Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
DRI AMENDMENT
4,,,ksession Item #: s a #earwater City Commission E Final Agenda Item # 9q ?? ends Cover Memorandum TEA? Meeting Date: Jan. 18, 2001 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE the Notice of Proposed Change for Park Place Development of Regional Impact for property located between Gulf to Bay Boulevard north to Drew Street and extending from the U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road to Hampton Road (A portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East more particularly, described in the attached ordinance); Owner: Park Place Land, Ltd. MOTION: APPROVE the Notice of Proposed Change for Park Place Development of Regional Impact for property located between Gulf to Bay Boulevard north to Drew Street and extending from the U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road to Hampton Road (A portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East more -" particularly described in the attached ordinance) and PASS Ordinance 6678-01 on first reading. ?l ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. t SUMMARY. The Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) was originally approved by the City on September 1, 1983. The DRI encompasses approximately 99 acres and a variety of land uses including office, restaurants, light industrial, commercial and multi-family dwellings. Several amendments have been approved to this DRI to reflect changing land uses, phasing, extension of the build-out date and adding a conversion factor among different uses. The proposed amendment requests three changes to the current development order for the site: 1. Reduce the approved amount in the entire project for retail and office space (retail/ commercial land use reduced by 68,880 square feet; office land use reduced by 234,041 square feet). 2. Approve a land use donversion factor on Parcel 6 only to allow conversion from the approved office use to either multifamily and/or hotel. 3. Extend the buildout date for the project by three years to December 31, 2003. The Park Place DRI is completely built out with the exception of Parcel 6 located in the southeast portion of the DRI. This amendment would allow development alternatives for this parcel as well as provide for three years to complete the construction. Currently, the approved development potential for Parcel 6 is 100,000 square feet of office. With the approval of the land use conversion factor, Parcel 6 may be developed with any combination of office, multi-family and/or hotel within the maximum potential using the conversion factor. Reviewed by: Originating Dep,,{ Costs Legal Info Srvc N/A Planning Total N/A Budget N/A Public Works N/A User Dept.: Funding Source: Purchasing N/A DCM/ACM Planning Current FY Cl C. Hardin disk Mgmt N/A Other Attachments: OP ` Staff Report Other Ordinance Submitted by: City Manager ? None Appropriation Code: ?? Printed on recycled oaner s STATE OF FLORIDA RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl, 32399-2100 -(850) 488-8466 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning council, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR., the undersigned authorized representative of PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, the Applicant submits the following information concerning the PARK PLACE DRI development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City"), to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), and to the Bureau of Resource Management, Department of Community Affairs ("DCA" . ( ate) Timoth A. Jo nson, Jr. Authorized Representative for Park Place Land, Ltd. 2. Applicant: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Phone (305) 860-8188 Fax: (305) 860-8196 3. Authorized Agent: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 4. Location of approved DRI and proposed change: A portion of Section ' 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"). 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. The Applicant is filing this Notice of Proposed Change Application to (i) reduce approved office and retail space; (ii) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Parcel 6") for multi-family and/or hotel uses; and (iii) extend the buildout date by three (3) years to December 31, 2003. The following paragraphs describe the proposed changes in more detail. -2- i Reduction of Office and Retail Space. A revised Park Place DRI Master Development Plan, Map H, dated September 18, 2000, is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" ("Revised Map H"). As shown on Revised Map H, the land use schedule has been revised to reduce approved office and retail space. The following table provides a comparison of the currently approved land uses and the proposed uses: LAND USE COMPARISON LAND USES APPROVED USES.' PROPOSED USES NET INCREASEIDECREASE, Retail/Commercial 150,000 sq. ft. 81,120 sq. ft. (68,880 sq. ft.) Office 635,680 sq. ft.' 404,639 sq. ft. (234,041.00 sq. ft.) Lt. Industrial 200,000 sq. ft. 200,000 sq. ft. -0- Multi-family Residential 390 dwelling units 390 dwelling units -0- Approved office of 795,520 sq. ft. was reduced by 159,840 sq. ft., which was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units, pursuant to conversion factor set forth in Ordinance No. 5722-95. Conversion Factor. The Applicant is requesting approval of a trade-off mechanism to allow the Developer to convert office development allocated to Parcel 6 to multi-family, and/or hotel development. The Applicant proposes conversion factors for Parcel 6 which are designed to balance P.M. peak hour external vehicle trips, based on the results of the Park Place 2000 NOPC Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Florida Design Consultants attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C" (the 'Traffic Analysis"). The proposed conversion factors are (i) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.4 multi-family units and (ii) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.44 hotel rooms. The conversion factors are shown in detail on Page 6 of the Traffic Analysis. The converted uses, if any, will be restricted to Parcel 6, which has a land use designation of Residential/Office/Retail allowing office, residential and hotel uses. Notwithstanding the proposed conversion factors, the existing land use plan designation limits (i) the maximum multi-family density on Parcel 6 to 18 units per gross acre, a maximum of 111 units (6.16 acres X 18 units per acre) and (ii) the maximum hotel density on Parcel 6 to 30 rooms per gross acre, a maximum of 185 -3- 0 0 rooms. The Applicant proposes to set forth these development limitations in the amended Development Order. The development of hotel and/or office will not exceed density or floor area ratios established by the City's Land Development Code. As evidenced in the Traffic Analysis: (i) Any conversion of Parcel 6 development, as proposed, will increase the internal capture and decrease the directional traffic impact as compared to office development of Parcel 6; and (ii) The proposed uses, when fully built, represent a 34.1 percent reduction in PM peak hour external trips when compared to the approved development plan. Extension of Buildout Date. The Applicant requests a three-year extension of buildout of the DRI from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2003. As evidenced by the Traffic Analysis, the proposed extension does not necessitate additional roadway improvements beyond those set forth in the approved Development Order. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The revised conceptual plan for Park Place is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." 6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, please indicate no change. The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart is Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e. any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Chart). The DRI Development Order was originally adopted by the City of Clearwater, Florida, as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983, amended by -4- 0 0 Ordinance No. 3287-83, adopted October 20, 1983, and readopted December 8, 1983, amended by Ordinance No. 5142-91, adopted December 19, 1991, amended by Ordinance No. 5722-95, adopted January 19, 1995, and amended by Ordinance No. 6107-96, adopted November 21, 1996. Ordinance No. 5142-91 amended the Development Order by (i) adding 200,000 square feet of industrial use and providing a maximum F.A.R. for the same; (ii) changing the phasing of the development from three phases to one phase with three subphases and revising conditions based on phasing; (iii) changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements; (iv) eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and (v) extending the build-out date by five (5) years. Ordinance _No... _5.722-95 -amended ;the Development Order by (i) modifying the phasing of the Development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; (ii) decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extending the build-out date by four (4) years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; (v) adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; (vi) deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; (vii) restating all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. Ordinance No-6107-96 amended the ..Development Order by (i) providing a land use conversion facto-r-fog- Parcel 4 allowing conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflecting certain changes in ownership. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? No. If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Not applicable. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development -5- 0 6 order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use, and adjacent non- project land uses within '/2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. No additional lands have been purchased or optioned. 9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. No. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. Yes No X 10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. Yes. The proposed buildout date is December 31, 2003. 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. Parcel 6 is designated on the City of Clearwater Future Land Use Map as Residential/Office/Retail, a land use designation allowing retail/commercial, multi- family, hotel and office development. Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended development order, pursuant to Subsections 380.06(15), F.S., and 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code: 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(10)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order conditions and -6- 0 0 requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, is applicable; d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. A proposed ordinance adopting the proposed change and setting forth the precise language proposed to be changed is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "D." Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H Exhibit "C" - Traffic Analysis Exhibit "D" - Ordinance Exhibit "E" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart 10/11/00 11:56 AM d-1 37413.95209 #103409 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE NOPC -7- 0 0 rn Q: w ? O a L O DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) EXISTING ACCESS _ OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82.179 SF UNDER CONSTRUCnoN? MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) NATURAL AREA PARCEL 2 0 I- OFFICE m°Jv MULTI-FAMILY 0 101,90SF PARCEL 4 156 D.U. (101.900 SF EXISTING) .G? P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Qv COMMERICAL 2P PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (RETAIL) 55,278 SF (120,560 SF GMCE EXISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) PARCEL 7 QFF_I-OE (55.276 SF EXIST ON 220, 5601 SF PARCELS 7 AND 9) 1 PARCEL 9 COMMER PARCELCIAL1J? COMMERCIAL 0 PARCEL 11 (11,303 SF EXISTING)". (14,539 SF EXISTING) GU COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 Sr EXISTING) ACCESS FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL'/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU , 390 DU NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF OEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS ME PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL I AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 05722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE UMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND 6. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 744 UNITS ART HFRFRY FCTARI ICHFD - P4- R M P FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. „xe ,4ti ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS B PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN E%HIBIT'B'TO PARK PLACE DRI NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 0 % EXHIBIT "A" r LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence,. leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 004'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. Clinton Commerical Group, Inc. DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION INVOICE-AMOUNT 10-09-00 100600 IIA- DRI 500.00 CHEC K 10-09-00 ECK 2229 TOTAL> 500 00 DATE NUM BER , PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS Receipt No: 1199823245 Date: 10/12/2000 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due -MISC Misc Fees - 50,000.00 @ $0.01 010-341405 Payments: $500.00 Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Amount Paid Check CLINTON COMMERCIAL GROUP - 2229 $500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $500.00 • ORDINANCE NO. -00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; REDUCING APPROVED OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DR[") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to EXHIBIT "D" the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRis; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, and 6107-96, is a valid final development order within the provisions of 2 0 0 Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 6 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Reducing approved office and retail space; 2. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and 3. Extending the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. 3 10 0 D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified -by the Proposed Changes- to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DR[ remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for 390 multi-family dwelling units and a total maximum floor area of 1 ,? T45,520 685,759 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795;529 404,639 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 4 450,089 81,120 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factors set forth in Subsection 4.A.A. The permitted I maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. C. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to either (i) 2.4 multi-family units or (ii) 2.44 hotel rooms are hereby established for the office area shown as Parcel 6 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: LAND USE TRADE-OFF RATES PARCEL 6 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT MAY BE CONVERTED TO,: 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.4 Multi-Family Units 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.44 Hotel Rooms Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel 6 shall be limited as follows: MINIMUM MAXIMUM Office 0* 100,000* Multi-Family 0** 111 ** Hotel 0** 185*** square feet of floor area ** units **' rooms D. The buildout date is hereby extended to December 31, 2003. E. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. F. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. 5 9 0 G. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. H. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H 10/11100 12:02 PM d-1 37413.95209 #103377 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE ORD Brian Aungst Mayor - Commissioner 6 • • EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. -00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01 " W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. EXHIBIT "B" ?J TO ORDINANCE NO. -00 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 "PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY ' PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN - PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space N/A N/A # Spectators N/A # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) N/A N/A N/A Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Hospitals # Beds N/A N/A N/A # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations I I 0 J PARK PLACE'bRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OFLAND.USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN - PREVIOUS Q.O. CNANGEAND DATE Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees NO change -0- 200,000 SF GFA (12/19/91 -Ord. #5142-91) Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage mined (year) N/A N/A Water Withdrawal (Gal/day) N/A Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces 404,639 SF GFA 1,103,000 SF GFA 803,000 SF GFA (12/19/91-Ord. #5142-91) ' # Employees 795,520 SF GFA (1/19/95-Ord. #5722-95) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations r, u • 159,840 square feet of Office was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units pursuant to conversion allowed by Ord. #5722-95. After conversion, Office = 635,680 SF GFA. -2- PARK,PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE-CATEGORY' PROPOSED PLAN' ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) N/A N/A Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) N/A Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A # boats, dry storage N/A Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site Iocational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Type of dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow office development on -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Multi-family Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site Iocational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations 9 -3- PARKPLACE-DR1 SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION-,CHART (contmuei? TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN. ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE.AND DATE',.: Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) 81,120 SF GFA 150,000 SF GFA None # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations Hotel/Motel # Rental Units Proposed amendment will allow office development on -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) additional parcel (Parcel 6) to factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial development to convert to hotel # Parking Spaces be converted to hotel . # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, N/A N/A N/A easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations ,rte u • -4- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATIONCHART`(coriGnue? TYPEAF.LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY, PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN' PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE'AND DATE Open Space (All natural and vegetated non- impervious surfaces )t21 Acreage Site locational changes Type of open space D.O. conditions ADA representations No change proposed Preservation, Buffer or Acreage Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 10/11/00 11:23 AM d-1 37413.95209 #223881 v1 - Park Place DRI/Sub Dev Cht 2000 No change proposed • -5- rl Agenda Cover Memorandum if 0 Summary Sheet Page 2 The Planning Department has determined that the proposed Notice of Proposed Change is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The proposed amendment is consistent with the Countywide Plan. • The proposed amendment is consistent with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's review and recommendations. • The proposed amendment is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has reviewed this application and determined that the requested amendments do not constitute a substantial deviation from the original approval. Therefore, no additional review nor new or revised conditions are required for this application. The Community Development Board reviewed this application at their December 12, 2000 public hearing and recommended approval. 0 0 ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; REDUCING APPROVED OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and Ordinance No. 6678-01 0 s WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant. to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order. as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, and 6107-96, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2 Ordinance No. 6678-01 B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 6 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Reducing approved office and retail space; 2. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and 3. Extending the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact,of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional 3 Ordinance No. 6678-01 0 0 impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DR[ remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized...to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for 390 multi-family dwelling units and a total maximum floor area of 1,'^ -r-,?,52-9 685.759 square feet, comprised of a maximum :795,62-B 404,639 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 450;898 81,120 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factors set forth in Subsection 4.A.A. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. 4 Ordinance No. 6678-01 0 0. C. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to either (i) 2.4 multi-family units or (ii) 2.44 hotel rooms are hereby established for the office area shown as Parcel 6 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: LAND USE TRADE-OFF RATES PARCEL 6 - EXISTING, DEVELOPMENT' ',- ".MAY BE CONVER7Ejp TO 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.4 Multi-Family Units 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.44 Hotel Rooms Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel6 shall be limited as follows: b MINIMUM MAXIMUM Office 0* 100,000- Multi-Family 0** ill** Hotel 0** 185*** I * square feet of floor area ** units *** rooms D. The buildout date is hereby extended to December 31, 2003. E. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. F. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. G. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. 5 Ordinance No. 6678-01 • • H. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: le-, 4 ?- W ? ?' - Leslie K. Dougal - ides Assistant City Attorney Brian Aungst Mayor - Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 6 Ordinance No. 6678-01 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01°04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left,that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°5449" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. 7 EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 8 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: December 12, 2000 CDB Item #: C-1 CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 REPRESENTATIVE: Tim Johnson, Esq., Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. LOCATION: Generally located between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Drew Street from Hampton Road to the U.S. 19 Frontage Road Legally described as a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. More particularly described in attached legal description. REQUEST: To amend the approved Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order through the Notification of Proposed Change process to: 1. Reduce approved office and retail space; 2. Provide a land use conversion factor for multifamily and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of the DRI; and 3. Extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31, 2003. SITE INFORMATION DRI SIZE: 99 acres DRI PROPERTY USES: Current Use: Retail, Office and Residential Proposed Use: Addition of multifamily and/or hotel use in Parcel 6 • PLAN CATEGORY: Current Categories: Proposed Category: ZONING DISTRICT: Current Districts: Proposed Districts: • Industrial Limited, Residential/Office/Retail, Residential/Office General, Commercial General and Preservation Same Industrial Research and Technology (IRT), Office (O), Commercial (C) and Preservation (P) Same EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Multifamily Residential, Retirement Residence, Nursing Home and Open Space South: Commercial East: Mobile Home Park, Single Family Residential West: Commercial DRI HISTORY: The DRI's development order was adopted by the Clearwater City Commission on September 1, 1983. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on October 20, 1983 to incorporate Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council recommendations. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on December 19, 1991 to provide 200,000 square feet for Industrial use and reduce Office use by 300,000 square feet; provide an F.A.R. for Industrial use; amending conditions based on phasing; amending the developer's payment schedule; and extending the buildout date by five years. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on January 19, 1995 to modify phasing; decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; extending the buildout date by four years; adding a conversion factor for Office use to Multifamily Residential and adding a conversion factor for Industrial use to Office or Multifamily Residential; and modifying conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on November 21, 1996 adding a land use conversion factor to Park Place DRI 2000 0 0 Parcel 4 for office and/or hotel development and reflecting a change in ownership. ANALYSIS Introduction This Development of Regional Impact {DRI) amendment is requested by the property owner to provide additional development options for Parcel 6 including residential and hotel units, and extend the buildout date of the entire DRI to December 31, 2003. The Park Place DRI is built out with the exception of this parcel and the developers have fulfilled the development order as amended. The amendment also proposes to reduce the approved DRI square footage to reflect existing and planned proposed uses. The current approved land use square footage is as follows: Retail/Commercial - 150,000; Office - 635,680; Light Industrial - 200,000; and Multifamily - 390 dwelling units. Parcel 6 is currently planned with 100,000 square feet of office. 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City's Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: 2.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. 2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. 3.2.2 Policy - Commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of "strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major intersections. 5.1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. Park Place DRI 2000 • • 5.5 Objective - All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. The proposed change will not require a Future Land Use Plan amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The Park Place DRI is a mixed use project with 985,680 square feet of approved uses and 390 dwelling units. This proposed amendment will decrease the overall approved uses of the DRI by 302,921 square feet (31 %) of the total potential development. The reduction of potential uses will decrease of the need for services such as potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste. However, the potential addition of residential units could impact the level of service of recreation facilities. These additional units may be subject to recreation/open space impact fees. The traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been reviewed by various agencies. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has agreed that the proposed amendments do not constitute a substantial deviation to the approved development order. Therefore, no additional review or additional mitigation will be required for this project. The proposed amendment will not decrease the transportation level of service. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The Future Land Use Map is not being amended, thus, there are not any applicable regulations from the Countywide Plan. III. CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) has determined that these proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes. A substantial deviation is defined by the Statutes as "any proposed change to a previously approved development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency." However, the TBRPC has determined that the applicant has rebutted the presumptions of a substantial deviation based on the analysis provided. Therefore, no further information or analysis will be required. The TBRPC finds the proposed amendment consistent with the Regional Plan. (See correspondence from the TBRPC.) Park Place DRI 2000 4 0 0 IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The State's Comprehensive Plan policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: (I 6)(b)3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of living, working, shopping, and recreational activities. (18)(b)1. Provide incentives for developing land in a way that maximizes the uses of existing public facilities. (25)(b)5. Ensure that the transportation system provides maximum access to jobs and markets. The proposed DRI amendment is consistent with all applicable State Comprehensive Plan policies. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis above, the Planning Department finds the application consistent with the Community Development Code and recommends approval of the Notice of Proposed Change. Submitted by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Directo Attachments: Applicant's Submittal to DCA DCA Letter FDOT Letter TBRPC Letter Applicant's Responses Location Map Park Place DRI Parcel Configuration SAPlanning Department\C D BTLEX\Pending Applications\Park Place DRI\Park Place DRI NOPC 2000.doc Park Place DRI 2000 ISLooation Map ParkPlace.DM NORTH ST a Q DRI SITE ? Qo d 40, RILLS OR ??rrlrrrrrrr? 3 `ysea? ?_i CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 11 ? V err ?? o PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ,y M F ? -?4TERrF?o', ENGINEERING I h? V7' _T Tampa Say,7Legional Planning Council Chairman Commissioner Chris Hart Vice-Chairman Frederick T. Reeves Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Mayor Pat Whitesel Manny L. Pumariega December 15, 2000 Ms. Cindy Hardin, Asst. Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 ??? ? PAC 1 8 20M ( 9 I Dgi"' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater, Notice of Proposed Change Report Dear Ms. Hardin: Per our telephone conversation, the staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed our review of the aforementioned NOPC in accordance with Section 380.06(19), F.S. In conclusion, the applicant has rebutted the presumption of a Substantial Deviation. Please note that this Report will appear on the agenda for the next Council meeting (January 19, 2001). If you should have any questions about the Report, please do not hesitate to contact me at extension 255. Thank you. Sincerely, eyer DRI Coordinator Attachment cc: Timothy Johnson Nick Shackleton, PPLL Robert Pergolizzi, FDC Marina Pennington, FDCA Kent Fast, FDOT Al Navaroli, Pinellas County George Deakin, Kimley-Horn 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513.5066 http://www. tbrpc. org Tampa Bay. Regional Ranning Council N019C Notice of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,103,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 150,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. Since the project has been previously consolidated into a single phase, this represents a cumulative buildout extension of 18 years. This inference to 1985 marks the initial Phase I buildout date. The currentl -a roved phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT ?,,OFFIGE INDUSTRIAL RETAIL - RESIDENTIAL ' 45 ILD.OUT, ' (Sq ;Ft.) (Sq. Ft:} r (Sq. Ft'.) ` °(Mult%"Family,' ''H Units) 2000 635,680 200,000 150,000 390 The developer request the following changes to the Development Order: reduction of office space by 231,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,880 sq. ft. (to 81,120 sq. ft.); allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and further extend the project buildout date by an additional three years (to December 31, 2003). The reduction in development parameters does not constitute a Substantial Deviation. The additional extension requested does constitute a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: "An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact. An extension of the date of buildout, or any phase thereof, of 5 years or more but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a r? • substantial deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. An extension of less than 5 years is not a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a buildout, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time." As identified above, the aforementioned modifications are presumed to constitute a Substantial Deviation to the Development Order. However, the applicant has rebutted this presumption upon the submittal of a sufficient transportation analysis. Therefore, no unmitigated regional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed modifications. Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that applicant has rebutted the presumption of a substantial deviation to the Development Order. ?'r I Tampa Say,R eglonal Planning Council Chairman Commissioner Chris Hart December 8, 2000 vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Frederick T. Reeves Mayor Pat Whitesel Manny L. Pumariega Ms. Cindy Hardin, Asst. City Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. iJiyrde Avenue/2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change Dear Ms. Hardin: This correspondence serves as notification that staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed our review of the additional information requested regarding the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) for the Park Place DRI. It is the staff's conclusion that no further information will be required by our agency and the developer has rebutted the presumption of a Substantial Deviation in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S. as it pertains to the further buildout extension. As a follow-up to this correspondence, Council staff will generate a NOPC Report that will be submitted to the City and review agencies on or before December 29, 2000. This Report will appear on the Consent Agenda at our January 19, 2001 Council meeting. If you should have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. cc: Mr. Tim Johnson Mr. Robert Pergolizzi VIE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER - 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petets Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 570-51 18 State Number 513-5066 http://www. tbrpc. org 2/08/2000 15:52 570-51 w ; +'iliif€{III ?II ?IIiiiUilifillN? I?III{1??? 111 ?!? IU ?ii??I!fl P' N? ! i?lit unll9ttl?l+m uuI18NIMP PM0111)jiJR drT!9 IR m amps $av7? f9lonal Planning Counell PLANNING is PAGE 01 ]FAX Developments of Regional Impact 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St- Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 7271570-5151 (ext. 255) / Suncom: 513-5066 / Fax: 727/570-5118 email: johnm@tbrpc.org TO: Cind Hardin, Asst. City Planning 'Direct FROM: John M. Meyer, DRI Coordinato SUBJECT: DRI 92 -Park Place Notice of oposed Change DATE: December 8, 2000 TIME: 3:00 pm # of Pages: 2 ? I! Cindy: Please see the attache correspondence as it pertains to the Park Place DRI. j.. If your should have any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks. I i? FAX: 562-4576 L2/08/2000 15:52 570-5118 (a PLANNING Tampa Bay?2egional T7anning Council Chairman icc-Chairmar) secretary/Treasurer Commissioner Chris Hart Fre ierick T. Reeves Mayor Pat whltesel December 8, 2000 Ms. Cindy Hardin, Asst. Ciily Planning Director City of Clearwater PlanninDepartment 1.00 S. Myrtle Avenue/2nd if loor Clearwater, FL 33756 I Subject: DRI?#92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change Dear Ms. Hardin: Executive DirCCtpr Manny L. Pumarlcga This correspondence serves k notification that staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed our review of the additional information requested regarding the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) for the Park Place DRI. It is the staff's conclusion that no further information will be required by our agency ad the developer has rebutted the presumption of a Substantial Deviation in accordance with Subject on 380.06(19)(c), F.S. as it pertains to the Ru-ther buildout extension. As a follow-up to this correspondence, Council staff will generate a. NOPC Report that will be submitted to the City and re ew agencies on or before December 29, 2000. This Report will appear on the Consent Agenda at Jur January 19, 2001 Council meeting. If you should have any quej?tions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, cc: Mr. Tim Johnson Mr. Robert Pergo 0 PAGE 02 9455 K ger Boulevard. Suite z 19, St, Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (7;J7)570-5151 FAX (727) 570-5 t t S state Number 513-5066 http://vA,,.w-tbrpc.org L FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS December 1, 2000 Mr. George Deakin, P.E. Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 1220 Tech Boulevard Tampa, FL 33619 Re: Park Place (DRI #92) Dear George: Per our discussion earlier today, enclosed is a CD-ROM containing the FSUTMS files. The specific distribution file is HRLDXY.P05 which was the'basis for the trip distribution approved at the August 9, 2000 methodology meeting. As we discussed, the only intersection that was not analyzed where DRI impact is close to 4.5% is SR 60Belcher Road. The parameters we discussed are as follows: Total DRI Traffic at the intersection 256 vph Total Intersection Capacity = 6394 vph PHF = -.95 Ratio of LOS D/LOS "E" .96 (per ART-TAB Table) The impact calculation '256/.95 = 269 - 4.39% 6394*..96 = 6138 As you know, unless the full project traffic impacts the intersection by 4.5% or more of the intersection, capacity the intersection does not require further .analysis: Furthermore, the developer is. not responsible. for improvements unless the project impact is 5% or greater. Additionally, the developer has already paid its proportionate share, which previously included improvements to the SR 60/Belcher Road intersection. (See Ordinance 5722-95, attached) . I hope this clarifies this remaining issue and I would appreciate your approval prior to December 8, 2000; so we may move forward with the City of Clearwater CDB hearing. Sincerely, Robert C. Pergolizzi, Vice President Transport at'on & Planning Ac LAdeakin.doc Encl. cc: Gary Jones, City of Clearwater. Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al Nicholas Schackleton, Park Place Land, Ltd. File 172-07 2639 MCCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8605, -4. Install or renovate, as appropriate, traffic,signals at the south project entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paid&ha-ll-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 35. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersection with Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidsha4-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements have been completed .] 46. Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U.S. 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement has been completedis 57. At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an--additional eastbound and westbound through lanes and additional exclusive left t-turn lanes on all approaches- and an additional right turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. The through lanes shall be continued to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidshaia--pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improvements. a + -0 _ 19/S R 60 i ;te ti ' t +b^"^d + t V - W- . seG GR, 6A^s a F E;ubseGtiGR ., 69. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane divided arterial from U.S. 19 to N.E. Coachman Road, and add turn lanes at all signalized intersections in between. A funding commitment has been made for Tthis improvement which is programmed for constructionge itted to in the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program foray-be;;g G9:letFUsted-gin fiscal year 1995/1996'92/'93. s FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS Mr. John Meyer, AICP DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Park Place DRI (DRI ##92) Response to Comments Dear Mr. Meyer: 0 November 30, We have reviewed the comments received in your November 9, 2000 letter; and provide the following responses: - Comment: 1. Intersection Analyses, Truck Factor. The applicant has used truck factor of two percent in the intersection analyses. The two percent is acceptable for the current NOPC, but in any future NOPC analysis it is requested that the actual truck factor, as determined from actual FDOT, Pinellas County or applicant counts, should be used. Response: 1. At the August 9, 2000 meeting the review agencies requested a 2%o truck factor be used. This was documented in my follow-up letter dated August 10, 2000. The advice regarding future NOPC analysis is noted. Hopefully this will be the last NOPC since the. DRI is nearly built-out. Please note the FDOT axle factors for SR 60 and US 19 are 0.98, so a 2% truck factor would appear appropriate. Comment: 2. DRI Proiect Traffic as a percent of Intersection Capacity. It appears that the applicant needs to update the calculation of the percentage of project traffic to the intersection capacity for the signalized intersections. The numerator should be the sum of the DRI project traffic in the HCS critical movements, divided by the Peak Hour Factor (PHF) for each` critical movement; and the denominator is the sum of the capacities of the critical movements multiplied by a factor of 0.885 to derive the capacity at level of service D. Examples of the methodology can be supplied upon request. Response: 2. The Transportation Methodology Report (page 4) paragraph V.C states: "The study area will also include signalized intersection where project traffic comprises 4.5% or more of intersection capacity". This was reiterated in the August 10, 2000 follow-up letter confirming this methodology was approved at the methodology meeting. The applicant has followed the approved methodology. 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 9 Fax: (727) 724-8606 Mr. John Meyer • November 30, 2000 Page 2 Comment: 3. Proiect Trip Distribution. What was the basis of the project trip distribution? If it was based on FSUTMS analysis, please state when the FSUTMS analysis was conducted and supply the review agency with a copy of the FSUTMS files; Typically a FSUTMS analysis would show a midblock dissipation of project trips on Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard west of U.S. 19, however, this is not the case for the project trip distribution shown in Figure 2, (unnumbered, three pages after page number. 4). Response: 3. Paragraph V.B of the Transportation Methodology Report stated the project traffic distribution would be based on the FSUTMS 2005 Regional Transportation Analysis model. Figure 1 of the Methodology Report (submitted July 2000) graphically showed this distribution which was reviewed and approved by all agencies at the August 9, 2000 meeting. The analysis followed this approved distribution which was shown in Figure 2 of the report. The mid-block dissipation of project traffic along Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard is minimal, therefore turning movements were carried to the next intersection. Comment: 4. Project Transportation Impact Mitigation. Please specifically identify the transportation improvements required by the Development Order, provide updated status of each improvement, identify developer's proportionate share calculation and identify the proportionate share payments made to date. Response: 4. The Development. Order roadway improvements have been modified several times. All improvements have been completed and the Development has paid its proportionate share. (See Ordinance #5722-95 Section 4K, attached) The most recent improvements included the widening of Hampton Road and the completion and dedication of Park Place Boulevard to create a through roadway between Drew Street and Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard. (SR 60). I hope these explanations alleviate your concerns. Please call me. if you have any questions. Sincere Robert C. Pergolizzi Vice President Transportation & Planning ACLAmeyer-8.doc cc: Gary_:Tones, C tY.-ofClea t ) George Deakin, (Kimley-Horn) Nicholas Shackleton, (Park Place Land, Ltd.) Timothy Johnson, (Johnson, Blakely, et. al.) F. Subsection 4.F. of the Development Order is hereby deleted. G. Subsection 4.G.1. is hereby deleted. H. Subsection 4.G.2. of the Development Order is amended to read: 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. Subphase-AS-The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidshatl-pay the total cost of these improvements- and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These -improvements are completed 'exSep4'ef d Hamptea-Read.] Subsection 4.G.3 is amended to read as follows: C C 3. Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane divided link (two through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of this improvement shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidshatl--pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. A funding commitment has been made for Tthis improvement which is scheduled by the City of Clearwater for its 1994/1995 *2493 Fiscal Year. J. Subsection 4.G.4. is hereby deleted. K The Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvements in accordance with revised Subsections 4. E.1 through 4.E.3, 4.E.5, 4.G.2., 4.G.3. and 42. of the Development Order. The only remaining obligation of the Developer concerning the transportation improvements is contained in Subsection 4.B.B. of the Development Order, as set forth in Section 4.N. of this Ordinance. L. The build-out year is hereby extended by a cumulative period of nine (9) years through 2000. S7,2_2 a-5?s The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.A.A.: -' A.A. Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 2.44 units of multi-family residential development and/or 1,000 square feet of industrial development to convert to either (i) 633 square feet of office development or (ii) 1.54 units of multi-family residential development are hereby established for the office and industrial areas shown as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and/or 8 on Exhibit "B:" Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) multi-family residential development shall be permitted on Parcels 2, 3 and/or 8 only; (ii) reference to Parcel 2 herein specifically excludes the portion of Parcel 2 which is designated as "Preservation"; and (iii) development shall be limited as follows; MINIMUM MAXIMUM Industrial 100,000" 200,000"' Office 240,560* 858, 820* Multi-family Residential 0** 510** 'square feet of floor area "units N. Thirty (30) days prior to is of. any permit which utilizes the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notice, from the Developer, of the proposed use of the conversion ratio. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. B. B.: 1. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to and accepted by the City prior to issuance . of any development permit for any portion of Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 shown on Exhibit "B,° but in no event later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. The City will cease. to issue any and all building permits and development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B. B.1. 2. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B" shall be completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: 10 s • issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 4 or 6 on Exhibit "B"; or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6, or 7, upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.2. 3. The portions of Park Place Boulevard adjoining Parcels 1, 2 and 3 shown on Exhibit "B" which have been dedicated shall be completely constructed in. accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 2 or 3 shown on Exhibit "B°; or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 1, 2, or 3 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.3. 0. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. C. C.: C.C. In order to facilitate mass transit service to the Park Place development, the Developer will work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority ("PSTA°) as follows: 1. PSTA is allowed to run buses through the development in order to serve Park Place from both Drew Street and Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard. 2. The Developer grants permission to PSTA for the on-site installation of bus stops, benches, and shelters along the main roadway connecting Drew Street and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. 3. The Developer shall endeavor to notify PSTA at least two (2) months in advance of build-out, in order for PSTA to revise the necessary routes and schedules, install bus stops, passenger benches, and passenger shelters. IP/30/2600 THU 10:52 FAX 727 724 8606 FDC Clearwater ... PtORRDADESIGN CONSUL T/Y TSj INC -Mr. John Meyer, AICP DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702- - 191002/006. November 30, 2000 Re: Park'Place DRI (DRI #92) Response to Comments Dear Mr. Meyer: We, have reviewed the comments received in your November 9, 2000 letter; and provide the following responses: - Comment: 1. Intersection Analyses, Truck* Factor. The applicant -has used 'truck factor of two 'percent in.the-intersection analyses. The two percent is acceptable for the current NOPC; but in any future.NOPC analysis it is requested that the actual truck factor, as determined from actual FDOT, Pinellas County or applicant counts, should be used. Response: . Comment- 2. . Response: 2.: . At the August 9; 2000 meeting the review agencies requested a 2% truck factor be used. This was documented 'in my follow=up letter dated August 10, 2000.".- The advice . regarding future NOPC analysis is noted. 'Hopefully. this'will be the last NOPC since, the DRI is nearly built-out. Please note the FDOT axle factors, for.SR_ 60 and US 1.9 are 0.98, so a 2% truck factor would-appear appropriate. DRI Proiect Traffic as a percent of'Intersection Capacity- It appears that the.. applicant needs to update the calculation of-the percentage of project traffic to the . intersection•capaeity for the signalized intersections. The numerator should'be'the sum of'the DRI project traftic'in the HCS critical movements, divided by the.Peak. Hour. Factor (PHF) for each' critical movement; and the denominator is the sum of . the capacities of the critical movements aiaultiplied- by, a factor. of 0.885 to derive the capacity' at level of service D.: Examples of the methodology can be supplied upon request. .The Transportation. Methodology Report (page 4) paragraph V.C'states: "The study area will also include signalized intersection where project traffic-comprises.4.5% or more'of intersection capacity". This- was reiterated in the August 10; 2000 follow-up letter. confirming this methodology was approved' at the methodology meeting. The applicant has followed the approved methodology, 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE. • -CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759. . T91: (727),724-8422 • Fax:,(727) 724-8606 . ,) 0 0 1l/30/2000 THU 10:53 FAX 727.724 8606 FDC Clearwater 1a003/006 Mr. John Meyer November 30, 2000 Page 2 Comment: 3. Proiect Trip Distribution. What was-the basis of the project trip distribution? If it- -was based on FSUTMS analysis, please state when the FSUTMS analysis was- conducted and supply the* review agency with a • copy of the FSUTMS files: Typically a FSUTMS analysis would show a -midblock dissipation of project trips on' Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard west of U.S: 19, however, this is not the case for the project- trip distribution shown in Figure 2, (unnumbered, three, pages after page number 4). Response: 3. Paragraph V:B of the Transportation Methodology Report stated, the project traffic distribution would be -based on 'the FSUTMS 2005 Regional Transportation Analysis model. Figure *1 of the .Methodology. Report- (submitted 2000)% graphically showed this distribution which was reviewed and approved by.all agencies at the August 9', 2000 meeting. The analysis followed this approved- distribution which,was shown in Figure 2 of the report. The mid-block dissipation of project traffic along Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard is minimal, therefore turning movements were carried to -the next intersection. . Comment: 4. Project- Transportation- Impact Mitigation. ..Please. specifically identify the transportation.improvements required by.the-Development Order, provide•updatedl status of each -improvement, -identify developer's proportionate share calculation . and identify the proportionate share payments; made to date. Response- .4. The Develbpment, Order roadway improvements have been .modified several times. -All improvements have been completed and the Development has paid its proportionate share.. (See Ordinance #5722-95 Section 4K,- attached), The most recent improvements included the widening of Hampton Road and the completion and dedication of Park Place Boulevard to create a through roadway between Drew. Street and Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard. (SR 60). I hope these explanations alleviate your concerns. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincere , Robert C: Pergolizzi Vice President Transportation & Planning r WmArneyer-8.doc cc: Gary Jones, (City of Clearwater) George Deakin, (Kimley-Hom) Nicholas Shackleton, (Park Place Land, Ltd.) Timothy Johnson, (Johnson, Blakely, at.. al.) I E .i J 5 ti ? o Cl? o • O i 11/30/2000 THU 10:50 FAX 727 724 8606 FDC Clearwater 2004/006 (DqT)tNANCe'- f'pffa'ed V 14 h 5 F. Subsection 4_F, of the Development Order is hereby deleted. G. Subsection 4.G.1. is hereby deleted- H. Subsection 4.G.2, of the Development Order is amended to read: 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two, south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. These Impinavements re-to ase-A3. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z,, the Developer has paidshafl-pay the total cost of these improvements, and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. - [These -improvements are completed csapt - Hamptea-ead] Subsection 4.G.3 is amended to read as follows: C 3. Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane divided link (two through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by -Subphase A3. The cost of this improvement shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has . paidsha# -pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement A funding commitment has been made for Tthis improvement which is scheduled by the City of Clearwater for its 1994/1995'92P93 Fiscal Year. J. Subsection 4.G.4. is hereby deleted. K. The Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvements in accordance with revised Subsections 4.E.1 through 4.E.3, 4.E.5, 4.G.2., 4.G.3. and 42. of the Development Order. The only remaining obligation of the Developer concerning the transportation improvements is contained in Subsection 4.13.13. of the Development Order, as set forth in Section 4.N. of this Ordinance. L. The build-out year is hereby extended by a cumulative period of nine (9) years through 2000. ?7? ;2 - ?P. 0 11/30/2000 THU 10:53 FAX 727 724 8606 FDC Clearwater lip M. • 121005/006 The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.A_A_: AA Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 2.44 units of multi-family residential development and/or 1,000 square feet of industrial development to convert to either (i) 533 square feet of office development or (ii) 1.54 units of multifamily residential development are hereby established for the office and industrial areas shown as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and/or 8 on Exhibit "B:" Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) multi-family residential development shall be permitted on Parcels 2, 3 and/or 8 only; (ii) reference to Parcel 2 herein specifically excludes the portion of Parcel 2 which is designated as "Preservation"; and (iii) development shall be limited as follows; :."MINIMUM MAXIMUM Industrial 100,060- 200,000} Office 240,560*_' 858,820* Multi-family Residential 0** 51044 'square feet of floor area "units Thirty (30) days prior to issuance of. any permit which utilizes the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notice, from the Developer, of the proposed use of the conversion ratio. N.. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. B. B.: The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any development permit for any portion of Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 shown on Exhibit "B," but in no event later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. The City will cease. to issue any and all building permits and development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.I. 2. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "6° shall be completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: c 10 r 7,,? -2 - / LJ 11/30/2000 THU 10 54 FAX 727 724 8606 FDC Clearwater • IaOO6/006 (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 4 or 6 on Exhibit "B"; or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 4, 5. 6, or 7, upon failure to comply with this Subsection B. B.2. 3. The portions of Park Place Boulevard adjoining Parcels 1, 2 and 3 shown on Exhibit °B" which have been dedicated shall be completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 2 or 3 shown on' Exhibit °B°; or (ii) December 31, 1998. 0. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 1, 2, or 3 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.3. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. C. C.. C.C. In order to facilitate mass transit service to the Park Place development, the Developer will work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (°PSTA") as follows: . 1. PSTA is allowed to ran buses through the development in order to serve Park Place from both Drew Street and Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard. 2. The Developer grants permission to PSTA for the on-site installation of bus stops, benches, and shelters along the main roadway connecting Drew Street and Guff-to-Bay Boulevard. J 3. The Developer shall endeavor to notify PSTA at least two (2) months in advance of build-out, in order for PSTA to revise the necessary routes and schedules, install bus stops, passenger benches, and passenger shelters. • • h' a 1 O, 00 THU 10:52 FAX 727 724 8606 FDC Clearwater 2001/006 F191 FCQRtA [111*? CQNSWLTAN7S, ANC. ,f;NGrNRS: EAi?VfRONME(?TA[1575>SURVEYO'kS&.?WVIVERS PXV ! COVMR ' ,?`HEET . D?AT'E.: 3O' :TIiVIE: TO: p??e ,?.. PH?ONB: TAX. aLO FROM'.. ?b r'r= i,1?7i . SHONE: (.727) 724-8422.. . FAX: (72'?7)'724-8606 ZT, :1 iV1$ R O ? PAGES !CL- _ 6COYB$ -SHEET ( j ? 411' tir. ?7 \??F T Qlr Hard cop?r ins Boris egular bail,.Qs?emi ]it 11iIai1; (. r) None to Follow. ,'t`he iuforniatieri xitained in. We Oausmissivn is. priVil?eti. and. cdrifidenti?l. Yt is-jnt>rii?ded ?'or the iise of Ihe? ?ndivi?tial ox en y, airied"above+ ftli ea a of this inessage:i not.the interideti addressee; the saad _ . ' 'i" hereby. notified: thati any con?i$erati0ri, 'dis$etr?inatiori' of duplication -0 this . con=uWcaOon is stixctiy . "prolviliited. Hthe recipjO it:has. -tetiexved tlifs CoxJorimuni atio i"xt .(Kro please t}un this' raps iiss orr"tQ .us at ttiie'-a? Qve address-by mail: -ims commui?ication*s.ieceived.in the U;s_; please=riot -f r us uiim0iately_. by phone. THANK.YOUI 2639'McCORMICK DRly'E CLf?AfiWAT?A,.FLORbA 33769 (727) 724=8422.- FAX?(727) 724-8606 0- M?a- STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH STEVEN M. SEIBERT Governor Secretary November 15, 2000 Mr. Gary L. Jones, AICP City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 RE: Park Place File No. ADA-83-002 Dear Mr. Jones: On October 12, 2000, the applicants representative, Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, rendered a Notice of Proposed Change for the Park Place development of regional impact to the Department. Pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes, the proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation to the development order. The applicant has not provided sufficient information to rebut that presumption. Both the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Transportation have commented on this proposed change. Their comments and objections are attached. The Department is concerned about the transportation analyses, projections and mitigation factors utilized by the applicant. To overcome this objection, the applicant should specifically identify the proportionate share calculation of each required traffic improvement and the share payments made to date; the applicant should identify the basis for the project trip distribution calculations made; and further define the intersection capacity calculations made. Further, while the truck factors used by the applicant are accurate now, they will need to be updated in any subsequent NOPC application. If you have any additional questions, please contact Mark Neuse, Planner IV, at (850) 922-1798. QW%kO-)-- Charles Gauthier, AICP Chief, Bureau of Local Planning CG:mn enclosures cc: Timothy A. Johnson, applicants representative John Meyer, TBRPC 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.f I. us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 • Tampa Say regional Planning Council Chairman vice-Chairman Commissioner Chris Hart Frederick T Reeves November 9, 2000 Mr. Timothy A, Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Blakely et al 91`1 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Mayor Pat Whitesel Manny L. Pumariega NOV 13 r 2000 u i PLAN RPM BSP CESSING TEAM Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Johnson: The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has reviewed the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) submitted for the Park Place Development of Regional Impact. On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 601U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. The Development Order currently expires on September 1, 2003. The currently a roved phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT '? OFFICE 5V ,INDUSTRIAL;? 46 ,RETAIL ? , W _W! RESIDENTIA NN, -A ? g ,BUILDOUT (Sgg Ftr) `a?(Sq ;Ft ) ey` r'(Sq `Ft') w ulti FarriilV vUni ts M ) (M q h ._ .,spawn }.tMR,Fa,:.!mMcxzas,' Dec. 31, 2000 635,680 200,000 150,000 390 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 http://www.tbrpc.org • The NOPC Application, which was received on October 11, 2000, requested the following modifications to the Development Order: • Extend project buildout by three years (to December 31, 2003). This represent a cumulative extension of 12 years; • reduce authorized office space by 234,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,800 sq. ft.(to 81,120 sq. ft.); • provide a land use equivalency factor for Parcel #6 to potentially convert office use to multi- family residential or hotel use; and • revise the Development Plan ("Map H") accordingly. A revised transportation analysis was included within the NOPC submittal to address these changes, as required by Chapter 380.06, F.S. These proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes. Several issues, noted below, need to be clarified before it can be determined if sufficient information has been supplied to rebut the presumption. Intersection Analyses, Truck Factor. The applicant has used a truck factor of two percent in the intersection analyses. The two percent is acceptable for the current NOPC, but in any future NOPC analysis it is requested that the actual truck factor, as determined from actual FDOT, Pinellas County or applicant counts, should be used. 2. DRI Project Traffic as a percent of Intersection Capacity. It appears that the applicant needs to update the calculation of the percentage of project traffic to the intersection capacity for the signalized intersections. The numerator should be the sum of the DRI project traffic in the HCS critical movements, divided by the Peak Hour Factor (PHF) for each critical movement; and the denominator is the sum of the capacities of the critical movements multiplied by a factor of 0.885 to derive the capacity at level of service D. Examples of the methodology can be supplied upon request. 3. Project Trip Distribution. What was the basis of the project trip distribution? If it was based on a FSUTMS analysis, please state when the FSUTMS analysis was conducted and supply the review agency with a copy of the FSUTMS files. Typically a FSUTMS analysis would show a midblock dissipation of project trips on Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard west of U.S. 19, however this is not the case for the project trip distribution shown in Figure 2, (unnumbered, three pages after page number 4). 4. Project Transportation Impact Mitigation. Please specifically identify the transportation improvements required by the Development Order, provide updated status of each improvement, identify developer's proportionate share calculation and identify the proportionate share payments made to date. 0 I have attached copies of comments received from the Florida Department of Transportation regarding your proposal which should also be addressed. No additional comments have been received from any of the other review parties identified below. If correspondences are received from these agencies in the near future and you are not already copied, I will immediately forward a copy to your attention. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me (ext. 255). Thank you. Sincerely, 5.ineyer or D ator JMM cc: Nick Shackleton, PPLL Kent Fast, FDOT Robert Pergolizzi, FDC Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Manna Pennington, FDCA1 George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Gary Jones, City of Clearwater Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH GOVERNOR November 8, 2000 Mr. Gary L. Jones, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRI#92) Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Jones: THOMAS F. BARRY, JR. SECRETARY We reviewed the Notice of proposed Change application for the Park Place DRI in Clearwater. Please find below our comments related to this proposed change. • There does appear to be a reduction in land use intensities which would result in a lower PM peak hour traffic impact to nearby roadways. • The increased utilization of a land use mix could well cause some increase in internal capture, which would also reduce the impact on nearby roadways. • The land use exchange rates offered with the application seem consistent with the respective land use trip generation rates offered in ITE. • Our only traffic question has to do with Hampton Road near the subject property. Both site driveways (near Parcel 6) which intersect with Hampton Road were analyzed as stop controlled intersections, as appropriate. However, the Hampton Road signalized intersection at SR 60 was not included in the analysis. Why? • The City may want to restrict the left turns on south bound Hampton Road at the SR 60 intersection if there is a safety concern. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Kent Fast, AICP DRI Coordinator. www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER • Mr. Gary L Jones, AICP November 8, 2000 Page 2 0 cc: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Florida Design Consultants, Inc. George Deakin, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. John Meyer, Tampa Bay RPC Marina Pennington, Dept. of Community Affairs Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Tim Johnson, Johnson,Blakely,Pope,Bokor,Ruppel & Burns, P.A. F: \p17301d\dri_revi\dri0O\OO 11O8.92.doc ?I' I 1 Tampa Bay,R.egional Planning Council Chairman vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Commissioner Chris Hart Frederick T Reeves Mayor Pat whitesel October 12, 2000 Mr. Timothy A, Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Blakely et al 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Executive Director Manny L. Pumariega Subject: DR[ #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Johnson: On October 11, 2000, the Council received the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) application for the aforementioned project. The required review fee and contract have previously been submitted in accordance with Section 9J-2.0252(6), Florida Administrative Code. Consistent with Section 380.06(19)(F)4., F.S., the October 11, 2000 receipt date of this document initiates the 30-day review period of the Council. Therefore, comments regarding your application will be submitted by November 10, 2000. Those comments received from the review parties (identified below) will be appended to our transmittal. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me here at the Council (ext. 255). Thank you. cc: Nick Shackleton, PPLL Robert Pergolizzi, FDC Marina Pennington, FDCA Gary Jones, City of Clearwater Kent Fast, FDOT Al Navaroli, Pinellas County 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 570-51 18 State Nur http://www. tbrpc.Org F v E VELOPMEN CES ARWATER L2/12/2001 12:17 3055608196 HTG PAGE 01/01 0 46 HTG COMMERCIAL GROUF, INC. 3225 Aviation,kwnue ¦ PH Suite - Coconut Grove, FL 33133 • Tel: 305.860.81.88 P .Fax: 305.860.8196 . www.HousingTYustGroup.com December 12, 2001 Mr. Ffnl. Udoh City of Clearwater Plaxtnirg Department P.O. B nx: 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 RE., Park Place Clearwater DRI Status Report Dear Mr. Udoh: I refer to my letter of December I O'h and our subsequent telephone This le tter is to confirm my voice mail message left with you yesterday. ULL 1 G 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEFT CITY OF CLEARWATER I can corsirm that King Engineering (I would presume instructed by Highwoods) commenced work c n the 2001 Status Report in November and that it should be completed very shortly. This war, confirmed to me by Mr. Keith A.ppenzeller, one of the principals of King Engineering and I have asked him whether he would be kind enough to forward me copy. I have also asked that he ensure that you receive copy too. Thank you. Your e?cerely, Na.cgeton Presidoni: HTG Commercial Group, Inc. cc: 1 4r. Tim Johnson Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel and Burns, P.A. 1W Keith A.ppenzeller I?;.ing Ezz?izaeerinig "a, Pareimile_(727) 562-4576 ® A HOUSING TRUST GROUP COMPANY L2/10/2001 14:58 0608196 HTG PAGE 01 3225 Aviatioti /, imue - PH Suite - Decei Der 10, 2001 Mr. Etim. Udoh City of Clearwater Planning :Department P.O. B,)x; 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: Park Place, Dear Mr,. Udoh: I have tried to phone you Johnso n, regarding the pr CoMMERcin GRouP, INC. Grove, FL 33133 - Tel: 305.860.8188 ¦ Fax: 305.860.8196 ¦ www.HousuigTrustGrouP.com na Facsimile (727) S62-4576 DRI Status Report d tunes to follow up on your discussion with our attorney, Tim ion of this year's DRI Status Report. We hiul assumed that this report would have been promoted by Highwoods as the currently active developer within the p k (they have been building and leasing 380 Park Place Boulei ard) and we are wend(ring who prepared the last available report. W&,; it Highwoods? Who I would lie extremely gratefu for myoffice is 1-800-378-7( '' T yt:?u very much. 1 Nick SImckleton Presidont HT+G Commercial Group, Ins NS/cs/F! the engineers? if we could speak regarding this matter. The toll free number AW L?W-4 ?, f?o' WA!? 7 A HOUSING TRUST GROUP COMPANY f DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY CLERK ?.1/?17z72?/?/ C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 CITY HALL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4090 FAx (727) 562-4086 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Attention: Jane Dear Jane: Enclosed is a copy of City of Clearwater Ordinance 6678-01, adopted February 1, 2001, amending the Development Order for Park Place, a Development of Regional Impact. In accordance with distribution instructions on page 5 of the ordinance, I have mailed copies to Park Place Land, Ltd., Florida Department of Community Affairs, and Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. If I may be of further assisance, please feel free to call me at (727) 562-4095. Sincerely, All? Gwen Legters Legislative Staff Assistant gjl Enclosure cc: Park Place Land, Ltd., 3225 Aviation Ave, Ste. 700, Coconut Grove, FL 33133 State of Florida DCA, 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd., Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 John M. Meyer, DRI Coord., TBRPC BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER BOB CLARK, COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER F. DAVID HEMERICK, COMMISSIONER D-12 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" February 7, 2001 0 • ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; REDUCING APPROVED OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and 1 Ordinance No. 6678-01 WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, and 6107-96, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2 Ordinance No. 6678-01 • • I B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 6 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Reducing approved office and retail space; 2. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and 3. Extending the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional 3 Ordinance No. 6678-01 • • J impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for 390 multi-family dwelling. units and a total maximum floor area of 1,145-,52-9_ 685.759 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795,52-0 404.639 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 150, = 81.120 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factors set forth in Subsection 4.A.A. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. 4 Ordinance No. 6678-01 • C. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to either (i) 2.4 multi-family units or (ii) 2.44 hotel rooms are hereby established for the office area shown as Parcel 6 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: LAND USE TRADE-OFF RATES PARCEL 6 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT MAY BE CONVERTED To: 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.4 Multi-Family Units 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.44 Hotel Rooms Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel6 shall be limited as follows: MINIMUM MAXIMUM Office 0* 100,000- Multi-Family 0** ill** Hotel 0** 185*** * square feet of floor area ** units *** rooms D. The buildout date is hereby extended to December 31, 2003. E. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. F. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. G. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. 5 Ordinance No. 6678-01 • 0 H. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. I. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-_ ides Assistant City Attorney January 18, 2001 February 1, 2001 Brian ungs Mayor - Co missioner Attest: r?G=d?k.rcJ ? Cyn is . Goudeau City Clerk 6 Ordinance No. 6678-01 • • 0 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01°04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. 7 0 • EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 8 DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 2001000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST) EXISTING _ ACCESS a ° NATURAL ° AREA vi a _ OFFICE ?JP?o PARCEL 2 p ?. ° 82,179 SF OFFICE 0°Jv MULTI-FAMILY ° PARCEL 8 101,900 SF a (82,179 SF UNDER PARCEL 4 156 D.U. < CONSTRUCTION) (101.900 SF EXISTING) G2V = ?P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Q MULTI-FAMILY COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF (120,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) PARCEL 7 IST ON ( PARCELS 7XAND 9) ,? PARCEL 10 Ll. (11,303 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD e? QP PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (100,000 SF OFFICE PUNNED) Q?I-OE 220,560 F F COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,4.60 S 182,179 SF 404.639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100000 SF 100 000 SF 200 , ,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU TOTAL 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO r1e>as: T. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE ARE ASED ON BEST FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS THE B AMOUNT OF TOTAL AVAILABLE µARKET INFORMATION AND ARE BJECT TO CHANGE DEVELOPMEN DEVELOPMENT T, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEEGU THE AMOUNT OF APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. 1HE BUILD-OUT GATE FOR THE PUNNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE' TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2007. 3. CONVERSION FATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 833 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE $5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, }, 6 AND B. $. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MA UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 MOTEL XIMUM OF 240 ROOMS MTN A MAXIMUM OF FREVISED.: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 COMMERICAL 25,842 SF 2M UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6. (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) P FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ...,....._., ENGINEERS, ENVIRGNMENTAIATS, SORVEYO.SS B PLANNERS PARK PLACE D R I MASTER MAP • H EXHIBIT B TO l!" ""' e ? -,,.: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PARK PLACE ORI NOPL EXISTING ACCESS ACCESS 4 a e Tampa 8aV Zeglonal Planning Councll Chairman Mayor Pat whitesel March 12, 2001 ? l??JePq?k,?lQ?e vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Terrye Bradley Councilman Jerry King Manny L. Pumariega The Honorable Brian Aungst Mayor of the City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Subject: DR1 #92 - Park Place, Development Order Amendment Report, City of Clearwater Dear Mayor Aungst: The enclosed agenda item regarding the above-referenced project was considered and approved by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at its March 12, 2001 meeting. Please contact the Council staff if further information concerning this item is needed. Sincerely, Pat Whitesel Chairman P W/bj Enclosure cc: Mr. Nick Shackleton Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq. iMs. Cindy Hardin ' Ms. Marina Pennington 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570.5151 FAX (727) 570-51 18 State Number 513-5066 http://www.tbrpc.org Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council n DOAIR Consent Agenda 03/12/01 Agenda Item #3.D.2 ADOPTED Development Order Amendment Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 577-5151 Suncom 586-3217 FAX (727) 570-5118 hftp://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On February 9, 2001, the City of Clearwater rendered to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Ordinance No. 6678-01, a Development Order amendment for the aforementioned DRI adopted by the City Council on February 1, 2001. The Amendment authorizes several changes to the Development Order. BACKGROUND On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,103,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 150,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. Since the project has been previously consolidated into a single phase, this represents a cumulative buildout extension of 18 years. This inference to 1985 marks the initial Phase I buildout date. The following represents the approved phasing schedule, inclusive of the current modifications: PROJECT B UT 0 ' - ??Y°E' _.' OFFICE S Ft ?` INDUSTRIAL Sq Ft r ` REZA L ?( T `RESINT?AL x. M6 UIL , - q ) ( ? ? ),? = ( q ? ?'? n a k?4 a [11tS n R. 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT The Development Order Amendment authorized the following changes: • reduction of office space by 231,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,880 sq. ft. (to 81,120 sq. ft.); • allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and • further extended the project buildout date by three additional years (to December 31, 2003). 0 RECOMMENDATION In accordance with Section 380.07, Florida Statutes (F.S.), this Development Order amendment has been reviewed for consistency with Subsections 380.06(19)(c) and with the Council's Final Report adopted July 11, 1983. It has been determined that the reductions in office and retail space would more than suffice in "offsetting" any potential unmitigated regional impacts experienced through a further extension of project buildout by three years. Therefore, it is recommended that the Department of Community Affairs concur with the Development Order amendment issued by the City of Clearwater for DRI #92 - Park Place. BOARD OF COUN'T`Y COMMISSIONFIRS. Development Review Services Department Working Together to Serve You Better COMMISSIONERS: - - - CALVIN D. HARRIS : CHAIRMAN March 20, 2001. BARBARA SHEEN Tooo = vlcE cHwRMAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUSAN LATVALA JOHN MORRONI Pinellas County Courthouse; 315 Court St. KAREN WILLIAMS sEEL Clearwater, FL. 33756 ROBERT B. STEWART KENNETH T. WELCH Re:. Case No.. LU/CU 6-4-01 PINELLAS COUNTY UTILITIES ATTN. PICK TALLEY, APPLICANT Location of subject property. approximately 2:5 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, 332 ft. north of_Curlew Road. A request for a change of land use from Residential/Open, Space to. Transportation Utility and a Conditional Use to Permit a reclaimed water storage facility. Public hearing(s) regarding the use of the subject property described, above will be held by the Zoning Examiner on April 2; 2001 at 9:00 AM in the Clerk's Conference Room 4th Floor, 315 Court Street,. Clearwater and by the Board of County Commissioners on May 15, 2001 at 6:30 PM 'or as soon thereafter:.as"possible, in the . BCC Assembly Room, 5th Floor, 315 Court Street, Clearwater. Failure by tile' applicant or, an authorized representative of the applicant to appear at the scheduled public hearing(s) may result in an automatic denial of Ahe request. Other interested persons may also appear at the public hearing(s) and be heard.. Further information relative to public hearings: 1. Written correspondence may be directed to.the.Pinellas County Development Review Services Department, 310 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 3'3756, or you may fax us.at..(727) 464-3.98.1. If you desire to'submit any written. materials (i:e: rts,.arguments, studies et cetera) to the Board of County Commissioners they must be received not less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. Failure to timely submit those materials may result in them not being included as part of the record.before the Board and thus not be considered by the Board in their deliberations. 2. Persons are advised that if they decide to appeal any decision made at this meeting/hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. 3. If your are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you to the 'provision of certain assistance. Within two (2) working days of your receipt of this (describe notice/order) please contact the Office of Human Rights, 400 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Ste 300 Clearwater; FL 33756 (727) 464-4062 (V/TDD). . 4. Cases are generally heard in accordance with an agenda, but because presentation timesi differ; it is not possible for us to give a specific starting time. for cases. It is expected that presentations before the Board will be efficient and,will adhere, to the extent possible, to the time guidelines established in Section 134-14 . of the Pinellas County Land. Development Code. 5. The public hearing before the Board is governed by the procedures established in Section 134-14 of the Pinellas County Ladd Development Code. If you have questions relative to this request, please call us at (727) 464-5047. 31.0 Court Street, Clearwater, .Florida 33756 Telephone: (727) 464-3888 Fax: (727) 464-3981 Internet: DRSGROUP®CO.PINELLAS.FL.US "Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer 6 Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace t? printed on recycled paper PINELLAS COUNTY Development Review Services Department 310 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 IMPOfANT PUBLIC HEARING NOTTIICE !! 0 0 NOTICE PUBLIC HEARIIAG AND INTENT TO ADOPT ORDINANCE The Safety Harbor City Commission will meet in regular session on Monday, April 2, 2001 at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in Commission Chambers, 750 Main Street, Safety Harbor, to consider adoption of the following ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2001-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF RECENTLY ANNEXED PROPERTY (AN/ZO 2000-115) LOCATED AT 790 HARBOR HILL DRIVE, SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" HERETO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERLOCAL PLANNING AGREEMENT WITH PINELLAS COUNTY SUBJECT TO CERTAIN INTENSITY AND DENSITY RESTRICTIONS; FINDING THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND THE REVIEW STANDARDS OF SECTION 226.03 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE The Commission proposes to adopt this Ordinance on April 16, 2001. At this meeting any citizen may appear to be heard, or may file written approval or objection with the City Clerk prior to the meetings. Ordinances and other pertinent documents are available for review in the office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 750 Main Street, Safety Harbor, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Persons are advised that, if they decide to appeal any decision made at this meeting/hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and, for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Any person with a disability requiring reasonable accommodation in order to participate in this meeting, should call 727-724-1555 (Voice/TDD) or fax a written request to 727-724-1566. If you are hearing impaired and require the services of an interpreter, please call at least one week prior to the meeting and the City will arrange to provide that service for you. For the slightly to moderately hearing impaired, a personal assistive listening device is available upon request, from the City Clerk or Board Recording Secretary. CITY OF SAFETY HA BOR, FLORIDA Bonita Haynes, MMC City Clerk 0 0 6 ,OLD HARBOR PLACE ra a a 0 a oa z w J J U f SOXIA PERRACE FIRST BAPTIST V CHURCH N OAK HAVEN DRIVE WINDING WI D'R W 7 oc A J DRIVE °? PA M? p IH R 0 ST S 1 1 1 , I? I I I I I ? 1 1 ? 1 ? 1 1 1 I I f l i t l 1, 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1! I, t l I I I I I! 1 1 1 0 1, 1, E I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1; 1 t l l 11 1 1 1 1 i N w Q s 0, R MOBILE REVISIONS CITY of SAFETY HARBOR By DATE PLANNING DEPT., 750 MAIN STREET DATE SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA, 34695 12/29/2000 PHONE (727) 724-1555 DRAWING NUMBER PLAN RESPESS PROPERTY AN/ZO 2000-915 790 Harbor Hill Drive SHEET SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 1 0! 1 z? Tampa Say -egional Planning Council Chairman vice-Chairman Secretary/-FYeasurer Executive Director Mayor Pat whitesel Terrye Bradley Councilman Jerry King Manny L. Pumariega March 2, 2001 Mr. Nick Shackleton Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue, Suite 700 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Re: DRI #92 - Park Place, Development Order Amendment Report, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Shackleton: The above-referenced item will be considered at the March 12, 2001 meeting of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council which will be held at the Council offices at 10:00 a.m. A copy of the report and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative wish to attend. If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 570-5151, Ext. 255. J MM bj z Enclosures cc: GMs. Cindy_Hardin_ Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq. Ms. Marina Pennington 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702.2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 http://www.tbrpc.org Tampa 8av X egional Planning Council LJ DOAR Consent Agenda 03/12/01 Agenda Item #3.D.2 Development Order Amendment Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 577-5151 Suncom 586-3217 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On February 9, 2001, the City of Clearwater rendered to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Ordinance No. 6678-01, a Development Order amendment for the aforementioned DRI adopted by the City Council on February 1, 2001. The Amendment authorizes several changes to the Development Order. BACKGROUND On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,103,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 150,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. Since the project has been previously consolidated into a single phase, this represents a cumulative buildout extension of 18 years. This inference to 1985 marks the initial Phase I buildout date. The following re resents the approve d phasing schedule, inclusive of the current modifications: PROJECT OFFICE INDUSTRIAL RETAIL ;RESIDENTIAL ?,BUILDOUT ; (Sq:°Ft.)- . , (Sq.,Ft:)' `(Sg: Ft.) =`(Multi-Family - Units) 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT The Development Order Amendment authorized the following changes: • reduction of office space by 231,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639.sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,880 sq. ft. (to 81,120 sq. ft.); • allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and • further extended the project buildout date by three additional years (to December 31, 2003). r ? RECOMMENDATION In accordance with Section 380.07, Florida Statutes (F.S.), this Development Order amendment has been reviewed for consistency with Subsections 380.06(19)(c) and with the Council's Final Report adopted July 11, 1983. It has been determined that the reductions in office and retail space would more than suffice in "offsetting" any potential unmitigated regional impacts experienced through a further extension of project buildout by three years. Therefore, it is recommended that the Department of Community Affairs concur with the Development Order amendment issued by the City of Clearwater for DRI #92 - Park Place. ?T- I 1 Tampa Bay 7Z.egional Planning Council Chairman Commissioner Chris Hart December 29, 2000 vice-Chairman Frederick T Reeves Mr. Nick Shackleton Park Place land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue, Suite 700 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Mayor Pat whitesel Manny L. Pumariega E wE E ? tit JAN - 2 2001 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Re: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change Report, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Shackleton: The above-referenced item will be considered at the January 8, 2001 meeting of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council which will be held at the Council offices at 9:00 a.m. A copy of the report and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative wish to attend. If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 570-5151, Ext. 255. Sincerely, o eyer DRI Coordinator JM M/bj Enclosures cc: Ms::tiCindy:Hardty ofiClearwater Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq. Ms. Marina Pennington, DCA pwk f'lga /t/Gm 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702.2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 http://www.tbrpc.org • • 3` Consent Agenda Agenda Item #2C -- ---- 01/08/01 Tampa Bav.Regional Planning Council NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE (NOPC) REPORTS 1. DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater It has been determined that the Notice of Proposed Change is not a Substantial Deviation to the Development Order. 2. DRI #140 - Tampa Triangle, Hillsborough County Since this project is governed by the Sustainable Communities Agreement for the City of Tampa: and Hillsborough County, this amendment has not been evaluated for consistency with the Florida Statutes, Local Government Comprehensive Plan(s), the Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan or the Final Report issued for the project. A summary of the changes is provided exclusively for informational purposes only. Staff Contact: John Meyer, ext. 255 Additional Material: NOPC Reports for DRIs #92 and #140. Action Recommended: Approval of staff reports Consent Agenda 01/08/01 Agenda Item #2.C.1 N OP*C L Tampa 8avXegional Planning Council Notice of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,103,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 150,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. Since the project has been previously consolidated into a single phase, this represents a cumulative buildout extension of 18 years. This inference to 1985 marks the initial Phase I buildout date. The currentlv-anuroved phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT OFFICE INDUSTRIAL` M RETAIL _ RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft) (Sq. Ft.) ., . (Multi-Family Units) 2000 635,680 200,000 150,000 390 The developer requests the following changes to the Development Order: reduction of office space by 231,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,880 sq. ft. (to 81,120 sq. ft.); allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and further extend the project buildout date by an additional three years (to December 31, 2003). The reduction in development parameters does not constitute a Substantial Deviation. The additional extension requested does constitute a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: "An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact. An extension of the date of buildout, or any phase thereof, of 5 years or more but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a • • substantial deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. An extension of less than 5 years is not a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a buildout, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time." As identified above, the aforementioned modifications are presumed to constitute a Substantial Deviation to the Development Order. However, the applicant has rebutted this presumption upon the submittal of a sufficient transportation analysis. Therefore, no unmitigated regional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed modifications. Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that applicant has rebutted the presumption of a substantial deviation to the Development Order. • Tampa Bay regional Planning Council Agendta Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Blvd. - Suite 219 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 9:00 a.m. January 8, 2001 Note: To speak or to appeal a Council Action see last page. *** THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC *** • Agenda Item #1 Chairman Hart CALL TO ORDER • Invocation and Pledge Recording Secretary Roll Call Recording Secretary Voting Conflict Report Sec/Treasurer Whitesel Approval of Minutes • Agenda Item #2 CONSENT AGENDA Chairman Hart • Agenda Item #3 BIG PICTURE UPDATE Chairman Hart • Agenda Item #4 GROWTH MANAGEMENT STUDY COMMISSION Chairman Hart • Agenda Item #5 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Chairman Hart • Agenda Item #6 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mr. Manny Pumariega • Agenda Item #7 NEXT MEETING Chairman Hart Friday, January 19, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Embassy Suites Hotel 3705 Spectrum Boulevard Tampa, Florida • Agenda Item #8 ADJOURN Chairman Hart 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org 0 9 The Council, in accordance with its adopted rules of procedure, may only take action on matters not on the printed agenda involving the exercise of agency discretion and policy-making upon a finding by the Council of an emergency situation affecting the public's health, safety, and welfare. Council meetings are Public Meetings within the context of Section 286.011, Florida Statutes. Council meetings are not Public Hearings within the context of Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. The Chairman has full discretion as to whether or not to recognize speakers other than Council members or staff, and is not required to recognize individuals to speak on issues before the Council. Public Hearings on issues before the Council are conducted by individual local governments, and are the proper forum for public comment. Please note that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with.respect to any matter considered at the above cited meeting or hearing, s/he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, s/he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Persons wishing to speak at a Council meeting are required to complete the form provided at the entrance to the meeting room. The form, after being completed, must be given to the Recording Secretary. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this meeting you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at 727-570-5151 within 3 working days of the meeting. 0 D 0 ;r1 1 FTIT Tampa Sav eglonal Planning Councll Chairman Commissioner Chris Hart Vice-Chairman Frederick T Reeves Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Mayor Pat Whitesel Manny L. Pumariega December 15, 2000 Ms. Cindy Hardin, Asst. Planning Director City of Cleanvater 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 EWE 1 CFC 18 20M PLANNING & DEmopMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater, Notice of Proposed Change Report Dear Ms. Hardin: Per our telephone conversation, the staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed our review of the aforementioned NOPC in accordance with Section 380.06(19), F.S. In conclusion, the applicant has rebutted the presumption of a Substantial Deviation. Please note that this Report will appear on the agenda for the next Council meeting (January 19, 2001). If you should have any questions about the Report, please do not hesitate to contact me at extension 255. Thank you. Sincerely, eyer DRI Coordinator Attachment cc: Timothy Johnson Nick Shackleton, PPLL Robert Pergolizzi, FDC Marina Pennington, FDCA Kent Fast, FDOT Al Navaroli, Pinellas County George Deakin, Kimley-Horn 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 http://www.tbrpc.org Tampa8aVXegional Ranninq Council NO ?-JC Notice of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,103,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 150,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. Since the project has been previously consolidated into a single phase, this represents a cumulative buildout extension of 18 years. This inference to 1985 marks the initial Phase I buildout date. The currently-approved phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT OFFICE INDUSTRIAL RETAIL. RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT (Sq. Ft.) (Sq.,Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Multi-Family Units) 2000 635,680 200,000 150,000 390 The developer request the following changes to the Development Order: reduction of office space by 231,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,880 sq. ft. (to 81,120 sq. ft.); allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and further extend the project buildout date by an additional three years (to December 3!, 2003). The reduction in development parameters does not constitute a Substantial Deviation. The additional extension requested does constitute a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: "An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact. An extension of the date of buildout, or any phase thereof, of 5 years or more but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a 9 0 substantial deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. An extension of less than 5 years is not a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a buildout, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time." As identified above, the aforementioned modifications are presumed to constitute a Substantial Deviation to the Development Order. However, the applicant has rebutted this presumption upon the submittal of a sufficient transportation analysis. Therefore, no unmitigated regional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed modifications. Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that applicant has rebutted the presumption of a substantial deviation to the Development Order. • ! CDB Meeting Date: December 12, 2000 CDB Item #: C-1 CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 REPRESENTATIVE: Tim Johnson, Esq., Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. i LOCATION: Generally located between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Drew Street from Hampton Road to the U. S. 19 Frontage Road Legally described as a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. More particularly described in attached legal description. REQUEST: To amend the approved Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order through the Notification of Proposed Change process to: 1. Reduce approved office and retail space; 2. Provide a land use conversion factor for multifamily and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of the DRI; and 3. Extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31, 2003. SITE INFORMATION DRI SIZE: 99 acres DRI PROPERTY USES: Current Use: Retail, Office and Residential Proposed Use: Addition of multifamily and/or hotel use in Parcel 6 9 PLAN CATEGORY: Current Categories: Proposed Category ZONING DISTRICT: Current Districts: Proposed Districts EXISTING Industrial Limited, Residential/Office/Retail, Residential/Office General, Commercial General and Preservation Same Industrial Research and Technology (IRT), Office (O), Commercial (C) and Preservation (P) Same SURROUNDING USES: North: Multifamily Residential, Retirement Residence, Nursing Home and Open Space South: Commercial East: Mobile Home Park, Single Family Residential West: Commercial DRI HISTORY: The DRI's development order was adopted by the Clearwater City Commission on September 1, 1983. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on October 20, 1983 to incorporate Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council recommendations. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on December 19, 1991 to provide 200,000 square feet for Industrial use and reduce Office use by 300,000 square feet; provide an F.A.R. for Industrial use; amending conditions based on phasing; amending the developer's payment schedule; and extending the buildout date by five years. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on January 19, 1995 to modify phasing; decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; extending the buildout date by four years; adding a conversion factor for Office use to Multifamily Residential and adding a conversion factor for Industrial use to Office or Multifamily Residential; and modifying conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on November 21, 1996 adding a land use conversion factor to Parcel 4 for office and/or hotel development and reflecting a change in ownership. Park Place DRI 2000 ANALYSIS Introduction This Development of Regional Impact (DRI) amendment is requested by the property owner to provide additional development options for Parcel 6 including residential and hotel units, and extend the buildout date of the entire DRI to December 31, 2003. The Park Place DRI is built out with the exception of this parcel and the developers have fulfilled the development order as amended. The amendment also proposes to reduce the approved DRI square footage to reflect existing and planned proposed uses. The current approved land use square footage is as follows: Retail/Commercial - 150,000; Office - 635,680; Light Industrial - 200,000; and Multifamily - 390 dwelling units. Parcel 6 is currently planned with 100,000 square feet of office. The applicant has not resolved all outstanding issues with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council concerning the traffic impact analysis. However, the applicant has submitted additional information and may have all issues resolved by the December 12, 2000 Community Development Board meeting. 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City's Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: 2.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. 2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. 3.2.2 Policy - Commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of "strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major intersections. 5. 1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified Park Place DRI 2000 i 0 consistent with provisions of the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 5.5 Objective - All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. The proposed change will not require a Future Land Use Plan amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The Park Place DRI is a mixed use project with 985,680 square feet of approved uses and 390 dwelling units. This proposed amendment will decrease the overall approved uses of the DRI by 302,921 square feet (31%) of the total potential development. The reduction of potential uses will decrease of the need for services such as potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste. However, the potential addition of residential units could impact the level of service of recreation facilities. These additional units may be subject to recreation/open space impact fees. The traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been reviewed by various agencies. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has identified issues with the traffic analysis, thus City staff has been unable to determine if the current level-of-service will be degraded. These issues are discussed later in this staff report. Due to the outstanding issues, it is not possible, as of this writing, to determine the consistency of the proposed DRI amendment with all applicable policies in the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The Future Land Use Map is not being amended, thus, there are not any applicable regulations from the Countywide Plan. III. CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) has determined that these proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes. A substantial deviation is defined by the Statutes as "any proposed change to a previously approved development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency." Several issues need to be clarified to the satisfaction of TBRPC before it can be determined if sufficient information has been supplied to rebut the presumption. These include: Intersection Analyses, Truck Factor TBRPC has an issue with the truck factor of two percent used in the intersection analyses. This factor is a percentage of trucks over six wheels on the roadways. Park Place DRI 2000 4 0 0 2. DRI Project Traffic as a percent of Intersection Capacity TBRPC has an issue with the calculation of the percentage of project traffic to the intersection capacity for the signalized movements. 3. Project Trip Distribution TBRPC has an issue with the basis of the project trip distribution primarily pertaining to mid-block dissipation of project traffic. 4. Project Transportation Impact Mitigation TBRPC requested additional information regarding transportation improvements required by the Development Order, the status of improvements, the developer's proportionate share and proportionate share payments made to date. The applicant has submitted a rebuttal to TBRPC. However, without these issues being resolved, the proposed DRI amendment currently is not consistent with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's recommendations. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The State's Comprehensive Plan policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: (16)(b)3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of living, working, shopping, and recreational activities. (18)(b)1. Provide incentives for developing land in a way that maximizes the uses of existing public facilities. (25)(b)5. Ensure that the transportation system provides maximum access to jobs and markets. The proposed DRI amendment is consistent with all applicable State Comprehensive Plan policies. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the outstanding issues related to traffic, the Planning Department cannot at this writing make a determination of consistency. Therefore, the Planning Department recommends CONTINUING this application pending the resolution of the outstanding issues with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. Park Place DRI 2000 0 Submitted by: Gary Jones, Senior Planner Attachments: Applicant's Submittal to DCA DCA Letter FDOT Letter TBRPC Letter Applicant's Responses Location Map Park Place DRI Parcel Configuration • Park Place DRI 2000 U ' Q Q Y D: Q a GULF TO BAY BLVD PREPARED BY: P.W.A. E.A. NORTH Location Map Park Place D" (O ?9 /-?-V qY U m LL 3 p o Z PPLE^WOOD 0 0 3 LEMDNW00D p2 PAR-?- o a Abbey O o C? ?O K TRAIL AP K KOVE DR _ 4 GLEN OAK O a VISTA ?DR r5+ VARSITY DR yi W p W ? p,yp p ° DD CAKE \? ,..? Ter,- View Lo. GRAND MEW ? o OR m NA AVE RC FAIRW PL 00 BRIGADOON DR MERRILL AVE 0j 0 NA LA m HOYT AVE PL O(; /7 RA N o o° a 4 DREW ST DRI DREW ST ; SITE o r Kw00D Cambrid9a Cir. Lo CHESAPEAKE ST Cleveland St. o 2 OD DR u LJ Cherry n. E NASH a a ST <? WHITMAN ST w 'h ¢P? coy ?. e a ?e a a ?? W VIRGINIA AVE 5 >O mKENTUaKY ,p o ? i rs CHAUCER ST j ? Z S o a p TENNES E ti ?3 o u W SHELLEY ST a a a H w Coro"" a??a m U{ (OT L/ o a a > m S.R. 60 < O GULF TO SAY BLVD m Z ?? G 3 z ?f C R- ? ,1 9`?n ?? MPF P DRUID RD a O Y w S P ti? O V O Z p O? SEVILLE BLV y RD ¢ m V a z D EARCE DR V a a 00 u BURNICE DR a a a a Qa a p W TROPICHiLLS DR ?? D ? ? z z z u 3 u a N L?? (-1 ?( _ R" 2F f f pR m "eJN , Fry 7 C? MoRELAND DR drum... SEA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION '-MATER F' ?p rrrrN' ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Environmental Engineering Land Planning Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping Construction Management GIS Mapping 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 Phone 813 880 8881 Fax 813 880 8882 www.kingengineering.com December 13, 2001 Vv=a 10 r lad ^? ajes': Mr. Ralph Stone City of Clearwater Central Permitting Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: Park Place DRI Annual Report Dear Ralph: In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 380.06(18), F.S., and the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order for the Park Place DRI, enclosed are three (3) copies of the Annual Report for the year ending September 1, 2001 and any applicable review fees. A copy of this report is being concurrently submitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs and Southwest Florida Water Management District. ' Sincerely, Chris Papandreas, AICP Senior Planner/Project Manager CP/mgv/jab Enclosure cc: Larry Gelb, Bausch & Lomb Surgical John Meyer, DRI Coordinator, TBRPC, w/encl. J. Thomas Beck, Chief, Bureau of State Planning, DCA, w/encl. Mark Phelps, SWFWMD, w/encl.- Project File 41255-012-000 O:Adm in\2 00 1 \Proj ect\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone01CP PRLLIMiNARY PARK PLACE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 2001 December 2001 PREPARED FOR: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 PREPARED BY: M .'-= ATE& iNG -arial Highway rial Center, Suite 300 .??.?. -lorida 33634 O:Admin\2001 TrojecA 1255-012-000/Letters/stone01 CP TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT ...................................... 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - PARK PLACE OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT F - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS M "LIVIA" O:Admin\200I Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0ICP 1. INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via DRI Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91, 5722-95 and 6107-96) and Chapter 380.06 (18) F.S., and in conformance with Form RPM-BSP Annual Report-1. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Council (TBRC), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 9/1/2000 to 9/1/2001 Month/DayNear Month/DayNear Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Name of DRI Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer - Name: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL Company Name Address: 21 Park Place Boulevard North Street Location Clearwater. FL 34606 City, State, Zip Code 1. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. EXHIBIT A SHOULD ALSO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS IF APPLICABLE: A. DESCRIBE CHANGES IN THE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR PHASING FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AND FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS; B. STATE ANY KNOWN INCREMENTAL DRI APPLICATIONS FOR O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/L.etters/stone0l CP DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OR REQUESTS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION THAT WERE FILED IN THE REPORTING YEAR AND TO BE FILED DURING THE NEXT YEAR; C. ATTACH A COPY OF ANY NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER OR THE SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF AN ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT WAS RECORDED BY THE DEVELOPER PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 380.06 (15) (F), F.S. No changes occurred to the currently approved plan of development during this reporting year. EXHIBIT A of this report contains a summary of Development Order changes for the project. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. No change in local jurisdiction occurred during this reporting year. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. During the reporting year no change has occurred to The Amended Master Development Site Plan (MAP H) included in this report as EXHIBIT B. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. Please see EXHIBIT C of this report. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF -SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS O:Admin\2001 \Proj a ct\ 125 5-012-000/Letters/stone01 CP SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. To the best of our knowledge, no tract Ownership has been transferred or changed. See Exhibit D for complete property ownership information. 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. To the.best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. Please see EXHIBIT E, PERMIT INFORMATION, for a summary list of permit and approval information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. A list summarizing each Development Order condition and the developer's compliance with each condition is attached as EXHIBIT F, COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued on February 2001 on the 85,000sf office building located on Parcel 8. This certificate has since expired and requires compliance to conditions. Other than that, we have no specific knowledge of additional plans being prepared or which may be submitted during the forthcoming reporting year for the remaining undeveloped portion of the DRI. and: a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits .... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report. There are no plans for additional development on the site at the present time. and: a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year. No trade-off mechanisms were used by Park Place developers during this reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Council, the State Department of Community Affairs and the Southwest Florida Water Management District on December 13, 2001. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have been sent a copy of this report. Person completing the questionnaire: Chris Papandreas. AICP Title: Senior Planner/Project Manager King Engineering Associates, Inc. Representing: Bausch & Lomb Surgical O:Admin\200ITroject\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP III. EXHIBITS Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Summary of Development Order Changes Revised Map H, Master Development Plan Summary of Development Activity Park Place DRI Ownership Permit Information Compliance With Development Order Conditions O:Admin\2001 \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP i EXHIBIT A Summary of Development Order Changes O:Admin\200ITrojecA1255-012-000/Letters/stoneOI CP EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 99.1 acres of commercial and office development with 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail uses. To annex the project into the City, the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance No. 3287-83. Ordinance No. 5142-91 subsequently amended the Development Order and Conceptual Plan to provide 200,000sf of industrial use, a maximum floor area ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change to the project phasing, extension of build-out date and a change in the timing of payment for transportation costs. Ordinance 5722-95 further amended the Order by changing development phasing to one phase, decreasing office space, extending the build-out date to the year 2000, and adding a conversion factor to allow for multi-family residential development along with the conversion of either office or industrial to multi-family. The latest amendments to the Park Place development order were approved by the City as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, 1996. This amendment provided the land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. The current project components are as follows: Existing Approved / Under Construction Proposed Maximum Retail Commercial 82,020 150,000 Office 389,028 795,520 Industrial 100,000 200,000 Residential 390 510 Please see EXHIBIT B of this Annual Report for the adopted MAP H, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. O:Admin\200I\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stoneOI CP EXHIBIT B Revised Map H Master Development Plan O:Admin\2001 \Proj ect\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0I CP c EXHIBIT C Summary of Development Activity O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0I CP t? i? G 1 1 r r / r ?I 1 ! I, 1 I 1 1 1 H 0 1 C i v 1 Q 1 G 0 0 \1 Itan: 1 W l_ 10? 1 0 N 11 . 1 W 1 1 I 1 WWI MnTkw as v atalaar MyAmmwm ? ?q I t 1 PNOCAA,MA I I 1X 101G1a ;,yat A41at?i PAlmni .U6t? U ' MM. 19 I 'ROAD SgXwALK TE aiwu ra m a[ rw m an a acwaml aulwla amar ImaPmi as m sva?o r1a: LIAIA IPAR-e ?1 um mia mma uoacu.mlpml ? a ?aW w Q ? V 5 w ? VAM la . I MM, R •r+® dial m; rl a= N a7i910mIlam y tf tl. 2%ICf a Ulf wmw Vi 4?1 f. R wmn naR MR N INUM an a am art 0a{ m46 ARrli Qa®aa N w N aai nN AND or lAi N i•a Y. so air ri w lwaa W WON 7 ton wlao ? a i?IM01 mane N N w a?arM s Mlflgl W N M .Mff 44 N as mm Maama?awat N aP am ' am 'am?aMiartriama w p4aa N WJia 1l. um Mali al4 Rt1141Raa/aam N. AMn Mt a 8M= N N iUiia am ainl am =a Nn sPmmo tla.pam m4 amialaormmm w N ? N W • IP laia ¦i'r1m mia mamm .w am N rmi *WX K 020 a U N W -Cum mane Ja D1m ,um AM mm N aM1m a. Wimp u V. N I L I I I I I li I I II I II II II I I II 1 I f I I I I I I I I i I I 1 II II ? 1 1 II II I I I QaJ .. I ? I S p 0 I I I I rnm 3 STMYY 'M®IP Mai noI IInJ I / SMAX uK ? MOW nami f algy I.' rQL s.r w Q:Armi. W-M Mxx . umm 7---------- . ?a a I I ' % ?? t d. Tn1w.N r.__-._P C y.. I I 1 s'1 I "°°-l ? 1 1 1 I I I a I WIYIf Mafl711/A ( <1F WNQmI- ww 11ae I NQI I ?1. a"?1. a ? rr.•1. 9PAO =AL au -? -M .Ram LAM Z Frrr.r.rr Y•rrr F r? Iq 4w1 M r •r+r•r Tqw rrrraly rwir ?ar?`a ><r V.w rl rY?r ?rarYrY!riIKY rlPwrwrr rrr 411?r•. 1i1^"?"?^i rrrar w.rr1rrrw rlruur•F11Y ?YY=r:r?rrw¦ er rrrur•rrrry IaYYrw1?Y•r ww wrrlarV Y•wr r•1r•. •rw wa•YFr1 Mr ?+w rF. •w.lrrw •+r. ?r r • w rr.. w wq na %1i17ry„rrr• y ""?i°.ww :a°?Fi r"F"•• •• r.ou?r°S.'..nrr " Yom"' ?.:?a?: w?i .?v r?:rtajr r..r?:?r4win.rl 1.'-iarrrr rr+rrrarwrr wFrr.Prrrrr :. F.rrw rrrFr,+rr rrrwrrr r1 r Mir r a r41• r Yraa rrrw Yl rw 1a.r ee•ao.rw... rF1r. r r.r?•rrrr rw.?w+.w ?r w'r rr r.rrwr rr. rrw ••F r.•? •.Yy ?NrYlMm?w r wwrY rlrla4 r\ Rrr alNrlq IA lOfOl FllrrrrFV •Frt/M Y1-i rr'?`rw.a.: r: Nr ar r11 ivlrN Pa N M+i ti rr.r.rrr rrrF+rrr?r1!?Pi/f1?Y?rli .wrr w?. ?'+•.r'?r1i?""liA+q wr 11 r1rF••1r - ?rrrwl.r rwrllw a a'.w aaarK.rYrrao atri.l?,rr ??l •rFiilrr •?r w??mr vaa? r Yr1a W rr•r-rr _?rM r•11w aor'w Re.rs Mira ?? i.ra•+w rr`W II ?- u w a• rNrw I M rrrw I I U ? i ton ri ' . - STOP IAND PAfil1? au ' sma ?o?aatiri irri?MO°11ou'rna KING E/ 01MEr" R®NG Asir®cIA7E* S INC. PARK PLACE - U.S. 19 PARCEL Engineers • Planners • Surveyors. Scientist 'landscape Architects @pp 2a"/ ar, a K .r ' Ft. 34923 lam **0 i rr„ lap M iurtll.•11• AP.. aaY S.. 2 s+M A-21 .2 EXHIBIT B-1 P- z ? 0a.. M IWI i71 wa iwaa IWI 2u.a. ;,„ 844-0";la? FINAL SITE PLAN 4 LA Maly un 1 l1i EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY During the 200/01 reporting year, no construction was initiated. O:Admin\200I \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT D Park Place DRI Ownership O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Lctters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT D PARK PLACE DRI OWNERSHIP Parcel Parcel No. Property Owner 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P. 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 474 S. Northlake Boulevard Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche 3225 Aviation Avenue #700 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 Stacy Glenborough 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 400 South El Camino Rio 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 San Mateo California 94402 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 Highwoods Properties Holdings 3111 W. Martin Luther King Boulevard #300 Tampa, Florida 33601 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 Alex-Arl Florida Company 901 Venetian Bay Blvd. Venice, FL 34292 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010 Clant, Inc. 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020 P.O. Box 916464 11C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030 Longwood, FL 37291 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 O:Admin\2001\Project\ 1255-012-000/Leners/stone0l CP EXHIBIT E Permit Information O:Admin\2001 Troject\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0I CF EXHIBIT E PERMIT INFORMATION List of Development Approvals and Permits For Reporting Year Ending September 1, 2001 Approval/Permit Agency Status/Approval Date PARCEL 1 City of Clearwater August 2001 Modification of Existing Wastewater Manhole as Instructed by the City of Clearwater, in order to allow for sampling point to be installed PARCEL 1 Proposed State Highway access connection State of Florida Department of Transportation April 2001 O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP a EXHIBIT F Compliance With Development Order Conditions O:Admin\200I \Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stoneOI CP EXHIBIT F COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments., as contained in the Park Place DRI Development Order (amended 11/221/96) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: Conditions & Commitments Compliance SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and final Site Plans submitted for each phase and consistent with DRI "Conceptual Plan". All development activity must receive the appropriate City approval, consistent with the "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved vis Ordinance No. 6107-96. AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. Developer has complied. B. Al development shall-be -consistent with? (All development 66tivity is reviewed and-approved? applicable land development codes. by-the City-of_Clearwater at'time of plan: approval. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated to the City of Clearwater. Developer has complied. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. constructed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 sf 4795;520sf,-;office --use, 150,000sf retail, 200,000sf industrial) subject to conversion factors. CC. Mass transit requirements. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to the first Final Site Plan approval after 1/19/95. Park Place Blvd. Constructed and accepted by City. Conversion factor utilized to allow 390 multifamily units. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. (Bus stop on Park Place Blvd. was constructed as part of apartment project) Access previously acquired. All developer commitments have been met. O:Admin\2001 \Proj ect\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP r Conditions & Commitments Compliance EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City 10' easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. Developer has complied. F. -Deleted via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. Curb cut and median turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting year. I. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. (Approved Grand Reserve Site Plan maintains aquatic lands) Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the SWFWMD have been issued permits for all land project drainage system. development activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. The individual contractors are being held responsible for compliance with permit conditions. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as needed. 0. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. O:Admin\2001 \Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP Conditions & Commitments Compliance Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required Proposed development complies by connecting Hampton Road to Park Place Blvd. To existing Drew St. and US 19 shopping with sidewalks. R. S T U V W X. Y Z. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. Maintenance of on-site wells. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Osprey nest has been relocated successfully and occupied by osprey. Developer has complied; a capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Well on Parcel 2 required rerouting to provide fresh water. Original well was drilled too deep. SWFWMD permit was issued and well repaired accordingly. N/A (City requirement) Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvement costs in accordance with the applicable revised Development Order conditions. O:Admin\2001 \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP PARK PLACE (DRI NO. 92) CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 1995 March, 1996 PREPARED FOR: AMERICAN CYANAMID One Cyanamid Plaza Wayne, NJ 07470 PREPARED BY: KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 24945 U.S. 19 North Clearwater, FL 34623 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 H. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT .............................. 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ............................................. 5-24 EXHIBIT A - CHANGES - PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A-1 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE (NO. 5142-91) APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A-2 CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT D-1 - PARK PLACE BLVD. DEDICATION EXHIBIT E - NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS (PPDR19295) i 1 (P.eRM95) L INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983, amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91 and 5722-95) on December 19, 1991 and January 19, 1995, respectfully, and Chapter 380.06(18) F.S. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning & Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 911/94 to 9/1195 Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Location: Clearwater. Pinellas City County Developer: Name: American Cyanamid Company Name Address: One Cyanamid Plaza 07470 Street Location Wayne. NJ 07470 City, State, Zip Code DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR, DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL NOTE ANY ACTIONS (SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATIONS) TAKEN BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS THESE CHANGES. The proposed plan of development for the Park Place DRI is specifically discussed in Exhibit A. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEX- ING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED ANEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Park Place was annexed by the City of Clearwater shortly after initial Development Order approval by Pinellas County. On October 20, 1983, the Development Order was amended and reissued for the project by the City of Clearwater. No other changes in local jurisdiction have occurred. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCRE- MENTAL SITE PLANS, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. The Amended Master Development Plan approved via Ordinance No. 5722- 95 (DRI Development Order Amendment) is included with this report as Exhibit A-2 and shows the current proposed plan of development. All other plans previously submitted and not superseded by the 1995 Amendment remain in effect. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVI- TY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORT- ING YEAR, AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOP- MENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. Please see Exhibit C for a summary comparison of development activity proposed and conducted. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOP- MENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTI'T'Y OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. Exhibit D describes ownership within the Park Place project. 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE, SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. 2 ' To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the 1 Park Place project or by the previous developer. 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. See Exhibit F for a list of permit and approval information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT, AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA, AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR CONflbIITMENT HAS BEE COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. u Attached as Exhibit G. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: "a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted..... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report" and: "a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits..... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report" and: "a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year" Development activities proposed in the previous Annual Report included the completion of the Storz Ophthalmics light industrial building which occurred November 1992. (PPDRI92-05) 3 ' During the reporting year 9/93 - 9/94, the outparcels along SR-60 were developed and construction completed for two restaurants. Construction is on-going for a drive-thru restaurant scheduled to open in early 1996. To the best of our knowledge, at the present time there are no specific development plans for the coming year for the Park Place DRI. To the best of our knowledge, no specific development approvals and permits are planned to be submitted during the year immediately following 1 this Annual Report. In reference to trade-off mechanisms, no use of the established conversion ' factors were utilized during this reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN i CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs, and Southwest Florida Water Management District ' on March 29, 1996. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have been sent a copy of the report. 1 t Person completing the questionnaire: Richard K. Dutter, AICP Title: Director of Planning King Engineering Associates, Inc. Representing: American Cyanamid 4 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 (PPDRM 95) III. EXPIIBTI'S EXHIBIT A - CHANGES IN PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A-1 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A-2 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT D-1 - PARK PLACE BLVD. DEDICATION EXHIBIT E - NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS 5 EXHIBIT A CHANGES - PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT Exhibit A-1 is a copy of the City of Clearwater Ordinance No. 5142-91 (adopted 12/19/91), approving the DRI Development Order Amendment request and determining that the Amendment did not constitute a "Substantial Deviation" from the prior approved Development Order. On August 29, 1994, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. and Building Operation Holding Company, owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Park Place DRI, filed a "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI" with the City of Clearwater, TBRPC, and DCA. Exhibit A-2 is a copy of the rendered, certified Development Order Amendment, deemed to be a non-substantial deviation ' and adopted by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 5722-95 on January 19, 1995. In summary, this amendment to the Development Order: 1. Modified the phasing to one (1) phase with no subphases; 2. Decreased office development by 7,480 square feet; 3. Clarified development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the development; 1 4. Extended build-out date by four (4) years (a cumulative extension of 9 years); 5. Added conversion factors for the conversion of certain office development to multi-family, and for industrial to either office or multi-family development; 6. Deleted or modified conditions to reflect changes in transportation network; and 7. Restated remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer. t t (PPDRM95) 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i (PPDR6295) EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF C EARWATER ORDINANCE NO 5142-91 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT 7 ,12/10193 16:10 'a 1__. I *. ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91 Z002/012 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL ' IMPACT; AMENDING ORDINANCE 3205-83, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR PARK PLACE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 3287-83; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT;- DETERMINING THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE NOT A "SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION" FROM THE ' APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER; DETERMINING THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 3205- 83 (the "Development Order"), which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described ' on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 3287- 83, an amendment to the Development Order, and readopted Ordinance 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and ' WHEREAS, on August 19, 1991, Building Operation Holding Company, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of Park Place, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"), pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (the ' "NOPC"), proposing to (i) amend the Conceptual Plan for Park Place to provide for 200,000 square feet of floor area for industrial use and a reduction of the approved floor area for office use by 300,000 square feet; (ii) provide a maximum floor area ratio ("F.A.R.") for industrial use; (iii) amend the phasing of the development; (iv) amend all Development Order conditions based on phasing; (v) change the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of road improvement costs; and (vi) extend the build-out date by five (5) years; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 5114- 91, rezoning a portion of the property from "General Office" to "Research, Development and Office Park," and Ordinance 5113-91, amending the land use plan designation for the same portion of the property from "Residential/ Office" to "Industrial," consistent with the proposed revised Conceptual Plan for Park Place; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government ' having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider amendments to DRI's; and ' WHEREAS, the City Commission has revised the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public; now, therefore, ,-. / / --.1 /' 1 12/10/93 18:11 $ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: e Z003/012 Section 1. Introduction. This ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings. The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance 3205-83, and amended by Ordinance 3287-83, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3161(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Building Operating Holding Company has proposed the following amendments to the Park Place Development Order: 1. Revising the Conceptual Plan for Park Place to provide for 200,000 square feet of floor area for industrial use and a reduction of the approved floor area for office use by 300,000 square feet to 803,000 square feet; 2. Adding a condition that the maximum F.A.R. for industrial use is 0.4; 3. Amending the phasing of the development; 4. Amending all Development Order conditions based on phasing;- 5. Changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements which would have been paid concurrently with Phases II and III to a date 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance; 6. Eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and 7. Extending the build-out date by five (5) years. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC") and the Department of Community Affairs, State of Florida ("DCA"). D. The proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Amended Application for Development Approval. 2 a e 0 12/10/93 16:12 2004/012 E. The City Commission has adopted Ordinance 5113-91, amending the land use plan designation, and Ordinance 5114-91, rezoning a portion of the property consistent with the revised Conceptual Plan. Section 3. Conclusions of Law. The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: ' A. Development in accordance with the proposed amendments, including the revised Conceptual Plan, will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. B. The proposed amendments are consistent with the land development regulations and the comprehensive plan of the City. ' C. The proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact, or any type of regional ' impact not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, over those treated under the Development Order. The proposed amendments, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Park Place Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. ' D. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. E. The amendments are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance 4983- 90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. ' l b aw le F. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applica and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City and Building Operation Holding Company are authorized to approved/conduct development as described herein. G. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. ' Section 4. Order. Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that t'he Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4(A) and 4(J) of the Development Order is amended as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the ' Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." ' B. Section 4(C) of the Development Order is amended to provide that the Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,153,000 square feet, 12/10/93 16:13 $ ® 005/012 comprised of a maximum 803,000 square feet of office use, a maximum, 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use and a maximum 200,000 square' feet of industrial use. C. Section 4(C)(1) of the Development Order is amended to provide that industrial use shall have a maximum F.A.R. of 0.4. 0. Section 4(C)(2) of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: The Project shall consist of one phase as follows: Phase Maximum Floor Area In Suuare Feet Retail a Commercial- Office Industrial Total Phase A 150,000 803,000 200,000 1,153,000 Phase A shall be divided into three subphases as follows: Subphase Maximum Floor Area In Souare Feet Retail Commercial Offi ce Industrial Total_ Al A2 150,000* 480,000** 200,000 830,000 A3 198,000 198,000 125,000 125,000 Total 150,000 803,000 200,000 1,153,000 *Includes 55,278 square feet existing as of 12-19-91. ."Includes 120,560 square feet existing as of 12-19-91. (il E. Section 4.0. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: The Developer agrees to acquire land, or to pay the City for land required to be acquired by the City, to provide ingress and egress to the west of the Project. Specifically, access to the west shall interconnect with the existing easement at the north end of M & B 19-1, 20, 20-1 and 20-1A (Bennigan's, Chi Chi's and Perkins) to the U.S. 19 frontage road and through the Bennigan's site to the existing traffic light at State Road 60. ec-es- -h,„ he 4d ,, Said ingress and egress shall be secured by fee simple acquisition, right-of-way easement, or other appropriate mechanism by either the Developer or the City. 4 A4 4 i f = 12/10/93 11 16:13 [a 006/012 _ a i,oi-thi y.-O& -, i2) menths after- e-e€geet4ye--date of this Orderi eb t-a e d. In - th-cam e n t that t-he-City -se ex er-ea e- 4-s--power e f e'misAn+ drt te-asqu-i-re-rights_ 4P --any -4 the -alpeye ref-ererieea constructing such connection to the adjoining property to the west, ' in addition to any other contributions for on-site or off-site road improvements, will be the responsibility of the Developer according to a schedule to be established with the preliminary site plan ' approval of Subphase Al Phase 1. f This access has been acquired and constructed.] 1 1 F. Section 4.E. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subphase Al Phase funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improvements. [Substantial revision; see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] 1. At the U.S. 19/Drew Street intersection construct a grade-separated interchange. This improvement has been committed to in the current 'Florida Department of Transportation Adopted Five-Year Work Program and is scheduled for Fiscal Year '95/'96. In lieu of the funding commitment or the proportionate share of the construction cost, the following commitments may be made: a. Extend Druid Road between Belcher Road and Edenville Road. The completion of this improvement will provide a parallel reliever access for State Road 60 and Drew Street. [This improvement has been completed.] b. Extend and widen Drew Street as a four-lane divided link (four through lanes and turn lanes as are appropriate) between U.S. 19 and McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement has been completed.] 1Z/1n/e? 1H:14 V .. 4007/012 I FR TT? ,' c. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy after the development generates 525 p.m. peak hour net external vehicle trips, the Developer shall provide up to $125,000 to the Florida Department of Transportation for the construction plans of the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated interchange. [As of 12-19-91, the development generates 296 p.m. peak hour net external vehicle trips.] These funds shall be provided in order to obtain a commitment for the construction of the U.S. 19/Drew street grade-separated interchange during Subphase A2. 2. Construct access points to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 3. At the S.R. 60/Clearwater Mall Drive II intersection construct two eastbound to northbound exclusive left turn lanes. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 4. Install or renovate, as appropriate, traffic signals at the south project entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 5. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersection with Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements are under construction.] , 6. Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U.S. 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement is under construction.] 7. At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an additional through lane and additional exclusive left and right turn lanes on all approaches. The through lanes shall be continued to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improvements. E_" 3 8. At the U.S. 19/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an eastbound to south bound exclusive right turn lane and in the ' westbound, direction construct one additional exclusive left turn lane. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay, its proportionate share of the cost for construction of this improvement. 9. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane divided arterial from U.S. 19 to N.E. Coachman Road, and add turn lanes at all signalized intersections in between. This improvement is committed to in the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program as being constructed in Fiscal Year 1992-93. G. Section 4.F, of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan-for Subphase A2 Pha se 11, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its - proportionate share of the construction of the transportation improvements: [Substantial revision: see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] At the U.S. 19/N.E. Coachman Road (S.R. 590) intersection i construct a grade separated interchange, provided, however, such facility shall not remain a condition of approval if TBRPC's transportation policies are amended or the Developer, at the initiation of Subphase A2, agrees to prepare and submit traffic condition information documenting that the improvements are no ' longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. H. Section 4.G. of the-Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subphase A3 Phase !I!, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improvements. [Substantial revision: see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] ' 1 Co t t dditi l a k Pl H t P . ns ruc ace on amp on a ona ccess to ar Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole ' responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the 7 a-/ L/ Z 9 12/10/93 16:16 $ ® 009/012 City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. These improvements are to be made in phases as is appropriate, but in their entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements are completed except for Drew Street and the north project entrance, and Drew Street and Hampton Road.] 3. Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane divided link- (two through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of this improvement shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. This improvement is scheduled by the City of Clearwater for its 192/193 Fiscal Year. 4. At the U.S. 19/Sunset Point Road intersection construct a grade separated interchange, provided, however, such facility shall not remain a condition of approval if TBRPC's transportation policies are amended or the Developer, at the initiation of Subphase A3 agrees to prepare and submit traffic condition information documenting that the improvements are no longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. I. Not later than 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance, Developer shall pay to the City the sum of $383,393.00, together with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from December 8, 1983. This payment, together with the previous transportation mitigation payment made pursuant to the Development Order, is in full satisfaction of Developer's obligations under Sections 4.E.2 through 4.E.5, 4.E.7, 4.E.8, 4.G.1 through 4.G.3, and 4.Z of the Development Order as amended by this ordinance: J. The build-out year is hereby extended by five (5) years through 1996. This results in an extension of the build-out-of Phase I by 11 years, from 1985 to 1996; an extension of the build-out of Phase II by 8 years, from 1988 to 1996; and an extension of the build-out of Phase III by 5 years, from 1991 to 1996. K. Section 4.1. is hereby repealed. L. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. 4 U 8 ' 12/10/93 16:17 010/012 M. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or.the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are ' limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. ' N. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days following the effective date hereof, to Building Operating Holding Company, OCA and TBRPC. r 0. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the Department of Community Affairs and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. P. Notice of adoption of. this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 45 days after copies have been transmitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING November 4, 1991 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED AS AMENDED Attest: J Cynt Go au City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Ga bract , J . City Attorney 9 Mayor-Commissioner a? n"4" :I Edeby calf th roes true?+yid cOS ?t We ?uiuY is it- _ -&PPft" m LbSLC UY of 7MmteE Wkness-my hind 3jXr vf{tckj seal okthe c ty of cl;r2 U '%Zw• December 19, 1991 I t i 1 1 I LEGEND I I z OFFICE- 803.000sf I I COMMERCIAL 150,000sf I INDUSTRIAL 200,000sf I I I PROPOSED ACCESS j (EXACT LOCATION OF ENTRANCESIEXITS TO BE DETERMINED DURING FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL) j I I I wa c---.-.-----------------------? I I ? i I i I I XIS TAIL SR 60 NOTES: 1O MAXIMUM OF 2 OUTPARCELS 02 MAXIMUM OF 3 OUTPARCELS © ACCESS FROM SR 90 SUBJECT TO FOOT APPROVAL -------------------- JP i ?v."ZA-\ I 1 ' F M 1 % j ETAIL)I f 3 j ------ -._ .1A GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVA f=LF==? a 1 "12S• 250' 500' [PAR % PLACE It" EngWeefno Assoclal.s• kw' AMENDED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 'B' . EX Mrr A-2 CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 ' APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT t 8 i 1 f 1 ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83 AND ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO CHANGE THE PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT, DECREASE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, CLARIFY THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS ALLOCATED TO EACH PARCEL OF THE DEVELOPMENT, EXTEND THE BUILD- OUT DATE, ADD A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR OFFICE,. INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, REVISE CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONCERNING TRANSPORTA- TION MITIGATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND RESTATE ALL REMAINING TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEVELOPER, INCLUDING THE OBLIGATION TO DEDICATE AND CONSTRUCT PARK PLACE BOULEVARD; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF tHIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development -of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order, and WHEREAS, on August 29, 1994, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., and Building Operation Holding Company, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City'), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ('TBRPC') and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) amend the phasing of the development from one phase with three subphases to one phase with no subphases; (ii) decrease office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarify the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extend the build-out date by four (4) years; (v) add a conversion factor for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi- family residential development; (vi) amend certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affecte(f by the Development; (vii) restate all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) amend certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC (collectively, the 'Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, the ownership of the Development is as shown on Exhibit 'B' attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit 'B* attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, and presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant - to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and M 2 ? -7 l ?I 1! t 1 1 WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83 and No. 5142-91, , is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., and Building Operation Holding Company, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B,° have proposed the following amendments to the Development Order. 1. Modifying the phasing of the development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; and 2. Decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; and 3. Clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; and . 4. Extending the build-out date by four .(4?...years, a cumulative extension of-nine (9) years; and 5. Adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; and 6. Deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; and 3 7. Restating all remaining transportation the Developer, including the obligation Park Place Boulevard; and improvement obligations of to dedicate and construct 8. Modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law. A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. r B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit 'C,' will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan-applicable to-the area, - - C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt 8 e N Q 4 11 1 1 from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DR[ remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted" pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Building Operation Holding Company and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended as shown on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C." V B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project-is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,145,520 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795,520 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factor set forth in Subsection Q. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. C. Section 4.C.1. of the Development Order is amended to add the following sentence: No FAR is applicable to multi-family residential use. 5 1 N 0. Section 4.C.2. of the Development Order is amended to read: The Project shall consist of one phase as follows: Maximum Floor Area in Square Feet Completion Year RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TOTAL 150, 000' 795,520** 200,000' 1,145, 520 2000 'Includes 55.278 square feet existing as of 811/94. "Includes 120,560 square feet existing as of 8/1/94. "'Includes 100,000 square feet existing as of 8/1/94. The above development is allocated among the parcels described on Exhibit "B' attached hereto and incorporated herein as follows: • -The-owner of a parcel to which development rights are allocated may assign all or part of those development rights to another parcel or parcels so long as the land use designation of the parcel to which the assignment is made permits development of the rights assigned. E. Section 4.E. of the Development Order is amended to read: Prior to the approval of the frstip+ti,ai final site plan for the Development after the effective date of this Ordinance-. , fundinA -4 I g commitments for construction from the govemmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial 0 e 6 MAYIMtIM Fi nno Aorw 111 c......._ r-___ r E r 1 responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improvements. . . a 1_2. Construct access points to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall . be the sole responsibility of the Developer. - Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paid_s4a4-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 23. pa.y4he total seined.,} 4. Install or renovate, as appropriate, traffic signals at the south project entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has aids4a44-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 3_6. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersection with Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has aidsha,44-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. (These improvements have been completed .J 46. Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U.S. 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement has been completed+s URdeF •] At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an-additional eastbound and westbound through lanes and additional exclusive left and-4944-tum lanes on all approaches, and an additional right turn lane on the northbound and southbound aporoaches. The through lanes shall be continued to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z, the Developer has paids4a44-pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improvements. B p ., 69. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane divided arterial from U.S. 19 to N.E. Coachman Road, and add turn lanes at all signalized intersections in between. A funding commitment has been made for Tthis improvement which is programmed for construct ionsaFFIFF14W to in the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program for fiscal year 1995/1996$g?, 8 ' F. Subsection 4.F. of the Development Order is hereby deleted. G. Subsection 4.G.1. is hereby deleted. H. Subsection 4.G.2. of the Development Order is amended to read: 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and ! Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. Sulam The cost of these improvements shall be 'the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has aideha4-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these ' improvements. [These improvements are completed-ex--.---€e Hamptw; Rea 1. Subsection 4.G.3 is amended to read as follows: 3. Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane divided link (two through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of this improvement shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has gidsha --_pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. A funding commitment has --been 1 made for Tthis improvement which is scheduled by the, City of Clearwater for its 1994/1995'3 Fiscal Year. I J. Subsection 4.G.4. is hereby deleted K The Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvements in accordance with revised Subsections 4.E.1 through 4.E.3, 4.E.5, 4.G.2., 4.G.3. and 42. of the Development Order. The only remaining obligation of the Developer concerning the transportation improvements is contained in Subsection 4.B.6. of the Development Order, as set forth in Section 4.N. of this Ordinance. L. The build-out year is hereby extended by a cumulative period of nine (9) years through 2000. 1 g M. 1 0 The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection n 4.A.A.: A.A. Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 2.44 units of multi-family residential development and/or 1,000 square feet of industrial development to convert to either (i) 633 square feet of office development or (ii) 1.54 units of multi-family residential development are hereby established for the office and industrial areas shown as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and/or 8 on Exhibit "B.' Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) multi-family residential development shall be permitted on Parcels 2, 3 and/or 8 only; (ii) reference to Parcel 2 herein specifically excludes the portion of Parcel 2 which is designated as "Preservation', and (iii) development shall be limited as follows; MINIMUM Industrial 100,000' Office 2EEI=40,560- Multi-family Residential 0» MAXIMUM 200,000* 858,820* 510" .square feet of floor area "units N. Thirty (30) days prior to is of any permit which utilizes the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notice, from the Developer, of the proposed use of the conversion ratio. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. B. B.: , 1 • The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit 'B' shall be dedicated to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any development permit for any portion of Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 shown on Exhibit "B,' but in no event later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. The City will cease to issue any and all building permits and development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 upon failure to comply with this Subsection 8.6.1. 2. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B' shall be completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: 10 (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 4 or 6 on Exhibit 'B or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6, or 7, upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.2. 3. The portions of Park Place Boulevard adjoining Parcels 1, 2 and 3 shown on Exhibit 'B" which have been dedicated shall be completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 2 or 3 shown on Exhibit 'B"; or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 1, 2, or 3 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.3. 0. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. C. C.: C.C. In order to facilitate mass transit service to the Park. Place development, the Developer will work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority ('PSTA") as follows: 1. PSTA is allowed to tun buses through the development in order to serve Park Place from both Drew Street and Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard. 2. The Developer grants permission to PSTA for the on-site installation of bus stops, benches, and shelters along the main roadway connecting Drew Street and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. r 3. The Developer shall endeavor to notify PSTA at least two (2) months in advance of build-out, in order for PSTA to revise the necessary routes and schedules, install bus stops, passenger benches, and passenger shelters. 1 P. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. D. D.: D.D. The City may not adjust the green time for State Road 60 at the Bennigan's driveway to account for Development traffic if such adjustment would result in an unacceptable level of service on State Road 60. Q. The following is added to Subsection 5.A. of the Development Order, as an additional item to be contained in the annual report: 6. A cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during the reporting year. R. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. S. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. T. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Storz Ophthalmics-, Inc., Building Operation Holding Company, DCA and TBRPC. U. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA, k V. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 45 days after copies have been transmitted to the Tarripa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida 12 Department of Community Affairs unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: , Cynt a'E, Gaudeau . . City Clerk t t ta Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A' -Legal Description Exhibit 'B" - Ownership Exhibit "C' - Revised Map H ##22230.01 d-11 3211291761 #0022230.01 January 5, 1995 Mayor - Commissioner I of drat thin is a tree and correct oopq of tie tie W it in the files of Cty of ' =Kr cep wft= my hand ArA offi ' seal of the CAV of CSeacwa?? T_hfsl?ay of 99?. De" V r 13 f-- January 19„1995 1 ` A EXHIBIT'A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 rya LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01' W. 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W. 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01004'04• E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49' W. 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04' E, thence N 22'47'58' E. 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27' E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49 E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28' E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest comer of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21' E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" .W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21• E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. M B F[111!11? EXHIBIT "B" to Ordinance No. 5722-95 PARK PLACE OWNERS 0-1 No Parcel I.D. No. 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 2 . 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 4 17-29-16-00000-230-1300 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 Owner Slorz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place'Bivd. N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Park Place Bldg. Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Park Place Building Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 r? E • w Q w a ., t a (m EM m m t t t> t t t t t arcel I. D ,-No. ner 0- 6 7 8 9 10 k 17-29-16-OOOOQ-240-0400 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 17-29-16-00000-230-0200 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 17-29-16-00000-230-1000 Park Place Building Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 . Park Place Bldg. Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Building Operation Holding Co. c% PNC Realty Holding Corp. One PNC Plaza, 181h Floor Fifth Avenue 8 Wood Street Pittsburg, PA 1222 MRL #C-1111 Ltd. Suite X215 2800 Routh Street Dallas, TX 75201 MDC Associates 81-A Ltd. c% Provident National Bank Attn: Marvin F. Poer & Co. 111 North Orhnge Avenue Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32801 1w w 0 N w a No Parcel I. D, No. Owner 11 17-29-16-00000-240-0500 MDC Associates 81-A Ltd, l C/o Provident National Bank t? Attn: Marvin F. Poer & Co. 111 North Orange Avenue suite 1000 Orlando, FL' 32801 0048845.01/mme r ?= G r 4 s 3 - h y S Kati; l • m PUZ=_3 e- . • ? e ?- o A= AIM MM= 4 PA= 2 443 A* o ?4 0 QAt ?..? . ?, ?_ . RAF= • • ,W Cis 4 PAFCM U S 2MA _ J BAF +•• Z45 A?W CL j ro sAr PAGE 4 OF 4• s7o?? - 4C • : arw 11Aa1 PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL, 200,000 SF '00 1100.000 Ef EXIET)1o) . IIACCEIE OFICE 268,F700 SF \ \ 11 I NATLRAL AREA OFFICE PARCEL a 124,860 SF PARCEL 4 OFFICE PARCEL t 171,400 SF -r zttz CO RERCIAL MET 4) ? ACi 125.000 F (ss,:n EP axis MICE (120,000 Ofw PICE PLANNED) It ?ARCEL T ? (120,000 Ef EXISTING) ?ARCEL t ?ARCEL E O ,SIG LJJ0001NERCIAL? I Comm "CIAL 10,000 SO, 10,000 F 11,000 EP PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 0 AnALI COIROTK'lAl 0!210 !f 04.128 M 1!0.000 L OffKt 120.!10 If 114.610 If 11361061 LT. Adp InAL 100.000 M 100.000 M 100.000 M ,OVAL 11!.011 if 116.418 If 146.010 If tiolfs: L INC 1011MO EO AapurT of tOUAAt f00TA6t 104 *aVxXAL LHXMOFID ?A11Ctl! AMC "Un 014 H KIT AVALAOLE M~ OoOM.u14" Alp AM( U"CT TO OW". THC AA101An Of TeTAL O KVINOPIMMMOWEVCR TLLL NOT tYCICO T11(• AHOLAfT Of OCYCLOPWAT APPAOVCD K THt O Demomw OWIL y b I. THAT PORTION of THC OCVCLOft4al THAT XUA04 TO K MM WO It P.MAACO 11, At THC ?LAW" ~ Z Ttl 0CV[MO umr. THC OLIO.ONf DATE /LM M PLAMEO AND MA T ?C bC i?? PROECI W 0[CCWCII 100. M 1. CONvtAIM AATtl Of 1,000 towAt JECT a to L49M MUFMAL "VCLOft"T TO 417 WMAt r9 T Of fet OtV[LO %qw. oA Looo 40utat rtn or oalfet DCVtuOrb"I r0 a44 tLt ll H z H . -IAW&T L"n. oM Joao 1o1..At Itn of L10ff Apl.41AUL Dtrnonofr TelAf ?uT>rnLlar LArTs A" O . "Mm C4TA1AiM1tD, ri 4. ANY ?AL"ANLT Arto"hAl. 0(Vft O?.iNr Ln 1 WILL Of L&IM 10 PAWL 9 1.1 A 1. N N 1 to J U 0uP•IOMr tOUtWAO COMMERCIAL (RETAL) I A'/NO ENGUEFR/Na AssocmTES, /NC, Planners, Enplneete, Surveyors PARK PLACE bRI - REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP ti ,..A -- ... ' Err B APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP 1 1 a.oxNz? 9 • : tww MAUI . • lAt? USE SCMf A i• PARCEL 1 Ut tYlirrlq f1AM,M 0T LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CcA*CUl '•'_• +r =/•===+r Iao.ooo 200,000 SF I Soo ?ARCEL t OFFICE It0.tt0 tr 614.160 t! =II.t10 W (100,000 ff [xlfTllOi gxxTNO lT. tNOY{TIYL 100.000 p 100.000 Sr =00.000 •t J ACCESS OFFICE '°IAL =1 =• w /61.616 M Y16.It0 t/ 258,700 SF I LIM" L THE Ito/0tt0 A,putT of 104.11E IooT", /00 '061DYAL L#dXMO?IO PAIICILS AAE 6AtE0 ON Ktv AVAL1elT NAMWT NOA4A1101 Alp AAt 1111t1W0 tu6A[CT TO L1"W. THE Amman or venal ACCttt HATIatAL "MOP604."MVEA WILL NOT 931CICS TW. ! AREA a9 'Ll"M Of O YOaL MT AI?AOVfo R JW y ` E. THAT PCRlwm oI THE OtVELO?wE111 T,tAT REluay 7 OFFICE ?ARC[L 3 10 K OEY[LOIED If AM11114E0 TO At THE ?LAW" 124,860 SF oEMOb"r. T)1[ fKaD-OUl PAU roe TW PARCEL 1 .1,f OFFICE KAIt(aO[MWWGa AM M T1W TOIAL ftQACT ?ARCEL 1 171,400 SF Is Occru 17000• 1. COWAAM N AATEt Or to" towAE IEn OF, ?r UC*a 0"TINAI "VIXWWM to U tOYUIt rr" or ICE "moftem. 0• tow 60tYK CO tvERCIAL ftcl ar a°Ifra oMLLPtul 10 EN ALr,/AYIT (R[T l Fu l ttffl, al to" tt INC MY Or LjafT OaAlft L 4 ACens P[ T?Tilto 1.6 t+1T1•rAMIT t1,1fl. AME 125,000 F (tt,211 1f axis t. AMT to WIAUCT AtfptMTIAL 0hftohg,,f ofrICE 1160,006 W KAN?EO) WILL It L44M 10 PAACTLI 1,4 ? t. 6t 11=6.660 1f ExISTIHal PARCEL 6 PARCEL T PARCEL 1 0 .?IGF I `_m t_.. PARCEL I 11C AL ColA1111ERCIAL (0,000 if 11,000 tf PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 ow•to w tloutwn COMMERCIAL (RETAL) 4-/Nd7 ENG/NEER/NG ASSOCU S, /NC Planners. Engineers, Surveyors PARK PLACE bRI - REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP N A1.?11 ?Onlr• a .•u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 67,819± SF of the approved 150,000 SF retail commercial exists. 120,560± SF of the approved 795,520 SF office space exists. 100,000± SF of the approved 200,000 SF industrial use exists. Development activity during the reporting year consisted of commercial construction on the outparcels fronting SR-60. (PPDRI9295) 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXMBIT D ORANGES IN OWNERSHIP In early 1995, CLANT, Inc. acquired ownership of the two (2) undeveloped outparcels fronting along SR-60. The graphic following this owner's list illustrates the current ownership of parcels within the Park Place Development. To the best of our knowledge, no other changes of ownership of undeveloped parcels occurred during this reporting year. Park Place Owners No. Parcel I.D. No. 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 ' 4 17-29-16-00000-230-1300 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 17-29-16-00000-230-0200 (PPDR19295) 19 Owner Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. North Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. North Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. North Clearwater, FL 34619 Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Park Place Bldg., Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Park Place Bldg., Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Building Operation Holding Co. c/o PNC Realty Holding Corp. One PNC Plaza, 18th Floor Fifth Avenue & Wood Street Pittsburgh, PA 15222 CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP (CONT'D) ' 9 10 ' 11 A t 1 (PPDRD295) 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 17-29-16-00000-230-1000 17-29-16-00000-240-0500 Park Place Blvd. 20 MRL #C-IIII Ltd. Suite X215 2800 Routh Street Dallas, TX 75201 CLANT, Inc. P. O. Box 916464 Longwood, FL 32791 CI-ANT, Inc. P. O. Box 916464 Longwood, FL 32791 The City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue. Clearwater, FL 34616 1 r -- - ro - . 1 a J ' FAFICEL L a . Fm= 3 _ r • ' If V? sI I r Q I i lYVf44- 11111 v r SOM O ? 2 1 +o • Q.ss ,,? 'rte cm VM .. = 6 -am • 1 3A* F7M= 7 Q P S J 1 J m 1 pp ; t aa a .ra t ..." < 2.4S A. TO BAY Y • 1': r w EXIMIT D-1 PARK PLACE BLVD. DEDICATION 10 w.w.: • AM1•w: Tate taNrwne.s ?refnrel hy: Gerald J. Biondo, Esq Mural, Wald, Biondo b Moreno, P. •••r 25 S.. E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33131 O."olr Apperame h,eN N..aaoM. from. X ooq,n: t m.N«p1 I.E. 0101 - VACIMOVITMSW1rORpROCIieNGOATH SPACE MOVE THIS LINO FOR R/COIIDOrG OATH ('II1?i8 (Q?UIt (1114illi PCCb, Etecuted the //?'?dayof September PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, first party, to THE CITY OF CLEARWATER whose post office address is second parry. .1995 , by fVn...M •r.e M,.M 14. 1•rw •ar.t,.ry ... 'rN«1,Mj Mt41a. .1 IM Ir,t4r w dam w,IM1MM .•114. 4.4•,11,.1 r•,r.,•.rtan,, ere nN,u N M1w1•J, W W ,wuN•ra.M ury., N a.rp.rwlor, .Mr.M W aar"n a 011.40 w rae•.w.) Pilntsstlh, that the first parry, for and in consideration of the sum of 310.00 in hand paid by the said second parry, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged does hereby remise, release, and quit- claim unto the second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the saidfirst party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas , State of Florida , to-wit: SEE EXI(IBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. r 3Ia ? ttbe nnb to ?61b, The same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either In law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. pri Fitness Pliertaf, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida Signed sealed and delivered 'r the presence of,• limited partnership By: PARK PLACE LAND, INC., a Florida co poration luwa .,tw. twMbN Orw))J sl t . ?R?E/VE- /i51VNt Stewart Marcus, President From I , M Now c 7o Clinton International Group, Inc. (???L«-n"f'? ??'«•?--? 2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard 31goodr. to w Ibms Grams) ! 1aHOfnt:dr1'1 Cables, FL 33134 `Jc'all. tCJtr x'.? exr?,c?-Q teems wtaw"sip.aea(aIn Coonaw, it oar) hWa Maw fleas leww.(aa wC.4eew, eql p,rwd now, Co-0luw llpotwa fir mar) '?- hale Naw MI Ollk. Atlrwa COUNTY OF 1 hereby Ceeify that an Ibis day, before me, •e olricer duly w sod to administer oalbs and lake aeknowled?meds, pen y appeared known to me to be the perwe described is lad who executed the foretoins issirunicd, -he acksorled efere ms that executed the Same, and an oath was e01 Iakea (Check 0e00 Said person(s) islare personally type of Ideetirscdion: keo.e Said perwn(s)prorided the following II reOTAAT WSUR aTANp SEAL el la fl ,'7Tleasi my bond lad ofr.w •nl in Ike County sad Side last aforesaid this day of . A.D.19_, NwOrr al,w0,w. hioNd Motor Minarets (ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ON NEXT PAGE) ..: " 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 STATE OF FLORIDA ) as. COUNTY OF DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September, 1995 by ?fKJAra Manus as relic Tf- , of PARK PLACE LAND, INC., a Florida corporation, the sole general partner of PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Fie is personally known to me or has produced as identification. L NOTAR UBLIC, ATE OF FLORIDA Print name: Commission No.: My Commission expires: DACEY T a t p laq Mt. S we e d Fb p ti ? *ne a ? v? awn evkel Sept 14. Im- i He.CC22Nf1 i y. t t THIS IS NU A SURVEY N 0 JO 60 120 iiiii-MQ SCALE, I" a 60' r f C u 0? `j? , .0O0Q?? ? :J q- y/bj fj . rJ r ?. ,A ? ?r SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND t`7 CURVE AND LINE TABLES. PARK PLACE BOULEVARD PARCEL 2 iC ttuL Nam t:HEOLM 1 herebr, cerlll?r Ihol 11115 legal descrlpllon end slel<h 817195 J.V.J. J.V.J. • K.J.B. meals the minimum lechnlcal 1lowdoree as set /orlh IDA 314 by the Florida Board of Prolesslonol Land Surveyors SII1I7151ft aAilrL in Chapter 61617.6 Florida Aden,'ni it H C 1999-342-000.414 IT 29 S. 16 E. E KING ENGINEERING ASSOC/A rE3, /NC, ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS jl? SCIENTISTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS t I 24943 IAL 1`00"AT 19 MONT11 CLCAIIWAT(e, rLOMA 34622 (9131 191.1441 , rAA (613) 791.e22e s a ve ode. Parsuonl io SettIon 472.027. Florida Slatules Shelch and Legal Descrlplion nol raid unless signed and embossed WIIh Swveyor s Seal CERTIFIED AS.PTO SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION KEfRrJ!BOUFFARO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 15172 STATE OF FLORIDA Shoal I of 2 "ARK 7.S. 609. PCiJ P.O.B. 6010TM9rt6T COMM of P&AX fLACC SOMEVARe a? 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARK PLACE BOULEVARD - PARCEL 2 A tract of land lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the Southwest corner of Park Place Boulevard, according to the plat of Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Park Place, as recorded in Plat Book 109, on pages 10 through 11 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the southerly boundary lines of said plat, the following three (3) courses; (1) thence S59°52'00"E, for 80.00 feet; (2) thence S30'08'00"W, for 141.11 feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave to the Northwest; (3) thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 2000.00 feet, a central angle of 00°73'52", an arc length of 13.89 feet and a chord bearing S30'19'56"W, for 13.88 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 2, according to said plat; thence continue southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 2000.00 feet, a central angle of 13'40'4T, an are length of 477.51 feet and a chord bearing S37*=16"W, for 47638 feet to the point of intersection with a non-tangent line; thence N45'47'20"W, for 80.00 feet to the point of radial intersection with a curve concave to the Northwest; thence northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 1920.00 feet, a central angle of 14'04'39', an are length of 471.74 feet and a chord bearing N37'10'20"E, for 470.56 feet to the point of tangency; thence N3(r08'00"E, for 141.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.14 acres, more or less. LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE LI $59'52'00"E 80.00' L2 N45.47'20"W 80.00' CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA CI 2000.00' 13.89' 6.94' 13.88' 530.19'56-W 00.23'52" C2 2000.00' 477.5r 239.90' 476.38' S37'2216-W 13740'4 " C3 1920.00' 471.74' 237.07' 470.56' N37'10'20"E 14°04'39" t SHEE-r 2 OF 2 TMS 1SatnwsnlhquN M: Gerald J. Biondo, Eaq Murat, Wald, Biondo b Moreno, P.. ' AeM••N 25 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 900 Miami, Florida 33131 ?rg0„r ANaaftwe ?e.e.t t"Wesare (Feat No,*sge N 11 0,400.1.111.2. ".1 VAC1 ASOVt THO N1 FOR n10CI=MG DATA L 1 f] VACI AIOVI TNG LINO FOR AICORDING DATA ('hil'ts (Quit (91aim pt9b, Executed the // ? day of September -1995 , by PARK PLACE BUILDING, LTD.. a Florida limited partnership, frs(pa?ty, to THE CITY OF CLEARWATER whose post office address is second party. (M.Mr.wrw.1M,•w ,M ,•r..'ar••rut'.w1'w,M1r•nj 1.•41.•1,Mi.w4,»AY4.,nwr.l ..11\. MY.. Y)N,.rn•..W.,... W u,y.• d MW.N. W Ia. •wru,en W .uyn •.vrwOW,.M,..u M.w.n,4./W r,.plrw.l PUnes seLh, 17tat the first parry, for and In consideration of the sum of 1!0.00 , in hand paid by the said second parry, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release, and quit. claim unto the second parryforever, all the right, tide, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of fond, situate, lying and being in (he County of Pinellas • State of Florida • to-wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. to ?htbe wta 10 ?LoLb, The same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. c1n Pitness Pilercaf, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. PARK PLACE BUILDING, LTD., a Florida Signs sealed and delivered in the presence of limited partnership By: PARK PLACE BUILDING, INC.. a A A0 ?G Florida corporation - .Jaws .f»»nu ?,01 01 u. ye?F.?F t?iSY!//V ` Stewart Marcus President ?. s r c/o Clinton InternatXonal Group, Inc. l(d1?1 ? ?:. ZL2f v _ do been-$eeleMerd wli,wr ar/rMef»»raM Orrrw) / ?eN 0?K,?i Coral Gables, FL 33134 erw»e ire.. l r Wk-jap0r• to is cWtin w.umn hood NeeN Rw Jila.ae.Iw» CO.pu»y Mea?) C?GnaM sigam" (N w) MO.a Neno ?w, Mike A1ar»s hla»e Name COUNTY OF - 1 bereby Ceeify 141 on this day, before me, as *Mcer duly w zed 10 adrnisislet oaths red take acknowlsdgmess Pen y appeared 1 -• knows to no Is be As psnos described in sad who executed 14 roneoiae iaskvmsal, who aeknowle efoa me that j sRefsled tha cams, and so sails was Sot takes. (Cheek oas:) 0 Sat/ penes(a) is/are penonally known SAW person(s)Provided The rollowisit type of IdeNificedem: NOTARY RUNIR JTAM? UAL noes) my bond and official seal in the County and State lass aforesaid ibis darof A.D. 19- mom J+aeNwf al •- h»Nd "N.Y Jya.aae e fl (ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ON NEXT PAGE) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i y. STATE OF FLORIDA ) ss. COUNTY OF DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September, 1995 by `5ytwe,y u tco c, as ?s.it.,? , of PARK PLACE BUILDING, INC., a Florida corporation, the sole general partner of PA PLACE BUILDING, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, o beh cf the partnership. He is personally known to me r h produced as iduntificati NOTARY P STA FLO'rIDA Print na • r? - \?¢t(e Commission No.: My Commission expires: j' • DACET n=RA•80VEnE ?8 *" P ??n Spl N.1191 ftecrMs t t t HIS IS pjQl A SURVEY \ an??a .2ai',Ca. O IS 30 60 SCALE, I" = 30' S64.32'56"E 24.65' :.C' J X31 • ?y? PARCEL 1 104 Sq. Fla ca / r'h i? • fj " • Im '?a SI r1r ?jY? S.E. CORNER PARK PLACE BOULEVARD P .3` Py 90 j 4r vs. 2 •/ `17 ; { 0 (' • rp' 4 -,t0 0lil C.,?' COr?fST P.O.B. oq+E'q ?r:rJ v f t Ja CURVE RAOIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA Cl C2 2000.00' 2000.00' 13.89' 477 51 6.94' 239 90' 13.88' S30'19'S6-W ' ' ' 00.23'52" C3 2000.00' . 1).00' . .00' 476.38 10.00' S37 22 16 W S44.2r15'w 13'40'47" 00117'19' C4 C5 410.00' ' 38 58' ' 19.31' 38.57' S41'48'06'W 0 1510.00 54.68 27.34' 54.68' N40.25'46-E 02.04'29" - SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION I PARK PLACE BOULEVARD PARCEL z z RM (IIIIIA>111111 t IMI Ltrs= 1 herebyr cerllly that Ibis legal descrlplion and sketch 1":30' 8/7195 J.V.J. J.V.J. K.J.B. meals the minimum ,ethnical standards as set torlh 07 the Florida Board of Protesslenal Land Surva7ors f[r1m IJIfat71!< am" In Chapter 61617-6 Florida. Administrative Code. 1999-342-000.414 17 29 S. 16 E. pursuant to Section 472.027. Florida Statutes Skelch and Legal Descrlptlon not valid unless signed KING ENGINEERING ASSOC/ATESr INC. and amt./+ad with Surve7oi s Seal ENGWERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS CERTIFIED AS TO SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCIENTISTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS s ( 24947 U.S. MONww 19 NORTH CLEARWATER. rLOnOA 34627 ARO (0131 791,140 • rAX. (tit) 791.92:e PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 9 5172 STATE OF FLORIDA Sheet I of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARK PLACE BOULEVARD - PARCEL 1 A tract of land lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of Park Place Boulevard, according to the plat of Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Park Place, as recorded in Plat Book 109, on pages 10 through 11 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the westerly boundary lines of Lot ' 2 of said plat, the following two (2) courses; (1) thence S30'08'00"W, for 141.11 feet to the point of curvature with a curve concave to the Northwest; (2) thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 2000.00 feet, a central angle of 00'23'52", an arc length of 13.89 feet and a chord bearing S30°19'56"W, for 13.88 feet to the Southwest corner ' of said Lot 2; thence continue southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 2000.00 feet, a central angle of 13'40'47", an arc length of 477.51 feet and a chord bearing S37'22'16"W, for 476.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 2000.00 feet, a central angle of 00'17'11", an ' arc length of 10.00 feet and a chord bearing S44'21'15"W, for 10.00 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave to the Southeast; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 410.00 feet, a central angle of 05'23'31", an arc length of 3858 feet and a chord bearing S41'48'06"W, for 3857 feet; thence N53'28'20"W, for 10433 ' feet; thence S64*3256"E, for 24.65 feet to the point of intersection with a non-tangent curve concave to the Northwest; thence northeasterly along the arc of said curve with a radial bearing N48*31'5VW, and having a radius of 1510.00 feet, a central angle of 02'04'290, an arc length of 54.68 feet and a chord bearing N40'25'46"E, for 54.68 feet to the point of intersection with a non-tangent line; thence S45°4T20"L, for 82.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4,404 square feet, more or less. SHEET 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT F u 1 PERMIT INFORMATION List of Development Approvals and Permits [For Reporting Year Ending 9/1/951 Note: This List of Permits and Approvals Pertains to the Outparcel Development. Annroval&ermit envy Submittal Dates Action Preliminary Site Plan City of Clearwater 06/2/94 Approved 8/30/94 Variance Application City of Clearwater 08/30/94 Denied (Landscape Buffer) Noticed General SWFWMD 09/06/94 Approved 10/03/94 Construction Permit Drainage Connection Permit FDOT 09/06/94 Approved 11/04/94 Certified Final Site Plan City of Clearwater 10/26/94 Latest Approved 08/09/95 Dredge & Fill ACOE 10/28/94 Approved 11/16/94 Construction Plans City of Clearwater 10/31/94 Approved Water Permit (Fire Protection) City of Clearwater 11/03/94 Approved 11/09/94 Water Permit (Fire Protection) Pinellas Co. Health Dept. 11/10/94 Approved 11/18/94 Wastewater Permit FDEP 11/10/94 Approved 12/13/94 Utility Permit MOT 12/22/94 Approved (Water Taps in R/W) Preliminary Plat City of Clearwater 03/09/95 Approved 05/04/95 Special Use Permit FDOT 03/23/95 Approved 6/20/95 (S/W Construction in R/W) NOI for Stormwater Discharge USEPA 04/03/95 Approved Final Plat City of Clearwater 05/17/95 Recorded 09/06/95 Water Certification of Completion Pinellas Co. Health Dept. 09/07/95 Approved 09/07/95 Wastewater Certification FDEP 09/07/95 Approved 12/02/95 of Completion Construction Certification SWFWMD 10/30/95 Approved 11/29/95 (PPDRl92.95) 21 1 EX [BTr G COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDMONS AND ADA COUNTS All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments, as contained in the Park Place Development Order (amended 12/19/91) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: CONDMONS AND COMMITMENTS COMPLIANCE SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and Final Site Plans submit- ted for each phase and consistent with the DRI "Conceptual Plan". AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversation factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. B. All development shall be consistent with applicable land development codes. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedi- cated to the City of Clearwater. BB. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. con- structed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels ' 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 SF ' (795,520 SF office use - 150,000 SF retail - 200,000 SF industrial) subject to con- version factor. CC. Mass transit requirements. 1 D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of ' the project. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to the first Final Site Plan approval after 1/19/95. F. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - All development activity must receive the appropriate City approval consistent with the "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved via Ordinance No. 5722-95. No action required during this reporting year. All development activity is reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater at time of plan approval. Developer has complied - see Exhibit D-1. No action required during reporting year. No action required during reporting year. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. Access previously acquired. All Developer commitments have been met. (PPDRI92.95) 22 CONDMONS AND COQ NTS COMPLIANCE ' G. Funding commitments for transportation 1. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. ' L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the project drainage system. improvements. HK.. Requiring Designated certain aquatic City lands shall cooperation. ' J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and mainte- nance thereof. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting period. Developer has continued to assure on-going maintenance. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. Developer has continued to assure on-going safe disposal of run-off. SWFWMD has issued permits for all land development activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. ' N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. ' O. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC ' recommendations. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required. ' R. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as needed. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. (PPDRl9295) 23 NDMONS AND COMMITMENTS COMPLIAN CE ?s 1 1T Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. . All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. A capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. ?w 1 X. ? Y. ?z Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. Maintenance of on-site wells. City requirement to provide certain services (a City commitment, N/A). Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. No action required during the reporting period. The City and/or County will provide services as required. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvements in accordance with applicable revised Development Order conditions. (PPDRI9295 24 • • I LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 February 26, 2004 Mr. Tim Johnson, Esquire 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Dear Mr. Jo son: The City and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council have not received the annual report for the Park Place Development of Regional Impact I (DRI #92). This report was due on September 1, 2003. Please submit the report within 30 days. If you need any additional information, please contact me at 562-4587. Sincerely yours, Gina L. Clayton Long Range Planning Manager Cc: John Meyer, TBRPC BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILLJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVii ACTION EMPLOYER" • D o ? ?I- I 1 IF if - - Tampa Say,R,eglonal Plannln® Council Chair Commissioner Steve Simon February 13, 2004 Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Mr. Robert Kersteen Manny Pumariega Ms. Cynthia Tarapani, Director City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Subject: Nonsubmittal of DRI Annual Report DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater, RY 2002-03, Due 9/1/03 Dear Ms. Tarapani: Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(18) Florida Statutes (F.S.), this letter is notification that the annual report(s) for the above-referenced Development of Regional Impact (DRI) has not been submitted by the date specified in the Development Order (as indicated above). The regional planning council, or the state land planning agency (the Florida Department of Community Affairs), is required to notify the local government of failure by the DRI developer to submit an annual report. Subsection 380.06(18), F.S., also requires the local government to request in writing that the developer submit the delinquent report within 30 days, and states that, "The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government." Please copy this office on ail future correspondence to the developer regarding this matter. If your records indicate a different due date from the one indicated in this letter, please transmit documentation of the new due date to John Meyer at TBRPC. Any Development Order amendments which actually change reporting or expiration dates should specify the new dates. This is important in regard to annual report due dates, phase completion dates and Development Order expiration dates. 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100, Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Phone (727) 570-5151 Fax (813) 570-5118 State Number 513-5066 www,tbrpc.org ,O 0 • The annual report non-submittal noted in this letter is for the reporting year noted in the subject heading. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, 7MMeyer DRI Coordinator JMM/bj PC: Mr.. Kevin Smith, Bausch & Lomb Surgical Nis. Marina Pennington K 0 ing ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Environmental Engineering Land Planning Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping Construction Management GIS Mapping 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 Phone 813 880 8881 Fax 813 880 8882 www.kingengineering.com December 13, 2001 Mr. Ralph Stone City of Clearwater Central Permitting Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: Park Place DRI Annual Report Dear Ralph: In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 380.06(18), F.S., and the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order for the Park Place DRI, enclosed are three (3) copies of the Annual Report for the year ending September 1, 2001 and any applicable review fees. A copy of this report is being concurrently submitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs and Southwest Florida Water Management District. Sincerely, ot'-- VY1 Chris Papandreas, AICP Senior Planner/Project Manager P- CP/mgv/jab - - - ?- Enclosure - cc: Larry Gelb, Bausch & Lomb Surgical John Meyer, DRI Coordinator, TBRPC, w/encl. J. Thomas Beck, Chief, Bureau of State Planning, DCA, w/encl. Mark Phelps, SWFWMD, w/encl. Project File #1255-012-000 O:Admin\2001 TrojecA 1255-012-000/Letters/stoneO I C P PARK PLACE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 2001 December 2001 PREPARED FOR: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 PREPARED BY: 9,0 1 Mi..mrial Highway k On ?Aeiaorial Center, Suite 300 Tampa; Florida 33534 O:Admin\2001 \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 1 II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT ...................................... 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - PARK PLACE OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT F - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS O:Admin\2001 Troject\ 125 5-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP I. INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via DRI Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91, 5722-95 and 6107-96) and Chapter 380.06 (18) F.S., and in conformance with Form RPM-BSP Annual Report-1. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Council (TBRC), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 9/1/2000 to 9/1/2001 Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Name of DRI Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer - Name: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL Company Name Address: 21 Park Place Boulevard North Street Location Clearwater. FL 34606 City, State, Zip Code 1. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. EXHIBIT A SHOULD ALSO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS IF APPLICABLE: A. DESCRIBE CHANGES IN THE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR PHASING FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AND FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS; B. STATE ANY KNOWN INCREMENTAL DRI APPLICATIONS FOR O:Admin\200I \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stoneO I CP DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OR REQUESTS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION THAT WERE FILED IN THE REPORTING YEAR AND TO BE FILED DURING THE NEXT YEAR; C. ATTACH A COPY OF ANY NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER OR THE SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF AN ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT WAS RECORDED BY THE DEVELOPER PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 380.06 (15) (F), F.S. No changes occurred to the currently approved plan of development during this reporting year. EXHIBIT A of this report contains a summary of Development Order changes for the project. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. No change in local jurisdiction occurred during this reporting year. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. During the reporting year no change has occurred to The Amended Master Development Site Plan (MAP H) included in this report as EXHIBIT B. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. Please see EXHIBIT C of this report. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS O:Admin\2001 Troject\ 125 5-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. To the best of our knowledge, no tract Ownership has been transferred or changed. See Exhibit D for complete property ownership information. 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. Please see EXHIBIT E, PERMIT INFORMATION, for a summary list of permit and approval information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. A list summarizing each Development Order condition and the developer's compliance with each condition is attached as EXHIBIT F, COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: O:Admin\2001\Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued on February 2001 on the 85 000sf. office building located- on_.P-arcel-8. This certificate has since expired and requires compliance to conditions. Other than that, we have no specific knowledge of additional plans being prepared or which may be submitted during the forthcoming reporting year for the remaining undeveloped portion of the DRI. and: a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits .... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report. There are no plans for additional development on the site at the present time. and: a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year. No trade-off mechanisms were used by Park Place developers during this reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Council, the State Department of Community Affairs and the Southwest Florida Water Management District on December 13, 2001. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have been sent a copy of this report. Person completing the questionnaire: Chris Papandreas. AICP Title: Senior Planner/Project Manager King Engineering Associates, Inc. Representing: Bausch & Lomb Surgical O:Admin\2001 \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP III. EXHIBITS Exhibit A - Summary of Development Order Changes Exhibit B - Revised Map H, Master Development Plan Exhibit C - Summary of Development Activity Exhibit D - Park Place DRI Ownership Exhibit E - Permit Information Exhibit F - Compliance With Development Order Conditions O:Admin\2001 \Project\ 125 5-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT A Summary of Development Order Changes O:Admin\200I \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stoneO I CP EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 99.1 acres of commercial and office development with 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail uses. To annex the project into the City, the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance No. 3287-83. Ordinance No. 5142-91 subsequently amended the Development Order and Conceptual Plan to provide 200,000sf of industrial use, a maximum floor area ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change to the project phasing, extension of build-out date and a change in the timing of payment for transportation costs. Ordinance 5722-95 further amended the Order by changing development phasing to one phase, decreasing office space, extending the build-out date to the year 2000, and adding a conversion factor to allow for multi-family residential development along with the conversion of either office or industrial to multi-family. The latest amendments to the Park Place development order were approved by the City as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, 1996. This amendment provided the land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. The current project components are as follows: Existing Approved / Under Construction Proposed Maximum Retail Commercial 82,020 150,000 Office 389,028 795,520 Industrial 100,000 200,000 Residential 390 510 Please see EXHIBIT B of this Annual Report for the adopted MAP H, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. O:Admin\2001 TrojectU 255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT B Revised Map H Master Development Plan O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0I CP EXHIBIT C Summary of Development Activity O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone01 CP EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY During the 200/01 reporting year, no construction was initiated. O:Admin\2001\Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stoneO I CP EXHIBIT D Park Place DRI Ownership O:Admin\2001 \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP I? 1 1 ' I I 1 1 I I r• A 1 i I I t 1 A q ? 1 1 1 ? 0 1 Q 1 Y? 1 !] Y G A?? I L- 1 W r-- ? y> I A? tr 1 y II p N l.. 1 G 1 W 1 I I n, MEAA Q9as AO^"...71 )4L^9 1 ``. r A?IRl ertrr ` roan DC004MrUM air ? ? W=YQ. ? (lAJU - 419Qmwnal n cn Aar. LJ?`,I^- -___---- -__r:.:L:r ?r?..r-- ?j.'...._,? _.!++?m?.:' . r ?••? xMGMd??Nr -4 i-f Q)pC1911a I f>Tf.7Am901fj I i 1 PlA1'7mt:Q/? I Mwl AM I PMPM M wro ml Poo rlrn) 82,M0 S.F. 9 STCV OFFICE or r..ara , 97.':9 IlAr, .? S I~ wrtYw--- . - ? N4atw r°m6 to 0111 / ?-------------- / 1 I U[ I I ?M1DO1 r J101ID6C\ ' (A P &2LCM ma A411Y• rAA.ml. AMA U3 NW.. V FpxWAGE I "170 I ROAD SCEW" NOTE >mwu lcm][rommrQatA>rAm - I. atRwlQ 1IIY63 4[IGIQI )All m xmaao I I I +.? vn.n 4no.r a1A RRQ 0)Q71 91ro1 m 4om ?? u¦ is ormoam ° aw a ° N Vt a i4 NAl 6 N N U14°0lnwtlm am w mmY r¦Qrt llm y %"V. °t)4A ORw (ni w Y pYQ t N In MUKwI u K , 4K.. www 4m rr, .a n• N VAS ,0qn art. N fDOn mm Olp Alm N N AM=w9'Q a n r7w wmO N .t.R R am N M= Ft= YU NO FAA N . aYF Wu V.es I tA1 ? o N 6 Qw.w uo N e f N w? I? p[ N N w N 7 N Yn/Lr W N M N I®r wY at FEMNM IF wKww N N ur w0 Rr w Ir7wm6Ylw4anr1Q6ro N 0u r4Q IvllRlturm awl mR IR IV mn AQ 77 sm N 1°TTrin.V1Poxwo N Nunn u. mm awl 0to R°mwrm Iiwm ° Urr V. 7m > Z° N N Elm=1mAIQ Mum M Vv •Ir noQ w•na r.IQi a OltAO YaRAA m•r46 °nR117 Mtl w.ralR 4w N CM M. MYi Q. wtO Q.R N 2" sum Rl wut w Mm ? Wa 1 °v?x LUMt A= IRA 4w= V. N IF. M nlA ?0° I ATl00C VNl I I 0V) ? I I % I / I I M ff"J -q M ^ Cq % my ?\ % % \ \\ % / 1 i - P%i i i i I e r a I S? .m Y. I I wxar Y6mi Ipl Nf,4? I I ?1 /nw I i 91>?rY m a? I ?. I I '^ I I ? r .i II ? I I wr.n1 II -____J i PAFXM SPACE DETAL I au I M.Y.a r • ?.s gal. .anuw Y' ntY ?YY'4 4a. r ter: r ?.? .Y w r.n Yar l.•i .rawM ?? m r? PFS C-W WHEEL STOP HANDICAPPED PAFiClVO auL alA Si lr a..a Mc.¦ iota m¦ r mw ENGIMFER/NG ASSCCIArES, iivc, PARK PLACE - U.S.19 PARCEL Engineers - Planners • Surveyors • Scientists - landscape Architects 24946 u? ,A, 1110 w,Wl. ?o Iva 8409 9Y I. A-Z AY. EXHIBIT B-1 *31 ?3941 ? rNAa R. 73609 dlr..IYl Nlmq ,4 74653 FINAL SITE PLAN ' (d7) 113.00 (MI 846.0904 a YrA L=UAL U =A,;f' -MN wi'sri ?.Y w rwr iN l r ?i rvr w rI. r4.w ly N+.wrnrr.r- MrrlFr r r.Ylwr.w Ywrrwlr..rr lnw w-r1?.•arr N?1.?1.?WY r1yy..Yr Y. Y.Y Y.....wM rwM¦q?+/ W rw.1.41Y.Yr64rY r ruu u.w.wir.vnwr w.wY was 4 raver wM..../..n w.w. MYa47 wYr..r raYr ..:w1 MFwewl.a >N r..IY Irr. l4 r.wrwrl w .r.Iwwww•..... rr.. r.•?YY Y..w.n.v4+ru wa.w vn¦rw. w. r?4rn14 Y..YwYr r iMIyyYyyNM .r.1 YwYw wa.wr?I YI 4LLI r1 b.? Iw:^Y.YY? yV1MrwY?Y .r+. w. N Y rq.Y °a N r )Ila rt YIIwYYM 4'^4 lu r ®. r.r?.¦. r. w r v n¦ rr. v M.r...lw? Y4N n4. n¦w Nlw.Or/./YY an r.. v.rr. rr..Iw MrI 4rn bw.`Z ....rlrMr,nvrw.n.r....r •.r r Y*.nra .ar 1..Y. r w. w r rr 1 rr ?nvrra.Yw44rr¦r•. r..vaYrrwr Mwwl. r.rw?rr ?ry M..N ' N¦R ?.Y ?I t\M.WiI Yrgp l?pYL? MYA w4....rr..r `.w.rwlu.a wvr R9. Ym. 1 MT nraoa er EXHIBIT D PARK PLACE DRI OWNERSHIP Parcel Parcel No. Property Owner 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P. 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 474 S. Northlake Boulevard Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche 3225 Aviation Avenue #700 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 Stacy Glenborough 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 400 South El Camino Rio 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 San Mateo California 94402 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 Highwoods Properties Holdings 3111 W. Martin Luther King Boulevard #300 Tampa, Florida 33601 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 Alex-Arl Florida Company 901 Venetian Bay Blvd. Venice, FL 34292 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010 Clant, Inc. 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020 P.O. Box 916464 111C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030 Longwood, FL 37291 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 O:Admin\2001\Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT E Permit Information O:Admi n\2001 TrojecA 1255-012-000/Letters/stone0I CP EXHIBIT E PERMIT INFORMATION List of Development Approvals and Permits For Reporting Year Ending September 1, 2001 Approval/Permit Agency Status/Approval Date PARCEL 1 Modification of Existing Wastewater Manhole as Instructed by the City of Clearwater, in order to allow for sampling point to be installed City of Clearwater August 2001 PARCEL 1 State of Florida April 2001 Proposed State Department of Highway access Transportation connection O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT F Compliance With Development Order Conditions O:Admin\2001\Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP EXHIBIT F COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments, as contained in the Park Place DRI Development Order (amended 11/221/96) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: Conditions & Commitments Compliance SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and final Site Plans submitted for each phase and consistent with DRI "Conceptual Plan". All development activity must receive the appropriate City approval, consistent with the "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved vis Ordinance No. 6107-96. AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. B. All development shall be consistent with applicable land development codes. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated to the City of Clearwater. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. constructed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 sf (795,520sf office use, 150,000sf retail, 200,000sf industrial) subject to conversion factors. CC. Mass transit requirements. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to the first Final Site Plan approval after 1/19/95. Developer has complied. All development activity is reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater at time of plan approval. Developer has complied. Park Place Blvd. Constructed and accepted by City. Conversion factor utilized to allow 390 multifamily units. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. (Bus stop on Park Place Blvd. was constructed as part of apartment project) Access previously acquired. All developer commitments have been met. O:Admin\2001 TrojectU 255-012-000/Letters/stone0l CP Conditions & Commitments Compliance EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City 10' easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. Developer has complied. F. -Deleted via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. Curb cut and median turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting year. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. (Approved Grand Reserve Site Plan maintains aquatic lands) Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the SWFWMD have been issued permits for all land project drainage system. development activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. The individual contractors are being held responsible for compliance with permit conditions. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as needed. 0. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. O:Admin\200I Project\1255-012-000/Letters/stone0lCP Conditions & Commitments Compliance Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required R. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. S. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. T. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. U. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. V. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. W X. Y Z. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. Maintenance of on-site wells. Proposed development complies by connecting Hampton Road to Park Place Blvd. To existing Drew St. and US 19 shopping with sidewalks. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Osprey nest has been relocated successfully and occupied by osprey. Developer has complied; a capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Well on Parcel 2 required rerouting to provide fresh water. Original well was drilled too deep. SWFWMD permit was issued and well repaired accordingly. N/A (City requirement) Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvement costs in accordance with the applicable revised Development Order conditions. O:Admin\200I \Project\ 1255-012-000/Letters/stoneO I CP K lit 14 E NGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Environmental Engineering Land Planning Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping Construction Management GIS Mapping 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 Phone 813 880 8881 Fax 813 880 8882 www.kingengineering.com G? March 7, 2002 Ms. Cindy Tarapani City of Clearwater Central Permitting Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: Park Place Annual Report (DRI Dear Ms. Tarapani: MAR 1 1 ._?. Cwv2 PLAN. r i Y Lit / `? C_• ri5' SV Please insert the enclosed revision page into the 2001 annual report for Park Place, which was submitted on January 14, 2002. The report, which was previously submitted, misstated the amount of office space that has been built to date. Thank-you for your assistance in this matter. Yours truly, ekwerawla_ Chris Papandreas, AICP Senior Planner/Project Manager CP/jab Enclosure cc: Larry Gelb, Bausch & Lomb Surgical John Meyer, DRI Coordinator, TBRPC w/encl. J. Thomas Beck, Chief, Bureau of State Planning, DCA w/enclosure Mark Phelps, SWFWMD w/enclosure Nick Shakelton, HTG Commercial Group w/enclosure File # 1255-012-000 0:\ADM1N\2002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\Tarapani0l.CP. doc EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by-the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 99.1 acres of commercial and office development with 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail uses. To annex the project into the City, the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance No. 3287-83. Ordinance No. 5142-91 subsequently amended the Development Order and Conceptual Plan to provide 200,000sf of industrial use, a maximum floor area ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change to the project phasing, extension of build-out date and a change in the timing of payment for transportation costs. Ordinance 5722-95 further amended the Order by changing development phasing to one phase, decreasing office space, extending the build-out date to the year 2000, and adding a conversion factor to allow for multi-family residential development along with the conversion of either office or industrial to multi-family. Amendments to the Park Place development order were approved by the City as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, 1996. This amendment provided the land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. Ordinance 6678-01 approved in 2001 amended the Development Order as shown in the table below. The current project components are as follows: Existing Retail Commercial 81,020 Office 304,639 Industrial 100,000 Residential 390 Approved / Under Construction Proposed Maximum 85,000- 81,120 404,639 200,000 390 *Site Plan approval, 2001 - Table revised 3/6/02 Land use trade-off rates for Parcel 6 were established to allow multi-family or hotel use to occur on- site. The build-out date for the development order was extended to 2003. Please see EXHIBIT B of this Annual Report for the adopted MAP H, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 0:\ADM1N\2002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc lil ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Environmental Engineering Land Planning Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping Construction Management GIS Mapping 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 Phone 813 880 8881 Fax 813 880 8882 www.kingengineering.com January 14, 2002 Ms. Cindy Tarapani City of Clearwater Central Permitting Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: Park Place DRI Annual Report, Revised Dear Cindy: In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 380.06(18), F.S., and the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order for the Park Place DRI, enclosed are three (3) copies of the revised Annual Report for the year ending September 1, 2001 Any applicable review fees were submitted on December 19, 2001. Please discard all copies of our earlier (December 19, 2001) submittal. A copy of this report is being concurrently submitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs and Southwest Florida Water Management District. Sincerely, Chris Papandreas, AICP Senior Planner/Project Manager CP/mgv/jab Enclosure cc: Larry Gelb, Bausch & Lomb Surgical Nick Shakelton, Clinton International John Meyer, DRI Coordinator, TBRPC, w/encl. J. Thomas Beck, Chief, Bureau of State Planning, DCA, w/encl. Mark Phelps, SWFWMD, w/encl. Project File #1255-012-000 0:\ADMM002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc 7 77 7 Tampa SavXegional Planning Council Chairman vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Councilman Jerry King Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon March 28, 2002 Mr. Kevin Smith Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 34606 Ayle? Executive Director Manny L. Pumariega Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Annual Report Summary, RY2000-01, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Smith: The above-referenced item will be considered at the April 8, 2002 meeting of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council which will be held at the Council offices at 10:00 a.m. A copy of the report and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative wish to attend. To staff's knowledge, no change in local government jurisdiction has occurred, no undeveloped land has been sold, no properties have been purchased or optioned adjacent to the original DRI and no changes in the plan of development or phasing have been made during the reporting period, unless specified in the annual report summary. A list of permits obtained, applied for or denied during the reporting period and confirmation of the required distribution of the annual report have been provided in the report, unless otherwise noted. Please refer to the last paragraph of the annual report summary for an assessment of consistency with the Development Order and for any additional information or clarifications needed. If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 570-5151, ext. 255. Sincerely, Jo eyer ordinator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: Ms. Cynthia H. Tarapani M . Chris Papandfeas, AICP 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 570-5118 State Number 513-5066 http://%,,lww.tbrpc.org Tampa Sav X egional l'Ianning Council Consent Agenda 04/08/02 Agenda Item #31.3. AIR S Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER RY 2000-01 ,on-September-l-,-I-983, the City of Clearwater -granted-a-Development-Order-(Or-di-nance-No 3205a &3),to Metro Development Corporation fora 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The_Dev_elopm-ent Order has subsequently-been-amended. four times, with-the-lutest-occurring_on February 1,200 .1. (Ordinance No...-6678-01). The ame-iidments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by 18 years (to December 31, 2003) based on the phasing consolidation. The Development Order duly expires on December 31, 2003. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is September 15` As currently approved, the following represents the plan of development: PROJECT BUILDOUT ' OFFICE INDUSTRIAL RETAIL RESIDENTIAL (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft) (M F. RUnits) December 31, 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 Development this Reporting Year: while no new development was initiated during the reporting year, the developer has reported that a site plan was approved for an 85,000 sq. ft. office building. Cumulative Development: the developer has completed 304,460 sq. ft. of office space, 100,000 sq. ft. of light industrial space, 82,020 sq. ft. of retail space and 390 multi-family residential units. Projected Development: although no specific development activity has been identified, construction of the aforementioned 85,000 sq. ft. office building would be anticipated during next year.. 1. The developer has identified continued compliance with mass transit requirements (Condition 4.CC.); stormwater runoff disposal (Condition 4.L.); and funding of transportation improvements (Conditions 4.E., 4.G. and 42.). 2. Condition 4.EE. requires the developer to provide the City with a ten-foot easement for pedestrian ingress/egress prior to the issuance of any permits for Parcel 4. The developer has previously stated that a sidewalk has been constructed. 3. The developer has previously verified that the Park Place Boulevard road improvement, illustrated as Parcel "A" ("Exhibit B"/Ordinance 5722-95), has been completed in accordance with Condition 4.N.2:, 4. The developer completed a capture-release program on December 6, 1991, consistent with Condition 4.T. The developer has additionally obtained an "Osprey Nest Relocation" permit from the Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission in 1996, consistent with Condition 4.S. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. A revised listing of the DRI property owners (by parcel) is attached and provided as Table 1. These property owners are responsible for fulfilling the obligations of the DRI. Bausch & Lomb Optical, 21 Park Place Boulevard North, Clearwater, FL 34606 prepared and submitted the annual report. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. The City of Clearwater is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. TABLE 1 PAR- MAX. FLOOR AREA CEL PARCEL NUMBER (Sq. Ft.) PROPERTY OWNER 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 200 000 - Industrial Bausch & Lomb Surgical, 21 Park Place Blvd. N., Clearwater, , , FL 34606 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020, 156 MF Res. Units The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P., 474 S. Northlake 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 234 MF Res, Units Blvd., Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 101 900 - Office' Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche, 3225 Aviation , Avenue #700, Coconut Grove, FL 33133 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 120,560 - Office Stacy Glenborough, 400 S. El Camino Rio, San Mateo, CA 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 50,278 - Retail 94402 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 100 000 - Office2 Park Place Land Ltd., Clinton International, 3225 Aviation , Avenue #700, Coconut Grove, FL 33133 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 82 179 - Office Highwoods Properties Holdings, 3111 W. Martin Luther King , Blvd., #300, Tampa, FL 33601 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 5 000 - Retail Alex-Arl Florida Company, 901 Venetian Bay Blvd., Venice, , FL 34292 Other than: 11,303 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010, sq. ft. (all Lot 10) and 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020, 14,539 sq. ft. (all Lot 11C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030, 11) of retail space, Clant Inc., Post Office Box 916464, Longwood, FL 32791 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040, further information is 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 not available for subdivided parcels. NOTES: 1. Ordinance No. 6107-96 authorized a potential conversion of Parcel 4 to a maximum of 224 hotel rooms in accordance with land use equivalency matrix provisions. 2. Ordinance No. 6678-01 authorized a potential conversion of Parcel 6 to multi-family and/or hotel uses in accordance with land use equivalency matrix provisions. r t Tampa Sav egtonal Tlanning Council Asenda Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Blvd. - Suite 219 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 April 8, 2002 10:00 a.m. *** THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC *** Agenda Item #1 Chairman King CALL TO ORDER Councilman Bob Matthews • Invocation and Pledge Recording Secretary Roll Call Recording Secretary Voting Conflict Report Sec/Treasurer Simon Approval of Minutes Agenda Item #2 Sec/Treasurer Simon Agenda Item #3 Chairman King Agenda Item #4 Chairman King Agenda Item #5 Agenda Item #6 Chairman King Commissioner Todd Agenda Item #7 Chairman King Agenda Item #8 Comm. Mary Maloof Vice Chair Todd Mr. Bill Lofgren Ms. Betti Johnson Vice Mayor Kynes Avera Wynne BUDGET COMMITTEE • Financial report for the period ending 02/28/02 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA, ADDENDUM ITEM(S) OR ANY OTHER ITEM REQUIRING COUNCIL DISCUSSION REVIEW ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION None. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGIONAL COUNCILS WASHINGTON POLICY CONFERENCE AND 5T" NATIONAL REGIONAL SUMMIT COUNCIL MEMBERS' COMMENTS PROGRAM REPORTS A. Agency on Bay Management (ABM) B. Clearinghouse Review Committee (CRC) - No Report. C. Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) D. Emergency Management E. Legislative Committee F. Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC) 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org :4 Agenda Item #9 EXECUTIVE/BUDGET COMMITTEE REPORT Chairman King Agenda Item #10 OTHER COUNCIL REPORTS Gerald Smelt A. Future of the Region 2002 Chairman King B. Office Space Progress Report Agenda Item #11 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Chairman King Agenda Item #12 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mr. Manny Pumariega Agenda Item #13 NEXT MEETING Chairman King A. Monday, May 13, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. Marriott Westshore 1001 North Westshore Blvd. Tampa B. Events Calendar for April 8th, 2002 through May 13th, 2002 in members folders. Agenda Item #14 ADJOURN Chairman King The Council, in accordance with its adopted rules of procedure, may only take action on matters not on the printed agenda involving the exercise of agency discretion and policy-making upon a finding by the Council of an emergency situation affecting the public's health, safety, and welfare. Council meetings are Public Meetings within the context of Section 286.011, Florida St= rtes. Council meetings are not Public Hearings within the context of Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. The Chairman has full discretion as to whether or not to recognize speakers other than Council members or staff, and is not required to recognize individuals to speak on issues before the Council. Public Hearings on issues before the Council are conducted by individual local governments, and are the proper forum for public comment. Please note that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at the above cited meeting or hearing, s/he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, s/he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Persons wishing to speak at a Council meeting are required to complete the form provided at the entrance to the meeting room. The form, after being completed, must be given to the Recording Secretary. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this meeting you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at 727-570-5151 within 3 working days of the meeting 2,105/2001 13:00 570-5118 PLANNING PAGE 02 Chairman Mayor Pat Whites€I June 19, 2001 JOIN Tampa Bay X eglonal Planning Council vice-Chairman Secretary/Trea5urer Councilman Jerry King Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Mr. Kevin Smith Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, Florida 33759 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater Anniversary Month - September Dear Mr. Smith: Executive Director tvianny L. Pumariega Chapter 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, (F.S.), requires the developer of an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRY) to submit an annual report to the local government, the regional planning agency, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and any additional identified ageney(ies) on the date specified in the. Development Order. Our records indicate that the anniversary month for your annual report is September. Please check your Development Order, as it may include information requirements in addition to those required by the DCA (see enclosed annual report format). The annual report should also identify activities completed for the reporting year and activities proposed for the coming year. Pursuant to Chapter 9J-2.0252, Florida Administrative Code, the DCA DRI Review Fee Rule (enclosed - see (6)), please submit a check for $250.00 made payable to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, along with &,e annual report. The check must include the DRI name and number for identification purposes. It is noted that Subsection 380.06(l 8), F-S-, indicates that if the local government does not receive the annual report or receives notification that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the developer submit the report within 30 days. The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government. 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219. St. Petersburg, FL 33702.2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 5'70.51 18 State Number S 13.5066 http:// v^v.lbipc,org 2/05/2001 13:00 570-5118 . PLANNING Please feel free to contact me if you have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, o M. Me ordinator VEMADi Enclosures cc: Mr. Ralph Stone Ms. Marina Pennington PAGE 03 2/05/2001 13:00 570-5118 PLANNING PAGE 04 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399 904/488-4925 FOPM RPM-BSP-ANNUAL REPORT-1 EFFECTIVE DATE 11/20/90 MANAGEMENT DEVELOPKENT OF REGIObrAi. iXPACT ANNUAL REPORT Subsection 380.06(18)1 Florida Statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an approved development of regional impact (DRY) for submitting an annual reportto th of local government, the regional planning agency, the p ent community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the date specified in the development order. The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date specified in the development order may result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the annual report is submitted to/the review agencies. This requirement applies to all developments of regional impact which have been approved since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions about this required report, call the DRI Planner at (904) 488--4925. Send the original completed annual report to the designated local government official stated in the development order with one copy to each of the following: a) The regional planning agency of jurisdiction; b) All affected permitting agencies; c) Division of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of State Planning 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399 r 2/05/2001 13:00 570-5118 PLANNING F mat your Annual Status Report.a.¢ter the folir%at example provided below- MMUAL STATUS REPORT PAGE 05 to Reporting Period: Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year. T-'?a-V*lopments Name of DRI Location: city county Developer: Name: company Name Address; Street Location City, State, Zip 1• Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval since the Develop- ment of Qdeviationtdereceived terminations)vtaken byeloany calacticns (substantial government to address these changes. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit A a detailed description of each change and copies of tplan applicable: also address a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent years; b) State any known incremental DRI applications for development approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year; _2/05/2001 13:00 570-5118 PLANNING PAGE 06 c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the subsequent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(15) (f), F.S. 2) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? It so, has the annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact development order for' the project? Provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government. 3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc., not previously submitted. Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences, attach as Exhibit B. 4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year as well as a cumulative total of development proposed and actually conducted to date. Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve- ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit C. 5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and the buyer. Provide maps which show the tracts involved. Tract Buyer Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit D. 6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use on a site plan and map. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit E. 3 .2/0512001 13:00 570-5118 PLANNING PAGE 07 7) List any substantial local# state, and federal permits which have been obtained, applied for, or denied during this reporting period. Specify the agency, type of permit, and duty for each. NOTE: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit F. s) Provide a list specifying each development order condition and each developer commitment as contained in the ADA and state how and when each condition or commitment has been complied with during the annual report reporting period. NOTE: Attach as Exhibit G. 5) Provide any information that is specifically required by the development order to be included in the annual report. 1o) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with Subsections 380.06(15) and (18), F.S. Person completing the questionnaire: Title: Representing: r 4 I. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard immediately east of U.S. 19 (See Figure 1). Park Place (DRI # 92) was originally approved in 1983, to have a build-out in 1991 and contain 150,000 s.f of retail commercial space and 1,103,000 s.f of office space. The development order was amended in 1994 and 1996 by two Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) to extend the build-out to 2000 and contain the following uses: Retail: Office: Lt. Industrial: 150,000 s.f.* 795,520 s.f.* 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office on parcel 4. The following development presently exists: Retail: Office: Lt. Industrial Apartment 81,120 s.f. 222,460 s.f. 100,000 s.f 390 d.u. The project is now being considered for a modification that would reduce the amount of approved office and retail space, extend the build-out date to December 31, 2003, and develop trade-off mechanisms for Parcel 6 to potentially convert office space to multi-family units or hotel rooms. This analysis will compare the transportation impacts of the approved development plan and those of the proposed development program. Specifically, three tests will be evaluated to determine the overall traffic impact reduction brought about by the revised development proposal and the revised build-out year. A comparison of external trip generation. 2. A determination of whether traffic from the revised project plus background growth projected through 2003 will exceed that which was projected in the original ADA. 3. A determination of whether total traffic in the revised build-out year will result in roadway improvements that differ from those identified in the current Development Order. A transportation methodology was agreed to at a methodology meeting held -at the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council on August 9, 2000. Letters of correspondence are included in Appendix D. 1 ah PARK PLACE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR PARK PLACE LAND LIMITED PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. SEPTEMBER 2000 FDC PROJECT # 172-07 DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION MAP PRD172 07 DATE: FIGURE: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9/00 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC EXHIBIT PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEV!AT!ON DETERMiNATiON CHART TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINALPLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space N/A NIA NIA # Spectators # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) N/A N/A NIA Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations { Hospitals # Beds NIA N/A N/A # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) 11 TYPE OF LAND USE . CHANGE CATEGORY. : PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOuS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE- Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) No change -0- 200,000 SF GFA (12/19/91- Ord. #5142-91) # Employees Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage. mined (year) NIA N/A N/A Water Withdrawal (Gal/day) Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross sq. ft.) 404,639 SF GFA 1,103,000 SF GFA 803,000 SF GFA (12/19/91-Ord. #5142-91) # Parking Spaces 795,520 SF GFA (1/19/95-Ord. #5722.95)' # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations 159,840 square feet of Office was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units pursuant to conversion allowed by Ord. #5722-95. After conversion, Office = 635,680 SF GFA. -2- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN. PREVIOUS D:O. CHANGE AND DATE" ' Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA NIA NIA Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) Type of dwelling units office development on Multi-family # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) 81,120 SF GFA 150,000 SF GFA None # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations Hotel/Motel # Rental Units Proposed amendment will allow office development on -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) additional parcel (Parcel 6) to factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial development to convert to hotel. # Parking Spaces be converted to hotel # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, N/A N/A N/A easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations -4- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (cont/i-,ijed TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOuSD.O. CHANGE AND DATE Open Space Acreage No change proposed (All natural and Site locational changes vegetated non Type of open space impervious surfaces)(2) D.O. conditions ADA representations Preservation, Buffer or Acreage No change proposed Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 10/11/0011:23 AM d-1 37413.95209 #223881 v1- Park Place DRI/Sub Dev Cht 2000 -5- PARK PLACE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 2001 Revised January 2002 PREPARED FOR: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 PREPARED BY: fly. ENGINEFRING'ASSOMTES, INC. 4921 Memorial Highway ,Qne Mem©rial Center, Suite 300 Tampa'; lorida 33634 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................. ............................... 1 II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT ............................................................................. 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ....................................................................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - PARK PLACE OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT F - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS ' I. INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via DRI Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91, 5722-95 and 6107-96) and Chapter 380.06 (18) F.S., and in conformance with Form RPM-BSP ' Annual Report-1. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Council (TBRC), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 9/1/2000 to 9/1/2001 Month/DayNear Month/DayNear Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Name of DRI Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer - Name: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL . Company Name Address: 21 Park Place Boulevard North Street Location Clearwater, FL 34606 City, State, Zip Code 1. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. EXHIBIT A SHOULD ALSO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS IF APPLICABLE: A. DESCRIBE CHANGES IN THE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR PHASING FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AND FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS; B. STATE ANY KNOWN INCREMENTAL DRI APPLICATIONS FOR I 0:\ADMIN\2002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONEOI CP.doc ' DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OR REQUESTS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION THAT WERE FILED IN THE REPORTING YEAR AND TO BE FILED DURING THE NEXT YEAR; ' C. ATTACH A COPY OF ANY NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER OR THE SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF AN ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT WAS RECORDED BY THE DEVELOPER PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 380.06 (15) (F), F.S. The approved plan of development was amended by Ordinance 6678-01 of the City of Clearwater. A copy of this amendment is included as Exhibit A. ' 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING ' LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT . ' No change in local jurisdiction occurred during this reporting year. ' 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. During the reporting year changes occurred to The Amended Master Development Site Plan (MAP H). The revised Map H is included in this report as EXHIBIT B. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ' PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE.- , Please see EXHIBIT C of this report. ' 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. 2 0:\ADMIN\2002\Proj ects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONEO 1 CP. doc ' To the best of our knowledga no tract Ownership has been transferred or ' changed. See Exhibit D for complete property ownership information. 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE ' PLAN AND MAP. To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. i 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. 1 Please see EXHIBIT E, PERMIT INFORMATION, for a summary list of permit and approval information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. A list summarizing each Development Order condition and the developer's compliance with each condition is attached as EXHIBIT F, COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued on February 2001 on the 3 0:\ADM1N\2002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doe 85,000 sf office building located on Parcel 8. This certificate has since expired and requires compliance to conditions. Other than that, we have no ' specific knowledge of additional plans being prepared or which may be submitted during the forthcoming reporting year for the remaining undeveloped portion of the DRI. and: ' a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits .... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report. th On April 6 2001, approval was granted for an 85,000 square foot office building in Parcel 6. and: a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year. No trade-off mechanisms were used by- Park Place developers during this reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE ' WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of ' Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Council, the State Department of Community Affairs and the Southwest Florida Water Management District on January 14, ' 2002. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have been sent a copy of this report. Person completing the questionnaire: Chris Papandreas, AICP Title: Senior Planner/Proiect Manager King Engineering Associates, Inc. t Representing: Bausch & Lomb Surgical 0:\ADMIN\2002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc III. EXHIBITS ' E hibit A Amend D l t O de t O di 6678 01 x - eve opmen r r men r nance - ' Exhibit B - Revised Map H, Master Development Plan Exhibit C - Summary of Development Activity ' Exhibit D - Park Place DRI Ownership ' Exhibit E - Permit Information Exhibit F - Compliance With Development Order Conditions 1 1 5 0:\ADMM002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc EXHIBIT A Summary of Development Order Changes ' EXHIBIT A ' SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 99.1 acres of commercial and office development with 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail uses. To annex the project into the City, the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance No. 3287-83. Ordinance No. 5142-91 subsequently amended the Development Order and Conceptual Plan to provide 200,000sf of industrial use, a maximum floor area ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change to the project phasing, extension of build-out date and a change in the timing of payment for transportation costs. Ordinance 5722-95 further amended the Order by changing development phasing to one phase, decreasing office space, extending the build-out date to the year 2000, and adding a conversion factor to allow for multi-family residential development along with the conversion of either office or industrial to multi-family. Amendments to the Park Place development order were approved by the City as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, ' 1996. This amendment provided the land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. Ordinance 6678-01 approved in 2001 amended the Development Order as shown in the table below. The current project components are as follows: Retail Commercial 81,020 81,120 404,639 200,000 390 Existing Approved / Under Construction Proposed Maximum Office 222,460 Industrial 100,000 Residential 390 85,000* *Site Plan approval, 2001 Land use trade-off rates for Parcel 6 were established to allow multi-family or hotel use to occur on- site. The build-out date for the development order was extended to 2003. Please see EXHIBIT B of this Annual Report for the adopted MAP H, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 0:\ADMIN\2002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc . ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS ' AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ' ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; REDUCING APPROVED OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE. CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. 1 WHEREAS, on September 1; 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 320543 (the "Development Order') which ordinance. constitutes a development order for Panic Place, a development of regional impact,. affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and ' WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 32137-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3283.7-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5112-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and "HEREAS, on - January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted. Ordinance ' No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. ' 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, ,filed an application entitled "'Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved ' Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes." (the "NOPC') with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and Ordinance No. 6678-01 0 ' WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached -hereto and incorriorated herein for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 (collectively, the "Proposed Changes' ); and ' WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and ' WHEREAS, certain. of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation,, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380,, Florida Statutes, is authorized and ' empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRls; sand WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have.been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. r BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: r Section 1. Introduction -This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Sstion 2. Findings - The City Commission having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the ' general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the followir.g findings of fact: ' A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-85, and 6107-96, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. r 2 Ordinance No. 6678-01 1 ' B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 6 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following . amendments to the Development Order. 1. Reducing approved office and retail space; 2. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion ' of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and 3. Extending the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. G. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. ' 1). The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of. critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create ' additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law -The City Commission having made the ,_ above finding, of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: r A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the .local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map ' H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. ' C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional 3 Ordinance No. 6678-01 r. ' impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the ' Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. I=. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 963.3 Florida. Statutes, 167(8), except to the extent that specific rights and protections are ' limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F'. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. ' G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and ' interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to-the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclu,cions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B attached hereto and incorporated, herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." ' B. Section 4.C..of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for 390 multi-family dwelling units and a ' total maximum floor area of 4,4 2g 68 759 square feet, comprised. of a maximum ;95•, QO 404. 39 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum ' 490, =_§J,120 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factors set forth, in Subsection 4.A.A. The permitted I maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. 4 Ordinance No. 6678-01 1 C. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is. amended to add the ' following: Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to either (1) 2.4 multi-family units or (ii) 2.44 hotel rooms are hereby established for the office area shown as Parcel 6 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following ' table: LAND USE TRADE-OFF RATES PARCELS 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.4 Multi-Family Units 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.44 Hotel Rooms Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel6 shall be limited as follows: 9 ' I office 0* 100,000* Multi-Family 0*' 111 ** Hotel OR* 185*** • square feet of Poor area " units '•' rooms D. The buildout date is hereby extended to December 31, 2003. E. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments. do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. F. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. G. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. S Ordinance No. 0678-01 I?. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof ' to the TBRPC and the DCA. I. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in ' the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.08, Florida Statutes. ' 1??tion 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. ' PASSED ON FIRST READING January 18, 2001 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED February 1, 2001 Bri n ungs ' Mayor - Co missioner ' Approved as to form: Attest: 1 Leslie K Dougal .: ides Assistant City Attorney Cyn is Goudeau City Clerk 6 Ordinance No. 6678-01 1 t EXHIBIT °A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North fight-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-cf-way line, S 89°46'01" W. 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29*46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 59£I.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence, S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 "04'04" E. 28.15 feet; thence! along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E. 11.493 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point cn the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of. U.S. Highway 19, N 89°5449" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Secti,on 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest comer of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said W:st right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lioveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. 7 EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 8 t t EXHIBIT B . Revised Map H Master Development Plan DREW STREET PAR'CE'L I R If_LJ fArTllinrn?,. + wu T nwv.rrn)HL PARCEL 3 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. TW ?u?s-f?wr ou: patL . EXISGNC ACCESS rn 00 NATURAL W AREA t OFFICE p?o PARCEL 2 82,179 SF OFFICE PARCEL 8 101.900 SF 0 MULTI-FAMILY Min II u%m PARCEL 4 "r.5mucm 156 D.U. o) Um,oo sr onlrq . ? Irs? utcn-r?t? uu, mr) Q COMMERICAL (RCTAA.) Q PARCEL S PARCEL 6 5 5, 2 78 SF (12PAW a WF= cmc,Np PARCEL 7 F lASon v oar ON 220, 560 F DUMERC/A PAR 9 - r M?` , EXIST ' __ PLANr4E;D TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81020 SF ,120 SF EXISTING OFFICE 222,460 S 639 SF q ACCESS LL IN DUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 000 Sr lDo000SF IA F A P ? T 390 DV 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 5 282.179 SF 685,759 SF 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 3 C d ACCESS HUM& O(Ki? o .-. fti TQWOyNO Olf jQuatLp.11 . 2 ilm7 PWIltlo rr and IIEM? Ws1r NAl M WO W K MOAPM O Knit= To IIG414ANpm ?4APWfr' ?I???tA ? ?. tN1,m -MEROAL CA11RA?pL 3 cor Qaogr AA7FS ar laao PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 >A?A? ? A una a 0PUMUMT ,° NO'r uwr Nm?smuL cnniayan AS w to APWO'{y. aaw . p .-. aurvq? w nwm i t (IIJa v tlaCQi6) hum v p757rW, ?. "I"44•A06rMLU MAAENI Ma w Lwmm m ?Ahma 1 L e MA ? GULf-TO-BAY BOULEVARD r ?. uto s? 6 cmix a rw iowm uon sr 4D , olNlaP?t7,x C ftmu s OG Q cm ix pggO Ip 1p IR.U 11LV UWM wm?? V QF m COMMERICAL 25,842 SF t`uW',,,:, M. ° m AnTn?1.rNO?,,?,.„"n;,1? 6xw1 •? a . ` - e FLd1RDADEWON .? ,`"? DA oarmr g,u PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 EXHIBIT C Summary of Development Activity EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ' During the 200101 reporting Year, no construction was initiated. Site plan approval was granted for an 85,000 square foot office building on Parcel 6. r 0:\ADMIN\2002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONEOI CP.doc r EXHIBIT D Park Place DRI Ownership EXHIBIT D PARK PLACE DRI OWNERSHIP Parcel Parcel No. Property Owner 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P. 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 474 S. Northlake Boulevard Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche 3225 Aviation Avenue #700 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 5. 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 Stacy Glenborough 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 400 South El Camino Rio San Matio, California 94402 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 Park Place Land Ltd. Clinton International 3225 Aviation Avenue #700 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 Highwoods Properties Holdings 3111 W. Martin Luther King Boulevard #300 Tampa, Florida 33601 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 Alex-Arl Florida Company 901 Venetian Bay Blvd. Venice, FL 34292 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010 Clant, Inc. 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020 P.O. Box 916464 11C 17-29=16-66373-000-0030 Longwood, FL 37291 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 0:\ADMIN\2002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc 1 fl EXHIBIT E Permit Information EXHIBIT E PERMIT INFORMATION List of Development Approvals and Permits For Reporting Year Ending September 1, 2001 Approval/Permit - Agency . Status/Approval Date PARCEL 1 City of Clearwater August 2001 Modification of Existing Wastewater Manhole as Instructed by the City of Clearwater, in order to allow for sampling point to be installed PARCEL 1 State of Florida April 2001 Proposed State Department of Highway access Transportation connection Parcel 6 City of Clearwater April 6, 2001 Site Plan Approved 85,000 Sq. Ft Office 0:\ADM1N\2002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc EXHIBIT F Compliance With Development Order Conditions 1 EXHIBIT F COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER ' CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS ' All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments, as contained in the Park Place DRI Development Order (amended 11/221/96) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: r Conditions & Commitments Compliance SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and final Site Plans submitted All development activity must receive the for each phase and consistent with DRI appropriate City approval, consistent with the "Conceptual Plan". "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved via Ordinance No. 6107-96. AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. B. All development shall be consistent with ' applicable land development codes. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated to the City of Clearwater 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. constructed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. Developer has complied. All development activity is reviewed and approved by the City.of Clearwater at time of plan approval. Developer has complied Park. Place. Blvd. constructed and accepted by City. ' C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 sf (795,520sf office use, 150,000sf retail, 200,000sf industrial) subject to conversion factors. CC. Mass transit requirements. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. ' E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to the first Final Site. Plan approval after 1/19/95. Conversion factor utilized to allow 390 multi- family units. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. (Bus stop on Park Place Blvd. was constructed as part of apartment project). Access previously acquired. All developer commitments have been met. 0:\ADMIN\2002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc 1 0 0 Conditions & Commitments Compliance EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City 10' easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. Developer has complied. FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. Curb cut and median turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting year. 1. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain ' undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. ' L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. (Approved Grand Reserve Site Plan maintains aquatic lands) Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the SWFWMD have been issued permits for all land project drainage system. development activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. The individual contractors are being held responsible for compliance with permit conditions. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as needed. 0. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Proposed development complies by connecting Hampton Road to Park Place Blvd. To existing Drew St. and US 19 shopping with sidewalks. 0:WDMIN\2002\Projects\1255-012-000\Letters\STONEOI CP.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Conditions & Commitments Compliance R Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. S. T U V W X Y Z. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. Maintenance of on-site wells. Osprey nest has been relocated successfully and occupied by osprey. Developer has complied; a capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Well on Parcel 2 required rerouting to provide fresh water. Original well was drilled too deep. SWFWMD permit was issued and well repaired accordingly. N/A (City requirement) Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvement costs in accordance with the applicable revised Development Order conditions. 0:\ADMM002\Projects\ 1255-012-000\Letters\STONE01 CP.doc mil- I 1 .I Tampa Bay Xegional Planning Council Chair Robert A. "Bob" Rersteen Vice-Chair Jill Coins Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Scott Bach MannN Pumariega February 3, 2006 Mr. Nick Shackleton Carmel Commercial Group, Inc. 3250 Mary Street, 5'h Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Ms. Maura R. Minges Bausch & Lomb Incorporated One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Subject: DR[ #92 - Park Place, Annual Report Summary, RY 2004-05, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Shackleton and Ms. Minges: The above-referenced item will be considered at the February 13, 2006 meeting of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council which will be held at the Council offices at 10:00 a.m. A copy of the Council's Annual Report Summary and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative wish to attend. The Report includes a summary of approved entitlements, completed development, phasing schedule, and highlights of select Development Order requirements/conditions. The Council's overall determination of the project's consistency with the Development Order is identified in the final paragraph of the Report. Please note that any reported violation(s) of the Development Order could result in the temporary suspension of the development order, by the local government, until the project returns to compliance with all the Development Order terms and conditions. Permits would not be reviewed or issued until any suspension has been removed. If you have any questions regarding the Report or the DRI process, please call me at (727) 570-5151, ext. 29. Sincerely, John . Meyer Coordinator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: Mr.-MichaebDelk--? Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP D RB -17 20O6 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER 40oo Gatewap Centre Boulevard, Suite r oo • Pineffas Par( FL 33782 Phone: 727-570-5151 - Fax: 727-570-5118 • State Number: S 13-5 o66 • wwwtbrpc.org Consent Agenda 02/13/06 Agenda Item #3.F.4. AIR S Tampa Say,7l.egional Planning Council Annual Report Summary 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100, Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER RY 2004-05 On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended five times, with the latest occurring on January 15, 2004 (Ordinance No. 7215-03). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by 23 years (to December 31, 2008) based on the phasing consolidation. The Development Order duly expires on December 31, 2008. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is September 15` PROJECT STATUS As currently approved, the following represents the plan of development: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL,: (M F =Units). December 31, 2008 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 Development this Reporting Year: it appears that a net increase of 4,828 sq. ft. of commercial was constructed during the reporting period with the acknowledged demolition of the former 5,372 sq. ft. Key West Grill restaurant and subsequent replacement with 10,200 sq. ft. of restaurant/ commercial uses. Cumulative Development. the developer has completed 304,639 sq. ft. of office space, 100,000 sq. ft. of light industrial space, 85,948 sq. ft. of retail space and 390 multi-family residential units. Projected Development: no specific development activity has been identified for next year. SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS 1. The developer has identified continued compliance with mass transit requirements (Condition 4.CC.); stormwater runoff disposal (Condition 4.L.); and funding of transportation improvements (Conditions 4.E., 4.G. and 42.). 2. The developer has provided the City with a ten-foot easement for pedestrian ingress/egress in accordance with Condition 4.EE. The sidewalk has since been constructed. 3. The developer has previously indicated that the Park Place Boulevard road improvement, illustrated as Parcel "A" ("Exhibit B"/Ordinance 5722-95), has been completed in accordance with Condition 4.N.2. 4. The developer completed a capture-release program on December 6, 1991 for certain identified wildlife species, consistent with Condition 4.T. The developer has previously obtained a "Osprey Nest Relocation" permit from the agency now referred to as the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, consistent with Condition 4.S. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. DEVELOPERS OF RECORD A listing of the DRI property owners (by parcel) is provided in the table below. This Table has been updated based on best available information. Each of these property owners are responsible for fulfilling the obligations within the DRI. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 21 Park Place Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 34606 prepared and submitted the annual report. DEVELOPMENT ORDER COMPLIANCE The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. The City of Clearwater is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. PAR- MAX. FLOOR AREA°- CEL PARCEL NUMBER, ?Sq. Ft) PROPERTY OWNER 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010, 200,000 - Industrial Bausch & Lomb Surgical, 21 Park Place Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020, 156 MF Res. Units California State Teachers Retirement System, % Paradigm 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 234 MF Res, Units Tax Group, 3645 Ruffin Rd., Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92101 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 101,900 - Office* Park Place Land Ltd., c/o Carmel Commercial Group, 3250 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 100,000 - Office Mary Street, 5"' Floor, Coconut Grove, FL 33133 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 120,560 - Office Glenborough Fund VIII, 400 S. El Camino Rio, San Mateo, CA 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 49,906 - Retail 94402 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 82 179 - Office Highwoods/Florida Holdings, 3111 W. Martin Luther King , Blvd., #300, Tampa, FL 33607 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 5,372 - Retail/ KB Investment Holdings Ltd., c/o Boulder Venture, 2226 S.R. Restaurant 580, Clearwater, FL 33763 11,303 sq. ft. resta- 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010 urant on Lots 10A & 10B , 17-29-16-66373-000-0020 10B and 14,539 sq. 11C , 17-29-16-66373-000-0030 ft. of retail/ restaurant Clant Inc., Post Office Box 916464, Longwood, FL 32791 11D , 17-29-16-66373-000-0040 on Lots 11C, 11D& 11E , 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 11 E.. Further info is not available for sub- divided parcels. NOTES: * Ordinance No. 6107-96 granted approval for the construction of a hotel component of development (to a maximum of 224 rooms) for Lot 4 with a simultaneous reduction of office or retail. Council Agenda -........ .............. ..... www.tbrpe.org Tampa Bay.Xeglonal Planning Council 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd, Suite 100, Pinellas Park, FL 33782 February 13, 2006 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 10:00 a.m. *** THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC *** Please Silence All Electronic Devices During the Meeting Call to Order Invocation and Pledge Roll Call Voting Conflict Report Chairman Kersteen Mr. Michael Guju Recording Secretary Recording Secretary Please Speak Directly Into The Microphone For Recording Purposes. Approval of Minutes Sec/Treasurer Black Approve minutes from the January 9, 2006 meeting. (report attached). Staff contact: Lori Denman, ext. 17 2. Budget Committee Sec/Treasurer Black Approve Financial report for the period ending 12/31/05. (report attached). Staff contact: John Jacobsen, ext. 19 3. Consent Agenda Chairman Kersteen A. Budget and Contractual Tampa Bay 2006 Hurricane Guide and Public Education Program A key recommendation of the Regional Hurricane Forum held September 29, 2005 was a need for a re-evaluation of the hurricane public education program based on the unprecedented hurricane seasons of 2004 and 2005. Specifically, staff was asked to address the following: • Need for a more graphically interesting piece with a longer shelf life. • Need for greater promotion including cross promotion with radio and neighborhood papers. • Need for on-going "reminders" during hurricane season through press, television and radio. • Need for greater distribution at the local (government) level for seniors, special needs, transportation disadvantaged and low-income. • Need for a more comprehensive and effective program for Spanish- speaking community. In response, a request for proposals was sent to the major media outlets in the region. Excellent proposals were received from WFLA/Florida Communications Group and the St. Petersburg Times/WTSP. Presentations were made to County Emergency Management Directors at the meeting on January 10, 2006 and a consensus was reached to work with WFLA/Florida Communications Group in 2006. As in the past, -1- the cost of the annual guide will be passed on to the County agencies on a per copy basis. Action Recommended: Authorization for the Chairman to sign a partnership agreement with WFLA to design and print 1.23 million copies of a new Hurricane Guide for the Tampa Bay Region for an amount up to $60,000 in 2006 and for staff to negotiate possible extension through 2011 with WFLA. Staff contact: Betti Johnson, ext. 39 2. Economic Development District Funding After several years of being an unfunded district, the Council's Economic Development District (EDD) has been green lighted for planning funds form the Economic Development Administration (EDA). EDA will provide $53,500 in planning funds and the Council will have to match in a like amount. Action Recommended: Authorize staff to prepare the funding application and authorize the Chairman to execute the application and/or grant acceptance as applicable. Staff contact: Avera Wynne, ext. 30 or Patrick O'Neil, ext 31 B. Intergovernmental Coordination & Review (IC&R) Program 1. IC&R Reviews by Jurisdiction (report attached). 2. January 2006 IC&R Database (report attached). Action Recommended: None. Information Only. Staff contact: Jessica White, ext. 38 3. IC&R #001-06, Grand Cypress Apartments, Altman Development Corporation, SWFWMD ERP #43028017.001, Pasco County. (report attached.). 4. IC&R #002-06, Twin Rivers Flood Plain Compensation Bank, Gamble Creek, L.C., SWFWMD ERP #43022140.006, Manatee County (report attached). 5. IC&R #012-06, Quail Woods, Phase 2, Walker Development Corporation, SWFWMD ERP #43028237.001, Pasco County (report attached). Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff contact: Suzanne Cooper, ext. 32 C. DRI Development Order Reports (DOR) - None Staff Contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 D. DRI Development Order Amendment Reports (ROAR) 1. DRI # 139 - Tampa Technology Park (West), City of Tampa (report attached). 2. DRI # 203 - Beacon Woods East, Pasco County (report attached). 3. DRI # 236 - Riviera Dunes, City of Palmetto (report attached). 4. DRI # 243 - Mitchell Ranch Plaza, Pasco County (report attached). Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff Contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 -2- E. Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) Reports 1. DRI # 65 - Tampa Palms (Area #4), City of Tampa (report attached). 2. DRI # 118 - Tampa Cruise Ship Terminal, City of Tampa (report attached). 3. DRI # 209 - Apollo Beach (Phase II), Hillsborough County (report attached). 4. DRI # 233 - Connerton (Village Area #5), Pasco County (report attached). Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff Contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 F. Annual Report Summaries (ARS) 1. DRI # 66 - Tara, RY 2004-05, Manatee County (report attached). 2. DRI # 68 - Cargill Riverview Facility, RY 2004-05, Hillsborough County (report attached). 3. DRI # 77 - Heritage Pines, RY 2004-05, Pasco County (report attached). 4. DRI # 92 - Park Place, RY 2004-05, City of Clearwater (report attached). 5. DRI # 108 - Hidden River Corporate Park, RY 2004-05, City of Tampa (report attached). 6. DRI # 110 - Rocky Point Harbor, RYs 2002-05, City of Tampa (report attached). 7. DRI # 118 - Tampa Cruise Ship Terminal, RY 2004-05, City of Tampa (report attached). 8. DRI # 151 - Crosstown Center, RYs 2003-05, Hillsborough County (report attached). 9. DRI # 157 - Trinity Communities, RY 2004-05, Pasco & Pinellas Counties (report attached). 10. DRI # 158 - Tampa Bay Park of Commerce, RY 2004-05, City of Oldsmar & Pinellas County (report attached). 11. DRI # 166 - Wesley Chapel Lakes, RY 2004-05, Pasco County (report attached). 12. DRI # 174 - Bay Vista, RYs 2003-05, Pinellas County (report attached). 13. DRI # 202 - Unnamed Exclusive Golf & Country Club, RY 2004-05, Manatee County (re port attached). 14. DRI # 207 - Wolf Creek Branch, RY 2005-06, Hillsborough County (report attached). 15. DRI # 211 - Meadow Pointe, RY 2004-05, Pasco County (report attached). 16. DRI #217 - Harbour Island, RYs 2002-2005, City of Tampa (report attached). 17. DRI # 221 - Pinellas County Criminal Courts Complex, RY 2004-05, Pinellas County (re port attached). 18. DRI # 236 - Riviera Dunes, RY 2004-05, City of Palmetto (report attached). 19. DRI # 239 - River Club Park of Commerce, RY 2004-05, Manatee County (report attached). 20. DRI # 250 - Independence Park, RYs 2003-05, City of Tampa (report attached). Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff Contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 -3- G. DRI Status Report Information Only. (report attached). Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 H. Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments Reviewed 1. DCA # 06-1, Pinellas County (report attached). 2. DCA # 05-2, Pasco County (report attached). 3. DCA # 05-1, City of Zephyrhills (resort attached). 4. DCA # 05-2 (flea 04-2), City of Tampa (report attached). 5. DCA # 06-1CIE, City of Safety Harbor (report attached). 6. DCA # 06-1RB, City of St. Petersburg (report attached). Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff contact: Gerald Smelt, ext. 28 4. Item(s) Removed from Consent Agenda and Addendum Item(s) Council members shall notify Chairman of any items they wish to be pulled from the Consent Agenda. These items will be discussed and voted on separately after the remainder of the consent agenda is approved. 5. Review Item(s) or Any Other Item(s) for Discussion 6. A. Kelo vs New London Eminent Domain Supreme Court Decision Mike Sittig, Executive Director of the Florida League of Cities, will provide an overview of the recent Kelo vs New London Eminent Domain Supreme Court decision with extended focus on how local governments should prepare for the reaction from that decision. Additional Material: Senate Eminent Domain Report (report attached). B. House Joint Resolution 31 Providing there are no conflicting Legislative Committee Meetings in Tallahassee, Representative Everett Rice has tentatively accepted an invitation to speak regarding eminent domain and House Joint Resolution 31. Additional Material: Senate and House Eminent Domain Bills (report attached). Staff contact: Wren Krahl, ext. 22 7. Council Members' Comments - Chairman Kersteen 8. Program Reports A. Agency on Bay Management (ABM) - Mayor Mary Maloof, Chair The full Agency on Bay Management met on January 12`h. A summary of the meeting will be provided. The full Agency will meet again on March 91h. Items on the March agenda may include: Assessment of the Cargill Acidic water spill of September 2004 and potential mitigation measures; and the proposed permit for the discharge of pollutants into the Gulf of Mexico near the Fenholloway River. Staff contact: Suzanne Cooper, ext. 32 -4- B. Clearinghouse Review Committee (CRC) No report. The Clearinghouse Review Committee did not meet and no meeting is scheduled. Staff Contact: Avera Wynne, ext. 30 C. Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) The Tampa Bay LEPC met February 1, 2006. A recap of the meeting is attached. EPCRA Awareness Week was January 22-28 and the LEPC deeply appreciates the county and city commissions/councils which have supported this effort with proclamations. Staff met with the statewide RDSTF Exercise Support Committee to receive guidance on this year's round of exercises. A verbal report will be given at the meeting. Additional Material: LEPC Recap 2/1/06 Staff Contact: Bill Lofgren, ext. 33 D. Emergency Management Staff will provide a brief report. Staff Contact: Betti Johnson, ext. 39 E. Legislative Committee - Commissioner Deborah Kynes, Chair A brief report will be presented regarding the upcoming 2006 Legislative Session. Additional Material: Draft OPPAGA Resolution 2006-1 (report attached). Action Recommended: Approval of OPPAGA Resolution 2006-1 Staff contact: Wren Krahl, ext. 22 F. Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC) The Regional Planning Advisory Committee is scheduled to meet on February 3`d. Items on the agenda include: Sea Level Rise Project; Fiscal Impact Analysis Model; Hurricane Evacuation Study Update; and Legislative issues. No oral report is expected. Staff contact: Avera Wynne, ext. 30 G. Telework Tampa Bay - No Report. Staff contact: Jessica White, ext. 38 H. Economic Development Staff has completed a series of training sessions in Orlando on the Fiscal Impact Analysis Model (FIRM). The sessions are staggered to allow for data collection to populate proto- type models. Staff is currently finalizing models for Manatee County and Pinellas Park. Staff is now working on a schedule to inform and train local government and counties on how to populate their own model. This will be done with an informal "get to know you" session followed by two training sessions and possibly a third optional session, depending on progress. TBRPC is offering several different approaches to coordinate with the governments in order to populate a local model. The Council's Economic Development District has finally been green lighted for ongoing planning funding. This year's amount is expected to be $53,500 with an equal match by Council. Staff contact: Avera Wynne, ext. 30 or Patrick O'Neil, ext. 31 -5- I. Regional Domestic Security Task Force (RDSTF) - No Report Staff contact: Michael Spina, ext. 21 9. Other Council Reports 10. Executive/Budget Committee Report - Chairman Kersteen 11. Chairman's Report - Chairman Kersteen 12. Executive Director's Report - Manny Pumariega Adjournment Next Meeting: Monday, March 13, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Mark your calendars for the 14' Annual Future of the Region Awards Friday, March 31", 2006 at 11:45 a.m. Quorum Hotel, Tampa The Council, in accordance with its adopted rules ofprocedure, may only take action on matters not on the printed agenda involving the exercise ofagency discretion and policy-making upon a finding by the Council ofan emergency situation affecting thepublic's health, safety, and welfare. Council meetings are Public Meetings within the context of Section 286.011, Florida Statutes. Council meetings are not Public Hearings within the context of Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. The Chair has full discretion as to whether or not to recognize speakers other than Council members or staff, and is not required to recognize individuals to speak on issues before the Council. Public Hearings on issues before the Council are conducted by individual local governments, and are the proper forum for public comment. Please note that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at the above cited meeting or hearing, s/he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, s/he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be baser. Persons wishing to speak at a Council meeting are required to complete the form provided at the entrance to the meeting room. The form, after being completed, must be given to the Recording Secretary. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this meeting you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at 727-570-5151 within 3 working days of the meeting. -6- Tampa Say )Z egional Planning Council 4000 GatewaN Centre Blvd., suite ioo Pinellas Park, FL 33782 i 044J83048526 $0.379 7 ? o ? 06/27/2005 C- U) ? Mailed From 3;3?82'j >L4:) Mr. Michael Delk, Director City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 lrj& ?Il?ltlllllllft?i'i_11-Slit 1Y?111 9IIIII IIII III I It td I till{ It i It A n. Tampa Bay,Reyional Planning Council Cbair Vjce-C( air Commissioner Jane von Ilahmann Robert IZersteen June 22, 2005 Housing Trust Group Continental Plaza 3250 Mary Street, 5`' Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Subject. DR[ #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater Anniversary Month - September Dear Sir or Madam: SecretarN/Treasurer Executive Director Ji[[Coffins MannN Pumariega Chapter 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, (F.S.), requires the developer of an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) to submit an annual report to the local government, the regional planning agency, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and any additional identified agency(ies) on the date specified in the Development Order. Our records indicate that the anniversary month for your annual report is September. Please check your Development Order, as it may include information requirements in addition to those required by the DCA (see enclosed annual report format). The annual report should also identify activities completed for the reporting year and activities proposed for the coming year. Pursuant to Chapter 9J-2.0252, Florida Administrative Code, the DCA DRI Review Fee Rule (enclosed - see (6)), please submit a check for $250.00 made payable to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, along with the annual report. The check must include the DRI name and number for identification purposes. It is noted that Subsection 380.06(18), F.S., indicates that if the local government does not receive the annual report or receives notification that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the developer submit the report within 30 days. The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, lgc e? John M. Meyer DRI Coordinator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: Mr. Michael Delk Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP JUN 2 8 2M i I PLANNING t, DEVELOPMENT SEFWICES i 40oo GatewaN Centre Boulevard, Suite r oo • Pine((as Park FL 33782 Phone: 727-S 70-S I S I - Fax: 727-S70-51i8 • State Number: 513-5o66 • wwwtbrpc.org 10 04 Government Organization of t? e Year - Tampa BaN Business Journa( 4 M 8 -11 w Tampa Bay Reglonal Planning Council Consent Agenda Agenda Item #3.F. 12/10/01 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES (ARS) 1. DRI # 66 - Tara, RY 2000-01, Manatee County 2. DRI #135 - Cypress Lakes, RY 2000-01, City of Oldsmar 3. DRI #139 - Tampa Technology Park, RY 2000-01, City of Tampa 4. DRI #177 - Rubin ICOT Center, RY 2000-01, City of Largo 5. DRI #202 - Unnamed Exclusive Golf & Country Club, RY 2000-01, Manatee County Staff Contact: John Meyer, ext. 255 Attachments: Respective Annual Report Summaries Recommended Action: Approval of staff reports Qati`? Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Consent Agenda 12/10/01 ARX S Agenda Item #3.F.1 Annual Report Summary, 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #66 - TARA MANATEE COUNTY RY 2000-01 On November 13, 1980, Manatee County granted a Development Order to Tara, Ltd., for the above- referenced DRI, a 1,137-acre, multi-use development located southwest of the State Road 70/I-75 intersection in Manatee County. The development was approved to contain: 4,040 dwelling units; a 54,000 sq. ft. service center; a 125,000 sq. ft. community shopping mall; a 50,000 sq. ft. commercial service plaza; an 18-hole golf course; a restaurant; an auto service station; and a 150-unit motel. Buildout of the three phases was scheduled to occur in 1985, 1990 and 1995, respectively. The Development Order has been amended a total of five times, the latest occurring on August 10, 2001 (Ordinance No. 01-44). The amendments have cumulatively approved: a postponement for the siting of an elevated water tower; modifications of the project entitlements and phasing schedule; relocated commercial use from the west side to the east side of Tara Boulevard; extensions of the Phases II and III buildout dates as well as the Development Order expiration date; identified the transportation improvement requirements associated with the latter phases; and a requirement to initiate a transportation monitoring program in 2003. The Development Order expires on November 13, 2007. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is November 13tH The revised phasing schedule is as follows: MUSE BUILLIOUT RESIDENTIAL (Units): RETAIL OR OFFICE (S q. Ft: I 1980-1994 719 84,901 II 1995-2003 299 17,700 III 1996-2007 1,701 258,899 TOTAL 2,719 361,500 *NOTE: Residential units represent any combination of single family and multi-family units. The developer is authorized to construct a 150-room Hotel in lieu of 70,000 sq. ft. of commercial space. Development this Reporting Year: The developer has completed 325 residential units and the Tara Preserve Golf Course and clubhouse during the reporting year. In addition, 184 dwelling units remain under construction. Cumulative Development: a total of 1,354 dwelling units, 103,001 sq. ft. of commercial space, 8,000 sq. ft. of office space and the golf course have all been developed to date. In addition, the Tara Boulevard extension has been completed. Projected Development: The developer anticipates the following development activities during the next reporting year: residential development within Phases II-E, II-F, III-B, III-H, III-I, III-J, III-N, III-O, III-P & III-Q; completion of infrastructure support Phases III-D, G, J and K; construction of a 15,007 sq. ft. commercial building in Phase III-Y; and construct the Tara Boulevard/S.R. 70 intersection improvements. The developer has indicated that the water quality analysis "Construction Phase Monitoring" has been performed and provided to the appropriate review agencies. 2. The developer has dedicated a child oriented park site to Manatee County prior to December 31, 1997, as required. 3. Condition 7.E. describes the transportation improvements required prior to Final Site Plan approval for development which generates beyond 813 p.m. peak hour trips. Based on the 768 p.m. peak hour trips identified in association with this reporting year, it is anticipated that this threshold will be exceeded during the next reporting year. Consistency with this Condition shall be addressed in the next Annual Report. 4. Revised Condition 7.F. requires the developer to initiate annual traffic monitoring in 2003. In accordance with Condition 8.D.(1), the developer has provided the average daily trips for the identified intersections: S.R. 70/west of U.S. 301 (28,500 trips); S.R. 70/U.S. 301 to Braden River (29,000 trips); S.R. 70/Braden River to I-75 (31,500 trips); S.R. 70/east of I-75 to end of 4lanes (20,500 trips); Tara Boulevard @ S.R. 70 (7,768 total trips/703 p.m. peak hour). The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. Tara-Manatee, Inc., 2666 Airport Road South, Naples, FL 33962, remains the entity responsible for adhering to the conditions of the Development Order. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. Manatee County is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. Tampa Say,R.egional Planning Council Consent Agenda 12/10/01 Anix S Agenda Item #3.F.2. Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #135 - CYPRESS LAKES CITY OF OLDSMAR RY 2000-01 On July 14, 1987, the Oldsmar City Council granted a Development Order (Resolution No. 87-15) to the Milford Corporation for a 1,182-acre, multi-use development located along the north side of Tampa Road (S.R. 584) between the Forest Lakes and Tampa Bay Park of Commerce DRIB, west of the Pinellas/Hillsborough County line. This three-phase project had originally been approved for: 3,900 residential units, 676,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of commercial space, 1.25 million sq. ft. of office space and 250 hotel rooms. The Development Order has been amended a total of six times, the latest occurring on June 15, 1999 (Resolution 99-16). The amendments have cumulatively: recognized the deletion of the northern 742 acres of the site conveyed to Pinellas County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District as part of the Brooker Creek Preserve in August, 1992; added a 10.57-acre parcel for use as a Walmart retail facility; and extended the completion date for the required transportation improvement by a period of two years, four months and 29 days (to October 31, 2001). The Development Order expires on July 14, 2009. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is June 6"'. The following summarizes the currentl -a roved entitlements for the project: ;RESIDENTIAL PARISH & Single-Family Multi-Family OFFICE COMMERCIAL HOTEL SCHOOL (#) (#) "(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Rooms) (Acres) 250 250 250,000 T 250,000 125 49 NOTE: The developer is not bound to the aforementioned development parameters. The developer may elect to construct any mixture of land uses that do not produce more than 17,330 off-site daily vehicle trips or 1,736 off-site p.m. peak hour trips. Development this Reporting Year: Pinellas County has commenced construction of the east/west road and the developer has commenced construction on a 31.35-acre/209,000 sq. ft. commercial parcel (Wal-Mart Super Center). Cumulative Development: construction of 10.97 acres of commercial development has been completed (2,992 sq. ft. 7-Eleven, 6,608 sq. ft. Discount Auto Parts store, 11,200 sq. ft. Eckerd Drug Store & and an additional 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store), a 5.2-acre/60,950 sq. ft. ice-skating rink, 288 single-family and 80 multi-family homes, and a 820-student elementary school. Exclusive of the 742-acre land transaction previously referenced, the developer has cumulatively sold a total of 435.78 acres of land. A map depicting the locations of these parcels was included with the annual report as "Exhibit C." Projected Development. Pinellas County is scheduled to complete the East/West Road during the next reporting period. In addition, the developer anticipates initiating construction of a 3,880 sq. ft. Steak & Shake restaurant as well as 17,320 sq. ft. of office development. 1. The developer previously submitted a Wetland/Lake Management Plan, consistent with Conditions IV.D.2.a. and IV.D.3. 2. Traffic estimates were provided with the annual report as required by Condition III.K.6. Two separate estimate studies were prepared by different consultants indicating that the project will be below the approved 1,736 external p.m. peak hour trips. However, one of the studies estimates that the project will generate 18,970 off-site daily trips, which is in excess of the 17,330 daily trips approved in the Development Order. A copy of both these studies are appended to this Annual Report Summary. 3. Condition IV.C.4.b.4(i)b) identifies the construction schedule for the two-lane extension from the Forest Lakes Blvd./S.R. 584 intersection to Race Track Road - commencement by August 27, 2000 and completion by October 31, 2001. The developer has indicated that this improvement is currently under construction by Pinellas County. In the event this improvement is delayed beyond one year, Condition IV.C.4.b.4(i)c) requires the developer to submit a NOPC application to address such delay(s). The improvement has also been referred to as the "Interim Improvement Design Facility" and the "east/west roadway." 4. Condition IV.C.4.b.4(i)c)(2) (Page 17) requires the developer to design Pine Avenue as a four- lane divided roadway as an extension of Linebaugh Avenue from the existing western terminus to S.R. 584. The developer was solely responsible for construction of the western two lanes of this facility, with the eastern two lanes to be constructed by "entities other than the developer." This improvement has been previously completed. 5. The developer is required to conduct biennial monitoring of mitigation areas and littoral shelves (Condition IV.D.5.); and surface water quality monitoring (revised Condition IV.E.4.). Hydroperiod monitoring shall be conducted consistent with permitting requirements as stated in Condition IV.D.6. The developer has stated that the monitoring continues in accordance with these conditions. The developer has provided correspondences from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection indicating that the monitoring of the Mitigation Sites 1, 2 and 3 were successful and that monitoring of these sites will no longer be required. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. The Milford Corporation, 3870 Tampa Road, Suite D, Oldsmar, FL 34677 is the firm responsible for adhering to the conditions of the Development Order. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order with the exception of the issue identified in Summary of Development Order Condition #2, above. The City of Oldsmar is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. REPA2ED 8 y S? N FOR `fib' C 1T°9 oro ©L-Ly Cypress Lakes DRI - Trip Generation Analysis TTE Daily PM Peak Hour Trips Land Use LUC Size Units Trips In Out T tal Single Family Res. I 210 137 D_U. Single Family Res. 210 79 D.U. Single Family Res. 210 72 D.U. Sub-Total 288 O.U. 2,743 178 100 278 Townhome 230 80 D.U. 538 34 17 51 Discount Auto Parts 843 6,606 Sq. Ft. 384 18 19 37 Eckerds Drugs w/drive thru 881 11,200 Sq. Ft. 987 57 59 X16 Tampa Bay Skating Academy" 60,950 Sq. Ft. 173 8 9 17 Wal-Mart Super Center 813 209,000 Sq. Ft. 10,503 391 407 798 City of Oldsmar Park 411 10 Acres 16 1 0 1 Oldsmar Fire Stations 20 Empl. 103 3 3 '6 7-11 Convenience Store w/gas 853 2,992 Sq. Ft. 2,530 91 91 },81 Forest Lakes Elementary School 520 760 Students 775 9 11 20 Steak and Shake fast food sit 834 3,880 Sq. Ft. 1,925 66 64 1.30 down rest. W/drive thru Multi-Family (Apts.) 220 270 D.U. 1,752 110 54 1165 Cypress Lakes West Office 710 36,401 Sq. Ft. 611 20 100 120 Cypress Lakes East Office 710 21,200 Sq. Ft. 403 18 86 1`03 Convenience Store w/gas 853 3,000 Sq. Ft. 2,537 91 91 182 Total Trips Generated 25,982 1,096 1,110 , O6 In ternal (15%) 3,897 164 167 31 External 22,084 932 944 ,575 L Pass-By 3,114 145 145 Z90 Net External 18,970 787 799 ,5 86 l 'from traffic study submitted to City of Oldsmar Pass-by capture determination Pass-by % Pass-by trips Wal-Mart Super Center 31 3,256 121 126 247 Eckerds Drugs w/drive thru 74 731 42 44 86 7-11 Convenience Store w/gas 74 1,872 67 67 134 Convenience Store w/gas 74 1,877 67 67 135 Total 7,736 298 305 603 Limit Pass-by to 10% of SR 584 traffic Existing traffic 31,141 ?,896 10% 3,114 i 290 i Source: RS&H Date: 8/23/01 1:1CHAPMANITBRPC1Cypress LakesgCypress Lakes Trip Gen.xls]Rev ised '01 =li?ui'?? 'p 07?y _,?f.L NS'Ji8 EW BGRNES GTKINSZN 727 726 DOES 2001.09-31 11,19 #1E5 ?.OEi09 ilr. Dale Bleakley August 29, 2001 Page 2 TABLE I ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION OF APPROVED. DEVELOPMENT USE LAND S1 Y _TRIP DAILY EXTERNAL PM PM PM , RATE : TRIPS TRIP RATE TRIPS' EXTERNAL. Offioe, 60,500 11.22/1,000: 679 I 611, 1.46/1000s:f 88 79 Retail. 235,097. 50.12/1000: • ; • 1.1,783 '10,605. 4.7/1,000s.f. 1',105.' 994 s.f. s.f. Sin le-Family 285 DU 9.55/DU ....2,722 1769 1.01/Dti 288 187 Townhomes• 80 DU .6.47/DU .. 518 336.. .63/DU. ! .5.0 '33• Church 51,546 9.12/1,000s:f 470. 400.... 0.66/1'000 .34 .29 s.f. s.f: . TBSA Ice :. 60,950 2.84/1,000 s.f. 173 147-. • .28/•1,000 17 1.4. Rink City Park 10 Acres 1.6/acre . .16 14 : 0 1/acre . Fire. Station 20 5.15/enipl. 103: 88 .. 0.3/empl.:' 6. ' . .5. employe a cs School* 300 .1.09//student" 327 0 015/student S 0 students School 520 .. • 1.09/student 567 567- .01:5/student. .:. .8 . • 8. students i TOTAL 17;358: 14,537.. 19602. 1,350 1nternaictarnal split is 100,V90% for office and retail, 35%/65% for'residcntlal, l$%/85% for hotel and other.-. Retail is 209,225 Wahnact, 13,000 s_f. Eckerds, 6,00(1.s.f Discount Auto Patti, 2,992 91, 7-11, 3,880 s.f; Sttak k Shake.. '• *Per approved 1993 tnuaportatior. analyzie 300 students aie:100•/i internal. I have also attached Section 380.06 (19)(b)(15) which states that less than a 15%'increase in exi6rnal trips is not considered a substantial deviation. With 11350 PM peak hour external trips, there is a 386 trip surplus.when compared to the Development order. This does not include a 15% incrrase which would be.allowed under Chapter 380.06 (1.9)(b)(15)*and therefore would. not be a substantial. deviation. Please contact,ine if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Tampa Bay,R.egional Planning Council Consent Agenda 12/10/01 ARX S Agenda Item #3.F.3. Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #139 - TAMPA TECHNOLOGY PARK CITY OF TAMPA RY 2000-01 On September 11, 1986, the Tampa City Council granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 9359-A) to Wood and Company for a three phase, 1,756-acre, multi-use development located in the northern quadrants of the Interstate 75/County Road 581 interchange in the City of Tampa. Only Phase I has received specific approval. The Development Order has been amended a total of 13 times, the latest occurring on October 4, 2001 (Ordinance No. 2001-219). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the transportation mitigation requirements; split the project into two distinct developments (Tampa Tech East and Tampa Tech West); authorized the inclusion of USAA into the DRI; modified the phasing entitlements, adopted and modified a land use trade-off mechanism; extended the phase buildout dates; allows a Tampa Tech Park East access road onto County Road 581 (Bruce B. Downs Blvd.); allows relocation of specific 40-acres of development; consolidation of Parcels "A-1 ", "J" and the "Ribbon Parcel" into a single parcel (the "Apex" Parcel) with transference of entitlements to this Parcel; extended the Phase I buildout date by five years (to December 31, 2005); and modified the Master Plan. The Development Order expires on March 29, 2011. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is July 0 The current development plan is as follows: PHASE I (Buildout:12131/2005) PHASE II' (Buildout: 12/31/2004) PHASE III' (Buildout: 12/31/2009) LAND USE Tampa Tech East (TTE) Tampa Tech West (TTW) (TTE $ TTW Combined) (TTE $ TTW Combined) TOTAL* Retail/Office(Sq. Ft.) 433,204 89,096 364,500 374,300 1,261,100' Hotel (Rooms) 192 288 360 360 1,200' Office (Sq. Ft.) 411,242 1,923,534 1,960,200 1,936,000 6,230,976' Lt. Industrial(Sq. Ft.) 2,302,518 2,355,038 3,789,720 3,731,340 12,178,616' Gov't Svcs. (Sq. Ft.) 58,000 02 0 0 58,000' 1. Through the utilization of the adopted land use equivalency matrix, the developer may elect to exchange land uses between any of the aforementioned uses, residential (maximum of 974 single-family or 1,558 multi-family units) or commercial mixed use (maximum 340,000 sq. ft.). Phases If & ITT have only received conceptual approval. Specific approval of these latter phases is contingent upon a revised transportation analysis. 2. Govemment Services of Tampa Technology Park West include a 68-acre High School and a 40-acre City Park. Development this Reporting Year. the developer for Tampa Tech Park West (TTW) identified that 81 single-family and 378 multi-family residential units, 21,600 sq. ft. of office space, a 68-acre high school/middle school and a 40-acre park are all under construction as of the reporting period. No development activity has been identified for Tampa Tech Park East (TTE). Cumulative Development: Aside from the aforementioned development identified for this reporting period, the developer has identified that 550,000 sq. ft. of office space has been completed for United States Automobile Association (USAA). Developers for the Tampa Tech Park East Annual Report previously indicated that 150 single-family homes have been constructed in addition to a 207,784 sq. ft. Intermedia Communications office building, a 83,000 sq. ft. movie theatre, and a 5,870 sq. ft. Ruby Tuesday restaurant. In addition, 27 single-family homes were previously under construction. Since cumulative development totals have not been provided for the entire DRI parcel, an accurate assessment of total development can not be provided and/or confirmed. Projected Development: no development activity has been identified for the next reporting year for "Tampa Tech West". Annual reports have not been submitted for all portions of the Tampa Tech Park (East and West) as required by Condition 4.B. 2. Condition 4.C. requires the annual assessment of Transportation Systems Management (TSM) effectiveness following the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for 300,000 square feet of office space. With the developer's acknowledged completion of 550,000 sq. ft. of office space for the United States Automobile Association, this Condition has been triggered. The developer has reported the "engagement of the USF Center for Urban Transportation Research to prepare the TSM." To date, the TBRPC has not received a copy of the TSM Plan nor has the developer reported the effectiveness of measures implemented. 3. The developer is required to submit biennial (every two years) traffic counts of project entrances. The developer asserts that the traffic counts were last provided with the traffic analysis prepared in conjunction with a Notice of Proposed Change application submitted in 1999. It would therefore be anticipated that traffic counts will be provided with the RY 2001-02 Annual Report. 4. The developer is currently authorized to generate up to 6,021 p.m. peak hour trips for Tampa Tech East (Phase I) and 6,389 p.m. peak hour trips for Tampa Tech West. Condition 4.17. requires the developer to report the feasibility of designating the hotel or other facility as a hurricane shelter. This Condition would not be applicable at this time for TTW based on the facilities constructed to date. 6. The developer is required to prepare and submit an emergency response and hazardous waste management plan (Condition 4.N.2). This Condition would not be applicable at this time since no user, producer or storer of hazardous waste is located on site, at this time, within TTW. 7. The status of the required post-construction surface water and groundwater quality monitoring results has not been described since February 5, 1998, as required by Condition 4.5. Results at that time indicated that three surface water parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, and lead) and two groundwater parameters (pH and chromium) exceeded state water quality guidelines. The following represents the latest known owners of the Tampa Tech East aud West parcels: SECTION" PARCEL OWNERSHIP All except the following Starwood Capital Group, Ltd. c/o Lochmere Development Group, TTE parcels. Inc., 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 1070, Tampa, FL 33607 "A-1" Norstar Tampa USA, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> "A-2" Centennial American, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> "B" CKT Development Company, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> T T h E ampa ec ast "C" Morrison Homes of Florida, Inc., <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> "F" Harrison Bennett Properties, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> "G", "H", "I" Highwoods Properties, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> "J" Apex Partners, LLC, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> "Ribbon" Apex Partners, LLC, <ADDRESS UNKNOWN> Lennar Homes, Inc., 151 Wymore Road, Suite 4000, Altamonte Tampa Tech Parcels Springs, FL 32714 West Unknown & USAA, 17200 Commerce Park Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33609 The project is ml proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. With the fragmented sale of various parcels and only one developer submitting an annual report (Starwood Capital Group), it is impossible to accurately assess the extent of compliance with the Development Order. As stated in Summary of Development Order Condition #1, above, it is imperative that a unified developer response be provided for the entire DRI parcel. In addition, the reporting developer did not address compliance with several required conditions, even though construction has been initiated. The City of Tampa is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. Tampa Bay ,Regional Planning Council Consent Agenda 12/10/01 ARIX S Agenda Item #3.F.4. Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #177 - RUBIN ICOT CENTER CITY OF LARGO RY 2000-01 On February 14, 1989, Pinellas County granted a Development Order (Ordinance 89-6) to R.F. Properties, Ltd. for a 243.71-acre, mixed-use development located along the north side of Ulmerton Road between 49`h Street North and U.S. 19 in central Pinellas County. The project had been under construction since 1983, prior to requesting a determination of DRI status in 1987. At that point, 84,167 square feet (sq. ft.) of commercial space, 250,397 sq. ft. of office space, 422,192 sq. ft. of industrial uses, and a 129-room hotel had been built or were under construction. The developer had initiated an Interim Development Agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs in order to continue construction while undergoing the DRI review process. The Development Order has been amended a total of three times, the latest occurring on September 26, 2000 (Ordinance R00-74). The amendments have cumulatively: exchanged land uses; incorporated conversion factors for exchanges between office and industrial land uses or commercial to office or industrial space; revised the transportation mitigation requirements; and extended the project buildout date by 14 years and Development Order expiration date by five years, nine months and one day, each to coincide with December 31, 2004. On September 19, 2000, the City of Largo adopted a series of Ordinances (No. 2000-86 through 2000-92, formally annexing the Rubin ICOT Center DRI into the City. The development is currently approved to consist of the following entitlements: ..PROJECT BUILDOUT INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL' OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) HOTEL _ (Rooms) December 31, 2004 899,948 146,817 589,187 129 Development this Reporting Year: a 44,950 sq. ft. industrial building was constructed for BIC during the reporting year. The parcel is Lot 12A (14433 Myerlake Circle). Cumulative Development: a total of 134,817 sq. ft. of retail space, 308,187 sq. ft. of office space, 824,716 sq. ft. of industrial space and 129 hotel rooms have been completed. Projected Development. a minor expansion of "The Living Room" (restaurant) is anticipated during the next reporting year. The parcel is Lots 2N and 3S (13707 58`h Street North). 1. Pursuant to Condition 4.1.1., the developer has indicated no record of, or request for, payment from Pinellas County for the fair-share contribution ($32,446) towards the Gateway/High Point Area Transportation Study. 2. The annual transportation monitoring was provided, as required by Condition 4.1.2. The current p.m. external traffic counts (2,049) are approximately 77.8 percent of those external trips approved in the 1994 Development Order Amendment (2,634). However, these calculations do not include an assumption of 32 percent (or 655 trips) defined as "cut- through" trips, as presented in "Origin/Destination license tag survey" provided in December of 1993. Pursuant to the latest amendment, revised Condition 4.1.3.3.A., the developer has reportedly paid the required $554,347 proportionate share payment to Pinellas County. 4. Condition 4.3.1.2. requires the developer to submit results of the semi-annual surface water quality monitoring of outfall points to the Cross Bayou Canal within the Annual Report. Results of monitoring events conducted on April 23, 2001 and August 2, 2001 have been provided. 5. Consistent with Conditions 4.2.4.1., 4.3.2.4. and 4.3.3.7. respectively, the developer provides tenants annual information pertaining to hurricane evacuation, hazardous waste storage and disposal, and energy management/conservation measures. A copy of the letters transmitting this information has been submitted within the Annual Report. It appears that the April 2, 2001 letter to hotel management, included in the Annual Report following Exhibit D, was based on an outdated Hurricane Evacuation Map. Pinellas County no longer utilizes Evacuation Zone numbers. In future (similar) correspondences to hotel management staff, the Evacuation Level (color) should be appropriately listed as green (rather than yellow) and the Evacuation Level as "C" (rather than "B"). Copies of the most recent Hurricane Evacuation Map for South Pinellas County can be obtained by contacting Pinellas County Emergency Management or the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. ICOT Center, Inc., 13630 58th Street North, Suite 110, Clearwater, FL 33760 is the firm responsible for adhering to the conditions of the Development Order. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. The City of Largo is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. Tampa Bay.R.egional Planning Council Consent Agenda 12/10/01 AIR S Agenda Item #3.F.5. Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX(727)570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #202 - UNNAMED EXCLUSIVE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB MANATEE COUNTY RY 2000-01 On May 15, 1984, Manatee County adopted a Master Development Order for Circle-N-Bar Ranch (DRI #101), in which the aforementioned project site was designated as Increment 2. On September 27, 1993, Woodlands Country Club Associates, Inc. was granted a Development Order (Ordinance 93-21) for the Unnamed Exclusive Golf and Country Club Development of Regional Impact, to be located in southern Manatee County, west of I-75 and south of the Braden River. The Development Order has been amended a total of four times, the latest occurring on April 24, 2001 (Ordinance 01-19). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the project acreage generally associated with DRI #154 - Arvida Corporate Park; extended the buildout date of the project to December 30, 2007 (a five year, 11 month and 30 day extension); extended the Development Order expiration date to July 8, 2012 (a three year, nine month and 11 day extension); acknowledged the developer's election to construct 200 additional residential units (Option 2); eliminated the Timber Lake Drive extension to the western property line; modified the frequency of traffic count monitoring to every third year until the earlier of a request by Manatee County or the generation of 75% of the approved p.m. peak hour trips; reduced the Country Club/Quality restaurant by 3,000 sq. ft. (to 32,000 sq. ft.) and eliminated the (formerly approved) 40,000 sq. ft. of commercial space; and modified the groundwater and surface water quality monitoring requirements. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is September 271' The revised phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT BUIL-DOUT RESIDENTIAL (Single Family Units) COUNTRY CLUB/RESTAURANT _ (Sq. Ft.) December 30, 2007 1,238 32,000 Development this Reporting Year: 90 residential units were constructed during the reporting year. In addition, a 15-acre tract was sold to Crescent Resources, Inc. for the Colonial Trace apartment project (sub-DRI). Cumulative Development: 780 residential units, 27 golf holes, and 8,600 sq. ft. of Country Club & Restaurant have all been constructed to date. Projected Development: the developer anticipates construction of 70 additional residential units during the next reporting period. The developer has previously submitted a copy of the Option 2 Trajjlc Study and the Master Drainage Plan, consistent with Conditions 4.B.1.a.2. and 4.D.(3), respectively. 2. The developer last provided traffic count data in conjunction with the RY 1998-99 Annual Report. Revised Condition IV.B.I.b. (Ordinance No. 99-55) requires traffic count monitoring be conducted every third year. This frequency of reporting has been approved until such time as the County believes more frequent monitoring will be necessary or at 75 percent of the approved p.m. peak hour trips, whichever occurs first. Per this Condition, monitoring results shall next be provided in conjunction with the RY 2001-02 Annual Report. The developer has previously submitted the following monitoring programs to all appropriate agencies: surface water [Condition 4.D.(2)] and ground water quality [Condition 4.D.(4)]; and sewer line monitoring [Condition 4.I.(2)]. The results of each continue to be provided to the County, as required. 4. The required wetland monitoring was conducted on October 9, 2001 and provided in the annual report, as required by Condition 4.D.(7). The photos (included in the Annual Report) illustrated the current condition of the planted littoral shelf located south of Parcels Y and Z. Wildlife observed included three common egrets, one Tri-Colored Heron and several fresh water fish, including large mouth bass and bluegill. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. Woodlands Country Club Associates, 3711 Cortez Road West, Bradenton, FL 34210 is the firm responsible for adhering to the conditions of the Development Order. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. Manatee County is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. ACTION AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER December 12, 2000 Meeting called to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE/RECONSIDERATION - None ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS Item #131 - 2217 South Lagoon Circle: John A. Shaw & Cathie A. Shaw - Owner/Applicant. Request annexation of 0.14 acre lot with Land Use Plan Amendment to RL, Residential Low Classification and Rezoning to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District at Lot 162, Clearwater Manor. ANX 00-08-22 ACTION - RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - 7:0 Item #B2 - (Cont' d from 11 /21/00) - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard: Thanh Phuoc & Kimtruc Thi Ngyuen/ Michael S. Caruso - Owner/Applicant. Request Flexible Development of a nightclub in the Commercial District, with a reduction in required number of parking spaces from 20 spaces to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at Bay View City Sub, Blk 8, Lots 8, 9, 10 & 1 /2 of vac alley on N less Rd. right-of-way on S. FL 00-08-33 ACTION - CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 20, 2001 - 7:0 Item #133 - (Cont' d from 11/21/00) - 7 Rockaway Street: Charalampos & Sevasti Alexiou (Kirk Construction) - Owner/Applicant. Request Flexible Development to reduce the front setback from 10 ft to 0 ft, reduce the rear setback from 10 ft to 0 ft and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces, reduce required number of handicap spaces from 6 to 1, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at Miller's Replat, Lots 2, 3 & vacated Beach Dr. on West. FL 00-07-29 ACTION - MOTION TO APPROVE - 3:3. RESULTING DENIAL BASED ON ROBERTS RULES. ITEM C - LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS Item #C 1 Park Place Development of"'Regional-Impact (DRI) amendment: Park Place Land, Ltd., c/o'Clinton International Group, Inc./Tim Johnson - Owner/. / Applicant. Propose change to approved DRI: 1) reduce approved office and retail space; 2) provide land use conversion factor for multi-family and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of DRI; and 3) extend DRI buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 at a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East. acd 1200 1 12/12/00 J ACT[ ON - RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - 6:0 ITEM D - LEVEL 2 APPLICATIONS Item #D1 - 3042 Geiger Court: Warren A. & Beth S. Wilson, III - Owner/Applicant, Request flexible development approval to reduce the side west setback from 15 feet to 6 feet and reduce rear setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, as part of a Residential Inf ill Project at Landmark Palms, Lot 11 and part of Lot 12. FL 00-10-36 ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 Item #D2 - 3164 San Pedro Street: Lawrence E. & B. Jane Boone - Owner/ Applicant. Request flexible development approval to reduce side west setback from 15 feet to 8.4 feet as part of a Residential Infill Project at Del Oro Estates, Lot 17. m nn-ln-qR ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 Item #D3 - 1931 Oak Ridge Ct: Joseph C. Patty, Jr., THE - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to reduce front south setback from 25 feet to 20 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project at Oak Ridge Court Estates, Lot 1 . FL 00-10-39 ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 Item #D4 - 3261 San Pedro Street John & Catherine M. Breen - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to reduce the east side setback from 15 feet to 13 feet and to reduce the south rear setback from 25 feet to 23 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project at Del Oro Groves, Lots 329-331. FL 00-10-41 ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 with CONDITION: addition be constructed with lentil floor design to protect and preserve oak tree. Item #D5 - 105 S. Myrtle Avenue: Warren LTD Business Records Management, Inc. - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval of a temporary records storage business in the Downtown District not to exceed one year, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at Tack and Warren, Lot 3. FL 00-10-48 ACTION -APPROVED - 7:0 with CONDITIONS: 1) records storage facility be approved on a temporary basis not to exceed one year, to expire 12/12/01; 2) all abandoned signage be removed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy; 3) document storage use prohibited from occupying upper floor; 4) all existing landscaping be maintained and pruned; 5) site limited to one 12 square-foot temporary window sign; 6) entry to stairway to upper floor be closed; 7) storage on constructed shelving be no more than 12 feet in height; 8) emergency lights over doors be in working order to illuminate exit signs; 9) exit sign without emergency acd1200 2 12/12/00 •,t TICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE O A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A Notice of Proposed Change is requested pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. The proposed change will amend Ordinance No. 3287-83, Ordinance No. 5142.91, Ordinance No. 5722-95 and Ordinance No. 6107-96. Applicant: Subject Property: Park Place Land, Wonalrolulp, o ' mton terrInc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. A portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 The Applicant is filing this Notice of Proposed Change Application to (1) reduce approved office and retail space; (2) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 and incorporated herein (Parcel "6") for multi-family and/or hotel uses; and (3) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER Community Development Board For Local Planning Agency Review Tuesday, December 12, 2000, at 1:00 p.m. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS, City Hall, 3rd Floor 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Additional information is available in the Planning and Development Department at the Municipal Services Building, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. Citizens may be heard or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Director or the City Clerk prior to or during the public hearing. Florida Statute 286.01505 states: Any person appealing a decision of this board must have a record of the proceedings to support such an appeal. A person taking an appeal will need to ensure that a verbatim record, including testimony and evidence, is made. The inclusion of this statement does not create or imply a right to appeal the decision to be made at this hearing if the right to an appeal does not exist as a matter of law. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/AAE City Clerk Ad: 11-25-00 ORDINANCE NO. -00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; REDUCING APPROVED OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE; PROVIDING A -CONVERSION .FACTOR FOR-MULTI-FAMILY AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to EXHIBIT "D" 0 0 the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRis; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, and 6107-96, is a valid final development order within the provisions of 2 0 • Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 6 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Reducing approved office and retail space; 2. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and - 3. Extending the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. 3 • • D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limi-ted.-or modified by the :Proposed Changes- to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, -Park'Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for 390 multi-family dwelling units and a total maximum floor area of 1,1T 145,52-0 685,759 square feet, comprised of a maximum 7950 404,639 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 4 0 • 150, = 81,120 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factors set forth in Subsection 4.A.A. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. C. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to either (i) 2.4 multi-family units or (ii) 2.44 hotel rooms are hereby established for the office area shown as Parcel 6 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: LAND USE TRADE-OFF RATES PARCEL 6 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT MAYBE CONVERTEDTO: F=., 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.4 Multi-Family Units 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.44 Hotel Rooms Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel6 shall be limited as follows: MINIMUM MA dmulm Office 0* 100,000* Multi-Family 0** ill** Hotel 0** 185*** * square feet of floor area ** units *'* rooms D. The buildout date is hereby extended to December 31, 2003. E. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. F. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. 5 i 0 G. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. H. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian Aungst Mayor - Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H 10/11/00 12:02 PM d-1 37413.95209 #103377 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE ORD 6 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. -00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. 0 0 EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. -00 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 0 0 Hospitals # Beds NIA NIA N/A -EXHIBIT "E PARK PLACE DR! SUBST'ti'NTI, ' DEVIATION DETERMiNATiON Ci-ilaRT ' TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY ` PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space N/A N/A N/A # Spectators # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) NIA N/A NIA Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations 0 0 PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (contifiued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) No change -0- 200,000 SF GFA (12119/91- Ord. #5142-91) # Employees Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage mined (year) N/A NIA N/A Water Withdrawal (Gal/day) Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross sq. ft.) 404,639 SF GFA 1,103,000 SF GFA 803,000 SF GFA (12119191-Ord. #5142-91) # Parking Spaces 795,520 SF GFA (1119195-Ord. #5722-95)' # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations 159,840 square feet of Office was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units pursuant to conversion allowed by Ord. #5722-95. After conversion, Office = 635,680 SF GFA. -2- n .0 PARK PI ACE DR! SU@STANTIAE DEVIATION,DET ERMiNATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOus D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA N/A N/A Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips ' D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) Type of dwelling units office development on Multi-family # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- i 0 PARK PLACE LORI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DcTtRfifiiFIATiON CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) 81,120 SF GFA 150,000 SF GFA None # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations Proposed amendment will allow -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Hotel/Motel # Rental Units office development on factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) additional parcel (Parcel 6) to development to convert to hotel. # Parking Spaces be converted to hotel # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, N/A N/A N/A easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations -4- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATIONCHART (ccrf/nued) TYPE OF LAND USE. CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE. Open Space Acreage No change proposed (All natural and Site locational changes vegetated non Type of open space impervious surfaces)IZI D.O. conditions ADA representations Preservation, Buffer or Acreage No change proposed Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 10/11/0011:23 AM d-1 37413.95209 #223881 v1- Park Place DRI/Sub Dev Cht 2000 40 -5- Clearwater ? DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE November 2, 2000 el 1-13- bD Updated as of 10131100 X9:30 a.m. Case: Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) amendment Owner(s): Park Place Land, Ltd., c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Applicant: Tim Johnson. Location: Generally between Drew Street and Gulf to Bay Boulevard, and U.S. Highway 19 (Frontage Road) and Hampton Road. Zoning: C, Commercial, IRT, Industrial Research and Technology, O, Office, and P, Preservation Districts. Atlas Page: 291A Request: Notification of Proposed Change to the approved DRI to: 1. Reduce approved office and retail space; 2. Provide a land use conversion factor for multifamily and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of the DRI; and 3. Extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31, 2003. Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended approval and it will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its December 12, 2000. COMMENTS: Tim Johnson represented the owners. Bill Johnson attended the meeting as a spectator. Mr. Tim Johnson stated that the office use, approved for parcel 6, may not get built. The request is to permit office, hotel or multi-family use on the site - based on a conversion factor whereby traffic numbers cannot increase. Setbacks, parking, and ISR will be required by the Community Development Code. The FAR and height are regulated by the approved DRI. 10:00 a.m. Case: FLS 00-10-66 - 703 Franklin Street (Club Moore) Owner/Applicant: Ewart Holdings. Location: 0.42 acres located on the north side of Franklin Street, approximately 150 feet west of Myrtle Avenue. Zoning: D, Downtown District. Atlas Page: 286B Request: Flexible Standard development approval of a deck expansion. Proposed Use: A 245 square foot deck addition to an existing nightclub. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: . The DRC recommended APPROVAL with the following comments: COMMENTS: 1. Need enclose dumpster (12 feet by 10 feet) or screen from Franklin Street prior to issuance of a DO; 2. Need a current, accurate survey (including all structures on site) prior to issuance of a DO; 3. That the deck will need to be ADA compliant. (Ted Henderson attended the meeting. He stated the ice machines will be moved inside with this proposal. He stated he has plans to expand the use in the future.) DRC draft agenda - 11/2/00 - Page 1 FAX MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER,, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX (727)562-4576 TO: r ) l 4 P_1?%1C.? FAX: J(oZ-??CC? FROM: DATE: 1 1 ) ° l MESSAGE: PTV- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 0ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 12/06/2000 12:33 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATEJIME 12/06 12:27 FAX N0./NAME 94620365 DURATION 00:05:43 PAGE(S) 11 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD 'I ma -J-6 1<5 O--t? P,v- p t Cle, arwal ° TO: *114N, TUhr\S- n , Sf FROM: 0' `GYIf ??k DATE: 1 Z 1 PAGES INCLUDING LUDING a Li C , ?-. V F- CIvJ THIS PAGE: FAX #: 1 ?Z - U 3 b FAX #: PHONE #: s. Z 1 U Updated as of 12/5/00 AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 Time: 1:00 p.m. Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Clearwater, Florida, 33756 (City Hall Commission Chambers) The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. Kindly refrain from using beepers, cellular telephones and other distracting devices during the meeting. Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a record of the proceedings to support such appeal. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Chair Figurski Vice-Chair Mazur Gildersleeve Johnson Moran Petersen Plisko City Staff A. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES: None B. CONTINUED ITEMS: 1. Case: ANX 00-08-22 - 2217 South Lagoon Circle Owner(s)/Applicant: John A. Shaw & Cathie A. Shaw. Location: 0.14 acres located on the south side of Lagoon Circle South; approximately 230 feet east of Belcher Road. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.14 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 1 2. Case: FL 00-08-33 - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Owner: Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen. Applicant: Michael S. Caruso. Location: 0.28 acres located on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 42 feet west of Meadow Lark Lane. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval of a nightclub within the Commercial District, with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 20 spaces to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A 2,132 square foot nightclub. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. 3. Case: FL 00-07-29 - 7 Rockaway Street Owner: Ypapanti and Sevasti Alexiou. Applicant: Kirk Construction. Location: 0.38 acres located on the north side of Rockaway Street, approximately 500 feet west of Mandalay Avenue. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (north) setback along Rockaway Street from 10 feet to zero feet, reduce the rear (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet, reduce the required number of parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use: A 3,487 square foot second-story addition to an existing restaurant. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. C. LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS: 1. Case: Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) amendment Owner(s): Park Place Land, Ltd., c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Applicant: Tim Johnson. Location: Generally between Drew Street and Gulf to Bay Boulevard, and U.S. Highway 19 (frontage road) and Hampton Road. Zoning: C, Commercial, IRT, Industrial Research and Technology, O, Office, and P, Preservation Districts. Request: Notification of Proposed Change to the approved DRI to: 1. Reduce approved office and retail space; 2. Provide a land use conversion factor for multi-family and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of the DRI; and 3. Extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31, 2003. Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner. CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 2 C? D. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS: • 1. Case: FL 00-10-36 - 3042 Geiger Court Owner(s)/Applicant: Warren and Beth Wilson. Location: 0.42 acres located on the north side of Geiger Court, approximately 500 feet east of Landmark Drive. Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (west) setback from 15 feet to six feet and reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 935 square foot, two-story addition to an existing 4,090 square foot, single-family dwelling. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. 2. Case: FL 00-10-38 - 3164 San Pedro Street Owner(s)/Applicant: Lawrence E. Boone. Location: 0.25 acres located on the north side of San Pedro Street, approximately 175 feet east of Madera Avenue. Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (west) setback from 15 feet to 8.4 feet as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 304 square foot addition (storage) to an existing 2,400 square foot single-family dwelling. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. 3. Case: FL 00-10-39 - 1931 Oak Ridge Court Owner: Joseph C. Patty, Jr. Applicant: Hugh Grant. Location: 0.53 acres located on the northeast corner of Oak Ridge Court and Sunset Point Road. Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 495 square foot (front loading) garage addition to an existing 4,526 square foot single-family dwelling (with side loading garage). Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. 4. Case: FL 00-10-41- 3261 San Pedro Street Owner/Applicant: John Breen. Location: 0.26 acres located on the south side of San Pedro Street, approximately 150 feet west of Maximo Avenue. Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side setback (east) from 15 feet to 13 feet and to reduce the rear setback (south) from 25 feet to 23 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 647 square foot addition to an existing 1,750 square foot single- family residence. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 3 • • 5. Case: FL 00-10-48 - 105 South Myrtle Avenue Owner: Glenn Warren. Applicant: Business Records Management Inc. Location: 0.68 acres located on the southeast corner of Park Street and Myrtle Avenue. Zoning: D, Downtown District. Request: Flexible Development approval of a temporary records storage business in the Downtown District not to exceed one year, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use: An 8,847 square foot records storage establishment within a 10,000 square foot building. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. 6. Case: FL 00-10-40 1426 McMullen Booth Road Owner/Applicant: La Canada Holding Company/James Rapp for Sunset Mercantile Limited Partnership. Location: 5.07 acres located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of SR 590. Zoning: IRT, Industrial Research Technology District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a self-storage business in the IRT District with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 174 spaces to 147 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (amendment to approved site plan - June 20, 2000 Community Development Board meeting). Proposed Use: A 123,000 square foot self-storage establishment. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. 7. Case: FL 00-10-37- 14 South Evergreen Avenue Owner: Dennis and Rebecca Dunn and John and Anna Boyce. Applicant: First Impressions. Location: 0.14 acres located at the northwest corner of Park Street and South Evergreen Avenue. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval of a light assembly establishment within the Commercial District with a reduction in required parking from six spaces to four spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A 1,600 square dental laboratory. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 4 • 8. Case: FL 00-10-47 - 1825 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Owner: Seydo Kurdi. Applicant: Amscot Corporation. Location: 0.30 acres located on the southeast corner of Virginia Avenue and Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District within a building which does not meet all the current land development regulations and is located within 500 feet of another problematic use, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: Check Cashing (problematic use) as part of a financial institution with tax service and currency exchange. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. 9. Case: FL 00-10-46 - 880, 900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue Owner(s): Jim Dan Incorporated, Jacinto Castellano & Elena Betes. Applicant: Florida Marine and Resort Developers, Inc. Location: 8.89 acres located on the west and east side of Osceola Avenue, west of Fort Harrison Avenue (south of Nicholson Street). Zoning: C, Commercial, MDR, Medium Density Residential District, P, Preservation, and T, Tourist Districts. Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet, reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to an emergency access lane) with a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A 140-unit, 100-foot condominium building, a 7,000 square foot restaurant, a 4,500 square foot office, a 2,000 square foot ship's store/marina office, a 112-wet slip marina. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. E. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS: • Approval of minutes from November 21, 2000 meeting • Annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases F. ADJOURNMENT S:IPlanning DepardneiitlCD Blagendas DRC & CDBICDBI2000V 2 Decernberlcdb agenda 12.12.00.doc CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 5 CDB Meeting Date: December 12, 2000 CDB Item #: C-1 CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 REPRESENTATIVE: Tim Johnson, Esq., Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. i LOCATION: Generally located between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Drew Street from Hampton Road to the U.S. 19 Frontage Road Legally described as a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. More particularly described in attached legal description. REQUEST: To amend the approved Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order through the Notification of Proposed Change process to: 1. Reduce approved office and retail space; 2. Provide a land use conversion factor for multifamily and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of the DRI; and 3. Extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31, 2003. SITE INFORMATION DRI SIZE: 99 acres DRI PROPERTY USES: Current Use: Retail, Office and Residential Proposed Use: Addition of multifamily and/or hotel use in Parcel 6 • • PLAN CATEGORY: Current Categories: Industrial Limited, Residential/Office/Retail, Residential/Office General, Commercial General and Preservation Proposed Category: Same ZONING DISTRICT: Current Districts: Industrial Research and Technology (IRT), Office (O), Commercial (C) and Preservation (P) Proposed Districts: Same EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Multifamily Residential, Retirement Residence, Nursing Home and Open Space South: Commercial East: Mobile Home Park, Single Family Residential West: Commercial DRI HISTORY: The DRI'ss development order was adopted by the Clearwater City Commission on September 1, 1983. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on October 20, 1983 to incorporate Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council recommendations. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on December 19, 1991 to provide 200,000 square feet for Industrial use and reduce Office use by 300,000 square feet; provide an F.A.R. for Industrial use; amending conditions based on phasing; amending the developer's payment schedule; and extending the buildout date by five years. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on January 19, 1995 to modify phasing; decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet, extending the buildout date by four years; adding a conversion factor for Office use to Multifamily Residential and adding a conversion factor for Industrial use to Office or Multifamily Residential; and modifying conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on November 21, 1996 adding a land use conversion factor to Parcel 4 for office and/or hotel development and reflecting a change in ownership. Park Place DRI 2000 • ANALYSIS • Introduction This Development of Regional Impact (DRI) amendment is requested by the property owner to provide additional development options for Parcel 6 including residential and hotel units, and extend the buildout date of the entire DRI to December 31, 2003. The Park Place DRI is built out with the exception of this parcel and the developers have fulfilled the development order as amended. The amendment also proposes to reduce the approved DRI square footage to reflect existing and planned proposed uses. The current approved land use square footage is as follows: Retail/Commercial - 150,000; Office - 635,680; Light Industrial - 200,000; and Multifamily - 390 dwelling units. Parcel 6 is currently planned with 100,000 square feet of office. The applicant has not resolved all outstanding issues with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council concerning the traffic impact analysis. However, the applicant has submitted additional information and may have all issues resolved by the December 12, 2000 Community Development Board meeting. 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City's Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: 2.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. 2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. 3.2.2 Policy - Commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of "strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major intersections. 5. 1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified Park Place DRI 2000 consistent with provisions of the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 5.5 Objective - All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. The proposed change will not require a Future Land Use Plan amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The Park Place DRI is a mixed use project with 985,680 square feet of approved uses and 390 dwelling units. This proposed amendment will decrease the overall approved uses of the DRI by 302,921 square feet (31 %) of the total potential development. The reduction of potential uses will decrease of the need for services such as potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste. However, the potential addition of residential units could impact the level of service of recreation facilities. These additional units may be subject to recreation/open space impact fees. The traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been reviewed by various agencies. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has identified issues with the traffic analysis, thus City staff has been unable to determine if the current level-of-service will be degraded. These issues are discussed later in this staff report. Due to the outstanding issues, it is not possible, as of this writing, to determine the consistency of the proposed DRI amendment with all applicable policies in the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. H. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The Future Land Use Map is not being amended, thus, there are not any applicable regulations from the Countywide Plan. M. CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) has determined that these proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes. A substantial deviation is defined by the Statutes as "any proposed change to a previously approved development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency." Several issues need to be clarified to the satisfaction of TBRPC before it can be determined if sufficient information has been supplied to rebut the presumption. These include: 1. Intersection Analyses, Truck Factor TBRPC has an issue with the truck factor of two percent used in the intersection analyses. This factor is a percentage of trucks over six wheels on the roadways. Park Place DRI 2000 C? J • 2. DRI Project Traffic as a percent of Intersection Capacity TBRPC has an issue with the calculation of the percentage of project traffic to the intersection capacity for the signalized movements. 3. Project Trip Distribution TBRPC has an issue with the basis of the project trip distribution primarily pertaining to mid-block dissipation of project traffic. 4. Project Transportation Impact Mitigation TBRPC requested additional information regarding transportation improvements required by the Development Order, the status of improvements, the developer's proportionate share and proportionate share payments made to date. The applicant has submitted a rebuttal to TBRPC. However, without these issues being resolved, the proposed DRI amendment currently is not consistent with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's recommendations. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The State's Comprehensive Plan policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: (16)(b)3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of living, working, shopping, and recreational activities. (18)(b)l. Provide incentives for developing land in a way that maximizes the uses of existing public facilities. (25)(b)5. Ensure that the transportation system provides maximum access to jobs and markets. The proposed DRI amendment is consistent with all applicable State Comprehensive Plan policies. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the outstanding issues related to traffic, the Planning Department cannot at this writing make a determination of consistency. Therefore, the Planning Department recommends CONTINUING this application pending the resolution of the outstanding issues with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. Park Place DRI 2000 • Submitted by: Gary Jones, Senior Planner Attachments: Applicant's Submittal to DCA DCA Letter FDOT Letter TBRPC Letter Applicant's Responses Location Map Park Place DRI Parcel Configuration • Park Place DRI 2000 Tampa Bay,7Zegtonal Flanning Council Chairman vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Commissioner Chris Hart Frederick T Reeves Mayor Pat Whitesel December 29, 2000 Mr. Kevin Smith Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 Executive Director Manny L. Pumariega Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater, RY 1999-2000 Annual Report Summary Dear Mr. Smith: The above-referenced item will be considered at the January 8, 2001 meeting of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council which will be held at the Council offices at 9:00 a.m. Please note that this item has been placed on the Consent Agenda for the meeting. A copy of the report and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative wish to attend. To staff's knowledge, no change in local government jurisdiction has occurred, no undeveloped land has been sold, no properties have been purchased or optioned adjacent to the original DRI and no changes in the plan of development or phasing have been made during the reporting period, unless specified in the annual report summary. A list of permits obtained, applied for or denied during the reporting period and confirmation of the required distribution of the annual report have been provided in the report, unless otherwise noted. Please refer to the last paragraph of the annual report summary for an assessment of consistency with the Development Order and for any additional information or clarifications needed. If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 570-5151, ext. 255. Enclosures cc: Robert Rutledge, King Engineering Cindy0g;r ,City?_oP&earwateri 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513.5066 http://www.tbrpc.org TampaSay.R.egional Planning Council Consent Agenda 01/08/01 Agenda Item #2.D.5 AIRS Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER RY 1999-2000 On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. The Development Order expires on September 1, 2003. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is September I". A Notice of Proposed Change was submitted October 11, 2000 requesting the following modifications of the Development Order: reductions of 234,041 sq. ft. of office space (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and 68,800 sq. ft. of retail space (to 81,120 sq. ft.); allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and further extend the project buildout date by an additional three years (to December 31, 2003). The proposal remains under review. Throush the amendment process, the Droiect has been downscaled to the following: PROJECT OFFICE INDUSTRIAL RETAIL RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT (Sq Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Multi-Family Units) 2000 635,680* 200,000* 150,000* 390 r - Development parameters are subject to change upon the developer exercising option to construct multi-family units or hotel rooms. Development this Reporting Year. The developer has initiated construction of a 84,268 sq. ft. office building during the reporting year. In addition, the cafeteria expansion was completed. Cumulative Development: the developer has completed 304,460'sq. ft. of office space, 100,000 sq. ft. of light industrial space, 82,020 sq. ft. of retail space and 390 multi-family residential units. Projected Development: although no specific development activity has been identified for the next reporting year, completion of the aforementioned 84,268 sq. ft. office building would be anticipated. 1. The developer has identified continued compliance with mass transit requirements (Condition 4.CC.); stormwater runoff disposal (Condition 4.L.); and funding of transportation improvements (Conditions 4.E., 4.G. and 42.). 2. Condition 4.EE. requires the developer to provide the City with a ten-foot easement for pedestrian ingress/egress prior to the issuance of any permits for Parcel 4. The developer has stated a sidewalk construction has been completed. The developer has previously verified that the Park Place Boulevard road improvement, illustrated as Parcel "A" ("Exhibit B"/Ordinance 5722-95), has been completed in accordance with Condition 4.N.2. 4. The developer completed a capture-release program on December 6, 1991, consistent with Condition 4.T. The developer has additionally obtained an "Osprey Nest Relocation" permit from the Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission in 1996, consistent with Condition 4.S. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. A revised listing of the DRI property owners (by parcel) is attached and provided as Table 1. These property owners are responsible for fulfilling the obligations of the DRI. Bausch & Lomb Optical, 21 Park Place Boulevard North, Clearwater, FL 34606 prepared and submitted the annual report. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. The City of Clearwater is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. TABLE 1 PAR- MAX. FLOOR AREA CEL PARCEL NUMBER (Sq. Ft.) PROPERTY OWNER Bausch & Lomb Surgical, 21 Park Place Blvd. N., Clearwater, 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010, 200,000 - Industrial FL 34606 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020, 156 MF Res. Units The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P., 474 S. Northlake 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 234 MF Res, Units Blvd., Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 000 - Retail' 60 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche, 3225 Aviation , Avenue #700, Coconut Grove, FL 33133 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 120,560 - Office Stacy Glenborough, 400 S. El Camino Rio, San Mateo, CA 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 120,000 - Office 94402 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 60,000 - Retail Highwoods Properties Holdings, 3111 W. Martin Luther King 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 124,860 - Office Blvd., #300, Tampa, FL 33601 Alex-Arl Florida Company, 901 Venetian Bay Blvd., Venice, 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 5,000 - Retail FL 34292 Other than: 10,000 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010, sq. ft. (all Lot 10) and 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020, 15,000 sq. ft. (all Lot 11C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030, 11) of retail space, Clant Inc., Post Office Box 916464, Longwood, FL 32791 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040, further information is 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 not available for subdivided parcels. NOTES: 1. Utilizing adopted Land Use Equivalency Matrix, the Developer has obtained approval to simultaneously reduce approved office space in exchange for 156 and 234 multi-family units respectively for Lots 2 & 3. (Ordinance No. 5722-95) 2. Ordinance No. 6107-96 granted approval for the construction of a hotel component of development (to a maximum of 224 rooms) for Lot 4 with a simultaneous reduction of office or retail. Select Year: 20 ..........00..<<«< The 2000 Florida Statutes Title XXVIII Chapter 380 View Entire NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSERVATION, Land And Water Chapter RECLAMATION, AND USE Management 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- (1) DEFINITION.--The term "development of regional impact," as used in this section, means any development which, because of its character, magnitude, or location, would have a substantial effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of citizens of more than one county. (2) STATEWIDE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.-- (a) The state land planning agency shall recommend to the Administration Commission specific statewide guidelines and standards for adoption pursuant to this subsection. The Administration Commission shall by rule adopt statewide guidelines and standards to be used in determining whether particular developments shall undergo development-of-regional-impact review. The statewide guidelines and standards previously adopted by the Administration Commission and approved by the Legislature shall remain in effect unless revised pursuant to this section or superseded by other provisions of law. Revisions to the present statewide guidelines and standards, after adoption by the Administration Commission, shall be transmitted on or before March 1 to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for presentation at the next regular session of the Legislature. Unless approved by law by the Legislature, the revisions to the present guidelines and standards shall not become effective. (b) In adopting its guidelines and standards, the Administration Commission shall consider and shall be guided by: 1. The extent to which the development would create or alleviate environmental problems such as air or water pollution or noise. 2. The amount of pedestrian or vehicular traffic likely to be generated. 3. The number of persons likely to be residents, employees, or otherwise present. 4. The size of the site to be occupied. 5. The likelihood that additional or subsidiary development will be generated. 6. The extent to which the development would create an additional demand for, or additional use of, energy, including the energy requirements of subsidiary developments. 7. The unique qualities of particular areas of the state. (c) With regard to the changes in the guidelines and standards authorized pursuant to this act, in determining whether a proposed development must comply with the review requirements of this section, the state land planning agency shall apply the guidelines and standards which were http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 2 of 27 in effect when the developer received authorization to commence development from the local government. If a developer has not received authorization to commence development from the local government prior to the effective date of new or amended guidelines and standards, the new or amended guidelines and standards shall apply. (d) The guidelines and standards shall be applied as follows: 1. Fixed thresholds.-- a. A development that is at or below 80 percent of all numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards shall not be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. b. A development that is at or above 120 percent of any numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. c. Projects certified under s. 403.973 which create at least 100 jobs and meet the criteria of the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development as to their impact on an area's economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels that are at or below 100 percent of the numerical thresholds for industrial plants, industrial parks, distribution, warehousing or wholesaling facilities, office development or multiuse projects other than residential, as described in s. 380.0651(3)(c), (d), and (i), are not required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. 2. Rebuttable presumptions.-- a. It shall be presumed that a development that is between 80 and 100 percent of a numerical threshold shall not be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. b. It shall be presumed that a development that is at 100 percent or between 100 and 120 percent of a numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. (e) With respect to residential, hotel, motel, office, and retail developments, the applicable guidelines and standards shall be increased by 50 percent in urban central business districts and regional activity centers of jurisdictions whose local comprehensive plans are in compliance with part II of chapter 163. With respect to multiuse developments, the applicable guidelines and standards shall be increased by 100 percent in urban central business districts and regional activity centers of jurisdictions whose local comprehensive plans are in compliance with part II of chapter 163, if one land use of the multiuse development is residential and amounts to not less than 35 percent of the jurisdiction's applicable residential threshold. With respect to resort or convention hotel developments, the applicable guidelines and standards shall be increased by 150 percent in urban central business districts and regional activity centers of jurisdictions whose local comprehensive plans are in compliance with part II of chapter 163 and where the increase is specifically for a proposed resort or convention hotel located in a county with a population greater than 500,000 and the local government specifically designates that the proposed resort or convention hotel development will serve an existing convention center of more than 250,000 gross square feet built prior to July 1, 1992. The Administration Commission, upon the recommendation of the state land planning agency, shall implement this paragraph by rule no later than December 1, 1993. The increased guidelines and standards authorized by this paragraph shall not be implemented until the effectiveness of the rule which, among other things, shall set forth the pertinent characteristics of urban central business districts and regional activity centers. (3) VARIATION OF THRESHOLDS IN STATEWIDE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.--The state land planning agency, a regional planning agency, or a local government may petition the Administration Commission to increase or decrease the numerical thresholds of any statewide guideline and standard. The state land planning agency or the regional planning agency may petition for an increase or decrease for a particular local government's jurisdiction or a part of a particular jurisdiction. A local government may petition for an increase or decrease within its http://vAvw.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ .../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 3 of 27 jurisdiction or a part of its jurisdiction. A number of requests may be combined in a single petition. (a) When a petition is filed, the state land planning agency shall have no more than 180 days to prepare and submit to the Administration Commission a report and recommendations on the proposed variation. The report shall evaluate, and the Administration Commission shall consider, the following criteria: 1. Whether the local government has adopted and effectively implemented a comprehensive plan that reflects and implements the goals and objectives of an adopted state comprehensive plan. 2. Any applicable policies in an adopted strategic regional policy plan. 3. Whether the local government has adopted and effectively implemented both a comprehensive set of land development regulations, which regulations shall include a planned unit development ordinance, and a capital improvements plan that are consistent with the local government comprehensive plan. 4. Whether the local government has adopted and effectively implemented the authority and the fiscal mechanisms for requiring developers to meet development order conditions. 5. Whether the local government has adopted and effectively implemented and enforced satisfactory development review procedures. (b) The affected regional planning agency, adjoining local governments, and the local government shall be given a reasonable opportunity to submit recommendations to the Administration Commission regarding any such proposed variations. (c) The Administration Commission shall have authority to increase or decrease a threshold in the statewide guidelines and standards up to 50 percent above or below the statewide presumptive threshold. The commission may from time to time reconsider changed thresholds and make additional variations as it deems necessary. (d) The Administration Commission shall adopt rules setting forth the procedures for submission and review of petitions filed pursuant to this subsection. (e) Variations to guidelines and standards adopted by the Administration Commission under this subsection shall be transmitted on or before March 1 to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for presentation at the next regular session of the Legislature. Unless approved as submitted by general law, the revisions shall not become effective. (4) BINDING LETTER.-- (a) If any developer is in doubt whether his or her proposed development must undergo development-of-regional-impact review under the guidelines and standards, whether his or her rights have vested pursuant to subsection (20), or whether a proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to subsection (20) would divest such rights, the developer may request a determination from the state land planning agency. (b) Unless a developer waives the requirements of this paragraph by agreeing to undergo development-of-regional-impact review pursuant to this section, the state land planning agency or local government with jurisdiction over the land on which a development is proposed may require a developer to obtain a binding letter if: 1. The development is at a presumptive numerical threshold or up to 20 percent above a http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 4 of 27 numerical threshold in the guidelines and standards; or 2. The development is between a presumptive numerical threshold and 20 percent below the numerical threshold and the local government or the state land planning agency is in doubt as to whether the character or magnitude of the development at the proposed location creates a likelihood that the development will have a substantial effect on the health, safety, or welfare of citizens of more than one county. (c) Any local government may petition the state land planning agency to require a developer of a development located in an adjacent jurisdiction to obtain a binding letter of interpretation. The petition shall contain facts to support a finding that the development as proposed is a development of regional impact. This paragraph shall not be construed to grant standing to the petitioning local government to initiate an administrative or judicial proceeding pursuant to this chapter. (d) A request for a binding letter of interpretation shall be in writing and in such form and content as prescribed by the state land planning agency. Within 15 days of receiving an application for a binding letter of interpretation or a supplement to a pending application, the state land planning agency shall determine and notify the applicant whether the information in the application is sufficient to enable the agency to issue a binding letter or shall request any additional information needed. The applicant shall either provide the additional information requested or shall notify the state land planning agency in writing that the information will not be supplied and the reasons therefor. If the applicant does not respond to the request for additional information within 120 days, the application for a binding letter of interpretation shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Within 35 days after acknowledging receipt of a sufficient application, or of receiving notification that the information will not be supplied, the state land planning agency shall issue a binding letter of interpretation with respect to the proposed development. A binding letter of interpretation issued by the state land planning agency shall bind all state, regional, and local agencies, as well as the developer. (e) In determining whether a proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to subsection (20) would divest such rights, the state land planning agency shall review the proposed change within the context of: 1. Criteria specified in paragraph (19)(b); 2. Its conformance with any adopted state comprehensive plan and any rules of the state land planning agency; 3. All rights and obligations arising out of the vested status of such development; 4. Permit conditions or requirements imposed by the Department of Environmental Protection or any water management district created by s. 373.069 or any of their successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory agency; and 5. Any regional impacts arising from the proposed change. (f) If a proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to subsection (20) would result in reduced regional impacts, the change shall not divest rights to complete the development pursuant to subsection (20). Furthermore, where all or a portion of the development of regional impact for which rights had previously vested pursuant to subsection (20) is demolished and reconstructed within the same approximate footprint of buildings and parking lots, so that any change in the size of the development does not exceed the criteria of paragraph (19)(b), such demolition and reconstruction shall not divest the rights which had vested. (g) Every binding letter determining that a proposed development is not a development of regional impact, but not including binding letters of vested rights or of modification of vested rights, shall expire and become void unless the plan of development has been substantially http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 5 of 27 commenced within: 1. Three years from October 1, 1985, for binding letters issued prior to the effective date of this act; or 2. Three years from the date of issuance of binding letters issued on or after October 1, 1985. (h) The expiration date of a binding letter, established pursuant to paragraph (g), shall begin to run after final disposition of all administrative and judicial appeals of the binding letter and may be extended by mutual agreement of the state land planning agency, the local government of jurisdiction, and the developer. (i) In response to an inquiry from a developer, the state land planning agency may issue an informal determination in the form of a clearance letter as to whether a development is required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. A clearance letter may be based solely on the information provided by the developer, and the state land planning agency is not required to conduct an investigation of that information. If any material information provided by the developer is incomplete or inaccurate, the clearance letter is not binding upon the state land planning agency. A clearance letter does not constitute final agency action. (5) AUTHORIZATION TO DEVELOP.-- (a)1. A developer who is required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review may undertake a development of regional impact if the development has been approved under the requirements of this section. 2. If the land on which the development is proposed is within an area of critical state concern, the development must also be approved under the requirements of s. 380.05. (b) State or regional agencies may inquire whether a proposed project is undergoing or will be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. If a project is undergoing or will be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review, any state or regional permit necessary for the construction or operation of the project that is valid for 5 years or less shall take effect, and the period of time for which the permit is valid shall begin to run, upon expiration of the time allowed for an administrative appeal of the development or upon final action following an administrative appeal or judicial review, whichever is later. However, if the application for development approval is not filed within 18 months after the issuance of the permit, the time of validity of the permit shall be considered to be from the date of issuance of the permit. If a project is required to obtain a binding letter under subsection (4), any state or regional agency permit necessary for the construction or operation of the project that is valid for 5 years or less shall take effect, and the period of time for which the permit is valid shall begin to run, only after the developer obtains a binding letter stating that the project is not required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review or after the developer obtains a development order pursuant to this section. (c) Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the developer may elect to be bound by the rules adopted pursuant to chapters 373 and 403 in effect when such development order is issued. The rules adopted pursuant to chapters 373 and 403 in effect at the time such development order is issued shall be applicable to all applications for permits pursuant to those chapters and which are necessary for and consistent with the development authorized in such development order, except that a later adopted rule shall be applicable to an application if: 1. The later adopted rule is determined by the rule-adopting agency to be essential to the public health, safety, or welfare; 2. The later adopted rule is adopted pursuant to s. 403.061(27); 3. The later adopted rule is being adopted pursuant to a subsequently enacted statutorily http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 6 of 27 mandated program; 4. The later adopted rule is mandated in order for the state to maintain delegation of a federal program; or 5. The later adopted rule is required by state or federal law. (d) The provision of day care service facilities in developments approved pursuant to this section is permissible but is not required. Further, in order for any developer to apply for permits pursuant to this provision, the application must be filed within 5 years from the issuance of the final development order and the permit shall not be effective for more than 8 years from the issuance of the final development order. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to alter or change any permitting agency's authority to approve permits or to determine applicable criteria for longer periods of time. (6) APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT; CONCURRENT PLAN AMENDMENTS.-- (a) Prior to undertaking any development, a developer that is required to undergo development- of-regional-impact review shall file an application for development approval with the appropriate local government having jurisdiction. The application shall contain, in addition to such other matters as may be required, a statement that the developer proposes to undertake a development of regional impact as required under this section. (b) Any local government comprehensive plan amendments related to a proposed development of regional impact, including any changes proposed under subsection (19), may be initiated by a local planning agency or the developer and must be considered by the local governing body at the same time as the application for development approval using the procedures provided for local plan amendment in s. 163.3187 or s. 163.3189 and applicable local ordinances, without regard to statutory or local ordinance limits on the frequency of consideration of amendments to the local comprehensive plan. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require favorable consideration of a plan amendment solely because it is related to a development of regional impact. The procedure for processing such comprehensive plan amendments is as follows: 1. If a developer seeks a comprehensive plan amendment related to a development of regional impact, the developer must so notify in writing the regional planning agency, the applicable local government, and the state land planning agency no later than the date of preapplication conference or the submission of the proposed change under subsection (19). 2. When filing the application for development approval or the proposed change, the developer must include a written request for comprehensive plan amendments that would be necessitated by the development-of-regional-impact approvals sought. That request must include data and analysis upon which the applicable local government can determine whether to transmit the comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to s. 163.3184. 3. The local government must advertise a public hearing on the transmittal within 30 days after filing the application for development approval or the proposed change and must make a determination on the transmittal within 60 days after the initial filing unless that time is extended by the developer. 4. If the local government approves the transmittal, procedures set forth in s. 163.3184(3)-(6) must be followed. 5. Notwithstanding subsection (11) or subsection (19), the local government may not hold a public hearing on the application for development approval or the proposed change or on the comprehensive plan amendments sooner than 30 days from receipt of the response from the state land planning agency pursuant to s. 163.3184(6). The 60-day time period for local governments to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt plan amendments pursuant to s. 163.3184(7) shall not apply to concurrent plan amendments provided for in this subsection. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 7 of 27 6. The local government must hear both the application for development approval or the proposed change and the comprehensive plan amendments at the same hearing. However, the local government must take action separately on the application for development approval or the proposed change and on the comprehensive plan amendments. 7. Thereafter, the appeal process for the local government development order must follow the provisions of s. 380.07, and the compliance process for the comprehensive plan amendments must follow the provisions of s. 163.3184. (7) PREAPPLICATION PROCEDURES.-- (a) Before filing an application for development approval, the developer shall contact the regional planning agency with jurisdiction over the proposed development to arrange a preapplication conference. Upon the request of the developer or the regional planning agency, other affected state and regional agencies shall participate in this conference and shall identify the types of permits issued by the agencies, the level of information required, and the permit issuance procedures as applied to the proposed development. The regional planning agency shall provide the developer information about the development-of-regional-impact process and the use of preapplication conferences to identify issues, coordinate appropriate state and local agency requirements, and otherwise promote a proper and efficient review of the proposed development. If agreement is reached regarding assumptions and methodology to be used in the application for development approval, the reviewing agencies may not subsequently object to those assumptions and methodologies unless subsequent changes to the project or information obtained during the review make those assumptions and methodologies inappropriate. (b) The regional planning agency shall establish by rule a procedure by which a developer may enter into binding written agreements with the regional planning agency to eliminate questions from the application for development approval when those questions are found to be unnecessary for development-of-regional-impact review. It is the legislative intent of this subsection to encourage reduction of paperwork, to discourage unnecessary gathering of data, and to encourage the coordination of the development-of-regional-impact review process with federal, state, and local environmental reviews when such reviews are required by law. (c) If the application for development approval is not submitted within 1 year after the date of the preapplication conference, the regional planning agency, the local government having jurisdiction, or the applicant may request that another preapplication conference be held. (8) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS.-- (a) A developer may enter into a written preliminary development agreement with the state land planning agency to allow a developer to proceed with a limited amount of the total proposed development, subject to all other governmental approvals and solely at the developer's own risk, prior to issuance of a final development order. All owners of the land in the total proposed development shall join the developer as parties to the agreement. Each agreement shall include and be subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with the preapplication conference requirements pursuant to subsection (7) within 45 days after the execution of the agreement. 2. The developer shall file an application for development approval for the total proposed development within 3 months after execution of the agreement, unless the state land planning agency agrees to a different time for good cause shown. Failure to timely file an application and to otherwise diligently proceed in good faith to obtain a final development order shall constitute a breach of the preliminary development agreement. 3. The agreement shall include maps and legal descriptions of both the preliminary development area and the total proposed development area and shall specifically describe the preliminary development in terms of magnitude and location. The area approved for preliminary development http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 8 of 27 must be included in the application for development approval and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the final development order. 4. The preliminary development shall be limited to lands that the state land planning agency agrees are suitable for development and shall only be allowed in areas where adequate public infrastructure exists to accommodate the preliminary development, when such development will utilize public infrastructure. The developer must also demonstrate that the preliminary development will not result in material adverse impacts to existing resources or existing or planned facilities. 5. The preliminary development agreement may allow development which is: a. Less than or equal to 80 percent of any applicable threshold if the developer demonstrates that such development is consistent with subparagraph 4.; or b. Less than 120 percent of any applicable threshold if the developer demonstrates that such development is part of a proposed downtown development of regional impact specified in subsection (22) or part of any areawide development of regional impact specified in subsection (25) and that the development is consistent with subparagraph 4. 6. The developer and owners of the land may not claim vested rights, or assert equitable estoppel, arising from the agreement or any expenditures or actions taken in reliance on the agreement to continue with the total proposed development beyond the preliminary development. The agreement shall not entitle the developer to a final development order approving the total proposed development or to particular conditions in a final development order. 7. The agreement shall not prohibit the regional planning agency from reviewing or commenting on any regional issue that the regional agency determines should be included in the regional agency's report on the application for development approval. 8. The agreement shall include a disclosure by the developer and all the owners of the land in the total proposed development of all land or development within 5 miles of the total proposed development in which they have an interest and shall describe such interest. 9. In the event of a breach of the agreement or failure to comply with any condition of the agreement, or if the agreement was based on materially inaccurate information, the state land planning agency may terminate the agreement or file suit to enforce the agreement as provided in this section and s. 380.11, including a suit to enjoin all development. 10. A notice of the preliminary development agreement shall be recorded by the developer in accordance with s. 28.222 with the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which land covered by the terms of the agreement is located. The notice shall include a legal description of the land covered by the agreement and shall state the parties to the agreement, the date of adoption of the agreement and any subsequent amendments, the location where the agreement may be examined, and that the agreement constitutes a land development regulation applicable to portions of the land covered by the agreement. The provisions of the agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon successors and assigns of the parties in the agreement. 11. Except for those agreements which authorize preliminary development for substantial deviations pursuant to subsection (19), a developer who no longer wishes to pursue a development of regional impact may propose to abandon any preliminary development agreement executed after January 1, 1985, including those pursuant to s. 380.032(3), provided at the time of abandonment: a. A final development order under this section has been rendered that approves all of the development actually constructed; or http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 9 of 27 b. The amount of development is less than 80 percent of all numerical thresholds of the guidelines and standards, and the state land planning agency determines in writing that the development to date is in compliance with all applicable local regulations and the terms and conditions of the preliminary development agreement and otherwise adequately mitigates for the impacts of the development to date. In either event, when a developer proposes to abandon said agreement, the developer shall give written notice and state that he or she is no longer proposing a development of regional impact and provide adequate documentation that he or she has met the criteria for abandonment of the agreement to the state land planning agency. Within 30 days of receipt of adequate documentation of such notice, the state land planning agency shall make its determination as to whether or not the developer meets the criteria for abandonment. Once the state land planning agency determines that the developer meets the criteria for abandonment, the state land planning agency shall issue a notice of abandonment which shall be recorded by the developer in accordance with s. 28.222 with the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which land covered by the terms of the agreement is located. (b) The state land planning agency may enter into other types of agreements to effectuate the provisions of this act as provided in s. 380.032. (c) The provisions of this subsection shall also be available to a developer who chooses to seek development approval of a Florida Quality Development pursuant to s. 380.061. (9) CONCEPTUAL AGENCY REVIEW.-- (a)1. In order to facilitate the planning and preparation of permit applications for projects that undergo development-of-regional-impact review, and in order to coordinate the information required to issue such permits, a developer may elect to request conceptual agency review under this subsection either concurrently with development-of-regional-impact review and comprehensive plan amendments, if applicable, or subsequent to a preapplication conference held pursuant to subsection (7). 2. "Conceptual agency review" means general review of the proposed location, densities, intensity of use, character, and major design features of a proposed development required to undergo review under this section for the purpose of considering whether these aspects of the proposed development comply with the issuing agency's statutes and rules. 3. Conceptual agency review is a licensing action subject to chapter 120, and approval or denial constitutes final agency action, except that the 90-day time period specified in s. 120.60(1) shall be tolled for the agency when the affected regional planning agency requests information from the developer pursuant to paragraph (10)(b). If proposed agency action on the conceptual approval is the subject of a proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57, final agency action shall be conclusive as to any issues actually raised and adjudicated in the proceeding, and such issues may not be raised in any subsequent proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57 on the proposed development by any parties to the prior proceeding. 4. A conceptual agency review approval shall be valid for up to 10 years, unless otherwise provided in a state or regional agency rule, and may be reviewed and reissued for additional periods of time under procedures established by the agency. (b) The Department of Environmental Protection, each water management district, and each other state or regional agency that requires construction or operation permits shall establish by rule a set of procedures necessary for conceptual agency review for the following permitting activities within their respective regulatory jurisdictions: 1. The construction and operation of potential sources of water pollution, including industrial wastewater, domestic wastewater, and stormwater. 2. Dredging and filling activities. http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 10 of 27 3. The management and storage of surface waters. 4. The construction and operation of works of the district, only if a conceptual agency review approval is requested under subparagraph 3. Any state or regional agency may establish rules for conceptual agency review for any other permitting activities within its respective regulatory jurisdiction. (c)1. Each agency participating in conceptual agency reviews shall determine and establish by rule its information and application requirements and furnish these requirements to the state land planning agency and to any developer seeking conceptual agency review under this subsection. 2. Each agency shall cooperate with the state land planning agency to standardize, to the extent possible, review procedures, data requirements, and data collection methodologies among all participating agencies, consistent with the requirements of the statutes that establish the permitting programs for each agency. (d) At the conclusion of the conceptual agency review, the agency shall give notice of its proposed agency action as required by s. 120.60(3) and shall forward a copy of the notice to the appropriate regional planning council with a report setting out the agency's conclusions on potential development impacts and stating whether the agency intends to grant conceptual approval, with or without conditions, or to deny conceptual approval. If the agency intends to deny conceptual approval, the report shall state the reasons therefor. The agency may require the developer to publish notice of proposed agency action in accordance with s. 403.815. (e) An agency's decision to grant conceptual approval shall not relieve the developer of the requirement to obtain a permit and to meet the standards for issuance of a construction or operation permit or to meet the agency's information requirements for such a permit. Nevertheless, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the developer is entitled to receive a construction or operation permit for an activity for which the agency granted conceptual review approval, to the extent that the project for which the applicant seeks a permit is in accordance with the conceptual approval and with the agency's standards and criteria for issuing a construction or operation permit. The agency may revoke or appropriately modify a valid conceptual approval if the agency shows: 1. That an applicant or his or her agent has submitted materially false or inaccurate information in the application for conceptual approval; 2. That the developer has violated a condition of the conceptual approval; or 3. That the development will cause a violation of the agency's applicable laws or rules. (f) Nothing contained in this subsection shall modify or abridge the law of vested rights or estoppel. (g) Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed to preclude an agency from adopting rules for conceptual review for developments which are not developments of regional impact. (10) APPLICATION; SUFFICIENCY.-- (a) When an application for development approval is filed with a local government, the developer shall also send copies of the application to the appropriate regional planning agency and the state land planning agency. (b) If a regional planning agency determines that the application for development approval is insufficient for the agency to discharge its responsibilities under subsection (12), it shall provide http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 11 of 27 in writing to the appropriate local government and the applicant a statement of any additional information desired within 30 days of the receipt of the application by the regional planning agency. The applicant may supply the information requested by the regional planning agency and shall communicate its intention to do so in writing to the appropriate local government and the regional planning agency within 5 working days of the receipt of the statement requesting such information, or the applicant shall notify the appropriate local government and the regional planning agency in writing that the requested information will not be supplied. Within 30 days after receipt of such additional information, the regional planning agency shall review it and may request only that information needed to clarify the additional information or to answer new questions raised by, or directly related to, the additional information. The regional planning agency may request additional information no more than twice, unless the developer waives this limitation. If an applicant does not provide the information requested by a regional planning agency within 120 days of its request, or within a time agreed upon by the applicant and the regional planning agency, the application shall be considered withdrawn. (c) The regional planning agency shall notify the local government that a public hearing date may be set when the regional planning agency determines that the application is sufficient or when it receives notification from the developer that the additional requested information will not be supplied, as provided for in paragraph (b). (11) LOCAL NOTICE.--Upon receipt of the sufficiency notification from the regional planning agency required by paragraph (10)(c), the appropriate local government shall give notice and hold a public hearing on the application in the same manner as for a rezoning as provided under the appropriate special or local law or ordinance, except that such hearing proceedings shall be recorded by tape or a certified court reporter and made available for transcription at the expense of any interested party. When a development of regional impact is proposed within the jurisdiction of more than one local government, the local governments, at the request of the developer, may hold a joint public hearing. The local government shall comply with the following additional requirements: (a) The notice of public hearing shall state that the proposed development is undergoing a development-of-regional-impact review. (b) The notice shall be published at least 60 days in advance of the hearing and shall specify where the information and reports on the development-of-regional-impact application may be reviewed. (c) The notice shall be given to the state land planning agency, to the applicable regional planning agency, to any state or regional permitting agency participating in a conceptual agency review process under subsection (9), and to such other persons as may have been designated by the state land planning agency as entitled to receive such notices. (d) A public hearing date shall be set by the appropriate local government at the next scheduled meeting. The public hearing shall be held no later than 90 days after issuance of notice by the regional planning agency that a public hearing may be set, unless an extension is requested by the applicant. (12) REGIONAL REPORTS.-- (a) Within 50 days after receipt of the notice of public hearing required in paragraph (11)(c), the regional planning agency, if one has been designated for the area including the local government, shall prepare and submit to the local government a report and recommendations on the regional impact of the proposed development. In preparing its report and recommendations, the regional planning agency shall identify regional issues based upon the following review criteria and make recommendations to the local government on these regional issues, specifically considering whether, and the extent to which: 1. The development will have a favorable or unfavorable impact on state or regional resources or facilities identified in the applicable state or regional plans. For the purposes of this subsection, "applicable state plan" means the state comprehensive plan. For the purposes of this subsection, http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 12 of 27 "applicable regional plan" means an adopted comprehensive regional policy plan until the adoption of a strategic regional policy plan pursuant to s. 186.508, and thereafter means an adopted strategic regional policy plan. 2. The development will significantly impact adjacent jurisdictions. At the request of the appropriate local government, regional planning agencies may also review and comment upon issues that affect only the requesting local government. 3. As one of the issues considered in the review in subparagraphs 1. and 2., the development will favorably or adversely affect the ability of people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The determination should take into account information on factors that are relevant to the availability of reasonably accessible adequate housing. Adequate housing means housing that is available for occupancy and that is not substandard. (b) At the request of the regional planning agency, other appropriate agencies shall review the proposed development and shall prepare reports and recommendations on issues that are clearly within the jurisdiction of those agencies. Such agency reports shall become part of the regional planning agency report; however, the regional planning agency may attach dissenting views. When water management district and Department of Environmental Protection permits have been issued pursuant to chapter 373 or chapter 403, the regional planning council may comment on the regional implications of the permits but may not offer conflicting recommendations. (c) The regional planning agency shall afford the developer or any substantially affected party reasonable opportunity to present evidence to the regional planning agency head relating to the proposed regional agency report and recommendations. (13) CRITERIA IN AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN.--If the development is in an area of critical state concern, the local government shall approve it only if it complies with the land development regulations therefor under s. 380.05 and the provisions of this section. The provisions of this section shall not apply to developments in areas of critical state concern which had pending applications and had been noticed or agendaed by local government after September 1, 1985, and before October 1, 1985, for development order approval. In all such cases, the state land planning agency may consider and address applicable regional issues contained in subsection (12) as part of its area-of-critical-state-concern review pursuant to ss. 380.05, 380.07, and 380.11. (14) CRITERIA OUTSIDE AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN.--If the development is not located in an area of critical state concern, in considering whether the development shall be approved, denied, or approved subject to conditions, restrictions, or limitations, the local government shall consider whether, and the extent to which: (a) The development is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations; (b) The development is consistent with the report and recommendations of the regional planning agency submitted pursuant to subsection (12); and (c) The development is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. In consistency determinations the plan shall be construed and applied in accordance with s. 187.101(3). (15) LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ORDER.-- (a) The appropriate local government shall render a decision on the application within 30 days after the hearing unless an extension is requested by the developer. (b) When possible, local governments shall issue development orders concurrently with any other local permits or development approvals that may be applicable to the proposed development. http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 13 of 27 (c) The development order shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with subsections (13) and (14). The development order: 1. Shall specify the monitoring procedures and the local official responsible for assuring compliance by the developer with the development order. 2. Shall establish compliance dates for the development order, including a deadline for commencing physical development and for compliance with conditions of approval or phasing requirements, and shall include a termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development. 3. Shall establish a date until which the local government agrees that the approved development of regional impact shall not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the local government can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the development order have occurred or the development order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the developer or that the change is clearly established by local government to be essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. 4. Shall specify the requirements for the annual report designated under subsection (18), including the date of submission, parties to whom the report is submitted, and contents of the report, based upon the rules adopted by the state land planning agency. Such rules shall specify the scope of any additional local requirements that may be necessary for the report. 5. May specify the types of changes to the development which shall require submission for a substantial deviation determination under subsection (19). 6. Shall include a legal description of the property. (d) Conditions of a development order that require a developer to contribute land for a public facility or construct, expand, or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of a public facility, or portion thereof, shall meet the following criteria: 1. The need to construct new facilities or add to the present system of public facilities must be reasonably attributable to the proposed development. 2. Any contribution of funds, land, or public facilities required from the developer shall be comparable to the amount of funds, land, or public facilities that the state or the local government would reasonably expect to expend or provide, based on projected costs of comparable projects, to mitigate the impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. 3. Any funds or lands contributed must be expressly designated and used to mitigate impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. 4. Construction or expansion of a public facility by a nongovernmental developer as a condition of a development order to mitigate the impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development is not subject to competitive bidding or competitive negotiation for selection of a contractor or design professional for any part of the construction or design unless required by the local government that issues the development order. (e)1. Effective July 1, 1986, a local government shall not include, as a development order condition for a development of regional impact, any requirement that a developer contribute or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of public facilities or portions thereof unless the local government has enacted a local ordinance which requires other development not subject to this section to contribute its proportionate share of the funds, land, or public facilities necessary to accommodate any impacts having a rational nexus to the proposed development, and the need to construct new facilities or add to the present system of public facilities must be http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 14 of 27 reasonably attributable to the proposed development. 2. A local government shall not approve a development of regional impact that does not make adequate provision for the public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development unless the local government includes in the development order a commitment by the local government to provide these facilities consistently with the development schedule approved in the development order; however, a local government's failure to meet the requirements of subparagraph 1. and this subparagraph shall not preclude the issuance of a development order where adequate provision is made by the developer for the public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development. Any funds or lands contributed by a developer must be expressly designated and used to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. 3. The Department of Community Affairs and other state and regional agencies involved in the administration and implementation of this act shall cooperate and work with units of local government in preparing and adopting local impact fee and other contribution ordinances. (f) Notice of the adoption of a development order or the subsequent amendments to an adopted development order shall be recorded by the developer, in accordance with s. 28.222, with the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which the development is located. The notice shall include a legal description of the property covered by the order and shall state which unit of local government adopted the development order, the date of adoption, the date of adoption of any amendments to the development order, the location where the adopted order with any amendments may be examined, and that the development order constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the property. The recording of this notice shall not constitute a lien, cloud, or encumbrance on real property, or actual or constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance. This paragraph applies only to developments initially approved under this section after July 1, 1980. (g) A local government shall not issue permits for development subsequent to the termination date or expiration date contained in the development order unless: 1. The proposed development has been evaluated cumulatively with existing development under the substantial deviation provisions of subsection (19) subsequent to the termination or expiration date; 2. The proposed development is consistent with an abandonment of development order that has been issued in accordance with the provisions of subsection (26); or 3. The project has been determined to be an essentially built-out development of regional impact through an agreement executed by the developer, the state land planning agency, and the local government, in accordance with s. 380.032, which will establish the terms and conditions under which the development may be continued. If the project is determined to be essentially built-out, development may proceed pursuant to the s. 380.032 agreement after the termination or expiration date contained in the development order without further development- of-regional-impact review subject to the local government comprehensive plan and land development regulations or subject to a modified development-of-regional-impact analysis. As used in this paragraph, an "essentially built-out" development of regional impact means: a. The development is in compliance with all applicable terms and conditions of the development order except the built-out date; and b.(I) The amount of development that remains to be built is less than the substantial deviation threshold specified in paragraph (19)(b) for each individual land use category, or, for a multiuse development, the sum total of all unbuilt land uses as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation threshold is equal to or less than 100 percent; or (II) The state land planning agency and the local government have agreed in writing that the amount of development to be built does not create the likelihood of any additional regional http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 15 of 27 impact not previously reviewed. (h) If the property is annexed by another local jurisdiction, the annexing jurisdiction shall adopt a new development order that incorporates all previous rights and obligations specified in the prior development order. (16) CREDITS AGAINST LOCAL IMPACT FEES.-- (a) If the development order requires the developer to contribute land or a public facility or construct, expand, or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of a public facility, or portion thereof, and the developer is also subject by local ordinance to impact fees or exactions to meet the same needs, the local government shall establish and implement a procedure that credits a development order exaction or fee toward an impact fee or exaction imposed by local ordinance for the same need; however, if the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission imposes any additional requirement, the local government shall not be required to grant a credit toward the local exaction or impact fee unless the local government determines that such required contribution, payment, or construction meets the same need that the local exaction or impact fee would address. The nongovernmental developer need not be required, by virtue of this credit, to competitively bid or negotiate any part of the construction or design of the facility, unless otherwise requested by the local government. (b) If the local government imposes or increases an impact fee or exaction by local ordinance after a development order has been issued, the developer may petition the local government, and the local government shall modify the affected provisions of the development order to give the developer credit for any contribution of land for a public facility, or construction, expansion, or contribution of funds for land acquisition or construction or expansion of a public facility, or a portion thereof, required by the development order toward an impact fee or exaction for the same need. (c) The local government and the developer may enter into capital contribution front-ending agreements as part of a development-of-regional-impact development order to reimburse the developer, or the developer's successor, for voluntary contributions paid in excess of his or her fair share. (d) This subsection does not apply to internal, onsite facilities required by local regulations or to any offsite facilities to the extent such facilities are necessary to provide safe and adequate services to the development. (17) LOCAL MONITORING.--The local government issuing the development order is primarily responsible for monitoring the development and enforcing the provisions of the development order. Local governments shall not issue any permits or approvals or provide any extensions of services if the developer fails to act in substantial compliance with the development order. (18) ANNUAL REPORTS.--The developer shall submit an annual report on the development of regional impact to the local government, the regional planning agency, the state land planning agency, and all affected permit agencies on the date specified in the development order. If the annual report is not received, the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency shall notify the local government. If the local government does not receive the annual report or receives notification that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the developer submit the report within 30 days. The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government. (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- (a) Any proposed change to a previously approved development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be subject to further development-of-regional-impact review. http://viww.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ .../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 16 of 27 There are a variety of reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an approved development of regional impact, including changed market conditions. The procedures set forth in this subsection are for that purpose. (b) Any proposed change to a previously approved development of regional impact or development order condition which, either individually or cumulatively with other changes, exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be subject to further development-of-regional-impact review without the necessity for a finding of same by the local government: 1. An increase in the number of parking spaces at an attraction or recreational facility by 5 percent or 300 spaces, whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 5 percent or 1,000 spectators, whichever is greater. 2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 25-percent lengthening of an existing runway, or a 25-percent increase in the number of gates of an existing terminal, but only if the increase adds at least three additional gates. However, if an airport is located in two counties, a 10-percent lengthening of an existing runway or a 20-percent increase in the number of gates of an existing terminal is the applicable criteria. 3. An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 percent or 60 beds, whichever is greater. 4. An increase in industrial development area by 5 percent or 32 acres, whichever is greater. 5. An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 5 percent or 10 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase in the average daily water consumption by a mining operation by 5 percent or 300,000 gallons, whichever is greater. An increase in the size of the mine by 5 percent or 750 acres, whichever is less. 6. An increase in land area for office development by 5 percent or 6 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase of gross floor area of office development by 5 percent or 60,000 gross square feet, whichever is greater. 7. An increase in the storage capacity for chemical or petroleum storage facilities by 5 percent, 20,000 barrels, or 7 million pounds, whichever is greater. 8. An increase of development at a waterport of wet storage for 20 watercraft, dry storage for 30 watercraft, or wet/dry storage for 60 watercraft in an area identified in the state marina siting plan as an appropriate site for additional waterport development or a 5-percent increase in watercraft storage capacity, whichever is greater. 9. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 5 percent or 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater. 10. An increase in commercial development by 6 acres of land area or by 50,000 square feet of gross floor area, or of parking spaces provided for customers for 300 cars or a 5-percent increase of any of these, whichever is greater. 11. An increase in hotel or motel facility units by 5 percent or 75 units, whichever is greater. 12. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by 5 percent or 100 vehicle spaces, whichever is less. 13. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of 5 percent or 20 acres, whichever is less. 14. A proposed increase to an approved multiuse development of regional impact where the sum of the increases of each land use as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation criteria is http://vrvvw.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ .../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 17 of 27 equal to or exceeds 100 percent. The percentage of any decrease in the amount of open space shall be treated as an increase for purposes of determining when 100 percent has been reached or exceeded. 15. A 15-percent increase in the number of external vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was projected during the original development-of-regional-impact review. 16. Any change which would result in development of any area which was specifically set aside in the application for development approval or in the development order for preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern and their habitat, primary dunes, or archaeological and historical sites designated as significant by the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. The further refinement of such areas by survey shall be considered under sub-subparagraph (e) 5.b. The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs 4., 6., 10., 14., excluding residential uses, and 15., are increased by 100 percent for a project certified under s. 403.973 which creates jobs and meets criteria established by the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development as to its impact on an area's economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels. The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs 4., 6., 9., 10., 11., and 14. are increased by 50 percent for a project located wholly within an urban infill and redevelopment area designated on the applicable adopted local comprehensive plan future land use map and not located within the coastal high hazard area. (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of- regional-impact review. An extension of the date of buildout, or any phase thereof, of 5 years or more but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. An extension of less than 5 years is not a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a buildout, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time. (d) A change in the plan of development of an approved development of regional impact resulting from requirements imposed by the Department of Environmental Protection or any water management district created by s. 373.069 or any of their successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory agency shall be submitted to the local government pursuant to this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. (e)1. A proposed change which, either individually or, if there were previous changes, cumulatively with those changes, is equal to or exceeds 40 percent of any numerical criterion in subparagraphs (b)1.-15., but which does not exceed such criterion, shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government pursuant to subparagraph (f)5. 2. Except for a development order rendered pursuant to subsection (22) or subsection (25), a proposed change to a development order that individually or cumulatively with any previous change is less than 40 percent of any numerical criterion contained in subparagraphs (b)1.-15. and does not exceed any other criterion, or that involves an extension of the buildout date of a development, or any phase thereof, of less than 5 years is not subject to the public hearing requirements of subparagraph (f)3., and is not subject to a determination pursuant to subparagraph (f)5. Notice of the proposed change shall be made to the regional planning council and the state land planning agency. Such notice shall include a description of previous individual changes made to the development, including changes previously approved by the local http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 18 of 27 government, and shall include appropriate amendments to the development order. The following changes, individually or cumulatively with any previous changes, are not substantial deviations: a. Changes in the name of the project, developer, owner, or monitoring official. b. Changes to a setback that do not affect noise buffers, environmental protection or mitigation areas, or archaeological or historical resources. c. Changes to minimum lot sizes. d. Changes in the configuration of internal roads that do not affect external access points. e. Changes to the building design or orientation that stay approximately within the approved area designated for such building and parking lot, and which do not affect historical buildings designated as significant by the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. f. Changes to increase the acreage in the development, provided that no development is proposed on the acreage to be added. g. Changes to eliminate an approved land use, provided that there are no additional regional impacts. h. Changes required to conform to permits approved by any federal, state, or regional permitting agency, provided that these changes do not create additional regional impacts. i. Any other change which the state land planning agency agrees in writing is similar in nature, impact, or character to the changes enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-h. and which does not create the likelihood of any additional regional impact. This subsection does not require a development order amendment for any change listed in sub- subparagraphs a.-i. unless such issue is addressed either in the existing development order or in the application for development approval, but, in the case of the application, only if, and in the manner in which, the application is incorporated in the development order. 3. Except for the change authorized by sub-subparagraph 2.f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. 4. Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved development shall include a description of individual changes previously made to the development, including changes previously approved by the local government. The local government shall consider the previous and current proposed changes in deciding whether such changes cumulatively constitute a substantial deviation requiring further development-of-regional-impact review. 5. The following changes to an approved development of regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. a. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the acreage to a land use not previously approved in the development order. Changes of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation. b. Except for the types of uses listed in subparagraph (b)16., any change which would result in the development of any area which was specifically set aside in the application for development approval or in the development order for preservation, buffers, or special protection, including habitat for plant and animal species, archaeological and historical sites, dunes, and other special areas. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ .../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 19 of 27 c. Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized multiuse development of regional impact which was originally approved with three or more uses specified in s. 380.0651(3)(c), (d), (f), and (g) and residential use. (f)1. The state land planning agency shall establish by rule standard forms for submittal of proposed changes to a previously approved development of regional impact which may require further development-of-regional-impact review. At a minimum, the standard form shall require the developer to provide the precise language that the developer proposes to delete or add as an amendment to the development order. 2. The developer shall submit, simultaneously, to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency the request for approval of a proposed change. 3. No sooner than 30 days but no later than 45 days after submittal by the developer to the local government, the state land planning agency, and the appropriate regional planning agency, the local government shall give 15 days' notice and schedule a public hearing to consider the change that the developer asserts does not create a substantial deviation. This public hearing shall be held within 90 days after submittal of the proposed changes, unless that time is extended by the developer. 4. The appropriate regional planning agency or the state land planning agency shall review the proposed change and, no later than 45 days after submittal by the developer of the proposed change, unless that time is extended by the developer, and prior to the public hearing at which the proposed change is to be considered, shall advise the local government in writing whether it objects to the proposed change, shall specify the reasons for its objection, if any, and shall provide a copy to the developer. A change which is subject to the substantial deviation criteria specified in sub-subparagraph (e)5.c. shall not be subject to this requirement. 5. At the public hearing, the local government shall determine whether the proposed change requires further development-of-regional-impact review. The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (e), the thresholds set forth in paragraph (b), and the presumptions set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) and subparagraphs (e)1. and 3. shall be applicable in determining whether further development-of-regional-impact review is required. 6. If the local government determines that the proposed change does not require further development-of-regional-impact review and is otherwise approved, or if the proposed change is not subject to a hearing and determination pursuant to subparagraphs 3. and 5. and is otherwise approved, the local government shall issue an amendment to the development order incorporating the approved change and conditions of approval relating to the change. The decision of the local government to approve, with or without conditions, or to deny the proposed change that the developer asserts does not require further review shall be subject to the appeal provisions of s. 380.07. However, the state land planning agency may not appeal the local government decision if it did not comply with subparagraph 4. The state land planning agency may not appeal a change to a development order made pursuant to subparagraph (e)2. for developments of regional impact approved after January 1, 1980, unless the change would result in a significant impact to a regionally significant archaeological, historical, or natural resource not previously identified in the original development-of-regional-impact review. (g) If a proposed change requires further development-of-regional-impact review pursuant to this section, the review shall be conducted subject to the following additional conditions: 1. The development-of-regional-impact review conducted by the appropriate regional planning agency shall address only those issues raised by the proposed change except as provided in subparagraph 2. 2. The regional planning agency shall consider, and the local government shall determine whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposed change as it relates to the http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 20 of 27 entire development. If the local government determines that the proposed change, as it relates to the entire development, is unacceptable, the local government shall deny the change. 3. If the local government determines that the proposed change, as it relates to the entire development, should be approved, any new conditions in the amendment to the development order issued by the local government shall address only those issues raised by the proposed change. 4. Development within the previously approved development of regional impact may continue, as approved, during the development-of-regional-impact review in those portions of the development which are not affected by the proposed change. (h) When further development-of-regional-impact review is required because a substantial deviation has been determined or admitted by the developer, the amendment to the development order issued by the local government shall be consistent with the requirements of subsection (15) and shall be subject to the hearing and appeal provisions of s. 380.07. The state land planning agency or the appropriate regional planning agency need not participate at the local hearing in order to appeal a local government development order issued pursuant to this paragraph. (20) VESTED RIGHTS.--Nothing in this section shall limit or modify the rights of any person to complete any development that has been authorized by registration of a subdivision pursuant to chapter 498, by recordation pursuant to local subdivision plat law, or by a building permit or other authorization to commence development on which there has been reliance and a change of position and which registration or recordation was accomplished, or which permit or authorization was issued, prior to July 1, 1973. If a developer has, by his or her actions in reliance on prior regulations, obtained vested or other legal rights that in law would have prevented a local government from changing those regulations in a way adverse to the developer's interests, nothing in this chapter authorizes any governmental agency to abridge those rights. (a) For the purpose of determining the vesting of rights under this subsection, approval pursuant to local subdivision plat law, ordinances, or regulations of a subdivision plat by formal vote of a county or municipal governmental body having jurisdiction after August 1, 1967, and prior to July 1, 1973, is sufficient to vest all property rights for the purposes of this subsection; and no action in reliance on, or change of position concerning, such local governmental approval is required for vesting to take place. Anyone claiming vested rights under this paragraph must so notify the department in writing by January 1, 1986. Such notification shall include information adequate to document the rights established by this subsection. When such notification requirements are met, in order for the vested rights authorized pursuant to this paragraph to remain valid after June 30, 1990, development of the vested plan must be commenced prior to that date upon the property that the state land planning agency has determined to have acquired vested rights following the notification or in a binding letter of interpretation. When the notification requirements have not been met, the vested rights authorized by this paragraph shall expire June 30, 1986, unless development commenced prior to that date. (b) For the purpose of this act, the conveyance of, or the agreement to convey, property to the county, state, or local government as a prerequisite to zoning change approval shall be construed as an act of reliance to vest rights as determined under this subsection, provided such zoning change is actually granted by such government. (21) COMPREHENSIVE APPLICATION; MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT ORDER.-- (a) If a development project includes two or more developments of regional impact, a developer may file a comprehensive development-of-regional-impact application. (b) If a proposed development is planned for development over an extended period of time, the developer may file an application for master development approval of the project and agree to present subsequent increments of the development for preconstruction review. This agreement shall be entered into by the developer, the regional planning agency, and the appropriate local http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch03 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 21 of 27 government having jurisdiction. The provisions of subsection (9) do not apply to this subsection, except that a developer may elect to utilize the review process established in subsection (9) for review of the increments of a master plan. 1. Prior to adoption of the master plan development order, the developer, the landowner, the appropriate regional planning agency, and the local government having jurisdiction shall review the draft of the development order to ensure that anticipated regional impacts have been adequately addressed and that information requirements for subsequent incremental application review are clearly defined. The development order for a master application shall specify the information which must be submitted with an incremental application and shall identify those issues which can result in the denial of an incremental application. 2. The review of subsequent incremental applications shall be limited to that information specifically required and those issues specifically raised by the master development order, unless substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the master plan development order are demonstrated or the master development order is shown to have been based on substantially inaccurate information. (c) The state land planning agency, by rule, shall establish uniform procedures to implement this subsection. (22) DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES.-- (a) A downtown development authority may submit a development-of-regional-impact application for development approval pursuant to this section. The area described in the application may consist of any or all of the land over which a downtown development authority has the power described in s. 380.031(5). For the purposes of this subsection, a downtown development authority shall be considered the developer whether or not the development will be undertaken by the downtown development authority. (b) In addition to information required by the development-of-regional-impact application, the application for development approval submitted by a downtown development authority shall specify the total amount of development planned for each land use category. In addition to the requirements of subsection (15), the development order shall specify the amount of development approved within each land use category. Development undertaken in conformance with a development order issued under this section does not require further review. (c) If a development is proposed within the area of a downtown development plan approved pursuant to this section which would result in development in excess of the amount specified in the development order for that type of activity, changes shall be subject to the provisions of subsection (19), except that the percentages and numerical criteria shall be double those listed in paragraph (19)(b). (d) The provisions of subsection (9) do not apply to this subsection. (23) ADOPTION OF RULES BY STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY.-- (a) The state land planning agency shall adopt rules to ensure uniform review of developments of regional impact by the state land planning agency and regional planning agencies under this section. These rules shall be adopted pursuant to chapter 120 and shall include all forms, application content, and review guidelines necessary to implement development-of-regional- impact reviews. The state land.planning agency, in consultation with the regional planning agencies, may also designate types of development or areas suitable for development in which reduced information requirements for development-of-regional-impact review shall apply. (b) Regional planning agencies shall be subject to rules adopted by the state land planning agency. At the request of a regional planning council, the state land planning agency may adopt by rule different standards for a specific comprehensive planning district upon a finding that the statewide standard is inadequate to protect or promote the regional interest at issue. If such a http://www.leg. state. fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 22 of 27 regional standard is adopted by the state land planning agency, the regional standard shall be applied to all pertinent development-of-regional-impact reviews conducted in that region until rescinded. (c) Within 6 months of the effective date of this section, the state land planning agency shall adopt rules which: 1. Establish uniform statewide standards for development-of-regional-impact review. 2. Establish a short application for development approval form which eliminates issues and questions for any project in a jurisdiction with an adopted local comprehensive plan that is in compliance. (d) Regional planning agencies that perform development-of-regional-impact and Florida Quality Development review are authorized to assess and collect fees to fund the costs, direct and indirect, of conducting the review process. The state land planning agency shall adopt rules to provide uniform criteria for the assessment and collection of such fees. The rules providing uniform criteria shall not be subject to rule challenge under s. 120.56(2) or to drawout proceedings under s. 120.54(3)(c)2., but, once adopted, shall be subject to an invalidity challenge under s. 120.56(3) by substantially affected persons. Until the state land planning agency adopts a rule implementing this paragraph, rules of the regional planning councils currently in effect regarding fees shall remain in effect. Fees may vary in relation to the type and size of a proposed project, but shall not exceed $75,000, unless the state land planning agency, after reviewing any disputed expenses charged by the regional planning agency, determines that said expenses were reasonable and necessary for an adequate regional review of the impacts of a project. (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- (a) Any proposed hospital which has a designed capacity of not more than 100 beds is exempt from the provisions of this section. (b) Any proposed electrical transmission line or electrical power plant is exempt from the provisions of this section, except any steam or solar electrical generating facility of less than 50 megawatts in capacity attached to a development of regional impact. (c) Any proposed addition to an existing sports facility complex is exempt from the provisions of this section if the addition meets the following characteristics: 1. It would not operate concurrently with the scheduled hours of operation of the existing facility. 2. Its seating capacity would be no more than 75 percent of the capacity of the existing facility. 3. The sports facility complex property is owned by a public body prior to July 1, 1983. This exemption does not apply to any pari-mutuel facility. (d) Any proposed addition or cumulative additions subsequent to July 1, 1988, to an existing sports facility complex owned by a state university is exempt if the increased seating capacity of the complex is no more than 30 percent of the capacity of the existing facility. (e) Any addition of permanent seats or parking spaces for an existing sports facility located on property owned by a public body prior to July 1, 1973, is exempt from the provisions of this section if future additions do not expand existing permanent seating or parking capacity more than 15 percent annually in excess of the prior year's capacity. (f) Any increase in the seating capacity of an existing sports facility having a permanent seating http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch03 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 23 of 27 capacity of at least 50,000 spectators is exempt from the provisions of this section, provided that such an increase does not increase permanent seating capacity by more than 5 percent per year and not to exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period, and provided that the sports facility notifies the appropriate local government within which the facility is located of the increase at least 6 months prior to the initial use of the increased seating, in order to permit the appropriate local government to develop a traffic management plan for the traffic generated by the increase. Any traffic management plan shall be consistent with the local comprehensive plan, the regional policy plan, and the state comprehensive plan. (g) Any expansion in the permanent seating capacity or additional improved parking facilities of an existing sports facility is exempt from the provisions of this section, if the following conditions exist: 1.a. The sports facility had a permanent seating capacity on January 1, 1991, of at least 41,000 spectator seats; b. The sum of such expansions in permanent seating capacity does not exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period and does not exceed a cumulative total of 20 percent for any such expansions; or c. The increase in additional improved parking facilities is a one-time addition and does not exceed 3,500 parking spaces serving the sports facility; and 2. The local government having jurisdiction of the sports facility includes in the development order or development permit approving such expansion under this paragraph a finding of fact that the proposed expansion is consistent with the transportation, water, sewer and stormwater drainage provisions of the approved local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations relating to those provisions. Any owner or developer who intends to rely on this statutory exemption shall provide to the department a copy of the local government application for a development permit. Within 45 days of receipt of the application, the department shall render to the local government an advisory and nonbinding opinion, in writing, stating whether, in the department's opinion, the prescribed conditions exist for an exemption under this paragraph. The local government shall render the development order approving each such expansion to the department. The owner, developer, or department may appeal the local government development order pursuant to s. 380.07, within 45 days after the order is rendered. The scope of review shall be limited to the determination of whether the conditions prescribed in this paragraph exist. If any sports facility expansion undergoes development of regional impact review, all previous expansions which were exempt under this paragraph shall be included in the development of regional impact review. (h) Expansion to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b), port transportation facilities and projects listed in s. 311.07(3)(b), and intermodal transportation facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3) are exempt from the provisions of this section when such expansions, projects, or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans that are in compliance with the provisions of s. 163.3178. (25) AREAWIDE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT.-- (a) An authorized developer may submit an areawide development of regional impact to be reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in this section. The areawide development-of-regional-impact review shall include an areawide development plan in addition to any other information required under this section. After review and approval of an areawide development of regional impact under this section, all development within the defined planning area shall conform to the approved areawide development plan and development order. Individual developments that conform to the approved areawide development plan shall not be required to undergo further development-of-regional-impact review, unless otherwise provided in the development order. As used in this subsection, the term: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 24 of 27 1. "Areawide development plan" means a plan of development that, at a minimum: a. Encompasses a defined planning area approved pursuant to this subsection that will include at least two or more developments; b. Maps and defines the land uses proposed, including the amount of development by use and development phasing; c. Integrates a capital improvements program for transportation and other public facilities to ensure development staging contingent on availability of facilities and services; d. Incorporates land development regulation, covenants, and other restrictions adequate to protect resources and facilities of regional and state significance; and e. Specifies responsibilities and identifies the mechanisms for carrying out all commitments in the areawide development plan and for compliance with all conditions of any areawide development order. 2. "Developer" means any person or association of persons, including a governmental agency as defined in s. 380.031(6), that petitions for authorization to file an application for development approval for an areawide development plan. (b) A developer may petition for authorization to submit a proposed areawide development of regional impact for a defined planning area in accordance with the following requirements: 1. A petition shall be submitted to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency. 2. A public hearing or joint public hearing shall be held if required by paragraph (e), with appropriate notice, before the affected local government. 3. The state land planning agency shall apply the following criteria for evaluating a petition: a. Whether the developer is financially capable of processing the application for development approval through final approval pursuant to this section. b. Whether the defined planning area and anticipated development therein appear to be of a character, magnitude, and location that a proposed areawide development plan would be in the public interest. Any public interest determination under this criterion is preliminary and not binding on the state land planning agency, regional planning agency, or local government. 4. The state land planning agency shall develop and make available standard forms for petitions and applications for development approval for use under this subsection. (c) Any person may submit a petition to a local government having jurisdiction over an area to be developed, requesting that government to approve that person as a developer, whether or not any or all development will be undertaken by that person, and to approve the area as appropriate for an areawide development of regional impact. (d) A general purpose local government with jurisdiction over an area to be considered in an areawide development of regional impact shall not have to petition itself for authorization to prepare and consider an application for development approval for an areawide development plan. However, such a local government shall initiate the preparation of an application only: 1. After scheduling and conducting a public hearing as specified in paragraph (e); and 2. After conducting such hearing, finding that the planning area meets the standards and criteria http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 25 of 27 pursuant to subparagraph (b)3. for determining that an areawide development plan will be in the public interest. (e) The local government shall schedule a public hearing within 60 days after receipt of the petition. The public hearing shall be advertised at least 30 days prior to the hearing. In addition to the public hearing notice by the local government, the petitioner, except when the petitioner is a local government, shall provide actual notice to each person owning land within the proposed areawide development plan at least 30 days prior to the hearing. If the petitioner is a local government, or local governments pursuant to an interlocal agreement, notice of the public hearing shall be provided by the publication of an advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation that meets the requirements of this paragraph. The advertisement must be no less than one-quarter page in a standard size or tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement must be in type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement shall not be published in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The advertisement must be published in a newspaper of general paid circulation in the county and of general interest and readership in the community, not one of limited subject matter, pursuant to chapter 50. Whenever possible, the advertisement must appear in a newspaper that is published at least 5 days a week, unless the only newspaper in the community is published less than 5 days a week. The advertisement must be in substantially the form used to advertise amendments to comprehensive plans pursuant to s. 163.3184. The local government shall specifically notify in writing the regional planning agency and the state land planning agency at least 30 days prior to the public hearing. At the public hearing, all interested parties may testify and submit evidence regarding the petitioner's qualifications, the need for and benefits of an areawide development of regional impact, and such other issues relevant to a full consideration of the petition. If more than one local government has jurisdiction over the defined planning area in an areawide development plan, the local governments shall hold a joint public hearing. Such hearing shall address, at a minimum, the need to resolve conflicting ordinances or comprehensive plans, if any. The local government holding the joint hearing shall comply with the following additional requirements: 1. The notice of the hearing shall be published at least 60 days in advance of the hearing and shall specify where the petition may be reviewed. 2. The notice shall be given to the state land planning agency, to the applicable regional planning agency, and to such other persons as may have been designated by the state land planning agency as entitled to receive such notices. 3. A public hearing date shall be set by the appropriate local government at the next scheduled meeting. (f) Following the public hearing, the local government shall issue a written order, appealable under s. 380.07, which approves, approves with conditions, or denies the petition. It shall approve the petitioner as the developer if it finds that the petitioner and defined planning area meet the standards and criteria, consistent with applicable law, pursuant to subparagraph (b)3. (g) The local government shall submit any order which approves the petition, or approves the petition with conditions, to the petitioner, to all owners of property within the defined planning area, to the regional planning agency, and to the state land planning agency within 30 days after the order becomes effective. (h) The petitioner, an owner of property within the defined planning area, the appropriate regional planning agency by vote at a regularly scheduled meeting, or the state land planning agency may appeal the decision of the local government to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission by filing a notice of appeal with the commission. The procedures established in s. 380.07 shall be followed for such an appeal. (i) After the time for appeal of the decision has run, an approved developer may submit an application for development approval for a proposed areawide development of regional impact for land within the defined planning area, pursuant to subsection (6). Development undertaken in http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 26 of 27 conformance with an areawide development order issued under this section shall not require further development-of-regional-impact review. (j) In reviewing an application for a proposed areawide development of regional impact, the regional planning agency shall evaluate, and the local government shall consider, the following criteria, in addition to any other criteria set forth in this section: 1. Whether the developer has demonstrated its legal, financial, and administrative ability to perform any commitments it has made in the application for a proposed areawide development of regional impact. 2. Whether the developer has demonstrated that all property owners within the defined planning area consent or do not object to the proposed areawide development of regional impact. 3. Whether the area and the anticipated development are consistent with the applicable local, regional, and state comprehensive plans, except as provided for in paragraph (k). (k) In addition to the requirements of subsection (14), a development order approving, or approving with conditions, a proposed areawide development of regional impact shall specify the approved land uses and the amount of development approved within each land use category in the defined planning area. The development order shall incorporate by reference the approved areawide development plan. The local government shall not approve an areawide development plan that is inconsistent with the local comprehensive plan, except that a local government may amend its comprehensive plan pursuant to paragraph (6)(b). (1) Any owner of property within the defined planning area may withdraw his or her consent to the areawide development plan at any time prior to local government approval, with or without conditions, of the petition; and the plan, the areawide development order, and the exemption from development-of-regional-impact review of individual projects under this section shall not thereafter apply to the owner's property. After the areawide development order is issued, a landowner may withdraw his or her consent only with the approval of the local government. (m) If the developer of an areawide development of regional impact is a general purpose local government with jurisdiction over the land area included within the areawide development proposal and if no interest in the land within the land area is owned, leased, or otherwise controlled by a person, corporate or natural, for the purpose of mining or beneficiation of minerals, then: 1. Demonstration of property owner consent or lack of objection to an areawide development plan shall not be required; and 2. The option to withdraw consent does not apply, and all property and development within the areawide development planning area shall be subject to the areawide plan and to the development order conditions. (n) After a development order approving an areawide development plan is received, changes shall be subject to the provisions of subsection (19), except that the percentages and numerical criteria shall be double those listed in paragraph (19)(b). (26) ABANDONMENT OF DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT.--There is hereby established a process to abandon a development of regional impact and its associated development orders. A development of regional impact and its associated development orders may be proposed to be abandoned by the owner or developer. The local government in which the development of regional impact is located also may propose to abandon the development of regional impact, provided that the local government gives individual written notice to each development-of- regional-impact owner and developer of record, and provided that no such owner or developer objects in writing to the local government prior to or at the public hearing pertaining to abandonment of the development of regional impact. The state land planning agency is authorized to promulgate rules that shall include, but not be limited to, criteria for determining http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statutes/.../SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO3 80->Section%200 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0380->Section 06: Online Sunshine Page 27 of 27 whether to grant, grant with conditions, or deny a proposal to abandon, and provisions to ensure that the developer satisfies all applicable conditions of the development order and adequately mitigates for the impacts of the development. If there is no existing development within the development of regional impact at the time of abandonment and no development within the development of regional impact is proposed by the owner or developer after such abandonment, an abandonment order shall not require the owner or developer to contribute any land, funds, or public facilities as a condition of such abandonment order. The rules shall also provide a procedure for filing notice of the abandonment pursuant to s. 28.222 with the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which the development of regional impact is located. Any decision by a local government concerning the abandonment of a development of regional impact shall be subject to an appeal pursuant to s. 380.07. The issues in any such appeal shall be confined to whether the provisions of this subsection or any rules promulgated thereunder have been satisfied. (27) RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER A DEVELOPMENT ORDER.--If a developer or owner is in doubt as to his or her rights, responsibilities, and obligations under a development order and the development order does not clearly define his or her rights, responsibilities, and obligations, the developer or owner may request participation in resolving the dispute through the dispute resolution process outlined in s. 186.509. The Department of Community Affairs shall be notified by certified mail of any meeting held under the process provided for by this subsection at least 5 days before the meeting. History.--s. 6, ch. 72-317; s. 2, ch. 74-326; s. 5, ch. 75-167; s. 1, ch. 76-69; s. 2, ch. 77-215; s. 148, ch. 79-400; s. 3, ch. 80-313; s. 22, ch. 83-222; s. 4, ch. 83-308; s. 1, ch. 84-331; s. 43, ch. 85-55; s. 15, ch. 86-191; s. 1, ch. 88-164; s. 1, ch. 89-375; s. 1, ch. 89-536; s. 52, ch. 90- 331; s. 20, ch. 91-192; s. 20, ch. 91-305; s. 1, ch. 91-309; s. 15, ch. 92-129; s. 2, ch. 93-95; s. 52, ch. 93-206; s. 345, ch. 94-356; s. 1029, ch. 95-148; s. 11, ch. 95-149; s. 9, ch. 95-322; s. 3, ch. 95-412; s. 114, ch. 96-410; s. 10, ch. 96-416; s. 1, ch. 97-28; s. 7, ch. 97-253; s. 52, ch. 97-278; s. 8, ch. 98-146; ss. 26, 31, ch. 98-176; s. 71, ch. 99-251; s. 7, ch. 99-378. Welcome • Session • Committees • Legislators • Information Center • Statutes and Constitution • Lobbyist Information Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright © 2000 State of Florida. Contact us. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/ ... /SEC06.HTM&Title=->2000->ChO380->Section%200 12/01/2000 Harriger, Sandy From: Hardin, Cyndi Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:43 AM To: Harriger, Sandy Subject: RE: DRI mailing we need to notify the applicant';s rep-I think it is Tim Johnson. Also, to TBRPC rep-a letter from him should be in the file. Also, Dept of Community Affairs-we will have to call them to find out who is the appropriate contact. thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Harriger, Sandy Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 8:44 AM To: Hardin, Cyndi Subject: FW: DRI mailing Cyndi, see email below from Gwen in City Clerk's Office - do you want anyone else notified of Commission Action? Sandy Harriger Admin. Analyst Planning Department -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, February 08, 20018:31 AM To: Harriger, Sandy Subject: RE: DRI mailing I don't know anything really about DRls. You need to ask Cyndi. Sorry. -----Original Message----- From: Harriger, Sandy Sent: Thursday, February 08, 20018:16 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: DRI mailing Gina, did you want anyone else notified of the Commission Action on Park Place DRI? Sandy Harriger Admin. Analyst Planning Department -----Original Message----- From: Legters, Gwen Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 20015:21 PM To: Harriger, Sandy Subject: DRI mailing I pulled the CDB public hearing file & mailed to the following: Park Place Land, Ltd., 3225 Aviation Ave., Ste 700, Coconut Grove DCA, 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd, Tally & John M. Meyer, DRI coord., TBRPC on Koger Blvd. If that's not right I'll send some more copies to your addresses. Gwen Legters Phone: (727) 562-4095 Fax: (727) 562-4086 email: glegters@clearwater-fl.com statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 101: Online Sunshine The 2000 Florida Statutes Page 1 of 1 Order Title XIII Chapter 187 View Entire Chapter PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT State Comprehensive Plan 187.101 Description of plan; legislative intent; construction and application of plan.-- (1) The State Comprehensive Plan shall provide long-range policy guidance for the orderly social, economic, and physical growth of the state. It shall be reviewed biennially by the Legislature, and implementation of its policies shall require legislative action unless otherwise specifically authorized by the constitution or law. (2) The State Comprehensive Plan is intended to be a direction-setting document. Its policies may be implemented only to the extent that financial resources are provided pursuant to legislative appropriation or grants or appropiriations of any other public or private entities. The plan does not create regulatory authority or authorize the adoption of agency rules, criteria, or standards not otherwise authorized by law. (3) The goals and policies contained in the State Comprehensive Plan shall be reasonably applied where they are economically and environmentally feasible, not contrary to the public interest, and consistent with the protection of private property rights. The plan shall be construed and applied as a whole, and no specific goal or policy in the plan shall be construed or applied in isolation from the other goals and policies in the plan. History.--s. 1, ch. 85-57. Welcome • Session • Committees • Legislators • Information Center • Statutes and Constitution • Lobbyist Information Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright © 2000 State of Florida. Contact us. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut ... /SEC 101.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2010 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine The 2000 Florida Statutes Page 1 of 23 Order Title XIII Chapter 187 View Entire Chapter PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT State Comprehensive Plan 187.201 State Comprehensive Plan adopted.--The Legislature hereby adopts as the State Comprehensive Plan the following specific goals and policies: (1) EDUCATION.-- (a) Goal.--The creation of an educational environment which is intended to provide adequate skills and knowledge for students to develop their full potential, embrace the highest ideas and accomplishments, make a positive contribution to society, and promote the advancement of knowledge and human dignity. (b) Policies. -- 1. Provide for systematic evaluation of programs and systems which will identify successful programs and programs requiring enhancement. 2. Develop effective mechanisms to assess achievement levels. 3. Ensure salaries, benefits, and other incentives which will attract and retain high-quality educators in the numbers needed to meet the educational needs of an increasing population. 4. Establish certification and teaching requirements which are compatible with the highest levels of student performance. 5. Increase student performance as measured by accepted standard criteria. 6. Provide alternatives to traditional teaching methods so that low achievers may experience educational success and create a work environment conducive to imaginative, creative teaching. 7. By 1995, increase opportunities for continued learning for all age groups by 15 percent and increase the program completion rate by 10 percent. 8. Promote educational and cultural enrichment and recreational activities outside traditional systems through the increased use of community and educational facilities and develop creative alternatives to educational programs in order to serve a larger segment of the population. 9. Increase the articulation and information exchange among all levels of public education. 10. Develop programs to meet the educational needs of elderly persons. 11. Continue to support the development of research-based programs for identifying and preventing dropouts in public school and in higher education institutions. http://vrww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 2 of 23 12. Invest in the educational system today to teach the basic and advanced skills that will ensure its students are prepared to become productive citizens and that will attract the industry of tomorrow. 13. Provide a system to disseminate knowledge to solve economic and community problems, through linkages between business, local communities, and institutions of higher education. 14. Pursue funds for research to be conducted in the state. 15. Improve the quality of libraries in public schools, communities, and colleges and universities. 16. Education K-12: a. Expand early learning experiences to enhance student achievement. b. Provide access to a comprehensive curriculum for all high school students. c. Provide appropriate education programs and pathways for handicapped students, exceptional students, and students having learning disabilities and other special learning needs. d. Develop procedures for identifying gifted students. e. Develop appropriate counseling for students at all education levels. f. Implement research-based dropout prevention programs in all school districts. g. Identify and encourage policies which raise the expectations, performance, and motivation of socioeconomically and academically disadvantaged students. h. Maintain a classroom environment, including student discipline, that is conducive to learning, with appropriate use of alternative education opportunities. i. Provide the optimum amount of learning time necessary to improve student performance. j. Increase the use of technology in education to make instruction more effective. k. Provide adequate instructional materials, equipment, and facilities to meet the needs of all students. 1. Provide for systematic evaluation of and reporting on educational programs, delivery systems, and outcomes at school, district, and state levels. m. Ensure standards of excellence for teacher education and certification, and continuing professional development activities for all school personnel. n. Provide a management support system which will ensure excellence in the performance of school principals and other educational managers. o. Strengthen citizen involvement at all levels in public education. p. Provide policies, programs, and curricula which prepare students to understand and communicate with people of other nations and to compete successfully in the international economy. 17. Postsecondary education: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 . statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 3 of 23 a. Ensure that the college-level curriculum of the community colleges corresponds to the basic studies of the state universities. b. Maintain and strengthen the current pattern of matriculation from community colleges to universities. c. Afford increased opportunities for upper-division and graduate-level studies. d. Provide admission standards for state universities that recognize the rigorous academic preparation necessary to meet the challenges of university coursework. e. Encourage Florida's talented students to obtain their postsecondary education in Florida. f. Ensure that universities provide a core curriculum in the liberal arts that applies to all lower- division students. g. Include in the university system teaching, research, and service. h. Establish and maintain components of national prominence in the university system. i. Ensure that the university system provides reasonable geographic access consistent with other policies. j. Recognize private universities and colleges as an important component of Florida's higher educational system. k. Develop postsecondary consortia whenever possible among universities, community colleges, and private institutions. 1. Expand the participation of private partnerships in recruiting additional nationally recognized faculty such as eminent scholars. 18. 'Career education: a. Provide a uniform and coordinated system of secondary and zdegree career education. b. Provide that vocational programs focus their efforts toward student placement in occupations related to their vocational training. c. Ensure that vocational programs provide up-to-date instruction on the newest equipment. d. Provide a'career education program designed to accommodate Florida's changing technological, occupational, and educational needs. e. Encourage vocational institutions to coordinate their programs with the needs of business and industry and provide business and industry the opportunity to assist in developing curricula for 'career education. (2) CHILDREN.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall provide programs sufficient to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all of its children. (b) Policies. -- http://www,leg.state.fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 4 of 23 1. Decrease the number of children at risk of becoming delinquent, abused, or otherwise dependent on society through preventive counseling services and day treatment programs. 2. Treat no children or adolescents in state mental health institutions, and provide that the primary emphasis on mental health treatment of children shall be community-based services. 3. Provide training in normal child development and family relationship skills in public education programs at all levels. 4. Sponsor seminars and clinics for parents on positive ways to handle stress related to child- rearing. 5. Encourage prevention programs in schools and community centers to decrease the incidence of teenage pregnancy and provide programs to reduce the detrimental effects of teenage pregnancy. 6. Develop and participate in alcohol and drug prevention programs in the school system and in the community. 7. Encourage the development and public awareness of community support networks for parents and children at risk of abuse or drug or alcohol dependency. 8. Target funds for intensive prevention programs to families at risk of child abuse or substance abuse problems. 9. Develop and expand prevention, identification, and treatment programs for substance abusers who are children or adolescents. 10. Encourage private sector involvement in prevention programs through employee assistance programs. 11. Promote the preservation and strengthening of families by providing programs designed to reduce the occurrence of abuse and neglect. 12. Promote educational programs to increase awareness in children of the damage to their minds and bodies caused from the use of alcohol, drugs, and tobacco. 13. Provide timely intervention and treatment services in the appropriate setting when incidents of abuse or neglect do occur. 14. Provide a comprehensive range of children's mental health services, from prevention programs to the less-intensive residential programs, with minimal use of institutional settings. 15. Provide secure, intensive treatment facilities for children and adolescents who, due to their aggressive or violent behavior, would otherwise be treated in placements in other states or in institutional settings in Florida. 16. Emphasize prevention and nonresidential services directed toward keeping children in their homes and communities, with each child's protection and well-being as the first priority. 17. Provide a strong, interagency case-management system, including appropriate state agencies, law enforcement, school districts, and community mental health centers, to ensure the proper placement of children in need of services. 18. Develop a community-oriented juvenile justice system which meets the individual needs of referred and committed youth offenders and which treats juveniles in the least restrictive manner while ensuring the safety of the community by holding juveniles accountable for their behavior http://vvww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 5 of 23 and by linking reentry into the community to stable behavior. 19. Develop a child abuse service system that will detect abuse and neglect in the early stages, intervene promptly and effectively in both family and nonfamily settings, and apply a multidisciplinary child abuse prevention/treatment team approach. 20. Expand prenatal and perinatal screening programs in order to increase the number of at-risk mothers and infants who receive prevention services. 21. Increase the state's capacity to provide training and support services to developmentally disabled children and adolescents in the community. 22. Ensure that all current and new programs for children and adolescents are as family-focused and supportive of the family unit as feasible without exposing the child to unacceptable physical and emotional risks. 23. Expand the range of programs currently available for children with physical handicaps other than developmental disabilities, learning disabilities, and emotional problems. 24. Ensure the safety of children and the quality of services they receive in residential, day care, and treatment programs through necessary and appropriate regulations. 25. Establish a system to determine and evaluate client outcomes and program effectiveness for all programs serving children, youth, and families. 26. Provide for a systematic outcome evaluation of programs and services to children. (3) FAMILIES.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall strengthen the family and promote its economic independence. (b) Policies.-- 1. Eliminate state policies which cause voluntary family separations. 2. Promote concepts to stabilize the family unit to strengthen bonds between parents and children. 3. Promote home care services for the sick and disabled. 4. Provide financial support for alternative child care services. 5. Increase direct parental involvement in K-12 education programs. 6. Promote family dispute resolution centers. 7. Support displaced homemaker programs. 8. Provide increased assurance that child support payments will be made. 9. Actively develop job opportunities, community work experience programs, and job training programs for persons receiving governmental financial assistance. 10. Direct local law enforcement authorities and district mental health councils to increase efforts to prevent family violence and to adequately punish the guilty party. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 . statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 6 of 23 11. Provide financial, mental health, and other support for victims of family violence. (4) THE ELDERLY.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall improve the quality of life for its elderly citizens by promoting improved provision of services, with an emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency. (b) Policies. -- 1. Increase the percentage of elderly persons who are living self-sufficiently, with emphasis upon those individuals aged 75 years and older. 2. Develop and implement preventive services and strategies to maximize individual independence and to delay or to avoid institutionalization. 3. Strengthen the caregiving capacity of family members and other informal support providers in order to prevent neglect, exploitation, and abuse of elderly persons. 4. Support cost-effective community alternatives to long-term institutional care. 5. Integrate health care and social service delivery systems to provide comprehensive coordinated, cost-effective care that is responsive to individual needs. 6. Implement a case-management system which will assure delivery of appropriate services, with an emphasis on individual needs; control access to long-term care services; and monitor expenditures. 7. Promote geriatric health care education programs to improve quality of care. 8. Ensure the right of patients, to the extent feasible, to determine the course of their own medical treatment. 9. Provide services designed to increase the involvement of elderly persons in the day-to-day life of the community, to ensure their adequate housing, and to improve employment opportunities for those elderly persons who are willing and able to work. 10. Improve and expand transportation services to increase mobility of elderly persons. 11. Increase the participation of the elderly in education and social service programs serving children. 12. Provide services and target resources to those elderly persons with the greatest need. 13. Ensure the adequacy of health and social services through nonduplicative licensure and certification activities in order to provide for systematic regulatory oversight. (5) HOUSING.-- (a) Goal.--The public and private sectors shall increase the affordability and availability of housing for low-income and moderate-income persons, including citizens in rural areas, while at the same time encouraging self-sufficiency of the individual and assuring environmental and structural quality and cost-effective operations. (b) Policies.-- 1. Eliminate public policies which result in housing discrimination, and develop policies which http://vAvw.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 7 of 23 encourage housing opportunities for all Florida's citizens. 2. Diminish the use of institutions to house persons by promoting deinstitutionalization to the maximum extent possible. 3. Increase the supply of safe, affordable, and sanitary housing for low-income and moderate- income persons and elderly persons by alleviating housing shortages, recycling older houses and redeveloping residential neighborhoods, identifying housing needs, providing incentives to the private sector to build affordable housing, encouraging public-private partnerships to maximize the creation of affordable housing, and encouraging research into low-cost housing construction techniques, considering life-cycle operating costs. 4. Reduce the cost of housing construction by eliminating unnecessary regulatory practices which add to the cost of housing. (6) HEALTH.-- (a)1. Goal.--Healthy residents who protect their own health and the health of others and who actively participate in recovering their own health when they become ill. 2. Policies. -- a. Individuals are fundamentally responsible for their own health, but they need encouragement and may need financial support from government. b. The state shall develop mechanisms whereby all Florida residents can participate in a plan of adequate health care coverage to which they contribute financially, based on their ability to pay. c. All Florida residents should be supported through education and other means to develop and maintain healthy lifestyles. d. All Florida students should be provided with comprehensive, continuous health education in prekindergarten through grade 12 settings. e. Treatment of illness is a partnership between health care providers and patients in which individual patients participate in decisions related to their health care. In this process, patients and health care providers have mutual rights and responsibilities. (b)1. Goal.--An environment which supports a healthy population and which does not cause illness. 2. Policies. -- a. Every Florida resident has a right to breathe clean air, drink pure water, and eat nutritious food. b. The state should assure a safe and healthful environment through monitoring and regulating activities which impact the quality of the state's air, water, and food. c. Government shall ensure that future growth does not cause the environment to adversely affect the health of the population. d. Every employer shall provide a safe and healthful workplace. (c)1. Goal.--Health care services which are of high quality, reasonably accessible, and adequate to meet the needs of the public. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 8 of 23 2. Policies. -- a. Where feasible, resources will be redirected to programs and services that prevent illness and intervene in the early stages of disease. b. The public shall have access to affordable health care. c. Each pregnant woman in this state has a right to adequate prenatal care in order to protect her health and to help her child begin life healthy. d. The state shall promote the availability of needed health care professionals and services in medically underserved areas. e. The responsibility for ensuring good quality, accessibility, and availability of health care services is shared among health care practitioners, institutions, patients, and government. f. Government shall provide for the orderly growth and development of health care facilities and services through health planning, growth management, and regulation. g. Government shall establish a public health infrastructure of facilities, equipment, and personnel necessary to provide for community health needs. (d)1. Goal.--Health costs which are contained to a level appropriate to the financial resources of the state and its residents. 2. Policies. -- a. The primary long-range strategy for containing health care costs shall be prevention of avoidable illness and disability. b. The state shall promote the development of a rational financing system for health care which minimizes the shifting of costs, discourages inappropriate utilization, reduces administrative costs, and contains the costs of new technology. c. The state shall encourage the delivery of health care services in a manner that enables patients to establish reasonable expectations of outcome and enables health care providers to focus on the health of their patients. (7) PUBLIC SAFETY.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall protect the public by preventing, discouraging, and punishing criminal behavior, lowering the highway death rate, and protecting lives and property from natural and manmade disasters. (b) Policies. -- 1. Maintain safe and secure prisons and other correctional facilities with the required number of well-trained staff. 2. Provide effective alternatives to incarceration for appropriate offenders and encourage victim restitution. 3. Make the corrections system as financially cost-effective as possible through prison industries and other inmate work programs and through contractual agreements with public and private vendors. http://www.leg.state.fl-us/Statut ... /SEC20I.HTM&Title=->2000->ChOI87->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 9 of 23 4. Continue to monitor educational and vocational training of inmates to increase the likelihood of successful reintegration into the community. 5. Provide all inmates with access to adequate health care, including diagnostic and treatment programs for offenders suffering from substance abuse or psychological disorders. 6. Provide incentives to attract and retain high-quality law enforcement and correctional officers. 7. Emphasize the reduction of serious crime, particularly violent, organized, economic, and drug- related crimes. 8. Increase the level of training and technical assistance provided to law enforcement agencies. 9. Increase crime prevention efforts to enhance the protection of individual personal safety and property. 10. Emphasize and protect the rights of crime victims. 11. Continue to implement coordinated and integrated strategies to combat organized crime, economic crime, and drug trafficking. 12. Expand the state's provisions for the protection of witnesses in criminal cases, especially organized crime cases. 13. Strengthen the state's commitment to pursue, both criminally and civilly, those individuals who profit from economic crimes, in a manner that keeps pace with the level and sophistication of these criminal activities. 14. Improve the efficiency of law enforcement through the establishment of a close communication and coordination system among agencies and a comprehensive reporting system for such types of criminal activities as forcible felonies and organized, economic, and drug crimes. 15. Improve the effectiveness of the delinquent juvenile justice system commitment programs to reduce recidivism of juveniles who would otherwise be recommitted to state supervision. 16. Utilize alternative sentencing and dispute resolution when appropriate, particularly in civil disputes and minor criminal violations. 17. Increase the state's commitment to stringent enforcement of laws against drunken or drugged driving. 18. Expand public awareness campaigns that will emphasize the dangers of driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. 19. Promote efforts to encourage the use of personal safety restraint devices for all persons traveling in motor vehicles. 20. Improve the enforcement of and compliance with safe highway speed limits. 21. Provide effective and efficient driver licensing systems, including a reliable testing system designed to preclude unqualified drivers from receiving driver's licenses. 22. Require local governments, in cooperation with regional and state agencies, to prepare advance plans for the safe evacuation of coastal residents. 23. Require local governments, in cooperation with regional and state agencies, to adopt plans and policies to protect public and private property and human lives from the effects of natural http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 10 of 23 disasters. (8) WATER RESOURCES.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall assure the availability of an adequate supply of water for all competing uses deemed reasonable and beneficial and shall maintain the functions of natural systems and the overall present level of surface and ground water quality. Florida shall improve and restore the quality of waters not presently meeting water quality standards. (b) Policies.— 1. Ensure the safety and quality of drinking water supplies and promote the development of reverse osmosis and desalinization technologies for developing water supplies. 2. Identify and protect the functions of water recharge areas and provide incentives for their conservation. 3. Encourage the development of local and regional water supplies within water management districts instead of transporting surface water across district boundaries. 4. Protect and use natural water systems in lieu of structural alternatives and restore modified systems. 5. Ensure that new development is compatible with existing local and regional water supplies. 6. Establish minimum seasonal flows and levels for surface watercourses with primary consideration given to the protection of natural resources, especially marine, estuarine, and aquatic ecosystems. 7. Discourage the channelization, diversion, or damming of natural riverine systems. 8. Encourage the development of a strict floodplain management program by state and local governments designed to preserve hydrologically significant wetlands and other natural floodplain features. 9. Protect aquifers from depletion and contamination through appropriate regulatory programs and through incentives. 10. Protect surface and groundwater quality and quantity in the state. 11. Promote water conservation as an integral part of water management programs as well as the use and reuse of water of the lowest acceptable quality for the purposes intended. 12. Eliminate the discharge of inadequately treated wastewater and stormwater runoff into the waters of the state. 13. Identify and develop alternative methods of wastewater treatment, disposal, and reuse of wastewater to reduce degradation of water resources. 14. Reserve from use that water necessary to support essential nonwithdrawal demands, including navigation, recreation, and the protection of fish and wildlife. (9) COASTAL AND MARINE RESOURCES.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall ensure that development and marine resource use and beach access improvements in coastal areas do not endanger public safety or important natural resources. http://www.leg. state. fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 11 of 23 Florida shall, through acquisition and access improvements, make available to the state's population additional beaches and marine environment, consistent with sound environmental planning. (b) Policies.-- 1. Accelerate public acquisition of coastal and beachfront land where necessary to protect coastal and marine resources or to meet projected public demand. 2. Ensure the public's right to reasonable access to beaches. 3. Avoid the expenditure of state funds that subsidize development in high-hazard coastal areas. 4. Protect coastal resources, marine resources, and dune systems from the adverse effects of development. 5. Develop and implement a comprehensive system of coordinated planning, management, and land acquisition to ensure the integrity and continued attractive image of coastal areas. 6. Encourage land and water uses which are compatible with the protection of sensitive coastal resources. 7. Protect and restore long-term productivity of marine fisheries habitat and other aquatic resources. 8. Avoid the exploration and development of mineral resources which threaten marine, aquatic, and estuarine resources. 9. Prohibit development and other activities which disturb coastal dune systems, and ensure and promote the restoration of coastal dune systems that are damaged. 10. Give priority in marine development to water-dependent uses over other uses. (10) NATURAL SYSTEMS AND RECREATIONAL LANDS.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall protect and acquire unique natural habitats and ecological systems, such as wetlands, tropical hardwood hammocks, palm hammocks, and virgin longleaf pine forests, and restore degraded natural systems to a functional condition. (b) Policies.-- 1. Conserve forests, wetlands, fish, marine life, and wildlife to maintain their environmental, economic, aesthetic, and recreational values. 2. Acquire, retain, manage, and inventory public lands to provide recreation, conservation, and related public benefits. 3. Prohibit the destruction of endangered species and protect their habitats. 4. Establish an integrated regulatory program to assure the survival of endangered and threatened species within the state. 5. Promote the use of agricultural practices which are compatible with the protection of wildlife and natural systems. 6. Encourage multiple use of forest resources, where appropriate, to provide for timber http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 12 of 23 production, recreation, wildlife habitat, watershed protection, erosion control, and maintenance of water quality. 7. Protect and restore the ecological functions of wetlands systems to ensure their long-term environmental, economic, and recreational value. 8. Promote restoration of the Everglades system and of the hydrological and ecological functions of degraded or substantially disrupted surface waters. 9. Develop and implement a comprehensive planning, management, and acquisition program to ensure the integrity of Florida's river systems. 10. Emphasize the acquisition and maintenance of ecologically intact systems in all land and water planning, management, and regulation. 11. Expand state and local efforts to provide recreational opportunities to urban areas, including the development of activity-based parks. 12. Protect and expand park systems throughout the state. 13. Encourage the use of public and private financial and other resources for the development of recreational opportunities at the state and local levels. (11) AIR QUALITY.-- (a) Goa/.--Florida shall comply with all national air quality standards by 1987, and by 1992 meet standards which are more stringent than 1985 state standards. (b) Policies.-- 1. Improve air quality and maintain the improved level to safeguard human health and prevent damage to the natural environment. 2. Ensure that developments and transportation systems are consistent with the maintenance of optimum air quality. 3. Reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions and mitigate their effects on the natural and human environment. 4. Encourage the use of alternative energy resources that do not degrade air quality. 5. Ensure, at a minimum, that power plant fuel conversion does not result in higher levels of air pollution. (12) ENERGY.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall reduce its energy requirements through enhanced conservation and efficiency measures in all end-use sectors, while at the same time promoting an increased use of renewable energy resources. (b) Policies.-- 1. Continue to reduce per capita energy consumption. 2. Encourage and provide incentives for consumer and producer energy conservation and establish acceptable energy performance standards for buildings and energy consuming items. http://vvww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut ... /SEC20I.HTM&Title=->2000->ChOI87->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 13 of 23 3. Improve the efficiency of traffic flow on existing roads. 4. Ensure energy efficiency in transportation design and planning and increase the availability of more efficient modes of transportation. 5. Reduce the need for new power plants by encouraging end-use efficiency, reducing peak demand, and using cost-effective alternatives. 6. Increase the efficient use of energy in design and operation of buildings, public utility systems, and other infrastructure and related equipment. 7. Promote the development and application of solar energy technologies and passive solar design techniques. 8. Provide information on energy conservation through active media campaigns. 9. Promote the use and development of renewable energy resources. 10. Develop and maintain energy preparedness plans that will be both practical and effective under circumstances of disrupted energy supplies or unexpected price surges. (13) HAZARDOUS AND NONHAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE.-- (a) Goal.--All solid waste, including hazardous waste, wastewater, and all hazardous materials, shall be properly managed, and the use of landfills shall be eventually eliminated. (b) Policies.— 1. By 1994, reduce all volume of solid waste requiring disposal by 30 percent. 2. By 1994, provide in all counties a countywide solid waste collection system to discourage littering and the illegal dumping of solid waste. 3. Initiate programs to develop or expand recyclable material markets, especially those involving plastics, metals, paper, and glass. 4. Encourage and expedite the development of environmentally safe hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. 5. Identify and clean up hazardous waste sites. 6. Enforce and strengthen regulation of the generation, storage, treatment, disposal, and transportation of hazardous waste. 7. Establish a system for identifying the location, type, and quantity of hazardous materials. 8. Require all hazardous waste generators to properly manage their own wastes. 9. Encourage the research, development, and implementation of recycling, resource recovery, energy recovery, and other methods of using garbage, trash, sewage, slime, sludge, hazardous waste, and other waste. 10. Encourage coordination of intergovernmental and interstate waste management efforts. 11. Identify, develop, and encourage environmentally sound wastewater treatment and disposal http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut ... /SEC20I.HTM&Title=->2000->ChOI87->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 14 of 23 methods. 12. Develop a permanent system for households, small business, and other low-volume generators of hazardous waste to safely dispose of these materials in a convenient manner. 13. Encourage strict enforcement of hazardous waste laws and swift prosecution of violators. (14) MINING.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall protect its air, land, and water resources from the adverse effects of resource extraction and ensure that the disturbed areas are reclaimed or restored to beneficial use as soon as reasonably possible. (b) Policies. -- 1. Develop a comprehensive approach to the regulation of resource extraction. 2. Require mining operations to provide evidence of financial responsibility to ensure the reclamation of mined lands. 3. Require that disturbed areas, except those selected to be reclaimed by nature, be reclaimed to productive and beneficial use within a period determined by the state to be reasonable and practical. 4. Require state reclamation standards to be simple and well-coordinated and to be consistent with the protection of the public interest and conservation of natural resources. 5. Prohibit resource extraction which will result in an adverse effect on environmentally sensitive areas of the state which cannot be restored. 6. Minimize the effects of resource extraction upon ground and surface waters. 7. Protect human health from radiological or other adverse impacts associated with resource extraction. 8. Reduce the adverse impacts of waste disposal associated with resource extraction. 9. Require that mining and reclamation regulation recognizes the geological constraints and inherent differences in the types and locations of resources to be mined. (15) PROPERTY RIGHTS.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall protect private property rights and recognize the existence of legitimate and often competing public and private interests in land use regulations and other government action. (b) Policies. -- 1. Provide compensation, or other appropriate relief as provided by law, to a landowner for any governmental action that is determined to be an unreasonable exercise of the state's police power so as to constitute a taking. 2. Determine compensation or other relief by judicial proceeding rather than by administrative proceeding. 3. Encourage acquisition of lands by state or local government in cases where regulation will severely limit practical use of real property. http://vvww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 ' statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 15 of 23 (16) LAND USE.-- (a) Goal.--In recognition of the importance of preserving the natural resources and enhancing the quality of life of the state, development shall be directed to those areas which have in place, or have agreements to provide, the land and water resources, fiscal abilities, and service capacity to accommodate growth in an environmentally acceptable manner. (b) Policies.-- 1. Promote state programs, investments, and development and redevelopment activities which encourage efficient development and occur in areas which will have the capacity to service new population and commerce. 2. Develop a system of incentives and disincentives which encourages a separation of urban and rural land uses while protecting water supplies, resource development, and fish and wildlife habitats. 3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of living, working, shopping, and recreational activities. 4. Develop a system of intergovernmental negotiation for siting locally unpopular public and private land uses which considers the area of population served, the impact on land development patterns or important natural resources, and the cost-effectiveness of service delivery. 5. Encourage and assist local governments in establishing comprehensive impact-review procedures to evaluate the effects of significant development activities in their jurisdictions. 6. Consider, in land use planning and regulation, the impact of land use on water quality and quantity; the availability of land, water, and other natural resources to meet demands; and the potential for flooding. 7. Provide educational programs and research to meet state, regional, and local planning and growth-management needs. (17) URBAN AND DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION.-- (a) Goal.--In recognition of the importance of Florida's vital urban centers and of the need to develop and redevelop downtowns to the state's ability to use existing infrastructure and to accommodate growth in an orderly, efficient, and environmentally acceptable manner, Florida shall encourage the centralization of commercial, governmental, retail, residential, and cultural activities within downtown areas. (b) Policies.-- 1. Provide incentives to encourage private sector investment in the preservation and enhancement of downtown areas. 2. Assist local governments in the planning, financing, and implementation of development efforts aimed at revitalizing distressed downtown areas. 3. Promote state programs and investments which encourage redevelopment of downtown areas. 4. Promote and encourage communities to engage in a redesign step to include public participation of members of the community in envisioning redevelopment goals and design of the community core before redevelopment. http://vvww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 16 of 23 5. Ensure that local governments have adequate flexibility to determine and address their urban priorities within the state urban policy. 6. Enhance the linkages between land use, water use, and transportation planning in state, regional, and local plans for current and future designated urban areas. 7. Develop concurrency requirements that do not compromise public health and safety for urban areas that promote redevelopment efforts. 8. Promote processes for the state, general purpose local governments, school boards, and local community colleges to coordinate and cooperate regarding educational facilities in urban areas, including planning functions, the development of joint facilities, and the reuse of existing buildings. 9. Encourage the development of mass transit systems for urban centers, including multimodal transportation feeder systems, as a priority of local, metropolitan, regional, and state transportation planning. 10. Locate appropriate public facilities within urban centers to demonstrate public commitment to the centers and to encourage private sector development. 11. Integrate state programs that have been developed to promote economic development and neighborhood revitalization through incentives to promote the development of designated urban infill areas. 12. Promote infill development and redevelopment as an important mechanism to revitalize and sustain urban centers. (18) PUBLIC FACILITIES.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall protect the substantial investments in public facilities that already exist and shall plan for and finance new facilities to serve residents in a timely, orderly, and efficient manner. (b) Policies. -- 1. Provide incentives for developing land in a way that maximizes the uses of existing public facilities. 2. Promote rehabilitation and reuse of existing facilities, structures, and buildings as an alternative to new construction. 3. Allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis of the benefits received by existing and future residents. 4. Create a partnership among state government, local governments, and the private sector which would identify and build needed public facilities and allocate the costs of such facilities among the partners in proportion to the benefits accruing to each of them. 5. Encourage local government financial self-sufficiency in providing public facilities. 6. Identify and implement innovative but fiscally sound and cost-effective techniques for financing public facilities. 7. Encourage the development, use, and coordination of capital improvement plans by all levels of government. http://www.leg. state. fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 17 of 23 8. Take into consideration, in the assessed value of property, increased property values directly related to infrastructure expenditures by government. 9. Identify and use stable revenue sources which are also responsive to growth for financing public facilities. 10. Encourage development of graywater systems to extend existing sewerage capacity. (19) CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES.-- (a) Goal.--By 1995, Florida shall increase access to its historical and cultural resources and programs and encourage the development of cultural programs of national excellence. (b) Policies. -- 1. Promote and provide access throughout the state to performing arts, visual arts, and historic preservation and appreciation programs at a level commensurate with the state's economic development. 2. Develop a strategy for the construction of arts facilities based on an assessment which ranks regional and statewide capabilities and needs. 3. Ensure the identification, evaluation, and protection of archaeological folk heritage and historic resources properties of the state's diverse ethnic population. 4. Stimulate increased private sector participation and support for historical and cultural programs. 5. Encourage the rehabilitation and sensitive, adaptive use of historic properties through technical assistance and economic incentive programs. 6. Ensure that historic resources are taken into consideration in the planning of all capital programs and projects at all levels of government and that such programs and projects are carried out in a manner which recognizes the preservation of historic resources. (20) TRANSPORTATION.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall direct future transportation improvements to aid in the management of growth and shall have a state transportation system that integrates highway, air, mass transit, and other transportation modes. (b) Policies.-- 1. By 1995, establish a high-speed rail system that links the Tampa Bay area, Orlando, and Miami. 2. Coordinate transportation investments in major travel corridors to enhance system efficiency and minimize adverse environmental impacts. 3. Promote a comprehensive transportation planning process which coordinates state, regional, and local transportation plans. 4. Allow flexibility in state and local participation in funding of public transit projects and encourage construction and use of toll facilities in order to meet transportation needs. http://vvww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 18 of 23 5. Ensure that existing port facilities and airports are being used to the maximum extent possible before encouraging the expansion or development of new port facilities and airports to support economic growth. 6. Promote timely resurfacing and repair of roads and bridges to minimize costly reconstruction and to enhance safety. 7. Develop a revenue base for transportation which is consistent with the goals and policies of this plan. 8. Encourage the construction and utilization of a public transit system, including, but not limited to, a high-speed rail system, in lieu of the expansion of the highway system, where appropriate. 9. Ensure that the transportation system provides Florida's citizens and visitors with timely and efficient access to services, jobs, markets, and attractions. 10. Promote ride sharing by public and private sector employees. 11. Emphasize state transportation investments in major travel corridors and direct state transportation investments to contribute to efficient urban development. 12. Avoid transportation improvements which encourage or subsidize increased development in coastal high-hazard areas or in identified environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, floodways, or productive marine areas. 13. Coordinate transportation improvements with state, local, and regional plans. 14. Acquire advanced rights-of-way for transportation projects in designated transportation corridors consistent with state, regional, and local plans. 15. Promote effective coordination among various modes of transportation in urban areas to assist urban development and redevelopment efforts. (21) GOVERNMENTAL EFFICIENCY.-- (a) Goal.--Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount and quality of services required by the public. (b) Policies.-- 1. Encourage greater cooperation between, among, and within all levels of Florida government through the use of appropriate interlocal agreements and mutual participation for mutual benefit. 2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts which have uniform general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other governments and their taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of independent special taxing districts which do not meet these standards. 3. Encourage the use of municipal services taxing units and other dependent special districts to provide needed infrastructure where the fiscal capacity exists to support such an approach. 4. Eliminate regulatory activities that are not tied to specific public and natural resource protection needs. 5. Eliminate needless duplication of, and promote cooperation in, governmental activities between, among, and within state, regional, county, city, and other governmental units. http://vrww.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 19 of 23 6. Ensure, wherever possible, that the geographic boundaries of water management districts, regional planning councils, and substate districts of the executive departments shall be coterminous for related state or agency programs and functions and promote interagency agreements in order to reduce the number of districts and councils with jurisdiction in any one county. 7. Encourage and provide for the restructuring of city and county political jurisdictions with the goals of greater efficiency and high-quality and more equitable and responsive public service programs. 8. Replace multiple, small scale, economically inefficient local public facilities with regional facilities where they are proven to be more economical, particularly in terms of energy efficiency, and yet can retain the quality of service expected by the public. 9. Encourage greater efficiency and economy at all levels of government through adoption and implementation of effective records management, information management, and evaluation procedures. 10. Throughout government, establish citizen management efficiency groups and internal management groups to make recommendations for greater operating efficiencies and improved management practices. 11. Encourage governments to seek outside contracting on a competitive-bid basis when cost- effective and appropriate. 12. Discourage undue expansion of state government and make every effort to streamline state government in a cost-effective manner. 13. Encourage joint venture solutions to mutual problems between levels of government and private enterprise. (22) THE ECONOMY.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall promote an economic climate which provides economic stability, maximizes job opportunities, and increases per capita income for its residents. (b) Policies.— 1. Attract new job-producing industries, corporate headquarters, distribution and service centers, regional offices, and research and development facilities to provide quality employment for the residents of Florida. 2. Promote entrepreneurship and small and minority-owned business startup by providing technical and information resources, facilitating capital formation, and removing regulatory restraints which are unnecessary for the protection of consumers and society. 3. Maintain, as one of the state's primary economic assets, the environment, including clean air and water, beaches, forests, historic landmarks, and agricultural and natural resources. 4. Strengthen Florida's position in the world economy through attracting foreign investment and promoting international banking and trade. 5. Build on the state's attractiveness to make it a leader in the visual and performing arts and in all phases of film, television, and recording production. 6. Promote economic development for Florida residents through partnerships among education, business, industry, agriculture, and the arts. http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 20 of 23 7. Provide increased opportunities for training Florida's workforce to provide skilled employees for new and expanding business. 8. Promote economic self-sufficiency through training and educational programs which result in productive employment. 9. Promote cooperative employment arrangements between private employers and public sector employment efforts to provide productive, permanent employment opportunities for public assistance recipients through provisions of education opportunities, tax incentives, and employment training. 10. Provide for nondiscriminatory employment opportunities. 11. Provide quality child day care for public assistance families and others who need it in order to work. 12. Encourage the development of a business climate that provides opportunities for the growth and expansion of existing state industries, particularly those industries which are compatible with Florida's environment. 13. Promote coordination among Florida's ports to increase their utilization. 14. Encourage the full utilization by businesses of the economic development enhancement programs implemented by the Legislature for the purpose of extensively involving private businesses in the development and expansion of permanent job opportunities, especially for the economically disadvantaged, through the utilization of enterprise zones, community development corporations, and other programs designed to enhance economic and employment opportunities. (23) AGRICULTURE.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall maintain and strive to expand its food, agriculture, ornamental horticulture, aquaculture, forestry, and related industries in order to be a healthy and competitive force in the national and international marketplace. (b) Policies. -- 1. Ensure that goals and policies contained in state and regional plans are not interpreted to permanently restrict the conversion of agricultural lands to other uses. 2. Encourage diversification within the agriculture industry, especially to reduce the vulnerability of communities that are largely reliant upon agriculture for either income or employment. 3. Promote and increase international agricultural marketing opportunities for all Florida agricultural producers. 4. Stimulate research, development, and application of agricultural technology to promote and enhance the conservation, production, and marketing techniques available to the agriculture industry. 5. Encourage conservation, wastewater recycling, and other appropriate measures to assure adequate water resources to meet agricultural and other beneficial needs. 6. Promote entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector by providing technical and informational services. 7. Stimulate continued productivity through investment in education and research. http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 21 of 23 8. Encourage development of biological pest controls to further the reduction in reliance on chemical controls. 9. Conserve soil resources to maintain the economic value of land for agricultural pursuits and to prevent sedimentation in state waters. 10. Promote the vitality of Florida's agricultural industry through continued funding of basic research, extension, inspection, and analysis services and of programs providing for marketing and technical assistance and the control and eradication of diseases and infestations. 11. Continue to promote the use of lands for agricultural purposes by maintaining preferential property tax treatment through the greenbelt law. 12. Ensure that coordinated state planning of road, rail, and waterborne transportation systems provides adequate facilities for the economical transport of agricultural products and supplies between producing areas and markets. 13. Eliminate the discharge of inadequately treated wastewater and stormwater runoff into waters of the state. (24) TOURISM.-- (a) Goal.--Florida will attract at least 55 million tourists annually by 1995 and shall support efforts by all areas of the state wishing to develop or expand tourist-related economies. (b) Policies.-- 1. Promote statewide tourism and support promotional efforts in those parts of the state that desire to attract visitors. 2. Acquire and manage public lands to offer visitors and residents increased outdoor experiences. 3. Promote awareness of historic places and cultural and historical activities. (25) EMPLOYMENT.-- (a) GoaL--Florida shall promote economic opportunities for its unemployed and economically disadvantaged residents. (b) Policies.-- 1. Achieve by 1995 a 70-percent job placement rate for state training program graduates and a 50-percent reduction in the gap between the unemployment rate for disadvantaged groups and the average state unemployment rate. 2. Provide training opportunities for the unemployed which are based upon documented labor market needs. 3. Provide training and job placement assistance to hard-to-employ groups encountering special barriers. 4. Encourage economic development in economically distressed areas. 5. Ensure that the transportation system provides maximum access to jobs and markets. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 22 of 23 6. Promote interagency coordination and cooperation to maximize the impact of employment and training services on target groups. 7. Provide services which assist students to make informed career decisions. 8. Encourage innovative arrangements such as onsite day care facilities and flexible hours of employment to increase the access of working parents to the job market. 9. Ensure that all training programs focus on providing each student with lifetime employment skills, including the ability to communicate, compute, and think critically. (26) PLAN IMPLEMENTATION.-- (a) Goal.--Systematic planning capabilities shall be integrated into all levels of government in Florida with particular emphasis on improving intergovernmental coordination and maximizing citizen involvement. (b) Policies.-- 1. Establish strong and flexible agency and regional planning functions at all levels of government capable of responding to changing state policies and goals. 2. Ensure that every level of government has the appropriate operational authority to implement the policy directives established in the plan. 3. Establish effective monitoring, incentive, and enforcement capabilities to see that the requirements established by regulatory programs are met. 4. Simplify, streamline, and make more predictable the existing permitting procedures. 5. Ensure that each agency's functional plan and management process is designed to achieve the policies and goals of the state plan consistent with state law. 6. Encourage citizen participation at all levels of policy development, planning, and operations. 7. Ensure the development of strategic regional policy plans and local plans that implement and accurately reflect state goals and policies and that address problems, issues, and conditions that are of particular concern in a region. 8. Encourage the continual cooperation among communities which have a unique natural area, irrespective of political boundaries, to bring the private and public sectors together for establishing an orderly, environmentally, and economically sound plan for future needs and growth. History,.--s. 2, ch. 85-57; s. 1, ch. 87-354; s. 47, ch. 88-130; s. 4, ch. 89-279; s. 85, ch. 90- 201; s. 28, ch. 91-5; s. 103, ch. 91-282; s. 2, ch. 95-149; s. 2, ch. 96-388; s. 6, ch. 99-378. iNote.--The term "career education" was substituted for the term "vocational education" by the editors pursuant to the directive of the Legislature in s. 16, ch. 94-232. 2Note.--The term "degree career education" was substituted for the term "postsecondary vocational" by the editors pursuant to the directive of the Legislature in s. 16, ch. 94-232. Welcome • Session • Committees • Legislators • Information Center • Statutes and Constitution • Lobbyist Information http://www.leg. state.fl.us/Statut.../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 statutes->View Statutes->2000->Ch0187->Section 201: Online Sunshine Page 23 of 23 Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright © 2000 State of Florida. Contact us. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statut .../SEC201.HTM&Title=->2000->Ch0187->Section%2020 12/01/2000 N 0 150 300 DREW STREET PARCEL 3 MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) EXISTING ACCESS 0 0 rn ? w vi CD Q DZ OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82.179 SF UNDER CONSTRUCTION) OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EXISTING) NATURAL AREA 0 PARCEL 2 OJv m MULTI-FAMILY 156 D.U. G? P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Qv 2P PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120.560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) CIFEI-CE 220,560 SF COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55.278 SF EXIST ON / PARCELS 7 AND 9) PARCEL 10 (11.70} SF ExISTWC) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14.539 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25.842 SF EXISTING) LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU , 390 DU N41S5 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON REST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003, 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1.000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 85722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE UNITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100.000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS "IN A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. a ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAU-S. SURVEYORS B PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT'B' TO PARK PLACE DRI NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 EXISTING ACCESS 0 O vt? z 0 a E FUTURE ACCESS P?ce vp--A P LORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. GINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 6 PLANNERS November 22, 2000 Mr. Kent Fast, AICP, DRI Coordinator Florida Department of Transportation Planning Department 11201 N. McKinley Drive Re: Park Place DRI = NOPC (DRI #92) Response to Comments Dear Mr. Fast: We received your letter to Mr. Gary Jones dated November 8, 2000 and note that you recognize the reduction in intensity and trip generation. As we discussed earlier this week, the project driveways to Hampton Road will be "STOP" controlled and were properly analyzed as unsignalized intersections. The signalized intersection at SR 60/Hampton Road which presently operates at LOS "A" is not significantly impacted by this project as project traffic comprises only 2.98% of the intersection capacity, therefore it was not analyzed for future conditions. I trust this letter satisfies your inquiry and I would appreciate a short letter to me indicating your approval. Sincerely, Robert C. Pergo rzzi Vice President Transportation & Planning :dc L:\fast.doc cc: -Gary Jones Nicholas Shackleton Tim Johnson File 172-07.590 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8606 ??i Mar 05 04 02:46p Carolina Santos 305-860-6935 p.l HTG COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. 3225 Aviation Avenue - PH Suite - Coconut Grove, FL 33133 - Tel: 305.860.8188 - Fax 305.860.8196 - www.HousingTrustGroup.com March 5, 2004 Ms. Gina L. Clayton City of Clearwater Planning Department PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Clayton: Is V/ . MAR 0 8 2004 DEVELOPMENT ? ? f i v IDES DEPT CITY Or MATER I referred to your letter of Feb. 26th to Tim regarding the Annual Report on the Park Place DRI. That DRI was in the process of being extended during the fall and that extension is now being completed. Apparently the report was overlooked as the focus was on the renewal but I understand that Bausch & Lomb has already instructed engineers to finalize the report and forward it to you as soon as possible. They and we apologize for the oversight and again reconfirm that this report is being submitted as a matter of urgency. Yours Nick SlAackleton President HTG Commercial Group, Inc. ptif ?i cc: Maura Minges, B&L Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns Stewart Marcus, HTG ® A HOUSING TRUST GROUP COMPANY oYk Play Mar 05 04 02:4Gp Carolina Santos 305-860-6935 - -----..---- LANG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW p. 2 CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLoRIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 Fvc (727) 562-4576 February 26, 2004 - - •? ...' Mr. Tim Johnson, Esquire 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Dear Mr. Jo son: The City and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council have not received the annual report for the Park Place Development of Regional Impact I (DRI #92). This report was due on September 1, 2003. Please submit the report within 30 days. If you need any additional information, please contact me at 562-4587. Sincerely yours, Gina L. Clayton Long Range Planning Manager Cc: John Meyer, TBRPC MAR 0 8 2004 DEVELQPPM,' c' VICES DER _ CITY OF (:I ? ,4?A/nrcn BRI,W J. AUNGST, MAYOR-CoMMis.simmi HoYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONRR WHrrNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, CONI.NIISSIONI.R ® BiLLJONSON, COMMISSIONER ^FntiA7 FAda,(IVAdF\I' ANn AFFIR6+ nw, A('rim, Vmpioyrp- Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH GOVERNOR November 8, 2000 Mr. Gary L. Jones, AICP Senior Planner City-of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRI#92) Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Jones: THOMAS E BARRY, JR. SECRETARY We reviewed the Notice of proposed Change application for the Park Place DRI in Clearwater. Please find below our comments related to this proposed change. • There does appear to be a reduction in land use intensities which would result in a lower PM peak hour traffic impact to nearby roadways. • The increased utilization of a land use mix could well cause some increase in internal capture, which would also reduce the impact on nearby roadways. • The land use exchange rates offered with the application seem consistent with the respective land use trip generation rates offered in ITE. • Our only traffic question has to do with Hampton Road near the subject property. Both site driveways (near Parcel 6) which intersect with Hampton Road were analyzed as stop controlled intersections, as appropriate. However, the Hampton Road signalized intersection at SR 60 was not included in the analysis. Why? • The City may want to restrict the left turns on south bound Hampton Road at the SR 60 intersection if there is a safety concern. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Kent Fast, AICP DRI Coordinator www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER Mr. Gary L Jones, AICP November 8, 2000 Page 2 cc: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Florida Design Consultants, Inc. George Deakin, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. John Meyer, Tampa Bay RPC Marina Pennington, Dept. of Community Affairs Al Navaroh, Pinellas County Tim Johnson, Johnson,Blakely,Pope,Bokor,Ruppel & Burns, P.A. F: \p1730kf\dri_revi\dri00 \o01108.92.doc Tampa 8ay,7Z.eg/onal Planning Council Chairman Commissioner Chris Hart November 9, 2000 vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Frederick T Reeves Mayor Pat Whitesel Manny L. Pumariega Mr. Timothy A, Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Blakely et al 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Johnson: The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has reviewed the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) submitted for the Park Place Development of Regional Impact. On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. The Development Order currently expires on September 1, 2003. The currently approved phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT - 3 OFFICE i4NDUSTRIAL ?_ ' RETAIL WTVI RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT = '+ (Sg Ft.) ' (Sq'Ft.) (Sq Ft.) (Multi, Famii Uriits} Y _.a- . ., .a.?.?. Dec. 31, 2000 635,680 200,000 150,000 390 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 http://vv,\&w.tbrpc.org The NOPC Application, which was received on October 11, 2000, requested the following modifications to the Development Order: • Extend project buildout by three years (to December 31, 2003). This represent a cumulative extension of 12 years; • reduce authorized office space by 234,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,800 sq. ft.(to 81,120 sq. ft.); • provide a land use equivalency factor for Parcel #6 to potentially convert office use to multi- family residential or hotel use; and • revise the Development Plan ("Map H") accordingly. A revised transportation analysis was included within the NOPC submittal to address these changes, as required by Chapter 380.06, F.S. These proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes. Several issues, noted below, need to be clarified before it can be determined if sufficient information has been supplied to rebut the presumption. Intersection Analyses, Truck Factor. The applicant has used a truck factor of two percent in the intersection analyses. The two percent is acceptable for the current NOPC, but in any future NOPC analysis it is requested that the actual truck factor, as determined from actual FDOT, Pinellas County or applicant counts, should be used. 2. DRI Project Traffic as a percent of Intersection Capacity. It appears that the applicant needs to update the calculation of the percentage of project traffic to the intersection capacity for the signalized intersections. The numerator should be the sum of the DRI project traffic in the HCS critical movements, divided by the Peak Hour Factor (PHF) for each critical movement; and the denominator is the sum of the capacities of the critical movements multiplied by a factor of 0.885 to derive the capacity at level of service D. Examples of the methodology can be supplied upon request. 3. Project Trip Distribution. What was the basis of the project trip distribution? If it was based on a FSUTMS analysis, please state when the FSUTMS analysis was conducted and supply the review agency with a copy of the FSUTMS files. Typically a FSUTMS analysis would show a midblock dissipation of project trips on Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard west of U.S. 19, however this is not the case for the project trip distribution shown in Figure 2, (unnumbered, three pages after page number 4). 4. Project Transportation Impact Mitigation. Please specifically identify the transportation improvements required by the Development Order, provide updated status of each improvement, identify developer's proportionate share calculation and identify the proportionate share payments made to date. I have attached copies of comments received from the Florida Department of Transportation regarding your proposal which should also be addressed. No additional comments have been received from any of the other review parties identified below. If correspondences are received from these agencies in the near future and you are not already copied, I will immediately forward a copy to your attention. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me (ext. 255). Thank you. ely, er Si4D5inator JMM cc: Nick Shackleton, PPLL Kent Fast, FDOT Robert Pergolizzi, FDC Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Marina Pennington, FDCA George Deakin, Kimley-Horn LGary Jones; City of Clearwater i?TVN' Florida Department of Transportation JF.B RUSH (;oV LR:N()R November 8, 2000 Mr. Gary L. Jones, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, rlorida 33756 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRY#92) Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Jones: THOMAS F. HARRY. JR. SFr.RF.T:%RV We reviewed the Notice of proposed Change application for the Park Place DRI in Clearwater. Please find below our comments related to this proposed change. • There does appear to be a reduction in land use intensities which would result in a lower PM peak hour traffic impact to nearby roadways. The increased utilization of a land use mix could well cause some increase in internal capture, which would also reduce the impact on nearby roadways. • The land use exchange rates offered with the application seem consistent with the respective land use trip generation rates offered in iTE. • Our only traffic question has to do with Hampton Road near the subject property. Both site driveways (near Parcel 6) which intersect with Hampton Road were analyzed as stop controlled intersections, as appropriate. However, the Hampton Road signalized intersection at SR 60 was not included in the analysis. Why? The City may want to restrict the left turns on south bound Hampton Road at the SR 60 intersection if there is a safety concern. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Ke t Fast, AICP DRI Coordinator www.dot.state.fLus V RECYCLED ^Af ER ZO'd £V179 SL6 £T8 6uLuuQLd L '-ISLO 100A d0£=£0 00-eo-^av C` Mr. Gary L Jones, AICP November 8, 2000 Page 2 cc: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Florida Design Consultants, Inc. George Deakin, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. John Meyer, Tampa Bay RPC Marina Pennington, Dept. of Community Affairs "Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Tim Johnson, Johnson,Blakely,Pope,Bokor,Ruppel tip Burns, P_A. R \pI73OkjAdri-Mvi\dri00\001108.92.doc F £O'd £Vb9 SLG £i8 6uLuuQLd L 4S-LO 100 d0£=£O 00-80-AON ?. o* NaQ cnw ? c1 IL + MlAr, i. DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,103,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 150,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. Since the project has been previously consolidated into a single phase, this represents a cumulative buildout extension of 18 years. This inference to 1985 marks the initial Phase I buildout date. The currentl -a roved phasing schedule is as follows: PROJECT. OFFICE INDUSTRIAL'. RETAIL RESIDENTIAL: BUILDOUT (Sq: Ft.) ` (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.). (Multi-Family. Units) . , 2000 635,680 200,000 150,000 390 The developer requests the following changes to the Development Order: reduction of office space by 231,041 sq. ft. (to 404,639 sq. ft.) and retail space by 68,880 sq. ft. (to 81,120 sq. ft.); allow conversion of Parcel #6 to hotel or multi-family uses; and further extend the project buildout date by an additional three years (to December 31, 2003). The reduction in development parameters does not constitute a Substantial Deviation. The additional extension requested does constitute a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: "An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact. An extension of the date of buildout, or any phase thereof, of 5 years or more but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a Tampa SayXegional Planning Council • N (--]ill P C Consent Agenda 01/08/01 Agenda Item #2.C.1 Notice of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org i substantial deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. An extension of less than 5 years is not a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a buildout, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or judicial • proceedings relating to development permits. Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time." As identified above, the aforementioned modifications are presumed to constitute a Substantial Deviation to the Development Order. However, the applicant has rebutted this presumption upon the submittal of a sufficient transportation analysis. Therefore, no unmitigated regional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed modifications. Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that applicant has rebutted the presumption of a substantial deviation to the Development Order. F1 I-C - fa(? Place, I JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE W. BARNES JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ROBERT M. DAISLEY ELIZABETH J. DANIELS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR- SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.- MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT A.R. "CHAR LIE" NEAL F. WALL ACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. DONALD P. REED DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL• CHARLES A. SAMARKOS CLAY C. SCHUETT PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER AMBER F. WILLIAMS JULIUS J. ZSCHAU 'OF COUNSEL FILE No. 37413.95209 April 4, 2000 Pamela Akin, City Attorney City of Clearwater Post Office Box,4308 Clearwater, FL 33756-1368 Re: Park Place Development Order Dear Pam: You and I have discussed recently the issue of the fact that the build-out year for the Park Place DRI ends December 31, 2000 wherein the Development Order in fact is operative through December 8, 2003. My client, Clinton International Group, Inc., has submitted plans to the City for construction of an office building and he anticipates he will receive permits to commence construction in a short period of time. Assuming no delay in obtaining permits, my client anticipates that he will have a certificate of occupancy for the construction of the last building under the Development Order on or about March of 2001. This creates a situation where the "build out" date expires before the completion of the building. Tim Johnson did the initial research on the criteria of the term "build-out" and I was fortunate enough to have had an opportunity to talk to Tim today and asked him about his research. In fact, he advises that there is no definition of the "build out" in any of the Florida Statutes or its regulations. The definition has been left to the interpretation of various agencies. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-1368 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365 TAMPA OFFICE 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602-5145 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER (727)462-0365 NAPLES OFFICE 975 SIXTH AVE. S POST OFFICE BOX 1368 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (941) 435-0035 TELECOPIER: (941) 435-9992 I ?l JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Pamela Akin April 4, 2000 Page 2 To assist you in that interpretation, I would direct to the Development Order, Section 5, Paragraph E at page 25 wherein it provides: "...Any development activity wherein plans have been submitted to the City for its review and approval prior to the expiration date of this order may be completed, if approved...." Further it provides that "...this order may be extended by the City upon finding of just cause." It would seem that if the order date can be extended that it would be inconsistent to not also construe that the build out date could likewise be extended under the same circumstances. If the City were to extend the build out date, or in the alternative to allow my client to complete the project he commenced before the expiration of he build out date would not be inconsistent with the Development Order and would not be contrary to any statute or regulation that has been formerly interpreted by any state agency. I respectfully request that you consider an interpretation that would allow my client to complete the building that he had commenced prior to the termination of the build out date. If that were to be your decision then it would be very helpful to my client, his lenders and tenant if you could provide correspondence on City letterhead of that interpretation. Thank you for your kind cooperation. Yours very truly, Roger A. Larson "y in H.Wbap, #210655 v1 - Clinton Intemational/rmp Chairman Barbara Romano June 23, 1999 Tampa Bav X eglonal Plann/ng Councll 74A_c_ 4; Vice-Chairman Secretary/Measurer Executive Direct5r Commissioner Chris Han Frederick T. eeves Manny L. Pumariega Mr. Kevin Smith Storz Ophthalmics 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, Florida 33759 Subject: DRI #92 - Dear Mr. Smith: F D JUN 2 519% PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Metropoint, City of Clearwater Anniversary Month - September Chapter 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, (F.S.), requires the developer of an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) to submit an annual report to the local government, the regional planning agency, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and to all affected permit agencies (planning or administrative divisions) on the date specified in the Development Order. Our records indicate that the anniversary month for your annual report is September. Please check your Development Order, as it may include information requirements in addition to those required by the DCA (see enclosed annual report format). The annual report should also identify activities completed for the reporting year and activities proposed for the coming year. Pursuant to Chapter 9J-2.0252, Florida Administrative Code, the DCA DRI Review Fee Rule (enclosed - see (6)), please submit a check for $250.00 made payable to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, along with the annual report. The check must include the DRI name and number for identification purposes. It is noted that Subsection 380.06(18), F.S., indicates that if the local government does not receive the annual report or receives notification that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the developer submit the report within 30 days. The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government. 9455 Koger Boulevard. Suite 219. St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 577.5151 FAX(727)570-5118 Suncom 586-3217 http://www.tbrpc.org (lawl / e44-? Tampa Sav egional Planning Council Cbair Vice-Cfjair Robert A. "Bob" Rersteen Jiff Coffins June 26, 2006 Ms. Maura R. Minges Bausch & Lomb Incorporated One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Mr. Nick Shackleton Carmel Commercial Group, Inc. Continental Plaza 3250 Mary Street, 5 h Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Subject: DR[ #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater Anniversary Month - September Dear Ms. Minges and Mr. Shackleton: RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Chapter 3 80.06(18), Florida Statutes, (F. S.), requires the developer of an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) to submit an annual report to the local government, the regional planning agency, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and any additional identified agency(ies) on the date specified in the Development Order. Our records indicate that the anniversary month for your annual report is September. Please check your Development Order, as it may include information requirements in addition to those required by the DCA (see enclosed annual report format). The annual report should also identify activities completed for the reporting year and activities proposed for the coming year. Pursuant to Chapter 9J-2.0252, Florida Administrative Code, the DCA DRI Review Fee Rule (enclosed - see (6)), please submit a check for $250.00 made payable to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, along with the annual report. The check must include the DRI name and number for identification purposes. It is noted that Subsection 380.06(18), F.S., indicates that if the local government does not receive the annual report or receives notification that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the developer submit the report within 30 days. The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government. SecretarNITreasurer Executive Director Commissioner Scott Bfacft MannN Pumarie9a 40oo GatewaN Centre Boufevard, Suite i oo • Pinellas Park FL 33782 PWne: 727-570-5151 • Fax: 727-570-5118 • State Number: 513-5o66 • wwwtbrpc.org Tampa Bay R eglonal Planning Council 4000 Gatewap Centre Blvd., suite too Pinellas Park, FL 337$2 Y, n 044J83048526 10 c $0.3991 N D 06/27/2006 -?? 4112!=d 4+a!!=d Fro 33782 Mr. Michael Delk, Director City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 SVjIrj' Iti?ilnrl.1eflia4sl??tt??i?11?9?Iyae??itlifliltilitil??il{?li?t Please feel free to contact me if you have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, o M. Meyer Coordinator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: Mr Michael Delk Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP "-6:4 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST' OFFICE Box 4745, CLE4RIC'ATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIF AVENUE, CIF_ARU:.ATFR, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 August 23, 1999 Mr. Roger Larson, Esq. Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. Post Office Box 1368 Clearwater, Florida 33756-1368 FIL" RE: Park Place Development of Regional Impact Dear Mr. Larson: I have reviewed your letter dated August 11, 1999 with regard to the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The City concurs based on the Ordinances(3205-83 and as amended by 3287-83) and the current Community Development Code on the following: 1. A .30 Floor Area Ratio for low rise office (3 stories or less) and .40 Floor Area Ratio for mid-rise office (4 to 8 stories) is permitted. 2. Maximum office space has been reduced through amendments to the Ordinances to 795,520 square feet. 3. Maximum permitted height is 80 feet in the Commercially zoned portion of the DRI which includes Parcel 8 based on regulations in effect at the time the Development Order was executed. The developer is vested and would not need to enter the process of seeking a height increase beyond current requirements, and has the right to develop according to the original and amended Development Order under the Park Place DRI. Please contact me at 562-4547 if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, *A, ?Y"- I ? ? -* Cyndi Hardin, AICP Assistant Planning Director ONE CITY. ONE FUTURE. BRIAN J. ACNGST, \L-xYOR-CO\1NflSS1ONER ED HOOPFR, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER BOB CIARK, COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER ® J.B. JOHNSON, JR., COMMISSIONER "EQu.AL Empi-o IEN-r AND AFFIR.\LmvF ACTION E\1PLO1ER" 1? Please feel free to contact me if you have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, M. Meory ator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: ,Mr"Ralph Stone Ms. Marina Pennington j lodi 6jaa??,- ??Ak LAND USE DATA LAW USE ACRES DEIISITY OFFICE / RETAL 10.6 10%= of 27 8 r '--- , om?a rARE 113 Amen . WADPoBE OFFICE / RETAIL 660,000 d PARK 0"162 l; 110.000 d / MIDRISE OFFICE 6.1 210AW d __-- ' fat ACA n OFFICE PARK 96.6 660AW of = '-- ---- PARKS 6.0 ' '-,? --_ --- ROAD R.O.W. 0.6 QPS?OCorulc TOTAL 66 1 f 1 660A00 . o , ---------- NOTE TRACT DESIGNATIONS ARE SHOWN POR CONYEMENCE ZI?,000 d ONLY. ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT MAY PROCEED N ANY ORDER. \\ / Mjk'!N OMM 'V RETAIL ?01 ice: ' \9A ACM16 / r 101 Acws OP" / RE36a m A0p ?? II T of = 0 W ' I l i l I I ? ? ,/ / 100. d 0111 to Say ' SNd. 9A 0 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Puh phx?(;= Metro Development Corporation ES / i d. / of ?? 0 =ft Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 12 JULY 1"9 im. Maeo a MAP H K 0 li?l ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Environmental Engineering Planning & Landscape Architecture Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping Construction Management September 29, 1999 D 0 T_ IE OCT 0 1 1999 KM Hfl & DEVELOPMENT SVCS John Asmar City of Clearwater Central Permitting Department / ?PI-2 P.O. Box 4748 l? Clearwater, FL 33758 A Re: Park Place DRI Annual Report Dear Mr. Asmar: In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 380.06(18), F.S., and the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order for the Park Place DRI, enclosed are three (3) copies of the Annual Report for the year ending September 1, 1999 and any applicable review fees. A copy of this report is being concurrently submitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs and Southwest Florida Water Management District. Sincere Robert A. Rutledge, AICP Transportation Project Manager Encl. cc: Kevin Smith, Bausch & Lomb Surgical John Meyers, DR[ Coordinator, TBRPC, w/encl. 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center J. Thomas Beck, Chief, Bureau of State Planning, DCA, w/encl. Mark Phelps, SWFWMD, w/encl. Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 Jon Gottwald, King Engineering, w/encl. File: 1255-010-000 813 • 880 • 8 G? 8 82 E-Mail king@kingeng.com yj?ec wzl6?k moo- ?14?- JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL 8L BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE W. BARNES JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ROBERT M. DAISLEY ELIZABETH J. DANIELS MARION HALE JAMES W. HUMANN SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. AMANDA C. KAISER SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.* MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. DONALD P. REED DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS JOHN A. SCHAEFER PHILIP M. SHASTEEN CLAY C. SCHUETT PIERCY J. STAKELUM IV JOAN M. VECCHIOLI AMBER F. WILLIAMS JULIUS J. ZSCHAU *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE No. 37413.95209 August 11, 1999 Ms. Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Park Place Development of Regional Impact Dear Cyndi: y F F l AUG Z PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER In furtherance of our telephone conversation on Tuesday, August 10, 1999, 1 thought I would pose the direct question to the City with respect to the height allowance for the balance of the office buildings at Park Place. The new City Code combined a number of commercial categories in to a category called Commercial District "C". Under the new code regulation the maximum height permitted is 25 feet. Through the section involving a flex to that restriction the height could be increased to as much as 50 feet. In our original Development Order in Ordinance 3205-83 as amended by Ordinance 3287-83 the Developer was granted a floor area ratio of .25 for retail commercial, a floor area ratio of .30 for low rise office and a floor area ratio of .40 from mid-rise office. In that same Ordinance the mid-rise office was defined as 4-8 stories. The issue is whether or not the amendment of the City's Code restricts the Developer to 25 feet and therefore requiring a Community Development Board Review to exceed that height limitation of 25 feet. In my judgment, based on the Ordinances and the new Code my client would not be required to seek an approval from the Community Development Board to exceed 25 feet. I base that on the following: CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE NAPLES OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET 975 SIXTH AVE. S POST OFFICE BOX 1368 SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-1368 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602-5145 TELEPHONE: (941) 435-0035 TELECOPIER (727) 441-8617 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (941) 435-9992 BANKRUPTCY TELECOPIER (727) 443-6548 TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Ms. Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater August 11, 1999 Page 2 1. The original Development Order granted a .40 floor ratio for mid-rise office (mid-rise office being defined as 4 through 8 stories). 2. Maximum office space originally granted was 1,103,000 square feet which through amendments to the Ordinances has been reduced to 795,520 square feet. 3. Assuming my client would not exceed a maximum use of floor area and floor area ratio for low rise of .30 and for mid-rise of .40 in consuming the 795,520 square feet my client would be within the Development Order requirements and limitations. 4. TheDevelopment Code at section 1-106 provides that any Ordinances of the City previously granting rights with respect to variances or approvals that were in existence prior to the Code would remain in effect and would not be affected by the Code. 5. In Section 4, paragraph E the original Development Order provided in part: "all development pursuant to the Order shall be consistent with applicable land development and building regulations, codes, ordinances, and policies in effect at the time of the application for final site plan approval for the respective components of the project. No amendment of any said regulation, code or ordinance or policy adopted subsequent to the effective date of this Order, however, shall preclude or require any material revision of the type of use or the amount of floor area as set forth in the conceptual plan. 6. Refer to Section 7 in the original Order wherein it provides in part: "acceptance (of funding from developer) shall not preclude the City from amending its land development or building regulations applicable to the Projects so long as said amendments are not administered in a manner inconsistent with this Development Order. 7. Refer to Section 8 of the original Development Order wherein it provides in part: "all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conflict repealed. JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Ms. Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater August 11, 1999 Page 3 believe taken together all of this would suggest that the Developer need not enter into a process of seeking a height increase beyond the 25 feet permitted by District "C" and that the Developer right to construct eight stories as permitted in the original Development Order under the Development of Regional Impact has vested. 1 would appreciate your reviewing my comments and either confirming or disagreeing with my conclusion. If you disagree then I would ask that you provide me with those specific sections that would be contrary to this conclusion. As you are perhaps aware my client has considered filing for a Notice of Proposed Change desiring to extend the build out term an additional period of time. Your response to the question posed in this correspondence is directly related to our business decision as to whether or not to proceed with the NOPC prior to resolving this issue. look forward to your response. Yours ve truly, Roger A. Larson RAL/ar cc: Mr. Nick Shackleton 193075 Tampa Say.R.eglonal Planning Councll Chairman Barbara Romano August 13, 1999 Vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Chris Hart Frederick T. Reeves Manny L. Pumariega Mr. Kevin Smith Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, Florida 33759 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Annual Report Summary, RY 1997-98, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Smith: The above-referenced item will be considered at the August 23, 1999 meeting of the Clearinghouse Review Committee which will be held at the Council offices at 9:30 a.m. A copy of this report and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative plan to attend. To staff s knowledge, no change in local government jurisdiction has occurred, no undeveloped land has been sold, no properties have been purchased or optioned adjacent to the original DRI and no changes in the plan of development or phasing have been made during the reporting period, unless specified in the annual report summary. A list of permits obtained, applied for or denied during the reporting period and confirmation of the required distribution of the annual report have been provided in the report, unless otherwise noted. Please refer to the last paragraph of the annual report summary for an assessment of consistency with the Development Order and for any additional information or clarifications needed. If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 577-5151, ext. 255. Sincerely, yer DRI Coordinator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: -Mr._Zlph.Stone= RDD ECEYEB AUG 71999 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702.2491 Phone (727) 577-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 Suncom 586-3217 http://www.tbrpc.org ? __ _ _ _ _ I, ??-??, ? ??ia?? ??y. 1. _'?.''t "' Tampa Say regional Planning Council ARS Agenda Item #2.A.4. CRC - 8/23/99 Annual Report Summary 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER RY 1997-98 On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended three times, with the latest occurring on November 21, 1996 (Ordinance No. 6107-96). The amendments have cumulatively: revised the approved development parameters; authorized multi-family (Ordinance 5722-95) and hotel (Ordinance No. 6107-96) land uses (via an equivalency matrix); consolidated the entire project into a single phase; and extended the project buildout. The Development Order expires on September 1, 2003. The anniversary date for the Annual Report is September 1". Through the amendment process, the project has been downscaled to the following: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) 'INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL (Multi-Family Units) 2000 795,520* 200,000* 150,000* 510 * - Development parameters are subject to change upon the developer exercising option to construct multi-family units or hotel rooms. Development this Reporting Year: The developer completed construction of a 9,005 sq. ft. Joe's Crab Shack, 390 multi-family residential units within The Grand Reserve and the Park Place Boulevard road improvement. The developer received construction plan approval for two additional office buildings during the reporting year. Cumulative Development: the developer has completed 120,560 sq. ft. of office space, 100,000 sq. ft. of light industrial space, 82,020 sq. ft. of retail space and 390 multi-family residential units. Projected Development: The developer anticipates commencement of development on two office parcels during the next reporting year. 1. The developer has identified continued compliance with Mass Transit requirements (Condition 4.CC.); stormwater runoff disposal (Condition 4.L.); and funding of transportation improvements (Conditions 4.E., 4.G. and 4.Z.). 2. Condition 4.EE. requires the developer to provide the City with a ten-foot easement for pedestrian ingress/egress prior to the issuance of any permits for Parcel 4. The developer has stated that with the construction of the sidewalk completed, such dedication must have been provided. The developer has verified that the Park Place Boulevard road improvement, illustrated as Parcel "A" ("Exhibit B"/Ordinance 5722-95), has been completed in accordance with Condition 4.N.2. 4. The developer completed a capture-release program on December 6, 1991, consistent with Condition 4.T. The developer has additionally obtained an "Osprey Nest Relocation" permit from the Florida Game &. Freshwater Fish Commission in 1996, consistent with Condition 4.S. The project appears to be in compliance with all other conditions at this time. A revised listing of the DRI property owners (by parcel) is attached. and provided as Table 1. These property owners are responsible for fulfilling the obligations of the DRI. Bausch & Lomb Optical, 21 Park Place Boulevard North, Clearwater, FL 34606 prepared and submitted the annual report. The project appears to be proceeding in a manner consistent with the Development Order. The City of Clearwater is responsible for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Order. TABLE 1 PAR- MAX. FLOOR AREA CEL PARCEL NUMBER (Sq. Ft.) PROPERTY OWNER 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010, 200,000 - Indust. Bausch & Lomb Optical, 21 Park Place Blvd. N., Clearwater, FL 34619 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020, 156 MF Res. Units The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P., 1101 N. Lake Destiny 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 234 MF Res, Units Dr., Suite 400, Maitland, FL 32751 4 17-29 16 00000 230 0130 000 Retail2 60 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche, Attention: Mary , Bonnell, 200 E. Las Olas Blvd., #400, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 120,560 - Office Park Place Building Ltd., Attention: Arlene, 420 Park Place Blvd., 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 120,000 - Office Clearwater, FL 33579 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 60,000 - Retail 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 124 860 - Office Garcia Enterprises Tampa Inc., 15950 Bay Vista Dr., Suite 250, , Clearwater, FL 33760 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 5,000 - Retail Alex-Arl Florida Company, 901 Venetian Bay Blvd., Venice, FL 34292 Other than: 10,000 sq. 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010, ft. (all Lot 10) and 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020, 15,000 sq. ft. (all Lot 11C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030, 11) of retail space, Clant Inc., Post Office Box 916464, Longwood, FL 32791-6464 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040, further information is 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 not available for subdivided parcels. NOTES: 1. Utilizing adopted Land Use Equivalency Matrix, the Developer has obtained approval to simultaneously reduce approved office space in exchange for 156 and 234 multi-family units respectively for Lots 2 & 3. (Ordinance No. 5722-95) 2. Ordinance No. 6107-96 granted approval for the construction of a hotel component of development (to a maximum of 224 rooms) for Lot 4 with a simultaneous reduction of office or retail. Tampa 8av X egional Planning Council Agenda CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW COMMITTEE 9:30 a.m. August 23, 1999 The Committee, in accordance with its adopted rules of procedure, may take action only on matters on the printed agenda. It may exercise agency discretion and policy-making upon a finding by the Committee of an emergency situation affecting the public's health, safety, and welfare. Committee meetings are public meetings within the context of Section 286.011, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Committee meetings are not public hearings within the context of Section 120.54, F.S. The Chairman has full discretion as to whether or not to recognize speakers other than Committee members or staff, and is not required to recognize individuals to speak on issues before the Committee. Public hearings on issues before the Committee are conducted by individual local governments and are the proper forum for public comment. Please note that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Committee with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person must ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. *** THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC *** 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 577-5151 Suncom 586-3217 FAX (727) 570-5118 http://www.tbrpc.org If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this meeting, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at (727) 577-5151, x 217 within three working days of the meeting. t. ROLL CALL Agenda Item #1 Agenda Item #2 MINUTES Additional Material: Action Recommended: Minutes of June 28, 1999. Motion to approve. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are either informational or non-controversial in nature and are recommended by staff for approval. Discussion of any individual item may be accomplished by any Committee member requesting that the item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Requests to remove items from the Consent Agenda must be made prior to the motion to pass the Consent Agenda. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be discussed, in order of appearance, as Agenda Item #3, immediately following passage of the Consent Agenda. A. DRI ANNUAL REPORTS CONSISTENT WITH THEIR DEVELOPMENT ORDERS Pursuant to Section 380.06, F.S., DRIs approved since August 1, 1980 are required to submit an annual `progress report describing development activities of the previous year and proposed activities for the upcoming year. 1. DRI #74 River Ridge, Pasco County, RYs 1996-98 2. DRI #76 Cargill Gypsum Disposal Site, Hillsborough County, RY 1997-98 3. DRI #89 Brandon Town Center, Hillsborough County, RY 1997-98 4. DRI #92 Park Place, City of Clearwater, RY 1997-98 5. DRI #94 TampaSphere, City of Tampa, RY 1997-98 6. DRI #103 Cooper Creek, Manatee County, RY 1997-98 7. DRI #108 Hidden River Corporate Park, City of Tampa, RYs 1996-98 8. DRI #110 Rocky Point Office & Commercial Park, City of Tampa, RYs 1996-98 9. DRI #132 Gateway Centre Business Park, Cities of St. Petersburg & Pinellas Park, RY 1997-98 10. DRI #140 Tampa Triangle, Hillsborough County, RY 1997-98 11. DRI #157 Trinity Communities, Pasco & Pinellas Counties, RY 1997-98 12. DRI #180 University Business Center, City of Tampa, RY 1997-98 13. DRI #194 DG Farms, Hillsborough County, RYs 1996-98 14. DRI #215 Gulfview Square Mall, Pasco County, RY 1997-98 Addi tional Material: Respective Annual Reports. B. DRI PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT LETTERS NONE 2 ST C. DRI NOTICES OF PROPOSED CHANGE - CONSISTENT The following projects have proposed changes to their respective Development Orders. Following evaluation of these changes for unmitigated potential regional impacts and consistency with statutory requirements, Council staff has concluded that these modifications would not represent a substantial deviation from the Development Order, as defined within Subsection 380.06(19), F.S. 1. DRI #65 Tampa Palms, City of Tampa (Sustainable Community) 2. DRI #191 FishHawk Ranch, Hillsborough County Additional Material: Staff Reports. D. DRI STATUS MATRIX The following listing identifies the status of all "active" DRIs in the various levels of the review process - INFORMATION ONLY Additional Material: DRI Status Matrix. E. REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND REVIEW (IC&R) REPORTS DETERMINED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH STRATEGIC REGIONAL POLICY PLAN. 1. IC&R 9231-99 Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) FY 2000-2004 Transportation Improvement Program 2. IC&R 4248-99 Apollo Beach (Harbor Bay) Phase I, SWFWMD #4918838.003, Hillsborough County 3. IC&R #249-99 Pasco County MPO FY 2000-2004 Transportation Improvement Program Additional Material: Respective Reports for items above. F. SUMMARY OF MONTHLY IC&R APPLICATIONS PROCESSED A summary has been provided regarding the IC&R applications processed during the period of July 13, 1999 to August 9, 1999. Additional Material: Monthly Report. 3 G. DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT REPORT DRI #141 - Westshore Areawide, City of Tampa It has been determined that the Development Order amendment issued by the City of Tampa will not create a substantial deviation. Additional Material: Development Order Amendment Report for DRI #141 MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA Agenda Item #3 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA - DISCUSSION Agenda Item #4 DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES NONE B. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NONE C. NOTICES OF PROPOSED CHANGE - INCONSISTENT NONE D. ANNUAL REPORTS INCONSISTENT WITH THEIR DEVELOPMENT ORDERS 1. DRI #66 Tara, Manatee County, RY 1997-98 2. DRI #149 Vandenburg Airport Expansion, Hillsborough County, RY 1997-98 3. DRI #163 Cannon Ranch, Pasco County, RYs 1993-99 4. DRI #166 Wesley Chapel Lakes, Pasco County, RY 1997-98 5. DRI #172 Bradenton Municipal Marina, City of Bradenton, RY 1997-98 6. DRI #189 Big Basin Commerce Park, Hillsborough County, RY 1997-98 7. DRI #211 Meadow Pointe (aka Trout Creek Substantial Deviation, Pasco County, RY 1997-98 Additional Material: Annual Report Summary. Action Recommended: Motion to concur with staff report. 4 r, Agenda Item #5 REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND REVIEW REPORTS (To be discussed individually - others may appear under the Consent Agenda) IC&R #261-99 West Pasco Industrial Park, FSC #FL9908040646C, Pasco County Additional Material: Staff report. Action Recommended: Motion to concur with staff report. Agenda Item #6 CRC SUBCOMMITTEES A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A status report on activities related to the Council's Regional Economic Model will be presented. B. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT VICE MAYOR HOLMES A brief status report on emergency management activities will be presented including the CRC's Emergency Management Committee initiatives, the Council's application for a regional Project Impact designation and the update of the hurricane evacuation study. C. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION A brief report general report will be presented, including updates on the Governor's designation of non-attainment areas. D. COMMUNITY VISIONING Staff will make a Powerpointo presentation on some of the work being done related to the community visioning program. Agenda Item #7 OTHER BUSINESS - CHAIRMAN Agenda Item #8 ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEXT MEETING DATE September 27, 1999, 9:30 a.m. - TBRPC Offices Agenda Item #9 ADJOURN 5 Gust, Mike From: Gust, Mike Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 11:51 AM To: Jones, Gary Cc: Quillen, Michael; Bertels, Paul Subject: Park Place DRI / NOPC I have reviewed subject Transportation Methodology Report by Robert Pergolizzi with Florida Design Consultants and offer the following comments: 1. Use of the trip generation fitted curve equation is acceptable as long as it is not mixed with same use average rate for most suitable results. 2. The internal capture rate of 15% was scrutinized in the original DRI review and I do not recall if it was accepted or reduced. I would not recommend that it be an accepted standard. 3. 1 am not familiar with the " 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour capacity " standard for analyzing impacted roadways within the study area. This does not seem consistent with the intent of Clearwater's Land Development Regulation Section 4-802. 4. Reports should not assume that everyone reading them knows all the acronyms contained within - first time use should be accommodated with full name as was done with HCM and TIP. ie: NOPC ? FSUTMS ? (1[ ?e( plmfe /P/I/r n/ Con??rO dt? Page 1 T TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY REPORT FOR PARK PLACE DRI/NOPC 1. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and east of U.S. 19. Park Place (DRI #92) was originally approved in 1983 to contain the following uses with an expected buildout date of 1999: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f. Office 1,103,000 s.f. Several NOPC have modified the Development Order including modifications of land uses, extension ofbuildout and establishment ofland use trade-offinechanisms. These modifications have extended the buildout to December 31, 2000 and approved the following uses: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f.* Office 795,520 s.f.* Light Industrial 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office/hotel on Parcel 4. The Park Place DRI is almost fully built-out and most actual construction has been at densities well below approved levels. The applicant wishes to extend the buildout date to December 31, 2002. A detailed traffic analysis will be prepared to evaluate whether this proposed change results in additional impacts. Specifically three (3) items will be evaluated. 1. Whether the proposed change results in a 15%o increase in PM peak hour external trips generated by the project. 2. Whether the projected PM peak hour traffic volume in the revised buildout year (2002) are greater than those predicted in the original buildout year (1991). 3. Whether any projected increase results in unacceptable levels of service and necessary improvements above and beyond those included in the Development Order. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions will be established by conducting PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts at several signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project. All traffic counts will be converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. Existing conditions will be analyzed using 1998 FDOT LOS Handbook procedures to include roadway specific traffic and signalization characteristics. Intersections will be analyzed using the 1997 HiQhwU CWacity Manual (HCM) procedures as replicated by the HCS software. i III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS IV. BACKGROUND GROWTH Existing traffic on the roadway network will be adjusted to reflect background traffic in the revised buildout year. This will be done using a 2.5% annual growth rate which was approved and used in previous NOPC analysis. V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the revised project will be made using ITE Trip Generation. 6 h Edition. For the revised project a 15% internal capture will be applied as was approved in the 1996 NOPC. As was approved in all previous NOPC traffic analysis, a 2.5% transit capture will be applied for PSTA routes. Retail pass-by capture will be based on ITE and will not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. B. Trip Distribution project traffic distribution will be based on the FSUTMS Regional Transportation Analysis model for the year 2005 and is shown in Figure 1. A list of roadway improvements programmed for construction within the first three (3) years of the WO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program will be included. A preliminary list, which is subject to change is shown below: Ar C. Study Area Delineation The project impact study area will include all roadway segments where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour maximum service flow rate of the segment. D. Capacity Analysis Although the study area will be based on full DRI traffic, much of the DRI traffic is already on the roadway system and will be included in the traffic counts. To avoid double counting, the amount of external traffic from existing Park Place development will be calculated using ITE Trip Generation, 6`' Edition. The amount of external trips from the built portion will be deducted from existing traffic and only new (unbuilt) Park Place traffic will be added. This is the same procedure that was approved for use in the 1994 NOPC traffic analysis. Due to the interconnecting of parking areas with non-DRI businesses actual driveway counts should not be used to determine existing DRI traffic. New (unbuilt) traffic will be added to accumulate background traffic to estimate total expected traffic in the revised buildout year (2002). The projected volumes in the revised buildout year will be compared to those projected for the original buildout year (1991). Roadway segments where projected 2002 volume exceeds the originally approved volume will be analyzed in detail to determine PM peak hour LOS and improvements. This analysis will be done on a peak hour basis in accordance with FDOT 1998 LOS Handbook practices. VI. CONCLUSION Existing conditions will be established by obtaining traffic counts in the vicinity of the project and analyzing traffic conditions using HCS and FDOT ART-TAB/ART-PLAN software. Background traffic will be adjusted to the revised buildout year using a 2.5% annual growth rate. External trip generation will be estimated using TTE Trip Generation, 6' Edition, with appropriate internal capture, transit capture and pass-by capture. Proj ect traffic will be distributed to the roadway system using FSUTMS and roadway where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour "capacity" will be included in the study area. Projected 2002 traffic will be compared with originally approved traffic and roadways where the approved volume would be exceeded will be analyzed in detail. For these roads analyzed in detail the expected LOS and improvements necessary will be determined. These improvements will be compared to those in the original Development Order. :es RApark place.wpd PARK PLACE DRI ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPROVED PLAN TRIP GENERATION LAND ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL . USE LUC UNITS TRIPS -TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT OFFIC E 710 198,000 S.F 2242 301 30 271 46 225 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 480,000 S.F 4427 617 62 555 94 461 OFFIC E 710 125,000 S.F 1575 219 22 197 34 163 RETAIL 820 135,000 S.F 8267 765 76 689 331 358 RETAIL 820 15,000 S.F. 2012 180 18 162 78 84 TOTAL 22147 2576 258 2318 659 1659 PROPOSED AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 8 188 23 165 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 74 155 104 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 240,560 S.F 2604 348 11 337 57 280 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 106 318 153 165. 8 OFFICE 710 124,860 S.F 1574 219 10 209 36 173: 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 62 195 94 101 TOTAL 16901 1866 280 1586 498 1088 WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS PARCEL # LAND USE ITE LUC UNITS DAILY TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL AUTO ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 188 183 22 161 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 155 151 101 50 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149, 5&6 OFFICE 710 240,560 S.F 2604 348 337 328 56 272- 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 318 310 149 161 8 OFFICE 710 124,860 S.F 1574 .219 209 204 35 169' 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 195 190 91 99 TOTAL 16901 1866 1586 1546 485 1061 WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE PARCEL # LAND USE ITE LUC UNITS DAILY TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL AUTO TRIPS EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO AUTO AUTO TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 183 183 22 161 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 151 151 101 50 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 240,560 S.F 2604 348 328 328 56 272. 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 310 143 69 74, 8 OFFICE 710. 124,860 S.F 1574 219 204 204 35 169 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 190 55 26 29 TOTAL 16901 1866 1546 1244 340 904 NOTES: 1. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASSBY TRIPS 2. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION, 5TH EDITION AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 3. RETAIL SPACE IS AS ACTUALLY EXISTS AND TOTALS 81,120 S.F. 4. TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT IS 1,244 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS YYE ERPRISE RD t- 0 0 t z } W J N ? N_ S U SUNSET POINT RD. x -'x- MAIN ST f? + W CR 590 U n > k-n- CLEVELAND 2X Q W DREW $T. Ix 31Xez 7x ax ST. N ST -- d x lox 13x ? 16x' rn 38X f 6X w M F?? M GULF TO. N BAY2X BLVD.; DRUID RD. N 4 x ny ? 11 9?C NURSERY RD. 2x ?-- 1x BELLEAIR RD. 12 = d gl-'THAINES A 12 BAYSHORE A 4 ? ? Pl W 11 W = z u W J W W Y m 17 lx 3% M M f? EAST BAY DR ROOSEVELT ?L n x h PROJECT DESCRIPTION No. PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 172-07 DATE. FIGURE. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 7/99 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN By. 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwaler FL. 33759 Tel. (727)724-8422 - Fa:. (727)724-8606 BHB § 131.136 CLEARWATER CODE Sec. 131.136. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in CP districts are as follows: (1) Multi-family dwellings as regulated in RM-28 districts, not less than four (4) acres in area. (2) Commercial and other uses: a. Minimum lot area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. b. Minimum building setback: 1. Front and side street: Forty (40) feet. 2. Side: Twenty (20) feet. 3. Rear: Twenty (20) feet. c. Maximum building coverage: Forty-five (45) per cent. Maximum impermeable lot coverage: Seventy-five (75) per cent. d. Maximum height: Fifty (50) feet general, eighty (80) feet office building. (3) Special requirements applicable to all CP districts where the county land use plan designates an area under the residential/office/retail plan category shall be as follows: a. Residential and hotel/motel facilities are limited to fifteen (15) units per net acre; b. A maximum of fifty (50) per cent of the site may be covered in impervious surface; and c. In the case of retail or office usage, a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of two- tenths (.2) may be substituted for the restriction regarding impervious surface coverage. In this event the otherwise applicable maximum impermeable surface coverage requirement of seventy-five (75) per cent shall apply. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.04; Ord. No. 2293, § 19, 2-5-81; Ord. No. 3049, § 1, 4-21-83) Sec. 131.137. Fences and walls. Pences and walls in CP districts are regulated in section 131.205. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.05) Sec. 131.138. Off-street parking. Off-street parking in CP districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.07) Sec. 131.139. Off-street loading. Off-street loading in CP districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.06) Division 20. CG General Business District Sec. 131.140. General description. The CG district permits apartment type development, retail and professional uses. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.01) Supp. No. 13 1142 BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS § 131.141 Sec. 131.141. Permitted uses and structures. (a) The following are permitted uses and structures ifn, CG districts: (1) Multiple dwellings as regulated in RM-28, except in conjunction with any commer- cial use of the property such multiple dwellings shall. be as, regulated in RM-20 and that within the core CBD, a density of thirty-four (34) units per net acre shall be allowed; (2) Townhouse development as regulated in section 131.198; (3) Hotels and motels- For density for core central business district, eighty-one (81) hotel-motel units per net acre, forty-twc (42) hotel-motel units per net acre otherwise; (4) Financial institutions; (5) Retail stores and sales; (6) Eating and drinking establishments; (7) Personal and business service establishments; " %ft r? ?J? l '-y (8) Commercial job printing; -F "`n` ??d (9) Repair service for items brought in by customers; - 1 v 0,(-,i cn c 5-10 (10) Professional', business and. trade schools; 1 4•t. +T-. • T (11) Research, design and development activities and accessory laboratory where there is no heavy equipment used, no unreasonable noise, fumes, dirt, or dust created and all operation is within building and any incidental product that is manufactured is not for sale; (12) Public buildings; (13) Theaters, not drive-in and other cultural, entertainment uses; (14) Churches (as regulated in division 25 of this article and section 131.204); P"° Q s A-0 J" (15) Railway terminal and/or freight office; (16) Service stations as regulated in section 131.202; (17) Lodges and private clubs; (18) Professional, business office. (b) -The entire area occupied by a secondary salvage or junk operation shall be screened by a continuous, attractive seventy-five (75) per cent opaque masonry, metal (not corrugated sheet metal or other roofing material), wood fence or wall, at a minimum of eight (8)- feet in height. Such fence or wall shall be without openings, except for entrance and exit, which opening shall be equipped with opaque gates. Supplemental planting shall be required along the fence or wall on that portion abutting any street right-of-way. Reasonable care and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.02;. Ord. No. 2039, § 18, 2-21-80) Supp. No. 14 1143 l § 131.142 CLEARWATER CODE Sec. 131.142. Special exceptions. The following are permitted in CG districts as regulated in sections 131.016 and 131.203: (1) Storage yards, when shielded from view from any public way (wall, solid fence and/or screen planting); (2) Transfer and storage establishments; = / "Jc" 0 es -$ O A-Ts - 1- t -L X) "2 A-6. l (3) Certain fabricating processing and manufacturing conducted under following conditions: Such uses shall be so constructed, maintained and operated as not to be injurious or offensive to the occupants of adjacent premises by reason of the emission or creation of noise, vibration, smoke, dust or other particular matter, toxic or noxious waste materials, odors, fire and explosive hazard or glare. All processes and storage, except storage for vehicles, shall be in completely closed buildings; (4) Operations involving wholesaling, supply and distribution with or without warehousing, but not more than five thousand (5,000) square feet of storage area; (5) Service, renovation and repair establishments, business service establishments, including printing (when entirely within closed building); (6) Automotive body repair provided all operations are within an enclosed r - structure; no vehicles needing repair to be stored outside overnight, unless in an area completely screened from view by opaque fence or suitable planting; doors to face away from any residential zone; hours of operation and conditional requirements of board of adjustment and appeal to be made of record; (7) Salvage or junk operations only as an accessory and/or secondary use; (8) Single-family and duplexes per RS-50 (single-family) or RM-12 (Duplex apartment) district standards respectively; (9) Commercial, express pick-up helicopter stations, not involving helicopter landing (provided federal and state licensing provisions are met); (10) Vehicle/equipment sales and service; (11) Marina facilities, types Band C; = e. ?d fl>ti?n ° ?'? " ` t (12) Customary home occupations; PI, 1 (13) Veterinary offices/animal hospitals; 1 ? M AA_ (- 1Z °a M I IJr T (14) Commercial parking lots; - eJ s 4-4-,J I) S -A-a (15) Level H group care facilities. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.03; Ord. No. 2039, § 18, 2-21-80; Ord. o. 2763, § 4, 8-5-82; Ord. No. 2896, § 5, 12-9-82; Ord. No. 3231, § 5, 11-3-83; Ord. No. 3234, § 3, 11-3-83; Ord. No. 3317, § 1, 1-5-84) Supp. No. 14 1144 BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS § 131.144 '%? Sec. 131.143. Prohibited uses. - N The following are prohibited uses in CG districts: (1) All types of occupancies from which are?emitted smokes, fumes, gases or odors detrimental to the comfort,. enjoyment and health of surrounding persons or occupants; (2) New or used automobile parts sales from vacant lots; (3) Creosote treatment or manufacture; (4) Distillation of bones, coal or wood; (5) Fertilizer manufacture; a (6) Fish hous, wholesale, also fish smuking, curing or processing plants; (7) Salvage or junk operations as a primary function; (8) Lumber yard or mill work; (9) Mobile home parks; (10) Heliports and helistops (this prohibition shall not apply to helicopters engaged in performing emergency or law enforcement activities). (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.04; Ord. No. 2039, § 18, 2-21-80; Ord. No. 3025, § 2, 3-14-83) Sec. 131.144. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in CG districts are as follows: (1) Waterfront lots as regulated in section 131.200. (2) Multifamily residential uses as regulated in RM-28 districts; except in conjunction with any commercial use of the property, such multiple dwellings shall be as regulated in RM-20. In the Core CBD maximum allowable coverage can be increased to seventy (70) per cent and FAR not to exceed two (2.0) maximum. In the defined Core CBD only one side building setback shall be required and no rear setback shall be required. (3) All other uses: a. Minimum area: None required. b. Lot width: None required. c. Minimum setbacks: 4 3<a OJ ? ?• ? ?? iJy rlu o w? ?` ?? 1. Front and side street: U . ? - IA, i. Any building or portion of such building with a height of twenty v? (20) feet or less shall have a required front and side street setback of / fifteen (15) feet. ? v ii. Any building or portion of such building with a height greater than Q t?(" twenty (20) feet shall have a required front and side street setback equal to fifteen (15) feet plus twenty-five (25) per cent of the height -' of the building or portion thereof above twenty (20) feet. Supp. No. 13 1145 § 131.144 CLEARWATER CODE 2. Side: i. Portions of buildings on contiguous properties which provide a com- bined separation distance of one foot or less at a common side lot ' l? ' ' line shall be exempt from any minimum required setback from such l d I <V J common ot line; sai setback exemption to be limited to the height . du of the lowest building portion and the length of the shortest build- ing portion so separated. ii. Any building or portion of such building which does not qualify for the side setback exemption allowed under the preceding paragraph 2.i. and which has a height of twenty (20) feet or less shall have a minimum side setback of ten (10) feet. iii. Any building or portion of such building which does not qualify for the side setback exemption allowed under paragraph 2.i. and which has a height greater than twenty (20) feet shall have a required side setback equal to ten (10) feet plus twenty-five (25) per cent of the height of the building or portion thereof above twenty (20) feet. 3. Rear: i. Any building or portion of such building with a height of twenty (20) feet or less shall have a required rear setback of ten (10) feet. ii. Any building or portion of such building with a height greater than twenty (20) feet shall have a required rear setback equal to ten (10) feet plus twenty-five (25) per cent of the height of the building or portion thereof above twenty (20) feet. d. Maximum height: Eighty (80) feet; however, the height maximum in the defined Core CBD shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet. e. Maximum building coverage: Sixty (60) per cent. Maximum impermeable lot coverge: Eighty-five (85) per cent. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.05; Ord. No. 2039, § 18, 2-21-80; Ord. No. 2293, § 20, 2-5-81; Ord. No. 3269, § 1, 12-8-83) Sec. 131.145. Fences and walls. Fences and walls in CG districts are regulated in section 131.205. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.06) Sec. 131.146. Off-street parking and loading. Off-street parking and loading in CG districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.07) t Supp. No. 13 1146 s ? BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS § 131.119 c. - No additional or replacement mobile home unit, or addition or change to a mobile home unit, will be permitted in an existing mobile home park unless and until a plot plan is submitted consisting of a line drawing, approximately to scale, locating and identifying the lot on which the mobile home unit is proposed to be.located, including all pertinent dimensions with respect to the size of the unit, its placement on the lot and its proximity to adjoining units and appurte- nant structures, in a form acceptable to the building department. (Ord. No. 2522, § 2, 12-17-81; Ord. No. 2741, § 1, 9-2-82) Sec. 131.116. Definitions. Definitions applicable to this chapter shall include mobile home, mobile home lot, mobile home park and mobile home park property lines. These terms shall be defined as follows and shall supersede and replace the corresponding definitions in section 131.006: Mobile home: A single-story structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is more than eight (8) body feet in width and is thirty-two (32) body feet or more in length, and which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed to be used as a dwelling with or without permanent foundation, when connected to the required utilities, and includes plumbing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems contained therein. Mobile home lot A subparcel of land in a mobile home park designated for the accommo- dation of one mobile home and its accessory uses for the exclusive use of the occupants of the mobile home. Mobile home park.- A parcel of land zoned RMH and devoted to mobile home development, including individual mobile home lots and common facilities for maintenance, service and recreation. Mobile home park property lines: The boundaries of the mobile home park. (Ord. No. 2522, § 2, 12-17-81; Ord. No. 2741, § 2, 9-2-82) Sec. 131.117. Reserved. Division 17. PS Professional Services District See. 131.118. General description. A P$ district is created to provide an area for professional services with complementary multiple-family dwellings, motel and hotel uses. (Code 1962, App. A, J 20.01) t, Sec. 131.119. Permitted uses and structures. In a PS district, no premises or buildings shall be used or occupied and no buildings shall be hereafter erected or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided in this chapter, except for one or more of the following uses: Supp. No. 10 1135 i § 131.1 19 CLEARWATER CODE A K 5 r?Ci „? L 2 w_? N/may (1) Multiple dwellings as regulated in the RM-12 district. r -VT M'z'~` 0 3 /b/$Z - IZE? • Pdz (2) Townhouse development as regulated in section 131.198. (3) Government services. c,p ?+ t_? ? ?/•1-'tom ?? 7? ?t?4-?? (4) Professional services: C &I Al n S Y t 72 • ' "1 ??? b a. Offices directly related to medical services(= b. Legal offices; c. Architectural and engineering, drafting, clerical, machine reproduction such as needed in above; d. Consultant services, research, tax. (5) Business and commercial services: a. Banks, investment and finance, title and abstract, real estate and insurance, stenographic services, bonding, stockbroker. b. Retail within structure*: Maximum of such usage to be limited to twenty-five (25) per cent of the ground floor area or four hundred (400) square feet, whichever is the lesser. 1. Drugs, books, newsstand; 2. Snack bar and restaurant or cafeteria; 3. Stationery and office supply (business machine servicing)4,-w * No signage shall be displayed outside the building advertising this retail service to the public. (6) Family care facilities as regulated in section 131.2056. (Code 1962, App. A, § 20.02; Ord. No. 2039, § 16, 2-21-80; Ord. No. 2772, § 14A, 8-19-82) Sec. 131.126. Special exceptions. The following are permitted as special exceptions in PS districts as regulated in section 131.016: (1) Retail within structure as defined in section 131.119, but in excess of four hundred (400) square feet; - (2) Other professional services similar to those listed in section 131.119; A 'a • 44 a S (3) Expansion of existing churches (also see section 131.204); ? V, Yk it. (4) Convalescent homes; (5) Mortuary or funeral homes; (6) Day nursery; , i• C- • 1) A*`I C . (17'c (7) Noncommercial off-street parking lots; (8) Commercial, express pick-up helicopter stations, not involving helicopter landing (provided federal and state licensing provisions are met); Supp. No. 10 1136 BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS § 131.124 (9) Level I and II group care and congregate care facilities as regulated in sections 131.016 and 131.2056; (10) Customary home occupations. (Ord. No. 2772, § 14B, 8-19-82; Ord. No. 2896, § 4, 12-9-82) Sec. 131.121. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in PS districts are as follows: (1) Waterfront lots as regulated in section 131.200. (2) Professional and related uses: a. Minimum lot area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. b. Lot width: No minimum. c. Yard setbacks: 1. Front and side street: Ten (10) foot setback for two-story structure, twenty (20) foot fronting an "R" zone; fifteen (15) foot setback above two (2) stories,. 2. Side and rear: Ten (10) feet; for building greater than. twenty (20) feet in height, the rear and side setback of ten (10) feet shall be increased by one foot for each four (4) feet of total height. d. Maximum height: Thirty (30) feet. e. Maximum building coverage: Forty-five (45) per cent. Maximum impermeable lot coverage: Seventy (70) per cent. (3) Residential development: As regulated in the RM-12 district. (Code 1962, App. A, § 20.04; Ord. No. 2039, § 16, 2-21-80; Ord. No. 2293, § 17, 2-5-81; Ord. No. 3034, § 2, 4-4-83) Sec. 131.122. Fences and walls. Fences and walls in PS districts are regulated in section 131.205. (Code 1962, App. A, § 20.05) Sec. 131.123. Off-street parking. Off-street parking in PS districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, § 20.06) Sec. 131.124. Off-street loading and unloading. Off-street loading and unloading in PS districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, § 20.07) Supp. No. 11 1136.1 e TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY REPORT FOR PARK PLACE DRI/NOPC 1. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and east of U.S. 19. Park Place (DRI #92) was originally approved in 1983 to contain the following uses with an expected buildout date of 1999: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f. Office 1,103,000 s.f. Several NOPC have modified the Development Order including modifications of land uses, extension ofbuildout and establishment of land use trade-off mechanisms. These modifications have extended the buildout to December 31, 2000 and approved the following uses: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f.* Office 795,520 s.f.* Light Industrial 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office/hotel on Parcel 4. The Park Place DRI is almost fully built-out and most actual construction has been at densities well below approved levels. The applicant wishes to extend the buildout date to December 31, 2002. A detailed traffic analysis will be prepared to evaluate whether this proposed change results in additional impacts. Specifically three (3) items will be evaluated. 1. Whether the proposed change results in a 15% increase in PM peak hour external trips generated by the project. 2. Whether the projected PM peak hour traffic volume in the revised buildout year (2002) are greater than those predicted in the original buildout year (1991). 3. Whether any projected increase results in unacceptable levels of service and necessary improvements above and beyond those included in the Development Order. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions will be established by conducting PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts at several signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project. All traffic counts will be converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. Existing conditions will be analyzed using 1998 FDOT LOS Handbook procedures to include roadway specific traffic and signalization characteristics. Intersections will be analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures as replicated by the HCS software. III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS A list of roadway improvements programmed for construction within the first three (3) years of the MPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program will be included. A preliminary list, which is subject to change is shown below: PLANNED/PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Segment Improvement Construction Year Agency Drew Street (Highland - N.E. Coachman) Widen to 4LD 2000/01 FDOT #2572570331 U.S. 19/Drew Street Interchange 1999/00 FDOT #2569571 U.S. 19 (S. of S.R. 590 - N. of Sunset Point) Interchange 2002/03 FDOT #2568881 Keene Road (Druid to Drew) Widen to 6LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Drew - Sunset Point) Construct 4LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Sunset Point - Virginia) Widen to 4LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920487 Drew/McMullen Booth Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #922051 S.R. 590/McMullen Booth Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #922051 S.R. 590/Old Coachman Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #921313 IV. BACKGROUND GROWTH Existing traffic on the roadway network will be adjusted to reflect background traffic in the revised buildout year. This will be done using a 2.5% annual growth rate which was approved and used in previous NOPC analysis. V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the revised project will be made using ITE Trip Generation, 6 h Edition. For the revised project a 15% internal capture will be applied as was approved in the 1996 NOPC. As was approved in all previous NOPC traffic analysis, a 2.5% transit capture will be applied for PSTA routes. Retail pass-by capture will be based on ITE and will not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. B. Trip Distribution Project traffic distribution will be based on the FSUTMS Regional Transportation Analysis model for the year 2005 and is shown in Figure 1. C. Study Area Delineation The project impact study area will include all roadway segments where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour maximum service flow rate of the segment. D. Capacity Analysis Although the study area will be based on full DRI traffic, much of the DRI traffic is already on the roadway system and will be included in the traffic counts. To avoid double counting, the amount of external traffic from existing Park Place development will be calculated using ITE Trip Generation, 6`' Edition. The amount of external trips from the built portion will be deducted from existing traffic and only new (unbuilt) Park Place traffic will be added. This is the same procedure that was approved for use in the 1994 NOPC traffic analysis. Due to the interconnecting of parking areas with non-DRI businesses actual driveway counts should not be used to determine existing DRI traffic. New (unbuilt) traffic will be added to accumulate background traffic to estimate total expected traffic in the revised buildout year (2002). The projected volumes in the revised buildout year will be compared to those projected for the original buildout year (1991). Roadway segments where projected 2002 volume exceeds the originally approved volume will be analyzed in detail to determine PM peak hour LOS and improvements. This analysis will be done on a peak hour basis in accordance with FDOT 1998 LOS Handbook practices. VI. CONCLUSION Existing conditions will be established by obtaining traffic counts in the vicinity of the project and analyzing traffic conditions using HCS and FDOT ART-TAB/ART-PLAN software. Background traffic will be adjusted to the revised buildout year using a 2.5% annual growth rate. External. trip generation will be estimated using ITE Trip Generation, 6`' Edition, with appropriate internal capture, transit capture and pass-by capture. Project traffic will be distributed to the roadway system using FSUTMS and roadway where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour "capacity" will be included in the study area. Projected 2002 traffic will be compared with originally approved traffic and roadways where the approved volume would be exceeded will be analyzed in detail. For these roads analyzed in detail the expected LOS and improvements necessary will be determined. These improvements will be compared to those in the original Development Order. :es RApark place.wpd PARK PLACE DRI ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPROVED PLAN TRIP GENERATION LAND USE ITE LUC UNITS DAILY TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS TOTAL TOTAL INTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT OFFIC E 710 198,000 S.F 2242 301 30 271 46 225' OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 1841 OFFIC E 710 480,000 S.F 4427 617 62 555 94 461 OFFIC E 710 125,000 S.F 1575 219 22 197 34 163 RETAIL 820 135,000 S.F 8267 765 76 689 331 358 RETAIL 820 15,000 S.F. 2012 180 18 162 78 84 TOTAL 22147 2576 258 2318 659 1659 PROPOSED AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 8 188 23 165 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 74 155 104 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 9 184 31 1531 5&6 OFFICE 710 240,560 S.F 2604 348 11 337 57 280 j 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 106 318 153 165i 8 OFFICE 710 124,860 S.F 1574 219 10 209 36 173 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 62 195 94 101, 16901 1866 280 WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% 498 1088 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS EXTERNAL AUTO ENTER EXIT 1 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 188 183 22 161 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 155 151 101 501 , 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149 i 5&6 OFFICE 710 240,560 S.F 2604 348 337 328 56 272 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 318 310 149 161 8 OFFICE 710 124,860 S.F 1574 219 209 204 35 169 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 195 190 91 991 AL 16901 1866 1586 WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE 485 1061 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL AUTO TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO AUTO PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS AUTO TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 183 183 22 161 i 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 151 151 101 501 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 240,560 S.F 2604 348 328 328 56 272 , 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 310 143 69 741 8 OFFICE 710 124,860 S.F 1574 219 204 204 35 1691 1 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S ,F 2856 257 190 55 26 291 TOTAL 16901 1866 1546 1244 340 904 NOTES: 1. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASSBY TRIPS 2. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION, 5TH EDITION AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 3. RETAIL SPACE IS AS ACTUALLY EXISTS AND TOTALS 81,120 S.F. 4. TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT IS 1,244 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS ENTERPRISE RD ? 0 0 .? as 1X Z n? W J J NI U MAIN ST SUNSET POINT RD. '% ?- > a } 27 Q M CR 590 W. 0 .. 0 ? L) X 0 In w fu N N T DREW $T. 1X % .' 87 - % 31X- 8X 7Y. 2% M __9 CLEVELAND ST. ST -? N IOY. 13% 16% 20X 222 38X? 6% 5% M 41 M ?'? M ?? M GULF TO X N BAY,,, BLVD.; DRUID RD. N 7 , NURSERY RD. 2% lX BELLEAIR RD. MIX " f? to d o} HAINES 1X BAYSHORE A tY Cz a? W 1 W = Z U W -J W w Y A i% 1% 3Y. A w EAST BAY DR ROOSEVELT <L DESCRIPTION. PROJECT No. PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 172--07 DATE, FIGURE. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 7/99 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY. 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearweler FL, 33759 Tel. (727)724-8422 - Fax. (727)724-8606 BHB JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE W. BARNES JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR ALEXIS P. BROOKS GUY M. BURNS MICHAEL T. CRONIN DUANE A. DAIKER ELIZABETH J. DANIELS LISA B. DODGE MARION HALE REBECCA A. HENSON JAMES W. HUMANN SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.* MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT DAVID J. OTTINGER F. WALLACE POPE, JR. DARRYL R. RICHARDS DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS JOHN A. SCHAEFER BETHANNSCHARRER PHILIP M. SHASTEEN CHARLES M.TATELBAUM JOAN M. VECCHIOLI ANTHONY P. ZINGE JULIUS J. ZSCHAU *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE No. 32112.91763 November 23, 1994 HAND DELIVERY Mr. Scott Shuford ??, A ?P1z1 City of Clearwater 10 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, FL 34616 _- Re: Notice of Proposed Change to Park Place DRI - Revised Ordinance Dear Scott.- We have received additional comments from John Baker of the Department of Community Affairs concerning the Notice of Proposed Change application. Enclosed are ten copies of the revised ordinance, with revisions highlighted. The following is a cumulative list of the revisions to the ordinance since our October 27 submittal: 1. We added a provision to the conversion factor section (Section 4.AA of the development order) requiring the developer to notify DCA and TBRPC within thirty days prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factor. 2. The maximum number of residential units was decreased from 511 to 510 to be consistent with the City's calculations. 3. Map H was revised to reflect the development entitlements allocated to each parcel and Note 4 was added to Map H to reflect that in the event of any CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 SUITE 1800 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617-1368 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TELEPHONE: (813) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100 TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. . ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Scott Shuford November 23, 1994 Page 2 conversion to residential development, such residential development may be located on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 only. 4. At the request of DCA, we added a section concerning mass transit service to the project (Section 4.CC of the development order). 5. The section numbers of the "added" provisions were incorrect and, accordingly, we changed the references to 4.Q and 4.R to 4.AA and 4.BB, respectively. We are in receipt of the TBRPC comments dated November 22 and have forwarded the same to the project engineer, who will work with TBRPC concerning these comments. Preliminary discussions with the engineer indicate that the proposed changes will not reduce the level of service on S.R. 60; however, should any additional revision of the development order be required due to these comments, we will provide you with another set of ten copies of the revised ordinance. Please contact me immediately if you have any questions or comments concerning the revised ordinance. Have a nice Thanksgiving holiday. Sincerely, ?,?, e• Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant js encl. cc w/encl: Mr. Tim Butts, TBRPC Mr. John Baker, DCA Mr. James Stefan 0055476.01/js JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE W. BARNES JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ROBERT M. DAISLEY ELIZABETH J. DANIELS MARION HALE JAMES W. HUMANN SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. AMANDA C. KAISER SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.* MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. DONALD P. REED DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS JOHN A. SCHAEFER PHILIP M. SHASTEEN CLAY C. SCHUETT PIERCY J. STAKELUM IV JOAN M. VECCHIOLI AMBER F. WILLIAMS JULIUS J. ZSCHAU *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 37413.95209 August 2, 1999 Gary L. Jones, A.I.C.P. Senior Planner City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Park Place DRI Notice of Proposed Change Application Dear Gary: It was nice meeting you in person on Friday, July 30. Enclosed for your information as we go through the NOPC application process are the following documents pertaining to the Park Place DRI: 1. Complete copy of the Development Order and all amendments, including revised Map H, as approved by Ordinance No. 6107-96; and 2. Annual Status Report for the year ending September 1, 1998. If you need any additional information, please feel free to call or e-mail me PP ECEHE AW -4NO • & DEVELOPMENT cc: SWIV k Shackletor CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-1368 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER (727) 441-8617 BANKRUPTCY TELECOPIER (727) 443-6548 Sincerely, ? '?? I . J_?? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant TAMPA OFFICE 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602-5145 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118 NAPLES OFFICE 975 SIXTH AVE. S POST OFFICE BOX 1368 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (941) 435-0035 TELECOPIER: (941) 435-9992 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS August 2, 1999 Mr. John Meyer, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 RE: Park Place DRI - NOPC (DRI #92) Dear John: Enclosed are three (3) copies of the Transportation Methodology Report for the Park Place DRI - NOPC. We look forward to the methodology meeting at your office on August 13, 1999 (9:30 A.M.) If you have any questions, please call me at (727)724-8422. Sincerely, RobertC. Per AICP Vice President/Transportation :sp L:\meyer-3.wpd Encl. cc: Gary Dories, City_of-flea r Kent Fast, FDOT Carol Collins, DCA Ramon Solis, Pinellas County David Winkle, Hillsborough County Roger Larson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al Nicholas Shackleton, Clinton Commercial Group File 172-07.500 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8606 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ?O LA December 3, 1992 \11? Mr. James Polatty, Director 9455 Koger Boulevard Planning & Development St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 City of Clearwater (813) 577-5151/Tampa 224.9380 P.O. BOX 4748 Suncom 586-3217 Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748 Officers Dear Mr. Polatty: Chairman Mr. C. Coleman Stipanovich Subject: Nonsubmittal of DRI.Annual .Report Vice Chairman DRI # 92 -(Park Place (Metro), 9/1/92 J Councilman Robert B. Stewart Secretary/Treasurer Commissioner Lari Ann Harris Pursuant to Subsection 380.06 (18) Florida Statutes (F. S .) , this letter is notification that the annual report for the above- Executive Director referenced Development of Regional Impact (DRI) has not been Julia E. Greene submitted by the date specified in the Development Order. The regional planning council, or the state land planning agency (the Florida Department of Community Affairs), is required to notify the local government of failure by the DRI._develop er to _ submit an annual report. rSubsedti_on 380.06(18), F.S., also _ -requires-the-local government to request in writ irxf that the ` developer submit the delinquent report within 30 days, and states that; - "The failure to submit the report =after 30 days shall result in the-temporary--suspension'-of the development order by the local government." - Please copy this office on all future correspondence to the developer regarding this matter. If your records indicate a different due date than the one indicated in this letter, please transmit documentation of the new due date to Sandra Eberhard at TBRPC. Any Development Order amendments which actually change reporting or expiration dates should specify the new dates rather than only referencing extension by so many years, months, etc. This is important in regard to annual report due dates, phase completion dates and Development Order expiration dates. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, 0.CQ0TCA- Suzanne T. Cooper, AICP DRI Coordinator STC/lg cc: Ms. Julia Magee celeka, Mg 30 years Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 August 30, 1994 (813) 577-5151/Tampa 224-9380 Suncom 586-3217 Officers Mr. Scott Shuford City of Clearwater Chairman Mayor Charles A.Mclntosh, Jr. Central Permitting 10 South Missouri Avenue Vice-Chairman Councilman Clearwater, Florida 3461.6 Rudolf "Rudy" Fernandez Secretary/Treasurer Commissioner Dear Mr. Shuford: Richard A. Fitzgerald Re: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change Executive Director Julia E. Greene On August 30, 1994, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council received the Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) application for the above-referenced project pursuant to Section 9J-2.0252(2), Florida Administrative Code. The required contract and review fee deposit were received earlier. Within 30 calendar days (by September, 1994), the Council will notify the City of Clearwater of the results of our review. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tim Butts, AICP DRI Coordinator cc: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq. Ms. Julia Magee SEP 0 21994 CENTRAL PERMITTING CITY OF CLEARWATOM JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P. A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III ELIZABETH J. DANIELS SHARON E. KRICK BARBARA A. BACCARI LISA B. DODGE JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.- BRUCE W. BARNES MARION HALE MICHAEL G. LITTLE JOHN T BLAKELY REBECCA A. HENSON MICHAEL C. MARKHAM BRUCE H. BOKOR JAMES W. HUMANN DAVID J. OTTINGER ALEXIS P. BROOKS SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ F. WALLACE POPE, JR. GUY M. BURNS FRANK R. JAKES DARRYL R. RICHARDS MICHAEL T. CRONIN TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. DENNIS G. RUPPEL` August 31, 1994 Mr. Kent Fast The Florida Department of Transportation District 7 Office 11201 North McKinley Drive Tampa, FL 33612 Re: Park Place DRI Dear Mr. Fast: CHARLES A. SAMARKOS JOHN A. SCHAEFER BETHANN SCHARRER PHILIP M. SHASTEEN CHARLES M. TATELBAUM JOAN M. VECCHIOLI ANTHONY P. ZINGE JULIUS J. ZSCHAU * OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FIL3211.12.91761 Enclosed for the County's review is a copy of the Notice of Proposed Change Application concerning the Park Place DRI. Very truly yours, N mothy A. Johnson, Jr. TAJ:mme enclosure cc: Mr. Scott Shuford, City of Clearwater ? Mr. Tim Butts, TBRPC Mr. Tom Beck, DCA Mr. James Stefan, American Cyanamid Mr. Joe Kubicki, King Engineering Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, King Engineering 0049121.01 /mme CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617-1368 TELEPHONE (813) 461-1818 TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617 TAMPA OFFICE 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P, A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III ELIZABETH J. DANIELS SHARON E. KRICK BARBARA A. BACCARI LISA B. DODGE JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.` BRUCE W. BARNES MARION HALE MICHAEL G. LITTLE JOHN T. BLAKELY REBECCA A. HENSON MICHAEL C. MARKHAM BRUCE H. BOKOR JAMES W. HUMANN DAVID J. OTTINGER ALEXIS P. BROOKS SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ F. WALLACE POPE, JR. GUY M. BURNS FRANK R. JAKES DARRYL R. RICHARDS MICHAEL T CRONIN TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. DENNIS G. RUPPEL' CHARLES A. SAMARKOS JOHN A. SCHAEFER BETHANN SCHARRER PHILIP M. SHASTEEN CHARLES M. TATELBAUM JOAN M. VECCHIOLI ANTHONY P. ZINGE JULIUS J. ZSCHAU OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILS21-12.91761 August 31, 1994 Mr. Al Navaroli Pinellas County Zoning 440 Court Street Clearwater, FL 34616 Re: Park Place DRI Dear Al: Enclosed for the County's review is a copy of the Notice of Proposed Change Application concerning the Park Place DRI. Very truly yours, Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. TAJ:mme enclosure cc: Mr. Scott Shuford, City of Clearwater/ Mr. Tim Butts, TBRPC Mr. Tom Beck, DCA Mr. James Stefan, American Cyanamid Mr. Joe Kubicki, King Engineering Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, King Engineering 0049119.01 /mme CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3461 7-1 368 TELEPHONE (813) 461-1818 TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617 ? Lib SEP p2? CENTRAL PERMITTING CITY .9117 CiMARWATER TAMPA OFFICE 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118 p 281Q & 282A 282B c L7j CITY OF CLEARWATER - A R R AM VM%ffY b PENSUAS MUM. rL*R= a DREW ,t PREP RED Y w sl>.-,s.z S71iFEr 8 R A B = IF ! [[ ' ww..as a 764 PUBLIC OR MI ADI(INI MTl0N ,Qp -= w? i I1/Ol I i - { I ?seeae-aise? i a + .n,kMwn wl??-]n i i I I J ? I I a ?, r zfis '-- 266 - f 267 100 S YyUe 756 O V- ft.: .: (613)]62-475a.o e750, F- (813 61])52 526- I7ss nt m.etdwwat..n.a. N.//P? . /•,qh«r Bbdaln,e,: 28 2B ¢ ¢ ' I C q i AP Afer® .p` a,. n ba, I I i (' t' ?.--iJ ; i , 268 i 1 Pu011c In/ortnallan data u NmYhed or the CnY of aea nater PWlic Worts. Admnutratlon/En9-ihq, and moat he accepted that and a.ed e the - ie„t «1th the de etde6 O ' i C ' 72/01 l i I __ G > cab LT -r }????^T'I _ ?1 6' "° - 269 270 1 ' rv 271 p y p? q the??a recai d - mMacted for the of decal F inh ielract- tnv loey. A. cad,. the City of Clearwater PWA/E ma4w no «a,ranllw, •.prwaea or hV'., concwnlnq the ae.lacy aon'Wetmees, reYOOdrt , a, walam Y Y of n data for by?? I I J I _________________________-_ _?.--------- -_- a•n I I ' I r 'r a,0 ------.` I ?tirS• r 272 R ony oths portiM. = Furthermore, the City of aeaMOtr PWA/E aowm•e no IbEO Ry wZeeoe", a-dated e1U the ar a, meas. of ..h data A $ ' 1- F ----------------- __________________ i --- ___ , i I ?--- '- . F Ij I r $ R I I 1 , n-,73 '' ' e m e a OT 1 IW _____ lea At o, pops ry pario c qae. For Fform6an Uaul latest Welm, plea.a coo PWA/E m art o,a Web it,. ' -- - - - - - - - - - '? 1210 3 A r? R 3 2 N ?- 1 q ESL"' 111111 R I' §\NG`' a ?g" ??Y1 ?A / G 1 ?? S X22 01 ,al-lay ,ey-t.6 pl-lai I I II i _ _ -_ _ I ________. Is•-uz S g ,e0-,e2 >! ; J i S 7 K C o p??C? 61 Y^" /a ?'icea, ,t, yO 0 LI LOT 3 p C ' a ' 2a _ 25 1 26 27 28 i 100 200 400 600 SCALE: 1' 400' _ ?rm ` 9 a O \ " ? 29 32 LEGEND: m ----------------------- BLOCK NUMBER N --- t X eew-ises r . ;? r ` ?4y r? \ 13 2 C0 1234 LOT ADDRESS I ray '? ?", f e 0 I ----- CITY LIMITS LINE 723/03 ' 0T Se '? y`1 y ? SHADED AREA - PROPERTY =3 OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ? r ? 23/01 t ,E o aob '( ?16a !! 23 0 12 S1 '? 23/013 A. ? L U ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ?/ 13 7 c j ti??., al i sa/os d j\ _;? ?? p ?]; ? I 13/03 ? ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION A ttcwa t. ma, / f,Y• ? .?/ I? eetrsn7e - ZONE LINE ;sra ?/? > c /11 ros,a ef wo`s-iiiDOf 23/06 24/06 t 24/04 • ?y •/ 3/11 v r +P CY 13/05 01 511412/11/0l I life, l\ ry w ) e • ' I ? aeee-mm r ,ay.. Mee-+?N FDO, J. J.NUGGS : y-'---------- bnea 23/07 l 73/08 23/09 81-40 PARCEL I l vARQl 'B' i 'A" u PARCEL "C" PARCEL 'D' PARCEL 'E' j1WAK 24/02 I 13/07 p PLACE a R 4 1 1 3 8 0 za/ol ? j ? REVISED: e twer,ro .m.er> 03/08/99 GULF S TO BAY BLVD S S. R. 60 8 R 8-- S S ZONING ATLAS - y? NW 1/4 OF SECTION 299B V 300A 306-B A 17 - 29 s - 16 E 2 g 1 A U,S (743n'1 (?. NAR E1 '95 16:29 KING ENG ASSOC: INC P. 1/2 i Engineering ssoc&,u ' f rn ir 24945 U.9, Highway 19 A47rth * CM,,?r tef, F1,9rit1o X23 ® (813) 191-1441 w FAY, (593) 797-9228 Full-Setules Planning, Engineering Enviroart meal Consultants TRANSMISSION C""WER SHEET Date. 3-Z1 Time: iS Coin pang: 01- t-, 6 F .E pax: r .fie: Sender: -- IPo t-, YOU SHOULD RECEIVE PAGE Z- (S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IP YOU DO NTOT ItECF1 VE ALL TLi ' PAGES, PL&I SE CALL. Comments: 76 71? Original to Follow: 0Yes [ONO Job Number: FAX Completed by: Response. Not. Necessary O ? Needed within 24 hours G, 1 f° Needed I n-unediateiy 0 The infbmttion contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential inforrnauon intended only for the us- of the individual or entity minted above. If the rrader of this message is not the intended ,arpie-nt, or the employee or agent responsibir: to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby i oelr_d that any dissewLution, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have ;revived this eot=unication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the original mew ge to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. .Ser'Ving Florida Since 1977 MAP 21 '95 1 :2 9 I<'IHG ENG ArSO(- I?'di= P.2 2 J ` t?ttAr 5`'?J?Ccr1 ?-?'t j?''-,?'?'1 vr'7??v ... P 'r".'?.' i+ ?7 7i r/ {(? +f i7 fr ?? t( rr 1 .r ,I` rri i+% `?i f}t i i{, J 71 !1 FAX MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWATER DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL PERMITTING CITY HALL ANNEX 10 SO. MISSOURI AVE. P.O. BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL 34618 FAX PHONE - (813) 462-6476 OFFICE PHONE - (813) 462-6567 March 3, 1995 TO: FROM: FAX PHONE: MESSAGE: Robert Kelly, Technician Allen V. Mahan, Central Permitting Coordinator 791.-9228 i SLm - *?v pmx" pk?r ??/yg1GFCS Y City application for sub-division plat review attached per our telecon this date. TOTAL PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 3 Total No. of pages including cover page 951sb1x1.avm 0 i Item # C Clearwater City Commission Meeting Date: Agenda Cover Memorandum y aa,45 ?u SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Park Place Outparcels; located on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard on the east and west sides of Park Place Boulevard; Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. (owner); King Engineering Associates, Inc. (representative). (SUB 95-01) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Receive the Preliminary Plat for Park Place Outparcels and authorize the Development Review Committee to approve a final subdivision plat subject to the plat being recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any of the buildings. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The applicant has prepared a Preliminary Subdivision Plat creating five parcels of the Park Place development. This follows City Commission approval September 1, 1994 of the final site plan for the five parcels. That plan shows construction of three restaurants and a retail building on four separate lots with a stormwater retention pond on the fifth lot to serve the other four. Platting of the parcels will enable signage appropriate to the desired usage. The Final Site Plan approved last September addressed the site access issues by removing two driveway points of access directly onto Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The Unity of Title has been recorded as required and the cross-access agreements have been filed accordingly with the final site plan. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: S N/A Commission Action: Legal N/A CENTRAL PERMITTING Total C_ Approved l.r - O Budget N/A .5-5 O Approved w/conditions N/A Purchasin $ g O D i d Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. en e Cis N/A - " O Continued to: ENG Funding Source: ACM 13 Capital Imp. Other N/A Advertised: O Operating Attachments: Date: E3 Other APPLICATION Paper: LOCATION MAP i d ® N t R CC 9/19/94 AGENDA ITEM equ re o Sul mitted by: Affected Parties 13 Notified Appropriation Code: 13 None j 4?a : ® Not Required 9 r Ci 4 C.1 Printed on recycled paper Lr 1 T yr ?.icr?nvvti a cn - uepartmenz of riannrng & uevelopment City Hail Annex, 10 So. Missouri Ave., P.O. 8=,,4748 ° Clearwater. FL 34618-474$ 4 Telephone: t8 13) 462-6880 (Fax 462-6641) y AFTUCATION FORSUSD(V MN PLkT REYTLW LINCOLN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ACTING AS` Applicant (Owner of Record): AGENTS FOR CLART, INC. Phone:l 407 l 862-9990 Address: g yQ - BOX 916464 City: LONGWOOD State; FL rp; 32791 KING Representative: ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. ? :_( all l 791- 1441 Address: 24945 US HIGHWAY 19 NORTH CRY CLEARWATER State: FL 34623 Prepattr of Plat. EARL W. RAMER prol;o Tide: P . L . S . Address: 24945 US HIGHWAY 19 NORTH City: CLEARWATER State: FL Zip: 34623 Telephone: ( 813 791-1441 Trtfe of Proposed Subdivision Plat: PARK PLACE OUTPARCELS Parcel Number 17 / 29 / 16 j 00000 / 230 / 1000 AND 17/29/16/00000./240/0500 General Location of Property: GULF TO BAY BLVD AND PARK PLACE BLVD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Zoning: CG Land Use Plan Classification: GENERAL COMMERCIAL Existing Use of Property: VACANT Proposed Use of Property: COMMERCIAL/RESTAURANT C70 Ordinances No. 3128-83 and No. 3129-83 require a parrs and recreation impact fee to be paid for all nonresidential protect over i acre in size and all residential developments. Has This p?ppe?y complied with these ordinances? YES tf yes, explain hov "when: PAID AS A PART OF PARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT" Assessed just value of property (attach verification):-_ $1,717,800 Most recent sales price (attach verification): $1, 400 , 000 Dec. 20 , 1994 As of (date): Fee for Subdivision Plat Review. 1. Rase charge for each preliminary subdivision plat ................................ $890 plus (a) For each lot included on the plat .................... . .....................S30perbt 2. Revalidation of a certified preliminary subdivision plat ............................. $55 3. Subdivision plat arnendment (after certification prior to recording) ..................... SSS 4. AdrniniStrative lot division , , , , .........................................$150 Any request for a variance from the regulations set forth in Chapter 133 shall be submitted in writing to the ptarv*V b Developmert Department concurrently with the preliminary plat. Such written request stsail state fully the QrounQs for the variance request wu au facts reified upon by the petitioner. The aoPkant, by filing this application agrees he/she will comply with Chapter 133, the Subdivision and Condominium Piattirt Regulations, Of the City's Land Development Code. / SigrlatufCo\ i' ?lAr 'i??%'Ll/ i l L?iLG• (Owner of RecpfB)? 'K the aW-cation is signed by an individual other than the property owner (e.o. the representative), please attach a statemen signed by the property owner authorizing this individual to sign the application. REV. 2/9: 1999-259-000.433 1 t t 1 ? O r' ti o I \ cc: 00 t- r N s wow .mwa?-r----E 1 1 ?? }wrpYrl t I I 1 k g r?}ray r I SC YT r l_ ?'6are? ' 1 orr a).uve •oy- i 1 ? lam" c I a t • ,Jg 1 d 1 z 1 O O S ? tt 3 - "Y,r rDWir1 -•?- ?r OMY}19?1 M 'y.r }u0a wY, -j- aruwO.Y L' M} - '3" 33-'*n 1- )Yrl aloe - O t I Q t 1 p 1 o 1 c 0 1 0 6 7.c O 1 ? E ?{ _ y?r ar'rroYrn ? a ')+r OVIDO.. ell? i O W b MO1111tY R, 'AT 4 'oa r).OVS? i ? s C d 9 OY )M))} 1 .S 'Wo owe*o. 1 ,O I G } t- ? S S ytr, L. allT 'Y,t M.pTTS1 71Y OOO.aM11Y 7+r' h W w ?'? Nz? tl =,n 1 1 -? t w d• ? \ 1 ? g g b ? { G t I 22/02 0 U L_J ry 1 m 43-14s ? 131-13? ry m L140-142 -? 1 N I y ? - m v - '/03 - 0"4FD X01 23/013 CC S) 24/06 ?v w U 4 Y J. MUGGS ----- unuuuumm?uuuuunnn a a a " " "D" "Ell Parcel ??B - ?, - arcel 11C Parcel Parcel 1 Parce 23/10 e 31-40 24/05 O ? .z G "A?? ° 0 b h N ? 6665-17s e°a3-17? TO BAY BLVD GUL?7- 7o F3AY gE-Vb 3476-932 3370-e77 ] I I b N 31, 4 15t,61 LOT 3 Ci•. OA V O Qr ?.YO. ?V LOT 2 G 24/01 MU C uunu 10 h b S. R. 60 l 23/11 ?Zo 4S? 7t 4 q?3 E`er f ?TE0. Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: 3Y C)" SUBJECT: Final Site Plan for Park Place Outparcels; located on the north side of Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard on the east and west sides of Park Place Boulevard; Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. (owner); Timothy A. Johnson (representative) (PSP 94-15B) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the Final Site Plan for Park Place Outparcels subject to DRC conditions of approval listed on pages two and three. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: At its August 18, 1994 meeting, the Commission authorized the DRC to review the site plan for this development, with final approval being reserved for the City Commission. On August 30, 1994, the DRC reviewed the final site plan, and recommends Commission approval subject to the conditions listed on pages two and three. The applicant proposes to construct three separate restaurants and a retail building on four separate lots with associated parking and landscaping. One stormwater retention pond (parcel E) is proposed to serve the four restaurant/retail lots (Parcels A, B, C and D). The applicant desires to plat the property for signage purposes, and a Declaration of Unity of Title will be required prior to issuance of building permits. The subject outparcel properties are included in the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order. The proposed three restaurants and the retail building will front on Gulf-To- Bay Boulevard and will be required to file cross-access agreements for optimum internal traffic circulation. The applicant has revised the preliminary site plan by removing the two driveway points of access from Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard to serve the sites to be developed. Reviewed by: Originating Dept Costs: NIA rt. ion Action: C om Legal N/A CENTRAL PERMITTING Total ? / L Approved Budget N/A ? Approved w/conditions Purchasing N/A Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied cis N/A ? Continued to: ACM Fundin g Source: Other N/A ? Capital Imp . Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: ? Other APPLICATION Paper: MAP ® Not Required Submitted by: Affected Parties 11 Notified Appropriation Code: ? None Ci Ma ger ® Not Required 10Printed on recycled paper M King Engineering Associates, Inc. TO / 1?,4 t, 1n,41-?R y f OF ??t? ?t?F12W4-jzM c-tn jfCW? 17T'? Nl? ?_L? ,kit , FL. a 4b!8 24945 U.S. Hwy. 19 North Clearwater, Florida 34623 (813) 791-1441 • Fax: (813) 791-9228 Engineering, Planning, Surveying, Environmental Permitting L-11 /A couR..,t?-e WE ARE SENDING YOU EAttached ?Shop drawings ? Submittals ?Copy of letter ? Change order LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 3 Z7 Q S JOB NO. g- Z j - ATTENTI N r9- I- RE: A72-v_ LACC CZS ? Under separate cover via ? Plans ? Samples the following items: ? Specifications COPIES DATE SPECIFICATION REFERENCE DESCRIPTION I S 3 f Z7 g5 PA-AY_ PL-Rctr u P EL Pcf{T 7v L S t7Z Y?rtn? THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ? Approved as submitted ? For your use ? As requested For review and comment ? Approved as noted ? Returned for corrections REMARKS ? Resubmit copies for approval ? Submit copies for distribution ? Return corrected prints MAR27 ? Ch QW ER CI COPY TO Fix- SIGNED '?'?rtri t ?.a.?.?J 1 ? 1 94-350050 PINELLAS805NTpGF1768 8875 INST # OFF.REC.BK DEC 27, 1994 5:08PM .. DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE ,Or RECEIVED-MAR 2 0 19 Ul F.E nn-'?v REC -C ' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner(s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit: DS Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit "A." F; S P/C - REV TO-fA N-d 0 hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and . estrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid real property shall hereafter by regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an one building site. 2. That the aforesaid real property received Commercial Planned Development conceptual (zoning) plan approval from the City of Clearwater City Commission on August 30, 1994, 3. That the aforesaid real property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land with proposed development to be in accordance with the approved conceptual (zoning) plan. 4. That if the real property, or any portion thereof, is sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately, said conveyed or devised portions shall be developed in accordance with the approved conceptual (zoning) plan, in order that the aforesaid real property appears and operates as one building site. KENNETH F. OSWALD ?J SUITE 110, 600 COURTLAND STREET Qv ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32804 - _t PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 8875 PG 1769 5. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this l 3th day of December 19 94 WITNESSES: OWNER(S): CLANI', Inc. 2648 St. Rd. 434 #B Lon oo , YL 32779 Sign ure Print n e dT T yder R Johnson, President Print name Signature Print name y.r?'. ?i Notary Public -7- Print name: T / c(-c-,(P My Commission Expires: ooV ?!r, '....;;LANE J TACKM ?N My Commission OCR Expires Jul. 2S, its Bonded by M , i 800-422-1556 RETURN T KENNETH F. OSWALD ATTORNEY AT LAW AMERICAN PIONEER BUILDING SUITE 110 600 COURT LAND STREET ORLANDO, FLOR0A 2804 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF SEMINOLE PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 8875 PG 1770 BEFORE ME personally appeared L der R. Johnson, , to me known to be the President of CLANT, Inc. described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me the execution thereof to be his free act and deed for the uses and purpose herein mentioned. He is personally known to me. VTITNESS my hand and official seal this ? day of 1?ee ern Eie 19 ?. EXHIBIT A ?PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 8875 PG 1771 PARCEL I A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence S89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the centerline of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 660.00 feet; thence N 00°19'21"W, 60.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of said Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and the point of beginning, thence along said North right-of-way line, S89°46'01."W, 203.97 feet to the North right-of-way line of said Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County; thence along said North right-of-way line the following, N86°50'35"W, 279.11 feet; thence S89°46'01"W, 150.61 feet to the East right- of-way line of Park Place Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 192-196 of the Public Records of said County, thence along said East right-of-way line the following N42°08'20"W, 51.72 feet; thence N07°45'25"W, 267.30 feet; thence leaving said line S89038' 31"E, 484.61 feet; thence SOO° 13' 59"E, 34.98 feet; thence N89°46'01"E, 217.75 feet; thence S00°19'21"E, 280.02 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 4.644 acres more or less. PARCEL II A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf--to-Bay Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence S89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the centerline of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 1,882.78 feet; thence NOO°13'59"W, 60.03 feet to the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Hay Boulevard as recorded in official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-175 of the Public Records of said County and the point of beginning; thence, along said North right-of-way line, N87°17'49"E, 375.48 feet to the West right-of-way line of Park Place boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 192-196 of the Public Records of said County; thence along said West right-of-way line, N45°29'32"E, 48.58 feet to the West right-of-way line of said Park Place Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County; thence, along said West right-of-way line, N00°13'59"W, 229.66 feet; thence, leaving said line S89°46'01"W, 228.33 feet; thence N00°13'59"W, 10.00 feet; thence S89°46'01"W, 75.00 feet; thence S00°13'59"E, 90.00 feet; thence S89°46'01"W, 102.04 feet; thence S01°04'04"W, 199.81 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 2.348 acres more or less. CITY OF CLEARWATER - Department of Planning & Development City Hall Annex, 10 So. Missouri Ave., P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618-4748 Telephone: (813) 462-6880 (Fax 462-6641) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW Applicant (Owner of Record): Phone: ( ) Address: City: State: Zip Representative: Telephone: ( 1 Address: City: State: Zip: Preparer of Plat: Professional Title: Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: ) Title of Proposed Subdivision Plat: Parcel Number: General Location of Property: Zoning: Land Use Plan Classification: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: City Ordinances No. 3128-83 and No. 3129-83 require a parks and recreation impact fee to be paid for all nonresidential projects over 1 acre in size and all residential developments. Has this property complied with these ordinances? If yes, explain how and when: Assessed just value of property (attach verification): Most recent sales price (attach verification): As of (date): Fee for Subdivision Plat Review: 1. Base charge for each preliminary subdivision plat ................................ $890 plus (a) For each lot included on the plat ......................................... .$30 per lot 2. Revalidation of a certified preliminary subdivision plat ............................. $55 3. Subdivision plat amendment (after certification, prior to recording) ..................... $55 4. Administrative lot division ................................................ $150 Any request fora variance from the regulations set forth in Chapter 133 shall be submitted in writing to the Planning & Development Department concurrently with the preliminary plat. Such written request shall state fully the grounds for the variance request and all facts relied upon by the petitioner. The applicant, by filing this application agrees he/she will comply with Chapter 133, the Subdivision and Condominium Platting Regulations, of the City's Land Development Code. Signature*: (Owner of Record) *If the application is signed by an individual other than the property owner (e.g. the representative), please attach a statement signed by the property owner authorizing this individual to sign the application. REV. ?_/92 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE - Section 133.033 Submission Requirements (15 copies each) (b) Preliminary plat. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer, be drawn to a scale not smaller than one inch equals one hundred (100) feet, and shall include the following: 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded. 2. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, property owner (if other than the applicant), and person preparing the plat. 3. Identification clearly stating that the drawing is a preliminary plat. 4. Legal description of the property, U.S. Survey section, township and range lines. 5. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements. 6. Proposed street names. 7. Names (appropriately positioned) of adjoining plats. 8. Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimension and area of: a. The overall plat. b. Each lot. c. Street rights-of-way including radii of cul-de-sacs. d. Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose. 9. North arrow, scale and date. (c) Preliminary plat supplementary drawing. The preliminary plat supplementary drawing shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer, be drawn to the same scale as the preliminary plat, and shall include the following: 1. Title of the associated preliminary plat. 2. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, property owner (if other than the applicant), and person preparing the drawing. 3. Sanitary sewer, public water supply, storm water drainage, school, or other identifiable service or taxing districts. 4. Nearest arterial or collector roadway intersection. 5. Buildings, watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees and other existing features within the area to be platted and similar facts regarding existing conditions on land immediately adjacent thereto. 6. Inventory of existing natural resources and/or environmentally unique areas on the site,. 7. Existing sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, culverts, and other underground structures within the plat or immediately adjacent thereto, including the location and size of the nearest water and sewer lines. 8. Existing and proposed spot elevations. 9. Proposed use of each lot and existing and proposed zoning of all property within the plat. 10. Zoning district classification for adjoining property. 11. Location of common open space, parks and other public or semipublic areas or facilities within or immediately adjacent to the property to be platted. 12. Location and size of sanitary sewers or other sewage disposal facilities planned. 13. Land to be dedicated to the city including: a. Street right-of-way, by functional classification. b. Recreation land, recreation facilities and open space. c. Any other public use. 14. Preliminary site drainage system including: a. General surface drainage pattern, including proposed retention area. b. Floodplain definition and effect of applicable local, state or federal flood standards or elevations. (b) Preliminary plat. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer, be drawn to a scale not smaller than one inch equals one hundred (100) feet, and shall include the following: 1. Title under which the proposed plat is to be recorded. 2. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, property owner (if other than the applicant), and person preparing the plat. 3. Identification clearly stating that the drawing is a preliminary plat. 4. Legal description of the property, U.S. Survey section, township and range lines. 5. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements. 6. Proposed street names. 7. -Names (appropriately positioned) of adjoining plats. 8. - --Approximate (to the nearest foot) dimension and area of: a. The overall plat. b. Each lot. c. Street rights-of-way including radii of cul-de-sacs. d. Common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose. 9. North arrow, scale and date. (c) Preliminary plat supplementary drawing. The preliminary plat supplementary drawing shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer, be drawn to the same scale as the preliminary plat, and shall include the following: 1. Title of the associated preliminary plat. 2. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, property owner (if other than the applicant), and person preparing the drawing. 3. Sanitary sewer, public water supply, storm water drainage, school, or other identifiable service or taxing districts. 4. Nearest arterial or collector roadway intersection. 5. Buildings, watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees and other existing features within the area to be platted and similar facts regarding existing conditions on land immediately adjacent thereto. 6. Inventory of existing natural resources and/or environmentally unique areas on the site,. 7. Existing sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, culverts, and other underground structures within the plat or immediately adjacent thereto, including the location and size of the nearest water and sewer lines. 8. Existing and proposed spot elevations. 9. Proposed use of each lot and existing and proposed zoning of all property within the plat. 10. Zoning district classification for adjoining property. 11. Location of common open space, parks and other public or semipublic areas or facilities within or immediately adjacent to the property to be platted. 12. Location and size of sanitary sewers or other sewage disposal facilities planned. 13. Land to be dedicated to the city including: a. Street right-of-way, by functional classification. b. Recreation land, recreation facilities and open space. c. Any other public use. 14. Preliminary site drainage system including: a. General surface drainage pattern, including proposed retention area. b. Floodplain definition and effect of applicable local, state or federal flood standards or elevations. Q Olu King Engineering Associates, Inc. 24945 U. S. Highway 19 North • Clearwater. Florida 34623 • (813) 791-1441 • FAX (813) 791-9228 Full-Service Planning, Engineering & Environmental Consultants March 9, 1995 Mr. Allen U. Mahan City of Clearwater Central Permitting 10 South Missouri Avenue Clearwater, FL 34618 Re: Park Place Outparcels Plat Dear Allen: On behalf of Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc., we are submitting the application for plat review for the above referenced project. Please advise if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Robert Kelly Technician :es G:\62\MAHAN.3 cc: Jonathan J. Gotwald, P.E., KEA Lyder Johnson, Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. File 1999-259-000.433 Serving Florida Since 1977 7'r. 17G.C r. kt? CITY OF CLEARWATER - Department of Planning & Development City Hall Annex, 10 So. Missouri Ave., P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater. FL 2461&474a Telephonie: (813) 462-6880 (Fax 462-6641) ASP _r.6MN FOR 5V8DtV1Sl10N PLM aFVrF E LINCOLN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ACTING AS Applicant (O vrw of Record): ___ AGENTS FOR CLA_RT. INC. Phone: ( 407 ) 862- Addre=: .0_„_BOX 916464 _City:- _LONGWOOD State• F=Zp•_ Representative- KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Telephone: f 813 ) 791„„ Address: 24945 US HIGHWAY 19 NORTH City- CLEARWATER State- FL Preparer of PIaC , EARL W . RAMER Professional Trtle:__ P . L . S . 0 2791 34623 Address: 24945 US HIGHWAY 19 NORTH: CLEARWATER State; FL 34623 Telephone:( 813 a 791-1441 TRfe of Proposed Subdivision Plat PARK PLACE OUTPARCELS Parfet Nurnber. 17 / 29 1_16 / 00000 / 230 / 1000 AND 17/29/16/000001240/0500 General Location of Property: GULF TO BAY BLVD AND PARK PLACE BLVD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Zoning: CG Land Use Plan Classification: GENERAL COMMERCIAL Existing Use of Property: VACANT Proposed Use of Property COMMERCIAL/RESTAURANT City Ordinances No. 3 t 28-83 and No. 3129-83 requires parks and recreation impact fee to be paid for all nonresidential pried( over i acne in size and all residential developments. Has is pp?tpppp complied with these Ordinances? YES K yes, explain how "when: PAID AS A PART OF PARK PLACE DEVthELOPME9 Assessed just value of property (attach verification): $1,717,800 Most recent Sales price (attach verification): $1,400,000 As of (date): Dec. 20, 1994 Fee for Subdivision Plat Review: 1. gave charge for each preliminary subdiwisi plat (a) For each lot included on the plat ................................ $890 coos ..........................................$30 per tat 2. Revalidation of a certified preliminary subdivision plat ............................. $55 3. Subdivision plat amendment (after certification, prior to recording) ..................... 955 4. Administrative lot division ................................................. $ ISO Any request for a variance from the regulations set forth in Chapter 133 shall be subrnkted in writing to the Planning & Development Department concurrently with the preliminary plat. Such written request shall state fully the grounds for tine variance request and all facts relied upon by the petitioner. The applicant, by filing this aoogcation agrees he/she will comply with Chapter 133, the Subdivision and Condominium Platting ROQU1 0M, Of the City's Land Development Code. Signature 'ff the application is signed by an individual other thL the property owner (e.Q. the representative), please attach a statement signed by the property owner authorizing this individual to sign the application. REV . 292 1999-259-000.433 MAR- 7- 9 5 -r U E 1 6 2 2 L I N C O L N oln Ktnmerdal ?pertie4 eYna P.O. Box 916464 Longwood, Florida 32791 March 7, 1995 Mr. John Gofiwald Ping Engineering Associates, Inc. 24945 U.S. Highway 19 North Clearwater, FL 34623 Dear Mr. Gotwald: P - 0 2 (407) 862.9990 FAX (407) 862-2899 'T'his letter serves as authorization for you to represent CLAN'T, Inc. interests on behalf of the application for the platting process for the Park Place Outparcel Development. You have our permission and authorization to sign the above . mentioned application with the City of Clearwater. Since , Lyder Johnson President CL ANT, Inc. President Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. LRJ/djt Subscribed and sworn to this day of ??Lr ?'?? 1 g95, '16 -e-- e'll - Notary Public MY 0AALENE J TACKETT My commuslon CGS ExpMw Jul. 24, IM Bonded by MM :.:? Ir 800-422-IBM rlAR - Ri -SM 5 TUE 1 6 : 2:2 L I "COL- N CLOSING STATEMENT December 20, 1994 SELLER: PNC REALTY HOLDING CORP. OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation BUYER: CLANT, INC., a Florida corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. CREDIT SELLER Sales Prase: $1,400,000.00 Deposit (Paid to Seller): Prorate 1994 Pinellas County Real Property Taxes, 12 days at $104.67/day: 1,256.04 Cash at Closing: $1,01,25604 EXPENSES CHARGE SELLER Documentary Stamps on Deed: $ Record Deed: Record Declaration of Unity of Title: Record Short Form Leases (3): First American Title Ins. Co.: Title Report: Title Insurance Premium: Wyatt Real Estate Services, Inc. Real Estate Commission: 57,000.00 Kenneth F. Oswald W Attorneys Fees:, $ 57,000.00 P . 0 :S CREDIT BUYER $ 50,000.00 1,351,256.04 $1,401,256.04 CHARGE BUYER S 9,800.00 33.00 19.50 49.50 200.00 6,275.00 6,125.00 $ 22,502.00 REMARKS 1. The 7.994 Pinellas County Real Property Taxes have been prorated based on the actual 1994 Pinellas County Tax Bills. 2. Recapitulation: Seller Buyer Cash at Closing: $1,351,256.04 Cash at Closing: $1,351,256.04 Less Seller's Plus Suyer's Expenses: 57,000.00 Expenses: 22,j0 2.00 Cash Due Seller: $1,294,256.04 Net Cash Due from Buyer: $1,373,758.04 EXHIBIT "A-1" PHASE Y A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas county, Florida, and being mors'particularly described as follows; Commence at the center of said Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf-to-say Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence South 89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the conterline of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, for 2037.78 feet to the Southeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to Frank Fields by Warranty Deed recorded in Dood Book 41, page 133, Pinellas County Records; thence North 00°13'59"W, for 60.00 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line of SR55 (as described in Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3570, Page 873, Pinellas County Records; designated as parcel 110, section 15150-2512); thence North 01°04'04"E along the East line of said parcel described in Deed Book 41, Page 133, Pinellas County Records, for 289.86 feet, to the point of beginning: thence continue North 01°04'04"E, for 310.13 feet to the Northeast corner of said parcel; thence South 89°46'01"W along the North boundary line of said parcel and along the North boundary line of that certain parcel conveyed to Francis Fields by Warranty Deed recorded in need Book "Il", Page 177, Hillsborough County Records for 198.43 feet to the Southeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to H. Perrin Anderson, et al, by Warranty Deed recorded in O.R. Book 2848, Page 504, Pinellas County Records; thence North 00052121"E along the East boundary of said parcel, for 134.00 feet; thence North 89°46'01" East, for 245.99 feet; thence North 45°00'00"E, for 318.43 feet; thence South 45°00'00"E, for 326.01 feet; thence South 64°32'56"E, for 207.52 feet to the point of intersection with a curve concave to the Northwest; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 1510.00, a central angle of 02°04'29", an arc length of 54.68 feet, and a chord bearing North 40°25'46"E for 54.68 feet; thence South 45°47'20"E, for 82.07 feet to the point of intersection with a curve concave to the Northwest; thence Northeasterly along the are of said curve, having a radius of 2000.00 feet, a central angle of 13°40'48", an arc length of 477.52 feet, and a chord bearing North 37°22'16"x:, for 476.38 feet to the point of tangency; thence South 57°38'27"E, for 195.80 feet; thence South 32°21'33"W, for 60.00 feet; thence South 30°13'59"E, for 329.71 feet; thence South 29°46'01"W, for 63.90 feet; thence South 00°19'21"E, for 31.35 feet; thence North 89°40'39"E, for 145.54 feet; thence South 00°19'21"E, for 181.62 feet; thence North 89°40'39"E, for 25.82 feet; thence North 87°39'10"E, for 222.06 feet; thence North 30°01'50"E, for 502.08 feet to a point on the West line of Hampton Road; thence South 00°19'21"E along said West line, for 460.32 feet to a point on the North boundary line of that certain parcel conveyed to Hugh S. McMullen by Warranty Deed recorded in Deed Book'l102, Page 529, Pinellas County Records; thence South 89°46'01"W along said line and along the North boundary of that certain parcel conveyed to Henry L. McMullen Warranty Deed recorded in Deed Book 1110, Page 419, Pinellas County Records for 627.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said parcel described in Deed Book 1110, Pago 419, Pinellas County Records; thence North 00°19'21"W, for 10.00 feet; thence South 89°46'01"W, for 217.75 feet; thence North 00°13'59"W for 34.98 feet; thence North 89°38'31"W for 484.61 feet; thence South 07°45'25"E for 267.30 feet; thence South 42°08'20"E, for 52.40 feet; thence South 84°08'40"E, for 150.85 feet to a point on the Northerly right,-of- way line of SR 55 (as described in Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3570, Page 873, Pinellas County Records designated as Parcel, 110, Section 15150-2512); thence South 89° 46' 01 "W along said right-of-way line, for 618.43 feet; thence North 86°09'16"E, for 253.94 feet; thence North 45°29'32"E, for 55.87 feet; thence North 00°13'59"W, for 224.79 feet; thence South 89°46'01"W, for 233.33 feet; thence North 00°13'59"W, for 10.00 feet; thence South 89°46'01"W, for 330.00'feet to the point of beginning. 1995-n;q-07 17:q,9 PAGE = nn 3. Receipts & Disbursements: A. Receipts: Cash due from Buyer: $1,373,758.04 $1,373,758.04 B. Disbursements: (1) Pinellas County Clerk w (a) Record Deed: $ (b) Record Declaration: (o) Record Short Form Teases: (2) First American Title Ins. Co.: (3) Fidelity Title & Guaranty Co.: (4) Wyatt Real Estate Services, Inc.: (5) Kenneth F. Oswald: (6) PNC Realty Holding Corp. 9,833.00 19.50 49.50 6,275.00 200.00 57,000.00 6,125.00 of Florida, Inc.: 1,294,256.01 $1,373,758.04 Accepted and approved by Seller this day of December, 1994. PNC REALTY HOLDING CORP. OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation Accepted and approved by Buyer this // day of December, 1994. CLANT, XNC., a Florida corporation rti A By. By:? ?(. Ly r Fi , JO P resident . EXH1BXT "A" PARCEL I A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence S89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the centerline of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 660.00 feet; thence N 00°19'21"W, 60.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of said Gulf-to-Day Boulevard and the point of beginning, thence along said North right-of-way line, S89°46'01"W, 203.97 feet to the North right-of-way line of said Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County; thence along said North right-of-way line the following, N86°50'35"W, 279.11 feet; thence S89°46'01"W, 150.61 feet to the East right- of-way line of Park Place Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 192-196 of the Public Records of said County, thence along said East right-of-way line the following N42°08'20"W, 51.72 foot; thence N07°45'25"W, 267.30 feet; thence leaving said line S89°38'31"E, 484.61 feet; thenco S00°13'59"E, 34.98 feet; thence N89°46'01"E, 217.75 feet; thence S00°19'21"C, 280.02 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 4.644 acres more or less. PARCEL 1:1r A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence S89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the centerline of Gulf'-to-Bay Boulevard 1,882.78 feet; thence N0001315911W,'60.03 feet to the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Say Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County and the point of beginning; thence, along said North right-of-way line, N87°17'49"C, 375.48 feet to the West right-of-way line of Park Place boulevard as recorded in official Records Book 6663, Pages 192-1'96 of the Public Records of said County., thence along said West right-of-way line, N45°29'32"E, 48.58 feet to the West right-of-way line of said Park Place Boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County; thence, along said West,right-of-way line, NO0°13'59"W, 229.66 feet; thence, leaving said line S89°46'01."W, 228.33 Poet; thence NO0°13'59"W, 10.00 feet; thence S89°46'01"W, 75.00 feet; thence S00°1.3'59"E, 90.00 feet; thence S89°46'01"W, 102.04 feet; thence S01°04'04"W, 199.81 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 2.348 acres more or less. Together with and subject to the easement rights, benefitting the Insured Property as follows: (1) Access, parking, construction, drainage and utility easement, given pursuant to the following: Over and across that certain property described on the attached Exhibit "A-1" granted pursuant to Casement and Restrictive Covenant Agreement dated April 25, 19850, recorded in Official Records Book 5973, Page 2110, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.. hhh, "01 23/013 CC to U a 24/06 LOT 2 I Y LCI - ------------- J. MUGGS n „„ „ „ „ '1- 40 Parcel B ? - Parcel D Parcel E 23/10 Parce 24/Gi 24/05 (IG o „A„ e ` ? y b N 6663-175 5 eee?-»? `v 0 70 BAY BLVD S. R. 60 0 GUL? `To gA?r f3E.b 3 76-5?2 3570-677 7 3?4ISI6 7 8 Fe ?zo ? 23/11 "ncoln ) om.mercial elropertiesy 4(nd. P.O. Box 916464 Longwood, Florida 32791 'January 17, 1995 i VIA: FACSIMILE, ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW i Richard Baeir, City Engineer City of Clearwater PO. 4748 Clear later, F11- "14618-4748 JAN '2 0199fi D RE: PROPOSED CHANGES PARK PLACE DRI Dear Mr. Baeir: (40)8`0-9990 FAX (407) 862-2899 KENT Mr:.ERING GROUP ? TCJ ? PJ ? R/W ? JRL ? %m ? ? ? RJ10 ? RRP O DDNI ? APB a wJs ? CH C! CRF ? AE ? RDB ? GLB ? N-1B ? IMP ? RCS ? JVYR ? GAJ ? JP COPIES T0: - FILE: As per our conversation this. morning, it is my understanding from you that as a part of the conditions under the proposed changes to the DRI that the access issue to Gulf to Bay has been deleted as a condition. It is obvious that this condition would have a substantial impact on our property and any future development plans, more so than; any other. of the requested changes to the DRI. Even though we are not in possession . of the documentation regarding the access, or any other requested changes, we have been assured by Tim Johnson that all other changes to the ' DRI have no impact, whatsoever, on our property. If you are not of the same opinion as Tim Johnson, please advise us accordingly. As we spoke in the past Richard, we are in the process of relocating the retention on the far easterly proportion of our property, and therefor would need additional access from Gulf to Bay. In addition, as mentioned previously, we are doing a feasibility of the acquisition of the McMullen property adjacent to our easterly property line and in that event additional traffic circulation considerations would have to be considered. As I indicated to you and Mr. Lou Hilton, our willingness to cooperate fully with the City of Clearwater in reasonable matters as it would benefit both us, the City and community members of Clearwater. Our intentions as developers and property ; owners within the city is to have a development in which the community would find appeasing, as well as providing services in which the community can enjoy for years to come. to working with you in the near future. LydeiVR. Johnson, President Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. cc: Tim Johnson; Johnson, Blakely, Pope i I King Engineering Associates, Inc. TO ?U11 AL 1777 4d C_ / 7y OF Litt-7eWA? ?t/uT tL_ Pe-PK&L-rT 101 10 sor,;-t+ Misscu2i A?E C'L IE--w.e,,.r&, -t iq_ . 3 4Gl8 24945 U.S. Hwy. 19 North Clearwater, Florida 34623 (813) 791-1441 • Fax: (813) 791-9228 Engineering, Planning, Surveying, Environmental Permitting U. A- - C? mat tZ ?A, L WE ARE SENDING YOU ? Attached ?Shop drawings ?Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 1-7-7 5 JOB NO. 9'z?S ' 3 ATTENTION &)R L / 22q'W' j RE: (? V 14? "P,Ac(: S;0, tZ.S 4347 ? Under separate cover via the following items: ? Submittals ? Plans ?Samples ?Specifications ? Change order c oNc/ qf ?? • jz/ of 7-7rLe- COPIES DATE SPECIFICATION REFERENCE DESCRIPTION 3-1°? qS ?o 0'r (Jn, 1T-'C THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ? For approval ? For your use ?K As requested ? For review and comment ? Approved as submitted ? Approved as noted ? Returned for corrections ? Resubmit copies for approval ? Submit copies for distribution ? Return corrected prints REMARKS tl#L, Lm ?TiL? ?D, ?•?G dr? Tl CrC!}ss .4ccc?S ff6 -x?cTr7$ A-n! j) ccl «? ?i9?/F ?t732 i ? ?o c? t(?f 7'? ? ?oti1Ht ?-?T5 ?Q (L?Se? Fro G COPY TO SIGNED MAR 211995 CENTRAL. PERMITTING r+a-rv ns; N FARWATER rc.i•rrJ FLA. INST # 94-350050 p9E?-BK 8875NTPG 1768 DEC 27r 1994 5:08PM OFF. 1 K;* nDl?ti Vi'ry. - ?ic --.?, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner(s) of the following described real property sittiated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit: Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit "A." - AL 7 .01 do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and . estrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNI'T'Y OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid real property shall hereafter by regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an one building site. 2. That the aforesaid real property received Commercial Planned Development conceptual (zoning) plan approval from the City of Clearwater City Commission on A 9„ 3. That the aforesaid real property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land with proposed development to be in accordance with the approved conceptual (zoning) plan. 4. That if the real property, or any portion thereof, is sold, assigned. transferred, conveyed or devised separately, said conveyed or devised portions shall be developed in accordance with the approved conceptual (zoning) plan, in order that the aforesaid real property appears and operates as one building site. y,AZO 4 KENNzTH F. OSwAm AvJ SUITE 110, 600 COURTI.ANO STREET `C' ORLANDO. FLORMA 32604 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 8875 PG 1769 5. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this ...-1at'h__.__ day of -December 19 JOA. . WITNESSES: OWNER(S): CLANT, Inc. 2648 St. Rd. 434 #B A Lon oo , TL 32779 Sign ure Print n Vine Signature 4711, , Print name Lyder-R Johnsoa,Bmsidraot Print name " ??nFE?r f.? L''XFi1M?'? "A'" PINELLAS COUNTY FICA. OFF.REC.BK 8875 PG 1771 PARCEL I A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Comence at the center of Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence S89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the centerline of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 660.00 feet; thence N 00°19'21"W, 60.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of said Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and the point of beginning, thence along said North right-of-way line, S89°46'01"W, 203.97 feet to the North right-of-way line of said Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard as recorded in official Records Book 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County; thence along said North right-of-way lino the following, N86°50'35"W, 279.11 feet; thence S89646' 01"W, 150.61 feet to the East right- of-way line of Park Place Boulevard as recorded in official Records Book 6663, Pages 192-196 of the Public Records of said County, thence along said East right-of-way line the following N42°08'20"W, 51.72 feet: thence N07°45'25"W, 267.30 feet; thence leaving said line S89°38'31"E, 484.61 feet; thence S00°13'59"E, 34,98 feet; thence N69°46'01"E, 217.75 feet; thence S00'19121"E, 280.02 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 4.644 acres more or less. PARCEL Il A tract of land lying within the Northwest 1/4 of section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, also being the point of intersection of the centerlines of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (SR 60) and Hampton Road (CR 144); thence S89°46'01"W along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 and the centerline of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 1,882,78 feet; thence N00'13159"W, 60.03 feet to the North right--of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard as recorded in Officia? Records Book 6663,. Pages 275-179 of the public Records of said County and the point of beginning; thence, along said North right-of-way line, N87'17'49"E, 375.48 felt to the West right-of-way line of Park Place boulevard as recorded in Official Records Book 6663, Pages 192-196 of the Public Records of said County; thence along said West right-of-way line, N45029'32"E, 48.58 feet to the West right-of-way line of said Park Place Boulevard as recorded in Official Records gook 6663, Pages 175-179 of the Public Records of said County; thence, along said west right-of-way line, N00°13'59"W, 229.66 feet; thence, leaving said line 889 46101"W, 228.33 feet; thence N00°13'59"W, 10.00 feet; thence S89'46101"W, 75.00 feet; thence S00°13'59"E,. 90.00 feet; thence 589'46'01"W, 102.04 feet; thence S01'04104"W, 199.81 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 2.348 acres more or less. "NELLAS COUNTY FLA. STATE OF FLORIDA OFF.REC.BK 8878 PG 7770 IRIDFLORIDA ) COUNTY OF SEMINOLE ) BEFORE ME personally appeared LY-det R JohnsQn, to me known to be the President of CLANT, Inc. described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me the execution thereof to be his free act and deed for the uses and purpose herein mentioned. He is personally known to me. WITNESS my hand and official seal this ` day of 19 Notary Pub c Print name: To, ?f My Commission Expires: r r _,. ALkNE1 J TA CKM ney Conr+r..bn 0?1? fvkel A$. 28, 100 Hondsid by NM ?I5"• UTURN T! KENNETH - F. OSWALD ATTORNEY AT LAW AMERICAN PIONEER BUILDING SUITE 110 600 COURTLAND STREET ORLANDO, FLOR!DA 22804 I tem # Clearwater City Commission Meeting Date: _ Agenda Cover Memorandum ArE SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Park Place Outparcels; located on the north side of Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard on the east and west sides of Park Place Boulevard; Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. (owner); Lyder Johnson (representative) (SUB 95-01) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Receive the Preliminary Plat for Park. Place Outparcels and authorize the Development Review Committee to approve a final subdivision plat subject to the plat being recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for any of the buildings. BACKGROUND: The applicant has prepared a Preliminary Subdivision Plat creating five parcels of the Park Place development. This follows City Commission approval September 1, 1994 of the final site plan for the five parcels. That plan shows construction of three restaurants and a retail building on four separate lots with a stormwater retention pond on the fifth lot to serve the other four. Platting of the parcels will enable signage appropriate to the desired usage. The Final Site plan approved last September addressed the site access issues by removing two driveway points of access directly onto Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The Unity of Title has been recorded as required and the cross-access agreements have been filed accordingly with the final site plan. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: N/A Commission Action: Legal N A CENTRAL PERMITTING Tota ? Approved Budget Purchasing N/A 11 Approved w/conditions Risk Mgmt. CIS User Dept: Curren Fiscal r. ? Denied ENG Funding Source: ? Continued to: ACM Oth ? Capital Imp. er N/A Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: ? Other 1. Application Paper: 2. Loction Map X N t R i d 3 CC 9 19 94 A e da It o equ re . . - - g n em Submitted by: Affected Parties Notified Appropriation Code: ? None City Manager X Not Required 10 Printed on recycled paper Item t * o Clearwater City Commission Meeting Date: Q ' oQ Agenda Cover Memorandum ?ATE0.E? 3Y C SUBJECT: Final Site Plan for Park Place Outparcels; located on the north side of Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard on the east and west sides of Park Place Boulevard; Lincoln Commercial Properties, Inc. (owner); Timothy A. Johnson (representative) (PSP 94-15B) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the Final Site Plan for Park Place Outparcels subject to DRC conditions of approval listed on pages two and three. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: At its August 18, 1994 meeting, the Commission authorized the DRC to review the site plan for this development, with final approval being reserved for the City Commission. On August 30, 1994, the DRC reviewed the final site plan, and recommends Commission approval subject to the conditions listed on pages two and three. The applicant proposes to construct three separate restaurants and a retail building on four separate lots with associated parking and landscaping. One stormwater retention pond (parcel E) is proposed to serve the four restaurant/retail lots (Parcels A, B, C and D). The applicant desires to plat the property for signage purposes, and a Declaration of Unity of Title will be required prior to issuance of building permits. The subject outparcel properties are included in the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order. The proposed three restaurants and the retail building will front on Gulf-To- Bay Boulevard and will be required to file cross-access agreements for optimum internal traffic circulation. The applicant has revised the preliminary site plan by removing the two driveway points of access from Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard to serve the sites to be developed. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: I NIA Com sion Action: Legal N/A CENTRAL PERMITTING Total CrsApproved Budget N/A / ? Approved w/conditions Purchasing N/A S ? D ied Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept Current Fiscal Yr. en Cis N/A ? Continued to: ACM Fundin g Source: Other N/A ? ital Imp Ca . p Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: ? Other APPLICATION Paper: MAP 13 Not Required Submitted by: Affected Parties t ? Notified Appropriation Code: ? None ® Not Required Ci Ma ager ?s.? Printed on recycled paper CITY OF CLEARWATER - Department of Planning & Development City Mail Annex, 10 So. Missouri Avt.. P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 346184748 'Telep?: (813) 462-6880 (Fox 462-6641) APPLICATION FOR 5VBDMSION PLAT BZaMN LINCOLN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ACTING AS 'Applicant JCwner of Record): AGENTS-FOR CLART, INC. Phone: I _ 407 l 862-9990 -.- Address: P, 0 ?, BOX 916464 City: LONGWOOD State: FL ZiF: 327 91 KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. ';Representative: Teiephona:___i 813 1 221-1441 = Address: 24945 US .HIGHWAY 19 NORTH City CLEARWATER State. FL ?Zip._34623 Preparer of Plan EARL W. RAMER Professional TsUe: P . L . S . Address: 24945 US HIGHWAY 19 NORTH CLEARWATER FL State: T.tp:_ 34623 Telephone: _ ( 813 l 7 91-1441 Trtte of Proposed Subdivision Plan PARK PLACE OUTPARCELS Parcel Number 17 / 29 / 16 / 00000 / 230 / 1000 AND 17/29/16/00000./240/0500 General Location of Property: GULF TO BAY BLVD AND PARK PLACE BLVD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Zoning: CG Land Use Plan Ctassif>cation: GENERAL COMMERCIAL Fxistinq Use of property: VACANT Proposed Use of Property: COMMERCIAL/RESTAURANT City Ckdir ances No. 3128-83 and No. 3129-83 require a parks and recreation impact fee to be paid for all nonresidemial projects over i acre in size and all residential developments. Etas this p?o?er?y complied with these ordinances? YES tf yes, explain how and when: PAID AS A PART OF PARK PLACE DEVELOYMI::N'1'" Assessed just value of property (attach verification):-- $1,717,800 Most recent sales price tattacti verification): $1, 400, 000 As of (date): Dec. 20, 1994 Fee for Subdivision Ptat Review: 1. Base charge for each preliminary subdivision prat ................................ 5890 plus (a) For each lot included on the plat .................. ......................$30 per lot 2. Revalidation of a certified pre3imirtiary subdivision ptat ............. . ...............555 3. Subdivision plat amendment tatter certificatim prior to recording) . , , , , , , , , . ... , ... S55 4. Administrative lot division ................................................ 5150 Any request for a variance from the reputations set forth in Chapter 133 shalt be submitted in wrifM to tt-,e p%anning & Development Department concurrently with the preliminary plat. Such written request Shan state fully the prounCtS for the variance request attd .4 facts relied upon by the petitioner. The aopiicant, by Bing this application agrees he/she will comply with Chapter 133, the Subdivision and Condominium PlattiN RegulStiortis, of the City's Land Development Code. i Signaturt:?, i'?L,u??-f ?,'Iy-fK/. 1 'r,?L,?.L• tOwner of AecofdJ/ 'tf the application is signed by an individual other than the property owner {e-q. the representative), please attach a statement signed by the property owner authorizing this individual to sign the application. REV. 2/92 1999-259-000.433 a ER 0 0 zz_. 1 a - I ? t-? MY I ?? }rr r.O 1 I I 1 'a / ? S I I 1 c ? S t ' t? T•n 'OV r),rjVe a L 'r> wow •, ? °v ? Tros •--? 1 c I `x x \ J ? TC YS =g2,' ? ? J? I -. I <1 i 'Or r)K7ni - fl M 5 LL 1 a ? 0 I 1 ? o 1 a I ° 1 t 2___x_ o, _1 0 t 1 ? . ;,o I f / C 1 I ?. 1 ? 1 Ot ?'KArt •? y w q ?.?.,.?)Yo) ow ?? -'W I -'y,Y S71N rJ•• OwYI+},? S7Nk att)c O x " i>r o • J ` •y.r AY•T?O•?„? t 1 I? R' t-CM R11fP I I 1 i bvp1 I I I 1 NOIIwrw I . I ti Z•n I Y I ? I 'OV Y)?pl)e 1 I I d I ? ? 1 0 0 e ? •oY• )w7). t?--r-- 1 s = U ro )rY1 ? I y,Y ? OwVMOM s 9 T y,r, ?- all Tr 'y,Y w.wST,n I •NY n 4Aw v 0 Ll \ d p 1 .P' g t^ cac ? ? n G 1 . 1 ? . 1 '01 J. MUGGS ?1-40 1 Par O All b b N 0 70 23/013 CC 0v w {U J a 24/06 L07 2 Y - -------------- -------- < a Parcel "B" - arcel "C" Parcel "D" Parcel "E" 23/10 24/05 .z G O U I I 000.)-175 666-175 BAY BLVD GULF- -to gAY SD 3476-932 3570-077 N b N 314 24/01 winiii S. R. 60 b b +zo l 23/11 `Mihyteordeparfanent CLEARWATER Correspondence a," C 14 1994 TO: Cyndie Goudeau, City Cleric CITY CLERK DEPT FROM: Scott Shuford, Development Code Administrator/Central Permitting Director SUBJECT: Simple Adjustment to the Certified Site Plan for Park Place Outparcels (PSP 94-15) COPIES: See List Below DATE: December 13, 1994 The applicant has submitted a request for a Simple Adjustment for the site plan last certified on November 17, 1994, and approved by the DRC on August 30, 1994. The changes to the final site plan include: 1) The Parcel C building footprint for Ruby Tuesday Restaurant was revised. Changes to the building layout include shifting the main entrance to the southeast corner of the Building and moving the mechanical room from the northeast corner to the northwest comer of the footprint. 2) The loading zone was relocated to access the service entrance at the northeast corner of the restaurant. 3) The handicap parking and ramping was realigned in front of the restaurant to accommodate the revised entrance. 4) Parking stalls immediately west of the building were modified and shifted north. A net loss of one parking space resulted with an additional space moved to directly in front of the building. 5) A ramp was added to service the west side of the restaurant for emergency egress. Conditions of approval are as follows: 1. Signs and fencing/walls are subject to separate review and permitting processes. 2. The requisite building permits must be procured within one (1) year from the date of certification of the final site plan and all requisite certificates of occupancy must be obtained within three (3) years of the date of certification of the site plan. 3. The related final plat shall be recorded within one (1) year from the certification date of the preliminary plat -or prior to issuance of.a certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first. 4. The dates and conditions for approval by the Planning and Zoning Board for conditional use approval and the Development Code Adjustment Board for variance approval shall be provided on the preliminary plat/site plan prior to certification. 5. A Unity of Title shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The location of the water meter should be at the edge of the right-of-way line, and the backflow preventor on private property directly adjacent to the right-of-way line, and each building will have a separate. meter. 7. Identify dumpster pad locations, and recommendations to be made by the City to save some trees at these locations. Each restaurant is to have its own dumpster. 8. The stormwater discharge is to be sized for predevelopment conditions for the portion of the site that flows there naturally. 9. Prior to issuance of a.building permit, a landscape plan shall be submitted to Environmental Management. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a clearing and grubbing permit and a tree removal permit (or a no tree verification form) are required. 11. Prior to certification, a copy of the SWFWMD permit application and calculations shall be provided to Environmental' Management. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit shall be submitted to Environmental Management. As conditions #4, 6, 7; 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 have been met, please certify the attached plans subject to conditions #1, 2, 3, and 5 listed above and distribute. This amendment to the certified site plan is approved as a Simple Adjustment to the site plan for the Park Place Outparcels last certified on November 17, 1994. Please certify the attached plans and distribute to those listed below. . SS/LRH/lrh Cyndie Goudeau December 13, 1994 Page two cc: Scott Shuford, Central Permitting Director Bob Maran, Central Permitting Jim Lewin, Gas Department Tom Miller, Environmental Ream Wilson, Parks & Recreation Director Don Meerians, Traffic Engineer Victor Chodora, Building Official Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk Steve Doherty, Zoning Section Supervisor Developer/Project Sponsor (3) Mr. Michael Steinback King Engineering Associates, Inc. 24945 U.S. Hwy. 19 North Clearwater, Florida 34623 9sp9413.cer DEC 16 MIMNG ?---? -- HATER PARK PLACE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR PARK PLACE LAND LIMITED PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. SEPTEMBER 2000 FDC PROJECT # 172-07 PARK PLACE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Intersections B. Roadway Links III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS IV. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation B. Trip Distribution C. Delineation of Study Area D. Capacity Analysis VI. CONCLUSIONS Appendix A: HCS Intersection Analysis Existing Conditions Appendix B: FDOT ART-TAB Capacity Tables Appendix C: HCS Intersection Analysis Future Conditions Appendix D: Miscellaneous Information List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Project Trip Distribution I. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard immediately east of U.S. 19 (See Figure 1). Park Place (DRI # 92) was originally approved in 1983, to have a build-out in 1991 and contain 150,000 s.f. of retail commercial space and 1,103,000 s.f. of office space. The development order was amended in 1994 and 1996 by two Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) to extend the build-out to 2000 and contain the following uses: Retail: Office: Lt. Industrial: 150,000 s.f.* 795,520 s.f.* 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office on parcel 4. The following development presently exists: Retail: Office: Lt. Industrial Apartment 81,120 s.f. 222,460 s.f. 100,000 s.f 390 d.u. The project is now being considered for a modification that would reduce the amount of approved office and retail space, extend the build-out date to December 31, 2003, and develop trade-off mechanisms for Parcel 6 to potentially convert office space to multi-family units or hotel rooms. This analysis will compare the transportation impacts of the approved development plan and those of the proposed development program. Specifically, three tests will be evaluated to determine the overall traffic impact reduction brought about by the revised development proposal and the revised build-out year. A comparison of external trip generation. 2. A determination of whether traffic from the revised project plus background growth projected through 2003 will exceed that which was projected in the original ADA. 3. A determination of whether total traffic in the revised build-out year will result in roadway improvements that differ from those identified in the current Development Order. A transportation methodology was agreed to at a methodology meeting held at the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council on August 9, 2000. Letters of correspondence are included in Appendix D. DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROJECT No. 172-Q7 DATE: FIGURE: I FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9/00 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater !FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC "Z II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were established by conducting traffic counts in July/August 2000. These included intersection turning movement counts and roadway segment counts. All traffic counts were converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. In addition, intersection geometrics and signal timings were obtained in the field and signal system timings were also obtained from the maintaining governmental agency. A. Intersections Using the peak hour/peak season volumes and the recorded geometrics, intersection capacity analyses were performed at each of the intersections using the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures. As requested by TBRPC, a 2% heavy truck factor was used in signal analysis. The Highway Capacity Software (HCS) capacity worksheets and traffic count summaries are shown in Appendix A. The existing signalized intersection operations are shown below: Intersection Average Delay Intersection LOS (Sec.Neh.) S.R. 60/Hercules Avenue D 48.9 S.R. 60/Belcher Road F 148.6 S.R. 60/Old Coachman Road C 21.2 S.R. 60/U.S. 19 Ramps D 41.0 S.R. 601West Entrance-Bennigan's Access B 14.1 S.R. 60/Park Place Boulevard C 20.8 S.R. 60/ Sky Harbor Drive A 7.0 S.R. 60/Hampton Road A 4.1 S.R. 60/Bayside Bridge Ramps F 170.8 U.S. 19/Haines Bayshore F 114.6 U.S. 19Belleair Road F 95.2 U.S. 19/Nursery Road E 69.9 U.S. 19/Ham D 46.0 U.S. 19/Druid Road D 47.1 U.S. 19/Drew Street F 147.6 U.S. 19/S.R. 590 F 173.1 U.S. 19/Sunset Point Road F 147.6 Drew Street/Belcher Road E 73.8 Drew Street/Old Coachman Road E 64.7 Drew Street/Park Place Boulevard B 19.0 Drew Street/Hampton Road A 9.8 Drew Street/McMullen-Booth Road F 127.7 2 The Hampton Road/Island in the Sun MHP Access which is stop controlled was also analyzed. All movements presently operate at A or B. B. Roadwav Links Using the peak hour/peak season equivalent volumes, a capacity analysis was performed on each of the roadway links within the general vicinity of Park Place. All roadway link analysis was done on a directional basis. Roadway segment capacities were determined using the FDOT ART_TAB Software and generalized tables. These capacity tables are included in Appendix B. Table 1 shows the existing peak hour conditions on area roadways surrounding Park Place. i III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS ' As agreed to at the August 9, 2000, traffic methodology meeting, the following improvements are funded and are considered as committed within this analysis. PLANNED/PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway segment Improvement Construction Year Agency Drew Street (Highland - N.E. Coachman) Widen to 4LD 2000/01 FDOT #2570331 U.S. 19/Drew Street Interchange 2000/01 FDOT #2569571 U.S. 19 (S. of S.R. 590-N.of Sunset Point) Interchange 2002/03 FDOT #2568881 Keene Road (Druid to Drew) Widen to 6LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Drew - Sunset Point) Construct 4LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Sunset Point - Virginia) Widen to 4 LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920487 IV. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC This segment of the report provides projections of background traffic for the build-out year (2003). As agreed to at the August 9, 2000, transportation methodology meeting, growth rates for area roadways were developed by comparing FSUTMS model volumes. Existing peak hour/peak season traffic was adjusted using screen-line growth rates of 0.35% (east of U.S. 19) and 0.88% (west of U.S. 19) which indicate the "built-out" nature of mid-Pinellas County. 3 TABLE 1 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFIC ANALYSIS EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS-2000 LOS D LOS D LANE PEAK HR MSFR MSFR LOS LOS annnwnv 0.GTG/CCAI AAl 1 T/?O SR 60 KEENE ROAD HERCULES AVE 6 L D 4594 2420 v2174 2960 v2730 D V vyD u SR 60 HERCULES AVE BELCHER ROAD 6LD 4263 2217 2046 2960 2730 C C SR 60 BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 61.0 4278 2244 2034 2960 2730 C C SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 4253 1789 2464 2730 2960 C D SR 60 US 19 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE 6LD 4303 1850 2453 2350 3100 D D SR 60 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE PARK PLACE DR 6LD 3984 1697 2287 2350 3100 C D SR 60 PARK PLACE DR SKY HARBOR 6LD 4010 1689 2321 2350 3100 C D SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4132 1763 2369 2350 3100 D D SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 6LD 4173 1710 2463 2350 3100 C D US 19 HAINES-BAYSHORE BELLEAIR RD 6LD 6924 4020 2904 4080 3210 D C US 19 BELLEAIR RD NURSERY RD 6LD 6546 3830 2716 4080 3210 D C US 19 NURSERY ROAD HARN BLVD 6LD 6716 3743 2973 4080 3210 D D US 19 HARN BLVD DRUID/SEVILLE 6LD 6763 3787 2976 4080 3210 D D US 19 DRUID/SEVILLE SR 60 6LD 6511 3689 2822 4080 3210 C C US 19 SR 60 DREW 6LFRWY- 6208 3799 2409 5080 3820 C C US 19 DREW ST SR 590 6LFRWY• 5956 3633 2323 5080 3820 C C US 19 SR 590 SUNSET POINT RD 6LFRWY` 5684 3638 2046 5080 3820 C C US 19 SUNSET POINT RD ENTERPRISE 6LD 5935 3950 1985 2780 2110 F C DREW STREET N.E.COACHMAN BELCHER ROAD 4LD 1742 1023 719 1760 1340 B 8 DREW STREET BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1918 979 939 1760 1340 B B DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 1998 927 1071 1340 1760 B B DREW STREET US 19 PARK PLACE DR 4LD 1678 943 735 1760 1340 B B DREW STREET PARK PLACE DR HAMPTON 4LD 1535 826 709 1760 1340 B B DREW STREET HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 1421 824 597 1760 1340 B B SR 590 BELCHER ROAD US 19 2LU 1505 720 785 670 880 F C SR 590 US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 2LU 1533 721 812 670 880 F C SUNSET POINT ROAD BELCHER ROAD US 19 4LD 2311 1225 1086 1760 1340 C C SUNSET POINT ROAD US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 1722 744 978 1340 1760 B B BELCHER ROAD DRUID SR 60 4LD 2355 1331 1024 1760 1340 C C BELCHER ROAD SR 60 DREW STREET 4LD 2358 1313 1045 1760 1340 C C BELCHER ROAD DREW STREET N.E.COACHMAN 4LD 2498 1515 983 1760 1340 C C MCMULLEN-BOOTH SR 60 DREW STREET 6LD 5266 3212 2054 2640 2005 F E F E MCMULLEN-BOOTH DREW STREET SR 590 6LD 5438 3402 2036 2640 2005 F F BASED ON FDC TRAFFIC COUNTS JULY/AUGUST 2000 'NOTE: ASSUMES INTERCHANGES AT DREW, SR 590, SUNSET POINT AS COMMITTED ' V. FUTURE CONDITIONS This segment of the report provides estimates of vehicle trip generation, trip distribution, and ' analyzes operations with background traffic and with the project in-place for the build-out year (2003). A. Trin Generation Trip generation estimates were obtained from the ITE Trip Generation, 6r' Edition. As was done in all previous analysis, the retail space was analyzed using ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center), office space was analyzed using ITE Land Use Code 710 (Office Building), light industrial space was analyzed using ITE Land Use Code I10 (General Light Industrial) and the apartments were ' analyzed using ITE Land Use Code 220 (Apartments). A comparison of trip generation of the originally approved plan and the proposed development plan 1 is shown in Table 2A. As shown in Table 2A the originally approved development plan would generate 2,318 PM peak hour external trips, whereas the proposed development plan would generate ' only 1,527 PM peak hour external trips, therefore, this change represents a 34.1 % reduction in PM peak hour external vehicle trips. Based on a 15% internal capture, a 2.5% transit usage and retail pass by capture, the full project would result in1,279 external primary auto trips (380 entering/899 1 exiting). Pass- by traffic (210 trips) represents only 5.2% of adjacent peak hour traffic on S.R. 60. At this time portions of the development have been constructed and, therefore, already contribute ' to the existing traffic stream. Presently 81,120 square feet of retail space, 222,460 square feet of office space, 100,000 square feet of light industrial space and 390 multi-family dwelling units exist. The traffic generation estimates of existing project traffic based on ITE Trip Generation, 6' Edition I is shown in Table 2B. To avoid double counting, and per the methodology, trips generated by the built areas were subtracted from the total trip generation estimates to arrive at additional project traffic expected by unbuilt portions of the total project. B. Trip Distribution/Traffic Assignment ' Distribution and assignment of the full project 1,279 external primary trips to the surrounding roadway system was based on the Year 2010 FSUTMS regional model as approved at the August 9, 2000 transportation methodology meeting. The distribution percentages are shown in Figure 2. ' C. Delineation of Stud The project impact area (study area) includes all roadway segments where external primary peak hour trips (project traffic) comprises 4.5% or more of the LOS D directional peak hour "Maximum Service Flow Rate" (MSFR). Signalized intersections where project traffic comprises 4.5% or more of the intersection capacity were also included. The study area calculations are shown in Table 3 and are based on external primary trips from the entire DRI which is 1,279 external primary auto trips (380 entering/899 exiting). TABLE 2A PARK PLACE DRI ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPROVED PLAN TRIP GENERATION LAND ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL FXTFRNAI FNTFR EXIT OFFIC E 710 198,000 S.F 2242 301 30 271 46 225 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 480,000 S.F 4427 617 62 555 94 461 OFFIC E 710 125,000 S.F 1575 219 22 197 34 163 RETAIL 820 135,000 S.F 8267 765 76 689 331 358 RETAIL 820 15,000 S.F. 2012 180 18 162 78 84 TOTAL 22147 2576 258 2318 659 1659 PROPOSED AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNA FAKULL t# LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 10 186 23 16d- 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 71 158 106 52 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F 2436 327 16 311 53 258 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 97 327 157 170 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 8 163 28 135 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 59 198 95 103 TOTAL 16300 1797 270 1527 493 1034 WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS EXTERNAL AUTO ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 186 181 22 159 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 158 154 103 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F 2436 327 311 303 52 251 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 327 319 153 166 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 163 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 198 193 93 100 TOTAL 16300 1797 1527 1489 481 1008 WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL AUTO TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO AUTO PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS AUTO TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 181 181 22 159 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 154 154 103 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F 2436 327 303 303 52 251 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 319 188 90 98 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 159 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 193 114 55 59 TOTAL 16300 1797 1489 1279 ?Rn fRaa NOTES: 1. BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION, 6TH EDITION 2. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASSBY TRIPS 3. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 1998 AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 4. RETAIL SPACE IS AS ACTUALLY EXISTS AND TOTALS 81,120 S.F. 5. TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT IS 1,279 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS (380 ENTERING/899 EXITING) TABLE 2B PARK PLACE DRI TRIP GENERATION OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL ARCFL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 5 93 11 82 20 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 46 183 123 60 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 11 203 35 168 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 85 339 163 176 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 51 206 99 107 TOTAL 13558 1415 207 1208 462 746 WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNI 15 I KIF b I KlFb to I tKNAL AU I U trv 1 tK t7U I 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 93 91 11 80 20 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 183 178 119 59 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 203 198 34 164 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 339 330 159 171 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 206 200 96 104 TOTAL 13558 1415 1208 1177 450 727 WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL AUTO TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO AUTO PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS AUTO TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 91 91 11 80 20 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 178 178 119 59 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 198 198 34 164 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 330 195 94 101 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 200 118 57 61 TOTAL 13558 1415 1177 960 346 614 NOTES: 1. BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION, 6TH EDITION 2. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASSBY TRIPS 3. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 1998 AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 4. RETAIL SPACE IS AS ACTUALLY EXISTS AND TOTALS 81,120 S.F. 5. EXISTING PROJECT IMPACT IS 960 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS (346 ENTERING/614 EXITING) DESCRIPTION: PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PROJECT Na. 172-07 DATE: FIGURE: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9/00 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 2 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwafer FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC C7,1D - - TABLE 3 STUDY AREA DELINEATION PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT ON ROADWAYS UNBUILT (BASED ON 1279 EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS) ENTER 380 34 EXIT 899 285 TOTAL 1279 319 UNBUILT UNBUILT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT LOS D LOS D LOS D PERCENT PERCENT PROJECT PROJECT LANE TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS MSFR Rnanwav L3CTA/CCAI AAiII rinr- r,w.?,..... .....-- - -.-.-.-..-- MSFR MSFR LOS D LOS D STUDY TRAFFIC TRAFFIC SR 60 SR 60 SR 60 KEENE HERCULES BELCHER HERCULES BELCHER 6LD 6LD 166 205 49 61 117 144 vvv-vvn? 5,690 5,690 rvoico 2,960 2,960 AC/vvc 2,730 2,730 rvoitb 1.67% 2.059/. SblvvU 4.28% 5.270/. AREA YES NB/EB 4 5 SB/WB 37 46 SR 60 OLD COACHMAN OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 6LD 256 281 76 84 180 5,690 2,980 2,730 2.57% 6.59% YES 7 57 SR 60 US 19 BENNIGANS 6LD 486 144 198 342 5,690 5 450 2,730 2 350 2,960 3 100 3.06% 6 14% 6.68% 11 02% YES 7 63 SR 60 BENNIGANS PARK PLACE 6LD 486 144 342 , 5,450 , 2,350 , 3,100 . 6.14% . 11.02% YES YES 13 13 108 108 SR 60 PARK PLACE SKYHARBOR SLID 200 150 50 5,450 2,350 3,100 6.38% 1.61% YES 40 0 SR 60 SKYHARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 200 150 50 5,450 2,350 3,100 6.38% 1.61% YES 40 0 SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 6LD 256 180 76 5,450 2,350 3,100 7.65% 2 45% YES 57 7 SR 60 MCMULLEN-BOOTH BAYSHORE 6LD 77 54 23 5,450 2,350 3,100 2.30% . 0.74% 17 2 US 19 HAINES-BAYSHORE BELLEAIR SLID 128 38 90 7,290 4,080 3,210 0.93% 2.80% 3 29 US 19 BELLEAIR NURSERY SLID 141 42 99 7 290 4 080 3 210 1 02% 3 08% US 19 NURSERY HARN , , , . . 4 31 SLID 179 53 126 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.30% 3.92% 5 40 US 19 HARN DRUI5/SEVILLE 6LD 179 53 126 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.30% 3.92% 5 40 US 19 DRUID/SEVILLE SR 60 SLID 205 61 144 , 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.49% 4.48% 5 46 US 19 SR 60 DREW 6LFWY 0 0 0 8,900 5,080 3,820 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 US 19 DREW SR 590 6LFWY 281 198 84 8,900 5,080 3,820 3.89% 2.19% 63 7 US 19 SR 590 SUNSET POINT 6LFWY 243 171 72 8,900 5,080 3,820 3.36% 1 89% 54 6 US 19 SUNSET POINT ENTERPRISE RD 141 99 42 4,890 2,780 2,110 3.56% . 1.98% 31 4 BELLEAIR US 19 BELCHER ---2L-U- 13 4 9 1,330 570 760 0.67% 1.18% 0 3 NURSERY US 19 BELCHER 2LU 26 8 18 1,330 570 760 1.33% 2.37% 1 6 DREW N.E. COACHMAN BELCHER 4LD 64 19 45 3,100 1,760 1,340 1.08% 3 35% 2 14 DREW BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 4LID 102 30 72 3,100 1,760 1,340 1.73% . 5.37% YES 3 23 DREW OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 115 34 81 3,100 1,340 1,760 2.55% 4 60% YES 3 26 DREW US 19 PARK PLACE 4LD 396 118 279 3,100 1,760 1,340 6.69% . 20.80% YES 11 88 DREW PARK PLACE HAMPTON 4LD 102 72 30 3,100 1,760 1,340 4.09% 2.27% 23 3 DREW HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 102 72 30 3,100 1,760 1,340 4.09% 2.27% 23 3 SR 590 BELCHER US 19 2LU 13 4 9 1,550 670 880 0.57% 1.02% 0 3 SR 590 US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 2LU 26 18 8 1,550 670 880 2.680/. 0.869/o 6 1 SUNSET POINT BELCHER US 19 4LD 51 15 36 3,100 1,760 1,340 0.86% 2 68% 1 11 SUNSET POINT US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 38 27 11 3,100 1 340 1 760 2 01% . 0 65% 9 BELCHER DRUID SR 60 4LD 51 15 36 3,100 , 1,760 , 1,340 . 0.86% . 2.680/. 1 1 11 BELCHER SR 60 DREW 4LD 13 4 9 3,100 1,760 1,340 0.22% 0 67% 0 3 BAYSIDE BRIDGE ROOSEVELT SR 60 6LFWY 179 53 126. 8,900 5 080 3 820 1 05% . 3 29% 5 4 MCMULLEN BOOTH DREW SR 590 6LD 64 45 19, 4,645 , 2,640 , 2,005 . 1.70% . 0.95% 14 0 2 ' Although the proposed project has a total impact of 1,279 external primary auto trips during the PM peak hour, 960 of these trips (346 entering/614 exiting) are from existing buildings, therefore, the ' project will result in an additional 319 external primary auto trips (34 entering/285 exiting). D. Capacity Analysis ' As confirmed by Table 3 the project impact area includes portions of S.R. 60 (Hercules Avenue to McMullen-Booth Road) and portions of Drew Street (Belcher Road to Park Place Boulevard). ' Additional unbuilt project traffic was added to accumulated background traffic throughout the year 2003. The projected 2003 total volume was compared to the 1991 volume predicted in the original ADA, and this comparison is shown in Table 4. Roadways where previously analyzed volumes were not exceeded by the 2003 projected volumes are not subject to further analysis since no additional impact is created and since the impacts are mitigated by the Development Order. Due to the build- out extension to 2003, total expected volume exceeds the predicted volume on only the following ' roadway segments: S.R.60 (Park Place Blvd - Sky Harbor Drive) ' S.R. 60 (Sky Harbor Drive - Hampton Road) S.R. 60 (Hampton Road - McMullen-Booth Road) Drew Street (Belcher Road - Old Coachman Road) ' Drew Street (Old Coachman Road - U.S. 19) Total 2003 projected traffic volumes and expected levels of service are shown in Table 5. As ' shown, all roadway segments that are significantly impacted would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service and in particular those segments listed above where there is increased volume would continue to operate acceptably. ' The intersections where project traffic comprised 4.5% or more of the intersection capacity were analyzed to include background traffic, and project added traffic. The HCM intersections analysis worksheets are shown in Appendix C and the resulting levels of service are shown below. Intersection Average Delay ' Intersection LOS (Sec.Neh.) S.R. 60/U.S. 19 Ramps D 42.6 S.R. 60/Bennigan's Drive B 19.0 S.R. 60/Park Place C 23.8 Drew St/U.S. 19* F 158.3 ' Drew St/Park Place Blvd D 40.4 Hampton Rd/Bausch & Lomb Drive A/B 7.9/10.4 ' Hampton Rd/Parcel 6 Drive A/A 7.4/9.1 *As specified in the Development Order, a grade separated interchange will be required at the U.S. ' 19/Drew Street intersection. With the interchange the intersection of Drew Street / US 19 Ramps would operate at LOS D. ' 5 TABLE 4 PARK PLACE DRI NOPC TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1991 1991 1991 2003 2003 2003 2003 ORIGINAL BUILDOUT BUILDOUT ORIGINAL BUILDOUT BUILDOUT BUILDOUT LANE VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME GREATER RnGnN/GV ocT.lc- nl.ln rvn? -- SR 60 HERCULES BELCHER ROAD 6LD 5435 2660 2775 4427 2281 J?IVVO 2146 I IVIrMI. I NO SR 60 BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 6LD 5040 2455 2585 4456 2311 2145 NO SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 5545 2830 2715 4437 1844 2593 NO SR 60 SR 60 US 19 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE BENNIGAN'S DRIVE PARK PLACE BLVD 6LD 6LD 6360 5080 2945 2200 3415 2880 4437 4188 1882 1728 2587 2419 NO NO SR 60 PARK PLACE BLVD SKY HARBOR 6LD 4340 2145 2195 4163 1747 2345 YES SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4450 2205 2245 4240 1822 2394 YES SR 60 DREW STREET HAMPTON BELCHER ROAD MCMULLEN-BOOTH OLD COACHMAN 6LD 4LD 4465 1885 2305 980 2160 905 4281 1995 1785 1008 2496 987 YES YES DREW STREET DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 US 19 PARK PLACE DR 4LD 41-D 2045 2740 975 1520 1070 1220 1706 1795 955 964 1126 831 YES NO TABLE 5 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT - 2003 BACKGRD. TRAFFIC PROJECT TRAFFIC TOTAL TOTAL EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING 2003 2003 ADDED ADDED 2003 2003 LOS D LOSD tsnn LANE PM PM _PM- PM PM- PM PM PM PM MSFR MSFR LOS LOS nvmv _-_- SR 60 HERCULES AVE BELCHER ROAD 6LD 4263 2217 2046 2276 2100 ?.olco 5 Oolvvo 46 1140/ca 2281 Jnrvvt$ 2146 Nt3/tb 2960 St1/WS 2730 NB/EB D SB/WB D SR 60 BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 6LD 4278 2244 2034 2304 2088 7 57 2311 2145 2960 2730 D D SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 4253 1789 2464 1837 2530 7 63 1844 2593 2730 2960 C 0 SR 60 US 19 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE 6LD 4303 1850 2453 1869 2479 13 108 1082 2587 2350 3100 D D SR 60 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE PARK PLACE 6LD 3984 1697 2287 1715 2311 13 108 1728 2419 2350 3100 D D SR 60 PARK PLACE SKY HARBOR 6LD 4010 1689 2321 1707 2345 40 0 1747 2345 2350 3100 D D SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4132 1763 2369 1782 2394 40 0 1822 2394 2350 3100 D . D SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 6LD 4173 1710 2463 1728 2489 57 7 1785 2496 2350 3100 D D DREW STREET BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1916 979 939 1005 964 3 23 1008 987 1760 1340 B C DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 1998 927 1071 952 1100 3 26 955 1126 1340 1760 C B DREW STREET US 19 PARK PLACE 4LD 1678 943 735 953 743 11 88 964 831 1760 1340 B B BASED ON FDC TRAFFIC COUNTS JULY/AUGUST 2000 BASED ON SCREENLINE GROWTH RATES INCLUDES ADDITIONAL (UNBUILT) PROJECT TRAFFIC ONLY C VI. CONCLUSION The Park Place DRI when fully built-out will contain 81,120 square feet retail space, 404,639 square feet of office space, 200,000 square feet of light industrial space and 390 multi-family dwelling units. Trip generation estimates for the entire project indicate a total of 1,527 PM peak hour external trips, This represents a 34.1 % reduction in PM peak hour external trips when compared to the approved development plan. Due to this reduction and scheduled roadway improvements, the impact area is greatly reduced.. With the extension of project build-out to 2003, total traffic volume in the revised build-out year will exceed previously predicted volume on a limited number of roadway segments. All roadway segments significantly impacted would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service and all signalized intersections significantly impacted would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. As such, no additional roadway improvements above and beyond those identified in the Development Order are necessitated. Therefore, the proposed change would not constitute a "substantial deviation" from a transportation perspective as per FS 380.06(19)(b)(15)_ Regarding conversion factors for converting office space to multi-family units or hotel rooms on Parcel 6, the following conversion factors are recommended- Office's may be converted to hotel rooms at a rate of 1,000 s.f. = 2.44 hotel rooms for a maximum of 244 rooms. Office may be converted to multi family units at a rate of 1,000 s.f. = 2.40 units with a maximums of 240 units. These are based on the following trip generation rates.: Office =1.49 trips/1,000 s.£ Hotel = 0.61 trips/room Multi-family = 0.62 trips/unit Conversion from office to either hotel or multi-family would increase the internal capture and decrease the directional traffic impact as compared to this analysis of 100,000 s.f. ofoffice space on Parcel 6. TLTARX PLACE REPoxT.DAT 6 APPENDIX A ITEM PAGE Traffic Count Summary A-1 Traffic Count U.S. 19, North of Ham Blvd A-2 to A-4 Traffic Count U.S. 19, North of Drew St. A-5 to A-7 Traffic Count U.S. 19, South of Sunset Point Rd. A-8 to A-10 Traffic Count Drew St, East of Hampton Rd A-11 to A13 Traffic Count Gulf-to-Bay Blvd, East of Hercules Ave A-14 to A-16 Traffic Count Gulf-to-Bay Blvd, East of U.S. 19 A-17 to A-19 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Hercules Ave A-20 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Belcher Rd A-21 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Old Coachman Rd A-22 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/U.S. 19 Ramps A-23 HCS S.R. 60/Benningan's Drive A-24 HCS S.R. 60/Park Place Blvd A-25 HCS S.R. 60/Sky Harbor Dr. A-26 HCS S.R. 60/Hampton Rd A-27 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/McMullen-Booth Ramps A-28 HCS U.S. 19/Haines Bayshore A-29 HCS U.S. 19Belleair Rd A-30 HCS U.S. 19/Nursery Rd A-31 HCS U.S. 19/Harn Blvd A-32 HCS U.S. 19/Druid/Seville A-33 HCS U.S. 19/Drew St A-34 HCS U.S. 19/N.E. Coachman A-35 HCS U.S. 19/Sunset Point Rd A-36 HCS Drew St/Belcher Rd A-37 HCS Drew St/Old Coachman Rd A-38 HCS Drew St/Park Place A-39 HCS Drew St/Hampton Rd A-40 HCS Drew St/McMullen-Booth Rd A-41 HCS Hampton Rd/Baush & Lomb/Island in the Sun MHP A-42 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY 1. U.S. 19 (North of Ham Blvd) 3-Day Average ADT 77,741 AADT 77,733 K1oo = 0.087 2. U.S. 19 (North of Drew Street) 3-Day Average ADT 71,663 AADT 70,903 K1oo = 0.084 3. U.S. 19 (South of Sunset Point Road) 3-Day Average ADT 70,059 AADT 69,316 K1oo= 0.082 4. Drew Street (East of Hampton Road) 3-Day Average ADT 15,656 AADT 15,969 Kioo = 0.089 5. Gulf-To-Bay Blvd (East of Hercules) 3-Day Average ADT 52,013 AADT 51,992 K1oo = 0.082 6. Gulf-To-Bay Blvd (East of U.S.19) 3-Day Average ADT 49,476 AADT 49,456 Kioo = 0.087 - Site Reference: 172-07 Site ID: PARK PLACE Location: US 19 N. OF HARN BLV TIME MON TUE 17 18 Lane 1 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 108 571 00:30 107 586 00:45 92 611 01:00 89 573 01:15 84 583 01:30 70 612 01:45 71 565 02:00 48 56 568 02:15 510 46 596 02:30 559 61 553 02:45 549 34 537 03:00 596 35 620 03:15 619 36 631 03:30 631 25 611 03:45 637 37 670 04:00 777 29 750 04:15 741 31 645 04:30 798 35 857 04:45 770 39 798 05:00 923 34 840 05:15 878 50 898 05:30 1011 49 924 05:45 981 72 929 06:00 932 118 5 06:15 834 151 901 06:30 799 176 856 06:45 755 226 720 07:00 635 293 616 07:15 536 381 547 07:30 564 338 498 07:45 502 424 490 08:00 433 551 386 08:15 399 562 366 08:30 382 558 352 08:45 417 496 359 09:00 331 573 297 09:15 278 557 286 09:30 320 473 294 09:45 312 468 278 10:00 246 477 246 10:15 255 423 254 10:30 277 434 302 10:45 236 448 290 11:00 206 436 232 11:15 223 445 170 11:30 225 492 148 11:45 225 518 153 12:00 144 503 148 ------------------------------- TOTALS 21494 37383 AM Times 8:15 AM Peaks 2189 PM Times 17:15 17:30 PM Peaks 3802 3609 A-2- Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/17/00 File: es\itc\e.prn User: D., CLEARWATER Direction: NORTH WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 19 20 21 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 116 575 110 550 96 573 430 2269 107 567 114 615 117 612 96 670 434 2483 108 620 101 618 102 580 80 597 375 2406 93 601 74 574 76 559 75 595 314 2301 78 575 81 628 87 602 73 573 325 2386 81 596 66 623 76 571 63 552 275 2358 68 589 50 539 69 522 69 525 259 2151 64 537 53 562 67 584 49 544 225 2306 56 461 43 561 54 534 47 338 190 2539 47 507 66 497 46 515 65 238 2124 59 531 50 506 40 522 18 142 2114 35 528 27 598 26 603 38 126 2417 31 604 33 589 27 560 21 117 2399 29 599 24 614 28 603 31 108 2459 27 614 24 648 15 645 17 93 2600 23 650 22 753 26 711 24 101 2991 25 747 29 656 24 601 25 109 2643 27 660 37 811 31 678 28 131 3144 32 786 22 821 23 900 21 103 3289 25 822 43 828 33 777 25 135 3368 33 842 37 846 42 826 44 173 3448 43 862 41 943 47 917 31 168 3795 42 948 69 91 67 893 58 266 3717 66 929 99 890 77 835 75 369 3512 92 878 134 810 114 795 109 508 3340 127 835 177 833 150 719 142 645 3207 161 801 216 635 175 642 197 814 2752 203 688 283 607 236 565 226 1038 2423 259 605 296 524 305 502 272 1254 2109 313 527 328 456 347 494 276 1289 2012 322 503 390 481 347 462 330 1491 1935 372 483 467 404 445 404 384 1847 1627 461 406 468 430 493 392 453 1976 1587 494 396 513 356 473 355 451 1995 1445 498 361 532 363 464 322 451 1943 1461 485 365 515 273 483 256 467 2038 1157 509 289 578 322 483 259 441 2059 1145 514 286 429 298 406 296 414 1722 1208 430 302 459 289 426 319 457 1810 1198 452 299 440 252 415 240 422 1754 984 438 246 474 239 408 221 408 1713 969 428 242 467 258 414 217 427 1742 1054 435 263 403 231 456 229 458 1765 986 441 246 455 170 423 150 376 1690 758 422 189 469 151 426 134 445 1785 678 446 169 499 163 455 165 460 1906 701 476 175 489 162 473 138 522 2002 678 500 169 502 146 540 122 527 2072 560 518 140 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36366 34763 15251 0 0 145257 36033 8:30 8:15 11:15 2138 1913 1954 17:15 17:15 12:15 3593 3471 2435 Site Reference: 172-07 Site ID: PARK PLACE Location: US 19 N. OF HARN BLV TIME MON TUE 17 18 Lane 2 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 98 591 00:30 79 626 00:45 88 643 01:00 46 656 01:15 63 618 01:30 46 607 01:45 46 673 02:00 30 41 635 02:15 223 44 615 02:30 228 38 610 02:45 223 33 662 03:00 245 33 637 03:15 222 25 607 03:30 240 30 629 03:45 216 33 708 04:00 258 52 706 04:15 245 38 613 04:30 275 46 621 04:45 244 71 736 05:00 227 109 681 05:15 244 82 659 05:30 314 139 725 05:45 298 224 673 06:00 288 304 599 06:15 249 350 602 06:30 271 457 558 06:45 208 656 531 07:00 182 790 542 07:15 180 785 498 07:30 204 897 481 07:45 153 944 424 08:00 146 903 418 08:15 135 862 457 08:30 135 864 424 08:45 119 810 427 09:00 150 676 410 09:15 115 511 451 09:30 133 531 394 09:45 103 569 369 10:00 99 514 331 10:15 101 542 306 10:30 80 506 271 10:45 70 550 216 11:00 59 542 202 11:15 49 588 172 11:30 59 536 172 11:45 57 525 131 12:00 31 580 115 ------------------------------- TOTALS 7108 41728 AM Times 7:30 AM Peaks 3606 PM Times 17:30 16:45 PM Peaks 1149 2801 /`x'13 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/17/00 File: es\itc\e.prn User: D., CLEARWATER Direction: SOUTH WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 19 20 21 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 104 605 110 628 47 245 359 2069 89 517 74 625 83 616 29 189 265 2056 66 514 97 680 95 651 24 223 304 2197 76 549 52 627 58 662 23 280 179 2225 44 556 64 631 69 635 18 257 214 2141 53 535 49 327 46 619 21 231 162 1784 40 446 50 677 48 682 25 245 169 2277 42 569 46 651 53 642 8 255 148 2213 37 442 47 562 50 614 13 163 154 2197 38 439 36 589 33 592 19 126 2019 31 504 34 653 36 649 6 109 2187 27 546 42 628 36 653 7 118 2163 29 540 19 612 27 598 7 78 2039 19 509 35 646 29 619 9 103 2134 25 533 32 692 37 698 9 111 2314 27 578 50 689 51 703 10 163 2356 40 589 37 618 35 620 12 122 2096 30 524 42 608 41 618 12 141 2122 35 530 76 70 69 729 9 225 2415 56 603 105 684 10,6 691 25 345 2283 86 570 85 644 85 668 20 272 2215 68 553 133 749 129 25 426 2527 106 631 239 658 236 681 51 750 2310 187 577 304 584 285 601 79 972 2072 243 518 353 574 344 581 89 1136 2006 284 501 453 533 451 543 110 1471 1905 367 476 642 521 641 528 189 2128 1788 532 447 757 505 550 539 258 2355 1768 588 442 786 472 762 501 265 2598 1651 649 412 921 476 937 479 314 3069 1640 767 410 926 433 954 419 339 3163 1429 790 357 862 426 889 408 390 3044 1398 761 349 851 466 822 441 384 2919 1499 729 374 861 405 849 415 369 2943 1379 735 344 801 419 804 439 351 2766 1404 691 351 683 435 714 421 297 2370 1416 592 354 522 450 680 459 273 1986 1475 496 368 505 391 504 401 229 1769 1319 442 329 568 419 498 381 183 1818 1272 454 318 504 309 530 339 166 1714 1078 428 269 544 312 545 310 190 1821 1029 455 257 488 301 485 287 200 1679 939 419 234 550 238 519 220 200 1819 744 454 186 575 206 580 208 221 1918 675 479 168 584 175 572 186 203 1947 582 486 145 567 198 561 180 198 1862 609 465 152 507 134 526 135 212 1770 457 442 114 565 120 561 121 218 1924 387 481 96 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 41310 41674 8444 0 0 140264 34805 7:30 7:30 8:00 Na 9$ 3560 3602 1494 16:45 16: 45 13:00 3 9 2 758' X32 ° ' S 2783 2827 1013 3531 2795 A-4- Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/17/00 Site Reference: 172-07 Site ID: PARK PLACE Location: US 19 N. OF HARN BLVD., CLEARWATER TIME MON TUE WED THU 17 18 19 20 1 Lane 3 am pm am pm am pm am pm am --------------------------------------------------------- 00: 15 00:30 00:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 78 0215 733 0230 787 02:45 772 03:00 841 03:15 841 03:30 871 03:45 853 0400 1035 0415 986 0430 1073 0445 1014 05:00 1150 05:15 1122 05:30 1325 05:45 1279 06:00 1220 06:15 1083 06:30 1070 06:45 963 07:00 817 07:15 716 0730 768 0745 655 0800 579 08:15 534 08:30 517 08:45 536 09:00 481 09:15 393 09:30 453 09:45 415 10:00 345 10:15 356 10:30 357 10:45 306 11:00 265 11:15 272 11:30 284 11:45 282 12:00 175 206 1162 220 1180 220 1178 186 1212 188 1240 200 1228 180 1254 198 1298 197 1231 135 1229 126 1201 134 1221 147 1201 145 1259 156 1237 116 1219 115 950 122 1190 117 1238 100 1216 117 1204 97 1203 99 1213 120 1226 90 1211 90 1143 104 1148 99 1163 102 1086 79 1107 67 1199 84 1159 76 1171 68 1257 69 1226 62 1256 61 1238 52 1201 54 1158 55 1240 59 1260 57 1222 70 1378 56 1340 52 1343 81 1456 72 1442 77 1414 69 1258 66 1274 59 1221 81 1478 79 1419 72 1296 110 534 98 1527 90 1629 143 1521 148 1512 139 1468 132 1557 122 1490 127 494 188 1649 174 1692 176 6 6 296 1602 308 572 303 1574 422 1454 403 1474 362 1436 501 1503 487 1384 458 1376 633 1414 630 1366 601 1262 882 1251 858 1156 816 1170 1083 1158 1040 1112 786 1104 1166 1045 1082 996 1067 1003 1235 979 1249 932 1284 973 1368 914 1316 914 1301 881 1454 804 1329 830 1334 812 1424 823 1319 896 1315 833 1422 776 1374 761 1322 770 1306 786 1333 782 1268 761 1249 707 1198 708 1197 677 1068 737 1100 772 1163 718 1004 688 934 689 910 697 1037 647 1027 708 924 700 991 577 944 561 945 579 965 560 1018 551 953 531 940 573 955 559 899 504 998 506 953 469 975 449 978 434 1030 376 1003 358 1033 342 1053 326 998 320 1028 320 1066 361 1016 345 1043 284 996 296 999 273 1083 263 1067 266 1101 243 Page: 3 File: es\itc\e.prn User: Direction: ROAD TOTAL FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 21 pm am pm am pm am pm am pm -------------------------------------------------- 143 818 789 4338 197 1084 125 859 699 4539 174 1134 104 820 679 4603 169 1150 98 875 493 4526 123 1131 91 830 539 4527 134 1131 84 783 437 4142 109 1035 94 770 428 4428 3.07 1107 57 799 373 4519 93 903 60 501 344 4736 86 947 84 364 4143 91 1035 24 251 4301 62 1075 45 244 4580 61 1145 28 195 4438 48 1109 40 211 4593 52 1148 26 204 4914 51 1228 34 264 5347 66 1336 37 231 4739 57 1184 40 272 5266 68 1316 30 328 5704 82 1426 50 480 5651 120 1412 64 445 5663 111 1415 56 594 6322 148 1580 109 1016 6027 254 1506 154 1341 5584 335 1396 198 1644 5346 411 1336 252 2116 5112 529 1278 386 2942 4540 735 1135 484 3393 4191 848 1047 537 3852 3760 963 940 590 4358 3652 1089 913 669 4654 3364 1163 841 774 4891 3025 1222 756 837 4895 3086 1223 771 820 4938 2824 1234 706 802 4709 2865 1177 716 764 4408 2573 1102 643 714 4045 2620 1011 655 643 3491 2527 872 631 640 3628 2470 907 617 588 3468 2062 867 515 598 3534 1998 883 499 627 3421 1993 855 498 658 3584 1730 896 432 597 3608 1433 902 358 648 3732 1260 933 315 658 3768 1310 942 327 734 3772 1135 943 283 745 3996 947 999 236 ---------- TOTALS ----------- 28602 ----------- 79111 ----------- 77676 ------------ 76437 AM Times 7:45 8:00 7:45 AM Peaks 5668 5355 5272 ' PM Times 17:15 17:00 17:00 16:45 PM Peaks 4946 6329 6266 6247 I f/p 0.0go 19,0g/ O.p?2 -------------------------------------------------- 23695 0 0 285521 7°0885 8:00 3 Po ? 7 f 7 g l 3233 12:30 ?7 3384 - 733 4,08/ = 0. 087 C13 Ng -37e? h;? ?. 6/74?3 S3 2-14? A°5- I Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 (Location: US 19, N. OF DREW ST TIME MON TUE 31 1 Lane 1 --am --pm----am- -pm- ( 00:15 132 508 00:30 133 642 00:45 122 608 01:00 76 627 01:15 95 645 01:30 72 658 01:45 69 604 I 02:00 67 611 02:15 44 654 02:30 573 63 630 02:45 547 41 655 03:00 536 30 682 03:15 657 32 702 I 03:30 585 45 619 03:45 627 36 726 04:00 757 20 829 04:15 642 26 816 04:30 642 44 786 04:45 782 27 7 0 05:00 822 48 891 05:15 832 26 855 05:30 748 47 860 05:45 886 64 908 06:00 808 107 873 06:15 710 133 822 06:30 752 158 817 06:45 799 227 880 07:00 729 308 707 07:15 536 332 567 07:30 549 329 638 07:45 567 426 560 08:00 451 413 486 08:15 457 508 438 08:30 497 452 455 08:45 466 507 473 09:00 436 491 408 09:15 367 610 129 09:30 395 427 123 09:45 288 442 201 10:00 295 544 313 10.15 252 505 239 10:30 295 449 307 10:45 210 539 214 11:00 179 522 241 11:15 173 492 258 11:30 191 539 229 11:45 174 566 172 12:00 116 547 135 ------------------------------- TOTALS 20328 38903 Times 11:15 AM Peaks 2144 F M Times 17:00 17:00 M Peaks 3288 3514 Florida Design Consultants Inc WED 2 am--pm -130 585 113 604 122 491 83 594 67 592 73 574 72 599 45 579 58 580 60 663 52 610 58 626 44 607 49 579 30 711 33 744 24 705 33 842 39 829 30 844 55 773 60 933 70 33 104 664 133 645 145 670 199 579 305 704 317 527 297 564 402 542 376 486 458 457 498 485 482 457 476 380 563 441 457 376 482 367 508 308 485 277 461 298 472 263 508 257 477 238 467 241 589 213 530 182 37709 11:15 2063 17:00 3383 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/31/0 File: i\19drew.prn User: Direction: NORTH THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------ 144 611 0 406 1704 101 568 132 666 0 378 1912 94 637 135 605 0 379 1704 94 568 111 592 0 270 1813 67 604 99 699 0 261 1936 65 645 95 660 0 240 1892 60 630 66 613 0 207 1816 51 605 61 610 0 173 1800 43 600 60 674 0 162 1908 40 636 67 670 0 190 2536 47 634 48 636 0 141 2448 35 612 45 619 0 133 2463 33 615 41 657 0 117 2623 29 655 38 585 0 132 2368 33 592 36 627 0 102 2691 25 672 44 757 0 97 3087 24 771 30 642 0 80 2805 20 701 35 642 0 112 2912 28 728 45 782 0 111 3163 27 790 33 822 0 111 3379 27 844 47 832 0 128 3292 32 823 47 748 0 154 3289 38 822 61 886 0 195 3513 48 878 98 808 0 309 3153 77 788 124 710 0 390 2887 97 721 170 348 0 473 2587 118 646 208 130 0 634 2388 158 597 301 976 0 914 3116 228 779 295 935 0 944 2565 236 641 335 779 0 961 2530 240 632 327 849 0 1155 2518 288 629 441 736 0 1230 2159 307 539 442 636 0 1408 1988 352 497 457 760 0 1407 2197 351 549 449 676 0 1438 2072 359 518 604 649 0 1571 1873 392 468 516 619 2 1691 1556 422 389 485 585 0 1369 1479 342 369 397 558 1321 1414 440 353 507 497 1559 1413 519 353 454 523 1444 1291 481 322 495 483 1405 1383 468 345 504 436 1515 1123 505 280 488 413 1518 1090 506 272 469 298 1438 967 479 241 482 191 1488 852 496 213 588 174 1743 733 581 183 563 116 1640 549 546 137 ------------------------------ 41239 2 0 0 138181 37140 11:15 8:30 2102 2 19:00 3539 Site Reference: PAR Site ID: 172-07 Location: US 19, N. TIME MON 31 Lane 2 am pm ------------------- 00:15 00:30 00:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 436 02:45 616 03:00 555 03:15 517 03:30 523 03:45 455 04:00 538 04:15 548 04:30 570 04:45 523 05:00 541 05:15 570 05:30 580 05:45 611 06:00 491 06:15 535 06:30 535 06:45 444 07:00 379 07:15 397 07:30 385 07:45 385 08:00 301 08:15 288 08:30 326 08:45 279 09:00 319 09:15 297 09:30 345 09:45 304 10:00 245 10:15 214 10:30 202 10:45 160 11:00 160 11.15 141 11:30 135 11:45 98 12:00 89 ------------------- TOTALS 15037 AM Times K PLACE OF DREW ST TUE 1 am pm 92 526 70 516 55 460 58 477 48 619 35 470 49 486 23 549 35 485 24 507 23 544 26 511 19 499 30 595 24 510 48 547 39 570 48 541 47 530 88 36 80 527 116 610 201 599 333 0 252 585 444 542 582 467 619 374 654 349 773 405 748 307 795 305 819 254 745 267 633 263 599 277 524 194 510 257 432 219 414 216 480 149 477 185 511 147 474 133 492 129 445 117 439 101 552 88 ------------ 34078 7:30 Flox WED 2 am pm 66 499 52 404 52 379 55 445 39 420 27 423 36 457 26 430 26 524 29 463 24 494 22 473 23 448 11 449 23 479 27 539 26 510 39 n50 32 73 58 86 135 49 1 254 538 274 467 310 472 458 424 545 427 497 369 660 310 688 327 767 263 751 269 729 239 573 241 519 261 465 283 452 272 370 233 355 202 374 174 395 192 408 160 439 148 424 138 454 116 439 117 467 97 30718 7:45 A ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/31/0 File: i\19drew.prn User: Direction: SOUTH THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------ 80 482 0 238 1507 59 502 55 488 0 177 1408 44 469 61 489 0 168 1328 42 442 54 574 0 167 1496 41 498 39 526 0 126 1565 31 521 30 563 0 92 1456 23 485 36 486 0 121 1429 30 476 41 592 0 90 1571 22 523 29 479 0 90 1488 22 496 17 479 0 70 1885 17 471 30 552 0 77 2206 19 551 26 454 0 74 1993 18 498 16 517 0 58 1981 14 495 22 523 0 63 2090 15 522 24 455 0 71 1899 17 474 14 538 0 89 2162 22 540 24 548 0 89 2176 22 544 29 570 0 116 2194 29 548 38 52 0 117 2081 29 520 64 541 0 225 2132 56 533 57 570 0 195 2168 48 542 97 580 0 299 2315 74 578 144 6 1 0 480 2312 120 578 213 491 0 800 2030 200 507 267 535 0 793 2122 198 530 323 535 0 1077 2084 269 521 398 444 0 1438 1779 359 444 510 379 0 1674 1559 418 389 580 397 0 1731 1512 432 378 576 385 0 2009 1485 502 371 614 385 0 2050 1404 512 351 698 301 0 2260 1170 565 292 630 288 0 2200 1099 550 274 713 326 0 2187 1158 546 289 597 279 0 1803 1062 450 265 514 319 0 1632 1176 408 294 497 297 4 1510 1071 377 267 402 345 0 1364 1219 341 304 399 304 1201 1060 400 265 416 245 1185 908 395 227 401 214 1255 751 418 187 407 202 1279 781 426 195 397 160 1316 627 438 156 413 160 1326 601 442 150 426 141 1342 549 447 137 424 135 1323 503 441 125 401 98 1279 414 426 103 505 89 1524 363 508 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 32342 4 0 0 112179 30199 7:45 8:30 11- PM Times 17:00 17:30 17:15 17:00 PM Peaks 2302 2304 2075 2302 z R ?V 35-14- 2-2-72- I-,,) 33 7 9 go 65 /? 32- e,? S7?6 - •61 -Sy`gq = .62- 2-30z 5-S*? o = 57 P° 0. 6/ A`-7 Florida Design Consultants Inc ' WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/31/0 Site Reference: PARK PLACE File: i\19drew.prn Site ID: 172-07 User: ' Location: US 19, N. OF DREW ST Direction: ROAD TOTAL TIME MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 31 1 2 3 4 ' Lane 3 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm m P ------------------------ -- 00:15 224 1034 196 1084 224 1093 0 644 3211 161 1070 00:30 203 1158 165 1008 187 1154 0 555 3320 138 1106 00:45 177 1068 174 870 196 1094 0 547 3032 136 1010 01:00 134 1104 138 1039 165 1166 0 437 3309 109 1103 01:15 143 1264 106 1012 138 1225 0 387 3501 96 1167 01:30 107 1128 100 997 125 1223 0 332 3348 83 1116 01:45 118 1090 108 1056 102 1099 0 328 3245 82 1081 02:00 90 1160 71 1009 102 1202 0 263 3371 65 1123 02:15 79 1139 84 1104 89 1153 0 252 3396 63 1132 02:30 1009 87 1137 89 1126 84 1149 0 260 4421 65 1105 02:45 1163 64 1199 76 1104 78 1188 0 218 4654 54 1163 03:00 1091 56 1193 80 1099 71 1073 0 207 4456 51 1114 ' 03:15 1174 51 1201 67 1055 57 1174 0 175 4604 43 1151 03:30 1108 75 1214 60 1028 60 1108 0 195 4458 48 1114 03:45 1082 60 1236 53 1190 60 1082 0 173 4590 43 1147 04:00 1295 68 1376 60 1283 58 1295 0 186 5249 46 1312 04:15 1190 65 1386 50 1215 54 1190 0 169 4981 42 1245 I 04:30 1212 92 1327 72 35 64 1212 0 228 5106 57 1276 04:45 1305 74 1300 71 1334 83 130 0 228 5244 57 1311 05:00 1363 136 1427 103 L274 358 97 1363 0 336 5511 84 1377 05:15 1402 106 1382 113 104 1402 0 323 5460 80 1365 ' 05:30 1328 163 1470 146 478 144 1328 0 453 5604 113 1401 05:45 1497 265 1507 205 1324 205 1497 0 675 5825 168 1456 06:00 1299 440 358 1202 311 1299 0 1109 5183 277 1295 06:15 1245 385 1407 407 1112 391 1245 0 1183 5009 295 1252 06:30 1287 602 1359 455 1142 493 883 0 1550 4671 387 1167 ' 06:45 1243 809 1347 657 1003 606 574 0 2072 4167 518 1041 07:00 1108 927 1081 850 1131 811 1355 0 2588 4675 647 1168 07:15 933 986 916 814 896 875 1332 0 2675 4077 668 1019 07:30 934 1102 1043 957 874 911 1164 0 2970 4015 742 1003 07:45 952 1174 867 1090 869 941 1234 0 3205 3922 801 980 ' 08:00 752 1208 791 1143 749 1139 1037 0 3490 3329 872 832 08:15 745 1327 692 1209 726 1072 924 0 3608 3087 902 771 08:30 823 1197 722 1227 724 1170 1086 0 3594 3355 898 838 08:45 745 1140 736 1055 698 1046 955 0 3241 3134 810 783 09:00 755 1090 685 995 641 1118 968 0 3203 3049 800 762 09:15 664 1134 323 1048 724 1013 916 6 3201 2627 800 656 09:30 740 937 380 909 648 887 930 0 2733 2698 683 674 09:45 592 874 420 852 600 796 862 2522 2474 840 618 10:00 540 958 529 863 510 923 742 2744 2321 914 580 1 10:15 466 985 388 859 451 855 737 2699 2042 899 510 10:30 497 926 492 856 490 902 685 2684 2164 894 541 10.45 370 1050 361 880 423 901 596 2831 1750 943 437 11:00 339 996 374 947 405 901 573 2844 1691 948 422 11:15 314 984 387 901 376 895 439 2780 1516 926 379 ' 11:30 326 984 346 921 357 906 326 2811 1355 937 338 11:45 272 1005 273 1028 330 989 272 3022 1147 1007 286 12:00 205 1099 223 997 279 1068 205 3164 912 1054 228 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' TOTALS 35365 72981 68427 73581 6 0 y 0 250360 673711 AM Times 7:45 7:45 8:0:0 AM Peaks 4906 4669 44270 8 36 o4-Q ? 71v16-3 PM Times 17:00 1786 16:45 1590 ?A'?,o / 7 71 ? 6 9 7 PM Peaks 5590 5 5786 5444 5 5590 f'? "^- 3 -4-1 O 0- - 70l ? 6' 3 6.671 6.07q 0,076 to - 0,a7? ©? = 5,7 5" 6 s? - z A-5 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT TIME MON TUE WED 31 1 2 Lane 1 am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------- 00:15 133 588 156 627 00:30 111 601 127 622 00:45 122 588 128 506 01:00 85 638 105 559 01:15 91 663 92 570 01:30 76 632 76 561 01:45 65 563 87 639 02:00 61 642 57 557 02:15 58 681 69 631 02:30 64 576 67 637 02:45 384 48 689 66 610 03:00 547 33 662 55 648 03:15 639 41 619 45 673 03:30 682 45 698 60 573 03:45 611 42 671 31 625 04:00 670 31 754 38 768 04:15 750 27 866 30 734 04:30 693 42 814 36 723 04:45 742 32 732 41 750 05:00 774 45 831 34 844 05:15 889 29 876 56 45 07 05:30 775 57 827 76 [853 05:45 789 67 833 77 06:00 847 95 847 97 71 06:15 825 137 869 125 818 06:30 719 151 836 165 799 06:45 746 222 823 213 733 07:00 792 299 798 283 771 07:15 590 320 603 330 627 07:30 590 341 631 340 544 07:45 489 407 546 409 569 08:00 484 448 560 432 526 08:15 491 530 461 492 485 08:30 483 488 460 521 468 08:45 458 541 420 533 435 09:00 441 502 442 467 405 09:15 334 589 305 586 441 09:30 376 498 333 481 414 09:45 315 459 357 474 383 10:00 339 453 354 537 307 10:15 286 520 267 517 319 10:30 266 523 280 530 331 10:45 242 493 260 507 304 11.00 213 496 245 497 257 11:15 186 528 267 531 269 11:30 197 544 263 544 243 11:45 184 505 192 527 232 12:00 116 529 155 566 175 ----------------------------------------- TOTALS 19954 39641 39401 AM Times 8:45 11:15 AM Peaks 2130 2168 PM Times 17:15 17:45 17:15 PM Peaks 3300 3385 3376 THU 3 am pm 173 672 163 622 148 635 123 657 112 672 90 621 72 590 72 677 79 663 74 567 59 621 43 685 46 649 38 674 48 676 60 744 39 769 35 788 53 784 44 827 45 900 55 818 69 834 96 8 140 871 167 852 194 815 282 741 336 711 380 599 386 589 450 521 516 507 473 551 505 460 553 492 590 457 513 397 439 438 541 368 461 360 543 328 529 329 476 270 520 305 528 252 533 211 597 178 41095 11:15 2178 17:45 3417 Page: 1 File: 19sunset.prn User: Direction: NORTH FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------- 202 664 1887 166 629 142 543 1845 135 615 147 545 1729 136 576 114 427 1854 106 618 104 399 1905 99 635 106 348 1814 87 604 88 312 1792 78 597 77 267 1876 66 625 74 280 1975 70 658 105 310 1780 77 593 74 247 2304 61 576 68 199 2542 49 635 53 185 2580 46 645 42 185 2627 46 656 56 177 2583 44 645 50 179 2936 44 734 45 141 3119 35 779 47 160 3018 40 754 48 174 3008 43 752 58 181 3276 45 819 52 182 3510 45 877 62 250 3227 62 806 83 296 3309 74 827 95 383 3425 95 856 132 534 3383 133 845 157 640 3206 160 801 191 820 3117 205 779 327 1191 3102 297 775 328 1314 2531 328 632 351 1412 2364 353 591 409 1611 2193 402 548 440 1770 2091 442 522 514 2052 1944 513 486 474 1956 1962 489 490 535 2114 1773 528 443 515 2037 1780 509 445 9 1774 1537 443 384 0 1492 1520 373 380 1372 1493 457 373 1531 1368 510 342 1498 1232 499 308 1596 1205 532 301 1529 1135 509 283 1469 985 489 246 1579 1027 526 256 1616 955 538 238 1565 819 521 204 1692 624 564 156 ---------------------------------------------------- 6374 0 0 146465 39408 8:15 2038 A-9 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT TIME MON TUE WED THU FRI 31 1 2 3 Lane 2 am pm am pm am pm am pm am ------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 2 File: 19sunset.prn User: Direction: SOUTH SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------- 00:15 66 433 62 414 84 443 94 306 1290 76 430 00:30 50 462 49 363 63 423 79 241 1248 60 416 00:45 55 371 58 341 69 415 68 250 1127 62 375 01:00 47 394 49 393 53 529 44 193 1316 48 938 01:15 32 485 45 411 58 459 42 177 1355 44 451 01:30 40 428 30 410 37 468 49 156 1306 39 435 01:45 36 394 42 424 46 438 53 177 1256 44 418 ' 02:00 33 441 37 409 40 505 44 154 1355 38 451 02:15 32 410 30 425 38 438 42 142 1273 35 424 02:30 25 405 26 418 24 408 44 119 1231 29 410 02:45 339 24 455 18 410 40 500 38 120 1704 30 426 03:00 435 18 441 24 418 24 471 28 94 1765 23 441 03:15 396 17 431 17 436 25 426 25 84 1689 21 422 03:30 398 29 496 15 410 31 452 24 99 1756 24 439 03:45 382 26 402 30 412 35 429 45 136 1625 34 406 ' 04:00 431 35 457 30 466 24 465 33 122 1819 30 454 04:15 455 40 443 28 464 25 508 37 130 1870 32 467 04:30 488 36 446 33 451 30 465 30 129 1850 32 462 04:45 381 40 438 44 424 57 496 43 184 1739 46 434 05:00 405 88 429 82 480 78 4 82 330 1752 82 438 ' 05:15 433 75 430 73 459 76 509 71 295 1831 73 457 05:30 476 109 529 103 477 111 559 101 424 2041 106 510 05:45 452 159 491 159 424 167 495 156 641 1862 160 465 06:00 380 271 421 253 486 253 436 245 1022 1723 255 430 ' 06:15 424 231 467 281 434 283 482 263 1058 1807 264 451 06:30 416 395 454 342 438 356 472 305 1398 1780 349 445 06:45 330 477 382 451 385 437 370 461 1826 1467 456 366 07:00 288 562 325 548 389 582 367 552 2244 1369 561 342 07:15 331 572 310 540 372 612 329 504 2228 1342 557 335 ' 07:30 315 665 356 672 325 649 391 624 2610 1387 652 346 07:45 299 679 277 660 337 683 329 706 2728 1242 682 310 08:00 244 647 298 711 286 732 276 705 2795 1104 698 276 08:15 236 638 225 670 258 743 301 667 2718 1020 679 255 08:30 259 643 244 673 284 648 304 634 2598 1091 649 272 08:45 234 563 243 626 242 582 346 626 2397 1065 599 266 09:00 260 526 247 571 258 552 277 536 2185 1042 546 260 09:15 235 501 197 512 299 566 308 1 1580 1039 395 259 09:30 289 446 257 457 290 450 313 0 1353 1149 338 287 09:45 254 417 213 421 271 433, 250 1271 988 423 247 10:00 199 385 225 347 208 412 260 1144 892 381 223 10:15 177 415 168 395 215 400 220 1210 780 403 195 10:30 150 414 179 365 192 423 199 1202 720 400 180 10:45 131 421 133 388 166 382 173 1191 603 397 150 11:00 142 390 140 385 168 393 150 1168 600 389 150 11:15 106 409 108 395 132 419 166 1223 512 407 128 11:30 102 357 128 415 142 407 166 1179 538 393 134 11:45 84 366 104 382 116 378 132 1126 436 375 109 ' 12:00 70 427 92 418 106 456 86 1301 354 433 88 ---------- TOTALS ---------------------- 11426 29233 ----------- 29500 -------------------------------- 31308 8101 0 ' AM Times 7:30 7:45 7:30 7:45 AM Peaks 2629 2714 2807 2712 PM Times PM Peaks 17:00 17:30 1766 17:15 16:45 T 1908 1846 2002 ---------------------------- 0 109568 29422 3376 /9og 5748?q- W 3376 1446 fazes=.6' 3 lF?i9 s4 ii =-43 ?_ a 491 A-rD Florida Design Consultants Inc ' WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/31/00 Site Reference: PARK PLACE File: 19sunset.prn Site ID: 172-07 User: Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT Direction: ROAD TOTAL TIME MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 31 1 2 3 Lane 3 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00:15 199 1021 218 1041 257 1115 296 970 3177 242 1059 ' 00:30 161 1063 176 985 226 1045 221 784 3093 196 1031 00:45 177 959 186 847 217 1050 215 795 2856 198 952 01:00 132 1032 154 952 176 1186 158 620 3170 155 1056 01:15 123 1148 137 981 170 1131 146 576 3260 144 1086 01:30 116 1060 106 971 127 1089 155 504 3120 126 1040 01:45 101 957 129 1063 118 1028 141 489 3048 122 1016 02:00 94 1083 94 966 112 1182 121 421 3231 105 1077 02:15 90 1091 99 1056 117 1101 116 422 3248 105 1082 02:30 89 981 93 1055 98 975 149 429 3011 107 1003 02:45 723 72 1144 84 1020 99 1121 112 367 4008 91 1002 03:00 982 51 1103 79 1066 67 1156 96 293 4307 73 1076 03:15 1035 58 1050 62 1109 71 1075 78 269 4269 67 1067 03:30 1080 74 1194 75 983 69 1126 66 284 4383 71 1095 03:45 993 68 1073 61 1037 83 1105 101 313 4208 78 1052 04:00 1101 66 1211 68 1234 84 1209 83 301 4755 75 1188 04:15 1205 67 1309 58 1198 64 1277 82 271 4989 67 1247 04:30 1181 78 1260 69 1174 65 1253 77 289 4868 72 1217 04:45 1123 72 1170 85 1174 110 1280 91 358 4747 89 1186 ' 05:00 1179 133 1260 116 1324 122 1265 140 511 5028 127 1257 05:15 1322 109 130 129 309 121 409 123 477 5391 119 1335 05:30 1251 166 356 179 1284 166 U29 163 674 5268 168 1317 05:45 1241 226 1324 236 1277 236 239 937 5171 234 1292 06:00 1227 366 1268 350 1357 399 340 1905 5148 351 1287 06:15 1249 368 1??61 406 1252 423 1353 395 1592 5190 398 1297 ' 0 6:30 1135 546 1290 507 1237 523 1324 462 2038 4986 509 1246 06:45 1076 699 1205 664 1118 631 1185 652 2646 4584 661 1146 07:00 1080 861 1123 831 1160 864 1108 879 3435 4471 858 1117 07:15 921 892 913 870 999 948 1040 832 3542 3873 885 968 07:30 905 1006 987 1012 869 1029 990 975 4022 3751 1005 937 07:45 788 1086 823 1069 906 1069 918 1115 4339 3435 1084 858 08:00 728 1095 858 1143 812 1182 797 1145 4565 3195 1141 798 ' 08:15 727 1168 686 1162 743 1259 808 1181 4770 2964 1192 741 08:30 742 1131 704 1194 752 1121 855 1108 4554 3053 1138 763 08:45 692 1104 663 1159 677 1087 806 1161 4511 2838 1127 709 09:00 701 1028 689 1038 663 1105 769 1051 4222 2822 1055 705 09:15 569 1090 502 1098 740 1156 765 10 3354 2576 838 644 ' 09:30 665 944 590 938 704 963 710 0 2845 2669 711 667 09:45 569 876 570 895 654 872 688 2643 2481 881 620 10:00 538 838 579 884 515 953 628 2675 2260 891 565 10:15 463 935 435 912 534 861 580 2708 2012 902 503 ' 10:30 416 937 459 895 523 966 527 2798 1925 932 481 10:45 373 914 393 895 470 911 502 2720 1738 906 434 11:00 355 886 385 882 425 869 420 2637 1585 879 396 11:15 292 937 375 926 401 939 471 2802 1539 934 384 11:30 299 901 391 959 385 935 418 2795 1493 931 373 ' 11:45 268 871 296 909 348 911 343 2691 1255 897 313 12:00 186 956 247 984 281 1053 264 2993 978 997 244 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 31380 68874 68901 72403 14475 0 0 256033 68863 AM Times 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 3 ?Gy /?? /?? 70, os 9 AM Peaks 4498 4658 4649 4595 4-A A7-= PM Times 17:15 17:30 17:15 17:15 _ p PM Peaks 5041 5284 5222 5411 [, 3f6 0.077 0.076 0.o 75" r .a76 0 ' /11/'o o O 82 o. 93 o - 516a -3638 ?B D ?y? S? Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: DREW ST, E. OF HAMPT TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 1 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 27 111 00:30 25 144 00:45 11 119 01:00 11 121 01:15 19 127 01:30 13 119 01:45 19 107 02:00 12 110 02:15 36 15 116 02:30 95 10 101 02:45 106 4 123 03:00 95 10 145 03:15 122 8 136 03:30 117 4 125 03:45 131 7 106 04:00 157 9 173 04:15 136 3 155 04:30 125 4 141 04:45 152 8 164 05:00 150 5 161 05:15 132 8 159 05:30 161 13 191 05:45 170 18 176 06:00 187 18 205 06:15 176 40 190 06:30 170 34 167 06:45 153 68 160 07:00 132 100 133 07:15 111 100 122 07:30 116 98 126 07:45 104 130 124 08:00 102 109 115 08:15 70 117 92 08:30 80 114 92 08:45 64 128 86 09:00 87 111 80 09:15 74 99 99 09:30 85 95 89 09:45 92 102 62 10:00 64 103 70 10:15 47 88 60 10:30 64 72 54 10:45 41 89 59 11:00 42 106 29 11:15 58 109 47 11:30 58 89 48 11:45 33 115 51 12:00 30 111 27 ------------------------------- TOTALS 4125 8125 AM Times 7:45 AM Peaks 470 PM Times 17:45 17:30 PM Peaks 703 762 Flor ON WED 26 am pm 35 98 30 130 26 112 13 101 24 126 11 123 16 121 13 109 12 122 12 99 14 107 14 122 6 131 6 106 6 125 7 194 5 155 6 155 4 163 10 182 6 145 15 169 22 199 23 200 35 192 45 186 67 171 86 128 81 129 102 148 139 145 136 132 149 98 145 102 119 93 110 112 106 92 97 106 101 72 85 91 80 64 81 61 107 61 91 45 107 44 94 61 108 41 106 44 ------------ 8425 7:45 569 17:45 777 A_I1 ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/24/00 File: \drewham.prn User: Direction: EAST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------------------------- 28 97 39 125 129 431 32 107 27 137 29 163 111 574 27 143 20 119 28 102 85 452 21 113 22 116 27 103 73 441 18 110 19 117 27 24 89 394 22 98 13 139 18 11 55 392 13 98 14 122 15 14 64 364 16 91 13 118 12 4 50 341 12 85 16 108 16 14 59 396 14 79 11 120 17 12 50 427 12 85 7 128 12 24 37 488 9 97 10 130 4 5 38 497 9 99 12 143 11 0 37 532 9 106 8 126 12 0 30 474 7 94 7 137 10 30 499 7 124 2 164 2 20 688 5 172 7 153 10 25 599 6 149 12 151 10 32 572 8 143 2 140 6 20 619 5 154 12 172 8 35 665 8 166 6 1 10 30 605 7 151 13 169 9 50 690 12 172 13 189 14 67 734 16 183 24 189 30 95 781 23 195 42 169 28 145 727 36 181 38 187 45 162 710 40 177 70 161 70 275 645 68 161 92 134 68 346 527 86 131 94 128 112 387 490 96 122 117 136 103 420 526 105 131 121 137 126 516 510 129 127 138 126 119 502 475 125 118 118 124 124 508 384 127 96 145 106 139 543 380 135 95 124 91 123 494 334 123 83 96 110 149 466 389 116 97 109 92 154 468 357 117 89 96 117 128 416 397 104 99 109 101 137 449 327 112 81 84 73 103 375 298 93 74 91 66 115 374 237 93 59 90 78 86 329 257 82 64 85 61 109 390 222 97 55 87 55 113 397 171 99 42 102 57 113 431 206 107 51 101 60 112 396 227 99 56 90 47 102 415 172 103 43 123 55 125 465 156 116 39 --------------------------------------------------------------- 8504 3580 0 0 32759 8011 8:00 9:00 525 568 17:45 12:15 734 493 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: DREW ST, E. OF HAMPT TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 2 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 12 107 00:30 25 106 00:45 22 102 01:00 23 102 01:15 17 117 01:30 9 116 01:45 13 98 02:00 12 103 02:15 40 15 95 02:30 92 9 110 02:45 85 14 102 03:00 97 8 93 03:15 96 3 121 03:30 108 7 106 03:45 128 4 120 04:00 109 3 143 04:15 141 2 141 04:30 113 5 149 04:45 104 6 133 05:00 118 3 111 05:15 123 10 123 05:30 132 10 123 05:45 114 9 145 06:00 122 32 126 06:15 142 39 149 06:30 119 28 25 06:45 92 35 121 07:00 111 55 117 07:15 95 95 98 07:30 81 92 97 07:45 68 89 87 08:00 90 85 107 08:15 74 97 102 08:30 80 103 84 08:45 74 116 75 09:00 72 95 81 09:15 68 135 90 09:30 62 101 81 09:45 51 101 62 10:00 48 90 62 10:15 47 113 56 10:30 51 88 67 10:45 42 95 58 11:00 33 81 48 11:15 45 106 41 11:30 43 106 38 11:45 38 110 38 12:00 20 92 35 ------------------------------- TOTALS 3368 7131 AM Times 8:30 AM Peaks 449 Florida Design Consultants Inc DN WED 26 am pm 23 105 29 106 31 98 17 119 16 111 16 105 6 108 10 86 16 109 7 95 15 104 8 113 7 100 4 120 3 128 4 109 8 141 5 113 10 104 5 118 9 123 10 132 16 114 27 122 40 142 34 119 31 120 66 112 96 117 79 101 85 105 98 102 118 107 110 87 117 87 120 91 130 134 102 90 98 75 86 66 110 53 108 61 107 52 84 47 108 29 72 58 89 46 90 35 7199 8:30 477 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/24/00 File: \drewham.prn User: Direction: WEST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------------- 28 92 43 108 106 412 26 103 29 130 35 120 118 462 29 115 21 102 28 101 102 403 25 100 20 123 16 125 76 469 1.9 117 17 134 20 147 70 509 17 127 13 113 22 107 60 441 1.5 110 20 104 21 127 60 437 15 109 18 103 11 116 51 408 12 102 10 109 8 112 49 465 12 93 18 104 13 116 47 517 11 103 10 109 9 120 48 520 12 104 9 106 9 75 34 484 8 96 10 115 3 0 23 432 5 86 7 114 9 0 27 448 6 89 8 133 7 22 509 5 127 5 134 11 23 495 5 123 2 130 8 20 553 5 138 5 139 2 17 514 4 128 10 141 12 38 482 9 120 6 130 9 23 477 5 119 11 3 33 499 8 124 9 146 5 34 533 8 133 11 159 18 54 532 13 133 31 129 23 113 499 28 124 35 134 23 137 567 34 141 23 123 23 108 486 27 121 39 123 38 143 456 35 114 67 107 61 249 447 62 111 99 124 66 356 434 89 108 65 108 76 312 387 78 96 88 118 74 336 378 84 94 81 135 86 350 434 87 108 120 129 139 474 412 118 103 111 93 93 417 344 104 86 121 66 131 485 302 121 75 128 91 117 460 335 115 83 101 89 107 473 381 118 95 110 114 113 426 347 106 86 98 63 80 377 251 94 62 98 62 104 378 238 94 59 100 63 103 426 219 106 54 92 84 109 397 263 99 65 93 85 114 409 237 102 59 93 37 101 359 165 89 41 114 55 108 436 170 109 42 97 62 96 371 201 92 50 113 43 93 405 165 101 41 105 28 108 395 118 98 29 --------------------------------------------------------------- 7584 3882 0 0 29164 7110 8:15 8:15 480 480 PM Times 17:30 16:00 17:30 17:30 13:00 -IC7 R 1v & 7o-t- ' PM Peaks 510 566 510 568 506 -7- 76 Z S"er 3 i3os 1 (,V 777 It 97 714 SG ?r- /z = s P= .S8 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: DREW ST, E. OF HAMPT TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 3 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 39 218 00:30 50 250 00:45 33 221 01:00 34 223 01:15 36 244 01:30 22 235 01:45 32 205 02:00 24 213 02:15 76 30 211 02:30 187 19 211 02:45 191 18 225 03:00 192 18 238 03:15 218 11 257 03:30 225 11 231 03:45 259 11 226 04:00 266 12 316 04:15 277 5 296 04:30 238 9 290 04:45 256 14 297 05:00 268 8 272 05:15 255 18 2 05:30 293 23 314 05:45 284 27 321 06:00 309 50 331 06:15 318 79 339 06:30 289 62 292 06:45 245 103 281 07:00 243 155 250 07:15 206 195 220 07:30 197 190 223 07:45 172 219 211 08:00 192 194 222 08:15 144 214 194 08:30 160 217 176 08:45 138 244 161 09:00 159 206 161 09:15 142 234 189 09:30 147 196 170 09:45 143 203 124 10:00 112 193 132 10:15 94 201 116 10:30 115 160 121 10:45 83 184 117 11:00 75 187 77 11:15 103 215 88 11:30 101 195 86 11:45 71 225 89 12:00 50 203 62 ------------------------------- TOTALS 7493 15256 AM Times 8:30 AM Peaks 901 PM Times 17:30 17:30 PM Peaks 1204 1305 Floi ON WED 26 am pm 58 203 59 236 57 210 30 220 40 237 27 228 22 229 23 195 28 231 19 194 29 211 22 235 13 231 10 226 9 253 11 303 13 296 11 268 14 267 15 300 15 268 25 301 38 313 50 322 75 334 79 305 98 291 152 240 177 246 181 249 224 250 234 234 267 205 255 189 236 180 230 203 236 226 199 196 199 147 171 157 190 117 189 122 214 113 175 92 215 73 166 119 197 87 196 79 15624 8:00 992 17:45 1274 A\ ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/24/00 File: \drewham.prn User: Direction: ROAD TOTAL THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------ 56 189 82 233 235 843 58 210 56 267 64 283 229 1036 57 259 41 221 56 203 187 855 46 213 42 239 43 228 149 910 37 227 36 251 47 171 159 903 39 225 26 252 40 118 115 833 28 208 34 226 36 141 124 801 31 200 31 221 23 120 101 749 25 187 26 217 24 126 108 861 27 172 29 224 30 128 97 944 24 188 17 237 21 144 85 1008 21 201 19 236 13 80 72 981 18 196 22 258 14 0 60 964 15 192 15 240 21 0 57 922 14 184 15 270 17 52 1008 13 252 7 298 13 43 1183 10 295 9 283 18 45 1152 11 288 17 290 12 49 1086 12 271 12 281 18 58 1101 14 275 18 302 17 58 1142 14 285 17 299 13 63 1104 15 276 22 315 14 84 1223 21 305 24 348 32 121 1266 30 316 55 318 53 208 1280 52 320 77 303 51 282 1294 70 323 61 310 68 270 1196 67 299 109 284 108 418 1101 104 275 159 241 129 595 974 148 243 193 252 178 743 924 185 231 182 244 179 732 913 183 228 209 255 200 852 888 213 222 219 261 205 852 909 213 227 238 253 263 982 796 245 199 256 199 232 960 724 240 181 245 157 254 979 636 244 159 224 201 266 926 724 231 181 210 181 261 941 738 235 184 206 231 241 842 744 210 186 207 164 217 826 578 206 144 182 135 207 753 536 188 134 191 129 218 800 456 200 114 182 162 195 726 520 181 130 178 146 223 799 459 199 114 180 92 214 756 336 189 84 216 112 221 867 376 216 94 198 122 208 767 428 191 107 203 90 195 820 337 205 84 228 83 233 860 274 215 68 ----------------------------------------------------------- 16088 7462 0 0 61923, 15166 //C 8963 1022 3 Or, Y Ave- ?e?? t:a /5; iUi? 11284 12947 4--A P7 = 15j,i ?S /02 /S', j o, 9 3 1 4760 ? 7 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF F TIME MON TUE 31 1 Lane 1 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 75 452 00:30 62 470 00:45 68 442 01:00 40 412 01:15 62 410 01:30 40 421 01:45 47 421 02:00 27 446 02:15 363 22 362 02:30 370 32 451 02:45 401 32 404 03:00 518 20 437 03:15 465 28 454 03:30 431 30 412 03:45 391 17 471 04:00 444 17 519 04:15 392 36 433 04:30 447 24 503 04:45 434 32 423 05:00 456 41 495 05:15 412 38 19 05:30 498 48 545 05:45 436 83 428 06:00 428 118 990 06:15 373 132 416 06:30 433 151 430 06:45 365 195 399 07:00 379 298 394 07:15 305 316 315 07:30 283 321 338 07:45 289 427 291 08:00 263 439 298 08:15 249 441 270 08:30 255 391 247 08:45 293 429 271 09:00 287 376 289 09:15 238 374 240 09:30 242 352 239 09:45 242 360 202 10:00 202 359 170 10:15 168 354 165 10:30 158 387 175 10:45 163 365 145 11:00 156 377 164 11:15 130 353 104 11:30 168 388 113 11:45 93 385 100 12:00 83 389 114 ------------------------------ TOTALS 12703 26007 AM Times 8:00 AM Peaks 1700 PM Times 14:45 15:45 PM Peaks 1815 1926 Flo IERCULES WED 2 am pm 72 408 70 417 63 395 71 463 54 440 50 430 49 372 43 400 52 407 39 438 36 443 29 404 31 402 23 386 23 424 23 461 20 468 27 433 24 483 29 457 44 468 47 438 72 118 428 138 450 163 445 198 437 309 368 291 332 338 338 376 297 418 276 428 253 407 281 433 294 379 275 403 243 354 187 366 241 359 215 353 181 361 167 414 163 411 141 383 131 395 160 362 113 433 114 26041 8:00 1686 17:00 1856 A 14r =ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/31/00 File: tbhercul.prn User: Direction: EAST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------- 119 449 113 379 1309 94 436 105 432 89 326 1319 81 439 67 464 91 289 1301 72 433 82 431 71 264 1306 66 435 59 412 77 252 1262 63 420 49 419 71 210 1270 52 423 39 419 68 203 1212 50 404 37 414 49 156 1260 39 420 45 429 52 171 1561 42 390 48 413 49 168 1672 42 418 31 413 45 144 1661 36 415 12 418 32 93 1777 23 444 21 486 24 104 1807 26 451 32 431 33 118 1660 29 415 29 449 24 93 1735 23 433 17 491 22 79 1915 19 478 20 427 29 105 1720 26 430 24 499 34 109 1882 27 470 25 464 32 113 1804 28 451 39 473 37 146 1881 36 470 42 483 53 177 1782 44 445 62 509 40 197 1990 49 497 72 488 98 325 1845 81 461 124 51 102 462 1863 115 465 127 433 139 536 1672 134 418 179 446 160 653 1754 163 438 191 409 212 796 1610 199 402 297 378 294 1198 1519 299 379 277 313 296 1180 1265 295 316 339 329 294 1292 1288 323 322 427 290 372 1602 1167 400 291 434 336 415 1706 1173 426 293 459 258 460 1788 1030 447 257 401 289 398 1597 1072 399 268 385 258 400 1647 1116 411 279 399 296 385 1539 1147 384 286 393 282 351 1521 1003 380 250 369 223 166 1241 891 310 222 358 267 0 1084 952 271 238 371 195 1089 782 363 195 356 212 1063 726 354 181 375 179 1123 679 374 169 383 221 1162 692 387 173 385 167 1173 628 391 157 388 173 1124 538 374 134 427 160 1210 601 403 150 418 161 1165 467 388 116 449 106 1271 417 423 104 ------------------------------------------------------------ 26998 5677 0 0 97426 26042 7:45 8:00 1721 1673 17:15 1997 1 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF F TIME MON TUE 31 1 Lane 2 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 91 426 00:30 77 409 00:45 74 479 01:00 82 441 01:15 73 463 01:30 67 470 01:45 58 437 02:00 52 399 02:15 360 38 433 02:30 380 26 399 ' 02:45 365 33 406 03:00 393 34 446 03:15 381 25 425 03:30 394 18 463 ' 03:45 370 21 424 04:00 401 21 387 04:15 402 23 412 04:30 423 28 422 04:45 322 19 422 05:00 435 33 467 05:15 426 37 408 05:30 459 27 441 05:45 419 43 442 06:00 460 66 487 06:15 414 94 411 06:30 416 117 482 06:45 426 138 421 07:00 397 196 467 ' 07:15 425 237 413 07:30 365 238 316 07:45 321 265 300 08:00 317 355 353 ' 08:15 361 373 336 08:30 313 324 321 08:45 281 384 298 09:00 307 408 270 09:15 334 410 238 ' 09:30 279 324 230 09:45 273 362 267 10:00 252 352 231 10:15 238 370 233 ' 10:30 231 330 220 10:45 194 392 181 11:00 155 370 168 11:15 132 392 164 ' 11:30 144 400 185 11:45 111 387 147 12:00 110 414 127 ------------------------------- TOTALS 13186 25885 AM Times 11:15 AM Peaks 1593 PM Times 17:15 12:45 PM Peaks 1764 1853 1 Floi ERCULES WED 2 am__pm ----------- 108 381 96 381 103 364 71 338 75 331 67 340 61 454 53 444 58 408 42 360 37 397 40 382 29 394 23 413 22 445 26 432 15 448 24 402 25 425 30 430 31 451 35 930 60 67 447 82 490 112 445 143 467 226 397 257 397 236 356 260 324 356 331 365 331 370 285 361 298 355 293 400 289 325 325 360 117 363 252 381 238 368 231 395 194 360 155 415 132 371 144 411 111 403 110 25344 11:15 1600 18:00 1849 ? -f5 ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/31/00 File: tbhercul.prn User: Direction: WEST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------ 100 404 147 446 1211 111 403 87 395 123 383 1185 95 395 89 422 118 384 1265 96 421 77 390 96 326 1169 81 389 74 397 89 311 1191 77 397 68 405 71 273 1215 68 405 60 446 74 253 1337 63 445 52 422 57 214 1265 53 421 48 421 60 204 1622 51 405 34 380 58 160 1519 40 379 35 365 58 163 1533 40 383 37 393 33 144 1614 36 403 27 381 49 130 1581 32 395 21 394 31 93 1664 23 416 21 370 37 101 1609 25 402 24 401 29 100 1621 25 405 19 402 35 92 1664 23 416 26 423 42 120 1670 30 417 22 322 39 105 1491 26 372 32 435 24 119 1767 29 441 34 426 39 141 1711 35 427 31 459 47 140 1789 35 447 52 419 61 216 1742 54 435 66 46 87 286 1854 71 463 88 414 91 355 1729 88 432 115 416 111 455 1759 113 439 141 426 159 581 1740 145 435 211 445 204 837 1706 209 426 247 367 239 980 1602 245 400 237 346 224 935 1383 233 345 263 327 295 1083 1272 270 318 355 343 357 1423 1344 355 336 369 350 364 1471 1378 367 344 347 315 375 1416 1234 354 308 373 311 352 1470 1188 367 297 382 310 376 1521 1180 380 295 405 336 355 1570 1197 392 299 324 316 183 1156 1150 289 287 361 307 0 1083 964 270 241 358 255 1073 990 357 247 376 279 1127 988 375 247 349 258 1047 940 349 235 394 224 1181 793 393 198 365 249 1095 727 365 181 404 192 1211 620 403 155 386 171 1157 644 385 161 399 143 1197 512 399 128 409 137 1226 484 408 121 ------------------------------------------------------------ 25763 5189 0 0 95367 25487 11:15 8:15 1598 1467 17:15 % 1764 1*92- y/ /6/6 ?^! ? -?O p ??6Q %,• ? 36Co d , So 379 . s 3 0sc. S'2- ?` s C4J Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 Page: 3 Site Reference: PARK PLACE File: tbhercul.prn ' Site ID: 172-07 User: Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF HERCULES Direction: ROAD TOTAL TIME MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 31 1 2 3 4 ' Lane 3 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00:15 00:30 00:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 723 0230 750 0245 766 03:00 911 03:15 846 03:30 825 03:45 761 04:00 845 04:15 794 04:30 870 04:45 756 05:00 891 05:15 838 05:30 957 05:45 855 06:00 888 06:15 787 06:30 849 06:45 791 07:00 776 07:15 730 07:30 648 07:45 610 08:00 580 08:15 610 08:30 568 08:45 574 09:00 594 09:15 572 09:30 521 09:45 515 10:00 454 10:15 406 10:30 389 10:45 357 11:00 311 11:15 262 11:30 312 11:45 204 12:00 193 ------------------- TOTALS 25889 AM Times AM Peaks 166 878 139 879 142 921 122 853 135 873 107 891 105 858 79 845 60 795 58 850 65 810 54 883 53 879 48 875 38 895 38 906 59 845 52 925 51 845 74 962 75 827 75 986 126 870 184 977 226 827 268 912 333 820 494 861 553 728 559 654 692 591 794 651 814 606 715 568 813 569 784 559 784 478 676 469 722 469 711 401 724 398 717 395 757 326 747 332 745 268 788 298 772 247 803 241 51892 8:00 3136 180 789 166 798 166 759 142 801 129 771 117 770 110 826 96 844 110 815 81 798 73 840 69 786 60 796 46 799 45 869 49 893 35 916 51 835 49 908 59 887 75 919 82 868 132 955 185 875 220 940 275 890 341 904 535 765 548 729 574 694 636 621 774 607 793 584 777 566 794 592 734 568 803 532 679 512 726 358 722 467 734 419 729 398 809 357 771 296 798 263 766 304 773 224 836 224 51385 11:15 3173 219 853 192 827 156 886 159 821 133 809 117 824 99 865 89 836 93 850 82 793 66 778 49 811 48 867 53 825 50 819 41 892 39 829 50 922 47 786 71 908 76 909 93 968 124 907 190 215 847 294 862 332 835 508 823 524 680 576 675 690 617 789 679 828 608 748 604 758 569 781 606 798 618 693 539 719 574 729 450 732 491 724 437 777 445 750 416 792 365 813 331 817 304 858 243 52761 11:15 3280 260 825 2520 212 709 2504 209 673 2566 167 590 2475 166 563 2453 142 483 2485 142 456 2549 106 370 2525 112 375 3183 107 328 3191 103 307 3194 65 237 3391 73 234 3388 64 211 3324 61 194 3344 51 179 3536 64 197 3384 76 229 3552 71 218 3295 61 265 3648 92 318 3493 87 337 3779 159 541 3587 189 748 3717 230 891 3401 271 1108 3513 371 1377 3350 498 2035 3225 535 2160 2867 518 2227 2671 667 2685 2439 772 3129 2517 824 3259 2408 773 3013 2306 752 3117 2304 761 3060 2327 706 3091 2200 349 2397 2041 0 2167 1916 2162 1772 2190 1714 2170 1619 2343 1485 2268 1355 2335 1158 2367 1245 2362 979 2497 901 ------------------------------------- 10866 0 0 192793 121 3 4ve 3121 PM Times 17:00 17:15 17:45 17:15 PM Peaks 3541 3660 3660 3761 Plh 0.07/ 0,07/ 0.07/ 206 840 177 834 168 855 147 825 140 817 120 828 114 849 92 841 93 795 82 797 76 798 59 847 58 847 52 831 48 836 44 884 49 846 57 888 54 823 66 912 79 873 84 944 135 896 187 929 222 850 277 878 344 837 508 806 540 716 556 667 671 609 782 629 814 602 753 576 779 576 765 581 772 550 599 510 541 479 720 443 730 428 723 404 781 371 756 338 778 289 789 311 787 244 832 225 51560 g.21 013 g/i 9 p2 07 0 074 Vfc 100 0.93 A X02, i Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF I TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 1 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 67 376 00:30 58 393 00:45 41 358 01:00 41 369 01:15 36 393 01:30 36 373 01:45 21 352 02:00 21 365 02:15 21 363 02:30 25 343 02:45 242 25 341 03:00 371 25 384 03:15 415 8 356 03:30 363 21 350 03:45 369 17 322 04:00 371 15 382 04:15 380 21 376 04:30 335 34 408 04:45 371 21 352 05:00 339 45 352 05:15 404 43 356 05:30 371 54 445 05:45 397 58 393 06:00 380 123 402 06:15 367 162 395 06:30 348 175 335 06:45 330 214 319 07:00 268 298 309 07:15 220 363 285 07:30 224 356 201 07:45 220 408 257 08:00 203 441 209 08:15 196 473 196 08:30 205 447 203 08:45 144 458 170 09:00 179 371 183 09:15 131 358 155 09:30 168 300 185 09:45 134 319 188 10:00 127 257 142 10:15 140 298 131 10:30 108 242 114 10.45 123 300 131 11:00 112 289 95 11:15 86 270 118 11:30 75 246 127 11:45 67 309 97 12:00 82 343 60 ------------------------------- iTOTALS 9365 22083 i AM M Times 8:00 AM Peaks 1819 PM Times 17:15 17:30 PM Peaks 1552 1635 Floi fS 19 WED 26 am pm ----------- 71 384 45 399 36 384 49 389 49 378 23 361 25 395 30 298 34 380 45 306 30 341 12 410 19 460 15 492 15 527 21 436 25 527 17 505 23 469 36 518 45 n14 58 73 127 157 151 512 192 408 309 252 330 246 322 207 404 211 415 211 432 188 425 185 378 181 358 159 371 144 283 170 341 179 332 164 319 147 287 116 356 136 348 101 326 86 291 90 319 71 406 69 ------------ 24103 7:45 1676 17:15 2222 A? 1-7 ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User: Direction: EAST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------ 64 291 75 315 277 1366 69 341 58 263 73 302 234 1357 58 339 58 239 49 296 184 1277 46 319 36 289 54 294 180 1341 45 335 36 274 49 242 170 1287 42 321 38 242 36 129 133 1105 33 276 28 376 25 0 99 1123 24 280 23 332 28 0 102 995 25 248 36 371 21 0 112 1114 28 278 32 326 30 0 132 975 33 243 17 343 25 0 97 1267 24 253 12 371 25 0 74 1536 18 307 12 415 21 4 60 1650 15 330 17 363 8 0 61 1568 15 313 10 369 12 0 54 1587 13 317 8 371 19 63 1560 15 390 15 380 17 78 1663 19 415 15 335 21 87 1583 21 395 25 371 17 86 1563 21 390 25 339 17 123 1548 30 387 34 404 36 158 1697 39 424 41 371 45 198 1723 49 430 79 397 82 292 1733 73 433 114 376 110 474 1765 118 441 164 224 136 619 1500 154 375 149 263 155 630 1458 157 364 198 250 179 783 1307 195 326 235 218 239 1081 1047 270 261 268 229 255 1216 980 304 245 294 224 289 1261 856 315 214 324 203 335 1471 891 367 222 356 192 313 1525 815 381 203 386 198 348 1639 778 409 194 332 172 354 1558 765 389 191 356 140 324 1516 635 379 158 294 168 289 1312 689 328 172 285 147 306 1320 577 330 144 246 177 272 1101 700 275 175 268 188 250 1178 689 294 172 250 168 270 1109 601 277 150 224 144 242 1083 562 270 140 214 157 192 935 495 233 123 216 168 237 1109 558 277 139 216 147 244 1097 455 274 113 231 134 257 1084 424 271 106 252 95 250 1039 387 259 96 205 125 270 1103 360 275 90 281 92 261 1291 303 322 75 ------------------------------------------------------ 19508 8744 0 0 83803 20531 8:00 7:45 1430 1350 17:15 12:15 1548 1207 l I Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF I TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 2 am pm am pm - 00:15 103--378- 00: 3 0 60 412 00:45 82 389 01:00 60 458 01:15 45 425 01:30 41 404 01:45 38 393 I 02:00 49 466 02:15 25 436 02:30 17 367 02:45 289 28 432 03:00 397 21 434 I 03:15 367 19 380 03:30 371 10 404 03:45 406 25 464 04:00 380 15 415 04:15 438 28 490 I 04:30 417 12 460 04:45 438 17 441 05:00 508 23 443 05:15 484 19 495 I 05:30 523 25 490 05:45 425 34 538 06:00 475 45 510 06:15 529 73 5 06:30 533 110 510 06:45 471 121 505 07:00 393 224 464 07:15 404 246 384 07:30 326 274 365 07:45 270 311 371 1 08:00 283 378 311 08:15 242 389 343 08:30 214 378 246 08:45 237 369 274 09:00 196 384 270 l 09:15 190 430 237 I 09:30 222 425 233 09:45 175 339 239 10:00 149 371 216 10:15 147 367 183 10:30 155 298 151 10:45 129 302 185 11:00 123 337 168 11:15 103 373 162 I 11:30 108 350 131 11:45 112 352 164 12:00 114 371 125 ------------------------------• TALS 11743 25688 Times 8:45 AM Peaks 1608 M Times 18:00 17:45 M Peaks 2008 2072 Flor fS 19 WED 26 am pm ----------- 103 417 71 490 86 482 75 453 67 458 49 462 45 462 54 458 41 482 23 460 41 510 28 466 25 499 21 469 25 503 17 536 25 533 19 557. 8 607 21 600 19 642 30 661 43 726 58 652 82 691 97 667 118 538 226 445 298 443 265 417 281 367 348 361 358 326 343 287 404 296 348 304 434 285 356 306 315 283 317 242 343 265 348 224 332 188 382 205 367 159 395 123 386 147 430 181 28902 11:15 1578 17:45 2736 A-ig ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User: Direction: WEST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------ 127 482 131 430 464 1707 116 426 95 460 101 490 327 1852 81 463 79 495 110 482 357 1848 89 462 90 520 90 469 315 1900 78 475 88 501 75 484 275 1868 68 467 56 469 77 527 223 1862 55 465 58 449 64 430 205 1734 51 433 58 399 58 479 219 1802 54 450 60 436 75 514 201 1868 50 467 38 441 47 445 125 1713 31 428 41 419 45 503 155 2153 38 430 30 441 36 490 115 2228 28 445 21 425 34 134 99 1805 24 361 32 380 30 0 93 1624 23 324 28 449 32 0 110 1822 27 364 21 441 28 81 1772 20 443 25 469 54 132 1930 33 482 12 453 19 62 1887 15 471 21 490 25 71 1976 17 494 25 4 5 21 90 2046 22 511 25 549 32 95 2170 23 542 30 518 36 121 2192 30 548 62 553 45 184 2242 46 560 54 2 58 215 2263 53 565 82 523 84 321 2257 80 564 95 516 110 412 2226 103 556 136 505 127 502 2019 125 504 211 518 192 853 1820 213 455 283 449 317 1144 1680 286 420 294 408 274 1107 1516 276 379 386 404 326 1304 1412 326 353 384 373 358 1468 1328 367 332 402 332 419 1568 1243 392 310 386 317 382 1489 1064 372 266 412 319 419 1604 1126 401. 281 408 274 415 1555 1044 388 261 419 289 447 1730 1001 432 250 380 257 341 1502 1018 375 254 371 237 369 1394 934 348 233 341 237 371 1400 844 350 211 376 201 380 1466 796 366 199 365 233 354 1365 763 341 190 397 155 363 1394 657 348 164 430 222 365 1514 718 378 179 436 172 421 1597 596 399 149 373 168 473 1591 530 397 132 419 142 408 1565 565 391 141 436 136 445 1682 556 420 139 ---------------------------------------------------------- 28145 15360 0 0 109838 26944 11:15 11:15 1664 1747 tj 17:15 12:45 --?'°- C / 2246 1962 Z-,DS2- 34 ?/ 2Z03 2730 ?? -.s5 i Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 (Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF i TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane- 3 am pm am pm ----------------------- 00:15 170 754 00:30 118 805 00:45 123 747 01:00 101 827 01:15 81 818 01:30 77 777 01:45 59 745 02:00 70 831 02:15 46 799 02:30 42 710 02:45 531 53 773 03:00 768 46 818 I 03:15 782 27 736 03:30 734 31 754 03:45 775 42 786 04:00 751 30 797 04:15 818 49 866 04:30 752 46 868 04:45 809 38 793 05:00 847 68 795 05:15 888 62 851 05:30 894 79 935 05:45 822 92 931 06:00 855 168 912 06:15 896 235 909 06:30 881 285 845 06:45 801 335 824 07:00 661 522 773 07:15 624 609 669 07:30 550 630 566 07:45 490 719 628 08:00 486 819 520 08:15 438 862 539 08:30 419 825 449 08:45 381 827 444 09:00 375 755 453 09:15 321 788 392 09:30 390 725 418 09:45 309 658 427 10:00 276 628 358 10:15 287 665 314 10:30 263 540 265 10:45 252 602 316 11:00 235 626 263 11:15 189 643 280 11:30 183 596 258 11:45 179 661 261 12:00 196 714 185 ------------------------------ E OTALS 21108 47771 Times 8:00 AM Peaks 3333 M Times 17:30 17:30 M Peaks 3467 3687 0 7Z- /i? - 19 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User- fS 19 Direction: ROAD TOTAL WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 26 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 174 801 191 773 206 745 741 3073 185 768 116 889 153 723 174 792 561 3209 140 802 122 866 137 734 159 778 541 3125 135 781 124 842 126 809 144 763 495 3241 123 810 116 836 124 775 124 726 445 3155 111 788 72 823 94 711 113 656 356 2967 89 741 70 857 66 825 89 430 304 2857 76 714 84 756 81 731 86 479 321 2797 80 699 75 862 96 807 96 514 313 2982 78 745 68 766 70 767 77 445 257 2688 64 672 71 851 58 762 70 503 252 3420 63 684 40 876 42 812 61 490 189 3764 47 752 44 959 33 840 55 138 159 3455 39 691 36 961 49 743 38 0 154 3192 38 638 40 1030 38 818 44 0 164 3409 41. 681 38 972 29 812 47 144 3332 36 833 50 1060 40 849 71 210 3593 52 898 36 1062 27 788 40 149 3470 37 867 31 1076 46 861 42 157 3539 39 884 57 1118 50 834 38 213 3594 53 898 64 n1205 59 953 68 253 3867 63 966 86 71 889 81 319 3915 79 978 116 141 950 127 476 3975 119 993 185 168 002 168 689 4028 172 1007 239 246 747 220 940 3757 235 939 248 1179 244 779 265 1042 3684 260 921 310 946 334 755 306 1285 3326 321 831 535 697 446 736 431 1934 2867 483 716 628 689 551 678 572 2360 2660 590 665 587 624 588 632 563 2368 2372 592 593 685 578 710 607 661 2775 2303 693 575 763 572 740 565 671 2993 2143 748 535 790 514 788 530 767 3207 2021 801 505 768 472 718 489 736 3047 1829 761 457 782 477 768 459 743 3120 1761 780 440 706 463 702 442 704 2867 1733 716 433 805 429 704 436 753 3050 1578 762 394 639 476 626 434 613 2603 1718 650 429 656 462 639 425 619 2572 1623 643 405 649 406 591 405 641 2509 1445 627 361 662 412 600 345 622 2549 1358 637 339 635 340 579 390 546 2300 1258 575 314 688 324 613 323 600 2503 1215 625 303 730 306 646 369 609 2611 1173 652 293 693 245 667 306 678 2681 1020 670 255 686 213 625 263 723 2630 917 657 229 705 218 624 267 678 2668 925 667 231 836 250 717 228 706 2973 859 743 214 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 53005 47653 24104 y0 0 193641 47514 I 3103 30014 2950 2 J Par /Tv& A-0 ! -f.7. ??V 17:30 17:15 12:15 ,( ? 4933 3794 3078 .lf?? G? /ov p3 e®®= ?,? HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60HERCX.hcs Page 1 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / HERCULES Analyst: RP Date: 8/23/00 ' E/W St: GULF TO BAY No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width ' RTOR Vol City/St: CLEARWATER Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK N/S St: HERCULES SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R I L T R 1 3 0 L TR 296 1992 132 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 0 L TR 104 1774 168 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 118 412 49 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All o ther areas Signal O perations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A A Thru A ' Right A A Right A Peds Peds WE Left A SB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 176 504 282 12.0 12.0 0 7 8 Green 13.0 51.0 10.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 ' All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summ ary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 269 1.18 0.575 152.3 F ' TR 2897 5038 0.79 0.575 14.0 B 30.9 C Westbound L 62 146 1.76 0.425 433.2 F ' TR 2133 5019 0.96 0.425 40.3 D 60.2 E Northbound L 91 439 1.44 0.208 296.7 F TR 726 3483 0.71 0.208 47.2 D 98.0 F Southbound L 258 0.75 0.333 42.9 D ITR 1116 3349 0.77 0.333 39.4 D 40.0 D Intersection Delay = 48.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60BELCHX.hcs Page 1 A-Z i ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / BELCHER City/St: CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 ' Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: GULF TO BAY N/S St: BELCHER SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' Ea stbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ' 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 LGConfig L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume 181 1855 181 188 1668 178 255 954 122 267 655 123 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1.2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A A t Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 54.0 21.0 35.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 ' All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 150.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 273 0.73 0.513 73.9 E ' TR 1806 5017 1.24 0.360 157.2 F 150.4 F Westbound L 273 0.74 0.513 74.8 E TR 1804 5012 1.10 0.360 99.1 F 96.9 F Northbound ' L 310 0.95 0.407 83.1 F TR 812 3479 1.52 0.233 299.3 F 257.9 F Southbound t L 310 0.92 0.407 95.5 F TR 806 345.5 1.03 0.233 96.4 F 96.1 F ' Intersection Delay = 148.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F I HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60OLDCX.hcs Page 1 A _ 2.2 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / OLD COACHMAN City/St. CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 ' Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: GULF TO BAY N/S St: OLD COACHMAN ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L TR L TR L TR Volume 93 2073 78 68 1885 401 65 65 35 119 165 84 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 33 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 7.0 72.0 34.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 166 0.59 0.646 28.1 C T 2816 5085 0.77 0.554 16.7 B 17.0 B ' R 877 1583 0.05 0.554 9.0 A Westbound L 166 0.43 0.646 18.8 B ' TR 2743 4952 0.88 0.554 20.5 C 20.5 C Northbound L 200 765 0.36 0.262 40.2 D TR 462 1765 0.24 0.262 38.1 D 38.9 D Southbound ' L 331 1265 0.38 0.262 40.1 D TR 463 1769 0.57 0.262 43.4 D 42.3 D Intersection Delay = 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.2 File:6019RX.hcs Page 1 A- Z3 ¦ HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / US 19 RAMPS City/St. CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK ¦ E/W St: GULF TO BAY (SR 60) N/S St: US 19 RAMPS ¦ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L Volume 275 1067 447 301 1714 438 439 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ¦ RTOR Vol 93 66 ¦ Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A NB Left A ¦ Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds ¦ WB Left A SB Left A Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 16.0 35.0 23.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ¦ All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ ¦ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 1 2 0 1 R L R 357 426 263 12.0 12.0 12.0 78 65 6 7 8 Approach Delay LOS ¦ Eastbound L 381 1770 0.78 0.215 57.8 E T 1995 5085 0.57 0.392 28.4 C 33.6 C ¦ R 621 1583 0.61 0.392 30.3 C Westbound L 477 1770 0.68 0.269 46.4 D ¦ T 2269 5085 0.81 0.446 28.7 C 30.1 C R 706 1583 0.57 0.446 23.5 C Northbound ¦ L 607 3433 0.76 0.177 56.5 E 81.6 F R 280 1583 1.05 0.177 121.0 F Southbound ¦ L 607 3433 0.74 0.177 55.4 E 57.1 E R 280 1583 0.74 0.177 60.9 E ¦ Intersection Delay = 41.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D ' HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60BENX.hcs Page 1 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter. SR 60 / BENNIGANS / MALL W. City/St. CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: MALL W. / BENNIGANS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound South L T R L T R I L T R L T No. Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L TR L TR L TR Volume 58 1629 163 18 2257 12 158 14 54 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Sig nal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A NB Left ' Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 82.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130 .0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 57 91 1.07 0.631 164.1 F TR 3164 5016 0.60 0.631 7.3 A Westbound L 110 174 0.17 0.631 10.7 B ' TR 3205 5081 0.76 0.631 9.6 A Northbound L 245 1770 0.72 0.138 63.3 E TR 227 1642 0.33 0.138 51.5 D Southbound L 136 1770 0.13 0.077 56.3 E R 1 1 0 L TR 14 4 38 12.0 12.0 0 6 A A A 18.0 4.0 3.0 7 8 Approach Delay LOS 12.3 B 9.6 A 59.8 E A - 24 TR 124 1611 0.41 0.077 59.4 E 58.6 E Intersection Delay = 14.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60PPX.hcs SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ' Inter: SR 60 / PARK PLACE / MALL E City/St: CLEARWATER FL Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS ' Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: PARK PLACE / MALL E. No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width ' RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 1 3 0 L TR 99 1561 37 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 1 L T R 72 2150 99 12.0 12.0 12.0 13 Page 1 A-25'- Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 38 18 46 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 82 25 99 12.0 12.0 12.0 15 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 69.0 31.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' All Red 2.0 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 234 0.45 0.662 23.7 C TR 2690 5068 0.63 0.531 15.9 B 16.4 B Westbound L 268 0.29 0.662 11.7 B I T 2699 5085 0.86 0.531 21.8 C 21.0 C R 840 1583 0.11 0.531 10.9 B Northbound I L 327 1370 0.13 0.238 39.1 D TR 396 1662 0.18 0.238 39.6 D 39.4 D Southbound ' L 316 1324 0.34 0.238 41.7 D T 444 1863 0.07 0.238 38.4 D 41.0 D R 377 1583 0.30 0.238 41.0 D Intersection Delay = 20.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60SKYX.hcs Page 1 _ 2(p HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ' Inter: SR 60 / SKY HARBOR City/St. CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK ' E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: SKY HARBOR DR. Eastb L T No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width ' RTOR Vol 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ound Westbound Northbound Southb R L T R L T R L T 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 TR L T LR 1990 33 83 2267 35 107 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left ' Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 103.0 15.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 1 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound ' TR 4019 5073 0.53 0.792 0.1 A 0.1 A Westbound L 121 153 0.74 0.792 27.4 C T 4029 5085 0.61 0.792 0.3 A 1.2 A Northbound LR 170 1469 1.12 0.115 161.6 F 161.6 F Southbound R Intersection Delay = 7.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60HAMPX.hcs Page 1 A _2-7 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / HAMPTON City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Vroj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: HAMPTON RD 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound South L T R L T R L T R L T R. No. Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L TR L TR LTR L TR Volume 64 1669 30 11 2306 146 21 10 11 30 10 42 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 101.0 16.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 66 85 1.02 0.777 129.6 F TR 3941 5072 0.45 0.777 0.1 A 4.8 A Westbound L 172 222 0.07 0.777 3.6 A TR 3916 5040 0.68 0.777 0.5 A 0.5 A Northbound LTR 152 1236 0.47 0.123 55.4 E 55.4 E Southbound L 143 1165 0.24 0.123 52.4 D ITR 202 1638 0.30 0.123 52.8 D 52.6 D 1 Intersection Delay = 4.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60mcmbrx.hcs Page 1 A-28 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / MCMULLEN BOOTH R City/St: CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: GULF TO BAY N/S St: MCMULLEN BOOTH RAMPS No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T -SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R L T R I L T R 2 3 1 L T R 408 971 331 12.0 12.0 12.0 87 2 3 1 L T R 287 1476 691 12.0 12.0 12.0 126 Southbound L T R 2 1 1 L T R 756 205 723 12.0 12.0 12.0 187 2 1 1 L T R 314 5 231 12.0 12.0 12.0 49 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 44.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1 All Red 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity l (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 290 3433 1.51 0.085 307.7 F T 1721 5085 0.61 0.338 34.8 C 103.2 F R 536 1583 0.49 0.338 33.2 C Westbound L 290 3433 1.04 0.085 123.5 F ' T 1721 5085 0.90 0.338 46.2 D 72.1 E R 536 1583 1.11 0.338 113.6 F Northbound L 449 3433 1.91 0.131 475.6 F T 373 1863 0.62 0.200 50.8 D 418.3 F R 317 1583 1.92 0.200 478.0 F Southbound I L 449 3433 0.76 0.131 61.9 E T 373 1863 0.01 0.200 41.7 D 57.9 E R 317 1583 0.62 0.200 51.4 D I Intersec tion Delay = 170 .8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F 8 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/HAINES BAYSHORE City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: HAINES BAYSHORE N/S St: U.S.19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 LGConfig LTR LT R L T R L T R Volume 35 0 44 53 0 215 27 3770 63 160 2834 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 RTOR Vol 0 43 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' WB Left A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.0 7.0 27.0 152.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 122 1330 0.72 0.092 124.8 F 124.8 F Westbound LT 66 718 0.89 0.092 182.6 F 266.2 F R 145 1583 1.32 0.092 292.0 F Northbound L 52 1770 0.58 0.029 129.9 F T 3220 5085 1.30 0.633 181.8 F 178.7 F R 1003 1583 0.07 0.633 16.9 B ' Southbound L 310 1770 0.57 0.175 93.4 F T 3962 5085 0.79 0.779 16.6 B 20.6 C R 1233 1583 0.01 0.779 5.9 A ' Intersection Delay = 114 .6 (sec/veh) Interse ction LOS = F A - Jc) HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/BELLEAIR RD Analyst: JC Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: BELLEAIR RD No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume ' Lane Width RTOR Vol City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R I L T R 1 1 1 L T R 161 28 281 12.0 12.0 12.0 98 1 1 0 L TR 139 51 86 12.0 12.0 17 2 3 1 L T R 368 3583 69 12.0 12.0 12.0 14 Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 53 2484 179 12.0 12.0 12.0 54 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 47.0 17.0 16.0 128.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs l Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 194 991 0.89 0.196 130.4 F ' T 365 1863 0.08 0.196 79.0 E 108.1 F R 310 1583 0.64 0.196 92.9 F Westbound L 269 1374 0.64 0.196 93.7 F TR 333 1702 0.44 0.196 85.9 F 90.1 F Northbound L 586 3433 0.65 T 3220 5085 1.16 R 1003 1583 0.06 ' Southbound L 125 1770 0.45 T 2712 5085 0.96 R 844 1583 0.16 Interse ction Delay = 95.2 0.171 95.5 F 0.633 119.4 F 115.8 F 0.633 16.8 B 0.071 109.5 F 0.533 64.1 E 63.3 E 0.533 28.6 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19 /NURSERY RD Analyst: JC Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: NURSERY RD Eastbound L T R ' No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume ' Lane Width RTOR Vol /-,\ -31 City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R 1 1 L TR 142 42 12.0 12.0 0 161 95 0 1 1 LT R 17 34 50 12.0 12.0 10 1 3 1 L T R 261 3551 18 12.0 12.0 12.0 5 Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 60 2538 375 12.0 12.0 12.0 150 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 36.0 17.0 18.0 137.0 ' Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summ ary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 164 1093 0.96 0.150 160.6 F 1 TR 254 1693 0.47 0.150 94.7 F 132.2 F Westbound ' LT 209 1390 0.36 0.150 92.7 F 91.8 F R 237 1583 0.25 0.150 90.6 F Northbound L 317 I 1770 0.86 0.179 115.8 F T 3454 5085 1.07 0.679 77.0 E 79.4 E R 1075 1583 0.01 0.679 12.5 B ' Southbound L 125 1770 0.50 0.071 110.7 F T 2903 5085 0.91 0.571 50.9 D 50.2 D R 904 1583 0.26 0.571 26.1 C ' Intersection Delay = 69.9 (sec/ve h) Intersection LOS = E HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/HARN BLVD Analyst: JC Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: HARN BLVD ' No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R L T R L T R 1 1 1 L T R 117 18 43 12.0 12.0 12.0 20 1 1 1 L T R 112 25 55 12.0 12.0 12.0 31 Southbound L T R A -32- 1 3 1 L T R 76 3615 52 12.0 12.0 12.0 22 1 3 1 L T R 23 2818 135 12.0 12.0 12.0 40 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds 1WB Left A SE Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 24.0 17.0 150.0 17.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary lAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 138 1375 1.21 0.100 251.9 F I T 186 1863 0.14 0.100 98.9 F 212.1 F R 158 1583 0.21 0.100 99.9 F Westbound L 138 1379 0.94 0.100 166.4 F T 186 1863 0.16 0.100 99.1 F 145.9 F R 158 1583 0.18 0.100 99.5 F orthbound f 125 1770 0.62 0.071 117.8 F 3708 5085 1.01 0.729 48.5 D 49.6 D R 1154 1583 0.03 0.729 9.0 A I Southbound L 125 1770 0.20 0.071 105.9 F T 3708 5085 0.83 0.729 23.8 C 24.0 C R 1154 1583 0.09 0.729 9.4 A Intersection Delay I = 46.0 (sec/ve h) Interse ction LOS = D /?, - -:?, 3 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/DRUID AND SEVILLE City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DRUID/SEVILLE N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 0 1 3 0 LGConfig LT R L LT R L TR L TR Volume 21 52 105 92 42 70 87 3598 102 28 2779 15 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 21 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.0 24.0 17.0 120.0 17.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240 .0 secs lAppr/ Lane Intersection Performance Summ Adj Sat Ratios Lane ary Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity ( s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 168 1836 0.52 R 145 1583 0.69 Westbound L 177 1770 0.60 LT 186 I 1863 0.26 R 158 1583 0.51 Northbound L 125 I 1770 0.70 TR 5099 8440 0.73 I Southbound L 125 1770 0.23 TR 3070 5081 0.95 Interse ction Delay = 47.1 0.092 106.8 F 113.1 F 0.092 118.7 F 0.100 109.2 F 0.100 100.6 F 106.1 F 0.100 105.3 F 0.071 125.5 F 0.604 34.3 C 36.4 D 0.071 106.3 F 0.604 51.5 D 52.0 D (sec/veh) In ters ection LOS = D 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 ' Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: U.S. 19 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 1 2 1 L T R 182 478 234 12.0 12.0 12.0 47 1 2 0 L TR 186 342 207 12.0 12.0 41 1 3 1 L T R 249 3244 306 12.0 12.0 12.0 61 Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 159 1989 175 12.0 12.0 12.0 35 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 - EB Left A NB Left ' Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds ' WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A A A Green 20.0 37.0 24.0 77.0 42.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summ ary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 148 1770 1.47 0.083 352.8 F T 546 3539 1.04 0.154 151.4 F 191.2 F R 244 1583 0.91 0.154 135.4 F Westbound L 148 1770 1.38 0.083 316.8 F ' TR 519 3366 1.08 0.154 162.7 F 204.0 F Northbound L 310 1770 0.85 T 2691 5085 1.28 R 838 1583 0.31 ' Southbound L 177 1770 0.95 T 2309 5085 0.92 R 719 1583 0.21 Interse ction Delay = 147.6 0.175 116.2 F 0.529 186.6 F 171.7 F 0.529 32.1 C 0.100 161.8 F 0.454 67.6 E 72.4 E 0.454 39.6 D (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F /x-35 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/N.E. COACHMAN Analyst: JC ' Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: N.E. COACHMAN Eastb L T ' No. Lanes LGConfig Volume ' Lane Width RTOR Vol City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 2 1 1 L T R 266 427 27 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 2 1 1 L T R 96 447 269 12.0 12.0 12.0 54 1 3 1 L T R 112 3398 123 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 171 2200 226 12.0 12.0 12.0 45 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ?WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 25.0 34.0 17.0 99.0 25.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary lAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 358 3433 0.83 0.104 120.1 F I T 264 1863 1.80 0.142 475.7 F 329.7 F R 224 1583 0.13 0.142 90.4 F Westbound L 358 3433 0.29 0.104 99.8 F I T 264 1863 1.86 0.142 504.2 F 360.6 F R 224 1583 1.05 0.142 177.9 F Northbound , L 184 1770 0.64 0.104 110.2 F T 2797 5085 1.27 0.550 176.5 F 169.4 F R 871 1583 0.15 0.550 26.5 C Southbound IL 125 1770 1.46 0.071 355.4 F T 2627 5085 0.89 0.517 56.2 E 74.5 E R 818 1583 0.24 0.517 32.1 C Intersection Delay I = 173 .1 (sec/ve h) Intersection LOS = F A -3(D ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/SUNSET POINT RD Analyst: JC Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: SUNSET POINT RD ' No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R L T R 2 2 1 L T R 482 520 223 12.0 12.0 12.0 45 2 2 1 L T R 215 551 212 12.0 12.0 12.0 42 2 3 1 L T R 259 3256 123 12.0 12.0 12.0 25 Southbound L T R 2 3 1 L T R 101 1608 276 12.0 12.0 12.0 55 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right 8 Green 25.0 30.0 17.0 85.0 43.0 ' Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS I Eastbound L 358 3433 1.48 0.104 338.2 F T 442 3539 1.29 0.125 252.4 F 274.4 F R 198 1583 0.99 0.125 165.7 F Westbound L 358 3433 0.66 0.104 107.8 F ' T 442 3539 1.37 0.125 284.9 F 220.1 F R 198 1583 0.94 0.125 152.4 F Northbound L 615 3433 0.44 0.179 88.4 F T 2881 5085 1.19 0.567 141.0 F 134.1 F R 897 1583 0.11 0.567 24.2 C ' Southbound L 243 3433 0.44 0.071 108.2 F T 2331 5085 0.73 0.458 53.9 D 55.3 E R 726 1583 0.32 0.458 41.5 D ' Interse ction Delay = 147.6 (sec/veh) In tersection L OS = F A-Z7 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: BELCHER RD/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/30/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: BELCHER RD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ' No. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 LGConfig L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume 266 665 92 173 580 186 80 1063 170 144 780 59 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' WB Left A A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 21.0 45.0 11.0 53.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 150.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 341 0.92 0.473 69.5 E ' TR 1043 3475 0.85 0.300 56.4 E 59.8 E Westbound L 321 0.56 0.473 35.5 D ' TR 1023 3410 0.78 0.300 51.9 D 48.9 D Northbound ' L 228 0.40 0.460 29.5 C TR 1225 3466 1.14 0.353 123.3 F 117.5 F Southbound L 203 0.79 0.460 87.3 F TR 1237 3502 0.75 0.353 45.4 D 51.6 D Intersection Delay = 73.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E A -38 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/ OLD COACHMAN City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY ,Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/31/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: OLD COACHMAN RD ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound ( Northbound Southbound L R L R L R ' No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol L TR 40 783 156 12.0 12.0 0 L TR 260 680 131 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 179 377 121 12.0 12.0 12.0 48 1 1 0 L TR 23 201 80 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A A I Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A A Thru I A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0 33.0 15.0 32.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Interse ction Pe rformance Summary lAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS , Eastbound L 387 0.11 0.483 20.2 C 'TR 949 3451 1.09 0.275 99.1 F 95.8 F Westbound L 387 0.71 0.483 53.2 D ITR 950 3453 0.90 0.275 53.3 D 53.2 D orthbound f 386 0.55 0.433 25.5 C 497 1863 0.89 0.267 60.7 E 47.6 D R 422 1583 0.20 0.267 34.4 C Southbound ' L 313 0.09 0.433 23.2 C TR 475 1783 0.69 0.267 43.7 D 42.1 D Intersection Delay = 64.7 (sec/veh) Interse ction LOS = E A-39 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/FAIRWOODS AVE City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: FAIRWOODS AVE/PARK PLACE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R L T R ' No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane width RTOR Vol 1 2 0 L TR 216 670 57 12.0 12.0 0 L TR 40 505 164 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 107 112 104 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds 1 WE Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 58.0 17.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios _ Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 532 0.45 0.730 6.1 A TR 2029 3498 0.40 0.580 11.6 B Westbound L 522 0.09 0.730 4.7 A ' TR 1977 3409 0.40 0.580 11.6 B orthbound f 164 965 0.79 0.170 62.6 E 317 1863 0.43 0.170 38.1 D R 269 1583 0.47 0.170 38.8 D Southbound L 189 1112 0.30 0.170 37.2 D 1 1 0 L TR 52 29 123 12.0 12.0 0 6 7 8 Approach Delay LOS 10.3 B 11.2 B 46.4 D TR 278 1637 0.60 0.170 42.0 D 40.8 D ' Intersection Delay = 19.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B A°40 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/HAMPTON RD City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: HAMPTON RD ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ' No. Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 LGConfig TR L T L R Volume 784 42 35 562 147 40 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 8 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 73.0 17.0 ' Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ' TR 2564 3512 0.34 0.730 4.9 A 4.9 A Westbound L 422 578 0.09 0.730 4.0 A T 2583 3539 0.24 0.730 4.5 A 4.4 A Northbound I L 301 1770 0.65 0.170 43.7 D 42.2 D R 269 1583 0.16 0.170 35.7 D ' Southbound Intersection Delay = 9.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: MCMULLEN-BOOTH/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: MCMULLEN-BOOTH RD ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 LGConf ig L LT R L TR L TR L TR Volume 365 196 263 42 174 17 154 3020 38 18 1749 269 1 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 53 0 0 54 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 10.0 10.0 134.0 10.0 ' Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 210.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 1 Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 - Eastbound L 152 1770 2.45 0.086 766.8 F LT 160 1863 1.25 0.086 249.7 F 531.6 F R 136 1583 1.57 0.086 386.4 F Westbound L 84 1770 0.64 0.048 113.8 F TR 88 1838 2.78 0.048 933.6 F 785.5 F Northbound L 84 1770 1.93 0.048 558.4 F TR 3626 5076 0.89 0.714 26.5 C 52.0 D 1 Southbound L 84 1770 0.25 0.048 97.9 F TR 3573 5002 0.65 0.714 16.3 B 17.1 B ' Interse ction Delay = 127.7 (sec/veh) In tersection LOS = F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: HAMPTON RD/BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE Analyst: JC Project No.: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 T East/West Street: BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE North/South Street: HAMPTON RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 3 4 L T R I L -42- Southbound 5 6 T R Volume 0 211 15 31 67 0 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 251 17 41 90 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (o) Median Storage 5 ' Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? ' Lanes Configuration 17 0 11 5 0 8 34 0 22 9 0 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR No 0 1 0 LTR .' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 ' Lane Config L L ( LTR I v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Eastbound 11 12 LTR 0 41 56 23 1505 1296 734 817 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 7.4 7.9 10.3 9.5 A A B A 10.3 9.5 B A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 APPENDIX B ITEM PAGE ART_TAB S.R. 60 (Keene - U.S. 19) B-1 ART_TAB S.R. 60 (U.S. 19 - Bayshore Bridge) B-2 ART_TAB U.S. 19 (Haines Bayshore - S.R. 60) B-3 FDOT Generalized Two-Way Peak Hour Table B-4 FDOT Generalized Peak Hour Peak Directional Table B-5 Off Peak Directional Table B-6 Signal Timings B-7 to B-10 A Arterial Based on Chapter 1 I` Florida De - April l9f DESCRIPTION (toad Name _ ' SR 60 FroCh '' KEENE TO US 19 Peak Direction EASTBOUND Study Time Period. : PM Peak Analysis Date AUGUST 2000 Number of Lanes ' 6LD AADT, 1,992 -- User Note: EXISTING CONDITIONS 4+ n o nrTCO ' K Factor 0.082 D Factor!! 0.52 Peak Hour Factor' 0.94 Adj Saturation Flow Rate 1850 % Turns from Exclusive Lane 12 (1400 - 2000) (0-100) 33.1 Volume Tables way Capacity Manual Update Transportation PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.38095 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 690 970 1,030 2 N/A N/A 1,480 ---_1.960 3 2,270 2,960 3,090 4 N/A N/A 3,070 3,950 4,120 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.38095 Intersections per mile Level of Service ONES - A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 1,330 1,870 11980 4 N/A N/A 2,840 3,770 3,960 4,370 5&90 5,940 8 N/A 5,910 7,600 7,920 ' ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural Area Type U Arterial Class 2 Free Flow Speed(mph) 40 Total Length of Arterial(mi) 2.1 Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTIC: No.Signalized Intersections 5 Arrival Type,Peak Dir 4 ' Type Signal System S System Cycle Length(sec) 150 Weiqhted Thru Mvmt a/C 0.49 (U, T, or R) (1,2,3, or 4) (45, 40, or 35) (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) (P, S, or A) (60 - 240 sec) in 9n-narn Note that intersection capacity is reached at LOS 'E'. Constant volumes across the remaining LOS ranges indicate that these levels are not achievable. Higher volumes result in an F. (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.38095 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 16,200 22,800 24,200 4 N/A N/A 34,600 46,000 48,300 6 N/A N/A 53,300 69,300 72,500 8 N/A N/A 72,100 92,700 96,600 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for the Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.67 0.94 1.00 2 N/A N/A 0.72 0.95 1.00 3 N/A N/A 0.74 0.96 1.00 4 N/A NIA 0.75 0.96 1.00 OFF - R-?:sK C 'D F- 100 27 3a 2;8So 'ELI - `-TAB 3.1 of Service Volume Tables 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update rent of Transportation Poad,N F Peak Dire( Study Time Pe Analysis I ).57 (0<50- 1,06) ).94 (0.70 -1.00) 850 (1400 - 2000) 12 (o - loo) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural Area Type U Arterial Class 2 Free Flow Speed(mph) 45 Total Length of Arterial(mi) 1.5 Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTIC: No.Signalized Intersections 6 Arrival Type,Peak Dir 4 Type Signal System S System Cycle Length(sec) 130 Weiahted Thru Mvmt o/C 0.53 ne> SR 60- m US 19 To BAYSHORE on WESTBOUND xl PM Peak to AUGUST 2000 es' 6LD ,456 LISTING CONDITIONS CS -Range-- 0.087 (0:06 - 020) (U, T, or R) (1,2,3, or 4) (45, 40, or 35) (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) (P, S, or A) (60 - 240 sec) m9n-narn PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 670 990 1,080 2 N/A N/A 1,470 2,030 2,170 3 N/A N/A 2,270 3,100 3,270 4 N/A N/A 3,080 4,190 4.360 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 1,180 1,730 1,890 4 N/A N/A 2,580 3,570 3,810 6 N/A N/A _ 3,980 5,450 5.730 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 13,600 19,900 21,700 4 N/A N/A 29,600 41,000 43,800 6 N/A N/A 45,800 62,600 65,900 8 N/A N/A 62,100 84,500 88,000 11 N/A means the level of service is not achievable PeaK Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for the Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.60 0.88 0.97 2 N/A N/A 0.66 0.91 0.97 3 N/A N/A 0.68 0.93 0.98 4 N/A N/A 0.69 0.94 0.98 PEAK C P- E 1-7 1 D ?-350 2-4 Q-, - 3 rA'B 3.1 ervice Volume Tables 7 Highway Capacity Manual Update Transportation Road Nan Fro __. US 19 HAINES-BAYSHORE SR 60 NORTHBOUND )GUST 20000 733 ' K Factor 0.087 D' Factor 0.56 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 Adj Saturation Flow Rate 1850 % Turns from Exclusive Lane 12 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural Area Type U Arterial Class 1 Free Flow Speed(mph) 50 Total Length of Arterial(mi) 2.05 Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (Y/N) Y (U, T, or R) (1,2,3, or 4) (55,50,45,40,35) SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS No.Signalized Intersections Arrival Type,Peak Dir Type Signal System System Cycle Length(sec) 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) S (P, S, or A) 40. , (60 - 240 sec) R7 in gn _ n nrn Note that intersection capacity is reached at LOS 'E'. Constant volumes across the remaining LOS ranges indicate that these levels are not achievable. Higher volumes result in an F. PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.43902 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 740 1,200 1,340 1,410 2 N/A 1,560 2,460 2,710 2,820 3 N/A 2 370 3,7 30 4 080 4 230 4 N/A 3,190 - 5,010 5,450 5,630 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.43902 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A 1,330 2,140 2,400 2,520 4 NIA 2,780 4,390 4,840 5,030 6 N/A 4,240 6,660 7,290 7,550 8 N/A 5,690 8,950 9,730 10,060 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.43902 Intersections per mile Level of Service ONES A B C D E 2 N/A 15,300 24,600 27,600 28,900 4 N/A 32,000 50,400 55,600 57,800 6 N/A 48,700 76,500 83,700 86,700 8 N/A 65,500 102,900 111,900 115,600 - / A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Flour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for the Full Hour Level of Service LAN ES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.53 0.85 0.95 1.00 2 N/A 0.55 0.87 0.96 1.00 3 N/A 0.56 0.88 0.97 1.00 4 N/A 0.57 0.89 0.97 1.00 187d 2930 3210 33Za Table 5-7 URBANIZ ED AREA S* STATE 7WO-WAY ARTERIALS FREEWAYS UNINTERRUPTED FLOW Unsignelized Group 1 h+ithinurbanized area wersoo,0ooandlea6rrtom g passing withn 5 miles at the LerICSJ Level of Service Ddmary ciN certml business disMeq Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided 810 1,270 1,720 2,260 3,010 Lanes Level of Service A 4 Divided 1,950 3,260 4,560 5,470 6 Divided 2, 8 930 4 890 6 840 6,510 4 B C D 1,900 3,000 4500 5 00 7,200 , , ,210 ,210 9,770 6 2,900 4,600 7,000 8,900 11,000 8 3,900 6,300 9,500 12,200 15,100 10 4,900 7,900 11,900 15,200 18 800 INTERRUPTED FLOW 12 5,700 9,300 13,900 17,900 , 22,100 Class I (,0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections perm le) Group 2 Mdthin urbanized area end not in Caoto 11 Lanes/ Level of Service Divided /? • B C D••• E'•• Lanes Level of Service A 2 Undivided N/A 1,000 1,450 1,550 4 Divided N/A 2 190 3 1,550 4 B C D 1,900 3,000 4,500 5,800 E 6 900 P G , ,080 3,260 6 Divided N/A 3,330 4,640 4 890 3,260 4 890 6 8 3,000 4,600 7,000 8,900 , 10,500 . Q5 !E , 8 Divided N/A 4,210 5,710 5,990 4- 7 ' , 5,990 10 4,000 6,300 9,500 12,100 5,000 7,900 11,900 15,100 14,400 18 000 ' L1 '" dAaO Zg2S 3100 3ico 12 5,900 9,300 13,900 17,700 , 21,100 lass II 3 1 e ? 441 ID 4?S ? 47 TZ oo to 4.50 signaliz e 5 ectio Lanes/ Level of Service NON-STATE ROADWAYS Divided C D M• B•' E MAJOR aTY/COUNTY ROADWAYS 2 Undivided N/A N/A 920 1,390 1 500 4 Divided N/A N/A 2,130 3,020 , 3,190 Lanes Level of Service /1 • B•• 6 Divided N/A N/A 3,300 4,550 4,810 2 Undivided C D E e Divided N/A N/A 4,160 5,590 4l D - 5,900 4 Divided N/A N/A 1,810 2,880 3,080 r - 242.6 218-7z> 30'30 6 Divided N/A N/A 2,800 4 350 4 640 43 5 Class Ill ry , , (more than 4.50 signalized intersections permits and not w to prima v central business district of urbanized area over5oo owI . OTHER SK NAIJffD ROADWAYS Lanes/ Level of Service (signalized intersection analysis) Divided /4 • B-• C D E Lanes 2 Undivided B« C D N/P N/A 430 E 2 Undivided N/A N/A 310 1,110 4 Divided N/A N/A 1,450 4 Divided UW N/A N/A 1,060 2,170 1,090 2 310 720 2,560 3 090 , 6 Divided N/A N/A 1,120 3,980 4,650 8 Divided N/A N/A 1,410 4,990 5,710 ADJUSTMENTS Class IV =n4.50 signalized intersections ppeermite and within primary district f b i city central DNIDEDAINDNIDED o ur an zed area over ,D00) (alts, corresponding twvway volume indicated percent) Left Turn Adjustment Lanes/ Level of Service Lanes 2 Median Bays Factors Divided X. B•• C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% Undivided No 2 Undivided N/A N/A 340 1,270 4 Divided N/A 1,410 MlAi -20% Undivided Yes -5% N/A 820 2,750 6 Divided N/A N/A 1 290 4 190 2,990 Multi Undivided No -25% , , 8 Divided N/A N/A 1,610 5,170 4,510 5,530 ONE-WAY (aliercorrespondingtwo-way volumeindicatedpercent) The Florida Department of Transportation Source. Systems Planning Office One Way Adjustment 605 Suwannee Street - Mail Station 19 Lames EcidvatsK TwoWavLanes Factors Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 2 4 -40% 3 6 -40% http://www.dot.state.f1.us/planning 4 8 -40% 5 8 -25% ' The table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corrid i or or ntersection des more refined techniques exist. Values shown are two-way hourly maximum volumes for lev l f i d ign, where Capacity Manual and Florida traffic roadwa and si nalization dat T e s o ce, an serv are based on the 1997 Update to th e Highway a , y, g a n i . o convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must be di vided by appropr ate K100 factor (not peak-to-daily ratio). The table's input value assumptions and level of serv ice criteria appear on the followin a e " Cannot be achieved. g p g . " Volumes are comparable because intersection capacities have been reached . September 1 998 i Table 5-1 GENERALIZED PEAK HO UR PEAK DIR ECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FL(jFdDxs URBANIZ ED AREA S* STATE TWO- WAY ARTERIALS FREEWAYS UNINTERRUPTED FLOW Un si gn all zed Group'! tonthin urbanized area wer500.000 and leading to a passing within 5 miles of the Lan a W Level of Service ndwmw rift ca burin- Blame" DI vl dad A B C D E Le l f S i 2 Undivided 460 720 980 1,280 1 710 Lanes ve o erv ce A B C 4 Divided 6 i 1,710 1,850 2,590 3,110 L , 3,700 4 D 1,060 1,720 2.570 3 310 E 4 090 D vided 1,670 2,780 3,890 4,660 5,550 6 , 1,630 2,630 3,950 tin , 6,270 8 10 2,220 3,590 5,390 6,930 2 780 4 490 6 730 8,550 , , . 8,660 10,690 INTERRUPTEDFLOW 12 3,260 5,270 7,900 10.160 12,540 ClassI (>omto 1.99signalized hrtasecbonspermit) Group2 (widsn urbanized area and not in Group t) Lan a s/ Level of Service Level of Service DI vi dad N. B C 0••• E••• Lanes A B C 2 Undivided N/ A 570 820 880 880 4 D 1,090 1,710 2,570 3,270 E 3 900 4 Divided N/ A 1,240 1,750 1,850 L 1,850 6 1,680 2,630 3,950 5 030 , 5 990 6 Divided 8 Divided N/ A 1,890 2,640 2,780 N/ A 2 390 3 240 00 2,780 a , 2,290 3,590 5,390 6,860 , 8.170 4L17 , , 3.4 3,400 10 2,860 4,490 6,740 8,580 10,210 ( 1? k- ? 12 3,350 5,270 7,900 10,050 11,970 Css If Class P('0 , 40 ,? t nz l -}a 2 (1.0014.50 slgnau IMe s7'ecUo p rnlle) ^6 µo Lanes/ Level of Service NON- STATE ROADWAYS DI vi dad X. B•• C D E MAJOR CRY/COUNTY ROADWAYS 2 Undivided N/ A 520 790 850 Level of Service 4 Divided 6 Div ided N/ A 1,210. 1,710 1:T 1,810 Lanes M• B•• C D•, , E N/ A 1,880 2,580 2,730 2 Undivided N/ A N/ A 440 .760 830 8 Divided N/ A 2,360 3,180 3,350 4 Divided N/ A N/ A 1,030 1,640 1 750 7 4 D - 1150 1025 I -12A 6 Divided N/ A N/ A 1.590 2.470 , 2 640 s G L-v Class III - 1 -1 0S 2450 One- N 450 i Z,-^,5 an s gnalized Intersections pernrie and not within pn maty city central business disbict of urbanized area wer 500.0001 OTHER SKWAUZEO ROADWAYS Lanes! Level of Service (Signarmed intersection analysis) DI vi dad X. B•• Lanes X. B•• C D E 2 Undivided C D N/ A N/ A 170 630 E 820 2Undivided 4 Divided N/ N/ 250 560 N/ 620 4 Divided N/ A N/ A 410 1,450 1,750 N/ 600 1,230 1,310 6 Divided 8 Divided N/ A N/ A 630 2,260 N/ A N/ A 2,640 800 2,830 3,240 ADJUSTWNIS Class IV (mom Nan 450 signalized intersections per mile and wipdn primary city central DWIDEDNNDNIDED mralnwea ,r.mry M rrau„IaaA anew nvwrfirNf Mr11 prier corresponding dimc lanai volume Indicated Percent) Left Turn Adjust men Lanes/ Level of Service Lanes Me dl an Bay a t Fad o rs 01 vi dad X. B•• C D E 2 2 Divided Yes +5% Undivided No 2 Undivided A 190 720 800 Will -20% Undivided Yes 4 Divided N/ A 470 1,560 T 1,700 Mufti -5% Undivided No -25% 6 Divided N/ A 730 2,380 2,560 8 Divided /A N/ A 920 2,930 3,140 ONE` WAY (altercar s d di pon ing e recbonal volume indlratd percent) The Florida Department of Transportation Source: Systems Planning Of f ice One- Way Adjust men 605 Suwannee Street - Mail Station 19 Lanes Equivalent T-wav Lanes t Fad o rs Tallahassee, Florida 32399.0450 2 4 +205/6 3 6 +20% http:/ / www dot state fl us/ plannin 4 8 +20% . . . . g 5 8 +50% The table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design where more refined t echniques exist. Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels of service and are based on the 1997 Update to the Hi hwa , , g y Capacity Manual and Florida traffic, roadway and signaliization data To convert to l d i f i an a t ro i , D f . annua av erage a ly tra f c volumes, these volumes must be divi ded by pp pr a e actor and K100 factor (not peak-to-daily ratio). The table's input value assumptions and level of service criteria appear on the following page. " Cannot be achieved. •• Volumes are comparable because intersection capacities have been reached . September 1998 1r9 , 2€ , 16 . UV I -70 . (,?a .._...._ 114c_a.._.. .._?,4r? _ 4-:-? - - _ --------. -- -------------•--•----_.i- .... ..... ..........___..___-.---.._----------------------W ------._ ........... .... ---- ----? -- _ . - -- - _.__..---- . ii A -- ..._-- - - - - ?2 a --- 9 a------ v _ .c --477SO --- ICA I it ---- -------- C>-s ITEM APPENDIX C Intersection Impact Charts HCS 2003 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/U.S. 19 Ramps HCS 2003 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Benningan's Drive HCS 2003 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Park Place Blvd HCS 2003 Drew St[U.S. 19 HCS 2003 Drew St (Interchange)/U.S. 19 HCS 2003 Drew St/Fairwoods/Park Place Blvd HCS 2003 Hampton Rd/Bausch & Lomb/Islands in the Sun MHP Drive HCS 2003 Hampton Rd/Parcel 6 Drive PAGE C-1 to C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-1 I INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT DREW ST / BELCHER RD EBL EBT+R - WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 1 19 9 63 0 3 8 0 102 LANE CAPACITY 341 1043 321 1023 228 1225 203 1237 5621 1.81% NOTIMPACTED DREW ST / OLD COACHMAN RD EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 30 0 81 0 0 4 0 115 LANE CAPACITY 387 949 387 950 386 497 422 313 475 4766 2.41% NOTIMPACTED DREW ST / U.S. 19 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 34 0 0 279 0 0 0 84 0 0 397 LANE CAPACITY 148 546 244 148 519 310 2691 838 177 2309 719 8649 4.59% IMPACTED DREW ST / PARK PLACE EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 118 15 0 279 9 51 0 4 476 LANE CAPACITY 543 2069 534 2017 167 323 275 193 284 6405 7.43% IMPACTED DREW ST / HAMPTON EBT+R WBL WBT NBL NBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 51 15 15 0 21 102 LANE CAPACITY 2564 422 2583 301 269 6139 1.66% NOTIMPACTED DREW ST / MCMULLEN-BOOTH EBL EBL+T EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 45 18 0 0 8 0 0 0 19 90 LANE CAPACITY 152 160 136 84 88 84 3626 84 3573 7987 1.13% NOTIMPACTED n I INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT S.R. 60 / BAYSIDE BRIDGE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 54 126 0 23 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 256 LANE CAPACITY 290 1721 536 290 1721 536 449 373 317 449 373 317 7372 3.47% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 /HAMPTON EBL EBT+R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBL+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 150 0 76 0 30 0 256 LANE CAPACITY 66 3941 172 3916 152 143 202 8592 2.98% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 / SKY HARBOR EBT+R WBL WBT NB SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 150 0 50 0 200 LANE CAPACITY 4019 121 4029 170 8339 2.40% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 / PARK PLACE EBL EBT+R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT+R SBL SBT SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 115 0 0 0 50 0 8 150 17 274 614 LANE CAPACITY 234 2690 268 2699 840 327 396 316 444 377 8591 7.15% IMPACTED S.R. 60 / BENNIGAN'S DRIVE EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 29 115 0 274 0 0 0 68 486 LANE CAPACITY 57 3164 110 3205 245 227 136 124 7268 6.69% IMPACTED S.R. 60 / U.S.19 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 84 0 144 198 0 0 60 0 0 486 LANE CAPACITY 381 1995 621 477 2269 706 607 280 607 280 8223 5.91% IMPACTED F) p INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT S.R. 60 / OLD COACHMAN EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 76 0 0 197 0 0 8 0 281 LANE CAPACITY 166 2816 877 166 2743 200 462 331 463 8224 3.42% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 / BELCHER RD EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 61 36 144 0 15 0 0 256 LANE CAPACITY 273 1806 273 1804 310 812 310 806 6394 4.00% NOTIMPACTED n HCS-Signals 3.2 File:6019RFUT.hcs Page 1 C -- 4. HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / US 19 RAMPS ,Anal yst: RP Date: 9/8/00 E/W St: GULF TO BAY (SR 60) INo. Lanes LGConf ig folume ane Width TOR Vol Eastb L T City/St: CLEARWATER Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Period: PM PEAK N/S St: US 19 RAMPS _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 1 3 1 L T R 278 1085 452 12.0 12.0 12.0 93 1 3 1 L T R 349 1795 443 12.0 12.0 12.0 66 2 0 1 L R 444 367 12.0 12.0 78 Southbound L T R 2 0 1 L R 430 266 12.0 12.0 65 Duration 0.25 Area '.rype: All or-ner areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ? Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds ?WB Left A SB Left A Thru A A Thru . Right A A Right A Peds Peds INB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 16.0 35.0 23.0 , Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130 .0 secs Interse ction Performance Summ ary , Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 381 1770 0.78 0.215 58.5 E T 1995 ' 5085 0.58 0.392 28.6 C 33.8 C R 621 1583 0.62 0.392 30.6 C Westbound L 477 1770 0.79 0.269 52.5 D T 2269 5085 0.85 0.446 30.3 C 32.4 C R 706 1583 0.57 0.446 23.7 C Northbound L 607 3433 0.77 0.177 57.0 E 86.6 F R 280 1583 1.09 0.177 132.1 F j Southbound L 607 3433 0.75 0.177 55.8 E 57.8 E ' R 280 1583 0.76 0.177 62.1 E Intersection Delay = 42.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60BENFUT.hcs Page 1 C`t HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ' Inter: SR 60 / BENNIGANS MALL W / City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: MALL W. / BENNIGANS ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbou L T R I L T R I L T R L T N L R 94 o. anes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConf ig L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume 81 1656 165 18 2363 24 160 14 55 34 4 76 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ?WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right ISB Right WB Right Green 82.0 10.0 18.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ,.Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS !Eastbound L 57 91 1.49 0.631 317.3 F IF R 3164 5016 0.61 0.631 7.4 A 20.6 C Westbound 106 168 0.18 0.631 10.8 B R 3203 5078 0.80 0.631 10.4 B 10.4 B Northbound 245 t 1770 0.73 0.138 64.0 E R 227 1641 0.34 0.138 51.5 D 60.2 E outhbound s 136 1770 0.30 0.077 58.0 E TR 123 1598 0.80 0.077 88.6 F 79.6 E 1 Interse ction Delay = 19.0 (sec/veh) In tersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60PPFUT.hcs Page 1 C , (o HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / PARK PLACE / MALL E City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: PARK PLACE / MALL E. Eastb L T 1 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 1 3 0 L TR 157 1577 37 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 1 L T R 73 2173 124 12.0 12.0 12.0 13 Southbound L T R 1 1 0 1 1 1 L TR L T R 38 18 46 170 31 206 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 15 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A I Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds 1 WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 69.0 31.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summ ary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 234 0.71 0.662 45.5 D 'TR 2690 5068 0.64 0.531 16.0 B 18.6 B Westbound L 266 0.29 0.662 11.9 B T 2699 5085 0.87 0.531 22.2 C 21.4 C R 840 1583 0.14 0.531 11.2 B orthbound f 324 1360 0.13 0.238 39.1 D R 396 1662 0.18 0.238 39.6 D 39.4 D Southbound L 316 1324 0.72 0.238 53.2 D T 444 1863 0.09 0.238 38.6 D 50.4 D R 377 1583 0.68 0.238 49.7 D I Intersection Delay = 23.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.2 File:19DREWFUT.hcs Page 1 C.-17 I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 ' Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: U.S. 19 Eastbound L T R No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R 1 2 1 L T R 184 486 236 12.0 12.0 12.0 47 1 2 0 L TR 188 371 272 12.0 12.0 41 1 3 1 L T R 252 3278 309 12.0 12.0 12.0 61 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0 37.0 24.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs 6 7 8 A A A A A A A 77.0 42.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 148 1770 1.48 0.083 358.5 F T 546 3539 1.06 0.154 157.0 F 195.8 F R 244 1583 0.92 0.154 137.3 F Westbound L 148 1770 1.40 0.083 325.0 F TR 514 3336 1.29 0.154 245.2 F 264.2 F Northbound L 310 1770 0.86 0.175 117.8 F T 2691 5085 1.30 0.529 192.5 F 177.0 F R 838 1583 0.32 0.529 32.1 C Southbound L 177 1770 1.02 0.100 180.1 F T 2309 5085 0.93 0.454 - 68.8 E 75.1 E R 719 1583 0.21 0.454 39.7 D Intersection Delay = 158.3 (sec/veh ) Interse ction LOS = F Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 169 2010 177 12.0 12.0 12.0 35 _TNTt:-R,CHAW6)Naepet> C-00 HCS-Signals 3.2 File:19DREWICHNG.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 \A/rTk Inter: U.S. 19/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003, WITH I Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: U.S. 19 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 2 2 1 L T R 184 486 236 12.0 12.0 12.0 60 2 2 1 L T R 188 371 272 12.0 12.0 12.0 68 2 2 1 L T R 252 721 309 12.0 12.0 12.0 77 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A Green 10.0 24.0 10.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summ ary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane _ Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 343 3433 0.57 0.100 45.1 D T 849 3539 0.60 0.240 35.0- C R 380 1583 0.49 0.240 33.7 C Westbound L 343 3433 0.58 0.100 45.4 D T 849 3539 0.46 0.240 32.9 C R 380 1583 0.57 0.240 35.4 D orthbound f 343 3433 0.77 0.100 54.3 D 849 3539 0.89 0.240 48.7 D R 380 1583 0.64 0.240 37.8 D Southbound 24.0 5.0 3.0 Approach Delay LOS 36.9 D 36.6 D 47.8 D L 343 3433 0.52 0.100 44.1 D T 849 3539 0.86 0.240 45.6 D 43.6 D R 380 1583 0.37 0.240 32.3 C I Intersection Delay = 42.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Southbound L T R 2 2 1 L T R 169 696 177 12.0 12.0 12.0 45 HCS-Signals 3.2 File:DREWPARKFUT.HCS Page 1 C-9 I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/FAIRWOODS AVE/PARK PLA City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: FAIRWOODS AVE/PARK PLACE 1 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SI( Eastbound L T R 3NALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 1 2 0 L TR 218 677 69 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 40 510 166 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 195 115 119 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 58.0 17.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios _ Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 528 0.46 0.730 6.1 A TR 2024 3490 0.41 0.580 11.7 B Westbound L 513 0.09 0.730 4.8 A i TR 1977 3409 0.40 0.580 11.6 B orthbound f 163 960 1.46 0.170 279.1 F 317 1863 0.44 0.170 38.2 D R 269 1583 0.54 0.170 40.1 D Southbound L 186 1097 0.31 0.170 37.3 D TR 278 1637 0.60 0.170 42.1 D Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 53 29 124 12.0 12.0 0 6 7 8 Approac Delay LOS 10.4 B 11.3 B 148.4 F 40.9 D a Inuersecui.on Delay = 40.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY_ Intersection: HAMPTON RD/BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE Analyst: JC Project No.: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 8/24/00 East/West Street: BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE North/South Street: HAMPTON RD C- nc> ' Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 0 219 15 31 69 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 260 17 41 93 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade 06) Median Storage 5 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration t Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay 1 Approach LOS 17 0 11 5 0 8 34 0 22 9 0 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR Queue Length, and Level of SB Westbound 4 I 7 8 9 L LTR 0 41 1500 1286 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 7.4 7.9 A A 56 726 0.08 0.16 10.4 B 10.4 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 No 0 1 0 LTR Service Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR 23 810 0.03 0.00 9.6 A 9.6 A M HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: HAMPTON RD/PARCEL 6 DRIVE Analyst: JC Project No.: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 East/West Street: PARCEL 6 DRIVE North/South Street: HAMPTON ROAD C- It Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R vvlum_- i :Lu 82 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 244 91 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type TWLTL ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 8 0 17 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 5 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95o queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 7 1501 0.00 0.00 7.4 A Queue Length, and Level of SB Westbound 4 7 8 9 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Service Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR 26 894 0.03 0.00 9.1 A 9.1 A APPENDIX D 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 ' Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 72.4-8606 ' Mr. John Meyer August 10, 2000 ' - .Page2A 100 Mn S F 4= 4- :I A I . . o ce ,ui ing on Parcel 6 may be eliminated via trade-off Mr. John Meyer August 10, 2000, Page .3: ` -fv1r. John Meyer ' August 10, 2000 age 3 D. CAPACITY ANALYSIS The review agencies agreed that to avoid double counting project traffic, estimates of existing PM peak hour external primary trips will be done using ITE Trip Generation, 6" ' Edition. This existing project traffic will be subtracted from the total project traffic to arrive at unbuilt additional project traffic. Additional project traffic from unhuill portions of the Park Place DRI will be, added to accumulated background traffic to identify the total 2003 ' traffic volumes. It was agreed that the total 2003 traffic will be compared to the original ADA build-out (1991) traffic projections. Roadway segments where impact is greater than that previously analyzed will be analyzed in detail on a directional basis to determine 9 expected levels of service in 2003. ' It was agreed that any necessary roadway improvements would be compared to those in the Development Order and any new improvements above and beyond those already listed in the Development Order would be added. ' VI. CONCLUSION ' The applicants consultant agreed a report must be submitted within six months for this methodology to be valid and stated a report would be submitted as soon as possible. Appendices wi i I be numbered and include a table of contents. Also TBRPC requested a new Master Development Plan (Map H) be prepared and submitted with the NOPC application and traffic analysis. FDC agreed it would ' prepare the new Map H. If you agree this letter represents the discussions and agreements made at the August 9, 2000 meeting, please ' sign below and return to me. Sincerely, Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP Vice President/Transportation :es r_A,icytr-5.wo Encl. cc: Gary Jones, City of Clearwater Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO .V Kent Fast, FDOT Marina Pennington, DCA George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Nicholas Shacklcton, Park Place Land Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, ct. at. File 172-07.500 ZO'd £VV9 9L6 Ei8 Printed Name Date, Z 3 pa ^ r -r r r? 6uL --- La 4 ?5?? 10QA dC1:V0 00-£Z-B"V ' Mr. John Meyer August 10, 2000 ' Page 3 D. CAPACITY ANALYSIS ' The review agencies agreed that to avoid double counting project traffic, estimates of existing PM peak hour external primary trips will be done using ITE Trip Generation 6`h ' Edition. This existing project traffic will be subtracted from the total project traffic to arrive at unbuilt additional project traffic. Additional project traffic from unbuilt portions of the Park Place DRI will be added to accumulated background traffic to identify the total 2003 ' traffic volumes. It was agreed that the total 2003 traffic will be compared to the original ADA build-out (1991) traffic projections. Roadway segments where impact is greater than that previously analyzed will be analyzed in detail on a directional basis to determine ' expected levels of service in 2003. It was agreed that any necessary roadway improvements would be compared to those in the Development Order and any new improvements above and beyond those already listed in the Development Order would be added. VI. CONCLUSION ' The applicants consultant agreed a report must be submitted within six months for this methodology to be valid and stated a report would be submitted as soon as possible. Appendices will be numbered and include a table.of contents. Also TBRPC requested a new Master Development Plan (Map H) ' be prepared and submitted with the NOPC. application and traffic analysis. FDC agreed it would prepare the new Map H. If you agree this letter represents the discussions and agreements made at the August 9, 2000 meeting, please sign below and return to me. Sincerely, O/ Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP ' Vice President/Transportation ' :es L:Uneyer-S.wpd Encl. cc: Gary Jones, City of Clearwater ' Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO .Kent Fast, FDOT Manna Pennington, DCA ' George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Nicholas Shackleton, Park Place Land ' Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al. File 172-07.500 M--Z. (Z2anme Date 2aZbp UK- eer G(_ 1 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. L iiiw ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAUSTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 1 July 12, 2000 Mr. John Meyer, DRI Coordinator ' Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard,. Suite 219 ' St. Petersburg, FL 33702 RE: Park Place DRI NOPC (DRI #92) 1 Dear John: Enclosed are two (2) copies of the Transportation Methodology Report for the Park Place DRI - NOPC, We 1 look forward to the methodology meeting, at your office on; August 9, 2000 :30 A.M.). If you have any . questions, please call me at (727) 724-8422. ' Sincerely, 1. ?WV ' Robed t Per o? zzi, A lop- Vice President/Transportation 1 :dc L•?neyer-3.wpd Encl. cc: Gary Jones City of Clearwater - Kent Fast, FDOT Marina Pennington, DCA 1 Ramon Solis, Pinellas County George Deakin, Kimley-Horn 1 . Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al. Nicholas Shackleton, Park Place Land File 172-07.500 1 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA.33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724=8606 1 TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY REPORT FOR ' PARK PLACE DRI/NOPC I. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and east of U.S. 19. Park Place (DRI #92). was originally approved in 1983 to contain the following uses with an expected buildout date of 1991: ' Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f. Office 1,103,000 s.f. Several NOPC analyses have modified the Development Order including modifications of land uses, extension ofbuildout and establishment of land use trade-offinechanisms. These modifications have extended the buildout to December 31, 2000 and approved the following uses: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f.* ' Office 795,520 s.f * Light Industrial 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office/hotel on Parcel 4. ' The Park Place DRI is almost fully built-out and most actual construction has been at densities well below approved levels. The applicant wishes to extend the buildout date to December 31, 2003, reduce the approved office entitlements on Parcel 6 to 100,000 s.f. and institute a trade-off to ' possibly put multi-family on Parcel 6 in lieu of office. A detailed traffic analysis will be prepared to evaluate whether this proposed change results in additional impacts. Specifically three (3) items ' will be evaluated. 1. Whether the proposed change results in a 15% increase in PM peak hour external trips ' generated by the project. 2. Whether the projected PM peak hour traffic volume in the revised buildout year (2003) are ' greater than those predicted in the original buildout year (1991). 3. Whether any projected increase results in unacceptable levels of service and necessary ' improvements above and beyond those included in the Development Order. Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions will be established by conducting PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts at several signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project. These will be supplemented by obtaining multi-day traffic counts on adjacent roadway segments. All traffic counts will be converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. Existing conditions will be analyzed using 1998 FDOT LOS Handbook procedures to include roadway specific traffic and signalization characteristics. Intersections will be analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures as replicated by the HCS or Signal 97 software. III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS A list of roadway improvements programmed for construction within the first three (3) years of the MPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program will be included. A preliminary list, which is subject to change is shown below: PLANNED/PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Segment Improvement Construction Year Agency Drew Street (Highland - N.E. Coachman) Widen to 4LD 2000/01 FDOT #2570331 U.S. 19/Drew Street Interchange 2000/01 FDOT #2569571 U.S. 19 (S. of S.R. 590 - N. of Sunset Point) Interchange 2002/03 FDOT #2568881 Keene Road (Druid to Drew) Widen to 6LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Drew - Sunset Point) Construct 4LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Sunset Point - Virginia) Widen to 4LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920487 Drew/McMullen Booth Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cry. #922361 S.R. 590/McMullen Booth Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #922051 IV. BACKGROUND GROWTH ' Existing traffic on the roadway network will be adjusted to reflect background traffic in the revised buildout year. This will be done using screenline annual growth rates by comparing FSUTMS model projections for 1995 and 2010 along selected screenlines. Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 3 V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the revised project will be made using ITE Trip Generation, 6' Edition. For the revised project a 15% internal capture will be applied as was approved in the 1996 NOPC. As was approved in all previous NOPC traffic analysis, a 2.5% transit capture will be applied for PSTA routes. Retail pass-by capture will be based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook and will not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. B. Trip Distribution Project traffic distribution will be based on the FSUTMS Regional Transportation Analysis model for the year 2005 and is shown in Figure 1. C. Study Area Delineation The project impact study area will include all roadway segments where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour maximum service flow rate of the segment. The study area will also include signalized intersections where project traffic comprises 4.5% or more of intersection capacity. D. Capacity Analysis Although the study area will be based on full DRI traffic, much of the DRI traffic is already on the roadway system and will be included in the traffic counts. To avoid double counting, the amount of external traffic from existing Park Place development will be calculated using ITE Trip Generation, 6`" Edition. The amount of external trips from the built portion will be deducted from existing traffic and only new (unbuilt) Park Place traffic will be added. This is the same procedure that was approved and used in the 1994 NOPC traffic analysis. Due to the interconnecting of parking areas with non-DRI businesses actual driveway counts should not be used to determine existing DRI traffic. New (unbuilt) traffic will be added to accumulate background traffic to estimate total expected traffic in the revised buildout year (2003). The projected volumes in the revised buildout year will be compared to those projected for the original buildout year (1991). Roadway segments where projected 2003 volume exceeds the originally approved volume will be analyzed in detail to determine PM peak hour LOS and improvements. This analysis will be done on a peak hour basis in accordance with FDOT 1998 LOS Handbook practices. ' Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 4 VI. CONCLUSION Existing conditions will be established by obtaining traffic counts in the vicinity of the project and analyzing traffic conditions using HCS and FDOT ART-TAB/ART-PLAN software. Background traffic will be adjusted to the revised buildout year using a calculated annual growth rate based on screenlines. External trip generation will be estimated using ITE Trip Generation, 6`h Edition, with appropriate internal capture, transit capture and pass-by capture. Project traffic will be distributed to the roadway system using FSUTMS and roadway where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more ' of the LOS D peak hour "capacity" will be included in the study area. Projected 2003 traffic will be compared with originally approved traffic and roadways where the approved volume would be exceeded will be analyzed in detail. For these roads analyzed in detail the expected LOS and ' improvements necessary will be determined. These improvements will be compared to those in the original Development Order. :es RApark place.wpd ENTERPRISE RD Q? \ 9. _2%_ 0 0 H ?w J J N? : c L U SUNSET PINT RD. ^% 3% ? MAIN ST w P 4 ' pl Q H N CR 590 J :D U V) N? ^ , QL _ ? \ N ' DREW ST. ra N 7_ 87 _317 e% _7% _2% H CLEVELAND ST. ^? = ST 10% 13% - N 167 20% 221 - - 36% 201 6% S% - - GULF TO N L BA z, BLVD.- N? ' DRUID RD. P 4 Y NURSERY RD, 2% BELLEAIR RD: 1: -y H d } HAINES BAYSH?RE Q X w ' w = Z U w J w w Y - 1% 3% - - - - EAST BAY DR ROOSEVELT < ' L N ' DESCRIPTION: PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PROJECT No. 172-07 DATE: FIGURE: ' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 7/00 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC 1995 2010 AGR A-A 216,059 229,003 0.40% B-B 209,736 227,771 0.56% C-C 135,817 154,864 0.88% ' D-D 119,025 125,314 0.35% C SUNSET POINT RD, B w a J N U DREW ST. CLEVELAND ST, GULF TO BAY BLV . DRUID RD. C A NURSERY RD, ' BELLEAIR RD. Q Li w = Z U W J ' w w y pq EAST BAY DR ' DESCRIPTION: ENTERPRISE RDI'0? 0 0 m z w D J J MAIN ST B CR 590 D HAINES BAYSHORE ROOSEVELT S 1 d A d c? Z) PARK PLACE DRI SCREENLINE GROWTH RATES DATE: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 7/00 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 ' Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC A PROJECT No. 172-07 FIGURE: CITY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337584748 Telephone (727) 5624567 Fax(727)5624576 CASE SUMMARY FLS2002-07059 355 S PARK PL LAKESIDE AT PARK PLACE Flexible Standard Development application approval Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the side_ setbacks from 10 feet to five feet and reduce the rear setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet under the provisions of Section 2-703. PEOPLE Role Name/Address Owner CLINTON COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC / 3225 AVIATION AVE COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 Owner EDWARD MAZUR FLORIDA DESIGN CONS] 2639 MCCORMICK DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33759 FEES: FLS2002-07059 Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due Flex Std-Commercial $475.00 $475.00 $0.00 Total $475.00 $475.00 $0.00 CONDITIONS Fire Condition Joseph Colbert Not Met Building must be fully sprinklered as per Florida Building Code 2001, Sec. 903.8 Show prior to permitting. 09/16/2002 1 FL,62002-07059 35E,_S PfaRkPL Joseph Colbert . Not Met A Fire Alarm System is required as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2001, Section 38.3.4 Show prior to permitting. Landscape Mark Parry Not Met a) There are several areas around the proposed building indicated as "sod"; these areas should be properly landscaped. Utilizing some sod is fine as long as it's part of an overall design scheme; b) None of the landscape islands in the parking area have groundcover or shrubs indicated - there needs to be something other than sod in these islands; c) Landscape islands need to be a minimum of 8 feet (inside dimension; back to back of curb) with minimum of 150 square feet in area; d) The size of shade trees may be reduced from four-inch caliper; 12 feet in height to 2.5-inch caliper, 10 feet in height; e) Overall, the landscape plan should match the other office buildings in the Park Place office complex in terms of quality; f) The above comments can be addressed during the building permit phase. Zoning Condition Mark Parry Not Met • Provide additional space near the dumpster at the north end of the site, provide adequate space/angle for the loading space near the western entrance of the building and provide required handicap striping, to the satisfaction of staff; Meet Code requirements regarding tree replacement or pay the fee in-lieu of replacement; and Provide a written agreement from the City of St. Petersburg regarding the proposed paving of the 50-foot easement that extends along the east end of the site. ACTIVITIES Description . Disp Done By Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Application received DONE MTP 7/25/02 also see case FLS 00-05-35 D.O. Mailed Out 7/29/02 Documents attached in 7/29/02 Drainage Calculation DONE MTP 7/29/02 8/8/02 Engineering Review HOLD MEL 7/29/02 1) Need to show 8" water main connection from the internal loop to the existing 12" water main on Hampton Road. May conflict with proposed storm. 2) Compactor to be relocated because of conflict with existing 8" water main. There exists a 10' blanket water main easement (O.R. 6386-1058). 3) Core existing man hole for sanitary sewer connection. 4) All water main connections to the existing 8" main shall be a tapping sleeve and 1 provided by the City, paid for by the applicant. 5) Concrete sidewalk that connects lease parking area to the west: What is going t( happen to this? 35.. K PL Fire Review HOLD J_C 7/29/02 8/1/02 Additional Fire Hydrant required. Provide a Fire Department Connection located at least 15 feet from the building anc within 40 feet of a fire hydrant. Both of the above to be shown on the site plan prior to a Development Order. See Conditions. Land. Resource Review HOLD R_A 7/29/02 A tree inventory is required, an inventyory was performed by me some time ago, resubmit for my review. Landscaping Review DONE MTP 7/29/02 8/16/02 see conditions Legal Review DONE MTP 7/29/02 7/29/02 Letter To Abutting Prop DONE MT? 7/29/02 7/31/02 Letter of Completeness DONE MTP 7/29/02 7/29/02 Map. Created DONE MTP 7/29/02 7/29/02 n/a Park & Rec Review DONE DWR 7/29/02 8/5/02 No P&R Comment since located in an exempt area (Park Place). Site Visit DONE MTP 7/29/02 8/5/02 Solid Waste Review PASS 7/29/02 Suggest 14X28 pad 220 power 3 phase 60 amp service Stormwater Review DONE BAB 7/29/02 8/16/02 a) Confirm that this is Park Place Pond E4 and that the development is on Tract 2A Traffic Eng Review HOLD 7/29/02 8/14/02 a) need dimensioning for all parking areas, drive aisles, handicap spaces and acce: aisles, loading areas, driveways, etc. b) need handicap detail meeting current City standards. c) connect loading zone to main entrance with sidewalk. Items a - c to be addressed prior to issuance of Development Order. Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Tree Survey Recd DONE R -A 7/29/02 8/12/02 Verify Traffic Impact Fees 7/29/02 Zoning Review DONE MT? 7/29/02 8/8/02 see conditions F:\PPLAN\forms\lnfoSummary.rpt 3 DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EXISTING) ACCESS MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL oa AREA 0 0 w P? PARCEL 2 vi r _ OFFICE 41,? Z 82,179 SF OFFICE m° MULTI-FAMILY fk? 101,900 SF (6PARCEL 8R PARCEL 4 156 D.U. CONSTRUCTION) (107,900 SF EXISTING) P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) J Qv FUTURE COMMERICAL A- ACCESS Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (RETAIL) 55,278 SF (120.560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) PARCEL 7 QF_ I- I-eE (55.276 SF EXIST ON 220,560 SF PARCELS 7 AND 9) C? OMMERCIA PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 (11,303 SF EXISTING) (14,539 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERICAL 25,842 SF LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF COMMERICAL OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOMEVER MILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT MAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF UGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SO ARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WLL BE UMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MUL71-FAMILY UNITS WTH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WTH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHED FOR PARCEL 6. (RETAIL) (25.642 EF EXISTING) FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYOiG B PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT•B'TO ^ Inn zx•<.n - r... In Pz• ecoc PARK PLACE DR] NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 N wm? 0 150 300 DREW STREET PARCEL 3 MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST) 0 a 0 rn ? MJ Lri a Z 0 !tl EXISTING ACCESS OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82.179 SF UNDER CONSTRUCTION) OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EXISTING) NATURAL AREA 0 PARCEL 2 v OJ m MULTI-FAMILY 156 D.U. V4 P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Q? ?k QP PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120.560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLNJNED) QF-F-k--E 220,560 SF COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55.278 SF EXIST ON / PARCELS 7 AND 9) f/ COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 (71,303 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL 25,842 SF LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU , 390 DU NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENY. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1.000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL I AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE §5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIOENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 IINITC ARF .1-Y 11-1 I- - -- c (RETAIL) (25,642 SF EXISTING) FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTP eTe, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS PARK PLACE D R I MASTER D E VE L 0 P M E N T PLAN EXHIBIT '8'TDi'IT?nEiiMe,n f B PARK PLACE DRI NOPL MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 EXISTING ACCESS 0 0 o= 0 a x FUTURE ACCESS DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EXISTING) MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL C3 ¢o AREA I m ? O Q OFFICE PARCEL 2 z Z - J 82,179 SF 10F ol0Cs m° MULTI-FAMILY 7 PARCEL 8 PARCEL 4 156 D. U. Q x (BCONSTRUCTON? (101,900 SF EXISTING) P (156 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST) f 1 Q? COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,275 SF EXIST ON / PARCELS 7 AND 9) f/ Q? PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) QFF-2E 220,560 -SF U PARCEL 10 (11.303 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14.539 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,642 SF EXISTING) EXISTING ACCESS FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF COMMERICAL OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL . 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU , 390 OU NOTE 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WLL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LICHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHEO ON PARCEL I AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 05722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND 6. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHFO FOR PARCFI R. .,,...._., FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 4I ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAUSTS, SURVEYORS S PLANNERS P A R K PLACE D R I MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT'B'TO nlhnc'.:e, PARK PLACE DRI NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL D 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EXISTING) MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. MST) EXISTING ACCESS o NATURAL ao AREA a _ OFFICE PARCEL 2 Z 82,179 SF OFFICE 0°J MULTI-FAMILY 101,900 SIF PARCEL D PARCEL 4 156 D.U. (BCONSTRU nON (101,900 SF EXISTING) P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 2 PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 55,278 SF (120.560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) PARCEL 7 QF V>E (55,278 5F EXIST AN ON 220, 560 SF zj( PARCELS 7 7 AND 9) COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 (11.303 SF EXISTING) \ J? ?? f (14.539 SF EXISTING) GU COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25.842 SF EXISTING) LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182.179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU , 390 DU EXISTING ACCESS NOTES: 1. THEE PROPOSOED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS AR BASED N BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF UGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHEO ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100.000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 744 UNITS ARF HFRFRY FSTARI ISHFD CDR PARPn G FUTURE ACCESS w FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. a ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAUSTS, SURVEYORS A PLANNER, P ARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT' TO PARK PLACE DR] NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 N 0 150 300 DREW STREET PARCEL 3 MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100.DOD SF EXISTING) EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL (3 ¢o AREA _ OFFICE PARCEL 2 Z ) I- 0 82,179 SF 1OFFII?CS ° MULTI-FAMILY PARCEL 8 PARCEL 4 (82,179 SF UNDER 156 D . U . Q CONSTRUCTION) (101,90D SF EXISTNG) ?y P (156 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST) ?? QV COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF EXIST ON / PARCELS 7 AND 9) F/ ll_? Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120.560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) QF_ 1- 2 E 220,560 SF I PARCEL 10 ILJ (11,303 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25.842 V EXISTING) ACCESS FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF COMMERICAL OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WU_ NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENY. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SO ARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 85722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1WLL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3. 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL F_ BFLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS. ENVIPONMENTALIETS. SURVEYORS B PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXH181T T, TO ??x+l+i.ssw PARK PLACE DRI NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST) EXISTING ACCESS a NATURAL o AREA rn a OFFICE PARCEL 2 it 82,179 SF OFFICE m°J MULTI-FAMILY 101,900 SF PARCEL 8 a (82,179 SF UNDER PARCEL 4 156 D.U. CONSTRUCTION) (101,900 SF EXISTING) P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EAST) ?` Qv COMMERICAL \ (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF EXIST ON PARCELS 7 AND 9) OMMERCIA PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 (11,303 SF EXISTING) U I PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120.560 SF OFFICE EX ISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) QF_ I- I-CE 220,560 SF COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14.539 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) EXISTING ACCESS FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF COMMERICAL OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU NOTES 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTTHE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1.000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SO ARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE ,#5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WALL BE UMITED TO PARCELS 2. 3. 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS NTH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCFI R_ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Ls9C0 ENGINEERS, ENVIPONMENTALISTS. 4URVET0448 PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT T'TO PARK PLACE DRI NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 N O 150 300 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) EXISTING ACCESS 0 0 o+ ? w ?. ~ 0 OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82.179 SF UNDER CONSTRUCTION) DREW STREET PARCEL 1 OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL \ (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55.278 EXIST ON PARCELS LS 7 AND 9) OMMERCIA PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 (11,303 SF EXISTING)\ GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD NATURAL AREA 0 PARCEL 2 OJ m MULTI-FAMILY 156 D.U. G? P (156 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST)/,;, Q? QP PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120.560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) QFF-I-OE 220,560 SF COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL 25,842 SF EXISTING ACCESS 0 O Of O CL FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU NOTE : AN UNDEVELOPEOTO T. TARE HE PBASED ROPOSEDONAMOUNTAVAILAB BEST OF SQULEAREMARKETFOOTAGEORINFFMATIONOR INDIVIDUALARE S PARCELSCHANGE D BJECT U THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2001 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTASUSHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE UNITED TO PARCELS 2, 3. 6 AND 8. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100.000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2,40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARF HFRFRY FCTARII- FOR PARFFI R (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) r FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 4 xO0. fENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYOiS 9 PLANNERS PARK PLACE D R I MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT R'TO PARK PLACE OR[ NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 DREW STREET N PARCEL i ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) EXISTING ACCESS , o NATURAL a AREA 0 ° Of O _ OFFICE PARCEL 2 Z OFFICE 0°J MULTI-FAMILY 0 82,179 SF ) (L v 101,900 SF PARCEL 8 PARCEL 4 156 D.U. a ( consiRUFCnoNjTI (101,900 SF E%ISnNC) . 4, P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) ?? Qv COMMERICAL \ (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF E%157 ON PARCELS 7 AND 9) OMMERCIA PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 (11,303 SF EXISTING)\, Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) QFF-I-,E 220,560 SF COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14.539 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERICAL 25,842 SF ACCESS FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABUSHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 95722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT YALL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3. 6 AND 8. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNI15, OR 1,000 IF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS PATH A MAXIMUM OF 2aa 11u1tt ARi HFRCaY icTe Rl Icucn rna Peorn r (RETAIL) (25.842 SF EXISTING) FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC •_?„ .. ,,.,, ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, 60X". -11 !PLANNERS PARK PLACE D R I MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT'B'TD i6 Izzzl xx+.e+rx . r... Izzzlzz+-esa PARK PUCE ORI NOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST EXISTING ACCESS o NATURAL ao AREA O °a _ OFFICE PARCEL 2 Z 82,179 SF 10FF?I?CS 0°J MULTI-FAMILY PARCEL 8 PARCEL 4 156 D.U. Q (62,179 SF UNDER = CONSTRUCTION) (101,900 3 EXISTING) P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EAST) COMMERICAL \ (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55.226 SF EXIST AN ON PARCELS 7 7 AND 9) OMMERCIA PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL (11.303 SF EXISTING) ll_ PARCEL 10 Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120,560 sF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) QFFF-k-,E 220,560 SF / COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERICAL 25,842 SF EXISTING ACCESS FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 222,460 S 182,179 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100;000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU , 390 DU NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMDUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER MILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1.000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL I AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE UMITED TO PARCELS 2. 3, 6 AND B. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS Wi TH A MAXIMUM OF 744 UNITS ARF HFRFRY FSTARIISHFD FDP P11- R (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) YR 5 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. a .e ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SIIRVEYD.9G8PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 'WTO PARKPLACEORINOPC MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 1 • DREW STREET N PARCEL 1 LAND USEEXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAILS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 81,1 20 SF 0 81,120 SF COMMERICAL 0 150 300 ~oo, 000 PARCEL 3 (100,000 SF EXISTING) OFFICE. 222;460~~~ SF 182,179 SF 404,639 SF ExisTi ACCE MULTI-FAMILY EXISTING ACCESS LT. INDUSTRIAL 100~~000~SF 100,000 SF 20,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY. 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU PRESIDENTIAL 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) 403, 580 SF .282,179 SF 685, 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL Q AREA 0 ~ ~O w Q- PARCEL 2 0 ~Q OFFICE I _ _ _ - - - OFFICE --~--u-- 82,179 SF MULTI-FAMILY 101,900 SF ~ (BPAs sE uNO R PARCEL 4 15 6 U. z CONSTRUCTION) (101,900 SF EXISTING) G~ (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Q ~P F FUTURE ACCESS COMMERICAL Q~ PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (RETAIL) NOTES: 5 5 ~ Z~ B i S F 020,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE. BASED ON BEST. AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND .ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. PARCEL 7' OFEI~G1E THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE D~VEL'OPMENT ORDER. c55,278 SF EXIST ON 2 2 0, 5 6 0 S F 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO PARCELS 7 AND':9) AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT". THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND .FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. OMMERCIA 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 " P;'~RCEL 10 PARCEL 11 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND (11,303 SF. EXISTING) (14,539 SF EXISTING) 8. E 5, PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000' SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF a GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF QFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF R 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHEQ FOR PARCEL 6. COMMERICAL 25, 842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) s a DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE GUALITV PREPARED FOR. p CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE - INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED g DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED DESIGN CONSUL m.,FANTS, INC. o. AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS MAP H AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. le 9 . CHECKED aa ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS,. SURVEYORS & PLANNERS PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVEL 639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 337 9 VELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT "B" TO L (727) 724-8422 - Fax. (727)724-806 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 Q.C. g ?.PARK PLACE DRI NOPC