The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-11062- ' , ~~ . ^?T,nn@ng Qepartc:~et~f CASE NUMBER: '1?,7~7 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY Staff Initials ? ~ ~[eanarater, Florida 33756 ( } F` - -°+.,~,,,,2"kw.~`~~,.•~ '(Olephone:727-552567 DATERECEIVED: OR~GINA/ "~ ~ °~r~~~°- .:~ "..~""~~~t'-~::- Fax: 727-55265 ~~`~~li~-~- t _, ^ SUBMITORIGINALSIGNEDANDNOTARIZEDAPPLICATION ~"Pr s~ t~ - P~A~u ~~~I d ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and C~~~j~~~ ~~~ appli~tion~ are requiredto be collated, ~ apledand folded i nto set; © +~ i ~~~ ~/ey~lQQl}~ I ~ NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THlS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBf~IITTED IN '-'" CONJUNCTION W ITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ON E OR LEVEL TW O APPLIC ATION. r (Revised 03/29/2006) ~e.r`~`F~L-ieEr$N~, `~°'RO[~C~ iii O~~/a~~~i=.~. ~Li`~i€~~i~~~i/~V~~~u~i~il~'~€~~Lie~`-ciic~. ~4: EvCFf•~sc ~cJ^.u.~sic~F-~v~.~?~ APPL ICANT N AIL<i E: _~ ~/ ~&a ~/F~-1E:/~! ~/ i~~ t~~ ,~~"(r/'. ~ ~~~~ hhAILIR~GADDRESS: ~ ~C,,ii~ ~ ,t `°~i`~[~`lj~"`~- Ir°[~~__p6:.5~~" ~ PHONE NUMBER: ~~~+~_~ Z}~^_! GELLNUMBER: __._~ i~~ T__ V~ PROPERTY OWNERS}: ~~~t~~ ~~ ~( ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~. 1 ,/u ~-V4~y m~~ List ALL owners on the deed `~` ~j{~ / f AGENT NArJIE: 4 MAILING ADDRESS: tca~C~ f.,~°~~-. ~ ~ ~~~~ PHONE NUMBER: ,~% ~,~ ~~~~G-~ FAX NUMBER: ~~ ~ ~ _ ~~_ CELL NUMBER: l.r/~"t.~ ~~['~~ E-MAILADDRESS: 'f~' /~~\~~'~ C.~C.fl~`\ 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Corr~rehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed onthe parcel proposedforthedevaloprrent. s S OR b_ The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping othervise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the rr>inimum landscape standards. , „ ,~ _ ~ A R C:1Do^ menu a SeftingslderekfergusonlDeskfoplnewplanningfilestG~ nsive L.andscape~rocyam2W6.doc ~R~GI RFCE~~ a 2. LIGHTING: ~ ZOO, ~N~NG p ' Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscap° grogram is automatically controlled so Ca~h~"g~tiy~~~9~tf~1~,o when the business is closed. , ~ ~ _ _ I _ C gQIA.. _ c~r n 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment ~ oposed i n the Co mprehensive Landscape Program vdll enhance the comrrcanitycharacter of the Ciiyof Clearv~et 5. SP'cCIAL AP,EA OR SCENIC COP.RIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatrrf~nt proposed in the Corr~rehensive Landscape Program is consistenYvnah anyspacial area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adoptedforthe area in u<k~ic the parcel proposed for devnl~rrentisloca~Gd. _ _ --- .. _. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TVVJ APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, ,RENDERINGSAND PERSPECTIVESMAYBE NECESSARYTO SUPPLEMENTTHE INFORMATION PP.OVIDED ON THIS WJRKSHEET. y SIGNf~~URE: I, the undersigr~d, acknov~ledge that all representations rtede in this application are true and accurate to the best .of my ImovAedge and authorize City representatives to visit and ptrotog.raph the pr operty described in this applicatio n. ~.~ _ . Signature of propertyow er or r resentative ... STATE OF FLORIDA,000NTY OF PINEL AS Sworn to a nd s ubscribed before me this ~ day of Cl,~n_r._~=_ix ~--' A.D. 20 ~"~_to me and/or by ~ c=~~~[`~~~n _, wfio is personally !mown has produced _~ as identification. ~ ~~~ Q~~~ N o'6ry pu~c,• ~~~ Mycomrrission e~ires: , ~,;P~, :;;a?... e4 : ~,ynn A. IVlatthev -4• *_~vrwcnsston3F11ll246828 ==,"9~ ~~Q;o`c Expires: Oct 13, 2007 °F ~°~` Bonded Thnt l~tlantic Bonding Co., Inc. C:1Documenfs and Seffin~lderekfergusonlDesktoplne,vplannin~ileslComprehensive Landscape Pro~am 2006.doc Page 2 of 2 The landscape treatment {5oposed in fhe Comprehensive Landscape Program vall have a beneficial impact on the value of the property i n the ~ ~ ~ ~ November 29, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 . Re: Flexible Standard Development Application 2340 drew Street Bear Wayne Wells, The following letter is a request for approval of the attached application for the project at the above referenced address. This project was originally the Phase 2 of the Drew Street Office Park which was approved and Phase 1 completed. The zoning of the whole property is ®ffice {O). The balance of the .property was sold to my client and we are moving forward to provide office space to the Social Security Administration and other pending tenants. This application is made as a joint request with the Phase 1 development known now as Drew Professional Park Condominium Association, Inc. and 2340 Drew Street, LLC... This application is intended to allow the property to be separated under two ownerships with each property to be in compliance with the City's requirements. On behalf of the Condo Association we are asking for a zero (0) setback to paving occurring ~t the proposed property side lot line between the two. This parcel as submitted for development would require a reduction in the setbacks to paving on the West side (Anna Street) and the South side (Drew Street) from 25' to 15', and on the North side (rear adjacent property) and the East side (Phase 1) from 20' to 10'. We are also requesting an increase in the maximum. height from 30' to 45', as indicated on our proposed elevations. The parking as proposed averages out to 3.73/1000 sq.ft... We are also requesting the ability to rent to government agencies with out a spot zoning change. As part of the original development as approved this parcel designated Phase 2 was designed for offices and the supporting parking. In conjunction with that the storm retention pond was designed for the whole development Phase 1 and Phase 2. The calculations as attached verify that the pond has the capacity to handle the differences in lot coverage from the originally approved and built design and the redesigned portion. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~ ~~~ 630 Chestnut Street Clear~vnter, Florida 33756 727.796.8774 DEC 0 ~ 2L~06 P C r(O GCLEp,RWA ERT ~i~Q ~ 0 f~ 727.791.6942 fnx 2340 Drew Street Flex Standard Application 11-29-06 pg 2 If you have any other questions or concerns please don't hesitate to contact me. We look forward to your prompt review and anticipate your positive response. Allowing us to move forward to complete development along Drew Street for the Social Security Administration Sincerely, ~~/ 1 I ~ % ~~ Hobert E.~~--!'~ ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 0 0 2QQ6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1L/05/2006 10:56 7273645979 It~ Fd:~20052a2BB? 8K: 146bb P0: 6 ~ T/le/2005 &t 08:14 PBS, R3CORDING i3 F '' 311:,.00 ti~N HUR!¢, Cf.~rU: OE C,,, ~ ~INLI.L,AS O~IlN'ly', FI. 8Y YSti"DY9'tY r_~t~; ~" ' Cl.EQZ022 FiET1lRN TO II~•UU 1 TITLE $~CU~ITY -~ 2552 First Aw~nue NoRh 81. PetersA05,•fnE ~ 33't~9 This t'~unent prs~e9 Dy; Wrv~A Ford Eee tORD A PORD, PA 2S6QFrelA~e Nd01 ~t ~erebup,T5an6s a77t3 ©~' OF tcA GONNtsCTiON tLitHT3 STATEOt' FLORIDA CDUNIY OF PINELL45 71ds Oronl of Eeeomonta (~ 'l~roortwnC) R mods Rted entan>Id fe+lo Iht~ ,~,_My of ~~ m05. by and DeMesa DRFtlV PARK, i1C, a Ronda IhNlad tlabllgy company. wPwea tees is 281 L~tdmartt D;tee, C~>awater, Flottd® 33781 (The 'G1an~t}, artd OIUg Ht~`!, il.C, e fide limited 5aality o~llpany, address is 367Q T83ttpa Road. Sulre D, Qtdidltar, Flortla 34677 (d1o 'cranteo'). A. CiranODt ~ 619 a++t9r 8119@ etmpk of pvep9rtp lo:a~vt In t~unry, F'loride, ntiore Pe.N;wlarly dseuiDed' In Fah7bk °a' attarlled hereto and +ncorporatad hereon by refererroa, eomn+any hrlnlrrn ~ OREW PilOFE6SiONAL PAR!(, which b arrDJ9et to tltA Dotieletlat of Caldorrenltrm for Dra1v Prolessianel Path, a comm9lci~ condornlnham, socotoleda+ tJti 6aok 43t6t, paa9 9718 at g19 WI9l~ R4mntde of P&sehes f)wrnry, t1d74d2, a4 artlanded N fAZ Beolc T347d, papa 13~r O< 88td ICCLrdB (Gti7llat6ve(y, 61e "Gondutnlnlum De~lmaaon7. 6afd property arsd anylmprov0nlents tller9cvi she)i (1er9in~er 69 taktrred i0 69 tl~ Y3tentor's Properly'. ®. Granlea Is Cne owner In fee simple of proporty located in PIr19ea3 t ourliy, fhMda, rt~re partlwleriy descrit>ett In Ennibh "B' aNe~led h~BD~ and hoorprxalad ha{eln Gtr referer~e. Sid prnparly and any Improvements thereon shall hereLll~ter bere6erred to es 61e'Qrerllee'® Proper, C, Grantee desires to obtain from Granla the rlghl to ootln9d 6o aced easements for Cte use or senltary sewer tdaiiities 6o0aled On and aoas(reg Granlots Property, 99sernentt+ for storm v~ate- areinape and relsntix on era! ~~osa Granbr's Pn>p~; and tlsa righ9 ~ mnnect to me rtturd~pal water llna blares on ~d >~oss (taentofe Platralty, end the paAfae desNa >D provido for tedproaei tress end egress tights over end traaasportlone o9 QrarNOfB Property and t3r~e's Property. Q. Grenror m1d Oranme have agreed, fn oonaldeta6o++ of Ten OoRas (i1t7.00), ro prenl Ere r~hte of connec6orl and easemenle (or eenaary sewer, munkipel water, slam voter draln~e end ~c9se ere d(pr6gaid, EVbf eCt 10 ire (acme and cotditans treteinatmr e9i fords, Page 1099 r~~ PAVE 02/16 ORIGINgL RECENEp DEC 0 g 206 D®®Crtptioar Ptae22ea,FL Locam9nt-BCak.Pegw 14466.667 Pager 1 oP 19 0='d®r: OSE210d6 Comment: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Or31G~~N~1,,. ~2~fr•Q6. 12/65/2666 1F~:56 7273845979 • PAGE 63!16 Fid$LrJOS COUN'P1r FL OFF. REC. Sr( 6 ®C3 668 NOW, TNEREf4RE, for and in arns~erstfan tl>s sum o! Ten spans (810.0 alb other good and velua~e carelderation, the r~ipt of vA~h is hereby ac9utowtedged, the parties agreA as Blows' 1. s~~ Seaver. Gca!+tcar hec~y grsn~ k~ Gnudes 6±e right b ooc-~41e tlta underground senttery sewer rhea totaled under Grentora Property at d,e print o! oonnectlon ('3ewer POCJ shown on EMhlDtt "C" ettad,ed trereto and InoaparateQ bereh by refarettoe, togelhrl with a perpetual rton~exdusive easenrer,t ror access ta, use ar,d mektlenerrae sf the urdetgrovtto twtmary sewer tires runnh,g rrom Grantee's >~nY and boated under Ciraritors Propesiy lherckralret cebe0 the'Sa+dlaty Seurat Eeeertlent'-. Granter and Gcerrtte hereby agree an behalf of fherr,sehea and thekrespttcAlve auocesssrs and aea~ns Iha{ Grar>bre earl be sorely resoanable for the tvet of maiMenet~s Ot aro Sewer POG end erry sewer ladlldes irteteYed by Grantee. and for the purpo~ d maNMnance U,oraol, tltarttae s~+d1 Rave a nonestlu0tve essetrranf br Uro use o! a reasonable errrowit of Ore sutfttce of Gods Property for the sole purpose o1 p`ttomrirg such rnalMenelxa. Gctrntar shay m~nteln Ot t3ranco(e sole a~enaa rise asw~ hxtifaes IrteleYeB by Cdranlor a~ (imwPe Property. Grmtrx rte ftn right in ~ sole dieorsdbrc tD rtlo~ty arrd neloeate hle Banhery eEwer tetlRDse boated on t,;ranpar's Properly and the e9socielBd Sae-Bery Sewes tctssernertl, et Grantnra ar¢rens<e, h wnr+ection rhth Grantors orris rirra~ot'a vas or devebpmerd aS C~ret-mrs Properly, 80 tang Sa 5'1E trsulanq configurstlon svitti si; 4r~te Slid ~ gavs:rtmacttd ragUiretrt~S4 and dDe3 no! aPreot Gronroob t;cwva POC, ~d soar, work doer not cause ~+,~ dlrn,plhn d' 9eWBr service m Grent~'a Preperty. 2, Wat~Sarui~, C,~tt~ hE'~by nrertt~ Ro Qra~e fns rtnht b asnnecl !Q pre Cih of Clearwalec water m®n Incahed urrdaa Crsntoda 6'rapesW tp {t1tD point ar t~»eaifon (981atar PDL'sfroum on I~ea ~ a,~e rem eras iltoorpaated thin ey tara,ti~rroe, with a perpetual non~axdusfve aasaanent hx aooass 1a use ~trd m~rtarrarae o1 ttts -ri~sr mtdn kr„abd urrdsr ttarrto>'e Property (hecalneRat carped 6ts 'Weber r~esement°6. Grenbx acrd Grantee t,areby agree ~ (~ tl+sm4sMes and tlrtar reS~JG9rve eutxa~ors and ~~ ubr QreotroD eha4 ba sokly rrororta6pta br (ha east of mainbnvroa or WalorPOC acrd any wafer ~fle9 fnetaped by Granlse, and fOr the purpose otttialsban:ance Qtered, t3rarr~e ~ have a aon~otdua6va easement fa the use d a reasonable eanoimt o1 era audaaa of Grantors Property foc true sofa purpose of paforrMng such medntertenoe. Grsrttor yep rtiasttain et Gtsntat`e sore eta fhe water realties rnaf$ttes by r3rantor on crat,rxs rropany. or>:rrta roaarroas n,~ rlgtn h na ode ~fr~ ro modify and mate n,e water Ibre bcebed on t3tenlor's Property curd are e~odate4 water Eaxrrier,t, r» arantate escper+ee, in oxrnsstlon wlfi Granbra a ~ euce,eeaoa's tsa ~ devt~xneM of Grartlots Pmpany, so bng ag 8ie reaulUrrg oonflgura~rs conrpA¢s vrifh all t>l~s and local governmental regrrlreRron~ end does net att~l c~rce'e water POC, ens atcen vmrtc goes nd cause an unrsasoneme dfsreplfon o1 war ssrvroe ro (irantee'a Plo~erty, 3. )~qg. Gxenmr tvtreby grants b Grenlee a p~pelua4 tpr-~luslua easement for 0t4tm wafer draLusge and raEenUon seer, epees acrd under c3ranars t'ropeny as enotan on Eufrlbft 'C' entaared hatch end Incorporated harebr by reference (horebrefler Caged tiro °Drerrege lard F8alention te9setrrenls'). Grants and Grantee shat melntain tl,e seas coverer by the Drakittge sob tiatention F.ase+nents ('RomnUon Aree~ in good vvorking order end repelr h acmrdanea vAd, eppllceble permhe. The panes ttsre4a further agree drat tlta cast sf ma=r~r,,:n~ sf i!~ y2s~nt:trs Atss e,•,sn tzs F.ama by Grantor and 0-antea in Use same preportion met serh aurl-pany or Ure& euaoarmor i~as rite Ratemion Area, Page 2 of 9 ORIGINAL RECENEt~ DEC 0 6 2(~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARINATFR dl®®cription~ P1ne11ere,AL Document-Boak.aege 144BB.BS7 1'eg®l 2 oP IJ Order-; 0522026 Caa,w®nh: 12/05/2(706 10:56 x273845979 PAGE 6411E • • gaerer.sas cornett FL OFP', RLC. BN s P6 sss In that regard, un(N a defennirtaticvt as ~ actual use pe+rsntage b detBmdned to l~ordarme with this paragrapA, E-e Doer of n-alntensnce o4 the Ralertllon Area shell be home 5096 by GBrtlar and 6096 by Grantna, upon trtarrtmg Deere esaoctaaetl vaot such melnlenanw, Granter tthaB Invoice Gsaa1I98 tcx Grantees share Eroreot, end Grantee shell pay the same !a Grantor withfi 8tifry f301 dQya lhereaRer. Upon wAtl~ request by eAher Grantor a Grantee OD IAe other pally. fire partlea stta6 eng~ an engktser mutually eg~0 uDo^ by G~mor end Gaan-ae. 9ueh enpiner droll determine tlra aaL,re end extent of the eDorm water dretnege a the Retention Area raErtbutaltle 1o Grentots PopeAy and b t3rantee'e Property, end Ere r®sutCng atkeatbn shat) se uses as Ere parties' reepaetlve shares of engoktp mBintenmwe cosos. SttatQ Crankrr and 4rarttee DB unabb to sates upon an engineer b make arwi, a detomtinatbn, then eesR sAafl Bert a enolrtaer, artd the two ertp>naers end shoe ea~z a tltird enplneer m maze tt,a detarminelion. Tree casts of ti,a engineer a er,gt~ers shat ee ~ equs~0y between Grantor and . E~cwpt in 1t-a cffie a t3rantorr devetoprttent of oren[ork Propery, b ste extent that oartatruttlon beywrd namal mam~rtBrtoe of the Retentbn Arears neoesdteted by storm weir dradtage from tirantofs propesgr a Gran~e'a Pron2rtr oa Is rt~tulnsd by any Dovearatteniet rrputeaon. ~ cost o6 aueh oatsauetion shalt be home proporeovrabeiy by such parry or parEes. The defertrtYtatlon ea do the (aopottlonela respanBlblMy to eush oon8btrrtiwt Doers shall be made 4aaod upon a review a0 the ReOanlion Aral by an ettg>neer muntady agreed upon M C~ert~r and Grantee tt tttxx>adaneo altlt Era pra~rre eat tbrEs above fi the aut~agrspts ae m me~ee~o~oa aoerA. Greninr and Granle2, Bret ohc~r nt,p~va a~ersoss arai essdgn9, reserve iha right b r~Cate, ~fl~°, rt:dlkla (,r7, fitly X13 RBtenGOn AIB~ S6 aE; t0 OOiltDtj` Y~ 8N ate alld fOCEI ~OYt•PAF~i1taE tM_1E~g o»d roguta!'q+e ragerdMrB drainage anC re6>rtgen hposed M ~nnoaaran a9U+ enp devutapmsrst ar Gearto~'s ry or Grantee's PtoDestp, ~ sppi~ta, sa iorgT as the rasultlr~ ooroPpurstlat and shoe rxirtiJrwe to sooommade~ aretna8e ken both Grsntale Property ~d Grantee's property, titwutd alEosr par6y ~g(c to rnodlty ~ Re~ntion Area ~ pen ~ Ets deve/spntrert of such parf~® tartdB, os modlFkatbrt ~ E,e Retention arse ba requ~reC by ~vemresnte! e~maib ~+a~on of tl,e Oevebpmmt oisuc@r pertt/a tones, the parry's darrabp+ttetit retlnp ate rr~tAcstion adtBII irifrtr tl1B tests o(sadr moddi~n ~ eenstrudian as la ~E oast and eapenea, vilA melntenBnae Etereattu to be trorrro by Grmttar and Grantee fn aobordence ~'St tree p~artt~a agreed m or Qetennined In aoardBnee altlt the forego(rtg subpar~raph. a. Gn3rtbr and Grantee Hereby amt ~ eecA other a ptYpetuel +ecipnual roan. ar~usive ®~e+eent to Ingress and egress over snd across the paved oc ~ fla paved stuteoes for eektlcutar Nav9t (net pa~xhg eneaB) anoNri 84 oorntectlng GrBntofB PtOparty arM Qr~ltae'B Proptxty on Eahlb(t'C" ttBeln recd ttomporate6 nsrern oy rsrerena (tra -Ao~oas Eaaement7. Said Atxeee Easement eheA used sotey for vehkufer eases by Orentor and Grandee and lAetr respective sueossaors, asslpns, tenants, InaW®ea Bnd quests. To era eodent first any tlsunpe may scar re ihB Atl0."9a Easement area by reason of etCrer Grentors or Grantee's tree of try pureuam 9o this DmegrapA, Grantor a [;yentas, ~ tt+e rxBe may ~, ahe9 bB o>>ageted m restore ay replace any damaged roadrray, ahnrbtiery, or eAtet property ao darnagad, nr to firliy aomperesate 9+e o4Aer party ~r sucn dame®en, Page 3 018 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DES 0 6 2[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI1Y OF CLEARWATER meacrfpCioa: Piae22ee,PL Docum+rnt:-~ock.PaBe 2®966,667 J9ag~: 3 oP 23 OrAsr+ pSd?20P6 CoamraenC, 1~/05l2006 10:56 /273645979 PAGE 05/16 • • PINELLaB COtht27 FL OFt~. REC. ~K _ '6 PG 670 5. ~~p. to addltbn fi the eesemenl rigtats aM pr1v11agee herein twraveped, Grartlee ehal have the aipht to arcs so much of the surface of Gaanbfa Property es rosy ba te~natdp tttrrassery 10 tnnstruet and tneiMafi within tste eesenaont ertt~ ttte fecntttes wn~trtptated try this ~ upon the oompMlion rk twfi otkt8WL1i0n end Il~t~egon, Gta,tlee she@, et Ifs erDeme. reptaoe and tesexe eN IendecapNg sfifdt may have been aebcaled or tenrwed daring any tluch constrarcdan. Oran(ee sfieli pay Granby reesonabte camoerseattort fa writ any btu, vralls, ebaxiures, t>txUa laradecaping vhtictl may cast b>° repi~eble. 6. T~p~, Tlo9 easemeatt Aghta end prinlaQas granted tae+etmdtx shalt temakaete wd+en, a ~t curh thte u. such tfphbs are abaaa~rasd try Or~otee a Orartlo:, a taacome hnposaibls of perfottrtsrroe, to ttte event t3tart~e a GParotor 1e44s b partam any arveaent or undettat4ng a abtgPatiat erlefrg hereamder and tells to Cabe Ste 981113 vACatn ~ (~P) dey0 d reaelpt oP tadtlen no6oe hunt Ute otter Pub', ~ r~hts granted hereby shat ~ lertnlnated and tAN shell be of rto fuAher come of effect. 7. of Use. Grenbr end t~ertsee rmt~ro, reserve and eh~i Oontirxl8 to en)oy the use of the surtax of Cwtr tespsctiva leroda, lndueing Cae eastanent areas usceled Ulatein, boy atop eM ail purposes k4atCh do oat kltettsne xdtlo ms putp~ end ass of the aaaa~ttsn~ granted twrein, 'P~e tti Gre<ttot'e t~rarpr is reaeave9 h tfie Grsntcr, eubjod b crier aaeetrwnto wad aenbkYorta of nxwd, wed ri®dncumertt tr9ae8 only ba tx>llstrared to gtarn aesen~ttts for has purposes heove yef fo7tia. True ~, Grxttee's f'~ny is raservad N ~ Grantee, sutra to otter eeselaesnb and reaai~aas of r6oard, wtd Cara doastta+ot ~ts1P only be ootleEnasd to grat+t easerrtenN fat Cre put~ses hetetnebave sat ~. g. Ft Grantor rx Grantee tx the cespediue tiUCOCS9ots fall to eo.•npy tahh the nespOn9Li(iNas und6r this Agreetnsa6 then Qrantor or Grants a tlaek Rspet~ve suoo~ta, am dte cue maybe, shat have floe rigPat, 69 add-aon bD srtyother tights avdlsble tpr:Per Iflb Agrear~tlt et Isar of In aquRy, m proasca to en ~Uon In a wwa d uwey~lant juAedktlon for epaotttn pertormenoe, k txtr>g cBneed by the partles ta@t8t0 that era B~iion fOP den~as aa:kAd not be an equate ttaaraasly for a tft6i°?f 08 881$ l and that Ue pesval6ny party to any Amon wg be fiabta Oa the ncotvptriv~tg Daaty tar a! allotneps' tees and mote through et appeals. tf e19tzK pally felts C,n perform any ntahdeltaflx obfpetlrx~ of such petty ~ Gtr ,a9reertmttf, trod tPOe9 Oot f~1'I@IIy 9trd1 tallarB WICIBn QI9 Cute perloa Set forth In Paua~rtr@h 6 tabo-m, thaxt Pha odb- pub ehaq hav® dos ,glht, >>vt sat the oDiiQe@on, in ptaAorm the ntaoesamy mafntenenoa vA1ta, flt ttte deFdtalbng pattya cost and etapertce, end ttae dafeu0ing pally sRatl relmbartle Ste oRhet party tolAhtn titeen (t 5} days oP racelpt oP an fnvolm thatebr. Ea;ft party shsPl have tgNlvti oaeemettt rfghta o+~ Boa dafau5iflg petty® property ea may be r»9eonaDty necessary fi sensty any ntanotm-ance aDYgattwts rrevaesltated by Use defatrttng party's tsilure. 8. t~ernnatE~. to dae erent Boat all a any portion o4 dte ea9eraseM atea6 b taken try co~emnatfa+a h a govemmeMal tmdy a euthorny eo trial Ih use ar acmes a Pot any Dater purpose canlemP-ated by !hfi !r<greerttettt b no longer possible, hoen Cte tlten present owners of et m any aAected ptsrtlon of sacra ea®ement e~eas tBOal{ have Bee dgtd to ttaioeate, o>~e1ad ot• a®dePne the e~eatettl ara~ to pertnll ~.oass or dralnape, et the ease maybe. 10. tt Is sper~aRy Pntartded ~l the dg1tN, bencflts, std ilsbUldes rzeated hlaeuc>fler aftab run t'dCa the ananore P'rapr~ty end the C~teratee'B Prvpeaty eatd may Doty be used by the Page 4 of 8 ORIGINAL ~ECEIVEp Q~C 0 61[-06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Deacrlpelora: @tnedPds,~.G Dootuaont°BOOk.lasge 24456.667 ,Pagel 4 of I3 Older: 051?1026 Comment: 1'2/05/2006 10:56 i273B45979 PAr,E 06/18 • PIts~C.LAS CaSrtdTTY FL OFF. REC. BK &. 5 AR 679 -r. otmets o! ell a mry part of the !ee slrrple ~ b the banahiQa ar dornintard estate, ana d,eU rte employees, agents, lessees, tarrants, patrons, gtresls end !nNtaaa. To dta extent that elfJrer f~N ~~, translate or Wnveys Its rights a enllUetneMe under thb Aetenmemt, ec the pnspeRy owned Dy such petty. whe!har M wttote a In part, lien ftte as96grta~e a ~tmassor, sa . Adtall Da Qeertted M pe bto grantor a L?+tattea as appibaftle far pirrpoaet of this t~gteetrtenf b dta etdertl or each patty's styrests. WAhot-t Bm!Hng Ste faegofng, aedt party eheS have the right to hdr tidlte end t#mtttiolts hereunder to a ottndomlraum taasaaafian or ptnpaAy owners t3saootatron tRetttea by such parry w19t hest ~ ~ ptt7pelty. 11. f~AXrdtt$ive F~seetent. Fite esmatrtattte g~tad h2raurutef ere had tutc&teke d outer uses ~ Grattan Gratt~a ar any d tlteU rive suxe~ora, yAr!dt do Trot untea9on~ly h4etfere ttiQt the t~hts seared here§t, but strati not etdlrtguksh eery ttUMs of ~y person, In~utSh~ Oren{or, as may be established fn the atoten>`nUated CvndorninGnn D2dtwtion. 12. uoa! _ There tae no other sgreemsrtts a plomieaa by Grenbr or Orontes etmapt es Ily ~t torttt herein wltl- respect to ~ ea®en-errt'e. No otberafkna, changes, tnot~sat'ona a tarrortdrrtenb shell oe made fp tills A®teentenf osoapt x~dt die ttrtfdan oansent o! Ste f3rarriea and d+o Gr~nbor end f3refr res~ltae eteenessors. t3. ~@g. Atgr ttatiaes rttgttfted satder Ihts Agrtretnant tdtaH De in waking end abet be etcher hand ddhrt~ or traatemld~ by triad or tegteeased rt+s6, paslaga pee.pa{d ~ Datum t+sOSfpt tt:quttale5 ro C>r b- rite preemDle m Ih~ ~amertt, in the event Stet rsff~n is gitan ~ pref ~ thtt panogrogh, then ew:h rw6oa eha@ ba deem im have bosh giv®t± ari the deb ad tr?teipt bV Ae parer b it Wee edtke~d. 94, Fitxide Cor-tracL bhta hgreantenl shall he deemed es F~t6dm C,otttract and eonstrtrad s.oordtng to fhe lero+s or such elate, ragardbea of vq~tliar tfib F~goomont b baby axoaab by e„y of tlro pS$0S tt@tr?t6 In 09isr 4t7~S a DthetMicB. tS. ~<iw~. ibis ~teeentanf shall bt= eoieddve eS of the date the Gamtmr and Gr~tfae I~tK natty ®xewieet t1i1e Ayrrernant. t6, Ida, Oranttx heretry bards tlaed. Im heirs, k9~ teves rraid tssaigns to waafatK a:ta fa^at~er defend the tetrovat~atibad en4 Aghde unb G+enmm, ~ t and ~ ~tdit9t every palest Mrmnsoe~er tegatlgy Getnang Or ao atom eta sertte a any pmt tFieteaf, by, ttsvti9h or antler t3rantor. {3ratda hn$rer txveetan4e That Gnarttor v+,is ~ convey enp other tteeernent ar wnflit3i+tg righlt: widiln Ste tees tmvered by ti>;a Aereemeta. t3rantee hereby Wnde Itsed, ttrd fts ttutxxrosata eta! t~7gns, b wetrent an0 lonever do0efid the ttbovadespibQd ettseittent d8~ until 6raNfar, lOs aucaeaeore-and oeatq+rs, ®geln9f every parson wttomsasvar IatuMtlq adrMng ar m arm ore soma or any part thereat. TD WAY AWO TO HOLD the ttfbrententtt>ated eaaettterrs ere heretry grartled unb Grmttae tlnd Grantor, for tl1a use t'iid beneRt 00 Grantee end ~fenrd(, and their reeaeofJve 81tD~860rb and 885~n6, tT tS Fl1RTHER LlNQERSTt~ At4D RGREEO tlta! t3tmtmr an8 t3rsntea cna thnfr tcsp..--sine, halve, siri~saota, rontrma and ins, iri no way asaumo any daDlilty a r~ponalWtlry fo die other ~ eheil Page t3ot9 ORIGINAL RECENEa DEC 0 6 2~0~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DeBCript:tan: PSae2lae,PL IDocurnene-Dook.pwgs 14166.667 Page! 5 oP 13 ordmr: 05121026 cottuaent: 12!05/2006 10:56 7273845979 • P1NmLiA4 CO(Jh'TY F& OFF. REC. BP( •5 PC3 67Z be i~ld hsrtMaaa by (he oNer -ar any dar~sye a UabYitj emti~d ar Ndtned by bl¢ public and Mara slmtaady dNatad, a any other Psi u~ng the easement enac by tnvTiBb0n ham Gear6ag ee Granter, der R ba sTV1i8a8ad at imp><ed. IN HATN£SS Vti'HEREOF, Caantor and Greattee have ast thatr hands and Est; an ~®dey ersd year first above wAtten. ~~ SigneA, saeied end deltrered ®REW PARK, LLC, s Ebo4da 4lmtted In Ilfe p~seiua of lit~llity cOmpBr-y ~Y; JES Pro nc., e n Aa A9en ~~ ~ nl Nerrut' . yd e M (SEAL) Prktt Nam- 17 Erb, GRAfdTL-E: f31ua 1f®ron, tf.C, 8 Florida tim(ted Ilab€'iity ~ntpany Print Name: BY•_ Tsata E ~®~ay, oQad~ar fSf:A°-) PMt Prsrne: SiAFE OF FtORlDA ) COUNTY OF t the faegalr~ ~mant was s~rta+Aed~9 Dekra ms ~ ,~ Bay of 2005, Dy Ovuptae d. YVedaard, ~ Prealdent of J!~S Prvpefllae, Iota, a FioP{~ eoepar~an, hAsto ~ Member od 13Rew Perk, l.lC, a Fkuida Imllsa Beblllty amnpt~y. on Behan of satd corny. Me 19 per, w me or hag p~duc®d as trienfr(wa0on. AM Narita' Nolery PtttrOc far 31ate 6f 6da (SEAL! my C~~ton E~InDS; Page 6 of 9 ~t .~wro s maro ~e • PAGE 07/1B ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 0 6 2(~~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER De®crfption: 91ae21ea,&'L AocwaBAt-~aok.Pa~ 14466.567 PagBr 6 OF 23 Order: 651?10?6 Comm®at: 12/0512©d6 1E~:56 i2738459i9 • ~ZriELLAB COUtdTY fL OFF. RIvC. Bx ',. ~,6 9(@ 673 . ''' be held hemYese by the oihse for ar~y damage or Rat>~il~ suffered or Incurted by dlo pub9c ®nd others dmllaAy siluabed, or any otlrer pgraDn uB(np ~® easement areas by 6~ledor+ from Orange ~ Grantor, Wn6lhef ii be e~resxE ar hated. t~ ~!I!*I~S w;'EP,.~, G Antar arm f~„w q~ amt ~ ;,ran;sa and seals on "vte ®~ end year Brat above wtitlsn. QEKkTOR: Signed, sealed and delivered BREW PART` LLC, a Florida Iknl~d in the presenco ol; p~l(Y ~rep~y BY' JES Propsrees, Inc., a Flotlde ~irporaUDn As Maraplnp 4~1eTiber Print Name: ~y: Doupias J, Wollend, President (S~j PdM Nsme: GR~4TE~: 91ue Herea, @F.C, a Rar~9a athHE9118tftkty rnmpnny ®y:_ .. s .. ae- mta De4e E. 8kehkp, @Asnepe Print Name: l.,~n.,,,~ ,... STATE OF FLdAIDA ) COUNTY OF 1 The fo~Oinp inslrurrtanl was ~DUrlsdg¢d before me title ~ day at .2003, by Douglas !~ YMeiisnd, ®s President oP JE9 lWage~ae, inc, ®fbrsda wrporef~r, ~ Atena~rtg t~tembsr of Draw Park, U.C, a FPoMa smiled naWSry awnpany. an behaM of aeid.XVnpaoy. Ile [c petsonelty tvrom ~ me or has produoed as hientl~atbn. PrLd Npmp~ Notary PubbC for 6mte of F1ada& (~~l Mp tbn E~tn3s: Page t3 of 9 PAGE 06/1B ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 0 6 2[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF GLEARWATER Deecrtpt~Otf: P!-taellae,FL Document-9ooh,page 2AQ66.667 Page: 7 of 23 ~rdes; D5121026 CoDmiaat: 12/05/2066 16:56 723845979 PAGE 69/18 • • PIPIELLAS COUNTY FL DFP. REC. 8a ;S PG 678 i.~. 3tAtE OF FLORIDA ` ) COUtdTY OF Q ii N 4~1~4_ ) M the tor~oing mawment aae adu-a~l~dgec boiora m~ ~~ 4 ~f~r OI _~ u ~ y . 32Q5, Qy Dale E, Q~aeklep, ea Manege~ of 9tuo Heron, LLC, a Flar{da 6rri~d 118biPry com~sny on DeAaB of aald aomvenY. ke b Deraor~al kr~vm b me a hea pa~uced as eSee~igtlon. ol. ~oaa~cT~ ~obry PobBc br 6~ of Flohda (SFAI) ~~„~ yGammisstane~kas: ~.~~'`ai v ~e.n At.•~- Pepe z or9 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~(; ~ 6 205 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Description: PlnaIles,PL Daeumenc-BO~k.Fage 24966.667 Fag®; 8 of I? Orders oSIZ.Y026 Caarnane: 1.2/65/2666 16:56 7273845979 PArE 16/1B ~. • • • FZ[6£LF AB COtll~72Y FL QFF. F2EC. HK ~• )S PCt 6~5 i iii ~; ,t81NDE Tta urWo~olgnoe ha0bi a~,®a std a ~ O,a I~r of ®AloR®ego an tl» 6ranbr'a as6lhat Cis urt~sigrted A~eby ply h end ~senta to C-e faegolnq Grant of Fri aft subord'wa~s ks Ci vffytyo w ~lo L'S'v"6~u0(i uimcOf. Cn{onlat Rana, a fbfidQ banhin®oospo ~9 DY ~J~1I 4/9R1B; ~td®pA@~Q N. ~1L4G8~li® . 5TRTE OF ~(~ COUPfTV dF Tire fcrt9~oina Iq~6trtrmrd e:eg tok ~ before ~ ~~~,`, 4r~y Qf ~ . ~OQS, by, .r~.'~ef~i~eld~ .~_~-~°n,~,/ ~~glQarrF~'C.~krnlnl6mn~a eFl~cor~xedsr+, e<! A°~tO_~ of B~i.^!!!~.^.j'• 6Jn k ~-s„N~r ko~ ~ ,an nr h,~~r~enrd ~ l4enlth.~tlott. /~ r P88B 6 Of ORIGINA! RECEIVEQ f~~C d 6 2t~~fi PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DeaOription: Piaellsa,Pa Doewaent-~ook.Pege 18QB6,S69 Page: 9 Of I3 Older: 0522Y026 Comment: 12!0512006 10:56 72738459/9 PACE 11/18 P7NEtLP3 COUNTY FL OPF. REC. Ali ',:6 @G 6?ti ~1PdDF.t~ ®CQH$EHT OCIATION The un0~sigited hen3by t~fles t»at h is prtiperly vmm'a aa'ociatlon esbb0aRO4 by tlra OR&w PROF~SSIONAt PARK 0.~rJaralian of Cadnm;nlum on 1ha Grar~fs PfvpeRy an9 Shat th uroesslg~d heeBby }sloe In and OOFlSB the fatBgoing Grent°I Easemetres. ' Dvew Pt°iMel°nal irk Candorrdn lafaan, 1ne., ®florida ptofil Cotpo -----... By: Name' Dvu J, nd, ®n! (SF.~sLf i,.~^~' Print N8nnj: !tom 1 STATE f~ Ft 1DA ' ) COi)NTY OF Ths fotsgdng h~nrtn2rtt was ac~naModpa6 tare ate fills .~ day °l.y,,., gip, hY €9ou~iae .s. -~ttmnd, w Predd~nt of Draw Peefoact°nat Park CotsQ°tnla)ern fiCOd:latl°m,UnC., s fe0rkia a& itx pmt ~putati°n, mo behalf °f aeld ~A~Y: fie t3 pereors~ ro me or E~ praEuu~' as Idenof~siion. i. PAnt Name• Noterp Pubtictor safe a da (sl=at) Foy Canre~+sa>a+ Exphea~ .mcaraassar~ ~~ w~ ~a fa °f s ORIGINAL RECENEQ DEC 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER Dm®crd~kdoa: Pine22fl®,PL Docur~ont°Book.Page 144S6.S69 ease: 10 of Y9 Orden 0522R02i Cozener 12/05/2006 10:56 7273B459i9 PAGE ].2/i8 • 9YN81LLA8 COUNTY FL OFF, REC. BK '; ~6 PG 677 exHt~tx °a° A replet of a portion of Lot H and ell of Lots I, J end K, Rolling Heights, aeco~ing to the Pint thereof, as rxordod m Ylat !took s3, kegs t, of the Pubtte Recor6s of Ptnettaa County, Florida, boing mono ptu4iculazly dtxdbed es follows: Coromeociag to the southvatet comor of aforoaaid Lot C, Ftollirtg Heights; thence norther{y, along the evert boundary of said Lot C, rho tottowutg thaaa (3} oo:uaes; 11} North 00 dogzooa 24'36" E, a dlatenee of 38.12 fat b a po{nt of curve to the leA, (2} non}teriy along said curve to Ne left, Oaving a radius 29D,00 fbet, an utm of ] 49.96 tbet, a ahoM of 148.17 fee end a chord bearing o€ North 05 dogreea 03'27"W ro n palm of curve to the r1gAt, (3} norihwosteriy along said curve to rho v~ght, havsng a radius of 220.00 feet, en an; of 29.99 Coot, a chord of 79.97 Ret and a shored bearing of Nort}t 2G degrees 06°Sg"W, to tAe norfhereel eomoY of tmad Iar C; th~tco S g4 dag~ 41'15"13, along the north boundarioa of tafort~aid Lola C, D, ®, F, Q trrfd H, Railing Heights, s distance of 4 i 1,27 foal to the point of beginniag; ffierux cantirtue 3 g9 degrees 81' 1 S'~ along the north Erotutdaries of nforosa~d 4ota fi ~d !, R~1lag Heists, a aLneata: of {76.42 feor t}t~tce North 54 degavas 34'40"B, alertg the Rerttter~Y bour:datias of e&,. tar , t d Its u t~ ..t ~e c ..a ~~e ^s .Pas K- F.c -a aiy ~ s die: ;,w .,, ..~e.ss .~; to dts au-.,Y~cr~, coma of said tAt K; thoteoe S 6M degrGa 22' 14"W, aloztg the east boundery o4 geld Lot Y., a distance of 358.37 fret m the soutiteest comer of said Lot K; t}rtnao Notch 89 degeea 22'51 "W, along the south Bot®derles oP afbreaak9 Lots Fd, f, 1 and K, Rotting Heigitte, s di,oronce of ?AO 4R feat; thence NoM Ot) degmes 37'09"'~, n distance of 249.75 fat to the point of begiartiag; 3ttid lands having bean cavtxtcd to oondo[aiuitun otvntntthip pursteaat to Dcclarotlon of CondomWum 6or DiBPW PROP&SgtONAL PARK - PFYASA t, A CCDTYDOh91NfUM, rotmtdet4 do E9A Bonk t 31gt, pago 1Tt 6 of the FuDtic Rt~orda o4'Pittetlaa County, Florida and u roflxted in PI®E thereof raordsd fn Ptat Aoott 130, Page ®0 of said rocotde, ORIGINAL. RECENEQ DEC 0 6 2(!06 PLANY OF CLEARWA ER I C IDaACrtptfon: Pfn®11na,PL DoctrmenC-eook.FSO'e Z4t166.6b7 PBge: ZZ of 23 OrQatr: P522Z 026 (.'Orr@tAaC: . ;2!©5/2E~~,6 1@: 56 721384597° PAVE 13/18 • • PINBLLAS tJOUNTX FL OFF, REC. BK ~ P6 G70 fT '6° Lots ~ 90 E, P. C sod a parttom o8 Yid Ti; of fEoitiug adelg6b, ea rccotcted! fu i'dot Book 43 orr A°oge 1 of fbe pu6tle Atecore9e e!P(melle,s Caaaty, f+toridA aaJ be(u$ tlort6er Sner~L¢Q as Iblbwa: Boeta ad th®Narshceroet aoraer of odd Lot Cd QEre®e¢ oboe ties T)oeth I[ms of aAs3 Lass C, fD, _ ~, P, fs aar- as ~ont6 ®~ d¢grees 61,0!0°' host, ford 1129 had la t8e Ptae4hwcet eoroermf tPtA f flot4ah. peapeRy described to PLas¢ a wttidia the plat of nresp etoSrsa4aaat4 earst•rt-mae f, a Cuodur,ialuw wnJ rocordud to Gbndomlafum F[nt Hoolc iH6 oe ~mQae 811 rWrovgn dS wf dbm Pub(t¢ keeanta of Ftadlai Coeaty, Bsoddes f6t:na fls[tg iLo Woos Iloa of Aetd prapar[Ny Bousti tt0 d~row 36'x410 Wmt, fnc 104,99 Seel to ttu idatalo rlgl~t-of-svgy Uae of Deesr Bue:t (be)e0a rsgbt~ftray 14+x1 fa ltm fast fe wldih); iLeeea oteag oahJ MgBtoLtotay Itoo, o®d boing ebe 6enefaQ vptbn,nnq Iln¢ fwr ebfs dm¢atp[1o6, rYorite td9 deECOSe 32°3I°' Wwt, fdr 599.60 f§~ea to tfi®BSt9e e4ghe-o4-l~ep kse os,~ona Asanue(t~6ng a r9gkt~sP~sey abae ~ 60 fees ie widlh~; [he~¢ee e{eEiq w,Ed ~raet eGgLQ.aGleay (Iae t1er4 Coti~.ag c6itnr (9j eonraesr (jj fheuee 1~ors : 00 d¢g~ 2:'at<" F.~asc, far 9g.aP foes 60 oh®poscs of e~evatueo sssh a ct:raa cosea^ra w ioE °u4-oi1dS'wdT li) 1116®eG Eiyr1Y6EBy ~'®,p~ 696 lrC Elf ®Ai~ etl0'$B a:8 `Pend 6 ~Y1ESl~ Of LQd.V V leaf, • eeotrae,engte o4 SO etegroae 41'0410, ea ax saugtE oPf®9.99 (4et meet a euont Aeseteg Norfla C4 derrteea 9g'a611 Wat, far -4®.E6 feet Bo the pofat of erraesa eHrva9ncm r:ItE a aurvs emaetlaa !0 8be yfonL•ensp (9) Ytt¢aoa TVorSGea9y atoog tiso er. of atotd eearoo 4tarkug a eaf86ua of 210.00 feet, a ceoteas aap}e of 7 degeees ~3°0St"0 ea ere leagQk 0170.29 feel aatl a c@orof booetng t°rort[r 2ti Uegeeea EA'P)'° west, [br 5056 dtie t~ tLe IObte°e ear Re~ieuteaG. ORIGINAL RECENEQ DCC 0 6 Z~Ofi PLANNING DEPARTMEN ~ CITY OF CLEARWATEi~ Description: piaeIlea,sG Docua~ent-8ook.pag® 346&6.669 peg®: 12 of ~3 fJS®oarr t)612E0?6 Coa1[neAt: 1.2/H5/20E~6 1:56 7273845979 • PTAd~i.Lfi$ GOITkTY ~'L OFF. REC . BK i'.: ',6 @d 679 ~ ~ `~j m e~ i ~I~ ~,@ . ~ I;~ a 6RY. ~~ f' b ~~ • ! ~ .~ ~'~ °~! Bnio~eo •nd Aet¢nc.loo r ~~ ~ eReeeet °c• ~ e ~' s l,~fi~ B 0 oc S a PAGE 14/18 ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 0 6 2[06 PLANNING DEPARTMEN'! CITY OF CLEARWATER A®eartptionr P4neIIea,PL UOCU[aene-Book. Page 1Q666.667 Dcg®: 19 0~ 83 Order: DS3880?6 Caimmenr: 1il21128Qo 1:52 S _ ~ i~ t, r. ~~ , .: ,,~ ,.... •. /273845474 Pre~s~a~ed by grad wll~eoa B°ESOi'7~~~~p8~ }L'p~A$~ty~; ~Qi7:~7~g A p~ ~p ~~~1 V 1S eD. 6'' Ci~Fi91`Ny'YGl~y F o~. 193~~-C T.J.S, ~ig~sway ~9 I~ort6 SaBite ~Q3 Glea€~~a6e~, ~`~ 3374 ~~~5 g~1RKE, E~.ERQ6 Q~F ~o@!Rt I~IFdELL105 ~pi,dAtTti F~.Oid4D~ IRgX1F 200gg~A0~4 '~®t04120Q5 dE 06:54 ~(~ OFF RED ~EE~ 6tEC®R®I C:5 S76 5m g3~eTy6~• ~~ Parce6'T'~x )tD# Q7-29- 6-76446-000-~®6d; J Q7-~9-1<6-7~4~6-1900-1<~Q; ®7-29-T6-?5446-000-090; 07-~9-T6-7~i446-000-1? Sl~~~°&~.IG ~?A~~.~?~Tr~ ~~~n PAGE C~2/D5 TF-IIS SP~CI;AL ~AI~.A.T~17'~ e`~FED, Made this ~ day° of Septe~i~bez, ~CJ6, by gf,t~ I$I:?~,ON, ~,.L.C., a l?Iori.da limited liability eoanpaa:y ("Gran4o.r"}, in favor X340 D~ S'F, I.,LC, a Florida limited liability coraapan,y, whose address is 965 S. l3ayshote 13Ivd., Safety Harbor, FL 34695 ~"Grantee"}. ~,NITIaTESSETH, that Crrantor, I'o.r and in consideration of tl~e sum of Ten and t~0/I00 Dollars, and other vat~eable coatsidet-ations, lawful. znos~ey of the Ur~.ited States of Arn,eri;.a, to it in hand paid 3y Grarbtec, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged; has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed to Cirartiee, i.ts successors and assigns fazevWr, all of the f©tlo~wing descz~.bed lid ia~ Pinellas bounty, FO.orida ("Property"): That certain, real property wliicla is mare particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto a.nd incorporated herein by tFais reference, together with all ~ xtures, improvements and appurtenances thereunto appertaining; TQ IdA.~IF A;vID TO I-if?LIJ the above-described prerrtises, with the appurtenances, unto Gragitee, ifs successors arsd ass,igras, .in fee siaaaple f©rever. And the ~,rantor does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Property is free from all. liens and encumbrances except those sei forth oat Exhibit B attached F~ereta; And Grantor does~ereby_fu_lly warrant the tide to the Property, and_~.vill defend the same against the lawful clai.ens of all persons claiming by, through. or ursder it, but~against none other. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2[~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER f ,~ r 11/21/2006 10:52 723845979 PAtaE 031'ri5 ~ • IN VdITNESS ~Jf-II;REOF, Grantor lzms executed this deed under seal an the date aforesaid. Signed,seaicd and delivered in the presence of: BLUE HERON, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company ~? ~.___- ,~ ~~ ., By: ~~ Si lure of itne s # J Dale E. Bleakley ~`!~'.~ ~,~-'1'1r~.,--v~__I.ts: Managing Member Typed/Printed Name of ~74.r;Qness #I ~, Address:. g r . W' ss #~2 3870 Tampa Road #~E j ~ ~y_~~ ~;Idst~ar, F'L 3577 Typed/P inted Warne of Witness #2 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNT' OF PINI/LILAS -~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~~ day of >4,~ ~~~,, 2006, by .Date E. Bleakley; as Managing .Member of Blue Heron, L.L.C., a Flor~ic~a limited liability company, on behalf of the company. He is personally known to me. GRANTOR: to u to of Florida {NOTARY SEAL) a 3o Lyee~ .l~rezak e Cosns~tu4oa ~ OE1266729 `~~~ E~pl~e~ F®bruary 1T, 2008 8mg161R1/ F1M1 • IMyrp~.lro. 6G608640fB Printed name: b L ,~o2.c. IOQy COmrr115510r1 Expires: ~`~~~ ~~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 ~lOV 2 9 2006 P CIN OF CLEARWA ERT 11/2112i~~36 i6: 52 7273~d59i° PAr,E P4/G~5 EXH~IBTT f6A" Lots C, D, E, P, G and a portion of Lot EI, ROLLING 1-iEI01-IT"S, as recorded. in Plat Book 43 on Page 1 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and being further described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Lot C; thence along the North line of said Lots C, D, E, F, G and 1-l, South 89 deg 41' 10" East, for 411.27 feet to the Northwest corner of that certain property described as Phase 1 within the plat of 1~rew Professional Park-Phase I, a Condominium and recorded in Condominium Plat Boole 130 on Pages 80 inrocagh 85 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence slang the West Line of said. property South 00 deg 3b' 14" West, for 209.99 feet to the North right-o.f•--way line of Dtew Street (being aright-of way that is 100 feet in width); thence along said right-of--way Line, and being the bearing reference fine for this description, North 89 deg 22' S1" West, for 357.60 feet to the East right-of--way line of !lnna Avenue (being aright-of--way that is 60 feet .in width}; thence along said East right-of--way line the following three (3) corarses: (1) thence North 00 deg 22' I4" East, for 38.11 feet to the point of curvature v,!ith a curve concave to the Southwest; (2) thence No: tl?erly along the arc of said curve having a radius of 280.00 feet, a central angle of 30 deg 4l' 42", an arc length of 1.49.95 reef a-~d a chord bearing No*gh, 14 cleg 5$' lb" 'hest, far 148..86 feet to the point of reverse ctu vature with a curve concave to the Northeast; (3) thence i~tortherly along the arc of said curve having a radius of 220.00 feet, a central angle of 7 d.eg 53' 19", an arc lezt,gth of 30.29 feet and a chord bearing North 2G deg 22' 17" West, for 30.26 feet to the Point of Beginning, ORIGINAL RECEIVED f~~V 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEp,RWATER lli2Ii2666 15:52 72/3645979 PAGE 05/65 EXH1131T "F3" t , ~ .~ a,.. 1, ',d ~ a~, ~nn~ fwd a~~,cnn, ono General 4r S~3GC{Fs.i taxes t3t'id aSSESSiifLiitS r`C{iiircv ~v u~ ~%.eu iii use year. ~u~.. 5.....,..y.! years. 2. Easements, as described in instrument recorded in O.R. book 14466, Page 667, of the Public • records of Pinellas County, Florida, assigned, to Grantee on even date herewith. 3. Restrictions as contained in. instrument recorded in O. R. Book 4114, Page 694, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~ V 2 9 2[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • I •; J ' Grew C!f f ice Par. }; Cori~..e_yance Swale Capacity - 2/3 1/~ V= 1 ~u r S I --N - --- ~ ,~ _ ~i ~ f r = K = 4 = 5 .~; J 1.~ L ~ _ _.1_.- ~ `! (. `, 1 (. (? ~' ? W '7 ~} . 5 (. b 2 9 ? (. 1 ~i. i.) _ ~ . 6 t p s .0~ ~~ ~~ = V A = r; .. 5 (~) =• 2 ~ . ~I ~ i, f ~; (~; ~~a,_1:1. ~~ C a p a c i. t. ti~ 1 N[ax F'1ow 'I'o Swale i\ = 5GQ 210 = 2 . "% acx~s ~? = C.i.A. - .73 (6.4) ('?.'I) - 12.u ct<~ Capacity of Swale (::%t= . 4r..•f;) e._ce:ed maximum flc~~•>> to swap (J_? . b cf,:~ .. system is ade7uate. ORIGINAL RECEII/ED IVOV 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN '' ~' "•~y CITY OF CLEARV.~'ER~,Ii ' 1, .) I ~;,~' °`y:. ~' '~1/ r~ ~~ ~V~~ K ~~ ' • • ~. ~~, . r Drew Street Office Center Storm~~rater Clc . ' s Existing Data Total Area = 3.97ac - .31 ac (NE corner & easement) = 3.66ac Impervious: Existing Bldg. = 0.020ac Existing Conc. Slab = 0.046ac Existing Pavement = 0.470ac 0.536ac x 1 credit as allowed by City =.268ac 2 Existing C: .268 x i.0 = .268 3.392 0.2 = .741 3.66 ac 0.946 Existing C = 0.946 = 25.9 3.66 Existing CN: .268 x 98 = 26.264 ` 3.392 x 84 = 284.928 (D-soil, contour, Good) 3. 660ac 31/ • /92 Existing CN: 311.192= 85.03 3.66 Existing tc = 860' = 610 sec = 10.2 minutes use 15 minutes (min) .141 ft/sec S = 64-30 = 3.950 860 .5 V = .71 (3.95) =1.41 C N for SWFWMD = .536 ac x 98 = 52.528 + 3.124 ac x 84 =262.416 3.660 314.944 Cn = 314.944 = 86.05 3. 6 6 ORIGINAL RECENED P~v / 2 9 2[06 MANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ r • ~ Proposed Data Total Area = 3.97ac - .31ac (NE corner& easement} = 3.66ac Impervious: - Parking & Drive Sidewalk& _ Dempster pads = 1.722 ac B~~ildings = 0.770 ac Pond & weir = 0.118 ac Total Impervious 2.610 ac Proposed~C: 2.610 x 1.0 = 2.610 1.05 x 0.2 = 0.210 3.660ac. 2.820 Proposed C = 2.820 = 0.77 3.66 Proposed CN: 2.610 x 98 = 255.78 1.050 x 73 = 88.20 3.660ac 343.98 Proposed CN: 343.98 = 94.0 3.66 Proposed tc = 15 minutes (min} Impervious Phase I + Phase 2 Asphalt 0.719 ac 0.877 ac = 1.596 ac Bldg 0.472 ac .Q.298 ac = 0.770 ac Sw 0.068 ac 0.058 ac = 0.126 ac Pond @ weir 0.118 ac - = 0.118 ac 2.610 ac ORIGINAL RECEIVED N~'~ 2 9 2[~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER F ! ~ • Pond Data EL. (ft} Area Volume (sf} (acres} (cf} 43.0 4,028 0.093 0 44.0 4,875 0.112 4,452 45.0 5,802 0.133 9,791 46. 0 6, 796 0. i56 16, 0090 First 1" Treatment Volume of net area = _5 x(3.97ac- .310ac} 2 12 = 0.153 ac-ft = 6,643 cf Set weir at bottom + 1" treatment = E1. 44.44 feet (minimum} 2 Set weir @ 44.44 S.H.W.T, ranges from 47'-6.5' = 40.5' TO 41.5'-5' or 36.5' use 39.5' Water Table ranges from 47' -9.5' = 37.5' to 41.6' - 10' or 31.6' Use 36.5' 2 .5 2 .5 Equi .Tai eat T.ongth = ~ ~- { P - a -- t~ ti = X40 + X40 - a { 160an ; 2 4 h ~2 4 3 2 2 .5 Equiv. L = 1170+ (28.900 - 21 453 = 170 + 86 = 128 feet 2 2 Equiv W = 170 - 86 = 42 feet 2 Horiz Permeability = 9.5 Ft/day Vertical Permeability = 6 Ft/day ORIGINA! RECEIVED ~C~J 2 9 2006 PiANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PONDS 1/ersion 3.2.0108 ~Fetention Pond Recovery - Refened Meth Copyright 2000 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Project Data Project Name: Simulation Description: Project Number: Engineer Supervising Engineer: Date: Aquifer Data DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 25YR. 24NR. STORM EVENT 01 HOFMANN HOFMANN 12-17-02 Base Of Aquifer Elevation, [Bj (ft datum): Water Table Elevation, [WTJ (ft datum): Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, [Kh] (ft/day): Fillable Porosity, [nj (°!°): Unsaturated Vertical Infiltration Rate, [Ivj (ft/day): Maximum Area For Unsaturated Infiltration, [Avj (ft~: Geometry Data Equivalent Pond Length, [L] (ft): 128.0 Equivalent Pond Width, [VI(j (ft): 42.0 Ground water mound is expected to intersect the pond bottom Stage vs Area Data Stage (ft datum) 43.00 44.00 45.00 46.00 Area (ft~j 4028.0 4875.0 5802.0 6796.0 36.50 39.50 9.50 31.00 6.0 6796.0 ORIGINAL RECENED ~~~' 2 9 2Q06 PCITY OF CLEARWATER.~' DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 01-23-2001 09:22:34 Page 1 ' + PONDS Version 3.2.0108 i~ntion Pond Recovery - Rei'tned fVietho Copyright 2000 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Discharge Structures Discharge Structure #1 is active as weir Structure Parameters Description: RECTANGULAR WEIR Weir elevation, (ft datum): 44.44 Weir coefficient: 3.33 Weir length, (ft): 3.5 Weir exponent: '! .5 Tailwater -disabled, free discharge Discharge Structure #2 is irtiactive Discharge Structure #3 is inactive ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~'~ 2 9 2L~06 PLANNING DEPARTMEN? CITY OF CLEARWATER DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 01-23-2001 09:22:35 Page 2 ' ~ PONDS i/ersion 3.2.0108 ntion Pond Recovery -Refined Metho Copyright 2000 ' Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Scenario Input Data Scenario 1 :: TREATMENT VOLUME Hydrograph Type: Slug Load Modflow Routing: Routed with infiltration Treatment Volume (ft~ 6643 Initial ground water level (ft da#um) default, 39.50 Time After Time After Storm Event Storm Event (aays> (says) 0.100 2.000 0.250 2.500 0.500 3.000 1.000 3.500 1.500 4.000 Scenario 2 :: PRE-DEVELOPED 25 YR STORM Hydrograph Type: Inline SCS • Modflow Routing: Not routed Repetitions: 1 Basin Area (acres) 3.660 Time Of Concentration (minutes) 15.0 DCIA (%) 0.0 Curve Number 86.05 Design Rainfall Depth (inches) 9.0 Design Rainfall Duration (hours) 24.0 Shape Factor UHG 256 Rainfall Distribution SCS Type II Florida Modified Initial ground water level (ft datum) default, 39.50 No times after storm specified. Scenario 3 :: POST DEVELOPED 25 YR. 24i-lR STORM Hydrograph Type: Inline SCS Modflow Routing: Routed with infiltration Repetitions: 1 Basin Area (acres) 3.660 Time Of Concentration (minutes) 15.0 DCIA (%) 0.0 Curve Number 94 Design Rainfall Depth (inches) 9.0 Design Rainfall Duration (hours) 24.0 Shape Factor UHG 256 Rainfall Distribution SCS Type II Florida Modified Initial ground water level (ft datum) default, 39.50 No times after storm specified. ORIGINAL RECENED NOV 2 9 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT GIN OF CLEARWATER DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 01-23-2001 09:22:35 Page 3 ` PONDS i/ersion 3.2.0708 Retention Pond Recovery -Refined IVlethod~ Copyright 2000 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 7 :: TREATMENT VOLUME Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft'/s) (ft3) Stage Minimum 0.000 39.50 Maximum 0.002 44.43 Inflow Rate -Maximum -Positive 0.002 1107.1670 Rate -Maximum -Negative None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 0.002 6643.0 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 96.000 6643.0 Infiltration Rate -Maximum -Positive 0.002 0.2798 Rate -Maximum -Negative None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 2.400 3164.5 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 96.000 6643.0 Combined Discharge Rate -Maximum -Positive None None Rate -Maximum -Negative None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 96:000 0.0 Discharge Structure 1 -simple weir Rate -Maximum -Positive None None Rate -Maximum -Negative None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 96.000 0.0 Discharge Structure 2 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive ~ disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 36.000 0.00 6643.0 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72.000 0.00 6643.0 ORIGINAL RECENED ~~~V 2 9 2606 PLANNING DEPARTMENfi CITY OF CLEARWATER DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 01-23-2001 09:22:35 Page 4 PONDS 1/ersion 3.2,0'i08 ~tention Pond Recovery -Refined AOetho Copyright 2000 Devo Seereeram, Ph,D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 2 :: PRE-DEVELOPED 25 YR STORM Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3/s} (ft3) Stage Minimum Not Available Not Available Maximum Not Available Not Available Inflow Rate -Maximum -Positive 12.067 14.0545 Rate -Maximum -Negative None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 25.467 97085.2 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 25.533 97085.2 Infiltration Rate -Maximum -Positive Not Available Not Available Rate -Maximum -Negative Not Available Not Available Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive Not Available Not Available Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative Not Available Not Available Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation Not Available Not Available Combined Discharge Rate -Maximum -Positive 12.067 14.0545 Rate -Maximum -Negative None None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 25.467 97085.2 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 25.533 97085.2 Discharge Structure 1 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 2 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled disabled Discharge Structure 3 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. N.A. ORIGINAL RECENED ~~~~ 2 9 2(-06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 01-23-2001 09:22:35 Page 5 PONDS Wersion 3.2.0108 ntion Pond Recovery -Refined Metho Copyright 2000 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Summary of Results :: Scenario 3 :: POST DEVELOPED 25 YR. 24HR STORM Time Stage Rate Volume (hours) (ft datum) (ft3/s) (ft') Stage Minimum 0.000 39.50 Maximum 12.133 45.56 Inflow Rate -Maximum -Positive 12.067 Rate -Maximum -Negative None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 25.467 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 25.533 Infiltration Rate -Maximum -Positive 10.600 Rate -Maximum -Negative None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 25.533 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 25.533 Combined Discharge Rate -Maximum -Positive 12.133 Rate -Maximum -Negative None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 25.467 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 25.533 Discharge Structure 1 -simple weir Rate -Maximum -Positive 12.133 Rate -Maximum -Negative None Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive 25.467 Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative None Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation 25.533 Discharge Structure 2 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled Discharge Structure 3 -inactive Rate -Maximum -Positive disabled Rate -Maximum -Negative disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Positive disabled Cumulative Volume -Maximum Negative disabled Cumulative Volume -End of Simulation disabled Pollution Abatement: 36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. 72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume N.A. N.A. 15.1393 None 109928.6 None 109928.6 0.6449 None 15639.0 None 15639.0 13.7871 None 87610.8 None 87610.8 13.7871 None 87610.8 None 87610.8 disabled disabled disabled disabled disabled disabled disabled disabled disabled disabled N.A. N.A. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NO~J 2 9 2[~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT " CITY OF CLEARWATER DREW STREET OFFICE CENTER 01-23-2001 09:22:36 Page 6 _ A n d rey E ~ /y ~ ~ ®~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ,u,/ ~j 1 ' f ~ ~ ^ ST. PETERSBURG OFFfCE 3740 54th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33714 727-527-5735 Fax: 727-527-6084 ~~ o Groundwater ~ Environ mental ® Geotechnical ~ Construction Materials Testing ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~ 2 9 2006 January 15, 2003 Project No.: APGT-03-002 TO: Mr. Emerson. Atkinson 3403 Cypress Head Court PCI~ QF CLEA WA ERA Tampa, FL 34618 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Investigation, Drew Street Office Park, Drew Street and Anna Avenue, Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Atkinson: In accordance with your request and authorization of our proposal, Andreyev Engineering, Inc. has completed the geotechnical investigation related to the design of the retention pond area for. the above referenced project. This letter report summarizes the results of our field and laboratory work, and presents ourgeotechnical engineering evaluations and general design recommendations related to the design of the proposed retention pond. Project Description Based on the plans provided for our review, we understand that the proposed project consists of the design and construction of a stormwater retention pond associated with a commercial development. Our study herein addressed geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed project. Protect Approach The objective of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed project was to obtain information concerning the subsurface conditions within the proposed retention pond area, in order to make geotechnical engineering conclusions in each of the following areas: Soil stratigraphy at the boring locations and the development of the approximate soil profile within the boring locations. 2. General location and description of interfere with construction progress organics, construction debris, etc. potentially deleterious materials which may including buried or surficial existing fills, 3. identification of some critical design or construction details, including present groundwater levels and seasonal fluctuations in thn retention area. 4. Determination of the permeability rates for the shallow soils located in the proposed retention pond area. Tavares Clermont Sanford Ocala 352-742-9622 352-241-0508 407-330-7763 352-401-9522 Fax 352-742-9623 Fax 352-241-0977 Fax 407-330-7765 Fax 352-401-9523 Scope of Work In order to address the above objectives, our scope of work far this project included the following: Reviewed available published information on the sire, including the United States Department ofP.griculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soil surveydata for Pinellas County and the United States Geological Survey. (USGS) topographic maps. 2. Conducted a subsurface exploration program consisting of a two auger borings in the proposed retention pond area to evaluate the shallow soils and groundwater conditions in this area. The borings were conductFYd to a depths of 9.5 to 10 feet below land surface (bls). 3. Performed constant head permeability tests in order to determine the hydraulic conductivity of the shallow soils at the boring locations. 4. Reviewed and visually classified the recovered soils in the laboratory using the Unified Soils Classification System. Developed the general soil stratigraphy at the boring location. 5. Prepared a geotechnical engineering report which summarizes the course of our study, the field and laboratory data generated, the subsurface conditions encountered: and our geotechnical engineering evaluations for the construction of the proposed retention pond area. Existing Site Conditions The site consists of grassy open areas. The site grade slopes to a large pond to the northeast of the site. The site is bordered to the south by Drew Street and to the west by Anna Avenue. The USGS topographic surveywas reviewed for the site. The site is found on the Quadrangle map entitled "Safety Harbor, Fla.". From this review, the natural ground surface elevation for the site is approximately +45 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. Subsurface Soil Conditions Based upon a review of the "Soil Survey of Pinellas County Area, Florida", published by tF~e USDA SCS, Myakka fine sands are the dominant soil type for this site. This soil type generally consists of nearly level, poorly drained sandy soils. The water table is generally within 1 foot of the ground surface. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2L~06 i? CIN OF CLEARWA ERA • • Field Exploration Program Two auger borings (AB-1 and AB-2) were conducted to depths of 9.5 to 10 feet bls within the proposed retention pond area. The borings were approximately located in the field according to the site plan provided by the project civil engineer. The approximate boring locations are shown on Figure 1. The recovered soil samples were visually classified in the field, and representative samples were placed in jars and transported to our office for further review and confirmation of the field classification. Generalized Soil Stratigraphy The results of the subsurface exploration program including the soil stratification profiles and some pertinent exploration information such as groundwater levels is included on Figure 2. Soil stratification was based on the review of recovered soil samples and interpretation. of the field boring logs by a geotechnical engineer. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the actual transition may be gradual. The soil strata were visually classified using the Unified Soils Classification System. Minor variations in soil types not considered important to our engineering evaluations may have been abbreviated or omitted for clarity. Borings AB-1 and AB-2 encountered fine sands to slightly silty fine sands to a depths of 9.5 to 10 feet bls. The borings terminated in the fine sands. The shallow groundwater was encountered at depths of 6.75 and 8.5 feet in borings AB-2 and AB- 1, respectively. The shallow groundwater level should be expected to vary during wet seasons, heavy rainfall events and tidal activity. Based on review of the SCS soil survey, boring results, measured groundwater levels, adjacent surface water features and antecedent rainfall, the normal seasonal high groundwater table within the proposed retention pond is expected to occur at varying depths of between 5.0 and 6.5 feet below the existing ground surface depending on location. Permeability Testing As part of our investigation, we conducted open borehole constant head permeability tests in shallow piezometers installed in auger borings AB-1 and AB-2. The piezometers were installed by first drilling a hole to the desired depth using an auger with a 3-inch diameter. The piezometers were constructed of 2-inch dia. SCH 40 PVC pipe and .010-inch slotted screen. The piezometers were surcharged for a period of 5 minutes prior to testing to saturate the surrounding soils. ~ Then constant head tests were conducted which consisted of measuring the flow of water into the test hole in order to maintain a constant water level. This procedure was repeated several times to ensure consistent results. The results were then calculated and an average permeability value was derived using the formula given below (Designation E-19, Earth Manual, 1974): K = Hydraulic conductivity ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • K = Hydraulic conductivity r = Diameter of test hole h = Height of constant water level above the bottom of test hole T„ = Difference between shallow groundwater level and constant water level Q = Flow into test hole Based on the results of our permeability testing, the horizontal permeability values at the locations of borings AB-1 and AB-3 were determined and are provided with additional soil parameters in the following table: Parameters AB-~ AB-2 Effective Depth to Bottom of Aquifer 9.5 fret 10.0 feet Depth of Seasonal High Groundwater 6.5 fet 5.0 feet Depth of Seasonal Low Groundwater 10.0 Beet 8.5 feet Estimated Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 5 feet~day 7feet/day Average Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 8 feet'day 11 feet/day Estimated Porosity .31 .31 Stora e Coefficient 0.25 0.25 The normal seasonal high groundwater level, within the proposed retention pond area, is estimated to occur between 5 and 6.5 feet bls. We estimate the normal dry season groundwater level to occur between 8.5 and 10 feet bls. To simulate the field conditions as closely as possible, the average aquifer parameters, shown on the table above, estimated from the field and laboratory program, should be used to design the retention pond. Closing Andreyev Engineering has appreciated this opportunity to provide you with our engineering consulting services on this project. If we may be of further sen•-ice to you, or if you have any questions regarding the information contained herein, please do not hesitate to give us a call. Sinr,~ly, NDREYEV E f E RING, "NC. ..~~~.__ Jeffery ~E eraP.E. Senior Project Manager Florida Registration No. 57434 Attachments: Figures 1 and 2 ORIGINAL RECENED ~~~ 2 9 2606 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FIGURES ORIGINAL RECENED ~~~~ 2 9 2t~06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CI_EARWATER • o ~~Yo W vii W Q o a ~ W ~ ~~U3 z W L~ ~ L~ ~'O~~ w c~ cn O ~ O ~ ~ ~ m ~ w N ~ ~ w m N z ~ •L i ~ w o Q ~ Q~ o °o ~ I h L ~ o . ~ o r w CCU ~ a QW ~ o Z ~ ~ a ~~ U ~ po Z N a ~ a oa w vi ~ Z 0 vi Z O I ~- m ¢~ Q O J Z O D7 w c~ Q w Q C~~ ~ W a J Q ORIGINAL RECEIVEQ ~, 8~~ ~~ V 2 9 2[06 PLA CITY OF CLEARWATER • ~- w w LL Z H W 0 cJ Kh=8- 8~ 10 AB-1 AE3-2 i ~~~ I... I ~ (.... ~:~:~: ' ~ Kh=11 O ::::: O 6.75' ~ .:::. LEGEND 1O DARK BROWN/GRAY SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE SAND (SP-SM) l~2 GRAY FINE SAND (SP) 0 O DARK BROWN FINE SAND (SP) 4O TAN FINE SAND (SP) (SP) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP SYMBOL 8'S DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER, JANUARY, 2003 Kh HORIZONTAL COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY, IN FEET PER DAY Andreyev Engineering, Inc. SCALE: DATE: 07/15/03 ENGINEER:JE ~~ _J, PN: APGT-03-002 DRAWN BY: MS a~'~ ~ 9 aIANNING ...F~rpr ~1F GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION DREW STREET OFFICE PARK CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SOIL PROFILES FIGURE 2 ,. q O •-7 5-; H b 0 t~ W ti W ~ti w ~~ v I~ i `° i I P I Hd2lON 0 0 0 0 w J Q •~ i W Ca Q °~ ~+ C n- B S E ORIGINAL, RECEIVED ~; ~ ~ 2 9 Z[~06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Ia ~ 32 Detailed Map SEE MAP ON PAGE 26 I; ;RE't.-z .,~ ~soutH"o o,o o.a. u Nor .I. ,~ o. , ~"6~f -r'J ' a .~~ ~ ~ Ir.cA ti uNSEr~P .,;., J '~ F- OK } TRAM ES ST 1 u w I 1 w~1-'~I a o o y ~_~. O/NT-19 ,.. iiiN e '^tl-N raFaROwra 1 SuNSeiGROVE IQ ~''=tom=~ir{:ESalw~~..e~ !`; SNOPCEN ~oW60[kRING° A,RLUS" 2 IwIN W O.> 1QPRINCE PH UPS L" ~ 1 .:_. q.l „'. L4,. > 9i7 U la OII,~ G~ Ol. ..-. .r. ~_~:. 04NE CT AV~ ENTLET 3i w1o a ~,'a'J'j BENTLEY ST ¢ I 1131 kl SUNNYDALE RLVD,., °=j, 1 Q~.nki ~" I!: -'" I .~~~'~, ~z 5 ~ kE), ._. •_ ;Gr<oFr.io w rcloo.aita~:~a _ LNST ~ L~ Zrs a 3~=z GREENLEA DR m 'I •" r PINtLCAS ASSN FOR ° - u ff I ~' < ~ 5 13 a•rw LN ~ pb m. .w ~ - 'ZI u~1ME sr RETAAOED C/T12E NS noR Dtvo ~ w dERen~b e ~ ) uI-I°A O~')~,p t< r14'~" NIGHLANDm ~ I U~w CARLISLE ST 3'z O) I '- DR ~ uLEr I ~ NTEnnnCE nR pg:TNO LN a. O'~, ._ .41 la/1!J % .••I'; ~ yCALUMk7T $Tl .~ RT~ANIfo.LAMPBEE +ocP ^_ 0~2 - ~ mo ¢ to . C SQUARE=_m ~ o!I LNwooo Z wa ~ 11 I •'_-~-~•--g1- v LOFsHMANS ,~~1 x-a {Ir °o ~ 1 C U nR w z < ._Ir'- J N. 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ I O r I E'Pt}s.. °P ,F~,^A-.1 PLAZA I_z a I o Ian ° i ° o' ~ r><l o ( p, RoSFNMa ~?' DR w w . ~ ) ~ ~ ~-.-.N w L fL 3~'! 1 I \ SHOP- 7 o z= a ' < w 1 °tp ., ;cIRa°cE LINW006 i• ;. DRS.. r> ril~..:x1 _r st .e SEggO LV WADER _NP ~ W rl~~~l ~ b~ ~°Gf r_~-~LjN ',Rw1o ov ¢~'Q w>~u ~.S~Da2!o:j i f ..•!- ._.. KL~GAN `- <. F ~. _A LOGAN Z f GODN _y •-..WETNERI G~TOK'Y C•f Al" a .3: ~ 0i~~ -fV ISr as r OTT 5T 'w >r. a / tl a^ cC1 R CFN ul• IO, iu;`tU NI o f _W .~~~ 11 I~ ) tw. ~ .vT..: ACRD}Y N STI>-- ' L ~ ~ 1 ~ k W , w, Q ~? I ~ t ~ ~ z NuMOU o , : O /~ Eo ~ C W I 2 u3 W la•a' aiz .LNG ISHERWOO OgST I ) ~sr-y''/ xp Q o t F Q` o)-':= .r-cl ' o:: /_.1.SHEf{N'OOD s Lw~SY .+ ~. GENTRY ;`CINE~ LO m I ~ 7/ e GAP ~ ~ n+°n`• ~ z IZ ~~9H nno[ 6 ' _ .Q, !U' J O 1'.f•f. '. ISTZAROLL~S~~_~ ._. ~ w44TT p ° `ti C u; , GENTRY STa O° ~ o: \j ! S~. _ 'I°t .'Y - Ljrc^ ~i ,.. S u..f w a J I VERLE A'3`Y ST ~f l I ~".- ..,.. L2r '' rEL T^t ~o ! ~ ROYAL 3 I~ ~n ~`s'' ~ 4 CARROLL 5T ~ J f I ~ a -"" RANG 1 RD ; 1,. I' - eE ~ C~ RACQUET ~ o Io: :,`„ k1n~~I •~ff~~ w ' .: ROO OP I fl I .. . L.. _ 1,11... N'".'O S.nAnl, KONG z PARK: 5T CL EARWA TER • u:: e a CLUB = D~' WEA ERo 7, CO ERCIAL -. -°L° 590 WIOCC~AS1N I -.1 rtpE tt' SONtN°+ /ECLARKa ST -•--wEDD DR W EXECUTIVE _V E'~~i w ~•~` _ -•{Pas A f;'y ~U0 ' 'U) I 'w.' .~ _'m Z ~ A/RPARK-I ~ ' ~ I PARK w,' I ~ R A~Ki nrl 1 I c^N LEwonn sT Nn~ • I A,r LEVERN~ST o ys> a Y W ~ GRAN w6nvER nK I I N uo „_ R - „- ~ ~1t 1 p, twoo s I„~..• 80NAIR. ST rrls I TI a Y.+PgSVr-112 IbR I I ¢ z(r d o~f?' ~ f - ~.ARk I} °) r 1 iyy. ~ ~ KL } as f ~ ~~1 rp41t` lE a PALMETTO L-= C• 7 L ' -_ tN worry. FA MET?01 ST U,y ~_J -` `C z 14 . WALNI~'P~` 5~~ ., -- a ~ I:c°.....~.._I - ARLI GOON-NC~Ix DP = r - - - --i ~ ".;:. atx.R , C ICKTO i KlNG' >~ >- ~. CC ARWA ER = I I c'w'l~, G =~ G ~ ~I- - 1 p ' }'DOD ELMWOOb ST a - t ''-•,z i - a : ~ € wooo sMpuwaoD, ~ - 1 ,:: a ~~ ,• bOLF z t i ~ "rlyy ry. ?t.. ..,Igr ~t i rpR `r_ ~~'~, '_~~ L =n_p °t1 ' Lx ~ JACCEr; 2. LCARANDA r -. n di {^ARKa, ..~/'ARK g ;J!, r iYl~-~9 1 ~ i~' ( ~ bLA PENTER H ARC CIR EM 5RE5 ~P CAS4Eil., h pLy~ p tl~ ' C ,. ' ~ ~ p0~' CT'a _,' zj IR°ORT Df2< MAR O~/NT ~pARK I STI 1 5 REY I ~I t ~°~ RD ~~~1 ~1CE7f - ~G, '. Fl I,` I MAEL sr ct; + _ .. S, ~ r MARE LYR_ _ . I°1_..__ P ! C 5 ;. , ° A .O yKENNETN :'> FATHE OA ON7 ANNA V .DON ' .. >. NOGEwooo sT oi° oa>>:RI,aY RFEU 'GILBER7' _~z ST, ato f;m t. TRA!/41NG I_ a e n m a w. a a I S, ~Q G ACORNCT (OR~NATN•.' , FIELOI.. ° .. EW000 RIDCEW D FZ a ~ aY] _ RJ.CE DR ° O' r i g ti a w N < w 1 :5T • Mt KINLEY ~? ,., U "Q• "' n ~ ANGER ba ~ ELL" FOR I SITLt :'.ii,~, I'` 1 p a ; IRESTV1Ew onxw~DD °51 3 U1, r• a U ~ N! x ¢ < \/ _ z `yam _ _ ® L h:.° 3 , •i ; .` T ¢ UZ dF km A 'HARDING ~',5T Fl rrllLO. ~ OE l1 ORMAN OR E <p~RP rCCEAFWATC r , 3r' T osE5o°o ~, ' m: :o o .F; ~ ~ a.:'° .. bREWPCAZA a ', +v ---•z-, E~'occECno ST.-1 DREW °~' ( •~st~ ¢• KEWOODwO W• t (~ I - -Q J fR ~_GROVE Z 5T I I r R O I ' r~ ~y p, o '~7:_ > >.> > > >~~ )> >I>rQ>f>_Q' OC spa ~$r$rEAKwca1T~ R I w. ,-2 p LnvR r. s a a~ a~ a a• f a al a a~ a a ¢a "`33 ~- - v 1 L > - 01 >' W S . PETERSRUR o rq Q ~- v'..a. .1r~, o- CL VCLAND 1 5T '; a:>a~ I-' ai = ~ ~I a7 }Wbp J IVLT GREW SNOP CEN ml zSTJJ w - ~..Z',v1 a-..N~tF-y¢ In Inlrw .."~. hL~ I (( (=kCOLLEGf .,C. ~dRE$t-L HARVARD ST F ¢1 o: y, fA/{K zl a.0 w ¢ti > >w ~ ~c E~TJ ~) EA0007 ' ii i sr= CAKE zia r0-•f1I a ¢) ~ r'-y ot~ rr ~~~ ¢ Y;EW J a 5T ~ z 5. (' D flruouTT ~i of rAi O- F,w u o) j !° < a1 a; ~(~ CJ ~ d n o ~; PARK P(,•i CF OI r - Is _ 'S ~ uk• t^. UI U:f. ia~ U z. w F.., ~a1~p pp WHi.MANp Z•. ~r N. ST 'L~.'.. a. -STi ~aRAINBOWI In .z'vwi ~. rr ~pRl 'Z i~V!H~WIIOW pq ~ ioa 8-J~.wST u.; OFF/CF/RF7A/L o.l~~_ ~_ p^ b _, ._ t ... ._. _ -..o O; .Q. :.,ct 1 ~. - cfMBueu DFS HO RPING ~u . S ~ CHAUCER3 w1 ~ 5T l'CJa7.A aI o '. I Y~ IAp;e,, r. 1A ' I : z ~- U '' 'CORN u . [ ,[' SHELLEY¢ '> 1' . C^ B 17 = .. 15 a 'PARI! .~ ~GULFT06AY > ~e 'GU~:FtTO BAY:^:'~'~ CEA(TER ~~.. ~a~ VA1:DRr-1.}w' YST ~-' y6 ti, ~. Bl'VD GULF-TO-BAY o. ' ERS ST >~ :.iPLAL1~~ id I ~ 13 P/NELLAS of III ULF TIO BA Knt Sr ~ 'I CC EARWATER' I ER ST„ ' rugN Ry;, I"~ Qp E 1 °~~ ~ s' • - li s I ~ ; °5 & ., ~ H ~. 3 ~. o ..~ S dl. 5TH 1 I_ 'Cn1' 1 SC1vOO~RpIp 5'=I ~ )9'1 ~ rr.G G ~-. ST.L 15761 wI ~1 •~l rl I SHOP CEN ¢ RQwn DLVI1 '" wl -:_ ._ ;r MAPION PIN~ST~A I .: DMw&°~jlulalD t,1~ ~' .. 1_I N< 1' I tTR rnn N-ST Ir>I ~ Nd,VGf ii 1~ Rg (9 IWATfR ~ ST E. `3 F.,~ i RD. ^> ~~~bflulD „~' F, I I ~'r: azll~ r~..l~ y r w~ :1 CLE.4RWA rER ~J• C ~e-1Q G a "' x; CIRS ~ rT -~ ~ ~ I n I rosy Ae fl .DR~IC~mkRD Atc D. ITY ~~ STONE C~ N Q ` q 6 ~ ' AUOU90N R . O O ~ ° W LRO OONti' O I Z J DL E~3 _. TZ TT ! k ; Y ~ !•~~"L' 1^ JASMINE IVY I ,OR l(r AOCM t '1` :~O' I` ~' / Q MAGNQLIA STaNFe UI _. DR I ~ O ¢'~' '7 KSNMOREO.YI !"t ° T1 ~ S ~ ~.~: ~ Z p Sr LVD T _. ~ ~/ ~~ t - ¢PASCON ° 'I$ "If+IA iz>} ~j •. I J Sr EVILLESB G MAGNQ4IA Op L~L 1 Af(pOLI<j - LOT:IS~PATH" CT 'S'1>I. W: Fa LLr ^ ~; a ,. O 7"EKM G ppp$IAQiJ ~~OLLEGC 9 OG OrVEW D JRD~ V2~'J Imo" I pV ~.r ~ ~ I'x~ Q,~~DLEIGN S?W'•SrONE'CT .a, o7 wl ]~ I ao O „IW} 2. IVn OR Zf~F~YCT ~'° OR ~. °Q 8 al AEL%'MUL7E~? .{ ?6 ~_'Y' TI I / PEA E ' > ~ y °~ o w P1 0:, ^Gr MINNEOLA RC ~ - hARAtI~ r _ 0= k p•06~1 R YDR w' 1 1978 S ~ RC OR ` W LA7/D .. ~ JEFFORO$ _ .. - ... .' IlJ} z _ BARRY ST 2 0 ~ oW .vE!+pALL 0. ~°Iz REBECCP I Dal a"' 7 - ," 1 ~ > s ; 1 ~ > T ~ J ~ ~ osAN. pP W p -p B~ aGLEN.I'i 4 ~ aD 6 ORR ] PENINC $ED ~ { yPC ZA TUSCOLA DR U ~ ; I$L13 W N-Ash'-~`~` I J ¢A DHACEM oR L I CHEER DR ~ cLfl!+NOO RD HooR z I ~ ° g f L R cF oADpr ~~ -"® SC. ILLIN01~ 5T ~~ 2E5TEL~j 3T,.,x DFVERLy LIpr Iw1 SEVER DR w - ~I IILE1}SANT tD. " 131 81 'n-~OPC rE ~ `,N~ B 's " t[ ll~~ 3 LEESi 5 y' ST CHARLES J I<.~ -3 < HdLS yt a s JT,ec ° s N^RCO roL. 1wNINGSi Oi7A A 120 ~~ o, BRE lP T..Y~QQD H 1 ~ PNwY ~' ~;F IY' ~: =e nR b RICxSHA ok F I. .h' .. ~ a ~ a 1 RD TACT LS in ~R4~kL tHARN ~ I" '~t~. - 1 a =s Pq ~~ C VIEW' RQ- _LAKEIzTEGG~ __ r-_A LAKEVIE_„- b p.BERS1 Da~6~fs,,. ¢ °_° ~oPAGDO :~•s~Nro dR O tiLLLBR aN OOD DR C+' ' ,HANDY PARK VALENCIA)$T 2~ 3 EMERAL01 a) iK•~2 !-a j~ 29 IOLA OR CL',AIBORNE yS~•oa`~P S ~. TE6kl46f{D 'Dry> Q N"[DR W; i olo a IcoiIONETLH - ytSR `" C5 ~°~ hf RhllNGSlDfW pp rANGERNEST BALM6RAODR a ~ d'.IQ NGROVE MORNING510 ~ '~E ~ CRFAT/ON T _ wGJiACE~ i Z1< d.d.t0" >. n-N -...... pRR F 0 i • '~~ 5T, w< PINENIO.00 DRat 1b1 LYN OR ~1 O ~I Ot ~10 aUIPLOMAT pR~ cuflnso y o°a o~AR~!w ENTER IBw ~ 20 -Zr e - I V IMAP ?CI I ~ ! ><tY ']3 ; J - .. NGE_ ST ~ PARKSIDE OR g THA # ; ai ~ ! r° E''cT~lo ,~ ~ < ' ° m - TB o u` on _eLVD C RR 11~ 6 gl,'z _ ~ a wr -ENV({Y'' ~ s '-cuR Is ~ - _~-- 4RROR 5h'ORELINE 1 V [ _~ ST _ t ? S w~00R PFNNY LI~ STAjJCCL1 f f D I J S^ ICT Sn ALEMANOAO -~1 OR a <IH 0ANN5 aR ~ I I ¢` Y' ~1 u, ~TT H ! r- i ) - - I 1 ~ EXfCUTl.VE i:ENTER IPLE STS clTRlls sT Nlrcwgoo OR iz:olrr) BiJGLELN ~ to ~olu ~ ZF~>BAR~~o~D iwlLii NS• ~a~Pd GtENApNN_ -- - • ' RUST C7 LCMONST_ FPUITWL%10 OR 031 ~I "I HUNT LN z;°-liat~ W (.TT~CI'~I 'EATALINAD ~ I ~' ~ ; UMH~OIIQ pH `~~I 1 ~{, NON ST z ~,O' w1 ... - t j w w O:wf = Cr m 1_FC' -. SHOPPIN~'F j'• a Fw- - -. hq~I I Qi l~ -= HAPOY.'DOO ~mr Hl~ REDCOIT LN z4 IW i~ILLI IMPERIAIw ~ PLAZA t 'n - e" I_I - I~ RSERYZR I NiS~ $- Y nR' ° tv~.o~oi ~ i ,FOX CIR .~. ~ Q = ~> ~Q ..; g•WY Y/fSOUARE ® I ~~ ~ ~°' ,1 ~ G i~ ... W ~ .. . ~ . _.. , .. Q.~ .~. ~ am~~[ ~ RD -_~ R' ® t rluast`~'°= L ~~ _ .RD .. iSE ST s z! W AKE YfrQ ,mow EW- u osy < - - 1,~ ~; PAL R0.~3 r`'P. C`•r10~ OEN TZd V~ NC RD^ IERNEST RO 1-+Z a3jgF I >` 1DANADIApR •< <d ~ I ~~ IMP °O'p~ >D ,I~EHA7EAVV DE(:C.4/RE LC)VE~~"~`f k 1.r~+2 - Izyyya ~ ~ z o °~~ ;' SOl I !<""` °~ ° la I 1 DtuutECT F ° ~~ t• I 1~7~ELLROSE-OR °iAUI R0~ NORTHV 000 Z Z'. ~ -Ja ~+ gA I I'~~71'} Sr.r'tII:~~AdA~A-=il ~ I p--,Tr.,-- _ISNOPPING CENTER C1 SS. !k SeuTHWOOOa ~' < WIS'tF[l~ I s ,m I IN wLDwooD RO Q•w[E ° "~ of "_ „',~' V15T~{-~} AN,A..cnuz Ul~'I~i Im, °~'-O~ f •-- - f 3ECLEAIRm= _ <l RD ~, I 1BELLEAIR 1A° _'s` °yRD~ a? ~• i I ., L 1 #3 J TIMM~ONS TER ~ ~ 5 FAULDS RO C~R~_IE~ ? ~ ~ ZI '- ~ K__,. ~ $IIHHEnp^lE ® I (a ° ~ PANCREST ~ I vii 1 0~ h G1 'Fv~ W ~tt,~ ~ o cHANN1rc DRA ~-CENTER ALL! $.pAT I wa<-(['ANE A -+ LH .~ IGLENtII RDO, p O ' I EIp LC EN'S - f ~~ '.- '~~ w.~'.f_"'" 1' RaATC~'ARK I o •. I , -1 O = ~ I I EHARTEfl ~sEEK jnunron LN LANE Av ti AAA~VV+~~~t~, a S O -: ~ ea BARBARA DR ..~{ , RV~~~~y y ` A~ -oAN GIR Ci NTER }JTHRIDGE OP ~ .~+ °yA [Y f " IDRn CaL m =a < m C~ 6 sr, j 5 LANE Av Iroxe1 ~ 5 OAK PA17RK Ir I z T'j1°' =F J BEVERLY CN T s I # --`y ;_AR se. SROP CEN ~aurN DR SurrOLk ER-P ~ Ho~taCDAL~- t^ ~ OWI O~ ; z W KERSEY RD 8 $rIW CRROEEPT4 LN ~y r> FORTUNE }30R ~ LN. r~"_-'_¢I pp ..W~F ~~'P a lk O u=i m bL9:CHERV m'^PCE BM OOR ~ 1 'i. _ ~°VE~ ~~ ~^ o S OAKDAL ~ ~ -°' I ~; m3 PEN ~ ~ w om a 4 IP""DII _-W ~Q ARBOR ORi°. ..~ i U; J;._. CE ORc AP ~ t¢pR~ br.EL°" 1V t_.% COVE1 ~VRBN `-- ~t - ~ Ig ~ klr'11./k3i~" c orr ~,~ wAEUS FLic>•"`A ~ ~ Wj ¢i , cq r. I -~y~ it LEISJRE OR r .~ w- t CAY GO f ~IT/D~ I'/' M R GE pp I ~LJ p/ 1 -Ip _°WY U SON g C, m IcneEK ,., COVE ;; ..~ _ R .COUNTRY ,. ~~ - CAMBPIDGE.OR fiDVE f K 25 G of N, _. - ~~ ~cAMEO 'rN rtdR c~uruu PAL CE z I 1 '..SH ER WOOD DR zl 3L4 pR a NAINES BAYSHORE LUB ' ' z "Lwr ~ w _ LANCASTERD .•I 13 OT ~~~ 3waDa 1oR'R ,6lrgtl z0 w J` W 3 I ig'oa-- ...-- - <R'-m'i-'~- ]o .. p.S[' _ o, of _ __-•- I" ,ii'•~ c:9 : ° ce I , w -' ~ ~. ! SPAY ~ S ~; ~ N ~Q ~ "Y.°;.P.'P ~1 o &~u~~ I p> ~~ ar°~~R~G ~fi ,~iG ~ S ~ I<1~ o; i zs ~ a uL LN - HARMONY- ~ '~ Y P{L~P~~. s'-•___w. EHCE Cr a a '; ' - '"{~ u > ~ _ ~ ~ 1n I I o 'Marc wArER=<~' ~ ~ I s 1 -- ~R1AN rR. E s i o ~ 1oiE'-~ IDLE DR v t I J '~ .> `~ '. 1DE'UR"s• _ 1 JI °I .~~ ~ f'yl(~1~~ w ~> I J __ L `~ -^cewrRAt-AV o ~I al w' Id' 1$D k' .r b~~RY E ROSER m a qD U NI:TIAIv •( DR - 'L~ o: ~ I ..6Y ~s c.L r-' z ' O ~ _. ,~,~,~ :.1 }rr. M - KENT/ PL T 1 r• a V I >nss w i ii M D '""-TiD ~ P > tw. Q' }ry~p .. .._I_. sr s u < g' . ~ ~ e'1'aa 11,./.; - ~ Y1 ~ °4 d v`~ < o.o kr 1 A noSCHO E(o o FWY'AV DuENA P 1~. UPI~~ I 0"' Sr ~ ;- : 1 w ~, BA pB~L}j`RA K. Ak9+', ;. - ~,r4~E .]~ ~¢ 10• K Ij~ w~~%A ~ 6 ~ YISTA OR },' ~ ;~ - 1., 1 r~. ( " : a r'fHILI OMARKLEY•OR JJ/ y • }V1~0}'tea ¢IOTY. JC-Q RAYTI/JG ICJ- I]k0 S)-. } ~ iI .. ¢ 1510E - TF• 4,11: ~~ = w. I"'7 Z.w.~O..~ r •a~ 71AyDp EL ~E(Sft°5~t5 0 ~ '~ ~-'°' .~9T It 1: I~Ii ~.n WHISPERSOA'1 ~. ~~L.. 0. aF £ g i J .~ o' rYt~-• - 6... 11 :11 l 1 2' + a '• wD o ~~tt q~+ p(og~ - ars1K ~c ~ z z ""C 1' 'l ~ ~ o~Y"w ¢LT.OSE~V000 SIL_ `~.. ~ ROB~iT~, D' S.'^5rf ~ 10 .y~p IQIa IBIS ON ~H! f EOflq ~ _ ~ .. ~Ir~ '~+ z I ~[. W H I O• - r AI~ILfANE a R ; ~ : I W N 1V i< .k3 J _-~' ~7'S•H ~P,V 'C+f7 g ~- _3 < ~ ~ WOOb'w'-~ ="~,roP^ GRO~t PoR ~ ~ ~~ A o"tog r ,. _"~ 31 ;1__ I WHITNEV~ , Rpl f._..~ 1 R. W -J il. d .+N 1A r . ~ .._ 1 ~ ~~ ~ !n m ~ . -'.I F ` I P6E .. 18 ~C`PK1"° -~ ~ w S uT"'I I Esr 3T ~ °- '~ ] Te/t/rlES'^ N AO' 35 `M'~ °, > >i 1~ Y 2• 6 z a iR ~~ ~l"~7 9U 1 ~i i TPAo' S...AG ~Ci1RGD u1 3 Z w r a~ 30 w~ `~3e ~''2 ~ ~W ~ ~~sl~~kx~E~/•,~'4oHS`°R ~. z ps :d . ; (~ ~ II ~ ~REC~?FFATlbN11L am ~ 0 8 ~ ~1 ~Quw~._1,Ki~a 1'E~t1.-xEj 1-,~ F~~..,.~b' X11 x -sr•F-~~sT s'kEN:ABlC1TAT/ON } ;, ' l:'Y""-" eoA.fSn~Gx .L _Z yAv_r~...... ~ ~~ .5 ... M.t? .~ ~ ~.~~ ~.. 1_ 0 .,.1.._..,... .C~ ~__~.__ __-.r .~r~ wHILHErrE7J tERM. A._ ~r..rr «. ;, c, _ ra I N _ ._ .. ~ ~ ~. SEE MAP ON PAGE 36 '"•~~'~ ~ '. is::-:.: 't .T - -F'..`:.T: ..~~,"' a S^tin tTF.:n.' ~ ""aiLhC:iS^rr.~ItL'raiRMulP:4if:?TnR:,iC,i!:, ALYSTE; 7r1:P1~ .\$:S ]. r:. :: .~ .~.,_, ..,r I'. ., .z~..' :.a.ra.t1~31sc"SG.t r~'~`GTT€d:J.•`T .!~:i.-ti~i&a ~'A5A SI-~E.r fvUNiBER 11 . ~ 11 R 15 E ~ R. 16 E (Joins sheet 8) _ - ^c~r~ r , C w ,. ,~ Y _-tr _ . rr : .. ~ y Im N ,a>•I' U7 As rn ''Y~ ~r~"1,Y 4f~. rt t ~5 ~r# rMY I ~'.1N~Y ~_;" .r.~., l~{ ~~g ~ ' . ~'~ ~~ ' ~' ,i` t f4d ~ • 1•' I '~I~7, ~~hMr'~~'' vPQ ~~Y I. ,~d ~ d i r i ~ ~ 19 i ~ a ++~r .; ~'A St8 '. ~:' P 1 b I ~ ~ ' ~ ~'r,It~,'~!Idl ~t ,~ d.., - ~. td j.l Po r C '~ adj. .qfs I 19th dp .y r ~ I ~~yl'~}'+ X,,tY~ PI I'J ~f, r yr ~,. 1 , ~ h+ T'i V" i '. ~ ~.i ,,~ r~ •.~{r - ' r ,. ,' fr~r't.t~IlA~ ll. v1M ~,d.`l' " ~rt I ;,t',v"k.~ S' ~~ -A5i* r ,i tlf aryl; 11't t ~ ^51 r +Ihl,;v' { '~ n f l .. t'r t~ t ~tR. tl l~~~II, ~ 1 ,~`~,' ~' Y ~ ,~ ~~~ ' ~t5 `7,,, ~~lak .n t y`>~. r'7'y > ~. SYB 1 d +~ tti ~„~ t ~ Ik t 1 j, A~s ~ .,va fL,y .. ,. r. , ~ i I ,* A51~' I I ~ i t .~ r ,. ' t 1I(f lk: , ~.d .~i i~ ~7 Ttr d'p_ ~t~` ~~~¢tt , i A~ 3'.~ `,y~l~.y ~A4M. Ir; '} ;. ~ F}I r A~B z1 Pa i'~~~\ ~~ ~ ~ Wc•` Ad + i, f .. °, ~~~15 ~1d~5 t1 ", m~ ` ~ rt tiv ~ ~ ,~'iA3t t t ~ "r~t1'~ Y,Ad I I ti,' • t• 11 'SCC _ •I PC ~1 P <' , ~ 5 Ei ^~y)~f~~ 'S 6 '~ t a~ t t : ~I A o ~r. rr ~~ ' ~ '~ I , . Cj`a 5 - _. 'Y~rk y~~4, , .. I~. '~~45. 7^ ~ _. C¢ 11 6 ~i n ~ ~. ~Tj Po 111 i ii WW T I'M5Y - f tr ~~ r~,`_~,tr', I rte - .~,I I t~l I~In•(~1 ~ I'-n p~ o ~ i `I Iii . ~ 1 „t~'N I I. t Wq 1` I •` r ~ M. O drll ~~ rl 1 r Fe ). 't+l~SC~} I.. ') ?'•1 idd liI in t ~,Il, q~~a~i{4 r~rAd I jj ,d t,{ 4 >, ^hn r ~5r `' .~'' S +;,{~ , ^`'~y'r~,~~; ~ }i to g ~'u5V„•..,~. t,.,l„ . ~+Ir~ igGt vi~ % 1~IC. fq~~,~pt`+dhf}7~~ t `, ; l i i t t~ TI "i r d5 ~ er I ~ ~ r+ ~ ~ y 11 ~ +j ~ ~t!. ~y d i~; r~ 5 r , '~ We Ma Ma I ~~~ ~ ' V, ~;t~ r4n S 5 ~ .'}`y;: }r , 1. 5M~ i _1.-..~ l I MY f>, /'~ ~~7 ~ ~ . MLY ` t A 5 'tt,; r { )~ '~~r53~r, ~ a, +li Ali ~ . I ~ Ad - ~~ ~. ~, _.~ l a /-T- 1,. ril~~~~•" .'yt~~~y,,,~s+~-.~~n' /„''lw°' r"~fSf %J.~. -a Atl I _ i~. ~ ~ l . I n fr' l\ I~ I; f ~ . { il"-F °~~~N~' r'(1d~WG}II~ d ~ `\ ~ t ~ Mi',,d. ~ ' ~ 1 I I As L. Mee 114h d" tr. j~! t° } F I r As • ~ ~ I •~ ,u re N,A:.~ V l I T t' ~~ "~ ~~[~$~' t;aq~,~ti •~~i~ h PO ~ I .WC ~ -.' `'i I , I i' 590 u p,9 `9 ~ ' µ ~~`'~ .~5 v1~~,\,n,} 1t7t~`t '°' Or ~ [i 4 ~m ~ CC"~ST "Im fi dr "~. ~ '„~~v a~' f ~ 5 T6 '1 ~C ~t1 '), , I f p qd . 'rSh.;. 1 A • .~ fYsM. t ~ ~ 1 d~~.' a, ~ r i..' + a tc 'i~~~{, + i) ~~•` d V 'I ~~- 5~ ` ~. MY ~ i a • '" ~ L•try~+~ y 1~fi ~ ~,\ ~ y G~ tlrh I~ I ' ')v~ i, If,V .t~~ ~j ~... ? \ \~• ' i . ~ . '~, ~' ~~' ,k.~>er ~' ~ ~~J' ,I. s "'1}~ .+` " ~~ j~~~ .' ~i ~7~ ~~ p~ ~I ~~} 'r ~, ~~~ ~a SOY I'~, 'o I l+ ' : u s fs , 1 ° '' ~ 1 • tx o. i r { + 5 ; 1 (,( C ^c: i t ( ~ d I t~ 5~r ~1`ri: d, . ~s . sr ~' ~n ~ ~ I a Y~.. ;. ~ I I~h !~, ~,' MY I, Jla ~ 1~}~ `?'t c tl`F6yy~r ~ ~A,.~•~.A i I I ~ _~ If~S 7+ Ad:. 1' 8 ~s \~ T` r u~~"~ d~a"{) 5 ' ,1 ~ti; iud t¢r ~'x`t 1jiFt rll( y O i , ~ n*9~, -, i +7--'"u rY" 1E r~~r ~ ~,~1 SI ~31 C, ~ e ' I cl },k.~., I r. L~....~r O' O 1'2 fMY 41 i w"5~~i ~, a ~i. + ~ ~ .,, •:vd~...---..~~t'F~ ~-..., o o .. ~I.1 '5 ' r wfe '~ ' M~ ~o~~ y~ ~{ ..+ .I.+T. ~ t. 7 :d ~~ "~Q~Y Pn.:. r ' , Ma v "~ ~ ~ lm .~ •"` +Q,tMd I - f r..r r ~~~ ~i~l ,jl I ~ Fn `° ~17t t~" e L ,t 4 ~~ t C1` ,_ We°1r I Or ~ . '+^ o jj h ti;>; + r~. `' ~ 9r a 'e r I I, I O ! i * ~ 9 i `1t".+f,t~~+~r' ~A +~ I t ~ ~ '~ ~: ,Or ~ I~ :~~` `~ r '~ e I y S" ,r '~~t}'1V uR4t!.,, +t ~ i ~) r' , ~ h i °' ,_, t .~,A. , ~4' p'"rv r~ 1 1 Ma ~ ~ ~- J•~l.r A6` ~I, ~,.,1 r ~y, j , 17.,rS I~ai ~ ret , `c'-{.de. ~ F r¢¢ "f ~, + ifs a ~ '9i1~~i hC~Jr<'t~ t ,.,f .. tl liJc' ` n • I •, J' u ~ ~ ' Ad i5 ~}ti tJk{r;{'~P~hw' ' ~lw. `t' i~ ~~~ld~ w { Ji `:+~ r~ ..I 4•• m'`'~. t, i t '. ';~. 1LfR I "b ir4~ra ) 1 .y I ~ ~ x My ~j0 t' ~ B9D 1~ .i, , I ' a ' ~ ~ o ~ ~-In ~, Ma mi Uc. Ub ~.`• }{ pis' Illrfi'' (~,% ~ ~'1Nc. I :,j ~(' - In ~' ~.)~f'r[~~ o tia~t • ~: di ~i l h I ~r ' ~ ~ M~' ~ x~ ,'Or ( rrx f g s ~~n ~ d " ,-, 'i a`` 11 5.~. is~ Ali i, t IIAs ft i ,+.ro' {.. 1~ i~ I { 11 I "' ,.. I { ~ '~t 80AROW ~' /~,~, ,I r Ir r ~. I '4 '¢Yy 3'~ o j. '•j. *!~ a vrr~ Ub r `~ r MY{t '; ,~ I ~.. I~ ~ ~ ~~~ / MY I ,. _..ii '~~~`' ~}~ ~r •,tJS'ff'15~o r,~ v ,~.'i .7 ,'i I n } , S' 1 ~' M a ... tt t(i. ~ II. r . ~{ ., o '~;.lt+$.}~ il~ ~,~~~ r - i.tG .I: .~' , _ b 5 ~~ P~ As :w~,~.,~,~:~d+*+ ' ~~%'.riti ~~~~.~~.T { ~ o r I „ ~ , r l ; S I :~ , ~ d t e ,~ ~ f j ~4 }, ~, • ,~t.,l ., t ~. ..Ub ~Uc M_ a ~+ Uc. ~U ~ fCh" ',t j,'~,~i ~ tr. I ., -` My ~ ~..Ch ' 1 '(t I~Y~~, t N1 ~ti ~ ~.., i i., r.~ ~ {: ryMt4~~rl i,, ..~"~~ ~r ~h'~ S T 5 5. t ~ I ~'J. V 44 '€ ry,•d'rt •~~( ~~ !i t {~ Ih Ir„ As t.. -,}] { , ~x ;~ fi a J•i ~ '~..,`~.y .~ r ~ As 4~ Y ~ o • a r, rr~#~tr r ~ ~ I .Y , { ~ rl , {~~4~k' f It r 3' °o • ~ ~M I Pr a, s / ~' .;,r I,~. ), - I i { ',Q l~i I . r }t)~i ~.. JQ ~ ' R ~. 'ik~ , h, ,.4.IT . '~~ ui ~' I F•{ ~ I Ufa, y. 5~rW7 tkV, d< ~c ,' + l t~ '~I 13 ~ ~ t f ~!~'~r~ lc} 1i) .~. Ir h, ' ~j t' .:a .l IJ~D ', li Ft ~ i~' 1` ~ I ' ~l/ I i `;`, ~,~` ~ Pn ":~ .._ , Yi t I , . 3 7L ~, ~ ~ t qtt t I I ~ + ( , ,~ \ q ~ ~`T _'~i":.., ~' r.l " ~~} 'k ,._ r, .) O ~.` 1 ?i~ ,:jV r rl, 4 ~'j~r I i"t~d ,`~~~i x. 6 I ~ ":r~'`~p F6 .. ~ - ~ ,~ j r , r~ 5 1 r f ~, i I t 1 !1. u rI n .~ " I '.'j } I ~I I >~ . iup:t• rr ? ~,zli ~ pd t~t ,~~~ ^~. ~~1 1 t fYd l ., ; IJc. F A - i'1 ~- ~ l P;~ , r.OY )1 7~ I' +.t~ '- c"~~ V'` ~ 1.~- {` ~ >,". t ' ~~ h , - ~ y i W hl~`11' I _~ 5(,~f!'t d~ Y ~ ~ ~ti ~, } ` h ..,n~ty~~ r ~~ ~+ ft ~+L Iti J~ 1 r f ~ r~ r r] I I'{ ~;~ 1 ~ ~ ,"~ ~r,~"' _, ~,r,y 9N'ri'; Jrt. , '1 ,• 4 z I ~ Ire IrdM9,6'?~ 'J^ °".'"1' i . ' ~- I M, I Mfy( r , t ~ ~x~ 3 t3~ 1~ d ,. ;~ r [•' ~~.lnb Y ~l.. ~ V . t l " ~ .,j. '!"7~ -. Y. ItV i~ Il~ t ~uu•,G~~;'~; ? `~ If i ~ ~ t{~S,IS >t F tt1 . 'YY.~iti •~ ~Y~y.' /i ;gytt~;r,J•,,s )r, t, Ii i , ~k~} I I:I~. "~,~Ilb, ,. r:' h (::I ~ , ~G~ I~~' +~~ h ~f:~.'/tu ,. ~ ~ ~ L ~~ ~ ~_ (loins shoef 1 d) ~ 65 000 FEET -~ 1 ' 1 ,~ •..I ~ r 1 11 t l Ir ~~;'~d;ll~ I~ I `' ~~ _ 1 I _ i t{~4. lp y ~ I ~~ I I I .r, y. '- `II i ~:i: '`w',. \ rJU ~ I 1 i, i 4,J,~ ~ ~I i `` / ~ P 1 ~ i 1`y 1 Sit. ".'I ~~ ~ i, ~ ~ \. \. 't ,f',r~i j , ,. r-- - ! 1 ` ~ l ~ ` ftln + (,il ,,;~ ri,\,+Sf•..I~II; s,i ~I 1~ IIII ~,' I 'I I .; I ~ ~i ' ~ Is u3~1`_. Y _` _-__. ,,,mow' I ~.. It1: f d ~ I ~ : ~ 1,1 ~.. .. 1 I t ~. I I t. !~; ;;;t. , `~ fi'r` ~ ~ ~ i 1~ ~ 1``. .L; I ~1 f I Iy ,I .i ~~~ 1i'`' `t•I~; u.,~t`# etr ~j(~ 1' r'• #pR7dU it~lr.~°Cd ~FtFyw~ :..n~, ,~P'~-~~J` ,~'.kd ::., ~ jV. I('' ~~` f. r 4l I ~r1.^`Q#~f^ ~ ~•h't (~1 1f1'~y ~t rJ1 s . y 5 .~. ~_ ~..4"~1tr~yly.~. {rt'e..+ 4 ., s'~P~id~LCy bkt0.tt~F r~r,~trh r M.r„e *~ 1 j111 ~4 ~~~. ''~ ~:.. ~. .c1~ (~.! I I I 1 )~ H ~J~E. ~ r:'f .~~ ~y'1..~.. ",. 'S,^r.}~ fr dt , .f r.; a , 4\ ~ \,,, I ~ t ~h ~} 4 i ~ ~ ~r ( ` ~~~ S I Ih r ~ }t~ N \ ~ ~ l ~ ~`, ~ S ~ t/ _ ~' kf ~ ;6.J +~ r1 \ r X K 1 8if , r~rr. ,::,fyq ~ :, ,- ~ C ~ ~ _ , I ' ' s t!r '3 i St ~ -~ ~srj ~" i~ `h 6 ~ f _ xl MJ~ > >" ! .: l .,~..,6la~u~t IG YY„tjt~ J ~ t{ rf~ ru ' 1H,vl 1w 'r a«Sh 1 r +xulltia^x r f a r ~ r r l r r Z } 1 x d s~"G fwa~'R~- Jr ~+7~8A-t z,t. ' ql~ 1°'~~ , ~,,~ t.} ~;~~&~, i~dl~" a,. r,wxss~clL, ~~~wa~iPFkfA~'t'' Jj rf a Iii F r~p a .>+ ~:.k ~ r ~'> uv.vm~'a ',a~ ,~. tt~'~di cal .^~" ~\ _,_ ~>vt` . k -mq~4 ;`,~, ,~~~, ~,r ~ ~ ~`t1 'w,u -::a.r ~ f a, f- . .. f" f y~;, I ~'c((: r _ ~ ..,~ ~ . + . ~ t I l1 . t :ate a9r i j; ~ r .. "'~, 9J . \ ~ ~` ,:1 ~ \ ~ 11111 I ~. ~'. ~ ' , ~ r ,' ~ s Jr~#J. d~y~J. ~~,"fr re•~'\~\ r 3r'vz ~ 'k Li`~` y1,1;; /' ..- \ ~~/~ ' /`t` ~ (. +rl ~ !` Y ~ '',t X;.' gsae,,.. ~ 1 w. r O.yK~Na -t+. rt y~i 1 '~~ .~ A~^~F~ \ - ~~ ` 1 1- ~l~ ` ~ ~ `~ i+, tll r r.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ .M ~ ~?` ~ ~r~ ~'r •. _ _ f~ ~- ... ... r - \ MY >ti~ wk' k ~ dhr.y'~~ 1.~~ ~ ~l` } I r ~ I J ~% ~ ~ 41. 1z `~ `5 1 Ii r r -- .'4 5f 1, !~..,,.~.,,~ J r.rf6 .~f' ~ \ \` .~ l {st 1 a i%J/f~ J ! .._1 ., tl ;. `\ ` ~II! ~ r~1~1 ~ ~~ 1 It 1.~fd ~a \\t I ~~t a.~{ 'I ~- 'mo`w d~4 a'j'ty~~,J i~ I'~ t ~~~'l.!!/,~J/11! /I % x-'} f-\I .~•- '~ J.,. I }l. ~I i'd~ at~_4~~~, ~"~ +a `~ .` \- '~f it `\ ~ _rj ~iil 1/!a %/r fri ~ %J / / 1t >7: ~- ~f 1~ _.-~-'J' .l:` l..ra ,I ~•~.` ~ I 'fll i sr ~xNx `\l ,~~.r-_r •_q ~ r. ~ ..~\ ~\,,~ ~ ` ~\ ~\`\ 1~, ~. !,, / ~': ~; Lr ...,~ I I 5 j /~ ~\\f \ // r~ J - I. rl I~ r ~ (~ r ~~ ~ I~ / \\h \ ~~~ Ntt'i \ ~ 1z ~' ~" ~ '%'%~ t~l \ - J ._ l - I P %~, id:l ~ i +, 1t , i ~~ r .r t~itcl :1 ',t'ir+-y.~.~ ~ '~EV~ 't Fa '.e +~ /i ~~ ~ ;JI .l / <P ~J \ ~t1.. ., _ 1 i ~~ I I I r r r 1 ~f ~ / ~'•~ mil' .h~~` ~ ,rl'~ r r ~'A t ~ ~~ t I J r I ~~ w It ,, t ; ;~ l l ~ /~ ~ ;; , t r ~1 ~ a ,, ~~ I I :,. ~ ~~` ~ ,a ,ICI ~~ , `s,•~I )~~. ~~ ,_~. ,gar ~~,/ ,~; i ~' ~ ~ ~ , ~, .~ _ ~ ,: \nrc- ~ ~ ii .,. i~~ dl ii~l i i ~ \I<., ` ; I ,~~,{~a"`~~i~1i'3: t .` ~;~ ', `4 ~.i~`~`' °~~,.I /~4~i~ ~ ~, r; , ~ .~ I .If ,_ ~ -- J Jj /(r, ; '~ ~ ,. '.l 1` :•, ' I~ It ii r+lh J'1// '.er_ j J 1 /. / !f'\ i ` - ),}r f .. ~',;b!•> 1. la ~~Ir 111 +:i ),l //"rs \~.{'%`~{{' / ! ~ ~ f~~ '.ia~Il'r _`~ ` ( J _:F.~ f t~~,. ~~ f I f 1' ~.,~ ~ y. ~ r~?it.; 1~ ~~ ~ .. t~~;r ~ / f f~~ I 1 ~t. ..~--} I I ` + t~- ~ }{ i:.'~~ ~ I . `•,~•t,1 ! <s `uiit"+at- 1/ *s -. - ti~ \ ~Y ~~ I! a -- ! ~_.~.~JI fi ( ~1 ; t \h I z~ < }~hl ski ~ 1 ~ 1" W~ ~ i / ~ 7 ~ / ~~ r ~ ; art i ~ ~"'~ I I ~,. ~k 1 , lr 4, h.' • \\ ~ ,I ~ ~ t ~ F \ \ _ } _ li r ti } t r ~ F )r+ nr '' ~ ~ I,y1,s: ` ~ J I ' L ./fir t _ ~ ` , ~ „~... ,. ~ i I ,. _.f f'~7 ~1 ! " ~ / ~ \ ~1~•Y~...--~" i ! ~ / r ~' ' r \ _ ,~e~ ..,.,r.,:..-I-~ ~ ~ ~ tt-. 1 ~ I, j' ~ I r Il ` ''.j ~a_ 3.-f r~ r ~ 1 1 , I ~ }'~!` .,~ ~ /rta ./~ ...,+tlb rr. .r- ~ si4i".t~ddk~;: i.4, _ I~f~l Y~'f at,. --'~aisf~?~. `.- `~ I~r ~, ' ;.~~_ __.~_~ ~ '/ IC tlrl \ lr n ~ f 91 , '~ rI CC f,/ i I,:..,,,,.~m. 3`', ~ 1~' I -~'/ t'*~t '7=.~arrt `~~~~, I ~ / ~ ~''_ •~~A ~ ~ ~ r ~ ar+;:..,.n \ \ ~~~/ )'Y < '~." . r-".. ~ ~l~l ~'' ~~~+. np r - ~I ~r , ~ / a(:~ QI , t~ t ` ~ (~ ~JJ, ft~ ~ 1~,~ / ;(~ s ~ i ~ IIA: i y~ i \!r/ '-` I} ''.i ~f % .l I r.~/ s r~~ ,.~;~ I~t/ ~ ~r ~~ ~ I f. rhl,`~ }l ~~ r 1 rLLltl!:~ :' , - I i `I ~I Z. ~ ~I~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~I it ;~.,,><rf (`r. ~~, ~ ~. _ .I /~. J/' J ~~ 1`f: II f 7 t I.t ~, 1 I! ~ r rf j I r "4 ~:..I ~ 1 f _..,- ~r~ ~ \1 +.. J - __ ,\ ,1 i 1 I I(, -l1 +t i t I ~ J , / p 7, ~ 1~ ~~ ! 1 `" I l~dJ`r i' ~ Il. (I~;1,, -' ~' + I I ~ I , ,`.t`i 1 .~ .I.I I~ ~ ~ \~. rrt~ ~/I ~ ~3 .ari rs~}. ' I i r!+f~71 I. / ~ ~ `~ I \\ 11~ '~ E l` I(} 1J/ I 'P~; ~~' i, ~ r. ~I r + :J>t .. pkJ t'y. rltl ~ i .It \ ! 17' .4 i~t•,i r rr . ''d ,`~~ ~~I, 1 ~~i, `~~ ,~-,~sf ~~ a f'I~-,., ~''~ e It~..r.., ~1 I l,' -~d14 ''9~y~q« ~ byI '-.df ~~~,r.r .i.. \ ~ ~1'{;;~~~~~ }: ~• I\ ~ I t. :ate.`:.: ,' }._J~~. _ ,i,. - ~ ::~ (i~ +'t i =%'+',i ~ :..~~ r 'r. , ., ~ k lull 4 yy, ; l\ t.~ :s9, ~ rat } f ) \~l C...._~.l` 1 .-J~ ~~ d ~ ~ '~a7i ~ i .\ I }I ~ x ""`"~ ( ( ( j; r' ^ ', 111 i 1 wt ` th~~' ` Ri ~~. ~ -- 1 'I `1_ I ` ,,, , I ! 1 ~ ~~J,n;,~~~\ ~.-'~~°J~ .::? i ~ ~ .. _ ~:~ ~ ~1rti 1 ° ~r I ~,~~'', ..~- ~ ~/ -- 1 , ~~ ~--' - 1 ~ ` i : F 1 \ r r j . ~,~~, T "mod ~, ~, . ~ , % r ! ; i „' rt~ 1 \ \\\l\ r t`~kt 4t s sl' ' ~ ~ st J ~ ~ I \ J r 1 / 1.r ~ tt a 1 ~ r .~ \ yr ~ r ,, h f r r ~ N i ~ w.~ \\ ,~....:~:? ILL _ ~~'`, 7 1 Il c ~ T~~' ~ ,uk lwk - 5ft fr ~ ' (`'s_ I C,:. d7 I _i - -~•., ,.~~ \_;~ Y ' ~\ - - ,! ~ ~~'~'~ T3G'~"°~~ u 1 n jl 4. \ d+1~i yf~, ~ r. N,, 1 I - ~ t .I -...l ~ _.,% ~. ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ? at - ! t . k~ I ~ 1 I - It \\ 1~ ~~ ~ r r ~ I ~ ` ~ 1 ' - r I ! I '' ~ ~ '~ ~ _ _ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '.~ ;1 .r A,t, _. ~1. ^^. n "' '~ ~\~~tt '~ r ;~ 1', 1 ~1. I r r` 111 r . L'n ~ , . -. .. ,s r . ,; .,,N n ~. b. 3t : s ~ .. ,~t~y~,t f ~ ~ i C' . .. 0 / VIII .. (~ - \ ` I ~ -- ,:..' I .~~ y.,.~ .r ~ I ~•I ~ n t ={,kat^. ii. ~, !i ~ ~ ti ~~ ~ i I 1~ I,~`, I4. vy .. \ p \ t ~,f w I ~ 5 4 r t;-~ 4ai \ r 1J I~I _ s~{ r 1~ i' 1 la ~ (~ tit i~ ' [/p ;• lV '•'~ ,t1 I , .~. I b ... N~; r t ~ ~, ,J I ItlF i4 I +r t~wf Ip' f n " .!Fk- ..} I~~ j~~~ `i .~~ I ... , ., ., ~. ~ _ ;~ . , ~~,ti.1..m66... ~,,1,~ 6 l te~'~~}i. ,~ ~ I ro % , .. ' ._. r.. )X , . >< 4 ft' ti. `, ~ ~ ~ ,~ o ~ ,.. p - ~ ~ ~' _ q 31.Q9 J ._.- 7t()'' r'27.95 \~ lh 30.?3 ~ ~.~.~..~.~__._.....__ _... --~- i 24.61 e 28.44 r i' 24.61 e .Z q 31.75 26.41 R ~ /•~ 4J ~ ~ i 31.75 a 116• C00) ~W 30. O ~ '~ ~ •I --I ! 1 r ].8.03 C,7 LJ 75 p 6 d1 p. h ~ b.~ ~ ~..•~ db Inv 25.27 O ~ (199) ~ r2 z I E Li, I i ~ ih 27.7T ~ r 27.00 th 28.22 i ~ 24.02 er - / 16'llner g^~ ~~ 22 93 r f" r 31.53 28'l.k+er (00) 2295 ee 2 - ~ I 236• 18 uni~ Inv 9 / ~ ~ 25.93 e ~ -~ 238 30 cmp cmp~ ~ ~ i 25.a3 n r 28.76 ((~y~ th 2&02 2 - ~ ~ Q J 23.01 r Inv 3. 5 ~I -~ Y3.B~i e UO ~ Z ~ 22. 5 22. 5 w I ~ %; i ~ / ~ ~ 75(•70) o ROAD `'~ (•70) ta"c c ch~,`~o L` ~ '~ been n -ctxtc I ~~~ z9.19 a 29.<5 r (~) i 29.25 e I I ~ 11 i I ~ --------------~ .`.--_.._ ._ _ ~ If Bend-c I (~ ~ ~ ANNA I ~~ NUE .--.~._-,..°d - rk.-rug r ~~ ' ~ ~ hl 1 ._ 40 --._~ K~ a i ~/ yW o W ! 17 Q .~; I -"~ ~ ~ ; ; /~ ,~ l~OR NA LANE ~ ~// a ~ ~ ~~.~.f-/ ~ 27.63 e ~ i~ ~ 1 ~ ~. ~ _ ., ~ ~ 26.88 26. 7 ..."" ~ r'fl3A ~ 26.61 / I -cemnn! l / ~ tc 1 1d1 pnd `„~~., I `~ I 1 Q, i`I I j _.__...._._~.._ ° F ~ J i 35.53 r ti ~ i `~.~ 33.69 ne EL~`~ ! I vd. .77 sr / J~ j \ Q ~.~,~ \ 0~ 4.27 n r / \ I Z -. `7i~ ~ i ' DORA `~ to .J ~.! o~ In I C) / ~'r ' _ ~ _ >3~ STREE ~i ~ i -~ 72 r Y' ~__.___~._._1__. I CY'~ M ~ 10• m 72'rcp i ~' '_90A •n ent bops d +'/ 2-3' d I I ~ ~, tin ~ ~ I I ~ -cem!wt boo ~\ pp-Jf wh1rN r/ 2-3~ tmc --....-._~ - AF~1 I' `'Sl7 ~ \ I _ I ~ c°nt epmn TrM / rtp rop n~AMe ~~ 19~K`;O" rc 's ff'~1 .~ ~ . ~~m. ~ ~T 42 K-~,--~ p-6'x~'.g"exZ~u~TverT ~T_{.>---^~1 ~~ _~~_ ~4}~=r 11~i j I~'i~ - ~p ~ / , -- -__ .. ~QnR . S~,pia 1/11/2007 ~`i`• ~ Receipt #: 1200700000000000232 1:22:24PM ~ ~ ~p = r ~ Date: 01/11/2007 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-11062 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 730.00 Line Item Total: $730.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check ROBERT E GREGG ARCH R D 2577 In Person 730.00 Payment Total: $730.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipL~pt Page 1 of 1 Septa 11/29/2006 ~`I`• ~ Receipt #: 1200600000000012041 1:36:11PM ~ ~ ~ = r Date: 11/29/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-11062 03 Flex Std-Commercial 010-341262 475.00 Line Item Total: $475.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid • h k ec C ROBERT E GREGG ARCH R_D 2516 In Person 475.00 Payment Total: $475.00 Z W LLt CO O ~ Q N a _ O"~ ~ W DU O~ o Zp ~ z~ g~ a THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of ?. „~ .1 ~ 1. r.{ ~..; ... y~ - ,, ~. y~. a~p '~-~'A7'ER~~~, ~~....s,~r a ~ LoNC,Rnncr; PrnNNENc DEVEr.OPA9EiNT REVIEW February 21, 2007 Mr. Robert E. Gregg R.E. Gregg Architecture 630 Chesfiut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 ITS' ®F LEAR`~1~TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT . Pos-r- OhricE Box 4748, CLEARWA'fER, Ft.OREDA 33758-4748 MUNICEPAI, SBRVICr:S BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR'rr.E AVENUE, CE.F~IRWA1'EiR, FLORIDA 33756 TEa-EPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-11062 (2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street) Dear Mr. Gregg: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (O) District at 2316 Drew Street with a maximum building height of 38 feet; front (south) setbacks of 25 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a minimum off- street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew Street as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage. of palms that can be incorporated into the landscape plan from 25% to 29% at 2316 Drew Street; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet at 2346-2370 Drew Street as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the. 3.97-acre subject properly is generally located at the northeast corner of Anna Avenue and Drew Street; 2. That the property is located within the Office (O) District; 3. That the. property is located within the ResidentiaUOffice General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2- 1001.1 and 2-1004 of the Community Development Code; Frnn~ Itusc~nun, ~~l,c~cm, Jr»cn~ t~cmnn, Ccmn~cn.,tiu~:~nsitiz hlc~rr I I:~~ui:rcm~, Ccm~cu.~ut~nti:r, ]3n.c.Jcrosc~~, Ccnincu.~ut~~isr:ic C,~ca.r:n A. Prri;rsct~, Cc~c~cu.~nt>n+er. "Lc>unc. i?~~-u~i.c>vsn:N r n~i> Arrnz~~En rivi•: Ac:rum l;~~u~i ~ wr•.it~~ r February 21, 2007 • • FLD2006-11062 (2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street) ' _ Page 2 of 3 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive L° andscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, further information shall be provided on the refuse enclosure detail that specifies the materials to be utilized, and further that said materials and the enclosure as a whole are in compliance with the requirements of Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department that includes the installation of shade trees along both sides of the north stair tower; two accent trees in the open area west of the north stair tower; two staggered clusters of three palms along both sides of the patio on the west side of the building; a shade tree at the southeast corner of the building; a staggered cluster of three palms to the northwest of the 45 inch Oak tree being retained; doubling the quantity of Washingtonia Palms in the terminal landscape islands for the parking tier east of the building; replacement of the Dahoon Holly along the north side of the cross access drive aisle with a shade tree; and the addition of another Southern Live Oak along the north perimeter landscape buffer (northeast corner) so as to maintain the required spacing of 35 feet on center; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground; 4. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 5. That the screen walls are painted to match the building; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 7. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by February 20, 2008); and 9. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of a Flexible Development approval (by February 20, 2008). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. • i February 21, 2007 FLD2006-11062 (2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street) ~f Page 3 of 3 The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B of the Community Development Code by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on March 6, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via a-mail at robert.tee(ft(apmyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslDrew St 2316 -Drew Street LLC (O) - ApprovedlDrew St 2316 - Development Order 02-20-07.doc . • nblr~i-r!.I Jan. 8, 2007 City of Clearwater ~ ~~+~C~l Development Review Services Dept. ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Re: FLD2006-11062 ~~~i~~~~ , y 2340 Drew Street ~/?y~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ This letter is in response to the review comments of the DRC meeting on Jan. 4, 2007. Environmental The storm water is being collected in a pond that was constructed as part of the original Drew Park during Phase 1. The design capacity has the ability to handle the area of this applicaticn which was originally considered Phase 2. Fire There will be a new hydrant installed at the corner of Anna and Drew Street as indicated in the site drawings. The entries from the streets will be a minimum of 24' wide with a 30' turning radius. Land Resources A Tree Preservation Plan, a Clearing and Grubbing Permit will be submitted and the required tree barricades will be installed prior to the issuance of a permit. All grading adjacent to the 45" oak tree will be sensitive to the root system. Landscaping The plans have been revised taking into account the review comments. We have also placed under story trees and palms along Drew Street due to the overhead power lines. The Comprehensive Landscape Application has been submitted. Stormwater A letter has is being sent to modify the original SWFWMD permit which covered both Phase 1 and Phase 2. The storm water for the original project was designed as a surface conveyance via Swale from the west property line to the east (Phase 2 to Phase 1) then piped to the pond. We are going to be collecting via pipe to a holding pond then spilling over to the original Swale to the pond. r a 630 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 727.796.8774 727.791.6942 fax ~vr i/ ` Jan. 8, 2007 FLD2006-11062 Page 2 The survey, civil and the architectural. plans will be based on NAVD88 datum. ® ~ R/~j~ FCE/~F ~ ,r~~n~ ~NiNG ~ ~ ~p~ j ~OF . ~F~°q e~w~ ~~~ Traffic Engineering Drew Street will be indicated as CR 528. All applicable permits for relocation of the existing drive will be approved prior to issuance of the permit. All unused drives along Drew Street and Anna Ave. will be removed and the appropriate curbs, sidewalks and landscaping installed prior to C.O. being issued. There was no recoded Unity of Title for the original property. Phase 1 was Listed a Condo Association. The original approval for the entire development of the Drew Professional Park which included Phase I and Phase 2 was approved for positional two story structures. The approved plan for Phase 2 had a building placed 20' from the north property line (adjacent to the residential properties) with a length of 120' being the rear of the building facing north. We have designed the building to be two stories, placed between 55' and 80' from the north property line. The main building being 124' long (at 80') and the stairway and the elevator enclosure being 34' long (at 55') this is actually the front of the building. We will not be placing any mechanically equipment on the north side of the building. The original design for this property (Phase 2) was 5 buildings we have redesigned the development to incorporate one two story building as is acceptable under the Office zoning. We have pushed the building as far to the south as possible away from the residential property to the north. The moving of the building toward Drew Street vs. the parking lot as was originally designed will give this property a better street presence. The scale of a two story building will be in keeping with the churches and the school on the other side of Drew. We have increased the landscaping and made a feature of the existing 45" oak tree. The reduction in the landscape to pavement from 25' to 15' is atypical request which is consistent to the original developments approval which had been incorporated in Phase 1. It was also approved for the Phase 2 portion which we have redesigned. This request is a typical request in the City as redevelopment of property is limited in space and land costs have risen. The request for a landscape set back of zero to paving is a result of the sale of the Phase 2 portion of the original Drew Professional Park a separate parcel form Phase 1 which is now under a Condo Association ownership as a separate entity. This is not an issue with my client's purchase of this property rather then the Phase 1 not having their proper set back to paving as would normally be required. We have agreed to a joint application to resolve that issue at the City's request. This may avoid a potential issue with the City and the prior land owner over the dividing of this development into two separate parcels. There are cross easements in effect that cover utilities, drainage, ingress and egress. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ECE~~ D Jan. 8, 2007 J~'a q~ FLD2007-116062 '~~N ~ ,t ,~ ,?®Q' Page 3 ~~~~~t~'~'~~~,~kT~. The requirement for conditional use for a government tenant vs. any other tenant is an interesting question. Is the government more detrimental than a drug rehab clinic or a free clinic medical office to any Office zoning? Does all government use cause concern for the adjacent property owners or uses? The government uses that are going to be tenants here are already in the City of Clearwater. Is moving them here any different than any other potential office use, ie. doctor, accountant, real estate, or attorney? I think this property is zoned Office and open to tenants the fall under that category regardless of who writes the rent check. If they move out another user would move iri but the building would still be the same. The prior use of a portion of this property was a car lot within recent history. The balance of the property in question has been vacant for ever. The approved Drew Professional Park changed the zoning eliminating the Commercial use. We have taken the Phase 2 portion and proposed a single building placed adjacent to Drew Street vrith parking to the east and the north. We have connected to the Phase 1 property the allowing a cross easement access. We have incorporated a drive off of Anna as well as a drive off of Drew Street in conjunction with the existing drive into Phase 1 along Drew. We believe this will spread out the ingress and egress to the total site creating a more diverse traffic flow pattern, than was approved for the development originally. As part of the purchase of this property there was a granting of Cross-Easement between us and the Condo Association covering storm water, utilities, ingress and egress as was submitted in the original submittal. The increase of the building height above the basic 30' allows us the opportunity to design a two story building with more diverse architectural elements. The development of one bu'ild'ing vs. five buildings gives you more open area.. The increase in height would allow for higher than 10 ceilings which can add to the energy efficiency of the building. We can also incorporate a sloped roof which adds character to the exterior and the street appeal. This is in keeping with the church across the street as well as the existing buildings of Phase 1. We are not required to have generator and at this time are not designing for one. The walls in the front of the building are screen walls intended to screen the air conditioning condensers from view. Locating them in the front was a consideration to keep them away from the residential properties to the north. All signage will co~r~ply with the City Code requirements. I hope that the revisions to the drawings and our written response are sufficient to move into the permitting phase. Sincerely, Robert E. Gregg ' _ 2.15 pm Case Number: FLD2006-11062 -- 2316 DREW ST Owner(s): Drew St Llc 965 S Bayshbre Blvd Safety Harbor, F1 34695 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Robert E Gregg 630 Chestnut St ' Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-796-8774 x 331, FAX: 727-791-6942, E-MAIL: archreg@aol.com Location: 1.787 acres located at the intersection of Anna Avenue and Drew Street. Atlas Page: 281 A' Zoning District: O, Office Request: Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Office Use at 2316 Drew Street located in the Office (O) District including a front (south) setback reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); side (north) setback reduction from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement); side (east) setback reduction from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement); side (east) setback reduction from 20 feet to zero feet (to allow a cross property access easement); an increase to building height from 30 feet to 38 feet; parking spaces at 3.73 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and to modify previous conditions of approval associate with FLS2002-11080; as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, pursuant to Section 2-1004.B. Also included is a reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet; as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to Section 3-1202.G. In addition to allow an existing Office and Medical Clinic Use at 2340 Drew Street with a deviation to the side (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and to allow a cross property access easement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, pursuant to Sections 2-1004.C and F. Also included is a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 feet to zero feet, to eliminate the requirement to provide one tree per every 35 feet of buffer (4-5 trees); as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Governmental uses Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 4, 2007 -Page 27 • • Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all applicable impact and installation fees. 2. is 3-inch water main shown on plan a City or County main? 3. Water mains shall be looped to avoid dead-end service unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Community Development Code Section 3-1910) 4. Provide inside drop inside sanitary sewer manhole # 3 for new sewer service line. 5. Replace Fire Hydrant Setting detail #402, pg. 2/2 with current index. 6. Revise plans to include C.R. 528 with Drew Street. 7. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from Pinellas County for work in Drew Street (C.R. 528). 8. A separate right-of--way permit will be required for all work within the right-of--way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 9. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 10. Provide a copy of a recorded cross parking/cross access agreement with adjoining property owner. Agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to the properties involved. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of--way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . 1. Please note on SWPPP that any discharge associated with the temporary dewatering plan, via the control structure, remains on site. No offsite discharge allowed. 2. If offsite discharge is anticipated, an FDEP "Generic Permit for the Discharge of Produced Groundwater" will be required. The above conditions shall be acknowledged by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit. Fire: 1 . Driveway width not provided, must be 24' minimum. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 2 , EXIT FROM STAIRWELL ON DREW SIDE MUST BE PAVED TO A PUBLIC WAY.ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 3 , Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at al] entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB. 4 . Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building, move to drive entrance to the East on Drew. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 4, 2007 -Page 28 • Land Resources: • Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Recommend that the proposed sidewalk around the 45" oak tree be placed"On Grade". Revise prior to building permit. Landscaping: ~' Provide a written response addressing the installation of trees under or near overhead power lines along Drew Street. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.1: plant materials which are utilized to satisfy the landscaping required by this development code shall comply with a quality rating of "Florida Grade #1 ". Revise landscape notes to include the quality rating. ~! Pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.4: A minimum variety of tree species shall be provided: each species shall provide a minimum often percent of the total number of trees. Example: With a total count of new trees between 30-49 trees the minimum number of species would be four. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.C.1: For multifamily and nonresidential properties an automatic permanent irrigation system providing complete water coverage for all required and other landscaping materials shall be provided and maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition. Revise landscape notes to include the above. Provide foundation landscaping along the building facade facing Drew Street, pursuant to Section 1202.E.2: Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of--way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five-foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 401inear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. ~! A Comprehensive Landscape application is required to be filled out to consider the reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer on phase two from 12 feet to 10 feet; a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer on phase one from 5 feet to zero feet and. to eliminate the requirement to provide one tree per every 35 feet of buffer (4-5 trees); Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - P&R impact fees were paid in full on project in 2003. Stormwater: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions are to be met: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit 2) The storm system in phase 1 is proposed to dump into a grassed swale in phase 2. The Engineer is to redesign the collection swale to ensure that it does not overflow onto the single family homes along the north property line. It is recommended that the swale be hardlined or a low wall be built along the north property line to ensure the runoff drains to the existing retention pond. 3) There are some erosion problems existing in phase 1 that will be compounded by the runoff from phase 2. It is recommended that all erosion areas in phase 1 be repaired prior to construction in phase 2. 4) Survey, civil and architectural plans shall be based on NAVD88 datum. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 4, 2007 -Page 29 • • Drew St. is County Road 528 at this location -replace SR590 designation with CR 528 on plans. 2. Approved Pinellas County permits will be required for driveway access connections. The above conditions shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 1. Acknowledge: The applicant will close any unused driveway along Drew Street east of Anna Avenue by matching existing sidewalk, landscaping and curb prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 4, 2007 -Page 30 • 1 . Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.YOUR JUSTIFICATION FOR THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ALONG DREW STREET IS SUFFICIENT. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXPLAINATION FOR THE ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AS THEY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR THE BIGGEST IMPACT. 2 . Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment (The increase in building height) is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 3 . Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment (setback reductions to pavement for phase two) is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 4 . Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: 'The development or redevelopment (side setback reduction to pavement for phase one) is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 5 . Revise your response to: How will the Governmental Use will not discourage or hinder the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof? THE EXISTING PHASE TWO PROPERTY IS NOT MULTI-ZONED. IT IS ZONED OFFICE AND THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT. THE PREVIOUS USE WAS VEHICLE SALES. PHASE ONE IS ZONED OFFICE WITH OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC USES. 6 . Revise the response. Perhaps you could discuss the improvements to the site over the existing vacant lot. Maybe highlight the site access and share parking. 7 . Revise. Add the Cross-Access with phase one to your existing resonse. 8 . Clarify. How is the increase in building height in harmony with the scale, bulk, and character of ADJACENT properties? Reply to each seperately. 9 . Clarify. How are the requested setback reductions to pavement in harmony with the character of ADJACENT properties? 10 . Clarify. How is requested reduced side setback to pavement for phase one in harmony with the character of adjacent properties? 11 . Clarify. How is the increase in building height consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? 12 . Clarify. How are the requested setback reductions to pavement consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? 13 . Clarify. How is requested reduced side setback to pavement for phase one consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? 14 . Provide a tree inventory and survey. Contact Rick Albee 727-562-4741 to discuss. 15 . Provide the location of any generators proposed. A building this size with a government agency use proposed is most likely going to have a generator for back up power. 16 . Revise. Site Data Table "Building Height" is approximately 38 feet not 45 feet. The maximum building height is measure to the mid point of the primary pitched roof structure. I am guessing at the 38 feet. It would be helpful to revise one of the building elevations to include this revision as well. 17 . Revise. Site Data table "Land Use" is Residential Office General (RO/G) not CG. 18 . That all applicable County permits be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 19 . That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity; 20 . D.O. condition from.FLS2002-11080 that needs to be varied in this request. (That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the DRC and that rendered elevations be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits.) ~\~That evidence of a Unity of Title be provided prior to the issuance of any permits Revise the "required parking space" data on all site data tables to indicate "based on ITE Manual Standards" as three parking spaces per 1000 sq ft is incorrect. 23 . Clarify. is the parking lot or building to be lit? If so provide a lighting plan. 24 . Prior to proceding to the Community Development Board the remainder of the Flexible Development application fee ($730) be paid to the City of the Clearwater. 25 . Clarify. The architectural site plan shows a wall between the building and drew street. The civil site plans do not. Revise one or the other. If the wall remains, than provide a cross section with dimensions, and a wall elevation if it is not a retaining wall. 26 . Engineering: is there some requirement about parking spaces being a certain distance from an entrance? 20' or 40'. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 4, 2007 -Page 31 27 . Provide dimensions to pavement along Drew street on both sides of the south entrance. 28 . Provide at site data table for Phase One. This will confirm that Phase one can stand on its own and show that the only request is for the setback reduction to the new property line. 29 . Provide the locations of mechanical equiptment whether on the ground or roof. Screening is required for all mechanical equiptment. 30 . Provide Color building elevations with color chips calling out the manufacture numbers. Other: Notes: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 4, 2007 -Page 32 - ~" Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT - - 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., Z"d Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) .562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~o f~ ~7R:t:CyC~- Q ~~H Z FAX: ~ _t I '- - --- - - - FROM• J cN ~ Scar, e:Jr'G? - DATE: ~ Z- Z G D ~D SUBJECT: NbT/ G6 OF P~ANaE.~ GI A~16,~ p~! `Gi4S6 ie~ Fio2006. 1 !v 6 Z ~,p2ooG+ MESSAGE: //~IIfW l~' GA.~R. ~ ~ " ~ 1 b 6 ~. W 1~1V1V1DL`l~ Vi` rL-1lJi'.•7~11~Il.LVL11~lV 1II1~7 rLiVr.J • Dec. 27 2006 09:13AM YOUR LOGO .' YOUR FAX NO. :.7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE 'START TIME USAGE TIME' MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97916942 Dec. 27 09:12AM 00'44 SND 01 OK TD TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS .'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~-HHP-FAX C435-7329). ~y~~iArrr~ ~` ''.% =~~ ~? ~~~,-mayg-~ CC~~~ ~~,~i•', . 'yAax.B~,'Et~w1 Conditions Associated With FLD2006-11062 2316 DREW ST COMP INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1A John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment (The Not Met increase in building height) is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 12/21/2006 Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment (setback Not Met reductions to pavement for phase two) is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 12/21/2006 Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment (side Not Met setback reduction to pavement for phase one) is otherwise impractical. without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Comp Infill Project Criteria #4 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Clarify. Explain how the criteria is achieved in detail: Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial Not Met detriment as a result of the proposed development.YOURJUSTlFICATION FOR THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ALONG DREW STREET IS SUFFICIENT. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXPLAINATION FOR THE ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AS THEY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR THE BIGGEST IMPACT. Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 12/14/2006 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 562-4773 1. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all applicable impact and installation fees. 2. Is 3-inch water main shown on plan a City or County main? 3. Water mains shall be looped to avoid dead-end service unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Community Development Code Section 3-1910) 4. Provide inside drop inside sanitary sewer manhole # 3 for new sewer service line. 5. Replace Fire Hydrant Setting detail #402, pg. 2/2 with current index. 6. Revise plans to include C.R. 528 with Drew Street. 7. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County for work in Drew Street (C.R. 528). 8. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 9. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. 10. Retention pond shall not be located in the 10-foot drainage and utility easement. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of-way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the. applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to '1 Print Date: 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 5 Not Met CaseConditons l • i FLD2006-11062 2316 DREW ST Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Fire Condition 12/18/2006 12/18/2006 12/18/2006 Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Not Met Not Met 12/21/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.C.1: For multifamily and nonresidential properties an automatic Not Met permanent irrigation system providing complete water coverage for all required and other landscaping materials shall be provided and maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition. Revise landscape notes to include the above. 12/21/2006 Provide foundation landscaping along the building facade facing Drew Street, pursuant to Section Not Met 1202.E.2: Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five-foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. 12/21/2006 A Comprehensive Landscape application is required to be filled out to consider the reduction to Not Met the side (north) landscape buffer on phase two from 12 feet to 10 feet; a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer on phase one from 5 feet to zero feet and to eliminate the requirement to provide one tree per every 35 feet of buffer (4-5 trees); 12/21/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.6.4: A minimum variety of tree species shall be provided: each Not Met species shall provide a minimum of ten percent of the total number of trees. Example: With a total count of new trees between 30-49 trees the minimum number of species would be four. 12/21/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.6.1: plant materials which are utilized to satisfy the landscaping Not Met required by this development code shall comply with a quality rating of "Florida Grade #1". Revise landscape notes to include the quality rating. 12/21/2006 Provide a written response addressing the installation of trees under or near overhead power lines Not Met along Drew Street. Land Resource Condition 1. Please note on SWPPP that any discharge associated with the temporary dewatering plan, via Not Met the control structure, remains on site. No offsite discharge allowed. 2. If offsite discharge is anticipated, an FDEP "Generic Permit for the Discharge of Produced Groundwater" will be required. Driveway width not provided, must be 24' minimum. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB James Keller 562-4327 x3062 Not Met Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB. Show location~of fire hydrant for fire fighting use.-Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building, move to drive entrance to the East on Drew. PRIOR TO CDB Recommend that the proposed sidewalk around the 45" oak tree be placed"On Grade". Revise Not Met prior to building permit. CaseConditons Print Date: 12/21/2006 Page 2 of 5 J~ ~ • • FLD2006-11062 2316 DREW ST Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 12/15/2006 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Parks 8 Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 12/15/2006 No issues - P&R impact fees were paid in full on project in 2003. Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 12/12/2006 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions are to be met: Not Met 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit 2) The storm system in phase 1 is proposed to dump into a grassed swale in phase 2. The Engineer is to redesign the collection swale to ensure that it does not overflow onto the single family homes along the north property line. It is recommended that the swale be hardlined or a low wall be built along the north property line to ensure the runoff drains to the existing retention pond. 3) There are some erosion problems existing in phase 1 that will be compounded by the runoff from phase 2. It is recommended that all erosion areas in phase 1 be repaired prior to construction in phase 2. 4) Survey, civil and architectural plans shall be based on NAVD88 datum. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 12/13/2006 .Drew St. is County Road 528 at this location -replace SR590 designation with CR 528 on plans. Not Met 2. Approved Pinellas County permits will be required for driveway access connections. 3. Close any unused driveway along Drew Street east of Anna Avenue by matching existing sidewalk, landscaping and curb. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA ~ John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Clarify. How is the increase in building height in harmony with the scale, bulk, and character of Not Met ADJACENT properties? Reply to each seperately. 12/21 /2006 Clarify. How are the requested setback reductions to pavement in harmony with the character of Not Met ADJACENT properties? 12/21/2006 Clarify. How is requested reduced side setback to pavement for phase one in harmony with the Not Met character of adjacent properties? General Applicability Criteria #2 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Revise your response to: How will the Governmental Use will not discourage or hinder the Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 12/21/2006 Page 3 of 5 ~_ FLD2006-11062 2316 DREW ST General Applicability Criteria #2 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof? THE EXISTING PHASE TWO PROPERTY IS NOT MULTI-ZONED. IT IS ZONED OFFICE AND THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT. THE PREVIOUS USE WAS VEHICLE SALES. PHASE ONE IS ZONED OFFICE WITH OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC USES. General Applicability Criteria #3 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Revise the response. Perhaps you could discuss the improvements to the site over the existing Not Met vacant lot. Maybe highlight the site access and share parking. General Applicability Criteria #4 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Revise. Add the Cross-Access with phase one to your existing resonse. Not Met GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA : John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/21/2006 Clarify. How is the increase in building height consistent with the community character of the Not Met immediate vicinity? 12/21/2006 Clarify. How are the requested setback reductions to pavement consistent with the community Not Met character of the immediate vicinity? 12/21/2006 Clarify. How is requested reduced side setback to pavement for phase one consistent with the Not Met community character of the immediate vicinity? Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 11/30/2006 Provide a tree inventory and survey. Contact Rick Albee 727-562-4741 to discuss. Not Met 12/21/2006 Provide at site data table for Phase One. This will confirm that Phase one can stand on its own Not Met and show that the only request is for the setback reduction to the new property line. 12/21/2006 Provide dimensions to pavement along Drew street on both sides of the south entrance. Not Met 12/21/2006 Engineering: is there some requirement about parking spaces being a certain distance from an Not Met entrance? 20' or 40'. 12/21/2006 Clarify. The architectural site plan shows a wall between the building and drew street. The civil Not Met site plans do not. Revise one or the other. If the wall remains, than provide a cross section with dimensions, and a wall elevation if it is not a retaining wall. 12/21/2006 Clarify. Is the parking lot or building to be lit? If so provide a lighting plan. Not Met 12/21/2006 Revise the "required parking space" data on all site data tables to indicate "based on ITE Manual Not Met Standards" as three parking spaces per 1000 sq ft is incorrect. 12/08/2006 That evidence of a Unity of Title be provided prior to the issuance of any permits Not Met 12/08/2006 D.O. condition from FLS2002-11080 that needs to be varied in this request. (That the final design Not Met of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the DRC and that rendered elevations be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits.) 12/08/2006 That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme Not Met including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity; 12/08/2006 That all applicable County permits be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; Not Met 12/08/2006 Prior to proceding to the Community Development Board the remainder of the Flexible Not Met Print Date: 12/21/2006 CaseConditons Page 4 of 5 ~ r FLD2006-11062 2316 DREW ST Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Development application fee ($730) be paid to the City of the Clearwater. 12/21/2006 Revise. Site Data table "Land Use" is Residential Office General (RO/G) not CG. Not Met 12/21/2006 Revise. Site Data Table "Building Height" is approximately 38 feet not 45 feet. The maximum Not Met building height is measure to the mid point of the primary pitched roof structure. I am guessing at the 38 feet. It would be helpful to revise one of the building elevations to include this revision as well. 12/21/2006 Provide the locations of mechanical equiptment whether on the ground or roof. Screening is Not Met required for all mechanical equiptment. 12/21/2006 Provide the location of any generators proposed. A building this size with a government agency Not Met use proposed is most likely going to have a generator for back up power. Print Date: 12/21/2006 CaseConditons Page 5 of 5 Clearwater December 08, 2006 Robert E Gregg 630 Chestnut St Clearwater, Fl 33756 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM VIA FAX: 727-791-6942 RE: FLD2006-11062 -- 2316 DREW ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Robert E Gregg The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-11062. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. • The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on January 04, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. S chodtler@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II Letter o/ Completeness - FLD2006-11062 - 2316 DREW ST `r Clearwater December O1, 2006 Robert E Gregg 630 Chestnut St Clearwater, Fl 33756 VIA FAX: 727-791-6942 RE: FLD2006-11062 -- 2316 DREW ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Robert E Gregg The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-11062. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. The Social Security Administration office is considered a Governemental Use and will require a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application to be completed. 2. Property is Zoned Office (O) district. Not Commercial zoning. 3. Provide parcel size in acres & square footage on page 1 of FLD application. 4. Why is there a preliminary plat included with the site plans? 5. Provide a tree inventory and survey. Contact Rick Albee 727-562-4741 to discuss. 6. Provide a site plan that has dimensions. The setbacks, drive aisles, parking spaces, etc. are missing. 7. Unity of Title of phase one and two was previous approved. (if unity of title is released, it appears it will create anon-conforming setback to pavement for phase one). Can you confirm or contest the setback issue? Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by December 5, 2006 (12:00 noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. S chodtler@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II ~ TY F ~ A CI O CLEARW TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM Letter ofbzcompleteness - FLD2006-11062 - 2316 DREW ST Dec. 01 2006 05:37PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97916942 De c. 01 05:36PM 00'46 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' ~ '-'. FOR FAX ADIJANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. CDB Meeting Date: February 20, 2007 Case Number: FLD2006-11062 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owners/Applicant: 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Park Condominium Association, Inc. Agent: Robert E. Gre~~ Addresses: 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (O) District at 2316 Drew Street with a maximum building height of 38 feet; front (south) setbacks of 2'S feet (to building) and' 15 feet (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a minimum off-street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew Street as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage of palms that can be incorporated into- the landscape plan from 25% to 29% at 2316 Drew Street; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet at 2346-2370 Drew Street as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Office (O) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential /Office General (R/OG) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant and Offlce/Medical Clinic Proposed Use: Governmental Use and Office/Medical Clinic EXISTING North: Low Medium Density Residential Detached Dwellings SURROUNDING ZONING (LMDR) -City; and R-3 (County) AND USES: South: LMDR -City; and R-3 (County) Detached Dwellings East: Office (O) Offices West: Commercial (C) Vehicle Service, Major Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11.062 -Page ] • ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 3.97-acre subject property is generally located at the northeast corner of Anna Avenue and Drew Street. The subject property has a zoning designation of Office (O) and an underlying future land use designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG). _ At its meeting of December 12, 2002, the Development Review Committee (DRC) approved a Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2002-11080) fora 40,328 square foot office development to be constructed over three phases. The first phase of development included the construction of five single- story buildings (20,570 square feet) with associated off-street parking and drainage facilities on the easternmost 2.18 acres of the site and a sliver of land along the north property line of the western 1.79 acres of the site. As approved, the second and third phases were to consist of five additional single-story office buildings (17,870 square feet) with associated off-street parking and connections to the existing drainage facilities constructed as part of the first phase, and were to .be constructed on the western 1.79 acres of the site. While the first phase of the development was constructed, the second and third phases remain undeveloped as vacant land. It is noted that on November 3, 2005, the DRC approved a Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2005-09075) to convert one of the office buildings (2370 Drew Street) previously approved as part of the first phase of development of the subject property to a Medical Clinic. The interior renovations associated with this conversion have occurred and the building is presently being occupied accordingly. Development Proposal: The development proposal includes the construction of a 26,000 square foot, two-story building on the vacant 1.79 acres remaining from the original approval to accommodate a Governmental Use (Social Security Administration) along with the construction of associated off-street parking and the installation of landscaping. As discussed in greater detail below, the request includes the establishment of minimum building and pavement setbacks, a maximum building height, and a parking requirement for the proposed Governmental Use. In addition, the request includes a setback reduction for an existing drive aisle constructed as part of the first phase of development. With the construction of the first buildings, the property was platted as commercial condominiums and the land that was to comprise the second and third phases was sold off. As a result of this subdivision a property line was created along the western edge of the drive aisle adjacent to building "F" (2346 Drew Street), which in turn created a zero foot setback to pavement and rendered the provision of a required perimeter landscape buffer impossible. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.1: Pursuant to Section 2-1001.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum F.A.R. within the Residential/Office General (R/OG) Future Land Use category is 0.50. As proposed, the development will have an F.A.R. of 0.22 and therefore meets the above requirement. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.2 Pursuant to Section 2-1001.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum I.S.R. within the R/OG Future Land Use category is 0.75. As proposed, the development will have an I.S.R. of 0.69 and therefore meets the above requirement. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-1004 of the Community Development Code, within the Office (O) District there are no applicable setbacks for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. Further, Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 2 • as Governmental Uses are not a specifically permitted use within the O District, there are no setbacks that can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types for this development proposal. Without any applicable setback standards, the development proposes a front (south) setback of 25 feet to building and 15 feet to pavement; a front (west) setback of 62 feet to building and 15 feet to pavement; a side (north) setback of 55 feet to building and 10 feet to pavement; and a side (east) setback of 171 feet to building and zero feet to pavement. , The proposed setbacks are consistent with closely appreciable uses within the O District, such as offices. In fact, the setbacks proposed either meet or exceed those that would be required for typical office development through a Flexible Standard (FLS) development application with the noted exception of the side (east) setback to pavement. However, this requested reduction is to provide a cross access driveway between the two halves of the development, and outside of the driveway the side (east) setback will also meet those standards noted above. In addition to the establishment of setbacks for the proposed Governmental Use above, the request also includes a setback deviation from 20 feet to zero feet for an existing drive aisle associated with the previously established Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew Street. As noted previously, subsequent to the construction of the first buildings on the property, the eastern 2.18 acres were platted as commercial condominiums with the balance of the subject property sold off. The sale of which resulted in the creation of a property line along the western edge of the aforementioned drive aisle and azero-foot setback. The existing and proposed halves of the development will effectively act as one cohesive whole and the perimeter landscaping included with the currently proposed half of the development will provide a buffer that effectively obscures the existence of the property line so that it is visible only on paper. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with the proposed setbacks to building and pavement for both the proposed Governmental Use and the existing Office/Medical Clinic uses. Maximum Building Hei hg_t: Pursuant to Section 2-1004 of the Community Development Code, within the O District there is no applicable maximum building height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. Further, as Governmental Uses are not a specifically permitted use within the O District, there is no maximum building height that can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types for this development proposal. Without any applicable building height standards, the development proposes a building height of 38 feet to midpoint of the pitched roof. In comparison to the building height standards for closely appreciable uses within the O District, the proposed height of 38 feet is well below what could potentially be achieved (80 feet). Further, the height proposed will not be inconsistent with the established character of the area. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with the proposed building height. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Section 2-1004 of the Community .Development Code, within the O District Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall have their minimum off-street parking requirement determined by the Community Development Coordinator based upon the specific use and/or the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual standards. It is noted that Governmental Uses are not specifically permitted use within the O District; therefore no minimum off-street parking requirement can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types upon which the development proposal's off-street parking requirement can be based. However, in comparison to the off- street parking requirements for those closely appreciable uses within the zoning district, such as offices, Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 3 • which have a requirement of 3/1,000 GFA, the proposed parking ratio of 3.76/1,000 GFA (97 off-street parking spaces) is clearly satisfactory and supportable. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The development proposal includes the provision of a refuse enclosure at the northeast corner of what is presently the vacant portion of the site. The enclosure, as proposed, will measure six feet in height with concrete block walls on three sides and a double swing gate on the fourth side. It is noted, however, that the detail of the enclosure provided does not indicate the materials from which the swing gates are to be constructed. As such, it is unclear as to whether the gates will completely screen the refuse facility from view. Therefore, it has been attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, further information shall be provided on the refuse enclosure detail that specifies the materials to be utilized, and further that said materials and the enclosure as a whole are in compliance with the requirements of Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code. The mechanical equipment associated with the development is proposed to be located behind four-foot high screen walls along the south side of the proposed building, which in conjunction with landscaping and said building, will screen the mechanical equipment from view of abutting properties and public streets. It is noted and attached as a condition of approval that the screen walls are painted to match the building. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.1 of the Community Development Code, palm trees can be used to satisfy a maximum of 25% of the tree requirements. As proposed (inclusive of those revisions recommended by staff), the percentage of palm trees being incorporated into the landscape plan would be approximately 29%. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, where non-residential uses are adjacent to detached dwellings, a 12-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer with trees 35 feet on center is required. The proposed development (Governmental Use) abuts existing detached dwellings along its northern perimeter; however a buffer of only ten-feet in width has been proposed between the two uses. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, where two non-residential uses abut one another, afive-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer with trees 35 feet on center is required. The existing Office/Medical Clinic development does not provide for any buffer along its west property line between the existing drive aisle and the proposed Governmental Use. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1 of the Community Development Code, one tree shall be provided for every 150 square feet of required greenspace. As the development requires approximately 3,818 square feet of greenspace, a total of 25 trees are required; however a reduction to 19 is requested (inclusive of those revisions recommended by staff). Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 4 • Based upon the above, the applicant has requested the approval of a Comprehensive Landscape Program with the above referenced deviation to the maximum utilization of palm trees, reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers, and reduction to the interior tree requirement. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a X part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment N/A N/A proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive- than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. , 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. It is noted that as a part of the above deviations incorporated into the Comprehensive Landscape Program there are several additional shade, accent and palm trees that will need to be incorporated into the landscape plan. These additional elements shall need to be included on a revised plan to be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits and include the installation of shade trees along both sides of the north stair tower; two accent trees in the open area west of the north stair tower; two staggered clusters of three palms along both sides of the patio on the west side of the building; a shade tree at the southeast corner of the building; a staggered cluster of three palms to the northwest of the 45 inch Oak tree being retained; doubling the quantity of Washingtonia Palms in the terminal landscape islands for the parking tier east of the building; replacement of the Dahoon Holly along the north side of the cross access drive aisle with a shade tree; and the addition of another Southern Live Oak along the north perimeter landscape buffer (northeast corner) so as to maintain the required spacing of 35 feet on center. With the implementation of the above, the quantity of palms incorporated in the landscape plan will exceed the percentage set forth in the Code by approximately four percent (4%). However, the palms will be dispersed across the site and located in such a manner so as to be integral to the overall architectural theme for the building and site. The palms, while of slightly greater quantity than the maximum set forth in the Code, will not be excessive and their utilization will be consistent with the applicable criteria. The reduced width of the northern perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet will not be to the detriment of the site, nor will it negatively impact the adjacent single-family detached dwellings to the north. The buffer will, however, incorporate a substantial number of the existing shade and accent trees (Oak and Cherry Laurel) along the property line as well as introducing several additional shade and Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11.062 -Page 5 • • accent trees (Southern Live Oak and Southern Wax Myrtle) where conditions permit in order to provide for all of the required landscape materials. The deviation to reduce the western perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet on the developed portion of the subject property will have no impact on the site. As noted above, the Code requires afive-foot wide landscape buffer along each side of the common property line where non- residential properties abut - a total buffer width often feet. The landscape buffer proposed as part of the development of the vacant lots is ten feet in width and includes the provision of all required trees and shrubs; thus there is no loss of buffer between the two halves of the development. With the installation of the additional landscape materials discussed above, a total of 19 interior trees will be provided -six fewer than required by the Code. However, the landscape plan also includes the . retention of an existing 45-inch Oak tree at the center of the property that, if removed, would likely facilitate the provision of these trees. As expressed above, the Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria. Therefore, subject to the attached conditions of approval being addressed, positive findings can be made with regard to the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program. Sianag_e: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004 of the Community Development Code: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent I.S.R. 0.75 0.69 X F.A.R. 0.50 0.22 X Building Height N/A 38 feet X~ Setbacks Front: N/A South: 25 feet (to building) XZ 15 feet (to pavement) West: 62 feet (to building) XZ 15 feet (to pavement) Side: N/A North: 55 feet (to building) XZ 10 feet (to pavement) East: 171 feet (to building) XZ 0 feet (to pavement) Off-Street Governmental Uses: N/A 97 off-street parking spaces X3 Parkin 3.73/1,000 GFA ~ See above discussion with regard to Maximum Building Height. 2 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 3 See above discussion with regard to Minimum OJj-Street Parking. Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 6 C~ COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and amactive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annronriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 7 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. T'he design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of January 4, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 3.97-acre subject property is generally located at the northeast corner of Anna Avenue and Drew Street; 2. That the property is located within the Office (O) District; 3. That the property is located within the Residential/Office General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (O) District at 2316 Drew Street with a maximum building height of 38 feet; front (south) setbacks of 25 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a minimum off-street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew Street as a Comprehensive Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 8 Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage of palms that can be incorporated into the landscape plan from 25% to 29% at 2316 Drew Street; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet at 2346-2370 Drew Street as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, further information shall be provided on the refuse enclosure detail that specifies the materials to be utilized, and further that said materials and the enclosure as a whole are in compliance with the requirements of Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department that includes the installation of shade trees along both sides of the north stair tower; two accent trees in the open area west of the north stair tower; two staggered clusters of three palms along both sides of the patio on the west side of the building; a shade tree at the southeast corner of the building; a staggered cluster of three palms to the northwest of the 45 inch Oak tree being retained; doubling the quantity of Washingtonia Palms in the terminal landscape islands for the parking tier east of the building; replacement of the Dahoon Holly along the north side of the cross access drive aisle with a shade tree; and the addition of another Southern Live Oak along the north perimeter landscape buffer (northeast corner) so as to maintain the required spacing of 35 feet on center; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground; 4. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 5. That the screen walls are painted to match the building; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 7. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by February 20, 2008); and 9. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. _ ,/ Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map, Aerial Map, Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map, Existing Surrounding Uses Map, and Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: IPtanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases] Up for the next CDBIDrew St 2316 -Drew Street LLC (O) - 02-20-07(RT)IDrew St 2316 - StaJJ Report 02-20-07.doc Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-1.1062 -Page 9 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft(a~myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October.1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board -February 20, 2007 FLD2006-11062 -Page 10 ''~-• ..r'-- • 6 0 ~ a t ~.,., r R~r:: $ 'I Y . ;•WEAVER PARK OR ••; ~.•. ;::.. .•:* y ~ \/'~\ .. } ~•..~ / r~:::••'• .' • : ~~• ~~~•~ ~~~ . ., ... .::.... ... .:.::...: : : • O " .R. 000 •lPLlil!#}P •: .• ~• f'!.r ~ ~ ~•~'~ CarrbDe Ln NGTON •S•: •:d ~w,:'::~ ~J ~,. ...•:'.••..•••.•.;:: :~: ~.•..': IJ ~J ~r ~, .•: .., ~:. r::::;:::::~ .. _.. SRARKEY •?'m~•w SKr .,.~~':~ . ~. ~ a ~ 4 MGKNLEY ` :.. .:~~•UR+: fl:': ':: .: ::AbRENR :•;.'.•: •'a U ~ :' `s~ •~ ~~ ; PROJECT ~ '•` ' ¢ r• t_::~~ : : : ~• : : ; C.R. 528 pREW Si BT ' ~ '~ ~ 1. 1 ~ GlmbriEpe Gr. ----. ~. QU Y1 1Y U K = Q Z_¢ ID > >~ I <a WIIIiMAN ST a ¢L~ p1AUCER $T O ~ ~~ ~ ~ _ GUUCE0. ST CMIEWA r~ BHELLEY ST ~ a]Rl1ELL ~ ~ LL SMELLEY SR 80 GULF TO BA BLYD SR 80 . . Y S .w) • ONO culr an ~ O • .] e A. _ •~~~ SORVID:IR 5 ~ .:'i J .w RD Location Map Owners: 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Case: FLD2006-11062 Park Condominiu Association, Inc Site: 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Property 3.97 Street Size Acres Atlas 281 A Pa e: PINS: 07-29-16-76446-000-1060 07-29-16-22519-000-0001 07-29-16-22519-000-0080 07-29-16-76446-000-1080 07-29-16-22519-000-0061 07-29-16-22519-000-0091 07-29-16-76446-000-1090 07-29-16-22519-000-0062. 07-29-16-22519-000-0092 07-29-16-76446-000-1100 07-29-16-22519-000-0070 07-29-16-22519-000-0100 Aerial Map Owners: Site: Atlas 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Case: Park Condominium Association, Inc 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Property Street Size(Acre 281 A PINS: 07-29-16-76446-000-1060 0 7-29-16- 7 64 4 6-000-1080 07-29-16-76446-000-1090 07-29-16-76446-000-1100 07-29-16-22519-000-0001 0 7-29-16-22519-000-0061 0 7-29-16-22519-000-00 62 0 7-29-16-22519-000-00 70 FLD2006-11062 3.97 0 7-29-16-22519-000-0080 07-29-16-22519-000-0091 0 7-29-16-22519-000-0092 07-29-16-22519-000-0100 • • ..... . .. K•r: :: ?•• •. . L :::.: ~': 'i • ::: :' .: 407 3.. :: t.• . :;:~. . .. .: . :~.~P.~.~::;;; . .... _ •: . .... ..... ...~~... ~•:':e: . ': ': : :•:: :: : : : : e:::..• . : : :: : .:561.::'~,{:•:'•.::r::?a'•{:~:;~~::'•~~'. .. - ';~ ; 3371 :' • • ~~+a ~ : : : +sr:'::; :'': ':1'• . e:`'? ~. ~:: ;: • : ^': 2v':. ~ :: '::::': .:.; ':o`~::'•::;::';: ~ •;:':::::•:. 5++. ~:;.:::::;:•.::-: .;;::43:: 1- i : ~ • `~ .. .. .. :. .~."~~ > ° t :: ~..• I '~::'~ :~ - +:37~a: 10 1 ~ ~:: s :'~:~: 9 1 • d •:•.:218.: •: .;:;M:;.::;;_••:•;:.:.-::_. •...;•_;::;-:.:~.. :.•::: g ~'~~++ '•~%'~-ii~. ~i:~: '•'•'.~ :': 1 1 11171 :~a~ iT'i /OG 1 384 2 1 . -.>.:: 1 : :~i5~'~~::;~;~ i 1 t . A 1 B C I D E F G~ 1 1 A 11oa1 1 ~1os1 , 1os1 1091 X1101 i 1 --------- 1 ~ o f 1 1 1 1 ~ i I ~G ~ 1 °~ H ~ 1 0 ~HI n 0 1 m ~ ~ ^ PHI ° I 1 1 ~ m N ~ R m~ ~ ~ R 1 NN 1 ~ DREW ST ~ ~ m a :~a~:'::: . ~::. N :# •:a~:::" Rte :••~ : •~` Cf:::: .. . : . . ~ .W.~• `; : ' .••.•. .:::.• ' '~ ~' ~~" '. ~ • ~ :: i~7: ifa : :::~::~::;::y :: .1~.#: . 1 181 `:':`i': .::e`.::•:• 78 ~, 187 18 " ::; aa•: ~ 8 ~ jj o ::165 :' ° ° ~_ • . : ::~ .:o:,J, ~j ::; .: : 29 0 28 .•, :'::;:t4 ,•• •:g:13~::;%:~:•':::'~:.:::.:•,::::~A ~3 x : :- .f49::~:'~•: 14 149 a : ' : i ~ ' ' ` ' ` ' ' ' ~' • ~ ~ • 5 _. .•~ t : .::.:•#3 : ::~::-. j::1 tilOP~: • ':'• i:}©9`~: • •:i;•i ':: :{~ : ~ ~. '~3~3;':: ::< :• ::rii: 135 ~ 13 ... •: . 16 --- Future Land Use Map Owners: 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Case: FLD2006-110b2 Park Condominium Association, Inc Site: 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Property 3.97 Street Size Acres Atlas 281 A Pa e: PINS:. 07-29-16-76446-000-1060 07-29-16-22519-000-0001 07-29-16-22519-000-0080 07-29-16-76446-000-1080 07-29-16-22519-000-0061 07-29=16-22519-000-0091 07-29-16-76446-000-1090 07-29-16-22519-000-0062 07-29-16-22519-000-0092 07-29-16-76446-000-1100 07-29-16-22519-000-0070 07-29-16-22519-000-0100 • ~J pj y~ Jf~~j ~j. ~j (~'~ y~ ((.~y (~ . ~ ::'449- '.::' ., .M ,'^• • :. -7C>. 4:'::~: •: :•:~':::•:•::::•3~•::~::' .::...:...:. .:•:..:....- .. ..:rt.-:• ~ ;;: •. :::79:5:::••:::~~ ~.:::: • BO'2:: ::;:t:::'t'1:•:-' •7 :~:2a• ~-: ' ~:: :: ~:~:'•• 8t ~::: `~••' • , . . - . ; . . . . : : .: :~: : : :: •~: .; f ; •y ::::jai:..::; .: '~ 4QX~ ~;-i'•t ' . 6 ...;.. ~ - _ ::::~~: :] . : ' . . 8 Q 70 ••. ~j ,~-~•~ yam}. 68 .~'•::? :.! . Q ~ a ~'~ 0 E~' ' ~ ' •• ::, . ..~ ci5 ~: s::':. ~':a ~~:~ tz 1 .{ . ~ ; I ....a:::.. .. 1 9 ..; ..:... .. : •• •• : . . . ~ N ti '• ;:•:: ~::-.;::•..~.:::':-.~ :•: .;::•..~.;. :•: :':::::249 ':: • ' ;.~:y:•:': •:: •-~~' :; ' ' ': ~ ~ ; ; :• . . :- 8 1 :: : : , . '::s:~';i.; : ~ ;':: .'• (1771 PH II M ";iii :: 1 , .. •.':.. •.: .. •. D 1 1 2384 1 1 1 1 •: ~ I 1 : , 1 I A ; B C I D E F G rl i /~ (104) I (706) j 108) 1091 (110) ; --_,,,-_-_- 1 I 1 I 1 1 ~ m ~ ~ H ~ 1 o N t ~ $ ~ ~ ; R ~ R j ,°o PHI ~ ^~ PHI $ t ~ 1 N ~ N RR 8 nREw sr >~ ': ~ . 1 `r :':'4r'~:. •' .,., .,; .,, ::` :::-::: :•::: ~::~~ ::: '•: ~ :+': : ''•":: ~ ••~~:•:: ~~ ~~ ':: '~ : ~~ ~' ^ ~ ' ~ • ' ~ ~ 7 6 ~ ;: .;. :: : : .: :: ::: : •: :: ;:t2g. : :: ;:: • : :. 112 •: : •: .::. : • . .~ ~ .: :..::. $3~., ~: ~:.:~:: ..•........ .. ... 798 •. ....: ~ ~ ' ~ ::iifZO'. •i~ 181 ~:r;: '~:p''~~': ~:::,.~: ; .9~'• 78 ; 187 78 185 y'~' ::~~:+:;~:;•~~~~~ •~:~' ~ ' • :. . : ~ ' 30 Q ' . 17 (~ I .::' ~:' ':;~ :: rrk ~E'~~ :•:72(:, .:::: :: : : ~ ~ :~ ` ~'i`~r' : : : s ~ • ~ . ' O • ~? ~ ~ ~ . ~~' ~ . . . . i ; • :; • -. : : . : ; ..:rs :~:; : 18 :ta5:::: .::: : : :::~. : :• = : .... :.. • ...:•,• 28 Z :.448;::•;::: .•i49 • •• ..4;1~3::~;::::::_:::`•:':::::~:`.t4; : ;•.~27 ''::`:•:•.' •: ~:':''::':::'•. . ~ . , • ••. . .•- .9D ~ 709• ?9 -'-::;::•:•.::•;... .., E 5 to •:•':: :• :iD • :....:.:.....:...•:...... ..:. . . . ... . .. :..::-: ..::. .. . . - :: . . D . ... . .. ......::.. ..... .. . .. . . . .... . . . ----- Zoning Map Owners: 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Case: FLD2006-11062 Park Condominium Association, Inc Site: 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Property 3.97 Street Size Acres Atlas 281 A Pa e: PINS: 07=29-16-76446-000-1060 07-29-16-22519-000-0001 07-29-16-22519-000-0080 07-29-16-76446-000-1080 07-29-16-22519-000-0061 07-29-16-22519-000-0091 07-29-16-76446-000-1090 07-29-16-22519-000-0062 07-29-16-22519-000-0092 07-29-16-76446-000-1100 07-29-16-22519-000-0070 07-29-16-22519-000-0100 • r • ' ~ ~ ~ •.. .~:.. ..:•. • :.1 - :; ~' •;-' .:..... •: 1:. .l . ::; ~,:::.•: -• 407 i'.~h.3?'::r: '. ~ :~4{•:•::: ::• • . ; . • ~ ... .., . . . < ;. :r e . _ ;. 70 ~ .• a •m• ....... ~ ' ~;::::::::-.. :~:::: •.;::..:;•:::1: • -::•::::.~ :::::.::,•3Y,r. ;::.• ~ 400:: •: •• •: ' : : `.'•.~ ~:: ~::::::~ ::•::•°~: : ~::~' :::• ; . . . . . . : ;?Q6. ':~:: { . • ~.. 68 ;:? : -:ta:: Q •. ~... " ~ t2 ~ . . . ; . .:a s:•. _ - s ..... : 8 1 :.Ri.~:~~:::::::::::::~.:•.;.:-•s1s':: •:;:•::•:~'•;•::-•'::,:':::::::•~,:•::•: •.;:-~:;;'.::;;:•::::':: =:':- MFR '• : ~•~'-'-::: I (1,71 :o-$ii ' = . : • ::; :.::::. 2 •.•...•..•:::~...:...:.... PH II M 3 1 a3aa •.... ~ nFF ' • - . :: :~f6,: ::':'i: j C ; D E F G H nFF A ( V~!C (106) 1 10&) 109) t110) 1 ~~ --------- 1 i i 031 3 0 1 0 fq 1 0 N 1 j ~ ; `,~ eV ,~ ; R ~H 1 ~ ~ PHI m 1 3 R A R~ 3 3 ~ ~ 1 1 DREW ST N $ ~ c ~: -:. ... .w ~.~ fa :~ ~ ~::1.26,;::::'~.,.. ;':;....•,:.::xY4.' •~;.. - 198 W • . .. 1 ~ 181 ~ 18 Q 186 ::~i=f10,.:wy:$' ;:??.rt•;::;::.•:.:.••:••...,.:? ..:~!: .;~'~ ••.. 1 :~i::- 181 . .. .. • Q ' ' :... ...~;,;:: 27 :~:: 2 27 ;::::,. : ;::~ .•. ~:~:'•:•;:;::;::.;:Z'.::::::?T• : 2 0 ~: • :p :: ::.....:•...:-.• : - 'd: :•:re4c:•~;.:c 1sa O :.ys~:..;::::• is O a 2 •'~'~ 713 '. .: f48 ~; 1i~ .~.:;:•:u8~';:'~:: Q 148 a F ~: . ' • ~ : • { ;.•~Jd. '::: : .:: ~:109:•:::•.;:::::.: ~:~:'~:~:: :.::?04.:•;...;:: -: -~ ~-•~ ~'~:~ ~~~- ~"~f33•:;:~_ :.: .`:.:::.~::::ta 136 166 . ... •: i- • ' . ,. :.:. . .. ,,., ... .• .: .::::.:.~- •:.•::; •:.. ..:.•... .:•. ::: •:~::~•:i: •: ,.; .. • 138 Existing Use Map Owners: 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Case: FLD2006-11062 Park Condominium Association, Inc Site: 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Property 3.97 Street Size Acres Atlas 281 A Pa e: PINS: 07-29-16-76446-000-1060 07-29-16-22519-000-0001 07-29-16-22519-000-0080 07-29-16-76446-000-1080 07-29-16-22519-000-0061 07-29-16-22519-000-0091 07-29-16-715446-000-1090 07-29-16-22519-000-0062 0729-16-22519-000-0092 07-29-16-76446-000-1100 07-29-16-22519-000-0070 07-29-16-22519-000-0100 ~ A _~ °__ z _- Z Lcxtl>-ittg easUsoutheast ~ilon~ south side of Dre~~ Street 2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street FLD2006-1.1062 Pinellas -County Property Appra~r Query Page 1 of 1 Pinellas County Sub/Condo Query Sub/Condo matching "drew professional park" , records 1 through 8 of 8 [9:11 am Wednes New Search: Owner Address Parcel Number Sub or Condo/PUD Plat Book/Pa~e Sale Subdiv Condo parcel Info e Map P Ownership Name Address Typ gook/Page DREW DREW PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/000/0001 Vacant X PROFESSIONAL 130/080 PARK . - PARK CONDO COMMERCIAL ASSN INC DREW PROFP S SIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0091 2~~0 Vacant X DOSHICSUDIA 130/080 ~ COMMERCIAL DREW PAI, RAJENDRA PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0092 Z~~O Vacant X K / PAI, 130/080 PARK NANDANA R COMMERCIAL DREW 2352 PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0061 DREW Condo or X BEHLER, 130/080 PARK ST Apt PUD - SCOTT C PA COMMERCIAL F-1 DREW 2352 O'NEAL, PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0062 DREW Condo or X STEVEN E / 130/080 PARK ST Apt PUD - O'NEAL, COMMERCIAL F-2 XIAOYONG DREW 2358 PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0070 DREW Condo or X PATEL, SANDIP 130/080 PARK ST PUD IPA COMMERCIAL DREW 2346 PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0080 DREW Condo or X COURTLAND 130/080 PARK ST PUD TITLE INC COMMERCIAL DREW 2364 PROFESSIONAL 07/29/16/22519/001/0100 DREW Condo or X DREWPED LLC 130/080 PARK ST PUD COMMERCIAL New Search: Owner Address Parcel Number Sub or Condo /PUD Plat Book/Pa~e Sale Question/Comment about this pale http://www.pcpao.org/query2.php?Text 1=drew+professional+park&noapt=&ax 1=on&ax2... 1 / 17/2007 ~ r ~~ r CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February 20, 2007, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor; 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Don R. Whitehurst (Roush Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Ave.) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 2.1 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 58.83 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. [Proposed Use: Mixed Use (8 attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area).] at 635 Mandalay Ave., Mandalay Unit No. 2 Blk 84, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-09053ITDR2006-09031 2. 2340 Drew Street, LLC and Drew Professional Park Condominium Association, Inc. are requesting Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (O) District at 2316 Drew St with a maximum building height of 38 ft; front (south) setbacks of 25 ft (to building) and 15 ft (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 ft (to building) and 15 ft (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 ft (to building) and 10 ft (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement); a minimum off-street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew St as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec. 2-1004.8 of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10 ft, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage of palms that can be incorporated into the landscape plan from 25% to 29% at 2316 Drew St; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft at 2346-2370 Drew St. as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Governmental Use) at 2316. 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew St., Rolling Heights Lots C -G, part of. Lot H lying west of Drew Professional Park Phase I. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-11062 3. Poulos Family Corp, Inc., Boos-Gulf-to-Bay & Keene, LLC., D. Guy McMullen Prop. Inc. are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit retail sales and service in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to parking lot), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to parking lot), an increase in allowable building height from 25 ft to 34 ft and to permit direct access to a major arterial street as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; (2) to permit Non-Residential Off-Street Parking in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with the elimination of the required minimum 4 ft high wall landscaped on the external side to screen ~ • off-street parking spaces at the southwest corner and with outdoor lighting remaining on from dusk to dawn as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-304..G; (3) to permit a wall 8 ft high including the front setback in the (MDR) Medium Density Residential District under the provisions of Sec. 3-804.A.1; (4) to permit a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer width along a portion of the west side of the property from 12 ft to 10.4 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code; and (5) the vacation of the northerly portion of the right of way of Florida Ave.. (Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services) at 1765 and1771 Gulf To Bay Blvd 8~ 515 Florida Ave., Suburb Beautiful Blk A, Lots 4 & 6, & part of Lots 2,3, & 5, Suburb Beautiful Blk B, Lots 1,2,5 &7. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006-11061 4. Crystal Beach Capital, LLC., (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over S. Gulfview Blvd. and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Hotel of 250 rooms (153.37 rooms/acre on total site), 18 attached dwellings (11.04 units/acre on total site) and a max. of 70,000 sq ft (0.98 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel, at a ht of 150 ft (to roof deck).) at 229 8~ 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. and 230 300 and 304 Coronado Dr., Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 57 & 104 & Parts of Lots 56, 103 & 104 together with Vac 3` St, together with Vac E 35 ft of Gulfview Blvd., Lots 58 & 59 together with S'/2 Vac 3`d St & Vac E 35 Ft of Gulfview Blvd, Lots 105 & 106 & part of Lot 107 together with S'/2 of Vac 3`d St.. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007-01001 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi- judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross- examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p:m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC City Clerk NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. ~ ~ A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://cearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.ghg?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 2/8/07 BALL, DAVID E JR BALL, JEANNE K 2323 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2723 BEECHER, MARK H 121 MAPLEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3333 BOONE, JEFFERY A 227 TERRACE DR E CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2739 CAR CLEARWATER 8270 GREENSBORO DR STE 950 MC LEAN VA 22102 - 4909 CHENEY, MARTIN D CHENEY, MARIE 235 TERRACE DR E CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2739 CONNOLLY, HAROLD PO BOX 6332 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6332 COURTLAND TITLE INC 2358 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3310 CYMBALA, STANISLAW CYMBALA, LINDA 318 RUSSELL ST RIDLEY PARK PA 19078 - 3514 DE MEZA, MARGARET M 195 BAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3304 F 006-11062; 122 ARFIELD, WAYNE BARFIELD, CHERYL A 310 ANNA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2705 EACH, PATRICK W BEACH, KATHLEEN A 406 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2713 BELLA VITA CONDO ASSN BISTARKEY, STEVE J 198 FERNWOOD AVE BISTARKEY, ILA M CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 108 MAPLEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3332 BRIDGES, JULIAN K CANTRELL, MARILYN M THE 148 BAYWOOD AVE 874 LAKE FOREST RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2233 CARBONARA, SEBASTIANO CHAVIS, TRAVIS CARBONARA, CELESTE CHAVIS, NICOLE 4048 N MARMORA 2357 DORA DR CHICAGO IL 60634 - 1727 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 CLARKE, HARRISON T CLARKE, CAROLYN M 2310 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2722 CONN, W TAYLOR CONN, BONNIE M 300 ANNA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2705 CONSTANTINE, GUS M CONSTANTINE, JOYCE R 150 N FERNWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3326 CRITES, FLORENCE E CRITES, T JAMES 210 ANNA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2703 DADDIO, THOMAS A SR DADDIO, LORIE 186 FERNWOOD AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3326 DEL PING, LEANDRO J DEL PINO, VIVIAN A 10 LEMON RD FARMINGDALE NJ 07727 - 3534 COUCH, KATHRYN W 164 BAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3303 CURTS, KRISTEN E 2371 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 DAVIES, WILKINS L 2343 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3309 DENNISON, VICTOR L DENNISON, LYNNE M 2347 LORENA LN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2727 DIDDENS, CHARLES DIEKHOFF, DWAYNE DLUHY, JOSEPH J THE DIDDENS, RUTH FITZPATRICK, TRACY TRUST NO 198 13317 TIMOTHY LN 113 MAYWOOD AVE N P O BOX 643 MOKLENA tL 60448 - 9579 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3337 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 0643 M DOMBROSKY, JOSEPH E DOMBROSKY, LYNNE A 2317 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2723 DREW OFFICE PARK CONDO 2380 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3311 ERNSBERGER,CATHERYN M 2335 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765'- 2720 FAB HOMES FLORIDA INC PO BOX 261173 TAMPA FL 33685 - 1173 FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF CLEA FLOYD, ERIC D 2299 DREW ST BARBER, BRIDGET D CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3323 117 MAYWOOD AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3337 GJM 620 BYPASS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5024 GOBAR, RALPH K GOBAR, SU-MEI 9287 SEWALL AVE LAUREL MD 20723 - 1848 GUY, ALBERT L GUY, LINDA M 1689 OAK PL CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1351 HAMPTON, DAVID III 185 FERNWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - HERVEY, DAVID R HERVEY,SUZANNE 306 ANNA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2705 HUNTER, CHRISTOPHER L JENSEN, MICHAEL L 124 MAPLEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3332 JEFFREY, JACK K JEFFREY, NORA A 116 MAPLEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3332 HACKBARTH, THOMAS E HACKBARTH, MAUREEN R 2359 LORENA LN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2727 HATCH, ELIZABETH J HATCH, HEDLEY JR 112 MAPLEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3332 HOWARD, WILLIAM B HOWARD, VICKI J 2353 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 J E S PROP INC 3281 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1909 JENSEN, MICHAEL HUNTER, CHRISTOPHER L 124 MAPLEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3332 DREW PROFESSIONAL PARK CONDO A 3281 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1909 FAITH UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST 2401 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2816 FOWLER, ROBERT E 2393 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 GOKCEN, CENGIZ PO BOX 4058 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4058 HALL, TRACY 2312 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2719 HERMANN, DALE 18213 VAN NESS AVE TORRANCE CA 90504 - HUNT, SAMUEL S HUNT, JANET M 2353 LORENA LN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2727 JACKSON, DOROTHY S JACKSON, KENNETH R 116 N MAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3336 JES PROPERTIES INC 3281 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1909 KELLY, KEVIN C KING, CAROLYN R B KING, PAMELA A KELLY, SALLY M WILLIS, PATRICIA L 108 N MAYWOOD AVE 2350 ELLA PL 165 BAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3336 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2722 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3304 KLINE, JUSTIN KNOWLES, DAROLD D LA MONTE, ROBERT G JR 221 TERRACE DR E GODETTE KNOWLES, LYNNE 241 TERRACE DR E CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2739 2322 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2739 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2719 LACERT, DONALD C LINTHICUM, RICHARD C JR LYNN, TRACY L 2311 DORA DR 1201 DR ML KING JR ST NE #4001 2346 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2722 MADDEN, MATTHEW MANTZ, JEANANN MARJIR PROPERTIES L L C CRITCHLEY, JOE 113 MAPLEWOOD AVE 2380 DREW ST 711 PINELLAS ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 -3333 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3311 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3426 MARSHALL, SCOTT MATHEWS, HEYWARD H MASON KELLI P MARSHALL,'KATHARINA MATHEWS, CAROL R 125 MAPLEWOOD AVE 11503 MERIDIAN POINT DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3333 109 MAPLEWOOD AVE TAMPA FL 33626 - 3334 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3333 MAY, DAVID S MC MASTER, PAUL MURRAY, CHARLES R 135 BAYWOOD AVE MC MASTER, DEBRA MURRAY, JUDITH A , CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3304 PO BOX 5771 2346 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5771 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2719 NATANSKI, BRENDA L NEWKIRK, JAMES D NGUYEN, LEANNE T NATANSKI, MICHAEL NGUYEN, DIEN T 2323 DORA DR 407 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 181 PINEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2714 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3341 NUSSEAR, ROBERT E ORMOND, ROBERT W PARKER, IRENE M THE 1446 WOODSTREAM DR ORMOND, CATHERINE M 1606 W CHARLES OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 4832 109 N MAYWOOD AVE CHAMPAIGN IL 61821 - 4424 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3337 PASSIAS, ARTHUR PATE, GEORGE W JR PATEL, SANDIP I PA PASSIAS, IRENE 2376 DORA DR 1950 PETERS PL 112 N MAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2721 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7597 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3336 PATRICK, PAUL E PERRET„ RONALD PINELLAS COUNTY 120 N MAYWOOD AVE 132 BAYWOOD AVE 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3336 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 RADCLIFFE, TROY A RATLIFF, JAMES B ROBINSON, TODD E BOISSE, DAVID L RATLIFF, LORRAINE A 2330 DORA DR 117 MAPLEWOOD AVE 7 MAYWOOD AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2719 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3333 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3335 ROGERS, JEFFREY R BERSTEIN, DEANNA C 2386 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2721 SKMINC 611 DRUID RD E STE 403 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935 SHAW, JOHN C 121 MAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 STRICKLAND, BRIAN STRICKLAND, MELISSA 149 PINEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3341 SYMES, GERALD SYMES, HILDA D 133 PINEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3341 TINNY, DONALD F TINNY, GERALDINE M 2652 CONCORDE CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2715 TUNDIDOR, ALFONSO TUNDIDOR, ADALGISA 1709 LONG ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3634 VO, AN H VAN PHAN, CUU THI 162 FERNWOOD AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3326 WILLIAMS, LARRY L WILLIAMS, KATHY L 165 PINEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3341 M ROSE, CARIDA V 2338 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2722 SCRIPTER, ROBERT L SCRIPTER, MARY A 2335 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 -2723 SINGH, CHUNILALL SINGH, YVONNE 149 BAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3304 SUOMINEN, JAN V SUOMINEN, SUE A 2341 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 THETA ASSOC INC 18125 GREENFIELD RD CLINTON TOWNSHIP MI 48038 - 6820 TRIZIS, GUS 2365 LORENA LN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2727 TURNER, ANN E 2347 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 WEBER, VINCENT M WEBER, SHELLEY 2360 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2719 WINDSETH, SUSAN J WINDSETH, ERIC H 2365 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2720 YOUNG, RONALD L CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS YOUNG, MARY N COALITION 2316 DORA DR JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2719 P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 ROSS, KATHI 2341 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2723 SHARROW, FRANCIS B SHARROW, ELEANOR J 216 ANNA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2703 STEG, JOSEPH M 148 PINEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3340 SVENSON, GREGORY N 2340 ELLA PL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2722 TILLEY, MARIA M 181 BAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3304 TUCKER, MARVIN R TUCKER, NEVA J 2370 DORA DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2721 VALTORTA, ENRICO E VALTORTA, LUCILLE N PO BOX 207 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0207 WHITTLETON, RICHARD E WHITTLETON, JOANNE 2351 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3309 WISE, PATRICIAA 180 BAYWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3303 . _.. _ '- ~Ear~rir~c~ ueFa~rnent '100 Soufh P~Iyrtte Avenue CEearv~ater~ F{oriCa 33756 Tcic~i'iviic: 7L7v v~--Ar.=i v7 Fax: 7~75fi2~sE5 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and aoplicafion are required to be coI(ated, sfaoled, and folded info sets ^ SUBN{tTAPPLICATION FEE$ ORIGINAL fS++RnnECiiENED 7 ~l~lN 1 ~ 2oQ8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INF~~OrrRfVE.4TlOR REVUE RED (APPLICATIO7NS, P~LU~STSITE PLAN SETS} (devised 03/28/2006} ~ !1t'f[ [/tel. p[T l~.R~ APPLICANT RIAfJIE: MAIL[NG ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PP.OPEP.TY Ot~IER(S): List ALL owners on the deed /"'fit [ R An [T plea ,~ vFPeii~~rc E-eieis ~e=Eiv t ievrf.si;ivis~Tie:siv. ~i.G~e S~::E`.i~r~[ 1-~2irc.e=t} `-~ ~,2~,¢y Sfi~L.- '1 LG c~r _~~Gd1~00~ ~+ ~~ ~~ 1 M~ CELL NUt~ABER: 'J AGENT NACJIE: ~.~ ~ . MAILING ADDRESS: ~~ ~~,~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ PHONE NUMBER: '*"~:7(:/~ ~~' ~ i ' ~-~~, ~r~~ FAX NUMBER: ~^?/.i 1 .- CELL NUMBER: (,-eL f~~ L~ ~~t~ E-MAILADDRESS: --~ ~=~,-l- B. F'R©POSED i3Et~'ELO~PMENT ENF®E2MAT!(?E~: ((Co/cSe Section 4 2E22.A) PROJECT NAME: ,~ V V r~g~ : ~~ pROJECT VALUATION: ~T STRFETADDRESS , Z~JZl,~ ~ PARCEL NUMBER(S): L~~ °~.,~~ ~~~ PARCEL SIZE (acres): '~ ~~ ~"~ ~Ga?a~-S PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ,GbG~ ,~,trta, .,rer~ ~ ~ ~nin n ~~.~-~ e ,~~...~n ~ e PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (irrlude number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ~IT1~ ~I- $ ~~tJt~, OCR u~vLr~-t t r~ ~ ~ ~ - ~. ru cnn ~- ~ , `7 ~; ~ppC } I ~ I ~~~~~` 1~~ Pale 1 of7 d~ ~~ C.~SE ~: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): -DATE RECEIVED: +- -- - o ~~ ~~ -- FEanning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater; F16rida 33756 ~, ~~,,:~~.~`~~"`-~"'..~~``-~ Telephone: 727562-4567 ~""'~ ~'~` `"`` ``°"' ,"E '.,`_°"`~ Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMRAPPLICATION FEE$ ORIGINAL RECENED Jr~~ 11 ZOQ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ~~~~~I,E ~~~~I1~P1V~1~ i r~~P~,~C~'~'~~loT Comprehe,~cve ~nfiil Redevelorment ~ro;ect (Revised. 04/28/2006) ~T'~~~SE ~'~'~ ~R PTA A. APPLICANT, PROPE€2TY OWNER AND AGENT INF012MATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ,1 `` 66 `` pp~~q ~ .~y~ , } e '~y^ ~ e ~~ A MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: -~~-'~ - CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(Sj: -~-~~°~-~- ~/ ~ ~~ ~ _~ C.9T" t ~ ~4'~""' List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: E MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSE© DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: ~~~® ~~~ ~i PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS ' PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): Q PARCEL SIZE (square.feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: - I PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: ~. $pec~cally identify the requesE (include number of units or square footage of non{esidential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 8 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: --- ~a~61~~ ~) ~ ~ll~~ EF'~Ci. PLANNING DEPARTi~fI:N~' CITY OF CLEP,RY'JATEl7 RECEIVED G~TX QE a~/ F DOES THIS A?PLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPfv1ENT RIGHTS (fDR), A PREVIOUSLY~~~OV~~?~NtdED UNIT DEVELOPtJiENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY /~PPROVED_(CERTIFIED) SITE ?LAN? YES _ NO _-(#~es; atfash-a-copy-ort'~e-applicable-documents) C. PROOF OF 01~~fNERS!-itP: (Comae Section 4-2Q2.A.5) SUoMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED `fOTHE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. trefRfTTEN SUBidiITTAL RED-yCf(F2EfJiEfITS: (Cade Section 3-9'83.0 Provide compiete responses to the six (6) GENEP,AL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain ho~v each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed deve{opment of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in v/hich it is located. "t`t n ,~-. r°^ ~ (~ ~ 2.~ n a . ~ p , It t~ i t ft .~! Ifs I~, ~ {' ~~/ _ t=L4 4.~'.P~i fif:_~'^.?6-ft _L_ ~t k,.,?i~ ',"sue C^`~~^„wz- ~~ If `fy 1~.~~C~ E(,~~.~.~_ F,f't_~ r ~/"~ ~/v p '- _~~~1 , ..,~Mt~_•~~,~ ~~'{~ t~~~:a~ °~~t~ s~~~°`~ ~ I'(,c~_ ~~~~1.! ~~-~i~~~L~~rr' ~` -- - `- -I°r-r,~=~_ E t y t ~.• ~ G..__.. - - e ~e 5 l`~ ° i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L . . .~l ".. lJr f\l.~~f -j-~~ ~ v `~f ~- t,~,y ~i ~:. i i~'1 ~~~.1,~'`, f.,a~ ~-v ~ -~tr T `re ;~rapasGd deveia rYSer~i witi iot ~ ifrraer ar ais aura e th i t d i t . 5e p c g e apprcor a e eve op!v?an and use o >dacer:t land and bui!dinas or si^nircantly ^~parr ,~,e value thereof. - pk ' L ., C , ~~~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ Q~_G~M~~F ~ 1-~_ i/ ~' ~ ,_ 4~`~_V'f l"'y k ~ t~..~_._~v~l,.X~AFttt ~~''!1 ~~•.~)--'-zci'~`~`r, IJ _ ~.t_ 1, l l! ~e"~ ~~ ti: k i . _.-. .,_. ~- T na r;aDO?d devet0 i'?e:It l.fll .~Jt a"_. a..~y ~;r._..4 ci"!-~ thettF: ar S~~., c ., , +, -. ' ~ p ~ .y Or ,,....,a.s cSlGiny v 4 { my in i.°le i e- nDO^^vOu Of irle prOpOSe,^.~ USe. __~-Y-+-~ _~='°-='-_l/~~/ _I,7 !.,1~a+~~~~~`~-'~'l-S.-_ t:.;~GtiJ,~Y-, ft{~~~ ~r~~~; t ~ :L1LIl t~y_ ' ~ ~`~f ~ --- - , r ~ -~Y~~- 4. The proposed developmen rs designed o mmrm~_ tra ongesuon. --`~ ~ ~ : '~ - J 5. Tie proposed de+v~elopmefn. t is conspryisten5t v~.~ith the communPiry character ofthe i{nm~gma fdi(afe v~~i~c'i~n~nity of the parcelAproposed for development. rR F'';~/F e! ~XU }f jn ~ ; ~ t(,'M /I D ~~ ` L 1~,~` ~ f~-r~~`~ F..~Ff\ ~. lit ra*' ~~ ~A ~~f ~3.. q~ r r - . y r ~~11 6A~ ` ~ k,.~ ,5p~~ ~ Pt EE y11t J~ 1.~. __~. F1 F e ~~ ~ ~~, i~l.r ~ .f~~er~.."F 1~~~ [I ~14~7 "~C4 F1 p ~ 4 `mod ~ P~~__. - - •~t < p _r rte. !~~, . 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation imaacts, " on ady scent properies. ' f ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ ` ~ ~ :1: ~~ J.. ~~a; 1~_ ~'~~fi'I(1~ C.~1!;~t ~L- t!.t,~. .~-1/~"-:~~` . P ,lti~ c/ / [ ~~i ~ V t ~1 ~~ ~ ~/ ~RI~IIilA6~ RECEIVED Pae~ 2 oil ~ C ~ L16~6~ ~~Nt~lt~~ DEpARTUlEf~°~ ~l1~ C31= ~I.CAR~AIR~'ER • WR[TTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Comprehensive Infiil Redevelopment Project Criteria) Q Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHIENSIVE INFlLL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is-achieved,-in-detail: -- --- - -- -- --- 1 _ The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district 'TAI a p~Jlf~ttyC,~ I~ NCB -.: A ~~~~.I~GZ> '~'~~~7'": U:1I~~C~6-~i `(;fA 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district '~15 ?~`~° I~ ~ov~~ ~'~, ~~ Wa-t~Gt-k IS U~{°~~'" ~~ [~Jh2 ~rJ-~r I ~ , ~ s t ~ I ~ co~i c~[~2f-~!~ fa-~ r~C. ~ r` , fu iC1a 4'ca -~,t tom. ~- 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the nonnal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. ~Ca~~ 'i '-PFD O~ c'~t~ 1 Cam t A Sv lA! ! 1...~ .~ ~r~-' l t~1~ GDYr~ ~~i' ~-3L ~ 1 u l ~ ~ ©'~C t"1 ~ 2 C~t°~t t ~ /~N D 17~ '~11t~'fiLc90~'~~ 1~~ ~~ ~ 4. Adjoining properties will not su~~er substantial detriment as a result ofttse proposed development. Yvt G ~ i ~ f T1,l.Tl ~>~~ ~ (~ l ~ 6v~12S' 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexble development use; , b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides For the development of a new and/or preservation of a working watertront use. `?"~ 12~~~I~ l aa!`fg "C~ l N~'C1~ ~'b~-`~fa2~ -'~-® ~Ll.~ ~~- ~~~~ 1~1~ N ~' DbL~ !~.)OtJLD ~~~ ~A(~ ¢~rC~ '3'4-1.~ C-~J~N~'~i?' U~a~ 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated bompliance witfi all of the following design objectives: a: The proposed development will not impede the nomral and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, eta; Variety in materials, colors and textures; Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ~( Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. RECE-t~n Page 3 of 8 .~~~N 11 20~~ pli'4NNING DEPgaTNiE,°VT CITY OF CLEgRWATEi~ ~~; ~- 1MP~~~u~~ I iH.4 RECE9~/E~1~ ~~AI\fNIt~G DCPARTf~EN~' ~~~ GF ~:L~ARWATER • lr~f~€TTEi~`I S[~B[iriTT~.L [ZEi~[i€r"2E€UiE€~iTS: (F€e~€biiity Criteria: Drovide complete responses to the applicable fleribiGty-criteria-forth=_-specie"c-tfse-as-6s*.ed ir. each ~o~ing ~istriof io v~hi~h the requested (use separate sheets as necessary} - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMVI~ATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manua€ artd 4242.A.2'I) '~ A STORMVi-ATER hiARRP.T[\tE MUST LE SUBMITTED M~ETf-f ALL ~tPPLIC~4T€ONS. Alt applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stornrvater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual: A reducfion in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ tf a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORFJIVVATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending aD feet beyond all property fines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of a!I structures; ^ AI(adjacent streets and municipal storm systems, ~,Prepncar? stnrmwaiar datantinn(raentinntirea invl~+ding top Qf bank Ina Qf gf~tpo and pi ~fietr_,nnirnl gfnipfi ira• ^ A narrative describing the pro_osed stennv;ater control plan inci!:ding tilt calculations and data necessary ta~demonatiate compiianc= :r:ith une City manual V ~rnr nga~ erGr;nyt~tar c;e5-an:~~:n(re=gn?iG1 re3 in^l+,~ding Orr: Gi~!~:~nl{, `_-~Ge Of gins g nd GCltiat G?'?t%Gi ct::~rr.:r:-±• G Signature. and seal of Pforida =registered Professional Engineer on a!! p!a-rs and ca!calatons. COPY 0= PEr~i i if~OUIKY LE! t ER Ors. SOv'Tii',ft1EST i=LOR?DA's%VAT ER tv"i=iN.43Etd1EtvT DiSTKiC T (S'J~°'=`Er~rriJ) ?EafvSiT SIJ3(~^,IT; F~L (S:`d~fill"D tip?ro.•a! is req:...ed aricrto ...>:.Gnc_ of Cit~+ 3uil i^g Pe.,< <), if applicable ^ ,~CKNO~LECF:>Ef~iEltiT OF STOr2f~r+Fk,TEr'€ ?'Lfttir r~EG1.UIR'Ef~ENTS fA?alicant must initial one of the foiiawingl: Stoml4S~ater plan as noted above is included -~~~~-- Stormvaterpian is :,ot required and e;;p!anafion narrative is atlaci:ed. At a rnnimum, a grading plan and finished floor ~~ elevations shall be provided. %AU i Icra - €F AFPLiCAT€GN tcEtPECtPv rcESuLTS iF~ T[-iE rcEc~UIE-cEi~iENT FOR A STORMIlvfA T En PLAN AN3 NONE :s`AS SEEN 3i.i3ftiiTTE.r`i, nPPLi!CATiON Rt!1ST SE €~ES[sSillEi TTED ~F--.ND S[GNi=_ CC~iiti T DEL ~;` MAY OCCUR. Ifyou have queue ions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public trllorl:s Adminisfration Engineering Department at (72n 551-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL 2EG?U6REMENTS: (CoQe Section 4202.A} SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 'i4 copies; ~; TREE SURVEY (including existing frees or, rife and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater}, and lotion, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please d=sign around the exis&ng trees; ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees S" Di3i-i or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. Q, LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (e. Reduce num5er of spaces). Prior to the submit<a€ of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shalt be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study wilt be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Q~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; i~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: i3uilding permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY Or RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Page 3 of 7 ORIGINAL RECENED .~:~~~ 11200? PI.HNNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER €~tRNNINC DIbI~ARTMENT C'IA' of Cf~EARWATEI~ • G. SfTE P€~N SElBf~ET T ~L r~EC~€~6RE(~EN T S: (~eetEan 4~2Q2.f~j Si T E PLAN with tie following information (not to exceed c4' x 36'x: {ndex sheet referencing individual sheets inc{uded in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 5D feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of ail EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and s¢e of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; V All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; Ali required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of ail public and private easements; _ Location of all sfreet rights-of way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existng public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer fines, maniples and lift stations,. gas a..d water lines; A-I paMcing spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required paring lot infQrior tands~ped ae-sas• Locaiion of a~ solid waste coneainers, recycling or frasft handling areas and outside mec'nanicai equipment and all required screening {per Secfion .,-2c~'i (D)() and (ndex ~70R}; _ Location of a(t landscape material; Location of all onsife and affste stanr~r„ater ranagement facilities; _ __ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of alt existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DPTA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabuiarfomz: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED itwei("tag units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: Total number, presented in tabular form wits tie O ~ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved paridng spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet ~ percerrtage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers ofall existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surFace ratio ([.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A_R_) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SfTE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); EXf~~ST~~II,,Ir~~G~~ REQUIRE PrZ, OPOSED ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ © ale, Do 0 IF "l ~r -r s~i Q FOR DEV ELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the fotlowirtg additional information on site plan: ' One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evatuate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earn berms; Lot tines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); ~RI~~N~~, Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ~ ~InC~I~(~ .~ Structural overhangs; UKIC~IIVH1. RECENED Page 4 of 7 ~~ ~.I 200 ~~I.At~IP91NC~ DEPARThi~i~N u CITY (~F ~:; E ~:~ RW~TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i-[. L~,f\IrtSGh~E{\tG PL~(~ SFJBf'~riFTTf:L i;ECEJfF~E11~~E{STS: (SecriGrt ~--''~.~-_.:~, LAiJDSCAPE PLAiJ with the following information (not to exceed 2" x 3o"j: kll existing and proposed structures; Names of abu~.iny- streets; ___ Drainage and retention zreas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _-_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape bufrers; Sight visibility triangles Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ _ _ tree survey}; , Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plarit ___ schedule; _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the see, description, speci ications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botani~l and common names; Typical planfing details for trees; palms, shrubs and around cover p anfs incf:~ding instruc5ons, soil moves, t;acknlling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and perceni=.ge rovered; Conditions o. a previo:.s Development arprova! (e.g. condi`ions inposed by thv Comm?:niy De. to;:,rnerrt ?oar'`. -f~ REDUCED COLOP L4ivDSC.AP= ?L%=i~t io s..aie (i; % ;C i?;; COi.~PR=iE!'~ISIV= LAl~?DSC?.PE p?r~r_n:,;fr; eppricetion s ?priicsb!e L,.ndsca^= ssociat~d .r ~:; the CompreF;_„ Landscape Program shalt exceed minimum Code requirements to onset the areas v/here minimum Code will not be meta i, ~Rjif t~if~iG EL r~ff,T `cf~iti €si ~N Sf_,F~fif6T l'rr-4F fr,E~{.~i~Ef~Ef~TS: (~6C~iQrt ~-2~~.~~:.~3; SUI`_D!A?G ELEVr": ~ t0^; D: ;=,~lbnh.GS -with the foilcwing infa^;;afian; All sides of atl buildings; Dimensioned; -- Coffers (provide one fu!! seed set of colored elevetions); t~Aaferials; ~ PEDUCED i3UILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 3'/z Y, i 1. .~. S(GN~GE: (Division ~3. SfG~sS /Section 3-~8~6) L~ All EXISTING freestanding and aftached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, fieigfit, etc.), indicate tvhetherthey will be removed or to remain. ~ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shalt include the street address (numerals) ~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (o % :: i i} (color}, if submi<iing Comprehensive Sign Program application. ~~`~E~~ ~~~~~~~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED pace 5 of 7 .1P~N ~ ~. 20Q7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~'NNING DFP'ARi'MEN'~" C€TY QI' CLCAI~tNA~'ER • • ~. TF:Ai=FIC II~~Pf~.C T S T E1L?l`: {Section 4^2t32.Q.`r3 and 4-~Oi.G} inciude if required by the Tramc Operations N;anager or hisiher designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will gene ate 100 or more new vehicle directional t ips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle (rips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is ort the City's annual fist of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent ediEion of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (i T ~) Trip General Ivianuai. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance vrth a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Tramc Operations h~znager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-552-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ~ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one ofthe following): Trai~~c impact Study is included. The study must inciude a summary table of pre- and poshdevelopment levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections idenf~ed in the Scoping RAeeting. . ra~c impact S'~=dy is not rquir2d. GPLET'f(~rtt - IF ~aP[ `C=~_ T Farrar r~EErrGEr~Y ,~,cct~rLl-;~ It~i T :-tEry~EOf~E.R.=fi~ERFT =riR .5~ T-'~~ r cGtCs` IS ^T c^~ e' ~/.llv rT ppfC F.~ i ~ tell^__CS[ h['Y ;tS ~~TiF"~-r.,~ F - ` t'J`~+ f SFfilT"r^!t e ~r:l 1 ....TV/ ~ trvt'v [- . en _s i.. [-. ~ .-.vv t . ~ r_€- v[ t [~fidv a ..~.Sv /141[ i f 'L tJ ~I'•~.-r`i ~ ivy\it-i~H``.~f T .~.^! A.~ t~r~i F` ~~.:G~:~~- y ~ h=s_ _ ~,rements, onac ~_ If ~~~ h a4S gUeStiOnS r ardi'?,^~ t a ,-ort[ : a title S^.~ky ;`~~itJli:'f4'irl:5 Ad~:ililiS.[c,i~;; =Rgtrl2?r(n~ u°pai' i t72i~ 0~2- y7v0. ..[_[ [. 4 i_. FINE ^L~?,fti .:R~~~`~.~`:. ~~-~[[pp~~ e£ ppr~:'_ _'s^ev. T'L SVvt C'4 AFC ~[V/F. Provide Fire Flow Caicuianons. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTIOIJ ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The vdater supply must b2 able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or lira pump. If a fire pump is required the eater supply must be able to supply 150°~ of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code *.o incl~.!de NFPA 13, ftrtFPA i4, NFPA 20, NFPP.291, and MFPA 1142 (P,nnex H) is required. ~ Acknov/I~dg=ment of frro flcw calcu{ations/water study euquirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow CalcuiationsliArater Study is included. Firo Flow CalcufationsNVater Study is not required. ~~~` G CAUTION - IF AP?LIGATION RE~/IEF~! RESULTS EN THE REC~UIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOl~ CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEFd SUBIJiiTTED, APPLICATPON MUST BE ~'LANNING RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. Cf~Y OF CL tf you have questions regarding these requirements, contacf the C'riy Fire ?revention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLkS Swom to and subscribed before me this X275 day of ~~t5~)--f?n~`v~-1 ~-~'..i~. , A.D. 20 C~ , to me and;or by _i ~ l'>QN' t ? • rr,-~:~.c ,who is personally (mown has produced as ide,^,tification. -Not ry p blic, My com fission expires: ORIGINAL RECEIVECI' Page 6 of7 /[~N ~ 1 2007 PLANNING dEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR "''-= ~ ° ~ Commission #BD246828 -a: ~:a_ _~~~. ~~a~; Expires: Oct 13, 2007 ""4'FOd ;~~Q ~ Bonded Thru "' ?.ti2nfic Bonding Ce., Inc. 1(~0 • • f~. ~FF[kJ~`-h`4'i E I G fi4i~Thi~ -'~:C:.-.~~ i . . r~oc~ide rrmesofalf prop-^, _,..,,,, .. - .._ - ..i:~ ~ `.d; -,_rr~ 2. ihaf (I am/we are) the owners} and record title holder(s) of the fallowing described proper*y (address or general Iccafion): ~~ ~ 3. ~ hat this property constitutes the properly for which a request for a: (describe regL'est) - _{~1~~ ~~ .=~Lr~1~~"%l~ ft_. d1~r ~:/ ~ 1r (w,,a~+-.1=~` (~ ~ -._.._.._._.__..._..----- ~. Ti'faf the iJn~°_rS:gnec (ilaS,~i' <.l'e~'opp0:~ ed aid u:~c5/d:i; a DUOinf: a.s r`,='L5e -, .. _'"=, ~ =~~ec~'`:e any p_titic:.s or.,,...., docums,..s n=.._sssry fc a,~eci suc` aetition; ~. t flat Ln;S aiilCiaVlt has been erecufed fo induce the City of Cleanrrafer, Florida to consider and act on the above describ=d prop=; ty; 5. That site visits fo the prcperty are necessary by C"riy representatives in order tc process this apaiication and the o~n~ ,er author~es City r epreseniQtty=_s to visit and photograph the properi5~ described in fhis applicatian; 7. That (!/we), the undersi nad~nority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. r~ ° - -~ y ~._ ~.._.._--cam ... ~'" `' perty Owner --- ----------- Propert}r~~vmer - - - Properly Owner i - ~ -~ -~---Property Owner -- ~~ATE OF FI_OF~II~~, COUNTY Or P6NcLLAS Before me the undersigned, an ofncerduly comrission=_d by/the laws of the State o(f~'=lorida, an this __~ ~ day of ~~~, C~ C`C~_ personally appeared ~ 7'(~~ G~~l' v ~~~ 5 ,~,r;-,o having been first duly sworn Depos..s and says t; ,at he/she fully understands the contents of the afidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public Signatur ` Notary Seal/Stamp ley Commission Expires: `~<,gY.PU@ ~,vnrt~A, lY~atthews ORff~ii~l~k =~°~~-,~~ _ Commission ~DD246828 ;N~;.. `~?:a~ Expires: Oct 1.,, 2007 ORIGINAL RI~s~EIVED ='TEO~~;.oQ; 3ondedThru """'~ Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. RECEIVED #.#~.~, lJ ~ ~~~ ~. ~ 2~~~ I~I~I~<{INC~ t31r~~ ~'~i~:?~~ `(.r~NNINC~ DEEARTMENT CITE O~ ~;l~E~.~Wf~T~~ .RT'~ OF CLEARWATER • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners-on-deed = PRINT-frill-names: ~~~'^--rte.."" ~~'4.(~.s'\ :' ~~ I v ~~..~'~~-P ~~( C ~' ~~ ,4~'~`~liR~l e 3 ~~/ ~"1 FR~~ 11/' k ~ ~6J6./ Y 1 ~ 11....x/ .~ `~~ ~ ~"!- 2. Th at ( I a /w m e ar e) the owner(s) and record t itle h er(s old ) of the following describ ed property (ad dre ss or g eneral location ) : ~ . ( '~ , y n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ / ~ ~ g ~g ~ ~ O p ~'~~y (~ ~ 3. That this prop ert y c onst itu te s t he p ro p e r ty forwhich a request fora: (de s c r i b e request) A ~ ~ - + r ~ ~ r ~ - ~ - 7 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ 4. Th at t he undersigned ( h as/have) appointed and (does/do) appoirrt: ~ ' ~ - I - ~'~~ ~^ 1 as (hisftheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (i/we), t I e undersigned ority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and corcect. ~P ' petty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS . Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Rorida, on this ~,~r1 day of .CLJ(~~,p personally appeared ~'_,y~ ~PNI ` Pi~ who having been first duly sworn Deposes arid says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. , Notary Public Sig ature Notary Seai/Stamp My Commission Expires: ORIGINAL ; ot~Y.Pia` , ~~~ A..Matthews RECENED ~ = '~ ~: Commission #DD246828 (~~ n ~Ri~iF+~ln •. ~~!7 ~ ~ 20~~ RECEIVVE~, 9'~6a~.~"~e= Expi Bs: ®ct 13, zoos onded Thru ' Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. PLANNING DEPARTMENt I~.~r (~ Ff ~~~~ CITY AF CLEARWATER '~4~h~NINC~ [~9~~i,`~~i~Ef~ ~I ~~ ~~,~:~epC MII~ATI'.~~ BUILDING FINISHES . P.~: MONARCH -SHERWIN WILLIAMS 8377 -BUILDING BASE COLOR OPTION: FASCIA BRICK P.2: PARHCMENT -SHWERWIN WILLIAMS 8188 -PARAPET COLOR P.3. MOONLIGHT WHITE -BEAR PREMIUM PLUS # 350E-1 -TRIM COLOR M.1 ;PATINA GREEN -UNA-CLAD COPPER COMPANY -METAL ROOFING, FLASHING & CAPPING ~~ I I ,, I~ ,I I' ~~ ~~ ,~ I+ ,~ I~ I _. ~- ,,, ~ ~e < ~~ ~ '~ ~r s tea. I _ . 1} `~~ ~ ~.~ ~~ / ~~ ~ . ~. ,, n // 1N3W121dd3a 9NINNb'~d 90t)Z 6 ~ ~,~ ~~ 43/11332! I~ lb'NI91~C? I I ~~~~ ~.:,. - ' - ' ~ .~ r~ ~ !r -y~-~r i -l ~k -- ~t ~ - - x a N ~O N r rn N lt7 r m m d L _O LL t d } d 3 0 o~ U o}i :® } S1 c i- o~ s ~ ~~ v i i Il I i I i i I j I~ l !j i ~~ ~~ i ~ ';-, `'~,. ~. ~- _ ~ - }q , _-- ow .. _~r 1 ~~~~ ~ r ...~ .% 2340 Drew Street ~~ ~~~ ~~ 630 Chestnut Street Clearwater.Floridn 33756 727.796.8774 727.791.6942 fax ~+',~ap~rrr,.rr .ray. "' ~Q~'4 - ~` ~~~~ . y•:{ '~-~'gTER~~`'~, °r'.rr~ X ~ ~' LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVEI.OPA91iN7- RNIEW February 21, 2007 Mr. Robert E. Gregg R.E. Gregg Architecture 630 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 I7"~' ~F LEAR~XIATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWA7-ER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL.SI:RVICIiS BUILDING, 1~0 SOU"rH MYR"rI.E AVT•.NUE, CLEARWAI-F.R, FLORIDA 33756 ~I'IiLEPHOMi (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-11062 (2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street) Dear Mr. Gregg: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (O) District at 2316 Drew Street with a maximum building height of 38 feet; front (south) setbacks of 25 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 feet (to building) and 15 feet (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a minimum off- street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew Street as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage of palms that can be incorporated into the landscape. plan from 25% to 29% at 2316 Drew Street; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet at 2346-2370 Drew Street as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 3.97-acre subject property is generally located at the northeast corner of Anna Avenue and Drew Street; 2. That the property is located within the Office (O) District; 3. That the property is located within the Residential/Office General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2- 1001.1 and 2-1004 of the Community Development Code; Pennt: Ilusis,vcn, Mnvctic )c~u~ I~cna~~, Ccx;nc:n.au:~usia: licn-r I t:uni:r<m, C<~t:~cn.>rn.>usrr: 13u.i.fcr~scm, Cc~unc:n_~ir:~Itst:ic C~~ri.r:rc A. Prnasi:~, Ccx nc:n.~nt~nsrt: "I:c~uni, Iavu'i.c»'~u-:N r nnD i~r•rnz?~I,crtvi•: ncruly Ii~~ti~t~» r:R„ February 21, 2007 FLD2006-11062 (2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street) Page 2 of 3 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-1004.B of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, further information shall be provided on the refuse enclosure detail that specifies the materials to be utilized, and further that said materials and the enclosure as a whole are in compliance with the requirements of Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department that includes the installation of shade trees along both sides of the north stair tower; two accent trees in the open area west of the north stair tower; two staggered clusters of three palms along both sides of the patio on the west side of the building; a shade tree at the southeast corner of the building; a staggered cluster of three palms to the northwest of the 45 inch Oak tree being retained; doubling the quantity of Washingtonia Palms in the terminal landscape islands for the parking tier east of the building; replacement of the Dahoon Holly along the north side of the cross access drive aisle with a shade tree; and the addition of another Southern Live Oak along the north perimeter landscape buffer (northeast corner) so as to maintain the required spacing of 35 feet on center; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground; 4. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 5. That the screen walls are painted to match the building; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 7. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by February 20, 2008); and 9. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of a Flexible Development approval (by February 20, 2008). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. February 21, 2007 FLD2006-11062 (2316, 2346, 2352, 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew Street) Page 3 of 3 The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B of the Community Development Code by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on March 6, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via a-mail at robert.te~ft~a,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, ~~ ~ . Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)I7nactive or Finished ApplicationslDrew St 2316 -Drew Street LLC (O) - ApprovedlDrew St 2316 - Development Order 02`20-07.doc