Loading...
FLS2006-040230 s Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 X SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION X SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ N/A * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04/28/2006) LP i 0 ?i \N PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST 319 SOUTH GARDEN AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33756 727/639-7587 CELL NUMBER: 727/639-7587 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST JAMES BOND 319 SOUTH GARDEN AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33756 727/467-5000 FAX NUMBER: 727/445-7277 727/638-9088 E-MAIL ADDRESS: flblidesigners@scientology.net 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: FLAG BUILDING PROJECT VALUATION: S 45.OM(FB) STREET ADDRESS 215 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE PARCEL NUMBER(S): SEE ATTACHED LIST OF PARCEL NUMBERS PARCEL SIZE (acres): 2.13 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 921640 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON ATTACHED SURVEYS OR SHEET CIA PROPOSED USE(S): MINISTERIAL TRAINING AND PASTORAL COUNSELING DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: REQUEST SITE PLAN APPROVAL, INCLUDING COMPLETION OF Specifically identify the request EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION, LANDSCAPE, STREETSCAPE_,_ _ (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all LIGHTING, DRAINAGE & UTILITIES. requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of paridng spaces, specific use, etc.) CASE #- RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: C1 ersona112o08 =G Rag 81dgl3rd Subrn ttW%29Sep05-Re.dble Standard Demlopment (FLS) 3006.doc Paget of 7 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES-X- NO_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) X SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) X Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE ATTACHMENT A 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHMENT A 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. SEE ATTACHMENT A 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. SEE ATTACHMENT A 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SEE ATTACHMENT A 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SEE ATTACHMENT A ORIGINAL ___ PLANNING ,:., CITY OF CLEARWAIER CAPersonalt200610610 Flag BIdg128July06-DRC Submittall\28July06-Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 2 of 7 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) X Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: SEE ATTACHMENT A E. STORMWATER PLAN Manual and 4-202.A.21) of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria X A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. X COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required priorto issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) X SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisr, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees', X LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; X GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ORIGINAL ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RECEIVED CAPersonal120D610610 Rag BIdg128JulyMDRC SubmittalK28July06-Flexible Standard Development (R-S) 2006.doc Page 3 of7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) X SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; X North arrow; X Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; X All dimensions; X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; X Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; X All existing and proposed points of access; _X All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; X Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; X Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; X All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; - Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; X Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; X Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _X _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. X SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED SEE SHEET C1.1 SEE SHEET SEE SHEET Land area in square feet and acres; C1.1 C1.1 _- Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. X REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); X FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: X One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; X Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; X All open space areas; ORIGINAL _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; RECEIVED X Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); JUL I 2 8 2006 X' Streets and drives (dimensioned); X Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT X Structural overhangs; CITY OF CLEARWATER CAPersona112006t0610Fiag Bldg\28July06-DRC SubmigalhMuly06-Flemble Standard Development (R-S) 2006.doc Page 4 of 7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 2r x 36"): X All existing and proposed structures; X Names of abutting streets; X Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; X Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; X Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); X Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; ?X Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; X Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _ percentage covered; TX _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); X Irrigation notes. X REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) X BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: X All sides of all buildings; X Dimensions; X Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and X Materials. X REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 %2 X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. X All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 CAPersona112 0 0 610 61 0 Flag Bldg128July06DRC SubmiltaffQWulyWRexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 5of7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) JUL 28 2006 L3 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTNE CITY OF CLEARWATE ¦ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. X Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. X Aclvrowled ment of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. .Ioel Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this 2 7- day of A.D. 20_D?6 to me and/or by U 1 i I u62who is personally known has produced as identification. /1 Notary public. /111 •pencer Lowrey My commission a ires: * Pal" -ftumnmift "o-US-764 CAPersona11200610610 Flag B1dg126July06-DRC Submdall128July06-Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 6 of 7 ! • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 215 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (FLAG BUILDING) 645 FRANKLIN STREET (PARKING GARAGE) ?,- 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) MINISTERIAL TRAINING AND PASTORAL COUNSELING & PARKING 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ULI HUBER, JAMES BOND ED ARMSTRONG as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Pro wrier Property Owner Property Owner - Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of 1 personally appeared a ? t?H-Q-6{ ? who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ------------- ' •,, Spencer Lowrey e Commission 0 DD371469 fee • Expires February 6, 2009 • •` ft' r*d TM F.N • lmutarcs, W4 M38f7019 _ otary Public gnature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT QXPersonalt20 0 610 61 0 Flag BldgX26July06-DRC SubmittaIR28July06-Flexible Standard Development (R-S) 2006.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 7 of 7 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST FLAG BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE PART B: PARCEL NUMBERS FLAG BUILDING: 16/29/15/94896/000/0010 PARKING GARAGE: 15/29/15/54450/012/0020 15129/15/54450/012/0030 (LOTS 3-7) 15/29/15/54450/012/0080 16/291'15/18648/012/0130 (LOT 15) STORMWATER FACILITY: 16/29/15/18648/012/0130 (LOTS 13 & 14) VACATED ALLEYS O.R. Bk 5223 Pg 1487 O.R. Bk 6663 Pg 202 O.R. Bk 11746 Pg 598 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ATTACHMENT A FLEXIBLE STANDARD APPLICATION ORIGINAL RECEIVED FLAG BUILDING JUL 2 8 2006 215 SOUTH FT. HARRISON AVENUE PLANNING DEPAR-rMENT and CITY OF CLEARWATER PARKING GARAGE 645 FRANKLIN STREET The purpose of this request is to re-approve the Church of Scientology's Flag Building and Parking Garage in downtown Clearwater. The Flag Building and its related facilities were approved through the Certified Site Plan process under the previous Zoning Code. The Certified Site Plan (CSP) was approved by the City's Development Review Committee on October 22, 1998 and consisted of the following major elements: • Principal use as the New Training and Counseling Center of 323,600 square feet located at the southeast corner of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street, • Visitor Parking Garage at 65 feet in height fronting on Franklin Street, • Employee Parking Garage at 65 feet in height at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue and • Stormwater detention area on Franklin Street. Since the original approval, the Church of Scientology has constructed the Flag Building with the interior buildout and final landscaping remaining to be completed. The Applicant has requested and the City has approved a Flexible Standard application for the Parking Garage. The City has issued building permits for the garage and construction has begun on this site. During the spring of 2006, the City determined that the building permits for the Flag Building had expired which resulted in the expiration of the Certified Site Plan as well. According to the Transition Rules of the new Community Development Code, a previously approved Certified Site Plan cannot be extended. Therefore, the Applicant is submitting this Flexible Standard application to re- approve the existing project under the Downtown District of the Community Development Code. Since the original approval, the Church has requested and the City has approved several changes to the Certified Site Plan. Since the changes have been approved previously, they are reflected on this Flexible Standard application and are described below. 1. The site of the original Employee Parking Structure at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue has been approved and constructed as the Central Energy Plant for the Church facilities. 2. The original Visitor Parking Structure has been approved with a revised site plan for a 4-story parking garage (FLS 02-03-26). The changes between the original Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 CSP approval and the revised site plan are the addition of one lot so that the site extends all the way to East Avenue, the reduction of the building height from 65 feet to four stories, and the addition of a central commissary and laundry facility. It should be noted that the Applicant has a pending application to make minor modifications to the approved site plan which was submitted to the City on July 17, 2006. 3. The stormwater detention area originally located on the south side of Franklin Street near the intersection of Garden Avenue has been relocated to the west side of the Central Energy Plant on Court Street. In its new location, this stormwater detention area continues to meet the stormwater needs of the Flag Building. The site of the original stormwater detention area is no longer a part of this construction or site plan but remains under the Applicant's ownership. In addition, a stormwater vault will be constructed under the parking garage to provide additional stormwater detention area for the garage. 4. The Applicant has utilized the City's Parking In-Lieu process and paid for 334 parking spaces of the total 809 spaces required for the Flag Building. With that payment, there remain a minimum of 475 parking spaces that must be constructed in the parking garage to meet the parking demand for the Flag Building. Both the approved garage design and the pending minor modification garage design will provide at least 475 parking spaces so that this requirement is met. 5. The original CSP for the Flag Building approved a six- story structure with a partial basement. At the request of the City of Clearwater, the Applicant relocated the staff cafeteria to this building, resulting in an increase in the size of the building by constructing a full basement instead of the partial basement. Therefore, the building permits that were approved for the Flag Building are for a six -story building with a full basement and four corner towers on the seventh level with limited usable space. In summary, the Applicant requests Flexible Standard approval of the Church of Scientology Flag Building and Parking Garage as a Place of Worship in the Downtown District pursuant to Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2of10 • • Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 The project's compliance with the General Applicability Criteria, the Flexible Standard Criteria for Places of Worship and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan are described below. 1. RESPONSES TO THE GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA (Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The property is located within the Downtown Core Character District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as are all surrounding properties. The Downtown Core District is the most intense and the most diverse district serving as the government center and principal employment area of the Downtown. The design of the Flag Building is intentionally urban in scale and character thus providing a model for downtown redevelopment. The architectural style of the Flag Building re-interprets the historic architecture of the Ft. Harrison Hotel in a modern design, using architectural elements and materials borrowed from the Mediterranean Revival style. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The properties in the immediate vicinity of the site on the west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue are developed with Peace Memorial Presbyterian Church and the Ft. Harrison Hotel. It is expected that these uses will remain in their current location at the current use although exterior renovations may be undertaken. The site to the immediate north of the subject site is owned by Pinellas County and used as a parking lot; the site further east on Pierce Street is owned by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority and operates as a bus transfer station. The site to the south of the subject site is also owned by the County and is used for administrative offices. It is likely that redevelopment of all sites on the east side of Ft. Harrison Avenue may occur and the urban design of the Flag Building will certainly encourage urban intensity and design of these parcels. It is not expected that the Flag Building will hinder this redevelopment or impair the value of the properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The use of the property as a church and counseling center poses no adverse affects on the health or safety of people residing or working in the area. Throughout Clearwater and other cities, churches are frequently located 9FIGINAL RECEIVED JUL Page 3 of 10 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Flag Building & Parkin g •ge • Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 close proximity to both residential and employment areas without creating adverse effects. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Flag Building has been carefully designed to minimize traffic congestion. First, there is no parking within the Flag Building site nor any driveways on Ft. Harrison Avenue that would disrupt free-flowing traffic on that street. Second, the loading area for the building is located on South Garden Avenue, a local street that is not a through street in this area. Third, the parking for the Flag Building will be met by the parking garage at 645 Franklin Street. This parking garage is intended for parishioners who will drive from their homes in the region to attend counseling and/or classes in the Flag Building. After parking in this garage, these parishioners can easily walk to the Flag Building for their activities. Parishioners from outside the region who reside in Church- operated hotels in the downtown generally do not rent cars during their stay since intra-campus transportation is provided with regular van service. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity of the site contains a mixture of uses including a church, parking, City and County administrative buildings and a hotel. The diversity of the area is as expected and desired on one of the major streets and districts in the Downtown. The project will contribute to the urban character of the area through its design and in attracting people to this religious institution. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Churches, by their very nature, generally do not have visual, acoustic or olfactory adverse effects on adjacent properties and this project will have few, if any, adverse impacts on adjacent properties. This property will be open during weekdays at similar hours as adjacent businesses. The Flag Building will also be open on the weekends in contrast to most of the downtown businesses who close for the weekend; therefore, the impact on downtown businesses will be minimal, if at all. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 4 of 10 Flag Building & Parking G•ge Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 II. RESPONSES TO THE FLEXIBLE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR PLACES OF WORSHIP (Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code) 1. Access: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. The parcel does not have direct access to Ft. Harrison Avenue, a major arterial street. The only access point for the project is on Garden Avenue and is used for loading purposes only. 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential property. Although the Downtown zoning district does have a height limit of 50 feet, since the 2004 adoption of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the City has consistently evaluated Downtown projects against the development standards of the Plan. The project is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Plan and there is no height limit in this area of that character district. It should also be noted that the project's height of 107 feet and 4 inches is compatible with its surrounding properties and with the Downtown Core Character District, as described in more detail in the next section beginning on page 6, analyzing the project's Compliance with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 3. Off-street parking: The total number of off-street parking spaces including off-site parking spaces within 600 feet of the parcel proposed for development will be available on a shared basis to meet the peak period demands of the facility. The total number of parking spaces required for the project were determined during the Certified Site Plan review process approved by the City in 1998. A review of that file indicates that several parking studies were prepared by the Applicant and approved by the City resulting in an agreement that 809 parking spaces are required for the site. The Applicant subsequently paid the in-lieu fee for 334 parking spaces, resulting in a minimum of 475 parking spaces that must be built in the parking garage to total the 809 parking space requirement. Therefore, the project meets its parking requirements through the previous in- lieu payment and the construction of the garage. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 Page 5 of 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The Flag Building was designed and constructed many years prior to the City of Clearwater's adoption of the new Downtown Redevelopment Plan and its Design Guidelines in 2004. However, the site and building design embody the key principles of the Design Guidelines and the project's consistency with the Guidelines has been evaluated. Please see the analysis in the section below starting on page 8, entitled " Compliance with the Design Guidelines." III. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWNREDEVELOPMENT PLAN As described above, the Flag Building is located in downtown Clearwater on South Ft. Harrison Avenue. The City of Clearwater adopted a new plan for downtown in 2004 entitled the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This plan divided the downtown into six character districts, each with distinct character, vision, function, development patterns and policies. The Flag Building is located within the Downtown Core character district which is the most intense and most diverse district within the downtown plan area. The Downtown Core character district is intended to remain as the center of government and principal employment area and is encouraged to develop with residential uses to complement and diversify the community. The Downtown Core district has the highest density and intensity measures of all the character districts at a maximum of 4.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for non-residential use, 70 dwelling units per acre for residential use and 95 units per acre for hotel use. Regarding the intended use as a place of worship, Policy 13 on page 52 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan states: "Places of worship and social/community centers are considered integral parts of the Downtown character districts. They are permitted uses that may located or expand at a scale consistent with the character district in which they are located provided that all site plan requirements are met." Therefore, the Flag Building as a place of worship is a permitted and encouraged use in the Downtown. The Flag Building meets the maximum Floor Area Ratio for the site and in actuality, is developed at less than the maximum FAR of 4.0. The Downtown Core district does not have a height limit in this area of the district; the building's height of 107 feet 4 inches is compatible with the adjacent Ft. Harrison Hotel, also owned by the Applicant. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 10 Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 The project is also consistent with several objectives and policies of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan listed below: Objective 2B: Cleveland Street and Fort Harrison Avenue shall be reclaimed as local streets to operate within Downtown for vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The project maintains Ft. Harrison Avenue's role as a local street by restricting its vehicular access to Garden Street and locating the loading area on this secondary roadway. Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The project has been designed to reflect the Mediterranean Revival style of the adjacent Ft. Harrison Hotel, which is one of Downtown's prevalent historic styles. The architectural style of the Flag Building is a modern interpretation of the Mediterranean Revival style and through its site design, stepbacks and lower height recognizes the primacy of the Hotel. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The project has designed and will construct enjoyable pedestrian paths on all sides of the building. A special feature designed for pedestrian safety and ease of access is the sky bridge across Ft. Harrison Avenue that connects the Flag Building with the Ft. Harrison Hotel. This sky bridge is designed with the same architectural style and materials as the Ft. Harrison Hotel and the Flag Building. The site design includes a pedestrian-friendly plaza at the main building entrance that functions as an inviting public space with seating and landscaping. Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. The parking garage contains spaces in excess of that required by the City code for the Flag Building so that other Church facilities may also use the garage as demand dictates. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 7 of 10 Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES The Flag Building was designed and constructed many years prior to the City of Clearwater's adoption of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and its Design Guidelines. However, the site and building design embody the key principles of the Design Guidelines and the project's consistency with the Guidelines is briefly described below. The Design Guidelines have three main sections to guide new construction: site design, building placement and building design. Each is discussed below as applied to the Flag Building. Site Design The Design Guidelines encourage retention of the existing street grid pattern and the existing street pattern is maintained by the project. The Guidelines encourage vehicular access from secondary streets, unobtrusive parking lots and good pedestrian circulation patterns. The project meets these criteria by locating the loading dock on Garden Street, the entrance to the parking garage on Franklin Street and through new pedestrian walkways around all four sides of the building. In addition, the parking garage has been designed to be consistent with the style of the Flag Building, the Central Energy Plant and the historic Ft. Harrison Hotel through its use of corner towers with decorative masonry and tile roofs. The Guidelines encourage well- designed public open spaces that are inviting to the pedestrian and function as a transition between the public realm of the sidewalk and the private realm of the interior of the building. As described above, the monumental main entrance at the corner of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Pierce contains an inviting usable public space including a pedestrian-friendly plaza with seating and landscaping. Building Placement The Guidelines encourage the building's location to contribute to the streetscape, buildings to be oriented towards the street, the maintenance of appropriate separations between buildings and building coverage consistent with the character district. The project meets the principles of building placement as the building is oriented towards the major street of Ft. Harrison Avenue and the secondary streets of Pierce and Franklin Streets. Two of the three adjacent sites of the intersection are historically significant buildings that occupy the entire block with their principal buildings (Ft. Harrison Hotel and the Peace Memorial Presbyterian Church). The Flag Building is consistent with this pattern of monumental principal buildings that occupy the entire block and the building's mass and scale are also consistent with its two adjacent neighbors. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 28 2006 Page 8 of 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 ORIGINAL 40 RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Building Design The Guidelines encourage new construction to contribute to the character district and to respect the existing pattern of development through its form, mass and scale, and architectural style. As stated above, the Flag Building continues the pattern of monumental buildings at the intersection of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street. The height, width, mass and scale of the Flag Building are consistent with the two existing historical buildings at the intersection. The architecture of the Flag Building reflects the Mediterranean Revival style that is prevalent in Downtown Clearwater and that occurs immediately opposite the site at the Ft. Harrison Hotel. Each facade of the building is consistent with the Mediterranean Revival style with the hierarchy of design treatment given first to the Ft. Harrison Avenue fagade, followed closely by the Pierce and Franklin facades and lastly, the Garden fagade that contains the loading facilities. The Flag Building has a distinct base, middle and cap to differentiate each major section of the building and has a sophisticated fenestration pattern within each section and fagade. Stepbacks on each fagade and towers at the four corners are also used to provide visual interest and variation in the massing of the building. The Guidelines encourage buildings on corner lots to emphasize their prominent location and the Flag Building has capitalized on its comer location through an architectural prominent entrance, a public plaza and distinctive architectural treatment of the entrance and the corner facades. Miscellaneous Sections There are two additional sections of the Design Guidelines that should be mentioned: the section on Signs and Appendix 10, Representative Downtown Architecture. The Guidelines encourage signs to be designed as an integral part of the building and to compliment the building through the selection of materials, style and design. The proposed sign on the main entrance reinforces the architectural style of the Flag Building by integrating the sign into the main fagade of the building. The sign over the front entrance has the effect more like a decoration on the building rather than a sign denoting the name of the building. There are no freestanding signs proposed at the Flag Building site. The signs at the parking garage are also integrated into the building design as the signs are located on the towers. The parking garage also contains freestanding directory type signs at pedestrian access points to provide an orientation/location of the Church facilities in the area. For properties fronting on Ft. Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets, Appendix 10 of the Guidelines encourage the use of an architectural style indicative of those found in Downtown Clearwater between 1900 and 1950. The project meets this principle since the design incorporates major elements of the Mediterranean Revival style Page 9 of 10 Flag Building & Parking Garage Response to Criteria July 28, 2006 as found generally in downtown and specifically found immediately adjacent to the site in the Ft. Harrison Hotel. In summary, the Flag Building is consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan in the following ways: The project is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan; The project is consistent with the Downtown Core character district generally and with the specific provisions of the district regarding the use and intensity standards; and The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines for new construction. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 10 of 10 0 0 ATTACHMENT A-REVISED RECEIVED FLEXIBLE STANDARD APPLICATION SEP 2 9 2006 FLAG BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 215 SOUTH FT. HARRISON AVENUE CITY OF CLEARWATER The purpose of this request is to re-approve the Church of Scientology's Flag Building in downtown Clearwater. The Flag Building and its related facilities were approved through the Certified Site Plan process under the previous Zoning Code. The Certified Site Plan (CSP) was approved by the City's Development Review Committee on October 22, 1998 and consisted of the following major elements; • Principal use as the New Training and Counseling Center of 323,600 square feet located at the southeast corner of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street, • Visitor Parking Garage at 65 feet in height fronting on Franklin Street, • Employee Parking Garage at 65 feet in height at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue, and • Stormwater detention area on Franklin Street. Since the original approval, the Church of Scientology has constructed the Flag Building with the interior buildout and final landscaping remaining to be completed. The Applicant has requested and the City has approved a Flexible Standard application for the Parking Garage. The City has issued building permits for the garage and construction has begun on this site. A minor revision to the Parking Garage Development Order was approved by the City on August 18, 2006. Although the Parking Garage serves the Flag Building, since the garage has previously received approval by the City, that site and building are not a part of this application. During the spring of 2006, the City determined that the building permits for the Flag Building had expired which resulted in the expiration of the Certified Site Plan as well. According to the Transition Rules of the new Community Development Code, a previously approved Certified Site Plan cannot be extended. Therefore, the Applicant is submitting this Flexible Standard application to re- approve the existing project under the Downtown District of the Community Development Code. Since the original approval, the Church has requested and the City has approved several changes to the Certified Site Plan. Since the changes have been approved previously, they are reflected on this Flexible Standard application and are described below. 1. The site of the original Employee Parking Structure at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue has been approved and constructed as the Central Energy Plant for the Church facilities. 2. The original Visitor Parking Structure has been approved with a revised site plan for a 4-story parking garage (FLS 02-03-26). The changes between the original Flag Building & Parking age Response to Criteria CSP approval and the revised site plan are the addition of one lot so that the site extends all the way to East Avenue, the reduction of the building height from 65 feet to four stories, and the addition of a central commissary and laundry facility. It should be noted that the Applicant has a pending application to make minor modifications to the approved site plan which was submitted to the City on July 17, 2006. The stormwater detention area originally located on the south side of Franklin Street near the intersection of Garden Avenue has been relocated to the west side of the Central Energy Plant on Court Street. In its new location, this stormwater detention area continues to meet the stormwater needs of the Flag Building. The site of the original stormwater detention area is no longer a part of this construction or site plan but remains under the Applicant's ownership. In addition, a stormwater vault will be constructed under the parking garage to provide additional stormwater detention area for the garage. 4. The Applicant has utilized the City's Parking In-Lieu process and paid for 334 parking spaces of the total 809 spaces required for the Flag Building. With that payment, there remain a minimum of 475 parking spaces that must be constructed in the parking garage to meet the parking demand for the Flag Building. Both the approved garage design and the pending minor modification garage design will provide at least 475 parking spaces so that this requirement is met. The original CSP for the Flag Building approved a six- story structure with a partial basement. At the request of the City of Clearwater, the Applicant relocated the staff cafeteria to this building, resulting in an increase in the size of the building by constructing a full basement instead of the partial basement. Therefore, the building permits that were approved for the Flag Building are for a six -story building with a full basement and four corner towers on the seventh level with limited usable space. In summary, the Applicant requests Flexible Standard approval of the Church of Scientology Flag Building as a Place of Worship in the Downtown District pursuant to Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code. RECEIVED SEP 2 J 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 10 Flag Building & Parking•age • Response to Criteria The project's compliance with the General Applicability Criteria, the Flexible Standard Criteria for Places of Worship and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan are described below. L RESPONSES TO THE GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA (Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The property is located within the Downtown Core Character District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as are all surrounding properties. The Downtown Core District is the most intense and the most diverse district serving as the government center and principal employment area of the Downtown. The design of the Flag Building is intentionally urban in scale and character thus providing a model for downtown redevelopment. The architectural style of the Flag Building re-interprets the historic architecture of the Ft. Harrison Hotel in a modern design, using architectural elements and materials borrowed from the Mediterranean Revival style. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The properties in the immediate vicinity of the site on the west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue are developed with Peace Memorial Presbyterian Church and the Ft. Harrison Hotel. It is expected that these uses will remain in their current location at the current use although exterior renovations may be undertaken. The site to the immediate north of the subject site is owned by Pinellas County and used as a parking lot; the site further east on Pierce Street Q is owned by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority and operates as a bus L a transfer station. The site to the south of the subject site is also owned by the C" 3 County and is used for administrative offices. It is likely that redevelopment W ?' o of all sites on the east side of Ft. Harrison Avenue may occur and the urban A : design of the Flag Building will certainly encourage urban intensity and design . f of these parcels. It is not expected that the Flag Building will hinder this -•- •- 8 redevelopment or impair the value of the properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The use of the property as a church and counseling center poses no adverse affects on the health or safety of people residing or working in the area, Throughout Clearwater and other cities, churches are frequently located in Page 3 of 10 Flag Building & Parkingtrage • Response to Criteria close proximity to both residential and employment areas without creating adverse effects. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Flag Building has been carefully designed to minimize traffic congestion. First, there is no parking within the Flag Building site nor any driveways on Ft. Harrison Avenue that would disrupt free-flowing traffic on that street. Second, the loading area for the building is located on South Garden Avenue, a local street that is not a through street in this area. Third, the parking for the Flag Building will be met by the parking garage at 645 Franklin Street. This parking garage is intended for parishioners who will drive from their homes in the region to attend counseling and/or classes in the Flag Building. After parking in this garage, these parishioners can easily walk to the Flag Building for their activities. Parishioners from outside the region who reside in Church- operated hotels in the downtown generally do not rent cars during their stay since intra-campus transportation is provided with regular van service. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity of the site contains a mixture of uses including a church, parking, City and County administrative buildings and a hotel. The diversity of the area is as expected and desired on one of the major streets and districts in the Downtown. The project will contribute to the urban character of the area through its design and in attracting people to this religious institution. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Churches, by their very nature, generally do not have visual, acoustic or olfactory adverse effects on adjacent properties and this project will have few, if any, adverse impacts on adjacent properties. This property will be open during weekdays at similar hours as adjacent businesses. The Flag Building will also be open on the weekends in contrast to most of the downtown businesses who close for the weekend; therefore, the impact on downtown businesses will be minimal, if at all. in C= W ° 3 > M LLJ C'2 zo L" LU Z it Page 4 of 10 Flag Building & Parkingtrage Response to Criteria II. RESPONSES TO THE FLEXIBLE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR PLACES OF WORSHIP (Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code) 1. Access: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. The parcel does not have direct access to Ft. Harrison Avenue, a major arterial street. The only access point for the project is on Garden Avenue and is used for loading purposes only. 2. Height. a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential property. Although the Downtown zoning district does have a height limit of 50 feet, since the 2004 adoption of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the City has consistently evaluated Downtown projects against the development standards of the Plan. The project is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Plan and there is no height limit in this area of that character district. It should also be noted that the project's height of 107 feet and 4 inches is compatible with its surrounding properties and with the Downtown Core Character District, as described in more detail in the next section beginning on page 6, analyzing the project's Compliance with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 3. Off-street parking: The total number of off-street parking spaces including off-site parking spaces within 600 feet of the parcel proposed for development will be available on a shared basis to meet the peak period demands of the facility. The total number of parking spaces required for the project were determined during the Certified Site Plan review process approved by the City in 1998. A review of that file indicates that several parking studies were prepared by the Applicant and approved by the City resulting in an agreement that 809 parking spaces are required for the site. The Applicant subsequently paid the in-lieu 0 ° fee for 334 parking spaces, resulting in a minimum of 475 parking spaces that rn must be built in the parking garage to total the 809 parking space requirement. L u co Therefore, the project meets its parking requirements through the previous in- U U. w ? o Z lieu payment and the prior approval of the garage. Page 5 of 10 Fla Buildin & Parkin tg r e g g Response to Criteria 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The Flag Building was designed and constructed many years prior to the City of Clearwater's adoption of the new Downtown Redevelopment Plan and its Design Guidelines in 2004. However, the site and building design embody the key principles of the Design Guidelines and the project's consistency with the Guidelines has been evaluated. Please see the analysis in the section below starting on page 8, entitled " Compliance with the Design Guidelines." III. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN As described above, the Flag Building is located in downtown Clearwater on South Ft. Harrison Avenue. The City of Clearwater adopted a new plan for downtown in 2004 entitled the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This plan divided the downtown into six character districts, each with distinct character, vision, function, development patterns and policies. The Flag Building is located within the Downtown Core character district which is the most intense and most diverse district within the downtown plan area. The Downtown Core character district is intended to remain as the center of government and principal employment area and is encouraged to develop with residential uses to complement and diversify the community. The Downtown Core district has the highest density and intensity measures of all the character districts at a maximum of 4.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for non-residential use, 70 dwelling units per acre for residential use and 95 units per acre for hotel use. Regarding the intended use as a place of worship, Policy 13 on page 52 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan states: "Places of worship and social/community centers are considered integral parts of the Downtown character districts. They are permitted uses that may located or expand at a scale consistent with the character district in which they are located provided that all site plan requirements are met." Therefore, the Flag Building as a place of worship is a permitted and encouraged use in the Downtown. The Flag Building meets the maximum Floor Area Ratio for the site and in actuality, is developed at less than the maximum FAR of 4.0. The Downtown Core district does not have a height limit in this area of the district; the building's height of 107 feet 4 inches is compatible with the adjacent Ft. Harrison Hotel, also owned by the licant. W ? C.0 C J ? LU - W lL U A' 1.? i LLJJ Z 0 LU C/) y Page 6 of 10 Flag Building & Parkingtrage Response to Criteria The project is also consistent with several objectives and policies of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan listed below: Objective 2B: Cleveland Street and Fort Harrison Avenue shall be reclaimed as local streets to operate within Downtown for vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The project maintains Ft. Harrison Avenue's role as a local street by restricting its vehicular access to Garden Street and locating the loading area on this secondary roadway. Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The project has been designed to reflect the Mediterranean Revival style of the adjacent Ft. Harrison Hotel, which is one of Downtown's prevalent historic styles. The architectural style of the Flag Building is a modern interpretation of the Mediterranean Revival style and through its site design, stepbacks and lower height recognizes the primacy of the Hotel. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The project has designed and will construct enjoyable pedestrian paths on all sides of the building. A special feature designed for pedestrian safety and ease of access is the sky bridge across Ft. Harrison Avenue that connects the Flag Building with the Ft. Harrison Hotel. This sky bridge is designed with the same architectural style and materials as the Ft. Harrison Hotel and the Flag Building. The site design includes a pedestrian-friendly plaza at the main building entrance that functions as an inviting public space with seating and landscaping. Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. The parking garage serving the Flag Building contains spaces in excess of that required by the City code for the Flag Building so that other Church facilities may also use the garage as demand dictates. The parking garage has been previously approved by the City and is not a part of this application. ® ?_ & V CL- (D zo LJU C Page 7 of 10 Flag Building & Parking arage Response to Criteria IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES The Flag Building was designed and constructed many years prior to the City of Clearwater's adoption of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and its Design Guidelines. However, the site and building design embody the key principles of the Design Guidelines and the project's consistency with the Guidelines is briefly described below. The Design Guidelines have three main sections to guide new construction: site design, building placement and building design. Each is discussed below as applied to the Flag Building. Site Design The Design Guidelines encourage retention of the existing street grid pattern and the existing street pattern is maintained by the project. The Guidelines encourage vehicular access from secondary streets, unobtrusive parking lots and good pedestrian circulation patterns. The project meets these criteria by locating the loading dock on Garden Street, the entrance to the parking garage on Franklin Street and through new pedestrian walkways around all four sides of the building. The Guidelines encourage well- designed public open spaces that are inviting to the pedestrian and function as a transition between the public realm of the sidewalk and the private realm of the interior of the building. As described above, the monumental main entrance at the corner of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Pierce contains an inviting usable public space including a pedestrian-friendly plaza with seating and landscaping. Building Placement The Guidelines encourage the building's location to contribute to the streetscape, buildings to be oriented towards the street, the maintenance of appropriate separations between buildings and building coverage consistent with the character district. The project meets the principles of building placement as the building is oriented towards the major street of Ft. Harrison Avenue and the secondary streets of Pierce and Franklin Streets. Two of the three adjacent sites of the intersection are historically significant buildings that occupy the entire block with their principal buildings (Ft. Harrison Hotel and the Peace Memorial Presbyterian Church). The Flag Building is consistent with this pattern of monumental principal buildings that occupy the entire block and the building's mass and scale are also consistent with its two adjacent neighbors. Building Design The Guidelines encourage new construction to contribute to the character district and to respect the existing pattern of development through its form, mass and scale, ar architectural style. As stated above, the Flag Building continues the pattern of 1 ?-CEIV L 2 9 2[` .: a:givG WARTMt,. Page 8 of 10 .OF CLEARWATER Flag Building & Parking t rage Response to Criteria monumental buildings at the intersection of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street. The height, width, mass and scale of the Flag Building are consistent with the two existing historic buildings at the intersection. The architecture of the Flag Building reflects the Mediterranean Revival style that is prevalent in Downtown Clearwater and that occurs immediately opposite the site at the Ft. Harrison Hotel. Each fagade of the building is consistent with the Mediterranean Revival style with the hierarchy of design treatment given first to the Ft. Harrison Avenue fagade, followed closely by the Pierce and Franklin facades and lastly, the Garden fagade that contains the loading facilities. The Flag Building has a distinct base, middle and cap to differentiate each major section of the building and has a sophisticated fenestration pattern within each section and fagade. Stepbacks on each fagade and towers at the four corners are also used to provide visual interest and variation in the massing of the building. The Guidelines encourage buildings on corner lots to emphasize their prominent location and the Flag Building has capitalized on its corner location through an architectural prominent entrance, a public plaza and distinctive architectural treatment of the entrance and the corner facades. Miscellaneous Sections There are two additional sections of the Design Guidelines that should be mentioned: the section on Signs and Appendix 10, Representative Downtown Architecture. The Guidelines encourage signs to be designed as an integral part of the building and to compliment the building through the selection of materials, style and design. The proposed sign on the main entrance reinforces the architectural style of the Flag Building by integrating the sign into the main fagade of the building. The sign over the front entrance has the effect more like a decoration on the building rather than a sign denoting the name of the building. There are no freestanding signs proposed at the Flag Building site. The signs at the parking garage are also integrated into the building design as the signs are located on the towers. The parking garage also contains freestanding directory type signs at pedestrian access points to provide an orientation/location of the Church facilities in the area. For properties fronting on Ft. Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets, Appendix 10 of the Guidelines encourage the use of an architectural style indicative of those found in Downtown Clearwater between 1900 and 1950. The project meets this principle since the design incorporates major elements of the Mediterranean Revival style as found generally in downtown and specifically found immediately adjacent to the site in the Ft. Harrison Hotel. RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2006 Page 9 of 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Flag Building & Parkingtrage Response to Criteria In summary, the Flag Building is consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan in the following ways: • The project is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan; • The project is consistent with the Downtown Core character district generally and with the specific provisions of the district regarding the use and intensity standards; and • The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines for new construction. R EC 1? SEP 2 11 "106 7iANNINGDEPA9"' CITYOF CFA v Page 10 of 10 Clearwater Fire & Rescue A 610 Franklin Street - Clearwater, Florida 33756 Public Works Administration -Engineering Department o . _ 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756 - - FIREFL01N; & HYDRANT 1NORKSHEFET -- - - (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted. to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that, will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14; 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 - Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Fl-.4j& 8i_3JL0tl3G. Project Address: 21T S-%o ?xi 1-T- _H A 9R1SOAJ ERAL ATER SYSTEM INFORMATLN Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant: SoQ*H GAP-OE, PgVE• =fA3T s: e7 oF_$vuc?lav? Hydrant#: 56 Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: Looped System or Dead End Water Main? ?LA? ENO Static: Gb psi Residual: 56 psi Pitot: yy psi Flow: 11a6 Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Rise: Horizontal 0 Ft. Vertical Elevation 3 Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by: CiT Y O CLjAAt,%3Azk(L wKAU. UE AR'rjAti7T (Include/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) NrP'A HAZARD CLAS,SfFICATION Area # Classification Description of Hazard Protected (Commodity Description, Storage Height and Arrangement, Xapplicable): ?. ottIZ)?pA(LY GiftevP 2 V%%TVA-EA) I-le iiT HAZAAp. OFFler SAVAc ORIGINAL RECEIVED Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary JUL 2 8 2006 Page 1 of 3 PLANNING DEPAR11* NT CITY OF CLEARWATER r DESIGN PARAMETERS Area # System Type Area (sq. ft.) Density (gpm/ft) Inside Hose (gpm) Outside Hose (gpm) / ?VrrT 150o O?ao 100 IS-0 2 W t7? /5100 040 i oo iSo Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Total Needed Fire Flow (N.F.F.) Is Existing System Supply Sufficient to Meet N.F.F. Above? CODES AND STANDARDS System Component SWv x,_r e sYs llfm P?t???Te fi?.E S?Ri?oc? M.at.vs ??SFi?e'T7v vbd /+7Ai614 Tan AIA.F ?v,- Pi Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Applicable NFPf NFP,A i3-4?' N FPA 2y -qS' ,v FPA - 2S- 5f .NAPA Ao -qr9 No K Yes 1 Standard / Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes 90Ck FL01-10A Bu%Ivi'vc lolJF atY , Fl_,>O 4N t 1)%LbN 06 GmD? 2cbi tL&LxbA p?rtt?? co:i? acc>l FLc x 0A %Q % L01" C&06 If Project Includes Fire Pump, Supply the Following: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capacity: /D?X> gpm Churn Pressure: 13s- psi Rated Pressure: /SD psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: qlcl -psi On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): NAy6 PREPARER / SPECIFIER INFORMATION` Preparer Name: 64N SI E)JLU.lJ?) Company Name: 0IV61NEE1qf.vf3 PR?Fc55i?+?1rtLS ire. Mailing Address: OaD w 6s'- CI,JECgNLJ Srz&Er Su;i E F City: 74,4 Ph State: FLORI,0 q Zip: 3s" Phone: 16 i3^ aS1 67`O Fax: '213- M -1Y6g '. E. Seal ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 Page 2 of 3 PLAN141 O L?r"-RIIVILNt CITY OF CLEARWATER SC 1000 G.P.M. 912 SERIES ELECTRIC MOTOR DRIVE SIZE : 5-481-11B / 5-483-11B MODEL: 480 IMPELLER : Enclosed • Section 912 Page 417 Date June 2002 Supersedes Section 912 Page 417 Dated November 2001 R. P. M.: 3560 P. PATE. NO. 444A177 \SE PATT. NO. 180A263 UPPER (ALL) 180A262 LOWER (481) 180A264 LOWER (463) 200 ?_. 160 2 6 100 Ci 120 w w 2 50 80 185 1000 BHP 1500 200 BHP FOR 200 PSI CURVE 100 BHP FOR 120 PSI CURVE 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2550 75 100 125 100 200 300 400 500 SIZE : 5-481-11C/5-483-11C MODEL: 480 IMPELLER : Enclosed IMP. PATT. NO. 240 160 CASE PATT. NO. 2 180A 63 UPPER (ALL) 200 180A262 LOWER (481) 180A264 LOWER (483) 60% 70% 75 % 120 1fi0 80% 160 PSI , . 150 PSI 83 % 9 L ' O 120 135 PSI r 80% 80 zo PSl 75 p 105 PSI 70 0- 80 90 PSI \ W W ? 40 40 10 00 1500 BHP 200 BHP FOR 160 PSI CURV E BH P FO R 90 PSI CURVE 100 0 U.S. GPM 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 US 25, 5o 75 100 125 M1/HR 100 200 300 400 500 1 • C1 ORIGINAL PC-123055 RECEIVED JUL 2 S 2006 R. P. M. : 3560 as M.: - CANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER .1 • •. 1 I,L;-1Z3U56 C!p AURORX Pentair Pump Group I 05/02/2006 10:03 727445 c- .?a, y f PUBLIC UTILITIES FLOW TEST CITY OF CLE4RWATER WATER DEPARTMENT PAGE 01 PAGE 02 RESIDUAL PSI 5 EQUESTING TEST ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 28 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DD1COlA`(NQRMAZION REQUIRED Fire Prevention{Items to be Addressed Phorto DRC Approval , r ,._.:_1.._,ProvideeFire_Flow.Xalculations:/,Water. Study by a FIRE PROTECTION -to assure_an:,adequate :water-supply..is...-:.:?_.., :..,._. ... vailable and''- to'determine. if -anyupgrades`_are required- bythe developer due tol'the impact`of-this'project.: The water°supply,~, . - .. must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If afire pump is required, the-water. supply must 6e' ablee to supply-1:50%0- of: its; rated capacity:..-Compliance. with, the. 2004 Florida: Fire preVention. Code, to include:, NFPA`13 NFPA 74 NFPA 20 NFPA,291 and'NFP.A,1142.(Annex.H) is required. y ' When`airFDC is required it-'s-hall be a-minimum--of 1'5'feet from building and'shall'have afire hydrant within 401feet: This hydrant" _,:..,shall.`,not be tocated' on:the=sarrie' main,-as?.the Fite; Sprinkler.-andmust`be:-on? the: supply side of::.a-douba'e detector:check. valve . " This -hydeanfis' in-addition to-the hydrant that is required for firefighting purposes that is to be- within, 300 feetof_building,-as-the hose lays, and on the same side of the street as-the project. Provide andsktow`onk'the plan a minimum;30-foot-,tuming:.radius . for: emergency vehiclejngress, and:egress at alVentrances and exits. : -_. , .:.: _.;,. ,.. _..:...... 4. Provide and show on the site plan 24 feet of width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle ingress and egress for front and. rear parking lots. Where driveways are split by an island with one-way traffic, each side of the :island shall provide and show on the site plan 20, feet of width at the driveways on each side of the island. 5':'?7'Pr6vide a Fire Department access,roadway (with turn-around; Y, T'or cul=de-sac)' in accordance wa#h. 1Ft?A.1 _. A Fire Bepartment ° -. access roadway must have 24-foot clear width and 14-foot vertical clearance, and be capable of supporting the weight of Fire Department vehicles (80,000lbs). 2379 3road St3rocksvii1e, -orda 34604-689-8 5 f / 3. 5._7 ) 79-6-721 or .1-8GC-422<-1 -6 (;= oniyl _ 1/1?? u ?? Sul`lCOM 628 4_50 7 QC aniy 1800-%3" ci03 ;L_ ody)- vri die'nfem.etar• WaterNiaters-org An oval Coocrunrty Tampa Service Office Bartow: Service Office Sarasota Service Ofires ' Lecanto Service Office ' =poyer 760 .:Highway 301 North: 170 Century Boulevard 6750 Fmitville Road 3600 Nest Sovereign _ gTl Path - ' amoa, Frorida 33637-0750 3artow; Fonda 33830-7700 Sarasota Fionda 3424O97L- Suite Z6 (813) 9857481 0l. 863).534-1,4=8 or. (941), 377-3722 or Lacanta, ,9orida 341A61-3070 _800-836.0797 (FL only) 1. 00-192-7862 (F only) 1300-320-3503 (F_ only) f 52) 527 8_3= SUNCOM 57$-2070. SUNCOM 572-8200 SUNCOM 531-3900 3UNC0M o0"7-3271 June 11 2002 Ronnie S.:Duncan Chair,'Pinetias i s Thomas. G: Dabney, li Vice Chair, Sarasota (RI 1 ?,' i E b Wrl ht Heide B. McCrea Church of Scientology Fceiigious ! rrlst a Secretary, Hillsborough 31`9. S.outh.. CGrden Avenue Watson L Baynes, It " . _ f"i_ 3a75i1 .. Clearwater Treasurer, Pinellas , F?warH'VIE.:Ciiance 1 . f Manatee S.ubtect.. N:otics o f Ff.nal.Agen:ey Action `ar: AP srovaI Monroe A[" Caogier l ERP Standard General. C arTstruaffan clues. . Perrn:it No: 440Z2001 . Maggie N. Dominguez P'rafect Mamie: Church of Scientbiogy Pefj&us' Trust( - blaster Hillsborough DfalrTa.ge Fad IIty Pamela L Fentress C'atlnty:. r tn ?l kas ' EFig!ilands , Rorraid?.C: Johnson ? C I WP/ ge` 16i 5SY1::E Janet D.. Koracfr Dear Mr. Wn,':Qht: 4iBshorough John M: Reake, HI TtTis fetter .canstltutes. notice of Final 4gen ~y Action far apgraval of tb-e permit appllcafin.n ' Pasco referenced above. Fi:nal.app'rova'l :rs ccritingent u.pen n-n: aoiecti:o'n:ta the "Qistrict? action-being re 4•;`?ed fey .t;, e D.stri°cf uviffiin file time f=games "descri:bed bel:ow.: ?. D. ".Sonny" Yergara . E ec rove Ilitector you o.r any persen wf?ose._substantsal interests are affectedy tare District`s. a.ctlan .l ec.a.rdig Gene A. Heath a peu tit may. .raqu:es: an adrT1}nlSFTailve :he ri.n. in aIICQrd:an:Ce WI.LI1 ' .SerI.Q'[75 1.20.5&D :nd ` Assistant E ecutive Director - 120 ST sF a , and Ch'apter28-1'ae Monda:Admirristrafive Cade EF D:}: ox ri1 ? lriiorr { ufes " William 5 Bdenky General co r;eei of Pracndure : !i r?a,,.uestror;heanba must () explain hour! he substantial interests ,of each RersQrrregccesrxrg th :krear?ng uvrif b"e arr=eter 1zy;t -~ istri?.`s -acziarr, or proposed.actia .( ? " state alT Fnefanal-Facts drspufea fey the perzor ra uestirrg the i?esring ar state that-there. are ' rya drsput&d pacts arro°(3? at_6rwlse:campf with :?haprerZ? 1,0E :F:A.C Coates efSecti:an°s y? 28 106 ? and 28 1 Q X01 F A C are en:ctos2 . for yacir reverence., A rat}uesttfb. earu, rnus`?te tlF`e uul (4recelued E?y} cfla oe? ey Clerk of the. Ufa ict at the Dlstd;cia Crao,IF'vtlle " addresswitafhi. ?ctays:of Pec6bt Qrfhls,. ti, R:acet i ;deemed td..be the "iih dad aTertfi:e. date on Bich ibis notice i-- deepaslfed lnzfte Ur7ired Sates mall: Failure to t%ie a:cea.ues r Gl?arlriQ within thrs tlm penod shall :constitute a waiver of any sight vo:u orsu.ch. per•.sc n, may . aue fo reguest a,hearng. LrnQ.ersect 120.56-0 and..1,2.Q,57, F-S. 1. ediati:on ursz{ant to rTS Se b6 T20 t3,, t.:S-, fo set=tle air adritrrristrafve ciisp:ute:rega -ailTgg. tike Qlstri:ct1 aefi.an In tiifrs ratter is- not auallabte ono.r"tQ the `lin g (DV a re nest rIIC`:earrn: = w .. Enclos=ed Is .a 'Notidry :Packet". treat provides `intcrfrat-ior .re.g-a.ra.rng the Dlsfri-cf ?;ule 40:D 1 ;10:;10 .?..A C , >i+ lca addresses the nati:>reafion or persarts wh`GSe.substantiaf-n r?Sts. . n ay be au ected by the:District..s acti=on In tfiis rnatier. Fh,e.packet contains guidelines .an frow ? '-.. ta: aravid:e notice or th:e rstrict`s action. dri(f anotice fhatynu.Inay use.. 7th :e er)cl'Osed apamved abrTstmdiO:iT`Ui. ms; are l3aiL-IIr th? pHrt Tjt, aT7d'IIOfiSiLIJ:CI1Cxn rilu5i t7L_.. .. m acgordan. !a w. ltht ese;pea_ns. - - ORIGINAL RECE1VEt7- .. ...,.- - JUL 28 2056 PLANNING .DERARtn11EN1• . " = uroie<m, ng .;bur CITY OF CLEARWATER : SOU T -WEST FLORIDA v/VA TER MANAGEMENT D(STRIc EINVIRONIVIEN-i AL RESOURCE STANDARD GENERAL CONS-RUCTiON.M.001FiCA71ON _ Ei-?LtI 7NO. 449229.85':a.O:Y C.I Li+vLl 01 ac,ento+_ngy r( 11PYi c1sl - 1111as1ar Drainage F L _ . f. Water auantfty/Q.uaiity . En+wraachr?.e;nt:. C:orn pesata G::om:p.ertsafiQrr Encroachment ,?Acrte-Fee# of Fib!) . (Aare Fea# df Type Result (Feet) Excavaffo:n) N.A N/A,: Er r,,,,7entai Ccrrsi`c3.,er trams .. No weaancs cratn:ersurraca iaters exis:within?the pro.}e:ci area: VVaiers;ned name; Lipper Co;astai Drainage Ie ;ulatcry.conservation easement Is not?:requarad ' =a;.pr0pti.etary conservati-cn easement is not'fequired.-._ - S.RE,CI Fl:C CO, ' BE i i:O:N.S T _ . ff fhe cwne iii F of.tth:e proledt aroma-covared. by=th2 sub?ecr perrcii is divided with'sO;tTleaTle other than the ermitteaebecornm the, o. riser of part :d 2r ;P:rojecf ar=a ttri$ pe€rnit-sftalf.term:ina :E, pursu2nf a p ion-4OD 1 :61:06; F a C In suc3 situations ea:ch land owner shalt abtai?r a n&,mit (Which; m2y ?E. e mod rication` of phis:permit) r`or rh:e. la d :owned Lw- fat oersan: `Teas candmon. si- all M.I ap'C V a trite si:ori and sale of=lots ar,units in residen2lai subdi,4suns or carTdo.mrn{uTri-S.. 2. The discharges from this system shall meet state water quality standards as set fort in Chaatn 62-.302 and S.ctic:n 62-x.242„ r.,A,.C, for class waters equivalent to the :eceivin.g waters. . 1 _• C_ Permit N:c. 440?92085.00.1 Prrlject Name: Church of.SCientology.,Religious. ,-LFSt - Master Drainage Facifity Page 3. Unless soecizied otherwise herein,twc copies of ail inform. ation.and..rancTts-reyuir.=d" by tfiis permia s ial.l be submitted to: Tampa F,egufatio.n DepartrrTent . Sauthwest ;F arida Water Marragem.ent District.. - 7601 U. S. Highway 30:.1 'North Tampa, FL aW37-67.9 _ L e. r pe, v it , n.umbe?, title of rep.art. or inrarmatiian and event (for reCUrirT.g, repor or ifiormatian. submittal) shall be.identifed an- allinformation and reports.subnnitted 4. The:Der , ttan shall ret --n the desicn, engi?:eer, ar_Qttier professtcnat engineer registered in FlaridaY. td condu:a an site o:bservatio:ns or canstructiian-and assist v?ith ttr.e as builtcartificatiq. requfrernents or this project_ Tf7e.Permittee shaff infarm Lire 1 ist _cc in wnturg: of th:e rTame..ada-ess. anal pfrcn.. n.u.n ber.of t7Te essi°ona1 engineer sa er ip:lo-yed. This inrarrnation.sha}f`be submitted pdar to canstrv:cti orr• . . a:: vLitnin -w-days .after camrpletion of °censtruction.af tti.e permitted: activity, tti.e Perrrittee sh,a1f submit. 'to the T am:Pa Service. ?ice a written: statement of carmpietionn and certincation by. a register ed- : . professional e?igi;near or.attrer appre;pr ate individual as.'au.flm *zed.by law,. utilizing tli.e required Statement of Can?pletion and Request-for, Trans"erto OPeratio:ri:Entity fom -identifi.e?din Chapter 4OD-1 F. :C acrd.sigr:ed, dated-, arzdsaaled as built drawings .T h"e :as=built ar3viircgs shaft identiT .,. . any,deviatidns rrum th-e approved cons -u:cdoR craw..rngs.. c. ne D stnct reserves the right, upor pn:ar notice to the 'Perm, ittee, to conduct on-site research to .: assess the Pollutant remavaf efFii:cienCp QT'the sLutace_waterrnanagement systerT:_. The Pe;crri: ee maybe regii ked to .coo:perate in this regard b- affowi-rrg an-site-access ty pistri:ct representatives, by aflowir:g:the icistaflation and o:perata.Qn oftL Ling and' m'01 equicm- d tr and by alfavvirig ott. e.r .. assistance measures as needed an site. The I i7e O'peratiaf and rrLatt'teClanC.B eRLity"SiTafl. Si7bmlt.lnspe.'flOr? reDaTT in ille .FOrirT re u:lre by ti1:E . District. in aecC:rdarrcC with the fidiiowing schedule_ -Far systems utilizing efTlaent: fJtrati:ori at e?i;ltratica- .or systems . Litiiizin.g e?-flueat : ilt>aticn or e iiltrati:an anal rets?Tt?:on or. wet detenti:on,. fhe insp?ep iarrs. shall 'be pe :Qrmed.1 M 1 T.ar?ttrs after ope:ratian is auzfi-acizAd anal ewer--18 m;ants tfterea:er, E. Fer dry ot?zm detention systems, the defentian areas) shall becarrTe• dry Wthir -36 hcucr- .after .a - ---- _ " -- - raT:} event.-lr G eren#i:on area is red-ulariy wez; this- sitili iaiR ??: if be aemed'ta be "a iar2tiori -- - -- -- - Thts ;izrndFfrcatior Corrsrr;uctiarr` Rarn:iit 4402-2981:OQ1 . amends the .preuto.usly issue G.orrstPictPerri:it:Nc.. 44:0 hB Q_6 x.0'0,,"arid all cand.i icas are re.plaeed'by.tb:e conoi ions herein..:, 10. Refe to ?E1VE R-A COi`LDfTi:Oi . fVo. 1s Iiereir. ORIGINAL. RECFivER .:JUL 28 006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CITY OF CLEARWATER _ 4a p [dJST f 9.1-119740 AUG 14, 1991. 2:35F•M r ., Q 1}} WARRANTY DEED p LNELLRS GOUH f i rLR . ? 11 J / :. OFF,kEC.BK 76.52 PG :98 This indenture made the i`: day of AuSik," 1991, by GRAYMOSS, INC., a Florida corporation, whose post office address is 160 Olive Tiea`Clrcle; Altamaute Springs,. Florida 32714, hereina(ter called the Grantor, to ALLEN HUBBBR?; JONATHAN EPSTEIN and JAMBS W. COLD, their sue-rar ar tuccczzan, = truism an. tl c THg, CHURCH OF S=NTOL.OGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, whose post office address ix-6331, `Aol.17Vwd Boulevard, Suite 1200, Las Angeles, California 90028, hereinafter called thc• Graistet: Witnessetb: That.the Grantor, foi slid iti consideration of the:sum of Ten Do1Lra and other good and valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, conveys, remises,. releases, and transfers unto the grantcc; that certain land situate ilk, Pinellas County,. Fitivid'a, to-wit: Y kilo( (he 16116wing pioperty-loated in GEORGE, WASHBURN SUBDI:u1SION, aa>rectirded.iit Plat Book 5; Page 23, Public Records of Pinellas County; Eloisdac: Lots.1, 2; 3, aatl 4; LESS East 40 feet of the South 37 feet, West 100 t` S o? feet af.I -5, Natth 42HJeet of West 20 feet of Lot 6; West 20 feet IT" V ' of'tk , ALSO:- Tbe. Esst740 tees cf the' South 37 feet of Lot 4; Bast 40 feet of Lot 5; - ?;Soitcb-904ect-4bbe West 20 fect.of l:ot.6. AZSf f S 60 "- The Exit 1'J` &L-61 the. West. 30 feet of the South 125 feet- of Lot 6.. -- i br lYoah 15Ffeet:at the Eau 40 feet of Lot 6;. the North 73 feet of ;'fbc-west, 30 fc s of Lot 7; the South 42.5 feet of the West 30 feet-of =1 or' 3f=Y7tr Soak 42.5 feet of'the E=. 40 feel. a( tat 11. Thr E"f`-f {eet:ot the West 30 fectof Lot 11, thc. East 10 fact of the Wesi''30'-;feet af' tie: North 7.5 feet of Lot 6. w ` xicif identification. No. 16/29/15/94896/000/0010 ?ogcilt . ith.ail [he tenements, hereditament% and appurtenances thereto belonSing or in any w-lse.apperirining: Ta HiLve And to Hold, the ame in fee simple forever. Aad the Grantor, doex hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against tbc.larful- clams of. AlLpersons whomsoever, except: taxes for 1991 and subsequent years, inning ordinances 'and other restrictions and prohibitions imposed by applicable governmental authorities, and cbaditiom, easements, and restrictions of record, if any, with the understanding that this reference shall not operate to reimpose any of them. Full power and authority is granted to truster. 1, To improve, manage, protect, subdivide and re-subdivide the real estate or any part thereof; I. 2. To dedicate parks, streets, highways or alleys, and to vacate say subdivision or part Prepared by 4 return to: Paul B.. Johnson, Esq... Johnson k Johnson P. 0. Box 3416 Tampa, PL 33601 1 Af:_FI i s f f I:: 6t I• L! FI r: Qc' F.1 OF: f, "1f.tl I F 0 It ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Oil P?NELLAS COUNTY FLA. QFF,kEC,Fh 7652 PG 299 thereof; 3. To contract to sell or exchange; to grant optiour4o`purchase; to soli an any terns; and to convey either with or without consideration; 4. To convey the: real estate or any part thereat, too successor or Success on in trust, and to grant to such successor or 14ccelsen in tryst all.nf;lhe lisle, Male, p9Wvrs and 86lllgriti" vested in trustee; 5. To donate, to dedicate, to mort$.48t,ur'06cfwite encumber the reai estate or any part thereof; 6. To lease the real estate or any put thereof, in possession or reversion, on any terms and for any period, or periods of time, and to renew or extend leases on any terms and for any period or periods of time, and to amend, Fbaagc or:modify such leases and the-terms and provisions thereof; 7. To contract to make lea?es'and to grant options to lease- andoptioncto renew-leases and options to purchase the whole'or ai ipart of the revcrsioa, and to contract respecting the manner or fixing the amount of present nr fbiure Mu"; S. To execute ,gi. mts;of easements or charges of say kind;' 9. To Am, convey ouassign any right,.title or.5atere-st-ia or:'abo'nior casement appurtenant to the real estate at, any part thereof; la. Tn:dcal with title to,the.ieal estate and every parT thereof m any Way tad.-for such consideration as-would be lawful for any person owning-thetitl' toahe ieall'eslYlb to deal, With it, whether;limitai tdor different frOMA11C Ways above specified. In nocase shall any party dealing with trustee in.rglataoa fo t6?rea1._rsta(aorto ?rbom the real-estata„ni'any part thereof it conveyed, contracted to, be. sold {eased or mnrz;aged_by the truatec bit obliged to see to the application of any purchase. money;,mnl or moony borrowed or advaaci d'os the real elute, or be obliged to sec that the terms of.'t).e trwL-have beaacomplied: with be be`rtbliged to inquire into the necessity or expediency of any act of the truuee or be, obliged or privileed to inquire into any of the terms of the trust agreement. Every deed;.ttustdecd, mortgage, lease or other instrument executed by, truster in relation to the real estateshaiibe conclusive evidence in favor of every person relying on or claiming under any such conveyance. lease=orother instrument (a) that at the time of delivery thereof, the trust created herein aad', by the-trust: agreement was in full force and effect, (b) that such conveyance or other instrument was-.e.xceuted.in-aecordancc with the trust, conditions and limitations contained herein and in the trust agreemest or in the amendments thereof, and binding on all beneficiaries, (c) that trustee was duly authorized and empowered to execute and deliver every such deed, trust deed, lease, mortgage or other instrument, and (d) if the conveyance is made to a succcssor or successors in trust, that such successor or successors in trust have bees properly appointed and are fully vested with all the title, estate, rights, powers, authorities, duties and obligations of its, his or their predecessor in trust. % x a • PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. GFF . R2C , iii 7652 PG 300 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have xt their hands and teak on this 1 3 day of August, 1991. Signed, sealed and deiiverod STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing dccdA' rri°' trust was acknowledged before me by TER£N.CE J. McCARTHY as President of . GRAYMOSS, INC., a Florida carp r'ahon, as Grantor, on this 13 day A ttj???ggL' " Robert Johrti;on (Print acts ame) Notary PvbGc trtr of Noridn My Commission Eipires: Nt' Cmmvn siimt FiPim Nov. 11, 1945 DEEDS.- 3 A • s CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST MASTER DRAINAGE FACILITY CALCULATION SUMMARY April 2006 POND #1 EXISTING CONDITIONS: North Lot Franklin St.To Inlet 5,850 s.f. X 0.475 2,778.8 Impervious: 62,613 s.f. X 0.475 = 29,741.2 Pervious: 30,267 s.f. X 0.200 = 6,053.4 98,730 38,573.3 Cpre = 0.391 South Lot Impervious: 121,369 s.f. X 0.475 = 57,650.3 Pervious: 17,500 s.f x 0.200 = 3,500.0 138,869 61,150.3 Cpre = 0.44 Cpretri = 0.42 Assign Tc=1 hour Area= 237,599 s.f. 5.45 Acres. Qpre= 8.54 c.f.s. Qpre=0.42x3.73x5.45=8.54cfs (25 year, 1 hour event for City) PROPOSED CONDITIONS (Combined North and South Lots) Impervious Franklin St. In To Inlet New Flag Building Plaza, Walks, Asph Proposed LRH Hall Central Energy Plant Pond @ DHW Elev. 26.5 Pervious: ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 pLANING T C TNOF CLEARWATER 5,850 s.f. 63,244 s.f. 33,993 s.f. 74,000 s.f. 11,228 s.f. 9,679 s.f. 40,480 s. f. 238,474 Cpost x 0.95 X 0.95 = X 0.95 = X 0.95 = X 0.95 = X 4Y,9 s T* .'T 5,557.5 60,081.8 32,293.4 70,300.0 10,666.6 9,679.0 8;096.0 966714.3 • • CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST MASTER DRAINAGE FACILITY CALCULATION SUMMARY April 2006 TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED Water Quality Retention Required (SWFWMD): Volume = 237,599 x 0.5 /12 = 9,900 c.f. Volume Required for 25 year, 1Hour storm (City): Volume = (0.82-0.42) x 3.73 x 5.45 x 3,600 = 29,273 c.f. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r • POND #1 Slope 4:1 S.H.W.= D.L.W.= D.H.W. EL.= T.O.B. EL.= CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST MASTER DRAINAGE FACILITY POND STAGE STORAGE DATA April 2006 STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 22.00 3,819 0.0877 0 22.50 4,347 0.0998 2,042 23.00 4,906 0.1126 4,355 23.50 5,496 0.1262 6,955 24.00 6,116 0.1404 9,858 24.10 6,243 0.1433 10,476 24.50 6,768 0.1554 13,078 25.00 7,450 0.1710 16,633 25.50 8,162 0.1874 20,536 26.00 8,906 0.2045 24,803 26.50 9,679 0.2222 29,449 27.00 10,541 0.2420 34,504 27.50 11,382 0.2613 39,9851 TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED= TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED @ EL. = 26.50 237,599 S.F. 0.5 IN. 9,900 CF 21.00 10,476 CF 29,273 CF 29,449 CF ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST MASTER DRAINAGE FACILITY POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS April 2006 40 POND #1 VOLUME PROVIDED = BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. _ BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. _ UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. _ K= LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 10,476 C.F. 24.10 22.00 21.00 0.09 FT/MIN 134 FT 6 INCH POND AREA (SF) = 6,243 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 3,819 S. F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 24.10 6,243 2.59 0.53 2.75 0.94 134 11.35 3,119 275 23.58 5,637 2.06 0.53 2.75 0.75 134 9.05 2,800 310 23.05 5,031 1.54 0.53 2.75 0.56 134 6.74 2,482 368 22.53 4,425 1.01 0.53 2.75 0.37 134 4.44 2,164 487 22.00 3,819, TIME = 1,440 MINUTES TIME = 24.0 HOURS ORIGINAL RECEIVED APP 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN'i CITY OF CLEARVIATEP e r? 15- P.- 8 C„ - 1... : -%, :- _ L' egeG-, cant cte to be so? d, _ ? eazec,- or mc_rt:gared b. ` he _ G gib. ged tc -see tc the application xr?y pti chase rimy ten L za-:? mcnelr be rvaed ct 'advmncad:. ou the real estate f er be oblfge_d . to see that the t-ezrms o:f the trus T have been c_ Le wi or_ ob1.7 e to . in r into - : Z 1 Y.. the _nQces-s= oz e;cped_encg z a trees t _.flr -b? .i;3iaredrpr ?zi? c tie . t e : ; a-"_ the. trust ag= ement...: - _ Fve_ deed, _ tryst - .p :: a g ?le:3s;4 o.t.:othey rostrum ?t _ex ut d bY_Cran-tee ia_.resat ?= ?to'=,the ?'c3i es'tat? shall be eo*iclus Sze rsde rce . ra favCfZ of .every son rel?ZZng; cT? .or. claim mg under aTLy gxdh con?rey nce,.' -Le.-sue 4r . of a :y? strumeat. that Wit. t se ..time ::6± _ d`elsa ry ti+ sec f , the -- t rust `crewed _ h. and : by tie trust afire rl t; vas it 3 T.orca r; efp sect , . .( b } that such conveyance c-r .other nst_==e :t was e?cecutea i-i ac:ca dance with -the t t, comd tiaras aid l i-tdti.on-s canta ned heie:in and its the; - tru:S_t agreement c. I lm. the ameendme -ts thereof f And bid :ii-g an all clay es , - t. c j .,t kAt Grantee Wa-s duly auth-cr-4 L e:d and emnowe_red to execute and delsve:r ever such deed; _"t st :d :ed,' ?ease,. mcrtc to br aSher z - .. = ' the. conve.yarc-e is made. to, a succ-es.s:ar ar' suucce:a Z im trust s that such Successor ofi= s:uVuessors in t=, , at have been prope=ly appoin-ted' and are fu-l l y _ ves ted with all- the t is tle , estate, rl.ght s , powers r w thcritles,. dunes arid' abii-cations of its, hiss or their predeeess:ar it trust. N' WITNE'SS' W71=-OF; the Grantor has executed this deed under sea's on *the date araresa:id. S ,c7 e ,' siea-led and .deLiver.ed, in. the..p;s_nc e 0,1: T . J . .. H( LIYZY S , INC. - .i : t t,- ORIGINAL r ?? 2 8 20x6 PLANKING DEPARTMENT 'CITY In CL AR;?1/ATt: - • M EEC 3 Y V -? 1 L_L - Tr!is fi'n' E'I - - rra= __ v - •? , akafS.tTCCii ? v=Q:?ZS:Ct?T Sax 34-'ali n' u 1 - a , Thy 3:3 "?" - - tCa.E; G y=SC•m? L5 ...1tI F . ?r w. f4 iT'S ZI Sc i ys it -- err ? --- - -1 - _- - _-L': _; C_ Ecx T-4: jjt7i ?.- ,' Iy"5 F£N'TZin 13 Fs ?? ct 1 rx? ?v o ..:the 12Tws.. '.Cxf 'Lhe"` .. L?2 c?i', CT Z,r. Ft V1 C .,r`4..Il=iI1 TT?7CL- 7?Ge Of. S. I m the -=COL: li? Q. ? TYQ? T xS=? Sr ilfi7s'e ?Els ` C.11 S "'2 ??C'1iZSS. _"3 5s : -etYs?rg F`Tc?a 3F3? a 1wv P Osti.e, Box, x.. x _- - s = _. ? c??'--}+`II'?_,Z:e:€1 ? ;• Lr?3,S?Cv F L:`S 1,ITeCs liege if e z ca Le?2 t Gra a:t'r, a: P=AY r . a.T: ZX:.`...1 i-+-u'.?.Ll.i:?.y' -- T CgT1 0 mss' Irt' O? Cv R=CS OUIS:. TRU ,._ ratio'- rjcsL gr?? HE' 777 v23T E= YVsaao`c BouTeu=d, AZtc3e es? /?,/cTT.ST OTI1u?`:.i t3$;?rLe G=T i.:? t.eSee? _ ': .1 e GIIFis_Cf''???'ST,S>' t{3, - 4 Of ZED r`1II 33tfi 3':II Q04: :am V3 - ma-m- b F 2TT °°'.r eT: " T i?l t 7.7 4- e?T s =2m{ kwn3zti heby.r;st b a:?---?? scIs?x?x t}- rs s uTtn. T s s ? tz care - ?? sTla i,e^ y :tee Ts '"c ?x - : •T z•.. ? ? ?II-MATT L. z IZ :t . r' . and ZO f Lzss one ? ?:: f? o ? 9 ` :acts 9 bia F ori- 'C3G?;T3? ,with all t?= ?_??n'?Yts ,'. ?e ear L?n? ?s "ane -C ?mz=LA coax- OF REC RK &Z 14 _ _..-. ` ?, c?z?e-fie; , c r•?xc ?=d r..a be an; d, le-?se?. or . ma-??q?c ? as ' '? _ Cs rte° h ot? igeid tU _ s?_e tz t-te ang T fi a'a=,sr = o ZT-y pt=Za'se. Poneur_'. ... i n cz; aiarey o TM?ze -r adv sccsd ar.,? kse es. 3 ;2,. ar a a_e^_' t? sea ti-rZt t-he a f the naae aee_? eemgi = ? :r te is ax fie cr:-_Tted- t-c, Sl LZ1?&. iyL lt:he TMe^2rsa?LQ aC .2X'.2 E3IC?F F'= t2tm= Crtsa,. c= Le'_ aL.! ";ce a e?_:ge to it -? and . act ch£. .`_?ili5 _Qa. .d?°"r- 't?33t u"'taT'`n:TdC.e.y T-e:ase' c. o=hezT S_T?neat eXEC ::-II ?:z 33`' ^... T T °tai ";,...-cue .e°°-- ?' ?e ezcs- c?31?F ?'.IC?I C?stZ2Y?'c° r T6'??5? ?II= .. _ a.T:+' and Cam= 135?Il1Ile* E-'t-Si ?ZIai. fit Iris tLme, Cr:'deT?YeYf :iLie eCLt e .. 3Q=?-rnem= was aird a . ?.z:} .acn crave or ctn.e_ T:z?.: Mme it eras exe?=far . „z acearsee w; i *Se zs? :, cnzzr3:.? :ors and L??ta? ?ans C 'SQC _ ?.eT°_SY did:I..1 f the u"sTS} 3.?Leemen Q? 2Z ?3SE 3?ST4IIIET3.5. FFEL?rJ i r 223e Dri T 'LQ : a73 De#3E??"°S:r. ?. C } Tai • ?i 7Y?e 35 . u1 ,sn:_ Za. a3c r_em?.ower.2f? to execL'. e and d?_"ve eue surri' , a?e? r L'L -' Qe° I-ea`Sc Q2 ..: ] t t'Ye? ?.3S a3d. .. tTE s^S3I1Y ZIl.E°? - II3QE ta'TS \rs1I?L Sz`iCL.:: .z1c-eS v_.S LL. LTSStiy 1ITLt.;• TY TLD?-TZTt°?i• 53G7 S1ZCC SS '.Z a= TCC°°s?5+7`LS_ ?Z`.'?TSSt have been pznopeT' Sl ° i-4-2-1 F:er°? :d ?L' 3? k c}5? t? 2 x 'mac 3 ?? r T Cuts ? T74! ? t Li1?ZlQ' ?tin u?7r=??°5; F??C4 , Qf"yQcilaSTS Gam: ?1 1r C^E ?T zx j*--Mq `S's NIliza tae C-i3-_rtc^ 2zaa e`.Xec,, tad, sz__ aIs L-al uzwz e a reze? sz~?',ac e a2 k_uezd L 77 ?z c > h, BY e t-a; lyi' T s'? f r c?--= `` ? Ar2g=de22?. Bcx 3:2+_5 P. a r .ORtGt J _= 3 PLANNI bOARTMENT on, • a Tiis instriment was-prepared by and return ta: ec_.?Sc?°_ JLY 3--`T na. 3.:960 .. 06u7 5?:;: ?II??I•???I:?III??I?jIII?.??I.N?(T?)UL?I?r??J?? . Ra3.LRT E.-:r"ol-R iSON, ESQ. Broad and Cassei - 100 North Tamtra Street 6CcPEbid 07 999 i-fi; - - 0o-ol"aaoooa- Sui:te 3500 ?ED-ei;taESi:. ;• FfiCDi DIllG OQI. ?Alic ! .. SysOQ Tampa, Florida 33602 9.aE'STt111 e. txe2'_:A 7 :sx 3'?0. :;t; `. ?: v: cia7f11 tcc? 45 k{F3lt9i 6 '4 9 propeEty ?APt2tse. s- .? ? _2 s Para.STdentifcahon.No:IS/2x/15/54-50/01 2/0050 TI ? "?- rifghlrE r <? G jS,pa:ce A.ba-ve Tliis.Line fo17;T2ecotiT?n W :R R.k N T Y D E E D (>ST4VrL ORf!I 0RIk1 s?CTiorr ass T, r s.>° r J H his I1xtlentcx're made this day of1?1 1999 t3)L>ti tY1A1ZLL+S I t It bG a 'Flor!da• •cvrpo.ration, `whoso cost of ce address is 113' E. Jefferson Str t Orlando oP Cf c Chunty of ORA1v. E, State xi "FL 3: 01, Grantor, and YLARY SATII F iS; GLEN S I'ILO, 3 AA CITNTN GRAM, CAT) IZ.24E RINEDER and 13El N SHAW and their sa.ccLSSOis Ts 67ae:TRUS I`3??S QrTR"T CR-,O 1.CH O SCIENTOLOGY RaLI.Gk.QUS TRUST, a rlgr3dn corpocarioia;, aihose.??bst oinci address i's' I 18 N' Ft- Lamson Clearwater, ? L 3401:, Stat?af FL Gra ite'e. Grantor purhhas.edtthe below descnbed land as agent for lie Grantee. Grantor's purchase was made with the In 't`:irr transfer-ll)e oela:w described property to die Gt'an'tee and . it was purcilased exclusive y with die• GLaptec.s funi s. Grantor's funs were not used in the on anal Purchase and oo monetary considemti.oh.has .passed between Grantor and' Grantee oeitaining to this. instruinear- ' ITNTSSE -hat said Grantor, for auii'in cnusidreation ofdie siren of TA N GlVb ooLl.0 (Sl o.oo?_Doilars and other good and valuabie considemcions to. said Gi.aaLor n? nand glen b4KSa?o ranEe Oat receipt whereof is hereby aclmowledgcd, has granted, bargained and soPd to ll?e sai?!?rante . isad Gcantce s hells and assigns forever, the fallowing: dcsc abed land sr:mate, ::Tying a`nd bzrsig 1r"r 'QuLi L SS County, lot da, to wtf ; u!", ( f ilex ) OT S, BLDCIC I Vf2.C.NOLIA ?'ARK, ACGOZ024G 1Q" T-1-1-LP 1'L'A'f RLC EI 1 'OF ON,, rrf z L{ Tm O r , U, QT TEE,: CLL3t7? Olr rIFT C-MCU T os: COURT IN AND FOR Pfi1Y1 LLAS Cf wry -ri-TA a- 131 EOl2l S 1 F Lr_AT . TNT BOON{ r. P4.GL".74, SAM LA -DS S.=. TE L. YBY -N-D AS °E Z t`(ot?(TY IPLO12lTJz?. 3 s " *, 1vC2't _ ?,imenr?ry7?: f?,t P/C ' r LI2QPT RT1 FS TOT TLOi1tEST1 AD ag ad peo ?reolS?+r?llas. Counry,• TnT and said. brantor does kreby- My warrant the tit- to said land an?? ?LZ l cC tfe game tY&? ?lfa? r t? laaufu?*claams of all. perspns whomsoever. t .. Grantor" and lane„" are used or singular or plural as context ie?uii. 4 ?3 u Ia k'icness Wlrereaf Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and sea F the uay afid year -iF&t above. ttea: "G Sled le ehuer mourAres rice: NLUUKWE,ST T1iC_ n r Marne ? j` ORIGINAL Sheila. RainQn;:.Pr-side it. RECEIVED - TI8 E: ?eiicasdn S.tre t,' a Nara : Orlando.,-E, 3??80 i JUG. 2 8 200 sor FLO?_? ya t ... = PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY e-F isf CITY OF CLEARWATER. 'Nile foregoing instrurizent was acImowledged b"efa> ? .nip. ttus. 2 day t t{ 14 9 by Sheila V. Ramon, who is person< 1"7} - na_wn. to me gl produc t as id'ent -Eanon and dsd n ttalcs an oath r 5 qy CozninassionExplzes' t _ 0??. 1170•_-f ? ? - •.y-.: MY CAMMIS}70N?(_,,^9792: - 3 '- ?,srn- _xr.a;s:?g?:,m= D ?t a,,:s'?e?tat sYai?oe-1>?au?e N?TARY i- • O=' I 3U 'IF J iC 32:7 l;:l C?'.? ,1I if!al.K fiit: .t: -2 SCS Illrll(ill`lll??lllili?fi111(lfl1 _ ?[rn7?y.?a?cf}nt DX 9174F - K?5 R1,•iC - - d? tc i 'rZS9S? o'"ieavar 1=ri3z:?af-°?:aavsrsfu*, ilia a!.t7?:? . Cis =30. Court Street FI/C SP -A 2of r, TG • Made ?tis,??y ..01 byte CITY OF CL EA AT ER - '4 Cf. w-'. FLORIDA i a. 7{urtic?aal_=C roc>afart x ihe Sta,e• of itc-rlda., rre cfier }[ed the `Ctanfh d:TJ:lY , r- ?L i 1 D oG: H { s i s C7E c Ii! '?G?R, -? cry-sG?E E. ?JLOG`ir R= I GFO U IS uridi uir cover ar,a _ AID ar1tV tC Gt??_CQnscZv: S2,_asa;,._2r?C:liT1Der, or C?t CrNls CSci ?.E ?d uiSL.CSyc Gt ut12 "Qa{ LTf.O:O?^?t ' YUnC?4c POSt; uTS3C8 3dIIF?5S;":18., ??'-vCQfII?i 'GaG?lE?} rlil°i7L?E; C?$=?]ttnt2r -10rICa,` J.S (':II, ? tara:G2:?.?T' Ca1rE? c??e" •'' '" - _n•Granfee ., (Ytiharx,+er useQ:hazaci',Ne::iar_t.,=zar and"i;,acYe4';nd[?dsaa;tx:?a[t?s;ta ia•i? Vtnent art:-7ae ixirs;.leLal'. lives ar_' 23sig7s cVmCMdLaa,. znd ft, . i art. ?Jgrmd. lrnesse , that thm aranipi, for and irr.ovris? ration Gf S1'-4.0.0 and` oisie,- valaabl.e consideraucr_?s,• M^2 i>;t urrn~eat is he e?y aclcnnvEecged,..tcev. eranfs, b airs. falls aliehsmiseS t 1eszs : ccrr ys and con ..: urata e ranted all ct ;fo o uiria?arals or-,3i crnaery sn aia in ?relias Gormfy F{anca' VIZ- Lot 8., Stock t?,. MA.GI OLiX. PAP"K. tUSDWVIS10N. as_record.ed in Ptat,Bbok a, Page 4'3 ofJhe pubRec3,ds of_Plli* as ccun - L}ai-;lorrda;. _ -AXD- A pardon of Se.^ o9-fiS, Tcwcns;-dp 29 S.cu h, Ran.a;e._..a.:9. Eas ,,more_ part5cuiar{;y described as From €he int-_-t. ,Ion 'af the Morfh_righ#- it y of Caxtzt Street and ?h.e cast ngbt oz-way of South Garden. ?kvea ie, m= €ast 1-jo reef. fd a RiA i ' of Beginning; taxer s- fes; Hurt easferlx 30:0.; _ .. _.. :. thence Ezst ;$ feet along rrarikiiQ: Street; th-enca Sar thwestedy a . fit; the West ? Safeet.ato<>?g -buft.S:i::eat-to the P'orntof Beginning - Tcaeti -? u`G ?-niermerts; hereditmmerits arid aoourter;ances ther-etc orr ng or; acs !janyvuisa 9 ` To l-aare anal fi? F?c, ?C::sane ?zr-?.ee. s?mDte inreaEr_ Sc je f fo raoz ingUe tii as v?icren ?xes.and car eft ins dl.me ms of ,pec,al assessments rot yep duei'.aclc part tq hic?ways, -rgnrs-=ar wzy, ;icanses easements a'nd restz icaons: of'recoH ae e l mrd"iic ?- arau2izce?; other aavem emt:imita or.. And e rzd GrarrtQr noes spe ;; llp warant L`?e •ti ie.te;said-land .anal-wiil.:daIand the sar?e`aaCmsU th Ec _ taus -O atE as ; ,fmii g ?4+ ?traricn =br under Granter es ce t tax, e? for-the -year 2001-and.: s?bse??Ent;.and` sub?zv to i-ic m? a ? l?ereirrcau:e r;e iioned_ •_. _ . - - . . - leis irstmmnt was nraarcd ay_^,nrl__Cuir la: 2 ROT3L'ibT E. ;OlTic50T?, _sQ_ [ ?: ?.:S :U,--z COUNTY 3raad :nd c-;.<r. 3K L034::P6 c'4077 . OFF. RE-- 1'D(1'*ianltTanna Street . Suitt '.00"? ?. TenTz, ^adda 3:6,'12 _ ?i S • -j -t-^ln '2 ?- ot:?o-??tel ? x ?ra:o?- ?ttolx? PrnPc-ry Apnraisvr '9 i sE 450.OD DOC STW - DR Parccl i6cniii'maiosi twos 1v/?J%1 /TE6410tJ0130 7IIIpt sEMSe_ao 1Sb19/T SIS44SO1011002'0 x? Wj.,DWa:. 41,0%%A0 llsP. int `?OT "C?D?LYtn? D.a??"? ..,... _ Do34ep _ y-- R R X- Z Y D L D (S -L AiL-I'CRY FORm &ECTION .6s9. a'!,.F. 'a'nts hxclrlttxrr n-ad? +hu Yom` .d..}• QGC>Y3tt,_ .ZzJ.9R ae a?tce-t TSIL :th?LIZ,i??iGV ?1TLC?\ \l - 1L=D CRC35r -0r?tttd and. eastinb, and"c.tlicla. of.'thc JnttedStatsaL Ame ea, ?Qnnse xastE ac_'.' . darrsc is 4?Tt 77th :5:? ?<t .N ri nC_thcX,4C1i.X7F aT T',"v. r"F ?xcf,-z?ct?rt., ? . , x?Ya( nCt?tS' Lo' 'C?nta? and the C3_ILlRC1I OF z?..I?i?l i?C-S!--c'2S'---=?i8L?5 T-,2??ST 4 u nnsc'nnst_nLhc aodress,ts t D S.t.:t IIamsnn, IZS, Clcacl?..tc„ .of, tftrCotmcy a P1NcLUkS, State-of lI IT LSSETII;, i n t sid ?irntac.:fiir ar d m' consiiic 3iian at ,hc'"sum of AND 00/1t0 ? .(S?Q'OQ):DollSrsand`difici•soiid•and`vatti3btcc5nstacaunnsto.aid?Gcacdcin hand x`i?'S?`said''G'rnicc,. _ the rc ipt +«h¢ sf is 4cshy ac-mailcdg? us y?nte3; ha Qaine zna soi6'in thcmid C-mmcr; and" Cmn. =-s haa:and acsi-cns fomcvc<, the fdllmving iznd siti:atr, lying and bcin; in PI II LI-hS totaua; to wu: '. ? t ?"' Pmt ? t a ?:. a. I:iROL7L'II .d I`CL;ISit't' .;IiLOCn , . i ? ``j`? ?U 6, T•-. COSIR t SQS;iAR'E, lam- IF IN TQ t,L 1'-LAT T=FO. [XF-C07tD;£D:FIY ^LAT I3?.di> a P CF. C? F-., OF 777E !TUC 12r.COTt=EmS [7?FLL.LS CC]LJih i'1', n^-OITIP.,., T 3 I CST ?. AI OCI? L' TY tC NC[ I TASK,. A?CO DIi?v :TO TEUEF .:I LeT " -m- I-F-R 0TZ IZS ORRJFI) ;'FA PT i'T RCOK . PAGE- 4a OF TTF.: PUBS YC ?\ ? ?.T, kECO;ILT15 Ot PIti r t AS:COL `":'7I, ..u?P':L' ?. : _ "` cr.U -: ?? 1IT'r I`ROtiRTl'IShaT?I:C111IS%AD. \ and said t,ratar Iitcs itc ci,}' fu[Vy ?? rant ";tic title {n said land, and will defend the srmc;a??airst :hc :a: t:ulciaims..aiall acsrns erect claiming 7y, hnou.gh or under 'the Grantor_ ??{ M N ?T_ This insirurr=t was amnarcd b anti. c!uia to: .. .RGIIS':L: _IQUhS07h.=ir. -_ _ ?i?7ci=5 CGINTY rl. 3road ?n i Ciao! OF- . Rr , 3K L03ti PG 2407 Inn Naah:nro. Strcc: Suite ?sao '''? . Tamni, F?arid: 13GC2 - 9t'_SZCHL '-c?1-L°96 Ia-55. OL E3 ?ld2C{ sROGY t6..CQ . Property k-- IIr11SCr'S.•?''??...V 10CTILA" - Mii j Sd,.C:C.CO Parcel idcntiucatioa NaS i 29/15/I S54'fi10?1!01.30 arxi U e%_60 ?;{Z9/l?/541501Qt?IQG3fl -c AhT.Tineas: sa,0%..oo ?? ?L3. Gam- CrGruc: t, 00 ''.,??„o:ew• viz Pa `-..•$Spaco Above This Line for R`cardin; Data. Y I'L L D (Si CT uTORY.KCiRh(-Sc CI ICf'tV 689.E3, F.S) _ 7 h i z - i n tcrmure.madcthis 1St day o tip- b _ 1999bcittc=t tc k i N T r 1C ki4 N.,',T1G; I_ ILTD;.•C1?L-'ti$; 6f!_ ti7zd and existing und. the taxi a(the United States of Amen=, whose post aftiec add~ss x .3 7th Ste==*. N. J.. of 1ftcX,Yo=x of .'D_v M? :ux<h-ngton, <imntar, and the CIivicil OF SCI4'x rIII:O:C; 4 itr'" iGIIIt'S'RLC S, menn§.c qii afGtc_ address is ZTD S. R. Harrison, V1 i , CleanxZte:r, dI'ihc Couno/ af?TNM_1_ \S,.Statr of TfifiLSS2-711, %nm mid Grantor, fnr. and in consideration of the sum aC7MEtN AND Q01I00'S . (5`1G O65Dbilar5 -and athcgood and eiluabie.carrsidcratmns to s id Grantor in Viand y^dby:caid .Grittcc, thr:rtccipt whercof is ;icrohy ac nowicd -. has o ntcl 'bar?aincd and said to the said Gcantec, and .Cr.icheirs and assigns Cornier, the follmt ng dcsr.'hcd land situate, lying and being in FINE 1.1cS ?, aunty, ilanda, to-wit: 1,07S G TUROUGti iG INCI; MVE, I32 OCK 17, CO.UR,7 .SQC1An, ACCO s OF I I L R Tbi:L•T.'C'3I,IC2 COI. SOF11I 1L.A.SSCOUNTY, FI.O n_, ' r:XC;F; ' LOT 7 3LOCIi _1` ?tAG\pt ia1 Tlttzn, tCCOIt3I NNG TO' TC,IE I'.L lI T TIEIYL•'OF RTeOI213FD L t T L lT I30OT( 3, F.1:Gi 4 OF ?iPE PU:I3LIC `l~ ibFCOR1IS OF F[' EI I.kS CouN-r`<', ZOL2I?rt. TILe PROPERTY CS NOT fICTKIES'LAIl, -. Icrr.?t ??/jam. , and mid Granter does li&c17} ItAll; warrant the title to said land, and %vill defend the s-atc against the lawful claimscn all nctsrnis rtirro,e.e yc, da itni.rta by, t'hrauah or u 3.n nde'r he Gin tor, ?1 "Gentor and "C ranic° are used far singular 6r plurai, as coni at rcpuiccs. In %%7ft:ncss TrcrctiC, Grantor figs hcrcunro sc! Omntnr s lend and scat the day and yc¢r lin •- ' ,. abdre written. - ,- _ Sa3>'C32OSS' S ci >w]cd;anil dciivccd in ottr prescncc AI'v1FR.1'C_in ?R47-70 F?nt'Aornc D:orra I d Ec _+tf•1'te'r MP; 7N, 1Rol-b` D rarsoD= 1 - ?S, V Faent, :,..finance r? u °rintcl''?Vmc::Trin;a 'R_. ;f?k8rson . - _ ?-1 `irca rag 3rtcY`azmcnt ti a5 cf.-0 -1 d ..J }i- ar_ nc htvl dzy cif F - 1' 3A ay ?w J CrEw ?5?? ? as 1?jC ?1=?. ?r? - tz oC the AM_ 1C 1N r 1( ?.?1. -cmii;"(?,'.S''S', to i of mktrnativ known to me or nreiducd id ! MH) 1_ ' idcufi,...tinr and d did mot t.-i, annaih. f/ _ Ml yCamminsion iaiics?iYE"=}."` .?. .. _ _ ,-?- -- _ -- Pamir{?,1ync3orstamcreds.:.•int A ORIGINAL. RECEIVED I :JUL 2 8 2000 PL MNIN CITY OF .CLE4j to 0 N : =??. ,;• 0q_2?2?0? JLY-?0- 1000 INE__. S:` C? a o 46Pn _Q7 F1(3 55 1111111:Illllulll1111I11,11181111fifINIII111I1 '83s This fhstrument"u?n$.iiiz.Ij:nL d by and return to: %G22€51c' U3-30-1999 ;4€;04 S55 15 'IZODEI-T.F';:IQ.Fii 51._14 ESQ. Ol *0000660, J. F. IIroad ahti-Cassel PCA WLE„INC RECORDING 002 +OGFS' 1 $10_50 100 North Tampa ,teeet gOC 5TA14P. - ?R 14 3 s-70 S:Uite 3500' `'?. ;.; RECAAO' FEES 9 $1.00 Tampa, Floriila:33602 TOTAL; sicEo CASH: All T- TENDERED; $, fiQ P CHEY ANT. Tf 14DERED, $13.60 Propcry A,ppraisac's HANGE: 3'.00 Parceh!Id:entineatio??:II*to:?, _ , (Space A bove Tlds Line for Recordings Datai WA A R R .,A 1? T I' D E E D (STATUTORY FORM - St, CTION 629.02, RS,) fh This Tutlei>hrr.e:made this. day of 1999 EE SEEN W.LE, INC., a Florida cohporntio l"'. whose post office- address: is: 326 1" ? ?.enue North;:. S't. Petersburg, of the County of 1- iNEr I AS, State loV. i+L 73701, Grantor, and ;MARY SALT1YaS, GLEN E. ST-ET-0 $,k2 CVNNINGRAMC'ATI- IRIi E RINDER lmd MEN SHAW ax-id thair successors as the TRUSTIQgs Olt `l:TII:•CIIT1R Q "S'CmNTOLOGY I2ILIG16TIS TRUST, a FlOtid;[ corpora io:n, whose post o12address is 1 18 ?I 'Ft. IIan-ison, "Clearwater, FL, 31615 State ofFL,. Grantee:. Grantor.purchased the li ;low,describod land. asagent for .the Grantee. 'Grantor's purchase was made with the intent to transfer the below descrllaed hroperry' W the Grantee and it was purchased exclusively with the GtAntew's funds. a',ientol s filnds w ece.T dt used i the oi'igina'1 purchase and na monetary consideration has passed between Grntorand'Crantcepdr-T imrig`tothisinscru en t. A ml. IT^TI SSxLI LIta.S said Grantor,: for and "in consideration of the slim of TLN.r1ND 0011U0'S . (510.00):Dolllrs and other gpQd and valuable considerations-to sa4d]Geantor in, hand paid l y said Grantee, the iece115i'.whereoi' is ]Zeraby'actchowledged, lies granted, bargained and snl'd to the said Grantee and Grante s heirs and rise s"forayer ilia following described land situate, lying and baing in P1IalELLIS, r?l LG?t?U County Florida to ?yal 1(///111`/ - € - n+.? See Atlaehecl 3ciaed.ule "A" ? NT Int?nyd'de Tex f';! Sa lawn. F .Dc I. ill, .CI©rfc, ?Inanklo C?unh• vtrr - T TI, I'IZQ.#?IiT'Y TS NOT IIDlv1i S IE ` Clepuq o,d< 3EV "'and said-Grantor dogs hereby fully warrant the title- to: said land, and will; defeno the same agtsinst the lawful claims ofall persons, whomsoever. "Grantor anal 'Grantee" are: used for singular orp ural, as, context.requires. Ill XIIElless 'yV46reof, Grantor has ihcreunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. ' ORIGINAL RECEIVED , JUL 28 2006 S STATE .&T Pi in our presence: IAA , . 'i?I.,E? Ill C. BY; Terence;fi. NfcCat-thy, Pueside;it 225 3".' Street Nardi St. Petersbun- FL..3370I PLANNING DEPAW-1w,-LN CITY OF CLEARWf?iER the fereoniing Trmant was aclahoa ledeeti before . mr this 2? d.1Y of 3 1?f 1949 b fTerenee I. McCarthy, "wh is persot all own to me or producezf as identrfieation a a 'did nott e n'aath. My Gnmmission Ex txg!s.•' i ioftrv Pu:hlic ?-- Tiac(e T[evltio ?1?E 1 ?1:>?? ?: , ?nAr i?;coraMtPENrcca ai'??iaes Printed, typed oh stamped name Sol uw+ eE urc. {{s?7F i i= i u +n'Sxo wir a e ' iPAtl/iEiLc"1119290.1 19aBA19001 )2&/99 O°-252294 JLY-3D-1999 3;44pn plt_LAS GO 9K 10507 PG lcc^31 :? SS Illllil11111l111I?II(1?1111lIIIIIIt1lIQ`lillllll Tits instrument w_s prepared by and relur i to: ROBE ?T-E. JOF•NSON, ESQ. EGPPSfi,i o7-30 1993" 15:4?:Si Gss Broad. td-Cassel QED-4E5TCQi IHC RECORDING 002, PAGES 1 $10.50 100 i:Vogth Tampa Street -DOC STAMP - DH213 3 5.20 Sidfe 1400 REUR0 FEES 9 $3.;H Tatnparrloiida 33502 TDTAL: $14.20 ` GASH AMT. TENDERED: 114.$5 Pro' ei_ a',7id ser's CHAHGE. 5,05 a c 1=lelcatio.M1.o; Is-pace ?bo've This Line for Record ug Data] R,' R- A N T IF D E? El D: (STATUTORYIrt3 •= SECTION 689.02, I+.S.) This .Ti06 ffif made: this day of U1999 BL vtrN VESTCO, IIYC, a Florida tsrpornhon, whose pdst office addres$ is 1920 9 i Street North; It. Petersburg; of the County of PINELLAS, State .of FL 33 701, Grantor, and ti1ARI SAUNA , GLEN E: STILL, SARA CiItIIIINCII l1 CAT137;ItTN RIIIIIl It anil I3EN SI Wand then successors as the TRUSTEES OT.TITL CISITR?tT''all SGIT IVI OLOGY Tt LIGTOUS IRTIST„si Ilbrid'a corporation, whose post office aadress is f 1',8 N. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, FL 34b15, State of FL, Grantee. Grantor purchased the bL?l:Ow describedclaiid as agent for Elie Grantee. Grantor's purchase was made with the intent to transfer. die 6eTo:w described: property to the' Cianl'ee and.it-was purchased. exclusively with the 'Grantee's fiords. Ciraiifoi' s fund$.:were not used, in.the' original"purchase and no monetary-.-consideration has passed between CFa'aj rand cHintee:pertaining to this instmrnent. 01 RECORDI140 WITA? TII, That sand-Grantor,:: for and in consideration oft the sum of TEN AND 00/1-9013 G ($10:.00 Dollars and other good and valuable consideraaons.to said Grantor in. hand paid by said Grantee, 06 [NI We recent whe'r.'eof.is hereby aclmowledged, has gianLed, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and 1 dESa?j.. Grantee s heirs ard'.assign s forever, the. followln tlesc,ibe3 land situate, lying and being in PINELLAS MTr GoUnty; Fioriaa;"#a-wit: Pic Ulf See.Sch.edule "A" Atta.clied Tczi{ = Tim 1?' 2 1??IlT;Y IS NOT HOMESTEAD: olaims ofiaH: ii%sbns whomsoever. "Gcantor''.`and!;'?Gi anl'ee" are used for sin.guiar or plural; as content requires. Tu :Wiiiiss;ljrei:aof, Cantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand: and seal the day.and year first Signet}, scald rid eltvdre;d in our presence VEST-CO, INC. erene e 7 McCarthy, Presideiit 225 Yd Street North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 going instrument was ar-knowi ged before me this __a'-'day of ORIGINAL The Wz 1 1 1999 by Teience J MCCartliy; wl o is ersoLial'lyknown to me Or produced RECEIVED as dentifc2ti on a' d d noL talc a 'oath: .FI! 1L 2 O O 200dl 6 MY. Comm .iss omi Expires .J lJ Public P? `x Ttaaie Travlna t a ??.> PLANNING DEPARTMENT ?' 00MMfss10N- 0e tatgp XPIAEs Printed, typed or stamped name CITY OF CLEARWATER4.k..9?o"?i.;?E rQoUni5ht5ry;faxF'.r1,i? .... Q- -- ntr nyVtBie Ta_ Pd _ ;: lEa?leen, (`,Oo ©1? „`'I. r Pinoflas Gou"(y FPA71rEplEST]9291 y? - - -' 'iassv+ioaUi 7i18n?9 00twlir clam vintid Name ?? t1 .rfrj t .,st`kTt ov.RLA.7i m:4 COVNT o'r=? ,:tee 1.I S *. J ?E/290:6 15._30 PAGE 02 - . = 7`27a^5; 7v - ^.:-447-74 DEC-2 ORDINANCE NOD- E83S-01 a_ C-Q ex :,ode ?c Qa= f B?iF.>1111`!?V?I ?Nlttll?ll?;?iR1?(?fi AN ORI3iiVANCE OF THF= CITY Or CLEARVVATER , FLO;R'1t3A, /ACA- N:C THE 15-FOOT ALLEY LE1CA7 i0 ADJACENT TO 7,t-4E EAST PROPERTY LINES: OF i::OT;; d _ -? Ti-irRU.Ll.G.4 'l.O CTF CC)l1R'i- .S.QUARF 8UBQIV_tSj,0K; THE D . 15-F007 ALLEY . L` IXG ADJACENT 70- THE. -NORTH 5 PROPER-T UrNES OF LOTS 11 THROUGH 14, OF SAID COURT .-SQUARE, SUBDIVISION; THE 157RO.CT !-ALLE-Y LANG ADJACENT TO THE NORTH PROPERTY LWEs• 0;= _• R LOTS 3' THROUGH BLOCK f`Z, OF 5AI'D 'COUR - ? 10 - SQ AR-t 5GBDi1/ISION t1ACATl.NC THE 3 FCCST CYTILiTI' ?4? .. EASEMENT. LOCATED -.. AD,IACEN7 T' O. :THF _ VVEc 17 PROPERTY LI E OF LOT 1, BLCCK 12, OF NiAGiV-aLrA PARZK SUB:DI0810'N -INCLUDING THAT PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEhAE:N, WHICH EXTENDS SOL.ITH TQ THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF t_QT 1'6. E:LOCK i2, OF SA-.j;:0 - - cduR:T. SC7UARC.. SUt3DIVi!SCON; AND VACA7NG THE fZ i4tV:CULAR. RIGHT OF=VFA.Y EASEMENT LOCATED T TKE NOKTiWVEST CORNER Q:F .LOT T6, B:LDCK 12, OF SAID COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION; PROV101N.G AN 01HEREAS, CnurCh cf Scden10l09,y Religious TPUSt, nwn5r of real property aejoining the aflejrs described: herein, has ragtussted that the City vacate the alleys, utility emsernent and right-of-way easerrrijemt depicted in Ekhlblt A attached ho-rnto; and WlHeR 'S, the City Comrn'I s on finds that said. Mlays; utility aasament and ri.ght- of way are not necessary for municipal use and it is deemed to be to t;`r:e best interest of the City and the ger.erW p:ubffc that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE 'IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE C-rrY 0' CLIAR:WAT'ER, FLO:RICA: SggVo , 'I. Th:e following, -- ------ ee cx: Pf A ??g-Descnptror.., attaC td : ereto is hem-ty va'cated, zloed and released., and the City of,learwater release's all of k's right. tiu.'a -and interest thereto. Section 2.. The City Clerlk shall record this ordinance, in the p:ubl}c rezc.rds of Ptneilas'County, Fiorlda, foltoWng adoption, Section, 3. This ard.inance shall take effect immediately upcn adoption. 1 1 Clydi?anca No, 5L39••G1 'ORIGINAL RECEIVED .-JUL 2 8 200s PL4NNI1VG LEF CIN OF CLE , l?" elyr 'WATER 05/08/2006 15_30 -72744571 Y t-;,s .7?: 7_:s't^,rt:C{TY CCC';?DdF'. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 04 " ,:SLCle IN mr 1QQA - ? INE"AS CFF.RE.t".,9K COUNTY r!_R 1174a PG '25-ES This is not d sttf?,el 7 5 F ^ D 2 3 1 4 12 .11 r- I j 6 ?`asern ?n f ?t?ca bons .?- T EET FRANKLI} Re r es e 8y Appl?co?rf S R 1 G RT w. .5 6 7 Li 8?z_ J g 3 a.t 2 3 > T N , N 7\Ns N, _ p 15 , T4 T3 ' 12 Ill T.;' F 11 12 ? T ?; - , ? ? 4 J ???oY?: REUr,?DU5.1RtlS' ? a6-sv??se reea- ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL ----2 8 200 '._ PLANNING CITY OF CLEARWATER V ?l 1 smR3?70??1 1 ?u^C G, L c9- fl3/1999 21 7275 EC-- PAGE aL -o F T C EARW AT E R Pos7 Osncz BaY 4748, CLWw;k-_z, RowDA33758-4748 ='1 LQvl?? TELEPHONE (727) 562-47/50 Fix (727) 562-¢755 'rte ALA f+, i, Pueuc Wow ORIGINAL RECEIVED September 3, 1999 2B06 Mr. Richard Ranck, P.E. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Markham-Stukes, Inc. CITY OFCLEARWATER 11007 North 56 h Street, Suite 210 Tampa, FL 33617 Re: Church of Scientology Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counsel Center Dear Mr. Ranck: City Public Works Administration staff has completed review of the supplemental traffic analysis prepared in August 1999 for the subject project. This update to your origin4l traffic impact study of August 1997 is acceptable, and we concur with the Original conclusions as .updated. The concern -regarding pedestrian rtiyity is addressed by the relocation of the cafeteria to the proposed new buildin and t? v walkover on Fort Harrison Avenue. Should either of these items not occur, further evaluation and review will be necessary. r; }ncerely. }r?hael D. Quillen, P,E. ,£sastant Director of Engineering oc: R-4h Stone, P1ann:n9 Dir:c;or Mike Gust, Traffic Operations Engine--r `t {C ?lv :-P`?, v;:C wLtYCn-CCMMiSSiCv,? `? j G? i?,?..i',`?C.K•;IS;SC?SS zC'd ?_;.? ?". l.:xulS.i:C. _. 4 L.) L V J TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1 ADDITIONAL SERVICES J CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARWATER, FLORIDA J J 1 Prepared for: City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 South Myrtle Avenue 1 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Prepared by: Markham-Stukes, Inc. 11007 North 56 h Street, Suite 210 a Tampa, Florida 33617 August, 1999 i Approved by: Richard F. Ranck, P.E. Florida Registration #45978 I' Introduction and Study Area This technical letter serves as a supplement to a traffic impact report that was previously submitted in October 1997. In that report, a detailed evaluation of a new Ministerial J Training and Pastoral Counsel Center and associated parking garage for the Church of Scientology in Clearwater, Florida was conducted. Additional office space and the addition of a cafeteria is proposed. The parking garage that was originally proposed on the northeast corner of Court Street and Garden Avenue is to be relocated eastward to the southwest corner of Franklin Street and East Avenue. Direct access to the garage would change from Garden Avenue to Franklin Street This supplemental analysis stems from a meeting with City staff in which task items that would address these proposed changes were discussed and agreed upon. The results of our analysis and our conclusions and recommendations are summarized below. Figure 1 shows the overall study area. Figure 2 shows the project vicinity in greater detail. Trip Generation The trip generation of the original center was detailed in the October 1997 study. In that report, trip generation was based on applying ITE rates to each unique component of the center. Two changes to the original land use are proposed which differ from the original report. • Expansion of the corner towers of the center, resulting in a total of 306,300 square feet for office use. • Addition of a cafeteria for on premises staff only. J I 7 Because the cafeteria is designed to serve only church members and representatives within the building and not to the public, no additional trip generation is anticipated for this use. Additionally, the cafeteria replaces an existing facility that is located off site. By providing an on site location, pedestrian traffic is anticipated to be reduced. Approximately 300 to 400 people who now walk would use the cafeteria inside the facility instead. Table 1 summarizes the additional trip generation values based on the description above. As in the original report, the office space was treated both as a Corporate Headquarters (ITE code 714) and as a single tenant office (ITE code 715) for comparative purposes. 1 1 e 0? A r { Y' r 7 ST ^r ti O a;< 6 gTERRAC_-R <;, G, {? CT 7R F 3r s - L AR ..Ir;e $AMU I M. RC&.vSCN AIRMONT L'A`? _ t'AOs S-7 $ PAn PARKWOOD >..._"v.'>. 1? ALTERNArrv_scHool _-SIB<' c RE EST. RSHA,L .?Es r ` WOODBINE < j Aa HAts ¦ h-L A. 10".C? ¦ $T 0 :I HERITAGE • Q _?'? as a .-......s` =?¦ .RI.NGOALE ST " to _J ! < ;< AaL-?NST < Z 61 RUSSELL ->- QVEaLEA ? < $T < - \ E. G I ?! AN ST c J < ;AEG ;4 . J ST v<< U. ri z ?.! PALL! ?? , J __Nr, x?-¦= sT aNE3a OR ?L K ?I 91 S, F;;N;rSCz::::..Y_MARrwLLMa JFF LA SALL ST S" GC. O ST s y -¦ ?,E:G+90R CENr_ v c ?r y z S ACA+ :000SON ;ti .. S IAG PALM BLU-F -r TY> EAgwA'EF `' Q C, :CiaG=_yS.S < ;<_f ?'gquXD "'°'SCU $ BC ¦ sT "'STts:sr SEMINOLE ST ?? „E-To, i Sr. PALMETTO ¦ IF CCL 1 BOA TBA _DARQ NA ?.cST 4 Pr 3 O JACK n-_SS E_L C / = sc s ` J 'Y> SL <o.., p SrAaIuM NICHOT SO 0 Q > O \ I WA - ?. T - SEMINOLE < ST >. - Z NORTH F CLEA 'vArE,- > < O J I ELEM ' >. > ELDRIDGE COUNT Y = <' J Q HARBOR • ?, .. -` , ST >? BLUFfS W o ?qv I G I$LA '0 -A 7-E M1ILLE' ¦5 Op G.. Y/IN Y • 5 - P A• Rl 5bc x = SGr! CE \-R CCiAS r GUAf ? \'11?/? STA TIDY a a a a 7 h ?? I t 01j, z 0MA?L ST Z.. wMAPLEST ?ST Co;e _ 1 I x ¢ - ?{-=V < _ + ... Z .? . ?I ¦ MAPLE -= W Oo - - 1 GE RCiIA O ` p.,,LZA . s -= -• - Z < < JA^AAnDA CIA N O L AV ? < b Z ' JACKSON > ?F I < STAT < _ .-'.$T. U. _z ..r :FOR=-S? Rc' ?9 1 ST -• z O CL EA WATER JACARANDA P'N \ .. z -. FERRY I CR JONES AAISERT O -ST . ?. KENWOOD DREWZ LAX OARD OF < CRESti cW if x?FCOArM RCE tL RE > 590 ; SST ARDE SGARDENS IS =ALrORS DREW RO• I ? i SUNSET S soN.go. v?O'>s y UH o m°? ' i P INT HARBORSID z GOvA z w ?S ]F, qC ' L`1 5 TEVEN AvLN H ?' - • i ;vE,v.SON z _ ZO < THANE S?? /ISTA Z JQEL IN / (I? ¦ ? _ Q _J.\ W% VENETIAN + -A N f" Z z ?J O> HGHIANC n./ GNTQq u < 0 ?J < BENTL S-?< SHOPPING D POINT - •.G(lcL,.S C 3 • >J C-,sv.OY ANE z _ t r c O E.v<S Q) r ....+..... ¦ . AFjOLYN EL -.v w0 .. *.., LEBcAU ?r z - >? E -KvOls= o LN.w m_-I-- HE :EN CkRCLYN P?.':"c55 OSAGE QP N4q. i 4_ Q GL?, r SANOY0 LN s.j. rnGS z?A;??`! •: aLEA9AV- s -' -gs° 9, lp ' 9_ < ;MARY.LRD3 F Es+ n_`N A)iD TOWER, CLIPPER C VE I s of S- " . -AVrK ' ?? s Fl 9 ?aovE IRCLE :40 PIERCE !' ?? BA YFROA/T Tc .APL E.f? PwELUSCOON?Sn? HOUSE 5 RE DE < GROVE Z 7Z _ ` - > $T .. AN == CwN 5 -` k _<*r I - > < - 3 G >- ? "L 3 GROVE < LAURA - POE. IBRARY ' .LAURA c . vE ._ T C LAURAs- 7« I ? Z LA ¢ ' g ¦ 1= =` ¢' ¦ CLEVE AND ... .. ST- = I = - o ¦..? - - < PA K POUCE $TA. . oI F c - -: u $T.._. .l. J _ ? Ir` nA,, ¦ ? z A:..v c C T LEVELA,vC --LAZA > ST SHOp.mK, Imo.. f Q JOAR ¦CE:v? ? IPtERCE _ = . FF A:IG1N ?? 90Z = 4 ? < ST ... C, 60 _ -• F ANKLIN O - _.... 0 I SI; Z 1 T, < < s RA.NKLIr ST CIA FRAY .. r - > T? COURT ST a I GOULO - : a s It- CILIA O s :E REV^N < = - . z LCHESTN T ?RGWNE_LT RCL.O a Q .5'A 7R CORRT?,sASTN?S a - ? S o?!N=o A ¦ ST .....0 SPOrTISWOOOE on Q JASR:'1 • DRU SPOTTISWOODESPOrTsu, o MINE:' , SOOL, HARBOR Q Jy1AcNOLIA EL EM OAKS LOTus > o ?>- AIOR"ON :'NOS -AL CL EARWA rER Cl Tv LrM?S _ ORUIO SA, o- ------- --- - _ -- L= c :. L I > LN PINELI. , aQCweR. - z i Q NA?KIN RO I T7 . ?z ST; CORBE AMBLESIOE LL - i OR _--BST c ,? -T a INGOr? Belleview 0,- lslan o, ` v p9 ?'O9 j 'Q ?? ? F4S ? BELL_°v+Ew jt &L rAIORE B ¦ GOLF A ? I•N INTgY Figure 1: EAS• ..R?. - GOLF COURSE (L .-? ,1 .AC LBNa 21 ? BELLEVIEW ; W o v BLVd P -- t WY LO -zs•-_ - INER ST . cN ¦7AKj N.ROGNER ST ROLo .... _... , .. zGOlf ... CT PINiST PINE a-'. O pVfEW Z GOL- COURT. 0 R 1 .. a Pi E S' S A O!`? I <PINE?' U z ST D RD - a? RUID= - LU - WY -c ...O. ?CI-? j ...=.S•1_INE O JA .._ ? ?A56ur.E Z .. DR 0. Z 'CIR S - MAGNOLIA }. c ?. < < , PATH? W SCNSHLV_ - Or 'H d ?.AAGNC.:A7aO Q a ...ti MALL OT-S'L W } 3 W ..Y m ?,LOTUSi. PA-HM- ..? • T'? w G: S`-CPP: PA-? u,-.--. _C o > c F q 5_T ?t 1ND rnnCENTR ¦0 > O N ;Ho?Pr?c, ... BARRY ,=>.z S 95 c S Ej FN,A _E:vrEr6,r cl s TUSCOLA J z < < S Cr 3_": = EL .M i;- N ¦ .-MILTON Z ST ?'HGr?:vC -d? LAKE IEW c`< r 13R IN I skOoI-!NG 8 < ?< ST D CENT;; M ¦ -a' Hr Z BYRON OR .RE SrA NO 1'¦ V O _ _ NO ,11 ?.1Y PARK .o vcLO S 3.?5 >a >: Z u>AL `a .. Lake a< : < L?< `, i."ATa A _ S =9 ellevle I G z } ! -QAANC??, - > x Z ...... ._ ._' s- 7: u^ F= =.CA PIE! Lt' NORrON a5n Q z \ Cx WCl > TEMPLE 4 - _ PARK ¦ HAR EY xv S • ?2? 14 2 L. ? LLEV.e?q BLVD' CITRUS ST > gEC.bCNr H RRISnI ?• YA BE '__ -V IEMQN ST S . rl"LAYGROUNJ WILLIAMS QI _ EABREEZE r LANlN< <O i Y ., ` K_... gSERv a: Study Location MSI i i i 7 THE ATRIUM cr- cr- Z. to :e: ? ? PEACE NEMORIAL BUILDING PR CHURCH PIERCE STATION HARRISON COUNSELING ct- STREET PINECLas co. COURT ROUSE NOTE: LOCATION OF PARKING GARAGE MOVED FROM ORIGINAL LOCATION 1. Figure 2: N CLEVELAND STREET PARK STREET j W ? = Q ? Q W j Q Cllr OF CLEARNATER ESB/TERIAN POLICE STREET MINISTERIAL TRAINING AND Fr. PASTORAL W W HOTEL CENTER J ?- W N FRANKLIN (- - - ? STREET O ? PARKING ' I GARAGE ? COURT CHESTNUT STREET PROSPECT rowERs PROJECT VICINITY Msl e 1 Table 1 Comparison of PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Calculations Original Proposed Trip Building Use Try Generation Trip Generation Increase General Office 303 404 101 (as Corp HQ) General Office 374 491 117 (as STO) Original Gross Revised Gross Trips Trips As Corp HQ 628 729 As STO 713 830 h e Peak hour trips will be reduced by future church transit use. Table 2 illustrates t anticipated net PM peak hour trips using the same trip reduction rates as was used in the original report. Table 2 Effect of Transit Use on Total Project Trips Gross PM Trip Reduction due Net PM Trip Generation Method Peak Hour Trips to Transit Use Pk Hr Trips Corporate HQ by sq ft 729 462 267 Single Tenant Office by sq ft 830 530 300 The total trip generation based on these revisions is still lower than the original Walker Parking consultants study estimate of 1025 vehicles. Therefore, the trip generation estimates used in the original traffic impact study is applicable and are used in trip distribution in this report.. Trip Distribution Trips generated from the proposed center (1025 trips) were distributed onto the adjacent street system as described in the original report. Trips were distributed from the garage, which has a proposed driveway on Franklin Street. In the original report, two trip distribution scenarios were developed: one using the and one which considered a t em existing geometric configuration of the adjacent street sys proposed asymmetrical pair geometry for Fort Harrison Avenue and Myrtle Street. Based on our meeting with City staff, the asymmetrical pair geometry was not considered in this analysis. Trip distribution from the garage only changes in the immediate quadrant around the site. The overall distribution to the garage wouldn't change: trips coming from the east would still come from the east, etc. Figures 3 through 6 illustrate the pre-project and post-project trips on the adjacent street system based on the relocation of the garage. 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 5 ' ?% N m p c NON - M Q M Ii 60 coti 35 MMtD 14 -"" L- 165 J - 452 - J L 672 J L - 633 J I L - 653 69 36 CLEVELAND 17 45 114 -? r 26 - , STREET 26 r 51 J l 476- 499- i i 539- I 726- I 25 -i ??? mr m - ?'? - v 12 ti Nln cv? 13 m n p M c r- ? PARK STREET CD ~ N LU LU :z: W Q W tA > W ? = Q Q W Q ? No m D - ?- 10 c -"'- 29 I J I L a9 L J - 40 PIERCE ,- 21 --- 1 STREET 46 J r 71- 1 69 -r pmv 38 -) T N D N ? - co M PROJECT -i W SI TE Q: Q: N o O ID J I L J L 3 r- 10 FRANKUN 3 STREET 32 -? 1 1 r 8 I -? 4 m P ARKING C- G ARAGE 36 J -387 N" L 65 r- 125 J - ,98 COURT 47 O P STREET N I n L, V to m V 1 If1 - -? M ifl ? L - I+/ Q M L CHESTNUT 83 -? r STREET 6 f 593 - 79 196 -? vD 43 - ?v u m -0 o- ? EXISTING GEOMETRY Figure 3: Pre-Project-1999 Peak Hour Traffic MSI 7 7 7 7 7 ' - K C" CI- (4X) ? I cHES rNU r ? L lD N Figure 4: Peak Hour-Project Trips (Existing Geometry) MSl - r M N l0 l ` ? CLEVELAND 1 i STREET ? o ARK ? N STREET ? 2 W W Z Q O 2 ? 2 ? Q W K Q' ? Q Q "' O M I? + PIERCE M Q STREET loo (?oz,--? } - ? PROJECT M N SITE ? W ? u N _ Q f 13 I L ?- y e s (? s X) FRANKLIN (4a% )--I r- 15 (s 2 z) ? STREET 29 (1 3z 9 K 269 (27% ) 29 ENTERING m 995 EXITING 0 ? 2 9 COURT ?- 6 ) f21 % N STREET _ - ? NN O K.T K utJO- -. r N N STREET ? ' ..J 'I 7 J J 7 7 7 a J J 7 J J 8 CLEVELAND j N STREET 8 PARK STREET ? O W 2 ~ j O 1 i1 LL O 2 2 . W Ql) Q Q 8 PIERCE S TREE T r a 8 PROJECT I SITE W W to BUS ?oA :N'_' AR-:'A FRANKLIN STREET PARKING GARAGE 8 9 L-17 COURT J { - 9 S TREE T 9 CHESTNUT STREET Figure 5: Peak Hour-Project Bus Trips MSI _l 1 1 1 i N J m M n l- 6 0 N 3 5 M 'JN M •? ?- 14 c •+'tti : - ?-- 1 6 5 J I -452 - I L ^ 32 J 3 3 ^6 J 3 N _ G5 69 r CLEVELAND 7 L L 45 4 r 26 -? STREET 26 r -' f 51 __J 476- <?"c- - I ; 539 -- , r 726- l i l 25 Q? -? - 2 tiN ^. 13 I? N N c c ? 2N , ? .,? ? - y m PARK STREET N 2 W j 0 j Q j Q N m t0 :0 m p? ? 29 JI L 3 40 PIERCE J I L 9 1 4 21 71- 1 r/ STREET 154 - 5 1 -- I r - 69 o - v 38 -? Q1? tD ? m PROJECT SITE LU D v - °- 202 M PMV 9 JAL -0 ? 10 FRANKLIN I J L 3 Tr 1 r STREET 161 r e -- ; -Nm 319 --? N-M m PARKING u m - N - GARAGE 36 J 1 --42' m° r- 34Z 7 I couR r J - 4 1 3 47 o I STREET oLr, - _ -01 N? N 1 L CHESTNUT L 83 -' r STREET 76 --J 594 - I 797 - I r 1 9 6 --? Q u o- 43 ? me Lnm EXISTING GEOMETRY Figure 6: Post-Project Peak Hour Traffic MSI Traffic Impacts In the original report, the following intersections were analyzed Myrtle at Cleveland Myrtle at Pierce Myrtle at Court Myrtle at Chestnut Fort Harrison at Cleveland Fort Harrison at Pierce Fort Harrison at Court Fort Harrison at Chestnut Cleveland at Garden Cleveland at East Franklin at Myrtle Franklin at Fort Harrison Of these, the intersections of Myrtle at Court, Myrtle at Chestnut, and Franklin at Myrtle are anticipated to be influenced by the relocation of the garage. J A level of service analysis based on the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) of these three intersections was conducted for the post project condition. Table 3 summarizes the previous analysis results with the updated ones. The HCS analyses have been included. Table 3 Intersection Levels of Service Comparison of Conditions Existing Geometry Intersection Pre-Project Post Project (original) Post Proiect (revisedl Myrtle at Court B B B Myrtle at Chestnut B B B Franklin at Myrtle (1) C F F The intersection of Franklin and Myrtle is unsignalized. The Level of Service summarized above is for the sidestreet movements. HCS does not model unsignalized intersections well. As discussed in the previous report, many acceptable gaps should be presented to drivers waiting at Franklin Street. It is expected that the intersection of Franklin and Myrtle will operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour. 1 10 Recommendations and Conclusions Based on analysis provided above, there is no additional impacts on the adjacent street system that comes as a result of the land use revisions and parking garage relocation. Therefore, the conclusions developed in the original Traffic Impact Study are still applicable and no further detailed analysis is necessary. APPENDIX 7 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-06-1999 Markham - Stukes, Inc. Streets: (E-W) Chestnut (N-S) Myrtle Analyst: MSI File Name: CHESMYP.HC9 Area Type: CBD 8-3-9 PM peak Comment: Post-Project Existing Geometry ----------------- --- --- -------------------------------------- Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound Southbound L L R L No. Lanes J Volumes PHF or PK15 Lane W (ft) Grade J Heavy Veh Parking Bus Stops J Con. Peds Ped Button Arr Type RTOR Vols J Lost Time Prop. Share 7 Prop------------ Phase ProtCombi J J EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 18.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat: -------------- ------------------------- Intersection Perforr ---- ---- ---- 0 > 4 < 0 76 797 43 0.90 0.90 0.90 12.0 0 2 2 2 N N 0 0 (YIN) Y 14.5 s 4 0' 3.00 3.00 3.00 --------------- nation 1 2 0 0 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 i Signal Operatic 3 4 ---- ---- ---- 0 2 < 0 558 89 0.90 0.90 12.0 0 2 2 N N 0 (YIN) Y 16.0 s 4 0 3.00 3.00 --------------- >ns 5 0 > 2 0 273 412 0.90 0.90 12.0 0 2 2 N N 0 0 (YIN) Y 14.5 4 0 3.00 3.00 ----- 6 --------- 7 8 NB Le f t Thru Right Peds SB Lef t Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 52.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 _on order: #1 #5 --------------------------------- lance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts ----- Cap ---- Flow ------- Ratio ----- Ratio Delay - LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 1745 6980 0.642 -- -- 0.250 20.8 --- C ----- 20.8 --- C NB TR 2333 3457 0.324 0.675 1.5 A 1.5 A SB DfL 311 461 0.974 0.675 42.2 E 17.8 C T 1191 1765 0.3.84 0.675 1.6 A Inte rsection Delay = 14.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost ----- Time/Cycle, L -------------- = 6.0 -------- sec cri --------- tical v/c(x) = ----------------- 0.884 ------- ------- ---- J HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-03-1999 Ma rkham - Stukes, Inc. Streets: (E-W) Court ------------ (N-S) Myrtle --------------- Analyst: MSI File Name: COURMYP.HC9 Area Type: CBD 8-3-99 PM peak Comment: Post-Project Existing Geometry Eastbound Westbound ---- Northbound --------------- Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0> 4 < 0 ---- ---- 0> 2 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 2< 0 Volumes 47 413 71 41 535 350 29 PHF.or PK15 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 o Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Parking N N N N N N Bus Stops 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (YIN) Y 14.5 s (YIN) Y 14.5 s (YIN) Y 16.0 Arr Type 4 4 4 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share Prop. Prot. --------------------------- ------------------------------ Signal Operations -------------- Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OP Green 40.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 80 secs Pha se combination order: #1 #5 --------------------------- Intersec ------------------------------ tion Performance Summary -------------- Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ---- ------- Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS WB LTR 2755 6887 ----- ----- ----- --- 0.236 0.400 10.8 B ----- --- 10.8 B NB LT 1593 3034 0.422 0.525 6.5 B 6.5 B SB TR 1832 3489 0.241 0.525 5.7 B 5.7 B Intersection Delay =. 7.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 --------------------------- sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.341 -------------------------------------------- HCS:.Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MYRFRAP.HCO Page 1 Markham - Stukes, Inc. 11007 North 56th Street Suite 210 Tampa, FL 33607- Ph: (813) 988-4242 Streets: (N-S) Myrtle Avenue (E-W) Franklin Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Date of Analysis.......... 8/20/97 Other Information ......... Post-Project Existing Geometry Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC,s (o) SU/RV's (o) CV' s ( o ) PCE's ------------ 0 > 2 < 0 N 22 571 3 .9 .9 .9 0 1.10 --------------- 0 > 2 < 0 N 5 373 14 .9 .9 .9 0 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 < 0 161 8 319 .9 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 3 4 9 .9 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 -------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) -------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road -------------------- 5.50 -------------- 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MYRFRAP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from Minor Street --------------------------------- ----------- WB ----------- --------- ED --------- --- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 318 215 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 955 1077 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 955 1077 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 0.64 ------------------------------------ Step 2: LT from Major Street --------------------------------- ------------ SB ------------ -------- NB -------- --- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 637 430 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 780 1007 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 780 1007 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3800 3800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1900 1900 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 0.97 ------------------------------------ Step 3: TH from Minor Street ---------------------------------- ------------ WB ------------ -------- EB -------- -- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1096 1089 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 249 252 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 239 242 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 0.96 ------------------------------------ Step 4: LT from Minor Street ---------------------------------- ------------ WB ------------ -------- EB -------- -- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1084 1087 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 215 214 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.92 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.60 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------------------------------------ 129 ------------ 202 -------- HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MYRFRAP.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement - (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) ---- EB --- L ------ 197 ------ ------ 202 > ------- ------- ----- --------- EB T 10 242 > 433 715.1 88.6 F 715.1 EB R 389 1077 > WB L 3 129 > WB T 4 239 > 349 10.9 0.0 C 10.9 WB R 11 955 > NB L 26 1007 3.7 0.0 A 0.1 SB L 7 780 4.7 0.0 A 0.1 In tersection Delay = 234.1 sec/veh Y t'. Parking Consultants/ Engineers, Inc. November 11, 1997----??-( ORIGINAL RECEIVED Ken Pearse Church of Scientology Religious Trust 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 34616 =U 12006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Re: Church of Scientology Religious Trust -- Parking Supply and Demand Study Walker No. 15-1243.03 (Letter of Clarification) Dear Mr. Pearse: As a result of our recent conversations, we are providing this letter of clarification to our FSO Buildingg and Sanctuary Parking Supply and Demand Study dated September 2, 1997. This letter is intended to clearly indicate the reasoning for mitigating the number of parking spaces from the code interpretation to a more realistic parking requirement that is need-based. This update is necessitated as a result of further refinement by the Church of Scientology as to the intended use of its spaces and a clearer definition of the number of staff and students who will utilize the FLAG Shuttle system and carpool. The crux of the matter is as follows: ? The code requirements are based upon assigning a specific number of parking spaces as a result of a formula that is determined by the usage and/or square footage of the facility. ? The parking supply/demand study identifies the number of spaces needed based upon actual and projected parking demand figures. ? The code does allow mitigating circumstances such as shared parking, use of a transit system etc., in order to lessen the required number of parking spaces. In fact, some pertinent quotes from the code are the foundations for the mitigation employed in the study: "It is hereby declared to be the intent... to provide for sufficient flexibility in the parking requirement formula so as to allow for consideration of individual situations and more innovative solutions..." 4902 Eisenhower Boulevard, Suite 281, Tampa, Florida 33634 Tel: (813) 888-5800 Fax: (813) 888-5822 i Church of Scientology Religious Trust-1997 "specific factors may be taken into account and applied toward the number of required parking spaces ...such as carpooling or public transit opportunities and requirements for employees or visitors" The code requirements employed for the study are as follows: The Sanctuary is classified as a church and has a requirement for "one parking space per three seats". 2,700 seat Sanctuary: x1 space / 3 seats = 900 spaces. Per the information provided by the Church of Scientology, the FSO Building is classified as follows: Category Sq. Ft. or # of seats Requirement per space Parking Required Code Section Office 217,363 sq. ft. 400 543 40.488 (3) (a) Storage 3,873 sq. ft. 400 10 40.488 (3) (a) Ministerial Trig. 47,152 sq. ft. 400 118 40.488 (3) (a) Museum 9221 sq. ft. 250 37 42.34 (6) (d) 5. a. Church 3,460 sq. ft. 30 115 42.34 (6) (d) 4 a. Retail 1,669 sq. ft. 400 4 40.488 (3) (a) Library Office 1,269 sq. ft. 400 3 40.488 (3) (a) Library Reading 2,581 sq. ft. 250 10 42.34 (6) (d) 5. a. Services (track) 11,015 sq. ft. 400 28 40.488 (3) (a) Sauna 1,416 sq. ft. 400 4 40.488 (3) (a) Restaurant 1,020 sq. ft. 200 5 TOTAL: 300 loz 877 [4-43 Please note that this reclassification of the Assembly area (as annotated in the original study) from Assembly area to Ministerial Training (Office space) is in recognition of the actual use of the space. This area is used more like the traditional office/service setting since the occupants normally spend an eight hour day in an "office-type setting" studying religious materials. This interpretation of the code brings the total code requirement back to a more realistic acknowledgement of the manner in which the space will actually be used. 2 1 Church of Scientology Religious Trust -1997 It is important to note that the 877 spaces are not added to the 900 spaces since the parking requirement should only be counted once. In other words, the users of the Sanctuary and the FSO Building are the same people and will not occupy both facilities simultaneously. The below table reflects the information that was current as of the date of the Walker study and was based upon actual observed . parking demand as well as data collected through 456 surveys of Church staff, students, and parishioners. Category Project Number of People in Building % of People that Drive a Vehicle Potential Number of Vehicles % of People in Building during Weekdays 8am-6pm Projected Number of Vehicles Staff 1,597 35% 559 95% 531 Students: Local Residents 153 74% 113 54% 61 Non Local 357 38% 136 93% 126 Non CW Staff Students 800 14% 112 99% 111 Counseling: Local 223 75% 167 90% 151 Non local 413 14% 58 77% 45 TOTAL: 3,543 1025 Therefore, if we take the parking demand as computed in the Walker study, and apply proper mitigating factors, we should find the actual parking demand. To this figure, we should add a 10% cushion in order to accommodate for the dynamics of cars entering and exiting parking spaces and to minimize the time required to search for the last available parking space. After these computations, we should arrive at a figure that is truly need-based and yet still meet the spirit and intent of the city code. 3 00 Church of Scientology Religious Trust -1997 We have identified factors that mitigate the actual parking demand and these factors are identified below: Available on/off Street Parking Spaces Walker found that there are some 618 on/off street parking spaces within 600 feet that are available for parking. These spaces are primarily available during weekends and nights and could meet the requirement for shared parking, though the Church has indicated that the City is not willing to use this number in the calculations. Fort Harrison Hotel Parking There are 155 parking spaces available at the Fort Harrison Hotel that are also available for parking and the Church has indicated that the City is not willing to use this number in the calculations. Use of FLAG Shuttle System The Church policy of allowing only 7% of the staff driving privileges reduces the requirement from 531 projected vehicles to 113 projected vehicles. The Church policy of making it mandatory that all 800 Out of Town Staff Trainees use the FLAG Shuttle System reduces the requirement from 111 projected vehicles to zero projected vehicles. We have provided a table below which will assist in clarifying the mitigating factors employed in calculating the adjusted parking demand. 4 Church of Scientology Religious Trust -1997 'Church • Scientology ' • Demand Mitigating Circumstances .. November Category Projected number % of People Potential % of people in Projected Mitigation Adjusted of people in that drive number of building during number of Requirement buidling a vehicle vehicles weekdays vehicles Sam-6pm Staff 1,597 35% 559 95% 531 447 113 Students: Local Residents 153 74% 113 54% 61 0 61 Non Local 357 38% 136 93% 126 0 126 Non CW Staff & Students 800 14% 112 99% 111 111 (0) Counselin : Local 223 75% 167 90% 151 0 151 Non Local 413 14% 58 77% 45 0 45 SUB TOTAL: 3,543 1025 496 Minus Available Supply (64) SUB TOTAL: 432 Plus Eff. Parking Supply Factor 10% 475 We think it is important to note that this increased use of the FLAG Shuttle System will enhance the quality of life within the downtown area of Clearwater. The decrease of approximately 600 vehicles from the roadway system will assist the city in their traffic flow throughout the downtown area. These 600 vehicles represent 1,200+ vehicular trips per day that will not be on the roadway system due to the use of the FLAG Shuttle System. In addition, it is also important to note that through the use of an alternative mode of transportation (such as a transit system) the quality of the air will improve dramatically through the lessening of pollutants by these 1,200+ vehicular trips. At this point, we cannot see any other mitigating circumstances which would affect either the parking demand or the code requirements. 5 Church of Scientology Religious Trust -1997 If you have any questions please contact me at 813-888-5800. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide our parking expertise. As always we enjoyed working with your excellent organization. Sincerely, Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers ames A. Mora Project Manager 6 = I I . rm- Parking Consultants/ Engineers, Inc. September 2, 1997 Ken Pearse Church of Scientology Religious Trust 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 34616 Re: Church of Scientology Religious Trust -- Parking Supply and Demand Study Walker No. 15-1243.02 (Revised Final) Dear Mr. Pearse: We are pleased to submit this revised Parking Supply and Demand Study for the Church of Scientology in Clearwater Florida. This study per our scope, analyzes the parking supply and demand with the proposed building of the FSO Building and Sanctuary. This is the final report and includes the current FSO Building space program as well as information concerning the new driving/parking policy for staff members for the Church of Scientology. If you have any questions please contact me at 813-888-5800. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide our parking expertise. As always we enjoyed working with your excellent organization. Sincerely, Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers ames A. Mor Project Manager 4902 Eisenhower Boulevard, Suite 281, Tampa, Florida 33634 Tel: (813) 888-5800 Fax: (813) 888-5822 Church of Scientology Religious Trust FSO Building and Sanctuary Parking Supply and Demand Study Prepared by: Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers Inc. Final (Revised) September 2, 1997 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Table of Contents Executive Summary i Introduction 1 Definition of Terms 1 Methodology 3 Study Area 3 Project Details 6 Parking Analysis 8 Present Supply 8 Future Supply 9 Effective Supply 9 Parking Occupancy 10 Design Day (Future) 11 Parking Adequacy 13 Code Interpretation 14 Parking Alternatives 18 Increase Supply 18 Reduce Demand 20 Miscellaneous 21 Recommendations 21 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix D Appendix C CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST List of Tables Table 1: Future Design Day with FSO Building 100% Occupied 11 Table 2: Future Design Day with Sanctuary Friday Graduation Event 12 Table 3: Future Design Day with Weekend Sanctuary Event 12 Table 4: Future Parking Adequacy for Design Days 13 List of Figures Figure 1: Study Area Figure 2: Project Specific Relocations Figure 3: Parking Segments by Type Figure 4: November 15, 1996 Occupancy Profile 5 7 8 10 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Executive Summary Model Results The Church of Scientology Religious Trust engaged Walker Parking Consultants to perform a comprehensive study of the area surrounding their future facilities. These facilities are a 323,000 square foot Flag Service Organization Building (FSO) and a 2,700 seat Sanctuary to be located in downtown Clearwater. Walker Parking Consultants developed a parking model to determine the parking needs for these new facilities. The model was constructed for a design weekend with 2,700 attendees for an evening Sanctuary event and a design weekday with 3,543 FSO building occupants (1,597 staff, 1,310 students and 636 public parishioners). The parking analysis was developed with data collected in 456 surveys of Church of Scientology staff, students, and parishioners. The model was then compared with actual parking conditions during the weekday and an evening Sanc- tuary type event. ¦ Key Finding: The parking that is available with the FSO and Sanctuary buildings operational both on- street and off-street is: Weekday - 64 spaces Weekend/evening -- 685 to 1,814* spaces " includes spaces posted with restrictions but not enforced after typical business hours ¦ Key Finding: The modeled parking demand for a weekday with 100% FSO Building occupancy is 1,025 spaces. ¦ Key Finding: The model parking demand for a weekend night event with 2,700 attendees in the Sanctus is 916 spaces. ¦ Key Finding: The Sanctuary and the FSO Building will not be occupied simultaneously and will be able to share arking space. ¦ Key Finding: The peak parking deficit occurs during the week day and is 961 spaces. The deficit is equal to the demand (1,025 spaces) minus the supply (64 spaces). CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Clearwater Code The City of Clearwater Land Development Code, 1992, governing parking - ® Code Interpretation: The code requires 900 parking spaces for the Sanctuary and 1,705 spaces for the FSO Building. There is flexibility in the Clearwater code for the parking requirements. Reductions to the required spaces are allowed as outlined under Section 40.488.4. ® Code Interpretation: There is an allowance for shared parking between different businesses. This part of the code will allow shared parking between the Sanctuary and the FSO Building since both will not be occupied at the same time. This could also allow shared parking with local businesses within 600 feet of the Sanctus and FSO building. ® Code Interpretation: There is an allowance for high transit and carpool rates. This will allow credit for the large number of staff utilizing the FLAG bus. ® Code Interpretation: There is an allowance for public parking and private parking. This will allow credit for the on street parking spaces (after 6 p.m.) and the available off-street public spaces. This could allow credit for private spaces if the Church leases spaces within 600 feet of the FSO Building and Sanctuary. Recommendations Decrease demand for weekday parking for the FSO building. ? Encourage Staff and Outer Organization students to utilize the FLAG bus system with an incentive program. This could reduce staff and student parking demand by 642 spaces. ? Encourage staff and outer organization students to increase carpooling with an incentive program CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST ? Develop alternative transportation with a bicycle program for staff, outer organization students and public use. Increase Parking Supply around the FSO Building during the weekday and the Sanctuary during large event weekends. ? Institute a reserved parking zone in place of assigned spaces in the Fort Harrison Hotel. This will increase daily supply by 40 spaces. ? Contact the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to lease spaces in the parking lot north of the FSO building site. These gated 105 spaces are not utilized at night. This would increase the weekend night parking supply for the Sanctuary by 105 spaces. ? As a final solution, if demand reductions cannot be achieved, construct a 961 space parking structure to meet daily demand from the FSO Building. Miscellaneous options for meeting City of Clearwater parking requirements. ? Exercise payment in lieu of parking option under the City of Clearwater code. The one-time cost per space will be $4,500. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Introduction The Church of Scientology Religious Trust engaged Walker Parking Consultants to perform a comprehensive study of the area surrounding their future facilities. These facilities are primarily a 323,000 square foot Flag Service Organization Building (FSO) and secondarily a 2,700 seat Sanctuary to be located in downtown Clearwater. The objectives of this study are: ? To analyze parking supply /demand in the area surrounding the proposed FSO Building and Sanctuary building. ? To determine parking surplus/deficit at the completion of the FSO Building and Sanctuary. ? To evaluate parking alternatives (leasing existing spaces, shuttle bus service, etc.) ? To research the City of Clearwater Parking Code. Evaluate applicability to the FSO and Sanctuary projects. Definition of Terms The following definitions are provided to clarify the terms used in this document. Occupancy - The number or percent of parking spaces occupied by vehicles. This information is gathered by performing parked vehicle counts in each parking facility located in the study area. Parking Supply - The total number of parking spaces in the study area. 1 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Effective Parking Supply - The total number of parking spaces less a cushion of spaces for unavailable spaces and user's convenience. The cushion includes: spaces under minor construction, spaces blocked by cars entering and exiting spaces, spaces restricted by tenant or users, and spaces occupied by misparked cars. Also excluded are the very last spaces available which would take an inordinate amount of time and effort to locate. Parking Demand - The number of parking spaces used by staff, students, residents and visitors during busy times representing design conditions. This is estimated by comparing the observed number of vehicles parked in the study area with the number of vehicles that a computer model predicts based on the building sizes and uses, and number of staff, students, employees and visitors in the study area. Parking Adequacy - The difference between the effective Parking supply and the estimated or projected parkins demand. Peak Hour - The hour when the greatest number of cars are parked. In the downtown Clearwater area this occurs most often at 10 a. m. on a weekday. Design Day - A day representative of the typical busy parking conditions that the parking system must be able to support. In this report, we state the following three different design days: ? Monday thru Friday, peak hour, with no Sanctuary Event ? Friday night with weekly Sanctuary Event ? Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights with a Sanctuary Event which occurs 6 times per year. Captive parking - A captive parker patronizes multiple businesses on one trip. An example would be a staff member who works at Fort Harrison Hotel, but walks to 2 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST eat at the staff dining room in the Clearwater Bank building and then studies at the Staff College. Non Captive ratio - The ratio of single destination parkers divided by the total parkers Land Use - A zoning term referring to how a property is utilized (i.e., retail, agricultural, residential etc.) Methodology The maximum staff, public and student attendees were projected for both buildings. From this data, Walker Parking Consultants developed a parking model for a maximum design weekend with 2,700 attendees for a Sanctuary event and a design weekday with 3,543 FSO Building occupants. The parking model was developed with data collected in 456 surveys of Church of Scientology staff, students, and parishioners. Examples of the surveys and their respective data are located in Appendix A. The surveys developed a detailed parking profile for each segment of the buildings' populations. To verify the parking model, the actual number of cars in the study area were recorded on a weekday (Friday) at 10 a.m., 2 p.m., and 4 p.m. The cars were also counted during a Sanctuary event on a Friday evening at 8 p.m. and 10 p.m. The November 6, 1996 car counts are located in Appendix B. - Study Area The study area incorporates a 15 block area of downtown Clearwater (see Figure 1). This area includes all available parking within 600 feet of the FSO Building and the Sanctuary. This distance is established in the Clearwater Code as the maximum distance for employee (400 feet for visitor) parking. 3 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST This downtown district is anchored by the Sun Bank Building in the North, the Fort Harrison Hotel in the Center, the Clearwater Police Department to the East and the Pinellas County Courthouse on the Southwest corner. The following boundary streets delineate the study area: East - East Ave. North -Cleveland St. West - South Osceola Ave. South -Chestnut St. This area of Clearwater includes: ? City and county municipal buildings - the county courthouse, city hall, fire station, and police station so. Church of Scientology with three buildings in the area (two will be demolished and replaced with the FSO Building and a parking structure) A small retail area along Cleveland Avenue so. One residential building Oak condominiums Small businesses, with a handful of restaurants 4 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Figure 1: Study Area O? NORTH I LAURA rTxeEY I c z T iwuRw ( s STRE-cr c d 1 ILI B $ f CLEVELAM r.r.RSO-------------rnvw"ET_- ? 0 PARK t. PIERCE rT,ecET ------- ------ m FWANIMM fIRE£T COURT ¦ mtEET IL, L? r rr M • R flo %-r----%`-- ?'--------a LEGEND PROPOSED FSO BUkDMC ® PROPOSED SANCTUARY M _ M STUDY AREA wa {er 5 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Project Details The FSO Building will consolidate and expand existing Scientology activities. These counseling and study activities are presently located in the Coachman Building, the Fort Harrison Hotel (three floors) and the Staff College (old Merrill Lynch Building). The FSO-Building will be constructed on the Church's open lot at Franklin and Garden Streets (see Figure 2). The Sanctuary will contain 2,700 seats and be located on the southeast comer of Garden and Franklin facing the FSO building. The Friday night Graduation Event and quarterly weekend Events will be relocated from the Fort Harrison Auditorium to the Sanctuary. The Sanctuary will be constructed on the site of the present Staff College, adjacent church parking lot and the 319 South Garden Building (see Figure 2). The Coachman building is presently leased and will be vacant upon occupancy of the FSO Building. The Fort Harrison Hotel will revert back to its original use of an accommodations building for church parishioners. 6 .I . CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Figure 2: Project Specific Relocations ON 14 op NORTH LAURA nwEu? Z. LAURA I STREET I? 1 CLEVELAND WS.R so- - - - ,1 +; COURT ' STEtEEi a? f . rmmm'T-ma --------? LEGEND PROPOSED FSO BUILDING PROPOSED LINCTUMY - M MOY AREA wa ter hommmet-A . C0,10/MM, PARK ETIRET 7 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST harking analysis This analysis quantifies and characterizes the present existing parking supply and the impact of the FSO and Sanctuary buildings on it. The parking demand generated by users of the new facilities is also modeled to determine type and quantity. Finally, the parking deficit or surplus is determined with these inputs. Present Supply The present parking supply in the study area is characterized as follows: Figure 3: Parking Segments by Type off-street surfaCE on-street meters off-street garages 2,516 spaces ? 80% of parking lots have less than 40 spaces 50% of parking spaces are located in seven (7) lots 8 CHURCH OF' SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS CRUST 2,212 spaces (88% of spaces) are reserved during the weekday Future Supple With the construction of the FSO and Sanctuary buildings, 111 unrestricted parking spaces will be lost. These spaces are located adjacent to the Staff College (Merrill Lynch building) and on the Church's open lot (future site of the FSO building). Therefore the future supply will be: 2,405 parking spaces ? 2,212 spaces (92%) are restricted Monday - Friday (8 a.m. - 6 p.m.) 1,720 spaces are restricted evenings and weekends (1,230 are "soft" restrictions). These soft restricted spaces are posted for business or municipal use but are not physically restricted by gates and are often used by non-tenants for evening events. Effective Supply The Walker Parking Consultants model generates an effective parking supply based on the actual parking supply, type of parking (surface lot, parking deck or on-street), the parkers (visitors, staff or Clearwater residents) and parking restrictions (meter, sign, gated lot). The effective supply also considers typical parking situations - misparked cars, minor road/lot construction, and the accepted time for a parking space search. (See Appendix C for evaluation of effective supply.) The calculated effective supply for the Church of Scientology in the study area is: Present Effective Supply Weekday -- 166 spaces 9 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELOGious TRUST , Weekend/evening -- 866-1,981 * spaces Future Effective Supply Weekday -- 64 spaces Weekend/evening -- 685-1,814* spaces Includes "soft" restricted spaces Parking Occupancy Parking Occupancy counts were recorded during five time periods -- 10 a.m., 2 p.m., 4 p.m., 8 p.m. and 10 p.m. on Friday, November 15, 1996. A detail table of parking lots/street parking and the respective car counts is in Appendix B. These counts were used to confirm existing parking demand for the present situation and to extrapolate future demand. Figure 4 details the occupancy profile. Figure 4: November 15, 1996 Occupancy Profile 1600 1400 -1200 a n1000 3 800 a 600 U 400 200 0 Hour 10 a. m. Zr- 2 p. m. 4 p.m. in H p.m. '. 10 P.m. ?r ® Key Finding: Peak occupancy was stable from 1C a.m. to 2 p.m. period with a smaller second peak at 1C p.m- during the Graduation Event. Peak occupancy was 57% of the overall supply at 10 a.m. Occupancy was 80% in the unrestricted long-term (> 3 hrs. ) 1 0 - CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST parking spaces. Therefore, there is sufficient parking within the design area for the current activity level. There is localized demand at the Coachman and Fort Harrison Hotel which exceeds supply, but outlying parking at the Staff College is available to help satisfy this demand. Design Day (Future) To predict future parking demand a parking model was based on three design days scenarios. The first design day reflects a typical weekday with the new FSO Building at 100% occupancy. The Staff college data is not included since its non captive ratio is zero (all the staff college occupants are counted in demand for other areas). The following is the occupant parking profile by group on the FSO maximum design day: Table 1: Future Design Day with FSO Building 100% Occupied Category Project % of People Potential % of People in Projected Number of that Drive a Number of Building Number of People in Vehicle Vehicles during Vehicles Building Weekdays Sam-6pm Staff 1,597 35°k 559 95% 531 Students: Local Residents 153 74% 113 54% 61 Non Local 357 38% 136 93% 126 Non CW Staff Students 800 14% 112 99% 111 Counseling: Local 223 75% 167 90% 151 Non local 413 14% 58 77% 45 TOTAL: 3,543 1025 ¦ Key Finding: The modeled demand for a weekday with 100% FSO Building occupancy is 1025 spaces. 11 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST The second design day analyzes a peak Friday night graduation event with 2,000 participants. Both the FSO and the Sanctuary buildings will not be occupied simultaneously. The parking profiles of the Sanctuary attendees at this event are as follows: Table 2: Future Design Day with Sanctuary Friday Graduation Event Category Number of People @ Friday Graduation % of People Who Drive A Vehicle Projected Number of Cars Clearwater Staff 412 35% 144 Out of Town Guest 397 25% 99 Now CW Staff Students - 14% - Local Parishioners 1,191 37% 441 ? Key Finding: The model demand for a Friday night event with 2,000 Sanctuary attendees is 684 spaces. The final design day analyzes a large two night weekend event in the Sanctuary with 2,700 participants. The parking profiles of the Sanctuary attendees at this weekend event are detailed below: Table 3: Future Design Day with Weekend Sanctuary Event Category Number of People @ Friday Graduation % of People Who Drive A Vehicle Projected Number of Cars Clearwater Staff 114 35% 40 Out of Town Guest 675 25% 169 Now CW Staff Students - 14% - Local Parishioners 1,911 37% 707 ? Key Finding: The model demand for a weekend event with 2,700 attendees in the Sanctuary is 916 spaces. 12 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Parking Adequacy A parking plan must address the parking surplus or deficit within the study area. This is called Parking Adequacy and is calculated as follows: Effective Supply - Modeled Demand = Parking Adequacy The Parking adequacy for all three design days is tabulated below: Table 4: Future Parking Adequacy for Design Days Design Day Effective Design Parking Supply Demand Adequacy Weekday with 64 1025 (961) FSO at Maximum Friday night with Sanctuary 685-1,814 684 1-1,130- Graduation special Event 685-1,814 916 (231) - 898* Weekend in Sanctus * Includes "soft" restricted spaces . ¦ Key Finding: The peak parking deficit is 961 spaces during a week day. (1025 minus 64) 13 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Code 0 nterpretation The portions of the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, 1992, governing parking, were completely revised in Supplements 11 (December 1995) and Supplement 10 (August 1995). The applicable sections (Appendix D) to the FSO Building and the Sanctuary projects are: Section 40.488 Development Requirements for the Core subdistrict. Section 42.34 Parking The parking spaces per land use is defined in Section 40.488 as: "Community service uses and places of assembly, miscellaneous public,/semipublic uses . . . shall comply with the parking schedule provided in Sect 42.34(6)" Under this section the Sanctuary would be classified as: "Churches: One parking space per three seats or 30 square feet of assembly floor area, whichever is the greater" This equates to 900 parking spaces for the Sanctuary. 2,700 seat Sanctuary X 1 space / 3 seats = 900 spaces The FSO Building is classified using several sections from the Code: Section 40.488(3)(a) - Office Space including Bookstore, Storage areas 1 space per 400 sq. ft. Section 42.34(6)(d)4.b. - Places of Assembly 2 spaces per 5 seats. 14 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Section 42.34(6)(d)5.a. Library, Museum 1 space per 250 sq. ft. Category Sq. Ft. or # of seats Requirement per space Parking Required Code Section Office 217,363 sq. ft. 400 543 40.488 (3) (a) Storage 3,873 sq. ft. 400 10 40.488 (3) (a) Assembly 2,358 seats 2 per 5 seats 943 42.34 (d) 4. b. Museum 9221 sq. ft. 250 37 42.34 (6) (d) 5. a. Church 3,460 sq. ft. 30 115 42.34 (6) (d) 4 a. Retail 1,669 sq. ft. 400 4 40.488 (3) (a) Library Office 1,269 sq. ft. 400 3 40.488 (3) (a) Library Reading 2,581 sq. ft. 250 10 42.34 (6) (d) 5. a. Services (track) 11,015 sq. ft. 400 28 40.488 (3) (a) Sauna 1,416 sq. ft. 400 4 40.488 (3) (a) Restaurant.- 1,020 sq. ft. 200 5 TOTAL:' 25t5, Zy5 1,705 This equates to 1,705 spaces required for the FSO Building. There are specific situations outlined in the Clearwater Code Section 40.488.4 where the "following factors may be taken into account and applied toward the number of required parking spaces": (1) "the number of available off-street public parking spaces that typically record less than a 90% utilization rate ... within 600 feet for long term parking". The resulting required parking spaces are: FSO building --1,705 spaces Sanctuary - 282 spaces (900-618) (2) "the number of spaces that can be provided within 600 feet for employees and 400 feet for visitors based upon shared use of existing parking spaces, public or private, due to variation in typical operating hours." This allows shared parking between the Sanctuary and 15 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST the FSO Building since both will not be occupied at the same time. Therefore the maximum space requirement is 1,498 spaces from the FSO Building. (3) "the number of available off-street parking spaces within 600 feet for employee parking and 400 feet for visitor parking, owned or leased by the applicant for off-site parking space ... during its normal hours of operation." This would allow for 155 spaces of the Fort Harrison Hotel Deck (10 spaces excluded for hotel guests) to be applied to the parking requirement. Therefore the parking requirement is further reduced to 1,550 spaces. (4) "the number of parking spaces that should be added or subtracted based upon unusual or special conditions unique to a particular use or based upon specialized programs such as carpooling or public transit opportunities and requirements for employees or visitors" High transit and carpool rate for staff and students could be used to justify reducing the parking requirement to the 961 spaces projected as the parking deficit by Walker Parking Consultants. If all staff and outer organization students took the FLAG shuttle system this could be used to reduce requirements further. (Possibly to 200 required spaces.) The Church of Scientology has indicated that a policy will be implemented in which only 7% of its staff will be allowed driving/parking privileges. This will result in a reduced requirement of 432 s ces. (5) "The amount of money offered as payment in lieu of providing required off-street parking space ..." Payment in lieu of parking is $4,500/space under present code. However, this option has never been exercised with the city. 16 . CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST (6) "The direct and indirect contribution toward and feasibility of acquisition, construction ... of new or expanded parking facilities in conjunction with the proposed use." Construct a parking structure to meet the demand remaining after considering the specific factors above. 17 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST ?arking Alternatives There are several options to reduce the parking requirements for a new facility. These options can be categorized as: ? increasing parking supply ? reducing parking demand ? miscellaneous Increase Supply The existing parking supply surrounding the FSO building and the Sanctuary is fairly restricted. It is primarily municipal and small business surface lots restricted by signage. The six parking structures/lots with 90 spaces or greater have -50% of the total parking supply. Excluding the Fort Harrison Hotel Garage, the parking lots > 90 spaces are: ? There are Five lots within 600 feet of FSO Building and Sanctuary. These lot/structures which potentially could lease spaces had only 171 open spaces during weekday occupancy count. ? One lot within 400 feet. This lot had only 25 open spaces during the weekday. These lots (Lots 7a, 2a, 15a, 17a, and 17d in Appendix C) are all -- 70% utilized during the weekdays. The 171 potentially leasable spaces would meet only 10% of the Church of Scientology's predicted parking demand. Weekday leasing is therefore not viable. For weekend evening events, the Pinellas Suncoast Transit authority lot (7a), adjacent to the Sanctuary and the private parking deck diagonal to the court house (17a) offer the best potential for leasing (379 spaces). The parking supply could be increased through better utilization of the Fort Harrison Hotel parking structure. Instituting a reserved parking zone in place of assigned parking spaces, would maximize the efficiency of the parking 18 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST deck. An additional 40 spaces for public parking would be generated. The disadvantage of this option would be peak days when the reserve zone is full. Remote parking with a shuttle system is a viable option. The FLAG bus system could be expanded to include a remote parking lot (Stein Mart for example). Upgrades to the FLAG bus system would be required, as well as incentives for the staff and the public to utilize the remote lot. Incentives could include: ? Free meal passes for the public ? Stipend for staff shuttle riders The biggest disadvantages to the remote system are the additional bus operating expenses and delays during heavy demand times (9:00 a.m. on weekdays and 9:30 p.m. on Friday evenings). Also, shuttle use must be coordinated around the remote parking lot's primary use. Valet parking increases parking supply by utilizing existing parking more efficiently. However, this option is very labor intensive and thus expensive. While effective for large events, such as Graduation, valet parking will be less helpful for daily occupants of the FSO building. There are no large parking decks or lots (except Fort Harrison Hotel), which are significantly under utilized during the weekday. The increased efficiency from installing weekday valet parking at the Fort Harrison Hotel would be 51 spaces. Valet service during Sanctuary events could increase the effective parking supply in the study area (by 72 spaces). Building a new parking structure within 400 feet of the FSO building and the Sanctuary will provide the closest and most convenient solution. The size of the required parking structure would be 961 spaces based on the present driving habits and parking supply. If the church of Scientology implements the 19 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST restrictions which would only allow 7% of its staff driving/parking privileges, the size of the required parking structure would be 432 spaces. This would probably be the most costly solution. Reduce Demand The parking demand for a facility is generated by the number and driving habits of its occupants. While occupancy is set, driving habits may be modified through incentives or restrictions. Parking demand could be reduced by 642 spaces during the weekday if Staff and Outer Organization students utilized the FLAG bus system. Present driving ratios indicate additional incentives or bus system capacity are needed to achieve this goal. Possible incentives could be: ? Stipend for staff members with no car ? Parking fee for staff members with a car ? Random prizes for bus ridership or Encourage carpooling with incentives to vehicles with three or more passengers: Prime parking spaces for carpool vehicles 10. Random monetary reward for car-poolers A car occupancy rate of four people (including the driver) would reduce parking demand by 133 spaces for Staff. or Parking demand could be reduced by providing alternative transportation -bicycles- for staff and public use. A bike program, modeled on the city of Seattle's, would provide free bicycles for staff and public use at multiple staging areas. In 20 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST addition, prime parking space could be restricted for bicycle use only. The disadvantages of this systems are capital and operating expenditures, cyclical use (weather dependent) and potential for property theft. Miscellaneous The City of Clearwater has a code provision for payment in lieu of parking. Under this ordinance, the Church of Scientology could make a one time payment of $4,500 per space for the City required number of spaces. This payment is less costly than actual construction of a parking facility. However, this options will not help meet the projected parking deficit of 961 spaces in the short-term. Recommendations To meet the projected deficit in parking the Church of Scientology has several options. Our recommendations are broken into three categories: Decrease Demand for weekday parking for the FSO Building. Encourage Staff and Outer Organization students to utilized the FLAG bus system with an incentive program. This could reduce staff and student parking demand by 642 spaces. Encourage staff to increase carpooling with an incentive program. This could reduce demand by 133 spaces, if four people per vehicle is achieved for staff. Develop alternative transportation with a bicycle program for staff, outer organization students and public use. 21 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST Increase Parking Supply for the FSO Building during the weekday and the Sanctuary during large event weekends. Institute a reserved parking zone in place of assigned spaces in the Fort Harrison Hotel. This will increase daily supply by 40 spaces. Contact the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to lease spaces in the parking lot north of the FSO building site. These gated 105 spaces are not utilized at night. This would increase the weekend night parking supply. If demand reductions cannot be achieved, construct a 961 space parking structure to meet daily demand from the FSO. Alternatively, if the restrictive driving/parking policy is implemented, construct a 432 spaces parking structure. This assumes a 95% effective supply in the new structure. Miscellaneous options for meeting the City of Clearwater's requirements Exercise payment in lieu of parking option under the City of Clearwater code. The cost per space will be a one time cost of $4,500. 22 Appendix A FSO Building Activity Survey Thank you for taking time for this survey. The Church of Scientology is striving to improve the present and future parking conditions for you. Your participation in this study is appreciated. Survey Time: Please check one or more of the following: Staff Student Public How did you arrive at the Hotel? Drove and parked Rode with another Shuttle or Hotel Bus Walk or Bicycle Other: What time period(s) will you be in this HCG today? 1 am-6am 6am--9am 9am-12 pm 12 pm-3pm 3 pm - 6 pm 6pm-9pm 9 pm -12 am If you drove a car today - Survey Date: November 14, 1996 How many passengers were in the car (excluding driver) 0 3 1 4 or more 2 Will you visit another building(s) in the area before returning to your "home" no yes, how many buildings FSO Building Activity Survey Thank you for taking time for this survey. The Church of Scientology is striving to improve the present and future parking conditions for you. Your participation in this study is appreciated. Survey Time: Survey Date: November 14, 1996 Please check one or more of the following: FSO Staff Outer Org Trainee Out of State Public Resident Clearwater Public How did you arrive today? Drove and parked Rode with another Flag Bus or Van Walk or Bicycle Other: What time period(s) will you be in this building? _ 1 am -- 6 am 6am--gam gam--12 pm 12prrr--3pm 3pm--6pm 6pm--9pm 9 pm --12 am If you drove a car today - How many passengers were in the car (excluding driver) 0 3 1 4 or more 2 Will you visit another building(s) in the area before returning to your "home" no yes, how many buildings ==- I SURVEY DATA TABLE 4 '(Survey Results From Future FSO Buildina Occupants Survey Participant who drove Total # surveyed % who Drove Peak # M-F 8am-5pm % In Building M-F Ii 8am-5pm ;COACHMAN Outer Org. ( 9 64 14.1% 64 100% St aff 32 92 34.8% 87 95% Clearwater Res. 45 61 73.8% 33 , 54% I? Out of Town 15 40 37.5% 37 93% ?i OTALS 101 257 39.3% j IiFT. HARRISON HOTEL - Counsel II Out of Town 6 44 13.6% 34 77 Ii Staff ('Clearwater Res 4 3 13 4 30.8 /° 13 % 100 /° is 75.0% 4 100% itotals 13 61 21.3% Appendix B ®® 4 op NORTH m nitu-rLAUPA PWJKX F11 1 W 1 Y 6 1 W PARK tf11EIT 14 Z _ II 7 2 Coun I sir I 11 1 < 1 1 WYOO.EY n v! E, 1 I m smi-ow1w, - -- f m m =Wm = NO mmmmmmmm LEGEND 19 CAR COUNT BLOCKS ® PROPOSED PARKING I 1 + 115 November 15, 1996 CAR COUNT Description RESTRICTIONS CAPACITY 10 AM 2PM 4PM 8PM 10 PM SURFACE LOTS AND STRUCTURES lock 1 lot to behind Sun bank bldg meter 2 hr 37 21 17 10 36 30 lot lb beside Sun bank bldg sign 32 24 18 15 33 18 lot I c Corrections office parking sign 21 12 16 14 3 0 t 1d Park Jewelry sign 21 13 9 4 1 0 lock 2 t 2a Public Parking Garage 200 reserved 407 280 265 250 74 87 2b Peace Memorial Parking sign 24 17 17 17 1 1 Dlock 3 3a Housing Authority sign 32 10 25 25 4 13 3b Seabom Day Care sign 6 1 2 4 0 0 t 3c Future Police Department sign 14 14 7 0 0 0 block 4 of 4a sign 37 14 14 9 0 0 lot4b Hubbs Bar sign 7 3 4 6 6 4 lot 4c Kids Resource sign 5 2 5 6 0 0 of 4d behind Red Cross sign 34 13 6 5 0 0 t 4e Pinellas County sign 34 9 12 10 3 8 t 4f City Lot sign 37 6 6 7 0 2 t 4g CSRT sign 51 11 3 35 26 38 t 4h Red Cross (in front) sign 22 10 16 10 9 4 lock 5 t 5a lot at comer of Garden and Court sign 16 7 7 11 7 7 lot 5b behind orange concrete bldg. sign 3 2 3 2 1 0 lot 5C beside construction site sign 12 17 14 10 0 0 t 5d In front of bank construction aft sign 38 10 11 0 0 0 lot Se behind old train station sign 40 3 1 0 0 0 lot Sf behind bldg 630 Chestnut sign 14 8 7 7 1 0 lot 5g behind bldg 632 Chestnut sign 14 13 11 16 0 0 lot Sh behind bldg. 425 Chestnut sign 18 13 10 8 5 5 )ba 6 ea Coachman Lot sign 18 13 12 15 14 14 Bb next to Coachman sign 48 28 32 35 19 14 lock 7 7a Bus Station parking sign with gates 105 84 75 65 0 0 lock 8 lot 6a open lot where FSO will go free 60 41 61 42 35 121 block 9 lot 9a Water Department sign 8 6 7 7 8 8 t 9b Beside Water Department meter 0 0 1 0 7 7 t 9c Beside Water Department 6 meter/35 sign 30 21 23 17 47 47 block 10 t 10a beside Hanisons meter 20 0 1 0 19 14 t 10b behind Hanisons sign 10 4 16 7 21 16 block 11 Sot 1 la Beside Ole Town building sign 10 4 4 6 6 5 t 11b beside Ole Town Building sign 17 7 10 3 1 1 lot 11c Standard Station sign Is 20 20 20 20 11 block 12 lot 12b beside new Court house sign 11 9 9 5 3 0 block 13 lot 13a City lot behind ex gas Station sign 45 13 29 39 38 38 lot 13b Ft Hanson Hotel Garage 113 sign/55 free 168 97 117 113 95 120 t 13c Behind Plan Parenthood sign 12 9 4 2 0 0 of 13d Lot facing Court Street sign 39 39 30 26 0 1 November 15, 1996 AR COUNT Description RESTRICTIONS CAPACITY 10 AM 213M 4PM BPM 10 PM URFACE LOTS AND STRUCTURES lock 14 of 14a behind pink church sign 30 14 29 2 27 25 t 14b beside pink church sign 16 5 5 4 13 13 of 14c utilities bldg. parking sign 32 26 28 20 9 14 of 14d utilities bldg. parking sign 33 27 23 23 5 2 t 14e behind Cleveland Street shops sign 11 7 8 8 3 4 block 15 t 15a Municipal Grass Lot beside new Police Station sign 100 59 57 39 9 35 lock 17 of 17a Calvery Church lot sign 93 47 38 33 4 4 of 17b Oak Cove Condo sign 66 18 19 10 3 2 of 17c adjacent to Parking Deck sign 28 20 13 20 17 17 of 17d Private Parking Deck across from Crt House 10 meter/269 sign 279 154 170 204 16 15 lock 19 of 19a Law orrice parxmg sign 14 0 1 5 0 0 of 19b shop parking behind Ft Harrison SL shops sign 23 19 14 0 0 0 ON STREET PARKING park s 2 2-3 hr meter 11 7 7 8 13 2 court n 4 2-3 hr meter 14 2 3 0 0 2 an den w 5 2-3 hr meter 4 2 0 0 0 4 den e 5 2-3 hr meter 12 1 2 0 3 10 rt s 5 2-3 hr meter 12 2 1 3 1 12 w 9 d 2-3 hr meter 12 4 4 1 3 25 kley 10 2-3 hr meter 10 0 0 0 0 0 s s 12 2-3 hr meter 7 2 0 0 0 0 J s n 12 2-3 hr meter 7 10 0 0 2 2 r s 12 2-3 hr meter 13 0 2 0 5 5 s 6 2 hr sign 9 9 7 8 9 7 n 6 2 hr sign 6 6 5 5 6 6 k s 6 2-3 hr meter 7 7 6 4 4 5 s 1 2 hr sign 14 13 11 7 12 8 n 1 2 hr sign 12 11 5 8 11 8 d w 7 2-3 hr meter 8 1 0 0 7 8 park s 7 2-3 hr meter 12 10 7 6 9 10 and w 8 2-3 hr meter 8 1 0 0 1 9 frank n 8 2-3 hr meter 9 0 1 1 6 11 osce w 13 2-3 hr meter 7 3 1 2 5 7 east e 1 2-3 hr meter 2 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 2616 1415 1424 1304 746 906 Appendix C Study Area Supply and Effective Supply Present ec ve nsenl uture resent stove resent uture Capacity Parking Supply Supply Effective Supply, Effective Supply Parking Supply Supply Effective Supply Effective Supply M.F 6am-5m Factor M-F 8am-5 m M F A 5 E 1 m m von n Factor Evening Evenin SURFACE LOTS AND STRUCTURES block 1 Is 37 0 37 0.95 35 35 1b 32 0 0 It: 21 0 0 1d 21 0 0 Awk 2 28 407 207165• 0.9 62 62 332 0.9 299 299 2b 24 0 0 3 3a 32 0 0 3b 6 0 0 3c 14 0 0 4 4a 37 0 0 4b 7 0 0 k 5 0 0 at 4d 34 0 0 4e 34 0 0 at 4f 37 0 0 at 40 51 51 4h 0.95 48 0 51 0.95 48 0 22 0 0 3lock s Sa 16 0 0 Sb 3 0 0 5c 12 0 0 Sd 38 0 0 se 40 0 0 5f 14 0 0 59 14 0 0 511 1e 0 0 Nock B at 6a 16 9 0.95 9 9 9 0.95 9 9 at 6b 48 0 0 )lock 7 7a 105 0 0 Mock 8 681 60 60 0.95 57 0 60 0.95 57 0 9 9a 8 0 0 9b 7 0 7 0.95 7 7 at 9c 30 0 6 0.95 6 6 ' Aock 10 1oa 20 0 20 0.95 19 19 at lob 10 0 0 Aock 11 at 11a 10 0 0 at 11b 17 0 0 11c 16 0 0 12 t 12b 11 0 0 13 l 13a 45 0 0 13b 168 55 0.95 62 55 tee 1 168 168 13c 12 0 0 1 13d 39 0 0 Study Area Supply and Effective Supply M Capacity Parking Supply Effective Supply rsasnt Effective Supply to ruaent Effective Supply Parking Supply Effective Supply resent Effective Supply Future Effective Supply Mf, 8am-6pm Factor M-F, gam-5pm M-F, llam-5pm Evening Factor Evening Evening SURFACE LOTS AND STRUCTURES 14 14a 30 0 0 14b 16 0 0 14c 32 0 0 14d 33 0 0 140 11 0 0 1s 150 100 0 0 Dlock n 17a 93 0 0 17b 6a 0 0 17c 28 0 0 170 278 0 0 Ylock 19 19a 14 0 0 19b 23 0 0 ON STREET PARKING )wk s 2 11 0 11 0.85 9 8 n 4 14 0 14 0.85 12 10 w 5 4 0 4 0.85 3 3 05 12 0 12 0.85 10 9 s5 12 0 12 0.85 10 9 and w 9 12 0 12 0.55 10 9 10 10 0 10 0.85 9 7 $12 7 0 7 0.65 6 5 n 12 7 0 7 0.85 6 5 s12 13 0 13 0.85 11 9 86 9 0 9 0.85 8 7 n 6 6 0 6 0.85 5 4 s6 7 0 7 0.85 6 5 51 14 0 14 0.85 12 10 n 1 12 0 12 0.85 10 9 w7 a 0 8 0.85 7 6 a? 12 0 12 0.85 10 9 we a 0 a 0.65 7 6 n S 9 0 9 0.85 8 7 w 13 7 0 T 0.85 6 5 @1 2 0 2 0.85 2 1 Otal6 2523 176 226 126 856 614 685 'There are 207 pubic spaces but a 6 morrIr waiting lot for lease rsqueat. Observation at M am on Nov. 15 was a steady flow of cars into the unleased parking spaces. By 9:15. the approximate start time for Church activities, thxe were only 65 smpty spaces in the garage. Appendix D ZONING (2) View corridor. 40 percent of the width of the property (measured parallel to Clearwater Har- bor) shall be kept free of buildings for the purpose of providing a view corridor to Clearwater Harbor and Clearwater Beach. The view corridor may be a single continuous space or divided incremen- tally. The area within the corridor(s) may be maintained as open space, be utilized for ameni- ties, or be surfaced for unenclosed parking. (3) Amenity area. Properties shall be provided with ground level amenities which positively con- tribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the urban center district, in accordance with the following schedule: Minimum Amenity Area (Percentage of Lot Floor Area Ratio Area) 0.5-1.0 5 1.0-2.010 -All amenity areas shall be designed to be used by the public and shall be located adjacent to street rights-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street rights-of-way. Such improvements may include interior or exterior pedestrian plazas, seating areas, fountains, sculptures or other works of art, and landscaped areas and gardens; floor area devoted to ground floor pedestrian interest uses in parking garages may be used to meet up to 50 percent of the required amenity area. All r v Supp. No. 14 CD40:67 640.488 outdoor amenity areas shall be provided with illumination devices. Properties having less than 500 square feet of amenity area required by the above schedule are exempt from the requirements of this subsection. (Code 1980, § 135.144; Ord. No.. 5235-92, § 1, 10-7-93; Ord. No. 5296-92, § 2, 9-16-93; Ord. No. 5597-94, § 1, 9-1-94; Ord. No. 5962-96, § 1, 8-15- 96) Sec. 40.488. Development requirements for the Core subdistricts. (1) Dimensional and numerical requirements. (a) In the UC (C-1) subdistrict, the maximum floor area ratio shall be 3.0, the maximum height shall be 150 feet, and the maximum residential and hotel/motel density shall be 70 units per gross acre. In the UC (C-2) subdistrict, the maximum floor area ratio shall be 5.0, the maximum height shall be 180 feet and the maximum residential and hotel/motel density shall be 70 units per gross. acre. In both subdistricts, all new structures shall observe the required build-to lines and cornice heights of the design guidelines. There are no side or rear set- back requirements. (b) Bonus provisions. In the UC (C-1) subdis- trict: Floor area ratio, height and density may be increased according to the following schedule. ZONING 4 40.488 . vided with a minimum of one parking space mined by the traffic engineer, within 600 per four hundred (400) square feet of gross feet for long-term (over three hours) and floor area. 400 feet for short-term (three hours or less) (b) Restaurant and entertainment uses shall parking. be provided with a minimum of one park- (b). The number of spaces that can be provided ing space per each 200 square feet of gross within 600 feet for employees and 400 feet floor area. for visitors based upon shared use of exist- (c) Hotels motels and bed and breakfast inns ing parking spaces, public or private, due . , " shall be provided with a minimum of one to variation in typical hours of operation. If parking space per unit or guest bedroom, shared use of existing parking is proposed, plus any required parking for other associ- a letter of no objection from the owner of ated uses. the parking area to be shared shall be (d) Residential uses shall be provided with a provided. minimum of one parking space per unit. (c) The number of available offstreet parking (e) Community service uses and places of as- spaces within 600 feet for employee park- sembly, miscellaneous public/semipublic ing and 400 feet for visitor parking, owned uses, and warehousing uses shall comply or leased by the applicant for offsite pazk- with the parking schedule provided in sec- ing space, provided such site is under the 'tion 42.34(6). same ownership or there is provided evi- dence satisfactory to the city of a binding (f) For any unlisted use, the development code commitment of satisfactory duration to the administrator shall determine under which use of such parking for the principal use in of the preceding categories of parking reg- l question during its normal hours of opera- ulation the use fa ls or, if no category is Lion. Offsite parking arrangements may available, the code administrator shall de- include private and/or public parking spaces termine a formula that reasonably applies and shall provide for the city to be notified to the specific use. 60 days prior to the termination or cancel- (4) It is hereby declared to be the intent of this lation of any such arrangement. section to provide for sufficient flexibility in the (d) The number of parking spaces that should parking requirement formula so as to allow for be added or subtracted based upon unusual consideration of individual situations and more or special conditions unique to a particular innovative solutions to the provision of offstreet use or based upon specialized programs parking. Consistent with this intent, once the such as carpooling or public transit oppor- number of spaces required to serve a given use is tunities and requirements for employees or identified, the city, in conjunction with the appli- visitors. cant, will review the existing or proposed public (e) The amount of money offered as payment parking available to serve the proposed use, such - in lieu of providing required offstreet park- unusual or special conditions or provisions as ing space, such payment to be based upon might be unique to the use, and the desire and an estimated initial per space or annual ability of the city to participate in any joint operating and maintenance cost set by res- undertaking to provide parking space. In deter- olution of the city commission and subject mining compliance with the above offstreet park- to review at intervals of not more than two ing requirements, the following specific factors years. In establishing the process for pay- may be taken into account and applied toward the ment in lieu of parking, the city commis- number of required parking spaces: sion shall designate the responsible depart- (a);, The number of available offstreet public ment or authority charged with. receiving -' parking spaces that typically record less moneys and establishing a fund to be uti- J than a 90-percent utilization rate, as deter- li zed' exclusively for the provision of capital Supp. No. 14 CD40:68.1 'a r? ZONING 2. Cornice height - The vertical distance from ground level (top of finished side- walk) to the top of the exterior cornice, used to determine visual building height at sidewalk property lines. (Code 1980, § 135.145; Ord. No. 5235-92, § 1, 10-7-93; Ord. No. 5597-94, § 1, 9-1-94; Ord. No. 5962-96, § 1, 8-15-96) Sec. 40.489. Development requirements for the Eastern Corridor subdis- trict. - (1) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numerical require- ments shall apply to development within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the urban center district: (a) Maximum density: 70 dwelling units or hotel/motel units per gross acre. § 40.489 (b) Maximum floor area ratio: 3.0. (c) Maximum height: 150 feet; the required cornice heights of the design guidelines shall be observed. (d) Setbacks: In both subdistricts, all new str0= ture shall observe the required build-to lines of the design guidelines. There are not side or rear setback requirements. (e) Offstreet parking: Offstreet parking and loading requirements within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict shall be the same as within the Core subdistricts. (f) Bonus provisions. Floor area ratio, height and density may be increased according to the following schedule. Floor Area Ratio, Height and Density Bonus Requirements (All Must Be Met) FAR - Up to 4.0 -The development is a mixed use project incorpc' Height - Up to 180 feet. rating pedestrian-interest uses (see section 4-.486(6)) Density - Up to 85 residential or hotel/motel on the ground floor with residential, hotel/motel, units per. gross acre. and/or office uses on the upper floors. -The structure and style design is determined to substantially contribute to the architectural char- acter of the area by the design review board. -EITHER: The amenity area provided for in sub- section (2) below is increased to 30% of the lot area; OR The development contains a residential component of at least 30% of the total development floor area, with at least 20% of the total number of residential uses being affordable housing. (2) Amenity area. Properties shall be provided with ground level amenities which positively con- tribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the urban center district, in accordance with the following schedule: Floor Area Ratio 0.5-1.0 Greater than 1.0 Minimum Amenity Area (Percentage of Lot Area) 5 10 All amenity areas shall be designed to be used by the public and shall be located adjacent to street rights-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street rights-of-way. Such improvements may Supp. No. 14 CD40:68.3 UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS occur in such a manner that views of Old Tampa Bay are not unreasonably obstructed or dimin- ished from Bayshore Boulevard: (1) No wall or fence in excess of three feet in height shall be permitted. (2) No hedge or other grouping of shrubs in excess of three feet in height shall be planted. (Ord. No. 5040, § 1, 10-4-90) Sec. 42.31_. Uses within accident potential hazard area of airport. Notwithstanding any other provision contained in this development code, within the accident potential hazard area of the airport there shall be no new or expanded high density residential use, high density hotel or motel use, school, hospital, church or other use which concentrates or congre- gates large numbers of people, and there shall be no storage of explosive or hazardous material or other use that creates the potential for a major catastrophe in the event of an aircraft crash. (Code 1980, § 136.005(e)) Cross reference-Airports and aircraft generally, ch. 4. Sec. 42.32. Uses interfering with aircraft. Notwithstanding any other provision contained in this development code, no use may be made of land or water in a manner that interferes with the operation of an airborne aircraft. Furthermore: (1) No use of lights or illumination shall be so arranged or operated in a manner that is misleading or dangerous to aircraft. (2) No use shall produce smoke, glare or other visual hazard to aircraft within three stat- ute miles of the airport. (3) No use shall produce electronic interfer- ence with navigational signals or radio communication between the airport and aircraft. (4) All structures with a height of 200 feet or more shall be equipped with warning lights in accordance with Federal Aviation Admin- istration Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, as amended. (Code 1980, § 136.005(d)) Cross reference Airports and aircraft generally, ch. 4. § 42.34 Sec. 42.33. Stormwater detention facilities. (1) The development standards and design spec- ifications relating to stormwater drainage and detention, copies of which are maintained on file in the office of the city clerk and in the public works department, are hereby adopted and incor- porated in this Code by reference. The standards and specifications shall not be amended except by ordinance. (2) Stormwater detention facilities required by the standards and specifications but which, in the opinion of the;city engineer, would be impractical or ineffective because of the size of the property, the space available for stormwater detention fa- cilities, soil conditions or other site-related condi- tions may be waived at the request of the devel- oper upon payment to the city of a fee in lieu thereof which shall be used by the city solely for drainage improvements in the drainage basin in which the property is located. Such fees shall be determined by the market value of the area of land which would have otherwise been required to accommodate a stormwater detention facility, according to an appraisal made by the city or by a property appraiser holding either an MAI or SRPA designation, at the option of the property owner, and by the construction value of the stormwater detention facility that would have otherwise been provided, such construction value to be deter- mined by, the city engineer. Subject to the ap- proval of the city engineer, the developer may install a portion of the required stormwater de- tention facilities and pay the city a fee in lieu of installation of the remaining portion of the facil- ities. (Ord. No. 5105, § 1, 8-29-91) Cross reference-Stormwater management generally, § 32.241 et seq. Sec. 42.34. Parking. (1) Purpose. It is the purpose of this section to establish standards which promote the orderly, efficient, and safe layout of parking areas de- signed to complement the use they serve. (2) Building permit. A building permit shall be required for: (a) Any proposed new parking lot; Supp. No. 11 CD42:23 UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS § 42.34 PARKING STANDARDS Supp. No. 11 .A.- B.IC ID IE. F IG 0 8 0 8 0 12 0 23 O Z8 0 . . . . . - 9.0 19.8 13.0 12.7 52.5 46,2 45 9.5 1 20.1 13.0 113.4 53.2 46.5 I 10.0 20.5 13.0 14.1 54.0 46.9 G F D 9.0 20.4 12.0 11.7 SZ.8 41.0' Z' 50 9.5 20.7 12.0 12.4 53.4 47.3 , 10.0 21.0 12.0 ,13-1 54.0 47.6 c ' -& .... - 9.0 21.0 18.0 10.4 60.0 55,5 }-E •-j 60 9.5 21.2 19.0 1 1.0 60.4 55.6 -- 10.0 21.5 18.0 11.5 61.0 56.0 70 9.0 9.5 1 21.0 2.1.2 19.0' 18.5 9.6 10.1 61.0 60.9 57,9 57.1 PARKING ANGLE A (DEGREES) 10.0 2 1.2 10.0 10.6 60.4 57.0 B STA T WI T .) LL D H (F 0.3 24.0 9.1 64.6 62.7 C STALL TO GUFB (FT.) . 0.4 Z 24.0 9.6. 64.8 62.7 D AISLE WIDTH (FT.) $ 0 10.2 65.0 63.3 • E CURB LENGT H (FT.) 9.0 119.0 24.0 9.0. 62.0 - MIN. OVERALL DOUBLE F ROW WITH AISLE 90 9.5 19,0 24.0 9.5 G2.0 - BETWEEN (FT.) MO O 24,0 10.0 62 0 - G STALL CENTER (FT ) : . CD42:25 UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 42.34 2. Supp. No. 13 e. Group care facilities: One parking space per three occupants at max- imum capacity, including resident employees and supervisors. f. Congregate care facilities: One parking space per two dwelling units, plus one space per two em- ployees. g. Residential shelters: One parking space per seven residents, based 'on maximum occupancy approved by the city. A minimum of one space shall be required for each shelter. h. Bed and breakfast inns: One park- ing space per each bedroom de- voted to the bed and breakfast use. i. Elderly and low income dwellings constructed with funds provided through the local public housing authority, the city economic devel- opment department, or other en- tity recognized by the city as a provider or elderly or low income housing: One parking space per dwelling unit for detached single- family, two-family, or three-family dwellings, and three-fourths park- ing space per dwelling unit for multiple-family dwellings. Retail sales and service uses. a. Individual retail sales and retail complexes with less than 25,000 square feet of gross floor area: Parking or stora, a spaces for all vehicles used directly in the con- duct of such business, plus five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. b. Shopping centers, retail complexes, or individual retail sales with more than 25,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area: Four and one- half parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. c. Theaters, indoor and outdoor rec- reation centers, swimming pools, CD42:29 skating rinks and other public or private recreation and amusement facilities: One parking space per three customers or patrons com- puted on the basis of maximum servicing capacity at any one time, as determined by the require- ments of the city, plus one addi- tional space for every two persons employed on the premises at a peak period of use. Specific provi- sions over and above the standard .may be required for uses such as movie theaters involving succes- sive changes of patrons with a corresponding overlap in parking required. d. Bowling alleys: Five parking spaces per lane. e. Restaurants: One parking space per 100 square feet of gross floor area including any outdoor seat- ing area. f. Carryout, drive-through or other fast food restaurants: 13 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area including any out- door seating area. g. Vehicle service: Parking or storage space for all vehicles used directly in the conduct of the business, plus four spaces for each service bay or similar facility or area, plus one space per two persons em- ployed on the premises. Each ser- vice bay shall be permitted to count as one space. h. Funeral homes: Five parking spaces per parlor unit or one space per four seats, whichever is the greater. i. Barbershop or beauty salon: Two parking spaces per barber chair or three parking spaces per beauti- cian chair based upon the maxi- mum servicing capacity at one time. j. Personal service establishments not otherwise specified: Five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4 42.3 space for all vehicles used directly sions are subject to the approval of th( in the operation of such establish- traffic engineer. Standing or stacking space: ment, plus four parking spaces per for drive-through facilities shall be de 1,000 square feet of total floor area. signed to accommodate all vehicles onsib 0 b- Private clubs, lodges or other or- without obstructing any aisles or parking ganizations - of a. fraternal, civic, spaces. `union-related, religious or similar (b) Schedule. Any use identified below shag nature: One parking space per 30 provide offstreet loading as specified: square feet used for assembly, din- mg, meetings or other specific use 1. Offices or community service establish of the club facilities. ments: One loading space shall be pro c. Commercial marinas: One-half vided for each such building, including parking space per slip except slips schools, medical or dental clinics, au ` , with live-aboard vessels which shall d itoriums or clubs, etc., having greater be required one parking space per than 6,000 square feet of gross floo3 slip. space. d. Hospitals: 0.85 parking space per 2. Apartments: Apartment buildings shalt employee on duty at any one shift be provided with one loading space pet change or 0.65 space per fulltime 200 units or fraction thereof of one-hag; equivalent total employment, or more. whichever is greater, plus addi- 3. Hotels and motels: Hotel/motel devel- tional parking spaces for visitors opments shall be provided with one on the basis of 0.6 space per hos- loading space per 200 units or fraction pital bed. thereof over one-half. In addition, au- 6. Industrial establishments. tomobile and taxi loading and standing a. Warehousing: One space per 1,500 spaces may be required by the traffic square feet of gross floor area. engineer. b. Fabricating, processing, and man- 4. Commercial or industrial uses: Any ufacturing: One space per 400 building containing 5,000 square feet square feet of gross floor area or or more of gross floor area designed or six-tenths space per employee, adaptable for commercial or industrial whichever is greater. use shall be provided with loading space ?. Other uses. For any unlisted use, the in accord with the following table: development code administrator shall Total Grass Floor Area determine under -which of the preced- gin square feet) Loading Spaces ing categories of parking regulation 5,000 to 15,000 1 the use falls or, if no category is avail- Over 15,000 to 50,000 2 able, the code administrator shall de- Over 50,000 to 100,000 3 termine a formula which reasonably Each additional 100,000 1 additional applies to the specific use. 5. Drive-through facilities. a. For restaurants: Drive-through fa- (7) Offstreet loading and standing spaces. cilities for restaurants shall be pro- (a) Design. Offstreet loading spaces shall mea- vided with sufficient standing or sure not less than 12 feet in width and 35 stacking space to accommodate feet in length, exclusive of aisle and ma- eight vehicles. neuvering space, and shall have a vertical b. For banks: Drive-through facili- clearance of at least 14 feet; the location ties for banks shall. be provided and any variation of the preceding dimen- with standing space in accordance Supp. No. 11 CD42:31 UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The parking of vehicles, boats and trail- ers in residential areas shall be subject to the parking restrictions regardless of the date such parking commenced .and shall not be deemed an allowable nonconforming use within the mean- ing of section 42.21. (10) Handicapped parking spaces. All new or expanded uses shall be provided with handi- capped parking spaces based upon the number of spaces required to serve the new or expanded use, as follows: Number of Spaces Number of Required Handicapped Spaces 1-4 0 5-25 1 26--50 2 51-75 3 76-100 4 101-150 5 151-200 6 201-300 7 301-400 8 401-500 9 501-1,000 2 percent of total Over 1,000 20 plus 1 for each 100 over 1,000 All handicapped parking spaces shall be conspic- uously outlined in blue paint and posted and maintained with permanent above-grade signs of a color and design consistent with standards established by the state department of transpor- tation, bearing the international symbol of acces- sibility and the caption "PARKING BY DIS- ABLED PERMIT ONLY." The ra4uired number of handicapped parking spaces sliall be included in the total number of parking spaces required for the new or expanded use. All handicapped park- ing spaces shall be designed and located in accor- dance with the standards set forth in F .S. § 316.1955(3), as the same may be amended from time to time. (11) [Reserved. ] (12) Conformance to uniform system of park- ing lot design and traffic control devices. Nongov- ernmental entitles to which the public is invited to travel shall meet or exceed the parking lot § 42.35 design standards of rule 14-110, Florida Admin- istrative Code. Such entities shall also install and maintain uniform traffic control devices at appro- priate locations pursuant to the standards set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as adopted by the Department of Trans- portation under rule 14-15.010, Florida Adminis- trative Code. Businesses with parking lots that do not provide intersecting lanes of traffic and busi- nesses having fewer than 25 parking spaces are exempt from the provisions of this section. (Code 1980, § 136.022; Ord. No. 5101, § 7,6-20-91; Ord. No. 5235-92, § 2, 10-7-93; Ord. No. 5512-94, § 1, 2-17-94; Ord. No. 5632-94, § 3, 10-20-94; Ord. No. 5754, § 17, 1-19-95; Ord. No. 5806-95, § 4, 5-18-95; Ord. No. 5820-95, § 1, 9-7-95; Ord. No. 5992-96, § 2, 5-2-96; Ord. No. 6068-96, § 1, 9-5-96) Cross reference--Stopping, standing and parking gener- ally, § 30.041 et seq. Sec. 42.35. Uses involving vehicles. (1) No recreation vehicle, travel trailer, camper or like unit shall be used for living; sleeping or housekeeping purposes within any zoning district except within an approved recreational vehicle park and at designated city-owned public parking facilities, in the four-block area surrounding the Harborview Center in accordance with rules es- tablished jointly by the management of the Harborview Center and the city commission of the City of Clearwater, and with the express permission of the management of the Harbor-view Center and a delegee of the city commission. (2) No vehicle shall be parked within any park- ing lot primarily for the purpose of displaying such vehicle for sale, unless the lot is approved for vehicle sales consistent with the terms of this development code. (3) No repair of any vehicle is permitted in any residential zoning district unless such repair is either confined within a completely enclosed build- ing or limited to minor vehicle repair. Under no circumstance shall such repair be conducted as a business or for profit. (Code 1980, § 136.005(a)-(c); Ord. No. 5956-95, § 2,2-15-96) Cross reference-Traffic and motor vehicles generally, ch. 30. Supp. No. 14 CD42:33 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared at the r equest of the 00 SI ILIT-d CflURCfl Of SCIINTOLoGr RELIGIOUS TRUST AINISTIRIAL TRAINING AND PASTORAL COUNSELING [ENTER ORIGINAL REMPAID o l 2a0? October 1,997 SEP PLANNING DEPARTMENT MSI Project 97033 Cfly OF CLMWATER .l _i Prepared By: Submitted to: LL 0 Ms I ViARKHAM-STUKES INC 19007 North 56th St, Suite 210 T A RA P A, F L 0 R I D- A Clearwater /,?, , c -., , 41 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Pre-Project Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Post-Project Conditions Trip Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lo Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Post-Project Intersection Levels of Service . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2I) Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Initial Intersection Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Table 2: Growth Rate Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table 3: Intersection Levels of Service, Pre-Project Conditions . . 6 Table 4: -Crash Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Table 5: Comparison of Trip Generation Calculations . . . . . . I I Table 6: Amount of Church Transit Use . . . . . . . I 1 Table 7: Effect of Transit Use on Total Project Trips . . . . . . . 12 Table 8: Direction of Travel,. Employees and Students . . . . . . 13 Table 9: Comparison of Pre-Project and Post-Project Conditions . 17 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Study Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Figure 2: Project Vicinity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Figure 3: Pre-Project Peak Hour Traffic (Existing Geometry) . . . 7 Figure 4: Pre-Project Peak Hour Traffic (Asymmetrical Pair) . . . 8 Figure 5: Project Trips (Existing Geometry) . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 6: Project Trips (Asymmetrical Pair) . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Figure 7: Project Bus Trips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 8: Post-Project Peak Hour Traffic (Existing Geometry) 18 Figure 9: Post-Project Peak Hour Traffic (Asymmetrical Pair) 19 Appendix A . . . . . . . Raw Traffic Counts and Traffic Projections Appendix B . . . Highway Capacity Analysis of Pre-Project Conditions Appendix C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary of Crash- Data ,% Appendix D . . Highway Capacity Analysis of Post-Project Conditions INTRODUCTION The Church of Scientology has proposed a new six-story Ministerial Training -and Pastoral Counseling Center for downtown Clearwater. Designed in a Spanish-influenced style to match the old Fort Harrison Hotel, the new 'Center will house administrative offices, training and study facilities, a church museum, an in-house cafe, recreational facility for church members, and a small worship chapel: It will occupy the entire city block bounded by Fort Harrison Avenue, Pierce Street, Garden Avenue, and Franklin Street. A parking garage is proposed- for an adjacent parcel, facing Garden Avenue between Court-Street and Franklin Street. Project completion is scheduled for 1999. Figure 1 shows the study area and the location of the proposed buildings. Figure 2 shows the project vicinity in greater detail. This study has been commissioned to evaluate existing traffic conditions, estimate the effect of new development on the surrounding roadway network, and determine what type of roadway or traffic improvements may be necessary to mitigate traffic impacts from the new Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center. As requested by City of Clearwater staff, an initial evaluation was conducted of all signalized intersections in the nearby area. Based on this initial evaluation, summarized in Table 1 below, some intersections were eliminated from further study in this report. Table 1 Initial Intersection Evaluation Crashes Pre-Project Jan-June Distance from Expected Detailed Analysis Intersection LOS 1995 1996 1997 Project (miles) Pr_ oiect Traffic Necessary Myrtle at Cleveland B 7 14 5 1/4 some yes Myrtle at Pierce B 2 1 1 1/4 some yes Myrtle at Court B 7 3 3 1/4 little yes Myrtle at Chestnut B 0 0 0 1/4 Tittle yes Myrtle at Druid B 4 2 2 1/2 very little no Myrtle at Lakeview 1 1 1 more than 1 very little no Ft. Harrison at Cleveland B 10 8 1 less than 114 some yes Ft.. Harrison at Pierce A 4 0 0 less than 1/4 some yes Ft. Harrison at Court less than F 3 6 0 less than 114 little yes Ft. Harrison at Chestnut B 10 6 4 less than 1/4 little yes Ft. Harrison at Druid B 7 7 6 12 very little no Ft. Harrison at Lakeview B 5 4 3 more than 1 very little no Cleveland at Garden B 1 2 0 less than 1/4 some yes Cleveland at East B 0 1 0 less than 1/4 some yes Franklin at Myrtle C 3 1 0 less than 1/4 some yes Franklin at Ft. Harrison C 0 0 0 less than 114 some yes " Data not available for analysis Source: MSI analysis. Seph•mberAdobar. 1997 Winisterial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Construction of the Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center will have no significant effect on existing traffic conditions in downtown Clearwater if the existing street configuration is retained. Under the City's proposed asymmetrical pair street configuration, which will require modifications to Ft. Harrison Avenue and Myrtle Street, we-expect traffic from the Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center to create congestion only at the intersection of Myrtle Street and Cleveland Street. This congestion can be eliminated by adcfing a southbound left turn traffic signal phase of minimum duration. Since this congestion only occurs under the asymmetrical pair configuration, no traffic signal improvements are necessary unless the asymmetrical pair configuration is built. The City has expressed interest in analyzing the need for a northbound right turn lane on Ft. Harrison Avenue at Pierce Street. Future post-project peak hour traffic estimates show only fourteen vehicles making this turn tinder the-existing roadway configuration, and only ten vehicles making this turn under the. asymmetrical pair configuration. No vehicles generated by the Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center are expected to make this turn. Given these low volumes, and that no project vehicles will be making this turn, we cannot justify a specific need for this separate right turn lane. Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center Page 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ADDITIONAL SERVICES CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared for: City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Prepared by: Markham-Stukes, Inc. 11007 North 56th Street, Suite 210 Tampa, Florida 33617 August, 1999 Approved by:_ I I--- 4? Richard F. Ranck, P.E. Florida Registration 945978 I --f .j _l lI 1 a: -" y ux L `1 J Aso SUN-SETTj t_a35^" soN..AU.- E" < P `rN T 1 z covA. u. ?s....l atia 7 HARBORSID TeVE AVUSC?< . zn G S?AInG..1'-.v. G / 1 ( •a._? ¦. I .n' ; i U(STA 6 ?JCEI LV. ?_. 1EkETIAH.I?. >t z N. 1G_ Q¢, POINT R _ "<.= G Z, aEVrLi5 ? N1GJyCANG ! ?'V J \ I$. . 3 . > SAh OY LANC SNCPPING L °EaU" ELS:u w?C1. -O ev^<,5- .I ¢5v ?`Ui Sr B ?C?ols= e Q n LN ¦? rE gv?C3t'G.ry L:v ?C?° I. aas E55 6.s`A c 4a. O . i S_ANOYO"t N? P P` ARD TOWER, CLIPPER C UE ! s ?? LEasaS ? P JF 999 < :;MARY_L.RO` a 'GaovE' RST " " r 2 V'G <> . .'fEAAACE_F ¦. rpovE. RC clsc 33315 WAY J F c` ° 3r AIRMONT o c 6 4y X:NGS3t z: ?R SAMUEL Al. ;iO6JVSON /, ... ? ? r T ;E_REA n N .. SLAND AC;E.?N.rrvESCHcoL ?i 3cc}_-SIB.11;qSn ,.,«s:...?f',P ?c^iT=?.. - ,t I EST. J ,K ' . 3 AHKNlQaO T > ! 1 , uaq..,ALs .¦ it . a. trCC' s o a W00081N < y, 3'---BAISLA 0, HERITAGE •_2a JQAY } C i I .Q _ .: `-< Aar •-crv _ `.v _ ; ¦ a _NGOALE..- T :-- TT.?., ?Q p4.S c I i \ ! c ' _ > < RUSS`I_L Z AI - crrArl _L > s <. 15C A, •n ?; cQ ` Z I ,?`U'! PAL ,j' ST z ?. ?NG!.+ta ANG..TwJ -z?T <<tiJ......._... ?...... ._._.U -v 'A i E t1ALL!-J' I .? I / TO 2 N J.` - ..N :.1E.'.'=.?. Y = ¦ -- $ I ?INE- K UJ' I OF 3 .. B ?4 ^ _,?lA.a nti L T sc:+cc_ a lNG -A OR ¦S 04P?vG? +: cn F : urk y ?... ..._...<_ ..A SAIL- S < N/IN V >J J I c _ ¦ ?,<:GhaG7 ^O Cc'N.'_.4 ^ 1 . D . SS GE s _ - _ anal .cccsoN _.v c` Q G.. TY avJA rER ? o? ¦151 IS4A Q A ( Lj / Cr '? ?GEvs sr > < <cCFI=R? ,v5•vE IsI Cu;. $ N LEA Q ¢ 3c f I -+I=15Cu M PlA SC Q . SeMJNOLE ST Cg ME r0 S CCL g- -!Ia1ScE:S STS cEn a BaATBA _QARQ S- PALMETTO ¦ ¦L'SAA?Y ?. ST aC COAS r GUA 9 ^ JACK .a:1.i5E:C , srArpN IIJJJ z f >\ ' _ $C ? W v!C'OLSON O? ,-r,auM NICHOLSC 1 >" - f ... i \ NcRrrl WAR,- T .... s z 3 SEMINOLE < ST ST GEL I I ELEM. ?. ?• .. ?' ..... 1 > > CCGA ai_.? > >-. Q HARBOR BLUFFS!•.._ `. ELDRIOG? a . o t C: C,-`MA : < ., z !L MAPc,ST ?a z^ cOUNr y <- : }???? I ar z ?L aT z... L_T - c_Ja? o r F _ :Z......?:' _° _ .... MAPLE 1 < G (J,E? /?\4 I GEAR !A C E. . ZP U S ^ o> n .... F" ¢ vi _........ ? _ < .T> 5 JACARAVOA CIA N AV ACKSON 0 :1 4,q T }CCEARwA TE'• L ST CLEA ATER- :?ORACA;;ArIGA PIN FERRY I cJ+AMBtR O JONES _ ..._S I_ .. ... KEHWOOD DREW LARo-ovv_aiJV > C;R S- Oq " +?-?'-?_ C RE a SST -GARDENS GARD S?$A?Ei?oq`s pRes RErWw ?a ?F\A aacr?rLl Z QGROVE = 590 ==0N' -, • - qy _ ARI ¦ <u EJiO ' .O >..... 4V - N $ ^>•"J } < GROVE > (? \\ P L/BRAAv AA =.aLAUAA rG\.E?;t_ 'LAUAAS .'<< _ -= Z3...> ¦ " .... .' CLEVE AN'D ST- = •?- Z LA O I < PA K: POCIC_ z CJrr AC €¦ -, _:/ LA' - PLA 1. LA S'rA71CJC .. "S:.CP uK'+ C! I PffRCF 1' - al cF .1- c sr ¦ccx J ?,; -? 1 FACE r..._ ^TC?.- BAYFRCIVr ARE ncw - ., -> ^ < LICE 60 .... C \\O -- F "ANKLIN. CJ i ?<?< ^4ANKV < r PwfCLASCOhN- C^c HOUSE O :-_.....- - z> 1. c ? CIR .< .. FRANKL, SE. .3 \L'' COURT ST .3GOULO ".......Sr: -:ilAcc`ECN'O s.r> \v RELUDE E-CHESTN T aRCV,N_ 7- ? `FlOSA"0? SC?iSAANJUAN? s: Q ? ?, • i?cS,,;.as ? _, ?.. - I CO" RT $T - cs ?r<'' ?` - _ ST . - ! > 1 ROGEA$ ST. J ACM. ¢ ¢ ,i!iaac.'?c . _ _..... _. _. ...z?DLF•..: Cy EN ¦aAKS = OGERS ST C S- . ? GoL= V%W couRS? TURNER . ST =?!MEO" a s'...'.^a crF, PINE ST PIN <PINE1 ... Z ST SPO TTIJWCOOE -' i _ ' D= of SPOrTISwoOOE ' I SPOTTISWOODE LN o JAs?+INe- SOL", 'Lu ?l > o 7;.: ? rVr_C? / MAGNOLIA .. .. ELEV. OR. O =: J} Y'RIN y .> ?,AS 1.n... G HARBOR ..? ... ??ec r.JC? ^ r 2. v < N< •e 1 LOTUS ?' t7' -CIR S MAGNOL!s Z Q PATH Lv s, ,al y - C 'rr < ai - Q MAGXCLJA Z OAKS O _?3 W MALL ` V LOT-St1J' u ?Rc ..... ?'FC <.? . _ } Sr'aPF:? ......PA_i 9. .. _..;?lO?I:S'i aa;l•.? ....? ¦ A}pF7 iaN Nr.4ps iAt.¦ cLEA,awA:-F4 CrrrtlMTrs _ pRUlo SACLE?c? <.... ANO vCcNTA ¦.O _? •c:-- - ..T - --------- ---- - ?Prc: i ...BARRY _ --- C aICYCER-r rN G PWELLAS. 95 ° HIA =- in -E:vr ' z Z Y= P'Q• ¢."r-Q ._..._ ..... c ......SNEUGE LEAS T!4 < C I _A7KrN5 AJ _ _' -;J« `_a ?- , •r. MILTON $T---.. _{?- R/GYLANO ya z ?Z -- r ¦ 1> o < ..... } BAONJ IN(:iS PLAZA a CoRBETT > SI. y LAKE D lEW ? M7?NG ¦ 8 < ?< " ST cENrE. AMBLESIOE - - ' 8 Sin CE W. a. 5? , -Y - y -- -- R`P?U f °p A1EL0 \¦ Q?' NO?.`JANUrY PAAK . V COE RO ¦ CO v =5 y > a 'lip _ caL=- _ c SuMa _ a I NG b O tBellevle < Islan }? C? y o = ccuRSE :. .__S.T_ >( nor zi > c e = OMAN O.fir'b p ?Oa? `AC LHNNONaZL - S/f .SL hCProN u ear=J Cf " BELLEVIEW ; s PARKA NAR EYa ?? s' -- ??` W "-?I TEMPLE ST L 09 BLVD .. w ?'' 4= 'AONT H AAISLN'?A BELL EV:EbyBIVD'; K 1 CITRUS ST ILOw o psi wv >'za_:..,-RCUNc wiwaMr _r LEMON ST I Z. > L_ w wN c.? r « C <' i r 8REEZ 8s, =vl6w ,j ' axr),aRC c M< 2 >• :.a? oiyca-,O?. .,? -'n `PS L'ASERy < a: Figure Study Location I,1cI" J Tabfe I Comparison of PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Calculations Original Proposed Trip Building Use Trip Generation Trip Generation Increase General Office 303 404 141 j (as Corp HQ) General Office 374 491 117 (as STO) 1 Original Gross Revised Gross Tries Trips As Corp HQ 628 729 As STO 713 830 Peak hour trips will be reduced by future church transit use. Table 2 illustrates the anticipated net PM peak hour trips using the same trip reduction rates as was used in the original report. Table 2 Effect of Transit Use on Total Project Trips Gross PM Trip Reduction due Net PM ' Trip Generation Method Peak Hour Trips to Transit Use Pk Hr Trips Corporate HQ by sq ft 729 462 267 Single Tenant Office by sq ft 830 530 300 The total trip generation based on these revisions is still lower than the original Walker Parking consultants study estimate of 1025 vehicles. Therefore, the trip generation estimates used in the original traffic impact study is applicable and are used in trip distribution in this report.. Trip Distribution Trips generated from the proposed center (1025 trips) were distributed onto the adjacent street system as described in the original. report. Trips were distributed from the garage, which has a proposed driveway on Franklin Street. In the original report, two trip distribution scenarios were developed: one using the existing geometric configuration of the adjacent street system and one which considered a proposed asymmetrical. pair geometry for Fort Harrison Avenue and Myrtle Street- 4 c _ ( 60 c ti . l_ 35 N o.N nM? ? c? .n J -4'42 _ ( J L -672 14 -633 155 N - 59 3'0 CLEVELAND J L - I_ J 653 , 17 ?- 45 476 , r 99 ` STREET J , -- - 4 - j 5?° 1 I ! 726- i 25 1 ©? © I I Nov 12 Q In I3 ---- M P ? PARK STREET j = W CC: Q W 2 ~ O Q Z C C j Q ?t1 C7 Q 0 N W ID -?- 10 ( J L - 40 PIERCE 21 J STREET 69 N tD - W PROJECT S1 TE t_ 13 J(L . 10 FRANKLIN 1 j I - N m lD - STREET m m - . N ti J ( 357 36 r- 125 COURT F - V Iff 1 P f1 - STREET 41 l!'I . i L - ? CHESTNUT 83 -' STREET 593- 196 Q . D = 0 o - GARAGE tD' V t(1 ' - . ?- 29 J(L 419 55-' 38 ;mom D m LIJ :W c o In J(L -4 r- 3 32 r a41 -1 v - _P N:. 65 398 1 - 47 N 1( to Ul +1 lA _ ? M L ,n { ?r 76 ---1 ( I 797 - 4 3 -1 D o+ u EXISTING GEOMETRY Figure 3: Pre-Project-1999 Peak Hour Traffic ms l 1 J CLEVELAND STREET PARK N , I y STREET o W z W T cz ct: W LU s PIERCE S TREET r 8 a PROJE C T SITE --j LQ BUS l DAD I NG R A EA FRANKLIN STREET PARKING GARAGE 9 `- : 7 COURT STREET CHESTNUT 4 STREET Figure 5-: Peak Hour-Project Bus. Trips MS1. Traffi"c. Impacts In the original report, the following intersections were analyzed Myrtle at Cleveland Myrtle at Pierce Myrtle at Court Myrtle at Chestnut Fort Harrison at Cleveland Fort Harrison at Pierce Fort Harrison at Court Fort Harrison. at Chestnut Cleveland at. Garden Cleveland at East Franklin at Myrtle Franklin at Fort Harrison Of these, the intersections of Myrtle at Court, Myrtle at Chestnut, and Franklin at Myrtle are anticipated to be influenced by the relocation of the garage. A level of service analysis based on the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) of these three intersections was conducted for the post project condition. Table 3 summarizes the previous analysis results with the updated ones. The HCS analyses have been included. Table 3 Intersection Levels of Service Comparison of Conditions Existing Geometry Intersection Pre-Project Post Project (orig nal)Post Project (revised) Myrtle at Court B B B Myrtle at Chestnut B B B Franklin at Myrtle (1) C F F The intersection of Franklin and Myrtle is unsignalized. The Level of Service summarized above is for the sidestreet movements. HCS does not model unsignalized intersections well. As discussed in the previous report, many acceptable gaps should be presented to drivers waiting at Franklin Street. It is expected that the intersection of Franklin and Myrtle will operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour. 10 APPENDIX i 1 NCM:SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.-4g: 08-03-1999 Markham - Stukes, Inc.. Streets:: (E-W) Court ----------(N-S) Myrtle. Analyst: MSI File Name: COURMYP.HC9 Area Type. CBD 8-3-99 PM peak. Comment: Post-Project Existing Geometry Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Lanes 0 0 0 0> 4 < 0 ---- 0>2-- -0-- - -0-- -2--<-0-- Volumes 47 413 71, 41 535 350 29 PHF or PK15 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 90- Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 z Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Parking N N N N N N Bus Stops 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (YIN) Y 14.5 s (YIN) Y 14.5 s (YIN) Y 16.0 Arr Type 4 4 a RTOR Vols 0 0 - 0 Lost Time. 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share Prop. Prot. ------------- ------------------------------- Signal Operations -------------- Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ED Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds. WB Left * SB Left Thru. * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right ED Right SB Right WE Right Green 30.OP Green 40.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 80 secs Pha ----------------- se combination-order: #1 #5 --------- Intersec --------------------- tion Performance Summary -------------- Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ---- ------- Ratio Ratio Delay LOS ----- Delay LOS WB LTR 2755 6887 0.236 0.400 10.8 B 10.8 B NB LT 1593 3034 0.42.2 0.525 6.5 B 6.5 B SE TR 1832 3489 0.241 0.52.5 5.7 B 5.7 B Intersection Delay = 7.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 ---------------------------- sec Critical v/c(x) _ 0.341 ---------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2..1g MYRFRAP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection I J 1 J ------------------------ -------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street. ---------------------------- ------------- WB --------- EB ------- Conflicting Flows: (vph.) ------------- 318 ---------- 215 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 955 1077 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 955 1077 Prob. of Queue-Free State: ---------------------------- 0.99 0.64 ------- Step 2: LT from-Major Street -------------------------- ------------ SB --------- ND --------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------ 637 --------- 430 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 780 1007 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 780 1007 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3800 3800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1900 . 1900 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: ---------------------------- 0.99 G.97 -------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street ------------ WB -------- EB J -- Conflicting Flows: vph). -------- 1096 ---- 1089 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 249 252 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 239 242 Prob. of Queue-Free State: ---------------------------- 0.98 0.96 -------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street ----------------------- ------------ WD -------- EB ------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------ 1084 -------- 108.7 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 215 214 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.92 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.60 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------------------------------------ 129 ------------ 202 -------- RF.LIGIOIIS TRUST Mr. Robert Tefft Planner Department City of Clearwater Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Flag Building 215 S Fort Harrison Ave FLS2006-04023 Dear Mr. Tefft, 4 December, 2006 For your information the required Fire Department Connection has been installed on the Flag Building, 215 South Fort Harrison Ave. As you know this is a condition of the recently issued Development Order for the building. Attached is a copy of the signed permit for this work. The final inspection was done by inspector James Keller this afternoon. If there are any questiopq?dn this please call me at any time at 638-9088. James Bond CBQRM OF SCZ6STOLOGY F ?0 ' r e " r MUNIC I , e POST .tee 3 x e PLEASE C k K ? Site Address X215 S < . , H PARCEL NO.:16-29-15-94896-000-0010 1 DOUGLAS"GLANZ FRONTLINE FIRE PROTECTION 10790 FLORENCE AVE THONOTOSASSA, FL 33592 813-986-4556 yy(? i P Y_ CITY OF CLEARW, IPAL'SERVICES BUILDING, 100' OFFICE BOX 4748; CLEARWAT Telephone (727) 562-4567 ' F AL1,562-4580,BEFORE MIDNIGH } i IUTH,MYRTLE-AVENUE ORIDA'33T58-4748 I L 5f A . aAARRISON AVE -' • t, t. FLFIR . 26614200011993 , XOL HILLS COUNTY # 18055 XCL CLWR REGISTRATION XWC 2ENFT-H 206831, - - - I Permit: Unknown Cost: $2,408.00 [FROIECT: FLAG BUILDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: INSTALL YARD (PUMP FOR FIRE SYSTEM) FDC Fees Include: 6 45 1?.; 52. - - NEXT DAY INSPECTION later colm/tm web c } PERMIT # BCP2006-11403 ISSUED: November 20, 2006 CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY RELIGI 319 S GARDEN AVE.. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 No Phone Proposed Use: Office Plumbing Q Roof = Clearing & Grubbing Q Building Tree Gas = Right of Way Q Electric Mechanical 0 NOTICE: BEFORE EXCAVATING NOTIFY THE "CALL SUNSHINE NOTIFICATION CENTER AT 1-800-432-4770 . F SIX MONTHS OR MORE, WITH NO SUCCESSFUL PLEASE NOTE: 1) F AUTHORIZED WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD O FORE INSPECTIONS, THE PERMIT SHALL BECOME INVALID. NEW PERMIT FEES MUST BE PAID BE WORK CAN RESUME. 2) NOTICE: IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE ENTITIES. OF PINELLAS COUNTY. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL 3) REVIEWED PLANS MAY CONTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO PERMIT CONDITIONS. 4) PERMIT AND PERMITTED PLANS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE JOB SITE IN A LOCATION VISIBLE AND ACCESSIBLE TO THE INSPECTOR. 5) APPLICANT OR CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO REQUEST INSPECTIONS IN A TIMELY MANNER. 6) CALL IN PROPER CODE FOR (ALL) FIRE INSPECTIONS. WARNING TO, OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A . NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN `ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF,,CQMMENCEMENT. PERMIT - TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE Pew a -UC,•r0 x. , wx ? { x t A 'F M - A . A"R i ' X l r A 's.... i ?' t?" `Y Yt ? Z r. t f r . . F T ?'` Sj J ?i` ? ? ? ? ( N•}1 ?r J d' ? L ' i.3 I B ? ; ` UIL E DI .,? r , ,? ' FOOTING 111 IN S RvEY SLAB u ROOF • is S '`f.IRE "> ; POOL . NTEL PROGRES FINALS m t J s a 7J '? ? STEEL- 4 , BtJILDWG Date: Date. Dat "fi r '4 ? iv iJ i rt e' TY34 3 ,i: ?? 'L ' ° n.,? ?ti„a. ' N,i• RAME D A e: ?? '. •,r Date. 1 r Date: 6+ ::' ?/ Date Y ? . . .: , } Da ??. . ti , . ';c nfi RYWALL SHEATHING ob ?. " te s' LATH >> . _ > _ ? . ELECTRICAL Date: .. Date: „ Data ELEC T RIC AL . ? Date. Date , Date Dam ti a } TEMP POLE UNDERGRND PLUMBI ; NG/GAS MECHA NICAL POOL FINAL PUi 1ST ROUGH 2ND ROUGH UNDEFtGRND S PLUMBING PLUMBING , ROUGH i„• Date: Date: Date: Q Date: ROUGH CEILING SEWER Date: Date: Date: Date: MECHANICAL FINAL HOODICOM ENGINEERING . s. _ POOL Date: Date: Date: ; Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: GAS SITE RF LANDSCAPE Date: Date: Date: 7 ] Date: Date: Date: Date: D LAND RESOURCES Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: ---------- - ------- Date: TRAFFIC Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: ENGINEERING Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: , DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY ROUGH FINAL Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date:. Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: ' Date: Date. Date• Date: Date + , Date: Date: Dom: Date: i i ° r w er 9 0 w LONG RANGr PLANNING DF.VFI.OPMF,NT RFVIF,W November 2, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICIi BOX 4748, CurARWATfR, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SFRVICI?S BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR"IliF AvF,NUF, CLFARWAT'FR, FLORIDA 33756 TI:LrPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Re: FLS2006-04023 (215 South Fort Harrison Avenue) Dear Mr. Bond: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a 345,859 square foot Place of Worship within the Downtown (D) District as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code. The DRC APPROVED this application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 2.13-acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of South Fort Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street; 2. That the subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the property is located within the Downtown Core character district; and 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the. Flexibility standards as per Section 2-902.K of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district. PRANK IIIMIARI), MAYOR Joii,N DmR%N, COUNcii.,.mr.%t :R I IO)-[ I IA>ui:rON, Cot No],,vI mIII:R B11-I JON;SON, COtiN<:II.NII::nIiseR Cmoii:N A. PiomRSEN, COt NCILMENIFIF:R "F(N1AL EMPLOYMENT AND Aid i:IR,NIATIVI? Aci'ION F,,\IPL(»rR" November 2, 2006 215 South Fort Harrison Avenue (Church of Scientology FLAG Building) - FLS2006-04023 Page 2 of 3 Conditions of Approval: 1. That on or before December 2, 2006, a freestanding Fire Department Connection must installed on site; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions are addressed; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans must be revised to include a detail of the proposed tree grates to confirm these will not become a hazard for the disabled; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans must be revised to depict the location of the grease trap (restaurant use in Flag building); 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the rights-of-way of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the City; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans must be revised to depict new valley gutter curb on east side of the Flag Building that shall be constructed as a concrete swale per Index #107; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans must be revised to depict the sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or as part of the project as being designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.); 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans must be revised to depict all damaged curbing that is to be replaced adjacent to the site; 9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, Lauren Westenburger, since he relocated the oak tree, shall review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees; 10. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a Radio Signal Booster System (800 MHz), as required per City of Clearwater Ordinance No. 7617-06, shall be installed. The specifications and design of the system will be subject to approval by the City of Clearwater Radio Communications Shop or its designee and the Development and Neighborhood Services Department; 11. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall deed to the City of Clearwater easements to protect City access to all unrestricted water lines, including pipes, fire hydrants and backflow preventors; 12. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be brought up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.); 13. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all damaged or missing curbing adjacent to projects shall be replaced or rehabilitated; 14. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit five (5) sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida with Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy; 15. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees are paid; 16. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not limited to electrical and water meters, is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 17. That the final design and colors of the buildings are consistent with the architectural elevations approved by Staff; 18. That all utilities including individual distribution lines will be installed and/or relocated underground; and 19. That if the project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements'and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense, and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. November 2, 2006 215 South Fort Harrison Avenue (Chh of Scientology FLAG Building) - FLS2006-04023 Page 3 of 3 I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, APPROVE your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. This approval is based upon, and must adhere to, those development plans received on October 27, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (by August 31, 2007) with all required certificates of occupancy being obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. An extension may be granted by the Community Development Coordinator for a period not to exceed one year and may be done only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Coordinator may approve one further extension not to exceed one year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for extension within the period of validity following the first extension. The issuance of this. Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain building permits or pay impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@plyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning Departmen6CD BIFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseSIFt Harrison Ave S 0215 -COS Flag Bldg (D) - Approve&Ft Harrison Ave S 0215 - Development Order 11-02-06.doc TM CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY Mr. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 October 27, 2006 Re: FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Flag Building Dear Mr. Tefft, Please accept this letter as owner responses to the following conditions for issuance of the above Development Order: Fire Department Condition Radio Signal Booster System (800 MHz) required per City of Clearwater Ordinance NO. 7617-06. The specifications and design of the system will be subject to approval by the City of Clearwater Radio Communications Shop or its designee and the Development and Neighborhood Services Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10-06-06 Not answered in letter to Robert Tefft. Response We acknowledge that we will comply with Clearwater Ordinance NO.7617-06 by designing and installing a Radio Signal Booster System, and that these plans will be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit Condition Clearances of 71/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are requred to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. 10-06-06 The consultation held with applicant and Fire Marshall Strong & asst. Fire Marshall Rickard allowed for the FDC to be placed on • • the building as a temporary fix but that an FDC in the yard be provided by Sept. 1, 2007. Response We acknowledge intent to comply with the required clearances for both the FDC and the fire hydrant. We do however, request some consideration for the existing fire hydrant and existing equipment on the Garden Ave. side. We also acknowledge that the permanent FDC will be in the yard and not mounted on the building. Land Resources Condition Have Lauren Westenberger, since he relocated the oak tree; review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. Response We agree to have the plans reviewed by Lauren or another professional arborist to ensure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. We understand that this review is a requirement of issuance of the building permit. Comment Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment shall be integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Clarify what mechanical equipment, if any, is to be located on the roof and the means by which it is integrated into the building design. 10/ 021 06:Revised plans do not address this comment. Response All of the equipment that will be installed on the roof is there now, including the cooling radiator for the emergency generator which is behind the center parapet of the east wall, and two ventilation fans, one behind each of the eastern elevator towers. A plan sheet of the. roof and equipment is included with this letter. As discussed, any parts of the radiator which can be seen from the ground will be painted the same color as the adjacent building structure. • • Comment The previous development approval was for a 323,600 square foot building and the proposal is for a 345,859 square foot building. Please clarify how and where the additional 22,259 square feet of building floor area was added to the building. 10/ 02106: Sufficient justification for the additional square footage has not been provided. It has been indicated that the square footage is a result of a basement addition from the original plans; however plans to account for this will need to be provided. Response A plan of the basement floor is included with this letter, showing the kitchen and dining room areas. As discussed, the 22,259 sf difference is approximately half the size of the overall basement floor. Comment With the change in square footage for the building, a further parking deviation will be necessary than that which was previously approved for the development. The 323,600 square foot building required a deviation to 2.5 parking spaces per 1, 000 square feet of gross floor area, whereas the proposed 345,859 square foot building requires a deviation to 2.339 parking spaces per 1, 000 square feet of gross floor area. Provide justification for this further deviation. Response The 22,259 sf difference is the expansion of the original basement in order to move the staff dining room there, at the request of then City Manager Mike Roberto, in order to reduce the pedestrian traffic generated by our staff at meal times. Since this difference is entirely staff dining facility, it does not generate any new parking need for two distinctly different reasons: 1) the staff using the dining rooms are the same ones working in the building and are already accounted for in the parking study and traffic study calculations, and 2) At the time of the earlier parking and traffic studies, a major program of staff transportation by bussing was planned, and has now been operating successfully since that time, resulting in the fact that only approximately 5% of staff drive downtown to work. By written policy of the Church, staff are required to use the mass transportation unless they have a specific reason to drive their own car to work. The use of this private transportation system can be observed daily on Watterson Avenue at the current staff dining room in the Clearwater Building. If there are ?uestions please contact me at 638-9088. Sincerely, dames Bond, Owner's Representative 0 41 E A L SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. 521 Chestnut Street Clearwater FL 33756 Phone (727) 466-6772 Fax (727) 466-6882 email kencrete(Waol.com FL Certificate of Authorization 7983 October 25, 2006 Mr. Steve Doherty City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Reference: Church of Scientology. Religious Trust New Flag Building 215 South Fort Harrison Avenue FLS 2006-04023 Subject: Transmittal of Additional Information Dear Mr. Doherty: Thank you for your comments of October 2, 2006 regarding the minimum clearance from the edge of the sidewalks. After our discussion today, we revised the appropriate sheets and offer an explanation of the revisions below. Engineering Condition: 1. We moved the tree grates to provide the minimum sidewalk width of 4 feet plus two feet of clearance. This applies to Franklin Street, Garden Avenue and Pierce Street. Dimensions are provided on Sheet C3.0 to indicate at least 6 feet from the tree in the tree grate to the planter wall or fence. 2. The sidewalk widths are shown along Franklin Street. The width is greater than the minimum. Included with this transmittal are 4 sets of revised plans (Sheets C3.0, C4.1 and 1-1.1 Latest revision 10/02/06). Please review the additional information for compliance with the conditions of the approval. Thank you. Sin y, E SUPPORT SE V S, INC. Kenneth H. Roush, P.E. FL License No. 33366 KHR:az -w • . r E & L SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. 521 Chestnut Street Clearwater FL 33756 Phone (727) 466-6772 Fax (727) 466-6882 email kencreteOaol.com FL Certificate of Authorization 7983 September 29, 2006 Mr. Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Reference: Church of Scientology Religious Trust New Flag Building RECEIVED 215 South Fort Harrison Avenue FLS 2006-04023 SEP 2 9 2006 Subject: Transmittal of Additional Information PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr. Tefft Thank you for your letter of September 1, 2006 that APPROVED the flexible standard application for this project, with conditions. We have addressed those conditions and respond to them below. The owner has. also prepared responses that accompany this letter. General Engineering ¦ We discussed this condition at the DRC of August 31, 2006. It was determined that the minimum safe horizontal clearances were being provided around the building as shown, so no further action was required. ¦ We've shown on Sheet C3.0 (latest revision 09/01/06) the horizontal sidewalk widths, complying with the 4' minimum on Pierce Street, Franklin Street and Garden Avenue, and the 5' minimum on Fort Harrison Avenue. Fire Department: • The FDC area has been identified with a sign "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" shown on Sheet C3.0 (latest revision 09/01/06). From previous meetings and discussions, the new FDC will be mounted on the wall. ¦ It is the intent of the owner that the 7.5 feet clearance in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, plus the 4' clearance to the rear, be in compliance with NFPA- 1, but the existing clearance to the south is 6.7 feet. Land Resources: ¦ The existing trees to remain are along Fort Harrison Avenue. Their canopies have been re-measured and shown on SheetsC3.0, C4.1, and 1-1.1. • Lauren Westenburger is working with the owner to provide instructions related to the construction of the knee wall within the tree canopies on Fort Harrison Avenue. He has not given any specific instructions related to the proposed landscape plantings under the trees. J EN E sp 2 2006 CSRT Flag Building PtavNING DEPARWEta Additional Information from DRC CITY of CLWWAlER Page 2. Planning: ¦ Sight triangles have been added where the driveways intersect Garden Avenue, shown on Sheets C3.0 and 1-1.1 (latest revision 09/01/06). ¦ The existing and proposed mechanical/utility equipment along Garden Avenue will be screened with both a wrought iron fence and landscape plantings. Fence details are included with this letter. Plantings are identified on Sheet 1-1.1 (latest revision 09/01/06). The locations of the mechanical/utility equipment are now shown accurately on all sheets. ¦ The analysis of the integration of the roof-mounted mechanical/utility equipment into the building design was completed by the owner. ¦ The fence along Garden Avenue was discussed above. Other walls will be consistent with the approved materials and colors of the principal structure. The texture, finish, and materials will be cement stucco painted to match the building. The size of the walls will be previously shown and approved, or where newly proposed as along Fort Harrison Avenue, they will have the materials, color and finish consistent with the building, and only as high as the concrete slab there now. ¦ We upgraded the planting schedule to include the quantity of seasonal flowers. ¦ There is no parking proposed along Franklin Street or Garden Avenue. Those parking spaces were purchased by the owner years ago. Both areas are for drop-off and pick-up only from church vans or buses. The delivery and refuse collection areas along Garden Avenue are shown correctly. ¦ The difference in gross floor area came about after the previous development approval by the addition of the basement. The approval of the basement came from an issue the city had with the high pedestrian volume in the crosswalks during lunch and dinner on weekdays. ¦ The lesser number of parking spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA can be justified in two ways: the proposed population of the building did not change, and the church's van and bus system will provide transport for more than 80% of the occupants throughout the day and night. We revised each sheet to include a note identifying the parking garage for reference purposes only, not part of the Flexible Standard Development application. Included with this transmittal are 4 sets of revised plans and attachments. Please review the additional information for compliance with the conditions of the approval. Thank you. SUPPORT.Sp Mg C. ;Kenneth i ly, H. Roush, P.E. FL License No. 33366 KHR:az • • RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2006 'TANNING DEPARTMEW Cf[Y OF CLEARWATER tions Mr. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 September 29, 2006 Re: FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Flag Building Dear Mr. Tefft, Please accept this letter as owner responses to the following conditions for issuance of the above Development Order: Fire Department Condition Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designated in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of seven feet-six inches (7'-6") in front of and to the sides of appliances as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply; And Clearances of seven feet-six inches (7'-6") in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a four foot (4') clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. Response We acknowledge intent to comply with the required clearances for both the FDC and the fire hydrant. We do however, request some consideration for the existing fire hydrant on the Garden Ave. side that has a few inches less clearance existing on the south side of the hydrant. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY 0 REtENEQ Land Resources SEP 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPAR MENT Condition CITY OF CLEMWATER Have Lauren Westenberger, since he relocated the oak tree; review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. Response This condition was agreed at DRC to be a condition for issuance of the building permit. We do intend to have Lauren review and/or write detailed specifications for any work in the vicinity of the existing oak trees. Comment Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment shall be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. It would seem that a fence/ wall is proposed to screen the mechanical/utility equipment proposed along Garden Avenue; however no detail of the wall/fence has been provided with the submittal. Further, the locations of the mechanical/utility equipment differ between the site and landscape plans. Response A detail of this fence is attached to this letter. In addition, landscape for screening has been added at the sides of this equipment. Photos are attached for reference of similar screening done at the Energy Plant building electrical transformer on Court Street. Lugustrums are planned instead of the fichus trees at the Energy Plant as they are easier to maintain at the proper height. Comment Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment shall be integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Clarify what mechanical equipment, if any, is to be located on the roof and the means by which it is integrated into the building design. Response All of the equipment that will be installed on the roof is there now, including the cooling radiator for the emergency generator which is 0 • behind the center parapet of the east wall, and two ventilation fans, one behind each of the eastern elevator towers. The attached photos of all four sides of the buildings show that none of this equipment is visible. Comment Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwat Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regards to materials, size, texture, shape and color. Provide a detail of the proposed wall/fence and ensure that it is consistent with the above Guidelines as well as all other applicable Guildelines pertaining to walls/fences. Response A enlarged view of the planter wall rendering and the construction section for it are included with this letter. The planter wall color will match the precast concrete existing on the building. Comment The previous development approval was for a 323,600 square foot building and the proposal is for a 345,859 square foot building. Please clarify how and where the additional 22,259 square feet of building floor area was added to the building. And With the change in square footage for the building, a further parking deviation will be necessary than that which was previously approved for the development. The 323,600 square foot building required a deviation to 2.5 parking spaces per 1, 000 square feet of gross floor area, whereas the proposed 345,859 square foot building requires a deviation to 2.339 parking spaces per 1, 000 square feet of gross floor area. Provide justification for this further deviation. Response We believe the 22,259 sf difference is the expansion of the original basement in order to move the staff dining room there, at the request of the then City Manager Mike Roberto, in order to reduce the pedestrian traffic generated by our staff at meal times. Since this difference is entirely staff dining facility, it does not generate any new parking need for two distinctly difference reasons: the staff using the dining rooms are the same ones working in the building and are already accounted for in the parking study and traffic study calculations, and 2) At the time of the earlier parking and traffic studies, a major program of staff transportation by bussing was planned, and has now been operating successfully since that time, resulting in the fact that in . -,. W ° `' ' C IJ 3 ° U U g LL ZO 0 0 only approximately 5% of staff drive downtown to work. By written policy of the Church, staff are required to use the mass transportation unless they have a specific reason to driv eir own car to work. Sinc games Bond, Owner's Representative 0 '. V., N a W C\I C? v ? C6 4 t- 0 0, CITY OF C LEARWATE R PI-ANNING DEPARTMENT Posy OrPlcr Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUI'fi MYR'17.I? AvENIAi, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEI:LITHONI: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING Di.,vlil.oPMI?N"1' Rimi;W September 1, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Dear Mr. Bond: At its meeting of August 31, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED your Flexible Standard Development application for a 345,859 square foot Place of Worship within the Downtown (D) District as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code, subject to conditions. Among those conditions were the following items, which must be addressed prior to the issuance of a Development Order for the application: General En ing egd ? Add a note or depict on the plan the provision of a minimum two-foot (2') horizontal clearance from the edge of all sidewalks to any vertical obstructions; and ? Show on the plan a minimum sidewalk width of four feet (4') on Pierce Street, Franklin Street, East Avenue and Garden Avenue; a minimum sidewalk width of five feet (5') shall be shown on Court Street and S. Fort Harrison Avenue. Fire Department: ? Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of seven feet-six inches (7'-6") in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply; and ? Clearances of seven feet-six inches (7'-6") in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a four-foot (4') clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. Land Resources: ? Show the existing trees, with actual canopies, on the plans; and ? Have Lauren Westenburger, since he relocated the oak tree; review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. FNANK I IIIMARU. Nh) (W JunN D(?rAN, C(,(N(.ii.NUansr:r I In)-r I I:vyIll:f(1N, Cc?rNai_w:>nser IiIi.. IONx)N, CnI„MA i.NIFM Iii:r ® C\ai b:N A. IT II i Si.N, C()I Nc li'mrNimolt "I"(WAL I?,UPLU MFIN I AND Ai;isw I:\?i wi: Acre IN F,\mis,) eR" August 31, 2006 0 • FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Page 2 of 3 ? Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, 20-foot sight visibility triangles are required where driveways intersect a right-of-way as well as where two or more rights-of-way intersect. The site and landscape plans depict the sight visibility triangles at the rights-of-way intersections, but not where the driveways intersect Garden Avenue; ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment shall be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. It would seem that a wall/fence is proposed to screen the mechanical/utility equipment proposed along Garden Avenue; however no detail of the wall/fence has been provided with the submittal. Further, the locations of the mechanical/utility equipment differ between the site and landscape plans; ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment shall be integrated into the design of the buildings through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Clarify what mechanical equipment, if any, is to be located on the roof and the means by which it is integrated into the building design; ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, size, texture, shape and color. Provide a detail of the proposed wall/fence and ensure that it is consistent with the above Guideline as well as all other applicable Guidelines pertaining to walls/fences; ? The landscape plan does not identify all depicted landscape materials and does not provide quantities for all proposed materials; ? The site and landscape plans appear to depict on-street parallel parking spaces along S. Garden Avenue and Franklin Street. Clearly identify these areas. Also, if the area along S. Garden Avenue is, in fact, parallel parking, then provide a terminal landscape island to separate the parking spaces from the adjacent refuse enclosure driveway; ? The previous development approval was for a 323,600 square foot building and the proposal is for a 345,859 square foot building. Please clarify how and where the additional 22,259 square feet of building floor area was been added to the building; ? With the change in square footage for the building, a further parking deviation will be necessary than that which was previously approved for the development. The 323,600 square foot building required a deviation to 2.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, whereas the proposed 345,859 square foot building requires a deviation to 2.339 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Provide justification for this further deviation; and ? Revise all references on the plans, application, etc. to identify the parking garage as being included for reference purposes only and that it is not a part of the Flexible Standard Development application. Next Step: Submittal of Revised Plans Four (4) complete set of plans (collated, folded and stapled) must be revised to address the above conditions of approval and submitted to the Planning Department for review prior to Friday, September 29, 2006. Once the revised plans have been reviewed for compliance with the above conditions, the Development Order for this project can be issued. August 31, 2006 • • FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Page 3 of 3 Please be advised that the Flexible Standard Development approval is valid for one year; thus expiring on August 31, 2007. Prior to this expiration date, the first building permit must be applied for in order for this proposal to be considered established, and no permits may be applied for until the Development Order has been issued. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft@mvcleai-water.com S: (Planning Departmen6C D BTlex Standard (FLS)IPending CaseA2 -Reviewed and PendingTt Harrison Ave S 0215 -COS Flag Bldg (D) -Pending DevOrd (RT)Tt Harrison Ave S 0215 - Conditions of Approval 08-31-06doc CITY OF CLE ARWATE R LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: September 1, 2006 James Bond, (727) 445-4359 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 4 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te(ftna inyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** Trallami ssion Report Date/Time Local ID Local Name Company Logo This document was confirmed. (reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter-S CITY OFCLEARWATER PLANNINGDEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 S0tMiMm7LR AvENUE O.EARWATE% FLORIDA33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Ante: September 1, 2006 To: lamm Bond, (727) 445-4359 From: Robert G. Tet$, Plw=M PM FLS=6.04023 (215 S. Fort Harriwn Avemte) Number o0agm Including Cover Sheet 4 Commsalr: ?? Pleva con5rm ?acopt vie o-nullce " vwx P mane et,wrw «.,, ..rnm « • Total Pages Scanned 4 Total Pages Confirmed 4 9- 1-06; 8:48AM 7275624796 No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 229 94454359 9- 1-06; 8:45AM 2'13" 4/ 4 EC CP 9600 Notes . EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multl-Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI: Power Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer HF: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc. WS: Waiting Send Clearwater ?s . DRAFT ACTION AGENDA r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:30 a.m. STAFF REVIEW 9.00 am Case Number: FLS2006-04023 -- 215 S FT HARRISON AVE Owner(s): Church Of Scientology Religiou 319 S Garden Ave Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Printed: 8/30/2006 Times are subject to change Representative: James Bond 319 S Garden Ave Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-467-5000, FAX: 727-445-7277, E-MAIL: flblldesigners@scientology.net Location: 2.13 acres at the southeast corner of S. Fort Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street (FLAG), and 2.03 acres at the southwest corner of East Avenue and Franklin Street (Parking Garage). Atlas Page: 286B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for a 345,859 square foot Place of Worship within the Downtown (D) District as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Places of worship Neighborhood No Neighborhood Assocation Data Association(s): Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page I • • Prior to issuance of a development order 1. Add a note or depict on the plan the provision of a minimum 2-foot horizontal clearance from the edge of all sidewalks to any vertical obstructions. 2. Show on the plan a minimum sidewalk width of 4-feet on Pierce St., Franklin St., East Avenue and Garden Avenue; a minimum sidewalk width of 5-feet shall be shown on Court Street and S. Fort Harrison Avenue. Prior to issuance of a building permit 3. Provide a detail of proposed treegrates to confirm these will not become a hazard for the disabled. 4. Show location of a grease trap on the plan (restaurant use in Flag building). 5. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 6. New valley gutter curb on east side of Flag Building shall be constructed as a concrete swale per Index #107. 7. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 8. Show on the plan all damaged urbing that is to be replaced adjacent to these sites. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 9. Applicatant shall deed to the City of Clearwater easements to protect City access to all unrestricted water lines, including pipes, fire hydrants and backflow preventors.- 10. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 11. Replace or rehabilitate all damaged or missing curbing adjacent to projects. 12. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 2 0 • 1 . Radio Signal Booster System (800 MHz) required per City of Clearwater Ordinance NO.7617-06 The specifications and design of the system will be subject to approval by the City of Clearwater Radio Communications Shop or its designee and the Development and Neighborhood Services Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2 . Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO D.O. 3 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Show the existing trees, with actual canopies, on the plans prior to D.O. 2 . Have Lauren Westenburger, since he relocated the oak tree, review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. Provide responces prior to D.O. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . Show sight triangles in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-904 at the solid waste and loading area driveways to Garden Avenue. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 3 0 0 1 . Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, 20-foot sight visibility triangles are required where driveways intersect a right-of-way as well as where two or more rights-of-way intersect. The site and landscape plans depict the sight visibility triangles at the rights-of-way intersections, but not where the driveways intersect Garden Avenue. 2. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment shall be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. It would seem that a wall/fence is proposed to screen the mechanical/utility equipment proposed along Garden Avenue; however no detail of the wall/fence has been provided with the submittal. Further, the locations of the mechanical/utility equipment differ between the site and landscape plans. 3'.) Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment shall be integrated into the design of the buildings through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Clarify what mechanical equipment, if any, is to be located on the roof and the means by which it is integrated into the building design. 4. j Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, size, texture, shape and color. Provide a detail of the proposed wall/fence and ensure that it is consistent with the above Guideline as well as all other applicable Guidelines pertaining to walls/fences. The development proposal includes streetscape improvements to all four adjacent rights-of-way; ,afL however the streetscaping proposed is not consistent with the City's approved Master Streetscape t and Wayfinding Plan. The streetscape along the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of--way shall be ?tv consistent with the Downtown Corridor streetscape designation for Fort Harrison Avenue, while the streetscaping for S. Garden Avenue and Pierce and Franklin Streets shall be consistent with the Commercial B designation. `6? The landscape plan does not identify all depicted landscape materials and does not provide quantities for all proposed materials. 7. The site and landscape plans appear to depict on-street parallel parking spaces along S. Garden Avenue and Franklin Street. Clearly identify these areas. Also, if the area along S. Garden Avenue is, in fact, parallel parking, then provide a terminal landscape island to seperate the parking spaces from the adjacent refuse enclosure driveway. 8. The previous development approval was for a 323,600 square foot building and the proposal is for a 345,859 square foot building. Please clarify how and where the additional 22,259 square feet of building floor area was been added to the building. 9. With the change in square footage for the building, a further parking deviation will be necessary than that which was previously approved for the development. The 323,600 square foot building required a deviation to 2.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, whereas the proposed 345,859 square foot building requires a deviation to 2.339 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Provide justification for this further deviation. 10. Revise all references on the plans, application, etc. to identify the parking garage as being included for reference purposes only and that it is not a part of the Flexible Standard Development application. Other: No Comments Notes: In order for a Development Order to be issued for this development proposal, four (4) sets of revised plans and application materials must be submitted prior to September 29, 2006. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 4 0 0 Lon; RAn;I? PIAnnING Di-.M:i.oiwi.-N•1' Rjmi w August 31, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos•r Ori=R:r; Box 4748, CLEARWATI.R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUnICIPAL SEYVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIJ? AVli\'tA:, CLEARWA IIT, FLORIDA 33756 TEILRPIIOM? (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Re: FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Dear Mr. Bond: At its meeting of August 31, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED your Flexible Standard Development application for a 345,859 square foot Place of Worship within the Downtown (D) District as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code, subject to conditions. Among those conditions were the following items, which must be addressed prior to the issuance of a Development Order for the application: General En ineering_ ? Add a note or depict on the plan the provision of a minimum two-foot (2') horizontal clearance from the edge of all sidewalks to any vertical obstructions; and ? Show on the plan a minimum sidewalk width of four feet (4') on Pierce Street, Franklin Street, East Avenue and Garden Avenue; a minimum sidewalk width of five feet (5') shall be shown on Court Street and S. Fort Harrison Avenue. Fire Department: ? Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of seven feet-six inches (7'-6") in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply; and ? Clearances of seven feet-six inches (7'-6") in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a four-foot (4') clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. Land Resources: ? Show the existing trees, with actual canopies, on the plans; and ? Have Lauren Westenburger, since he relocated the oak tree; review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. 1uIIN CuI X(.II.MI. B1::u I[())'[ I COI XCii.MI:NII9:a 1():Vu(N, Cnr\(IIAW IWIi Cnrir ;\. I'rrr.r>rn, CAM NCII.W:>usin; A.m) AITIRNIAI IVI: AC k )N F,MITO IT" August 31, 2006 FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Page 2 of 3 Planning Department: ? Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, 20-foot sight visibility triangles are required where driveways intersect a right-of-way as well as where two or more rights-of-way intersect. The site and landscape plans depict the sight visibility triangles at the rights-of-way intersections, but not where the driveways intersect Garden Avenue; ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment shall be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. It would seem that a wall/fence is proposed to screen the mechanical/utility equipment proposed along Garden Avenue; however no detail of the wall/fence has been provided with the submittal. Further, the locations of the mechanical/utility equipment differ between the site and landscape plans; ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment shall be integrated into the design of the buildings through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Clarify what mechanical equipment, if any, is to be located on the roof and the means by which it is integrated into the building design; ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, size, texture, shape and color. Provide a detail of the proposed wall/fence and ensure that it is consistent with the above Guideline as well as all other applicable Guidelines pertaining to walls/fences; ? The development proposal includes streetscape improvements to all four adjacent rights-of-way; however the streetscaping proposed is not consistent with the City's approved Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. The streetscape along the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way shall be consistent with the Downtown Corridor streetscape designation for Fort Harrison Avenue, while the streetscaping for S. Garden Avenue and Pierce and Franklin Streets shall be consistent with the Commercial B designation; ? The landscape plan does not identify all depicted landscape materials and does not provide quantities for all proposed materials; ? The site and landscape plans appear to depict on-street parallel parking spaces along S. Garden Avenue and Franklin Street. Clearly identify these areas. Also, if the area along S. Garden Avenue is, in fact, parallel parking, then provide a terminal landscape island to separate the parking spaces from the adjacent refuse enclosure driveway; ? The previous development approval was for a 323,600 square foot building and the proposal is for a 345,859 square foot building. Please clarify how and where the additional 22,259 square feet of building floor area was been added to the building; ? With the change in square footage for the building, a further parking deviation will be necessary than that which was previously approved for the development. The 323,600 square foot building required a deviation to 2.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, whereas the proposed 345,859 square foot building requires a deviation to 2.339 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Provide justification for this further deviation; and ? Revise all references on the plans, application, etc. to identify the parking garage as being included for reference purposes only and that it is not a part of the Flexible Standard Development application. Next Step: Submittal of Revised Plans Four (4) complete set of plans (collated, folded and stapled) must be revised to address the above conditions of approval and submitted to the Planning Department for review prior to Friday, September 29, 2006. Once the revised plans have been reviewed for compliance with the above conditions, the Development Order for this project can be issued. August 31, 2006 0 FLS2006-04023 (215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue) Page 3 of 3 Please be advised that the Flexible Standard Development approval is valid for one year; thus expiring on August 31, 2007. Prior to this expiration date, the first building permit must be applied for in order for this proposal to be considered established, and no permits may be applied for until the Development Order has been issued. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.teft@tiiyclearwater.cotn S.•IPlanning DeparbnentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)IPending Casesl3 - Up for the Nest DRCIFt Harrison Ave S0215 -COS Flag Bldg (D) - 08-31- 06(RT)IFt Harrison Ave S 0215 - Conditions of Approval 08-31-06.doc _ Clearwater DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:30 a.m. STAFF REVIEW 9.00 am Case Number: FLS2006-04023 -- 215 S FT HARRISON AVE Owner(s): Church Of Scientology Religiou 319 S Garden Ave Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: James Bond Printed: 8/28/2006 Times are subject to change 319 S Garden Ave Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-467-5000, FAX: 727-445-7277, E-MAIL: flblldesigners@scientology.net Location: 2.13 acres at the southeast corner of S. Fort Harrison Avenue and Pierce Street (FLAG), and 2.03 acres at the southwest corner of East Avenue and Franklin Street (Parking Garage). Atlas Page: 286B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for a 345,859 square foot Place of Worship within the Downtown (D) District as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Places of worship Neighborhood No Neighborhood Assocation Data Association(s): Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 1 • I . Prior to issuance of a development order: 1. Add a note or depict on the plan the provision of a minimum 2-foot horizontal clearance from the edge of all sidewalks to any vertical obstructions. 2. Show on the plan a minimum sidewalk width of 4-feet on Pierce St., Franklin St., East Avenue and Garden Avenue; a minimum sidewalk width of 5-feet shall be shown on Court Street and S. Fort Harrison Avenue. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 3. Provide a detail of proposed treegrates to confirm these will not become a hazard for the disabled. 4. Show location of a grease trap on the plan (restaurant use in Flag building). 5. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 6. New valley gutter curb on east side of Flag Building shall be constructed as a concrete swale per Index #107. 7. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 8. Show on the plan all damaged urbing that is to be replaced adjacent to these sites. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 9. Applicatant shall deed to the City of Clearwater easements to protect City access to all unrestricted water lines, including pipes, fire hydrants and backflow preventors. 10. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 11. Replace or rehabilitate all damaged or missing curbing adjacent to projects. 12. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 2 • • Radio Signal Booster System (800 MHz) required per City of Clearwater Ordinance NO.7617-06 The specifications and design of the system will be subject to approval by the City of Clearwater Radio Communications Shop or its designee and the Development and Neighborhood Services Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO D.O. 3. Clearances of 7 1 /2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Show the existing trees, with actual canopies, on the plans prior to D.O. 2. Have Lauren Westenburger, since he relocated the oak tree, review the plans to insure that there is not too much root damage with the proposed wall and landscape plantings under the trees. Provide responces prior to D.O. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: I , No Issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . Show sight triangles in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-904 at the solid waste and loading area driveways to Garden Avenue. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 3 • i 1 . Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, 20-foot sight visibility triangles are required where driveways intersect a right-of-way as well as where two or more rights-of-way intersect. The site and landscape plans depict the sight visibility triangles at the rights-of-way intersections, but not where the driveways intersect Garden Avenue. 2. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment shall be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. It would seem that a wall/fence is proposed to screen the mechanical/utility equipment proposed along Garden Avenue; however no detail of the wall/fence has been provided with the submittal. Further, the locations of the mechanical/utility equipment differ between the site and landscape plans. 3 . Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, when located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment shall be integrated into the design of the buildings through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Clarify what mechanical equipment, if any, is to be located on the roof and the means by which it is integrated into the building design. 4. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, size, texture, shape and color. Provide a detail of the proposed wall/fence and ensure that it is consistent with the above Guideline as well as all other applicable Guidelines pertaining to walls/fences. 5 . The development proposal includes streetscape improvements to all four adjacent rights-of-way; however the streetscaping proposed is not consistent with the City's approved Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. The streetscape along the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way shall be consistent with the Downtown Corridor streetscape designation for Fort Harrison Avenue, while the streetscaping for S. Garden Avenue and Pierce and Franklin Streets shall be consistent with the Commercial B designation. 6. The landscape plan does not identify all depicted landscape materials and does not provide quantities for all proposed materials. 7. The site and landscape plans appear to depict on-street parallel parking spaces along S. Garden Avenue and Franklin Street. Clearly identify these areas. Also, if the area along S. Garden Avenue is, in fact, parallel parking, then provide a terminal landscape island to seperate the parking spaces from the adjacent refuse enclosure driveway. 8. The previous development approval was for a 323,600 square foot building and the proposal is for a 345,859 square foot building. Please clarify how and where the additional 22,259 square feet of building floor area was been added to the building. 9. With the change in square footage for the building, a further parking deviation will be necessary than that which was previously approved for the development. The 323,600 square foot building required a deviation to 2.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, whereas the proposed 345,859 square foot building requires a deviation to 2.339 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Provide justification for this further deviation. 10. Revise all references on the plans, application, etc. to identify the parking garage as being included for reference purposes only and that it is not a part of the Flexible Standard Development application. Other: No Comments Notes: In order for a Development Order to be issued for this development proposal, four (4) sets of revised plans and application materials must be submitted prior to September 29, 2006. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 4 • 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pose Orrice Box 4748, CLi?:ARWATIiR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, I00 Soui-ii MYRl7.E AVIiNCR, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA_33756 TI:LI:11110NE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT Ri-,vii W August 1, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006-04023 - 215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue and 624 Court Street- Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Bond: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2006-04023. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 31, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert. tefftgmyclearwater. corn FkANK I111M IM, AIA)Ok DONAN, C(A NCii.,VEMBI R I IM I I IANIH.WN, 0)( MILMEyIM N 1111 JI,NY )N, ("(Wiu ai \11FAM1:r ® C,wi'l:y A. III: rri6i;lC, On NCU_?nt?nsrr, "I?( WAI 1:.\II1I,M..\n?.N I AND ilrriR:\1,vI Ivi: Acre )N FmITM I],"' • August 1, 2006 .. CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE Clearwater CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: • James Bond, (727) 445-7277 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2006-04023 1215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue and 624 Court Street Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftnmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nzyclearwater.coni ** Aug. 01 2006 09:10AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94457277 Aug.01 09:09AM 00'45 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). E & L SUPPORT SERVICES. INC. 521 Chestnut Street Clearwater FL 33756 Phone (727) 466-6772 Fax (727) 466-6882 email kencrete(a)aol.com FL Certificate of Authorization 7983 July 28, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Attention: Mr. Robert Tefft Reference: Church of Scientology Religious Trust Flag Building and Parking Garage 215 S. Ft. Harrison Ave & 645 Franklin Street FLS 2006-04023 Subject: DRC Submittal Information Gentlemen: Enclosed with this letter are the following: 15 Each Flexible Standard Development Application (1 Original + 14 Copies), 15 Each Attachment A, 15 Each Ninth Amendment to Building Permit Issuance Agreement, 15Each Ownership Documents Flag Building and Parking Garage, 15Each Development Order for Parking Garage (FLS02-03-23) 15 Each SWFWMD Permit (No. 44022985.001) 15 Each Tree Removal Permit for Parking Garage, 15 Each Fire Flow Calculations Worksheets for Flag Building & Parking Garage. 15 Each Reduced Size Site/Civil Plan (1 Color+ 14 Copies 8-1/2" x 11°), 15 Each Reduced Size Landscape Plan (1 Color+ 14 Copies 8-1/2" x 11"), 15 Each Reduced Flag Building and Parking Garage Elevations (15Color 24"x36"), 15 Each Flag Building and Parking Garage Signage Details, 15 Each Previous Approved Certified Site Plan for Flag Building, 15 Each Property Surveys Flag Building and Parking Garage (15 Copies Each), 15 Sets Site/Civil Plans (Sheets C1.1 & C4.1 Latest Revision 07/28/06 and, C3.1 Issued 07/28/06), 15 Each Flag Building Exterior Paving and Fumishings (Color 24" x 36°), 15 Each Flag Building and Parking Garage Elevations (15 Color 8-1/2" x 11"), 15 Each Landscape Plans (Sheets 1-1.1 & 1-1.2 Latest Revision 07/28106), Please schedule us for the August 8, 2006 DRC. Thank you. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 28 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT KHR:az CITY OF CLEARWATER Sincerely, Q&-SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. th?H. Roush, P.E. FL License No. 33366 ' 0 a CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DI:VEI.OPMENT REVIEW April 28, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: FLS2006-04023 - 215 South Fort Harrison Avenue (FLAG Building) - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Bond: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2006-04023. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section G of the application, the site plan shall include the following: (4, All dimensions; 10 All required sight triangles; and Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011. 2. Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan shall include the following: ,Z; Names of abutting streets; ? Sight visibility triangles; e Quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials noted within the plant schedule; jam' Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; and V Irrigation notes. 3. Pursuant to Section I of the application, the building elevations shall include the following: ?f Dimensions; Colors; and pd Materials. While an overall height dimension has been provided, there are various sections of the building with differing heights. Provide dimensions to these areas. Further, the overall height does not appear to be measured correctly. Provide a dimension from existing grade to the mean elevations of the pitched roofs. The elevations do not include notations as to the proposed colors and materials that areproposed for the building. Also, no color samples have been provided. The proposed elevations must be drawn to scale. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR 131LI. JONSON, VICE: MAYOR .1011N DORM, COUNCILME;MBIT Horr HA.NIICTON, COUNCILMLMBER ® CARLEN A. Pr.rl•:RSVN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL 1,MPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVI? ACTION EMPLOYER" 4. Pursuant to Section L of the application, submit a completed Fire Flow and Hydrant Worksheet from the Fire Dept. 5. Section N of the application was not included in the application. Please provide. 6. Pursuant to Section D of the application, responses to the Flexibility Criteria for the Downtown (D) District are required to be provided. The applications submitted (FLD2006-04019, FLS2006-04024 and FLS2006-04023) will need to be resubmitted under one application. This is necessary due to the existing Unity of Title that exists between the Oak Cove property, the Fort Harrison Hotel, and the FLAG Building as well as the necessity of having a Unity of Title between the FLAG Building and the parking garage site. Many of the same plans (although revised to meet completeness conditions) will be able to be reused in this resubmittal; however an overall site plan showing.all of the parcels involved will need to be provided (this would include the Fort Harrison Hotel even though no changes are proposed). Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Friday, May 5, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ?p Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert. to ffigmyclearwater. com 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy Oulu, Box 4748, CLEARwxii iR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL" SERVICI?S BUILDING, 100 SounI MYRTI,Ii AVL?NUF., CLEAimxi'I?It, Rmil)A 33756 'rI;1,rPIIONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DEwi.oPM1iNl' RimiI w August 9, 2006 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 215 S. FORT HARRISON AVENUE (FLS2006-04023) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 215 S. Fort Harrison Avenue, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development to permit a 345,859 square foot Place of Worship within the Downtown (D) District as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be August 31, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539 or at robert.tefftgm_yclearwater.com for further information. You may also visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours; however no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on August 31, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 FRANK I InsnAri . iNIm(w, 1OIIN I IO1'r 11 N111 ION, COI M I MEN11 i r B11A JuNU),N, Cnrnrn_V EN11WR ® Cmm:N A. I'i?ri:r?eN, OH'N(.n_?u(?ntG?; "F(WAL 1:MPi.)YM1:\1 AND Ari:m,%Lnnvi[ A(1rU)N FPIPLO)FR" WILDtR CORP OF DELAWARE 3900 GULF TO BAY BLVD STE 600 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4316 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 TIMES PUBLISHING CO INC PO BOX 1121 ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 1121 TIMES PUBLISHING CO INC PO BOX 1121 ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 1121 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CEPCOT CORP PO BOX 6025 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025 CONNELLY, JOHN PO BOX 2456 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2456 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CfARWATER, CITY OF P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CEPCOT CORP 14480 62ND ST N CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 2721 OSBURG, SYBIL M OSBURG, STEPHEN C 700 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5508 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY BOARD OF 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CEPCOT CORP PO BOX 6025 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025 INTERVEST BANK 625 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5528 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY BOARD OF 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 ARWATER, CITY OF C P PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 COURT STREET ENTERPRISES INC HIRSCHFELD, JOSEPH J THE 13 CAMBRIA ST CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY BOARD OF 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 FRANCHISE EQUITY GROUP INC 630 CHESTNUT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5337 BASKIN, H H SR RENTAL PROP INC 703 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5507 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU RELIGIOU RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 zi N CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY EOARD OF 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 ROPERTI, ROBERT J 411 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5511 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CEPCOT CORP P O BOX 6025 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025 PINELLAS HOUSING AUTH 11479 ULMERTON RD LARGO FL 33778 - 1602 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 ClURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY BOARD OF 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 ROPERTI, ROBERT J 609 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5505 JIFFY PROPERTIES INC 411 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5511 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CEPCOT CORP PO BOX 6025 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 500 WATER ST JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY BOARD OF 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 JIFFY PROPERTIES INC 411 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5511 BALLA, BESIM BALLA, FESIJE 2928 CHANCERY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1403 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 INTERVEST BANK 625 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 -.5528 PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT 14840 49TH ST N CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 2835 PEACE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CH 110 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5107 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition FLS2006-04023 Pres. Sondra Kerr - 215 S Ft Harrison Avenue PO Box 8204 Robert Tefft Clearwater, Fl 33758 16 / 29 / 15 / 94896 / 000 / 0010 Page 1 of 1 27-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:24:57 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST OBK: 07652 OPG: 0298 319 S GARDEN AUE CLEARWATER FL 33756-5423 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.0 1 l f 2003 - 2004 sa es rom : 0 Sale Date OR Book/P age Price (qual/Unq) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /1,990 7,370/ 228 1,315,000 (U) I 1920: Book 005 Pgs 023- 3 /1,990 7,212/1, 124 1,650,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 7 /1,989 7,051/ 695 930,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 961,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem; NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap; 961,800 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 961,800 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CUB Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bey Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes; 23,311.34 1) 265 x 245 14.00 64, 925. 00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2) 265 x 105 8.00 27, 825. 00 S 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 23, 311.34 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be ; 23, 311. 34 Short Legal WASHBURN LOTS i THRU ii INCL Description L ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-giPp=16+29+15+94896+000+0010&o=1 4/27/2006 0 0 Page 1 of 1 10 / 29 / 15 /. 94590 / 000 / 0010 27-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:24:57 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 V.ACc-AnT ExTra? F?a turps Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 z) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gifl?p=16+29+15+94896+000+0010&o=1&t=2 4/27/2006 • • ?.? ate 0 0 '? N c Q U ®" uj Cl Z ? DSCN8168 2048x1536x16Mjpeg DSCN8169 2048x1536x16Mjpeg DSCN8171 2048x1536x16Mjpeg DSCN8170 2048x1536x16Mjpeg r? L MM U?$? I,nrdt - 71117171 ?•'?O` l iltll l 11111111(tl ???' i ili iEm 1 _ yB?ll! }iFl° ? Iii YIIIFIByIr?? 11 III III t[l lii DSCN8173 2048x1536x16Mjpeg I l i l l i l l S I I I l/ i/ l 1 f/1' ¦ itllfi 1$If°•il 11lt°Ilf a I?IIj?`?-,,,1y ?M.,„..'S/ r I l t ToT tT17tIIT77T T??? ?,.? 1 °- i 1! 1 1 1 1 1 e B I I 1 1 1 1 ° 1. ® 1 - "fir` --- ' ?"'•q ''?°v? - - w ? `-?';ap DSCN8178 2048x1536x16Mjpeg 71, 1 1 o a x' 'Irttllii ?? .44 i.K fir. 1 t?¦ t l l l i? ?L r DSCN8187 2048x1536x16Mjpeg DSCN8181 2048x1536x16Mjpeg rpopi -71 TI SEP 2 9 2606 ?LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER m A vt 0 I* a31VflAmio dO lUl;S IW121b'd3Q JNINWo' Ooz 6 ? d3S AI303a s • SECTION STUCCO CAP & MOUI 8" CONC. BLOCKS STUCCO FINISHED & F 7 8' S . NEW "NO FIR KING ® DEPARTMENT CONNECTION' SIGN (2) VERY, #4 REBAR IN n UT SOLID-GROUTED CELL 30"x 30"x 8" CONC. ?- WROUGHT E7 FOOTING WJ (3) #4 41/4" s Ile IRON FENCE =31 REBAR EACH WAY -?- f1 . SEE O Z " F I " " DETAILS 2,31A1 211/ 4? 314 314 Q I / , c Er MIN Y COVER T . 7 ? " POST GAP NO ARKING ' Q - O OA01 AREA / GN V LT Lq 9.5' _ HORIZONTAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION a 0 41EWT GRATE NEW NEW 6H INLET w CONC. y? w NEW RAMP MASO C GAT E POST DET AI LS HC ) H-7. n Al N.T.S. 2' TUBE BLACK IRON 314' BLACK WROUGHT- FRAME ATTACHED TO IRON FENCE COLUMNS(".) STUCCO POST & CAP PAINTED TO MATCH PRECAST COLOR ON BUILDING. -17 u2°- 112" =1-0° SITE PLAN 1:20 RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARMER NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DECORATIVE SCREENING DETAIL Al DATE: 29 SEPTEMBER 21106 DRAWN BY: ZK LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIAC OUnDINC Leh 1.13.4 6. ?. T. R. 4 70 eee 11rcOOFtl106 nwwd a We 'M Npt eaw a P w '7? a 41PA D Raw& ee FprSM Canu1 iiml5s PAPMG GARAGE Loh 1 1IN AND d bW& 17: AM %M IM.nwD0An0 (IVyYp Ind 0 MMplbtMof A CCINIf 1gI11C. 0601 C Dp 5. 4?1a7. P' Put Weera d?PNrw pftidL PARCEL ID NUMBER FLAG BUILDING: 16/12 9/1 5/94 8 9 6/0 0 0/0 010 PARKING GARAGE: 15/29/15/54450/012/0020 15/29/15/54450/012/0030 (LOTS 3-7) 15129/15/54450/012/0080 16/29/15/18648/012/0130 (LOT 15) STORMWATER FACILITY: 16/29/15/18648/012/0130 (LOTS 13 & 14) VACATED ALLEYS O.R. Bk 5223 P91487 O.R. Bk 6663 P9 202 O.R. Bk 11746 P9 598 ECTION 16 TOWNSIIIP 29 . RANG 15 CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA LATITUDE N 270 57' 45" , LONGITUDE W 820 47 51" .Pell. ?R Mi I ' Imo`!' 1 ?? ?o o ???a?i?-?a,? i II c ARN t r? d . d , }I 71m en.e? CgIRT ? cpvnr raunwui - `' LEGEND aw. comma ... ........... .,,........... 10 noalw N1LLL0 ow.sAwmea - ------ Om" am --- --- mw WL all= -- '-'-'-'-'-•- O=. wm sm" ------------ - Na wm man ?. .......... - ff 4 YIII7IY LN0 MM4.0w ......4...... Mr. w *AM IOE[ 01. a= WLW Na On wIO ,N tO1pmw NNW a= rpm same w NAPA gom pave m oe= a r4m Im I'v~ ABLY FL6 RIK SDANmff ="Kim own, om rt!a LAM AMM mm WNW VAM i M a Rn415 .kL? LL a wifflim" It ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEVewvER 0 Church of Saentology FLB LANDLORD OFFICE 3195.Oaie.nAw. Cl.anxa 121-N17467 3'p66 l.k W lac rolaupn...... TIn no.caroaopy.na FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION M ASpa Dnolum rApron7 ARWa 1?DL NLaAL NM1LrD?r oNN x A05aatl ro M na55 p= a?at°NAr E`tlIlA1Nt1' WvLLL NLINIOi 14101001 Lw DilO?1i01Cf?lYW 70R ? P' M RSDYI SURVEY INFORMATION awn waomw famom wm so= • am= ???wL Fu L2 an lbw LtAla a i1M167t WNIqO iA im01WAND AIM 7A m 01 YIDNI "M P11Mltlli Ap/ls tmSpgIM1SRIWWOk CkM. StlN 45pM pt- 5i1-®•4® Ydi-Wa RM-ae .w.wrnrAwrsw IUL 2 81005 FN4WFER Df RFCGD W C ? ? e se IIr g _p k W vwNauv-e... 05.10 D.b•.a er NR p.w.a e.. LrR kb. D.N W ' vnvurnuuxr gr ®vERdxn"ca. p <DXpRD<,pNpi &C/,NP/RGE 10.205 -15E PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMEN .." CITY OF CLEARWATER . UILDING AND FLAG BUI PARKING GARAGE vwN.l 775 0. rt HARRISON AVS. 545 FRANKLIN SMIrr. CLEARWATER FL ORIOA 33755 SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 INDU OF SHEETS CIVIL SITE CIA CIVIL SITE DATA DATA C3.1 EX. FLAG BUILDING WI APPROVED PARKING GARAGE & EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN C4.1 EXISTING SITEAN (PG) ES PLAN 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN IPOI L1 ? ? ? . . A"UILT F I M ?Jo I fi? ?I i `uI W I 471 7.A JF J. -_-_ I _?-.- ADh _ r I i LLL ` l LLL L L LLLL L:1 I I L ` L I ??`L?L??LLyL?[L??L` LLLtiLLLL L C%?FUO ILgq LL LLLL J I L`L`,LLLLLL?,L?,L?,??51%6TORY STRUC?T$II?S LLLLLtL, I 3 L LILLLW 011 Fit L? WNr61` `L?LLLL LLB L LLL??LLLLLL IFr[Fr[`i1[? i; r L LLLILrLLLL?LLLLLL.I L ' ;I I _l: LL4 tLLL ft LLLLLLL.. L t L LLL_ L L L LLLLL NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE STORM SEWER PIPES SWEDULE armor ,n4 ,. Dl1P. ..L[,,. naw E[[ w ill - -r a V66..1 r U. NI r trR ff. LL >• s b r b " ? P r am W» ? qw 7 » W5 49-6 t(13 Y 46 , u M m /? 'C7-0 b K EX. STORM SEWER BTRUCTUREB 0 w»01rICfr im» IWN 03 No i"Iff ifs Id ® it PI•Rt »E 7N fIY N ?? it6 ® saw }fir iNrwr ?I? Yes A[?L 4? Jw»?' Ni • ® lYO! i wr w [Y» ? w?P? w Nwm01 r MR iElf wPw [ p earaE4rr[r r6 yep ® 1!6ara NS. A= U 16 ® »rr a[r wa ?r 6arw EX. STORM SEWER BMCTUREB I 4b &owwoool NE W STORa D RAINAG E [RW CNNE6 rrrrr+r • urrru+ all n[IM awFM u arr+r+ ?r r[ir r 9 urrrtr+ d+ t ? »lrrtr+ r r 0 »+arut ra+r µ?Er6 rw • urlrtr+ INA i[rr ?s Q Yrlrlrl tm%u? l aw ® "=Midi ffm 61? raMr ??ip tawrrr[alr ? 111111011111111 tluarraw rr au lElrO taatrrr[w tar >b rarer I LOT ! ? +! Ifs i V 1 r?s' c E%18TIN0 BTOPoA GIRUCiUREO ?m Gi ? ?aQ ifs g av1?m r M6 1[P 6 W. IL eat m 016 »r M lttf Y as P ?? M W1 tr t. ctli-e r _ Church ofSdentology gil §j-` w ?1 oil --L rleTro 671Rµ, ocor aA>rr - E z FLORIDA 66150 DE?V]EA_LOCPyER 0 FLB LANDLORD OFFICE D195.0orCRnAVP. CIR9nr01Ri, R 3V65 1.R "7rPT-dgi Imc 121.%IiID) ibIJPlgn•naP wMdoaYl+Pt [NOP6fP Of HCORD W V ny 1 M u • 1 r E W De/.:.w, 07Y13IEE .NcE Nwnb.., DS-13 O.bn•GM KR RmM KR p...,. brr AZ .?Ei•6 D. PRFUKPLVtt gt ®P[PMIIiND 6T CONRPUCrgH5i1 RC/rY?/¢GF 18.233 -15E PINELLA9 COUNTY i J FLAG BUILDING AND ? AI PARKING GARAGE P,.N.f Aar •+ ,•, ? 210 i. FT NARPoSON AVE. 1 040 FRANKLIN STREET. CLEARWATER .b1rw EX. FN10q•WILDING W APPROVED PAWING GURNEY DATUM NOVD 1029 GARAGE 8 EXI871N0 S CALE: T"-40• ORAINAOE PLAN p ? dawnR Nwnbe C3.1 PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE SYM8M NAME MIAMONKAME IM=*7m QUAKIn ^ is HT 1 aNaAmD `EeMPdoThY - A N01LY 11? 1 CIFMI 7b`CAUPER Is C NOW wbWE aa DATEPNM SCARPATTRN b X GP GVEB PALM 7IDICLEAR 0CA1S9 1 Ogg= DATE PRIM IV ClEm 7SCAIPER 17 PP kft emRnro AMDO PALM STNICKCOVBDDW/ 1 dP cy-dCMab) P ISTHICK T MP iia°'+?AO WfDMLL PALM @-1@SIQl09l N 1 POP mbd.d PYGMY DATE PAM aC.°057EA SElCN1AN a PR I C. °SSINA I'%/' ROOIaALL MN 1 7 TA TREE MAI OF 14 to C. MSTEM, flld fOOtMLL MN 1 /9 TA TREE N it MTIVEAtAVA Iaa.°esTE.M, fOOT1ALL f%l MN ffu 1 AP O0 A1.11111 TRERPERIN '" I 5Rcu 7 N TNWEWIPIE HYM14AWTHOIK I_. 2 A K-106AFBN 9@O. 34 Q IT 4d?? LLYRAf 71O.GX Q !P SEASONAL GAA_ZC !' Co MlkMNb COONITE GAL, 74lla1' 110 Q Pf PTLLOD@IDRON DAL, as'lod' 17 ND NWWW d... NfD NANIIA IC•7l "Sop" SX 71012E DWWP 1?T 7CISWNtl 1@.7f NF1O111 76 0 IX DocfiMa WDRA 3GAL-ITM.RAI 26 I `J R KWANADO 70A WWI R L 118 Q dA IMPAT@11i k e 71aLp DwoH' SER"*WNDT 76'O.C. all WP WOOD IYRTI a6'OC 178 a. . LA IATANA 7GAA.17M.RLL as a0'O,C. 79 NP Calbo ' NAIALNUM .? N - LRL DW--y ;V- I A all"r ?''$*' °°° FRMIXLIN.771EET. ORIGINAL FLORIDA 33755 JUL 28 tEE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL =i f0` z .. . Dean" r?'1 PIERCE STREET Chumh or ScWntolog H GDLLORRD Om f I ?I r} 7 4 I ^_ r s?' E Nli 1 W - 1 ?::.,.i I SS ? wIe l 5? ?~ ' ? 11. }7 1([ [il 11 1)[\'G ? . "' ® e{II ? WITH RASF, E 1 tiLYSTORYSTRlCI1 RE Jf?? f ??wvr w e P C] BUILDING COVERAGE 63,244 S.F. ® FwsNAE?r... Be-,D nRSF FL. EL. ffi 33.96 y prn,e a KR 1 eIN1M lM ' t.:•? ??: .. I IMwn k RR mem f } t S I J C )11 /n pummm SET C] ose wmw w D b:/tA/ea t •: 3? f_.. 16.299 -15E I LAS COUNTY :+n'cwan'T WF? T'?-+EA+?I, M FLAG Nia-05-71 1 BUILDING AND '?- _-__ --- _ -- -- PARKINOOARAOE }?r>sL{ TREE 81 SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS seT'sas? F-?? 1wyldAw.. ??R? 715 e.P?NUtleeoNAre. ?'ti' i t1BIF7i?' cLSARWATiR ILL-S!<i1G• RECEIVED SURVEY DATUM NGVD 19n °w'• °i 9 rrA.. Mt. ? FLAG _ .ter ? ea11L6:5•a7B' BUILDING ??•r?T? w r•rr ? LANDSCAPE PLAN wA.Y NYC ... . 1P 1Ati d? .;.t ?.- t d?>Ide? w+1Y+r 10 1 '1D b rwhP Irvr SCRUB PLAMWGDETAIL '--.- ?--?-: ?? PLANNING DEPARTMENT L1.1 PALM STAKING & PLANTING OfTAIL TRf f_STAKING d PLANTING DETAIL PROPOSED ® q ',RKING STRUCTU a? ?\ ? SPARKING SPACE! 53,230 SO. FT. ELEK 27.75-27 \J ? C- 74' V VZL 1 II I VlDl9 ? ?/ 447.0' 22. ( C?/ ? C9 1 n I I P a till- a lr.w? I!/1W.M Q, ?K t90GwARM9--Q.-MY .OM) ?SRICT _.. ................... ....................... ......... -..-............. _..._..................... ------------------- -------- - - - ----------- /N I VAURMWI6 1. u?w.r9A nwl ¦.r ?.««rflw . r«Pl rllYrrV .[Ar ?.l?r ra l Ari Yi ?[ ri f n1. Y.n«. • rRl M V On?« e9. • nrwlnen «t1n19w t. waa?r?iipo u?°r?w??i?i?ryl°ar°4 •w wa we «rr rwr UY/11/w«.MA r«iY. 11 «ilr.?.Ml`Y A.IA • 111.1112=I?I.?ryrw r9rr ! .Y M A 1114 ! If Ir?K!_M ? Ir?? I!1 It. 1?IhrW?l1« «4j1? I!i/1??Ir ?N.111r?L M I1111?1MOI1YnYIr{?s •I R A1`1 .[ i.i Ir I1r.11?N f Y?1?. ? M .II I ? °?~ M N ? ° 1t OsrlPr Ir QOM IIMI s r :....11.1....,..0.1..1,. Y...! 9? ? e..I..0w1.Y.0n.... rrr11•«nel .... ire.. ¦?wnaruw.el«i eossr re wren rlrer wrwr K nAr leA .,. nee ... ,.. eYw ,. 1n nRnrr Y ?yy? w.r ne «Yns • w nsYE.« . 11[ M?«Y11L 6.IV Y ?>111. rrerl • ?YN? MIA Nr e0? ?+?r I?il°°ti4w! i1°°rr°°+e?w l?r rw• 01 eur un?clal el MwCniu C «Yrl kwej 44rrM.- 01WrRt r ow- r)_A (y rV Q Church of Sae tobgy FLB LANDLORDOFFICE 919 S. Gwa.?.va. tNwvo!9?. A 3:Ob . )elm i?9 >s?-:?.vnn IE W.1y?a,.d+c?n>teyy.nl ?S Pmx. l? AE ®r1 rlmucn conn?vucl wgecl 16 -299 -15E PIN ELLA9 COUNTY FLAO BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE 215 $. R NARRISON AVE. 445 FRANKLIN STIRS . CLEARWATER fLARIDA 9.9755 PARKING GARAGE LANDSCAPE PLAN SURVEY DAT9N NOVI) 112E SCALE: 1•.40' nA..1N b ,e .? 40 L1.2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER North Elevation C' "x _-- C= 1 a co g .D o (D U ?uj zp Z g? a_ 4 4 m e "Im ' "' ' ® R7I'? ?7?1'! ?T P!7?? ! TE . ? F ?i ? W Iii Yi ili i m m m IN • q gyp/ x ® ,M ,N M ?tl. l i?A? M m m sm Fm m m m wi t ? a i- t s. 11111 lull CIO{ -- fT ?J South Elevation co ? sF Z j cv w Q m 00 ,E U C\2 U U.J O .i z ?- "S O ? Z? SU 0 4 l t East Elevation lL 0 c Q w Q Z > GO 0 -j (D Lu CIO C) (D () O LL O Z Q / % t 0 17i? ?1 A itl (?_ ,F IM ? V?(S?Aa'•1 1?? ?R-iwrg+? I. . ,. t vf ?? i' i tll f ? II? i =C `? 7t'A 1 I e ?r 7m, y 11 1 1 11 I 1 111 4 .. - i ..- 1 ex1 1 II 1 Illlllfff 1 ? M a IYi 0,, ,.,, : •? r_ ?.,,! x a 1 I 1 A !V nl 1 1 ?11 ! ??? .7_ IF -r _r -/_ -r -r 7- _.w- .-w- '7- T_ ,T_. -w- -r. T -r -. IR ILR M121 saw "Oun m it «I IA 11 !« «I 10 «I o: 11 .« III, • .: !« "I m In :,,I in IN t. v Arw_ =I lbd 1101 lilt Ml 111E 1=2 -1 ?? r. s ?.: `liiilii113i_... ?' 1 11?{* •i1?N?1. ilt West Elevation t a 4-1 - G' OC < Z a ca a 1 050505 I 1? ? rnf 1051 10505 III iii ?KOMSOMOL., i .- rnm lRemG III?I1tR - - iii I, - i 1 1 its i i oil 0505050505 din' ?i051? T T T T T T? ? T T T T T -nr- -?1r -wr- n1 111 m ?1 n1 In 111 ii' 05111 T iii 11 ni i=i iii iii Iii ui iii iii m II 050505 iii 01, 805 G11 l:1 m rem 111 1 IF. i n1 In?I ?j ?j pmi 1:: IMM UK M1 W W III 111 „ iii ;? it { IO {K ;i 1 {i 0505;1 no North Elevation If tar ®p m m 6m I m . so T T T T T T T T T T FAT - F -T. ?FT-1-'Y a M M m m m I In an u/ /\ w .-mm South Elevation 'If I W I ma N M I 1. WHIM " 011,1110 ? frill" ' 1111M M I ? I W I 1? 1 0 m Bti I;BiiM " AiRiill I;titiM ? MllrHi N 1 71 East Elevation t ?Y ? 1 /il 1 i ill 1 Y11 111 West Elevation N p •I Ili r? -? ?i r 11? ttY I 1 1 1 ??1 f ?eN 1 1 Iq 1 ? ¦? 1 s4, ?. MM ,f • ?J U \J U'u °? U?J *' U ° ?oa? o al oa ao? t ?.Tr 70' 7.7 1.8 l?U U?UU e g2 9 U 'rYi'-0' 4_21 -0 fitu28'-0' ,0'-0' . s At At A2 ?- -? Roar A2 I I I 2 -, I t ri A9 M STORAGE ??I n 79-02E OEM: 0.1MG FIIYP At a UP IV TOILE71 1 I UP UP OA! (?L ° AT - sANTn?RI .Ft RM. n I N 025 ARM I ' SA-AA STAIR OAA 0-? _ $fOR. I 6 3A-IA _- _I 5011 - I _I I _ o 4 - \ ? - ??- - r -_ 029 020 a22 I B }? ro I sTOR, - ?l ;_ I ° 02 o1e AS I i Q u i - --- , _ I Q I . • ` SmTpATION LOBBY i $70R. I PRIVATE 018 b 017 0 ?' USI mac'- DINING 7A - _? STATION 41 _41f_21 I n ?- -i B -6E 0-0 5'-8 , . 0= i.7 91 Y LANG TRENCH MAIN 5'_p• IN-1 1/2' 5 4- 0161 o (3'5Ud RECESS -R - 5! M1' 0, 9?LOM FLR.) - I I '? ?I aI ¦ - - =-?- - - $---I .,'x T 6' a-F-• 5/5' C1P. R0. FOR .PLUMBING, 7A-IB - ?. Not JB S LONG 1REKN ORNN ( - _ _- - - 3USING STATION ' - - OPEN - _ - - - -- - - A IG )RAN SEE - - - - c lA-1B \J CO A' -ON, C'RENpH OANN 9A-27E 07 ' OFFICE -0. 20-3 --,jq-0' REFER?o gJ ?h n KITCHEN 4000 SERVICE V ORAMNGS FOR A - _ J 016 ADDITIONAL INFORMITCN, U-- -- ¦ - - pi o ,/2.- - - - --- a ?. °i - - -- AND ONENS;OwL SERKT NS. AND 4' RENGN - ?I GN -? CE5- - -- - - uA= 1959 ?,?2. Res s 2' LONG ?Reza GRAN e • u 10'-0' 10''8• ZL N. biuf. C i 5. ? I BA-i3C I I •: ---w L :.R. 'GREASE (, '/2' EV.'3 RECESS ? 1'N 71' I . I BUSING - © 3ELOA ry. 418„ •,I - - -t' - - -+--1 - 78-SA n , 056T c - _ _ I T FS © - - - '?- ' - 2 Jc A CLOSET 4 9U9NG I Q I STATION OI S ' L 1'-4- °; c Q " - :? - - _ 012 -? 033 00 STOR. Ca2 Jt -? - ry :; ; r 4 RAGE 1 CORRIDOR ' &A I q pay, CORRIDOR I LOCKER RM. OC9 SANHi6R =0--- - ! -+- - LOCKER UM Q1 7 - - - INC PUMP 6TA r I ?' ?? FOOD SANIG LIFT RY. i MEN 306 5005 I 5 piAGE I S 5007 B JOBA M JA-BA ?. o r 7-A-cMJ _ _ 31 I '' 002 i UP UP 3A-11A COOLER 9-0N U I (7 1/2' SLAB 3ECESS QO Q7 90. M N. 1RI _e \ YECNARICALOOM 7B-01E - MECH. I ;°1 1 Q1 ROOM 'O BA -23C t ( R 0 -, 009 --- ?J n5? 4L I r 1 ELECT. t m m AIL-- 0 AXON 9F Rte- n. G> 2' 0 -2 -1( 03a 5'-01 '-0• 1s-O' lo'o' 26'-0• r'°• n'-O• Is'-O• '-0 u u ' •- y ?_} r A 0 15-0' 151? r-0' 3'•0' 15'-7 6-a 20 29'-0• t0'-0' 0 ''? 1781-0' Ir-0•J: 2'-p'J 7•_0 mil' °•J L!g•_ f2• ?? t7 \J ?J? a4 ?? ?4 ?/' 4A a 6b j e at 66 uA 7 7.1 1 ? M7.811 0 CO??0 0 0 7A-tA LEVEL BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN p fDA -4-, ?A SCALE: t14B=" ?'-0" /-+? °AOEC? NCRTH ZL Religious Trust Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center Clearwater, Florida He91aA11 Obete + Kesssbean, Ins. Ard9teohre, Erpne In% Interiors Tempe, F1oAde Wafter P. Moore and Assodetes, Inc StmtLr t Eryneers Tampa, F1orWa 0M.&V Fnpne By. Protect NArtNr 97-0243-20 Oraw b? CFiLV ROVWwed a,. A"" CA,t Date aw.6d _ Jule 7, 1999 pwomm m Na !D1,cA~ Oats Q Addrgm M3 e228199 ... Qt AgOMtlm 1e 9129/99 /, A31-00e 10/27i99 , YALLE ENGFA E 7110/00 OrrrAi9 TMe LEVEL BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN CAteomy . sw • to dy - 9NUt 4Ae2A-0 FOR CONSTRUCTION Helmu N OO.M • Kaemboun ha 000yrw" a 1999 N Q FlB2153-70 • V S V L B 2153-60 c a m N u FlB2153-50 L 0 V 2B 2153-40 BENJAMIN COLOR PRLVIEW's 2153 u 0 0 N L Q? V is 0 OC-136 a 0 u u s OC-135 N .C 3 0 aD E • 9 OC-134 L 0 V C O FlBOC-133 BENJAMIN MOOR E® OC COLOR PRE+VIEW® lII III -V • ? -0 "-y salt c . pEVELOPER i EXIST. CONTOUR , . ~ ~U I~I~~ ~ II~ .NEW ELEVATION +10.00 .Lots 1 2 3 4 5 7 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11, GEORGE WASNBURN 1 I ~ SUBDVISON, accord,ng to the map or plat, PR OJECT BOUNDARY thereof as recorded in Plat Boak 5 Pa e 23 of 'the Public 9 4 @ ~f 0 ~ Records of Pinellos County, Florida. 0 tt EXIST. STORM SEWER NEW STORM SEWER ~.~i EXIST, SAN. SEWER ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ Church of Scientology ' ~ ~ ~ _ Lats 1 throu all bloc the Unnumbered g I 1 'I~ S s~~1,~~ NEW SAN. SEWER FLB LANDLORD OFFICE Block I in North of B o st of A.C.L ilr ' ° ~ N` ;,.F r- Y 9 Ra oad, South s w ~ IC1 4 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ y a~ of Franklin Stre est of I CQURT SQUARE, ~ ~ - ' , 319 S. Garden Ave. ~ ~ "4 x` r` • ~ EXIST. WATER SERVICE Clearwater, acc r ~ ,~~a~~~ o d' e map ar plat thereof, as 'n Plat I J ~a' , ` ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ r F FL 3375b tel: 727-467-6583 x~ ~ x NEW WATER SERVICE fax: 727-445-7277 Page 52; Public Records of Pinellas Coun ~y, ~ ~ ~ ~ G U e~ ;o II 's f ~i~~~~~~ ~ 44~ ,,w~, =1~ ~ r ~ 4 '~a~ , : ~ flblldesignersCscientology.net ' s:~l~ I , . ~y p~ r u~~l,~ Diu.., t`~CS ~.a ' ; ~ ~ OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES C.O. r-- ~ ~ 1 ~ CLEAN-OUT(C,O.) ~ : ~ : ENGINEER OF RECORp I_ ,_.~.I F9 x ; s G a .n "^;aero .w,a ' v, 13 r IJ ~ " ;~~o~~„ 6 9 ` f= e TEMP. SILT BARRIER: ~ 2 a r~ I' ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ FENCE ~ ~ W N Fs ~ ; III I~ i'i ILA ~ r, ~ Et I~ 7 WV m `3N!°' r ~ i s ~ f 2 EX. WATER VALVE. ~ ~ h ti ~ o , , ~ Y i c~, b ~ ~ ~ ~a NEW VALVE zX N~. ~ I~~ `a' 1.~~ - ~ S ` y.,. a... ;r k . r 4 y 1 !iJ rn,°' ~ k P ~ ~ ~g ~ « ~ ~ ~ ~ POINT OF CONNECTION a~e~~ W'~ ~ ~ " su C, ~ l ~ ~ ~ N 0~ W i „ n a I ~ ~ ~sL~~ f ; OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. ~i ~ zzr ~ v~..N~~~' ~s3 ~ ~ o ~ y~j ~ .1 1 t ~ 1,~~ ~ ~ .dn~~ i' P~~I'~F1~ ~E'~ ~ ~ TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ • ~ ,,.r ~0 3~ G L'. ra'`n rn~< : } dy tt'~,~ (TYP} TYPICAL ~ ~ ~ o ~ _ 2 4~+, , ~ SIW SIDEWALK J~ s ~ W ~ 8 _ 1~ , °M U a ~z~~,~ ~ _ ~ ~ . M METER N ~ 8 1 I 3A £ ais ~Y s~~~aa f ; _ ,,,yY~~3~ a, s,~ B.F,P.D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE LLl ~U C ~ ~u!n sy;; F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY •E~s.~t s, e a t. F ~ , ~ ~ ; ~ , _ , a ~ ~ pate issued: ®7~2~® N of I~ ~I~ I~~~ , F.D.C, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ' ~ ~ ~ ~ Pro~ecl Number: Q ~ . Vii; h y ~:F~ ~ ,,w,~~y ~ I~~ ~ ~ ° , . ~ tax, . UTILITY POLE (UP.) pesigned by: KR ~r t ~ . s; A `y~~' ~ ,~;r ~ ~hfa,,; ~ GUY- ANCHOR ~ Revised by: ~R . , ' N. ~ ~ ~ • Drawn by: Utz CO{1R7N+7USE ti8 a aa~ ~ ~ ~ SIGN -o-- . , ? y Y~ , i5151f1 I~ I t ' ' ~ ~li!~ , l i ~ ~ S~ I~ B Revisions: "j SANITARY MANHOLE ~ _ I~ . No. pate pescription STORM MANHOLE ST ;1 1 09/01/06 CITY COMMENTS RTC' 0 - CENTERLINE ~ 2 T =I 3 4 Q EXISTING E P RCPOSED P REQUIRED EXISTING 5. l :XISTING (E} PROPOSED (P) REQ(JI s ZONING: p D D ZONING: p s o LAND USE: CAD CBD CBD LAND USE: CBD- CBD . CBD - CBD $ MINISTERIAL TRAINING & MINISTERIAL TRAINING & PASTORAL COUNSELING PASTORRAL COUNSELING USAGE: CENTER.- PER SECTION 2-902 VACANT VACANT PARKING STRUCTURE SECTION Z-902 SITE PLAN APPS®~lED CENTER USAGE: COMMISSARY ~ LAUNDRY CASE ~20~ -0'!023 ~ PRELIMINARY SET 92,644 S.F. '32,640 S.F, N/A 88,345 S.F. 88,345 S.F. 88,345 S.F. CASE TYPE .~"i-~ S'~ • ' LOT AREA: 2.13 ACRES 2,13.ACRES LOT AREA: 2.03 ACRES 2.03 ACRES 2.03. ACRES N/A DEC DATE i ~ PERMITTING SET BUILDING COVERAGE: 63,244 S.F, 63,244 S,F. 53,230 S.F CDB DATE ~ ? CONSTRUCTION SET N A BUILDING COVERAGE: (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE 68:3% 68.3% / N/A ) S.F. & / OF GRASS SITE { ) N/A 6D,25 ~~/A SiGNATU DATE o d~ GROSS FLOOR AREA S.F. ( 345,859 .S.F. 345,859 S.F. 370,560 S.F. MAX GROSS FLOOR AREA S.F. { ) N/A N/A /A N/A SEC I TWP RGE F.A.R.: 3,73 3.73 4A MAX F.A.R.: FRONT 1 10.9' NW 10.9' { ) {NW) FRONT 1 ON N 1429x1 - N/A { ) PIERCE ST. 11.1 (NE) 11.1' NE FRANKLING ST, N/A { ) N/A SA' - r`1/A NOTE: PI ELL CU FRONT 2 46.4' NW 46.4' NW ; ( ) { ) SETBACKS. FRONT 2 ON (E F N/A ) T. HARISSON AVE. 51.6'(SW) 51.6' SW EAST AVE SETBACKS: { ) 1 D,D' (Nw) N/A REFERENCES TO THE PARKING FRONT 3 16.3' SW ' ( ) 16.3 (SW) SIDE (W 11.3' (SW) GARAGE ARE INCLUDED FOR App/Permit No. Ex ,pate FRANKLIN ST. ~ N/A ) 10,0 (SE) 10.0 (SE) PRIVATE ROAD N/A N/A ss.a, (NW} ~/A REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND FB Fl.szoos-o4o23 THE ABOVE DESCRIBE P D PRO ERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FRONT ' 5s,5 (sw) ~ ARE NOT PART OF-THE FLEXIBLE - - FLOOD ZONE "X'~ ACCO D 4 13.1 (NE) 13.1 (NE) N R ING TO THE FLOOD IN5URANOE S. GARDEN AVE. ~ ~ /A BACK /A 91.9 (sw) r~/A STANDARD:DEVELOPMENT uTiL1TIES BCP2003-0$679 COMPLETED RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBERS 12103C0108H P 13.4 (SE) 13.0 (sE) /A MA 7.7' (SW) REVISED DATE 05 17 2005. PROVIDED BY THE FED R CROSS TOWER HEIGHT TO TOP: / E AL 150 150 N/A CORNER TOWERS HE(G T' H TO TOP: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. APPLICATION. UTILITIES BCP2004-06322 COMPLETED 57,65' CDRNER TOWERS MEAN ROOF HEIGHT: 107'-4" 10T-4" N A CORN N/A SWFWMD 44022985.001 UNE 11,0 / ER TOWERS MEAN ROOF HEIGHT N/A 4,25' N/A PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: N/A PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: (V.U,A.) N/A NJA V.U.A. N/A ( } N/A N P~~A Project Name: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO:. N A IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RAT (LS.R.) 4.90 / 2 4.9D2 ~ (LS,R.) 0.14 FLAG LLI .0.14 Dss N/A OPEN SPACE: 1 0 9,079 S.F. 9,079 S,F, N A OPEN SPACE;. 75,977 S.F. (S,F. & / OF GROSS SITE) o / SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED FROM SIGNED & SEALED 9.8rb 9.8/ (S.F. & / OF G SITE) 86.0% 75,977 S.F. 12,36$ S,F,. SURVEYS BY: P . 86.0%. 14.0% N/A ARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: PARKING LOT ERIOR LANDSCAPING: STEVEN SEMPLE, P.LS. FLA. REG. Na. 54$9 S.F. & % OF V.U.A. N A N N/A { ) / IA S.F.&/ NA DATES OF SURVEY: APRIL 20,.2006 AND APRIL 26, 2006 ( V,U.A.) / N/A N/A N/A Project Address ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN IN NGVD 1929 DATUM ' PARKING: 4 876* ~ Address: 1101 Channelside Drive, Suite 400N 809 .PARK N/A N/A s4a~ N Y T V 1929 215 S: FT HARRIS~N ASE; Tam a, Florida 33602 PARKING CALCULATIONS: * INCLUDES 17 HCAP SPACES. P P NG CALCULATIONS: PARKING-GAR AGE AND LOTS REQI Phane: $13-223"-9500 Fax: $13-223-0009 NOTE. is 334 SPACES HAVE :.BEEN PROVIDED THROUGH AN-IN LIEU PAYMENT TO THE CITY. A AND LOTS REQUIRE NO OFF-STREET PARKING PER CLEARWA;TER 1 Web-Site: www.wllsonmlller.com MINIMUM OF 475 SPACES WILL BE BUILT 1N THE GARAGE. FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMEN' D DEVELOPMENT (TABLE 2-902}, FLORIDA 33755 INCLUDING 6 BUSES, Isla. 1.1 CIVIL I T CIVIL IT prawmg Title 3p~ IL I ~~Ir, ~®®D~?a®~~ ®~D~a~~~• 1 XI I ~ L CIVIL SITE .1 XITI SITE lJTILII L T l1w.1 SCAPE PLAN Drawing Number. RECEIVED AM AM SEP 2 9 2006 1:11. 113.2 m moo PLANNING DEPARTMENT Eno= CUM ~Y i I it I ~ DEVELOPER I , ` - ~ it II i ~ II II I - - II i I CRY INDEX Na. 109 _ \ NEW HP RAMP - . ~ ~ _ - - ~ W/ TRUNCATED - _ ~ ~ DOMES PER IAIEST _ / , - 1 1 FDOT No. 304 (NP) ---,c._ - i/ 1, 7 b' , - i 3.1' ~ r I i - ~ ~ I i f- F, o Church of Scientology I NEW TREE 0J ,'1 P ,1. ~ 3. ~ ~ GRATE (TYP) {q~ ,,i , I,I i % ' ; ; 'r ~`d W ;IUI I;'~F i ii i / /i., ? I rile i;l, yi ~i I ''!ii 7 i~; ~ FLB LANDLORD QFFICE ~ 319 S. Garden Ave. ' CURB FOR NEW NP RAMP Clearwater, FL 3375b fly' ~ ~ ~ f / i i ~ ii;' ,r, NEW TREE W/ TRUNCATED 109 tel: 727-467-6583 NEW TREE D0ME5 PER LATEST ~ ~ I ~ i r ' / r / / ' / i 7' GRATE (TYP) - i' I /s' r U B TO RE GRATE (TYP) FDOT No. 304 (TYP) faX: 727-445-7277 / MAIN ~ ~ a ,i~, / ~r. flblldesigners@scientology.net - I_L~ ~ ~ ~ NEW q / ~ O ,r;'~a ~ LANDSCAPE FGQ, ~ i / / / ~/r . it }i';/,, i. lip i i i'i: 9 r r 0T" i- AREA I[) At r i,/'r, ~ a, , OEC Rl( I i ~I y y PLANTER ;y°j',-. , ~ +v , OE/C~R~~/14~' ' ~ ~ ~ ' / SIOEW K/ ' /,,,'j'~,'' ~ r /~NEW~PLANTER - . i/. ~ a . ~ z ~ ;r ~ Ir~ ENGINEER OF RECORD. , r - u~ ~ .~r, ~ ~i~ ~r/ ; / r :/i / 350.00 P 3~ 150.00 P 350.50 / ' ~c B: - I /i; NEW , q ~ ~ r r,,~' ,4~, m PLANTER / / r r NEW NEW r/:, C`~ ~ r, ~ r r/'; ' ~,i', PLANTER / ~ NEW PLANT pRM /1 q , a w , sir LANTE ' /i,; / r// / , NEW PLANTER ~ ~ I Z ti a Cp _ ri ~ -,r 41.9' 91.7' r;. ,ir:' %i w n r"~ I I / \ / 1 M ~ o a SIGHT , i.%,, ro n m _ 3 TRIANGLE % ~ iu%", W n ~ h w ,~,,0~ e'}~ tq ' A~ I ~~I _ w ~ x , ~ > 158.3' ~ I i :v.. M 3 r' ~ , ~ , i ? W U h . ? A~- z •J ) < ~{j r N b g F ~'zc~, ~i ~ w I ~ ~ ~ w w m ~~c il!,q ~ ~ ~ ~ I Z ~ i ii / ~ N~ aJ I ~ c.D. ~ 7.8' a ~ ~ M 3 O j ~~~'a~' s j., I ~ ~ 1; 1, ll, ll. ty pi . . : I „ H ~ x LLI r<_ _ EM.3"WEI&BfP ~ ° NEw ~ ~ ~ u. ~ , .~Z,_FO _ _ _ ~ j/ ~ O °NO PARKING N w ~ W o ~ , Z of FlRE U W Q ~ W ~ " EX, OVERHE FIRE PI ~ AD WAL „ I i / I, , ' j i FIRE PUMP j ~ ~ DEPART4IENT ~ ~ = w Y ; i, ROOM ; ~ i DDCYa ~ = CONNECiION° U 3 a a ; , i> ' 46.4 ' ~ o z ' ~ El(,FH SIGN a o ~ 'i LEVEL 1 ~ i u~ t ~ 12.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ r ;;i'? , ~I---- I ~ ',ri' ~ ` ~ , Date issued: 07128/06 ' BLACK [Eil % 0 ; „i wROUCH Pro ect Number: - IRON FENCE ' Q ' ~ j 0610 % : . I . i - ;',r (nP~ ~ KR ~r ~uErEA-~ ~ ~ Designed by: / % / , I / / FT ~ i/, > ~ ~ Revised by: ~ ~ ' ' ' Drawn by: / /`i,, ~ I , I u~ I I I r, /r, . _ , 1 iRANSfOR~~ERS EK, EIECiRICQ'_--~~ ' s°Q ~ Revisions: TRI,NSEOR~ERS Ew ~ ~ °NO PARKING /;ii`°,; ~i j / ~ oaDl c aREA° Na Date Description w ~ n~~ " ~.D>l c ~ % GN I n/~.~ 1 09/01/06 CITY COMMENTS J1 ~ CT EIEIE2 ~(p;~~~ I ~ 2 10/02/06 CITY COMMENTS ~ 8.Q ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ I / /~'r'T it / E. ' I ~ ~ I 0'_~ 1 ! , i ;''r'; ~ 1 ~ L 7 NEW 6'H 1.-_ J ! Q ~ ~ - _ l` coNC, i ~ ~ 4 I / NEW ' ' j ~ i I r ; iii I I U - ~ - - - LANDSCAPE %%MASONRY ~ ~ . < m NEW w ~ ~ INLET - _ COLUMN ~ I i~ ~ U ~ - ~ ~ , I~ , AREA ~ / i:u ~ J I ~Y; ~ - Z e, ' < I ~ ~ m % ';z~ a i i I , 7 i% ~I 'D _ ~p I 8 b"' x m~ =i i / I t~ -SOCIDWAS~E~ ~gOCI0WAS3E~ .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.SIGHT.'.','.' •NSIBILiTY•" ~ II I I I''~-,_.~ --+~RECYGLING- N i i i :;~?'G ":rt, lY~ i ~ [COMPACTOR) r,r s ~ I I (1ST FLOOR (COMPACTOR),' 3.'.'.'.. '.'(T1P.J.'.','.. JV I I I i i /r.Sl it I rFU I I ~ PRELIMINARY SET `(1ST FLOOR( ~ ' . , , j ~ o FU / , i I a r."~ ; , w ~ o- J , _ Nao ~ PERMITTINGSET ~ i„' i L - r ~i v I I ~ r I I I - .'.'.CONC:.'.' z ~ t~~ • • t~EW ~ ~ z f `1 I ~ CONSTRUCTION SET I I ~ ! _ ','DRIVEWAY", ~ ~ .%'i'~~;%,-%:``%';~'i-; I GREASE I i , , ~ ; „ ; i I TRAP ~ /j, ~ I (BASEMENT) ENT) i I.',;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,' ' . , Z ~ ~I I '+f I L I I i I i•,•,•,•,•,•,•,•,•, SEC / TWP / RGE I L it I ~ I L~~~.~••~~~~1 • , ' 16 - 29S -15E (J r - I J 1 ! t~ l ~'/'9 ~ ~ ~ JANITOR ~ L I ; I'.','.'. ,ARC, , ' ' t L'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. , , • , • . O ; ii' , ~/4 ' I CLOSET I, SANITARY . I ai ~ I ~ , \ , ~ i I (BASEMENT) ~ SUMP ' I ' SANITARY I':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':'• i PINELLAS COUNTY In SUMP ~ i(1 I ~ < ; ~ A ~ ~ I I I (BASEMENT}' I I ~ u /'C%,l I - i ~r 'i ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ _ - . 'g i App/Permit No. Exp, Date ~ I I ii .s, NEW / CL ~ I , LANDSCAPE ,O ~''/////r/' .i 70.2' ~ FB FLS2006-04023 i ! AREA r r' ; ~ f, . / %'i ~~j I UTILITIES BCP2003-08679 COMPLETED _i ~ i ' ~ „ a j UTILITIES BCP2004-06322 COMPLETED ~ ~ , r D ~ ¢ I SWFWMD 44022985.001 UNE 11,0 ~ O - o~ G0. ~ a ~ ~ ~ i J / ~ 3 ~ ~I 158.3' z . z ~ I % , r ~ ~ 43.9' W ~ I , , / r ' r' , J / ~ ~ X12' Project Name 51.6 , / / ~ ; , . ~ , . , ~ / r ; ~ ~ D/. / r ~ / W ?%i Z MET EX, r~ ~ o <'; ~ / ( ~ cuR r~ / rn 350 00 P B FOR ~ ~ 41.8' l } 50'00'(P}~~ 8,350,44'(F} i ALIGMENT SIGHT 41.8 r ~ar VISIBILITY r~' EW PLANTE i%'~r ~ & GRADE ~ NEW NEW v,' r r ~ ~ % TRIANGLE .fD; r ~ , / , ~ I FLAG BUILDING c~ d ~ % ii j ! ~ r \ . PLANTER LAV NEW PLP / / / ' /i (TYP) : ~ t~ y EW PLANTE ~ ~ r NEW PLANTER p / AN(~: 88 i i r,'r., i i ,r , ; /,''iii-;; i . r, ; 6; / . ~;r / ~ ~ , < i / f~ r , / : r; 7 ,r. ~ / ' ' ' / / NElN''/~i EW hiP RAMP j r• i r , ,v; rr / i r r , r / ~ ~ . , i Y, :,i' , .',H p.' 'i'v, '-r ,r,~ ,/s .r';; /.7 i 7 ; %i r r , 7;, c / . , Vii;- - , ; P ~ ~i / , % r , ; 9F'. ~ / . t , 0 ~~~i i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~'~~ / ~ ~Rl' INDIX No. 109 ~j/~ / ~ w/ TRUNCATED ~ i Project Address / "I - 0 0 ' •r / r , r ;i,, , / i' s ~ , NEW HP RAMP cir,r :i i'%: ii ar,. it . / / i / / ~y ~ / ~ / i / i QOMES PER LATEST ' 4// l i~ ilir. / ,1 DT No. 304 r~.~;, .7 ,~rr;~/ r ~ ~ : r _ _ 215 S. FT HARRISON AVE. i cm INDEx Nc, 1a r / / ; ' /i / ~ EW STRAIGHT CUR I w/ TRUNCATED ~ / Vii, , ~ NEW ~ NEW N i. ~ / T NEW O / HC;, ~ . DOMES PER LATEST ~''/~i'~ ~ % LANDSCAPE ~ NEIN ~R~P-~FF AREA NEW NEW TREE ~ r FOOT No, 3D4 Trn " ~ , : / r ; ~ Of ~ " 0 PARKING" " 0 PARKING GRATE TYP LAND r~ ( ) /r r ~i,: AREA 01 ~_~--N ( ) Ai LA AREAPE~~ A~~. < CLEARWATER W ' SIGN I EW TYPE I CUR NEW CONC. SWALE VALLEY GUTTER CURB PER SEC C-C EW TYPE I CUR s FLORIDA 33755 ( 1 , CITY INDEX 107 - ' - I GI L I - - -i.-- SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 Drawing Title I h.: ~I I r ~ I `~..._._...~r ~ ~ ~ ',I CIVIL SITE ~ ~ f-~ ~ 111 ~ / - PLAN - ' ' cx V~~~LC~ EX.F,H I ti i~ T I ~ \ ~ ' r~----------'--'----'-'--------- "~i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o . ® ® 20 0 10 20 40 Drawing Number ,77 1 ONE J STSr~_~15"K r t~itir STRUC: C300Ci~~;lll!~ STRUCTURE TO REAo'AIN l , i I I_ ~t. ¦ - I AS-BUILT _ . I DEVELOPER Yz~~t 1 I ' ~°~~Y NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE BLE STORM SEWER PIPE$ SCHEDULE s._T~::mom. ~ ~ ~ - - - .,g zs• K - - N0. STRUCTURE TYPE TOP, ELEV, INV,ELEV. AS-BUILT 5-BUILT LINE LENGTH SIZE TYPE SLOPE AFT) (IN) I NEW M.H 20.60 E ' ~r~,,~ ~.q - _ 2 CITY 'INDEX 302 20F3 .29 7~-E !0.60 E .R11&-eR-€RCP .Q~S I ~ ~ 26.23 AB t~.71' I d I IC ® ~ ~2 - 2~1 214 18 ,g~ HDPE 0.19 AB y rc . NEW M.N .2~-C 20,05 S ' ® n Z1 CITY INDEX 302 20F3 ?.0~2-W~-~ !0,05 S ~ ~ .P-~6-AR'iRCP .9-~.r _ W ~ ~ s 26,95 AB 20,19 W .I 28 ® ® ® ma 25 I•- I 2~ ~ !0,19 W ~ - ~ 82 AB 18 -9R•HDPE 0:10 AB ~ r..r .rrrr..~lm„aaa~,rrwrAm.. .r.elnxv„relArwcen....rr I 1' NEW GRATE INLET r , IS .2'6-6' 19.97 N - 9.97 N !0,04 S 19 162~AB 24 .9R.P~G-81~CP 0.20 'rJ ' ,os' I 2 SEE DETAIL C6.1 26.65 AB 20,04 S - ~ - .p I ~ ~ I o - - - - ~ _ ~ I 1 N i ! . , . ` I 1 NEW GRATE INLET 19.71 N N r._. L:.. L_ L._ I i i . L_.. L.... L.... l__ I. I . I ~ g 26, 66 AB .~9;69-N'+'E 19.66 E f.:! ,dl ~ I ; I I SEE DETAIL C6.1 ~_`~~L~~ LL ~ ~I~~ ~~.-ALL! LL`LL , 9.66E 19 55 30 ~ERCP 0. 9 AB ' ~I ' ; I I I ; I .I ' o o, L~~~L_~~~~LLL~`LLL~LLLLI_`L~L~LLLLL_L~L! 1 FES PER F,D.O.T. ,I ~ N/A .~.9,~1-W' 19,39 W 9.39 W 16 48.5.AB 18 .e~BDPE~ D.$o B Church of Scientology., ~ ; I ~ t---'--:_ i.._ L_. L.... I_.. L... L._ l_.. L... L... ;:..a.... L... L_.. L._ L.~ i_:_ L._ i.._. L._ L_..1...: I_... l_:. L._ f_. 1. ,I , INDEX z70 FLB LANDLORD OFFICE ~T o _ ~ L_ I_. L_ L_ I_. l_ L.: L._ ~ l_ L_. l_ I__ L_ L._ L... L_ L.. I__ L. L_ l._. l.:_ l._. I_.. l_.'__ L_ L._ L._. l.. L_ l i ' ~ ; I ; ; ~ I I I I I ~ 6 CONTROL STRUCTURE .~1-g-Ny~S' 21.06 NW+S 15 . 4 103 18 .~v~ .o:~- 319 S. Garden Ave. 06 NW+S .0R• HDPE. 0.73 AB ' L... L..:. I_.........:. L... ~ L_. L... L:.. L... L._ t L_.. L... L... L.. L... L.... L........ ~ L....._ L._ L_: L_: I_.. L... L.._ L..: ,I , . 1 26:44 AB py~,g .0~3' Clearwater, FL 33756 I ~ ~ ~ ~ EX. RER L BR OGE ; t4 -1~4 ~ 15 HDPE 0.68 tel. 727-467-6583 - ; c~"~ ~ _ L... L..~ l._ L ...:..........1.... L...1.... L.~ L._. L... L.. L.._ L._ L..:1.... L.. L._ L._. t:_. L_.. L_.. i_:. L.. I_._ L.. L._.'...: L.... L.._ i..._ L._ I ~ 5 NEw M:H ,~r~7z~^-~;-M 20.67 SE+N I I CITY INDEX 302.20F3 26,96 AB L _ _ , ~ L.... L._ L... L._ L.... L..:..._ I ~ I I I L ~ ~ I i I L I I I I L_... L... L.-'--- I ` s7 sE+N - fax: 727-445-7277 I 1 t:~ i ~ I r ~ I ~ ~ , ' _ a L_ L._ L._ ~ L.. L_ L._ l_. l~ I_ L._ L._ L_ I:_. I_.. L._ L_ l_ ~ l_..._._ L.. I_._ L_ L_ L_. I:- l_.. L._ ~ NEw M.H 1 sae s+N 14 - 1~3 92- 24~ D o~ AB flblldesigners@scientology.net .92 S+N ~ ~I I I I I ~ 4 CITY INDEX. 302 20F3 26.79 AB ~~'E t , , ~ r--- ; ~ L._ L._ L._ L._ L... L... L.... L.. L._ L..: L_ L_.. L.. I_.. ~ I o ; I , EX. FLAG BUILDING , 21,03 E :0~3 E 13 - 1~0 32 24 DIP* 1. 6 AB : ' I L_I~ ALL. !_L-~LL~~~-~_ I y I ; ; ' ~ , - ~ SIX STORY"STRUCTURE" 11 e _ - ! I ! • ; ' ~ ~ _ L ~ L_ ~ ~ L L_ L ~ _ L L L_ ! ! L_ L_ L L L ` I~ L ~ L ' 4 4 CONTROL STRUCTURE 23.4 (E =n' C_ ~ r - i I I i WITH BASEMENT I , _ 26.5 21.94 W) ..4 (E ENGINEER OF RECORD . x.94 ~W) * 24"~ DIP PRESSURE CLASS 200 I. . _ - J I f 1 1• ' z' i ii ELI-L1`~ LL_L~~LL BUILDING COVERAGE 63244 S.F_L' LLL~LL~L " NEW M.H 26~ -2-A:9#"'s 19.35 S F-- ~ ? _ ~ ; ~ , , n 1 13 CITY INDEX 302 20F3 26.70 AB .1~~75-'NYP' .16.53 NW 9.35 S ' 6.53 Nw EX. STORM SEWER STRUCTURES Z ~ ~ o u'1 -:_LL_L~F L! ~L_`L_~L~ tFIRST FL EL. = 33:96_L_I_L!_L_L~ ~ LL_~ L_' 'I - ~ ~ t~1 i"~• i ; I I ; EX 5 6 I ~ _ L_ L_ l._ l_ L_ L_ L_. I__ l__ L_ L._ l._. l._. L_~ L. L._ L:_ L_ l__ L.. L._ L._ L._ L. L_. l_...__ L_ ~ - - . 1 . o E+w I.~.! ``1 ' -L_L_L_~_L~~L_`L_L_L_L_! ~~L_~LLL~~_L~~ Li LLL~ L~~ L_ 1 ~ ! ' NEW CONFLICT MH, 25,20 AB 16.03 SW 6.03 SW NO. TOP EL. INV. EL. PIPE SIZE ~ ~ " /A~ n~ ro ~y 1{ p p0, z • _ - ~h i~ I ' ~ ~ 17,511 S ~ I ~ r- I ~ _ . L:._ L._ L.. L_ ~ ; I_.. L.._ L... ~ L.... L....1...:1__ L._ ~ f l_:. f.... l.... L._ 1... i.......... I_._ L_.. L.._ I:... L:._ ! L..:1.... 1. ~ I ca i , I I ' I I j ' i i ; V i I I I i 2~~ M ~ , ~`LLLLt_~,_~~_LLL__~L~~LLL~~`L~L._LLL_~L_~~~ ~2 MODIFIED CURB INLET- EX. 22.39.N ST5 . 26.08 EW 15.75 36" RCP W ~ Cn~i W r~~ ~ ` " r,! ~p`° ~~W~i VAS ~ i~. `•~~~pp r• ; i I I I I I y, i 1 24,89 AB W ; , . ~L_LLB,-`L~LL~~LLL_I_L_LL~L~L~~~~~L_~LLL'~~..i 1 z~, SW 20.40 ' 18" CLAY ~ _ _ ~ E ~ ~ ~ a; , _ L: L__ L_ ~ . L. L.. L._ L_ L_ l._ I__ l_. L_ L._ ! l._. l._. I_. I__ L._ L_ L L_ L_. L_. L_.. l_.._~ ~ L I I! s ST3 26.44 E 15.52 36" CLAY ~Za S ~''~1'!~ p~- ^ W - ~ ° , , L... L... L... L...:.... I_.. ! L._ ~ I_.: I__ L... L... L... L_. L... L ; I_. L... L... II , _ tJ ! I ; ; I I I I I ~ i I , W 15.46 36 CLAY W o m U ~ ~,,4 I _ALL`~~~~~~~L~_~~LL_~LLL__`L~~_LL_~`L_~~ TOP GRATE N~ w ~j'~ . ~i ) _ I ~ ~ j l I• I _ !_LLL~~ ~~~LL~_~ L:LLLLL~LI_i_L~ L_-L_L_L_L_LL~ 16A1EAG ~k C5 N 22.39 12" RCP L.o ~ z,o•, t~ ~',~''~e~« 24:47 I 1 ~ I I I ~ , i I! 1 ~ L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ i_. I_ L_ L_ L_ L_ l_. L._ ~ L_ L._ ~ L. L_ L.: L L._ L._ L L_ L ~ II !i . 1 ~N _ L_ L_....._ L... ~ L.... L... L... I_.. L._. L... L_. L.:. I_.. L.. L........ L_. L-•- I--- L.. L... I_... L.....:.. L_:. L.... I_.. L. I ~ ; I E g (f". I ~L_L~~_LOLL`~L"~L~~_LLL~`I~L_~~`LLL_~LL,-L_ i II I ~ N i' LLB ~ ~ L_L_LL~`~ LLL~LLL_~!~L~I~L~L~ LLL'_LLI_L~ 25 N 1 I ~F~D' ~ Z w . I r I _ . _ I-- L_. L_.. i_.. I_._ ~ L._ L_. L...._:. I_._ L.. L__ I_._ L.~ ~ _ L... L.... h L:.: L:_ L._ L... L._ L._. L.... L.. L._ L_ I_. L...: ( 1 I N~N~ o Z ' ! . l._ ~ L~ L_.. f_.. ~ L~: L. l__ L._ L._ L_ L_.:_ l_: I_: L ~ l._ C._. L.. l__ i__ L_ l_ L. L.. l_.. L_ L._ L_: L_ i I. 1 m~ z; ' I ~ i I i I 24 i I II 1 " W a ~ m J~= W o ~ o Z. ` _ L._ 1.... L...1......._ L:_ t.... I__ 1.....1....1....1.:.. L._ i:_. r.... L_._ I_._ L... L.... l._. L....1........_ 1.... L._ l._.1.... ~ I _..1:.:.;__ t..._ L._ i._. L_..._:. I. ~ • - I ,w ~ 1 I • ~M1/ N ~ V O 5s _ - ~ ,I -S z; - m F01m j ; 360'00' P 350.41' F s' I ~ GI ~ 3 ,4 ',i 1 W a ' r,. M1' i , ml..rr ? +n v r. .mn.,n„ac° lae 24 M 1 I 4151 - - - _ I~,..1 ; I ~ - - - - , .I,._. FRANKLIN STREET Date issued: o7r2s~os ..~:I:~~..r omr r/ i ; ~ xlwuxns.Tercewux ruwcnnu 31 j 1 . ~ r ro , - ;'uu' Krc,;; ~-o~- P/AY s,,~;,~ri - - - - - - - - - - - - - ::r~.;~. e. z Project Number, 06.10 _ :,...n 7 inn , I:.._,. ~ ii 1 9' , @ _.--frllY..... z_.~_.. u,.., ' ill rlr / nlr'r: ~uJ . AP„CI~,r. , ->_,3. _ . _ n,] I ~ vrrlx.f Sl}Y I:IfiIN m ,1ViT ftuP ..n....v._ ._.__._._t~ ..................6.714-_.__._.__. ' a eirrwi ririririrr rir:w: iF Et ' L,TA» • . i ' ~ r rrr:, r r r,i,r,rw i,r, r,rwr,rr:,r. .bi,ir. w.r i,:m,rir w xis v Desi ned r by: KR .:r:. w: P rir r:r:riri.u:r~r:r:.:w ¦uiw:r~ri¦ ,r:.. r w, r r~¦ r r r m:r ..r r . ~ Revised by: KR _ 1_ : : _ _ ~ ®m,r rr mrrrmm rrrm'~v rr0r rmlrm rr rrrr rrrmvr rr rrrrrrr CNY ~q CEf.rfR."^._. .4 _ _ I_ b S,LI'i 1~Y tv. J:o G lR....N, fJ 3;~nj `e' ' l ' ~ ~ 3S%ORF! , 20-F-.?`o PVC A022 0~ rrrp. F~.p ~n,l rr~.ll.mrlrrrmmr rrmm~W "r~. ?6'a-S-C?ua:t-( .r 1fLMh!OL.• ~ rrr r,r rrui" rrrr j irrri®~7, OL O 0./-,_r ~ rr mmrrrwr rs mrti f • - Drawri by: ~ , im e,.wm r.r FX donStOA,h!Wh?N•• rnrmrrma-T,Irr~.umsirr.wmr.em rm rm em mr s.mmoarr mmwti rm mmw ~ ~ . ; .9 .r; .a.. .z.sQ 'a~~~ 3 ~1 - _~_-~°'~:fa`.2'r~ x,M tisena~rnr. 12 I 10}'- - . w 7~ . 1/ 1-i$2 G.a RPf ..0_. urh In !i~~@ j~ty A,,,, -----o• ~ - _c:~L"a~:i~~4S!s7t~_s:_ _w~.:r ,_y"'.a...{~I~~'•'48,5-- r, r ' - OUG@l/~ 1 ~~O.~iPIhV~'vv/ - WAq,b i/ 10"- ~ n .....S--~O~G"'~ ~f~„ ,C~!~ t?~ ~FUI56%' h_~ ra•E; t ~r'rs_w:~>,_._.,-.x!14-_ 23 .1.. . ' ..._JL_..,_...~t:_w ~ ,.~r~m . - - _ . - ~ r ,VN.It m Nfrt ~iT' l r w ~~ti~l Z '~~y 'r~ 'I~ ~~~'w ~ f~~ Revisions: ~ ~ I - I 1 ! I .,~.I' Itl`C IlU L`C. :.L~(Yi \ '00 1 Lr ....rrrr rrrrl. rr;~rF.rr~r„r.~ r rr rrr r1,r ee.e' " a I ~ ~y ,rf~ ~ No. Date Description - 1 u I E3i:NG GrC SIORY .d ~ p0''~`.. fV._. L_..L._ ' ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~°4 ~ . 2 3 I~~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 09J01 /O6 CfiY. COMMENTS " - - t m crRUCnJ.PE TG RF4;l.W ~I ° ~ ( ~ Fi ~'I ~ 0 1 ' NEW STORM DRAINAGE LINES I . 1 ~sJr °„,,r,'I:~,,,, sr. .1 1 I " =i ~~Ra~~: e N ; N... t._. : L~ l_. 1.-. L._ L._ i_._ ~ l._ L I L._?4, ~ l... L.. I i.._ l 1 . ~ ~5 LN ry ~ , ~ I i4__. i y trr. = zrss. I >ai 1; ~i t,~~ LENGTH - - 1 ~tp 1 "1 t on~wnv . LINE LENGTH 1YPE DIA: SLOPE sLDPE AB ;I-.-.-:! ' k a5N'f.,.% l_:: L..1.... L.... L_ ~LLL~~_LL_LI_LLL_~~.LLLLL LLLL-:LL.~ ~ ~ ~L_.~" ',I ~~-III 2 I :1v ,'+1 ; ~ ni ~ r ~ . r.. , 1 0a LOADING ,1 I ~ 1 ; 22-21 214 Ff: f.R6P"-fjt~ HDPE 9R-PVC" 18 . 0.19 % ~a~ ~A ~p 1 r~~' '~z L_ L_ ~ t 1..:.1....1.:..1..._ l . i..... L... l.... L.. L.. ' .,1...: L... L... L:...l.. - L.... L...1... I.. L....l...'....' ' ~ i ~ ~ . ~ . r...: L:.: L_. ~ ~ I ~ 3 I ~ PROP08EDAREAOFCENf,2Al. ; ~ . i ~ ~ ! F f P~ JECT L L ! L COMMISSARY &LAUNDRY.900DS.F L L L i~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ' . _ ~ ~ L. L ~ ~ ~ eo~woARY 4 h I :!vv I ° 1! $e ~ s 126:98 22-23 25 Fi: DIP PRESS,CLASS-250 18 10 . A59'%' 0.48 I'i ; ° 1 i i I~ s ,i a 1 as ~ L_ L_ L_ r _ DIP PRESS:CLASS-250 i - - - r° , I ~ ,I ~o~ 23A-24 53-IY 52 FT. DIP PRESS:CtASS-350 2-12 ID I1.7~1" 4.39 % ~ ; ' °t al ! ~ ~1 1' ~i , . L_ L. l._. L_ l I L l_ L_. l ~ L .I L ~ ~_.l.-. L-_ I-..1.._ L _ L._ 1.-. L ! ~ ~ ~ I l ` l ~ ! , R 'E ' 5 _ - 24-24A 24 FT, HDPE 15" „ 0.29 % ' . ! ~A~rfE z ; ~ ! I :1 la L.. L.... t I. I r r;r ~I=1'3"i'1J" E~ i e~1~ •Jr I ~.:.1.: L:.:. I L... I I L.. ~ . ~ L : i ~ L... L.... I... L.:. I I:- ' . 1 ~ i.. f . L:.. L. ~ I I i... , F r. , s 24A-25 24 FT, HDPE 9R-PUC' 15 D.59'%' 0.21 % _ ! ~ i ;~1 fR F ,I i~l rl 9 ~ L_ L_!-'`~L_L_'_L_L_ L_I_.LL i_L_LLLLI LI _..I I _L _l ± L..f__~LL! F`; ~ 25-26 2.16-f~: 217 FT. .F.&GA-8a HDPE ~-PUC' 15 4,29-%" 0.30 % i r I - ~ , , i "1 1, _ i I 26-27 ,fi7-t'P: : 69 Fi. f~P'BR' HDPE 9R-PUC' 15 .0.29'%' 0.06 % N 00"0~ 00 N%;, i e~ 1 z ' 5 04'33,~9n "a ~I 1"I~ss.A•_ . I r _ 4' ma~,waxr r y`!. 4(i'(9rj'° 1 E'x'S71NG G,.E' & live $TURY 1 ul ' ~ 2~~, Jr4 h! y ; m ~ L L ' 27-28 . 128'FT. HDP OR-PHC' 12 . 0.31 % ~ ' 1 s,Rt,c;uoE rG a~r.~,rrl I : i ~ ~ i ~I ~ N1 ,a ,rr I ; ~LL~ L_L_LLL.~ ~ L' L_LL' ~.LL!_L_Li_L_`_~.I '~LL_'~ I x: LLB m 24-31A -66~T: 67 FT, HDPE 913-PUC' 15" . 0:69 % i r - . ~r'JU5 U~nDEN I+VE. .1 '~I - p : 1 ¦o oa 31A-31 .144-fP." -143 Ff. HDPE 9R-PVC 15 „ 0.44 % ~ i LSE .ss i 1 ! m[ ~ ~+ma ~I+~ ~'~°:~`°ma l._. LI~W l L l l._. ~ L._ L._ I__ L._ L._ i _ L:_ L_ L_ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! L E_:_ L._ L._ L_. i_.._.. ! ? ~ ~ $ ~G,iV.,SJe JDe ~F66, C A~lul I i , ,4w._ , PROPOSED- I , ~ ~ > 31-32 94 FL .HDPE il&-PVC'. 12 11.58'°1' 0.61 % i i :d oi~ ~I ' ~ 14 . 6 ~o_ ~ L ` ~ ~,~.~~.~--~gih.Itsr~eA...: L.._ L. I l f.._ ~ l.. l I 1 I ' `PARKING STRUCTURE ~ • ~ ~ ' ? ~ W' i ~_L_L_`i LLL! i LLL_~LL_~ LI LL_~I__ ' ' e" ~ PRELIMINARYSEf 1,\ i 1 ii i rn °''~I ' nsvw;tr OBE iAY x 10_ L_ L_ " 4 STORY STRUCTURE- I ~ ? `L_L!,.~ LLL. L;._L.L ~ ~L 42 PARKING SPACES--`•-LL_LL I j~~ L ~~L_L`~ ~~~'_~~LL_L_"_~ ~ ~LL_L 53,230 SQ. F1:_LL_LL-L.L_~ ~ _ ~ PERMITTINGSE~ NEW STORM DRAINAGE STRUGTURES ; ' i ; r ~ 1 1 ~ f L_ L.- L_ L- I-- L._ ! l ~ I l._ l-' I • I--- I-- L..F.. EV 27.75-27. D , I I L L ' r - 1 1 I 1 I cr. ~s-r. PnVF.61ErJl .I i~? k!~ oo t. . ~I ~ i I I .F , I CONSTRUCTION SET --..1....1... L... L--. I_.. L._ i. L_ L_. L... l.. ' I L.~ L_. L.... l_ ; 1... L._ r I L. i I L..:.... ~ f ~ ; ~ ~ ~ THROAT I ° ° o - ° ~ L L_ ~ t. _ ~ „1;: I 1 STRUCTURE T(PE ELEV, ELEV, INU. EL k" LL_L,._I_~LL~_i_I_ _1.1.._L_L_~ ,_!_L_L~_L_LL~ ` i I ~_L._~~L~ L_ ~ s; ~~;I I f a,~e1.' i ° ; i _-_E~° Of PAYS.?Li "1 1;~ . ~n 27. L L ~ 1., r-ccxwuEre ~ II ~ calEt'ri~- s' 1 1., 263R' 20.25E 20.60E AB a YA7X1ti0~ 5i I II tl. i w ° ; e .G,,O" ; ,r 1 IE ~ - L L_ I NEW M,H: INDEX 202' 1 OF 1 O Fr<n ' . ~r : 26.23 AB 20.72 N AB _:I, I 1 " ! ~ 1 / _ ' r"r•-- ' ` 1 1~ 27.75 ` C; r>: / i I 1C1 rrrr rv;.~ ~h-'-'-~'.~.~._._ 2' I LL~~LLL~ ~LL.~! ~ LL_L`~LLL~ L L~L~LL~_ I ~ sECITwP/RGE .1 'S ~ I i L._ L._ L_. l_ t L._ L._ l._ L__ l_.. I L ~ t.-_.-_ i L._ ! (I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ v ~al li! 1•' 1S/ORdI -'[rafE 12 RCI.'I_'fF4.F B I ~.r`/' - - z " 3 J,B; INDEX 207 1 of 1 26,12 20.85 W+5 20.84//W+S AB 7; i~ ill I i c, frc ,.rwrG;E 'yal,roLE ql,~ i s 'e?ce 1 1~ Q 'h0;.. ( ) 1 ) b w. 5~ Y .1 , . ~ ~ • I ~ s-s 6ry s g I ..1:....... -~ti ~ ~ - 'hD L... L.._ ~4~9.._ L... l._ L L... L__ L..: l._ I f 1.... I I L... I:_. L..... :1.... ~ I L........ I , c~ - p U~ 1 EXiS'Lri'G C;,E SlURY ~ t O 2a C. .7...G ° U;~ 2?.JE 1 ~ I I - I - ~ 1~L,. CU9C%2Erc' d:JC°l STRUU'rrkE ` 1 ~ ~Atrr C''rl;f = 10.5' I i 27.251 ~r,m+ ~r "~I L I J,B. DOUBLE WING INLET ?.6~8'~. 9' 230 N '~„51n'Q'~'R-• ~ , „ ! H.P. re,rryl is 23.02 N AB vaurr-:a,'m lyri" rG Re,.:vx :1 54NbaR. 1 27,7 _417 I . 1.~ j l,!.11.HOlE ~ -°U7+'CRJL~' 1 1 . INDEX 209 1 of t 26.73 AB 25,83 AB "21.0 E 20.63E AB , 17ji1• k31S er,'z~rN ru% ( i ° ,,-•.o REU?JJ I _ rotE ~i „ - . ~ ASYHAL, 1 , "fr 1 . L_ ~ a~,wk~d..vau~r l I i I ~ .I.:. L:. ~ ..III ; 1 I ~ c (1 ; I ~ I I L: ~ , PINELLAS COUNTY 4 23.4 N 23.51 N AB ; ~ ]8.81 ~ I 1 e ao 4 2~ J,B. INDEX 206 1 of 1 O O ~ „~,r GR,rf ~ ° 0 1 1 u ' i¢ ' ' ' . i...-y"DEP.S`N. i..: is L... I ~ ' I . L 1. L . L.: I.:. I... f_ I l . l..1 1 ~ I i I I . ~ I~ I :111., n i; .rue , . i R JECT 272 ° <'.:; •I~ ~ I 27.50 AB 23.48(W) 23.39 W `AB r.ve M.>'+~tR ~ c~ ~ ~..'i- 80UNDARY _ 1 1 a Ixe't:~ ? ...i '~i° r r rrr, r w I r' 'z1 15 r.... L . a, L3.75 I N~ ~ ~ . ~ L.. I__ L_ ~ ~ L_. ~~E~i ~ I... I_.. L._ ~ L_.. L ~ L L L._. I__ 1.-- ~ _ L_ l I . L ~ i ~ r,; : . 23.4(S) 23.22 S AB r, - ( 14,3.J5' . ~ L,.( 26.27(NW)-4 CONDENSATE. 1 '-°~,'5 AGLEY r„•'•'w e1~S, , ~ _ 57GRla a 1 ~ •x„ • _ s „ f , g: 1., ° +R C S pay !dgldF;G_LC Reti Fruxr, y 5A5 . 3.75 I I ~ 1 I r ; i 12a1,o~ ~ : i ~ I ' L i ' I~ ji; APP/Permit No: EX .Date. L.:. L. I . L..:1.... L... i.......... i L... L.... I~` l ssat me7tG L.... ...22.4N ' I ~ ` 7:21-AP i; ~ - FB ~ FLS2006-04023 , 24.27//NW -8 RL-NYLOP T. 24.02 NW AB I ~r!!~~ - ~ - ,?,,7'' 1„, •-'r S„ jl A,m gl sA ~ 26:40-a6 •a w~,,~U~urarW~cr U teats. o.P 7.7 P - ~ „ ~ ;i iiiGi{G'ti~l"'rB4.,~'.`.-- rr'Lv r. 17+V. d8.8r r 25.44 NW -4 FM ! S;CR,f ~ ~ _ ; , y ~ ! rr r. P~ "ER ~ f `ti d I ~ ,~o ( ) I , aauavtE ~ ' 1 ; 1 ~ r'aM.%>f ~ 28.91 ti ~0 ..Z~.. :..............r....... { 397 FB~ ~.F ,Ua - , V a %s ~%~n,.r , I I I 4 r IL cc,•_FFIL- D° I - ~ 1%J1T li ; 1 1 IT' NG1eP 1 2 J I. 1 r, a l;! f„0 l , „ ~11,.eE J.B: INDEX 206" 1 of l 27.6 20.84 N 20x74 N AB ~ 21 ; 1 I i ~ ~ u i h 1 ,,,,mml,Ea?r~fii6ca. ~~~,alt„eE,,,,~~,Y,F,t,,,,,,,,,~~~®~ ~ ~ UTILITIES" BCP2003 08679 COMPLETED ,,,r.,,, - ~ 'l ~ I f~ 23,52 S 23:44 5 AB i a l: ; h i ~ 1 y s - , I,_,_ 1 ` P 1 ~ „ d 2 1 ..F IAt zr,o ~ ~ ~ _~,I ~ UTILITIES BCP2004-06322 COMPLETED w~u. so~'~~ 19.87-Ab ion a,,{'~- ~ \ ~ 5 J,B. INDEX 206 1 of..l . ,2~;9' 23.64 N 23.39 N AB ; i ' i p, ~ "i ~`3~.~? i"`•~ 1 g rg - °,r a ~W_ ~'RS EXISTING CENTRAL ENERGY PLANT ; ~ _ ~ \ ~ SWFWMD 44022985.00.1 UNE 11,0 27,92 AB 20.95 S 20,79 S AB ~ ~ - i ci.} 1 , I 1 ~ 1 ay - 05'C0,`.CREiE CL7B 1 2 t• ~Np //~~,,~iy~U•g~r^~-~£X~11ETfyNpS]IO~N-{Jy~' ~yeq r~ 1f,22A r~T, i 1 r ~ ~ 24.07//W - uF,:;asr,ev I I of„lo:.ls,t=o - ~ _ ~,P ~ s,~ `~J _ l) , III 1 ' RRn~ rc s,a,t° r S/F'4r+. 1 ^jvgt{ots„.n y, , r ~ NP22D( a . ( ~ 'I t"noRrp°t.'ricr{I"' f..,v,. rosusrY ^5~ 0~'3~ r~ ,I x .26,681 P' ?1~0~ 24.07(S) . 24.05(S) AB is ; cv.Nr°rr1r.,, I i ~ ~n~r;~t~„~r/a i ~AP,~ ae z A,./ 26 LY '~Np1~2~(S~la7~' it ia' t~ F.2: E'L''V. ~tt.r; ~ i - ~ ~~~QD~u.F~ I~ ~ 1 ~ I J,B. INDEX 206.1 of 1 i " a.,.;o(r,r) ei 2 .2 24.5(SW)-3 CONDENSATE 245D(SW) AB ~ ~ i - ~ ~ + 7 1 AB „ r; ~ I 1 i oi~ - ~ I l °Z-AB ~ 1N • ~a I~ ~ ~ ~ Project Name 24.5(SW -10 RL-NYLOPLAST 24.50(SW) AB !d 00 d~'r,/t7" bt, ' I i ~ i 1 I, I ' ~ I I FLAG BUILDING AND ~ 24.5(W) 2436(W) AB :,t.;,LE. i I ( i P e, r ; ~;ti I 1 wn I'~ J,B. INDEX 206 1 of 1 .28:03' 24.20E 24:11 E AB I ' ~ i I 1 i ~ ^ . I , ~ • h'~ 6-aB E -F 2382-as ~ , ; PARKING GARAGE 6:39-p0 26.75-AP I I , 26.DD rl I 1 ' a . ®s~ . rre arm . . s .m 4~ '•..JS• j'~ { ~ 4 ? \ • 26. li" 25,68 S AB I-----r--•.------•-.""~•'w+~ r,rr r r rrr r. r•m ~ r e r ,wr., r rrrr.. r w rr,6d.1 . 25.5(S)-10 RL-NYLOPLAST - -,•~-,f------- - ---rsse=-,rn-FF~-era- ' ,eat Aa i, ~ r r ¦ wrwrw ¦ r. r~r~, ~ ~ _~m~ w w wrw_w. ~ .w~ ~ ~wl~ ~ . w.rww g !._.......t . + ' ~.r 5r~~`,,r'r},ji'rr~r rr rrwrrrr rrlT «_•~i_ . r ~ ccr,rafr.E !i. z" c: 1 nays' r,'d ~n • • i 4 nuSTt ~ . ~ . _ _ _ AB nnraraxnemorer aj~ ,AB .`'Z(, ~ aRWX. u1'. 04C, SU'I fk "t0 I li ; r, r: -w . w m. w . f.,-. au_w-w.___.--•-•---r~--- - ° f ~ ~~i 24.75(E) ~y~_ i - - - - - - - - - - - - '~--w - w-u-~- -m-«°- -W_,n_~._°n_._w_.. e~~ ~ ~ .A..2 C u'(~ k ~ ~ ~rre,.r~<:.',a. -i:frw~. w. ~ ' x :r . G ' _ ' _ $ J,B: INDEX 206 1 of 1 ,2g3' 27.0(S)-3"CONDENSATE ..._t..- .....__.........=J~___-:~~~~.ni,r........`..~._,..,~.:.'-..:........_.........'`... ~.°,r,_ + _ 29.28 AB 27.0 SW -3°FM 26,90 SW AB " '"•'~``-r z' cuncserE r' cu,°'G ! cw+lE r•.t_r fmrwuramm - ~ . . ~I a , ::,r;:.:..:... K„ ,~•~r•:ea,:R ~ 3r~Q:~12_~ r-~~r;Pa F Prolect Address I 26J5(S -1D RL-NYLOPIAST 26,74 S) AB e # crJ ~ i ; waLVC i e'~un>~iae~fRODE>:rs~ r5r wxe t• cvr I e j ? sa"rraRr ~ , swnwr . 23,81(E+W) 23,85 E+W)AB ,;,.,N«F ! ^ w,w~te STREET a ~~.~b:AR ~ ~ 215 S. FT HARRISO F ~ , (~i J.B: INDEX 206 1 of 1 „ ; s•,A ~ ~ ° ~ 27.63 AB 23.93(N)-8 RL-NYLOPLAST 23.85 N) AB t~ ¦ ¦ w'w ¦ wlwr. m rrrr mr r!r m's' w,. m'. _ _ _ _ Iw.¦ r r¦ wu . ¦:r,¦ r.w,¦ rw.m r w v err r~r.e w~rrn¦ ¦~w wrw.w ,ir mrw r sr . ~r°r frxu+~. ; . UP' RlG; li'. rp _Wq? 'lr'1JiNj I .~Er'.gGF I e 4G i f i r s~r r ¦~r:w ¦!ra bVl FNdY }rir: r.r.r r:aw.riw:m v.r r s rrir•r vrr v r w•w w:..r r r w:w w.r:.:w w:w ¦u ¦:r ¦ r r:r. ~r_r-r:pi.} I ~ - _ - - - - . - - - - - - CLEARWATER 1 ~ - - - F = I U Q~ 28.93 24,53(E+W) 24.48(E+W) AB 31 J:B. INDEX 206 1 of 1 26.98 AB 24:93(N)-12"RL-NYLOPLAST (~l , , I FLORIDA 33755 a! - .J, ii'nl f'1 25.6 NW -4"FM 25.33 NW AB s~wr+.Rr' I~~',ro,.E ' `h R EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES ~~GLf ~ 44J - ' ~ -J~: \L^ I a Drawing Title 25.OD E 25.05E AB EX. STORM M.H. 1Q EX. STORM M.H, 02 I EX. FLAG BUILDING 30,00' RIM EL. 26.06 .RIME : NOTE: 3~2 J.B: INDEX 206 1 of 1 30 26.94 N r 26.91 N AB „ L 26.24 " .O6 AB 26:33 N)-8 RL-NYLOPIAST 2631 N) AB N. INV, 14.53 24 RCP N: INV, 16.03 36 RCP NOTE: " „ REFERI E. INV. 14,55 48 RCP E. INV. 14.55 36 RCP REFERENCES TO THE PARKING SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 ~ & EXISTING 1 5. INV. .19,27 36" RCP W. INV, 14.25 36" RCP 43 NYLOPLAST 8° INLINE DRAIN" 33.45 GARAC 26.59 (FUTURE). GARAGE ARE INCLUDED;FOR W. INU. 14.55 48 RCP N,E. INU. 21.47 15 .RCP REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLYAND SCALE. 1 "=4~' DRAINAGE PLAN n NYCOPLASi 8" INLINE DRAIN 33.45 25.15 l~ImIRFti S.E. INV. 21.48 15" RCP S.E. INV, 21.29 12" RCP REFERI ARE NOT PART..OF THE FLEXIBLE " S.W: INV.. 22.83 15„ RCP S.W. INV. 21.82 12" RCP ARE N( 45 NYLOPLAST 8 INLINE DRAIN 33.45 25,15 (FUTURE) N.W. INV. 23.06 12 RCP NA . INV. 21.92 15 RCP ) STAND 46 NYLOPIAST 8 INLINE DRAIN 33.45 24.83 (FUTURE) EX, STORM M.H. 3 STANDARD DEVELOPMENT Drawing Number 0 RIM El. 27.34 APPL~G APPLICATION. INDEXES ARE CITY.OF CLEARWATER E. INV. 14.01 48" RCP 40. 0 2040 80 S. INV. 13.94 48" RCP S.E. INV. 23,07 12" RCP PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI7Y OF CLEARWATER I DEVELOPER _ I I I i I ~ , r , t _ _ ~ ~ . ~ 5 I 1 - ~ - rn~ X - _ I , ' ! ,I _ - - c~p d ~ ---_z---_ - - ~ _ 1 _ I F~ h _ _ ~d l~ e \ lU Rt i VIaTER TU REM°11P~ I~~ I ~ - 4) ~ r°j U I I ~2!~ I 9 ~ ~ m x Ev,.~." SAPL~fO 1?.EMP,IN rl" ~ C~J~ i al 1~~ ~a~(~ MOS. C~[~mimil i immismioml~Y?m;miim~i®vi0itmimoimimimiomimimi®ilmuimniwimimliimlmimi~~mm~~ µtmi®i~i~i~,m~imoimoi®i®iamlilmi~3®ilmie~wiwlnmim~ 0~ 1 ~)J . - - a~ e; 0'0 G?I`~ I Y+4 31~~, ~p p Ir r.• ~ e~ i '~\'~q ~I~ 1~1~'•`~QGc; _ - '-G~:- ~.®`~l, m,m~v~®~ ®~0~®~ ~®~®~®~m~rla.~~0~®~®~vl®~®~~~~~A~~..~~ ~'~~fi.,l,~ r m~®~`~ P, „E r,• 4 3 a I1` _ - Church of Scientology `5" b - .E v 11 ~ r II o - a ~ _ - y _ , CPv'1l ~J m x' FLB LANDLORD OFFICE F 1 ~ ~ I A} 319 S. Garden Ave. ~I I Clearwater, FL 33756 r 1 ,..~,I, - p.. na. 6.~t ova 1~ ~ ~ fi@9 O -A_ ~ Eti~ y r _ _ , tel: 727-467-6583 1 7 `l•' w~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rl~' ~ ti~ Z7 I fax: 727-445-7277 x x F,x y x x x Q o 0~ 0 ; flblldesignersQscientology.net I ~ ~ ~a Baas ~ ~IH.' • ~ I ~ o,ti ~1 ®®®12&Ef PRiVA'fF. 12"4 IIDPE STI~~~~ ' ®,~69FL PRIVATE 15'4 HO I 3FL PRIVATE 15"4 HORE,~TAI®~ I~ ~ T - I I f' v 1 d 1 ^J •-I ~y~~" ~0 29.1 29.1 ~ ~ 0 1 o tia• J ~ . 350.00 P 3. 150.00 P 350:0 I26 ~ I I ~ I ~ ENGINEER OF RECORD 1 ~ I ? 26.'10 I cD I 1 tea. 1 0 ~ ~ • 33.4 49.9' 49.T 0 4 J. T I I ..'ll I I~ ~ ~ 1 `h x ' e~° ~ % X ^ 3 .60 + , 33:60 1 'ti~~ I,,~sl, prj 't ~ ' G o °j ~ ~ ~ ' ' N IO n~ r ~9' a ~ (~I a r. ~ t ' 1' y SIGHT I I I I Z~~ ° !t~ VISIBILITY ~ ~I I i ~ ~ 4" II, i C~ I 13.8' 'h T -h 1 1 958.3 i ^ 3195 33.70 33.70 TRIANGLE I I , p ~c~ti a II Ci 9 1 I ~I' , c I 't v , o o l ~ ~w m~ ~'•"'ji J . M ~ I ' .h.l ~ '~+~.J! i o oa y r , YJ G ~ x a z ~ • Nil VI II ~ ~ - , I a. ~ ~ f0x- W o ~ Td i lu M i ' UW ~~~~~e,,~ 33.70 10 ~ r I~ i- I 1 ! . - '31 I NEW 6 DIP SAN,- NEW 6" DIP SAN, m I I ~ I i F-= N~'~. I a INV. 28,03 INV. 28,03 Jo.2' 1 .1 - ~ ~1 i ~ _ ~ ~y1 .o I' i y~ ~ - 90.2' of ~ 0 Iti-------.... m ~ I o E 5 J ~ f _ _ Il-------.-.... o~ _ ~R3 WhI~BPP ;8J . _.,1., _ I I F ~ ~ m a ~ ~ tl = ~ Q 1 hv' ) ~ ~ II I J ) ,~X. OVERHEAD WAE ~ , ~ FIRE PI ~ Q ~ E ~ 6 QIP WhiE61 ~ ~ n I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'"°o~ I n FIRE PUMP ~ ' W` I x NEW I DIP SANI Rool z I DIP $AN, ROOM % o - .~IIF~JidT~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z w Exoo~ua - - - - - _ ~ INV. 8~ 0-= _~E' - L---- I . 6.4' w 90,2' i I 1 I ~,„Jl ~ o z 11 ~I 1 I a ! ' ^ _ .'-`III - ~ ~ ° I ~'1I 1 al li~rEi] I ! n7 ~ y~o W U ~j J' R ii l.. l it ' .IJ~ ! 0 l 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Date issued: 07128106 z 1~ ~N_ 1 li f,~ . x ~ ~ c) ~uEtt~--~ I I _r ~ ~ ~ ~ F Project Number: Qs-~ Q I rya' a~ a 1 I ~ 11- ~ 33.60 M ~1 ~tr I 9 w ~ `~i Designed by: KR _ ~ e :~-.Lu,..~..~_~..il ~ ~ / I__ I a` _ AZ ` I Revised by: ~ ,1~ I i i ~ - ~ Drawn by: I~ I RR ~ 'b~ ~ ~ I ~ iRANS~4~RIC~~- N EEECIRICA ~ ~ I ~RA,NSE4RMER~- - ~ ~ ~ ~ j I i 1 ~ ~i NEW s DIP, saN~ - I Revisions: NEW fi" DIP, SAN. ca. ; ° ~ 6 as I ! t,,. F~ a' - ti INV. 24.84 INV. 24.84 ~ ct ~tt~a s - I ! No. Date Description I a 1 ~ ~ , n i 1. ~ G' - I ~ I I I I -.J.F, , I ='m 1 04/01/06 CITY COMMENTS I - ~ •~='1 - ii I I I ~,.I - i t I I ~:r I ~ - ~ 2 10/02/06 CITY COMMENTS I---I ,1Y; ~ ~ ~I~?' 'r- ~ ~I T Y~ ~ , I ! I . ~l J r' 9f~~,~, r > > ~ I l ~ NI ~ ~ k~ ' ; I _ - , I He - I S 1 ~ .I I I - ! I 6 I~I - _ 1 ~I 1~,rti... ulw ~ ~ jl C~ ,~801.IDWASTE~, ~I I - „l~ - _ I ) ' I ~ 7w~ +itEGYGLING . t.l,l I 1 P ; I 1 (COMPACTOR).: .~SOI:ID WASTE.-, A ~cV I g' ---~-+$EGYELING--- A ~ ^ ''til I ~5 X i c~-' 'i I I A._ 1ST FLOARJ (COMPACTOR).. • - ` ry I ~ `..~STFLOORJ- 6.as scia ; .I ~l : , nP:,,i , I ~ ~ I T ~ `hW Ili i Q' y.5 - I I Q, I L . _ - i "'~'I j { ~ ~ ~ ~ PRELIMINARYSET ~ I 1 ~ 1! ' I 1 _ ~ ! III GREASE ~`-I~ ~ ~ a ~I ~ ~1 ~ PERMIITINGSET -q b ~ y~~ I TRAP II ~ry 1 33.80 III (BASEMENT) I I~ iE I ! ~i z6.a2 h a iiW ~ ~,I ~ ,Nn , i ~ ; , _ ~ CONSTRUCTION SET I ~ I ~ ~L. ~CO ~ I I I ~ ~ I ~ I I I I 0` 1~, x I I i I~ ii 1 I I ~ i m', ~ w_ ; ~ w ~I I I~ ~ , I p I 9 I 5EC / TWP / RGE 1, ~ l~' LE GONCR@ ~ E 1 I ~f~r q,~ f-~ JANITOR I~ ~ I I 1 n I CLOSET II, SANITARY I I II SANITARY ih - i ~ 16.29S -15E I l _ G', I {BASEMENT) I,~ SUMP II ~ ~ I I i, (BASEMENn I I ~ - 1 ~~a 111 ~ ; ~i, (BASEMENT) I ~ ' ~ 4Z I r ~•~j , - , ,1 I .v. ! " 'L--~ Lv.- ~ .e~' ! PINELLAS COUNTY = I 1_`__ • I ` ~ i r,, 9 ( n ~ - ~ 0,1:1, I ~a'~ „ 5.0' N - ; App/Permit No. Ex .Date HWS&R _ I ~~o A I . "40 OF I'~: , FB FLS2006-04023. HWS&R I i B ~ _ = CH4VS&R - 1 I ' CHIVSB^R I , ay~l ~ X ~1 6 1 n I.I - ~ J I i ! UTILITIES BCP2003-08679 COMPLETED 1 - 1 ~ NEW 6 DIP SANITARY I I o' ~ ~ INV, 29,11 1 '0' 26 I B I ! UTILITIES BCP2004-06322 COMPLETED - ° ~ ry ~ NEW 4° DIP SAN. P.~I, RELOCATE EX. ur: " - ~ _ , 1~ 9 I ! n A I~ ! r! X X X ~STM M.H. rrr INV. X9,83 1 33.70~58.3~ 33.70 - I 43.9' ~ A ~ , ~ I ! SVJFVJMD 44022985,001 UNE 11,0 . ti" " 4 I ~g r ~ ~ 51.6 - - r ~ - ' Q ~ a ~ c.a - ~ ~ ll ~ ~ ! ~ I I ~ tr. ~ 33.80 33.60 L:' I SIGHT t0 ~ 350 00 (P)4183 . i ' , VISIAILITY 32 ~ ~ 50'00'(P)~J 8350.44'(F) 24 ' v , Project Name O~ ~ ~ a tl ~ ~ ~ TRIANGLE 10 1 ~ , , ~ ~ 3 ~ ~a a ' ' FLAG BUILDING O ~ - ' r ~t u;f ! I ' a ( 1 30.06 - , , , o 27 7 1 ~ 'L STI~1 ®®I ~ . o, 1 ~ . ~ , ~ ~ ® 143F'L `"a Hl)f ~ ~ 6'FL PRIVATE 15 I I I ' NOTE: Iml'`6'FL PRIVATE 15°m 11DPI iTM - "%'f1. n i ~ ~ - I 1 II ~ 1 ' ~ 89 55 0 ~x ~x ~ ~ i ~ i mw n~' i 0~me i ~ i~ ~l~ .LI~AN. A61 ~ ®i m I 1 ~ f; ~ X r x rk ` - - ~ z.z ;'Z , k ~ I;I ~ , REFERENCES TO THE PARKING ~ II ~ m,~~, C i ~®m. m,®,,~.o,® m, ~`~®®m, ~ ~~®®®m~~,. J~.-4 ER.u6W,diP,m ®nii~~ m®..~mEi.fi°A{4d1Eam~~1Ar®®m®,,,~0®®m,®o~~~ ~®e,. h~ ! a' b 28 40 S rl, r~ • ,,a rh h. _ ®I ` ~ ~ 3 41 ' ~ GARAGE ARE INCLUDED FOR 1 ' ti ti ,a <Q 0 ti ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ Itil' ;t ~ - ~ 4 z7.o Tc i - ° REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND ~ ~ , , X ~ x x o 26.50 •SX , `t'~ X ~ - I 0 - . ;~I ~ ~ 'w ~3® ~ ARE NOT PART OF THE FLEXIBLE PrajectAddress 'i~ i ~ n°J ~ ~~U 41 a~ r"J ~'q) ?7 •~ti' U~ix ~1 Za. ~ ~ ~ r~. ~ ~ ~ ~ y. 7.0(1; I~ 9 _ ~.o~; ; I ~ ~a a ~ hc~ STANDARD DEVELOPMENT 215 S. FT HARRISON AVE. 1~ ~•,al' ~ I~' 27.25 , ,;4~ 28.17 r, ~ ~ EfISTIPJG 10"A SAPIITRP,Y ~ APPLICATION 1 ti~ ,~4> _ MA!'JrOL} tit' ti'' - yw. ti-.-. _ ; , CLEARWATER ~ 1 - ~ Erl,;,tir, aCP sroRl~ l ~a ,fig I~ I I I ~1~ I ' Imo, r' ®`~~''®I ®I . ~ I ~ ; ~ I ~®I I ®I~-- I ®~II,~~~I_;~ I~:~~~~ FLORIDA 33755 ~ a I I IG I ~ ( ~~iI 3 _ ~IA"M'_h 1~ I !II r IIL' II J 11 ® ~ ''F n ( n11~NENl CUPh , 0~ _ n~:~ I ~,I SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 Drawing Title !r,~IF ~ EXISTING SITE 60' RAIN I - En'.F.Nn~ v. 'b /._rU ~ ~ ~ WA(-1~ ~ 4C1~ ' W..O~L s~~ 18°° di~F ~ t~` ~ ' ry a w.r:~J ~E~;. SCALE:1 "=20' T r.~ ,aFIVAr~~ r4.H, ~ i ~ ~lo° .,tl~ & UTILITIES . ' - ~ . I.- . I 1o.i4 Z: .!4._._._. ;I I ~ ~...~~c~nrc~y_r~ PLAN m ~ 1 . I W~ Ex..« -18"0 HOPE 20 0 10 20 40 Drawing Number I ' I _ 22 _ E:!'/S77 r. lr C4Ml J ` _ HT - l 2 CI DEVELOPER PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE 6 PH DP M~ ~ b x l~ I~~ ,I , li ~ ~ll - "w I I ~~j ~ ~ - - - - SYMBOL LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE & LT QUANTITY INSTALATION ~ a ~ ~ ~ I~ o I I, P H 14 HT PS Ilex x attenuate E. PATAKA 10' CLEAR 2 3 LT • HT r. 18 East Palatka HOLLY TREE 2.5 CALIPER ~ PB 61 PB ° PH Phoenix CANARY ISLAND 12' TRUNK W/ DIAMOND l o PH 5 CI 6 67 ° 12 °°°°°°°°°a°°°°°°°°°°° IX 12 SH ~ PF , canariensis DATE PALM LEAF SCAR PATTERN o o ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° o ° 28 1~ „ o~,~~i I LT Sya rus 10' CLEAR °°o°o°o°oao°fl°o°o°fl°o QP g QUEEN PALM 4 ° 10 23 66 r t r}} r r t t r t} } # i# 1 4# i# i## r romanzoffiana 2.5" CALIPER - - - - . i Phoenix 10 CLEAR I ~ o ; ! , DP DATE PALM 12 • i ; • ~ ? i # 4 # dactyllfera 2.5 CALIPER } } i o ~ 15 THICK COVERED W/ ~ rn ° PP Butia capitata PINDO PALM 4 I , , STUBBY ~ P Church of Scientology . N Y Y ~ c QUEEN SAGO ~ OP SH 14 FLB LANDLORD OFFICE 2 52 SP Cy as circinallsj 15 THICK 1 PALM i ° SF PP 319 S. Garden Ave. o LA NP Trach car us v ~ 55 2 PF ~ Clearwater, FL 33756 MP y p WINDMILL PALM 8 10 SLENDER o 5 i 49 4 ~ -1~1 0 fortune) CLEAR TRUNK - i ~ 7 SF tel: 727-467-6583 I tri i 92 ~ HT fax: 727-445-7277 2 flblldesigners~scientology.net Phoenix 1 ' - I~ ~ i~ PR PHOENIX RECLINATA 0 CL 5 8 STEM, SPECIMAN, 2 N # senegalensis 4'X4' ROOTBALL MIN., B&B } TREE FORM OF 10' CT, 5-8 STEM, SPECIMAN, I TA ~ 49 i# LT # NATIVE AZALEA 4X4 ROOTBALL MIN„ B&B i~-- 4 ttr ENGINEER OF RECORD TREE FORM OF 10' CT, 5-8 STEM SPECIMAN TA ~ „ 4 - NATIVEAZALEA 4X4 ROOTBALL MIN. B&B r._._ _ _ HT v o it--- LTFI .....PUMP I 4 Z h m N .r AUSTRALIAN 18 -24 HEIGHT • AF Cyatheaceae TREE FERN 5FT O.C. 7 1•••,~• lL._ _-_.R'IU -YEL 1 - ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ra hiole is 1•'•'•' • ~ Nro n ~ °m ~ z IH p p 18 -24 HEIGHT ' INDIAN HAWTHORNE 2 ; ; , indica 24 O.C. WnC~ w I- IS % ' ~ • 178 „ IH ~ v~Zv N ~ M Asparagus 24 -36 HEIGHT , PF „ 34 31 setaceus PLUMOSA FERN 36 O.C. LLZa $ o~ ~ I o ~ cn Wo m BJ a°w F d a~ 18"-24"HEIGHT LT (Asparagussetaceusl LILY TURF 677 I ~c N~ ~~W NW 24 O.C, I ~ F- ~ ~ Z Z = W SEASONAL 7 GAL., 24 X24 SF 296 Q .Y a2 N~ FLOWER SPREAD, FULL ~ ~ , 7 GAL„ 24 X24 , ~ I~. F a~ = Y Q FLACT BUILD N ~ a ~ ~ ~ = 3 W CO Zamia pumila COONITE ~ ; , • ~ SPREAD, FULL 110 ; 98 ~ ~F~~ ~ z w Philodendron PHILODEND 7 G " PS RON AL„ 36 X36 bi innatifidum 17 p SELLOUM SPREAD, FULL TUY STRUCTURE ' ~ ~ ° ~ w W a u, o, .r „ I Nandina 18 -24 HEIGHT Ju-U~ a Y a \1 ~ fVQ U ~ ND NANDINA 98 - • • . . domestlca 30 O.C, ' ~IT ~NIET ~ ~ Z I I s~ N J W U :~5• ii j ~ . ,"'I ~ ~ ' ; ,•7 ~ r~-~ I I ~ I Date issued: Q7~28~06 . + SH 'Stokes Dwarf' ILEX SCHILLINGS 18 -24 HEIGHT ~ > > ~ ~ ! r ~ ~I ~ 75 ~ ~~!ll ,~111~ ~ I I - HEDGE 36 O.C. % • IM ' ~ I ' ' ~ l 1 ~ - r';i ~ I I LJ I{~, Project Number: Q6•~ Q Ixora ~ ~ ~~ri ~ ~ , ~ ~ 84 t ~ . T~T~~T~ IX IXORA 3 GAL„ 12 HT., FULL 28 1•'• ' coccinea ~ ~ • 1:' 15 Designed by: KR ° ° ° ° Dwarf PS agogogooo PB PLUMBAGO 3 GAL 12" I(ITCH~hI i Nc ~ Revised by: ~ HT., FULL 128 Plumbs o 9 i Drawn by: RR 18 -24 HEIGHT n FC IM IMPATIENTS 84 ' 30 O.C. ~ ''SOLID' WASTE - - - LT III - \v . + RECYCLING 18"-24"HEIGHT % ' ' I `'~(COMpACTOR]~' / ~ Revlslans; 10 ~ ILEX ' ' IS SCHILLINGS 312 • ; , Stokes Dwarf 36 O,C. ' - \ o-- ~ No. Date Description DH . , I ! G ~ 1 07/28/06 DRC SUBMITTAL. I f_...;.,~--~- ~~1 LI - 18"-24"HEIGHT S7 WF Dryopteridacea WOOD FERN 178 - 36" O.C. I ` II ~ 2 09/01/06 CITY COMMENTS G~REABE--- I ~ I LA LATANA ~ 3 GAL.,12 HL, FULL 85 I' TRaP I~ 3 10/02/06 CITY COMMENTS BASEMENT) i I LJ 4 Podoca us 18"-24"HEIGHT WP ~ PODOCARPUS 79 % ~ AF macrophylla 30 O.C. , , ,ryI ~ 5 I =11 II ! 73 18"-24" H EI HT ~ 5 ~ 'ss G ~ Can a JANITOR II = e ~ 6 I CLOSET II SANITARY it ^,r , ~r, i,~ ~ NP NATAL PLUM „ 49 ' ` macrocar a 24 O.C. .B~ . (BASEMENT) I I SUMP I j ~ 7 I I I (BASEMENT) ~ I .r Ilex vomitoria 18 -24 HEIGHT • t:_:~_-_-__ --.ll...----. ....I~--- ~ 8 DH DWARF HOLLY 57 36 o.c. TA nano SP PS Li ustrum 1.•.. 49 LT P L g 30 GAL 1 I " J JAPANESE PRIVET 5 1 11 japonicum 22 14 ~ PRELIMINARY SET I I CO ~ PERMITTING SET - PF , LT LT PP PF PF 47 ~ CONSTRUCTION SET 53 76 10 2 10 7 M LT SF SF 2 22 94 LT LT SEC / TWP / RGE ~ 55 ..a : f, 25 87 16 - 29S -15E 350' 0'( 350.44'(F) , • ° a a° PINELLAS COUNTY I • I A p/Permit No. Ex .Date - - - HT QP P PS F6 FLS2006-04023 NEW CONCRETE D ALK 2 2 14 3 - - • UTILITIES BCP2003-08679 COMPLETED UTILITIES BCP2004-06322 COMPLETED I _ - SWFWMD 44022985.001 UNE 11,0 - - ~ - - T~ HT ~p ~ ~ i ~ ~ i LT i ~ I DP HT CO LT Project Name tt ,i i 3 47 145 6 60' R W 2 16 90 FLAG BUILDING ~ J 1 CROWN SPREAD NOTE; ALL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES ` 2 WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE NOTE: ALL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES GROWING SEASON. WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE CROWN SPREAD sPRFnD NOTE: GROWING SEASON. REFERENCES TO THE PARKING Project Address For Cabbage Palm Installation: Far Cabbage Palms: Trim All Fronds ak Time ~ Remove Dead and Injured NI Trunks to be Smaath and N I GARAGE ARE INCLUDED FOR 215 FT HARRISON AVE. NOTE; ALL TREE STAKES AND ~ REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLYAND ~ Twigs, Trim No Leaders, of Digging and Planting NI Bum Marks Brushed Away g x Retain Natural Shape. For Waehingtori Palm Installation: Far Wash(ngton Palms: R SUPPORT WIRES WILL BE ARE NOT PART OF THE FLEXIBLE Leave inside row of fronds Leave all boots on trunk 3/4" - 2 Ply Reinforced Tie up whh bladegmdoble twine F G cROwric S~E,4ESON~ coMPLETE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT 2 Rubber or Plastic Hose 20 Layers Burlap Pad at = R, o r Support Contact - No ~ Tr White Surveyor's Tagging rn Nails in tree Wood ~ Ri Remove Dead and Injured APPLICATION. CLEARWATER Twigs, Trim Na Leaders, FLORIDA 33755 Retain Natural Shape. Tape, 6 Length a 3/4" - 2 Ply Reinforced o°~o y Wire Tie ~ ~ 3~ 3 - 12 Guage Galvanized Wires p0a c _ ~ Ru Spaced 120 Around Tree and ~ 2" s 4' Brace (Yellow Pine) ° Wf Rubber or Plastic Hose Drawing Title Set At A 45'Angle With 3- # 68 00o Space Three at 120' Typical Ta Duckbill Anchors Or Equal °p° 0 3" Minimum MUICh ~ Remove after one growing season. Whfte S~rveyar's Tagging SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 Tape, 6 Length FLAG CONCRETE CURBING ~ 2" x 4' Stake (Yellow Pine) 3 4' Min. Mound To Form Saucer Three Feet Lan Se 3 - 12 Guage Galvanized Wires ~,;r..,. g Remove after one growing season. ASPHALT PAVEMENT ,,`iti 3" Minimum Mulch Layer 3° Soil Saucer Du Spaced 120 Around Tree an SCALE 1"=20' BUILDING Set At A 45'Angle With 3- ~ 88 Duckbill Anchors Or Equol ~ ~ -T - ~ Ie _ Saucer Rlm Re ROAD BASE ~ Remove Burls From ~ - i~ _ Remove after one growing season. LANDSCAPE 's a -ILA ~ -~=1~ ~ ~ =f ~ I_ I 4 Min. 1- i Around Top of -Ball '11_111-III-III • _ Remove Container - Finish Drade -i _ Mound To form Saucer -III-II~IG" III-IIh' From Root6a - - - III-i 1~' it Mixture i - - 3" Minimum Mulch .w_ii = .r ,iF...,... , -III - 9 - - - ii - W - - - ..w. - ;r - - Min, • ~ • ~ ~ 1- ~ 1= - • ~ •`.f 1 u_ur 3" Minimum Mulch Layer PLAN I 6:'. Min.' . Planting Soil Mixture Rootbail, ts" Minimum ,r~, ~ ~ Remove Burlap Fram I f<1 Radius From Trunk 1 Around Top Of Ball ~J I I I I I I TREE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL F-RL-11 EXt5ttn9 Soil -III- - Wanted-S and Tamped -1 I ~=1I I =III Plaiing Soil Mixture v" Planting Soil Mixture ZO 0 10 20 40 Drawing Number ENT TO OR WITHIN ADJAC.U.A. SHRUB PLA =III-1i ; : : ' Existing Soil NTING DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. Provide a minimum 5'x10' - = - unobstructed planting area ninnum 5'x10' planting area PALM STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL TREE STAKING & PLANTI & PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. 6' BENCH TYP, ( ) TRASH RECEPTACLE PIERCE STREET 0 C~..~ 0 0 0 o . ~~G9~i/i 0 , ~~~~'//%j i BENCH (TYP.} 0 0 0 0 0 i % ~ RAS RASH RECEPTACLE 6' .BENCH (TYF) ASH RECEPTACLE % ~ ~ r-~=---~ AG BUILDING PRECAST CUSTOM COLOR o - FL , ~ N;/ ~i / i • % / /ii~ . r' / ~ ;/,,~~j / ~ / ~ ~ i~,/~~oi. 6 BENCH TYP. , ~ ( ,,,i, ~iiii i~~i/%~~/~ + . T A H RECEPTACLE RS . ORNAMENTAL IRON POTTERY TYP. W 0 a W _ z 11111111111 W W TRASH RECEPTACLE z OF TILE DOLOR FLAG BUILDING RO ORNAMENTAL IRON m.,~.~. TYP. W/ POTTERY ( ) 6 BENCH TYP. , W z o ~ _ w__~_., _ ~ <C ~ - I~Ifflfflllll . , - 3'-1' W ~ ~c~ t~ ~ ~~_1 ~ -S ~U 9, ~ Z o ~ rQrn~ TRASH RECEPTACLE °t` 4'-5•. V :1 I rOnn VJ TYPICAL EXTERIOR BENCH ~ . nr°, fir ~ ~ ~a." i l - ~ , . ~ I f 1I1l1lIIlLllll ~ . , y ~3„ r 6 BENCH TYP. s ~:s~ ` ~ ~ TRASH RECEPTACLE .:1 FLAG BUILDING EXTERIOR PAVING u;1 '~h ~ "'v ~~s i ~ ~ o'~r~a~'- u ~ r A^. ~ FURNISI~INGS " ..';'RCS _ _ _ A a ~ ~ Ij' SCALE: 1/16 =1 -0 .I~ TYPICAL TRASH RECEPTACLE is ~ ~ ~ ,t t - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f,:w , 6' BENCH (TYP.) , a ~1 w_ g~,<~~ad - i ~ r =s. , sw,+,.w rm~m ;t, . a ~ y)F t r r ~ ~ ~ F, i a ~ r ~ ~ ~ I~ 1 i ~ ir:. ~ r~' ~ ; r>~. s i t,. ~i,,~, r' h i, - r j S ,k f _ } i" ~ t~, l ~ ; r I~ r { l,1~ t' G ~ ;u. ~_t,i ~ C ~ . _ r i . .d-~;r ~ . i ~ ~ . s t 3 I f U U U U U U V UuluI ~IIV.) ~i a~f ORIGINAL ECEIVED JUL 28 2006 FF FRANKLIN STREET PLANNING DEPAR-nvix, T TRASH RECEPTACLE CITY OF CLEARVIIATER 240'4" 2`tl'1'"tn I 1 47 9 E i .f ,i~t d ; , 4 r~ , l ' ~1 - - 1 ' REIJGlOUS SYMBOL (TYPICAL, SEE FRONT ENTRY DETA~ SHEET) r ~ id 'sarlll a f r.,; 1111'` 111 AA , 1~1 - G 1 I ~ 11 ~ s 1~ I il~ ~ a . , w , , . r..,,..~_ , ~ __7 5111 111 111 11 ~ j; f i ~11 f n~ d ~ ~n ~ f . ~ } ,~;;II1{I1 idlltfii~l ~f€1~~1~11 I . TERRACOTTA TQE ROOF ~s ~ ai1f~~H~ ~~I~IIIl~~ , r>~~ , ~ < r t,~,. ,fir m 0' ulr' u~ a ~ (sAMPLE PROVIDED! s ~ ~ P"T "FTT ~ R"`r"t E"'f"9 ~ f 1'"7 . f'~3 _ -7 F i _ Im ~ m - ilr 111° m; , AI: llI~ 1 _ , el a u mr °~i m m . _ 1 11 1M ^ ' _ ~ 1~1, 111 01~ ? r 11 ' ' i 1 : 11 1 11 11 ` ~11 ~III 11 ~ II ' 111 IIL' i 1 ~ ,r". ~1~ Ili ~11; r- } . . , ' ~ ~ ~.JI~_~--, _1~1 - r ll~ ~ , 111 x.111 ~ all.. 111 , 111 ~11`_ 4 11 ..111.. ylll - ; ~1~ 1 ~ ; :T 4.,... 4_.. _i _ f ~ ~ F j ,Rm ~ ~ j' ~.-t,.,. rte, I , r °...r ill r i t 0 11 1m?~ r-° .~.I 111 f 11 1_ f 7 ~ 111 € „ ? r-, m1 'm' m ~ ;,.,r m m rn ili,'~ ~ ~ r ; Iri iti ilr ` III ~ ~ ~ ~ 111 ~1 1 ~ 1 i~ i ~ s ~ ~ ~ n.~~~,,,,', ~ , , ~ ' EfiS. COLOR MATCI~D TO r ,r~.,~H,~,,, ,,~r,~~, ,~.r~~! ~,,m~.,,~.,~.,.~. y _v f' 13f NJAMW MOORL 2153.50 DESERT TAN ! 1 ;1 ~M i._. S_ ~ r~ n S p~ ~ ~f~ ~i (AMP OF CORNER ~ ; ~ irl ~ ~ rlr R , ~I= ~ z j-' MM1 ;11 111 , 1 ~ , 1 1 e1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ , e I~ ` , E k~ ~ _l~l liui ~ [idi~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LEPROVID 111 JI 111 - , 11 ~ ~ I~ 11 111 111 ~1 ~11- 1 Il a ~11 111; ~1~ TOUJER _f f IlfirH'1 ~ II11fIi~f ~ ~ ~ ~ hllfilll lilliliil ~ { ~ ~ i ~ ''r°°""" ~ CFJS QUOPIS COLOR MATG~D TO - -----x ~ _ _ _ .k I . ~ _ _ - _ . ~ T - , { E ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ` ~ ~ PRECAST CONCRETE CO ,.r ~ 1 ~ ~ r~ ~ ,rte r, ~ r7 r~ 4Y ~ PRECAST CONCRETE ~ a fill llf ~ ~ a ~ ~ 11 ~ f..~, : ~ ~ { , nj ^ ray z ~ j, ~~f, ~ n~ ~i ~ i , a A f ! 110 ~ . i ~ ~ , ~ E-, 1illFl~~~i~~. ~~~!I~lihi t . ~_r ~ °r= , - s-- ! 11 ~ x , _ _ ? 1~~~~ ~IN~IJ1 Ir~ll D" - i ~t i ~ .r , _ _ _ ; ~ ~ ~ 111 ~ ~ - ~ ¢ ~ 11 , ~ ~ t ~ ~ - ~~ku ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ i.. .k 7 ' ~ -r R~ it +4 r ~ ~ 4 i i ti{ f ? 5 • i ~ E ~id p s~ 1p{ ~ f _ ~1;f 111111"' y. ~ r , ilflflf! { I , _ ~ r { Y Y • , a, ~ r ~ , : ~H1UIN1{1 , 1' ! 1 i r t ~ _ r f _ r t ~ - . , e _ ~ n ~ z ~ ~y', -y-r t 4+~~ + iv 1 EASTELFUATION ~ East Elevation 290'"0" 240'-0" _ - ~ _.m.., ~.n~~_ ._n..~..~.~_.~ m...~ ,__.m , o ~ - _ - L~ ~ - ~_3 r ~ ~ r ji, >I 1, ~ ~ ~r ~ r `_j f' f ~ TOP OF TOWER - EL X0'-0' ~ f. [ ~ t x a 1~,~, ~ ~ ~.~~~'~~k { ~mti`.:a wk. ~ ~m ~I '3 r~Paur or TOWER oo . R f EL 101.4 . , .-.-~-4~ < ~ --~-y-t-,~-Q-b-~ ~ TOP Of CONC. BG1M - FL 99'-0' 5 iy^x---='.-~ ' ~ ~l --k-;:-3-~-,,-m--a--w•-."SFr ' ~ Iv1mPOC~T OF ELEV TOWER ROOF - EL l1b-10" : ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ MIDPOLNF OF TOWER ROOF - EL 14f-4" s oa ~e _ yy Pp d ff - 1 r~ i.....I su i d uii I ' r3 t t. . ;i . r iF ~ a~i.i 1 rfe Y y~' ~..T ~ - CL 14F-4" MIDPOI~i OF TOWER ROOF - EL 107'-4" ' k~:..., 5, k 9rs t , s ~ ~ ~ 1 a , ~ ~ r a: o z { ~ . ~ s=, a r u TOP OF CONC. BEAM - EL 133 a r:a I_ 1_ril r nt ~ k "~f `i~'I~hiiuii~( ~"rii I P~r.;li7 I il,"~ii ll,i~n~~ r~ ~,r i ;lii I ~ foul ~~il~~,pp~~ ilui~ri, i~i111, IL... ~ E~i[~~'. a rt a ~ - ~ ~ ~ "'N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b.l L"~, Q ~i1 1.. 4 5G~ ~.._a a ~VEI. L 133'-0" ~ ~ ,.m~..,~,."~, r~ i ~ ~-.,,..-,-.,,--,:^,y^..-"."'~.;,~„-v~r.r-.-r-ems.-•~--.-T--,.--h~-~, ^Y~".*e"7^h~..':?~"k ~ , . ! - i~ q ~ ` _ ~ TOP OF CONC. BEAM • El. 99'-0" M . ~ _:r r. d , w , n o ~ II ? nl In Yll lll:.:.ir'. ¦ fh 1 ~ In nl ' ;n rn ~ UI nL '.111 u~ ' .a ..en el Kati e~ iu ~ i11~ 91i '9 i~ ~a E~; ~I Y~ : '9 i8' ;A I~t 'I' "1 ~ In LEVEL7 e , e I a n r ~ u a ; u n 3,FH , I _ _ . ~ ~ LEVEL b t .c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .J'j''~ ~ i .t. a i ~ 1 ~ _ ~ _ °i FL 12.0 EL 120'-8 ma ~ i i . I - C Y EL 86'-8" 9 ~ 1_. r 11 , m rn ';,111 11 ~ 1. , lil 11 ul I ~ ~ , a~ i~ E ii~ r . ~ 1 1 _ la m I~t t I 'u0 m 1 1 cu , on to r (d.~,.:., 111- w 1 r nl- r D u m- w W ,.td'f... t .iv; , _ ; ~ xm , ~ , fra, ~ : t, , _ _ lll~tY ~i~s ~fi~k~l~t IEVEL 5 LEVEE b ;,1+~ ~ ~ ~r EI. 58''0" E1.. 10b~ f5 ' .r I l y , , , ~av f = , 1t 1 ,,i~~ '~~1 ~9..~' . ~ . ~ ~ - - ~r' ~ ' EL 12.0 1 ~ ~;`e:. a 1 ff~ ,~,„,,,,,,.,r~ r'~ a LEVEL LEVELS 4 . EL 44'-0" CL 84'-0" ~ ~ `LEVEL 5 - y r 3". ~ a b ul s z-h, ~ i LEVEL 4 f " EL 58'•0" ~ - FL 78'-0" E _ ~ ~ : i,~o~~i 1,1 i.~l ~ R,,. ~ i!,~,~~~~n ii1 ~ - - ~ ~ iii iti ~ ?LEVEL 4 ~ ~ ...r,~ - r_: ~ ~ . El, 44'-0" LEVEL 3 6 F ~ ~ ~ . z y ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ^'-'_F ..u+ i ~ tirl ~ ~ i! i x i + to i ~ i {11i1n Ifi lI ItJ11h 7 i ~ - ~ LEVEL 3 b ~ ELb3^0 ~ i, .I ~~i ~ ill i~ Li ti I g r: ~ i' ~ l o j. LEVEL i 2 j t ~ ~ w.. _ r. ~ 1 1 i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ LEVEL 2 r ~ ~ ~ ~ A a ~ .d ( , ~ FL 15'^0° 3s '0 } -nC ~ ~r[~y T +t r` qr t MABV FLOOR LEVEL I ~ t s ~ b } ,r r re i s i' 2 ~ ' ~ ? i [L 34'~"ABOVE SEA LEVEL ,5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ik ~ ~;'Jllitl(IIIIIIl~~ ~ Mt1Pl FLOUR LEVEL (WEST SIDE SIDEWALK - EL +/-30'-0" +1.30'"0") ~ ~ s, ~ } ~ ~ , ~ `-3 41 fL 0,•0, ? j -it ~ , m._x . , i SOUTH ELEVATION k RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2006 P NNOF DEEARWA R _ PIERCE .STREET 350 00' ~ .I. C . --EAST 140' , I , X70' ' : I : 70' I 70' • car ~ ~ I I I o 0. ~ I I I I ~ , ~I _ 140.'.. J.^ I. I p BASIS Of BEARINCS~ - - - - - - - ~ . h ~ I h l . ~ Z _ I Bearings shown hereon are based upon the O' . t~ ~ LOT 11 N .LOT 90 N LOT 9 N East right of way l/ne of Fort Narrlson Ave. N J I ^ . ~ ^ I ^ i' 0'~ 9'~ h LOT 2 h l I I W as bearing N.OOt?0'00"E(assumad), sll• ~ I I + i ry° Son MH j'J ,o ~o' . ~ w Q •140'------I I I. TMH ( , o _ ~ ~o - e oo I I I oQ I I y ~ ~ h LOT 3 Ni_ _7D i -70__ i 70~_ h ~ I h W-------,~-~-- W W o .y0' ~ 1y 79 I i _ ry9 I p 9~ r....~, -^h--~ti,,,,.__.. rh a ~I ~ Z N .140' I i ~ N ° I _ ~"Dve e d +rya i o• Power llne y1 C I I 1 ~ 1, o s i q9 ~ ® I 1ry ...,_.iry.._._..__..,. Lono 0 I, i I I I o ~o zo 4D o~ , ~ry l o Landscope ,Line ry :::.r 9 ::a:r. • ~ Son MH y4 0~ ~ ~ LOT 4' h I in, b I ~ I ~ I EMH 4 0 :.go• I. ; y N' ~ rye. ; ; + I N LOT '6 N ~ LOT 7 . N I LOT 8' N 1 by P• ~ ~ ryg. ary ry ry a a , m! j ~oti ..140 ^I I I. 96 ryo• 'E. 0 ~ 1' COnc• Curb I Sfop Bor r I +ry ~ E o , I ~ , I i;'i~iii2;;;.•r::::. ~o EMN ry• f ,,1 g 1~ - ~ I I i ~ y ~ °e fMN I I E 1 e y 1• ~ I 1 y ,L t w I Cona ry I ..,........•......j^,:•:::.;•:::.;~`:: ~'~•::•:::.^..^.•h... • 91 ry 9 "l.:a:::.r:::..r: ~ ; "j ........447.C•''::• Cana. Drive y 0 ~ 0• I 1 Pad I ~F+ ......,.~.~AY:?ii.'•": ~i~:i•;ii: 1 y ~ ga 1~ q'~ ~0 1• ti i ry9 i 'EMH ~ 12 yy rya, Conc. DriKv 1~ F ry~ ~I '1}~I''Son MH ~5 . ~ LQT 5: h l I I' ~ ry~0 pl 1 I I I ! 3 ~ ~ o"P ryy Elechlo ~ 09"Tree ryo• ,LO yry Tele hone ry ~ ~15 Rolm o' ~ tio' 1 Cona P i I I a I ry Voult y + Pad Box + ~ ry60 b elephone ~ ~ N 140' I 70' I ~ 7D' 7D' b,< + I i Sanitary Sewer Data::. ry0' I I I 0 6 i ~ ~ y,D i r 12 ADS 1`0 Sfm MH x'12 yy. ry1 12" ADS ti~~~ ~ Stm MH /+11 1 8 RCP ~ 48" RCP Sot MH 1y1 ' F•l.R•5 B . ry' 1• 12" ADS (I ~ N.895617E -~'-350.00 P .350,50 F_._._-_3_ -----~----al.- - + - ~ 'i ~ ( Rim= 30.21 350 ~Q' . I y,0 1• ' ~ ( ~ ~:~tl;.';j`; i rya o,~a ~y+ Conc. yry o~ ,a "+ry' ,LO+ ' stR ! Q ti~ 1nv.S= 2669 FRANKLIN • STREET ^i ; ~°I~ I,+ryo•~ lnvN.=26.97 E o`' i o10 i''9iiii:;:ji:; ?ol ryo p a h~ p Masonry 1g• ^ h1 y+ b ( + ^ o ^ Columns + ry titi i Landscape I , ~ . ~ t ; h' ~tiy I Areo I i ~ I E. I ! San. MH ~'2 • ( I ,L9. M1O T ICOI ryq i I o• I , . ti ~ 131' ,I; 6 I ~ Rim= 30.39 DESCRIPTION. DIAGRAM • I 41, 41.9' 7 1 I I. ^ t ^ i h a p I I W i 1•T lnuS- 26..74. o I Son M11,vs inuN.= Z6.75~ Note' 'All dimensions ,shown on this diagram. I I I I i 'S h ~I + I ~ is w, ~ ; are taken 'from the record plat. - I v I i3.8'. • 158.3' I , • oI ~ a ~ i ~ Sanrtary MH ~'3 ' Rrm= 30;92 F w ~ YnvS=26.75 I • ' I c H ~ ~ I h I ~ 1nuN= 2670.. I Inv.VY.= 26.85 I I 1, ~ I , Pr , i ~ ( 9.5' I 1 ~ ' 1 ~ ~ I i oQ I I c 6 • ( i 3l' I fah :0~` aj~' • N boa Sanitary MH X14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: p +ry1oo 69~ , .1y0, +ryb+rye• Rim= 27,20 _ I I o ! i 7 I ~ I i I in~N.= 2205 I ^ ~ ~ invs= 2206 Lots 1, 2; 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 8, 9,10 and 11, GEORGE WASHBURN SUBDIVISION, according to the I I I ; , 4 I ~ ~ sanJtary MH ,~s map or plat thereof as recorded in PIaC Book 5; Page 23 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, I I ~ ' I i I I - I ~ I RJm= .26.66 Florida. / I ' I, I 1nvN= 21.94 ~ i YnvS.= 19.14 ~ o; 10.2' I I `01 I 10.2'.. 13.1' I II . _~I !I _ _ I ..10.2... ~I I T i. Sanitary MH ~6 I Rim 26.26 t B n-o I I I Inv.N.= -19.47 E a~. ! 1 ~,y ory y i ,yo I i op, :igF:•i'r'risiiE'•E: ~o I I t ± 1'~ t , ro o- . I Overhead ; . ~ 'm`,:~i.••. y 1 y~ I :.d~•:^::::::::::. Mosonr I I Columns I 8~ I I .I ~ SonitaryMH,~7 _ i RJm= 26.57 'SYMBOLS LEGEND, ABBREV1Ai70NS' Wolkway i i i (T}pkol) - ~ 10.2' ~ I I y° II ~ lnvS= 2228 • I • I ¢ I " ;I I ~ oo° fGR _ ,Found Iron Rod t _ Sanitary MH ~'8 o 46.4' i.. 6y0 i ry I I I I , ti6`'° tib"1 I" I it i e nrN?z2o2 + = Spof Elevation S~ ~ ~ Sldew.a/kp@dJron Rod LB 043 I • I 1 Cona n~0 1 ~ y . ..1 I Conc ay r I `I I . ; Inv.S= 21.87 ~ ~ Oak Tr66 6 r.P Q I I c ;I I Conc. _ .Concrete I I ~ ,~9 y ; ~ ; f ~ Sanitary.MH ,~9 x =Power Pole TP. _ Trons/o/mer Pad I i 3 r ~ , I I ; ~ I ' y I ~I ~ I i RJm= 26.47 a ~ Clean-out Inv, ~ Invert Ele~ntlon eP o I v ° .I I lnv.N.= 21.34 I ..~iiJggL:ri , II y~ N I :::fJ:r'r 1 t ry I y4 . r ry6' ,yob 4 ~ !nvS= 21.24 h = Traf/Ic Slgn Stm MH = Storm Manhole . Z i II Conc. I I I conc. brye I I ;I ~ Sonitar MH 1o San, MH ~ Sanitary. Manhole ti r•P I I ;I ` R;m= 2zoo ~ ® ~ Water Valve ADS =Advanced Drainage System (pipet ` 3 ~ I } c i ' I I I I ' w ~ InvN•-.20.22. ~ =fire Hydrant RCP ~ Reln~orced Concrete P/ e • I I r I I 'I I In~W.= 18.42 p r i~'r,!tiii~i , i I I 1~ { Landscope , ryy.. I ~o I oo II 1ti 90~ 0~ v 1nu,SE.= 1x.41 ® _ .Water Meter VCP . Vitrified Clay PJpe ~ " 1 6 ~ Ipry~ y~ ~ -f Burled Electric Cable EMH Eleefrle Manho/e I I :::.y;: Area + I I ~,p ry hry I ~ fl +ry ~'ry ~ Sanitary MH ,~11 '1 ~ ~ RJm= 2a•4o TMH = .Telephone Manhole lyo• ,Lp• . 99 ~Y;i:};;,.....• 0• ry9` i \ Y A yti ~ - i ~ I ~ ~ Jnv.E.= 19.82 _ Burled Water. Main • W Yard Dialn , . e::.e::.~::•e:. . I T ary , \ ~f+ /1y i . :e::ars::::::. _ 9• ~ ~ ~ ry0' ' a a I ~ y iI ~ I Sanitary MH ,¢12 •_"G"'"_' _ Bulled GaB Moln Y,D.. I I i L ~ Rrm 26.16 _ .r:::::::,; , ~r , tp ~ ~ 1nvNw 1811 - ! ' I °6 1~6° I:'-`: M~£.= 17.93 _ _ _ _ _ I ~I I . _ . ven S or Mdsonr Buildin Se t y Y 9 a ~ i - Inv S= f8.09 ~ rv I ~ ~ - A Io I ~ I i Q I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ F:F. Elev.= 33.96 ~ to ~ i I~ ~ ~ Main Ground Floor I ~ . I I W - SURVEYOR'S NOTES: . I N I o I I d Storm: Sewer Dofd: l ~ v 3 : o:.,:. 1~. c . • . b' ary kry I ~ a 1 bry ~ 1. Unless otherwise noted orahown hereon, no underground. foundations,. I ~ ^ I ii.•s.....• Tiee Anchor ' +"6• I tib' W I +ry~•t~~ ~ry+ Stm MH yr structures, installations; utilities or an other otential under round + + I I \ RIm= 30.06 Y P g U Me1ol Coble :;~~:~?i; I a (Tyyicol) ' I:3 ~y' lyary - ~ ~ InvE.= 25:06 encroachments have .been located• as a part of this. survey ' I I ...W._.f~• I . Stm MH~2 I h~ ~I I Rim= 29.03 2, This survey was prepared for the exclusive use and benefit of those ory~ p Q I i Inv.W.= 24.31 I 1 1 ' Opry lip.. Iry9 •A.....~~..:.::° 9 . +'I~. ry`? i' IA I I,I r,,• Jn~f= 24.52. persons or entities specifically named :hereon and no others,-.This ( 7 1 _ I ~ I I 1 stm MH ~3 map, unless it bears. the signature and original raised seal of ~ a y p+ I ( 1°~ ly I~ Rrm 2~s7 Fiorlda Ucensed Surveyor and. Mapper, is not valid and is not Jnv w= 23as intended to be viewed for informational purposes only, I I Iro ° I ~ , 7nv.E.= 2388 ~ 11 j ' ~ ~ ° ~ I ~ stm MH ~4 ~ 3. This survey is-not intended. to note, depict or delineate any regulatory I e ! ( RJm= 27.54 I IZ ~ I tiayti° InvW= 2354. ' body, bureau or agency jurisdiction or boundary lines, unless they are I.C i'~? --oo i~ I ~ I , /nv.S= 2348 specifically shown or noted hereon. I ) ~ 6~ I bo . lnv.N•= 23, 49 i I N I ~ L ~ I ~ I 1 .c I a I , ~ h I I +ry StmMN~'5 4. Attention is directed to the fact that the scale of the survey may 3 EMN I / u I ~ , , c~ ' I Rrm= 2zs4 have. been -altered during : or after. processing, This should be #aken p; ~I ~ ~ r , ~ . 3s" ~ • I ( I /nyS=2346 into consideration when obtaining: scaled..data; ~ . I lnvN.= 2f.33 ~ I 0 ; f I I ~ ~ I I ~ I. w I S1m MH ,~'6 I e .Rim= 27.93 ' S: Elevations shown hereon refer to •NGVD-29 Datum. ! I ~ i Landscape I ' I I Areo i ~~';~:~ii'ri , +ry~'6 13 J' l y o I InvS.= 20.80 n » ry°ry I m~nr.= 235a ~ Reference Benchmark::Pinellas County Benchmark HARRIS L , i 9°j sry. I ay 1•~4 p~ 'Lay I I , ;~a;; ~a, 1 ~ 2 rL9• rygry 9 I I ' .rya "yo~ t + + I fD I o0 io.2 ry~• ( I Published Elevation 28.005 feet, I I Stm MH ~7 t t 9~ I 51.6 ~ , ry I 5.O + a Rim= 26.34 - . . ~ I lnvW.= 14.54 I I ~ 6 I ln~~:= 14.87 6. This survey was prepared.:without the benefit :of a currenttitle search: a ig I ~ I In~NW=,21•x1_... No. instruments of record were furnished to the .undersigned: , I ° ° Inu•N.= 16.04 _ , ;;~t: ~ , I~ a o- ~ ~ : I stm MH,~B ~ _ 7, Thie arcel contains 92 640 s N d". I RJm= 2s 10 P , guars feet or 2,13 acres, more or less, ~ . , r I /nvS= 16.42 ~ i; I /nvN.= 1664 8. WilsonMiller, inc, accepts no responsibility:for the identification of the s v r-~ 158.3 y Ig ; l ~ I srm MH ~9 tree species ,shown.- hereon.. Every .effort: has been made to :properly .I t ry9• r , 51.6. a 1^,~ ° I - Riin= 2s ro identif trees shown hereon; however tree identification is outside of ^ • a i y ~ a + I 41 0'. i ti ry + I a ° 1nv.S= 19.28 • Y. 1.B 41, h 8 y e 4 1 • + 1 y . ~ I londsc0 e I y y Area to bN ~ I y to Masonry y9+ f1,6' r3a' r l ~ y6a ) yap Inv.E.= 14.42 the area of expertise `of a Professional Surveyor and ,Mapper,. The tree: ry6v h ti o `I ti Inv.N.-.15.98 9+ ry6. lnu.W= 14.39 types shown pre-for informational. purposes, only and should only be I I ? yo 1%, LanLsca e ^ I o1 ;,9 K Columns by o`' YD. Slm MH ,~J ~ ry6~ ~ i 9;~h:~;~j< q P 19 YD• (r,~lcol) ~ 1 "ADS a 0 "A y " ry6~~=a *ti'srm 1~ I Jn~sw= 22ee used after confirmation. by a Certified, Arborist. or other. such. professional. 5 ADS 6.. MH ,~,4 ( y1 ery +ro 1 o; I ADS o; Stm MH y2 ~ - - ~yo ! l o~ ry • l5 DS try F•LR5/8" StmMH{7^;0-'ir'-_.__.-. - _ ~ . I ~o Stm r11H ,~10 - ro Rim= 26.20 ,ry I y N.895510 W, 35000 rP . 350.44 f r~ s" VCP yy+ ~ SI•R• I . !nvNE= 2302 ' •..n 9 6 1 ~ '~"ii61:4rCKii}i"iiii"i}.~,. a~ I•!: + I 'ryq 1 • y Son MH 1! ' y a y h r" I •:::•:a$.... k :~:~:•~gs; ryq +ry9 9ya I { ; I . + ry+ +ti li I 0 p1• pb ryp• ryb' I bye ,.-..-.qy%-••_• i' \ I ti' i Landscape Curb I Stm MH 1y11 . I i;~i~l1•ii. ^ ~p..,..._- t C 1~---....... D t h g + ry EIBCfrk a1 I I tik. : 0 ~ +tiOgM yy0 yy 01 ~0`' G G ryy1 VOUII ryy~9 a i Areo 191st I y.I~ RJm= 27.25 : PREPARED :FOR: C of S Religious ?rust iaWf 6 a ~ h ~ lnv.S = 26 07 ti,V~ I I ti \ o . q ( lnv.W = 26.11. O I ryo• a ry ' c)` o - 0 2 Cona Curb 1. o y P o'r k! n ~a p 6 d. ~ I ~ 6,. ,a . P ar k l n g ryy' ~ ~ ry1• 'L1. ry 1y A o r k l n g h6. ryb. 1p g ryy. p• ry ry ~ ...--~ry ti ti ~ N~, ~ ~ Son MH p/1 Stm MH ,~12 ~ I Rrm= 2a•o4 Phis survey. is not valid without the signature and original TMN i 0 ~ I i , p` E 1~Y~'---- F 1;V E I 41 o• E ry ry EMH 1 y £My 1z' vcP' 1nv,W.= za:14 raised seal of a ,Florida licensed curve or and a ~ I I lnvw.= 24.40 ~ m_ PPer. u j ry y ry ry ;,dry. ' ._.1._.___._.._._.....__ 11 I p ry9. ry9• ry +ry +ry . 0 ,..f-....~....._..__....__._.._....__, • ~ryo~ I`~•` + Cane Llne~ r4 o+f ~ 48_llcp I +ryory _ Stm MN ,~13 ®RIGINAL ; 6' - - RJm= 2931 RECEIVED WILSON MIL , ti l - -r "36 'RCP InvE.= 24.52 ~ , . ~ - - Stm' MH y7 . ~ I~ J~1L 28 2006. ~ EMN 0 EMH _ inv.= Ia t~ Ina= 2,~or,J I PLANNING DEPARTMENT J CITY OFCLEARWATER E, SEMPLE, P.L,S~" b- Z: • ~ Florida ,Surveyor and Mapper' No.' 5489 ~U V In ocvx ocvtcmnl DATE INIT./EMP# ACTIVITY INITIALS/f MP. N0. DATE _ ~ ~ r~~/ INuliarMra~r d ~ ~n CLIEI u'r~~ai~ ~ Ci_IENT:. DATEo TiTI 0420-06 DATE INIT./EMP# PARTY CHIEF: D.F. PC/NO DATE REV# REVISION C`OF.~S~RELIGIOUS..TRUST HORIZONTAL SCALE: BOUNDARY-TOPOGRAPHIC. DATE INIT./EMP# DRAWN BY: J.G.C. DRWN/NO DATE I REV# REVISION V=20' AND-TREE-LOCATION SURVEY INDEXNUMBER: O DATE INIT?EMP# CHECKED BY: S.E.S. DESGN/NO DATE Pleven fthom • Ec:okote • &Nwycra • Lendoc" ArcMocta •TrarwyDOrtatiob Corv"te V# REVISION. PROS W RE PROJECT: VERTICAL SCALE: ATE INIT,/EMP# F.B. PINELLAS, PG.7 FBOOK/PGS DATE. KrdsonkW,~ Inc, REV# REVISION D NalDlee•Forlbryera•SaCaeota•6radenfon•Tampa~Talahaaeee ",A SEC: TWP; RGE: CROSS REFERENCE FILE NO.., PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET"NUMBER: CHURCH_OF_SCIENTOLOGY NSA QREV NO. REVISION DATE DRAWN BY / EMP. NO. CHECKED BY / EMP. 40.. WM APPROVED BYi 1101 awr*" DM*,, Me 400N • %wiM Pal& 33M Now 813-223-M • Far8ki•--2230009 • Web-&o; www misaam -com 4 W:cam 16 29 is CROSS . 05573 1 OF 1 f J c. - aJ - - t FRANKLIN' STREET ~r ~ W 75' 15' 75.5' : 413'. Q 5 -EAST 30 30- ~ LOT 6 ° .LOT . f . o ~ ~ 75'~ ~ LoT 7 coT z a UNNUMBERED BLOCK --75; - 1,~ Sanltar Sewer Data.' SYMBOLS LEGEND; ABBREVIATJONS' Storm Sewer Dato: y J ~ O M oa F.l R, =found Iron Rod Stm MH ,yi Stm MH ,ys son. MH ~'1 W ° LOT 8 e LOT 3 S.LR• _ .Set Ca ed Iron Rod L8 043 Rim= 26.73 Rim= 26.70 Rim= 24.81 J j ~4 = Spot Elewt/on pp Inu.N,=23.02 InuN= 16.55 Inv.S.= 17.53 F.IP. Fo1md Iron Plpe lnt-E= 20,63. InvS= 19.35 75' Ci 2 Q _ Oak Tree unless titherwlse rioted F.N.D• ~ Found. Nall ~ Olsk son_MH ,y2 Stm MH #2 . Stm MH ~'7 Rim- 26.98 Q • d°• LOT 9 LoT 4 Q Q p =Palm Tree . NGS ~ No Comer Set.: _ . _ Inv.N.= i7.a7 ~I Rim- 26.32 Rim 26.79 1nv,S= 17.47 Z ~ ~ ALLEY ~ Q _ S = S/deWalk !nvW.= 20,73. InuN,= 19.91 V ~ Power Pole . ~ Inv S.= 20.68 - --.-75,--- ~ y ' . U1 Conc. _ Concrete Inv,N- 19.92 Sanitary MN rya lA = Telephone. Pale - f er Pad Stm MH ~3 Sfm MH 8 Rim= 26.90 T•P. - Trans arm Rim= 26.23 InuN.= 18.05 Q W I I I I I I I' Q # _ L1ghf.Pa/e Inv. =Invert Elevaf/on Rlm= 26.96 Inu.W.= 18.06 Lor ro Lor 5 o I I I I I 1 i W Inv.N=.20.72 InvN= 20,66 e---• = CuyAnchor Stm MN = Storm .Manhole Inv,E= 20.60 lnu.SE.= 20.67 Sanitary MN ~'4 _ Rim= 26.52 0 15 30 60 0 .Monitor Well Son. MH= Sanitary Manhole Stm MH,f4 1 Invf.= 18.J1 ALLEY L I B L to C KI 1 2 I I I G , ~1 ' TrafAc Sin PVC Polyvlny! Chloride (Pipe) Rim= 2695 To = 2s,s5 p g lnv.W= 20.95 p T I I I I I I I BASIS OF BEAR/NGS. ® Water Valvs C.l. _ 'Grate' Inlet InvS= 20.05 Inv,N,= i9,s7 I I I ~ i ~ I ( I ~ I ~ I. o i I I I ~ -i ~ I h. i ~ I ~ I ~ L ~ I. ~ . Bearln s show hereon are bored u on the ~l. CJrb`lnlef 1nv.S= 20.04 g n p t7 =Fire Hydrant I~ ^ I~ ~ I.~ ~ o i o ~ o I a I o I a I o I o East N t of wa line of Garden Avenue EMH =Electric Manhole stm MH #5 c.l 2 gh , y , . " `Rim= 26. i6 ~ ® ~ Water Meter = GgS'Valtre ' 1nv.S= 16.96. rap= 28,66 as bearlnq.N•00~7813 W GV ro o I~ o I °0 o I °0 0 I i I I I f I'. _ Park/n Meter fnvru= is 71 Ground Light PM g. Mv.E 19.66 V I J I ~ I 30 30' I I I I I I I _ BfP =Back-Bow Preventer E Burled Electric Coble Mag. _ Magnolia 35' 35' ' 35' 35 88.7 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 •-w=- ~ Burled Wafer Moln -c- Burled Cas Mali1 COURT STREET DESCRIPTION" DIAGRAM Note: All dimensions shown on this. diagram ore taken "from the record plat." _ + Inu- -23.12 p p ry1 + 1 + ry^~p~ 1 1 . + ~ U Asphalt Pol~ment . - ~ ~ I _ ~ - 4~ San MH yy y0 . ~ ryo ,,0 - y1 - ~ 6 San MN O ~ ~ . ry ~ t,1 Son MHo 1• ry1 y? y, y y. 1 a 4 ery a° 6~ y1 rya +ry + +ry +ry _ +N +1y +N ~ ry6 ry°' ryy' ryy . _ ~ Stm MN + + + I + +ryy +ry6• Sa son M ~ +ryb~ iti61k....... , f"p~° ( LEGAL DESCRIPTION; Stm MH~ Q Stm MN ~5 ki I, 1 Q 1 ~ 1 Stm 'h 1 Stm MN N a ry Py rya ryy y ¢1 h, ~ y 0'` 6 ~ O 6a ry v~ 0.. 0'S MN ~1 0 `16b ryye 61 ry6• ryb•y ry6• rybry ryy.,ry 9ti ryy'! C.1. ~ ry~ 'Ya1~. y'~ 2~ Cana. Curb y' 0y1 Lots 1 through 14; AND all of Block 12; AND the Unnumbered Block lying North of Block 12, •East ° ry ti ry ryy ~ , ry y . ~ 6' - 0 ry ~ + 6 "s::.4..,.iri~i•%i~~~ri,.'ri4::sii^iiiiiii~iiii;ri:^iiivYi:: ry ~ ~ y 1 ::::::::::ar ° t ~n ,,fi~rr ry ~ „ : 6 ~ ryy~~ ry°9ry~ i1ry66° py9 p^ of A,C.L. Railroad, South of: Franklin Street and West of East Avenue, COURT SQUARE, °";;~oa~~';.%;'~ ~ , according to the map or plat thereof,. as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 52, Publ(c Records of Sfm MN 2 6 1 1 6 Dlrf 6 ry 0 M1 ry 'riN • y 00 I ~......,.,..+::r::••::: yry 'F Or ry ~ , ....,............,,Or.,rk~:::... ...G;;:; G I , G y, ~ ~ ~9 rl ry a a M p° ry6' fa~ o ^6 ep I ^ Pinellas (r0unty, Florida, "'ri~::~' • • ry C' 5tm MN ~ 5" o G +ry . C a G G tie 6• :?ip' 1 Y ry +ry6. ry6+. ryy ry ryy .'''~'titi~sti~i'4'i;tii":i's:,:F. G~ ~ J M I ry+ ~~ry°' _ :t~F~:: 12"Tree •J C s 1R S 8934 59 E 41,E ti5 ° ry t6^ ry~.r G ~4- C RailroodJ G + 0 y6 `'"}:~i R, N 752' N N S ~ . J Jr I SIR. ~ay~~ S1R, . a ~a + Xing Arm SLR " 1;~':~;:~;:• 0.4' a o ro S.895926 E 74,76 ry6• Te%phone ryy' 61`^ ~I ryyy01• + ry iEw^ Moult + ry 0 h 0.3' _~..r ry6 + " tale hone fit.:. (9.. .r c ~ y. Stm . + I ,ye ~ - - 6 y6 18 PVC 6• ro y - - ~ eiri:~.•lr:; Stm 16 ° oy ryy' ti°' y0ry My'~4 ~hh6 l ry yry ' I Ar:.°. MN rya y 6• ry 1• ry ryy y6 h y6ry t~... } y+ ..........._ryry ~ 1 ~ + t 18" .•!ft ~ . N N ~ ' 1o ry1 a 1~~P I0. ;yry.. .One Stor 6• 6• ro ~ (F ~ 6• h y h ry I I N Masonry Building 1by1 +ry " i - - - y 0 I ti • y 1 y + ry V _ 6• 1 - ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ .h 6 +ry6' ~ Q1` 0.~ ' Son MH d2 + h~' y ry6 yro 110 + yh ry6• I ~ ry6• to a pry +h i::ii•?S I i!?n. sI ~ ryy. + 1y tree ~ y9 I 1 i • 75.2' 3 e i 0. i +h°' , y 16 74:9' m +ry1 ~ ,•"~oy I~ I } ~ 1~ I :r::•:a::;::::crs ~ ~ iY ~ I 1 ry1ry w• i• i.............~ I ry' r~' I i &:i:ti:i^ciiii:$i'rid , 1~ ~ I I ~y , ~ ~ I I ry1~ ' C q I ( , o ~ of N ' ~ ~ . I ~ I +ry ~:::;~:;t;1~~,;'/pA,}~, one story ~o Qf r,W. ~ o ` ~ I i r ~ra" ~ SURVEYOR'S NOTES; •ir'ii:• •:y•a~'. w Masonry Building ro ° H ....._o...... ~ I I p:..•••.;.x•:" c;~i? ~ ryy ~ by b1 ry h I I ° h0 ip :?~~:i:fii:{i..;~:• n. +ry ry6• I I + ryy' ry1 • j 1. Unless otherwise noted or shown hereon, no underground foundations, 0 v ,..fol.......... + + + •:YL~:' a 1 ry 4 1• u ~ 1• a1 O 14"COs' ry^~y s``~~:: ~ ~ ^ i , structures, installations;. utilities or any other potential underground + ry^• I ry encroachments :have been located as a part of this survey ~ ry I I~ I r..1 ~ ~ I ~ . ii:~iii'~1w:~r 1y ~lQ~~ ~°C ry1 , +'0 I + ry ~ 4 1~ ry6 4 I I ~ ' ~ 2, This survey was prepared for-the exclusiveuse and benefit of those yry "^~SYiii2...,; A ~ \ y6 I + 026 E ,ry1• '):s::^;:•:;;: yry A 'Q^i ° ry1~ I~ + 6 ~ •r 1. 74.9 a•7 ry I a y W $ !w yC I u I + 28'&24" ?1 ~e ra"pp pp iz° ~ ~ ~ persons. or entities specifically .named hereon and no others. This 0 1 ~ V . `V.. I I 1 ry1 ~ map, unless it bears the signature cnd original raised seal of a ~ - i''??f.,..: ry ~ ~ Q ~ y 69 6 I - rya • I o o W ~ , Florida .Licensed Surveyor and Mapper, is"not valid and is not h ~.i::~.Fi:~i +ry1' ry1h ryy' 06 M1.... ~ I+ry1 ~ + ~ b I ~ ` 1 I , ~ ry ) a; , ~ intended to be viewed for informational purposes only. a 6 qI. I ~ 6~0 6 91 1ph 11 60 c ~ I 1~ 3: a 6° ryy'y ry ry I row I i i +ti 18" I ~ 4 6 17" ~h ~ ~ 3: -This survey is not intended to note, depict or delineate -any regulatory ~ ~ body, bureau or ,agency"Jurisdiction or boundary lines, .unless they are 1 o ~ 17` • ~16" y+ +ory ~ 1ary 1~ I " i 1 "Tree /6" v. ; h . .2i,~LT6:•:. y. y 10 1 1. 18 14 &13 14 6 J9 • ::•'~'B'IX~~ isi• 0 0 641h ao y~ 1'y . ry +ry ~ ~ ry1• 18" • u ry1• ry 6• 15" f2" 20"~ ~ • O O18 . Jg" Tree ~ 16" • 0 p0~~ ~ ` specificali shown or noted hereon, ` a ~ y Ll . ry r.1R. SLR ~ p`4 ~ . . y ry:•::.:::..:: os' s' ry srm Mx cl ry6 , ry' 6~ cl ry I I , N.897517 W. 426.37 1?"Mo . . ° Cooler' Trailer I I i g : ~ i~'•Sii•:r:. y Found ~ ry^"~ '~:":?~1 ~ 4, Attention is directed to the fact that the scale of the survey may - h` o PM Masonry Column P PK Nor! I 96 I' ~ have been altered during oc after processing. This should be taken .ry1 : h r! k ' (TypicoQ i r N I. + S•89~517 E. _ + y B c h One Stor h ryy I I I i + 42758 1~ 6~ 69Wa/k' d y tl W ~ ly,~ . into consideration when obtaining scaled data, s1.R .r'..:. ti I ' ry ryy' v Masonry t3uilding Cooler Tra!!er i 1y h • Electric ? ~ ` Moult ry 60 . b. 1 -ory sa 0,7 0T ~ ry1• NI I I I ;.~+ry relephane~.l l ! l 5. Elevations shown hereon refer to NGVD-29 Datum. 8 Mo9• NCS 76.1' NCS yy F.N.D, ry O . yo " I ry ''°~'r LL11 '~i~??~' ~ I i Reference Benchmark; Pinellas. County Benchmark "HARRIS. L", ~ ~ Published Elevation = 28;005 feet.. 1 6 ~ ,1 y` 58939'30"W. 59.19'Flp 16ro " _ I I f tiMH ia, :.!y;.: I Stm MH T Top of Bank ry1. 1 4'D 1• 00 O W 61 ry yry ~ ry1' -•a c~ Asphalt Pavement ry 6 fMH ry1• San MN ry~ ' 7" ry1'. ~ ~ ry1' Glean-out 1 i fi, This surve was re aced without the benefit of a current title. search. •6..... ry1 ry ~ Stm Mh' y'~ 1, I 2 g"0 ~ I ^ No instruments of record were furnished to 'the undersigned, Stm MN :.`;9:.... F+"nCut ~ # N.895930 E. .147.74 y° ~e I ~ I 1>'~ 0 6.., ti ro ~ ro a 16 161.z' • x.::.... 6~~... +ry + +ry Asphalt Pavement c i ~ Meter ,4~4r~:tlr} b!ciriiY ~ ry^' ry~ ; 7. WilsonMilier, inc. accepts no responsibility for the identification of the y ° L I ry ~h. U :^i jE ti^ ~ tree species shown hereon. Every effort has been made to properly ;o ~ Weir Strocture , 0 06 I I i. Skimmer = 26.97 I A ry1,~+y ~ I ii i Grate = 26.98 ~ ~ ~ identify trees shown hereon, however tree identification is .outside. of • ro I ~ Weir = 24.01 , ro ',W ~ , the area of expertise of a Professional Surveyor and, Mapper.. The tree ~ d~' 11" ; ~ o I ~ I I ?;;i ~1ry , y, h Two Story Two Story Masonry Buildin p` ~ g ~ ~ types shown are for informational ur oses onl and should onl be •:.t'>: ~ ~ ry ry 1• 130" PVC . a a 1~' ry ~ OfTENAON POND , 0 O iiiliV: 60 f `I 11 ry1. ,if , ~ ~ . pa''~^~°:~;;;: • `6 I . . used after confirmation by a .Certified Arborist or other such professional, ~ : `a:. . su ~1~ ry1• C./, ~2 I ry i f c ' 6; a ~ ~ ~ Mitered fnd Section ° a. ~ Q~ 1n. I i p ryy.. c ~ _ 1 60y I ~ lnv,= 21.06 I + 6 61 h i i i p ~~t i ~ 3 ~ ry I ~ 15.6 p ry6• 6a 6'~ ry q0 h I :i::' i i a y0•. ~ 65.6' ss' 1zg' ,a:~x ry' apt +ry RECEIVED 'F"~:: :1, i ' 4' q ryy + ry6. ~ rylryo ry6' 61y :;}r I !4y +ryy ry 6 6 ~ S+ ry I ii. 11 t •ryy a ti::• _ e ee yh ay ~ I T.R za o ~ tz::~~A~ !5 Maple o ry 6y ryyy ryy L rylary f 1^y ~ N 8~ 8 JUL 28 2006 V 12.0'0 40.T 0 h IJ6' ~ •~~•ri'rF~ ~ ryo+ ,41 4, 4' ~ ~ J M J - ~ /2"~ ry1~y ti y ~ ~ y6 66y i%: 10~I+ ry1~1 1~ 1'Y1 Top ,PA Bank 1b,•_ •}ry 1,a ~ry1^6 W' W' ~ ~ 'W' ' v~ ~Y 1z.3' BushQ F.LP. '~~:c~'~r ryp1ry^°ry G DEPARTMENT i 5895454 W. 140.88 s1R n 61 0b SIR, ryy yy . :'t , SI R• 13 - 6:.. .r . ................,..~1~:.:., k . TY OF CLEAR • WA ,y1 ::~:3`dh:^7illli~ :~?~;ti4ir w 9 ,.................:::,~:,~:•:,~:.:•::~:;:::rr:::,~::::::::::::::.~::::,:~::,: 6 oa Parkin Meter , g .....,.;...,..,..,,..~.,,..,..,,.,..!t'~.i~:.::~::::e:.4".'4.R~•,~...5.~!f`,......,.,,.,~:....,.......,...,...•°yi.................,......,,......fit:... 6 a M 0 b ~ ~...11~:...............,...,.......,........ 6 6 Y 1• (0 , . , •...,.gV......,....•...,. ry ry Son MH ~4 6. 6 :~:.ry~.::. y. 1 1 M1 on Conc Pod BfP oo 6 ry6 ry ~ ry ry ry ~ PREPARED" FOR; C of S Religious Trust ~fP oo ® ~ ® 10.0 0p !0" W ~ ° b'~ p`' ' ~ y1 ~ yy 6• G :;;9'ana~~'a7r.'•f~r.:•::•::.:~:. ry C C (Typical) f0" 8rP ryy. CC ~F•:.~.- G y' C C a ® ry ey G a 1y .,?':r'rW.r5. ~ W w ----~1f"6t1~- W g' ry°' ry p , _ yti 6 0 1 a y, y, . ey y y y yry ry y' :r: ryy~ay ~ ryy ry ......ii:(i0YlCrQr~V~iizi.^e. ry ry h N `•°r'ry6•y a ry 1 y*°; i ~'Cl. ~y~ ry ryy 2' Cont. CGrb ~'y ry69° y y9ry ry6 pry ry6•e , y°, ,kry6.6~": . ~ This survey is not valid without thesignature and "original . ~ y6 ya C.l., 6°~Parkln 6° ry : ry Porking ryy ry6' ryy y` ryy Parking M` yy ro ry ~ Nh ry 4 M1 9 h j 6y••.,, ryy ry......_...........1._.•- ryy e~~Y i` ry6• j ~ P o r k i n g ^6• i ry6 ry I. ~ I _ raised seal of a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper. ...k_....__.....__....__._..__.._.o ,6 ,y C1 9 , ~ p . 6 1....._._»_ y _ 6 ry y ryy ryy h a ~1 6 A 0 0 6? yea y?° ~ ry ~ y 6 6• 1~ ryy ry6. ryy. h M1~ ry 61 Ory ry M1 h N0 Q a~ a1 ~ 10 y'` 6tQ ryy, ry6, ryy. ry6• iry6' ti~ ryy' 1~ _ y _ `a6....:.. iti.......,. :..............M,._.,... _ .........1...._._ _ ..........__.........._._.............._..,....._..__.....__.__I _ _.__:...........................1......._........_ ~ry..•_..._,_ ...dry _.F^•~ I ~ ~ WILSON: MIL , ,,~i~NC" " _ p ...__..~__...,_........_{ry_._..........._.__...l (9 . yy _ lane line y. ~ 1" ~ +ry y` a1 y .,6 oa ~ry Son MN Q y 6' p +ry6 6• San MN O yh y. San MN O y. 6• ryy' ryy' iry Iry.: h ry ry ry ry ,1..__,.._.__..~__ _ ...__..,......__._..........._....__..._..,..-I ..p 6 ryp^ ryp~ ry6 iry1ti pry^p ~ . i .N -1,__._...___._....._._.._. ~ ` ~ _ • . tuna onra ,.1 Q COURT STREET Florida Surveyor and Mapper No. 5489 Z Asphalt Pavement W U V ¦ 1 ¦ n~ • au~tacooow RE # REVISION DATE INIT,/EMP# ACTIVITY INITIALS/EMP, NO. DATE w ry-CwllaaolArRalMonkJ CI a~~a CLIENT: DATE: TITLE:. J REV# REVISION DATE INIT./EMP# PARTY CHIEF: Q.F. PC/NO DATE 04-26-06 BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC Q Wei iiiier DRWN/NO. DATE K REV# REVISION DATE INIT./EMP# DRAWN BY. J.G.C. C_OF-S_RELIGIOUS_TRUST HORIZONTAL SCALE: _ CHECKED BY: S.E.S. " DESGN/NO DATE Fkmem &phwo Ecokote • arve L~ Tranqsorfabor?Colanb REV# REVISION • • • W RATE INIT,/EMP# Pi vEeTlcA~ ALE: AND-TREE-LOCATION-SURVEY INDEX-NUMBER: L 3 SCALE: PROJECT: REV# REVISION Wtko 1Mhr' Inc. i DATE INIT,/EMP# F.B. PINELLAS; PG.7 FBOOK/PGS DATE NSA N/A 4. N~ples•Forf Myero9araeota•Brecknron•Tstnpe•Tslefwesee IQREV NO. REVISION DATE DRAWN BY / EMR N0. CNECKE0 BY / EMP. Ns. "WM APPROVED BY: m ChamAw* o*A wit ow • Tw7m Paw 33902 • now 813-223.m • F w 80-223.O009 • Web-S(!a wwwMibow*r00m CHURCH-OF-SCIENTOLOGY SEC: TWP: RGE: CROSS REFERENCE FILE NO.: PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER: >l *ram 16, 29 15 CROSS 05573 1 of 1