Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2006-11060
0% E ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION,, INC BOAT SLAP PROJECT March 15, 2007 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RE: FLD2006-11060 REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONE NEW BOAT SLIP AND PIER OVER THE ASSOCIATION'S DEEDED SUBMERGED LAND, ADJACENT TO ITS UPLAND PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT., CLEARWATER, FL W, HARBORAGE 1 Board of Directors: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court O GE Bill Wilton, president Clearwater, Florida 33767 Jim Bono • Chuck Greeley Phone: 727-595-5396 Leon Hibbs • Gloria Sharp 0414iku DECEIVED To: City of Clearwater Community Development Board Topic: Flexible Development Application #FLD2006-11060 Date: 2/28/07 From: Harborage One Board of Directors Members of the Community Development Board, MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The purpose of this cover letter is to inform the Community Development Board • that the Board of Directors of the Harborage. One Condominium Association, by unanimous vote, support this boat dock project. We, as representatives of the sixty-four unit owners of the Condominium, have reviewed this variance application and the supporting documentation for accuracy and completeness. A favorable decision will allow us to install the fifth and final boat slip previously approved by all jurisdictions having authority over the project. This also means we can fill the request of one more unit owner to moor their boat at Harborage. We trust that you will give careful consideration to our request resulting in a favorable decision. Sincerely, Bill Wilton, president Z-- Rim Jim Bono, director Chuc i ctor Le Hibbs, director 6Y Gloria Sharp, dir or 0 • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPAkiMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED TABLE OF CONTENTS KA 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMEN1 CITY OF CLEARWATER TAB 0 Section 1 - Description, Purpose and Background ............. 1 Section 2 - Flexible Development Application ............... 2 Section 3 - Responses to: Section 3-601. Docks .............. 3 Section 4 - Responses to: Development Review Agenda ....... 4 Attachment A - Written Submittal Requirements ................. 5 Attachment B - Site Plan, Drawing #111606 ..................... 6 Attachment C - Richardson Dock Variance ...................... 7 Attachment D - Development Review Agenda ................... 8 Attachment E - Community Development Code .................. 9 Attachment F - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit #200305182... 10 Attachment G - Florida DEP Permit #52-0160074-002 ............. 11 Attachment H - Pinellas County Permit #M36990-06 .............. 12 Attachment I - Submerged Land Ownership Documents............ 13 Attachment J - Uplands Legal Description ...................... 14 Attachment K - Harborage I Owners List ........................ 15 Photograph - Aerial View .................................. Photo #1 Photograph - Aerial View Close-Up Photo #2 Photograph - Richardson House and Boat Lift .................. Photo #3 Photograph - Richardson House and Boat Slip Site .............. Photo #4 0 • • • okirpIN?I' RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 0 • HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC • BOAT SLIP PROJECT Section 1- DESCRIPTION. PURPOSE and BACKGROUND 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DESCRIPTION Construct one (1) additional boat slip and pier; increasing the number of existing slips from thirty-two (32) ,to thirty-three (33). The new slip will be located in the northeast corner of the property as shown on Attachment B, dwg. #111606 dated November 16, 2006, revised January 16, 2007. The fixed pier will measure 3.5ft wide x 42.Oft long and the slip size will be 20.5ft wide [outside pole dimension] x 61.0ft long. The east tie poles will be within the slip boundary and setback from the property line 1 ft, in accordance with City of Clearwater requirements. The use of the slip will be restricted to "In-Water- Mooring", [wet slip]...no boat lifts will be allowed. Both the pier and the slip will be constructed over submerged lands deeded to the Harborage Condo Assoc., Inc. and recorded in Book 7394, Page 969. Electrical power and water service will be installed after construction of the pier is complete. PURPOSE This slip is needed to fulfill one of the many requests from Harborage I condo owners, • who desire to have exclusive use of a slip for their boat. The Harborage Condo Assn. Inc. retains ownership of the slip, but can transfer the "Use Rights" to a condo owner for an agreed upon amount of money. The net funds from the sale are deposited in the condo general fund, to be used as determined by the Board of Directors to benefit all unit owners. BACKGROUND The Harborage Condo (also know as Harborage I) was constructed in 1983 with 64 residential units and 28 boat slips. Over the years the Board of Directors received numerous requests from the 36 unit owners, who did not own boat slips, requesting a chance to have their own slip. (Governed by the condo documents, only unit owners can own a slip for their boat, but can rent or sell their rights to another owner). In 2003 the Board voted in favor of constructing five (5) additional boat slips ...the owners to be determined by lottery, secured by a down payment. The quantity of five (5) slips was determined after an internal committee evaluated the space available and the requirements of all of the jurisdictions having authority over the project. The Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, (including the "Save the Manatee Foundation" ), FL Dept. of Environmental Protection, Pinellas County Environmental Management (Water and Navigation) and the Cities of Clearwater and Belleair Beach, were all consulted prior to beginning the permitting process. After approximately ten months all necessary permits were received. 40 Page 1 ORIGINAL. RECENED Section 1- DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE and BACKGROUND 13 2007 PLANNING OEEAKMENT CfTY OF CL'EARWATER BACKGROUND (cont'd.) The approved plan called for three (3) slips to be constructed, next to the south marina (in the City of Belleair Beach) and two slips in the north marina (in the City of Clearwater). From the beginning, it was know that the eastern-most slip on the south side, next to the property line between Harborage I and The Moorings would require a variance. Belleair Beach officials indicated that they would grant the variance as long as the adjoining property owner, Brian Hickok would agree. Mr. Hickok was contacted and he agreed he would have no problem with the variance, since he had an existing pier only 2 ft. from the same property line. (Apparently and earlier Harborage I Board had agreed to allow the previous property owner to build the pier). At the mandatory Belleair Beach Variance Board hearing, Mr. Hickok reversed his previous verbal approval and objected to construction of the slip. He wasjoined in the objection by David Richardson, (who owns the adjacent home in the Moorings on the north side of the Harborage I property ...the same person who objects to this variance request). The request for the variance was subsequently denied by Belleair Beach without an opportunity for appeal. Mr. Richardson purchased his residence at 1648 Sand Key Estates from Ernst Fredrich and Petra Will who applied to the City of Clearwater for a permit to construct a dock and boat lift on April 7, 2000. (See Attachment C) They wished • to locate the lift and dock as close as possible to their west property line, adjacent to the Harborage Condo property. In 1999 the City adopted a new rule governing the construction of new boat docks; stating that the pier must be located in the center 1/3 of the property. A variance request was submitted, to allow the dock to be built in the western 1/3 of the property. In addition, a side setback variance was requested to allow the boat lift to be installed within 8 ft. of the property line in lieu of the required 10 ft. (See Attachment B [drawing]) to see the position of the Richardson boat lift. (Also see Photos #2, 3 & 4) Approval was granted by the City on April 11, 2000... but only after the Board President of the Harborage Condo Association granted approval. The original owners wished to open up their waterfront, for a better view; a nice amenity which Mr. Richardson enjoys today, due to the foresight of the original owners and the understanding and spirit of cooperation of the Harborage I residents. It is ironic that a variance granted to Mr. Richardson's property by the Harborage I residents is now being opposed using.the same setback criteria. • Page 2 • CJ • • Section 1- DESCRIPTION. PURPOSE and BACKGROUND ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER BACKGROUND (cont'd. The project continued with construction of two (2) of the three (3) slips on the Belleair Beach (south) side and the two (2) originally planned for the Clearwater (north) side. All four (4) piers and slips were completed in the summer of 2005 in accordance with all permits. The Harborage I Board agreed that, if at all possible, the 5t' slip should be built, since a condo owner (who was next in-line from the original lottery), was willing to buy a slip, even if it was a wet slip with a "no-boat lift" restriction. The next step was to revise the original permits, requesting that the 5t` slip be constructed on the north side in lieu of the south side. This process which included another review by the FL Dept. of Environmental Protection, took approximately five months. All revised permits and/or approvals were obtained, including those from the FLDEP, Pinellas County Water and Navigation and the City of Clearwater and the contractor awarded the job, began the installation. Mr. David Richardson (mentioned previously, who objected to construction of the slip on the Belleair Beach side), once again objected and Clearwater issued a "Stop Order" on the installation. In accordance with the order, the project was stopped and the contractor moved his equipment off the site. Harborage I had to pay the contractor for work performed, including mobilization of equipment and manpower. This background narrative provides the history of the project and brings us to the current date. The Harborage I Board respectively requests that the City's Planning Dept. staff makes a favorable recommendation, to grant the variance as described in the attached documents. The Board believes that no adverse consequence (to Mr. Richardson or anyone else) would be the result of constructing the proposed boat slip. Page 3 0 0 • ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARiMEN7 CITY OF CLEARWATER • 0 A Planning Department G o r 100 South Myrtle Avenue -1 Clearwater Florida 33756 rwate •?,. „? ? Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets $ p SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ f CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL RECEIVED ViAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME:OM /I(! /(W • MAILING ADDRESS: 'V 4W 1, AM 7 PHONE NUMBER: 1127 y7!3- T42- FAX NUMBER: 121) 773-874 0 PROPERTY OWNER(S): &-AV.&nZAWC (O-A&2O 7lAfA/UM fi?J??aGV?`ii??- -??rL- • List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: C16,52% At. 5374 7 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER CELL NUMBER: F/j? Zz 7•.Ql?9S E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: T iP PROJECT VALUATION: $ ?? 8 7?? STREET ADDRESS t rle PARCEL NUMBER(S): O 9 l 3J?p3o 999 p0/4 PARCEL SIZE (acres): ?. ?Z_ •,_ _ PARCEL SIZE (square feetk leg AV LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ??' ?JffA??T J PROPOSED USE(S):?Q(// _? ,?c??fE L1_ ByJ?ll?t/IT l?GiliVlr? TZ1 /?GIOI/? TAG/?C Bow!" _ . _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: !, 1?3• ??? 'T1?F?itp?T3/LSE _347-W409 Jn• ?? Specifically identify the request 94.4 7 ? ro 9 / Q A (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all2• equested code deviations; e.g_ O Z eduction in required number of r7T 7A OF 2:7;4*0 • parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Jit".,E L ?D{ML7• 7 1(7(0 & Planning DepanmentWpptication Formstdevetopment revievA2006 Fomrffie-,dWe Devebpment (FU]) 2006.doa Page I of7 11 • SST . DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT' ?? ` DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable oocLX C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved. In detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed t The proposed development is designed .to minimize traffic congestion. -- - -- The proposed development is consistent with the cornavoidy character of the immediate vicinity of the paroel proposed for development. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. on adjacent properties. 0 0 SAP'annuy iJrp:i,:"IentlHppjjcanun Forms'Wevelopment sevievA2006 FOrmatFW"" oevebprtront'(FLO) 2006.d& I'age 2 or? 000 • • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) .' I J? Provide complete responses tb the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed In each Zoning District to which tfte waiver is %J requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved. in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storrs Drainage Design Criteria 1 Manual and 4-202.A.21). ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST_.BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must Include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptia' ?quimmen4 ? If a plan is not required. the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site Is exempt. RECEIVED ?? ? At a minimum. the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; VAR 13 2007 ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; PLANNCITYIN ING CLE DEPARTMENT PARTMER ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems: ? Proposed stormwater detentiontretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with ? the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure: ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INOUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT ? SUBMITTAL (SWFW MO approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included and finished floor Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum. a grading plan elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION APPLICATION MUST REQUIREMENT FOR A AND SIIGMNIFIC?ANT DELAY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, MAY OCCUR. ent at (727) 562 4750. If you have questions regaraing these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202-A) One original and 14 copies; Q SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (intruding legal descrtptron of property) - TREE SURVEY (incwuis J :AstiN trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species. size (DBH 4" or greater). and location, i0lf including drip lines Grid r1 oicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees: TREE INVENTORY, pr ? ,wed by a -certified arbonst', of all trees 8' DBH or greater, reflecting size. canopy (gip lines) and condition of such trees;. ? LOCATION MAP OF TtyE PRUPEHTY: PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards pe. Reduce number of spaces). oved by the Community Development Coord i nator and Prior to the submittal „r ;r us apptic:ruorr, the methodology of such study shalt be. appr will be used in detemtining whether or not ance: vwAtti acceptua traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study ar King standards are approved: as appt,caule: LRA til evidence of recording a final plat is pro'i?)• LAT. a, required (Nute: Building permits will not be issued un RDS`.:-L,.`.. as iopp+rcable. r arnrs%deveiopment reviewt2006 ForrrisT-"bte pavetopment (FLO) 2006.doc y _w Page 3 of 7 • • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) O SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24' x 36'): _? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package: ? North arrow: .5,416ET I 67,0c' .Z , Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _? All dimensions; 1? Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; its Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _? All required setbacks: ? All existing and pruposed points of access; All required sight triangles: Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands. tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements: Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines; manholes and Oft stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces. driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material. Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities: Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures: and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writterdtabutar form: EXISTING Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways. expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area: Official records buok and page numbers of all existing utility easement: Building and structure heights: Impermeable sutlol u ratio (i.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (f_A.R.) for all nonresidential uses- REQUIRED PROPOSE* O REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8% X 11): O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-toot contours or spot elevations on site: Offsite elevations it rcquw(ed to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space at eat. Location of all ealtrt ut water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and buildu,y lutes (dimensioned); Streets and dnvcn "OuI;etutulled). Building and sit":_::J, sutua xs (dimensioned): Structural .fivern<l; aj:s. iF':;.rm?nq UepajlmemNpphcanon Famstoevelopmenl rewevA2006 Forrrts%Flexlde Development (FLD) 2006.doc Pagc 4 ot7 • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? DSCAPE PLAN.with the following information (not to exceed 24' x 36'): ORIGINAL All existing and proposed structures: RECEIVED Names of abutting streets: Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; KAR 13 2007 Delineation and dimensions of all required peri meter landscape buffers. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Sight visibility triangles: CITY OF CLEARWATER _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing: Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the 'site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey): Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule: Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the sae, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures: Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. • I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information: All sides of all buildings: Dimensioned: Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials: Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Y2 X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs: Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they Will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs: Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing: freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Prograln application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage plopvsal (8 1/, x 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. 5 kplaf1-19 L)eortn+enl%pplicanon Formskdeveiopmenc reviewk20o6 FormsWteai01e Devebpment (FLO) 2006.doc Page 5 or 7 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a `Sooping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562.4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all Intersections Identified in the Scoping.Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Adrninistration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291. and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562.4334. M. SIGNATURE: I. the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA ((rr,, Swo to and subscribed before me this duly of A.D. 20 to me and/or by Q . ! t1h c?L who is perlo'nally known has produced- T71 7?1 I as iT tion. u r 1 n 11_ O,. ! V t.t Q ?'1???. expires: ` i ,LJ 2 (o Z,e)O 5 *V SUZANNE SCHROEDER S:Wlannin9 OepartmenIkApplication FormsWev ? pe of Florida elopmenl review12006 F I PC?F'4? orms Page*6 of 7 y comm. expires May 26. 2008 . No. 00 3241116 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 4 representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application: N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: KAR 13 2007 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: PLANNING 0hRAR i INTENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): .ltE f??cr/mewr e--4SF''0f' 4VAlws) 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe: request) &Z J,* Al,e 7D ??.ntS/? ,trc?.? {?L•r" •?l ?Z ?1' ,,JW N17,?.? lit4STE/1r,Q O.-C& E QQ(.Ca?;?E'?u/.P 1. dT f,?'o/?? J ??S! aF ALE 1?'Gt/?T 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doestdo) appoint as (hisitheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City 1 7. That (Uwe), . ned , hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. t?e P?f Own Property Owner 'UAk Property Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida. on this ' ? day of ? ` D t who having been first duly swum ?V? jt , (..I [,personally appeared ` ` Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that SUZANNE SCHROEDER x Notary Public: State of Florida My comm. expires thy 26.2008 OD 324016 N Public Signature No . Not My Commission Expi 1 SAPlanning Department%pplieation FormsWevetopreM ievierA2006 Formfflexibte Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 7 of 7 9 0 U C0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DERARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. BOAT SLIP PROJECT Section 3 - Responses to: Section 3-601. DOCKS DIVISION 6. DOCKS / MARINA STANDARDS in THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Note: See Attachment E) 2. MULTI-USE DOCKS This dock (pier) is the second and final phase of a project to construct three (3) new boat slips. This pier will cover 147 sq. ft., adding to the two previously permitted and constructed piers, which totaled 336 sq. ft.... making the total deck area equal to 483 sq. ft. Note: One of the piers is located on the south side of the property, in Belleair Beach's jurisdiction. 3. COMMERCIAL DOCKS a) Use and compatibility. This pier will contribute to the comfort, convenience, necessity and safety of the users in the following way: The pier will be 3'6" wide for its entire length of 42' and be constructed level with the entry and exit point at the seawall. This width allows two people to pass safely or walk hand-in-hand with a child and/or tow a cart or wheeled cooler to and from the boat. The size, scale and placement of the proposed wet boat slip, has been carefully designed to be in harmony with, and in character with the adjacent existing construction in the following ways: 1) The projection of the pier from the seawall, does not extend (out into the harbor) any further than the adjoining slips. 2) The height of the pier above the waterline will be the same as the adjacent piers. 3) The decking will match the color and texture of the existing piers in the Harborage Marina. 4) The new slip and pier will be constructed over submerged lands deeded to the Harborage and recorded in Book 7394, Page 969. 5) Access to the new pier via a walkway, will be contained within the Harborage property. (See Attachment B [Drawing]) b) Impacts on existing water recreation activities. This slip will be located in a harbor which is completely "ringed" with private boat slips, either owned or with exclusive private "use rights" (see photo #1). The new slip does not create any adverse effects, since it will only be one more boat slip added to a harbor, which is now home to approximately 100 boats. c) Impacts on navigation. The new slip will not impede boat traffic, contribute to congestion or have a negative impact on navigation, for the following reason: It will be "in-line" with existing slips and is located in the harbor which is approximately 330 ft. wide (see photo #1). Note: Water and Navigation has approved the installation of this pier. • Page 4 0 0 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. BOAT SLIP PROJECT ORIGINAL PFCFIvEr) Section 3 - COMMERCIAL DOCKS (cont'd),.? 3 2007 P'Al""'*6 L)I:PARf V1ENT d) Impacts on marine environment. CITY OF CLWWATER This project has received extensive review and all necessary permits have been issued by: 1. Army Corps of Engineers 2. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 3. Save the Manatee Foundation 4. Florida Department of Environmental Protection 5. Pinellas County Environmental Management (Water and Navigation) 6. City of Clearwater 7. City of Belleair Beach e) Impacts on water quality. This "deep-water" harbor has been in use as a recreational boat basin since the construction of the Isle of Sand Key condo in 1972. To our .knowledge, there have been no adverse impacts on water quality and do not anticipate any as a result of this new pier and slip. The water depth within the proposed slip exceeds the one foot minimum clearance above ordinary low water. f) Impacts on natural resources. There are no known adverse impacts. None were discovered during the reviews as described in (Item d) above. g) Impacts on wetlands habitat/uplands. The pier will not have a material adverse affect upon the surrounding uplands, any more than the adjacent existing boat slips. The proposed construction of this one pier cannot hinder or discourage development of adjacent land, since no more vacant land is available. h) Dimensional .standards. i) Setbacks. s This application has defined a two-part Variance Request (#1 & #2) as described on the "Flexible Development Application" (Section B) and on Drawing #111606 - Attachment B. ii) Length. The proposed pier will satisfy this requirement: 75% of 290 ft. = 217.5 ft. The Dock will be 42 ft. long. (See Attachment B) 0 Page 5 ORIGINAL HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. RECEIVED • BOAT SLIP PROJECT VAI R 13 2007 Section 3 -COMMERCIAL DOCKS (cont'd.) PLANNING DEPARTMiNT CITY OF CLEARWATER iii) Width. VARIANCE REQUEST #2 is to obtain relief on the 75% nde, increasing the Marina width to 87% of the width of the waterfront property (290 ft.). (See Attachment B) • 0 Page 6 0 0 ORIGINAL (RECEIVED • • K AR 13 2001 PLANNING DEPARfIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r? 0 0 01ra RECEIVED • HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. BOAT SLIP PROJECT Section 4 - Responses to: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AGENDA Dated January 4, 2007, Pages 24 and 25 Development Review Committee (DRC) Comments VAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Environmental 1. Prior to CDB, provide a benthic survey for use in the environmental review. Ed Chesney, Environmental Engineering, has waived this requirement. 2. Provide copies of SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and Submerged Land Lease prior to the commencement of construction. See Attachments F, G, H and I. • Fire 1. Must meet NFPA 303, 2000 edition -- Chapter 4 Fire Protection - 4.3.4* An approved water supply shall be provided within 100 ft. (30.5m) of the pier/land intersection of fire department connection serving fire protection systems. FDC can be at the street within 100 ft. of fire hydrant and provide 2 1/2 in. hose valves on the dock. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. We acknowledge the need to comply with the NFPA requirements. 2. Must meet NFPA 303, 2000 Edition - Chapter 4 Fire Protection 4.2 for Portable Fire Extinguishers. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. We acknowledge the need to comply with the NFPA requirements. 0 Page 7 r- -I LJ n ORIGINAL RECEIVED Section 4 - Responses to: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AGENDA Dated January 4, 2007, Page 26, Items 1 thru 14 i,:.AR 13 2007 (Note: See Attachment D) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. Harborage Condominium Association, Inc. is not listed with the State Division of Corporations. Recommend registering with the State. The Board of Directors will consider the recommendation. 2. Section 3-601.h.1 requires multi-use and commercial docks abutting single family or two-family property to be setback a minimum of one-third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single family or two- family property. Staff misread this provision previously as only requiring a setback of 10 percent of the applicant's property width measured at the waterfront property line. With the waterfront width being 290 ft., the correct setback from the east property line is 96.67 ft. to 21.5 ft. The application and the site plan have been revised. (See Attachment B) 3. Provide on the site plan the setback from the east property line to the easternmost existing pier/catwalk of the existing dock. With the introduction of the new proposed dock, provide the revised width of slip #1. This distance has been noted on the site plan as 42 ft. 6 in. The width of slip #I will be 17 ft. 6 in., which is also shown on the revised site plan. (Attachment B) 4. Potential condition of approval: That the easternmost slip be prohibited from having a boat lift. A restrictive covenant, acceptable to the City, shall be recorded in the public records prior to the Planning Department signoff on the County permit. This is acceptable. 5. Potential condition of approval: that the boat moored at this eastern slip be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guest of the condominium and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominium. The condo documents prohibit the use of the boat slips by anyone other then their owners or their tenants. is Page 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED • Section 4 - Responses to: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AGENDA (cont'd.) t, AR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 6. Potential condition of approval: That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. Signs are already posted at the entrance to both the north and south docks. 7. Potential condition of approval: That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction. These documents will be provided as requested. (See Attachments F, G and I) 8. Page 1 of the FLD application states the project valuation is $30,000. However, on the City of Clearwater building permit application the valuation was listed as $9,876 and on Progressive Management, Inc. letterhead for the County permit the valuation was listed as $9,876. If the correct valuation is $9,876, then revise page 1 of the FLD application. is The revision has been made. 9. Based on site inspection, many of the existing boat slips on the north side are currently empty. Do all of the slip owners have boats they keep in their slips, or do unit owners buy the slips to increase the value of their units? Have all of the slips been full, driving the desire for additional slips? You have indicated that slip owners can rent their slip to other owners in the condominium. Is this being done? All of the slip owners do not have boats in their slips. Ten (10) of the sixteen (16) slips on the north side are occupied with boats as of 2/24/07. One lift is empty but only because the owner is looking to buy a new boat. Owners, who have bought slips, typically do so to moor a boat. Of the first four (4) slips built as part of this project, two are occupied, one has recently received a new lift and the fourth has just been sold and the owner will be installing a lift for their boat. Slips are being rented to owners who do not own a slip. Some slips are empty because the owner's tenant does not have a boat. 0 Page 9 0 0 • Section 4 - Responses to: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AGENDA (cont'd.) 10. General Applicability Criteria #2 response: If setbacks are established to maintain compatibility with adjacent properties to avoid negative impacts, provide a revised response as to how the addition of this slip will not significantly impair the value of the adjacent single family property. We attempted, to the best of our ability, to respond to this issue in Attachment A, Items 1, 2 and 6, titled "Flexible Development Application, Sec. D Written Submittal Requirements". NOTE: We believe the owner of the adjacent single family property should be required to state, in writing, exactly why he believes his property value will drop, after installation of this slip. 11. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.i (setbacks) response: Revise response to setback reduction from 96.67 ft. to 21.2 ft. The Community Development Code was adopted in 1999. This setback regulation may have been erroneously overlooked in 2004, but must still be applied to this application today. The requested setback reduction from 96.67 ft. to 21.5 ft. was previously addressed in #2 above and is shown on the site plan. (See Attachment B) • 12. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.ii (length) response: Provide a response as to HOW the proposal is meeting the requirement. The length of the proposed dock will be 42 ft., well within the 217 ft. 6 in. limit. 13. Based on a site inspection, how will the slip owner and guests safely (from a liability standpoint) access the dock? There is no sidewalk proposed, with steps from the parking lot to the dock at the seawall level (nor is there any existing sidewalk and steps for the existing docks). There is only five feet from the tennis court fence to the seawall, including the hedge surrounding the tennis court. After removal of the hedge, a new hard surface walkway, 3 ft. wide running between the tennis court and the seawall, will connect the existing pavement to the new pier. The drawing shows the approximate location. (See Attachment B) 14. Revise Page 1 of the application to show parcel size (acreage) as 2.42 acres. The revision has been made. ORIGINAL RECEIVED VAR 13 2007 is PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 10 CITY OF CLEARWATER • • • ORIGINAL RECEIVED, 131007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • ATTACHMENT A ORIGINAL • RECEIVED HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. 13 2007 BOAT SLIP PROJECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Responses to: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, CITY OF CLEARWATER Sec. D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The size, scale and placement of the proposed wet boat slip, has been carefully designed to be in harmony with, and in character with the adjacent existing construction in the following ways: 1) The projection of the pier from the seawall, does not extend (out into the harbor) any further than the adjoining slips, both within the Harborage or the single family home in the Moorings "zero lot line" development; 2) The height of the pier above the waterline will be the same as the adjacent piers; 3) The decking will match the color and texture of the existing piers in the Harborage Marina; 4) The new slip and pier will be constructed over submerged lands deeded to the Harborage and recorded in Book 7394, Page 969; ® and, 5) Access to the new pier via a walkway, will be contained within the Harborage property. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed new slip cannot hinder or discourage development of adjacent land since no more vacant land is available. The value of the existing properties will not be :impaired, since all available space around the harbor (other than this location) is already occupied with boat slips. The converse is true; since the value of the condo unit, whose owner will have use rights to the new slip, will increase. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. There is no anticipated adverse affect to the health and safety of people using the pier. To improve safety, the pier will be 3 ft. 6 in. wide for its entire length of 42 ft. and be constructed level with the entry and exit point at the seawall. This width allows two people to pass safely or walk hand-in-hand with a child and tow a cart or wheeled cooler to and from the boat. 0 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT A - (cont'd.) RECEINED' Responses to: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, ( 3 2007 Sec. D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNINtp rIEpARYMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The new slip will not impede boat traffic or contribute to congestion, since it is "in- line" with existing slips and is located in the harbor which is approximately 220 ft. across to the other side ...as measured between the ends of the Harborage I and Isle of Sand Key.slips. (See Photo #1) 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The slip is located in a harbor which is completely "ringed" with private boat slips, either owned or with exclusive "use rights". (See Photo #1) Three condo developments; The Harborage, Isle of Sand Key, Dan's Island and the single family homes of the Moorings of Sand Key all enjoy having their boats moored next to their homes. This slip will allow one more homeowner the benefit of mooring their boat in a safe harbor at their door step. 6. The design of the proposed develoPment minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The new slip does not create any adverse effects, since it will only be one more boat slip added to a harbor, which is now home to approximately 100 boats. As stated in Item *1 above (inserts 1 & 2), the slip design and position will impose no visual impairment to the "straight-out-line-of-sight" of the inhabitants in the adjacent single family home. The "zero lot line" layout of the Moorings has resulted in the boat slips being very close together. The addition of this slip creates no more severe visual or acoustic adverse consequence than already exists within the Moorings or the harbor. 40 Page 2 of 2 0 0 • ORIGINAL RECEIVED 13 1001 PLANNING DEPARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER n 0 HArR5 V?1A7'E9'F90M7 PROPERTY W 107H • -VARIAIJCt- RWUESr *Z r RX15T, I Pl ? ?, SLI $# , p ??gE1?g c0N$TRv,:, mrr 0 rMIM3,124308-04- 0 I r? 144 I ? a _ a I EX)5 ', PIER (4WX,+AZQ.) C?X15T.?FZIGINAL PERM l'T`i'E-D soaPSk 13 ? 11 10 290' -262.6' 87% of 290'( REQUESTED) 75% of 2qo' (pr=yxjipmn) Ws-REI J FINGER PIER © 04- 190, p?ERS j .SUPS-*ithrU14 IN 1980 (*M90520-80) 0Q) i END PIE' VwX40 00 41 a Ilz , SEAWALL S' C TCrAL AKEA of EX 1511 MG PI 6-F,S 4 WALKWAYS ? J.8 32 SQ;::-r 2. AREA of PROP0.50V PIGR -* 14-7 SQI=7' PROP05E'D NEW WE`T' BOAT" Sl.1 P -Fo yr to 111 HE HARe)OF?qNG E CONDO ASSN, I N C 1051 5AN D KEY GS`CATF- S CT. CLEA 7I 767 DCtN; KEt4 ©6L.SAV- at_tr,,::c?? PWG 111GOG. 1Sheep'9c+l EXIST FIXED WALKWAYiPIERS PLAN VIEW SCALE '/W' :5,p.0 o 5 ?o zo0 4o so `o zo SITE PLAN F 175' 42 N . ? I 20. ? 11 OLr'(*1D£`. YIE roL as SMAu, - ? w 5L1 P RICHA?Z &N 1 i 50AT / i LIFT I ?IA ?•,•?c??0 ? {?11vFRr1! EXIST, " I T H I S COURT On. u-.nc?tr VAV,IANCE R6Q G5T` ? ee: FL7=X I BI.E DEYELDPMENT /r?i.ICAZON S?oN : S . [ATTACHMENT B $>:AWRLL CAP Ko" wlos S' NEW LINE PIER z (t?squFS?D) (REQUIRED) Moog INC5 HARBORAGE CONDO SAND KEY ? s • zJoe C= LU W i-? G"•Ir al fur'/ :.t: z ! U 0 E 0 0 RECEIVED • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER VAR 13 2007 9 04/06!2000 12:57 7275954053 JAY" 9 43AIL J0F?GZW1 PAr3£ 03 £.E THE MOOR/NQ$i OF SAND; HOMEOWNERS.`ASSOC., INC m ARCHITECTURAL: "REVIEW BOARD Fritz Wills 1Q4d Band Key Estates Court CJetrwatsr, Florlds 2Mi s ?es t zr Ap rl 6, 200, M1n p " o f o • c, Dssr _ Frlts and Pete; O a !1?- Q z or r This k to nouly you Mat your appHa 1. Doolr Inetslistlon Z tiff station location has been fA7 approved at a meeting of the APB MW on PENDING . with the following" owd117eetlons and/or c*mm ntsr That the work As done in accordance with the plans as submhW by Spotter Enteforls" ""0. Pending rocdpt of approval from Harborage L Copy of We approvd is bong seM to Speelsr Eno y1m A doUy In aw opprovsl `wss dui to having to` meet W#h City pli mOg people to nmotwo ome' Amew t. The meeting was attended tip Doug " Sp/eater and mypd 414/0& Formal approval wX be a»de by the AND at ft- next mh*d~ nwedin0• M you have queetlonr or conmWIS concerning the above, phase fill hw to contact ms. ChNrfran so$- i , ISO Kaye Estal" Dive ; a ' Tllfotson s frtt" '' /a. J00 at sPr04rl VU ' i C ton f a ?T ? ?. Application I KAR 13 2007 fyCANN1? ,G? O Fl VVr1IrKNLY) IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ? • . i A. Nature and Size of Project: ?Q? 6 X4S?DFGiL w 2 ST6?'s 1 ?x43? F.A ?dSST 4X31. k w/46' I_ lawT Post, Fi51? TIdBI.E ? t2 0004 , Q.O . _ $opcT' U ?T Square feet. e B. Variance: Yes O No 1? , Amount in variance: Length: Width Setbacks: L '• g Other: NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the nature of and need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the property owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application. V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: 1, Douglan R. Sveeler . a certified contractor, state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulation •" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with th.. attached drawings which accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock is not built in accord ce with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree to either remove t d ck or corn a deficiency. Signed: Cert. No.: C-4269 Company Name: SPEEL ENTERPRISFS = INC. Telephone No.: 172711530-4751 Address: 6111 142nd Avenue North Clearwater. ri 33760 VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner of the upland from which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above stated agent/contractor may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County. ; am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the proposed activities on either private or sovereign. owned submerged land. Date Legal Owner's Signature 1-t 0 Nam IOi1M ? r . -r I I VARIANCE 1!t PULST FORM Application N RECEIVED FAR 13 2007 (-__ (OFFICIDI qI(f W_PW?( 1 7 Left Lot Owner's Name: -you.PB A4& T CITY OF CLI Ma0ingAddrssa ?s/ SANA ?E? _<rrAric CT ?SI,Qar,??-sR Zips a 37L7 ; let, I certlfy that I am the ewes*..of,Lot which adjoins the proper! .named by the applicant who „?4; proposes to construct a Coramerclal O Multi-use O Private dock at the following address: -1L•1?? SANt? ?6t/ ESTwrES ?r ' 1;<?°. I have seen the plans, of. the proposed structure(s) with any requested variances (see Section '1V13 of Application) and therefore:: DO OBJECT O DO NOT OBJECT J? to the construction. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: // X Date ?` N yt STATE OF D , P LAS COUNTY, BEFORE MR. the undersigned authority, personally ' appeared iWtZ -.well known tome. or who provided a valid Florida. Driver's License to be the pe son who executed the foregoing instrument and that he/she acknowledged to me. under oath. that he/she signed the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes expressed therein. Witness m hand and official seal this j6A day of Notarr jbU My commission e:pkes: Right Lot Owner's Name: Mailing Address: OEERl16LJ;D1 tE1AER! woaareeaNtxsasa txrrtts: ka 21. 20M wan TM awgr terse trrw?n Zip: STATE OF FLORIDA, PINELLAS COUNTY, BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally notary PUNIC I certify that I am the owner of Lot which adjoins the property owned by the applicant who proposes to construct a Commercial O Multi-use O Private O dock at the following address: I have seen the plans of the proposed structure(s) with any requested variances (see Section IVB of Application) and therefore: DO OBJECT O DO NOT OBJECT O to the construction. OWNER'S SICINATUREs X Date NOTARY: . appeared well known to me, or who provided a valid Florida Driver's License to be the person, who executed the foregoing Instrument and that he/ahi acknowledged to me, under oath, that he/she signed the same treaty and voluntarily for the purposes..; expressed therein. Witness my hand cad. ot[lcial seal this day of My Commission expires: - • s ORIGINAL RECEIVED • n U KAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 ORIGINAL 1SSpm CmeNwedmr. FLD2006-11Q60-1f5ISAMXEYESTATESCTC0Afl& N Owner(s): HarborWOon&Amhw RECEIVED 1651 Sand KeyEsr sC489 VAR ? 3 2007 Clearwater:, F1 33767 TREMONE: NoPhone, FAX No Fax BMAM.NoEmarl PLANNING DEPARTMENT Representa4ve: lion Hrbbs CITY OF CLEARWATER 1651 SaadKey Estates Ck Clwwatea, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: 72I5934W FAX 727-595-5396, &44A11- 1 01 cam Locatlon: 2.42 acres located at the western Umannus of Sand Key Estes Court. Ages Page: 319A ?.onmgBiaf uft EMBighDeaskyR Request: FlexibleDevelopment approval to permit the c"ns rm of as existing 1,832 sqine-Soot mo1b-= dock by the addition ofan 147 squat"bot dock for one slip on the north site with an butase, to do permitted dock width fiorn 75 percentof>h M-fooiwaterfant kitwx th (2175 fact) to 97 percent P52.5 few) and a redoes to the nxinked side (east) s farn 9667 fxtto 215 fief, under the proviso ofSection 3-60L Pnopoeed Us= Attachd &m lmp Neighborhood CleaatwaterNeWftdoods Coed Association(s): (haw, hw, F133759 P 0Box8204 TELMHON& No Phone, FAX No Fax; E-MAIL No Email Nefg)borhood SxmdK4CY Civic Association A sr Clearwatey Fl 34630 Po Box 3014 1ELS91ONEL 727-593-146Z, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIU No F.mm7 Presenter: Wayne Wells, Ply III Attendmes Induced: CjW Wayne Wells, Nei[ Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Dobedy, Jim Kel lcs Applicant: Leland Bibbs, • I%e DRC revkwed ob applicadon eris the fdbwnmg eamm os: General 1 _ No issues. Environmental- 1. 1. Pfiorto CM provide airenthicsmvey fxffie in the envkwuneutal review. 2. Provi& copies of SWFWND=&orFDEP Pemut Carps offs Penant and Submerged Land Lease p?oM the cow of on- 1. MostmoeetNFPA 303,20M edit- Chapter 4 Fire Pry -43.4¢ An waved wwN supply shall be lanvidedwithan 100ft- (305m) ofthe pier/ Ind inta.wcfm or fire department connection serving firepmeecdon systems FDC can be at the strrxdwi@e? 1008 of fim hydrant and pmovide2 M ° home valves oar ih dodu dbwwledge PRIOR to C33B 2- 11 kaxag etNFPA 303, 2000FAi>ion- (b 4 Fiac Protection 42 fir Portable Fire . Ad<aowhdge PRIOR to CDB 11 Development Review Agenda-Thursday, January 4, 2007 Page 24 llladwr Master. E WILA M D. MORRIS Marine and Aviation Deparbnent Clearwater IUiarina Director 25 Causeway Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767 tel: (727) 462-6954, ext 29 cell: (727) 224-7003 fax: (727) 462.6957 william.morris@myclearwater.com C L ? UNZS 1. ORIGINAL RECEIVE K AR PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE(? The short answer is I do not have an objection based on safe navigation for this additional dock. Tie poles ale allowed up to 1 foot of ft eldsting property fine, having a vessel moored bcyw in due to wafter depth and the comity requnvmetds for bottom clearance make this proposed dock as reasonable as it can be in the existing confined basin. I have reviewed the package supplied me regarding the dock amd I initimlly had concerns due to the pw)dmity of the boat to the adjacu trooperty, and vessel atthe adjacent property. Having been in their neighborhood on several occasions, most docks seem to have some variance applied and such seems to be the case in the adjacent property where the dock does not appear to be in the center third of the property but as you face the water, it is offto the left of center: The overall loss of boat slips county and state wide have led to increasing requests for greater density on the water for mooring vessels. Given the opportunity to have a vessel such as this moored at the "msidenW as opposed to being tradwed and launched at a local launch ramp, relieves a burden on the roadways, launch ramp and upland parking. • 1. No issues. band Rcsourc= I . No Issues. bamdscapiug: I . No issues. Parks and Reenatrom: I . No issues - construction of boat slips. Stormwater: I . No Issues. Solid waste: I . No issues. TratSc Eugineerimg: I . No Issues. Planning: Development Revidw Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 25 I . Harborage Condominium Association, Inc. is not listed with the State Division of Corporations. Recommend registering with the State. 2. Section 3-601.C3.h.I requires multi-use and commercial docks abutting single family or two-family property to be setback a minimum of one-third of the applicant's waterfront property z • width from the adjacent waterfront single family or two-family property. Staff misread this provision previously as only requiring a setback of 10 percent of the applicant's property width o i a measured at he waterfront property line. With the waterfront width being 290 feet, the correct d N setback from the east property line is 96.67 feet Need to revise the request in the application, the co IM written material that is part of the application and the site plan to include. a setback (east) C1 ? `- reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.3 feet. O z B d hi d i tb k ff i Z ase on t requirement, Sta s se ac s not supportive of the re uct on n quested. 3. Provide on the site plan the setback from the east property lice to the easternmost existing piertcatwalk of the existing dock. With the introduction of the new proposed dock, provide the revised width of slip #1. ?--- 4. Potential condition of approval: That the easternmost slip be prohibited from having a boat lift. A restrictive covenant, acceptable to the City, shall be recorded in the public records prior to the Planning Department signoff on the County permit; -5. Potential condition of approval: That the boat moored at this eastern slip be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guest of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominium; .4-6. Potential condition of approval: That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; -7. Potential condition of approval: That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; 8. Page 1 of the FLD application states the project valuation is $30,000. However, on the City of Clearwater building permit application the valuation was listed as $9,876 and on Progressive Management, Inc. letterhead for the County permit the valuation was listed as $9,876. If the correct valuation is $9,876, then revise Page I of the FLD application. 9. Based on site inspection, many of the existing boat slips on the north side are currently empty. Do all of the slip owners have boats they keep in their slips, or do unit owners buy the slips to increase the value of their units? Have all of the slips been full, driving the desire for additional slips? You have indicated that slip owners can neat their slip to other owners in the condominium. Is this being done? 10. General Applicability Criteria #2 response:' If setbacks are established to maintain compatibility with adjacent properties to avoid negative impacts, provide a revised response as to how the addition of this slip will not significantly impair the value of tile; adjacent single family property. 11. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #31Li (setbacks) response - Revise response to setback reduction from 96.67 feet to 212 feet The Community Development Code was adopted in 1999. This setback regulation may have been erroneously overlooked in 2004, but must shill be applied to this application today. 12. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3JLii (length) response - Provide a response as to HOW the proposal is meeting the requirement 13. Based on a site inspection, how will the slip owner and guests safely (from a liability standpoint) access the dodo? There is no sidewalk proposed, with steps fi?om the parking lot to the dock at the seawall level (nor is there any existing sidewalk and steps for the existing docks). There is only five feet from the tennis court fence to the seawall, including the hedge surrounding the tennis court 14. Revise Page I of the application to show parcel size (acreage) as 2.42 acres. Other. No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 2/20/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 1/11/07. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. • M w E Q w U U- U Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 26 • • i • ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • § 3-401 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE LV AX DIVISION 6. DOCYAIAARINA STANDARDS Section 3.601. Docks. A. City approval and Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority permit re- quired. No dock may be constructed, added to, or structurally altered without first obtaining ap- proval by the city and a permit from the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority. • B. City approval procedures. Review and ap- proval by the community development c oordina- tor and/or the community development board shall be required prior to the issuance of a permit from the Pinellas' County Water Navigation Con- trol Authority. Such approval shall be considered a Level One (minimum standard or flexible stan- dard approval) or a Level Two (flexible .develop- ment) approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 Divisions 3 and 4. C. New docks. • Docks, boadi}ls and service catwalks that serve single-family or two-family dwell- ings. a. Setbacks. A. dock shall be located in the center one-third of the lot or 20 feet from any property line as ex- tended into the water, whichever is less, unless the dock is proposed to be shared by adjoining properties whereupon the dock may be con- structed on the common property line provided that all other stan- dards of this division are met. Boatliffts and service catwalks shall be a minimum of ten feet from any property line extended into the wa- ter. Tie .poles shall be setback a.min imum.of one foot,from,any extended . d cv cY2 c? I- w r- 1( a aU LL zo f Supp. No. 15 . CD3:18 ORIGINAL _ 0 RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PLANNING DEPARTMENT § 3-60: • CITY OF CLEARWATER All watercraft must be contained en- and Navigation Control Authorit) tirely within the extended property permit application. In the event that lines. such statements cannot be obtained, b. Length. The length of docks and applications for deviations may be boatlifts shall not exceed 25 percent approved by the community develop- of the width of the waterway or half ment coordinator through a Level of the width of the property mea- One (flexible standard) approval pro- sured at the waterfront property line, cess based on one of the following: whichever is less. Tie poles may ex- i) The proposed dock will result tend beyond the dock provided such in no navigational conflicts and poles do not exceed 25 percent of the the length of the proposed dock width of the waterway and do not will not exceed 25 percent of constitute a navigational hazard. the width of the waterway; or c. Width. The width of docks, excluding ii) The proposed dock location boatlifts, shall not exceed 35 percent needs to be adjusted to protect of the width of the property mea- environmentally sensitive ar- sured at the waterfront property line eas; or or 50 feet, whichever is less. iii) The property configuration pre- d. Covered boatlifts. Covered boatlifts cludes the placement of a dock are permitted provided a permanent in compliance with the required and solid roof deck is constructed dimensional standards; how- with material such as asphalt shin- ever, the proposed dock will be - gles, metal, the or wood. Canvas and similar in dimensional charac- • canvas like roof materials are pro- teristics as surrounding dock hibited. Vertical sidewalls are pro- patterns. hibited on any boatlift or dock. e. Number of slips. No dock shall pro- Multi-use docks. A multi-use dock, which is any dock owned in vide more than two slips for the common or used by the residents of a multi-family develop- mooring of boats, except as house- boats may otherwise be permitted ment, condominium, cooperative apart- consistent with Chapter 33 of the ment, mobile home park or attached zero lot line development shall be permitted as City s Code of Ordinances. Slips shall be for the exclusive use of the resi- a Level One (minimum standard) use dents of the contiguous upland prop- provided such dock is less than 500 square feet in deck area and complies with the erty. Personal watercraft lifts are dimensional standards set forth in Sec- not considered to be boat slips. tion 3-601(C)(3)(h). Deviations to the di- f. Width of catwalks. Service catwalks mensional standards for multi-use docks shall not exceed three feet in width. may be reviewed and approved in accor- Deviations. The community develop- g- dance with Section 3-601.C.1.g. ment coordinator may grant devia- 3. Commercial docks. A commercial dock is tions from the requirements of this any dock, pier, or wharf, including boatlifts, section as a Level One (minimum . that is used in connection with a hotel standard) approval provided that , motel or restaurant where the slips are signed and notarized statements of not rented, leased or sold; or such facili- no objection are submitted from ad- ties used in connection with a social or jacent waterfront property owners, fraternal club or organization and used as well as signed and notarized state- only by its membership; or such facilities • ments on the Pinellas County Water constructed and maintained by the City of Supp. No. 8 CD3:19 C. 0 0 § 3-601 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Clearwater, Pinellas County or by any state or federal agency. Commercial docks shall only be permitted as a Level Two (flexible development) use, which re- quires approval by the community devel- opment board (CDB). Any. multi-use dock with a deck area -exceeding 500 square feet shall be treated- as a commercial dock: All commercial docks shall be reviewed for compliance with the following criteria. Use and compatibility. i) The proposed dock shall be sub- ordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or ne- cessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property ii) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent proper- ties and the neighborhood in general. iii) The proposed dock shall be com- patible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. Impacts on existing water recreation activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of per- sons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent water- way by uses including but not lim- ited to non-motorized boats and mo- torized boats. &N Impacts on navigation. The exist- ence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recre- ational or other public conveniences. d"? Impacts on marine environment. s? r i) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid bft" i# ft op_o VAR U3 7007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. ii) Docks shall not have an ad- verse impact upon natural ma- rine habitats, grass flats suit- able as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for produc- ing plant growth of a type use- ful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanc- tuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been de- termined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habi- tats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. `e Impacts on water quality. i) All turning basin, access chan- nels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate cir- culation and existing water depths to ensure that a mini- mum of a one foot clearance is . provided between the.. lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at mean or ordi- nary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). ii) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently exist- ing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward im- provement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. Supp. No. 8 CD3:20 • ?1RIGtl RECEIVED PAR 13 2007 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PLANNING DEPARTME90 1 • CITY OF CLEARWATER Impacts on natural resources. front property width from the i) The dock shall not have a ma- adjacent waterfront single-fam- terial adverse impact upon the ily or two-family property. conservation ofwildlife, marine ii) Length.. The length of commer- life, and other natural resources, cial and multi-use docks shall including beaches and shores, not extend from the mean high so as to be contrary to the pub- water line or seawall of the lic interest. applicant's property more than ii) The dock shall not have an ad- 75 percent of the width' of the verse impact on vegetated ar- applicant's property measured eas; vegetative, terrestrial, or at the waterfront property line. aquatic habitats critical to the lie poles may extend beyond support of listed species provid- the dock provided such poles do ing one or more of the require- not extend 25 percent of the ments to sustain their exist- width of the waterway and do ence, such as range, nesting or not constitute. a navigational feeding grounds; habitats which hazard. display biological or physical V - Uh. The width of commer- attributes which would serve to cial and multi-use docking fa- make them. rare within the con- cilities shall not exceed. 75 per- fines ofthe city; designated.pres- cent of the - width of the ervation. areas such as those applicant's property measured • identified in the comprehensive at the waterfront property line, land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding wa iv) Covered boatlifts. Covered ters or other designated preser- vation areas, and bird sanctu- a permanent and solid roof deck aries, is constructed with material such as.asphalt shingles, metal, Impacts on wetlands habitat/up- tile or wood. Canvas and can- lands. The dock shall not have a vas like roof materials are pro- material adverse affect upon the up- hibited. Vertical sidewalls are lands surrounding. prohibited" on 'any boatlift or dock. Amensional standards. 777 i) Setbacks. All commercial and v) Deviations. Deviations from the multi-use docks shall be lo- requirements ofthis.section may . cated so that no portion of such dock is closer to any property the community development line as extended into the water board in order to comply with than. -E- Ca ten percent. ofo: the the review criteria established applicant's property width mea- in sections 3-601(CX3)(a)-(g). sured at the waterfront prop- i. Publicly owned facilities. Roof struc- erty line. Multi-use private and tures shall be permitted on publicly commercial docks abutting ad- - owned boardwalks, observation plat- jacent waterfront single-family forms, elevated nature trails and or two-family property must be other such structures not intended • setback a minimum of one- for use as a dock facility however third of the applicant's water- , , vertical walls shall be prohibited. Supp. No. 6 CD3:21 0 0 § 3-601 COMMUNrff DEVELOPMENT CODE D. Existing docks and lifts and. repairs. 1. Existing docks and lifts. New boat lifts installed in previously permitted wet slips are exempt from setback standards so long as such lifts are entirely contained within the property lines as extended into the water. 2. Repairs. a. Any repair made to an existing ap- proved dock that does not extend, enlarge or substantially change the location of any portion of the dock does not require review and ap- proval by the community develop- ment coordinator however, a permit may be required by the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Con- trol Authority. If, however, such.re- pair enlarges, extends, or substan- tially changes the location of any portion of the dock, such repair shall require the review and approval by the community development coordi- nator prior to the issuance of a per- mit by the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority The review of a substantial repair shall be considered a new dock pur- suant to the standards described in this section. b. If any dock, seawall, bulkhead, pri- vate bridge, or marina falls into a state of disrepair and becomes a dan- gerous structure creating an unrea- sonable risk of bodily injury to any person who may walk thereon, such structure shall be either removed or repaired so as to conform to the requirement of this division. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6573-00, § 1, 8-3-00; Ord. No. 6795-01, § .1, 7-12-01; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 41, 42, 5-2-02) Section 3-602. Minimum elevation of sea- walls on Clearwater Harbor. The elevation of sea walls on the west shore of Clearwater Harbor or Clearwater Bay shall be not less than six feet above mean sea level. The `144 RE?ri VAR 13 2007 PLANNING- DEPARTMENT CAN CAE CLEARWATER elevation of sea walls on the east shore of Clearwater Harbor or Clearwater Bay and on the shore of the Gulf of Mexico shall be not less than six feet above man sea level. Section 3-603. * Marinas and marina facili- ties. A. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling; pumping-out, chartering, living aboard, launching; drystorage and the servicing of boats, motors and related marine equipment shall require approval in accordance with the provisions of the zoning district in which the marina or marina facility is proposed to be lo- cated. B. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential districts, no fueling or launching facil- ities shall be located within 20 feet of the residen- tial property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas after 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m. C. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump- out station holding tank shall be located over water. D. The marina shall pose no hazard or obstruc- tion to navigation, as determined by the city harbormaster. E. The marina shall not adversely affect the environment, including both onshore and offshore natural resources. F. Adequate sanitary facilities shall be pro- vided landside and a sanitary pump-out station shall be provided and shall be available to marina users 24 hours a day. G. A manatee protection plan shall be pro- vided and appropriate speed zone signs shall be posted to control boat speed for manatee protec- tion. H. Adequate spill containment areas shall be provided on the property. I. Design of the marina shall maintain exist- ing tidal flushing and aquatic circulation pat- terns. Supp. No. 6 CD3:22 9- WON" MOVED MAR 13 2007 • • C7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS J. In the event of conflict between these stan- dards and federal or state law or rules, the federal or state law or rules shall apply to the extent that these standards have been preempted; otherwise, the more B stringent regulations shall aPPl3'• Section 3404. Periodic inspections. All marinas shall be inspected to determine their condition and compliance with the mini- mum standards of this development code, with such inspections to be conducted at three-year intervals by an engineer trained in the construc- tion of such facilities. The owner of such marinas shall submit a .report -bearing the seal of such engineer to the building official demonstrating that such facilities- comply with the minimum standards set forth in this development code. Section 3-605. Minimum construction stan- dards for marinas and docks. Marinas and docks shall be constructed in such a manner that equals or betters the construction requirements for marinas docks and the dimen sional requirements of the county. DIVISION 7. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL Section 9-701. Purpose. The purpose of this division is to achieve effec- tive erosion and sediment control within the city; minimi7p the impact of land alteration, develop- ment, and construction activities on stormwater and surface water systems; maintain the hydro- logic balance of watersheds and watercourses; protect the public health, safety and welfare; and conserve wildlife and aquatic habitats. Section 3-702. Minimum criteria and design guidelines. The following erosion control standards and procedures shall apply to all development: A. Plan review. All erosion control methods to be employed during construction shall be shown on the final construction plans submitted for approval to the building Supp. No. 6 CD3:23 PLANNING DkPAR` MEN] § 3-702 CITY OF CLEARWATER official. If any land clearing or grubbing is proposed,. a permit shall be required pur- suant to Article 4, Division 13. Stabilization of denuded areas. No dis- turbed area may be left denuded, and every disturbed area must be covered by mulches such as straw, hay, filter fabric, seed and mulch, sod or other approved material to the extent necessary to cover otherwise denuded areas unless the com- munity development coordinator deter- mines that the circumstances do not re- quire such covering. Within 30 days after the final grade is .established on any por- tion of a project site, that portion of the site shall be provided with established permanent soil stabilization measures ac- cording to the original construction plan, whether by impervious surface or land- scaping. C. Protection and stabilization of soil stock- piles. Soil stockpiles shall be protected at all times by onsite drainage controls which prevent erosion of the stockpiled mate- rial. Control of dust. from such stockpiles may be required, depending upon their location and the expected length of time the stockpiles will be present. D. Protection of existing storm sewer systems. During construction, all storm sewer in- lets receiving drainage from the project shall be protected by sediment traps, such as but not necessarily-lingited to secured hay bales, sod or stone, which shall be maintained and.modified as required by construction progress and which shall be approved by the community development coordinator before installation. In no case shall sediment or debris be allowed to enter. a public right-of-way or adjacent properties in such a manner as to create a traffic hazard, a public nuisance or a threat to existing drainage ways. E. Sediment trapping measures. Sediment basins and traps; perimeter berms, filter fences, berms, sediment barriers, vegeta- tive buffers. and other measures intended to trap sediment or prevent the transport 0 0 ORIGINAL RFCFIVFD I•.??+ 3 2007 PLANNING DENARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER n U • This notce afauthorization must be cons A`u'ous ^4 .i.: k,dIs lay ed at.the site p Y :x . of :wo rk . United States Army Corps of Engineers Tampa Regulatory Office 813-840-2908 Has issued a permit to construct a five 5 slip addition to an existin dockin facilit to serve residents of an upland residential development with S ecial Conditions***. All work is located in Clearwater Harbor Section 30, Towns hi 29 South Ran e 15 East, Pinellas County. The permit has been issued to Harborage Condominium Association on November 25, 2003, and will expire on November 25, 2008. Address of Permittee: 1651 Sand Key Estate Court #72, Clearwater, Florida 33767 it Permit Number 200305182(LP-MEP ***Special Conditions*** 1 Robert M. Carpenter District Commander Colonel, U.S. Army ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 9 • • • ORIGINAL, RECEIVED k,=;R > > 7007 PLAI\INING 06PARTMENT CITY OF CLEAPWATFR 1-1 • ?--?;itea?ltad a f Jeb Bush Governor Department of • . Environmental Protection Southwest District 3804 Coconut Palm Drive Tampa. Florida 33619 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT PERMITTEE/AUTHORIZED ENTITY: John Cardosi The Harborage 1, Condominium Assn., Inc. 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct. Clearwater FL, 33767 AGENT: o NA L'C? y c i Permit/Authorization Number: Date of Issue: 'JUL 2 1 2003 r- Z G ,.t tt C V (DLLk .-a LL aW ? 0 t? Z O David B. Scruts Secretary 52-0160074-002 Expiration Date of Construction Phase:' JUL 2 1 2008 County: Pinellas Project: Construction of Three, 4' x 42' long Docking Piers to Moore 5 Vessels In Clearwater Harbor This permit is issued under the authority of Part IV of Chapter 373, f-.S., and Title 62, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The activity is not exempt from the requirement to obtain an environmental resource permit. Pursuant to Operating Agreements executed between the Department and the water management districts, as referenced in Chapter 62-113, F.A.C., the Department is responsible for reviewing and taking final agency action on this activity. This permit also constitutes a finding of consistency with Florida's Coastal Zone Management Program, as required by Section 307 of the Coastal Management Act. This permit also constitutes certification compliance with water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. As staff to the Board of Trustees, the Department has reviewed the activity`.d'escribed:below; and has determined the activity is not, on state=owned submerged.lands. Therefore, your project is exempt from the further requirements of Chapter 253,-Florida Statutes.' This permit constitutes a determination, pursuant to Section 390.0651(3)(e), F.S., that the facility is located so that it will not adversely impact Outstanding Florida Waters or Class Il waters, and will not contribute to boat traffic in a manner that will adversely impact the manatee. A copy of this authorization has also been sent io the U.S. Army Corps or Engineers (USACOE) for review. The USAC08 may require a separate permit. Failure to obtain this authorization prior to constructicn could subject you to enforcement action by that agency. You are hereby advised that authorizations also may be required by other federal, state, and local entities. This authorization does not relieve you from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. The above named permittee is hereby authorized to construct the work shown on the application and approved drawing(s), plans, and other documents attached hereto or on file with the Department and made a part hereof. This permit is subject to the limits, conditions, and locations or work shown in the attached drawinsa, and is also subject to the attached one through twenty-tine General Conditions and 37 Specific Conditions, which arc t: binding part of this permit. You are advised :o read and understand these drawings and conditions prior tic commencing the authorized activities, and to ensure the work is conducted in conformance with all the terms, conditions, and drawings. If you are utilizing a contractor, the contractor also should read and understan0 taKSa drawings and conditions prior to commencing the authorized activities. Failure to comply with au drawin p and • conditions shall constitute grounds for revocation of the permit and appropriate enforcement taetioa "Nore Protcc:ion Less Pruccss" Premed or. recrclea papef ©: ' ?L6SSS2©" T 101 9C ES S6G LPL t AXCU dE .' = 98 90W - 91 -1104 Z ce W W Z Y O Q 3 ¢° Z > c%j y, LLI C (1?W ^ LL. y0 A- • 0 0 0 PINELLAS COUNTY WATER & NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY 0315 COURT STREET, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U'j v ISSUED TO: BUCCANEER DOCK INC FOR LELAND HIBBS o ` Q 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT #16 i5 v o -+ CLEARWATER, FL 33767 p r"x z U_ 2 g V DESCRIPTION: 30-29-15-35630-000-0160 Q TO REPORT START DATE AND COMPLETION: (727) 464-3770 PERMIT NO.. M36990-06 CLERK: 1. PERMITS MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED BY THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES: FL KEN BURKE D.E.P. & U.S. ARMY C.O.E. 2. THE WATERS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PINELLAS By: COUNTY & BOCA CIEGA BAY AQUATIC Deputy Clerk PRESERVE. SPECIAL REGULATIONS EXIST THAT GOVERN THE CONSTRUC- TION WITHIN AN AQUATIC PRESERVE. DATE OF ISSUANCE: PLEASE CONTACT THE FL D.E.P. 3. THIS PERMIT IS VALID. FOR A DOCK STRUCTURE ONLY. ELECTRICAL & 03 / 17 / 2006 WATER/SEWER INSTALLATIONS WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS FROM THE APPROPRIATE (Municipal or County) BUILDING DEPARTMENT. FINAL INSPECTION: 4. THIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO A 30 DAY APPEAL PERIOD FROM DATE OF ISSUE- CHAPTER 31182, SPECIAL ACTS OF FLORIDA, 1955 AS REVISED. THIS PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. MULTI- hiH MLW J BOTTOI Profile View EA' G. Sr t.F.• I" _ I y* N • ,ftoOcaton # ?t 3? D -off (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Z 0! LM w ? lV ? Q W C9 a U aW z This project may also require a T. Q Z rova1s from the Fleri in Oout of ---i p EnrironaxtuUl PrOtsctlGn (813-744-6100) st. Plan View (applicant and adjacent docks) Nunic:Pality ?. Water and Navi Engineer's Seal and the U.S. Army Corps of Enpinuors (813.769.706Q). TOTAL SQUARE FEET NEW SQUARE FEET WATERWAY NvIDTH WATERFRONT WIDTH awvai lLWWA Vvill 'oning Approved Y OF CLEARWATE- R F'1. ?tiR!1n1G Dr.-K. 0 - ()?IDO CH APPROVED PINELLAS COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ?. M 3 -\-I -01D I FOR WILLIA!M`(V1. DAVIS, DIRECTOR 4JIJ S. [imh Chili ra.. Pr 628.; • • • • I vt ORIGINAL 'RECEIVED MAR 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 9 - 209. ov' A, Z99Z ? + OS°72'04" c ? x9.s9 G6 ' N,BG°49'. N.07"1G,'II'W 14.00' ' • EXHIBIT "A" kt ? X< (:) F f? J: C; .T. A I_. fi F: f:; f.) F2I:I 5 ;Ic )= 00K 73?4 PAK ci 69i 15 8°)004•' 07 "E . 250.O8' SCALE: 1"= 100' 0 50' 100' 20 R : 11'15.00' - -- A' 5x$,79 . Q 155°2z'19" G :381.03' CB' N.05°0240"6. N G 3 • THE '07"W. 250.06 HARSor7aGE R : 145.00' C-f 5 513 1 5.51-56 Ay455.55 (09. 5307, Pcs150,-) - A , 150,00,00" e , Zomoo GS -5.00°55'53"W. smrHeA 6T 60;CNeg CF T146 NAK1507oC,E i 89°04'07"E . 250.08' N.17°21'10"E. 14.00• Ch u' I.- -7 Cs U L Z Q a J zO 50 W 2 concave Nor eas er y,, av ng a ra us o ee , e I .1 Northweaterly along said curve 59.92 feet, through a central angle of 16°25'36", (C.B. N. 80°51'19" W., 59.71 feet); thence leaving said curve non-tangent N. 17°21'10"E., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Easterly, having a radius of ; 195.00 feet; thence Northerly aloaq said- curve 528.79 feet through a central angle of 155°22'19", (C.B.N.05°02'40"E., 381.03 feet); thence non-tangent, N. 07°16'11" W., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southerly, having a radius of 209.00'feet; thence Easterly along said curve 29.92 feet through a central angle of 08°12'04", (C.B. N. 86°49'51"E., 29.89 feet); thence S. 89°04'07" E., 250.08 feet; thence S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, thence along the boundary of THE HARBORAGE the following courses: N. 89°04'07" W., 250,08 feet to a curve concave Easterly: having a radius of 145.00 feet; thence Southerly along said curve-455.53 feet, through a central angle of 180°00'00", (C.B. S.00°55'53"W., 290.00 feet); thence S. 89°04'07" E., 250.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 5UBMERGED LAN 17 250.08 N 89°04'07"W. rA t? 8 4 k k b N- I i.? P 8I ???I?cHSG?? ?I N ? =P06 irl 80 8 Ui R zo9.00 A, 599Z'?^/' A + 16°25'3G" 0 • 59.71' C6, N.80°51'!9"W Submerged land being that portion of the Northeast h- of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southeast corner of THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, Condominium Plat Book 58, Pages 51-56, also described in O.R. Book 5307, Page 1506, thence along the extension of the East line of THE HARBORAGE S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet; thence leaving.-said line N. 89°04'07" W., 250.08 feet to a curve th t 1 h i di £ 209 00 f t th --- Containing 2.89 acres more or less. 10 -18-90 DATE CUMBEY & FAIR INC. ® A PROPOSED DEDICATION OF CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEEERS SUBMERGED LANDS FOR 1403 ENTERPRIBE ROAD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34623 THE HARBORAGE SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, ALE I" = 100 DASD to - 1 T •110 OR LAG CMK VT(- JOB HO. OIoj2 PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICIAL. RECORDS - - BOOK 7:394 PAGE 766 EXHIBIT "A" •1 r Z ? W W Q G_ N W J Submerged land being that portion of the Northeast h of Section 4 Z I;- co __-j ts 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida U ' ,,_ being more particularly described as follows: 0 Z 0 A CONDOMINIUM r of THE HARBORAGE B i t th S th t , , eas corne n a e ou eg U Condominium Plat Book 58., Pages 51-56, also described in O.R. a Book 5307, Page 1506, thence along the extension of the East line of THE HARBORAGE S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet; thence leaving said line N. 89°04'07" W., 250.06 feet to a curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of'209.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve 59.92 feet, through a central angle of 16°25'36", (C.B. N. 80°51'19" W.,, 59.71 feet);. thence leaving said curve non-tangent N. 17°21'10"E., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 195.00 feet; thence Northerly along said curve 528.79 feet through a central angle of 155°22'19", (C.B.N.05°02'40"E., 381.03 feet); thence non-tangent, N. 07°16'11" W., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southerly, having a radius of 209.00'feet; thence Easterly along said. curve 29.92.feet through a central angle of 08°12'04", (C.B. N. 86°49'51"E., 29.89 feet); thence S. 89°04.'07" E., 250.08 feet; thence S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said • THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, thence along the boundary of THE HARBORAGE the following courses: N. 89°04'07" W., 250,08 feet to a curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 145.00 feet; thence Southerly along said curve 455.53 feet, through a central angle of 180°00'00", (C.B. S.00°55'53"W., 29.0.00 feet); thence S. 89°04'07" E., 250.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2.89 acres more or less. 0 • Form 1130 Florida PARTIAL RELEASE OF MO?E. ; (By Corporation.) . O F F'I. C a. Ai.. ' CJ ?'{ j I S * R<){( c ___VIiC1OK a-59 H'r1CiC= 7e5;3 That. THE CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, a corporation ortanized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida Z CY L" LU the holder of the mortgage executed by MARDEN ENTERPRISES, INC.' to THE CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA dated 6/13/90 and recorded in Offleial Records Book 7302Page 749 of the public ° M records of Pinellas County, Florida, in consideration of hereby, on this 25th daze of September 19 90 releases from the lien of Li- t hat mortgage the real property in that county described as: O fV r -- Z O SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF F 3 O 14 m 4 U 4 ?.3 L 01 RfIeRU ClG RE- DS 1NT FEES NTTF REV TOTAL Id•S1U'I ? NSP ;Z RECORDING mH K ,-f ?_ •i EIIZi".?l??EU: ' RANIr ir. !. ,. .$G v 16QS;_9 i $ '•! 30 ': 5L Ec 00 - i without impairing the lien of that mortgage on the remaining part of the property j described in that morWa d,,,,THE ITIZENS AND SOUTHERN dgouthe? .......... NATIONAL BANX OF FLORIDA' (Corporate SEAL By' Seal) W= ZIts=kP d ?. Sealyd liur'r$?I? arsrnrr of: ?Ittest: Its Vice President Touuty of Pinellas I, an officer authorized to take acknowledgments of deeds accordin_d to the laws of the State of Florida , duly qualified and acting, Iierr119 (drrtifiu that Dana Grutchfield and Michael L. Haan respectively as 7PX KXRXjgXtkAsst V.P. and V.P.of theTHE CITIZENS AND SOUTH RN NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA: to me personally known, this day acknowledged before me that they executed the foregoing Partial Release of Mortgage as such ? officers of said corporation,, and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation; and 3 Nurthrr Tertifg, that I know the said persons making said ! acknowledsrnents to be the individuals described in and who executed the said Partial Release of .Mortgage. Ju 15itucso 304trleof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal at St. k Petersburg said Con-1--1 and State, thi, 2St"h a;zy of September , .4. D. 19 90. FJ Notary Public, State of Flor s 26, 19 My Commission Expires Aug erage 4 Bonded thru Agent's Notary B My Commission EXpires J o ry Pu i ,, -------------- MAY 09 2002 11:498M H0ASERJET 3200 Law Ofte EDWARD J. AIOSA, P.A. Sugar Croak Professional Center 10236 Ulmerlon Road, Suite 5-13 Largo, Florida 33771 Fla. and NY Bar FACSIMILE COVER SHEET May 9, 2002 TO: Harborage I Condominium Assn. A'TTN: Joe Doyle FAX#: 727-596-3851 r FROM: Edward J. Aiosa E COIV MENTS: 0 P.i Z ae w u, r- n C V a co w 4X Ci U- z 0 Telephone U(727) 559-7528 Facsimile (727) 5-7593 Following is a cove of the loiter we received from the Florida Bureau of Public Land Administration dated Ma 2 2042 As indicated therein, upon re-review of the Trastcos' Deed No 17668 and the affected submerged lands, the &9e of Florida has reconsidered its claim and haA agreed to withdraw same Accordingly, the Florida Division of State Lands will be closju their nendin8 soverei" submerged land lease file Our file on this matter will also be closed. Please feel free to call the if you have ar?Y questions rt to Lhis matter. PAGES ]INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 2 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IT THIS TRANSMISSION MAY BE ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE AND IS 2MMED SOLELY FOR THE M VIDUAL OR ENTITY NAND ABOVE. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemhtation, distrQrurton or copying of this oommunkation is strictly prohibited. If you have mceived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and retwo the original message to us by mail. Thank you. MHY 09 2002 11:49AM • jeb Bush Governor May 2, 2002 Edward J. Aisoa, PA. 10225 Uitnerton Road, Suite 5-B Largo, Florida 33771 Marjory Stoneman DoygHas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Re: The Harbourage Condominium Associariom, Inc. BOT Lease No. 520030184 Dear Mr. Aiosa: The Bureau of Sumey and Mapping, Title and Land Recotds section has conducted a re-review of the submerged lands site location and the submerged hnds ownership at the subject facility. It has been determined the affected submerged hated appears to be located within the boundaries of Trustees' Decd No. • 17668. Therefore this letter is to advise you that a sovereignty submerged land lease from the Board of TmAcca of the Intemal That Fund will not be required and we are closing the pending soverei" submerged land lease file. Should the Harbourage Condominium Association decide to conduct any a tivities outside of the boundary of the Trustees' Deed, which would then be on stau owned submmrged lands, they would be required to apply for both proprietary authorization and a regulatory permit from the Deparownt of Environmental Protection, Southwest District Office at 3804 Coconut Palm Drive, Tampa, Florida 343619. Should you have arq questions pertaining to this natter, you may contact me at the letterhead address (Mal Station 125) or at (850) 488-2297. Sincere , Acey L, on. OMCM Bureau of Public Land Administration Division of State Lands /msj cc: Accounting The Harbourage CondommitunAssociation, Inc. • "More Prorection, Less Process" Mmad on req%*d pdW. HOASERJET 3200 • Department of Environmental Protection p.2 David L Struhs Secretary N ? V 0? ? W W H R3 a Z t1- O z? g ) 9 0 0 ti ti ?Q (? pia Q'3 U` Qi ZQ L ? u • C: wit: EXHIBIT "A- I" • U& -,? 0! viuu? 1 0 `:t 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION E (a) That part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida lying within the following described boundaries to Note: Parcel 4A Less Parcel 2-n.2 (2) contains 7.28 acres more or less. P i f Sion 30, Townshi 29 South, Rane 15 Commence at the Nortoheast corner a neCbased on Pinella pCounty Grid System) W. ( 9 East; thence run N. 89 04 07" 2293.44 feet along the Nortof theaS 3fl°58'd20'SWt , i 1163701 feet apo i tsaif intersection with the centerline poi centerline to a point; thence ruright-of-.way 89 ?101ine of5 Gu?f f8ouleva d P thence intersection with the Easterly continue S.89°04'07" E., 879.66 feet to the Point of Beginning; conOt78 feet thence S. 89 ° 041071E., 36.50 feet to a point; thence run S. 31o58'20" W., 7. to a oint thence run N. 00055'33" E., 60.64 feet to the Point of Beginning. Commence at the Northeast corner of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; thence run N. 890 04'07" W. (bearing based on Pinellas County Grid System) 2293.44 feet along the North boundary of said Section 30 to a point of intersection with the centerline of the South approach to the bridge across Clearwater Pass (Gulf Boulevard); thence run S. 31°58'20" W., 116.71 feet along said centerline to a point; thence run S. 89°04'07" E., 58.86 f 06 fo Estthg Point way line of Gulf Boulevard; thence run S. 89°04'07" E., of Beg.inning of herein described parcel; continue thence S. 89'04107" E., 298.51 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 170 feet; thence run Southeasterly along the arc of said curve 3°46.92??feet through a central angle of 1 16°55'22" (ch.289.78 feet, ch. br. S. 30 36 22 E.) to the end of said curve; thence run S. 27°51'22" W., 658.35 feet to the beginning of a curve west rly concave to the Northeast 4having a 55 60 feet through ascentral feet; hangle ofn180°00 00" (ch 11 along the arc of said id cu 290 feet, ch. br. N. 62°08'38"W.of tatcurvedconof said cave to the Southwest2havin'g2a E., 381.35 feet to the beginning 10 radius of 50 feet; thence run Northwesterly (ch along 85 23 feet, ch. br? N r 30 36?2024' feet through a central angle of 1 16 55 feet to a point, W.) to the end of said curve; thence run N. 89°04'07" W., 21. thence run N. 00°55'53" E., 290 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 7.30 acres more or less. LESS and except "Parcel 2ownshi", described 9 South,Range 15 EastTPinelplastCountye Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 2 Florida, lying within the following described boundaries, to wit: 0 U O The part of the Northeast 1 /4 of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida lying within the following described boundaries to wit: Commence at the Northeast corner of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; thence run N. 89°04'07" W. (bearings based on Pinellas County Grid System) 2293.44 feet along the North boundary of said Section 30, to a point of intersection with the centerline of the South apgroach to the bridge across Clearwater Pass (Gulf Boulevard); thence run S. 31 58'20" W., 116.71 feet along said centerline to a point; thence run S. 89°04'07" E., 58.36 feet to a point of intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of Gulf Boulevard; continue thence S. 89°04'0 7" E., 518.16 feet to a point; thence S. 00°55'53" W., 290.00 feet to a point; thence run N. 89004'07" W., 166.51 feet to a beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence run Southeasterly along the arc of said curve 102.04 feet through a central angle of 116 0 55'29" (ch. 85.23 feet, ch. br. S. 30036'22" E.) to the end of said curve; thence run S. 27°51'22" W., 260.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence run Southwesterly along the arc of said curve 55.04 feet through a central angle of 63°0431" (ch. 52.31 feet, ch. br. S. 59°23'37" W.) to the end of said curve; thence run N. 89°04'07" W., 84.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel; thence run S. 00055153" W., 290.00 feet to a' point; thence run N. 89°04'07" W., 250.08 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the East having a radius of 145.00 feet; thence run Northerly along the arc of said curve 455.60 feet through a central angle of 180°00'00" (ch. 290.00 feet, ch. br. N. 00°55'53" E.) to the end of said curve; thence run S. 89°04'07" E., 250.08 feet to the Point of Beginning. containing 2.42 acres more or less is t- zM 1? O W W F- ? iV Vn a Q W LJ7 .--I ` A A C?. a < ZLL p Z? E • • w U C? LU r? 0 0 N CY3 t--1 I- Z w w Z z `S R w U LQ R BORA GS I OWM ERIS 1, 15 cVE A kAR 13 2007 PLANNING 5ueet 2 JAIME CAMACHO.& CHRISTINA i i 3 'ANTHONY & CYNTHIA L. PR18W 4 ; THOMAS A BUSH 6: THOMAS SHANNON j 6 LELAND L.& ANNE A HIBBS 7 ? CHRISTOPHER V. KALIL 8 ,GLORIA SHARP 1 ;LISA A_TRAFFICANTE ..... . 2.a THOMAS & ANN CORNHOFF KATINA_CATSICHTIS i !4' CHRIS & GEORGIA CHRISTOPHER . 05 SANTIS & PAMELA SQUITIRO !6 CHARLES P. & JOYCE A. GREELEY. . 7WICHAEL LYDON/GREG ANDREWS S ;.FRANK & JUDY BARROQUEIRO. ?.. 11 ! WILFRED & KATHLEEN DOWLING 12 :•ROBERT_E. OLDEN_...._.._, . 13 SCHUYLER & DOROTHY BORST 14 `LORA L. STOPPER. & ALBERT & INA L5, CHARLES & CLAIRE.BAMBERGER .... _' 'DONALD & RITA MOELLER ... i I ISTJOZEF, MHILL & PREK ,1 lw_iCLiW D. & DAWN.M .1 ;WILLIAM & HELEN WILTON =CHARLES & SANDRA FOWLER i DR. & MRS. ZOUHAIR YASSINE. JEAN DYSON ; BOYCE 0. CROWE, SR. DONALD M._& LINDA J. FAIR LIVING ,. ', CARA A WALSH & AMY L. STEWART ,JOHN. E. & DESPINA.S. KANTOUNIS KOSTA &. FOTINI BAKKALAPULO ROBERT & CAROL SAMPEY =R GINEZ :OLIVE FRANK. & BRENDA COSTA ERINE.LIZABETH KATZ .. !CHRISTOPHER & SUZANNE ANCENT D. & CAROL D. SANFILIPPO :GREGORY L. & CHERI.U._BOUDREAU i WILLIAM A. &.BOBBIEG. WADE `LUCLANO VERONESI HARRY & ANN MONTEFUSCO .JOHN & JUDITH TRUFANT I JOANN MADISON ` LACHLAN. MACLEAN MARY E. FARNHAM & BILL: BENJAMIN B. SENNETT KEITH J. GLOECKL 'CARL & TAMMIEJO RUDELIA, JR. . I LOTTIE P. HAND i Z KEITH 43LOECKL i 1 JAME$ C. & BARBARA BONO GARY & PATRICIA LYONS ..... NETH &.BONNIE DOLSAK MICHAEL & SHIRLEY MCALLISTER i FURTIS MOREHOUSE & DEBORAH .. LAKE AVENUE, LLC MERF HOLDINGS, LLC . ANNE. E. VARLESE PAUL LILLIAN & SIGNE KRITSKY yVUOy ;IOJI oml,4umcI CoI^Iv_OVt.IrII _ CARROLTON _ 4444 FAIRWAY DRI 2-7973 ; TX ... _ . HOLBROOK. d-5635 A4 HAMPSHIRE CT. NY _ ; 6-0644 47525 ARBOR TRAIL NORTtMLLE M( i #15 CLEARWATER 6-63711651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT** _ FL t EARWATER * 3-1846 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT #16 CL FL _ 2-0735 .13120 COLTON LANE GAITHERSBUR ! MD 5-3210 A 65i SAND KEY ESTATES CT- , CLEARWATER I _ FL _ CT., #21 . CLEARWATER 5-4050 ! 651 SAND KEY ESTATES I ;f . . PALATINE E: FAWN LAWN, UNIT B 7-1798 495 . ;. IL F IL ., . ., . 5-2945 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT., #23': CLEARWATER 7-8347 2480 CHAMA AVENUE LOVELAND ,_ CO . 1-8749 182;1 EAGLE TRACE BLVD :PALM HARBOR ,FL 850 ;ELK RAPIDS 14-6503 P.O BOX MI . _ 2-4671 13167 COLONWA)RIVE : CLEARWATER FL 9-7528 16 BRAY COURT ' SOMERSET NJ `: . . 68231 A651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT. #31 CLEARWATER . . Ft KEY ESTATES CT., #32 !CLEARWATER SAND 6-9673 :1651 . . CONCORD . *-9566 : P.O..BOX 25d NH ; . ...... _ . i1-8499 ;5 ROBERT COURT HAWTHORNE IL 6-4840 11651 $AND KEY ESTATES CT., #X15 r CLEARWATER , FL MISS! GA. '0.0:127 :1014 ARGUS DRIVE i CN 1 . _ . ' . BURT E RD i1-6228 4759 EAST LAX ! NY . . _ _ ........ ...... OAD. OMEDO . _. R '7-7900 .204 HANGING MOSS FL _ , IB-8303 :2 SEASIDE LANE #201 BELLEAIR FL_ CT., #42 1651.. 42 1651 19 ,2583_ 47 1651 SAND ! 1 1651 1112 11 ESTATES CT, #45 'ESTATES CT., #46 ESTATE8 CT., #47 'ESTATES CT., 448' SIDE BLVD., #3 12 ' ESTATES CT.,_0i2 AN AVE. ESTATESCT,, X154 ..56........ CT.,_ ?{1 TES CT, #58 1 ES CT.,. #J61 tES CT., #62 TES CT., #E3 E LN .. _. TES CT.,T166 TES CT.,-#67 TES CT.,,ai168 TES COURT, i =ET, #200 _ ;. TES CT., #73; TES CT.. #74 _ET STE. TES CT., #76 DS. LN. _. _ _ WINDERMI ATM CT., #81.. ATES CT.-. #82 LVD... ..... ! TARPON 'Ma- _r_-9_8 ... I NA . . Dec-01 NA Ma?-85 `. 22 . . Sep 92 NA ? Apr-99 „ 28 i Sep-05 NA.. ' Apr-02 NA Dec 98 NA Jul-00 . NA Noy-02 ... NA ;Jul-04 . ._ NA May-06 16 Jun-00 28B Feb-95 : NA S1 ` e .. 25 . t J 7 ' . 9 Mar-04 ; .. 27 J Jun-02 . . NA Auo 99 = 7 _ Jan-89 ' NA . Apr-06- !- A . ov 93 N . 2q _ Jul-03 .. ._ 10 Feb-03 - NA No-02 y _ _ 14A Sep 83 . - NA OH 44313. Dec 83 _ 24 , Ja6-85 t : FL , 33767 NA _ _ t : FL 33767 ; Dec 96 ; , NA _ . Auq-M t , FL , '337- 67 NA . . 33767 ; Feb-97 t , FL . . . 5 _ Jun 98 _ , 33161 i t 4 FL NA , _ Jun-02 t FL', 33767 28A . _ IL 60630 Dec 92 4 . AUA-01 ... ._. 2 ._. Dec 96 , 34685 , 2 ; FL 1 .. . . 20 .. . . 33767 FL I : . _ 18 . . _ .. ............. . OA 30022: . NA .. FL i 33167. ,Dec-02 _ i 1.7 . t I FL ' 33767- Apr-US ; 8 t 1 FL 33767 Jul-83 NA 33767 May-w ; FL t 6 . . . VA 120120 ' . . . 19. . .... .. _ IN 46360 ` Mar-w NA . t t FL 133767 . .. 5 Mar-94 M7 t ; FL t _ . 3 . , , ., t FL 38767 I NA _.. t FL ' 33767 , Jun-82 3 1 . t , FL 1 33767 t Feb-0! i . . 14 Sep-86 ; FL 33767 ; 2 1 NA . _ t FL ,33767 Dec-82., . :NA. 33767 Nov 99..: FL 2 I . NA , . _. . . 2 FL '33767 Sep-98 . ,NA_. _ ec 9i f FL 34683 D R ' NA _ . OH 44060 2 FL 33767 ; Apr 99 26 2 L FL ; 337 67 3 Mar-01 ;.. 1 . 0.600 Oct-01 iL A . N . 34 8 6 FL 7 21 MaV-06 ; 5 4 8 ` FL 3 NIA . _ .. . FL 34688 ! Dec-82 ; . 15 2 FL: 33755 Jan-00 _.. NA ?AA1'3(1f (lnn_07 11 01,10INAI. acev l MAR 1? ?,?41 P?+,NNIN? ?`?Rw?TER C1N ©F C F?HOTC) #y 0 0 ;WGINAL RECEIVED • NR 13 2007 rr,l`liViIVV J&AKIMENI .'ITY OF CLEARWATER ?- r??- - ..-•i -ss a sL VAN'S SLT.5LANP As r t"' m J D r - . - - - • - -- - F - pm- ;AND KEY ESTI N i • r -l LJ • PHOTO #2 • • W Y'+ F?- < CV ° L ka7 LLI Z© ?V • • HP%K M0 KAVt CONDO 0 0 uous? N 1-- Z ce: cW W G Q O ° 0- w Z Z Z 0 0 • PHOTO #3 • W ? FW- ua u i w ?C) CO .7 zit 0 0 0 MR • • • • 0 sz fi ` ? i TT V r„ ., ; M rr, DD Q F- _ m m m Z 0 0 0 • PHOTO #4 • W 4i O R Q Q a U *-? 0 U ?LU C= Z© ? U a4 0 0 0 0 • • • C' ?J y ? rn Z u MAY 09 2002 11:48AM Jeb Bush Governor May 2, 2002 Edward J. Aisoa, P.A. 10225 Ulmerton Road, Suite 5-B Largo, Florida 33771 Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Re: The Harbourage Condominium Association, Inc. BOT Lease No. 520030184 Dear lt4r. Aiosa: p.2 David S. Struhs Secretary The Bureau of Survey and Mapping, Title and Land Records section has conducted a re-review of the submerged lands site location and the submerged lands ownership at the subject facility.. It has been deterrnined the affected submerged land appears to be located within the boundaries of Trustees' Deed No. 17668. Therefore this letter is to advise you that a sovereignty submerged land lease from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Trust Fund will not be required and we are closing the pending sovereignty submerged land lease file. Should the Harbourage Condominium Association decide to conduct any activities outside of the boundary of the Trustees' Deed, which would then be on state-owned submerged lands,'they would be required to apply for both proprietary authorization and a regulatory permit from the Department of Environmental Protection, Southwest District Office at 3804 Coconut Palm Drive, Tampa, Florida 343619. Should you have airy questions pertaining to this matter, you may contact me at the letterhead address QAa11 Station 125) or at (850) 488-2297. Sincere , Acey L. on, OMCM Bureau of Public Land Administration Division of State Lands /msj cc• Accounting The Harbourage Condominium Association, Inc. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2006 "More Protection, Less Process" primed on necyded poor. HPWSERJET 3200 Department of Environmental Protection PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Form 1130 Florida PARTIAL RELEASO MORTGAGE. ).. (By Corporation.)?Fa7CIAL RECORDS *?kXc n_ V-1 7:394 ___PAGE 765 ROW AD. jvpn vv --&sr j irtfolds That THE CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, a corporation orfanized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida the holder of the mortoaf'e executed by MARDEN ENTERPRISES, INC. to'THE CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA dated 6/13/90 and recorded in Official Records Book 7302Paffe 749 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, in consideration of hereby, on this 25th dazl of September 19 90 releases from the lien of that mortgage the real property in that county described as: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF II PA:: ti r;s (0.SU ORIGINAL RECEIVED DLEC 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 27051452 NSB " ,. 90e t - ? SY ...u i ` 1' h, ::J i SJ . 1 1 r. ja RE-0 DING TVEAl CHECK AMT 7" MANSE' without impairing the lien of that mortgage on the remaininj part of the property described in that morWa#a,,,,??? THE ITIZENS AND SOUTHERN ,00 4southe, "'o, . NAT I AL BANX OF FLORIDA' _ A. (Corporate 2if SEAL By: H Seal) ItsAs s t r d Vise b. ed iitrPr ' a forurP of: .fittest: Its Vice President ar of itariba Mouutg of Pinellas I, an officer authorized to tale:e a.ck77.owleddments of deeds according to the laws of the State of Florida , duly qualified and acting, Nerrhy TPrtifq that Dana Grutchfield and Michael L. Haan respectively as ft0(, i0?K7XkX(NHkAsst V.P. and V.P.of the THE CITIZENS AND SOUT NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA to 7r1e personally known, this day ackn.owledded before me that they executed the foredoind Partial Release of .Mortgage as such officers of said eorporati07, and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporati071; and J 341urtlier Tertifg, that I know the said persons making said ac1cn.ozvledd7)7.e1?,t8 to be the i7ldi,viduals described in and who executed the said Partial Release of ?l2ortda.de. .h 18ituess 311114ereof, I 7iereU.3140 set 777.1 hand and off<.ciat' seal' cat •; St. Petersburg said C and State, thisday of September , .4. U. 19 90 Notary Public, Srate of Fio;iu: ••• My commission Expires AuRus` 26, 19 Bonded thru Agent's Notary B era ;e My Commission Expires Notary Pu :RN ? EXHIBIT "A" • r" ,? R : zoo. cb A : 2°x.9 2 ?f A = 08°12'04" >?j c 3 z?.89 l? GB • N.gG°49'51"E. N.0701G'II*W 14.00' ?-? SCALE: 1"= 100' s0' 100' 20 a : 1 °15.0,x' ? - A • 528.79 A 155°22'19" G = 381.03' GB' N.05°0240"E• 0 d N.17°21'10"E. Q 14.00. *** 0FF]'(,1AL. F'E:C(:)R1:1> *** P00K 7394 F'A(3E ' 969 S 8c)° 04'07" E . 250.08' N. 8c?° 04'07 "W. 250.08' THE HAASMA6E , R :145.00' CF5 585R!75.51-5G A : 455.53 (09. 5307, Fpd•150C.) 8) e , 180.00'00 " c , z?0.oe' c8 =5.00°55'6 3W. N gQarflEA6T L'ORNEg Of THE NAReoV'&eWe ? 5 89°04'D?''.E . 250.08' 5uameRGED LAND 250.08 • W 89°04'07"W. R: ZO°1.00? A, 59.92' d ? I?°25'30" C ? 59.71' Cb = N. 80°51'19"W 3 m U1 Stn a8 N '1-Hi-*, E57A'T'U5 i? F•' ANVKE_i,I PDT GM N 8 N Submerged land being that portion of the Northeast 4-of. Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southeast corner of THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, Condominium Plat Book 58, Pages 51-56, also described in O.R. Book 5307, Page 1506, thence along the extension of the East line of THE HARBORAGE S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet; thence leaving said line N. 89°04'07" W., 250.08 feet to a curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 209.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve 59.92 feet, through a central angle of 16°25'36", (C.B. N. 80°51'19" W., 59.71 feet); thence leaving said curve non-tangent N. 17°21'10"E., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Easterly, having.a radius of 195.00 feet; t hence Nn.rtha ly 3lo.,y raid- curve- 528:79 feet through a central angle of 155°22'19", (C.B.N.05°02'40"E., 381.03 feet); thence non-tangent, N. 07°16'11" W., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southerly, having a radius of 209.00 feet; thence Easterly along said curve 29.92 feet through a central angle of 08°12'04", (C.B. N. 86°49'51"E., ORIGINAL 29.89 feet); thence S. 89004'07" E., 250.08 feet; thence RECEIVED S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, thence along the boundary of THE HARBORAGE the following courses: N. 89°04'07" W., 250,08 DEC 2006 C DEC j 2006 feet toa curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 145.00 feet; thence Southerly along said curve 455.53 feet, through PLANNING DEPARTMEN a central angle of 180°00'00", (C.B. S.00°55'53"W., 290.00 08 feet to the POINT OF 250 89°04'07" E S . ., . feet); thence CITY OFCLEARVIIATFF BEGINNING. Containing 2.89 acres more or less. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: IO ? 18 -90 DATE William L. Whitley, L. . 4325 SKETCH T SHEET 1 OF 1 C U M IB E Y & FA I R INC. A PROPOSED DEDICATION OF CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS ® SUBMERGED LANDS FOR 2463 ENTERPRISE ROAD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34623 THE HARBORAGE SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, NTY, 6CALE I" = loo' DATE, 10 17 °l0 DRAG CHKY<L JOS No. OI?j'L PMELLASCOU FLO *** OFFICIAL RECORDS *** BOOK 7394 PAGE 766 EXHIBIT "A" Submerged land being that portion of the Northeast h of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southeast corner of THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, Condominium Plat Book 58, Pages 51-56, also described in 0. R. Book 5307, Page 1506, thence along the extension of the East line of THE HARBORAGE S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet; thence leaving said line N. 89°04'07" W., 250.08 feet to a curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 209.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve 59.92 feet, through a central angle of 16°25'36", (C.B. N. 80°51'19" W., 59.71 feet); thence leaving said curve non-tangent N. 17°21'10"E., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 195.00 feet; thence Northerly along said curve 528.79 feet through a central angle of 155°22'19", (C.B.N.05°02'40"E., 381.03 feet); thence non-tangent, N. 07°16'11" W., 14.00 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southerly, having a radius of 209.00'feet; thence Easterly along said curve 29.92 feet through a central angle of 08°12'04", (C.B. N. 86°49'51"E., 29.89 feet); thence S. 89°04'07" E., 250.08 feet; thence S. 00°55'53" W., 64.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said THE HARBORAGE, A CONDOMINIUM, thence along the boundary of THE HARBORAGE the following courses: N. 89°04'07" W., 250,08 feet to a curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 145.00 feet; thence Southerly along said curve 455.53 feet, through a central angle of 180°00'00", (C.B. S.00°55'53"W., 290.00 feet); thence S. 89°04'07" E., 250.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2.89 acres more or less. ORIGINAL RECEIVED `H 1 1 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2006 /AREA I)ESCRTi'TiON PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A: parcel of subinerged land located in Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15.East, Pinellas County, Clearwater Harbour, containing 8370 square feet on the attached sketch labeled as Exhibit A and dated March 4, 1999, located immediately waterward of that upland property with the following attached legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTloty '(a) That porl of Itic Northeast 174 of Sect;cln 30, •lnwimi;r. 29 South, !tun<7.! IS East, Ainetlos Cciurtty; ?Iorirle lying Within the foiloWincr elrse•r;hctt baurulQr;l:s to Comniont:e.'ct tho .t'lor lheast, corner of Sczt;on 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; tf?e;ncc,rvn'N. 89 0410711 W, (bearing bored on Pinellas County Crid System) 2293.44`'Jiet. 'along, the; North boundary of said Sact;on 30 to o .'point of incersec'?, with .the. •centerline•of tha Sovth approach to the bridge ocross Cleorwater Poss,(Gvlf Boulevard); thenceorvn S. 31°58'20" W., 116.71 feet along sold Centerline to'o point; the:ncervn S. 39'04107" E., S8.36 leaf to East rigtit.of- way line of Gulf 8ovlGvord; thence run S. 89 04'07" E„ 879.66 leer to the Point taf.Beginning of herein described parcel; continue thence S. 89°04'07.. E., 298.56 f.ce't,` toAh'e beginning of o curve concovc to the Southwest hoving o r6dius of 170 " .''fact;-ihcncc run SouLhmsterly along the are of said curve 146.92 feet lhrou.7 t ('. cerllrol ongle of..116 SS'22" (eh.289178 feet, ch. be. S. 3036'22" E.) to the end of sold evCva; thence run S. 27051'22" W., 658.35 feet to the begint%intg of a evrve concave .tp the Northcost having a radius of 145 feel; thence run Southwesterly olorig the orc.of said curve 455.60 feet through o central angle of 180000'00" (ch. 290 feel, eh. br. N. 62008038"W.) to the end of said- curve; thence N. 27051'22" E., 381635 fact to the beginning of a curve concovc to the Southwest having o radius of 50 feet; ihcnec.run Northwesterly along the orc of said curve 102.011 feet through a'cent rol.ongte of'11605512911 (ch. 85.23 feet, ch. br. N. 30°36'22" W.) to' the. end ob'sold curve thence run N. 89°04'07" W., 21.55 feet 'to o point; thencerun.N.. 00 55153" E., 290 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 7.30 acres more or less. • ..LE55 ,ond''ezcept "Parcel 2-A2 (2)", described as follows: Thou port ol. Ihe.• :1Jotihcost l/k of Section 30, Township 29 Sovth, Ronge 15 bust, f ir•iellus Covnty, F1or!do.' lying within the following dcscr.ibcd boundaries, to wit: "Commence. of tt)c Northeast corner of Section 30, Township 29 South, Ronge I $ East;'Ihence run N. 89°04'07" W. (beorfng based orc Pinctlas County Grid System) 2293.44 ,feet olong thy. North boundary of sold Section 30 to o point of intersection' with the centerline of the S. 31°58'20" W., 116.71 feel along said centerline to o point; thence rvn S. 89004'01" E., 58.36 feet to a point of inteniectron with the. Easterly right-of-way line of Cvlf Boulevard; thence coniinv* S. 89004'07" E:, 079-66 feet to the Point of Beginning; continue thence 89004'01" E., 36.50 fact to o pd;nl'; thence run S. 31°58'20" W., 70.78 feet to a poin.I thence rvn t`1. 00°55'33" E., 60.64 feet to the Point of Beginning. Notes 1?cree! 4A Less Pcrccl 2-A2 (2) contains 7.28 acres more or less. ;''.The. port of, the Northeast. 1/4 of Section 30, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida lying within the following described boundaries to wilt Commence at thc'Northcozt corner of Section 30, Township 29 SOvth, Rongc 15 East; thence run N. 890Of1•'07".Y1. (bearings based on Pinellas County Crld System) 2293Mt.'(aet', olong the North bovndory of said Section 30, to a point of inlcr4crtion with 'the centerline of the South approach to the bridge across .:.Cfcorwofer Pass (Cult Boulevard); thence run S. 31"53,20- W., 1,16.71 feet along sold centerline 'to o point; thence' run S. 89004'07" E., 58.36 'feet to a point f intetseciion with `the Easterly right-of-woy line of Cvlf Boulevard' continue ttittncq:5. II9004-0 7" E'.-518.16 fact. to a point; thence S. 00055'5j" w., 290.00 " '.1CCt`tp p point; thence;vn N. 09004'0711 W., 166.51 feet to a bc:ginnioij of o curve concave to the Southwesl having o radius of 50.00 feet; tht nee; rwl SovthcuslSrly along.the ore of so;d curve 102.(Yfeet. through o central ongle of 1 16"55129" (ch. • 85.23 ..feet, ch.- be. - S. `30°36'22" .E.) to the end of said curva• the nee run S. 2751'22"• W., 260.82. feet to 11•4- begievting of o cvrvc concave to the Northwest ' ttovitxj'o radius Of S0,00 fact; theneti rvn Southwesterly along the orc u1. 1 it) .' curve 55.011 fact Ihrovgh o' control angle of 63004131" (ch. 52.31 feat, ch. br. S. 59023'37" W'.) to !lie end of said curve; thence run N, 09o(n'07:' W„ 84.00 loot to -the Point of Beginning of the hcrcin described parcel; ttsenca run S. 00055,531, W,, .'290.00 feet .to'o point; thence run N. 89004107.1 W., 250.012 it:ct to IN: bc9inr1;It1j 01 0' Cvrve. eoncovc to tho 90.0 hovinc) a ratd;us of 14$.00 feet; thrncC rvt)•• Nvrthcfly olon9 NIC are of quid Si.ryC 165? 60 fret trirough n central trngIlr of 100°00MY, (cit. 290.()O tt•uf, Ch. ttr. N..00 55'53" L"to the un(I of tn;r1 voirv thence. rvn $. 89°W0,0 - t, 2'10.011 feel 1'o ilia Point of Llttc)ictnint), ,c omuiiiisiq ' 2 41 tlv'tus rtturv or Icc's Attachment .A; Page `.8 of f3 '14e$ SSLL NO.- 5.200,5084' f (Lt L706 (e/ A) t AC i L 7 0 T F.- Zix Q a (9 ?W E ? Q p 0U no Q ZO Z ?U a • l l gat M m "A" Cage ar 2 ) fESfER?`l f3?'NflA?.K 17LGB AND LY A004DA RY ?? CE?S? AREA rASIEa .Ii !GG/„0/r"" Uplan61s o? Ha.rbona?e .?? 151 ?i6Z ?Q? G?57a?e5 G/&?rwa?Lf 0 a Pp S 'Oct9/k'J'bhr' a M p? nA5 In a I? "c!1/)7 la . ?abme Q M O? .-a N N 0 X m z 0 coda u Oo a ?rorn N tr ?? oQ !s' WaA Ian S oje 0 1 10?? P?c?m? ax?- (gXo' f aa'X i`9 I ,o'_38? F-\/ 14 ier-r 1 L W LO L a 0 N 2 ' % 3 ?J W Q Q Q J U ? U o? o Zo Z Zl ?U 5u-,-o' llneur e8dr- S??bne- Ct(9 cZCe7a 6ovenutty 5ubmeT&.laocQ rn ap?ol,aO-ts ?y a ? ND i senOAU- uQtc?s o? l?rbo?e. ?, 16u! 5an& ke? &Tce es, ClevLoafv Ono! wmapwm&4?m am a i t ouNDAtc?..`{ >ESt?RL'/ ? ? ?. 17bG? SAS ORIGINAL RECEIVED 00 co NOV 2 9 2006 a fl cn o PLANNING DEPARTMENT ??4 o N w Ln City 0 CLEARWATER v o c + ° z A j UP - oa cd En ORIGINAL, RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 9 S 1300 lip". w bo 00 -a o CY) Co Q4 0 N lJ W U1 q.0 .. Q, ENO x .? z U cd d a Oo a u co cn ?fl, En ro tl? S-rC-53.1z9S.at5e 0 } ?c rcCL, A ti 40 I._ y 'a / t • uI ut t(tt., tU oagtt 4C "•IrKd• trod P vC0 /?- •wotu•• tOtor o..a ?v • (n A- wNa't- mot • ;• .xwu•tu,?t, --Wr w• NOrt PARCEL, 4F Xilt•Gttla t w' . t .... o+ pq- .rs ? t.. Y . :i.ri• RUAIL sat tatlkt N ORIGINAL °0 00 0 0 0 0 RECEIVED. - co o !`1 2006 NOV 2 MO 9 PLANNING DEPARTMENT . u. W to a0. El cn z RWATER CITY OF CLEA a u eo a ? P4 / "A * -E)R 6' 0 FLD2006-11060 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT C BOAT SLIP PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ATLAS # 319A ZONING: HDR LAND USE: RH RECEIVED: 11/28/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: /1-- 4 - DPI CDB: CLWCoverSheet - r /. planning Cepar-tment r -.OD South Myrtlo Avenue earwater C!oarwater. Florida 33756 ` Telephone. 727-562-4567 Fax: 727.562-4865 J SUBMIT ORIGINAL 51C,NED6LIS .OTARIZEDAPPUCA71vN SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - PI0I115 and Bppllr.allon ere requlrecl Ic bo ce112190. slapird. +rc 'oldrJ into sots ] SUBMIT APoLICATICN FEE $ ryas o? ---- 0 --ASE 9. RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRZNT- A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202. APPLJCANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: _ -9 FAX NUMBER: 77_7 77?• L PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Litt ALL ownort on 111e Bond AGENT NAME: 1-60 MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER' ? 2 t EMAIL ADDRESS: CELL NUMBER: r7 ?g1? T 7' 4 B, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORM,\TION (Code Section 4.202.A) ?J :?HOJECT VALUATION: S PROJECT .NAME. ? !_------------- STREET ADDRESS T 7 PARCEL NUMBER(S): Z S ?cl 00/O PARCEL SIZE (&q-0 1001X PARCEL SIZE (eves): LEGAL DESCRIPTION yE rt u PROPOSED USE IS): T" 7'0,CE T Ele o:' / Zf?? 2. ET G1E F Z 7o L! ?1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: efwvLE-- 5•FE ?m ?.t/ L?Q?. ??c3r i Spal6oally Idenlrfy Jne 1equ031 tlndL,d9 nLrnbnr d UI-16 Or Squo(a 'ootnQa of non-fes4entld vse aoo auZ•,• b Q?C?f1F?T roQuo6le0 code de-a"Ons: 0.9. ?p 7 70 TO Lf'/ %D . reducbOn In requl: ed numoor of par,,,; 3p3G65. spc,=jfiC vSa. e,c.) S.?Pionnr{; Vco ?i ??^e n?{ppi:oiv. v,;,^-+N•"'ovmm.? .o.,.-V PCO Fa*?+'J'?..+W p..wp(Xf1Kt if 10) 2ri0o.ooe o?6c i pr, DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT _ DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which it is located. o SEE ??-_„/?t?IENT 1'TEM 1'E' CD?tl?d Au IZZOW. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. . SEE f???C 1??/?L? -?-TE"1? ? • ?I'?.?IJ?IG? • !???,G? . d r ? 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or'persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 44RE 04 AGryA7?1t/T 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. e- 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ?+ ?+ .}+ ORIGINAL V {V EPARTMENT prp WATER SAPlanning OepartmentWApplication FormsWevelopment revieM2006 FormsVlexible DeveloPpClj l,Fg#1 Page 2 of 7 tY Cf1 Yv fi WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) - Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is R requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail; I? E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria, ` Manual and 4-202.A.21). ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST_ BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of . Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. L3 If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ORIGINAL RECEIVED f ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Ell Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; NOV 2 9 2006 ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structureClN OF CLEARWATER ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. "i CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN' AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. S J SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location, '' fI including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ?t71/J0 TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Code Section 4-202.A) ?4 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards pe. Reduce number of spaces). ` Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ,ae„e!o ment re„iew??nna FnrrnstFiaxible Develo ment (FLD) 2006.doc - J:\h'IBnn?ng VePanmemwyyuw.,v,,, ? ........................_.._.. .---- Page 3 of 7 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): w _? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ? North arrow; _? Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _? All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _? Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ? All required setbacks; ? All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11); ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ORIGINAL Offsile elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; RECEIVED All open space areas; th berms; d NOV 2 9 2006 ear Location of all earth or water retaining walls an Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT Streets and drives (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWATER Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; SAPlanning DepanmentWpplication FormsWevelopment review\2006 FormsV-lemble ueveiopmem tr-j <-- Page 4 of 7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) `. ? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): e IAll existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y3 X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; ORIGINAL Dimensioned; RECEIVED Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); NO V NOV 2 9 2@06 Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Y2 X 11. PC N IN DEPART ENT J SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8 '/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. S:\Planning Department\Appiication Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Flexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc Page 5 of 7 ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) t- 4'," 2 9 2006 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CI?EARWATER • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ?! ¦ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping.Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If afire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA Sworn to and subscribed before me this ? div of Iota-lSrry?b C? A.D. 20 Oi ^ tome and/or by 12 1 Qh of 1101313 , who is per onally known has as -0 tx_? expires: SUZANNE SCHROEDER r1(plAy ^'}' tat e of Florida SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication FormsWevelopment review12006 Forms ?q ? 7r { OD15FAWlda?c Page'6 of 7 My comm. expires May 26, 2008 No. DD 324016 9 9 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: ?? ?TT)9Ch?lt'.?lT ?L/SToFQcy.V?S? 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ,. ee ?7TJ?Cfi?/? -;r r4ST Dom' mat A14eS) 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 11ACIAPA Cf io aA.15'5&CT ff 1014P- z! ?-/z fT M49T? d r'-7& Z 9 ?"? AW4 /1 P T -JA40 Z* 675140.0- 9::Zr5WWAr,6e 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ??'E S/vim &AAIA!gr c 7 as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), t un rsigned aut ority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Prop Own Property Owner Property Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of fPPo?t , personally appeared F' D who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/sh tg ?pQV p°o SUZANNE SCHROEDER _ Notary Public, State of Florida .? My comm. expires May 26, 2008 No. DD 324016 No Public Signature Nota My Commission Expir s: f,'[nQ.t-t/ •? 2,QU ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2006 SAPlanning DepartmenttApplication FormsWevelopment review\2006 FormslFlexible Development (FLD) 2006.dg,LANNING DEPARTMENT Page 7 of 7 CITY OF CLEARWATER HARBORAGONE LIST DF 0WNEZ5 N?•tIR 0- O D / wTwr. urst Add- D.t. Deak / Sian K 011 GERALD MAOOq 4 JULIE R HARRIS Pkar1. / PMSNM..d ohs $w / Cod. . 012 JAA:E CAM 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT 111 CLEARWATER Ft ))707 JuL06 NA 0 9 IM KTIO a CHIV6TNA DE4AATTLM (972)492-797) 4444 FAIRWAY DRIVE CARROLTON TA 33767 Mu-M NA 9 40 2M 01) ANTHONY& CYNTHIA L. FRISCO (6)1)]145235 14 HAMPSHIRE CT. HOLBROOK NY 11741 Dw01 IN 51 39 -m BUSH 014 THOMAS A (727)500-06" :7525 ARBOR TRA1l NORTIILLE MI 48187 M-85 22 11 3 4NM IVOION 015 THOMAS S)1ANM O13 016 LELANND L 6 ANNE A NBBS (727496-0771 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT., 115 CLEARWATER Fl ))707 S.P-92 NA 02 35 5NM . 017 CHRISTOP (727)523.1616 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. 015 CLEARWATER FL ))767 Apr-99 20 5a 41 am HER V. KALIL (202)302-5735 13120 COLTON LANE QVTHERSBIMG AO 20978 Sap-OS NA 7 11 ?NM 010 OLORK SWVLP (727495-1210 1051 SAND KEY'ESTATES CT.. /1e CLEARWATER FL 33787 Apr-02 NA Sa SO 94M 021 IISAA. TRAFF1CANTE (727495-/850 1051 SAM KEY ESTATES CT.. 821 CLEARWATER FL 33767 D.a90 NA 2 5 9NM 02 2 THOMAS 0 ANN CORNIOFF (727#17-1790 495 E. FAWN LAVft UM B PALATINE IL OD074 AA-M )N 55 023 RATIK CATSIORiS (727405-2945 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT„ 013 CLEMWATER Fl 37767 Now02 /NA 52 13 37 I DM 11NM ON CHRIS 6 GEORGIA CHRISTOPHER (970)06741317 2480 CHAMA AVENUE LOVELAND CO 005)0 4d 025 MARY ANIENARCIAHT (52)502-1900 4235 CAMELIA DR HOVANOO BEACH FL 31007 A AA945 IK 16 5 54 e 23 12NM M 020 CHARLES P. 0 JOYCE A GREELEY (231)2040523 P.O. BOX 050 ELK RAPIDS MI 190 13 027 MICHAEL LYDOWGREO ANDREWS (727)432.1071 3107 COLONIAL DRIVE CLEARVNTER Fl ( 33750 J-00 F.45 20B NA 15 11 2 15 NM S 028 FRAM( 0 JUDY LMUtOOUEIRO 1727)517-2580 8 DRAY COURT SOMERSET NJ 00073 Sgpl 23 57 12 1 NM 231 VAIFRED l KATHLEEN DOWLNG (727495-6231 1851 SAID KEY ESTATES CT. pt CLEARWATER FL 37767 A487 9 a 12 18NM 7 012 ROBERT E. OLDEN (777495-00n 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. 532 CLEARWWTER FL 33767 M-04 27 3 a 1 NM 44 033 SC10F/lER 0 DOROTHY BORST (003)730-9580 P.O. BOX 251 CONCORD N/ 03302 NM 034 LORA L STOPPER 4 ALBERT 4 NA FELSER (817(51-{19e 5 ROBERT COURT --T- YSE w,C O R 80047 J -02 Auo-00 HA 7 20 19 )B 19M 20M 035 CIMUES O CLARE BAMBERGEIt (727(85-4810 /631 SAID KEY ESTATES CT.. 033 CLEARYAATER Fl 11767 J-09 NA 49 10 21NM 038 JON t FRACS BROWN (905"70-0x27 1014 ARGUS DRIVE l) -0 CH L4Y2L6 Apr-00 NA 1 36 22 237 DONALD 4 RITA MOELLER (716)7SI-82n 4750 EAST LAKE RD. BURT NY 14021 Nov-93 23 at : NM 030 KRIST, JOZEF, MHII a PREK NKOLW 1:07)077-7900 204 HANGING MOSS ROAD OVIEDO Ft 12705 ALO) 10 1 23NM w1 WILLIAM D. t DAMN/ M. BRA DE)NBURG (727)2"434 2 SEASIDE LANE 1201 9ELLEAM FL 12750 F.6-23 NA 0 N 7 24NM 1M 232 LlW1 a HELEN WRTON (727)517-2100 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. 042 CLEARWATER FL 33767 N-02 IAA 17 29 25M 26M 0:3 CHARLES 6 SANDRA FOWLER (301pp45021 17903 RIVER OAR PL LAUREL .0 10701 S.P-83 NA $) :7 27 0" DR. 4 MRS. ZOIINUR YASSNE (310)8645773 486 INVERNESS RD. AKRON OH "313 0-43 24 27 M I-IWVTSON W0 (777403-1375 1851 SAM KEY ESTATES CT.. 00 CLEARWATER Ft 12767 J1ne3 NA 35 2: 53 2eM 29NM O" BOYCE D. CRONE. SR. 1727405-7774 1851 SAO KEY ESTATES CT.. "a CL&UYATER FL 33767 D-96 1" )1 26 30NM 0:7 DONALD M. 0 LINDA J. FAIR LING TRUST (7774173300 /)51 SAID KEY ESTATES CT.. M7 CLEARWATER Fl 33707 Auq-00 NA N 19 1 a" CARAA WALSH a AMY L. STEWART (727)5954µ2 1051 SAM KEY ESTATES CT.. "a CLEARVATER Fl 33167 F.607 5 23 5 3 NM 031 JON E. a Df3PIA 0. KNFTOl1NS (777)7243419 M3 COLI/TRTSOE BLVD.. b 112 CLEARWATER Fl )3761 1- NA 13 5 11NM .052 KOSTA 4 FOTN BAKKALAgAO (727493-7447 1851 SAM KEY ESTATES CT.. 052 CLEARWATER Ft 33767 )1.02 NA 10 10 :9 33NM 023 ROBERT 0 CAROL SNIFFY (77)4)1-2252 5358 N MULLIGAN AVE CHICAGO 31NM 854 OLNEII OINEZ 006 F (727423.9005 . . 1051 SAN( KEY ESTATES CT„ IS.N CLEARWATER K Fl 606)0 31767 D.a92 A.9-01 4 2 21 36 20 52 5 35NM 36NM RANK 0 BRENDA COSTA (727)705-3304 1107 SR" RD. S. PALM /ARBOR FL 31005 D-" 20 10 C 21 37NM 086 ERN 1i1L18E7H RATZ (95-)204/067 1051 SAM KEY ESTATES CT., 150 CLEAFMLATER Ft 33767 Is 3. N N 037 CHIIISTOPHIE t i SUZANNE MORETON (770),562-2621 SO WATER SHADOW LN. ALPHARETTA GA )0027 NA la 38 M 058 VONCENT D. 6 CAROL D. SANf1LIPP0 (7274963191 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. 161 CLEARWATER Fl 33767 D-02 HA 59 30 812 39M 001 GREGORY L. 0 C>IERI U. BOUDREAU 1727417-NO 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. 061 CLEARWATER Fl 33707- Apf-M 0 :2 " 30NM 092 WILLIAM A 8 BOBBIE G. WADE (727)5p69453 1851 SAID KEY ESTATES CT.. 852 CLEMVATER Ft 33707 A4-03 NA 22 B :1NM 063 LIXIA O VEROHESI pµ (727471-4331 1851 SAM KEY ESTATES CT.. 023 CLEARINATER FL 33767 Mt w a 2e 4 50 42NM 4]NM IA11RY 8 ANN MOHTEFtSCp (7274064709 14301 BATTERY RIDGE LN. CENTERVILLE VA 20120 19 )a 51 1885 085 J' OM JQVN MADISON (724)9413000 135 GOLFVIEW DR. MCMLRIRAY PA 15317 Feb05 NA :3 31 :5-M 497 lACNOAN MACLFAN (727)5056477 1051 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. /06 CLEARVATER FL 33767 5 b 22 sBNM a" MARY E FARN/W 4 BILL BARDWELL (777)623-0000 1851 SAM KEY ESTATES CT., 857 CLEARVATER FL 33707 Mu-04 3 .5 44 47M 071 BENJA AN 8 BEN/ETT (7774060623 1051 SAM KEY ESTATES CT„ 601 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 NA 25 25 40M 072 KERB J OIOECLCt (964)785-0077 1061 2A0 KEY UTATES COURT. N1 CL.FARIMTER FL 33707 A-02 13 11 Bt5 4985 . 1 1073 CARL 0 TAMMIEJO RUDELLA JR (777)491-2200 401 CLEVELAND STREET. /200 CLEARVATER FL 33767 F."I N 51 51 SOAR 74 HAND T P (7274234156 1851 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. m CLEARWATER it 33707 Sg86 NA 63 27 M 51 KE f . 73 H GLDECKL 0 (7274962230 1851 SAM KEY ESTATES CT.. 074 CLEARWATER FL 33787 D-82 HA 48 00 S2NM 1 A 070 (727)481-2200 001 n141LW0 STREET. STE. 200 CLEARWATER FL 11767 N-00 NA :6 87 53M D M E BA 1 JAMES C C. . a 0 BARBARA BOAR 077 GARY 4 PATRICIA LYONS (727)51730.1] 1051 SAM KEY ESTATES R_ 076 CLEARWATER Fl 33767 S.p96 NA 41 as 54M 079 KENNETH 4 BONNE DOLSAR (777)7313901 Z7M COLHTRY WOODS W. PALM /ARBOR FL 34023 0w91 NA 00 bat MICHAEL 6 SHIRLEY MCALLISTER (7274962112 7414 BELVEDERE DR. MENTOR 011 44080 12 26 al 58NM 42 CURTIS MOREHOUSE 6 DEBORAH BEACH (727)012700 7 NMI SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. 661 CLEARWATER Fl 33767 Apr-M 26 14 BIG 37NM 081 JER ( 27)eS2B54 1061 SAND KEY ESTATES CT.. P62 CLEARWATER FL 33767 Mar-01 1 50 813 SBM m RY JOHNSON OM (M7)9767)35 1112 BETTE LANE GLENVIEW IL 00025 Oct-01 N4 50 632 Sa RAKE AVEIIP LlC N07p0?lppl ?.O. BOX 2850 WINDERMERE Fl 34706 21 24 93 elm W5 STERE)MARS/IALLRCEVN WOJTOWKA (727)4210660 NI CHAPEt W. CANFIELD ON 44406 MSF41 17 :7 514 elm a" ANNE E. VARLESE (727)943.5223 2M3 GREY OAKS BLVD. TARPON SPRINGS Fl 34MI D.o-62 15 " M 62M 007 PAR J. A LKILAN H. KRITSKY (727)421-041 1164 BROOK ROAD CLEARWATER Fl 33755 J -00 NA 37 11 03NM 000 ALOS S. MaAVOY (962A25-1001 12620 BENT TREE RD MINETONKA IAN 55305 D-02 11 29 07 64NU * C..s i euFp,L?r c10,VA1 c%o?r/y L cs r oF1 OWAZE45 co*vyton 0 • HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION BOAT SLIP PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE and BACKGROUND November 18, 2006 DESCRIPTION: Construct one (1) additional boat slip and pier; increasing the number of existing slips from from thirty-two (32) to thirty-three (33). The new slip will be located in the northeast corner of the property as shown on Harborage drawing #111606, dated November 16, 2006. The fixed pier will measure 3'6" wide x 42'0" long and the slip size will be 21'6" wide x 61'0" long. The east tie poles will be within the slip boundry and setback from the property line 1 ft.; in accordance with City of Clearwater requirements. The use of the slip will be restricted to "In-Water Mooring" (wet slip) ...no boat lifts will be allowed. Both the pier and the slip will be constructed over submerged lands deeded to the Harborage Condo Assoc., Inc. and recorded in Book 7394, Page 969. Electrical power and water service will be installed after construction of the pier is complete. PURPOSE: This slip is needed to fulfill one of the many requests from Harborage I condo owners, who desire to have exclusive use of a slip for their boat. The Harborage Condo Assn. Inc. retains ownership of the slip, but can transfer the "Use Rights" to a condo owner for an agreed upon amount of money. The funds from the sale are deposited in the condo general fund, to be used as determined by the Board of Directors to benefit all unit owners. BACKGROUND: The Harborage Condo (also know as Harborage 1) was constructed in 1983 with 64 residential units and 28 boat slips. Over the years the Board of Directors received numerous requests from the 36 unit owners, who did not own boat slips, requesting a chance to have their own slip. (Governed by the condo documents, only unit owners can own a slip for their boat, but can rent or sell their rights to another owner). In 2003 the Board voted in favor of constructing five (5) additional boat slips ...the owners to be determined by lottery, secured by a down payment. The quanity of five (5) slips was determined after an internal committee evaluated the space available and the requirements of all of the jurisdictions having authority over the project. The Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, (including the Save the Manatee Foundation), FL Dept.of Environmental Protection, Pinellas County Environmental Management (Water & Navigation) and the Cities of Clearwater and Belleair Beach, were all consulted prior to beginning the permitting process. After approximately ten months all necessary permits were received. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2@06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION BOAT SLIP PROJECT BACKGROUND, cont'd November 18, 2006 Page 2 The approved plan called for three (3) slips to be constructed, next to the south marina (in the City of Belleair Beach) and two slips in the north marina (in the City of Clearwater). From the beginning, it was known that the eastern-most slip on the south side, next to the property line between Harborage I and The Moorings would require a variance. Belleair Beach officials indicated that they would grant the variance as long as the adjoining property owner, Brian Hickok would agree. Mr. Hickok was contacted and he agreed he would have no problem with the variance, since he had an existing pier only 2 ft. from the same property line. (Apparently an eariler Harborage I Board had agreed to allow the previous property owner to build the pier). At the mandatory Belleair Beach Variance Board hearing, Mr. Hickok reversed his previous verbal approval and objected to construction of the slip. He was joined in the objection by David Richardson, (who owns the adjacent home in the Moorings on the north side of the Harborage I property). The request for the variance was subsequently denied by Belleair Beach without an opportunity for appeal. The project continued with construction of two (2) of the three (3) slips on the Belleair Beach (south) side and the two (2) originally planned for the Clearwater (north) side. All four (4) piers and slips were completed in the summer of 2005 in accordance with all permits. The Harborage I Board agreed that, if at all possible, the 50' slip should be built, since a condo owner (who was next in-line from the original lottery), was willing to buy a slip, even if it was a wet slip with a "no-boatlift" restriction. The next step was to revise the original permits, requesting that the 5`h slip be constructed on the north side in lieu of the south side. This process which included another review by the FL Dept. of Environmental Protection, took approximately five months. All revised permits and/or approvals were obtained, including those from the FLDEP, Pinellas County Water and Navigation and the City of Clearwater. The contractor awarded the job, began the installation. Mr. David Richardson (mentioned previously, who objected to construction of the slip on the Belleair Beach side), once again objected and Clearwater issued a "Stop Order" on the installation. In accordance with the order, the project was stopped and the contractor moved his equipment off the site. This background narrative provides the history of the project and brings us to the current date. The Harborage I Board respectively requests that the City's Planning Dept. staff makes a favorable recommendation to the Variance Review Board, to grant the variance as described in the attached documents. The Board believes that no adverse consequence (to Mr. Richardson or anyone else) would be the result of constructing the proposed boat slip. Thank you for your consideration, ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ?r 0 0 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION BOAT SLIP PROJECT Responses to: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, Sec. D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS November 17, 2006 1. The size, scale and placement of the proposed wet boat slip, has been carefully designed to be in harmony with, and in character with the adjacent existing construction in the following ways. 1) The projection of the pier from the seawall, does not extend (out into the harbor) any further than the adjoining slips, both within the Harborage or the single family home in the Moorings "zero lot line" development., 2) The height of the pier above the waterline will be the same as the adjacent piers., 3) The decking will match the color and texture of the existing piers in the Harborage Marina, 4) The new slip and pier will be constructed over submerged lands deeded to the Harborage and recorded in Book 7394, Page 969, and 5) Access to the new pier via a walkway, will be contained within the Harborage property. 2. The proposed new slip cannot hinder or discourage development of adjacent land since no more vacant land is available. The value of the existing properties will not be impaired, since all available space around the harbor (other than this location) is already occupied with boat slips. The converse is true; since the value of the condo unit, whose owner will have use rights to the new slip, will increase. 3. There is no anticipated adverse affect to the health and safety of people using the pier. To improve safety, the pier will be 3'6" wide for its entire length of 42' and be constructed level with the entry and exit point at the seawall. This width allows two people to pass safely or walk hand-in-hand with a child and tow a cart or wheeled cooler to and from the boat. 4. The new slip will not impede boat traffic or contribute to congestion, since it is "in-line" with existing slips and is located in the harbor which is approximately 220' across to the other side ...as measured between the ends of the Harborage I and Isle of Sand Key slips. (See aerial photo) 5. The slip is located in a harbor which is completely "ringed" with private boat slips, either owned or with exclusive "use rights". Three condo developments; The Harborage, Isle of Sand Key, Dan's Island and the single family homes of the Moorings of Sand Key all enjoy having their boats moored next to their homes. This slip will allow one more homeowner the benefit of mooring their boat in a safe harbor at their door step. ORIGINAL RECENED NOV 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION BOAT SLIP PROJECT November 17, 2006 Page 2 6. The new slip does not create any adverse effects, since it will only be one more boat slip added to a harbor, which is now home to approximately 100 boats. As stated in item #1 above (inserts 1 & 2), the slip design and position will impose no visual impairment to the "straight-out" line-of-sight of the adjacent single family home. The "zero lot line" layout of the Moorings, has resulted in the boat slips being very close together. The addition of this slip creates no more severe visual or accoustic adverse consequence than already exists within the Moorings or the harbor. ORIGWAL RECEWED NOV 2 9 2006 PIA(VNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER it § 3-601 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Clearwater, Pinellas County or by any state or federal agency. Commercial docks shall only be permitted .as a Level Two (flexible development) use, which re- quires approval by the community devel- opment board (CDB). Any multi-use dock with a deck area exceeding 500 square feet shall be treated as a commercial dock. All commercial docks shall be reviewed for compliance with the following criteria. i) The proposed dock shall be sub- ordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or ne- cessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. ii) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent proper- ties and the neighborhood in general. iii) The proposed dock shall be com- patible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. (0 Use and compatibility. Impacts on existing water recreation activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of per- sons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent water- way by uses including but not lim- ited to non-motorized boats and mo- torized boats. injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. ii) Docks shall not have an ad- verse impact upon natural ma- rine habitats, grass flats suit- able as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for produc- ing plant growth of a type use- ful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanc- tuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been de- termined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habi- tats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. n Impacts on water quality. ?•? i) All turning basin, access chan- nels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate cir- culation and existing water depths to ensure that a mini- mum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at mean or ordi- nary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). n Impacts on navigation. The exist- ence and use of the proposed dock ryence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recre- ational or other public conveniences. Impacts on marine environment. i) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid Supp. No. 8 CD3:20 ii) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently exist- ing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward im- provement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0- EC 112 0 0 6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4 3-601 Impacts on natural resources. front property width from the not have a ma- ily adjacent waterfront single-fam- i) teri The al ad dock verse shall impact upon the or two-family property conservation of wildlife, marine ii) Length. The length of commer- life, and other natural resources, cial and multi-use docks shall including beaches and shores, not extend from the mean high so as to be contrary to the pub- water line or seawall of the lic interest, applicant's property more than ii) The dock shall not have an ad- 75 percent of the width' of the applicant's property measured verse impact on vegetated ar- at the waterfront property line. eas; vegetative, terrestrial, or Tie poles may extend beyond aquatic habitats critical to the the dock provided such poles do support of listed species provid- not extend 25 percent of the ing one or more of the require- width of the waterway and do meats to sustain their exist- not constitute. a navigational sacs, such as range, nesting or hazard. feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical Width. The width of commer- attributes which would serve to cial and multi-use docking fa- make them rare within the con- cilities shall not exceed 75 per- fines of the city; designated pres- cent of the width of the ervation areas such as those applicant's property measured identified in the comprehensive at the waterfront property line, land use plan, national wildlife iv) Covered boatlifts. Covered refuges, Florida outstanding wa- boatlifts are permitted provided ters or other designated preser- a permanent and solid roof deck vation aroas, and bird sanctu- is constructed with material areas, such as asphalt shingles, metal, O Impacts on wetlands habitat l up- tile or wood. Canvas and can- lands. The dock shall not have a vas like roof materials are pro- material adverse affect upon the up- hibited. Vertical sidewalls are lands surrounding, prohibited on any boatlift or Imensional standards. 77 dock. v) Deviations. Deviations from the i) Setbacks. All commercial and requirements of this section may multi-use docks sliall be lo- be considered and approved by cated so that no portion of such the community development clock is closer to any property board in order to comply with line as extended into the water the review criteria established than ten percent of the in sections 3-601(C)(3)(a)-4g). applicant's property width mea- sured at the waterfront prop- i. Publicly owned facilities. Roof struc- erty line. Multi-use private and tures shall be permitted on publicly commercial docks abutting ad- owned boardwalks, observation plat- jacent waterfront single-family forms, elevated nature trails and or two-family property must be other such structures not intended setback a minimum of one- for use as a dock facility, however, third of the applicant's water- vertical walls sha8 ft ff ed. RECEIVED Stapp. No. 4 CD3:21 DEC 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION BOAT SLIP PROJECT Re: FLD2006-11060 December 9, 2006 Responses to: DOCK CRITERIA of Section 3-601. Docks in accordance with: Item #3 in "Letter of Incompleteness", dated 12/4/06 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2. MULTI-USE DOCKS: This dock (pier), is the second and final phase of a project to construct three (5) new boat slips. This pier will cover 147 sqft, adding to the two previously permitted and constructed piers, which totaled 336 sgft...making the total deck area equal to: 483 sqft. Note: One of the piers is located on the south side of the property, in Belleair Beach's jurisdiction. 3. COMMERCIAL DOCKS: a) Use and compatibility: This pier will contribute to the comfort, convenience, necessity and safety of the users in the following way: The pier will be 3'6" wide for its entire length of 42' and be constructed level with the entry and exit point at the seawall. This width allows two people to pass safely or walk hand-in-hand with a child and/or tow a cart or wheeled cooler to and from the boat. The size, scale and placement of the proposed wet boat slip, has been carefully designed to be in harmony with, and in character with the adjacent existing construction in the following ways: 1) The projection of the pier from the seawall, does not extend (out into the harbor) any further than the adjoining slips, both within the Harborage or the single family home in the Moorings "zero lot line" development. 2) The height of the pier above the waterline will be the same as the adjacent piers. 3) The decking will match the color and texture of the existing piers in the Harborage Marina. 4) The new slip and pier will be constructed over submerged lands deeded to the Harborage and recorded in Book 7394, Page 969, and 5) Access to the new pier via a walkway, will be contained within the Harborage property. b) Impacts on existing water recreation activities: This slip will be located in a harbor which is completely "ringed" with private boat slips, either owned or with exclusive private "use rights". (See aerial photo). The new slip does not create any adverse effects, since it will only be one more boat slip added to a harbor, which is now home to approximately 100 boats. c) Impacts on navigation: The new slip will not impede boat traffic, contribute to congestion or have a negative impact on navigation, for the following reason: It will be "in-line" with existing slips and is located in the harbor which is approximately 220' across to the other side of the harbor, as measured between the Harborage and Isle of Sand Key slips. (See aerial photo). Note: Water and Navigation has approved the installation of this pier. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC ] 12[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION BOAT SLIP PROJECT December 9, 2006 Page 2 d) Impacts on marine environment: This project has received extensive review and all necessary permits have been issued by: a) The Army Corps of Engineers, b) The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, c) The Save the Manatee Foundation, d) The Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, e) The Pinellas Courity Environmental Management (Water and Navigation), f) The City of Clearwater and g) The City of Belleair Beach. To the best of our knowledge, all of the requirements of this section have been satisfied by all jurisdictions having authority over this project. e) Impacts on water quality: This "deep-water" harbor has been in use as a recreational boat basin, since the construction of the Isle of Sand Key condo in 1972. To our knowledge, there have been no adverse impacts on water quality and do not anticipate any as a result of this new pier and slip. f) Impacts on natural resources: There will be no known adverse impacts. None were discovered during the reviews as described in item d) above. g) Impacts on wetlands habitat / uplands: The pier will not have a material adverse affect upon the surrounding uplands, any more than the adjacent existing boat slips. The proposed construction of this one pier cannot hinder or discourage development of adjacent land, since no more vacant land is available. h) Dimensional standards: i) Setbacks: The purpose for this variance request is to obtain relief on the 10% side setback requirement, as described in the attached documents. [Based on the City's direction, we must consider the width of the waterfront property to be 290 ft (for code calculation purposes), meaning that a 29 ft setback is required. We have asked for a 7 `/2 ft. relief, resulting in a 21 `/2 ft setback]. Regarding the 1/3 (33%) setback requirement. This rule has never applied (or been enforced) in this harbor, either on the Clearwater or the Belleair Beach side of the property. ii) Length: The proposed pier will satisfy this requirement: iii) Width: This secondary purpose for the variance request is to obtain relief on the 75% rule, increasing this requirement to 87%, as described in the attached documents. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 1.12[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER +' . w e h A' .s c. m a J ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 29 2006 7 ma D KEY E? 1 A PLANNING DEPARTMEN, CITV OF CIFAPWATFp .y 0 0 1 290, (MARINA LENGTH) EXIST, SLR PIeR # ' ??B CONST VCT-D PERM r ? } RM35 3b•04 '--- -- I I I 3 15T, PIER 2.15- ® :?-, - 92 20 elf') . 190 EXIST. ORIGINAL PIERS ?v SLIFS-,:?1thrU14 W FERMITTEA IN 1980 (#M9os2o-80) END PIED 44 --? wx4?4'JZ j FINGER PIER - 2(T?9?,Q. I DoA'r 5U P* @ 80 0 01+ 02 SEAWALL r ?.. TCrrAL AKEA OF EXI51114 G I S WALKWAYS 8 32 SQir'r 2 , AREA of PR.OPOSEP PI raR =14- Sq PROPOSED NEW WET BOAT SLIP +or -'H E HAKE?O RAGE CONDO ASSN, I N C 1051 SALAD I{EY FSTAMS CT. C,LEAKWA-r5R.5L 55767 I PRM. KEN D0l.5AK. 11 1G?D(e I V5WG. 111GOG 15hee1' 1 oft EXIST FIXED WALKWAY ? PIEFS PLAN VIEW ? s 0CAL?0 `/,?a x5q,oO,A SO b0 70 PROPOSED NEW PIER (31/2 W. ,K 4-?I?; ( ums(,P99610 THE CITY OF CLI-,AKWATER gEQUIKES THAT" IW -rHE Pr-koPoseD New PIER L7>E Ar LEAsT 29` FROM THS PROPERTY L.1 WE CWKwC14 15 1o°/o ®F -rH E LENGTH OF THE MART NA THE FFEQUEST'- FOR- VAV?ANCE IS TO 12E pU C E T? V. 29 Teo 21 V2., (BY 7 vz') To ALLOW THE co N,ST;;;U c-m ott-j o?= A VSAF>LE WF--.T SL.I P. NO 5OA-r U FT W I LL. $E ALLOWED IN TH IS SL I R N SV5AcX I 1 i II PR)f=, NEW SLIP 1?1 P wRf'r ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMErJT CITY OF CLEARWATEP 1 MOORINGS HARBORAGE of KEY CONDO SAN 0 0 I ?arwater U OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section l7 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SiGNFD AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION O SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and eppliration are required to be collated, staPled, and folded into sets LI SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ J266"60 ?7, CASE #: r Loin ' o(O i 1 ",,6 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) --PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-- A. APPLICANT, PROP APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Llat ALL ewnere on the doed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: FAX NU Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562.4B65 FAX NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: /gT ?p PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acrw): n.' PARCEL SIZE (sQuere faetX LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AL-VAIt /QTJ'b?jf?M6r1/T' A".9?tC E8 __ I PROPOSED USE(S): 7-0 I-A70,eC 7-,l4cl5e •e,007- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Spectocaly Identity the request (inew" nurnhAr of units or square -- .OOU a of non-residentlal use and all _ requested code deviations: e.g. reduction In required number of - parlcing spaces. Specific use, e!c,) S S..VI3nNn9 Dep2r1merAWNicet0, Forauldenlopmonl roviewk2kd FemeV6"bN o...nom.?tL,F}Qt?gge oC DEPARTMENT Page I of? F'LAAIIVVIIVV?'1I 06 CITY OF CLEARWATER OLbSSSZObt•S :Ol 962S S5S LZL : W02Jd dTO:90 900E-9T-fYJN ORIGINAL RECEIVED EXIST. P1eK SLlps #14Ailia conlsrRVCr1~c N 2.aa?. PERtr?Ir #? ? 5 3.04 "-7 29, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C?XlST. oRIGI NAI. YeFtM iT7E? FINGER PIER 2'w x29"f. 1 -M3 I - - - - ,--- --- DOAT 5U P T" ? I i f 13 ? 11 1ta )4 I ?.? Zs Z,s ? - I 5' v 9 EW5TY PIER SEAWALL (A-'Wx9.2'9-) Y t. TarAL AKEA OF ECI5T1 NG 6'RYS 4 WALKWAYS ?,,8 32 sgPr 2 Y AREA of P'R0?05EP PIER'* 14'-7 sQ>~T' PROP05eD NEE! WET BOAT SL-.1 P +ov- I THE HAReoR?.GE CONDO ASSN. INC 1/51 SAtID KEY 6STATI'r e S GT. GL.5-ARWATr=R.FL 33 67 I DFtN; KEN D0L.5AIK. 11- Uft-00 I DWG. 111GOG 15heet i c+1 o .o WeREI 0 04- END PIED --, 3wx4?}?? ? o® a 6I a EXIST FIXED WALKWAY ? PIERS PLAN VIEW SCALE '/4" =5'0"' S 10 ?D 3o 40 SD 60 Y? PROPOSED NEW PIER ,4*41 W. T 2 # . ex 6 (FE'I?M M 3 990 THE CITY OF CLt;ARWATER t?EQUIRE,S "T"AT" IM -rH& psOPosED NEW piaR gE AT LffAST' 29' V9, OM THE PF OPE RTY LIME (W kiAC4 ?5 1o°/o OF TYH E LENGTH OE TAE MARINA) - 290, (MARINA LENGTH F 190 PIERS I ? .5UPS:kt`i-1-4ru144 IN 198D (--tkM10520-80) THE Rr=,QUEs7r-POR-»VAt;;?IANcE IS T4 REpucE 'T4H S 29' TO 2.1 5Y 71/z) To ALLOW THEY CON,STRU GT101--I o' = A USAbL'E WE`TY SLA P. NO 5OA-r U t'TW lI.,L 5E ALLOWED INTHIS SLIR ,i 1 ? II 1 ! II PROD ?NEti'W-r 5?.1 P N ,?--1' sMAM PRIOPBM LINE 1+ ?Z + HARI34?AGE + M rNO CONDO SAND KEY Clearwater Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: se %i..x 30?newus.?n DATE: FAX: 3 9 2' 2,2 ,6 S TELEPHONE: 4 L 73? FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4504 SUBJECT: MESSAGE A'?7?.?,ne ot or. . NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Ar 4 Jun. 19 2007 05:29PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 93922268 Jun.19 05:27PM 01'43 SND '04 OK I TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). i '* • 1 40 ti CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Brian Bornemann Buccaneer Dock Builders Inc. 14201 Bayshore Drive Madeira Beach, FL 33708 Re: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dear Mr. Bornemann: June 18, 2007 On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) denied the above referenced application to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of a 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side. By letter dated May 24, 2007, to Leon Hibbs with the Harborage Condo Association, Inc., we requested the tie poles installed to construct the dock/slip be removed by June 24, 2007. You have submitted a letter asserting that tie poles may be installed within one-foot of the extended property line, irrespective of any dock, allowing the creation of a slip for the mooring of a boat, utilizing gangways or other means to access the boat. We disagree with your assertion. The intent of Sections 3-601.C.1.a and 3- 601.C.3.h.11 is to allow tie poles for slips in conjunction with docks. It is our determination that the construction/installation of tie poles in of themselves independently creating slips for the mooring of boats is not permitted. The requirements of the May 24, 2007, letter is still applicable. If you have any questions, feel free to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504 or at wayne.wells@Myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael De ICP Planning Director Cc: Leon Hibbs, Harborage Condo Association, Inc. David Richardson Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority S:IPlanningDepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationslSand Key Estates Ct 1651 Harborage Dock (HDR) - DeniedlLetter to Brian Bornemann re tie pole removal 6.18.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Clearwater 0 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727562-4567 Fax: 727562-4576 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 0 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ? SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION X APPEAL TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD - RESIDENTIAL $100.00 ? APPEAL TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD - NON-RESIDENTIAL $250.00 ? APPEAL TO HEARING OFFICER $500.00 APPEAL APPLICATION Level One and Level Two Reviews (Revised 02/27/04) PLEASE TYPE UK FFUN - APPLICATION/NOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4-502.A & B) Section 4502A: An appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an appficabon/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The hearing before the Commundy Development Board stall be scheduled at the first available meeting of the Board (sufficient to provide notice under Section 4-206) and may be continued at that meeting of the Board so that the Board may receive more information, clarification, or research. The Community Development Board shall render a decision at the meting but not later than 70 days from the receipt of the notice of appeal, unless the parties by mutual consent extend the time frame for the Board's decision until a subsequent meeting. Section 4502.B: An applkmtion/natice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the City, as provided in Section 4501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be filed with the City Clerk in a form specified by the community Development Coordinator identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and accompanied by a fee as required by Section 4-202.E. The filing of an applicatioNnotice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPELLANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: B. APPEAL INFORMATION CHECK THE SPECIFIC APPEAL: Appeals to the Community Development Board ? Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by an administrative official in the administration of the Community Development Code, except for enforcement actions ? Administrative interpretations of the Community Development Code ? Level One (Flexible Standard Development and Minimum Standard) approval decisions ? Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions of the Community Development Code ? Any denials deemed to have occurred as result of the failure of the Community Development Coordinator to act within the time limits provided in this Community Development Code Appeals to a hearing officer ? Decisions of the Community Development Board regarding Level Two approvals ? Decisions of the Community Development Board regarding Level One approvals ? OTHER (as allowed by Code) ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAL (if applicable): SPECIFIC CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEALED (if applicable): DATE OF DECISION: C. BASIS OF APPEAL: Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets if necessary. D. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: SANann/ng DepartmentlAppllcaffon Fomiswevelopment rewewwppear Appncaoon zvvz-mx; fl??trrrr* r PLANNING DEPARTMENT • 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Brian Bornemann Buccaneer Dock Builders Inc. 14201 Bayshore Drive Madeira Beach, FL 33708 Re: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dear Mr. Bornemann: June 18, 2007 On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) denied the above referenced application to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of a 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side. By letter dated May 24, 2007, to Leon Hibbs with the Harborage Condo Association, Inc., we requested the tie poles installed to construct the dock/slip be removed by June 24, 2007. You have submitted a letter asserting that tie poles may be installed within one-foot of the extended property line, irrespective of any dock, allowing the creation of a slip for the mooring of a boat, utilizing gangways or other means to access the boat. We disagree with your assertion. The intent of Sections 3-601.C.1.a and 3- 601.C.3.h.ii is to allow tie poles for slips in conjunction with docks. It is our determination that the construction/installation of tie poles in of themselves independently creating slips for the mooring of boats is not permitted. The requirements of the May 24, 2007, letter is still applicable. If you have any questions, feel free to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504 or at wayLie.wells@Myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael De ICP Planning Director Cc: Leon Hibbs, Harborage Condo Association, Inc. David Richardson Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) Unactive or Finished Applications lSand Key Estates Ct 1651 Harborage Dock (HDR) - DeniedlLetter to Brian Bornemann re tie pole removal 6.18.07. doe FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:59 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Subject: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Mr. Hibbs - Attached is a letter to your marine contractor regarding removal of the tie poles. A copy of the original.is being mailed to you. Wayne Letter to Brian Bornemann re t... 1 ' BUCCANEER D* BUILDERS I jJ392 2268 p.1 Buccaneer Dock Builders Ins. Certified Contractor. 0-4284 Lkense4 Bonded & Insured 14201 Bayshore Dr. Madeira Beach, FL 33708 (727) 45541675 To Wayne Wells Subj: Plies for wet slip Wayne per our conversation some time ago you and I spoke about this and you said the only problem with this application was the dock and we have full right to put tie poles within one foot of the property line. Per section 3-601 Docks sub par C 1 a Setbacks we have the right to put the tie poles one foot from the property line. I I spoke to Neil "Thompson in regards to this and he agreed with me that this is also his understanding that we are in compliance with the city code. The owner of this slip will either use a gangway from his boat or several other options to get on and off the boat PLANNING DEPARTMENT C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Leon Hibbs 1651 Sand Key Estates Court, #16 Clearwater, FL 33767 Re: Case No. FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dear Mr. Hibbs: May 24, 2007 On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) denied the above referenced application to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of a 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side. Since the CDB denied Case No. FLD2006-11060, any tie poles previously constructed must be removed. We request these tie poles be removed by June 24, 2007. Failure to remove such tie poles by this time frame will cause enforcement action through the Code Enforcement Board and/or through the Court system. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504 or at wayne.wells a,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael De , AICP Planning Director Cc: David Richardson Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority V1 \1 J\ r s S.• IPlanning Department) CD BIFLEX (FLD) I7nactive or Finished ApplicationslSand Key Estates Ct 1651 Harborage Dock (HDR) - DeniedlLetter to L. Hibbs re removal of tie poles 5.24.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER'S r? t .;I ????eflpf y?j a+ C ITY OF C LEAR AT ER 4? POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 '%-L TES ??$ TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 ?.",. r PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 18, 2007 Mr. Leon Hibbs 1651 Sand Key Estates Court, #16 Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-11060 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dear Mr. Hibbs: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the application with the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 2.42 acres is located at the western terminus of Sand Key Estates Court; 2. That the upland portion of the subject property is developed with 64 attached dwellings (condominiums); 3. That existing docks of 1,832 square-feet on the north side of the subject property are constructed with 16 slips at an overall width of 231.5 feet (79.8 percent of the waterfront property width); 4. That on March 1, 2006, the Planning Department erroneously signed off on the Pinellas County permit to construct a 42-inch wide by 42 feet long new dock on the east side of the northern waterfront property (MIS2006-03001) at a setback of 21.5 feet to the east property line; 5. That once the error was brought to the Planning Department's attention, a Stop Work Order was issued (SW02006-10012) on October 19, 2006, to halt the dock construction; 6. That at this time only three tie poles have been partially jetted in to the submerged land adjacent to the east property line; 7. That this application has been filed to properly request approval for the construction of a 147 square- foot dock addition for one slip to the existing multi-use docks located on the north side of the property; 8. That the subject property is adjacent to existing single-family detached dwellings to the east; 9. That the width of the waterfront property line along this north side is 290 feet; 10. That, since the subject property is adjacent to single-family detached dwellings, the required setback from the east property line is a minimum of 96.67 feet (one-third of the waterfront property width); FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" N t C7 April 18, 2007 Hibbs - Page Two • 11. That the existing docks are located at a setback to the east property line of 42.5 feet, which is nonconforming to current setback requirements; 12. That the proposed dock addition length of 42 feet complies with the maximum length standard of Section 3-601.C.3.h (maximum of 217.5 feet); 13. That the existing overall dock width is 231.5 feet (79.8 percent of the waterfront property width); 14. That the overall width of the docks, including the proposed dock addition, will be 252.5 feet (87 percent of the waterfront property width), where the maximum dock width is 217.5 feet; 15. That the proposed dock addition does not comply with the setback and width standards of Section 3- 601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code; 16. That, even though the existing docks on the north side of the subject property are nonconforming to the required setbacks, the proposed dock is not in harmony with the scale and character of the adjacent single-family detached dwellings; 17. That the proposed dock is compatible with the dock pattern in this basin; and 18. That there are no sea grasses or natural marine habitats requiring the design of the docks to move closer to the east property line that would justify the reduction to the required setback or require the docks to be wider than the dimensional standards provide. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is not consistent with the commercial dock review criteria and standards as per Section 3-601.C.3 of the Community Development Code; and 2. That the development proposal is not consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code. An appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 1, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. ipcerely Michael Del*AI , P lanning Director S:l Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslSand Key Estates Ct 1651 Harborage Dock (HDR) - DeniedlSand Key Estates Ct 1651 Development Order. doc • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 5:14 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Cc: 'drichardson@ispwest.com' Subject: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Mr. Hibbs - Attached is the Development Order for the above referenced case, where the Community Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne TJ Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Devel... 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:18 AM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Staff Report for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting Mr. Hibbs - Attached is the Staff Report for Case #FLD2006-11060 for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If you would like an autographed version of the Staff Report, see me or Sherry Watkins. Should you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. Wayne Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Staff... 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 3:27 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Subject: FW: Letter of Objection FYI -----Original Message----- From: Debra Early [mai Ito: debraea rly@aatransferi nc. com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: David Richardson Subject: Letter of Objection Please see attached. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com 4/3/2007 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:35 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Letter of Opposition - Scavuzzo Leon - I have received a letter of opposition from Arlene and Louis Scavuzzo today. Please see Sherry Watkins for a copy of the letter. Wayne • 0 Wells, Wayne ' From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:24 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Dave Richardson Leon - A package of Mr. Richardson's objections was received today. I have also received a letter of opposition from Mr. & Mrs. Zoromski (can't remember if I already sent this to you). Apparently more letters of objection will be coming in. Please see Sherry Watkins for a copy of Mr. Richardson and Mr. & Mrs. Zoromski's letters. Wayne 0 Clearwater U Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Le? 1? q bs DATE: _3 130) 0'7 FAX: 9 S" - S' 3 1 b TELEPHONE: S'13- 1'64-(o FROM: Warne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4504 SUBJECT: MESSAGE: ?ve-.c Lvwx l"\ r . # t\ r3, 16 r 0w.S\c:, NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2_ i Mar. 30 2007 01:14PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME, MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95955396 Mar.30 01:13PM 01'10 SND 02 OK i TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). • 4 O ; PLANNING DEPARTMENT is CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Leon Hibbs 1651 Sand Key Estates Court, #16 Clearwater, FL 33767 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2006-11060) Dear Mr. Hibbs: March 22, 2007 Case No. FLD2006-11060 for Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601, for property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on April 17, 2007. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, W .? M. w? M. Wells, AICP Wayri Planner III S:Oanning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases)Up for the next CDBISand Key Estates Ct 1651 Harborage Dock (HDR) - 4.17.07 CDB - WWISand Key Estates Ct 1651 CDB Letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ?7 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:27 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Leon - These are the next resubmittal dates: 1. February 16, 2007, for the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting; or 2. March 15, 2007, for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. Let me know which works for you. Thanks. Wayne C: • Delk, Michael From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:08 PM To: 'bwilton c@salescenter.org' Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Case FLD2006-11060 Mr. Wilton: I have discussed this further with staff and reviewed the Community Development Code. Section 3-601 (C)(2), defines a dock owned in common or used by residents of a multi-family development as a multi- use dock. Section 3-601 (C)(3)(h), indicates that multi-use docks abutting adjacent single-family property must be set back a minimum of one-third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single-family property. This is the basis of our evaluation of the current request. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 721-562-4561 myclearwater.com HARBORAGE 1 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Clearwater, Florida 33767 Phone: 727-595-5396 To: Michael Delk, Planning Director Topic: Code Clarification --- Case # FLD2006-11060 Date: 1/30/07 From: Bill Wilton Mr Delk, Board of Directors. Bill Wilton, president Jim Bono - Chuck Greeley Leon Hibbs - Gloria Sharp We need your help in clarifying the setback rule used to determine the staff recommendation to not support our request for a setback variance in the above case. They based that decision on Section 3-601.C. 1.h.1 which requires a 1/3 setback for "single or two family" properties. In reviewing your code with our Marina committee and legal counsel, we feel our application falls within Section 3-601.C.2.h.1 for "condominiums" which requires a 10% setback. Enclosed for your convenience is a copy of their decision at their January meeting. The difference between the two code interpretations is significant. It is the difference between requesting a 96 foot variance or a 7% foot variance on 290 foot waterfront width. The original application based on the smaller variance, we felt was within reasonable request guidelines as we have supported our neighbors on this type of small variance request in the past. Your early reply is appreciated so we can bring this very important marina issue to a decision that meets your guidelines, and serves the marina needs of the residents of Harborage One. Please respond by your most convenient way. Sincerely, R, */ I Bill Wilton, President Harborage One Condominium Assn. Email ---- bwilton _salescenter.org Phone - 727-517-2100 FAX ------ 727-669-4700 A ECEWE JAN 3Q2U017 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Harborage Condominium Association, Inc. is not listed with the State Division of Corporations. Recommend registering with the State. Section 3-601.C.3.h.I requires multi-use and commercial docks abutting single family or two-family property to be setback a minimum of one-third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single family or two-family property. Staff misread this provision previously as only requiring a setback of 10 percent of the applicant's property width measured at he waterfront property line. With the waterfront width being 290 feet, the correct setback from the east property line is 96.67 feet. Need to revise the request in the application, the written material that is part of the application and the site plan to include a setback (east) reduction from 96.67.feet to21.5 •feet-3 CAasal on this setback requirement, Staff is not supportive of.the reduction requestpkT 3. Provide on the site plan the setback from the east property line to the easternmost existing pier/catwalk of the existing dock. With the introduction of the new proposed dock, provide the revised width of slip #i. 4. Potential condition of approval: That the easternmost slip be prohibited from having a boat lift. A restrictive covenant, acceptable to the City, shall be recorded in the public records prior to the Planning Department signoff on the County permit; 5. Potential condition of approval: That the boat moored at this eastern slip be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guest of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominium; 6. Potential condition of approval: That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 7. Potential condition of approval: That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; 8. Page I of the FLD application states the project valuation is $30,000. However, on the City of Clearwater building permit application the valuation was listed as $9,876 and on Progressive Management, Inc. letterhead for the County permit the valuation was listed as $9,876. If the correct valuation is $9,876, then revise Page i of the FLD application. 9. Based on site inspection, many of the existing boat slips on the north side are currently empty. Do all of the slip owners have boats they keep in their slips, or do unit owners buy the slips to increase the value of their units? Have all of the slips been full, driving the desire for additional slips? You have indicated that slip owners can rent their slip to other owners in the condominium. Is this being done? 10. General Applicability Criteria #2 response: If setbacks are established to maintain compatibility with adjacent properties to avoid negative impacts, provide a revised response as to how the addition of this slip will not significantly impair the value of the adjacent single family property. 11 . Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.i (setbacks) response - Revise response to setback reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.2 feet. The Community Development Code was adopted in 1999. This setback regulation may have been erroneously overlooked in 2004, but must still be applied to this application today. 12. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.ii (length) response - Provide a response as to HOW the proposal is meeting the requirement. 13. Based on a site inspection, how will the slip owner and guests safely (from a liability standpoint) access the dock? There is no sidewalk proposed, with steps from the parking lot to the dock at the seawall level (nor is there any existing sidewalk and steps for the existing docks). There is only five feet from the tennis court fence to the seawall, including the hedge surrounding the tennis court 14. Revise Page I of the application to show parcel size (acreage) as 2.42 acres. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 2/20/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 1/11/07. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate- Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 26 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 6:31 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Mr. Hibbs - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting at 1:55 pm on Thursday, January 4, 2007, in the Planning Department offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me or email me. Wayne draft 1.4.07 dre action agenda... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:14 PM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Subject: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Mr. Hibbs - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original is being mailed to you. Wayne letter of ,mpleteness 12.11.0 Clearwater December 11, 2006 Leon Hibbs 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct. Unit #16 Clearwater, Fl 33767 CITY OF CLE RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM VIA FAX: 727-595-5396 RE: FLD2006-11060 -- 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT COMMON -- Letter of Completeness Dear Leon Hibbs : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006711060. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on January 04, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, :Wells, 114. INa Wa. e AICP Planner III /nllor of Cmm?lmm?vcc - FI.n2n06- 11060 - 1651 ,CAN) KF. Y F. STATES CT COMMON LL 0 CITY OF CLLkRWATER arwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT e MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM December 04, 2006 Progressive Management 4151 Woodlands Parkway. Palm Harbor, Fl 34685 VIA FAX: 727-773-8740 RE: FLD2006-11060 -- 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT COMMON -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Progressive Management The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-11060. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete With the following comments. Include the street address of this property on Page 1 of the application (1651 Sand Key Estates Court). 2. Include on Page 1 of the application the parcel number for this property (30/29/15/35630/999/0010). 3. Provide responses to the dock criteria of Section 3-601.C.3.a-h (see attached). 4. Provide a survey of the upland property (one original and 14 copies). 5. Provide on the site plan a dimension of the width of the docks (from east side of the proposed dock decking to the west side of the dock decking of slip 14B). Based on the scale of the plan, it appears to be 252.5 feet wide. Code permits the width of the dock to be 75 percent of the waterfront property line (which has been indicated as 290 feet). This proposal exceeds this maximum width (calculated as 87 percent). Need to include the increase to dock width in the request. 6. Provide a benthic survey for the proposed dock. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, December 5, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, W , )d& Wa ne Wells Planner III Letter of7ncompleteness - FLD2006-11060 - 1651 SAND KEYESTATES CT COMMON 0 0 U Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Progressive Management DATE: 12/4/06 FAX: 773-8740 TELEPHONE: 773-9542 FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4504 SUBJECT: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court MESSAGE: Letter of Incompleteness attached NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2 Dec. 04 2006 09:29AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97738740 Dec.04 09:28AM 01'08 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS MENU' #t04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). '0 Email to & from D From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - Dave - 0 Richardson re tie pole compliance 5.24.07 8:31 AM 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Attached is a letter being sent out today to Leon Hibbs. You also are receiving a copy of the signed letter in the mail. I hope this meets with your approval to have an 'end" date. Wayne ---original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, may 18, 2007 7:21 AM To: wells, Wayne subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne .... we have both worked hard on this case and I appreciate your past efforts. It has been a month since the CDB denied Harborage 1's variance request. This all came about because of a permit being "issued in error" and a "stop work order" being instituted. They are the culprets here and we have been the victims all along. Can you provide me with a time line for their compliance in getting tie poles and property line extenders removed. If I know your schedule for their compliance, I'll have a better idea as to when the area should be returned to its prior condition. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- original message ------- >From wayne.Wells@myclearwater >Sent 4/19/2007 5:13:37 PM >To leonhibbs@aol.com >Cc drichardson@ispwest.com >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 >Mr. Hibbs - com[mailto:wayne.wells@myclearwater.com] Sand Key Estates Court Attached is the Development order for the above referenced case, where the community Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne <<Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Development order.doc>> Page 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:40 PM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Dave - While the CDB took action today, the Code sets out a 14 day appeal period, wherein the applicant could appeal the CDB decision. The end date of the appeal period is May 1, -2007. If they do not file an appeal, then I will request the Community Response Team (Code enforcement) or the Development Services Department to request compliance with the CDB's decision by removing the tie poles. Contact me on May 2, 2007, for the status of this case (any appeal) or need to remove the tie poles. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project WAYNE...... no fanfare ...just good preparation on your part. Congrats! I appreciate all of your good work, your candor, your responses to this amateur's many questions, your knowledge of the subject matter, your presentation skills and your willingness to involve yourself in a matter which could have brought great embarrassment to your department. Enjoyed working with a PRO. Sincerely, Dave Richardson PS.... how do we work out the matter of removal of tie poles on both sides of that proposed slip? David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/12/2007 8:21:14 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - I have received all six letters. I have sent to you via separate email the Staff Report for this case. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@Ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:58 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project 1 Wayne .... lst.... simply following up to insure that you have received all six letters. 2nd..... your report goes to the CDB today .... will I be able to see a copy of that report when I stop by your office tomorrow, Fri 13th? Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From David Richardson[ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] >Sent 4/9/2007 12:15:48 AM >To Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Wayne.... did the second package of 8 sets arrive on friday? Thanks again for your counsel re. settlement discussions ..... I'm trying to make that happen. Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden.LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- 2 .. 0 • 'C'NA4 ., i L CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: GENERAL INFORMATION: CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3- 601. CURRENT ZONING: High Density Residential (HDR) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential High (RH) Category USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (condominiums) EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: Proposed Use: Addition of 147 square feet for one slip to an existing multi-use dock for an existing condominium North: Preservation District; High Density Residential District South: City of Belleair Beach East: High Density Residential District West: Preservation District; High Density Residential District Water; Attached dwellings Water Detached dwellings Water; Attached dwellings ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.42 acres is located at the western terminus of Sand Key Estates Court. The site is developed with 64 attached dwellings (condominiums) and is horseshoe shaped with approximately 290 feet of waterfront property on the north side. The subject property is adjacent to, and one must travel through, a zero-lot-line single-family detached dwelling subdivision. There is additional waterfront property on the west side that has not been counted due to the navigation channel to obtain access to this basin on the north side. The south side of the property also has waterfront property, but is located in the City of Belleair Beach. There exists a 1,832 square-foot dock on the north side providing 16 wet slips for the April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 E3 Harborage Condominium Association, Inc. Leon Hibbs 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 1 of 6 0 0 mooring of boats as an amenity to the attached dwellings (condominiums). On March 1, 2006, the Planning Department erroneously signed off on the Pinellas County permit to construct a 42-inch wide by 42 feet long new dock on the east side of the northern waterfront property (MIS2006-03001). Once the detached dwelling owner to the east brought this error to the Planning Department's attention, a Stop Work Order was issued on October 19, 2006, to halt its construction (SW02006-10012). The applicant has filed this Flexible Development application in response to this Stop Work Order to request approval of this dock addition through the appropriate procedure. At this time only three tie poles have been partially jetted in to the submerged land adjacent to the east property line. It is noted a similar request on the east side of the south side of the subject property, also located adjacent to a waterfront single-family detached dwelling in the same subdivision, was denied by the City of Belleair Beach Board of Adjustment on March 15, 2005. There are also 16 existing slips on the south side of the subject property. Development Proposal: The development proposal consists of the construction of a 147 square-foot dock addition for one slip to the existing multi-use docks located on the north side of the property. The proposed dock will be accessed via a sidewalk along the seawall from the existing dock access. Pursuant to Section 3-601.C.2 of the Community Development Code, a multi-use dock is defined as any dock owned in common or used by the residents of a multi-family development, condominium, cooperative apartment, mobile home park or attached zero lot line development. However, pursuant to Section 3.601.C.3 of the Community Development Code, any multi-use dock with a deck area exceeding 500 square feet shall be treated as a commercial dock. Since the existing dock is 1,832 square feet and the proposed addition is 147 square feet (total of 1,979 square feet), which exceeds this threshold, the dock is treated as commercial and is subject to the relevant review criteria. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is the existing Stop Work Order mentioned above for the dock addition as an active Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. There is another Stop Work Order (SW02005-05025) still active for major remodeling of one of the condominium units without a building permit, which has no bearing on this dock application. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: With regards to setbacks, the dimensional standards criteria set forth in Section 3-601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code state that docks shall be located no closer to any property line as extended into the water than the distance equivalent to one-third of the width of the property measured along the waterfront property line when adjacent to waterfront single- family or two-family property. The property to the east of the subject property is developed with single- family detached dwellings on individual lots. The width of the waterfront property on this north side is 290 feet; therefore the proposed dock must be set back from the east property line a minimum of 96.67 feet. As proposed, the dock will be set back from the east property line only 21.5 feet. The existing dock is set back 42.5 feet from the east property line. The majority of the existing docks on the north side of the subject property were constructed in the 1980s, prior to the current regulations. If the subject property were adjacent to property other than waterfront single-family or two-family property, the required setback would only be 10 percent of the waterfront property width, which would be 29 feet. The increased dock setback when adjacent to waterfront single-family or two-family property is for the protection of the lesser intense use, similar to increased landscape buffers between lesser and more intense land uses, from a compatibility standpoint. While the existing docks are nonconforming to current setback standards, staff cannot support a further reduction to the required setback adjacent to waterfront single-family detached dwellings. There are no environmental reasons, such as the location of Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 2 of 6 mooring of boats as an amenity to the attached dwellings (condominiums). On March 1, 2006, the Planning Department erroneously signed off on the Pinellas County permit to construct a 42-inch wide by 42 feet long new dock on the east side of the northern waterfront property (MIS2006-03001). Once the detached dwelling owner to the east brought this error to the Planning Department's attention, a Stop Work Order was issued on October 19, 2006, to halt its construction (SW02006-10012). The applicant has filed this Flexible Development application in response to this Stop Work Order to request approval of this dock addition through the appropriate procedure. At this time only three tie poles have been partially jetted in to the submerged land adjacent to the east property line. It is noted a similar request on the east side of the south side of the subject property, also located adjacent to a waterfront single-family detached dwelling in the same subdivision, was denied by the City of Belleair Beach Board of Adjustment on March 15, 2005. There are also 16 existing slips on the south side of the subject property. Development Proposal: The development proposal consists of the construction of a 147 square-foot dock addition for one slip to the existing multi-use docks located on the north side of the property. The proposed dock will be accessed via a sidewalk along the seawall from the existing dock access. Pursuant to Section 3-601.C.2 of the Community Development Code, a multi-use dock is defined as any dock owned in common or used by the residents of a multi-family development, condominium, cooperative apartment, mobile home park or attached zero lot line development. However, pursuant to Section 3.601.C.3 of the Community Development Code, any multi-use dock with a deck area exceeding 500 square feet shall be treated as a commercial dock. Since the existing dock is 1,832 square feet and the proposed addition is 147 square feet (total of 1,979 square feet), which exceeds this threshold, the dock is treated as commercial and is subject to the relevant review criteria. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is the existing Stop Work Order mentioned above for the dock addition as an active Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. There is another Stop Work Order (SW02005-05025) still active for major remodeling of one of the condominium units without a building permit, which has no bearing on this dock application. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: With regards to setbacks, the dimensional standards criteria set forth in Section 3-601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code state that docks shall be located no closer to any property line as extended into the water than the distance equivalent to one-third of the width of the property measured along the waterfront property line when adjacent to waterfront single- family or two-family property. The property to the east of the subject property is developed with single- family detached dwellings on individual lots. The width of the waterfront property on this north side is 290 feet; therefore the proposed dock must be set back from the east property line a minimum of 96.67 feet. As proposed, the dock will be set back from the east property line only 21.5 feet. The existing dock is set back 42.5 feet from the east property line. The majority of the existing docks on the north side of the subject property were constructed in the 1980s, prior to the current regulations. If the subject property were adjacent to property other than waterfront single-family or two-family property, the required setback would only be 10 percent of the waterfront property width, which would be 29 feet. The increased dock setback when adjacent to waterfront single-family or two-family property is for the protection of the lesser intense use, similar to increased landscape buffers between lesser and more intense land uses, from a compatibility standpoint. While the existing docks are nonconforming to current setback standards, staff cannot support a further reduction to the required setback adjacent to waterfront single-family detached dwellings. There are no environmental reasons, such as the location of Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 2 of 6 sea grasses, forcing the docks to be located closer to the property line than what the dimensional setback standards require. With regards to length, commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line; thus the length of the dock cannot exceed 217.5 feet. As proposed, the dock has a length of 42 feet. With regards to width, the same threshold that applies to length also applies to width; therefore the width of the proposed dock cannot exceed 217.5 feet. The existing overall dock width is 231.5 feet (79.8 percent of the waterfront property width). With the proposed dock addition, the overall proposed dock width is 252.5 feet (87 percent), which is not in compliance with this standard. While the existing docks are nonconforming to current width standards, staff cannot support an increase to the maximum width of the docks, coupled with the setback reduction, when situated adjacent to waterfront single-family detached dwellings. Again, there are no environmental reasons, such as the location of sea grasses, forcing the docks to be wider than what the dimensional width standards require. The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards as per Section 3- 601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Setbacks 1/3 of the waterfront width of the East: 21.5 feet X (Minimum) subject property (96.67 feet) West: N/A Length 5% of the width of the subject 2 feet X (Maximum) property (217.5 feet) Width 5% of the width of the subject 52.5 feet (87 percent) X Maximum property 217.5 feet Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 3 of 6 • • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS (SECTION 3- 601.C.3.a-M: The development proposal has not been found to be consistent with the criteria for commercial docks. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. The individual criteria for commercial docks are set forth in the following table: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, X convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. 2. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent X properties and the neighborhood in general. 3. The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. X 4. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock N/A N/A shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. 5. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a N/A N/A detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. 6. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine N/A N/A grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. 7. Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats X suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. 8. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated X with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). 9. The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling X of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. 10. The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of N/A N/A wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. 11. The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, N/A N/A or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. 12. Impacts on Wetlands HabitatfUplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse N/A N/A affect upon the uplands surrounding. Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 4 of 6 • • The basin the proposed dock is located is ringed with boat slips for attached dwelling condominium projects and detached dwellings. The proposed dock is compatible with the dock pattern in this basin. However, even though the existing docks on the north side of the subject property are nonconforming to the required setbacks, the proposed dock is not in harmony with the scale and character of the adjacent single-family detached dwellings. There are no sea grasses or natural marine habitats requiring the design of the docks to move closer to the east property line that would justify the reduction to the required setback. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The increased setback requirement when adjacent to waterfront single-family detached dwellings is there for the protection of the lesser intense use, similar to increased landscape buffers between lesser and more intense land uses, and is thereby not in harmony with the scale and character of the adjacent property. The reduced setback will also increase the waterfront visual obstruction of the adjacent detached dwelling. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of January 4, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 2.42 acres is located at the western terminus of Sand Key Estates Court; 2. That the upland portion of the subject property is developed with 64 attached dwellings (condominiums); 3. That existing docks of 1,832 square-feet on the north side of the subject property are constructed with 16 slips at an overall width of 231.5 feet (79.8 percent of the waterfront property width); 4. That on March 1, 2006, the Planning Department erroneously signed off on the Pinellas County permit to construct a 42-inch wide by 42 feet long new dock on the east side of the northern waterfront property (MIS2006-03001) at a setback of 21.5 feet to the east property line; 5. That once the error was brought to the Planning Department's attention, a Stop Work Order was issued (SW02006-10012) on October 19, 2006, to halt the dock construction; Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 5 of 6 0 0 6. That at this time only three tie poles have been partially jetted in to the submerged land adjacent to the east property line; 7. That this application has been filed to properly request approval for the construction of a 147 square- foot dock addition for one slip to the existing multi-use docks located on the north side of the property; 8. That the subject property is adjacent to existing single-family detached dwellings to the east; 9. That the width of the waterfront property line along this north side is 290 feet; 10. That, since the subject property is adjacent to single-family detached dwellings, the required setback from the east property line is a minimum of 96.67 feet (one-third of the waterfront property width); 11. That the existing docks are located at a setback to the east property line of 42.5 feet, which is nonconforming to current setback requirements; 12. That the proposed dock addition length of 42 feet complies with the maximum length standard of Section 3-601.C.3.h (maximum of 217.5 feet); 13. That the existing overall dock width is 231.5 feet (79.8 percent of the waterfront property width); 14. That the overall width of the docks, including the proposed dock addition, will be 252.5 feet (87 percent of the waterfront property width), where the maximum dock width is 217.5 feet; 15. That the proposed dock addition does not comply with the setback and width standards of Section 3- 601.C.3.h of the Community Development Code; 16. That, even though the existing docks on the north side of the subject property are nonconforming to the required setbacks, the proposed dock is not in harmony with the scale and character of the adjacent single-family detached dwellings; 17. That the proposed dock is compatible with the dock pattern in this basin; and 18. That there are no sea grasses or natural marine habitats requiring the design of the docks to move closer to the east property line that would justify the reduction to the required setback or require the docks to be wider than the dimensional standards provide. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is not consistent with the commercial dock review criteria and standards as per Section 3-601.C.3 of the Community Development Code; and 2. That the development proposal is not consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Prepared by Planning Department Staff. 111MAL M. . le?jl" Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending caseslUp for the next CDBISand Key Estates Ct 1651 Harborage Dock (HDR) - 4.17.07 CDB - WWISand Key Estates Ct 1651 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board - April 17, 2007 FLD2006-11060 - Page 6 of 6 0 0 Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(&myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). 0 0 • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %i years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 14 Environmental Condition 0 Conditions Associated With FLD2006-11060 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT COMMON Ed Chesney 562-4742 12/13/2006 1. Provide copies of SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and Submerged Not Met Land Lease prior to the commencement of construction. Harbor Master Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 01/02/2007 The short answer is I do not have an objection based on safe navigation for this additional dock Tie poles are allowed up to 1 foot of the existing property line, having a vessel moored bow in due to water depth and the county requirements for bottom clearance make this proposed dock as reasonable as it can be in the existing confined basin. I have reviewed the package supplied me regarding the dock and I initially had concerns due to the proximity of the boat to the adjacent property, and vessel at the adjacent property. Having been in their neighborhood on several occasions, most docks seem to have some variance applied and such seems to be the case in the adjacent property where the dock does not appear to be in the center third of the property but as you face the water, it is off to the left of center. The overall loss of boat slips county and state wide have led to increasing requests for greater density on the water for mooring vessels. Given the opportunity to have a vessel such as this moored at the "residence" as opposed to being trailerred and launched at a local launch ramp, relieves a burden on the roadways, launch ramp and upland parking. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 Not Met 12/21/2006 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That the easternmost slip be prohibited from having a boat lift. A restrictive covenant, acceptable to the City, shall be recorded in the public records prior to the Planning Department signoff on the County permit; 12/21/2006 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That the boat moored at this eastern slip be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guest of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominium; 12/21/2006 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 12/21/2006 Potential condition of approval: Not Met That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; Print Date: 03/22/2007 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 z z 19?C, VA RI` Nth. DEL R EY SAND KEY E sr o,R PIN: 1 30/29/15/35630/999/0010 1 Atlas Page: I 3196 • • r; `.? Yo b •- y mono e Agar ? 4`:. . 1 1 Aerial Map Owner. Harborage Condominium Case: FLD2006-11060 Association, Inc. Site: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Property Size(Acres): 2.42 acres PIN: 30/2 9/15/35630/999/0010 Atlas Page: 319B 0 0 1 a ? 11 06 . SA KEYEWAItZiUM. P 6 HDR o. , 821Gt, 'B>o >?B rmr?fSSS 2 3 4 >B?q '; n 5 HDR 24 r 24 s >B?B 'B?> 23 22 >B >B 8. 7B3B 21 'B3 itp 11? v 20 m 0 19 18 'B3S HDR SAND 18 n n ?m 17 1 ° 18 12 13 14 m15 Zoning Map Harborage Condominium Owner. Association, Inc. Case: FLD2006-11060 Site: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Property 2.42 acres Size (Acres) : PIN: 30/29/15/35630/999/0010 Atlas Page: T 3196 • • ?s 16 a z 'so s Po 17A8 Attached SAND KEYESTATES DR. 66 dwellings 0 Attached dwellings Na- A a . 1 ? • sz? cui 4ti ? 'sso Q l`J (?I ?soe ss 21A316f 2 the 1 Y Attached 5 24' dwellings 6 23 ? L? 48 7 >B?? 22 166 g t d w 2 a ng Attached 16 19 dwellings SA ,e 18 n ?a 17 1 ?? t t6? ,? 12 +3d a >bg 9 !!It??lAl•?u?l?u •.1 -- Existing Surrounding Uses Map Harborage Condominium Owner. Case: FLD2006-11060 Association, Inc. Site: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Property 2.42 acres Size (Acres) : PIN: 30/29/15/35630/999/0010 Atlas Page: 319B ALA View looking east at proposed dock (adjacent detached dwelling boat slip in background) View looking north from subject property at docks across water 1651 Sand Key Estates Court FLD2006-11060 View lookuig E along seawall & existing dock at proposed dock (adj. detached dw. in background) TOP View looking northeast at access point for proposes dock (next to tennis court) View looking south across water at proposed dock location west of (to the right of) detached dwelling View looking northeast at docks at detached dwellings to the east/northeast of subject property Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:05 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-11060 1651 Sand Key Estates Wayne/Sherry, no planner of record and I know I have seen this one before. I still have no objection as to navigation. 1. With regard to navigation, as long as the vessel fits within the 1 foot side setback that would normally be for any tie poles I do not see it as presenting a hazard to navigation. 2. With the high demand for boat slips, I am encouraged to see neighborhoods work toward accommodating as many vessels as they safely can in their waterfront neighborhoods. This basin is well sheltered. • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: aerial.doc existing.doc Kambourolias, Sam Monday, March 26, 2007 10:37 AM Wells, Wayne FLD2006-11060 WIIHI future land use.doc location.doc Sam Kambourolias GIS Tech. (727) 562-4769 www.myclearwater.com zone.doc • • > WA TEA A 'ap E 1wa Z° SAND KEY ESTATES 66 RH WATER 1 n 62f Gu/ 1 Ra ' P 'B°8 21ADA% 2 3 4 y WATER 5 >?4 ' ' cD°p 24 24 6 8 23 7 >B3? >B fB 22 1 8 'B3B 'B2 21 110 ? >B3 1 ? 20 19 Aw RH 16 >B? SA 18 17 z ? m 16' ,2 1 a 3 ,4 `O15 i2.:; ;..•::.• .:::: •: Future Land Use Map Harborage Condominium Owner. Case: FLD2006-11060 Association, Inc. Site: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Property 2.42 acres Size(Acres): PIN: 30/29/15/35630/999/0010 Atlas Page: 3196 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 5:44 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Sam - Attached is a map request for Cases FLD2006-11060 for the property at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court. I will bring over the paperwork. I do not have a survey of the property. If you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2006-1 1060 Date Requested: March 22, 2007 Date Requested for (date): April 5, 2007 Maps Requested X? Location Map X? Aerial Map X? Zoning Map X? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering X? Legal Description X? Survey X? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Harborage Condominium Case: FLD2006-1 1060 Association, Inc. Site: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Property Property Size (Acres): 2.42 acres PIN: 30/29%15/35630/999/0010 Atlas Page: 319B AFL w . y o- p D S S L 0 j ? S GO ? , 3118 F e ;4-mnvv J u .? f ' • a _ a._ g as q. 4_ ^& a p 1 i ? . .. •e n r • • ??i ^ n0 ? z- . •. learwater .._. ... ,- I-._.._..------------............. i -- .? - -- -- -- - ---------- - -- ------ PREPARED BY i i PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION { ENGINEERING ! GIS r n; re a, e r r 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 $ ii a n D 3 C' E ? E r- - IkID ? 3 is ? e ' Ph.: (727)5624750, Fax: (727)5264755 j aura J 8 do i www.MyClearwater.com I p ' ra,4 A p v H 10 1 DUdvimer. Pubdc Mlamatlon dale lr lurNShNby Np Gryd Cbamahr P bse 4lbrka Aelru'nlalmtlPNElrynveenp, eM muar by eccapfW a ro I ?' r mnnve awerlmllx brU muasvo/dewbpreyreprep k d P. '" NIPWA?' .A ' i T R n Y j p n eMUnRwarrentle> qP, bn caw.vv. awnWerero.a•rtreaay.,rau'dvydmla ddel rent' atl vrpeN UM Uee. FVMemwm. fae Cryo/Gee warerVWNE ? i rarer , msa np Ilebriry wnaUpewrearodelatl mN IM uiv armfsura ?, er„ a a N i , aq, ?' •Wu i e w PA 'e ; W?E me00 4 m0 al 5 H R t- - 1 c I.n. ,--1 A j i 5 ?faa P J RESmeXru - 1 I I HDR DR d utsm?crs DR r De dy RUd utl Wp11 IAedun DaroMY Reekend.l I n d rnOR -6.aren Derol nReea.wa rr,-1P ,. I I ~ MXOR -Medum Kpn DSrolM 0.vwemlJ - Deww RalO lM L rv< - ',. P ii `•' - ? ar - dM Xeme Prl cRXmD-ce:bmen ?xye X.gneomevacero.neuon I O i I I I / I EAGOO O,M Eq hXekl'buMOee La,u°rvabn M fAMaERWt06111 L1a ePELVa VSE 0610. LTa f _ ^ (4 ,H D:On IRt.l,y,elea4 ReaaelM mY iedu?gepY I.Imlmwew L C 1 . ammeNel P.o-spr•IRsm D-Op'eldpan OSR Reeenreden Me i1 City Owned Property .I I _ m I Agreement to Annex I (LUr va "'"J i / Annexation o Deannexalion r tl Correction c Rezoning I r ` -? _ _ ccY s -. I. .. Cam_ SUB NUMBER (' - Refer to Plat) d r . m .O I P:. n ? a " ? O ? ? ? / ! . O BLOCK NUMBER ? I ? 1ry,Y. O SUB PARCEL NUMB ER yj l ? O H? Te _ S PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) O 1 1 I I " ' nr -"": LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LQ ..a.? n u / g I 2 y R t Q COUNTY HIGHWAY - >'t STATE HIGHWAY u.n /L eT?-I q?F s. J I Is U.S. HIGHWAY i _ J ? Outside City of Clearwater zoning Atlas L t i ?- Mar 21, 2005 _ NE 114 of 30-29-15 ?- . - 319B 1?. 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:45 AM To: Elliott, Gayle Cc: DRC Members; Tefft, Robert; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Resubmittals for CDB April 17, 2007 meeting Please see below. -----Original Message----- From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:32 PM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittals for CDB April 17, 2007 meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the April 17, 2007 CDB meeting: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct CC - Planner - Wayne Wells CONDITIONS MET FLD2007-02002 - 410 N Ft Harrison Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft CONDITIONS MET FLD2006-06036 - 1515 Highland Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft CONDITIONS MET FLD2007-02001 - 1040 N Myrtle Ave - Planner- Robert Tefft CONDITIONS MET ALL ENGINEERING PRE CDB ALL ENGINEERING PRE CDB ALL ENGINEERING PRE CDB ALL ENGINEERING PRE CDB I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for you review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on, Wednesday March 21, 2007. 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:27 AM To: Elliott, Gayle; DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittals for CDB April 17, 2007 meeting 1651 Sand Key-No Issues 410 Ft Harrison- No Issues 1515 Highland-No Issues 1040 Myrtle-No Issues -----Original Message----- From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:32 PM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittals for CDB April 17, 2007 meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the April 17, 2007 CDB meeting: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct CC - Planner - Wayne Wells FLD2007-02002 - 410 N Ft Harrison Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2006-06036 - 1515 Highland Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2007-02001 - 1040 N Myrtle Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for you review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on, Wednesday March 21, 2007. LI • Wells, Wayne From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:32 PM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittals for CDB April 17, 2007 meeting DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the April 17, 2007 CDB meeting: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct CC - Planner - Wayne Wells FLD2007-02002 - 410 N Ft Harrison Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2006-06036 - 1515 Highland Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2007-02001 - 1040 N Myrtle Ave - Planner - Robert Tefft I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for you review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on, Wednesday March 21, 2007. { V 4W 1.55 Pm? Case Number: FLD2006-11i; 0 -- 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT COMMO4P Owner(s): Harborage Condo Assn Inc . 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct # 89 Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Leon Hibbs Joe 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct. ?W'%V4WV0W5"JT 4P Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 727-593-1846, FAX: 727-595-5396, E-MAIL: leonhibbs@aol.com Location: 2.42 acres located at the western terminus of Sand Key Estates Court. Atlas Page: 319A Zoning District: HDR, High Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Sand Key Civic Association Association(s): Clearwater, F134630 Po Box 3014 TELEPHONE: 727-593-1462, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Bill Morris Applicant: Leon Hibbs, Ken Dolsac, Bill Wilton, Chuck Greeley Other: Dave Richardson The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: . General Engineering: I No issues. Environmental: 1 . 1. Prior to CDB, provide a benthic survey for use in the environmental review. 2. Provide copies of SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and Submerged Land Lease prior to the commencement of construction. Fire: 1 . Must meet NFPA 303, 2000 edition- Chapter 4 Fire Protection.-4.3.4* An approved water supply shall be provided within 100ft. (30.5m) of the pier / land intersection or fire department connection serving fire protection systems. FDC can be at the street within 100ft of fire hydrant and provide 2 1/2 " hose valves on the dock.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 2. Must meet NFPA 303, 2000 Edition- Chapter 4 Fire Protection 4.2 for Portable Fire Extingushers. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 24 I . The short answer s do not have an objection based on safe navigation for this additional dock. Legal: Tie poles are allowed up to 1 foot of the existing property line, having a vessel moored bow in due to water depth and the county requirements for bottom clearance make this proposed dock as reasonable as it can be in the existing confined basin. I have reviewed the package supplied me regarding the dock and I initially had concerns due to the proximity of the boat to the adjacent property, and vessel at the adjacent property. Having been in their neighborhood on several occasions, most docks seem to have some variance applied and such seems to be'the case in the adjacent property where the dock does not appear to be in the center third of the property but as you face the water, it is off to the left of center. The overall loss of boat slips county and state wide have led to increasing requests for greater density on the water for mooring vessels. Given the opportunity to have a vessel such as this moored at the "residence" as opposed to being trailerred and launched at a local launch ramp, relieves a burden on the roadways, launch ramp and upland parking. No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - construction of boat slips. Stormwater: 1 . No Issues. Solid Waste: 1 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 25 F f4 9 Harborage Condo• Association, Inc. is not listed with the State Division of Corporations. Recommend registering with the State. Section 3-601.C.31.1 requires multi-use and commercial docks abutting single family or two-family property to be setback a minimum of one-third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single family or two-family property. Staff misread this provision previously as only requiring a setback of 10 percent of the applicant's property width measured at he waterfront property line. With the waterfront width being 290 feet, the correct setback from the east property line is 96.67 feet. Need to revise the request in the application, the written material that is part of the application and the site plan to include a setback (east) reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet. Based on this setback requirement, Staff is not supportive of the reduction requested. Provide on the site plan the setback from the east property line to the easternmost existing pier/catwalk of the existing dock. With the introduction of the new proposed dock, provide the revised width of slip #1. n Potential condition of approval: That the easternmost slip be prohibited from having a boat lift. A restrictive covenant, acceptable to the City, shall be recorded in the public records prior to the Planning Department signoff on the County permit; Potential condition of approval: That the boat moored at this eastern slip be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guest of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominium; Potential condition of approval: That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; Potential condition of approval: ' That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; 8 . Page 1 of the FLD application states the project valuation is $30,000. However, on-the City of Clearwater building permit application the valuation was listed as $9,876 and on Progressive Management, Inc. letterhead for the County permit the valuation was listed as $9,876. If the correct valuation is $9,876, then revise Page 1 of the FLD application. 9.. Based on site inspection, many of the existing boat slips on the north side are currently empty. Do all of the slip owners have boats they keep in their slips, or do unit owners buy the slips to increase the value of their units? Have all of the slips been full, driving the desire for additional slips? You have indicated that slip owners can rent their slip to other owners in the condominium. Is this being done? 10. General Applicability Criteria #2 response: If setbacks are established to maintain compatibility with adjacent properties to avoid negative impacts, provide a revised response as to how the addition of this slip will not significantly impair the value. of the adjacent single family property. 11 . Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.i (setbacks) response - Revise response to setback reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.2 feet. The Community Development Code was adopted in 1999. This setback regulation may have been erroneously overlooked in 2004, but must still be applied to this application today. 12. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.ii (length) response - Provide a response as to HOW the proposal is meeting the requirement. 13. Based on a site inspection, how will the slip owner and guests safely (from a liability standpoint) access the dock? There is no sidewalk proposed, with steps from the parking lot to the dock at the seawall level (nor is there any existing sidewalk and steps for the existing docks). There is only five feet from the tennis court fence to the seawall, including the hedge surrounding the tennis court. 14 . Revise Page 1 of the application to show parcel size (acreage) as 2.42 acres. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 2/20/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 1/11/07. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 26 Case Number: FLD2006-11060 -- 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT COMMO 1:55 pm Owner(s): Harborage Condo Assn Inc 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct # 89 07 Clearwater, F133767 D TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Leon Hibbs 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct. cftowwvok Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 727-593-1846, FAX: 727-595-5396, E-MAIL: leonhibbs@aol.com Location: 2.42 acres located at the western terminus of Sand Key Estates Court. Atlas Page: 319A Zoning District: HDR, High Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Sand Key Civic Association Association(s): Clearwater, F134630 Po Box 3014 TELEPHONE: 727-593-1462, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller Applicant: Leland Hibbs, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . No issues. Environmental: 1 . 1. Prior to CDB, provide a benthic survey for use in the environmental review. 2. Provide copies of SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and Submerged Land Lease prior to the commencement of construction. Fire: 1 . Must meet NFPA 303, 2000 edition- Chapter 4 Fire Protection.-4.3.4* An approved water supply shall be provided within 100ft. (30.5m) of the pier / land intersection or fire department connection serving fire protection systems. FDC can be at the street within 100ft of fire hydrant and provide 2 1/2 " hose valves on the dock.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 2. Must meet NFPA 303, 2000 Edition- Chapter 4 Fire Protection 4.2 for Portable Fire Extingushers. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 24 y 1 . The short answer is I do not have an objection based on safe navigation for this additional dock. Legal: Tie poles are allowed up' to 1 foot of the existing property line, having a vessel moored bow in due to water depth and the county requirements for bottom clearance make this proposed dock as reasonable as it can be in the existing confined basin. I have reviewed the package supplied me regarding the dock and I initially had concerns due to the proximity of the boat to the adjacent property, and vessel at the adjacent property. Having been in their neighborhood on several occasions, most docks seem to have some variance applied and such seems to be the case in the adjacent property where the dock does not appear to be in the center third of the property but as you face the water, it is off to the left of center. The overall loss of boat slips county and state wide have led to increasing requests for greater density on the water for mooring vessels. Given the opportunity to have a vessel such as this moored at the "residence" as opposed to being trailerred and launched at a local launch ramp, relieves a burden on the roadways, launch ramp and upland parking. No issues. Land Resources: 1 , No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - construction of boat slips. Stormwater: I . No Issues. Solid Waste: 1 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 25 1 . Harborage Condominium Association, Inc. is not listed with the Statevision of Corporations. Recommend registering with the State. 2. Section 3-601.C.3.h.1 requires multi-use and commercial docks abutting single family or two-family property to be setback a minimum of one-third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single family or two-family property. Staff misread this provision previously as only requiring a setback of 10 percent of the applicant's property width measured at he waterfront property line. With the waterfront width being 290 feet, the correct setback from the east property line is 96.67 feet. Need to revise the request in the application, the written material that is part of the application and the site plan to include a setback (east) reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet. Based on this setback requirement, Staff is not supportive of the reduction requested. 3. Provide on the site plan the setback from the east property line to the easternmost existing pier/catwalk of the existing dock. With the introduction of the new proposed dock, provide the revised width of slip #1. 4. Potential condition of approval: That the easternmost slip be prohibited from having a boat lift. A restrictive covenant, acceptable to the City, shall be recorded in the public records prior to the Planning Department signoff on the County permit; 5 . Potential condition of approval: That the boat moored at this eastern slip be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guest of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominium; 6. Potential condition of approval: That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 7. Potential condition of approval: That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction; 8. Page 1 of the FLD application states the project valuation is $30,000. However, on the City of Clearwater building permit application the valuation was listed as $9,876 and on Progressive Management, Inc. letterhead for the County permit the valuation was listed as $9,876. If the correct valuation is $9,876, then revise Page 1 of the FLD application. 9. Based on site inspection, many of the existing boat slips on the north side are currently empty. Do all of the slip owners have boats they keep in their slips, or do unit owners buy the slips to increase the value of their units? Have all of the slips been full, driving the desire for additional slips? You have indicated that slip owners can rent their slip to other owners in the condominium. Is this being done? 10. General Applicability Criteria #2 response: If setbacks are established to maintain compatibility with adjacent properties to avoid negative impacts, provide a revised response as to how the addition of this slip will not significantly impair the value of the adjacent single family property. 11 . Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.i (setbacks) response - Revise response to setback reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.2 feet. The Community Development Code was adopted in 1999. This setback regulation may have been erroneously overlooked in 2004, but must still be applied to this application today. 12. Dock Criteria of Section 3-601 #3.h.ii (length) response - Provide a response as to HOW the proposal is meeting the requirement. 13. Based on a site inspection, how will the slip owner and guests safely (from a liability standpoint) access the dock? There is no sidewalk proposed, with steps from the parking lot to the dock at the seawall level (nor is there any existing sidewalk and steps for the existing docks). There is only five feet from the tennis court fence to the seawall, including the hedge surrounding the tennis court. 14 . Revise Page 1 of the application to show parcel size (acreage) as 2.42 acres. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 2/20/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 1/11/07. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page 26 E • Wells, Wayne From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 10:26 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Buysse, Beverly A.; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne, The short answer is I do not have an objection based on safe navigation for this additional dock. Tie poles are allowed up to 1 foot of the existing property line, having a vessel moored bow in due to water depth and the county requirements for bottom clearance make this proposed dock as reasonable as it can be in the existing confined basin. I have reviewed the package supplied me regarding the dock and I initially had concerns due to the proximity of the boat to the adjacent property, and vessel at the adjacent property. Having been in their neighborhood on several occasions, most docks seem to have some variance applied and such seems to be the case in the adjacent property where the dock does not appear to be in the center third of the property but as you face the water, it is off to the left of center. The overall loss of boat slips county and state wide have led to increasing requests for greater density on the water for mooring vessels. Given the opportunity to have a vessel such as this moored at the "residence" as opposed to being trailerred and launched at a local launch ramp, relieves a burden on the roadways, launch ramp and upland parking. Bill Morris -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:12 PM To: Morris, William D. Cc: Buysse, Beverly A.; Yellin, Catherine Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Bill - DRC is next Thursday, January 4th. I have not received any comments from you regarding the above referenced case. If possible, could you send me your comments Tuesday, so that I can include them in the Draft DRC comments I will send to the applicant later Tuesday. Thanks. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:12 PM To: Morris, William D. Cc: Buysse, Beverly A.; Yellin, Catherine Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Bill - DRC is next Thursday, January 4th. I have not received any comments from you regarding the above referenced case. If possible, could you send me your comments Tuesday, so that I can include them in the Draft DRC comments I will send to the applicant later Tuesday. Thanks. Wayne 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING i ? 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ?TE'Rti,? PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY MIS2004-04025 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT COMMON CARDOSI, JOHN install a 3' x 42' catwalk & 6 tie pilings PEOPLE Role: Owner/Property HARBORAGE CONDO ASSN INC PHONE: No Phone 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 89 FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Contractor LARRY FISK PHONE: (727) 539-8113 DOLPHIN MARINE CONSTRUCTION FAX. No Fax 13056 FAXTON ST CLEARWATER, FL 33760 FEES Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due . $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Application received 4/21/2004 JVS Issue permit 4/21/2004 DONE JVS Permit COMPLETE 4/21/2004 DONE JVS rAForms\I nfoSummary.rpt Direct all Correspondence to: Application #: Clerk, Water and Navigation (official use only) Control Authority 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Commercial And. Multi-Use Dock Permit Application Pinellas County Water And Navigation Control Authority Please type, or hand print in BLACK ink. L Property Owner Information: A. Applicant's Name: The Harborage I, Condominium Assn., Inc. / John Cardosi B. Mailing Address: 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct. X72 City: Clearwater State: FL, Zip: 33767 C. Telephone No.(s): 773-954?, H. A nt information: beob Brownridge Dolphin Marine Equipment, Inc. 13056 Faxton Street Clearwater, Florida 33760 727-539-8113 Ito" 0"M III. Site Information: . 44- A. Construction Site Address: Same City: Same B. Intended Use: dock C. Parcel ID Number: 30-29-1 5-35630-000-0720 D. Incorporated: U Unincorporated: O Clearwater E. Affected Waterbody: Clearwater ad_rbor F. Previous Permits: M10520-80, M32217-02 (could be slip) G. Date applicant assumed property ownership: 212f)01 H. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) None 1. Attach 8-1/2"x11" Vicinity map showing specific project location. J. all other information pursuant to P.C.O.90-19 (amended). Section 10.9, as needed. K. Does the project abut residentially zoned property? Yes ? No ck L. For project requiring a public hearing;, attach a copy of the complete legal description. MUVrX-uSE1C0M-XR AOCK Mm JmzW BOTTOM AE?p1.iCa1:i0n b •----- - (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Framing 21x8", Decking 211x6" PT T ' ENG. SCALE: 1" = o2a ' Y Plan View N (applicant and adjacent docks) 0 0 0• 0 y 0 0 Go' • TOTAL SQUARE FEET / S NEW SQUARE FEET WATERWAY WIDTH 300 WATERFRONT WIDTH "I PA ?a • N lhnicinality Amroval I Water and NavicTation I Encrineer's Seal ,finning Approved CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPT. BY DATE_ )'" 2"-. 0-?v z,s i.•--,a • eq- 111' -4 IV. Project Description: Multi-use 2-" commercial 0 Application (official use ably) A. Nature and Size of Project: irr 3 Tio L G} 'x ya C•v Yw?? ? T *F R" .e.?, Square Feet: 1400 B. Variance: Yes: ? No: 13 Amount in variance: Length: Width: Setbacks: L: R: Other. Note: it Is the applicants responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the nature of any need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement of the regulations would remit in an extreme hards* due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the property owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not Infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicants property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application. V. Contractor Information: I, Lawrence Fisk , a certified contractor, state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with ail requirements and standards set forth In the °Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which accurately rep soft all the infonnation rqwul" be fumished. In the event that this dock is not built in accordance with the permit or the is not coif, I agregA either remove the dock or correct the deficiency. Cert. No.: 0017 Deipht`i AAarine Equipment, Inc. 13056 Faxton Street Clowater, Florida 33760 727.539.8113 Vi. Owner's Signature: I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first segue approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that i am the legal owner of the upland from which 1 herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above stated agentfcontracttor may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County, am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and vials applicable for the ed activities on either private or sovereign owned submerged land. --Q Date Legal Owner's Application (Official Use Only) Disclosure Form In order to alleviate any potential conflict. of interest with Pinellas County staff, it is required that all Authority be provided with a listing of PERSONS being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone who may have beneficial interest in the application which would be any decision rendered by the Authority. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) A. Property Owners Name: Harborage I Condo._ Assn..-/ _ John fosi Address: 1691 -Sanr1_Key.-Kstates.....Ct. #72 Address: 1 arwa r .F1.ori..da._.33 6.7 Name:_ Address: B. Representatives: Name: Address: Name: Dolphin Marine Eg iipment, Inc.____._ Address: 13056 Faxton Street _ Clearwater, Florida 33760 Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: C. Other persons having ownership interest in the subject property: Interest is: Contingent CT Absolute ? Name: --------- - Specific Interest held: D. Does a contract for sale exist for the subject property? Yes t: l No ki If so, the contract is: Contingent C1 Absolute l-i Name of parties to the contract: E. Does an opinion to purchase exist for the subject property? Yes I..1 No Name of parties to the option:__ F. Owners Signature: I hereby certify_that the i X I shove; is complete. accurate, and hrue to the best of my > / ` v7 '??.f i )tttr?: Clerk, Water and Navigation Control Authority 315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 • Applicatioin # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 1) Existing Structures And Vessels Structures-__/ Vessels 2) Proposed Structures And Vessels Structures- / -.'....-.-.- Vessels 3) Distance In Feet To Federal Channel jnnv"?-- Feet 4) Applicant Agrees 'fo Follow All Standard Manatee Precautions Yahoo!' Maps and Driving Dire(Os 0 rage i or i YOw-1 my Yahoo! Mail Search Sign In the web GetLocal a`N *New User? 5!gn.Up Mi Maps Yahoo! Maps Back. to..Map When using any driving directions or map, it's a good Idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used as an aid in planning. Copyright O 2004 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. - Terms. of Service - Copyright Policy - Yahoo! Maps Terms of Use - Help - Ad Feed..back http://maps.yahoo. com/pmaps?csz=Clearwater%2C+FL+33 767-2976&state=FL&uzip=33 ... 4/14/2004 * 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct Clearwater, FL 33767-2976 FMell&s County Property Appra ntorrnation: 30 29 15 35630 UUU 072 Page 5 of 5 Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to. Search _Page An_ext)lanation.of this screen http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.08&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/14/2004 _ .... ,,_........ . I File Edit blev,? Favorites Tools Help Search Favorites !'ledia b Back +' r 'vim - jr -' http: J/Public9is,m dearwater,comttsebsite eConnectGIS viewer,htm?ParcelID ?value=30 29 15-35630-000-0160 Gu Line ?" learwater nhect GIB Legend Locate Print -- Ill _rti ' -k C? .? Find uer ? Niau Ties -ti • ; ,- _ ?;? lr ?? Layers OAII Layers ran a„ , -Planning Cases '7 ,?,, +£. ra f V, f. Code Violations ± Occupational Licenses I ` T f ; r Permits 1 B se Ma , y I f t? y ?? - rd ? i 1 ' y a p 7 ar y+ ? a r . r w ` +lr ) w I >#r- t r -...f Parcels Clearwater Addresses ?'O Parcel Czr truids' ., s.. R#-? ?r r4 rr i,' it ! tip{ y r r , ._'r I vi!' t ? e rl _ Parcels - Roads and Bridges 4Railroads L ?' Bridges Highways W Streets r r 4 ?y , r r -?i?? Clearwater Districts And Zan DF-vJ Areas Out of Clearwati f_ ' < `? ?? - Clearwater Service Are •,. ?? . _ . = ,? _ :»e?? - s ?: ,. = f Neighborhood District s Future Land Use W - r?7nninn13' ? y Jr 1` r? ZI r East Lake \ Palm Harbor 0MSr113 r : 1 / i t Tf i - -ti---' ,?1 ? f "?'7Y .-r • - ?? ?.-? •'!? ? L ?! ?i? f LSty" A - ?: ? r Dunedin Safot, Harbor r r '! 4'4 s*"? ' ' .' ` ? - j 'w ?- i . ? ? + ?r ? t { ? c ?' +-d 111 - #. }"t I',IIY? ,4 4z' . , J _ /1? ? . V R:. '?-' .? L? . j G ? i ? , ' Y :ff,; ? i i r • ? # j ,,? ? }? 5K ? . ? -..?I ^? ' . yy. . ". . ' - Be lleairBaa•z:h Largo Feather Sound Scale, 1;2,7717 --- Map: 230011 41, 1311003,3 -- Imai?e 63-2,70 Internet Stark ?r?- I-° ? ? ;...a... ,...:: ?......? ?=' ? _ ?__ Tidemark Advanta,g e- Clearwater Zoning Micro ,? election Results t^learwat r eC,onnect I v x:51 Fr 1 i .. i -Tv ty? ?qj t 3 - 33?6 q?? - 3-7 -1° 0 0 CITY OF CLEA]'''1111,ATER DEVELOPMENT & NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES NOTICE OF VIOLATION & ORDER TO STOP WORK ADDRESS OF VIOLATION: Si.,, der C7- ?b CONTRACTOR/OWNER: DATE OF INSPECTION: 4 r/ (? ! f u,b IN NATURE OF VIOLATION: Ste' a c v..?s ?Foio/J?t.G? = ` ??ol - /J9S,B, / Ga s. /flyl f?£, 1?.? 4 f *4,+5-? 166.41 TIME: CODE VIOLATED: CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 47, ARTICLE IV, SECTION 47.083 (2) AND ARTICLE V, SECTION 47.111 THE VIOLATIONS CITED ABOVE MUST BE CORRECTED NO LATER THAN P.M. ON ,19 •A penalty will be assessed against the permit fees at the time of permit issuance. Unless otherwise specified by the inspector, a reinspection must be made before construction can be resumed. If the violations have not been corrected within the time specified, the City reserves the right to charge a fee for each subsequent reinspection and/or schedule a hearing before the Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE LISTED VIOLATIONS BY THE DATE INDICATED WILL RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (Section 162.05 et seq F.S.) Inspector's Name: 10 Received by: Inspector's Signature: (Signature indicates only a copy of this notice has been received and does not in any way indicate admission of guilt or concurrence with the findings of the inspector.) TELEPHONE 562-4567 FORM - STOP WORK 1430.0047-GC REV. 6-04 t _ III City of Clearwater 4 Development & Neighborhood Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 WEB: www.myclearwater.com PERMIT APPLICATION I I PARCEL NUMBER 0 / (?"q / 3 J 4, 36 l bc?n l Ql PROJECT/JOB NAME PROJECT LOCATION ii PROJECT ADDRESS SA-n i> k) Zaa ??5 7AIYi P 3 3 '7(a -2 BUSINESS NAME PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION L 4 NAME (last name, first) , L) ADDRESS 5 ,Q,,jZb kC f ?N 7- PROPERTY OWNER , CITY STATE - f' - ZIP 3 J ?lv PHONE FAX Email: NAME ADDRESS ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER CITY STATE ZIP PHON FAX Email: R CO.NAME ?Z' LIC. HOLDER ?!:?i Phone yax) CONTRACTOR ADDRESS ld/ ? '&Z / C9/?S 2,e?_FAX -3 CITY STATE FC -ZIP STATE LICENSE # PCCLB # Email: EXISTING BUILDING USE PROPOSED BUILDING USE GENERAL NUMBER OF STORIES BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1 II III IV V VI; P OR U _ SQUARE FOOTAGE: LIVING GARAGE/CARPORT OTHER TOT PLEASE FILL OUT BACK PAGE NUMBER OF UNITS COMMERCIAL Office Use Only • • IF FAX PERMIT, PLEASE ENTER PROPERTY ADDRESS HERE: NATURE OF WORK (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) BUILDING ? ELECTRIC ? PLUMBING ? MECHANICAL ? GAS ? FIRE ? ROOFING ? ENGINEERING[] LAND RESOURCES ? LANDSCAPING ? TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ? UTILITIES ? OTHER ? TYPE OF WORK: NEW ? ADDITION ? REMODEL ? REPAIR ? DEMOLITION ? OTHER ? VALUATION: $ / - BOARD REVIEW REQUIRED: DRC ? CASE # FL OR FLS (circle one) DATE: CDB ? DATE: APPROVED [3 DENIED ? Anyone planning to do excavation work, must notify the one-call "CALL SUNSHINE" Notification Center at 1-800-432-4770 prior to any excavation work being done, in order to prevent underground damage. Federal D.O.T. Regulation Part 192, Sections 192.614 and 192.707. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installation as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. CERTIFICATION: I HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL ASBESTOS REGULATIONS CONCERNING NOTIFICATION OF THE PROPER AUTHORITIES OF THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION PROJECTS. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. I am aware of Florida and Federal Accessibility Codes, and I certify that I have met the requirements of both. I certify that, this application together with any plans submitted is accurate and represents all work being done at this time. All work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning and if not I realize I am responsible for the removal of any construction in violation of these laws or regulations. Any deviation from information submitted, unless approved by the Building Official will render this permit null and void. PAYMENT METHOD: CASH[] CHECK[] 'CREDIT CARD[] 'If paying by credit card include authorization form. Si nature of license h9-1 r 1Please Print Name - /_ 6) 6- Date Direct all correspondence.to: • • Clerk, Water and Navigstion Control Authority 315 Court Street Application # Clearwater, FL 33756 (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-USE DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION PINELLAS COUNTY IVATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY Please type, or hand print in BLACK ink I. PROPERTY OWNER INWORMATION: A. Applicant's Name: , VZ I az)( I-/f l {-?u ) B. Mailing Address: C?v 1 ? ? f City: ?? .Q vY 3rx-A JL"e' State: C Zip: S S9 V 1-7 C. Telephone No.(s): II. AGENT IINFORAZATION: A. Name: B. Address I-A c IL fX City: M cN4 `0 at (c, PAC c -o State: Zip: C. Telephone No.(s): M. SITE IlN'FORMATION: A. Construction Site Address: / (0 S aj ()-'s Cif 441 G City: We Jkx- L ? -- B. Intended Use: C. Parcel ID Number: 1?0 / Oct / /) / 35(10??c / (Y'd 0 ((0U D. Incorporated: 'P? Unincorporated: ? E. Affected waterbody: F. Previous Permits: / G. Date applicant assumed property ownership: _ L? L( C month/year H. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) - l (LI C, I. Attach 8-1/2" X 11" vicinity map showing specific project location. J. All other information pursuant to P.C.O. 90-19 (amended), Section 10.9, as needed. K. Does the proiect abut residentially zoned property? Yes D N o L. For projects requiring a public hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description. ..;E'.,., a ..=11"-'!-t5-,.:,'7 :.?-:cc -E .E t ? • Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: MULTI-USE O COMMERCIAL O A. Nature and Size of Project: Y l` ?:1('._ Y?_e`•?_` 4:Jt"`c?`? ?`4C' C'' C. Square feet: B. Variance: Yes O No ;?f Amount in variance: Lenb h: ' Width: _ Setbacks: L R Other: NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the nature of and need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement of the regulations would.result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the property owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application. V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: I, A , a certified contractor, state that the dock h 4s not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock is not built in accordance with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree to either remove the do k or cor ct t i.ency. Signed: Cert. No.: C - (-A L Com an Name: r p y Telephone No.: -1•- Address: N Q VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide :by the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner of the upland from which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above stated agent/contractor may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County, am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the proposed activities on either private or sovereign owned Submerged land. Date Legal 0-wner's Signature D48WD:ar1/ENVMG1ANT/ComBB@ 4'26194 &ZULT1-USE/C0AD1ERCIAL DOCK r= l MHW MLW e BOTTOX Application #t (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Profile View ENG. SCALE: 1" - ? I / - N - Plan View (applicant and adjacent docks) TOTAL SQUARE FEET NEW SQUARE FEET tun WATERWAY WIDTH 3615, WATERFRONT WIDTH VC10V?Vx go- ,Q o ? ®C 0 I- I- 5 -1 3 SHORELINE Municipality Approval Water and Navigation Approval ? Engineer's Seal . Zoning Approved CITY y? OFNpib.AVtVCLEARW?A?Tf? R Y"[NG®I P1s LSAT' By l t ) L r' 0 00 -0.,.,P 0 $ D<EMJD'zrl cNVI:"31J?:7rCo^?8:3 4.2E.9: Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) DISCLOSURE FORM In order to alleviate any potential conflict of interest with Pinellas County staff, it is required that the Authority be provided with a listing of PERSONS, being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone who may have beneficial interest in the application which would be affected by any.decision rendered by the Authority. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) A. PROPERTY OWNERS: Name: (-A Ic? r l C? ?-(k ' rs Name: Address: L ,2-S Address: C. - f CIeG Name: Name: Address: Address: B. REPRESENTATIVES: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: C. OTHER PERSONS HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Interest is: contingent ? absolute ? Name: specific interest held D. DOES A CONTRACT FOR SALE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES ? NO ? If so, the contract is: contingent ? absolute ? Name of parties to the contract: E. DOES AN OPTION TO PURCHASE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES ? NO ? . Name of parties to the option: F. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: I hereby certify that the information stated above is complete, accurate, and true to the best of my knowledge. d= C? Date r DcaWD!anrN%M3MNTr,4m3B5 426'9: • MULTI-USE/COMAMRCIA.L DOCK MHW +0.75NGVD _ M11W -1.25NGVD BOTTOM i -9.1 ONGVD -7.ONGVD -5.45NGVD r (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Profile View • Application # 53' ENG. SCALE: 1" 30' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 1352 WATERWAY WIDTH 500' WATERFRONT WIDTH 150' \ I //! 30 15 0 30 - N7- \ Plan View (applicant and adjacent docks) SAMPLE P/L P/L 150' 2' 21 2. 114' 21 '2T --18' k-12'-r-12'--1 12'-t--12'2r-1 2' - -12'-1-12'-r-12' ? 1 18' I 1 53' ' 20' I 30' rim i NO DOCK SHORELINE -Municipality Approval Water and Navigation Approval Engineer's Seal RTULTI-USE/COI1MERCIAL DOCK C Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 140' \ T'g3W AfLW BOTTOM Profile View ENG. SCALE: 1" = 40' \ A, / 40 20 0 40 N - Plan View \ (applicant and adjacent docks) TOTAL SQUARE FEET 1848 WATERWAY WIDTH 1000' WATERFRONT WIDTH 162' SAMPLE P/L 2' 2' 2' 2' 2' 2' P/L ,--30' -L--181--L.' -181- -18 -i r-18'-+ x-18 -4 1..-- 30' T 20' 102' T 40' , 20' 1 a' t 14' I T 2' 1 ?- 140' 14' 20, ( I 21, 2 14' 92' --3. --- S18' 2 18' 2 -30' T -- i 14- 20' I s' 20' t 14' I 40' :- T I 12' I 20 20' 1 I 16 -? I 8 SHORELINTE Municipality Approval 7ater and INTavigation Approval Engineer's Seal D46/W0lar1/-NMT/Co.,n BBfs 4,'26.'9= Pitt PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT, INC. January 10, 2006 Buccaneer Dock Builders 14201 N. Bayshore Drive Madeira Beach, FL 33708 For the attention of Brian Bornemann: re: Boat Slip Please accept this letter as acceptance of your revised quotation dated January 5, 2006, in the amount of $9,876.00. The Boat slip is to be built as per drawing 062103 Exhibit C dated January 30, 2004, plus additional sketches for pole locations. Thank you. Sincerely, Leon Hibbs (Vice President) FOR AND AT THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS cc: Revised estimate dated 01105106 4151 Woodlands Parkway • Palm Harbor, FL 34685 • Phone: 727/773-9542 Fax#: 727/773-8740 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:47 AM To: Buzzell, William; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Reid, Debbie; US Post Office (E-mail) Subject: 1651 Sand Key Estates - this is a BOAT SLIP for the Jan 4th DRC meeting Importance: High %mob, DRC Agendallpdf FLS FLD project log.xls Good Morning DRC Members, If you haven't already you will be receiving a copy of a Flexible Development Application for the address 1651 Sand Key Estates - this is a BOAT SLIP and it is going to the January 4th DRC Meeting. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 562-4580. THANK YOU and have a GREAT DAY! Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins@mycleanvater.com Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 7:57 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Sherry - This case is to be submitted today or tomorrow. Michael has said "no fee" since we signed off on the County permit erroneously. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:36 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: Condo Dock Wayne - I informed Mr. Hibbs that under the circumstances we would process the application absent the fee. Please proceed accordingly. Thanks. mld Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727-562-4561 myclearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:36 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: Condo Dock Wayne - I informed Mr. Hibbs that under the circumstances we would process the application absent the fee. Please proceed accordingly. Thanks. mld Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727-562-4561 myclearwater.com Pinellas County Property Appr r Information: 30 29 15.35630 999 01 Page 2 of 5 t Y 16 30 J 29 7 15 l 3 5 6 3 0 ! 999 ! 0010 03-Dec-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:21:25 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales HARBORAGE CONDO ASSN INC OBK: 07394 OPG; 0968 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767-2976 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 276.02 2004 2005 sales from - : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 1982: Book 058 Pgs 051-056 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 128,800 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem; NO Use %; .000 Assessed/Cap: 128,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable; 128,800 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District; CW Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 2,803.20 1) 1 x 1 .10 1.00 T Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 2,803.20 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 2,803.20 Short Legal HARBORAGE, THE CONDO BT SLIP S NO'S i THRU 14 Description Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r-.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprr Information: 30 29 15 35630 999 004, Property._ and Land Use Code descriptions. .30 / 29 / 15 / 35030 / 999 0010 Page 3 of 5 03-Dec-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 19:21:25 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 246 Land Use; 95 Vacant Extra Fea?ures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) BOAT SLIP 10,000.00 14 140,000 140,000 1,993 2) BT LFT/OAU 3,000..00 1 3,000 2,400 1,998 3) BT LFT/OAU 7,000.00 2 14,000 9,100 1,993 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 151,500 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) R ®I _1C 1-4;1 M M http://136.174.187.131htbinlegi-ser3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Pinellas County Property Appr'r Information: 30 29 15 35630 999 0016 Page 4 of 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/egi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &Y=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Page 5 of 5 s Pinellas County Property Appraiser 1 -jj - Parcel Information '? . t? Back to Search. Page An explanation of this screen http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprr Information: 30 29 15 35630 999 0040 Pinellas County Property Apprer Information: 30 29 15 35630 000 08 Page 2 of 5 30 1 2 1 15 / 35030 / 040 l 0890 03-Dec-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:20:51 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales HARBORAGE CONDO ASSN INC OBK: 05307 OPG: 1506 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 89 CLEARWATER FL 33767-2976 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 276.02 2004 2005 - : sales from 0 Sale Date OR Book/Pa ge Price {Qual/U nQ} Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 1982: Book 058 Pgs 051-056 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 01 0 0 { } 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 0 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 0 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exemp t %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage; 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price U nits Meth 06 Taxes: .00 1) 0 x 0 100, 000.00 2.22 A Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 .00 6} 0 x 0 .00 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be .00 Short Legal HARBORAGE, THE CONDO REC ARE A Description (COMMON ELEMENTS) Building Information http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 30 29 15 35630 000 0 ;Z7 1% 16 Property and Land Use Code ..des.criptions 30 I 29 r 15 / 35030 / 000 0890 Page 3 of 5 03-Dec-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 19:20:51 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 241 Land Use: 00 Va+can? Extra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO/DECK 850SF 5.00 850 4,250 1,700 ill 2) POOL 30,000.00 i 30,000 12,000 ill 3) TENNISCT 25,000.00 1 25,000 10,000 111 4) FENCE 360LF 18.00 360 6,480 2,590 iii 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 26,290 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*_1 ®®® M http://136.174.187.1.3/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r-.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprer Information: 30 29 15 35630 000 0 Page 4 of 5 1. 16 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 30 29 15 35630 000 0 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=30... 12/3/2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, April 17, 2007, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Penethia Mack is requesting Flexible Development approval for an existing detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land with a lot area of 2,070 sq ft (0.048 acres) and a lot width of 31 ft, with an existing building ht of 12 ft, an existing front (east) setback of 2.1 ft (to building), an existing front (west) setback of 30 ft (to building) and a proposed front (west) setback of zero ft (to pavement), an existing side (north) setback of 0.1 ft (to building) and a proposed side (north) setback of zero ft (to pavement), and an existing side (south) setback of 6.5 ft (to building) and a proposed side (south) setback of zero ft (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec. 2-704.C of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1040 N. Myrtle Ave., Eldridge, J.J. Blk E, S 31 ft of N 157 ft of Lot 45 Less E 30 ft for Rd R/W. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007-02001 2. 302-308 N Osceola Properties, LLC., Georgia Street Properties, LLC., & Triangle S A Land LLC. (Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval of a 938 sq ft multi-use dock (observation pier) for a previously approved mixed-use development on the upland portion of the subject property, under the provisions of Sec. 3-601 of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Mixed-Use) at 410 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Lutz, Clovis C. Subtract A & B & Subm Land Deed #17377 & 10 ft Strip of Land Adj N & Subm Lands Deed #22859, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43.06 & 43.04, Cate's A.B. & Jennie Sub Lots 1-11 & Vac 10 ft Alley W of Lots 1-3 together with Lots A & B & Subm Land 17705, 17484 & 178452. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007-02002 3. Harborage Condo Assn., Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 sq-ft multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 sq-ft dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 % of the 290-ft waterfront lot width (217.5 ft) to 87 % (252.5 ft) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 ft to 21.5 ft, under the provisions of Sec. 3-601. (Proposed Use: Addition to an existing multi-use dock for one additional wet slip, in conjunction with existing attached dwellings [condominiums]) at 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct., Harborage, The Condo Bt Slip S No's 1-14. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-11060 4. Alice H & Ronald P Nisk, THE are requesting to delete a condition of approval (#8 on Development Order of Jan. 29, 2007) requiring an existing billboard to be removed prior to issuance of any permits and amend the conditions of approval. (Proposed Use: Automobile Service Station) at 205 & 213 N Belcher Rd., 2212-2216 Drew St. & 2205 Norman Dr., Temple Terrace, 0 Add Blk D, Lots 1 & 2, Lot 30 & part of Lot 29 & Sec 07-29-16,-M&B 33.12. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006-10058A Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUHUNG REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.comNiewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 04/05/07 ,Dad 4!0 W0610 G? rl/ riwuuo- 1 1 uou: sau 412 DAN'S ISLAND 966016 ALBERTA LTD 40BRAMS, DANIEL 4318 W AZEELE 143 SILVER SPRING WAY ABRAMS, DONNA L TAMPA FL 33609' 3824 AIRDRIE AB T4B 2V4 00030 - 1600 GULF BLVD # PH4 CANADA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 ACKERLY, WILLIAM AIMARO, DONALD J ALEA, MICHAEL T ACKERLY, DONNA S AIMARO, DOROTHY A ALEA, ESTELLA L 1660 GULF BLVD # 506 1.621 GULF BLVD 1621 GULF BLVD APT 1208 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2974 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 ALVAREZ, ANTHONY S AMBROSE, JOHN ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS ALVAREZ, FRANCINE B AMBROSE, MARYBETH ANASTASOPOULOS, HELEN 13704 PLAINVIEW RD 204 DIMATEO DR N 1600 GULF BLVD # PH1 ODESSA FL 33556 - 4043 TONAWANDA NY 14120 - 6476 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 ANSLEY, MERRILL S ARNOUL, ANNETTE M ATRIA, FRANK THE ANSLEY, LYNN ARNOUL, FREDERICK C ATRIA, ROSARIA THE 1608 SAND KEY ESTATES CT 1600 GULF BLVD # 818 PO BOX 173 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 LA GRANGE IL 60525 - 0173 BAKKALAPULO, KOSTA BAMBERGER, CHARLES BARNES, FREDERICK W JR BAKKALAPULO, FOTINI BAMBERGER, CLAIRE BARNES, SANDRA F 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 52 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 35 15818 SANCTUARY DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 TAMPA FL 33647 - 1075 BARROQUEIRO, FRANK BECKMAN, ROBERT E BEJAKIAN, SAMUEL BARROQUEIRO, JUDY 1621 GULF BLVD # 703 BEJAKIAN, JACK 8 BRAY CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 166 DEDFORD ST SOMERSET NJ 08873 - 7274 LEXINGTON MA 02420 - BELANGER, STEVEN J BELLEAIR BEACH, CITY OF BENNETT, BENJAMIN B BELANGER, TERRI L 444 CAUSEWAY BLVD 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 71 1660 GULF BLVD # 502 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3326 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 BETH, ROBERT F BIONDI, LEROY E . THE BIRNEY, MADELYNE TRUST BETH, ROXIE M BIONDI, BEATRICE H THE 32300 OLD FORGE LN 4005 NORTHVIEW CIR 6111 N SAUGANASH AVE FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334 - 3531 MESA AZ 85207 - CHICAGO IL 60646 - 5031 BLANDEN, LYLE C BLOOMBERG, CLARICE R THE BOLD, JONI M BLANDEN, KAREN 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 36 D'AMICO, MARIANNE 15303 LAKE MAURINE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 1621 GULF BLVD # 602 ODESSA FL 33556 - 3113 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 BOLLMAN, GERALD W BOND, DOUGLAS E BONE, IAN P BOLLMAN, JUDITH J BOND, DOLORES M BONE, BEVERLY D 1600 GULF BLVD # 1012 1621 GULF BLVD # 507 1660 GULF BLVD # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 • BONNAR, JOHN N BONO, JAMES C BONO, RUDOLPH F BONNAR, JILL BONG, BARBARA BONO, NANCY C WYRE LN 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 76 1621 GULF BLVD # 1607 LONG MARSTON S-0-A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3900 WARWICKSHIRE CV378RQ 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM BOOTH, DAVID BORKMAN, RAYMOND F BORST, SCHUYLER BOOTH, MARILYN E BORKMAN, RUBY P BORST, DOROTHY 970 TONKAWA RD 1621 GULF BLVD # 608 PO BOX 254 LONG LAKE MN 55356 - 9236 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 CONCORD NH 03302 - 0254 BOUBARIS, MICHAEL BOUDREAU, GREGORY L BOWES, GEORGE F BOUBARIS, ELEFTHERIA BOUDREAU, CHERI U BOWES, JEAN S 1600 GULF BLVD # 716 1633 SAND KEY ESTATES CT 1621 GULF BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 BRADY, BARRY L BRANNIGAN, JAMES M BRANTLEY, BETTE A BRANNIGAN, HEIDI L 1600 GULF BLVD # 212 550 KINGS COUNTY CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 3050 BENT CREEK TER ALPHARETTA GA 30004 - 7016 ALPHARETTA GA 30005 - 8703 BRAUN, LINDA L REVOCABLE BRENNAN, ILEEN BRETTSCHNEIDER, WILHELM TRUST 1600 GULF BLVD # 312 3050 BRYNWYCK # 209 2339 OAK TREE CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 MAUMEE OH 43537 - 9739 WINAMAC IN 46996 - 7521 BROCKMAN FAMILY LIVING TRUST BURTNICK, SIDNEY I BUSH, THOMAS A 1225 BENNETT DR STE 200 1660 GULF BLVD # 1105 47525 ARBOR TRL LONGWOOD FL 32750 - 7619 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 NORTHVILLE MI 48168 - 8501 CALDERAZZO, WILLIAM CALDWELL, CRAIG CALTAGIRONE, JAMES PO BOX 272880 1600 GULF BLVD # 912 CALTAGIRONE, DENISE TAMPA FL 33688 - 2880 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 4927-C RIVERSHORE DR TAMPA FL 33603 - 1700 CAMACHO, JAIME CAMBAS, JAMES L CAMP, MICHAEL THE DEMATTLEIS, CHRISTIAN CAMBAS, PETER L 1660 GULF BLVD # 702 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 12 1621 GULF BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 CARACCIOLO, OLGA CARRY-ON PROPERTIES INC THE CARTOLANO, JOHN CARTOLANO, EMILY R 1660 GULF BLVD # 407 3223 W LAKE STE 166-15C 1660 GULF BLVD # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 WILMETTE IL 60091 - 1069 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 CATSICHTIS, DEMETRUIS N CELGIN, HALIL S THE CHALMERS, THOMAS ALFRED CATSICHTIS, JOHN N CELGIN, GUNSELI THE CHALMERS, CRAIG J 328 83RD ST 650 ISLAND WAY # 801 2208 S DALE MABRY HWY BROOKLYN NY 11209 - 4405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1962 TAMPA FL 33629 - 6314 0 0 CHAMBERS, RICHARD D CHINONIS, ELIAS D THE CHRISTOPHER, GEORGIA JOY CHAMBERS, JUDITH K CHINONIS, KATIE THE CHRISTOPHER, CHRIS JAMES 1621 GULF BLVD # 606 1600 GULF BLVD # 211 2480 CHAMA CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 LOVELAND CO 80538 - 5100 CLARISSE, PETER D T Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition COGAN, FREDRIC C CLARISSE, MEREDITH M Joe Evich, President 32 MIZZENMAST P.O. Box 8204 176 TULIP AVE MASHPEE MA 02649 - 4022 Clearwater, FL 33758 FLORAL PARK NY 11001 - 2838 COLL, JOHN J JR COLLINS, KEITH G CONLIN, JAMES S 1 GRANIKS WAY COLLINS, JOANNE G CONLIN, NORA S MONTE BELLO NY 10901 - 3952 1660 GULF BLVD #605 1608 HAMPTON LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5236 CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES LP CONTE, JOSEPH L CONTINENTAL INS SERV INC CONTE, JULIE 176 TULIP AVE PO BOX 1188 FLORAL PARK NY 11001 - 2838 1660 GULF BLVD # 904 BRENTWOOD TN 37024 - 1188 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 CONVEY, CATHRYN R THE CORNHOFF, THOMAS J CORPAS, MOLLY CONVEY, JOHN G THE CORNHOFF, ANN M 1600 GULF BLVD #218 643 ASH ST 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 22 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 BROCKTON MA 02301 - 5754 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CORYELL, AVERY COSTA, FRANK P COTTERELL, JANICE L THE CORYELL, ANN COSTA, BRENDA D FIRTH, MARKS THE 1621 SAND KEY ESTATES CT 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 55 CRESTON TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 1600 GULF BLVD # 616 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 CROWE, BOYCE D SR CROWELL-CHEVERIE, ELECTRA CURRY, MARTIN J 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 46 THE CURRY, JOSEPHINE V CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 1621 GULF BLVD # 1201 1621 GULF BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 CUSHLEY, ROBERT DAGES, F LORENE DAHN, MICHAEL STEVEN CUSHLEY, SYLVIA M 1621 GULF BLVD # 1105 19 HIDDEN OAK DR 1621 GULF BLVD # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 FARMINGTON CT 06032 - 2735 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2995 DAMES LTD PTRSHP DAN'S ISLAND CONDO ASSN DAVIS, THEODORE W 508 SAINT JOHNS CT 1650 GULF BLVD DAVIS, BRENDA S OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 2553 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2926 18907 BLAKE RD ODESSA FL 33556 - 4401 DE BEER, MATTYS J DE MARLOR, ANNE M DELPIZZO, DENISE DE BEER, ELAINE 1660 GULF BLVD # 303 136 CAMELOT LN 1660 GULF BLVD # 1103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073 - 4410 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 DEMAIN, JOANNA DENENBERG, LENORE DENNEHEY, JOHN E THE 15 NOE AVE 1660 GULF BLVD #807 1621 GULF BLVD # 101 MADISON NJ 07940 - 2802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 DEUTSCH, MARSHALL J THE DEWEESE, RITA DI GIOVANNI, ALDO 1621 GULF BLVD # 801 1621 GULF BLVD # 704 DI GIOVANNI, RENATE U CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2995 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 1660 GULF BLVD # 608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 DICKSON, SARA L DIFIGLIO, JOSEPH L SR DILLAWAY, JOHN E 1600 GULF BLVD #914 1660 GULF BLVD # 1005 VASELLINA, JAMES CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 1268 MAIN ST # 201 NEWINGTON CT 06111 - 3043 DINGUS, FRANCES M DISCHNER, MIKE DOLIN, SARA THE 1600 GULF BLVD # 318 DISCHNER, CHARLENE 102 BIGELOW DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 810 CENTERBROOK DR SUDBURY MA 01776 - 3216 BRANDON FL 33511 - 8062 DOLSAK, BONNIE K DORTCH, RICHARD W DOWLING, WILFRED L 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 78 DORTCH, MILDRED V DOWLING, KATHLEEN B CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 PO BOX 2558 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 31 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2558 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 DOYLE, JOSEPH R DUDERSTADT, ROBERT F DUNNE, THOMAS P DOYLE, GERALDINE DUDERSTADT, LAURA B DUNNE, CLAUDIA N 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 84 1660 GULF BLVD # 205 1629 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 DYSON, JEAN EAKEN, FREEDA N EARLY, DEBRA L 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 45 1621 GULF BLVD # 1406 EARLY, CHRISTOPHER C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 44200 LAVIN LN CHANTILLY VA 20152 - 1370 EIBERGER, HORST A EISENHART, STEPHEN E THE ELLIS, CHARLES E 1600 GULF BLVD APT 718 5490 SW 85TH ST ELLIS, RITA L CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 MIIAMI FL 33143 - 8330 1621 GULF BLVD # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 EMMONS SAND KEY TRUST ERTEFAI, FAHIMEH EWERS, JOHN E EMMONS, JOHN G THE EWERS, MARY W 1390 GULF BLVD # 1101 1600 GULF BLVD # 1014 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2828 1660 GULF BLVD #1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 FAIR, DONALD M FARNHAM, MARY E FARRELL, MICHAEL D FAIR, LINDA J 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 68 FARRELL, JANICE M 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 47 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 1621 GULF BLVD # 1404 CL•EARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 FELSER, ALBERT FELSER, INA 601 BROADWAY PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 2309 FORESTREAM VILLAGE INC 4721 TRANSIT RD DEPEW NY 14043 - 4898 FRAEBEL, TRENT FRAEBEL, VIRGINIA 1600 GULF BLVD # 517 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 GADEMSKY, LEONARD C JR GADEMSKY, JOYCE B 1621 GULF BLVD # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 GEE, KEITH A THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 GLEASON, CHRISTOPHER P 1620 SAND KEY. ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 GORGA, FRANCES LARA, ANTHONY 401 POMPEY AVE STATE ISLAND NY 10312 - 3617 GREENE, ELIZABETH L REV TRUST 160 PINE ST AUBURNDALE MA 02466 - 1306 GROTH, TIMOTHY D GROTH, VERNOCIA A 30 MARK TWAIN LN EAST SETAUKET NY 11733 - 1764 0 FIRST, GEANA F THE 4964 SECLUDED PINES DR MARIETTA GA 30068 - 5603 FORSBERG, JAMES C FORSBERG, LOIS M PO BOX 3037 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8037 FRANCA LIV TRUST 2924 BAYSHORE VISTA DR TAMPA FL 33611 - 5510 GANNAWAY, DOROTHY C 1621 GULF BLVD # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 GINEZ, OLIVER 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 54 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 GLOECKL, KEITH J 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 72 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 GRADY, DANA E THE GRADY, ELSIE R THE 1660 GULF BLVD #604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 GRIMSICH, DANIEL GRIMSICH, DAVID 1621 GULF BLVD # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 GUARINO, MICHAEL A GUARINO, MICHELLE 7268 CRYSTAL SPRING RUN WEEKI WACHEE FL 34607 - 4032 i FLASHER, RAYMOND L FLASHER, DOROTHY J 1660 GULF BLVD # 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 FOWLER, CHARLES W FOWLER, SANDRA D 12903 RIVER OAK PL LAUREL MD 20708 - 2349 FRANCIS, ROBERT D HORI, LORRAINE Y 1607 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 GASH, BONITA D 1621 GULF BLVD # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 GLASSER, WILLIAM A GLASSER, LAURA J 1621 GULF BLVD # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 GONZALEZ, JOSE G SCHWARZKOPF, EULEE O 1621 GULF BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 GREELEY, JOYCE A TRUST GREELEY, JOYCE A THE 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 26 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 GROSS, WILLIAM D GROSS, PATRICIA A 1613 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 HABAL, RANDA D THE 6358 MAC LAURIN DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 1164 HADEY, JAMES H THE HADEY, JAMES H HALE, HENRY A 1600 GULF BLVD # 414 1600 GULF BLVD # 417 HALE, JULIANE T CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 821 BURNING TREE DR SE MARIETTA GA 30067 - 4723 HAMILTON, RICHARD A HAMILTON, ROSE MARIE 1632 SAND KEY ESTATES DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 HARAJLI, HASSAN 1600 GULF BLVD # 714 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 HARDING, DAVID R HARDING, VALERIE L 17708 LAKE KEY DR ODESSA FL 33556 - 4710 HAUGSETH, ROY K REV TRUST HAUGSETH, ROY K THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 1508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 HEATHER, ROBERT HEATHER, LESLIE D 1621 GULF BLVD # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 HENDRIX, RICK L HENDRIX, CONNIE 6745 STATE RD WADSWORTH OH 44281 - 9727 HIBBS, LELAND L HIBBS, ANNE A 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 16 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 HOFFMAN, DAVID A 4287 SUGARBUSH DR CANFIELD OH 44406 - 9106 HUITT, PHILIP D PO BOX 1268 EVERGREEN CO 80437 - 1268 • HAND, LOTTIE P 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 74 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSN INC 1651 GULF BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2976 HARMON, TOMMY D THE HARMON, MUFFET T THE 1600 GULF BLVD # 811 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 HAYES, PATRICIA A 50 PUTTERS PL SAVANNAH GA 31419 - 6071 HEIDEWALD, JOHN D THE SACKSTEDER, KATHRYN H THE 1482 WHITE OAK LN WOODSTOCK IL 60098 - 6412 HENDRIX, RICK HENDRIX, CONNIE L 1600 GULF BLVD # 1018 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 HICKOK, BRIAN HICKOK, KRISTINE K 1647 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 HORWITZ, HANLEY M 4970 GOODRICH RD CLARENCE NY 14031 - 2402 HYSLOP, PAUL ANDREW HOM, JOANNE T 7556 CHERRYHILL DR INDIANAPOLIS IN 46254 - 9546 HANLEY, MICHAEL O HANLEY, MARGARET R 1600 GULF BLVD # 1116 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 HARBORAGE CONDO ASSN INC 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 89 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2976 HATFIELD, MARK D HATFIELD, NELLY C 346 GROVE ST MELROSE MA 02176 - 4922 HAYS, DON A TRUST HAYS, JO ANN TRUST 11211 LAKESHORE DR W CARMEL IN 46033 - 3608 HENDRICKSON, RALPH E HENDRICKSON, SHIRLEY P 1621 GULF BLVD # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 HEWITT, MARTIN D PARSONAGE, ANNE 102 SIENNA RIDGE LNDG SW CALGARY AB T3H 3T1 00030 - CANADA HINARIS, TASOS J HINARIS, SUZANNE 1929 MISSION HILLS LN NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - 5703 HOVE, ROBERT J HOVE, SIGRID 1 1621 GULF BLVD # 1408 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 IDO, KASSIM IDO, RITA M 1621 GULF BLVD # 805 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2995 ISLE OF SAND KEY CONDO ASSN IN JACOBS, ALAN JACOBS, PAUL S 1621 GULF BLVD 1600 GULF BLVD # 713 JACOBS, MARY T CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2974 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 1660 GULF BLVD # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 JAMES, JENNIFER L- 1621 GULF BLVD # 1007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 JONES, KARL D JONES, JOANNE M 1640 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 JUREMA, ARTHUR W JUREMA, VICKI R 4240 LESLIE DR DOYLESTOWN PA 18901 - 6104 KANTOUNIS, JOHN E KANTOUNIS, DESPINA B 2583 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD # 3112 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4516 KASMAN, MARILYN THE 6723 W NAVAJO DR PALOS HEIGHTS IL 60463 - 1734 KEITH, JOSEPH H 1660 GULF BLVD # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 KLINGER, DAVID J KLINGER, KARA A 5115 HUNTCREST DR MABLETON GA 30126 - 2063 KOGIONIS, JAMES KOGIONIS, ELEFTHERIA 44 SILO RIDGE RD E ORLAND PARK IL 60467 - 7327 KUNI, NANCY M 206 LIVE OAK LANE LARGO FL 33770 - 4010 • JHOOTY, RAMNIK JHOOTY, SUKHRAJ 1621 GULF BLVD # 804 CLEARWATER FL 33767 i JONAP, LANE JONAP, MARILYN L 1621 GULF BLVD # 908 -2995 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 JONES, WILLIS L THE JONES, TERRY D 76 SUN VALLEY DR ST LOUIS MO 63146 - 5385 JUST, PINCHAS PO BOX 159 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 0159 KAPLAN, HARRIET C 1660 GULF BLVD # 908 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 KAUPPI, THEODORE L 5 BRIGHAM ST MAYNARD MA 01754 - 1114 KEOUGH, DAVID B 1660 GULF BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 KLOECKNER, KOREY L 1621 GULF BLVD # 906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 KOZUCH, JOSEPH KOZUCH, LINDA L 18 UNITY SQUARE GREENSBURG PA JUNKINS, CRAIG A JUNKINS, CATHY L 1635 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 KAIP, PETER J THE DAVIES, GARY THE 3694 KINGS POINT DR TROY MI 48083 - 5371 KAPLUS, ROBERT A 1600 GULF BLVD # 916 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 KIRSCH, JAMES P KIRSCH, KATHLEEN 770 FAIRMONT N TONAWANDA NY 14120 - 2902 KOCH, C EDMUND 1621 GULF BLVD # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 KRITSKY, PAUL J KRITSKY, LILLIAN H 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 87 15601-- 9577 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 KYRIACOPOULOS, MARIA 1621 GULF BLVD # 1403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 KYRKOS, SPIROS KYRKOS, ELLY 1660 GULF BLVD # 504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 LA FOUR ENTERPRISES INC LA ROSA, DONALD S LA ROSA, JEAN 2334 BOUDINOT AVE LA ROSA, JOANN 1621 GULF BLVD # 1205 CINCINNATI OH 45238 - 3417 710 MT HOPE AVE #6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 CINCINNATI OH 45204 - 1451 LAFAYE, EDWARD E 1600 GULF BLVD # 214 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 LAWSON, ROBERT W LAWSON, PAMELA D 5230 E HATCHER DR PARADISE VALLEY AZ 85253 -1626 LEONARD, PETER LEONARD, ALICE 3680 WOODSIDE DR COLUMBUS IN 47203 - 1229 LIJEWSKI, ALEXANDER R LIJEWSKI, SHIRLEY A 1600 GULF BLVD # 1013 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 LUDWIN, NANCY A THE LUDWIN, FRED A 1600 GULF BLVD # 215 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 LYON, RONALD L LYON, JANE 9903 KIP DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 - 2014 MAC LEAN, LACHLAN 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 67 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 MALONEY, RACHEL D 1600 GULF BLVD # 918 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 MARTIN, JOHNT & ANN M LIVING T MARTIN, JOHN T THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 1506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 LARSON, CAROLE D 1625 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 LAYMON, IRENE B 1621 GULF BLVD # 901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2995 LEVICH, MICHAEL A LEVICH, SUE E 12009 MARBLEHEAD DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2503 LOMBARD, LORRIE N 1621 GULF BLVD # 1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 LURIE, ELIZABETH 1660 GULF BLVD # PH1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2975 LYONS, GARY W LYONS, PATRICIA L 2786 COUNTRY WOODS LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6413 MADISON, JOANN 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 66 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 MALOTT, JOHN A MALOTT, MARTHA L 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT APT 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 MARTINEZ, FRED MARTINEZ, PATRICIA 1660 GULF BLVD # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 LAWFORD, KENNETH LAWFORD, MARY CLORAGH COTTAGE CLORAGH RD TIBRADDELI DUBLIN 16 00003 - IRELAND LEMERE, JOHN P LEMERE, DEBRA 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 56 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 LEVY LAND TRUST 10/25/99 LEVY, MOLLIE THE 1660 GULF BLVD # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 LONE STAR DEBT INC 3347 NW 74TH AVE MIAMI FL 33122 - 1229 LYDON, MICHAEL ANDREWS, GREGORY 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 27 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 MAC CONNELL, MARGARET M 1660 GULF BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 MAGNOLIA PARK PROPERTIES 4175 EAST BAY DR STE 150 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6989 MARSHALL, STEPHEN P WOJTOWICZ, KEVIN R 141 CHAPEL LN CANFIELD OH 44406 - 1204 MASSENGILL, ANNA 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 17 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 MAXFIELD, DANE L MAZAS LAND TRUST MC ALLISTER, MICHAEL W SR MAXFIELD, SUSAN E MAZAS, BILL T SR BNF MC ALLISTER, SHIRLEY A 518 BELLE ISLE AVE 1600 GULF BLVD # 1117 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 81 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3612 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 MC AVOY, ALOIS S 12620 BENT TREE RD MINNETONKA MN 55305 - 2851 MC DERMOTT, JAMES T DRAPP, SHANNON M 501 MANDALAY AVE # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 MC KENDRY, PAUL MC KENDRY, LAUREL F 1660 GULF BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 MENNA, ROSALIA 1609 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 MILLER, JOSEPH A IV 2012 HIGHWOOD AVE PEKIN IL 61554 - 6326 MC NALLY, WILLIAM JR THE 1637 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 MICHAELOS, LOUIS J MICHAELOS, MARY B 1018W BAY DR LARGO FL 33770 - 3225 f? MC GUIRE, BERNARD J MC GUIRE, KAREN J 1600 GULF BLVD # PH6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 MC NEILL, LILLIAN 1621 GULF BLVD # 1402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 MIKULIZA, MICHAEL J MIKULIZA, SHARON P 1621 GULF BLVD # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 MOELLER, RITA MONTEFUSCO, HARRY A 4759 E LAKE RD MONTEFUSCO, ANN C BURT NY 14028 - 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 64 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 MOORINGS OF SAND KEY HMOWNS MOORINGS SAND KEY AS HOMEOWNERS A PO BOX 1097 11350 66TH ST CRYSTAL BEACH FL 34681 -1097 LARGO FL 33773 - 5530 MORETON, CHRISTOPHER MORETON, ZIKLA S 505 WATER SHADOW LN ALPHARETTA GA 30022 - 4034 MURPHY, ROBERT A MURPHY, BEATRICE 1660 GULF BLVD #902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 NASHED, TALAAT A NASHED, MONA A 1241 REDWOOD DR ALGONQUIN IL 60102 - 5406 NIKOLLAJ, KRIST NIKOLLAJ, JOZEF 1651 SAND KEY ESTATE CT # 38 CLEARWATER FL 33767 2933 NOTHUM, J GLENN NOTHUM, DEBORAH A 110 OVERLOOK CT IMPERIAL MO 63052 - 2545 NEMEC, WILLIAM L NEMEC, PATRICIA R 1600 GULF BLVD #814 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 NOPPER, ROBERT E NOPPER,AUDREY 1621 GULF BLVD # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 ODDY, CAROL C . 1621 GULF BLVD # 1407 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 MOREHOUSE, R CURTIS BEACH, DEBORAHA G 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 82 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 NARDI, NANCY NARDI, MICHEL 1600 GULF BLVD # 1017 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 NEWSOME, JAN M MOTACKI, RICHARD 1600 GULF BLVD # 813 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 NOTHUM, DAVID M NOTHUM, GLENETTE J 2025 LEMAY FERRY RD ST LOUIS MO 63125 - 2434 ODETTE, JOHN 1621 GULF BLVD # 707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 OLDEN, ROBERT E TRUST OWEN, PHILLIP C PALMER, JESSE I OLDEN, ROBERT E THE OWEN, MARIAN L PALMER, ROBERTA D 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 32 1509 SUNSET POINTE PL 1621 GULF BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 KISSIMMEE FL 34744 - 4837 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 i PANISH, RICHARD PAPPAS, GEORGE G PANISH, PAULETTE PAPPAS, CHRISTINE G 1660 GULF BLVD #901 14239 SELVA LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 ORLAND IL 60462 - 7016 PAYSAN, MICHAEL A PAYTON, SOPHIA M THE PAYSAN, MARIAISABEL H 1621 GULF BLVD # 1501 3876 BROOKSWORTH AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 TARPON SPGS FL 34688 - 7706 PEREZ, BENIGNO PEREZ, ERNESTO J PEREZ, CONCEPCION PEREZ, SUSAN E 1621 GULF BLVD # P-H 316 LOCHEN CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2974 WINTER HAVEN FL 33884 - 3708 PHELPS, RICHARD L PHELPS, RICHARD PHELPS, LINDA C PHELPS, JOY 1660 GULF BLVD # 7 1660 GULF BLVD # 7 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 PIMENIDIS, JOHN H PIMENTEL, JOSE F PIMENIDIS, CHRISTINA 1600 GULF BLVD # 1015 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 11 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 PLOTKIN, VERA POTUCEK, PATRICIA J 5006 IMPERIAL PALM DR 132 OXFORD LN LARGO FL 33771 - 1642 CLARENDON HILLS IL 60514 - 1152 PRESTIER, DOUGLAS PRICE, BENJAMIN JAMES III TOBIN, FREDERICK W PRICE, NANCY GRACE 842 S MAIN ST 3919 AMBASSADOR DR NORTH CANTON OH 44720 - 3157 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 -1072 PRUDENTE, VITO J PSALTIS, JOHN B PRUDENTE, JOAN M PSALTIS, HELEN 1621 GULF BLVD # 402 1600 GULF BLVD # 1115 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 RANKINE, ROBERT RJR RASBY, DOUGLAS D THE RANKINE, SHARRON 1660 GULF BLVD # 1102 1616 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 REILLY, ROBERT W REMUND, MARGARET V REILLY, MARILYN G 1621 GULF BLVD # 301 43 WINDMILL RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 WEST SENECA NY 14218 - 3729 i PATTON, ROBERT W JR 2100 LAURENCE DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6466 PEEK, KENNETH L JR PEEK, MARY E 9921 TARA OAKS CIR WACO TX 76712 - 7612 PERSAUD, JAMES T PERSAUD, PATSY A 4006 DEFENDER DR NE ROSW ELL GA 30075 - 2071 PICKREN, KIMBERLY C REVOCABLE 1660 GULF BLVD # 1101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 PISCITELLI, J J LIVING TRUST PISCITELLI, JOSEPH A THE 1660 GULF BLVD # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 POTUCEK, RAYMOND G POTUCEK, PATRICIA 1 1621 GULF BLVD # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2974 PRISCO, ANTHONY PRISCO, CYNTHIA L 14 HAMPSHIRE CT HOLBROOK NY 11741 - 2851 RAGSDALE, GEORGE RAGSDALE, BEVERLY R 27 STONE RD MILLBURY MA 01527'.- 1414 REA, MARY M 1600 GULF BLVD # 611 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 RICHARDSON, NANCY W 1648 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 ROBERTS, PAMELA K 1643 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 ROGOWICZ, ROBERT I ROGOWICZ, PATRICIA A 1621 GULF BLVD # P-B CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2974 RUBINO, JOHN J RUBINO, MARGARET D 1612 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 RYAN, JOHN J RYAN, FLORENCE D 1621 GULF BLVD # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 SACKSTEDER, KATHRYN H THE HEIDEWALD, JOHN D THE 1482 WHITE OAK LN WOODSTOCK IL 60098 - 6412 SAMPEY, ROBERT SAMPEY, CAROL 5358 N MULLIGAN AVE CHICAGO IL 60630 -1020 SANFILIPPO, VINCENT D SANFILIPPO, CAROL D 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 58 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 SCHALOW, PETER JIMENEZ-LOSADA, OLY 1660 GULF BLVD # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 SCHLEFF, THOMAS F SCHLEFF, DANIA 1 1614 S 106TH ST OMAHA NE 68124 - 1019 ROBERTS, SIDNEY M ROBERTS, HELENE M 1660 GULF BLVD #906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 ROGOWICZ, ROBERT J SR ROGOWICZ, PATRICIA A 1621 GULF BLVD # 808 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2995 RUDELLA, CARL A RUDELLA, TAMMIEJO 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 73 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 RYCKMAN, DONALD R THE RYCKMAN, DONNA K THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 SALK, ROSAMOND P THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 Sand Key Civic Association Mike Dooley, President P.O. Box 3014 Clearwater, FL 33767 SAVAGE, EDWIN A SAVAGE, LAUREL A TRUST 1621 GULF BLVD # 1601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 SCHAUS, JOHN S SCHAUS, MARIE V 1621 GULF BLVD # 1203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 SCHMID, JOHN R SCHMID, PATRICIA A 1621 GULF BLVD # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ, NELL P 1621 GULF BLVD # 1507 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2966 ROSSI, DONNA M BARTH, ROBERT (H) 1621 GULF BLVD # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2905 RUHL, WILLIAM F RUHL, ANNETTE S 111 THE LANDINGS HENDERSONVILLE TN 37075 - 5213 S T ELECTRONICS WORLDWIDE INC BANK ST NASSAU BA 00000 - SALZMAN, MARILYN A 1621 GULF BLVD # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 SANFILIPPO, VINCENT D SANFILIPPO, CAROL D 1105 ST MELLION DR PRESTO PA 15142 - 1009 SCHAFFER, BONNIE G 1600 GULF BLVD # 413 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 SCHILLMOLLER, CHARLES M SCHILLMOLLER, VERENA 1660 GULF BLVD # 1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 SCHMIEDT, MARCUS SCHMIEDT, ROSWITA A 1620 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 SCHNEID, JOHN R SCHULER, PAMELA SEDIVY, THOMAS C SCHNEID, NICOLE A 501 DONNE AVE SEDIVY, VERA E 8988 FAIRCHILD CT UNIVERSITY CITY MO 63130 - 3918 4905 DRAYCROFT PL NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34654 - 5124 FUQUAY VARINA NC 27526 - 8693 SENIOR, JACQUELINE E THE SHANNON, THOMAS M SHARP, GLORIA 4889 MACARTHUR BLVD NW 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 15 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 18 WASHINGTON DC 20007 - 1560 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 SHATTUCK, GREGORY L SHATTUCK, KAREN L 1621 GULF BLVD # 1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 SHIPLEY, MICHAEL L SHIPLEY, ARDITH R 306 WINDING MEADOW WAY MONUMENT CO 80132 - 8716 SHIRVANIAN, GULBENK THE SHIRVANIAN, LINDA THE 27545 FREETOWN LN AGOURA HILLS CA 91301 - 3560 SHNIDER, DIANE G 1600 GULF BLVD # 613 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 SINGER, HARRY W THE SINGER, ELIZABETH THE 1600 GULF BLVD # 1011 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 SMITH, MICHAEL W SMITH, ELIZABETH L 1600 GULF BLVD # 816 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 STEELE, MERLE H STEELE, CONNIE H 1600 GULF BLVD # 1112 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 STYLIANOS, MINA SFOUGGATAKIS, MARO 1621 GULF BLVD # 1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 TIERNEY, MARY A THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 1003 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2930 TOMKIEL, STANLEY A III TOMKIEL, JOANNE R 23 SUNNYBRAE PL BRONXVILLE NY 10708 - 4927 SIEBENHAR, NORMAN L SIEBENHAR, KAREN T 1660 GULF BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 SLOTNICK, MITCHELL SLOTNICK, VALERIE M 1418 RIDGE RD NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - 4628 SPADONI, LEROY E SPADONI, DENISE M 11243 MELROSE CT ORLAND PARK IL 60467 - 1096 STONE, RUTH T 1660 GULF BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 2975 SUMERSON, REENA F SUMERSON, LYNN F 1600 GULF BLVD # 512 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 TITUS, BARBARA E THE 1621 GULF BLVD # 1608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3900 TRAFFICANTE, LISA A 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 21 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 SIMONE, RICHARD 1600 GULF BLVD # 711 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 SMILEY, PHILIP G SMILEY, CHRISTINE M 1621 GULF BLVD # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 SPINA, ANN M 9516 THAMES BLVD WHITE LAKE MI 48386 -1573 STRUPP, WILLIAM C NARDI, MICHEL 1600 GULF BLVD # 1114 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 THOMPSON, MARY A 512 SCHOFIELD DR POWDER SPRINGS GA 30127 - 4361 TOBIN, PAUL N 1631 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 TRETINA, JAN TRETINA, OLGA 718 BROOK AVE UNION BEACH NJ 07735 - 3143 TUMOLO, ROBERT A LIVING TRUST USTIANOWSKI, TAMARA A VALLARI, STEPHEN N 5857 STONY HILL RD 1636 SAND KEY ESTATES CT VALLARI, BARBARA D NEW HOPE PA 18938 - 5434 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2978 1645 SAND KEY ESTATES CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 VARLESE, ANNE E VASSILAKIS, GEORGE 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 86 1621 GULF BLVD # PH-G CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2974 VEIGEL, IZABELA L VERONESI, LUCIANO 1641 SAND KEY ESTATES CT 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 63 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2959 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 VOLPE, DAVID M COMMERCIAL VON SCHOTTENSTEIN, L THE REAL 1660 GULF BLVD # 804 10 CEDAR ST STE 31 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 WOBURN MA 01801 - 6365 WADE, WILLIAM A WAGNER, DALE M WADE, BOBBIE G WILLIAMS, SUSANNE 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 62 1621 GULF BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2934 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2928 WARD, HENRY JOHN WASSERMAN, DONALD WARD, NORA WASSERMAN, LORRAINE 5 GREENMOUNT HOUSE 714 BRYN MAWR AVE DUBLIN 6W 00003 - NARBERTH PA 19072 - 1402 IRELAND WEHRLY, RICHARD G WESTERHORSTMANN, JOSEPH H WEHRLY, TERRIE R WESTERHORSTMANN, ROBIN 1660 GULF BLVD # 1001 1600 GULF BLVD # 516 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 WILTON, WILLIAM H WOLSTEIN, BRIAN G 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 4 1600 GULF BLVD # 1214 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2976 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 YELOUSHAN, JAMES N YOUNG, JUSTIN L YELOUSHAN, ELIZABETH J 1660 GULF BLVD # 808 1621 GULF BLVD # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2995 ZIMMERMAN, ALLEN E ZOUNCOURIDES, ALEX 1600 GULF BLVD # 617 ZOUNCOURIDES, EVA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 1660 GULF BLVD # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2937 9 VATALARO, JOSEPH H VATALARO, JEAN E 1600 GULF BLVD #515 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2923 VO, DAN L 2124 25TH ST COLUMBUS IN 47201 - 3203 W T P ENTERPRISES 76 SUN VALLEY DR ST LOUIS MO 63146 - 5385 WALSH, CARA A STEWART, AMY L 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 48 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 WATKINS, JAMES L LYNCH, WINNOLA B 1660 GULF BLVD # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2936 WILLIAMS, ELLIS M WILLIAMS, DOROTHEE 1600 GULF BLVD # 815 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2925 YASSINE, ZOUHAIR YASSINE, CAROL M 465 INVERNESS RD AKRON OH 44313 - 4566 ZELONKA, J RICHARD ZELONKA, NANCY H 135 GOLFVIEW DR MC MURRY PA 15317 - 5326 ZWERGER, ROLAND M ZWERGER, KAREN A 1660 GULF BLVD # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2935 A Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 2:27 PM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Letter to Brian Bornemann re t... Dave - Attached is a letter to Brian Bornemann, contractor for the dock next door for the Harborage Condos. The letter still requires removal of the tie poles. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 7:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne ...simply following up to our brief talk last week. I was unable to reach back to you last thurs. I'll stop by your office later on this morning for a quick update. Thanks, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 5/24/2007 8:31:10 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Dave - Attached is a letter being sent out today to Leon Hibbs. You also are receiving a copy of the signed letter in the mail. I hope this meets with your approval to have an "end" date. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 7:21 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne .... we have both worked hard on this case and I appreciate your past efforts. It has been a month since the CDB denied Harborage 1's variance request. This all came about because of a permit being "issued in error" and a "stop work order" 1 1 y. It _t . 0 • being instituted. They are the culprets here and we have been the victims all along. Can you provide me with a time line for their compliance in getting tie poles and property line extenders removed. If I know your schedule for their compliance, I'll have a better idea as to when the area should be returned to its prior condition. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 2017323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/19/2007 5:13:37 PM >To leonhibbs@aol.com >Cc drichardson@ispwest.com >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Mr. Hibbs - Attached is the Development Order for the above referenced case, where the Community Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne <<Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Development Order.doc>> 2 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne ... thanks for update on the compliance steps. I'll look forward to receiving a copy of your note to Mr Hibbs. As I understand things, Bill Wilton will be the man who will complete the compliance activities on behalf of Harborage 1. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/19/2007 5:13:37 PM >To leonhibbs@aol.com >Cc drichardson@ispwest.com >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Mr. Hibbs - Attached is the Development Order for the above referenced case, where the Community Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne <<Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Development Order.doc>> 1 w • Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [rrllc@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: CDB compliance Wayne..as you can see in the attached memo, Bill Wilton, the President of Harborage 1, will be the point person to handle compliance requirements. Bill is a good man, a man who understands the questionable development activities of his predecessors. He does not desire to re-open any past permit questions.... he wants this whole situation over! I have told him that while I understand his interests and concerns, the area in question needs to be restored to its condition prior to all of the questionable permitting/non-permitting issues that currently plague the area in question. I look forward to discussing your compliance process to insure Bill receives the documentation he needs to complete the restoration activities to our satisfaction. Thanks, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From David Richardson[mailto:rrllc@ispwest.com] >Sent 5/2/2007 10:27:14 AM >To BWilton@salescenter.org >Cc >Subject FW: conversation 5/02/07 >Bill.... by now you have received my accounts of our prior conversations. We both are attempting to work our way through this mess, a mess that was not created by either of us. With your decision not to appeal the CDB's position, this case will now be turned over to the CPD's Enforcement Division. As I understand the process, Harborage 1 will be contacted regarding steps that need to be taken along with a timetable for compliance. I will do my part to have that contact process include a letter to you with instructions to remove property line extension materials and various tie poles that abut both sides of the proposed boat slip. If all those items are included in the enforcement action and the removal process is completed to my satisfaction, I will consider this case closed. Regards, David Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 1 0 • Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne ... thanks for the copy. Let's see what they elect to do in the next 13 days. Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/19/2007 5:13:37 PM >To leonhibbs@aol.com >Cc drichardson@ispwest.com >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060 - 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Mr. Hibbs - Attached is the Development Order for the above referenced case, where the Community Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne <<Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Development Order.doc>> 1 ---ro ORIGINAL RE lVFD ADR 0 2 2007 PLANNING GEPARIMENT CITY OF, ?CLEARWATER &VYX , (f ? 'o ids 12 ?fM1 Lyn /v v ? d ?V4? //? e--?q 0 0 64,-f 44 all ORIGINAL PECSOMD ^'R 022007 0 To: City of Clearwater Community Development Board Subject: Letter of Objection Flexible Development Application # FLl?2006-11060 Harborage 1 Boat Slip Addition 1651 Sand Key Estates Court ,From: David and Nancy Richardson 1648 Sand Key Estates Court Members of the Community Development Board, 0 April 2, 2007 Our purpose for this letter is to notify you of our objection to the requests for variance to construct this boat dock- and slip. TIIe Applicant acknowledges in their application (see the description of request section) that the required setback, in their case, is 96.67 feet. City Code calls for " multi-use and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single family or two-family property must be setback a minimum of one third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent single-family or two-family property'". Drawings the Applicant has provided in its presentation show a current 290 foot marina length. While we understand the Applicant's current main dock (slips #I through # 14) was built in the 1989s. However, by today's City Code, approximately 75 feet of that existing dock would not conform to your current setback requirements. The Applicant's request to build a new pier and a proposed new wet slip would take up the remaining 2.1+ feet of the required 96.67 feet setback to moor a large power boat unreasonably close to my property line, my rear deck and back porch area. If allowed to build the new catwalk (pier) and proposed new wet slip, the Applicant would further intrude on my privacy and the peaceful, safe use of my property. We believe that your Setback language was written for all the parties involved, to insure that the issues of acoustics, visual impairment, safety, personal>privacy rights, and peace associated with home ownership would be protected and preserved. By denying these variance requests , you are not depriving the Applicant of needed dock space. Photo #2 in the Applicant's presentation clearly reflects the current lack of usage of their available dock spaces. ORIGINAL RECEIA' on 0 2 200 Pi Ty OING F :LEARWA ERT f? ?A. 0 0 2 On March 15.2005, the Belleair Beach Board of Adjustment unanimously denied similar variances to this Applicant. The Applicant was attempting to install tie poles and to moor a boat within the required setback provisions of the Belleair Beach Code of Ordinances. Along with other concerns, lack of usage at that time was a key factor in that Board's decision to deny the Applicant's requests. Wet docks for larger boat usage remain unfilled today in both of the Applicant's dock areas. We ask that you require that the Applicant remove the tie poles and property line extension that were previously installed while a stop work order was in place. Permit # M36990-06, granted on 03/1-7/2006, was found to have been initially issued in error. This new Flexible Development Application is an outgrowth of that original issuance error of Permit # M36994-06. My wife and I will be attending the hearing on April 17 to express our objections in person. Sincerely, David M Richardson Nancy W Richardson ORIGINAL RECEKD APR 0 2 2007 PLANNING DEPAWIWENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 7 6? .:? coq _ [?? 31 /,,VOV 6 lc'C4 e /3 44,,O. 70 AIV4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON APPLICATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST The Harborage Condominium Association, owner of the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates, Clearwater, Florida, 33767, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Condominium- Plat Book 58, pages 51-56,.also described in O: R. Book 5307, Page 1506, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, :is requesting the Board of Adjustment grant a variance to the Belleair Beach Code of Ordinances to encroach 12' into the 12' required to install tie poles. City Code Section 94-214(b) VARIANCE REQUEST 05-03.. The Harborage Condominium Association, owner of the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates, Clearwater, Florida, 33767, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Condominium Plat Book 58, pages 51-56, also described in O. R. Book 5307, Page 1506, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, is requesting the Board of Adjustment grant a variance to the Belleair Beach Code of Ordinances to encroach 12' into the 12' required to moor a boat. City Code Section 94-214(c) VARIANCE REQUEST 05-04. You as a property owner within 200 feet of the subject property are invited to register your opinion at a Public Hearing to be e on Tuesday, Marc 15, 2005 at 7:00 P. M. in the City MaT located at 444 Causeway Boulevard, Belleair Beach, Florida, 33786 or you may respond by letter to the City Clerk stating your reasons for your opinion. The letter should be mailed to City Hall at the address shown at the bottom of this page. It is imperative that the Board of Adjustment knows the reason for your approval or disapproval in order to give your comments proper consideration. Any person wishing to appeal any decision of the Board of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purposes may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which an appeal is based.. The law does not require the City Clerk to transcribe verbatim minutes. Therefore, the applicant must make the necessary arrangements with a private reporter or private reporting firm and bear the resulting expense. Any person with a disability requiring reasonable accommodations in order to participate in this meeting should ,L 2 call (727) 595-4646,.ext. 124 or fax a written request to (727 593-1409. ? J Narky G. ' ollum, CM-C" City Clerk ( `v Date of Notice: February 25, 2004RIGlNIAL?j/` rJ? RECEMP APR 0 2 2007 3 PLANNING DEPAt e,v:ivo Cliff OF CLEWr 444 Causeway Boulevard Belleair Beach, Florida 33786-3399 o Phone (727) 595-4646 Fax (727) 593-1409 ) ESCIRIPTION: 30-29-15-35630-000-0160 'O RE# RT START DATE AND CONOETION: 1727) 464-3770 PERMIT NO., M36990-06 PERMITS MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED BY THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES: FL D.E_P. & U.S. ARMY C.U.E. L? ?RK y KEN BU RKE THE WATERS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PINELLAS By: COUNTY & BOCA CIEGA BAY AQUATIC Deputy Clark PRESERVE. SPECIAL REGULATIONS EXIST THAT GOVERN THE CONSTRUC= TION WITHIN AN AQUATIC PRESERVE. DATE OF ISSUANCE: PLEASE CONTACT THE FL D.E.P. s THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A DOCK STRUCTURE ONLY. ELECTRICAL; 03 1 17 1 2006 WATER/SEWER INSTALLATIONS WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS FROM THE APPROPRIATE (Municipal or County) BUILDING DEPARTMENT. FINAL INSPECTION: THIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO A 30 DAY APPEAL PERIOD FROM DATE OF ISSUE- CHAPTER 31182, SPECIAL ACTS OF 1 / FLORIDA, 1955 AS REVISED. THIS PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO RE p1-- POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION SAT THE CONSTRUCT aq[TF ' - fv CtiT1 ?tju t ?N ?q W? ?N gob d Post-ir Fax Note 7671 Dale pea°e TO From uo.iQ !. Co. Phone K Phone 4 Fax k - Fax ORIGINAL REC19YED APR 02 2007. PLANNING DEFi4MMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Pease rD pe, or hand print in BLACK ink. .. I PROPE i . RTY OVPIYER Ih'FOR.a IOI?': - A. Applicant's Name: B. _Afailing Mdress: j C # City: r 'v t? - State: '? - Zip: r7 C. Telephone No.(s): II. AGEIV'r XNF0R.hL4TION1: ` ?k` a, • ?, A. Name: 'C r MAR 0 1 20S r B, Address: 1 vl ?j .. 1 1yy the CIWK t Pinat168 Cplnlt l i p,rn:. 11(fi HI1017 CC?IfQI I\?nl'n:I:?• City: Yr CA-A.0 s r j 2cl-c V) State: c '., C. Telephone No.(s): III. SITE IN70MIATION: A. Constivction Site Address: ( e S G{' ?'? City, B. Intended Use: C. Parcel ID 1\-umber: <r o D, Incorporated: Unincorporated: E. Affected waterbodv: F F i ' . rev cus Permits: ?iiV Z•? r ?t ??? ?•` /? ? G. Date applicant assumed property ownership: _ H. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) f ? mon:h/year ?'1GC ? a I. -A,tach &-1/2" X 11" vicinity map showing specific project location. J. All other inforrr.ation pursuani to P.C.O. 90-19 (amended), Section 10 .9, as needed. h.. Does the project abut residentially zoned property? Yes 0 No 0 For pro; ects requiring a public hearing, attach a cop;; of the complete lagal description i re Ns pro{eet may also requ . , approvals from the Florida Dept of Enviroorneatal protection (813-7445100) and the u.S. Army Corps of Engineers ,,E: c,• , ••?,?, _? ??13'6?•70601. tDRIGINk. RE'IWD APR 0 2 2007 PL414NIN CITY OP r`rPARVIAI"%,? IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: . Rpplicatio L 'OFFICIAL USE ONLY) MULTI-USE O COMMERCIAL CJ 0 A. Nature and Site of Project: square feet: B. Variance: yes d No JZ( ? a...?, Amount in variance: Lenb ?: Width: Setbacks: L R ? Other. NOTE: It is theapplicaat'sresponsibilitytoclearlyde:nonstratethatanyrequestedvariaaces are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Rater and Navigation Control y4 Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the nature of and need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enfnrcement. • of the regulations wculd.result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created-,.y action(s) of thproperty owner(s), The ranting of the variance must be in harrnanwith ee harmony general intent of the regulation; not in range upon a property rights o of ors, _ e lance reques a must `berme minimum posse ]e o a ow for th- a re ore a use o he applicant's property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application. V. CONT.RACTOR.INRORNL4,TION: a certified contractor, state that the dock h not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which .accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock is not built in accordance with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree to either remove the do k or cor ct t' deficiency. Signed: q? Cert. Wo.: Company Name: r , Telephone No.: U Address: (? Nri• OAF*NEP'S SIGNATURE: I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such construction and,'if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am.the legal owner of the upland frorn which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above stated agent contractor may act as my representative, I understand that I, not Pinellas County-, am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals ?applicable for the proposed activities on either private or sovereign owned pbmerged lend. n . Da:e er's Signaturc• pcev:l3•ari?E ?Nra;, tA,?T:?? `'!R 02 2007 I"f.Aiii*NG DEPAi2 MSIVT Cif` OF CLEARWATER County ENVIRONMENTAL • MANAGEMENT Water & Navigation Phone: (727) 453-338-) Fax: (727) 434 371 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: RAGE(S): k r TO: F4x.NUMBER _llv SUBJ -Cl . FAX FROM: _-TC)M? 1_?w C_ - ORIGINAL REC?!!!E[? 6PR 02 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER t ' HARBORAG .r 06 1 Sand Key Estates Court Clearwater, F16rkia 33767, Fho i 727'595 5396 Board of, zrectors: Bilr`1?Tiltorn, pre'sz E2n ' IGE Jim Bono • Chuck Greeley hPOILH1bbs • Gona Sharp. 4?s To: City of Clearwater Community Development Board Topic: Flexible Development Application #FLD2006-11060 Date: 2/28/07 From: Harborage One Board of Directors Members of the Community Development Board, The purpose of this cover letter is to inform the Community Development Board that the Board of Directors of the Harborage One Condominium Association, by unanimous vote, support this boat dock project. We, as representatives of the sixty-four unit owners of the Condominium, have reviewed this variance application and the supporting documentation for accuracy and completeness. A favorable decision will allow us to install the fifth and final boat slip previously approved by all jurisdictions having authority over the project. This also means we can fill the request of one more unit owner to moor their boat at Harborage. We trust that you will give careful consideration to our request resulting in a favorable decision. Sincerely, Bill Wilton, president Le Hibbs, director aAf Jim Bono, director Gloria Sharp, dir or Chuc i ctor ORIGINAL RECCElVED APR 0 2 2007 -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT ;' CITY OF CLEARWATER T E D r7 ! . :7 yy_a??yd? 3 737 ILI 17 T' 7 0 d f 71 m 70 i'7 AiL 0 7 V 0 S' -b ?.:. V3sDd?l3 -7 Old '": e c! 4.j. I .'.?,J- rn 16, 4,Y2DQ 1?-v 3 ?: ' : ; • Nan F r!y a d ?z/s 1, off r t W .7.7 1Y 7* . L . d _- ?. __. ~--..._..._... .. - eat n 1 qn A r a^n nnni A lA1BM '0'1 SeHOUIrl dZO:Fo 90 SL l- UCL Id Ub lU:eba J?51 ??..-?<<?•?? cis ?- hTLII.TI.TT M14W 2 ML V1 S B O T'T'OI,iI v 0 AAAilravDn M" _?•Yv ?r?O? (OPSCIAL USE ONLY) Ke ' L s? s C- ev 3 -7 -7 Profile View N This prujeet may also .ruquiro oppFersnis Maas I'M F1mZida Dent of Environmsartat Protectisn (013-74481401 and the U.S. Army Corps at Engineers 1813.7&9-7660J. T? TOTAL SQUARE FEET XM SQUARE FWT WATETWAY vvmTH WATERFRONT WIDTH l I ? s t 'v 7k? t i at on big 4pprovro y Or= CLEARW-A.'L.R Plan Lear 'k M :ar.,hcanc and adjat;ent docks). Y F??$? v4p LL 5f 0.? r T -1 Water and Navigation Approval APPROVED PINELLAS COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FOR WILI.U". DAVIS, DIRECTOR 4 0 a eel's 1-'5 -1 T i krald Radcliff' • 4DI S. Bath Club . ' h. fi?etlirg:us ?;?arlt. r{.',:;1i1:• w W d N ? Q ? o to w c? Q Ice LL- Q Z ? _ 4 /,'g MultiVision °"k X12 2001 Mil F/ ?L-,?Vf M,- >?rHK?IVIEfV? 1C, i v sic-, Precise. measurement; OTY OF ri1 I PR o 2 2007 `? MultiVisiOn PLANNING -)tPAW v)E ' ITY E, Nl 1o a ?'sion P?cci,C r,ec;urcmc^t; C.1 CLEAPWATER MOP" !JF r"w? saa top " 1'• n' , P p=g. S:C - - aaa a: ? aaa _ a. ??a,?,?e li3ivm&31:D 3o M13 N31/V .NW3-Q+ !DN!NNVId LOOZ Z 0 MV Qgm:OM 1VNIO140 0 0 0 • Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:56 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... the current President of Harborage 1 (Bill Wilton) told me yesterday afternoon that he was unable to convince the KEY Players on the Harborage side of this case to drop their proposal and attempt to settle "out of court"-- so to speak, before this afternoon's CDB meeting. "He now expects them to come in today with guns blazing, a fight to the finish"! Their approach could have an impact on the introduction or non-introduction of my "talking points". My current plan was to deliver a soft spoken, delivery of the facts, with support from the six letters of objection and your Staff Report calling for denial of their current Flexible Development application. That was going to be it! I may have to fight fire with fire! I'll call you this morning to briefly discuss the options. Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/12/2007 8:21:14 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - I have received all six letters. I have sent to you via separate email the Staff Report for this case. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@Ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:58 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... lst.... simply following up to insure that you have received all six letters. 2nd..... your report goes to the CDB today .... will I be able to see a copy of that report when I stop by your office tomorrow, Fri 13th? Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original message ------- >From David Richardson[ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] >Sent 4/9/2007 12:15:48 AM >To Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com 1 >Cc >Subject FW: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Wayne.... did the second package of 8 sets arrive on friday? Thanks again for your counsel re. settlement discussions ..... I'm trying to make that happen. Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest:com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:18 AM To: 'drichardson@ispwest.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Staff Report for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting Mr. Richardson - Attached is the Staff Report for Case #FLD2006-11060 for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If you would like an autographed version of the Staff Report, see me or Sherry Watkins. Should you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. Wayne 11-1 Sand Key Estates Ct 1651 Staff... i • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:21 AM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Dave - I have received all six letters. I have sent to you via separate email the Staff Report for this case. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@Ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:58 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... lst.... simply following up to insure that you have received all six letters. 2nd..... your report goes to the CDB today .... will I be able to see a copy of that report when I stop by your office tomorrow, Fri 13th? Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From David Richardson[mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] >Sent 4/9/2007 12:15:48 AM >To Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Wayne.... did the second package of 8 sets arrive on friday? Thanks again for your counsel re. settlement discussions ..... I'm trying to make that happen. Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. 1 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 6:45 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne.... for my records, you should have six letters of objection: Richardson; Vallari; Hickok; Early/Lavin; Zoromski; Scavuso Do you have regular and /or e=mailed letters from these people? I'm meeting w/Harborage 1 representative tonight to determine whether we have a chance of settlement prior to next week's scheduled CDB meeting. Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/9/2007 7:19:13 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Yes, thank you. -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 12:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... did the second package of 8 sets arrive on friday? Thanks again for your counsel re. settlement discussions ..... I'm trying to make that happen. Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The 1 eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne..... received your email with CDB attachment notice. Debra Early will be emailing you her letter of objection later today. Steve Vallari and Brian Hickok will be mailing and/or emailing their letters of objection ASAP. I will call you regarding my objection letter and additional material today. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/2/2007 12:02:21 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc debraearly@aatransferinc.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - The City Clerk's office is sending out the notices today and tomorrow. With your additional neighbors, I would share the information you have received from this office with your neighbors. I am attaching the public hearing notice that is being mailed. With this email I am including Debra Early. My suggestion is to submit any letters as soon as possible. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... all three of my immediate neighbors (the same three who received the Belleair Beach Variance letter two years ago) Steve & Barbara Vallari, Brian & Kristen Hickok nor Debra Early/ Chris Lavin have received any correspondence from the Clearwater Planning Department regarding the Harborage 1" variance request and forthcoming CDB meeting scheduled for April 17th. All three parties understand that you would like to receive their letters of opposition by April 4 th. It's hard for them to respond in your desired time schedule without your Department's letter in hand, further explaining the situation and scheduled CDB meeting. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com 2 4 RRLLC@ISPWest.com • 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project >Dave - mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] neil.thompson@myclearwater.com Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning. Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. 3 Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter... I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 4 Wells, Wayne From: Hickok, Brian [Brian.Hickok@jetblue.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne; drichardson@ispwest.com; KRIT@TAMPABAY.RR.COM Subject: FW: Objection letter April 5, 2007 Subject: Letter of Objection Flexile Development Application #FLD2006-11060 Harborage I Boat Slip Addition 1651 Sand Key Estates Court From: Brian and Kristie Hickok 1647 Sand Key Estates Ct Clearwater FL 33767 Members of the Board, This is a letter of objection in reference to the request for a variance to construct a boat dock and slip adjacent to the Richardson's property at 1648 Sand Key Estates Ct. It is our opinion that the Harborage I is attempting to construct an extra boat dock and slip solely for the monetary gain of its owner. A condominium sold including a boat slip is far more valuable than without. The problem is that the applicant's dock and slip would intrude on the Richardson's personal space and privacy; furthermore, possibly effecting the value of their home. Clearly, the Harborage I condominium applicant would gain at the personal expense of the Richardson's. By definition, a variance is an official permit to build in a way normally forbidden by a zoning law or building code. The set back requirements were written to protect the rights of the property owners. We ask that you honor the rights of Richardson's and deny the request of the boat slip addition. Thank you for your time. Brian and Kristie Hickok 1 Zk f • ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 5 2007 P44NNI 6 DEPARTMENT vr- T r' • • t- Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 2:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project... talking points Wayne .... drove 60 miles through the back hills to find a FedEx/Kinkos in Dillon Colorado. We have replicated those 8 additional packages you requested; they should be at your office by Fri. 6th. See note inclosed and we'll speak by phone after you have received that package. Thanks, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne..... received your email with CDB attachment notice. Debra Early will be emailing you her letter of objection later today. Steve Vallari and Brian Hickok will be mailing and/or emailing their letters of objection ASAP. I will call you regarding my objection letter and additional material today. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/2/2007 12:02:21 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc debraearly@aatransferinc.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed.dock project 1 3 Y • >Dave - The City Clerk's office is sending out the notices today and tomorrow. With your additional neighbors, I would share the information you have received from this office with your neighbors. I am attaching the public hearing notice that is being mailed. With this email I am including Debra Early. My suggestion is to submit any letters as soon as possible. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... all three of my immediate neighbors (the same three who received the Belleair Beach Variance letter two years ago) Steve & Barbara Vallari, Brian & Kristen Hickok nor Debra Early/ Chris Lavin have received any correspondence from the Clearwater Planning Department regarding the Harborage 1" variance request and forthcoming CDB meeting scheduled for April 17th. All three parties understand that you would like to receive their letters of opposition by April 4 th. It's hard for them to respond in your desired time schedule without your Department's letter in hand, further explaining the situation and scheduled CDB meeting. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; neil.thompson@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project >Dave - Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: 2 Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com 3 -----Original Message----- C] From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 • • Wells, Wayne From: Steve Vallari [svallari@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: RRLLC@ISPWest.com Subject: objection to FLD2006-11060 L7 Mai- boat dock hearing.doc MR. WELLS, ATTACHED IS MY LETTER OBJECTING TO THE ABOVE REQUEST FOR WAIVER. WOULD YOU PLEASE INCLUDE IT WITH YOUR SUBMITTAL TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD. THANK YOU STEVE VALLARI STEPHEN N. VALLARI 1645 Sand Key Estates Court Clearwater, FL 33767 (727) 595-4178 ORIGINAL April 4, 2007 RECENED City of Clearwater APR 04 2007 Community Development Board PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Re.: Flexible Development Application #FLD2006-11060 HARBORAGE I Boat Slip Addition 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Gentlemen: I am writing this letter in response to the notice of public hearing to be held on April 17, 2007 on the above mentioned application. I object to the addition of this proposed boat dock and slip in this already greatly reduced set back area. The city code calls for multi- use and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single family property to be set back a minimum distance to protect all property owners rights to peaceful enjoyment of their property. The existing docks already intrude upon this set back. They are now proposing building a dock 21.5 feet from the property line which could dock a boat in excess of 50 feet. The wet slip required would place the docked boat within a few feet of the property line, all but eliminating any setback. A few years ago the Harborage proposed building a boat slip on the south side of there property which falls within the jurisdiction of Bellaire Beach. At that time it was pointed out that there were many unused boats slips already existing along their property. Most of those slips are still vacant today. The owners of condominiums in the Harborage purchased their units knowing the limitations on available boat slips. Sighting these conditions the city of Bellaire Beach turned down the request for waiver that would have eliminated the setback. I plan on attending the hearing on April 17 to voice by objection in person. Sincerely, Stephen N. Vallari Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:08 AM To: 'leonhibbs@aol.com' Subject: FW: Harborage 1 proposed dock project FYI -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne ...I'm away from my office and currently not in the Clearwater area. I'll do my best to get the 8 additional packages you have requested ASAP. As you know, these are "talking points" only. We stand on our letters of objection. When given the opportunity to speak on 4/17, I plan to talk about the events of OCT 13th through OCT 18th 2006 and the long history of Harborage 1 not making any attempt to work with their immediate neighbors to gain our support for their dock projects. On the contrary, they chose to cram their ideas and actions down our throats... it didn't work in Belleair Beach and we plan to show it hasn't worked thus far in Clearwater. We have one permit that we know was "issued in error", we have another prior granted permit that we every reason to believe was also "issued in error", we have a floating dock that hasn't been properly permitted, etc. We understand the CDB is here to rule on #FLD2006-11060. However, there is a history of unilateral actions taken by Harborage 1 since June of 2003 that needs to be revealed. It is your current position that " based upon this setback requirement, Staff is not supportive of the reduction requested"? Your stance on this issue is important to our case. Many thanks, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. 1 r, a Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne..... received your email with CDB attachment notice. Debra Early will be emailing you her letter of objection later today. Steve Vallari and Brian Hickok will be mailing and/or emailing their letters of objection ASAP. I will call you regarding my objection letter and additional material today. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/2/2007 12:02:21 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc debraearly@aatransferinc.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - The City Clerk's office is sending out the notices today and tomorrow. With your additional neighbors, I would share the information you have received from this office with your neighbors. I am attaching the public hearing notice that is being mailed. With this email I am including Debra Early. My suggestion is to submit any letters as soon as possible. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... all three of my immediate neighbors (the same three who received the Belleair Beach Variance letter two years ago) Steve & Barbara Vallari, Brian & Kristen Hickok nor Debra Early/ Chris Lavin have received any correspondence from the Clearwater Planning Department regarding the Harborage 1" variance request and forthcoming CDB meeting scheduled for April 17th. All three parties understand that you would like to receive their letters of opposition by April 4 th. It's hard for them to respond in your desired time schedule without your Department's letter in hand, further explaining the situation and scheduled CDB meeting. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 2 s >------- Original Message • >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; neil.thompson@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project >Dave - Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, 'under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. 3 Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 4 - , Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne ...I'm away from my office and currently not in the Clearwater area. I'll do my best to get the 8 additional packages you have requested ASAP. As you know, these are "talking points" only. We stand on our letters of objection. When given the opportunity to speak on 4/17, I plan to talk about the events of OCT 13th through OCT 18th 2006 and the long history of Harborage 1 not making any attempt to work with their immediate neighbors to gain our support for their dock projects. On the contrary, they chose to cram their ideas and actions down our throats... it didn't work in Belleair Beach and we plan to show it hasn't worked thus far in Clearwater. We have one permit that we know was "issued in error", we have another prior granted permit that we every reason to believe was also "issued in error", we have a floating dock that hasn't been properly permitted, etc. We understand the CDB is here to rule on #FLD2006-11060. However, there is a history of unilateral actions taken by Harborage 1 since June of 2003 that needs to be revealed. It is your current position that " based upon this setback requirement, Staff is not supportive of the reduction requested"? Your stance on this issue is important to our case. Many thanks, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/3/2007 1:17:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project 1 i Wayne..... received your email with CDB attachment notice. DeBYa Early will be emailing you her letter of objection later today. Steve Vallari and Brian Hickok will be mailing and/or emailing their letters of objection ASAP. I will call you regarding my objection letter and additional material today. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/2/2007 12:02:21 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc debraearly@aatransferinc.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - The City Clerk's office is sending out the notices today and tomorrow. With your additional neighbors, I would share the information you have received from this office with your neighbors. I am attaching the public hearing notice that is being mailed. With this email I am including Debra Early. My suggestion is to submit any letters as soon as possible. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... all three of my immediate neighbors (the same three who received the Belleair Beach Variance letter two years ago) Steve & Barbara Vallari, Brian & Kristen Hickok nor Debra Early/ Chris Lavin have received any correspondence from the Clearwater Planning Department regarding the Harborage 1" variance request and forthcoming CDB meeting scheduled for April 17th. All three parties understand that you would like to receive their letters of opposition by April 4 th. It's hard for them to respond in your desired time schedule without your Department's letter in hand, further explaining the situation and scheduled CDB meeting. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; neil.thompson@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project 2 >Dave - • Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday; March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 3 4 J. 0 0 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 4 _ • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Debra Early [debraearly@aatransferinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: David Richardson Subject: Letter of Objection Please see attached. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com 4/3/2007 April 3, 2007 To: City of Clearwater Community Development Board Subject: Letter of Objection Flexible Development Application #FLD2006-11060 Harborage 1 Boat Slip Addition 1651 Sand Key Estates Court From: Debra Lavin Early and Chris Lavin 1644 Sand Key Estates Court Members of the Community Development Board: ORIGINAL RECENED APR 0 3 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Our purpose for this letter is to notify you of our objection to the request for the Flexible Development Approval to construct this boat dock and slip. The Applicant acknowledges in their application (see the description of the request section) that the required setback in their case is 96.67 feet. City Code calls for "multi-use and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property must be setback a minimum of one third of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent single-family or two-family property". Drawings the Applicant has provided in its presentation show a current 290 foot marina length. While we understand the Applicant's current main dock (slips #1 through #14) was build in the 1980's. However, by today's City Code, approximately 75 feet of that existing dock would not conform to your current setback requirements. On March 15, 2005, the Belleair Beach Board of Adjustment unanimously denied similar Variances to this Applicant. The Applicant was attempting to install tie poles and to moor a boat within the required setback provisions of the Belleair Beach Code of Ordinances. Along with other concerns, lack of usage at the time was a key factor in that Board's decision to deny the Applicant's requests. Wet docks for larger boat usage remain unfilled today in both of the Applicant's dock areas. By denying this Flexible Development Application, you are not depriving the Applicant of the needed dock space. Photo #2 in the Applicant's presentation clearly reflects the current lack of usage of their available dock spaces. We encourage you to deny this application. Sincerely, Debra Lavin Early Chris Lavin ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 3 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER March 29, 2007 Community Development Board Members, City of Clearwater, We are full time residents of the city of Clearwater and reside in The Moorings. We want to voice our objection to Flexible Development Application #FLD2006-11060, Harborage One Boat Slip Addition, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court. As you are well aware, this request does not comply with current City Codes and the current setback requirements. To allow the applicants request to build a new pier and wet slip would also intrude on the privacy and safety of current homeowners. Beyond aesthetics and privacy the ratio of housing to boat docks in our small water community is a safety issue that we would expect our city Board Members to assure. When it comes to safety we insist our elected officials to be pro-active. As homeowners we comply with existing codes and also request that said applicant be required to remove the tie poles and property line extensions installed previous to stop work order. I might add that we also own property in Belleair Beach and on March 15, 2005, similar variances were unanimously denied by the Belleair Beach Board of Adjustment to this same applicant. Respectfully, Arlene and Louis Scavuzzo 147 Sand Key Estates Drive F dD USAirbill Express Trarcki 8 Number 8587 3744 5857 ,oN^. 0200 a I t 1 From ?7 ? - 4a Express Package Service Packages up to 15016& Date .. ^? ! Frid E] Ned spans _.,,a:. Oernight ? Nedd Standard Overnight business ? daesFt n " B FnhT er shipmems rbe deivred an Monday Saturday NOT available. e uss delNaryrselectlocations.• Senders > 1( 4 t 1 t 1 ?/ 3 t i`a(. yj ' / nless SATURDAY Delivery is selected. {F edEx 2Day Fed X Exp ress Saver Saturday Delivery NOT evageble. Name ! Phone b I.1yi Seaond business day.•ThUrsday ? Third business ay d shmer?s vdll be delbered on Monday Saturday Delivery NOTavailable. ip 'i l t f l t ' + i' A ' Z uNeas SATURDAY Delivery is selected. Fedrx Fmelopa rate natavailable. Minimum ch uge:One-pound rem. •TO and Company -. ' . 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 1501 / ` FedEx 1 Day Freight* FedEx2DayFre ht ? Next business day." Friday ? Second business day. Thursday ents delivered on Mond shipm livemed u FedFx3DayyFreight E:] Third business day."' Saturday Delivery NOT available. Address t SATURDAY Delivery is selected s nless SATURDAY Delivery sselected DepuRoopSuitsmoom 'Call for Confirmation •"Tommtloaedws. r1 Ci F' ` f 5 Packaging ty State ZIP ? FedEx ? FedExPak' FedEx k FedEx Other our Internal Billing Reference Envelope* IndadesFed&SmaflPek Box FedEx Large Pak and Fe& Stu rdy Tube "DatimedvalualimbSSW. t1 gD 6 Special Handling r hwhuds FedEx address in section 3 x n 3 To Reciplem'S r ( , !,r (?-? t'? ,..( J ,/f ?/% 7? .t" * ? f "f jJ ?' f SATURDAY Delivery HOLD Weekday ? Notayagablefor ? atFedExLocation Feeli Standard Overnight Notavailebla to, HOLD Saturday ? atFed ExLocatlon A il bl ONLYf F E 3 m Name ' / V ?/ G !l ! Phone 1 t ( s sve o=Fede l8 FFreghexpress FedFx First Overnight 3 my va a e or ed + Priority OverrgMeMredFx2Day o ( t I 1 / ? , 1 ' ! 1 ./ Does this shipment come in dangerous goods? Om box mart be checked. / r select lacedom. m Company / S / L r ye : r ?' r r No ? Yes ? Yes ? Dry l-6 Asperattached Shippel,Declaration D ic Ice e 9 UN1e45 k x ecipients ? ry Shippefs Declaration. n^trequired. Dangerous goods (including dry ice) cannot be shipped in FedEe packaging. --- x , , g El Cargo Aircraft Only c Address We cannot deliver to P.O. boxes or P.O. ZIP codes. Oept/RoodSuitvAown -------------- -` 1 Address ~ - ` To request/package be held at a speck Fed& location, print FedEx address here. City State / ZIP /,?? ?rT { II?IIIAII?II1111nIIIIICIIII!Illdlllllullll L 8587 3744 5857 7 Payment Billta, Obtain Recip.? F- Enter FedEx Acct. No. or Credit Cod No. below. -------- 1 Acct No. Sender ? AaCtNo.in ? Recipient ? Third Party Credit Card ? Cash/Check Section l wil be heed. Total Packages Total Weight Total Declared Valuet I a- $ t ls. ` tour liability is limited to &100 unless you declare a highervelue/. see beck for details. CreddCerd Aulh. 8 NEW Residential Delivery Signature Options Kwumquireaaignatu ro.chockoiratorlndimaL No Signature Direct Signature uired ? Anyone 4recipients ? Re Indirect Sigqriature ? anoanesavaSabsat q Package maybeleftwnh- ddressmay sign for delivery. out obtaining a signature "-ree ePpf- necipiem's address, anyone at a neighboring address may 520 fordelivery. sign fardelivery, reoep o- Rev. Dar a,N5•Pan #158281.01994-2005 FedEx•PRINTED IN U.SA. SHY Terms And Conditions Definitions on this Airbill, "we," "our," "us," and "FedEx" refer to Federal Express Corporation, its employees, and agents. "You" and "your" referto the sender, its employees, and agents. Agreement To Terms By giving us your package to deliver, u agree to all the terms on this Airbill and in the current W is Ex Service Guide, which is available upon request. You o agree to those terms on behalf of any third party with an interest in the package. If there is a conflict between the current FedEx Service Guide and this Airbill, the current FedEx Service Guide will control. No one is authorized to change the terms of our Agreement. Responsibility For Packaging And Completing Airbill You are responsible for adequately packaging your goods and properly filling out this Airbill. If you omit the number of packages and/or weight per package, our billing will be based on our best estimate of the number of packages we received and/or an estimated "default" weight per package as determined by us. Responsibility For Payment Even if you give us different payment instructions, you will always be primarily responsible for all delivery costs, as well as any cost we incur in either returning your package to you or warehousing it pending disposition. Limitations On Our Liability And Liabilities Not Assumed • Our liability in connection with this shipment is limited to the lesser of your actual damages or $100, unless you declare a higher value, pay an additional charge, and document your ctual loss in a timely manner. You may pay an additional Warge for each additional $100 of declared value. The declared value does not constitute, nor do we provide, cargo liability insurance. • In any event, we will not be liable for any damage, whether direct, incidental, special, or consequential, in excess of the declared value of a shipment, whether or not FedEx had knowledge that such damages might be incurred, including but not limited to loss of income or profits. • We won't be liable: - for your acts or omissions, including but not limited to improper or insufficient packing, securing, marking, or addressing, or those of the recipient or anyone else with an interest in the package. - if you or the recipient violates any of the terms of our Agreement. - for loss of or damage to shipments of prohibited items. - for loss, damage, or delay caused by events we cannot control, including but not limited to acts of God, perils of the air, weather conditions, acts of public enemies, war, strikes, civil commotions, or acts of public authorities with actual or apparent authority. Declared Value Limits • The highest declared value allowed for a FedEz Envelope, FedEx Pak, or FedEx Sleeve shipment is $500. • For other shipments, the highest declared value allowed is $50,000 unless your package contains items of extraordinary value, in which case the highest declared value allowed is $500. • Items of extraordinary value include shipments containing such items as artwork, jewelry, furs, precious metals, nego- tiable instruments, and other items listed in the current FedEx Service Guide. • You may send more than one package on this Airbill and fill in the total declared value for all packages, notto exceed the $100,$500, or$50,000 per package limit described above. (Example: 5 packages can have a total declared value of up to $250,000.) In that case, our liability is limited to the actual value of the package(s) lost or damaged, but may not exceed the maximum allowable declared value(s) orthe total declared value, whichever is less. You are responsible for proving the actual loss or damage. Filing A Claim YOU MUST MAKE ALL CLAIMS IN WRITING and notify us of your claim within strict time limits set out in the current FedEx Service Guide. You may call our Customer Service department at 1.800.GoFedEx 1.800.463.3339 to report a claim; however, you must still file a timely written claim. Within nine months (from the ship date) after you notify us of your claim, you must send us all the information you have about it. We aren't obligated to act on any claim until you have paid all transportation charges, and you may not deduct the amount of your claim from those charges. If the recipient accepts your package without noting any damage on the delivery record, we will assume the package was delivered in good condition. For us to process your claim, you must make the original shipping cartons and packing available for inspection. Right To Inspect We may, at our option, open and inspect your packages before or after you give them to us to deliver. Right Of Rejection We reserve the right to reject a shipment when such shipment would be likely to cause delay or damage to other shipments, equipment, or personnel; or if the shipment is prohibited by law; or if the shipment would violate any terms of our Airbill or the current FedEx Service Guide. C.O.D. Services C.O.D. SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE WITH THIS AIRBILL. If C.O.D. Service is required, please use a FedEx C.O.D. Airbill. Air Transportation Tax Included A federal excise tax when required by the Internal Revenue Code on the air transportation portion of this service, if any, is paid by us. Money-Back Guarantee In the event of untimely delivery, FedEx will, at your request and with some limitations, refund or credit all transportation charges. See the current FedEx Service Guide for more information. Pert 01582801 • R., 8/05 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:17 PM To: 'David Richardson' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Dave - Received your package today. With all we send the packages to, would it be possible to send eight more sets of your package? The eight you sent only cover the eight CDB members. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne..... received your email with CDB attachment notice. Debra Early will be emailing you her letter of objection later today. Steve Vallari and Brian Hickok will be mailing and/or emailing their letters of objection ASAP. I will call you regarding my objection letter and additional material today. Regards,. Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 4/2/2007 12:02:21 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc debraearly@aatransferinc.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project >Dave - The City Clerk's office is sending out the notices today and tomorrow. With your additional neighbors, I would share the information you have received from this office with your neighbors. I am attaching the public hearing notice that is being mailed. With this email I am including Debra Early. My suggestion is to submit any letters as soon as possible. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... all three of my immediate neighbors (the same three who received the Belleair Beach 1 Variance letter two years ago Steve & Barbara Vallari, Brian Kristen Hickok nor Debra Early/ Chris Lavin have received any correspondence from the Clearwater Planning Department regarding the Harborage 1" variance request and forthcoming CDB meeting scheduled for April 17th. All three parties understand that you would like to receive their letters of opposition by April 4 th. It's hard for them to respond in your desired time schedule without your Department's letter in hand, further explaining the situation and scheduled CDB meeting. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; neil.thompson@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project >Dave - Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- 2 From: David Richardson [ mai to:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 3 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:02 PM To: 'David Richardson' Cc: 'debraearly@aatransferinc.com' Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project CDB Public Notice for 4.17.07 ... Dave - The City Clerk's office is sending out the notices today and tomorrow. With your additional neighbors, I would share the information you have received from this office with your neighbors. I am attaching the public hearing notice that is being mailed. With this email I am including Debra Early. My suggestion is to submit any letters as soon as possible. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 proposed dock project Wayne .... all three of my immediate neighbors (the same three who received the Belleair Beach Variance letter two years ago) Steve & Barbara Vallari, Brian & Kristen Hickok nor Debra Early/ Chris Lavin have received any correspondence from the Clearwater Planning Department regarding the Harborage 1" variance request and forthcoming CDB meeting scheduled for April 17th. All three parties understand that you would like to receive their letters of opposition by April 4 th. It's hard for them to respond in your desired time schedule without your Department's letter in hand, further explaining the situation and scheduled CDB meeting. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; neil.thompson@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project >Dave - Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will 1 T send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc 2 >Subject : FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 3 To:, City of Clearwater Community Development Board: Subject: Letter of objection Flexible Development application #FLD 2006-11060 Harborage / Boat Slip Addition 1651 Sand Key Estates Court From: Marvin and Clara Zoromski 226 San Key Estates Dr. Members of the Community Development Board: • ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 3 0 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER We and the others living in the Clearwater area are very concerned about the Process of variance requests effecting established City Codes. We would hope the board considers the reasoning for the codes as originally written. In this case, there is no benefit for the city, community and especially the home owner.,Technically, -the city does protects its Tax base established with the current -setback requirements. Infringement on the Richardson's privacy, safe use of their property and visual impairment are all factors that depreciate the value of their home and in turn effect the Tax base to the City. The applicant has numerous other options open to him which comply with local and city codes. Any and all work in process or complete should be reversed immediately. J We support the existing codes and especially the Community Development board who are instrumental in controlling the growth process of the community. Sincerely, s. oromski Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 project Wayne... received your 03/28 email. Letters are being prepared by mooring's residents as we speak. Some of those residents will receive your official notice; others are taking steps to write letters on their own. I'll call you with one other issue. Regards, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/28/2007 8:58:58 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com; neil.thompson@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 project >Dave Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue 1 i Clearwater, FL 33756 • • Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDE. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[ mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. 2 www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:59 AM To: 'David Richardson' Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Harborage 1 project Dave - Notices are sent to surrounding property owners based on addresses on file with the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. It is not our policy to "forward" mail to a different address, as that is between the mail recipient and the Post Office. However, we will send the electronic version of the notice, once we receive it. On the other hand, you have everything I have and you are communicating with Ms. Early. You may make copies of what you have and send it to her if she needs such information. She has already been noticed by you that this application is scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If she desires to send in a letter of opposition, advise her to get it to me by the date I have told you so that we may include it in the package that is sent to the CDB. If she is waiting for the public hearing notice to write her letter, we may not receive it in time for the CDB package. The request that is being advertised for the property located at 1651 Sand Key Estates Court is: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 square-foot multi-use dock by the addition of an 147 square-foot dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 percent of the 290-foot waterfront lot width (217.5 feet) to 87 percent (252.5 feet) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. You have my email address if she wants to send her letter to me in such manner. Otherwise, my address is: Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Harborage 1 project Wayne, as mentioned on my call to you this morning (left on your voicemail),Debra Early should soon be receiving your mailing re:Harborage 1's variance request. However with her Moorings residence forwarding mail to her, she would likely not receive your material until well into April. She wants to respond so if you could email the variance info to her or mail it to her Virginia address she could respond in ample time to have her response included in the package going to the CDB. Again, thanks for your efforts throughout this ordeal. Regards, Dave Richardson 1 David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Debra Early[mailto:debraearly@aatransferinc.com] >Sent 3/27/2007 10:41:52 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject FW: RE: 2nd email to you >I have received both emails. I have only glanced at them as I went home sick yesterday. Debra Lavin Early A & A Transfer Co., Inc. 44200 Lavin Lane Chantilly, VA 20152 P-703-471-8338 F-703-563-7038 debraearly@aatransferinc.com -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:20 AM To: Debra Early Subject: 2nd email to you Debbie.... confirming that you received my email sent yesterday. I'm talking w/Clearwater planning dept about emailing your notification letter ...I'll know later today. If that can't be done, I'll need your Virginia mailing address. Hope all is well, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 1 . 2 W -N 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Your email to Leon Hibbs re: FLD2006-11060 (resubmittal dates) Wayne.... Sherry provided me with all the information included in Mr. Hibb's resubmittal package. When will you have reviewed Hibb's content where you feel comfortable discussing the (contents of their presentation book) with me? As we briefly talked yesterday, I have a number of questions on the next steps in the review process, the disposition of our letters of opposition, and, in your oppinion, the best ways we can prepare for the CDB meeting on 4/17. You have provided a great service up to this point; we need to take the appropriate steps to complete this case. When can we next meet to discuss these issues? Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 3/16/2007 7:24:24 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc Sherry.Watkins@myclearwater.com >Subject RE: Your email to Leon Hibbs re: FLD2006-11060 (resubmittal dates) >Mr. Hibbs did resubmit within the designated timeframe. Potentially this case will be scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If you plan to submit a letter of opposition, I would recommend submitting such letter no later than Wednesday, April 4, 2007, in order for it to go in with the package that is sent to the CDB in advance of the meeting. If you would like to obtain a copy of the resubmittal package, see Sherry Watkins in my office (562-4582). My day on 3/19/07 is open. Let me know what time works for you. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Your email to Leon Hibbs re: FLD2006-11060 (resubmittal dates) Wayne... Having not heard otherwise from you by close of business yesterday March 15 2007, I presume Mr. Hibbs did not meet your 03/15/07 resubmittal date. While I'm away on business today and thus, cannot stop by your office, I would like to see you on monday 03/19/07 to discuss probable next steps in this matter. What time monday can we spend 10/15 minutes together in brief discussion? Regards, Dave Richardson 1 David Richardson • Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:24 AM To: 'David Richardson' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Your email to Leon Hibbs re: FLD2006-11060 (resubmittal dates) Mr. Hibbs did resubmit within the designated timeframe. Potentially this case will be scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. If you plan to submit a letter of opposition, I would recommend submitting such letter no later than Wednesday, April 4, 2007, in order for it to go in with the package that is sent to the CDB in advance of the meeting. If you would like to obtain a copy of the resubmittal package, see Sherry Watkins in my office (562-4582). My day on 3/19/07 is open. Let me know what time works for you. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Your email to Leon Hibbs re: FLD2006-11060 (resubmittal dates) Wayne... Having not heard otherwise from you.by close of business yesterday March 15 2007, I presume Mr. Hibbs did not meet your 03/15/07 resubmittal date. While I'm away on business today and thus, cannot stop by your office, I would like to see you on monday 03/19/07 to discuss probable next steps in this matter. What time monday can we spend 10/15 minutes together in brief discussion? Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 Wells, Wayne From: richardson@rrcompany.com Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 6:51 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Harborage 1 dock proposal useage issue Wayne .... quick update on Harborage 1 dock useage. As of this morning, March 1st, one slight change from the my last report, one additional space is now available and a very small row boat occupies another space. This brings the percentage of useage back to 50%. Doesn't it seem reasonable to think that right now, in the middle of snowbird season, their dock useage would be at its high point for the year ...not 50% ? Again, I believe this whole application/re-application issue is all about greed, and not "a real need". Thanks, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC Richardson@RRCompany.com www.RRCOMPANY.com 973-239-9330 office 201-323-5717 mobile ----- Original message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <drichardson@ispwest.com> Cc: <richardson@rrcompany.com> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:05 PM Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal > Dave - > I don't have any additional questions at this time. > Wayne > -----Original Message----- > From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:02 PM > To: Wells, Wayne > Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com > Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal > Wayne ..... as we have previously discussed, useage of their north dock(the subject of their current > application)continues to be low. As of gam today( thursday Feb 1st), 9 of the available 16 slips are in use. > Interestingly let me add, while less than 1/2 of the available slips were in use on Dec 1st, three additional > vessels have begun to moor at at the north dock in the last 60 days. As long as I have resided at 1648 Sand Key > Estates Court, the present use of available slips is the highest number that I have ever observed. One should expect > that additional spaces will be filled in the days and weeks ahead in an attempt to create their need for another > slip. Please email any additional questions you might have at this time. > Regards, Dave Richardson > David Richardson > Richardson,Runden LLC. > www.RRCompany.com > RRLLC@ISPWest.com > 201-323-5717 1 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 8:38 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal .... s upcoming CDB meeting schedule Wayne.... In response to your earlier email, I understand that Mr. Hibbs has until March 15 to respond to your questions and be scheduled on the April 17 CDB meeting. I will check back with you periodically between now and the 15th to learn the status of Mr. Hibbs' response, if any. Yesterday, March 1st, as I was preparing to leave town for several days, I checked the occupancy status of Harborage 1's north dock. It showed 8 of 16 available spaces were occupied. At the near peak of the snowbird season, one would expect their docks to be completely full . This appears to be another strong indicator that the Harborage l,s application is not based on actual need for additional dock space. Thanks, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 2/6/2007 4:18:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal >Dave - Mr. Hibbs has enquired about resubmittal time frames and I have given him the following schedule: 1. February 16, 2007, for the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting; or 2. March 15, 2007, for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. Keep checking with me as to when they resubmit. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne... following up on your Planning Department 2006 Submittal Schedule as it relates to Haborage is "resubmittal info due" . They missed the 1/11/07 date ....is their next target date 2/8/2007 per your schedule? What happens if they miss that date, as well? Will you notify me when they do submit answers to your many questions or do you want me to keep checking in with you? Look forward to your responses, Dave David Richardson 1 Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 2/1/2007 7:05:04 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc richardson@rrcompany.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal >Dave - I don't have any additional questions at this time. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne ..... as we have previously discussed, useage of their north dock(the subject of their current application)continues to be low. As of gam today( thursday Feb 1st), 9 of the available 16 slips are in use. Interestingly let me add, while less than 1/2 of the available slips were in use on Dec 1st, three additional vessels have begun to moor at at the north dock in the last 60 days. As long as I have resided at 1648 Sand Key Estates Court, the present use of available slips is the highest number that I have ever observed. One should expect that additional spaces will be filled in the days and weeks ahead in an attempt to create their need for another slip. Please email any additional questions you might have at this time. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:56 AM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal I'll try to remember, but check back with me as I am usually busy juggling many projects and requests. -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:49 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne.... thanks for your quick response. I'll check back on the 16th. Would you please let me know if Mr.Hibbs responds ahead of that date. I'll need all the time I can get to collect letters from the interested parties and review Mr. Hibb's new submission. Thanks, Dave R David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 2/6/2007 4:18:24 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal >Dave - Mr. Hibbs has enquired about resubmittal time frames and I have given him the following schedule: 1. February 16, 2007, for the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting; or 2. March 15, 2007, for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. Keep checking with me as to when they resubmit. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne... following up on your Planning Department 2006 Submittal Schedule as it relates to Haborage 1's "resubmittal info due" . They missed the 1/11/07 date ....is their next target date 2/8/2007 per your schedule? What happens if they miss that date, as well? Will you notify me when they do 1 4 submit answers to your many questions or do you want me to ke• checking in with you? Look forward to your responses, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 2/1/2007 7:05:04 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc richardson@rrcompany.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal >Dave - I don't have any additional questions at this time. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne ..... as we have previously discussed, useage of their north dock(the subject of their current application)continues to be low. As of 9am today( thursday Feb 1st), 9 of the available 16 slips are in use. Interestingly let me add, while less than 1/2 of the available slips were in use on Dec 1st, three additional vessels have begun to moor at at the north dock in the last 60 days. As long as I have resided at 1648 Sand Key Estates Court, the present use of available slips is the highest number that I have ever observed. One should expect that additional spaces will be filled in the days and weeks ahead in an attempt to create their need for another slip. Please email any additional questions you might have at this time. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 2 . 1?- 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:18 PM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Dave - Mr. Hibbs has enquired about resubmittal time frames and I have given him the following schedule: 1. February 16, 2007, for the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting; or 2. March 15, 2007, for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting. Keep checking with me as to when they resubmit. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne... following up on your Planning Department 2006 Submittal Schedule as it relates to Haborage 1's "resubmittal info due" . They missed the 1/11/07 date ....is their next target date 2/8/2007 per your schedule? What happens if they miss that date, as well? Will you notify me when they do submit answers to your many questions or do you want me to keep checking in with you? Look forward to your responses, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 2/1/2007 7:05:04 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc richardson@rrcompany.com >Subject RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal >Dave - I don't have any additional questions at this time. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne ..... as we have previously discussed, useage of their north dock(the subject of their 1 i current • • application)continues to be low. As of 9am today( thursday Feb 1st), 9 of the available 16 slips are in use. Interestingly let me add, while less than 1/2 of the available slips were in use on Dec 1st, three additional vessels have begun to moor at at the north dock in the last 60 days. As long as I have resided at 1648 Sand Key Estates Court, the present use of available slips is the highest number that I have ever observed. One should expect that additional spaces will be filled in the days and weeks ahead in an attempt to create their need for another slip. Please email any additional questions you might have at this time. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:05 PM To: 'David Richardson' Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Dave - I don't have any additional questions at this time. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Subject: RE: Harborage 1 dock proposal Wayne ..... as we have previously discussed, useage of their north dock(the subject of their current application)continues to be low. As of gam today( thursday Feb 1st), 9 of the available 16 slips are in use. Interestingly let me add, while less than 1/2 of the available slips were in use on Dec 1st, three additional vessels have begun to moor at at the north dock in the last 60 days. As long as I have resided at 1648 Sand Key Estates Court, the present use of available slips is the highest number that I have ever observed. One should expect that additional spaces will be filled in the days and weeks ahead in an attempt to create their need for another slip. Please email any additional questions you might have at this time. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 1 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:14 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Harborage 1 proposed dock project 01/18/2007 Wayne.... thanks for taking my call this morning. Here goes: As we have discussed, our current concern is permit #M36990-06 (now in "stop work order" status). However, with the help of the records departments of Belleair Beach and Pinellas County in addition to yours in Clearwater, it has been determined that the approved permit #RM35136-04 to "move 4 tie poles and repair existing 2' x 30' catwalk" was preceeded by City of Clearwater Case Summary MIS2004-04025 which led to permit #M34308-04 issued on 04/26/04. We believe that permit #M34308-04 may also have been issued "in error" in a similar fashion to what has occurred with the current permit in question, #M36990-06. It appears that the application was signed on 04/19/04, approved by the City of Clearwater Planning Dept on 04/21/04 and then approved by Pinellas County Environmental Management on 04/24/04 and issued on 04/26/04. Given the safety, environmental, electrical, water, possible zoning and variance issues of that. proposed dock project, 7 days from application to final permit issuance seems unusual and unreasonable. I look forward to your review of this past situation in relation to resolving matters concerning Harborage l's current application. Many thanks, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 1 F-7 4% 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [richardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 7:45 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Fw: Harborage 1.1eland Hibbs' resubmitted boat dock/wet dock application Wayne.... I'm forwarding this Old Dec.2nd memo as a reminder that Mr.Hibbs has currently been requested to submit this new proposal, because he obtained permit #M36990-06 "in error". The error, not withstanding your remarks that Cleatwater Planning staff may have "misread a SETBACK provision previously", was caused by the fact that Mr. Hibbs had knowingly submitted misleading and incorrect information on the application which lead to that approval of permit #M36990-06. Further,it has been brought to my attention that the permit #RM35136-04, which was approved in 2004, was, indeed, a REPAIR permit. I appears Pinellas County does not have record of an original permit authorizing the erection of piers numbers 14A and 14B including the catwalk on MR. Hibb's current drawing. Do you have a Clearwater record authorizing the erection of that pier extension and catwalk which, according to the drawing, was constructed in 2005? We have previously discussed the fact that Mr. Hibbs conveniently left out of his original application the Belleair Beach Planning Board's unanimous rejection of a similiar variance request on the southeast side of their property in 2005. Belleair Beach has begun a records search of previous Harborage 1 applications. Wayne, these and several other questions are the issues I would like to discuss in my call to you today. Thanks, Dave David Richardson Richardson,Runden llc. www.RRCompany.com richardson@rrcompany.com 201-323-5717 ------- Original Message ------- From david richardson[mailto:richardson@rrcompany.com] Sent 12/21/2006 9:35:44 AM To richardson@ispwest.com Cc Subject FW: Fw: Harborage 1..Leland Hibbs' resubmitted boat dock/wet dock application WW's 1st letter David M Richardson Richardson,Runden llc. www.RRCompany.com Richardson@RRCompany.com 973-239-9330 201-323-5717 mobile ----- Original Message ----- From: david richardson ' To: wayne.wells@myclearwater Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Sent: Saturday, December 02, Subject: Harborage 1..Leland com 2006 11:33 PM Hibbs' resubmitted boat dock/wet dock application December 2, 2006 Wayne .... thank you for taking time this past friday, December 1st to.discuss your Department's submittal schedule as it relates to thtimetable that will be 'in place now that Mr. Hibbs has submitted his revised application. We have begun to gather information that we believe your DRC will find informative and useful as you consider the details of Mr. Hibbs' application. In discussions with my neighbors; all six parties are ready to submit sound reasons why this proposed project should not not be approved Our Mooring's Board is reviewing the facts of this application to insure the integrity of property line setbacks and our rights are met. In Mr. Hibbs' initial application leading to the permit, which was approved in error, he failed to provide truthful, complete facts about his project. Example: this project DOES abut a residentially zoned property; In your question Previous Permits, Mr. Hibbs failed to divulge that he presented a "close to identical" project to the Bellair Beach Planning Commission in 2005 and it was unanimously denied on tuesday,March 15, 2005; most importantly... Mr Hibbs answered NO to your question regarding the necessity for a variance ...all the time knowing that a variance would be required as it was in 2005 in Bellair Beach. Finally, I will call your office on January 3rd to determine the exact time of your 1/4/2007 DRC meeting as I plan on taking you up on your offer to attend that meeting. Our community and those most affected by this proposed project are united in our efforts to see that this project is denied. We stand ready to provide you with any additional information you might require as we move down the road. I'm thankful that I returned home on 10/13 and I'm thankful that you were able to determine that Mr. Hibbs' initial permit was issued in error so a stop work order could be project from getting started. We are prepared to deal with this revised application. Respectfully, David Richardson 1648 Sand Key Estates Court Clearwater, Fla 33767 727-593-0644 201-323-5717 mobile David M Richardson Richardson,Runden llc. www.RRCompany.com Richardson@RRCompany.com 973-239-9330 201-323-5717 mobile issued to prevent this 2 WT 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 6:03 PM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dave - No additional DRC meetings are necessary for this application. Once they resubmit, and the resubmittal information is acceptable, the application will be placed on the next available CDB meeting, most likely the March 20, 2007 meeting. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne ...thanks for update. I will follow-up w/you on the 12th. Question.... depending on Hibb's answers to your questions, might you not require another DRC meeting to.insure a full comprehension of Harborage 1's plans ahead of scheduling the March CDB meeting? David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 1/5/2007 7:19:49 AM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Dave - Mr. Hibbs has talked to me since the DRC meeting. Because of vacation plans, they may not submit for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting, but may delay their submission to go to the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting. You may still check with me on January 12th to see their status. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:03 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne... As we have discussed, I have been through the DRC meeting process before when I needed to have a proposed deck project approved several years back. I forgot how detailed your requirements are and the various questions applicants must answer in the 1 ff 14 0 0 process. You guys do great work and it was reassuring to know that the Harborage 1 proposed project is now subject to close scrutiny as their Association Representatives will be required to answer all of your questions and revise their plans to satisfy current Code language and considerations. I'm still perplexed as to how they have avoided your review scrutiny in the recent past. Permits have been granted to Harborage 1 where we ( the single family homeowners) were never afforded the opportunity to voice objection to a variety of proposed plans. Thanks to your quick response to my inquiry in early October,2007, the "stop work order" on this current project was put in place. I will stay in touch with you regarding their revised proposal and their responses to your many questions outlined to them yesterday. Wayne, this group will not back off, they will want to proceed to the CDB review level even though the DRC does not support their proposal and they will not reach out to me, my neighbors nor The Moorings Board of Directors with an attempt to reach an accord. They have no regard for others as they have shown through their attempts to introduce permit requests using false information with no regard for the health, safety, property rights nor community interests of their neighbors. More to follow. I'll call you the morning of the 12th to discuss their response. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[ mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com) >Sent 1/2/2007 3:30:57 PM >To leonhibbs@aol.com >Cc >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Mr. Hibbs - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting at 1:55 pm on Thursday, January 4, 2007, in the Planning Department offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me or email me. Wayne <<draft 1.4.07 dre action agenda.pdf>> 2 I'll, Wl • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 7:20 AM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dave - Mr..Hibbs has talked to me since the DRC meeting. Because of vacation plans, they may not submit for the February 20, 2007, CDB meeting, but may delay their submission to go to the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting. You may still check with me on January 12th to see their status. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:03 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne... As we have discussed, I have been through the DRC meeting process before when I needed to have a proposed deck project approved several years back. I forgot how detailed your requirements are and the various questions applicants must answer in the process. You guys do great work and it was reassuring to know that the Harborage 1 proposed project is now subject to close scrutiny as their Association Representatives will be required to answer all of your questions and revise their plans to satisfy current Code language and considerations. . I'm still perplexed as to how they have avoided your review scrutiny in the recent past. Permits have been granted to Harborage 1 where we ( the single family homeowners) were never afforded'the opportunity to voice objection to a variety of proposed plans. Thanks to your quick response to my inquiry in early October,2007, the "stop work order" on this current project was put in place. I will stay in touch with you regarding their revised proposal and their responses to your many questions outlined to them yesterday. Wayne, this group will not back off, they will want to proceed to the CDB review level even though the DRC does not support their proposal and they will not reach out to me, my neighbors nor The Moorings Board of Directors with an attempt to reach an accord. They have no regard for others as they have shown through their attempts to introduce permit requests using false information with no regard for the health, safety, property rights nor community interests of their neighbors. More to follow. I'll call you the morning of the 12th to discuss their response. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 1 w"k 0 >------- Original Message - -- • >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 1/2/2007.3:30:57 PM >To leonhibbs@aol.com >Cc >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Mr. Hibbs - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting at 1:55 pm on Thursday, January 4, 2007, in the Planning Department offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me or email me. Wayne <<draft 1.4.07 dre action agenda.pdf>> 2 Wells, Wayne From: david richardson [richardson@rrcompany.com] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne...... I understand your explanation and further understand that the issue at hand is THIS application and required conformance with current Code Requirements. I'll see you this afternoon, Dave Richardson David M Richardson Richardson,Runden llc. www.RRCompany.com Richardson@RRCompany.com 973-239-9330 201-323-5717 mobile ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <richardson@rrcompany.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 5:18 AM Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dave - By the looks of the existing multi-use docks, they have been there for some time. The current Code requirements were adopted in 1999. The existing docks are considered nonconforming (grandfathered) to required setbacks, can remain in their present location and be repaired and maintained, and no further action is necessary for these existing docks. The issue, and subject of this application, is the proposed dock adjacent to your property and the conformance with current Code requirements (setbacks, overall width, etc.). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: richardson@rrcompany.com [mailto:richardson@rrcompany.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne .... I received the copy of your email to Mr. Hibbs. Thanks for keeping me in the loop regarding your 14 questions concerning the application. Regarding #11, I do look forward to seeing the content of the 2004 permit # RM35136-04. Harborage 1's current setback, per a blue line on their seawall, appears to be about 42 feet from their property line. Getting to 42feet from the required 96+ feet should have triggered the need for a variance. Am I right? Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC Richardson@RRCompany.com www.RRCOMPANY.com 973-239-9330 office 201-323-5717 mobile ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <leonhibbs@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 6:30 PM 1 Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Mr. Hibbs - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting at 1:55 pm on Thursday, January 4, 2007, in the Planning Department offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me or email me. Wayne <<draft 1.4.07 dre action agenda.pdf>> 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:18 AM To: 'richardson@rrcompany.com' Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dave - By the looks of the existing multi-use docks, they have been there for some time. The current Code requirements were adopted in 1999. The existing docks are considered nonconforming (grandfathered) to required setbacks, can remain in their present location and be repaired and maintained, and no further action is necessary for these existing docks. The issue, and subject of this application, is the proposed dock adjacent to your property and the conformance with current Code requirements (setbacks, overall width, etc.). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: richardson@rrcompany.com [mailto:richardson@rrcompany.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne .... I received the copy of your email to Mr. Hibbs. Thanks for keeping me in the loop regarding your 14 questions concerning the application. Regarding #11, I do look forward to seeing the content of the 2004 permit # RM35136-04. Harborage 1's current setback, per a blue line on their seawall, appears to be about 42 feet from their property line. Getting to 42feet from the required 96+ feet should have triggered the need for a variance. Am I right? Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC Richardson@RRCompany.com www.RRCOMPANY.com 973-239-9330 office 201-323-5717 mobile ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <leonhibbs@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 6:30 PM Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Mr. Hibbs - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting at 1:55 pm on Thursday; January 4, 2007, in the Planning Department offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me or email me. Wayne <<draft 1.4.07 dre action agenda.pdf>> I Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 3:25 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Wayne thanks for your 12/31 update. I will call you on Wed. 01/03 to discuss your outline for the 01/04 DRC meeting, as I do plan to attend your meeting. In addition, I believe that Harborage 1 is currently in violation of City of Clearwater SETBACK Code. This makes review of their prior applications a most important issue. Regards, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 >------- Original Message ------- >From Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com[mailto:Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com] >Sent 12/31/2006 1:49:58 PM >To drichardson@ispwest.com >Cc , >Subject RE: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court >Dave - Just to let you know, I have been receiving your emails. With reference to the below, you are correct, and I misread, as to the setback provisions. Subsequently, I am advising the applicant he will need to revise their request and justification for a setback reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet. If you are unaware, the DRC meeting for this application has been scheduled for 1:55 pm on Thursday, January 4, 2007. I will be sending out the Draft DRC comments late Tuesday and will include you in their distribution. Have a Happy (and safe) New Year!!! Wayne -----Original Message----- From: David Richardson [ mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: re: Harborage 1 (H1PDP) proposed dock project Dear Wayne, Season's greetings! Hope I now have your correct email address. As we discussed via telephone last week, I will be passing along questions and comments about the (H1PDP) proposal as issues arise prior to your 01/04/2007 meeting. 1 > in the (H1PDP) application material, they make reference ttheir 11550 linear feet of shoreline". We presume that figure to reflect their Clearwater property width measured at the waterfront property line? Your Development Standards Code referring to Dimensional standards h. SETBACKS ..so states " multi- use private and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single-family or two- family property must be setback a minumum of one-third of the applicant's property width from the adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property. Even though the(H1PDP) makes constant reference to its current 290 foot marina length, SETBACK code language makes specific reference to "property width measured at, the waterfront property line". The current Harborage 1 dock setback from my property line violates the intent of your code language no matter whether one uses the 550 linear feet of shoreline language OR their current 290 feet of marina length. 550' equates toga 183 foot setback while 2901equates to a 97 foot setback. > We do need to see both past permits # M10520-80 and #RM35136-04 to determine exactly how SETBACKS and variance requests were handled in 1980 and 2004 respectively. > In the (H1PDP) material submitted , SECTION D written submittal requirements ITEM#2 ... They are correct in stating "the value of their condo unit, whose owner will have use rights to the new slip, will increase." Both Realtors and Independent Appraisers will provide financial information to support that both my property and my neighbor's property will be substantially devalued with the presence of a boat moored one foot off my property line. Negative economic impact is a large issue in this case. > In item #6, the applicant states that no visual impairment nor adverse accoustic conseqence will occur. We beg to differ; SETBACKS were established and are required for the specific purpose of insuring and/or negating the issues of visual impairment,accoustics,personal privacy rights, and peace associated with home ownership are preserved. Wayne, this is an ongoing effort to see that this permit request is not granted so I expect to have additional questions and comments for you shortly. Respectfully, Dave Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 2 C"N `.`1 P IN 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:50 PM To: 'David Richardson' Subject: FLD2006-11060, 1651 Sand Key Estates Court Dave Just to let you know, I have been receiving your emails. With reference to the below, you are correct, and I misread, as to the setback provisions. Subsequently, I am advising the applicant he will need to revise their request and justification for a setback reduction from 96.67 feet to 21.5 feet. If you are unaware, the DRC meeting for this application has been scheduled for 1:55 pm on Thursday, January 4, 2007. I will be sending out the Draft DRC comments late Tuesday and will include you in their distribution. Have a Happy (and safe) New Year!!! Wayne --- Original Message----- From: David Richardson [mailto:drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: re: Harborage 1 (HlPDP) proposed dock project Dear Wayne, Season's greetings! Hope I now have your correct email address. As we discussed via telephone last week, I will be passing along questions and comments about the (HlPDP) proposal as issues arise prior to your 01/04/2007 meeting. > in the (HlPDP) application material, they make reference to their 11550 linear feet of shoreline". We presume that figure to reflect their Clearwater property width measured at the waterfront property line? Your Development Standards Code referring to Dimensional standards h. SETBACKS ..so states " multi- use private and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single-family or two- family property must be setback a minumum of one-third of the applicant's property width from the adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property. Even though the(HiPDP) makes constant reference to its current 290 foot marina length, SETBACK code language makes specific reference to "property width measured at the waterfront property line". The current Harborage 1 dock setback from my property line violates the intent of your code language no matter whether one uses the 550 linear feet of shoreline language OR their current 290 feet of marina length. 550' equates to a 183 foot setback while 290'equates to a 97 foot setback. > We do need to see both past permits # M10520-80 and #RM35136-04 to determine exactly how SETBACKS and variance requests were handled in 1980 and 2004 respectively. > In the (HlPDP) material submitted , SECTION D written submittal requirements ITEM#2...They are correct in stating'"the value of their condo unit, whose owner will have use rights to the new slip, will increase." Both Realtors and Independent Appraisers will provide financial information to support that both my property and my neighbor's property will be substantially devalued with the presence of a boat moored one foot off my property line. Negative economic impact is a large issue in this case. 1 > In item ##6, the applicant states that no visual impairment nor adverse accoustic conseqence will occur. We beg to differ; SETBACKS were established and are required for the specific purpose of insuring and/or negating the issues of visual impairment,accoustics,personal privacy rights, and peace associated with home ownership are preserved. Wayne, this is an ongoing effort to see that this permit request is not granted so I expect to have additional questions and comments for you shortly. Respectfully, Dave Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLCQISPWest.com 201-323-5717 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [richardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 12:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Harborage 1 proposed dock project memo#4 Wayne In my last note to you on Dec. 21st, I mentioned that we have been monitoring dock space usage at Harborage 1 ever since the Belleair Beach Planning Commission rejected the (H1PDP) variance request in March of 2005. To that point, I have pictures of the (H1PDP) dock space as it appeared on December 4th 2006, several days after their resubmission of the application now in question. I will send them to you when I return to Clearwater. The pictures reflects a 50% usage factor, as it has for the last 20 plus months. Respectfully, Dave Richardson David Richardson Richardson,Runden llc. www.RRCompany.com richardson@rrcompany.com 201-323-5717 0 • Wells, Wayne. From: David Richardson [richardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:45 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Harborage1 (1-11 PDP) proposed dock project note#3 December 21,2006 Dear Wayne, Note#3 coming through! I learned from Avery that you have received both my 12/02 and my 12/17 emails. We are continuing to develop additional questions and concerns about the (H1PDP) proposal. > next question centers around lack of current usage of the avilable dock space at Harborage 1. Ever since the Belleair Beach Planning commission's denial of-the permit for essentially the same project now proposed on the Clearwater Beach side of their property, we have monitored the ongoing usage of Harborage 1's available dock space. We have photos that show the usage in 2005 was less than 50% and the usage today twenty months later, remains less than 50%. In our opinion, this current proposal is not based upon NEED for additional boat slips. There are empty slips in Harborage 1, in Harborage 2,in The Moorings, in The Isle of Sand Key and in the Belleair Beach marina (all within easy walking distance of Harborage 1). If one of their residents needed dock space.... plenty is available in the immediate area. Respectfully, David Richardson Richardson,Runden llc. www.RRCompany.com richardson@rrcompany.com 201-323-5717 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: David Richardson [drichardson@ispwest.com] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: re: Harborage 1 (H1PDP) proposed dock project Dear Wayne, Season's greetings! Hope I now have your correct email address. As we discussed via telephone last week, I will be passing along questions and comments about the (H1PDP) proposal as issues arise prior to your 01/04/2007 meeting. > in the (H1PDP) application material, they make reference to their 11550 linear feet of shoreline". We presume that figure to reflect their Clearwater property width measured at the waterfront property line? Your Development Standards Code referring to Dimensional standards h. SETBACKS ..so states " multi- use private and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single-family or two- family property must be setback a minumum of one-third of the applicant's property width from.the adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property. Even though the(H1PDP) makes constant reference to its current 290 foot marina length, SETBACK code language makes specific reference to "property width measured at the waterfront property line". The current Harborage 1 dock setback from my property line violates the intent of your code language no matter whether one uses the 550 linear feet of shoreline language OR their current 290 feet of marina length. 550' equates to a 183 foot setback while 2901equates to a 97 foot setback. > We do need to see both past permits # M10520-80 and #RM35136-04 to determine exactly how SETBACKS and variance requests were handled in 1980 and 2004 respectively. > In the (H1PDP) material submitted , SECTION D written submittal requirements ITEM#2 ... They are correct in stating "the value of their condo unit, whose owner will have use rights to the new slip, will increase." Both Realtors and Independent Appraisers will provide financial information to support that both my property and my neighbor's property will be substantially devalued with the presence of a boat moored one foot off my property line. Negative economic impact is a large issue in this case. > In item #6, the applicant states that no visual impairment nor adverse accoustic conseqence will occur. We beg to differ; SETBACKS were established and are required for the specific purpose of insuring and/or negating the issues of visual impairment,accoustics,personal privacy rights, and peace associated with home ownership are preserved. Wayne, this is an ongoing effort to see that this permit request is not granted so I expect to have additional questions and comments for you shortly. Respectfully, Dave Richardson Richardson,Runden LLC. www.RRCompany.com RRLLC@ISPWest.com 201-323-5717 Page 1 of 1 0 i Wells, Wayne From: david richardson [richardson@rrcompany.com] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 2:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: richardson@rrcompany.com Subject: Harborage 1.1eland Hibbs' resubmitted boat dock/wet dock application December 2, 2006 Wayne .... thank you for taking time this past friday, December 1st to discuss your Department's submittal schedule as it relates to the timetable that will be in place now that Mr. Hibbs has submitted his revised application. We have begun to gather information that we believe your DRC will find informative and useful as you consider the details of Mr. Hibbs' application. In discussions with my neighbors; all six parties are ready to submit sound reasons why this proposed project should not not be approved Our Mooring's Board is reviewing the facts of this application to insure the integrity of property line setbacks and our rights are met. In Mr. Hibbs' initial application leading to the permit, which was approved in error, he failed to provide truthful, complete facts about his project. Example: this project DOES abut a residentially zoned property; In your question Previous Permits, Mr. Hibbs failed to divulge that he presented a "close to identical" project to the Bellair Beach Planning Commission in 2005 and. it was unanimously denied on tuesday,March 15, 2005; most importantly... Mr Hibbs answered NO to your question regarding the necessity for a variance ...all the time knowing that a variance would be required as it was in 2005 in Bellair Beach. Finally, I will call your office on January 3rd to determine the exact time of your 1/4/2007 DRC meeting as I plan on taking you up on your offer to attend that meeting. Our community and those most affected by this proposed project are united in our efforts to see that this project is denied. We stand ready to provide you with any additional information you might require as we move down the road. I'm thankful that I returned home on 10/13 and I'm thankful that you were able to determine that Mr. Hibbs' initial permit was issued in error so a stop work order could be issued to prevent this project from getting started. We are prepared to deal with this revised application. Respectfully, David Richardson 1648 Sand Key Estates Court Clearwater, Fla 33767 727-593-0644 201-323-5717 mobile David M Richardson Richardson, Runden Ilc. www.RRCompany.com Richardson@RRCompany.com 973-239-9330 201-323-5717 mobile 12/3/2006 DAVID M. RICHARDSON 9RIGINAL 1648 SAND KEY ESTATES COUMCEMQ CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 ?:• IV NOV 06 ??Js PLANNING Dki?A,:;v;t,:ir n CITYOF CLEARiNATER • /10,5'/ ? LOOS"?' Oro W40- oll? CS ?- 3-61 G? ?? Qot- a c ? !^r?4 a .k tom. A-0/- 4,r t-- --/-o to ---?? KClrl Itc G.s, G.r