The URL can be used to link to this page

INTERLOCAL SERVICE DELIVERY AGREEMENT 2003-2004tn~NS OF COSI BAS-FL Q~c ~~9m (2003) F O `~qhS OF P UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau n f Washington, DC 20233-0001 ZJJ OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR a~~ ~ -- ~-----~___March 24, 2003 SEQ001-01369 ~ ~ ~` v .r ~'~ ~ ~~ ~~~ I,~II~~~II~I~~~I~I~I~I~~I~~I.~II~~~I~I~~II..I..I II..I.I,I~~I MAYOR CLEARWATER CITY PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758-4748 ~DlJ~A TLIG I'IIPCr`T~D i. ~. i~i~ vv v~ i~ U.S. CENSUS BUREAU ~o°~ ss ~: N ~~~ l 0 2043 ~~~RKP ATTCRN~ Y Our records show we have not received a response to the 2003 Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS) that we mailed to you. The U.S. Census Bureau will use the results of this survey to ensure that we have the correct name and boundary for the presentation of data from our American Community Survey and Population Estimates Programs. Please complete the BAS forms; verify and, if necessary, update the boundary shown on the map(s); and return both to us promptly so that we can identify your entity properly. If you have added territory that extends beyond the coverage of the map(s) you received, please write to or telephone the Census Bureau at~i~~~p~E[~ telephone number shown below. KK ,/GG VV The Census Bureau is grateful to you for your help. Sincerely, Charles Louis Kincannon Director pNK 1 i 2003 PI„pNNING D ~ W~~RT CITY 4F C u~iilili~iililiiiiilllilfi~ 1 12 000 12875 For further information, please write or telephone U.S. Census Bureau National Processing Center ATTN: BAS RETURNS, BLDG. 63A 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, IN 47132 TELEPHONE: 1-800-972-5651 or 5653 USCENSUSBUREAU Helping You Make Informed Decisions WWW.Ce17SUS.gOV -~ISi'JOTASURVEY~ ~- .- .. i.~' ~-:d..: MAR 1 2Q04 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION e '- -•~ ~ • .~. ~' - ~~ ,• ~ r, ~~' ..'f` ~:...-.... _--~.~ .ti's A portion of Lots 7 and 8 in the Northwest I/4 of the Northwest• I/4 of the Southwest I/4 of Section I, Township 29 South, Range 15 Eost, PINELLAS GROVES, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 15 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCE. at the Northwest corner of the Southwest I/4 of Section I, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida; thence S00°08'51"E along the West line of said Section I, 50.00 feet to a point on the Westerly extension of the South right-of-way line of Sunset Point Road (State Road S588); thence S89°06'54"E along said Westerly extension and the South right-of-way line of Sunset Point Road (State Road S588), respectively, a distance of 179.86 feet to the Northwest corner of that certain parcel as shown on the "Alta/Acsm Land Title Survey of a portion of Lots 7 and 8, PINELLAS GROVES" as prepared by Foresight Surveyors, Inc.. file name 11280-BT-I.dwg, last revised on February 13, 2004, same also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue S89°06'54"E, along said South right-of-way line of Sunset Point Road (State Road S588), a distance of 201:.49 feet; thence leaving said South right-of-way line of Sunset Point Road (State Road S588), S00°53'06"W, a distance of 15.75 feet to a point on the Westerly line of a Wetland Conservation Area, as shown on said "Alta/Acsm Land Title Survey; thence along the Westerly line of said Wetland Conservation Area, the following eight (8) courses: (I) thence S12°06'15"W, a distance of 25.90 feet; (2) thence S04°43'52"E, a distance of 44.89 feet; (3) thence S03°22'33"E, a distance of 60.77 feet; (4) thence .S08°02'10"W, a distance of 31.43 feet; (5) thence SOI°45'32"E, a distance of 50.37 feet; (6) thence SIO°34'44"E, a distance of 36.43 feet; (7)•thence S65°18'55"E, a distance of 39.86 feet; (8) thence S85°13'53"E, a distance of 43.15 feet to the South line of the North I/2 of the Northwest I/4 of the Northwest I/4 of the Southwest I/4 of said Section I; thence N89°09'17"W, along said South line of the North I/2 of the Northwest I/4 of the Northwest .I/4 of the Southwest I/4 of said Section I, a distance of 424.29 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Keene Road (County Road 26A); thence leaving said South line of the North I/2 of the Northwest I/4 of the Northwest I/4 of the Southwest I/4 of said Section I, along said Easterly right-of-way line, N00°08'51"W, 132.98 feet; thence leaving said Easterly right-of-way line, S89°06'54"E, a distance of 129.83 feet; thence N00°08'02"W, a distance of 150.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 76,945 square feet or 1.766 acres, more or less. SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH THE GEOMETRY PERTAINING TO THIS DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH ARE SUBJECT TO AN ACCURATE FIELD BOUNDARY SURVEY. THERE CODU) BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING THIS DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH HAVE BEEN PREPARED WITH OR WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE POLICY. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 'OF SUNSET POINT ROAD BEING ASSUMED AS S89'O6'S4"E. ( TITLE: _ FOR: .LEGAL DESCRIP110N AND SKETCH TWO TO ONE, LLC ~U-• ~ C~ 3 /~ D DANA A. WYLLI DATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER NUMBER LS 5874 JOB NUMBER REVISION SECTION TOWNSHIP 11280 ___ 1 29 S RANGE ' SCALE 15 E I 1 " = 100' FORES/GHT SURVEYORS, IND. HYDROGRAPHIC, LAND & CONSTRUCTION SURVEYII'dG 14961-8 58TH STREET NORTH, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33760 PH. (727) 539-7196 FAX (727) 539-0888 LB No.: 5776 3/11/04 I DRAM BY I 11280LS5 dwg , SHof 2 .a. , .. *} a ~' ~.~a ~ y,r .gyp -;~~SIS NOT A SURVEY" ~~ .~ ~, fi ~ . )k ~r ' +i~~ i _/w, ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ c '~ ; ~"f, ' ;i ~ ° 41, ,. ,q f MAR 1 ~1~ 2Q04~w ' , ~ .. ~ r ~ ~~~~• ' ~a ~;~ ~~P~ SSE ~~~~'~'T GRAPHIC SCALE. ;- ~ _ s ~'. y .' ~ r• PAC ~ ~ - ~ ~~.~`~ ~. ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ . `+i ~.. , F NW COR OF SW 1/4 OF SEC 1-TWP29S=RNGISE WESTERLY EXTENSION"rOF SUNSET ~f-0~~~ ~1~Or1D '~ ~'~ ' f ~ . ' S R/VII LINE OF ~ "~ -s h ~' iS~, ' ' SUNSET POINT ROAD~~ ~ ~ -S~TATE'~~ROAD~ ~S588~ ~~(BEARING BASIS)'` (STATE ROAD S568) r~a ~'~ ~~~~ ~~~+ S R/W~LINE _ .; ~ ~. ~. 201 49' ° ' °, ~ se roses4 E ~;~.~r;~, ~ ~...S88'06'54"E ~ `}~ , ~ ~ I I ,3 ,~' tt~ ~ 3 " ,~ ~ - ` = U I ~ ~ ~'~~ rz - ~ ~ ~"N W N ~ .: VWI N ' ~ ~ V) N i aF .. /y ~` .889'06 54.. Es .. t N-3.o ° +o' o c' n , ~. , o ~ ~: u (j ~ ~ ..3 12983', i.,} ww ga' ~a,'~ ~~~~°r>r,,~a ~ 1" WW ~ 1; ~~~~ ~ o z z ,~r ~ a¢ 4 w }~ Y' (mc+° ~~ .r ''"'30~,INGRESS EGRESS ~ ~ ~ zw$' + „s. 1 / W O ~ ,r 0 a o a' Pp M ,'t EASEMENT, PER a LEASE f' ~ o ~ ra` V f - I O'- ~ ORB X4128' PG 4B 1 v+'~ ~ •'~r, _ ~ r ~'' t ~ ~~ I. _' N89b9'17rW` ' ~ i ~' n. ` ` ~ ,,.. 424.29 3 ~,, r ~ '~ , ' g, W ' , ~ ~ ~ :10'.OE/LIE PER , ' ~~ ~} a ;~~, N . 50 ~ ~i; t +`ORB 4086,' PG .21.2 ' I ~,. rcti ~ ( <V W I ~' ~`?* ~ ~ ' ? ? S :LINE OF THE N~1/2y0F e ~ O• tY 4" z k~ ~ ,' _ ~w ya THE.NW 1/4.0FF7}IE~NW y ..y. ~ ~ ! ; ' , ~ I , ~ ao o-p'I n p cs 1I4'; OF THE SW ,1 /4'~OF ~ ~'~p ~ 15'(P)--I If . ~ ,~ r t ~ o ~ a F ~ o. ~ SEC <1-TWP29S RNG15Ei ~:. Ir-"` M- ~ '~ -35.00 xLESS-OUT~w. ~ . x - z z .. " , i.. ,C ~ ~° ,; I f ; SUBJECT'" AREA -.: a I ` ABBREVIA110NS LEGEND ,<~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ .) ~ ~ is , COR = ~ CORNER ~ I . ' ~ 76,945' SQUARE FEET - ~', ' DE =DRAINAGE EASEMENT > '~ ' ~ ' " 2-- ''(1.766 ACRES).:MORE OR "LESS ~B = LICENSED BUSINESS ` ~ `=' ~, - , i _ ,_~ ., LS UCENSED'SURVEYOR ~~ r `~:., , ty ¢ `.:~ 0%A ~ =OVERALL . ' .- ~ € ORB = OFFICIAL:RECORDS BOOK ~., . ~ ~ ~ : ~ ° ~ . y , Y ~; ; J I...:. p O. O L1: y v 0 .LINES^TABLE • ?` ° LINE "BEARING , , DISTANCE Lt S00'5.3''06 W ' :15J5' L2 S12'06':15,W' ~,=.25:90''-: L3 . ; S04'43':52.E 44.89" ' L4 ~ '; ~;SO'3'22'33'E. ~`6'0:77'~ ` L5 .: S'08'02'10:'W. r~ 31:43' ~•L6 S01'45°32;'E,. ~, 50:3Z'': , ' L7 ':510'34'44"E". =36:43' 'L8 S65'18'S5"E ';39;8fi' :`, L9 885'13'83"E ~ 43.15' L10 S00'08'S1 "E- 50.00'. (P) =PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 15 (DATA ~::- R8: =PLAT BOOK is PG =PAGE(S) ' POB =,POINT OF BEGINNING POC ° ~= POINT OF'. COMMENCEMENT - R/W _ RIGHT OF,WAY RNG , RANGE SEC =",SECTION . (S1) =Alto/Acsm Lond Title Survey of a portion of Lots 7 and 8, PINELLAS-GROVES""as' prepared by Foresight Surveyors, Inc.; file ' name 11280-BT-t.dwg, last revised on` ,' February 13,'2004; TWP =TOWNSHIP . UE =UTILITY EASEMENT ~ 5EE SHEET: 1; FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION y ~ THE'GEOMETRY PERTAINING. TO"THIS DESCRIPTION':ANO'SKETCH ARE SUBJECT'TO AN ACCURATE FIELD BOUNDARY SURVEY. p THERE COULD 8E AOOITiONAI RESTRICTIONS .AFFECTING THIS DESCRIPTION ANO SKETCH IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. C e Q. ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH-HAVE BEEN~PREPARED. MATH .OR WITHOUT THE BENEFlT OF A TITLE- POLICY. ~ DEARINGS ARE .BASED ON THE SOUTH"-RIGHT=OF-WAY UNE 'OF SUNSET POINT ROAD BEING ASSUMED AS S89'06'S4"E. TITLE:. FOR: - .LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND"' SKETCH ; TWO TO ONE, ; LLC ~:. N.. _. _-, _.,- E w U; ~ FORES%GHT SURVEYORS, INC. ~ . o.. ,- ` (i(/ 3 /I ~ HYDROCRAPHIC, LAND & CONSTRUCTION SURVEYIIVG ` :~' ~ Forese- ht 0. 'DANA A. WYLLIE DA 5 RvEY R5~ 14561-B 58TH STREET NORTH, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33760 ' -p PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER ~ PH. (727) 539-7196 FAX (727) 539-0888 LB No.: 5776 ' c NUMBER LS 5874 .. ~ I ` J JOB NUMBER REVISION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE SCALE DATE DRAWN BY FILE NAME SHEET ', . ~ 1 1280 ~ ~ ___ 1 29 S 15 E 1 " = 100' 3/ 11 /04 FTM 1 1280LS5.dwg 2 of 2 ~: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _ PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 COMMISSIONERS KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL-CHAIRMAN SUSAN LATVALA -VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS JOHN MORRONI ROBERT B. STEWART - BARBAAASHEEN TODD KENNETH T WELCH August 19, 2003 Mr. Marc Mariano City of Clearwater P:O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 - ~~ ~°~ ~~ P ~3 . ~uC r~ U to ®~.p~~M~~'~ P~~~©~ ~`~R~AT~~ CAN Subject: Interlocal Service Delivery Project Dear Mr. Mariano: Thank you for joining with us to complete the 'new Chapter 163, F.S., requirements relating to intergovernmental coordination and service delivery. Our hope is that we can work together to meet the project requirements as easily as possible, as well as provide for meaningful results. The purpose of this letter is to convey as much information as we can right now and let you know the different ways we hope to coordinate and communicate with you over the next 4 months in order to~meet the January 1, 2004; deadline for having a final report submitted to the Department of Community Affairs. - We have worked with our -information technology staff to provide a location on the County's website for sharing information on this project. That location is: www.pinellascounty.org/plan/interlocal. -From that location, click on the Interlocal Service Delivery Project option. Please check it out soon and' see what you think. . We have also established, with your help, a list of contacts for the project. This list of contacts will be posted on the webpage location above (if you do not want your email address and contact information available on the website please feel free to contact Samantha Shorr-Zigante of my staff and we will remove it). The draft inventory of agreements, special districts information, a draft report outline, and a link to Pinellas Assembly information will also be available from the website location. We will also have a "blank" inventory page online for you to access and fill out with your own inventory information. '~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LOCATION: 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750, Clearwater, Florida 33755 TELEPHONE: (727) 464-8200 FAX: (727) 464-8201 PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 315 Court Street - Clearwater, FL 33756 "Pinellas County is ari Equal Opportunity Employer" •Member-Pinellas Partnership-for a Drug Free Workplace ~~ printed on recycled paper ` - '. ; . . - • Paget `.. ~ ~ . . Service IDeliyery Project _ • - Augusf_ T9, 2003 - . .: ~ ~ ~ - • •~~ What we-would like. everyone to~do,-if you:haven't started already,_ is to inventory the .agreements your'cityor - . agency. has-,with another~city, the county, or another agency "related to providing one of the identified services in ' - -the new statutory requirements : (i;e., -.education, .sanitary • sewer', public safety, ,solid, waste, drainage; potable . ~" water, parks and recreation. and trarisporfation): Some of theses agreements may already be included in the~draft ~ = inventory attached. `If not; this information wilf need: to be added to the inventory.,. Please take's look at the. format, on'the attached draft inventory document to use as a model: ~ Once the inventory. is complete, and all the ; additions~and-edits have been•made, we will.finalze it aril move onto the next phase of the project:. - .. t. , • _ _ - ._ , To -make rt easy,.°you; can go~ to the website' atached to theeinventoryveY ory ,form to> fill• in, your inventory- , ;' information., Or, you can use the blank pages.at ou can then email your infoimation back, or send. it, or fax it (464-8201). Edits to. the existing inventory will need to'made on the hard copy or you, `can give us a call-and`maybe we can..figure out.the.ehange,over the,phorie:..Also for:your information, a draft' outline forJthe complete report•is,attached for your review - . While we do expect to°do a lot> of the' coordmation_via email, email, or •online, we thought it would be a good idea • to go ahead and•schedule a~meeting for September -to go overwhat,.has-been assembled by then.° In addition; at . . that meeting we can.discuss°the next'.stcp.of the project:, identification"of possible duplicationYor deficiencies in', service delivery,. and a strategy for completing that part,of the,Rcport. Please-put. September.,15, at.10:00 a.m., in the Pinellas County Planning~Department conference room on your-calendars as a-,tentative meeting date~arid ,' time. ~ : .. , , ..: .. Please feel free to contact me; Liz Freeman or ~Samaitha Sfiorr-Zigante at` 464.-8200- (or email.. us) with' any . questions or comments: We-will be in touch soon! . ,. -. ~ ~ ~ ~ , Sincerely,: ~ ~ ... - - ,. r ,; ~ ~ ' ,. F •- , Gordon Beardslee, General: Planning Administrator ` ' - ~ ~ , - ` .Pinellas County Planning Department:... • . - '_ '• .. _4 . - - _ ~ - ~• ~, . , • , SERVICE DELIVERY IN PINELLAS COUNTY AN INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT OF SERVICE DELIVERY AGREEMENTS OVERVIEW OF PINELLAS COUNTY Introductory discussion providing an overview of the county and its makeup Figure 1 identifies and locates each local government, and summarizes its land area and population Short overview of the 2003 Pinellas Assembly and its relationship to Ch. 163 requirements DISCUSSION OF EXISTING COORDINATION MECHANISMS Table 1: Municipalities and Special Districts located in Pinellas County Short discussion, by subject area, and maps (figures) of various service areas INVENTORY OF AGREEMENTS Table 2: Existing and Proposed Interlocal Agreements in Pinellas County DUPLICATION OF SERVICES Table 3: Identified Duplication of Services and Facilities (25 separate tables) Discussion, including - if identifiable - potential strategies for elimination of duplication SERVICE DELIVERY DEFICIENCIES Table 4: Identified Deficiencies in Services and Facilities (25 separate tables) Discussion, including - if identifiable - potential strategies for elimination. of deficiencies AGREEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE UPDATED Table 4: Needed Updates SUMMARY OF RELATED FINDINGS FROM THE PINELLAS ASSEMBLY In particular, review information on: public safety, recreation and transportation APPENDICES -additional information Genplan/service delivery outline web DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory ;. ~' ;'Service '~ - `.Psrty.l °~~ . ~ ~• '; ~Psrty 2 ~' . - Type of Agreemen~ -Effective Date of Eapi~ation Date : Ilescription/Notes ; _~` ~ . ,, `~ - ~ ~„ ~ ~, ' ' Agreem ent o[ Agre~men 5 ~ ` .. . r T ~~ a ;. 4 . ....n' _ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~. •. ... 8/18/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory -' ~ Service' ' _ Party 1 : " ` ~-, ~ Pant 2 ~ . -' Type"ot Agreemen `Effective Date of Ezpiratiou~ hate DescriptiottJNoteii t , ~" ~ i - * _ ~' -'~ . Agreement` .. of Agree'ineet ~ E;~-~ Education Pinellas School Board ILA 9/10/96 30 days notice Provides an alternative process and location criteria for reviewing a proposed public educational facility and site plan. Education School Board Pinellas ILA 5/1/03 N/A Joint School Board/ Local Government Coordination Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 11/1/99 N/A Clearwater is providing wastewater treatement and wants Safety Harbor to regulate disposal by adopting and enforcing sewer regulations. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Redington Shores ILA 3/1/01 25 years County to treat the Town's wastewater. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 10/22/76 35 years Clearwater to take wastewater from Safety Harbor. Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 6/23/00 10 years Largo to service parts of St. Petersburg. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 8/1/88 7/31/2018 Parties h 3 previous contracts: 2 dated 10/22/76 an at d 9/23/81. This agreement permits Safet arbor to ~ cr ase its sewage capacity. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Tarpon Springs ILA 8/8/78 1/1/2 'o define the boundaries of sanitary sewer service real. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Indian Shores a anon 0/12/82 N/ ~ ellas chase lndian Shores sanitary sewege greemen system. Sanitary Sewer Clear Lar I 0/1/83 0/1/1988 (+ To create a common sanitary sewer service automatic boundary. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Dunedin Clearwater ILA 1 I /28/79 1 1/28/84 (+ 5 To define the boundaries of wholesale and retail automatic sanitary sewer service areas. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Madeira Beach ILA 7/22/69 30 years Madeira pays portion of debt on South Cross Bayou Pollution Control Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas North Redington ILA 3/14/72 30 years N.Redington to pay portion of the debt on the Beach South Cross Bayou Pollution Control Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. Sanitary Sewer Oldsmar Pinellas ILA 12/11/79 20 years NE Pinellas County Sewer and Waste Authority, Inc. also signed agreement. Oldsmar treats wastewater for County. 8/18/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service ° . Party 1 : `~ : ~ pA n _ ~ ~ ; rty ... < ~ ~- 'iWpe of Agreement ' Effeciive Date bf 'Et[pirition Aste ',..' `; Description/Notes t ,, . .~` Agreement - of Agreement x j _ . - r ~ y ~ _ Sanitary Sewer Oldsmar Pinellas County ILA 3/19/98 20 years Service areas established. Oldsmar agrees to treat 550,000 gpd. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 3/12/97 30 years St. Pete to provide wastewater treatment to the parts of Cateway Center within Pinellas Park (Gateway Center Development). Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Belleair Beach ILA 9/25/01 25 yrs. Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Belleair ILA Spring 2003 No expiration Belleair seeks to turn over its infrastructure to the date County. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Indian Rocks Beach ILA 9/25/01 25 years Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Treasure Island ILA 1/3/84 1/3/2009 St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater Flow from Treasure Island at the Northwest Treatment Plant. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg St. Pete Beach ILA 2/19/85 St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from St. Pete Beach at the Northwest Treatment Plant. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg South Pasadena ILA 12/27/74 12/27/2004 South Pasadena will pay St. Petersburg for transmission of sanitary sewage. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas St. Petersburg ILA 11/11/87 mutual agreement County requested to discharge sewage wastes created in its Ft. De Soto Park. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Redington Shores ILA 3/1/01 25 years Sanitary Sewer Pinellas St Petersburg ILA 6/26/64 40 years St. Petersburg will treat wastewater from unincorporated areas of the County -Bear Creek. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Gulfport Amendment 2/10/70 5 years Gulfport was transporting wastewater from un- incorporated areas; it intended to annex to St. Petersburg (there is 1 agreement and 2 amendments for this). Public Safety Pinellas Medical Direction Contract 3/7/01 12/29/2003 The contractor will provide professional medical (Emergency Contractor (doctor) direction to the EMS system. Service) Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Tarpon Springs Fire Protection 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. 8/18/2003 i DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Ser"yice- + ; r~. ~ Pa 1 ` ~ rty r Pa 2 = ~ ~ ,~ -; rtY '~ - of ..... ype Agreemen ;Effective Date of Ezpirstioo Date` • _, t, , ,~ . • Deserlption/Ntites C ' ~ . - ~ ' ~ . ~` ~' ~ .'. - Agreement of Agreement x ~ t a, ~ , f Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas South Pasadena Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Safety Harbor Fire Protection 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Kenneth City Lealman Fire & Fire Protection 5/9/96 9/30/96 (+ Lealman Fire and Rescue to provide fire protection Rescue, Inc. Services Agreement automatically services to Kenneth City. renewed for 3 yrs., ending 9/30/02) Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas East Lake Fire & Fire Protection 10/14/99 90 days notice To define the obligations and responsibilities of the Rescue, Inc. Services Agreement parries with respect to the provision of fire protection services in the unincorporated East Lake areas of the County. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas East Lake Fire & Fire Protection 4/30/97 30 days notice Provision of fire protection service by East Lake Rescue, Inc. Services Agreement Fire and Rescue to Brooker Creek Preserve. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Dunedin Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Clearwater Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Belleau Bluffs Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas 5 Fire Service 1LA 10/16/90 90 days notice Automatic Aid agreement (closest units respond). Districts Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Fire Districts Resolution N/A Creates various districts (District resolutions on file). 8/18/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory ' Service ~ ,. . M ~', 'Party 1 ~~ ,. ~ ~: ~' .` Party 8 ~: :: , , Type of Agreeinen ~ ~Effect[ve~Date~oU .Etpiration Date _ ~'.> - DeserlpUw'NNotea -`"~ .; _ _ w` .. ,. w AgSeement - , of Agreement . ~ Public Safety (Law Sheriff Belleair Bluffs ILA 8/8/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Indian Rocks Beach ILA 12/2/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). L:nforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Madeira Beach ILA 11/1/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff North Redington ILA 9/12/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Beach Public Safety (Law Sheriff Oldsmar ILA 11/1/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (law Sheriff Redington Beach ILA 8/20/02 5- one year terms Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Safety Harbor II_A 12/3/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Seminole ILA 8/27/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Dunedin ILA 1/20/95 4 years w/ Enforcement) renewal option Public Safety (Law Sheriff Dunedin ILA 9/13/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewal of 1995 agreement). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff South Pasadena ILA 11/1/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Solid Waste Pinellas Cities Court Judgment N/A N/A By law, the County has the right and duty to dispose of solid waste. There is no need for interlocal agreements. As for solid waste service, cities can implement their own collection and delivery to the County's disposal facilities. 8/18/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory ;' "'Service - ~"party 1~ '~? r °-: `°-Party 2 " Type of Agreemeo ''°EtCecttve Date of iFipiration 15ate Descrlptlon/Notes " . ~' ~, { Y;. ~ .. ~ k ~R" i i %5Y J~ :~ Agreement of Agreement ,' Sfi, ~'~ aj ,.~'; ,}_' - Solid Waste Pinellas Cities ILA 6/25/99 9/30/2004 Agreement regarding recycling grants. Parties (Recycling) agree to continue to work together to reach the goals of the Pinellas County Recycling Committee. The agreement details how grant money, if any, will be distributed and for what uses. Drainage Pinellas All Cities 6/16/2005 Pinellas, all cities, FDOT, and Pinellas Park Water Management District providing for joint control of pollutants from public or private lands within respective jurisdictions Potable Water Pinellas Oldsmar ILA 12/28/99 5/14/2005 0.5-1.0 mgd wholesale agreement. This water (Water Supply) would be used by Oldsmar to service area outlined in exhibit A. Potable Water Pinellas Dunedin 1[_A 10/6/92 5 years 1 mgd max wholesale agreement to service area in (Water Supply) exhibit A. The minimum is 1 mg/month. Potable Water Pinellas Safety Harbor ILA 9/9/97 5 years 1.2-2.2 mgd wholesale agreement. (Water Supply) Potable Water Pinellas Tarpon Springs ILA 12/1/92 5 years 1.6513.0 mgd wholesale agreement. (Water Supply) Potable Water Pinellas Pinellas Park ILA 1/28/88 20 years 3.7-7.5 mgd wholesale agreement. (Water Supply) Potable Water Pinellas Largo ILA 1/25/72 N/A Agreement allowing Pinellas to operate Largo's (Water Supply) water system. Potable Water Pinellas Clearwater ILA 3/19/76 30 years Expires 9/30/05. This is a 10 mgd wholesale (Water Supply) agreement. Potable Water Pinellas Kenneth City Resolution N/A N/A Resolution approving the purchase of water for the (Water Supply) Town from Pinellas County. Potable Water Pinellas Largo 1LA 10/1/75 N/A This agreement transfers the right to operate (Water Supply) Largo's existing water system to Pinellas County. The County will pay Largo for outstanding debt and debt serviced. Potable Water Pinellas Belleair 1LA 5/7/96 5 years This is an agreement for up to. l mgd of (Water Supply) "emergency service (wholesale)." The new agreement is an emergency exchange service. Potable Water St. Petersburg Oldsmar ILA 5/18/79 2 years notice ~Yholesale agreement. Oldsmar will buy water from (Water Supply) St. Petersburg. There is a reference to Gulfport buying St. Pete water. 8/I 8/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory ~'- Service Pnfty 1 ~ r;. r r~ ct Party 2 rr : r. Type of Agreemen Effective Dste of Eiplration Bate ~ `' ( ~ r De'scfiption/Nofes c' ?-'`: r` ~'s`~'c Agreemeat bfAgreement ,r }~~~ ' Potable Water Pinellas, Pasco, & St Pete, Tampa, & ILA 5/1/98 Unanimous Establishes Tampa Bay Water or West Coast (Water Supply) 1-lillsborough NPR Consent Regional Water Supply Authority who is the sole supplier to member governments. There are concessions for certain members to keep some property. Potable Water St. Petersburg Gulfport ILA 10/6/88 30 yr. Term (+ St. Petersburg will sell potable water to Gulfport. (Water Supply) automatic renewal each yr.) Potable Water St. Petersburg South Pasadena Resolution 1/11/96 1/11/2001 St. Petersburg to furnish potable water to South (Water Supply) Pasadena for a period of 5 years. Parks and Pinellas Madeira Beach ILA (/25/83 30 days notice City to operate and maintain facility. Profits from Recreation operation of the parking meters will be split 50/50. Parks and Pinellas St. Pete Beach 1LA 5/19/87 90 days notice City to install and maintain parking meters at beach Recreation access. The County will install and maintain parking spaces. City and county will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and Pinellas Indian Shores ILA 2/14/95 90 days notice City to install and maintain parking meters at beach Recreation access. The county will install and maintain parking spaces. City and county will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 11/20/73 N/A The agreement outlines sale and acquisition of Recreation parcels to develop Sand Key Park. The agreement outlines duties and obligations of both Clearwater and the County. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 1/28/86 90 days notice City to provide lifeguards and first-aid for the Recreation County Park on Sand Key. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 7/25/84 90 days notice City to install and maintain parking meters at Sand Recreation Key Park. The County will install and maintain parking spaces. City and county will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. 8/ 18/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory $t<tvlce - Party'1 ~ ~ Fam 2 "` Tfpe ofAgreemen Fttectlve Date of: Explrfttlou'Date ` ~`° DeticriPfionlNAteS' ,`~ ~ ' Agreement Q ' of Agi-eemeot ~~'~'~ r Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 9/28/82 N/A Development and management of Sand Key Park. Recreation Parks and Pinellas St. Petersburg ILA 8/11/87 20 years City to provide the County with sewer service for Recreation Ft. De Soto Park. Parks and Pinellas Hillsborough ILA 11/23/99 30 days notice Outlines operation and maintenance requirements Recreation of each county for the Friendship Trail Bridge Parks and Pinellas/Hillsborough FDOT ILA 10/15/97 N/A Transfer ownership ofthe Old Gandy Bridge to the Recreation two counties for the Friendship Trail Bridge. Parks and Pinellas SWFWMD/ School ILA 8/4/76 County Default or Construction and management of water Recreation Board 60 Days Notice b management project and nature study/ recreational District facility. The agreement has three amendments. Transportation Pinellas Pinellas MPO MOU 9/8/77 60 days notice Pinellas agrees to provide the MPO with support Facilities services. 'T'ransportation Pinellas MPO School Board MOA 10/22/78 Can only be Ensures participation in transportation planning. Facilities terminated by the School Board. Transportation Pinellas MPO Hillsborough ILA 6/21/05 30 days notice Only amendment in file 3/25/00 (HIV Facilities transportation service 3/1/99). Planning Pinellas St. Petersburg ILA Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Pinellas Park [LA 5/2/72 N/A Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Clearwater ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (1/14/92 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Dunedin ILA 7/6/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (2/21/95 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Oldsmar ILA 8/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (9/13/9.9 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Safety Harbor 1LA 7/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (3/24/92 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Pinellas Park ILA 10/23/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Largo ILA 10/23/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Tarpon Springs ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (10/10/89 original a reement . 8/I 8/2003 MUNICIPALITY SERVICE DELIVERY CONTACTS MUNICIPALITY CONTACT NAME E-Mail Phone Number TOWN OF BELLEAIR Steve Cottrell tmanae tam aba .rr.com (727) 588-3773 CITY OF BELLEAIR BEACH CITY OF BELLEAIR Debra Sullivan debras(a~tampabay.rr.com (727) 584-2151 BLUFFS TOWN OF BELLEAIR Mayor John Robertson No E-Mail (727) 593-9296 SHORE CITY OF CLEARWATER Marc Mariano (727) 562-4587 Gina Clayton, Long Range gclayton@clearwater-fl.com Plannin Mgr. CITY OF DUNEDIN Jeff Dow dow dunedinfl.net (727) 298-3197 CITY OF GULFPORT CITY OF INDIAN Katherine Burbridge kburbridge cr,ci.indian-rocks.fl.us (727) 517-0404 ROCKS BEACH TOWN OF INDIAN Marsha Register, Town Clerk Mre ig stl cr,tampabay.rr.com (727) 595-4020 Ext. SHORES 26 TOWN OF KENNETH Muriel Whitman kencity(a~ tenet (727) 544-6655 CITY CITY OF LARGO CITY OF MADEIRA Paula Cohen pcohen(a,ci.madeira-beach.fl.us (727) 391-9951 BEACH TOWN OF NORTH Sharon Proehl nrb.fl(~mindsprin~.com (727) 391-4848 REDINGTON BEACH Richard Bennett CITY OF OLDSMAR Greg Scoville, Planning Director (813) 749-1121 CITY OF PINELLAS J. Schelling jschelling,(a~pinellas-prk.com (727) 541-0706 PARK TOWN OF REDINGTON Larry Bittner rha11020@tampabay.rr.com (727) 391-3875 BEACH TOWN OF REDINGTON Mike Nadeau bldgdept(a~townofredingtonshores.com (727) 397-5538 SHORES CITY OF SAFETY Ron Pianta, Assistant City rpianta(a~cityofsafetyharbor.com (727) 724-1555 HARBOR Manager Ron Rinzivillo rrinzivillo cit ofsafet harbor.com CITY OF ST. PETE Jerry Speece jspeece(a,stpetebeach.org (727) 363-9266 BEACH MUNICIPALITY SERVICE DELIVERY CONTACTS (continued) CITY OF David Goodwin, Assistant dave~oodwin(a~stpete.org (727) 892-5001 ST. PETERSBURG Director Development Services CITY OF SEMINOLE Mark Ely mel ci.seminole.fl.us (727) 391-0204 CITY OF SOUTH Wilbur Cox wcox(~ci.south-pasadena.fl.us (727) 343-4192 PASADENA Linda Hallas legal@south-pasadena.fl.us (727) 347-4171 CITY OF TARPON Renea Vincent, Director Planning rvincent(a~ci.tarpon-sprin s~ (727) 942-5611 SPRINGS & Zoning CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND TAMPA BAY REGIONAL Avera Wynne avera(u~tbrpc.org (727) 570-51 S 1 PLANNING COUNCIL DESIGNATED CONTACTS FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS East Lake-Tarpon Special Fire Control District Jeffre S. Parks elfri hotmail.com 727 784-8668 Greater Seminole Area Timothy C. Schuler, Staff S ecial Recreation District Counsel tim lotcs.com 727 398-0011 Lealman Special Fire Control Dist Richard E. Graham re raham tenet 727 526-5650 Palm Harbor Special Fire Control and Rescue District James An le, Fire Chief 'an le almharborfd.com 727 784-0454 PC Educational Facilities Authorit James T. Lan 727 864-8311 PC Emergency Medical Services Authorit C. T. "Chuck" Kearns ckearns co. inellas.fl.us 727 582-2000 Pinellas Park Management District Richard Kusmiercz k info pwmd.com 727 528-8022 Tampa Bay Sports Authorit Chair erson 727 464-7250 Pinellas Suncoast Fire & Rescue District John Leah 'r leah ahoo.com 727 595-1117 Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authorit Ro er Sweene rsweene sta.net 727 530-9921 Paula Dye,Chief pdye@tampabaywater.org Environmental Planner Tam a Ba Water Dr. Donald Polmann d olmann tam aba ater.or 727 796-2355 Southwest Florida Water Marra ement District Richard Owen richard.owen swfwrnd.state.fl.us 352 79fi-7211 COMMISSIONERS KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL- cFIAIRMAN SUSAN LATVALA -VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS JOHN MORRONI RbBERT B. STEWART BARBARA SHEEN TODD KENNETH L WELCH July 25, 2003 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . ~ - PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA _ 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 Cyndi Tarapini, Director'of Planning CITY OF CLEARWATER - P.O. BOX 4748 - CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 ` Re: Interlocal Service Delivery Project and Requirements Dear Ms. Tarapini: Attached please find the Department of Community Affairs Cruidelines for Preparing the Interlocal Service Delive~greement Report, which was not included with our July 23 letter. We apologize for the. inconvenience! Sincerely, ` .i Z~.=~ B an K. Smith, Director 'nellas County Planning Department Enclosure cc: City Managers ~' "' JUL 2 ~ 111~~3 ~. . _ ~ RTM~t~t-~ P~N~1tNG ,a~~ ~wATE~., C~~ ~~ ~~~ F:\U5ERS\CENDOCS\BCC\Service Del Lettet#2 July 25, 2003.BSgg.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 315 Court Street LOCATION: 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750, Clearwater, Florida 33755 ~ Clearwater, FL 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 464-8200 FAX: (727) 464-8201 - "Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" •Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace ~~ printed on recycled paper" Guidelines for Preparing the Interlocal Service-Delivery Agreement Report Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning State Planning Initiatives July 2003 Page 1 of I S TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary of Statutory Requirement 2. Background 3. Overview of Guidelines 4. Report Preparation Process and Format Step 1: Prepare a Master List of Service Providers Step 2: Describe Existing Service Delivery Arrangements Step 3: Compile the Existing Interlocal Agreements Step 4: Identify Duplication of Services Step 5: Identify Service-Delivery Deficits Step 6: Identify Needed Updates 5. Action by DCA Upon Receipt of Report 6. Amendment of Intergovernmental Coordination Element 7. Process Summary 8. Sample Interlocal Agreement Report Work Program Attachments A. Sections 163.3177(6)(h)6., 7. and 8., F.S. B. Map of Reporting Counties and Regional Planning Areas C. Table of County, Municipal and Special District Reporting Partners Page 2 of l5 1. Summary of Statutory Requirement: Chapter ?002-?96, Laws of Florida, added ~~ctions 163.3177(6)(h)6., 7. and 8., F.S., requiring all counties having a population of greater than 100.000. and the municipalities and special districts ~~~ithin those counties to prepare a report (Report) which identifies all existing or proposed interlocal service-delivery agreements regarding the following community services: • education • sanitary sewer • public safety • solid waste • drainage • potable water • parks and recreation and • transportation facilities. The Report must identify any deficits or duplication, whether capital or operational, in the provision of these services within the county. Thus, the Report consists of two sections. The first section should include an inventory ofservice-delivery agreements and, the second section, an identification of any deficits or duplication in the provision of services within the jurisdiction of the county, municipality or special district. The Report must be submitted to the Department of Community Affairs (Department) by January 1, 2004. Within six months of receipt of the Report, the Department, in cooperation with the applicable regional planning council, must coordinate a meeting of all local governments required to prepare a Report to discuss the Reports and potential strategies to remedy any identified deficiencies or duplication. After the regional meeting, each local government must amend its comprehensive plan's intergovernmental coordination element based on the findings in the report. Attachment A is a copy of sections 163.3177(6)(h)6., 7. and 8., F.S., establishing the interlocal service-delivery agreement report requirement. 2. BackEround: This statutory requirement grew out of the findings of the Commission on Local Government II (Commission). The twenty-one member Commission was created in 1996 to suggest statutory and constitutional changes regarding the powers, financing and service delivery capacity of local governments. The Commission noted that only limited revenues can be raised through property taxes and, thus, local governments increasingly turn to fees, special assessments, special districts, municipal service taxing units (MSTUs), and municipal service benefit unit (MSBUs). There is no mechanism for coordinating or choosing among these competing service providers and the Commission reported "each area usually had its own set of service deliverers depending on history and happenstance. In one area, a special district might gradually expand its functions until it was aquasi-city. In another area, services might be provided by the county and financed by MSTUs. Elsewhere, cities might have contracts to provide services to an unincorporated area, or, conversely, the county might have Page 3 of I S contracts to deliver services to various cities. In the end, duplication became commonplace." The Commission concluded that "[t]his proliferation of bureaucracy increases the cost and complexity of local government, reduces accountability, and causes widespread intergovernmental conflict." This duplication prevents the efficient delivery of services through economies of scale. A complete copy of the Commission's final report is located on the Department's website at www.dca.state.fl.us/FDCP/DCP/servicedelivery/servicedelivery htm. The legislation that was adopted in 2002 requires an inventory of interlocal agreements as a first step in the coordination and management of service-delivery responsibilities to reduce overall costs and increase governmental efficiency through the avoidance of duplication. Secondly, the legislation requires each jurisdiction to identify any deficits or duplication in the provision of services within its jurisdiction. The cooperation needed to evaluate interlocal agreements and prepare the Report should foster communication among local service-delivery providers. It is expected that the resulting process of increased communication and cooperation will lead to the realization that service delivery can be improved and that more efficient ways can be found for the delivery of services by eliminating duplications, creating new service-delivery arrangement as necessary, identifying agreements that need updating, and consolidating services where it make sense to do so. Thus, the Report should be prepared in a manner that fosters local governments working together in building infrastructure and delivering services. 3. Overview of Guidelines: These Guidelines explain who must prepare the Report and recommends procedures for preparing the Report. The Report should provide an inventory of the service providers in the county and existing and proposed agreements related to the services listed in the statute. The Report should identify unnecessary duplication and gaps in the existing service delivery arrangements. The Report should describe possible options to remedy the identified inefficiencies in the delivery of public services. Questions regarding these Guidelines may be address to Mike McDaniel, State Planning Initiatives Administrator, at 850-487-4545 and Walker Banning, Principal Planner, at 850-922-1785. E-mail contacts are mike.mcdaniel(a,dca.state.fl.us and walker.banning_na,dca.state.fl.us. Page 4 of 15 4. Report Preparation Process and Format Step l: Prepare a Master List of Service Providers: The statute applies to counties with a population greater than 100,000 and the municipalities and special districts within those counties. Each of these reporting entities must prepare the Report required by the statute. The following discussion identifies the counties and municipalities involved in the preparation of the Report, as well as sources of information that can be used to identify special districts. Since the Report addresses how services are delivered between jurisdictions, it might be beneficial for the county, municipalities and special districts within the county to work together in the preparation of a single Report for the entire county. A single, cooperatively prepared Report should eliminate duplication during the inventory of interlocal agreements phase of the project. The countywide perspective in a single report would better illuminate the extent of deficits or duplication in the delivery of services. Preparing a single Report would not preclude any participant from expressing differing opinions about the existence of duplications and deficits. Individual points of view could be expressed in the Report. Counties and Municipalities: A map depicting the location of the 33 reporting counties and the regional planning areas in which they are located is included in Attachment B. There are 301 municipalities located within these counties (see Attachment C). The county planning department should assume the lead role in coordinating the municipalities within the county and should contact each special district to inform them of this program. The county should consider hosting a meeting of its municipalities and special districts to coordinated activities under this program. Special Districts: It is recommended that the lead agency assume the task of compiling a list of special districts that should be contacted to ascertain whether or not they have entered into or propose to enter into any interlocal service-delivery agreements regarding any of the eight functional categories listed in the statute. Discussed below are three sources of information that can be used to help compile a list of special districts. Special District Information Program: The Department of Community Affairs maintains a special district database that contains information on over 1,145 active districts. To access the Special District Information Program's on-line database, go to FloridaSpecialDistricts.Or,~, select The Ofltcial List orSpecial Districts On-Line, and then choose Create Your Own Official List of Special Districts. Highlight the appropriate county. The Summary Report option will list all the districts within the selected county and the Detailed Report option will provide more information about each district, including contact information. Use the Download option to create and download a dbf or Excel file that can be used for mailing labels and a master list of providers. The on-line database also includes some information about non-district entities, such as municipal service taxing units and municipal service benefit units (see Non District Report ). The term special district does not include a school district, a community college district, certain special improvement districts (see s.189.403, F.S.). Questions about the Special District Information Program and using the on-line database should be directed to at Jack Gaskins, Jr. at (850) 922-1457. Page 5 of I S Public Facilities Reports: Another source of information about special districts is the public facilities reports that certain independent special districts must prepare and file with each local government in which it is located. See s.189.415, F.S., and s.163.3177(6)(h)3., F.S. These statutes do not specify the specific local government official to whom the report is sent. However, the Florida Special District Handbook recommends that the reports be filed with the local planning official. Locating these reports will help the lead agency compile the list of special districts within the county. 3. Local Government Records: Finally, the county and each municipality should consult their own records to identify those special districts that should be involved in preparing the Report. Utilizing the data sources outlined above (Special District Information Program, public facilities reports, and local government records), the lead agency should prepare a Master List of reporting entities (county, municipalities and special districts) within the county. It might be helpful for the county to post on its web site a table of contacts (the persons in charge of collecting and evaluating the interlocal agreement information), like the following: REPORTING ENTITY NAME OFFICE PHONE EMAIL ' X Coun Contact Plannin Division Y Ci Z S ecial District Copies of the final Reports could be posted on the county web site. The Department of Community Affairs will post on its web site a list of the county contacts. The Report should include a table, labeled Table 1, which identifies each reporting entity. The second column indicates whether the entity is a jurisdiction, or a dependent or independent special district. If a reporting entity is not a party to any of the eight categories of interlocal agreements listed in the statute, the table should so indicate. Table l: Municipalities and Special Districts Located in County Place an "X" in this REPORTING TYPE ABBREVIATION NAME OF column if the jurisdiction ENTITY JURISDICTION/SPECIAL or special district is not a DISTRICT party to a listed a reement cate o X Coun Jurisdictional XC X Coun X Coun De endent XHA X Housin Authori Y Ci Jurisdictional YC Y Ci Multi Independent WCRTA West Coast Regional Trans ortation Authori Page 6 of 15 As an alternative to Table 1, the Department is in the process ofcreating aweb-based system for each reporting entity to record inventory information, similar to Table 1. It is expected that this system will be operational during August 2003. Step 2: Describe Existin>? Service Delivery Arrangements: As an introduction to the subject of service-delivery arrangements, the Report should begin with a brief, factual overview of how the eight listed services are delivered within the area of jurisdiction. The area of jurisdiction should be defined; maps of the area are optional. The overview should discuss the role, such as capital and operational, of the reporting entity in the delivery of these services, as well as the role of private providers within the area of jurisdiction. Include the definition, as used in the Report, of each of the eight services. This section should include the measurement and standards criteria of how the services are provided (see Steps 4 and 5, below). Step 3: Compile the Existins Interlocal A>reements: Each reporting entity should prepare a list of the Interlocal agreements into which it has entered or proposes to enter. For the purpose of the Report, "Interlocal agreement" is may be defined as any agreement with another public or private entity addressing one or more of the eight community services listed in the statute. This would include agreements between counties. At this early inventory stage do not be concerned about whether the agreement is adopted by resolution or ordinance. Inventory all agreements, whether formal or informal, written or verbal. Include memorandums of understanding, consent votes, verbal agreements (this all inclusive inventory will help identify working arrangements that need to be formalized). However, do not include municipal service benefit or taxing units where the local government creates, operates and provides the service and no Interlocal agreement with a separate service provider is used. "Proposed" agreements should be limited to only those that are being actively pursued; not hoped- for dreams. As an alternative to the above procedure where each reporting entity complies a list of agreements, the county could prepare a list of all active Interlocal agreements into which it has entered. The county could distribute the list to all of the reporting entities on the master list (Table 1, above) to solicit information regarding the completeness of the list. The county should also ask for information on agreements entered into by the other reporting entities and to which- the county is not a party. Either process should result in a complete list of existing and proposed Interlocal agreements. Prepare a table, labeled Table 2, summarizing pertinent information about each agreement. For example: Table 2: Existing and Proposed Interlocal Agreements in County Listing Agreement Functional Name of Parties to Effective A "P" in Comments Entity Number Category Agreement Agreement Date this column indicates a proposed a reement Page 7 of I5 In Table 2. the agreements should be grouped into the eight functional categories listed in the ~tan~te and the categories placed in the same order as they appear in the statute. Thus: 1. Education (ED) 2. Sanitary Sewer (SS) 3. Public Safety (PS) 4. Solid Waste (SW) 5. Drainage (DR) 6. Potable Water (PW) 7. Parks and Recreation (PR) 8. Transportation Facilities (TR) To aid in identifying individual agreements, it is recommended that a unique identifying number be assigned to each agreement and that the agreement number be included in the second column of Table 2. To identify each agreement, use a coding system that uniquely identifies the category and each specific agreement within the category. For example, ED-O1 would be the first Education agreement, ED-02 the second Education agreement, and DR-04 would be the fourth Drainage agreement. The agreement numbers are also used in Tables 3, 4 and 5, discussed below. For the purposes of the Report, the eight community services are defined as follows: 1. Education: public schools K-12, adult education, vocational training, but not including charter schools or private educational activities. 2. Sanitary Sewer: all public or private systems subject to an adopted level of service standard and concurrency (see s.163.3180(1), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(a), F.A.C.). 3. Public Safety: fire, police, EMS. 4. Solid Waste: all public or private systems that collection or disposa. :tousehold, commercial, industrial, hazardous, construction and demolition solid waste and subject to an adopted level of service standard (see s.163.3180(1), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(a), F.A.C.). 5. Drainage: natural or man-made systems subject to an adopted level of service standard (see Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(a), F.A.C.). 6. Potable Water: all public or private systems subject to an adopted level of service standard (see Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(a), F.A.C.). 7. Park and Recreation: public systems that are subject to an adopted level of service standard (see s.163.3180((), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(a), F.A.C.). 8. Transportation: public or private systems subject to an adopted level of service standard (see x.163.3180(1), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(a), F.A.C.). Step 4: Identify Duplication of Services: The Commission noted that because of the number and indefinite duration of the some agreements, duplication of services may have developed over time. However, the interlocal agreements identified in Table 2 are not the sole source of information about whether there exists a community service or facility that duplicates a service or facility located within a reporting entity's geographic jurisdiction. Therefore, it is recommended that, based on the geographic and service delivery information assembled in the preparation of the Master List (Table 2), each reporting entity should prepare an analysis of whether there is a duplication, whether capital or operational, of service within their area of jurisdiction. Page 8 of 15 duplication would exist where more than one service-provider provides the same service or facility to the same customer (this would not include any agreements to provide secondary or backup support, such a police or fire protection). For the purposes of the Report, it is not considered a duplication if, for example, a city and a county both provide potable water within separate, but not spatially overlapping, portions of each others jurisdiction. Likewise, it is not duplication when a county sheriff and a municipal police department cross deputize. Duplication of service only occurs when two entities provide the same service within the same (over lapping) geographic area. Such duplication may relate to either (or both) the capital costs of providing the service or to the operational costs of maintaining the service. If the geographic boundaries of a service cannot be determined from the agreements, then there is a potential for overlap and, thus, a potential for duplication of service delivery to exist. The Report should discuss whether an identified duplication should be eliminated and, if so, what possible options might be available to accomplish this. The Report need not include detailed strategies for addressing duplications, but should discuss general approaches that can be used. Prepare a table, labeled Table 3, summarizing the results of this analysis. Table 3: Identified Duplication of Services and Facilities Listing Entity Agreement Number Type of Service or Facility Type of Duplication Ca ital or O erational Brief Description of the Du lication SC ED-Ol Education Stea 5: Identify Service-Delivery Deficits: Counties, cities and special districts are all local governmental arrangements that may be responsible for providing one or more of the eight services listed in the statute. They may have interlocal agreements with each other or with other entities regarding the provision of services. However, there may be gaps in either the type of service provided or the geographic coverage of such services. One type of deficit occurs when one of the listed community services is not provided in portion of the geographic area of the jurisdiction. The agreements can be reviewed to identify any such geographic gaps. The Report should indicate whether or not providing service in the area of non- coverage is appropriate or not. For example, it may not be appropriate to include a silviculture area within a sanitary sewer service area. The Report should focus on identify areas where service is appropriate, but not now provided. In Table 4 (see below) refer to these as Type 1 Deficits. Another type of deficit occurs when one of the listed community services is provided at a level below the adopted or generally recognized level of service standard for that type of service. For example, emergency medical services are provided throughout the state. However, in some locations response times may be much longer than "desirable". "Desirable" could be measured against (1) a level of service standard adopted in the local comprehensive plan, (2) some national recognized standard for the type of service being provided or (3) defined by the interlocal agreement, that is if the service provider is not delivering the service at the agreed upon level, then a deficit exists. The Report should clearly identify the standard used to measure a deficit. In Table 4 refer to these as Type 2 Deficits. Page 9 of 15 Based on the geographic and service delivery information assembled in the preparation of the Master List, each reporting entity should prepare an analysis of whether there is a deficit of service within their service area. The Report should identify the standard used to measure a deficit. The Report should discuss whether the identified deficits should be eliminated and, if so, what possible options might be available. The Report need not include detailed strategies for addressing deficits, but should discuss general approaches that can be used. If there is no interlocal agreement addressing one of the listed community services, simply note this fact in the Report. The absence of an agreement should not be interpretation as automatically creating a deficit, although the Report may conclude that an interlocal agreement is a viable strategy to correct an identified deficit. A table, labeled Table 4, summarizing this analysis should be included in the Report. Table 4: Identified Deficits of Services and Facilities Listing Enti Agreement Number Type of Service or Facili Description of Deficit Brief Description of the Deftcit SC ED-O1 Education Step 6: Identify Needed Updates: During review of the interlocal agreements, note whether the agreement needs updating or revoking. For example, the name or address of one of the parties may have changed. The subject matter of the agreement may no longer be relevant because of changing circumstances, such as annexations or newly incorporated municipalities. Include in the Report any needed actions and suggested steps for accomplishment. A table, labeled Table 5, summarizing the results of step 5 should be included in the Report. Table 5: Needed Updates Listing Entity Agreement Number Type of Needed Action Comments SC ED-01 5. Action by DCA Upon Receipt of Report: When the Report is complete, please send it to: Walker Banning Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Please do not send copies of the interlocal agreements that have been collected. There is no requirement or recommendation regarding any specific local person that should sign the cover letter accompanying the submittal. Page 10 of I S ~~'ithin six (6) months after receiving the reports, the Department, in partnership with each revional planning council, will schedule a meeting of all local `overnments and special districts within the regional planning area. Other participants may also be invited. At the Department's option, county- by-county meetings may be scheduled. Since all the Reports are due on January 1, 2004 it is anticipated that the regional (or county) workshops will be completed by July 1, 2004. The Department will review the Reports in preparation for the meetings and compile a list of potential strategies to remedy any identified deficiencies or duplication. The possible option and general approaches discussed in the Reports (see Steps 3 and 4, above) will be summarized. At the meetings the Reports and potential strategies will be discussed to help counties and municipalities formulate their Intergovernmental Coordination Element amendment. 6. Amendment of Intergovernmental Coordination Element: Counties and municipalities should update their Intergovernmental Coordination Element to implement the results of the Report. The amendment should identify the strategies that will be used to remedy any identified deficiencies or duplications. The inventory of agreements included in the Report can be used to update the inventory information regarding independent special districts already included in the element (see Rule 9J-5.015(1), F.A.C.). The analyses of the interlocal agreements included in the Report can be used to update the intergovernmental coordination analysis already included in the element (see Rule 9J-5.015(2), F.A.C.). The strategies identified to overcome any identified deficiencies or duplications should be implemented through the adoption of relevant objectives and policies (see Rule 9J-5.015(3), F.A.C.). - 7. Process Summary 1. Establish a collaborative rocess to com lete the Re ort. 2. Identi the lead a enc . 3. Pre are a Master List of s ecial districts. 4. Identify those districts with existing or proposed interlocal service-delivery a reements. 5. Describe the existin service-delive rocess. 6. Review each interlocal a reement on the Master List to identi its u ose s . 7. Eliminate those a eements that do not relate to the ei ht statuto cate ories. 8. Anal ze a reements to identi du lication and deficits. 9. Submit re ort to DCA. 10. Partici ate in re Tonal worksho . 11. Amend Inter overnmental Coordination Element 8. Samale Interlocal Agreement Resort Work Program Prepare Master List of County Service Providers- by end of July • Identify contact information • Identify types of service provided (of the 8 categories) • Identify Service Area Maps (if available) • Enter into database and print Provider Summary Reports Page 1 l of 15 Enter into database participating County Department contacts - by end ofJuly • Send Items 3 cYc 4 letters by end of July 3. Send Departments request for participation (or hold meeting) -end of August • Solicit County-only Interlocal Agreements list • Solicit additions/deletions/revisions to Provider Summary Report 4. Send Master List Providers notification of participation - by end of August • Solicit Non-County Interlocal Agreements list • Solicit additions/deletions/revisions to Provider Summary Report • Solicit latest service area boundaries and maps 5. Gather Departmental & Provider responses and enter into database -during August • Prepare complete Interlocal Agreements Report • Send Item 6 letter by end of September. 6. Send Interlocal Agreements Report to Service Providers - by end of September • Solicit additions/deletions/revisions Interlocal Agreements Report • Solicit Assessment of Duplication/Deficit Reports -one assessment per provider per category of service provided -must be provided electronically. • Above may include recommendations 7. Gather Provider edits & Assessments and enter into database -during October 8. Prepare complete document of reports, including -during October • Master List • Service Provider Summary Reports • Maps of Service Areas/Boundaries • Interlocal Agreements Report, by service category • Assessments of Duplication/Deficits Reports (one per provider per service category) 9. Add complete document to web -during November • Solicit final comments from Service Providers and Departments 10. Provide complete document to DCA with - by end of December • NO overall judgments or assessments prepared by County staff other than those contained within the Assessment Reports -County must be impartial. • Disclaimer of Service Providers that chose not to participate. Page 12 of i 5 ATTACH~'IE~T A INTERLOCAL SERVICE-DELIVERY AGREEMENT REPORT REQUIREMENT 163.3177(6)(h) "6. By January 1, 2004, any county having a population greater than 100,000, and the municipalities and special districts within that county, shall submit a report to the Department of Community Affairs which: a. Identifies all existing or proposed interlocal service-delivery agreements regarding the following: education; sanitary sewer; public safety; solid waste; drainage; potable water; parks and recreation; and transportation facilities. b. Identifies any deficits or duplication in the provision of services within its jurisdiction, whether capital or operational. Upon request, the Department of Community Affairs shall provide technical assistance to the local governments in identifying deficits or duplication. 7. Within 6 months after submission of the report, the Department of Community Affairs shall, through the appropriate regional planning council, coordinate a meeting of all local governments within the regional planning area to discuss the reports and potential strategies to remedy any identified deficiencies or duplications. 8. Each local government shall update its intergovernmental coordination element based upon the findings in the report submitted pursuant to subparagraph 6. The report may be used as supporting data and analysis for the intergovernmental coordination element." Page l3 of I S ATTACHMENT B s~~ G~~t~~J~ns M°rbn: Vtlw Interlocal Service-Delivery awa ~k s~~.. Agreement Reporting Counties ~"°~ '~°'~'°~ P°°Cu Pdk~ °'.Qic Population > 100,000 ~ bD °" -,f Regional Planning Councils '''=` ~- . Interlocal Agreement Reporting Counties ~-~~"`;^`~p,„~. County Boundary , `x~ ,._.__. a_ erow°rt oar Page (4 of IS ATTACH~IE~IT C COUNTY, MUNICIPAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT REPORTING PARTNERS REGIONAL COUNTIES NUMBER OF NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER PLANNING AREA MUNICIPALITIES SPECIAL OF PARTNERS DISTRICTS West Florida gay 8 14 23 Escambia 2 16 19 Okaloosa 9 26 36 Santa Rosa 3 17 21 Totals 4 22 73 gg Apalachee Leon 1 15 17 Totals 1 1 15 17 North Central Alachua 9 15 25 Totals 1 9 15 25 Northeast Clay 4 11 15 Duval 5 15 21 St. Johns 3 21 25 Totals 3 12 47 62 Withlacoochee Citrus 2 12 15 Hernando 2 16 19 Marion 5 20 26 • Totals 3 9 48 60 East Central Brevard 15 47 63 Lake 14 23 38 Orange 14 44 59 Osceola 2 31 34 Seminole 7 18 26 Volusia 16 30 47 Totals 6 68 193 267 Tampa Bay Hillsborough 3 g2 gg Manatee 5 41 47 Pasco 6 32 39 Pinellas 24 40 65 Totals 4 38 205 247 Central Florida Polk _ 17 37 55 Totals 1 17 37 55 Southwest Florida Charlotte 1 22 24 Collier 3 34 38 Lee 4 63 68 Sarasota 4 27 32 Totals 4 12 146 162 Treasure Coast Indian River 5 15 21 Martin 4 14 19 Palm Beach 38 73 112 St. Lucie 3 30 34 Totals 4 50 132 186 South Florida Broward 31 82 114 Miami-Dade 32 51 84 2 63 133 198 Grand 33 301 1,044 1,378 Totals Data as of June 30, 2003 Page 15 of l5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 COMMISSIONERS KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL-CHAIRMAN SUSAN LATVALA -VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS JOHN MORRONI ROBERT 8. STEWART BARBARA SHEEN TODD KENNETH T. WELCH July 23, 2003 Cyndi Tarapini, Director of Planning• CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~~~~, P.O. BOX 4748 ~~ , CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 ~ ~.Q~~ ~~~ Dear Ms. Tarapini: ~ p~pNNtNG DEp~RTMENT • CtT`l OF CLEARWATER' Last year, the. Legislature approved several changes to Chapter 163, F.S., related to the State's growth management and comprehensive planning requirements. Included in these .changes was a significant new requirement related to intergovernmental coordination -and service ,delivery. Specifically, the County, the municipalities and special districts are required to undertake a coordinated ,countywide effort to identify deficiencies or duplication in the provision, or delivery, of services. First though, we are required to collectively inventory all existing and proposed interlocal service delivery-related agreements that relate to the following subject areas: Education Sanitary Sewer _ _ ~, * ~ Public~Safety , Solid Waste Drainage Potable Water • * Parks and Recreation * Transportation . The intent. of the legislation is to work towards elimination of redundancy in service delivery and to remedy service delivery issues. The Legislature intended that the county and cities work together to complete this task and that one comprehensive report be .prepared and submitted to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) by January 1, 2004. Within six months of that .date, DCA intends to. come down and convene a regional meeting to discuss the Report and potential strategies to remedy identified issues. After. that, we are each required to amend the, Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of our comprehensive plans to address the results of the process.. - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 315 Court Street ` LOCATION: 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750, Clearwater, Florida-33755 - Clearwater, FL 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 464-8200 FAX: (727) 464-8201 "Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" •Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace ~~ printed on recycled paper Page 2 ' - Ms. Cyndi Tarapini, Director " IDCA recently released their guidelines (see attached) .for the preparation and; submittal of the required~Report, , which 'you may have received already in the mail. , Prior to receiving DCA's guidelines, the ,County had contacted DCA-about the possibility .of "piggybacking" ori. the Pinellas Assembly process as a mechanism for• . accomplishing~the statutory requireinerits related to identification of service delivery issues/deficiencies. While they suggested we .wait until the guidelines were published to see how our ,proposal would fit in, they .were. ' receptive to the' need to devise an efficient process for a county with. so' many local governments, service delivery agreements, and special districts.. ~ - " For efficiency "we .thought- that, rather than setting: up a duplicative• process to `the Pinellas Assembly Workgroups (who-are addressing at least three of the *same subject areas, with results,expected in November of this year), we would plan to •include the results of the Assembly process; where tli~y relate specifically to service delivery issues, in~the required report to DCA... ` " ~ , We have already begun to inventory existing service delivery agreements and, will mail a draft list out- to you shortly for review: What we would like to do at 'this time:. is establish a contact in your office that we can coordinate with over -the coming months on this intergovernmental coordination/service delivery project. .In . .compiling data and disseminating it for `review; we actually plan to coordinate/share"information as much~as , possible via email and possibly the:internet, although some meetings may still be necessary. A general timeline for. the ".process . is attached' to this letter for reference: As• certain Special' Districts are affected by the requirements, we are contacting those who provide any of the services addressed' by-the requirements and-will plan to include them in the coordination process.: ' Please contact me at 464-8200 with any questions, and importantly, please let us know the name of the person we.should.'work with in your organization.on this joint project (you can, contact me or my staff. -,, I have. included the-email, addresses. for my staff who will be involved in this project). The draft list of compiled ' agreements will be sent out shortly to your contact person for review. - . Thanks for yourhelp, and we look forward to.working with you and your staff iri this process.! - .. .° Sincerely, ,- Brian .Smith, Director ~P~el as County Planning Department Enclosure ~. cc: Stephen Spratt,"Pinellas County Administrator Jake Stowers, Assistant County Administrator ~ ~ ' . City Managers - F:\USERS\CEI~IDOCS\BCC\Service Delv L'tr City of Clearwater 72303.gg.doc PROPOSED TIMELINE AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING A COUNTYWIDE INTERLOCAL SERVICE DELIVERY AGREEMENT REPORT / Identify municipal and special district contacts -July 2003 / Mail-out draft inventory of service delivery agreements prepared by county staff to municipal and special district contacts for review -July 2003 / Based on review and comment by municipal and special district contacts, county staff to complete inventory of county, municipal and special district service delivery agreements (includes agreements between county and any service provider as well as between municipality and any service provider) -August 2003 / Provide final draft of inventory to contacts for final review. Provide draft (text) overview of existing coordination mechanisms to municipal and special district contacts - August/September 2003 / Revise text based on input from municipal and special district contacts - August/September 1003 / County, municipal and special, district contacts evaluate inventory and text to see if there are any areas of overlap or duplication of services, or any service delivery gaps or deficiencies, etc.) - AugustiSeptember 2003 / County staff collects and compiles input from contacts on any areas of overlap or deficiencies; compiled summary sent back to contacts for review - September/October 2003 / Monitor Pinellas Assembly Workgroups re: identifying/evaluating service delivery issues/deficiencies -July through November 2003 / Review and summarize relevant findings and recommendations from Assembly process (i.e., "package" the minutes, results, etc.) -November 2003 / County staff to organize inventory, text, Assembly results and any identified service delivery issues/deficiencies into a collective Report; sent back to contacts for final review and sign off - November/December 2003 / Submit summary of agreements/text summary and compilation of issues in a Report to DCA -December 2003 The hope would be to coordinate as much as possible through email, phone, mail and Internet BUT at least one meeting may be necessary after the agreements are compiled, and existing coordination mechanisms are summarized Email addresses: Brian Smith: bsmith@co.pinellas.fl.us Gordon Beardslee: gbeardsl@co.pinellas.fl.us Elizabeth Freeman: efreeman@co.pinellasfl.us Samantha Shorr-Zigante: szigante@co.pinellasfl.us ,{ , ,' • - ~ T INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT i - _.. THIS INTERLOCAI. AGREEMENT is made and entered into this J'~~ day of ~.~ 1991„ by and between PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, a olio F cal subdivxsxon of the State of Florida (herein, the 'County") and CITX OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a Florida municipality (herein, the "City"). WHEREAS, both the County and the City exercise cpmprehensive - planning authority pursuant to the Local Government ~Cornpreh@nsive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, as set forth in Part II of Chapter 1b3, Florida Statutes (herein, the "Planning Act"), and enforce land development regulations to regulate the development of land within the respective areas of jurisidiction of each party; and WHEREAS, numerous parcels of unincorporated land subject to the planning jurisdiction of the County are enclaves or are otherwise within adjacent areas of possible future voluntary annexation by the City, but lie outside of the planning jurisdiction of the City; and WHEREAS, the orderly planning for future development of both the County and the City requires that the procedures set forth herein be followed, so that property owners may be fully informed of the requirements of both agencies; and WHEREAS, Section 1b3.3171 {3), Florida Statutes, specifically permits agreements between counties and cities to provide for the joint exercise authority under the Planning Act with respect to unincorporated areas adjacent to municipalities; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3171(3}, Florida Statutes, specifically requires a public hearing with due public notice as defined in Section 1b3.3164(17}, Florida Statutes, both the City and County having held public hearings pursuant to those requirements; and ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ 0 s. . ~ WHEREAS, the ~ County has distributed copi~ of the Interlocal Agreement to all municipalities adjacent Co the Clearwater Planning Area created under this Agreement for their review and comment; NOW, TNEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants made by each party to the other and of the mutual advantages to be realized by the parties hereto, the County and the City agree as follows: Section 1. Authority. This Interlocal Agreement is entered into pursuant to the general authority of Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, relating to interlocal agreements, and the specific authority of Section 163.3171(3), Florida Statutes. Section 2. Term. The initial term of this Interlocal Agreement shall be the date hereof through September 30, 1992. Thereafter, unless sooner terminated, the term shall be automatically extended for successive one year terms beginning on October 1 and ending an September 30 of the following year, with the last such automatic extension ending on September 30, 2000. Section 3. Clearwater Planning Area Created. The area within Pinellas County which is described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B hereto, consisting generally of certain lands lying outside the corporate limits of this City is hereby designated as the Clearwater Planning Area. Section 4. Planning Authority for Clearwater Planning Area; T~...J~~~.. (a) The County shall have full authority for the preparation and adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and any amendments thereto pursuant to the Planning Act, and for the adoption, amendment and enforcement of land development regulations thereunder, for all parcels of property within the Clearwater Planning Area lying outside the corporate limits of the City unless and until such parcel is annexed by Che City. - 2 - . r . (1~ The City, in preparing ~ and adopting its . , comprehensive plan for the development of land within the City, and any amendments thereto, may include the Clearwater Planning Area within the City's plan in order to advise both the County and the owners of parcels of property therein of the long-range planning objectives of the City. However. the City acknowledges that the inclusion in the City's plan of parcels of property within the Clearwater Planning Area which lie oatside the corporate limits of the City shall not be binding on the County or the property owners prior to such annexation of such parcels by the City. (c) Any affected person within the Clearwater Planning Area shall have standing to participate in any administrative, legislative, quasi-judicial or judicial proceeding in which the adoption or effect of the City's comprehensive plan or any amendment thereto upon the affected person's property is an issue, and may. challenge the adoption of the plan or any amendment thereto, to the same extent that the affected person would have standing if the property were included within the boundaries of the City. For the purpose of this sub-paragraph, "affected Berson" includes the owner of the property and any person residing upon it or owning or operating a business thereon, and shall be synonymous with the "affected person" as defined by Section 163.3184{1){a), Florida Statutes (1987), as the same may be amended from time to time. (d) In the event that an owner of property within the Clearwater Planning Area applies to the City for voluntary annexation of the property, the owner may assent to the City's comprehensive plan as it applies to the property if the City's comprehensive plan provides for intensity of use or density which is equal to or less than the County's - 3 - ~ . .- - comprehensive plan as determined by the Pinellas ~ounty Local Planning Agency, in which case the City's comprehensive plan shall take effect as to the property at the .time of annexation and any subsequent public hearing and final plan amendment action for the .property that may be required, including but not limited to any required amendments to the Countywide Future Land (1se Plan. (e} If the contingencies of sub-section (d) of this Section 4 are not met, with regard to the owners assent or the determination by the local planning agency, a land-use designation will be established for the newly annexed property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes and Chapter 73-544, Laws of Florida, as amended, (f) Property in the Clearwater Planning Area shall become subject to the planning authority of the City upon the effective date of annexation by the City as provided by Section 171.062, Florida Statutes (1987), or successor provisions thereto. Section 5. Notice. Notice by either party to the other pursuant to this Interlocal Agreement shall be given in writing and hand-delivered or mailed as follows: if to the County: County Administrator Pinellas County Courthouse 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 34616 if to the City: ~ City Manager P.O. $ox 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 Section 6. Construction. This Interlocal Agreement shall be construed as an expression of inter-agency cooperation enabling each party to make the most efficient use of its powers in furtherance of the - 4 - ' objectives of the Panning Act. However, this Inte~ocal Agreement shall ' not be construed as delegating or authorizing the delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of either party to the other. Section 7. Termination. Either party may terminate this Interlocal Agreement upon 30 days notice to the other. Section 8. Filing• effective date. As required by Section 1b3.01(11), Florida Statutes, this Interlocal Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, after execution by the parties, and shall take effect upon the date of filing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals as of the date set forth above. Attest: KARLEEN F. DeBLAKER, CLERK PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA by and through its Board of County Commissioners eputy Clerk By: Chairm Approved as to form: By: '~- ames L. Bennett Assistant County Attorney Countersigned: ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: BY' Rita Garvey Michael Wright . Mayor-Commissioner City Manager Approved as to form and Attest: - - legal sufficen -~ By : BY ~ ~ .~ , .~. M.A. Gal raith, Cy hia E. Gct~deau . City Attorney Ci Clerk _ ~ . '~ PLNBCCid21-25-29/tsw ,5- . *.. - .. - CLEARWATER PLANNING AREA r SEPTEMBER 1, 1991 ,~--' SERVARFA.WIS EX~~IBIT A 1 Begin at the intersection of the law tide line of the Gulf of Mexico and the North City limit line of the Town of Belleair Beach and run Easterly along said North line of the Town of Belleair Beach to the center of the Intracoastal Waterway in Clearwater Harbor; 2 thence run Northeasterly along said centerline to its intersection with a line that is 396 feet South of and parallel to the Northerly line of Section 21, Township 29 South,~ Range 15 East, (said line also being the North limits of the Town of Belleair, Florida); 3 thence run East along said line to the Northwest corner of Druid Place Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 26, Page 122 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; 4 thence run S 89°05'01" E, 196.53 feet; 5 thence run N 00°04'03" E, 33.-00 feet; 6 thence run S 89°05'01" E, 173.90 feet to the Northeast corner of said Druid Place Subdivision; 7 thence run South along the midsection line of said Section 21, 634 feet to the centerline of Watkins Road; 8 thence run East to a point 30 feet West of the East boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 21; 9 thence run South 363 feet parallel to said East Boundary line; 10 thence run West to a point 455 feet West of the East boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 21, said paint being the center of Corbett Street and Fourth Avenue; 11 thence run South 305~feet to the center of "B" Street; 12 thence run East along the center of "B" Street, 316.00 feet to the center ~of an alley; 13 thence run South along center of alley, 620.00 feet to the center of "D" Street; 14 thence run East 109.00 feet to the West line of Fort Harrison Avenue; 15 thence run South along the West line of Fort Harrison Avenue to the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 21; ~ V 16 thence run East along said North boundary to the Northeast corner of the said Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 21; 17 thence run South 1/4 of a mile along the East boundary of said Southwest 1/4 .of Southeast 1/4 of said Section 21 to the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 Section 21, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; 18 thence run East along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 21 and continue East along the South line of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East to the East right--of-way line of Miller Avenue extended, as shown on the Plat entitled Lauretta Terrace, as recorded in Plat Book 19, Page 17; .• .• 19 ~ thence South along said extension and Miller Avenue East {`' right-of-way 180 feet to the South line of Lot 6 of said Lauretta Terrace; I 20 thence East along said South line of Lot 6, 55 feet; 21 thence Northerly 50 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 4 of said Plat; 22 thence East along the South line of Lot 4 to the West line of the West 1/3 of the East 3/5 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; 23 thence South to the Southwest corner of the aforesaid West 1/3 of the East 3/5 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 27; 24 thence East along the South line of aforesaid Tract to the _ Southeast corner of said West 1/3 of the East 3/5; 25 thence North along the East line of said West 1/3 of the East 3/5 to the Southwest corner of Lot 14, Block 1, as shown of the Plat entitled Greenwood Lawn, as recorded in Plat Book 16, page 73, of said Public Records; 26 thence East along the South line of said Lot 14 to the Southeast corner of said lot 14; 27 thence North along the East line of Lots 14 and 13, Block 1 of said Greenwood Lawn, to the Northeast corner of Lot 13; 28 thence East to the East right-of-way line of Ewing Avenue, also being the Southwest corner of Lot 28; Block 2 of said Greenwood Lawn Subdivision; _ i .•^ 29 ~ thence North along the West line of Lots 28 and 27, Block 2, ~`~ to the Southwest corner of Lot 26, Block 2, 30 thence West to the Southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 1 of said Greenwood Lawn Subdivision; 31 thence North to the Northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1 of said Subdivision; 32 thence East to the Northwest corner of Lot 25, ,B lock 2, said Subdivision; 33 thence North to the Southwest corner of Lot ].9, Block 2 of said Subdivision; _ 34 thence West to the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1 of • said Subdivision; 35 thence North along the West line of Lots 3 and 1, Block ]. said Subdivision and said line extended North to the North line of Section 27, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; 36 thence along said North line of Section to the .Northerly extension of the West Line of Lvt 14 of Loveland Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 28, Page 20 of said Public Records; 37 thence South along said extension and the West line of said Lot 14 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 14; 38 thence Westerly along the South lines of Lots 5 through 13 to the Southeast corner of Lot 4 of said Loveland Subdivision; 39 thence Northerly to the Northeast corner of said Lot 4; 40 thence Westerly along the North lines of Lots 4 and 3 to the Northwest corner of Lot 3 said Subdivision; + 41 thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 3 and its `M, southerly extension; (also being the East right-of-way line of Greenwood Avenue) 5 00°55'08" W, 656.53 feet; 42 thence S 89°32'46" E, 198.01 feet; 43 thence N 00°57'07" E, 275.74 feet; 44 thence S 89°16'39" E 581.95 feet; 45 thence S 00°57'07" W 273.05 feet; ~ 46 thence S 89°32'46" E 571.58 feet to the East right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue; 47 thence Northerly along said East right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue to the North line of said Section 27; 48 thence Easterly along the North line of said Section 27 to the Northerly extension of the West right-of-way line of Hillcrest Avenue as shown on plat of Replat of Monterey J Heights, 1st Addition, Recorded in Plat Book 43, page 28 of said Public Records; 49 thence Southerly along said extension of the West right-of- way line of Hillcrest Avenue and the West right-of-way line of Hillcrest Avenue as shown on the Plat of Monterey Heights 1st Addition as recorded in Plat Book 33, pages 43 and 44 of said Public Records to the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 27; 50 thence Easterly along said South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 and continue Easterly along the South line of South 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest ?/4 of Section 26 and its Easterly extension to the East right- of-way line of Highland Avenue; 51 ~ thence Northerly along the said East right-of-way line of l ~`" Highland Avenue to its intersection with the Easterly extension of the North line of the South 1/4 of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 26; 52 thence Westerly along said extension and the North line of the South 1/4 of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the East right-of-way line of said Hillcrest Avenue; 53 thence Northerly along said Hillcrest Avenue to the Southwest Corner of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; 54 thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 23 to a point described as the East line of the West 4 acres of the East 1'/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest Z/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 23; 55 thence South to the South right-of-way line of Belleair Road as shown on the Plat of Clearview Heights as recorded in Plat Book 46, page 34 of said Public Records; 56 thence Easterly along said South right-of-way line of Belleair Road to the Northwest corner of Lot 43 of said Clearview Heights Subdivision; 57 thence Southerly along the Westerly lines of said Lot 43 to its Southwesterly Corner; 58 thence Southeasterly along the most Southerly lines of Lots 43 and 44 to the Southwesterly corner of Lot 45; 59 thence Easterly along the South line of Lot 45 to the Northwest corner of Lot 46 of said Subdivision; 6d thence Southerly to the Southwest corner of Lot 46; 61 ~ thence Easterly along the South line of said Lot 46 and its ~ . .`" Easterly extension to the East Right-of-way line of Highland Avenue; 62 thence Northerly along said East right-of-way line to the South line of~said Section 23; 63 thence Easterly along said South line of Section 23 to the Southerly extension of the West line of Belleair Park Estates as recorded in Plat Book 63, Page 39 of said Public Records; 64 thence Northerly along said extension and the West line of said Belleair Park Estates and its Northerly extension to the North right-of-way line of Nursery Road; 65 thence Eastward along said North right-of-way line of Nursery Road to its intersection with the Southerly y extension of the East line of Lot 7, Highland Manor 2nd Addition as recorded in Plat Book 63, page 51 of said Public Records; 66 thence Northerly along said extension and the East line of said Lot 7 to its intersection with the South line of Lot 15, Highland Manor 1st Addition as recorded in Plat Book 55, Page 52 of said Public Records; 67 thence Easterly along the South lines of Lots 15 and 16 to a point 6 feet east of the Southwest corner of Lot 16; 68 thence Northerly along a line 6 feet East of and Parallel to the West line of Lot 16 and its Northerly extension to the centerline of Seabreeze Street; 69 ~ thence Eastward along the centerline of Seabreeze Street to the Centerline of Lake Avenue; 70 thence Southerly along the centerline of Lake Avenue to the Centerline of Belleair Road; 71 Thence Easterly along the centerline of Belleair Road to the West Right-o,f-way line of U.S. Highway 19; 72 thence Southerly along the West right-af-way line of U.S. Highway 19 to the Centerline of Allens Creek; 73 thence Easterly along the centerline of Allens Creek to the Westerly boundary of Tampa Bay; 74 thence East to the line in Old Tampa Bay dividing the counties. of Hillsborough and Pinellas; 75 thence Northerly along said line dividing said counties to a point East.of the Westerly extension of the South line of Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 29 South, Range 16 East; 76 thence Westerly along said extension and the South line of Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10 and continue Westerly along the South line of North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 16 East to the centerline of Alligator Creek; 77 thence Westerly along the centerline of Alligator Creek to the Westerly right-of-way line of McMullen Booth Road; ` - _ 78 ~ thence Northerly along said Westerly right-of-way line of ( McMullen Booth Road to its intersection with the South line of the South 72 feet .of the North 765 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28 South, Range 16 East; 79 thence Westerly along the South line of the South 72 feet of the North 765 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 33, to a point 625 feet East of the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 33; 80 thence Northerly 72 feet along a line 625 feet East of and .parallel to the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to its intersection with the South line of the North 693 feet of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; 81 thence Westerly along said South line of the North 693 feet of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point 330 feet East of the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; 82 thence Northerly along a line 330 feet East of and parallel to the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the South right-of-way line of Enterprise Road East; 83 thence Easterly along said South right-of-way line of Enterprise Road East to the West right-of-way line of McMullen Booth Road; ` - '4 r 84 ~ thence Northerly along said West right-of-way line of ~" McMullen Booth Road~to its intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road 580; 85 thence Easterly along said Northerly right-of-way line of State Road 580 to East line of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 21, Township 28 South, Range 16 East; 86 thence Northerly along the East line of the West 1/2 of said Southeast 1/4 and continue Northerly along the East line of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 21 to the Northeast corner of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 21; 87 thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of V said Section 21 to the Northwest corner of the South 1/2 of the Sautheast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 21; 88 thence Southerly along the West line of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 21 to the North line of the West 1/2 of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 21; 89 thence Westerly along said North line of the west 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 to the Northwest corner of said West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4; 9p thence Southerly along the West line of said west 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 30,00 feet; ~• -. ~ 91 ~ thence Westerly along a line 30 feet Southerly of and ,''"' parallel to the North line of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 21 to a point that is 485.60 feet East of the West line of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 21; 92 thence Southerly along a line 485.60 feet East of and parallel to the West line of the East 1/2 of said Southwest 1/4, 200 feet; 93 thence Westerly along a line 230 feet South of and parallel to the North line of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 21 and its Westerly extension to the Westerly right-of-way line of McMullen Booth Road; 94 thence Northerly along said West right-of-way line of McMullen Booth Road to its intersection with the South line of the South 370 feet of the North 594 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 21, Township 28 South, Range 16 East; 95 thence Westerly along said South line of the South 370 feet of the North 594 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest i/4 of Section 21 to a point lying 778.63 feet East of the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; 96 thence North 00°07'04" East, 352 feet; 97 thence North 89°38'42" West, 14.31 feet; 98 thence North 00°07'04" East, 8 feet; 99 thence North 89°38'42" West, 470.0 feet; • t 100 thence North 00°07'04" East, 10 feet, to the North line of the South 370 feet of the North 594 feet of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 21; 101 thence Easterly along said North line of the South 370 feet of the North 594 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the West right-of-way line of McMullen Booth Road; 102 thence Northerly along said Westerly right-of-way line of McMullen Booth Road to its intersection with the Southerly right-of-way line of Curlew Road (State Road 586); 103 thence Westerly along said Southerly right-of-way line of Curlew Road to its intersection with the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; 104 thence Southerly along said Easterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19 to its intersection with the Southerly right-of-way line State Road 580;. 105 thence Westerly along said Southerly right-of-way line of State Road 580 to a point lying 150 feet East of the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 16 East; 106 thence Southerly along said line, lying 150 feet East of and parallel to the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 30 to a point lying 396 feet South of the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 30; 107 thence Westerly along said line, lying 396 feet South of the North line of said Southwest 1/4 to the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 30; 108 thence Southerly along the West line of the said Southwest ~~ I/4 of Section 30 and the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31, Township 28 South, Range 16 East to the Southwest corner of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 31; 109 thence Westerly along the Northerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 29 South, Range 15 East to the Northwest corner of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 36; 110 thence Southerly along the West line of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 36 to its intersection with the South right-af- way line of Virginia Street in the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 36; 111 thence Westerly along said South right-of-way line of Virginia Street to its intersection with the East right-of- way line of Keene Road; `. 112 thence Southerly along said East right-of-way line of Keene Road to its intersection with the centerline of Union Street; 113 thence Westerly along said centerline of Union Street, also being the North lines of Sections 2, 3 & 4 Township 29 South, Range 15 East tv the Northwest corner of Section 4, said Northwest corner of Section 4 being in the waters of Clearwater Harbor; 114 thence in a Northwesterly direction through the waters of Clearwater Harbor and Dunedin Pass to the intersection of the low tide line of Dunedin Pass and the property deeded to Edwin R. Hunter as recorded in Official Record Book 5665, Pages 309 thru 312; 2 ~• • . '' ` " -. 115 thence Westerly along the Northern boundary of the Hunter 1 .`J Property and continue Westerly along the Northern boundary of the property deeded to the Clearwater Marine Science Center, Inc. as recorded in Official Record Book 5899, pages 1300 thru 1302 to its intersection with the low tide line of the Gulf of Mexico and a Point of Termination. ' 1^' ~' - s/ ~i :: ~ : ~ ~ i • f ;~ ~• • ~ ,: .~ `~ `~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ - ;; ~ .I ~ ,~ ~w.a,.aar.arw.w.\ D ~! . ~~ ( + r ~~~ ,~ ~~ 4 ~r \,~ ;-~ ;~ ~ \ .~ . .. ~ , ,:~ ~~ f~ j '' '1 ~ ~, t'~ ~ I w. a. a. a•^.aw.a~i. r.r a.f1 I ~ ~ I ~! ~ IjI Q Ii ~ 1 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ J , ~r j '~1 _, _`~ .ii I ~ `~~ • ;~f "-.: . /~ ''~ . \ ~y P o =. a j .~ v ~ - :: . J~ /O ~• yi~ar^ r. r. 1 =~ .~, . a.~ ~' ~ ~~ /~ ~ ~. 4 rF ~.' i ~ ~ J '~ ~ c, ii ~J ~ ~ 1l i / i a~uuiR K I a. .w r r • a. ^ - - _ •' . ~ti.~f sP"fr~ CURLEW'`RD o i• __y t ~ 6 ~ ~D L~ai--fin,, ~~~._ r '~' A~ ^- ~~ . a a ~ ~ ~~ .. v , ~ -•'--------.iii 61 l.. h ~~` 1 :ter I'rQ ~ Q I M i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~,.( a~ ~, f ~ 'o a 11 o , ~~ p.-~ • prnr~R ~ ~ ,• • p~l ~ ~ ~ }y" ••----' ~_, ~ h ,~ ~038R7Y KWWR • . ".•• , P ~• t G ' ~ ~~~ • 0 ¢~-µ 00 oa Z ~ iy •i ~I ! .thaw... a•^ .a.au.ua~a.w,-..a~a.r.a. =:,~i •; ~ ~ f .-1t`,'r~' ' `- `.~- ~ ,~ ~,~1/,~ i ~ Of8 7ANPA fl~Y I • • :~ ~ d o Y` ~~ p~ QIULF 70' BAY eLroo;!` - -"-'-°"'---~ h ' .a.a.a,. r.a u.w~ _ _ ~ " °'~ f ~--' ~~ - ~, PLANNING AREA •^• ,.,:;~ -_: i ,..- ~ T ~.~ •~- ~ -o• u _ CLEARWATER H' a / ; --• - ~ ~o ~ J FLORIDA '~ •• . s71wN.wr a's - - - - ~ a t.. January 14, 1992 #31 PUBLIC HEARING HELD RE CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN INTER- LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR CLEARWATER PLANNING AREA• INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - APPROVED FOR EXECUTION Pursuant to legal notice published in the December 31, 1991 and January 9, 1992 issues of the St. Petersburg Times as evidenced by publisher's affidavit filed with the Clerk, public hearing was.held re consideration of the adoption of an Inter- local Agreement with the City of Clearwater for the Clearwater Planning Area. Deputy Clerk G. K. West reported that letters of no objection have been received from the Town of Belleair and the Cities of Dunedin and Largo; and that the matter is properly before the Board to be heard. County Administrator Fred E. Marquis recommended ap- proval of the Interlocal Agreement. No one appeared in response to the Chairman' call for persons wishing to be heard. Commissioner Tyndall moved, seconded by Commissioner Rainey and carried, that the Interlocal Agreement be approved for execution. FYI AND NOTES... WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FIGURE 5, WE DID NOT MAKE ANOTHER SET OF MAPS FOR THIS MAILOVT. (FIGURE 5 HAD AN ERROR SO A CORRECTED MAP IS ENCLOSED). HOWEVER, IF YOU NEED ANOTHER COMPLETE SET, PLEASE LET US KNOW! DCA WILL RECEIVE THE COMPLETE CORRECT SET. WE HAVE ENCLOSED THE ENTIRE PINELLAS ASSEMBLY REPORT FOR YOUR USE; BUT REMEMBER, WE ONLY PLAN TO ATTACH THE SECTIONS DEALING WITH PUBLIC SAFETY, RECREATION AND TRANSPORTATION TO THE FINAL INTERLOCAL SERVICE DELIVERY REPORT THAT IS SUBMITTED TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. ~S ~ .; v . ~ AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ;~ ~ day of ~ee~;rn bar , 2000, by and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "Board. " WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Board desires to use various City-owned facilities for physical education and various other school-related activities; and WHEREAS, the City desires to use various Board-owned school facilities for recreation, public meetings, and other city-related programs; and WHEREAS, the City and Board are each willing to cooperate in this matter under certain conditions and provisions; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the Board and City each give the other license to use their respective facilities as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto as amended yearly, and made part of this agreement, under the following terms and conditions: 1. The term of this Agreement will be for a period of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2001, and ending December 31, 2006. This Agreement may be extended for additional five-year periods under the same terms and conditions set forth herein, with written agreement and approval by the Board and City. 1 z v .., .! 2. Exhibit "A" will be updated by both parties prior to December 31, 2001, and subsequently every year thereafter for the duration of this agreement. 3. The Board agrees to make its facilities available when the use thereof does not interfere with the regularly scheduled school programs as outlined in Exhibit "A. " Use of said facilities will not be earlier than 8:00 a.m. nor later than 11:00 p.m. for outdoor use and not later than 12:00 midnight for in!loor use. Board facilities used by the City as polling places will be opened at 6:00 a.m. The City will determine if the Board facility is suitable and available prior to informing the public that the Board facility will be used as a polling place. 4. The facilities owned by the City may be used by the Board for physical education and other school-related activities, when the use thereof does not interfere with any City programs and conforms with the hours the facilities are normally open to the public. If one party desires to use the other party's facilities at a time other than normally open, the using party will be required to pay the normal rental fee for said usage. 5. Each party agrees to maintain the facilities and surrounding area in a clean and sanitary condition after use by itself or any of its agents or invitees. 6. The City ;and all its invitees will abide by all Board policies when using Board facilities, including those policies which state that the consumption of tobacco products or alcoholic beverages on Board property, including any outside areas, is prohibited. 7. Each party will provide its own personnel for the supervision of the programs it conducts. 2 .~ - 8. Use of the facilities by private parties or organizations or by business enterprises for profit is prohibited. The Board and City further agree to make no unlawful, improper, or offensive use of the facilities and all rights of a party breaching this paragraph will be subject to termination by the other party. 9. This agreement will remain in effect unless terminated by either party as follows: (a) Upon breach of this agreement by a party, the other party will give written notice of termination of this agreement specifying the claimed breach and the action required to cure the breach. If the breaching party fails to cure the breach within five days from receipt of said notice, then the contract will terminate ten days from receipt of the written notice; (b) Either party may terminate this agreement by giving written notice to the other party that the agreement will terminate thirty days from the receipt of said notice by the other party. 10. Subject to the limitations contained in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes (2000) each party agrees that it will save the other harmless on account of the negligent acts of its employees or agents or on account of any unsafe condition that may exist as a result of the negligent operation by its employees or agents of its facilities in accordance with the provisions of Section 768.28 Florida Statutes. Each party agrees to be responsible for the safety of its own invitees, licensees or participants in its programs in case of accidental injury, except as provided above. 3 ~ 4 ~ ~' i ~' '` ' . 11. Neither the Board nor the City may assign this Agreement or any of its rights hereunder, nor permit others to use the facilities or any part thereof without the written consent of the other party. The Board and Ciry agree that each party and its officers, agents, and servants will have the right to enter and inspect the facilities and the activities being conducted thereon at reasonable times. 12. Additional City or School Board facilities may be used at appropriate times and places with the written approval of the Superintendent, City Manager or their respective designees. This Agreement may then be amended to describe the additional facilities and uses. 13. In the event of questions arising out of the use of the facilities or otherwise arising under this Agreement, the questions will be settled in writing between the Superintendent and the City Manager, or the specific designee of either for resolution of such questions. 14. In the event litigation is necessary to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing parry will be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees from the non-prevailing party. (Note: The remainder of the page is intentionally left blank.) a {r ~ ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first written. Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA B g ~~-~ Mayor-Co 'ssion Brian J. Aungst Interim City Manages William B. Horne, II Approved as to form and correctness: Attest: Ity Attorney, John Carassas Approved as to Form and cone ess: S hool Board Attorney Witnesses: - ~ ~. As to School Board Ci Clerk, Cynthia E..Goudeau THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNT LORIDA BY Chairman Date agreemnt\CtyCIw.2000 ,^ ~. `t ~, . INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the Board of County Commissioners of~Pinellas County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County"), the City Commission or City Council of the Cities of Clearwater, Dunedin, Gulfport, Largo, Madeira Beach, Oldsmar, Pinellas Park, Safety Harbor, Seminole, St. Petersburg, St. Pete Beach, and Tarpon Springs, Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "Cities"), and the School Board of Pinellas County, Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "School Board"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Legislature has enacted section 163.31777, Florida Statutes (2002), requiring that each county and the non-exempt municipalities within that county enter into an interlocal agreement with the district school board to establish jointly the specific ways in which the -plans and processes of the district school board and local governments are to be coordinated; and WHEREAS, section 163.31777 (1) (d), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that interlocal agreements between local governments and district school boards adopted pursuant to section 163.3177 before the effective date of section 163.31777, Florida Statutes (2002), must be updated and executed pursuant to the requirements of section 163.31777, if necessary; and WHEREAS, the School Board, the County, and the Cities enter into this agreement in fulfillment of the statutory requirements and in recognition of the benefits accruing to their citizens and students residing in Pinellas County. NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the School Board, the County, and the Cities that the procedures hereinafter set forth will be followed in coordinating land use and public school facilities planning as provided in section 163.31777, .Florida Statutes (2002), 1. Student Enrollment and Population Projections. In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities, and School Board agree to coordinate and base their plans upon consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. The Metropolitan Planning Organization's Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) staff will annually utilize established procedures to develop population growth projections for each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) in the County, which will be provided to the School Board and all local governments. The School Board will use this data along with student enrollment, birth rates, Florida Department of Education projections, and other relevant data to project student enrollment. The preliminary enrollment projections and how they are developed will then be provided to the TCC and all local governments for review and comments. Final enrollment projections will be provided to all local governments. See section 163.31777.(2) (a). ~~ 7 f, 2. Coordinating and Sharing of Information. (a) The School Board will notify all local governments of proposed school facility changes, such as new construction, remodeling, renovations, closures or change in type of school that may have an impact on a particular local government. This notification will be provided by furnishing a copy of the school district's annual update of the district facilities five-year work program with a written summary describing the proposed changes in each jurisdiction. The notification will be provided to the person designated by each local government. The School Board will also provide to each local government a copy of the district's five-year school plant survey and any annual updates with sufficient time for local government review and comment. (b) Each local government will inform the School Board in advance of approval of plans for residential development and redevelopment, land use plan or zoning changes that change residential densities, and major infrastructure projects that may impact public schools with sufficient time for School Board review and comment. Such notification, where appropriate, should include the proposed site plan that indicates the location, size, the number and types of units (number of bedrooms), price range of the units, any deed restrictions that may impact student population, and other information as may be appropriate. See section 163.31777 (2) (b). 3. School Site Selection, Significant Renovations, and Potential School Closures. Participation by each affected local government with the School Board in the process of evaluating potential school closures, significant renovations to existing schools, and school site selection before land acquisition shall be in accordance with existing interlocal agreements concerning school site selection. The parties to each interlocal agreement will review the agreement and amend as necessary to handle proposed school closures and significant renovations to existing schools. See section 163.31777 (2) (c). 4. Supporting Infrastructure. In addition to the notification required in paragraph 2(a) above, the School Board will notify each local government of the need for on-site or off- site improvements to support new, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools within the jurisdiction of that local government. Thereafter, representatives of the School Board and the affected local government will meet and determine the responsibility for making such improvements and identify other agencies that should be involved. The parties will then meet with the other agencies to coordinate the completion of the on-site and off-site improvements. See section 163.31777 (2) (d). 5. School Capacity. The School Board will determine the capacities of al{ school facilities in accordance with the rules adopted by the School Board in the applicable student assignment plan and annually notify each local government of the capacities of the schools within its jurisdiction. The annual notification will indicate how many spaces are allocated to permanent capacity and how many are allocated to relocatable classrooms. See section 163.31777 (2) (e). f _~t 6. School District Five-Year School Plant Survey and District Facilities Five-Year Work Program. The School Board will notify each local government of the initiation of the district's five-year school plant survey and of the initiation of the annual update of the district facilities five-year work program and request comments and recommendations for consideration ~in the development of the survey and work program. Each local government will provide comments and recommendations to assist in developing the final recommendations to be submitted to the School Board for approval. Each local government will be provided with a copy of the recommendations concerning the survey and work program at the time they are provided to the School Board. Each local government will be notified of the date and time of the meeting at which the School Board will take action to approve the survey and work plan. Copies of the approved school plant survey and district facilities five-year work program will be provided to each local government. See section 163.31777 (2) (f). 7. Collocation and Shared Use of Facilities. The collocation and shared use of facilities are important to the School Board and local governments. The School Board and each local government will look for opportunities to collocate or share the use of each entity's facilities. Opportunities for collocation and shared use will be considered for libraries, parks, recreational facilities, community centers, auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performing arts centers, stadiums, healthcare and social services, schools, and other uses as may be determined appropriate. An agreement will be developed for each instance of collocation and shared use to address legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from collocation or shared use. See section 163.31777 (2) (g). 8. Conflict Resolution. If the parties to this agreement fail to resolve any conflicts related to issues covered in this agreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with the governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapters 164 and 186, Florida Statutes. See section 163.31777 (2) (h). 9. Oversight Process and Public Participation. Each year the parties to this agreement will each appoint an elected representative and a staff representative to meet and to consider the implementation of this interlocal agreement and propose amendments for improvement if deemed necessary. The county planning director or his or her designee, will schedule, coordinate, and facilitate the meeting. The public will be provided an opportunity to provide input at the meeting. Each governmental entity will be provided with a copy of any proposed amendments. If all parties agree to the proposed amendments, a written amendment to this interlocal agreement shall be executed. See section 163.31777(2)(1). 10. School Board Participation in Local Planning Agency. Each local government in the County with an existing public school will include a School Board staff representative as a member of the Local Planning Agency as a nonvoting member. Each local government will notify the School Board staff representative of the time, place, and agenda of all meetings of the Local Planning Agency. The School Board staff '. , representative may participate in deliberations regarding comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings at which the Locaf Planning Agency considers such amendments and rezonings that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. 11. As required by section 163.01(11), Florida Statutes, this Interlocal Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida, after the execution by the parties, and shall become effective upon the date of filing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the dates indicated. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman Witness as to Board: Secre ry Approved as to form: Date Signed: ~'L O Sch of oard Attorney SCH L BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY r ~ Countersigned: Mayor-Co issioner Approved as to form and Legal Sufficiency: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: ~ ~ ~ ~~s.~ City Manager Attest: ity Clerk y ~ --- d~ ~ ~ :.% < ZA i~ , , r t. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this~_~~day of by and between Pinellas County, a. political subdivision of the State of Florida, acting by and through its Board of County Commissioners, thereinafter sometimes referred to as the County} and the City of Clearwater, F1Prida, a municipal corporation within said Pinellas County;. acting, by and through i-ts City Commission (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the City), WITNESSETH: Whereas- the City, to insure an adequate supply of potable water for' distribution to its citizens, desires to purchase from the County a continuing supply of potable water which the County is able to furnish from and througYi~ its water supply distribution system, NC?W, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the moneys hereinafter agreed to be paid and the mutual covenants to be performed by each of the parties hereto as hereinafter set forth, said parties do hereby mutually agree as follows 1. The County agrees to furnish the City 10 mgd of water required by the City for its use and for redistribution in its water service area. The City agrees: to purchase from the County.a minirrium: of 1,:4b.0; 000., 0.0'0 gallons ~1 billion, 46{~ million gallons} of water within.~each calendar year thr-ough this agreement for its use and for redistribution in its water service area. This minimum purchase commitment= . bg the City is based on a yearly average consumption. Both Commitments will increase in dir-ect proportion to the water use increase fram the service areas transferred from the. County to the.. City in .this agreement. The County service areas to be transferred to --- , f NEW SERVICES AVERAGE DAILY USE GPD 300 Single Family Residence Apts. 1 bdrm.. (.4 x •300j 120 Apts . 2 bdrm. (. 5 x 3.00.} 150 Apts.. 3 bdrm. (. 6 x 300j 180. Trailers- (.7 x.300] 2.10 Duplex (1..4 x 300} 42'0 Triplex (1..7 x '300} ~ 510 Consumption of. all other new uses -will be. based on-meter size as follows.: 3 /~4!' (1. x 300) ~ 300 1" (2. S x 300} 750 1-1/2" (5 x 300} 1500 2" (10 x 300} 3000 3" (20 x 300} b000 4" (30 x 300} 9000 6" (10.0 x 300} 30000 8" (~ 175 x 300} 52500 The computed increased water use for the new services of the previous calendar year will then be added to both commitments for the current calendar year.. The,same method and schedule of computing water use in- craaae will be applied t.o. those County facilities and customers transferred ~„ ~to~ the City as described~iri this.agreement. These commitments will increase annually by the annually computed increased water use from the. transferred. service area throughout the term of this agreement. 2. ,The: County agrees.to furnish to the City from and through the P:n„nh,r~a matAr- a„nrlcs ane; r~~isxtri}»itinn avatem_ Anf~ the C'.itV SOrrees t0 D11I"Cha3e '~;` ' reasonable production and transmission costs that can be shown to be required for the supply of water to Pinellas County water users. The rate will become .effective October 1 of.the same fiscal year as the. budget and may then be revised at any time by the Board as necessary to meet the revenue requirements of the Water System. However, revisions after October 1, which result in .increased rates , will=not be effective until at least bU days after adoption by the County Commission. Adequate notice, of not less than 30 days, will be given to the City before any proposed rate. increase.is adopted:: The following factors shall be used in determining. the municipal rate. referred to herein: A.- Operation, maintenance, renewal and administrative costa. B. Payment obligations of annual principal and interest payments on water system bonded indebtedness . C. Collection of coverages or other reserves as required by Bond Resolutions and Ordinances. D. Pro rata share of the costs of providing production and transmission facilities for expansion .through r.e~venues of water s~ales~. E`. ~ .Paymen't o£ the cost of the water to the County, should it be~ purchased from other agencies, plus other costs to the ~. County required to furnish water to the City. as described in A through D of this paragraph. f 4. The quantity of water delivered to the City shall be measured ~..._ .. _...,.~.... .._ ~~~e..~ .,r e~....a.,..a ....~Le ~...~ e.,rr;..-.e..~ o;.,e vale..*o.i ~...i option upon. implementation of this agreement. 5. The City shall have the right to inspect or request at- its own expense, a test of the meter or meters .installed, at any reasonable time, in order to determiize. their accuracy. Should a test be made and the meter not meet AWWA Standards, the coat o€ the test shall be paid• for by the Gounty. The County agrees to maintain said meter, or meters, in proper condition s o as to accuxa.tely measure the water supply to the City.. 6. The County agrees that the supply of water to be' delivered hereunder shall be at all dines continuous, except that temporary ees.sation~ of..delivery of water at anytime caused.by Act of God, fires, strikes, cas.ualtie.s,. accidents , necessary maintenance work, breakdowns of or injuries to machinery, pumps or pipelines , civil or military authority, insurrection, riot or any other cause beyond the control of the County shall not constitute a breach of this agreement on the part of the County, and the County shall not in such case be liable to the City or its inhabitants for any damage resulting from such unavoidable cessation of delivery. 7. It is recognized by both parties hereto that the County supplies water to other municipalities on a wholesale basis, aid also to many thousands of retail us;ers; however, the.County. acknowledges. a primary responsibility to the City of C1'earwa der and other customers to meet their water •'require- . ~. rnents and agrees that,!it will not provide water for new expans.ion• when there is a need for. additional water. to serve present customers. .~ .~ 8.. .ATl.water delivered under. this. agreement shall conform as nearly as possible to the standards of the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, and the United States Public Health Service ~, ,, ~ ~'~ailuxe of the City to pay-,+vhen due any amounts billed un~er the terms of this agreement shall constitute breach of this agreement and the County's obligation to furnish water may be voided at the County's' option and the City will accept all responsibility for immediatly furnishing its citizens with water. Payments due beyond 30 days will draw reasonable iaterest charges monthly at the rate set by the Board of County Commissioners-. 10. All. parties agree that the area described in Exhibit .A herein. will be the farthest extension of retail water service by the City,, regardless of future annexa- Lion by the City-. Any en:croachmez~t by the City beyond this service area boundary, without written agreement from the County, shall constitute breach of. this agreement and the County's obligation to furnish water.' beyond the establish-ed service a~,rea boundary shall be void. It is the intent of both parties by adopting. and observing these service areas to avoid duplication of capital investment and maintenance-costs and to render water service to the public as efficiently as possible. it is further agreed that those County customers and water facilities which are within the City's service area described in Exhibit A and which can be readily incorporated into the City's water system will be transferred to the City as the neighborhoods are annexed into the City. If the County's water system is not transferred to the City at the time of annexation, the system will be transferred to the City as soon as it is practicable and economically feasible to do so. ;. The' City will. -pay the:. County an amount equivalent .to the current market cost of these facilities at the tizrie of transfer, lessdepreciation as determined by mutual agr.eement~'according to the .C-ounty's water system depreciation schedule. However,, the City will- not be r=equired to pay for those water di~s-tribution systems or -parts- of. systems which are not transferred. Payment will be made in full at the time of transfer or as determined by mutual agreement. 1 T '1'}~ia ~RrACr++u~t al~~ll Ho for ~ tArm of tl~irt~s~I~f11 zrP~ra rnmmAnrino . ... ~,~• ` ;12. Breach of this contract by the County as described in Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 10 does not relieve the County from the commitments per Paragraph I for the full term of this agreement ox from other obligations under this agreement. 13. The County recognizes the need for upgrading the County`s water system. in the Clearwater Service Area and agrees to develop a program, with assistance from appropriate Clear.watex• personnel, to improve fire protection facilities to City standards on the County's water, system within the City's Fire District on an orderly basis under the County's assessment authority. The County will provide - the- City with. a copy~of this upgrading program within six (6•)' months. of the effective date. of this agreement:.; The County further: agrees: to implement the program.at a ~ . capital expenditure rate of nd less than. $100, 000. per year. 14. This. agreement replaces and supersedes all previous agreements between the County and the City regarding water service. 15. This agreement may be terminated upon the mutual agreement of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Pinellas County, Florida, acting by and through its Board of County Comxanissioners, has caused this agreement to be executed in its name and on ita behalf by the Chairman of said .Board, its official seal to be hereunto affixed, attested by the Clerk of said Board, and said City, acting by and thr,oug~i itsCity Commission has caused this agreement to be executed • ~ in.i:ts narne.and on its beLialf~by its proper corporate officers-',- and its. corporate seal to be hereunto attached, the day and year /f/ir/s . ~ - ~ ~ - ~ DTAT ~'T 7 Attest: ROLD NiULLENDORE ,. ,; ~, • De C1erlc By ove written. C LINTY, O ~I ~. iairman CLTY OF~CLEARWATEI~C,. FI;OR:IDA a u. ~ !~. 1 .. ,. ~~~~ C1TY10F~~~1L .` J~ ~~ - a ~1 0 ~~ o 6 v S ~ O 0 o `~ ~ `;~ w w si- a W ;• ssc. .~. R. 48'. r e e SA ~---- ..~.. - - •~ •- ~ a l . l 1. }' ~ ` _ ~~ f''~Ir' J r _ ~~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 COMMISSIONERS KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL- CHAIRMAN SUSAN LATVALA -VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS JOHNMORRON~ TO: Interlocal Service Delive A reement Work Grou~1 Member ROBERT B. STEWART ry g p BARBARA SHEEN TODD KENNETH T. WELCH FROM: GOrdon BeardSlee, General Planning Administrator ~~"-~ Pinellas County Planning-Department t~ DATE: January 16, 2004 SUBJECT: Latest Information on Service Delivery Project Attached for your consideration is the revised version of the Interlocal Service Delivery Report, which references the completion of -the Pinellas Assembly Task Forces' Report. As you will recall, the December 29, 2003, mailout to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) indicated that the Assembly process was not complete, and that the Assembly results for Public Safety, Recreation, and Transportation would be sent once the Pinellas Assembly.Report was finalized. On January 9, 2004, the individual Assembly Task Forces presented their findings in a meeting of Task Force members, as well as affected governments; agencies, and' citizens. -The attached version, of the Interlocal Service Delivery Report reflects this milestone of the Pinellas Assembly process, and includes additional corrections/revisions to 'the text and tables. All changes are presented in red. Also attached is a complete copy of the final Pinellas Assembly Task Forces' Report, which was presented on January 9. What we now. propose is to include the Fire/Emergency Medical Services Structures and Financing .Report and the Law Enforcement Structures and Financing Report to address public safety,. the Recreation Structures and Financing .Report,- and 'thee. Transportation Integration Report as attachments to the Interlocal Service Delivery- Report, reflecting the intergovernmental coordination and service delivery issues .for each of those subjects, and the recommendations to improve coordination and service delivery. This would complete the. Interlocal Service Delivery Report. The next phase of the Assembly process will be for the Board of County Commissioners and the Mayors' Council to discuss the individual Task Force findings over the coming months- and determine how they want to respond to the recommendations. What we plan to do now, though, is to -send the completed: Interlocal Service Delivery Report to DCA, along with an accompanying letter explaining. the status of the Pinellas Assembly process. Each local government arid special district will be copied on the mailout. PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: ' 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 "Pinellas County is an ;Equal Opportunity. Employer" •Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace ~~ pointed on recycled paper ~lEIlB~~(~"~ IIDIEd,dRI1Ed8~I d~ Il~II1~IE]LILA~ c~'~~JI~'II'~Y ~~ ~~ve~~®~y a~~l ~~~e~~~e~~ ®~ ~e~v~ce ~e~~ve~~ ~~~ee~e~~~ ~anua~y ~ 5, 2®®~ SERVICE DELIVERY IN PINELLAS COUNTY An Inventory and Assessment of Service Delivery Agreements TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview of Pinellas County ...............................................................................1 Introduction .......................................................................................... l Pinellas Assembly ....................................................................................1 Discussion of Ezisting Coordination Mechanisms .....................................................2 Overview ..............................................................................................2 Effectiveness of Coordination and Coordination Agreements .............................3 Education .....................................................................................3 Potable Water ...............................................................................3 Sanitary Sewer ..............................................................................4 Solid Waste ..................................................................................4 Drainage ......................................................................................5 Public Safety .................................................................................5 Parks and Recreation .....................................................................6 Transportation ..............................................................................6 Inventory of Agreements ..................................................................................15 Duplication of Services ....................................................................................30 Service Delivery Deficiencies .............................................................................30 Agreements That Need to be Updated ..................................................................32 Overall Strategies to Help Eliminate Deficiencies/Gaps/Duplication in Service Delivery...32 Pinellas Assembly Task Force Recommendations ....................................................33 Appendiz (No one has submitted anythingfor the Appendix as of 1/14/04) .........................33 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Jurisdictions and Reporting Entities ...................................................8 Table 2 School Board of Pinellas County - Interlocal Agreements ........................9 Table 3-1 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship -Potable Water Systems.l0 Table 3-2 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship -Sanitary Sewer Systems.ll Table 3-3 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship -Reclaimed Systems.......12 Table 3-4 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship -Law Enforcement.........13 Table 3-5 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship -Fire Service ................14 Table 4 Municipal, County and Special District Inventory of Existing and Proposed Agreements .................................................................................16 Table 5 Duplication of Services and Facilities ................................................30 Table 6 Identified Gaps or Deficiencies in Service Delivery ................................31 Table 7 Agreements That Need to be Updated ................................................32 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Municipalities and Unincorporated Areas in Pinellas County Figure 2 Water Service Areas in Pinellas County Figure 3 Sewer Service Areas in Pinellas County Figure 4 Fire Districts in Pinellas County Figure 5 Law Enforcement in Pinellas County SERVICE DELIVERY IN PINELLAS COUNTY An Inventory and Assessment of Service Delivery Agreements OVERVIEW OF PINELLAS COUN Introduction Pinellas County is a mature urban county with over 938,000 permanent residents. The land area is small, about 280 square miles, but there are 25 local governments located within this small peninsular county. Importantly, the County is over 96 percent built-out. This set of circumstances is unique in Florida, and has resulted in, among other things, a long and necessary history of coordination in service delivery among governments and agencies. Figure 1 depicts the Municipal and unincorporated County boundaries in Pinellas County. It also includes the population and land area of each Municipality as well as the unincorporated County. In addition to coordinating with one another, the County and the Municipalities also coordinate routinely with several Special Districts. There are 36 Special Districts recorded for Pinellas County; however, they do not all have a relationship to the requirements of this Report. Following review of the 36 Districts, only those with a direct service delivery responsibility have been included in the Report. Pinellas Assembly While service delivery is generally well-coordinated throughout Pinellas County, it is not perfect. In May of 2002, representatives from area businesses, civic groups, neighborhoods, environmental groups, the cities and the county all came together to discuss the opportunities and challenges facing Pinellas County in regard to annexation, urban service delivery and financing, development and intergovernmental cooperation. The result of this landmark Assembly event was agreement to move forward with a series of task forces comprised of citizens, with staff support from the County and the Municipalities, to undertake a more thorough evaluation of the selected issues with the hope of moving towards long term and mutually beneficial improvements and solutions to benefit the County as a whole. The Task Forces convened throughout the Summer and Fall of 2003 to address: (1) Annexation Policy/Guidelines, (2) City/County MSTU/Division of Costs and Revenues, (3) Fire/Emergency Medical Services Structures and Financing, (4) Health Care Services, (5) Law Enforcement Structures and Financing, (6) Recreation Structures and Financing, and (7) Transportation Integration. In particular, the Task Forces addressing Fire/Emergency Medical Services Structures and Financing, Law Enforcement Structures and Financing, Recreation Structures and Financing, and Transportation Integration appeared to have a direct relationship to the new Chapter 163, F.S., Interlocal Service Delivery Report requirements. For this reason, the findings of the Pinellas Assembly Task Forces are included with this Report. These findings were formally presented on January 9, 2004, and reflect the deficiencies or gaps in those areas of intergovernmental coordination and service delivery. ISCUSSION OF EXISTING COORDINATION MECHANISM Overview The small size of Pinellas County, the presence of 25 local governments, and the rapid urbanization since the 1940s and 1950s has required the County and the municipalities to coordinate closely on the provision of essential public services and facilities, and to reach agreement on which local government is responsible for providing urban services to a particular area. In some cases, a Special District has been established to provide specific services for a specific area. There are few, if any, areas of the County today that do not have access to necessary urban services. The 25 local governments in Pinellas County actively coordinate with other jurisdictions and agencies to ensure effective service delivery through a myriad of formal and informal agreements and understandings. The use of interlocal agreements and related coordinating mechanisms remain the primary tools of formal coordination between, and among, other local governments and agencies. On a day-to-day basis though, informal communications, meetings, workshops, etc., remain the most common - and often most successful - means of intergovernmental coordination. Table 1 identifies each local government in Pinellas County and the Special Districts who are parties to agreements with local governments relevant to the delivery of services considered in this Report. Table 2 summarizes the type and amount of coordination/agreements existing between local governments and the School Board which facilitate the location of public schools as well as things like joint use of facilities and other site specific agreements. Tables 3-1 through 3-5 summarize the service provider/service recipient relationships for the provision of water supply, sewer service, reclaimed water, law enforcement and fire service. 2 Effectiveness of Coordination and Coordination Agreements Coordination in Pinellas County among the providers and the recipients of urban services is both necessary and extensive. In most cases, this coordination is effective, and the delivery of services is accomplished routinely and efficiently by the Municipality, the County or a Special District through a variety of agreements and arrangements. The following services are examples of effective service delivery arrangements, reflecting the long history of formalized intergovernmental and inter-agency coordination required for service provision in this small urban County. Education The Pinellas County School Board is responsible for public school planning, policy and education in Pinellas County. Coordination is extensive, ongoing and effective between the School Board, Pinellas County and the 12 municipalities with public schools (Clearwater, Dunedin, Gulfport, Largo, Madeira Beach, Oldsmar, Pinellas Park, Safety Harbor, Seminole, St. Petersburg, St. Pete Beach and Tarpon Springs). For example, interlocal agreements exist regarding public school siting (consistent with the Educational Facilities Act of 1995 and the more recent legislative changes made in 2002), coordination and sharing of information, the use of consistent population projections, etc. Table 2 depicts in more detail the types of agreements in place among local governments in the County and the School Board to coordinate on school siting, joint use of facilities, recreational uses, and public safety. Potable Water Table 3-1 and Figure 2 summarize existing service delivery arrangements for potable water. In Pinellas County, the primary provider of potable supply is the Tampa Bay Water Authority, a Special District. The two largest water suppliers in the County are Pinellas County Utilities and the City of St. Petersburg, who are both member governments of the Tampa Bay Water Authority and receive all of their water for wholesale and retail distribution from Tampa Bay Water. In addition to Tampa Bay Water, and the County and City of St. Petersburg water systems, the cities of Clearwater, Tarpon Springs, Dunedin and Belleair all own and operate their own municipal wells and water systems, although Pinellas County provides potable water as needed to ensure that their water demands are met. This is accomplished through long-standing interlocal agreements. In addition to routine requirements, agreements among service providers (e.g., between the County and the City of St. Petersburg) ensure the ability to share, or trade water when necessary for emergency purposes via specific interconnections among water systems. In all, the informal and formal coordination to ensure the availability of adequate and safe water supply throughout Pinellas County is both sophisticated and effective. 3 Sanitary Sewer Table 3-2 and Figure 3 summarize existing service delivery arrangements for sanitary sewer. In addition to public service providers, there are 2 private treatment entities (Top of the World and Dyna Flow). There are no areas of the County that are not included within a defined service area. This is due to a long history of Municipal and County-level urban services planning, including the delineation of service areas and commitments to building the infrastructure. Pinellas County Utilities maintains periodic contact with the private service providers, in order to anticipate, or plan for, any potential service delivery issues. Table 3-3 summarizes the delivery of reclaimed water throughout Pinellas County. It is likely that, due to sound long-range planning by Municipal and County providers, and extensive intergovernmental coordination, Pinellas County has perhaps the most extensive coverage for reclaimed water operations in the State. Solid Waste Pinellas County operates under the 1975 Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery Act, which was codified as Chapter 106 (Solid Waste) of the Pinellas County Code in 1988. The Act provides the authority and responsibility for countywide disposal of solid waste to Pinellas County. The Pinellas County Utilities Division of Solid Waste Operations is responsible for disposing of this waste in the most environmentally safe manner. To meet this challenge, the County uses an integrated approach to solid waste management that includes waste reduction, recycling, combustion with energy recovery, and landfilling. The capacity of the County's Resource Recovery Plant and landfill has been designed to meet the disposal needs of the entire County. As a part of Solid Waste Operations, the County also manages a countywide electronic and chemical waste collection program, an artificial reef program for the- disposal of certain construction debris, a metals recovery operation, and various recycling and public education programs. This combination of programs has been successful in managing the solid waste generated in Pinellas County. The Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery Act also created the Technical Management Committee (TMC) requiring representation from all of the Municipalities and the County to review and make recommendations regarding rates, fees, policies, programs, integration of new technologies, selection of consultants, etc. The TMC function provides an ongoing, collaborative and successful relationship among the service provider and the recipients of the service. The 1975 Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery Act does not address collection of solid waste, but rather addresses the disposal end of the equation. All of the incorporated Municipalities in Pinellas County provide solid waste collection either directly or through contracted services. Some Municipalities also provide service to unincorporated areas located within or immediately adjacent to their jurisdictional boundaries. Otherwise, both residential and commercial solid waste collection in the unincorporated areas of Pinellas County is accomplished under a free enterprise system 4 whereby each resident can select and pay for the level of service desired and change collection companies as needed. Drainage Pinellas County and the Municipalities coordinate routinely on flood control and watershed-related projects through informal processes and formal interlocal agreements. Many local governments have; and are implementing, stormwater master plans. In the process, coordination with other jurisdictions is routine in the case where a basin is in more than one jurisdiction or conditions upstream affect conditions downstream. In addition to local government service providers, the Pinellas Park Water Management District provides flood control in portions of the unincorporated area and the City of Pinellas Park. While coordination among service providers is generally good, there are some differences of opinion regarding areas of responsibility. While the intergovernmental and inter-agency coordination necessary for efficient service delivery in this County is largely effective, and is the result of many years of coordination, the results are not so clear in the provision of some services. The Pinellas Assembly process has resulted from increased concern over the effectiveness and efficiency of certain existing service delivery arrangements, finances, and responsibilities. In particular, the following areas of service delivery have been identified as issues through the Assembly process. The cities and the County are working together through the Assembly process to decide on appropriate approaches to resolving service delivery concerns. Public Safety The efficiency of Fire Protection and EM5 service delivery is the subject of a specific Pinellas Assembly Task Team. In addition, existing Law Enforcement arrangements and responsibilities are also being studied, and include an examination of funding mechanisms, data management, service delivery responsibilities and opportunities for better coordination towards more effective, equitable and efficient provision of fire, EMS and law enforcement services. Tables 3-4 and 3-5, and Figures 4 and 5 summarize existing service delivery arrangements for law enforcement and fire service. The Pinellas County Emergency Medical Services Authority was created in 1980 by an Act of the Florida Legislature. The Act designates the County Commission as the Pinellas County Emergency Medical Services Authority (EMS). Monies collected for services rendered and application fees for the First Care ambulance membership plan fund the countywide paramedic ambulance service in Pinellas County, which is provided by a single contracted ambulance service (Sunstar). The local fire departments provide first responder as well as paramedic Advanced Life Support (ALS) services that are funded by ad valorem taxes. In an emergency call, both the local fire department and Sunstar ambulance responds. This dual response concept ensures that medical assistance is onsite within 7.5 minutes 90% of the time. The Pinellas County EMS system has been recognized nationwide as a model system. 5 The Fire Authority was created by special act of the Florida Legislature in 1973. The Act designates the County Commission as the Pinellas County Fire Authority. The Fire Authority has the authority to establish the level of service for fire protection in both the unincorporated county and the municipalities. The Fire Authority contracts with 10 cities to provide fire protection services in 13 unincorporated areas of Pinellas County. Parks and Recreation Historically the County has focused on providing passive regional parks and preserve lands for the County's residents and visitors. The Municipalities have traditionally provided for the active recreation needs of their community, and unincorporated Palm Harbor has provided active recreational facilities for their community. In recent years, this arrangement has not been able to keep up with the demand for active recreation throughout the County. For example, unincorporated residents were increasingly turning to the Municipalities to meet their active recreation needs, and the municipalities were faced with increasing demand, limited opportunities for expansion in a built-out County, increasing costs to provide service, etc. Frequently, unincorporated residents were charged more for access to a Municipal recreation service. With awell-established regional park system in place, it was time for the County to respond to the increasing demand for active recreation. In early 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved a plan designed to begin looking at active recreation opportunities from both an unincorporated and countywide perspective. Implementation of that plan has begun. A Pinellas Assembly Task Force is currently looking at the coordination required to finance, partner in the delivery of, and expand the array of recreational options available to residents of Pinellas County in a manner that is both equitable and efficient. Transportation The Transportation Integration Task Force has started to focus on some key elements for integrating plans for providing a comprehensive transportation system with the resources needed to implement those plans. The Task Force is attempting to identify and recommend potential funding sources for the County's long-range highway plan, and look at the need for improved mass transit. An essential component of the County's transportation system is the support it provides to improving the quality of life for residents and visitors. For example, urban roadway design features, landscaping, and the construction of trails and sidewalks must be incorporated into improvements to the transportation system in order to reinforce Pinellas County's reputation as a quality urban environment for residents and businesses. Continued cooperation between the municipalities, the County, and the State will be critical to ensuring that adequate funding is earmarked for the needed improvements, and that the improvements achieve the community's quality of life objectives. In order to better visualize the extent and degree of urban service delivery in Pinellas County, several Tables and Figures are included in this Report. Figure 2 depicts potable water service areas, Figure 3 depicts sewer service areas. Figure 4 depicts the different Fire Districts in 6 Pinellas County and Figure 5 depicts law enforcement service delivery responsibilities. See the Section on Pinellas Assembly Findings/Results for conclusions and recommendations relating to improvements in public safety, parks and recreation and transportation service delivery. 7 TABLE 1: Jurisdictions and Reporting Entities Jurisdiction/District T e of Re ortin Enti . Town of Belleair Local Government Ci of Belleair Beach Local Government Ci of Belleair Bluffs Local Government Town of Belleair Shore Local Government Ci of Clearwater Local Government Ci of Dunedin Local Government Ci of Gul ort Local Government Ci of Indian Rocks Beach Local Government Town of Indian Shores Local Government Town of Kenneth Ci Local Government Ci of Lar o Local Government Ci of Madeira Beach Local Government Town of North Redin ton Beach Local Government Ci of Oldsmar Local Government Ci of Pinellas Park Local Government Town of Redin ton Beach Local Government Town of Redin ton Shore's Local Government Ci of Safe Harbor Local Government Ci of St. Pete Beach Local Government Ci of St. Petersbur Local Government Ci of Seminole Local Government Ci of South Pasadena Local Government Ci of Ta on S rin s Local Government Ci of Treasure Island Local Government Pinellas Coun Local Government East Lake Tarpon Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Lealman Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Palm Harbor Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Pinellas Suncoast Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Greater Seminole Area Special Recreation District Independent Special District Pinellas County Educational Facilities Authori Dependent Special District Pinellas County Emergency Medical Services Authori Dependent Special District Pinellas Park Water Management District Independent Special District Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authori Inde endent S ecial District Tam a Ba Water Authori Inde endent S ecial District Southwest Florida Water Mana ement District Independent Special District Pinellas Coun School Board School Board TABLE 2 School Board of Pinellas County Interlocal A reements School Facilities Siting Agreements Joint-Use- of-Facility Agreements Site-Specific Agreements (Recreation) Site-Specific Agreements (Non- Recreation) Law Enforcement, Public-Safety Agreements Transportation Jurisdictions With Schools Clearwater X X X X Dunedin X X Gul ort X X Lar o X X X X X Madeira Beach X X Oldsmar X X Pinellas Coun X X 3 2 X Pinellas Park X X X X X X Safety Harbor X X X Seminole X St. Petersbur X X 3 4 X X St. Pete Beach Tarpon Springs X X X X Sheriffs Dice of .Pinellas Coun X (Blanket-Use) X Special Districts 2 6 Public Colleges 2 Jurisdictions Without Schools Belleair X Belleair Beach Belleair Bluffs Belleair Shore X Indian Rocks Beach X Indian Shores X Kenneth City North Redington Beach X Redington Beach X Redington Shores South Pasadena X Treasure Island School Facilities Siting Agreement: A process for reviewing the locating of a proposed education facility. Joint-Use-Of-Facility Agreement: Terms and conditions for the long-term, shared use of multiple jurisdiction and school district facilities. Site-Specific (Recreation) Agreement: A Joint Use Agreement at one school site; typically for enhanced field facilities developed and maintained by the jurisdiction for use by the school and community. Site-Specific (Non-Recreation) Agreement: Examples include shared-parking lots, PSTA bus shelters and environmental monitoring stations. Law Enforcement and Public Safety Agreement: Examples include storm shelters and SRO services Transportation Agreement: Jurisdictional use for recreation transportation. TABLE 3-1 Service Provider/Serv ice Recipient Relationship -Potable Water Systems PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION U `~ ~ ~ a.~ U °' ~' ~ ~ ° a~ • ~ .~ c~ ~' ~ `~ U b ~ Q ~ `~' C7 `~ ~ ~ aaa ~ ~ ~ rix b1D ~ ? ~ ~a~ °q °' .~ ~ ? ° ~a~ o bA ~' '~ Hrn ~ b O Belleair X X Belleair Beach X Belleair Bluffs X Belleair Shore X Clearwater X X Dunedin X X Gulfport X X Indian Rocks Bch X Indian Shores X Kenneth City X Largo X Madeira Beach X N. Redington Bch X Oldsmar X X X Pinellas Park X X Redington Beach X Redington Shores X Safety Harbor X X St. Petersburg X X St. Pete Beach ~{ Seminole X South Pasadena }~ Tarpon Springs X X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor Unc. X E. Lake Tarpon ninc X Seminole (Uninc.) X Lealman (LJninc) X X X Tierra Verde Unc. X Remaining Uninc. X X X X' X X X X X *Only provides treated water; water distribution to customers is provided by appucaoie murucipai system as noted. Footnote to Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship (Potable Water Systems).'Water to Bear Creek area is supplied, on a.retail basis, by the City of Gulfport. 10/2003 10 TABLE 3-2 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship -Sanitary Sewer Systems PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION U ~ ,~ a.~ U ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ a, E--' ~ ~~ Q1 ~ ~ U ~ ~ Q a a ~, ~ O °~~° ~ tna po{],,, ~ H~ ~ .o ~~ ~ ~ ~U~O Belleair X' Belleair Beach X X Belleair Bluffs X Belleair Shore X Clearwater X Dunedin X Gulfport X* X Indian Rocks Beach X X Indian Shores X Kenneth City X Largo X Madeira Beach X X N. Redington Beach X Oldsmar X Pinellas Park X X X* X Redington Beach X Redington Shores X X Safety Harbor X* X St. Petersburg X X* X St. Pete Beach X* X Seminole X South Pasadena X* X Tarpon Springs X Treasure Island X* X Palm Harbor (Uninc) X E. Lake Tarpon (Uninc) X X Seminole (Uninc) X Lealman (Uninc) X X Tierra Verde (Uninc) X Utilities Included Remaining Unc. Areas X X X X X X X X * Sewer System only provides treatment. Footnotes to Service Provider/Service Kectpient tceianonsmp l~amtary sewer systems/ rw m process of purchasing Belleair sewer system. Should be completed 10/03. After purchase Belleair will be a PCU retail sewer customer. ZThis agreement provides wholesale treatment services by Oldsmar of County wastewater for East Lake.'PCU is wholesale customer of St. Petersburg sewer. City treats raw wastewater from Gulfport (Bear Creek) and Ft. Desoto Park.'Holiday provides collection services in certain unincorporated areas of greater Tarpon Springs. 10/2003 11 TABLE 3-3 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship Reclaimed Systems PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION ~ .~ ~ o i a,Uu; ~ o ~ o aU~ ~ °' U ~ ~ ~1 o ~ ~ .a ~ ~ b O °A ~ ~ }: a~~i via o ~ ~ a Hv~ Belleair X Belleair Beach X Belleair Bluffs Belleair Shore X Clearwater X X Dunedin X Gulfport Indian Rocks Beach X Indian Shores X Kenneth City Largo X Madeira Beach X North Redington Beach X Oldsmar X Pinellas Park ~ X Redington Beach X Redington Shores X Safety Harbor St. Petersburg X X St. Pete Beach X Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (Uninc) X East Lake Tarpon (Uninc) X Greater Seminole (Uninc) X Lealman (Uninc) Tierra Verde (Uninc) X Remainin Uninc. Footnotes to Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship (Reclaimed Systems): 'Pinellas County Utilities (PCU) buys surplus reclaimed water from Clearwater and Oldsmar to use in PCU's reclaimed distribution system. ZSt. Petersburg and Largo supply reclaimed water to PCU's Solid Waste Operations. 3Wi11 be retail customers of PCU when transmission line construction complete. Will also include Sand Key area of City of Clearwater. 4PCU to provide reclaimed water only to golf courses served by Belleair prior to buyout of their system by PCU. SGolf courses only except Lansbrook, which also includes residential customers: 6PCU provides reclaimed water on a retail basis to areas around and south of 54 Avenue which are in the City of St. Petersburg sanitary sewer district, but unincorporated county. This is done by mutual understanding between PCU and the City of St. Petersburg, there is no agreement in place. Areas include: Five Towns Condos, Parkside Condos, Townhomes of Park Place, 6000 Park Place, Bonnie Bay Villas, and Club Chalet MHP. Master meters in place. Source: Pinellas County Utilities, 2003. 12 TABLE 3-4 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationshi Law Enforcement PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION U ,~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ .U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N P;r'~i~ ~a° c°~w'a~ Belleair X Belleair Beach X Belleair Bluffs X Belleair Shore X Clearwater X Dunedin X Gulfport X Indian Rocks Beach X Indian Shores X Kenneth City X Largo X Madeira Beach X N. Redington Beach X Oldsmar X Pinellas Park X Redington Beach X Redington Shores X Safety Harbor X St. Petersburg X St. Pete Beach X Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (Uninc) X East Lake Tarpon (LJninc) X Greater Seminole ninc) X Lealman (Uninc) X Tierra Verde (Uninc) X Remaining Unincorp. Areas X acuealr Jnore contracts Wlth tielleali 1jeaCh Ior law enforcement services; a Redington Shores contracts with Indian Shores for law enforcement services (Source: Pinellas County Planning Department, 10/2003) 13 TABLE 3-5 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship Fire Service PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~, ~ w A .~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ay ~~ ~~ 3AA U sy ~~U ~i Belleau.. X Belleau Beach X Belleau Bluffs . X Belleau Shore X Clearwater X Dunedin X G ort X Indian Rocks Beach X Indian Shores X Kenneth City X Largo X Madeira Beach X North Redington Beach , Oldsmar w/uninc. area Pinellas Park X Redington Beach Redington Shores Safety Harbor X St. Petersburg X St. Pete Beach X . Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (LTninc.) X East LakeTarpon (Uninc. . X Greater Sem. (Uninc.) X Lealman (Uninc.) X Tierra Verde (Uninc., MSTU) X Remaining Uninc. Area X X 'Belleau and Belleau Bluffs operate together; Served by Pinellas-Suncoast Independent Fire District;' Contracts for fire services with Lealman Fire District; ° Served by Seminole and Madeua Beach Fire Depts.; s FL Power and Lockheed Martin (uninc. area) and other uninc. areas contract with Oldsmar; e NW part of uninc, area served by Pinellas-Suncoast Independent Fue District, remainder by Seminole Fue Distract; ~ Served by St: Petersburg Fire District; $ Gandy area served by St. Petersburg Fue District. NOTE: Trailer park in Redington Beach and a few small 'pazcels in Oldsmar are uninc. but are not part of official Fire District. 9 The Board of County Commissioners acts as the Fire Authority over the dependent fire districts. Source: Pinellas County Planning Department, 10/2003 14 NVENTORY OF AGREEMENTS The Inventory of Agreements that follows (Table 4) is organized by the required subject areas, in the same order provided in Chapter 163, F.S. The Inventory includes every agreement identified by the County, a Municipality or a Special District. The Inventory does not include absolutely every coordination agreement in place. For example, it does not include every individual project agreement for a specific capital project, utility project, or road project or other agreements of limited duration. To include every agreement to that level of detail among 25 local governments and special districts would be too unwieldy. The Inventory reflects a variety of arrangements -including agreements between the County and individual Municipalities, individual Municipalities and another Municipality, the County and several Municipalities, the County and Special Districts, Municipalities and Special Districts, the School Board and the County, Municipalities and Special Districts. Every Special District in the County is not represented in the Inventory. There are 36 special districts registered in Pinellas County. Following review of the information available from the State's website, for the purposes of this Report, only those Districts that provide a service related to the subject areas itemized in the Chapter 163, F.S., requirements are included in this Report (see Table 1). 15 TABLE 4 -Municipal, County and Special District Inventory of Existing and Proposed Agreements in Pinellas County Service Party t Party 2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes °~ Agreement Agreement ofAgreement Curtis Fundamental / ML King Center. Original 25-year lease effective 1/1/72 expired 12/31/96. Education Clearwater Clearwater Lease 1/1/97 12/31/2006 Automatic 10-year renewal through 2006 Comprehensive Education Dunedin Elementary Dunedin ILA 12/17/86 12/16/2006 Shared playfield-use agreement School Per agreement with Dunedin Jr Falcons (and city letter 1/22/97), city will Education Dunedin High School Dunedin ILA 1/22/97 N/A annually inspect poles Education Norwood Elementary Florida Department Lease 3/9/03 3/8/2008 FDOT leases 12 acres to the Board to be used by Norwood staff for parking School of Transportation Education Largo High School Largo Agreement 1/26/99 1/25/2004 Field use and lighting installation agreement; first initiated in 1994 Education Madeira Beach Gulf Beaches Lease 2/10/73 1/31/2016 N/A Public Library Education Madeira Beach Govt Land SA-N- Annual Report 1973 2003 Annual report (until 2003) of use, per instrument dated 1973 Elementary School 482 letter Palm Harbor Palm Harbor Initiated in 1996. Reciprocal field use with Palm Harbor Community Service Education University High Community Agreement 12/17/01 12/16/2006 Agency. School Service Agency Pinellas County School School Facilities Provides an alternative process and ]ocational criteria for reviewing a proposed Education Board Pinellas County Siting Agreement 9/10/96 30 days notice public educational facility and site plan. Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Pinellas County Facilities 8/28/98 8/27/2003 Except for disaster recovery efforts, all uses handled by additional-use forms Board Agreement Education Sandy Lane Pinellas County Agreement 12/10/02 12/9/2007 County's Air Quality Mgmt Division installed air monitoring station Elementary School Education Tyrone Middle School Pinellas County N/A 10/13/98 10/11/2003 County places monitoring station on portion of site Pinellas County School No termination Initiated in 1998. County can use site to deposit McKay Creek dredge spoils Education Board Wilcox Road Pinellas County Agreement 7/28/98 except by notice and 8th Avenue drainage pond excavation. Site Education Pinellas County All Cities ILA 09/10/01 09/30/13 Allows reciprocal use of library facilities and services to citizens. Library Cooperative Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Effective Date oP Expiration Dat Description/Notes Agreement Agreement - of Agreement Pinellas County School School Facilities No expiration Education Belleau 12/17/96 Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Ageement date Education Pinellas County School Belleau Shores School Facilities 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Ageement date Education Pinellas County School Clearwater School Facilities 3/11/97 No expiration Initiated in 1997 Board Siting Agreement date Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Clearwater Facilities I/1/O1 12/31/2006 Yearly exhibit update required Board Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Dunedin Facilities 6/1/00 5/31/2005 Initiated in 1980 Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School Gulfport School Facilities 8/12/97 No expiration initiated in 1997 Board Siting Agreement date Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Gulfport Facilities 2/9/03 2/8/2004 Initiated in 1996. Yearly letter renewal Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School Indian Rocks School Facilities 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Beach Siting Agreement date Education Pinellas County School Indian Shores School Facilities 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Agreement date Education Pinellas County School Largo School Facilities 9/24/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Agreement date Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Largo Facilities 8/22/01 8/21/2006 Joint use of facilities agreement Board Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Madeira Beach Facilities 6/10/01 6/9/2006 Uses now handled with additional use forms. Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School Madeira Beach N/A 4/25/01 4/24/2006 Bicentennial Park land used as park by City Board Education Pinellas County School North Redington School Facilities 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Beach Siting Agreement date Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Oldsmar Facilities 4/8/03 4/7/2004 Initiated in 1992. Renewed annually by letter Board Agreement Type of Effective Date of Expiration Daf Service Party 1 Party2 Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement Pinellas County School Pinellas County Blanket-Use Education g/25/98 8/24/2003 Initiated in 1998. Uses added by additional-use form. Board Sheriffs Office Agreement Education. Pinellas County School Redington Beach School Facilities 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Agreement date Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Safety Harbor Facilities 4/25/03 4/24/2004 Initiated in 1990. Annual renewal by letter Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School Safety Harbor School Facilities 10/22/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Agreement date Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School Seminole Facilities 3/11/02 3/10/2007 Initiated in 1997. Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School South Pasadena School Facilities 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996 Board Siting Agreement date Education Pinellas County School St. Petersburg School Facilities 1/13/98 No expiration Initiated in 1998 Board Siting Agreement date Education Pinellas County School St. Petersburg N/A N/A N/A Youth concert Co-Sponsorship Board Pinellas County School Joint-Use-Of- Facilities include schools (gymnasiums, athletic facilities, parking lots) and Education Board St. Petersburg Facilities 6/1/01 5/31/2006 parks, swimming pools, recreation centers, athletic facilities, and the Colisieum. Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School St. Petersburg Facilities 9/1/02 8/31/2007 Joint use of facilities agreement. Board College Agreement Pinellas County School SWFWMD and No expiration Sawgrass Lake. Automatically renews yearly w/no formal expiration date. Education Board Pinellas County N/A 8/4/76 date School Board provides resource teacher. Pinellas County School Joint-Use-Of- Initiated in 1989. (Reminder-add P.D. communications device on Tarpon Education Board Tarpon Springs Facilities 6/14/00 6/13/2005 Springs High School football field when the exhibit is renewed) Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Education Pinellas County School USF Facilities 9/12/00 9/11/2005 Joint use of facilities agreement, first initiated 9/12/91 Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School Pinellas Park Joint Use 09/11/03 5 years Umbrella agreement with Pinellas County School Board for facility use. Board Agreement School Board not required to comply with city permitting and siting Education Pinellas County School Pinellas Park ILA 02/10/00 No expiration requirements so long as School Board complies with Florida Dept. of Board date Education permitting and siting and Countywide Future Land Use 'Service ;. - Party 1 Party 2 Type bf Effective'Date of Expiration Dat `Description/Notes ..Agreement Agreement of Agreement Pinellas County, Clearwater, Dunedin, Gulfport, Largo, Madeira Beach, Oldsmar, Pinellas Park, Pinellas County No expiration Joint School Board/ Local Government Coordination per Section 163.31777, Education Safety Harbor, School Board ILA 5/1/03 date Florida Statutes, "1906" Agreement. Seminole, St. Petersburg, St. Pete Beach, and Tarpon Springs Education Pinellas Park Pinellas Park Agreement 9/9/92 9/8/2032 A 25-year review of agreement due in 2017 Elementary Education Countryside High Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 12/9/97 No expiration Initiated in 1997. PSTA has bus shelter on site School Transit Authority date Education Largo High School Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 12/9/97 No expiration Initiated in 1997. PSTA has bus shelter on site Transit Authority date Education PTEC (Clearwater) Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 12/17/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996. PSTA has bus shelter on site Transit Authority date Education PTEC (St Petersburg) Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 7/24/96 No expiration Initiated in 1996. Transit Authority date Southwest Florida Education Oldsmar Elementary ~'i'ater Management N/A 8/10/98 8/9/2003 Monitor Wells. Initiated in 1988 School District Education Azalea Middle School St. Petersburg Agreement 2/8/84 No expiration date Library agreement. No expiration date Education Campbell Park St. Petersburg Agreement 1/1/02 12/31/2100 Okayed by City referendum Parcel 1 for rec; parcel 2 for parking Elementary School City developed shared-use baseball fields on the southeast corner of the school Education Lakewood High School St. Petersburg Agreement 1/1/99 12/31/2008 site 30 days written preceptor Program allows students to obtain the necessary clinical and hands- Education St. Petersburg College Madeira Beach N/A 6/16/99 notice before 8/1 on experience in order to meet the requirements of the EMS program and Fire of any given Dept continuing education year Tarpon Springs Education Fundamental Tarpon Springs N/A 8/23/00 8/22/2005 Initiated in 1995. City uses east 23 feet of school site. Elementary School Service Party I Party 2 Type of Effective Date bf Expiration Dat Deseription/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement Tarpon Springs High Initiated in 1993. City installed lighting, rec teams get use of baseball field. 60 Education School Tarpon Springs Agreement 2/24/03 2/23/2008 day intent notice due in December 2002 University of South 30 days written Pinellas Park will host a representative from the Small Business Development Education Florida Pinellas Park MOU 05/25/00 notice Center to assist local businesses obtain federal, state, and local contracts. University of South 30 days written Students from the University of South Florida are able to complete an Education Florida Pinellas Park MOU 04/02/02 notice internship in Health and Wellness in the Pinellas Park Fire Department. Education Walter Pownall Service Pinellas Park Agreement 1995 No expiration Initiated in 1995, R/W agreement. Will need to periodically monitor status Center date Education Woodlawn Elementary St. Petersburg Lease 8/13/87 8/12/2086 City leased 8.1 acres to the Board to permit an upgrade to a full-sized school School 10/1/1988 (plus Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Largo ILA 10/1/83 automatic To create a common sanitary sewer service boundary. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 10/22/76 35 years Clearwater to treat wastewater from Safety Harbor. Parties had 3 previous contracts; this agreement permits Safety Harbor to Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 8/1/88 7/31/2018 increase its sewage capacity at the Clearwater Treatment Plant. Clearwater is providing wastewater treatement; Safety Harbor to regulate Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 11/1/99 N/A discharges to sewer system by adopting and enforcing sewer regulations. 11/28/84 (plus 5 Sanitary Sewer Dunedin Clearwater ILA 11/28/79 automatic To define the boundaries of wholesale and retail sanitary sewer service areas. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 6/23/00 10 years Largo to service parts of St. Petersburg. Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 8/21/1997 8/21/2007 Largo to provide reclaimed water to Carillon No expiration Provisions for sewer service, utilities, public services, annexation and Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 12/7/1983 date development in Roosevelt triangle and 28th St. N. comdor Sanitary Sewer Largo Pinellas Park ILA 10/18/2001 No expiration Largo purchase of Tract A sewer system from Pinellas Park date Clarifies that St. Petersburg shall provide service to Tract A-1 when they have Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg Amendment 2/21/2003 10 years the capacity to serve, but not later than 06/30/2010, also clarifies amounts due to Largo and services provided by St. Petersburg Pinellas County and To define boundaries of sanitary sewer services for properties. Conflict Sanitary Sewer pinellas Park Largo ILA 09/03/99 N/A ry ty resolution for volunta annexation into ci Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Belleau ILA Spring 2003 No expiration Belleau rums over its entire sewer system infrastructure to the County. date Service "Party l Party 2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Descriptlon/Notes .Agreement .Agreement of Agreement Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Belleau Beach ILA 9/25/01 25 years Wholesale wastewater treatment and dis osal agreement. No expiration date, but can be terminated by Ordinance and 9/4/80 (Ord.) the City with 60 Provides for Greenbriar Service Area and for Dunedin to provide sewer service Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 3/2/1982 (ILA) days notice and to the service area. Pinellas County to bill customers for sewer service. by the County with 6 months notice. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Indian Rocks ILA 9/25/01 25 years Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. Beach Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Indian Shores Agreement 10/12/82 No expiration Pinellas County purchased Indian Shores sanitary sewer system. date Madeira Beach pays portion of debt on South Cross Bayou Pollution Control Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Madeira Beach ILA 7/22/69 30 years Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. 03/01 /26 termination 25 years after the first 2 years. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Madeira Beach ILA 3/2/01 City may Wastewater transmission, treatment and disposal services terminate the Agreement with 180 days written notice Repay Pinellas County for the cost of constructing modified gravity flow sewer, Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Madeira Beach N/A 3/13/79 2004 metering facilities and appurtenances North Redington Beach to pay portion of the debt on the South Cross Bayou Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County North Redington [LA 3/14/72 30 years Pollution Control Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. Beach This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. Northeast Pinellas County Sewer and Waste Authority, Inc. also signed Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 12/11/79 20 years agreement. Oldsmar treats wastewater for County. This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 3/19/98 20 years Service areas established. Oldsmar agrees to treat 550,000 d. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 03/01/01 03/01/26 25 year agreement to accept and treat wastewater from Pinellas Park. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 08/12/03 08/12/28 Pinellas County will treat wastewater generated by Pinellas Park. Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Ef[ective Date of Expiration Dat Desci•iption/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement City agrees that should a minimum of 10 potential customers served by an Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 05/02/72 No expiration individual sewer line in its designated service area want the City to provide date sewer and the City does not do so within 6 months, County can provide sewer, then adjust their service boundary to show new area. Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Potable pinellas County Pinellas Park LOU 09/25/00 No expiration City will assist County in locating city-owned utilities for County projects when Water, Solid date requested. Waste Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 04/20/97 60 days written Allows for County charges of sewer services on water bills of Pinellas Park notice residents. Charges residents who use city water and County sewer. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Redington Shores ILA 3/1/01 25 years County to treat the Town's wastewater. A report was published in 1980 called the Clean Water Act 201 Facilities Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Safety Harbor Report/ 1980 No expiration Plan. As a result of that report, Safety Harbor's sanitary sewer service area Analysis date boundaries were established. St. Petersburg will treat wastewater from unincorporated areas of the County - Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 6/26/64 40 years Bear Creek. Expires next year. Unless otherwise County requested to pump sewage wastes created in Ft. De Soto Park to the Sanitary Sewer .Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 11/11/87 modified City for treatment. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Ta on Springs ILA 8/8/78 1/1/2000 To define the boundaries of sanitary sewer service areas. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County and Pinellas Park ILA 07/11/00 No expiration Establishes "Annexation Boundary Line" for Largo, Pinellas Park, and. Largo date annexation areas. Also establishes the Largo sanitary sewer service area. Gulfport was transporting wastewater to St. Petersburg from unincorporated Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Gulfport Amendment 2/10/70 5 years areas it intended to annex to (there is 1 agreement and 2 amendments for this). St. Petersburg to provide wastewater treatment to the parts of Gateway Center Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 3/12/97 30 years within Pinellas Park (Gateway Center Development). Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 03/01/02 03/01/05 3 year agreement to accept and treat wastewater from Pinellas Park. Sanitary Sewer Treatment Agreement. Provide sanitary sewer service for Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 03/12/87 30 years Gateway Center Development. Pinellas Park is retailer of sewage service for Gateway and St. Pete provides wholesale treatment not to exceed 500,000 GPD. Inter jurisdictional Pre-treatment Agreement where Pinellas Park agrees to Renewed every 3 adopt an ordinance that is no less stringent than St. Petersburg's. St. Petersburg Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 03/23/00 years acts as agent for Pinellas Park for administering technical aid and administrative aspects for Pinellas Park Sewer. Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Effective Date of, Expiration Date ' Description/Notes "Agreement Agreement ~°of Agreement Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg South Pasadena ILA 12/27/74 12/27/2004 South Pasadena will pay St. Petersburg for transmission of sanitary sewage. No expiration St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from St. Pete Beach at the Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg St. Pete Beach ILA 2/19/85 date Northwest Treatment Plant. St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from Treasure Island at the Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Treasure Island ILA 1/3/84 1/3/2009 Northwest Treatment Plant. Public Safety Bayfront Medical Pinellas County Agreement 1/29/01 9/30/2004 High Risk Perinatal Transport Center and LifeFleet Public Safety Belleau Bluffs Fire Largo Fire MOU 2/2/96 No expiration Fire Department First Responder Agencies. Department Department date Public Safety Belleau Bluffs Fire Belleau Contract 10/1/03 9/30/2009 Provide Fire Service to the Town of Belleau Department Public Safety Clearwater Pinellas Park Agreement 05/09/69 60 days written Mutual aid agreement for fire protection services. notice Public Safety Homestead Pinellas Park Agreement 08/24/92 No expiration Mutual aid agreement for disaster recovery services. date Public Safety Largo Pinellas Park Agreement 06/23/77 30 days written Mutual aid ageement for fire protection services. notice Public Safety Seminole Pinellas Park Agreement 05/22/80 60 days written Mutual aid agreement for fire protection services. notice St. Petersburg Junior St. Petersburg Junior College (now known as St. Petersburg College) allows Public Safety College District Board Pinellas Park ILA 08/29/85 No expiration City to use facility located at 7200 66th Street for sheltering families of City of Trustees date employees who are required to work during emergencies. St. Petersburg Junior St. Petersburg Junior College (now known as St. Petersburg College) EMS Public Safety College District Board Pinellas Park [LA 08/01/98 O8/O1/OS students may ride along with Pinellas Park EMS units to gain hands-on of Trustees experience. Florida Department of Pinellas Park 45 days written Allows Pinellas Park Police Department to access the Florida Crime Public Safety Law Enforcement Police Department Agreement 03/20/00 notice Information Center and NCIC. Florida Department of upon 60 day Public Safety Community Affairs - Madeira Beach N/A 2/6/01 notice by the Catastrophic Disaster Response and Recovery Division of Emergency City to withdraw Management Lealman Fire & Lealman Fire & Rescue, Inc. to provide fire protection services to Kenneth City Public Safety Kenneth City Rescue, [nc. Agreement 10/1/02 09/30/05 re laced on final a Bement dated 5/9/96 ( P g !~' )• When Dunedin annexes, the subject properties are no longer part of the Palm Palm Harbor Special Until otherwise Harbor Fire District. After annexation, Palm Harbor stops providing primary Public Safety Fire Control and Dunedin ILA 10/1/86 modified service and Dunedin takes over. This interlocal is required by Palm Harbor Fire Rescue District District's charter. Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of - Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement Palm Harbor Special pinellas County No expiration Public Safety Fire Control and LOU 6/1/00 Installation and maintenance of Opticom preemption equipment. Traffic date Rescue District Palm Harbor Special Pinellas County No expiration Public Safety Fire Control and Emergency LOU 12/13/00 To provide personnel for hazardous materials response. date Rescue District Management Palm Harbor Special Pinellas County No expiration Student-Ride-Along as part of medical program at Palm Harbor University Public Safety Fire Control and School Board ILA 6/21/01 date High School. Rescue District Tarpon Springs, South Pasadena, Safety Harbor, Belleau Bluffs, Fire protection services agreement to provide fire services for unincorporated Public Safety Pinellas County Dunedin, Pinellas Agreement 10/1/99 9/30/2009 fire district areas. Provides for payment for services. Park, Seminole, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Largo State of Florida, Automatic Public Safety Pinellas County Division of Agreement 5/12/92 Renewal for 1 N/A Administrative year terms until Hearings canceled Public Safety Pinellas County Financial Credit Agreement 6/21/94 11/29/2005 Collection Services. Services On-Line Medical Control for all First Responders and ambulance activities. Public Safety Pinellas County All Hospitals Contract 3/1/88 4/30/1998 System remains in place and is functioning. New agreement will be executed to provide funding of a new system in the future. Public Safety Pinellas County Belleau Bluffs Agreement 1/10/97 9/30/2007 Agreement establishes Basic Life Support (BLS) First Responder duties. Eckerd College, Agreement establishes Basic Life Support (BLS) First Responder and search Public Safety Pinellas County Inc. Agreement 3/10/99 9/30/2008 and rescue responsibilities. Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Effective Date of " Expiration Dat Description/Notes Agreement .Agreement.. of Agreement 18 entities (Belleau, Clearwater, Dunedin, East Lake Tarpon, Gulfport, Pinellas Suncoast, Largo, Lealman, Madeira Beach, St. Petersburg - Public Safety Pinellas County Oldsmar, Palm Agreement 10/1/98 9/30/2007 EMS First Responder Agreements Harbor, Pinellas All Others - Park, Safety 10/]/97 Harbor, St. Pete Beach, St. Petersburg, Seminole South Pasadena, Tarpon Springs and Treasure Island Public Safety Pinellas County Geac Public Safety, Agreement 7/16/97 N/A Ambulance billing software maintenance and support Inc Automatic Public Safety Pinellas County Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Contract 9/1/96 Renewal each January 1, unless Ambulance services. terminated 9/30/2004 (can be renewed for To provide exclusive ambulance transport service for emergency and non- Public Safety Pinellas County LifeFleet Agreement 10/1/99 two consecutive emergency patients. 3 year terms) Emergency Medical Direction Service. In the process of being extended for one year. Public Safety Pinellas County Medical Services Agreement 12/30/00 12/29/2003 Contract states two one-year extensions may be exercised. Group, Inc. Credit card service agreement which allows ambulance bills to be charged to Public Safety Pinellas County Bank of America Agreement 10/1/O1 9/30/2007 credit cards. Pinpoint Automatic Annual maintenance and support for ambulance services patient billing Public Safety Pinellas County Technologies, Inc. Contract 4/17/03 Renewal each software. fiscal year Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg Agreement 10/1/03 9/30/2006 Agreement establishes on-going Continuing Medical Education (CME) training College for all 1,350 personnel in the EMS system Service rty Pa 1 Pa 2 m' Type of Effectivebate of Expiration Dat riptlon/Notes Desc . A reement g A reemeat g ~ of reement Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg- MOU 3/14/97 No expiration provides direction for BLS services at the airport. Clearwater Airport date Public Safety Pinellas County St. Pete Beach Agreement 10/1/97 9/30/2007 Establishes municipal ambulance subscription plan in the city for all residents. Public Safety Pinellas County Superior Asset Inc. Agreement 6/21/94 11/29/2005 Collection services. Public Safety Pinellas County Axis Agreement 10/1/99 9/30/2004 GEAC rinting. Public Safety Pinellas County David Werfel Agreement 1/1/02 12/31/2005 Com liance audit/newsletter. Public Safety Pinellas County SMART Agreement 6/23/03 6/22/2008 Du lication for attorney requests. All Municipalities Automatic aid agreement in effect while Pinellas County BCC provides Public Safety Pinellas County and Fire Service Agreement 10/16/90 N/A emergency communication services to fire service providers. Districts East Lake Fire & Automatic Fire Protection Services for the Brooker Creek Preserve area and provides Public Safety Pinellas County Rescue, Inc. ILA 10/1/97 annual renewal firefighting foam and equipment Oldsmar Fire Automatic Fire Protection Services for the Brooker Creek Preserve area and provides Public Safety Pinellas County Department ILA 5/27/97 annual renewal firefighting foam and equipment Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called Public Safety Pinellas County Dunedin Lease 5/17/01 5/16/2021 anywhere in the County Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park Lease 9/11/01 9/10/2021 anywhere in the County Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg Lease 10/15/02 10/14/2022 anywhere in the County Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 10/2/00 10/30/2009 unincorporated Gandy Fire Protection District Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the Public Safety Pinellas County Largo ILA 10/14/99 9/30/2009 unincorporated Highpoint Fire Protection District. Public Safety Pinellas County Largo ILMAA 3/23/1999 1/1/2005 Mutual aid assistance for Police services Florida Department Hazard Mitigation Grant used to install hurricane shutters and window film on Public Safety Pinellas County of Community Grant 1/28/98 1/28/1999 Sunstar building. Project Completed. Affairs City to provide fire inspection and plan review services in the Gandy Fire Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 7/31/03 9/30/2003 Protection District. City to provide fire inspection and plan review services in the Tierra Verde Fire Public Safety Pinellas County South Pasadena ILA 12/19/02 9/30/2007 Protection District. Public Safety Pinellas County South Pasadena ILA 9/30/97 9/30/2007 City agrees to provide first responder medical services of a single ALS unit. Lealman Special Agreement to build a fire station in Lealman Park and for the County provide Public Safety Pinellas County Fire Control [LA 7/15/02 12/31/2003 up to $2.2 million for the project District Service Party l Party2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes - - Agreement ~ Agreement of Agreement Lealman Special Resolution authorizing the Quit Claim deed for Lealman property to be Public Safety Pinellas County Fire Control Resolution 9/18/01 N/A transferred to new special fire control district along with Assignment of Closest Unit Response Agreement, Bill of Sale of all assets and amendment to Fire District Protection Services Agreement Public Safety Pinellas County Largo Lease N/A N/A Lease of fire station property on Whitney Road to City of Largo for Fire Protection Services in the Highpoint Fire Protection District Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park Lease 11/8/90 9/30/1991 Lease of fire station property on Evergreen Avenue to City of Pinellas Park for Fire Protection Services in the Highpoint Fire Protection District 5 years plus 15 Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA Proposed one-year terms Lease of property and operations agreement for the County's centralized Fire College possible 20 more and Public Safety training facility years All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and Pasco ILA Proposed N/A and major cities County All fire agencies in Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Hillsborough and major cities County Public Safety Pinellas County All fire agencies in Pinellas and City o ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Tampa and major cities All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and ILA Proposed N/A and major cities Manatee County All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and City o ILA Proposed N/A and major cities Bradenton Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 10/1/00 9/30/2003 City agrees to provide Fire Protection Services for Fort Desoto Park Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg Lease Proposed N/A Lease of new Tierra Verde fire station and property for the city to use to provide Fire Protection Services for the unincorporated Tierra Verde area Public Safety Pinellas County Largo and Pinellas Resolution 12/20/83 No expiration Expansion of Largo and Pinellas Park Fire Service areas into the Highpoint Fire park date Protection District To define the obligations and responsibilities of the parties with respect to the Public Safety Pinellas County East Lake Fire & Agreement 10/14/99 90 days notice provision of fire protection services in the unincorporated East Lake areas of Rescue, Inc. the County. Public Safety Pinellas County Fire Districts Resolution N/A N/A Creates various fire districts (District resolutions on file). Public Safety Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 6/25/05 upon 45 day Building Dept Services Agreement: Flood Protection, Permitting and written notice Inspections Service Party Party 2' Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement 30 days written Department of Justice Coordination -Baker Act Transport Act for Minors Public Safety Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 10/15/02 notice (policy for information exchange). City to provide fire protection services to the Pinellas County Solid Waste Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 03/09/82 N/A Incinerator. Public Safety Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 1/1/00 12/31/2004 Mutual aid agreement for law enforcement agency. Public Safety Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 12/11/00 Notice Only Geogra hie Information System -sharing information. Pinellas County & 30 days written Coordinate services of law enforcement agency within Pinellas Park of abuse Public Safety Adult Protective Pinellas Park ILA 05/27/03 notice reports involving criminal and adult protective allegations. Investigations Pinellas County 9/30/07 Define the responsibilities for first-responder/ closest unit response to provide Public Safety Emergency Medical Pinellas Park ILA 09/03/97 (renewed each medical services Services Authority year) Pinellas County Fire 9/30/94 Pinellas Park to provide fire protection services to residents of unincorporated Public Safety Protection Authority pinellas Park ILA 01/01/91 (possibly area of High Point. renewed) Belleau Bluffs, Indian Rocks Beach, Madeira Beach, North Redington Beach, 9/30/2003 Public Safety Pinellas County Sherif Oldsmar, Safety ILA 10/1/02 renewed To provide law enforcement services. Harbor, Seminole, annually Dunedin, South Pasadena, Pinellas Park, Redington Beach, Kenneth City Pinellas Park and Pinellas County Sheriff agree to request and render law Public Safety Pinellas County Sherif Pinellas Park ILA 07/07/00 O1/01/OS enforcement assistance during emergencies. Child Protection Investigations Division to coordinate with law enforcement Public Safety Pinellas County Sherif Pinellas Park MOU 03/08/00 O1/Ol/OS agencies for child abuse, neglect, and abandonment investigations. Also & Cities outlines standard protocol. Public Safety Redington Shores Indain Shores Contract N/A Annual Renewal Police Service Public Safe ty Safe Harbor ty Pinellas Coun ty N/A 6/23/1998 Project Local Miti anon Strafe Work ou in effect er Resoulution 99-14 g gy' ~ p p Completion Public Safety Safety Harbor DRC, Inc. N/A 8/18/2003 5 years Debris management, disaster recovery services Service Party 1 ' Party 2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes , --Agreement Agreement • of Agreement 01/04/10 renewable for additional 10 years, termination upon mutual consent with 90 Joint Interlocal to provide Fire Suppression and EMS services to North Public Safety Seminole Madeira Beach ILA 1/5/00 day notice, Redington Beach, Redington Beach, and Redington Shores agreement will remain in effect for a period of 6 month after mutually agreed termination date Public Safety St. Petersburg Kenneth City Contract 9/11/96 Notice Only Provide services for Legal Service Forfeiture Act. St. Petersburg- Public Safety Clearwater Pinellas Park Agreement 12/12/98 04/01/05 To provide assistance to the St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport International Airport 30 days written Department of Children and Families Investigation Assistance -policy for Public Safety State of Florida Kenneth City ILA 1/2/03 notice information exchange. Public Safety St. Petersburg College South Pasadena ILA N/A N/A College agrees to allow the City to use its building as an alternate EOC Florida Department of All Cities and 60 da s written Y Statewide mutual aid a Bement - to et reimbursed for ex enses Burin ~' g P g Public Safety Community Affairs Independent Fire Agreement 12/12/01 notice disaster operations. Districts Public Safety Florida Department of Pinellas Park Agreement 06/30/03 06/30/05 To provide and receive assistance to and from other state agencies. Community Affairs By law, the County has the duty to dispose of solid waste. There is no need for Solid Waste Pinellas County All Cities Court Judgment N/A N/A interlocal agreements. As for solid waste collection, cities can implement their own collection and delivery services to the County's disposal facilities. Agreement regarding recycling grants. Parties agree to continue to work together to reach the goals of the Pinellas County Recycling Committee. The Solid Waste Pinellas County All Cities ILA 6/25/99 9/30/2004 agreement details how grant money, if any, will be distributed and for what uses. 9/30/84 with County constructed a Solid Waste Resource Recovery Complex in Pinellas Solid Waste Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 03/09/82 automatic 2 year Park; Pinellas Park to provide the required fire protection services for the renewals Complex. Tvhe of Effective Date of Expiration Dai ~ Service Party 1 Party 2 Agreement Agreement . ofAgreement i Description/Notes Solid Waste Safety Harbor Waste Managemen Contract 10/1/O1 3 years Curbside Recycling Contract Solid Waste Kenneth City Waste Managemen Contract 12/15/00 12/15/03 Curbside pickup and recycling Southwest Florida Solid Waste Water Management Madeira Beach Grant 10/31/01 6/30/2003 Grant for Stormwater System C-2 thru C-5 along 140th Ave District Drainage Treasure Island Madeira Beach N/A summer 2003 summer 2004 Street Sweeping Pinellas County, all cities, FDOT, and Pinellas Park Water Management Drainage Pinellas County All Pinellas County ILA N/A 6/16/2005 District providing for joint control of pollutants from public or private lands Municipalities within respective jurisdictions Drainage Pinellas County Safety Harbor ILA 3/29/1994 9/30/2008 NPDES monitoring Drainage Pinellas County and Safety Harbor ILA 10/25/1994 Project Alligator Basin drainage study, specific projects not budgeted. Cleaiwater Completion All Municipalities e Design and implementation of water quality monitoring program for NPDES Drainage Pinellas County (except St. ILA 04/17/03 09/30/08 Permit as part of County's MS4. Petersburg) Pinellas Park Water Project Drainage improvements to 82nd Avenue from 52nd Street North to 66th Street Drainage Management District Pinellas Park ILA 10/28/93 Completion North. 05/11/03 or when Agreement Provides for the construction of drainage improvements along the Pinellas Trail Drainage Pinellas County and Largo ILA 5/11/2000 is fully southward from Fairview Park across Ponce de Leon Blvd. to 16th Avenue Belleau performed, N.W. whichever occurs first Potable Water Pinellas County Oldsmar Agreement 12/11/70 5/14/2005 Purchase potable water from Pinellas County Potable Water Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 12/28/99 5/14/2005 0.5-1.0 mgd wholesale agreement. This water would be used by Oldsmar to service area outlined in uninco orated area. Potable Water Pinellas County Safety Harbor ILA 9/29/2002 5 years Retail service area, wholesale purchase agreement Potable Water Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 10/6/92 5 years 1 mgd max wholesale agreement to service unincorporated area. The minimum is 1 mg/month. Potable Water Pinellas County Tatpon Springs ILA 12/1/92 5 years 1.65-4.0 mgd wholesale agreement. Potable Water Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 1/28/88 20 years 3.7-7.5 mgd wholesale agreement. Potable Water Pinellas County Largo ILA 1/25/72 No expiration date Agreement allowing Pinellas County to operate Largo's water system. Potable Water Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 3/19/76 30 years Ex fires 9/30/05. This is a 10 mgd wholesale agreement. Service Party I ~ Party 2 Type of - EffectiveDate of Expiration Dat Description/Notes ? Agreement Agreement of Agreement Potable Water Pinellas County Kenneth City Resolution N/A N/A Resolution approving the purchase of water for the Town from Pinellas County. This agreement transfers the right to operate Largo's existing water system to Potable Water Pinellas County Largo [LA 10/1/7S No expiration Pinellas County. The County will pay Largo for outstanding debt and debt date serviced. Potable Water Pinellas County Belleair ILA S/7/96 S years This is an agreement for up to 1 mgd of "emergency service (wholesale)." The new agreement is an emergency exchange service. upon 60 day Water System Billing to include collection for City Services of sanitary system, Potable Water Pinellas County Madeira Beach 6/23/97 refuse collection, and stormwater fee on the same bill as that of the County written notice water services Allows Pinellas County to distribute water conservation kits to 21,541 Potable Water Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 11/12/92 N/A households in Pinellas Park. Potable Water Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 10/25/90 30 days written Agreement to allow water and sewer service turn-off between city and county. notice Potable Water Pinellas County South Pasadena ILA 9/24/91 9/24/2021 Operation and Maintenance of reclaimed water system and St. Pete Beach Unanimous consent or upon direction of 2 Pinellas County, Pasco member Establishes Tampa Bay Water (formerly known as the West Coast Regional County, Hillsborough govemments if a Water Supply Authority) who is the sole wholesale water supplier to member Potable Water County, St. Petersburg, Tampa Bay Water ILA 10/1/98 material govemments. There are limited exceptions to exclusivity for members to keep Tampa, and New Port provision of the some facilities. Richey ILA is substantially modified by the FL Legislature. Potable Water/ Pinellas Park Water No expiration Conveyence of Tingley Park from water management district to city for Sanitary Sewer Management District Pinellas Park ILA 12/20/00 date arkland/ o ens ace. p P p Wholesale agreement. Oldsmar will buy water from St. Petersburg. There is a Potable Water St. Petersburg Oldsmar ILA S/18/79 2 years notice reference to Gulfport buying water from St. Petersburg. 30 year term Potable Water St. Petersburg Gulfport ILA 10/6/88 plus automatic St. Petersburg will sell potable water to Gulfport. renewal each year St. Petersburg to furnish potable water to South Pasadena for a period of 5 Potable Water St. Petersburg South Pasadena Resolution 1/11/96 1/1(/2001 years. Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Dcscri tion/Notes p Agreement Agreement of agreement '~ Parks and pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 3/25/98 4/14/2031 (Mobbly Bay) management of property to preserve and protect its natural state Recreation Parks and (Mobbly Bay) Clarify responsibilities in management of property in Interlocal Recreation pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 4/5/01 4/4/2100 Agreeement dated 3/25/98 Parks and Oldsmar Eastlake Oaks City Ordinance 10/3/95 Ongoing until Establishing the Eastlake Oaks Community Development District Recreation (95-20) repealed 09/30/05, with automatic 1 year Parks and pinellas County Largo ILA 4/22/1998 renewals until N/A Recreation project completion Parks and City to operate and maintain facility. Profits from operation of the parking Recreation Pinellas County Madeira Beach ILA 1/25/83 30 days notice meters will be split 50/50. City to install and maintain parking meters at beach access. The County will Parks and pinellas County St. Pete Beach ILA 5/19/87 90 days notice install and maintain parking spaces. City and County will share proceeds Recreation (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. City to install and maintain parking meters at beach access. The County will Parks and pinellas County Indian Shores ILA 2/14/95 90 days notice install and maintain parking spaces. City and County will share proceeds Recreation (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. The agreement outlines sale and acquisition of parcels to develop Sand Key Parks and pinellas County Clearwater ILA 11/20/73 No expiration park. The agreement outlines duties and obligations of both Clearwater and the Recreation date County. Parks and pinellas County Clearwater ILA 1/28/86 90 days notice City to provide lifeguards and first-aid for the County Park on Sand Key. Recreation City to install and maintain parking meters at Sand Key Park. The County will Parks and pinellas County Clearwater ILA 7/25/84 90 days notice install and maintain parking spaces. City and County will share proceeds Recreation (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and pinellas County Clearwater ILA 9/28/82 No expiration Development and management of Sand Key Park. Recreation date Parks and Hillsborough Outlines operation and maintenance requirements of each county for the Recreation pinellas County County ILA 11/23/99 30 days notice Friendship Trail Bridge Southwest Florida Water Managemen t County Default Construction and management of water management project and nature study/ Parks and pinellas County District/ Pinellas ILA 8/4/76 or 60 Da s y recreational facility. The agreement has three amendments dated 7/18/78, Recreation County School Notice by 9/9/80, and 6/20/88. District Board ' Type~of ~ EffeetiveDate of Expiration Dat Service -Party 1 - Party 2 Description/Notes Agreement Agreement otAgreement Pinellas County helped purchase St. Andrew's Links Golf Course along with the Parks and Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 3/18/03 No expiration City of Dunedin. County citizens who reside within [he unincorporated areas of Recreation date Pinellas County are entitled to use certain recreation facilities as specified for the same fees as if they were residents of Dunedin. Parks and pinellas County Pinellas MPO MOU 9/8/77 60 days notice Pinellas agrees to provide the MPO with support services. Recreation Parks and No expiration Create awalk-in park in an area south of West Bay Drive and a sailboat Recreation pinellas County Belleau Bluffs Lease 6/25/74 date launching site in an area north of West Bay Drive. Parks and project pinellas County Clearwater ILA 8/20/96 pinellas Trail and sidewalk construction from Belleview Blvd. to Jones St. Recreation Completion Parks and project To establish a PSTA bus stop along 196th St. to enhance citizen access to the pinellas County Indian Shores License 2/17/93 Recreation Completion beach. Parks and pinellas County South Pasadena ILA 5/3/89 5/3/2014 Park maintenance agreement for Habitat Park on Pasadena Avenue Recreation Parks and Until otherwise Town to install and maintain parking devices. The County to maintain the pinellas County Redington Shores ILA 11/4/98 Recreation modified parking areas. Parks and Pinellas County and Florida Department No expiration Transfer ownership of the Old Gandy Bridge to the two counties for the ILA 10/15/97 Recreation Hillsborough County of Transportation date Friendship Trail Bridge. (plus 1 license agreement dated 12/1/99.) Parks and Pinellas County School Madeira Beach ILA 6/10/01 6/9/2006 Use of Madeira Middle and Elementary Schools Recreation Board Parks and Pinellas County School Madeira Beach Park Lease 4/25/01 4/24/2006 Bi-Centennial Park Lease Recreation Board Parks and Safety Harbor Center Foundation/ ILA 4/19/1991 4/19/2006 Use of Long Center for programming Recreation Clearwater Transportation pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 10/1/00 9/30/2005 Maintenance of traffic control signals and devices Facilities Transportation pinellas County Oldsmar [LA 1/1/92 8/31/2007 Loca] Option Gas Tax -authorization of up to 6 cents per gallon Facilities Transportation Safety Harbor, Tarpon Providing for joint membership representation on Pinellas Suncoast Transit Facilities Springs Oldsmar ILA 8/16/94 Ongoing Authority's (PSTA) Board of Directors Oldsmar and other Transportation pinellas County Pinellas County ILA 9/26/02 Ongoing Creation of Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Facilities Municipalities Transportation Provides for maintenance of traffic control signals and devices in Dunedin by Facilities pinellas County Dunedin ILA 10/1/Ol 9/30/2006 pinellas County. Transportation Florida Department of No expiration Provides for City of Dunedin to maintain street lights within State rights-of- Dunedin ILA 6/24/03 Facilities Transportation date way. Service Parry 1 Party 2 Type of 'Effective Date of Expiration Daf Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement Transportation Florida Department of 12/21 /2003 Installation and maintenance of landscaping by the City on State Road 55 Facilities Transportation Pinellas Park MOA 12/21/93 (10 years w/ one between US Highway 19 and 49th Street. 10 year renewal) Transportation Florida Department of 60 days written Reciprocal agreement waiving access fees for projects within each others' Facilities Transportation Pinellas Park ILA 01/10/91 notice jurisdiction. 10 years with Transportation Florida Department of Pinellas Park MOA 05/13/93 one 10 year City to maintain SR 55 between 49th Street and 102nd Avenue Facilities Transportation renewal Transportation Florida Department of Pinellas Park ILA 09/20/79 No expiration City may install traffic signals on state roads with approval from the Florida Facilities Transportation date Department of Transportation. Transportation Florida Department of 6/30/2004 City will provide maintenance service for traffic control signals and devices on Facilities Transportation Pinellas Park ILA 07/01/03 Renewed Florida Department of Transportation situated roadways in Pinellas Park. Annually 6/30/2004 City will provide maintenance service for traffic control:signals and Transportation Florida Department of Pinellas Park ILA 07/01/03 Renewed streetlighting devices on Florida Department of Transportation situated Facilities Transportation Annually roadways in Pinellas Park. Transportation Florida Department of Safety Harbor ILA 6/13/2003 No expiration Street light maintenance. Facilities Transportation date Transportation Florida Department of South Pasadena ILA 6/11/03 6/11/2008 Florida Department of Transportation pays South Pasadena to maintain street Facilities Transportation lighting on Pasadena Avenue Transportation Florida Department of South Pasadena ILA 6/11/02 6/11/2007 Florida Department of Transportation pays South Pasadena to maintain traffic Facilities Transportation signals on Pasadena Avenue Pinellas Suncoast South Pasadena ILA 8/7/03 8/7/2004 Operation of local circulator bus two mornings per week Transportation Transit Authority renewed Facilities annually Transportation Pinellas Suncoast South Pasadena Referendum 10/5/82 No expiration South Pasadena is a member of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority and bus Facilities Transit Authority date service is provided indefinite, but maybe Reimburse Madeira Beach the actual cost of fuel per invoice plus a $0.10 per Transportation North Redington Madeira Beach ILA 10/2/95 terminated by i h i gallon administrative fee. Madeira Beach reimburses North Redington Beach Facilities Beach ther party w t e . its pro rata share of any fuel tax refunds or rebates received 30 days written notice Transportation pinellas County Madeira Beach N/A 1/1/92 8/31/2007 6th Cent Local Option Gas Tax Facilities Transportation County will provide maintenance service for Traffic Control Signals and Facilities Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Devices situated in Pinellas Park. Transportation No expiration Transfer 110th Avenue North from 58th Street North to US Highway 19 North Facilities Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 07/27/00 date from County to City. Transportation pinellas County Safety Harbor N/A 2/25/1999 Project Enterprise Road sidewalks. Facilities Completion Transportation pinellas County Safety Harbor N/A N/A project Intersection improvement at SR 590 and McMullen Booth Road. Facilities Completion Service 'Par'ty I ; Party2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat ` Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 09/01/97 08/31/07 Gas tax agreement- allows county to collect six cents per gallon and distribute Facilities (Cities in County) 25% to cities. Can only be Transportation Pinellas MPO Pinellas County MOA 10/22/78 terminated by Ensures participation in transportation planning. Facilities School Board the School Board. Transportation Pinellas MPO Hillsborough ILA 6/21/05 30 days notice Only amendment in file 3/25/00 (HIV transportation service 3/1/99). Facilities County Transportation pinellas MPO Safety Harbor N/A 4/14/1999 No expiration Transportation planning membership, review every 5 years Facilities date Transportation Pinellas Suncoast Madeira Beach Contract 6/8/76 No expiration No termination date established. Facilities Transit Authority date Transportation Pinellas Suncoast Pinellas Park ILA 03/13/03 No expiration Allows PSTA to install and provide passenger shelters within the boundaries of Facilities Transit Authority date Pinellas Park. Transportation Pinellas Suncoast Safety Harbor N/A 9/16/1994 No expiration Countywide transit authority membership Facilities Transit Authority date Transportation pinellas County Largo ILA 10/1/2000 9/30/2005 Maintenance of traffic control signals and devices Facilities Largo, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin, Pinellas ILA 8/17/1993 No expiration Reestablishes the Metropolitan Planning Organization Facilities park, Oldsmar, date Safety Harbor, Tarpon Springs, PSTA Oldsmar and other Transportation pinellas County Pinellas County ILA 2/1/00 1/31/2010 Penny For Pinellas 1% sales surtax for infrasstructure Facilities Municipalities Remain in full Transportation Pinellas County Belleau Agreement 06/06/79 affect unless or Defines that the County will maintain Mehlenbacher Rd with Belleau C/L's and ' Facilities until terminated the CITY will maintain Indian Rocks Rd and Rosery Rd within their C/L s Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain W Bay Dr from Gulf Blvd to Belleau Pinellas County Belleau Beach Agreement 10/27/70 affect unless or Bl ff C/L' Facilities until terminated u s s Remain in full Transportation pinellas County Belleau Beach Agreement 10/27/70 affect unless or Defines that the County will maintain Gulf Blvd within Belleau Beach C/L's Facilities until terminated Service 'Party 1 _ Party 2 Type'of Effecfive:Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes - ' : Agreement Agreement of Agreement Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain W Bay Dr from Belleau Beach C/L's to Facilities Pinellas County Belleau Bluffs Agreement 06/16/70 affect unless or il i d Largo C/L's unt term nate Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Mehlenbacher Rd with Belleau Bluffs Pinellas County Belleau Bluffs Agreement 11/08/79 affect unless or C/L' Facilities until terminated s Remain in full Transportation pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 affect unless or Defines that the County will maintain Keene Road from Drew St to Palmetto St Facilities until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain Belcher Rd from a oint S of Nurse Rd h' P rY Facilities Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13!71 affect unless or to a point N of Drew St until terminated Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Hercules Ave from Beverly Dr to Kendall Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 affect unless or Dr and from a point north of Magnolia Dr to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd and from Sunset Facilities until terminated Point Rd to Union Street Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain Hi hland Ave from Belleau Rd to Lemon tY g Facilities Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 affect unless or St; and from Tan Brine St to Union St S until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain Sunset Point Rd from US 19A to Keene h' Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 affect unless or Rd Facilities until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain Nurse Rd from Hi hland Ave to US ty n' g Facilities Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 07/10/79 affect unless or 19; and that the City will maintain Highland Ave from SR 60 to Union St until terminated Remain in full Transportation pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 08/09/79 affect unless or Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from Belleau Rd to SR 580 Facilities until terminated Defines that the County will maintain Union St from US 19A to Hercules Ave; This Agreement and Montclair Rd/Old Coachman Rd from Hercules Ave to SR 60; and . maybe modified Palmetto St from Hercules Ave to Belcher Rd; and Lake Ave from SR 60 to the Transportation pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 12/29/81 or amended only southerly C/L's of Clearwater; and Betty Lane from Palmetto St to Sunset Point Facilities by an agreement Rd. It also defines that the City will maintain Bayshore Blvd from SR 60 to in writing Safety Harbor C/L's; and Lakeview Ave from US 19A to Missouri Ave; and Myrtle Ave from Lakeview Ave to US 19A Service Party 1 Party2 Type of Effective Datc of Expirutiuu Dut Description/Notes Agreement Agreement - ofAgreement ., Transfers full ownership and responsibility for CR 255 (also known as Transportation Remain in full Coronado Dr -from Gulfview Blvd to Causeway Blvd) and CR 245 (also Facilities Pinellas County Clearwater ILA N/A affect unless or known as both S Gulfview Blvd from Gulf Blvd to Gulfview Blvd; and until terminated Gulfview Blvd from Gulfview Blvd S to Coronado Dr) Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain CR 1 within Dunedin C/L's as defined at tY Facilities Pinellas County Dunedin Agreement 08/11/70 affect unless or the date of execution. until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Count will maintain Vir inia Ave from Main St to Lake Y g Pinellas County Dunedin Agreement 08/11/70 affect unless or Haven Dr Facilities until terminated This Agreement States the County will own and maintain CR 1 from Main St to Curlew Rd; CR may be modified 712 (Dunedin Cswy) from W End to US 19A; Union St from US 19A to Transportation pinellas County Dunedin ILA 12/17/81 or amended only Hercules Ave, Belcher Rd from City of Dunedin S C/L's to Curlew Rd. States Facilities by an agreement the City will own and maintain New York Ave from Main St to San in writing Christopher Dr. Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Gulfport Blvd and 22nd St S within Transportation pinellas County Gulfport Agreement 06/30/70 affect unless or Gulfport C/L's (further defined as from 64th St to 49th St N) from the date of Facilities until terminated execution. Transportation Indian Rocks Remain in full Defines that the Count will maintain Gulf Blvd from 5th Ave to the Town of Y Facilities Pinellas County Beach Agreement 11/15/73 affect unless or Belleau Beach C/L's until terminated Transportation Defines that the County will maintain those portions of 54th Ave N within pinellas County Kenneth City Agreement 06/05/75 N/A C/L's Kenneth Cit Facilities y This Agreement maybe modified Defines that the County will maintain those portions of 58th St N from 38th Transportation pinellas County Kenneth City Agreement 12/08/81 or amended only Ave N to 70th Ave N; and 46th Ave N from 66th St N to 37th St N within Facilities by an agreement Kenneth City C/L's in writing Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Starkey Road from the SW comer of 36- Transportation pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 affect unless or 29-15 to E Bay Dr Facilities until terminated Service Party 1 Party 2 Type oC Effective Date of. Expiration Dat Descrip6on/Notes .Agreement Agreement of Agreement Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Highland Ave from E Bay Dr to Belleau Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 affect unless or Rd Facilities until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain W Bay Dr from Belleau Bluffs C/L's to Facilities Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 affect unless or Clearwater Largo Rd until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Belleau Rd from Highland Ave to Keene Facilities Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 affect unless or Rd until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from 138th Ave N to a point Facilities Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 affect unless or S of E Bay Dr until terminated This Agreement Transportation maybe modified Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from 126th Ave N to Belleau Pinellas County Largo Agreement 09/11/79 or amended only Rd Facilities by an agreement in writing Transfersfull ownership and responsibility for CR CR385 and 434 (also known Transportation Remain in full as McMullen Road from Lake Ave to Keene Road) and CR 395 (also known Facilities pinellas County Largo ILA N/A affect unless or Alternate Keene Road from E Bay Drive to McMullen Road) and Fulton Dr SE until terminated from Willow Ave to E Bay Drive Transfers full ownership and responsibility for CR 581 (also known as 58th St Transportation Remain in full . N from 62nd Ave N to 70th Ave N) and a portion of CR 583 (58th St N from Facilities Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 05/25/89 affect unless or ) 82nd Ave N to 102nd Ave N and CR 298 102nd Ave N from 66th St N to until terminated 58th St N) Transfer of roadway the County to Pinellas Park that include JAN CORY Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 07/23/01 No ex iration P SUBDNISION STREET RIGHT OF WAY, 69th Ave N between 66th St N and Facilities date 67th St N, and 44th St N between 118th Ave N and 130th Ave N Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Park St from South Pasadena C/L's to Facilities Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 affect unless or T one Blvd aka SR 595 Yr ( ) until terminated Service ` Party 1 Party 2 Type'of Effective'Date of Expiration Dat bescription/Notes 'Agreement Agreement of Agreement Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Gulfport Blvd and 22nd Ave S from Facilities pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 affect unless or Gulfport City Limits to 4th St N until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain 38th Ave N from Tyrone Blvd to Haines Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 affect unless or Rd Facilities until terminated Remain in full Transportation pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 affect unless or Defines that the County will maintain 54th Ave N from 24th St N to 9th St N Facilities until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain 9th St N from Haines Rd to Gand h' Y F ili i Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 affect unless or Brid a Blvd ac t es until terminated g Transportation Remain in full Transfers full ownership and responsibility for that portion of Central Avenue Facilities Pinellas County St Petersburg ILA 10/14/97 affect unless or formed CR 150 from 34th St N US 19 to 3rd St SR 92 ( Y ) ( ) ( ) until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain Florida Ave from CR 80 currentl tY ( Y Facilities Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 affect unless or Curlew Pl to Sunset Dr ) until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the County will maintain Orange St/Riverside Dr and Spring Blvd Facilities Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 affect unless or from Gulf Rd to US 19A until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain one route known as Gulf Rd/Whitcomb tY Facilities Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 affect unless or Blvd/Carolina Ave/Meres Blvd from Florida Ave to US 19A until terminated Transportation Remain in full Defines that the Coun will maintain Sunset Dr from Howard Park to Florida tY Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 affect unless or A e Facilities until terminated v This Agreement Defines that the County will maintain (1) Gulf Rd/Whitcomb Blvd/Carolina may be modified Ave/Meres Blvd from Florida Ave to US 19A; and (2) West Tarpon Avert Transportation pinellas Coun h Ta on S rin s ~ P g A Bement ~ 09/14/83 or amended onl Y S rin Blvd/Riverside Dr/Ta on Dr from Gulf Rd to US 19A; and 3 Sunset P g Tp () Facilities by an agreement Dr from Howard Park to Florida Ave; and (4) Meres Blvd from Florida Ave to in writing US 19A; and (5) Live Oak St from US 19A to US 19 Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement Remain in full Sets the terms and conditions for the County to transfers full ownership and Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs ILA 07/27/93 affect unless or responsibility for Live Oak Street from US 19A to US 19 in exchange for Facilities until terminated funding This Agreement may be modified Clarifies that the CITY will own and maintain 107th Avenue /Treasure Island Transportation Pinellas County Treasure Island Agreement 04/06/82 or amended only Cswy from Gulf Blvd to the western C/L's of St Petersburg; and, West Gulf Facilities by an agreement Blvd from it southern terminus to Gulf Blvd in writing Termination is Sets the terms and conditions for the County to provide funding to Dunedin to Transportation subject to non- beautify (landscape) certains areas along CR 712 (Dunedin Cswy) within the Facilities pinellas County Dunedin [LA 06/25/01 performance or road right-of--way areas in exchange for Dunedin assuming responsibility for by mutual mowing and landscape maintenance along same portion of R/W. consent/ For Miles Creek from 58th St N to Joe's Creek Outfall -this is a 30-Year Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg ILA 03/16/82 03/16/22 agreement that initially sets the terms for improvement by the City with the Facilities 0 County responsible for 50 /o of the construction costs and up to 30 years of ongoing maintenance responsibility Defines assignment of shared city and county maintained responsibilities along Transportation pinellas County St Petersburg ILA 01/06/83 No expiration 77th Avenue Canal (aka Sawgrass Lake Outfall) between the east R/W line of I- Facilities date 275 to 80th Ave N Various terms o termination Transportation East Lake mentioned. Sets the terms and conditions for East Lake Woodlands, Ltd., to lease roadways Facilities pinellas County Woodlands Ltd. Lease 12/01/81 Lease is to secure them from public usage and assigns maintenance burden to lessee. otherwise a perpetual agreement Sets the terms and conditions for Belleau Beach to perform certain Transportation Pinellas County Belleau Beach ILA 05/21/02 05/21/05 maintenance operations, including mowing, grading and litter pickup, along Facilities Belleau Cswy, aka CR 416 Permit provides for the City to mow and edge grass within roadway medians at: Transportation No expiration Belcher Rd from Ulmerton Rd to Kent Pl; and Keene Rd from E Bay Dr to Facilities pinellas County Largo Utility License 05/22/96 date Rosery Rd; and Starkey Rd from Ulmerton Rd to E Bay Dr; and Ridge Rd from Ulmerton Rd to W Bay Dr Sets the terms and condition which allows Pinellas Park to landscape and Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park Agreement 02/26/81 No expiration maintain mowing and plantings along 49th St N from 62nd Ave N to 102nd Facilities date Ave N ~ Type oC Eftectlve Date o[ Expiration Dat Service Party 1 Party z Description/Not6s Agreement . Agreement of Agreement Transportation Pinellas County Seminole JPA 10/03/75 N/A Allows the City to landscape and maintain that portion of 113th St N north Facilities within Seminole C/L's. Allows the City to landscape 9th St N north of 118th Ave N to FDOT right of Transportation pinellas County St Petersburg Utility License 08/18/92 N/A way. Stipulates a maintenance agreement must be enacted for the City to Facilities perform maintenance and mowing. Allows the City to landscape 54th Ave N bet 22nd St N and 4th St N. Transportation pinellas County St Petersburg Utility License 03/26/93 N/A Stipulates a maintenance agreement must be enacted for the City to perform Facilities maintenance and mowing Allows the City to landscape 62nd Ave N bet 28th St N and 12th St N, and Transportation pinellas County St Petersburg Utility License 03/26/93 N/A 38th Ave N bet 58th St and 55th St N. Stipulates a maintenance agreement Facilities must be enacted for the City to perform maintenance and mowing. Transportation pinellas County Belleau Beach ILA 10/01/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Belleau Bluffs ILA 10/01/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Dunedin ILA 10/O1/01 09/30/06 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Gulfport ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation Pinellas County Indian Rocks ILA 10/01/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Beach Transportation pinellas County Indian Shores ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Largo ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Madeira Beach [LA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signa] equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Redington Beach ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Safety Harbor ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Seminole [LA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County South Pasadena ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County St Pete Beach ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Transportation pinellas County Tarpon Springs ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Service Party Y Party 2 Type'of N [festive Date of Expiration Dat bescr•iption/Notes Agreement Agreement. of Agreement Transportation pinellas County Treasure Lsland ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Facilities Crescent Oaks Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain signs and other traffic Transportation Community Traffic Law control devices along private roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas Facilities Pinellas County Association, Enforcement Pending Pending County Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one-year, Pinellas County Agreement Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal agreement each year. Sheriffs Office East Lake Woodlands Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain signs and other traffic Transportation Community Traffic Law control devices along private roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas Facilities Pinellas County Association, Enforcement 10/01/03 09/30/04 County Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one-year, Pinellas County Agreement Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal agreement each year. Sheriffs Office Sets the temu and conditions for the County to maintain signs and other traffic Transportation Forest Ridge Traffic Law control devices along private roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas Facilities Pinellas County Homeowner's Enforcement 10/01/03 09/30/04 County Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one-year, Association Agreement Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal agreement each year. President's Landing Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain signs and other traffic Transportation Homeowner's Traffic Law control devices along private roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas Facilities pinellas County Association, Enforcement 10/01/03 09/30/04 County Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one-year, Pinellas County Agreement Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal agreement each year. Sheriffs Office The lease may Transportation be cancelled by Sets terms and conditions for the City to lease part of the Belleair Cswy R/W as Facilities pinellas County Belleair Bluffs Lease 06/25/74 p rty either a a Park. given F Planning Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (1/14/92 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 7/6/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (2/21/95 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 8/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (9/13/99 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Safety Harbor ILA 7/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (3/24/92 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Largo ILA 10/23/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas County Tarpon S rings ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (10/10/89 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA N/A 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. 9/30/01 plus 1 year provides expression ofinter-agency cooperation and defines the Pinellas Park Planning Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 10/23/00 automatic planning Area. renewals through 9/30/10 Planning Pinellas County Madeira Beach N/A 2/1/02 N/A American Assembly Service Party 1 - Party2 T e of, yP .Effective Date of Expiration Dat Description/Notes Agreement Agreement of Agreement automatic renewals in successive 3 Planning Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 5/4/93 year periods Cooperation Agreement Community Development Block Grant unless County or City provides written notice Reestablishes each party's sewer service area and establishes Belleau Road as Planning Largo Clearwater ILA 4/18/2000 N/A the annexation boundary Planning Pinellas County Largo and Pinellas ILA 7/11/2000 N/A Establishes annexation boundary lines between Pinellas Park and Largo park Provides that County-owned land voluntarily annexed into Pinellas Park retains Planning Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA N/A N/A the right to develop through County permitting process and existing County zoning. Provides that County-owned land voluntarily annexed into Largo retains [he Planning Pinellas County Largo ILA 9/27/1999 N/A right to develop through County permitting process and existing County zoning. LEGEND N/A =Data Not Provided ILA = Interlocal Agreement LOU = Letter of Understanding MOU =Memo of Understanding MOA =Memo of Agreement UPLICATION OF SERVICES Table 5 identifies those duplications in services and facilities identified by individual reporting entities. The City of Safety Harbor is the only municipality that identified any duplications. A duplication is considered to occur when more than one service provider provides the same service or facility to a customer (e.g., for example, duplication may occur if geographic service areas overlap). TABLE 5 Duplication of Services and Facilities Identified by: CITY OF SAFETY HARBOR SERVICE AGREEMENT NUMBER ENTITIES DUPLICATION POTENTIAL STRATEGIES COMMENTS Parks and None Safety Facility Renegotiate Safety Harbor Recreation Harbor, Agreement Community Center Center was Foundation, recently Clearwater enlarged SERVICE DELIVERY DEFICIENCIE Table 6 identifies deficiencies in services, by type of service, as identified by individual reporting entity. A service delivery deficiency is generally represented by a gap in service delivery. For example, if a certain geographic area is not within the service area of any local government or district for one of the 8 identified services, then a service delivery gap may be evident, or where service delivery is not considered to be adequate, a deficiency may exist. The City of Dunedin and the City of Safety Harbor identified the following deficiencies. No other deficiencies were identified by the County, a Municipality or a Special District. 30 TABLE 6: Identified Gaps or Deficiencies in Service Delivery Deficiency identified bv: CITY OF DUNEDIN From City of Dunedin/Solid Waste Division.• "The issue I have with the current interlocal between the City and the County is that it basically is an unfunded mandate upon the City. Since the State eliminated grant funding for recycling, the Cities are still required to operate recycling programs and report the result to the County, however the cities receive no financial assistance to operate these programs. Without the cities continuing recycling programs, the County would not come close to meeting the State goal of 30 percent recycling rate. " The County replaced the grant funding it lost with tipping fees received at the waste to energy facility, in order to fund recycling programs in the unincorporated areas of the County. Most of the tipping fees are paid by municipalities within the County. However the County has not made any funding available to the Cities to help cover the coats of the recycling programs we are bound to operate due to the interlocal agreement. " Gans in Service Delivery Identified bv: CITY OF SAFETY HARBOR SERVICE AGREEMENT ENTITIES GAP STANDARD STRATEGY COMMENTS NUMBER Sanitary None Safety Har- Treatment Population Renegotiate Based upon Sewer bor, Capacity agreement buildout Clearwater projections, too much treatment capacity is reserved Sanitary None Safety Collection Septic systems Annexation Unincorporated Sewer Harbor, agreement enclaves in Pinellas service area are Coun not served Sanitary None Safety Collection Septic systems Capital Unnerved areas in Sewer Harbor, improvement service area Pinellas Coun Drainage None Safety Drainage Capital Cooperative Recommended Harbor, Improve- projects funding projects in Safety Clearwater, ments Harbor are not Pinellas funded Coun Transportation None Safety Project In- Agreement Complete Sidewalks at Facilities Harbor, complete project CSX RR crossing Pinellas not completed by Coun Coun Parks and None Safety Facility Swimming Renegotiate Potential gap in Recreation Harbor, pool agreement programs Clearwater, associated with Long Center the Long Center Foundation swimmin ool 31 GREEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE UPDATED Table 4, the Inventory of Agreements, identifies agreements that have expired but are still relevant. If updates are required, it is described as such in the individual notes associated with the specific agreement. In addition, Table 7 below is provided by the City of Safety Harbor. TABLE 7 Agreements that Need to be Updated -City of Safety Harbor ENTITIES AGREEMENT SERVICE ACTION COMMENTS NUMBER REQUIRED Safety Harbor, None Sanitary Sewer Update existing Renegotiate Clearwater agreement treatment capacity at NE Regional Facility based on buildout ro'ections Safety Harbor, None Parks and Renegotiate Potential Clearwater, Long Recreation existing agreement duplication of Center Foundation facilities now that City community center ex anded Safety Harbor, None Solid Waste Review Service Expires in 2004, Waste Delivery Options review cost to Management provide in-house vs. contract OVERALL STRATEGIES TO HELP ELIMINATE DEFICIENCIES/ GAPS OR DUPLICATION IN SERVICE DELIVERY The following strategies will help facilitate solutions to identified deficiencies, duplication or gaps in service delivery. Utilize the results of the Pinellas Assembly process, implementing those recommendations that are agreed to by the Municipalities and the County. Utilize the upcoming local government preparation of Evaluation and Appraisal Reports and associated updates to comprehensive plans as a process for coordination, which will include updates to Intergovernmental Coordination Elements and Infrastructure-related Elements. 32 PINELLAS ASSEMBLY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR... Public Safety -the Fire/Emergency Medical Services Structures and Financing Report and the Law Enforcement Structures and Financing Report Recreation Structures and Financing Report Transportation Integration Report 33 l~ r~urox tm 1 ~.~~~ ~ +~ i ~ 4J n ~ON~PR1NpS i .cnnlNtN ~ I o ~ wclyly Nm..e~.. 0 • A q ~~ ~ WnI M gyb6 / 0 V O / .. '.z-' - I~ o q w 'UUee11AV ~ ~r~~ L_ / ~ ~ lwl~4 Gulf - ~ ° , h ./~~ Mexico ~ ~ "°°`'0', °~ ~ ~14!~ ~ ~ ~OT~hpett . ~ ~ _ ; ~~ HARSOR ~ry'~ ~ • -~ ~_r: ~~~r i "~ ~~{ ' ~ _ ~ _- - - ~a e ! ~~ :a ~ ,.. ~~!1 ~~~- -'~ ~" .i' ell em 4~ ~ CLE~ARWATER l~~ ~`~~ r -• - L r l I - _ ola. v ` W '_.~_ awrntnc m ~ , ~ --`( sew ~upetr . Iwv ro u mao - ~ I ~; ~ 4; cousme+l ~J1O p~p) ,~ I ` ~~ , v ~N BEACH ~'9 ~'Si C - __ _ ~ - - BELLEAIR ~ i ...~ ntz w - ' ~ ~- 't„ ~ rd SHORE ? LAROO' - i _ - ~ INDUN R --- ~ ~ "- - -n-~ N ~ ; _ , _ _ -- : _ - ol,~eN e~ ~,r. ,E° BEACH i _ -1, _ ~ / . - - ~ .- ; - - -- . -- iNe t K ~ -~. ` _ M1DU1N ~ ~ -d Cl PINELLASP - ~ 7 --`fl BHOREB ~ ~,.. uro ~ i ,~ }`_ F=~' k~ ~ /~~3 ,, r- ;~rG ~,~ _- O I tmo .,. N. _ _,_ BHDREB i~ e.n an n. ~ ' - , nn to N. 4 ;. ~ - ~ ~.,„ NORTH REDINQTON ;KEIIINCfH I i ' ~ I ~aQY F ' B~~ ~ um un .ve n. - CIN - - I .ere .ve n. i ~ ~I I ~ BEACH --- ~ -~ _ ---, REDINOTON ~ _ - `-`so<e~erx ----- --r Cim:oiNr" ' --- ---= i 5-I GI ti MADEIRA BEACH ~ .e ~ 1~ ~ • x ~ t I~ ~-Q~ ~ ~ I . P I RS URQ j `'~lU"' ~ ~~, ~ ~ <' `~~` r ccrtnt n ,.--~ L - - ~ I ~ 1-n. _/ .. TREASURE ISLAND ~ --~-----• ' " ~ -~ DULFPORT~ r ,, " FIGURE 5 ~~' LAW ENFOPCEMENT ST. PETEBEACHl '~ ~~ L- PINELLAS COUNTY `~~ ~' 2, `_.` ~' JANUARY 2004 PROVIDED BY PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF (UNINCORPORATED AREA) ~ PROVIDED BY PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF ~~ ~ o THROUGH MUNICIPAL CONTRACTS , Q ° E 1. Law enforcement provided by respective municipal ~ 0 police departments. '~ ~. Belleair Shore contracts with Belleair Beach for law enforcement services. :3. Redington Shores contracts with Indian Shores for law enforcement services. PLANNING ~. ~v.o.. ~...~,~. ,.,.....,.~.. „.. ,.~..,.. we..,... ol.,a~..m.,e .-..~.,__.,1... ..~..~.. ,.,..._..~,. N ........ ~:.w:~' a: ,~.~.W ~. .~...~ m > w. e.d.w vw.ro e~...w ~ FW } `Y, ~ ~. F ~ - ~ ~ ` y :s'yt -~P ~fe,I ':r w': 4~° d 1 ~;. ~ .u ~ W 1 1 TASK forces' REPORT summary Presented January 9, 2004 T r U 1 1 f ~ ,;~ ~~ '" ~ ~ k f ~, ~f [ Y _ ~ r:e e ~.. ~~" ~ ti F „r;r ANNEXATION [~ [- 1 1 y POLICY/GUIDELINES TASK FORCE members: Ed Armstrong -Chairman Roger Sellew -Vice Chairman Dan Massaro James S. Miles* Judy Mitchell Ray Neri Grady Pridgen David Stone Staff SuRpo rt Jake Stowers Asst. County Administrator Pinellas County Michael Gustafson City Manager City of Pinellas Park *Deceased I. VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION Issue Objective Recommendation Process I o Implement A. PlanninglAnnexationAress To Esfabhsh Areas Eligible For Restore Planning/Annexation Areas Ordinance Ached On By PPC/CPA Annexation And, Conversely As Originally Established Under Effective Jan. 1, 2005 Freezing Planning Those Reserved For Ordinance No. 003 Area Boundaries Until Jan. 1, 2008, Or Unincorporated Status Earlier To Coincide w/Effective Date Of Referendum Process' B. Criteria For planning I Ta Clarify And Refine Basis Prepare Revisions That Address Orcllnance Acted On By PPC I CPA Annexation Area Boundary Far Future boundary Public /Community Interests and Correspondent w/Ordinance Freezing Amendment Amendments Fiscal impacts Planning Area Boundaries, To Be Effective Jan. 1, 2008, Or Earlier Ta Coincide w/Effective Date Of Referendum Process' C. Process Fvr Planning J To Clarify Who Can Initiate Clarify That the County Or A Ordinance Acted On By PPC/CPA Annexation Area Boundary And To Assure Objectivity w/ Municipality May Initiate Boundary Correspondent wlOrdinance Freezing Amendment Fnal Decision Amendment; Provide For Super- PEannmg Area Boundarles,To Be Effective Majority Vote Of CPR To Override Jan. 1, 2008 Or Earlier Ta Coincide PPC Recommendation; And wlEffective Date Of Referendum Process' Provide For Chapter 120 F.S. Adminlstratlve Hearing Process Notes: 1. a.) All three actions (A. B. 8~ C.) to amend Ordinance No. 00-63 to be treated as a package -all or nothing -with staggered effective dates that may be advanced to correspond w/legislative action and charter amendment processes. b.} Proposed freeze on planning area/annexation boundaries would not preclude amendment post Jan. 1, 2005 by action of PpC/CPA based on voluntary annexation request of property owner or by mutual agreement of County and affected municipalityties}: 2. In recognition of existing Iftigation challenging current voluntary annexation process, it is recommended that said litigation be stayed pending the implementation of the recommendations contained herein I!. REFERENDUM ANNEXATION Issue Ob ective Recommendation Process To Im lement ~Islation To Establish Exclusive Limes Referendum Annexations To Amend Chapter 171. F.S. To Enable Countywide Procedures To Existing Planning Areas And Seek Home Rule Charter Counties To Adopt Govem Referendums Legislative Support To Amend Exdusive Process Thru Charber Gen'I. Law Amendment B. Establish Exdusive Countywide To Establish More Equitable Identify Specific Requirements As Amend County Charter to Enable Process Process Requirements And Procedures Part Of Charter Amendment Effective Jan 1, 2008, Or Earlier Based For Areas To Be Annexed (Eg. Process On Legislative Authonzation 70/30. RUIe C. Identify Areas To Be Eligible For To Establish Certainity And Identify In Map Arid Ordinance Adopt Ordinance Through PPC/CPA Annexation By Referendum Predictability Regarding Areas Form The Areas To Be Governed in Process Efiect~ve Correspondent w! Eligible For Annexation By Advance Of Charter Amendment CharterArnendment Effective Jan 1, Referendum Consistent w/ 2008, Or Earlier Based 4n Legislative Established Planning ! Authorization Annexation Areas 2 - -~ -- Ill. Enclaves Ica~~o OhiPrtive Recommendation Process.To Implement A. Internal Enclaves (Completely To Eliminate In The Interest Of All Infernal Enclaves Be Required Support Proposed State Legislation Surrounded By The Same More Efficient And Logical To Be Annexed By Jan. 1, 2008. Providing For Same, Or Include Enabling Municipality) Municipal Boundaries Any Costs Directly Inadent To Provision In Amendment Of Chapter 171, Annexation Of Enclaves {Other F.S Than Changed Ad Valorem Tax, Utility Tax and Franchise Fees} To Be Borne The Munici al' B. Unincorporated Areas 1Nrthin To Encourage Their Support Pro Actrve Measures To Joint City-County Effort To Facilitate Municipal P{anning Area Annexation Thru Voluntary Or Incept Annexation Where Annexation Wherever Achievable, Based Between Planning Area Referendum Process So As Annexation Is Not Achievable, Upon Efficient And Effective Delivery Of Boundary & Municipal Boundary To Fill-In Exterior Boundaries Encourage Interlocal Agreement Urban Services On A Prioritized, Systematic For Service Delivery Between The Basis. In The Alternative, County And Respective Municipality Encourage Interlocal Agreement To Provide Efficient And Effective Service 3 1V. OVERALL PRINCIPLES Issue Objective Recommendation Process To Implement A. Properties Of Countywide To Treat These Properties As Speclflcally Provide For Annexation Identify Specific List Of Such Properties Signifcance For All Others And Provide For Where The Property 1 Facility Is To Be Developed And agreed to Their lnoorporation Where It Is Within An Established Planning / wlRespective Jurisdictions -Target Daie Logical To Do So Annexation Area, While Protecting Of Jan. '[, 2008; And Establish A Uniform The Fiscal, Regulatory And Master Interlocal Agreement That Can Be Operational Prerogatives Of The Customized To Individual Properties That Responsible Countywide Entity is Satisfactory To The County To Protect Sts Proprietary Interest While Allowing For Annexation -Target Date Of Jan. 1, 2008 B. Incentives/Inducements For Provide Only Those Incentives Develop Guidelines Consistent With Consider Amendment Of Voluntary And Annexation That Have A Clear Public The Statutory /Constitutional Referendum Annexation Procedures To Purpose Related To Parameters To Assist In Defining Add Definitions /Criteria Regarding Broad Infrastructure And Providing Public Purpose Public Purpose -Target Date of Jan. 1, No Exclusiva Private Benefit 2008 Or Public Subsid C. Public Participation and Encourage The Preparation Utilize Public Forums To Encourage Encourage Greater City-County Information And Distribution Of Objective, Public Input On Annexation-Related Collaboration On The Production, Policy Neutral Information To Matters Distribution And Public Presentations Of The Public Concerning Annexation Matfers Annexation And Participation BY The Public With Annexation Decisions D. Service Delivery Generally The Most Efficient And Encourage The Review And Consider And Implement The Effective Delivery Of Urban Determination Of The Most Efficient Recommendation From The Related Task Services, Including Fire, Law Means Of Service Delivery As A Forces Of The Pinellas Assembly Process Enforcement, Recreation, Corollary Or Alternative To Dealing With These Specific Issues Roadways, Drainage, Refuse Annexation Policy Collection, Sewer And Water Etc. __ - ,.._. ISSUE ~~]IQCfIVP_ RPCnmmcanrilat<inn Prnr~occ Tn Imniomnn* E. Transfer Of Jurisdictional To Establish Clear And Develop And Consumate A Master Continue The Process initiated By The Responsibilities Upon Equitable Responsibility For Interlocal Agreement Between The County And Reach Agreement With The Annexation Maintaining Certain Facilities County Or Any Special District And Cities Collectively Under An Intertoc~l And Operations Upon The Muniapalfies With The Agreement. Perhaps Add Requirement To Annexation Potential To Annex That Spells Out The Volun#ary And Referendum Both The Timing And Annexation processes Responsibilities For Such Things As Drainage, Highway Maintenance, Traffic Operations, Sewer, Water, Recreaton Etc., As Appropriate 5 1~ 1~ 11 r Dissenting. Opinion LeaJ.man B oundary Line Movement Recommendation Ray Neri Annexation Task Force Committee Member December 8, 2003 i J To: Council of Mayors and the Board of County Commissioners From: Ray Neri, Annexation Task Force Committee Member Subject: Dissenting Opinion The Annexation Task Force has com Ieted its work and is forwardin its recommendations for p g consideration. My fellow committee members did an adnural job of weighing the many difficult issues of contention that annexation has wrought. As you are all well aware, annexation has been an extremely complex issue because of its profound impact on city and county tax bases and a host of other issues to numerous to list. I would like to commend our chairman, Mr. Ed Armstrong, for his leadership and the thoughtfulness and wisdom demonstrated by my fellow ~, committee members. I feel fortunate to have been given the privilege of serving as a member on this panel of such remarkable people. ~~ The recommendations you wiU be receiving from the Annexation Task Force Committee has the unanimous approval of the entire committee with the exception of one recommendation. The .._ exception is to the recommendation that the Lealman annexation lines be moved back to their ' original positions. It is this recommendation with which I strongly disagree and take issue with _ and is the reason for my dissenting opinion. During our task force sessions, representatives from several cities attended and provided our r committee with invaluable input and insight on their positions on the subject of annexation. Mr. Stanton from Largo, Mr. EIy from Seminole and Mr. Healy from the PPC, attended most of the Annexation Task Force meetings and were strong advocates for their position on the annexation issue. After much discussion it was brought to our attention by city representatives that the main underlying issue with the Leahnan line movement was one of a violation of trust by the county. It is precisely this declaration and the recommendation that the Leahnan lines be restored to their ~, original position with which I take issue. T believe that OOb3 was not an ordinance carved in ' stone but rather a framework by which voluntary annexation disputes could be resolved and with which the CPA retained authority to make adjustments for inequities not foreseen by the placement of the voluntary annexation lines. Lealman's request for relief was brought before the BCC, the PPC and finally the CPA, who decided by a 5 to 1 vote that the oversight of the line placement in Leahnan needed to be corrected. I felt then, as I feel today, the CPA made the correct and courageous decision and motivated solely to do the right thing. They acted to correct an oversight which created an unforeseen burden on the residents of Lealman. How this action became a breach of trust in the minds of some I still do not understand and possibly, never will. Surely any city or the residents of any community outside a city's boundary, should have the same expectation of an equitable resolution of an unforeseen hardship created by a county ordinance regardless of the good intent \~; of that ordinance. The decision of the CPA was consistent with other similar decisions they have made. ~` Had the same "trust" argument been applied to the Dome issue, for example, St. Petersburg's residents would have been saddled with an addirional tax burden that was not foreseeable when the residents of St. Petersburg voted for the bond issue to build the stadium. The county did the right thing and offered relief by assuming ownership of the Dome thereby eliminating that 1 r U unforeseen tax obligation imposed by a court decision. The County Commissioners arrived at their decision because it was the right thing to do. In Lealman's case it was the annexation lines established by 0063 which substantially cut into Lealman's Independent Fire District's tax base and any subsequent annexations resulting from the placement of those lines would severely unpact the residents of the fire district with a larger tax burden. I do not see the difference in the relief Saint Petersburg sought from the county than that which "~ the residents of Lealman sought. In both situations a past action brought about an unforeseen . result. In both cases the unforeseen result adversely affected residents and in both cases the county saw fit to step in to do the right thing. It simply is not acceptable or equitable for an issue i of "trust" to be raised when the county has demonstrated and has applied a rational of fairness to ~ residents both inside and outside the boundaries of a city. I believe the residents of the unincorporated area have become more resistant to annexation precisely because of polarizing issues like this. I believe the major reasons for the increasing desire of residents to remain in the unincorporated area is the result of the complete urbanization ~- ' of the county in general, county government effectively addressing the needs and concerns of its ~ ~ residents, both within and out of cities, and the underestimated strong sense of community that - exists in many parts of the unincorporated area. This strong sense of community and resistance to annexation has been demonstrated many times over the past several months. Cove Cay rejected Largo's annexation attempt even though Largo was willing to spend city funds to affect the annexation. Five separate referendum actions by Seminole have recently been rejected, even with ', the promise of lower taxes and more services. The Wrens Way community, when given the opportunity to vote, opted not to be annexed only to have their will overthrown by the imposition of sewer indentures. A county survey mailed to residents in northwest Lealman, in mid 2003, resulted in an overwhelming rejection of being included in Pinellas Park's annexation planning area. Other communities abutting the northwest portion of Lealman, which were in Pinellas Park's planning area, had requested to be removed from Pinellas Park's planning area an order to remain in the unincorporated area. The people are speaking, they only need to be heard. ~~, While I personally had difficulty supporting the absorption of internal enclaves because of my strong personal belief in property rights, the arguments brought forth by both city and county representatives, outlining the difficulties of providing efficient services and the challenge of being able to be responsive to health and welfare issues, persuaded me to change my position. The arguments were compelling and I, along with my fellow committee members, voted for the absorption of enclaves because it was the right thing to do. It is my hope that both the Board of County Commissioners and the Council of Mayors will ', support the permanency of the Lealman boundary line movement. The Pane movement was the right thing to do then and is still the right thing today and should not be the focus of a "trust" issue which may overshadow the committee's other reconunendations. All I ask is that fairness guide you in making your decision. f [1 D r 1 ~; i I l 1 w 1 ~~ ~ _. , ~~ - - ;,~ ..~ . , ~ - ..., x ..€` .~~' _F ...F n _ > i r ~ ~ x ~ t r i'a ~. F ~~ ~ ~ (~~~ ~ ~' fi City/County MSTU TASK force MEMBERS: R. Dick Holmes -Chairman Carlton Ward -Vice Chairman Beverly Billiris Wayne Darnell John Doran Bill Heller Sallie Parks Randy Wedding Staff s~R o r : Mark Woodard Asst. County Administrator Pinellas County DRAFT Maureen (Mo) Freaney Asst. City Manager City of Dunedin 1 1 CITY/COUNTY MSTU DIVISION OF COST AND RECOVERY TASK FORCE Name of Task Force City/County MSTU (Municipal Services Taxing Unit) Division of Cost and Recovery Task Force ~~ Issue Statement Perform a base line analysis of the Municipal Services Taxing Unit including a history of how and why allocations have been done a particular way between unincorporated residents and Countywide residents. Apply a "reasonableness" standard to these allocation methodologies. Although legal factors have merit, the primary goal is the ultimate achievement of reasonableness and equity. Task Force Objectives 1. Review perceived inequities in the assignment of taxes and fees across Pinellas County jurisdictions. 2. Review equity in the distribution of revenues and services across all jurisdictions. 3. Review perceived belief that services in the unincorporated areas are being subsidized by Countywide taxes. 4. Review perceived belief that unincorporated areas and non-residents may benefit from City services without having to pay for those services. Task Force Members Chairman Dick Holmes -South Pasadena Vice Chairman Carlton Ward -Clearwater Beverley Billiris -Tarpon Springs Wayne Darnell -Largo John Doran -Clearwater Bill Heller - St. Petersburg Sallie Parks -Palm Harbor Randy Wedding - St. Petersburg Maureen Freaney (City Rep.) -Assistant City Manager -Dunedin Mark Woodard (County Rep.) -Assistant County Administrator -Pinellas County 1 r Facts The issue surrounding the Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) in Pinellas County has been on going since the mid-1970's. The legal basis for the debate between cities and counties throughout the state had its origin in the 1968 revision to the Florida Constitution that created the "dual taxation" issue. During the American Assembly process in May 2002 this was again at the forefront of key issues between cities and the County. The MSTU Task Force was established as one of seven Countywide Task Forces. The Task Force met 10 times from June 4 to November 12, 2003. The MSTU is a financial tool to capture public expenditures that exclusively benefit the unincorporated area (that portion of the County not located within a City). These expenditures are then converted to taxes (i.e. property taxes) and fees that are imposed within the unincorporated area at a level necessary to support the expenditures. Property taxes, which constitute 58% of the MSTU's revenues, are the most important and are generally looked upon as the key comparative measure. For this reason, the MSTU Task Force focused on services supported by property taxes and did not review those supported by earmarked revenues like the Gas Tax and Penny for Pinellas. The total Pinellas County population is approximately 921,000. The MSTU or unincorporated area encompasses 34.3% of the total County population, 40.2% of the total land mass and about 28% of the total taxable value. Although spread throughout the County, this makes the MSTU area the largest municipal service area in the County. The balance of population, land mass and taxable value is within the 24 Pinellas County cities. In September 1975, the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners addressed the issue of "dual taxation" by voting to establish an MSTU to fund municipal services rendered exclusively within the unincorporated area. The MSTU Property Tax rate (millage) referenced earlier is essentially the equivalent of a city millage. The creation of the MSTU was challenged, but upheld by the Circuit Court in December 1975 and upon appeal to the Florida Supreme Court in 1978. Having severed the "Gordian knot of prolific legalese" as characterized by the Circuit Court's Final Judgment, issues remain even today in the identification and allocation of costs. Unlike a city, which focuses solely on municipal services, the County operates at two levels. First, it delivers a wide array of Countywide services that meet a public need regardless of political jurisdiction. These services are funded in large part through a Countywide property tax imposed throughout all of Pinellas County. Second, it is the provider of municipal services in the unincorporated area (MSTU) which are funded primarily by a property tax imposed only in the unincorporated area. In many cases, these services are separate. For example, activities including Animal Services, Mosquito Control, 911 Emergency Communications, Courts, Jail and Human Services are delivered County- wide and have no MSTU nor municipal counterpart. Sometimes, however, the same personnel, equipment and other resources that are used for Countywide services are also used to deliver MSTU services. The mowing of Rights-of-Way and the maintenance of drainage facilities (ditches) associated with roads are good examples of this. The same crew that is attending to an arterial road (a County-wide responsibility) may later in the day clear a blockage in a ditch on a local street (an MSTU responsibility). Allocating these costs can be difficult and subject to some discretion 2 and a variety of assumptions, but this is the nature of cost allocation. Additionally, as a result of economies of scale, the County may be able to deliver some services at lower _ unit costs than cities. The degree of legitimate economies of scale versus true cost of services is clearly at the heart of the debate on whether the County is subsidizing the. delivery of services within the unincorporated area (MSTU), and thereby keeping its property tax rate artificially low by either improperly allocating County-wide revenues to the MSTU or allocating a disproportionate share of MSTU costs to the County-wide taxpayer. The goal of the Task Force was to review the facts surrounding the MSTU and to test the "reasonableness" of the MSTU cost allocation methodologies utilized by the County. Sound fiscal management and public policy further supported this goal. After the establishment of the MSTU in 1975, the County developed an administrative ''~ procedure to use annually during the budget development process to identify and ' allocate revenues and expenses to the MSTU. This process culminates every year in the computation of the millage rate to be imposed in the MSTU. The process originally included four "offsets" that were intended to recognize that MSTU residents were paying both aCounty-wide as well as an MSTU millage rate to fund certain items and as such should get a "credit" on the MSTU millage rate that they pay. For example, the statutory fees and commissions due to the Property Appraiser's Office are not allocated to the cities and passed on to their residents through the municipal millage rate. Unincorporated residents, however, pay a portion of these costs through the various millages that are imposed upon them (i.e. MSTU, Fire, Library). The Property Appraiser "offset" had the effect of reducing the MSTU millage rate downward and increased the Countywide rate proportionally. The three other offsets were based upon a similar '~ philosophy and had the same effect on millages. The County employed this methodology to calculate the MSTU in a reasonably, \~ consistent fashion over the years. Specific revenues and expenditures would be added or deleted from time to time to reflect programmatic and operational changes. Starting in FY96, however, the County began to phase-out the offsets noted above. By FY02, all r four offsets had been eliminated. It was determined that these offsets could not be supported legally or with proper backup data. The removal of these "credits" increased the MSTU budget by about $4.9 million and increased the millage rate imposed on unincorporated residents accordingly. A review of the County's MSTU Budget shows that about 59% is related to services provided by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office (PCSO). The balance is related to other property tax funded county services delivered in the unincorporated area. The Task Force's review essentially followed this breakdown. The former, given its magnitude and the additional complexities of the 11 municipal law enforcement contracts that the PCSO provides, proved to be the most challenging and time consuming. Well in advance of the work of the Task Force, the PCSO engaged an outside consultant, Government Services Group, Inc. (GSG), to review the PCSO's allocation of costs to the MSTU and to determine if the municipal law enforcement, contracts were set at a level sufficient to recover the full cost of providing the service to the city. This engagement reflects the first comprehensive external review of the PCSO's cost. of services since the 1970's. The last limited external review of costs occurred in 1994 as part of the Dunedin law enforcement contract. In summary, GSG found that the M PCSO's law enforcement contracts had not kept up with inflation, principally the older ones, and thus should be adjusted upward to recover the full costs of providing services. Additionally, GSG reviewed the PCSO's overall operation and recommended that a "base level of service" charge be allocated to the Countywide budget in recognition of the Sheriff's constitutional and statutory responsibilities as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the County. Generally, the PCSO's Deputies have the power to issue citations and make arrests throughout the County, while municipal law enforcement officers generally limited to their respective cities. This base level of service (35.7% of the total Sheriff's budget) was computed by equally weighting the MSTU's proportional share of population and geographic area. These factors were used to approximate the minimum, or base level of service, that the PCSO provides to the County. This approximation was required because specific workload measures (i.e. services delivered in the MSTU vs a city are not always available or have not been compiled. Therefore, a minimum of 35.7% of all of the PCSO's costs of service would be assigned to the Countywide budget. A review of those benefiting from the PCSO's functions would then determine how the balance of expenses would be allocated. For example, the balance of the costs associated with the Detention, Corrections and Judicial Operations (i.e. between 35.7% and 100%) are allocated Countywide based upon the undisputed countywide benefit of a jail and court security. Conversely, the majority of the Patrol Operations function above the base level of service, after adjusting for workload, is allocated to the MSTU. Since few workload measures were available, GSG assumed a workload split of 27% in incorporated areas and 73% in unincorporated areas. This assumption was based upon their experience with other law enforcement agencies operating in similar environments. The GSG report included a model with specific inputs that can be used on an annual basis to recompute the portion of the PCSO budget that should be allocated to the MSTU. The concept of using unincorporated geographic area and population as variables to determine the "base level of service" is based on the fact that the "base level of service" would theoretically be 0% if all of the unincorporated area were annexed. As noted, the concept of a "base level of service" is complex and controversial. It was the most contentious and highly debated issue of the MSTU Task Force. The Task Force asked GSG to appear several times to present and explain their findings. The Sheriff also appeared before the Task Force several times to offer his perspective. The City Managers Consortium established a City Technical Team comprised primarily of municipal budget and finance staff to review the GSG Report and other MSTU issues. The City Technical Team challenged the validity of any justifiable base level of service. The Task Force engaged Chiefs from the municipal Police Departments (PD) in a roundtable forum to discuss the role of the PCSO vis-a-vis their departments. Without exception, the City PDs acknowledged the role and the benefit of the PCSO and the resources that it brings to the community. Many of the smaller PD's rely upon the PCSO to handle narcotics and homicide cases. Several PD's noted that but for the "backup" that the PCSO provides to their respective departments, they might otherwise need to hire additional city personnel. The larger departments, including St. Petersburg, Clearwater and Largo, are full service in nature and rely much less upon the services of the PCSO. The Sheriff pointed out several instances over the years where the PCSO has been a key resource to these larger departments including assistance in quelling civil unrest and the provision of SWAT and Bomb Squad resources. Despite the PDs' 4 1 support for the PCSO, they emphasized that they were not able to assess the reasonableness of the costs allocated to Countywide taxpayers related to the Sheriffs services. Many actually had questions as to what their citizens actually paid for the services provided by the PCSO through Countywide taxes. Conceptually, a "base level of service" model speaks not only to the actual services that are provided on an ongoing basis, but also the potential to provide thos e services when and if needed. The Task Force discussed the concept in the context of the "demand model" and the frequently cited example of electricity -when you flip the wall switch, you want the light to come on. The Task Force culminated its discussions on "base level of services" with the following listing of pros and cons, as well as alternative percentage allocation factors and their ~, impact. A. Base Level of Service (BLS) PRO CON ~'' ^ Sheriffs Constitutional Officer ^ Without a specific definition of what the responsibility and accountability. BLS is, only workload should be used o PCSO historically provided for the as base for cost allocation. original law enforcement of the County. ^ Not reasonable for approximately 53% Police Departments built up around it in some cases creating duplication. of law enforcement costs be borne by unincorporated residents when GSG Study shows 73% of direct benefits ^ Service Availability (Light Switch goes to unincorporated residents. Theory). " ^ Many services provided by Sheriff are ~ ^ Must be an overseer of the Big provided by cities-so cities must pay , Picture" regarding security for Pinellas twice. County. ^ Per capita comparisons show a lower ^ The Sheriffs Office is available to per capita for the MSTU and Sheriffs ~' every Pinellas resident 24 hours a day/7 days a week. contracts than for Municipal Police Departments. ^ If only workload figures were used and .the actual workload shrunk to a ^ Unless a better BLS proxy is determined, use of BLS should be minimum in incorporated areas, discontinued. Current proxy does not unincorporated residents could end up provide a clear rationale. ~~ subsidizing the Sheriffs Office for Constitutional, service availability and o If a 73/27% workload split were used, "big picture" obligations of the Sheriff. everyone would still contribute toward '~ the Sheriff's Statutory responsibilities. J r B. BLS - Alternative Allocation Percentage Methodologies calculated by GSG) MSTU COST 1. GSG Recommendation 37.22% _ $32,371,870 2. GSG Revised Populations Rec. 35.70% _ $33,152,570 3. Zero Base Level (Technical Team Rec.) 0.00% _ $51,488,732 4. Population Only 31.25% _ $35,438,170 5. Land Area Only 40.18% _ $30,851,561 6. Road Miles Only 39.44% _ $31,231,638 7. Assessed Property Value 29.30% _ $36,439,725 8. Just Property Values 28.81% _ $36,691,397 The formal City Technical Team Report on the matter disagreed with the entire concept of a base level of services. The Task Force indicated that measurable, verifiable workload factors would have been a better way to determine the base level of service. They concurred with GSG that these factors are not available at this time, and support the GSG report recommendations that the PCSO start to compile this data where practicable. The Task Force supported including the data in the model developed by GSG to calculate the MSTU portion of the PCSO budget. They discussed the inherent limitation of workload measures in some instances where the cost of compiling the statistics may exceed the benefit. For example, knowing the city in which a PCSO call for service or traffic citation is made with certainty may require that all cruisers be equipped with Global Positioning Systems hardware and Geographic Information Systems software - an expensive proposition. The Task Force did indicate that where workload measurement is impractical, some sampling methodologies should be utilized. In the end, although a majority of the Task Force was not comfortable with GSG's base level services calculation and in the absence of workload measures or a clear alternative, the Task Force did not recommend a change in the GSG methodology. Instead they determined that their work and conclusions should be forwarded to a recommended "Tax Equity Board" who would continually refine and evolve the base level amount over time and introduce workload measures where possible. The balance of the MSTU is comprised of non-PCSO functions. Some of these services are exclusive to the MSTU. The Building Inspection department is a good example as "but for" the MSTU, the department would not be needed. In other words, if there were no MSTU, there would be no Building Department. These functions, including Code Enforcement, because of their exclusivity to the unincorporated area are funded from the MSTU at 100%. There are some functions, however, that serve both a Countywide as well as an MSTU purpose. In these cases, workload measures are used to allocate costs to the MSTU. Costs associated with storm water facilities, as noted earlier, are allocated to the MSTU. This practice as started in FY03 reallocated about $3.9 million to the MSTU from the Countywide budget. County staff did meet with a sub-group of city managers in 2001 to review the allocation of non-PCSO costs as well as revenues. This further assisted the County in continuing to refine the allocation of costs to the MSTU. Additionally, workload measures have been reviewed resulting in more costs being allocated to the MSTU and indirect costs (overhead) have been allocated to the MSTU starting in FY03. The increase to the MSTU budget associated 6 with indirect costs is about $4.1 million. The County has also allocated costs associated with new municipal services in the unincorporated area (i.e. Recreation, Connection Centers, etc.) to the MSTU. The MSTU Task Force and the City Technical Team recognized and commended County staff for their recent efforts to ensure greater equity within the non-PCSO portion of the MSTU. In conclusion, the allocation of costs is a difficult task. The Task Force indicated the importance for continued communication between City, County and PCSO staff as the .~ equity of the MSTU is further refined. Findings 1. The allocation of costs between the MSTU and the Countywide budgets is a complex process based upon various assumptions. As such, there will always be room for debate regarding the methodology used and the results. No calculation will be perfect, therefore, a general standard of "reasonableness" must be applied. The duality of service provision by County government at the regional (countywide) and municipal (MSTU) level provides some unique cost allocation challenges. ~, 2. The PCSO's base level of service cost is the most contentious equity issue. The majority of the Task Force was not comfortable with the 35.7% base level services calculation. They felt equally uncomfortable in proposing an alternative at this time. It was felt a reliable alternative would need to evolve from better workload tracking and the on-going oversight of a Tax Equity Board. 3. The County has continually refined the non-PCSO MSTU adding costs previously allocated to the Countywide budget. The "offsets" that were established in the late 1970's providing a credit and thereby reducing the MSTU millage rate have been phased out. Additionally, starting in FY03, the MSTU has been charged for indirect costs (overhead) - $4.2 million in FY04. An allocation of $3.9 million was made to the MSTU for stormwater beginning in FY03 and $4.1 million was allocated for recreation initiatives through a direct increase in the MSTU millage in FY03. ^ 4. The sharing of information and communications are key components of the MSTU development process. The City Technical Team and County Staff can play an important role in maintaining this dialogue. 5. Where improved workload trackin is not ractical, random sam lin 9 P P 9 methodologies should be utilized. 6. Consideration should be given for oversight of periodic allocation reviews by an independent agency to eliminate any perception of impropriety. 1 1 ' Task Force Recommendations 1. A Tax Equity Board shall be created. It should be charged to review, on a three- year basis, the cost/benefit ratio submitted by the County Budget Department and determine a fair distribution of the tax load for the services provided. Support for the Board's efforts would come from an ad-hoc staff, evolving from the technical committee utilized by the Task Force, made up of representatives from the budgetary departments of the cities and the County Budget Director. The Board's recommendations would be forwarded to the County Commission for endorsement and adoption during the normal budget cycle each year. 2. Through cooperation of the County and the cities, staff management teams should be developed to review the following remaining equity issues and provide reports on the various areas to the County Commission and the Mayors' Council: ^ Water/Sewer Surcharge (25%) for unincorporated residents within municipal service areas. ^ Fire District revenue allocation to cities. o Pinellas County Library Cooperative revenue allocation to cities. ^ The one-half cent sales tax revenue allocation. 3. County staff should recommend and Board of County Commissioners should approve a more definitive Fund Balance policy for the MSTU. 4. County staff and the Pinellas County Sheriffs Office will review the MSTU allocation methodology with the city managers annually. Attachments to Final Report: (Available upon request) 1. Summary Minutes (In Date Order) 2. May 2003 GSG Report 3. 9/23/03 City Technical Team Report -Sheriffs MSTU Cost Allocation Study 4. 10/27/03 GSG Response to 9/23/03 City Technical Team Report 5. 9/18/03 Non-PCSO MSTU Allocation Information Prepared by County Staff Representative Mark Woodard 6. 10/27/03 City Technical Team Report -MSTU Revenue and Cost Allocations (Non-PCSO) 7. Other Miscellaneous Resource Materials in Chronological Order 8 A 1 r t r 1 1 ~_ ~; ~,, ~~ #_ a r ,.._. ~ ~ - -- f ~~~ 1~ ~ r aF ~ f£ ~, -,= Fire/emergency med ica I services structures & Financing TASK f o r c e Members: Ed Hooper -Chairman Joe Calio Sally Foote Michael Godich Sally Israel Jerry Knight Kathleen Litton Tim Schuler Staff SuRpo rt: Gay Lancaster Chief Asst. County Administrator Pinellas County James Callahan Fire Chief St. Petersburg Fire Department Pinellas Assembly EMS/Fire Task Force Report Executive Summary ,r December 18, 2003 '~ Task Force Name EMS /Fire Task Force Issue statement/Task Force Charge Conduct a study of the fire services countywide to assess levels of services, cost, the distribution l~. of cost and services, and related factors. The task force should evaluate the potential for savings, improved services, and more equitable assignment of cost from consolidating districts, having cities serve parts of the unincorporated areas, and/or combining the city and county units into a ~, single countywide fire protection system with uniform salary and benefit scales. If full consolidation is recommended, the task force should propose an approach and time-line for phasing it in. The task force should study EMS and evaluate whether cost might be lowered and/or performance improved by combining EMS with partially or fully consolidated fire protection services. The Task Force Chair met with the City and County representatives on Friday, September 19, to outline the committee's future agenda to ensure completion by the target month of January. An agenda was distributed separating the task force mandate down into four major components: A. Savings (Consolidation and/or Regionalization, Joint Purchasing of Insurance and Other Commodities) B. Service Improvement (ISO Rating, Fire and Life Safety Codes, Hydrants and Infrastructure) C. Equitable Assignment of Costs (Fees, Tax Equity, Specialty Team Support) D. EMS Transport Task Force Objectives ~ To provide integrated, high quality efficient and cost-effective fire protection and emergency medical services throughout Pinellas County by fairly compensated and well- trained personnel with due regard for the safety of the community and service providers through enactment and enforcement of uniform codes and paid for by as uniform a method of collection as possible bX ~, all consumers of services. A. Savings 1. Consolidation and/or Regionalization -Evaluate the potential for savings, improved services, and more equitable allocation of cost by consolidating districts, having cities serve parts of the unincorporated areas, and combining fire service agencies into a single countywide fire protection system with uniform salary and benefit scales. The task force should propose an approach and time-line to phase it in along with the recommendations presented. 2. Joint Purchasing of Insurance and Other Commodities -Assess the current purchasing programs. B. Service Improvement 1. ISO -Consider how the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Division of Commercial Risk ratings for the fire services in Pinellas County can be improved. 2. Fire and Life Safe , Codes -Review the State of Florida Legislature actions relative to Fire and Life Safety Codes and develop a strategy for seeing the needs of Pinellas County are appropriately addressed. 3. Fire Hydrants and Water System Standard - Consider a countywide minimum standard for the installation of fire hydrants, water mains and water available for firefighting. 4. E uipment Compatibility -Review policies and practices for improving equipment compatibility among fire services countywide. C. Equitable Assignment of Costs: Study the fire services countywide and review levels and distribution of services, cost of services, the allocation of costs, and related factors including: 1. Fees -Evaluate the benefits of alternative fire funding sources. 2. Tax E uity -Evaluate the current funding methodologies to determine if costs are fairly spread over the properties and people receiving services. 3. SpecialtY_Team Support -Review the composition, training, and funding for each of the Special Services Programs including, Hazmat, Technical Rescue and Marine/ Water Rescue. D. EMS Transport: Study EMS Transport and evaluate whether cost might be lowered and/or performance improved by partially or fully combining EMS Transport with fire services. Task Force Members Ed Hooper, Chairperson Joe Calio Sally Foote Sally Israel Jerry Knight Kathleen Litton Timothy Schuler Staff Support James Callahan, Fire Chief, City of St Petersburg Fire Rescue Department Alternate: E. Caron Williams, Fire Chief, City of Largo Fire Rescue Department Page 2 1 Gay Lancaster, Chief Assistant County Administrator, Pinellas County Alternate: Chuck Kearns, Director, Pinellas County EMS and Fire Administration Findings and Facts A. Savings 1. Consolidation and/or Regionalization - It was the consensus that, while additional discussion may be necessary, it seems there is no driving force for a recommendation at this time. As a result of the current 9-1-1 call center and dispatch system together with automatic aid and closest unit response regardless of the jurisdiction, Pinellas County Fire Services are already functionally consolidated, even though areas such as administration, finances, personnel and equipment may not be as efficient and equitable as they might be if partially or wholly consolidated. It was stated that regionalization or reduction of the number of fire districts may make sense, but that current fire and EMS service contracts may make it a long-term endeavor. There have been some changes in the make-up, primarily due to annexations and contractual agreements in the Belleair/Belleair Bluffs area, Kenneth City, Redington Beaches, Tierra Verde, Gandy and High Point districts and through the creation of special independent fire districts since the last Charter Revision Commission reviewed EMS and fire services. It was generally thought that these consolidations could happen naturally over time, and that it is unlikely to occur or be successful through the application of pressure. The committee strongly supports voluntary regionalization efforts that would improve service and cost efficiencies. The committee discussed service contracts and the potential of agencies entering into contractual agreements to provide services that relied on neighboring departments to fulfill them through automatic aid. It was recommended that the County Fire Authority review these contracts and ensure that each contracting agency has its own resources necessary to fulfill the contract requirements and that the charge for services is appropriate. 2. Joint Purchasing of Insurance and Other Commodities -The Task Force observed that the practice of joint purchasing for expendable supplies and commodities, uniforms, and equipment be supported and encouraged in the fire service Countywide. For example, the Florida Association of Counties, Florida Sheriffs Association, and Florida Fire Chiefs Association recently developed a cooperative program for the purchase of all fire apparatus, rescue vehicles, ambulances, and law enforcement vehicles. This is a very comprehensive and cost effective program that covers the full range of Public Safety vehicle requirements. In addition, cost savings may be achieved by group purchasing of health insurance, workers compensation, and other similar benefits. ~ B. Service Improvement ,~ 1 Page 3 1. ISO -The current ISO classifications for Pinellas County Fire Departments range from a Class 2 to a Class 5. There are many benefits that encourage an improved ISO rating and result in reduced fire insurance rates. Many improvements have been made since the last countywide study in 1990 and should contribute to a reduced ISO classification. Fire insurance rates are one of the significant overhead costs to businesses and manufacturing which might locate in Pinellas County. Any reduction in those fire insurance rates would be a benefit to locating a business in Pinellas County. 2. Fire and Life Safety Codes -During the 2003 session, the Florida State Legislature adopted Senate Bi11592, which exempted certain condominium unit owners from retrofitting their units with fire sprinkler systems. The current State Uniform Building and Fire /Life Safety Codes were adopted by the state a few years ago and both contain provisions for amending or modifying the codes without having to go back to the state legislature. 3. Fire Hydrants and Water System Standards -Currently the water systems in the county do not use the same standard for the location and minimum fire flow requirements for fire hydrants. 4. Equipment Compatibility -There is only some limited incompatibility of equipment used by the fire service in the County (i.e. breathing apparatus). C. Equitable Assignment of Costs 1. Fees Equity -There is in excess of $18 billion of property in Pinellas County that is tax- exempt. Although these properties impose proportionate service demands on fire service, they do not contribute any funding to support fire services. 2. Tax Equity -Property owners in the unincorporated, dependent Fire Districts are assessed at varying millage rates for the same level of services. 3. S ep cialty Team Support Specialty teams are necessary for unique countywide hazardous materials and rescue incidents. Specialty teams are comprised from several, but not all, of the fire agencies. All communities benefit from the readiness of these resources to respond, but all do not contribute to funding each service. Hazardous Materials Team (St. Pete, Largo, Seminole, Palm Harbor, Pinellas Park) The County contributes $117,650 annually towards funding training programs, physical exams, operating supplies, maintenance and capital equipment for the Hazardous Materials Team. In addition, four (4) of the five (5) vehicles assigned to the Hazardous Materials Team were purchased by the County and are included in the County's Vehicle Replacement Program at an annual cost of $65,000. Page 4 Technical Rescue Team (St. Pete Clearwater Seminole Pinellas Park Lard The Technical Rescue Team receives approximately $24,000 annually from the County for ~~ operating supplies and training programs. The County also purchased the four (4) vehicles assigned to its team. Water/Marine Rescue (10 agencies with boats) Pinellas County is surrounded on 3 sides with water and is dotted by numerous ponds, lakes and thousands of public and backyard swimming pools. Each of these bodies of water represents the potential for injury and death. Public safety agencies have a responsibility to respond to any type of emergency whether it is on land or the water and each uses various resources to serve its community. There is no countywide standard for water rescue response as there is for HAZMAT and Technical Rescue. Water operations are divided into several categories and each requires a different type of response to mitigate the situation: o Marine rescue for boaters in distress o Marine search operations for lost boaters o Search operations for lost swimmers o Recovery operations for drowned swimmers o Recovery operations for lost or stolen items and evidence investigations o Swimming pool drowning incidents The county Fire and EMS Authorities do not provide any direct funding for the water rescue programs but do pay firefighter and paramedic salary cost as part of the Fire District and EMS District contracts for services with the cities and independent fire districts. D. EMS Transport - The EMS Authority is empowered to assess up to 1.5 mills for Emergency Medical Services through a countywide ad valorem tax. Through strong financial controls, the EMS Authority has been able to keep the EMS tax rate the same or lower level in 8 of the last 10 years. The current millage rate is 0.68 and funds ALS First Responder Services countywide. Collections from ambulance services offset taxes by several million dollars each year and cover the full cost of the ALS ambulance contract and County EMS Administration. The current ambulance contract requires a minimum 10-minute response time to 90% of emergency calls in Pinellas County. r Page 5 Conclusions and Recommendations A. Savings ~ Conclusion A. 1. Consolidation and/or Regionalization Consensus Vote Agencies should be encouraged to continue cooperative efforts to provide effective and efficient services and, where possible, merge organizations where efficiencies and cost savings benefit the community. o Recommendation A.1. The committee strongly supports voluntary regionalization efforts that improve service and cost efficiency. It is recommended that the County Fire Authority review contracts to ensure that each contracting agency has its own resources necessary to fulfill the contract requirements and that the charge for services is appropriate. ~ Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Fire Station List o Personnel List o Apparatus List o Current Millage Rates o Budget Documents o Fire District Maps e Implementation: o There is no implementation schedule at this time. o Ramifications of No Action: o The Pinellas County Fire Protection and EMS System are considered to be world class. Opportunities for improved efficiency may not be realized. Page 6 t • Conclusion A.2 Joint Purchasing Consensus Vote Past experience has shown that there are cost savings when multiple agencies can purchase larger quantities using the same specifications. o Recommendation A.2.1 It is recommended that the practice of joint purchasing for expendable supplies and commodities, uniforms and equipment be supported and encouraged in the fire service Countywide. o Recommendation A.2.2 It is further recommended that a consortium of city and independent fire district risk managers, personnel directors and purchasing directors participate in an ~~ exploratory study to determine if savings could be achieved by jointly purchasing workers compensation insurance, employee healthcare benefits and other programs and benefits where joint negotiations and procurement would result in cost reductions. • Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Florida Fire Chiefs State Purchasing Coop http://www.flsheriffs.org/03-04-0828 Bid Award.pdf • Implementation: o Utilize members of the Fire Chiefls Purchasing Committee and local Purchasing Directors to prepare an operating proposal for a countywide fire purchasing cooperative. _ • Ramifications of No Action: ~ o A countywide system is an opportunity for controlling costs to all users and guaranteeing long-term best prices. o Maximum cost savings on equipment, materials and vehicles will not be realized t 1 1 Page 7 t B. Service Improvement Conclusion B.1 ISO Consensus Vote An improved ISO rating Countywide may result in lower fire insurance rates primarily ~' for commercial and, to a lesser extent, residential properties. o Recommendation B.1.1 It is recommended that a consultant be hired by the County Fire Authority to review the property class status to determine if a countywide Class 3 rating can be obtained. o Recommendation B.1.2 ~ If it is recommended that a countywide Class 3 rating can be obtained, all jurisdictions would work to achieve this Class 3 rating goal o Recommendation B.1.3 It would be a condition of a formal Countywide ISO study that any fire service jurisdiction currently with a three (3) rating or better would incur no reduction in their current status. e Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Current ISO ratings for county departments 0 1990 ISO Study 0 1990 Automatic Aid Agreement Implementation: o Hire a fire service consultant to review the ISO classification potential countywide. o Based on consultant recommendations, the Fire Protection Authority would pursue implementation. ~ Ramifications of No Action: o Homeowners and business owners will continue to pay higher costs for insurance premiums. t r r Page 8 w • Conclusion B.2 Fire and Life Safety Codes Consensus Vote In 2003, the Florida Legislature enacted Section 617.01041, F. S. that exempted certain high-rise condominium owners from retrofitting their buildings with fire sprinkler systems. The task force objects to legislation that would weaken State Building and Fire / Life Safety Codes as they relate to fire safety. o Recommendation B.2.1 It is recommended that the Pinellas County legislative delegation prepare and support legislation which would restore the Fire Sprinkler Systems retrofit provision in the State Building and Fire /Life Safety Codes and require aphased- in full compliance by all high-rise residential occupancies over 75 feet in height. o Recommendation B.2.2 It is also recommended that the Pinellas County legislative delegation be requested: (A) to oppose legislation which would amend or change the State of Florida Building and Fire/Life Safety Codes, and (B) to support sending notification of any future requested legislative changes to the appropriate Florida state code enforcement and/or oversight agency for review and consideration. • Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Section 617.01401, F.S. and SB-592. • Implementation: o The local legislative delegation should be advised prior to the beginning of the 20041egislative Session that there is a process in existence to address code changes. As an example, legislation was passed under Section 617.01401, F.S. to permit condominium residents to exempt themselves from retrofitting high-rise buildings with built-in fire protection systems. o The County Legislative liaison should be made aware of the pending legislation and oppose the item. • Ramifications of No Action: o If no action takes place it is possible that all or many of the older high-rise '~ residential property owners will opt to exempt themselves from the retrofit requirements and over time injuries and fatalities to the residents and the firefighters who must respond to the fires will increase. As buildings age they become more susceptible to fire and thus are in need of built-in fire protection systems to assure the life safety of the occupants. o The failure to retrofit jeopardizes life safety and adversely affects ISO ratings and insurance costs and increases the cost of fire protection. o It is possible more legislation will be filed which may have the potential to continue to weaken the Building and Fire /Life Safety Codes. For example, it appears legislation will be filed again this coming year (2004), which will affect another portion of the retrofit requirements relating to balcony and hand railings. 1 Page 9 t o Conclusion B.3 Fire Hydrants and Water System Standard Consensus Vote There are numerous fire hydrant and water system standards throughout Pinellas County. Most cities have their own standards and the county has an internal hydrant policy. These standards and policies vary in many technical aspects. o Recommendation B.3 It is recommended that a standard be developed and implemented countywide for the installation of fire hydrants and which establish the minimum water flow requirements necessary for firefighting operations. A Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Proposed amendment to the Pinellas County Code, Chapter 62, which establishes a minimum standard for installation of fire hydrants and available fire flow. e Implementation: o Draft document was sent for the county's contract review on 11/24/03 o Propose a public hearing to be scheduled prior to 3/1/04 o Ramifications of No Action: o If no action is taken there will be no consistent standard for spacing and installing fire hydrants and ensuring adequate fire flow. o Residents and property owners will be jeopardized by the lack of access to adequate water supply during fire events. 1 1 Page 10 t • Conclusion B.4 Equipment Compatibility Consensus Vote All firefighting equipment should be compatible. o Recommendation B.4 It is recommended that all jurisdictions and fire officials work toward total compatibility of equipment countywide. • Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o There are no attachments. • Implementation o Make recommendation to jurisdictions and Fire Officials. • Ramifications of No Action: ~~ o Some limited incompatibility of equipment will continue to exist. 1 t 1 1 Page 11 t s fl C. Equitable Assignment of Costs Conclusion C.1 Fees Consensus Vote There is in excess of $18 Billion of property in Pinellas County that is tax-exempt. Although these properties impose proportionate service demands on fire service, they do not contribute any funding to support fire services. o Recommendation C.1 It is recommended that a countywide non-ad valorem assessment or fee, exempting only government and public educational facilities, be adopted as a funding alternative for fire services. Each jurisdiction should adopt the new funding method. ~ Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Sarasota County, City of Tallahassee and Pinellas Suncoast Fire Rescue District Fire Fee Schedules Implementation: o Hire a consultant to review potential for non-ad valorem assessment fee o Develop a countywide plan for review during FY 04/05 o Determine which departments and municipalities will participate o Amend County Code 62 to reflect new funding mechanism o Implement assessment fee with FY 05/06 e Ramifications of No Action: o Current users and property owners that are exempt from existing property taxes will continue to use the service and place additional loads on the fire system without paying any of the cost. 1 u Page 12 ~r ^ Conclusion C.2 Tax Equity The current millage rates in the unincorporated dependent fire districts range from 1.299 to 3.608. Because of the countywide Automatic Aid Agreement and closest unit response system, all residents in the unincorporated area receive the same level of fire service. o Recommendation C.2 If the recommendation for a countywide non-ad valorem assessment or fee is not implemented as outlined in C.1., the committee recommends that a uniform millage rate or fee be adopted for the unincorporated dependent fire districts. • Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o Current Millage Rates o Budget Documents • Implementation: o Develop a plan for implementation of uniform millage or fee in the unincorporated area o Determine new millage rate o Amend County Code 62 to reflect new funding mechanism o Implement during FY 05/06 budget • Ramifications of No Action: o Property owners in the unincorporated dependent districts will continue to be assessed unequal millage rates for the same level of fire service. t 1 Page 13 1 G Conclusion C.3 Specialty Team Support Consensus Vote A funding mechanism should be implemented that provides funding to the departments that provide specialty team services to offset the cost of extraordinary overtime for training, equipment and other associated expenses. Marine and Water Rescue teams should be evaluated and coordinated on a countywide basis. r o Recommendation C.3.1 It is recommended a plan be developed which utilizes the personnel, equipment and expertise of the public safety agencies within the county and establishes the minimum standards for participation and coordination of the marine and water rescue operations. o Recommendation C.3.2 It is recommended that the county establish a cost center within the General Fund Budget to provide Specialty Team training and equipment for members of the Hazmat, Technical Rescue, and Water Rescue teams. o Recommendation C.3.3 ~ It is recommended that alternative funding sources and mechanisms be researched and considered for supporting the cost of Specialty Teams. For example, surcharges, fees, fines or assessments could be charged to chemical producers, commercial entities, and other beneficiaries of the specific rescue service. e Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o There are no attachments Implementation: o Prepare a budget in spring of 2004 o Create a cost center in the County General Fund in spring of 2004 o Implement new funding system in the FY 05/06 Budget Ramifications of No Action: o Emergency Management and Fire District funds would continue to underwrite portions of the cost of the Hazardous Materials Team and the Technical Rescue Team. o The lack of funding and uniform standards for a countywide Water Rescue program will continue to exist. ~~~~ ~t ~' Li Page 14 fl D. EMS Transport • Conclusion D. EMS Transport Consensus Vote The EMS Authority should continue to strive for the highest quality Advanced Life Support (ALS) Ambulance Services at the most reasonable cost. '' o Recommendation D.1 The task force recommends that representatives of stakeholders (Fire Chiefs' Association, AMR, EMS Authority Staff, Office of the Medical Director) discuss the EMS Transport system concerning possible improvements of service. A. All interested parties shall be afforded an opportunity to present their views to this review committee. B. The review committee shall conduct their discussions within calendar year 2004. Indicate if there are attachments of background data. o There are no attachments • Implementation: o Any change in the EMS System should be carefully evaluated and methodically implemented by the EMS Authority. Representatives of stakeholders (Fire Chiefs' Association, AMR, EMS Authority Staff, Office of ~~ the Medical Director) shall meet in 2004 to discuss possible improvements of service in the EMS Transport system. • Ramifications of No Action: o An opportunity for improvement to our existing high quality EMS System maybe missed. Page 15 t r f ,.-~ ryp ~€ _ ~ . _ ., T ,~° hea I th care services TASK force MEMBERS: 1 1 Ronnie Duncan -Chair Larry Archbell Alan Bornstein Dr. William Hale Nancy Hamilton Elizabeth Mayhangian Dr. Carrie Nero Jonathan Wade staff suR~~: Evelyn R. Bethell, Director Virginia Rowell Pinellas County Human Services Dept. Intergovernmental Relations City of St. Petersburg Pinellas Assembly Health Care Services Task Force Report Executive Summary Name of task force Health Care Services Issue statement The health care needs of indigent residents are a countywide issue requiring greater collaborative efforts. ~ Task Force Objectives Develop methods for increased collaboration and planning to address the health care needs of indigent residents countywide. Task Force Members Ronnie Duncan, Duncan Companies, Chair Dr. William Hale Alan Bornstein, Creative Contractors Nancy Hamilton, CEO, Operation PAR Jonathan Wade, Director, Worknet One Stop Dr. Carrie Nero, Director Minority Health, Pinellas County Health Department Elizabeth Mayhangian, Citizen, Pinellas Park Larry Archbell, CEO, Suncoast Hospital Staff Evelyn R. Bethell, Director, Pinellas County Human Services Department Virginia Rowell, Intergovernmental Relations, City of St. Petersburg Findings and Facts Health care issues and access to care in Pinellas County is not limited to or focused only on the indigent. Although this is a major component, the health of the entire community is critical to the current and future quality of life and to the continued economic engine on which the County's vitality is based. Traditional health care for the community cannot continue to be provided primarily by the not for profit and profitable health care providers in the private sector. An equitable partnership must be created involving both public and private stakeholders. Although there are numerous public sector programs and providers, there appears to be little coordination and limited awareness throughout the larger public andprivate network. There is no one "clearing house "for public and private sector programs in the County. As a result, there is a disjoint within the larger system leading to duplication, overlap or lack of certain services and creating consternation among the public and users of health care services. No continuity exists in communication/education and service and delivery. Three primary issues exist: (1) Access to health care coverage/services, (2) the efficient delivery of services and, (3) the funding of service providers both public and private. The County currently pays some proportionate share (funding into a state health care 'pool " (as do other counties and hospitals) based upon the percentage of indigent and yet receives a small, disproportionate share of that money in return from the state. State funding is difficult to estimate in that statute provides for funding but that funding must be appropriated each year. The Legislature has not maintained the appropriation of some funding (in particular since 1991). Funding also is available through EMS. However, this funding source is problematic and the appropriation process should be reviewed/revised. State and/or federal funding is available for public sector programs but local service providers are unable to take advantage of certain funding due to human resource constraints - no other `party" i~ ~II _J exists to develop grants or request funding on behalf of some programs. The result is that money is often left on the table and opportunities to pursue or leverage funding are missed. The Partnership for a Healthier Pinellas initiative incorporates many of the same principles as the Health Care Services Task Force and because the Partnership is currently working to address similar issues, we would like to recognize those efforts and offer support for its work. Conclusions and Recommendations - (Note: Individual consensus votes are not noted as the Task Force was in full agreement on each issue.) o Conclusion A There appears to be a disconnect among service providers resulting in duplication, ineffiencies, and lack of collaboration. The general public and business community are often unaware of availability of programs/services. o Recommendation 1 Statement Create better-defined coalitions and new partnerships through education. Identify stakeholders and create educational opportunities for collaborative growth, learning and education. o Recommendation 2 Statement Develop incentives to reward innovative coalition/partnerships. e Conclusion B There is a lack of communication and outreach to the people, businesses and other governmental agencies regarding the multitude of services available to assist with improving the health and well being of the Pinellas County public. The lack of communication and outreach negatively impacts the cost and quality of service provided within our regional community. ,~ o Recommendation 1 Statement Utilize the Partnership for a Healthier Pinellas to develop communication opportunities to educate other partners in the collaborative as well as the public, local government agencies, health care providers and other populations affected by service availability. o Recommendation 2 Statement Develop marketing strategies to promote health related programs and projects taking place in the Pinellas County community. o Recommendation 3 Statement Create a public information outreach program that would participate in studying trends, measures and other quantitative and qualitative data to monitor the status of health care and well being in Pinellas County. ~ Conclusion C In order to pursue improved health care and well being for the Pinellas County community, it is necessary to identify viable funding sources. Directly related to funding sources, is the identification of the optimal use of the available financial resources. o Recommendation 1 Statement Identify and pursue various sources of private and public sector funding for health care and well being initiatives. o Recommendation 2 Statement Identify various options for using acquired funds for health care and well being initiatives and partnering with other entities where appropriate. o Recommendation 3 Statement Create a 501(c)3 to assist in funding acquisition. Health Care Services Task Force Final Report 2 • Conclusion D There is a critical need to identify and utilize and pursue appropriate legislative options to improve and enhance health care options for the Pinellas County community. o Recommendation 1 Statement Appropriate funding for a lobbyist dedicated to federaUstate/local health care initiatives. o Recommendation 2 Statement Identify and pursue the change of specific rules/statutes at both nationaUstate levels that benefit health care and well being initiatives by leveraging/generating funding (such as HealthFlex Plan pilot; Medicaid reform; EMS funding redistribution, advocacy to ,~ maintain levels of state funding for state administered programs). • Conclusion E It is essential to implement long-term visioning and planning processes to guide the efforts needed to ensure the most effective and efficient provision of health care services to the community. o Recommendation 1 Statement Develop a strategic planning process based on five (5) year planning cycles. o Recommendation 2 Statement Hire and work with a consultant to develop the first (1 S`) five (5) year strategic plan. o Recommendation 3 Statement Identify best practices to guide and measure future work. Summary There are several strategies and action steps that are recommended in this Report. The Health Care Services Task Force developed these recommendations in concert. Each strategy has an associated cost or capital or resource requirement and the Task Force recognizes this requirement. However, the Task Force believes that it is more important to first develop the concept or strategy and if it receives consensus and adoption, the cost or resource allocation can then be addressed. Developing an understanding and acknowledgement between the County, public and private providers, the business community, and the community at large as to the depth and impact of the issue in Pinellas County is the key to the success of the Task Force's recommendations. Primary to accomplishing this task is the "need to be on the same page" and the development of a public awareness program incorporating the aforementioned initiatives and strategies in order to better equip the community to address current and emerging needs. The creation of an overall communications program as an initiative between the County and the many other service providers and programs, both public and private, as well as the business community would allow us to promote a better understanding of funding sources - (i) public legislative/statutory programs (ii) public sector grants (iii) private sector grants (iv) County initiatives and potential changes (v) state (such as Medicaid) funding and potential changes. It is essential to seek enhanced focused political discussion on the health care issue, as it now has become a "crisis ". This requires public communication and education through the media and private sector that should be coordinated with local elected bodies. Health Caze Services Task Force Final Report 3 1 1 v k ~ F~ ~~ ~- ~~~ [~ ! f i' ii ~ ~ t s' Law enforcement structures& financing TASK force Members: 1 Terry England -Chair Bruce Geer Jack Latvala Nancy Loehr Lisa McIntryre Charles Rainey David Welch John Zurenda Staff Su~nort: James Dates, Director Pinellas County Department of Justice & Consumer Services Sidney Klein, Police Chief City of Clearwater Pinellas Assembly Report Task Force: Law Enforcement Structures and Financing Task Force Issue Statement: The task force was established to review areas in which law enforcement processes within Pinellas County could be streamlined to promote cost savings and enhanced public safety for citizens. Task Force Objectives: The task force objectives as established included: 1) Identify functional areas where additional efficiencies and/or cost savings could be accomplished, 2) Explore identified areas through research and input from affected agencies, 3) Provide positive recommendations on identified items that would provide benefit to Pinellas County. Task Force Members: Committee: Terry England, Chair Bruce Geer Jack Latvala Lisa McIntryre Charles Rainey David Welch Nancy Loehr John Zurenda Staff James Dates Sid Klein Findings and Facts: The task force found a number of examples of agencies working together to enhance public safety within the county. Although there were a number of areas in which agencies work closely together every day, agencies acknowledged, and helped to identify, additional areas in which processes can be improved. A number of functional areas were identified for exploration by the task force. These areas covered issues ranging from improving daily operational processes and services to the status of existing programs and technology. During the task force process, a retreat was held between all of the law enforcement agencies within Pinellas County to help identify areas for improvement. These items were discussed and positions on each item were presented to the task force. Task force chair Terry England was present at the law enforcement retreat. Items determined to be infeasible for consideration at this time or unnecessary to law enforcement processes were discarded and not carried forward for recommendation. Some of these items included consolidation of all law enforcement services(removed 5-1 with mention that this is not the appropriate time, but that it may be something to pursue ~~ u in the future), participatory management of consolidated services(removed 5-1), expanded air support(removed 6-0), school programs(DARE, etc-removed 6-0), School Resource Officer employment(removed 6-0), etc. The remaining task force recommendations are items that are able to be accomplished and that will have a significant impact on Pinellas County. For these recommendations, funding was not part of the consideration. It is anticipated that the recommendations could be implemented over time. Six(6) members of the task force were present for the final recommendation meeting on October 28, 2003. Attachments to this report include: o Municipal Report to the Law Enforcement Structures and Financing Task Force e Pinellas County Sheriff s Office Report to the Law Enforcement Structures and Financing Task Force Pinellas Police Standards Council Retreat Report from August 2003 Pinellas Police Standards Council Post Retreat Results Conclusions and Recommendations: Conclusion A: The Pinellas County Sheriff s Office has significant forensic capabilities that would benefit Pinellas County agencies and would provide standard services countywide. o Recommendation 1: Consensus Vote 5-1 It is recommended that the Pinellas County Sheriff s Office provide forensic services countywide. o Recommendation 2: Consensus Vote 5-1 It is recommended that the Pinellas County Sheriff s Office take over property and evidence storage and disposal services countywide o Recommendation 3: Consensus Vote 5-1 It is recommended that the Pinellas County Sheriff s Office take over fingerprint services countywide. o Conclusion B: Consensus Vote 6-0 Agencies should be able to provide traffic enforcement and crash investigations within the jurisdictions of other agencies when appropriate. o Recommendation 1: It is recommended that the task force support the establishment of mutual aid agreements already in process to include traffic enforcement and crash investigations on streets contiguous to the jurisdiction of participating agencies. Conclusion C: Consensus Vote 6-0 Individual agencies currently receive information and track and disseminate notifications on sexual offenders and predators. This can be a time consuming process which currently requires agencies to frequently update and maintain their own separate processes for notification. o Recommendation 1: It is recommended that the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office take over sex offender and predator management and notification services countywide in order to facilitate a standard, centralized approach. 1 • Conclusion D: Consensus Vote 6-0 1 All agencies within Pinellas county have to regularly transport prisoners to the county jail. This process can be very time consuming and takes needed resources away from regular patrol. o Recommendation 1: It is recommended that the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office establish a prisoner transport service to move prisoners from agency locations to the county jail. • Conclusion E: Consensus Vote 5-1 Agencies participating in the consolidation of services need to be involved in the process to understand how the functions will be carried out and act in an advisory role on the establishment of the consolidated services for their jurisdiction. o Recommendation 1: It is recommended that the Pinellas Police Standards Council members act in an advisory role in the establishment of consolidated countywide services. • Conclusion F: Coordinated Information Technology efforts are vital to enhancing public safety and saving money. Often, agencies pursue technology needs specific to their own department with little or no coordination between surrounding jurisdictions. o Recommendation 1: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support a coordinated countywide law enforcement records depository o Recommendation 2: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support coordinated mobile data ~ efforts ~ o Recommendation 3: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support the coordination of consolidated electronic traffic tickets. o Recommendation 4: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support the creation of a centralized record management system for law enforcement. o Recommendation 5: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that-the task force support the upgrade of countywide radio system emergency capabilities. o Recommendation 6: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support the creation of a countywide pawn records database that is in progress. o Recommendation 7: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support the establishment of a countywide emergency radio channel that can be monitored by all agencies so officers can call for assistance without waiting for relays through dispatch. 1 o Recommendation 8: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support the development of a streamlined approach to traffic records that would reduce the data entry load and make records easily available within the criminal justice system. o Recommendation 9: Consensus Vote 6-0 It is recommended that the task force support the development of a countywide autodialer approach to provide access to autodialer capabilities to all law enforcement agencies with Pinellas County. u [] [l 0 ~' J n (~ J L 1! r :.` ~ ~, ~~ ~~ F ;~'', ~- s~ ~ -- . ,-F E ,~ ~ ~ir' ~ ~ f~ ~ - y ~ -~ _ ~ ,t .~. ,,.fi ~~ ~ ; recreation structures & financing TASK force Members: Jerry Provenzano -Chairman Carlen Peterson -Vice Chairman Jim Appelt Chris Eaton Elizabeth Darnell John Day Steve Heller Ralph Marlow Staff SuR°ort: Elizabeth Warren, Director Lynn Rives, Parks & Recreation Director Pinellas County Parks Department City of Oldsmar PINELLAS ASSEMBLY RECREATION, STRUCTURES AND FINANCING TASK FORCE REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY December 19, 2003 Name of Task Force Recreation, Structures and Financing Task Force Issue statement It is our overall recommendation that the County, Cities and not for profit organizations continue to search for and participate in mutually beneficial programs to provide recreational opportunities for all citizens. The spirit of mutual trust, respect and cooperation that is so prevalent in sports must also take hold in this endeavor of intergovernmental relationships. Task Force Objectives 1. ToyTown Property 2. Pinellas County School Board 3. Therapeutic Recreation 4. MSTU 5. Municipal Recreation Card Fee Reimbursement 6. Grants 7. Sponsorships 8. Redevelopment Task Force Members Jerry Provenzano -Chairman Carlen Peterson -Vice Chairman Elizabeth Warren -County Staff Support Lynn Rives -City Staff Support Jim Appelt Chris Eaton Elizabeth Darnell John Day Steve Heller Ralph Marlow Findings and Facts The Recreation Task Force has met since the summer and heard numerous presentations regarding the strengths and weaknesses of recreational opportunities available to the residents of Pinellas County. We also heard from several special interest groups as to their wants and needs. One of the obvious conclusions is that virtually all public athletic/recreation complexes in Pinellas County are actually in and have been developed by the individual municipalities. Citizens in the unincorporated areas of Pinellas County are usually required to pay an additional fee to the individual City in order to participate in activities on City facilities. This seems fair since City taxpayers have invested some significant funds to acquire and develop those complexes. In the very recent past, Pinellas County has seen the wisdom in the establishment of working relationships with selected Cities and the School Board, as the opportunities have arisen. One stellar example of such cooperation is the arrangement between the County and Dunedin centering on the use of St. Andrew's Golf Course. Such cooperative effort is long overdue. Only through an atmosphere of mutual trust, respect and cooperation will all Pinellas County residents be able to reap the benefits from available recreational opportunities. This effort, under the banner of the Pinellas Assembly has brought together 69 of Pinellas County's top business and professional leaders to serve on 7 different Task Forces. Over the past few months, there have been countless meetings and thousands of volunteer hours logged with the common goal of exploring ways that Pinellas County and the 24 municipalities within the County can work together toward common goals. The committee held 14 meetings, reviewed data, heard from 14 different speakers, and assessed both the short term and long term needs of the county (municipalities and unincorporated areas) and makes the following observations: 1. ToyTown Property • Municipalities are not able to accommodate all of the need of unincorporated population in their recreation programs. Many of their programs are at capacity with their own population served. • Recreation needs are shifting as the demographics of the county change. Additionally recreation needs and interests are changing and expanding due to the interest in new types of activities such as extreme sports, innovative team events, and sports brought by foreign visitors and residents. • Recreational needs will increase in the county due to the increasing interest in exercise in the U.S. • Rounds of golf have been steadily declining in most regions of the U.S. including Florida. Many of the areas golf courses are struggling and the addition of a new one would negatively impact these courses. Based on the trends, golf does not appear to be a sport on the rise in this County. • By providing additional recreational facilities the County could reduce the demand in some of the municipalities programs thus allowing them to have space for the unincorporated population. If the County has new fields for certain uses, then the municipalities could shift some activities to those County fields thereby increasing capacity for other activities. • As a former land fill the ToyTown facility has limited future uses. 2. Pinellas County School Board - An obvious problem facing growth and development of recreational facilities in Pinellas County is the shortage of available land for such use in the county. A viable solution to the problem is to open school board property and athletic facilities, when not in use, to the public. It can be argued that tax payers' money is used to purchase and maintain said property and, therefore, the public should have access to the property when not in use by the school. With the exception of a few joint use agreements, this does not occur and, in fact, most schools are fenced and locked after school hours, precluding the public from using the property. As mentioned, the school board currently has several joint use agreements with various municipalities and is not opposed to entering into more of such agreements. The principle concern of the school board is the possible liability associated with opening school board 1 i property during non-school hours. Accordingly, the current after school hour users of school board property are those organizations with insurance that relieves the school board of potential liability. Thus, the school board is amenable to joint use of its property, if the school board is relieved of liability for such use. Another factor to be considered is the operating and maintenance costs of using school property during non-school hours. In addition to existing school board facilities in Pinellas County, there are thirteen undeveloped sites, totaling three hundred and thirty five (335) acres held in a school board land bank for future use. (Information given by Jim Miller at the June 26 meeting -see minutes) These acres, conceivably, could be used as field space until needed for school board use. It should also be noted that there are twelve municipalities without schools within their boundaries. 3. Therapeutic Recreation -Recreation is a service that should be available to all of Pinellas County citizens, including the special needs population. Our review of recreation programs in Pinellas County shows a lack of available inclusionary programs and facilities. St. Petersburg is the only city in Pinellas County that has a thriving therapeutic recreation program. Capacity issues need to be addressed. Clearwater, Largo and Dunedin are making tentative steps into therapeutic recreation but are a long way away from a thriving program. Transportation to and from centers seems to be a much needed service. 4. MSTU -Pinellas County seeks to promote access for unincorporated residents into City run facilities. It is our considered opinion that the County should increase the portion of MSTU dollars that are currently directed toward recreation. Conservative estimates are that well over $100 million have been invested by the Cities into recreational facilities around the County. Offering funding of $1.8 million per year is inadequate for full participation in municipal facilities. ' 5. Municipal Recreation Card Fee Reimbursement -Currently unincorporated residents who must pay the non-resident fees are eligible to apply to Pinellas County for a reimbursement of those fees. ,~ 6. Grants -One of the stated desires of County staff is the attempt to "level the playing field" with respect to the additional fees currently paid by unincorporated residents when ~ participating in Municipality hosted activities. The Cities are autonomous with respect to creation of their own taxes and fees. The County can only offer incentives to the Cities in order to have some of those fees reduced. 7. Sponsorships -Encourage the County and Municipalities to provide opportunities for appropriate commercial messages and recognition of financial support. Sponsorship advertising and signage can provide significant dollars to augment municipal and County budgets. 8. Redevelopment -There is very little open land available within Pinellas County for recreational or any other use. We are facing a wave of re-development throughout the County. Most Cities and the County have open space/recreational components in their current codes. Since many of the parcels for re-development were developed prior to the adoption of these codes and since most land use agreements run with the land, consideration of this topic may be appropriate. [] ~J Conclusions and Recommendations 1. ToyTown Property All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 Based on those observations the committee makes the following recommendations regarding the 270 acres at ToyTown: a. The ToyTown acreage should be used for the development of recreational multi- use fields, not a golf course. b. The County should appoint a task force to address the development of this sports/recreational multi-use field complex at ToyTown. This task force would review the needs, costs and options for construction and management. These multi-use fields could include sports fields (soft ball, soccer, rugby, Frisbee golf, etc.), bike trails, extreme sports areas (skate boarding, bmx track, etc.), food areas; running and walking trails; areas designed for team competitions; etc. for the needs of county residents. c. The county should seek input on the types of sports facilities needed in such a complex from the recreational directors of all municipalities. Each municipality does not have the capacity to build facilities for every emerging sport. For example it is not realistic for each municipality to construct a BMX track. These types of specialized needs should be incorporated into a countywide sports complex or at least be addressed in a countywide recreation plan. d. In addition to providing increased recreation space and opportunities for our residents, the proposed complex could provide substantial economic impact by hosting invitational tournaments and events. 2. Pinellas County School Board All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend encouraging a joint use agreement between the School Board, the County and all municipalities, where appropriate, for use of all recreational facilities. Further, risk management research should be conducted to resolve the issues concerning the potential liability and responsibility associated with the use of said facilities. In addition, research should be conducted to determine how best to apportion operating and maintenance costs incurred when school property is used during non-school hours. 3. Therapeutic Recreation All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend that City and County staff be directed to survey and inventory therapeutic recreation needs and gaps in Pinellas County. They should explore the possibilities to partner with non-profits and or hospitals. Staff will establish by January 2005, a Directory of Services, programs (fee and free) and determine budget estimates for providing therapeutic recreation in north, mid and south county. Pinellas County should act as a broker and not the sole provider of these services. 1 ~1 LJ 4. MSTU All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend the County should increase the MSTU dollars currently directed toward recreation. 5. Municipal Recreation Card Fee Reimbursement All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend that only households that qualify for the School Lunch Programs or other such public assistance would be eligible fora "Municipal Recreation Card Reimbursement". We further recommend that those households that qualify be admitted to their program of choice without the need to pay the up-front fees to the City, and that the City involved request fee reimbursement from Pinellas County. We further recommend that qualifying households be limited to one "Recreation Card Reimbursement" per calendar year, per person. When applicable, a family recreation card should be utilized; otherwise reimbursement would be on a per capita basis. 6. Grants All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend that through the "Quid Pro Quo" of agrant-funding program, individual Cities could choose to avail themselves of County funding grants for recreational purposes. Depending on the size of the grant requested, the City could be requested to reduce the non-resident fee by a negotiated amount for a negotiated time. 7. Sponsorships All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend that the study objectives should include the identification of market potential; estimated revenue projections; various levels of sponsorship and naming rights opportunities in. comparison to other governmental contracts and offer the ramifications and opportunities of each sponsorship level. This should involve synthesizing successful programs and identifying good "fits" for the community. 8. Redevelopment All in Agreement -Consensus Vote 8-0 We recommend the County and Cities explore the idea of an open space/recreation component when a parcel of land is up for redevelopment. 1 L PINELLAS ASSEMBLY RECREATION, STRUCTURES AND FINANCING TASK FORCE REPORT SPECIFIC BACKGROUND ON TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS Summary of Facts and Conclusions The Recreation Task Force has met since the summer and heard numerous presentations regarding the strengths and weaknesses of recreational opportunities available to the residents of Pinellas County. We also heard from several special interest groups as to their wants and needs. One of the obvious conclusions is that virtually all public athletic/recreation complexes in Pinellas County are actually in and have been developed by the individual municipalities. Citizens in the unincorporated areas of Pinellas County are usually required to pay an additional fee to the individual City in order to participate in activities on City facilities. This seems fair since City taxpayers have invested some significant funds to acquire and develop those complexes. In the very recent past, Pinellas County has seen the wisdom in the establishment of working relationships with selected Cities and the School Board, as the opportunities have arisen. One stellar example of such cooperation is the arrangement between the County and Dunedin centering on the use of St. Andrew's Golf Course. Such cooperative effort is long overdue. Only through an atmosphere of mutual trust, respect and cooperation will all Pinellas County residents be able to reap the benefits from available recreational opportunities. This effort, under the banner of the Pinellas Assembly has brought together 69 of Pinellas County's top business and professional leaders to serve on 7 different Task Forces. Over the past few months, there have been countless meetings and thousands of volunteer hours logged with the common goal of exploring ways that Pinellas County and the 24 municipalities within the County can work together toward common goals. Implementation: Since our recommendations involve study and evaluation by municipalities and Board of County Commissioners, we are not recommending any specific implementation path so the issues of legalities, funding and personnel needs are not addressed. Ramifications of No Action: If no action were taken, the ramifications would be a continuation of the existing situation. J 0 7 1 0 [] U 0 0 J r C r. t u 1 1 u ~, ~? ~ f "~. Fr i ~I ,.... ~~ ~ ~• ~, , '~_ Y transportation integration TASK force Members: Frank Murphy -Chairman Kevin Schuyler -Vice Chairman Don Crane Joel Giles Roy Harrell Jim Holton Ed Hawkes Joe Kubicki Julio Maggi Staff Support: Brian Smith, Director Pinellas County Planning Department Pete Pensa City of Largo 1 White Paper for the Transportation Integration Task Force of the Pinellas Assembly Transportation Integration Committee Issue Statement: Pinellas County is at a watershed moment in time. To sustain economic development, Pinellas County must continue to grow and maintain a transportation infrastructure that supports growth by promoting the efficient movement of people and goods. However, there remains little "Greenfield" land for development, and limited opportunity to build or expand roadways within its geographic boundaries. During the past half century, our land use policies and transportation strategies have produced sprawl and almost total automobile dependence. The time is now fora "sea change" in land use policy and transportation strategy that will dramatically reduce automobile dependence, increase transportation efficiency and enhance our quality of life. This task force recommends an aggressive, multi-pronged approach that simultaneously addresses (1) land use policy, (2) transportation funding, and (3) transportation capacity improvements. Land Use Policy We must acknowledge that Pinellas is an urbanized county. Our zoning codes and development regulations should be immediately revamped to provide for increased density and mixed use development in focused areas together with appropriate public open space, based on a consensus of a comprehensive vision for the future. These policies should foster mutually beneficial partnerships between the public and private sectors. Public policy should enlist the economic self-interest of the free markets in the service of the community. Infill redevelopment should be particularly encouraged and nurtured in a manner that provides for internal capture of vehicle trips and converts vehicular trips to pedestrian trips, thereby significantly reducing automobile dependence and allowing for more efficient utilization of existing roadways, while strengthening our neighborhoods, communities, institutions and social fabric. New development and redevelopment patterns will emerge as a result of such new policies, dramatically improving the level of service of our transportation infrastructure before spending a single dollar on capacity improvements. These development patterns will create ridership characteristics that will support future mass transit, and attract creative individuals, businesses, industries and capital. Transportation Funding There are several improvements that should be made to our existing roadway network. The existing ' systems for coordination and control of traffic signals should be upgraded and integrated. Planning and right-of--way acquisition for future fixed-guideway mass transit infrastructure should be undertaken. Beautification of existing traffic corridors should be accomplished. Regrettably, current ' funding levels for transportation are woefully inadequate (more than a half billion dollars short for roadway capacity projects alone). Therefore, Pinellas County should immediately (and simultaneously with an overhaul of its land use policies), enact its maximum local gasoline tax option, and leverage that revenue stream to create as large a pool of funds as possible to construct as many of the necessary roadway capacity improvements set forth in this white paper as possible. This revenue stream could be leveraged to perhaps more than $400mm. Since this will not be enough to complete all the required capacity improvements, the County should aggressively pursue additional federal and state funds on the strength of its willingness to take full advantage of its local taxation options. In addition, there are various other funding sources that should be carefully explored such as (1) additional sales tax, (2) FIHS dollars, (3) transit surtax, and (4) tolls. Transportation Capacity Improvements There are several roadway capacity improvements that must be completed as set forth in this white paper. These improvements are at various stages of planning and funding. They include significant improvements to US 19, Ulmerton Road, Gandy Blvd, Roosevelt Blvd and the 118`h Street Connector. In addition, improvements must be made to Gulf Blvd to ensure the continued vitality of the beaches and the tourism industry that is one of the cornerstones of our vibrant economy. At some point, the existing, independently operating traffic signal control systems throughout the County should be upgraded and integrated. The Pinellas trail system must be completed. The new development and redevelopment patterns that will emerge from the revamped land policies will create the ridership characteristics to economically support future mass transit. Provisions should be made now to efficiently implement affixed-guideway component of comprehensive transportation strategy as the demand arises. Timely implementation of capacity improvements, pursued simultaneously with sweeping land use policy changes and effective funding strategies will foster intelligent growth, nurture economic development and enhance quality of life. Do we want to be a first tier metropolitan area? Or are we content with second or third tier status? It starts with a vision of what Pinellas County wants to be in 10, 20, 50 years. It will gain momentum on strength of courageous leadership and persuasive articulation of that vision. It will take flight only upon the aggressive and simultaneous implementation of sweeping land use policy changes and effective funding strategies for the transportation infrastructure improvements required to sustain growth and economic development while enhancing quality of life. Success will depend on the willingness of this community to make the tough choices and the necessary sacrifices to achieve greatness. The alternative is mediocrity, stagnation and eventual decline. Task Force Objective: The Pinellas community will have completed specific actions to create mobility improvements for the County. These improvements will occur in the next five years and prepare us for the future. The actions taken will reflect the transportation importance of Pinellas County to the entire Tampa Bay community as it relates to the seamless movement of people and goods. These actions, which will flow from adecision- making mechanism and structure, will be planned to enhance the quality of life of our community. Our quality of life enhancements will ensure the safety of our community, the improvement of the environment and the economic strength of Pinellas County Task Force Members: Frank Murphy, (Chairman) Don Crane, Roy Harrell, Jim Holton Joe Kubicki, Non voting Julio Maggi Kevin Schuyler, (Vice Chairman) Ed Hawkes, Joel Giles Brian Smith, Staff Support, County Pete Pensa, Staff Support, City Eva Andujar, Recording Clerk, St. Petersburg Finding and Facts The Committee during the course of several months convened 8fact-finding sessions concerning the status of transportation in Pinellas County. Through those sessions, the committee gained an understanding of the issues and the various government initiatives that were responding to those issues. The committee evolved 1 1 ~.~ into a good general understanding of the practical concerns with what can really be done concerning transportation in Pinellas County. Several themes begin to evolve that have helped the committee to focus its efforts. One theme is that of quality of life, and that perspective for the citizens of Pinellas County. There appears to be a strong sense of interest in matters that come under this heading of quality of life. In addition, the committee has observed that what were viewed as solutions 30 years ago are no longer viewed in the same light. Therefore, the committee sees the County expanding from a focus on highway improvements, to a focus on other means of travel, such as transit, bicycle, and pedestrian modes. It is also observed that whatever direction is taken with respect to transportation initiatives, there is the need to view the governance and the revenue sources in that regard. It was with these considerations in mind that the committee has developed a series of findings and facts which are the subject of this section of the report. TRAFFIC CONTROLS The situation of traffic controls within Pinellas County was evaluated in some depth. Traffic Controls encompass signage (both regulatory, and non regulatory), controls during construction, railroad crossings, school crossings, traffic signals, pavement markings, roadway median openings, traffic calming, to name several of a multiplicity of functions. The State Department of Transportation controls these functions on the State highway System. However, on the County roadway system, these traffic controls are governed by the County in the unincorporated area, and governed by the the various municipalities in their jurisdictions. It should be noted that there is another level of roadways referred to as collectors and local roads. These are controlled by whichever jurisdiction they fall within. This is the system within which the 790 traffic signals within Pinellas County are operated. It was concluded that most of the items under the subject of traffic control would be appropriately handled at the local jurisdictional level (City or County) because of the community level of sensitivity. However the committee identified the functions of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) portion of the traffic signal system which includes approximately 400 signals, which should be separated out for countywide management, since the management of traffic on the major arteries should be a priority that should not vary from one jurisdiction to the next. There is discussion of an interlocal agreement between the County and cities to accomplish this. It was concluded as a minimum there should be a central agency or committee that would manage the equipment and software that is used for the ITS throughout Pinellas County. This agency should be the County. In addition, the County should administer protocols that place a priority on the efficient movement of traffic, both under normal conditions, and under conditions where traffic needs to be adjusted due to incidents or special situations. It was further concluded that the financial responsibility for this part of the signal system should be placed at the county level. However it must be emphasized that there are many functions such as the priority for pedestrian movement or special events that have a community interest. These system decisions that affect such concerns should be approached in a way that takes into account those community concerns. Therefore, whatever decision making procedure is used for the countywide signal system, there needs to be a provision for input or involvement from local agencies. ROADWAY CAPACITY The committed plans for roadway improvement as identified in the MPO plan were assessed. There is already a regional roadway network which would provide considerable capacity for the movement of traffic, not only in the County, but also to locations outside the County. While it is recognized that Pinellas County is built to a point where there are limited opportunities for new roadway corridors, there are several existing corridors that are identified for capacity expansion. This would include such comdors as US 19, Ulmerton Road, the Roosevelt/118"' Ave. connectors and Gandy_Blvd. Specifically US 19 is to be a controlled access roadway, with service roads, from SR 580 to 49`x' Street. US 19 is the subject of a channelized median program in conjunction with an added lane project. The combination of these initiatives will make US 19 an excellent north/south artery through Pinellas County. Since this is a State corridor, the funding for this program has been derived through the efforts of the MPO and FDOT. Most of the improvements for US 19 are either in place or programmed for the next 5 years. The exception is the section of US 19 between SR 60 and Whitney Road. At this time there is not adequate funding committed for the construction work in that area. Ulmerton Road is the major east/west artery of the County and it is programmed to be a 61ane arterial. It should be noted that there is considerably less right of way in this corridor than US 19, and considerable less opportunity for improvement. Funding is also needed for construction of key sections of this roadway. These sections are from west of 38`h Street to I275, and from west of Belcher Road to west of Keene Road. The third regional capacity initiative is in the Roosevelt Blvd. Area. The MPO plan defines an expressway that would connect the south end of the Bayside Bridge to I-275. This is referred to as the new Roosevelt Connector. To provide system continuity, the 118`h Ave. connector is a proposed expressway that would connect US 19 to the new Roosevelt Connector. With this initiative, a traveler can proceed north on the interstate from St. Petersburg, then proceed west on the Roosevelt/118`h Connector System to US 19 and proceed north. This will all be done without the driver encountering a traffic light. It should be noted there is very little construction money that is assigned or available to this connector system. The fourth capacity corridor is the conversion of Gandy Blvd. to a controlled accesses facility. This comdor would start at US 19 and proceed east to the causeway. Included within this corridor would be a major interchange at the crossing of 4`h and 9`h Streets, which would be the priority improvement in this corridor. The preliminary corridor evaluations have been completed, but there are no funds committed to the design or construction of this improvement. In summary, the priorities for capacity improvements are: US Hwy 19, Ulmerton Road, Roosevelt/118th Ave Connectors, and Gandy Blvd. It must be emphasized these corridors are all identified in the MPO plan and the FDOT program. The strategic issue for these projects is the funding requirements. It should be noted from the background materials in the appendix of this report that these projects would total $1.1 billion. The committee would note that while other road improvements have been identified, these road improvements which are located on the State system, would provide considerable Countywide benefit to the County, and should be the subject of not only local the gas tax commitment, but also federal and State revenue initiatives, and possibly in some form, a toll initiative. A suggested approach would be as follows: U.S. 19 would continue to be funded by special allocation efforts from federal and State Sources. The same approach could apply to the completion of the Ulmerton Road corridor. However, the Roosevelt/118`h connector system improvements should be evaluated with respect to the feasibility of whether the system can be implemented using revenues that are generated from some form of toll and bonding system. The committee would question the feasibility of this full connector system without some form of toll revenues_ TRANSIT The history of mass transit in Pinellas County, and the current operations of not just the PSTA bus system, but also several specialized trolley systems has been carefully evaluated. It was noted that there was considerable interest in the County in using alternative means of transportation, other than car travel. However, the committee also notes that the current bus system is not viewed as an attractive option or an adequate response to that interest. Traditional bus service does not appear to be what the general public is interested in. If the County is to proceed forward, making mass transit a viable alternative, it has to be provided in a way that people will be attracted to use the system, as opposed to using it because there is no other alternative. This would mean that service must be focused and designed in response to what peoples needs are, and that that service be attractive and enjoyable to use. The success of the Gulf Beach trolley is noted as an example of this. Since this trolley service was installed, its ridership has steadily climbed and it is an example of the type of service that people would prefer. Another aspect of the transit situation is the fact that PSTA does not include all of the communities in Pinellas County. The cities of Treasure Island, St. Pete Beach, Belleair Beach, Belleair Shores and Kenneth City and the unincorporated areas of Tierra Verde and South Pasadena Fire Department are not included in J L~ u i~ r i ~~ 1 the authority service area. For transit to be truly effective as a mode, there should be an agency that can function countywide with a revenue source that is countywide. The Pinellas Mobility Initiative is a program bought forward under the sponsorship of the MPO. This program will provide a significant transportation alternative with the use of a guideway technology connecting key points throughout the County. This system has been approved by the MPO to proceed into the preliminary engineering phase. As Pinellas County looks toward its future, this is the type of transportation that must be provided. In addition to this guideway system, there is the need to emphasize other forms of transit service. There needs to be not only the expansion of such service as the Gulf Beaches Trolley to provide such services as the connectivity from the Gulf Beaches to Downtown St. Petersburg, but also there is the need to provide premium express service to move the commuters and other non-leisure travelers to and from their destination that is. competitive with the automobile. Such services would set up a transition of use leading to that of the Guideway System. The appropriate steps should be taken to ensure not only that the funding is provided for the next phase of this guideway system, but that activities be initiated to identify the corridors that should be preserved for the system, and with development plans then focused along those corridors, thereby increasing the feasibility of that transit program. In that regard, the first phase of that system should include the corridor beginning in the Clearwater Beach/Downtown Clearwater area traveling east to the St. Petersburg/Clearwater Airport, and then south to the downtown St. Petersburg area. This would be followed by a second phase that would run from downtown St. Petersburg west to the Tyrone area and then north to downtown Clearwater, which will form a complete loop. There is the priority need to focus on Governance and the revenue source for this initiative. It makes sense that one agency should be responsible for mass transit at the trolley level, at the bus level, and the guideway level of service. This makes sense, not only from a governance and coordination of service perspective, but in terms of how the revenue may be applied. There is available to Pinellas County the use of a transit surtax, which is a sales tax of up to 1 percent that maybe applied if consent from a referendum is obtained. It has been concluded that this revenue source could support all that is envisioned with respect to mass transit requirements, and provide the funding needed for the other modes that might be in support of this system. The committee concludes that a new countywide form of transit governance is needed that has the ability to provide these services. The transit governance should take into account a membership that reflects the revenues that would be provided to the system. However the committee also concludes that the governance of that transit agency must be carefully designed so that the decisions are community based. This is extremely important in that this form of transportation has considerable interaction with communities and development that is along the system corridors. GULF BLVD ENHANCEMENT Gulf Blvd, which connects the 12 beach communities of the County, is a significant economic development feature. There are 5 million tourists a year that visit Pinellas County, and their primary objective in doing so is the Gulf Beaches. It must also be recognized that this same environmental feature is a significant attraction and amenity to the residents of the County. The third point in that regard is that there are many businesses that either locate to this area, or stay in this area due to the Gulf Beaches. A special Gulf beaches Trolley service has been instituted that has proved to be very successful and furthers the concept of the Gulf beaches as a unified corridor with connecting destinations. It is for these reasons that the committee believes Gulf Blvd. should be prioritized for enhancement as a corridor. This enhancement would include those various initiatives that come under the heading of livable community and quality of life provisions. This corridor should not only be attractive, but it should be functional for people to use. The corridor should not only be the subject of design features including way-finding signs, landscaping, streetscape, and utility under grounding, but also such community features as characteristic trolley service, bicycle friendly provisions, and pedestrian safety provisions are critical. These initiatives should all be followed with a common theme of design, function and communication. Gulf Blvd. must then be approached as not just a transportation corridor, but as an experiential corridor that is treated as a significant quality of life component of the County. Funding for this corridor should be viewed as a countywide responsibility but should be approached as a financial partnership with the 12 beach communities, where those communities provide a share of the funding. CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION AND STREETSCAPE A significant aspect to transportation is that of quality of life. Transportation improvements are made and provided for so that people can travel through the County pursuing their various destinations during the course of the day. This transportation purpose should be approached on a comprehensive basis. Attention should be given to how people make their trip, or their experience of the trip, rather than just getting people from one point to another. The corridors that people use should be landscaped, and include other streetscape provisions that make the people's experience in the corridor not only pleasing, but also non-aggravating. It is recognized that that people spend a considerable amount of their time traveling by car, transit, walking or by bike, that this time should be viewed as more than just functional. It is felt that if landscaping and streetscaping are incorporated into all of the transportation work, there will be two benefits. The first benefit is that it will be easier to implement the concept if it is approached on an across the board basis. The second point is there will be considerable savings if certain basic ingredients are incorporated in all projects. It is the conclusion that all the major corridors in the County should be subject to landscaping and streetscaping provisions, and that provisions with a revenue set-aside, should be made for the installation, maintenance, and ongoing upkeep of such a program. LIVABLE COMMUNITIES The approach to transportation must be broad based and comprehensive. Transportation can no longer be viewed as a subject that is of a single mode and which does not take into account interaction with development and the community. It is for this reason that the committee believes that as part of the transportation program the concept of a livable community should be embraced. There is now the public awareness and expectation of the fact that transportation should now include as a priority not just transit service, but also bicycle provisions, pedestrian provisions, and any other means whereby people can travel. This means that provisions need to be made for following the transit initiatives, the trailways plans, and the sidewalk and pedestrian initiatives that have been identified by the MPO, and local governments in their adopted plans. An example of this type of facility is the Pinellas Trail, which is a 15 foot wide paved non- vehicular corridor running through the entire urban area of the County. 100,000 people a month use this Trail with two thirds of those trips being for a work, school, shopping or social purpose. Another example of the growing awareness of the priority for these alternative modes is the 15 million dollar program underway to construct sidewalks and pedestrian crossings along the entire length of US 19, from Tarpon Springs to St. Petersburg. A third initiative highlighting this interest in the County is the MPO's Pedestrian Committee proposal to establish pedestrian safety zones where pedestrian movement would be prioritized over expedited vehicle movement in areas that justify such treatment. These programs show the growing focus that is being placed by the communities in the county on livable community provisions. Funding is needed to assist the communities and the county in responding to their need. In conjunction with this, the approach to development needs to be adjusted to be focused on a broader concept, rather than approaching each development in isolation. It has come to be recognized that a sense of place is important in that regard. A sense of place is really the responsibility of the community through its government or governments. How the public places including structures and open space, and connecting ways are defined, sets the basis for what the private sector does, not only in response to regulations, but also in response to this public interest or demand. As Pinellas County becomes more urbanized, this aspect of the development of a community becomes more of a priority. It is therefore the conclusion of the committee that in conjunction with the broad initiatives to provide transportation facilities, there must also be an initiative by the MPO, the County and local agencies that is supported by policy and funding that focuses on a sense of place and provides a way for C u [] 1 it i~ ~i I~ u it u 0 i [: people to move in anon-vehicular way within and through the communities of the County with a sense of place. TRANSPORTATION REVENUES It is recognized that additional revenues are needed to fulfill the public's expectation for a transportation system that maintains and expands on the quality of life of the residents and visitors. There are several options as to how these revenues can be pursued. Each of these revenue sources have different purpose expectations, different procedures, different effects upon individuals, and generate different amounts of ' money. Currently there is in State law the unused authority to levy an additional 6 cents on the sale of gasoline. Five of those cents falls under a procedure requiring an agreement among the County and the cities as to how the funds are allocated. The County Commission has the authority to establish up to 5 cents per gallon, but the distribution of these funds would then be governed by this interlocal agreement. The other part of that gas tax concerns one penny, which is called the 9`i' cent, and is subject to a different procedure. This other 1-cent must be approved by the BCC, but does not require an agreement between the cities and the County. The total annual revenue that can be derived from these sources is $21 million. In reviewing the law and its purpose it was concluded that this gas tax initiative should be project driven. That is, State law makes it clear that this option was created to respond to needs that were developed from a comprehensive plan. This should be the primary factor behind discussions on this tax. There has been discussion as to a percentage split between the cities and the County, but there has been no resolution on this ' question. It is the conclusion that the first determination should be what the gas tax is for in terms of projects, or programs, and once this is established then any split or division of funds should be based upon the furtherance of those projects or plans. ' Related to this gas tax option is the need to extend the current local 6 cents gas tax that is due to expire in 2007. Local agencies are reliant on 4 cents of these funds for the operation and maintenance of the local highway systems. This option should be extended and consideration should be given to applying the available 2 cents (currently tied to bonded indebt ness unti12007) to projects that would be proposed as part of the additional gas tax proposal. Consideration could also be given to bonding this revenue source to ' support roadway capacity or other projects. However, this proposal is qualified by the fact that this gas tax source has to date been used for the maintenance and operation of the County Highway System and is currently subject to an interlocal agreement between the cities and the County. Therefore, before it is assumed 2 cents can be applied to further bonded indebtedness or transportation improvements, consideration must first be given to the system maintenance requirements. Another revenue source is entitled The Transit Surtax. This is an up to 1 percent sales tax that can be authorized by the BCC through a referendum. This tax is for the purpose of a guideway transit system and related bus improvements and operations. A section of this law does allow for 25 percent of the revenues of ' this source to be used for non-transit. However, that provision does not apply in Pinellas County. It is concluded that the legislation should be fixed to make this provision available to this county. Since the transit surtax, if approved at its full amount, can generate 116 million dollars a year, this would be a very significant revenue source, and more than adequate to fund a proposed guideway system in the future. The transit surtax is a viable revenue source that should be considered by the County to fund the transit program. The other potential source for transportation projects is that of tolls. The public has not viewed the use of tolls in Pinellas County positively in the past. However, if an acceptable means of provision were presented, this could significantly help with the construction of highway facilities. But tolls must be carefully structured because if they do not collect revenues as expected, then replacement revenues are taken from the existing gas tax revenues for that area, which could affect the funding of other projects. The committee believes the use of the toll procedure should be explored for the Roosevelt /118`h Ave. Connector System, but caution would be appropriate due to the impact this would have on other revenue sources if it were not successfully carried out. Another option to consider is increasing toll on the Skyway Bridge, where there is considerably more control on trip diversions. The funds from this expanded Skyway Bridge Toll Program could be applied to other facilities designated to receive those funds, such as the Rooseveelt/118th Ave. Connector System. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The committee using as the basis the findings and facts stated in the previous section have drawn the following conclusions and recommendations. TRAFFIC CONTROLS There should be one County-wide entity in charge of the ITS portion traffic signal system ,which would encompass approximately 400 traffic signals within Pinellas County. Pinellas County is a logical lead agency for that purpose. The County should be responsible for the provision and operation of that system, and should be funded for that purpose. e The balance of the local traffic signals and traffic controls should remain under the jurisdiction of the local communities. With the County responsible, there should be an advisory procedure established, where local agencies can provide input to signal system operation. ROADWAY CAPACITY A continued priority should be placed on improvements to key roadways in the County that include US Hwy 19, Ulmerton Road, and Roosevelt/118th Ave. Connectors and Gandy Blvd. TRANSIT e Transit governance must be modified to function on a countywide basis encompassing all jurisdictions in the County . This governance should take into account the significant role Pinellas County will have in the revenue sources. The transit surtax should be considered as a viable revenue source for future transit improvements. o The Pinellas Mobility initiative should be funded for the next phase of development and in addition, measures should be taken to ensure that the identified corridors and related right of way are preserved for this future system. e Intermediate transit service improvements should be implemented concerning expanded trolley service and premium express bus service where the focus is on providing a service that attracts riders that have an alternative. GULF BLVD. ENHANCEMENT The Gulf Blvd enhancement project should be funded and implemented as a countywide project in partnership with the beach communities. Countywide funds should be assigned to this program with the understanding that the beach communities will provide matching funds for the improvements. CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION A program should be established and funded for corridor beautification and streetscape improvements throughout Pinellas County. G 0 lJ I~ ;] i~ u ~~ 0 0 0 n ~,~ C~ LIVABLE COMMUNITY • The MPO, the municipalities and the County should work together to restructure and emphasize the provision of transportation services that further the livable community initiative in Pinellas County. • This initiative would include focused transit service, the Trailways projects, bicycle provisions, pedestrian provisions and sense of place provisions for communities. TRANSPORTATION REVENUES • It is recognized that the transit surtax should be considered the viable revenue source for the Pinellas Mobility Initiative. With the referendum to be held at a later date, once the program has been defined in enough detail, to be taken to the public for a decision. • The Local Option Gas Tax of 5 cents and the 9th cent gas tax for a total of 6 cents should be instituted based upon a program of projects • The priorities for this ag, s tax funding should be capacity improvements to US 19, the capital portion of the ITS function of traffic controls, and Ulmerton Road. • Consideration should be given to bonding, utilizing the state infrastructure bank loan program and the leveraging of federal and state funds to accomplish these priorities at the earliest time. • The other priorities documented in this report deserve serious consideration for funding and should be the subject of further evaluations. • Other revenues should be considered such as toll revenues for capacity projects in this report that are not listed in the gas tax priorities. LIST OF APPENDIXES A. Subjects Considered B. Estimate of Program Costs C. Pinellas County Corridors Chart provided by FDOT D. Suggested Finance plan I 1 t it [] r APPENDIX A SUBJECTS CONSIDERED The Task Force convened and conducted a series of eight fact-finding sessions. That included the following subject areas: A. Alternative Transportation Revenues B. The MPO and the MPO's Long Range Plan C. US 19 Improvements D. City and County jurisdictional responsibility for traffic control E. Land Use and development pattern documentation. F. The Tampa Bay Partnership approach G. The State High Speed Rail program H. Pinellas Mobility Initiative I. The Transit Initiative of St. Petersburg and Clearwater J. The current GIS mapping and data system K. Liveable Community provisions. L. Trail and Bikeway provisions M. The PSTA program N. The St. Petersburg /Clearwater International Airport Program O. Pedestrian provision P. The current US Hwy 19 Improvement Program Q. Corridor Landscape and Beautification Initiatives R. The Gulf Blvd. Beautification/Enhancement program S. The CUTR program T. The Economic/Redevelopment Initiative U. Major unfunded transportation projects in Pinellas County. For each of these subjects, the Task Force invited guest speakers in to discuss with them in depth the subjects as they relate to Pinellas County. From these discussions, a concept evolved as to how these various subjects would fit together. It was clear that with each of these subjects, there were the questions of integration, or how agencies within Pinellas County work together. ESTIMATE OF PROGRAM COSTS ITS SIGNAL SYSTEM Capital Cost - $53 million 20 Year O & M - $48.6 million CAPACITY PROJECTS US Hwy 19 -Whitney Rd to SR 60 Roosevelt Connector Ulmerton Road Segments 118th Ave. Connector Gandy Blvd. MOBILITY INITIATIVE (Transit) Guideway System Trolley System Express Bus System GULF BLVD.ENHANCEMENT CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION LIVABLE COMMUNITY INITATIVE Trails Sidewalks Bike Lanes 119, 200, 000 392, 399, 220 62, 000, 000 250, 000, 000 138, 000, 000 $900,300,000 Capital O&M -Year $1,430M $10-15 M PE12M $5.5M $2.9M $20M $4.8M $75M -Full Treatment 50M -Limited Treatment $30 M* $68M Full MPO Plan $25M* $25M* * These numbers may be low and need further refinement and will need to be community based BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 COMMISSIONERS: KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL• CHAIRMAN SUSAN LATVALA -VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS JOHN MORRONI ROBERT B. STEWART BARBARA SHEEN TODD KENNTri'f. WELCH ~f~ti1 ~ %!ifi November 14, 2003 P[~NN9NG l~~P,~F~TMENT CITY ~F :t_~~,~~V4o~TcP To: Interlocal Service Delivery Agreement Work Group Member From: Gordon Beardslee, General Planning. Administrator Pinellas County Planning Department Subject: Latest Information on Service Delivery Project As you know, the County, the municipalities and special districts are required, by Chapter 163, F.S., to undertake a coordinated countywide effort to identify deficiencies or duplication in the provision, or delivery, of services. First though, we are required to collectively inventory all existing and proposed interlocal service delivery-related agreements that relate to the following subject areas:. Education, Potable. Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Public Safety, Parks and Recreation, and Transportation. The latest version of the Inventory of Agreements is attached for your consideration and review. Thanks for your input and edits. In addition to the Inventory, a separate list of service delivery deficiencies, gaps, or duplications is included. We may be contacting some of you individually to help fill in the blanks we still have in the Inventory. This list represents everything we have received so far, exactly as it was reported to us. The affected parties may be able to work out a resolution or agree to work toward a resolution on some of these items before the Report is mailed out in late December 2003. If this occurs, it may not be necessary to send all of these items in the list forward for review by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), or perhaps a proposed solution can be presented in the information that is sent to DCA. If no solution is readily attainable, the list would go up "as is" to DCA reflecting the specific delivery deficiency, gap, or duplication. The Pinellas Assembly task teams -are still meeting. You can review the latest information by going to: www.pinellascounty.org/pinellas_assembly. It looks like most of the Assembly task teams will complete their recommendations before January .2004. As we agreed at our September 15~' meeting, we will plan to send recommendations of the Recreation, Transportation, Law Enforcement, and Fire/EMS Task Forces as part of the submittal to DCA. We plan to send out the final draft of the actual Report later this month, incorporating the final Inventory, as well as the findings and results on delivery deficiencies, gaps, or duplications. We will then be looking for your administrative sign- off on the Report (via letter or a=mail) before we send the final Report to DCA. We will provide more information on this in our next mail out. Until then, if you have any questions, comments or ideas on the process or the information, feel free to contact me, Liz Freeman or Samantha Shorr-Zigante at (727) 464-8200. Check out the website at www.pinellascoun .or /Plan/interlocal F: IUSERSICENDOCSISERVICEDELIVERYPROJECTAug 0311Vovember 14.2003 Memo to WorkGroupMembers.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LOCATION: 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750, Clearwater. Florida 33755 TELEPHONE: (727) 464-6200 FAX: (727) 464-8201 PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 "Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" •Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace L•~ printed on recycled paper DRAFT Pinellas County Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory ~: g 1 ticr~icc ~--Party 1 ~, , ~ Partg2 Type of ~ Effective Date of ~- - ~ - ` Expiration Dat -~ ~_ DescriptionlPtotes r ' ~ Agreement . .Agreement __ d, _ ,. of Agreement. ~ , ,. ~ - ,. ,- ., Curtis Fundamental / Education Clearwater Clearwater Lease 1/1/97 12/31/2006 ML King Center. Original 25-year lease effective 1/1/72 expired 12/31/96. Comprehensive Automatic 10-year renewal through 2006 Education Dunedin Elementary School Dunedin 12/17/86 12/16/2006 Shared playfield-use agreement Education Dunedin I-ligh School Dunedin 1/22/97 Per agreement with Dunedin Jr Falcons (and city letter 1/22/97), city will annually inspect poles Education Norwood Elementary School Florida Department of Transportation Lease 3/9/03 3/8/2008 FDO7~ leases 12 acres to the Board to be used by Norwood staff for parking Education Largo High School Largo Agreement 1/26/99 1/25/2004 Field use and lighting installation agreement; first initiated in 1.994 Education Madeira Beach Gulf Beaches Lease 2/10/73 1/31/2016 Public Library Education Madeira Beach Govt Land SA-IV- Elementary School 482 letter Annual report (until 2003) of use, per instrument dated 1973 Palm Harbor Palm Harbor Education University High Community Agreement 12/17/01 12/16/2006 Initiated in 1996. Reciprocal field use with Palm Harbor Community Service School Service Agency Agency. Education Pinellas County School Pinellas County School Facilities 9/10/96 30 days notice Provides an alternative process and locational criteria for reviewing a proposed Board Siting Agreement public educational facility and site plan. Pinellas County School Joint-Use-Of- Education Board Pinellas County Facilities 8/28/98 8/27/2003 Except for disaster recovery efforts, all uses handled by additional-use forms Agreement Education Sandy Lane Elementary School pinellas County 12/10/02 12/9/2007 County's Air Quality Mgmt Division installed air monitoring station Education Tyrone Middle School Pinellas County 10/13/98 10/I 1/2003 County places monitoring station on portion of site Pinellas County School Education Board Wilcox Road Pinellas County Agreement 7/28/98 N/A Initiated in 1998. County can use site to deposit McKay Creek dredge spoils Site and 8th Avenue drainage pond excavation. No termination except by notice Education Pinellas County Library Cooperative All Cities ILA 09/10/01 09/30/13 Allows reciprocal use of library facilities and services to citizens. Education Pinellas County School B d Belleau School Facilities 12/17/96 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date oar Siting Agreement I I / 14/2003 ;.Service - Pa 1 - rty ~ Party'2 - Type oC, ~ Ctective,Date o E f ~~ Expiration Dat ' , ; _ DescriptSon/Notes - Agreement r • Agreement- '~ ~ot~Agreement Pinellas County School School Facilities Education Belleau Shores 12/17/96 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Pinellas County School School Facilities Education Clearwater 3/1 1/97 N/A Initiated in 1997 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Clearwater Facilities 1/1/Ol 12/31/2006 Yearly exhibit update required Board Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Dunedin Facilities 6/1/00 5/31/2005 Initiated in 1980 Board Agreement Education Pinellas County School Gulfport School Facilities 8/12/97 N/A Initiated in 1997 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Gulfport Facilities 2/9/03 2/8/2004 Initiated in 1996. Yearly letter renewal Board Agreement Pinellas County School Indian Rocks School Facilities Education Board Beach Siting Agreement 12/17/96 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Education Pinellas County School Indian Shores School Facilities 12/17/96 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Pinellas County School School Facilities Education Largo 9/24/96 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Largo Facilities 8/22/01 8/21/2006 Board Agreement Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Madeira Beach Facilities 6/10/01 6/9/2006 Uses now handled with additional use forms Board . Agreement Ptnellas County School Education Board Madeira Beach 4/25/01 4/24/2006 Bicentennial Park land used as park by City Pinellas County School North Redington School Facilities Education Board Beach Siting Agreement 12/17/96 N/A initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Joint-Use-Of- Pinellas County School Education Board Oldsmar Facilities 4/8/03 4/7/2004 Initiated in 1992. Renewed annually by letter Agreement Pinellas County School Pinellas County Blanket-Use Education Board Sheriffs Office Agreement 8/25/98 8/24/2003 Initiated in 1998. Uses added by additional-use forni. I I / 14/2(1(13 Service '~~`°. ,, ~~Pa 1~: !'tY a ~~~ pa z' ` ±'tY ~~"~ Type of" f(eetiveDateof E t, ; ` ExpirationDat _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ , DeseriptionllYotes , •,~_ ... , .,- r. inept ~ .: Agree Agree inept ment Agree ~ of Education Pinellas County School Redingion Beach School Facilities 12/17/96 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Pinellas County School Joint-Use-Of- Education Board Safety Harbor Facilities 4/25/03 4/24/2004 Initiated in 1990. Annual renewal by letter Agreement Education Pinellas County School Safety Harbor School Facilities 10/22/97 N/A Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Pinellas County School Joint-Use-Of- Education Board Seminole Facilities 3/11/02 3/10/2007 Initiated in 1997. Agreement Education Pinellas County School South Pasadena School Facilities 12/17/96 Initiated in 1996 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Education Pinellas County School St. Petersburg School Facilities 1/13/98 Initiated in 1998 w/no expiration date Board Siting Agreement Education Pinellas County School Board St. Petersburg Youth concert Co-Sponsorship Education Pinellas Count School y St. Petersburg Joint-Use-Of- Facilities 6/1/01 5/31/2006 Facilities include schools (gymnasiums, athletic facilities, parking lots) and Board Agreement parks, swimming pools, recreation centers, athletic facilities, and the Colisieum. Pinellas County School St. Petersburg Joint-Use-Of- Education Board College Facilities 9/1/02 8/31/2007 Agreement Education Pinellas County School SWFWMD and g/4/76 N/A Sawgrass Lake. Automatically renews yearly w/no formal expiration date. Board Pinellas Count Y School Board provides resource teacher. Education Pinellas Coun School ~ Tarpon Springs Joint-Use-Of- Facilities 6/14/00 6/13/2005 Initiated in 1989. (Reminder-add P.D. communications device on TSHS Board Agreement football field when the exhibit is renewed) Pinellas County School Joint-Use-Of- Education Board USF Facilities 9/12/00 9/11/2005 Joint use of facilities agreement, first initiated 9/12/91 Agreement Education Pinellas County School Board Pinellas Park Joint Use Agreement 09/11/03 5 years Umbrella agreement with Pinellas County School Board for facility use. Pinellas County School School Board not required to comply with city permitting and siting Education Board Pinellas Park ILA 02/l0/00 N/A requirements so long as School Board complies with Florida Dept. of Education permitting and siting and Countywide Future Land Use I I / 14/2003 Ser`vsce '~~ Party 1 ''' ` ' party 2 ~ ` Typeo - f ", °, Effects 've Date of Exf i ra Non Dat Description/Notes ' " x,, >, - ... A reesnent ~ ,.; A reement ' A o r Bement - Pinellas County, Clearwater, Dunedin, Gulfport, Largo, Madeira Beach, Education Oldsmar, Pinellas Park, Pinellas County ILA 5/1/03 N/A Joint School Board/ Local Government Coordination per Section 163.31777, Safety Harbor, School Board Florida Statutes, "1906" Agreement. Seminole, St. Petersburg, St. Pete Beach, and Tarpon Springs Education Pinellas Park Pinellas Park Agreement 9/9/92 9/8/2032 A 25-year review of agreement due in 2017 Elementary Education Countryside High Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 12/9/97 Initiated in 1997, w/no expiration date. PSTA has bus shelter on site School Transit Authority Education Largo High School Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 12/9/97 N/A Initiated in 1997, w/no expiration date. PSTA has bus shelter on site Transit Authority Education PTEC (Clearwater) Pinellas Suncoast Agreement 12/17/96 N/A Initiated in 1996, no expiration date PS"fA has bus shelter on site Transit Authority Education PTEC (St Petersburg) Pinellas Suncoast ' Agreement 7/24/96 N/A initiated in 1996 w/no specific termination date Transit Authority Oldsmar Elementary Southwest Florida Education School Water Management 8/10/98 8/9/2003 Monitor Wells. Initiated in 1988 District Education Azalea Middle School St. Petersburg Agreement 2/8/84 N/A Library agreement. No expiration date Education Campbell Park Elementary School St. Petersburg Agreement 1/1/02 12/31/2100 Okayed by City referendum Parcel 1 for rec; parcel 2 for parking Education Lakewood High School St. Petersburg Agreement 1/1/99 12/31/2008 City developed shared-use baseball fields on the southeast comer of the school site 30 days written notice before 8/1 Preceptor Program allows students to obtain the necessary clinical and hands- Education St. Petersburg College Madeira Beach 6/16/99 on experience in order to meet the requirements of the EMS program and Fire of any given Dept continuing education year Tarpon Springs Education Fundamental Tarpon Springs 8/23/00 8/22/2005 Initiated in 1995. City uses east 23 feet of school site. Elementary School Education Tarpon Springs High Tarpon Springs Agreement 2/24/03 2/23/2008 Initiated in 1993. City installed lighting, rec teams get use of baseball (field. 60 School day intent notice due in December 2002 I I / 13/2003 .. ~` ~~ Serv~.e ... }. ~ ` x, '' Patty 1 ~ ~ Party 2 " Typenf ~- EffeMwe Date of .. Expiration Dat ~ `= ~ '~~ ~~ ~~` :'} Description/Notes~ _ , Agreennent ':Agreement ofAgreement~ __ P x,' Education University of South Pinellas Park MOU 05/25/00 30 days written Pinellas Park will host a representative from the Small Business Development Florida notice Center to assist local businesses obtain federal, state, and local contracts. Education University of South pinellas Park MOU 04/02/02 30 days written Students from the University of South Florida are able to complete an Florida notice internship in Health and Wellness in the Pinellas Park Fire Department. Education Walter Pownall Service Pinellas Park Initiated in 1995. R/W agreement, no expiration date. Will need to periodically Center monitor status Education Woodlawn Elementary St. Petersburg 8/13/87 8/12/2086 City leased 8.1 acres to the Board to permit an upgrade to a full-sized school School • ... _ _ „ .. ~ .. - e ,t .;- ._ 10/1/1988 (plus Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Largo ILA 10/1/83 automatic To create a common sanitary sewer service boundary. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor [LA 10/22/76 35 years Clearwater to treat wastewater from Safety Harbor. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safely Harbor lLA 8/1/88 7/31/2018 Parties had 3 previous contracts; this agreement permits Safety Harbor to increase its sewage capacity at the Clearwater Treatment Plant. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor 1LA 1 l/1/99 N/A Clearwater is providing wastewater treatement; Safety Harbor to regulate discharges to sewer system by adopting and enforcing sewer regulations. 11/28/84 (plus 5 Sanitary Sewer Dunedin Clearwater ILA 1 (/28/79 automatic To define the boundaries of wholesale and retail sanitary sewer service areas. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 6/23/00 10 years Largo to service parts of St. Petersburg. Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 8/21/1997 8/21/2007 Largo to provide reclaimed water to Carillon Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg 1LA 12/7/1983 N/A Provisions for sewer service, utilities, public services, annexation and development in Roosevelt triangle and 28th St. N. condor Sanitary Sewer Largo Pinellas Park ILA 10/18/2001 N/A Largo purchase of Trac[ A sewer system from Pinellas Park Clarifies that St. Petersburg shall provide service to Tract A-I when they have Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg Amendment 2/21/2003 10 years the capacity to serve, but not later than 06/30/2010, also clarifies amounts due to Largo and services provided by St. Petersburg Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County and Largo ILA 09/03/99 To define boundaries of sanitary sewer services for properties. ConFlict pinellas Park resolution for voluntary annexation into city. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Belleau [LA Spring 2003 N/A Belleau turns over its entire sewer system infrastructure to the County. No expiration date. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Belleau Beach [LA 9/25/01 25 years Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. 11/14/2003 Sernee ' ~ ~~ Psrty 1 ~" ~ -~- Party 2 . Type of , ~ . ... ~- m ~ Effective Date of ~~ - ..A e Eapiratioa Dat ~. _~ ~ f A r ; ,.' Description/Notes . a _ ~ s,_- .. Agree ent . gre ment _. o g eement Can be terminated by Ordinance and 9/4/80 (Ord.) the City with 60 Provides for Greenbrier Service Area and for Dunedin to provide sewer service Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Dunedin days notice and to the service area. Pinellas County to bill customers for sewer service. No ILA 3/2/1982 (ILA) by the County expiration date. with 6 months notice Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Indian Rocks ILA 9/25/01 25 years Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. Beach Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Indian Shores Agreement 10/12/82 N/A Pinellas purchased Indian Shores sanitary sewer system. Madeira Beach pays portion of debt on South Cross Bayou Pollution Control Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Madeira Beach [LA 7/22/69 30 years Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. 03/01 /26 termination 25 years after the first 2 years. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Madeira Beach 3/2/01 City may Wastewater transmission, treatment and disposal services terminate the Agreement with 180 days written notice Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Madeira Beach 3/13/79 2004 Repay Pinellas County for the cost of constructing modified gravity flow sewer, metering facilities and appurtenances North Redington North Redington Beach to pay portion of the debt on the South Cross Bayou Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Beach ILA 3/14/72 30 years Pollution Control Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. Northeast Pinellas County Sewer and Waste Authority, Inc. also signed Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 12/l 1/79 20 years agreement. Oldsmar treats wastewater for County. This agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 3/19/98 20 years Service areas established. Oldsmar agrees to treat 550,000 Bpd. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 03/01/01 03/01/26 25 year agreement to accept and treat wastewater from Pinellas Park. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park [LA 08/12/03 08/12/28 Pinellas County will treat wastewater generated by Pinellas Park. City agrees that should a minimum of 10 potential customers served by an Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 05/02/72 N/A individual sewer line in its designated service area want the City to provide sewer and the City does not do so within 6 months, County can provide sewer, then adjust their service boundary to show new area. I I / 14/2003 Sernce,~ ~ ~~y "~ Party 1 Party.2 Type o[ - A r meot °Effechve Date of ._.: ~-~'Agr c t ~ Eap~ration Dat ~ fA r nt - -. Description/Notes , ~ ~.,~ . g ~e e men o eeme g Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Potable pinellas County Pinellas Park Letter of 09/25/00 N/A City will assist County in locating city-owned utilities for County projects when Water, Solid Understanding requested. Waste Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 04/20/97 60 days written Allows for County charges of sewer services on water bills of Pinellas Park notice residents. Charges residents who use city water and County sewer. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Redington Shores ILA 3/l/01 2S years County to treat the Town's wastewater. Report/ A report was published in 1980 called the Clenn Water Act 20/ Facilities Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Safety Harbor Analysis 1980 N/A Plnn. As a result of that report, Safety Harbor's sanitary sewer service area boundaries were established. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County St. Petersburg [LA 6/26/64 40 years St. Petersburg will treat wastewater from unincorporated areas of [he County - Bear Creek. Expires next year. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 11/11/87 mutual County requested to pump sewage wastes created in Ft. De Solo Park to the agreement City for treatment. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Ta on Springs ILA 8/8/78 1/1/2000 To define the boundaries of sanitary sewer service ar<:~~s. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County and Pinellas Park ILA 07/11/00 N/A Establishes "Annexation Boundary Line" for Largo, Pinellas Park, and Largo annexation areas. Also establishes the Largo sanitary sewer service area. Sanitary.Sewer St. Petersburg Gulfport Amendment 2/10/70 S years Gulfport was transporting wastewater to St. Petersburg from unincorporated areas it intended to annex to (there is 1 agreement and 2 amendments for this). Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 3/12/97 30 years St. Petersburg to provide wastewater treatment to the parts of Gateway Center within Pinellas Park (Gateway Center Development). Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 03/01/02 03/O1/OS 3 year agreement to accept and treat wastewater from Pinellas Park. Sanitary Sewer Treatment Agreement. Provide sanitary sewer service for Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 03/12/87 30 years Gateway Center Development. Pinellas Park is retailer of sewage service for Gateway and St. Pete provides wholesale treatment not to exceed 500,000 GPD. Inter jurisdictional Pre-treatment Agreement where Pinellas Park agrees to Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 03/23/00 Renewed every 3 adopt an ordinance that is no less stringent than St. Petersburg's. St. Petersburg years acts as agent for Pinellas Park for administering technical aid and administrative aspects for Pinellas Park Sewer. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg South Pasadena ILA 12/27/74 12/27/2004 South Pasadena will pay St. Petersburg for transmission of sanitary sewage. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg St. Pete Beach ILA 2/19/85 St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from St. Pete Beach at the Northwest Treatment Plant. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Treasure Island ILA 1/3/84 1/3/2009 St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from Treasure Island at the Northwest Treatment Plant. .. a.W.. 'x ~ ... ~ - „~ ~ ,. ,. ~~ .,..~ v ~ .. ~ '.. ~ ~ ., - . .. v ~....,.,..~, - ,~... ,.._ Y, ~_, ....~.M-...,._..<.._m_ _, ... .._ ..-. .. I 1 / 14/2003 ~ ~ 'Type of ~ Effective Date of Expirafioo Dat ~ ~ "~ _ Service _ -- Party 1 1 ~ Part} 2 ,. ~ -.. -Agreements- . F Agreement ~ ' of Agreement ,Description%Notes ,, Public Safety Bayfront Medical Pinellas County Agreement 1/29/01 9/30/2004 High Risk Perinatal Transport Center and LifeFleet Public Safety Belleau Bluffs Fire Largo Fire MOU 2/2/96 N/A Fire Department First Responder Agencies. Does not expire. Dept Department Public Safety Clearwater Pinellas Park Agreement 05/09/69 60 days written Mutual aid agreement for fire protection services. notice Public Safety Homestead Pinellas Park Agreement 08/24/92 N/A Mutual aid agreement for disaster recovery services. Public Safety Largo Pinellas Park Agreement 06/23/77 30 days written Mutual aid agreement for fire protection services. notice Public Safety Seminole Pinellas Park Agreement 05/22/80 60 days written Mutual aid agreement for fire protection services. notice St. Petersburg Junior St. Petersburg Junior College (now known as St. Petersburg College) allows Public Safety College District Board Pinellas Park ILA 08/29/85 N/A City to use facility located at 7200 66th Street for sheltering families of City of Trustees employees who are required to work during emergencies. St. Petersburg Junior St. Petersburg Junior College (now known as St. Petersburg College) EMS Public Safety College District Board Pinellas Park lLA 08/01/98 O8/01/OS students may ride along with Pinellas Park EMS units to gain hands-on of Trustees experience. Public Safety Florida Department of Pinellas Park Agreement 03/20/00 45 days written Allows Pinellas Park Police Department to access the Florida Crime Law Enforcement Police Department notice Information Center and NCIC. Florida Department of Community Affairs - upon 60 day Public Safety Division of Emergency Madeira Beach 2/6/01 notice by the Catastrophic Disaster Response and Recovery Management City to withdraw Public Safety Kenneth City Lealman Fire & Agreement 10/1/02 09/30/05 Lealman Fire & Rescue, Inc. to provide fire protection services to Kenneth City Rescue, Inc. (replaced original agreement dated 5/9/96). Palm Harbor Special When Dunedin annexes, the subject properties are no longer part of the Palm Public Safety Fire Control and Dunedin ILA 10/1/86 Until otherwise Harbor Fire District. After annexation, Palm Flarbor stops providing primary Rescue District modified service and Dunedin takes over. This interlocal is required by Palm Harbor Fire District's charter. Palm Harbor Special Public Safety Fire Control and Pinellas County Traffic LOU 6/1/00 N/A Installation and maintainence of Opticom preemption equipment. Rescue District Palm Harbor Special Pinellas County Public Safely Fire Control and Emergency LOU 12/13/00 N/A To provide personnel for hazardous materials response. Rescue District Management Palm Harbor Special Public Safety Fire Control and Pinellas County ILA 6/21/01 N/A Student-Ride-Along as part of medical program at Palm Harbor University Rescue District School Board liigh School. I I / 14/2003 -~ .. Service , P9rty 1 ': , ,.. Pprtv~~ 2 ~~~. TYPe o[ Effective Date of ~ Expirohon Dat • , - ~ ~ ~ ' DcscriptinnllVnt~ ' .,; . ~; , r ~~ ~ ,, Z ~~ greement A Agreement ~vf Agreement - _ .,. ~ Tarpon Springs, South Pasadena, Safety Harbor, Public Safety Pinellas County Belleair Bluffs, Agreement 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Fire protection services agreement to provide fire services for unincorporated Dunedin, Pinellas fire district areas. Provides for payment for services. Park, Seminole, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Largo State of Florida, Automatic Public Safety Pinellas County Division of Agreement 5/12/92 Renewal for 1 Administrative year terms until Hearings canceled Public Safety Pinellas County Financial Credit Agreement 6/21/94 l 1/29/2005 Collection Services. Services On-Line Medical Control for all First Responders and ambulance activities. Public Safety Pinellas County All Hospitals Contract 3/1/88 4/30/1998 System remains in place and is functioning. New agreement will be executed to provide funding of a new system in [he future. Public Safety Pinellas County Belleair Agreement 3/13/97 9/30/2007 Agreement establishes Basic Life Support (BLS) First Responder duties. Public Safety Pinellas County Belleair Bluffs Agreement 1/10/97 9/30/2007 Agreement establishes Basic Life Support (BLS) First Responder duties. Public Safely Pinellas County Eckerd College, Agreement 3/10/99 9/30/2008 Agreement establishes Basic Life Support (BLS) First Responder and search Inc. and rescue responsibilities. I I / 14/2003 y S r ' ~~- = }. ~ •Type~of five Date of ~ Expiration Dat ~ e vice , ' ~ Pa 1 rty ~~ Pa 2 ; ., rty `" _. ~ Agreement _ Ag reemeat a of Agreement Descrti ption/Notes = - 18 entities (Belleau, Clearwater, Dunedin, East Lake Tarpon, Gulfport, Pinellas Suncoast, Largo, Lealman, Madeira Beach, St. Petersburg - Public Safety Pinellas County Oldsmar, Palm Agreement 10/1/98 9/30/2007 EMS First Responder Agreements Harbor, Pinellas All Others - Park,Safety 10/1/97 Harbor, St. Pete Beach, St. Petersburg, Seminole South Pasadena, Tarpon Springs and Treasure Island Public Safety Pinellas County Geac Pub lc Safety, Agreement 7/16/97 Ambulance billing software maintenance and support i Automatic Public Safety Pinellas County Hospice of the Contract 9/1/96 Renewal each Ambulance services. Florida Suncoast January 1, unless terminated 9/30/2004 (can Public Safety Pinellas County LifeFleet Agreement 10/1/99 be renewed for To provide exclusive ambulance transport service for emergency and non- two consecutive emergency patients. 3 year terms) Emergency Public Safety Pinellas County Medical Services Agreement 12/30/00 12/29/2003 Medical Direction Service. In the process of being extended for one year. Group, Inc. Contract states two one-year extensions may be exercised. Public Safety Pinellas County Bank of America Agreement 10/1/Ol 9/30/2007 Credit card service agreement which allows ambulance bills to be charged to credit cards. Public Safety Pinellas County Pinpoint Contract 4/17/03 Automatic Renewal each Annual maintenance and support for ambulance services patient billing Technologies, lnc. software. fiscal year Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg Agreement 10/1/03 9/30/2006 Agreement establishes on-going Continuing Medical Education (CME) training College for all 1,350 personnel in the EMS system 10 I I / 14/2003 .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ Se i ~ P ~, .:~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ^'-Type~of ' . EffeMiveDateof Er<p~ratioo Dat ;~"~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ' ~ rv ce ,~ f_ arty 1 • . Party 2 . ~~ 4 ..Agreement -,. ~ ~~' Agreement ~, ~ofAgreeroent - . r ~~ ;Description/Notes ° ~, :fi s~~~ Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg- MOU 3/14/97 N/A Provides direction for BLS services at the airport. Does not expire. Clearwater Airport Public Safety Pinellas County St. Pete Beach Agreement 10/1/97 9/30/2007 Establishes municipal ambulance subscription plan in the city for all residents. Public Safety Pinellas County Social Services Agreement 11/12/93 N/A Comprehensive Care Program. Does not expire. Public Safety Pinellas County Superior Asset Inc. Agreement 6/21/94 11/29/2005 Collection services. Public Safety Pinellas County Danton Agreement 8/l 1/03 11/10/2003 Temporary printing services. Public Safety Pinellas County Axis Agreement 10/1/99 9/30/2004 GEAC printing. Public Safety Pinellas County David Werfel Agreement 1/1/02 12/31/2005 Compliance audit/newsletter. Public Safety Pinellas County SMART Agreement 6/23/03 6/22/2008 Duplication for attorney requests. All Municipalities Public Safety Pinellas County and Fire Service Agreement 10/16/90 Automatic aid agreement in effect while Pinellas County BCC provides Districts emergency communication services to fire service providers. Public Safety Pinellas County East Lake Fire & ILA 10/1/97 Automatic Fire Protection Services for the Brooker Creek Preserve area and provides Rescue, Inc. annual renewal firefighting foam and equipment Public Safety Pinellas County Oldsmar Fire ILA 5/27/97 Automatic Fire Protection Services for the Brooker Creek Preserve area and provides Department annual renewal firefighting foam and equipment Public Safety Pinellas County Dunedin I.,ease 5/17/01 5/16/2021 Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called anywhere in the County Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park Lease 9/11/01 9/10/2021 Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called anywhere in the County Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg Lease l0/] 5/02 10/14/2022 Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called anywhere in the County Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 10/2/00 10/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Gandy Fire Protection District Public Safety Pinellas County Largo -LA 10/14/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Highpoint Fire Protection District. Public Safety Pinellas County Largo [LMAA 3/23/1999 1/1/2005 Mutual aid assistance for Police services Florida Department Public Safety Pinellas County of Community Grant 1/28/98 1/28/1999 Hazard Mitigation Grant used to install hurricane shutters and window film on Affairs Sunstar building Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park [LA 7/31/03 9/30/2003 City to provide fire inspection and plan review services in the Gandy Fire Protection District. Public Safety Pinellas County South Pasadena 1LA 12/19/02 9/30/2003 City to provide fire inspection and plan review services in the Tierra Verde Fire Protection District. Lealman Special Public Safety Pinellas County Fire Control ILA 7/15/02 12/31/2003 Agreement to build a fire station in Lealman Park and for the County provide District up to $2.2 million for the project 11 / 14/2003 P, ` ~ Servlcc Party 1 ~ Party 2. =~ Type~ot ~ rcement ~A Et[ectrveD~atcof, 'A reement ~ Eip~ratiou_Dat _ 'of Agreement' -, Description/Notes ~. . -~ z , ~.,_. ~, . .- , .. r g ~ ~ .., g - e '..: ,. . ,. ~- '.. b Resolution authorizing the Quit Claim deed for Lealman property to be Lealman Special transferred to new special fire control district along with Assignment of Closest Public Safety Pinellas County Fire Control Resolution 9/18/OI Unit Response Agreement, Bill of Sale of all assets and amendment to Fire District Protection Services Agreement Lease of fire station property on Whitney Road to City of Largo for Fire Public Safety Pinellas County Largo Cease Protection Services in the F{ighpoint Fire Protection District Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park Lease 1 1/8/90 9/30/1991 Lease of fire station property on Evergreen Avenue to City of Pinellas Park for Fire Protection Services in the Highpoint Fire Protection District 5 years plus 15 Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA Proposed one-year terms Lease of property and operations agreement for the County's centralized Fire College possible 20 more and Public Safety training facility years All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and Pasco ILA Proposed N/A and major cities County All fire agencies in Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Elillsborough and major cities County All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and City o ILA Proposed N/A and major cities Tampa All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and ILA Proposed N/A and major cities Manatee County All fire agencies in Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with neighboring counties Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas and City o ILA Proposed N/A and major cities Bradenton Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 10/1/00 9/30/2003 City agrees to provide Fire Protection Services for Fort Desoto Park Public Safety Pinellas County St. Petersburg Lease Proposed N/A Lease of new Tierra Verde fire station and property for the city to use to provide Fire Protection Services for the unincorporated Tierra Verde area Public Safety Pinellas County Largo and Pinellas Resolution 12/20/83 N/A Expansion of Largo and Pinellas Park Fire Service areas into the Elighpoint Fire Park Protection District East Lake Fire & To define the obligations and responsibilities of the parties with respect to the Public Safety Pinellas County Agreement 10/14/99 90 days notice provision of fire protection services in the unincorporated Gast Lake areas of Rescue, Inc. the County. Public Safety Pinellas County Fire Districts Resolution N/A Creates various fire districts (District resolutions on file). Public Safety Pinellas County Madeira Beach ILA 5/2/89 upon 90 days Automatic Aid -Closest Unit Response Agreement written voice I t/14/20U1 ,. - Servrcc , ~ '` _ Party 1 ,* -. Party 2 , • Type of '. ' E ffective Date of Expiration Dat .. ~ ' DescriptionlrTotes § ,: x - . , _ Agreement : :Agreement ofAgreemeot 09/30/2007 or may be terminated by the Pinellas County Emergency Public Safety Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 10/1/97 Medical Service ALS (Advanced Life Support) First Responder for cause upon 20 day notice to City Manager or may be terminated by the City upon 6 month notice Public Safety Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 6/25/05 upon 45 day Building Dept Services Agreement: Flood Protection, Permitting and written notice Inspections Public Safety Pinellas County Kenneth City IL.A 10/15/02 Department of Justice Coordination -Baker Act Transport Act for M inors. Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 07/31/03 07/31/08 To provide fire protection services to a specific area along Gandy Boulevard. Public Safety Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 03/09/82 N/A City to provide fire protection services to the Pinellas County Solid Waste Incinerator. Public Safety Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 1/1/00 12/31/2004 Mutual aid agreement for law enforcement agency. Public Safety Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA Enforce Geographic Information System -sharing information. Pinellas County & Public Safety Adult Protective Pinellas Park ILA 05/27/03 30 days written Coordinate services of law enforcement agency within Pinellas Park of abuse Investigations notice reports involving criminal and adult protective allegations. Pinellas County 9/30/07 Public Safety Emergency Medical Pinellas Park ILA 09/03/97 (renewed each Define the responsibilities for first-responder/ closest unit response to provide Services Authority year) medical services Public Safety Pinellas Count Fire y Pinellas Park ILA 01/01/91 9/30/94 (possibly Pinellas Park to provide fire protection services to residents of unincorporated Protection Authority area of High Point. renewed) 13 1 1 / 14/2003 Service Party l Party Z ~ Type of Effective Date of ~ Expiration I)at a - Description/Notes ,, , ,, - ,. - Agreement , ..Agreement - of A~reemenY - ~ - r . .~ , .r Belleair Bluffs, Indian Rocks Beach, Madeira Beach, North Redington Beach, Oldsmar, Safety 9/30/2003 " Public Safety Pinellas County Sherif ILA 10/1/02 renewed fo provide law enforcement services. Harbor, Seminole, Dunedin, South annually Pasadena, Pinellas Park, Redington Beach, Kenneth City Public Safety Pinellas County Sherif Pinellas Park I[.A 07/07/00 Ol/Ol/OS Pinellas Park and Pinellas County Sheriff agree to request and render law enforcement assistance during emergencies. Pinellas County Sheri ft Child Protection Investigations Division to coordinate with law enforcement Public Safety & Cities Pinellas Park MOU 03/08/00 OI/Ol/OS agencies for child abuse, neglect, and abandonment investigations. Also outlines standard protocol. Public Safety Safety Harbor Pinellas County 6/23/1998 expired Local Mitigation Strategy; Workgroup in effect per Resoulution 99-14 Public Safety Safety Harbor DRC, Inc. 8/18/2003 5 years Debris management, disaster recovery services 09/30/2009 renewable for additional 10 years, termination upon mutual consent with 90 loin[ Interlocal to provide Fire Suppression and other Emergency and Non- public Safety Seminole Madeira Beach ILA 10/19/99 emergency services to North Redington Beach, Redington Beach, and day notice, Redington Shores agreement will remain in effect for a period of 6 month after mutually agreed termination date I I / 14/2003 Serv~ce~~ 7 ~ ~ ...Party 1 '.,'' party 2 Type of ;- ~~ Effective Date of _~s .e, Ezp~ration Da ~, o i Devcription/Notes - _ ~ +• Agreemeot lgreement ,~ fAl;recn~e~2t, ~ _ _ _ 01 /04/ 10 renewable for additional 10 years, termination upon mutual Public Safety Seminole Madeira Beach [LA 1/5/00 consent with 90 Join[ lnterlocal to provide Fire Suppression and EMS services to North day notice, Redington Beach, Redington Beach, and Redington Shores agreement will remain in effect for a period of 6 month after mutually agreed termination date Public Safety St. Petersburg Kenneth City Contract 1996 Provide services for Legal Service Forfeiture Act. St. Petersburg- Public Safety .Clearwater Pinellas Park Agreement 12/12/98 04/01/05 To provide assistance to the St. Petersburg-Clearwater Intemational Airport International Airport Public Safety State of Florida Kenneth City ILA 1/2/03 Department of Children and Families [nvestigation Assistance. Public Safety Florida De artment of p All Cities and Independent Fire Agreement 12/12/01 60 days written Statewide mutual aid agreement - to get reimbursed for expenses during Community Affairs Districts notice disaster operations. Public Safety Florida Department of Community Affairs Pinellas Park Agreement 06/30/03 06/30/05 To provide and receive assistance to and from other state agencies. . ., -~_ - , : ; .. { By law, the County has the duty to dispose of solid waste. There is no need for Solid Waste Pinellas County All Cities Court Judgment N/A N/A lnterlocal agreements. As for solid waste collection, cities can implement their own collection and delivery services to the County's disposal facilities. Agreement regarding recycling grants. Parties agree to continue to work Solid Waste Pinellas County All Cities ILA 6/25/99 9/30/2004 together to reach the goals of the Pinellas County Recycling Committee. The agreement details how grant money, if any, will be distributed and for what uses. 9/30/84 with County constructed a Solid Waste Resource Recovery Complex in Pinellas Solid Waste Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 03/09/82 automatic 2 year Park; Pinellas Park to provide the required fire protection services for the renewals Complex. Solid Waste Safety Harbor Waste Management 10/1/Ol 3 years Curbside Recycling Contract 11/14/2003 Service " ~~ , Party l ' Party 2 . -Type of ~ Agrceroent Effective Date of -~ ~~ - Agreerirent Expiration Aa - ~ of Agreement - a f Description/Notes . ~> , Solid Waste Kenneth City Waste Managemen Contract 12/15/00 12/15/03 Curbside pickup and recycling Southwest Florida Solid Waste Water Management Madeira Beach Grant 10/31/01 6/30/2003 Grant for Stormwater System C-2 thru C-5 along 140th Ave District >:. ~ Drainage Treasure Island Madeira Beach summer 2003 summer 2004 Street Sweeping All Pinellas County _ Pinellas, all cities, FDOT, and Pinellas Park Water Management District Drainage Pinellas County 6/16/2005 providing for joint control of pollutants from public or private lands within Municipalities respective jurisdictions Drainage Pinellas County Safety Harbor 3/29/1994 9/30/2008 NPDES monitoring Pinellas County and Draina a g Clearwater Safet Harbor y 10/25/1994 ex fired p Alli ator Basin draina e stud s ecific ro ects not bud eted. g g y' p p J g All Municipalities Drainage Pinellas County (except St. lLA 04/17/03 09/30/08 Design and implementation of water quality monitoring program for NPDES Petersburg) Permit as part of County's MS4. Drainage Pinellas Park Water pinellas Park ILA 10/28/93 Project Drainage improvements to 82nd Avenue from 52nd Street North to 66th Street Management District Completion North. OS/1 I/03 or when Agreement Pinellas County and is fully Provides for the construction of drainage improvements along the Pinellas "frail Drainage Belleau Largo ILA 5/11/2000 performed, southward from Fairview Park across Ponce de Leon Blvd. to 16th Avenue whichever N.W. occurs first Potable Water Pinellas County Oldsmar Agreement 12/11/70 5/14/2005 Purchase potable water from Pinellas County Potable Water Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 12/28/99 5/14/2005 0.5-1.0 mgd wholesale agreement. This water would be used by Oldsmar to service area outlined in uninco orated area. Potable Water Pinellas County Safety Harbor ILA 9/29/2002 5 years Retail service area, wholesale purchase agreement Potable Water Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 10/6/92 5 years 1 mgd max wholesale agreement to service unincorporated area. The minimum is I mg/month. Potable Water Pinellas County Tarpon Springs ILA 12/1/92 5 years 1.65-4.0 mgd wholesale agreement. Potable Water Pinellas County Pinellas Park IL.A 1/28/88 20 years 3.7-7.5 mgd wholesale agreement. Potable Water Pinellas County Largo ILA 1/25/72 N/A Agreement allowing Pinellas County to operate Largo's water system. Potable Water Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 3/19/76 30 years Expires 9/30/05. This is a 10 mgd wholesale agreement. Potable Water Pinellas County Kenneth City Resolution N/A N/A Resolution approving the purchase of water for the "Town from Pinellas County. 11/14/2003 ~~ Serti~ce ~ ~Parh t :~ - - ~ ~ Party 2 ~~ -. k`~~,*~`Pe~ of ~ ,.; A - , reetncnt Effect-ve Date of >a> A ee t Eip-ration Datr ~ ~ fAg e t _. ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - ~ r ~' - ~ ~ Descnptioh/Notes` ~ ,~ r .-, g ~ gr meo r en-rn o .. This agreement transfers the right to operate Largo's existing water system to Potable Water Pinellas County Largo ILA 10/1/75 N/A Pinellas County. The County will pay Largo for outstanding debt and debt serviced. Potable Water Pinellas County Belleau lLA 5/7/96 5 years This is an agreement for up to 1 mgd of "emergency service (wholesale)." "fhe new agreement is an emergency exchange service. upon 60 day Water System Billing to include collection for City Services of sanitary system, Potable Water Pinellas County Madeira Beach 6/23/97 refuse collection, and stormwater fee on the same bill as that of the County written notice water services Potable Water Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 11/12/92 N/A Allows Pinellas County to distribute water conservation kits to 21,541 households in Pinellas Park. Potable Water Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 10/25/90 30 days written Agreement to allow water and sewer service turn-off between city and county. notice Unanimous consent or upon direction of 2 Pinellas County, Pasco member Count , Hillsborou h Y g governments if a Establishes Tampa Bay Water (formerly known as the West Coast Regional Potable Water County, St. Petersburg, Tampa Bay Water ILA 10/1/98 material Water Supply Authority) who is the sole wholesale water supplier to member Tam a, and New Port p provision of the govemments. There are limited exceptions to exclusivity for members to keep Richey ILA is some facilities. substantially modified by the FL Legislature. Potable Water/ Pinellas Park Water Pinellas Park [LA 12/20/00 N/A Conveyence of Tingley Park from water management district to city for Sanitary Sewer Management District parkland/ open space. Potable Water St. Petersburg Oldsmar 1LA 5/18/79 2 years notice Wholesale agreement. Oldsmar will buy water from St. Petersburg. There is a reference to Gulfport buying water from St. Petersburg. 30 year term Potable Water St. Petersburg Gulfport ILA 10/6/88 Plus automatic St. Petersburg will sell potable water to Gulfport. renewal each year Potable Water St. Petersburg South Pasadena Resolution 1/i 1/96 1/1 I/2001 St. Petersburg to furnish potable water to South Pasadena for a period of 5 years. ~~ Parks and Recreation Pinellas County Oldsmar [LA 3/25/98 4/14/2031 (Mobbly Bay) management of property to preserve and protect its natural state Parks and Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 4/5/01 4/4/2100 (Mobbly Bay) Clarify responsibilities in management of property in Interlocal Recreation Agreeement dated 3/25/98 I I / 14/2003 ~~ Service ~ _ _ : Ps~rt~ 1 ~ ~ Party Z =, Type of _ , A reement Effective Date of _- A reemcnt ' EapirAtion Dat ~ , `nf A ement , ~Description/NOtes'. g g gre - Parks and City Ordinance Ongoing until Recreation Oldsmar Eastlake Oaks (g5 20) 10/3/95 repealed Establishing the Eastlake Oaks Community Development District 09/30/05, with Parks and automatic I year Recreation Pinellas County Largo ILA 4/22/1998 renewals until project completion Parks and Pinellas County Madeira Beach ILA 1/25/83 30 days notice City to operate and maintain facility. Profits from operation of the parking Recreation meters will be split 50/50. Parks and City to install and maintain parking meters at beach access. The County will Recreation Pinellas County St. Pete Beach ILA 5/19/87 90 days notice install and maintain parking spaces. City and County will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and City to install and maintain parking meters at beach access. The County will Recreation Pinellas County Indian Shores ILA 2/14/95 90 days notice install and maintain parking spaces. City and County will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and The agreement outlines sale and acquisition of parcels to develop Sand Key Recreation Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 1 1/20/73 N/A Park. The agreement outlines duties and obligations of both Clearwater and the County. Parks and Recreation Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 1/28/86 90 days notice City to provide lifeguards and first-aid for the County Park on Sand Key. Parks and City to install and maintain parking meters at Sand Key Park. The County will Recreation Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 7/25/84 90 days notice install and maintain parking spaces. City and County will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and Recreation Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 9/28/82 N/A Development and management of Sand Key Park. Parks and Pinellas County Hillsborough ILA 11/23/99 30 days notice Outlines operation and maintenance requirements of each county for the Recreation County Friendship Trail Bridge Southwest Florida Parks and Water Management County Default or 60 Days Construction and management of water management project and nature study/ Recreation Pinellas County District/ Pinellas ILA 8/4/76 Notice by recreational facility. The agreement has three amendments dated 7/18/78, County School 9/9/80, and 6/20/88. Board District Pinellas County helped purchase St. Andrew's Links Golf Course along with the Parks and Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 3/18/03 City of Dunedin. County citizens who reside within the unincorporated areas of Recreation Pinellas County are entitled to use certain recreation facilities as specified for the same fees as if they were residents of Dunedin. Parks and Recreation Pinellas County Pinellas MPO MOU 9/8/77 60 days notice Pinellas agrees to provide the MPO with support services. 18 I I / 14/2003 's rn ~~ ~ " ~ TYPe~of Effective Date of Expiration Dat ~ y_ ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =' Sc ce ~ ~ +~ >? ~ Pa 1 - -'b' t, ~ H.- Pa 2 ~' ~ Agreement Agreement ,; ``ofAgree~~~ent Descri tlon/tiotcs ~`~ ` ~ p ~ ~ r ~ _ ,~.. Parks and Pinellas County Belleair Bluffs Lease 6/25/74 Create awalk-in park in an area south of Wes[ Bay Drive and a sailboat Recreation launching site in an area north of West Bay Drive. Parks and Recreation Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 8/20/96 Pinellas Trail and sidewalk construction from Belleview Blvd. to Jones St. Parks and Pinellas County Indian Shores License 2/17/93 To establish a PSTA bus stop along 196th St. to enhance citizen access to the Recreation beach. Parks and Pinellas County and Florida Department Transfer ownership of the Old Gandy Bridge to the two counties for the Recreation Hillsborough County of Transportation ILA 10/15/97 N/A Friendship Trail Bridge. (plus 1 license agreement dated 12/1/99.) Parks and Pinellas County School Recreation Board Safety Harbor 5/18/1992 annual use of school facilities for recreation Parks and Pinellas County School Recreation Board Madeira Beach 6/10/01 6/9/2006 Use of Madeira Middle and Elementary Schools Parks and Pinellas County School Recreation Board Madeira Beach Park Lease 4/25/01 4/24/2006 Bi-Centennial Park Lease Parks and Center Foundation/ Recreation Safety Harbor Clearwater 4/19/1991 4/19/2006 Use of Gong Center for programming ,_ ~ ~~' ( ~. Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 10/1/00 9/30/2005 Maintenance of traffic control signals and devices Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 1/1/92 8/31/2007 Local Option Gas Tax -authorization of up to 6 cents per gallon Transportation Safety Harbor, Tarpon Oldsmar ILA 8/16/94 Ongoing Providing for joint membership representation on Pinellas Suncoast Transit Facilities Springs Authority's (PSTA) Board of Directors Transportation Oldsmar and other Facilities Pinellas County Pinellas County ILA 9/26/02 Ongoing Creation of Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Municipalities Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin ILA ]0/1/O1 9/30/2006 Provides for maintenance of traffic control signals and devices in Dunedin by Facilities Pinellas County. Transportation Florida Department of Dunedin ILA 6/24/03 N/A Provides for City of Dunedin to maintain street lights within State rights-of- Facilities Trans ortation p way. No expiration date. Transportation Florida Department of Pinellas Park Memo of 12/21/93 12/21 /2003 (10 years w/ one Installation and maintenance of landscaping by the City on State Road 55 Facilities Transportation Agreement between US Highway 19 and 49th Street. 10 year renewal) Transportation Florida Department of Pinellas Park ILA 01/10/91 60 days written Reciprocal agreement waiving access fees for projects within each others' Facilities Transportation notice jurisdiction. Transportation Florida Department of Memo of 10 years with Facilities Transportation Pinellas Park Agreement 05/13/93 one 10 year City to maintain SR 55 between 49th Street and ]02nd Avenue renewal Transportation Florida Department of Pinellas Park ILA 09/20/79 N/A City may install traftc signals on state roads with approval from the Florida Facilities Trans ortation P Department of Transportation. I I / 14/2003 ~~ ~ .;~; Sernce `Party 1 ~ ~ s Party l Type~of ~~ Effective Date of ~ _ ~> Expiration Dat " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~°~ Description/Notes .. - ~~„~ . , . .. ~ Agreement ~, .. Agrcement ,. ~~ of Agreement _ Trans ortation P Florida De artment of P Pinellas Park ILA 07/01/03 6/30/2004 Renewed City will provide maintenance service for traffic control signals and devices on Facilities Trans ortation P Florida Department of Transportation situated roadways in Pinellas Park. Annually Transportation Florida Department of 6/30/2004 City will provide maintenance service for traffic control signals and Facilities Transportation Pinellas Park ILA 07/01/03 Renewed streetlighting devices on Florida Department of "transportation situated Annually roadways in Pinellas Park. Transportation Florida Department of Facilities Transportation Safety Harbor [LA 6/13/2003 N/A Street light maintenance. indefinite, but may be Transportation North Redington terminated by Reimburse Madeira Beach the actual cost of fuel per invoice plus a $0.10 per Facilities Beach Madeira Beach ILA 10/2/95 either party with gallon administrative fee. Madeira Beach reimburses North Redington Beach 30 days written its pro rata share of any fuel tax refunds or rebates received notice Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 10/l/00 9/30/2005 Traftc Control Signals Maintenance Agreement Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Madeira Beach 1/1/92 8/31/2007 6th Cent Local Option Gas Tax Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 10/01/00 09/30/05 County will provide maintenance service for Traffic Control Signals and Facilities Devices situated in Pinellas Park. Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 07/27/00 N/A Transfer 1 IOth Avenue North from 58th Street North to US Highway 19 North Facilities from County to City. Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Safety Harbor 10/1/2000 9/30/2005 Traffic signal maintenance. Transportation F iliti Pinellas County Safety Harbor 2/25/1999 Pro ect ~ Enterprise Road sidewalks. ac es Completion Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Safety Harbor Intersection improvement at SR 590 and McMullen Booth Road. Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 09/01/97 08/31/07 Gas tax agreement- allows county to collect six cents per gallon and distribute Facilities (Cities in County) 25% to cities. Can only be Transportation F iliti Pinellas MPO Pinellas County h MOA 10/22/78 terminated by Ensures participation in transportation planning. ac es Sc ool Board the School Board. Transportation Hil Isborough Facilities Pinellas MPO County ILA 6/21/05 30 days notice Only amendment in file 3/25/00 (HIV transportation service 3/1/99). Transportation Facilities Pinellas MPO Safety Harbor 4/14/1999 N/A Transportation planning membership, review every 5 years Transportation Pinellas Suncoast Facilities Transit Authority Madeira Beach Contract 6/8/76 N/A No termination date established. Transportation Pinellas Suncoast Pinellas Park ILA 03/13/03 N/A Allows PSTA to install and provide passenger shelters within the boundaries of Facilities Transit Authority Pinellas Park. "transportation Pinellas Suncoast Facilities Transit Authority Safety Harbor 9/16/1994 N/A Countywide transit authority membership 20 1 I / 14/2003 Service ;>-' a ` ~ ,T~Partyl,.° - ~ ` ~ ~; ~Pnrty2 TypeoC ,_ ~=- ~ Effective Date of ::, Explradon Dat .,~ ~ ~ ` ` ~~ ;` ~ ~ "'w,a, .; Description/Notes' - z ~ ~ : ~ - ;, r . ~ ~ ; ° ~ -Agreement :;s Agreement ~ of Agreement , Transportation Facilities Pinellas County Largo [LA 10/1/2000 9/30/2005 Maintenance of traffic control signals and devices Largo, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Transportation Dunedin, Pinellas Facilities Pinellas County park, Oldsmar, ILA 8/17/1993 N/A Reestablishes the Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Harbor, Tarpon Springs, PSTA Transportation Oldsmar and other Facilities Pinellas County Pinellas County [LA 2/1/00 1/31/2010 Penny For Pinellas I% sales surtax for infrasstructure Municipalities ,.., _ , <, ~. ,_ .., ~ :.rte r Y Planning Pinellas County Clearwater ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (1/14/92 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 7/6/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (2/21/95 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 8/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (9/13/99 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Safety Harbor ILA 7/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (3/24/92 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County Largo ILA 10/23/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas County Tarpon Springs ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (10/10/89 original agreement). Planning Pinellas County St. Petersburg ILA 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. 9/30/01 plus 1 year Planning Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 10/23/00 automatic Provides expression ofinter-agency cooperation and defines the Pinellas Park Planning Area. renewals through 9/30/10 Planning Pinellas County Madeira Beach 2/1/02 American Assembly automatic renewals in successive 3 Planning Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 5/4/93 year periods Cooperation Agreement Community Development Block Grant unless County or City provides. written notice Planning Largo Clearwater ILA 4/18/2000 N/A Reestablishes each party's sewer service area and establishes Belleair Road as the annexation boundary Planning Pinellas County Largo and Pinellas Park ILA 7/11/2000 N/A Establishes annexation boundary lines between Pinellas Park and Largo Provides that County-owned land voluntarily annexed into Pinellas Park retains Planning Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA the right to develop through County permitting process and existing County zoning. 21 I 1 / 14/2003 `~ Service ; _ :, , ~ ~'; Party 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ pa ~ ~ 3 ~ i'tY Type of ~ ~~ °~ • _ ~ffecUveDate of ., Expiration Dat . ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ ; ~ ~. ncscriptioni~iotc5 ~,, r. s . Agreement , Agreement of Agreement ~. Provides that County-owned land voluntarily annexed into Largo retains the Planning Pinellas County Largo ILA 9/27/1999 N/A right to develop through County permitting process and existing County zoning. 22 11/14/2003 a .. 4 DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements :..: Service Party 1 ' Party 2 .Type of, Effective Date ~ ~ Expiration Date of - Description /Notes *,r ; . ~.,.. _ ~ v3 ,Agreement of Agreement , ., Agreement Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Mehlenbacher Rd Transportation Pinellas County Belleau Agreement 06/06/79 unless or until with Belleau C/L's and the CITY will maintain Indian terminated Rocks Rd and Rosery Rd within their C/L's Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain W Bay Dr from Gulf Transportation Pinellas County Belleau Beach Agreement 10/27/70 unless or until terminated Blvd [o Belleau Bluffs C/L's Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas Coun Belleau Beach Agreement 10/27/70 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Gulf Blvd within Belleau Beach C/L's terminated Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain W Bay Dr from Transportation Pinellas County Belleau Bluffs Agreement 06/16/70 unless or until terminated gelleair Beach C/L's to Largo C/L's Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Mehlenbacher Rd Transportation Pinellas County Belleau Bluffs Agreement 11/08/79 unless or until terminated with Belleau Blufts C/L's Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Keene Road from Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 unless or until terminated Drew St to Palmetto St Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from a terminated Point S of Nursery Rd to a point N of Drew St Defines that [he County will maintain Hercules Ave from Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 unless or until Beverly Dr to Kendall Dr and from a point north of Magnolia Dr to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd and from Sunset Point Rd terminated to Union Street Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Highland Ave from terminated Belleau Rd to Lemon St; and from Tangerine St to Union St Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Sunset Point Rd from Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 04/13/71 unless or until terminated US 19A to Keene Rd Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Nursery Rd from Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 07/10/79 unless or until Highland Ave to US 19; and that the City will maintain terminated Highland Ave from SR 60 to Union St Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 08/09/79 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from Belleau Rd to SR 580 terminated I I / 14/2003 DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Type of Effective Date Expiration Date of Service Party 1 Party 2 Agreement. ' o[Agreement Agreement" Description !Notes Defines that the County will maintain Union St from US 19A to Hercules Ave; and Montclair Rd/Old Coachman Rd from Hercules Ave to SR 60; and Palmetto St from Hercules This Agreement may Ave to Belcher Rd; and Lake Ave from SR 60 to the Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater Agreement 12/29/81 be modified or southerly C/L's of Clearwater; and Betty Lane from amended only by an Palmetto St to Sunset Point Rd. It also defines that the City agreement in writing will maintain Bayshore Blvd from SR 60 to Safety Harbor C/L's; and Lakeview Ave from US 19A to Missouri Ave; and Myrtle Ave from Lakeview Ave to US 19A Transfers full ownership and responsibility for CR 255 (also Remain in full affect known as Coronado Dr -from Gulfview Blvd to Causeway Transportation Pinellas County Clearwater ILA unless or until Blvd) and CR 245 (also known as both S Gulfview Blvd terminated from Gulf Blvd to Gulfview Blvd; and Gulfview Blvd from Gulfview Blvd S to Coronado Dr) Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain CR 1 within Dunedin Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin Agreement 08/11/70 unless or until ' terminated C/L s as defined at the date of execution. Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin Agreement 08/1 1/70 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Virginia Ave from terminated Main St to Lake Haven Dr States the County will own and maintain CR 1 from Main This Agreement may St to Curlew Rd; CR 712 (Dunedin Cswy) from W End to be modified or US 19A; Union St from US 19A to Hercules Ave, Belcher Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin lLA 12/17/81 amended only by an Rd from City of Dunedin S C/L's to Curlew Rd. States the agreement in writing City will own and maintain New York Ave from Main St to San Christopher Dr. Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Gulfport Blvd and Transportation Pinellas County Gulfport Agreement 06/30/70 unless or until 22nd St S within Gulfport C/L's (further defined as from terminated 64th St to 49th St N) from the date of execution. Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Indian Rocks Agreement 11/15/73 unless or until Defines [hat the County will maintain Gulf Blvd tiom 5th Beach terminated Ave to the Town of Belleair Beach C/L's Transportation Pinellas County Kenneth City Agreemenl 06/05/75 Defines that the County will maintain those portions of 54th Ave N within Kenneth City C/L's 2 I 1 / 14/2003 r :± V DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements _' ~ Service Party 1 - ~' Party 2 TYPe of . Effective DAte Expiration Date of ": Description /Notes +• ` ,`:.Agreement of Agreement Agreement This Agreement may Defines that the County will maintain those portions of 58th Transportation Pinellas County Kenneth City Agreement 12/08/81 be modified or St N from 38th Ave N to 70th Ave N; and 46th Ave N from amended only by an 66th St N to 37th St N within Kenneth City C/L's agreement in writing Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Starkey Road from Transportation Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 unless or until the SW corner of 36-29-IS to E Bay Dr terminated Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Highland Ave from E Transportation Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/] 6/70 unless or until gay Dr to Belleair Rd terminated Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain W Bay Dr from Transportation Pinellas Coun Largo Agreement 06/16/70 unless or until Belleair Bluffs C/L's to Clearwater Largo Rd terminated Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Belleair Rd from Transportation Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 unless or until Highland Ave to Keene Rd terminated Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from Transportation Pinellas County Largo Agreement 06/16/70 unless or until 138th Ave N to a point S of E Bay Dr terminated This Agreement may Transportation Pinellas County Largo Agreement 09/11/79 be modified or Defines that the County will maintain Belcher Rd from amended only by an 126th Ave N to Belleair Rd agreement in writing Transfersfull ownership and responsibility for CR CR385 Remain in full affect and 434 (also known as McMullen Road from Lake Ave to Transportation Pinellas County Largo ILA unless or until Keene Road) and CR 395 (also known Alternate Keene terminated Road from E Bay Drive to McMullen Road) and Fulton Dr SE from Willow Ave to E Bay Drive Transfers full ownership and responsibility for CR 881 (also Remain in full affect known as 58th St N from 62nd Ave N to 70th Ave N) and a Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park ILA 08/25/89 unless or until portion of CR 583 (58th St N from 82nd Ave N to 102nd terminated Ave N) and CR 298 (102nd Ave N from 66th St N to 88th St N) 1 I / 14/2003 DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Service Party 1; Party 2 .. Type of ~ Effective Date - Expiration Date of ~ . , Descriptign /Notes ' i Agreement of Agreement Agreement Transfer of roadway the County to Pinellas Park that Transportation Pinellas Count Pinellas Park ILA 07/23/01 No terms of include JAN CORY SUBDIVISION STREET RIGHT OF termination found WAY, 69th Ave N between 66th St N and 67th St N, and 44th St N between 118th Ave N and 130th Ave N Transportation FDOT Safety Harbor Roadway 09/15/95 No terms of Transfers full ownership and responsibility for that portion Transfer Form termination found of Old SR 590 from 10th St to SR 580 Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain Park St from South Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 unless or until terminated Pasadena C/L's to Tyrone Blvd (aka SR 595) Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Gulfport Blvd and terminated 22nd Ave S from Gulfport City Limits to 4th St N Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain 38th Ave N from terminated Tyrone Blvd to Haines Rd Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain 54th Ave N from 24th S[ N to 9th St N terminated Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Agreement 06/05/70 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain 9th St N from Haines terminated Rd to Gandy Bridge Blvd Remain in full affect Transfers full ownership and responsibility for that portion Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg ILA 10/14/97 unless or until of Central Avenue (formerly CR 150) from 34th St N (US terminated 19) to 3rd St (SR 92) Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 unless or until Mines that the County will maintain Florida Ave from CR terminated 80 (currently Curlew PI) to Sunset Dr Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Orange SdRiverside terminated Dr and Spring Blvd from Gulf Rd to US 19A Remain in full affect Defines that the County will maintain one route known as Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 unless or until Gulf Rd/Whitcomb Blvd/Carolina Ave/Meres Blvd from teRninated Florida Ave to US 19A Remain in full affect Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/09/71 unless or until Defines that the County will maintain Sunset Dr from terminated Howard Park to Florida Ave 4 11/14/2003 A't ,~"s s `~ DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements ' ~ ' Service Party 1 Party 2 . ~ Type of Effective Date Expiration Date of Description/Notes ,, ,Agreement ofAgreement ..Agreement Defines that the County will maintain (1) Gulf Rd/Whitcomb Blvd/Carolina Ave/Meres Blvd from Florida This Agreement may Ave to US 19A; and (2) West Tarpon Ave/N Spring Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs Agreement 09/14/83 be modified or Blvd/Riverside Dr/Tarpon Dr from Gulf Rd to US 19A; and amended only by an (3) Sunset Dr from Howard Park to Florida Ave; and (4) agreement in writing Meres Blvd from Florida Ave to US 19A; and (5) Live Oak St from US 19A to US 19 Remain in full affect Sets the terms and conditions for the County to transfers full Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs [LA 07/27/93 unless or until ownership and responsibility for Live Oak Street from US terminated 19A to US 19 in exchange for funding This Agreement may Clarifies that the CITY will own and maintain 107th Transportation Pinellas County Treasure Island Agreement 04/06/82 be modified or Avenue /Treasure Island Cswy from Gulf Blvd to the ' amended only by an western C/L s of St Petersburg; and, West Gulf Blvd from it agreement in writing southern terminus to Gulf Blvd Sets the terms and conditions for the County to provide Termination is funding to Dunedin to beautify (landscape) certains areas Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 06/25/01 subject to non- along CR 712 (Dunedin Cswy) within the road right-of-way performance or by areas in exchange for Dunedin assuming responsibility for mutual consent/ mowing and landscape maintenance along same portion of R/W. For Miles Creek from 58th St N to Jce's Creek Outfall -this is a 30-Year agreement that initially sets the terms for Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg ILA 03/16/82 03/16/22 improvement by the City with the County responsible for 50% of the construction costs and up to 30 years of ongoing maintenance responsibility Defines assignment of shared city and county maintained Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg ILA 01/06/83 No terms of responsibilities along 77th Avenue Canal (aka Sawgrass termination found Lake Outfall) between the east R/W line of I-275 to 80th Ave N Various terms of East Lake termination Sets the terms and conditions for East Lake Woodlands, Transportation Pinellas County Woodlands Ltd. Lease 12/01/81 mentioned. Lease is Ltd., to lease roadways to secure them from public usage otherwise a perpetual and assigns maintenance burden to lessee. agreement I I / 14/2003 DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements "Service Party l Party. 2 Type of Effective Date Ezpiration Dste of: ~ Description /Notes Agreement of Agreement Agreement Sets the terms and conditions for Belleair Beach to perform Transportation Pinellas County Belleair Beach ILA 05/21/02 05/21/05 certain maintenance operations, including mowing, grading and litter pickup, along Belleair Cswy, aka CR 416 Permit provides for the City to mow and edge grass within No terms of roadway medians at: Belcher Rd from Ulmerton Rd to Kent Transportation Pinellas County Largo Utility License 05/22/96 termination found PI; and Keene Rd from E Bay Dr to Rosery Rd; and Starkey Rd from Ulmerton Rd to E Bay Dr; and Ridge Rd from Ulmerton Rd to W Bay Dr No terms of Sets the terms and condition which allows Pinellas Park to Transportation Pinellas County Pinellas Park Agreement 02/26/81 termination found landscape and maintain mowing and plantings along 49th St N from 62nd Ave N to 102nd Ave N Transportation Pinellas County Seminole JPA 10/03/75 Allows the City to landscape and maintain that portion of 1 13th St N north within Seminole C/L,'s. Allows the City to landscape 9th St N north of 118th Ave N Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Utility License 08/18/92 to FDOT right of way. Stipulates a maintenance agreement must be enacted for the City to perform maintenance and mowing. Allows the City to landscape 54th Ave N bet 22nd St N and Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Utility License 03/26/93 4th St N. Stipulates a maintenance agreement must be enacted for the City to perform maintenance and mowing Allows the City to landscape 62nd Ave N bet 28th St N and Transportation Pinellas County St Petersburg Utility License 03/26/93 12th St N, and 38th Ave N bet 58th St and 55th St N. Stipulates a maintenance agreement must be enacted for the City to perform maintenance and mowing. Transportation Pinellas County Belleair Beach ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Belleair Bluffs ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Dunedin ILA 10/01/O1 09/30/06 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Gulfport ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Indian Rocks ILA 10/01 /00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain Beach city signal equipment d I 1 / 14/2003 ''~ .Q DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements ': Service ` Party 1 = :~ . Party 2 _ Type of Effective Date Explrstion Date of- Description /Notes ~ • ,. Agreement , of Agreement Agreement a•, r. s~~ Transportation Pinellas County Indian Shores ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Largo ILA 10/OI/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Madeira Beach ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Oldsmar ILA 10/01/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Redington Beach ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Safety Harbor [LA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Seminole ILA 10/O1/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County South Pasadena ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County St Pete Beach ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Tarpon Springs [LA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Transportation Pinellas County Treasure Island ILA 10/Ol/00 09/30/05 Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain city signal equipment Crescent Oaks Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain Community Traffic Law signs and other traffic control devices along private Law Enforcement Pinellas County Association, Enforcement Pending Pending roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas County Pinellas County Agreement Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one- Sheriffs Office year, Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal agreement each year. East Lake Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain Woodlands Traffic Law signs and other traffic control devices along private Law Enforcement Pinellas County Community Enforcement 10/01/03 09/30/04 roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas County Association, Agreement Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one- Pinellas Count y year, Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal Sheriffs Office agreement each year. lI/l4/2003 DRAFT Pinellas County TRANSPORTATION Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Service '; P.tirtyl Party2 Type of - o Effective Date ~ Eapiration Date of - ~ ~ ~ Description/Notes. ,Agreement of Agreement Agreement Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain signs and other traffic control devices along private Forest Ridge Traffic law roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas County law Enforcement Pinellas County Homeowner's Enforcement 10/01/03 09/30/04 Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one- Association Agreement year, Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal agreement each year. President's Sets the terms and conditions for the County to maintain Landing " signs and other traffic control devices along private Homeowner's Caffic Law roadways and provide provision for the Pinellas County Law Enforcement Pinellas County Association, Enforcement 10/01/03 09/30/04 Sheriffs Office to enforce. Contains provision for two, one- Pinellas County Agreement year, Option of Renewal, upon execution of a renewal Sheriffs Office agreement each year. Transportation /Parks ff L 06/25/74 The lease may be ll d b i h Sets teRns and conditions for the City to lease part of the and Leisure Pinellas County Belleau Blu s ease cance e y e t er Belleau Cswy R/W as a Park. party given 8 I 1 / 14/2003 1$ .i ;~ Interlocal Service Delivery Agreement Project INFORMATION RECEIVED AS OF 11/12/03 RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS, DEFICIENCIES, DUPLICATIONS OR OVERLAPS From City of Dunedin/Solid Waste Division: "The issue I have with the current interlocal between the City and the County is that it basically is an unfounded mandate upon the City. Since the State eliminated grant funding for recycling, the Cities are still required to operate recycling programs and report the result so the County, however the cities receive no financial assistance to operate these programs. Without the cities continuing recycling programs, the County would not come close to meeting the State goal of 30 percent recycling rate." "The County replaced the grant funding it lost with tipping fees received at the waste to energy facility, in order to fund recycling programs in the unincorporated areas of the County. Most of the tipping fees are paid by municipalities within the County. However, the County has not made any funding available to the Cities to help cover the coats of the recycling programs we are bound to operate due to the interlocal agreement." From City of Safety Harbor: SERVICE AGREE ENTITIES GAP STANDARD STRATEGY COMMENTS MENT # sanitary None Safety Harbor, Treatment population Renegotiate Based upon sewer Clearwater capacity agreement buildout projections, too much treatment capacity is reserved sanitary None Safety Harbor, Collection Septic systems Annexation Unin- sewer Pinellas agreement corporated County enclaves in service area are not served sanitary None Safety Harbor, Collection Septic systems Capital Unnerved sewer Pinellas improvement areas in Coun service area drainage None Safety Harbor, Drainage Capital Cooperative Recommended Clearwater, improve- projects funding projects in Pinellas ments Safety Harbor Coun are not funded transportatio None Safety Harbor, Project Agreement Complete Sidewalks at n Pinellas incomplete project CSX RR County crossing not completed by Coun recreation None Safety Harbor, Facility Swimming Renegotiate Potential gap Clearwater, pool agreement in programs Center associated Foundation with the Long Center swimming ool From City of Safety Harbor: SERVICE AGREEMENT # ENTITIES DUPLICATION POTENTIAL STRATEGIES COMMENTS Recreation None Safety Facility Renegotiate Safety Harbor Harbor, Agreement community Center center recently Foundation, enlarged Clearwater From City of Safety Harbor: ENTITIES AGREEMENT # SERVICE ACTION COMMENTS REQUIRED Safety Harbor, None Sanitary Sewer Update existing Renegotiate Clearwater agreement treatment capacity at NE Regional Facility based on buildout ro'ections Safety Harbor, None Recreation Renegotiate Potential Clearwater, Center existing agreement duplication of Foundation facilities now that City community center ex anded Safety Harbor, None Solid Waste Review Service Expires in 2004, Waste Delivery Options review cost to Management provide in-house vs contract wpdocs/service delivery issues summary 1 ~ ~; ~.:._ i ~~ ~~~ ~1~Y1 ;~~ Y~:°3 `%r~--~C~ ~~or~~ r~ C,~c. rye ~nt~+~ ;;, ;;; ~~, ~~ ~~ ~ }~? ~~ ., ( - ~i~ r (/ ~ ~I~~Q ^ G " S~f ~ j G~ .. -~ S 1.~.,.~.~ A,C~~t,.~ ~-~~-5~ ~ C iL. ,Cl ~, ~ JQ,C `C p o t` O' ~ co / e ~~.5' ~} i• . f' + r /lid ~~ ~ \/ i ~ ~~ l ,; f ~ + -- I'1 E' I ~1 AGENDA PREPARING AN INTERLOCAL SERVICE DELIVERY REPORT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY Monday, September 15, 2003, 10:00 am Pinellas Co. utilities conference room ^ Introductions ^ Quick Overview of Requirements (Including DCA Meeting And Relationship To Comprehensive Plans) ^ The Pinellas Assembly - Relationship To The Requirements ^ Status Of Inventory - Completion Date? ^ Discussion Of Draft Report ^ Discussion Of Next Steps - Are There Any Overlaps, Gaps, Or Deficiencies In Service Delivery? How Do We Approach This? ^ Date To Complete Identification Of Overlaps, Gaps, or Deficiencies ^ Getting Agreement On The Final Report ^ Schedule And Next (Final?) Meeting i DRAFT REPORT SERVICE DELIVERY IN PINELLAS COUNTY An Inventory and Assessment of Service Delivery Agreements OVERVIEW OF PINELLAS COUNT Introduction Pinellas County is a mature urban county with over 921,000 permanent residents. The land area is small, about 280 square miles, but there are 25 local governments located within this small peninsular county. Importantly, the County is over 96 percent built-out. This set of circumstances is unique in Florida, and has resulted in, among other things, a long and necessary history of coordination in service delivery among governments and agencies. Figure 1 depicts the Municipal and unincorporated County boundaries in Pinellas County. It also includes the population and land area of each Municipality as well as the unincorporated County. In addition to coordinating with one another, the County and the Municipalities also coordinate routinely with several Special Districts. There are 36 Special Districts recorded for Pinellas County; however, they do not all have a relationship to the requirements of this Report. Following review of the 36 Districts, only those with a direct service delivery responsibility have been included in the Report. Pinellas Assembly While service delivery is generally well-coordinated throughout Pinellas County, it is not perfect. In May of 2002, representatives from area businesses, civic groups, neighborhoods, environmental groups, the cities and the county all came together to discuss the opportunities and challenges facing Pinellas County in regard to annexation, urban service delivery and financing, development and intergovernmental cooperation. The result of this landmark Assembly event was agreement to move forward with a series of task forces comprised of citizens, with staff support from the County and the Municipalities, to undertake a more thorough evaluation of the selected issues with the hope of moving towards long term and mutually beneficial improvements and solutions to benefit the County as a whole. The Task Forces convened throughout the Summer and Fall of 2003 to address: (1) Annexation Policy/Guidelines, (2) City/County MSTU/Division of Costs and Revenues, (3) Fire/Emergency Medical Services Structures and Financing, (4) Health Care Services, (5) Law Enforcement Structures and Financing, (6) Recreation Structures and Financing, and (7) Transportation Integration. In particular, the Task Forces addressing City/County MSTU/Division of Costs and Revenues, Fire/Emergency Medical Services Structures and Financing, Law Enforcement Structures and Financing, Recreation Structures and Financing, and Transportation Integration appeared to have a direct relationship to the new Chapter 163, F.S., Interlocal Service Delivery Report requirements. For this reason, the findings of the Pinellas Assembly Task Forces are included with this Report, and represent the assessment of issues, deficiencies or gaps in those areas of service delivery. ISCUSSION OF EXISTING COORDINATION MECHANISMS Overview The small size of Pinellas County, the presence of 25 local governments, and the rapid urbanization since the 1940s and 1950s. has required the County and the municipalities to coordinate closely on the provision of essential public services and facilities, and to reach agreement on which local government is responsible for providing urban services to a particular area. In some cases, a Special District has been established to provide specific services for a specific area. There are few, if any, areas of the County today that do not have access to necessary urban services. The 25 local governments in Pinellas County actively coordinate with other jurisdictions and agencies to ensure effective service delivery through a myriad of formal and informal agreements and understandings. The use of interlocal agreements and related coordinating mechanisms remain the primary tools of formal coordination between, and among other local governments and agencies. On a day-to-day basis though, informal communications, meetings, workshops, etc., remain the most common - and often most successful - means of intergovernmental coordination. Effectiveness of Coordination and Coordination Agreements Coordination in Pinellas County among the providers and the recipients of urban services is both necessary and extensive. In most cases, this coordination is effective, and the delivery of services is accomplished routinely and efficiently by the Municipality, the County or a Special District through a variety of agreements and arrangements. The following services are examples of effective service delivery arrangements, reflecting the long history of formalized intergovernmental and inter-agency coordination required for service provision in this small urban County. r Education The Pinellas County School Board is responsible for public school planning, policy and education in Pinellas County. Coordination is extensive, ongoing and effective between the School Board, Pinellas County and the 12 municipalities with public schools (Clearwater, Dunedin, Gulfport, Largo, Madeira beach, Oldsmar, Pinellas Park, Safety Harbor, Seminole, St. Petersburg, St. Pete Beach and Tarpon Springs). For example, interlocal agreements exist regarding public school siting (consistent with the Educational Facilities Act of 1995 and the more recent legislative changes made in 2002), coordination and sharing of information, the use of consistent population projections, etc. Conclusion? any deficiencies? gaps? in service delivery... Sanitary Sewer Table 2 and Figure 3 summarize existing service delivery arrangements for sanitary sewer. In addition to public service providers, there are 2 private treatment entities (Top of the World and Dyna Flow). There are no areas of the County that are not included within a defined service area. This is due to a long history of Municipal and County-level urban services planning, including the delineation of service areas and commitments to building the infrastructure. Pinellas County Utilities maintains periodic contact with the 3 private service providers, in order to anticipate, or plan for, any potential service delivery issues. Conclusion? any deficiencies? gaps? in service delivery... Solid Waste Pinellas County operates under the 1975 Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery Act, which provides the authority and responsibility for countywide disposal of solid waste to Pinellas County. Subsequently, the capacity of the County's Resource Recovery Plant and landfill has been designed to meet the disposal needs of the entire County. As a part of Solid Waste Operations, the County also manages a countywide chemical and hazardous waste collection program, an artificial reef program for the disposal of certain construction debris, a metals recovery operation, recycling operations, and operates as a waste-to-energy operation. The Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery Act also created the Technical Management Committee (TMC) requiring representation from all of the Municipalities and the County to review and make recommendations regarding rates, fees, policies, programs, integration of new technologies, selection of consultants, etc. The TMC function provides an ongoing, collaborative and successful relationship among the service provider and the recipients of the service. Conclusion? any deficiencies? gaps? in service delivery... Drainage Pinellas County and the Municipalities coordinate routinely on flood control and watershed-related projects through informal processes and formal interlocal agreements. Many local governments have, and are implementing, stormwater master plans. In the process, coordination with other jurisdictions is routine in the case where basins might overlap or conditions upstream affect conditions downstream. In addition to local government service providers, the Pinellas Park Water Management District provides flood control in portions of the unincorporated area and the City of Pinellas Park. While coordination among service providers is generally good, there are some differences of opinion regarding areas of responsibility. Conclusion? any deficiencies? gaps? in service delivery... Potable Water Table 2 and Figure 2 summarize existing service delivery arrangements for potable water. In Pinellas County, the primary provider of potable supply is the Tampa Bay Water Authority, a Special District. The two largest water suppliers in the County are Pinellas County Utilities and the City of St. Petersburg, who are both member governments of the Tampa Bay Water Authority and receive all of their water for wholesale and retail distribution from Tampa Bay Water. In addition to Tampa Bay Water, and the County and City of St. Petersburg water systems, the cities of Clearwater, Tarpon Springs, Dunedin and Belleair all own and operate their own municipal wells and water systems, although Pinellas County Utilities is provides potable water when needed to ensure that their water demands are met. This is accomplished through long standing interlocal agreements. In addition to routine requirements, agreements among service providers (e.g., between the County and the City of St. Petersburg) ensure the ability to share, or trade water when necessary for emergency purposes via specific interconnections among water systems. In all, the informal and formal coordination to ensure the availability of adequate and safe water supply throughout Pinellas County is both sophisticated and effective. Conclusion? any deficiencies? gaps? in service delivery... While the intergovernmental and inter-agency coordination necessary for efficient service delivery in this County is largely effective, and is the result of many years of coordination, the results are not so clear in the provision of some services. The Pinellas Assembly process has resulted from increased concern, and in some cases, friction, over the effectiveness and efficiency of certain existing service delivery arrangements, finances, and responsibilities. In particular, the following areas of service delivery have been identified as issues through the Assembly process. Public Safety The efficiency of Fire Protection and EMS service delivery is the subject of a specific Pinellas Assembly Task Team. In addition, existing Law Enforcement arrangements and responsibilities are also being studied, and include an examination of funding mechanisms, data management, individual responsibilities and opportunities for better coordination towards more effective, equitable and efficient provision of fire, EMS and law enforcement services. Parks and Recreation Historically the County has focused on providing passive regional parks and preservelands for the County's residents and visitors. The Municipalities have traditionally provided for the active recreation needs of their community. In recent years, this arrangement has not been able to keep up with the demand for active recreation throughout the County. For example, unincorporated residents were increasingly turning to the Municipalities to meet their active recreation needs, and the municipalities were faced with increasing demand, limited opportunities for expansion in a built-out County, increasing costs to provide service, etc. Frequently, unincorporated residents were charged more for access to a Municipal recreation. service. With awell-established regional park system in place, it was time for the County to respond to the increasing demand for active recreation. A Pinellas Assembly Task Force is currently looking at the coordination required to finance, partner in the delivery of, and expand the array of recreational options available to residents in a manner that is both equitable and efficient. Transportation The Transportation Integration Task Force has started to focus on some key elements for integrating plans for providing a comprehensive transportation system with the resources needed to implement those plans. The Task Force is attempting to identify and recommend potential funding sources to complete the missing segments of the County's long-range highway plan, and look at the need for improved mass transit. An essential component of the County's transportation system is the support it provides to improving the quality of life for residents and visitors. For example, urban roadway design features, landscaping, and the construction of trails and sidewalks must be incorporated into improvements to the transportation system in order to reinforce Pinellas County's reputation as a quality urban environment for residents and businesses. Continued cooperation between the municipalities, the County, and the State will be critical to ensuring that adequate funding is earmarked for the needed improvements, and that the improvements achieve the community's quality of life objectives. In order to better visualize the extent and degree of urban service delivery in Pinellas County, several Tables and Figures are included in this Report. Figure 2 depicts existing potable water service areas, Figure 3 depicts wastewater collection and treatment service areas, and Figure 4 depicts reclaimed water service areas in Pinellas County. Figure 5 depicts the different Fire Districts in Pinellas County, and Figure 6 depicts the jurisdictions covered by the different law enforcement providers in the County. See the Section on Pinellas Assembly Findings/Results for conclusions and recommendations relating to improvements in public safety, parks and recreation and transportation service delivery. Table 1 identifies each local government in Pinellas County and the Special Districts who are parties to agreements with a local government(s) relevant to the delivery of services considered in this Report. Table 2 summarizes the service provider/service recipient relationships for the subject areas. Table 1: Jurisdictions and Reporting Entities Jurisdiction/District T e of Re ortin Enti Town of Belleair local overnment Ci of Belleair Beach local overnment Ci of Belleair Bluffs local overnment Town of Belleair Shore local ovemment Ci of Clearwater local overnment Ci of Dunedin local overnment Ci of Gul ort local overnment Ci of Indian Rocks Beach local overnment Town of Indian Shores local overnment Town of Kenneth Ci local overnment Ci of Lar o local overnment Ci of Madeira Beach local overnment Town of No. Redin ton Beach local overnment Ci of Oldsmar local overnment Ci of Pinellas Park local overnment Town of Redin ton Beach local overnment Town of Redin ton Shores local overnment Ci of Safe Harbor local overnment Ci of St. Pete Beach local overnment Ci of St. Petersbur local overnment Ci of Seminole local overnment Ci of south Pasadena local overnment Ci of Ta on S rin s local overnment Ci of Treasure Island local overnment Pinellas Coun local overnment East Lake Tarpon Special Fire Control District - Independent Special District Lealman Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Palm Harbor Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Pinellas Suncoast Special Fire Control District Independent Special District Greater Seminole Area Special Recreation District Independent Special District Pinellas County Educational Facilities Authori Dependent Special District Pinellas County Emergency Medical Services Authori Dependent Special District Pinellas Park Water Management District Independent Special District Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authori Inde endent S ecial District Tam a Ba Water Authori Inde endent S ecial District Southwest ~ Florida Water Mana ement District Independent Special District Pinellas Coun School Board T e o enti ?? TABLE 2-1 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship Sanitary Sewer Systems PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION ° i O1 ~ v ~~ 3 ~ o ~ ~ o rn 'u v obi 01 ~ O ~ C ~ } } ~ 'L ~ ~ ~ ~ a m. ~ o ~ O v) a I- ~ ~ ~~ O Belleair X Belleair Bench X Belleair Bluffs X Belleair Shore X Clearwater X Dunedin X Gulfport X Indian Rocks Beach X Treat* X Indian Shores X Kenneth City X ~- - Largo X X Madeira Beach X N. Redington Beach X Oldsmar X Pinellas Park X Treat* X X Redington Beach X Redington Shores X Safety Harbor X Treat* X St. Petersburg X X X St. Pete Beach X Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (Uninc) X East Lake Tarpon (Uninc) X Greater Seminole (Uninc) X Lealman (Uninc) X X Tierra Verde (Uninc) X Remaining Unin- cor orated Areas X X X X X X X X * Sewer System only provides treatment 04/25/02 TABLE 2-2 Service Provider/Service Recipient Relationship Potable Water Systems PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION o o ~ ~ c .a ~ 'c ~ -~~' c. o ~ L m ~ ~ .o +°-i `-" ~ y `o ~ ~ ~ 3 -°~~ o ~ ~ o~ ,° a ~ ~ 3 ~ ~~ ii ~ ii ~ m v o ~ a ~°n vi ' v~ ~ I-° ~ O Belleair X Belleair Beach X Belleair Bluffs X Belleair Shore X Clearwater X X Dunedin X Gulfport X X Indian Rocks Beach X Indian Shores X Kenneth City X Largo X Madeira Beach X N. Redington Bch X Oldsmar X X X Pinellas Park X X Redington Bench X Redington Shores X Safety Harbor X X St. Petersburg X St. Pete Bench X Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (Uninc) X East Lake Tarpon (Uninc) X Greater Seminole (Uninc) X Lenlmnn (Uninc) X X X Tierra Verde (Uninc) X Remaining Unin- cor orated Arens X X X X X X X X *Only provides treated water; water distribution to customers is provided by applicable municipal system as noted 05/06/02 r -- T~i3LE 2-3 Service Provider/Service j Reci lent Relationshi Lnw Enforcement JURISDICTION 0 3 0 N ~- °~ ~ ~ 4- G `.~' ~ _V d O G `H i ~ •v ~ d N ~ S ~ p O ~ S a V) ~ a V o_ V7 Belleair X Belleair Beach X Belleair Bluffs X Belleair Shore Xl Clearwater X Dunedin X Gulfport X Indian Rocks Bench X Indian Shores XZ Kenneth City X Largo X Madeira Bench X N. Redington Bench X Oldsmar X Pinellas Park X Redington Bench X Redington Shores X Safety Harbor X St. Petersburg X St. Pete Beach X Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (Uninc) X East Lake Tarpon (Uninc) X Greater Seminole (Uninc) X Lealman (Uninc) X Tierra Verde (Uninc) X Remaining Unincorp. Areas X ' Belleair Shore contracts with Belleair Beach for law enforcement services; s Indian Shores contracts with Redington Shores for law enforcement services (Source: Pinellas County Planning Dept. 4/25/02) TABLE 2-4 Service provider/Service Recipient Relationshi Fire Service PINELLAS COUNTY JURISDICTION } ~ L ~~ a u ~ r ~ ~ u_ } ~ ~u ~ 'u •_ ~ ~L ~ ~+ ~ .~ L ~~ o d u ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v}i c ~ ~ ~ c n V) ~ ~~ 3 ~ ~ V< N u7 V ~ Bellenir X1 Bellenir Bench Xi Belleair Bluffs Xl Belleair Shore XZ Clearwater X Dunedin X Gulfport X Indian Rocks Bench Xz Indian Shores XZ Kenneth City X3 Largo X Madeira Beach X N. Redington Beach Xa Oldsmar w/uninc. area Xg Pinellas Park X Redington Bench Xa Redington Shores Xa Safety Harbor X St. Petersburg XB St. Pete Beach X Seminole X South Pasadena X Tarpon Springs X Treasure Island X Palm Harbor (uninc.) ~( East Lk.Tarpon (Unin.) X Greater Sem. (uninc.) X Xv Lealman (uninc.) X Tierra Verde (uninc., MSTU) X~ Remaining Uninc.Area X X 1 Belleair &Bellenir Bluffs operate together; z Served by Pinellas-Sunconst Independent Fire District; a Contracts for fire services w/Lenlmnn Fire District; ' Served by Seminole ~ Madeira Bench Fire Depts.; s FL Power b Lockheed Martin (uninc. area) ~ other uninc. areas contract w/Oldsmar; ° NW part of uninc. area served by Pinellas-Suncoast Independent Fire District, remainder by Seminole Fire District; ~ Served by St. Petersburg Fire District; s Gandy area served by St. Petersburg Fire District. NOTE: Trailer park in R Bench and a few small parcels in Oldsmar are uninc. but are nat part of official Fire District. NVENTORY OF AGREEMENTS The Inventory of Agreements that follows (Table 3) is organized by the required subject areas, in the same order provided in Chapter 163, F.S. The Inventory does not include absolutely every coordination agreement in place. For example, it does not include individual project agreements for specific capital projects like multi jurisdictional flood control projects, utility projects, or road projects or other agreements of limited duration. To include agreements to that level of detail among 25 local governments and special districts would become too unwieldy. The Inventory includes a variety of arrangements -including agreements between the county and individual municipalities, individual municipalities and another municipality, the county and several municipalities, the county and special districts, and municipalities and special districts. Every special district in the County is not represented in the Inventory. There are 36 special districts registered in Pinellas County. Following review of the information available from the State's website, for the purposes of this Report, only those Districts that provide a service related to the subject areas itemized in the Chapter 163, F.S., requirements are addressed in this Report.__ TABLE 3 Municipalities and Special Districts located in Pinellas County: Inventory of Existing and Proposed Agreements Note: This is where the Inventory goes -refer to separate handout for now UPLICATION OF SERVICES Table 4 identifies those duplications in services and facilities identified by individual reporting entities. A duplication is considered to occur when more than one service provider provides the same service or facility to a customer (e.g., for example, duplication may occur if geographic service areas overlap). TABLE 4 Identified Duplication of Services and Facilities Type of service Agreement Number (if applicable) Affected Reporting Entities Description of Duplication Potential Strategies to Address Dn licatlon Comments SERVICE DELIVERY DEFICIENCIES Table 5 identifies deficiencies in services, by type of service, as identified by individual reporting entity. A service delivery deficiency is generally represented by a gap in service delivery. For example, if a certain geographic area is not within the service area of any local government or district for one of the 8 identified services, then a service delivery gap may be evident, or where service delivery is not considered to be adequate, a deficiency may exist. TABLE 5 Identified Deficiencies in Service Delivery Type Agreement Affected Description Measure Potential Comments of Number Reporting of or Strategies service Entities Deficiency .Standard to used to Address ~'f applicable) Determine Deficienc Deficiency GREEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE UPDATED Table 6 identifies those agreements that have expired, but are considered to still be relevant and should therefore be updated. A timeline for updating the agreement is included where appropriate. TABLE 6 Needed Updates Parties to A reement Agreement Number Type of service Action re aired Comments OVERALL STRATEGIES TO HELP ELIMINATE DEFICIENCIES/DUPLICATION/GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY The following strategies will help facilitate solutions to identified deficiencies, duplication or gaps in service delivery. ^ Utilize the results of the Pinellas Assembly process and implement recommendations that are agreed to by the Municipalities and the County. ^ Local government preparation of Evaluation and Appraisal Reports and associated updates to comprehensive plans, including Intergovernmental Coordination Elements and Infrastructure-related Elements. ^ What else??? LATED FINDINGSlRESULTS FROM THE PINELLAS ASSEMBL Review/incorporate information on: public safety, recreation and transportation PPENDI any additional comments expressing an individual county, municipal or special district opinion service delivery report 2003 POLICY STATEMENT PINELLAS ASSEMBLY May 16 -18, 2002 Harborview Center Clearwater, Florida Planned by The Pinellas Assembly Steering Committee Sponsored by Pinellas County City of Clearwater City of Dunedin City of Gulfport City of Indian Rocks Beach City of Largo City of Madeira Beach City of Oldsmar City of Pinellas Park City of Safety Harbor City of St. Petersburg City of Seminole City of Tarpon Springs City of Treasure Island National Conference of Firemen and Oilers/ Local AFLCIO SEIU CLC Inc. St. Petersburg Association of Fire Fighters Tampa Bay Estuary Program Facilitated by Florida Atlantic University and Florida State University f ~ ~ ~.c i;, ~ V ~ a./ v i ':,W~ 2 ~uu't 8 P'NELLAS :~UNTV OEPAHTMENT OG aJy4NtNG _ POLICY STATEMENT PINELLAS ASSEMBLY At the close of their discussion, the participants of this Assembly reviewed and adopted as a group the following statement. The statement represents general agreement. However, no one was asked to sign it. Furthermore, it should not be assumed that every participant subscribes to every recommendation. I. I:vTI:tODUCTION A. This report is from the Pinellas Assembly, which was held at the Harborview Center in Clearwater on May 16-18, 2002. More than one hundred and thirty people participated, not including observers and Assembly staff. Participants were selected to reflect many aspects of the county, including government, business, civic groups, neighbofioods, religion, minorities, retirees, the environment, education, and others. B. The Assembly was facilitated by a political science professor from Florida State University and by the Florida Institute of Government at Florida Atlantic University. C. The Assembly was planned by a Steering Committee organized informally by the university facilitators. In consultation with the Assembly facilitators, the Steering Committee picked the date and location of the Assembly, identified the interests to be invited, selected the groups and individuals to represent those interests, and helped the facilitators write the questions to be addressed. D. The Assembly questions covered seven topics: Goals and principles for Pinellas governments; urban service delivery and financing; economic development and community redevelopment; intergovernmental relations; annexation; opportunities for intergovernmental cooperation; and steps to be taken next. II. GOALS AND PRINCIPLES FOR GOVERNMENTS IN PINELLAS COUNTY Governments in Pinellas County are facing circumstances unprecedented in Florida history. Pinellas is the first county in the state to be approaching the point where most of its land has been developed and its population growth has begun to slow down. During the decade of the 1950s, Pinellas County's population grew by 135 percent. In both the 1960s and 1970s, the decennial growth rates were 39 percent. In the 1980s, the rate dropped to 17 percent, and in the 1990s to 8 percent. A. The county's changing circumstances will require adjustments in both the process and substance of local government. Substantively, governments in Pinellas County will need to: . 1. Revise local land use planning and regulation to facilitate economic development and community redevelopment. 2. Build partnerships with federal and state governments to reduce unfunded mandates. 3. Protect the county's beaches and other natural resources. 4. Ensure an effective, trained, and available work force. 5. Maintain and promote the quality of life within the county. B. With respect to local government processes, the county's changing circumstances call for greater intergovernmental cooperation. Mutual accommodation, coordination, and perhaps functional consolidation will be needed to reduce waste, improve the county's competitive edge in the regional economy, and minimize unproductive intergovernmental conflict. 3 C. The difficulty will be to reduce overlap and enhance intergovernmental coordination while simultaneously accommodating many other legitimate considerations in addition to efficiency. The division of authority and responsibility between local governments, the established patterns of service delivery, the geographic layout of jurisdictional boundaries, the prior investments made by different communities, and similar matters of concern to local govemments are complicated and sensitive. Some methods for reducing duplication, preventing intergovemmental conflict, and increasing synergy may be suitable for some types of services or issues but not others, and in some parts of the county but not all. Progress will require sustained attention, ongoing communication, experimentation, and a high degree of trust. D. Given the urgency, complexity, and magnitude of the challenge, a formal communication process should be established between the municipal and county governments for discussing intergovernmental issues and opportunities. The process should be open, should allow for citizen input, and should give no single government or group of governments an advantage over others. E. As they look for ways to cooperate, share resources, eliminate duplication, and reduce costs, govemments in Pinellas County should observe the following principles: 1. All govemments in the county should be concerned about the county's quality of life, should commit to ongoing communication about intergovemmental issues, and should cooperate with one another to the maximum extent possible while remaining sensitive to local identities and interests. 4 2. Policies should include explicit considerations of fairness with respect to race. ethnicity, and all socio-economic classes. 3. Areawide consistency should be provided when there is a compelling need to do so. F. There are a number of examples of successful intergovernmental cooperation in Pinellas County, including: 1. Libraries. 2. Countywide fire dispatch. 3. Emergency Medical Services. 4. The Penny for Pinellas. 5. Cooperation between utilities on water supply. 6. Solid waste disposal (through the Waste to Energy facility). 7. Sheriff services provided under contract to cities. G. The policy areas where communication and cooperation have been less extensive include: 1. Transportation. 2. Water reclamation. 3. Refuse recycling. 4. Annexation. 5. Storm water management. 6. Code enforcement. H. Local governments in the county also need to address inequities in the assignment of taxes and fees across jurisdictions. Local governments and the 5 county should strive to achieve equity in the assignment of taxes and fees across jurisdictions and in the distribution of revenues and services. III. URBAN SERVICE DELIVERY AND FINANCING Governments in Pinellas County cooperate in many ways to deliver a wide range of urban services, and service levels and quality are well regarded. In some instances (e.g., water supply and recreation), cities deliver services to the unincorporated areas. In other cases (notably, law enforcement services from the Sheriffs Office), the county delivers urban services to one or more municipalities under a contract with each city. The County Commission also plays a coordinating and oversight role in such areas as land-use planning and fire protection. However, it maybe possible to lower costs, enhance effectiveness, and increase the equity of charges to consumers for cerfain services through consolidation or greater coordination. The difficulty is finding arrangements that achieve these benefits while still reflecting the service preferences of different communities and taking into account each community's prior investments in facilities and equipment. A. Historically, urban service delivery and financing have been addressed in Pinellas County through the process for reviewing and amending the County Charter. However, participants at the Pinellas Assembly recommend moving to issue-specific task forces of stakeholders for this purpose, so that action can be taken faster and consideration will be given to options that do not require charter amendments. The task forces should emphasize services, functions, and 6 funding rather than jurisdictional boundaries and focus on results rather than process. B. Task forces with broad representation from the cities, the county, unincorporated areas, labor, business, and consumer advocates should be established to examine the efficiencies of the following: 1. Fire protection/EMS services. A study should be conducted of fire services countywide to assess levels of service, costs, the distribution of costs and services, and related factors. The task force should evaluate the potential for savings, improved services, and more equitable assignment of costs from consolidating districts, having cities serve parts of the unincorporated area, and/or combining the city and county units into a single countywide fire protection system with uniform salary and benefit scales. If full consolidation is recommended, the task force should propose an approach and time-line for phasing it in. The task force should study EMS and evaluate whether costs might be lowered and/or performance improved by combining EMS with partially or fully consolidated fire protection services. 2. Recreation. The county government is under pressure to serve the growing youth population while also meeting the needs of seniors. A task force should evaluate the option of using county schools and other public buildings to host recreational services. The services could be provided by the county, by cities under contract with the county, or by cities through user charges. However, the services should be financed in such a way that unincorporated area residents pay the appropriate share of costs for services they receive. 7 3. Human and social services. The health care needs of indigent residents are a countywide issue and call for greater collaborative planning. 4. Creation of a separate public safety millage fee and/or assessment to fund fire, EMS, and law enforcement support services that are coup :•~ide. Savings may be possible by having the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office or other qualified law enforcement agencies provide certain law enforcement support services for Pinellas County police departments. The Sheriff already handles jails and corrections countywide under its mandate in the Florida Constitution. Other services that might be moved under the Sheriff's Office or other qualified law enforcement agencies include high-cost investigations, dispatching, and data management. Funding these and related services with a separate millage, fee, and/or assessment might promote coordination across fire, EMS, and law enforcement and might give citi2ens a clearer picture of what they receive for what they pay. 5. Transportation services and planning. 6. Building inspection services. 7. Water reclamation. 8. Solid waste collection. Pinellas County should pursue opportunities to contract with municipalities for the provision of solid waste services. 9. Master drainage basins. 10. Law enforcement support services. 11. Refuse recvcling. 8 12. Unified insurance for county municipal and special district employees and agencies countywide 13. Coordinated purchasing of goods and services countywide IV. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT With population growth slowing, govemments in Pinellas County will need to focus on economic development and redevelopment to maintain a vibrant economy. Several studies have concluded that redevelopment will occur naturally throughout the county, but that more and betfer redevelopment will happen if it is facilitated and guided by Pinellas govemments. A. The county and city govemments should work collaboratively with the business community and the Chambers of Commerce to develop countywide plans for economic development and redevelopment. The planning process and the plan itself should be inclusive; all local governments should be involved in formulating the plan and the plan should recognize the municipalities' vital role in business recruitment and retention, development approval, infrastructure maintenance, etc. At a minimum, the plans should consider: 1. Community distinctiveness. The plan should be sensitive to the preservation of the special character of each community and its economic development and redevelopment priorities. 2. Business retention as well as on recruitment. Existing and new businesses need to be supported through education and promotion of community assets and incentives. 9 3. Small business. The vast majority of businesses in Pinellas County are small. This is likely to always be true, given the county's appeal to tourists and its significant retirement population, both of which tend to support small businesses in the service sector of the economy. 4. CRA criteria. Community Redevelopment Agencies may allow tax increment financing, which requires revenues generated by increased property values in the CRA to be reinvested back into the CRA's district. The plan should include criteria for creating, evaluating the effectiveness of, and dissolving Community Redevelopment Agencies to assure that plan implementation furthers the improvement of the area and makes efficient use of resources. Consideration should be given to the cumulative impact of tax increment financing on the county's budget as well as the municipal need to fund redevelopment. However, continuing support for tax increment financing is important. 5. Impacts across racial, ethnic, and socio-economic QroupinQS. Community redevelopment can sometimes be detrimental to low-income residents because it raises property values and causes a corresponding increase in taxes and rents, which may be beyond the means of the current residents. The referenced countywide economic development plans should include policies to help the community benefits of redevelopment be shared by local residents of all backgrounds and income levels. These plans should promote and reflect equity as much as possible in spending across communities. 10 6. Community-driven redevelopment. The plan should recognize that redevelopment is generated not only by investors but also by communities. The plan should include policies to support neighborhood initiatives such as beautification, home maintenance, office and home expansions, and other projects. 7. Affordable housing. Economic development plans should provide an element for countywide provision of affordable housing. B. In addition to developing a countywide plan, the county and city governments need to take the following actions to maintain the county's economic prosperity in the face of declining growth rates: 1. Address problems with building codes. The interpretation and enforcement of building codes need to become more uniform across jurisdictions. Also, state laws and rules governing building and rebuilding need to be adjusted to accommodate the special issues associated with existing structures. As it stands, many requirements associated with rebuilding and remodeling often make redevelopment too expensive to be practical. 2. Revise the local svstem of land-development regulation. The existing land development codes and the system of land use planning and regulation were designed more to regulate new development than to promote redevelopment. The codes and system need to be made more flexible and to allow "regulation for results." 3. Refurbish aging infrastructure. Aging infrastructure is harming the county's ability to compete for business regionally and nationally. 4. Inform the citizenry. Residents need to be told about the county's changing conditions and what the new conditions mean for government services, business opportunities, fiscal pressures, and similar factors. 5. Ensure that the education system is responsive to the needs of business and industry. 6. Review revenue limitations and maximize utilization of existing revenue ca aci 7. Apply local revenues to serve as a catalyst for private development and redevelopment. 8. Develop activities and programs to enhance and reinforce the tourist industry. V. GOVERNING INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Although Florida is one of the nation's most urban states, it has no urban policy, that is, no set of goals for its metropolitan areas or principles for managing these areas so as to achieve certain ends. In the absence of state direction, local governments in each county must work out a policy on their own. The Assembly participants were asked to analyze Pinellas County in terms of four alternative urban policy models: !. Atwo-tiered system. ~ In this model, the county delivers certain services countywide at a regional or suburban intensity, while cities handle most 12 urban services. Unincorporated area residents are encouraged to form new cities or be annexed. Z. City-county consolidation. The county government and all or some of the municipalities are consolidated into a single government. 3. Functional consolidation. In this approach, certain countywide issues and services are selected for special treatment, and units of government separate from both the cities and the county are established to handle them independently. 4. Municipal expansion. In this model, the county's largest cities are encouraged to grow in population and also geographically through annexation, and these large cities provide services to other cities and to unincorporated area residents around them. This approach might also include merging cities. A. The existing urban policy framework in Pinellas County evolved partly by design and partly by happenstance in response to rapid growth, specific issues, and political practicalities. As it stands, the framework in Pinellas comes closest to a two-tiered system, but it also includes elements of other models as well. 1. As in the two-tiered model, the County Charter assigns to the county responsibility for handling many functions countywide, including, for example, tax collection, election administration, property appraisal, jails, courts, environmental management, and more. However, responsibilities for many other services have not been clearly divided between the county and the 13 cities, and the county delivers a number of urban services in the unincorporated areas. 2. Typically, city-county consolidation is considered only in counties where there is one large city and the county government is delivering few urban services. Hence city-county consolidation has not been considered in Pinellas County because Pinellas has so many cities. However, there has been an instance where two cities merged into one. 3. A variant of functional consolidation has been applied to growth management. The Pinellas County Charter designates the County Commission to sit as the Pinellas Countywide Planning Authority, which can override municipal land use plans unless the latter calls for lower densities than the countywide plan. This countywide planning and growth management function was augmented in 2000 to include a mandated process to help avoid inter-city disputes over voluntary annexations. B. The blended policy framework in Pinellas County has some benefits, but most Assembly participants report that the system is in need of significant reform. The benefits of the existing system are several. It offers flexibility for delivering different services at varying intensities to different communities, depending on local needs, preferences, and financial resources. In so doing, it allows for competition between service providers, which helps keep costs down. The framework also includes a mechanism for countywide land use planning. C. However, a large majority of the Assembly participants report that many intergovernmental issues remain. They are also concerned that these issues will 14 intensify as resources become increasingly scarce. The problems now visible include: 1. Ineouities in paving for services. Many believe that services in the unincorporated areas are being subsidized by countywide taxes. Also, unincorporated area and non-residents may benefit from city services without having to pay for those services. 2. Border conflicts. With the approval of the landowner, cities can annex contiguous land within their planning area, even though the annexation may divide an established community in the unincorporated area, create problems for the county in delivering services to the surrounding unincorporated area, and harm the county's financial situation. Conversely, the cities have no control over land use decisions in the unincorporated area by the County Commission even though the decisions often impact the cities' quality of life. 3. Enclaves and related problems. The geographic layout of municipal borders sometimes defies common sense and creates problems for planning, policing, and service delivery. Some cities have large numbers of unincorporated enclaves that are totally contained, like the hole of a donut. 4. Spillover effects. The tensions caused by annexation issues, perceptions of financial inequities, and related matters undermine trust and make it difficult for local governments to work together for the common good. D. Assembly participants expressed many opinions about how to improve the county's urban policy framework. The suggestions ranged from making minor improvements in coordination and communication to completely overhauling the 15 system of local government finance and service delivery. Notwithstanding this diversity of opinion, there was widespread support for the following recommendations: 1. A division of roles and responsibilities between the county and the cities, as envisioned in the two-tiered model, but roles and responsibilities do need to be more clearly delineated and embraced. 2. All governments should work collaboratively to create a service delivery model that provides quality services to all county residents in acost-effective manner. In general, county government should have a countywide orientation and should handle services that can be delivered countywide at a regional or suburban intensity, while cities should handle most urban services where feasible and cost effective. 3. Clarifying the city and county roles in service delivery will require changes in the way services are financed and managed in the unincorporated area. Three options should be considered: a. Unincorporated area residents should be encouraged through verifiable information to form new cities or be annexed by an existing city; b. The county, cities, and unincorporated area residents must collaborate to devise a system of Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTU) and Municipal Service Benefit Units (MSBU) to assure that the costs of government services are equitably distributed; and/or 16 c. Special legislation could be developed to allow unincorporated area communities to form local governments that have limited powers but are not burdened with all the responsibilities and costs of Florida cities. 4. The initiative to clarify city and county roles and responsibilities must also address enclaves. All enclaves within municipal boundaries in Pinellas County should be annexed. If this is not achievable, enclaves should be served and assessed by the adjacent city for the cost of providing urban services. 5. The Assembly participants proposed several ways to go about reforming the urban policy framework in the county. The suggestions included: a. Using inter-local agreements; b. Conducting a scientific survey of the electorate, which could also ask unincorporated area residents countywide whether they want to be annexed, be incorporated, or remain unincorporated; and/or c. Seeking a special act of the Florida Legislature. VI. ANNEXATION A. Many Assembly participants stated that the key to improving intergovernmental relations and service delivery in the county is refining local policies and attitudes toward annexation. Some participants also argued that annexation is the single most important issue discussed at the Assembly, and that it should be the focus in subsequent efforts to carry out the Assembly's recommendations. t7 B. The Assembly discussions revealed that annexation is a contentious issue, because annexation decisions involve difficult choices with far reaching implications. When a city is bordered by a large unincorporated area, the city will experience costs and other impacts from the unincorporated population. On the other hand, an extension of city borders affects not only the annexing city and the unincorporated area residents being annexed, but also other county residents and governments. It may reduce the revenues of the county government and special districts and ~ y lead to an increase in the taxes and fees imposed on the remaining unincorporated area (if county MSTU revenues are lost). A single annexation can also have implications for future annexations, which may magnify its significance. C. The existing annexation policy in Pinellas County must be refined and extended to address these uncertainties. The necessary reforms should be formulated by a task force with representation from the county, cities, and unincorporated communities. The reforms should: 1. Provide education regarding annexation and/or other viable alternatives through the coordinated distribution of information. 2. Clarify the annexation process that includes city, county, and affected property owners. 3. Encourage annexation and service consolidation in designated circumstances where feasible and cost effective for residents. 4. Address voluntary and involuntary annexation issues. 18 5. Be consistent with the policy for clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the county and cities, with the county emphasizing matters of regional and countywide significance 6. When applicable, include a formula or some other mechanism for balancing shifts in taxable values. 7. Eliminate all unincorporated enclaves in Pinellas municipalities. (An enclave is unincorporated land that is fully enclosed within the borders of a single municipality.) D. The Board of County Commissioners should be the voice of county-wide interests as well as the unincorporated areas but in a balanced way. VII. TARGETS OF OPPORTUNITY A. When the full spectrum of intergovernmental relations in Pinellas County is considered, many examples of successful cooperation stand out. When Pinellas governments choose to cooperate, as they often do, they achieve excellent results. It is important not to lose sight of this when considering issues like annexation. B. Examples of successful cooperation include: • The Tampa Bay Estuary Program • Tampa Bay Water • Coastal Construction Control Line/ FEMA Links • Sheriffs Contracts with Municipalities • FIRE and EMS Services 19 e Library Cooperative o Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Agency on Bay Management o Gulf Boulevard Beautification 0 2010 Vision Effort o Resource Recovery Plant o Countywide Business Assistance e U.S. 19 Task Force o Manufactured Home Task Force e Clearwater Memorial Causeway Bridge o Penny for Pinellas o Pinellas Trail o Beach Programs e St. Petersburg -Clearwater Airport 0 911 System e Disaster Preparedness o The Final Four o The Juvenile Welfare Board o The Planned Skateboard Park o Epicenter Business Resource Center e Convention and Visitors Bureau/Tourist Development Council C. There are a number of areas where intergovernmental cooperation might prove fruitful. Of special importance are: 20 1. Securing support from appropriate state agencies and the state legislature to reduce unfunded mandates, allow greater flexibility in local government spending, amend Florida building codes to allow more flexibility in redevelopment, and recognize government insurance consortia. 2. Modifying land use codes to facilitate economic development and community redevelopment. 3. Improving the transportation system by funding Gulf Boulevard and other necessary transportation projects, working on traffic signal synchronization, etc. 4. Promoting tourism by coordinating cultural events and establishing a common events calendar. 5. Creating and implementing a countywide transportation department that will include all modes of transportation including the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. 6. Additional support for indigent health care and other social services. 7. Encouraging partnerships with the school system for transportation, after care, recreation, and use of facilities. 8. Solving problems related to transportation and the school choice plan. 21 VIII. NEXT STEPS A. The Board of County Commissioners and the Council of Mayors shall create an executive committee to decide: 1. The composition of the various task forces. 2. Topics to be addressed by the task forces. 3. Timelines in which topics addressed. The Pinellas Assembly Steering Committee shall provide staff support to the executive committee. B. The overall conclusion of this Assembly is that the roles and responsibilities of the county and cities need to be divided more clearly. The system of local government is sound, but adjustments are necessary to eliminate unproductive conflict, increase efficiency, enhance service quality, and correct inequities in the distribution of costs. 1. The authority and responsibility of the County Commission should be focused on matters of countywide significance and should be reinforced by Charter amendments where necessary. The County Commission should take the lead in growth management, economic development, storm water management, arts and cultural activities, disaster preparation, and similar functions in need of a countywide orientation. 2. Policies and ordinances should be adopted to support the role of cities in providing most urban services, both to their own residents and to - -; unincorporated area residents where feasible and cost-effective. Of special significance in this regard is revising the existing annexation policy. 22 3. This sorting of roles and responsibilities should be implemented so as to allow continued flexibility in service delivery where it has proven beneficial. A good example is the Sheriffs contracts with a number of cities. 4. The county policy toward unincorporated areas should respect the identity of established communities and balance their interests in self-determination with regional and countywide needs for coherent systems of service delivery, equitable assignment of costs, and economically sustainable municipalities C. To assist the public in understanding the challenges confronting their local governments, the County should provide the public with information explaining the issues that were discussed at the Assembly and the solutions that were proposed. D. Within one year, the Pinellas Assembly should be reconvened to assess progress in implementing these recommendations and to consider any new issues that may have arisen. 23 PItiELLaS .-~SSEitBLY" STEEIti`G CO~I~IITTEE Chief James Angle Palm Harbor Fire Department Askia Muhammad Aquil Executive Director, St. Petersburg Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. Alan C. Bornstein President, Creative Contractors Inc. Michael P. Bonfield City Manager, City of St. Pete Beach Tom Brobeil City Manager, City of Indian Rocks Beach Stephen J. Cottrell Town Manager, Town of Belleair Charles S. Coward City Manager, City of Treasure Island Dick Eckenrod Executive Director, Tampa Bay Estuary Program Frank P. Edmunds City Manager, City of Seminole Benjamin D. Ellis, Sr. President/CEO, Ellis & Ellis Associates Tish Elston Deputy Mayor/City Administrator, City of St. Petersburg Richard R. Feinberg, Jr. President, St. Petersburg Association of Fire Fighters Rodney S. Fischer Executive Director, Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board Maureen Freaney Assistant City Manager, City of Dunedin Bruce T. Haddock City Manager, City of Oldsmar David P. Healey Executive Director, Pinellas Planning Council William B. Horne II City Manager, Ciry of Clearwater Robert E. Lee City Manager, Ciry of Gulfport Wayne Logan, Jr. City Manager, City of Safety Harbor James M. Madden Ciry Manager, City of Madeira Beach Raymond H. Neri President, Lealman Community Association Ellen S. Posivach City Manager, City of Tarpon Springs Manny L. Pumariega Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Thomas Ramsberger, Esquire Trenam, Kemker Lt. Carol Rasor Pinellas County Sheriff's Office Jack Rimkus Darryl Rouson, Esquire President, NAACP-St. Petersburg Branch Brian Smith Executive Director, Metropolitan Planning Organization Stephen Spratt County Administrator, Pinellas County Steven B. Stanton City Manager, City of Largo Dr. John Stewart Deputy Superintendent, School Board of Pinellas County Roger Sweeney Director, Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Fred Winters President, NCF&O/SEIU Local #1220 PItiELLAS ASSEMBLY May 16 - 18, 2002 Harborview Center Clearwater, Florida ATTENDEES Muhammad Abdur-Rahim Board Member North Greenwood Association 1028 North Madison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 Rusty Belcher Senior Minister First United Methodist Church 411 Turner Street Clearwater, FL 33756 James Angle Fire Chief Palm Harbor Fire Department 250 West Lake Road Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Askia Muhammad Aquil Executive Director St. Petersburg Neighborhood Housing Serv., Inc. 1640 Martin Luther King South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Chris Arbutine, Sr. Mayor City of Belleau Bluffs 115 Florence Drive Belleau Bluffs, FL 33770 Ray "Bift" Baker Vice Chair Feather Sound Community Services District, Inc. 14835 Feather Cove Lane Clearwater, FL 33762 Richard "Rick" Baker Mayor City of St. Petersburg P.O. Box 2842 St. Petersburg, FL 33731 Jerald "Jerry" Beverland Mayor City of Oldsmar 100 State Street West Oldsmar, FL 34677 Nancy E. Biesinger Vice President, Gov. Affairs and Public Relations Franklin Affiliates, Inc. 885 Monte Cristo Boulevard Tierra Verde, FL 33715 Barbara Blush Commissioner City of Treasure Island 120 107th Avenue Treasure Island, FL 33706 Alan C. Bornstein President Creative Contractors, Inc. 620 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Michael Bonfield City Manager City of St. Pete Beach 155 Corey Avenue St. Pete Beach, FL 33706 Thomas E. "Tom" Brobeil C~tv ~tanaQer City of [ndian Rocks Beach 1507 Bay Palm Boulevard Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 Harry W. Brodhead Council Member City of Gulfport 2401 53rd Street South Gulfport, FL 33707 Sue M. Brooks President North County Sheriffs Community Council 1638 Shetland Terrace Dunedin, FL 34698 Lynne Brown Artist/Historian 6344 9th Avenue South Gulfport, FL 33707 Rick Butler Council Member City of Pinellas Park 5141 78th Avenue North Pinellas Park, FL 33780 Deborah B. Clark Supervisor of Elections Pinellas County 315 Court Street, Room 117 Clearwater, FL 33756 James F. Coats Chief Deputy Pinellas County Sheriffs Office 10750 Ulmerton Road Largo, FL 33778 Sandy Colbert Chair, Community Advisory Committee Tampa Bay Estuary Program 6601 1st Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33710 Stephen J. Cottrell Town ~tana~er Town of Belleau 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Belleau, FL 33756 David Daiker President Pinellas County Council of Firefighters 12945 Seminole Boulevard, Bldg. 2, Suite 16 Largo, FL 33778 James Dates Director of Justice Coordination Pinellas County 311 Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Connie Davis President/CEO Greater Palm Harbor Area Chamber of Commerce 1 151 Nebraska Avenue Palm Harbor, FL 34683 John W. Day, III Board Member City of Largo Library 2112 Egret Drive Clearwater, FL 33764 Karleen F. DeBlaker Clerk of the Circuit Court Pinellas County 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Rick DelGreco 6286 10th Avenue South Gulfport, FL 33707 Frank DiDonato Mayor City of Tarpon Springs 324 East Pine Street Tarpon Springs, FL 34688 Robert H. Di~iicola Beth Eschenfelder titayor Executive Director Citv of Indian Rocks Beach The Mustard Seed 1 ~0- Bay Palm Blvd. 2~ 10 Central Avenue Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 St. Petersburg, FL 33712 Dick Eckenrod Richard Feinberg Executive Director President Tampa Bay Estuary Program St. Petersburg Association of Fire Fighters 100 8th Avenue S.E., MSI-l/NEP 5240 1st Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 St. Petersburg, FL 33710 Frank P. Edmunds Rodney S. Fischer City Manager Executive Director City of Seminole Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board 7464 Ridge Road 11701 Belcher Road, Suite 102 Seminole, FL 33772 Largo, FL 33773 Dave Eggers A. Brent Fisher Chair President Dunedin Chamber of Commerce Council of Neighborhood Associations 301 Main Street P.O. Box 3529 Dunedin, FL 34698 St. Petersburg, FL 33731 Benjamin D. Ellis, Sr. Larry Foerster President/CEO Commissioner Ellis & Ellis Associates Town of Redington Shores 1228 7th Avenue South 17425 Gulf Boulevard St. Petersburg, FL 33705 Redington Shores, FL 33708 Tish Elston Sally H. Foote Deputy Mayor/City Administrator Attorney City of St. Petersburg Thompson & Foote, P.A. 175 Fifth Street North 1150 Cleveland Street, Suite 301 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Clearwater, FL 33755 Terry England David "Bill" Foster Secretary/Treasurer Council Member England Brothers Construction Co., Inc. City of St. Petersburg 12255 75th Street North P.O. Box 2842 Largo, FL 33773 St. Petersburg, FL 33731 C. Susan Englander Maureen "Mo" Freaney PresidentlCEO Assistant Ciry Manager EEI City of Dunedin 703 Grand Central Street P. O. Box 1348 Clearwater, FL 33756 Dunedin, FL 34697 «~ard J. Eriszolowsi Mayor City of St. Pete Beach 155 Corey Avenue St. Pete Beach, FL 33706 Nicholas Fritsch Sand Key Civic Association 1310 Gulf Boulevard, #8-D Clearwater, FL 33767 Gay IZ Gentry Retired Teacher 3072 Keene Park Drive Largo, FL 33771 Housh Gbovaee President Northside Engineering 304 South Belcher Road, Suite C Clearwater, FL 33765 Barbara Green Executive Director Everybody's Tabernacle/Homeless Emerg. Project 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 Bruce T. Haddock City Manager City of Oldsmar 100 State Street West Oldsmar, FL 34677 Hoyt Hamilton Commissioner City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Roy G. Harrell, Jr. Attorney Holland & Knight LLP 200 Central Avenue, Suite 1600 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Calvin D. Harris Commtssioner Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Donald E. Hazelton, Jr. President Fed. of Manufactured Homeowners of FL, Inc. 7501 142nd Avenue North, Lot 357 Largo, FL 33771 David P. Healey Executive Director Pinellas Planning Council 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 Clearwater, FL 33755 Fred Held Mayor City of South Pasadena 7047 Sunset Drive South South Pasadena, FL 33707 Joan Herndon Council Member Town of Indian Shores 19305 Gulf Boulevard Indian Shores, FL 33785 Janice B. Hill Health Services Administrator Pinellas County Sheriffs Office 11541 Shipwatch Drive, #1015 Largo, FL 33774 Chrys Holmes Vice Chair MPO-Pedestrian Transportation Adv. Comm. 822 Brandywine Drive Largo, FL 33771 Gloria S. Hope 900 Peninsula Avenue Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 ~; illiam B. Horne. II Cite titanager City of Clearwater l 12 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Timothy Ingold President Fraternal Order of Police 441 Corvette Drive Largo, FL 33771 Robert E. Jackson Mayor City of Largo 201 Highland Avenue Largo, FL 33764 Jimmy Johnson Executive Director Seminole Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 3337 Seminole, FL 33777 Joseph T. Jorgensen President Travel Resort Services, Inc. 13030 Gulf Boulevard Madeira Beach, FL 33708 Nancy Kaylor Community Volunteer 1722 Cypress Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 Ann Kelley Clinical Director Directions for Mental Health, Inc. 1437 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33764 Robert "Bob" Kersteen Retired GTE Wireless Real Estate Executive Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 2821 61st Lane North St. Petersburg, FL 33710 Sidney Klein Chiet or Police Clearwater Police Department 6~1~ Pierce Street Clearwater, FL 33756 ti. ,tilicbael Kouskoutis Attorney & Chair, Gov. Affairs Comm. Tarpon Springs Chamber of Commerce 35 West Lemon Street Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 Carl M. Kuttler, Jr. President St. Petersburg College P.O. Box 13489 St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Henry S. Kwoh President H. S. Kwoh & Associates, Inc. 275 96th Avenue North, Suite 1 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Deborah Kynes Commissioner City of Dunedin P.O. Box 1348 Dunedin, FL 34697 Susan Latvala Commissioner Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 3 i 5 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Robert E. Lee City Manager City of Gulfport 2401 53rd Street South Gulfport, FL 33707 Tony Leisner President Waters Edge Properties 1350 Riverside Avenue Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 l~athleen Quinn Litton Commissioner Lealman Fire District 7701 40th Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33709 Wayne Logan, Jr. City Manager City of Safety Harbor 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 James M. Madden City Manager City of Madeira Beach 300 Municipal Drive Madeira Beach, FL 33708 R. Donald Mastry Executive Partner Holland & Knight LLP 200 Central Avenue, Suite 1600 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Jerry L. Maxwell General Manager Tampa Bay Water 2535 Landmark Drive, Suite 211 Clearwater, FL 33761 James E. Mills Executive Director Juvenile Welfare Board of Pinellas County 6698 68th Avenue North, Suite A Pinellas Park, FL 33781 John Morroni Commissioner Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Jerry Mudd City Manager City of Pinellas Park P.O. Box 1100 Pinellas Park, FL 33780 Rav Neri President Lealman Community Association 4361 45th Street North Lealman, FL 33714 Nadine S. Nickeson Chair Pinellas Planning Council 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Jack Olsen CEO Southern Home Care 340 49th Street South St. Petersburg, FL 33707 Thomas L. Olson Finance Board Member Town of Belleair 450 Althea Road Belleair, FL 33756 John B. Parham, Jr. Assistant to the City Manager City of Largo P.O. Box 296 Largo, FL 33779 Harold M. Paxton, Jr. Pastor Advent Christian Church 5800 58th Street North Kenneth City, FL 33709 Lorraine Pelosi Owner and Founder Wellington Schools of Pinellas County 209 Scotland Street Dunedin, FL 34689 Ken Peluso Palm Harbor Fire Comm./Community Service 36949 U.S. Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Ellen S. Posi~ach John .a. Robertson ~;~~ ~ianaeer ~la~,or City of Tarpon Spnngs Town of Belleau Shore P. O. Box X004 1200 Gulf Boulevard Tarpon Springs, FL 34688 Belleau Shore. FL 33786 Judith Powers-Jones Darryl Rouson Executive Director President Pinellas County Arts Council NAACP-St. Petersburg Branch 14700 Terminal Boulevard, Suite 229 3110 1st Avenue North, Suite 5-W Clearwater, FL 33762 St. Petersburg, FL 33713 Manny T. Pumariega Peggy Sanchez Milts Executive Director CEO Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council YWCA of Tampa Bay 9455 Koger Boulevard. Suite 219 655 Second Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL 33702 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Geraldine Raja C. W. Sanders 501 Laguna Drive President Tierra Verde, FL 33715 MDG, Inc. 2980 Alton Drive Thomas M. Ramsberger St. Pete Beach, FL 33706 Attorney Trenam Kemker Law Firm Karen Seel 200 Central Ave., Suite 1230 Commissioner St. Petersburg, FL 33710 Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street Irene Rausch Clearwater, FL 33756 Executive Director Palm Harbor Senior Activity Center Roger F. Sellew 1500 16th Street Managing Director Palm Harbor, FL 34683 Sellew & Assoc. 967 Bayshore Drive Albert Redman, Jr. Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 12112 Kay Drive Seminole, FL 33772 Art Shand Principal Dottie K. Reeder Aude, Shand & Williams, Inc. AIA Mayor 19353 US Highway 19 North, Suite 101 City of Seminole Clearwater, FL 33764 7464 Ridge Road Seminole, FL 33772 Jim Sheets Recreation Director Everett Rice City of Seminole Sheriff 9100 113th Street Pinellas County Seminole, FL 33772 10750 Ulmerton Road Largo, FL 33778 Michael J. Siebel Director of Plann~n¢ Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority 14830 49th Street North Clearwater, FL 33762 Barbara J. Smith Member City of Largo Finance Advisory Board 12241 Eldon Drive Largo, FL 33774 Brian Smith Executive Director Metropolitan Planning Organization 14 South Fort Harrison Avenue, Suite 2000 Clearwater, FL 33756 Howard H. Smith P. O. Box 900 Largo, FL 33779 William B. Smith Mayor Town of Kenneth City 6000 54th Avenue North Kenneth City, FL 33709 Stephen M. Spratt County Administrator Pinellas County 315 Court Street, Suite 601 Clearwater, FL 33756 Jay S. Stagg Member Pedestrian TransportatiorrCommittee 1400 Gulf Boulevard, Apt. 305 Clearwater, FL 33767 Debbie Stambaugh President/CEO Tampa Bay Beaches Chamber of Commerce 6990 Gulf Boulevard St. Pete Beach, FL 33706 Steven B. Stanton City Manager City of Largo P.O. Box 296 Largo, FL 33779 John A. Stewart Deputy Superintendent Pinellas County Schools P. O. Box 2942 Largo, FL 33779 Robert B. Stewart Commissioner Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Ralph Stone Assistant Ciry Manager City of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Jake Stowers Assistant County Administrator Pinellas County 315 Court Street, 6th Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Jan Sturgis Commissioner City of Madeira Beach 300 Municipal Drive Madeira Beach, FL 33708 Thomas Tafelski President Thomas Construction 1284 t 66th Street North Largo, FL 33773 L. Duke Tiernan President South Clearwater Citizens for Progressive Action 1120 Kingsley Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Barbara Sheen Todd Chair Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 John Toppe Executive Vice President Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe Architects 2714 9th Street North St. Petersburg, FL 33704 Ernst Upmeyer Commissioner Town of Belleair 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Belleair, FL 33756 Elizabeth "Lisa" Valencia President Eastlake Oaks Homeowners Association 1731 Split Fork Drive Oldsmar, FL 34677 Michael R. Van 13utsel Projects Director Beers Skanska Inc. 4950 West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 600 Tampa, FL 33609 Thomas C. Wedekind Executive Director Pinellas Emergency Mental Health Services 11254 58th Street North Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Kenneth T. Welch Commissioner Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Frederick D. Winters President NCFTO/SEIU Local #1220 664 63rd Street South St. Petersburg, FL 33733 `tars: ~L oodard -asst..-~dm~nistrator. ~t_Tmt. snd Bocce; Pinellas County 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Keith Zavac Vice Mayor City of Safety Harbor 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 TIMELINE AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING A COUNTYWIDE INTERLOCAL SERVICE DELIVERY AGREEMENT REPORT Identify Municipal and Special District contacts -July/August 2003 Mail-out draft inventory of service delivery agreements prepared by County staff to Municipal and Special District contacts for review -July/August 2003 Based on review and comment by Municipal and Special District contacts, County staff to complete inventory of County, Municipal and Special District service delivery agreements (includes agreements between County and any service provider ns well as between Municipality and any service provider) - September 2003 Provide final draft of inventory to contacts for final review. Provide draft (text) overview of existing coordination mechanisms to Municipal and Special District contacts -September/October 2003 Revise text based on input from Municipal and Special District contacts - September/October 2003 County, Municipal and Special District contacts evaluate inventory and text to see if there are any areas of overlap or duplication of services, or any service delivery gaps or deficiencies, etc.) - SeptemberlOctober 2003 County staff collects and compiles input from contacts on any areas of overlap or deficiencies; compiled summary sent back to contacts for review - October 2003 Monitor Pinellas Assembly Workgroups re: identifying/evaluating service delivery issues/deficiencies -July through December 2003 Review and summarize relevant findings and recommendations from Assembly process (i.e., "package" the minutes, results, etc.) -November 2003 County staff to organize inventory, text, Assembly results and any identified service delivery issues/deficiencies into n collective Report; sent back to contacts for final review and sign off -November 2003 Submit summary of agreements/text summary and compilation of issues in a Report to DCA -December 2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party l Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date. Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement Education Pinellas School Board ILA 9/10/96 30 days notice Provides an alternative process and location criteria for reviewing a proposed public educational facility and site plan. Education Pinellas County, School Board ILA 5/1/03 N/A Joint School Board/ Local Government Clearwater, Dunedin, Coordination regarding new Ch. 163, Florida Gulfport, Largo, Madeira Statute requirements. Beach, Oldsmar, Pinellas Park, Safety Harbor, Seminole, St. Petersburg, St. Pete Beach, and Tarpon Springs Education Pinellas County City of Madeira Public Library 9/10/ 1 9/3 2013 Beach Cooperative Education Gulf Beaches Public City of Madeira Lease agreeme 2/1 /73 1/31 2016 Library Beach Education St. Petersburg College City o adeira Prec pto P gran 6/1 99 tten otic Beac ws s d o ays before the ob in neces ry first day of clin' al and nds August of any o experie ce in given year or er to et the req firemen s of the E S progr Fire Dept continuing education Sanitary Sewer Clearwater afety Harbor [LA 11/1/99 N/A Clearwater is providing wastewater treatement and wants Safety Harbor to regulate disposal by adopting and enforcing sewer regulations. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Redington Shores ILA 3/1/01 25 years County to treat the Town's wastewater. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 10/22/76 35 years Clearwater to take wastewater from Safety Harbor. Sanitary Sewer Largo St. Petersburg ILA 6/23/00 l0 years Largo to service parts of St. Petersburg. 9/ 15/20(13 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Safety Harbor ILA 8/1/88 7/31/2018 Parties had 3 previous contracts: 2 dated 10/22/76 and I dated 9/23/81. This agreement permits Safety Harbor to increase its sewage capacity. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Tarpon Springs ILA 8/8/78 1/1/2000 To define the boundaries of sanitary sewer service areas. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Indian Shores Implementation 10/12/82 N/A Pinellas purchased Indian Shores sanitary sewer Agreement system. Sanitary Sewer Clearwater Largo [LA 10/1/83 10/1/1988 (+ To create a common sanitary sewer service automatic boundary. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Dunedin Clearwater II_A 11/28/79 11/28/84 (+ 5 "fo define the boundaries of wholesale and retail automatic sanitary sewer service areas. additional 5 yr. terms) Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Madeira Beach ILA 7/22/69 30 years Madeira pays portion of debt on South Cross Bayou Pollution Control Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. "['his agreement is still being honored even though it has expired. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas North Redington ILA 3/14/72 30 years N.Redington Beach to pay portion of the debt on Beach the South Cross Bayou Pollution Control Facility and fair share of operation and maintenance costs. Expired. Sanitary Sewer Oldsmar Pinellas ILA 12/11/79 20 years NE Pinellas County Sewer and Waste Authority, Inc. also signed agreement. Oldsmar treats wastewater for County. Expired. Sanitary Sewer Oldsmar Pinellas County [LA 3/19/98 20 years Service areas established. Oldsmar agrees to treat 550,000 gpd. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Pinellas Park ILA 3/12/97 30 years St. Pete to provide wastewater treatment to the parts of Gateway Center within Pinellas Park (Gateway Center Development). Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Belleau Beach ILA 9/25/01 25 yrs. Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Belleau ILA Spring 2003 No expiration Belleau seeks to tum over its infrastructure to the date County. 9/ I S/20111 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service,: Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreemen :Effective Date of Expiration Date - Description/Notes .: ,.E ,_ , Agreement of Agreement Sanitary Sewer Pinellas [ndian Rocks Beach (LA 9/25/01 25 years Wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal agreement. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Treasure Island ILA 1/3/84 1/3/2009 St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from Treasure Island at the Northwest Treatment Plant. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg St. Pete Beach ILA 2/19/85 St. Petersburg will treat the wastewater flow from SL Pete Beach at the Northwest Treatment Plant. Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg South Pasadena ILA 12/27/74 12/27/2004 South Pasadena will pay St. Petersburg for transmission of sanitary sewage. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas St. Petersburg ILA i l/11/87 mutual agreement County requested to pump sewage wastes created in FL De Soto Park to the City for treatment. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas Redington Shores ILA 3/1/01 25 years Sanitary Sewer Pinellas St Petersburg ILA 6/26/64 40 years St. Petersburg will treat wastewater from unincorporated areas of the County -Bear Creek. Expires next year. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County City of Madeira Wastewater 3/2/01 03/01/26 Beach transmission, termination 25 treatment and years after the 1st disposal services 2 years. City may terminate the Agreement with 180 days written notice Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County City of Madeira Repay Pinellas 3/13/79 2004 Beach County for the cost of constructing modified gravity flow sewer, metering facilities and appurtenances Sanitary Sewer St. Petersburg Gulfport Amendment 2/10/70 5 years Gulfport was transporting wastewater from un- - incorporated areas; it intended to annex to St. Petersburg (there is 1 agreement and 2 amendments for this). 9/ I i/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement Public Safely Pinellas Medical Direction Contract 3/7/01 12/29/2003 The contractor will provide professional medical (Emergency Contractor (doctor) direction to the EMS system. Service) Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Tarpon Springs Fire Protection 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas South Pasadena Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Safety Harbor Fire Protection 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Kenneth City Lealman Fire & Fire Protection 5/9/96 9/30/96 (+ Lealman Fire and Rescue to provide fire protection Rescue, lnc. Services Agreement automatically services to Kenneth City. renewed for 3 yrs., ending 9/30/02 ) Public Safety (Fire) Kenneth City Lealman Fire & Fire Protection 10/1/03 9/30/2005 Lealman Fire and Rescue to provide fire protection Rescue, Inc. Services Agreement services to Kenneth City. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas East Lake Fire & Fire Protection 10/14/99 90 days notice To define the obligations and responsibilities of the Rescue, Inc. Services Agreement parties with respect to the provision of fire protection services in the unincorporated East Lake areas of the County. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas East Lake Fire & Fire Protection 4/30/97 30 days notice Provision of fire protection service by East take Rescue, Inc. Services Agreement Fire and Rescue to Brooker Creek Preserve. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Dunedin Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. 9/ 15/20U3 ~! DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party. l . .• Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes .. ~~ , ~ °: .. ~ ~ ~ ,. ,_ :~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Agreement of Agreement `, s. .. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Clearwater Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Belleau Bluffs Fire Protection 10/1/99 9/30/2009 Establish permanent plan of fire protection, Services Agreement determine minimum service levels, establish uniform standards for fire hydrants, implement Countywide assistance. Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas 5 Fire Service [LA 10/16/90 90 days notice Automatic Aid agreement (closest units respond). Districts Public Safety (Fire) Pinellas Fire Districts Resolution N/A Creates various districts (District resolutions on file). Public Safety Palm Harbor Special Fire Pinellas County Contract 10/1/97 9/30/2007 Contract for providing Advanced Life Support first (EMS) Control and Rescue responder services District Public Safety (Fire) Palm Harbor Special Fire All Cities and ILA 10/16/90 Continual unless Automatic Aid -Closest Unit Response Agreement Control and Rescue Pinellas County 90 days notice District Public Safety (Fire) Palm Harbor Special Fire Dunedin ILA 10/1/86 Until otherwise ILA for properties that Dunedin Annexes within a Control and Rescue modified defined area for the provisions of fire protection District services Public Safety (Fire) Palm Harbor Special Fire Pinellas County LOU 6/1/00 None MOU for the installation and maintainence of Control and Rescue Traffic Opticom preemption equipment District Public Safety Pinellas County City of Madeira ILA 5/2/89 upon 90 days Automatic Aid -Closest Unit Response Agreement Beach written voice Public Safety Florida Dept. of City of Madeira 2/6/01 upon 60 day Catastrophic Disaster Response and Recovery Community Affairs - Beach notice by the Ci[y Division of Emergency to withdraw Mgmt 9/15/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreemen Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement ~ Public Safety Pinellas County City of Madeira Agreement 10/1/97 09/30/2007 or ALS (Advanced Life Support) First Responder Beach may be terminated by the Pinellas County Emergency Medical Service for cause upon 20 day notice to City Manager or may be terminated by the City upon 6 month notice Public Safety Pinellas County City of Madeira Agreement 6/25/05 upon 45 day Building Dept Services Agreement: Flood Beach written notice Protection, Permitting and Inspections Public Safety (Fire) Palm Harbor Special Fire Pinellas County LOU 12/13/00 Not Provided Agreement to provide personnel for hazardous Control and Rescue Emeregency materials response District Management Public Safety Palm Harbor Special Fire Pinellas County [LA 6/21/01 None Student Ride along as part of medical program at (GMS) Control and Rescue School Board Palm Harbor University High School District v/ I ~/2U(I i DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreemen Effective Date of Expiration Date DescriPtion/Notes ' Agreement . of Agreement Public Safety Seminole Madeira Beach ILA 10/19/99 09/30/2009 Joint Interlocal to provide Fire Suppression and renewable for other Emergency and Non-emergency services to additional 10 North Redington Beach, Redington Beach, and years, termination Redington Shores upon mutual consent with 90 day notice, agreement will remain in effect for a period of 6 month after mutually agreed termination date Public Safety Seminole Madeira Beach ILA 1/5/00 01/04/10 Joint Interlocal to provide Fire Suppression and renewable for EMS services to North Redington Beach, additional 10 Redington Beach, and Redington Shores years, termination upon mutual consent wit 90 day notice, agreement will remain in effect for a period of 6 month after mutually agreed termination date Public Safety (Law Sheriff Belleau Bluffs ILA 8/8/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Indian Rocks Beach ILA 12/2/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) 9/ I $/20(11 DRAFT' Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement Public Safety (Law Sheriff Madeira Beach ILA 11/1/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff North Redington ILA 9/12/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Beach Public Safety (Law Sheriff Oldsmar ILA 11/1/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Redington Beach ILA 8/20/02 5- one year terms Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Safety Harbor ILA 12/3/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Seminole ILA 8/27102 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Dunedin ILA 1/20/95 4 years w/ Enforcement) renewal option Public Safety (Law Sheriff Dunedin ILA 9/13/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewal of 1995 agreement). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff South Pasadena [LA I l/1/02 9/30/2003 Effective 10/1/2002 (renewed annually). Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Sheriff Kenneth City Contract 10/2/02 Support services (evidence and property control). Enforcement) Public Safety (law Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 1/1/00 12/31/2004 Mutual aid agreement for law enforcement agency. Enforcement) Public Safety (Law Pinellas County Kenneth City [LA Enforce Geographic Information System -sharing Enforcement) information. Public Safety (Law St. Petersburg Kenneth City Contract Provide services for Legal Service Forfeiture Act. Enforcement) ~)/ 15211(13 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2: Type o[ Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement o[ Agreement Public Safety (taw State of Florida Kenneth City ILA 1/2/03 Dept. of Children and Families Investigation Enforcement) Assistance. Public Safety (Law Pinellas County Kenneth City ILA 10/15/02 Dept. of Justice Coordination -Baker Act Enforcement) Transport Act for Minors. Solid Waste Pinellas Cities Court Judgment N/A N/A By law, the County has the right and duty to dispose of solid waste. There is no need for interlocal agreements. As for solid waste service, cities can implement their own collection and delivery to the County's disposal facilities. Solid Waste Pinellas Cities ILA 6/25/99 9/30/2004 Agreement regarding recycling grants. Parties (Recycling) agree to continue to work together to reach the goals of the Pinellas County Recycling Committee. The agreement details how gran[ money, if any, will be distributed and for what uses. Stormwater Southwest Florida Water Madeira Beach Grant 10/31/01 6/30/2003 Grant for Stormwater System C-2 thru C-5 along Management District 140th Ave Stormwater Treasure Island Madeira Beach summer 2003 summer 2004 Street Sweeping Drainage Pinellas All Cities 6/16/2005 Pinellas, all cities, FDOT, and Pinellas Park Water Management District providing for joint control of pollutants from public or private lands within respective jurisdictions Potable Water Pinellas Oldsmar ILA 12/28/99 5/14/2005 0.5-1.0 mgd wholesale agreement. This water (Water Supply) would be used by Oldsmar to service area outlined in exhibit A. Potable Water Pinellas Dunedin ILA 10/6/92 5 years 1 mgd max wholesale agreement to service area in (Water Supply) exhibit A. The minimum is 1 mg/month. Potable Water Pinellas Safety Harbor [LA 9/9/97 5 years 1.2-2.2 mgd wholesale agreement. (Water Supply) Potable Water Pinellas Tarpon Springs [LA 12/]/92 5 years 1.65-4.0 mgd wholesale agreement. (Water Supply) Potable Water Pinellas Pinellas Park ILA 1/28/88 20 years 3.7-7.5 mgd wholesale agreement. (Water Supply) 9/ 15/2003 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement Potable Water Pinellas Largo ILA 1/25/72 N/A Agreement allowing Pinellas to operate Largo's (Water Supply) water system. Potable Water Pinellas Clearwater ILA 3/19/76 30 years Expires 9/30/05. This is a 10 mgd wholesale (Water Supply) agreement. Potable Water Pinellas Kenneth City Resolution N/A N/A Resolution approving the purchase of water for the (Water Supply) Town from Pinellas County. Potable Water Pinellas Largo ILA 10/1/75 N/A This agreement transfers the right to operate (Water Supply) Largo's existing water system to Pinellas County. 'fhe County will pay Largo for outstanding debt and debt serviced. Potable Water Pinellas Belleau ILA 5/7/96 S years This is an agreement for up to 1 mgd of (Water Supply) "emergency service (wholesale)." The new agreement is an emergency exchange service. Potable Water St. Petersburg Oldsmar ILA 5/18/79 2 years notice Wholesale agreement. Oldsmar will buy water (Water Supply) from St. Petersburg. There is a reference to Gulfport buying St. Pete water. Potable Water Pinellas County, Pasco Pinellas County, ILA 10/1/98 Unanimous Establishes Tampa Bay Water (formerly known as (Water Supply) County, Hillsborough Pasco County, consent or upon the West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority) County, St. Petersburg, Hillsborough County, direction of 2 who is the sole wholesale water supplier to member Tampa, and New Port St. Petersburg, member governments. There are limited exceptions to Richey Tampa, and New Port governments if a exclusivity for members to keep some facilities. Richey material provision of the ILA is substantially modified by the FL Legislature. Potable Water St. Petersburg Gulfport ILA 10/6/88 30 yr. Tetm ( St. Petersburg will sell potable water to Gulfport. (Water Supply) + automatic renewal each yr.) Potable Water St. Petersburg South Pasadena Resolution 1/11/96 1/I 1/2001 St. Petersburg to furnish potable water to South (Water Supply) Pasadena for a period of 5 years. Potable Water Pinellas County Madeira Beach 6/23/97 upon 60 day Water System Billing to include collection for City (Water Supply) written notice Services of sanitary system, refuse collection, and stormwater fee on the same bill as that of the County water services 9/I S/_)(1114 ~~ DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service. Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreemen Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement ": of Agreement . Parks and School Board Madeira Beach Use of Madeira 6/10/01 6/9/2006 Use of Madeira Middle and Elementary Schools Recreation Middle and Elementary Schools Parks and School Board Madeira Beach Park Lease 4/25/01 4/24/2006 Bi-Centennial Park Lease Recreation Parks and Pinellas Madeira Beach ILA 1/25/83 30 days notice City to operate and maintain facility. Profits from Recreation operation of the parking meters will be split 50/50. Parks and Pinellas St. Pete Beach ILA 5/19/87 90 days notice City to install and maintain parking meters at Recreation beach access. The County will install and maintain parking spaces. City and county will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and Pinellas Indian Shores ILA 2/14/95 90 days notice City to install and maintain parking meters at Recreation beach access. The county will install and maintain parking spaces. City and county will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 1 1/20/73 N/A The agreement outlines sale and acquisition of Recreation parcels to develop Sand Key Park. The agreement outlines duties and obligations of both Clearwater and the County. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater [LA 1/28/86 90 days notice City to provide lifeguards and first-aid for the Recreation County Park on Sand Key. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 7/25/84 90 days notice City to install and maintain parking meters at Sand Recreation Key Park. The County will install and maintain parking spaces. City and county will share proceeds (60/40) after cost of meters and installation recovered. Parks and Pinellas Clearwater ILA 9/28/82 N/A Development and management of Sand Key Park. Recreation Parks and Pinellas St. Petersburg [LA 8/11/87 20 years City to provide the County with sewer service for Recreation Ft. De Soto Park. Parks and Pinellas Hillsborough ILA I (/23/99 30 days notice Outlines operation and maintenance requirements Recreation of each county for the Friendship Trail Bridge ')/I 5/2(1(13 DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service Party 1 Party 2 Type of Agreement Effective Date of Expiration Date Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement Parks and Pinellas/Hillsborough FDOT ILA 10/15/97 N/A Transfer ownership of the Old Gandy Bridge to the Recreation two counties for the Friendship "frail Bridge. (+ 1 license agreement dated 12/1/99.) Parks and Pinellas SWFWMD/ School ILA 8/4/76 County Default or Construction and management of water Recreation Board 60 Days Notice management project and nature study/ recreational by District facility. The agreement has three amendments. (+ 3 amendments dated 7/18/78, 9/9/80, and 6/20/88.) Parks and Pinellas Dunedin [LA 3/18/03 Pinellas County helped purchased St. Andrew's Recreation Links Golf Course along with the City of Dunedin. County citizens who reside within the unincorporated areas of Pinellas County are entitled to use certain recreation facilities as specified for the same tees as if they were residents of Dunedin. Transportation Pinellas Pinellas MPO MOU 9/8/77 60 days notice Pinellas agrees to provide the MPO with support Facilities services. Transportation Pinellas MPO School Board MOA 10/22/78 Can only be Ensures participation in transportation planning. Facilities terminated by the School Board. Transportation Pinellas MPO Hillsborough ILA 6/21/05 30 days notice Only amendment in file 3/25/00 (H[V Facilities transportation service 3/1/99). Transportation Pinellas Suncoast Transit Madeira Beach Contract 6/8/76 no termination Facilities Authority date established Transportation Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 10/1/00 9/30/2005 Traffic Control Signals Maintenance Agreement Facilities Transportation North Redington Beach Madeira Beach 10/2/95 indefinite, but Reimburse Madeira Beach the actual cost of fuel Facilities may be per invoice plus a $0.10 per gallon administrative terminated by fee. Madeira Beach reimburses North Redington either party with Beach its pro rata share of any fuel tax refunds or 30 days written rebates received notice Transportation Pinellas County Madeira Beach 1/1/92 8/31/2007 6th Cent Local Option Gas 'fax Facilities Planning Pinellas St. Petersburg ILA Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Pinellas Park ILA 5/2/72 N/A lstablishes Planning Area. '1/ 15/2111,1 S DRAFT Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Inventory Service :-Party 1 ', _ . , Party 2 Type of Agreemeq Effective Date of Ezpiratiori Date. Description/Notes Agreement of Agreement. ~ r ~d Planning Pinellas Clearwater ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (1/14/92 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Dunedin ILA 7/6/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (2/21/95 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Oldsmar 1LA 8/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (9/13/99 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Safety Narbor ILA 7/25/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (3/24/92 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Pinellas Park [LA 10/23/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Largo ILA 10/23/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area. Planning Pinellas Tarpon Springs ILA 9/27/00 9/30/2010 Establishes Planning Area (10/10/89 original a reement . Planning Pinellas Planning Council Madeira Beach 10/1/01 09/31/04 Planning Services Planning / Pinellas County Madeira Beach 2/1/02 American Assembly Cooperation Planning / Pinellas County Madeira Beach Agreement 5/4/93 automatic renewal Cooperation Agreement Community Development Cooperation in successive 3 Block Grant year periods unless County or City provides written notice 9/ 15/2003 Pinellas County EMS ILAs Addendum (Draft) Serviee Party 1 Party 2 Agreement Effective Date Expiration Date DescriptionJNotes EMS Pinellas State of FL, Div of Agreement 5/12/92 Automatic Administrative Hearings Renewal for 1 year terms until canceled EMS Pinellas Financial Credit Services Agreement 6/21/94 11/29/2005 Collection Services EMS Bayfront Medical Center Pinellas and LifeFleet Agreement 1/29/01 9/30/2004 High Risk Perinatal Transport EMS Belleau Fire Dept Largo Fire Dept MOU 2/2/96 Dces not expire Fire Department First Responder Agencies EMS Belleau Bluffs Fire Dept Largo Fire Dept MOU 2/2/96 Dces not expire Fire Department First Responder Agencies EMS Pinellas All Hospitals Contract 3/1/88 4/30/1998 On-Line Medical Control for all First Responders and ambulance activities. System remains in place and is functioning. New agreement will be executed to provide funding of a new system in the future. EMS Pinellas Belleau Agreement 3/13/97 9/30/2007 Agreement establishes BLS First Responder duties EMS Pinellas Belleau Bluffs Agreement 1/10/97 9/30/2007 Agreement establishes BLS First Responder duties EMS Pinellas Eckerd College, Inc Agreement 3/10/99 9/30/2008 Agreement establishes BLS First Responder and search and rescue responsibilities EMS Pinellas 18 entities (Belleau, Agreement St. Petersburg - 9/30/2007 EMS First Responder Agreements Clearwater, Dunedin, East 10/1/98 Lake Tarpon, Gulfport, All Others - Pinellas Suncoast, Largo, 10/1/97 Lealman, Madeira Beach, Oldsmar, Palm Harbor, Pinellas Park, Safety Harbor, St. Pete Beach, St. Petersburg, Seminole South Pasadena, Tarpon Springs and Treasure Island EMS Pinellas Geac Public Safety, Inc Agreement 7/16/97 Ambulance billing software maintenance and support EMS Pinellas Hospice of the Florida Contract 9/1/96 Automatic Ambulance services Suncoast Renewal each January 1, unless teRninated EMS Pinellas LifeFleet Agreement 10/1/99 9/30/2004 (can To provide exclusive ambulance transport service for emergency be renewed for and non-emergency patients two consecutive 3 year terms Pinellas County EMS ILAs Addendum (Draft) .Service Party 1 Party 2 Agreement Effective Date. Expiration Date Description/Notes EMS Pinellas Emergency Medical Services Agreement 12/30/00 12/29/2003 Medical Direction Service. In the process of being extended for Group Inc one year. Contract states two one-year extensions may be exercised. EMS Pinellas Bank of America Agreement 10/1/Ol 9/30/2007 Credit card service agreement which allows ambulance bills to be charged to credit cards EMS Pinellas Pinpoint Technologies, Inc Contract 4/17/03 Automatic Annual maintenance and support for ambulance services patient Renewal each billing software fiscal year EMS Pinellas St. Petersburg College Agreement 10/1/03 9/30/2006 Agreement establishes on-going Continuing Medical education (CME) training for all 1,350 personnel in the EMS system EMS Pinellas St. Petersburg Clearwater MOU 3/14/97 Dces not expire Provides direction for BLS services at the airport Airport EMS Pinellas St. Pete Beach Agreement 10/1/97 9/30/2007 Establishes municipal ambulance subscription plan in the city for all residents EMS Pinellas Social Services A Bement 11/12/93 Dces not ex ire Com rehensive Care Pro am EMS Pinellas Superior Asset Inc. Agreement 6/21/94 11/29/2005 Collection services EMS Pinellas Danton Agreement 8/11/03 11/10/2003 Temporary printing services EMS Pinellas Axis Agreement 10/1/99 9/30/2004 GEAC printing EMS Pinellas David Werfel Agreement 1/1/02 12/31/2005 Compliance audit newsletter EMS Pinellas SMART Agreement 6/23/03 6/22/2008 Duplication for atty. Requests EMS Pinellas All Municipalities and Fire Ageement 10/16/90 In effect while PC Automatic Aid Service Districts BCC provides emergency communication services to fire service providers Pinellas County Fire ILAs Addendum (Draft) Service Party 1 Party 2 Agreement Effective Date Ezpiration Date Description/IVotes Fire Pinellas All fire agencies in County ILA 10/16/90 None Establishes automatic aid and closest unit response program between the County and all fire service agencies in the County Fire Pinellas East Lake Fire & Rescue, Inc ILA 10/1/97 Automatic Fire Protection Services for the Brooker Creek Preserve area and annually renewed provides firefighting foam and equipment Fire Pinellas City of Oldsmar Fire Dept ILA 5/27/97 Automatic Fire Protection Services for the Brooker Creek Preserve area and annually renewed provides firefighting foam and equipment Fire Pinellas City of Dunedin Lease 5/17/01 5/16/2021 Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called anywhere in the County Fire Pinellas City of Pinellas Park Lease 9/11/01 9/10/2021 Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called anywhere in the County Fire Pinellas City of St. Petersburg Lease 10/15/02 10/14/2022 Lease of brush truck for use by the City and required to respond anytime called anywhere in the County Fire Pinellas Town of Belleau Bluffs [LA 9/16/99 9/15/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Belleau Bluffs Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Clearwater ILA 11/4/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Clearwater Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Dunedin ILA 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Dunedin Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of St. Petersburg ILA 10/2/00 10/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Gandy Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Largo ILA 10/14/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Highpoint Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Largo ILA 10/14/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Largo Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Pinellas Park ILA 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Highpoint Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Pinellas Park ILA 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Pinellas Park Fire Protection District Pinellas County Fire ILAs Addendum (Draft) Service Party 1 Party 2 ,Agreement Effective Date Expiration Date Description/Notes Fire Pinellas City of Safety Harbor (LA 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Safety Harbor Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Seminole ILA 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Seminole Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of South Pasadena ILA 10/14/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated South Pasadena Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Tarpon Springs [LA 9/16/99 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Tarpon Springs Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of St. Petersburg ILA 10/2/00 9/30/2009 Fire Protection Services Agreement for the city to provide fire services in the unincorporated Tierra Verde Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas State of FL Dept of Grant 1/28/98 1/28/1999 Hazard Mitigation Grant used to install hurricane shutters and Community Affairs window film on Sunstar building Fire Pinellas City of Pinellas Park ILA 7/31/03 9/30/2003 Agreement for the city to provide fire inspection and plan review services in the Gandy Fire Protection District. Fire Pinellas City of S. Pasadena [LA 12/19/02 9/30/2003 Agreement for the city to provide fire inspection and plan review services in the Tierra Verde Fire Protection District. Fire Pinellas Lealman Special Fire Control ILA 7/15/02 ] 2/31/2003 Agreement to build a fire station in Lealman Park and for County District provide up to $2.2 million for the project Fire Pinellas Lealman Special Fire Control Resolution 9/18/01 Resolution authorizing the Quit Claim deed for Lealman property District to be transferred to new special fire control district along with Assignment of Closest Unit Response Agreement, Bill of Sale of all assets and amendment to Fire Protection Services Agreement Fire Pinellas City of Largo Lease Lease of fire station property on Whitney Road to City of Largo for Fire Protection Services in the Highpoint Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas City of Pinellas Park Lease 11/8/90 9/30/1991 Lease of fire station property on Evergreen Avenue to City of Pinellas Park for Fire Protection Services in the Highpoint Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas St. Petersburg College ILA Proposed 5 years plus 15 Lease of property and operations agreement for the County's one-year terms centralized Fire and Public Safety training facility possible 20 more years Pinellas County Fire ILAs Addendum (Draft) Service Party 1 Party 2 Agreement Effeetive Date Ezpiration Date Description/Notes Fire Pinellas All fire agencies in Pinellas ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with and Pasco County neighboring counties and major cities Fire Pinellas All fire agencies in Pinellas ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with and Hillsborough County neighboring counties and major cities Fire Pinellas All fire agencies in Pinellas ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with and City of Tampa neighboring counties and major cities Fire Pinellas All fire agencies in Pinellas ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with and Manatee County neighboring counties and major cities Fire Pinellas All fire agencies in Pinellas ILA Proposed N/A Fire and Emergency Services Mutual Aid Agreement with and City of Bradenton neighboring counties and major cities Fire Pinellas City of St. Petersburg ILA l0/1/00 9/30/2003 City agrees to provide Fire Protection Services for Fort Desoto Park Fire Pinellas City of St. Petersburg Lease Proposed N/A Lease of new Tierra Verde fire station and property for the city to use to provide Fire Protection Services for the unincorporated Tierra Verde area Fire Pinellas Cities of largo and Pinellas Resolution 12/20/83 N/A Expansion of Largo and Pinellas Park Fire Service areas into the Park Highpoint Fire Protection District Fire Pinellas Cities of Largo and Pinellas Resolution 12/20/83 Merger of Highpoint Fire Department with the cities fire Park departments and distributing all assets of the Highpoint Department Interlocal Service Delivery Agreements Report Page 2 of 2 5. The state land planning agency shall establish a schedule for phased completion and transmittal of plan amendments to implement subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. from all jurisdictions so as to accomplish their adoption by December 31, 1999. A local government may complete and transmit its plan amendments to carry out these provisions prior to the scheduled date established by the state land planning agency. The plan amendments are exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). 6. By January 1, 2004, any county having a population greater than 100,000, and the municipalities and special districts within that county, shall submit a report to the Department of Community Affairs which: • a. Identifies all existing or proposed interlocal service-delivery agreements regarding the following: education; sanitary sewer; public safety; solid waste; drainage; potable water; parks and recreation; and transportation facilities. . b. Identifies any deficits or duplication in the provision of services within its jurisdiction, whether capital or operational. Upon request, the Department of Community Affairs shall provide technical assistance to the local governments in identifying deficits or duplication. • 7. Within 6 months after submission of the report, the Department of Community Affairs shall, through the appropriate regional planning council, coordinate a meeting of all local governments within the regional planning area to discuss the reports and potential strategies to remedy any identified deficiencies or duplications. • 8. Each local government shall update its intergovernmental coordination element based upon the findings in the report submitted pursuant to subparagraph 6. The report may be used as supporting data and analysis for the intergovernmental coordination element. http: ~~,~-~~.dca.state.fl.us fdcp DCP ser~~icedeli~~erv 163,1 ~76h1.htm 9 ~ inn; COMMISSIONERS: KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL- CHAIRMAN SUSAN LATVALA • VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS JOHN MORRONI ROBERT B. STEWART BARBARA SHEEN TODD KENNETH T. WELCH - August 29, 2003 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS i D PfNELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ^~\~~ 315 COURT STREET ~~{ . ••• CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 SEp. U ~ 2003 plANN1~F ~ ~~~A-~ER c~N ~ - To: Interlocal Service Delivery Agreement Work Group Member From: .Gordon Beardslee, General Planning Administrator Pinellas County Planning Department - ' Subject: September 15 Meetirig to Review Draft Inventory of Service Delivery Agreements and to Begin Discussing Next Steps in the Project As you know; the County, the municipalities-and special districts, are required, under changes to Chapter 163, F.S.; to undertake a coordinated countywide effort to identify cleficiencies or duplication in the provision, or delivery, of services. First though; we are required to collectively inventory all existing and proposed interlocal service delivery-related agreements that relate to the following subject areas: Education, Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Public Safety, Parks and Recreation and Transportation: ~ , To help complete the Interlocal Service Delivery requirements, we have scheduled a coordination meeting for the following date and location: ~ f September 15 (Monday) at 10:00 a.m. Pinellas County Utilities Building ~ . 4th Floor Learning Center (Conference Room A) 14 S. Fort Harrison Avenue (Downtown Clearwater) The purpose of the meeting will be to go over the draft inventory of agreements, and to begin to discuss the next step of the project -identification of gaps in service delivery and/or duplication/overlaps in service delivery. . If you have edits/updates/additions to the inventory of agreements please try to send them in advance, email them, or bring them with you. If you have any questions before the meeting,. please call me or Liz Freeman of my staff at 464-8200'. We look forward to seeing you on September 15! , Don't forget to check out the-website at.: www.pinellascounty,or~/Plan/interlocal !! , F:\USERS\CENDOCS\SERVICE DELIVERYPROJECT Aug 03\Service Delieery mtg reminder082903.GBgg.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 315 Court Street LOCATION: 600 Cleveland Street,. Suite 750; Clearwater, Florida 33755 ~ Clearwater, FL 33756, TELEPHONE: (727) 464-8200 FAX:. (727) 464-8201 "Pinellas~County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" •Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace L,f printed on recycled paper `