The URL can be used to link to this page

DRI1988-09-01 (?l C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748 January 30, 1989 Attached please find a certified copy of Ordinance No. 4770-89 constituting a Development Order for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Department of the City Clerk City of Clearwater ?osl-narked ?I31 ., f ''Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748 January 30, 1989 Attached please find a certified copy of Ordinance No. 4770-89 constituting a Development Order for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Department of the City Clerk City of Clearwater ?osl-rria,?k? ?I3j recd ?'bf P? ?a ?V Fi ?s ''Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Northerly 408.21 feet of Parcel D (also known as Site V, Sand Key) being a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: For a point of reference commence at the Section corner common to Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20 of said Township and Range, as now established as having the coordinates (based on the Pinellas County Grid System) of North 16500.72, East 31452.98; thence run N89010'31"E, along the Section line dividing said Sections 17 and 20, a distance of 843.47 feet to an intersection with the center- line of Gulf Boulevard (State Road No. 208) as now established as a 100 foot right of way; thence S42013'31"W along said centerline a distance of 263.93 feet to a point; thence N47 46'29"W, a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwesterly right of way line of said Gulf Boulevard; thence run N42013'31"E, along said Northwest- erly right of way line, a distance of 241.79 feet for the point of Beginning; thence continue N4201331"E along said right of way a distance of 408.21 feet; thence run N47046'29"W, a distance of (776.5 feet more or less deed) (1391 feet more or less field) to the mean high water line (elevation 1.2 feet N.G.V.D. dated 9/23/87), of the Gulf of Mexico; thence run Southerly along said mean high water line a distance of 475 feet more or less to a point that lies N4704629"W, and 1149 feet more or less distant from the Point of Beginning; thence run S47046'29"E, a distance of 1149 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning, containing 11.9588 acres more or less. SSK1:42 VIP^41Ie- C'\It? Wade-Trim C°-1 L1%.:?l ILb.-IdL 1 1 •. .-M.YN+•• tM.. t L. wY.. i H Cx1 ? ' ? I W 1 ? 1 1 I ?" c tub l\ .r.s...r. II " 1. i ...•.. nv ...CTCC CITE DI Al rs& 1V 1.1V,... ...n.t. r.. v... ?.... SAND KEY RESORT HOTEL EDSA C'I..r:Al?\WAI-I:I; BFACI I, FLORIDA -?w_ ORDINANCE NO. 4770-89 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, CONSTITUTING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 19, 1987, the Grand Couloir Corporation (the "Developer") filed an Application for Development Approval (which together with later filed sufficiency responses is hereafter referred to as the "ADA") for a Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") with the City of Clearwater ("City"), the Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA"), and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1988), ("Chapter 380"); and WHEREAS, the ADA proposes the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort (the "Development"), which expansion shall include, among other things, a new hotel and major meeting facility to be located on a vacant 11.96 acre site adjacent to the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds the Development to be in the public interest in that it provides a major meeting facility, the size and nature of which does not otherwise exist in Pinellas County (the "County") and which facility will support the City's efforts to attract visitors and to encourage year-round recreation and tourist activities; and WHEREAS, the City Commission also finds the Development to be in the public interest in that the Development will create a significant sand dune system which will provide a viable habitat for coastal flora and fauna and will provide storm protection for upland properties including protection for the County owned parkland to the north of the Development; and WHEREAS, the City Commission is the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction over the DRI and is authorized and empowered to consider ADAs and to issue development orders which permit development consistent with the ADA; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380 have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has on January 5, 1989, held a properly noticed public hearing on the ADA and has heard and considered testimony and documents received thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has received and considered the report and recommendations of the TBRPC; and WHEREAS, all interested parties and members of the public were afforded an opportunity to participate in the hearing on the DRI before the City Commission; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida: Secticn 1. Findings of Fact. Pursuant to Section 380.06(15), Florida Statutes (1988), the City Commission makes the following findings of fact with respect to the Development: A. This Ordinance shall constitute the development order ("Order") of the City Commission, issued in response to the ADA filed by the Developer for the Development. The scope of development to be permitted pursuant to the Order includes the land use operations and activities described in the ADA, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. B. The real property which is the subject of the ADA is located within the municipal boundaries of the City and is legally described as set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. C. The Development will include a 428 suite hotel tower, along with amenities, and a second tower comprised of either 322 hotel suites or 267 residential units. The Development will also include approximately 30,000 square feet of meeting space which will allow grand ballroom seating for approximately 1,400 people. The Development is proposed to be constructed in a single phase over a ten (10) year build-out period. -2- D. The proposed Development is not an area of critical state concern as is defined by Chapter 380. E. All development shall occur in accordance with this order and the ADA. F. The Development is further governed by two (2) Settlement Stipulations entered into in the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, Civil Case No. 78-4765-7 and Civil Case No. 83-14905-7 ("Stipulations"), which Stipulations establish development rights and responsibilities for the Development and with which this Order is consistent. G. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Development has been conducted by the City and the TBRPC. H. The Development is in the overriding public interest. Based on the uncontraverted sworn testimony presented to the City by Erik J. Olsen, P.E., a recognized coastal engineering expert, the Development does not disturb all or a portion of a significant sand dune system and, in fact, creates a significant sand dune sy=tem, which system will provide a viable habitat for coastal flora and fauna and will provide storm protection for upland properties and the County owned park north of the Development. The sand dunes now located on the Development site are in the early stages of formation and relocation will not cause irreparable harm to the natural beach system. The sand dunes now located on the Development site do not constitute all or a portion of a significant sand dune system. The newly created sand dune system provides at least 10:1 mitigation for disturbance of the natural beach system. I. The Development will occur on property which does not constitute a "beach" or "preservation" area but is upland property which lies landward of the newly created dune system. Development will occur more than 400 feet from the mean high water line. J. The Development is in the public interest in that it provides a major meeting facility within the City, -3- which facility supports the City's efforts to attract visitors and to encourage year-round recreation and tourist activities. K. The Development is in the public interest in that it incorporates significant measures to protect loggerhead sea turtles and Kemps Ridley sea turtles. Such measures are set forth in the ADA and include lighting control, construction of indigenous landscaping, and careful maintenance of the beach area. The Developer has further committed to incorporate a permanent sea turtle hatchery under the direction of the Department of Natural Resources ("DNR") and the Clearwater Marine Science Center. Section 2. Conclusions of Law. Pursuant to Section 380.06(15), Florida Statutes (1988), the City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, draws the following conclusions of law: A. The proceedings regarding the ADA have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations and, based upon the record in these proceedings, the Developer and the various departments of the City are authorized to conduct development as described herein, subject to the conditions, restrictions and limitations set forth in this Order. B. Review by the City, the TBRPC and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts of the Development are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, within the terms and conditions of this Order and the ADA. To the extent that the ADA is inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Order, the terms and conditions of this Order shall prevail. C. The Development is consistent with the adopted local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations. D. The proposed Development will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted c-ate Land Develooment Plan applicable to the area. E. This Order is consistent with the report and recommendations of the TBRPC and satisfies the provisions of Section 380.06(15), Florida Statutes (1988). F. The Developer shall honor its commitments set forth in the ADA, a copy of which commitments is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein. G. The sand dunes now located on the Development site are in the early stages of formation and relocation will not cause irreparable harm to the natural beach system. The sand dunes now located on the Development site do not constitute all or a portion of a significant sand dune system. H. The Development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan adopted pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1988), the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan and the State Comprehensive Plan, and the Stipulations. 1. The Development does not disturb all or a portion of a significant sand dune system. J. The Development does not occur on property which constitutes "beach" or "preservation" area. K. The Development is in the overriding public interest based on the following factors: (1) The Development does not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare of the property of others, and, in fact, it provides protection for upland properties, including the County owned park to the north of the Development; (2) The Development will not adversely affect the -conservation of fish and wildlife, including endangered or threatened species, or their habitats, but will, in fact, create a significant habitat for sea turtles, including -5- the construction of a permanent sea turtle hatchery, which hatchery will be constructed and maintained under the supervision of the Clearwater Marine Science Center; (3) The Development, including the newly created sand dune system and turtle hatchery, will be of a permanent nature; (4) The Development will not adversely affect significant historical or archeological resources, pursuant to Section 267.067, Florida Statutes; and (5) The current condition and relative value of functions being performed by areas affected by the Development will not be degraded and, in fact, the Development will create a significant and beneficial sand dune system, provide additional protection for sea turtles and will create a permanent sea turtle hatchery, and will provide a world class hotel and major meeting facility which will attract visitors and encourage the City's year-round recreation and tourist activities. L. The Development is consistent with the TBRPC Policies 9.1.2, 9.2.1 and 10.3.1, 10.3.3 and 10.6.2, F.R. Section 3. General Conditions. Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the ADA is hereby approved, subject to the following general conditions, restrictions and limitations: A. Any change to the Development which meets the criteria set forth in Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1988), shall constitute a substantial deviation. B. Nondiscriminatory emplo.vment opportunities shall be provided by the Developer. C. All outstanding amounts for initial review by the TBRPC shall be paid by the Developer within fifteen (15) days after receipt of a proper invoice therefor. D. Payment for any future activities of the TBRPC with regard to the Development, including but not limited to monitoring or enforcement actions, shall be paid to the TBRPC by the Developer in accordance with the DRI Fee Schedule in effect at that time. E. The Developer shall submit an annual report on the DRI to the City, the TBRPC and the DCA not later than sixty (60) days following the anniversary of the effective date of this Order for each year up to and including such time as all terms and conditions of this Order are satisfied or this order has expired by its terms, whichever is earlier. Such report shall be submitted to the City Commission for review to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Order. The Developer shall be notified of any City Commission hearing wherein such report is to be reviewed. Each report shall contain (i) a description of all development activity conducted pursuant to the Order during the year immediately preceding the submission of the annual report; (ii) a description of all Development activities proposed to be conducted under the terms of this Order for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the annual report; (iii) a statement listing anticipated applications for Development approvals or permits required pursuant to applicable regulations which the Developer proposes to submit in the year immediately following the submittal of the annual report; (iv) a statement setting forth the name and address of any assignee or successor in interest to the Developer in its capacity as a developer of the Development or any portion thereof; and (v) a statement that all persons have received copies as required by law. F. The definitions contained in Chapter 380 shall control the interpretation and construction of the terms of this Order. -7- G. Construction of the Development shall commence on or before June 30, 1992. H. Site plans submitted by the Developer which are substantially consistent with the preliminary conceptual master site plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein, shall be approved by the City. I. This Order shall expire ten (10) years after its effective date. This expiration date reasonably reflects the time required to complete the Development. Any development activity for which plans have been submitted to the City for approval prior to the expiration of this order may be completed, if approved. This Order may be extended by the City Commission upon the finding of excusable delay in any proposed development activity. J. During the effective period of this Order, the City shall not rezone or otherwise reduce the intensity or density permitted by this Order and the Stipulations, nor otherwise decrease the development rights approved by this Order. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit legally enacted changes in zoning or land use regulations which do not decrease the development rights granted to the Developer under this Order and by the Stipulations. K. This Order shall be binding upon the Developer, its assigns or successors in interest. L. The City Manager of the City is responsible for ensuring compliance with this Order. Monitoring shall be accomplished by review of the annual report, building permits, certificates of occupancy, plats, if applicable, and by on-site observation. M. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send certified copies of this Order within five (5) days after the passage of this ordinance to the Developer, the TBRPC, and the DCA. N. This Order shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies of this Order to the recipients specified in Chapter 380. 0. The Developer shall record a Notice of Adoption of this Order pursuant to Chapter 380, and shall furnish the City Clerk a copy of the recorded notice. Section 4. Specific Conditions. The following specific conditions, restrictions, and limitations shall apply to the Development: A. Environment and Natural Resources. 1. In order to protect and enhance the natural values of preservation areas, which by definition include significant sand dune systems, no dredging, filling or development activities shall be allowed, without DNR approval, and as committed in the ADA. The sand dunes now located on the Development site do not constitute all or a portion of a significant sand dune system. 2. In the event that any species listed in Sections 39-27.003-.005, F.A.C., are observed frequenting the site for nesting, feeding, or breeding, proper protection/mitigation measures shall be employed immediately in cooperation with the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission ("FGFWFC") and DNR. 3. Measures designed to protect loggerhead sea turtles and Kemps Ridley sea turtles, including, at a minimum, the procedures referenced on pages 18-2 and 18-3 of the ADA, pages 1-6 and 2-11 of the First Sufficiency Response, and page 2 of the Second Sufficiency Response, as well as the August 9, 1988, letter from DNR, shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the DNR Bureau of Marine Research. These measures shall be financed, built, and maintained by the Developer, and shall be in place prior to the issuance by the City of any temporary or final certificates of occupancy for the Development. The temporary hatchery which currently exists on the site shall be maintained through the construction period of the first -9- tower and the dune system as described in the ADA. Protection of the turtle hatchery during all phases of construction shall be supervised by the Clearwater Marine Science Center. 4. Sea oat revegetation and planned sand dune system preservation/enhancement activities, public education, and maintenance procedures (including appropriate pedestrian management constraints) shall be required of the Developer, as committed in the ADA, at a. minimum, and shall be reviewed by the University of South Florida Department of Marine Sciences and the TBRPC, and reviewed and approved by FGFWFC, DNR, and the City. A plan addressing these operations shall be submitted to and approved by each of these agencies[prior to issuance of any building permits for the Development. The plan shall designate the entity(ies) to carry out monitoring, which is to be conducted on a semi- annual basis for four (4) years after preservation/enhancement activities have been completed. Monitoring shall be required during construction of the second tower referenced in the ADA and for a period of four (4) years after completion of that facility. Monitoring results shall be included in annual reports. Maintenance of the planned dune system and sea oats revegetation area shall be the responsibility of the Developer. No mechanized beach cleaning operations shall be permitted on the sand dunes. 5. The discovery of any historical or archaeological resources shall be reported to the Florida Division of Historical Resources ("DHR") and the disposition of such resources shall be determined in cooperation with the DHR and the City. B. Public Safety. 1. The Developer shall promote awareness of, and shall cooperate with, local and regional authorities having jurisdiction to issue hurricane evacuation orders. The Developer shall prepare a plan to ensure the safe and orderly evacuation of residents, hotel guests and those -:0- employees who, for security or administrative reasons, are in the building after an evacuation order is issued by (1) ordering all buildings closed for the duration of a hurricane evacuation order; (2) informing all employees and guests of evacuation routes out of the flood prone area and measures to be followed in such event; (3) assisting in providing alternative accommodation arrangements for hotel guests outside of the evacuation area; (4) assisting in providing transportation for employees and hotel guests to these alternative accommodations; and (5) making all efforts to coordinate with and inform appropriate public authorities of building closings, security and safety measures, and evacuation plans. The plan shall meet the requirements of Rule 9J-2.0256, F.A.C., and shall show how the Developer will mitigate impacts on hurricane evacuation clearance times and primary public hurricane shelters. The plan shall be subject to review and approval by local emergency management officials and shall be included in the first annual report submitted after occupancy of any portion of the Development. 2. All deeds for sale and/or long-term and seasonal lease agreements of residential units and business facilities within the Development shall be accompanied by a hazard disclosure statement generally describing the possibility of damage from hurricane storm surge. 3. There shall be no development seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line, except as provided by Chapter 161, Florida Statutes (1988), and as otherwise permitted by this Order. Elevations for all habitable structures shall comply with applicable federal flood insurance regulations and, except to the extent otherwise authorized hereby, shall be at or above base flood elevation and shall comply with state and local coastal zone building regulations. 4. The soil conservation measures referenced on pages 14-2 of the ADA and pages 1-10 and 2-10 of the _11_ First Sufficiency Response, and the measures to reduce erosion, fugitive dust and air emissions referenced on page 13-1 of the ADA, at a minimum, shall be implemented. C. Public Facilities. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the final drainage plan for the Development shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulation ("DER") the TBRPC for review and to the Southwest Florida Water Management District ("SWFWMD") and the City for review and approval. The following parameters shall be included in the final drainage plan: 1. The proposed stormwater management system shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to meet or exceed Chapter 17-25, F.A.C., and SWFWMD Rule 40D-4, as well as the Stormwater and Lake System Maintenance and Design Guidelines, (TBRPC, 1978). The system shall treat the first three-quarter inch of runoff from the site, as required by SWFWMD. Treatment shall be provided by biological filtration, and shall incorporate an oil and grease skimmer. 2. Best Management Practices for reducing water quality impacts, as recommended by SWFWMD, shall be implemented wherever feasible, including a cleaning program for driveways and parking areas within the Development. 3. Design and siting of the drainage system shall be consistent with TBRPC Policies 9.1.2, 9.2.1 and 10.3.1, F.R. D. Energy and Water Conservation Measures. The energy and water conservation measures referenced in the ADA shall be required. The following energy conservation measures shall be utilized for the Development if economically feasible: 1. Energy use monitoring and energy conservation efforts, using a qualified energy use analyst. An energy audit by Florida Power Corporation may satisfy part of this effort. 2. Programs to promote energy conservation by employees, suppliers, guests, and the public. 3. Programs to reduce levels of operation of all air conditioning, heating, and lighting systems during non-business hours, or night-time, as appropriate. 4. Recycling programs for solid waste. 5. Minimize outdoor signs requiring lighting after business hours. 6. Innovative energy alternatives such as solar energy, resource recovery, waste heat recovery and cogeneration. E. Transportation. 1. The Development will have a negative impact on Gulf Boulevard, from Walsingham to 4th Avenue (approximately one-tenth of a mile). Because of the above described negative impact upon a regionally significant highway facility, approval of this Order is conditioned upon the following: a. When certificates of occupancy have been issued for 428 hotel rooms, (or the equivalent thereof in terms of trip generation) an annual monitoring program to provide peak-hour counts at the Development entrance shall be instituted to verify that the projected number of external trips for the Development are not materially exceeded. Counts will continue on an annual basis through build-out of the Development This information shall be supplied in the required annual report. If an annual report is not submitted within thirty (30) days after its due date, or if the annual report indicates that project trips exceed assumed counts by more than 15%, the City shall conduct a substantial deviation determination pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1988), and may amend this Order to change or require additional roadway improvements. The results of the study may also serve as a basis for the Developer or reviewing agencies to request amendments to this Order. If the project trips exceed assumed counts by more than 15% and if such variance from projected -13- traffic counts is determined to be a substantial deviation, the revised transportation analysis required pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1988), shall be based upon results of the monitoring program and agreements reached at another transportation methodology meeting to be held prior to preparation of the new analysis. b. The Developer shall prepare and implement a Transportation Systems Management ("TSM") program upon issuance of certificates of occupancy for 428 hotel rooms (or the equivalent number of residential units in terms of trip generation) which will divert a number of vehicle trips from the PM peak hour consistent with the assumptions used to prepare the ADA. The plan shall be reviewed by the City, Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority ("PSTA"), the County MPO, the TBRPC and the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT"). (1) The TSM program shall include a yearly assessment of the actual achievement of vehicle trips diverted from the peak hour as a result of the TSM measures. This assessment shall also include sufficient and appropriate documentation for all diversions claimed as a result of implementation of each TSM measure. Results of the TSM program shall be included in the annual report. (2) If the annual report indicates that the total t=ip diversions are not being met, the City shall conduct a substantial deviation determination pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1988), and may amend this Order to change TSM objectives and/or require additional roadway improvements. The results of the TSM study may serve as a basis for the Developer or reviewing agencies to request amendments to this order. (3) -Issuance of certificates of occupancy shall be contingent upon the Developer's participation in the TSM program. This program shall seek to implement and will be measured by the TSM objectives and policies set forth in the Florida Transportation Plan. -_4- C. Three transportation mitigation options are included in this Order. The Developer shall select the preferred option for transportation mitigation after issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first tower, but not later than commencement of construction of the second and final tower. This timing selection of an option is deemed appropriate because the regional impact does not occur until after the second tower is completed and the only regional facility adversely impacted is undergoing study by the FDOT with regard to planning, design and engineering for capacity expansion. These options are: Option 1 Prior to issuance of any construction permits for the Development, there shall exist funding commitments from responsible entities to construct Gulf Boulevard, from Walsingham Road to Fourth Avenue as a three-lane undivided arterial, at a minimum. In the event Gulf Boulevard is not committed as assumed in the ADA analysis, a new analysis and traffic reassignment shall be required, as appropriate. This Order shall not be construed as a funding commitment by the City to improve Gulf Boulevard. Option 2 In the event that commitments for transportation improvements are adequate to permit approval of only a portion of the Development, the capacity and loading of transportation facilities in the Development transportation area, including but not limited to the widening of Gulf Boulevard, shall be limiting factors in any subsequent approvals. Accordingly, the Developer shall generate and provide the City, the County MPO, the FDOT and the TBRPC, pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.06, Florida Statutes (1988), with updated current traffic counts on the above roadways, and projections of traffic volumes that will result from the completion of the currently approved Development construction, plus that to be generated by the next portion for which the Developer is seeking approval. Each updated traffic analysis shall serve to verify the findings of the DRI traffic analysis (referenced in this Order as option 1) or shall indicate alternate transportation improvements or mechanisms which, when implemented, will maintain the roadway referenced in option 1 at a satisfactory LOS D at peak hour. Both the traffic counts, and the projection of traffic volume, shall be prepared consistent with generally accepted traffic engineering practices. Prior to any specific approval beyond Option 1 approval, the City shall ensure in written findings of fact that the above roadway is operating at or above LOS D at peak hour, and that the expected trips to be generated by such approval would not cause the roadway to operate below LOS D at peak hour. Option 3 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer may elect Option 3 in lieu of Option 1 or 2. It is the intent of option 3 to achieve mitigation in accordance with Rule 9J-2.0255 (7((a)(3) as interpreted by the TBRPC. The Development substantially impacts only one segment of one regionally significant roadway, i.e., Gulf Boulevard from Walsingham Road to Fourth Avenue, and therefore is not a project which is suitable for standard pipeline mitigation. The Devloper's proportionate share contribution has been calculated to be $15,590.00. The three-laning of the impacted section of Gulf Boulevard is in the work plan of the Department of Transportation. The contribution of the proportionate share amount to FDOT =or the acceleration of said improvement is the best and most efficient way to provide reasonable assurance that public transportation facilities shall be made available to accommodate the impact of the Development. Therefore, in accordance with TBRPC Policy 19.8.14 (5), the Developer shall mitigate its transportation impacts under Option 3 by immediately contributing S'_5,590.00 to FDOT for the expressed and sole purpose o. -unding improvements to that -:1 - portion of Gulf Boulevard lying between 4th Avenue and Walsingham Road. The Developer shall pay transportation impact fees for the 428 suite hotel tower pursuant to the fee schedule established by Pinellas County ordinance 86-43. The Developer shall pay any additional transportation impact fees for any additional development pursuant to the fee schedule established by Pinellas County ordinance 88-50, as the same may be amended from time to time. Recognizing that the Developer will pay County transportation impact fees far in excess of the proportionate share contribution calculated pursuant to DCA pipeline transportation policy, the Developer shall receive credit for its proportionate share contribution against impact fees pursuant to law. Section 4. The Coastal Construction Control Line. The Development plan contemplates that development will occur seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The City hereby approves the Development and grants permission to place structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line, in accordance with the ADA and conditioned upon approval of the DNR, pursuant to Chapter 161, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Transfer of Development Richts. Pursuant to Section 136.011 of the City's Land Development Code, the Developer is hereby allowed to transfer Development rights of 42 hotel units or 28 residential dwelling units (condominiums) per acre, for a total of 322 hotel units or 267 residential dwelling units, from the adjoining 18.44 acres of property adjacent to the 10,.2 acres of upland property which Developer owns landward of the coastal construction control line. Section 6. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances expressly and directly in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. -17- Section 7. Severability. Should any part or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid; provided, however, that any such finding of invalidity shall automatically authorize the City, the TBRPC, the DCA or the Developer to request a determination under the provisions of Chapter 380 relative to substantial deviation. Section 8. Effective Date. This Order shall become effective on the date the statutory appeal period expires as set forth in Chapter 380 or, if an appeal is filed, at the conclusion of such appeal, whichever is later. PASSED ON FIRST READING January 5, 1989 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED, AS AMENDED: January 19, 1989 ATTEST: CITY, CLERK ` APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CGRRECTN,eW : , _ X? CITY ATTORNEY 122888 d-16 911\SMS\19468ASDO1 (MME) 007505 th3 I a true and as It ard ?x C i.,c"VELOPER CCMMIM-EN IS The following are developer ocmLitments set forth in the Application for Development Approval (ADA) and Sufficiency Responses which shall be honored by the developer, except as they may be superseded by specific terms of the Development order. 1. As proposed, there will be approximately 300 feet of beach between the mean high water line and the nearest structure. (Page 17-1, ADA *) 2. The developer will meet all applicable design and safety measures required by the City of Clearwater. (Page 1-18, SR **) 3. There will be no conversion from hotel roans to residential units during the renovation of the existing hotel structure. (Page 1-1, SR) 4. Existing, and future, accreted beach lying seaward of the proposed dune system will be available to both the general public, hotel guests and residents. (Page 1-22, SR) " ENVIE2N= AND NATiM RESOURCES Air 5. Wind erosion control will be acccnplished through watering of the soils and sodding, if necessary. (Page 14-2, ADA) L=L 6. No significant clearing or grading of soils is proposed. (Page 14-2, ADA) 7. To prevent soil erosion during and after construction, hay bales and sediment traps will be implemented. The area surrounding new construction will be landscaped, as soon as practical. (Page 1-10, SR) B. Soil erosion and sediment control measures identified in the ADA and sufficiency will be in place at the initiation of construction. (Page 2-10, SR) water 9. A11 stormwater will be treated pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. (Page 15-1, ADA) 10. The first three-quarter inch of runoff will be treated by either filtration system, natural percolation, or both, as required by SWFW-D Chapter 40D-4 and Section 17-25 F.A.C. (Page 1-11, SR) 11. The retained volumes of stormwater runoff will be treated within the detention area. (Page 22-2, ADA) £lQQZlains 12. To compensate for potential flood hazards, all FEMA and City of Clearwater engineering and construction specifications, relevant to construction in the 100 year flood zone, will be adhered to. (Page 17- 1, ADA) 13. A11 permanent habitable structures will be constructed above the designated base flood elevation. (Page 17-1, ADA) 14. By virtue of the proposed project's footprint being partially seaward of the CCCL, the entire major habitable structure will be constructed in accordance with the design standards required by Chapter 161.053 F.S. and Chapter 16B-33 F.A.C for construction seaward of the CCCL. (Page 1-12, SR) 15. The hotel will follow all instru c-- ions (regarding hurricane evacuation) established by the City of Clearwater. (Page 1-12, SR) 23. If, in .ct, archaeological resources re found during project construct-on, the applicant agrees to report such findings, to determine their significance, with the Division of Archives and the City of Clearwater. (Page 19-1, ADA) Drainage 24. The retention /detention pond will be designed to contain the runoff frcrn a 25-year, 24-hour storm event for post--development Conditions, while limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year event under existing conditions, in accordance with SWFWV 40D-4 Regulations and the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Criteria. (Page 1-18, SR) 25. This system will be designed with sufficient capacity to treat discharge, and the required storage, within a maximum retention time of 72 hours as set forth in Chapter 17-25 F.A.C. (Page 22-2, ADA) 26. The detention area will be designed to contain the runoff from 25- year, 24-hour storm event for post-development conditions, while limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year event under existing conditions. (Page 22-1, ADA) 27. The bottom of the pond will be at +4.5 elevation with a maximum of 2' depth. (Page 1-18, SR) 28. This pond will also be designed to treat the first 3/4 inch of runoff from the respective tributary area. Treatment will be provided by percolation. (Page 22-1, ADA) 29. Detention areas will be incorporated into the dune system, and be designed to control the rate of outflow, and impound specified volumes of stormwater for treatment and storage to meet Chapter 40D-4 and 17-25 F.A.C. (Page 22-1, ADA) 30. All new impervious surface will apply with the storrrrwater management requirements of Chapter 40D-4 and 17-25, F.A.C. (Page 15-2, ADA) 31. All inflow and outflow structures will be designed to prevent erosion, scour and washouts. (Page 22-1, ADA) 32. All on-site systems, structures, and detention areas will be maintained by the Owner. (Page 22-2, AIWA) 33. Energy conservation features for the buildings will include: high efficiency insulation, in walls and roofs of the buildings; twin glazing for insulation at windows, if the calculations indicate that .utilization of this feature will, in fact, save energy for a specific building; high-efficiency central air-conditioning equipment; heat recovered from air-conditioning chillers will be used for heating, and domestic hot water; and digital controls, and a microprocessor, will be part of a total energy management system, to achieve efficient operation of all energy consuming environmental systems, including control of the lighting and HVAC systems. (Page 1-21, SR) 34. The recreation facilities on-site will be maintained by the owners. (Page 27-1, ADA) 35. Of the 11.96 acres, approximately 3.0 acres of recreational and open space are to be provided on site. (Page 27-1, ADA) 1% 41 Fierce, Lisa From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:48 AM To: Fierce, Lisa Subject: RE: research assignment - sherton on sand key They are licensed under OCL9016681 at 1160 Gulf Blvd of $11,615 Atlas Page: The property is Zoned: Land Use is: Acreage of Tourist: Acreage of OS/R: Total Acreage: Density for entire property ?l for:' .390 rental units 1 s n a dk bar ----" 20 vending machines (1) 76 seat restaurant (1)1,225 seat restaurant retail store with an inventory approx. 8.953 acres approx. 7.001 acres approx. 15.955 acres Density for property zoned Tourist approx. 15.955 X 30 478.65 dwelling units 8. 9 5 3 9 ,97 w /A x30 X bole 268.59 dwelling units Looks like they are over with regards to density (390 vs 268), Jerry! -----Original Message----- From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: research assignment - sherton on sand key need to know the development potential of the site; how man -thP mow? how many can be added? etc. C? '^ Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department QV 727.562.4561rphone fl.com / 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:39 PM To: Fierce, Lisa Subject: FW: sherton again 294A T and OS/R RFH and R/OS cAe S L more questions. thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Stone, Ralph Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:19 PM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: sherton again in addition if the current level is above or below the current dev. potential; please include this also; thanks 2 t r t Impr-114M V ? ?e) ?.IA lab,m19® Group Services: Engineering Planning Sciences Landscape Architecture ,1, Wade-Trim Ms. Sheila Benz Director of Planning Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: DRI 1179 Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Ms. Benz: September 16, 1988 In response to your letter dated September 2, 1988 requesting additional information, the following is provided: EDUCATION The option of developing Tower Two for 267 condominium units is specified in the ADA and Sufficiency Response. The applicant currently envisions that the condominium units may be marketed for seasonal residents and may be part of the resort's rental pool similar in nature to Innisbrook in Tarpon Springs and/or Saddlebrook in Pasco County. The condominium units are envisioned for use by hotel guests (overnight), vacationing families, empty nestors, corporations, second homes for Tampa Bay residents, and seasonal residents (3 to 4 months). Therefore, the number of school age children will be negligible. A follow up letter has been mailed to Mr. George Wajdowitz, Planning Specialist, Pinellas County Schools (copy enclosed) requesting verification of the School Board's ability to accommodate potentially up to 35 students if the second tower were developed under "normal" residential condominium conditions. TRANSPORTATION Should the second tower be developed as a condominium, it is not appropriate that it be subject to the requirement regarding the improvement of Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham and Fourth Street. The condominium residents and employees will be encouraged to use the parlor and shuttle car service. In addition, trips generated by the development while projected to exceed the regional thresholds (5a), will be offset by the planned improvement of the link which is currently the subject of a corridor study being undertaken by FDOT. Finally, impact fees calculated pursuant to the Pinellas County Impact Fee Ordinance exceed the project's fair share exaction pursuant to the DCA rule (@ TBRPC 5%). The calculations that demonstrate that project traffic will be less than 5 percent of existing Level of Service D volume are reflected in Section 5 of the June 10, 1988 Sufficiency Response entitled Wade-Trim. Inc. Member of the Wade-T.im Group 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard • Suite 334 . Tampa. Florida 33GC 813-221.2090 • telecopier:813-229.0974 Alternate Resident' Al calculations and methodology outlined a trip generation rate of 0.80/trips entire 750 rooms, if the residential is chosen (trip generation rate of impact on the roadway system will therefore, within the existing Level HOUSING Ms. Sheila Benz September 16, 1988 Page 2 (p. 5-6 through 10). Since the in this section were based upon per room for the hotel for the option to build 267 condominiums 0.51 trips per condominium) the be proportionately less and, of Service "D". As noted in the previous response under "Education," the applicant envisions that the condominium option, if employed, will be marketed primarily to seasonal residents (3 to 4 months), hotel guests (overnight), vacationing families, empty nestors, corporations and second homes for Tampa Bay residents. All of these may be part of the resort's rental pool. It is envisioned that the condominiums would be priced comparably with those on Sand Key (i.e. $150,000 or more). As noted in the earlier response, 54 one-bedroom units and 213 two-bedroom units are planned. With respect to proposed densities, as stated in the earlier response by the applicant, densities have been established in the Settlement Stipulation and also include a transference of density from the adjacent property, with City of Clearwater concurrence. Upon your receipt of this final response, we request that notification be provided to the City of Clearwater to set the Public Hearing pursuant to Chapter 380.06 F.S. as no further response are considered necessary other than the response being forwarded directly to you by the school board. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, "DE-TRIM, William A. Executive V INC ckun resident WAO:sjd ZZZ2067.01 Enclosures cc: Kevi n Baker 'Steve Siebert, Esq. Paul a Harvey Al Navarol i Tom Beck Rich Adair _ DBG4:37 CPP^eC-. r 1?[ C 7 LQI..1'L Q?-da Wade-Trim I Wade-Trim September 16, 1988 Mr. George Wajdowicz Planning Specialist Pinellas County Schools P.O. Box 4688 Clearwater, Florida 34618 RE: Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion, DRI 1179 ?krel? Dear Mr. Wajdowicz : L'40 Wade-Trim is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/Application M12=190 For Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S, Group Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort lies immediately Services: south of Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side of Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is enclosed depicting the Engineering site. Planning Sciences The proposal expansion will be developed employing two options: Landscape Architecture Option A: 750 Hotel Suites or Option B: 428 Hotel Suites 267 Condominiums If Option "B" is developed, the applicant envisions the sale of condominiums to seasonal residents (3 to 4 month residency), hotel guest (overnight) vacationing families, empty nesters, corporations, and second home owners from the Tampa Bay Area, consequently the number of school age children will be zero or negligible at best. However, if the condominium were marketed to permanent each residents a potential for 35 students exists when utilizing the generally accepted standard of 0.130 school age children per condominium. It is requested that the your office confirm acceptance of this estimate by response to this letter with a copy forwarded to Ms. Suzanne Cooper, DRI Coordinator, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, 9455 Koger Boulevard Suite 219, St. Petersburg Florida 33702. Wade-Trim. Inc 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard • Suite 334 . Tampa. Florida 33& fAe^_,er of the Wade-Trim Group 813-221-2090 • telecooier 813-229-0974 l Mr. George Wajdowicz September 16, 1988 Page 2 ¦.^NQ E, I 'I I 7 R \t.,'L Ii?-/K Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, DE-TRIM, IN Bonni e . Prins ' Environ to d entist/Planner DRI Coordinator Wade-Trim r Wade-Trim Ll;vqc ki.* A k' A9 Group Services: Ms. Sheila Benz, Director of Planning Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2491 July 30,_1988, Re: Sheraton Sand Key Resort - Sufficiency Response Dear Ms. Benz: In response to your letter dated July 8, 1988 concerning additional information regarding the DRI/ADA for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort, we have prepared information for your review. Requests for additional data as requested by the SWFWMD and the PSTA are also enclosed. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Eng!neeriry Planning 1. A copy of the Settlement Stipulations (Court Cases No. 83-14905-7 Sciences and 78-4765-7) is provided as Exhibit 1 of this enclosure. Landscape Architecture for the Coastal 2. The applicant has not yet formally applied Construction Line variance. Preliminary work required prior to application to the City is not complete but is expected in the immediate near future. The applicant has delayed submission of detailed construction permits pending approval of all planning applications. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 1. The project will not infringe on historic nesting areas. As discussed on Page 1-22 of the Sufficiency Response, construction of expansion facilities will not occur in typical sea turtle nesting areas. Sea turtles typically nest between the mean high water line and the sand dune line. Construction of the hotel facilities will occur landward of the proposed dunes. The creation of a defined dune system will actually enhance the beach for sea turtle nesting because a defined dune.system will shield light from the existing development and provide a base at which the turtles prefer to lay eggs. The dunes will not actually be an encroachment onto historic nesting areas and will encourage nesting activity. Representatives of the Clearwater Marine Science Center and FDNR were consulted on this as well as the following issues. (Personal Communication, Alan Huff, FDNP., 7-15, 18-88, Dennis Kellenberger CMSC 7-18-88). 201 E Kennedy Bouie,e Sur1e 334 • Tam Da Florida 3360, - Grp,. 613-221.^000 u:?-_: er 813-229-0974 Ms. Sheila Benz July 30, 1988 Page 2 2. The commitment to a sea turtle hatchery has been added to the list of commitments. The permanent hatchery will be a 1200 sq. ft. fenced in area with a locked gate. The top of the hatchery will be covered and plans will include a boardwalk around the hatchery. The hatchery will be used by the Clearwater Marine Science Center as an incubation and relocation point for eggs found in poor nesting areas. In the future the hatchery will be used for Kemp's ridley sea turtles as well as loggerhead sea turtles and will be of comparable dimensions to the temporary facility currently in place. 3. Attached is correspondence to the FDNR requesting documentation. A response is forthcoming. In the meantime, questions concerning the project as it relates to sea turtles may be directed to Mr. Alan Huff of the FDNR Bureau of Marine Research in St. Petersburg. 4. There is no discrepancy. The FDNR letter of December 17, 1987 from Jennifer Murtay (attached) requests no heavy beach cleaning equipment to be used during nesting season. Ms. Murtay suggests that beach cleaning equipment be limited to light rakes, excluded from a 10 foot radius around each nest. The commitments listed on page 1-5 and 2-11 of the S.R. are in concert with FDNR requests. 5. As discussed in previous documents, hotel lighting will not directly illuminate areas seaward of the dunes as it will be shielded by vegetation and sand. Hotel room lights will be minimized through the use of window tinting; shielding of patio lights; low watt exterior lights designed to shine downward on patio surfaces; tennis courts will be fenced and shielded with mylar draping; and walkway lighting will be minimized with shielding protection. WATER SUPPLY Landscape plantings will be irrigated at a rate of 1.5 in./wk. Based on 4.25 ac. of landscaped area, a non-potable water demand of 24,728 GPD is calculated. ENERGY Average daily and peak hour electric power demand estimates for the Residential Option for Tower 2, are provided along with the generation rates used. M .^-qa r.?' I\ri \':B?E Trim t ? ? Ms. Sheila Benz July 30, 1988 Page 3 PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE ENERGY PROJECTION AD F__7R9_ ADD MZ_ (KWH//U) (KW/U) (KWH) (KW Tower 2 Condominiums 267 units 44.4 3.5 11,855 935 EDUCATION The residential units anticipated for Tower 2 of the expansion are intended to be similar in price and occupancy characteristics of other condominiums on Sand Key. The occurrence of school age children is expected to be negligible due to the nature of the projected owner-type. However, an estimate for purposes of addressing Question 26, Education, has been prepared and a letter sent to the Pinellas County School Board requesting verification of the availability of classroom space. FIRE The ISO rating for the station serving the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort is 3 with a response time of 3-5 minutes. This number was provided through telephone conversations with Virginia Kosta of the City of Clearwater Fire Department on July 25, 1988. TRANSPORTATION [J r•? r.'' iki I 1. The applicant has stated their intent to make it mandatory that employees arriving from the south during the A.M. and P.M. peak periods use the hotel-furnished shuttle. The shuttle will operate during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. 2. Parlor car service for both A.M. and P.M. peak hours will be implemented by the applicant and made available to hotel patrons. 3. The applicant agrees to annual monitoring and inclusion of the monitoring program results in the annual report after the C.O. has been issued. It is felt that two years of monitoring is sufficient to demonstrate that ridership has been achieved. 4. Trip generation rates to condominium units are about 50% less than the rate for hotel units. Therefore the number of projected trips will be reduced and DRI thresholds (5% of capacity) will not be met if the condominium units are built. Ms. Sheila Benz July 30, 1988 Page 4 Letter from SWFWMD In response to the SWFWMD letter dated June 2, 1988, the requested information is as follows: Application rate = 1.5 in/wk. = 75 in/yr. Irrigable area = 4.25 acres Non-potable water demand = 24,728 GPD Letter from PSTA A provision will be made for PSTA buses to serve both facilities from a single bus stop location with pedestrian sidewalks and designated walkways accessing both properties from the bus shelter location. The responses provided in this letter should be sufficient for your review purposes. We respectively request that the City of Clearwater be notified to set the public hearing date. Than you for your time and attention to this correspondence. Should you have additional questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, WADE-TRIM, INC. William A. Ockunzzi Execu-ive Vice President WAO:ps SSK2:34 ZZZ2067.01 G?^tM I I Waoc-Tnm [=Q= ) Q??Slt 9 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EXPANSION OF THE SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT FOR GRANT) COULOIR CORPORATION PREPARED BY: Wade-Trim I Engineering Landscape Architecture 66 &;4 ®Plannin Environmental Sciences 201 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 Wade-Trim June 10, 1988 r."'i Vikio v ® ? Group Services ngineerino Planning Sciences Landscape ArcNtec:i-E Ms. Suzanne Cooper DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Subject: DRI #179 Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Ms. Cooper: On behalf of Grand Couloir Corporation, Wade-Trim is pleased to submit this Sufficiency Response (SR) for The Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Development of Regional Impact. Because of the fact that the stipulations in the recent court decisions allowing the construction of residential and hotel units appeared to be of concern, we have calculated the impacts that would be created if the second tower were built as a residential property. The results of this analysis are included in the response under Section 5 headed "Alternate Residential Use." A total of 32 copies have been delivered to all individuals listed on the attached Sufficiency Response transmittal list. If additional copies are required or any supplemental information is needed, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Dave Gildersleeve of our staff. Sincerely, W E-TRIM NC William A. ckunzzi Executive Vice Presi t WAO/ps SSK1:36 ZZZ2067-01 Attachment cc: T. Gene Prescott Gerald N. vonDohlen, Esq. Timothy Johnson, Esq. Bob Kay, Esq. Kevin Baker Russ Kimball Pat Al sup 20- w pnngo?, 5oule:a Sung ?3_ 'a ^?a ?a o?? ?j TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Subject Table of Contents i List of Exhibits Sufficiency Response Transmittal List ii iii Section 1 - Response to Requests for Additional Information - A. Background Information ?t 1-1 B. Environment and Natural Resources 1 -g 9 Question 13 - Air 1- Question 14 - Land 1-11 Question 25 - Water Quality 1-12 Question 17 - Floodplains 1-13 Question 18 - Vegetation and Wildlife E i 1-14 C. Economy r D. Public Facilities 1-17 Question 21 - Wastewater 1-18 Question 22 - Drainage 1-19 Question 23 - Water Supply 1-20 Question 24 - Solid Waste 1-21 ' Question 25 - Energy Question 27 - Recreation and Open Space 1-22 Question 29 - Police 1-23 1-24 Question 30 - Fire E. Transportation 1-25 Section 2 - Response to Additional Agency Comments A. Letter from City of Clearwater Letter from Southwest Florida Water Management District B 2-1 2-6 . C. Letter from Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2_90 D. Letter from United States Department of Agriculture 2-11 E. Letter from Florida Department of Natural Resources 2-12 F. Memorandum from Florida Department of Natural Resources 2-13 G. Letter from Division of Historic Resources Section 3 - Response to Preliminary Development Order Conditions A. General Conditions 3-1 3-2 B. Environment and Natural Resources 3-3 C. Public Facilities 3-4 D. Transportation Section 4 - Exhibits ` 4-1 i LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit # Subject Page 1A City of Clearwater Land Use 4-1 1B City of Clearwater Zoning Map 4-2 1C Letter from Paula Harvey 4-3 2 Revised Map G 4-4 4-5 3A-E Revised Maps A, C, D, F and I 4-10 4A Table 20-11 - Labeled 4-11 4B Overhead Costs - Detailed 4-12 4C 5A Table 20-2 - Labeled Letter from City of Clearwater - Sanitary Sewer 4-14 5B Letter from City of Clearwater - Sanitary Sewer 4-15 6A Letter from City of Clearwater - Potable Water 4-16 6B Letter from City of Clearwater - Potable Water 4-17 7A Letter from City of Clearwater - Solid Waste 4-18 7B Letter from City of Clearwater - Solid Waste 4-19 8A Letter from Florida Power Corporation 4-20 8B Letter from Florida Power Corporation 4-21 9 Letter from City of Clearwater 4-22 10 Letter from City of Clearwater - Police Department 4-23 11 Letter from City of Clearwater - Fire Department 4-24 12 State Roadways Map 4-25 13 Existing Sheraton Sand Key Resor t and the Proposed Expansion Map 4-26 Section 5 - Alternate Residential Use - Tower 2 5-1 SSK1:37 ii pv^vu P.' I?x ( 7 13h- E Waoe 1riT DRI SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE TRANSMITTAL LIST Ms. Suzanne T. Cooper, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 10 Copies SR St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 ' Mr. Richard Adair Florida Department of Transportation 4950 West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 500 1 Copy SR Tampa, Florida 33609 Ms. Terry Porter, DRI Coordinator Mr. Louis Fernandez Department of Environmental Regulation 7601 Highway 301 North 2 Copies SR Tampa, Florida 33610 Mr. George Percy, State Historic Pres. Officer. Chief, Bureau of Historic Preservation Division of Historic Resources Department of State, The Capitol Copy SR 1 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Mr. Mike Allen Office of Environmental Services Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission 620 South Meridian 1 Copy SR Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Mr. Clark Hull, Sr. Env. Scientist Resource Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street 5 Copies SR Brooksville, Florida 33512-9712 Mr. Bill Howell Bureau of Biological b Interpretive Services Department of Natural Resources 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Room 508 2 Copies SR Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Mr. Dennis Harmon, Chief Bureau of Economic Analysis Florida Department of Commerce 406 Fletcher Building 1 Copy SR Tallahassee, Florida 32399-8132 ?f ?? 111 ?f f Mr. Tom Beck, Chief Department of Community Affairs Division of Local Resource Management Rhyne Building 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Mr. A. J. Salem Planning Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 4970 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 Mr. Connor Davis Marine Fisheries Commission 2562 Executive Center Circle, E., Suite 211 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Mr. Gene Heath, General Manager West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority 2535 Landmark Drive, Suite 211 Clearwater, Florida 33519 Mr. William Saalman, III U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 5118 North 56th Street, Suite 250 Tampa, Florida 33610 Mr. Jim Muller Florida Natural Areas Inventory 254 East Sixth Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Mr. Wilbur Barnes Executive Director Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority 14840 49th Street North Clearwater, Florida 33520 Hr. Hugh Pascoe Pinellas Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization 440 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 Mr. Guy Daines Pinellas County Civil Emergency Services 315 Court Street Clearwter, Florida 34616 SSY,1:37 iv cv^Qe [ 7 ®d?fe 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR 1 Copy SR SECTION 1 RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION QUESTIONS 11 & 12 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND MAPS 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A LAND USE AND ZONING MAP OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ADJACENT PARCELS. Exhibits 1-A and 1-B reflect the current City of Clearwater land use and zoning designations. The project site is zoned "B" (Business) with a Land Use Plan Classification of Commercial/ Tourist Facilities, which reflect the terms of the Settlement Stipulations (Court Case No. 83-14905-7 and 78-4765-7). Further, as noted in Ms. Paula Harvey's letter dated January 26, 1988, "the allowable density is provided for in the stipulation, and although it exceeds that provided for under the terms of the Land Use Plan, the stipulation shall prevail" (See Exhibit 1-C). 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED COPY OF MAP G. MUCH OF THE PRINTING ON THE PRESENT COPY IS UNCLEAR AND SEVERAL AREAS DO NOT HAVE FLOW DIRECTION DELINEATED. A revised copy of Map G is enclosed as Exhibit 2 in the Exhibit section of this document. 3. MAPS, A, C, 0, F AND I INCORRECTLY SHOW THE SITE AS BEING LAND LOCKED RATHER THAN EXTENDING TO THE GULF OF MEXICO. REVISED MAPS WITH ACCURATE DISTANCE SCALES, SHOULD BE PROVIDED. Revised maps A, C, D, F and I are enclosed as Exhibits 3-A, 3-B, 3-C, 3-D and 3-E in the Exhibit section of this document. 4. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING SHERATON SAND KEY FACILITIES INCLUDING ANY INCREASE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE, NUMBER OF ROOMS OR CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, SUCH AS CONVERSION OF HOTEL ROOMS TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ETC. The proposed renovation of the existing Sheraton Sand Key will take place concurrent with the construction of the new hotel. Plans at this stage are preliminary. General upgrading of the public areas within the structure as well as in the guest rooms is planned. Conversion of various public areas (e.g. from restaurant to retail space or from lounge areas to meeting space) is probable. No net increase in square footage of these areas is planned. There will be no conversion from hotel rooms to residential units. 1-1 Cpr^E t' ?IdF r ? t ?e ? E ev_?a• i .r 5. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE STATEMENT ON PAGE 12-1 IN THE ADA THAT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION IS PLANNED FOR RELATE 1989 AND THE STATEMENT ON PAGE 12-2 IN THE ADA THAT THE EXPANSION IS TO BE DEVELOPED OVER A TEN-YEAR BUILD-OUT PERIOD. The completion of the first tower is scheduled for late 1989. Renovation of the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort facility will commence during construction of the first tower and is anticipated for completion concurrent with the first tower in 1989. Construction of the second tower will commence subsequent to 1989, and within the proposed 10 year buildout period. PLEASE GIVE A BREAKDOWN, PER ACRE AND SQUARE FOOT, OF LAND USE i AFTER BUILD-OUT. PLEASE GIVE A BREAKDOWN OF DEVELOPMENT PER PHASE OF FLUCCS CATEGORY 145, TOURIST SERVICE, CONSISTS OF AUXILIARY FACILITIES TO SUPPORT OVERNIGHT TOURIST/TRAVEL LODGING. FLUCCS ?l CATEGORY 140, COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES, INCLUDES COMMERCIAL RESORTS, AS SET FORTH IN "FLORIDA LAND USE COVER AND l CLASSIFICATION" HAND BOOK. ! As designated in Category 140 of the Flori.da Land Use Cover Classification System, "Commercial and Services" incorporates commercial resorts, as noted. The following is a breakdown by -i acreage and square footage of the completed project as proposed. LAND USE CATEGORY SQ. FT. ACRES TOTAL DEVELOPMENT (Expansion Site) ?K Structures 93,045 2.14 Pavement Pools 161,229 3.70 Pervious* 267,022 6.12 521,296 11.96 DEVELOPMENT SEAWARD OF CCCL (Expansion Site) Structures 22,779 .52 Pavement Pools 54,094 1.24 Pervious 187,152 4.30 246,025 6.06 DEVELOPMENT SEAWARD OF CCCL (Existing Site) Structures 4,090 .09 Pavement 75,305 1.72 Pervious 288,305 6.62 367,700 8.43 *Includes landscaping, plantings, dunes and beach 1W Source: Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates Wade-Trim, Inc. 1 1-2 rr^^ae c.'' 14i Vvaoe irim 6. HOW MANY STORIES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE NEW HOTEL TOWERS? The towers will not exceed 18 stories in height which includes 17 typical floors, with lobby meeting space and upper parking on the main level and a level of parking at grade level. 7. PLEASE SPECIFY ALL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS PROPOSED FOR CONSTRUCTION SEAWARD OF THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE (CCCL). Development proposed seaward of the existing Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) includes portions of the hotel tower, patio, pool and decking, spa, detention basin, and dune system with walkways. 8. WILL THE EXPANSION REQUIRE A LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE CHANGE(S) WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED. Neither a land use plan amendment nor a rezoning of the parcel will be required to accommodate future development. Proposed development is consistent with the existing land use plan and zoning atlas of the City of Clearwater. The designations reflect the terms of the Settlement Stipulations approved by the Court in Cases, Circuit Civil No. 78-4765-7 and 83-14905-7 which provide for hotel or residential use of the property. 9. WITH REGARD TO THIS PROPOSED PROJECT, PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF COMMITMENTS MADE IN THE ADA AND SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE, TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OR TO PERMITTING AGENCIES BY THE DEVELOPER. The following commitments have been excerpted from the Application for Development Approval (ADA) and Sufficiency Response (SR): ADA Commitments o The low-rise building areas designed around the towers will include a 50-75 seat lobby, 250 seat entertainment lounge, 250-30 seat cafe, 80-100 seat restaurant, retail space, health spa, day care center, indoor pool, ballroom/meeting rooms, administrative/ registration area, prefunction areas, rest room facilities and general lobby area (Page 12-1, ADA.) o The outside recreation facilities will include an outdoor pool, pool bar, terrace area, and other recreational amenities (Page 12-1, ADA). o The proposed renovation of the existing Sheraton Sand Key will take place concurrent with the construction of the new hotel (Page 1-1, SR). o There will be no conversion from hotel rooms to residential units (Page 1-1, SR). 1-3 11 P^IM L Mi.- E: 1 ?I ?I t r UP-RE C.' {larE [ ? 7 fer?6?. o Renovation of the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort facility will commence during construction of the first tower and is anticipated for completion concurrent with the first tower in 1989. Construction of the second tower will commence subsequent to 1989, and within the proposed 10 year buildout (Page 1-1, SR). o Initial development activity will include the construction of a 428 suite tower and associated amenities and the renovation of the existing hotel. Construction of the second tower, shall include 322 hotel units or 267 condominium units (Page 12-2, ADA). o The towers will not exceed 18 stories in height which includes 17 typical floors, plus one meeting level, one lobby and parking level below (Page 1-2, SR). o Development proposed seaward of the existing Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) includes portions of the hotel tower, patio, tennis courts, pool and decking, spa, detention basin, and dune system with walkways (Page 1-3, SR). o The beachfront will be the focus of a sea-oat vegetation program which will include a sand dune system and pedestrian walkway for beach access (Page 12-2, ADA). o The proposed project will not adversely affect beach configuration due to impacts of sand transfer along the dune line (Page 1-10, SR). o The proposed expansion will result in the construction of a uniform and contiguous vegetated dune line that will far exceed the size and quality of what now stands in what is referred to as the present "dune line" (Page 1-13, SR). o No significant clearing or grading of soils is proposed (Page 14-2, ADA). o Wind erosion control will be accomplished through watering of the soils and sodding, if necessary (Page 14-2, ADA). o To prevent soil erosion during and after construction hay bales and sediment traps will be implemented. The area surrounding new construction will be landscaped as soon as practical (Page 1-10, SR). o Soil erosion and sediment control measures identified in the ADA and sufficiency will be in place at the initiation of construction (Page 2-10, SP.). o All stormwater will be treated pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. (Page 15-1, ADA). o The first three-quarter inch of runoff will be treated by either filtration system, natural percolation or both as required by SWFWMD Chapter 40D-4 and Section 17-25 F.A.C. (Page 1-11, SR). 1-4 Wage-Trirr o All new impervious surface will comply with the stormwater management requirements of Chapter 40D-4 and 17-25, F.A.C. (Page 15-2, ADA). o To compensate for potential flood hazards, all FEMA and City of Clearwater engineering and construction specifications relevant to construction in the 100 year flood zone will be adhered to (Page 17-1, ADA). o All permanent habitable structures will be constructed above the designated base flood elevation (Page 17-1, ADA). o By virtue of the proposed project's footprint being partially seaward of the CCCL, the entire major habitable structure will be constructed in accordance with the design standards required by Chapter 161.053 F.S. and Chapter 16B-33 F.A.C. for construction seaward of the CCCL (Page 1-12, SR). o The hotel will follow all instructions established by the City of Clearwater (regarding hurricane evacuation Page 1-12, SR). o As proposed there will be approximately 300 feet of beach between the mean high water line and the nearest structure (Page 17-1, ADA). o In order to avoid potential adverse impacts to sea turtles the following measures will be incorporated into the Sheraton Sand Key expansion: - The Sheraton Sand Key will engage the Clearwater Marine Science Center or other qualified agencies or individuals to survey the beach as required and mark with FDNR approved warnir signs any sea turtle nests found on the Sheraton beach. This zztivity will begin May 1 and continue through the en. of nesting season, November 1. Mechanized beach cleaning will occur only after the daily nesting surveys. Cleaning equipment will avoid identified nests. Dunes will be created and vegetated on the existing Sheraton property as well as the expansion property. FDNR personnel will be consulted concerning dune construction. Two dune walkovers will be incorporated into the dune system. This measure will serve to create the natural dune system as well as conceal artificial lighting visible from the beach. - Dune walkover lighting will be footlights or appropriately shielded low frequency lighting. The site plan is being designed to minimize light visible to hatchlings. - Any construction requiring exterior lighting during the nesting season (M?-y 1 - November 1) will be limited to daylight hours. 1-5 - The Sheraton currently displays and will continue to display sea turtle education information . (Page 18-3, ADA). o The creation of the dune system will enhance the existing beach habitat as well as shield hatchlings from visible light and will extend around the southwestern edge of the property (Page 2-11, SR). o If heavy beach cleaning equipment is required during the nesting season, it will be limited to the mean high water line or below. Light rakes will be used above the mean high water line where turtle nests may be located. All beach cleaning equipment will be excluded from a 10 foot radius around each nest (Page 2-11, SR). o If in fact archaeological resources are found during project construction, the applicant agrees to report such findings to determine their significance with the Division of Archives and the City of Clearwater (Page 19-1, ADA). ' o The proposed Sheraton Sand Key expansion will enjoy some rsonnel from the existing facility efficiencies in using some pe (Page 1-15, SR). o Approximately 50% of the manufactured construction materials will SR) 3 2 . , - be obtained from outside the Tampa Bay region (Page o Phase I construction will contain 428 hotel units. Phase II ondominiums or 322 additional hotel 267 c development will contain units (Page 2-3, SR). o The detention area will be designed to contain the runoff from ost-development conditions while t for p 25-year, 24-hour storm even limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year event under existing conditions (Page 22-1, ADA). o The retention/detention pond will be designed to contain the runoff from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event for post-development ' conditions while limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year ith SWFWMD 40D-4 event under existing conditions in accordance w d the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Regulations an Criteria (Page 1-18, SR). o The bottom of the pond will be at +4.5 elevation with a maximum of 2' depth (Page 1-18, SR). o This pond will also be designed to treat the first 3/4 inch of ill be runoff from the respective tributary area. Treatment w provided by percolation (Page 22-1, ADA). o Detention areas will be incorporated into the dune system and be utflow and impound specified f o designed to control the rate o volumes of stormwater for treatment and storage to meet Chapter 40D-4 and 17-25 F.A.C. (Page 22-1, ADA). 1-6 o All inflow and outflow structures will be designed to prevent erosion, scour and washouts (Page 22-1, ADA). o The retained volumes of stormwater runoff will be treated within the detention area (Page 22-2, ADA). o This system will be designed with sufficient capacity to treat discharge and the required storage within a maximum retention time of 72 hours as set forth in Chapter 17-25 F.A.C. (Page 22-2, ADA). o All on-site systems, structures, and detention areas will be maintained by the Owner (Page 22-2, ADA). o The developer will meet all applicable design and safety measures required by the City of Clearwater (Page 1-18, SR). o Of the 11.96 acres, approximately 3. acres of recreational and open space are to be provided on site (Page 27-1, ADA). o Energy conservation features for the buildings will include: - High efficiency insulation in walls and roofs of the buildings, - twin glazing for insulation at windows if the calculations indicate that utilization of this feature will in fact, save energy for a specific building, - High efficiency central air-conditioning equipment, - heat recovered from air-conditioning chillers will be used for heating, and domestic hot water, - digital controls and a microprocessor will be part of a total energy management system to achieve efficient operation of all energy consuming environmental systems including control of the lighting and HVAC systems (Page 1-21, SR). o All areas designed for recreational activities will be open and available to hotel patrons and guests (Page 27-1, ADA). o The recreation facilities on-site will be maintained by the owners (Page 27-1, ADA). o All recreational facilities lying landward of the proposed dune system will be provided for the use of hotel guests and residents (Page 1-22, SR). o Existing and future accreted beach lying seaward of the proposed dune system will be available to both the general public, hotel guests and residents (Page 1-22, SR). 1-7 wI?^E-% ¦IL?X_ Wace in^ k 'K IE 1.-.dL i o In accordance with the City of Clearwater Building Code, sprinkler systems will be placed consistently throughout the establishment ] in conjunction with a fire alarm warning system (Page 30-1, ADA). o The developer will work with the City of Clearwater to ensure all ' fire and safety codes are met (Page 2-8, SR). i J o Fire protection systems for the entire project will be provided in accordance with the latest recommendations of NFPA and in conformance with the Standard Building Code and Standard Plumbing Code... (Page 2-8, SR). o The hotel will be equipped with a "life safety protection system i (LSPS) (Page 2-8, SR). o Fire extinguishers will be placed on every floor level and will ? provide for immediate response to fire emergency situations while fire protection service will be provided by the City of Clearwater Fire Department (Page 30-1, ADA). o Two new driveways will be constructed as part of the expansion to the hotel (Page 1-27, SR). o Details will be coordinated with PSTA when a final site plan has SR) e 1-29 xtension Pa i . , g ce e been approved (regarding bus serv 0 Design consideration will be made for the continued operation of commercial shuttle vehicles and the Clearwater Beach Trolley (Page 31-28, ADA). SS K1:38 1-8 6P-Kr r.- 16! WaOc- I nrr. ]k W. A B. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES QUESTION 13 - AIR 1. IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO SUBMIT AN AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS AFTER THE FINALIZATION OF TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND DURING SUFFICIENCY REVIEW. As noted in the Transportation Section of the ADA and this Sufficiency Response, the proposed development results in a negligible impact on area roadways. Because of this negligible impact, an Air Quality Impact Analysis is not deemed necessary by either the applicant or regional review agency. 2. WHERE IS THE CLOSEST AIR QUALITY MONITORING STATION IN RELATION TO THE SUBJECT SITE? The closest air monitoring station to the subject site is located at the Pinellas County Sheriffs Department, 250 West Ulmerton Road. This station monitors for total suspended particulates (TSP), carbon monoxide (CO), and lead (Pb). 3. WHEN AN APPLICANT PROPOSES TO UTILIZE THE PIPELINE OPTION FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION, AIR QUALITY MODELLING SHALL BE BASED UPON PARAMETERS CONSISTENT WITH THAT OPTION. AIR QUALITY MODELLING SHALL NOT BE BASED ON THE IMPROVED ROADWAY NETWORK SET FORTH IN RESPONSE TO QUESTION 31.F OF THE ADA, UNLESS FUNDING COMMITMENTS BY A RESPONSIBLE ENTITY ARE CONFIRMED. Please refer to Question 13-1 above. The applicant will not employ the Pipeline Option to mitigate transportation impacts. SSK1:39 1-9 ter-^Q? r E?a `L R`sId ?, aac- i rrr QUESTION 14 - LAND 1. WHAT HAS BEEN THE CAUSE OF THE LAND ACCRETION IN THE PROJECT AREA? IS THIS TREND LIKELY TO CONTINUE, CEASE OR POSSIBLY REVERSE ITSELF? The cause of accretion of the shoreline seaward of the project under consideration is due primarily to the stabilization of Clearwater Pass in 1975. The construction of the rock jetty along the northern end of Sand Key has resulted in the impoundment of substantial quantities of sand to the south of the Pass through the formation of an extremely large accretion fillet. The source of sand presently residing in the accretion fillet has been both natural and man-induced. Sand dredged from the Pass by the City was placed south of the jetty on the County Park property in 1975. Several dredge disposal operations at the same location have like- wise been constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Beginning in 1983, construction of a beach fill project along approximately 7,000 feet of shoreline was instigated. A substantial portion of that project fill has subsequently been impounded by the Clearwater Pass south jetty. The result of this process has been the rapid and continued seaward propagation of the shoreline seaward of the Sheraton project. As of 12/21/87 the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) was an average of 619 feet seaward of the CCCL on the Sheraton property. Accretion at this location is expected to continue to occur. Although the process could be expected to ultimately stabilize, there is no reason to believe that any significant MHWL recession will occur in the future. Both storm effects and future beach fill projects will tend to result in future accretion at the project site. 2. HOW WILL THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AFFECT BEACH CONFIGURATION IN TERMS OF SAND TRANSFER ALONG THE DUNE LINE? The proposed project will not adversely affect beach configuration due to impacts of sand transfer along the duneline. There is presently no defined duneline along the subject property. The project under consideration will result in the construction of a ` uniform and continuous vegetated dune formation. 3. WHAT SPECIFIC MEASURES WILL BE UTILIZED TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION? A-, To prevent soil erosion during and after construction hay bales and sediment traps will be implemented. The area surrounding new construction will be landscaped as soon as practical. SSK3:6 1-10 C. ` It Waou-Trim 17 x: If Ftis..d4 QUESTION 15 - WATER QUALITY 1. PLEASE DESCRIBE IN MORE DETAIL THE PLANS TO TREAT THE FIRST HALF INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE "RESPECTIVE TRIBUTARY AREA". The first three quarter inch of runoff will be treated by either filtration system, natural percolation or both as required by SWFWMD Chapter 40D-4 and Section 17-25 F.A.C. SSK3:7 1-11 wpm-QC C c" ` E N.. E kkb -?C QUESTION 17 - FLOODPLAINS 1. PLEASE CLARIFY THE TIMING OF THE APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA TRUCTION LOCATED DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL CONTROL L??E SEAWARD ' A CCCL application has been filed and is running concurrently with been held with the h ave the DRI process. Preconstruction meetings d Shores and DNR, pertaining to the permit Division of Beaches an bmittal requirements and the advance submittal of a 30-year su was latter Seasonal High Water Line Survey (SHWL)•h d ceptance an ac advance to the Agency on December 29, 1987 for its filing relative to the pending permit submittal. 2. PLEASE CLARIFY THE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS WHICH WILL BE PROTECT THE PROJECT FROM STORM INCORPORATED INTO PROJECT DESIGN TO WHAT SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN FEATURES WILL AND SCOURING . SURGE BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT WHICH EXCEED THE MINIMUM PERMITTABLE BY LAW OR RULE? ` By virtue of the proposed project's footprint being partially the entire major ntrol Line C i , o on seaward of the Coastal Construct ill be constructed in accordance with the habitable structure w design standards required by Chapter 161.053 F.S. and Chapter 16B-33 F.A.C. for construction seaward of the CCCL. These standards exceed local standards required for construction ` landward of the CCCL. CLEARWATER COPY OF TOEPINELLAS 3. PLEASE SEND TBRPC DPRTHE CITY OF OPOSAL , HURRICANE EVACUATION COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. The Sheraton does not have a documented hurricane evacuation l will follow all t h e o proposal. However, as in the past, the instructions established by the City of Clearwater. The following is a synopsis of procedures followed during past evacuations. After verification of the evacuation order by the Clearwater Police Department, all guests are instructed to leave the facilities by the Belleair Causeway and to seek hotel accommo- dations inland, or to go to designated Pinellas County shelters. For guests needing transportation to evacuate, school buses are provided under the direction of the Clearwater Police and Fire Departments. Employees evacuate following the same instructions. After the evacuation order is given the property is secured for the prevention of any damage. A member of the Sheraton executive team is in command at all times. SSK3:8 1-12 EP^!8; waoc-Trim QUESTION 18 - VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 1. PLEASE PROVIDE MAP F SHOWING VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS ON-SITE. Map F provided in the ADA is a combined Map D & F. The vegetation cover was classified as FLUCCS category 322, Coastal Scrub. This scrub category represents a conglomeration of species found in the coastal zone. This cover type is generally found in dune and white sand areas. Commonly found species in this category include sea purslane, sea grape, sea oats, bay bean, spanish bayonet and prickley pear. The land proposed for expansion is, for the most part, vacant land that exhibits several of the above varieties of plants in small quantities along with other varieties of grasses, weeds, and sandspurs. 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CREATE AND "REVEGETATE" THE DUNE SYSTEM. The present dune system referred to in the ADA is not signifi- cantly defined. It is a sparse remnant system that has been referred to in the original report for reference purposes. As reflected on Map H (revised) the proposed expansion will result in the construction of a uniform and contiguous vegetated duneline that will far exceed the size and quality of what now stands in what is referred to as the present "dune line." 3. THE TIME OF YEAR IN WHICH THE BIOLOGICAL SURVEY IS CONDUCTED IS CRITICAL IN DETECTING CERTAIN ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES. WHAT METHODS WERE USED AND ON WHAT DATES WERE SURVEYS CONDUCTED TO ENUMERATE THE FLORA AND FAUNA OF THE SITE? A qualitative pedestrian survey was conducted on November 6, 1987 with Mr. Alan Huff of FDNP,, Mr. Dennis Kellenberger of the Clearwater Marine Science Center, Mr. Jack Dronzek of Grand Couloir Corporation, Mr. Douglas Robison and Ms. Tammy Lyons of Wade-Trim, Inc. It was the consensus of the reviewing parties that no significant vegetation or habitat for species other than the loggerhead sea turtle was present on the site. 4. PLEASE PREPARE A MAP WHICH INDICATES THE PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT SITE WHICH HISTORICALLY MEET THE DEFINITION OF PRESERVATION AREAS, AS DEFINED IN THE COUNCIL'S ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY, FUTURE OF THE REGION, SECTIONS 10.1.2 AND 10.3.1. Council growth policies 10.1.2 and 10. preservation areas as coastal marshes, grass beds and significant sand dunes, hotel expansion will not encroach upon those systems. The remnant sand dunes turbed and not significant. Therefore SSK3:9 1-13 3.1 define conservation and mangrove forests, marine respectively. The proposed or otherwise impact any of existing on site are dis- no map is provided. EW^Qe r ," ILN Vvaoe- i riT It 6- r- i# cct GULF BOULEVARD Te$S e[RSV1[AT RuAlnla Sin) j fIlltTLLIS r.1A At I].as it nT1111Arn0012 ].Te At rttotwr 432 At IU,Ifr ff sT.ert sr 11.96 he Ilijw S, xmerraT atAllra er tm 1[vAa]oA uRl DR] SUBJECT PROPERTY :11MMIs t: c MA[AT/re0lf 22.77+ Sr S4,O14 Sr rterlas X a; -..= i 1St,r sr 9i 1."S"ST 0EVILOMW SSA iD v mS (SIIMK Sir[) Sn¢Tatf m Ac A.W IF rAlocer f.1r ac 1C.Im 6.61 At n.1es sr M.3e1 sr A.A) At x1,700 IF i' GULF OF MEXICO • IAtLVOtf LAIgL-.VIA[. 1W TIAt, 0U[f A!] A[Ko t-D 0. STW. A. A? UUKIATSs •U[-iI IA, IC. 0 50 100 150 200 PRELIMINARY SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT CONCEPTUAL MASTER Consultants: Wade-Trim DEVELOPMENT PLAN Edward D. Stone & Associate REVISED - APRIL 1988 Nathan, Evans, Pounders & Taylor C. ECONOMY QUESTION 20 - ECONOMY 1. IT IS UNCLEAR FROM TABLE 20-1 AS TO HOW THE CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT TOTAL (331) WAS DERIVED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES. The estimate of the number of construction employees to be utilized on the project was derived by projecting a construction time schedule for both phases, by trade, and imputing the number of employees for each trade by construction sequence. 2. THE TABLES THAT APPEAR ON PAGES 20-4 AND 20-5 ARE NOT NUMBERED. ALTHOUGH THE TABLE WHICH APPEARS ON THE TOP OF PAGE 20-4 DOES ILLUSTRATE L. PLEASE ANGES, THERE IS PROVIDE THIS O ININDICATION OF THE FORMATION AS REQUIRED BYED ANNUAL PAYROL THE ADA. The tables that appear as "Table 20-2, Estimated Annual Payroll - Normal and High Season Permanent Employees" and "Table 20-3, Estimated Annual Payroll - Construction Personnel" have been revised and are attached as Exhibit 4A, 4B and 4C. 3. THE "NORMAL SEASON" AND "HIGH SEASON" PERSONNEL FIGURES SHOWN IN PAGE 20-4 APPEARS TO INDICATE THAT THE NUMBER OF PERMANENT EMPLOYEES WILL VARY SEASONALLY, ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO NARRATIVE PROVIDED TO THIS EFFECT. PLEASE ADDRESS THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE THAT THE "NORMAL SEASON" WOULD REQUIRE 419 EMPLOYEES AND THE "HIGH SEASON" WOULD REQUIRE 549 EMPLOYEES. As the tourist trade throughout the State of Florida experiences an ebb and flow of visitors to the state, related facilities dependent on the tourist market also experience seasonality in their business volumes. Consequently, additional personnel are required to service the added client numbers throughout the winter months and are reduced through the typically slower The method used in forecasting the personnel figures for the Sheraton Sand Key expansion is based on 13 years experience of the present Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The high season will be February through April, while the balance of the months are "normal season". The fluctuation is usually due to the banquet department personnel that handle conventions and meetings. 1-14 P.' WX V?aoe- i nr. [ Ias..st? 4. THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS (ITE) TRIP GENERATION MANUAL INDICATES THAT A HOTEL WILL EMPLOY, ON AVERAGE, 0.90 EMPLOYEES PER ROOM. THE 419 TO 549 PERMANENT EMPLOYEES PROJECTED BY THE APPLICANT APPEARS TO BE TOO CONSERVATIVE. PLEASE JUSTIFY THE EMPLOYMENT FIGURE. The method used in forecasting the employment level is based on the present 390 rooms that the Sheraton Sand Key Resort has operated for the past 13 years. The past experience of employment level runs from 280 to 325 personnel or approximately 0.77 employee's per room. The proposed Sheraton Sand Key expansion will enjoy some efficiencies in using some personnel from the existing facility (i.e. desk, maintenance, kitchen personnel, etc.). 5. PLEASE ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE PERMANENT EMPLOYEES WILL BE FOUND WITHIN THE TAMPA BAY REGION. To clarify, it would be accurate to state that approximately 95% of the permanent employees will be found within the Tampa Bay region. 6. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE ABSORPTION RATE OF HOTEL ROOMS, PER ANNUM, IN THE SHERATON SAND KEY AREA. Current estimates of the absorption rates of hotel rooms in the Clearwater Beach area are 253 hotel rooms per annum. 7. PLEASE PROVIDE ESTIMATES OF ANY IMPACT FEES WHICH WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHERATON SAND KEY EXPANSION Impact Fee Estimate 1) Recreation (Ordinance 116.4 - per stipulation 51,137/R.D.U. or 5758.19/hotel unit 2) Transportation, - per County Ordinance $589.00 X 428 = 3) Water - depending on size of meter-5350-535,000 1-3" lawn = 1-4" dom.= 4) Sewer - 1) 5600/unit + $100 per additional bath (20 add'l) 5) Development - 1) 5250/unit 2) $250/2,500 SF of commercial area @60,000 S; 1-15 Phase I Phase II (428 Units) (322 Units) $324,127 252,092 S 16,100 189,658 5,250 1-2" 2,800 8,750 1-4" 8,750 259,000 107,000 6,000 193,200 80,500 1,000 RP^vr F.' IVN vvac)E- n C ) L IL KbL- _?L SHERATON SAND KEY EXPANSION Impact Fee Estimate (Continued) Phase I Phase II (428 Units) (322 Units) 6) Building Permits - - Swimming Pool & Spa (flat fees) 160 - C.O. - $25/unit 10,700 8,050 - Electrical - $20/unit 8,560 6,440 - Plumbing - $20/unit 8,560 6,440 - Mechanical - $20/unit 8,560 6,440 - Building Permit - $3,000 valuation plus $2/$1,000 for first $750,000 additional valuation 57,500 50,200 Total Impact Fees: $1,056,259 $569,578 SSK3:10 f 1-16 BP^t8 I I ) 6l??? D. PUBLIC FACILITIES QUESTION 21 - WASTEWATER PROVIDE THE LETTER OF COMMITMENT FROM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: A. THE PRESENT AND PROJECTED CAPACITY OF THE TREATMENT AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, B. ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, AND C. A STATEMENT OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. Please refer to Exhibit 5-A, for the original commitment letter from the City of Clearwater, and Exhibit 5-B for new commitment letter from the City of Clearwater with respect to the Residential Option for Tower 2. SSK3:11 1-17 F _\ IL N ace- I ri7' f QUESTION 22 - DRAINAGE 1. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES WILL THE DETENTION POND BE FILLED TO THREE FEET OF DEPTH? WHAT SAFETY MEASURES WILL BE EMPLOYED TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO THE AREA, DUE TO ITS PROXIMITY TO THE BEACH? The retention/detention pond will be designed to contain the runoff from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event for post-development conditions while limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year event under existing conditions in accordance with SWFWMD 40D-4 Regulations and City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria. Therefore, the pond will be at +4.5 elevation with a maximum of 2' depth. The developer will meet all applicable design and safety measures required by the City of Clearwater. 2. HOW WILL THE DETENTION AREA BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DUNE SYSTEM? HOW WILL THE OUTFLOW STRUCTURE BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT EROSION, SCOUR AND WASHOUTS? The dune system is part of the detention pond's perimeter. Solid sod will be utilized to prevent erosion. Decorative riprap will be installed if required. SSK3:12 1-18 Bpr-411r. C14Waae-Trim C 7 Pir.?.QE: QUESTION 23 - WATER SUPPLY PLEASE PROVIDE THE LETTER OF COMMITMENT, FROM AGENCY OR FIRM, PROVIDING WATER SERVICE, OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, (3) A STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY OR FIRM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. Please refer to Exhibit 6-A, for the original commitment letter from the City of Clearwater, and Exhibit 6-B for new commitment letter from the City of Clearwater with respect to the Residential Option for Tower 2. SSK3:13 1-19 WPF^44P V Lt' c ? ? ??_ee QUESTION 24 - SOLID WASTE ` PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING SOLID WASTE SERVICE, OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED OF DEVELOPMENT THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, (3) A STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY OR FIRM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. Please refer to Exhibit 7-A, for the original commitment letter j from the City of Clearwater, and Exhibit 7-B for new commitment 1 letter from the City of Clearwater with respect to the Residential Option for Tower 2. SSK3:14 1-20 Q?^a? QUESTION 25 - ENERGY 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE FIRMS PROVIDING ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS SERVICE TO THE PROJECT, OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE GAS SUPPLIER AND OF THE ELECTRICAL GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR EXCESS CAPACITIES, (3) A STATEMENT OF THE SUPPLIERS' ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. Please refer to Exhibits 8-A and 9-A regarding commitments from Florida Power Corporation and Clearwater Utilities Department regarding electrical and gas service to the proposed development. Further, Exhibit 8-B reflects appropriate commitments with respect to the Residential Option for Tower 2. 2. PLEASE DISCUSS THE ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN METHODS AND EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL BE UTILIZED IN THE PROJECT. Energy conservation features for the buildings will include: o High efficiency insulation in walls and roofs of the buildings, o twin glazing for insulation at windows if the calculations indicate that utilization of this feature will in fact, save energy for a specific building, o high efficiency central air-conditioning equipment, o heat recovered from air-conditioning chillers will be used for heating, and domestic hot water, o digital controls and a microprocessor will be part of a total energy management system to achieve efficient operation of all energy consuming environmental systems including control of the lighting and HVAC system. SSK3:15 1-21 Wpp^Vr- c C i J 1; k. ,cL V aoe- rim i i r r QUESTION 27 - RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHICH RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, INCLUDING THOSE DESIGNATED FOR PASSIVE RECREATION, WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. All recreational facilities lying landward of the proposed dune system will be provided for the use of hotel guests and residents. Existing and future accreted beach lying seaward of the proposed dune system will be available to both the general public, hotel guests and residents. 2. WILL ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING BEACH DUNES INFRINGE ON CURRENT OR HISTORIC LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLE NESTING AREAS? Sand Key beach has historically been and is currently known to have nesting loggerhead sea turtles. However, construction of the project will not occur in the most probable loggerhead nesting areas. If present, the sea turtles generally nest between the mean high water line and sand dunes. Construction of hotel facilities will occur landward of the proposed dunes. Eventually the minor encroachment will be mitigated by the continued accretion of new beach. Creation of a dune system is intended to mitigate possible impacts to the sea turtles. The turtles frequently nest near the base of the dune. The creation of the dune system will enhance the existing beach habitat as well as shield hatchlings from visible light and will extend around the southwestern edge of the property. SSK3:lb 1-22 QF^E? t I C t ` f. n?c.?eC V?'zoe-7nrr, QUESTION 29 - POLICE PLEASE PROVIDE EXHIBIT 29-1, REFERENCED ON PAGE 29-1 OF THE ADA. The letter from the City of Clearwater Police is attached as Exhibit 10 in Section 4 of this report. SSK3:17 1-23 Er^E t Q'. f QUESTION 30 - FIRE 1. WHAT IS THE ISO RATING FOR THIS SITE? The ISO rating for the present Sheraton Sand Key is .044 for the buiding and .201 for the contents. It is anticipated the expansion will be the same or better. 2. WHAT WATER PRESSURE WILL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE FLOWS (PLEASE INCLUDE HIGH-RISE ASSESSMENT)? Based upon assessment with officials of the water department of the City of Clearwater, water pressure will be provided at 55/p.s.i. for the proposed facility. Booster pumps will be provided as required by the City. The proposed multi-story facility is not atypical of existing development on Sand Key. ?I 3. PROVIDE A STATEMENT FROM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ADDRESSING THE CAPABILITY TO EVACUATE THE STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED AND AVAILABLE, RESPONSE TIME AND BACKUP CAPABILITY IN THE EVENT OF A MAJOR FIRE. Please refer to Exhibit 11, letter from the City of Clearwater' provided in the DRI/ADA. SSK3:18 1-24 6r^MRL MILK Waoe-Trim ?4_ec E. TRANSPORTATION QUESTION 31 - TRANSPORTATION TBRPC COMMENTS 1. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE APPROPRIATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES ATTESTING TO THE EXTENT AND SCHEDULING OF IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED IN THE ADA IN QUESTION 31-A. The only planned improvement identified in the study is the widening of Gulf Boulevard in two locations. A letter from Pinellas County attesting to these improvements was included as Exhibit 31-4 of the original ADA. 2. IT IS STATED IN QUESTION 12 THAT AN EQUIVALENT NUMBER OF RESIDEN- TIAL UNITS, IN TERMS OF TRIP GENERATION, MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR 322 HOTEL SUITES. PAGE 31-15 SAYS "BECAUSE THE PROJECT IS A HOTEL, IT HAS A DISTRIBUTION OF TRIPS THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE STANDARD DRI PROJECT." HOW THEN CAN A SUBSTITUTION OF THE ONE LAND USE FOR ANOTHER BE BASED SIMPLY ON TRIP GENERATION RATES? As noted earlier in this Sufficiency Response, the Settlement Stipulation , Circuit Civil No. 78-4765-7 provides the option of constructing either hotel or residential uses on the property. As outlined in the ADA, the development of Towers 1 and 2 as hotel suites generates the following peak hour trips: o 750 Hotel rooms X 0.80 trips/room = 600 trips The peak hour trip generation for towers 1 and 2 as hotel and condominiums is as follows: o 428 Hotel rooms X 0.80 trips/room = 342 o 267 Condos X 0.51 trips/condo = 136 878 trips The attached tables illustrate the roadway link (i.e. Gulf Boulevard from Walsingham to 4th Avenue) impacted by the proposed development and assumes the same trip distribution for condomin- iums and hotel rooms. This distribution is deemed appropriate given the limited alternatives for distribution of project traffic in an easterly direction (i.e. via Belleair Causeway and Walsingham Road). It is anticipated that the distribution of shopping or work trips which could be associated with the con- struction of Tower 2 as residential condominiums will not be sig- nificantly different than those associated with a hotel use. Additionally, the actual number of peak hour trips would be reduced as a result of the development of Tower 2 as residential condominiums. Exhibit 31-6 illustrates the 1997 Project Trip Distribution at Gulf Boulevard and 4th Avenue. 1-25 BA^1qF_ C ? . Wao&-7 nn', > Q } J w ¢ N Z 201 z 2 r' a 121 MARIANNE 153 60 CAUSEWAY BLVD. 81 -?? 105 0 2 4 0 1 t 61 221 p 6 Lu U ? cG = 'F TL ?` t ps PROJECT s SITE J 225 129 4 171 'l 75 D J 156 ? Co i 69 J 1 I L 135 21 I L. t7 114 21 1 30 ! E. ?4 28 65 t11 SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT Wade-Trim F410 - Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Env;ronmcntal Sciences -POI r 0 z J MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY 01 BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY WALSINGHAM RD. N rc 0 to COURT ST. LEGEND 4th AVE. 0100010? DIRECTIONAL PEAK, HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS EXHIBIT 1997 PROJECT TRIP el. DISTRIBUTION Table 1 - PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION - HOTEL ROOMS 8actgrwnd 1 ?ro- Typical 9401round Traffic Project Traffic F8 4 RY E -I F I Jett Traffic ?-59-]x- 8act9rouumdd W rroject T Tlr- b LOS Contributed Indicated ro+c.cnt t I. P j AoaNly Section t ] B U 7 N8/E CAPACITY Y/C L /L L p y ro ec Gulf 81+d. 141t1nghaw to 4th 2LU 105 Ill TO 111 73S 887 710 1.09 E 1.25 E 1T.8 JLU 4th to Part 2LU 70S 777 It 28 716 801 710 1.09 E 1.13 E 4.4 --- Table 2 - PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION HOTEL ROOMS & CONDOS 84dgr-d i Pro- Typical NcF9round Traffic Pro ect Traffic lect in ffic M ct round 84 ct rand t ?roet T LOS 0 Contributed Indicated ROR&a7 Section F3iL8?67r-' Fd718-38/GS ne/EB-T97ui!- C!rACITT P rF ? by Project fro,ment Golf 81•d. Maltingh- to 4th 21- U 70S 177 26 82 771 855 710 1.09 E 1.20 f 12.8 FLU SS[2:23 The origin-destination survey conducted by Wade-Trim in preparing on m 00-6:00 4 . p. : ADA submittal was conducted between the original September 22, 24 and 28, 1987 and yielded the following results: o Of the 42 motorists that were leaving the Sheraton Sand Key and traveling south, 16 responded that they were traveling to destinations south of Walsingham Road. Twelve of the res- were going to Indian Rocks Beach or d the t y e pondents sta Crabby Bills Restaurant. Only four were traveling to sites below Indian Rocks Beach. o Of the 80 motorists that were entering the Sheraton Sand Key from origins south of the site, eight stated they were arriving from locations south of Walsingham Road. Five of the respondents stated they were coming from Indian Rocks Beach. The distribution included in the ADA showed that 114 project vehicles traveled south of Walsingham Road and did not track these vehicles beyond the intersection of Gulf Boulevard and Walsingham Road. The attached revised 1997 Project Trip Distribution extends the study area to the south in order to better display project traffic. From this distribution, based on the origin-destination study, Tables 1 & 2 were prepared. These tables display for the additional links the same information that Table 2A of the ADA displayed. Based on this more detailed analysis, the only roadway link that the project impacts will be Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham Road and 4th Avenue. MITIGATION TECHNIQUES In order to reduce the number of trips generated by the facility on both a daily and a peak hour basis, the Sheraton Sank Key will enact several new policies and programs. These policies and their impact on traffic are discussed below. o Employee Shuttle In order to reduce the number of employee trips from the project, the hotel will operate a shuttle between the Indian Rocks Beach area and the hotel. This shuttle will operate on a regular basis to carry employees between the hotel and their cars. Data collection by the hotel determined that almost 13 percent of the hotel staff complete their work and leave the hotel between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m. Since work shifts are set by the hotel, this is a percentage that can be maintained by hotel management. Using the same distribution of traffic presented in the ADA, there will be 43 southbound employee trips on Gulf Boulevard between 1-26 ?r^vR F.' l6F Wade-7, rr I L 't ?tltrS?` Walsingham and 4th Avenue during the P.M. peak hour at project build-out. These 43 employee trips will be removed from the roadway network and replaced with two trips of the shuttle for a reduction of 41 trips on the roadway link. o Parlor Car Service for Guests The Sheraton Sand Key proposes to operate a regularly scheduled shuttle (parlor car) service between the hotel and desired guest destinations to the south during P.M. peak and evening hours. The fixed travel route will be southward since the Clearwater Trolley takes guests from the hotel to Clearwater Beach. The shuttle vehicle will be a custom designed luxury vehicle. Schedules will be established to meet the needs of guests, making this an attractive and convenient alternative to driving. From the analysis in the ADA, it was estimated that there would be 83 total southbound trips to Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham and 4th Avenue during the P.M. peak hour. Since 43 of these trips will be employees, as was previously calculated, there will be 40 trips by guests. From a survey of guests conducted by the Sheraton Sand Key during March, 1988, it was found that approximately 85 percent of the guests would use the shuttle vehicle to reach their destinations. Replacing 85 percent of the vehicle trips with two shuttle trips would reduce the project traffic on the Gulf Boulevard link by an additional 34 vehicle trips. o Other Mitigation Techniques In order to reduce building costs and reduce traffic to the Sheraton Sand Key, the hotel proposes to relocate its laundry and bakery to the mainland. This will eliminate both employee and service vehicle trips that are related to these services. This trip reduction will not be strongly related to a peak: hour, but will serve to reduce the total trips generated by the facility throughout the day. It is anticipated that the relocation of support services will result in the reduction of employee trips and service vehicle trips. 3. IT IS REQUESTED THAT PROPOSALS FOR PIPELINING SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE DETERMINATION OF SUFFICIENCY. FAIR-SHARE CALCULA- TIONS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS' RULE AND REGIONAL POLICY, WITH REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STAFF PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The applicant will not employ the Pipeline Option to mitigate transportation impacts. 1-27 F. fk't v;aoe-I!!, c V. ; 15 f.- F_ 4. THE TRAFFIC INFORMATION PROVIDED ANALYZES THE EFFECTS OF PROJECT TRAFFIC RESULTING FROM THIS DRI AT TWO EXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO THE SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT. THE ANALYSIS PROVIDED REVIEWS THE NEW TRAFFIC VOLUMES BUT IGNORES THE EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES THAT WILL ! RESULT FROM THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AT THE SHERATON RESORT. PLEASE REVIEW THE ANALYSIS TO INCLUDE AS BACKGROUND TRAFFIC THE OTHER TRAFFIC COMING FROM EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AT THE SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT TURNING IN AND OUT OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH SHERATON DRIVES ONTO GULF BOULEVARD. Two new driveways will be constructed as part of the expansion to the hotel. Details will be worked out with the City of Clearwater regarding pedestrian and service vehicle access between the existing and expansion properties. The analyses provided in the ADA examined the operation of those driveways. It is not anticipated that a large number of vehicles from the existing facility will use the new driveways, nor was an analysis of the existing driveways deemed necessary since they are not of regional significance. ` 5. THE TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ALIGNMENT IDENTIFIED FOR THE GULFVIEW BOULEVARD AT CORONADO STREET INTERSECTION APPEAR QUESTIONABLE. THIS INTERSECTION IS A T-TYPE INTERSECTION WITH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD RUNNING EAST/NEST AND CORONADO STREET RUNNING NORTH FROM THE i INTERSECTION. TRAFFIC VOLUMES IN EXHIBIT 31-2 AND EXHIBIT 31-7 APPEAR QUESTIONABLE. PLEASE VERIFY THE GEOMETRY OF THIS INTER- SECTION AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND REVISE ANY ANALYSIS AS NEEDED. [ The geometry of the intersection is correct as shown in the ADA. The traffic volumes included in the ADA are based on a turning movement count conducted by the City of Clearwater on October 24, 1985. The count was seasonally adjusted and increased by an annual growth factor to obtain 1987 volumes. 6. THE DIRECTIONAL PEAK HOUR LINK CAPACITIES AS INDICATED IN THE ROADWAY LINK ANALYSIS ON TABLE 31-2A ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR CAPACITY AS INDICATED IN TABLE 14 PROVIDED AS THE LAST PAGE OF THE DRI/ADA WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE FOR DETERMIN- ING LINK CAPACITIES ON A GENERALIZED BASIS OR THE NEW HOURLY AND PEAK DIRECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLES DEVELOPED BY THE BUREAU OF MULTIMODEL SYSTEMS PLANNING, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 1987, COULD BE USED FOR GENERALIZED LINK ANALYSIS. IN LIEU OF THESE A MORE DETAILED LINK ANALYSIS COULD BE PROVIDED. PLEASE REVISE THE ANALYSIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN ACCEPTABLE PROCEDURE. The attached table lists the source for each of the capacities * used in the ADA. As agreed upon at the Traffic Methodology meeting, the capacities are based on either the UTPS capacity table or the FDOT Generalized Daily Capacity table. For the Daily capacity tables, the listed capacity was multiplied by 0.05 (assuming a K of .1 and a D of 0.5) to determine a peak hour capacity. This study was done prior to the distribution of the new FDOT tables. 1-28 IL waoe-Trim I ? ? ROADWAY CAPACITIES DIRECTIONAL ROADWAY Memorial Causeway Drew to Island Way Island Way to Marianne Causeway Boulevard Mandalay to Memorial Marianne Street Memorial Csy. to Poinsettia Poinsettia to Mandalay Mandalay Avenue Memorial Csy. to Papaya Causeway Blvd. to Gulfview Gulfview Boulevard Coronado to Hamden Hamden to Clearwater Pass Gulf Boulevard Sheraton to Clearwater Pass Sheraton to 3elleair Csy. Belleair Csy. to Walsingham Walsingham to Park Boulevard Walsingham to 4th Avenue Belleair Causeway Gulf Blvd. to Harbor View Walsingham Road Gulf Blvd. to Hamlin TYPICAL PEAK HOUR SOURCE OF SECTION LINK CAPACITY CAPACITY 4LD 2500 FDOT TABLE 4LD 2500 FDOT TABLE 3L ONE-WAY 2070 UTPS TABLE 4L ONE-WAY 2840 UTPS TABLE 4L ONE-WAY 2840 UTPS TABLE 4LU 1360 UTPS TABLE 4LU 1360 UTPS TABLE 3LU 990 FDOT TABLE 3LU 990 FDOT TABLE 3LU 990 FOOT TABLE 3LU 990 FDOT TABLE 3LU 990 FDOT TABLE 2LU 710 UTPS TABLE 2LU 710 UTPS TABLE 2LU 1230 FDOT TABLE 4LU 1360 UTPS TABLE NOTE: PEAK HOUR CAPACITIES FOR CAUSEWAYS, 2 LANE DIVIDED COLLECTORS AND ARTERIALS TAKEN AS .05 OF FDOT DAILY CAPACITIES FOR SIMILAR FACILITY TYPE. SSK3:26 1-29 6tv^orl r .?' IIL?F wane-lnr. C C \ 3 LR'.'L Insi.sLt 1 7. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LENGTH IN MILES OF ALL ROADWAY LINKS INCLUDED IN TABLES 31-1, 31-2A, 31-2B AND 31-2C. The length of each roadway link is shown on the attached table. ?• SSK3:19 1 J 1-30 mop-K 6 r I" Ik N Vvade i rim I:ir_ar RCe'?'L ROADWAY SECTION LENGTHS ROADWAY Memorial Causeway Drew to Island Way Island Way to Marianne Causeway Boulevard Mandalay to Memorial Marianne Street Memorial Csy. to Poinsettia Poinsettia to Mandalay Mandalay Avenue Memorial Csy. to Papaya Causeway Blvd. to Gulfview Gulfview Boulevard Coronado to Hamden Hamden to Clearwater Pass Gulf Boulevard Sheraton to Clearwater Pass Sheraton to Belleair Csy. Belleair Csy. to Walsingham Walsingham to Park Boulevard Walsingham to 4th Avenue Belleair Causeway Gulf Blvd. to Harbor View Walsingham Road Gulf Blvd. to Hamlin SSK3: 27 TYPICAL LENGTH SECTION (XX.X MILES) 4LD 0.80 4LD 0.40 3L ONE-WAY 0.20 4L ONE-WAY 0.20 4L ONE-WAY 0.06 4LU 0.30 4LU 0.05 KU 0.63 KU 0.50 3LU 0.20 KU 2.80 3LU 2.40 2L U 2.80 2LU 0.07 2LU 1.30 4LU 0.50 1-31 19P_% F r ?? s %1 aje-1n^r FDOT, PINELLAS COUNTY MPO AND PSTA COMMENTS IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 699 (REFERENCE #WPI7117007) HAVE NOT BEEN 1 1 . PROGRAMMED; THEY ARE MERELY UNDER CONSIDERATION. NO CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED FOR THIS PROJECT IN THE FDOT FIVE-YEAR WORK PROGRAM. A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE PROJECT BY FDOT IS NEEDED. PLEASE UPDATE YOUR ANALYSIS AS NECESSARY. Programmed improvements to Gulf Boulevard (SR 699) are part of the adopted Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP-Oct. 1987). Construction as 2 lane divided facilities are programmed for Gulf Boulevard, from Indian Rocks to Clearwater Pass (WI#1014), and from 5th Avenue to 28th Avenue (WI#1065). 2. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE ALL STATE ROADS IN THE TEXT AND ON ALL GRAPHICS. Exhibit 31-1 from the ADA has been revised to indicate all State roadways and is included in this document as Exhibit 12 in Section E 4. ROGRAM ON PAGE 31-8 OF THE ADA, THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS P 3 . (TIP) IS INCORRECTLY DATED 1988/89 THROUGH 1993/94. IT SHOULD B DATED 1987/88 THROUGH 1992/93. This correction has been noted. SR 60 IS NOT A SIX-LANE FACILITY FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE 4 . SECTION INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS. DOES YOUR ANALYSIS INCORPORATE THE ABOVE CONDITION? The only segment of SR. 60 included in the analysis is the Memorial Causeway, Marianne Street and Causeway Boulevard. As noted in Tables 31-2A, 2B and 2C of the ADA, none of these roadways was analyzed as a six-lane facility. 5. IF THE APPLICANT HAS INTENTIONS OF RELOCATING OR ESTABLISHING NEW TURN-AROUND AREAS, PLEASE CONTACT PSTA TO WORK OUT THE DETAILS. The applicant has no intention of changing an existing turn-around area. As part of the expansion, it is anticipated that bus service to the site may be expanded to include service to the new section of the facilities. Details will be coordinated with PSTA when a final site plan has been developed. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT, PURSUANT TO COUNCIL POLICY 19.8.10, F.R. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE ADA, EVEN THOUGH IT IS INCOMPLETE, INDICATES THAT THE FOLLOWING LIST OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, AT MINIMUM, WILL REQUIRE IMPROVEMENTS IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THIS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTAIN A SATISFACTORY LEVEL OF SERVICE AND THEREFORE SHALL BE CONDITIONS OF PROJECT APPROVAL OR REASONS FOR DENIAL. 1-32 r lLX Wa0E-Tnrc: C 7 RF^,4u- Fi k- ? MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY/SR 60 GULF BOULEVARD CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY GULFVIEW BOULEVARD WALSINGHAM ROAD/ULMERTON ROAD The analysis does not indicate that the above listed roadways will require improvements in order to accommodate this development and maintain a satisfactory level of service. Table 31-2A indicates that only on Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham Road and 4th Avenue does project traffic exceed five percent of capacity and the road- way operates at LOS E. SSK3:19 1-33 ,1R"!F 'I,N V,a0e- LR'. ' f Lk -C 1 1 i, ?i 11 0...14F. } PINELLAS COUNTY MPO COMMENTS PLEASE ADVISE THE CONSULTANT TO CORRECT THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING ROADWAYS: 31.(1)A. - EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS STATE ROAD 60 IS CURRENTLY A FOUR-LANE UNDIVIDED FACILITY FROM MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD TO HARBOR DRIVE. IT THEN BECOMES A FOUR-LANE DIVIDED FACILITY BETWEEN HARBOR DRIVE AND U.S. HIGHWAY 19. EAST PAY DRIVE BETWEEN CLEARWATER-LARGO ROAD AND MISSOURI AVENUE IS A FOUR-LANE UNDIVIDED FACILITY. These comments are noted. They have no impact on the analysis. SSK3:19 1-34 Vvaoe-Tarr. SECTION 2 RESPONSE TO ADDITIONAL.., B AGENCY COMMENTS I' i 1 RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM: MS. PAULA HARVEY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY OF CLEARWATER DATED DECEMBER 18, 1987 The following responses are provided consistent with format of Ms. Harvey's letter to Ms. Suzanne Cooper dated December 18, 1987: 1. THERE ARE TWO (2) MAP "C's". THIS SHOULD BE CORRECTED. The maps which appeared in the ADA have been revised and renumbered as Map C-1 and C-2 and enclosed as Exhibit 3-B and 3-C. 2. THE FLOOD PLAIN MAP C IS DEFICIENT IN THAT THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE IS NOT ACCURATELY REFLECTED. THE PROJECT SITE RUNS TO THE WATER AND IN FACT IS PARTIALLY IN THE V-ZONE AS PER PAGE 17-1. Map C has been revised to reflect the project site extending to the water line. Please refer to Exhibit 3-C. 3. THE LAND USE AND VEGETATION MAP SHOULD PROPERLY LOCATE THE EXISTING DUNE SYSTEM, PARTICULARLY FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. PAGE 17-1 REFERS TO THE NATURAL DUNE SYSTEM BEING RECREATED. MAP D AND F SHOULD REFLECT ITS PRESENT LOCATION. The present dune system referred to in the ADA is not signifi- cantly defined. It is a sparse remnant system that has been referred to in the original report for reference purposes. The proposed expansion will result in the construction of a uniform and contiguous vegetated dune line that will far exceed the site and quality of what now stands in what is referenced as the present "dune line." See response to Question 14.2. 4. MAP H REFLECTS A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL RESERVE THE RIGHT OF FINAL REVIEW OF THE DETAILS OF THE SITE PLAN DURING THE COURSE OF PREPARATION OF AND APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ISSUES WHICH WILL BE FURTHER DISCUSSED INCLUDE NUMBER OF DRIVEWAY CUTS ONTO THE PROPERTY, FINAL LOCATION OF DUNE SYSTEM, CONSTRUCTION SEAWARD OF THE CCCL AND TRANSFER OF DENSITY TO ACCOMMODATE THE LEVEL OF EXPANSION. THE CITY WILL WORK ON A CONTINUING BASIS WITH THE DEVELOPER TO RESOLVE THESE ISSUES IN A TIMELY MANNER. Noted. F.F-Rtu r 0h. REGARDING MAP H AS PRESENTED IN THE ADA, A SCALE OF THE DRAWING WOULD BE HELPFUL TO DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. IN ADDITION, THERE IS NO DRAWING TO SHOW THE RELATION- SHIP OF THE EXPANSION AREA TO THE EXISTING SHERATON HOTEL FACILITY. 2-1 'Race-Trim, I THIS MUST BE PROVIDED. WE WOULD ALSO SUGGEST THAT THE CONFIGURATION OF DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH BE SHOWN, PARTICULARLY IN CONSIDERATION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SEAWARD OF THE CCCL WHICH IS PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT BUT DOESN'T EXIST ELSEWHERE ON THE ISLAND. Please refer to "Revised Map H" which illustrates the relationship , of the proposed site development to the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort Facility. 5. THE FIRE STATION LOCATED IN DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER IS IMPROPERLY LOCATED ON MAP I. The location of the downtown Clearwater Fire Station has been relocated on Revised Map I, Exhibit 3-E. 6. PAGE 14-2, THE APPLICATION SHOULD PROVIDE THE PRESENT BEARING CAPACITIES OF THE SOILS. Williams & Associates, Geotechnical Engineers of Clearwater, performed subsurface explorations at the site of this proposed project. Soil test borings drilled throughout the property encountered clean fine sands, clayey fine sands to sandy clays and the underlying limestone formation. This report detailed the subsurface conditions and evaluations based on data collected are discussed at length. In summary, the consultant has concluded that the upper sands are capable of providing adequate bearing capacity for the heavy column loads associated with the high rise structure. However, it was recommended that deep foundation systems be used due to a potential for post construction settle- ment of the underlying looser zones. The parking garage, in contrast, will support a shallow foundation due to the nature of the structure itself. A soil bearing pressure of 3000 pounds per square foot was used in evaluating this project and type of structures involved. 7. WE BELIEVE THE STATEMENT, "AS PROPOSED ;HERE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 550 FT. OF BEACH BETWEEN THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE AND THE NEAREST STr-U= TURE," IS INACCURATE. "BEACH" IMPLIES IT IS OPEN WHEN IN FACT THE SWIMMING POOL AREA AND DETENTION AREA ARE PROPOSED WITHIN THE 550 FT. DISTANCE. Approximately 300 feet of beach lie between the mean high water line and the nearest structure. 8. WE ARE UNCLEAR AS TO HOW THE NATURAL DUNE SYSTEM IS TO BE "RECRE;,TED" WHEN IN FACT IT IS BEING TORN DOWN AND REBUILT ELSEWHERE. OF GREATEST CONCERN IS THE STABILITY OF THE NEW DUNE SYSTEM AND ITS IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES SINCE OTHER EXISTING DUNE SYSTEMS MAY NOT BE WITHIN THE SAME ALIGNMENT OF THOSE CREATED BY NATURE AT THIS POINT IN TIME. FURTHER DISCUSSION OF THIS ISSUE WILL BE NECESSARY. There s no natural dune syste.^ on the subject property, nor on adjacent properties due to the nature of recent accreted landform. 2-2 r¦^q%F e i x ct.-A' WL.- L 11 It is likewise important to note that substantial dune formations are not typical of Sand Key in general due to its relatively low elevation. The proposed project will result in a low continuous vegetated dune formation seaward of the upland development with appropriate pedestrian management constraints such as walkovers, sand fences, and signage. 9. PAGE 20-2, CLARIFICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED OF THE 90% IMPACT TO THE REGION FOR MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION. ARE ALL MATERIALS PURCHASED IN THE REGION ACTUALLY MANUFACTURED IN THE REGION? THIS THOUGHT MAY ACTUALLY RESULT IN A LOWER PERCENTAGE IMPACT TO THE REGION. The impact to the region through materials purchased for construction has been revised to reflect a new total and is illustrated in Exhibit 4-A. Approximately 50% of the manufactured construction materials will be obtained from outside the Tampa Bay region. The revised dollar amount is approximated at $28,563,000, of which $14,100,000 will be spent locally. 10. PAGE 20-2 - WHAT IS INCLUDED IN OVERHEAD? IT IS ALMOST 50% OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST. PLEASE DEFINE. F Revised Table 20-1 (Exhibit 4-A) shows a revised overhead d t i e s expec estimated of $27,190,000 of which $17,705,000 (or 65%) I to directly impact the Tampa Bay Region. Project overhead is detailed in Exhibit 4-B. 11. PAGE 20-8 INDICATES THERE WILL BE 354 NEW PEAK HOUR TRIPS. PAGE 31-15 INDICATES A DIFFERENT AMOUNT. PLEASE CLARIFY. As indicated on page 31-15, the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Ivey is projected to generate 600 peak hour trips. It is anticipated that 354 of those trips will use the Clearwater Pass bridge as discussed on page 20-8. The project trip distribution is discussed on page 31-16 of the ADA. 12. PAGE 27-1. THIS SECTION SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ORDINANCES AND FEES TO THE CITY TO FULLY REPORT THE HOTEL'S CONTRIBUTION IN THIS REGARD. 1 Phase I construction will contain 428 hotel units. Per the Stipulation Agreement for the subject site, the stipulated impact fee is $324,126.93. 2) Phase II development will contain 267 condominiums or 322 additional hotel units. (750-428 from Phase I). These units are transferred R.D.U. density from the adjoining property to the north. Construction design and the timetable for this 2-3 ' r iv \R? C _\ I?.@ aoe-Trim t !'. IG?a..6?! second phase are indefinite at this time. Based on discus- sions with the City of Clearwater Planning Departmen'_ the City's Recreation & Open Space Ordinance, Section 116.40 of the Clearwater Code will determine the impact fees for these additional units. If developed as residential condominiums, the Recreation and Open Space impact calculates as follows: 267 X $200/R.D.U. = $53,400 If developed as hotel units, the Recreation and Open Space impact calculates to one-fourth the R.D.U. impact (4 hotel units = 1 R.D.U.) times 322 hotel units, as follows: 322 X $200/4 = $16,100 13. EXHIBIT 31-2, WHY IS THERE A 40% INCREASE IN TRAFFIC COUNTS GOING WESTWARD FROM ISLAND WAY TO POINSETTIA ON MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY. WE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE THE INCREASED TRAFFIC CAME FROM SINCE THERE ARE NO INTERSECTIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS TO ADD TO THE TRAFFIC. The difference in traffic volumes is likely due to the different sources of the counts. The count at Poinsettia was conducted by the City of Clearwater on November 6, 1985. The count at Island Way was conducted by Wade-Trim on October 1, 1987. Differences in the day of count, weather or several other factors could lead to the variance in volumes. 14. TABLE 31-1, MANDALAY AVENUE FROM CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD TO PAPAYA IS FOUR (4) LANE UNDIVIDED, NOT TWO (2) LANE UNDIVIDED. This change has been noted. As a result of this revision, the level of service on this link is LOS B, not LOS E as stated in the ADA. Similar results occur on Table 31-2A, 2B and 2C. 15. EXHIBIT 31-3. WE ARE NOT CONVINCED THAT THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AT CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD AND CORONADO IS "A" OR THAT LOS AT GULFVIEW AND CORONADO IS "B". HOW WAS THIS LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINED? The level of service was determined using the Critical Movement Analysis computer software. This software analyzes traffic volumes, lane geometrics, signal phasing and various other factors to determine a level of service. It must be noted that this was an analysis of weekday P.M. peak hour conditions, the time of largest impact of project traffic. It is not necessarily the time of maximum volumes on the roadway network of a beach, where the peak periods are on weekends and where they fluctuate daily depending on weather conditions. 16. EXHIBIT 31-5, REFER TO COMMENT #13 ABOVE. ALSO, ARE THESE NUMBERS FOR A PEAK PERIOD? PLEASE LABEL EXHIBIT. A copy o Exhibit 31-5 from the ADA is attached as Exhibit 13. The P.M. peak hour volume discrepancy discussed in response to Comment 13 is repeated here. 2-4 ctrr^vc: E. I??r Waoe-Tarr: ?d?L? 11. PAGE 31-27, STATEMENT IS PROVIDED THAT PUBLIC TRANSIT IS NOT HEAVILY USED AT THE HOTEL. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING FROM HOTEL OFFICIALS THAT THIS IS NOT THE CASE, PUBLIC TRANSIT IS USED. PLEASE CLARIFY. Public transportation is used heavily by Sheraton Sand Key Resort guests and is a very important part of the guest experience. Approximately 22% of the 1987 guests were international who use the buses for shopping trips to Clearwater Beach and the malls. Only a small percentage of the convention guests rent cars. Con- versely, most convention guests come by The Limo. When going to restaurants and quick shopping on the beach these guests use the trolley during its hours of operation. Also, taxi service is used in the off hours by convention guests. The public transportation question is vitally important to meeting planners and tour operators to the extent that the resort provides a picture in its sales brochures and. video presentations of the hotel featuring this mode of transportation. At this time PSTA and the City of Clearwater trolley service enter the Sheraton Sand Key Resorts' north driveway; stop under the portico area on the east end of the building; and leave from the south driveway. It is expected that the same area will be used in the future. SSK3:20 2-5 @P^EF kNaoe-Trim. C 7 i C01,: ?i?r?c RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM: H. CLARK HULL, JR. SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST RESOURCE REGULATION DEPARTMENT SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DATE DECEMBER 11, 1987 The following responses are provided consistent with the format of Mr. Hull's letter to Ms. Suzanne Cooper dated December 11, 1987: MAPS PLEASE PROVIDE COPIES OF MAP H IN A LARGER SCALE. THOSE SUBMITTED WITH THE ADA CONTAIN PRINTING THAT IS NOT LEGIBLE TO THE REVIEWER UNFAMILIAR WITH THE PROJECT. Please refer to Revised Map H which more clearly reflects the location of proposed buildings, parking areas, landscaped areas, recreation areas and dune system as well as written land use descriptions. QUESTION 15: WATER (C) GIVEN THE HIGH PERMEABILITY OF THE SUBSTRATA AND THE OUTSTANDING FLORIDA WATERWAY DESIGNATION OF THE SURROUNDING WATER BODIES, CAN THE APPLICANT SUBSTANTIATE THE STATEMENT THAT "THERE WILL BE NO IMPACTS TO WATER QUALITY", PARTICULARLY FROM PERCOLATED STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINED FROM PARKING AREAS? A GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE VICINITY OF THE DETENTION AREA. Natural percolation is the most reliable measure for removing of pollutants from stormwater runoff. In addition, the pond will be designed to treat "first 3/4 inch" instead of 1/2 inch and oil skimmer will be provided at inlet and/or outfall control structure. QUESTION 15: WATER (P. 15-1) THE APPLICANT STATES THAT "ALL STORMWATER WILL BE TREATED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 40D-4, F.A.C." THE APPLICANT SHOULD NOTE THAT SPECIFIC CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT ARE CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 17-25, F.A.C., REGULATION OF STORMWATER DISCHARGE. THE LATTER RULE IS ADMINISTERED BY THE DISTRICT CONCURRENTLY WITH CHAPTER 40D-4 PERMITS. A stormwater management plan will be designed in accordance with SWFWMD Chapter 40D-4 permits. 2-5 1611 ^vF ILX vi a a e T, BQ?RE I . 1 11 QUESTION 21: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT (D) THE LETTER TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT l REQUESTING INDICATION OF ABILITY OF THE CITY TO PROVIDE WASTEWATER SERVICE FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT WAS MAILED OUT 3 DAYS BEFORE THE ADA WAS SUBMITTED, THEREFORE, THE NEEDED RESPONSE WAS NOT INCLUDED. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LETTER OF RESPONSE AS PART OF THE 1 SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE DOCUMENT YOU WILL NEXT BE DEVELOPING. Please see Exhibit 5, commitment letter from the City of Clearwater. QUESTION 22: DRAINAGE THE APPLICATION STATES A DRAINAGE POND ON-SITE WILL BE DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE RESPECTIVE TRIBUTARY AREA. l SINCE ALL PINELLAS COUNTY SURFACE WATERS ARE DESIGNATED OUTSTANDING THE DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CITED AT SECTION ' FLORIDA WATERS , F.A.C. SHALL APPLY WHEREBY "STORMWATER DISCHARGE FACILITIES 17-25(9) , WHICH DIRECTLY DISCHARGE TO OUTSTANDING FLORIDA WATERS SHALL INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL LEVEL OF TREATMENT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF.THE TREATMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED IN SECTION 17-25.035(1)(B) OR SECTION " PROPOSED 040 OR SECTION 17-25.042, F.A.C." THE "FIRST 1/2 INCH 17-25 . ' MAY HAVE TO INCREASE TO "FIRST 3/4 INCH." ACCORDINGLY, TABLE 22-1 MAY REQUIRE REVISION. The retention/detention facility will be designed to treat the "first ) 3/4 inch" runoff, if required. Revised Table 22-1 i Basin Area Impervious Detention Storage Water Quality Required me Volume l t V Design Volume u o (AC. Area AC. Volume Ac.-Ft. Treatmen c.-Ft.(Ac.-Ft.) ( c.-Ft.) I 12.00 5.84 0.94 0.37 1.31 1.40 i QUESTION 23: WATER SUPPLY i (A., A.(1)) PLEASE QUANTIFY NONPOTABLE PROJECT DEMAND AS REQUESTED IN THE ADA. No nonpotable water demand is anticipated for this project. (B.) PLEASE SPECIFY SOURCE OF NONPOTABLE WATER SUPPLY FOR THE PROJECT. ' Not applicable. 2-7 Waoe-Trtrr ics?e[ (C.) ARE THERE ANY EXISTING WELLS ON SITE? ARE ANY WELLS PLANNED FOR NONPOTABLE SUPPLY, AIR CONDITIONING HEAT PUMPS, ETC.? IF SO, PLEASE FULLY ANSWER QUESTION C. OF THE ORIGINAL ADA. There are no existing wells on site. No wells are anticipated for nonpotable water supply. (E.)THE LETTER TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REQUESTING INDICATION OF ABILITY OF THE CITY TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER SERVICES FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT WAS MAILED OUT 3 DAYS BEFORE THE ADA WAS SUBMITTED, THEREFORE THE NEEDED RESPONSE WAS NOT INCLUDED. PLEASE SUBMIT THE LETTER OF RESPONSE AS PART OF THE SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE DOCUMENT YOU WILL NEXT BE DEVELOPING. Please refer to Exhibits 6-A and C-B commitment letters from the City of Clearwater. (F).PLEASE ANSWER QUESTION F. OF THE ORIGINAL ADA. Fire flow requirements for specific buildings have not yet been determined; however, the developer will work with the City of Clearwater to ensure all fire and safety codes are met. Fire protection systems for the entire project will be provided in accordance with the latest recommendations of NFPA and in conformance with the Standard Building Code and Standard Plumbing Code, including all City/County ordinances, and the requirements of utility and governmental agencies exercising jurisdiction over work at the project. In addition to these basic provisions, the hotel will be equipped with a "life safety protection system" (LSPS). The following component systems are included in the LSPS category: o Smoke detection alarm system o Fire alarm and fire communication system o Fire standpipe, sprinkler and sprinkler alarm systems o Smoke control and smoke venting systems o Emergency power systems o Fire control center o Zoned public address system, interconnected with fire alarm system. SSK3:21 2_-8 r ILE E.'' I? VJa??e-1 0 p. _in ,I RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM: MR. HUBERT L. PASCOE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR PINELLAS COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ' DATED DECEMBER 16, 1987 The requested corrections to Section 31.(1)A have been made to reflect State Road 60 as a four-lane undivided facility from McMullen-Booth Road to Harbor Drive. It becomes a four-lane divided facility between Harbor Drive and U.S. Highway 19. Additionally, East Bay.Drive between Clearwater-Largo Road and Missouri Avenue has been corrected to reflect a four-lane undivided facility. SSK3:22 1 2-9 6r^Rr_ ' C.' It It Viadc 7rirn G ; N6_?w RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM: WILLIAM SAALMAN, III DISTRICT CONSERVATIONIST U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DATED DECEMBER 10, 1981 Soil erosion and sediment control measures identified in the ADA and sufficiency will be in place at the initiation of construction. SSK3:23 2-10 RPP-4gv1 L r". L r,? _,eG RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM: MS. JENNIFER D. MCMURTRAY REGIONAL BIOLOGIST FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF RECREATION AND PARKS DATED DECEMBER 17, 1987 The project site plan has been designed with the intent to minimize light visible to the loggerhead sea turtles. Facilities such as the swimming pool, and parking lot have been located with the loggerhead hatchlings in mind. Hotel lighting will not directly illuminate areas seaward of the dunes. Indirect lighting which may be visible from the beach will be shielded by landscaping and the created sand dunes. Security or floodlights will be limited to the fewest number necessary. These will also be shielded by the aforementioned barriers. As stated in the ADA dune walkover lighting will be foot-lights or appropriately shielded, and there will be no evening construction during the nesting season which requires beach lighting. The project landscape architect has been furnished with a copy of the publication Sea Turtle Hatchling Disorientation and Artificial Beachfront Lighting by Paul Raymond, and instructed to incorporate those guidelines wherever possible. Therefore, it appears potential light reaching the beach will be eliminated. If heavy beach cleaning equipment is required during the nesting season, it will be limited to the mean high water line or below. Light rakes will be used above the mean high water line where turtle nests may be located. All beach cleaning equipment will be excluded from a 10 foot radius around each nest. As stated in the ADA, a qualified agency or individual will be engaged to survey the beach as required during the nesting season. Identified nests will be staked, or marked by a means to be determined by the contractor, and posted with approved FDNR signs. In addition to the measures listed above, the Sheraton has committed to incorporating a permanent 1200 square foot sea turtle hatchery as part of their new beachscape in an effort to further aid in the protection of loggerhead sea turtles. The applicant has worked closely with representatives of FDNR's Bureau of Marine Research and the Clearwater Marine Science Center in devel- oping procedures to adequately protect loggerhead sea turtles. It is believed that the measures identified in the ADA as well as those listed above will mitigate potential impacts and adequately protect loggerhad sea turtles at the proposed project site. SSK3:24 2-11 ' W?^rr, E- .' IL`C VJ2oe-Tnm [ } L F'. ` f IS??EF4 RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM: MR. CARLOS R. CARRERO ENGINEER BUREAU OF COASTAL ENGINEERING AND REGULATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DATED DECEMBER 16, 1987 It is understood that all construction will be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 161.053 F.S. and Chapter 16B-33 F.A.C. f. Existing vegetation on site consists of disturbed coastal strand uplands. Establishment of a vegetated dune system along with appropriate landscaping will mitigate for the removal of the existing vegetation and disturbed remnants of a secondary dune system. 5) MAP G, MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, IS SUGGESTED TO BE MODIFIED TO: A) ELIMINATE THE PROPOSED SPILLWAY ON RETENTION BASIN WHICH DISCHARGES ONTO THE OPEN BEACH. B) STAFF SUGGESTS STORMWATERS BE FORCE PUMPED OR DIVERTED TO STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM, OR RELOCATION OF THE RETENTION POND TO A FAR LANDWARD LOCATION. AS PROPOSED, THE RETENTION POND IS CONSIDERED VULNERABLE AND OTHER OPTIONS FOR A LANDWARD SITING SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. C) PAGE 15-2, WATER QUALITY - RUNOFF WATERS MAY CONTAIN GASOLINE, OIL, AND ASPHALT PARTICULATES TO BE DISCHARGED ON THE ACTIVE BEACH AREA THROUGH THE RETENTION POND. OF COURSE, THIS IS A MATTER FOR DER. This drainage design concept has been approved by the City of Clearwater including the retention/detention pond location. Runoff waters will be treated through natural percolation and filtration system or both. The oil skimmer will be provided at inlet and/or outfall control structure. A Certified copy of the City of Clearwater Land Development Code were mailed to Mr. Carrero simultaneously with the submittal of this Sufficiency Resonse. SSK3:25 2-12 F =\ I0. ? RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM; MR. GEORGE W. PERCY, DIRECTOR DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES AND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DATED NOVEMBER 19, 1987 This letter confirms a letter held by the applicant that no significant archaeological and/or historical sites are recorded for, or considered likely to be present within, the project area. E 1 'I t i SSK3:28 1+ 1 ' I I 2-13 iS P"\ IR C s SECTION 3 RESPONSE TO -PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS I I I SECTION III PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS A. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT, AS A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION, SHOULD 1 DEVELOPMENT SIGNIFICANTLY DEPART FROM THE PARAMETERS SET FORTH IN THE ADA, SUCH AS THE PROPOSAL TO SUBSTITUTE RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR a HOTEL ROOMS, MENTIONED IN THE ADA, WILL BE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 380.06(19), F.S. This condition is not acceptable. The terms of the Settlement i Stipulation, Circuit Civil No. 78-4765-7 provide for hotel or residential use of the property. This Sufficiency Response clearly illustrates that any increase in demands for public facilities (i.e. sewer, potable water, solid waste, electric, gas, police, fire, etc.) which may be associated with the construction of residential condominiums totalling 267 units in Tower 2, are I within the City's ability to serve the development. Further, the ' construction of Tower 2 as residential condominium as illustrated herein, will result in reduced impacts on the regional roadway system. 2. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT, AS A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION, THE COMMITMENTS MADE IN THE ADA BE REQUIRED UNLESS SUPERCEDED BY OTHER SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. This condition is acceptable. B. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AIR 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUGITIVE DUST ABATEMENT PROCEDURES INDICATED ON PAGE 13-1 OF THE ADA AS WELL AS APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE RESULTS OF THE AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT COMMITTED TO BY THE APPLICANT UPON COMPLETION OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, BE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION. ' Implementation of the fugitive dust abatement procedures is an acceptable condition. Because the traffic analysis revealed no need for an air quality assessment no other conditions are proposed. LAN D ' 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT THE SOIL CONSERVATION MEASURES REFERENCED ON PAGE 14-2 OF THE ADA BE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION. ' This condition is acceptable. 3-1 cP^QPw I r.' q\v VJaae 1nm ? .. } it6.-.dL 2. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT THE UTILIZATION OF ANY METHODS DISCUSSED TO OVERCOME PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PARTICULAR SOIL TYPES IN THE ADA BE DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. This condition is acceptable. WETLANDS 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT, AS A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION, MASTER PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR AREAS OF THE PROJECT SITE WHICH MEET THE CONSERVATION PRESERVATION DEFINITIONS AS SET FORTH IN POLICIES 10.1.2 AND 10.3.1 OF THE COUNCIL'S ADOPTED FUTURE OF THE REGION BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGNATION. No portion of the proposed project site currently meets the definition of conservation/preservation areas as established in sections 10.1.2 and 10.3.1 of Future of the Region. Therefore, this condition is not applicable. FLOODPLAINS 1. IN ORDER TO MITIGATE POTENTIAL PROPERTY DAMAGE FROM FLOODING, IT IS AN APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION THAT ALL ELEVATIONS FOR HABITABLE STRUCTURES BE AT OR ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION. This condition is acceptable. 2. UPON ISSUANCE OF A HURRICANE EVACUATION ORDER, THE DEVELOPER WILL TAKE ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO ENSURE THE SAFE EVACUATION OF ALL HOTEL VISITORS AND ANY REMAINING EMPLOYEES AT THE SITE. This condition is acceptable. 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL MAKE ALL EFFORTS TO COORDINATE WITH AND INFORM THE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES OF BUILDING CLOSINGS, SECURITY AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, AND EVACUATION PLANS. This condition is acceptable. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 1. THE LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLE PROTECTION MEASURES LISTED ON PAGE 18-3 OF THE ADA, AS WELL AS ANY IDENTIFIED BY FDNR AT MINIMUM SHALL BE DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. Sea turtle protection measures listed on page 18-3 of the ADA as well as those outlined in the response to FDNR's letter dated December 17, 1987 will be adhered to. 3-2 i V;2d6 ir:M 'i t' 2. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY SPECIES LISTED IN SECTIONS 39-27.003-.005, F.A.C. ARE OBSERVED FREQUENTING THE SITE FOR NESTING, FEEDING, OR BREEDING, PROPER MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE EMPLOYED IN COOPERATION WITH THE FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. This condition is acceptable. x 'r a HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE, AS A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION, THAT SHOULD ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL RESOURCES BE LOCATED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ULTIMATE DISPOSITION OF SUCH RESOURCES WOULD BE DETERMINED IN COOPERATION WITH THE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. This condition is acceptable. C. PUBLIC FACILITIES WASTEWATER 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT ASSURANCE OF ADEQUATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY AVAILABILITY BE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ESTABLISH A PLAN AND SCHEDULE WHEREBY ' SHERATON SAND KEY SEWER LINES SHALL BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND RUPTURES. THE PLAN SHALL DESIGNATE THE ENTITY(IES) TO CARRY OUT THE MONITORING AND SHALL INCLUDE A TIME SCHEDULE WHICH OUTLINES DATES AND FREQUENCY OF THE MONITORING PROGRAM. FAULTY LINES SHALL BE REPLACED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE (F.R. 13.8.2). This condition is not acceptable. The City of Clearwater employs an ongoing maintenance program to check sewer lines for leaks. This program includes the Sand Key area. It is not necessary for the applicant to also monitor the system. DRAINAGE 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN FOR REVIEW BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TBRPC BE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION. This condition is acceptable. r .\ 161 2. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION REQUIRE THAT THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE RETENTION, OR DETENTION WITH FILTRATION/ASSIMILATION TREATMENT FOR THE FIRST ONE-INCH OF RUNOFF GENERATED FROM THE SITE DURING THE 25-YEAR, 24-HOUR DESIGN STORM; AND THAT MAXIMUM POST-DEVELOPMENT FLOWS NOT EXCEED PRE- DEVELOPMENT FLOWS FOR THE SAME DESIGN STORM. This condition is not acceptable. However, SWFWMD is requiring that the first three quarter inch be treated. 3-3 Waae- i rim WATER SUPPLY 1. IT IS AN APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT CONDITION THAT ASSURANCE OF AN ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY CAPACITY AND OF MAINTENANCE OF THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE BE PROVIDED. 2. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT A COMMITMENT TO CONSTRUCT AND UTILIZE WATER SAVING FIXTURES THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT BE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION. These conditions are acceptable. ENERGY 1. IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT ASSURANCE BE PROVIDED OF ADEQUATE ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT, BE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION. 2. THE SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION SHALL BE ENCOURAGED TO INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES: REDUCE LEVELS OF OPERATION OF ALL AIR CONDITIONERS, HEATING AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS DURING NON-BUSINESS HOURS, ELIMINATION OF ADVERTISING REQUIRING LIGHTING AFTER BUSINESS HOURS, THE USE OF ENERGY-EFFICIENT PACKAGING AND/OR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS, - PARTICIPATION IN RECYCLING PROGRAMS, - THE INSTALLATION OF TOTAL ENERGY SYSTEMS WHERE COST EFFECTIVE, AND - THE USE OF COGENERATION TO RECOVER WASTE HEAT AND REDUCE PEAK DEMAND ON THE UTILITY SYSTEM. A REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AND PARTICIPATION IN THESE AND ANY OTHER ENERGY PROGRAMS SHALL BE REQUIRED IN EACH ANNUAL REPORT (F.R. 12.5.3 - 12.5.7). These conditions are not acceptable. Business hours for the resort facility cover a 24 hr. period. It is necessary that illumination of advertising follow the same procedures as the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort facility. Please refer to the response to Question 25 of this Sufficiency Response, which outline the energy efficient design methods and equipment which will be utilized in the project. 3-4 L i %'. mb.- t RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT THE ENTITY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 1 . MAINTENANCE OF ALL RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE AREAS BE IDENTIFIED IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. At the present time, the Sheraton Sand Key Resort employs two (2) lawn workers in the winter and three (3) workers in the summer (i.e. June-September) to maintain the outside grounds. It is anticipated that the number of outside maintenance personnel in this department will increase as a result of the proposed rsee this activity. d t o ove expansion including a department hea ' THE SEA OAT REVEGETATION AND SAND DUNE SYSTEM PROGRAM SHALL.BE 2 . REQUIRED AND MONITORING RESPONSIBILITIES SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. ' This condition is acceptable. ETATION . 3. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PRIMARILY NATIVE COASTAL VEG Native coastal vegetation will be utilized on the seaward side of etation may be native ve g the proposed sand dune system. Some non- utilized in the landscaped area fronting on Gulf Boulevard, around the pool and deck areas, and primarily on the seaward side of the ' c habitable structures. 4. LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION/OPEN SPACE AREAS (AND THEIR CONSTRUCTION) SHALL NOT DISTURB OR INFRINGE UPON CURRENT OR HISTORICAL LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLE NESTING AREAS. As stated previously loggerhead sea turtles have been known to ' nest at various locations along Sand Key beach. Areas altered by the proposed project are landward of traditional loggerhead nesting areas and will not significantly affect nesting habits. ' The minor encroachment will be mitigated by enhancement of the remaining and most probable nesting area through establishment of a dune system. ' POLICE 1. ASSURANCE OF ADEQUATE POLICE PROTECTION SHALL BE REQUIRED AND THE ' DEGREE OF DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPANSION OF SERVICES SHALL BE SET FORTH IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. The assurance that adequate police protection as a Development Order condition is acceptable. FIRE IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT, AS A DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION, THE 1 . DEVELOPER PROVIDE ASSURANCE OF ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION FOR THE ' PROJECT. The assurance that adequate fire protection as a Development Order 3-5 EP^Er- E Ei. t Waac- i nm i6:-Idm condition is acceptable. 2. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AT THE SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE FIRE CODE OR THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REGULATIONS, WHICHEVER ARE MORE STRINGENT. This condition is acceptable. 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ASSURANCE OF ADEQUATE FIRE FLOW WATER PRESSURE AND A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS, SPRINKLERS AND FIRE ALARMS. This condition is acceptable. 4. THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMPLEMENT ANY SPECIAL MEASURES REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT IN REGARD TO PROTECTION OF THE HIGH-RISE TOWERS AND DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION IN ANY REQUIRED EXPANSION OF SERVICES (SPECIAL EQUIPMENT, ETC.) SHALL BE SET FORTH IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. Based upon correspondence from the City of Clearwater it is not anticipated that any "special measures" will be required by the City of Clearwater Fire Department. Exhibit 11 illustrates the City's ability to service the project without expansion of services (special equipment, etc.). SSK3: 29 3-6 ap^ev P I1.C V,aoe- in^ C - Z Gili. ` L+ IM -19k ?l ?l SECTION 4 EXHIBITS LEGEND ® i 0000 RECREATION/OPEN SITE 00 COIi MERCLAL/TOURIST FAQUTIES ooo? ??' N, ? 0000000 ? ?? o00 000do H)GH Q TY RE8302fRAL °O o° o *boo , 0p oQ 0000 Opp ® LW-MLM OEN91TY RESWEI IAL 4 °o°00 a O eo°0 4 s°Opo x 00 r o0oo0ooeo 0' -1 Pub mm-rc ; 0000 000 0' 00 000 o0 ?Oo 00 0000 op TIDAL SWAMPS AND FLATS °O oo ° 0 0 Q^ BEACH DUNES SITE CIO / Oxl.?: L. p saw= / N 9 BIT SHERATON SAND KEY EXISTING fXHI_A Wade-Trim LAND USE EngAneorN?g Landscape /?rc?+icooar. REVISED - APRIL 1986 Planning Eavkonwontal icloooos Lrm - 1111111111111k C- s i 1 f r 1t I i - , r r -C R 28 AL/C SITE AL/C • f B f 0 S Dq??,C ? I I J y Q7 R o32P .? c0 C I 4 W U O 2 n / C tc 3 y W o / O I 4! I I RM W ?? 3 /I Q ° h m >'N l J W28 ?r ??'0= V x O °° A L/C F ,V - O b 3 Z q / = J O U ID ° 0 J i ¢ I U O W z ? I o W ULD ?•.o1 Of W W Y A L/C S, A J1. R ?M 16 Source: , City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas SHERATON SAND KEY EXHIBIT ?-?;?? Way-Tft . EXISTING ZONING Enow#"ring Land wALpe Archtteotttt REVISED - APRI _ 1988 FIsm"q Ewvkoerw?ntal ieNwo?• 4-2 ,trEp?o,; - ? - A l C I T Y OF C L E A R WA T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 -TER CLEARWATER,FLORIDA 33518-4748 PLANNING b URBAN DEVELOPKENT JAS' ''r 1909 January 26, 1988 W'AD_E- i RiIvl Mr. David B. Gildersleeve Project Manager Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 RE: Sheraton Sand Key Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: Please be advised that the zoning of the property identified as MaB 33.02, Sec. 17-29S-15E, a portion of which is proposed to be developed with an expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Hotel is zoned "B" (Business) with a Land Use Plan classification of Commercial /Tourist Facilities. Enclosed is a copy of the Land Use Plan map for the City of Clearwater and a copy of the Zoning Atlas identifying the designation of "B" zoning. There are no plans to amend either the zoning or Land Use Plan classification on this property as it now reflects the terms of the Settlement Stipulation, Circuit Civil No. 78-4765-7. These designations provide for hotel or residential use of the property. The allowable density is provided for in the stipulation and although it exceeds that provided for under the terms of the Land Use Plan, the stipulation shall prevail. These development rights shall remain in full force and effect for a period of twenty (20) years, or until October 17, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Paula Harvey Planning Director 813--462-6880 PH/jm Enclosures (2) 4-3 EXHIBIT i - C "Fyual Fmployn, en t and .4 frirmatirr :I rtion Employrr r f Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: PLANNING S URBAN DEVELOPMENT January 26, 1988 6 JAN' V'di;DE-TRIM Mr. David B. Gildersleeve Project Manager Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER,FLORIDA 33518-4748 RE: Sheraton Sand Key Please be advised that the zoning of the property identified as M&B 33.02, Sec. 17-29S-15E, a portion of which is proposed to be developed with an expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Hotel is zoned "B" (Business) with a Land Use Plan classification of Commercial/Tourist Facilities. Enclosed is a copy of the Land Use Plan map for the City of Clearwater and a copy of the Zoning Atlas identifying the designation of "B" zoning. There are no plans to amend either the zoning or Land Use Plan classification on this property as it now reflects the terms of the Settlement Stipulation, Circuit Civil No. 78-4765-7. These designations provide for hotel or residential use of the property. The allowable density is provided for =:n the stipulation and although it exceeds that provided for under the terms )f the Land Use Plan, the stipulation shall prevail. These development rights shall remain in full force and effect for a period of twenty (20) years, or until October 17, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact -his office. Sincerely, Paula Harvey Planning Director 813--462-6880 PH/jm Enclosures (2) 4-3 EXHIBIT 1 - C "1.(1 u a I / m plovnjen t and A ffirmni ii v A rf ion Em plo?'er- r GULF BOULEVARD V LEGEND DRI SUBJECT PROPERTY ' F fO w- D IT-8"Ct i o n Proposed Mitered End Section -C Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Storm Inlet -$ GULF OF MEXICO 0 50 100 150 200 n MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN hevised April 1988 SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT SultantS: Wade-Trim Edward D. Stone & Associate Nathan. Evans. Pounders & Tavlor ?i i ?i 11 N ,, . 1 I> ?, O 0 0.2 5 0. 5 SCALE IN MILES m `rhy ?Z. • ' . DREW ST, CLEVELAND ST. 01ESTNUT ST. GULF-TO-BAY ,.• BLVD. PROJECT SITE ` BELLEAIR RD. ??• y w O ? • m .' ? y w BELLEAIR W. BAY DR. E. BAY DR. CSWY. ULMERTON RD. 'O• rn J Y C m C G W W J Z WALSINGHAM RD. I v i SHERATON MAP ND KEY RESORT A GENERAL LOCATION EXHIBIT E mOo"m Wade-Trim M&I Engineering Landscape Architecture REVISED - APRIL 1988 3 - A Lwwl Planning Environmental Sciences 4-7 H t 3 S C) Cl) O =5 0 o m 1 C < CD 5' M m M v I C r Q-1 \j C) J GULF BLVD. SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT !Made-Trim aftf! ? LwWocope Ard tl. ? ? tcko==a TOPOGRAPHY REYMED - AML 1998 MAP C - I EXHiBE" 3 - ? I N V14 EL 15 0 500 1000 2000 V14 V14 EL 14 EL 14 V14 V14 EL 12 EL 15 . V14 All EL 13 EL 12 Gulf of M e x l c o All 1 PROJECT SITE Y • e E V14 p• EL 15 Clearwater 0 ? s J Harbor LEGEND Al - A30 , Zone of 100-Yr. flood ; base flood elevations 3 flood hazard factors determined. V14 EL 13 A11 V1 - V30 Zone of 100-Yr, coastal flood with velocity ; EL 11 base flood elevations d flood hazard factors ` not determined. EL 99 Base Flood Elevation All EL 12 • I ?AP SHERATON C - 2 SAND KEY RESORT FLOOD PLANS EXHIBIT Wade-Trim REVISED - APRIL 1988 3 - C Engineering Landscape Architecture M Planning Environmental Sciences 4-7 I Clearwater Harbor LEGEND 133 - Multiple Dwelling Units - Low Rise 134 - Multiple Dwelling Units - High Rise 181 - Swimming Beaches 185 - Parks 540 - Bays & Estuaries 710 - Beaches - Other than Swimming 322 - Coastal Scrub 11.96 Ac. SHERATON MAP SAND KEY RESORT LAND USE D & F Wade-Trim & VEGETATION EXHIBIT Engineering Landscape Architecture 3 D Planning Environmental Sclences REVISED - APRIL 1988 0 500 1000 2000 1 ?t I i 1 W 0 0.25 0.5 1 4 SCALE IN MILES CD Cs?r ??• • DREW ST. CLEVELAND ST. b7 - CHESTNUT ST. PROJECT SITE Z BELLEAIR RD. O o C, W y ` 0 CD er • k ` C ? O 2 C7 : w -•BELLEAIR W. BAY DR. CSWY. '` : . .. O ULMERTON RD. . moo. > y m G O u W W J Z O Z C Z WALSINGHAM RD. co E. BAY DR. GULF-TO-BAY BLVD. LEGEND Q WATER TREATMENT PLANT 0 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 0 POLICE STATION FIRE STATION ® HOSPITAL SI"ERATON SAND KEY RESORT Wade-Trim Engineering Landscape ArCAItecl Ure Planning Environmental Sciences 4-9 SERVICE AREAS REVISED - APRIL 1988 MAP I EXHIBIT 3' - E Table 20-1. Construction Expenditures and Employment Sheraton Sand Key Resort TYPE OF IMPACT IMPACT-TAMPA BAY REGION Total Amount Percentage $ in Region in Region o Construction Expenditures A. Labor $28,829,000 $27,387,550 95% B. Materials 28,563,000 14,100,000 50% C. Professional Services 1,885,000 925,000 50% D. Overhead 27,190,000 17,705,000 65% TOTAL 86,467,000 60,117,550 70% o Employment Projections A. Construction Employment 331 314 95% B. Employment Income (Labor) $28,829,000 $27,387,550 95% Source: Grand Couloir Corporation SSK1:33 4-10 0P^4%w E ?'' IM.F WaoErln7 c 11 EXHIBIT 4-A 6?.°6 Ch._dL 1 i? ?I ?I aF c Total 750 Tampa Bay % Impact to Tampa Unit Impact Region Impact Bay Region Project & Construction Management $2,189,430 2,189,430 100% Financing Fees 2,789,720 2,789,720 100% Legal 262,850 131,425 50% Permits and 1,851,550 1,851,550 100% Impact Fees FF&E 11,000,000 1,650,000 15% Interest Exp. 5,760,425 5,760,425 100% Systems 612,500 612,500 100% Pre-opening 660,000 660,000 100% Expenses Contingencies 2,060,000 2,060,000 1006t TOTAL $27,186,475 $17,705,050 65% Rounded $27,190,000 $17,705,000 65% SSK1:34 4-11 @1Q^Ey; MlG t WaQe-inrr. C 7 Li A 6!b.-99L EXHIBIT 4-B Table 20-2. Non-construction Permanent Employees and Estimated Annual Payroll by Season Normal Season Fersonnel Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over Executive 2 2 Rooms 97 32 5 2 Food & Beverage 102 93 10 2 Accounting 3 3 3 Telephone 5 Gift Shop 11 Sales/ Marketing 6 10 Maintenance 23 2 Pool 6 TOTAL 199 173 26 21 High Season Personnel Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over Executive < Rooms 120 38 6 2 Food & Beverage 151 126 11 2 Accounting 3 4 3 Telephone 6 Gift Shop 14 Sales/ Marketing 6 11 Maintenance 32 2 Pool 8 TOTAL 271 227 Annual payroll for all non-construction permanent employees is estimated at $5,060,000. C. FOR ALL TYPES OF EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, ALSO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. Table 20-3. Construction Employment by Income Group Construction Personnel - Per Annum Under $5,000- $7,000- 510,000- 515,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over HVAC Mechanics 22 Bricklayers/ Blocklayers 28 Carpenters 35 4-12 rPP^vr r? "` ?N aa? EXHIBIT 4-C r. t. ? E Construction Personnel - Continued Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 99 24 9 over Cement Masons 0 2 22 Electricians Elevator 8 Constructors 12 Glaziers 20 Ironworkers 22 Laborers 12 Lathers 16 Painters 16 Plasterers Plumbers/ 14 4 Pipefitters 1 Roofers Sheet Metal 16 Workers Soft Floor 14 Layers Sprinkler 8 Fitters 12 Tile Setters 4 Welders TOTAL 52 251 16 Power Equipment Operators Backhoe Bulldozer Compactor Crane Grader Piledriver TOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 52 257 22 Source: Grand Couloir Corporation SSK3:30 4-13 gp^kLIT F'.' IY.E C 7 C V.. - SY.-SE Waae-7rim Ire C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R ,POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34616.4748 December 15, 1987 Mr. Hung T. Mai, P.E. Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 RE: Sheraton Sand Key Expansion Sanitary Service Dear Mr. Mai: Your letter of November 9, 1987, regarding the above has been reviewed. The City of Clearwater's existing sanitary system can accommodate the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort described in your letter. Very truly yours, William C. Baker , Director of Public Works WCB:TCJ:jl copies: E. S. Haeseker, Asst. City Manager John Dennis, Briley Wild & Associates ZI_lq ^ual FmnlnvmPnt 2nd .Affirmative Action Employer' EXHIBIT j - ,t„• C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R T[ I G?•,??I' POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CL EARWATEE-L.OF-4DfV T-48-119?-,4748 18, 1988 February F 3 ^ L 1989 !Al kDE-T;;iU. Mr. Hung T. Mai, P.E. Wade-Trim. Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 RE: Sanitary Sewer Service Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Mr. Mai: Your inquiry of February 10, 1988, regarding additional sanitary sewer service to the above has been reviewed by Clearwater's engineering consultant. Clearwater has the ability to accommodate the sanitary flows as proposed in your letter for expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. Very truly yours, William C. Baker Director of Public Works WCB:TCJ:jl copy: E. S. Haeseker, Asst. City Manager °-'-5 EXHIBIT 5 - i ''Ecua! Employment and Affirmative Action Employer' < k C'11 ;?sq?gtER,??'` , OFFICE OF UTILITIES DIRECTOR C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R UTILITI E S D EPARTAI E I\ T POST OFFICE BOX 4749 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518 OFFICE AND DISPLAY ROOM, 900 CHESTNUT STREET November 19, 1987 Mr. Hung T. Mai, P.E. Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Re: Determination of Potable Water Supply for Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Mr. Mai: We have received your letter of November 9, 1987, requesting information regarding the ability of the City of Clearwater Utilities Department to provide potable water source for the proposed expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. Upon review of the network analysis of our water distribution system and discussions of this subject with our consulting engineer, it has been determined that the City of Clearwater will have no problems providing adequate potable water service to this facility. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (813) 462-6790 at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly, Cecil M. Hen erson, Jr., P.E. Utilities Director CMH:TRH:ns cc: Tom Hackett, Water Superintendent Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Assistant City Manager GAS ... WATER ... WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4-16 ... SOLID WASTE , EXHIBIT 6 - li S Office of Utilities Director C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4749 February 11, 1988 FEB I$ 1988 Mr. Hung T. Mai, P.E. Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Re: Determination of Potable Water Supply for Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Mr. Mai: I have received your letter dated February 10, 1988, requesting correspondence indicating the City of Clearwater"s ability to accommodate proposed expansion of hotel suites and residential condominiums at the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. Please be advised that I have reviewed your request and determined that the City has sufficient capabilities to provide 156,992 gallons of potable water per day to the above referenced development. If you should have any questions or comments, please contact me at (813) 462-6790 at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly, Cecil M. H erson, Jr., P.E. Utilities rilector CMH:bp cc: Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Assistant City Manager Tom Hackett, Water Superintendent 4-17 EXHIBIT 6 - CITY OF CLEARWATER II °??h I UTILITIE S DEPARTAI ENT POST OFFICE BOX 4749 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518 TER OFFICE AND DISPLAY ROOM 900 CHESTNUT STREET Utilities Director (813) 462-6790 November 21, 1987 Mr. Hung T. Mai, P. E. Wade-Trim, Incorporated 201 East Kennedy Boulevard Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Re: Determination of Refuse Collection and Disposal for Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Mai: Your letter concerning the City of Clearwater's ability to provide refuse collection and disposal to the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion was forwarded to my office on November 13, 1987. I have reviewed the proposed solid waste requirements and the City of Clearwater, Utilities Department, Sanitation Division will be able to dispose of the 7.7 cubic yards of solid waste you propose will be generated by that development each day. If I can be of further help, please feel free to call on me. Yours very truly, P Cecil lie rson, Jr., P. E. or Utilities D ct CMH:WJP:fa cc: Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Assistant City Manager 4 GAS ... WATER WATER POLLUTION CONTROL "Eaucl Employment a d lAfirmotive Action Employer" SOLID k1VASTE EXHIBIT 7 - A' fl C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R O?tttt POST OFFICE BOX 4749 t TEp?` ?t CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4749 f 1 \? .. Office of 1 I l a t t Utilities Director : February 11, 1988 FEB s 7983 VIA DE_ rr- Mr. Hung T. Mai, P.E. Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Re: Determination of Refuse Collection and Disposal for Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Mr. Mai: I have received your letter dated February 10, 1988, requesting correspondence indicating the City of Clearwater-s ability to accommodate proposed expansion of hotel suites and residential condominiums at the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. Please be advised that I have reviewed your request and determined that the City has sufficient capacities to dispose of the 12.7 cubic yards of solid waste cenera'ted daily by the above referenced development. If you should have any questions or comments, please contact me at (813) 462-6790 at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly, Cecil r?. He rson, Jr., P.E. Utilities irector 11 CMH : by cc: Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Assistant City Manager Wayman Pearson, Sanitation Superintendent 4-19 A EXHIBIT 7 - ''Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" kr r abo . R ? f ??'t+t CE Florida Power C O R P O R A T I O N Dear Mr. Mai: r r November 16, 1987 r Mr. Hung T. Mai Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 Subject: Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Clearwater, FL Per your request, I am happy to inform you that Florida Power has the necessary power facilities to connect your proposed 750 room hotel expansion for Sheraton Sand Key Resort. If we may be of further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate in calling us. Sincerely, r FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION Ernest E..-Baker, Supervisor Clearwater Engineering EEB/rp r r 2166 PALMETTO STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34625 A Florida Prooress Company 4-20 EXHIBIT 8 - A i?AAAt'? .o AAA ?• Florida Power CORPORATION February 15, 1988 r. F .? 1 ? `1[ ?? 1S 1 c ?y0 VV'k,DE-TF;r E Mr. Hung T. Mai Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 Subject: Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Mai: In reply to your letter of February 10, 1988, you are advised that Florida Power Corporation has the necessary power I facilities to connect your proposed 750 room hotel expansion f for Sheraton Sand Key Resort and any residential condominiums as well. ' If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION rp c: Mr. Bruce L. Power, Sr. Joseph P. Skala, Supervisor Clearwater Engineering 2166 PALMETTO STREET • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34625 A Florida Progress Company EXHIBITS - E 4-21 C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R \ ? v "_. ? r ' ? "L U T I L I T I E S D E P A R T M E N T 'POST OFFICE BOX 4749 ;, ? "ATER??' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518 ?I OFFICE OF OFFICE AND DISPLAY ROOM 900 CHESTNUT STREET UTILITIES DIRECTOR December 2, 1987 Mr. H>>na T. Mai, P.F. 11ade-Trim, Inc. 201 F. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334 Tampa, Florj Ia 33602 Dear Mr. Mai: Thank you for your letter concerning the proposed expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The City of Clearwater has a four-inch high-pressi-,,re gas main on G>>lf Boulevard that currently serves the Sheraton. This gas main has ample volume to meet all future natural gas requirements of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort and its proposed expansion. The City of Clearwater and its Gas Division look forward to working with the Sheraton Sand Ivey Resort in the .future. You rs very truly, Cecil M. H Berson, Jr., P.E. Utilities Director CMH:JML:mw 4 GAS ... WATER ... WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4-22 _I anc !firmc'?e A::I?an EmeI o v e ... SOLID WASTE EXHIBIT 9 11 April 25, 1988 Ms. Bonnie Prinse Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Dear Ms. Prinse: Department of Police Office of Police Chief City of Clearwater 644 Pierce Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 813/462/6332 As a follow-up to my prior letter of January 26, 1988 concerning the proposed expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key. Resort, I wish to inform you of additional information with regard to the requirement for additional police personnel which was not available at the time of my original letter. ' I am pleased to announce that subsequent to January of 1988, the City of Clearwater now has an operational police sub-station located on the south end of Clearwater Beach with sufficient manpower at the present time to deal with providing police service to Sand Key which I do not feel will be specifically impacted by the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. Rather, my initial comments in the letter of January 26, 1988 were directed at the total building expansion on Sand Key that I feel is going to impact the requirement for the expansion of police services in the future. Please contact me if you need any further clarification with regards to my position on this matter. Sincerely, SID KLEIN Chief of Police SRK:bw EXHIBIT 10 h? 19888 WADE-TRIM 4-23 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518-4748 Office of Fin Chief Robert L Davidson October 27, 1987 Ms. Bonnie Prinse Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 Dear Ms. Prinse: In response to your recent letter, the Clearwater Fire Department is aware of the proposed expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The Fire Department does not feel any expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key would have an adverse affect on the department's ability to continue to provide emergency medical service or fire protection. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. Very truly yours,. C. F. M,eye^ Asst. Fire Chief CFM/bak EXHIBIT 11 "Equal Employment and Affirme'tive Action Employer" 4-24 0 0.25 0.5 1 J SCALE IN MILES o m ?Yy ?• DREW ST. O C-EVELAND ST. CHESTNUT ST. PROJECT SITE m• Qo' cry Q' 2 ?O 0 z J S S BELLEAIR RD. 0 c 0 c? J Q W r 3 c w e O y y 2 d ?BELLEAIR CSW Y. • z % 0 WALSINGHAM RD. W. BAY 0R. ULMERTON E. BAY DR. O m C W W 7? t7 S? C lJ to SR 60/ GULF-TO-BAY BLVD. SR 466 SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT Wade-Trim Engineering LanCscaps Architeeture Plenning Environmental Sciences 4-25 C J EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK REVISED - APRIL 1988 EXHIBIT 12 1 < CC) < ¢ ° co r ¢ -j r- k CV) LLJ -j Z .- N U) R L0 Z ¢ Z a) COO + F- V LL M 00 IL co 0 N co t° ti 1676+481724 r N MARIANNE w 1069+48-1117 1356+481404 0 + + ? C•e COO > CAUSEWAY BLVD. MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY 15 84 1663 1344+79-1423 2145+79-2224 COURT ST. A CV) ¢ s?, I o CO ?? Ir = 6, l? rs to tt C0 N J x? ° to cD rD .° s°? B LEGEND 6''6 S'y61 PROJECT co 0 LO SITE ? 222+i 3-255 \ + 1 CV) N 1qr (0 N u BACKGROUND + SANDKEY _ TOTAL TRAFFIC 14, TRAFFIC TRAFFIC LO Cl) co N ° to It I CID O cr) 379+69=448 cY) BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY N c o 379+42=421 `D J s cD co + LL °+' 1055+56-1111 Cl) tie WALSINGHAM RD. ° 754+34-788 O N rn U) .? O CD SHERATON 1997 P.M. PEAK HOUR EXHIBIT SAND KEY RESORT BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 13 Wade-Trim REVISED - APRIL 1988 Engineering Landscape Archltectur• Planning Environmental Sciences -26 i 11 11 r SECTION 5 ALTERNATE RESIDENTIAL USE TOWER 2 Err^!E E.' li.t Waoe- i nm v @6..®L C An additional section of this Sufficiency Response is provided to further clarify questions raised by the review agencies and response by the applicant concerning the option of developing the second tower for 267 residential condominium units as opposed to 322 hotel suites. As noted earlier in this Sufficiency Response, a Settlement Stipula- tion, Circuit Civil No. 78-4765-7, provides for the development of either hotel or residential uses on the property. Recognizing that this option is available, the following supplemental information to the DRI/ADA is provided to identify the impacts/demands of the alternate use (i.e. residential condominium) upon the regional roadway system and other applicable facilities and services provided by the City of Clearwater. Please refer to the attached tables 21-1, 23-1, 24-1 and 25-1 which reflect consumption/demand for sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and energy. Commitment letters have been received and included in this Sufficiency Response for each facility type/service. Recognizing that the option of constructing the second tower as residential condominiums will require less natural gas than the first option, additional correspondence from the Utilities Department of the City of Clearwater is not required. SSY.3: 32 5-1 e/I^E17 F _?' i?\' 1'JaJE Tnn- C ! C4 in.-?G 1 1 QUESTION 21 PUBLIC FACILI TIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT Table 21-1. Ultimate Esti mated Average Dai ly Wastewater Flows. J AVERAGE DAILY PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE(a) FLOW (GPD)(b) ' FIRST BUILDING Hotel Suite 428 rooms 100 gpd/room 42,800 Lobby Bar 75 seats 30 gpd/seat 2,250 Entertainment Lounge 250 seats 30 gpd/seat 7,500 ' Cafe & Dining 400 seats 50 gpd/seat 20,000 Bar (Lounge) 150 seats 30 gpd/seat 4,500 Retails 2,374 SF 0.1 gpd/SF 237 Health Spa/ 680 Day Care 3,780 SF 0.18 gpd/SF Ballroom/ Meeting rooms 1,400 seats 3 gpd/seat 4,200 Subtotal 82,167 ' SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 1) Hotel Suite 322 rooms 100 gpd/room 32,200 f Subtotal 32,200 Total (Option No. 1 Development) 114,367 GPD SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 2) CONDOMINIUMS ' o One Bedroom 54 units 150/gpd/unit 8,100 o Two Bedroom 213 units 225/gpd/unit 47,925 Subtotal 56,025 Total (Option No. 2 Development) 138,192 GPD (a) - Source: Wastewater Engineering, Metcalf & Eddy, 1972. Chapter 1OD-6, Rules of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (b) - Assumed to be 100% occupied SSK3:31(1) 5-2 P.'' 16t N'aoe-Trrt, C ? 7 rv^`? TABLE 1-PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION - IIOTEL ROOMS Background 8 Pro- Typical Backgro E s ? und Traffic F wo rr oject Traffic " -3F jecttTT_r a ffic Back round Background I Project -- S LOS D Contributed Indicated Road•ay Sectl On m S i iEB TWI N8/E8 S7{/1W CAPACITY 7 V71: ru by Project Improvement Gulf at d. waltingh/n to 4th 2LU 105 177 70 114 775 887 710 1.09 E 1.25 E 17.8 71. U 4t1 to Park 2LU 7o5 777 II 28 716 801 110 1.09 E 1.13 E 4.4 --- TABLE 2 - rRO1ECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION IIOIEL POOMS I COIIDOS Background I Pro- A Typical i S back round Traffic A6)E? TRJW6 Project Traf/ic A8% S -Sam Ject Traffic f7? B-S a Ba c1 round round L Pr aJect • - T lOS D Cont rlbuteA InA1UteA ok May ect on NB/E 6J CAPACITY i ITf P S Dy Prof tit lnprov event Blvd. G .If W iktnghm to 4th 2LU 705 777 26 82 171 855 710 1.09 E 1.20 E 12.8 7LV SSR2:2] m m r m m m m m m r m r 1 li ?I ?l j po-ORK t V.. A QUESTION 23 PUBLIC FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY Table 23-1 Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands. PROJECT ELEMENT FIRST BUILDING PROJECT AMOUNT AVERAGE DAILY GENERATION RATE(a) FLOW (GPD)(b) Hotel Suite Lobby Bar Entertainment Lounge Cafe & Dining Bar (Lounge) Retails Health Spa/ Day Care Ballroom/ Meeting rooms 428 rooms 120 gpd/room 51,360 75 seats 30 gpd/seat 2,250 250 seats 30 gpd/seat 7,500 400 seats 50 gpd/seat 20,000 150 seats 30 gpd/seat 4,500 2,374 SF 0.16 gpd/SF 380 3,780 SF 0.24 gpd/SF 907 1,400 seats 3 gpd/seat 4,200 Subtotal 91,097 SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 1) Hotel Suite 322 rooms 120 gpd/room 38,640 Subtotal 38,640 Total (Option No. 1 Development) 129,737 GPD SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 2) Condominiums o One Bedroom 54 units 175/gpd/unit 9,450 o Two Bedroom 213 units 265/gpd/unit 56,445 Subtotal 65,895 Total (Option No. 2 Development) 156,992 GPD (a) Source: Wade-Trim, Inc., 1987 (b) Assumed to be 100% occupied SSK3:31(2) 5-3 Wade-7nm QUESTION 24 PUBLIC FACILITIES: SOLID WASTE Table 24-1 Estimated Daily Volumes of Solid Waste. PROJECT PROJECT GENERATION RATE (a) AVERAGE DAILY SOLID ELEMENT AMOUNT WASTE GENERATION (b) LBS./DAY C.Y./DAY(c) FIRST BUILDING Hotel & Amenities 428 rooms 2.5 Lbs/Room/Day 1070 4.4 SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 1) Hotel & Amenities 322 rooms 2.5 Lbs/Room/Day 805 Total (Option No. 1 Development) 1,875 SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 2) Condomi n i u:ns o One Bedroom 54 units b lbs/unit/day 324 o Two Bedroom 213 units 8 lbs/unit/day 1,704 Total (Option No. 2 Development) 3,098 (a) Source: Sheraton Sand Key Historical Usage (b) Assume to be 100% occupied (c) Assume 243 pounds per cubic yard SSK3:31(3) 5-4 3.3 7.7 1.3 7.0 12.7 Cr^atE P.' Il ! Vv a:) e - Tr rr C ? 7 891.?LC Mr-IRK! QUESTION 25 PUBLIC FACILITIES: ENERGY Table 25-1. Ultimate Estimated Average Daily Electrical Energy Consumption. PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE(a) ENERGY PROJECTION ADD PD (b) (KWH) T KW) FIRST BUILDING Hotel & Amenities 428 rooms 38.3 KWH/RM 16,392 1,498 SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 1) Hotel & Amenities 322 rooms 38.3 KWH/RM 12,655 1,127 Total (Option No. 1 Development) 29,047 2,625 SECOND BUILDING (OPTION NO. 2) Condominiums 267 units 45 KWH/UNIT 12,015 2,136 Total (Option No. 2 Development) 28,407 3,634 (a) Source: Sheraton Sand Key Historical Usage (b) PD = 3.5 KW/RM SSK,3: 31(4 ) 5-5 1,.acje-1nm QUESTION 31 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES: TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS The following additional data are presented to illustrate the impacts of developing Tower 2 for 267 residential condominium units as opposed to 322 hotel suites as provided for in the previously referenced Civil Court Settlement Stipulation. As outlined in the ADA, the development of Towers 1 & 2 as hotel suites generates the following peak hour trips: o 750 Hotel rooms X 0.80 trips/room = 600 Trips The PI4 pear, hour trip generation for Towers 1 & 2 hotel and condomin- ium is as follows: o 428 Hotel rooms X 0.80 trips/room = 342 o 267 Condos X 0.51 trips/Condo = 136 478 Trips The attached tables illustrate the roadway link (i.e. Gulf Boulevard from Walsingham to 4th Avenue) impacted by the proposed development based on the two development alternates. Further, Exhibit 31-6 is provided to graphically illustrate project trip distribution at Gulf Boulevard and 4th Avenue. The origin-destination survey conducted by Wade-Trim in preparing the ADA submittal was conducted between 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. on September 22, 24 and 28, 1987 and yielded the following results: o Of the 42 motorists that were leaving the Sheraton Sand Ivey and traveling south, 16 responded that they were traveling to destinations south of Walsingham Road. Twelve of the respon- dents stated they were going to Indian Rocks Beach or Crabby Bills Restaurant. Only four were traveling to sites below Indian Rocks Beach. o Of the 80 motorists that were entering the Sheraton Sand Key from origins south of the site, eight stated they were arriving from locations south of Walsingham Road. Five of the respondents stated they were coming from Indian Rocks Beach. The distribution included in the ADA showed that 114 project vehicles traveled south of Walsingham Road and did not track what those vehicles did beyond the intersection of Gulf Boulevard and Walsingham Road. The attached revised 1997 Project Trip Distribution extends the study area to the south in order to better display project traffic. 5-6 Lpp^ar E:' ILA v;2 F C 3 From this distribution, based on the origin-destination study, Tables ' 1 & 2 were prepared. These tables display for the additional links I the same information that Table 2A of the ADA displayed. Based on this more detailed analysis, the only roadway link that the project impacts will be Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham Road and 4th Avenue. The costs to improve this link are estimated to be: IMPACT FEE 750 rooms x $589/room = $441,750 ' 428 rooms x $589/room = $252,092 267 condo x $454/room = $121,218 - $373,310 I DCA RULE 114 - (710-773) x ($371,512 x 1.18)* x (0.1)** = $17,848.50 * Cost based on FOOT 1987 Cost Per Mile Table (Oct. 22, 1987) with ` 18% allowance for purchase of right-of-way ** Length of Link is approximately 400' = 0.1 mile The developer's Fair Share contribution of $17,848.50, based upon the b ' etween link of Gulf Boulevard impacts of the project upon the 400 Walsingham and 4th Avenue, is considerably less than the exactions for compliance with Pinellas County's Transportation Impact Fee. In an effort to reduce the impact on the roadway network of the f additional 750 rooms, the Sheraton Sand Key is proposing to reduce the the hotel through the use of transporta- d b t y e number of trips genera tion system management (TSM) strategies. These strategies will serve to mitigate the impact of hotel traffic, not through the construction ' of additional roadway lanes, but through responsible management policies of the hotel. ' Typically, roadways are designed and built to provide sufficient capacity for average conditions, estimated by average annual daily traffic volumes. Likewise, the hotel should be examined during average conditions and should not be required to mitigate the impact of conditions when it is 100 percent occupied as this is not the average condition. In the Sheraton Sand Key Resort's area there are seven (7) hotel properties which due to both proximity and market i served are considered primary competitors. To illustrate the appropriateness of utilizing a 73% occupancy rate for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort, please refer to the following Table which compares ' I Sheraton's facility with other area hotels. 1 5-8 Wi^SC ' r . IL??E. VcaCe 1 ; tq\A Estimated Facility Rooms Occupancy Sheraton Sa nd Key 390 70-75% Hilton Inn - Clearwater 207 70-75% Don Cesar - St. Petersburg Branch 270 80-85% Holiday Inn - Surfside 428 70-75% Trade Winds 381 70-75% Adams Mark Carib. Gulf 206 70-75% Innisbrook - Tarpon Springs 975 55-65% Marriott - Marco Island 742 65-70% Source: Leventhol & Horwath/Sheraton Sand Key Therefore, this analysis amends Table 31-2B in the original Application for Development Approval (ADA) and is based on the fact that the estimated annual occupancy rate for the Sheraton Sand Key is 73 percent as illustrated in this section. MITIGATION TECHNIQUES In order to reduce the number of trips generated by the facility on both a daily and a peak hour basis, the Sheraton Sank Key will enact several new policies and programs. These policies and their impact on traffic are discussed below. o Employee Shuttle In order to reduce the number of employee trips from the project, the hotel will operate a shuttle between the Indian Rocks Beach area and the hotel. This shuttle will operate on a regular basis to carry employees between the hotel and their cars. Data collection by the hotel determined that almost 13 percent of the hotel staff complete their work and leave the hotel between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m. Since work shifts are set by the hotel, this is a percentage that can be maintained by hotel management. Using the same distribution of traffic presented in the ADA, there will be 43 southbound employee trips on Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham and 4th Avenue during the P.M. peak hour at project build-out. These 43 employee trips will be removed from the roadway network and replaced with two trips of the shuttle for a reduction of 41 trips on the roadway link. o Parlor Car Service for Guests The Sheraton Sand Key proposes to operate a regularly scheduled shuttle (parlor car) service between the hotel and desired guest destinations to the south during P.M. peak and evening hours. The fixed travel route will be southward since the Clearwater Trolley 5-9 0.^%r F . IL X Vdc? - . r.^ ? . ? r ' takes guests from the hotel to Clearwater Beach. The shuttle l vehicle will be a custom designed luxury vehicle. Schedules wil be established to meet the needs of guests, making this an attractive and convenient alternative to driving. From the analysis in the ADA, it was estimated that there would be 83 total southbound trips to Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham and 4th Avenue during the P.M. peak hour. Since 43 of these trips will be employees, as was previously calculated, there will be 40 trips by guests. From a survey of guests conducted by the Sheraton Sand Key during March, 1988, it was found that approximately 85 percent of the guests would use the shuttle vehicle to reach their destinations. Replacing 85 percent of the vehicle trips with two shuttle trips would reduce the project traffic on the Gulf Boulevard link by an additional 34 vehicle trips. o Other Mitigation Techniques In order to reduce building costs and reduce traffic to the Sheraton Sand Key, the hotel proposes to relocate its laundry and bakery to the mainland. This will eliminate both employee and service vehicle trips that are related to these services. This trip reduction will not be strongly related to a peak hour, but L will serve to reduce the total trips generated by the facility throughout the day. It is anticipated that the relocation of support services will result in the reduction of employee trips and service vehicle trips. ' Link Analysis In the ADA, the only roadway link that operated at an unacceptable level of service, and on which project traffic was greater than five percent of the link capacity, was Gulf Boulevard between Walsingham and 4th Avenue. On the link, project traffic comprised 13.0 percent of the roadway capacity. In summary, through the proposed TSM mitigation techniques, project traffic on that link during the P.M. peak hour has been reduced from 83 vehicles to 8 vehicles and project traffic will comprise only 1.1 percent of the roadway capacity, indicating that no further measures beyond those previously identified will be required of the Sheraton Sand Key. SSK3:32 5-10 Ee? i 6s.?LOC yrq r il.t- wF ; ; T ?? ' ?4 i k ..': Vz _ ?" •`fF 7" .s2 I1f1.a T' +? -... ?^a 'd Y 1 ;- ? j_ _ ' ?? y ??, l. i . . p . . , _ < ? , `77? _ i M.5 i?,?, All IJ . r • AI J .r cal ?,'pv, x , ? . rr 0 1- m t1' IA t' s : G r u ? a m -, , f %o 00 "0'': K, $ per'.' a • 7 ??? ?.(1 ? ?R ? t t '.tr ?h ! ?. ? ? '? w, ,fir.. ?S'" S Fa? ??` ,? 91 - .ate Wea3. rul -r .8 f N . , ?? y t 1 c, ,_ ! ?\?k?2 `-f ?:Y? ff.a?l`t?n4?.7 ?. L.Jr.Ai?, {_.,? i?. r t r 9 ? y 41 eve Q o t T :nngir7eerirrg Landscprite tuce` funning aEnvironrnentat??°?n?e- ' 201 E: Kerinedy'Bhrd. Suite 334 Tarn?) cj, FL 2L3 0, O i `??® Group Services: Engineering Planning Sciences Landscape Architecture Wade-Trim ORIGINAL Ms. Sheila Benz Planning Director Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Development of Regional Impact # 179 Dear Ms. Benz: October 6, 1987 On behalf of Grand Couloir Corporation, the developer of the above captioned project, we are hereby submitting forty-five (45) copies of the Preapplication Narrative Summary to initiate the Application for Development Approval (ADA) process. This. summary includes the transportation study parameters as established at the September 17, 1987, Transportation Methodology meeting. Please contact me at your earliest convenience, if you have any questions. Sincerely, WADE RIM, IN illiam A. 0 kunzzi Vice President WAO:mh ZZZ2067.01 cc: Ms. Pat Alsup Mr. Russ Kimball SSK2:2 'iAA', r^. SAY RFC-ZONAL PLANNING COUNCIL Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard ¦ Suite 334 ¦ Tampa, Florida 33602 ', Member of the Wade-Trim Group 813-221-2090 ¦ telecopier: 813-229-0974 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO I. Introduction 1 II. Applicant Information 1 III. Project Location 1 IV. Project Description 3 V. Land Use and Zoning 3 VI. Phasing Schedule 3 VII. Environmental Features Summary 4 VIII. Transportation Methodology 4 IX: Request for Waiver of ADA Questions 6 X. Legal Descriptions g i /\ Wade-Trim L L sA t I. Introduction` In accordance with Chapter 380.06(7), Florida Statutes, prior to filing an Application for Development Approval (ADA), a Preapplication Conference is required to identify regional issues and the level of information required for inclusion in the ADA. This project narrative is hereby submitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council for utilization at the Preapplication Conference. II. Application Information Applicant: Developer: DRI Consulting Planners & Engineers: III. Project Location Grand Couloir Corporation 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Grand Couloir Corporation 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 .The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S, Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as MAP 1. A legal description of the 11.96 acre (MOL) site is provided in Section X. 1 Wade-Trim t Light 11 ij • i I1?t ? ?'c? t .Light r • ???.? 111 -"••lD "ECT .LOCATION"?.i chil TZ fit, `,_ ? J ? ?? , / • 'cc ear"ter Pass - (WAN) Light , .. f \ \ ? ?lilht t1 r _ , •l. roroe p4m s YNNN Twit tight ! t vV 'i ? r o° / u, -'_ -:R4nt 'c Goo cao.. ' 1Beaeh N/ r Hp 1- ,ash?Y ? ... .e g, a - h. 1 f-l s tto.t i ..: i LOCATION MAP Wade-Trim r Engineering Landscape Architecture e Planning Environmental Sciences r.hY. ? A. } flu I,j ?F •n Shea umJ,l R ??Mt • RS ? ?r ayI R? Btl9c pp 1'? li co?trv -cov.11 : C ?I -1'jj?Jl CoIt,CO?.s tp owho ?? ' ?.r t?l?. 15 ,?o C mil 8 ? mrhv.nat?l _- _ ? eC k? tl p?r :?'e n? I ' jllelW4? I„ ? ld ? (' IaYerk? n Gm ,L_ s`D yy ppp 1, I - tc WI: t y II? I I j PNh ffLL .7.dIlI ' . I I .y{' t ;Beuetnt. -,-. -. jh I, 2? j. S _ I: 4 Y L No ion .. V p P k . ^?^ ec: cl ehr? e 1 ^t' eftl " a ?° ,r, '" a Ir h z rp 1 ur it ?' • Nich ..h . ti. LARGO MAP SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT 1 IV. Project Description Planned for the expansion of the existing 390 room resort is the addition of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities. The project is scheduled for a single phase, 10 year build-out period and will include two towers . incorporating all suite hotel rooms, conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa, indoor pool, lounges and housekeeping area. The new tower will have its own lobby and will be connected to the existing tower by a soft connection such as a walkway. The existing tower will undergo some, mostly decorative, renovation to coincide with the expansion. The site accomodating future expansion encompasses 11.96 acres (MOL) and construction is scheduled for a June 1988 start. V. Land Use and Zoning The existing land use on the 11.96 acre (MOL) site is unimproved vacant land. The City of Clearwater's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the site as "Commercial Tourist Facility," and "Recreation and Open Space" for the portion of the site lying seaward of the coastal construction control line. The site is " " ' classified Commercial Tourist CR-28 on the City s adopted zoning map. The land uses planned for the development are consistent with the City's adopted comprehensive plan and zoning regulations as well as the established character of development along the barrier islands. Adjacent existing uses include high density residential to the south, the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort to the North and vacant undeveloped lands to the east along Clearwater Harbor. The Gulf of Mexico is west of the project. It is important to note that the site of the proposed Sheraton Sand Key Resort expansion was the subject of recent litigation whereby future development densities and ownership of accreted lands were established by a decision of the Florida Supreme Court. The Florida Supreme Court held that the owners of upland property own all of the accreted lands adjacent to its property. Therefore, the development proposal for the expansion utilizes the densities established by the Courts as well as appropriate densities available through accreted lands adjacent to the existing resort site and proposed expansion site. VI. Phasing Schedule The Sheraton Sand Key Resort expansion is proposed to be developed over a ten-year buildout period. Initial Wade-Trim I m\t.:°m development activity will include the construction of a 428 unit tower and associated ammenities followed by the renovation of the existing facilities and the construction of a second tower including approximately 322 suites and associated ammenities. VII. Environmental Features Summary The Sheraton Sand Key Resort lies on the Gulf coast side of Sand Key, a barrier island incorporated within the City of Clearwater and connected to the mainland at several points along the intracoastal waterway (i.e. Sand Key Bridge, Belleair Beach Causeway, etc.). As is the case with a majority of land along the Gulf coast, Sand Key has experienced a high level of development and has already been subjected to extensive alterations. The vacant portion of the property to the south of the existing facility contains little vegetation other than low-lying shrub plants and grasses. Sand Key consists of Made Land (Ma) soils containing mixed sand, clay, hard rock, shells and shell fragments that have been transported, reworked, and leveled by ` earth moving equipment. The beach area consists of tide washed sands that border the islands (Co-Coastal Beaches) and are covered during storms and daily at high tide. Beaches provide habitat for shore birds, marine invertebrates and salt-tolerant grasses and plants and will be enhanced at the Sheraton Sand Key Resort through sand dune restoration and sea oat plantings. Wade-Trim is aware of and will address in the ADA the seasonal nesting of sea trutles on Sand Key. An appropriate management program will be presented in the ADA for review by appropriate agencies. The site is contained within the velocity flood zone V and zone A, as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. VIII. Transportation Methodology Based upon the Transportation Methodology meeting held on -September 21, 1987, the DRI Transportation Analysis will be performed using the assumptions outline below. The study area will encompass that area where project traffic comprises 4.5 percent or more of LOS D peak hour capacity of a facility (intersection or link) and where the facility is operating at worse than LOS D. For intersections, the percent of capacity will be determined using procedures from Circular 212. For roadway links, the percent of capacity will be determined using the FDOT daily and the UTPS hourly Generalized Capacity tables. 4 /:Z I?a Wade-Trim [ 3 i Regional roadways that are anticipated to be in the study area include Gulf Boulevard, SR 60, Ulmerton/Walsingham Road, the Clearwater Causeway, Belleair/West Bay and Court/Chestnut Streets. A P.M. peak hour analysis will be performed. Both intersection and roadway link analyses will be conducted. This scenario represents the worst-case traffic conditions for most types of development. Both the A.M. and Noon peak conditions will be examined using hourly traffic volume counts that Wade-Trim will collect on Gulf Boulevard. These two time periods will be analyzed to determine if the volumes are significant enough to warrant inclusion into the DRI. The results of this analysis will be distributed to the review agencies in a supplemental memorandum for sign off by the agencies. Where available, existing traffic volumes will be obtained from the FDOT, Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater. Count data from 1987 is expected to be available for most locations. Counts from 1985 and 1986 will be increased by correlating 85/86 counts with 87 counts to estimate 1987 conditions. Locations that do not have count data from 1985 or later will be counted by Wade-Trim. All counts will be seasonally adjusted to approximate average conditions. Future background traffic will be calculated using an annual growth factor. The growth factor will be determined based upon the build-out of projects on Sand Key. Data on future land use will be provided, projected trips will be estimated using the ITE Trip Generation report and a trip distribution will be deve opeed based on existing volumes. Through this process, the projected future growth rate will be determined. This growth rate will be distributed to the review agencies for comment. The ITE Trip Generation report gives a trip rate for hotels located outside a central business district, usually in a suburban area. The Sheraton Sand Key does not fit this description, nor does it fit the ITE description of a resort hotel. Therefore, a five-day count will be conducted at the existing facility and the P.M. peak hour trip rate per occupied room will be calculated. This rate will be sent to the review agencies for comment. No internal capture or transit use reductions will be asked for since the rate will be based on actual counts from the facility. 5 I.\ I\7 Wade-Trim 1 3 The distribution of the project trips will be developed using.the existing distribution of guests and employees, and engineering judgment. An origin-destination study will be conducted to determine the current distribution of P.M. peak period hotel traffic. This distribution will be the basis for projected future trips. The proposed distribution will be sent to review agencies for approval. The intersection analysis of future traffic will be conducted using both Circular 212 and 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) techniques. A Critica Movement Analysis CMA will first be conducted. If the intersection is operating at LOS C or better with project traffic included, or if project traffic is less than 4.5 percent of LOS D capacity, no further analysis will be conducted. If both thresholds are exceeded, an analysis will be performed using the 1985 HCM analysis techniques to determine any necessary mitigation measures. The roadway link volumes will be compared to the Generalized Capacity tables to determine project traffic impact. For both analyses, roadway improvements with construction funds committed for Fiscal Years 1988-89 and 1989-90 will be considered in the analysis as in-place. Existing and future public transportation information will be obtained from PSTA. In addition, shuttle information for guests traveling from the hotel to regional airports and local beaches will be obtained from the hotel. IX. Request for Waiver of ADA Questions It is requested that the following ADA questions be deleted, or the responses modified from review because of the minimal impacts anticipated or because they are not applicable to the proposed project. Further, recognizing that construction plans for the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort facility were submitted to the City of Clearwater prior to July 1, 1975, and that hotel thresholds were not established until 1985, the ADA will address only those issues covering the proposal expansion (See Appendix A). Question Reason for Deletion/Modification # 16 (Wetlands) The site is void of wetlands, Delete hence responses to'this question are not necessary. 6 V- It i\\ Wade-Trim I 7 LNNNvA # 18 (Vegetation & Due to its urban nature, and the Wildlife) Modify fact that the site has been by requiring a disturbed, unusual or unique response to sea vegetative associations on the turtle questions site are not present. With the only exception of needed study and analysis pertaining to the seasonal nesting of sea turtles along Sand Key, a waiver of other questions pertaining to wildlife is appropriate given the urban character and disturbed nature of the site. All questions will be responded to with regard to the sea turtles. # 19 (Historical and The site has expanded primarily Archaeological Sites) through accretion and extensively Delete disturbed in recent years, thereby possessing little or no potential for historical or archaeological resources. # 21 (Wastewater The response to this question will Management) Modify be limited to identifying project demand and providing written documentation of the local government's ability to serve the proposed development. # 22 (Drainage) The proposed resort expansion will Modify be required to meet all local and state drainage on site retention requirements. All questions will be responded to with regard to local and state permitting requirements. # 23 (Water Supply) The response to this question will Modify be limited to identifying project demand and providing written documentation of the local government's ability to serve the proposed development. # 24 (Solid Waste) The response to this question will Modify be limited to identifying project demand and providing written confirmation of the local government's ability to serve the proposed development. or"qu t ? ] 7. Wade-Trim # 26 (Education) The proposed project 'involves no Delete residential units, therefore impacts to the school system will be negligible. ' # 28 (Health Care) The proposed project will not Delete provide on-site medical or health care facilities, and will have a negligible impact on area facilities. # 29 (Police) The response to this question will Modify be limited to providing written confirmation of local government's ability to serve the proposed development. # 30 (Fire) The response to this question will Modify be limited to providing written confirmation of local government's ability to serve the proposed development. # 32 (Housing) The proposed project will not Delete include residential units, ' therefore the housing market will not be affected. 8 ¦r^"¦ I__\I\7 Wade-Trim 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r„ Ohl-Am X. Legal Description The Northerly 408.21 feet of Parcel D (also known as Site V, Sand Key) being a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: For a point of reference commence at the Section corner common to Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20 of said Township and Range, as now established as having the coordinates (based on the Pinellas County Grid System) of North 16500.72, East 31452.98; thence run N. 89 10'31"E., along the Section line dividing said Sections 17 and 20, a distance of 843.47 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Gulf Boulevard (State Road No. 208) as now established as a 100 foot right of way; thence S. 42°13'31"W. along said centerline a distance of 263.93 feet to a point; thence N.470 46'29"W., a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwesterly right of way line of said Gulf Boulevard; thence run N.42 13'31"E., along said Northwesterly right of way line, a distance of 241.79 feet for the point of Beginning; thence continue N.420 13'31"E along said right of way a distance of 408.21 feet; thence run N.47b46'29"W., a distance of (776.5 feet more or less deed) (1391 feet more or less field) to the mean high water line (elevation 1.2 feet N.G.V.D. dated 9/23/87), of the Gulf of Mexico; thence run Southerly along said mean high water line a distance of 475 feet more or less to a point that lies N.470 46'29"W., and 1149 feat more or less distant from the Point of Beginning; thence run S.47 46'29"E., a distance of 1149 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning, containing 11.9588 acres more or less. SSK2.2 9 Wade-Trim t LN -h.?A I Group Services: Engineering Planning Sciences Landscape Architecture Wade-Trim APPENDIX A October 1, 1987 Mr. Tom Beck Department of Community Affairs Division of Resource Planning & Management Howard Building 2571 Executive Center Circle E. Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Re: Sheraton Sand Key Resort - City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Beck: This letter follows my discussion on Friday, September 18, 1987, with Mr. Larry Keysey, General Counsel, by providing a project description and chronology of events surrounding the development of the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort in the City of Clearwater. Also outlined herein is a description of the proposed development activity associated with the expansion of the resort facility which is scheduled to commence in June, 1988. This letter does not represent a request for vesting of development rights, but more appropriately requests concurrence by the Department of Community Affairs that the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort development clearly predates any applicable DRI threshold requirements established for hotels, hence the existing development would be exempt from the DRI Application for Development Approval (ADA) preparation and review processes with respect to the proposed expansion. A chronology of pertinent dates surrounding the development of the existing Sheraton Sand Key'Resort is as follows: December 29, 1972 Date of the Building Loan Agreement and Mortgage. Mortgagee -.Chase Manhattan Mortgage an Rea ty Trust. Mortgagor - Key Inn, Inc. (Photo copy enc osed. January 11, 1973 Recording of Mortgage Pinellas County, Florida (Photo copy enclosed.) June 20, 1973 Master Site Plan & Construction Plans for Sheraton Sand Key Resort Submitted to City of Clearwater. (Photo copy enclosed.) Wade-Trim, Inc. Memher of tha Warin-Trim (;roi in 2.01 E. Kennedy Boulevard - Suite 334 - Tampa. Florida 33602 R1'i-221-2nQn - tplprnnipr R11-PPQ-OQ74 Mr. Tom Beck ' October 1, 1987 Page 2 ' The existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located on a 16 acre (MOL) site immediately south of Pinellas County's Sand Key Park within the City of Clearwater. Existing development includes 390 guest rooms, including 15 executive suites, restaurants, gift shops, two ballrooms, seven conference rooms, outdoor leisure and recreational amenities and 424 parking spaces. The proposed expansion, while still in the preliminary design stages, envisions the addition of two towers incorporating approximately 750 suites, conference rooms, retail space, day care facility, restaurants, health club and spa, indoor pool, lounges and housekeeping areas. A common lobby will connect the new building areas to the existing 8 story tower which will also ' undergo renovations to coincide with the expansion. While the scale of the proposed expansion clearly requires that it comply with current DRI threshold requirements as outlined in Chapter 27F-2 FAC, and is subject to the DRI review process, the - factual data outlined above with respect to the initiation of development activity prior to July 1, 1973, and even more importantly, the absence of hotel threshold requirements at the time of construction would alleviate the requirements of the developer to include under DRI review any existing approved development activity for the purposes of determining regional impacts. L n.^,u t ? 7 sr?._tre requirements. A recent telephone conversation between Mr. David Gildersleeve of my staff, and Mr. Larry Slaybach of the Department of Community Affairs confirmed.this matter through consultation with your legal counsel. When the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act was enacted in 1972, hotel facilities were not identified as an applicable development type subject to review under the Development of Regional Impact process. More specifically, hotels were not considered to have "a substantial effect upon the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of more than one county," hence excluded from the established DRI threshold Subsequent to October, 1985, and following the construction of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort, hotels were included under applicable residential thresholds as outlined in the Guidelines and Standards of Chapter 27F-2 FAC and are now subject to review under the DRI process. On September 27, 1987, a transportation methodology meeting was held in the offices of TBRPC's legal counsel with regard to this project. Further, on September, 23, 1987, a DRI preapplication Wade-Trim Mr. Tom Beck ' October 1, 1987 Page 3 meeting was held with staff of the City of Clearwater to solicit input from the City into the DRI, Application for Development ' Approval (ADA) preparation and review processes. The Department of Community Affairs' concurrence is requested with respect to exclusion of the existing facility from the DRI - ADA for the ' proposed expansion based on the fact that no Hotel threshold existed until-1985, long after the existing facility was constructed. Because the applicant intends to file the ADA during November, 1987, a prompt response would be appreciated. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. ' Sincerely, WADE-TR William A. Ockunzzi Vice President r. Ira 'WA WAO:ps SSKR2:3 ZZZ2067-01 cc: Ms. Paula Harvey Ms. Suzanne Cooper Ms. Pat Alsup Mr. Russ Kimball Wade-Trim I ¦\-/00 f) EJL4S Cr FLORIDA o )) a o CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 460 3971 PA cE uJ b. BAH ...._- ?`I 1 0110, 1? 42 P73 . CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE AND REALTY TRUST a Massachusetts business trust having its principal office a: One Boston Place, Boston, Massachusetts (the Mortgagee) BUILDING LOAN MORTGAGE Date: ?Fcrn+ br°? Z i / S 7 Mortgagor: Key Inn, Inc. ' Address: c/o Richards Nodine Gilkey, Fite, Meyer & Thompson Richards Building ' 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 Mortgage Amount: $8,000,000 ;12,000.00 in State Documentary Stamps have been affixed to oriZinal mote and cancelled. RETURQ V> D Intangible Tax Paid Amount ; I/ Gin c? GUA°ANTEE ABSTRACT CO. HarotQ Mul(?ndore, Clerk Circuit court / Deputy Clerk. JJJ •• ?uu (1<r11lDLS ?A-1 SITE PLAN A OETAI.S A-2 GROUND FLOOR PLAN A-) YIPSI FLOOR PLAN A DOOR SCHEDULE A-L SECOMU L TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN A-$ IEI-lTN FLOOR PLAN L TYPICAL :VEST ROOMS A-4 SAY LOUHGE.ROOF PLAN A PUBLIC TOILET DETAILS A-) ELEVATIONS A-4 EMMONS A-9 GENERAL SECTIONS A-10 6WRAL SECTIONS A-11 "GENIC 409h-COAE DETAILS A-12 FIRST FLOOR-CORE DETAILS A-12 TYPICAL FLOOR-CORE DETAILS 1 TYPICAL STAIRS A-14 SKY LOULIGE DETAILS A-15 MALL SECTIONS-ASS(Vjtl dUILO1No A-I6 IALL SECTIONS-ASSfMitY 31010ING A-11 MALI SECTIONS-RI SIDENIIAL VOIt01YG S-1 FOUNDATION L GROUND FLOOR P;AN S-2 FIRST FLOOR FRAYING PLAN S-) SECOND FLOOR FRAYING PLAN S-A THIRD THRU SEVENTH FLOOR FRAYING PLAIIS S-S EI:NTH FLOOR FRAYING PLAN 1-6 ROOF FRAYING PLAN S-T POOF LOUNGE-FRAMIIIG PLANS S-A FOUNDATION SECTIONS S-9 FOUNDATION DETAILS S-10 WE SECTIONS-ONE STJRY RING i-11 SECTIONS A MISCELLAIIEOUS GEIAILS -12 DINING NOON-COCKIAIL LOUNGE ILL.! S-13 CORE SLAGS-RfINFORCIN: DETAILS .HA Stith SECTIONS UYIF MODULE-FRAMING PLANS S IG U'-IF MODULE-SfCTIGNS A DETAILS YF;.I ( SITE PLAN lll(CT.ICAI A MEi-aNI AU E-I ` FINE ALAPY A T(LEPHONE RISEN L SYNIOL LIST LiLECIAICALI E-2 CROUNG FLOOP PLAT: IELuTRA.L,, E-2 ?FIRSI FLOOR PLAN IEL(CLLI AL, C_L FIRST FLOOR PLAN PUOtl( &-:A' ,ELECIhI CAL) (_S KITCHEN PLAN - POAie L .i.lh 1. A,, KITCHEN PANEL SCHEDULI, A WAILS (fL(CIRICALF E-1 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN Si CON I. il:Ml+ FLOORS %ELECTRICALS E-d ROOF LOUNGE L MACHINE -.)Or 'LA, IELECTRICALI E-2 PROF PLAN LEIfCTRI:LII E-10 POSER RISER OIAGRAY t PAA- S(•ttHLAS (EL(LTVICAL) Y-1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN (MECHANICAL) Y-2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN (MECHANICAL) M-2 FIRST FLOOk PART PLAN (MECHANICAL) 11-1 TYPICAL FLOOR A FIRST FLOOR ROOF PLAN (MECHANICAL) M-S EIGNIN FLOOR K IVPILAL TOILET ROOM PLANS (MECHANICAL) M-6 ROOF L PART GkOUNU FLOOR PLAN (MECHANI CAL) M-T LOUNGE FLOOR PLAN IN(CHANICAL) M-1 KITCHEN PLAN H'lu+.HIMGI RTUILM M-9 RISEA UTA..RAVS A RETAILS (MECHANICAL) cm at U-10 . RISER 014""S 6 TAMES (MECHANICAL) M-11 SCN(IAILES A DE LA.LS LMECHAkICA(I 9-1: RISE) OIA,IIANS 6 DETAILS (MECHANICAL) Ar 1. V-12 PART PLAN-11RSt FLOOR (HIECNAAICAL) ork J 1 BTJ q I C O. ;ATUO(i afAMTER am '1#41 A t 1 61J• ?..,,rw V 1"` R? INL( ur' 1ST dA C tr., .. A+,,` MA Plate it 4 1 «P.. • t'-4.1-73 Ammom f M ».? o' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I''-=' DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 0PLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SHERATON SAID KEY RESORT FOR GRAND COULOIR CORPORATION PREPARED BY:( ;"1,lv,llN3 cprt,,r?l? ° Wade-Trim Engineering Landscape Architecture ?I po Planning Environmental Sciences 201 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 0 0 Wade-Trim November 12, 1987 Ms. Suzanne Cooper, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard Suite 219 417 : ?. St. Petersburg, FL 33702 .?? SUBJECT: DRI #179 Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Ms. Cooper: On behalf of Grand Couloir Corporation, Wade-Trim, Inc., is Group pleased to submit this Development of Regional Impact Application Services: for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort in Clearwater, Florida. Engineering Planning A total of 31 copies have been delivered to all individuals on Sciences the DRI application transmittal list. If additional copies are Landscape required, or any supplemental Architecture Y emental information needed, please don't hesitate to contact me or Ms. Bonnie Prinse of our staff. Sincerely, W RIM NC 1fa nzz' Executive Vice Presid cc: T. Gene Prescott k a !rY P°tY 'C^ Gerard N. von Dohl en, Esquire Russ Kimball Jack Dronzek ikl, FA BAY Bob Kay, Esquire REGIONAL PL,hPiNiidG COUNCIC Timothy Johnson, Esquire Pat Alsup BJP1:37 ZZZ2067.01 Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard ¦ Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Member of the Wade-Trim Group 813-221-2090 ¦ telecopier 813-229-0974 I ! SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Prepared For: Grand Couloir Corporation 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Wade-Trim Applicant/Developer: Grand Couloir Corporation 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Civil Engineer/Planners Wade-Trim, Inc. Environmental Consultant: 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Legal Counsel: Mr. Tim Johnson, Esquire Johnson, Blakley, et al 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 34616 Architects: Nathan, Evans, Pounders, Taylor Memphis, Tennessee Landscape Architects: Edward D. Stone, Jr. & Associates Orlando, Florida SSK1:29 1 m?^?® YILI Wade-Trim L 7 211111-ice DRI APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL LIST Ms. Suzanne T. Cooper, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Mr. Richard Adair Florida Department of Transportation 4950 West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 500 Tampa, Florida 33609 Ms. Terry Porter, DRI Coordinator Mr. Louis Fernandez Department of Environmental Regulation 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33610 Mr. George Percy, State Historic Pres. Officer Chief, Bureau of Historic Preservation Division of Historic Resources Department of State, The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Mr. Mike Allen Office of Environmental Services Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission 620 South Meridian Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Mr. Clark Hull, Sr. Env. Scientist Resource Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 33512-9712 Mr. Bill Howell Bureau of Biological & Interpretive Services Department of Natural Resources 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Room 508 Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Mr. Dennis Harmon, Chief Bureau of Economic Analysis Florida Department of Commerce 406 Fletcher Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-8132 10 Copies ADA 1 Copy ADA 2 Copies ADA Response to Question 19-A of ADA Legal Description 1 Copy ADA 5 Copies ADA 2 Copies ADA 1 Copy ADA mp"" Wade-Trim e?? Mr. Tom Beck, Chief Department of Community Affairs Division of Local Resource Management Rhyne Building 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399 1 Copy ADA Mr. A. J. Salem Planning Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 4970 - Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 1 Copy ADA Mr. Connor Davis Marine Fisheries Commission 2562 Executive Center Circle, E., Suite 211 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 1 Copy ADA Mr. Gene Heath, General Manager West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority 2535 Landmark Drive, Suite 211 Clearwater, Florida 33519 1 Copy ADA Mr. William Saalman, III U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 5118 North 56th Street, Suite 250 Tampa, Florida 33610 1 Copy ADA Mr. Jim Muller Florida Natural Areas Inventory 254 East Sixth Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32303 1 Copy ADA Mr. Wilbur Barnes Executive Director Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority 14840 49th Street North Clearwater, Florida 33520 1 Copy ADA Hr. Hugh Pascoe Pinellas Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization 440 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 1 Copy ADA SSK1:29 ar"IRM C ? I Wade-Trim . SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 380.06(6) FLORIDA STATUTES TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION S) SUBJECT PAGE NO. List of Exhibits iii List of Tables iv Part I. Application Information 1-2 Statement of Intent 1-1 3-5 Applicant Information 1-2 6-8 Development Information 1-3 8-9 Permit Information 1-3 Part II. General Information 11 MapsA - J A. General Location Map B. Aerial Photograph C. Topography Map D. Land Use Map E. Soils Map F. Vegetation Associations Map G. Master Drainage Plan (not relevant to this project) H. Master Development Plan I. Service Areas Map J. Existing Highway and Transport ation Network (not relevant to this project) 12 General Project Description 12-1 13 Environment and Natural Resources: Air 13-1 14 Environment and Natural Resources: Land 14-1 15 Environment and Natural Resources: Water 15-1 16 Environment and Natural Resources: Wetlands 16-1 (Deleted from Review) 17 Environment and Natural Resources: Flood Plains 17-1 18 Environment and Natural Resources: Vegetation 18-1 and Wildlife 19 Environment and Natural Resources: Historical 19-1 and Archaeological Sites 20 Economy: Employment and Economic Characteristics 20-1 21 Public Facilities: Wastewater Man agement 21-1 22 Public Facilities: Drainage 22-1 1 /_\I?1 Wade-Trim Sf= & 9 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 SECTION S) 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B SSK1:29 SUBJECT PAGE NO. Public Facilities: Water Supply 23-1 Public Facilities: Solid Waste 24-1 Public Facilities: Energy 25-1 Public Facilities: Education (Deleted from review) 26-1 Public Facilities: Recreation and Open Space 27-1 Public Facilities: Health Care 28-1 Public Facilities: Police 29-1 Public Facilities: Fire 30-1 Public Transportatio n Facilities: Transportation 31-1 Considerations Housing: Provisions of Residential Units 32-1 (Deleted from review)) A-1 B-1 3ftP^m® Y_\IA 9 Wade-Trim ?l?rit7 ii LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 7-1 Letter from Dept. of Community Affairs 7-1 17-1 Letter from the City of Clearwater 17-3 19-1 Letter from Division of Historical Resources 19-2 21-1 Letter to the City of Clearwater 21-4 23-1 Letter to the City of Clearwater 23-4 24-1 Letter to the City of Clearwater 24-3 25-1 Letter to Florida Power Corporation 25-3 25-2 Letter to City of Clearwater 25-4 28-1 Letter from Emergency Medical Services 28-2 29-1 Letter to,City of Clearwater Police Department 29-2 30-1 Letter from City of Clearwater Fire Department 30-2 31-1 Existing Roadway Network 31-2 31-2 Existing P.M. Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 31-4 & 5 31-3 Existing Intersection P.M. Peak Hour Levels of Service 31-9 31-4 Letter from Pinellas County 31-11 31-5 1997 Background Traffic 31-13 31-6 1997 Project Trip Distribution 31-16 31-7 1997 P.M. Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 31-18-20 31-8 1997 Intersection P.M. Peak Hour 31-23 Levels of Service ^ ?s aa Wade Trim LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 20-1 Construction Expenditures and Employment 20-2 21-1 Estimated Average Daily Wastewater Flows 21-3 22-1 Total Drainage Area in Acres 22-1 23-1 Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands 23-3 24-1 Estimated Average Daily Solid Waste Generation 24-2 25-1 Estimated Average Daily Electrical Energy Construction 25-1 31-1 Roadway Link Analysis - Existing Conditions 31-6 31-2A Roadway Link Analysis - Year 1997 Conditions with 100% Occupancy 31-21 31-2B Roadway Link Analysis - Year 1997 Conditions with 73% Occupancy 31-22 31-2C Roadway Link Analysis - Year 1997 Occupancy Conditions Summary 31-23 31-3 Intersection Analysis 31-24 SSK1:30 iv Mr-URN Wade-Trim [ ? 7 O H Eno C !L1 z F? O I=I MCI STATE OF FLORIDA ¦ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF LOCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT 2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 380.06(6), FLORIDA STATUTES. DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Application for Development Approval Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion PART I. APPLICANT INFORMATION I, C. Pat Alsup, the undersigned authorized agent of Grand Couloir Corporation, hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 22F-2.07, Florida Administrative Code. In support thereof I submit the following information concerning the Sheraton Sand Key Resort which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. November 12, 1987 Date C. Pat A sup Grand Couloir Corporation 2. APPLICANT: Grand Couloir Corporation 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 (813)595-1611 1-1 ??^em /_\I\1 Wade-Trim OINWA \?do 3. AUTHORIZED AGENT: 1 C. Pat Alsup Grand Couloir Corporation 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 (813)595-1611 William A. Ockunzzi, Vice President Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., #334 Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 221-2090 4. ATTACH THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PERSONS HAVING FEE SIMPLE OR LESSER ESTATE IN THE SITE. Sand Key Investment Program I, Ltd. a Florida Limited Partnership Ms. Roberta Dennis, Vice President 7820 38th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33710 5. ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. INCLUDE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE. The Northerly 408.21 feet of Parcel D (also known as Site V, Sand Key) being a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: For a point of reference commence at the Section corner common to Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20 of said Township and Range, as now established as having the coordinates (based on-the Pinellas County Grid System) of North 16500.72, East 31452.98; thence run N89°10'31"E, along the Section line dividing said Sections 17 and 20, a distance of 843.47 feet to an intersection with the center- line of Gulf Boulevard (State Road No. 208) as now established as a 100 foot right of way; thence S42 13'31"W along said centerline a distance of 263.93 feet to a.point; thence N47 46'29"W, a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwesterly right of way line of said Gulf Boulevard; thence run N42°13'31"E, along said Northwest- erly right of way line, a distance of 241.79 feet for the point of Beginning; thence continue N42 13'31"E along said right of way a distance of 408.21 feet; thence run N47 46'29"W, a distance of (776.5 feet more or less deed) (1391 feet more or less field) to the mean high water 1-ine (elevation 1.2 feet N.G.V.D. dated - 9/23/87), of the Gulf.of Mexico; thence run Southerly along said mean high water lin8 a distance of 475 feet more or less to a point that lies N47 46'29"W, and 1149 feet Tore or less distant from the Point of Beginning; thence run S47 46'29"E,..a distance of 1149 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning, containing 11.9588 acres more or less. 1-2 Wade-Trim 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AND SIZE. '- As defined by the Florida Administrative Code, Section 27F-2.026, the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion is presently classified as a Hotel Development project. The Sheraton Sand Key's existing 390-room facility will be undergoing expansion with the addition of 750 suites and support amenities. The scope of the project will include two new all suite towers, conference rooms, retail areas, restaurants, lounges, in-door and outdoor pools, health club, and housekeeping space. The expanded development encompasses 11.96 acres on Sand Key. 1 7. HAVE YOU REQUESTED A DRI BINDING LETTER OF INTERPRETATION OR VESTED RIGHTS DETERMINATION FROM THE DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06(4), FLORIDA STATUTES? No. Please refer to Exhibit 7-1, Mr. J. Thomas Beck's letter to Mr. William Ockunzzi dated November 2, 1987. ¦ 8. LIST ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. The City of Clearwater 9. LIST ALL AGENCIES (LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL) FROM WHICH APPROVAL AND/OR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE THE PERMIT OR APPROVAL FOR EACH AGENCY. The City of Clearwater - Site Plan Approval - Building Permits - Utility Connections (Approval) Development Order Approval Department of Natural Resources - Construction permit for activities seaward of coastal construction control line Southwest Florida Water Management District - Stormwater management permit - Surface water management permit (SSK1-2) 1-3 m?^?s /.' 1\1 Wade-Trim C ] ?? .CVO NE tw `' STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST * TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 BOB MARTINEZ THOMAS G. PELHAM November 2, 1987 c?.n« SfmfMa?y Mr. William A. Ockunzzi Wade-Trim, Incorporated 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Ste. 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Re: Sheraton Sand Key Resort Dear Mr. Ockunzzi: It is the Department's understanding that the Sheraton Sand Key Resort, located in Clearwater, is seeking to renovate and expand facilities on an existing 11.96 acre tract on Sand Key Is- land. This correspondence is in response to your letter of Octo- ber 1, 1987, which requests the Department's concurrence in ex- cluding the renovation of existing facilities from those Develop- ment of Regional Impact (DRI) review requirements that the re- mainder of the project must undergo. Based on information supplied by you, the existing facili- ties comprise a single structure consisting of 390 guest ooms, restaurants, shops and various ancillary activity rooms/areas. The Master Site Plan and Construction Plans for these existing facilities were submitted to the local governing body on ;Tune 20, 1973, and appear to have been approved by that body on August 17, 1973. Proposed expansion plans envision the addition of two towers totaling 750 suites, conference rooms, retail space., day care facility, restaurants, and accompanying ancillary areas/uses. It is our understanding that current plans call for the construction of a new 428 unit hotel tower, renovation of the existing hotel structure, and subsequent construction of a second tower comprising 322 suites and associated amenities. A ten-year buildout period is expected. You were correct in noting that the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act of 1972 did not specifically ident- ify hotel facilities as Developments of Regional Impact. Rules EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 7-1 EXHIBIT 7°1 I'. Mr. William A. Ockunzzi November 2, 1987 Page Two pertaining to hotels were not immediately promulgated subsequent to the Act's original passage. However, the Department did esta- blish a policy in April, 1983, through the issuance of a binding letter, that included hotels under the DRI residential guidelines and standards. Recent revisions to Chapter 380, Florida statutes (F.S.), which took effect October 1, 1985, clearly established Hotel/Motel DRI thresholds. Therefore, based on the information as we understand it, the ' Department concurs that the existing 390-unit Sheraton Sand Key Resort development appears to predate the DRI hotel/motel thres- hold requirements as set forth in Section 380.06, F.S. (1985), and Chapter 27F-2, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Consequently, the proposed renovation of the-existing 390--unit, 8-story hotel tower appears to be exempt from the DRI/ADA review requirements of Section 380.06, F.S.; provided however, that (1) no development, as defined in 380.04, F.S., has occurred at the Sheraton Sand Key Resort under local government approval subsequent to April, 1983, and (2) that the proposed renovation will not constitute "development" as defined under Section 380.04, F.S. In light of this, the Department requests that relevant details of the proposed renovation to the existing tower be ' appropriately described in the DRI Application for Development Approval. You should also be aware that, in the absence of a binding letter, this agency reserves the right to determine that Chapter 380, F.S., is applicable to your project. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact Larry Slayback in the Bureau of State Planning at (904) 488-4925. Sincerely, 1 Thomas Beck Chief, Bureau of State.Planning TB/lsh cc: Ms. Suzanne Cooper (TBRPC) Mr. Chris Papandreas.(City of Clearwater) 7-2 4 O N H V W A rF=4 V W O A Z a r i 0 0.25 0.5 1 SCALE IN MILES °a DREW ST. CLEVELAND ST. CHESTNUT ST. PROJECT SITE ti C2 OcT cc C7 = W •.'! BELLEAIR , t d W. SAY DR. CSWY. .1 % ULMERTON RD. 40 G m J z W _ < O Q ? W ALSINGHAM RD, y a z J S C7 S BELLEAIR RD. E. BAY DR. GULF-TO-BAY BLVD.-- SHERATON MAP SAND -KEY RESORT GENERAL LOCATION Wade-Trim A Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sciences SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT MAP B AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH MAP SOURCE: HAMRICK AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. S1/2 18-29-15 DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: NOVEMBER 1984 r"`¦ Wade-Trim Engineering Landscape Architecture. • •Plannin Environmental Science 201 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 33.4 Tampa, FL 33602 r? r rr : r =map= r r r rr r rr r?? rr V14 EL 15 0 500 1000 2000 V14 V14 EL 14 EL 14 V14 EL 12 EL 15 V14 All Gulf EL 13 EL 12 of All Mexico EL 11 PROJECT SITE V14 tea. EL 15 Clearwater d Harbor LEGEND At - A30 Zone of 100-Yr, flood ; base flood elevations & flood hazard factors determined. V14 ` EL 13 ' A11 V1 - V30 Zone of 100-Yr, coastal flood with velocity ; EL 11 base flood elevations & flood hazard factors not determined. EL 99 Base Flood Elevation All EL 12 SHERATON MAP SAND KEY RESORT FLOOD PLAINS Wade-Trim Cj Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sciences r r N 0 500 1000 2000 181 :. . . :; 322 :.:.. 540 ''. Clearwater ` ,;•`.'': Harbor 710 LEGEND 34 133 - Multiple Dwelling Units - Low Rise ` 134 - Multiple Dwelling Units - High Rise 3 181 - Swimming Beaches .? '. 185 - Parks 540 - Bays & Estuaries 710 - Beaches - Other than Swimming " • ; 322 - Coastal Scrub 11.96 Ac. SHERATON MAP SAND KEY RESORT LAND USE Wade-Trim & VEGETATION D&F Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Scienpa ..n= Sim m r t r t N 0 0.25 0.5 1 4 &L SCALE IN MILES m cs?y q?q( r PROJECT SITE 0. y IL,. r BELLEAIR W, BAY DR. CSW Y.:?' .. QO, N 0 WALSINGHAM RD. • DREW ST, CLEVELAND ST. CHESTNUT ST. O c-C O 0 J x H cc I < W ULMERTON RD. C Cr W L7 O s 0 z J d BELLEAIR RD. M 0 N co a E. BAY DR. GULF-TO-BAY BLVD.-_ LEGEND O WATER TREATMENT PLANT SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT POLICE STATION FIRE STATION ® HOSPITAL G J rD J z 2 W N SHERATON MAP. SAND KEY RESORT SERVICE AREAS Wade-Trim ' Engineering Landscape Architecture ??lT Planning Environmental.Sclences 1 12. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. REFERRING TO MAP H DESCRIBE AND DISCUSS IN GENERAL TERMS ALL MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN ITS COMPLETE FORM. The existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort has been in operation at this location since 1975 and has grown throughout the years as a premiere resort on Clearwater Beach. The expansion presently planned for is to be located on an 11.96 acre parcel of land due south of the existing hotel facility. The expansion plan is a natural progression from years of continued growth and is considered a viable solution to satisfy the area's growing demand and need for additional resort facilities. The proposed addition includes a major central building component and surrounding support and recreational amenities. As depicted on Map H, the hotel addition will incorporate 750 all-suite hotel rooms in two high-rise towers and will add a total of approximately 1050 new parking spaces ' (garage and ground level). Low rise building areas designed around the towers will include a 50-75 seat-lobby bar, 250 seat entertainment lounge, 250-300 seat cafe, 80-100 seat restaurant, 150 seat bar/lounge, retail space, health spa, day care center, indoor pool, ballroom/meeting rooms, administrative/registration area, exhibit hall, rest room facilities and general lobby area. The outside recreation facilities will include an outdoor pool, pool bar, terrace area, and various other recreational amenities. Construction is scheduled to start in the Spring of 1988 with completion planned for late 1989, open for business for the 89-90 winter season. B. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES ON THE SITE FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. USE LEVEL II OF THE FLORIDA LAND USE AND COVER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM: A TEC I R P R I E R M I N P NNING COUNCIL. REFER TO MAPS D (EXISTING LAND USE) AND H (MASTER PLAN). USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND TREAT EACH LAND USE CATEGORY AS MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. The 11.96 acre site is currently vacant property and includes beachfront land on the Gulf of Mexico. Much of Sand Key has been altered over the years by man and contains little ?, vegetation of noteworthy value within the interior portions of the site (please see Section 18, Vegetation and Wildlife). The property has been cleared and contains scrub grasses, isolated sea oat strands (which will be the focus of a re-nourishment and re-vegetation program described in Question 12.C). 12-1 11.E I\a Wade-Trim C ? ] A dE 7??I? I I Current land use for the parcel of property planned for development is classified as Coastal Scrub, Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Class Definition 322). The development, upon completion, will incorporate several elements of change in land use, all of which are considered as Tourist Services, FLUCCS Code Number 145. C. PROVIDE A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF THE SITE PLANNING APPROACH TO BE UTILIZED FOR THIS PROJECT. INCLUDE AS PART OF THE DISCUSSION CONSIDERATIONS OF UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER FEATURES INVOLVED IN THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS. Sand Key, a developed barrier island in Clearwater, Florida, has provided the Sheraton Sand Key Resort with natural geographic amenities. The site is accessible by motor vehicle from the north (through Clearwater/Sand Key Bridge) and south (from the southern Pinellas Beaches). Tourists have utilized the existing facility as a vacation resort and a variety of private, public, and semi-public organizations have utilized the hotel convention and conference center facilities since 1975. I 1- ILIRPIRTA 7 The existing and proposed land uses are consistent with the City of Clearwater's adopted comprehensive plan and zoning regulations as well as the established character of develop- ment along the barrier islands. The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the site as "Commercial Tourist Facility." Adjacent existing uses include a vacant parcel and high density residential to the south, the existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort to the north, and vacant underdeveloped lands to the east along Clearwater Harbor, and the Gulf of Mexico to the west. The site of the.proposed Sheraton Sand Key Resort expansion was the subject of recent litigation whereby ownership of accreted lands was established by a decision of the Florida Supreme Court. The Florida Supreme Court held that the owner of the upland property owns all of the accreted lands adjacent to its property. Therefore, the development proposal for the expansion utilizes densities available through accreted lands adjacent to the existing resort site and the proposed expansion site. The Resort expansion is proposed to be developed over a 10-year build out period. Initial development activity will include the construction of a 428 suite tower and associated amenities followed by the renovation of the existing Sheraton Sand Key facilities. The second tower will be initiated after the completion of the first tower and the renovation of the existing hotel. The second tower shall include 322 hotel units or an equivalent number of residential units as measured by Traffic Impact. 12-2 Wade-Trim I i w r Ar"M ?. ? isv ,q\?? ®\r0? With regard to environmental constraints and land use considerations, the proposed resort expansion is essentially a continuation of existing land uses. The beachfront will be the focus of a sea oat re-vegetation program which will include a sand dune system and pedestrian walkway for beach access. Specifically, the proposed expansion is consistent with the following elements: - Comprehensive Plan. - Adjacent land use and zoning. - Access and traffic/parking capabilities. - Sewer, water and utility provisions. - Hurricane evacuation and protection can be effectively implemented. - No cultural, archaeological or historic resources will be impacted. (SSK1-3) 12-3 Wade-Trim I I 1 i 1 i W u 0 W 014 H z A z H z w z 0 x z w 13. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: AIR A. ESTIMATE AVERAGE DAILY EMISSIONS IN POUNDS PER DAY BY TYPE AND SOURCE. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project are anticipated to be transportation generated pollutants resulting from the increase in vehicular traffic. Air quality modeling will be conducted as requested by FDER and Pinellas County. The modeling will be undertaken following completion and finalization of traffic studies and will be submitted for review during sufficiency. The air quality modeling will be conducted using approved EPA models and in accordance with FDER and Pinellas County specifications. B. WILL A COMPLEX SOURCE PERMIT BE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 17-2.04, RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION? The requirement for a complex source permit was repealed on August 16, 1981. C. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO REDUCE EMISSIONS AND TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE EFFECTS? Minimal air emissions will be generated by construction activities. These missions will result from fugitive dusts, wind erosion and construction equipment exhaust. There will be minor clearing of vegetative material and consequently little or no burning of cleared vegetation. Appropriate watering procedures will be employed to control fugitive dusts. If significant transportation related air quality impacts are identified by the air quality modeling, mitigative measures will be addressed in sufficiency. s_ ?J ' she-Ads SSK1-28 13-1 Wade-Trim 14. ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES: LAND A. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF EACH OF THE SOILS INDICATED ON MAP E. A. (1) EXPAND THE SOIL DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION TABLE TO INCLUDE THE DEGREE AND KIND OF SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED USES. REFER TO THE FLORIDA GENERAL SOILS ATLAS FOR REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICTS VII AND VIII. The most recent soil survey of Pinellas County was published in 1972 by the USDA Soil Conservation Service. . As presented in Map E, soils present on the project site include coastal beaches and made land. Coastal beaches consist of narrow strips of tide-washed sand bordering islands and parts of the mainland. The beach sand is light gray to white consisting primarily of fine quartz particles with varying quantities of medium to coarse shell fragments. The beach sands have been deposited and reworked by waves. The depth to the water table for this soil type is tidally influenced and consequently fluctuates with the tide. Permeability is very rapid (>20 in/hr) and the available water capacity is low (<0.05 in/in of soil). Soil limitations for most types of development are severe for this association due to tidal flooding. Made land consists of mixed sand, clay, hard rock, shells and shell fragments that have been transported and mechanically leveled and reworked to provide locations for development. Made land may be underlain at a depth of 2 to 8 ft. by various materials such as sandy bay bottom, solid rubble, chunks of concrete or broken asphalt. Limitations to development are not designated due to varying properties of the soil materials. 1 7 .1 MCI C As referenced in Section 12C approximately 8 acres of coastal beach has accreted onto the Sheraton Beach. Historical surveys of the mean high water line (mhwl) conducted by George F. Young and Associates at the Sheraton beach indicate the mhwl has moved waterward approximately 606 ft. during the period 12-27-72 to 9-19-87. Within the last four years (surveys dated 9-13-83 and 9-19-87), the beach has advanced approximately 175'. Exhibit 14-1 illustrates the advancement of the mhwl over the past 15 years. Due to the present and ongoing beach dynamics, it is anticipated the beach will continue to advance in this area. 14-1 Wade-Trim r B. WHERE THE DEGREE OF LIMITATIONS ARE VERY SEVERE, SEVERE OR MODERATE FOR A PARTICULAR SOIL, DISCUSS HOW EACH OF THESE LIMITATIONS WILL BE OVERCOME, AND WHAT SITE ALTERATIONS WILL BE NECESSARY BOTH FOR THE PRESENT DEVELOPER AND ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPERS OR OWNERS. The made land and coastal beach sediments underlying the expansion area present no unusual limitations for development. Standard engineering practices and foundation preparation procedures will be successfully utilized on the expansion site as they have on adjacent development sites. C. IS THE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN AN AREA OF KNOWN MINERAL DEPOSITS? IF SO, SPECIFY. WILL EXTRACTION OF ANY MINERAL RESOURCES OCCUR ON-SITE, EVEN THOUGH ANCILLARY TO THE OPERATION OF THE PROJECT? There are no commercially viable mineral deposits or resources on the site. D. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT TO PREVENT OR CONTROL WIND AND WATER SOIL EROSION? INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PLANS FOR CLEARING AND GRADING AS RELATED TO EROSION CONTROL. No significant clearing or grading of soils is proposed. Furthermore, due to the rapid permeability rate of the soils ' water erosion will not present a problem. Wind erosion control will be accomplished through watering of the soils and sodding.if necessary. E. DESCRIBE ANY UNIQUE GEOLOGIC FEATURES OF THE SITE, AND DISCUSS WHAT ASPECTS OF THE SITE PLAN WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR . OR TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM. No unique geologic features are present on the site. SSK1-32 14-2 Wade-Trim C ? ] win ?r M r7 WM ? M"? "M =* I m m " w up so walh w " Now" mom 0 N O O O A GULF BLVD. MML Lp ? BEACH ACCRETION a ? RECORDS SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT Trim kellw Wade- Engineering Landscape Architecture gdo Planning Environmental Sciences I I 15. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WATER A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS (GROUND AND SURFACE WATER) ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE, INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION AND DISCUSSION OF ANY POTENTIAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. Groundwater Groundwater levels at the project site are influenced by tidal action in the Gulf of Mexico. Elevations of the surficial aquifer fluctuate regularly with periodic inundation. Because the site is located on a barrier island abutting the Gulf, both the surficial and the confined Floridan Aquifer contain high concentrations of chlorides and other dissolved solids (>1000 mg/l chlorides; >180 mg/l total hardness; >180 mg/l noncarbon- ate hardness; >250 mg/l sulfate). The Floridan Aquifer is located at approximately 100 ft. below mean sea level in this area. No recharge to the Floridan Aquifer occurs in this portion of Pinellas County (Fernald and Patton, 1984). Surface Water Sand Key is bordered by the Gulf on it's western perimeter and Clearwater Harbor on it's eastern perimeter. All Pinellas County surface waters have been designated Outstanding Florida Waters. Additionally, these two water bodies are classified as Class III waters designated for recreation and fish and wildlife propagation (Chapter 17-3 F.A.C.). The project site is adjacent to the Gulf, however, the Gulf waters will not be impacted by the project as impervious surface will not be closer than 400 ft. from the existing mean high water line, and there will be no discharges to the Gulf. All stormwater will be treated pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. B. DESCRIBE IN TERMS OF APPROPRIATE WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS THE EXISTING GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE WHICH WILL BE INFLUENCED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. ?i Groundwater Quality As previously stated, groundwater in the project area is very high in chlorides and dissolved solids due to the influence of saline Gulf waters. In this portion of Pinellas County no potable water is contained in the Floridan Aquifer. Surface Water Quality The most recent study of water quality conditions in this area was conducted by the FDER Bureau of Water Quality.Management to aid in the development of Water Quality Based Effluent Limita- tions (WQBELs) for area wastewater effluent dischargers. The s.A C 7 a?_rs 15-1 Wade-Trim findings of this study are detailed in the Clearwater Harbor/ St. Joseph Sound Intensive Survey Documentation (Water Quality Technical Series Volume 1, Number 89, April 1987). Data obtained from this study for two monitoring stations is included in Appendix A. Data from these stations represent the most recent water quality data available for the Gulf and Clearwater Harbor. C. DESCRIBE THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT WILL BE UTILIZED TO MONITOR CHANGES IN THE QUALITY OF GROUND AND SURFACE WATER ANTICIPATED TO BE BROUGHT ABOUT AS A RESULT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE. Currently, no federal, state or local agency monitors water quality in the Gulf on a regular basis. A monitoring program is not proposed as there will be no impacts to water quality. 0. DESCRIBE THE MEASURES WHICH WILL BE USED TO MITIGATE (OR AVOID WHERE POSSIBLE) POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY. As previously stated no impacts to surface or groundwater quality is anticipated. All new impervious surfaces will comply with the stormwater management requirements of Chapter 40D(4) and 17-25, F.A.C., as discussed in Question 22. SSK1-6 1 15-2 7:1I\1 Wade-Trim C 7 1 16. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WETLANDS A. HOW MANY ACRES OF WETLANDS ARE FOUND ON THE SITE? FOR THESE PURPOSES, WETLANDS ARE DESCRIBED AS AREAS WHICH ARE SUBJECTED TO PERMANENT OR PROLONGED PERIODS OF INUNDATION OR SATURATION (WATER IS AT THE SOIL SURFACE AT LEAST TWO TO SEVEN MONTHS, SEVEN OUT OF TEN YEARS), AND/OR WHICH EXHIBIT VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND/OR SOIL TYPES CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS HYDROPERIOD. B. WHAT ALTERATIONS OR DISTURBANCES TO WETLANDS ARE PROPOSED? C. WHAT WETLAND AREAS WILL BE PRESERVED IN THEIR NATURAL OR EXISTING STATE? DESCRIBE THE PLANNING APPROACH THAT WILL BE UTILIZED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PRESERVATION. As approved at the October 26, 1987 TBRPC Pre-Application Conference, no response to Question 16 is required. SSK1-7 16-1 r_\IS"I Wade Trim I I 1 17. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: FLOOD PLAINS A. IS ANY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PRONE AREA AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION? IF SO, INDICATE WHETHER ALL FLOOR ELEVATIONS WILL BE ABOVE THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LEVEL, AND DISCUSS METHODS WHICH WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE POTENTIAL FLOOD HAZARDS. WHAT IS THE DEVELOPER'S SOURCE AND METHODOLOGY USED TO DERIVE FLOOD PRONE AREA INFORMATION? HAS THE DEVELOPER SOUGHT THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM COUNTIES, CITIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, ETC. (IN ADDITION TO, OR IN LIEU OF, THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY DATA), RELATIVE TO FLOOD PRONE AREAS. B* Areas subject to the 100-year flood have been determined for Sand Key by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The project site is located within zones All and V14 of the 100-year flood. Zone All includes areas of the 100-year flood with base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. Base flood elevations (bfe) of 11 ft. and 12 ft. have been determined for the Sheraton area. Zone V14 is an area of the 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action). Base flood elevations varying from 12 ft. - 15 ft. have been determined for these V-zones. FEMA Flood Rate Insurance Map Community Panel 12509 60014 B illustrates the 100-year flood zone of the project area. These zones are depicted on. Map C. Due to the unique nature of the site in that more than 8 acres of beach has accreted adjacent to the existing Sheraton property since 1972, the expansion project proposes to construct a portion of the first tower 105 ft. seaward of the existing coastal construction control line (CCCL). The CCCL is scheduled to be re-established in this area in 1988. However, currently a permit must be issued by the FDNR for any construction seaward of the existing CCCL. To compensate for potential flood hazards all FEMA and City of Clearwater engineering and construction specifications relevant to construction in the 100-year flood zone will be adhered to. All permanent structures will be constructed above the designated base food elevation. As proposed there will be approximately 550 ft. of beach between the mean high water line and the nearest structure. Within this beach area the natural dune system will be recreated. This dune system in conjunction with the wide beach will aid in protecting structures from storm surge. The Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Geological Survey were contacted concerning rel-ev4nt flood elevation data. These agencies confirmed the FEMA information as the best available information. 17-1 7:' !11116® Wade-Trim i B. DOES THE LOCAL JURISDICTION IN WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS .PROPOSED QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE? IF SO, ATTACH A LETTER OF VERIFICATION FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. The City of Clearwater participates in the National Flood Insurance Program. Included as Exhibit 17-1 is a letter of verification from the Chief of Permitting for the City of Clearwater. ? A7G.?dl SSK1-8 17-2 Wade-Trim i?L?ao Office of Building Director CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518-4748 November 9, 1987 Ms. Tammy S. Lyons Environmental Scientist Wade-Trim 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 Dear Ms. Lyons: The City of Clearwater is a participant in the Federal Flood Insurance Program. We have adopted the latest Federal Emergency Management Agency's regulations, with amendments, Chapter 146 City Code and Ordinances. The City is also enforcing Section 3901, The Coastal Construction Code, for the barrier islands of Pinellas County. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. ;Since ely, Victor C. Chodora, AIA Chief of Permits VCC:mmt EXHIBIT 17-1 17-3 "Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" 18. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE A. IDENTIFY THE DOMINANT SPECIES AND OTHER UNUSUAL OR UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS DELINEATED ON MAP F, AND SPECIFY THEIR ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION, HEALTH, AND CONDITIONS. The project site consists of disturbed coastal strand uplands. Remnants of a secondary dune system are evident along the seaward fringe of the site. The dominant plant species found on the site include the following: Scientific Name Uniola paniculata I omoea macranth-a I moea_ pes-caprae C a-Fi?maes, cue spp. Pas a istichum Croton punctatus Common Name sea oats beach morning glory. railroad vine sound dune spurge seashore paspalum beach tea B. ARE ANY RARE OR ENDANGERED PLANTS FOUND ON THE SITE? IF SO, WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THESE SPECIES? No rare or endangered plants are found on the site. All plant species present are common dune pioneer species common to this locale and habitat. C. WHAT WILDLIFE (INCLUDING AQUATIC LIFE) NEST, FEED, RESIDE ON OR MIGRATE TO THE SITE? WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THIS WILDLIFE AND THEIR HABITATS? The most notable wildlife species nesting in the coastal strand is the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). This species is discussed in detail below. Other species observed to be residing on the more landward vegetated portions of the site include mourning doves (Zenaidura macroura) and small rodents (Peromyscus spp.). T esse species are considered to be facultative transients on this site. The unvegetated portions of the site could potentially provide nesting habitat for many species of shorebirds (charadriiformes), including black skimmers (R ncho s___ ni er) and least terns (Sterna albifrons), however, iF-gfl?estrian traffic from surrounding a-T nd uses significantly reduces the probability of use for nesting by these species. ?s^ia VX 1\4 18-1 Wade-Trim 9 s\_gia u 1 1? D. ARE ANY OF THE WILDLIFE LISTED UNDER (C) ABOVE CONSIDERED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES? IF SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED STATEMENT ON WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND THEIR BREEDING, NESTING, AND FEEDING AREAS. The loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) is listed as threatened by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The U.S. loggerhead population is estimated at 25,000-50,000 with approximately 90% of the total population represented in Florida. The majority of Florida nesting activity occurs in the southeast portion of the state. (Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, FGFWFC, 1984). The Clearwater Marine Science Center (CMSC) report 1987 Loggerhead Sea Turtle Nesting Information indicates 15 nests and/or false crawls were reported on San Key beach during the 1987 nesting season. Sea turtles are protected at the federal level by the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The National Marine Fisheries Service has jurisdiction over sea turtles in the water while the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has jurisdiction over them on land. The Florida Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with federal agencies administers turtle programs throughout the state. The principle threats to sea turtle survival include the following 1) nesting beach alterations (erosion, development where nesting would normally occur) 2) predation by domestic and feral animals, and 3) disorientation of hatchlings by artificial lighting resulting in hatchling mortalities. As indicated in the FDNR report Florida Sea Turtle Nesting Activit 1979-1985, measures to aid in protecti o ea turn inc ude t e following: o increased public education and awareness; o regulations to control beach lighting during the nesting season; o elimination of heavy machinery (beach cleaning) on the beach during the nesting season; o better coastal planning to circumvent severe beach erosion; and o increased manpower to aid in predation control. i Pot\?A 18-2 Wade-Trim 9 a3h _= 1 In order to avoid potential adverse impacts to sea turtles the following measures will be incorporated into the Sheraton Sand Key expansion: o The Sheraton Sand Key will engage with the Clearwater Marine Science Center or other qualified agencies or individuals to survey the beach daily and mark with FDNR approved warning signs any sea turtle nests found on the Sheraton beach. This activity will begin May 1 and continue through the end of nesting season, November 1. o Mechanized beach cleaning will occur only after the daily nesting surveys. Cleaning equipment will avoid identified nests. o Dunes will be recreated and revegetated on the existing Sheraton property as well as the expansion property. FDNR personnel will be consulted concerning dune re-construction. Two dune walkovers will be incorporated into the dune system. This measure will serve to restore the natural dune system as well as concea V artificial lighting visible from the beach. o Dune walkover lighting will be footlights or appropriately shielded low frequency lighting. The site plan is being designed to minimize light visible to hatchlings. o Any construction requiring exterior lighting during the nesting season (May 1-November 1) will be limited to daylight hours. o The Sheraton currently displays and will continue to display sea turtle educational information. SSK1-9 1 18-3 lor^Ms 9, Wade-Trim IN 11V 19. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES A. ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE? The Department of State, Division of Archives, History and Records Management has been contacted to determine if any archaeological and/or historical sites have been described on the Sheraton Sand Key property. A verbal determination of the project site from this agency states that no known sites are recorded in the Master Site File. A letter has been received from the Division of Archives, History and Records Management and is enclosed as Exhibit 19-1. B. IF ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES WERE LISTED UNDER (A) ABOVE, PROVIDE A STATEMENT AS TO THE STEPS THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS, WHERE APPROPRIATE. If in fact archaeological resources are found during project construction, the applicant agrees to report such findings to determine their significance with the Division of Archives and the City of Clearwater. I SSK1-10 19-1 Wade-Trim ??..0 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Jim Smith Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES R.A. Gray Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 November 9, 1987 (9C4) 488-1480 In Reply Refer to: Beth J. LaCivita Historic Sites Specialist Ms. Tammy S. Lyons (904) 487-2333 Environmental Scientist Project File No.871518 Wade-Trim 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 RE: Your letter of October 27, 1987, Cultural Resource Assessment Request ADA/DRI for proposed addition to the Sheraton Sand Key Resorts, Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida Dear Ms. Lyons: In accordance with the provisions of the applicable local ordinance and/or Sections 253.77 , 267.061 , 380.06 A/, 380.061 and 403.918(2)(a)6- Florida , Statutes, and i-m-p-lementing state reg-uations, ans/or in accordance w-1-5 Tie - prolsions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665) as amended and related federal laws and their implementing procedures for federally involved projects , we have reviewed the above cited project(s) to determine its(their) effect on significant archaeological and historical sites and properties. A review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological and/or historical sites are recorded for or considered likely to be present within the project area(s), Because of the project(s) nature it is considered unlikely that any such sites will be affected . Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project(s) will-Tiave no effect on any sites listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of national, state or local significance. The projec (s) is are consistent also with Florida's coastal zone program and its historic preservation laws and concerns, and may proceed without further involvement with this agency. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please do not hestiate to contact us. Your interest and cooperation in helping to protect Florida's archaeological and historical resources are appreciated. Sincerely, GWP/efk George W. Percy, Director Enclosure( ) Division of Historical Resources and State Historic Preservation Officer 19-2 Archaeological Research Florida Folklife Programs Historic Preservation (904) 487-2299 (904) 397-2192 (904) 487-2333 EXHIBIT 19-1 O z 0 U W 20. ECONOMY: EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE. BREAK DOWN BY TYPE (LABOR, MATERIALS, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OVERHEAD, ETC.) AND ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THESE EXPENDITURES WILL BE SPENT WITHIN THE REGION. FOR LABOR, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF CONSTRUC- TION EMPLOYEES DURING EACH PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. The expenditures for this project reflect information generated by the owner/developer, local government officials, architects and building contractors. The areas addressed in this question are of economic nature and are general in scope. Construction costs may vary somewhat from item to item but overall configu- rations and bottom-line numbers are accurately portrayed for this project. Total cost projected for this development is $90,630,000. Included in these assumptions and calculations are the costs of land improvements, labor and materials, design and engineering, environmental consulting/testing and all contingency fees. Table 20.1 represents construction expenditures and employment figures. Categorical Expenditures o Construction labor: costs incurred for contract labor, including payroll costs, overhead and profit. o Materials: materials purchased for on-site development and construction. o Professional services: these include design fees for architects, engineer-s, environmental testing, accounting, legal and surveying. o Overhead: Developer administrative and financing costs, permit fees, equipment, etc. Employment Generated By Construction Expenditures Estimates of employment as a result of construction activity were prepared using the labor expenditure projection in Table 20-1 as was provided by the applicant. 20-1 Wade-Trim 1 Table 20-1. Construction Expenditures and Employment Sheraton Sand Key Resort TYPE OF IMPACT IMPACT-TAMPA BAY REGION Total Amount Percentage $ in Region in Region o Construction Expenditures A. Labor $28,174,000 $27,387,550 95% B. Materials 16,476,000 14,086,980 90% C. Professional Services 1,850,000 925,000 50% D. Overhead 44,130,000 44,130,000 100% TOTAL 0,6? 30,000 86,529,530 o Employment Projections A. Construction Employment 331 314 95% B. Employment Income (Labor) $28,829,000 $27,387,550 95% Source: Grand Couloir Corporat ion - 20-2 yes^?e !_;ISi Wade-Trim 2,91.,-?® \?drl - Expenditures in Region The breakdown of expenditures within the Tampa Bay region are reflected in Table 20-1 and are calculated on the following assumptions. , o Labor Expenditures (95% in Tampa Bay Region) - It is anticipate that most or all of the labor will come from local sources due to the fact a local contractor will be used for construction. o Materials (90% within Tampa Bay) - Materials purchased for construction purposes will be made on a local level using local contractors and laborers. There remains a possibility that some specialized materials may come from outside the ' region. o Professional Services (50% in Tampa Bay Region) - Approxi- mately fifty 50 percent of the professional services are anticipated to be drawn from the Tampa Bay region. o Overhead (100% within Tampa Bay region) - Any and all audit oval elements of the project considered as overhead are assumed to be assimilated within the immediate region. B. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROJECT THE NUMBER OF NON- CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYEES AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE, USING APPROPRIATE DIVISION AND TWO-DIGIT (I.E., MAJOR GROUP) STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATIONS (E.G., MINING--METAL MINING; RETAIL TRADE--FOOD STORES; SERVICES- -BUSINESS SERVICES; ETC.). INCLUDE ESTIMATED PAYROLL. IF THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WILL VARY SEASONALLY, SPECIFY. By the very nature of the hotel business, a variety of employment opportunities will be made available upon completion of the new facility. As projected by the developer, the ' following positions will be required to staff the hotel and support areas. Included are estimated income levels for each group. ' Seven divisions of staff have been identified by the owner and include the executive staff, rooms department, food and beverage, accounting sales and marketing, maintenance and pool i attendants, classified SIC code 70, Division I, Services). 20-3 !A!^ali Wade-Trim ?li?..di"i - 1 Normal Season Personnel Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over ' Executive 2 2 Rooms 97 32 5 2 Food & Beverage 102 93 10 2 Accounting 3 3 3 Telephone 5 Gift Shop 11 Sales/ Marketing 6 10 Maintenance 23 2 Pool 6 TOTAL 199 173 26 21 ' High Season Personnel Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over Executive 2 2 Rooms 120 38 6 2 Food & Beverage 151 126 11 2 Accounting 3 4 3 Telephone 6 Gift Shop 14 Sales/ Marketing 6 11 Maintenance 32 2 Pool 8 TOTAL 271. 227 29 2 C. FOR ALL TYPES OF EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, ALSO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. Construction Personnel Under $5,000 $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 91999 14,999 24,999 over HVAC ec anics 2 Bricklayers/ Blocklayers 28 Carpenters 35 Cement Masons 20 1 20-4 ?r^ars 7-.1ISi Wade-Trim i\?di Construction Personnel - Continued Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000- $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over Electricians 22 Elevator Constructors g Glaziers 12 Ironworkers 20 Laborers 22 Lathers 12 Painters 16 Plasterers 16 Plumbers/ Pipefitters 14 Roofers 18 Sheet Metal Workers 16 Soft Floor Layers 14 Sprinkler Fitters g Tile Setters 12 Welders 4 TOTAL 7_2 _2T1_ 16 Power Equipment Operators Backhoe Bulldozer Compactor Crane Grader Piledriver 2 2 2 2 2 2 TOTAL 77 0. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INDICATE WHETHER NON-CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT IN THE PROJECT REQUIRES SPECIALIZED SKILLS OR TRAINING. WILL ANY EMPLOYEES REQUIRE TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED SKILLS AT EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN THE REGION? ARE SUCH TRAINING PROGRAMS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE? Projections for employment indicate a majority of staff positions will be made available on the service levels which will not require specific job training.. Other specialized personnel will more than likely be hired for related experiences and former education. Therefore, specialized training at educational facilities in the region will not be required. 20-5 OF-IRS FA, .1 Wade-Trim I I 1 E. ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE NON-CONSTRUCTION, PERMANENT EMPLOYEES WILL BE FOUND LOCALLY, AND WHAT PERCENTAGE MUST BE DRAWN FROM OUTSIDE THE REGION. IF THESE PERCENTAGES WILL VARY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIFE, SPECIFY. It is anticipated that virtually all non-construction, permanent employees will be found locally. F. WHAT WILL BE THE LOSS OF AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY RESOURCES ON THE SITE AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT? REFER TO EXISTING LAND USE (MAP D), PROPOSED MASTER PLAN (MAP H) AND RESPONSE TO QUESTION 12B. SPECIFY LOSSES OF ACREAGE, ANNUAL CROP YIELD, DOLLAR VALUES, ETC. Sheraton Sand Key is primarily made from Ma (Made Land) soils and Co ' (Coastal Beaches) soils that support little to no vegetation classifications that can be associated with agricultural or forestry resources. Due to the high percentage of development already ' existing on Sand Key and the lack of significant ground cover on the proposed site, there will be no loss of agricultural or forestry resources due to this development. ' G. IF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONTAIN A RESIDENTIAL ELEMENT, SPECIFY THE PERCENTAGE OF DEMANDS FOR EMPLOYMENT, RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICES GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTS THAT WILL BE SATISFIED WITHIN THE PROJECT (I.E., THROUGH THE PROVISION OF OTHER LAND USES ON THE SITE, ETC.). The development does not contain a residential element. Any demands for services generated by hotel guests have been planned for on- ' site. H. WILL THE PROJECT RECEIVE ASSISTANCE FROM FEDERAL, STATE OR OTHER GOVERNMENT FUNDING PROGRAMS? IF SO, FROM WHAT AGENCY AND WHAT IS THE AMOUNT? The Sheraton Sand Key resort will not receive assistance from federal, state or other government funding programs or agencies. I. HAS A MARKET STUDY BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? IF ' SO, A COPY SHOULD BE ATTACHED. IF NOT, DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS HOW THE DEMAND FOR THIS PROJECT WAS DETERMINED. The Sheraton Sand Key has been under the same management for over 12 years and is well-attuned to the factors which influence growth in this market. The Sheraton Sand Key management staff has years of experience in the hotel business and has been a leader in local and ' regional tourism and hotel business organizations. Sheraton Sand Key management has recognized for sometime the demand for additional .hotel rooms in the Pinellas County beach market. This demand was reinforced by estimates from the Sheraton Reservation system and the Sheraton Sand Key sales department that the Sheraton Sand Key Resort turned away over 50,000 room nights in 1986 due to the lack of 20-6 ??^asr ,7_\1\11 Wade-Trim a 9b. ?.A Si\..rlti I I 1 available space. This statistic plus regional growth indicators were the initial determinants of demand for expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key resort. 11 1 1 ?'0!. ,mod Sheraton Sand Key management, in scheduling group meetings and conferences, has identified numerous groups that have met at the existing 390 room resort facility but required overflow to area hotels. A conservative estimate of the number of outside rooms required to support overflow needs in 1986-87 was 1700. In some cases the need for additional hospitality suites, exhibit space and dining/banquet facilities limited the ability of the resort to adequately accommodate scheduled conferences and meetings. Further, numerous groups which heretofore used the existing resort have grown too large to be accommodated without the proposed expansion. The expanding number and type of organizations using the resort include civic, governmental, corporate, medical, educational, financial, banking, advertising and industrial users. Without the proposed expansion, it is likely that other resort/conference facilities outside of the Tampa Bay region and/or State of Florida will book these conferences and meetings. J. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE ESTIMATED ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX YIELD FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DURING EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE ALL ASSUMPTIONS AND STANDARDS, INCLUDING ASSESSED VALUE, EXEMPTIONS, MILLAGE RATES, ETC. All projections for future ad valorem tax yields have been assumed in 1987 dollars with current millage rates at 19.975/$1000 of taxable value. The assessed value of the Sheraton Sand Key expansion is based on current market rates for high end hotels on Clearwater Beach at $41,000 per unit. Therefore, an addition of 750 rooms, based on this assumption, projects the assessed value at $30,750,000. 1986 Actual Assessed Value: $15,668,600 Taxes: City County School Special 69,816.15 66,716.90 117,545.84 32,683.13 Total 1986 Taxes $286,762.02 20-7 Wade-Trim 1987 Proposed Assessed Value $16,000,500 Taxes: City 80,002.50 School 117,395.67 County 122,675.84 Total proposed 1987 Taxes: $320,074.01 1 Proposed Expansion ' Assessed Value2 $30,750,000 Taxes: City 147,600 ' School 227,550 County 239,850 ' Total projected taxes: $615,000 Anticipated additional revenues will be generated by the expansion ' in the form of increased vehicular traffic using the Sand Key Bridge. Additional toll monies, calculated on 354 new peak hour trips X 15 X $.50 average toll X 365 days, will result in ' $969,075.00 in gross revenues to the City of Clearwater. 1 Assessed value in 1987 dollars 2 Pinellas County Property Appraiser and Tax Assessor ' K. ESTIMATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS THAT WILL BE BORNE BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NOT PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. It is anticipated that no capital improvements and associated costs will be borne by either the City of Clearwater or Pinellas County due to this project. SSK1-11 20-8 ss:? 119 Wade-Trim C 7 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V1 W F?1 L 1 21. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT A. PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY FLOW IN MGD OF WASTEWATER GENERATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. IF APPLICABLE, PROVIDE A TABLE DESCRIBING THE VOLUME AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ANY INDUSTRIAL OR OTHER EFFLUENTS. As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, correspondence by the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the City of Clearwater requesting confirmation of service capacity and/or ability. Please refer to Exhibit 21-1 and supplemental information requests. B. WILL ON-SITE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BE PROVIDED? IF SO, ' PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE METHOD AND DEGREE OF TREATMENT AND THE QUALITY OF EFFLUENT. ALSO SPECIFY THE EXPECTED LIFE OF THE FACILITY. TO WHAT EXTENT WILL THIS FACILITY BE CAPABLE OF MEETING THE DEMANDS GENERATED BY THE PROJECT FOR ALL PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT? WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE INTERNAL COLLECTION AND TREATMENT FACILITIES? SPECIFY RECEIVING BODIES OR OTHER MEANS OF EFFLUENT DISPOSAL. IF SPRAY IRRIGATION WILL BE USED, SPECIFY LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE AREA OF SPRAY FIELDS, CURRENT WATER TABLE CONDITIONS, PROPOSED RATE OF APPLICATION AND BACK-UP SYSTEM CAPACITY. INDICATE THE VOLUME OF SLUDGE AND THE PROPOSED METHODS FOR ITS TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL. ' TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION B. (1) DESCRIBE METHODS FOR MONITORING THE POTENTIAL FOR SURFACE AND/OR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION TO THE RECEIVING BODIES SPECIFIED IN QUESTION 21.B. B. (2) HOW DOES THIS TREATMENT FACILITY RELATE TO REGIONAL FACILITIES PLANNING AND WHAT IS THE EXPECTED PHASE OUT DATE IF AVAILABLE? ' B. (3) IF SPRAY IRRIGATION WILL BE USED, SPECIFY THE MAXIMUM WATER TABLE CONDITIONS DURING WET SEASON IN THE AREA OF THE SPRAY FIELDS. See 21.A above. C. IF SEPTIC TANKS WILL BE USED ON SITE, INDICATE THE NUMBER OF UNITS TO BE SERVED, GENERAL LOCATIONS, AND ANY PLANS FOR EVENTUAL PHASE OUT. 21-1 Fes' lk,3 Wade-Trim C 7 '' dal.: ? lD?Mria TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION C. (1) PROVIDE THE CURRENT AND MAXIMUM WET SEASON WATER TABLE CONDITIONS AND PERCOLATION RATES IN THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SEPTIC TANKS. C. (2) PROVIDE INFORMATION DESCRIBING THE POTENTIAL FOR SINKHOLES IN OR ADJACENT TO ANY PROPOSED SEPTIC TANKS AND/OR SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. See 21.A above. D. IF OFF-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING TREATMENT OUTLINING: 1 P ub WE (1) THE PRESENT AND PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITY OF THE TREATMENT AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, AND (3) A STATEMENT OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING OR AFTER DEVELOPMENT. (THE AGENCY MUST BE SUPPLIED WITH THE SEWAGE GENERATION INFORMATION IN (A) ABOVE.) (4) HOW DOES THIS TREATMENT FACILITY RELATE TO REGIONAL FACILITIES PLANNING? See 21.A above. SSK1-12 21-2 Wade-Trim I' t 1 7- 11ki Table 21-1. Ultimate Estimated Average Daily Wastewater Flows. AVERAGE DAILY PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE(a) FLOW (GPD)(b) FIRST BUILDING Hotel Suite 428 rooms 100 gpd/room 42,800 Lobby Bar 75 seats 30 gpd/seat 2,250 Entertainment Lounge 250 seats 30 gpd/seat 7,500 Cafe & Dining 400 seats 50 gpd/seat 20,000 Bar (Lounge) 150 seats 30 gpd/seat 4,500 Retails 2,374 SF 0.1 gpd/SF 237 Health Spa/ Day Care 3,780 SF 0.18 gpd/SF 680 Ballroom/ Meeting rooms 1,400 seats 3 gpd/seat 4,200 Subtotal 82,167 SECOND BUILDING Hotel Suite 322 rooms 100 gpd/room 32,200 Subtotal 32,200 Total 114,367 GPD (a) - Source: Wastewater Engineering, Metcalf & Eddy, 1972. Chapter 1OD-6, Rules of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (b) - Assumed to be 100% occupied SSK2:12(5) 21-3 Wade-Trim 9 Wade-Trim November 9, 1987 1 r 1 Mr. William C. Baker, P.E., Director of Public Works City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 ®PIn®® Re: Determination of Wastewater Services for Sheraton Sand Key ®s-4 ?®?® Resort Expansion e ?.. •.?,' Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Baker: Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/ Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Group Services: The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S, Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately Engineering south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side Punning Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A. Sciences Landscape Architecture The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa, pool, lounges and housekeeping area. Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development will generate 114,356 gallons per day of domestic wastewater. Table 21-1 represents average daily wastewater flow. Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the ability of the City of Clearwater Utilities to provide wastewater services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Due to the time constraints, Should you have any questions at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa. we would appreciate an expeditious reply. concerning the project, please call me very truly yours, WADE-TRIM Hung T. Mai, P.E. HTM:ps SSK2:12(1) ZZZ2067-01 Enclosures 21-4 EXHIBIT 21-1 Wade-Trim. Inc. Member of ttie Wade-Trim Group 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard - Suite 334 - Tampa, Florida 33602 813-221-2090 - telecopier:813-229-0974 Y r 1 y F t 1 22. PUBLIC FACILITIES: DRAINAGE A. DESCRIBE THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOWN ON MAP G AND DISCUSS THE DESIGN CAPACITY CRITERIA TO BE USED FOR THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS. INCLUDE INFORMATION AS TO WHAT DESIGN STORM (E.G. 10 YEAR-24 HOUR, ETC.) WILL BE USED FOR WHAT PORTIONS OF THE SYSTEM. Existing Drainage System The proposed project site is presently vacant land with very good percolation due to sandy soil conditions. The existing topography falls from a southeast to northwest direction which is from Gulf Blvd. to the ocean. At the present time there is no existing drainage system and stormwater runoff is percolated into the ground. Proposed Drainage System The proposed drainage system will be designed to serve the planned expansion of the hotel facilities. The detention area will be designed to contain the runoff from 25-year, 24-hour storm event for post-development conditions while limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year event under existing conditions. This pond will also be designed to treat the first 1/2 inch of runoff from the respective tributary area. Treatment will be provided by percolation. Detention areas will be incorporated into the dune system and be designed to control the rate of outflow and impound specified volumes of stormwater for treatment and storage to meet Chapter 40D-4 and 17-25 F.A.C. All inflow and outflow structures will be designed to prevent erosion, scour and washouts. B. FROM MAP G, INDICATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN EACH DRAINAGE AREA, AND SPECIFY THE ACREAGE OF ANY PORTIONS OF DRAINAGE AREAS OUTSIDE THE SITE BOUNDARIES. INDICATE THE TOTAL ACRES AND STORAGE CAPACITY OF PROPOSED RETENTION AREAS, AND THE TOTAL ACRES OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. Table 22-1 Basin Area Impervious Detention Storage Water ualit Required Design (AC.) reaAAC. ) VT Act--Ft.) Treatment Vo ume V-To um-e of of iinee (Ac.-Ft.) (Ac.-Ft.) (c?Ft.) 12.00 6.76 0.94 0.31 1.25 1.40 22-1 Wade-Trim I ( C. SPECIFY AND COMPARE THE VOLUME AND QUALITY OF RUNOFF FROM THE SITE IN ITS EXISTING CONDITION TO THE ANTICIPATED RUNOFF AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE INCORPORATED IN THE DESIGN OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN RUNOFF FROM THE SITE AND TO MINIMIZE ANY DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE ULTIMATE RECEIVING BODY OVER THAT OCCURRING IN ITS PRE-DEVELOPMENT STATE. INDICATE THE MAJOR POINTS OF DISCHARGE FOR STORM WATER. 1 11 1 1 I: ' IL's C 7 1, '?r., ? As presented in Table 22-1, total storage required to maintain the pre-developed site discharge rate is 0.94 acre-feet. Total amount of storage necessary to meet water quality treatment requirements of the Stormwater Rule (Chapter 17-25), Florida Administrative Code is 0.31 acre-feet. This results in a total on-site storage volume requirement of 1.25 acre-feet. The detention ponds proposed for the site will retain and treat the first 1/2 inch of runoff from the areas tributary to respective pond. The retained volumes of stormwater runoff will be treated within detention area. This system will be designed with sufficient capacity to treat discharge the required storage within a maximum retention time of 72 hours as set forth in Chapter 17-25 F.A.C. D. WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AFTER COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT? All on-site systems, structures, and detention areas will be maintained by the Owner. SSK1-13 22-2 Wade-Trim I t 23. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY POTABLE AND NON- POTABLE WATER DEMANDS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. IF SIGNIFICANT SEASONAL DEMAND VARIATIONS WILL OCCUR, DISCUSS ANTICIPATED PEAKS AND DURATION. A. (1) DESCRIBE HOW THE DEMAND INFORMATION FOR QUESTION 23.A WAS GENERATED. As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, corres- pondence by the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the City of Clearwater requesting confirma- tion of service capacity and/or ability. Please refer to Exhibit 23-1 and Table 23-1. B. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY, BOTH POTABLE AND NON-POTABLE, BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE THROUGH PROJECT COMPLETION. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND PROVIDE A SEPARATE TABLE FOR EACH. See 23.A above. C. IF WATER WELLS EXIST ON-SITE, LOCATE THEM ON MAP H AND SPECIFY THOSE THAT WILL CONTINUE TO BE USED. ALSO LOCATE ON MAP H ALL PROPOSED ON-SITE WELLS, EXCEPT THAT FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENTS, IF INDIVIDUAL WELLS FOR EACH LOT ARE PROPOSED, INDICATE THE NUMBER OF UNITS TO BE SERVED, GENERAL LOCATIONS, AND ANY PLANS FOR EVENTUAL PHASE-OUT. INDICATE THE DIAMETER, DEPTH, AND PUMPING RATES (AVERAGE AND MAXIMUM) FOR EACH OF THE EXISTING WELLS AND PROJECT THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED WELLS (FOR LOTS SERVED BY INDIVIDUAL WELLS, THIS INFORMATION 1 MAY BE GROUPED FOR PROJECTION PURPOSES). ALSO PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE WELLS WITH REGARD TO POTABLE AND NON-POTABLE ?. SOURCES. See 23.A above. D. WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE INTERNAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM AFTER COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT? See 23.A above. E. IF AN OFF-SITE WATER SUPPLY IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: it", ?P71;M (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, 23-1 Wade-Trim I i t (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, (3) A STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY OR FIRM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. (THE AGENCY MUST BE SUPPLIED WITH THE WATER DEMAND AND SUPPLY TABLES IN PARAGRAPHS A AND B ABOVE). See 23.A above. F. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO INSURE THAT WATER PRESSURE AND FLOW WILL BE ADEQUATE FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED? See 23.A above. SSK1-14 r 23-2 a?^a? \i? Wade-Trim ! Table 23-1 Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands. AVERAGE DAILY PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE(a) FLOW (GPD)(b) FIRST BUILDING Hotel Suite 428 rooms 120 gpd/room 51,360 Lobby Bar 75 seats 30 gpd/seat 2,250 Entertainment Lounge 250 seats 30 gpd/seat 7,500 Cafe & Dining 400 seats 50 gpd/seat 20,000 Bar (Lounge) 150 seats 30 gpd/seat 4,500 Retails 2,374 SF 0.16 gpd/SF 380 Health Spa/ Day Care 3,780 SF 0.24 gpd/SF 907 Ballroom/ Meeting rooms 1,400 seats 3 gpd/seat 4,200 Subtotal 91,097 SECOND BUILDING Hotel Suite 322 rooms 120 gpd/room 38,640 Subtotal 38,640 Total 129,737 GPD (a) Source: Wade-Trim, Inc., 1987 (b) Assumed to be 100% occupied SSK2:12(6) 23-3 /.? IsO Wade-Trim C ? ] Wade-Trim November 9, 1987 Mr. Cecil Henderson Utilities Director City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue Post Office Box 4749 Clearwater, Florida 33518 a Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the ability of the City of Clearwater Utilities to provide potable water services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply. Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa. Very truly yours, n?® ®? Re: Determination of Potable Water Supply for Sheraton Sand j Key Resort Expansion Clearwater, Florida ®?Cm>I•?® Dear Mr. Henderson: Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/ Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Group Services: The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S, Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately Engineering south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side Planning Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A. Sciences - Landscape Architecture The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa, pool, lounges and housekeeping area. Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development will demand 129,737 gallons per day of potable water. Table 23-1 represents average daily potable water demand. WADE-TRIM I'f.: 1"o Hung T. Mai, P.E. r HTM:ps SSK2:12(3) ZZZ2067-01 Enclosures EXHIBIT 23-1 23-4 Wade-Trim, Inc. Member of the Wade-Trim Group 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard - Suite 334 - Tampa, Florida 33602 813-221-2090 - telecooier:813-229-0974 24. PUBLIC FACILITIES: SOLID WASTE A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. USE THE FORMAT BELOW: As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, correspondence by t, the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the City of Clearwater requesting confirmation of service capacity and/or ability. Please refer-to Exhibit 24-1 and Table 24-1. ` B. IF ON-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WILL BE PROVIDED, SPECIFY: (1) THE METHOD OF DISPOSAL AND/OR RECYCLING, (2) THE CAPACITY AND LIFE OF OPERATION, (3) THE LOCATION AND AREA OF DISPOSAL SITE, (4) THE METHODS OR TECHNIQUES WHICH WILL BE UTILIZED TO PREVENT GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION, AND (5) WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE ON-SITE OPERATION. See 24.A above. C. IF ON-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE AGENCY OR-FIRM PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: See 24.A above. SSK1-15 I 24-1 Wade-Trim ?IIL?A WE Table 24-1 Estimated Daily Volumes of Solid Waste. PROJECT PROJECT GENERATION RATE (a) AVERAGE DAILY SOLID ELEMENT AMOUNT WASTE GENERATION (b) LBS./DAY C.Y./DAY(c) FIRST BUILDING Hotel & Amenities 428 rooms 2.5 Lbs/Room/Day 1070 4.4 SECOND BUILDING Hotel & Amenities 322 rooms 2.5 Lbs/Room/Day 805 3.3 Total 1,875 7.7 (a) Source: Sheraton Sand Key Historical Usage (c) Assume to be 100% occupied (c) Assume 243 pounds per cubic yard SSK2:12(7) 24-2 Irv^p+e '9.' I!•°? Wade-Trim \.O1 r 25. PUBLIC FACILITIES: ENERGY A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY ENERGY DEMANDS AT THE END OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: ELECTRICAL POWER, GAS, OIL, COAL, ETC. FOR ELECTRICAL POWER, ALSO PROVIDE THE PEAK HOUR DEMAND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. 4a?r?i Table 25-1. Ultimate Estimated Average Daily Electrical Energy Consumption. PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE (a) FIRST BUILDING Hotel & Amenities 428 rooms SECOND BUILDING Hotel & Amenities 322 rooms 38.3 KWH/RM ENERGY PROJECTION ADD PD (b) (KWH) (KW) 16,392 1,498 38.3 KWH/RM 12,655 1,127 Total 29,047 2,625 (b) Source: Sheraton Sand Key Historical Usage (b) PD = 3.5 KW/RM B. IF THERE IS TO BE AN ON-SITE ELECTRICAL GENERATING FACILITY (POST-CONSTRUCTION) WHAT IS ITS CAPACITY AND USE? No on-site electrical generating facilities are planned for the development. C. IF ELECTRICAL POWER IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM AN OFFSITE SOURCE,. ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE ELECTRICAL GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY. 25-1 Wade-Trim r (3) A STATEMENT OF THE SUPPLIER'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. All electrical needs at the proposed facility will be served by the Florida Power Corporation. A letter has been sent to the Florida Power Corporation to verify their ability to provide service during and after project development and is illustrated in Exhibit 25-1. 0. WHAT CONSIDERATIONS RELATIVE TO ENERGY CONSERVATION HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE SITE PLANNING, BUILDING DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION FOR THIS PROJECT? The project designs will consider various methods of energy efficiency through building layout and incorporation of energy-conserving materials and equipment. It should be noted that all new construction must meet City of Clearwater codes pertaining to energy-efficient design methods and equipment. E. IF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED FOR THIS THIS DEVELOPMENT, WHY WERE THESE ALTERNATIVES SELECTED OR DISCHARGED? (E.G., SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, ETC.) Electrical power is the most reliable and cost-effective energy source and has been selected for the Sheraton Sand Key. In addition, natural gas is also utilized in conjunction with electrical power. Average daily demand for ultimate development is estimated 14,560 cubic feet of natural gas per day based upon the consumption rate at the existing 390 room facility. As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, correspondence by the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the City of Clearwater requesting confirmation of service capacity and/or ability. Please refer to Table 25-1. ?S\I?9 i71.I WA SSK1-16 25-2 Wade-Trim Wade-Trim November 9, 1987 Mr. Bruce Power Florida Power Corporation Post Office Box 1699 Clearwater, Florida 33572 r? ® Re: Determination of Electrical Power Services for Sheraton Sand 0 ®? Key Resort Expansion Clearwater, Florida ®Nr?? A Dear Mr. Power: ®hIl®® Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/ Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Group Services: The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S, Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately Engineering south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side Planning Sciences Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A. Landscape Architecture The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa, pool, lounges and housekeeping area. Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development will demand 29,047 KWH per day of electric energy. Table 25-1 represents average daily electric energy consumption. Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the ability of the Florida Power Corporation to provide electric power for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply. Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa. Very truly yours, WADE-TRIM Hung T. Mai, P.E. HTM:ps SSK2:12(4) ZZZ2067-01 Enclosures EXHIBIT 25-1 25-3 Wade-Trim, Inc. Member of the Wade-Trim Groun 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard - Suite 334 Tampa, Florida 33602 813-221-2090 ¦ telecooier: 813-229-0974 Wade-Trim November 13, 1987 Mr. Cecil Henderson Utilities Director City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue Post Office Box 4749 Clearwater, Florida 33518 Opp^1qM Re: Determination of Natural Gas Supply for Sheraton Sand ® 0 IWO Key Resort Expansion ?. .?, Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Henderson: Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/ Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion. Group Services: The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 295, Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately Engineering south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side Planning Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A. Sciences Landscape Architecture The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including conference rooms, retail 'space, restaurants, health club and spa, pool, lounges and housekeeping area. Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development will demand 14,560 cubic feet per day of natural gas. Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the ability of the City of Clearwater Utilities to provide natural gas services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort 1 Expansion. Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply. Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa. Very truly yours, WADE-TRIM t'JVI?? I""/?1 Hung Y% Mai, P.E. HTM:ps SSK2:12(3) ZZZ2O67-01 Enclosures EXHIBIT 25-2 25-4 Wade-Trim. Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard - Suite 334 ¦ Tampa. Florida 33602 Member of the Wade-Trim Group 813-221-2090 - telecopier: 813-229-0974 t 26. PUBLIC FACILITIES: EDUCATION A. IF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINS RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN EXPECTED TO RESIDE IN THE DEVELOPMENT. REFERENCE THIS INFORMATION TO SECTION 32 ON HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS. USE CLASS BREAKDOWNS APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA IN WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED (SPECIFY ON CHART BELOW): B. WILL SCHOOL FACILITIES OR SITES BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON THE SITE? C. ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE APPROPRIATE SCHOOL BOARD, ACKNOWL- EDGING RECEIPT OF THE ESTIMATED SCHOOL AGE POPULATION INFORMA- TION IN (A) ABOVE, AND PROVIDING A STATEMENT OF WHAT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADJUSTMENTS WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THESE STUDENTS. As approved at the October 26, 1987 TBRPC Pre-Application Conference, no response to Question 26 is required. SSK1-17 26-1 X7__`1\7 Wade-Trim evi-a i' 27. PUBLIC FACILITIES: RECREATION & OPEN SPACE A. DESCRIBE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE (INCLUDING ACREAGE) WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE. LOCATE ON MAP H. WILL THESE AREAS OR FACILITIES BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? Of the 11.96 acres approximately 3.1 acres of recreational and open space are to be provided on-site. Included in recreation areas are an indoor pool, outdoor pool, pool bar, sun deck - area, indoor health club, spa and access to the Gulf Beaches. Landscaped areas, accounting for open space on-site, will include a sand dune system and sea oat revegetation program. All areas designated for recreational activities will be open and available to hotel patrons and guests. Access to the Gulf Beaches is available to the general public on adjacent property to the north. B. WILL THE DEVELOPMENT REMOVE FROM PUBLIC ACCESS LANDS OR WATERS PREVIOUSLY USED BY RESIDENTS OF THE REGION FOR HUNTING, FISHING, BOATING OR OTHER RECREATION USES? SPECIFY. The hotel facility and the intended expansion have not been used for public access to the beaches for 13 years. Access is provided by the Sand Key Park located directly north of the existing hotel property. Therefore, the new development will not remove from public access land or waters previously used by residents of the region. C. WILL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OR COUNTY? IF NOT, WHO WILL MAINTAIN THE FACILITIES? The facilities on-site will be maintained by the owners. There are no parks planned for dedication to the City of Clearwater or to Pinellas County. SSK1-18 1 27-1 ??^aa a.? I\¦ Wade-Trim L ? 7 t??11.:''.al 91\?fi 28. PUBLIC FACILITIES: HEALTH CARE A. WHAT MEDICAL OR HEALTH CARE FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED ON- SITE? SPECIFY TYPE, SIZE, POPULATION TO BE SERVED, ETC., AND LOCATE ON MAP H. B. WHAT HEALTH CARE SERVICES AND FACILITIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE HEALTH NEEDS GENERATED BY THIS PROJECT? No medical or health care facilities are planned to be provided on-site. However, emergencies of a medical nature will be responded to through the local Emergency Medical Service offered by the City of Clearwater. Vehicles and medical personnel will be dispatched from Station #46 on Clearwater Beach and are able to respond to the Sheraton within two minutes. Morton Plant Hospital, approximately 8 miles away by motor vehicle, is capable of handling any emergency medical situation. A letter from the Assistant Fire Chief indicates the ability of the EMS personnel to provide such service to the new develop- ment and is enclosed as Exhibit 28-1. SSK1-19 1 28-1 ?P^?a WAS" &I Wade-Trim S7t.\?A i s i t i Office of Fire Chief Robert L Davidson CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4745 CLEARWATER,FLORIDA 33518-4748 OCT October 27, 1987 VVA.Jc -1-,ii: Ms. Bonnie Prinse Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 Dear Ms. Prinse: In response to your recent letter, the Clearwater Fire Department is aware of the proposed expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The Fire Department does not feel any expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key would have an adverse affect on the department's ability to continue to provide emergency medical service or fire protection. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, c. F. Meye Asst. Fire Chief CFM/bak EXHIBIT 28-1 "Equal Employment and Affirmatiue Action Employer" 28-2 29. PUBLIC FACILITIES: POLICE WHAT POLICE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES, OR SITES WILL BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON-SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES 1 OR FACILITIES; SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION, AND LOCATE ON MAP H. The City of Clearwater Police have been made aware of the proposed project expansion at the Sheraton Sand Key Resort and have responded favorably to continuing with police protection services. A letter has been sent to the Clearwater Police Department requesting confirmation of their continued ability to provide service to the project and.is enclosed as Exhibit 29-1. SSK1-20 29-1 WOZI &I Wade-Trim \M. VJ Wade-Trim October 7, 1987 Sid Klein, Chief of Police r;=Y^r City of Clearwater j. .? r 644 Pierce Clearwater, Florida 33515 r?s?js Re: Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion Dear Chief Klein: This letter is a request for your review of the Sheraton Sand Group Key's plans for expansion and for the City of Clearwater's Services: response to provision of support services. We are currently assembling information for the Sheraton Sand Key to obtain Engineering approval for development by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Manning Sciences Council. One of the agency's concerns is the ability of the Landscape local law enforcement to provide continued service to the Architecture project. What we are requesting from you is a letter indicating your awareness of the project plans and a statement that the City of Clearwater will be able to provide police protection service, as they have in the past. If you have additional questions, please feel free to contact me. I have also enclosed a general description of the project for your review. Sincerely, WADE-TRIM, INC. per-: Bonnie Prinse Environmental Scientist/Planner Enclosure BP:mb SSK2:8 ZZZ2067-01 EXHIBIT 29-1 29-2 Wade-Trim, Inc. Member of the Wade-Trim Group 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard - Suite 334 - Tampa, Florida 33602 813-221-2090 - telecopier: 813-229-0974 I I 30. PUBLIC FACILITIES: FIRE WHAT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES OR SITES WILL BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON-SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES OR FACILITIES, SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION; AND LOCATE ON MAP H. L Due to the nature of the hotel/resort business, several fire protection elements will be incorporated into the overall design plans of the new buildings. In accordance with the City of Clearwater Building Code, sprinkler systems will be placed consistently throughout the establishment in conjunction with a fire alarm warning system. Fire extinguishers will be placed on every level and will provide for immediate response to fire emergency situations while fire protection service will be provided by the City of Clearwater Fire Department. A letter from Asst. Fire Chief C. F. Meyer addressing the City's ability to provide service is reflected in Exhibit 30-1. SSK1-21 Wade-Trim sal.i ?/ 30-1 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518-4748 Office of Fire Chief Robert L Davidson October 27, 1987 Ms. Bonnie Prinse Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334 Tampa, FL 33602 Dear Ms. Prinse: In response to your recent letter, the Clearwater Fire Department is aware of the proposed expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The Fire Department does not feel any expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key would have an adverse affect on the department's ability to continue to provide emergency medical service or fire protection. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. Very truly yours,. C. F. Meyeir Asst. Fire Chief CFM/bak EXHIBIT 30-1 "Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" 30-2 31. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES-TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS A. USING MAP J AS A BASE, INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA (AS PREVIOUSLY DEFINED BY MAP J), INCLUDING ADT, PEAK-HOUR TRIPS, DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC LOAD, LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ROADWAY CAPACITY. WHAT IMPROVEMENTS OR NEW FACILITIES, WHICH WILL HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ARE PLANNED OR PROGRAMMED? ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY STATING THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS. (1) a. EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INCLUDING BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONDITIONS; b. THIS DESCRIPTION SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE LEVEL OF TRANSIT SERVICE. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The proposed project is located on Sand Key, just south of Clearwater Beach and adjacent to Sand Key Park. The major roadway facilities in the surrounding area are discussed in this section of the report. Street Network A map displaying the roadway network that serves the project area is included as Exhibit 31-1. Major roadways in the area include: o Gulf Boulevard is a roadway that runs along the coast between Clearwater Pass and St. Petersburg Beach. In the area of the project, Gulf Boulevard is a two-lane roadway. The Sheraton Sand Key property fronts on Gulf Boulevard. o Gulfview Boulevard is a three-lane undivided roadway that runs from Clearwater Pass to Causeway Boulevard. o S.R. 60 is an east-west roadway that connects Clearwater Beach, approximately 2.0 miles north of the project, with Hillsborough County via the Courtney Campbell ' Causeway. On the Clearwater Causeway, the road is a four-lane divided facility and through downtown Clearwater, SR 60 is a pair of three-lane one-way streets. For the rest of its traverse across Pinellas County, SR 60 is a six-lane divided facility. o Belleair Causeway/East Bay Boulevard is an east-west facility that runs between Be eair Beach and Ulmerton Road in the area of the St. Petersburg-Clearwater 1 31-1 \I?? Wade-Trim ??a0 SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT Wade-Trim Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sciences EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK EXHIBIT 31-1 Airport. Between Gulf Boulevard and Clearwater-Largo Road, the roadway has two lanes. East of that point, the roadway is a four-lane divided facility. The intersection of this roadway and Gulf Boulevard is approximately 2.3 miles south of the project. o Ulmerton Road runs from Indian Rocks Beach, approximate- ly 4.6 miles south of the project, to I-275 and Hills- borough County via the Howard Frankland Bridge. Ulmerton Road is a four-lane divided facility. Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Pinellas County Traffic Engineering Department and the City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Department, as well as recent traffic studies in the area. The available information was supplemented with counts conducted by Wade-Trim. All traffic counts were adjusted to reflect annualized average volumes. This was done using factors that were developed based on count data collected at the toll bridge at Clearwater Pass during 1986. Based upon these data, adjustment factors of 1.371 and 1.334 were calculated for the months of September and October respectively, the months during which all counts were conducted. These factors indicate that traffic volumes during those months are approximately 25 percent below the yearly average, so the counts that Wade-Trim conducted or collected were multiplied by the above- cited factors to compensate for the seasonal differ- ences. All 1985 and 1986 volumes were increased by an annual growth factor of 1.1 percent to approximate 1987 conditions. The existing P.M. peak hour turning movement volumes at the intersections are shown on ' Exhibit 31-2. The existing link volumes are contained in Table 31-1. Level-of-Service The concept of level-of-service (LOS) is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions within a traffic stream and relates them to the perceptions of motorists. The level-of-service generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. 1 31-3 Y:41\I ' Wade-Trim [ 7 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ¢ J a 53 9 -15 74.7 C N O90 N 2 ?O O ¢ W co Q ? 3 n. L c 98 ° z T 1292 a -? Cn 27 7 MARIANNE ? co a ? N ? r M T 1 80 .? 1102 -? LEGEND 238 = 1987 TRAFFIC VOLUME SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT Wade-Trim Engineering Landscape Architecture ?•?T Planning Environmental Sciences EXHIBIT EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES M-2 251 4womme 862 MARIANNE MEMORIAL CSY. r O O a d' N N 1? 0 0 J J m m J J I c? ti r? C) r 379 N cr 491 / -404 1 340 t BELLEAIR CSY. tr N r ? M N N lY D Z W O Q O O N co r 1 12 ?? ? f 2J t ? G? T e?L O WALSINGHAM O O Q Z O x U Co I.- N GULFVIEW B LVD. 743-/ 3 -% ao Co N LEGEND 238 = 1987 TRAFFIC VOLUME SHERATON ExHieir SAND KEY RESORT EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR s Wade-Trim TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES- 31-2 Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sciences r oadway ypical Section TABLE 31-1 R&ORY LINK AWILYSIS EXISTING CMDITI&ra 1987 1397 DIRECTIONAL DIRECTIONAL PEAK HOAR TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC NB/ED %/W8 V/£ LtIS 997 DIRECTIONAL PEAK HE>E1R CAPACITY kwrial Causeway Drew to Island Vay 44.D 2004 INS 0.89 D y Island Way to Mariarrr,e 4LO 1282 1007 o.57 A Causeway Blvd. Kardalay to Memorial 1 OW-WAY 1499 0.80 D 1963 Mariarre+ St. Memorial £sy. to Poinsettia 4L QNE- AY 1554 0.51 $ Poinnsettia to Mandalay 4L ONE-WAY 11,570 0.61 B 'OVA Mandalay Ave. Meavrial Csy. to papaya 2LU 764 635 1.20 E 633 Causeway Blvd. to Gulfview, 41L41 693 747 0.61 B 1224 oulfview Blvd. Corvrado to Haider, 3LU 542 613 0.69 B 830 Harden to Clearwater Pass 3Ul 401 544 0.61 B 9% Gulf Blvd. SheratOrr to Clearwater Pass 2Lli 275 375 0.59 A 639 Sheraton to Belleair Csy. 2L41 409 363 0 64 B Belleair £sy. to valsimjtam au 548 594 . 0 31 D 639 ilalsimPar•to Park Blvd. 2L41 635 696 . 03 1 E 639 • . 639 Belleair Csy. tmlf Blvd. to Harbor View au 379 404 0.? A 1425 Halsingham Rd. Golf Blvd. to Hamlin 4LU 710 1001 0.82 C 1""4 NE m- -W/C Thresholds obtained from 1965 Highway Capacity Normal -Peak horn capacities for causeways, 2 lane divided collectors and arterials taken as .05 of FWT daily capacities for similar facility type. -2LD-2 lanes divided,2L1k2 lanes undivided, etc. FM:S'r41997 The following definitions are included in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual: o Level-of-service A represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort and convenience provided to the motorist, passenger, or pedestrian is excellent. o Level-of-service B is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in ' the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS A. The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than at LOS A because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior. o Level-of-service C is in the range of stable flow, but ' marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the presence of others, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience ' declines noticeably at this level. o Level-of-service D represents high-density, but stable, flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely re- stricted, and the driver or pedestrian experiences generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause opera- tional problems at this level. o Level-of-service E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform, value. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedes- trian to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow or minor perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns. 31-7 ?P, /:' I\Y Wade Trim [ 7 I I o Level-of-service F is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Operations within the queue are characterized by stop- and-go waves, and they are extremely unstable. Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Level-of-service F is used to describe the operating conditions within the queue, as well as the point of the breakdown. It should be noted, however, that in many cases operating conditions of vehicles or pedestrians discharged from the queue may be quite good. Nevertheless, it is the point at which arrival flow exceeds discharge flow which causes the queue to form, and level-of-service F is an appropriate designation for ' such points. Policies of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) have established LOS D as the minimum acceptable standard for peak hour operation of the region's road- ways. For daily operation, LOS C has been set as the ' standard. If a particular facility is analyzed and determined to operate at a level-of-service equal to or better than these thresholds, improvements are not deemed necessary. The analysis performed for this report used standard methodologies for determining the peak hour level-of- service of intersections, roadways and bridges. For intersections, the level-of-service was determined using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) techniques de- scribed in Transportation Research Circular 212, Interim Materials in Highway Ca acit , dated January 1980 as we as the procedures defined in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. For roadway links and bridges, existing and projected traffic volumes were compared to the Capacity Tables contained in the Urban Transportation Planning Model Update-Phase II, Task C, prepared by Comsis in October 1981. The existing peak hour levels-of-service are displayed on Exhibit 31-3. PROGRAMMED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS t The Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 1988-89 through 93-94 indicates that Gulf Bou evar will Fe,widened to a three-lane divided roadway from the Clearwater Pass Bridge to Indian Rocks Beach. Construc- tion funds are committed and the work is scheduled for 31-8 /_\1k9 Wade Trim A ¦,^,• LMN N"Min t t Q Q ?. Q a D D W 3 Z O W Q C? A a 5 -j A C O GULFVIEW MARIANNE 3 @ CORONADO C Cr. B CAUSEWAY BLVD. MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY O A CAUSEWAY c @ CORONADO i0/1 9 COURT ST. o Z 8 ? ST cGz = A N - o PROJECT SITE d J ca U. J B BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY C . WALSINGHAM RD. SHERATON EXISTING INTERSECTION EXHIBIT SAND KEY RESORT P.M. PEAK HOUR Ls wade-Trim 31-3. Engineering - Landscape Architecture LEVELS OF SERVICE Planning Environmental Sciences. FY 1989-90. All analyses conducted for a later time period assume that this improvement is in place. A letter from Pinellas County confirming the status of this improvement is included as Exhibit 31-4. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Existing public transit service is provided to the Sheraton Sand Key by a trolley bus and fixed route bus service. The trolley bus runs the extent of Clearwater Beach along Gulfview and Mandalay Avenues, with a headway of approximately thirty minutes from 10:15 am to 6:15 pm. Fixed route bus service is provided directly to the Sheraton Sand Key by PSTA Route 76, with primary destination points of Clearwater Beach, downtown ' Clearwater, and Countryside Mall, and an approximate headway of one hour from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Service information and schedules are provided at centrally located and accessible locations to further utilization of available mass transit. Adequately designed bus pull out bays and shelters are provided on-site. B. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOP- MENT ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. (1) PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF PERSON TRIPS NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (INCLUDING THROUGH TRIPS) WITHIN THE INTERNAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK OF THE. PROPOSED PROJECT AS WELL AS THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. STATE ALL STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE, TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, Existing traffic volumes for the intersections and links being studied were increased by a growth factor of 1.1 percent per year. This factor was based on historical trends of count data provided by the City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Department. The existing background traffic was further increased by a second factor, the projected growth on Sand Key. Ms. Paula Harvey, Planning Director for the City of Clearwater, provided information on the allowable total build-out of Sand Key. This included the worst case scenario of 480 condominiums plus 363 condominiums that have been-approved but not yet built, and 940 hotel rooms. This is in addition to the existing development. This amount of additional development will.generate 14,254 additional 31-10 0.' i\il [ 7 Wade-Trim &VONFA ,l Wade-Trim October 19, 1987 ¦ Mr. Hugh Pascoe Transportation Planning Administrator ' Pinellas County = ' 440 Court Street ? tq J Clearwater, Florida 34616 Dear Mr. Pascoe: Vs?'k? Wade-Trim, Inc. is currently conducting l i f Sh t DRI Cl th t r the transportak d R U -, .- ana ys or era on , earwa s e f d i th Pi ll C t TIP ith er. oa way d ti f t oun oun n e ne as y , w on un s cons ruc committed for fiscal years 1988-89 and 1989-90, will be considered in the analysis as in place. The following roadway ' improvements have been identified withi n the project study area as future roadway improvements: Group o Gulf Boulevard (CR 208) Services: Construction funded FY 87-88 (1065) From 5th Avenue to 28th Avenue Engineering Improved to 2 lane divided Planning sciences o Gulf Boulevard (CR 208) Landscape Construction funded FY 88-89 (1014) ' architecture From N. Indian Rocks city limits (28th Ave.) to Clearwater Pass Improved to 2 lane divided If you agree with the current status of the above planned improvements, please endorse your concurrence below and return ' this letter. Your timely response will be most appreciated. I concur with the above roadway improvements, as found ' in the Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program, October 1987. A?L zt? - , Sign e lo-2p-g`) ' Sincerely, y - WADE-TRIM _ OCT 1987 Nathaniel Fisher Transportation Planner NCF:mh NCF1:24 EXHIBIT 31-4 ZZZ2067.04 31-11 ' Wade-Trim, Inc. 201 E. Kennedy Boulevard • Suite 334 • Tampa, Florida 33602 Member of the Wade-Trim Group 813-221-2090 • telecopier: 813-229-0974 r ' daily trips, using the ITE Trip Generation rates. A twenty year period was assumed as reasonable for the total build-out of Sand Key. These trips were distributed to Gulf Boulevard north and south of the general area of construction in proportion to the existing volumes on the ' roadway. That is, the existing traffic on Gulf Boulevard south of the area is 1.62 times the volume north of the area, so the new traffic was distributed in the same ratio. ' The peak hour directional volumes were determined by first calculating the existing directional split of peak hour traffic as a percentage of daily traffic. This was done using 24-hour traffic count data from Gulf Boulevard collected by Wade-Trim. These percentages were then applied to the projected daily generation of trips from the ' new development to obtain peak hour directional volumes of allowable development traffic. The increased existing traffic and 50 percent of the allowable development traffic were added to obtain total background traffic for 1997. Only half the allowable development traffic was added since the Sheraton build-out is 1997 and the Sand Key build-out is projected for 2007. The background roadway link traffic volumes for 1997 are shown on Exhibit 31-5. It is unlikely that such a high level of development will ever occur on Sand Key. The other scenarios that were presented by Ms. Harvey include: o 1,070 condominiums; 7,452 additional daily trips ' o 960 condominiums, 220 hotel rooms; 9,190 additional daily trips o 590 condominiums, 720 hotel rooms; 12,516 additional ' daily trips These numbers indicate that the impact from other Sand Key ' development could range from 88 to 52 percent of the traffic included in this analysis. It is reasonable to assume that one of these lesser scenarios of development will occur and therefore, the analysis contained in this document overstates the impact of this traffic component and therefore overstates the potential need for mitigation. ' C. PROJECTION OF VEHICLE TRIPS EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. STATE ALL STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, ETC. ' (1) ANSWER QUESTION C IN THE ADA, ON THE BASIS OF PERSON TRIPS RATHER THAN VEHICLE TRIPS. To obtain a trip rate for the expansion of the facility, traffic counts were conducted at the existing hotel for a one week period. 31-12 /:I I Wade-Trim [ 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 a ? Q co Q < o 11 Q A ch W 3 < + 04 z z LO a N N LC) co t- 0) C D co 1676+48-1724 ch MARIANNE ?.? + N 1069+48-1117 LO ul 1356+48-1404 W 0 m N CAUSEWAY BLVD. MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY Munloo. -b. 1 1344+79-1423 2145+79-2224 1 G 1584+79-1663 Z a ? Q X94` m ?? A s ?s + N rrx? xJr s? ? ss? ?o ?s LEGEND I- t PROJECT tO ?- o COURT STJ SITE 1 V V- W) + 222+33-255 1* 1 o BACKGROUND SANDKFY N TOTAL TRAFFIC 1 TRAFFIC * PRAFFIC io C43 cr) N o u) V cl t T + + 03 .379+69-448 • N CV) le > rn -? t U. m u7 C) r. r, N 01 Z ti 4NEE1w BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY 0 sese110' 379+42-421 q m °f 1055+56-1111 r 4swuna WALSINGHAM RD. to m ?? ti 754+34-788 0 CD t0 SHERATON EXHIBIT SAND KEY RESORT 1997 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC s wade-Trim 31-5 Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sclencei The data that were collected are: Volume of Vehicles (P.M. Peak) No. of Conference North South Drive Occupied Space ' Day of Count Drive In Out Rooms Used (SF) 9/21 9/22 56 81 50 40 103 75 169 356 0 12,904 9/23 92 119 140 382 15,500 9/24 86 81 99 379 15,500 9/25 92 109 107 378 10,304 Average T1 92 92 333 Trip generation rates were then determined based on the existing number of occupied rooms. The trip rates that were calculated are: o PM peak hour inbound - 0.40 trips occupied per room o PM peak hour.outbound - 0.40 trips occupied per room The calculated trip rates were used to estimate the number of trips that the expansion of the hotel will generate. There was some concern that a trip rate based only on occupied rooms would be inaccurate due to the amount of conference space at the hotel. For example, there could be a local conference at the hotel where no rooms are occupied and the trip generation rate would indicate that such a conference would generate zero trips. This situation did not occur during the period studied by Wade-Trim. ' The Sheraton Sand Key has 15,500 square feet of conference facilities. For two of the study days, all of the' facilities were being used. On two more days, 66 percent ' and 83 percent of the conference facilities were used. On Monday, the day when none of the facilities were being used, people were checking into the hotel for conferences that week. Trips on Monday were being generated (at a rate ' almost exactly that being used for the DRI analysis) but the conference facilities were not generating them. When the conference facilities were in use, the trip rate fell ' slightly, but not a significant amount. Thus, based on this data, the trip rate based on the number of occupied rooms is appropriate. s?^?s it IIL i 31-14 Wade-Trim Using these trip generation rates the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key is anticipated to generate the following number of vehicle trips: Trip Generation (Vehicle Trips) ' Land Use Amount PM Inbound PM Outbound ' Hotel 750 rooms 300 300 This assumes that all 750 rooms are occupied, providing a conservative analysis of traffic impact. Vehicle trips were converted to person trips by applying a vehicular occupancy rate of 1.6 persons per vehicle. This rate was obtained from NCHRP Report Number 187 nick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques an Transfer- able Parameters. Using this rate, the Sheraton Sand Key expansion is estimated to generate 480 PM peak hour inbound person trips and 480 PM peak hour outbound person trips. ' D. ESTIMATE THE INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C), ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL ACCOUNT FOR THIS INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT. (1) ESTIMATE THE EXTERNAL/INTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED ' TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT (I.E. PROVISION OF ON- SITE SHOPPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES, ON-SITE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, ETC.) WILL ACCOUNT FOR THESE SPLITS? ' Since the trip generation rate used in Question 31C of this report is based on actual counts at the project site, it would take into consideration current internal capture of trips and transit usage. Therefore, no additional capture ' of trips is proposed. E. USING MAP J AS A BASE, ASSIGN THE TRIPS GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE AND SHOW SEPARATELY THE TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (B) ABOVE TO THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA, AND ' INCLUDE ADT, PEAK HOUR TRIPS AND DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC LOAD. IF NECESSARY, PROVIDE A SEPARATE MAP J FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOP- MENT SHOWING EXPECTED CONDITIONS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. Because the project is a hotel, it has a distribution of trips that is different from the standard DRI project. A hotel that serves a large number of tourists does not have the normal pattern of home-based and non-home-based trips. Visitors to the Sheraton Sand Key will make trips to the local beaches, 31-15 Ir I? I Wade-Trim ' ? il.41 I I restaurants and tourist attractions instead of to and from work. Therefore, the computer models that are normally used are not applicable for this project. To develop a distribution for project trips, an origin-destin- ation study was conducted during the PM peak period for three days. Vehicles going into and out of the Sheraton Sand Key were stopped and the driver was asked his origin/destination and his main routes of travel. ' From this information, a PM peak hour trip distribution pattern was developed. This distribution was reviewed by the agencies and is shown as Exhibit 31-6. During the PM peak hour, 43 percent of the vehicles that leave ' the project travel north toward Clearwater Beach. Eight percent of the project traffic has Clearwater Beach as their destination, eight percent continues northward toward Dunedin and Tarpon Springs, and 27 percent travel east on SR 60 to ' destinations in eastern Pinellas County and Hillsborough County. ' Fifty-seven percent of the PM peak hour project traffic travels southward from this project. Seven percent of the project traffic turns east to go over the •Belleair Causeway, seven percent travels eastward on Ulmerton Road and 38 percent continues south on Gulf Boulevard. The inbound distribution during the PM peak hour is very ' different. Three-quarters of the inbound traffic is from the north primarily from Tampa International Airport. The inbound traffic from the south was divided among several origins. ' Exhibit 31-7 illustrates the assignment of project traffic at the intersections analyzed. F. BASED ON PROJECTED TRIPS AS SHOWN IN (E) ABOVE, WHAT MODIFICA- TIONS IN THE HIGHWAY NETWORK (INCLUDING INTERSECTIONS) WILL BE NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT? SPECIFY IMPROVE- MENTS NEEDED INITIALLY AND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOP- MENT. (1) ANSWER QUESTION 31 F. ABOVE, ON THE BASIS OF THE ENTIRE ' TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (RATHER THAN JUST THE HIGHWAY NETWORK) INCLUDING INTERSECTIONS AND ACCESS POINTS TO THE DRI. INCLUDE APPROPRIATE MASS TRANSIT CONSIDERATIONS. ' (2) WHO WILL PAY FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SPECIFIED IN QUESTION 31F. Tables 31-2A, B and C display the results of the roadway link-analysis and Table 31-3 displays the intersection analysis results. The 1997 level.s of service for ' intersections are displayed on Exhibit 31-8. The analyses 31-16 se0110^a¦ x__\1!1 Wade-Trim 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 a } a a -j W a z 201 z 2 r a 121 MARIANNE 153' 60 81 --*- CAUSEWAY BLVD. 10 O 24 ?? 1 f* i 81 z C 221 p 6 0 UU a ?0 PROJECT `r SITE 129 225 171 75 t] J co 56 J 69 I L 135 21 21 j L. L7 114 21 1141 21 F9 A' a COURT ST. I LEGEND DIRECTIONAL PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS. SHERATON ExHiBIr SAND KEY RESORT 1997 PROJECT TRIP s Wade-Trim DISTRIBUTION 31-6 Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning- Environmental Sclences Q 3 0 z a J N 2or 0 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY 'bN BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY WALSINGHAM RD. r i 1 1 i 1 Y Y 1 C t] C13 co J J (3 ? 00 co cm r` ~ ~ CD La NORTH SOUTH SHERATON DR. SHERATON DR. 74 ..? 55 97 o r 74 N CO ? co co 0 N o co w o ° D. Q r 2 Q N U - N co N S?,x N N cm N N GULF NO VIEW BLVD. ? 906+105°1011 0 t ?G N CO J to 0 `/ r 1 1A?8,c7 4?j + 0 cm CO S, ?'S O S? LEGEND 222+33-255 BACKGROUND PROJECT ,TOTAL TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC SHERATON EXHIBIT' SAND KEY RESORT 1997 P.M. PEAK HOUR s Wade-Trim TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES 31- Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sclenees r r t i i 0 } N Q ? J JQ • N r T i Jr Ar CV) L T J1 Q W co z a '%. 109 f- 1480+201-1681 30 MARIANNE ) 1 W 0 co cm } Q 0 z Q J co 598 4- 16 " 877+2011078 MARIANNE I LO 0 co u It N CO N T <C T T 1302+81=1383 =-00 ?.. 278 1005+201=1206 MEMORIAL CSY. LEGEND ? 222+ 33-256 BACKGROUND PROJECT TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TOTAL TRAFFIC SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT Wade-Trim Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental Sciences O EXHIBIT 1997 P.M. PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES 131-7 I I r i 1 No, Im, so aw IM, go "a) M OR TABLE 31-M MOWN LINK QSLYSIS YEAR 1337 CO DIT106 WITH 100% 80011PROCY PROJM BACKDROLM BADORO W TRAFFIC TRAFFIC MJECT TRAFFIC DIRECIIONX BADUNUM BAf](9RMM r f LOS D Typical Ptak flaw Peak Hoar Peak Nun- VM H" TRAFFIC PRliff£T TRAFFIC CMTRtBLM BY INDICATED Rcadwmy Section !DIED SBIHB !BLEB SB/MB NM SB/MB LINK CAPACITY VIC LOS VI£ US PRDW INPROWOM Memorial Caasawmy Drew to Island Nay 4LD 2224 1404 Island Nay to Marianne 4LD 1423 1117 Causeway Blvd. Mandalay to Memorial 3L OW- W • 1663 Nariare 9t. Nemoriml Csy. to Poinsettia 4L ME- W 1724 Poinsettia to Nardalmy 4L ME-W 1724 Mandalay Ave. Memorial Csy. to papaya 2LU 849 705 Causeway Blvd. to Dnlfview 4Li1 758 823 Bulfview Blvd. Ccrrwedri to Hamden 3LU 663 714 Hudenn to Clearwater Pass 3LU 5% 661 9nlf Blvd. Sheraton to Clearwater Pass 3LU 305 416 Sheraton to Belleair Csy. 3LU 452 403 Belleair Csy. to Nalsir#wam 3LU 608 643 Valsir4 m to Park Blvd. 2LU 705 773 Belleair Csy. 8ulf Blvd. to Harbor View 2w 42a 448 Nalsir# m Rd. Golf Blvd. to Hamlin 4W 788 lilt MM: -VIC Tlrrestalds attained from 1365 Highway Capacity Manaal -Peak how capacities for causeways, 2 tare divided collectors and arterials taken as .05 of FDDT daily cepicitims far similar facility type. -aDm2 lanes dividedlalk-2 laces urdivided, etc. -? Derrerdly striped as 2 lanes, but operates as 3 laces, with 2 serge laces at 201 2305 1605 2900 0.89 9 0.92 E. 3.6 at 201 1504 1318 2900 0. 97 A 0.60 R lil at 1744 2070 0.80 C 0.84 8 tit 201 1925 2840 0.61 9 0.66 B NA 201 1325 2840 0.61 B 0.66 B NR 24 12 872 717 710 1.19 E 1.23 E 3.6 24 213 782 1042 1360 0.61 B 0.77 C to 105 153 788 867 330 0.72 C 0.88 9 tit 129 225 675 am 330 0.67 9 0.83 9 NA 123 22,`1 434 641 930 0.42 A 0.65 B tit 63 1% 521 593 9% 0.46 A 0.53 A NA 57 135 665 778 9% 0.65 8 0.73 C MA 30 114 735 887 710 1.09 E 1.25 E 17.6 21 12 442 460 1230 0.36 A 0.37 R NA 21 27 803 1138 1360 082 9 0.84 9 WR 3LU TABLE 31-8 ROADWAY LINK ANALYSIS YEAR 1337 CONDITIONS WITH 73% OCEUPVO PROJN3,T MOROM + BADWS 6 TRAFFIC TRAFFIC PRO ECT TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL BACKORM . BAC%GROM + f LOS D Typical Peak Hear Peak W" Peak Hoar PEAK HOWR TRAFFIC PROMET TRAFFIC CONNTRIBIM BY INDICATED lbadeay Section NB/a SB/WB NO/EB 90/14B NE/E9 S9/N8 LINK CAPACITY We L09 Y/C L09 PROJECT IMPROVENW Pm *I Carsaway Drew to Island Way 4LD 2224 1404 59 147 2283 1551 2500 0.09 D 0.31 £ 2.6 Island Way to Marianne 4LD 1423 1117 59 147 1462 1264 2500 0.57 A 0.53 A MR Causeway Blvd. Mandalay to meow at 3L ONE-M a 1663 53 1722 2070 0.80 C 0.83 D NN Marianne St. NNemm-faf Csy. to Poinsettia 4L ONE-MY 1724 147 1671 2846 0.61 9 0.66 9 1«t poinsettia to Mandalay 41. ONE-MY 1724 147 1871 2840 0.6t 9 0.66 9 NA Mandalay Ave. New at Csy. to Papaya 2w 848 705 18 3 866 714 7t0 1.19 E 1.22 E 2.6 Causeway Blvd. to Oulfview 41.11 758 823 18 IV, 776 984 1360 0.61 9 0.72 C MR %Ifview Blvd. C orw& to Handen 3LU 683 714 77 112 760 826 9% 0.72 C 0.63 0 MR Raid" to Clearwater Pass 3LU 545 661 94 164 640 em 9% 0.67 9 0.83 9 M gulf Blvd. Sheraton to Clearwater Pass 3LU 305 416 94 164 333 580 9% 0.42 A 0.53 A MR Sheraton to Selieair Csy. 3LU 452 403 50 114 502 517 930 0.46 A 0.51 A NA Betieatr Csy. to WaisingAaa 3LU 608 643 42 33 650 742 990 0.65 9 0.75 C Nei Walsingham to Park Blvd. 2LU 705 773 22 63 727 IFA 710 1.03 E 1.21 E 13.0 2LD Belleair Csy. Golf Blvd. to Harbor Vim 2LU 421 448 15 3 436 457 1230 0.36 A 0.37 A NR Waisieghan Rd. Nlalf Blvd. to Hamlin 4LU 788 1111 15 20 803 1131 1360 0.62 D 0.83 0 Nil fM}TEs -V/C TtmW*ids obtained frca 1%5 Hilt ay Capacity Nanuai -Peak hour capacities for causeways, 2 lane divided collectors and arterials taken as .05 of ROT daily capacities for similar facility type. -ii-2 lanes divided,2LU-2 lanes undivided, etc. -+ Currently striped as 2 lanes, but operates as 3 lanes, with 2 merge lanes TABLE W-M ROAMW LUR ANALYSIS YEAR 1937 OEL P NCY MNDITItN S SiMRRY KITH 100 % OCD)PANEY VITH 73 f OFXXI N Y BACKORCIM + % LOS D BACKSUM + % LOS D Typical PFAW TRAFFIC CONTRIBUM BY PRWECT TRAFFIC CDNTRIMM BY Roadway 9ection WC LOS PRWM V!C LOS PRWE£f NEW at Causeway Drew to Island Way 4I D 0.92 E 16 0.91 E 2.6 Island fay to Nariarre 4fD 0.60 R NR 0.513 R NR Causeway Blvd. Mandalay to Memorial 3L OW-M e 0.84 D 1P 0.63 D NR Mariam 9t. Newveial Csy. to Pbinseettia 4L DE-M 0.68 9 tR 0.66 8 NR Poinsettia to Mandalay 4L D E-W 0.68 9 fR 0.66 9 NR Mandalay Ave. Memorial Csy. to Papaya 2W 1.23 E 3.8 1.22 E 2.8 Causeway Blvd. to gulfview 4LU 0.77 C tR 0.72 C 1R gulfview Blvd. Cmumdo to Hamden 3W 0.88 D NA 0.83 D 1R Hamden to Clearwater Pass 3W 0.93 B tR 0.83 D tR gulf Blvd. Sheraton to Clearwater Pass 3W 0.65 9 1R 0.0 R NR Sham an to Bellesir Csy. 3W 0.53 R MR 0.51 R tR Belleeir Csy. to falsinyhaw 3W 0.79 C NR 0.75 C to Valsinghaw to Park Blvd. 2W 1.2i E 17.8 1.21 E 13.0 Belleair Csy. Belt Blvd. to ffartor View 2W 0.37 A to 0.37 R tR falsinghaw Rd. gulf Blvd. to Mawtin 4W 0.84 D tR 083 D tR tf47E: iVC Ttnesholds obtained from 1%5 Highway Capacity Nasal -Feak hoer capacities for cousrmrM 2 lare divided collectors and arterials -e Cwrentfy striped as 2 lanes, but operates as 3 Imes, with 2 merge laves 1 1 i 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 31-3. 1997 Intersection Analysis. 1997 Existing Background Total Project Traffic Intersection LOS Traffic LOS Traffic as % of Total LOS Traffic Sheraton Driveway - North - - D _ Sheraton Driveway - South - - D - Gulfview @ Hamden A A B 15.8 Gulfview @ Coronado B C D 15.4 Coronado @ Causeway Blvd. A B B 1.8 Marianne & Mandalay A B B 8.2 Marianne & Poinsettia A A A 3.9 Memorial Csy. @ Island Way C D D 7.7 Gulf Blvd. @ Belleair Csy. B C D 6.2 Gulf Blvd. @ Walsingham C D D 1.6 SSK1:4 31-24 ¦pp"ME /_ ,611 Wade-Trim [ 7 LINNIA > Q Q ? a Q J D Z Cl) Z Q 2 B a GULFVIEW MARIANNE @ CORONADO CAUSEWAY BLVD. © CAUSEWAY o @ CORONADO v °C Z w S PROJECT SITE t] m U. J BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY WALSINGHAM RD. H t%1 w Cr 0 H N COURT ST. SHERATON EXHIBIT SAND KEY RESORT 1997 INTERSECTION P.M. PEAK rg Wade-Trim HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 31°8 Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning Environmental 3clencea Q 3 Z Q J V) MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY SHERATON NORTH DR. SHERATON SOUTH DR. 1 11 were performed using no transit beyond the level that currently exists. Table 31-2A displays the results of the analysis if the hotel is 100 percent occupied. Based on occupancy information for the years 1983-1986, the hotel averaged a yearly occupancy rate of only 73 percent. Table 31-2B shows the result of an analysis using this occupancy rate. Table 31-2C provides a summary of this data. Since the intersections all operated at an acceptable level of service even when the traffic for 100 percent occupancy was included, no intersection analysis was performed for the 73 percent occupied condition. The intersection analysis was a two-step process. First, the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) technique was used to determine an intersection's LOS with project traffic included and the percentage of intersection capacity that the project traffic represented. If the intersection operated at LOS D or worse and if project traffic represented five percent or more of the capacity, the intersection was further analyzed using the SICA computer program. The CMA and SICA worksheets are included as Appendix B to this report. Roadway links were analyzed by comparing projected future directional volumes to the hourly capacity volumes contained in the Urban Transportation Planning Model Update Phase II, Task C. A copy of this table is included in Appendix B. The level of service is based on the peak direction of total traffic, which is not necessarily the peak direction of project traffic. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council requires that a development's impact be mitigated if the project traffic is equivalent to five percent or more of the peak hour LOS D capacity of the roadway facility and if the facility is operating at an unacceptable level-of-service. At those locations that exceed the TBRPC thresholds, improvements are listed that will return the facility's level-of- service to what is deemed acceptable by the TBRPC. The link analysis indicated that the following roadway may require improvement: o Gulf Boulevard from Walsingham to Park - This roadway should be widened to a three-lane section. This section of roadway will be improved as part of the recently advertised PD & E study to be conducted by Pinellas County under the auspices of the FOOT. 31-26 eP^qe I__\ i\1 Wade-Trim !1??ri? The intersection analysis indicated no locations that require improvement. The intersections that will ?.. operate at LOS D were examined with 1985 Highway CaRaciU Manual analysis techniques and it was found under tie more stringent software, that only Gul f and Walsingham will operate at LOS E. However, project traffic comprises only 1.6 percent of the capacity at this location. The analysis provided in this document is a conservative estimate of the impact the expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key will have on the Clearwater area. The assumptions used that cause the analysis to provide conservative results include: o The background traffic was factored to present annual average volumes. While the FDOT would require increasing September and October volumes by 12-15 percent to obtain annual average, it was recognized that traffic at the beach fluctuates more than it does on a Pinellas County-wide basis. The factors used were based on count data collected at the Clearwater Pass Toll -Bridge and increased the raw volumes by over 30 percent. o The analysis was performed as if the hotel will always be 100 percent occupied. In fact, over the last four years, the occupancy rate has average only 73 percent. Thus, the impact of project traffic on the roadway has ,M, been overstated. o Traffic from future Sand Key development was included for the highest possible level of development. It is not anticipated that this level of development will occur and the impact of this component of traffic will be less than stated in this document. G. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING, PARKING PROVISIONS, LOCATIONS, ETC. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE FOR THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE BY MEANS OTHER THAN PRIVATE AUTOMOBILE? (1) WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS? ALSO, WHAT FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND/OR CONSTRAINTS WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE TO FOSTER UTILIZATION OF MASS TRANSIT? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING, PARKING PROVISION, LOCATION, ETC. Public transit is not currently heavily used as a. means to access the Sheraton Sand Key and, by not including it in' this document, a conservative analysis was provided. 3.1-27 I.?? \\ Wade-Trim av??i Design considerations will be made for the continued operation of commercial shuttle vehicles and the Clearwater Beach trolley. No special consideration will be made for PSTA buses beyond what is comparable to the current situation. t SSK1-22 31-28 I_\ I\\ Wade Trim I I 32. HOUSING: PROVISION OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS A. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY PRICE OR RENTAL RANGE, TYPE OF UNIT 9E.G., SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED, GARDEN APARTMENT, TOWNHOUSE, MOBILE HOME, ETC.) AND NUMBER OF BEDROOMS. (IF THE APPLICANT DOES NOT INTEND TO CONSTRUCT THE UNITS, ESTIMATE THE INFORMATION.) USE THE FORMAT BELOW FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. B. WHAT NUMBER AND PERCENT OF LOTS WILL BE SOLD WITHOUT CONSTRUCT- ED DWELLING UNITS? WHAT IS THE EXTENT OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE ON THESE LOTS PRIOR TO SALE? C. WHAT WILL BE THE "TARGET GROUP" FOR THE MARKETING EFFORT FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND LOTS? BREAK DOWN BY NUMBER, PER CENT AND TYPE THE DWELLING UNITS TO BE MARKETED FOR RETIRED PERSONS, FAMILIES, SINGLES, ETC. WHAT PORTION WILL BE MARKETED AS SECOND OR VACATION HOMES? 0. HOW WILL THE MARKETING EFFORT FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND LOTS BE DISTRIBUTED: 1) WITHIN THE REGION, 2) WITHIN THE STATE, OR 3) OUTSIDE THE STATE? E. IS THE DEVELOPMENT REGISTERED OR WILL REGISTRATION BE REQUIRED WITH THE DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES UNDER CHAPTER 478, FLORIDA STATUTES? WILL THE DEVELOPMENT BE REGISTERED WITH THE H.U.D., OFFICE OF INTERSTATE LAND SALES REGISTRATION OR WITH OTHER STATES. F. WHAT ARE THE NET AND GROSS RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES FOR THE OVERALL PROJECT AND FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN? (MAP H) As approved at the October 26, 1987 TBRPC Pre-Application Conference, no response to Question 32 is required. SSK1-23 32-1 s.`1?b Wade-Trim r I I 1 APPENDIX A t Appendix A Selected Data From Clearwater Harbor/St. Joseph Sound Intensive Survey Documentation Water Quality Technical Series Volume 1 Number 89 FDER Bureau of Water Quality Management Water Quality Analysis Section - April 1987 t ciT A"drr ; f 1 • is c+? KEY SANO pT. 2 .? • ???;. ,SMII?03 KLOSTENMAN 4 PT. 8 ?'L«•+s AREA May O INOIAN . ;.: OF Ii 13, •L?i:' .0 SCRiSTAL OEACM SCASIOE f1T : •? PT. ?' •• PALM MONCYY00N a, : ?5:11 MAROON J,,?? r??f 1 N Oz 0NA% 9 8 y•;::r NVRNIC4ME 0433 • ? L' LONE In ?'• L`y? : OAK PT. V ?• N ±x,18 ••??`• 10 CALAOZZI 13. i. Oulleasol PAS • :x 22 • 21 CLEARWATER OEACH 13. 1 ?2 tti IT i /i .. tL. 19 r'•. 20 CLEARMATLN P&33 : . • lt. 14 ?- Q y! CLEARWATER sANo ? 15. ? 3 •- < KEY or 16 1. :O[lLtA1N ?' C3 LAN" 17 STATUTE YI1693 ???? •~:???? GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF WATER OUAIITY SAMPLING STATIONS. •?? ty t 1 t i i 1 e 0% 15 a E 7 u C 0 u' O e C a v P 0 a E 0 e 0 s 4 Nar 38 ,34- 32- 30- 2a 26- 24- 22- 20- i a 18 14 12 10 Nov Clearwater Harbor Steffan A Clearwater Harbor Staffnn A W%a"-o'? Matie4 may-84 Jul-84 Sunray date aan-a.* mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date 1 1 y a c v w c a 0 2 40 38 38 34 32 30 28 28 24 22 20 is 18 14. 12 10 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Nov-83 Jan-84 Dior-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date 9.0 a.a a.6 8.4 a.2 a.o 7.a = 7.6 a c 7.4 7.2 7.0 a.a a.a 6.4 8.2 8.0 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Nov-83 Jan-a4 mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date t 2.6 2.4 2.2 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Nov-0.3 aan-a4 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Sunray date 2.0 a. E 1.8 c 1.6 0 0 1.4 2 1.2 c 0Ls 1.0 0 c 0.8 0 1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 14 130 t 120 0 v Tr = 110 0 Y 0 c 100 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 ao -?-- Nov-83 QO pan-54 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Surrey date Y 6 S Clearwater Harbor Station 4 ? 4 of E in 0 3 m 41 e 0 2 1 0 -f- Nov-83 A O H 0 0 m e 0 • Jul-84 Jan-84 Mar-84 May-84 Survey data Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Nov-83 Jan-a4 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey data 10 9 a 7 a 3 4 3 2 1 0 t 0.04 0.04 0.03 Ol E 0.03 d c 0 u a 0.02 r C` 0 0.02 c A 0.01 o.ot 0.00 Nov-63 0.20 0.19 0.1 a 0.17 0.16 ?? 0.13 a 0.14 E 0.13 j 0.12 u 0.11 0.10 U 0.09 a o.oa 0.07 0.08 Z O.Os 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Nov-a3 Jan-a4 Mar-84 May-a4 Jul-84 Survey date Jan-a4 Mar-a4 May-a4 Jul-a4 Survey date t t 0.0 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 0.06 a 0.03 E c 0.04 0 u 2 M 0.03 S 2 C 0.02 0.01 0.00 -}-- Nov-83 0.0 ran-a4 Mar-84 May-84 Survey date Clearwater Harbor Station 4 0.08 a E 0.03 0 e 0 u 0.04 2 n Z 0.03 O e 0.02 Z 0 • Z 0.01 Jul-84 0.00 +-- Nav-83 Jan-a4 Mar-84 May-84 Survey date Jul-84 r i i i a u c 0 u 0 t a 0 L u c 0 0 L-I Clearwater Harbor Station 4 Nov-as 30 28 26 24 22 20 i8 16 14 12 10 e e 4 2 0 .ion-a4 Mar-84 May-84 Survey data Clearwater Harbor Station 4 4.0 2.4 2.2 I1 4:Z? 2.0 a? v 1.8 u c 1.8 0 u c 1.4 1 1.2 0 v 1.0 .c Q. 0.8 c 0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Jul-84 Nov-S3 Jan-84 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date 0 v I a 0 0 u c 0 0 Clearwater Harbor Station 4 ov-oa don-94 Mat-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date 10 9 8 7 !3 s 4 3 2 t 0 N Clearwater Harbor Station 13 8 a O? v 7 O c O u O c a- c 0 • s 4 NOV-83 Clearwater Harbor Station 13 P P « c O • 36 34 32 30 2a 26- 24- 20- la is 14 12 10 Nav-83 Jan-a4 Mar-64 May-a4 Jul-a4 Survey data Jan-84 Mar-64 May-" Jul-84 Survey date 1 1 1 1 i 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clearwater Harbor Station 13 9.0 ax 8.8 a.4- &2 e.o 7.8 w v = 7.8 a. 7.4- C 7.2- 7.0- ax 6.6- a.4- a-2 8.0 Nov-83 Jon a4 Mar-84 I.lay-84 Jul-84 Survey date lz? G. `c 0 • 0 C • Z Clearwater Harbor Station 13 Nav-83 Jan-84 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey data 40 38 38 34 32 30 28 28 24 22 20 18 .a 14 12 10 Clearwater Harbor Station 13 2.60 2.40- 2.20- 2.00- E 1.ao 1.60 c a 0 1.40- 1.20- 1.00- c 0 0.60 0 0.80- 0.40 0.20 0.00 Nov-63 Jan-a4 Mar--84 May-a4 Jul-64 Survey date Clearwater Harbor Station 13 140 130 120 110 0 Y O C 100 Nav-83 Jon-84 90 1 1 1 I ' Mares-a4 May-a+ wu-v-r Survey date 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 e s 4 o. E n O V c 0 0 2 a? 0 C4 G O m 0 0 C • I Clearwater Harbor Station 13 0 'L Nov-83 Jul-84 Jan-84 Mar-84 May-84 Survey data Clearwater Harbor Station 13 Nav-a3 Jan-84 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date 10 9 a 7 e S 4 3 2 1 O 1 1 1 1 A 1 i 1 r t Clearwater Harbor Station 13 0.040 0.035 0.030 E 0.025 u 0 C a 0.020 0 .c c 0.015 c 0.010 0.003 0.000 Nov-= Jan-84 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 a 0.14 E 0.13 0.12 c 0.11 0 0.10 4 0.09 0.08 r 0.07 a 0.08 2 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 Uar--84 Uay-84 Jut-84 Survey date Clearwater Harbor Statlon 13 Nav-83 Jan-84 Mar-84 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 II II N 11 li Clearwater Harbor 0.07 Station 13 0.06- 0.05 E c 0.04- z 0.03- z e 0.02 0.01 0.00 Nov-83 Jon-84 moo -64 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date Clearwater Harbor 0.07 Station 13 0.06- 0.05- a ? 0.04 z 6 z 0.03 N O c 0.02- C a A 0.01 0.00 ..a.,-p" MCW-.64 May-64 Jul-84 Survey date a d C 0 0 t a 0 2 u e 0 e 30 21 21 24 2: 20 1e is 14 12 10 a 6- 4- 2- 0- Now 2.8 2.4 2: 2. a 1.! d 0 1.6 u 1 1.4 0. 1.2- 0 1.0. r G. O.Q e a- 0.6- 0.4- 0.2- 0.0- Nov Clearwater Harbor c?..at..? . t Clearwater Harbor s&..fr....-oft mar-04 UCy--84 Jul-64 Survey dote -T me -04 Yay- 54 Jul-84 Survey date r 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 R 0 v 0 0 u c a 3 10 S a 7 a s 4 3 2 1 O Na Clearwater Harbor S!alinn 1 t i ••?•-o• MCr-64 May-84 Jul-84 Survey date t it U 1 I I APPENDIX B APPENDIX B 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis for Unsignalized Intersections Wade Trim Inc. Critical Movement Analysis S.I.C.A.P. - Version 3.2 - 2/87 Location: Walsingham and Gulf Boulevard Recommended Base Capacities UTPS Hourly Intersection Capacities in Vehicles/Hour/Lane r t r t 1 1 17:04=22 11-05-1987 J. 'M) 42? M; " :L g t-% :.•s cax y +cZ p .ca 4= i. -U y M ,=-t r. 2-k.Mt 1 *=4 rr c $ y s i 8 tj r. s z 3 i c-- d 1 r. -b- r- s c 1 c• r-r s ca Li L- F= E=-c r> l=W4 ID C3 FZ -I- F-1 31 FE: ------ GULF -BLVD. -- C ------ 'J5= 461 NL= 'J_----- -44 43 NL= 2 478 =V2---- i 128 =V3----'J --- ----- --- - - - --- i i ! '?f v3 j 74 97 NL- 2 NORTH DRIVE Date of Counts: 1997 Time of Courts: PM PEAK Prevailing Speed: 30 Type of Traffic Control: STOP ----------------- STOP 'Jo l urge Act ua 3 Shared Reserved Movement in Capacity Capacity Capacity LOS Nulaber --------- pcph ------- pcph ---------- pcph ---------- pcph ----------- ------ 4 47 635 635 586 A 7 91 201 201 120 D 9 106 683 683 576 A x 1 1 r l M ro 1 A e 17:05:59 11-05-1987 1 '2i? as = . " -t Cl t-r %-P ?et y C--,ak pr zc C 1 •t< y M,=-t r-r *-s z-:t 1 $=? r-r .a IL f LJ r'r S :L gt r'r zit 1 a @ d 1 r'r "= 4--- i^ !E- 4 C -b Y e=. r-r s C3 Li L_ 1= Ist L- N.$ ID . i=k "1:> !E C3 L.A -r 5 -? I> 1FZ X '-%o# SE GULF BLVD. <------ V5= 446 NL= 2 V------ V4= 32 NL= 2 575 =V2----`r 97 ='v'3----V <i i> ! 1 V7 'J9 55 74 NL= 2 SOUTH DRIVE Date of Counts: 1997 Time of Counts: PM PEAK Prevailing Speed: 30 Type of Traffic Control: STOP Vo i erne Movernerrt i rr Number- pcph 4 35 7 60 9 81 ----------------- STOP Actual Shared Reserved Capacity Capacity Capacity LOS pcpf-r - ------ acph ---------- pcph ---------- ------- 588 588 553 A 198 1S8 138 D 622 622 541 A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI GULFVIEN I HAMDEN DATE: 1987 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 371 CRITICAL N/S VOL 520 CRITICAL E/W VOL 119 CRITICAL SUM 639 ffttiftfftftttfttfttffftttttttffftttt j LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LANE NOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... RL. 12.0 2 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 3 ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 7 19 0 101 THRU 321 439 0 8 RIGHT 73 21 0 20 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/N :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - 1 -RIGHT 445 520 0 0 .EFT 15 42 0 119 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 7 19 0 101 t ISTED VOL 15 42 .0 119 'ACITY 0 75 0 0 MOVEMENT NO OK. N/A NIA MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI GULFVIEW @ HAMDEN DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND ttftffftitftffftttfftfffffttfffttffft LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 451 CRITICAL N/S VOL 633 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 779 4 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MDV WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. . 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... RL. 12.0 2 L.• 12.0 L.• 12.0 •.• •..• •.• •..• 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 7 21 0 124 THRU 438 537 0 22 RIGHT 101 24 0 22 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 NESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 -RIGHT 608 633 0 0 LEFT 15 47 0 146 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND IT VOLUME 7 21 0 124 JUSTED VOL 15 47 0 146 CAPACITY 0 25 0 0 CEMENT NO NO N/A N/A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI GULFVIEW @ HAMDEN DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 601 CRITICAL NIS VOL 885 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 1031 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV,WIDTH NOV WIDTH ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... Rl. 12.0 1 L.. 12.0 L.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .. ... .... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND # LEFT 7 21 0 124 THRU 543 762 0 22 RIGHT 125 24 0 22 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 NESTBOUND 1 1 .9 ?!? PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND - EASTBOUND WESTBOUND '^U -RIGHT 753 885 0 0 LEFT 31 94 0 146 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 7 21 0 124 fj USTED VOL 31 94 0 146 PACITY 0 132 0 0 MOVEMENT NO OK N/A N/A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI CORONADO 8 GULFVIEW DATE: 1987 LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 611 CRITICAL N/S VOL 591 CRITICAL E/W VOL 459 CRITICAL SUM 1050 tfffttfttttftffttffftfffffffftfffffft LANE GEOMETRY J.' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOY WIDTH ROY WIDTH I T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 2 LT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. . 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... .... ... .... ... .... ,' 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... i - TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1 0 743 0 THRU 488 288 0 0 RIGHT 0 748 r3 0 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) , PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 94 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U -RIGHT 292 591 0 0 LEFT 0 0 459 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1 0 743 0 LISTED VOL 6 0 875 0 PACITY .0 299 0 459 MOVEMENT NO OK N/A OK MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI CORONADO 8 GULFVIEW DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND fffttffffffftfffttfffftt}}}tttfffffff LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 711 CRITICAL N/S VOL 664 CRITICAL E/W VOL 560 CRITICAL SUM 1224 ftfftttfffffttftffftffftffftttttfftff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOY WIDTH ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 2 LT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 3 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... .... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES # NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUND LEFT 2 0 906 0 THRU 562 320 0 0 RIGHT 0 945 0-3 0 TRUCKS (1l LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 MESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : BO SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND JU -RIGHT 339 664 0 LEFT 0 0 560 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND UT VOLUME 2 0 906 LISTED VOL .13 0 1067 -CAPACITY 0 325 0 DEMENT NO OK NIA MESTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 560 OK WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI1 CORONADO E GULFVIEW DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 862 CRITICAL N/S VOL 784 CRITICAL E/W VOL 681 CRITICAL SUM 1471 fff?ttfftfffftffttffffffttft}{{{{}}{} LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOY WIDTH ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH I T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 2 LT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LEFT 2 0 1111 0 THRU 586 320 0 0 RIGHT 0 1058 .B 3 0 TRUCKS (2) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/N :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE.VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND U -RIGHT 354 784 0 0 LEFT 0 0 687 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND UT VOLUME 1 0 1111 0 ?..USTED VOL 13 0 1309 0 CAPACITY 0 430 0 687 VEMENT NO OK N/A OK S. 1. C. A. P. - VERSION 3. E - 2/.87 LOCATION: CORONADO i# GULR VI EW DATE z 11-109-1987 i PAGE I OF PERIOD: PM PEAK 'V'OLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME £VPH) : 2 t% 1111. D THRU VOLUME ('V"s-' H) : 586 320 s:: 0 RIGHT TURN VOL. ('V+P'•H) : 0 1058 is 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. £rPti) : 0 0 0 0 VEHICULAR 'V'OLUME £'V+PH) : 58$ 1378 1111 0 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARK I NG MANEU'V'ERS (# f H) : LANE UT I L I i AT I ON (X i OO ) ARRIVAL TYPE (XIo) : PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 1OO) : PROT. RIGHT TURNS (%)-. LOCAL BUSES (#/H),. HEAVY VEHICLES f ;? S APPROACH GRADE £?) AREA TYPE: 0 <1 0 0 100 100 i 0o I oo so 313 30 30 so 3u 90 90 15 D 0 1 1 1 D 1 i 1 0 is 0 v v NON-BUSIN ESS DISTRICT . CONTROL DATA =--=== MIN. THR'U GREEDS (SEC).- 17 t> :> c1 MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC)-. 0 0 0 t? APPROACH SPEED tMPH): 25 25 25 25 SNEAKERS £ X IO/CYCLE) : 20 20 20 20 LAPSE WIDTH #1 (FT).- 1E 1E 12 :?1 LAPSE WIDTH 02 (FT)-. 12 12 12 U LANE WIDTH #3 (FT)-. 0 LAPSE WIDTH #4 £FT) : v 0 D 0 LANE WIDTH #5 (FT).- t7 ?> cs 0 LAPSE WIDTH #6 (FT)-. 0 0 0 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: EAST-WEST PHASING: P40RTH-SOUTH PHASING: APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION NORTHBOUND 2 ALL 'MO'V'EME?STS N/S = PRETIM'ED, E/W = rRETIMED I HRU & RIGHT MOVEMENT(S) NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : TURN DESCRIPTION LEFT. SHARED, PERM. : RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS EASTBOUND a ALL MOVEMENTS WESTBOUND E ALL MOVEMENTS LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE R IG'HT % SHARE£b_ iRgRM- : LE'--T: PED. FRICTION ONLY RIGHT: NOT A PPL I CABLE : LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE : RIGHT,. iSOT APPLICABLE I S. I.C. A. P. - VERSION 3. 2 - 2f87 DATE: 11-09-1987, {PAGE 2 OF LOCATION 4 CORONA DO 1P GULF VI EW PERIOD: PM PEAK DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TA9LE SP#I SP#2 SP#3 GP#1 GP#2 Sri#3 GP#i GP#2 GP#3 GP#I GP#2 VOLUME : 0 653 13 0 153t a .3 0 i...,? '23 ,.r,? 4 0 D t:1 SAT. FLOW : i_Y 2.392 0 t Y 3154 0 0 303S D 0 tY FLOW RATIO: 0. 00 0. 2L- 0. t.}t3 D. 00 f_Y. 48 o. 013 13.00 0.41 0. 00 0. 00 0. oc, CAPACITY: 0 1487 0 t Y 1573 0 0 1268 D 0 L VOL./CAP..- 13. ". tO 0.44 0. 00 0. 130 93. 9*7 0.00 0.00 0.97 0. 00 0.00 t >. t Yt3 GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 0.0 37.8 0.0 0.0 37.8 0.0 0.0 Y 0.0 Y> .D 32.2 t.D L.t REQUIRED: 0.0 13.7 t3, 0 0, C"> 30.8 0.0 13. 0 25.0 13. 0 0.0 0.11 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC)-. 0 9 t:) t> 26 D 0 3t:Y 0 t=Y 0 QUEUE (FT): 0 74 D 13 365 0 0 315 0 0 t3 STOPS { :•t) : 0 48 0 (5 73 v V 76 t) 0 0 2 PHASE OPERATION < SEC) { ?C ) B & 3B GREEN 37.8 54.0 LOST TIME/PHASE: 3.0 SEC ES & wB GREEN 32.2 46.0 TOTAL LOST TIME z 6.0 SEC CYCLE LENGTH : 70.0 SEC ALL RED TIME: 0.0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0.89 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.97 LEFT TURN CHECK NB Sts EB WB 'JS=iLiiME PROTECTION i PPOT/ PERM) : PERMITTED CAPACITY PROTECTED CAPACITY: EXCESS LEFT TURNS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL). VEHICLES {?> NORTHBOUND 9 8.7 2.0 3.2 311 is SOUTHBOUND D 25.8 14.2 15.6 1116 81 EASTBOUND D 29.8 13..3 13.9 942 73 WESTBOUND A °?°p3 t3-tY °°t3_D ----- INTERSECTION tt - C 24.0 29.6 32. 8 2369 i 613 { UN T T VALUES: 'l; 3.010, 'x+ i.00 3+ 0.02) MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI CAUSEWAY BLVD. @ CORONADO DATE: 1987 ffttffffttffftt}}fftfffftftffffttftff LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 361 CRITICAL N/S VOL 601 CRITICAL E/W VOL 0 CRITICAL SUM 601 }fffffftffffffffffffttfffftttfffttfft LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 2 R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... { ... ... .... ... .... .... 5 ... .... . ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 629 0 0 THRU 185 'us- 0 0 RIGHT 871 0 0 O TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :3. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :3. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 60 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 11 -RIGHT 212 0 0 0 LEFT 0 389 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND UT VOLUME 0 629 0 0 'ISTED YOL 0 741 0 0 ..a'PACITY 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A l 1 MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI CAUSEWAY BLVD. 8 CORONADO DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND ftfttftfftfftftftffttffttfftffffftttt. LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 551 CRITICAL MIS VOL 912 CRITICAL E/W VOL 0 CRITICAL SUM 912 iftttftfffffttfttftffttfttfftttftttff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 L... 12.0 ... .... ... .... 2 R.. 12.0 L.. 12:0 ••. .... 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... ... 4 ... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 931 0 0 THRU 297 ti 3'7 0 0 RIGHT 1371 0 0 0 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 60 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY.MOVEMENt NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U -RIGHT 337 0 0 0 LEFT 0 575 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND JT VOLUME 0 931 0 0 LISTED YOL 0 1097 0 0 CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 KENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI CAUSEWAY BLVD. ! CORONADO DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC tfftffffff}tfftfffttfftffftttttftffff LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 571 CRITICAL N/S VOL 939 CRITICAL E/W VOL 0 CRITICAL SUM 939 ` LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 2 R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 3 T.. 12.0 ... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... ..... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 931 0 0 THRU 321 -i3zj_ 0 0 RIGHT 1476 0 0 0 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND I 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 60 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U -RIGHT 364. ' 0 0 0 LEFT . 0 575 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND . WESTBOUND C UT VOLUME 0 931 0 0 STED VOL 0 1097 0 0 CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 VEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 _ WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MARIANNE @ MANDALAY DATE: 1987 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION Sol CRITICAL N/S VOL 376 CRITICAL E/W VOL 482 CRITICAL SUN 858 }}fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOV WIDTH ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... ... .... L.. 12.0 4 ... .... .... L.. 12.0 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b ... .... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 747 THRU 232 634 0 15 RIGHT 0 1 0 539 TRUCKS (Z) LOCAL BUSES (;/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 QPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ..__U -RIGHT 139 376 0 21 LEFT 0 0 0 461 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 747 USTED VOL 0 0 0 880 JACITY 0 237 0 1374 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI .?` MARIANNE 8 MANDALAY DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND {}{}}{}}fffftfffftfffftftttffffftfttt LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 58Z CRITICAL N/S VOL 425 CRITICAL E/W VOL 564 CRITICAL SUM 989 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOY WIDTH ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 11.0 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 877 THRU 281 717 0 16 RIGHT 0 1 0 598 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 NESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND, WESTBOUND 0 -RIGHT 167 425 0 22 LEFT 0 0 0 541 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND ?JT VOLUME 0 0 0 877 JSTED VOL 0 0 0 1033 CAPACITY .0 258 0 1374 IEMENT OK OK N/A N/A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MARIANNE 8 MANDALAY DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 651 CRITICAL N/S VOL 432 CRITICAL E/W VOL 688 CRITICAL SUM 1120 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOY WIDTH MOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 1078 THRU 305 729 0 16 RIGHT 0 1 0 598 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -RIGHT 182 432 0 22 LEFT 0 0 0 666 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND T VOLUME 0 0 0 1078 STED VOL 0 0 0 1270 CAPACITY 0 250 0 1374 -'EMENT OK OK N/A N/A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/CDMMENT: SHERATON DRI MARIANNE ! POINTSETTIA DATE: 1987 . ftfttfftttftftftffffffittfftfffffffff LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 361 CRITICAL MIS VOL 174 CRITICAL E/W VOL 472 CRITICAL SUM 646 tttfffftttffffffftttffffffffftfffftff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I LT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... RT. 12.0 2 ... .... ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 .... ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 32 0 0 27 _ THRU 19 105 0 1292 RIGHT 0 47 0 96 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING NIS :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 44 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS ` CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND- SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND J -RIGHT 60 174 0 472 _EFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND "°7T VOLUME 32 0 0 27 j JSTED VOL 35 0 0 181 , PACITY 0 114 0 472 MOVEMENT NO OK OK OK WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MARIANNE 8 POINTSETTIA DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND ttttttttttttt?ttttttttttttttttttttttt . LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 411 CRITICAL N/S VOL 194 CRITICAL E/W VOL 538 CRITICAL. SUM 732 tttttftttttftttt?ttttttttttfttttttttt LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH MOY WIDTH 1 LT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... RT. 12.0 2 ... .... ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 ... .... . ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 4 .... LT. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 36 0 0 30 THRU 20 117 0 1480 RIGHT 0 53 0 109 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 - PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U -RIGHT 66 194 0 538 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IT VOLUME 36 0 0 30 JSTED VOL 40 t 0 0 102 ' CAPACITY 0 128 0 538 DEMENT NO OK OK OK MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MARIANNE 8 POINTSETTIA DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC ftifitfftfft#fttfffftfffftftfftftttt LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 441 CRITICAL N/S VOL 194 CRITICAL E/W VOL 600 CRITICAL SUM 794 fftfffftffffftttffftfftttfttfftffifft LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH ROY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 LT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ... .... RT. 12.0 1 ... .... ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 36 0 0 30 THRU 20 117 0 1681 RIGHT 0 . 53 0 109 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND I 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUNO 1 -RIGHT 66 194 0 600 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IT VOLUME 36 0 0 30 IJSTED VOL 40 0 0 102 CAPACITY 0 128 0 600 " ?EMENT ND OK OK OK MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MEMORIAL 8 ISLAND MAY DATE: 1987 LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION . 711 CRITICAL N/S VOL 443 CRITICAL E/W VOL 722 CRITICAL SUM 1165 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE Nov WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 ... .... R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 5 ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EFT 0 376 180 0 THRU 0 0 1102 862 RIGHT 0 145 0 251 TRUCKS (i) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 0. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 60 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 'HRU -RIGHT 0 0 651 510 'FT 0 443 212 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IT VOLUME 0 376 160 0 +DJ"STED VOL 0 443 212 0 ICITY 0 128 141 71 cMENT N/A N/A N/A OK MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MEMORIAL ! ISLAND WAY DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 80% CRITICAL N/S VOL 492 CRITICAL E/W VOL 829 CRITICAL SUN 1321 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 ... .... R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 4 ... ...• ... .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .. ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LEFT 0 418 200 0 THRU 0 0 1302 1005 IGHT 0 161 0 278 TRUCKS (Z) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 0. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND RIGHT 0 0 769 _FT 0 492 235 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NP°T VOLUME- 0 418 200 I TED VOL 0 492 235 RCITY _ 0 128 175 MOVEMENT N/A N/A NIA WESTBOUND 594 0 WESTBOUND 0 60 OK 1 i WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI MEMORIAL 8 ISLAND WAY DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 871 CRITICAL N/S VOL 492 CRITICAL E/W VOL 947 CRITICAL SUM 1439 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 418 200 0 THRU 0 0 1383 1206 RIGHT 0 161 0 278 TRUCKS (i) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) E/N :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 0. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND. WESTBOUND -RIGHT 0 0 817 712 l..=FT 0 492 235 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND i IIACITY T VOLUME 0 418 200 0 I iTED VOL 0 492- 235 0 0 128 105 130 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK P. '- 'VrE RS ii_ 4 -3. .:: - i_f:a Y Ltl T . . i.1'?_.11?i •t PA3E I L ut..t-rT iuf4: r MLil'C.LfYL .. 1. .7L-40 WMf rc ftlUiJ: i-ff PEAK 1997 TOTAL "I-RAFF. VOLUMES -4viRTf'r4 `Jo'u' •, A 'G i AS T WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME t'V PH i : 0 416 200 13 THRU VOLUME 0 k.% 1383 1206 RIGHT TURN ' . £Vrr ) '-.H) VOL. 161 - 0 278 PEDESTRIAN VOL. £PP'H) 0 0 'V'EHICULAR VOLUME £'V PH) : t3 579 1583 1484 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARS{ I NG MANEUVERS (#/ H) : 0 0 0 0 LANE UTILItATION£X100) 1k3C% 100 100 100 ARRIVAL TYPE £ X i O3 : 30 30 30 30 PEAK HOUR F ACTOR £ X 100) : 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS (A): 0 43 43 0 LOCAL BUSES 1 1 1 i HEAVY VEHICLES (%).- 1 i 1 1 APPROACH GRADE ("'0z V 0 0 U AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT COt4TROL DATA MIN* THRU 13nEEP4 (SEC) : 0 0 0 O PIPS. LEFT GREEN (SEC): 0 :u 0 0 APPROACH SPEED (YMPH) : as 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (X 1O/CYCLE) : 20 ?V 20 210 LANE WIDTH #1 (F T) : s3 1E iL 12 LA74E WIDTH #2 .,.FT).* L% 12 12 .12 LANE WIDTH #3 (FT ) : 0 13 1 E 12 LANE WIDTH ##4 £ FT) : 0 0 0 0 ?. LANE WIDTH #5 (FT) : 0 0 0 0 LAPSE WIDTH 00 (F'()-. 0 0 D D CONTROLLER TYPE: P4/S = PRETIMED, E/W PRETIMED OPPOS I NG VOLUME COMP OS I T 1064: THRU & R's GH r' MOVEMENT(S) EAST-WEST PHASING: EB LEFT PROTECTED NORTH-SOUTH r^-HASING% NEITHER TURPS PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION 11 TURN DESCRIPTION LEFT-. P40T APPLICABLE NORTHBOUND a ALL MOVEMENTS RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE s LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONLY SOUTHBOUND := T'HRUS ONLY 3 RIGHTS ONLY S RIGHT: EXCLUSI'V'E, PERM. 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEF'T': EXCLUSIVE, PROT. EASTBOUND a THRUS ONLY RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE LEFT : NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND a THRUS ONLY 3 RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE PERM , . DEMAND LCJ t. rf i t CJ1V'.' iEl?(1 f?il'?t +A t.:.7L'rf:Yu ?iYA•? TABLE Gp# t ? ? G P # N. f! t'fr ? sir#:3 v.-•t# 1 ;:r#2 VOLUME: 0 0 464 SAT. FLOW: £> 0 0 Q 1523 FLOW RATIO: f:), fSx^_. x'), 00 £), O 0.01-1 13. 30 CAPACITY: f) £3 ) ) 486 VOL. /CAP. : £>. 00 0.. 00 £:). 00 0. 00 £:). 95 GREEN TIME/MOVEMEN i ?SEC) AVAILABLE: 0. £J £a. ) 0. 0 0. t % 22. REQUIRED: V.I. £a 0. 0 £>, 10 0. £3 16.5 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY ISEC): U 0 0 0 37 QUEUE (FT): 0 £3 £? O 222 STOPS (: : V £) 0 0 92 3 PHASE OPERATION fSEC) (%) NB & SB GREEN 22.2 37.0 EB THRU & LEFT 1.11.2 18.7 EB & WS THRU 26.6 44.3 LEFT TURPS CHECK VOLUME: PROTECTION tPROT/PERM) : PERMITTED CAPACITY: PROTECTED CAPACITY: EXCESS LEFT TURNS: ALL RED TIME t 0.0 SEC FLOW RAT A. O: t). 81 DEGREE OF SAT.,. -.13.35 DATE: (r3f-Yt?c_ i E % OF 'j F CZ PERIOD: rr•`M PEAK 1'397 TOTAL TPAFF. EAS i r± WEST' Jh%'f'3 33 r# 1 'v"r`,;2 Gp#3 rierY'# I 8P#2 t i 79 222 1537 0 0 1340 1 5 1 5 171:,,2 357-6 L) 0 `' 3..,8.E 1 0. 12 0.13 0.43 0. Q£_) 0. 00 0.37 f 486 33 2074 0 10 1408 x:). 37 £J. 95 0. 74 0.043 0.00 1-1.95 t-' 22.2 11.2 37.8 0.0 0.0 26.1.6 7.0 8.4 26.6 £1. £> n.. 0 23.3 1 12 53 J V 0 24 44 133 I62 0 0 233 55 3v 46 0 V 72 _OST TIME/r-`Hi-(jE': 3.0 SEC TOTAL LOST TIME t 9. 13 SEC CYCLE LENGTH: 60.0 SEC NB SB EB 222 PROT 0 x:33 D WB SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH a E RV I CE (SEC) t HRS) i GAL) VEHICLES 1$) PSORTHBOUND A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 V SOUTHBOUND D 29.8 6.9 7.2 476 37 EASTBOUND B 13.7 8.7 12.0 904 55 WESTBOUND C 21.6 12.3 14.8 2 120 76 INTERSECTION C 19. 5 28.5 33.0 ----- 2499 2 68' (UNIT VALUES : $ 3.00 3+ 1. 00 ?+ 0.02) WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI BELLEAIR CSY 8 GULF BLVD DATE: 1987 }}fffffffffffff}fffffffffffffffffffff LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 581 CRITICAL N/S VOL 482 CRITICAL E/V VOL 476 CRITICAL SUM 958 ffff}}ffffffffffffffffffffffffffiffff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 l.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 12.0 4 .. ... .... .. .... .. ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 245 0 404 THRU 169 240 0 0 ' RIGHT 247 0 0 379 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL.BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND - SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U -RIGHT 194 273 0 0 EFT 0 288 - 0 476 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 245 0 404 L STED VOL 0 288 0 476 ACITY 109 79 0 0 MOVEMENT OK N/A N/A N/A MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAMEICOMMENT: SHERATON DRI BELLEAIR CSY 8 GULF BLVD DATE:. 1997 BACKGROUND ifttttftffitffttfttfffffffffffttttfft LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 741 CRITICAL NIS VOL 691 CRITICAL E/W VOL 529 CRITICAL SUM 1220 tfffttfffffttfftttttfftffffftttttffff ? LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOY WIDTH ROY WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 1 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .... L.. 12.0 3 ... .... .... ... .... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ! 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUND LEFT , 0 314 0 449 THRU 283 326 0 0 RIGHT 274 0 0 490 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES t#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING MIS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 49 (PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' U -RIGHT 322 370 0 0 LEFT 0. 369 0 529 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ?UT VOLUME 0 314 0 449 USTED VOL 0 369 0 529 CAPACITY 321 48 0 0 DEMENT OK N/A N/A N/A MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS BELLEAIR CSY FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI ?DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC fffffffffffff}}ffffffffffffffffffffff LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION Sol CRITICAL N/S VOL 786 CRITICAL E/W VOL 529 CRITICAL SUM 1315 ffffffffifffffiffffffffffffffffffffff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .... L.. 12.0 3 ... .... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 335 0 449. THRU 346 461 0 0 ' RIGHT 274 0 0 502 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (t/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/N :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I -RIGHT 392 521 0 0 LEFT 0 394 0 529 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND IT VOLUME 0 335 0 449 JTED VOL 0 394 0 519 CAPACITY 265 129 0 0 EMENT OK N/A N/A N/A S. 1. C. A. P. - 'V'ERS iON 3.2 - 2/87 DATE: 11-09-1987 i PAGE 1 Off: LOCAT I ON : GULF BL'V+D. sv- SELLEA I R CS'! PER I tai! : . PM PEAK 1997 TOTAL TRAFf: VOLUMES -=--------=-=-- NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME i VPH) : 111 335 0 443 THR'U VOLUME ('V{PH) : 346 461 0 0 RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH) : 274 0 0 5112 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH): 0 is 0 0 VEHICULAR VOLUME i'V' FH) : 620 796 0 351. DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEU'V'ERS (#!H) : 0 0 0 0 LANE U ILIZATICASiX100) : i0o 100 100 100 ARRIVAL TYPE (XIO) : 30 30 30 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X IOO) : 90 Sv 30 so PROT. RIGHT TURNS (%);: E3 FJ D 0 LOCAL BUSES (#/H),. 1 1 1 1 HEAVY VEHICLES (x): 1 1 i 1 APPROACH GRADE ('A)-. v 0 u 0 AREA TYPE z NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA =-=-------- ------ -_-__--_-- --=_=_-_=- MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC) : t3 0 .0 0 MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC> : i) 0 0 0 APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 25 2t; E5 25 SNEAKERS (X IO/CYCLE) : 20 v 20 20 LANE WIDTH #1 (FT): 12 12 0 is LANE WIDTH #e (FT): 12 12 0 1 LANE WIDTH #3 (FT) : 01 0 0 LANE WIDTH #4 (FT)-. O v 0 0 LANE WIDTH #5 (FT) : 0 to 0 0 LANE WIDTH 06 (FT)". 0 v v 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = PRET I MED, E/ W = PRET I MED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU & RIGHT MO V'EMENT i S ) EAST-WEST PHASING.- NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTH-SOUTH PHASING: Sb LE FT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION TURN DESCRIPTION LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE AAPPLICABLE NORTHBOUND 2- THRUS ONLY 3 RIGHTS ONLY t RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. i LEFTS ONLY LEFT: EXCLUSI'V'E, PROT. SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT % NOT APPLICABLE LEFT : NOT APPLICABLE EASTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE i LEFT: rtD. r CTI . i tom}. rv ONLY P ED. v t WESTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 3 RIGHTS ONLY i RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S. 1. C. A. P. - 'V'ERS ION 3. 2 - 2/8 7 DATE: 1 1 -OS-2387 (PAGE ' 2. OF LOCATION z GULF BLVD. @ BELLEA I R CSY PERIOD: PM PEAK 1337 TOTAL ' TRAF DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP#•i GP#2 uP#3 GPOIL G P#2 GP#3 4i' #j- G'P•#2 c^ari#k3 GP#1 CieP#` VOLUME: 0 384 304 372 512 10 s> fl 0 0 493 SAT. FLOW: 0 1732 1516 4702 1764 v 0 0 V U 1523 FLOW RATIO: 0.00 0.21A. 0-20 cl. 22 0.29 ice. sots 13.011 13.1-10 0.00 0.01) 0.33 CAPACITY: . D 418 354 405 318 t) 0 0 0 V 609 VOL./CAP.: 0.00 0.32 0. 8E 0,. 32 0.56 0. 0•3 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.82 GREEN TIME / i' O V'EMEINT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 0. t) 13. 3 19. Z3 13. 7 33. -0 0. f:) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3i 0 REQUIRED: 0. 0 16. 0 12.8 15. 5 20.3 ?^, . s? f"'.0 , 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.- 4 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY iSEC) : 0 38 33 36 3 u V J J U 20 QUEUE (FT): 0 200 13S i33 122 0 s5 s1 0 0 171 STOPS 0 82 78 82 43 0 0 0 V 0 - 67 3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) i%) SB THRU & LEFT 13.7 28.1 LOST TIME/PHASE: 3.0 SEC. NB & SB THRU 13.3 27. 6 TOTAL LOST TIME; 3. 11 SEC EB & Ws GREEN 31.0 44.3 CYCLE LENGTH: 70.0 SEC ALL RED TIME: 0. 0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0.80 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.92 LEF7.7 TURN CHECK N8 SB EB QB VOLUME : 372 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): TROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: 0 PROTECTED CAPACITY: 465 EXCESS LEFT TURNS: 0 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) i'HRS) (GAL) 'V'EHICLES i 3+ > NORTHBOUND D 35.6 8.3 8.8 554 .46 SOUTHBOUND C 21.5 6.3 7.7 558 .33 (EASTBOUND A 0.0 -). v 0.0 0 t) WESTBOUND C 24.3 3.5 10.5 758 54 ----- INTERSECTION D 26.6 25.2 2 7. C3 2870 1410 (UN I T VALUES : ? . 00 ? 1 . v o ? t). 02 ) WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI WALSINGHAM @ GULF BLVD DATE: 1987 ftfftf#fftffftfffffffftttffffftffftf ' LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 661 CRITICAL N/S VOL 666 CRITICAL E/W VOL 400 CRITICAL SUM 1086 fftfft}{{{}}fffiftffffftffffffffftfff LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH NOY WIDTH ! I R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0. .... L.. 12.0 ! 3 ... :... ... ..:. ... .... ... .... 4 .. ... ... ... .... ... .... ! 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ! LEFT 0 317 0 340 THRU 275 297 0 0 RIGHT 239 0 0 491 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (1/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 ' WESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0- 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -RIGHT 313 337 0 0 EFT 0 373 0 400 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INNIT VOLUME 0 317 0 340 I STED VOL 0 373 0 400 rACITY 349 24 0 0 MOVEMENT OK NIA N/A N/A ?I - MADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI WALSINGHAM E GULF BLVD DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND ' tttttttfttfttttttft#ffi?ttttfftititf LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 781 CRITICAL N/S VOL 845 CRITICAL E/W VOL 445 CRITICAL SUM 1290 ttt?ttt?ttttt{tft?t?t{ttttttt?t?tt?t LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE ROY WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOY WIDTH ROY WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 12.0 3 ... ... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 386 0 376 THRU 345 354 0 0 ' RIGHT 265 0 0 601 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (1/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 MESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED ' E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS 1 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND J -RIGHT 391 401 0 0 LEFT 0 454 0 445 LEFT TARN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1T VOLUME 0 386 0 378 '.JSTED VOL 0 454 0 445 CAPACITY 444 10 0 0 IEMENT OK N/A N/A N/A WADE TRIM INC CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI WALSINGHAM @ GULF BLVD DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC ' ffftffttttttfffffttftfftttt}}{ttttftt ' LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION Box CRITICAL N/S VOL 870 CRITICAL E/W VOL 445 CRITICAL SUM 1315 fffftfftfttfftfffftttftffftftftt}{}}} LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T:: 11.0 L:: 11:0 ... .... L.. 12.0 3 .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ..... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 407 0 378 THRU 345 468 0 0 ' RIGHT 265 0 0 628 TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (t/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 ' NESTBOUND 1 1 .9 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED ' E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -RIGHT 391 529 0 0 LEFT 0 479 0 445 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I T VOLUME 0 407 0 378 STED VOL 0 479 0 445 CAPACITY 341 138 0 0 EMENT OK N/A N/A N/A S. IL. C. A. P. - `v'ERS TOPS 3. 2 - 2/67 DATE: 1&1-09-1987 1 PAGE 1 OF LOCATION: WALS I NGHAM @ CiULF BLVD P ER i OD : PM PEAK 1 S97 TOTAL TRAFF 'V'OLUMES ==-==-=?-==--?- NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME (V PH) : iZ 407 ; i> 373 THRU VOLUME i'vrPH) : 345 468 0 0 RIGHT TURN VOL. (V PH) : iG5 F} 0 628 PEDESTRIAN VOL. iPPHS : c. 0 0 0 VEHICULAR VOLUME (V PH) : 610 875 D 1006 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEUVERS (# f H) : 0 0 0 D LANE UTILIZAi ION(X100) 100 100 100 loo, ARRIVAL TYPE ( X 1 30 3iJ 30 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 100) : 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS (%) : 0 0 O 0 LOCAL BUSES <-*/H) 1 1 1 1 HEAVY VEHICLES (%)- 1 1 1 1 APPROACH GRADE (•x) : 0 0 V 0 AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT [?. CONTROL DATA ?--C??.??-?.? --? - ?- -------- ?--?.-- ----? - MIN. THRU GREEDS (SEC) 0 0 6 MIN. LEFT GREEDS (SEC): V 0 0 0 APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 2m 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (X 1 O/CYCLE) : 20 2J 20 20 LAPSE WIDTH #1 (FT) : 12 12 0 12 LAPSE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 12 c. 12 LAPSE WIDTH #3 (FT).- 0 0 0 LANE WIDTH 04 (FT): 0 0 0 0 LAPSE WIDTH 05 (FT).- 0 %D 0 p LAPSE WIDTH #6 ? FT > : 0 0 V 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: PSIS = ACTUATED, E/ W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU MOVEMENTF i S) EAST-WEST PHAS I PSG : NEITHER TURN PROTEC TED NORTH-SOUTH PHrAS I PSG : SB LE FT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION U-(N DESC RIPTION LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE NORTHBOUND a THRUS ONLY 3 RIGHTS ONLY RIGHT: EXC LUSIVE, PERM. LEFTS ONLY S LEFT: EXCL USIVE, PROT. SOUTHBOUND 2. THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE t LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE Ema?rSLiL3Nz 2 ALL MOVEMENTS i RIGHT: NOT -APPLICABLE LEFT: PED. FR ICT ION ONLY 'wESTBt3UtSD 2 THR'US ONLY 3 RIGHTS 'urvLY rfiGr4r EXC LUSIVE, PERM. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S. I . C. A. P. - VERS ION 3. 2 - 2/87 DATE : 1 J. -09-1967 (PAGE 2 OF LOCATION: WALS I NGHAM s? GULF BLVD PERIOD: PM PEAK 1337 TOTAL TR€3f= F DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP# 1 GP##2 GP*3 GP# f GP#2 GP#3 SPO I GP#2 GP#3 GP## l GP#2 VOLUME: 10 383 294 452 5?0 0 0- *3 0 0 420 SA'C'. FLOW: D 1792 1516 1702 1764 0 0 0 0 0 1523 FLOW RATIO: 1.. i>0 0.21 0.19 0.27 0.29 0.00 0. 00 ti. i7O 0. CJ13 0. 00 0. 28 CAPACITY: 0 371 314 436 632 0 D 0 0 0 678 'VOL. /CAP.: 0.00 1.03 0.94 1.03 0.59 0. t30 0. 0- 0 0. 1011. 0. 0.0 0.1-10 0.62 GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT <SEC ) AVAILABLE% 0.0 23.7 23.7 26. 7=2. =i 0. 0 0. is 0. Q 0.0 0. 0 47.6 REQUIRED: 0.0 22.3 17.4 26.1 29.3 0. 0 0.: } 0. t0 0.11 0. <l 24. 3 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC> : 0 64 46 71 12 0 0 is ?Z to .14 QUEUE . (FT) : 0 336 212 383 18.51 01 it 0 0 0 156 ST,1PS % A> : 0 100 87 100 JJ <.> 0 0 0 0 59 3 'C'HASE OPERATION <SEC) t%) 99 THRU & LEFT 2$. 7 28.7 LOST TIME/ F'HASE : 3. 0 SEC N9 & 98 THRU 23.7 23.7 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC E$ & WS GREEN 47.6 47.6 CYCLE LENG T H : 1'DO. 0 SEC ALL RED TIME z 1-1.0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0.94 DEGREE OF SAT.: 1.03 LEFT TURN CHECK( VOLUME : PROTECTION (PROT/PERM) PERMITTED CAPACITY: PROTECTED CAPACITY: EXCESS LEFT TURNS: NB S B 452 PROT 0 436 14 EP Wb SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY APPROACH SERVICE tSEC) NORTHBOUND E 56.4 SOUTHBOUND D 33.3 EASTBOUND A 0.0 WESTBOUND D 35.5 INTERSECTION E 4 l.3 i UN I T VALUES : DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES t?> 13.8 12.3 636 66 13.8 12.9 739 69 0.0 0.0 0 .0 14.3 14.6 947 76 41.9 33.8 2324 ----- 212 $ 3. $30 $ 1. 010 $ 0.02) ?j Table 14 RECOMMENDED BASE CAPACITIES (•2501000 < Populatio n < 750,000) UTPS HOURLY INTERSECTION CAPACIT IES IN VEHICLES/SOUR/LANE A 1 rea Tvoe : CBD Lanes 1 2 3 .4 5 6 One Dir FWY DIV. ART ART COLL LOCAL ONE-WAY 1 1 1. 560 460 10,000 650 t 2 1900 670 ••540 430 10,000 660 3 '1900 .700 560 450 10,000 670 4 5 1900 1900 730 1 560 1 1 1 10,000 10 000 690 , 1 Area T ype 2: Fringe ' 1 t 1 710 570 16,000 670 2 1900 - 840 680 540 * 10,000 680 1 3 1 9b0 870 700 560 10,000 690 4 1900 910 700 1 10,000 710 5 1900 1 1 1 10,000 1 Area Tvoe 3: Residential 1 1 1 710 570 101,000 780 2 1900 840 680 540 10,000• 790 3 1900• 870 700 560 10,000 820 4 1900 910 700 1 100,000 840 5 1900 1 1 ' 1' 10,000 1 ' Area Type 4: OBD 1 1 1 710 570 10,000 '740 2 1900 840 .680 540 10,000 '750 3 1900 870 700 560 10,000 760 4 1900 910 700 1 10,000 800 ' 5 1900 1 1 •1 10,000 1 Area T ype 5:.Rural ' 1 1 1 580 , 470 10,000 780 2 11 1900 700 560 450 10,000 790 3 I 4 1900 1900 720 730 600 700 1 •1 10f000 10,000 820 840 5 1900, 1 1 1 10,000 1