The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2006-07043:~: ~~ o ~ ~ Planning Department ~~ ~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue r, L ~ C arwate Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~~ ~~ Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562 X865 .; SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ~ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 475.00 CASE #: I ~ ~ Z~ " y 1 ~T :.J RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ~ I DATE RECEIVED: rI ~ 1 ~ I r`~t'n * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Joseph Murphy MAILING ADDRESS: 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD PHONE NUMBER 716-372-2853 CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OtNNER(S): LEO J JR. MURPHY, JOSEPH P MURPHY List ALL owners on the deed MICHAEL V MURPHY CHARLOTTE A MURPHY AGENT NAME: Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. (Sandra Owens) MAILING ADDRESS: 1118 South FIOrlda Avenue, Lakeland, Florida 33803 PHONE NUMBER: 8632-1500 FAX NUMBER: $53~ CELL NUMBER EMAIL ADDRESS: c~nrlr~ PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ PROPOSED USE(S): 1 .OPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Bank Atlantic PROJECT VALUATION: $ 700,000 18-29-16-00000-130-0910 & 18-29-16-00000-130-1000 0.96 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 41,970 sq. ft. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: OUr Slte Cannot meet the Frontage buffer regUlrementS due t0 the Wldth Of the Slte and Specfically identify the request (include number of units or square the fact that we have (3) frontages therefore we request the city planning manager allow footage of nonresidential use and all us to meet the minimum buffer requirements for development as set forth in the City of requested code deviations; e.g. Clearwater Land Development Code Section 3-1202.D.1 reduction in required number of . a parking spaces, specific use, etc.) __ Page I of7 ~~~ i ~-t Z006 PLANNINGl DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (iDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NOQ/ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) SUBMff A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see Page ~) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA-Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is logted. It is the interest of the proposed project to maintain harmony with its surroundings. We are proposing a building that respects the structural _scaleshatp.redominates_inshe_envar~nmentin..which~tisJocate~.~N.e_acknovde~ige.and~pFreciate~battbe~o~zontaLnther~han_tbe~~r3ical_ design of the city is what prevails and we must value this setting. That is why we are choosing to recommend the use of a bank at this location, sewiagas_emb@IIISt1fII@rlt fnr fhic higbly~yelg~pWeY~and_adding.abllitding.ttlatltOeSAOLOYEONhPIm thra~UI7ALnd1Ag_StglCtUreS,~Mtt1_ designed green areas, a more attractive site Viangle and with the primary interest that this bank may be of good use to the people of Clearwater end..tbelesidents_immediately~ocafed h~thicTwpeiiy 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The Bank has a very upscale appearance, using neutral colors, "marble finish" and barrel the at each tower. Enhanced landscaping is also proposed. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use is a new Bank Atlantic facility. Bank Atlantic will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the area due to the nature of the business, they will instead offer convenience to persons living or working in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Bank Atlantic is open 7 days a week 9 am to 9 pm this eliminates the need to "rush" to the bank. Our site has been designed to optimize traffic flow and will have on site directional signage. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed project is surrounded on its West side by a Commercial/Retail building, on its South and East st es y major an we nown to as ruc ure as I Is u o ay v an oac man roa an u er more y commercial/ retail properties such as Home Depot and on the rear by a residential community This development is consistent with the commercial character that prevails on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and respects the calm nature -of-the-residential-area-that-it-adici 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and offactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The nature of the proposed business does not create a lot of noise. The building has been designed to be visually pleasing and inviting, in addition, this site will have substantial landscaping to soften the impact of parking, drive isles and the building itself. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page2of7 .i'~~ 1 ~ ~~06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) Q/ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the spedfic Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested {use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL Manual and 4202.A.21) of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modficafion of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormvater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearvvater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^/ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and munidpal stone systems; Proposed stormwater detenfioNretention area including top of bank, tce of slope and outlet control structure; ~/ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ~/ Proposed stormwater detenfioNretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ~/ Signature and seal of Fbrida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit),rf appligble ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; U TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by spedes, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing Dees; On SUNey TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY', of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; See Landscape Plan 0/ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^/ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall Ge approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering prindples. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Trip Generation Report Enclosed GRADING PLAN, as applipble; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applipble; Unity of Title Enclosed ORIGINAL Page3of7 J6J~ 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '~ G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Q Index sheet referencng individual sheets included in package; Q North arrow; Q Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; /0 All dimensions; 0 Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; DEMO PLAN Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Q All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; Q All required sight triangles; N/A Identifiption of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specmen trees, inducting i d i d l i f escr pt on an ocat on o understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public an d private easements; Q Location of all street rights-of~vay within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, inducting fire hydrants, stone and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas 0 and water tines; 0 All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Q Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycing or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening Q {per Sek~ion 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; p Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stomrwater management faalities; p Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Q Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Q SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writteNtabular f orm: EXISTING REQUIRED 41 970 sq.. and p~~pO.~ED 41,970 sq~f: and ~ , Land area in uare feet and acres; sq ,Q,gF'+ arrec 0.96 acres Q Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 1 N/q Q Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Q Gross floor area devoted to each use; 4100 sq. ft. Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the aces; N/A 17 REQ. number of re uired s 30 PROPOSED- SE SIT q p E E PLAN Q Total paved area, including all paved panting spaces & driveways, 18,333.74 or 43.70% 80% expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; 24,364.10 SO. FT. 513°!° OF 41TF Offical records book and page numbers of all existing utility N/A 0 easement; Q Building and structure heights; Unknown 34' Impermeable surtace ratio (I.S.R.); and 43.70% 67.85% 0 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0.09 ^ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/x X 11); Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRD provide the following additional information on site plan: NSA ~j` One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ~ Q All open space areas; Q/ Location of atl earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; 0 Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); 0 Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural ovefiangs; ORIGINAL Page4of7 ~UL 14 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER b, H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A) ^~ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Q All existing and proposed structures; 0 Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ~ fight visibility triangles; Q Delineation and dimensions of all partcing areas including Landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees onJsite and immediately adjacent to the site, by spades, size and locations, including driplines (as indigted on required Q tree SUNey); n Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, spedfications, quantities, and sparing requirements of all Q existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typigl planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, baddilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and Q percentage covered; NIA Conditions of a previous devebpment approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); 0 Irrigation notes. Q REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape assodated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas when: minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Q BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: 0 All sides of all buildings; Q Dimensions; 0 Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and Q Materials. REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. A'/ ^~ All R20POSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as appligble (separate application and fee required). Q Reduced signage proposal (8'/s X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECENED Page5of7 ~Ul~ 14 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER .` ~. K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4801.C) ^ Indude if required by the Traffic Operations Manager orhis/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Departments Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acmowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is inducted. The study must Indude a summary table of pre- and pos4developmenttevels of service for all roadway legs and each fuming movement at all intersections identified in the Sceping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, oontad the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. Trip Generation Report Provided L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pumps required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capadty. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to Indude NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ^ Acknowledgement offire flow calculations/watersfudy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. ~_ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, adcnowtedge that all representations made in this appliption an; true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described ip this application. tgnature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this /o _y'`day of c~4'<<f , A.D._20 to me and/or by oFi is personally known produced as identfi lion. ~ ' ~~ Notary public, `~ My commission expires: ~ ~~ ~~ RECEIVED °~:r.'.'•-,,, CONNIEGILL ~~ ~;: MY COMMISSION # DD 417377 ,~~.~~ 1 4 2~~6 Page6of7 ~~~~ EXPIRES: Aprillt,2009 F° h ~ Bonded ThN Notary PWNc UtMatwriters PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,., ~ • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all properly owners on deed -PRINT full names: JC~~~~I~ ~ ~ P . : ,L cZPHY CHARLOTTE A . MURPH•Y_ LEO J. MURPHY, JR. CHARLOTTE Y. I~:URPHY 2. That (I am~we are) the owners} and record title holder(s) of the following described properly (address or general location): 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Clearwtar, Florida 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Sandra Owens; Wanda Fabre; Yohansi Santana; Marsha Mtxollam as {his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavft has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. Th t (i/we), the undersi n d autho " her by certify that the foregoing is true and correct. c [J,z,J Property Owner Property ne ~,t, a..~-~,y . h-c~-u-13•dw C~ ct Property er Property Owner STATE OF~~~~~~; NEW YORK COUNTY OF X ALLE GANY New York , Before me the undersigned, an officer duy commissioned by the laws of the State of f~IdB, on this 3 0th ~ of June Charlotte Y. Murphy, h C ar o Myurphy personally appeared ~~~•~.= -- ~ • '~'Urphy who having been first duly sworn eon : Pturp~Jr . ~eposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. QUac~ ~: ' . •.i4^` ray ~•;~tr~ Myy C.,ry~~•ir••~;r (:?^,r~~ i'', Z6c~- Notary Public ignatu Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Facpires: 3 ~~ ~~~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '. 00 6 • ~ N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of ail property owners on deed - PRINT full names: t:'.ICI~.AEL V. ;tiiURPHY 2. That (I arrlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Clearwtar, Florida 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Sandra ovens; Wanda Fabre; Yohansi Santana; Marsha Mccollam as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 8. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~~ ~~ Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, couNTYOs Volusia B ore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~~~ day of personally appeared = ~ i chae 1 V . ~':_urphy who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Pn~x~-tea r(., (~CC9-~~J -~ I'~ cal m -~5- ~-~ -3 ~,~y~ro~~ SUSAN M. URIBE /~~ ~ ~> w ~ MY COMMISSION # DD 324415 ~/`-'~~~~ J~ ~ ~ ~~'OF~~P EXPIRES: June 29, 2008 - 1.8003-NOTARV Fl: No Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/ tery Discount Assoc. co. fNy Commission Expires: ~~ _ ~ ~' . OS' ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~UJL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r • IIi~IJRPFIY AND IIAl1RPHY, 19.~~ ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW JOSEPH P. MURPHY 208 NORTH CLINTON STREET ALSO ADMITTED TO GLEAN, NEW YORK 14760 PRACTICE IN FLORIDA (716) 372-2853 June 28, 2006 Sandra Owens, President Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803 Re: BankAtlantic Murphy Ground Lease 2498 Gulf to Bay Clearwater, F1 Dear Ms. Owens: CUBA OFFICE P.O. BOX 5 CUBA, NY 14727 This letter is to authorize Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. and its agents (Sandra Owens, Wanda Fabre, Marsh McCollam or Yohansi Santana) to act as authorized representatives for Murphy and Murphy, P.C. for the purpose of obtaining all necessary permits and approvals for the Bank Atlantic proposed building and construction on the property owned by the Murphys located at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, also know as Tax Parcel No. 18/29/16/00000/130/1000 and Tax Parcel No. 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 in Clearwater, Florida. This authorization grants Sandra Owens, President, permission to sign all permit applications for all municipal, county, state and governmental authorities requiring permits in this construction matter. Respectfully, J eph Murphy Mu phy and Murphy, P.C. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1118 SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE ~~ ~~, LAKELAND, FLORIDA 33803 OLUITONS, INC 863-802-1500 PHONE 863-802-1505 FAX LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL T°~ City of Clearwater Job# 6009 °~e~ 7-12-2006 Plannin De artment _ 100 South Myrtle Avenue Attention: Site Development Clearwater, Florida 33756 Pn°ne: 727-562-4865 RE. Bank Atlantic -Clearwater We are sending you: ®Attached Via HD ^ Shop Drawings ^ Prints ^ Plans Co ies Date Number Descri tion 1 Original Si ned and Notarized A plication 14 Co ies of Si ned A lication 15 S/S Sets of Plans 1 24 x 36 Colored Elevation 1 Ori final Si ned Com rehensive Si n A lication 14 Co ies of Com rehensive Si n A lication 15 Co ies of Tri Generation Re ort 15 Letter of Authorization and Uni of Title 15 Pro'ect Narrative 1 Check # `q ~, s for,, u~ S, op and Check # 9 a for~3~ These are transmitted as checked below: ® For Approval ^ Approved as submitted ^Other ^ For your use ^ Approved as noted ^ For bid use Remarks: Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Copy to: File '~ ' , Signed: Sandra Owens ,, ~; , All above information received by: Date: IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, PLEASE ADVISE US IMMEDIATELY ~~ _. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~IJL 1 ~ 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. City of Clearwater ~ ~ 7/13/2006 Flexible Standard Dev. Appl. Fee 0925 475.00 Suntrust Household A Flexible Standard Dev. Appl Fee 475.00 S~,AL~ ,tl;. ~ T Line Items: Case No Receipt #: 1200600000000007204 Date: 07/14/2006 7/ 14/2006 3:01:45PM Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLS2006-07043 03 Flex Std-Commercial 010-341262 475.00 Line Item Total: $475.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check COMM DEV SOL INC RD_ 0925 w ~ ® w ~ Q ~ N ~ Q Z ~ V O V O~ .J ~ zo z~ aU In Person 475.00 Payment Total: $475.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.tpt • e7i~C 831 FLS2006-07043 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD Date Received: 07/14/2006 BANK ATLANTIC ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 ZONING DISTRICT: C PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 290B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet ;y4 i~~~~'c7f I X!! ~ v ,,,....,, (~f '~1~4,1 ~ ~ , . ~ : ~~; ~'Q ,• ~ ~j~~~~G~e -1V~ LONG RANGE PIA:NNING DEVI:LOPMENI' RI:vIr:W January 29, 2007 Sandra Owens • ~~T'Y O~ ~LEA~W.P~`I~"ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos~r OEEICI: Box 4748, CLEAItWA'['ER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES I3llll.ntN'G, 100 SOU'fli MYRTLE Avr:NUE, CLEARWA'f'ER, FLORIDA 33756 'fliLriPLloNli (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-07043 at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Ms. Owens: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E. of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to. the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. The DRC recommended approval of the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Ap rp oval: 1. The proposal complies with the Offices criteria under provisions of Section 2-703.I.; 2. The plan complies with the General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913;,and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Ap royal: 1. That all Engineering conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That all Environmental conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That all Fire conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That all Land Resource conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 5. That all Stormwater conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 6. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FIS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Gulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -Approved\Gulf to Bay 249~,i~:~~.y~~4~~g~t. Q~I~gI~I~oc ~c>ttn l~orn~, Cctr:nc:n.,wt.~nsitr. LIc»'r ti:»nirc~~, Ccx.~Cn.>n:>nsr:r 13n.i. Jc~asux, Cot ncu.ancatise~c Cnri.i:x A. Prn:rse~. Cen:uai.>u;>nter. "I?c~uni. I%RU't.<IVnnt~~ r nNn Arrn;nlnrivit Ac: ru~~ 1~.,~tri.c» r:r," January 29, 2007 ~~ Owens -Page 2 7. That all signage be compliant with current Code; 8. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted of the same materials as the building; and 9. That a Unity of Title be recorded with the Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court and a copy submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan date received December 26, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 28, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions; please do not hesitate to call Steven Everitt, Planner II, at 727-562- 4567. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www. myc l earw ater. co m . Sincerely, ~"~'~~~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CnseslGuljto Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) - ApprovedlGulf to Bay 2498 -Development Order.doc _~ui CITE' ~~ CI,EAR~.~TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos't' C1FF[CG BOX 4748, Ci,gARWAI'tiR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SIiRVICIiS I3111LD1NG, lOO SOt1TIi MYR'i'I_Ii AVG\'UR, CI,EARWA"I'F:R, FLORIDA 33756 "I'I:Lr:PltoNe (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4865 LoN~G Rnr;GI: PIA:~NING DI?Vlil_OPMENT RIiV]GW January 29, 2007 Sandra Owens Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue . Lakeland, FL 33803 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-07043 at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Ms. Owens: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E. of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. The DRC recommended approval of the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for A prp oval: 1. The proposal complies with the Offices criteria under provisions of Section 2-703.I.; 2. The plan complies with the General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Engineering conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That all Environmental conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That all Fire conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That all Land Resource conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 5. That all Stormwater conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 6. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Gulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -Approved\Gulf to Bay 249$ ~ i;,R~''~r~4~~tg8t, Q3~gI~~°C J,n,;: I)c~w~~, Cr~iu~~Cn.~ii:>nsra< 1~I,n~r ] L~~!u:a~x. C,x~~~cn.~ut~n;r:r 13u.i.)~i~'sci~, C~wr:c:u.~n~::~+isitr, C,~ri.i~:;.~ ~A. Yrrrr.>r:~. Cni~~~cn_~n:~nir:r. "Et,xiAi. I:n~u~LOV~wr:~~~~r nNn Arr•n;~~I,rnvit Acri<~~~ E~~n~i.ovitr," January 29, 2007 ~ • Owens -Page 2 7. That all signage be compliant with current Code; 8. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted of the same materials as the building; and 9. ~ That a Unity of Title be recorded with the Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court and a copy submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan date received December 26, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 28, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain .any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions; please do not hesitate to call Steven Everitt, Planner II, at 727-562- 4567. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www. m.yclearwater. com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finisher! CaseslGuljto Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) - ApprovedlGulf to Bay 2498 -Development Order.doc a ~ • !4r `~~:r rr~.~i PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~++vAT E~~~~~ Posy Or•1=ICr Box 4748, CLt~aaWA"rrat, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ~r~itll ~f ML)NICIPAI. SIiRVICI;S I31J11.D1\G, IOO SOU'fI-[ MYR"17.E AVIiNtJI3, CLGARWA"CRR, FLORIDA 33756 TIiLGPhlo;~~r: (727) 562-4567. FAx (727) 562-4865 I,o;\c Rnncl: Plnvwnc 1)EVIiLOPMG\1' IZIiVIIiW January 29, 2007 Sandra Owens Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-07043 at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Ms. Owens: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E. of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. The DRC recommended approval of the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Ap royal: 1. The proposal complies with the Offices criteria under provisions of Section 2-703.I.; 2. The plan complies with the General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913;.and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Engineering conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That all Environmental conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That all Fire conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That all Land Resource conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 5. That all Stormwater conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 6. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; S:\Planning Department\C D B\F1ex Standard (FIS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Gulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -Approved\Gulf to Bay 249$: i;:~ely~C~~~~~~, 4i~4F~4~oc J;~un I~~~w~n~, C~~ur:cn.an~:atisr.< 11c~rr 1 i.v.!u:r~~x, C~~i~n~cn.>;r:~nsi;r I3u.i. J<~~sos, Can ncn_~nt~utr:it C~i<,.i:x %+. 1'rrersr:~, Gx ~Cn_~n:vi+r:r "Iic>unL Ii~w~LOV~~Ih~ r non n.=nan~nnvl~: nc„cry 1?;~mLC~, ita" r • January 29, 2007 Owens -Page 2 7. That all signage be compliant with current Code; 8. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted of the same materials as the building; and 9. That a Unity of Title be recorded with the Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court and a copy submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan date received December 26, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 28, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. ,Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Steven Everitt, Planner II, at 727-562- 4567. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www. myclearwater. com . Sincerely, ~- ~/~ ~,~ ~ //` r/ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlnnningDepartmentlCD BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslGulfto Bny 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -ApprovedlGuljto Bay 2498 -Development Order.doc • ~I~~iv~.~'-f~ \~~ ` '~\ v~ r *Y' ~ -~ ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ..~ ,;~ .. ~,. 1 L ~'~~'gTER`~~+° Posr Or=rlcr: Box 1748, Cr.taltWarraz, FLOalnn 33758-4748 ~fi~t`I~y MUNICIPAL Sl;avrcls I3UIIDING, 100 Sou"rx MYrrrLr Avr:NU[:, CLenaWn"rr:a, FLOlzrnn 33756 Tr:LIa~tloNe (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) 562-4865 LoNC RnNCr: P1.AA'N1Nc I~I:VI;I.OPMI:N1' IZI:V1r;W January 29, 2007 Sandra Owens Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-07043 at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Ms. Owens: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E. of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. The DRC recommended approval of the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Ap rp oval: 1. The proposal complies with the Offices criteria under provisions of Section 2-703.I.; 2. The plan complies with the General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913;. and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Engineering conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That all Environmental conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That all Fire conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That all Land Resource conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 5. That all Stormwater conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 6. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FIS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Gulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -Approved\Gulf to Bay 249~~ ~;:~~,''r9R~I~lg~t. S~i~gr~~Oe J~~i~n D~~wv:, Crx~~~cu:~nt.~nsitr. (k~rr 1[:~>ui:r~~x. C~x~~~<:u.>nt~u;r:r 13;i.LJ~mso~~, Ccli~n~cuant:wsit~z C~~ri.r:,~ %~. Prn;r,>e~, C~x~~r.n_~m.~nter "Iic Muni. linu>i.or,ti~i•:n r non ~rrn;:~in nv~; Ac. ru~x I;,~n>LO~ i.at„ January 29, 2007 Owens -Page 2 7. That all signage be compliant with current Code; 8. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted of the same materials as the building; and 9. That a Unity of Title be recorded with the Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court and a copy submitted to. the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan date received December 26, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 28, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits, or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Steven Everitt, Planner II, at 727-562- 4567. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www. mycl earwater. co m . Sincerely, ~'`` ~~- .//f ~~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepnrtmentlCD BlFlex Stnndnrd (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslGuljto Bay 2498 - Bnnk Atlantic (C) - ApprovedlGuljto Bay 2498 -Development Order.doc i • Clearwater Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Sandra Owens DATE: 01/29/2007 FAX: 863-802-1505 TELEPHONE: FROM: Steven Everitt TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4547 EMAIL: steven.everitt@myclearwater.com SUBJECT: FLS2006-07043 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Development Order MESSAGE: Attached is the Development Order for the above case. NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 3 ~ • • , ~t{~+~(~or y~..~ r''~~. ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT =~'~`''- ' ~ ~ ~°~ Pos'r OPFICr Box 4748, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 '~-~'QT'ER~ ~' ~~'~in~t ~}f ]VIUNICIPAI. SI;RVICIiS I3Ull.D1NG, 1OO SOIJTI-i ]VIYR'1'LIi AVB\U[3, CLHARWA"fF:R, FLOItInA 33756 TI:LrPfIO~~R (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4865 LONG Rnnca PIr1NNI1G DL-VI;LOPMENT IZIVIEW January 29, 2007 Sandra Owens Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 RE: .Development Order regarding case FLS2006-07043 at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Ms. Owens: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E. of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. The DRC recommended approval of the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Offices criteria under provisions of Section 2-703.I.; 2. The plan complies with the General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913;. and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of A nroval: 1. That all Engineering conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That all Environmental conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That all Fire conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That all Land Resource conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 5. That all Stormwater conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 6. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FIS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Gulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -Approved\Gulf to Bay 249: it:~~i''~~4~T~g~t, g3~gT~4~oc (cnc~ i~c~w~i:, Ccn~c:n.,~ut>nsiac l lcn-r li:~~ni:r<~~, Ccx nc:n.>nc>.nsrit 13u.i. Jc;ns<I~, Ccluncn.~nt~+iser C:~iti.i:,~ A. Prrr:rsr:~, Ccx ~cn.>n[>ucr:r, "Ec~>i InL I:nlPi.ovMr:w r ,wn ~rru;Mn rlvl: Ac: rule i;~~mLCI~ f:R'~ w ~ ~ ~ • January 29, 2007 Owens -Page 2 7. That all signage be compliant with current Code; 8. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted of the same materials as the building; and 9. That a Unity of Title be recorded with the Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court and a copy submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan date received December 26, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 28, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Steven Everitt, Planner II, at 727-562- 4567. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www. m.yclean~- ater. com . Sincerely, ~. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslGulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) - ApprovedlGulf to Bay 2498 -Development Order.doc a `~ Jan. 29 2007 12:38PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE iSTART TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 918638021505 'Jan. 29 12:37PM 01'17 SND 03 OK TO TURN DFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' 1104. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+, OR ,_,. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HEI..P-FW{ C435-73297. . ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~1' 111.8 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803 Phone: 863-802-1500 Fax: 863-802-1505 December 18; 2006 Mr. John Schodtler City of Clearwater Plamling Department Municipal Services Building 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006-07043 - 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd CDS # 6009 ORIGINAL RECENED ~C 2 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTIVIEniI CITY OF CLEARW~4TFft Dear Mr. Schodtler. We have reviewed and addressed your comments dated December 4, 2006, and final comments received December 6, 2006 aria email. Listed below are our written responses to each of the commments given in order to perform a fuial review of this project. Fire Comments 1. Comment: Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all enhance and exits. PRIOR TO D.O. Response: Refer to the added Fi8•e Truck Path Plan (FP-1), we routed the ta•uck through the site using a minimum 30'-0" turning radius. Landscape Comments 1. Comment: 11 /13/Ob Revise Landscape Plan L-1 to show sight visibiliri~ h~iangles at the corners o f Old Coachman Road & Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Old Coachman Road cQ: Shelley Sheet. Note that no landscaping or structures shall exceed 30 inches in height withi» these sight visibilit>~ triangles. 7/31/06 Application Section H, Landscape Plan submittal Requirements, states that the landscape plan (i. e. sheet LP-101) shall include: Site Visibility Triangles. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 and the Landscape Pian; sheet L-1 for the added sight triangle at the intersections of Guif to Bay and ®ld Coachman Road and Shelly Sta•eet and OId Coachman Road. As per instructions of City staff, the identification sign was required to be located 5'-0" from each right of way line as shown on our plans. 'f'he sign is proposed as a double pole sign with clear open area to a height of 7'-6" to the bottom of the sign offering a view thru the sight triangle area. • ~~ • hIAV E NoT ~uSTi~' ~6~0 GA G ~* ~ t 5" -'1l-IbR.6 ~PP6A.2 s Tn ~ WD K-61A5 O ~J ~o rL i'-.-1 ~ ~' ~v~~s 'i~D 3~, ~~ - S ~p L,L, . .: .=..~~rr~~'WI'1Y. RECENED ~ ~~c 2 s Zoos PL4NNIN~ l~l:pt;r~tt~,~~;.~K clN of ~~~~~~..~;,. <<~ 2. Comment: 11 /13/06 The Live Oaks and. Magnolias proposed in the western five foot perimeter landscape buffer seem to be a poor choice. 1) They are going to create problems for vehicular traffic on both the subject and neighboring sites. 2) Their root systems are notorious for lifting asphalt, especially when placed in narrow landscape beds. Pez•haps placing accent trees alo»g this buffez• would be a better idea (2 accent trees =1 shade tree). 7/31 /06 VerifJ' and explain how the proposed landscaping and trees are going to coexist with the landscaping and trees of the adjacent property. Response: Refer to the revised Landscape plan; sheet L-1. for listed changes: (3) Live 6~alcs and (2) Magnolias have been replaced with. (1Q) accent trees. Comment: Revise page L-1. The quantities on the materials list table do not match the quanitites labeled on the landscape plan. (1) tx~o " ll "are not labeled near eastern entz•ance. (2) The "SP" label on the north end of the building indicates a quantity of five but the plan shows six. (3) tx~o "OT~are not labeled in the eastern perimeter landscape buffer. (4) `7VS" list indicates 170 -plan shows 175. (S) ` JC "list indicates 190 -plan show 219. (6) "VS" list indicates 231- plan shows 234. (7) "LM" list indicates 289 -plan shows 402. (8) "L1VIV" list indicates 170 -plan shows 193. (9) "TA "list indicates 265 -plan shows 256, (10) "TJ" list indicates 210 -plan shows 245. Response: Refer to the Landscape plan; sheet L-1 for the revised matec-ials list with the revised quantities. Land Resource Comments Cozzzzrzent: 11/13/06 Show the canopies of trees to be preserved. I still don 't like all of the proposed activity under the trees, revise plan to show all cuts under the canopies shall be radial to the tree. Provide prior to building permit.. 8/14/06 Revise the Irrigation Plan to prevent trenching under the canopies of trees to be preserved prior to D.O. Response: We added the canopies of the trees to be preserved to all plan sheets. A Tree Preservation Plan (sheet L-2) was prepared by the Licensed Landscape Architect upon consulting his certified Licensed Arborist (1'~ardeman Kempton & Associates were contracted by CIiS, Inc. to perform these specific functions as the City requested during our meeting). Recommendations for preservation of the existing trees can be found on Sheet L-2, proposed cuts have been B•evised as requested. 2. Conzznent: 11 /13/06 Show the actual lizzTits of the tzee barricades and remove tlae root pruning note on the demolition plan. Revise prior to building permit. Response: Revised tree barricades to match the tree preservation plan and the recommendations of the Landscape Architect hired to prepare the tree preservation. plan. Refer to sheet D-1 for revised barricades locations and to sheet L-2 for the tree preservation plan. Co»znzent: 8/14/06 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field ofarboriculture. This plan must slzox~ how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i. e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan -nust show the frets canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines i f required), and the tree • barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Response: The Tree Preservation Plan enclosed was prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect (consulting with his licensed arborist -Ted Kempton), the plan shows all building, parking, and drainage structures, proposed utilities do not impact the trees to be preserved. This plan shows the impact of the proposed development to the trees to be retained as well as recommendation for preservation to ensure survival of those trees. In addition, 'T'ree barricade symbols have been adjusted on the tree preservation plan to provide protection up to 2/3 of the drip line. Tz•affie Eng Comments 1. Comment.• Provide a 40' curb radius for ingress access along Gulf to Bay. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the adjusted the curb radius from 30' to 40' on the ingress side of the driveway. 2. Comment: Provide a right turn only sign and also replace through pavement arrow with a right turn arrow. Response: Refer to the Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the revised stop sign with added right turn only sign to and we replaced the through arrow with a turn arrow at the driveway at Gulf To Bay. Refer also to sheet C-6 for the Stop Sign detail. 3. Comment: Replace wlieel stops with 4' high 6" dia. Concrete/metal bollards. Response: Per conversation with city staff, this comment is not a code requirement and we will maintain the concrete ear stops. A note has been added to paint the ear stops "safety yellow'IL prevent hazards. RECEIVED All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. ~~~ ~ 2 ~ zoos General Note(s): PLANNING DEPARTMENT I) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. CITY OF CLEARWATER 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Applicability Criteria #1 I) Comnzent.• 11/13/06 Your recent response did not demonstrate how the proposed bank building is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and clurracter of the neighboring property (uniform cit)). The tra• fic concern has been addressed. Please attempt to address the increase to building height in your response about bulk or scale. Response: EJpon receipt of these comments we made another site visit to view the suE•rounding business (businesses within walking distance of the proposed development). There are two new buildings within walking distance of this facility that may have my have undergone a Flexible Development Standard Review with regards to the height of the building and the setback of structures. The fast one is the ~'oliday Inn Express currently under construction which appears to be a four story building which is in excess of the 25'-0" height requirement. The other building used in our comparison is the Wachovia Bank facility located at 2699 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Wachovia is a .~ ®RIGINAL RECEIVED ', _~€, 2 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEf~ direct competitor of BankAtlantic's in this area. The Wachovia building appears to be CITY OF GLEARWATER approximately 35' tall to the peak of the roof and would have undergone the same Flexible Development Review to alleviate the 25' maximum height criteria. In addation, the Wachovia Building appears to be somewhat of a box with a triangle lid on it. The towers on this building are BankAtlantic's signature look and do not make the building appear bulky because the top of the parapet wall is at 20'-1" then the top of the tower wall steps up approximately 7' to 27'-4" and the slope of the roof carries the peak up approximately 7' again to 34'-2 1/18" this dimension is the peak of the hip roof, the slope of this roof is graceful, and makes the tower balanced (architecturally pleasing). The graduation of height and the colors of the building create a welcoming feel, and tied the architectural elements together. The proposed height is consistent with other buildings within walking distance of this site. The colors are complimentary to the colors of other businesses within walking distance of this site (Vt'algreens, Wachovia, and the holiday Inn Express as examples). Therefore, we feel that BankAtlantic will be in harmony with other businesses in the area. With regard to Scale and Density, the bank building proposed is smaller than most of the comparable businesses in the area, however since the site is also small the floor area ratio and the total impervious area are in harmony with the surrounding properties. In this case this site will appear to have more landscaping and open space than most of the neighboring properties, therefore improving the appearance of this corner. 16~Iost parcels immediate to this one appear to have much smaller landscape buffers and have not been redeveloped under the current guidelines; therefore, reduction of the structure setback here will help this site flow, visually, to the neighboring properties. General Applicability Criteria #5 Conrnrent: 11 /13/06 Your response to General Applicability Criterion #S has not been sufficiently addressed. The Code does not allow the proposed variations as you have indicated. You have to justify tl~e request to increase the building height above x~hat is allowable by Code, which is 25 feet. You also have to justify the setback reductions for pavement. The allowable three front setbacks are 25 feet and remaining side setback is 10 feet. The landscape buffers do not demonstrate compliance for pavement setbacks, especially when a reduction to the west side landscape buffer is a part of the request. Response: Please refer to Criteria #1 for our response to the increased height and justification of the building height; we apologize for the misstatement previously submitted. V1'e are requesting a reduction to the structure setback as permitted by the land development code under the Flexible Development Guidelines. The site is too small to accommodate the building, required drive isle widths with 1•equia•ed parking stall depths and if the Bank is not permitted a review under the flexible development standards, they would not be able to construct this facility at this location. In fact, if staff had not suggested the Flexible Development Review at our pre-development meeting, we would have recommended that BankAtlantie pass on this site. BankAtlantic has 10 employees per shift and is open 7 days and therefore needs more parking to accommodate their employees as well as the public. Unencumbered traffic flow necessitates the drive isles, in the current locations. We are meeting the minimum required setback permitted under the flexible development standards on all sides of the property with only pavement intruding into the required 25' setback. 2. Comment: 8/23/06 Clare. Hotia~ are the increased building height and setback reductions to pavement consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Address separately. Response: As stated previously, the building height is consistent with ether new businesses within walking distance of this site (Walgreen, Holiday Inn Express, Wachovia Bank). The property immediately adjacent to this parcel (and across the streets does not appear to have been developed under the current guidelines. The pavement setback appears to be much less than 15'. Therefore reduction of the pavement setback for this location will permit the BankAtlantic parcel to be in harmony with the adjacent property, keeping the curb tines somewhat consistent as you look down the street. Ttfowever, the Bank~itlantic site will be much more pleasing to the eye and haee more green area and landscaping than the parcels immediately adjacent to this site. Zoning Comments: 1. Comment: The parking counts as indicated in `Parking Provided" on page C-2 appear to be inconsistent with the proposed site plan. 11/13/06: The plan shows 21 - 9 x 1 S spaces and the table indicates 22 spaces. 7/31/06 The plan shows 19 - 9 x 19 spaces, 9 - 9 x 20 spaces, and 2 -12 x 20 HC spaces. Revise one or the other. Response: T'he parking data chart has been modified to match the plans (See C-2 for details.) 2. Comment: NOTE: The sign plans are inconsistent. The site plan shows the, fi•ees>anding signs at 2~ feet in height and the freestanding sign elevation states 14 feet in height. The Site plan C-2 says one ,freestanding sign is 14 feet in height and the other 25 feet. No need to revise for this site plan approval. But the plans will need to be consistent for the CSP, building and sign permits. Response: Revised pole sign note on signage plan to 14 ft. high to match detail and site plan. 1 3. Conz»aent: 11/13/Ob Place the response (listed below) submitted on November 8, 2006 on the site plan and/or roofplan. 7/31/06 Depict on the site plan andlor roofplan the locations ofall mechanical equipment including a/c and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view of adjacent properties and rights-of--way. Response: Refer to the Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the added mechanical equipment screening note stating to refer to the building plans and sections for all required details. Please contact me as soon as possible if our responses to the "Criteria Comments" are unacceptable. BankAtlantic has a construction start date of 1"'ebruary 1, 2007 for this location and I would like to provide the City with responses that are acceptable without another plan submission if possible. Res ectfully submitted; Nora an D. Gruzst ad Senior Project Manager ORIGINAL RECENED ~;~~ 2 n 2006 PLANNING DEPAR~iVIEh' CIN OF CLEARWo'~~ l X 1118 South Florida Avenue ~~~ Lakeland, Florida 33803-1308 ~~. Phone: 863-802-1500 ~~~®~~' ~C Fax: 863-802-1505 November 7, 2006 Mr. John Schodtler, Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department Municipal Services Building 9RIGINAL 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~~~ Q $ 2006 Re: FLS2006-07043 - 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd PLANNING DEPARTMENT Engineers # 6009 CITY CF CLEARWATER Dear Mr. Schodtler, We have reviewed and addressed your comments dated August 31, 2006. Listed below are our written responses to each of the comments given in order to perform a final review of this project. Engineering Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Comment: The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaimed water meters. Response: So Noted. 2. Comment: Need a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a building permit. Response: We will provide a copy of the approved right-of--way permit from Pinellas County when approved. 3. Comment: Need a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from D.O.T. prior to issuance of a building permit. Response: We will provide a copy of the approved right-of--way permit from D.O.T. when approved. 4. Comment: Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index # 108. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the corrected radii with the S.R. 60 driveway having additional requirements as mandated by FDOT. 5. Comment: Is building to be sprinkled? If so, show on the plan location of Fire Department Connection and associated piping. Response: No sprinkler system is planned for this building therefore no Fire Department Connection or piping is required. Prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy: 1. Comment: All unused drive aprons and /or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of--way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. Response: Refer to the Demo Plan; sheet C-1 for the removal of the unused drive aprons and restoration as required. 2. Comment: Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304). Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 for all new sidewalk information. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Response: So Noted. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a building Permit Application. Response: So Noted. ORIGINAL RECENED I~OV 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER v~u V11Y/yL RECEIVED ~ ~ ~°`J~ o $ 2006 Environmental: PLANNINGD~EPARTMENT 1. Comment: Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are peCrinittaAb~e ATER only for water quantity storage (attenuation). If specifically approved by the City Engineer in accordance with City "Storm Drainage Design Criteria" Page 7. Provide for treatment of 1/2- inch of rainfall over the entire site in a surface treatment facility. If it is necessary to use a vault for attenuation, provide justification demonstrating undue hardship to the developer. With parking in excess of the size required by code (9-feet by 18-feet) and in excess of the number of spaces required by code, this justification may be a challenge. Response: See Enclosed Letter of Explanation. Due to the size of the parcel, the connections of the proposed driveway locations, pedestrian access requirements, along with the required parking per code and the clients parking requirements due to their unique standards of operation, the number of parking spaces do ezceed the total number required by code. This is due mainly to handle customer parking along with the number of employee spaces required to maintain this facility. Refer to the revised Site Layout Plan; sheet C-3 for the reduced size of the parking stall depth as mentioned in the City Staff' s comments. In doing so, we reduced the square footage of impervious area on site and reduced the impact of the adjacent parking area to the existing 38 inch oak tree to remain. With the existing large trees to remain and the traffic circulation requirements, the only way the on-site stormwater management system could be accomplished was to construct the StormTech system, putting the pollution abatement and storm attenuation volumes within the trench systems. As per the designed system, the Isolation Chambers are designed to accommodate any trash and silt buildup by being accessible for wash down and collection and removal of the debris. The structures adjacent to the StormTech system are designed to include a sump area to help with the drop out of any silt prior to entering the chamber areas. Therefore, we are requesting approval of the designed stormwater management system as submitted. 1. Comment: Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO D.O. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the driveway corrections. Landscape• 1. Comment: Application Section H, Landscape Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the ~~~ landscape plan (i.e. sheet LP-101) shall include: Sight Visibility Triangles. t°`~ Response: Refer to the Landscape Plan; sheet L-1 for the added Sight Visibility Triangle. 2. Comment: Verify and explain how the proposed landscaping and trees are going to coexist with the landscaping and trees of the adjacent property. Response: We do not see any conflicts with our proposed landscaping and the adjacent property, furthermore, we are maintaining adequate separation between proposed and existing trees on site. 3. Comment: Revise the landscape plan to show 100 percent coverage in the required 15 foot landscape buffers along Gulf to Bay, Old Coachman, and Shelley Street. Also revise the landscape planting schedule as needed. Response: Landscaping has been provided to show 100% coverage throughout. The materials list ~~•~ has been updated. • Land Resource• 1. Comment: The tree survey is inaccurate; the 24" Crape Myrtle is actually a 24" Oak tree. Revise prior to building permit. Response: So Noted. 2. Comment: The tree survey is inaccurate on the Landscape Plan. There is only one tree (38") on the north property line. Revise prior to D.O. Response: So Noted. 3. Comment: Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (OBIT). Provide prior to D.O. Response: So Noted. 4. Comment: The proposed parking is too close to the 38" Oak tree. Relocate the edge of pavement to be a minimum 20' away prior to D.O. Response: Refer to the revised paved area in question having been changed to 6" conc. as discussed in the pre-development meeting with city staff. 5. Comment: Revise the Irrigation Plan to prevent trenching under the canopies of trees to be preserved prior to D.O. Response: The irrigation lines shown on the plan are schematic only. Adjustments will be made during construction to avoid any conflicts with existing trees. 6. Comment: Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified azborist, consulting azborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of azboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, storm water and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail, and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Response: Refer to the attached Tree Preservation Plan. ORIGINAL Parks & Recreation: RECENED 1. Comment: No Issues -project is less than one acre. ~U~ 0 8 2~~6 Response: So Noted. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Storm Water• 1. Comment: The following conditions are to be met prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) Provide a copy of the SWFWMD permit. 2) Redesign the retention volume to meet the retrofit requirements of the City of Clearwater. Response: Refer to enclosed SWFWMD Permit and refer to enclosed revised stormwater calculations. Traffic En$ineerinE: 1. Comment: The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this proposal in accordance with Community Development Code Section 4-801 as the new trips generated by the project exceeds 100 additional trips during the pm peak hour. Prior to conducting a TIA, the applicant shall schedule an appointment for a scoping meeting with the Traffic Operations Division. Call Bennett Elbo at (727) 562-4775. Response: Revised traffic study submitted via email prior to this plan submission. Please refer to that submission. 2. Comment: Provide stacking space for a total of 18 vehicles along the three drive through lanes per Community Development Code Section 3-1406 B.3.b. Response: Per discussions during the staff meeting and the furnished information regarding drive-thru counts of other Bank Atlantic facilities. We are requesting a waiver of this requirement and to approve the plan as shown. 3. Comment: The eighteen stacked vehicles in the drive through lanes shall not block any drive aisles or parking spaces. Response: Refer to the response above. 4. Comment: Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and the intersections of Gulf to Bay and Old Coachman and Shelley Street and Old Coachman. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Response: Refer to the Site Plan; sheet C-2 and the Landscape Plan; sheet L-1 for the added sight visibility triangle. 5. Comment: Provide a stop bar with a word "stop" and a "do not enter" sign at the exit for the drive through lanes. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the added pavement markings and signage. 6. Comment: Provide a "do not enter" sign for the one-way drive aisle along east side of the building. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. Response: Please refer to the revise Site Plan, sheet C-2 for the addition of the Do Not Enter sign placed at the northern end of the one-way drive lane along the east side of the building. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Refer to the added notes to the Site Plan sheet C-2. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~V ~ 8 2~~6 PLANNING DEPARilv~ENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Planning• 1. Comment: Clarify and explain. How is the proposed bank building in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of the adjacent property (uniform city)? Reply to each separately. * * *two areas of concern 1) the building appears to be top heavy for a single story building; 2) the additional traffic at an already overloaded intersection. Response: Per discussions at Staff Meeting -Photos of the proposed building were emailed to 1 ~ John as requested showing the architectural design features. As to the "already overloaded intersection", refer to the comment below for an explanation. 2. Comment: Clarify in more depth. How the proposed is designed to minimize traffic congestion? Response: The proposed site design, having reduced the number of roadway connection and the placement of the remaining driveways as discussed in the Staff Meeting, will help due to the fact that traffic is not entering the roadway as close to the intersection. Also discussed at the meeting a' is the fact that Bank Atlantic's hours of operation lends itself to reducing the traffic impact especially during peak hour traffic conditions. Once customers acclimate themselves to the expanded hours of operation, they will learn to visit the bank during the off-peak hours thus reducing or minimizing the traffic congestion at this already busy intersection. 3. Comment: Clarify. How are the increased building height and setback reductions to pavement consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Address separately. Response: The building height for a commercial structure as per code ranges from a 25 - 35 foot allowed overall height. The proposed building tower height totals a little more than 32 feet which is within the code allowance. As for the setback reductions for the pavement, again the code requires a 15 foot buffer from the front and side R/W lines and 10 from the rear R/W line. These area per our plan are being met. The only reduction being requested is from the 10 foot interior side buffer requirement for which we are requesting and showing a minimum of a 5 foot buffer adjacent to the commercially zoned property to the west of our site. Again, the code allows for such a reduction of the required buffer as approved by the department. 4. Comment: Depict on the site plan and/or roof plan the locations of all mechanical equipment including a/c and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view ~(~ of adjacent properties and rights-of--way. Res onset All I3VAC a ui ment is roof m un p q p o ted and screened by parapet walls around the building. S. Comment: Building elevations are labeled inconsistent with the site plan. North appears to be east...Revise labels. ® Response: Refer to the revised Architectural elevations provided with this re-submittal. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~OV 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTtiAENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • 6. Comment: NOTE: Even though a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) application was made: - it appears there are some visibility issues with the freestanding signs due to the placement of trees; and . ~ U - it appears there are some visibility issues with the attached signs due to the placement of J """ ~ trees. This note is for your information only. Sign visibility through the trees and ~(~ landscaping is not a Code requirement, but should be taken into consideration as the installation of the landscaping will be held to the approved plan. Response: So Noted. -Items will be coordinated with the revised Landscape Plan. 7. Comment: The ATM location as indicated on the (north) building elevation seems to be placed p~ , in a foundation landscape buffer of liriope that also includes a sabal palm. Revise one or the (~/ other. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for the proposed ATM location at the east side of the building near the Southeast building corner. This location is serviced by a concrete sidewalk and the foundation plantings have been relocated. 8. Comment: The parking counts as indicated in "Parking Provided" on page C-2 appear to be ,y~ inconsistent with the proposed site plan. The plan shows 19 - 9x 19 spaces, 9 - 9~c20 spaces, and N ~ 2 -12~c20 HC spaces. Revise one or the other. ' Response: Refer to the revised parking tabulation on the Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the site call-outs to reflect a coordinated notation of the two. Sincerely, Norman D. Grinstead Senior Project Manager ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~V ~ 8 2006 PLANNING DEPArziwdE~T CIN OF GLEARWATER • • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 August 29, 2006 SANDRA OWENS -COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 1118 S FLORIDA AVENUE LAKELAND, FL 33803 RE: FLS2006-07043 LOCATED AT - 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD Dear : SANDRA OWENS -COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: .These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, August 31, 2006 Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that maybe generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the -DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, John Schodtler, Planner II cc: File DRC Pre-DRC Comments Mail Out ~~,~'_ti_ ~. ~" 4~~~~ ER-~}*` ~J Conditions Associated With FLS2006-07043 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 08/21/2006 Prior to issuance of a building permit: 562-4773 1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaimed water meters. 2. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 5. Is building to be sprinkled? If so, show on the plan location of Fire Department Connection and associated piping. Prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy: 1. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of-way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 2. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Not Met General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 08/17/2006 Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only for water Not Met quantity storage (attenuation) if specifically approved by the City Engineer in accordance with City "Storm Drainage Design Criteria" Page 7 . Provide for treatment of 1/2-inch of rainfall over the entire site in a surface treatment facility. If it is necessary to use a vault for attenuation, provide justification demonstrating undue hardship to the developer. With parking in excess of the size required by code (9-feet by 18-feet) and in excess of the number of spaces required by code, this justification may be a challenge. Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 08/16/2006 Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and Not Met egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO D.O. Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 07/31/2006 Application Section H, Landscape Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the landscape plan Not Met (i.e. sheet LP-101) shall include: Site Visibility Triangles. Print Date: 08/29/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 • • FLS2006-07043 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD Landscape 07/31 /2006 07/31 /2006 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Verify and explain how the proposed landscaping and trees are going to coexist with the landscaping and trees of the adjacent property. Revise the landscape plan to show 100 percent coverage in the require 15 landscape buffers along Gulf To Bay, Old Coachman, and Shelley Street. Also revise the landscape planting schedule as needed; 562-4818 Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 08/14/2006 The tree survey is inaccurate, the 24" Crape Myrtle is actually a 24" Oak tree.- Revise prior to Not Met building permit. 08/14/2006 The tree survey is inacturate on the Landscape Plan. There is only one tree (38") on the north Not Met property line. Revise prior to D.O. ° 08/14/2006 Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hardwoods is Not Met one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide prior to D.O. 08/14/2006 The proposed parking is too close to the 38" Oak tree. Relocate the edge of pavement to be a min Not Met 20' away prior to D.O. 08/14/2006 Revise the Irrigation Plan to prevent trenching under the canopies of trees to be preserved prior to Not Met D.O. 08/14!2006 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Parks 8 Recs Condition Debbie Reid 08/16/2006 No issues -project is less than one acre. Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 Not Met Not Met Not Met 08/15/2006 The following conditions are to be met prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) redesign the retention volume to meet the retrofit requirements of the City of Clearwater. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo Not Met 562-4775 08/14/2006 The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this proposal in accordance with Not Met Community Development Code Section 4-801 as the new trips generated by the project exceeds 100 additional trips during the pm peak hour. Prior to conducting a TIA, the applicant shall schedule an appointment for a scoping meeting with the Traffic Operations Division. Call Bennett Elbo at (727)562-4775. 2.Provide stacking space for a total of 18 vehicles along the three drive through lanes per Community Development Code Section 3-1406 B. 3. b. 3. The eighteen stacked vehicles in the drive through lanes shallt not block any drive aisles or parking spaces. 4. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and the intersections of Gulf to Bay and Old Coachman and Shelley Street and Old Coachman. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Print Date: 08/29/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 '~ . • FLS2006-07043 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 5. Provide a stop bar with a word "stop" and a "do not enter sign" at the exit from the drive through lanes. 6. Provide a "do not enter" sign for the oneway drive aisle along east side of the building. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O.. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Applicability Criteria #1 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/23/2006 Clarify and explain. How is the proposed bank building in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, Not Met density, and character of the adjacent property (uniform city)? Reply to each seperately. **"two areas of concern 1) The building appears to be top heavy for a single story building. 2) The additional traffic at an already overloaded intersection. General Applicability Criteria #4 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/23/2006 Clarify in more depth. How is the proposed designed to minimize traffic congestion? Not Met General Applicability Criteria #5 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/23/2006 Clarify. How are the increased building height and setback reductions to pavement consistent with Not Met the community character of the immediate vicinity? Address seperately. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 07/31/2006 Depict on the site plan and/or roof plan the locations of all mechancial equipment including a/c Not Met and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view of adjacent properties and rights-of-way. 07/31/2006 Building elevations are labelled inconsistent with the site plan. North appears to be east...Revise Not Met labels. 07/31/2006 NOTE: Even though a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) application was made: Not Met - it appears there are some visibility issues with the freestanding signs due to the placement of trees; and - it appears there are some visibility issues with the attached signs due to the placement of trees. This note is for your information only. Sign visibility throught the trees and landscaping is not a Code requirement, but should be taken into consideration as the installation of the landscaping will be held to the approved plan. 07/31/2006 The ATM location as indicated on the (north) building elevation seems to be placed in a Not Met foundation landscape buffer of Liriope that also includes a sabal palm. I guess Bank Atlantic's customers have long arms, so they can reach through 6-7 feet of landscaping? Revise one or the other. 07/31/2006 The parking counts as indicated in "Parking Provided" on page C-2 appear to be inconsistent with Not Met the proposed site plan. The plan shows 19 - 9x19 spaces, 9 - 9x20 spaces, and 2 - 12x20 HC spaces. Revise one or the other. Print Date: 08/29/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 • ~ .,~ • • Aug. 29 2006 09:34AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTkiER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 918638021505 Au g. 29 09:32AM 01'48 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' hHyLl' tt04. THBJ SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-S~-FEiP-FAX C435-7329). • Case Number: FLS2006-07043 -= 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD Owner(s): Leo J Murphy Jr Po Box 66 Cuba, Ny 14727 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Sandra Owens -Commercial Development Solutions 1118 S Florida Avenue Lakeland, FI 33803 TELEPHONE: 863-802-1500, FAX: 863-802-1505, E-MAIL: SANDRA.O WENS@CDSINCMAIL.COM Location: 0.96 acres located on the west side of Old Coachman Road between the intersections of Gulf To Bay Boulevard (SR60) and Shelley Street. Atlas Page: 290B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south).setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement);a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Bay Aristocrat Village Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33764 18675 Us Hwy 19 N TELEPHONE: 531-4906, FAX: 535-0925, E-MAIL: patbar@aol.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 31, 2006 -Page 54 U Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaimed water meters. 2. Need a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Need a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from D.O.T. prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 5. Is building to be sprinkled? If so, show on the plan location of Fire Department Connection and associated piping. Prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy: 1. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of--way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 2. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only for water quantity storage (attenuation) if specifically approved by the City Engineer in accordance with City "Storm Drainage Design Criteria" Page 7 . Provide justification for an underground vault. With parking in excess of the size required by code (9-feet by 18-feet) and in excess of the number of spaces required by code, this justification will need to be compelling. Fire: 1 , Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 31, 2006 -Page 55 l , The tree survey is inaccurate, the 24" Crape Myrtle is actually a 24" Oak tree. Revise prior to building permit. 2 , The tree survey is inacturate on the Landscape Plan. There is only one tree (38") on the north property line. Revise prior to D.O. 3 , Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide prior to D.O. 4 , The proposed parking is too close to the 38" Oak tree. Relocate the edge of pavement to be a min 20' away prior to D.O. 5 , Revise the Irrigation Plan to prevent trenching under the canopies of trees to be preserved prior to D.O. 6 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Application Section H, Landscape Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the landscape plan (i.e. sheet LP-101) shall include: Site Visibility Triangles. 2 , Verify and explain how the proposed landscaping and trees are going to coexist with the landscaping and trees of the adjacent property. 3 , Revise the landscape plan to show 100 percent coverage in the require 15 landscape buffers along Gulf To Bay, Old Coachman, and Shelley Street. Also revise the landscape planting schedule as needed; Parks and Recreation: Stormwater: No issues -project is less than one acre. 1 . The following conditions are to be met prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) redesign the retention volume to meet the retrofit requirements of the City of Clearwater. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . ~- The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this proposal in accordance with Community Development Code Section 4-801 as the new trips generated by the project exceeds 100 additional trips during the pm peak hour. Prior to conducting a TIA, the applicant shall schedule an appointment for a scoping meeting with the Traffic Operations Division. Call Bennett Elbo at (727)562-4775. 2.Provide stacking space for a total of 18 vehicles along the three drive through lanes per Community Development Code Section 3-1406 B. 3. b. 3. The eighteen stacked vehicles in the drive through lanes shallt not block any drive aisles or parking spaces. 4. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and the intersections of Gulf to Bay and Old Coachman and Shelley Street and Old Coachman. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 5. Provide a stop bar with a word "stop" and a "do not enter sign" at the exit from the drive through lanes. 6. Provide a "do not enter" sign for the oneway drive aisle along east side of the building. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O.. Planning: General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ko t r f~ ~ ti ~~ ~ `~ "1~ 1~ Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 31, 2006 -Page 56 • 1 . Clarify and explain. How is the proposed bank building in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of the adjacent property (uniform city)? Reply to each seperately. ***two areas of concern 1) The building appears to be top heavy for a single story building. 2) The additional traffic at an already overloaded intersection. 2 . Clarify in more depth. How is the proposed designed to minimize traffic congestion? 3 . Clarify. How are the increased building height and setback reductions to pavement consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Address seperately. 4 . Depict on the site plan and/or roof plan the locations of all mechancial equipment including a/c and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view of adjacent properties and rights-of--way. 5 . Building elevations are labelled inconsistent with the site plan. North appears to be east...Revise labels. 6 . NOTE: Even though a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) application was made: - it appears there are some visibility issues with the freestanding signs due to the placement of trees; and - it appears there are some visibility issues with the attached signs due to the placement of trees. This note is for your information only. Sign visibility throught the trees and landscaping is not a Code requirement, but should be taken into consideration as the installation of the landscaping will be held to the approved plan. 7 . The ATM location as indicated on the (north) building elevation seems to be placed in a foundation landscape buffer of Liriope that also includes a sabal palm. I guess Bank Atlantic's customers have long arms, so they can reach through 6-7 feet of landscaping? Revise one or the other. 8 . The parking counts as indicated in "Parking Provided" on page C-2 appear to be inconsistent with the proposed site plan. The plan shows 19 - 9x19 spaces, 9 - 9x20 spaces, and 2 - 12x20 HC spaces. Revise one or the other. Other: No Comments Notes: ~~ ~~ P~- c- ~. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 31, 2006 -Page 57 ;'~,~'~,~'•°~%r~; CITY OF CLEARWATER :v:: ` :~~:= o: PLANNING DEPARTMENT •^•= Qa °9~ATEFF;~~, PoSI' Or~CE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 ~'~"f14~'?•i ~" GOLI INC 6600 34TH AVE N ST PETERSBURG FL 33710 - 1515 _._ Z'~'~!-A+A~-•~-~-'l.$-r~i~i C.~~14 -~s:{~~ss:~~a;ftifi~~~~~:=.srs~~i{it=.scz~~tij~i~~~it{i~t~-s~si~~ - ... Yy7 C~ "vF 11uu11 uo ~ ~~~• ~ 1~.~ ~ Z ;'''f1r .~•~' F L. H METER717445 +~ ~. "~ i ~.-.-. LL °~ ~~~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER °~~ - earwat~r PLANNING DEPARTMENT '= MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER.COM August O1, 2006 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD (FLS2006-07043) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement);a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I.. On August 31, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be August 31, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on August 31, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development r Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II eview process. r ou may access our c ~~~o~c~ D _. _.__-.__ ~, , +r; ~ 1 ~ . ~ a L_.__ _ ~A PIANNWC. =. :. i_~iELOPNiENT SEIi`~`~CES CITY Or= CLEARWATER Letter of Notification - FLS2006-07043 - 2498 GULF TO BAYBLVD ~ TiIS Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No~~~(D-b`10~-3 Location: a ~q g ~ u ~-~ -~~ Meeting Date: ~l,( V) ~ ~o ~~ ~l~d. ^ Current Use: VOCn~I~" GIGS S~-ho-rl ^ Active Code Enforcement Case (no~ ^ Address number (yes) (~) (vacant land) ^ Landscaping (yes) no o Overgrown (yes) ~o ~ Debris es) (no) o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) ®) ^ Building(s) (good) (fair) oor) (vacant land) ^ Fencing (none) (good) (dilapidated) ro en and/or missing piece ^ Paint (good) (fair) ~) (garish) ^ Grass Parking (yes) nom) o Residential Parking Violations (yes) Rio ^ Signage none (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ^ Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) ( ee s repavin ^ Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) r.1~~ o Outdoor storage (yes) no Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: ~ ~ Reviewed by: ~~ra ncQ Telephone: X`-I'" / D~ 1 Revised 0 -29- 1; 02-04-03 ~~LORIDA POWER CORP PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 GOLI INC 6600 34TH AVE N ST PETERSBURG FL 33710 - 1515 MURPHY, LEO J JR MURPHY, MICHAEL V PO BOX 66 CUBA NY 14727 - 0066 CURRENT OWNER 2455 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 CHEPREN, WILLIAM 2471 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 CERDA, JESUS M CERDA, JACQUELINE S 2489 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 HICKS, DAVID A 2488 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 KLUFETOS, JOHN KLUFETOS,FROSO 2286 MINNEOLA RD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4972 LITCHMAN, L BRADLEY 2452 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 STERN AUTO SUPPLY CO PO BOX 2710 ROANOKE VA 24001 - 2710 J C LINK CLEARWATER 4601 W COMANCHE AVE TAMPA FL 33614 - 5429 GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE H 409 OLD COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4410 HUANG, M1NG QI 1804 OAKRIDGE RD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 3725 MC GREGOR, ROBERT JR MC GREGOR, AMY 2477 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 WALLACE, GLENDA M 300 S OLD COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4407 HUNT, RUSSELL B HUNT, BERNADETTE 2482 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 STEVEN, JOHN I STEVEN, ANTJE 2466 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 STEKETEE, LINDA 2112 N 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98403 - 3005 ~ANG FAMILY PROPERTIES INC 2456 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4324 MURPHY, LEO J JR MURPHY, MICHAEL V PO BOX 66 CUBA NY 14727 - 0066 FLORIDA POWER CORP PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 MEADER, RAYMOND P 2465 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 COMPFORT, SKYE COMPFORT, CAROL 2483 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 MC NEAL, KIMBLE R MC NEAL, MARY L 720 ELM ST SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4513 O'NEILL, BRIAN J 1921 PALM DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2221 NORWOOD, ROBERT W NORWOOD, BARBARA A 2458 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 ADEMI, REXHEP ADEMI, RESMIJE 210 OLD COACHMAN RD S CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4405 RODRIGUEZ, JEFFREY QUILLEN, ELIZABETH A NIMPHIUS, RICHARD J RODRIGUEZ, LYDIA 2484 CHAUCER ST NIMPHIUS, KIMBERLY D 2490 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 2478 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 r :rOUHO, PASCUAL GODHO, ARISTEO 2472 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 ~YAL PASCO LLC 360 HARBOR PSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1811 FLORIDA POWER CORP FLORIDA POWER CORP PO BOX 14042 PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 SUNNY GROVE M/H PARK INC 2463 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4349 GULF TO BAY HOLDINGS LLC 901 N HERCULES AVE STE C CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2031 ORIDA POWER CORP PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 H D CLEARWATER PORTFOLIO 3625 DUFFERIN ST STE 500 DOWNSVIEW ON M3K 1N4 00030 - CANADA GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE H 409 OLD COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4410 GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition JVS OF THE H President Sondra Kerr 2498 Gulf to Bay 5200 BUFFINGTON RD PO Box 8204 FLS2006-07043 ATLANTA GA 30349 - 2998 Clearwater, F133758 ! ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OI=rxa: Box 4748, CIJ?ARWA'fIiI2~ FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SIiRVICI?S I~UILDIN'G, ~.~~ SO111'H MYI2'I'LIi /jVIiNUIi, C1.IiARWA'I'IiR, I'LORIDA 33756 'TliLiiPl-lour (727) 562-4567 Pnx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGIi PLANNING ~IiVIi1.OPM1iN'1' RIiVIIiW August 8, 2006 Mrs. Sandra L. Owens Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803 Re: FLS2006-07043 - 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard -Letter of Completeness Dear Mrs. Owens: The Planning Department has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2006-07043. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, August 31, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4547 or via email at John.Schodtler a,myclearwater.com. Sincerel `- ~ . "~ ~~ =_s~~- John Schodtler Planner II Pr~~~n I In4w,~ru, ~1;w~~r Junin D~~R,~n, CurxCii.>u:>nsr,r I I~n~~r I I:~wi;rn,~~. C~Ir~r.n_~Ie>liir:r, IDu.LJI~;~u~~~, Cun~~:n.~Ir:~nar.r. ® C:~r.Lr:~ A. I'irri;r.~L.n, C~~ru:u.~m~n+ra; „I?~ ~I,ni. I~:.~mi ~ IYwt~ r nxi ~ Ar•rn;al:~ rn'i: Ac: ru>. I?,~mL(» r:R~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1OO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: August 8, 2006 Sandra L. Owens, (863) 802-1505 c ~~\.l bert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2006-07043 ~ 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via a-mail at: robert.tefft~mvclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.n,Xclearn~ater.com ** • Aug. 08 2006 01:47PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 918638021505 Aug. 08 01:46PM 00'56 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REP~2T, PRESS 'M®VU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADImNTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE Cf~L 1-800-i~P-FAX C435-7329). r1 1118 SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE ~~~' LAKELAND, FLORIDA 33803 ~~ 863-802-1500 PHONE OLU1'[ONS, INC 863-802-1505 FAX LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ~°~ City of Clearwater Job# 6009 Date: 8-8-2006 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue AueM~°°~ Mr. John Schodtler Clearwater, Florida 33756 Pn°ne: 727-562-4865 RE' Bank Atlantic -Clearwater We are sending you: ~ Attached Via HD ^ Shop Drawings ^ Prints ^ Plans Co ies Date Number !Description ', 1 ' Original Comment Res onse Letter 1 ' Ori final Revised A lcation 14 Copies of Comment Response Letter 14 ' Co ies of Revised A lication These are transmitted as checked below: ® For Approval ^ Approved as submitted ^Other ^ For your use ^ Approved as noted ^ .For bid use Remarks: Please contact me if you have any questions or cooncerns ~ ~ , - , ~ ,tip , ~ ~ 4 ~,, , ! ; ~~ i~ I -~ ~ li i '~~ I 1 ~ ~ A!!~ ~~ gCU~~ i i_' I ~,~ ~.~..~ Copy to: File ,,,-,, w~;. c°;.,~~~.,,~;:,Y~-r, ,.q„,~ Signed: Sandra Owens All above information received by: Date: IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, PLEASE ADVISE US IMMEDIATELY ~CI1~I. QPi~T OLUTIOI~S, v August 4, 2006 Mr. John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department Municipal Services Building 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006 - 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Schodtler, We have addressed your comments as follows: 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803-1308 Phone: 863-802-1500 Fax: 863-802-1505 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~,~ i~ 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. Comment: Application Section B, Proposed Development information: Revise you "description of request" to include the specific request(a). It looks like you will be requesting an increase to the maximum building height (from ?? to ??), front setback reductions to pavement (on three frontages)(from ?? to ??), and a side setback reduction to the west (from ?? to ??) for an Off ce Use in the Commercial Zoning District. Response: Revised application accordingly. 2. Comment: Application Section E, Stormwater Plan Submittal Requirements, has not been completed as an acknowledgment of the stormwater plan requirements, requires the applicant to initial, not check off. Response: Revised application accordingly. 3. Comment: Application Section G, Site Plan Requirements, states that the site plan shall include -All dimensions (dimension to the main covered entry form the Old Coachman Property line); and -All required Site triangles. Response: The dimensioned site plan is located in the plan set on sheet C-3.0, all Dimensions are shown on this plan sheet. The required site triangles were inadvertently Left off the plan, understanding that development services will have additional comments, we respectfully request that the original plans submitted be reviewed and allow this comment to stand as the first plan review comment. We ask that you do this in the interest of saving time and plan set copy fees, given the large number of plans required for review. Please contact me soon as possible to confirm that this is acceptable. ~"' • • 4. Comment: Application Section K, Traffic Impact Study, has not been completed as an acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements requires the applicant to initial not check off. Response: Revised application accordingly. S. Comment: Application Section L, Fire Flow Calculations/GYater Study Submittal Requirements has not been completed as an acknowledgement of Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study requirements, requires the applicant to initial, not check off. Response: Revised application accordingly. 6. Comment: Application Section N, Affidavit to Authorize Agent Requirement #3 has not been completed on either page. Response: Revised application accordingly. Please find revised applications attached to this letter. Contact me as soon as possible should have additional questions or concerns regarding this submission. Sincerely, Sandra L. Owens President Cc: Job file. ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,J~ 0 8 2~(~6 PLANNING DEI~At~~t.r„1f'hi~ CITY OF CLEARVJ,~TEi~ `'Clearwater • CASE #: RECEIVED 8Y {staff initials): !DATE R'ECE!IVED: ~ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^~ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets /Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 475.00 * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD I)EVELOPIVIEN'I' AFPL: CA'~'~ OAT (Revised 04/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT II!NFORMATIO'N; {'Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY owNER(s): LEO J JR. MURPHY., JOSEPH P MURPHY List ALL owners on the deed MICHAEL V MURPHY CHARLOTTE A MURPHY AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Joseph Murphy ~a a_z~~_~Q~~ DEPAfdlivi±:Nl Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. (Sandra Owens) 1118 South Florida Avenue, Lakeland, Florida 33803 863-802-1500 FAX NUMBER: g63-802-1505 E-MAIL ADDRESS: Sandra.OWenSna cdsincmail.com B. PROPOSED PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .OPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Bank Atlantic PROJECT VALUATION: $ 700,000 18-29-16-00000-130-0910 & 18-29-16-00000-130-1000 0.96 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 41,970 sq. ft. PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Speafically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of nonresidential use and ail requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, spedfic use, etc.) • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone : 727 ~S 62-4567 Fax: 727~i62-4865 We will be requesting an increase #o maximum bu9ding 'height from 25' to 34'-21/8" front setback reductions to pavement (on three frontages) from 25' to 15', and a side set a~ck r~~lon tot a west from 10 to 5 or an ice se rn t e Commercial ~tno Page 1 of 7 • • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (t'DR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NQQ ('rf yes, ariach a copy of the applicable dowments) . C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^/ Provide complete responses to the six (ti) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA-Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which d is located. It is the interest of the proposed project to maintain harmony with its surroundings. We are proposing a building that respects the structural ~f~le that_prer_lnminatp~jn the Pnvjrppr]leAtjll~lil~]jt1SjOSatP.d.~NP arknowlPdgQ?ndl3ppfefdBteJt1]at flw hori~c~Atal_Otbef than the v i al design of the city is what prevails and we must value this setting. That is why we are choosing to recommend the use of a bank at this location, SefYing~S~IIlhE711sbment for Chic hi_y__ ah~v trav~led~ra it _v~arri and~dd~g a hr~ilding that t1c~c rnnt_pyE(~y}~Jpl.tfleS~+n-raanairg c +r1~+rrc~ with designed green areas, a more attractive site triangle and with the primary interest that this 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The Bank has a very upscale appearance, using neutral colors, "marble fnish" and barrel file at each tower. Enhanced landscaping is also proposed. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or pennons residing or working in the neighbofiood of the proposed use. The proposed use is a new Bank Atlantic facility. Bank Atlantic wild not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the area due to the nature of the business, they will instead offer convenience to persons living or working in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minim¢e traffic congestion. Bank Atlantic is open 7 days a week 9 am to 9 pm this eliminates the need to "rush" to the bank. Our site has been designed to optimize traffic flow and will have on site directional sjgnage. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vianity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed project is surrounded on its West side by a Commercial/Retail building, on its 5oufh and East sldes~y major an we nown In ras ruc ure as I is u o ay v an oar man roa an er more y commercial/ retail properties such as Home Depot and on the rear Eby a residential community.. This development is consistent with the commercial character that prevails on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and respects the calm nature -of~hE-residerttiai~r~ea-tha ' 6. The design ofi the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acouslic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The nature of the proposed business does not create a lot of noise. The building has been designed to be visually pleasing and inviting, in addition, this site wiN have substantial landscaping to soften the impact of parking, drive isles and the building itself. ORIGINAL KtC;tIVED ~~~ o s Zoos Page2of7 PLANNING DEPARTivIEoJT CITY OF CLEARW,'~TIR • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ', Q/ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the speafic Use as Misted in each Zoning District to which the waiver is i requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: ', E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Ciity of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BiE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. A11 applications that BnvoNe addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and munidpal storm systems; Proposed stonnwater detention/retention area inducting top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan inducting all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stomtwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTt~3W1=ST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable C WLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN 'REQIf IREMENTS {Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. Ai a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE 'REQUIRE'MENT FOR A STORMWATER Pl~4N AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST 'BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.Aj SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by specles, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; On SUNey TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip dines) and ', condition of such trees; See Landscape Plan n LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards {ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study strap be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering princlples. The findings of the study will be used in detennining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Trip Generation Report Enclosed GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building pe-mits wll not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Unity of Title Enclosed RECEIVED Page 3 of 7 f\,. t~ O p ~oOr PLANNING LaEt•~,=. .,r+..;~i"i CITY OF C:LI:,~tR~,~;,~°F~~a G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) Q/ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referendng individual sheets incuded in package; 0 North arrow; Q Engineering bar scale {minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; 0/ All dimensions; [~/ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; DEMO PLAN 0 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Q All required setbacks; Q All existing and proposed points of access; 0 All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and spedmen trees, induding NIA description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildl'~fe habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Q Location of all street rights-oFiroay within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, induding fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas Q and waterlines; 0 All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Q Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot intervr landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening Q {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701 }; [~/ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stomrwater management fadlifies; 0 Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Q Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Q/ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in wriften/tabutar form: Q_ Land area in square feet and aces; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Q Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Q Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the Q number of required spaces; Total paved area, inducting all paved parking spaces & driveways, Q expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Offidal records book and page numbers of all existing utility Q easement; [/ Building and structure heights; 0 Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and /0 Floor area ratio (F.A.RJ for all nonresidential uses. EXISTING ~QtfI~D 41,~J70 -wand 41,970 sq.ft. and sq• 9.9S~es 0.96 acres 1 N/A 1 N/A 17 REQ. 18,333.74 or 43.70% 80% N/A Unknown 43.70% Q REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); ^/ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: N~A Q One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; (~]/ Offsite elevations ff required to evaluate the proposed stomtwater management for the parcel; 0 All open space areas; Q Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Q Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Q Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Q Structural overhangs; 4100 sq. ft. 30 PROPOSED- . SEE SITE PLAN 24,364.10 SQ. FT S~~O~SJT~~ 34' 67.85% 0.09 ORIGINAL Page 4 of 7 ~,~~ 0 8 2006 PLANNING ~1=Nk~t~l`~/ir:f~l1' CITY OF CLEAf~'~N,~TFR . • • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Section 41102.A} ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x36"): 0 All existing and proposed structures; 0 Names of abutting streets; 0 Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Q Sight visibility triangles; ~/ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on~ite and immediately adjacent to the site, by specles, size and locations, including dripiines (as indicated on required Q tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indipting the s¢e, description, specifications, quantities, and sparing requirements of atl 0 existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typigl planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants inducting instnictions, sdl mixes, baddilling, mulching and [~ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatd~ed andlor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and 0 percentage covered; NIA Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); 0 Irrigation notes. ^/ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'h X 11 }; ^ COMPREHENSNE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape assoclated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where miriimwm Code well not be met I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4 202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: Q All sides of all buildings; ^/ Dimensions; 0 Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and Q Materials. ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as atmve to scale on 8'/z X 11. J. SIGNAGE: {Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-18fl6) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and climensrons (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. A'~ p ^~ All ti20POSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inducting location, size, height, colors, materats and drawing freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable {separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECEIVEQ r.l ~>; ~ 8 2006 Page 5 of 7 FI.ANIVIhtt ~ ;~ ~.1~'r . ~ CITY C3i .:;~`~~IKVv':=~r,.:lc K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4801.C) ^ Include ff required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or'rf the proposed development ^ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips ,per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or iintersection with five (5) reporta'b1e accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (fTE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Sloping Meeting" hctd with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and posPdevelopmentlevels of service for all _ _ roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identfied in the Scoping Meeting. ~~_ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW 'RESULTS IN THE ~REQUIREME'~NT FOR A TRA!F!FIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPI_ICATIO'N MUST BCE RESUB'MITTEfl AiND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Pubfic Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. Trip Generation Report Provided L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Flre Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this Project. The water supply must be able !o support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fin: pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to sup,p1y 150% of its rated gpacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement offire flow c~culations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): {l Fire Flow CalculationsM/ater Study is included. ~~ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. cauTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION IMUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY !MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Flre Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, adknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and pho raph the property described in this application. Signature of property er or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF 1 It• Sworn o and su scribed before me this ~/1 S A.D. 20 , ~~ as My commission expires: ~~-6 day of by MY CCMIvIISSICN tt DD 417377 EXPIRES: April 11, 2009 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 6 of 7 ~,zG 0 8 2006 PLANNING t~i"I'ARTNIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: LEO J . I~iURP~~iY, JR . CHARLOTTE A . N!URP~iY CHARLOTTE Y. A:URPHY 2. That (I am'we are) the owner(s) and record tide holder(s) of the following described property {address or general location): 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Clearwtar, Florida 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Sandra Owens; Wanda Fabre; Yohansi Santana; Marsha Mccollam as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City ofi Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. Th i (Uwe), the undersi n d autho ' hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner' Property ne Property w er Property Owner STATE OF~f~~~~; NEw YORK COUNTY OF ~ ALLE GANY New York Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of ~odda, on this 3 0 trl da of June Charlotte Y. p ~ ~ C ar o e N~urphy Mur perysonally appeared - ~~•~•••~h•-- ~ • °~'urphy who having been first duly sworn eo urp i~~r . eposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavitthat he/she signed. ~ r,s ~ ~ v i ~' tiit ' ~ut~;,,: „h; .. , :. Zbc~- Notary Public ignatur Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: 3 ~~ ~~ T ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~,~,~~ ~ 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CIEARWATER ?006 C N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: n~:.ICIiALL V. i~iL'R1~I~~' 2. That (I am'we are) the owner{s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Clearwtar9 Florida 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) Flex~~~,l~ S~e~~da~d peve~opw~e~~ S;~e ~'la~ ~~~Pvuv~t ~ as P ~ea u e s ~- a ~- v~ Se_c..'~`~ o r ~ ~~ ~l s a n ao ~~ r c+ ~', h 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Sandra owens; Wanda Fabre; Yohansi Santana; Marsha Mccoilam as (his/their) agent{s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such pe5tion; 5. Thai this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (l/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. YJ-~~ U~ Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTYOF2~R6 Volusia B ore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~~ day of , j~~ 1 iy _ personally appeared :~; i chae 1 V . ~'urphy who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ~j~~.,v.c.oc~ i'C.. ~C9-~-~-~J ~ rU, Lol ~ - 55 ~-~f"~ -3 I .. a~`~rP4`~h SUSAN Ah. URIBE ~~//~~ ~~ ~~~ MY COMMISSION # DD 324415 ~% ~~'t~'w`~_. ~oF lea EXPIRES: June 29, 2008 Notary Public Signature Nota Seal/ i-HDD3-NOTARY FL rotary Discount Assoc. Co. rY My Commission Expires: ~ . ~ ~j' - OS' ORIGINAL RECEIVED e;~~8 0 8 2006 PLANNING (~EpARTMENT CITY OF CLEARINATER 'Clearwater July 31, 2006 . ~' t CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER,. FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM Commerical Development Solutions 1118 S Florida Avenue Lakeland, Fl 33803 ,G'~ ~ nt ; SA n~ ~A O H3~15 RE: FLS2006-07043 -- 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Commerical Development Solutions The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2006-07043. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Application Section B, Proposed Development Information: Revise your "description of request" to include the specific request(s). It looks like you will be requesting an increase to maximum building height (from ?? to ??), front setback reductions to pavement (on three frontages)(from ?? to ??), and a side setback reduction to the west (from ?? to ??) for an Office Use in the Commercial Zoning District. 2. Application Section E, Stormwater Plan Submittal Requirements, has not been completed as an acknowledgment of stormwater plan requirements requires the applicant to initial, not check off. _ 3. Application Section G, Site Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the site plan shall include: -All dimensions (dimension to the main covered entry from the Old Coachman property line); and -All required site triangles. 4. Application Section K, Traffic Impact Study, has not been completed as an acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements requires the applicant to initial, not check off. 5. Application Section L, Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study Submittal Requirements, has not been completed as an acknowledgment of Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study requirements requires the applicant to initial, not check off. 6. Application Section N, Affidavit to Authorize Agent Requirement #3, has not been completed on either page. Section 4-202 of the, Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, August 8, 2006 (12:00 Noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Letter of Incompleteness - FLS2.006-07043' 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD ~ ~r ~ • Jul. 31 2006 01:16PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES- RESULT 01 918638021505 Ju1.31 01:15PM 00'52 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #84. TFIEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADUAhffF~ ASSISTANCE, PLEAS CALL 1-8H0-FIELP-FAX C435-73291. 14I1VI~CII~EL OPIi~~PT OLUTIORS, Il January 23, 2007 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803-1308 Phone:863-802-1500 Fax: 863-802-1505 ®~~~in1A~ R1~i~I~ED Mr. Steve Everitt JAN 2 3 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department PLANNING DEPARTMENT Municipal Services Building CITY OF CIEARWATER 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006 - 249$ Gulf to Bay Blvd -Response to unmet Criterion Questions Dear Mr. Everitt, As you know we have a project that is pending approval due to Mr. John Schodtler's absence. He did not complete his review of the previously submitted plans but did have the following comments with regards to the General Criteria Questions: 1. Comment 12/29/07 -Your recent response did not demonstrate how the proposed increase in building height is characteristic of the neighboring property, Uniform City. This criterion is looking specifically at the adjacent properties only, not ones within walking distance. Response: General Applicability Criteria #1 The immediately adjacent property is Uniform City, which is an older building with a flat roof and a fagade. The top of the fagade from grade is 20.46'. The proposed building likewise has a flat roof with a fagade of 20'-1". But for the two towers, the proposed building is consistent with the scale, bulk, and character of Uniform City. Those architectural enhancements are within the 35-foot limitation of the Flexible Development Standard Guidelines. Further, even though the towers exceed 25 feet, the overall character of the proposed building is essentially horizontal, which is also consistent with Uniform City. As discussed in General Applicability Criteria #5 below, the architectural enhancements are consistent with the other buildings in the immediate vicinity as well. 2. Comment: Your response to this criterion has not been sufficiently addressed. The Wachovia Bank located at 2699 Gulf to Bay is in compliance for building height based on the primary roof structure being a pitched roof and not a flat roof as proposed here. Response: General Applicability Criteria #5 Per your request, we have gathered elevation data and photographs of other buildings in the immediate vicinity (within sight distance) of the subject property. The surveys and photographs are attached. Three of those buildings exceed 25': Home Depot (2495 Gulf to Bay): 28.72' Sam's Club (2575 Gulf to Bay): 34.37' Tampa Tribune (2560 Gulf to Bay): 39.52' (Another building just beyond the line of sight at the subject property is Wachovia Bank, located at 2363 Gulf to Bay. We do not have an elevation survey of that building, but it appears to exceed 25'. (See photograph).) Other buildings in the immediate vicinity include the Chik-Fil-A Restaurant (2516 Gulf to Bay) at 24.46', and Dunkin' Donuts (2551 Gulf to Bay) at 22.73'. They are consistent with the proposed building in that they have flat roofs with "tower" facades. While both are less than 25' in height, because they are relatively narrow and therefore primarily vertical in character, they appear to be taller than they actually are. That is particularly true of Chick-Fil-A, which is the next building to the east of the subject property. The proposed building thus combines the characteristics of all of the surrounding buildings. It essentially creates a transition between the old (Uniform City's fiat roof and horizontal character) and the new (the other buildings' heights and vertical elements). There are two (2) other comments that were addressed with the previous plan submission but were not reviewed/signed off on by Mr. Schodtler, they are asfollows -the responses provided are the same as those provided on the most recent plan submission. Zoning Comments: Comment: The parking counts as indicated in "Parking Provided " on page C-2 appear to be inconsistent with the proposed site plan. 11/13/06: The plan shows 21- 9 x 18 spaces and the table indicates 22 spaces. 7/31/06 The plan shows 19 - 9 x 19 spaces, 9 - 9 x 20 spaces, and 2 -12 x 20 HC spaces. Revise one or the other. Response: The parking data chart has been modified to match the plans (See C-2 for details.) 2. Comment: NOTE: The sign plans are inconsistent. The site plan shows the freestanding signs at 25 feet in height and the freestanding sign elevation states 14 feet in height. The Site plan C-2 says one freestanding sign is 14 feet in height and the other 25 feet. No need to revise for this site plan approval. But the plans will need to be consistent for the CSP, building and sign permits. Response: Revised pole sign note on signage plan to 14 ft. high to match detail and site plan. Please review these items as soon as possible as this project was scheduled for construction in March 07, however, since our building plans have not been reviewed at this time our timeline is being forced out. Thank you in advance for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, ~~~~ ~j , I~~CEI~cR C~~--~- 2 3 200fi andra L. Owens JAN President p1ANNING BEPP3~TM~N~ C1Tf OF GLEARWAIER Cc: K.C. Bouchillon, Attorney at Law File Uniform City to be viewed with Criteria #1 Explanation J~x ~: - ~a~. . Building Height 20.46' Home Depot Photo (1 of 3) to be view with Criteria #~ Exi~lanatic~n ~,.. i~ :. Building Height 28.72' ORIGINAL 1 RECENE~ .IAA 2 3 2006 PLANNING dEPAItTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~.. ~;. i ~ Home Depot Photo (2 of 3) to be vie~~ ~~ith Criteria #S Exulanation ~~ ~... i 3 Building Height 28.72' Home Deuot Photo (3 of 3) to be view with Criteria #S Exulanation ~ ~' ~. Building Height 28.72' ORIGINAL RECEIVER 2 •kAN ~ 3 2(~0~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATI<I~ • Sam's Club Photo (1 of 3) to be view with Criteria #5 Exulanafion ~' i. F tn' ..•. _.~ Building Height 34.37' 3 Building Height 34.37' Sam's Club Photo (2 of 3) to be view with Criteria #5 Exulanation • • tiara's Club Photo (3 of 3) to be view with Criteria #5 Explanation Tampa Tribune Photo (1 of 2) to be view with Criteria #5 Explanation /~ #: ~, t "~ .~~ f ~ _. ` _. _ ~4,: - - - .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~.. s ._ .... ~_ :_. ~~y:w.. ~. _. Building Height 39.52' ORIGINAL 4 ~ECENED ~~ f~,~ 2 ~ 2(~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAIEN Building Height 34.37' • • Tampa Tribune Photo (2 of 21 to be view with Criteria #~ E~~~lanation ~~ .~ ®~ .... ~e1 r '~ - 3.e, _ ,_ ~.-.- ,::...1M~ .._ _ . Building Height 39.52' Wachovia Bank Photo (1 of 2) to be view with Criteria #5 Explanation 1 -- ~ f ~ Building Height not verified, however since the building is 2 story it is higher than 25' to the top of the structure. ®RIGIfW4Q ~ECENED 5 -; `~ ~ 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLE4RVygTEFi W~achovia Bank Photo (2 of 2) to be view with Criteria #5 Explanation r `` //,, , Building Height not verified, however since the building is 2 story it is higher than 25' to the top of the structure. Chile-Fil-A Photo (1 of 2) to be view with Criteria #5 Explanation '~~ ~.. • : ~ ~ +~ r~ ORIGINAL RECENED s ~ °~ 2 3 2[~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF GLEARWATER Building Height 24.46' • Chik-Fil-A Photo (2 of 2) to be view with Criteria #5 Eanlanation Building Height 24.46' Dunkin Donuts Photo (1 of 1) to be view with Criteria #S E~pl~~nation ?~..~ i ~~ ,~._-__ ~~~ I ~'~~ Building Height 22.73' - ORIGINAL ~~CEIVED ®~! 23 2L~06 PLANNING DEPARTMEN'M CITY OF ClEARWA7~t7 T __ __ ~} 1. Photos for Reference -Various Banl:~tlantic Locations ~1~ ~~ ~- ~,~ ~_ ~ urn a~ s ~.. ~ ~ r ORIGINAL. RECEIVE'p PLANNING DEPARTMENT' CITY OF CLEARH/ATfsfi ~~~ !ter- 4~ ` ._A~s ~- ~~i .~ fl . ~ `~~'b+,i~~ ~'iW, ~ARwv.~ ...... Grand Opening 0 _~ Celebration ~~l~ ~~ y ~rY~ t ~~ '~"+-- ..~_ s < 9 RECENEIa ~ P,I 2 ~ 2[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Proposed BrurkAtlantic .Site as it exists D A ~ ~=C ~~~ o ~ -Tl ~ D D 3 { Z Q v^~ 2 D 4 = ~~ mA~ vv e 0 N m z 0 m m 0 r D Z C7 D m D Z Q ~_ --I m v i ~z ~ ~ _ ~ T ~ .a IT , C7 ~ ~ m m m rP _ < ~y o m 0 ~ ~ m m ~ Z !, D N O II Q 0 p~~ I ~ ~ I IE~ .. Y /r/ a '~" ~ u~= ~ 7=11' I?4 4 UR~~E~ iHRU ~, ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ a - ~ ~- ~ ~ ~. \.,;%~ 1 t _~~L~~ ~ ~~ : ~ 11~ ~~~ ~ _ '~ ~ L , ' OLD COACHMAN ROAD fO' ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2' WNC CUTTER 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY asPHALr PAYENENT ~+ ,' N ~_ i-< ~ ~ ~ `== ~~ i Q ~~ O N 1, m ~~~r QLx ~n~S l ~~;~ ~~~~ ~~~~ r~ m -~ Otii 13/LUUb •l~U~ 14;14 t'Ab 4U 14Lb8ULL L1L1, -~~ ` •'•; r c t~UU4i UUL ~~ . %~` - ilaayunta::a!t:ni):rrc:r:ri,q I parw!x3 i '~~:~:%~'`r'r"~~~'~~''>'~ \_`_ - `.,'~ . . Bank Atlantic- Clearwater, Florida TRiP GENERAT~QN •~Y~~ ;~~vY'•~~:.:':~;. s:l;- - ...r,^n..: sa a~'•M - ..'rr;; :o "!~` ~-~'.^wy,~^r _ ,.,•~;; :~:ia y yy t - ~ ri r• J ~ •::>::. c'r - ,,.,.. .;i~a -I13r• .C~Tcsi ~ =-~ ;~: ~i~ , p"eSIG's~ ~ ~.., , i., . ~~~.~` `alt;;: i~MF~~~ : : _ ".~•,:. ~:=ry • ~V _ - J, .n : ;~:~/•' a, •~.:.N•. ti' ..:.:: _ ~r ; :~+.. :~~; i<• ~ ~` .p~ ^~r ~ ~ iiyt•.. r..: •,;: ..t .Y ~h ~• '~•'" ' u ~~` ;•.,r v ;~ - .r ~~• sA• : '~~~. rJ. :, ~i~ +~:ir+r-~ ~ 's1) ,~`.. V'~~`r _ r ' tn ~> ~ia> :`' ~~ ; Y y: ,. `=~n:~ ~°: ~~Oaf ~_ ~~. ` %N:~ ~ : !'.. .may .rN~tY `::\: ~ ~~~-! r/ ~ ~,~ rn: • _ ..~ti w~.n ~;~ . . < ~ t:,:.:~ .,.r/.x ;!\:~. :;,J': ^' ry.n - J . I . , u :, !'1:.i .,. . - - . . -: : s . ~' ^~ :v • • + r ::%% ^ ` ^ . :r " . ^ "~^s, ',v . i - • ~ `• •' :^ ~ • l7rive-in 4,lflOsq. fl. IS2.R5 G.GS b.GS I,OII 94 94 475 44 4~ 53G SO SO Sank ~~ SAw'ce: 1.TEC-June 2000 ORIGINAL RECENED ,~UL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' Pct' 1.000 sq, ft.- I•hE ,i,t•ip G~nct'ation -- Tt' ~ci. -Site hay twq drive-thru lanes; trip generatiu~t based on. I,-nes is Iower than - hascd nn sq. fl. '~ 47% passerby rate fi~am ITG Trip Generation I'iandbook- l-ab3e 5.2U: Drive-in Hank .•• ~•.•~ ~ uvq l,try I tK (~ROU ~~ ~ ~ i P!_gNNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AllEN~, 2ND FLOOR ~?r~~ CLEARWATER. Fl.. 33756 PHONE• 72T-562.g567~ FqX. 727.,62-4865 D~~TroN o~ uxr~ of ~~ Property Owner; (o Property Address: T~x ,~~ 18/~9/i /00000/ 30 09 0 /00000/~30~.~ 2498 Gul - ~_-:.~,OE~- _ ~ ~ __ - lwOw Ol+ ALL MEN By -to-Bay Boulevard, C1.ea a-ter ~ ~~/.,~ panaittiug to the issuance of build. lug pe~~ ~ 5, that pta~ant to the o~iii~,o~ of the City of Clearwater fee owner (s) of due foll~,~ ~~ tend devetep~ activiti gt~ t]te State of Florida. rn wit: $ descat'bed t+eel prope~y ~~ im fire City of Cleatwat~er Courtly of Pin attached do hereby otalce the following declaration of conditions, and ~ ~, known end itr=fe;med to as a DECLARATION OF U1VIT'Y OF TITI, nrstrrc6ons °n said lands, hereafter to be E, as to the following particulars: l • That the aforesaid plot or combitrati~ of het+calt;er be regarded as and is karate lots, ply' melts acrcege or portions ~~~~ ~ ~hY dared to be oni£ed under one title as an ittdp+is~'ble buildnag site. Z. That the said p!'olJerty shall henceforth be considcned ~ shall ba sold, assigned, as one plot or p~ of land, and that no portion plot or parcel of lend ~' corrveyed or devised trepsrate~, ~~ ;~. its ~~,, ~ one 3• 'That this Declaration of and shall be bin ' u ~~' of Title shall constitute a coveoaot ~ nm with the land as patties claimin ~ p~ the undetsignod, end the heirs, successoty and a ptrnrided by law, g tinder than emtil sucb dine as the same ore be rel ssigas ~~ undetsigtted, and all City Manager ~ the City of ~~~~ also agri+ee(} than this~dnt shall be t+ecotded is the blic itecords of Signed GeaF wituessed aed acloitowl ~ ~ da of ~2 edged this y C Oss,tv,~ ,zoUS owNEx ~s~; t~.4,~,~, STRT$ OF r Ver'i~1 ' ~+~}Qi COVNTy OF lqg Y (~~~ T~l~6~S insaurnent was aekaowlcdmcd bcfo~e roe oPwhom the irtstrumcrtt suns exeixited. AURELIA MORACE3 Notary Public, State of NewYotk Reg. #01 M06058403 ~t~Y iPUbric Sigrmty~ Qualified in Rockland County Certificate Filed in Westchester ~~ °f NotsryPruued t:ommission Expires: NotaryCommissiaaiVUroDet; ~'~ (~ ~., j~/ S~`/J~ SEAL A$O [-'' ~ tortorova yr v+fl~aoed;aenu J f+~ion ~t t/F.1D~ I ~I1ISP~ PAGE 02 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • , tir a • )5120257 R LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A PARCEL A: From the Sou=heart corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Kang~ 16 East, run thence North 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds East, along the 40 acre lire, 5G.0 feet for a POINT OF HEGIlv"VING; thence North 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., along the 40 acre line, 15G.0 feet, t'~ence North 69 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds West, 250.0 feet thence Soutr 1 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West 150.0 feet to the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds East, along the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard 150.0 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, Pinellas Co•.uity, Florida. TAX PARCEL N0. 18/29/16/00000/130/1000 PARCEL H The East 150 feet of the North 130 feet of the East 256.7 fee of the South 330 feet or the Sout:west Quarter(S~T 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter(NE 1/4) o° Section 1fi, Township 29 South Range 16 East, being more particularily described as follows: From tre Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Ra:~ge 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 1334.57 feet along the East-West centerline of said Section 18 to the 40 acre line; thence along said ~0 acre line run N., 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 second$ E., 330.0 feet for a POZNT OF BEGINNING; said P.O.B. being the Southwest corner of the intersection. of Shelley Street and Old Coachman Road(C.R. No. 32); thence fro:r said POINT OF BEGINNING, run N., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 secor_ds W., 150.0 feet, along the South line of said Shelley Street; thence rur. South ]. degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds W., 130.0 feet; thence run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 150.0 feet to said 40 acre line; thence with said 40 acre line, run N., 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., 130.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TAX PARCEL NO. 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~1L 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 11/30/2005 14:10 8139688029 SHOPPING CENTER GROU ... ~~• ~ ~ i PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ _ • ~ 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727-66Z-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 AECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE PropcrtyOwner: CHARLOTTE Y. Iv1URPHY 2498 Giiilfi~•-la -~B __yy~ Boulev rd, Clearwater Property Address: _ TAk IiL~1, 8.,~~Q,~r.G !~.O.M,~~,LCL~ 11L Tax_ID # 1.8/29/16/00000/130/1000 KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PlL85ENT5, that pursuant to the or~dmances of the City of Clearwater pertaitnittg to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the tmdersigoed, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, Cotuaty of Pinellas and Stare of Florida, to wit: a t t a shed do hcneby make the following declaration of coo.ditions, liomitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE. as to the following patticttlars: That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof., shall hereafter, be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible buildvag siUe. Z. That the said property shall henceforth be considcr+ed as oae plot or parcel of land. and that no portion thcroof shall be sold, assigned, transferrod; coonveyed or devised separately except in. its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant m nm with the land, as provided by law, and shall. be binding upon the tradersigaod; and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned. and all patties claiming under them undl such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undtxsigtxed. also agt~ee(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas Cotutty, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acltttowledged this ~c~'~lt day of ~ ~~1~ , 20 D ~o at Clearwater. Florida. OWNER (S): ('.Pre r~~-e t-P . ~l ,t s..t STATE OF PI~ID7~ mot, 1! v l (` ~ COVNtTY OF :':::~~_.__ G/-~ T~Yl~uti~, The forcQofitQ instnunau wos aeknowled before me Ufis ~~ day of vn behalf of whom the instrumtat was executed. a • IQotery Public Si~tute • ~ ~ ~~~/~ ~ • ~~( Namc of Notary Primed Notary Cammission Number. , ~,~,..,. SHARYN A. GAREY • •-rvv~~l-RFibl)C~ta#e-AfA{AN~~IOd~ SEAT. Ai1f0 Pcrsondty known or . 4~9•1i220 Comtnleitlon lrxt+'s~aR 05-11-~p ORIGINAL RECEIVED .~~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'j.. ," ~ ,45120257 R LEGAL DES^.RI PTIOi~' EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A PARCEL A: From the Sou=heart corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run thence North 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds Eaet, along the 40 acre lire, 50.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds E., along the 40 acre line, 15x.0 feet, t:'ience Ncrth 89 degrees 41 minu*es 18 seconds West, 150.0 feet thence South 1 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West 150.0 feet to the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds East, along the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard 150.0 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, Pinellas County, Florida. TAX PARCEL N0. 18/29/16/00000/130/1000 PARCEL 8: The East 150 feet of the North 130 feet of the East 256.7 fee of the South 330 feet o` the Sout; west Quarter (S+~i 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter(NE 1/4) o° Section 16, Township 29 South Range 16 East, being more particularily de3cribed as follows: From tre Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Ra:.ge 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 1334.57 feet along the East-West centerline of said Section 18 to the 40 acre line; thence along said ~0 acre line run N., 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., 330.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; said P.O.B. being the Southwest corner of the intersection of Shelley Street and Old Coac'rman Road(C.R. No. 32); thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING, run N., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 secor_ds W., 150.0 feet, along the South line of said Shelley Street; thence rur. South 1 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds W., 130.0 feet; thence run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 150.0 feet to $aid 40 acre line; thence with said 40 acre line, run N., 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., 130.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TAX PARCEL NO. 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727~6Z~567; FAX: 727-562-4865 AECLARA'I'ION OF UNITY OF TITLE Property Owrter: LEO J. MiJRPHY, JR. Tax Ill 0000 130 091.0 Property Address: ~ `- 9 4 (, +,~. t ~ ~ a /t~¢ y. ~ u vcRv~ ~~ c tr~,n,~ w ~, , ~ l.,,A ~ Tax ID # 1.8/29/16/00000/].30/1000 KNOW OP ALL MEN BY TFIESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the nndersietted, being dre See owner (s) of the following described real property situated is the City of Clearwater, County of PinelLls and Stare of Florida, to wit: attache d do hereby »talce the following dcclaratioa of conditions, limitations and restridiorts on said lands, her~eaRer to be ]mown end referred to as t: DiCLA~ATION OF U'N'ITY OF TT17.E, a.4 to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hercaRet be regarded as and is htaeby declared to be uni5ed under one title as an indivisible building site. Z. That the said property shall htnicefOrth be considered as one plot or parcel of land. and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed of devised separately except uo. its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land. 3. Thai this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant m nm with the land, as provided by law, and.shall. be binding upon.the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the twdersigned, and all patties claiming under them until such tiume as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the Ciry of Clearwater. The undersigned; also agree(s) that this instrttrr-ent shall be . rer~ded in tfic public records of Pinellas CowoRy, Florida Sigloed, sealed, witnessed and acltnowledged this / ~`~ ~-~ day of ~l t9 d`C ~ , 20 aG . at . ~ t` L s+-~ O w ~ rL ('~,,, ct V T ~ / , I' /~~ WITNP.SSES: Cam. A ~ A ~~~.~.. OWNER (S): C.. >< u 3 . w• v ,-a° e `t '' R STATEOFX NeW York COUNTY OF 9C Ac~,celslr-~ DEBORAH K. HUNTER NOTARY PUBLIC, 3TATi: OP ~~W YORK QUALIFIED IN ALLEGAN'f COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 9/d0/ZOQ,~„ (mown X or produced identification ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~lJL 14 2006 Thc rarngo'trig instnuneat was acknowledged before me this ~dny of ll~ v~ r~ . 20 c~ C , by 4 ~-U .1 iN~,~ r p~ a. ~ ~~~ on bdwlf of whom the instcumrnt ~raty~ex~e_~uted. ~.~t ~~ ~ M (.l~~ ~/`~ Notary Public Signdvle a.7 ~ ~ Q t2 ?~ ~ k . ~ w ~ T ~ ~' `/ Namc of Notary Printed Notary Commission Number. „_ of ~"~~. y 7 7 ~ ~ ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER - 'L S )5120257 R LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A PARCEL A: Frvm the Sou=heart corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Yun thence North 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds East, along the 40 acre lire, 5G.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGIIv'VING; thence North 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds E., along the 40 sere line, 15x.0 feet, thence North 89 degrees 41 minu*es 18 seconds West, 150.0 feet thence South 1 degrees 01 minutes 28 seCOndB West 150.0 feet to the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, thence Sout'z 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds East, along the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Say Boulevard 150.0 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, Pinellas County, Florida. TAX PARCEL N0. 18/29/16/00000/130/1000 PARCEL B: The East 150 feet of the North 130 feet of the East 256.7 feet of the South 330 feet or the Southwest Quarter(SN 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter(NE 1/4) o° Section 18, Township 29 South Range 16 East, being more particularily described as follows: From tre Southwea~ corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Rage 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 1334.57 feet along the East-West centerline of said Section 18 to the 40 acre line; thence along said ~0 acre line run N., 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., 330.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; said P.O.B. being the Southwest corner of the intersection of S*:elley Street and Old Coachman Road{C.R. No. 32) ; thence fro:r. said POINT OF BEGINNING, run N., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 secor_ds W., 150.0 feet, along the South line of said Shelley Street; thence rur. South ]. degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds W., 130.C feet; thence run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 150.0 feet to said 40 acre line; thence with said 40 acre line, run N., 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds E., 130.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TAX PARCEL NO. 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED ~lJL 1 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTLVLcNT CITY OF CLEARW~~TER , ~ . • . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"~ FLOOR - ~, CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 72T-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE Property Ow.>aer: MICHAEL V . MURPHY Property Address: 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Clearwater TAX ID# 18 29 1,6 00000 130 0 an Tax ID ~ 6/16/00000/130/1000 KNOW pF ALL MEN BY THE$>~ 1'1~SEIVI'S, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pczt<li,n;ng to the issnence of building pemoits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being tine fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Cleatwaler, County of Pinellas and State of florida. to wit do het+cby make the following declaration of eon.ditions, lnmitations a~ restrictioav on said lands, hereafter to be known a»d referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforrrsaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions theroo~ shall hereafter be regarded as ands hereby declas>rd to be uru5ed under one title as an indivisible building site. Z. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one pint or parcel of land, and that no ptlrtion thc~pf shall be sold, assigned, transferred, coxrveyed or devised separately except ~. its entirety, as one plot or parcel of lend. 3. That this Doclazation of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as pr~avided by law, and shalt be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parnies claiming ~~' thctrl until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of dre City of Clearwater. The undersiggrd also agr+ee{s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas Couaty, Florida, Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this ~~- day of ~ //L~ , ZO o i- ,,a~r, Florida. °~ duo ~c~~t~-- ~ ` , WITTVESSES: y~,(~~ ~ OWNER (S):'Ky~1~ / _ ,l V• STATE OF PLORtDA ~t COVN7Y C1F-PfliPL~tg V t'~i~~$t /,~}` The farr~q_ iospumat7A rJ ac. owled ,~] an a f whom the inshumtx-t was ex ' ~~~ „`~ DALE M. SIMMONS Notary Public S-inwture o c Notary Public, State of Florida My comm. expires July 31, 2006 - ~. ~~' ~ - Gt/~V(/` ~ ~ Name of Alotary Printed No. DD 138196 Notmy Commission Number ____ Q~ S''t'/}-yl/I n IQtown -.. or ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~UL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER J I 5120257 R LEGAL DESCRIPTIO)v' EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A , PARCEL A: From the Southeast corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Kange 16 East, run thence North 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds East, along the 40 acre lire, 5G.0 feet for a PAINT OF BEGIIv'~TING; thence North 1 degrees J1 minutes 28 seconds E., along the 40 acre lire, 156.0 feet, thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds West, 250.0 feet thence South 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds Weet 150.0 feet to the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds East, along the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard 150.0 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, Pinellas County, Florida. TAX PARCEL N0. 18/29/16/00000/130/1000 PARCEL B The East 150 feet of the North Z30 feet of the East 256.7 fee of the South 330 feet or the Southwest Quarter(SN 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter(NE 1/4) o° Section 18, Township 29 South Range 16 East, being Clore particularily described as follows: From the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Ra:age 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 1334.57 feet along the East-West centerline of said Section 18 to the 40 acre line; thence along said ~0 acre line run N., 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds E., 330.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; said P.O.B. being the Southwest corner of the intersection of S~:elley Street and Old Coachman Road(C.R. No. 32); thence frog said POINT OF BEGINNING, run N., 89 degrees 41 minutes 1.8 eecor_ds W., 150.0 feet, along the South line of said Shelley Street; thence rur. South ]. degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds W., 130.0 feet; thence run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 150.0 feet to said 40 acre line; thence with said 40 acre ].ins, run N., 1 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds E., 130.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TAX PARCEL NO. 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ., PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' ~ 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE 727,662-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 pECLARATION OF TJNITY OF TITLE Property Owner: Joseph P. Murphy ' Property Address: 2498 Gulf-to-Bay_Boulevard, Clearwater TAX# 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 and fax # 18/29/16/00000/130/3000 KNOW OP ALL MEN BY TKESE PRESEIITS, that pursttant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater perraiuiing to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the mider5~igned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida. to wit: Attached. do hereby make the following dxlaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said Lands, hereafter to be lrnown and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OP TTIl,E, as to the following particulars: 1., That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate tots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as ands hereby declared to bt unufied under one title as an indivisible building sine. Z. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land. and that no portion thereof. shall be sold, assigned, transferred, coocrveyed or devised separately except ab. its entirety, as one plot or parcel of lend. 3. Thai this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to rim with the land, as provided by law, and shall. be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all patties claiming under them undl such t:Gme as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersignEd also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in Use public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this , ,(~fh day of /~/~`~f~ , 20Q(o at Clearwater, Florida. OWNER (S): , STATE OF-Pb9i~H/A NeLv Y~d~ 6 r<< COUNTY QF IA,S~ £fKF,~-1b-v~c udk~ The f going instnunent was aeknowtc gcd before me [his ~ ~ day of :` e~c%, '< On of whom the inst[UQ1Crlt as E71'`INdtl~ , ~. O ~_ ~. , ~ c~ = tVOtary PubLc SiglelNre r-n: ~~..+,~ T' _ SHARYN A GARI=Y .~ .~ ~ ~~ ~.°:~ ~l~flrl9'4i~ltod~ No. 4996220 ~~-~ • ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~, •` Notary Commission Number: ~~pp~{{. SE/#1.~i9,S[~.i~ „,~,~~~` \, Pcreonatly Imown ~ oI ~dcedl~iEerentific, on ~ ~`S-1 ~'~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~' , ~ ~ ~ P~120257 R LEGAL DESCRIPTIOtV' EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A PARCEL A: From the Southeast corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Ranges 16 East, run thence North 1 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds East, along the 40 acre lire, 5G.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGIZv'1TING; thence North 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., along the 40 acre line, 156.0 feet, thence Ncrth 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds West, 250.0 feet thence South 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 seconds West 150.0 feet to the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, thence Soutz 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds East, along the Northerly boundary of Gulf to Bay Boulevard 150.0 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, Pinellas County, Florida. TAX PARCEL N0. 18/29/16/00000/130/1000 PARCEL B: The East 150 feet of the North 130 feet of the East 256:7 fee of the South 330 feet o` the South west Quarter (S+~T 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter(NE 1/4) o° Section 16, Township 29 South Range 16 East, being c:~ore particularily described as follows: From tre Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Ra:age 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 1334.57 feet along the East-'nest cer_terline of said Section 18 to the 40 acre line; thence along said ~0 acre line run N., 1 degrees O1 minutes 28 second$ E., 330.0 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; said P.O.B. being the Southwest corner of the intersection of Shelley Street and Old Coac'r_man Road{C.R. No. 32); thence frog: said POINT OF BEGINNING, run N., 89 degrees 41 mzn~utes 18 seconds W., 150.0 feet, along the South line of said Shelley Street; thence rur. South ]. degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds W., 130.0 feet; thence run S., 89 degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds E., 150.0 feet to said 40 acre line, thence with said 40 acre line, run N., 1 degrees Ol minutes 28 seconds E., 130.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TAX PARCEL NO. 18/29/16/00000/130/0910 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~t~ l ~ zoos PLANNING DEPARTN~ENT CITY OF CLEARW~~TER ~ ~ Project Narrative For Drainage Bank Atlantic Clearwater, Florida Site Location The proposed site in which Bank Atlantic will occupy is located at 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, Florida. The site is 0.96 acres. Bank Atlantic will lease the property from the owner (Murphy and Murphy). Pre development This site was previously (2) parcels; the owner has recorded a unity of title for the two lots. One parcel consisted of a closed gas station and the other parcel is vacant. The existing impervious area is 18333.74 sgft and the existing pervious area is 23619.48 sgft. The Predevelopment Curve is: USE Area CN Impervious 0.421 Ac 98 42.83 Pervious 0.542 Ac 79 41.65 Post development The site post development condition will require treatment. The treatment will be done using trench drains. The recovery analysis was done using Modret software for Dry Ponds. The Post Development Curve is: ORIGINAL RECEIVED USE Area CN JUL 14 2000 Impervious 0.653 Ac 98 42.84 Pervious 0.309 Ac 79 41.65 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Surface Water Management Design A permit application for a General Permit has been submitted to SWFWMD, and the site is designed in accordance with SWFWMD design requirements and the City of Clearwater standards. This project consists of main building with associated paved parking, drive isles, landscape areas and an underground retention system (Stormtech) to retain 0.5" over the site area. At the present time the site is developed and has an old building with a small parking lot. The site contains fine sand with mild to moderate slopes. The seasonal High Water Table is estimated to be at 7.5 inches below ground surface. Based on sandy soils encountered at the boring and the results of the double ring infiltrometer test (12.26 in/hr), the soil at the site should be considered hydrologic group B. ~n the post condition, the surface water management system is designed to retain .OS" over the site for water quality pre-treatment. Our design was modeled using Modret software taking into account infiltration during the storm event. A safety factor of two was utilized for modeling purposes. Water and Wastewater Facilities The City of Clearwater Utilities will provide water and wastewater services to the site. Operation and Maintenance The owner will operate and maintain the storm water management system as designed by the engineer. Any debris or trash accumulated in the trench system will be collected and properly disposed of. The drainage pipes and the dbi's will be checked at least once a year for accumulation of trash and sediments. If necessary, the drainage system will be properly cleaned. Site Erosion Control Plan All vegetative cover will be placed as soon as possible on all exposed areas. These areas should be stabilized before any extended period of construction shutdown. Refer to plans for sod, seed and mulch areas. Land grading will be allowed only in the areas of immediate construction. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER REVISED F.D.O.T. 8~ SWFWMD Drainage Calculations For: BANK ATLANTIC CLEAR.I~VATERr FLO~~DA Prepared For: BaIVK ATLaNTrC 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD. (SR-60) Clearwater, FL Prepared B t ~. COMNfERO1AL DEVELOPfiAENT ~OLUTtOtVS, Ii~tC. Land Development Design and Permitting Services 1118 South Florida Ave. Latceland, Ft 3383-'t379 Date: fVovember 5, 2006 DRAINAGE CALCULATION SIGNATURE PAGE ' For: Bank Atlantic ' 2498 Gulf To Bay Blvd. (SR-60} Clearwater, FL Prepared By: ' Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. Land Development Design and Permitting Services ' 1118 South Florida Ave. Lakeland, Florida 33803-1379 Tel: 863-802-1500 Fax 863-802-1505 t Note: The "Geotechnical Investigation" ncornorate~ within these Drainage Calculations is not cerNiied by endorsing engineer. William Y. Harrell, P.E. # 7729 .,~,,~. A•P '~~ L ~` ~ •^ ,~ ~ Z ';DE~~ ~~2006 ~ ~' a~Aiea' ~ ,. ' Table of Contents ' Project I~tarrative ................................................................................................... Supporting Drainage Calculation Information .................................................... TR-55 Runoff Curve Numbers ............................................................................... Modret Calculations ........................................................................ F.D.O.T Drainage Calculations .............................. ...................................... .... .... Pre-Development Basin "PRE" ................................................................................ Overland- Rurroff Chart ........................................................................................... ' Zone 6 Rainfall Intensity -Duration -Frequency Curve Chart ::::::::::::::::::::::::: Post Development Stage Summary.. Basin Summary Ffiydrographs 3YR/"CHR thru't00YR/2~t~fir ........................ ICPR Input Report Data ........................................................... . ... Node .Maximum Comparisons ........................................................ Link Connectivity ............................................................................. ' Link Maximum Comparisons ........................................................... SWFWMD Drainage Calculations ........................................................................ ' SWFWMD Rainfall Map .......................................................................................... Pre Development Curve Number Calculations ........................................................ Post Development Curve Number Calculations ........................................... ,. Water Quality Volume Calculations .................................................... Post Basin. Summary. 25YR/24HR_..._.............---__._....._ ....... ..................... _ ICPR Input Report Data .................................................................. ' Node Maximum Conditions ............................................................... - Lind Connectivi#y ............................................................................. Link Maximum Conditions ......................................... ~' Legat Descr'rpt'ron t Deed .. ................................................................................ Exhibits ...................................................................:.............................................. Location Map ............................................. ............................................... FEI~RA Ntap ................................................................................................. . ~ ' ... USDA NRCS Soils Data ............................................................ ............. - Site Photographs, Existing Conditions ............................................ Geotechnical Investigation ................................................................................... Project Narrative ' Project Narrative For Baf~lK aTLaNTIC This project consists of the construction of a 4,100s.f. Bank Building, Drive thru lanes, asphalt driving surface, and a surface water management system as required complying with F.D.O.T., SWFWMD, and-City of Clearwater, and Pinellas Coun- ty rules. Site Location This project is located in Section 18; Township 29 South, Range 16 East, on the North side of Gulf --~ to-Bay Blvd, and west of Old Coachman- Road in Cleanrvatec,' Pinellas- County, Florida-. Pre Development This site is currently abandoned. The existing impervious area is 0.42 acres and the existing pervious area- is- 0..54- acres, The site. has no- existing- r-etention- pond: All storm- water runoff drains- directly into an existing FDOT storm inlet. The runoff is taken off site, via 18" RCP pipe into an existing system. This existing outfatl inlet is to remain, and we have incorporated it into our design. Total Contiguous Land The project area consists of 0.96 acres with 0.63 acres of impervious area. The total contiguous land- owned- by the applicant is 0:96 acres. ' Soils MDM Services, Inc. performed soil borings and a double ring infiltrometer test within the proposed pond- area:. The soil type is- urban land-, which is confrmed- by the USDA- NCR Soils- Data. The SHWT elevation at the location where the underground chambers will be constructed, has been established by MDM Services, Inc. to be greater than 7.5' below the land surface. Please refer to the Geotechnical Investigation Report located at the end of this package. Design Criteria This permit application is for a SWFWMD Standard General (minor systems) and an F.D.O.T. Drainage. Connection- Permit. The. entire site is in an-open basin-. We are required ta- tr-eat only the water quality volume onsite. There are two underground storage chambers; both chambers have a discharge point, which drain into an existing storm inlet located onsite. The Chambers are designed as dry percolation chambers with outfalls due to the low SHWT and high permeability rate. They are designed to address the following permitting and engineering issues: ' Treat the water quality volume: '/" of runoff from the entire basin area (below the weir crest elevation), and run that same volume thru the:chambers using Modret 6.1 to demonstrate-the recovery time to be. no more- that 72 kiours, Please refer to-the Modr-et Calculations in the Drainage Calculation package. ' Utilities The City of Altamonte Springs and Seminole County are currently servicing this area will continue to do sa, for water and wasteuvater facilities. Operation and Maintenance .- The owner will operate and maintain the stormwater management system as designed by the engineer. The- owner wiA have the grassed areas mowed once- a week. or as necessary. Any debris- ortrash accumulated in the pond will be collected and property disposed of. Drainage pipes, swales will be routinely checked for accumulation of trash and sediments. If necessary, the drainage system will be properly cleaned. The chambers will be checked routinely for debris. Erosion Control Measures All vegetative cover will be placed as soon as possible on all exposed areas. These. areas should "" be. stabilized before. any extended- period- of constraction. shut-down. Refer. to- theaac plans for ' sodded, seed, and mulched areas. The chambers and swales will be constructed as early in the project as possible to hold back sediment on-site. Land grading will be allowed only on those areas going onto immediate construction. Hay bales and/or silt fences will be provided along the north, south, east and west boundaries. of the project area to mitigate any adverse water quality impact that may occur during: construction. The stormtech~ chambers"will be constructed- as the initial phase of the project. AA"site ranoff shall be directed to these chambers as soon as there is construction. Supporting Drainage Calculation Information r~ 1 0 TR-55 Runoff Curve Numbers i i r Table 2-lc.-Kunoff curve numbers for other agricultural (ands' . " Curve numbers for Cover description hydrologic soil group- Hydrologic Cover type condition A B C D Paaw•e, fH•assland, or range-continuous Poor 68 79 86 89 forage fo;~ gt azing.2 .Fair 49 69 79 84 Good 39 61 74 80' Meado~e-continuous grass, protected from - 30 ~e' 58 ?1 78 gt•azing and generally mowed for hay. 'Brush-brush-H•eed-grass mixture with brush Poor 48 67 7? 83 . the major element.3 Fair 35 56 ?0 7? Good °30 = 48 65 73 Woods-grass combination (oi•chai•d Poor 5? 73 82 86 or tree fat•m).s Fair 43 65 76 82. Good 32 58 72 79 Woods e Poor 45 66 77 83 -- • Fair 36 60 73 79 Good ~ °30 ~ b5 70 77 Farmsteads-buildings, lanes, driveways, - 59 74 82 86 • and stirrounding lots. ' 'Average runoff crondition, and I„ = 0.LS. ~!'uur: <5U"/c .grouiul cover os• hea~•ily glazed ti•ith Rio mulch. 1''air iiU to 7o'k ground curer and not heavily ],Hazed. Guud: 57ii~k ground cover and lightly or only occasionally gazed. ~1'oiu:• <5U7 ground cover. F«ir.• uU to 75~k ground cover. (;vod: > 70'7 ground cover. . 'Actual cm~•e number is less tho-m 3U; use CN = 30 fur runoff rpmputat ions. "Cl3's shu~rn were computed fen• xreus ~~•ith :i(Yi4 ~i•cuch and :il)~k },H as.~ (pa.~tw•e) curer. Uther combinations, of condi tions mug be computed from the CNb fur ~euo<l~ and pasture. s!'uur: Purest liter, small trees, and hrv:h are desU•u~•rel by heae}• ],Hazing w• regular burning: fair: Woud~.are }pawl bul nut bur•ried, and some forest litter cuecr~ the roil. (;curl: Wuuds tu•e prvterted from grazing. and litter and b,vsh acleyuxtely cover the soil. '. (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 2-7 t r Modret Calculations MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PRO]ECT NAME : traRk attarrt'rc~ ct~airwater f OOg POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between- Bottom 8t DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/E~Itration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of'Barrier Bottom 1,886.00 ft2 7,492.00 ft3 1.00 46.00 ft 48.50 ft 51.50 ft 51.50 ft 55.50 ft 0.30 24.52 ft/d 2.00 24.52 ft/d 0.30 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Analysis Date: 11/5/2006 MODRET ' TIME -RUNOFF INPUT BATA f PRE}}EC'F I~FkINE: BkNIE kTLl4NTIC CLE-kRViFkTER 6flOg 1 STRESS PERIOD NtJ1~iBER INCREMENT OF TIME ~h~1 VOLUME OF RUNOFF (f~3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 1,743.00 2 8.88 0.00 3 8.88 0.00 4 8.88 0.00 5 8.88 0.00 6 8.88 0.00 7 8.88 0.00 8 8.88 0.00 9 8.88 0.00 Analysis Date: 11/5/2006 ~; MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PRf~]ECT NANtE : band atlatt~i~ c~eat~wa~er 6009- CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER .ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00: 48.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 48.500 0.11256 0.10648 1.QQ 52.226- O..iQQ41 0_Q0. 0.04647 9.13 51.500 0.03533 0.00 0.02419 18.75 51.021 0.01997 0.00 001576 27.63 50.752 0.01366 0.00 0.01155 36.50 50.555 0.01033 0.00 0.00911 45.38 50.399 0.00830 0.00 0.00749 54.25 50.271 0.00691 0.00 0.00633 63.13 50.164 0.00589 0.00 0.00546 72.00 50.070 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 52.226 feet @ 1.00 hours Recovery @ 9.127 hours * Tme- increment when there is ncr ranvff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 4.912 ft/day Analysis Date: il/5/Z006 0 MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PR0,7fCT NAMtE : frank attalntic~ ctaarwat+a~ 6008 POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond- Volurne between- Bottom- 8t DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/E~Itration Trench `+lydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom ~4TFtL. VO L.l.(1'1'1 ~ 1,886.00 ft2 7,482.00 ft3 1.00 46.00 ft 48.50 ft 51.50 ft 51.50 ft 55.50 ft 0.30 24.52 ft/d 2.00 24.52 ft/d 0.30 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Analysis Date: 11/5/2006 MODRET TIME -RUNOFF INPUT DATA ~ PRE}}ECT NFkME: BkNIE kTLkIVTIC CLEkRVIFkTER 6flOg 1 STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (tars) VOLUME OF RUNOFF ~ft3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 7,492.00 2 4.38 0.00 3 4.38 0.00 4 4.38 0.00 5 4.38 0.00 6 4.38 0.00 7 4.38 0.00 8 4.38 0.00 9 4.38 0.00 Analysis Date: 11/5/2006 MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PRE}]ff,"F NANFE : bainic atFaintie elearWa~er ib009 1 CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATNE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 48.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 48.500 0.24193 p.22397 1.00. 55...070 0.20641 0..00 0.12746 5.38 53.998 0.10064 0.00 0.07383 9.75 53.377 0.06190 0.00 0 Q4998 14,13 52.957 0.04382 0.00 0.03765 18.50 52.640 0.03390 0.00 0.03015 22.88 52.386 0.02763 0.00 0.02510 27.25 52.175 0.02327 0.00 0.02144 31.63 51.995 0.02006 0.00 0.01868 36.00 51.838 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 55.070 feet @ 1.00 hours Recovery @ > 36.000 hours * Tme~ increment when- there- is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 10.332 ft/day Analysis Date: 1 FDOT Drainage Calculations Pre-Development Basin "Pre" i D i BANK ATLANTIC PROJECT N0.6009 PRE - DEVEEOPMEN'F BASIN "PRE" C _ (063) (0.95) + (0.33) (0.20) = 0.69 0.96 SLOPE = 2% LAtaD USE = PERVIOUS, PAVEMENT, 6RASS- SOILS TYPE = URBAN LAND I = 5.2 IN/HR (3YR) & 8.5 IN/HR (100 YR) ZONE 6 TC = 200 FT @ 75 FT/MIN = 2.66 MIN. (USE 15 MIN) PRE- DEVELOPMENT BASIN SUMMARY BAS11V # "PRE" RUNOFF C 0.69 (3 YR) 5.2 F (100 YR) 8.5 AREA 0.96 Q (3 YR) 3.44 4 (1-00 YR) 5.63 0 Overland Runoff Chart VOLUME 2-PROCEDURES Florida Department of Transportation Drainage Manual 625-840-205-a Page 90 of 98 ~OOI 90 80 °; 70 v U O > ~ D Z 5 W O ~ W Q w Q 40 -, Sto~~ OVERLAND RUNO 200 ~ 2 3 q 5 6 AVERAGE SLOPE OF TERRAIN (Percent) FIGURE 5-19 Overland Flow Velocities for Various Land Use Types 1 r Zone 6 Rainfall Intensity -Duration - Frequency Cutve Chart ,.. _..__ ,.u..., .. _, .. .,i!-'EL. .:.,:!_--'fit ^, .:.~~..L^-n, ,.=.'r--n.::.. .., r--;p.... r-~-n.... -_'_~._-m --'-n. rssa.:., tam.,., .M..,. <u....:.. _._ .... ..._. Post Development Stage Summery POST DEVELOPMENT STAGE SUMMARY for BANK ATLANTIC 1 Please refer to: (1) ICPR Basin Summary for Hydrograph information; (2) Input Data for SWM Pond, Discharge Structure, & Model Simulation Data; and (3) Peak Condition Output for Tabled Data. FREQUENCY / PEAK STAGE DURATION EL.SWM POND TOTAL DISCHARGE CFS. 3YR/1 HR 53.41 0.06 3YR/2HR 53.61 0.80 3YR/4HR 53.63 1.05 3YR/8HR 53.67 1.32 3YR/24HR 53.58 0.52 100YR/1 HR 54.03 2.76 100YR/2HR 54.12 3.12 40UYR/4HR 54.02 2.73 100YR/8HR 54.14 3.19 100YR124HR 53.65 1.17 3 Yr. Storm Critical Duration = 8 Hr.; Post-Development Discharge of 1.32 cfs is less than Pre-Development Discharge of 3.44 cfs. 100 Yr. Storm Critical Duration = 2 Hr.; Post-Development Discharge of 3.12 cfs is less than Pre-Development Discharge of 5.63 cfs. r Basin Summary Hydrographs 3h'R/1 HR thru100Y~t/24Hr '~ ,~ .... Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** Basin Siannary - 25YR24HR ******************************************** ------------------------ *** -------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND ' Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount (in): 9.00 Storm Duration (hr): 24.00 °'• Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (~): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 12.10 -• Flow Max (cfs): 3.93 Runoff Volume (in): 7.06 Runoff Volume (cf): 24591 fl ' Advanced Interconnected Channel ~ Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies. Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** Basin Summary - 3YR1HR ****************,~************'t**,t***~~t*~t~** ----------------------- *** --------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND - Hydrograph Type.: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 2.50 Storm 0uration (hr): 1.00 Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): -0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of-Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (~>: 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 0.77 Flow Max (cfs): 1.61 Runoff Volume (in): 1.12 Runoff Volume (cf): 3888 ' Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********~* Basin Summary - 3YR2HR ***~**~*~*****~*************,t***********~* Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 _~ Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.22 Storm Duration (hr): 2.00 Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit F(yd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 OCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs>: Flow Max (cfs): 0.90 1.59 Runoff Volume (in): 1.70 Runoff Volume (cf): 5919 D 1 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ** Besin Summary - 3YR4HR **** ***** ******* ********************~****** Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND f{ydrograph Type: UH Um t Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 ' Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 ; Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.80 Storm Duration (hr): Status: 4.00 ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): Flow Max (cfs): 2.53 1..20 Runoff Volume (in): 2.20 Runoff Volume (cf): 7649 i Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] ' Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies. Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 Basin Summary 3YR8HR ... B sin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND ' Hydrograph Type: UH ' Unit I{ydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Ine (min): 2.00 ' Carp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.80 Storm Duration (hr): 8.00 Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 ' Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 4.03 Flow Max (cfs): 1.47 Runoff Volume (in): 3.09 Runoff Volume (cf): 10757 i Advanced Interconnected Channel 8 Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 **,~~r***** Basin Surnnary - 3YR24HR ********~************~***~r*,t,t*******,t**~,~**~t* Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND ' Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 6.50 Storm Duration (hr): 24.00. Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit I{yd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 - Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.52 Runoff Volume (in): 4.66 Runoff Volume (cf): 16256 r Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995. Streamli ne Technologies. Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 Basin Summary 100YR1HR ._ .. ~** Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE -- Node Name: POND Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 .,, Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 ' Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.50 --- Storm Duration (hr): 1.00 Status: ONSITE ' Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 0.73 Flow Max (cfs): 3.96 Runoff Volume (in): 2.82 Runoff Volume (cf): 9812 fl fl Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C17 Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** BeSln Summary - 100YR2HR ******-,t**~t**********~x***~t~x*~t***~t***~**~t~t~ ---~ 1 ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 6.00 Storm Duration (hr): 2.00 Status; ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.9b ~ Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 ~ Curve Number: B4.00 OCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 0.90 Flow Max (cfs): 3.96 ' Runoff Volume (in): 4.20 Runoff Volume (cf): 14619 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1) Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies. Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 *~***~*** BaSln Summary - 100YRq}1R **~~***~******~~***~*********************** ----------------------- *~ --------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND f(ydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.30 Storm Duration (hr): 4.00 Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres>: 0.96 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 2.50 Flow Max (cfs): 2.75 Runoff Volume (in): 5.42 Runoff Volume (cfl: 18900 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) Cl] Copyright 1995; Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atelntic - Clearwater - 6009 ' **,r~rrt*~r~ Basin Summary _ ********,~*******~*,~******~**~**~***~*****~* 100YR8HR ,._.. B sin Name: POST Group .Name: BASE Node Name: POND Hydrograph Type: UH Umt !{ydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 9.20 Storm Duration (hr): Status: 8.00 ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit I{yd (in>: 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (~): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): Flow Max (cfs): 4.03 3.28 Runoff Volume (in): 7.25 Runoff Volume (cf): 25265 1 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 1 C 1 *~*****'~** Basin Summary - 100YR24R *****************************~*****,t***,r**** Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FDOT-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.00 Storm Duration (hr): 24.00 Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol. of Unit F{yd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs>: 1.17 Runoff Volume (in): 10,96. Runoff Volume (cf): 38195 ICPR Input Report Data Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 '' . _. ********** Input Report ***~********************~*********~*~*~~*~********~*~** --------Class: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: GRNDWTR Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 61.5 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0 -- Comment: ' Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0 0.008 30 0.029 .. --------Class: Node----------------------- Name: OUTFACE Base Flow(cfs): 0 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------------ 52.02 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0 Comment: Time(hrs) Stage(ft) ' 0 52.02 30 52.02 ----•---Class: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: POND Base Flow(cfs): 0 Group: BASE Init Warn Stage(ft): Stage(ft): 51.5 55.5 Comment: Stage(ft) Area(ac> 51.5 0.043 '; 55.5 0.043 --------Class: Operating Table------------ -------------------------------------- Name: PERC Type: Rating Curve Comment: REFER TO MODRET 6.1 TOTAL VOLUME U/S Stage(ft) Discharge(cfs) CALCULATION 48.5 0.24193 51.995 0.02006 52.175 0.02327 ~; 52.386 0.02763 52.64 0.0339 52.957 0.04382 53.377 0.0619 53.998 0.10064 55.07 0.20601 L •~ Advanced Interconnected Channel ~ Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C2] Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 ********** Input Report ******,rir*************************,t********************~ --------Class: Drop Structure--------------------------------------------------- Name: WEIR From Node: POND Length(ft): 22 .Group: BASE To Node: OUTFACE Count: 1 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use do Upstream Geometry: Circular Downstream Geometry: Circular UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Span(in): 18 18 Rise(in): 18 18 Invert(ft): 53 52.89 Manning's N: 0.013 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 0 Bottom Clip(in): 0 0 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Flow: Positive Exit Loss Coef: 1 Equation: Aver Conveyance ^ Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular CMP: Headwall 2 1 Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular CMP: Headwall 2 1 PROPOSED STRU TO EXIST STORM MH ** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure WEIR *** [TABLE] ~~ Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0 Type: Horiz Top Clip(in): 0 Flow: Positive Weir Discharge Coef: 3.13 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.62 Span(in): 24 Invert(ft): 53.5 Rise(in): 15 Control Elev(ft): 53.5 '`"" --------Class: Rating Curve----------- ------------------------------------------ Name: RC Count: 1 From Node: POND Group: BASE Flow: Positive To Node: GRNDWTR TABLE ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) #1: PERC 0 ~ 0 #2: 0 0 #3: 0 0 #4: 0 0 '' 1 n Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [3] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies. Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 *~~~***~* Input Report *****~x*~t~-x****~x***r*~~******~,t***~*********,t****** --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\PRO,]ECTS\6009\25YR24HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS-------------------- ---------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: No Time Step Optimizer: 10 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS-------------- -------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] --------Class: Simulation---------- --------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR1HR Execution: Both Header: bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 1 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 2.5 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-1 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(m in): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS----------- ------------------------ ----------------- + BASE {11/05/06] --- Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [4] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 :' ~,~~~,~* Input Report *****~*~*******~***,-~***~*******~~~*****~*********~~*** --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- ---. C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR2HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 -__. _ ------ --HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z Cft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 2 - Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 3.22 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-2 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 :_.. ---------GROUP SELECTIONS---------------------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\PRQJECTS\6009\3YR4HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta. Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 4 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 3.8 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-4 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time(sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS---------------------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [5] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 ' ~***~t**** Input Report ~*~~********~**,~**~*****~**~~**~**~~*~*********~ --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR8HR ' Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 _"_' HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 8 _ Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rain Amount(in): Rainfall File: 4.8 FDOT-8 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 To Hour: PInc(min): 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS-------------- --------------------- ----------------- • + BASE [11/05/06]. --------Class: Simulation------------------------------- ------------------------ C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR24HR Execution: Both ii" Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS----------------- ------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): Delta Z Factor: 1 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 24 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 6.5 Sim.Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-24 Sim End Time(hrs): Min Calc Time(sec): 30 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(m in): To Hour: PInc(min): i0 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS ----------- ----------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] -., Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [6] ' Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 ' ~**~***~ Input Report ~*~~~**,-~*~********~r*,~~t***~~x*,i-k~**~**********~x*~+ --------Class: Simulation---------------------------------------------------=--- __ C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR1HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 '--. HYDRAULICS------------ - --------HYDROLOGY-------------------- ------- - Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): I Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 4.5 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Sim End TimeChrs): 30 Rainfall File: FDOT-1 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time(sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 To Hour: PInc(min): 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS--------------- ------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] --------Class: Simulation----------- -------------------- ------------------------ C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR2HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS--------------------- --------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Our(hrs): 2 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in>: 6 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-2 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: Pinc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS--------------- -------------------- ----------------- + BASE [il/05!06] - Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing. (ICPR Ver 2.21) C7] ' Copyright 1995,. Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 ~****~~* Input Report ***~x,x****,~~******~~*~x******,~~r~*~rt*~*,~,t~***~~~~**~~x~ --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR4HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 HYDRAULICS------------------- ----------HYDROLOGY-------------------- ' Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 4 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 7.3 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-4 ' Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 b0 30 5 20 5 30 60 - - ---------GROUP SELECTIONS------------- ---------------------- ----------------- + BASE [11/0&/06] --------Class: Simulation--------- ---------------------- ------------------------ C:\.ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR8HR Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS------------------- ----------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 8 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 9.2 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-8 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 20 5. 30 5 ' 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS------------- --------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] -. Advanced Interconnected Channel. & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [8] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 ,' ~***~~*,~ Input Report **~*****~*~*******~**~~*~x~**+*~********************** --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR24R :, Execution: Both Header: Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 1 Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: Yes Time Step Optimizer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 24 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Rain Amount(in): 13 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-24 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time(sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(m in): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 30 5 20 5 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS --------------- -------------------- ----------------- + BASE [11/05/06] 1 fl Node Maximum Comparisons Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** Node Maximum Comparisons **********************************************************~************** (Time units - hours) _ ~~ Sim Max Time Max Stage Warning Max Oelta Max Surface Max Time Max Inflow Max Time Max Outflow ' ~ Name Conditions (ft) Stage (ft) -- Stage (ft) ------------ Area (sf> -------------- Inflow ---------- (cfs> ------------- Outflow ----- (cfs) -- ------------- *** Node Name: POND ----------- Group: ---------- BASE 25YR24HR 12.21 54.22 55.50 0.0496 1873.08 12.08 3.91 12.21 3.53 3YR1HR 1.91 53.41 55.50 0.0494 1873.08 0.76 1.60 1.91 0.06 ' 3YR2HR 1.63 53.61 55.50 0.0495 1873.08 0.92 1.58 1.63 0.80 3YR4HR 2.78 53.63 55.50 0.0363 1873.08 2.50 1.19 2.78 1.05 3YR8HR 4.17 53.b7 55.50 0.0442 1873.08 4.00 1.46 4.17 1.32 3YR24HR 12.03 53.58 55.50 0.0125 1873.08 12.00 0.52 12.03 0.52 100YR1HR 0.97 54.03 55.50 0.0499 1873.08 0.75 3.94 0.97 2.76 100YR2HR 1.13 54.12 55.50 0.0500 1873.08 0.91 3.92 1.13 3.12 100YR4HR 2.54 54.02 55.50 0.0490 1873.08 2.49 2.75 2.54 2.73 - 100YR8HR 4.08 54.14 55.50 0.0481 1873.08 4.00 3.28 4.08 3.19 100YR24R 12.03 53.b5 55.50 0.0107 1873.08 12.00 1.17 12.03 1.17 Link Cohhectivity 1 t Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 '~ ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\25YR24HR ************** ', Index Link from To U/S D/S Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry ------ --------- 1 -------- - ------------ WEIR ------- --------- POND. -------- --------- OUTFALL -------------------- --------- --------- ----------------------- ----------------- Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFALL Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) n Advanced Interconnected Channel ~ Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] -- Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR1HR **************** Index Link From To UJS D/S Number ------ Name -------- - Node ------- Node -------- Link Type Geometry Geometry -------------------- --------- --------- --------- 1 ------------ WEIR --------- POND --------- OUTFACE ----------------------------------------- Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) 0 Advanced Interconnected Channel 8 Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ;, Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR2HR **************** Index Link From To U/S D/S Number ------ Name -------- - Node ------- Node -------- Link Type Geometry Geometry -------------------- --------- --------- --------- 1 ------------ WEIR --------- POND --------- OUTFACE ----------------------------------------- Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) r n 1 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atalntic - C1earMrater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR4HR **************** Index Link From To U/S D/S Number ------ Name -------- - Node ------- Node -------- Link Type Geometry Geometry -------------------- --------- --------- 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) r ii Advanced Interconnected Channel ~ Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR8HR **************** Index Link From To U/S D/S .. Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry ----- ---- --- - - - - - ------------------ 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) r Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) ClJ ,.._ Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR24HR *************** Index Link from To U/S D/S .._ Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry ------ -------- - ------- -------- -------------------- --------- --------- 1 HEIR POND OUTFACE Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. ;~ 3 RC POND GRNDYJTR Rating Curve(s) r Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] - Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR1HR ************** Index Link From To U/S D/S ~_. Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE I~rizontal WGO Rect. an 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\b009\100YR2HR ************** Index Link From To U/S D/S ~••- Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNOWTR Rating Curve(s) l Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\b009\100YR~HR ************** Index Link From To U/S D/S Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE Dro Structure Circ. :Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. ' 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) n Advanced Interconnected Channel b Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] -•. Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR8HR ************** Index Link. From To U/S D/S Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry - ------------------------- 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE Drop Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atalntic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\100YR24R ************** Index Link From To U/S D/S Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry 1 WEIR POND OUTFACE brop Structure : Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO :.Rect. ' 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) 0 fl u r Link Maximum Comparisons Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [13 Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ' Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** Link Maximum Comparisons ************************************************************ (Time units - hours) Sim Max Time Max Flow Max Delta Q Max Time Max US Stage Max Time Max DS Stage Name Flow (cfs) (cfs) U/S Stage (ft> D/S Stage (ft) *** Link Name: RC Grou BASE 25YR24HR 12.21 0.12 0.05 12.21 54.22 30.00 0.03 3YR1HR 1.91 0.06 0.05 1.91 53.41 30.01 0.03 3YR2HR 1.63 0.08 -0.05 1.63 53.61 30.00 0.03 3YR4HR 2.78 0.08 0.05 2.78 53.63 30.00 0.03 3YR8HR 4.17 0.08 0.05 4.17 53.67 30.00 0.03 3YR24HR 12.03 0.07 0.05 12.03 53.58 30.00 0.03 100YR1HR 0.97 0.10 0.05 0.97 54.03 30.01 0.03 100YR2HR 1.13 0.11 0.05 1.13 54.12 30.00 0.03 100YR4HR 2.54 0.10 0.05 2.54 54.02 29.99 0.03 100YR8HR 4.08 0.11 0.05 4.08 54.14 30.00 0.03 100YR24R 12.03 0.08 0.05 12.03 53,65 30.00 0.03 *** Link Name: WEIR Group: BASE 25YR24HR 12.21 3.41 0.34 12.21 54.22 0.00 52.02 3YR1HR 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 53.41 0.00 52.02 3YR2HR 1.63 0.73 0.14 1.63 53.61 0.00 52.02 3YR4HR 2.78 0.98 0.20 2.78 53.63 0.00 52.02 3YR8HR 4.17 1.24 0.28 4.17 53.67 0.00 52.02 3YR24HR 12.03 0.45 0.05 12.03 53.58 0.00 52.02 100YR1HR 0.97 2.66 0.32 0.97 54.03 0.00 52.02 100YR2HR 1.13 3.01 0.39 1.13 54.12 0.00 52.02 100YR4HR 2.54 2.63 0.35 2.54 54.02 0.00 52.02 100YR8HR 4.08 3.07 0.33 4.08 54.14 0.00 52.02 100YR24R 12.03 1.09 0.04 12.03 53.65 0.00 52.02 G C SWFWMD Drainage Calculations SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ._, , ,, -- . .• -. -r'------ _~ ~ --- ; -----, -_ 7.0 - T13S '`, T,14S f" fi~rss ' s 8.0 Tt s ~y ~(~ gp[~ T17S TWIIVTY FIVE YEAR T18S RETURN PERIOD T19S ~~~ 1~AP T20S T21S T22S T23S T24S T25S T26S A T27S i T28S GRAPHIC SCALE 6 0. 6 12 1B 24 JO 36 T29S T30S ~~~~ T31S T32S 1 r 8.0~ RAINFALL CONTOUR IN INCHE BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTHWEST FL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT "'------ COUNTY BOUNDARY TOWNSHIP/RANGE BOUNDARY ~ ,. •; ~--- ~ ,_~ : ~ ' -- • ~ --1- , -- .__ ._: ~. ,. --. . , ~ ~- , ., , ., =. ., ,, , ~ I , _9, I 'r" -. _ . ~ '----- __.. _ _._ 1 ~ _ ~___ _ '- -, ___.......i.~..._. I _ i ~ _-~ _. ,_ ;~ i ~ ; ' ' -- - - --- ---- ---- -T- ` _ 1 . : _ <~ _ ~-,_. , _ 3 i ~~_ I I I , •----- ~ '._ `~, - , ~ W W W W W W W'% d lA tD .I~i 00 O~ O ~ S 8.0. _~: ORIDA 8.0 ~JANK. QT~.~1~cc~ ~ ~~~9 G GE~rz.W~~~Z ~ i W N i M d I IA (WO ~. n 00 ~ _ ___ 8.0 7.0 • ~ `l 0 Pre Development Curve Number Calculations BANK ATLANTIC CfJRVE NUMBER CALCULATION PROJECT NO. 6009 A. BASIN DESIGNATION PRE-DEVELOPMENT B. TOTAL DRAINAGE BASIN AREA 0.96 AC. C. CURVE NUMBEF~: COVER ACREAGE CN PRODUCT PERVIOUS (GREEN AREA) 0.54 58 31.32 BLDG./ROADWAY 0.42 98 41.16 POND 0 1.00 0.00 SUM 0.96 72.48 WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBE 72.48 = 75.50 0.96 USE CN. = 76 Post Development Curve Number Calculations 1 BANK ATLANTIC CURVE- NUMBER CACCULATfON PROJECT N0.6009 A. BASIN DESIGNATION POST-DEVELOPMENT POST B. TOTAL DRAINAGE BASIN AREA = 0.96 AC. C: CURVE NUMBER: COVER ACREAGE CN PRODUCT PERVfOUS (GREEN AREA) 0.33 58 19.14 BLDGS 0.09 98 8.82 ROADWAY/PARKING/TRASH ENGL 0.54 98 52.92 POND (UNDERGORUND STORAGE 0 100 0.00 SUM 0.96 80.88 1NEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER : 80.88 = 84.25 0.96 USE CN = 84 1 Water Quality Calculations C BANK ATLANTIC WATER QUALITY VOLUME CALCULATION PROJECT NO. 6009 WATER QUALITY CALCULATION: BASIN 1 AREA x 1/2'7'fZ =WATER QUALITYVOCUNIE TREATMENT AREA (Ac.) 0.96 Ac. REQ'D-TREATMENT VOL 0.04 Ac:ft. OR 1743 cf POND DATA: POND 1 P01VD TOP ELEV: 55.50 ; ARfA= 0.043 Ac. MAX. TREATMENT VOLUME ELEV: 53.50 ;AREA= 0.043 Ac. POND- BOTTOM ELEV: 51.50 ;AREA= 0.043 A~. AVERAGE WETTED LENGTH 8~ WIDTH: LENGTH: 170 ft: WIDTH: 11 ft. PROVIDED VOLUME: MAX. TREATMENT VOL. AREA. + POit1D~ BOTTOM AREA / 2~ X WEIGHT- =VOLUME 0.043 + 0.043 X 2 = 0.086 Ac.ft. 2 IS > REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: 0.040 Ac.ft. Post Basin Summary 1 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) Ci] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** Basin Summary - 25YR24HR **************,tit**************************** ~~ Basin Name: POST Group Name: BASE Node Name: POND Hydrograph Type: UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount (in): 9.00 Storm Duration (hr>: 24.00 Status: ONSITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 Area (acres): 0.96 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 Curve Number: 84.00 DCIA (~): Time Max (hrs): 0.00 12.10 Flow Max (cfs): 3.93 Runoff Volume (in): 7.06 Runoff Uolume (cf): 24591 F 1 ICPR Input Report Data ' Advanced Interconnected Channel ~ Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [2] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 .., ******~** Input Report **~**~*********~************~*****~***~~******* --------Class: Basin ---------- -------------------------------------------------- ' Basin: POST Node: POND Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peak Factor: 256 Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): FLMOD 9 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Area(ac): 0.96 Concentration Time min): 15 Curve #: 84 Time Shift(hrs): 0 DCIA(~): 0 --------Class: Drop Structure--------------------------------------------------- Name: WEIR Group: BASE From To Node: POND Length(ft): 22 Node: OUTFALL Count: 1 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use do Upstream Geometry: Circular Downstream Geometry: Circular UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Span(in): 18 18 Rise(in): 18 18 Invert(ft): 53 52.89 Manning's N: 0.013 0..013 Top Clip(iN: 0 0 Bottom Clip(in): 0 0 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Flow: Positive Exit Loss Coef: 1 Equation: Aver Conveyance Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular CMP: Headwall 2 1 Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular CMP: Headwall 2 1 PROPOSED STRU TO EXIST STORM MH *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure WEIR *** [TABLE] Count: i Bottom Clip(in): 0 Type: Horiz Top Clip(in): 0 Flow: Positive Weir Discharge Coef: 3.13 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.62 Span(in): 24 Invert(ft): 53.5 Rise(in): 15 Control Elev(ft): 53.5 n 0 r Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright~1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater- 6009 ~*~~**~* Input Report ,t-k,-~t~t~~************~x,~************~-x*~**************~ --------Class: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: GRNDWTR Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 61.5 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0 Comment: Time(hrs) Stage(ft) 0 0.008 30 0.029 --------Class: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: OUTFACE Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 52.02 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0 Comment: Time(hrs> Stage(ft) 0 52.02 30 52.02 --------Class: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: POND Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 51.5 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 55.5 Comment: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 5I.5 0.043 55.5 0.043 --------Class: Operating Table-------------------------------------------------- Name: PERC Type: Rating Curve Comment: REFER 70 MODRET 6.1 TOTAL VOLUME CALCULATION U/S Stage(ft) Discharge(cfs) 48.5 0.24193 51.995 0.02006 52,175 0.02327 52.386 0.02763 52.64 0.0339 52.957 0.04382 53.377 0.0619 53.998 0.10064 55.07 0.20601 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [3] Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies. Inc. Bank Atlantic -Clearwater- 6009 ..._ ****** --------Cl Input ass: Ra Report *~~***~~**~*~*~***~~**********~********+~*** ting Curve----------------------------------------------------- Name: RC Count: 1 From Node: POND Group: BASE Flow: Positive To Node: GRNDWTR #1: TABLE PERC ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) 0 0 #2: 0 0 #3: 0 0 __ #4: 0 0 r Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic --Clearwater- 6009 . _, ********** Input Report: Simulations ******************************************* ----------------------------------- - C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\25YR24HR - - - Execution: Both Header: Bank Atlantic - Clearwater.- 6009 ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): I Delta Z Factor: 0.05 Override Defaults: No Time Step Optimizer: 10 Drop Structure Optimizer: 10 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time sec): 0.5 Max Calc Time sec): 60 To Hour: PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 b0 30 5 20 5 ' 30 60 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS---------------------------------------------------- + BASE [11/05/06] C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\3YR1HR Execution: Both Header: bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 1 ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROL ------------------- ax Delta Z (ft): 1 to Z Factor: 0.05 Over Defaults: Yes Time Step. timizer: 10 Drop .Structure~Op ~ zer: 10 Storm Dur(hrs): 1 Rain Amount(in): 2.5 Sim Start Time(hr 0 Rainfall File: FDOT-1 Sim End Time(hrs): Min Calc 7ime(se 0.5. Max Calc Ti c): 60 To Hour• PInc(min): To Hour: PInc(min): 10 60 5 2D~ 5 -- ~~'----GROUP SELECTIONS---------------- .~"$ASE [11/05!06] ------------------------------------ r Node Maximum Conditions Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing EICPR Ver 2.21) [1J Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ' ********** Node Maximum Conditions - 25YR24HR ***********************************************************~****************~* (Time units - hours) Node Group Max Time Max Stage Warning Max Delta Max Surface Max Time Max Inflow Max Time Max Outflow Name Name Conditions (ft) Stage (ft) Stage (ft) Area (sf) Inflow (cfs) Outflow (cfs) POND BASE 12.21 54.22 55.50 0.0496 1873.08 12.08 3.91 12.21 3.53 1 1 D Link Connectivity ' Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1] Copyright 1995. Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** LINK CONNECTIVITIY --- C:\ICPR2\PROJECTS\6009\25YR24HR ******~******* Index Link From To U/S D/5 Number Name Node Node Link Type Geometry Geometry 1 __________ 1 ___________ WEIR _________ POND _________ OUTFACE ____p__________________ ____________ Dro Structure Circ. Circ. 2 --> slot POND OUTFACE Horizontal WGO ; Rect. 3 RC POND GRNDWTR Rating Curve(s) C L Link Maximum Conditions ' Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) C17 Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. Bank Atlantic - Clearwater - 6009 ********** Link Maximum Conditions - 25YR24HR ************************************************************ ~ (Time units - hours) Link Group Max Time Max Flow Max Delta Q Max Time Max US Stage Max Time Max DS Stage Name Name flow (cfs> <cfs) U/S Stage (ft) D/S Stage (ft) --- -------- RC --------- BASE ---------- 12.21 ----- ---- 0.12 - 0.05 12.21 54.22 - 30.00 0.03 WEIR BASF 12.21 3.41 0,34 12.21 54.22 0.00 52.02 Legal Description{Deed LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF LOTS 573, 574, 575, 599, 600 AND 601, ALTAMONTE LAND HOTEL AND NAVIGATION CO. PLAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 12, PUBLIC RECORDS lF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE SW CORNER OF LOT 570, ~OF SAID ALTAMONTE LAND HOTEL AND NAVIGATION CO., PLAT, RUN N89°56'44"E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 570, 571, 572, AND 573, OF PLAT 480.00 FEET TO THE POB.; THENCE N00°19'16"W 183.67 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF. WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD N0. 436 THENCE N87°37'44"E 2.15 FEET TO THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 5661.65 FEET; RUN THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 172.93 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 °45'00", THENCE RUN S00°19.'16"E 213.09 FEET TO A POINT 25.00 FEET SOUTH 00°19'16"E OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°19'16"W 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, INCLUDING NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND BOSTON AVENUE FOR UTILITIES AND INGRESS AND EGRESS. CURVE TABLE (D&F) CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD CHORD BEARING DELTA C1 5661.65 172.92 172.89 S88°30'34"W 1°45'00" C2 5661.65 74.11 74.11 S89°45'33"W 0°45'00" Exhibits Location Map i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 _4.3.oa 8t~ .a1MW?VV__N pLl ~13~~8 ~ajn~Vd~Nj g ~_' - ~ I j~r; i , , ~ i 1 y v, I . , ., i~ ,. 1' ~ ..., 4 . f ~ ~ ; ~ r ~i ~ r Y _~ 14 , I"a__a"'~~ l 3 . ~ i~ e ~ I ~ Tt - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~0~ e~ I i ~ ~ I ba`1yte~ Pi '~d ~~ ' ~ a. aew-A~ae..~ ' 1 -;i 'r.~eu r~n. n s .<~ ~ ~~ xnr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ! ~ ~ s ~ ~ ' I I 1 ~. ' ~L.f '`.-~-'i I~ „E'v rYb~s s . ~ ~~ r f~Z -.~~~ ty ~' U .~< iu' t~ :. LocaTio~l wtAG' 0 r FEMA Map ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~- ~- ZONE Af JOINS PANEL 0126 AE JOINS PANEL 0126 ~ ~ Alligattar reek ator li reek Z NE 7 37 Channel ~ g Channej n ~c ~ DREW STREET EXTENSION IMIT pF = DET LED STUDY a ZpN A ~ a ONE A! i ~ z a a o ~ ~ A~ t N! 7 ~ a Q f II plfYl l11RET p~ggbN ¢ MR OF g ~ Pinellas Count ~ DET LED STUDY o y oN A ~ ~ nineorporated Areas ~$ ~ s 125139 ~ FA STW OOD ~ DR o " ~ ; ~ Pinellas Coun nincorpgrated NASH ST RE ET ~ ~ rw erhaao $ ~ 12139 ~ NASH STREET Z z V,MIYMAN STREET a a ? , WHITMgN STREET CHA R STREET ' CHALICE STREET ~~ ~ ~ SHELIEY .STREET ~ 'T ~+ ~ SHELLEY ~ 5TREET GULF TO SAY BLVD wuH ~ muzr - x~en ~ YMmwr since 3 w~ eusr ¢ a~EDeY • ~ smffr ouu ro 'vn ecw ~ ' Finellas u Unincorporated A • ~ This la en oltjclal copy of a porfton of the et»oe referenced flood map. K t reflect chan es F-MIT OndJne TMa ma does n ~ ~mMetf usln Pinellas ^1 ~ u g . p o p or amendmerrte which may have been m8de aubsequeM to the date on the or the latest product IntormaBon about National Flood Irtauranee tltle block F . . Proprem Hoop maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mae.tema.gov 1 0 L u 1 USDA NRCS Soils Data u SOIL SURVEY OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BANK ATLANTIC .~ USDA Na+~i le~oorce5 Consecration Servitt Meters Feet 0 10 20 40 0 35 70 140 210 280 Web Soil Survey 1.1 National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/5/2006 Page I of 3 SOIL SURVEY OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA nnAP ~e~~N~ MAP tNFQRMATION !....._._...._ _.j Soil Map Units c cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service ~~ Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Detailed States ~~ Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17 Roaas Soil Survey Area: Pinellas County, Florida -*-~- Rals ~ Spatial Version of Data: 2 ~- ~ ref Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000 Hydlography Oceans x AVAt'A~A1 Escarpment, bedrock vnvnvnv. Escarpment, nor bedrock '~^n~ Gulley unpwutrq Levee .......... Slope v Blowout ® Borrow Pit ~ Clay Spot ~ Depression, closed Eroded Spot X Gravel Pit . • Gravelty Spot ~• Gulley n Lava Flow ® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates: •~. Marsh or Swamp 12/31/1998 O Miscellaneous Water ~ Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot .. Sandy Spot 3~ Slide or Slip 0 Sinkhole N Sodic Spot spoil area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil -ines were compiled and o Stony spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. O Perennial Water USDA Natural Resources `# Wet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/5/2Q06 ~ Converraaoa Serrlce National Cooperative Soil Survey Pa e 2 of 3 S Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida BANK ATLANTIC Map Unit Legend Summary Pinellas. Gounty, Florida. Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI ~ 1 ~ ~ ~otl, md.Urbat l~n~~ 100 U - S ~ `` ~ ~' ~~ ''' ~ ~~rcEnt~lo~cs ~ ~ ~ ord=. ~.. ~:_ _ a= a ~ ,.wr. :~~... ' ~ ~K. .USDA N~.Re Web. Soil Survey 1.1 11/5/2006 i consenatlon smi« National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 1 Site Photographs, Existing Conditions D E~R~tK AT~AIdTfC 24~ GULF T4 BAY BtW. (SR-60) C.tEPtRiflf/~TEk2, Ft 33265-4324 ,% ---~., 25 SHELLY ROAQ ~~~ 26 27 ~~-,. ~; j _ __ 29 ~ 28 ~. 1 2 4 5 ~. ,__~ ,/ 3 1 ~ I 1 ' ~ 1\ i ' i \\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ; ~` ` GULF TO BAY BLVD. (S.R. 60) ~~ 13 ~ ;.~ __. -- ~ %_--- 12 ` 11 D O [L' Z Q U O U O i BANK ATLANTIC 2498 GULF TO BAY BLVD. (SR-60) CLEARWATER, FL 33765-4324 R ~' R~ N .~' - .. 1 ~ ! t ce. .. ` i t ~ ~ ~ ~-. i ~ i _ ~ ~.- ~ - - ~ . _ z: ~, ~ , ~: ,~ . ~- .; ' , , v t ~ 9,~T f' r " w h ~ k ._, ' : ` ~ j . • ~, i rt~ '~_ s $ ..~`..~- ~~~a~ 1~ .pan= PHOTO 2 PHOTO 1 PHOTO 3 ~t ~ ~~ ~~ , ~. :, s _ ..- •,n a . ,~'' .t < a*. },;. w ~:~r " ~ ~~ ~,~ ~~ ~r'a, ~,~~•: .- .- ~»,! ` ~ ` i _ `cf'R'yp~i. t ": _ PHOTO 4 ~i.., v ~A?• f ~ r A y tti ~t~ _ r 'x ~ j ~ ~ ~.: ~", r~~~= ~~ ~~~~ i y ^y~ ~ a~' r ~~~ '~`- ,~ R ~ ~~ ~ _ ~~~~~ j4 w; ~~ • ~^~''.~,~~~ ~ p ~' ~ f ~w_ ,~ < ., ~fi~Ei ~~ c00L PHOTO 6 PHOTO 7 ~_. __ _ ~ .~ _~ g _. ,r r ~,. h . r~.y, sj ~ 7 1~, , S ~ 4~ PHOTO 8 y ,3~, ~, 9 x ~ .. aa f os y ra ~~ S !x ~ r~. ! nr : ~ ; ,iii i ~ ~ ~+,. i' ,` . -_ .a~ re~ CiAfi ~9 t~~(i` w~..a ~ 'y 1st ~~~~ s ~a ~^q" ' ~~ ' ~~. ~ ~ `, ~ f' y •y ~' L _~`~ ~_: ' '. S.i~'iC Vii= S~ ^ _; PHOTO 9 !F ~ r ~~ tI((E`~f L ~~ x~ ~ 4 ~ .~~ l: ' S ' }. __ } ~ • _.. ~p i~ L~'~~F~*71 ~. ,~ r ~c ~ftd . s' y }~ - ~ ' i T • ._ ~; S `` ~; Fy'/- PHOTO 10 ,~? *' a' • hrK~~ ~.. _ _.._ ~- t,~ ..~ ' r ~ r' "~ _ru e ~ i ~~ ' • ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ 19 Z~OU J ~•~~. L~, ~ ... _. r;;a 4 ~~r ~. i '~ ` ~ 't v~ ~. ~~_ ;.• ~ ' - ~. .. r`. ~ : FM-- ~;~ ~ .r ~ . y .;,;~ .~~;_, yr y~ '~ ~ ~`~~ r ~`; , w , .. ~ r; ~i T~' ~ ~ ~Y 1 ~x4 Vf- ~~~~~ ~_ ~r i i~~.. iY .4._ . .' ~~~y, '~~. a ~ ~` PHOTO 11 ~` ~ ' ~~, ..~ ~ ~ '1 , \ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ == Y 3 ;n~ ~=!' 4t~ ,lam i. ~~ , ~~ir + ; ~~: / .. ,t!$t~y~i , ~. -"fir , f .~a : ~. ; - _. _ ~ . Tt~,, f a ~ _ PHOTO 12 ~^~ e.~:., 1!~1~ ~~ ~U~~ _~ ., ,~ ,, ~`~ ~jj `ye. Wit: _ r:,. ~'~ _ i. ~ ~~.i ~ 3:'~trS~ T ~, r c... PHOTO 13 k ~, .;. t. ~" ~y t ...; ~~ ~~ ~~U~t'k ~IAfi~ 19 ^cOUG PHOTO 14 'T,q,~acy ~: . PHOTO 15 { } {~'~ gg~~ ..},' ~p Lii~~~~a fw ~ M. ~ ~ ~ ,- .. .k . `'~ ~`. ~~• ~~; ~ 1 i _ii~' ~«_ ~ °' 5 s ~ ~+~ .fir aey~~r~~ , z 9 ~ _ • , 4 ~ ~y _ T "_ yam; .... ... S * ~•K r w t ~ , ~' F y~j ~~ ~ Cam. PHOTO 16 ~' a . mayy:,.~~ MY- _ ~A.:~. d ~ p~ ~'~+s e-'t' y :: 5n^t+" ~~ d *M ~ ~ ~~~ J t2 ~; ._. _.'. ~d L +k Fc ' YI" A .'s 'F~~: ~ ~ # ~. ~ -; Z Yf ~ ~.~ . f ~.rr~ ~..~r.,_. iit ~ i iiM.iflFFe.;"" _ PHOTO 17 t }'~ i PHOTO 18 w,_ ~~. r _ ~ ~, g g'4 ~. ,5 ! A s , ' ~` i ~.,. ~ ~ ~~+ ,~ + '~ `,_ w ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~~ ~ i, +,. PHOTO 19 y ` ' ~~!'S .'.LYE ~~ -. ,. ~. i Vic: we r._ .,~ ~ -~ ~ - ": ~.. K t ~ _ i f. ~l . t •iin µ k. n~~, r9 zov~ ~~: ~ 3. ~(F ~~ a ~,. n~~ t~ 20~~ PHOTO 20 k`~ PHOTO 21 f n~ ~~~ ~-. ~ F E F.4i f'~- ~ ~~ t~lti3 U PHOTO 22 P ; I .. ; -~'.dk.- ~ -_ PHOTO 23 ~. ~Z.Z.,? _W ~ i~lN%iw J u ~. .a~.~ f ~.!•+fe~ .. ., PHOTO 24 r. ~e, f ` ~ ~ ~.- - - x t ,~ ~.,.: ~` ~~~ PHOTO 25 t~~;~ ~. ; ~";~ _,~, w :~,, ~~ ~ ~: .~,wg ~f' ~~i` ~~ ~~~~~' MR PHOTO 26 PHOTO 27 °, n~F 1r ~(lOL PHOTO 28 ~~~~~ _ ~ ~ «~~~= r.~~ ~9 zany ~~ PHOTO 29 i~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ » f~ PHOTO 30 i t, ~ >:+~3P~ ~ h- t Y 7 ~~ a +~ s ~f Y M ~.. .~~ ; -~~ 7> ~ ? .- Ram ._. ~ - "~ ~ ' '~ .; ~ ~ s { ~ 4 r ~ ~,E.. '~+ El ~,.vi:~~i ~ssw fit. q .: Y .. .. ,ePrr __. .c1-aaP~-.~ ... - ~.~. PHOTO 31 Y. ~. j '~ ;. ._ 4. ''~a ~%~~ r '~ ~ i . u~Y t i ~/iwJi'a1~ _ 9<~:. ^ t 1 / Y ~ / t- I~ l f~.~ ~ l..i j.~d yLb ~JF_`maC' ~ ' ~ , f4 . X' ~~y Y~~ i,~., I '~ ~ ~ .-i,4 _. ~rtX ':/ iws +. _ .. PHOTO 32 r -~ `~ ,~»~.~ ....L __ ~:~¢ ~ ` ' ~ ~"` Geotechnical Investigation MDM Central Florida - 501 WeshPeachtreeStreet- Lakeland, F.L 33815 863646-9130 863/648-1106 FAX 1 MDM South Florida 1'412 SW 34th Ave. Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 ' 954/427-3076 954/427-3420 FAX MDM AUanta 921 Faulkner Lane Ball Ground, GA 30107 770/345-3960 ' 770/345-3961 FAX n MDM Services, Inc. Engineering and Environmental March 24, 2006 Sandra Owens Corr~~rcial Development Solutions, inc. 1234 East, Lime Street, Suite B Lakeland; Florida 33801-SZ85 Geotechnical Investigation Bank AtlantlC 2498 Gulf to i3ay Blvd Clearwater, Florida MDM Project #22015 On March 14, 2006, one double ring infiltrometer (DRT1) was conducted to evaluate the soil drainage characteristics. In addition, three standard penetration tests (SPT-1 through SPT-3) were conducted in general accordance with ASTM Standard D 1586 at the locations depicted on the proposed facility Site Plan (Figure 2, Appendix. A). The site location is depicted on Figure 1 (Appendix A). Hand angering was performed to 5 ft. in depth at each location as a means of protecting potential underground utilities. No utilities or obstructions were encountered. Field logs of each standard penetration test and the double ring infiltrometer results are compiled in Appendix B: All depths as referenced are below the existing grade on the date of testing. On the date of testing, the site was an abandoned gas station. Figure 3 (Appendix A) is an aerial photograph from the Natural Resources Conservation Service; NRCS, depicting soil around the site area. Based on the aerial,: urban land covers the site. Based. on the sandy soils encountered at the borings and results of the double ring infiltrometer (12:26 inlhr), the soils at the site should be considered Hydrologic Group B. From review of the three standard penetration test logs (Appendix'B), .the following is a summary of the site lthology to 14 feet below ground level.;. Surface tti, l4 ft: Sand, pale brown to dark .brown, fine grained, Unified Soil Classification: SP Civil .Engineering ~ Budding Deslgn * Perrrlitting -- Geotechnical'Environmental Assessments. Remediatiora • Corisiruction'Managemeni - Bank•Atlantic- MDM Job #22015 Page 2 Based on the characteristics of the site lithology, adequate support for this proposed :.... ....... _...._ .._._._.... ._ ... Bank _ Atlantic .development will.. be provided._ The following...recommendations .for _... _ .:... __, _ :. _~:. 1 site development are proposed: ' SITE PREPARATION • Surflcial asphalt should be stripped/removed from the proposed building area, and extend a minimum distance of 5 ft. in ail directions from this area. The subgrade below the asphalt layer can remain. ' • The proposed building area, and 5 ft. perimeter beyond this area, should be proof compacted with the use of a minimum 10 ton vibratory roller. The proposed retention pond area should not be compacted. • Compaction tests should be performed at 1 ft. vertical intervals to a minimum depth of 4 ft. below the proposed building foundation "depth. Based on the proposed building size (approx. 4,500 ftr), at :least 2 compaction test locations, ' spaced at least 30 ft. apart, are recommended. For compaction testing, the Modified Proctor test should be performed. A minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density is required to a depth of 4 feet below ` the base of the proposed building foundation. Although not encountered in more than trace amounts during the geotechnical investigation, organic soils, if encountered during site construction, should also be stripped from this area. Such ' stripping should be extended a minilnum of 5 feet beyond the proposed store building area. If adequate compaction is not achieved based on the Modified 1 Proctor test results, the material should be excavated/undercut and placed back in lifts of maxizilum 6 inches for re-compaction. • Imported fill material, if required during site construction, should preferably t consist of fine grained quartz sand with less than 5% organic fines. The fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 6 inches and compacted until a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified. Proctor maximum dry density is achieved to ' a depth of 4 feet below the base of the proposed store building foundation. ' ~ BUILDING FOUNDATION • The building foundation should be installed. at least 1.5 feet below the proposed ' `finish grade of the site. 'The building foundation should be supported either on conventional .shallow spread .footings or a monolithic slab with thickened edges to serve as wall support ' footings. The foundation footings should be sized to exert a maximum pressure of . 2500 psf on the compacted native sand material or structural fill. Provided, the proposed building area of the site, including the recommended 5 ft. perimeter beyond this area, is pioperly compacted as .confirmed by Modified Proctor testing .per the above recommendations, the building foundation will be adequately supported foi this recommended maximum pressure. Footings should be of Ba~REie MDM Job #22015 t Page 3 minimum 16 inch width. As hand augering .was required to S ft. below ground _ . . ... .. _ .._._ _ .... . aevel. at each SPT location in order to cleaz potential underground..utilities, the soil........... ' bearing capacity of this interval could not be determined by standard penetration testing. Based on "N" values (i.e. blow counts per foot of depth} below S ft., the ' bearing capacity of soils at locations is less than 700 psf. • Because the sands on-site were very loose (bearing capacity of 700 psf or less), it is recommended that sands from ground surface to S .feet in depth are excavated from any .proposed building footprint and at least S feet azound the building ' footprint and replaced in lifts not exceeding 6~ inches and compacted until a minimum density,of 9S percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density is ' achieved. Compaction tests should be performed every 2500 ftz per foot of depth in any proposed building areas. Visqueen of minimum 6 mil thickness, or equivalent vapor retazding material, ' should be placed beneath the building floor slab as a means of retarding moisture and subsurface vapors. Stormwater drainage features should be placed as faz as possible from the ' proposed building foundation. The minimum recommended distance for such drainage features from the building foundation is 20 feet. ' PAVEMENT AREAS ' • Paved areas should have a stabilized subgrade of at least 10 inches. • The base course above the subgrade should he a minimum thickness of 6 inches, following compaction. Based on availability in the site area, crushed limerock is the recommended base course (if asphaltic concrete is the fuushed surface course) ' and should be compacted in maximum 6 inch lifts. + The surface course of paved azeas is recommended to be asphaltic concrete and have a minimum stability of 1 S00 pounds. The recommended minimum thickness of the surface course (finished asphalt) is 1.S inches. • Commercial mix concrete of minimum 3000 psi load bearing capacity may be substituted for asphaltic concrete as the sur~a~e course., Vie, n recommended slab thickness is S inches. Welded wire mesh should be set approximately within the slab center during concrete pouring: Compacted sand '. may be substituted for the base course if concrete is chosen as the surface .course. [1 INFILTRATION TESTING One double ring .infiltration test (DRTl) was :performed in accordance with ASTM Standard I333$S at the location depicted in Figure 1 (Appendix A). The -test results <u'~ c~m~led ~ Appendix $: As iatedz. the. approximate vertical inf ltratibn rate -was determined to be 12.26 inlhr. The water table was encountered at 9 feet below ;ground surface during this investigation. Based on water table measurements conducted during Envirotrac previous site assessment, the seasonal high water table is estimated to occur at 7.S feet below ground surface. i Prepared By: Date: 1VIDM Services, .inc.. ,- . ~ ~ -- _ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ Lee_IsIQS-~. r._'-1 r_3.._ TL_. -~ _~ Nr ~ ~ 611~f- ~ ash Sf--- -- ~ II human -5t --, t , ~ L_L' ~ .. < -i_ hauser~Sl - h ~ r. 501 h. l e'.y S ---- ~ .:~ 19 ~_ I ~ -tr .. ~ ~ l+c~--, Stir=l ey St; b~ ~ g .. ~ ; - m _ I ml . Sul 'Po Bay V ~---~ :. : ~ ~ eo, . ,.:_.,~ CV ~ rwat~r.---~G~ga -~ ~d ~-~= cu'. ~ ~J. ~_--' ; ~- ~JI I ~ r SfTELbCAFION ~tca;s~ Cire~e.~ ~ 4t ~ 31 tom, -,, ~ ~ 71Fi- _:_~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 .1', ~y4,~,. > rJ omtcn--~~_~ ~t,_..~~= ~ i ~ ~. ~ C': y '~ ~1 ~t~-s~t r3th~5t-, ~ _ W, ~ ~, ~~s~ , ~, r,rt= r,, ~1 '~ ~, MDM SERVICES, `INC. Proposed Bank Atlantic Site Location Engineering and Environmental 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd Figure 1 _ f Lakeland:, Florida Pinellas County. MDM Job# 22015 I North Clearwater, Florida ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r• S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ LEGEND `~r- STANDARD PENETRATION SPT1 TEST LOCATION DRI 1 a DOUBLE. RING INFILTROMETER TEST LOCATION GULF TO BAY BLVD. (S.R. 60) MDM JGB No. PLaxs vrtLVinLV en 22°,5 MDM DSO' 0' 25' S0' FIGURE No. $6fVlCAB~ t1OC. l ~~~~~; ~ ~~ - 50' J Oif ~ [NCINCFAINC R [NYiRON4[NlAL r.0. .m ,.,~ lNm..o 2 ataW.{lY Id» .~._.~>o sula r _ sc-v cam s/2s/m ona er.. o vnaosm maces en arco¢n er. ss~ avvno~m-an 3t9~ank~4t/antic CLEARWATER. FLDRIDA PROPOSED SITE PLAN NORTH ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MDM SERVICES, INC. Proposed Bank Atlantic Soil Survey Engineering and Environmental 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Figure 3 f Lakeland; Florida Pinellas County MDM Job# 22015 I North Cleanivater, Florida DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER ' Banl: Atlantic PROJECT # 22016/1040 WATER TABLE(WT) :» ft 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd VdEATHER: 80 DEG/ sunny TEST DEPTH: 0.5'BGS ~. 3 1 / _........ - __ .._..._. _..._. A .........._ _ .................... _-_..........-- ._..._._ _...._.._,..- _....__.......... INNER RI NG ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN RINGS ELAPSED TIME/MINs WATER QUAN (Cu In) INFIL. RATE (In/Hr) V~~ATER QUAN (Cu In) INFIL. RATE (In/Hr) 15 475:86 16.84 954.03 12.64 30 390.39 13.81 910.14 12:05 45 346.50 12.26 995.61 13.19 60 346.50 12.26 910.14 12.05 75 346.50 12.26 910.14 12.05 90 346.50 12.26 910.14 - 12.05 105 346.50 12.26 910.14 12.05 120 . 346.50 . i 2.26 910.14 12.05 . ~- - MDM Services, INC LOG OF BORING SPT-1 Environmental and Engineering Lakeland, FL .....Bank ~tlantiC _.. .., _... ... Date Completed .. .. _...: 3/14/06 ...... ...._... .... _..__ _.. . ._ ....... . .. _ .. _ ... . 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd Total Depth : 14 ft Clearwater, FL Drilling Method :Split Spoon- ASTM 1586 Drilling Company : Vortek Environmental Drilling- MDM Project #220.15/1.0.40. Sampler Type ® Hand Auger Split Spoon Reptf~ ~ m ° ~ in ~ ' n U rn' a y Feet ~ ~ m DESCRtPTtON 0 SAND, dark brown, fine grained - 1 HA SP ;~': ~ ~ 10--I I ~ I 2 ~ SAND, brown, fine grained a SP D 11 g SAND, p91e brown; fine grained z 12 2 m is 2 0 - SP 4 13 O ~ 2 _ V D ,; 14 MDM Services INC , LOG OF BORING SPT-2 Environmental and Engineering Lakeland, FL _..--- Bank Atlantic ...................... .... _......:..... .._Date Completed.. ._ _ : s»aos........_ _._ __,.._ _ _ .. _ ___......................................_...._... --.. _...._._ _._. _..........._ .......: _.... -- 2498 Guff to Bay Blvd Total Depth : 14 ft Clearwater, FL Drilling Method :Split Spoon- ASTM 1566 Drilling Company : Vortek Environmental Drilling MDM Project #22015/1040 Sampler Type ' Hand Auger ® Split Spoon Depth in ~ m a c o' U ~ m ~ Feet ~ ~ in DESCRIPTION j ~ 0 SAND, dark brown, fine grained 1 HA SR :' 2 SAND, pale brown, fine grained 3 . HA Sp =' 4 6 2 SAND, dark trrown, fine grained 2 s SP :`~ 2 7 1 2 8 s . SAND, brown, fine grained SP .~- 2 9 . s 10 a 2 SAND, brown, fine grained 2 SP ;:,: 11 SAND l f i o g , Pa e grown, ne gra ned ~, - -.• ~.~ _.; n 2 12 m m 2 SP m 13 3 o 0 ¢ ? 94 . MDM Services INC , LOG OF BORING SPT-3 Environmental and Engineering Lakeland, FL _...Bank-Attantlc . -...... _..... .. Date Completed _._,....._: 3l14/ps .... _ ._...... __ .... _.. .: _ __. _.... ...._ ... ___.. ..... 2498 Gulf to- Bay Blvd Total Depot : 14. tY. Clearwater, FL Drilling Method :Split. Spoon- ASTM 1586 Drilling Company :Nortek Environmental Drilling - MDM Project #22015/1040 Sampler Type ® Hand Auger ~] Split Spoon Depth in m ~ ~ 'm m o ~ o U - ~ U . Feet ~ ~ . - m DESCRtPTtO.N ~ ~ 0 SAND, brown, fine grained 1 HA SP :` 2 SAND, pale brown, fine grained ' 3 4 , 5 ~ SAND, dark brown, fine grained 2 6 Sp ._': - 2 ~ ~ SAND, brown, fine grained - 2 8 SP ~ " 3 9 10 , SAND, pale brown, fine grained 'a. WOh 11 1 " - 2 ;= 12 SR : ~. z m 1 9 ~ - j3 2 g N 14 9 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BANK ATLANTIC PREPARED FOR Bank Atlantic 2478 GULF TO BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAY 24, 2006 PREPARED BY Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. Land Development Design and Permitting Services 1118 South Florida Ave. Lakeland, Florida 33803-1379 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DE?ARTMEIVT CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAINAGE CALCULATI®N SIGNATURE PAGE For: Bank Atlantic 2478 Gulf To Bay Blvd. Clearwater, Florida 1 Prepared By: ' Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Ave. Lakeland, Florida 33803-1379 Tel: 863-802-1500 Fax 863-802-1505 William Y. Harrell, P.E. Florida P.E. No. 7729 ORIGINAL ~ JAN O 9y, ~,~ •~~~ RECEIVED ,..'' ~......• c~r~`',~'.., JPJ~ 14 2006 '~~~•'~ PLANNING DEPA17iIViENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'I'ABT_,E OF CON'T'ENTS Project Narrative APPENDIX A DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS CURVE NUMBERS AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION APPENDIX B MODRET ANALYSIS INPUT, RECOVERY AND GRAPHS APPENDIX C FDOT 14-86 CALCULATIONS APPENDIX D Vicinity Map Pre-Condition Map Post-Condition Map Other Details Geotechnical Report ~.~,. , '~.~l~ i 4 Zoos PLANNIrvc; u~rHrztiv~ENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Proiect Narrative For Draina;~e ~a~k Atla>>itic Clearwater, Florida Site Location The proposed site in which Bank Atlantic will occupy is located at 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, Florida. The site is 0.96 acres. Bank Atlantic will lease the property from the owner (Murphy and Murphy). Pre development This site was previously (2) parcels; the owner has recorded a unity of title for the two lots. One parcel consisted of a closed gas station and the other parcel is vacant. The existing impervious area is 18333.74 sgft and the existing pervious area is 23619.48 sgft. The Predevelonment Curve is: USE Area CN Impervious 0.421 Ac 98 42.83 Pervious 0.542 Ac 79 41.65 Post development The site post development condition will require treatment. The treatment will be done using trench drains. The recovery analysis was done using Modret software for Dry Ponds. ' The Post Devetoument Curve is: ORIGINAL RECEIVED USE Area CN Impervious 0.653 Ac 98 42.84 JUL 14 2006 Pervious 0.309 Ac 79 41.65 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' CIN OF CLEARWATER Surface Water Management Design ' A permit application for a General Permit has been submitted to SWFWMD, and the site is designed in accordance with SWFWMD design requirements and the City of Clearwater standards. This project consists of main building with associated paved parking, drive isles, landscape areas and an underground retention system (Stormtech) to retain 0.5" over the site area. At the present time the site is developed and has an old building with a small parking lot. The site contains fine sand with mild to moderate slopes. The seasonal High Water Table is estimated to be at 7.5 inches below ground surface. Based on sandy soils encountered at the boring and the results of the double ring infiltrometer test (12.26 in/hr), the soil at the site should be considered hydrologic group B. r In the post condition, the surface water management system is designed to retain .OS" over the site for water quality pre-treatment. Our design was modeled using Modret software taking into account infiltration during ' the storm event. A safety factor of two was utilized for modeling purposes. Water and Wastewater Faciliti es ' The City of Clearwater Utilities will provide water and wastewater services to the site. Operation and Maintenance ' The owner will operate and mamtam the storm water management system as designed by the engineer. Any ' debris or trash accumulated in the trench system will be collected and properly disposed of. The drainage pipes and the dbi's will be checked at least once a year for accumulation of trash and sediments. If necessary, the drainage system will be properly cleaned. ' Site Erosion Control Plan ' All vegetative cover will be placed as soon as possible on all exposed areas. These areas should be stabilized before any extended period of construction shutdown. Refer to plans for sod, seed and mulch areas. Land grading will be allowed only in the areas of immediate construction. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~UL 14 ZQQ6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' BASIN 1 RULE 14-86 STORMS RESULTS Pond 100year 10 Year 25 Year 2 Year 50 Year 5 Year Config Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Table 5.3-4 1-hour Pre 5.8 3.9 ~ 4.8 3.0 5.2 3.3 Post 5.8 3.9 4.8 3.0 5.2 3.3 2-hour Pre 4.5 2.9 3.5 1.8 4.0 2.4 Post 4.9 3.3 3.9 2.2 4.6 2.8 4-hour Pre 3.0 1.8 2.1 1.2 2.5 1.6 Post 3.3 2.0 2.4 1.4 2.7 1.9 8-hour Pre 2.8 2.0 2.3 1.4 2.8 1.9 Post 2.9 2.1 2.5 1.6 2.9 2.0 24-hour Pre 0.94 0.69 0.79 0.43 0.93 0.57 Post 0.94 0.69 0.79 0.43 0.93 0.57 3-day Pre 0.66 0.44 0.52 0.35 0.64 0.37 72 Post 0.66 0.44 0.52 0.35 0.64 0.37 7-day Pre 0.48 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.42 0.28 168 Post 0.48 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.43 0.28 10-day Pre 0.63 0.43 0.49 0.27 0.61 0.36 Post 0.63 0.43 0.49 0.28 0.61 0.36 ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER APPENDIX A DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ' CURVE NUMBERS AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION t ORIGINAL RECEIVED ' ~u± 14 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' CITY OF CLEARWATER Site Area Basin 1 Basin 1 Calculations for the Pre- Condition Area. Existing Conditions Variables for Mathcad Total site area=41953.22 sgft or 0.963 acres I := 0.421 ac or 18333.74 sgft Total impervious area P := 0.542 ac or 23619.48 sgft Total pervious area At := I + P At = 0.963 ac site area Proposed Conditions Variables for Mathcad Total site area= 41953.22 sgft or 0.963 acres Ip := 0.653 ac or 28464.10 sqf Pp := 0.309 ac or 13489.12 sqf Abp := Ip + Pp Abp = 0.962 acres Total impervious area Total pervious area ORIGINAL RECENED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Curve Number for the Pre Condition 98•I + 79•P CN :_ At Pi := 98• I Pi = 42.843 At P Ppe := 74•- Ppe = 41.649 At CN = 87.306 (Pre) Curve Number for the Post Condition The soil group is either C, Therefore, CN for the pervious area is assumed to be 74 Ip CNp := 98•Ip~b 79•Pp Ipp := 98• Abp Ipp = 66.522 P CNp = 91.897 (Post) PPP '= 74• Ab Ppp = 23.769 P ASSUMPTIONS Time of Concentration (Pre) Tc Assume 10 minutes overland to first inlet & 413 ft in pipe st 4.5 ft/sec. len := 413 len := 413 len Tcpr:= 10 + 4.5.60 Tcpr = 11.53 min (Pre) Time of Concentration (Post) Tcp Assume 10 minutes overland to first inlet & 413 ft in pipe st 4.5 ft/sec Tc 10 + len p :_ 4.5.60 Tcp = 11.53 min (Post) ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 1 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEf'ARiIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SCS RUN-OFF VOLUME CALCULATION POND SIZING METHOD Runoff Volume for Pre and Post Condition S=1000/CN-10 10001 Spre := CN I - 10 Sire = 1.454 finches 1000 Spost:= CNPJ - 10 Spost = 0.882 f inches P=100 YR, 24 HRS RAINFALL DEPTH= 13.44 INCHES P := 13.4 inches therefore the runoff depth equation is Q=((P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S) Runoff depth Pre= P + .8Spre Q = 1i.8 inches Runoff depth Post= Qpost ._ ((P - .ZSpost))2 P + .8Spost Qpost = 12.397 aches Total increase in runoff depth= trunoff := Qpost - Q trunoff = 0.597 inches ORIGINAL (5) RECEIVED ~UL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPAf2TIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RUNOFF VOLUME: Basin including the pond= Abp runofN :_ (Q'Abp) PRE 12 runofN = 0.946 acre - ft (Qpost•Abp) runoff VP := POST 12 runoffVP = 0.994 acre - ft The estimated Peak attenuation volume is Total increase in runoff Totalrunoff := runoff VP - runofN Totalrunoff = 0.048 acre - ft ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~UL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER APPENDIX B MODRET ANALYSIS INPUT, RECOVERY AND GRAPHS ~ MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : cwb POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio {L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/E~ltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: 1,610.00 ft2 2,004.00 ft3 10.00 43.50 ft 48.50 ft 51.50 ft 51.50 ft 53.60 ft 0.30 24.00 ft/d 2.00 20.00 ft/d 0.11 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right Groundwater Control features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N 0.00 0.00 N 0.00 0.00 Impervious Barrier - YJN Elevation of Barrier Bottom N N 0.00 0.00 N 0.00 N 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Analysis Date: b/30/2006 MODRET TIME -RUNOFF INPUT DATA PR07ECT NAME: CWT STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) L)nsat 1.80 1,449.00 i 1.00 555.00 2 8.65 0.00 3 8.65 0.00 4 8.65 0.00 5 $.65 0.00 6 8.65 0.00 7 8.65 OAO 8 8.65 0.00 9 8.65 0.00 Analysis Date: 6/30/2006 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~~ 1 ~ zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PR07ECT NAME : cv~b CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE {cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW {ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 48.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 4$.500 0.15409 0.13254 2.80 52.200 0.11099 0.00 0.04443 6.98 51.500 0.02875 0.00 OA1307 20.10 50.324 0.01072 0.00 0.00837 28.75 50.051 0.00718 0.00 0.00600 37.40 49.855 0.00530 0.00 OA0459 46.05 49.705 0.00412 0.00 0.00365 54.70 49.586 0.00332 0.00 0.00299 63.35 49.488 0.00275 0.00 0.00250 72.00 49.406 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 52.200 feet @ 2.80 hours ORIGINAL Recovery @ 6.977 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff RECEIVED Maximum Infiltration Rate: 12.000 ft/day rrnaoyaia ~a~c: v/w/cvvv PLANNING DEPAk9~v~ENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~1 ~i 1 m ~ ~ c a 0 'C n R.s ~ Z r m ~ G) ~. !~ - mD ~ m <~ ~ ~ o ~ _ .~ _ m r, ~ ~ INFILTRATION : CWR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 2,004 ft INFILTRATION : CWB 52 c 0 '~ d w d m n Z O Z Z I_ O 51.! rn ~ o n G7 ~ m O Z ~ fV ~~ 7 O D ~ Q7 m m ~ Z -t 1 2 g a ° " Time (hrs) Max Water Elevation = 52.20 ft APPENDIX C FDOT 14-86 CALCULATIONS ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~~ 1 ~ zoos PLANNING DEPkRTNlENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' BASIN 1 RULE 14-86 ~TnR M~ R RRT TT .Tfi Pond 100year 10 Year 25 Year 2, Year 50 Year 5 Year Config Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Table 5.3-4 1-hour Pre 5.8 3.9 4.8 3.0 5.2 33 Post 5.8 3.9 4.8 3.0 5.2 3.3 2-hour Pre 4.5 2.9 3.5 1.8 4.0 2.4 Post 4.9 3.3 3.9 2.2 4.6 2.8 4-hour Pre 3.0 1.8 2.1 1.2 2.5 1.6 Post 3.3 2.0 2.4 1.4 2.7 1.9 8-hour Pre 2.8 2.0 2.3 1.4 2.8 1.9 Post 2.9 2.1 2.5 1.6 2.9 2.0 24-hour Pre 0.94 0.69 0.79 0.43 0.93 0.57 Post 0.94 0.69 0.79 0.43 0.93 0.57 3-day Pre 0.66 0.44 0.52 0.35 0.64 037 72 Post 0.66 0.44 0.52 0.35 0.64 0.37 7-day Pre 0.48 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.42 0.28 168 Post 0.48 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.43 028 10-day Pre 0.63 0.43 0.49 0.27 0.61 0.36 Post 0.63 0.43 0.49 0.28 0.61 0.36 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 17.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ', Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.480 Runoff Volume (in): 15.322 Runoff Volume (ft3): 53395.847 ' Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 11.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 ' DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max {hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.308 Runoff Volume (in): 9.386 Runoff Volume (ft3): 32706.825 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite ' Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ~ Area (ac): 0.960 ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 19 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.380 Runoff Volume (in): 11.853 Runoff Volume (ft3): 41306.377 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in) 8.000 Storm Duration (hrs) 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA ($): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.221 Runoff Volume (in): 6.447 Runoff Volume (ft3): 22465.247 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in) 15.000 Storm Duration (hrs) 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs) 0.423 Runoff Volume (in): 13.339 Runoff Volume (ft3): 46482.190 Basin Name: bast Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 19 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 10.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift {hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA {g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.279 Runoff Volume (in): 8.402 Runoff Volume (ft3): 29280.574 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.68 Flow Max (cfs): 5.137 Runoff Volume (in): 3.186 Runoff Volume {ft3): 11103.744 ' Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph t Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.300 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.68 ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPAK((vitNl CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 19 Flow Max (cfs): 3.273 Runoff Volume (in): 2.000 Runoff Volume (ft3): 6968.394 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in) 3.900 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g) 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 0.68 Flow Max (cfs) 4.127 Runoff Volume (in): 2.540 Runoff Volume (ft3): 8852.400 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H2Y Node Name: bass Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 2.700 Storm Duration (hrs) 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.68 Flow Max (cfs): 2.438 Runoff Volume (in): 1.477 Runoff Volume (ft3): 5147.166 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEF'AKsMI:NT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 19 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 4.200 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (°s): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 0.68 Flow Max {cfs): 4.558 Runoff Volume (in): 2.815 Runoff Volume (ft3): 9811.401 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 2.900 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.68 Flow Max (cfs) 2.714 Runoff Volume (in): 1.649 Runoff Volume (ft3): 5745.564 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in): 19.000 Storm Duration (hrs) 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 183.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.628 Runoff Volume (in): 17.311 Runoff Volume (ft3): 60326.716 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~UL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPtikI)v1ENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 5 of 19 Basin Name: bast Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~) 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 183.99 Flow Max (cfs) 0.426 Runoff Volume (in) 11.360 Runoff Volume (ft3) 39588.006 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in) 15.000 Storm Duration (hrs) 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g) 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 183.99 Flow Max (cfs) 0.493 Runoff Volume (in) 13.340 Runoff Volume (ft3): 46487.507 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in) 8.500 Storm Duration (hrs) 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~.~L 14 200 PLANNING DEF'1~i~7MENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 6 of 19 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 183.99 ' Flow Max (cfs): 0.273 Runoff Volume (in): 6.935 Runoff Volume {ft3): 24166.201 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 240HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 ' Rainfall Amount (in) 18.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max {hrs): 183.99 , Flow Max (cfs) 0.611 Runoff Volume (in): 16.814 ' Runoff Volume {ft3): 58594.702 ------------------------ Basin Name: ----------------------------------------- basl --------------- ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H5Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 ' Rainfall Amount (in) 11.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 vol of unit xyd (in): l.ooo ORIGINAL curve Number: 87. o0o RECEIVED DCIA tg): o.ooo ' Time Max (hrs): 183.99 .~U L 1 4 200 Flow Max (cfs): 0.358 Runoff volume (in) : 9.387 PLANNING DEPAItI(wENI' ' Runoff Volume (ft3) : ------------------------ 32710.699 ----------------------------------------- CITY OF CLEARWATER --------------- Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24H100Y ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 7 of 19 Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 10.000 Storm Duration {hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area {ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.912 Runoff Volume (in): 8.402 Runoff Volume (ft3): 29277.669 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.650 Runoff Volume (in): 5.863 Runoff Volume (ft3): 20432.241 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24H25Y Node Name: ba~sl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 ' Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 8.400 ' Storm Duration (hrs) 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.950 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~J~. 1 ~ 2006 PLANNING C?~t~-µr.: ~J)ENT' CITY OE CLEARWATER Page 8 of 19 ' Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.751 Runoff Volume (in): 6.836 Runoff Volume (ft3): 23820.849 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc {min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc {min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.800 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd {in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs) 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.386 Runoff Volume (in): 3.377 Runoff Volume (ft3): 11769.112 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24HSOY Node Name: ball Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in) 9.800 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.892 Runoff Volume (in): 8.205 Runoff Volume (ft3): 28593.722 ------------------------------------------------ Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24HSY Node Name: bast Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 9 of 19 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 6.200 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.529 Runoff Volume (in): 4.706 Runoff Volume (ft3): 16399.582 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25Y24H Node Name: bast Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 8.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA {$): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.05 Flow Max (cfs): 4.405 Runoff Volume (in): 7.031 Runoff Volume (ft3): 24500.875 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 4.471 Runoff Volume (in): 4.123 Runoff Volume (ft3): 14369.304 ORIGINAL RECEIVED J9JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 10 of ] 9 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 4.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 .DCIA (°s): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 2.866 Runoff Volume (in): 2.628 Runoff Volume (ft3): 9159.570 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in) 4.600 Storm Duration (hrs) 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 0.86 Flow Max (cfs) 3.465 Runoff Volume (in): 3.183 Runoff Volume (ft3) 11090.393 1 . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 2.900 Storm Duration (hrs) 2.00 ' ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~ 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 11 of 19 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 1.793 Runoff Volume (in): 1.647 Runoff Volume (ft3): 5737.750 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.200 Storm Duration (hrs): 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 4.067 Runoff Volume (in): 3.745 Runoff Volume (ft3): 13050.322 --------------------- Basin Name: ----------------------------------------- bass --------------- Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac) 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 ORIGINAL curve Number: 87.000 RECEIVED DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 J U L 1 4 2006 Flow Max {cfs): 2.373 Runoff Volume (in) : z.17s PLANNING DEPARTMENT Runoff volume (ft3) : 7580.830 CITY OF CLEARWATER Basin Name: basl Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 12 of 19 Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 4H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 7.200 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 2.05 Flow Max (cfs): 3.035 Runoff Volume (in): 5.667 Runoff Volume (ft3): 19747.006 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in) 4.800 Storm Duration (hrs) 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~) 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 2.08 Flow Max (cfs): 1.833 Runoff Volume (in) 3.375 Runoff Volume (ft3) 11762.520 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~J~ 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 13 of 19 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 2.08 Flow Max (cfs): 2.132 Runoff Volume (in): 3.941 Runoff Volume (ft3): 13733.329 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H2Y Node Name: bass Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 2.49 Flow Max (cfs) 1.153 Runoff Volume (in): 2.090 Runoff Volume (ft3): 7283.847 ------------------------ Basin Name: ------------------------------- basl ------------------------- Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in) 6.200 Storm Duration (hrs) 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac) 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 2.05 Flow Max (cfs): 2.534 Runoff Volume (in): 4.704 Runoff Volume (ft3): 16390.873 ORIGINAL ---------- -------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------- RECEIVED Basin Name: basl J~J ~ 1 4 2005 Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H5Y Node Name: basl PLANNING DEPARTMENT Basin Type: SCS unit Hydrograph CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 14 of 19 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 ' Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac) 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 2.08 Flow Max (cfs): 1.633 Runoff Volume (in) 3.002 Runoff Volume (ft3) r 10462.713 _________________________ Basin Name: _____________________________________ basl __________________ Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 72H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 14.000 ' Storm Duration (hrs) 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 59.99 Flow Max (cfs) 0.662 Runoff Volume (in): 12.349 Runoff Volume (ft3): 43033.609 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 72H10Y Node Name: bast Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 9.500 ORIGINAL Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 RECEIVED status: onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 f Time Shi ( (l JtJL 14 2006 ~ ea ac) : 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 PLANNING DEPA~21ivIEN1' DCIA (%> : o.ooo CITY OF CLEARWATER Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.443 ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 15 of 19 Runoff Volume (in): 7.913 Runoff Volume (ft3) 27573.484 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: U'h256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc {min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 11.000 Storm Duration (hrs) 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in). 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (o): 0.000 Time Max {hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.516 Runoff Volume (in): 9.386 Runoff Volume (ft3) 32709.198 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc {min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.345 Runoff Volume (in) 5.961 Runoff Volume (ft3): 20773.872 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72HSOY Node Name: bast Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 16 of 19 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.500 ' Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.638 Runoff Volume (in): 11.854 Runoff Volume (ft3): 41309.304 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 8.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc {min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (o): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs) 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.369 Runoff Volume (in): 6.447 Runoff Volume (ft3): 22466.953 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 8H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 2.803 Runoff Volume (in): 5.960 Runoff Volume (ft3): 20770.121 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Tectuiologies, Inc. Page 17 of 19 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: SH10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.600 Storn Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 1.999 Runoff Volume {in): 4.133 Runoff Volume (ft3): 14402.699 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: SH25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in) 6.400 Storm Duration (hrs) 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 2.338 Runoff Volume (in): 4.898 Runoff Volume {ft3) 17068.466 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 8H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.300 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 RLANNING DEPAIZ"11~nt:NT CITY OE CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 18 of 19 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (k): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 4.01 ' Flow Max (cfs): 1.445 Runoff Volume (in): 2.911 Runoff Volume (ft3): 10145.700 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 8HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-e ' Rainfall Amount (in): 7.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 2.803 Runoff Volume (in): 5.960 Runoff Volume (ft3): 20770.121 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: SHSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 87.000 DCIA ($): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 1.914 Runoff Volume (in): 3.943 Runoff Volume (ft3): 13740.828 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARIryIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 19 of 19 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time InC (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 17.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.482 Runoff Volume (in) 15.992 Runoff Volume (ft3) 55728.619 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in) 11.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift {hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.311 Runoff Volume (in): 10.017 Runoff Volume (ft3): 34905.633 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.950 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~, 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 19 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 ' Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (°s): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.382 Runoff Volume (in): 12.504 Runoff Volume (ft3): 43574.031 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc {min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 8.000 ' Storm Duration (hrs) 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift {hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.225 Runoff Volume (in): 7.040 Runoff Volume (ft3): 24533.663 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 168H50Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 15.000 ' Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs): 0.425 Runoff Volume (in): 13.998 Runoff Volume (ft3): 48781.136 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 168HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~JI. 14 2006 PLANNING DEPl~.KiN11:NT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 19 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-168 Rainfall Amount (in): 10.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 168.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 159.98 Flow Max (cfs) 0.282 Runoff Volume (in): 9.023 Runoff Volume (ft3): 31443.466 ------------------------ Basin Name: ----------------------------------------- basl --------------- Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: i7Y1256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 4.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~) 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 0.66 Flow Max (cfs) 5.836 Runoff Volume (in) 3.693 Runoff Volume (ft3) 12869.741 ------------------------ Basin Name: ----------------------------------------- basl --------------- Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.300 ORIGINAL Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 status: onsite RECEIVED Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ~ U L 1 4 2006 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 curve Number: 92.000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' DCIA (~) : o. o0o CITY OF CLEARWATER Time Max (hrs): 0.66 ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 1.9 Flow Max (cfs): 3.905 Runoff Volume (in): 2.441 Runoff Volume (ft3): 8507.997 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.900 Storm Duration {hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.66 Flow Max (cfs): 4.795 Runoff Volume (in): 3.016 Runoff Volume (ft3): 10509.726 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in) 2.700 Storm Duration (hrs) 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA ($): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.68 Flow Max (cfs) 3.023 Runoff Volume (in): 1.876 Runoff Volume (ft3): 6536.701 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 200fi PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 19 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.200 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.66 Flow Max (cfs): 5.241 Runoff Volume (in): 3.305 Runoff Volume (ft3): 11518.506 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 1HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount (in): 2.900 Storm Duration (hrs): 1.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.66 Flow Max (cfs) 3.314 Runoff Volume (in): 2.063 Runoff Volume (ft3) 7189.478 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in) 19.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite ORIGINAL Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time shift (hrs> : o.oo RECEIVED Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 J U L 1 4 2006 DCIA (~): 0.000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Time Max (hrs) : 183.99 CITY OF CLEA Flow Max (efs): 0.631 RWATER Runoff Volume (in): 17.989 Runoff Volume (ft3) 62686.734 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 5 of 19 ' Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H10Y ' Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 ' Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area {ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 183.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.430 ' Runoff Volume (in): 12.008 Runoff Volume (ft3): 41843.822 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in): 15.000 ' Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 183.99 ' Flow Max (cfs): 0.497 Runoff Volume (in): 14.000 Runoff Volume (ft3): 48786.482 ------------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.97 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 8.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVEQ J~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DENk(r(I~(tNT CIN OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 19 ~` Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 183.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.279 Runoff Volume (in): 7.536 Runoff Volume (ft3): 26261.815 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240H50Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in): 18.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 183.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.614 Runoff Volume (in): 17.490 Runoff Volume (ft3): 60948.426 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 240HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-240 Rainfall Amount (in): 11.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 240.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 183.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.363 Runoff Volume (in): 10.018 Runoff Volume (ft3): 34909.544 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 24H100Y ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~JL 14 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 7 of 19 dame: bast e: SCS Unit Hydrograph . ph: Uh256 itor: 256.0 n): 1.47 ~n) : 1.47 le: Fdot-24 ,in): 10.000 irs): 24.00 us: Onsite ~n): 11.00 s): 0.00 ;ac): 0.960 ;in): 1.000 er: 92.000 %): 0.000 irs): 12.00 s): 0.944 n): 9.022 3): 31440.527 ----------------------------------- me: basl fame: BASE .ion: 24H10Y me: basl ~e: SCS Unit Hydrograph aph: Uh256 .tor: 256.0 n) 1.47 n): 1.47 _le: Fdot-24 in): 7.400 s): 24.00 us: Onsite n): 11.00 s): 0.00 ac): 0.960 n): 1.000 er: 92.000 %): 0.000 rs): 12.00 ~s): 0.688 n): 6.446 3) 22464.016 ------------------------------------------------------- me: basl ame: BASE ion: 24H25Y ~e: basl e: SCS Unit Hydrograph aph: Uh256 or: 256.0 n) 1.47 n): 1.47 ile: Fdot-24 in): 8.400 s): 24.00 us: Onsite n): 11.00 rs): 0.00 sc): 0.960 n): 1.000 er: 92..000 %) 0.000 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 8 of I9 6I .Io 6 a~Bd 'ouI `sat~oiouu~a;i, acnlurea-4S ZOOZOJ (?Id~I) tapoy~I ~ut~no~I paod put tauusq~ pa;oauuo~.za~tzl 0`95Z ~zo~Eg bu?xEad 95ZLT,(1 :gdazbozp~CH ~?un 2131bM21d31~ ~O Jlll~ udEZbozptCH ~?un SJS ~ adtC,y LITSE$ 1N3~+P)21`d~l3C] JNINNb+Id iseq :awEN apoN .CSHbZ :uo?3ETnw?S 007 ~ T ~~~~ G L 3Stig :awEN dnozJ is2q :awEN u?sag a3n13~3~ --------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1dN19R10 S£9'8bL0£ ~(E~3) awnToA 33oung bZ8'8 : (u?) awnToA 33o~2I SZ6'0 :(s3o) xEW MoT3 00'Zi :(szq) xEW aw?y 000'0 ~($) KIJQ 000'Z6 :zagwnN anznJ 000'i ~(u?) P~H 3?uR 3o ToA 096'0 :(oa) aaz~ 00'0 :(szu) 33?qS aw?y 00'ii :(u?w) ouoJ 3o aw?y a~?sup :sn~E~S 00"bZ :(szr~) uo?3EZnQ wzo~S 008 6 ~(u?) ~unourd TTE3u?Eg bZ-~oP3 ~aT?3 TTE3u?Eg Lb'i :(u?w) ouI awry dwoJ Lb'i :(u?w) ouI aw?y Dads O'95Z :zo~E3 bu?xEag 95ZLLf1 :gdezbozp~Cg ~?un udezbozp~CH ~?uR SJS ~ ad.{y u?seg isaq :awEN apoN AOSHSZ =uo?~ajnw?S gSyg :awEN dnozp _______________ iSEq :aWEN IITSE$ _________________________________________________________________ LS£'Z95£T =(£'33) awnToA 330~~ Z68' £ ~ (u?) awnToA 33oT~T~Zi SZ6'0 :(s3o) xeW MOTS 00'Zi :(szq) XEW awry 000'0 ~($) FIIJQ 000'Z6 ~zagwnN anznJ 000'i ~(u?) P~H 3?uR 3o IoA 096'0 :(OE} aaz~ 00'0 ~(SZu) 33?LIS aw?y 00'ii ~(u?w) ouoJ 3o aw?y a~?sup :sn~E~S 00"bZ :(szt{) uo?~EZnQ wzo~S - 008 b ~ (iZT) '~unOwFj '['[E3IITE~ bZ-3oP3 'aT?3 TTa3u?~i Lb'i (u?w) ouI aw?y dwoJ L6'i ~(u?w) ouI aw?y Dads O'9SZ :zo~E3 bu?XEaa 95ZLTf1 :gdEZbozp~CH ~?un gdEZbozp~CH ~?uR SJS ~ ad~Cy u?seg iseq :awEN apoN F.ZHbZ :uo?~ETnw?S 3SK$ :awEN dnoz~ isaq ~aweN u?seg 89i'ii65Z ~(£~3) awnToA 33oung S£b'L :(u?) awnToA 33oun~ LSL'0 ~ (s3o) ~YS MoT3 00'Zi ~(szu) xEW aw?y Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-24 Rainfall Amount (in): 6.200 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (g): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.00 Flow Max (cfs): 0.568 Runoff Volume (in): 5.263 Runoff Volume (ft3): 18341.132 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25Y24H Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 8.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 . Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs) 12.05 Flow Max (cfs): 4.630 Runoff Volume (in): 7.634 Runoff Volume (ft3): 26601.517 --------------------- Basin Name: ------------------------------------------ bass -------------- Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.600 storm Duration (hrs) 2.00 ORIGINAL status: onsite RECEIVED Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 J U L 1 4 2006 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DCIA ($): 0.000 CITY OF CLEARWATER Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (efs) 4.973 Runoff Volume (in) 4.664 Runoff Volume (ft3): 16253.358 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 10 of 19 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 2H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 4.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 3.352 Runoff Volume (in): 3.109 Runoff Volume (ft3): 10833.477 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 2H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 4.600 Storm Duration (hrs) 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 3.960 Runoff Volume (in): 3.689 Runoff Volume (ft3): 12855.824 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 2.900 Storm Duration (hrs): 2.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~UL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARW,gTER t Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 11 of 19 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 2.240 Runoff Volume (in): 2.061 Runoff Volume (ft3): 7180.990 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.200 Storm Duration {hrs): 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (°s): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 4.568 Runoff Volume (in) 4.273 Runoff Volume (ft3): 14891.124 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 2HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-2 Rainfall Amount (in) 3.500 Storm Duration (hrs) 2.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 0.86 Flow Max (cfs): 2.846 Runoff Volume (in): 2.629 Runoff Volume (ft3): 9162.089 Basin Name: basl ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~U! 14 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 12 of 19 Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 1 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.200 ' Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 ' . Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 2.05 ' Flow Max (cfs) 3.261 Runoff Volume (in): 6.246 Runoff Volume (ft3): 21765.257 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph t Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.800 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift {hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (°s): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 2.05 Flow Max (cfs): 2.071 Runoff Volume (in): 3.890 Runoff Volume {ft3): 13555.504 Basin Name: basl t Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~eJL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 13 of 19 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 2.05 Flow Max (cfs): 2.370 Runoff Volume (in): 4.476 Runoff Volume (ft3): 15597.182 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 3.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA {%); 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 2.05 Flow Max (cfs): 1.370 Runoff Volume (in): 2.538 Runoff Volume (ft3): 8845.365 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 6.200 Storm Duration (hrs) 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac) 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 ORIGINAL Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~) o.ooo RECEIVED Time Max (hrs): 2.05 ~~J L 1 4 2006 Flow Max (cfs) 2.767 Runoff Volume (in): 5.261 Runoff Volume (ft3) : 18332.197 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 4HSY Node Name: bass Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 14 of 19 Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 ' Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-4 Rainfall Amount (in): 4.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 4.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 2.05 ' Flow Max (cfs): 1.871 Runoff Volume (in) 3.501 Runoff Volume (ft3): 12200.560 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72H100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 14.000 ' Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 59.99 ' Flow Max (cfs): 0.668 Runoff Volume (in): 13.003 Runoff Volume (ft3): 45312.386 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 72H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 9.500 ORIGINAL storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 status: onsite RECEIVED Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ~ 2U0~1 ~,J~ 1 l3iJ ' Area (ac) : 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 curve Number: 92.000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DCIA (~): 0.000 CITY OF CLEARWATER Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.451 ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 15 of i 9 Runoff Volume (in): 8.527 Runoff Volume (ft3): 29715.997 Basin Name: bast Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 11.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift {hrs): 0.00 Area {ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (g) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.523 Runoff Volume (in) 10.017 Runoff Volume {ft3): 34908.028 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72H2Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in) 7.500 Storm Duration (hrs) 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs) 0.354 Runoff Volume (in): 6.546 Runoff Volume (ft3): 22812.156 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72HSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 16 of 19 r Rainfall Amount (in): 13.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 72.00 ' Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA ($): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 59.99 ' Flow Max (cfs): 0.644 Runoff Volume (in): 12.505 Runoff Volume (ft3): 43576.977 ----------------- Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: 72HSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 8.000 Storm Duration {hrs): 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac) 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA ($) 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 59.99 Flow Max (cfs) 0.378 Runoff Volume (in): 7.041 Runoff Volume (ft3): 24535.397 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: SH100Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 ' Rainfall Amount (in): 7.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA ($): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 3.98 Flow Max (cfs): 2.940 Runoff Volume (in): 6.545 Runoff Volume (ft3) 22808.334 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~ 14 2006 PLANNING DEPA~z6NIEIVT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 17 of 19 Rainfall Amount (in): 13.500 Storm Duration (hrs) 72.00 ' Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 59.99 ' Flow Max (cfs): 0.644 Runoff Volume (in): 12.505 Runoff Volume (ft3): 43576.977 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: 72H5Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-72 Rainfall Amount (in): 8.000 ' Storm Duration (hrs) 72.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac) 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA ($): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs) 59.99 Flow Max (cfs): 0.378 Runoff Volume (in): 7.041 Runoff Volume (ft3): 24535.397 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: SHl00Y Node Name: bast Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.500 Storm Duration (hrs) 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 3.98 Flow Max (cfs): 2.940 Runoff Volume (in) 6.545 Runoff Volume (ft3) 22808.334 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~Jl~ 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 17 of 19 Basin Name: basl ' Group Name: BASE Simulation: 8H10Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 ' Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 ' DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 2.149 Runoff Volume (in): 4.674 ' Runoff Volume (ft3): 16287.782 Basin Name: bass Group Name: BASE ~ Simulation: 8H25Y Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 6.400 Storm Duration (hrs) 8.00 Status: Onsite ' Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (o) 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 3.98 Flow Max (cfs): 2.483 Runoff Volume (in) 5.460 ' Runoff Volume (ft3): 19026.945 ---------- Basin Name: ------------------------------------------ basl -------------- Group Name: BASE Simulation: 8H2Y Node Name: ball ORIGINAL Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph RECEIVED ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 ~ U ~ 1 4 200~i Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 ' comp Time Inc (min) 1.47 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in> : 4.300 CITY OF CLEARW,4TER Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs) 0.00 ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 18 of 19 Area (ac): 0.960 ' Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 4.01 ' Flow Max (cfs): 1.604 Runoff Volume (in): 3.406 Runoff Volume (ft3): 11868.869 ---------------- Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE ' Simulation: SHSOY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 ' Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 7.500 ', Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac) 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (°s) 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 3.98 Flow Max (cfs): 2.940 Runoff Volume (in): 6.545 Runoff Volume (ft3): 22808.334 Basin Name: basl Group Name: BASE Simulation: SHSY Node Name: basl Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: iJh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 1.47 Comp Time Inc (min): 1.47 Rainfall File: Fdot-8 Rainfall Amount (in): 5.400 Storm Duration (hrs): 8.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 11.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 ' Area (ac) 0.960 Vol of Unit Hyd (in) 1.000 Curve Number: 92.000 DCIA (~): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 4.01 Flow Max (cfs): 2.065 Runoff volume (in): 4.478 Runoff Volume {ft3): 15604.926 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~, 14 2000 PLANNING DEpf+rtt~ti~I~T CIN OF CLEARVJ.~`tER Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 42002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 19 of 19 APPENDIX D VICINITY MAP PRE-CONDITION MAP POST-CONDITION MAP OTHER DETAILS GEOTECHNICAL REPORT ~l Map of Gulf To Bay Blvd & S Old Coachman Rd Clearwater, FL by MapQuest MAPQi/~ST. - ~ Gulf To Bay Blvd & S Old Coachman Rd Clearwater, FL 33765, US . MA-'tiVlF'~T..; ~ sE~3 -- U'Jtutrn8rs St ~~ ¢ .__ ~ -::.. :.... ~~ ~ ~ 1 3 ~~ ,~ ~, ~ .~.~ ~ ~ ~ ai ____ ,a ~ j ~ _ `'~ ~._. _ Sh~ile '~ -.. .. .T ~ .. i~ . '{~ _ ....~. :rr ,...... ... ._ a _.. ... ._ ~ t ~s yyC 3 ~ 2 J pL t } .. ! -Gulf Tb B8V Blvd ~ ~ )` ~Y~ .. .~'~~`' Page l of 1 C. ~,.. `~=1~1~ ~ t. :f~ - .~ - - 3Y t iRJI. ,~ r~s sc _ ~} } ~; lip ~' Q ~, _ : g i45~ I .., ' ' -. 33 r E ; -. "_u_ _ !!! „. ._ .' .. . ' - :.. ~ ~ 1 7 ; e l ~ ' e ~ 'ice"~ 2006 NiaoQuest. fnc.' 02t~C6,N~VTE+d ~-, ~: ~ ? ~ ;^_: Ali ri hts reserved. iJse Subject to LicenslCopyr~ht This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of us and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~U~ 14 Zoos PLANNING DEPAf~TIVIENT CITY OF CLEARW,~TER httu://www.ma»q uest. com/mapshnap. adp?searchtype=address&countiy=U S &addtohi story... 4/24/2006 o~~ tE: 1' • 2C I ' ~~ ~~3ppEe~~,, 'ni8i5OdlC'KAL FG'~. ptP CGEicUG6i~0 ME~AI GirE T+"" i7% GF ~rN4~ r F Oi,rFV, ,;, 'J ~J rIEC G:/U Uttu~CnOFG'JIJf. ulliU ilE: ffE PI~I, SEC t!';Gn F.LECF iiG!J EL . cyA i10N P08 r~iA~ OF cc CPJ'i i'IL sac rcruror ccu~MEn~cs4Cai 0 C:;N~!JI: ~ ~~ ~u~F rg~ EC I6P 4G( 1 J9( '! f I J M:iLI IhD I ;;.( tiE ~6*, C I FFI. , U~.}. FLV 1'I'L ~, - F9JNV7 IlRCHCo Ikak' f'PI_ 4 `i CC\~G`F iE NCNtl6'[h: , f') e"~. C'_9dG CCWGi'.E iL I!•CWUN~EN Y:~r IQ I ,:I;d ' "r 1 tpr F{iIF' -1YI ~ I M1)f, 'l' r'i Fr I I, ` L ~r :'~~7 4L31dRJrR, i hFrL%ci:WCE M~GRUMENi p I ~ :: f1SLB kF!CPi, IiR " + Irr1 ,:~ f IAF FG!E-C I ~ rvFC ; If ~ I L( ~II ,F '.Li UF.iIL'N r ) rL I ~~ Ad + L P11, - 1.fi~. li',li,r cry.L _ u ~E ~ Y 51t ~ YhSf _ I(11i F VTn ~l d~. Jn4 'n eC6 :,.v.~, V.II tdVI ~;,nY~SrYfc., 7J,IJJ'iOIC LIGk'~' G;;l,ud µ67d11GLl. = .;1-iE~ .J,I. ?Ek ,~.,%n V6L4~ IS 1~ i' ~ G '.G~I~, r.J: ~~a3aRESa016 n~~~ a the Lawl ~~' 601e OI[ Wl ff ROW. M: ;.~;-~ ~=;~; --,I ~~ I ~, ,:~~~ L.___-_._.__ ....__. !^ ,~ ~. !. ~ i «~. w,~.,:; ~ .. . ,., i r:. I I --_.---- ----- ---.--- '--'_.-- ----- -- I I _.__._....____.____.. ~~,~;,:,, I t' ~~~~Y cJ a,^ln~; I \ iC l,`;::Vi R; i f-tivr i./E~~~i ~~~~~ I ~t;'2.,~,A.l ~ i~ CGIdL'. CL'Ei Cli ~_ ___~~_ EO PJ6HT-OF-Jff;Y r- .. .,- -- ..y:, . Iw,a~ NR/11rI r__ ~Srv' '~^ ~ i P! ~ l+i, ~W.'3..' F, '11'~, I ~ IIKP08® _ I I, AI II I r l l _ I Z ~7 :. ~~~ i. '~ ~ I Aos 24' a1. ~ ` t I ~ ~ I Ir ~ I + I ma NIEr _: ~. 9° I ~ Nv:mi~assill I I ~ :. ~ ~• A 1 I ~ ~ -~..4 ~ , -• 1~I I aAUERY so-T1o a1AX6Dts K 1 ~ J / ' (m aoreaa x s NoFS FnN I / ~` } 17-0" ~+ .- A WTAL ff b RINHAS) 9 , ~ ~ °° u, a Ir. I ~' ~ mxsNUCr rroE •e• - I /- ~ ~ N"Jt ~ EIfT PEA fOOi Fy 'slF.ffts raEAirvasz3~ I j A04 N W ~~'' '~ N-12 CP1C • E C I A ~„~ [a,E I aAIE Ea 31N ' L Nk 3AN ~ x~ /, fit, ~ y ~ Q A05 31' Oll f 1 1 I ~ ~ ~k ORa A80E i TOP FY 7660 r1 PMO ~ I ~'~ Z w„> I ~ Qy.(~," i Nr 6110 F i/6'Pm R ON1J ,~ I'~ ~, i j y C t '. [ NM. a.S0. ~` I 1 :9M. awo1N~!'iF~ T6aotio) - i'~'w (~ I ~ W~ ~) ~ ) 4aE'--lNOCa~tiiilrwt-"~ - I r.F~ i ~ V' ExRmeo r. ~ ,~I,~I~I ~~ ~ ~" ~ , uloonhDlDUU S1a017EW ~ 1 r ! _~! i I O a - a~leAa p16P NIET ! j G _ ,, ~ ~I. ~ i cv' -~ ORATE f1: 5162 ~ '7I. I I X4 rr', sNU.svo ~ ~11G E NY. StSD ! ~~~ ~ I 1 i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ j 1 ~ 1 ~ - ,b g ~I~ i ( i I I !~ e ' a ? 11s.a1rllns~ ~ ~ ~ I I d/' X-12 a1C • 6007[ t~ !!! ,~ a I -- ', 1 ' 9 I I/ ~ ~ _~ _ ~ ,~. 1 ;~ , ,I I ~ I -- - n u. ff IrI Aos. - I i ~ I _ X-12 ale • aegt ~ I ~ ~ e~t~ Se7 c Bbd 1 1.1 "` 9{ - -p~tdsn6D7 T+vE t" i ~ 6 Nr. sieo ~~I ,d~ / {_ ~*Y Eo i 2~n~~ I A~~I 7ert Ea s3ao E `1' 6 EM. 61m I g , Dena E1: e6m • ~ I ~ ~.-~~ ~ Ne NY. 626 ISM I I ! I IM Sin EI" A 1'°7 I 11 3 V. a 12•I /DS • a A ,r~i I III IZ a1c 0 I I ~ ,iJ ~ u. 1 I I ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1If -I;na-n l ~N RAR . ~.~ 88P12'091M106.6T0'1 .~~ _.. ~ ..„ ~'~'~- v '7 - ... _- si \ . , I~ ~ ~-_- _ el < 4.. --.__ -F7- .,, .... ~. ADS 2f Ok A00 11mD1 GRIN lAF. ~ ' aeeTE a au RE NY. 5276 >. SE EM. 63q G1AF TO BAY BLVD. '41 c,Vr hd% 1lN1~ V.: E ;. FI GF v,~A' (AL V1,Y« iK I 1F f~L ~ ~ rt(,~. T Fti1_~. FF ~J.,~ L ~~/ it ! L E'f I'E I,f' I '. F I lip lGF_ n ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. 8RE DATA 10TK 91E /JF.E' {1,93712 S03T. OR 691 A0R6 MAL 1DTK IPFAIlOS NiEA: 13,310.01 l6iT. 011 70.12e a RIE TOTAL PFANaf6 AAFk 10.32111 SOFT. Olt 43.70% a SIIF SOTAL~lR A~~Q N,-S1Y! soFT. a oae eau ELu I100R AAfAtp-SIOII' Ni6NOl 4,100.00 sOit ON nm a SLIE 1RA91 f71O0fIPE 116W 90JT. a5 6761 ff SITE mTx 9FOn1aIS IpfA: 20.1I1.1o saPS. OR eTm9 a stE rorAL rmlas FnrA la{6I Is saPr. aR alu ff srt lfl1COlAR Ilg APFI. 14,36{.10 SOFT. 09 30.01% ff p1E 6MtltRR (IMY 69E4 OR SETAAON aNTAp ro FRLIa7 SLTAININ a NS9EOR AaFFrtrc. smEDC slam s07mS ND TN10N60S N /mI110q aXm/CON sllL NAEE Simi, uAal. 6A 7D1m S1aA61E mmA6l a o6aulo N AAFA9 NEPF C.falAtlalll Imam ADFFIC e m aOFA IFO Eai SAF. F. N OE ONION a nE oaIETA ND/aI LOfM. NmpN7RS, oE6sRE auv6Dl5 a FAAn1 ee 1NF@aOm OIF-srt D6EA m 1lIRK/1 o6vtAOC as m X91C111M mV61C. TIE (LN71yCiR 010 RFIayE MD GFlN SID mROI N TNC SAIEF/CfION a AE Qtl1IEFA NONR /lA1tlIIlEl A FLiEA call 9WE 6[ nltm a A1E 90F9 AID 60aDIl a M UIDfl109016D 1ANL EOOLAROM YAM A Ie11Ml { f00I W a iNE TOP. ^E11 IRNO PTAQOf161O911 CffameroR 91WL PROd( OD9F0E AT TIE BAac a 9u0ID 6Y 91aN0 aAOE D tf ro 2L iNE OoxllncOR wsT xo1FY nE ONAIEm a l6carD IIO aamaa I6nIIDRns. b IIOUR9 N /aN10S ro amAN A OP,rAAOE Imm,Te6 nE oPxlAa smEEI wm BE NsPaSm PeOR m mac RIND wATe~ ou,~m cal.cu.AT~s PEe 61FAXO aETEmt I/Y 91m 91E slE wsr K AETA9m f011 amt aum FAE-OEAADR. 90: 1PEA • OM AC O/2'Xaaa)A2 - aow AaR. OA 1,7M an AFaAMD FOR PAF-iAGi1eNT PPE-OtEAm7Nf PRO1Om: 0.016 M R. SIPoICAEE SADCAAE Ta flEl 60TIa1 E7M. O~1N 7 MNBm OkRNP0a1 A' Y C SQE 91191T ORtL' s-1 ~ ~ enu su3 n1r u' xas s S-2 ~ ~ 566D 3630 637 1 0. EIC 6/.fi 4 5-3 ~ 111E~T 57,65 620.5 517 IY SIN E N rITE'7 FEES xa N.SO 1212' Is St3o ~ S-S ~ N ~ S73T S66D T OY p IIE T . 1S S2S0 E Ir ssn xF s-6 TxE'C° IIEt 3600 N.n 67C IY 526 SN s7 ~ N ~ 5142 ban 4Ie Ir ssn FE a61c.9oE Ir ss4: sw 7-C s F4 ^It m'~ 3-0 y~,,a 60.50 ea3o 0.07 Ir 1r S23o SSao M s coo, sca4o clw~s aAUen wo~OON n2YA1XN 7T.) Ne wulE (OA R) IwAA wuE (W RI ArAAL wale (AC R.) enroll Na0 aN am aao u. 6iD 376 370 a0D 1p01 e'er mm a1 w oma 6100 Ne I]N 0611 e #1~ aw eI a'ne aox 1H111 ~ N.01 Ia SAI_ _.0071. ORIGINAL RECENED J~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DElar~~; ~u1~:3~! CITY OF CLE:~IRY~,A~Tkk ~~ SANITARY STRUCTURE M ELEVATION INVr7tT 1YPE 5f-1 59.26 RCP N WV•57.0 8" RCP 5 INV•57.22' MANHOLE MANHOLE ST-2 58.85 BOTTOM•57.35' INLET ST-3 58.99 BOTTOM•57.59' FLIET ST-4 54.52 BOTi0M•5202' RB INLET Ai REAL ESTATE CONSTRUC710~N DEPARTMENT 2100 W. CYPRESS CREEK ROAD fORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309 (954) 940-5264 OMMERCIAL E14:LOPMENT OLUTiONSJNC. HILUAM Y. HARRELL, P.E 1234 EAST UME SiREET SU11E B LAKELAND, FLORIDA 33601 PHONE: 863-802-1500 fAX: 863-802-1505 eEUAX Y. xARE1L PE FL PL X0. 7179 all 1498 QUF TO BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLOFDA 6009 r.. ~,. D1P .»~: NEa® BC IOOIDa00 R1 A i~ t~ADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN tltfllL~ C-4 F ACCF3'TABLF F~L MATE~tlALS wuva uew omrr Ytl ~ m i m rm o w RIY Ir W ~ f 4A rIA ~ W ~I ~ ~ . WOt 14P4 wrP4 wf4 FOIL q r W® 1 ~ ~ r it IIIlO81f x A IO wIK Mi N1M~001 ~ wAr rar Dir ' m,4 w mrw+NrunmAwrr r .An,4w wx wrs Yr)a UMrDwwAi4p °1~W/1W d'O' r 1IN4n~116 A s. 0,4D. { L ws Ad Iitlaw Atlea mmr.IOla tlYl'an414irtr Am® UC1tlIGt NIf 10 PI11 > ~ ~. 1W0 ~ Rr o d wren ID[ wAm MYIM mtl IM 3 ~ { ~ urloN romlr anAUw rrt aurtl xwamsrNmo rrri smtlA 111 4 n r[ fA awtlr wrl Atl4M Dtltl nl v rrm AA. ~t 41~ Wl~ AA[61PICt a Atll A ~ ~ r mle4o nncia mm ~ IIFA£ NILE: 11E nSAU AA91i0 OESNIDYIIS ARF Ftlt CRAOAA76 OILY. AE SEIE 14gf AL9D 8E FIA91[0 CIIUlPD ANOYAA fOA EYAIa7E AE SIOIE YUSf E SPECFEO AS IrVAO~ CIAI9PD, /NOIILM NS /SIDE a~Ta ENO sFTaauYax--~ .~. y.,~ m nee aSm mp ouAtlu Dev. aero ~aID~ EY. flee Sago mmr eee st.m '7 srrr DEV. Iaao ENSYYD SUTNIItY C ~~ FOR SlptlfiEGt IIPOIOIAAOI CALL I-aBB-tiR-7l9{ ' SFE SWfefEOfS OESIOI YAMYL YANIAI. YU' NSTYIFD A B A B v/~ u e6TTRE 1W UD ~~~ srry(tl~ ~~ x x~irstAUlOw~ix1 MA' z JaC : ls.+' ,,~. >' CNAIYfl1 SIOIIADE 1S9 CUNC FEET, 1f,e Law! ~ ~ NSIAYFD srorwE ~ FFET __ ~ NIC AI 3 3 ~~, r-t ~~ r-o' r-r . r-r e• b i b _ -- " __ _ ~ ~ i N I >r i ~% I ~ b NEEIIAN IR-I7P3 PAAYE t SOLD C0~ ~aAR a YD~/D-~ ~ aF Yx) fi aws Y 0.C- AaaAO Yx IErn GR /EEml4 - aaFID N41PD m snaDAAE oWA PPE oPENxo la' ACA {' AA9m ROnf N f4iFR rABRC FARE 4 90ID a.« PLAN ~,~ puTE IRAIRO ffAW1O ROX OWff I'd Y-O' I'd 4'-4' C 1 E .~. / ~ ~ f } E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ I l % ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~~ I' - - - ~ - ~ _~ ~ R 7-Y W Y-f W ~ Inns Itls HOPE rff m sIaNIEnI awmr Nv. Paao DEAR m9 ;~~ NY. azsP ~ tl It ac ~OIN rqn -µnP0.C /OiN AAY3 SAINIEW WDED! 14iATYt mE MAI~lBdANCE NOTES (ISOLATOR RO THE ISOLATOR ROW IS AN EFFECnVE, LOW COST SYSIEY TO TRAP SEDIMENT IN STORM WA1ER MID PROVIDE EASY ACCESS FOR MNNTENMICE THE ISOLATOR ROW IS A ROW OF STORYIECEI CNAA~ERS THAT IS COIWLETELY SURROUNDED YNH FlL1ER FABRIC AND DIRECTLY CONVECTED TO AN UPSTREAM MANHOLE FOR EASY ACCESS THE FABPoC WRAPPED CHAMBERS PROVIDE FIXt SETTLING AND FlLTRAIION aF SEDIMENT AS STORM WATER Rl~S IN 1HE ISIXATOR ROW AND ULIINATD,Y PASSES 11iR0UGH THE FLIER FABPoC tEAWNG llff SEDIMENT BEHI~. THE ISOLATOR ROW PRONOES HWTi LEVELS OF 1OTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS REYOVAL AND PROTECTS THE STORAGE AREAS OF THE ADJACENT CHAN~RS AND STONE FRpA SEDMENT DEPDSInaN. SEDMENT ACCUMUUnON N iNE ISOUTOR ROW IS MONITORED niRWGN INSPECnON PORTS.MID MANTENANCE IS CONDUCTED WriFN THE SEDIMENT OEPni REACHES APPRO)OMAIELY 3 INCHES A LARGE DIAMETER PIPE PRONDES ACCESS FRgA THE MANHOLE TO 1HE ISOLATOR ROW. YHEti MAINTENANCE IS NE(DEO, THE ENTIRE ROW CAN BE ~ETiFD CiFAN, FdtgNG SEDIMENT BACK Td 111E ACCESS MANHOLE YNERf IT IS REMOVID BY YACTORINC. S azro P S PLAN YIEW I. GUwrn YAIERALS SHALL CCIP'OPII ro ASIY Asia GRADE ~o-w-os. 2 YATBOAL• g1CTAE RON. S PLANT: CASINGS ARE FURrALV W1H A BUCK PAWT. 1. APPACX DRAW AREA . taA.W SD aL S APPACX'IFIgIT . a0.ED tB3. 'A' TYP. AD8 NYLOPLA8T CATCH BABW NOT ib acuE REAL~ESraTE CONSTRUCnON DEPARTMENT F R WL~AUDE~RDALE~FLEK33309 (954) 940-5284 OMMERI;IAL E4E10PMENT ORIGINAL aunaNS,iNC. RECEIVED WILLIAM Y. HARRELL, P.E. UL 14 2006 1234 EAST LIME STREET ', SUITE 8 LAKELANO, FLORIDA 33801 WING DEPARPMEN PHONE: 663-802-1500 ~ ~ OF CL~ARWAiER FAX: 863-802-1505 ~ AW W Y. NANEIl. PE ft PE N0. 7f7P CINl 2496 QU.F TO BAY BLVD CLEAFtWATEA, RORDA T~S.981D7Ya6; 6009 As sNOxN a0T - An e ~ DIP ~' DRAINA(~ DETAILS C-4.2 I fdi STOINIECII rFpalA7ATN CALL I-BaB-M2-ffiBI SXFf C-A iTA tlAECAON V PPES, wMw iQYiO eAb 1 a ¢ b frON®t uM SIE, NYAT REYAlld15 i O V1H 6 ~ onu. Vartl wAAlt altll ^ ~ uraRr tl S~~ 17 VII AN10tlPIL'6, MDM Central Florida 501 West Peachtree Slreef Lakeland, FL 33815 863/646-9130 863/648-1106 FAX MDM South Ftorida 1412 SW 34th Ave. Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 954/427.3076 954/427.3420 FAX ~ MDM Atlanta 921 Faulkner Lane ' Ball Ground, GA 30107 7701345-3960 770/345-3961 FAX Engineering and Environmental March 24, 2006 Sandra Owens Conn~~ercia.l Development Solutions, lnc. 1234 East Lime Street, Suite B Lakeland, Florida 33801-5785 Geotecunical Investigation Bank Atlantic 248 Gulf to Bay Blvd Clearwater, Florida MDM Project #220 i 5 On March 14, 2006, one double ring infiltrometer (DRT1) was conducted to evaluate the soil drainage characteristics. In addition, three standard penetration tests (SPT-1 through SPT-3) were conducted in general accordance with ASTM Standard Di586 at the locations depicted on the proposed facility Site Plan (Figure 2, Appendix A)- The site location is depicted on Figure 1 (Appendix A). Hand angering was performed. to 5 ft. in depth at each location as a means of protecting potential underground utilities. No utilities or obstructions were encountered. Field logs of each standard penetration test and the double ring infiltrometer results are compiled in Appendix B. All depths as referenced are below the existing grade on the date of testing. On the date of testing, the site was an abandoned gas station. Figure 3 (Appendix A) is an aerial photograph from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS, depicting soil around the site area. Based on the aerial, urban land covers the site. Based on the sandy soils encountered at the borings and results of the double ring uifiltrometer (12.26 in/hr), the soils at the site should be considered Hydrologic Group B. From review of the three standard penetration test logs (Appendix B), the following is a summary of the site lthology to 14 feet below ground level: De th feet below round level Litholo is Descri Lion Surface to 14 ft. Sand, pale brown to dark~}~~~, fine grained, Unified Soil Classificati4~~/ED ~~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEFA~"f iVl<=-'~~. CITY OF CLEAl2VVt?TIn~ ' • Civil Engineering • Building Design • Permitting • Geotechnicai • Environmental Assessments, Fiemediation • Construction Management Bank Ailaniic- MI~M Job #122015 Page 2 Based on the characteristics of the site lithology, adequate support for this proposed Bank Atlantic development will be provided. The following recommendations for site development are proposed: ORIGINAL RECEIVED SITE PREPARATION ,~lV,I~ 1 4 200 • Surficial asphalt should be stripped/removed from the proposed building area; and ,~ extend a minimum. distance of 5 ft. in all directions from this area. The subgrade below the asphalt layer can remain. • The proposed building area, and 5 ft. perimeter beyond. this area, should be proof compacted with the use of a minimum 10 ton vibratory roller. The proposed. retention pond area should not be compacted. • Compaction tests should be performed at 1 ft. vertical intervals to a minimum depth of 4 ft. below the proposed building foundation depth. Based on the proposed building size (approx. 4,500 fiz), at least 2 compaction test locations, spaced at least 30 ft. apart, are recommended. For compaction testing, the Modified Proctor test should be performed. A minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density is required to a depth of 4 feet below the base of the proposed building foundation. Although not encountered in more than trace amounts during the geotechnical investigation, organic soils, if encountered during site construction, should also be stripped from this area. Such stripping should be extended a minimum of 5 feet beyond the proposed store building area if adequate compaction is not achieved based on the Modified Proctor test results, the material should be excavated/undercut and placed back in lifts of maximum 6 inches for re-compaction. • Imported fill material, if required during site construction, should preferably consist of fine grained quartz sand with less than 5% organic fines. The fill should be placed ui lifts not exceeding 6 inches and compacted until a inimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density is achieved to a depth of 4 feet below the base of the proposed store building foundation. BUILDING FOUNDATION • The building foundation should be installed at least 1.5 feet below the proposed finish grade of the site. • The building foundation should be supported either on conventional shallow spread footings or a monolithic slab with thickened edges to serve as wall support footings. The foundation footings should be sized to exert a maxunum pressure of 2500 psf on the compacted native sand material or structural fill. Provided the proposed building area of the site, including the recommended 5 ft. perimeter beyond this area, is properly compacted as confirmed by Modified Proctor testing per the above recommendations, the building foundation will be adequately supported for this recommended maximum pressure. Footings should be of Bank A#iantic MDM Sob #22015 Page 3 minimum 16 inch width. As hand augering was required to 5 ft. below ground level at each SPT location in order to clear potential underground utilities, the soil bearing capacity of this interval could nat be determined by standard penetration testing. Based. on "N" values (i.e. blow counts per foot of depth) below 5 ft., the bearing capacity of soils at locations is less than 700 psf. Because the sands on-site were very loose (bearing capacity of 700 psf or less}, it is recommended that sands from ground surface to 5 feet in depth are excavated from any proposed building footprint and at least 5 feet around the building footprint and replaced in lifts not exceeding 6 inches and compacted until a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density is achieved. Compaction tests should be performed every 2500 ft2 per foot of depth in any proposed building areas. Visqueen of minimum 6 mil thickness, or equivalent vapor retarding material, should be placed beneath the building floor slab as a means of retarding moisture and subsurface vapors. Stormwater drainage features should be placed as far as possible from the proposed building foundation. The minimum recommended distance for such drainage features from the building foundation is 20 feet. PAVENJ(ENT AREAS Paved areas should have a stabilised subgrade of at least 1 fl inches. The base course above the subgrade should be a minimum thickness of 6 inches, following compaction. Based on availability in the site area, crushed himerock is the recommended base course (if asphaltic concrete is the finished surface course) and should be compacted in maximum 6 inch lifts. The surface course of paved areas is recommended to be asphaltic concrete and have a minimum stability of 1500 pounds. The recommended minmum thickness of the surface course (finished asphalt) is l .5 inches. Commercial mix concrete of minimum 3000 psi load bearing capacity may be substituted for asphaltic concrete as the surface course. The ~ninivnum recommended slab thickness is 5 inches. Welded wire mesh should be set approximately within the slab center during concrete pouring. Compacted sand may be substituted for the base course if concrete is chosen as the surface course. INFU.TRATION TESTING One double ring infiltration test (DRTh) was performed in accordance with ASTM Standard D3385 at the location. depicted in Figure 1 (Appendix A). The test results are compiled in Appendix B. As indicated, the approximate vertical infiltration rate was determined to be 12.26 in/hr. The water table was encountered at 9 feet below ground surface during this investigation. Based on water table measurements conducted during Envirotrac previous site assessment, the seasonal high water table is estimated to occur at 7.5 feet below ground surface. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~u~..1 ~ zoas PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEgRWATER Banl: Atlantic MDM Job #122015 Page 4 Prepared By: Date: ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~J~ 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIIY OF CLEARWATER APPENDIX A ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MDM Services, Inc. I Y -- - - - i ~ I m ~, o "' -- --- ~Eli~-abE ~ - -~ ~ - t . _ - . I >~ ~. ~ ~ I - °~ ~ _~ ~-___~ __ ~1~3TI1: 17i i~ 1 ;ft7l;y~DtTlJayTE~'LfJ ~__ - i m ~ 1II i I ~I ~' I~ ~I -i I-- 1 - Ate. io ~- ~- ~--n~- ~ -~'-~ ~ s i .. - -~ ~ r - -- i I i~ ~~~A~ "~JAR791AEg i i!! j i- -' m ~i'~', m! Qfl., i b a ny pnonnauid ~ i ~ ,. c d " i ' a~~ioo,aa7d?Yil' I l I~ - _ a~;aoo~~i6e ~ .~,_.. w t ;_ ~ 1 -- -':~ ~ o i j ~ :J ~° 'a, i o , ,d ,~ ,~ ..-.: Im pia to ~, _. ~..P?3 ~i34~.J?B JiI._. .-- .. S-..HaJcher~3ii~-]~,i _.--.~ ~' Cn ; I I - ,,: ,~ I , , i -- - ;r, --- ---- , .:, v~-~Aair~-eve - ~~rn ~~ ,I ~ - m I; m ~j - Q ~ ' i' o:., I -. ~ , --. d' ~ _ I ly~.l.~_ - --.: ._ r I - - . - _ _-- -, ,~~. - _ I ~ ~~ ° cn Irn. I i ---- ... -~g ~s.Bxlf_g ~ c'. I .c t I - --- t- I i, --ry 'ter 4n :.. ~ ~ . _ . ~ r _ -~ --- -- ------ i' ,- -- ~ ~---- J I .~ °•. 1 ;d ~~~ ate. "-ti - --- .: - -. ~_ ----_ ~~ -::..:.:.-_. tip- i ~~. ~ F+?~ js ', i I :i i=Ftiishiny~v -- o i ~ j o ..:_ I I ~~ I . ~ --- - . --- II j: j , i~ i ~ j~ ~ I 'I ; ~i z I _~ ~~ .'~ i .o I ~~: -1S `FEE ~ } i ~ ~ o , i ' r~ ~ I ~_ 1 ~~ I '1'. .-...-_____ ._. ~ j __.. __ .. ..-_ ._..... ~.` .. _ i.. ~~ 3S .??uZ3S.~??E ~ ~ ~ 'rn j m ~ ; '7fSa St i t`~ >;' ~; ~ e 0 Z ~-- 0 ~ N O N U ~ O O ~ J ~ ~ ~_ ~ }cc ~ ~ C _U C ~ (6 to m ~, :a Q T ~ o` to ~ - ~m o~ tU O U ~ ~ ~ N ~ t~ ~ w ~ a o~i ~ cu o ~t U ~ ~ . ~ V = z °' *'y c r~ o V ~ ~ ~ a W a> ~ ~l N m JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LEGEND -~- STANDARD PENETRATION SPT1 TEST LOCATION Q DOUBLE RING INFIL7ROME7ER DRI 1 TEST LOCATION C1 ~ ~Z ~ O Z ~ r-- H m ~ r v D~ m _~ ~'~ ~ N ~O ~ r -'" D7 ~~ ~. MDM JOB No. a""s mcnAn6ro or: uue r . so•-o' o"r[: s/n/as ~~~~ z2o, 5 lull D I VI OF"qN Bn Dtw ~oP~ ~ ~,oES a.: ~1 tlantic ~ aco2o en 5.5. 3498 GULF i0 BAY BLW. CLEARWATER FLDRIDA 50 0' 25' S0 Services, inc. ^°^~°'~ a^ FIGURE NO. [NCINEfRINC d CNYIRONMCNIAL pROPOSED~ SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 " - 50' - 0" 2 ,.,. ~, s>~ „~2,e„-«~ f~~l e,<-aiw NORTH GULF 70 BAY BLVD. (S,R. 60) -v n~ O~ r Q ~*+ m Y~ D ~~ ~~ rn m ~ ~ ~O m <D v~ MDM SERVICES, INC. Proposed Bank Atlantic Soif Survey Engineering and Environmental 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd Figure 3 Lakeland, Florida Pinellas County MDM Job# 22015 North Clearwater, Florida APPENDIX B ORIGINAL RECEIVED J~JL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPAi~tti/~~,':~~ CIN OF CLEARV~l,'~tI:R MDM Services, Inc. DQtJ~3LE R~[~G ~4~FlLTl~C)C~ETE~ Bank Atlantic PROJECT I.' 22015/1040 \\~ATER TABLE(\\~T) : >5 ft 2498 Gulf to Bay Bh~d \\~EATHER: 80 DEG/ sunny TEST DEPTH: 0.5'BGS naTr--.- ;na/n~ IN1\ER RI NG ANitULAR SPACE BET\~1~EE1\ RINGS ELAPSED TIME/MINs 14~ATER QUAN (Cu In) INT'1L. RATE (]i~/Hr) \\~ATER QUAN (Cu In) 1NPlL. RATE (In/Hr) 1 S 475.86 16.84 954.03 l 2.64 30 390.39 ] 3.81 9l 0.14 12.05 45 346.50 12.26 995.b 1 ] 3.19 60 346.50 12.26 910.14 12.05 75 346.50 12.26 910.14 12.05 9U 346.50 12.26 910. ] 4 12.05 105 346.50 12.26 910.14 12.05 12U 346.50 ] 2.26 910.14 12.05 INFILTRATION RATE VERSUS TIMEaDRT1 20.00 18.00 16.00 14.00 _° 12.00 a~ ~ 10.00 c ~ 8.00 Q >Y 6.00 4.00 2.00 0 00 `\ .~ i ~.~ o -®-INNER INFILTRATION RATE m OUTER INFILTRATION RATE 0 50 100 150 ELAPSED TIME (Minutes) APPROXIMATE VERTICAL 11~TPILTRATION RATE: 12.2G IN/}-iR ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 14 2000 PLANNING DEPAi~'INiENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP 8 . n 0 N N o O m m ' a MDM Services, !NC LOG OF BORING SPT-1 Environmental and Engineering Lakeland, FL Bank Atlantic Date Completed :3/14/06 2498 Gulf to Bay Bivd Total Depth : 14 ft. Clearwater, FL Drilling Method :Split Spoon-ASTM 1586 Drilling Company : Vortek Environmental Drilling MDM Project #22015/1040 Sampler Type ® Hand Auger ® Split Spoon Depth i ~ ~ ~ c o U ~ a n ~ t=act ~ ~ m DESCRIPTION 0 SANb, dark brown, fine grained 1 HA SP :':" 2 SAND, pale brown, fine grained 3 HA SP 4 5 2 SAND, dark brown, fine grained 2 fi 2 SP ': 3 7 z 2 $ s SAND, brown, fine grained SP ': 2 9 10 2 SAND, brown, fine grained SP ; ~ 2 11 3 SAND, pale brown, fine grained ORIGINAL s RECEIVED 12 2 II~J~ 14 2006 ~ `'~. . 13 4 PLANNING C)EPH12tn~lE:t~d3 2 CIN OF CLEARW,'~'C~I~ 4 14 MDM Services, INC Environmental and Engineering Lakeland, FL Bank Atlantic 2498 Gutf to Bay Blvd Clearwater, FL MDM Project #22015/1040 Sampler Type ® Hand Auger ® Split Spoon j c Depth ~ ~ U in ~ n 3 Feet ~ ~ m 0 LOG OF BORING SPT-2 Date Completed :3/14/06 Total Depth : 14 ft. Drilling Method :Split Spoon- ASTM 1566 Drilling Company : Vortek Environmental Drilling DESCRIPTION SAND, dark brown, fine grained U cn a U ~ c~ 1-I l Y it I HA I I SP SAND, pale brown, fine grained HA SP 5 2 SAND, dark brown, fine grained 2 6 i SP 2 7 2 $ s SAND, brown, fine grained SP 2 9 10 n s 2 SAND, brown, fine grained 0 2 SP i 1 s SAND, pale brown, fine grained ORIGINAL ;; 2 RECEIVED 12 m 2 14 2006 t o s ~ ~~.. SP 13 PLANNING DEFARTCv`i~IJT 0 N 4 CITY OF CLEARW,4TE€~ ~, ° 14 2 s a !? N 0 N O D O m L t m MDM Services, INC LOG OF BORING SPT-3 Environmental and Engineering Lakeland, FL Bank Atlantic Date Completed : 3114/D6 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd Total Depth : 14 ft. Clearwater, FL Drilling Method :Split Spoon-ASTM 1586 Drilling Company : Vortek Environmental Drilling MDM Project #22015/1040 Sampler Type ® Hand Auger ® Split Spoon Depth > ~ m u j U ~ U ~ in Feet iD 3 ~ 3 in DESCRIPTION U ~ Q ~ 0 SAND, brown, fine grained i HA Sp :~_. 2 SAND, pale brown, fine grained 3 HA SP '' 4 5 1 SAND, dark brown, fine grained 2 s sP 1 2 ~ 1 SAND, brown, fine grained 2 ~ 8 SP :. 1 3 9 10 SAND, pale brown, fine grained woh 11 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 •.. •', ~UL 1 ~ 2006 '~.. 12 SP 1 PLANNING DEPARTivIE!v+ 13 2 CIN OF CLEARW,"~TEF` 3 1 14 ~~ ~q~~q~gi ~~iV L Ji`~6dYf~y tlJ t. December 18; 2006 Mr. John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department Muiucipal Services Building 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clear«~ater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006-07043 - 2498 Oulf to Bay Blvd CDS # 6009 Dear Mr. Schodtler, 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803 Phone: 863-802-1500 Fax: 863-802-1505 We have reviewed and addressed your comments dated December 4, 2006, and final comments received December 6, 2006 via email. Listed belo«~ are our written responses to each of the comments given in order to perform a fatal review of this project. Fire Comments 1. Comment: Provide aru~'show on the plan minimum 30' turning radtus_for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO D.O. Response: Refer to the added Fire 't'ruck Path Plan (FP-1), we routed the truck through the site using a minimum 30'-0" turning radius. Landscape Comments 1. Comment: 11 /13,06 Revise Landscape Plan L-1 to slsow sight visibility Mangles at the corners of Old Coad~man Road 8. Gul{to Bay Blvd. and Old Coachman Road ce Shelley Street. Note that no landscaping or structures shall exceed 30 inches in height within these sight visibility triangles. 7/31/06 Application Section H, Landscape Plan submittal Requirements, states that the landscape plan (i. e. sheet LP-101) shall include: Site Visibility Triangles. t Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 and the Landscape Plan; sheet L-1 for the added sight triangle at the intersections of Onlf to Bay and Old Coachman Road and Shelly Street and Old Coachman Road. As per instructions of City staff, the identification sign was required to be located 5'-0" from each right of way line as shown an our plans. T'he sign is proposed as a double pole sign with clear open area to a height of 7'-6" to the bottom of the sign offering a view thru the sight triangle area. 2. Comment: 11/13/06 The Live Oaks and. Magnolias proposed in the western five foot perimeter landscape buffer seem to be a poor choice. 1) They are going to create problems for vehicular traffic on both the subject and neighboring sites. 2) Their root systems are notorious for lifting asphalt, especially when placed in narrow landscape beds. Perlucps placing accent trees along this buffer would be a better idea (2 accent h•ees = i shade tree). 7/31/06 Tferify and explain how the proposed landscaping and trees are going to coexist with the landscaping and h•ees of the adjacent property. Response: Refer to the revised Landscape plan; sheet L-1 for listed changes: (3) Live l3aks and (2) 1Vlagnolias have been replaced with (ZO) accent trees. Comore»t: Revise page L-1. The quantities on the materials list table do not snatch the quanitites labeled on the landscape plan. (1) two " 11 "are not labeled near eastern entrance. (2) The "SP" label on the north end of tlae building indicates a quantity of five but tl~e plan shows six. (3) two "QYare not labeled in the eastern perimeter landscape buffer. (4) "IYS" list indicates 170 -plan shows 175. (S) `JC"list indicates 190 -plan show 219. (6) "VS" list indicates 231-plan shows 234. (7) "LM" list indicates 289 -plan shows 402. (8) ` I_11~Iir" list indicates 170 -plan shows 193. (9) "TA "list indicates 265 -plan shows 256, (10) "TJ" list indicates 210 -plan shows 245. Response: Refer to the Landscape plan; sheet L-1 for the revised materials List with the revised quantities. Land Resource Comments Comment: 11/13/06 Show the canopies of trees to be preserved. I still don 't like all o f tlae proposed activity under the trees, revise plan to show all cuts under the canopies shall be radial to the tree. Provide prior to building permit.. 8/14/06 Revise the Irrigation Plan to prevent trenching under the canopies of trees to be preserved prior to D.O. Response: We added the canopies of the trees to be preserved to all plan sheets. A Tree Preservation Plan (sheet L-2) was prepared by the Licensed Landscape Architect upon consulting his certified Licensed Arborist (Ilardeman Kempton & Associates were contracted by CDS, Inc. to perform these specific functions as the City requested during our meeting). Recommendations for preservation of the existing trees can be found on Sheet L-2, proposed cuts have been revised as requested. 2. Comment: 11/13/06 Show the actual limits of the t~•ee barricades and remove tlae root pruning note on the demolition plan. Revise prior to building permit. Response: Revised tree barricades to match the tree preservation plan and the recommendations of the Landscape Architect hired to prepare the tree preservation plan. Refer to sheet D-1 for revised barricades locations and to sheet L-2 for the tree preservation plan. 3. Comment: 8/14/06 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the, fceld of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i. e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data requzred on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual t. tree barricade limits (2/3 ofthe drip line and/or in the root prune lines ifrequired), and the tree barricade detail and any other pertine~at information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Response: The Tree Preservation Plan enclosed was prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect (consulting with his licensed arborist -Ted Kempton), the plan shows all building, par'ng, and drainage structures, proposed utilities do not impact the trees to be preserved. This plan shows the impact of the proposed development to the trees to be retained as wel! as recommendation for preservation to ensure survival of those trees. In addition, Tree barricade symbols have been adjusted on the tree preservation plan to pro~~ide protection up to 2/3 of the drip line. Te•affic Eng Comments 1. Comf~zent: Provide a 40' curb radius for ingress access along Gulf to Bay. Response: Refer to the revised Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the adjusted the curb radius from 3®' to 4Q' on the ingress side of the driveway. 2. Comment: Provide a right turn only sign and also replace through pave»aent arrow with a right turn arrow. Response: Refer to the Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the revised stop sign with added right turn only sign to and we replaced the through arrow with a turn arrow at the driveway at Gulf To Bay. Refer also to sheet C-6 for the Stop Sign detail. 3. Comment: Replace wheel stops with 4' high 6" dia. Concrete/metal bollards. Response: Per conversation with city staff, this comment is not a code requirement and we will maintain the concrete car stops. A note leas been added to paint the car stops "safety yellow" to help prevent hazards. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Z) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Applicability Criteria #1 1) Comment: 11/13/06 Your recent response did not demonstrate how tlae proposed bank building is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of the neighboring propert)~ (uniform city). The traffic concern has been addressed. Please attempt to address the increase to building height in your response about bulk or scale. Response: Upon receipt of these comments we made another site visit to view the surrounding business (businesses within walking distance of the proposed development). There are two new buildings within walking distance of this facility that may have my have undergone a Flexible Development Standard Review with regards to the height of the building and the setback of structures. The ferst one is the Iloliday Inn Express currently under construction which appears to be a four story building which is in excess of the 25'-Q" height requirement. The other building used in our comparison is the Wachovia Bank facility located at 2699 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Wachovia is a direct competitor of BankAtlantic's in this area. The Wachovia building appears to be approximately 35' tall to the peak of the roof and would have undergone the same Flexible Bevelopment Review to alleviate the 25' maximum height criteria. In addition, the Wachovia Building appears to be somewhat of a box with a triangle Iid on it. The towers on this building are BankAtlantic's signature Iook and do not make the building appear bulky because the top of the parapet wall is at 2t!'-1" then the top of the tower wall steps up approximately 7' to 27'-4" and the slope of the roof carries the peak up approximately 7' again to 34'-2 ll18" this dimension is the peak of the hip roof, the slope of this roof is graceful, and makes the tower balanced (architecturally pleasing). The graduation of height and the colors of the building create a welcoming feel, and tied the architectural elements together. The proposed height is consistent with other buildings within walking distance of this site. The colors are complimentary to the colors of other businesses within walking distance of this site (Walgreens, Wachovia, and the holiday Inn Express as examples). Therefore, we feel that BankAtlantic will be in harmony with other businesses in the area. With regard to Scale and Density, the bank building proposed is smaller than most of the comparable businesses in the area, however since the site is also small the floor area ratio and the total impervious area are in harmony with the surrounding properties. In this case this site will appear to have more landscaping and open space than most of the neighboring properties, therefore improving the appearance of this corner. l~Iost parcels immediate to this one appear to have much smaller landscape buffers and have not been redeveloped under the current guidelines; therefore, reduction of the structure setback here will help this site flow, visually, to the neighboring properties. General Applicability Criteria #5 Conz»zent: 11 /13/06 Your- response to General Applicabilih~ Criterion #, S has not been sufficie»tly addressed. The Code does not allow the proposed variations as you have indicated. You hcrve to justify the request to increase the building height above what is allowable by Code, which is 25 feet. You also have to justify the setback reductions for pavement. The allowable three front setbacks are 25 feet and remaining side setback is 10 feet. The landscape buffers do nol demonstrate compliance for pavement setbacks, especially when a reduction to the west side landscape buffer is a part of t1~e request. Response: Please refer to Criteria #1 for our response to the increased height and justifecation of the building height; we apologize for the misstatement previously submitted. We are requesting a reduction to the structure setback as permitted by the land development code under the Flexible Development Guidelines. The site is too small to accommodate the building, required drive isle widths with required parking stall depths and if the Bank is not permitted a review under the flexible development standards, they would not be able to construct this facility at this location. In fact, if staff had not suggested the Flexible Development Review at our pre-development meeting, we would have recommended that BankAtlantic pass on this site. BankAtlantic has 10 employees per shift and is open 7 days and therefore needs more parking to accommodate their employees as well as the public. Unencumbered traffic flow necessitates the drive isles, in the current locations. We are meeting the minimum required setback permitted under the flexible development standards on all sides of the property with only pavement intruding into the required 25' setback. 2. Comment: 8/23/06 Clarify. How are the increased building height and setback reductions to pavement consistent with tl~e community character of the immediate vicinity? Address separately. Response: As stated previously, the building height is consistent with other new businesses within walking distance of this site (Walgreen, Holiday Inn Express, Wachovia Bank). The property immediately adjacent to this parcel (and across the street) does not appear to have been developed under the current guidelines. The pavement setback appears to be much less than 15'. Therefore reduction of the pavement setback for this location will permit the BankAtlantic parcel to be in harmony with the adjacent property, keeping the curb lines somewhat consistent as you look down the street. F-Iowever, the BankAtlantic site will be much more pleasing to the eye and have more green area and landscaping than the parcels immediately adjacent to this site. Zoning Comments: 1. Comment: The parking counts as indicated its "Parking Provided " on page C-2 appear to be inconsistent with the proposed site plan. 11/13/06: The plan shows 21- 9 x 18 spaces and the table indicates 22 spaces. 7/31/06 The plan shows 19 - 9 x 19 spaces, 4 - 9 x 20 spaces, and 2 -12 x 20 HC spaces. Revise one or the other. Response: The parking data chart has been modified to snatch the plans (See C-2 for details.) 2. ComJnent.~ NOTE: TJ~e sign plans are inconsistent. The site plan shows the freestanding signs at 25 feet in height and t1~e freestanding sign elevation states 14 feet in height. The Site plan C-2 says one freestanding sign is 14 feet in height and the other 25 feet. No need to revise for this site plan approval. But the plans will need to be consistent for the CSP, building and sign permits. Response: Revised pole sign note on signage plan to 14 ft. high to match detail and site plan. 3. Comment: 11/13/06 Place the response (listed below) submitted on November 8, 2006 on the site plan and/or roof plan. 7/31/06 Depict on the site plan and/or roofplan the locations ofall mechanical equipment including a1c and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view of adjacent properties and rights-of--way. Response: Refer to the Site Plan; sheet C-2 for the added mechanical equipment screening note stating to refer to the building plans and sections for all required details. Please contact me as soon as possible if our responses to the "Criteria Comments" are unacceptable. RankAtlantic has a construction start date of February 1, 2~7 for this location and I would like to provide the City with responses that are acceptable without another plan submission if possible. Res ectfully subnutted; Cl~~ ,/L~ Nora an D. Grinst ad Senior Project Manager Map Output 2498 GTB httpa/publicgis.myclearwater.com/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=OVMap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False Page 1 of 1 7/31/2006 ,,. .._ TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BANK ATLANTIC AT GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD AND OLD COACHMAN ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared for: Commercial Development Solutions 1234 East Lime Street, Suite B Lakeland, Florida 33801-57885 Prepared by: Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants P. O. Box 941556 Maitland, Florida 32794-1556 407-423-8055 3uly 2006 LTEC N_~ 06-3201 `, TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................. 3 Capacity/Level of Service Analysis PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRAFFIC GENERATION ........... 5 Traffic Generation Pass-by Trips Traffic Distribution PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................... 9 Background Traffic Volumes Capacity/Level of Service Analysis Site Access ST[JDY CONCLUSIONS ......................................... 13 APPENDICES .................................................. 15 A -Intersection Turning Movement Summary B -HCS Intersection Worksheet C -Background Traffic Information D -Weighted Project Trips Worksheet E -Projected HCS Intersection Worksheets LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 -Site Location .................................... 2 FIGURE 2 -Conceptual Site Plan .............................. 6 FIGURE 3 -Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........... 10 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 -Existing Intersection Level of Service ................. 3 TABLE 2 -Estimated Trip Generation .......................... 5 TABLE 3 -Background Traffic Calculation ...................... 9 TABLE 4 -Projected 2007 Traffic Conditions ................... i 1 INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis was conducted in order to assess the traffic impact of the proposed Bank Atlantic in the northwest quadrant of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old Coachman Road in Clearwater, Florida. The build-out year of the proposed proj ect is 2007. The development will consist of a 4,100 square foot drive-in bank with three drive through lanes (two will be serviced by a teller and the third will provide access to an automatic teller machine). The site is currently occupied by a service station with six fueling positions. Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed development site. Access to the site is proposed via a single full access driveway connecting to Old Coachman Road. Access to Gulf to Bay Boulevard v~~ill be via aright-in/right-out driveway. These two proposed driveways will replace the existing four access connections. C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd wry za, sooe ~ ~ ~ `SYrAa „~•ci 45 ,t^'!1-. ~ _ - Stad ~CC Pao ~ ~ NafurePkAn z•~ 9R~~ ~-`r1~;~~,~r~~`"~„~»..'`~, i~'r b 60 '~!P'~"'~L'~2 590 ~ 528 dEne,GYEducCh' C/rBrW1MY.~uiw~^~,~u~yt '!(f --~ `S.w ~ . -/ • su~P m s ^ Ba . r Btw 60 ~r~ A Y.9aedilOi T N r+' '~' _ ~ ~k'~a"~. ~``~ j- Y]f,C ~~~~~ ~ o ~~ ~ 651 ©C er t bu ^~ilBBlW~dr~ • l-~ x...3-~"` 4 ~.,~ `i~„r-.! at, ~astorton:, s ~ Gkm Oaks Com De' MaN ~ ~f ~`~° ~ ~?~'~'~fi ~3 r 699 ~/'tA7t/k3p'~' -~ A GC Hosp ater ~J.,.-,;;r ~i } ~" "'x ~~~`-1'€ ~''-183 ~ ?~vlEaWivD ~~d¢ =l1KEME AD Site "h u .~~ '~`.2" G ~. :~9C~ ~ 9rvw'>prk1°. ~~ 375 g 19 ~'~ ~- ~ xF-•-d°~~-` :-.~.~ ~ '~~~ ~~!1~'-1 33 ~ 4 ENR Rp :~ .`~ r,+F,.,,,.,~~*h-.} ~ ~.,. .~~ ,i. s ~, 464 -~ y ..= 611 .~~-~`--',,. ~" ~,~~( ~ ' ` ~ 501 ~- ~ ~ ~''-j1 ' 1 :~.. ~ _ ~ 1 L~. 3 ~, p . { ~ r: ~i~~"~~~--J'.~-~~ .std ~ ~., OaCfl ` ~,.^~ ~ "' 19 ~ ,~ " tY4 Cove Coy . -- ,, r 1~ ~aac ~ ~4 a = ~ X ~ H1gh _ ~ ~ k utc f Lar ~- ~ ~' -~ OiE ~ B... _ I#rifs ^ 666 g AY4 T point ~~ ~;~ .l J f. / ~ cA~ ~ W BAY DR Larpp tr East Bay .. ^ 2 _~~.~...... - <.;;`... r .; , aTNA~fsw Piri~tC GC Golf ~ ~~~Christlan BaYAri?a ~, feather ` z i H .roras ~ y; ~ & C C ~IFaith ~ Oulkt Mali ~ ~'~ ~~ Sounder C ''183 -'~ rerkr_.. g,~ P Hi1tCC ~ yColtege -~ c Fairway ~., , t y -^ Sur,coasr ,. - ' ~.,.~. ~ Sun Coat ~` g 2 : Village ~ =i t~ H ~ - ~. Alrco Flile Welcome ' ~ ©HospRd! N -;i ~ ULMERTON G C ~ ~ p a ~ RO 2 ^ •. 699 11~." e° Se+entyGxAertsJ '~-- ~ ~y j _~' w~ x ood Florida ',' Largo a i Ca ~ .i t 1\q 688 . ~ ~ ~urt 8oranical;i Mall :: `i 693 Catholic .' ~°°~, t rpo b \ 688 ' 4 G H Course ~ &~Coast Mu t Art y ~ij ,Cemetery i _ . t r`rr WALSI GHAM HerRaye RO ,._i ~ ! ~ ,__~~.---.--•-;natty A~ N ,`~- . c Vl/kge?~p'~s151~ham it .~ ~ ~'i 1I WalsMpha~•:~enY,ir ~ 4 VAN.:: OKAY !~ RD 1 ~ ~/ ~ 1 233 PaY,': .. ~ 0er::..;:._:.._.._ ---•-=- © ~.~ C r ,- a ~ < sY 615 ,, ~ ~~' 811 590 , ARY1rAT;£R . CORE ~' ~' a 41RDINIAST = s: 7opo1 c/,tptlauqua ~~ Safety ~ ~"" ;H>~~4CH , ~r~r a ~ 3 rtorogy ~ ~;~ me sr>r~nAnr,OY = Harbor ~`•~. ~ ~oor~ i ~ Park ~ 425 ° _:~ ~°~d MemPirt -` " ~ ~~ a ~ "r+ I' ~- i r. ~` 3 g SUNSET _,__~~' _'~~~-PDINT_~ 6 _ RD_~I• MNN 5T a ~~' ~ ,~ F ~ 0 576 -- ,--=__.- G , r1st~N~a ~ ~~,;,~, ~ ~ ~ ., . ~ Clearwa er i ~~ ,. ~ :. ~' ~ ~ Cleo ater 590 ;QTR sT,c~- ~ Aeafut~-it~s-o ~ , arurater~~ rho . ,~ ~ 75 ql k ;; Ruth;~~A~,r~t,yl.,a~.~ ~ ~~- ~:^ ~ s' ~ %~ `~~ Russell 5 z Cbanvater' pG~ 2 fCkard~ ~¢ ~,.fi,©'bP~7~ ~ ~ ~, MB Cbanv er Gofl ~~ _~' Moaasb, lsire~ll , ~ '~ +d!.:'~ ~'~ yr ,'4 .. ~ "- ~:: I ~( ~, I tNmdmoor -: 68 10~IiD ~ :::Q~~ a I HealtnCdre . ~: ~ 595 '~° L' 1 Bardmoor ~ ~~, i T027D= Af N ~;\Mainfands G C =.~ 2 C A~e -~ ° yi ~-" '' Tennis BayDUi; y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, .Smlook gii Club Club ~ ! ~ 694 rB5`. ~•.t y H ~ ,;"i; I 6111 19 e~'- t ~ 9 c I ~ ::vb„a, 501 y $ ~~' ~~'. ,. ~i"_ PMK ° = $willlftdi8 ~' Y i.~leaMar6et~1 ifg n@~1aS 55 ~ `~ sa.~YDY .. JAid' PAAK ': 1• :: -"Seminote Maf!'~~- s ' ^ i ~ eLw g8~~ ,i N rr:_: ii •1F3i1YE A ~ ~~+ Tides Golf Club r G 1.694 ., s ii ParkSkle ^~. -. ,- ~ •'~~ s ~ 693 = _!! Mall ~~ \`\ n 2i, ~ r ~ '~Pmterve ~ ~ ~° ~ Alf yF 5 n Shor@s ~ ~• jib r ; I Florida Inst t ~i] Northslde Nosp ~ `~ «.* 1 g Seminole felts Y ;; Trdtl Chime Med ~& Heart lost ~ 689 D • ~ CountryCtub~F T ~ ~ 54711 :iMemortN Park ~~~ AVE - ....= N ~ni~#nn ~~~C~t . ~`.. ',~ BAY PINES. 4aTH'AVE x :%Cemerery y 9 -_. _ Guga~~ ':,666 'vA ~ BeyPk^s ~ 1s 3 KennB~ City;; ~ 4 0 ~e~tl $11!!C~! fi99 ~ 1VdtlCem; a ~TM 184 ~ - ~'_ A1f -__._ -.:7S _ ~, ~~ 7 .. .' r7/1~~ iM!n! ~ 1 w~ q N ~ ©erersbur~ .: `7 f 1 - X ~ ~ ~ 1 „Pet rshur m ~ ^~.. lddr.. 595 IGen Hosp [~ N I~u WE luke Bann Atiant~c s transportation engineering Site Location Figure 1 consultants C:ILTEC1O6LTECProject132O1 Bank Atlantic.wpd.rulyza,zoos 2 b EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A survey was conducted of the existing roadway segments and study intersection that will be impacted by the proposed development. The purpose of this survey was to obtain information on physical and traffic characteristics of these facilities. Gulf to Bay Boulevard: This is a six-lane divided east-west roadway with a posted speed limit of 40 mph adjacent to the study site. It is functionally classified as an arterial roadway. Old Coachman Road: This is a four-lane undivided north-south roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 mph adjacent to the study site. It is functionally classified as a collector roadway. Table 1 provides a listing of the roadway parameters used in the analysis. As can be seen, this table shows the number of lanes, adopted level of service {LOS) standard and maximum service volume by roadway segment. ~~~~ ~ F,~.'~!~TiNf~ RnAlf~~~AY ('~NI;tITiONS Adopted P.1Vi. Peak Peak 1Vle~ets Roadway # Of Peak Hour (1 Hour 'Traff'ic Hour Adopted S went Lanes LOS Ca achy 'volumes (Z LOS LOS Gulf to Bay Boulevard EB V-TB Keene Rd to US l9 5LD D 2,790 1,857 2,288 C Yes Old Coackman Road ~ SB Drew St to Gulf to Bay Blvd 4LU D 1,140 b i 2 323 D Yes {I) Pinellas Counn~ {2) LTEC n•a, fj'ac count Capacity/Level of Service Analysis Roadways: To determine the existing Levels of Service provided by the roadway sections to be impacted by the proposed redevelopment, a capacity analysis was conducted using the roadway traffic volumes from the traffic count data collected in the field. As can be seen from Table 1, all impacted facilities currently operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS) and have available capacity for P.M. peak traffic conditions. C:ILTEC106 LTEC Projectt3201 BankAtlantic.wpd ruiyaa, ~ooc 3 Intersection: A P.M. peak hour turning movement count was conducted Thursday, 3une 22, 2006. (A Copy of the existing turning movement summary sheet is included in Appendix A) The existing turning movement traffic counts were seasonally adjusted using the Florida DOT factor of 1.0. The study intersection was analyzed under existing conditions using the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for signalized intersections. This analysis used existing traffic volumes, existing PHF and existing geometric conditions. The Level of Service and intersection delay at the study intersection is as follows (see Appendix B for HCS worksheet): Trams c Average Intersection Control LOS Delay (sec/veh~ Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old Coachman Road Signal D 37.5 As can be seen, the study intersection operates at an acceptable level of service. C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 BankAtlantic.tivpd ~utyza, ~ooa 4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRAFFIC GENERATION As indicated earlier, the proposed redevelopment is to consist of a 4,100 square foot drive-in bank which will replace the existing gas station. Figure 2 shows the conceptual site plan. To determine the impact of this parcel redevelopment, an analysis of the existing and proposed traffic characteristics were made. This included. the determination of the traffic generated by the proposed development and the distribution and assignment of this new traffic to adjacent roadway segments. Traffic Generation The P.M. peak hour traffic generation for the existing and proposed development was determined using the T'h Edition ITE Trip Generation Report trip generation research data as identified in Table 2. As can be seen, the existing development generates an estimated i,Ol 1 daily trips and 84 trips during the P.M. peak hour with 42 vehicles entering and 42 vehicles exiting the site. The proposed redevelopment generates an estimated 1,011 daily trips and 188 trips during the P.M. peak hour with 94 vehicles entering and 94 vehicles exiting the site. TABLE 2 F.ct;matPd Trim (~~enrrAtinn fil ITE T ' Generation Rates Taal T ' Voinmes Land Use PM Peak Hoar ~ PM Peak Honr Land Use Size Code / (2 Dailf~ Total In Unt Daily 'T'otal In Out Ezis#ing Land•Use Gas Station 6 ~~P 944 / R 168-56 13.86 6.93 6.93 1,011 84 42 42 Pass-b}'trips (3) NeR' Net (Primary) Trips 425 586 ~ 36 48 18 24 18 24 Proposed Land Use Drive-in Bank 4,100 SF 9i2 / R 246.49 45.74 22.87 22.87. 1,011 188 94 94 s~1- ~ V~~ ?j Z Pass by trips {3) NeEV Net {Primary) Trips 425 586 80 3.08 40 54 40 54 Increase /(Decrease) 0 b0 ~ 30 30 (1J Trip Generation Rates.¢•om 7th Edition ojITE 71ip Generation Report, 2003. (2J R = Ai~erage T}-ip Rare per T'ehicle Feeling Posrtian or Ai~erage TiYp Rote per 1,000 Sgaar•e Feel (3J Pass-by Percentage from ITE "Trip Generation Hm~dbook, "Jane 2004. Chapter 5, Table 5.28 Lm~d Use 944 - Chaptea• S, Table 3.20 Land Use 912 - 42°/u ~ 6 ~~ 47°/a `L~n `,~lY ,~ ~~ ~~ ; ~ ~ vvl~ Vix ~ fl ~1 C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd .i~.t}. 28, 1006 5 ~ ~ --~~-- I r- - I sl II 1 ~ I i I I I 1 I 1 I f oomvc m~m I I ~ t I I 1 I I ~ I I I l' I ,~___ I I~~ Luke tRnsportatio~ engineering consultants GULF TO BAY BLVD. (S.R. 60) Bank Atlantic Conceptual Site Plan Q O Z Q U a 0 U J Figure 2 I W t W E S C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic. wpd ~„iy ~e, zoos 6 • Pass-bv Trips • The total driveway trips generated by either the gas station or the drive-in bank will comprise "new (primary)" and "pass-by" trips. Pass-by trips are defined as those trips from the passing roadway stream that would already be on the road. Therefore, pass-by traffic does not create additional impact on the surrounding roadways. For this site, the pass-by traffic will be drawn from Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old Coachman Road. Based upon pass-by information contained in the ITE Trip Generation. Handbook, a gasoline station land use will generate, on average, apass-by percentage of 42%. A drive-in bank will generate a pass-by percentage of 47%. Applying these factors results in 36 gasoline pass-by trips or 80 drive-in bank pass-by trips during the P.M. peak hour. However, the Florida DOT Site Impact Handbook stipulates that pass-by trips should not be higher than i 0% of the adjacent street traffic. The iTE calculated pass-by trips for the drive-in bank are approximately 2% of the existing traffic on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old coachman Road. {Only the through traffic on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and the fatal traffic on Coachman Road was utilized in order to eliminate double counting the turns.) As can be seen, the estimated pass-by trips are less than 10% of the background traffic on adjacent roadways. Pass-by trips are assigned separately as background traffic at the project entrances. Included in Table 2 is the pass-by trip reduction calculation. Background Traffic 3,541 + 506 = 4,047 10% Threshold 405 Pass-by Traffic 80 Is Pass-by > 10% of Adjacent street Traffic? No ((80) _ (4,047) = 0.0198] One additional step must be taken to determine the increase in new net (primary) trips generated by the Bank Atlantic drive-in bank over the number of existing primary gasoline station trips. Subtracting the existing primary trips from the proposed drive-in bank results in the actual increase in the number of new trips, the redeveloped site will generate. This calculation is shown in Table C:ILTECt06LTECProject13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd.~ty2a,~oo6 7 A t 2. Traffic Distribution The project's trip distribution pattern for the increase in new net (primary) trips was determined based on a review of the existing traffic patterns. The resulting distribution defined the directional pattern of vehicle trips to and from the site as follows: • To/from east on Gulf to Bay Boulevard ...................... 44% • To/from west on Gulf to Bay Boulevard ..................... 36% • To/from north on Old Coachman Road ...................... 18% • To/from south on Old Coachman Road ..................... 2% 100% The Project's increase in new net (primary) peak hour trips were assigned to the study roadway segments. The Projects total traffic was assigned at the proposed access connection. Project traffic entering and exiting at the proposed access connections consists of pass-by traffic and new net (primary) traffic. C:ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic. wpd r„ry za, zoos 8 PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS To determine the future operating conditions on the study roadways, the project traffic was added to background traffic. Background traffic is defined as existing traffic plus growth traffic on the roadway network in the future year at the build-out of the Project in 2007. Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic consists of exiting traffic volumes projected for one year using a growth factor of 1.036. This growth factor was based on historical Florida DOT traffic counts tsee Appendix C for the Florida DOT data). Table 3 presents the P.M. peak hour background traffic volumes for each study roadway segment. The P.M. peak hour traffic projections at the study intersections were determined by combining existing plus historical growth plus project traff c as shown in Figure 3. SABLE 3 BACKGR{)ITND "TRA~`FIC CALCULA'I'It~NS Roadv~~ay P.1Vi. Peak Hour Traffic '~?olumes Se ent ~zistin (~) Growth (2 Dac ound {3) Gulf to Day Boulevard Keene Rd to US 19 EB i,8$7 ~~ 2,288 EB R~ 37 46 l;~ 1,894 ~JB 2,334 Old Coachman Road Drew St to Gulf to Day Bivd NB 612 S~ 323 NB SB 12 6 I~TB 624 SB 329 (1) Fronr ?'able 1 (2) Florida DDT historical gro~rtla factor of 1.02_(i•om Count Station 0075. (3) Ea-isting + Cn•ois~th = Baclrgrouttd Capacity/Level of Service Analysis Roadwa~ts: An analysis was conducted to determine if adequate capacity was available on each study roadway segment. Each impacted roadway segment was analyzed by comparing its total P.M. peak hour volume to the available capacity of the segment as shown in Table 4. The results of this analysis indicate that the study roadway segments will continue to have adequate capacity at the time of the prof ect's completion. Project trips on Gulf#o Bay Boulevard represent weighted Project trips. See Appendix D for the weighted trips' worksheet. C: ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd .t~yzs, loot 9 Legend: 000+{000)=000 t Tatal Trafic Project Trafic Background Traffic 330+(0)=330 3+(10j-9J3 Bank Adandc site O 20+(20)=40 '~ 5~{4)=9 <--1,980+(4)=1,984 1,894+(19)=1,913 --~ Gulf to Bay Blvd. 1~~ Juke ~~ transportation engineering consultants 3+{10)=13 ~ 17+(24)=41 ~ 0 U 204+{19)=228 58{1)=59 85+(49 125+{19)=144 ~ 1,738-~0)=1,738 31+(0)=31 ~ 624{0)=624 32+40)=72 '~ 447+{20)=467 1,845+{4)=1,845 ,`-45+(0)=45 f 44+(0}=44 84{1)=85 59{0}=59 BankAtiantic Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N W E s not to scale Figure 3 C:ILTEC106LTECProject13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd.ruiyza,zoa6 10 ~. TABLE 4 PRnr~rT~n 2nn7 TRAFFIC" C'C)NDITIONS P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Meets Roadway tf Of Background Project Total fidopted Segment Lanes Trips (1) Trips Trips LOS LO5 Gulf to Bay Boulevard EB VdB EB w$ EB wB Keene Rd to iJS 19 (21 6LD 1,894 2,334 11 1 l 1,905 2,345 C Yes Old Coachman Road NB S~ NB SB NB SB Drew St to Gulf to Bay Bivd 2L 624 329 5 5 629 334 D Yes (I) From Tab3e 3 (2) i'raject Trips represent r~eighted rolumes. See Appendix D for si>orksheel. Intersections: To analyze the projected conditions for the study intersections, the study intersections were analyzed using the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Detailed printouts of the intersection analyses may be found in Appendix E. The projected Levels of Service and delay for the study intersections are as follows: Traffic Average Intersection Control LOS Delay (seclveh~ Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old Coachman Road Signal D 42.8 Oid Coachman Road and Project Entrance A STOP A//B' 8.2//13.8' Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Project Entrance B STOP B 2 i2.0 2 ' Major Street NB Left Tura Movements I/ Minor Street EB Movements 2 Minor Street SB Right Turn Movement As can be seen, at build-out of the development, the signalized study intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. The proposed Project Entrances will also operate at an acceptable level of service. C:ILTEC106LTECProject13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd.rutyzs,zooc 11 Site Access The proposed access connection plan for the Bank Atlantic drive-in bank on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old Coachman Road will eliminate two of the existing four access driveways. The existing access driveways closest to the intersection will be closed. The remaining Gulf to Bay Boulevard access driveway will be reconfigured to provide better circulation. The existing north access driveway on Old Coachman Road will be relocated approximately 120 feet north. This will align the proposed access connection with the existing driveway on the east side of Old Coachman Road. C:ILTEC106LTECProject13201 BankAtlantic.wpd ~uryza.zoos 12 • STUDY CONCLUSIONS This study was conducted in order to evaluate existing/projected traffic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed Bank Atlantic in Clearwater, Florida. The proposed redevelopment consists of a 4,100 square foot drive-in bank. The results of the study as documented herein are summarized below: • The proposed redevelopment of the existing gasoline station with the Bank Atlantic site will generate an increase in new net (primary) P.M. peak hour volume of 50 trips. • The build-out year of the proposed project is 2007. • The study roadways will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service upon build-out of the proposed development. • The existing signalized study intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service upon build-out of the proposed development. • Access connections to the proposed development will eliminate two of the existing four access driveways. One access driveway will be located on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and will be a right-in/right-out driveway. The second access driveway will be relocated approximately 120 feet north of the existing driveway on Old Coachman Road and will be a full access connection driveway. The proposed project driveways should be designed to City of Clearwater and Florida DOT design standards. C: tLTEC106 LTEC Projectl3201 Bank Atlantic. wpd ~uiy ~a, Zon6 13 • APPENDICES C: IL7'EC106 LTEC Project 13201 Bank Atlantic. tivpd guy Za, zoo6 1 S APPENDIX A Existing Intersection Turning Movement Summary Sheet C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic.rovpd .t~rr 28, 2006 • • Summary of Vehicle 1VIovemeats i ..Uo TroncnnrtAfinn F.nvinPr~rinv fnncnltante Pro ect: Bank Afian~ic LTEC OS-4201 ~~~ N/S Road: Old Coachman Rd Observer: GE _ Ine[ E/W Road: Gulf to Bay B)vd ~VeaTl~er. Clear II~T~~-~~~~tl[,1. i i Date: Thursday, June 22, 2006 Rd "CAndition: nrrr nc rnp Dry [° ~`~~~n[= City: Clearwater Signal: Yes Township: Cciunty: Pinellas Range: £Dp3' Sp: 1 Pk i-Tr Factor: 0.96 Section: Seasonally Adiusted P M Peak Hour Turning Movement Summary - 4:45 - 5:45 Speed: 35 MI'H ~ D SB: Old Coachman Rd 0.655 323 ~$ Speed: 40 MPH D 83 57 183 WB: Gulf to Bav Blvd 0.514 Ex>.s ~g er~ec ion Summary V+~i~s e~4 1,961 ,~ 3 ~ 5 3 1,820 2,288 106 -mss s~ ~ 1,857 1,721 ~ 3 I 1,947 ~ ~ ~ D 30 -~ Speed: 40 MPH 58 82 43 0.540 £$: Gulf to Bav $h>d i31 183 N Noze: 3 = 3 Section Head D ~ NB: Old Coachman Rd s _ s Seczioz; Head 0.583 S d: 35 MPH P.M. Peak Old Coachman Rd Old Coachmau Rd Gulf to Bay Blvd Gnlf to Bay Blvd Hour Northbound Southbound lrastbound tJJ>rstbound Time interval 3,t Tiuu Rt Lt 3iuu R1 it 'Ilaru Rt Lt -Tfiru Rt # Lanes 1 1 < 1 i < 1 3 1 1 3 < 4:00 4:15 i4 19 l7 43 li 31 9 431 13 20 427 90 4:15 4:30 14 22 l8 37 i6 22 20 377 lb 12 416 $8 4:30 4:45 15 13 i3 46 l0 28 22 442 18 b 445 66 4:45 5:00 i2 21 7 38 i5 20 22 408 5 ii 463 105 Hours r Sum 55 75 55 164 52 101 73 1,658 52 49 1,751 349 5:00 5:15 13 19 8 53 17 25 33 464 9 l6 456 99 5:15 5:3fl 12 18 i8 42 12 25 35 421 7 ii 450 101 5:30 5:45 21 24 10 50 13 13 1 b 428 9 6 45l 119 5:45 6:00 8 i5 i3 48 9 20 16 3$8 12 8 438 92 Hourly Sum 54 76 49 193 51 83 I00 1,701 37 43 1 795 411 Peak Hour 4:45 5:45 58 82 43 l83 57 83 l06 1721 30 44 1,820 424 P.M. Peak Hour Summary - Seasonali ~ A d'usted with F-OT Fact or 4:45 5:45 58 82 43 183 57 83 106 1,72i 30 44 1820 424 .Peak 15 21 24 i8 53 17 25 35 464 9 16 463 119 Turns 31.7% 44.8% 23.5% 56.7% l 7.6% 25.7% 5.7% 92.7% 1.6% 1.9% 79.5% i 8.5% A r Total 183 323 1,857 2,288 A r % 3.9% 6.9% 39.9% 49.2% Awa Total 612 131 1,947 1,961 Awa % Turns l 7.3% 13.4% 69.3% 33.6% 43.5% 22.9% 9.4% 88.4% 22% 3.0% 92.8% 4.2% Pk Hr Factor 0.69 0.85 0.60 0.86 0.84 0.83 0.7b 0.93 0.83 0.69 0.98 0.89 A roach 0.83 0.85 0.92 0.99 C.• tLTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic. wpd Jy~ za, zoos ~~ APPENDIX B HCS Intersection Worksheet C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 BankAtlantic.wpd .idyza, zoos • HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: Inter.: GtB & OC Agency: LTEC Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/26/2006 Jurisd: Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: Existing E/W St: Gulf to Bay Boulevard N/S St: Old Coachman Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SDMMARY { Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R { L T R I L T R I I I i I 1 No. Lanes I 1 3 1 1 1 3 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L T R{ L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 1106 1721 30 !99 1820 424 158 82 43 1183 57 83 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 9 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A { Thru A Right A I Right A Peds X I Peds WB Left A A ! SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A A Right A { Right A A Peds Y. I Peds Y> NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 8.0 59.0 8.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ali Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 180 1770 0.61 0.60 30.9 C T 2901 9883 0.75 0.49 25.8 C 26.0 C R 778 1583 0.09 0.49 15.8 B Westbound L 180 1770 0.26 0.60 16.9 B TR 2399 9778 1.00 0.99 97.8 D 97.2 D Northbound L 258 1238 0.23 0.21 90.0 D TR 368 1766 0.35 0.21 91.2 D 90.8 D Southbound L 355 1770 0.59 0.32 36.3 D TR 537 1697 0.27 0.32 30.9 C 39.0 C Intersection Delay = 37.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D C: ILTEC106 LTEC Projectl3201 Bank Ailantic.wpd rur~~ za, zooa • APPENDIX C Background Traf#ic Information C:ILTEC106LTECProject13201 BankAtlarrlic.wpdJ„tyss,zoos Print Date: July 26, 2006 Florida Department of Transporhttion T'ransporhttion Slntistics Office 2004 AADT Forecast COUNTY: 15 -- P.INELLAS SITE DESCRIPTION 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 0075 SR 60/GULF TO BAY BL, VV OF OLb COACN~4AN RD/CR 5: 55,100 56,100 57,200 58,300 59,300 60,400 61,500 62,500 63,600 64,700 2007 Grewth r'nctor Cnicutntion 57,100 + 56,100 -1.0178, Use 1.02 This report estimates the future AADT for a site based upon that site's historical AADT. These estimates should only be used as afirst guess; more detailed analysis is required for planning purposes. Future year AADT estimates are straight-line projections behveen 1991-1993 average and the 2001-2003 average. Future AADT estimates will only be projected for a time period commensurate with the amount of history available, This means, for example, if there is only 5 years of history available at a site, the AADT will only be projected for 3 years. • • Projected AAbT estimates are rounded ro the nearest thousand vehicles. Paae: • APPENDIX D Weighted Project Trips Worksheet C: ILTEC106 LTEC Projectl3201 Bank Atlantic.wpd ad~~ 28, 1006 r APPENDIX VJPiahtPri ~r~niPCt Tries wor~ks~eet Segment Length Weighted Length Project Times Project Roadway Se meat (Feet Teri s Tri s Tri s Gulf to Bad Boulevard Eastbound Keene Rd to Old Coachman Rd 9,285.0 11 i 02,135.0 Old Coachman Rd to US 19 L263.0 13 16.419.0 Total 10,548.0 118,554.0 ii Gulf to Ba3T Boulevard Westbound Keene Rd to Old Coachman Rd 9,285.0 11 102, i 35.0 Old Coachman Rd to US 19 1.263.0 13 1b,419.0 Total 10,548.0 i 18,554.fl 11 C:ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 BanlcAtlantic.wpd .~,ty~s, moe C~ • APPENDIX E Projected HCS Intersection Worksheets C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic.wpd .wtyza, zoos ~ i HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: JTR Inter.: GtB & OC Agency: LTEC Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/26/2006 Jurisd: Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips E/W St: Gulf to Bay Boulevard N/S St: Old Coachman Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SII[~1ARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R i L T R I i I i I I No. Lanes I 1 3 1 ] 1 3 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1199 1738 31 195 1895 467 159 85 99 1223 59 89 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 i 0 1 D I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 9 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left R Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A A Right A I Right A A Peds X I Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 8.0 59.0 8.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ali Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Rppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) vIc g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 180 1770 0.83 0.60 60.1 E T 2901 9883 0.75 0.49 26.0 C 28.9 C R 778 1583 0.04 0.99 15.8 B Westbound L 180 1770 0.26 0.60 17.1 B TR 2396 9771 1.03 0.49 56.2 E 55.9 E Northbound L 256 1228 0.29 0.21 90.1 D TR 368 1768 0.37 0.21 9i.3 D 90.9 D Southbound L 350 1770 0.66 0.32 91.9 D TR 536 1699 0.29 0.32 31.1 C 37.6 D Intersection Delay = 42.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D C: I LTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic. wpd ~~~y zs, ~ooc • HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: JTR Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 7/26/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: OCr & Ent A Jurisdiction: Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips East/West Street: Project Entrance A North/South Street: Old Coachman Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 72 624 330 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 75 656 397 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- - - -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR Opstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 13 41 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR 13 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 958 queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I I LR 1195 466 0.06 0.12 0.20 0.91 8,2 13.8 A B 13.8 B C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 BankAtlantic.wpd J„ty2a, aooe HCS+: Onsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: JTR Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 7/26/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: GtB & Ent B Jurisdiction: Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips East/West Street: Gulf to Bay Boulevard North/South Street: Project Entrance B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 19 S 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 1913 1989 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2013 2088 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median TypelStorage Raised curb / 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Dpstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR n2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 I R v {vph) _ 92 C(m) {vph) 553 v/c 0.08 95g queue length 0.25 Control Delay 12.0 LOS B Approach Delay 12.0 Approach LOS B C:ILTEC106LTECProject13201 BanlcAtlantic.wpdrvlysa,zooc • Ca~a~~ur~es~ January3,'L000 Mr. Scott.l3runner, ~'E. Traff c Eiigi~~ecr Calvin Giordano & Asso'ciaYcs, .I?c: ~h0l~illage Baule.vard., Suite 3;40 West Palen Beach, Florida 334QG Subjeef: Bank Atla~itie-Weston Dear .Mr. I3ruttner: 6363. N.vr. ~ war Suite 30Q Ft: LauderdoM; Ft 33344: Phone: QSA.315.7OOt ~aa: 95A.3 7 5.'i 0'A O v~rnv.c-b.com As you. ~,vill reealI, eve had <a feid meeting on November l 1, 2005 at the proposed. Bank Atlantic Site located on Mediterranean Road just east of Weston Road :in the City of Weston: Tl~e purpose of this meeting ytras to discuss several size rel.ateci issues- regarding traffic. At-the conclusion of this meeting; the one ie~n that required further:analy5is r~~as. the proposed :queuing area for the drive=thru (apes. .Based upon our .discussions, eve have learned that the City of Weston generally requires that each :drivve-tluo.ugh lane at .a bank have .a queuing area suET~icienf far up to sia (6) vehicles. The. proposed. site -,plan `far the subject: Bank Atlantic facility has three. drive= tiuouglt lanes, each with a .queuing .capaci:ty of fve (5} vehicles. 't'he Applicant believes that the.proposed queuing area is adequate and we offer the following information for your consideration.: 1. National Standards. Relative to Queuing Areas. A review of the Institute, of Transportation Erigitaeers .reference :manual entitled Ti~ansportatorr aft .Laird Det~eloprrreirt 2':~ ~citiora by Vergil ~: Stover and Flank J. iCoepke, suggests .that .as few as tn~o (2) ilrivv~throug}i lanes would. be suff eient for a bent- facility .of the size in .question. (See Table 11-4; Page. l I-1t3.) Based. upon acceptable ~~rating tinges :and customer perceptions of queues (ls` paragraph; Page 1.1-1 S); .it .is reported that. the ma_ximurr~ queue for adrive-through lane would. be six (G} vehicles. With :two (2.} lades-and each ~~ith a capacity of six (Fi} vehicles;. the ultimate capacity would be f2 vehicles; T.he site plan, as proposed,, lies an ultimate capacity of 15 vehicles (three lanes ivitlr five vehicles each): 2. Operational: Cldaractcristcs of Sark Atlantic.. Based. upon com~ersatons with Batik Atlantic: representatives, it is .evident that the uui.que operating characteristics of their facilities leave a direct impact on #Iieir drive-through. operations;: specifically vehicle queue lengths. Fore ii~sta~ice; most Sank Atlantic brruiches are open 7' days tier week. Tl~e .hours o;f operation (for both: tl~e drive-tlu'ouah lanes and the lobby) are Mo~iday-Saturday 7:;30 AM to 8:00. P1V1 and ou Sunday from 11:00 AM to X1:00 PM: It is anticipated that the G:\prmductiiinljbbsW703b31Queuiit~ Rr.S~nnsc 01-03-~G:dcm Corer 8 Burgess, InC. Cpfi@rL.BWQCyS CGnSUIlUnfS, IAe. G88 AreArit8clslbregi~tee ~, lire: CSB ArchiteclsJEngiraee~s, PC. C&8 Newda, lnc. a ,~ ~ • • prapased: Wesiord liranel3 drill be .open 24 hours. per day, 7 days. per lveek. ay coanparison, naosl .baiai l.olibies closz at 4:0~ Pivt, their dcive,ilirough lanes are open. aiiitil 5:00 PM {Friday's until 6OQ PM}; and there :are ao ~~reekelad laours~ As a result .af these operating characteristics, Bank Atlantic officials iiadicate that: their observed peak. periods of operation,. and more :specifcally filer ~reliic]e queues iii the dr`~~e=tlarota~;h. lalaesa are .n3ueh .less; pronounced. as compared ~~rtla that of typical. banks. As such, the suUject site is expected to ex}aibited shorter queues in the drive-tlirough_Ianes as compared with standard batiks, even more so liven that it is anti:cipateii to be opera ?4 hours per day. 3, Field Observations .at Siniar -Bank Atlantac I'aciitles. '1'o eontirna tlie:reported operating claractcristics anti, as recommended by you, ~vq have cgnd..ucted Feld observations at four (4) other IBaik. Atlantic branches in Broward County.. The purpose of this .exercise is to docuraietit actual drive-through lane :demand. on a fypi+cal Friday between 1.i:30 AM and 1.;30 PM and taet~veen 330 PM :and 6;40 PM. The ~riaaxiniu;iia number of vehicles observed in each drive.-thru lane vas documented in fire minute intervals. The results of this data collection effort are. contained in an attachment, to this report and the results are suarimariZed as :fol lows:: a 3401 Pine Island: Road, Sunrises This facility leas 3 drive-tlarii .lanes and was observed on Friday; .November I8, 2005. The total maxian'um observed number of vehicles for:the drive=thru lanes vas 9 rvhicla.occurred at 3;30 PM, The ntaximuni nuiaiber of vehicles in.:any one lane w.as 4 which occurred only once(betweeii 3::30 aiid 3:35 PN1j: 1901 N, Pinc Island R[3ad, Planta8ion: Tlis facility liar 3 drive~ihru .lanes, oiae ATM lane, and vas observed on. Friday, ~lovcta`iber 18, 2005:. The total inaximuni olaseri%ed number of vehicles. for the drive-thru ;lanes was 15 ~vhicIa occurred auriag. five separate 5 aniraute intervals. Tlae ' maximum number of vehicles. in any one lane vas b which occurred oily once (between 5:5.5 and 6:40 Plvi) in the ATNl lane. A :queue of 5 vehicles occutYed during three separate 5 taainute.intervals•. ^ 1GOQ Soiitla Tederal Iighwa}~, I'onapano Beach:. 'I'#.iis:facility has.3 drive- thi'u lanes, one ATIVI.:lane. atad tivas observed on .Friday. December 9, 2005. T.he total nia~:iiaium abserved_ number of vehicles for the lave-tlaru lanes vas. 7 which occurredl_ bettveer~ 4;55 P1V1 anti,. 5:05 1'1vM. The maximum nuaaalier caf vehicles in any one lane- was 4 lvliicli: occurred lietweeaa 5:40..aiid 5:50 PIl~j. _ o 3233 N~ 14'h Street Causeway, Pompano Beach: This facility has 3 drive-tlaru lanes and yeas observed.on Friday, Decernter 9, 20Q5. The total naaxin~uni observed. number of velaicies for the drive-thru Ianes kvas. 8 which :occurred at 3:55 P1vI. "The laaaximum iauaaber of veliicles.in any :one: G>\productienljnbs?A7o363\Queuing it~s~crose 01-U3-Oh.doc Carter .~; Bw.ci^s,.inc. Coi;erE, ksrge„.trchidec[;~Enclinerss: Frs. C,ar:_-d:{i~arq•^3; ~onsulteri[,, lnc ~h`.i Archi?~•etg~ Er~ine~r_, Inc: C3[S..4rd~~[vc==r."nginrers, F!", CEB t-igvcdo, inc.. idiY~n i, Laird.?~rci~itt[s/: nnnE:_rs.. i r~, +Y ~ • lane vas 5 i~vhch. ocauried only once (behveena54 and ~ ;~$ PIvI)_ since the other .lams hacl.no vehicles. at. this tune, it is apparent that they were not open during: this 5-mi.i~ute tiia~e irate. real. Based upon. Elie :foregong_ information and data, it appears that the drive-tltru facilities at the: proposed Bai~c Atlantic facility to tie loea#~d in Weston will functifln adequately as c~rreilfl'y designed. W.e hope that this additional ii~forrnation is satisfactory; :however; .i:f you have.any further questions or co~nn~ents, pleas'do not hesitate. to contact us: :Sincerely, CAIt`I'ER & BURGESS; INC.. Karl B. Peterson, P.E: 'Senior Project Manager .Karl B. Peterson, P.E.. Florida Registration IVunuer49's97 EtZgineering $usness Nunb;rr 5300 t~f~~ G:lgmduction`yobsW 70363~Qneuing:Rcsponse Ol -03-~G. Aoc Ct;ri~r & 6ur~ :<., ii:: Cof2~r ~, Bvitl~•>s A;cSiitcrt;/Eii~nc-ens,, fr+c: Cofer ~ B~nr;4 Cons~:tonss. Inc, CAB Arthilc-Sly ~~rigine^i;, InG.. L'aB'~cr c~~ifeels ~~riCiin_Mri,. l?;=, C8B Ncraoa, Enc. Ylion $ Loir3 Fiicfiifetis/~nyirs~+i s, F.C. ~ • A:T"TACHMENT Data Collection • 7"ra~c Survey:Specialists, lnc. S24 Gardenia Terrace, Delray.Bea~h, Florida 33444 Bank.Atlantic Drive Through Queue Qbservations 34fl1 Pine .Island Road, Sunrise, Florida Observed By: Qsvaldo. "JR" Gonzalez. Novemt~r 18th, 2005 T1:30 A 11:35A 11:9Q 11:45 A 11:50 A 11::55 ;4 12:flU 1' 12:05 P 12;1t) P '12:1.5 P 12:20. 'P 12:25 P 12:30 P '] 2:35 P 12:90!' 12:95 P 12:50. P 12;55`PM 9:00 PM 1:05.PM 1:10 PM 1:15' PM 1:20 PM 1;25 PM 3;30 P 3:35 P 3:40 P 3:45 P 3:50 P 9:55 P 4:00 P 4:05 P 9:10 P A.15 P 420.P 4:25.P 9;30 P 4:35 P 4:40 P 4;48 P 9:50 P 4:55 P 5:00 P 5:fl5 P 5:10 P 5:15 P :5:20 P 5:25 PM 5:30 PM 5:35 PM 5:40 PM 5'45 PM 5:50 PM 5;55 PM gal/ #1 13av #~ n~..4t~ e.:. 0 - - 0 p VYI11 fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl 0 2 0 0 2 U 0 0 0 0 p U fl ~ 0 o z 1 0 0 2 2 0 U 2 2 0 ~ 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 Q 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 4 3 2 2 7 3 3 2 8 2 0 2 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 t) 2 0 0 2 3 2 2 ~ ~ o 0 0 0 2 'J S 2: 2. 3 M M M M M M M 1V M M M M M M M M M ~ M ~ _ _. . 2 3 ,,9 M 2 2 © ~ n 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 l) 4. 2 2 2' 6 2 0 0 2 2 0 fl 2 . 2 2 0. ¢ 2 2 3 7 2 0 '0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 6 Z 0 2 4 2 2 0 4 t 3 2: 2 7 0 2. 2. 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 3 7 2 2 2 6 3 2 2 7 2 (? 5 2 2 2 S 2 ~ 3 ~. 2 ... 0 0 2 2 2 2 6 2 3 0 0 0 0 A M M M M M M M M M M M M M !u M M M M M M 2 3 • Trafhe Survey.Specialisfs, Jnc. 624 Gardenia Terrace, Delray Beach,: l=lorida 3344. Bank Atlantic Drive Through.Queue Observations. 19Dt dV Pine Island Road, Plantation, Florida 33322 ObServed.By: Shane Gonzalez IVovember98ih, 2005 9'1;30 AAA 11:35 AJv 11;4[) AfU 11:45:AN 11.:50 AN 1 T55 AN 12:(}0 PN 12:05 PN 72:10 PN 12:15-PM 12:20 PN 12:25 P.M 12:30'PM 12.35 PM 1.2:40 PM i2:45 P.M 72:50 P.M 12:55 PM 1.00 8NI 1:45 PNi 1:10 PM 1:15 PM 7:20 PM 1:25 PM 3:30 P 3:35 P 3140 P 3:45 P 3':50 P 3:55 Pf 40o P. .4:05:8 4:10 P 4:15 P 4:20 P '4'.25 P 4:30 P 4:35 P 4:4.0 P 4:45 P 4:50 P 4x55 P . 5:00 P :5105 P 5:1D I? 5:15 PM 5:20 PM 5:25 PM 5:30 PM 5:35 RM :5:40 PM 5:45.PM 5:50 _RM 5:55 'P.M Bay #1 Bav #2 Ravil~ nTna c,..» 1 3 4 4 2 1:3 1 2 4 3 0. g i 2 2. 2 0 6 1 0 0 U 0 0 2 0 2 ~ 4 I 2 ~ 2 0 4 I 0: 0 p 0 0 i 2 0 0 0 2 I 2 2 3 2 9 I 3 3 3: 2 11 I 3 2 3 0 8 I 3 3 3: 0 9 I. 3 3 4 0 10 4 3 4 0 11 4 q q 3 15 4 4- 4: 2 '14. 3 3 4 2 12 3 2: 3 t? 8 2 2 0 0 4 2 z: 2_ o s 3 3 3 0 g 3 2 2 0 7 2 0 0 o z 2 2 3 0 7 3 2 3 3 11 3 2 3 2 10 3 .3 3 0 9 . 3 '3 3 0 9 2 3 3 0 8 4 4 3 0. 11 5 4 4 2 15 4 3 3 0' 10 4 2 3 0 9 3 3 3 .0 9 3 3 3 3 72 3 3 2 2 10 2 2 2 .. 0 s - 2 2 2 3 9 4 2 2 0 8 4 4 3 0 11 d 4 3 3. 14 4 4 3 2 73 4 4 4 0 1.2 . ~} 4 5 0 13 4 '3 4 .0 t1 4 3 4. 0 11 3 3 3 2 11 3 - 3 3 0 9 ,3 3 3 0 g . 4. 4 `4 . 0 12 4 4 q 3 15 4 3 3 5 !'15 3 3 3 < $ M M M M M ~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 15 . .~ / , • Traffrc Survey 5pecialisls., lnc. 624 Gardenia Terrace, :Delray Beach, Florirta 33444 Bank Afianiic Drive Through Queue Qbservatians: 9600 5auth Federal Highway, Pompano Beach, Florida 33062 Oliserveti By: Shane Gonzalez Friday, December 9th; 200:5 Noie: There is a 4ih bay bui it has_no iellerequiprrientinslalled. Bay #1 B8V #~ BaV#3 :ATM St,m :30 AM Z ---- -2.. :35 AM . 2: 2 :40 AM 0 `45 AM ' 0. :50 AM 0 55 AM 0 00 PM 2 2 05 P1VI 2 2 i0 PM 0 7 5 plvl 2 2 2: 6 20 PM 2 2 4 25 PM 2 2 4 30 pM 2 3 5 35 PM 0 40 PM 0 95 .PM Q 50 PNd 0 55. pM 0 00 .PM Z 3 DS PM 2 2 4 10 PM 2 .2 4 15 PM 2 2 4 20 Pivl 2 2 25 PM 2 2 x:30 PlVI __ 2 2 :35 PM 2 Z ~:90 ~M 0 :d5 PM 2 2 4 50 PM 3 3 :55 PM fl :00 PM :OS PM 0 :90 PM 0 :95 i'M 0 :20 PM t) :25 PtVI d :30 PtVI 2 2 :35 i'M 2 . 2 4 :4{l PM 0 '45 PM 2 2 :50 FM 3 3 :55 PM 3 2 2 7 :00 PM 3 2 2. 7 :OS PNI 2 2 2 6 :10, PM 2 2 :1,5 PM 2 2 20 PM 0 25 PM 2 2 4: 30 PM 0 35 PM 2. 2 40 PM .' 4 2 s 45 PM ~~:. 4 50 PM_ 3- 3 55 PM 2 2 a. , Trai#c .Survey Specialrsfs, lrrc. 624 Gardenia .Terrace, l.~elray Beach: Florida 334Q4 Bank Atlantic Drive'Through Queue Observations 3233 NE 14th Str$et Causeway, Pompano Beach, 1=Jorlda 33062 Obsenr~i By.: Osvaldo °JR"Gonzalez' t=riday, pecertiber 9th, 2045 Ba #11 $a #2. Ba 3: Sum i 1:30 AhA 2 2 11.35 AM 2 3 5 -11:40 AM . p 11:45 ANI 0 1'1 :5Q AM p 11 t55 AM 2 2 12:00 PM 0 12:05 PM p 12:10 PM 3 3 12;i5 PM 0 12:20. PW1 p 12:25 PM p 9Z;3Q PM 2 2 42:35 PM 2 2 12:40 PM, 2 2 t 2:95. PM 0 12:50_ PM 2 2 12:55 PM 2 2 it00 PM 0. 3:05 PM 0 1:1U PM 0 1:9 5 J?NI 0_ 1:20 PM 0 1:25 PM 0 3:3U PM 3 2 5. 3:35 PM Z 2. 3:40 l'M p: 3:45 PM 0 3:50 PM : - '_ 5 ; ,;: = 5 3:55 PM 3 3 2: 8 4:1')0 PM 2 2 4:05 PM 2 2 4:1.0 PM 2 2 ?1:35 PM 3. 3 4:.2.0 PM 2 9:25 'PM 0 4:30 PM 2 2 4:35. PM 3 3 4:4a PM 2 2 q:n4..rm 0 4:55. PM 2 2 5:00 Plvl 2 2' 4 5:05 RM 2 2 4 5s10;PM . 3 .. 2 5 5:15.PM 2 2 4 5:20.PM 2 2 5:25 P.M 2 2 5:31) P.M p .5:35. PM . U 5:40'PM 0 5:45 PM 0 5:50 PM 0 5:55 PNI 2 2 ^~/21/200B 14:15 FAa 52126162i6 YBIt89,TILE TRAFFIC -~ LTBG fdj 001 d e~ ~aBtbiN~ J r+ W N O O f+ Q~ Gaff to Bay Blvd e~ O ~ ~° E x ~ ~ a~ --see ~ ~--- e~ o ~ n ~ ~.+° Gulito Bay Hivd ' k Y N A A N P O ~~ tao u~1t cnNpAaaa LIP VtO~~0~~ aa +tn~nwv~n a ap p ON~t N A G~~ 4s ~~ 11 1 WOCnN V W OD ~ V1d OD tD~ W NfD a ~ OD+N W Ntt7aA r of t~i~i~an~ A J O WNV01ON~ ~"~ tR1 ~i~'ig~~~v~, r+ ~;,m.amrn'oamw ~ W +~ C7 N ~ ~ ~ ~ 671W~~N~Om r N'O~af~~CDO ~ Cp w+O W W $CD y ~ wm~w;a,;,o r _ m t1~ nl _$, N_ ~BFi n~.la db Ui .p~7 b~, ., A' a ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~s~ x~ ~_ d 2 i 7 i Y 7 b 's ~ ~ ~ : y a R7 Ci ~!} t! ~ O 7C y z E ~ 7 >' e a . ~ x/21/2006 14:13 FAI 3212618218 ~~ws~ ¢~ /rt~srlJY YfiRSATILS TRAFFIC ~1 ~111e 0 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ LTBC l~ Cj? Y r~ #~ ~~~ o • o~ ~,. 8_ 00 vfTV 1 ~~~ r i,iT T t I~ • w r ~- ~ 002 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~h~~~~ ~~~~~i~ t5..-u ~r~n~~at~~fatoa~ Esr~ine~~~n~ ~4nsu~t~it'fs _- _ res`t - ~~'~~:. r~t:l.~ttfl-cc. - - I.T~fv dli~-Q~~~ - - _ ~E~ ~_:~ ~c~~c~: Utd Ce~act~~far~ ~cf ~~r: G~" ___ ~~~f~'l; l4t.,~'.~.~a dP~.ff fa ~'Z~~f ~~~'~ ~f~lf~~:lt~~. ~~~~~ ~'i.?.#tI:F#~r ~ ''t~i~". LI~t,QtT~~V$i:t~~~: ~?y ~~' I S~ ~~ ~'~4U~~Q~. ~~~ fi,..a.~~~,.. ~nr a //''t~f ~~ $ y^ {,, ~t}Eli2L~> ~tti't~~~aiS ~ .c3Tlii°~. { r ~SJ'. 1: ~~'. ~ p~ y iT'~:=.t' E'~1 ~i.`~1:: ~y ! 11...~'td~ ~ + +7~~~.1 i3~1~: ~~-.~SU[l~(~~.~[~II~S~t'~ ~.~r'~'~ ~Qi"t~t, ~"~`~~' ~Ltt`t1IlttL' ~''.~Cl\'~'CRl.et1_`~ ~li.tttCt!tR'C~` ° ~:~'~ L ~.~~ 3~3 did S~~~c~~R- 4U .It~.P:~l .I, .1 p']: l).7 `l1 ~yry I dEJ _ _..-_.._ ~& T ~ '~ [~'' v .7~ '+.~'Q.Q I~ ti?~~3MY~~4'~i TT ff j~ry~ -._ jj , .a, ~' i ____ ++ ~ { A _ 1 ~~ >f ~ ~i ~ ~''~~ ~: ~ ~ ~~R - - _- ~ 1~4 i ~~3€e'd: ~~} ~1a'~ ~~ ~~ ~~' ~.~ r~'c~t`C ~ =- ~ Sa'C~tfs1f 1T~['rit+~ ~' 1~;~; UAL. '~iTti~~T~1~t~ ~°# ~',.F~+'t. ~~$~. ~'~~ ~~'1~$P!#f~ii ~4~: ~ ~~~ ~«~~'lllii~i~ ~.~ ~t1~~~U'. ~`7i1~' ,~~'~.~~~. _- ~rlli~~~ ~e~1? ~-~I~ ~~c I ,'~~rfl~b~u~r~ ....,M, ~A~-tlb~ta~d t~~:~[~d 4~k~~~ct~~.nd ~~~n~ fnttwr.~~~l __ f_f __ `9_`I~~1~ ~~ _ Lf 'I',~~ u - - _- ~i_ _ - - ~.t. ~7ur~ 1~, ~~~t -- - _ 'T"~ar~.4 _ - _ - - [r.~ _- YY y `t.~'l 4.~...F ~. 1,4 1:~ 1. ~ ~~ -~.1 ~'. 7, ~~~. T :7 `, !Y ` f`, ~4~ ~ ~ 4 g q F ~ AA } pp p 4;~(~ 4:45 ', f ~ ? I3 I..~ 4~a f Ci ~~ ' ~`~ ~~ t3 ~ 44- 4;'4~ S.flQ 12 ~l -t ~~ f ~ ~d~ ' 2~ 4~ 5 1 } 4~~ l t?S l~a«r-1 S~trta ~5 7 5~ ~~4 ' S~ 1`~1. ~3 ~,6~ ~~ 49' C,i~l ~4 ~3 4~4 ~ I,~ 4~ 5;1'. 5:~~3 1~ f~ t~ 4'~ f~, ~5 _5 4~1 ~ 1I. 45'Q' l~1 ~:~~3 ~:45 ~ i ~4 1 ~ ?~ f' I ~ 4~~ ~ 4% ~~ 1 l l ~.4~ f:~l~ I~ 1~ ~8 ~ ~ IG 3~ F~ ~ 43~ ~2 _ _ Ff'c~te~ly Suizi _ --- - 54 -- `~fi - _ 4~ - 1.93 _ ~ 1 ~~ _ l ~~F l ,`~Q E 3`~ 41 - 1 a7~> 4 ~ 1 !'~.id: Hare 4~~~ 5:~~ ~~ ~~ 4 l~~' S~ g~ i'~C 1.~~ , ~ ~~f 44 1_,5'~ 4~4 ~.,~~„ 1f f~"s~'!A .LI~,'E~1S` s~QIIr2I61ii~1"'~~ °'~~~if4i' q ~ ±~ryy FO~~~`~~' S-v1A~ 111,`tifL~[~ ~Q~?~'T .!' i~GF''~ ~:~.~~ iF11` 4:~5 ~c,4~ ~~ i3~ 4~ fps ~~' L4~ f,?3~f ~Q' ~4 f.~,~ 4~4 ~r~a~C 1,4 2f - - ! ~4 --- --- ,i~ - f.~ - -- -- -- - -~ 35 - -- 464 - 9~ - - f;Cr ~4G3~ - -- ~:~~ - - 4Pa ~11~15`: ~ ~.:~~..1~t4 p ~', ~..QQdi) ~~.~~,}~` ~~.~°~41 ~.~~_~~0 1i_~g~i] ~_~~f~ (ry ~q 7`~_f~i~® ~..F3¢1t8 ~~..~'41'li ~~.~~/fd p~se .l.t?.~°dli't ~. r~ r TQ1 1 ~~ ~~ 1.,55? ~ - - - - - ~~t~ t Tc~t~l fife. f f f,943 1 '9G.I ,#~,i;~}~:~''~~° Ttl~'t1~ ~ f ~.3'~,~0 f ~_4~rcF X3'_3°.~0 33.t5°/° 4_?'.5°~° 22..~~ra 9_~'>~'a ~~._4~r`F ' `.~°~e ~_~°.~° ~'~.8~>d° 4_~° Fk ~t° Fa~for Q,~~ ~ f~.5~ Q.~4 0.3~ 4,54 Cf~.S~ - Q.-tG C~.~~ x.53 _ _ ~.~~ f1.~8 Q.39^ __ ~ . ~-ac1Y; _ ~D.~3 _ - x!..55_ ~.~? ~.~~ r ~ ~+II~IC. i~I~l~~ OLiI'1I°IOI~S, Il August 29, 2006 Mr. John Schodtler, Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2006-07043 - 2498 Gulf to Bay Blvd -Engineers # 6009 Dear Mr. Schodtler, 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, Florida 33803-1308 Phone: 863-802-1500 Fax: 863-802-1505 This letter is an explanation answering the environmental comment regarding the use of underground storm water management system. Due to the size of the parcel, the connections of the proposed driveway locations, pedestrian access requirements, along with the required pazking per code and the clients pazking requirements due to their unique standards of operation. We are requesting a waiver of the city's storm water management design requirements as per your comments. The number of parking spaces do exceed the total number required by code. This is due mainly to handle customer parking along with the number of employee spaces required to maintain this facility. Refer to the revised Site Layout Plan; sheet C-3 for the reduced size of the parking stall depth as mentioned in the City Staff's comments. In doing so, we have reduced the square footage of impervious area on site and reduced the impact of the adjacent parking area to the existing 38 inch oak tree scheduled to remain. With the existing large trees remaining and the traffic circulation requirements, the only way the on-site stormwater management system could be accomplished was to propose the StormTech system, putting the pollution abatement and storm attenuation volumes within the trench systems. As per the designed system, the Isolation Chambers noted on the plans are designed to accommodate any trash and silt buildup by being accessible for wash down and collection/removal of the debris. The structures adjacent to the StormTech system are designed to include a sump area to help with the drop out of any silt prior to entering the chamber areas. Therefore, we are requesting approval of the designed stormwater management system as submitted. If you have any questions regarding this request, feel free to contact me during normal office hours in order to expedite the approval process. Sincerely, G Norman D. Grinstead Senior Project Manager ORIGINAL RECEIVED Iti~ Y 0 O 2~DU PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER T.ST FL ~ ~ ~ ~ `V~~1 ~TW ~~~ ~ 0~1 ~ °~Y° - ~~ mater Management District o '7tigC~~~C M Equai Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Ofrice Opportunity Employer 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 3600 West Sovereign Path (863) 534-1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 572-6200 SUNCOM 667-3271 Talmadge G. "Jerry" Rice Chair, Pasco Judith C. Whitehead Vice Chair, Hernando Neil Combee Secretary, Polk Jennifer E. Closshey Treasurer, Hillsborough Edward W. Chance Manatee Thomas G. Dabney Sarasota Heidi B. McCree Hillsborough Sallie Parks Pinellas Todd Pressman Pinellas Maritza Rovira-Forino Hillsborough Patsy C. Symons Desoto David L Moore Executive Director William 5. Bilenky General Counsel September 11, 2006 Leo Murphy, Jr. 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33765 2379 Broad ~t, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, 'Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 Subject: Notice of Final,Agency Action for Approval ERP General for Minor Systems Permit No. 46031388.000 Project Name: Bank Atlantic - 2498 Gulf-to-bay Boulevard County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/Rge: 18/29 S/ 16 E Dear Mr. Murphy: This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statute, (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.C. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 40D-1.1010, F.A.C., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action. in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the permit, and construction must be in accordance with these plans. ORIGINAL RECEIVED P~OV 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPA(~TMEt~q CITY OF CLEARWATEt~ Permit'iJo.: 46031388.000 • Page 2 of 2 ~ September 11, 2006 If you have questions concerning the permit, please contact Michelle L. Maxey, at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2065. For assistance with environmental concerns, please contact Alberto J. Martinez, P.W.S., extension 2007. Sincerely, Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM:MLM:gjn Enclosures: Approved Permit w/Conditions Attached Approved Construction Drawings Statement of Completion Notice of Authorization to Commence Construction Noticing Packet (42.00-039) Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.C. cc/enc: File of Record 46031388.000 William Y. Harrell, P.E., Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. ORIGINAL RECENED ~OV 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SOUTHWEST FLORIDK WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION NO DATE ISSUED: Bank Atlantic - 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard PROJECT NAME Commercial PROJECT TYPE Pinellas COUNTY 18/29S/16E SEC(s)/TV1IP(s)/RGE{s) Leo Murphy, Jr. PERMITTEE 46031388.000 September 11, ?nn~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~J~ ®$ 2~~6 PLANNING DEPARTWIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER L ;'~~Cs ~~~~ Issuing Authority THIS NOTICE SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUSLY DISPLAYED AT THE SITE OF THE WORK 41.00-075 (10/92) • • SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GENERAL FOR MINOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PERMIT NO. 46031388.000 Expiration Date: September 11, 2011 Issue Date: September 11, 2006 This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40D-40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit. PROJECT NAME: Bank Atlantic - 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard GRANTED TO: Leo Murphy, Jr. 2498 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33765 ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a 0.96-acre commercial project and the associated surface water management system. Water quality treatment will be provided via effluent filtration. OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Leo Murphy, Jr. COUNTY: Pinellas SEC/TWP/RGE: 18/29S/16E TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 0.96 ORIGINAL PROJECT SIZE: 0.96 Acre RECENED LAND USE: Commercial ~nw ~ $ 2~~6 DATE APPLICATION FILED: July 13, 2006 PLANNING L7EPARrME NT CITY OF CLEARWATER AMENDED DATE: N/A SPECIFIC CONDITIONS If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums. Permit No.: 46031388.000 ~ Page 2 of 3 ~ September 11, 2006 2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to: Tampa Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 U.S. Highway 301 North Tampa, FL 33637-6759 The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted. 3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction. 4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Tampa Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings. 5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site. 6. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule. For systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration or systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration and retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed 18 months after operation is authorized and every 18 months thereafter. 7. Prior to installation of the filter media, the Permittee's contractor shall submit a certified test of the media to the Permittee's Professional Engineer and the District. The test shall address the following parameters: uniformity coefficient, effective grain size, sieve analysis, percent silts, clays and organic matter, and permeability testing (constant head). If testing indicates the actual permeability rate is less than the value specified in the permitted design, a permit modification will be required to lengthen the effluent filtration system. The Permittee shall also notify the Surface Water Regulation Manager, Tampa Regulation Department, at least 48 hours prior to commencement of construction of the effluent filtration system, so that District staff may observe this construction activity. 8. This permit is issued based upon the Permittee's certification that the surface water management system meets all applicable rules and specifications, including the Conditions for Issuance of Permits provided in Rule 40D-40.301(1), F.A.C. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system. ORIGINAL RECEIVED f~OV 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER Permit ho.: 46031380 Page 3 of 3 ~ September 11, 2006 GENERAL CONDITIONS The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A"are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them. C~~~~L~~~~`2~0 Authorized Signature ORIGINAL RECEIVED SOU 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARINATECr STATEMENT OF COMPLETION AND REQUEST FOR TRANSFER TO OPERATION ENTITY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2379 BROAD STREET ! BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 Within 30 days after completion of construction of the surface water management system, the owner or authorized agent must obtain the original plus one copy of this form and two complete sets of certified as-built drawings for the surface water management system structures and appurtenances. Upon receipt, this Statement of Completion will be reviewed and the system may be inspected for compliance with the approved permit and as-built drawings. The operation phase of this permit is effective when the Statement of Completion form is signed by an authorized District representative. 1. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFORMATION: Permit No.: Project Name: Address: City, State, Zip: County: Permittee: Telephone: ~~ 2. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT (please choose accurately and check only one box): [ ] A. At the time of final inspection, the surface water management system was completed substantially in accordance with the permitted construction plans and information. Any minor deviations from the permitting plans and specifications will not prevent the system from functioning in compliance with the requirements of Chapters 40D-4 and 40D-40, or 40D-45, or 40D-6, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). (The as-built drawings and information submitted to the District shall confum this certification.) [ ] B. At the time of final inspection, the system was NOT completed in substantial conformance with the pemutted construction plans and information. (The registered professional engineer shall describe the deviation(s) in writing, and provide confirming depiction on the as-built drawings and information.) This certification shall be verified by TWO COPIES of attached "as-built" drawings (as-built drawings must be signed, dated and sealed by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor and Mapper, as required by State Law). By: Signature of Engineer of Record • AFFIX SEAL • Date: mmlddlyyyy format Company Address Phone: (_)_ ®RIGINAL City, State, Zip RECEIVED FORM 547.27/SOC (06/00) Rule 40D-1.659, F.A.C. Name (please type) Company Name Fla. P.E. Reg. No. Page 1 of 3 ~~OV 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER 3. NOTIFICATION OF CO~LETION: The District is hereby notified thaT~onstruction of the surface water management system is completed, and the Permittee requests that the surface water management permit be transferred to the legal entity (individual owner or corporation) responsible for operation and maintenance (O&M) as named in Section 4. An authorized agent must submit a letter of authorization from the pemuttee authorizing him or her to execute this Notification. By: Signature of Permittee Name and Title (please type) or Authorized Agent Permit Number Company Name Company Address City, State, Zip 4. AGREEMENT FOR SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY: The below- named legal entity responsible for O&M agrees to operate and maintain the surface water management system in compliance with all pemut conditions and the provisions of Chapter 40D-4 and 40D-40, or 40D-45, or 40D- 6, F.A.C. An authorized agent must submit a letter of authorization from the owner or other legal entity authorizing him or her to execute this agreement. By: Signature of Representative of Acceptable O&M Entity or Authorized Agent Name and Title (please type) Permit Number Name of Owner or Other Acceptable Legal Entity for O&M Address City, State, Zip Phone Date RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER ENTITY ONLY UPON WRITTEN NOTICE AND APPROVAL BY THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 40D- 4.351, F.A.C. AGENCY USE ONLY OPERATION AUTHORIZATION: Based upon the certification by the Engineer of Record in Section 2, and the notice of completion in Section 3, the responsibility for operation and maintenance of the system is transferred to the legal entity named in Section 4, and the operation phase of this permit is effective on the date indicated below. SOUTHWEST FLORH)A WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: Authorized District Representative Name and Title Effective Date Pernut Number ~ IGINAL (Enter month and dav. Iwo-dieits each; andyear.~our dim) RECEIVF~ (1 ~ 'nns FORM 547.27/SOC (06/00) Page 2 of 3 rvV{L PLt4NNING LiEN,~:,,<r,v,~NT CITY OF CLEARVyf.~~fER BUILT DRAWINGS AND INFORMATION C~CKLIST Following is a list of information that is to be verified and submitted by the Engineer of Record in support of the Statement of Completion. 1. On behalf of the permittee, the Engineer shall certify that: a. At the time of final inspection, the surface water management system was completed substantially in accordance with the pemutted construction plans and information. Any minor deviations from the permitting plans and specifications will not prevent the system from functioning in compliance with the requirements of Chapters 40D-4 and 40D-40, or 40D-45, or 40D-6, F.A.C. (The as-built drawings and information submitted to the District shall confirm this certification; or b. At the time of final inspection, the system was NOT completed in substantial conformance with the perntted construction plans and information. (The registered professional engineer shall describe the deviation(s) in writing, and provide confirming depiction on the as-built drawings and information.) 2. The Engineer's certification shall be based upon on-site observation of construction (scheduled and conducted by the professional engineer of record or by a project representative under direct supervision) and review of as-built drawings, with field measurements and verification as needed, for the purpose of determining if the work was completed in accordance with original permitted construction plans, information and specifications. 3. The as-built drawings are to be based on the District permitted construction drawings revised to reflect any changes made during construction. Both the original design and constructed condition must be clearly shown. The plans need to be clearly labeled as "as-built" or "record" drawings. As required by law, all surveyed dimensions and elevations required shall be verified and signed, dated and sealed by a Florida registered professional surveyor and mapper or professional engineer. The following information, at a minimum, shall be verified on the as-built drawings, and supplemental documents if needed: a. Discharge structures -Locations, dimensions and elevations of all, including weirs, orifices, gates, pumps, pipes, and oil and grease skimmers; b. Side bank and underdrain filters, or exfiltration trenches -locations, dimensions and elevations of all, including clean-outs, pipes, connections to control structures and points of dischazge to receiving waters; c. Storage areas for treatment and attenuation -dimensions, elevations, contours or cross-sections of all, sufficient to determine stage-storage relationships of the storage area and the permanent pool depth and volume below the control elevation for normally wet systems; d. System grading -dimensions, elevations, contours, final grades or cross-sections to determine contributing drainage areas, flow directions and conveyance of runoff to the system discharge point(s); e. Conveyance -dimensions, elevations, contours, final grades or cross-sections of systems utilized to divert off-site runoff around or through the new system; f. Water levels -existing water elevation(s) and the date determined; g. Benchmark(s) -location and description (minimum of one per major water control structure); and h. Wetland mitigation or restoration areas -Show the plan view of ali areas, depicting a spatial distribution of plantings conducted by zone (if plantings are required by permit), with a list showing all species planted in each zone, numbers of each species, sizes, date(s) planted and identification of source of material; also provide the dimensions, elevations, contours and representative cross-sections depicting the construction. 4. Submit the final subdivision plat or other legal documents, as recorded in the county public records, showing dedicated rights-of--way, easement locations and special use areas that aze reserved for water management purposes and continuing operation and maintenance. 5. Additional information will be shown on the as-built drawings or otherwise provided as needed to verify and support the Statement of Completion (example: home owners association final documents, and other items required by permitting conditions.) FORM 547.27/SOC (06/00) Page 3 of 3 e .~'- SOUt~1~St Florida 2379 Broad Str~rooksville, Florida 34604-6899 mater Management District (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) E '~ SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD.only 1-800.231-6103 (FL only) ~` ~- on the Internet at: WaterMatters.org • An ~ Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office Sarasota Service Office Tampa Service Office ~~ 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 6750 Frultville Road . 7601 Highway 301 Borth Bartow, Florida 33830.7700 3600 West Sovereign Path Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 Tampa, Florida 33637.5759 (863) 534.1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (941) 377.3722 or (813) 985.7481 or 1-800.492-7862 (FL only) (352) 527.8131 iS00.3243503 (FL only) i-800.838.0797 (FL only). . • SUNCOM 572•&200 SUNCOM 6673271 SUNCOM 531.6900 SUNCOM 578-2070 Heidi B. McCrea Chair, Hillsborough NOTICING PACKET PUBLICATION INFORMATION ' Talmadge 0. °Jerry• Rice ! ` • Vice Chair, Pasco , Peuyc. symons PLEASE SEE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS NOTICE FOR A LIST OF secretary, Desoto FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) Judith C. Whitehead Treasurer, Hernando Edward W, Chance The District's action regarding the issuance or denial.of a permit, a petition or qualifica#ion for Manatee an exemption only becomes closed to future legal challenges #rom members of the public Jennifer E. Closshey ("third parties"), if 1.) "third parties" have been properly notified of the District's action Hillsborough regarding the permit or exemption, and 2.) no "third party" objects to the District's action "e" CO11~k within a specific period of time following the notification.. • Thomas 0. Dabney sarasota Noification of "third parties" is provided through publication of certain information in a Sallie Parks newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties where the proposed activities are Pinellas to occur. Publication of notice informs "third parties" of their right to challenge the District's ToddPrsssman action. If proper notice is provided by publication, "third parties" have a 21-day time limit in Pinellas Maritza RovUa-Porlno which to file a petition opposing the District's action. A shorter 14-day time limit applies to Hillsborough District action regarding Environmental Resource Permits linked with an authorization to use Sovereign Submerged Lands. However, if no notice to "third parties" is published; there is no time limit to a party's right to challenge the District's action. The District has not published a David L Moore notice to "third parties" that it has taken or intends to take final action on your application. If Executive Director you want to ensure that the period of #ime in which a petition opposing the District's action fiche J1. Heath regarding your application is limited to the time frames stated above, you may publish, at Assistant Executive Director your.own expense, a notice in a newspaper of general circulation. A copy of the Notice of wllllam S. ellenky A enc A p g p g General Counsel 9 Y ction the District uses for ublication and uidelines for ublishin are included in this packet. Guidelines for Publishing a Notice of Agency Action 1. Prepare a notice for publication in the newspaper. The District's Notice of Agency Action, included with this packet; contains all of the information that is required for proper noticing. However, you .are responsible for ensuring that the form and the content of your notice comply with the applicable statutory provisions. 2. Your notice must be published in accordance with Chapter 50, Florida Statutes. A copy of the statute is enclosed. 3. Select a newspaper that is appropriate considering the location of the .activities proposed in your application, and contact the newspaper for further information regarding their procedures for publishing. 4. You only need to publish the notice for one day. ORIGINAL 5. Obtain an "affidavit of publication" from the newspaper after your notice is published. RECEIVED 6. Immediately upon receipt send the ORIGINAL affidavit to the District at the address below, forthe #ile of record. Retain a-copy of the affidavit for your records. ~1~~ ~ 8 ZUU6 Southwest Florida Water Management District Records and Data Supervisor PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2379 Broad Street CITv O~ ~f.EAR1~ATf"R Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 Note: If you are advertising a notice of the District's proposed action, and the District's final action is different, publication of an additional notice may be necessary to prevent future legal challenges. If you need additional assistance, please contact us at ext. 4360, at the Brooksville number listed above. (Your question may be on the FAQ list). • 42.00-039 (Rev 03/06) . .. / FAQ ABOUT NOTICING. 1. Q, Do I have to do this noticing, and what is this notice foi? A. You do not have to do this noticing. You need to publish a notice if you want to ensure that a "third party" cannot challenge the District's action on your permit, exemption, or petition at some future date. If you choose not to publish, there is no time limit to a third party's right to challenge the District's action. 2. Q. What do i need to send to the newspaper? A. The enclosed one page notice form entitled "Notice of Final Agency Action (or Proposed Agency Action) By The Southwest Florida Water Management District." You must fill in the blanks before sending it. 3. Q. Do I have to use the notice form, or can' I make up my own form? ~, A. You do not have to use our form. However, your notice must contain all information that is in the form. .~ 4. Q. Do I send the newspaper the whole form (one page) or just the top portion that has blanks? A. Send the full page form which includes the NOTICE OF RIGHTS section on the bottom half, . . 5. Q. Do 1 type or print the information in the blanks? Or will the newspaper fill in the blanks? •~- A. You are required to fill in the blanks on the form before sending it to the newspaper. Contact your selected newspaper for instructions on printing or typing the information in the blanks. 6. Q. The section 50.051, F.S. (enclosed) proof of publication form of uniform affidavit has blanks in the text. Do I fill in these blanks and send that to the newspaper? A. No. That section shows the affidavit the newspaper will send you. They will fill in the blanks. . w, .. -, 7. Q. If someone objects, is my permit or exemption no good? A. If you publish a notice and a "third ,party" fifes a request for administrative hearing within the allotted time, the matter is referred to an administrative.hearing. While the case is pending, generally, you may not proceed with activities under the challenged. agency action. When the hearing is complete, the administrative law judge's (A~J) recommendation is returned to the District Governing Board, and the Governing Board will take final action on the ALJ's recommendation. There is no time limit fora "third party" to object and file a request for administrative hearing if you do not publish a notice. 8. Q. 1 don't understand what !should put in the blanks on the Notice form? A. 1. County, Section/7'ownship/Range, application No., permit No., proposed permit No., petition No., Exemption No., or permit inquiry No. is on your Permit, Petition, Exemption, or Denial document. 2. Permit Type or Application Type is Environmental Resource Permit, Water Use Permit, Work of the District, etc. 3. # of Acres is the project acres. This is listed on the Environmental Resource Permit documents. For Water Use Permits, Exemptions, etc., you may put "Not Applicable" if unknown. 4. Rule or Statute reference (Exemptions only). The rule and/or statute reference is at the top of page one in the reference line of the Exemption. For all others, put "Not Applicable" in this blank. b. Type of Project describes your project activity. Environmental Resource Permit =Agriculture, Commercial, Government, Industrial, Mining, Road Projects, Residential, Semi-Public or Water Quality Treatment. Water Use Permit =Agricultural (if irrigating, state that it is irrigation and specify what is being irrigated), industrial Commercial, Recreation Aesthetic, Mining Dewatering, or~Public Supply.. Work. of the District= pipeline, etc. 6. Project Name is the name of your project, if applicable. If there is no project name, put "Not Applicable" in this blank. ORIGINAL RECEIVED I~~V 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 42.00-039 (Rev 03/06) NOTICE OF FINAL AGENCY AC~N BY THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Notice is given that the District's Final Agency Action is approval of the on acres to serve known as . ,, The project is located in County, Section(s) ' ' ~~~ Township South, Range East.. The permit app~c . ~ . ~ RECEIVED - is whose address is ~ ~~r~1a n o ~r ~6 The permit No. is PIAiVNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The file(s) pertaining to the project referred to above is available for inspection Monday through Friday except for legal holidays, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Southwest Florida Water Manage- ment District (District) NOTICE OF RIGHTS Any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding this permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or final action; (2) state all material facts disputed by each person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts; and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.C. A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address, 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 within 21 days of publication of this notice (or withinl4 days #or an Environmental Resource Permit With Proprietary. Authorization fqr the use of Sovereign Sub- merged Lands). Failure to fil@ ~•regq~st for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57,F.S. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the District's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice of final agency action. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the District on the application have the right to petition to become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's final action in #his matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. 42.00-039 (Rev 03/06) - .' ,.. _w..,.. .. ,. ~ _~.. ~..." CHAPTER 50, FLORIDA STATUTES ®RIGINAL LEGAL AND OFFICIAL ADVERTISEMENTS RECEIVED 50.011 Where and in what language legal notices to be published. ~~~v Q 8 2006 50.021 Publication when no newspaper in county. 50.031 Newspapers in which legal notices and process maybe published. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 50.041 Proof of publication; "uniform affidavits.required. CIZIf OF CLEARWATER 50.051 " Proof of publication; form of uniform affidavit. , 50.061 Amounts chargeable. 50.071 Publication costs; court docket fund. - ~, ; 50.011 Where and in what language legal notices to be published. Wi~enever by statute an official or legal advertisement or a publication, or notice in a newspaper has been or is directed or permitted in the nature of or in lieu of process, or for constructive service, or in initiating, assuming, reviewing, exercising or enforcing jurisdiction or power, or for any purpose, including all legal notices and advertisements of sheriffs and tax collectors, the contemporaneous and continuous intent and meaning of such legislation all arid singular, existing or repealed, is and has been and is hereby declared to be and to have been, and the rule of interpretation is and has been, a publication in a newspaper printed and published periodically once a week or oftener, containing at least 25 percent of its words in the English language, entered or qualified to be admitted and entered as'seoond-class matterat a post office in the county where published, for sale to the public generally, available to the public generally for the publication of official or other notices and customarily containing information of a public character or of interest or of value to the residents or owners of property in the county where published, or of interest or of value to the general public. History.: s. 2, ch. 3022, 1877; RS 1296; GS 1727; s. 1, ch. 5610, 1907; RGS 2942; s. 1, ch. 12104, 1927; CGL 4666,4901; s.:1, ch. 63-387; s. 6, ch. 67-254. `' Note: Redesignated as "Periodicals" by the United States Postal Service, see 61 F.R. 10123-10124, March 12, 1996. Note.-Formers. 49.01. 50.021 Publication.when no newspaper in county.-- ; , .: ; . When any law, ororder or decree of court, shall direct advertisements to be made in any counry.and there be no newspaper~,published in the said county, the advertisement may be made by posting three copies thereof in three different places in said county, one of which shall be at the front door of the .courthouse, and by publication in the nearest county in which a newspaper is published. - ~ - History: RS 1297; GS 1728; RGS 2943; CGL 4667; s. 6, ch. 67-254. Note: Former s. 49.02. 50.031 Newspapers in which legal notices and process may be published.- No notice or publication required to be published in a newspaper in the nature of or in lieu;of process of any kind, nature, character or description provided for under any law of the state, whether heretofore or hereafter enacted, and whether pertaining to constructive service, or the initiating, assuming, reviewing, exercising or enforcing jurisdiction or power, by any court in this state, or any notice of sale of property, real or personal, for taxes, state, county or municipal,"or sheriffs, guardian's or administrator's or any sale made pursuant to any judicial order, decree or statute or any other publication or notice pertaining :to any affairs. of the state, or any.county, .municipality or other political subdivision thereof, shall be deemed to have been published in accordance with the statutes providing for such publication; unless the same shall have been published for the prescribed period of time required forsuch publication, in a newspaperwhich at the time of such publication shall have been in existence for 1 year and shall have been entered as 'second-class mail matter at a post office in the county where published, or in a newspaper which is a direct successor of a newspaper which together have been so .published; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall apply wherein any county there shall be no newspaper in existence which shall have been published for the length of time above prescribed. No legal publication of any kind, nature or description, as herein defined, shall be valid~or binding or held to be in compliance with the statutes providing for such publication unless the same shall have been published in accordancewiih the provisions of this section. Proof of such publication shall be made by uniform affidavit. History: ss. 1-3, ch. 14830, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 4274(1); s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 74-221. Note: Redesignated as "Periodicals" by the United States Postal Service, see 61 F.R. 10123-10124, March 12, 1996. - Note.yFormer s.49.03. _ 50.041 Proof of publication; uniform affidavits required.- (1)All affidavits of publishers of newspapers (ortheir official. representatives) made for the purpose of establishing proof of publication of public notices or legal advertisements shall be uniform throughout the state. (2) Each such affidavit shall be printed upon white bond papercontaining at least 25 percent rag material and shall be 8~/z inches in width and of convenient length, not less than 5~/z inches. A white margin of not less than 2~/z inches shall be left at the right side of each affidavit form and upon or in this space shall be substantially pasted a clipping which shall be a true copy of the public notice or legal advertisement for which proof is executed. (3) In all counties having a population in excess of 450,000 according to the latest official decennial census, in addition to the charges which are now or may hereafter be established bylaw for the publication of every official notice or legal advertisement, there may be a charge not to exceed $2 for the preparation and execution of each such proof of publication or publisher's affidavit. History.~s. 1, ch. 19290, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4668(1); s. 1, ch. 63-49; s. 26, ch. 67-254.; s. 1, ch. 76-58. Note.~Former s. 49.04. 50.051 Proof of publication; form of uniform affidavit. _ The printed form upon which all such affidavits establishing proof of publication are to be executed shall be substantially as follows: 42.00-039 (Rev 03/06) ®RIGlNAL RECEIVED • ~i~U~ 0 8 2006 NAME OF NEWSPAPER Published (Weekly or Daily) PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Town or City) (County) FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Before the undersigned authority personally appeared ,who on oath says that he or she is of the , a newspaper published at in County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the• matter of in the Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said is a newspaper published at , in said County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said County, Florida, each and has been entered as second-class mail matter at the post office in , in said County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the firsf publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of , 19_, by ,who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. (Signature of Notary Public) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) (Notary Public) History: s. 2, ch. 19290, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4668(2); s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 93-62; s. 291, ch. 95-147. ~Note.~Redesignated as "Periodicals" by the United States Postal Service, see 61 F.R. 10123-10124, March 12, 1996. Note: Former s. 49.05. 50.061 Amounts chargeable. (1) The publisher of any newspaper publishing any and all official public notices or legal advertisements shall charge therefore the rates specified in this section without rebate, commission or refund. (2) The charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 70 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 40 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion, except that: (a) In all counties having a population of more than 304,000 according to the latest official decennial census, the charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 80 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 60 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion. (b) In all counties having a population of more than 450,000 according to the latest official decennial census, the charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 95 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 75 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion. (3) Where the regular established minimum commercial rate per square inch of the newspaper publishing such official public notices or legal advertisements is in excess of the rate herein stipulated, said minimum commercial rate per square inch may be charged for all such legal advertisements or official public notices for each insertion, except that a governmental agency publishing an official public notice or legal advertisement may procure publication by soliciting and accepting written bids from newspapers published in the county, in which case the specified charges in this section do not apply. (4) All official public notices and legal advertisements shall be charged and paid for on the basis of 6-point type on 6-point body, unless otherwise specified by statute. (5) Any person violating a provision of this section, either by allowing or accepting any rebate, commission, or refund, commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 ors. 775.083. (6) Failure to charge the rates prescribed by this section shall in no way affect the validity of any official public notice or legal advertisement and shall not subject same to legal attack upon such grounds. History: s. 3, ch. 3022, 1877; RS 1298; GS 1.729; RGS 2944; s. 1, ch. 12215, 1927; CGL 4668; ss. 1, 2, 2A, 2B, ch. 20264, 1941; s. 1, ch. 23663, 1947; s. 1, ch. 57-160; s. 1, ch. 63-50; s. 1, ch. 65-569; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 15, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 73-332; s. 1, ch. 90-279. Note.yFormer s. 49.06. 50.071 Publication costs; court docket fund. (1) There is established tr-.J3roward, pade and:Duyal Counties a court docket for the purpose of paying the cost of the publication of the fact of the filing of any ciy~ssase m the,dreuit court in those counties by their co4Nles by thq~r style and of the calendar relating to such cases. A newspaper qualifie~rptnder thea7,ecns o/ s. 50.011 shall be designated as the record n~spaper for sucfi publication by an order of a majority of the judges in the,j~iiicial circuit lnwhich the subject county is located and such order shaM~be filed~,and,recorded with the clerk of the circuit court for the subject county. The court docket fund shall be funded by a service charge of $1 added to the filing fee for all civil actions, suits, or proceedings filed in 4he circuit court of the subject county. Theclerk of the circuit court shall maintain such funds separate and apart, and the aforesaid fee shall not be diverted to any other fund or for any purpose other than that established herein. The clerk of the circuit court shall dispense the fund to the designated record newspaper in the county on a quarterly basis. The designated record newspaper may be changed at the end of any fiscal year of the county by a majority vote of the judges of the judicial circuit of the county so ordering 30 days prior to the end of the fiscal year, notice of which order shall be given to the previously designated record newspaper. (2) The board of county commissioners or comparable or substituted authority of any county in which a court docket fund is not specifically established in subsection (1) may, by local ordinance, create such a court docket fund on the same terms and conditions as established in subsection (1 ). (3) The publishers of any designated record newspapers receiving the court docket fund established in subsection (1) shall, without charge, accept legal advertisement for the purpose of service of process by publication under s. 49.011(4), (10), and (11) when such publication is required of persons authorized to proceed as insolvent and poverty-stricken persons under s. 57.081. History: s. 1, ch. 75-206. 42.00-039 (Rev 03/06) EXHIBIT "A" All activities shall be implemented asset forth in the plans, specifications and performance criteria as approved by this permit. Any deviation from the permitted activity and the conditions for undertaking that activity shall constitute a violation of this permit. 2. This permit or a copy thereof, complete with all conditions, attachments, exhibits, and modifications, shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. The complete permit shall be available for review at the work site upon request by District staff. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this permit. ` 3. "~ For general permits authorizing incidental site activities, the following limiting general conditions shall also apply: a. If the decision to issue the associated individual permit is not final within 90 days of issuance of the incidental site activities permit, the site must be restored by the permittee within 90 days after notification by the District. Restoration must be completed by re-contouring the disturbed site to previous grades and slopes re-establishing and maintaining suitable vegetation and erosion control to provide stabilized hydraulic conditions. The period for completing restoration may be extended if requested by the permittee and determined by the District to be warranted due to adverse weather conditions or other good cause. In addition, the permittee shall iristitute stabilization measures for erosion and sediment control as soon as practicable, but in no case more than 7 days after notification by the District. b. The incidental site activities are commenced at the permittee's own risk. The Governing Board will not consider the monetary costs associated with the incidental site activities or any potential restoration costs in making its decision to approve or deny the individual environmental resource permit application. Issuance of this permit shall not in any way be construed as commitment to issue the associated individual environmental resource permit. 4. Activities approved by this permit shall be conducted in a manner which does not cause violations of state water quality standards. The permittee shall implement best management practices for erosion and a pollution control to prevent violation of state water quality standards. Temporary erosion control shall be implemented prior to and during construction, and permanent control measures shall be completed within 7 days of any construction activity. Turbidity barriers shall be installed and maintained at all locations where the possibility of transferring suspended solids into the receiving waterbody exists due to the permitted work. Turbidity barriers shall remain in place at all locations until construction is completed and soils are stabilized and vegetation has been established. Thereafter the permittee shall be responsible for the removal of the barriers. The permittee shall correct any erosion or shoaling that causes adverse impacts to the water resources. Water quality data for the water discharged from the permittee's property or into the surface waters of the state shall by subrrutted to the District as r~guired by the permit. Analyses shall be performed according to procedures ~utlfied it;l,the Current edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater by the American Public H~fth A~soclatton or thods :tor Chemical Anal SeS 9f ter Wastes b the U.S. Environmental Y ~; Y Pwtecttgll Agerticy. If Water gyality data are required, the permittee shalt oxide data as required on volumes of ~-,.; yyater discharged, incluc)ng tg1a1 volume dispharged duck the days of s~npling.and,tc-tal,monthly volume dis- charged from the property or into surface waters of the state. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~! 0 8 2006 ERP General Conditions Individual (Construction, Conceptual, Mitigation Banks), General, PLANNING DEIyARTMENT Incidental Site Activities, Minor Systems CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 3 41.00-023{03/04) i ,J~ • 15. This permit is valid only for the specific processes, operations and designs indicated on the approved drawings or exhibits submitted in support of the permit application. Any substantial deviation from the approved drawings, exhibits, specifications or permit conditions, including construction within the total land area but outside the approved project area(s), may constitute grounds for revocation or enforcement action by the District, unless a modification has been applied for and approved. Examples of substantial deviations include excavation of ponds, ditches or sump areas deeper than shown on the approved plans. 16. The operation phase of this permit shall not become effective until the permittee has complied with the ' requirements of the conditions herein, the District determines the system to be in compliance with the permitted plans, and the entity approved by the District accepts responsibility for operation and maintenance of the system. s , The permit may not be transferred to the operation and maintenance entity approved by the District until the operation phase of the permit becomes effective. Following inspection and approval of the permitted system by the District, the permittee shall request transfer of the permit to the responsible operation and maintenance entity approved by the District, if different from the permittee. Until a transfer is approved by the District, the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the terms of the permit. 17. Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the permitted system, the District shall be notified of the changes prior to implementation so that a determination can be made whether a permit modification is required. 18. This permit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any required federal, state, local and special District authorizations including a determinatiori of the proposed activities' compliance with the applicable comprehensive plan prior to the start of any activity approved by this permit. 19. This permit does not convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any property right, or any interest in real property, nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property which is not owned or controlled by the permittee, or convey any rights or privileges other than those specified in the permit and Chapter 40D-4 or Chapter 40D-40, F.A.C. 20. The permittee shall hold and save the District harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities which may arise by reason of the activities authorized by the permit or any use of the permitted system. 21. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the permit application, including plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be considered binding unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal determination under section 373.421(2), F.S., provides otherwise. 22. The permittee shall notify the District in writing within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of ownership or control of the permitted system or the real property at which the permitted system is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of a permit are subject to the requirements of Rule 40D-4.351, F.A.C. The permittee t~i~isferring the permit shall remain liable for any corrective actions that may be required as a result of any permit violations prior to such sale, conveyance or other transfer. 23. (ilpon.reasonablenobce to the p~~,nittee, District authorized;yaff witty proper identification shall have permission to inter, inspect, sample and test the system to insure conformity with ~is,#xict s~?~e. regulations and conditions of the permits. 24. If historical pr archaeological artifacts are discovered at any time on the project site, the permittee shall immediately notify the District and'the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources. 25. The permittee shall immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted information that is later discovered to be inaccurate. ERP General Conditions Individual (Construction, Conceptual, Mitigation Banks), General, ORIGINAL Incidental Site Activities, Minor Systems RECEIVED Page 3 of 3 P~OV 0 8 2006 41.00-023{03104) PLANNING DEPARTrviENT ~;ITy CAF CLEARWATER • ~ ~ ~ . 6. District staff must be notified in advance of any proposed construction dewatering. If the' dewatering activity is likely to result in offsite discharge or sediment transport into wetlands or surface waters, a written dewatering plan must either have been submitted and approved with the permit application or submitted to the District as a permit prior to the dewatering event as a permit modification. A water use permit may be required prior to any use ' exceeding the thresholds in Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C. 7. Stabilization measures shall be initiated for erosion and sediment control on disturbed areas as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no • case more than 7 days after the construction activity in that portion of the si#e has temporarily or permanently ceased. 4 8. .~ Off-site discharges during construction and development shall be made only through the facilities authorized by this permit. Water discharged from the project shall be through structures having a mechanism suitable for regulating upstream stages. Stages may be subject to operating schedules satisfactory to the District. 9. The permittee shall complete construction of all aspects of the surface water management system, including wetland compensation (grading, mulching, planting), water quality treatment features, and discharge control facilities prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the development being served by this system. 10: 'The following shall be properly abandoned and/or removed in accordance with the applicable regulations: a. Any existing wells in the path of construction shall be properly plugged and abandoned by a licensed well contractor. b. Any existing septic tanks on site shall be abandoned at the beginning of construction. c. Any existing fuel storage tanks and fuel pumps shall be removed at the beginning of construction. 11. All surface water management systems shall be operated to conserve water in order to maintain environmental quality and resource protection; to increase the efficiency of transport, application and use; to decrease waste; to minimize unnatural runoff from the property and to minimize dewatering of offsite property. 12. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of activity authorized by this permit, the permittee shall submit to the District a written notification, of commencement indicating the actual start date and the expected completion date. 13. Each phase or independent portion of the permitted system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to the occupation of the site or operation of site infrastructure located within the area served by that portion or phase of the system. Each phase or independent portion of the system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to transfer of responsibility for pperation and maintenance of that phase or portion of the system to a local government or other responsible entity. 14. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the permittee shall submit a written Statecr~eM pt completion and ceMlA,ca~on by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authoriza~ by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completioq and Realest for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified In Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C. Additionally, if deviation from the aplp~rad drawings are discovered during the certification process the certification must be accompanied by a ~k ~f the approved permi,# drawings with deviations noted. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~`~)!/ ~ 8 2006 PLANNING DEppRI-IVt[:NT ERP General Conditions CITY CF CL~RWATI:R Individual (Construction, Conceptual, Mitigation Banks), General, Incidental Site Activities, Minor Systems ' Page 2 of 3 41.00-023{03/04) PART II HEARINGS IlWOLVING DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT 28-106.201 Initiation of Proceedings. (1) Unless otherwise provided by statute, initiation of proceedings shall be made by written petition to the agency responsible for rendering final agency action. The term "petition" includes any document that requests an evidentiary proceeding and asserts the existence of a disputed issue of material fact. Each petition shall be legible and on 8'/z by 11 inch white paper. Unless printed, the impression shall be on one side of the paper only and lines shall be double-spaced. (2) All petitions filed under these rules shall contain: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner, the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation ofhow the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. (3) Upon receipt of a petition involving disputed issues of material fact, the agency shall grant or deny the petition, and if granted shall, unless otherwise provided by law, refer the matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings with a request that an administrative law judge be assigned to conduct the hearing. The request shall be accompanied by a copy of the petition and a copy of the notice of agency action. (4) A petition shall be dismissed if it is not in substantial compliance with subsection (2) of this rule or it has been untimely filed. Dismissal of a petition shall, at least once, be without prejudice to petitioner's Sling atimely -amended petition curing the defect, unless it conclusively appears from the face of the petition that the defect cannot be cured. (5) The agency shall promptly give written notice to all parties of the action taken on the petition, shall state with particularity its reasons if the petition is not granted, and shall state the deadline for filing as amended petition if applicable. Specific Authority 120.54(3), (S) F.S. Law Implemented 120.54(5), 120.569, 120.57 F.S. Histor~New 4-1-97, Amended 9-17-98. PART III PROCEEDINGS AND HEARINGS NOT INVOLVIIVG DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT 28-106301 Initiation of Proceedings (1) Initiation of a proceeding shall be made by written petition to the agency responsible for rendering final agency action. The term "petition" includes any document which requests a proceeding. Each petition shall be legible and on 8 '/: by 11 inch white paper or on a form provided by the agency. Unless printed, the impression shall be on one side of the paper only and lines shall be double-spaced. (2) All petitions filed under these rules shall contain: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if ]mown; (b) The name, address, and' telephone number of the petitioner, the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation ofhow the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (e) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; and (f) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. (3) if the petition does not set forth disputed issues of material fact, the agency shall refer the matter to the presiding officer designated by the agency with a request that the matter be scheduled for a proceeding not involving disputed issues of material fact. The request shall be accompanied by a copy of the petition and a copy of the notice of agency action. (4) A petition shall be dismissed if it is not in substantial compliance with subsection (2) of this Rule or it has been untimely filed. Dismissal of a petition shall, at least once, be without prejudice to petitioner's Sling a timely amended petition curing the defect, unless it conclusively appears from the face of the petition that the defect cannot be cured. (5) The .agency shall .promptly give written notice to all parties of the action taken on the petition, shall state with particularity its reasons if the petition is not granted, and shall state the deadline for filing an amended petition if applicable. Specific Authority 120.54{S) F.S. Law Implemented 120.54(5), 120.569, 120.57 F.S. Histor}~-New 4-1-97, Amended 9-17-98. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~0~ 0 81006 PL4NNING DEPARTMENT a2.oo-o2s (1 oiss) CITY OF CLEARWATER ~: .~ .. • } ppr Y i ~3~~1 ~'~ ~„ ~ ~ tf ~i ; 3~ ..t(C ~i ^.I :~i€~~C_ClfifJ~` fi ~~dl't[i1ilC~ ~' ~r'~ l , ~~~ __ MEMORANDUM RECENED TO: Sandra Owens OCT 1 7 ZO~~ FROM: Joseph T. Roviaro, AICP DATE: October 10, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Bank Atlantic CIiY ~ CLEARWATER LTEC Ns 06-3201 Per the City of Clearwaters request, I have revised the analysis to only assume a 30% pass-by reduction for the bank. The affected Table 2, Table 4 (the weighted trip worksheet is also included) and Figure 4 are attached. I also reran the intersection analysis with the revised assignment (copies of the HCS worksheets are also attached). The projected Levels of Service and delay for the study intersections are as follows: Traffic Average Intersection Control LOS Delay (sec/veh) Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Old Coachman Road Signal D 43.2 Old Coachman Road and Project Entrance A STOP A//B' 8.2//13.7' Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Project Entrance B STOP B 2 11.9 z ' Major Street NB Left Turn Movements // Minor Street EB Movements 2 Minor Street SB Right Turn Movement As can be seen, the revised intersection analysis shows a minor change in the amount of delay and the LOS letter grade does not change. Please call if you have any questions. C:ILTECI06LTECProject13201 Bank AtlanticAdditional.wpd o~roae.ro,zoo6 Page 1 Of 23 [ ~, : , po bCrrr X71 i 5~t+, 9~E-1 SSfi • ~ ; ~ . ~ ?rlar~dta flcsricfa ~2€i(71 C r~t~~ann) ~~I *~3.3 8055 (fax; ~; -, ; °;'~~2 TABLE 2 Estimated Trip Generation (.1) • ITi: Tri. Generation Rates. Total Tri Volumes Land Use PM Peak Hour PM-Peak Hour Land Use Size Code l .2 Daily Total In Out Daily Total In Out Existing; Land.: Use Gas Station 6 VFP 944 ! R 16&:56 T3.86 693 6:93 1;011 84 42 42 Pass-by trips (3) New Net (Primary) Trips 425 .586 3'.6 48 18 24 1_8 24 Proposed Land Use' Drive-in Bank 4,.1.00 SF 91'2 / .R 246.49 45.74 22.87 22:87 1.,01.1 188 94 94 Pass-tiy trips (3): Nero Net (Primary) Trips 303 7.U$ S6 132' 28 66 28 66 Increase / (Decrease) 1.22 84 42 42 (1) Trip GeneratiomRates from 7th Edition ofITE Ti•lp Generation Repart, 2003: (2) R = Ai~erage Trip Rate. per I~ehtcle.Fuelirtg Posrtioh or A~=er•age Ti•ip Rate per 1; 000 Square Feet (3) Puss•b}• Percentage fi•otn ITE "Trip Generation ffandboak, "Jane 200A. Chapter 3, Table 5.?8 Land Ilse 944' - 42% Gity-bf CleanaaYec Pass-by °/o - 30% TABLE 4 PROJECTED 2007 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Meets Roadway # Of Background Project Total Adopted. Segment . Lanes Trips (1) Trips (2) Trips LOS: :LOS Gulf to Bay Boulevard EB WB EB WB EB WB Keene Rd to US 19 (2) 6LD 1.,894 2,334 15 15 1,909 .2,349 C Yes Old Coachman Road. NB SB NB SB NB SB Drew St to Gulf'to Bay Blvd 2L .624 329 8 $ 632 337 D Yes (I) From Table 3 (2) Project traps shown are the increase to New 1Yet tPrrniatvJ1'rips: (3j Projeet Trips represent: weighted a~olrunes..See tlppendiz D for x~orlsheet C.•ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~roner to. zoo6 Page 2 Of 23 • Legend: 000+{000)=000 Total Traffic Project Traffic Beckgtouird Ttaffic 328+{0)=328 2+(12)4 BanK Atlantic. site N 12+(20)=32 '~- 4+{5)=9 ~{ =--1;986+(4)=1,990 2+(12)=14~ 14+(34)=48 -~ 199+{29)=228 58+(1)=59 85+(4)=89 N W '~ E s not to scale 1,894+(24)-1,918-~ Gulf to Bay Blvd: luke transportation engineering consultants 120+{24)=144 ~ 1,743+(0)=1,743 -~ 31+(0)=31 ~ n LJ 624+(0)=624 22+{49)=71 t1 442+{24)=466 .~ 1,846+(5)=1,851 ,~- 45+(0)=45 ~ r' 44+(0)=44 84+(1)=85 59{0)=59 Bank Atlantic (-'Projected I'.1VI. Peak .Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3 C: ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~rone~ ro, zooc Page 3 Of 23 • Weighted Proiect Trips worksheet Segment Length Weighted Length Project Times Project Ro~dwa Se meat Feet Tri s Tri s Tri s Gulf to Bay Boulevard Eastbound Keene Rd to Old Coachman Rd 9,28:5.Q 15 139,275.0 Old Coachman Rd to LJS 19 1,263.0. 18' 22 734.0 Total 10,548.0: 162,009.0 15 Gulf o Bay Boulev=ard Westbound Keene Rd to Qld Coaehtnan Rd 9;285.0 15 139;275:0 Old Coachman Rd to LTS 19 1.:263.0 18 22.734.0 :Total 1 Q.,54:8.0 162.;Qg9:0 15 C: ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additio~zal.wpd ocmae. io, zoo6 Page 4 of 23 • HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: JTR Inter.: GtB & OC Agency: LTEC Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/10/06 Jurisd: Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips (Revised) E/W St: Gulf to Bay Boulevard N/S St: Old Coachman Road ____SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ----------------- -------------------- I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R L T R L T R L T R I -------------- I ------------ I -------------1----------- I No. Lanes I 1 3 1 I 1 3 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1149 1749 31 195 1851 966 159 85 44 1228 59 89 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 0 0 0 I 0 ------ ---------- --------------------- - Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations -------------- ------------------------- Phase Combination 1 2 3 9 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Shru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds X I .Peds WB Le£t A A SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds X I Peds x NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 59.0 8.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ___ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS --------------------------- Eastbound L 180 1770 0.83 0.60 60.1 E T 2401 4883 0.76 0.99 26.1 C 28.5 C R 778 1583 0.09 0.99 15.8 B Westbound L 180 1770 0.26 0.60 17.2 B TR 2396 9772 1.03 0.99 56.8 E 56.1 E Northbound L 256 1228 0.29 0.21 90.1 D TR 368 1768 0.37 0.21 91.3 D 40.9 D Southbound L 350 1770 0.68 0.32 92.9 D TR 536 1699 0.29 0.32 31.1 C 38.2 D Intersection Delay = 93.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~mne, io, zoos pag0 $ Of 23 • HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: JTR Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 10/10/06 Analysis Time Peziod: PM Peak Hour Intersection: GtB & OC Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Clearwater Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips (Revised) E/W St: Gulf to Bay Boulevard N/S St: Old Coachman Road VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R L T R L T R I L T R I I I I Volume 1194 1749 31 195 1851 466 159 85 94 1228 59 89 ~ Heavy Vehl2 6 2 12 6 2 12 2 2 12 2 2 PHF 10.96 0.96 0.96.10.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 PK 15 Vol 138 954 8 112 482 121 115 22 11 159 15 23 Hi Ln Vol I I I $ Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 ParkExist I I NumPark I I No. Lanes I 1 3 1 I 1 3 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L TR I L TR I L TR Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 0 Adj Flow 1150 1817 32 147 2913 161 135 1238 154 $InSharedLn I ~ I Prop LTS 11.000 0.000 11.000 0.000 11.000 0.000 11.000 0.000 Prop RTs I 0.000 1.000 I 0.201 I 0.391 I 0.604 Peds Bikesl 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 Buses 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 `kInProtPhase 0.0 10.0 I 10.0 0.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T A L T R L T R I I I I --------------- -------------- ------------ ----------- Snit Unmet 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 3 13 3 3 3 13 3 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I Factor I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ped Min g l 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 __PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds X Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A ~ I Thru A A Right A I Right A A Peds X Peds X NB Right I EB Right I SB Right I WB Right I I Green 8.0 59.0 8.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~mn~. ~o, zooa Pag2 6 Of 23 • • All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment I Eas tbound I Westbound I Northbound I Sou thbound I I L T R I L ' T R I L T R I L T R I I ----- Volume, V 1149 I -------- - 1749 31 145 ----------- 1851 466 I - --- 159 ------- 85 99 I -- ----- 1228 I --------- 59 89 PHF 10.96 0.96 0.96 10. 96 0.96 0.9 6 10.9 6 0.96 0. 96 10.96 0.96 0.96 Adj flow 1150 1817 32 147 1928 485 161 89 96 1238 61 93 I No. Lanes I 1 3 1 I 1 3 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I Lane group I L T R I L TR L TR I L TR Adj flow 1150 1817 32 147 2413 161 135 1238 159 I Prop LTS 11.000 0.000 11. 000 0.000 11.000 0.000 11.000 0.000 I Prop RTs I 0. 000 1.000 I 0.201 I 0.341 i 0. 609 I Saturation Flow R ate (see Exhi bit 16-7 to determine the adjustmen t factors) Eastboun d Wes tbound Nor thbound Sou thbound LG L T R L TR L TR L TR So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.993 0.980 0.960 0.951 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 0.908 1.000 1.000 0.908 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRT 1.000 0.850 0.970 0.949 0.909 fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.659 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. 0.063 0.063 0.498 fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 S 1770 9883 1583 1770 9772 1228 1768 1770 1699 Sec. 116 116 929 ---- __CAPAC ITY AND LOS WORKSHEET ---- -------- ----------- Capacity Analysis and Lane Gro up Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane G roup-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio ----------- Eastbound ---------- ---------- ----- ------- -------- ------------ Prot 118 1770 # 0.07 0.067 118 1.00 Perm 32 116 0.28 0.533 62 0.52 Left L 150 0.60 180 0.83 Prot Perm Thru T 1817 9883 0.37 0.49 2401 0.76 Right R 32 1583 0.02 0.49 778 0.04 Westbound Prot 97 1770 0.03 0.067 118 0.90 Perm 0 116 0..00 0.533 62 0.00 Left L 97 0.60 180 0.26 Prot Perm Thru TR 2413 9772 # 0.51 0.49 2396 1.03 Right Northbound Prot Perm Left L 61 1228 0.05 0.21 256 0.29 Prot Perm Thru TR 135 1768 0.08 0.21 368 0.37 Right Southbound Prot 118 1770 # 0.07 0.067 118 1.00 Perm 120 929 # 0.13 0.250 232 0.52 Left L 238 0.32 350 0.68 Prot Perm Thru TR 154 1699 0.09 0.32 536 0.29 Right C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project 13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~roa~. ~o, zoo6 P1g0 7 Of 23 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.77 Total lost time per cycle, L = 15.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.88 Control Delay and LOS Determination______________________________________ Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane ________ Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eastbound L 0.83 0.60 33.0 1.000 180 0.37 27.2 0.0 60.1 E T 0.76 0.49 24.7 1.000 2901 0.31 1.4 0.0 26.1 C 28.5 C R 0.09 0.49 15.8 1.000 778 0.11 0.0 0.0 15.8 B Westbound L 0.26 0.60 16.9 1.000 180 0.11 0.8 0.0 17.2 B TR 1.03 0.99 30.5 1.000 2346 0.50 26.3 0.0 56.8 E 56.1 E Northbound L 0.24 0.21 39.6 1.000 256 0.11 0.5 0.0 90.1 D TR 0.37 0.21 90.7 1.000 368 0.11 0.6 0.0 91.3 D 90.9 D Southbound L 0.68 0.32 37.6 1.000 350 0.25 5.3 0.0 42.9 D TR 0.29 0.32 30.8 1.000 536 0.11 0.3 0.0 31.1 C 38.2 D Intersection delay = 43.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts Input EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach M M M M Cycle length, C 120.0 se c Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) 72.0 72.0 25.0 38.0 Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g( s) 69.0 69.0 25.0 30.0 Opposing effective gzeen time, go (s) 59.0 59.0 38.0 25.0 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N 1 1 1 1 Number of lanes in opposing approach, No 3 3 1 1 Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) 150 47 61 238 Proportion o£ LT in LT lane group, PLT 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) 2413 1817 159 135 Lost time for LT lane group, tL 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 5.00 1.57 2.03 7.93 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 0.908 0.908 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) 29.53 22.23 5.13 9.50 gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] 0.51 0.51 0.68 0.79 gq, (see Exhibit C16-9,5,6,7,8) 59.11 35.91 0.00 7.70 gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf 9.89 28.09 25.00 22.30 n=Max(gq-gf)/2, 0) 29.55 17.96 0.00 3.85 PTHO=1-PLTO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PL*=PLT[1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) 16.66 8.70 1.52 1.99 EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.13 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g]/[1+PL(EL1-1)], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.06 0.06 0.66 0.50 flt=fm=[gf/g]+[qu/g]/[1+pL(EL1-1)]+[gdiff/g]/[1+pL(E L2-1)],( fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT 0.063 0.063 0.659 0.998 For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-tur n lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by si ngle-lan e approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET C:ILTEC106LTECProject13201 Bank AtlanticAdditional.wpd o~mner;o,zoo6 Page g Of 23 • Input for shared lefts EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach Cycle length, C 120.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 0.908 0.908 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VOC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),Oj gq, (see Exhibit C16-9,5,6,7,8) 4u=g-99 if 99>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf n=Max(gq-gf)/2, 0) PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT[1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+9.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g]/[1+PL(EL1-1)], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g]/[1+PL(EL1-1)]+[gdiff/g]/[1+PL(EL2-1)],(fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91 (N-1)]/N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by si ngle-lan e approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFEC TS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) 59.0 59.0 25.0 Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) 0 0 0 Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) 0 0 0 OCCpedg 0.000 0.000 0.000 Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) 59.11 35.91 0.00 Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp 1.002 0.609 0.000 OCCpedu 0.000 0.000 0.000 Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) 2413 1817 159 OCCr 0.000 0.000 0.000 Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec 1 1 3 Number of turning lanes, Nturn 1 1 1 ApbT 1.000 1.000 1.000 Proportion of left turns, PLT 1'.000 1.000 1.000 Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA 0.000 0.000 0.000 Left-turn adjustment, fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) 59.0 59.0 25.0 Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) 0 0 0 Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) 0 0 0 Vpedg 0 0 0 OCCpedg 0.000 0.000 0.000 Effective green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 30.0 Vbicg 0 0 0 OCCbicg 0.020 0.020 0.020 OCCr 0.000 0.000 0.000 Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec 1 1 3 Number of turning lanes, Nturn 1 1 1 ApbT 1.000 1.000 1.000 Proportion right-turns, PRT 1.000 0.201 0.609 C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd oceo6e, io, zoos P3g0 9 Of 23 • Proportion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA 0.000 0.000 0.000 Right turn adjustment, fRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 120.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 150 97 238 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 0.83 0.26 0.68 Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 Opposing queue effective green interval, gq 59.11 35.91 7.70 Unopposed green interval, gu 9.89 28.09 22.30 Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) 98.0 48.0 82.0 Arrival rate, qa=v/(3600(max(X,1.0])) 0.09 0.01 0.07 Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 0.492 0.992 0.492 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) 0.42 0.07 0.35 XPerm 1.29 0.91 0.26 XProt 0.59 0.19 1.51 Case 3 1 2 Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa 2.60 0.63 5.92 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu 2.96 0.97 3.68 Residual queue, Qr 0.60 0.00 2.02 Uniform Delay, dl 33.0 16.9 37.6 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE___ ____ Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec ---------------------------------------------- -------------- Eastbound L 0.0 0.00 33.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 60.1 T 0.0 0.00 30.5 24.7 0.00 0.0 0.0 26.1 R 0.0 0.00 30.5 15.8 0.00 0.0 0.0 15.8 Westbound L 0.0 0.00 16.4 0.00 0.0 0.0 17.2 TR 0.0 0.00 30.5 30.5 0.00 16.7 0.0 56.8 0.0 0.0 Northbound L 0.0 0.00 47.5 39.6 0.00 0.0 0.0 40.1 TR 0.0 0.00 47.5 90.7 0.00 0.0 0.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 Southbound L 0.0 0.00 37.6 0.00 0.0 0.0 42.9 TR 0.0 0.00 41.0 30.8 0.00 0.0 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Delay 43 2 sec/veh Intersection LOS D BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LaneGroup IL T R IL TR L TR L TR Init Queue 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 I Flow Rate 1150 667 32 147 865 161 135 1238 154 I So 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1 No.Lanes 1 3 1 I1 3 0 1 1 0 I1 1 0 SL 1300 1792 1583 1300 1751 11228 1768 11106 1699 1 LnCapacity 1180 881 778 1180 661 1256 368 1350 536 I Flow Ratio 10.5 0.9 0.0 10.2 0.5 10.0 0.1 10.2 0.1 I v/c Ratio 10.83 0.76 0.09 10.26 1.03 10.29 0.37 10.68 0.29 I Grn Ratio 10.60 0.99 0.99 10.60 0.49 10.21 0.21 10.32 0.32 I I Factor I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 I AT or PVG 13 3 3 13 3 13 3 13 3 1 Pltn Ratio 11.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1 PF2 11.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 I Q1 12.1 18.0 0.6 10.6 29.5 11.7 3.9 15.7 3.9 I kB 10.3 0.8 0.7 10.3 0.7 10.4 0.5 10.4 0.6 I Q2 11.1 2.2 0.0 10.1 10.7 10.1 0.3 10.9 0.2 I Q Average 13.2 20.2 0.6 10.7 40.2 11.8 9.1 16.6 4.1 1 Q Spacing 125.0 25.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 I Q Storage 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 I C: ILTEC106 LTEC Projec113201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd ocro6er ~o, zoos PdgO 1 ~ Of 23 Q S Ratio I I I I I 70th Percentile Output: fB$ 11.2 1.2 1.2 11.2 1.1 11.2 1.2 11.2 1.2 I BOQ ~ 13.9 23.9 0.7 10.9 45.7 12.2 9.9 17.8 9.9 I Q$Rat10 85th Percentile Output: fB$ 11.6 1.5 1.6 11.6 1.9 11.6 1.6 I1.5 1.6 I BOQ 5.1 29.3 0.9 11.2 55.5 12.9 6.9 110.1 6.4 Q$Rat10 90th Percentile Output: fB$ 11.7 1.5 1.8 11.8 1.5 11.8 1.7 11.7 1.7 I BOQ 15.6 31.2 1.0 11.3 58.5 13.2 7.1 111.1 7.1 I QSRatlO I 95th Percentile Output: fB$ 12.0 1.7 2.1 12.1 1.6 12.0 2.0 11.9 2.0 I BOQ 16.5 39.2 1.2 1.5 62.9 13.7 8.1 112.6 8.1 QSRatlO I 98th Percentile Output: fB$ 12.5 1.9 2.7 12.6 1.7 12.6 2.4 12.3 2.9 I BOQ 18.0 38.6 1.6 12.0 70.2 14.6 10.0 115.1 9.9 I Q$RdtlO I I ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~~oa~~ to, zoos Page 11 of 23 • . HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: JTR Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 10/10/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: OCr & Ent A Jurisdiction: Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips (Revised) East/West Street: Project Entrance A North/South Street: Old Coachman Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs ): 0.25 __ _______________Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments____ ___ ________ Major Street: Approach Northbound Sout hbou nd Movement 1 2 3 19 5 6 L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------- Volume 71 629 ---- 328 -------- 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 79 656 345 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR Upstream Signal? Yes No ---------------------------------------------------- Minor Street: Approach Westbound East -- boun -------- d Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R -- --------------- Volume 14 ---- --------- 98 Peak HOUr Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Servic e_ Approach NB SB Westbound Eas tbound Movement 1 9 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR --------------------------------------------------------- v (vph) 79 ---- ---------- 69 C(m) (vph) 1196 980 v/c 0.06 0.13 95$ queue length 0.20 0.96 Control Delay 8.2 13.7 LOS A B Approach Delay 13.7 Approach LOS B C: ILTEC1O6 LTEC Project132O1 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~~ober io, zooc Page 12 of 23 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JTR Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 10/10/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: OCr & Ent A Jurisdiction: Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips (Revised) East/West Street: Project Entrance A North/South Street: Old Coachman Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ------ ---------------- Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R --------------------------------- Volume 71 629 328 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak-15 Minute Volume 19 169 86 9 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 79 656 345 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 2 0 Configuration LT T TR Upstream Signal? Yes No ----------------------------------------------------- ---- Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ------------ --------------------------- Volume 14 98 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak-15 Minute Volume 9 ~ 13 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (s) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR ____________________Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments___________ Movements 13 14 15 16 ------------- ---------------------------- Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 walking Speed (ft/sec) 9.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 ________Upstream Signal Data ------------------- ------------------------ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 52 Left-Turn 199 1700 3 8 120 35 120 Through 85 1700 3 25 120 35 120 SS Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ------- ----- Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 656 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd ocroner ro, zoo6 P2g0 13 Of 23 • Worksheet 9-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R -------------------------------------------------------------------------- t(c,base) 4.1 7.5 6.9 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 2 2 2 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c, T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.8 6.9 2-stage - --------------- ----------------- ---- Follow-up Time Calculations Movement 1 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------------------------- t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t (f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 2 2 2 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ----------- ----- V grog ----- 85 ----------------------------- 194 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1700 1700 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 25 8 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.208 0.067 4(411 9.8 9.5 4(42) 0.3 0.9 g(q) 5.0 10.4 -------------------------------- Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection ---------------------------- Time blocked Mo vement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) --- -------------------- alpha -------- ------------------------------ 0.550 beta 0.695 Travel time, t(a) (sec) 2.332 Smoothing Factor, F 0.597 Proportion of conflicting flow, f 1.000 1.000 Max platooned flow, V(c,ma x) 1668 1700 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 1000 1000 Duration of blocked period, t(p) 4.6 6.9 Proportion time blocked, p 0.095 0.000 ------------------------------------- Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods ------- Result -------------------------------- ------------------------------------- p(2) ----- 0.095 ------------------------ p(5) 0.000 p(dom) 0.095 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? U ------------------------------- Proportion -------- ---------- ------------------- unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage - Tw o-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II -------------------------------- p(1) 1.000 -------- -------- -------------------- P(91 P(7) P(8) C: ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~mner io, zoos pag0 14 Of 23 • ~ • P(9) p(10) 0.905 p(11) p(12) 1.000 ------------------------------------- Computation 9 and 5 ----- ---- ------- Single-Stage Process Movement 1 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 359 1156 180 s 3000 2250 3000 Px 1.000 0.905 1.000 V c,u,x 359 1091 180 ----------------------------------------- C r,x 1196 -------- --------- 226 ----- - 832 C plat,x 1196 209 832 ---------------------------- Two-Stage Process --------- ---------- ----- ------- 7 6 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Sta gel Stage2 -------------------------- V(c,x) --------- ---------- ----- ------ s 2250 1500 P (x) V (c, u, x) C(r, x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor St. --------- 9 --------- ----- 12 ------- -------------------------- Conflicting Flows -------- --------- 180 Potential Capacity 832 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 832 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 ----------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. ------- 4 -------- ---- 1 ------- ------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows --------- ---------- 359 Potential Capacity 1196 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1196 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.94 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.90 ----------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. --------- 8 ---------- - 11 - ------------------------ Conflicting Flows -------- --- Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 -------- -- Step 4: LT from Minor St. ------- 7 --- - 10 Conflicting Flows ' 1156 Potential Capacity 209 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.90 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.92 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.99 Movement Capacity 191 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance --------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. ------ 8 -- ----- 11 ------- -------------------------------------------- Part 1 - First Stage --------- --------- ----- ------- Conflicting Flows C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~roner io, zao6 P1g0 1$ Of 23 5~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ------------------------------ Part 3 - Single Stage --------- -------------- -------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity ---- Result for 2 stage process: a --------- Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1156 Potential Capacity 209 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.90 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.92 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.99 Movement Capacity 191 Results for Two-stage process: a -------- Y C t 191 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations i Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) ---- ------ ----- ------------- 19 ---- 50 Movement Capacity (vph) 191 832 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 480 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep ------ ------ ------ -------------- 191 ----- 832 Volume 19 50 Delay Q sep C.•ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~mner io, zoo6 Pag0 16 Of 23 Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) -------------- n max C sh SOM C sep n C act worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 9 7 8- 9 10 Lane Config LT ----------------------------------------------------- v (vph) 79 C(m) (vph) 1196 v/c 0.06 95~ queue length 0.20 Control Delay 8.2 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 p(oj) 0.99 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 656 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P*(oj) 0.90 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 9 8.2 N, Number of major street t hrough lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay fo r stream 2 or 5 0.8 480 11 LR 64 980 0.13 0.96 13.7 B 13.7 B Movement 5 1.00 C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Addttional.wpd o~robe, to, zoos Page 17 Of 23 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: JTR . Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 10/10/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: GtB & Ent B Jurisdiction: Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips (Revised) East/West Street: Gulf to Bay Boulevard North/South Street: Project Entrance B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments - ------- ----- ---- Major Street: Approach Eastbound West bound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R ---- -- -------- Volume 1918 ----- 1990 ----- 9 ---- Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2018 2094 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Sout hbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R ------------------------------------------- Volume 32 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 Configuration R _______________-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Servic e__ _ _ Approach EB WB Northbound _ Southbound __ Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R --- ------------------------------ v ( vp h ) ------- ---- --- 3 3 C(m) (vph) 553 v/c 0.06 95~ queue length 0.19 Control Delay 11.9 LOS B Approach Delay 11 .9 Approach LOS B C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Addttional.wpd o~mbe. io, zoos PSgO 1 g Of 23 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ---------------------- --------------------- Analyst: JTR Agency/Co.: LTEC Date Performed: 10/10/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: GtB & Ent B Jurisdiction: Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Projected with Total Trips (Revised) East/West Street: Gulf to Bay Boulevard North/South Street: Project Entrance B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 9 5 6 L T R L T R ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 1918 1990 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak-15 Minute Volume 505 529 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2018 2099 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal? No Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------- Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ---------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 32 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Peak-15 Minute Volume 8 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R _ _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 19 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data --- ------- Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet --------------- ---------------------- S2 Left-Turn Through SS Left-Turn 59 1700 3 25 120 90 160 Through 1895 1700 3 59 120 90 160 Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles - ----------------------------------- Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: C.•ILTEC1O6LTECProject132O1 Bank AtlanticAdditional.wpd o~rone.io.zooe Page 19 of 23 Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation ----------------------------------------------------------------- Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R -- ----------------------------------------------- t(c,base) 6.9 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 2 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 t (c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 6.9 2-stage 6.9 -- ------------------------------------------- Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R - ------------------------------------------ t(f,base) '3.30 t(f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 2 t(f) 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ----------------------------- V prog ------------------ ---- 1895 ---------- 59 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 3400 3900 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 59 25 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.992 0.208 g(ql) 33.1 1.6 g(q2) 39.3 0.0 9(q) 72.4 1.7 -------------------------------------------------------- Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocke ------ d ---------- Movement 2 Mo vement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) -------- alpha ------------------ ------ ----------- 0.400 beta 0.714 Travel time, t(a) (sec) 2.721 Smoothing Factor, F 0.563 Proportion of conflicting flow, f 1.000 1.000 Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 3900 2551 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 2000 2000 Duration of blocked period, t(p) 57.9 0.9 Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.990 ---------------------------------- Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods ------------------ Result ---- -------- -------------------------------------- p(2) -------- ---------- 0.000 ----- ---------- p(5) 0.990 p(dom) 0.990 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? U -------------------------------------- Proportion ----------- ------ ----- ---------- unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Proc ess movements, p(x) Process Stage I St age II ----------------------------------- P (1 ) ---------------- -- ----- -------- p(4) P(7) P(8) C: ILTECI06 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd o~roner io, zooc Page 2~ Of 23 ~ ~ p(9) p(10) p(11) p(12) 0.510 Computation 9 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ---------- ------------------------------------------- V c,x 1052 s 3000 Px 0.510 V c,u,x 0 C r,x 1084 C plat,x 553 Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 -------------------------------------------- V(c,x) s -------- ---------------------- P(x) V (c, u, x) --------------------------------- ---------- C(r,x) -------- -------------------- C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ----------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor St. -------- 9 ---------------------- 12 ---- Conflicting Flows --- 1052 Potential Capacity 553 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 553 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major St. 9 1 ----------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows ---- ---- --------------------- Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ----------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. ------- 8 ------------------ 11 ----------------------- Conflicting Flows -------- -------------- Potential Capacity - Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 -------------- Conflicting Flows ------- ----------------- Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 1.00 Movement Capacity Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two- stage Gap Acceptance ------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. -------- 8 --------------------- 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows C.•ILTEC106LTECProject13201 Bank AtlanticAdditional.wpd o~ronerio,zooe PagE 21 Of 23 ~ _ ~ Potential Capacity 103 128 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 103 128 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 --------------------- Part 2 - Second Stage ---------- --------- ------- -- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 127 103 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 127 103 -------------------- Part 3 - Single Stage ------------ ---------- ------------ -- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity ----- ------- Result for 2 stage pr ----------- ocess: ---------- ------------ ----- a 1.00 1.00 Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 - ----- Step 4: LT from Minor -------- St. ---------- -------------- 7 -------- 10 Part 1 - First Stage ---------- ---------- ------ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 91 124 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 91 124 Part 2 - Second Stage -------- --------- -------------- --------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 525 318 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 1.00 Movement Capacity 999 318 ------------------ Part 3 - Single Stage ------------ ---------- -------------- ---------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedan ce factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Im p Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 1.00 Movement Capacity --------------------- Results for Two-stage ------------ process: ---------- --------- ------- a 1.00 1.00 Y C t Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R --------------------------- Volume (vph) ---------------- ----- ------ -------------- ----- 33 Movement Capacity (vph) 553 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) -------------------------- ---------------- ----- ------ -------------- ----- Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement ------- --------~---- --8-- ---9-- --10-----11-- --1Z- L T R L T R -------------- C sep ---------------- ----- ------ -------------- ----- 553 Volume 33 Delay 4 sep C: ILTEC106 LTEC Project13201 Bank Atlantic Addttional.wpd o~mbe. ~o, zoo6 PagB 22 Of 23 • • Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ------------------------------------------------- Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config R v ( vph ) --------------------------------3 3----- C(m) (vph) 553 v/c 0.06 95o queue length 0.19 Control Delay 11.9 LOS B Approach Delay 11.9 Approach LOS B Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay -------------------------------------------- ----------- Movement 2 Movement 5 .p(oj) 1.00 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P' (oj ) d (M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes drank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 C.•ILTEC1O6 LTEC Project132O1 Bank Atlantic Additional.wpd ocrober ro, zoos Page 23 of 23 ~ K.C. BOUCHILLON I I Attorney at Law i ~ LILLY, O~TOOLE & BROWN, LLP 310 EAST MAW STREET ~ PO BOX 50 ~ BARTOW, FLORIDA 33831 Pn°"` 863-533-5525 ~ I; 863-533-0505 `"'°`~ KC@LOBLAWYERS.COM Sandra Owens MM~CI~L President OPM$NT OLU110NS, IAC Site Investigation /Due Diligence • Rezoning • Platting Engineering • Permitting x Conswcbion Management Services 1118 South Florida Ave., Lakeland, FL 33803-1379 Phone: 863-802-1500 • Fax: 863-802-1505 • Cell: 863-559-3800 Email: sandra.owens@cdsincmail.com // fi •9 TTY O~ CLEAR~ATEIZ PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CI,F.AFtWA'I'ER, FLOaIDn 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOU('H MYRTLE AVENUE, CI,EARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 29, 2007 Sandra Owens Commercial Development Solutions, Inc. 1118 South Florida Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-07043 at 2498 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Ms. Owens: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E. of the Community Development Code. On August 31, 2006, Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to permit a Financial Institution (Bank) in the Commercial (C) Zoning District with an increase to building height (for an architectural embellishment -tower) from 25 feet to 35 feet; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.I. The DRC recommended approval of the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Offices criteria under provisions of Section 2-703.I.; 2. The plan complies with the General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Engineering conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That all Environmental conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That all Fire conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That all Land Resource conditions are met prior to the issuance of a building permit; 5. That all Stormwater conditions are met prior to the. issuance of a building permit; 6. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)\InactivRe or Finished Cases\Gulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) -Approved\Gulf to Bay 249'] ~i; ~ehv~~Q~~~~t, Q{~g(t~oc Jc~cc;~ I)ca;,~~, Cui:nc:n_>ir:~nsra; f fc~i~r l l:~~u~:rc,~. Cuc ~cai~cc:~iisiac 13u.i. !c,~.tic~~, Cc,rra:u.>u:~iisi:i; Cni;i.e~ A. Prn:rsr::~;, Cui ncac.~ni>u+ra; "l~:c,>I~A~. li,tu~l.<>v:~Ir:~~rANI> nFnRatn„vl~: nl-~1o:~ !i;\u~l.c>vitit~~ January 29, 2007 Owens -Page 2 7. That all signage be compliant with current Code; 8. That the dumpster enclosure be constructed and painted of the same materials as the building; and 9. That a Unity of Title be recorded with the Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court and a copy submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan date received December 26, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 28, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions; please do not hesitate to call Steven Everitt, Planner II, at 727-562- 4567. You can access zoning ~ for parcels within the City through our website: www. myc 1 eanv ater. co m . Sincerely, ~~~' ~~ .//f" ~~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning Department) C D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslGulf to Bay 2498 -Bank Atlantic (C) - ApprovedlGulf to Bay 2498 -Development Order.doc i-. r 7