULE
o 5 M?'
-E ?. Fa?? K sa
um-
IT.
D,E a a. K
ma a? ..u 1
0
.c oac + ? +Ne
601
a
®E .K
?E
q
os, eN.?a - C
1
Ib'
or g ?O o o + #. ,
? z„e ,a?.aue o.K o.: o..z ';. I •'
lceN:.es?oeNOes
ex?s.?Na, ..,K?Ne
?.,osc.? e? ?? 1 aor ex?a
cr° g
_1Lrwa
zsz' IJ >
+.
is
o o ?K,o
soE.?= `? T ? log ® i
-a- L
a -T
l LANDSCAPE PLAN \\ u
2 Young
Architects
1532 OM, R-I
TaTm Spdra
Florida N
Florida
Spine
Institute
22M 0- Y
C6-,Fk" 316
Renovation
Addition
.a e.na
?o
C1.1
4
® PINE PINE 16, AOJAGENT 9/ 1 12'
16 PINE PINE
OAK OAK f
_ (? O O O C O ? ?_; % p
(20) 6 IR
I' GYP LYP l?J i I '' I REPLACE MISSING OR
DAMAGED HEDGE
- 9'
RETENTION OAK L_-- --
It"
AREA r
5
i
TRIM TREES TO ALLOW
13" FOR DUMP5TER SERVICE
OAK I
I ? OAK
1 I EXISTING CONCRETE
i PARKING LOT
14 Ex15T1NG CYPRESS
AIR
IL) S-O' I O ! SV 'I? TALL FENCE. DAMAGED
SLATS
r:
NEW MONUMENT 516N (H) HAW
20 50 FT/ FACE _ I
516N \ el I 01
0
-. (61 GLIR I ?O
t
® Aw
.. .-?_ OK
A
SITE TRIANGLE 14" 14 J I',
OAK OAK OAK
w ADJAGCNT RESIDENCES
I a
2 -0' CXI5TIN6 PARKIN6
LANDSCAPE BUFFER_?_
5V
(20) GLIR
--- . , -- I ?-? I
24 +
OA T
GM REE
??)G) (20) LIR I 1?
(16) 6LI J UNDER TREES 7
SV TREE
cM I
TREE
y?r? )?? ..scH H
b-
TREE
6,«1B cYP /?
C?EN,T
1
AKEXITING ]STORY BUILDING
-O 6.109 50 PT ®
RETENTION I 1 S.
AREA u ' T TREE
III????JJJJ 5C
p 10
O
' OAK
Fr?
p _ E115TIN PEA 51AVEL
NEw 48' WIDE I ?? I WALK
..JJJ EXISTING LARGE V
t
CONCRETE LYP I / SGHEFFALERA PLANTSNTS+ . TRIM M BALK TO
SIDEWALK
S DEWALK AND 24'.
CONNECTING STREET LYP FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF NEW (GM)
GYP OAK
COVERED WALKWAY 11° .?.. .. - ..
WIONTH
RET GUARDENTION RAILIDE Il I?:I _I _. _ (J7[q ?H ?1 d 4M'-
TO MATCH Ex1snNG PALM
LM SGH ../
'
LINGS __,. _.-..
RAI GM
10 O ?\? 101 GLIR (6) PM PROPERTY LINE •? \/1_yl ?\
POWER POLE PALM K f
III + i UNDER TREES EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING /
12' _ ADJAGCNT FLORIDA SPINE CENTER BUILDING E%I5
TIN6 CONCRETE Y
11 PALM PALM I jl w PATIO
%p
W
u
? LANDSG??PC PL?P?N NOR H
PAINT STUCCO I PAINT NEW STUCCO TO MATCH
WALLS: WHITE 1 EXISTING COLOR: MEDIUM GRAY
STUCCO FINISH 3
A41
FLORIDA PINE INSTITUTE
NEW 70 50 FT 516N
CEILING I ---
I ,
ma'y'' ? I::r \
e
M
t't'l
;A -FLOOR
r
EXISTING GUARD /
;r GROUND FACED BLOCK RAILING
BETWEEEN OPENINGS /
AND AT SILL
NEW SIGNAGE APPLIED
DIMENSIONAL LETTER. MAXIMUM
SIZE TO ENCOMPASS 20 50 FT.
0
h
A41 WHITE VINYL FRAMED WINDOWS
WTIH GRAY TINT. IMPACT
RE515TANT
STUCCO WINDOW SURROUND
?- PROJECTION. COLOR: WHITE TO
MATCH WINDOW FRAMES
EXISTING ADJACENT
ROOF
B O
0
NEW ALUMINUM COVERED WALK
\ CANOPY COLOR: WHITE
I. EXISTING METAL
CANOPY
i _ --------- - I - -
NEW COVERED WALK /
COLUMNS IN FRONT OF ffffffibY?4Y4Y
RAILING
i SOUTH STREET ELEVATION
PAINT NEW STUCCO TO MATCH PAINT STUCCO
EXISTING COLOR, MEDIUM GRAY WALLS: WHITE
ROOF LINE BEHIND WALL
EXISTING NEW
BUILDING ADDITION
REPLACE EXISTING REPLACE EXI5TIN6 _ STUCCO FINISH: PAINTED
LIGHT FIXTURE WITH GNA6E WITH NEW SIZE WHITE 4
SHIELDED FIXTURE WITH AND 0155161,1 THAT IS \ t A41
40 DEGREE CUTOFF COMPLIMENTARY TO - WHITE ALUMINUM COPIN G
\ BUILDING
5TIN6 FIBERGLASS 3
3 SHINGLES
[El
STING STUCCO FINISH
IFLJI:IDA SI'1NE 1fJSl?IU-
L 50 50 FT SIGN _
NEW 20 50 FT 516"
CEILING FLORIDA SPINS INS ITUTE
FLOOR
?I ?I I I - ?j? ??Tf
i I'i iI II, I i
SMOOTH WOOD PROJECTED
ROOF SHADE. PAINT: GRAY
- t .
WHITE VIANYL FRAMED WINDOWS
y` "• j M(fIH GRY TINT. IMPACT
R?SISTANT
i)ryIN• ? 1
METAL CANOPY
~fyl .1'
r= _ E LI
I
305
rd- p
r -
' GROUND FACED BLOCK
M BETWEEEN OPENINGS
' AND AT SILL
PHASE I PHASE 2
\ '!? %?.?£_?i'•.?•ii? T.ri?•i':t F 11
11
'
;
` , , ,
.
. .
.
GRR
MONUMENT SIGN TO MATCH
/
BUILDING
SLOTS IN WALL TO
OPEN WALKWAY BEHINE?
WEST PARKING ELE?(ATION
2
E%ISTIN FIBERGLA55 3
TAB SH-LE5
EX15TINC SiUGGO FIU15H
IIU
I
El
J.t
t
EAST ELEVATION
v< • r-o.
NORTH REAR ELEVATION
va•=11-O•
EXISTING ELEOTRIOAL EXISTING /
GEAR OOMPRE55OR5
1 ?`
-a'
i.. ?:u...:.:. ?.:..
t,
that,
pis
? 1
-4 1 0,K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
A Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
of
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE4 S
Swor o a d subscribed before me this; day of
L L, , , A.D. 20 l? to me and/or by
who is personally known has
p ced r_ 1 I l \
as identifi ati
c LC,?"?C?
Notary public, {{
My commission expires: !? 1 0$ j 2? i t q
y "9#Notary Public State of Florida
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Inf Pro(FLGfi2CYAbaONoyDtloa
Page 7 of 8 '1 o` MY Commission DD975872
of Fti Expires 04/18/2014
k "
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
5
?S?rtF_- ? ? ?t rat ??c?o-??C.?is?l?c. -
2. of
That (I am/we are) the downer(s) and record title holder(s)
the following described property (address or general location):
/
'
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Q
d.Ls
r I G DLt / /G! ?G eWcr v n?
, ?c
????d Gw
/
/
/
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
7- Y4 a
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
, _ personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public Signature
Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires:
C:\Documents and Setting s\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
*-Ly-t-.COXe.--7Iro DC- 6m) LLG
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
- -- z 1,5C) --l v_ao-'6 ------------- --- -- ----- -- -----------
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6.
7
That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
That (1/we), the undg(rsind/authority, hereby certify that the fore
f'
TATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned AAby--the laws of the State of Florida, on this -'Aq day of
personally appeared A5?' m T Na nm-F ! ! 4 r_C_- 1---C Ovho havin been first duly sworn
-- - `TO f YC 5 SC ott ?2 j Cpr1S ?Q Y1 v, UCh k1S
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. 1_+ LA tS
6q Lxlfo 0-
,,01 Oysn Notary Public State of Florida
Kim Charnley Dunn ??/? n 1^ u
My Commission DD975872 ?f?-y-1--`''?- ` ° "" -
o"`off Expires 04/1812014 Notary Public Signature
Notary Sea a My Commission Expires: I - u-LL4 _---
C:\Documents and Setting s\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FI-D) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8