The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-02010 r~ le-arwater V . ~.. -~..- U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone:727-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~ 1,205.00 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04-OS-OS) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: James Holt The Clarkson Groua MAILING ADDRESS: 3100 University Boulevard. South Suite 200 Jacksonville, Florida 32216 PHONE NUMBER: (904) 359-0045 FAX NUMBER: (904) 356-1500 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Senior Citizens Services. Inc. (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Michael English WilsonMiller Inc MAILING ADDRESS: 1101 Channelside Drive Suite 400N Tampa Florida 33602 PHONE NUMBER: (813) 223-9500 FAX NUMBER: (8131 223-0009 CELL NUMBER: (813) 505-4892 E-MAIL ADDRESS: michaelenolish(a)wilsonmiller.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 940 Court Street Clearwater Florida 33756 ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) R (~ PARCEL NUMBER: 15/29/15!16830/003/0010 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARCEL SIZE: 2 219 acres/96 659 Square Feet ~i~-c F--C6€i~RW/4TEj~ (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 115 room hotel. The estimated value of the oroiect is aaarox $9million (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): SEE ATTACHED SECTION I Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) r ~~ v) \ DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a wpy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) SEE ATTACHED OWNER AFFIDAVIT D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE ATTACHED SECTION II 2. The proposed development v~ill not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHED SECTION II 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. SEE ATTACHED SECTION II 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. SEE ATTACHED SECTION II 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SEE ATTACHED SECTION II 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SEE ATTACHED SECTION II O Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: SEE ATTACHED SECTION III ORIGINAL RC APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING CIN OF CLEARWATER E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, incuding buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall incude the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWF MD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ~. Ackno ment of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ORIGINAL ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): RECEIVED _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Q PF~ ~ ~ ?OQ6 Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CITY OF CLEARWATER All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; ~ ~ _ Location of ali street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, incuding botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); _ Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/a X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. RECEIVED APB p 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings incuding height dimensions, colors and materials; ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 %: X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Sign plan to be submitted at a later date. ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Ptan. CITY OF CLEARWATER Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Ackno Bement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the follov~ing): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway egs d each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. r CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: ORIGINAL RECEIVED I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS appli tion are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of auth ize City representatives to visit and photograph the property ~ A.D. 20~ to me and/or by desc bed 'n this applicati vfho Is personally known has I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ produced as or identification. ,,, ,,.. p V I Carol oge MY COMMISSION # DD244414 E --ideve~Fnber 17, 2007 anuncniHRUTROYFAININSURANCE, Notary public, My commission expires: J `~ fir) the following described proper (address or genera! location): 13756 ~t for a: (describe request) approval to allow for the construction of a point: M~ chael English WilsonMiller, Inc. menu necessary to affect such petition; eannrafer, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; ntatives in order to process this application and tho owner authorizes City this application; ~/ Q~~Fic~v~-+t U foregoing is true and correct. ~ ~ ~ roperty Owner ~ ~,f ~ ~.,~ ~ ~ ~, C , ~ t~ 5 Ta ~ c p P2gS: Properly Owner Property Owner ~~jj ~` ~Property"~OwnAer :~iY ®n~ lL ~®~$~Cly laws of the State of Florida, on this ~ ~ ~~ day of _ `~ N1/j ~. Ti35"j 1 C' who having been first duly swam he affidavit chat helshe sag ed~.~' `t '' -Notary Public ORIGINAL RECEIVED S:IPlannirtg DepartmerrtlApplicaUon Fonrrsldevelopmenr raviewifTexibla development application 2005.doc ~ pR n r'/ '1006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 6 -Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~- Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~ Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION O SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION induding 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans * NOTE: a total of 15 sets of this application and all supporting documentation is Level Two Flexible Development Application. CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: required to be submitted in conjunction with a complete PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 02/14/05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: James Holt, The Clarkson Group MAILING ADDRESS: 3100 University Boulevard, South Suite 200 Jacksonville, Florida32216 PHONE NUMBER: __(904) 359-0045 FAX NUMBER: (904) 356-1500 CELL NUMBER EMAIL:_ jah@clarksonfl.com PROPERTY OWNER(S): Senior CItizens Services, Inc. (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Michael English, WilsonMiller, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 1101 Channelside Drive, Suite 400N, Tampa, Florida 33602 PHONE NUMBER: (813) 223- FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: (813) 505-4892 E-MAIL ADDRESS:michaelenQlish@wilsonmiller.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) STREET ADDRESS ofsubjedsite: 940 Court Street Clearwater Florida 33756 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached PARCEL NUMBER: (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) 15/29/15/16830/003/0010 ORIGINAL RECEIVED PR 0 7 2006 PARCEL sIZE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2.219 acres/96,659 Square Feet r~QF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 3 ~ • PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): GINAL RECEIVED A pQ ~ "~ 2~~6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER s C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this pplication are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City represe tatives.t visit and photograph the pro rt escribe in t is ap licati n, / V ; "-, Signature of property owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of A.D. 20~ to me and/or by ,who is personally known_ has produced as identification. ~,, Notary public, My commission expires: Carol P. Vog COMMISSION # DD244 14 EXPIRES November 17, 2 07 BONDEDTHRUTROYFAININSU ANCE.INC Page 3 of 3 ~~ ,tll:1CJ,~tlIC ICCI~ HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? ~] add _ hotel rooms HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCEMIVE POOL? IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES _~ NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 I Page 2 of 3 :~, • • Y /~ ~ ~e a~wate _~ , U Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4747 Fax:727-562=4755 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 3 COPIES OF THE ORGINIAL APPLICATION INCLUDING SITE PLANS CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN STORMWATER SERVICE DISTRICT APPLICATION PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: The Clarkson Company MAILING ADDRESS: 3100 University Blvd. South, Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL 32216 E-MAIL ADDRESS: N/A _ PHONE NUMBER: X904) 359-0045 CELL NUMBER: N/A FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER (S): The Clarkson Company (See information aboveZ (Must include ALL owners) ~RIGt~lRt. 4ECE6VE[~ ~'LAiVNiNG ®~PR~RTMENT AGENT NAME (S): WilsonMiller, Inc. ~,~~~~~ ,,,~ MAILING ADDRESS: 1101 Channelside Dr., Suite 400, Tampa, FL 33602 E-MAIL ADDRESS: jdow cr,wilsonmiller.com PHONE NUMBER: (813) 223-9500 CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 2/2312006 43323 Ver 01!- JDOW CAp43 05211-001-004 - 0 ti i ' • • B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of the subject site: Court Street between South Prospect Ave. and Ewing Ave•, Clearwater, FL 33756 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 15, Township 29 S, Range 15 E, Subdivision 16830, Block 3, Lot 0010• Block 001 Lots 0120 and 0250 PROPOSED USE and SIZE (type of business, number of dwelling units, acreage of building) Proposed Hotel, 115 Rooms, 0.27 Ac (11,864 SF) IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING PROPOSED square feet square feet BUILDING/SIDEWALK 19,954 SF 18,792 SF VEHICULAR USE AREA 48,599 SF 48,113 SF POND AREA N/A N/A IMPERVIOUS TOTAL 68,553 SF 66,905 SF PERVIOUS AREA 28,103 SF 29,751 SF TOTAL SITE AREA acreage FOR CITY OF ('LEARWr~TF,R USE ONLY $ 1.8,595:00/per acre. up to 1.5 acres (e:g. 13~O~sq. ft = 0.0303 acres; 18.595.00 x 0.03== 5563.45) 518,5y5.U0 x acres - 5 ORIGIPJ,Q(. OIZ °~' i } r~ 206 5 75.000.00 liar }~iojccxs larger than 1.5 acres i'LANtiJfNv n~PNRj!v9ENT l'LTtS'S,OQO~per acre ~y (e.~~. tcital project tiizc 3.5 >cres; $75,000.00 + (3.5 acres x 5 25.000.0(1) = 516250(~tr) OF ~FE~RV'Jr~l`ER `~ 75,000 ~~ ( acres x'$ 25,OO0.U0) = 5 TOT, 1. - Ver. ioo- CAgC3 ~~, ADDITIONAL POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAMS: (e.g. covered parking/well car program, xeriscape landscaping) 'A C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representative to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ~--__. r ~~-~~~ ~.~ - , ;Signature of property owner or representati e r STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PL~TELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~~~~_ day of ~(L~..i'_.~ , who is personally known has produced Notary public, My commission expires: •,s~.'e~~% Carol P. Vogel .'?4'~ ¢ _,,: *: MYCOMMISSION# DD244474 EXPIRES ~~. :o November 17, 2007 '';k of F;oQ.~~ BONDED TNRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC. ®iC~l7~I V/'S4, RECEIVE[ ,4P~ n'~ ~0~6 ~t~a~vr~~~~ C~EF'ARTiViEN3 CITY OF CLEAR~'J~1TER A.D 20l;~ to me and/or by as identification. - Ver: lorr CAp43 04/06/2006 10:27 901-388-5765 • ,,_,~ ~.: ~- 1~ Sit r. !~.r` •,~Mv BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 02 Clearwater l=tr® 8. Rescue 610 Franktie Street ~- Ctearvirater, Florida 33756 Publlc Works Administration - t~nBineering Dapsrfanent 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Sups 200 -~ Clearwater, Flnt~lda 33756 (Revised 03129!2008) This worksheet is required bo be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DF~C meeting for any project that is mare than 3 stories or rhos than 30 feet in heighk abav® the lowest Fir® dept vehicle access point or for any other project shat will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before any pEtmits for new building construction; building expansion or tire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwaser. lnfotmatlon and design must comply with >=lorida Building Cede, Chapter 9 -Fire Pn~ct9on Systems, Florida Fire Preveptton Code to include applicable N1=PA Code {NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, ?.91 and 1142 Annex W) and A1NWA M-'t7 ~ Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants,. Project Name; __borantown C~.ea~•water ate~sidence Inn ProjectAddr~ess•_ _940 Court St., Clearwater, fiL 33756 (induCalAtt~ah Copy ofActual Test Shee#) Area # Classifioa5on Descrip~on of HazarrJ Protected (Commodity DescrlpObn, Shoran Heipltf artdArrangemanf, lf~ppl(catrle).• Stair Stand i e SyStOm Demahd @ rood Corxido,r Light - H'zd - _ sight hazard aorzi,doar calculation ~oam - Li htr Hzd U~, to 4 head top s_loo~r room calculat~.on - _Lobb~y __ ~ _tiight_ Had _.. Cammoz~ area ~. -- AttecA Ada! Sheetslf Necessi~ry ~ 1~E ~'FI\/~~ Q P~ ~ "~ 20 ~6 Pam ~ °f 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV~/ATER y 04/06/2006 10:27 901-38765 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 03 ~; Aroa # System Type Area (sq. tt.) Density (gpm/>~ Inside Nose (gpmJ Outside Hose (gpm) ~~~' _S-tand~~~ c _ __ Cozridor ~~_ ' _ ion R ao m _- - e ~_.-.Bead .0.5- 100 Lobb het 1500 .10 _ ~_ 100 At18Ch AddlHprtat Sheets IFNBCessely Total Needed Fire Flow {N.F.F ) Is F.xis~ng System Supply Sufllclent t0 Meet N 1' 1= Above? No Yes Attach Adiditienel Sheets ~'Neeessery Ifi Project InGudea Fire pump, Supply the Faffowing' Fire Purrap Inforrnatian: Pump Capacity: ___~_OOQ_ gpm Rated Pressure: 14 0 psl On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?)' -_1VA-_-_ - - Chum Pressure• psi Pressure Q 1509~o Ftaw: psf Preparer !dame- Company Name; Mailing Address City. State: gip- Phone. Fax: P. F: Seal ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 2 of 3 AP~2 07 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV~/ATER 04/06/2006 10:27 901-38~ 65 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 04 ~ ~ i ire Prevention hems fp be Addressed Prior to DRC Appt~l,-, 1 Wrovide Fire Flow C$1CUfatbns / Wa}qr Study by a Ftt~E PROTECTION ~NGIN~fi to assure an adequate Vsrdt®r sulfpl}r fa avalfabte end to d~r~trlne if any upgrades are r+aqulred by the de-reloper due to fhe inspect of this project.. ?11e water supply musrt be able tp support thrj needs of arty requirbd fire spdnktar, standpfpe and/or flra pump. !f a fire pump is required, the water supply r1'lust be able to supply 150°la of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 20x4 Florida Fire prbvenilon Code bo include NFPA 33, NFPA 14, NFf'AZB, NFPA ~A1, and NFPA 1142 (Annex Ifi is neq~dred, 2. When an FDC is required, it shall b®a rrrinlmum of 15 feet frorn bu7ding end shah have a fire hydrant within 40 fee#. This hydrant shall net be located on tine same main as the Flre Sprinkler and rrrust be on the supply side of a double detector check valve. This hydrent is fi addition to the hydrant that is required for firetightlng purposes that is to be within 30o feet of bulldin®. as the hose lays, and on the same Side of the street as the protect„ 3 Provld® and show on th® plan a minimum 30-foot fuming radius for em~eigency v®hide ingress and egress at al! entrances and exits,. 4 Provide and show on thra site plan 24 fa8t of vutdth at drtvswaya /drive aisles for 9m9ig6nCy uehide ingress and egress for front and r9ear parking lots.. Where driveways are apli} by an island wish oneanray traffic, each side of the Island shall provide and show on file site plan 2t) feet of width at the drnrennrays on each side of the island,. 8. Provide a Fire Department access ro2dway (with tum-around, Y, 7 or cul..de-sac) in accordance with NFPA 1,. A Fire Department acoesS roadway must have 24-foot clear width and 14 foot vertical cl®arence, and be capable of supporting the weight of Fire I]eparhnerrEVehic!®s (80,000ibs). ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ 7 2006 Page3of3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVUATER 04/06/2006 10:27 901-38~ 65 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 05 x:15 pm Case Nn~rtber: FLD2006-0201 0 - 940 COURT ST TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX; No flax, E-MAiL: No Email Senior Cidzcns Services 940 Court St Clearwater, F133756 Owner(s): The Clarkson Ciroup 3100 University $1vd S ate 240 Clearwater, PI 3221,6 TELEPHONE: 404 359- 0045, FAX: 404-356-1500, E-MAIL: No Email Appiitant 1~I1C17flc1 M ERf,*11Ch 1 ] O 1 Channelside Drive Tampa, Fl 33602 TELEPIONE: 813-223-9500 ex284, FAX: 813-223.0009, F-MAIL: mi cltaelengl ish t~wilsonmiil cr.com )Representative; Location: The 2,19 acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Court Street and Ewing Avenue, Atlas Page: 289A Zoning Diatrlct: D, Downtown Request: Piexible Development request to construct 1 [ 5 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Comrttunity Development Code. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations lveighborhootl AitspCiAtiiOn(s): ClearwaterNcigl-borhoods Coalition TBLEPH'ONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No rmaii Clearwater, Pt 33758 P O Box 8204 Presenter: Roben: Tefft, Pianncr III Attcndeoa ><nelnded: ~'he DRC reviewed this applicAtion with the following comments: General Engincoring: Development Rcvicw Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Pagc 30 1 _ Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30-feet per City of Clearwater Contrnet Specifications and Standards Index #108. The tinning radii shalt be 30' at all driva'way entrances. (I-andscapa and C(vll Plan) In onalaw by do this, rrp wlll be mov/ng tfi® Ewing Street entranc®b fha no~-th. 2. Note ott the plan that the 15-foot sanitary sewer casement hfla been vacated per O,R. Book 14829, pages 2257 and 2258. It shall be Hated on the plan that the 1S-Foot sanitary sewer easratnent has been vacab®d. A11 of the abo{~to be_addrosaed prior to CDS The foilowi~ to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide a copy of an approved right-o£--way permit from D.O.T- for alt work proposed in Court Street right-of--way. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT araonnoe.aas~ ver;ou.NOHNRpN CITY OF CLEARV'JATER onr~ DS111-002-000• • D 04/06/2006 10:27 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 06 • 2. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will rctnove/rcl.ocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part ofthis development, including reclaimed. water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious arose.) Noted. 3. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.495), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.k'.P.D. (bark flow proventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension kbom the tap to the device. Applicant is also tesponeibic for alt associated fees and all other installation fees. Noted. 4, Provide a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main prior to issuenec of a building permit. The health permit application form(s) can be found at: www.~cp.state.t'I.us/w~ter/dristkinewater/ o s.htm A copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domostic Muster mapn shall tie provided, 5. All polyvinyl chloride pipes shall be laid whit an insulaeecl. l2 gauge A.W.G. solid xtrand copper wire wound around the pipe forming one complete spiral pet joint of pipe. ThiA wire is to be continuous with splices made only by methods approved by tho Engineer. This wire is to be secured to all valves, tees and elbows. See City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standardq, Part "B", Technical Specifications, Section N, Article 4f _02(B)(2). Noted. 6. Brick paver crosswalk in i0-foot right-of-way easement on west side of Ewing Avenue Shall be constructed in &ecordanee with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #1 lti. Provide detail on plans- Brick paver detail will spt3ciify the City of Cleanerafar Standards index #116 (Landscape Plan) 7. All utility pole relocations to be coordinated with the owners of such facilities as-noted on drawings. The pole relocations will accommodate the proposed sidewalk and/or drive apron(s) installation within the right-of--ways of the adjacent streets. City requires a 2-ft. horizontal clearance from edge afsidewalk to any vertical obstruction. Noted. A ~~ft horizontal cl®arance from edge aF sidewalk to any va3rtical olsstruCtlon shall be provided. 8. Show on the plant location of proposed Fire Department Connection (F..D.C.) The IocatSon oflhe Fins bepartmertt Connection shall ba shown on #re plan. 9. Sheet #!2 and iF8 will be reviewed when Submitted ae part of a buitd.ing permit application; no reviewlcomment will be provided at this time. Noted. General Note: If the prnposed project necesrrtates infrartt~ucture modificatdwas eo satafy site-spectre water capacity and preeruro requirements and/nr wastewater rapacity requit~ments, the ntodificatlona shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants arc to lie installed, the installation shall be completed and in .ce~~dcc prier to construction in accordance witJ~ Fire Department requirements. General Note: ,t7RC review is a prerequisite far Ruildtng permit Revie+~ ; additional commenr_s ntay be forthcoming upon submittal ofa Building,permit itpplr.'cation. 3J9D/Q09&MOOY Ver; Ott-eJOMN90N cvru 0611-002.OOa _ a ORIGINAL RECEIVED aPR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/06/2006 10:27 Tnvironmeatal: 901-388-5765 • BOUNDS&GILLESP~ u PAGE 07 ] . Stotxttwater ]3uy-In Application tttust be submitted to cnr,ironmental division. We will conS-n1 with Bqb Moran on Monday Apri13, x008 :hart rve need to submit :rife appl/cation, Wie have al-eady contplei~ed i~ and Niches/ has signed it, Fib; 1. Taming radius for Emergency vehicle access is requited to be 30' minimum Show i'RiOR TO CDB The tumirig radii shall be 30' at aq driveway entrances. (Landscape and Civil plan) Changan will be made 2 ,All drive aisles are required to be 24' minimum width Show on plan PRibR TO CDB All dr9ve aisles shall bA a minimum of 24~' in urldth. 3 . I•Iydrants must be installed Every 300' in parking area. Show on plan )PRIOR TO CA)s Hydrants shall tae installed as r+aquested. 4. FDC for fire sprinicier system must be Within 40' of a ire hydrant and at least 15' away from building. Show on plan PItIOA TO CAB Afire d®pat'bment connection shall be shown on the plan as requestrad. 5.'I'his building is required to have an automatic Class 1 Standpipe system with a fire pump, Acknowledge and show ptoposed location of the fire pump i'itiOR'1'O CDii 6. Provide Tire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION .ENGiNTER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades arc required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB, Harbor Mt~st~er: NO Comments I.~egal: No Comments Land Resources: i . If trees #3 and 4 arc to be preserved reroute the proposed irrigation and water mains prior to CD1s. As stated in an email from Robert Tatir: on 02.23.06 we are not requlned tp submit a Irrigation plan, only that a noUe be included on the landscape plan that automatic, 40096 irrigation coverage will be provided. Any irrigation lines around trees 3 arld 4 would be reroufied or pieced at grade to eliminate conflict write the root syst®m~ During Oli!G n ways notbal Ntat th®sfandard disfarrce sha>,ld be half the DBH 4f th® b~ bunk ORIGINAL Examble f0°OBH troe, 5' c/aarartce Earths watnrp/pas. RECEIVED QPR 0'7 2006 alsormon-aa0az v«:o11-EJOwrv9oN aWV X6211.002006 - 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/06/2006 10:27 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESPIE - i • 2 . Place the sidewalk "on gFadc" under the canopy of tree #45 prior' to CUR. A hate shall Ge provided oft the Civil plan outing that the sidewalk shall be on~rad® under ttte canopy of tree #4S, 3. Provide a 8eetion through the sidewalk (on grade), tree #45 and the proposed parking lot (pervious concrete on grade), Note, no pervious concrete detail waA shown on the landscape plan as stated on the site plan. Provide poor to CDB- PAGE 08 The landscape plan will include location and d®1Ril for the peryious pavement near ttte SE corner of tfte parking Iot Per D12C request; eve wfH also be,provfdfng a detail from Court Sheet to the Psrlrfng !at show/ng the cl~rlge /n grrsde and tlye pavepent fn re,Iatfon to Ste 52'° Crete (afF15) Catt-dscaping: t. Pursuant to Community Deveioptttcnt Code (CDC) Section 3.1202.$,1.., at time of installation shade trees shall, have a minimum cafipet of 2.5 inches. The Landscape Planting Schedule (sheet LP-502) does not provide the proposed caliper of the f ive Oaks and Drake Elms. 'fire Landscape Schedule will tm updated to include lira installed caliper size for all listed trees. 2, Pursuant to Community Development Codc (CDC} Section 31202.8.1 •, shade trees obeli be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area- The proposed Live bak on the south lido of the Prospect Avenue ingress/egress drive and the two (2) DrakC Elms located in the terminal landscape islands at the northeast corner of the site do not comply with this requirement. The landscape islands will t1e adjusted to allow for a shade tree planted with a minimum of flue feet from any Impervious area. 3. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.B,1,, at time ofinstxliation palms shall have a minimum often feet (10') clear and straight trunk. T'he Landscape Planting Schedule (sheet LP-S02) does not indicate the provision of straight trunk. The Landscape Schedule will be updated to include the minimum of ten ft clear and straight trunks for all palttts. 4. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.E,1.., one (1) interior tree is required for every I50 square feet of required interior greenapace. As the development proposal requires 4,658 square feet of interior greenspace, a total of 31 interior trees arc required; however only ZS interior trees are proposed to be provided.. Areas exist where additional trees/palms can be prwidcd that would unable the development proposal to meet the above requirement, Staff can locate these areas for you, if needed, at the Development Review Committee (DItC) meeting. In grderto meet tit®'r+aquln3d 31 trees we will add an additional 6 shade trees to increase from 25 to 31 interior trees. 5. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CAC) Section 3-1202,F,.1., 50°/n of the required interior grcettspace shall be shrubs. It appears that the required is being met; however provide calculations that support that thiP regviremen.t is being met. interior greenspace calculations will he included en the landscape plan for requlre±d shn,bs, ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR p'7 2006 srsWZ006.44D8$ VOr.01b EJOHNSOk CMA~ OG211-DOQ-000••0 PLANNING DEPARTME CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/06/2006 10:27 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 09 6. "17te proposed landscaping Along the south side of the Ewing Avenue ingress/egress drive aisle conflicts with the sidcwalk.l2cvise the IAndscape plan accordingly, Ensuro that the Live pak tree is planted the minimum required five feet (5') from any impervious areas [ref. Section 3-1202,8.1.). The plantltrg within the landscape island t+vill be adjusl;ed to coordinate wltft the proposed sidewalk on t}re site plan. 7. Please provide the landscape planting schedule (found on sheet 1,P-502) on the lAndscapc plan (sheet LP-l01). The landscape planting schedule will be Included on the landscape plan (sheet LP-1d1j Parr And RccreAtios: No Comments Sbormwpter: 1. Prior to D.O., the Bngineer is to provide calculations showing thAt the proposed development has less impervious arcs khan the existing sift. NOTED Solid westc: Na Comntcnts Tratlf'ic 1~nginearirtg: 1. Ariveway on Ewing Avenue does not meet the wnneetion spacing requirements of 125-feet from the intersection with Court Street. (Community Development Code SCCtIOn 3.102.). We are approx. 25' short from fhe minimum standard. The 125 fit is based on the design speed of 35 oX less and this chart does not show a lower design speed, In order not to lose parfcing Spaces, a n~deslgn of the partcing in the coKner would possibly bring the paved area closer to fha Specimen tree in the Per DRf:; In order to achieve t1m 30' radius nequiiad on Ewing Stn~eet, vi+e are going to have >b move the •nt-~Ir1ca north beyond fJre 125' dtstgnce, 2. Provide stop sign and stop bar per current MUTCD where appropriate. lirrlll tm provided and shown on the slte/landscape plants. 3. Provide a larger radius or flare fipr vehicles turning right into the dttiveway on Prospect A.vpnue- ORIGINAL Radii tow both entrances will ba 80' RECEIVED 4. Provide wheel stops where parking spaces abut a sidewalk, A {~{~ n '7 2006 Wheel $~Ps will ba.provlded on the Landscape and 3ibe Plans. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5 Provide an accessible route from public sidewalk to the building's accessible entrance. CITY OF CLEARV'/ATER (Chapter 1 t Florida Buiding Code Section 11.4-3.) 31301300A- R4D62 Va~:01F EJOHNBON eM~13 o~o~-Dezoeo-- e 04/06/2006 10:27 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 10 ,. • ,.,._.` ~- p~ible grade change Fn the sidewalk or small ramp near the playa wlll allow access from the publle sidewalk. Per ~: AccesSlb/a ramp will be shown on SftB and landscape Plans. ti. Revisions to 1Y~aftiic Impact Study will be required, Contact has been made r,rlfh City 7ranspor~tFon Staff to detarntfna what addltlonal Information must be Included. Par DRC: Scott Rice with the City of Cle~arwattrr will ISO/Mw up with Benett Elbo io s~ p/' ifs is en Issue fiotlow/ng the rastrbmittarl ofa banspo,Kation anelysfs on Mgr~ch Zit, ,2008. 7. Show driveway and parking spaces for proporty to the notch. Suggest incorporating existing driveway on south prospect Avenue for assess management requirement, Per DRG; MRe w-7! show a slc+®tcb of a po[erJrda/ errtranca coming fn ifiom the exfsSng Prospect D-ivew®y. Durfng DRC Jeff pow noted that the radius of that access ptsfnt woes sfgnfTCantly under the ~tl ` raqullemant; and therefore we could probably not dBs/gn to standard, fire City acKnow/edgsd that this might be 8 probla>At, and said that if we can show Uravn a ska(t;lr ffiat proves ft, they wfl/ acceptiE All of th®abave to be addnassed prior to CDB, Qenexal Note(s): 1) Contp[y with Che current Transportation Impact Fee t)rdinance and feo schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building permit .Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Auilding Pcmtit Application. Planning: 1. The tesponac provided to General Applicability Criterion #4 does not address how the design of the development will minimize traffic congestion, The response does state that the proposed use viii generate fewer trips titan the existing use attd that pedestrian connections will be improved, but nothing regarding the minimization of traffic congestion through design, to Cmma»IS,~v~rs wilt respond ado the roa[uctlon of cangestl'on. We can submit it as a Response 2. pursuant to Community Development Code (CbC) Section 3-806, no wail shall be boated within anysight-of way easement unless specifically authori~cd by the City Engineer, The proposed retaining wall will encroach within the right-of--way casement alottg Ewing Avenue. the Clty Engineer is avlrare of the easement as weft as the wa-- that wlll have to take place w-th-n the easement. During discussions with the Clty Engineer It was determined that the easem®rtt was net shown on their maps. Per DRC: Per my discussions wlth the ,Enginaara9ng Department early on in this procoss, the City has no otgefa- rscorxl o}' this ROW s~asement. Scott Rica with Englnaerxrrg Is going to look into this and get back with us, / will call hfm on Monday to follow up. 3. pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A., in addition to the provision of sight visibility ttiangles at the intersections of driveways and rights-of--way, 20 foot Sight visibility triangles must also be provided where two (2) rights-of--way intersect, Provide revised site and landscape plans. ORIGINAL 31te triangles wlll be added at the Irtt®rsecHons of ~Aling /Court and Prospect / Court, RECEIVED 4. pursuant to CT]C Section 3-911, all utilities shall be installed underground. Provide a notation an ~ PR n ~ 206 the utility plan to this effect. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3l30710D8•AlDQQ Ver. 071.5JOHN90N OM~R oe~g1-062•oDO•- D • 04/06/2006 10:27 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 11 Notation will be added do tih~e si!be plan. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 5. Pursuant to the Cleat<vater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences/walls shall complement and ~ ~R ~ ~ 2006 be consistent with the principal structure with regard CO materials, texture, size, shape and. color. The retaining wall section drawing denotes that the color of the stucco finish is "to be PLANNING DEPARTMENT determined". ,lt is suggested that rite color be consistent with the primary color of the principle CITY OF CLEARWATER structure. PurthCr, please clarify how the "Old Chicago" veneer with be consistent with the principal structtrc. The stucco colorwill be coslsislsent with the building stucco (shown on building elevations), "`Old Chicago" Veneer is to be used along the bottom of the wall in a similar manner to the building. 6.Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown pcdcvelopmcnt Plan, buildings shall .have a distinct "base", "middle" attd "cap". T'he "base" of the proposed. building is clearly defined by its unique Color and materials/architectural elements. However, the "cap" tacks definition and blends far too easily with the "middle" of the building. We will continue to Wvork on created a greater emphasis on the "`cap" of the buildlrrg. The rendered elevations sent earlier this week have a stronger "cap" and could be used for this meeting to show our progress to achlevirtg the desired effect 1 will be forw2rrding Pefe's D,r,~wings to Robert T'ell~ far review 7 . Provide a detail for the proposed fencing co enclose the swimming pool area. Added t0 the existing drawings, sea attad>led fill®. We are still going to need an illustration of a section of ilr/s fence. 8 . Provide floor plans for the proposed hotel- Also, provide a roof plan for the hotel. Floor plans an3 In the dt-awing gle, I senfi colored ones earlier this week. Roof plan has been drawn and is irf the drawing file, 9. Depict on the site plan and/or roof plan the locations of all mechanci&1 equipment including a/c and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be ~crcened from view of adjacent properties and nights-of way. Poter~al roof equlpmen# has bin located on the roof. Pool equipment has been located next to the pool deck, An elevation and descrip{lon of screen wall is provided In the drawing. Par DRC: I have sent the drauvings of dt®Roof layout to Rober# Tei9ft 1 informed him that t+ve do not knoMr spacfRts as be the location of lire individual mechanical compegdnis yet ] 0. Depict the locations of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site plan and landscape plan. .Please he advised that ail proposed light fixtures/poles must meet the requirements of CDC Section 3-1302. The light fixtures are currently cn tite hardscape plan and will be copied fie the landscape plan and site plan. A note will be added for verification of appliance with CDC Section 3~130~ I l.Jn addition to the section drawing of the retaining wall already provided, submit an elevation drawing of the retaining wall. A retaitting wall elevation will be Included with the section. 12 . Provide c.larificetion as to the depth of the recesses in the f,~cadc ofclte proposed building. A diagram showing the building level profih3s has been developed to show the building necosses. NdOM00A M002 vnr. 011- GiownrsoN GN,A osa71.0n2-ono-- n • 04/06/2006 10:27 901-38~ 65 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 12 J. i 3. While npa~ - ---- provisfon exists within the Catnmunity Tj~eiopment Codc regarding the proximity of a refuse Cttcl0sur2 tp a 8witnntin it is recommended that pu 8 pool, these are not necessar;ly the most compatible of elements. may exist re ardin y consult with the T•lealth Dept, to ensm'c against any provisions that $ g this issue, if any. selpar~te the two t}Lnc~tiort~s- Most of the ash fro ~e ~k Snd the duet hotel tMill be p8ter location to help Per DRC: /cal/eat !/ie Health ~~r arasbe and dry wasl~p. ~-egaMing th® distance of a t rsnsn~ and they stated that Hteir wrQ-e do spa~ihc roquirertte>tts /tipster M dte pool. Robert Tetlq' was OK t+rfth this. 14. The proposed drive aisle adjacent to the finttt of the hotel a drive aisle, then as a one-way d~~,p aisle (as a dro pP~ars to function first as atwo-wa aisle based upon its dimensions. Also, those two-off lane), and then again as a two-wa y parking tiet;5. The se y drive aisle portions ittclude y drive gmcnt~ of this drive aisle will cottfliCt with one another; tharefoorect dicular rocontmcnded that the entire drive aisle is redesigned as a one-way drive aisle whit angled parking tiers and do not enter signage, as appropriate, We have redesigned th®drivewe seems to wo Y and parking to accorsding ~ the t+ecomrrtandadons of f#te I'RC. h rk quite well butwill used to be addntgsed be Wilson Miller civil and landsca way elgnage will also be needed. p®. drte_ Per ORC: I have fort~rded the sketch ~ Robert Teiifll to soak at fire proposed Iayou~ Other; No Comments Nptes; This development proposal has been tentative.ty scheduled for rho May 16, 2005 CDIi agenda. ire order to remain on this agenda, submit IS collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comtttents by NOAQ, Apri17, 200ti. ORIGINAL RECEIVED A ~~ (7 `~ 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV/ATER araaaooo~ «oez ~ ai. ~or+~soN ar.i OF211-0Q7~4-9 04/06!2006 10:27 03/32/286 88:09 F ~ Cle~ar~ater ~~ 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESP~ PAGE 13 727 1,.,961 FRJBLIC lJTZLZT:e..~ ~y AGE 91 u ~~x M~s~~-~E ~~~ ~~ RJ~~~,r~rat~ ~ crrv o>; ~~~Rwar~R ~ Pus~~c uT~~.r~~Es MAR ~ ~ Zoos 1sso~c ARcrUt~s ~av~. ~, CLEARI1vATER, I^~,. 33766 Pw4NE (~2r~ Asa-~8ea PAX (~z7) 56,~M149~1 ~...._.r.,...._.._ ORIGINAL i ro: ~ ~ b c~uu ,~ QPR ~ 7 2006 Lc~carrC7~N: `~-~:,~-1~s-n~--~~ ~ ^ ~~, PLANNING DEPARTMENT FAx ~uu~rsE~~ ! ~~ ~ - p pp __ , FRAM= ~'7'°"L_.. .~'-- oATE~ ,~-- 1.- ~ rrln+~~: ~~~.~~ sr' ~Y~ ~ l9 K~„~ r, ~r~. ~ J ~;~,,,,~,~„ inn fVUN}BER 01= PA~~ES {1NC,r;UDING T1Y15 CQ]{,ER PAGE -~,.,,, ~~ 04/06/2006 10:27 93/31/2Deb tls:09 ~a~ ,96~ 901-388-5765 BOUNDS&GILLESPIE PAGE 14 - PU9LTC UTIUTT~.~ PAGE 02 ~~~ V 1I 1 ~~ 1 CITY ©~ GL.~'ARWATER WAl"f~R ~7EPARTI~IF,NT -- ~ g ~ ` ORIGINAL ~ A ~~ ///~ P / ti !f~ p~1 r 2 ~2~' ~~~ r ~D ~l ~ j ~ ~ D~p q y~ ~1 / PLANNING ~ ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1: • All of Lots 11 and 12 and that portion of Lots 13 through 18 inclusive lying on the northerly side of Court Street in Block C, COACHMAN HEIGHTS REPEAT, including the South 1/2 of vacated Haven Street on the northerly side of said Lot 11, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 26, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL 2: All of Lot 1 and that portion of Lots 2 and 3 lying north and east of Court Street in Block C, COACHMAN HEIGHTS REPEAT, including the South 1/2 of vacated Haven Street lying north of and adjacent to said Lot 1, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 26, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ALL OF THE ABOVE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: A portion of Block "C" COACHMAN HEIGHTS REPEAT, recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 26 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, lying in the northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, described as follows: Begin at the intersection of the northerly right-of-way line of Court Street and the west right-of- way line of Ewing Avenue and run, along the northerly right-of-way line of Court Street, along a curve to the right having a radius of 308.58 feet, an arc length of 79.80 feet, a chord length of 79.58 feet and a chord bearing of N.45°39'55"W.; thence N.38°15'23"W., along said northerly right-of-way 202.89 feet; thence, along said northerly right-of-way, along a curve to the left having a radius of 339.23 feet, an arc length of 306.12 feet, a chord length of 295.84 feet and a chord bearing of N.64°06'31"W., to the east right-of-way line of South Prospect Avenue; thence, leaving said northerly right-of-way line of Court Street, N.00°02'24"E., along the east right-of- way line of South Prospect Avenue, 97.06 feet to the centerline of the vacated Haven Street; thence, leaving said east right-of-way, S.88°59'11"E., along the centerline of the vacated Haven Street, 449.11 feet to the west right-of-way line of Ewing Avenue; thence, leaving the centerline of the vacated Haven Street, S.00°03'20"W., along the west right-of-way line of Ewing Avenue, 433.23 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2.219 acres more or less. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Q PR ~ 7 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV'/ATER The Clarkson Group -~wntown Clearwater Residence In• 1. Summary of Applications -Description of Request Senior Citizens Services is the current owner of the property at 940 Court Street, which is the subject of this application. WilsonMiller, Inc. is submitting the application package for The Clarkson Group of Jacksonville, Florida in order to obtain the entitlements necessary to construct a Marriott Residence Inn on the site. The proposed project is to be a 115-room Marriott Residence Inn Hotel. The total square footage of the building will be approximately 81,439 square feet, and be 67 feet in height. The hotel will include a mix of room types, including 77 suites, 26 one-bedroom and 12two-bedroom accommodations. The Submittal Package includes the following application requests: - A Site Plan approval request for the new project, incorporating the Flexible Development Application requirements for Overnight Accommodations in the Downtown Area. A Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application to allow for additional hotel rooms. Approximately eighty-eight (88) hotel rooms would normally be permissible on the subject property. The applicant is requesting an additional twenty-seven (27) hotel rooms to ensure the economic viability of the proposed facility. I1. Response to General Applicability 1. The subject site lies within the Town Lake Residential District. This District is a diverse urban neighborhood in which the City of Clearwater has recognized significant development potential for residential and commercial uses. The area is immediately adjacent to the Downtown Core District, and as such connections and land uses that will better link the two areas are considered important to the City's redevelopment efforts. The proposed Suites Hotel falls within the height and intensity guidelines established for the District. The surrounding area adjacent to the proposed hotel site, includes several underutilized and vacant parcels. Those parcels that do have structures include several building types and sizes. Immediately to the north of the property is the Town Lake Park, which includes a large lake amenity that is a shared stormwater facility. To the northwest is the Ralph Richards Tower, a seven story building which is operated by the Clearwater Housing Authority to house the elderly and disabled. To the southwest, at the corner of Myrtle Avenue and Chestnut Street is Prospect Towers, aseventeen-story structure that houses retirees. There are also other dense developments along Chestnut Street to the south and Cleveland Street to the north. The site's location along Court Street, a major thoroughfare and recently designated State Road 60, and just to the south of the Town Lake Park, makes it ideal for the proposed development, which is of urban scale and allows for pedestrian friendly connections to the Downtown Core. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Flexible Development Application Submittal Package February 2006 epR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The Clarkson Group -~wntown Clearwater Residence I Surrounding Area Context ~ t t 1'1 ~; ~t'1 ~t ~ 1•y 1 11 ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ rl 1 11 ti ~, ~ 11 1 If tt t; 1 i r11 i 11 It ^1~ i L~~siiii li i ._"~G 2. The Hotel will add value to the adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood as a whole. The proposed hotel is a Marriott Residence Inn, which is a quality mid-level brand that will attract extended stay business travelers working in the Downtown Core, as well as tourists and urban visitors who need to be convenient to the Clearwater Beach and the cultural amenities that the immediate area offers. 3. The proposed development will not endanger the health or safety of persons residing in the area. The Downtown Clearwater Residence Inn will be an attractive and useful addition to the neighborhood, and will help in encouraging continued quality redevelopment of the surrounding area; most particularly in establishing the market for additional hotel projects in the downtown area. 4. The proposed redevelopment of the subject property will result in reduced car trips. Currently the site is home to three small office buildings that typically generate more traffic than overnight accommodations, especially those that are designed for extended stay business travelers. The proposed Court Street pedestrian improvements, as well as the extension of existing sidewalks along Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue will encourage pedestrian trips to surrounding uses as well, will continue to grow in importance and use, as the surrounding area continues to redevelop with a mix of retail, office and residential uses. The proposed development will also reduce and minimize traffic congestion through site design concepts and aland-use change. The existing site is occupied by the Senior Citizens Services within three structures that total approximately 12,000 square feet. Two (2) access driveways on Court Street, one (1) driveway on Ewing Avenue and one (1) driveway on Prospect Avenue serve these facilities. The proposed Residence Inn will reconfigure the site and reduce the total number of access points to two (2) driveways. One access driveway on Ewing Avenue and the primary driveway will be located on Prospect Avenue. ORIGINAL RECEIVED QPR ~ 7 2006 Flexible Development Application Submittal Package PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 2006 CIN OF CLEARV`JATER The Clarkson Group -~wntown Clearwater Residence I~ This land-use change and site access change will assist to reduce congestion by reducing the site generated traffic and the number of access driveways. The proposed use has a more evenly distributed traffic flow. The entering and exiting traffic indicates that there is not a point where all traffic on-site will be exiting or entering during the same time period, thereby, reducing the traffic congestion and conflicts on the local network that is associated with the site-generated traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Medium density residential uses are being developed immediately to the east of the site, and the Town Lake Park, an important public amenity, lies to the north. The site's southern border is Court Street, a major thoroughfare and now designated as S.R. 60. The City's Downtown Plan encourages higher density urban scale commercial and residential development along this key access to downtown and the Gulf beaches. 6. The proposed development will be an upscale, mid-level hotel product, which will attract predominately extended stay business travelers and family tourists. The hotel will not include any retail commercial (e.g. restaurants) uses that could operate late in the evening, avoiding any potential for causing disturbance to the surrounding area. In most ways, this facility will perform much like residential development, with its inhabitants keeping a typical workday schedule, and utilizing the retail, institutional and cultural facilities downtown. I11. Response to Flexibility Criteria for Overnight Accommodations 1. Height N/A 2. All street frontages are designed and used for commercial purposes. The design of the proposed Hotel orients the building towards Court Street, and connects to Court through a pedestrian plaza, which will step down to the expanded pedestrian facilities along the thoroughfare. 3. Off-Street Parking The proposed development will provide adequate on site parking per code (1.0 space per room). 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design guidelines in Division 5 Article 3. SEE RESPONSES BELOW ORIGINAL RECEIVED aPR ~~ zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Flexible Development Application Submittal Package February 2006 The Clarkson Group - ~wntown Clearwater Residence In~ Site Design Block and Lot Characteristics The layout of the proposed Hotel site will not alter the current grid of the surrounding neighborhood. The site design provides strong connections to the surrounding pedestrian network. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking The proposed vehicular use area is heavily landscaped and screened on all sides, from the pedestrian network. Pedestrian use areas are clearly marked, using decorative pavers across vehicular access points. Access to the site will be from the secondary street frontages along Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue, and the parking is located behind the building which allows Court Street to maintain an urban feel. The parking lot will be screened and landscaped to reduce undesirable views for guests and pedestrians alike. Pedestrian Circulation/Access The site is designed to allow maximum pedestrian access to all three of the public rights of way. Along Court Street the sidewalk will be eight (8) feet wide, and five (5) foot sidewalks run the entire length of the property on both Ewing Avenue and Prospect Avenue. In areas where the pedestrian network crosses vehicular access into the site, decorative pavers will be placed to demarcate pedestrian crossing areas. Site Elements Open Space The open space on the site will be concentrated in the front along Court Street. This portion of the property will provide an attractive environment for guests and pedestrians alike. Street furnishing will be provided along Court Street which to allow for pedestrians to enjoy the provided landscaped area. Buffering and Screening There are no specific buffer requirements for the proposed development. However, significant screening has been designed around the vehicular use area to provide an attractive and safe pedestrian environment moving north towards Town Lake Park. On Ewing Avenue, the screening takes the form of a decorative 3' high wall. Along Prospect Avenue, the screening will be provided by a 36" hedge. Landscaping The landscaping proposed for the site is designed to enhance the pedestrian experience along the adjacent rights of way, and add to the aesthetic element of the District, which is taking form as properties redevelop. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 Flexible Development Application Submittal Package PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER The Clarkson Group - ~wntown Clearwater Residence I Fences and Walls The site will be lined with a decorative wall along Ewing Avenue, which will match the materials and color palate used on the building. The existing fence which lines the southern edge of Town Lake Park will remain. Building Placement Location The building is located along the Court Street right of way, a major thoroughfare heading into Downtown, to create an urban feel. Orientation The building is oriented towards the street with the primary entrance located along Court Street. The entrance will connect with the sidewalks along Court Street via a plaza which will sfep down to the sidewalk. Separation The proposed building site is bordered by Ewing Avenue to the east, and Prospect Avenue to the west. It will be more or less centered along the Court Street frontage to create an urban edge. Coverage The building is oriented towards Court Street, which gives an urban feel to the primary street frontage. This edge continues along both of the secondary rights of way through the use of a hedge and a decorative wall. These features create an urban feel around the site, and effectively screen the parking area from pedestrians and passing cars. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Flexible Development Application Submittal Package February 2006 ~' r The Clarkson Group -~wntown Clearwater Residence I~ IV. Description of Proposed Public Amenities The proposed landscape improvements to the site will create a lush setting, will both adequately buffer and screen all vehicle use areas, and create a safe and attractive pedestrian environment for guests and the general public alike. The landscape palate that has been chosen for the site includes the following species: Lorapetalum Live Oak Muhly grass Drake Elm Juniper Medjool Date Palms Viburnum Chinese Fan Palms Hibiscus Bird of Paradise Court Street The site has a significant amount of frontage along Court Street, which provides an excellent opportunity to create an exceptional landscaped environment. The landscape plan and pedestrian environment has been designed to meet the requirements of the Court Street streetscape standards as articulated in the Downtown Design Guidelines. The Hotel building, which is oriented towards the street, will directly link to the pedestrian experience along Court Street, through a plaza with decorative pavers. Linkage to the street will be provided through a single stair leading down from the plaza and onto the sidewalk, accommodating the natural, sloping elevation change occurring on the subject property. The eight (8) foot sidewalk along Court Street will be lined with Medjool Date Palms spaced at 60' intervals. Street lighting will be provided along Court Street at 100' intervals. In addition to the street treatment, there will also be a lushly landscaped area directly to the west of the hotel building. This large landscaped space will include all of the plant material present in the landscape palate. Ewing Avenue The limited right of way on Ewing Avenue presents a constraint to the level of landscaping that can be accomplished. A five (5) foot sidewalk is to be provided along the street frontage, and screening of the vehicle use area from the road will occur with the construction of a decorative wall three (3) feet high which will run along the length of the vehicle use area along the street. This wall will consist of decorative paver bricks, stucco, and a cap that will match the architectural colors and materials. In the northeast corner of the property, the existing oak cluster will remain preserved and following the terminus of the decorative wall, a 36" hedge will border the north edge of the vehicle use area uninterrupted. Prospect Avenue The Prospect Avenue frontage will have a five (5) foot sidewalk, and a 36" hedge, which will shield the vehicular use area from the street. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4PR 0 7 2006 Flexible Development Application Submittal Package PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~~~D~D l/ ~~OC~~ New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering [~,, 'I ~~~~~~a~~ C~~~~~w~~~~ PR®JEC1' NO.: 05211.001.000 CITY OF CLEARVV/o1TER STORi~il~lATER i~IA~ACEf~iE~T NARRATIi/E PREPARED FOR: TW ~ CL~~RI~~®~ C®~~7U~6~i1~~'JY 3100 UNIVERSITY BLVD. SOUTH SUITE 200 .IACK$ONVILLE, FLORIDA 32216 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR p ~ 2006 P~iY OF CLEARWA ERj CI FEBRUARY 15, 2006 Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 wilsonmiller.com 2/13/2006 43322 Ver. Otl• JDOW CMIe3 05211.007-000- • 0 ~u~j! ~~ff ~~~aa°~~it~a° ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~,1~~~~~~~~ for D~~r~~~wu~ C~~~~r~~~~~~ r~~~s~~~c~ o~,~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006- PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIiY OF CLEF,RVJATER PREPARED FOR 3100 UNIVERSITY BLVD. SOUTH SUITE 200 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32216 WM-T-ReF: 05211-001-000 `\ ~= i ~ l ~~~ PROJECT DESIGNER: KEN JERNIGAN OJE EN .: AMID SP,. ,EBKA , P,E. ` ~amidreza Sah~bkar, P.E. DATE: 02-15-06 ~~. #399~~ 2/23200& 43322 Ver. 01!- JDOW caba3 05211-001.000- • 0 r~ u TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NARRATIVE • Introduction and Purpose • Existing Conditions APPENDICES A. Exhibits 1. 2005 Aerial Photo 2. FEMA Flood Zone Map B. Stormwater Calculations • Storm Pipe Calculations • Inlet Calculations • HGL Calculations ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEP.RWATER 223Q008-43322 Ver 011-JDOW CPpG3 05211-001-OOP - 0 • INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The project consists of a proposed hotel and all associated infrastructure. The project is located on Court Street between Prospect Ave. and Ewing Ave., within Section 15, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida. This report is intended to serve as the engineering documentation for the project stormwater management system design in obtaining approvals from the City of Clearwater. An application is being submitted to the City of Clearwater for the approval of this site to use the existing stormwater management system located in the Clearwater Downtown stormwater Service District. EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAINAGE Pre-Development Conditions The site generally slopes from east to west, with a ridgeline running across the site just south of the center of the site. Runoff flows north towards curb and gutter located on the northeastern boundary of the site, and is directed down a drive aisle towards Prospect Avenue, where it enters a closed conduit system. Runoff that heads south from the ridgeline flows toward Court Street where it is intercepted by an existing inlet and enters a closed conduit system. All pipes that receive water from this site outfall into the existing dry pond located just south of the site. The site has some green space, mainly concentrated in the southeast corner of the site, but mainly consists of concrete and asphalt areas. There is no off site runoff entering the project area. Post-Development Conditions The general east to west slope of the site has been maintained. All water flow is conveyed by use of curbs and grading to adequately designed inlets. Water is then conveyed through proposed pipes, which tie into the existing stormwater system. All pipes that receive water from this site again outfall into the existing dry pond located just south of the site. There is no off site runoff entering the project area. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEP.RWATER 2123/2006. 83322 Ver. 011- JDOW Galva 05211.001-000•-0 r: APPENDIX A EXHIBITS ORIGINRL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 P C ~Y OF CLEPaRVJA EI'T ~ ~,, '~aJ Project t3oundary ~ '*' ~ ,,:s~~, h~- ~~'.~, ~~ ~ >r l J{21GINAI #;i ~ ZONE 1- ~ ` ~ _~`~ .~~; ~,~~ ~"` 1 F ~_. XSOO ~ :.~,~ _~ '~ ~= APR ~ 7 2006 ~. i _ ~- ~, , u: . ~ ~ :~ ` ~"" ~ . ~.rr+.. #lANNiNG DEPAKTME ,~ ` ! - ~ ~ C: ttiY OF CLEP,RWI~ ER '~-~s.. ~~, are. :j `. ~ L;_~.. _ ~ t ,.... ' ~ fit' M.- ~.~w, s ~i ~ F~~* , I ~ ,~ t ~ ~ I 5 ~ , '.~ a1 i ` '"DTI' fi, ~ : 1 (`rF. 1 ~'~ 4 t ,~' ~~~~ :~. _ ~ i ,, - t ~... ,,_ r ~ ~ ° - - .~ 'i .. .5~e - t _ ~ a 9~,, ~ T 0.y ate. ~~ ~: ee _ .* ~ i s a. a >. ' ' ''~~ ~~' ' ~. 'i i':!1~ 5ift.. '~ ~~ ~ W ~ - _ i1M'd. ~ ; .'~. ....- M~ ~ .aeraai+!Y~yF ~ , ~~~1 .. - Mr"+~'iii~+-' _ ~• - I ? A. ~, , . ~. ~~`- ,. _~.. ~' i .. - ,L„ . ~: r~ ..~.. ,~,_: r ~, C~ealetl: I~bnOry. Jawary 30, M06 Y.O1:05 PM Lor~ibn: 0lP~a~ec1etl5311 c a a1e1.Mx0e1 05311 Few 031 i6_Ot]006m1a _ ~IsvnMillere New' Dinxfions !n Planning. Design d Fngrncenng ~~I 200 ~- 40~ '~'~`- ~learwater Hotel Feet e FEMA Flood Zones 1 inch equals 200 feet n ~ m ~ ~~'+ ~_ ~~ m N D O O APPENDIX B STORMWATER CALCULATIONS • ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVdATFR 2/23/2006 12:10 PM Pipe Calculations 1 of 1 ,.~. n~,.,..,.,..~e. u,.fe~ om vy To Drainage C C x A Inlet Rain Runoff Invert Elev. Length Slope Dia. Capacity VEL. Flow Remarks pint Point Area Factor Increment Cumm. Time Min. Fall !n/Hr Q C.F.S. Upper End Lower End FT % IN. Q C.F.S. F.P.S. Time MIN. 4 3 0.50 0.85 0.43 0.43 15.00 6.40 2.72 23.15 22.65 91.84 0.544% 15 4.78 4.02 0.38 3 2 0.20 0.85 0.17 0.60 15.32 6.40 3.81 22.65 22.15 99.30 0.504°~6 15 4.60 4.19 0.40 2 1 0.20 0.85 0.17 0.77 15.69 6.40 4.90 22.15 21.60 102.28 0.538°~6 18 7.72 4.63 0.37 .DG 5A 0.35 0.95 0.33 0.33 15.00 6.40 2.13 22.40 22.30 13.77 0.726% 12 3.04 4.19 0.05 iA 5 0.00 0 0.00 0.33 15.04 6.40 2.13 22.25 22.10 17.95 0.836°~ 15 5.92 4.43 0.07 5 1 0.05 0.85 0.04 0.38 15.11 6.40 2.40 22.00 21.60 60.00 0.667% 15 5.29 4.20 0.24 1 EX.1 0.00 0 0.00 1.14 16.00 6.40 7.30 21.60 21.50 15.59 0.641 °~, 18 8.44 5.37 0.05 7 6 0.49 0.85 0.42 0.42 15.00 6.40 2.67 19.25 18.90 62.60 0.559°,6 15 4.84 4.04 0.26 6 EX.2 0.00 0 0.00 0.42 15.25 6.40 2.67 18.80 18.50 56.14 0.534°~ 15 4.73 3.97 0.24 • • aRIGIN,gL RECEIVEp ~'LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY QF CLEgRWgTER 1w5101_.XLS 2!232006 12:10 PM Inlet Computations l oit Pro ect: cleanvarer sorer T W W/~ S Sw/Sx Eo a S'w Se Lt P L/Lt d E h Q dM Ob T INLET Q Q Q S Sx w C ~ ~ D ~ C A ~ T ~ ' ~ n A ~1 m n A A ~ ~ o A " Z cam Z7 A A S n m m =' z X ~ A ~ m A vo', ~ o = y < o A ~ ~ z c~i ~ x n ~ o m o n m n m ~ ~ m -1 ~ ~ b A n m n m c~ 2 TYPE F 0.20 0.85 0.17 0.17 6.40 1.09 0.00 1.09 13 0.09 3 TYPE F 0.20 0.85 0.17 0.17 6.40 1.09 0.00 1.09 13 0.09 4 NPE F 0.50 0.85 0.43 0.43 6.40 2.72 0.00 2.72 13 0.17 5 TYPE F 0.05 0.85 0.04 0.04 6.40 0.27 0.00 0.27 13 0.04 7 TYPE F 0.49 0.85 0.42 0.42 6.40 2.67 0.00 2.67 13 0.17 _ C~ u ORIGINAL RECEIyED ~ ~R 0 ~ 1006 PANNING DEPgRTMENT CITY OF CLE,gRU/ATER 2/23/2006 12:10 PM Hydraulic Grade Line Computation 1 of 1 • C/ t Htl Pao ecf. INLET earwa er UPSTREAM a e Outlet Wafer Do Qo Lo Sfo H/ JUNCTION LOSS 1.3 0.5 FINAL Inlet Water RIM STATION 1 INLET Surface Elev. (2 in 3 cis 4 ft 5 % 6 ft 7 Vo 8 Ho 9 Qi 10 Vi 11 QiVi (12 2 Vi /2g Hi 13 Ang/e 14 Hd 15 Ht 16 Ht 17 Ht 18 H 19 Surface Elev. 20 ELEV. 21 EX.1 Startin Elevation 23.00 1 23.00 16.00 7.30 15.59 0.48 0.07 4.13 0.07 0.04 0.08 0.19 0.00 0.10 0.17 23.17 27.25 2 18.00 4.90 2.77 13.56 0.12 0.04 90.00 0.08 5 15.00 2.40 1.96 4.69 0.06 0.02 90.00 0.04 2 23.17 18.00 4.90 102.28 0.22 0.22 2.77 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.18 0.23 0.11 0.34 23.51 26.16 3 15.00 3.81 3.10 11.82 0.15 73.00 3 23.51 15.00 3.81 99.30 0.35 0.34 3.10 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.15 0.07 0.42 23.92 26.75 4 15.00 2.72 2.22 6.03 0.08 75.00 q 23.92 15.00 2.72 91.84 0.18 0.16 2.22 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.17 24.10 26.26 0 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 23.17 15.00 2.40 60.00 0.14 0.08 1.96 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.12 23.29 26.94 SA 15.OD 2.13 1.73 3.69 0.05 90.00 5A 23.35 15.00 2.13 17.95 0.11 0.02 1.73 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.07 23.42_ 27.25 BLDG 12.00 2.13 2.71 5.77 0.11 45.00 BLDG 23.42 _ 12.00 2.13 13.77 0.35 0.05 2.71 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03. 0.04 _ 0.02 0.07 23.4$ 94.50 0 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 _ EX.2 Startin ~Ievation 19.75 g 19.75 15.00 2.67 56.14 0.17 0.10 2.17 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.14 19.89 23.46 7 15.00 2.67 2.17 5.79 0.07 79.00 ___ 7 20.15 15.00 2.67 62.60 0.17 D.11 2.17 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.12 20.27 23.20 0 2.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 6 pR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CIEARWATER ., ~J DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN PROJECT NO.: 05211.001.000 CITY O~ CLEARWATER TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED FOR: THE CLARKSON COMPANY 39 00 UNIVERSITY BLVD. SOUTH SUITE 200 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 322`16 MARCH 24, 2006 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER T f City of Clearwater TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT for DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN PREPARE® FOR THE CLARKSON C®MPANY 3100 UNIVERSITY BLV®e SOUTH SUITE 200 JACKSONVILLE, FL®RI®A 32216 WM-T_FIEF: 05211 _001 _000 ORIGINRL RECEIVED APR 0 7 Z0~6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV"/ATER C~ Clarkson Site Transportation Analysis Introduction The Clarkson project is a Residence Inn proposed for property located on Court Street between Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue within the City of Clearwater. Project access is proposed with driveways on Prospect Avenue and on Ewing Avenue, see Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by Senior Citizens Services that utilize three (3} general office buildings totaling 12,213 square feet. The purpose of this analysis is to show the potential change in transportation impacts associated with construction of this 115-room Residence Inn replacing the existing general office facilities. Study Area Based upon details obtained during the teleconference for transportation methodology on February 17, 2006, the study area, as shown on Figure 2, will be Court Street from Myrtle Street to Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and Chestnut Street from Myrtle Street to Ewing Avenue. A copy of the Traffic Impact Study Methodology Statement is included in the Appendices for reference. The transportation analysis will be conducted for the PM Peak hour and will include the following intersections. Myrtle Street @ Court Street . Myrtle Street @ Chestnut Street • Court Street @ Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue . Court Street @ Prospect Avenue • Court Street @ Ewing Street • Chestnut Street @ Prospect Avenue Trip Generation Trip Generation for this project was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003, land use designations for the P.M. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Copies of the reference pages from ITE are included in the Appendix. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~ PR ~ `~ 2QQ6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ` O j k I ,1t- ~ a L,a a 100' q 0' P6A ~ I ~ ? __ m6 i' ~~ ® I _ ~1 ~C ~ 9 b A ~~ 6 6 I~ I A ~$ t w S. ~ sexc r-xr ~ ~- ca D IV PT7 ~ I I ` q~,,py~~ _ W C . ~~ c Or- ~~ ~v ~ ~ p' ~ I ~ ~ ~ vuxrc uwulE x f m m ~-~ 6 ~~ ~ _ P I -~ ~ ,, ~ ~ ~°ti~ f .\ ~' ~ "~ I nm sie~uz~XOxmw rew~ iwaa xar2 a ls~uom) ,wo ` \ ~ ~ ~• xuoem uloxo101q wm onm ~Oda4 a. aoax \ ,~ ~' '~ n616uasnn x6 cvmnrrs aiawm a mmuc e - i¢am, : \ ~ _ ~., «,IQ ,a1L IAyM~MO110RM M. Iznaam asim n \\ - mwme m wm gym[ mm~w~a mw~nr mmM oat[ vmrew >4 »J1 ai 6A0 am tawmmt b nm a R1b My 6~w~ aMro) \ \~ I (via o ~~am apt. we. ear. ~ ~~ ~. [wemn b aln,r al ILNO"~ ~mem. (qrO+~ Pn~rO) \ ~ 1 I I (OINAi w NattlK ~IW P ~ml~If \ '~ 6 r n.n b r.~. ,r ndm w... wpm, p~w~+ a„mI ~ '~ nm1M b OA BOeY 1004 Pqp 1 ^ I M NaMf - Xa! NOIIto NgFRQ O ~~ ~,b as B~ ,DWG. PbT Na~aeY t m iv~m.! ~ `•~ ~~. § 1bIC Aa. 16OOIOINO Rfplf)IR9 OFM IO OIE POMIO IIlO0060 W ` \ '\ qg~ • Plldtlb WOMIV, Il011M \ \ \ ..., i .~ I aeeMertmoM I.[ewo sre Iw-mwenon a ~ aMUt Baal Pxmmn rmw zao ro (O40m s*1 ~ 1 ' .' a I b b Q : Balall0 U2 MR \ \ ~~ M ~ P [ME[ Mt0u16 i0atflila 11.OM q M1 ` ` ~ tlr~'I M . M A00 9NS9 flAOa AQb Oh1]I q M1 \ \\ \'•~ ~.~ r: IBS : p~~p f.AR 601 w 6~0~ SUflVEV ~cwa ewaMO xF»M mma \ A~ MFlal Pal[ M MM 000. a/T 16aTm PAOaI¢ Iltt Rwn1 \ ~ . !~ ~ I~ . Ipa10 OtOM 004 0/C A M DOOM Ae~ \..-~~- .Ctl. ~ 10114• WMLMIF IIOIOOMf. P~f W/Ll . IOM Pd{ e/ M0.1! 1104 IOUND OPW FlPE 1/1 AN.MD PNWIR ~ ~~ ~ B a ~ ~ sruroamm n1 ~ ~ m : ; av ~ °m°ta '6.e - °°~ir °PS Mn Ma P raa t~v ~ ~ \ ~ o 156 on 00 ~ 1Mm~6ioAaia~n OOa d - 11AO~m011~ IOTN. /aW0 axw 141•] 9 (OOM N wwey mn) 141 . ~ ~l 1~1~ WPFWIGOIL ON6ME 6Ma 600 \ \ FIGURE 1 ~..,w~..... cuv+n mtiF, THE CLARKSON COMPANY SITE AND 11T11J11ES PLAN ,,,,,.m .,. ~..~eo~.•mro.~m.m~l~a=P+.am•>~.s~+aaw ,,,.,~,... nnumlrnww nceowerco __ Table 1 provides the P.M. peak hour trip generation for the existing land use, Senior Citizens Services. Table 1 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation -Existing Conditions Land Use Size P.M. Peak Hour Tri s Internal Ca tore Passer-by Ca tore Net P.M. Peak Hour Sin le Tennant Office In Out In Out In Out In Out ITE Code #715 3-Buildin s 12,213 sf 8 45 0 0 0 0 8 45 Total 12,213 sf 8 45 0 0 0 0 8 45 1. ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 7`" Edition Table 2 provides the P.M. peak hour trip generation for the proposed land use, Suites Hotel. Table 2 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation -Proposed Conditions Land Use Size P.M. Peak Hour Tri s Internal Ca lure Passer-by Ca lure Net P.M. Peak Hour Suites Hotel In Out In Out In Out In Out ITE Code #311 7-levels 115 Rooms 21 25 0 0 0 0 21 25 Total 115 Rooms 21 25 0 0 0 0 21 25 1. ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 7'" Edition As reflected in the comparison of Table 1 and Table 2, the proposed use of a suites type hotel has a lower trip generation than the single tenant office category that is currently occupying this site. The trips are also more evenly distributed between trips entering and trips exiting the site with the proposed use. Existing Conditions Court Street, at the project site, is a 3-lane one-way roadway westbound beginning at the intersection split with Chestnut Street. Chestnut Street provides the one-way eastbound companion to Court Street. Court Street is apolicy-constrained roadway, by the City of Clearwater, due to previous years having levels of service below the acceptable standard on portions of this roadway. The existing site is occupied by the Senior Citizens Services in three (3) general office buildings. As shown in Tablel the PM peak hour generation for the single tenant office use is 5~~~~I~PLM peak hour trips with 45 trips out bound during that peak period. RECEIVED aPR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF GLF~`RlNATF,R • Roadway machine counts were conducted fora 72-hour (three-day) continuous time period on Court Street and on Chestnut Street at two (2) locations. 72-hour mid-block traffic counts were conducted starting on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 and ending on Thursday, March 2, 2006, for the following roadway segments. • Court St between N Prospect Ave & Ewing Ave • Chestnut St between N Prospect Ave & Ewing Ave The roadway machine counts at each location were averaged together and adjusted using the Peak Season Factor Category Report of 0.99 and the Weekly Axle Factor Category Report of 0.98 from the Florida Department of Transportation's 2004 Florida Traffic Information CD. The 72-hour machine counts, the Pinellas County Peak Season Factor Category Report, and the Weekly Axle Factory Category Report are provided in the Appendix. Peak hour traffic volumes were established by applying the K10° factor of 9.0 to the 2006 AADT traffic volumes for this analysis. Court Street is a one-way westbound roadway and Chestnut Street is one-way eastbound, therefore traffic counts collected on these roadways represent the directional volumes and a D10° factor was not applied. Figure 3 provides the 2006 peak hour directional traffic volumes on Court Street and on Chestnut Street using these factors and the adjusted daily traffic counts. In addition to the 72-hour machine counts, turning movement counts were conducted on the PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak. hours at the following intersections. Myrtle Street @ Court Street Myrtle Street @ Chestnut Street Court Street @ Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue • Court Street @ Prospect Avenue Court Street @ Ewing Street Chestnut Street @ Prospect Avenue Different traffic devices control these intersections. The signalized intersection is: Court Street at Martin Luther King, Jr Avenue; the following are stop controlled intersections: Court Street at Prospect Ave, Chestnut Street at Prospect Ave, and Court Street at Ewing Ave; and the intersections of Court Street at Myrtle Ave and Chestnut Street at Myrtle are currently under construction that when completed will provide a signalized facility at each location. The stop- controlled intersections are 2-way stops for the cross-streets. Court Street and Chestnut Street are free-flow in the westbound and eastbound directions respectively. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • As noted in Table 3, the intersections of Court Street at Prospect Avenue and Chestnut Street at Prospect Avenue were analyzed as 2-way stop-controlled, with free-flow traffic on Court Street and on Chestnut Street. As a result of this control device the north and south movements on Prospect Avenue operate at less than the acceptable level of service. To improve the levels of service for these movements it will require signalizing both intersections. However, signalizing will also reduce the efficiency of eastbound and westbound traffic flow and the level of service on Court Street and Chestnut Street. A signal warrant study will be necessary for each intersection prior to any upgrade. The percentage of turning movements for the PM turning movement counts was applied to the PM peak traffic volumes and Figure 3 provides the 2006 PM peak hour traffic conditions based upon the PM peak hour turning movement counts. Copies of the PM peak hour turning movement counts are provided in the Appendix. An analysis of these intersections on Court Street and on Chestnut Street was conducted using HCS for the PM peak hour. Table 3 provides the results of the HCS intersection analysis for the PM peak hour for the year 2006. The PM peak hour HCS analysis used the traffic volumes from Figure 3. As indicated all analyzed intersections operate at acceptable levels of service. Copies of the HCS analysis summary sheets are provided in the Appendix. Table 3 Existing P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2006 LOS Court St @ M rtle St B Court St @ S. Pros ect Ave A Court St @ Ewin Ave B Court St @ Martin Luther Kin , Jr. Ave C Chestnut St @ M rtle St B Chestnut St @ S. Pros ect Ave A Note: 1. Level of Service reflects the through traffic on Court and/or Chestnut Streets, the cross streets may be deficient with control delays. 2. Existing intersection under construction, 2006. The intersections of Court Street at Myrtle Avenue and Chestnut Street at Myrtle Avenue were under construction for intersection upgrades. It is assumed that the EB and WB through movements on the respective streets will operate at acceptable levels of service and that completion of construction at these intersections will aid the turning movements and the cross street movements through the intersections. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR p 7 200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEA,RWATER tp N~o I~ L~ 72 O°°'"~' A ~0 ~I y _~~2 ~~ ~-0 0 ~ -y.- ~r 69 1424 -~- o 0'°~ DIY NNO N 20~ O~ti COURT ST. & MYRTLE ST. yESTNUT ST. & 5. PROSPECT AVE. °`~'~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~o0 6 I I I ~J J1, I~ ~-- ~ ~ ~ ~ -~- ~ 07 59 ~ 1425 -~ ~Tr 22 1491 -~- r ~ ~ I 29 ~ o~~ o ~ °°° CHESTNUT ST. & MYRTLE ST COURT ST. & SWING AVE. ~~ uvcu NCO APR 0'7 2006 i ~ I 3NIN DEPARTMENT .'~1 I~ Y OF CLEARWATER 0 0 -~- 0 46 ~-- 1220 47 ~tf ~~o ~I N L~ 30 I I I ~- /108 ~,,.JI Jt, Ih ~ n5 85 1375 59 NNo~ COURT ST. & S. PROSPECT AVE COURT ST. & MLK JR. AVE. F / GURU 3 COCIf~ T A ~ ~o N~o ~ 76 0~ i ~0 -~- 1275 Ut ~ '` p 42 0 p ~ r91 74 p ~~ ~ 1511-~- 0 ~ NCO 21 ~ O~~ N COURT ST. & MYRTLE ST. HESTNUT ST. & S. PROSPECT AVE. o~~ ~ ~ p _o \ ~. o 0 ~ 6 f121 F ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~~87 62 ~ r91 -5/2 --~- 24 t15J 1581 -~- ~ ~ r 3/ ~ O~N N 0 ~ 000 ORIGINAL CHESTNUT ST. & MYRTLE ST COURT ST. & SWING AVE. A IAN NG DEPARTMENT :' ~ ~ CITY F CI.EARVJATER N ~ O ~ 49 °' ~ N ~ 32 I ~ ~ 1294 u~ ~ ~ ~ ~- In6 rr2~ I ~ 50 l86 ~J 0~ ~~ r p ~,- U51 1453 -~ ~ ~ I ~~r p~ Sao 62 ~ NPv'o N N Qt COURT ST. & S. PROSPECT avE COURT ST. & MLK JR. aVE. T F l~C/f~E ~ C®UR Build-out Year Conditions (2008) • In order to obtain build-out year background traffic volumes, the year 2006 average annual PM peak hour traffic volumes were increased by three (3) percent per year for two (2) years. City of Clearwater staff provided this growth rate. Figure 4 provides the 2008 build-out year PM peak hour volumes. Table 4 provides the 2008 build-out year intersection analysis using HCS, including project traffic from this proposed application. As indicated all analyzed intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. Table 4 2008 P:IUI. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions. Intersection 2008 LOS Required Improvement LOS After Improvement Court St @ M rtle St B N/A N/A Court St @ S. Prospect Ave A Si nalize N/A Court St @ Ewin Ave C N/A N/A Court St @ Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave D N/A N/A Chestnut St @ M rtle St 6 N/A N/A Chestnut St @ S. Pros ect Ave A Si nalize N/A Note: 1. Level of Service reflects the through traffic on Court and/or Chestnut Streets, the cross streets may be deficient with control delays. 2. Existing intersection under construction, 2006. As under the existing conditions analysis the intersections of Court Street at Myrtle Avenue and Chestnut Street at Myrtle Avenue were analyzed with through traffic on Court Street and Chestnut Street as free flow due to construction. It is assumed that the EB and WB through movements on these streets will operate at acceptable levels of service and that completion of construction at these intersections will aid the turning movements and the cross street movements through the intersections. Conclusions The transportation analysis was submitted to show the transportation impacts associated with redeveloping this site from a 3-building, 12,213 sq. ft. single tenant office facility to a 115-room suite hotel. As reflected in the data previously discussed redevelopment of this site as proposed would reduce the traffic impacts associated with the new use. As indicated in this analysis, Court Street and Chestnut Street operate at an acceptable level of service through each of the intersections in the study area and will continue to maintain the levels of service through the build-out year 2008. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF C'l.~~p~n~ATER APPENDIX ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV'/ATER Traffic Impact Study Methodology Statement Purpose: The purpose of this Methodology Statement is to confirm the traffic study details agreed to during the teleconference of February 17, 2006. The participants of the teleconference were Bennett Elbo, City of Clearwater, Traffic Operations Division; Michael English, Evan Johnson and Jeff Stevens of WilsonMiller, Inc. The study area will be Court Street from Myrtle Street to Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and Chestnut Street from Myrtle Street to Ewing Avenue. This segment lies within the portion of Court Street that the City has designated as a Constrained Facility. Within the study area the following intersections will be included in the traffic analysis. Signalized Intersections • Myrtle St @ Court St • Myrtle St @ Chestnut St • Court St @ Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave Unsignalized Intersections • Court St @ Prospect Ave • Court St @ Ewing Ave • Chestnut St. @ Prospect Ave ® Prospect Ave @ Project driveway All intersections and roadway segments identified above will be analyzed for level of service for existing conditions and buildout year conditions. It was agreed that the percentage of trucks to be used would be 2%. The growth factor that will be applied to traffic count data to determine the future buildout year volumes would be 3% growth per year. All analysis will be conducted for the PM Peak Hour and will be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The analysis will also incorporate the data calculated for internal trip capture as specified in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. Three (3) copies of the TIS report and one (1) copy of the HCS analysis, on CD, will be submitted upon completion to the City of Clearwater. ORIGINAL RECEIVED a ~R o ~ zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ?J17/200E 43171 Ver: 011-JSTEVENS GFX0.9 ~J • ORIGINAL RECEIVED X111 Suites I~®tel APR 0'7 2006 \~~ ~ ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Average Vehicle Trip Eriada ~vs: ~®®ons ®rt a: 1Neekday, peak H®ur o$ s4djacent Street Traffic, ®ne H®ur Setw-eea~ 4 ao~ci 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 5 Average Number of Rooms: 216 Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting Trip Generati®rt per ~®®~a Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.40 0.32 - 0.47 0.63 ®ata pi®t arl~i ~ 120 110 ' c W Q H m U .C d m m Q 100 90 80 70 60 a;aunon -use careiu--y - ;~mau aampee arze X X . /~~ ---X~ ---- - ,- -- ----- ---- ~ -~ - -- --- - ---- ---- 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 X =Number of Rooms X l4ctual®ata Points - - - - - - Average Rate 50 Fitted Curve Equation: iVot given ~2 = e:xw Trip Generation, 7th Edition 578 Institute of Transportation Engineers . • Single ~'enant ®ffice ~uildirog (715) ORIGINAL Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area RECEIVED ®n ae Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour aPR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Number of Studies: 42 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 164 ~` ~E Directional Distribution: 15% entering, 85% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.73 0.79 - 5.14 1.49 ®ata s~AOt ana~ 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 c 800 W Q .~ N 700 U .C 600 ~ 500 N Q ~i 400 H 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 x = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area 500 600 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve '-"-' Average Rate Fitted Ctaive Equatf®n: T=1.52(x) + 34.88 R2 = 0.'78 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1179 Institute of Transportation Engineers a38d b6'0 = d~OlAi xaam uosEas xead sa~-pu[ ,~;~„ :a~oN Oi'I £0'i b00Z/I£/Zi - b00Z/9Z/Zi £S Ii'i b0'I b00Z/SZ/ZI -b00Z/6I/Zi ZS ZI'i SO`I b00Z/Si/ZI - b00Z/ZI/Zi IS iI'I b0'I b00Z/Ii/ZI -b00Z/SO/ZI OS I I' I b0' I b00Z/b0/Zi - b00Z/SZ/I i 6b i I' I b0' I b00Z/LZ/I i- b00Z/iZ/i i 8b Ii'i b0'I b00Z/OZ/ii-b00Z/bi/it Lb OI' i £0' I b00Z/£I/I i - b00Z/LO/I i 9b 60' i ZO' I b00Z/90/I i - b00Z/I £/OI Sb ~31y~~b3l~ ~~ kid 60'i ' ZO'i ' bOOZ/0£/oi - b00Z/bZ/Oi bb 1N3Wl~dd34 9NINNdId LO T i 0 I b00Z/£Z/0I - b00Z/L I /0 i £b LO'I IO'i b00Z/9i/OI-b00Z/Oi/Oi Zb 9~OZ ~u ~dd Oi'I £0'I b00Z/60/OI - b00Z/£0/OI Ib £i't 9o't b00Z/ZO/OI - b00Z/9Z/60 ob CI3N3a321 9I'i 60't b00Z/SZ/60 - b00Z/6I/60 6£ ~y~1~9Ri0 8I'i I I'i b00Z/8I/60 - b00Z/Zi/60 8£ LI'i OT'I b00Z/I I/60 - b00Z/SO/60 L£ SI' I 80' I b00Z/b0/60 - b00Z/6Z/80 9£ bi' I LO' I b00Z/8Z/80 - b00Z/ZZ/80 S£ ZI'i SO'i b00Z/iZ/80 - b00Z/Si/80 b£ I I'i b0'i b00Z/bI/80 - b00Z/80/80 ££ OI' i £0' i b00Z/L0/80 - b00Z/i0/80 Z£ 60' i ZO' i b00Z/I £/LO - b00Z/SZ/LO i £ LO' i i0' i b00Z/bZ/LO - b00Z/8I/LO 0£ 90'i 00'I b00Z/Li/LO-b00Z/ii/LO 6Z 90' i 00' I b00Z/0 i/LO - b00Z/b0/LO 8Z 90' t 00' I b00Z/£0/LO - b00Z/LZ/90 LZ 90' I 00' I b00Z/9Z/90 - b00Z/OZ/90 9Z 90' I 00' i b00Z/6I/90 - b00Z/£ i/90 SZ SO'i 66'0 b00Z/Zi/90 - b00Z/90/90 bZ SO't 66'0 b00Z/SO/90 - b00Z/0£/SO £Z SO'i 66'0 b00Z/6Z/SO - b00Z/£Z/SO ZZ b0't 86'0 b00Z/ZZ/SO - b00Z/9i/SO IZ b0'i 86'0 b00Z/Si/SO-b00Z/60/SO OZ £0' i L6'0 b00Z/80/SO - b00Z/ZO/SO 6i ZO'I 96'0 b00Z/IO/SO - b00Z/SZ/b0 8i TO'T S6'0 b00Z/bZ/b0 - b00Z/8I/b0 LI ~ 00'I b6'0 b00Z/LI/b0-b00Z/it/b0 9i :~ 66'0 £6'0 b00Z/Oi1b0 - ~b00Z/b0/b0 Si ~: 66'0 £6'0 b00Z/£0/b0 - b00Z/8Z/£0 bI 86'0 Z6'0 b00Z/LZ/£0 - b00Z/IZ/£0 £i :~ L6'0 I6'0 b00Z/OZ/£0 - b00Z/bi/£0 Zi 86'0 Z6'0 b00Z/£i/£0 - b00Z/LO/£0 I i 66'0 £6'0 b00Z/90/£0 - b00Z/6Z/ZO Oi ~: 00' I b6'0 b00Z/8Z/ZO - b00Z/ZZ/ZO 6 :~ IO'I S6'0 b00Z/IZ/ZO - b00Z/SI/ZO 8 £0' i L6'0 b00Z/bI/ZO - b00Z/80/ZO L b0' I 86'0 b00Z/LO/ZO - b00Z/I~0lZO 9 90'i 00'I b00Z/I£/i0 - b00Z/SZ/i0 S 60'i ZO'I b00Z/bZ/IO - b00Z/8I/IO b Oi'I £0'i b00Z/LI/IO - b00Z/II/i0 £ iI'I b0'I b00Z/Oi/TO-b00Z/b0/IO Z ZI'i SO'I b00Z/£0/IO-b00Z/IO/i0 I 3~Sd 3S ~;EQ ~i~M OOSi :,C.io~a;e;~ ~~AAA.L1~IIlOp S~'Y'I~1~tId ~odag.sao~a;e~ ~o;ae3 uoseaS dead b00Z • ao~p sotisA~s uoi;eyrodsuEis d d • uotieuo suelZ3o ~uatuuE aQupuoi3 900Z/£0/~L~I ~a1E(I a~Td Print Date: March 03, 2006 . Florida Department of Transportation • Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Weekly Axle Factor Category Report Countys 15 -- PINELLAS Categ+orye 1537 SR60, CLRWTR BCH-19A Week Dates ACF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 0.99 2 01/04/2004 - 01/10/2004 0.99 3 01/11/2004 - 01/17/2004 0.99 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 0.99 5 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 0.99 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.99 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.99 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.99 9 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 0.99 10 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.99 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.99 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.99 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.99 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.99 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.99 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.99 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.99 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 0.99 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 0.99 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 0.99 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 0.99 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 0.99 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 0.99 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 0.99 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 0.99 26 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 0.99 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 0.99 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 0.99 29 07/11/2004 - 07/17/2004 0.99 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 0:99 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 0.99 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 0.99 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 0.99 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004 0.99 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 0.99 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 0.99 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 0.99 38 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 0.99 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 0.99 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 0.99 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 0.99 42 10/10/2004 - 10/16/2004 0.99 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 0.99 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 0.99 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 0.99 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 0.99 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 0.99 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 0.99 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 0.99 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 0.99 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 0.99 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 0.99 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 0.99 Page: 37 Print Date: March 03, 2006 ~ Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Weekly Axle Factor Category P2e~ort County: 15 =- PIN)LLAS Category: 1513 SR60, LTS19A = iIS19 Week Dates ACF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 0.97 2 01/04/2004 - 01/10/2004 0.97 3 01/11/2004 - 01/17/2004 0.97 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 0.97 5 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 0.97 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.97 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.97 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.97 9 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 0.97 10 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.97 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.97 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.97 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.97 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.97 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.97 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.97 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.97 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 0.97 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 0.97 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 0.97 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 0.97 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 0.97 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 0.97 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 0.97 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 0.97 26 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 0.97 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 0.97 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 0.97 29 07/11/2004 - 07/17/2004 0.97 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 0.97 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 0.97 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 0.97 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 0.97 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004- 0.97 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 0.97 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 0.97 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 0.97 38 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 0.97 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 0.97 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 0.97 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 0.97 42 10/10/2004 - 10/16/2004 0.97 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 0.97 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 0.97 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 0.97 ORIGINAL 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 0.97 RECEIVED 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 0.97 066 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 0.97 2 ApR ~ ~ 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 0.97 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 0.97 NNING DEPARTMENT p- p 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 0.97 . , CITY OF CLEARWATER 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 0.97 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 0.97 Page: 13 STATE OFFLORIDA DEPARTMEM' OF TRANSPORTATION CONDITION DIAGRAM FORM 750-020.04 TR.4FFlCENGINEERING 1699 LOCATION 1 D: ~ ~ ~ ~ ©S ec V C: ~! ~~l ~~! 0.~G''I~ 1 I Y~ e ~ I a S Y COUNTY: : CIT / 1©rl C ~Gt (~C' S'~ ~ ~ ~ V DRAWN BY: DATE: I ~ ~ ~ ~ plC e ~~ ,oZ.sm~}~ I ~ _ - - -~-- - - - - ~-- _ - - - _ ~ s~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 ~. ApR ~ 71006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEP,RV/ATER . .~ TREES -'~'- POWER POLE ~' SIGN (1 POST) OQ SHRUBS ~® TELEPHONE POLE ~ SIGN (2 POSTS) HEDGE ~ COMBINATION POLE ~~ OVERHEAD SIGN ,!/!I ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE ~ BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD ~( HYDRANT PED. SIGNAL HEAD ~~x- RIGHT OF WAY LINE ~L FENCE ~ CONTROLLER CABINET ~ PED. PUSHBUTTON r ~ ~ GUARDRAIL C ~ ~ VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP ~S RR SIGNAL (WIGATE) RECYCLED PAPER • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION CONDITION DIAGRAM FORM 750-020-04 TRAFFlCENGINEERING 10199 LOCATION ID: CDVf Sf~ ~ e ve. Pine 1~ a S G~ea ~w ~L~"e~' couNTY: crrY: DRAWN BY: /1©rl Cf l' ~t~~ S~' DATE: ~~J ~0 I ~ ! ~OVC'~" S''' ®/'tX6~tI2 ~V2 ~G~de~ CanSfrvt~ion) / . ~N fl~ 0 -~ o ~. ~~qqr ~ O V ~~ L ~~. . ~rL,~~ ~ ~ / O ii Q o 0 ~~ ~ Coc.r^~ Sf - - ~ W ~/ 000 ~ -- I'aS~,P~ 1 ~ - - - - - - - _- ~ ~ ~, o ~~ p ORIGINAL c ° f- RECEIVED 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ APR 0'7 2006 ~ ~ 's U ~ 0 ~ p{p,NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Ej J .:.:..r:~.. - ......... _ .. ..... y..:.... - - - ~ _ - :J 2 •. - - .. TREES ~'~ POWER POLE ~' SIGN (1 POST) ~~- SHRUBS °-°~~ TELEPHONE POLE ~ SIGN (2 POSTS) HEDGE ~~ COMBINATION POLE ~~ OVERHEAD SIGN ~f/~/ BUILDING ^ TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE ~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD ~- RIGHT OF WAY LINE HYDRANT PED. SIGNAL HEAD -~~~- FENCE ~ CONTROLLER CABINET ~ PED. PUSHBUTTON ~ ~ ~ GUARDRAIL C ~ ~ VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP ~-~ RR SIGNAL (W/GATE) RECYCLED PAPER r 11' , • • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONDITION DIAGRAM FORM 750-02P04 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 1N99 LOCATION 1D: C eS /I S ® JJ ('T ~ ~ Pi Y12 ~ ~ a S ~~@arwa~~~' couNTY: cmr: DRAWN BY: ' l ©~ ~~~~~ s~ DATE: ~ ~°~ ~® N ~` ~ hes~Fn~ f Sf ~ rely rtl ~. ~~e ~~nde~ ca~,s-~,~~~o„) ~N ° ~ 9 _o ~. o; 9 s C° ~ ~ _ ~ j `~C~e n~f S~-'~ ~ o I;l CheSfnv~ Sf'' -~ `3o,~P6'' ~~- - -~ - - - - ~ ~ E-~_. - - - ~ - ~ ~ ~, T ORIGINAL oK-y RECEIVED I_ r QPR ~ 7 200 lr7 ~~~~ ` ' l ~ a PLANNING DEPART ~ ~ CITY OF CLEARW o _ ...; .. ~. .. .. •.:; ., .. - ~'-S1(IVIBOLS - - TREES POWER POLE ~' SIGN (1 POST) Q~A- SHRUBS ~~ TELEPHONE. POLE ~ SIGN~(2 POSTS) HEDGE ~ COMBINATION POLE ~"~ OVERHEAD SIGN ~~ld/ ® BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE ~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD ~' ~ ~ ~° RIGHT OF WAY LINE LJ, HYDRANT PED. SIGNAL HEAD ~+~~ FENCE ~ CONTROLLER CABINET ~ PED. PUSHBUTTON ~ ~ ~ GUARDRAIL ~ ®~ VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP ~ T RR SIGNAL (W/GATE) TENT fER RECYCIEDPAPER • • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION FORM 750-020-04 CONDITION DIAGRAM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 1099 LOCATION ID: /- C L°.S' !1 U S-t- ~ ~(~ S C,C v~, Pi to e ~ ~ a S G ~ea rw ~ ~"e~' couNTY: . c(TY: ~~t (~(° S'~ / 1©n l ~ ~ ~ r DRAWN BY: ~ DATE: N'~ Ches+~~t S~I- ~ Prospec~- /~1~ . ~N - ~ ~ n ~ + _~ a i ~, = dQ1S C e5fpu~- S C~ieS7~qu S~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °'~. ~ e3 rl.j~MQ~I I~ - ~ --- _ ~ ___. ORIGINAL ~ RECEIVED sR~P Q PR ~ 7 200 ~- PLANNING DEPART CITY OF CLEARW - . :t, .. ,_. .- ..:~. ....,~.. - - '3' ~~== - r - ti Sl!IIABOL - - _ >' t TREES ~° POWER POLE ~ SIGN (1 POST) ~d4 SHRUBS ~°°- TELEPHONE POLE ~ SIGN (2 POSTS) HEDGE ~ COMBINATION POLE ~~ OVERHEAD SIGN f~l~0 ® BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE ~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD - ~ ~ RIGHT OF WAY LINE HYDRANT PED. SIGNAL HEAD -~~- FENCE ® CONTROLLER CABINET ~ PED. PUSHBUTTON ~ ~ ~ GUARDRAIL C ~ ] VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP ~~~ RR SIGNAL (W/GATE) JIENT .TER RECYCIEDPAPER . , • • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONDITION ®tAGRAM FORM 750-02604 TRAFFlCENGINEERING 16'99 LOCATION 1D: C4V~t` .S C~j25 ~i v ~ ~Gv I ~~ I Y~ e ~ ~ A J 1 ~A (-W Ca~(°'I t COUNTY: t ~ CITY: DRAWN BY: / 1©rl C~Gt {~C S"~ DATE: I ,, ~ ; ~a ~ a ~ '~'` sr „ ~s ~ ~ . ~ ~~ . ,, coy ` s `'ms '' ' ... ~ ~ - - `~o~, asp/ .. ORIGINAL ~ RECEIVED - - - - --~ ~ PR ~ 7 20Q ~ .~OMPI,'' _ _ -' ~~ PLANNING DEPART IIC S'~nvf S~-" -~ CITY OF CLEARWA :, ;> ... ....~ _ TREES ~® POWER POLE F SIGN (1 POST) ~a4 SHRUBS ~"° TELEPHONE POLE ~ SIGN (2 POSTS) HEDGE COMBINATION POLE ~"-~ OVERHEAD. SIGN ,`~~~ ® BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE ~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD HYDRANT PED. SIGNAL HEAD -~- RIGHT OF WAY LINE FENCE ~ CONTROLLER CABINET ~ PED. PUSHBUTTON r ~ ~ GUARDRAIL C ®] VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP ~~ RR SIGNAL (W/GATE) ENT ER RECYCLEDPAPFR ^ ! • s STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONDITION DIAGF:AM FORM )50.026-04 TRAFFlCENGINEERING 1N99 LOCATION I D: /~,.~/y//~~ / ' / L ~ • _ ~! ; ~ © C O ~ ~ S COUNTY: p ~+ i" i Yl e P ~ A S cn~Y: __c~]~a ~w c~~"e~' !1©~1 CitGt('C' S~ ~~~ VO b DRAWN BY: DATE: (~ T /j1. L. X. ~' Avg ® G'ou r~" S-T ~N ~~ s ~ y ~ 'Corr sr'' ~V ~ E-6' '"coif-+' sr', r~sm~j~ " ~ ~ ' ~` n3SmP ~ . r ~° -r-7~- ~` ~ r~i ~ ~_ ~/ o i _ _ _ 3°~F -~ ~ ORIGINAL ~ RECEIVED ~ ~~ ' 7 2006 APR ~ v PLANNING DEPARTM :.~ CITY OF CLEARWAT ~ s 0 _M ~.~ .... a: '. .[ T _ Fes- ~~.:':' . ~ .: .. • - ~ .... .. eS . > t TREES ~- POWER POLE ~° SIGN (1 POST) ~b4 SHRUBS ~- TELEPHONE POLE ~ SIGN~(2 POSTS) HEDGE COMBINATION POLE ®"-'~ OVERHEAD SIGN ~///~ ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE BUILDING ~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL HEAD ~ HYDRANT ~°"~ PED. SIGNAL HEAD ~~~ -}~-~° RIGHT OF WAY LINE FENCE ~ CONTROLLER CABINET ~ PED. PUSHBUTTON ~ ~ ~ GUARDRAIL C ®~ VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP ~--~ RR SIGNAL (1N/GATE) RECYCLED PAPER ., Counted by : Richie Weather :warm /dry Board # :1323 ! • BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 C~rnuns Printed- ALL VEHICLES File Name :Myrtle@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/1/2006 Page No : 1 MYRTLE COURT ST MYRTLE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 43 4 47 3 219 17 239 6 68 0 74 0 0 0 0 360 16:15 0 34 8 42 3 190 15 208 5 45 0 50 0 0 0 0 300 16:30 0 46 7 53 7 206 9 222 5 60 0 65 0 0 0 0 340 16:45 0 40 10 50 14 206 8 228 3 51 0 54 0 0 0 0 332 Total 0 163 29 192 27 821 49 897 19 224 0 243 0 0 0 0 1332 17:00 0 38 8 46 10 164 20 194 4 61 0 65 0 0 0 0 305 17:15 0 40 6 46 14 161 14 189 2 72 0 74 0 0 0 0 309 17:30 0 35 6 41 14 158 17 189 4 64 0 68 0 0 0 0 298 17:45 0 32 6 38 13 156 15 184 2 40 0 42 0 0 0 0 264 Total 0 145 26 171 51 639 66 756 12 237 0 249 0 0 0 0 1176 Grand Total 0 308 55 363 78 1460 115 1653 31 461 0 492 0 0 0 0 2508 Apprch % 0.0 84.8 15.2 I 4.7 88.3 7.0 6.3 93.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Total % 0.0 12.3 2.2 14.5 3.1 58.2 4.6 65.9 1.2 18.4 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MYRTLE COURT ST MYRTLE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total PeaK Hour From 7(i:UU to 7 i:45 - reaK ~ of ~ By 16:30 16:00 16:45 16:00 Approach Volume 0 164 31 195 27 821 49 897 13 248 0 261 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 84.1 15.9 3.0 91.5 5.5 5.0 95.0 0.0 - - - High Int. 16:30 16:00 17:15 - Volume 0 46 7 53 3 219 17 239 2 72 0 74 - - - - Peak Factor 0.920 0.938 0.882 - Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEA:RWATER ., Counted by : Richie Weather :warm /dry Board # :1323 BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 (;rnnnc Printari_ TRI ICKS R Rt1SFS-PFI~S File Name :Myrtle@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/1/2006 Page No : 1 MYRTLE COURT ST MYRTLE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 16:15 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16:30 D 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 Total 0 4 0 1 ~ 0 11 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 17:45 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 2 0 2 0 7 0 6 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 6 Grand Total 0 6 0 3 0 18 3 7 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 10 Apprch % 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 64.3 10.7 25.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Total % 0.0 10.7 0.0 5.4 0.0 32.1 5.4 12.5 0.0 10.7 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 MYRTLE COURT ST MYRTLE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped ApP• Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total teak dour rrom ~e:uu to ~ i:4o - reak _i or B 16:00 h Approa Volume 0 4 0 1 5 Percent 0 8 ~ 0 0.0 2 . High Int. 16:00 Volume 0 1 0 1 2 Peak 0.62 Factor 5 _~ 16:45 0 8 2 6 16 0 0 50. 12. 37. . 0 5 5 17:30 0 4 0 3 7 0.57 i 1 17:00 0 2 0 3 5 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 . . 0 17:30 0 0 0 3 3 0.41 7 17:00 0 0 0 6 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:45 0 0 0 4 4 0.37 5 3 6 11 8 28 56 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR p'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ( T Counted by : Richie Weather :warm /dry Board # :1323 ~BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. • 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 Grouns Printed- l)-TURNS-BIKES File Name :Myrtle@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/1/2006 Page No : 1 MYRTLE COURT ST MYRTLE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:15 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 1 1 17:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ( 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 2 Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 5 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 MYRTLE COURT ST MYRTLE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Time u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total Peak Nour From 16:00 to 17:45 - PeaK 1 of o 16:45 Approa h Volume 0 0 0 1 1 Percent 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 . . . .0 High Int. 17:30 Volume 0 0 0 1 1 Peak 0.25 Factor 0 1 16:00 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 16:15 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 16:00 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 16:15 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 16:45 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:15 0 0 0 1 1 0.50 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Int. Total I ' [ BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET Counted by : Richie TAMPA, FL 33602 File Name :Prospect@Court Weather :warm /dry Site Code :00000000 Board # :1323 Start Date :2/28/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- AI I VFHI(:I FC PROSPECT COURT ST PROSPECT Southbound ~ Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 26 8 34 0 227 12 239 7 35 0 42 0 0 0 0 315 16:15 0 25 6 31 2 168 7 177 4 45 0 49 0 0 0 0 257 16:30 0 22 5 27 5 208 5 218 1 37 0 38 0 0 0 0 283 16:45 0 17 3 20 8 191 5 204 5 45 0 50 0 0 0 0 274 Total 0 90 22 112 15 794 29 838 17 162 0 179 0 0 0 0 1129 17:00 0 23 9 32 11 206 11 228 4 56 0 60 0 0 0 0 320 17:15 0 21 1 22 7 193 9 209 6 90 0 96 0 0 0 0 327 17:30 0 26 6 32 5 143 9 157 3 64 0 67 0 0 0 0 256 17:45 0 17 5 22 3 183 6 192 11 29 0 40 0 0 0 0 254 Total 0 87 21 108 26 725 35 786 24 239 0 263 0 0 0 0 1157 Grand Total 0 177 43 220 41 1519 64 1624 41 401 0 442 0 0 0 0 2286 Apprch % 0.0 80.5 19.5 2.5 93.5 3.9 9.3 90.7 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 7.7 1.9 9.6 1.8 66.4 2.8 71.0 1.8 17.5 0.0 1 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROSPECT COURT ST PROSPECT Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right T l t Left Thru Right To a Left Thru Right Or.wL Vw... C-~ .~ AC.n n ~~ A7. AG A. .1, A .L A o a l t Total I con I IVUI I I VI11 I V.VV lV 1 / .YV - 1'CGI~ 1 VI I By 16:00 Approach 16:30 16:45 16:00 Volume 0 90 22 112 31 798 30 859 18 255 0 273 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 80.4 19.6 3.6 92.9 3.5 6.6 93.4 0.0 - - - High Int. 16:00 17:00 17:15 - Volume 0 26 8 34 11 206 11 228 6 90 0 96 - - - - Peak Factor 0.824 0.942 0.711 - Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A ~ a Counted by : Richie Weather :Warm /dry Board # :1323 •AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. • 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAIViPA, FL 33602 File Name :Prospect@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :2/28/2006 Page No : 1 r;rnunc Printed- TRl1CKS & RUSFS-PFf~S PROSPECT COURT ST PROSPECT Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Righ4 Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Total 0 0 2 0 0 5 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 Grand Total 0 0 3 0 0 16 2 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 O 27 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 _ 0.0 84.2 10.5 5.3 60.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 1 1.1 0.0 0.0 59.3 7.4 3.7 1 1.1 0.0 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROSPECT COURT ST PROSPECT Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total reaic hour rrom ie:uu to ~ i:45 -reaK -i or B 16:45 Approa h Volume 0 0 2 0 2 Percent 0 0 0.0 100 0.0 . High Int. 17:15 Volume 0 0 1 0 1 Peak 0.50 Factor 0 16:00 0 11 0 0 11 0.0 100 0.0 0.0 16:30 0 5 0 0 5 0.55 0 16:30 2 0 1 1 4 50. 0.0 25. 25. 0 0 0 16:30 1 0 0 0 1 1.00 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER , ~~ Counted by : Richie Weather :warm /dry Board # :1323 ~BAYSiDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 Groups Printed- U-TURNS-BIKES File Name :Prospect@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :2/28/2006 Page No : 1 PROSPECT COURT ST PROSPECT Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 17:00 0 0 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0~ 2 0 I 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI 1 Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 Grand Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 PROSPECT COURT ST PROSPECT Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Time u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total redK nuur rrurn rv:uu to r rwv - rear< r or B 16:15 Approa h Volume 0 0 0 2 2 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 High Int. 16:15 Volume 0 0 0 1 1 Peak 0.50 Factor 0 x16:00 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 16:00 0 0 0 2 2 0.25 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:30 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APB 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEFrRWATER ~. Counted by :Ron Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 • BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 C;rnnnc Prin+orl_ Di 1 \/FI-II(`I FC • File Name :Myrtle@Chestnut Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/1/2006 Page No : 1 MYRTLE AVE MYRTLE AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbouhd Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 13 24 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 58 35 93 19 268 6 293 423 16:15 16:30 16:45 13 10 8 32 0 44 0 36 0 45 54 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 19 46 36 45 21 50 82 66 12 17 8 281 2 299 9 313 3 295 325 324 390 461 434 Total 44 136 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 180 111 291 56 1161 20 1237 1708 17:00 15 41 0 56 0 0 0 17:15 12 41 0 53 0 0 0 17:30 10 42 0 52 0 0 0 17:45 10 35 0 45 0 0 0 Total 47 159 0 206 0 0 0 Grand Total 91 295 0 386 0 0 0 Apprch % 23.6 76.4 0.0 ( 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 2.6 8.4 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 56 42 98 14 330 5 349 503 0 0 55 25 80 13 323 9 345 478 0 0 51 22 73 10 294 6 310 435 0 0 28 18 46 8 295 3 306 397 0 0 190 107 297 45 1242 23 1310 1813 O 0 370 218 588 101 2403 43 2547 3521 I 0.0 62.9 37.1 1 4.0 94.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 10.5 6.2 16.7 2.9 68.2 1.2 72.3 MYRTLE AVE MYRTLE AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right T tal Left Thru Right Left Thru Right r~__~. u_.._ r o Total Total --....__.13y Approach ..16:30 ..... ...... ........... 16:00 Volume 45 162 0 207 0 0 0 Percent 21.7 78.3 0.0 - - - High Int. 17:00 - Volume 15 41 0 56 - - - Peak Factor 0.924 16:30 16:30 0 0 202 124 326 52 1265 26 1343 0.0 62.0 38.0 3.9 94.2 1.9 17:00 17:00 - 0 56 42 98 14 330 5 349 - 0.832 0.962 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR fl7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Counted by :Ron Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 C~rnuns Printed- TRUCKS & BUSES-PEDS File Name :Myrtle@Chestnut Site Code :00000000 Start Date :311/2006 Page No : 1 MYRTLE AVE MYRTLE AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds. Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 4 0 2 12 16:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 8 16:30 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 0 10 16:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6 Total 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 3 15 0 2 36 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 17:30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 17:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 0 0 Total 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 7 0 20 0 0 Grand Total 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 3 2 14 3 35 0 2 Apprch % 37.5 25.0 0.0 ( 37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 15.8 10.5 I 73.7 7.5 87.5 0.0 5.0 Total % 4.3 2.9 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 4.3 2.9 20.3 4.3 50.7 0.0 2.9 MYRTLE AVE MYRTLE AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total reaK Hour rrom ~b:uu to ~ r.4a - reaK i or B 16:00 Approa h Volume 2 1 0 3 6 Percent 3 3 16. 0'0 5 0 High Int. 16:30 Volume 0 1 0 2 3 Peak 0.50 Factor 0 '16:45 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:15 0 0 0 1 1 0.50 0 16:00 0 1 2 7 10 0 0 10. 20. 70. . 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 1 4 5 0.50 0 16:00 3 15 0 2 20 15. 75. 0.0 10. 0 0 0 16:00 1 4 0 2 7 0.71 4 9 8 6 69 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR (17 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Counted by :Ron Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 BAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 Grouos Printed- U-TURNS-BIKES File Name :Myrtle@Chestnut Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/1/2006 Page No : 1 MYRTLE AVE MYRTLE AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left °Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:15 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 8 Grand Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 O 11 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MYRTLE AVE MYRTLE AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Time u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total reaK Hour rrvrn iv.uu w ~ r.~+v - reaK i yr B 16:30 h Approa Volume 0 0 0 1 1 Percent 0.0 0.0 0 100 0 . .0 High Int. 17:15 Volume 0 0 0 1 1 Peak 0.25 Factor 0 '16:30 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:15 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 17:00 0 0 0 6 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:30 0 0 0 2 2 0.75 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLp,NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET Counted by :Ron TAMPA, FL 33602 File Name :Prospect@Chestnut Weather :warm /dry Site Code :00000000 Board # :1321 Start Date :2/28/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- ALL VEHICL FS PROSPECT AVE PROSPECT AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right To al Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right t Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 7 18 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 22 8 30 13 333 6 352 407 16:15 10 19 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 23 8 31 25 356 6 387 447 16:30 6 19 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 29 12 334 3 349 403 16:45 10 15 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 35 17 353 4 374 434 Total 33 71 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 98 27 125 67 1376 19 1462 1691 17:00 7 23 0 30 0' 0 0 17:15 10 22 0 32 0 0 0 17:30 9 24 0 33 0 0 0 17:45 10 11 0 21 0 0 0 Grand Total 69 151 0 220 I 0 0 0 Apprch % 31.4 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 2.0 4.4 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 47 18 65 20 267 7 314 409 0 0 34 25 59 50 344 8 402 493 0 0 50 19 69 17 295 5 317 419 0 0 22 14 36 17 309 3 329 386 0 0 153 76 229 104 1235 23 1362 1707 O 0 251 103 354 171 2611 42 2824 3398 I 0.0 70.9 29.1 1 6.1 92.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 7.4 3.0 10.4 5.0 76.8 1.2 83.1 PROSPECT AVE Southbound Westbound PROSPECT AVE Northbound CHESTNUT ST Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Toted Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total rea~c nvur rrvm io:w to I /:4O - YeBK i or i By Approach 16:45 16:00 17:00 16:00 Volume 36 84 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 153 76 229 67 1376 19 1462 Percent 30.0 70.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 66.8 33.2 4.6 94.1 1.3 High Int. 17:30 - 17:30 16:15 Volume 9 24 0 33 - - - - 0 50 19 69 25 356 6 387 Peak Factor 0.909 - 0.830 0.944 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED A P~ 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Counted by :Ron Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 Groups Printed- TRUCKS & BUSES-PEDS File Name :Prospect@Chestnut Site Code :00000000 Start Date :2/28/2006 Page No : 1 PROSPECT AVE PROSPECT AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 6 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 6 .16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 8 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 19 0 2 27 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 3 0 15 0 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 7 1 34 0 5- Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 20.0 10.0 I 70.0 2.5 85.0 0.0 12.5 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 3.7 1.9 1 3.0 1.9 63.0 0.0 9.3 PROSPECT AVE PROSPECT AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total PeaK Hour From 16:00 to 17:45 -Peak 1 of ApproaBh 16:00 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Percent - - - - High Int. - Voiume - - - - - Peak _ Factor 1 16:45 0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:30 0 0 0 2 2 0.37 5 16:45 0 1 1 5 7 0 0 14. 14. 71. . 3 3 4 17:30 0 0 0 3 3 0.58 3 16:00 1 19 0 2 22 4.5 8 4 0.0 9.1 16:00 0 6 0 0 6 0.91 7 6 6 11 4 27 54 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED aPR n ~ 2oos pIp,NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Counted by :Ron Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 File Name :Prospect@Chestnut Site Code :00000000 Start Date :2/28/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- U-Tl1RNS-BIKES PROSPECT AVE PROSPECT AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes lnt. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 17:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 PROSPECT AVE PROSPECT AVE CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Time u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total reaK Hour rrom ~ti:uu to ~ i:45 - reaK ~ or B 16:30 Approa h Volume 0 0 0 3 3 Percent 0 0 0.0 0.0 100 . .0 High Int. 17:15 Volume 0 0 0 2 2 Peak 0.37 Factor 5 16:00 0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 16:00 0 0 0 2 2 0.37 5 16:00 0 0 0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 16:45 0 0 0 3 3 0.33 3 16:45 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:00 0 0 0 1 1 0.50 0 2 2 1 1 6 13 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APt~ 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. • 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET Counted by : Richie TAMPA, FL 33602 File Name :Ewing@Court&Chestnut Weather :warm /dry Site Code :00000000 Board # :1323 Start Date :3/2/2006 Page No : 1 r~rnuns Printari- AI I VEHICLES EWING AVE COURT ST CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound _ Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 3 3 0 261 2 263 0 0 0 0 3 347 0 350 616 16:15 0 0 2 2 0 236 1 237 0 0 0 0 1 332 0 333 572 16:30 0 0 2 2 0 216 1 217 0 0 0 0 8 367 0 375 594 16:45 0 0 1 1 0 234 0 234 0 0 0 0 4 342 0 346 581 Total 0 0 8 8 0 947 4 951 0 0 0 0 16 1388 0 1404 2363 17:00 0 0 1 1 0 206 1 207 0 0 0 0 4 406 0 410 618 17:15 0 0 3 3 0 189 1 190 0 0 0 0 6 355 0 361 554 17:30 0 0 2 2 0 195 0 195 0 0 0 0 2 318 0 320 517 17:45 0 0 2 2 0 190 2 192 0 0 0 0 7 324 0 331 525 Total 0 0 8 8 0 780 4 784 0 0 0 0 19 1403 0 1422 2214 Grand Total 0 0 16 16 0 1727 8 1735 0 0 0 0 35 2791 0 2826 4577 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 99.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 98.8 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 37.7 0.2 37.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 61.0 0.0 61.7 EWING AVE COURT ST CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total PeaK dour From 16:UU to 1 ~:45 - YeaK l OT 7 fay 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:30 Approach Volume 0 0 8 8 0 947 4 951 0 0 0 0 22 1470 0 1492 0 0.0 10 p Percent 0 0.0 99.6 0.4 - - - 1.5 98.5 0.0 . High Int. 16:00 16:00 17:00 Volume 0 0 3 3 0 261 2 263 - - - - 4 406 0 410 Peak Factor 0.667 0.904 - 0.910 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVJATER Counted by : Richie Weather :warm /dry Board # :1323 aAYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. . 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 File Name :Ewing@Court~Chestnut Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/2/2006 Page No : 1 C;rnunc Printad- TRl1CKS R RUSES-PEDS EWING AVE COURT ST CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 16 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 8 16:30 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 2 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 0 0 37 17:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 D 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 Total 0 0 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 22 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 4 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 42 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 EWING AVE COURT ST CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Thr Rig Ped App. L ft Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time Left u ht s Total e u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Total t'eaK Hour rrom ~b:uu ro -i i:vo - reaK i or By 16:15 Approach Volume 0 0 0 3 3 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 High Int. 16:30 Volume 0 0 0 2 2 Peak 0.37 Factor 5 '16:00 0 13 0 0 13 0.0 1000 0.0 0.0 16:00 0 7 0 0 7 0.46 4 17:00 0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 .0 17:45 0 0 0 2 2 0.37 5 17:00 0 22 0 0 22 0.0 1000 0.0 0.0 17:45 0 7 0 0 7 0.78 6 11 7 9 11 75 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR p 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. • 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET Counted by : Richie TAMPA, FL 33602 File Name :Ewing@Court&Chestnut Weather :warm /dry Site Code :00000000 Board # :1323 Start Date :3/2/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Ll-TURNS-t31KES EWING AVE COURT ST CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 9 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:45 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10 0 0 0 25 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 5 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 17:45 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 6 Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 19 Grand Total 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 17 20 0 0 O 44 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.6 45.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 EWING AVE COURT ST CHESTNUT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Time u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total PeaK hour rrom ~ 6:W to ~ 7:45 - F'eaK ~ of ~ By 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:45 Approach Volume 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 11 0 0 0 11 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 10p - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . High Int. 16:00 - 16:00 16:45 Volume 0 0 0 2 2 - - - - - 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 4 Peak 0.50 0.68 0.68 Factor 0 _ 8 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV`JATER Int. Total ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET Counted by :Ron TAMPA, FL 33602 Weather :Warm /dry Board # :1321 (~rnuns Printed-ALL VFHICI FS File Name : MLK@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/2/2006 Page No : 1 M L K JR AVE COURT ST M L K JR AVE COURT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 4 31 4 39 38 245 8 291 9 50 20 79 13 326 9 348 757 16:15 7 43 5 55 26 215 6 247 7 54 28 89 10 293 15 318 709 16:30 4 41 0 45 44 212 7 263 4 42 28 74 15 344 11 370 752 16:45 5 36 3 44 33 221 3 257 7 55 20 82 20 294 14 328 711 Total 20 151 12 183 141 893 24 1058 27 201 96 324 58 1257 49 1364 2929 17:00 6 38 8 17:15 12 39 9 17:30 7 25 2 17:45 5 32 2 Grand Total 50 285 33 Apprch % 13.6 77.4 9.0 Total % 0.9 4.9 0.6 52 29 181 8 218 11 60 29 100 30 376 19 425 795 60 60 173 4 237 3 74 21 98 17 312 13 342 737 34 44 181 8 233 8 47 32 87 10 305 6 321 675 39 36 177 7 220 8 61 20 89 10 306 12 328 676 185 169 712 27 908 30 242 102 374 67 1299 50 1416 2883 368 310 1605 51 1966 57 443 198 698 125 2556 99 2780 5812 15.8 81.6 2.6 1 8.2 63.5 28.4 1 4.5 91.9 3.6 1 6.3 5.3 27.6 0.9 33.8 1.0 7.6 3.4 12.0 2.2 44.0 1.7 47.8 M L K JR AVE Southbound COURT ST Westbound M L K JR AVE Northbound COURT ST Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total rcaR nuu~ twin iv.uv io i r.4~ - rear ~ or i By Approach 16:30 16:00 17:00 16:30 Volume 27 154 20 201 141 893 24 1058 30 242 102 374 82 1326 57 1465 Percent 13.4 76.6 10.0 13.3 84.4 2.3 8.0 64.7 27.3 5.6 90.5 3.9 High Int. 17:15 16:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 12 39 9 60 38 245 8 291 11 60 29 100 30 376 19 425 Peak Factor 0.838 0.909 0.935 0.862 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEp,RWATER Int. Total Counted by :Ron Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET TAMPA, FL 33602 Groups Printed- TRUCKS & BUSES-PEDS File Name : MLK@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/2/2006 Page No : 1 M L K JR AVE COURT ST M L K JR AVE COURT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 16 16:15 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 11 16:30 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 16:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 12 Total 1 5 0 0 1 9 0 2 4 0 0 1 1 14 2 6 46 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 1 1 17:15 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 17:45 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 5 1 1 Total 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 3 5 1 1 3 0 20 3 4 Grand Total 1 5 1 1 3 13 0 5 9 1 1 4 1 34 5 10 Apprch % 12.5 62.5 12.5 I 12.5 14.3 61.9 0.0 I 23.8 60.0 6.7 6.7 26.7 2.0 68.0 10.0 20.0 Total % 1.1 5.3 1.1 1.1 3.2 13.8 0.0 5.3 9.6 1.1 1.1 4.3 1.1 36.2 5.3 10.6 M L K JR AVE COURT ST M L K JR AVE COURT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time u ht s Total u ht s Total u ht s Totaf u ht s Total Neale hour rrom ~ti:uu to ~ i:45 - reaK ~ of B 16:00 Approa h Volume 1 5 0 0 6 Percent 16. 8 3 0.0 0.0 High Int. 16:15 Volume 0 2 0 0 Z Peak 0.75 Factor 0 i 16:00 1 9 0 2 12 8 3 7 ~ 0 1 0 . . 7 16:00 0 5 0 1 6 0.50 0. 17:00 5 1 1 3 10 50. 10. 10. 30. 0 0 0 0 17:45 2 0 1 2 5 0.50 0 16:45 0 17 3 8 28 0.0 60. 10. 28. 7 7 6 17:30 0 8 0 2 10 0.70 0 10 9 14 15 48 94 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4pR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEP,RVJATER ~AYSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. • 1105 EAST TWIGGS STREET Counted by :Ron TAMPA, FL 33602 Weather :warm /dry Board # :1321 Gmuns Printed- lJ-TL)RNS-RIKFS File Name : MLK@Court Site Code :00000000 Start Date :3/2/2006 Page No : 1 M L K JR AVE COURT ST M L K JR AVE COURT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Left Thru Right Bikes Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 16:45 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 9 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 17:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 17:45 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 M L K JR AVE COURT ST M L K JR AVE COURT ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Left Thr Rig Bik App. Time u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total u ht es Total reaK Hour rrom io:vu to i r:4a - reaK ~ or _i By Approach 16:30 16:00 16:00 17:00 Volume 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 - - - - 0.0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 . 0 . . . 0 . High Int. 16:45 - 16:00 17:15 Volume 0 0 0 3 3 - - - - - 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 Peak 0.50 0.37 0.75 Factor 0 5 0 2 3 2 3 10 19 Int. Total ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ 7 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVUATER Hgency i~anic.~ay~iuG cnyuiGCii~iy • ~ty:Clearwater • ounty: Pinellas • Start Date/Time:28-02-2006 00:00 End Date/Time:01-03-2006 00:00 Site ID:41012 Station Num:227062 Descr'iption:Chestnut St btw Prospect Ave & Court St split i-02-2006 Lane 1 East nd Time 00 > 36E 01 22 02 03 7 4 04 05 7= 29 06 71 07 08 136E 209 09 10 240' 213 11 238 29` 17' 16' 6 15E 37 70j 161E 238 231 232 263 > _.__ _ 22 L.___ , 10j ~ _ 11; _ .-_ - _____5 ___ ___26 ___.. ___._ 35 ^__ _. 89 f --~ 199; 214 __ ___ 224, __ 228 T_ __ 272_ 12 ~ 11I ~ -7E _ 14 ___ _ 18~_ 42 __ 111 181 f _, 225 _~ _ 236j 259 .~ 248 ___ _ rTotal __ 99~ _._ ____ 60 _ 41{ 29 66E 143 341{ 677; 886 931j 932 1021 nd Time 12 i 279! 13 287' 14 15 255; 283 16 17 352: 352 18 258 19 20 199 121 21 22 127E 103 23 75 _`_ i _294! 258, __ 282 294 _ 294E 318E .306 332 _ 352' __3_69 _ 398. 333 ___ 181 __ 190 ___ 203 _ 137 __ 118 97 ^ 126! _69~ 88 _70 51 ___5_5 _ _ 52 0 268 319; 344 389: 281 218 126! 86 93' 56 37 rTotal 1081 { 1131' 1186! 1265 1462 1364 847 665 422 415 317 218 ~ Hour Total : __ _15599{ I :. M Peak Hour Be ins : 10:45 AM Peak Volume : 1032 AM Peak Hour Factor : __ __0.95 M Peak Hour Be ins : 16:30 PM Peak Volume : 1508 PM Peak Hour Factor : 0.95 ORIGINAL RECEIVED pR n 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV`/ATER 'rinted on 03-Mar-06 at 14:05 Compact 15 Minute Volume Page 1 of 1 Hgency Name:rsayslae tnglneenng ,ity: Clearwater ;ounty:Pinetlas • Start Date/Time:01-03-2006 00:00 End Date/Time:02-03-2006 00:00 03-2006 ILane 1 (Eastl Site ID:41012 Station Num227062 Description:Chestnut St btw Prospect Ave & Court St split :nd Time 00 5 01 38 23! 02 03 17+ 7 04 05 8! 32 06 77i 07 08 147j 197 09 10 222j 250 11 259 D 32j 1~ _ 10~_ 8 15! 34 80! 1871 184 _237' 229 273 5 34 16 ~ 41 __ ___4 ___ _ 18; _ ^ 39 89j 198 _260 _,__ ____2271_.___ _213 __ __ 270 10 __ 22 _ 191 ___ ___ _ ___ __. __ 5 i ___ ___ _ 13 _ _ _ 23 41 101 I ~ 217 219 ~ 218 ~ _ 227 i _ 255 a.r Total 126' 76 36j 32 641 146 347; 749 860 904; 919 1057 nd Tirne 12 5 13 256; 285 14 15 301 328 16 17 315 431 18 2621 19 20 232 153 21 22 1271 118 23 87 t0 _ '5 D 267; 254: 257 ~ 256 304 280 ___ - 286 295; 300 -326 339 313 _ 309; 365 _V_ 371! 312 ---f------ ~ 326 i 294 236 217 --~---~ 239 _ 1 _ 181; ___ 144! ^ 142 ~ 147 118 105 _ 135 _ _ 100 --~----- 76 98 80 -- 61 __ - A_ 66 63 u 58 irTotal 1034! 1125 1182; 1306 1321 1402 954 699( 523 438 357 274 !4 Hour Total : 15931 ~ j _ _ I i _ .M Peak Hour Be ins : __ 10:45 AM Peak Volume : __ 1029 AM Peak Hour Factor : _ 0.94 'M Peak Hour Begins : _ _ 16:30 PM Peak Volume : 1493 PM Peak Hour Factor : 0.87 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV'JATER Tinted on 03-Mar-06 at 14:06 Compact 15 Minute Volume Page 1 of 1 r~tjciwy wai~~c.uayaiuc ~.~iyuiccin~y ity:Clearwater . ;ounty:Pinellas • Start Date/Time:02-03-2006 00:00 End Date/Time:03-03-2006 00:00 Site ID:41012 Station Num:227062 Description:Chestnut St btw Prospect Ave & Court St split 2-03-2006 Lane 1 East :nd Time 00 5 38; 01 26' 02 03 211 S 04 05 8 20 06 69' 07 143; 08 176 09 10 1931 229 11 258 30! 0 15' 10 9 12 33 55~ 181 ~ 201 274: 241 271 _ 5 _.- 22` 10 _ 21 it Total 111 12 - 10 ~ 63~ _181 -- 6 ___ 11 __ 9 ~ 601 29 ___?3f______-._32 ____ _ 15~_ 41 58? ~ 126 ~_.._89 __ 114 327 _--.__._..188` 198 ~ 710 ._-.---209 ~ 208 794 234:_--234 211; 248 912E 952 ^ 281 ____ 256_ 1066 nd Time 12 5 276, 13 303 14 15 276; 357 16 17 333' 374 18 216 19 2181 20 140 21 22 131; 120 23 91 t0 __ 282 __ 315' 282! 305 323' 330 217 209 L___161 92 106 70 ',5 252 264 ~ 48 3 3121 381 348 268 182 ~ 146 88 66 . 54 0 290 270 _ ____ 348T 304 _ _ _ ___ 347 283 __ ___ 260 ____ 148 __ 122 ___ __ 106__- 80 _ __ ~ 51 it Total 1100 1152 1 12181 1314 1384: 1335 961 757 569 4171 372 266 !4 Hour Total : 16053 _ I I 1 _.____ 1M Peak Hour Be ins : _ 10:45 AM Peak Volume : 1058 ~ AM Peak Hour Factor : _ 0.94 ~ 'M Peak Hour Begins : 16:30 PM Peak Volume : 1432 PM Peak Hour Factor : 0.94 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Printed on 03-Mar-06 at 14:06 Compact 15 Minute Volume Page 1 of 1 City:Clcarwater County:Pinellas • agency ivame:csaysiae cngineertng f~ Site I D:21003 Station Num:227061 Description:Court St btw Prospect Ave & Ewing Ave Start Date/Time:28-02-2006 00:00 End Date/Time:01-03-2006 00:00 ZS-VZ-ZW6 pane ~ west End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 20' 13 ~ 71 5 7' 17 65 151; 214 194 222 275 30 _ 13 4 , 7T__ 5 _ 71 29 99 ~ 184; 223 171 206 252 45 _11 ~ 3 ~ 5 12 9''< 34 1_60 ___ _ __ 230 ` 258 ~ 228 ~ 240 265 00 18 10 6i 5 17 50 180 258! 253 233' 243 249 - r-- - ------ ---- _ - - ___ _ ___._ ~- ___ _ - _ Hr Total 62~ 30 25! 27 40~ 130 5041 823; 948 826i 911 1041 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 263' 267 234E 269 195: 210 188' 1741 113 98s 76 46 _ 30 304 ~ 250 ~ - _____243 249 196 i 193 189 i 137 105 97 ~ 60 48 45 2581 268 ' _ 221; ___ 255 __ 209: 168 1711 115 91 76' _ 60 25 DO 288 234 237 227 208' 187 185' 114 113 861 45 28 Hr Total 1113 1019: 935 1000 8081 758 733 5401 422 357 241 147 24 Hour Total : __ 13440 ; _____ , ~ AM Peak Hour Be ins : 10:45 AM Peak Volume : _ 1035 AM Peak Hour Factor : 0.94 PM Peak Hour Be ins : 12:15 PM Peak Volume : 1117 PM Peak Hour Factor :. p.g2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ 7 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV/ATER 'tinted on 03-Mar-06 at 13:51 Compact 15 Minute Volume Page 1 of 1 rrgericy ivame.~ayswe cngineenng City:Clearwater ~ounty:Pinellas ~ ~ Start Date/Time:01-03-2006 00:00 End Date/Time:02-03-2006 00:00 Site ID:21003 Station Num:227061 Description:Court St btw Prospect Ave & Ewing Ave D1-03-2006 Lane 1 (West) End Time 00 15 T01 29! 02 16f 03 5' S 04 05 71 25 06 68 07 159 08 1 230 09 10 176 225 11 248 30 15i 15` 9 7 3i 19 117( 178 ' 223 201' 210 268 45 _ 171 --~1 8! _~~__. 3! __._-~-._..__. 13 ~ .__._ ___. __ 11i___ ___40 129 __._ 243, ___ _ 246 __ _ 220;____._ ..__249 260_ )0 ___ 201 6i , ~_ 3 ___ __10;____ _54 ' _____ _161! _ 2591 _ 282 210____ _ 255 _ 271 Hr Total 81 ! 45! 20 28 31 ! 138 475 839 981 8071 939 1047 End Time 12 t5 13 263! 14 2921 15 282' 253 16 17 223 188 18 187 19 154 20 103 21 22 86! 84 23 41 30 _ 279 _ ~269f_^ _ 250;____ __258. _...._..._ ._.202!._ _191 _ _199 1501 121 8 5! 81 29 35 _ 291_ 245 218! __ 249 __ 225! ___...Y.~~. _. 192 ~___.- ~___. , 180 _ ___ _ _ _~ 131 ___ _~~__- 112 ._~~ _ __ _._. - .-~_~_ _ 87~ __ 68 ___ _ __ ~ __ ___ 33 JO 307' 247 269! 230 2141 172 177 120' 95 851 61 29 irTotai 1140! 1053] 1019! 990 864! 743 _ _ 743 555! 431 343 294 132 24 Hour Total : 137381 I 4M Peak Hour Be ins : 10:45 AM Peak Volume : 1031 AM Peak H our Factor : 0.91 ?M Peak Hour Be ins : 12:15 PM Peak Volume : 1169 PM Peak Hour Factor : ___ _ 0.95 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV'JATER Tinted on 03-Mar-06 at 13:58 Compact 15 Minute Volume Page 1 of 1 r~yc~~..y ~san~c.uayo~uc uiyniccu~iy :ity:Glearwater :ounty:Pinellas ~ ~ Start Date/Time:02-03-2006 00:00 End Date/Time:03-03-2006 00:00 Site ID:21003 Station Num:227061 Description:Court St btw Prospect Ave & Ewing Ave ~2-03-2006 Lane 1 (West) :nd Time 00 01 5 30j 11 02 10i 03 3 04 05 6 18 06 55~ 07 163; 08 222 09 10 199: 240 11 272 •0 24j 14 6' _ 9 _ 8` 25 106 178 210 194; 220 264 •5 22j 10':. 7± 5 12 39 156 216 _ 251 216: 258 247 ~0 _`_ 17; 18 i ___ 3 ~_~ 10 __`___ 15 __ 53 •__163 ___2691 ____269 206: 26 3 285 it Total 93' 531 261 27 41 135 480 826 952 ___^ _ _ __ _ 815; 981 _ ___ 1068 :nd Time 12 13 5 274! 2721 14 269; 15 254 16 17 224: 198 18 169 19 198' 20 99 21 22 114; 102 23 42 .0 2_63' 278i~ . _,__ `_ 227 _ ____ 257 ____232 ~ _ 197 241 145 f 106 111 ~ 76 51 •5 311 i 2821 °0 303' 271 _2451 209f _ _ 249 ~ 258 ______2_34: __ 193 209~ ^192 __ _ __ 191 164 _ _ 141 { 130 __ __ T~_ 142 1 ~ 111 _ _____ _ _ _T ___ __87 ~ 78 97~ 50 ___•__ _ _ 49_ ~ 25 irTotal 1151] 1103 950. 1018 899: 780 765 614 458 4091 306 167 ;4 Hour Total : _ _ 14117, _~ I I 1M Peak Hour Be ins : - 10:30 AM Peak Volume : 1057 AM Peak H our Factor : _ ~~0.93 'M Peak Hour Be ins : 12:30 PM Peak Volume : 1164 PM Peak Hour Factor : 0.94 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR ~ 7 200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'rinted on 03-Mar-06 at 13:54 Compact 15 Minute Volume Page 1 of 1 HCS2000: Uns~nalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • Analyst: JJS Agency/Co.: WilsonMiller Date Performed: 3/7/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Chestnut St/Prospect Ave Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: East/West Street: Chestnut Street North/South Street: N. Prospect Ave Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) _ ____Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 L T R ~ L T 145 72 35 80 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 154 76 37 85 2 2 2 2 0 0 No / 1 0 0 1 TR LT Volume 69 1424 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 73 .1514 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 1 Configuration L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (o) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95°s queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0.25 6 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service __ _ EB WB Northbound SouthboundY 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L I TR I LT 73 230 122 1623 125 0 0.04 1.84 0.14 17.93 7.3 466.9 A F F 466.9 F RECEIVED A pR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER HCS2000: Unsi nalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO~AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • Analyst: JJS Agency/Co.: WilsonMiller Date Performed: 3/7/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Chestnut St/Prospect Ave Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: East/West Street: Chestnut Street North/South Street: N. Prospect Ave Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 __ ___ __Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments____ __ Major Street Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement 83 1511 21 0.94 0.94 0.94 88 1607 22 2 -- -- -- Undivided / No 1 2 1 L T R No No Northbound Southbound 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration 154 76 52 85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 163 80 55 90 2 2 2 2 0 0 No / 1 0 0 1 TR LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ TR ~ LT ~ v( vp h) 8 8 2 4 3 14 5 ORIGINAL C (m) (vph) 1623 106 o RECEIVED v/c 0.05 2.29 95% queue length 0.17 21.39 Q~~ O~ 206 Control Delay 7.3 675.6 LOS A F F PLANNING DEPARTMENT Approach Delay 675.6 CITY OF CLEARWATER Approach LOS F HCS2000: Un~nalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: JJS Agency/ Co .: Wi 1 sonMi 11 er ORIGINAL Date Performed: 3/7/2006 RECEIVED Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Court St/Ewing Ave ~P~ O'~2~~6 Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater Units : U. S . Customary PLANNING DEPARTMENT Analysis Year: 2006 CITY OFCLEARV`JRTER Project ID: East/West Street: Court Street North/South Street: Ewing Ave Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 22 1491 1307 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 1638 1436 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 0 0 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 1 Configuration L T R _______-____ - Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service_____ Approach EB WB No rthbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L -- ~ L -- T ------ ~ - - R v ( vph ) 2 4 ~ 0 - 7 - C (m) (vph) 466 16 10 370 v/c 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.06 Control Delay 13.1 230.0 365.0 14.9 LOS B F F B Approach Delay 14.9 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO~AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • Analyst : JJS ORIGINAL Agency/Co.: WilsonMiller RECEIVED Date Performed: 3/7/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak QPR ~~ 206 Intersection: Court St/Ewing Ave Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT Units : U. S . Customary CITY OF CLEARVJATER Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: East/West Street: Court Street North/South Street: Ewing Ave Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 _ _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments__ __ __ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 24 1596 1387 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 1753 1524 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 17 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 Configuration R _ _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service__ _ ~ Y Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config - -- L ~ -- ---- ~ R v (vph) -- 26 ---- - - -- 18 C(m) (vph) 426 342 v/c 0.06 0.05 95o queue length 0.19 0.17 Control Delay 14.0 16.1 LOS B C Approach Delay 16.1 Approach LOS C HC52000: Uns' nalized Intersections Release 4.1d • TWOAY STOP CONTROL SUMMAR Y ORIGINAL Analyst : JJS RECEIVED Agency/Co.: WilsonMiller Date Performed: 3/7/2006 APR 0'7 2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Court St/Prospect Ave Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT Units: U. S. Customary CITY OFCLEARWATER Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: East/West Street: Court Street North/South Street: N. Prospect Ave Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments __~___Y~_ __ _ __ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R --- - --- ----- ---------- - - ---- ---- ---- - Volume 47 1220 46 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 1297 48 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channe 1 i z eci? No Lanes 1 2 1 Configuration L T R Upstream Signal? No No Y Minor Street Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R -- --- - ------ ---------- - -- -- -- Volume 16 227 80 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 241 85 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level --- ----- of Service ----------------- Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ LT ~ TR ~ v (vph) 50 258 106 C{m) (vph) 1623 129 159 v/c 0.03 2.00 0.67 95% queue length 0.10 20.78 3.81 Control Delay 7.3 533.1 64.1 LOS A F F Approach Delay 533.1 64.1 Approach LOS F F H~S2uuu: unsignalizea 1nLersecLions xelease 4.1a TW~AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • Analyst: JJS Agency/Co.: WilsonMiller Date Performed: 3/7/2006 ORIGINAL Analysis Time Period: PM Peak RECEIVED Intersection: Court St/Prospect Ave Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater AP~ ~~ 206 Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Project ID : CITY OF CLEARWATER East/West Street: Court Street North/South Street: N. Prospect Ave Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 _ __`Y___ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ___ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 49 1304 49 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 1387 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 1 Configuration L T R Upstream Signal? No No - -- -- - Minor Street: Approach - ---- ---- Northbound ----- - Southbound --------- Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 17 250 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 265 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 0 1 Configuration LT Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 100 21 0.94 0.94 106 22 2 2 0 / No 1 0 TR / Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service_ ___ EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L ~ LT ( TR 52 283 128 1623 106 137 0.03 2.67 0.93 0.10 26.18 6.39 7.3 841.2 122.6 A F F 841.2 122.6 F F HCS2000: alized Intersections Release 4.1e Si ORIGINAE ~ ~ RECENED Analyst: JJS yrtle Inter.: Court / Agency: WilsonMiller Area Type: CBD or Similar APR ~ ~ ~~~6 Date: 3/6/2006 Jurisd: Clearwater Period: PM Peak Year 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Project ID: Clearwater Residence Inn CITY OF CLEARWATER E/W St: Court Stree"t N/S St: Myrtle Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ ___ _ ___ _ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Sou thbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 4 0 ~ 0 1 0 ~ ~ 0 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ LTR ~ LT ~ TR Volume ~ I40 1202 72 ~12 221 ~ 146 28 Lane Width ( ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ( 0 I ~ 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 8 Yellow 3 All Red 3 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound ~+ Westbound LTR 4121 6030 0.35 0.68 8.2 Northbound LT 354 1634 0.73 0.22 56.3 Southbound TR 355 1640 0.54 0.22 47.6 Intersection Delay = 18.7 (sec/veh) Area Type: CBD or Similar __ Signal Operations~ _ ~ ____ 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 NB Left P Thru P Right Peds p ~ SB Left P ~ Thru P P ~ Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 2.0 26.0 .0 3.0 .0 3.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 _Intersection Performance Summ ary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate __ _ _ _ _________ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS A 8.2 A E 56.3 E D 47.6 D Intersection LOS = B secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • ORIGINAL Analyst: JJS Inter.: Court ~yrtle RECEIVED Agency: WilsonMiller Area Type: CBD or Similar Date: 3/6/2006 Jurisd: Clearwater QPR n ~ 2~~6 Period: PM Peak Year 2008 Project ID: Clearwater Residence Inn PLANNING DEPARTMENT E/W St : Court Street N/S S.t : Myrtle Street CITY OF CLEARWATER ___~ __ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY---- _____ _ ____ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Sou thbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R _ ~ No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ OY 4 0 ~ 0 1 0 ~ ~__ 0 __ 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ LTR ~ LT ~ TR Volume ~ ~42 1285 76 ~12 235 ~ 156 29 Lane Width ~ ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar __ _____ Signal Operations--- _ _ _ __ +_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left ~ NB Left P Thru I Thru P Right ( Right Peds ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left Thru P ~ Thru P Right P ~ Right P Peds ~ Peds NB Right ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right Green 82.0 26.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound Westbound Cycle Length: 120.0 Intersection Performance Summary- Y~ __ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate __ ____ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS LTR 4121 6031 0.38 0.68 8.4 Northbound LT 344 1589 0.80 0.22 61.7 Southbound TR 356 1641 0.58 0.22 48.7 Intersection Delay = 19.6 (sec/veh) A 8.4 A E 61.7 E D 48.7 D Intersection LOS = B secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: JJS • Inter.: Chestnu~/ Myrtle Agency: WilsonMiller Area Type: CBD or Similar Date: 3/6/2006 Jurisd: Clearwater Period: PM Peak Year 2006 Project ID: Clearwater Residence Inn E/W St: Chestnut Street N/S St: Myrtle Street __ _ __ ___SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY __ __ ~~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ SouthboundA L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R --- - - I ------ ---- ~ --- - -- I ------~_~ No . Lanes ~ 0 4 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 2 0 ~ 0 2 0 LGConfig ~ LTR ~ ~ TR ~ LT Volume ~59 1425 29 ~ ~ 192 118 ~43 154 Lane Width I 12.0 ~ ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ Duration 0.25 -- ------- -- --- ----- Area Type: CBD or Similar __~~ __Signal Operations___ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left P ~ NB Left Thru P ~ Thru P Right P ~ Right P Peds ~ Peds WB Left ~ SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right Peds ~ Peds NB Right ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right Green 85.0 23.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound LTR 4378 Westbound Northbound Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary __ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate - __ _ _ _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 6181 0.38 0.71 7.3 A 7.3 A TR 588 3070 0.59 0.19 48.4 Southbound LT 449 2344 0.49 0.19 47.0 Intersection Delay = 17.4 (sec/veh) D 48.4 D D 47.0 D Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e • ~ ORIGIN Analyst: JJS Inter.: Chestn / Myrtle AL Agency: WilsonMiller Area Type: CBD or Similar RECEIVED Date: 3/6/2006 Jurisd: Clearwater Period: PM Peak Year 2008 ~PR ~~ 206 Project ID: Clearwater Residence Inn E/W St : Chestnut Street N/S St : Myrtle Street PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ___SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ ____ __ _ _ Eastbound ~ Westbo und ~ Northbound ~ Sou thbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R I L T R No . Lanes ~ 0 4 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 2 0 ~ 0 2 0 LGConfig ~ LTR ~ ~ TR ~ LT Volume ~62 1521 31 ~ ~ 204 125 I54 164 Lane Width I 12.0 ~ ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type CBD or Similar Signal Operations _ __ Y_____`_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left P ~ NB Left Thru P ~ Thru P Right P ~ Right P Peds ~ Peds WB Left ~ SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right Peds ~ Peds NB Right ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right Green 85.0 23.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound LTR 4378 Westbound Northbound Cycle Length: 120.0 secs __ Intersection Performance Summary____~_~_ _ __ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate ___ __ _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 6181 0.41 0.71 7.5 A 7.5 A TR 588 3070 0.62 Southbound LT 420 2193 0.58 Intersection Delay = 18.1 0.19 49.4 D 49.4 D 0.19 49.7 D 49.7 D (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HC52000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: JJS Inter.: Agency: WilsonMiller Area Ty Date: 3/7/2006 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Hour Year Project ID: E/W St: Court Street N/S St: Court MLK, Jr Ave pe: All other areas City of Clearwater 2006 MLK, Jr Ave ____ ___ _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY__ ______ ___ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R I L T R __~ -_ ~ ~_ No . Lanes ~ 1 ~2 0 ~ 1 2 0 ~ 1 1 0 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ L TR ~ L TR ~ L TR I L TR Volume ~85 1375 59 175 1108 30 ~27 216 91 ~24 137 18 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Duration Y 0.25 Area Type All other areas Y _ _____ Signal Operations__~___ _ ______ Phase Combination 1 2~ 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left P ~ NB Left P Thru P ~ Thru P Right P ~ Right P ORIGINAL Peds ~ Peds RECEIVED WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru P ~ Thru P qpR p 7 2006 Right P ~ Right P Peds ~ Peds PLANNING DEPARTMENT NB Right ~ EB Right CITY OF CLEARWATER SB Right ~ WB Right Green 12.0 70.0 26.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs __ Intersection Performance Summary ___ - Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ _____ _ _ _ ___ Grp Capacity- (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS - - ------ --------- - Eastbound L 181 1805 0.52 0.10 61.5 E TR 2097 3595 0.76 0.58 21.4 C 23.6 C Westbound L 181 1805 1.07 0.10 141.3 F TR 2102 3603 0.60 0.58 17.3 B 33.8 C Northbound L 206 951 0.15 0.22 39.5 D TR 393 1816 0.87 0.22 67.3 E 65.0 E Southbound L 71 326 0.38 0.22 54.9 D TR 405 1867 0.42 0.22 43.8 D 45.3 D Intersection Delay = 32.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: JJS ~ Inter.: Court ~ MLK, Jr Ave Agency: WilsonMiller Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/7/2006 Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2008 Project ID: E/W St: Court Street N/S St: MLK, Jr Ave `_~ ___ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY___ ___ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R No . Lanes ~ 1 Y2 0 ~ 1 2 0 ( 1 1 0 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ L TR ~ L TR ~ L TR ~ L TR Volume ~90 1468 62 1186 1188 32 ~28 229 97 ~26 146 19 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ______ ___ Signal Operations_ _~ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left P ~ NB Left P Thru P I Thru P Right P ~ Right P ORIGI Peds ~ Peds RECEIV pL WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru P ~ Thru P Right P ~ Right P aPR O 7 ZOO6 Peds ~ Peds PLgNNING DEPARTMENT NB Right ( EB Right CITY OF CLEARWATER SB Right ~ WB Right Green 12.0 70.0 26.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs _ _ Intersection Performance Summary ____~_ __ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ___+_ _ _ A_~_ _ ____ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound v - -~_ L 181 1805 0.55 0.10 63.1 E TR 2098 3596 0.81 0.58 23.3 C 25.5 C Westbound L 181 1805 1.14 0.10 164.8 F TR 2102 3603 0.65 0.58 18.2 B 37.7 D Northbound -L 197 908 0.16 0.22 39.8 D TR 393 1815 .0.92 0.22 75.3 E 72.5 E Southbound L 63 292 0.46 0.22 63.2 E TR 405 1867 0.45 0.22 44.4 D 47.0 D Intersection Delay = 36.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D BAYSIDE ENGINEERING INC, Observed Phase Timings SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION: ~~ ~ L , ~ . ~ ` /~v ~. ~ C O ~ ~~ ~'~ PERIOD: PM Peak COLLECTED BY: /~ p~ C:Itat e S`~' DATE: 3~~/06 Signal Cycle Ap rox. Phase Time (sec.} Phase No. Green Yellow Red 1 NBL 2 A/~~ ~ lA 3 T~ NBT 2 ~ 6 ~G ~ ~ 3 SBL 2 ~/~ ~G~~ 3 I~ ~ a6 SBT 2 ,~ ~ '' 3 ~~ ~ EBL 1 2 ~ ~1"t 3 / '° r'~ 1 ~O ~ EBT 2 ~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ ~ 6t ~ wBL 2 1 i2 3 3 ra ~ ~ gt 3 WBT 3 ~ ~ ~ Cycle Cycle A prox. C cle Length sec.) Length No. Total ~ : ~ . _ z ~, ~ r ~o 3 ~r . ~~ .:~ : ~~ t ORIGINAL RECEIVED aPR n'~ coos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF GLEP,RVJATER BAYSIDE ENGINEERING INC. Observed Phase Timings SIGNALIZED t ) INTERSECTION: CG'u9''f" S`~" ~ I~~/I~~I~ Uc PERIOD: nPM Peak COLLECTED BY: /`f~/~ C.l~~~'eSf- DATE: 3/g~oG Signal Cycle Approx. Phase Time (sec.) Phase No. Green Yellow Red NBL 1 2 h~ ~~ ~0~~ 3 r° 1 ,~ ~ .~ NBT 2 3 ~ ~ ~ SBL 1 2 ~~ ~ ~~~ 3 1 ~ ~ ~ SBT 2 ~ ~ ~ 3 ot~ .3 EBL 1 2 ~~ ~ ~~~ 3 EBT 1 2 ~ ~ `~ ~~ 3 WBL 1 2 ~/ ~ ~ / 3 1 ~ ~, WBT 3 ~ ~ .~ Cycle Cycle Approx. Cycle Length (sec. Length No. Total P ITi ~r ~ ~ ` ~ ~ i r ! fl S 2 ~, ~ ` e ' ~° i ~ n ~ O !X 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'F!fll j a a ORIGINAL RECEIVED ApR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~ BAYSIDE ENGINEERING INC. Observed Phase Timings SIGNALIZED 11 M. ~ ~`~ I1 ~,~ INTERSECTION: G ~l L'.~`~'A vfi S ¢' ~ ~ ^ ~7 PERIOD: PM Peak COLLECTED BY: ~d~1 C1~~~~es+ DATE: ,~~~/~(~ Signal Cycie A prox. Phase Time sec. Phase No. Gree n Yellow Red NBL 2 / ~ ~ j 3 1 a~ ~ NBT 2 3 ~ 3 ,~ SBL 1 2 ~ /~~ ~~~ 3 1 ~~ SBT 3 ~3 .~ EBL 1 2 ~ /~~ ~~ 3 EBT 2 ~ ~ 3 3 5 :3 WBL 2 ~~ ~ r~%R 3 WBT 1 2 ~/~ lV~~ 3 Cycle Cycle A rox. C cle Length (sec. Length No. Total 1 r N ~oC~ 2 ~ ~ j~~ 3 i ~' `~ f v~ e/~ ORIGIN,4L RECEIVED Q PR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' r ~u~ ~~~ ~ S ~. ~. ~~ ~ ~ O1~ e:aG :~ ~ , ~~~ rya ~S eI fo!N cavie~ fi:: /~~. ~ :, ~ ~- .. ~? ~ 4 J~. .~. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ a ~:- ORIGINAL RECEIVED pPfZ ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,~ ~ T February 15, 2006 iNritten for: ORIGIN,gL V~T11SOn Mlller RECEIVED ~ PR n 7 200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAR~'JATER Prepared by: Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Project Consultant: Michael Kettles RCA, CA, CF, 'd'IIiIEIE IEV~~.LTA'II'p~f~i, cov~2~' S~'~~~'~ ~~~p~c'~ C1LlEA186@7~'~'~,%3, ]F1L~II$II~A President • TREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA WrYtten for: Wilson Miller Sumxnary I conducted my initial field evaluation at the site on February 13, 2006, in order to evaluate the overall condition and species of 47 trees. The City of Clearwater required that every tree on the property that is in excess of four (4") inches DBH (diameter at 41/z feet above the ground) be evaluated, as to their condition, canopy spread, and other observations pertaining to health and structural attributes. On February 10, 2006, after accepting my proposal, I was subcontracted by Shaun Drinkard, of WilsonMiller, and asked to carry out the above referenced tree evaluation. Assignment I was asked to conduct a field evaluation of the trees, to number them individually for later identification, and to prepare a written report, including spread sheets, listing the condition, and health/structural attributes of all trees exceeding four (4") inches DBH. Also, I was to place the tree numbers on the AutoCAD tree survey drawing that was provided to me by WilsonMiller. Purpose and Use This Tree Evaluation serves as an informational guide, providing the condition, canopy spread, and health/structural attributes of all trees that were evaluated in this study. ORIGINAL RECEIVED aPR p'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Kettles' Environmental Services, Lnc. Page 1 of 3 C "TREE EVALLIATIOI~;, COL;RT STREET PROJECT CtEAR4VATER, FLORIDA Written far: WiLsen \-tiller Observations Site i, ~~, ~, ORIGINAL February 13, Za~CEIVED l~P~ (] ( 2~U6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVo/ATER The site is presently developed with several commercial buildings and parking lots for various uses. The predominant species of the trees that exist on this site were identified as follows: Live oak (Quercus virginiana), Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and Cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). Other species that were found scattered in small numbers on the site were: Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), Water oak (Quercus nigra), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Arborvitae (Thuja spp.), Queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana), Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta), and Rubber tree (Ficus elastics). Three species listed by Florida and invasive species was also found on the site, and are as follows: Chinese Tallow (Sapium sebiferum), Silk oak (Grevillia robusta), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). The site is located within the city limits of Clearwater, Florida. This commercial parcel of land is surrounded by other commercial properties on the south and west, a city park on the north, and multi-family residential on the east. Physical Description The overall condition of a majority of the live and laurel oak trees was found to be unsatisfactory, due to co-dominant leaders with included bark, poor form, areas of decay from old Limb breakage and wounding, and various stages of decline. The overall condition of the palms was generally good. Testing. and Analysis The conditions of the trees were evaluated using the scale system recommended by the City of Clearwater. This system identifies the condition of trees based on a scale of 0 - 6. Zero is a dead tree. One is in very poor or hazardous condition, or in severe decline, and unfit for the final landscape. Two is also in poor health or structurally unsound and unfit in the final landscape. Three is in relatively overall good health and structurally sound, but occasionally exhibits structural problems that can be corrected. Four is in very good health and structurally sound. Five is in excellent health and an excellent specimen of its species. Six is an outstanding specimen of its species. K2ttlec' Environmental Services, Inc Pave 2 ~~f H TREE EV:~LUATIOti, COL"RT STREET PROJE~ CLE~I2WATER, FLORIL}.A Written Eor•. Wilson .Lfitler RIGII~9Al. .CEIVED APR Q "~ 2006 February 13, ?00( P C N O G~ EARV'!A ERj Each tree was numbered on the plan, and their physical attributes evaluated and recorded on the data sheets. Discussion Most of the interior trees fail to have adequate physical qualities to warrant their preservation into the final landscape. Live oak tree # 28, which is a 52" tree, exhibits many physical problems. These problems are identified on the evaluation data form. Laurel oak tree # 45, which also is a 52" tree, appears in relatively good condition for a laurel oak of its age. I did not see any indication of included bark in any of the main lateral points of attachment, and the trunk appears structurally sound. There are several good quality live oak trees located along the east perimeter edge (Ewing Ave) of the site that could be saved in the final landscape, excepting obvious concerns with overhead power lines. Live oak tree #29, which is a 20" tree, is in relatively good condition with minor multi-branch caused bark inclusions away from the trunk out on several of its main lateral branches. This condition is correctable. Please refer to the attached Tree Quality and Canopy Evaluation Plan and the Tree Evaluation Data sheets to identify the locations and condition of these and other trees evaluated in this report. Recommendations Do to the close proximity of overhead power lines to the row of live oaks along Ewing Ave., and the fact that they are not exceptional trees, I recommend that they be removed at this time, and replaced with a substantial number of smaller growing evergreen trees (ie. Japanese blueberry, Yaupon holly). This should provide for an adequate buffer along the east perimeter of the property. Proposed parking within the drip line area of Laurel oak # 45 should be designed utilizing grass Crete, turf block, or similar materials that will allow aeration of the soils around the roots. Furthermore, no cutting into the natural grade should be permitted within this area. All subgrade and finish grade materials should be placed upon the natural grade, so as to avoid root cutting damage to the tree. KetHes' Envn•~~nmental Services, inc. Pale 3 ref 8 • TREE EVALUATIOti, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEAR6VATER, FLC7RIDA lVriEten for: lvilson ~Siller February I3, 2006 Prior to site clearing, all trees to be saved shall be barricaded according to tree barricade specifications of the City of Clearwater. The barricades shall extend to the drip lines of trees to be saved in most situations. Tree barricades shall remain in place during all phases of site clearing and construction. They shall be removed only when permitted to do so by Rick Albee, of the City of Clearwater. No grubbing, excavating, or filling shall be permitted within tree barricaded areas, nor shall the placement of any vehicles, equipment, out houses, building supplies, soils, chemicals, fuels, or other materials that could be harmful to the trees to be saved shall be permitted. All of the cabbage palms that fall within future construction areas are in good health and worthy candidates for relocation into the final landscape. ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Kettlrs' Em~ironmental Service;, lnc. Pale ~ ~f ORIGINAL RECEIVED TREE EV~Lli.aTTOti, February 13, 2006 COliRT STREET PROJECT ~y APR O / 2UQ6 CLE.ARGV?.TER, FLORID,4 Written tor: Witson Miller PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. It is assumed that the property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. 5. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser. 7. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor any copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser particularly as to value conclusion, identity of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any professional society or institute or to any initialed designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualification. 8. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant/appraiser, and the consultant's/appraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 9. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. 10. Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. Kettles Em•imnmental Services: [nc. f':+~e ~ •~i '~ U TREE EVALUATION, COL"RT STiZEET PROJECT CLE.AR4VATER, FLOP.IDA Written Eor. Wilson ~liller Certification of Performance ORIGINAL RECEIVED February 13,2006 APR 0 7 2046 PLANNING DEPARTMENT" CITY OF CLEARWATER I, Michael W. Kettles, Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Certify: a That I have personally inspected the tree(s) and/or property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation or appraisal is stated in the attached report and the Terms of Assignment; o That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; e That the analysis, opinions and conclusion stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts; o That my analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices; • That no one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report; o That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause on the client or any other party nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists, the International Society of Arboriculture, and the Society of American Foresters. I have been involved in the field of Arboriculture in a full time capacity for a period of more than twenty years. Si ned: ~ iC~ g Date: Michael W. Kettles RCA, CA, CF Kettles' Environmental Services, f.nc. Page 6 of R TRE E EVALUATI ON DATA COURT ST REET PROJECT Tree # Tree Species Tree Condition Tree DBH (") _Page 7 of 8 Observations _ _! 1 Live oak 3 16 Included bark; Power line conflict - --- 2 Live oak 3 13 Included bark; Power line con ict 3 Live oak 2 15 Included bark; Power line conflict _- _ __ 4 Live oak 2 11 Included bark; Power line conflict _- 5 Laurel oak 2 7,9 Included bark; Poor form ----------- 6 --- Laurel oak ----- ------ -------- 2 5 ---- ------ - Poor form --------- - ------------- - 7 Laurel oak 2 8 -- - ----- Poor form 8 Brazilian Pepper -- - -------- 1 8 - --- -- - - Invasive species------------ ---- ---------- -- ---_ --------_-_ -- - 9 Cabbage palm _ 3 18 Power line conflict 10 Live oak 2 6,4,6 Poor form 11 Laurel oak 2 5 Poor form 12 Live oak 2 9 Poor form 13 Live oak 2 15,15,9 Poor form; Dieback 14 Washington palm 3 14 Power line conflict 15 Cabbage palm 3 18 --------- - 16 -- Water oak 2 --------- - 5,9 --------- ---- Poor form -------- ---- ---- - -------- 17 ----- Cabbage palm 3 15 Poor form 18 Chinese Tallow 1 17 Invasive species; Extensive dieback _ _ - -------- 19 Live oak 2 6,7,8 Included bard; Poor orm 20 Live oak 2 5 Poor form 21 Laurel oak 1 6 Poor form 22 Live oak 2 15,8 Poor form; Power line conflict _ ___ 23 Brazilian Pepper 1 10,9,5,8 Invasive species n~ z O Z °~ C7 ~ v ~ m ~ m~ m ~ ~ m~ v Z D ~ ® ~ r m m ~z Tree # Tree Species Tree Condition Tree DBH (") Page 8 of 8 Observations 24 Live oak 2 7 _ - _ Poor form; Power line conflict 25 Live oak 2 11,10 Included bard; Power line conflict __ 26 Chinese Tallow 2 21 Invasive species - _ _ _ ___ _____ _____ 27 Cabbage palm 3 17 Heav lean - Y - - - - --- --- ---------- -- - - 28 _ Live oak - 2 52 Internal deca anoderma ,Serious mechanica damage and bark seperation; Poor orm; _ - Broken main laterals with decay 29 Live oak 3 20 Included bark in main laterals _ - __ __ __ 30 Cabbage palm -- 3 - _ ----- - -- 10 31 _-- Cabbage palm 3 20 - ---- - --- --- 32 Cabbage palm 3 14 ---- ---- 33 Silk oak 1 7,10 Poor form; Diebac --- - -- ------ ----- --- -------------- 34 Silk oak 1 9 Poor form; Die ac 35 Sweetgum 3 17 Minimal storm damage; Major sur ace roots 36 Cabbage palm 4 15 37 Queen palm 2 10 Nutrient de iciency - --------- -- ------------------------ 38 Queen palm 2 8 Nutrient deficiency __ _ - __ _ _- ---- 39 Italian cypress 1 5 Dec ine 40 Arborvitae 3 5 Considered a shrub _ _ -_ _ _______ ------ 41 Italian cypress 2 4 - Minor decline ------ -- 42 - ------ -- Italian cypress 3 8 43 Italian cypress 2 6 Minor decline 44 Rubber tree 4 40 (base) Multi-stemmed; Limited freeze and pruning amage -- 45 Laurel oak 4,3 52 -- Multiple main laterals-no evidence of included bark 46 Live oak 2 _ 16 Girdled by old support wires; Poor form 47 Water oak 2 24 Included bark; Dieback and decline in canopy ~s ~z O ~ - Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ v ~~ o ~ `~ y~ ~ v~ r ~z ti i s~" e~ ,~ . a~ R f ~ ~, ~. .', y ~;.~ i3: i ~~ ~a : - `. .~~.:~ , ~.~ ,, .~:: ~ e,,~ - ~, 1,. ~. ~~{: ~: ~ _~= ~ ~ ` r • ~y .,, .~r -.. , ..~ . ~~,,~r .~~~. '~, t~ r ~~ - M a`Y ~ ~. ~ 'k' ~.e~ ~:. k_. s f ~ .~ . _' -~ ~1 - e ..o"ji° s' p i "s < y c .~ c ' •~ ~~ ~ * +F •~ ~~ . _ • ~ . ~° "r. ~ '` y ~ U- 4 ~ ~; ~ ~ , ,,~w s~ . , r. . -.~~ rig '~ . ~ ~ ~ r 3 ~r ~? ~ ~ti a ~* ' 9 ~ ~•Q ~. ' ,; , . ~ ~1 N 1. ~ ~ 6 ~ ~'~ ~" _~.. ~, ~, ~., ,r. r :~ -~'~4TER,;~ r~' Pf°T~./A'/~ ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 7, 2007 POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARVVATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (72~ 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Mr. Bill Long The Clarkson Group, LLC 3100 University Boulevard South, Suite 200 Jacksonville, Florida 32216 Re: Second Minor Revision to FLD2006-02010 ~ 940 Court Street (Marriott Residence Inn) Dear Mr. Long: At its meeting of May 16, 2006, the. Community Development'Board (CDB) approved with conditions the above referenced Flexible Development application to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-903, and to allow four parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. On September 21, 2006, a request was submitted to revise the architectural elevations to incorporate a building design complimentary to the Mediterranean style of architecture, to modify the width of the drive aisle along the front of the building, to modify the amenities area, and to revise the landscape plan based upon those other aforementioned changes. These proposed revisions were deemed to be minor revisions and were approved pursuant to CDC Section 4-406.A, subject to those same conditions of approval as per the original development order. On November 6, 2007, a request was submitted to revise the width of the front entrance canopy from approximately 65 feet to approximately 45 feet in order to accommodate additional standard-sized windows on the second floor. Further, the request also added bath exhaust fans with decorative louvers to the building exterior where. the exhaust was previously designed to exit through the building's roof. In accordance with the provisions of CDC Section 4-406.A, the proposed revisions have been deemed to be minor revisions and are hereby APPROVED with the following conditions as per the original development order: 1 2 3 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions are addressed; That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Department conditions are addressed; That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the provision of wheel stops where the front of a parking space abuts either the screen wall along Ewing Avenue or any of the hedges across the balance of the site; That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the parking being placed "on grade" or root pruning being performed at the back of curb with regard to the large tree (tree #45) at the southeast corner of the site; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCiLMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER~~ November 7, 2007 Second Minor Revision Development Order - 940 Court Street (Marriott Residence Inn) Page 2 of 2 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the location of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site and landscape plans in a manner that meets the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided with a notation that states "all existing and proposed utilities shall be installed underground"; 7. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees are paid; 8. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not limited to electrical and water meters, is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscape improvements within the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way are installed pursuant to the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan and to the satisfaction of Staff; 10. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 11. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 12. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 13. That aright-of--way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of--way, and that separate right-of--way permits are obtained for all paver brick sidewalks along City streets; 14. That any overnight accommodation units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not constructed are returned to the Pool; 15. That if the conditions of approval associated with this development are not met, then the incentives gained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool shall be returned to the Pool; 16. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by May 16, 2007); and 17. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.te t cr,myclearwater.corn. Sincerely, ~.~ Michael Delk, AICP ``~" Planning Director S: IP/anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslCourt Street 0940 Residents Inn (D) - ApprovedlMinor Revision 11-06- 071Court Street 940 -Minor Revision Development Order 11-07-07.doc • ~~ THE CLARKSON GROUP, L.L.C. 10/31 /2007 Mr. Robert Tefft, Plamier III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 5~ Re: Staff Approval Request for Changes Made to Residence Inn by Marriott, 940 Court St. Dear Mr. Tefft, In order to facilitate the progress of our Residence Inn by Marriott project at 940 Court St., I am requesting staff approval of the following changes. 1. The width of the front entrance canopy has been shortened from approximately 65 feet to approximately 45 feet. All other features and massing remain unchanged. a. The reason we changed this is because of our franchisor Marriott. Marriott, on numerous occasions, requested that we allow for standard- sized windows on the 2nd floor in the central component of the building. Given the height requirements of the fire code and the spatial limitations of the site in this particular area, it became impossible to change the building-canopy connection point, and thus the dimensions of said windows. Asa "meeting of the minds" between us and Marriott, we agreed on a shortened canopy that allowed at least 2 of the 6 windows on the 2nd floor to be standard dimensions. 2. The bath exhausts fans, which were previously designed to exit through the building's roof, now exit horizontally though the building's fapade. In effort to turn a potential eyesore into something decoratively pleasing, we are terminating them with decorative louvers painted to match. a. This is a cost saving and constructability change we see necessary to mitigate budgetary risk. After some debate over high-rise fire safety additions required by Marriott and the City, we were left with over one- hundred thousand dollars in increases (even though our building is under 75 feet and thus not ahigh-rise by code). In order to maintain the health of the job, we needed to identify a minor change that allowed for savings. By moving the exit point of the louvers to the side of the building, we are able to garner such savings without jeopardizing the overall appeal of the building. Further, we look to put a positive spin on this change by adding decorative louvers that are painted to match and thus blend with the facade. 3100 University Boulevard South • Suite 200 • Jacksonville, Florida 322tb • Phone 904-359-0045 • FAX 904-356-1500 • •"' THE CLARKSON GROUP, L.L.C. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter and please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, ~, Bill Long 3100 tJniversity Boulevard South • Suite 200 • Jacksonville, Florida 322]6 • Phone 904-359-0045 • FAX 904-356-1500 ,. .. ... - ,# Bounds & Gillespie Architects, PLL C 7975 stage hills blvd. /suite 4 /naemphis tennessee 38133-4010 * ph (901)377-6603 fax (901)388-5765 TRANSMITTAL LETTER via FedEx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PROJECT: CLEARWATER, FL - Residence Inn ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 020614 DATE: 11-05-07 TO: Mr. Robert Tefft Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4567 727-562-4576 (F) If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. WE TRANSMIT: herewith FOR YOUR: use THE FOLLOWING: COPIES DATE 1 11-01-07 1 10-24-07 1 10-24-07 1 10-31-07 REMARKS: DESCRIPTION ST-1 Site Plan A-8 South Elevation A-9 North Elevation Letter from The Clarkson Group (to fascilitate the progress) Thanks, Pam Wurth (for Danny Bounds) (pw) by: Pam Wurth . ~ .~ ~ • ~ a ~ e r r,r~,r~,r~ ~~t ~~~ OF /Nf ,~,C,'~, c, ~ ; ' ~~~~~= ~ITY OF L~ARWA.'TER :'=3' `' `~ ~~ Q =~cr'' ; ~Q` PI.AI~INING DEPARTMENT "~r~: ~,oQ.d ^~ ors- ,J 11 ~'~~'QTEE~~; ~'' Posr OI=r,cr Box 4748, CLl;nxwn"rFR, FLORInn 33758-4748 ~~sirll MUNICIPnI. SERVICES BUILDING, lOO SOUTH MYR"PI,E AVIiNUE, CI,I?ARWn1"IiR, FLORIDA 33756 TEI,IiI>HONIS (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) 562-4865 LoIVG RnNGr; PLANNING DEVF;I,OPMEN"I' REVIEW February 15, 2007 Mr. Alessandro Colantonio Capmark Finance, Inc. 5201 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 570 Miami, Florida 33126 Re: Zoning Verification Letter -Residence Inn Marriott 940 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida (15-29-15-16830-003-0010) Dear Mr. Colantonio: This letter is in response to your request for zoning verification for the above referenced property. The subject property has a zoning designation of Downtown (D) and is located within the boundaries of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Pursuant to Article 2, Division 9 of the Community Development Code, the D zoning district permits overnight accommodation (hotel) uses through the Flexible Standard Development (FLS) and the Flexible Development (FLD) application processes, as applicable. At its meeting of May 16, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with conditions a Flexible Development application (FLD2006-02010) to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the D zoning district, and to allow four parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues, based upon positive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Subsequently, on September 21, 2006, a minor revision request was submitted to revise the architectural elevations to incorporate a building design complimentary to the Mediterranean style of architecture (a condition of the Board's approval), to modify the width of the drive aisle along the front of the building, to modify the amenities area, and to revise the landscape plan based upon those other aforementioned changes. On October 18, 2006, this request was approved in accordance. with the provisions of Section 4-406.A of the Community Development Code, subject to those conditions of approval set forth in the original Development Order. Should you need further assistance, please contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert. tef~~~mycleUrl-eater. com. Sincerely, Neil Thompson Development Review Manager Enclosure 1'r~n ; insil,~ru, i49,~~c~r, ;~,~~:~ i~c~rn~, Cc~i:nc:u.~n:atisei; I Icn~r I ln>w:rc~~, Coi ?:c:u.>rn:>nsr:r, 13ii.i.J<~;~,~cl~., Cc~i,ncn.~,rn-~nsi~a; C;,~ri.r.u A. Pr~rrrsi:~~. Cc>r~cn.>ii~:~n;ei; "ti~>uni, t:NU~i.~IVnIr:N~r n~~n ~rrir.:~In~nvl~: ~<`ru>~ l:,~mi.<» ~I~:R~~ a VV ~~p~Ql~ Q~ 5201 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 570 Miami, FL 33126 February 14, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department Municipal Services Building, 2"d Floor 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 RE: Proposed Residence Inn by Marriott -Clearwater To be located at 940 Court Street Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Mr. Robert Teffi: Attn: Mr. Robert Teffi (727) 562-4539 Capmark Finance Inc. is currently underwriting a loan to be secured by the above referenced property (the "Pro a "). In connection with this process, we are required to verify from the local jurisdiction that the Property is in compliance with the zoning ordinances and the building codes of the jurisdiction. The Lender will be relying on this information in underwriting the loan. This shall serve as an official request for a zoning letter verifying that the above referenced Property is in compliance with zoning regulations of the City of Clearwater. Also, please find enclosed payment in the amount of $25.00 payable to the City of Clearwater. Thank you for your assistance. Please contact Alessandro Colantonio at 305-373-6650, ext. 228 if you have any questions. Your prompt assistance would be greatly appreciated. You may fax or a-mail the completed letter and receipt of payment of the zoning letter fee to Alessandro Colantonio at 305-373-6651 or alessandro.colantonio(cci),capmark.com, and please also send the original letter to the above address. Sincerely, cv,n/ Alessandro Colantonio Real Estate Analyst ~~~ .~, ^r~. LONG RANGE PIANNING I~fiVIi1.OPMENT REVIEW October 18, 2006 I'TY C~ F ~ I.EARW1~"TE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pose' OFFICE Box 4748, CLEAItWA"1'F.R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAI. SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRI'LI: AVENUE, CI,EARWA"l'IiR, FLORIDA 33756 TIa.EFI~oNI: (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Mr. Michael M. English WilsonMiller, Inc. 1101 Channelside Drive, Suite 400N Tampa, FL 33602 Re: Minor Revision to FLD2006-02010 - 940 Court Street (Marriott Residence Inn) Dear Mr. English: At its meeting of May 16, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with conditions the above referenced Flexible Development application to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, and to allow four parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. On September 21, 2006, a request was submitted to revise the architectural elevations to incorporate a building design complimentary to the Mediterranean style of architecture, to modify the width of the drive aisle along the front of the building, to modify the amenities area, and to revise the landscape plan based those other aforementioned changes. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-406.A of the Community Development Code, the proposed revision has been deemed to be a Minor Revision and is hereby APPROVED with the following conditions as per the original Development Order: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions are addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Department conditions are addressed; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the provision of wheel stops where the front of a parking space abuts either the screen wall along Ewing Avenue or any of the hedges across the balance of the site; 4. That prior to the issuance, of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting, the parking being placed "on grade" or root pruning being performed at the back of curb with regard to the large tree (tree #45) at the southeast corner of the site; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the location of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site and landscape plans in a manner that meets the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided with a notation that states "all existing and proposed utilities shall be installed underground"; 7. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees are paid; Plc,~n~: I Insisnicu, M,~~cm, J~~ilr: Dt~it,~n~, Cc~iiwcii.,~u~::~iisin; I Ic~rr 11:~>ni:r~>,e, C~~i~~'~:u.~ut.wcer. Rn.l. Jc~nscrv, Ccwnc:u.:w.~~usi:u ® Cnri.F:n A. Yrn;r,~r:~, Cul nc:n.wt>nier, "L<<x ~ni. 1?n-rnl.c>v~IF:N r nvn AErnznlArivlt Acn<I~ I:;uhi.c» itr," October 18, 2006 Minor Revision Development Order - 940 Court Street (Marriott Residence Inn) Page 2 of 2 8. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not limited to electrical and water meters, is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscape improvements within the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way are installed pursuant to the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan and to the satisfaction of Staff; 10. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 11. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 12. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 13. That aright-of--way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of--way, and that separate right-of--way permits are obtained for all paver brick sidewalks along City streets; 14. That any overnight accommodation units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not constructed are returned to the Pool; 15. That if the conditions of approval associated with this development are not met, then the incentives gained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool shall be returned to the Pool; 16. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by May 16, 2007); and 17. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via a-mail at robert.tefft(a~Zrcyclearwater.com. Sincerely, ~~`%~'~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications) Court Stree10940 Residents Inn (D) - ApprovedlMinor Revision I Court Street 940 -Minor Revision Development Order 10-18-06.doc October 18, 2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° ~ar~a er 1OO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: Evan Johnson, WilsonMiller, (813) 223-0009 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Minor Revision FLD2006-02010 / 940 Court Street Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via a-mail at: robert.tefftnmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** • Oct. 18 2006 09:06AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FASO N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132230009 Oct. 18 09:05AM 01'17 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. ~, ~~~.~t+~+~ is :~~..at~ .,~;~. ~;., ~~. ~, - ~ WilsonMiller® New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 13, 2006 TO: Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FI 33756 SUBJECT: Clearwater Residence Inn REFERENCE NO: 05211-001-000 ~O~ TRANSMITTED: Three (2) Copies of the revised site plans for the Residence Inn at 940 Court Street in Clearwater. REMARKS: These are the sets with corrections that were made as a result of Planning Comments. If you need anything else, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (813) 223-9500. SIGNED. ~"( Evan n ,Planner CC: Danny Bounds, Bounds and Gillespie Architects Bill Long, The Clarkson Group Of/ices strategics//y located to serve vur clients 800.649.4336 Tampa O/fice 2205 North 20th Street • Tampa, Florida 33605. 813.2239500 • Fax 813.2230009 4r7/2006 44307 Ver: 011- KJemiga wi/snnml//ercom CAp03 05211-001-000- - 0 WilsonMille~ Inc. - FL Lic.! LC-0000170 ~e.,~ 1 C~Lc,~iLac~s~e.-1 ~ ~o~~~sS ~_~- ~_~~ ~ ~ti ~- ~ ~~~~= ~5 .C~J vtci sc~~ ,n~~ ~e .vim ,~^.~ ~ ~ J ~~ • Wils6nMiller® ~ '. `~s0 New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering r' ORIGIWI~. RECEIVED Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning SEP 2120Q~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater Florida, 33756 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CiEY OF CLEARWATER - Ver: AST CAll43 Subject: Downtown Clearwater Residence Inn Resubmittal (FLD2006-02010 - 940 Court Street) Dear Robert, Per our meeting on August 8, 2006, attached is the updated submittal package for the Clearwater Residence Inn. Included in this submittal are updated landscape architecture plans, engineering plans, and architectural elevations. This memo outlines the changes that have been made to the site plan since Community Development Board (CDB) approval on May 16, 2006. These changes primarily resulted from the comments heard during the CDB regarding to architectural design of the building, but also include some minor adjustments to improve circulation and convenience. Architectural Changes Exterior During the CDB meeting concern was raised that the proposed building did not adequately reflect a Mediterranean Revival architectural style, which is preferred within Downtown Clearwater. Utilizing only a slightly larger footprint as the original structure, architectural elements were added which served to soften edges and create a building with a more residential feel, which is appropriate given the site's location within the Town Lake Residential District. These changes included a shifting of the color palette to one that was warmer and more in tune with the surrounding buildings (see attached color rendering). Other changes include the use of awnings on the first floor, a redesign of the parapets along the top of the building, the addition of lintels above the windows, and a redesign of the front porte-cochere to make it consistent with the parapet changes on the remainder of the building. Interior Changes to the interior of the plan are minor, and include the reworking of some of the individual rooms, and the redesign of the stairwells on the north and east sides of the buildings to improve functionality. The lobby floor plan was also changed slightly, including a shift of the workroom and hotel offices to where the meeting room was originally, the library being moved adjacent to the breakfast room, and the laundry being moved into where the hotel offices were formerly located. A door was also added to the breakfast room to allow entry and exit onto the pool deck. Offices strategical/y located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 Tampa Office 2205 North 20th Street • Tampa, Florida 33605. 813223.9500 • Fax 813.223.0009 wilsonmi/lercom Wilson Miller, Inc. - FL Liar LG0000170 ' , ~ • Clearwater Residence Inn FLD2006-02010 - 940 Court Street Site Plan Resubmittal Page 2 of 2 Site Plan Changes Engineering Site plan changes have occurred in order to accommodate the slight change in the building footprint, and to improve circulation throughout the site. The attached exhibit illustrates the location on the site where the changes have occurred. The architectural changes to the building increased the size of the building footprint, and in addition the desire to have atwo-way drive along the front of the building, required that the building be shifted to the north and east. This shift resulted in a decrease of the northern and eastern drive aisles from 24' to 20', the increase of the front drive from 15.50' to 20', and the adjustment of all parking spaces to 90°. Other changes included the shifting of the pool, the addition of a barbeque area, and the relocation of the dumpster away from the pool. These changes also required a reworking of the grading plan, which relocated a retaining wall on the site. Both the entrance location on Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue remain in their original locations. Landscape Architecture Changes to the landscape plan were made to reflect the architectural and engineering plans. The result to the changes was an increase in the vehicular use area greenspace, the interior shrub area, and an increase in the number of trees planted on the site from 69 to 81. During the meeting on August 8, 2006, it was recognized by Clearwater Planning staff that the architectural changes that had been made to the structure were an appropriate response to the request of the CDB. The corresponding changes to the site and landscape plans reflect these changes, and also markedly improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Taken together, these changes will allow for a more functional and attractive hotel product appropriate for Downtown Clearwater. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact our office at (813) 223- 9500. Sincerely, Wi sonMiller, Inc. ichael M. English, AI Vice President Encl. Three (3) Color enderings of the Clearwater Residence Inn Three (3) Site Plans with Changes Noted Three (3) Sets of Signed/Sealed Engineering Site Plans Three (3) Sets of Signed/Sealed Landscape Architecture Site Plans Three (3) Sets of Architectural Floor Plans and Building Elevations - Ver AST CA#d3 i DRIVE AISLE ALIGNMENT CHANGED. DUMPSTER RELOCATED. - - ----- auxrc nu a. m~ mo>:a --- - ._-_______-__-IMI IRQ 19D f~MI NV ADD _____ J W n -__ __ __ ___ __ ~--B--o- E7--v--B. II I w ~ TII MC~inu ` rt. II dal ~ I - _ - __ __ _ ___ W I ;kp,...,t.~. II a ~'~ i'>:: I I ~ n If fI I +I I I °' I a ~~--J~1. II PARKING AND ISLAND o f - I - I '~ II ~ RECONFlGURED. 3 I ~ _ - ~ II ~ m I j ANGLED PARKING CHANCED TO 90'. - f _._' ~~ I DRIVE AISLE KIDENED TO 24'. ma. m• bsrz -- I I ~~!__l__....._._._w.. ,, - --. ' F~-.-~a~ ; Rai I J".' . } S" \~ I' ! -- - -- i - ~- ~ .._-_ __ ^w_` ~,..~ n~ I~ f r~7tL P~, ~~ I I I~ `r l I ~ L~' I Pea sT~s+ipTATED qr ~.., ~~ ply . ~a .,. I. H fllirr_mt^~ I ~ I --.. 3ARHEOUE AREA~C~CEI I ~. I\ !- TM~.irliN''I~k~!1 [1 ltl~'+. ~^ _xl - ._ _ -- _ __ \ \. "'~ '`'' ~ ~ ~ . °AFf{41C- lA'CYJF C!#ANE£D I I I ~ ~ I . I i~_. \\ ~ } ~• ~0~, ~. IJ.1~J, I~ T~rD r a III 1 I I ~ \ Dfil'rf AJAf. ~YM'tNi tHhld:r.~.. j w ~~. tlln_~11 I.!;iT,I7 1111}' ~ 1 '. ~ c+tA'r,tt wA.t REtcr>•.r.:~. _~ Ih~ i ~ ~ ~1 ^ I ~ ~ I b ba'I t x 1 ~ ~ I I f ! ~ ~' I I ¢ I ~~-'M ~...1 AX~'If sum TD 2~. I [. ~+: r' o ~S `, I I F~ ''~ ~~E ~~AYUt1T CJ~AG~S TD ~~ '~,, ' = I DCVY,~~`J~I C~~A~~VAT~~ ~~Sll~>~~fC~ ~N'~f -, ~ ;,; , I ~ TI .. ,. '.I 1 - "~~ s ~_~;~,~;~_,~,~,a ~I'I"Y ®F ~LEARWA'I"ER ~~"`A~ , `'~'~~ ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ey~'~ i G~~~i ~}~~ POST OFFICE; BOX 4748, CI.FARWATER, FI.owDA 33758-4748 a'wwp>~! MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUGH MYRTLE AVENUT;, CLEARWA7"ER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVIiLOPMENT REVIEW May 26, 2006 Mr. Michael M. English WilsonMiller, Inc. 1101 Channelside Drive, Suite 400N Tampa, FL 33602 Re: FLD2006-02010 - 940 Court Street (Marriott Residence Inn) Dear Mr. English: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On May 16, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, and to allow four parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 2.22-acre subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Town Lake Residential character district; 3. That the development proposal includes the demolition of the existing social/community center as well as all other existing improvements on the site; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the encroachments to the sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues will neither adversely affect the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, nor result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances; 2. That the use of 20 dwelling units (in the form of 27 overnight accommodation units) from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; Pr~wh l lusssnstr~, Mnv<~i( 13u.i.Jons<~rv, Via:-Mnvoi( JOiiN Dosinn~, Cs)nrccu.~u~.~nsra( HOrr Hn~~sn:r(~n, Cc~un(:u.nutMSSiaz Cnits.r:n~ A. Pr.rra(sr:n, Ccxm(:n.nut.wsra( ~~I:QUAI. I:MPLOYMEN'I' AND API~IKMA"I'IVIi A('PION I;MPLUI'I?R~~ ~~ 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Town Lake Residential character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 5. That the development proposal is consistent, with the Flexible Development criteria as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Ap rp oval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions are addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Department conditions are addressed; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the provision of wheel stops where the front of a parking space abuts either the screen wall along Ewing Avenue or any of the hedges across the balance of the site; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the parking being placed "on grade" or root pruning being performed at the back of curb with regard to the large tree (tree #45) at the southeast corner of the site; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the location of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site and landscape plans in a manner that meets the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided with a notation that states "all existing and proposed utilities shall be installed underground"; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised architectural elevations incorporating a building design complimentary to the Mediterranean style of architecture are submitted and processed as a minor site plan amendment; 8. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees are paid; 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not limited to electrical and water meters, is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 10. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscape improvements within the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way are installed pursuant to the City's Master streetscape and Wayfinding Plan and to the satisfaction of Staff; 11. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 12. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 13. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 14. That aright-of--way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of--way, and that separate right-of--way permits are obtained for all paver brick sidewalks along City streets; 15. That any overnight accommodation units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not constructed are returned to the Pool; 16. That if the conditions of approval associated with this development are not met, then the incentives gained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool shall be returned to the Pool; 17. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by May 16, 2007); and 18. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by May 16, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within three years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, pursuant to Section 4-502.B of the Community Development Code, an appeal of a Level Two (Flexible Development) approval may be initiated by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert. tefft~a,myclearwater. com. Sincerely, ,~~ `. ~ tip/ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: IFlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications) Court Street 0940 Residents Inn (D) - Approved I Court Street 940 - Development Order OS-26-06.doc ~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } ~arwa ~r ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: May 26, 2006 Evan Johnson, WilsonMiller, (813) 223-0009 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2006-02010 - 940 Court Street (Marriott Residence Inn) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 4 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via a-mail at: robert.te{~a~myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** May. 26 2006 03:43PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132230009 May. 26 03:42PM 01'42 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'h~lU' #84. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEBE CALL 1~-HELP-FAX C435-73291. ,r. , .. ' ~ ~„~.~~~ ~4`# ~AL~F7q I~~ ~~ ' ~'° ~ ITY O F C LEARWATE R a~• 'Q~ :~=-. ~ ~ ~ ~o POST OrFlcr: Box 4748, CLI:nRwn~rlai, FLORII)n 33758-4748 -9~~,~,"/'I C,~~~`{~04~ TI:LI:hHONI: (727) 562-4750 FnX (727) 562-4755 ~°I ~~G~, ' X14 PU131.IC WORKS ADM I NIS'f RA'I'I ON May 16, 2006 Mr. James Holt ' Vice President Development and Finance 3100 University Boulevard, South Suite 200 Jacksonville, Florida 32216 Dear Mr. Holt: Re: FLD2006-02010 Residence Inn 940 Court Street The site development improvements along the west side of Ewing Avenue for the proposed Residence Inn including sidewalk and parking as depicted on the attached Sheet 1 of 1 are acceptable to the City of Clearwater. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact this office. Sincerely, s~ ~ ~ y - ~ Michael D. Quillen, P.E. Engineering Director cc: S. Rice R. Tefft `~ FRnntc l lutiunizi~, Mnv<~a Bu.i.J~msrm~, Vice>Mnvor, ~~mn~ ll~~ia~n~, Co~~n~cai.au~:wtieie fic~ti-r Hnnniacm, Cc~un~c:u.~wrnnsrac ~ C,v;ia:rv A. Prrr:ksr•.n, Cc,uncai_au:wsr_u 'I:c;xlnl. LMhLCwMl:rv'I' nwi~ Arru;Mnrlvl: Ac-ru>n linu>i,c)vl:r," i. ~r1n ~ I- t~ ~ ra I~ I I ~ I I 2 -- _ °' A~ So°o. , ~ a~ '' :,. :::-`i ITS BENC ARK-=--~ ~s ~~ o> ~ C'' U ET NAI D DISK IN ORT ING AREA = ° ~ ~ . 6(. STORM ~~ PROP. SILT 75' OF 24" STOP BAR PROP. 134' BLOCK WALL TON = 29.45 = m uI m z j r / MANHOLE ~ FENCE ~ A N i / iii ` ~ PROP. CROSSWALK m v I ~ i ~z; i .f .. _.. ._..i~ ~ ~ ~ I aI I m I ~~ I II II II- t ~ RIG - AY PER ~LAT~ I 20. O ( i = --""""" CONC. VAIIEY~ wtai RIGHT-OF-WAY-~ ,~ e ~ ~ LINE OF SWING AVENUE EN/~ HAVEN U E O IRRIGATION METER Y DIA METAL ' ° m ' -mi ° 1D 3 ° ~ o ~ 2 CURB ro UNDERGROUND PROP. 5' CONCRETES N WATER SUPPLY FDOT INDEX X310 ~ N ro (30' WIDE GHT-OF-WqY PER PLAT) @ RPZ ASSEMBLY ' o POLES q o - g ~ Z A o;D 4 EX. 6' PVC WAT ° - ° u' o ° ° 16.5 WIDE F.P.C. EASEMENT O.R. BOOK 741, PAGE 648 ro CX6" WET TAP N Tn E TAP VALVE o EX ~ PVC ? r ~ ~ c m ER MAIN 132 50' o WATER MAIN o m ~ O a z o , ; ° . 0 10' WIDE ROAD 17.50' 150.00' _ ° o EX. FIRE HYDRANT ~'N°_ o m ~„ ~ Z ~ °om°~ ' mg °~ p ~ RADIUS = 308.56' ARC = 12,70• CHORD = 12.70• C.B. N.51'S3'46"W o RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT °• RECORDING INFORMATION . UNKNOWN REMOVE EXIST. C B INSTALL 80' VALL GUTFER REMOVE EXIST. DRIVEWAY SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN SCALE: t"=30' O' S' 15' 70' 80' R/W '_ Z ° FOUND NAIL D DISK STAMPED " 8208" ~ o o ~ • ~l """'^""`~° CLIENT: oerE: ~11/rsO~M~IIL~I~ THE CLARKSON GROUP, LLC „oR,=°~~5°~E. TITLE, ~~, . ~,.. ~,;I.. ~YOra . Land+OePe AmhMecb . TreropyleLan ConMeM ,"=3~• RIGHT O F WAY EX H I B I T ~~s°"'"`~~ ~,° PROJECT: DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER ~ERTC4N~ALG MadAVene Wee( IRO. &ednM1 Hxi~ J1145-~ ~ ~~ er 9p-7WOEro . WebSde mraMamieccan RESIDENCE INN , g 29 ~ 5' ~~ REFERENCE FILE NC.: PRQIECT NUMBER: os2>>-ooi-ooa i CF ~ ,f ~~f ~ WilsonMiller~ • ~ '. New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering O ORIGMAL RECENED Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Room 220 Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 April 17, 2006 Re: Proposed Residence Inn by Marriott 940 Court Street Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Elbo, APR 1 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OP CLEARWATER As we discussed, this letter is to address traffic operation and safety of the proposed driveway on Prospect Avenue for the above referenced project. As you know the existing driveway on Prospect Avenue at the north end of the project property does not conform to current city codes. The distance from Court Street to the existing drive is less than one hundred twenty five (125') feet and turning radius is ten (10') feet, not the required thirty (30') feet. In addition the existing driveway is forty three (43') feet wide and provides access to three (3) separate drive isles. This configuration has the potential to confuse drivers, which will be forced to choose one (1) of three (3) drive isles within a very short distance. To complicate this matter, when Haven Street was vacated no access easements where provided. The proposed hotel site has no legal right to use the adjacent property to gain access. The shared driveway serves primarily as a service entrance for the Ralph Richards Tower, including the dumpster and a storage container. The primary residential/visitor entrance to the Ralph Richards Tower building is further north on Prospect Avenue, where the parking is concentrated and the sign is located. The plans submitted April 7, 2006 show splitting the existing driveway into two (2) driveways. Each driveway would have the standard twenty four (24') foot width. This will reduce driver confusion by eliminating the number of drive isles to choose from. The hotel driveway will see a significant number of guests entering the site. This configuration provides a clean, clear and straight path for guests to enter, which helps keep the traffic flowing and prevents guest from obstructing thru traffic on Prospect Avenue. The proposed driveway for Ralph Richards Tower does not receive as many daily trips; primarily service and delivery vehicles. With the proposed configuration, these vehicles would have a clear, straight path to the buildings service area, which will help keep these vehicles moving and prevent them from obstructing thru traffic on Prospect Avenue. Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 Tampa Office 1 >Ol Channelside Driue, Suite 400 N • Tampa, Florida 33602 • 813.223.9500 • Fax 813.223.0009 4/17/2006- 44504 Ver: 041- KJemiga wilsonmillercom ~~~ 05211-001-000- ECOR- 2474 WilsonMiller,lnc. - FL Lic.,# LC-0000170 a; • Letter to Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Residence Inn by Marriott- 940 Court Street April 17, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Regarding the one hundred twenty five (125') feet distance requirement from Court Street, the proposed project only has ninety seven (97') feet of frontage. The existing condition is a non- conforming driveway, and the proposed driveways will also be anon-conforming condition. However it is not in the public interest to prevent re-development, and even when applying for Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) driveway permits, it is somewhat common for corner lots to be permitted with non-conforming driveways due to insufficient distance from intersection. In this case the intersection only has a fourteen (14') foot turning radius from Court Street to Prospect Avenue, and vehicles will be forced to slow down to make this turn. The proposed hotel driveway is located eighty (80') feet from Court Street, with the slow entry speed onto Prospect Avenue this should provide adequate space for vehicles to allow guests to turn into the hotel. In summary we believe the proposed driveway configuration on Prospect Avenue will improve traffic operation when compared to the existing condition. tf you find this configuration unacceptable, then we may have to consider other access designs that could include one (1) of the other existing driveways. Otherwise this site may not be developable, due to inadequate access. Please review the proposed driveway configuration and let us know if this development will be able to move forward on the current time line. We are available, at your convenience, to discuss any other options or recommendations. Should you have questions, comments or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, WilsonMiller, Inc. Hamid Sahebkar, P.E. Regional Manager, Public I Senior Associate cc: James Holt, The Clarkson Company 4H X2008-44504 Ver. 041-KJemige CAFi3 05211-001-000- ECOR- 2474 16:45 813-223-~9 WILSONMILLER INC • PAGE 02/03 April 14, 2006 Mr. Bennett Efbo City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Room 220 Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 17ear Mr. Elbo, As we discussed, this letter is to address traffic operation and safety of the proposed driveway on °cspect Avenue. As you know the existing driveway does not conform to current city codes. The distance from Court Street to the existing drive is less than 125' and fuming radius is 10', not the required 30'. In addition the existing driveway is 43' wide and provides access to three (3) separate drive isles. This configuration has the potential to confuse drivers, which will be forced to choose one of three drive isles within a very short distance. To complicate this matter, when Haven Street was vacated no access easements where provided. The proposed hotel site has no legal right to use the adjacent property to gain access- The shared driveway serves primarily as a service entrance for the Ralph Richards Tower, inGuding the dumpster and a storage container. The primary residential !visitor entrance to the building is further north on Prospect Avenue, where the parking is concentrated and the sign is located- l'he pions submitted April 7, 2006 show splitting the existing driveway into two driveways. Each driveway would have the standard 24' width. This will reduce driver confusion by eliminating the number of drive isles Eo choose from. The hoteE driveway will see a significant number of guests entering the site. This configuration provides a clean, clear and straight path for guests to enter, which helps keep the traffic flay-ing and prevents guest from obstructing thru traffic on Prospect Avenue. The proposed driveway for Ralph Richards Tower does not receive as many daily trips, primarily service and delivery vehicles. With the proposed configuration these vehicles would have a clear, straight path to the buildings service area, which will help keep these vehicles moving and prevent them from obstructing thru traffic on Prospect Avenue. Regarding the 125' distance requirement from Court Street, the proposed project only has 97' of frontage. The existing condition is anon-conforming driveway, and the proposed driveways will also be a non- conforming condition- However it i5 not in the public interest to prevent redevelopment, and even when applying for FDpT driveway permits, it is somewhat common for corner lots to be permitted as non- conforming driveways due to insufficient distance from intersection- In this case the intersection only has a 14' turning radius from Court Street to Prospect Avenue,- and vehicles will be forced to slow down to make this turn. The proposed driveway is located 80' from Court Street, with the slow entry speed onto Prospect Avenue this should provide adequate space for vehicles to allow guest to turn into the hotel. In summary we believe the proposed driveway configuration on Prospect Avenue wil) improve traffic operation when compared to the existing condition. If you find this configuration unacceptable, then we may have to consider other access designs that could include one of the other existing driveways. Otherwise this site may not be developable, due to inadequate access. Please review the proposed driveway configuration and let us know if this development will be able to move forward on the current timeline. If you have alternative access ideas please feel free to give us a call. We would be happy to discuss this with any options or recommendations you have. aisr~r_xt~eaaoa vc.:oz~.K.wn,i9o Gtla1 0.S;t~-OOvpOo- [COR-2o7~ - ~, ~;~e25 16:45 ~~ ' ;, /~ ~~ Sincerely, ` WilsonMlfler, Inc. 813-223-0009 • Hemid Sahebkar, P.~. Regional Manager, Public Infrastructure Senior Associate cc: James Holt, The Glarkson COmp2ny WILSSNMILLER INC~ PAGE 03/03 v?ArtOpg. de,5p4 Ver Ott- KdemlOa cn+..a C32!!.ppl.p~ £OpR. 2474 ~~ • . . . m • ~ Wrlso-nMrller gyp. New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering .~ April 12, 2006 Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Room 220 Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Dear Mr. Elbo, ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 1 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER On April 11, 2006 a meeting was held between City of Clearwater Staff and WilsonMiller representatives to discuss the design of the access point on Prospect Avenue for the proposed Marriott Residence Inn at 940 Court Street (FLD2006-02010). The agreement reached at the conclusion of that meeting was that the proposed entrance on Prospect Avenue could remain as shown on the site plan submittal of April 7, 2006 if the applicant, through its representative, would draft a letter discussing the importance of the entrance from an economic perspective and its functionality from a traffic engineering perspective. Existing Conditions The current access arrangement for the existing Senior Citizens Services Center includes two (2) access points on Court Street, one (1) access point on Ewing Avenue, and one (1) access point on Prospect Avenue, currently shared with the Ralph Richards Tower. None of the current access points have a thirty (30') foot radii, which are now required by City Code. The proposed access for the new Residence Inn, will include a single entrance on Ewing Avenue, and an entrance on Prospect Avenue, which,.will be moved slightly to the south of the shared access point. This arrangement provides for best circulation on site and maximizes the available parking. Economic Perspective The proposed hotel is a Marriott Residence Inn with one hundred fifteen (115) rooms. It is expected that the market for this project will primarily be tourists who are unable to stay on the beach and business travelers to Clearwater. The hotel rooms are designed for extended stay with some kitchen appointments and a larger layout with a separate bedroom/living area. Need for Adequate Parking The expectation is that the typical hotel patron, whether a business traveler or tourist, will drive a car to the hotel, so adequate parking is essential. The current parking standard requires one (1) space per room [one hundred fifteen (115) rooms], and the current design provides a total one hundred nineteen (119). This number has been maintained through several design changes, and represents the minimum that should be provided, given the need to provide employee parking as well. Following our final submittal of site plans, City Staff asked the WilsonMiller team to design some alternative entrance layouts along Prospect Avenue that would integrate the current shared drive. Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 Tampa ®/tice 1101 Channelside Driue, Suite 400 N • Tampa, Florida 33602 • 813.223.9500 • Fax 813.223.0009 4/142006- 44426 Ver. 021- EJOHNSON ~~~ wiisonmiilei com osz>>-ooaooo- - o WilsonMiller, lnc. - FL Lia# LG0000770 .' • Letter to Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Marriott Residence Inn - 940 Court Street April 14, 2006 Paae 2 of 3 Design alternatives were developed, but in order to create the required turning radius for emergency vehicle access, significant parking would be lost, which would be difficult from a business standpoint, and possible detrimental from a City Code standpoint if the total numbers of spaces were to drop below the minimum required. Need for Primary Entrance The Prospect Avenue entrance will function as the primary access point for the new hotel. The location and layout of the site will make Prospect Avenue a more visible entrance than Ewing Avenue for travelers heading west on Court Street. It is therefore important that this entrance be visible, attractive, and easy to navigate. The proposed design meets these criteria through the utilization of attractive landscaping and the direct entrance into the northern drive aisle within the parking lot. Traffic Engineering City staff has voiced concern over the proposed location of the Prospect Avenue access, in particular its proximity to the existing shared drive to the north. The existing drive is forty three (43') foot wide, and constitutes a portion of the now vacated Haven Street. The shared driveway serves as a service entrance for the Ralph Richards Tower, including the dumpster and a storage container. The primary residential entrance to the building is north on Prospect Avenue, where the parking is concentrated and the sign is located. Reduction of Traffic Congestion Traffic congestion will be reduced and minimized through site design concepts and aland-use change. The existing site is occupied by the Senior Citizens Services within three structures that total approximately twelve thousand (12,000±) square feet. Two (2) access driveways on Court Street, one (1) driveway on Ewing Avenue and one (1) driveway on Prospect Avenue serve these facilities. The proposed Residence Inn will reconfigure the site and reduce the total number of access points to two (2) driveways. One (1) access driveway on Ewing Avenue and the primary driveway will be located on Prospect Avenue. Reduction of Potential Traffic Hazards The access point on Prospect Avenue, as currently designed, removes possible hazards from Court Street. Court Street is a free-flow arterial through this area with no signalized intersection until Myrtle Avenue. Removing the existing Court Street driveways removes any obstruction of traffic flow on this segment and places all turning vehicles on either Prospect Avenue or on Ewing Avenue. Court Street also has a slight curvature between Ewing and Prospect, which can present sight obstructions from certain angles. Placing all access traffic on Prospect and Ewing will assist in reducing safety issues arising from a sight distances/obstructions. Throughout the site plan review process, the Applicant has been amenable to significant alterations to the layout of the building and parking in response to City Staff comments and concerns. This has included the relocating of the entrance on Ewing Avenue to the north and the redesign of the parking in front of the building. To this point, the Applicant has been able to accomplish these changes without a loss of parking, which he sees as very critical to the project's success. 4/14/2006- 44426 Ver: 021- EJOHNSON cnz43 os2»-oo0-000- - o Letter to Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Marriott Residence Inn - 940 Court Street April 14, 2006 Page 3 of 3 The proposed access points for the proposed project minimize conflicts in relation to the existing conditions currently at the site, and will ultimately benefit in a more attractive and effective pedestrian environment along Court Street leading into Downtown. It is our belief that the project not only brings economic value to the City, but a new and aesthetically pleasing building along an important corridor into Downtown Clearwater. I hope you find that this letter addresses your concerns. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, WilsonMiller, Inc. ~~~ Hamid Sahebkar, P.E. Regional Manager, Public Infrastructure Senior Associate cc: James Holt, The Clarkson Company 4/14/2006- 44426 Vey 021- EJOHNSON canna osz>>-ooo-ooo- - o ~ ~ Robert Tefft, Urban Planner III City of Clearwater Planning 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Flexible Development Application for Proposed Residence Inn Hotel at 940 Court Street -Response to DRC Comments The following is our response to comments generated from DRC held on March 30, 2006 for the property at 940 Court Street. Fifteen copies of the application packet are being submitted with this response. 2:15 pm Case Number: FLD2006-02010 -- 940 COURT ST TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Senior Citizens Services 940 Court St Clearwater, F133756 Owner(s): The Clarkson Group 3100 University Blvd S Ste 200 Clearwater, F132216 TELEPHONE: 904 359- 0045, FAX: 904-356-1500, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Michael M English 1101 Channelside Drive Tampa, Fl 33602 TELEPHONE: 813-223-9500 ex284, FAX: 813-223-0009, E-MAIL: michaelenglish@wilsonmiller. com Representative: Location: The 2.19 acre subject property is located at the northwest comer of Court Street and Ewing Avenue. Atlas Page: 287A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development request to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Clearwater, Fl 33758 ORIGIN,gL P o sox s2oa RECEIVED Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: ~p~ ~ ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 417200& 44062 Ver 02!- EJOHNSON CAp43 05211-002-004 - 0 The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, March 30, 2006 -Page 30 Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30-feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 108. The turning radii have been reconfigured to 30' at all driveway entrances on both the Landscape and Engineering Plans. To allow fora 30' radius, the entrance on Ewing Street was moved to the north. 2. Note on the plan that the 15-foot sanitary sewer easement has been vacated per O.R. Book 14829, pages 2257 and 2258. It has been noted on the Site Plan that the 15-foot sanitary sewer easement has been vacated. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Provide a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from D.O.T. for all work proposed in Court Street right-of--way. Noted 2. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaimed water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) Noted 3. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. Noted 4. Provide a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main prior to issuance of a building pemut. The health pernvt application form(s) can be found at: ORIGINAL www.dep.state.fl.ushvateridrinkingwater/forms.htm RECEIVED A copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main shall be provided. APR ~'~ 206 All polyvinyl chloride pipes shall be laid with an insulated 12 gauge A.W.G. solid strand ptANNING DEPARTMENT copper wire wound around the pipe forming one complete spiral per joint of pipe. This wire is to CIN QF CLEARV!JATER be continuous with splices made only by methods approved by the Engineer. This wire is to be secured to all valves, tees and elbows. See City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B", Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.02(B)(2). Noted. 6. Brick paver crosswalk in 10-foot right-of--way easement on west side of Ewing Avenue shall be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standazds index #116. Provide detail on plans. Brick paver detail will specify the City of Clearwater Standards index #116 (Landscape Plan) 4/7/200& 44062 Ver. 02!- EJOHNSON CAN43 05217-002-000-- 0 All utility pole relocations to be coordinated with the owners of such facilities as-noted on drawings. The pole relocations will accommodate the proposed sidewalk and/or drive apron(s) installation within the right-of--ways of the adjacent streets. City requires a 2-ft. horizontal clearance from edge of sidewalk to any vertical obstruction. Noted. A 2-ft. horizontal clearance from edge of sidewalk to any vertical obstruction shall be provided. 8. Show on the plan location of proposed Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) The location of the Fire Department Connection has been shown on the plan. Sheet #2 and #8 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. Noted. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Stormwater Buy-In Application must be submitted to environmental division. Stormwater Buy-In Application has been completed and included in the Application Packet. FIRE: Turning radius for emergency vehicle access is required to be 30' minimum Show PRIOR TO CDB Turning radii have been reconfigured to allow for emergency vehicle access on both the Landscape and Engineering Plans. All drive aisles are required to be 24' minimum width Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB The drive one-way drive aisles fronting the angle parking are both 20' in width. This was approved through discussions with Mr. Leonard Rickard of the Clearwater Fire Department. The remaining drive aisles in the parking lot are all 24'. 3 .. Hydrants must be installed every 300' in parking area. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB Hydrants have been installed as requested. 4. FDC for fire sprinkler system must be within 40' of a fire hydrant and at least I S' away from building. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB A fire department connection has been shown on Site and Utilities Plan (Sheet 4). 5. This building is required to have an automatic Class 1 Standpipe system with a fire pump. Acknowledge and show proposed location of the fire pump PRIOR TO CDB The proposed location of the fire pump room has been shown on the Site Plan. 6. Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the ORIGINP.L RECEIVED :~Pl~ p 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C{TY OF CLEARWATER 4/72006- 44062 Ver. 021- EJOHNSON CAfb3 05211-002-000--0 • developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. Fire Flow Calculations have been provided and copies have been included in Application Packet. Mr. Rickard with the Clearwater Fire Department agreed that the calculations provided would be sufficient for CDB. Harbor Master: ORIGIf~AL RECEIVED No Comments Legal: ~ Q~ ~ ~ 2U06 No Comments PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Land Resources: If trees #3 and 4 are to be preserved reroute the proposed irrigation and water mains prior to CDB. As stated in an email from Robert TefFt on 02.23.06 we are not required to submit a irrigation plan, only that a note be included on the landscape plan that automatic, 100% irrigation coverage will be provided. Any irrigation lines around trees 3 and 4 would be rerouted or placed at grade to eliminate conflict with the root system. The water mains into the site were relocated to the south to minimize impact to the trees. Place the side walk "on grade" under the canopy of tree #45 prior to CDB. A note shall be provided on the Civil plan stating that the sidewalk shall be on-grade under the canopy of tree #45. Provide a section through the sidewalk (on grade), tree #45 and the proposed parking lot (pervious concrete on grade). Note, no pervious concrete detail was shown on the landscape plan as stated on the site plan. Provide prior to CDB. The site plan will include location and detail for the pervious pavement near the SE corner of the parking lot. Section C-C on the Grading and Drainage Plan has been provided to illustrate grade change from Court Street to the parking lot proximate to tree #45. Landscaping: ~~~ Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.B.1., at time of installation shade trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches. The Landscape Planting Schedule (sheet LP-502) does not provide the proposed caliper of the Live Oaks and Drake Elms. The Landscape Schedule will be updated to include the installed caliper size for all listed trees. /~~ Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.B.1., shade trees shall be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. The proposed Live Oak on the south side of the Prospect Avenue ingress/egress drive and the two (2) Drake Elms located in the terminal landscape islands at the northeast corner of the site do not comply with this requirement. The landscape islands will be adjusted to allow for a shade tree planted with a minimum of five feet from any impervious area. ~ Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.B.1., at time of installation palms shall have a minimum of ten feet (10') clear and straight trunk. The Landscape Planting Schedule (sheet LP-502) does not indicate the provision of straight trunk. The Landscape Schedule will be updated to include the minimum of ten ft. clear and straight trunks for all palms. 4(//200f> 44062 Ver 021- EJOHNSON CAMd3 os2t t-ooz-ooo- - o • • Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.E.1., one (])interior tree is / required for every ] 50 square feet of required interior greenspace. As the development proposal requires 4,658 square feet of interior greenspace, a total of 31 interior trees are required; however only 25 interior trees are proposed to be provided. Areas exist where additional trees/palms can be provided that would enable the development proposal to meet the above requirement. Staff can locate these areas for you, if needed, at the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting. Additional trees will be added to the VUA in order to meet the required number. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.E.1., 50% of the required interior greenspace shall be shrubs. It appears that the required is being met; however provide calculations that support that this requirement is being met. i ~g n~~i / .,e,n[ ~f.~ ~ ~~~ ~~o~ ~b U Interior greenspace calculations will be included on the landscape plan for required shrubs. ~~ T'he proposed landscaping along the south side of the Ewing Avenue ingress/egress drive aisle conflicts with the sidewalk. Revise the landscape plan accordingly. Ensure that the Live Oak tree is planted the minimum required five feet (5') from any impervious areas [ref. Section 3-1202.B.1.]. The planting within the landscape island will be adjusted to coordinate with the proposed sidewalk on the site plan. Please provide the landscape planting schedule (found on sheet LP-502) on the landscape plan Stormwater: Prior to D.O., the Engineer is to provide calculations showing that the proposed development has less impervious area than the existing site. (sheet LP-101). The landscape planting schedule will be included on the landscape plan (sheet LP-101) Parks and Recreation: No Comments NOTED Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Driveway on Ewing Avenue does not meet the connection spacing requirements of 125-feet from the intersection with Court Street. (Community Development Code Section 3-102.). The proposed driveway has been moved north on Ewing Street. 2. Provide stop sign and stop bar per current MUTCD where appropriate. Have been provided and shown on the site/landscape plans. 3. Provide a larger radius or flare for vehicles turning right into the driveway on Prospect Avenue. ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4/72006 44062 Ver: 02!- EJOHNSON CAp43 osz>>-ooz-ooo--o • The radii for both entrances have been reconfigured to allow for 30' radii. 4. Provide wheel stops where parking spaces abut a sidewalk. Wheel Stops will be provided on the Landscape and Site Plans. Provide an accessible route from public sidewalk to the building's accessible entrance. (Chapter 11 Florida Buiding Code Section I 1-4.3.) A possible grade change in the sidewalk or small ramp near the plaza will allow access from the public sidewalk. Accessible ramp has been shown on Landscape and Engineering Plans. Revisions to Traffic Impact Study will be required. Contact with Bennett Elbo confirmed that the Transportation Analysis submitted March 24, 2006 was sufficient and addressed City concerns. Show driveway and parking spaces for property to the north. Suggest incorporating existing driveway on south Prospect Avenue for access management requirement. Sketch of potential entrance using shared driveway has been attached. This existing radius of the access point is 10'. In order to meet minimum Emergency Access Standard, the site would lose significant parking, and a portion of the fence located to the north would have to be removed. The proposed entrance on Prospect allows fora 30' radius and the site to maintain needed parking. General Note(s): I) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: ~1~ The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #4 does not address how the design of the development will minimize traffic congestion. 'The response does state that the proposed use will generate fewer trips than the existing use and that pedestrian connections will be improved, but nothing regarding the minimization of traffic congestion through design. Criterion #4 has been amended to include a statement on Traffic Congestion. f~ Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-806, no wall shall be located within any right-of--way easement unless specifically authorized by the City Engineer. The proposed retaining wall will encroach within the right-of--way easement along Ewing Avenue. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~ pR n 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The City Engineer has agreed that this easement is not identified on the City of Clearwater maps, ~~o~ and that it can be used for walls, sidewalks, and landscaping by the proposed hotel. '~`/p- ~ ~ ~ ,~ o_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A., in addition to the provision of sight visibility triangles at the intersections of driveways and rights-of--way, 20 foot sight visibility triangles must also be provided where two (2) rights-of--way intersect. Provide revised site and landscape plans. \!- Site triangles have been added at the intersections of Ewing /Court and Prospect /Court. ~4~ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, all utilities shall be installed underground. Provide a notation on ~' the utility plan to this effect. Notation has been added. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences/walls shall complement and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. The retaining wall section drawing denotes that the color of the stucco finish is "to be 4/7/2006 44062 Ver. 02!- EJOHNSON CAfld3 05211-002-000. - 0 determined". It is suggested that the color be consistent with the primary color of the principle structure. Further, please clarify how the "Old Chicago" veneer with be consistent with the principal structure. The stucco color will be consistent with the building stucco (shown on building elevations). "Old Chicago" Veneer is to be used along the bottom of the wall in a similar manner to the building. ~,(f~ Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The "base" of the proposed building is clearly defined by its unique color and materials/architectural elements. However, the "cap" lacks definition and blends far too easily with the "middle" of the building. We will continue to work on created a greater emphasis on the "cap" of the building. The rendered elevations sent earlier this week have a stronger "cap" and could be used for this meeting to show our progress to achieving the desired effect. Elevations have been altered to emphasize "cap". Robert Tefft has seen these new elevations, and agreed that they satisfied the comment. ~7-?' Provide a detail for the proposed fencing to enclose the swimming pool area. This has been added to the Application Packet. v8. '' Provide floor plans for the proposed hotel. Also, provide a roof plan for the hotel. ~~ a Floor plans have been included in the Application Packet. ~~ i1,uS ~ Depict on the site plan and/or roof plan the locations of all mechancial equipment including a/c Pf'~~~"° and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view of adjacent properties and rights-of--way. ORIGINAL RECEIVED e pR n 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Potential roof equipment has been located on the roof. Pool equipment has been located next to the pool deck. An elevation and description of screen wall is provided in the drawing. Robert Tefft viewed the roof plan and agreed that the roof plan will satisfy his comment. C.~-1O• °F 10. Depict the locations of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site plan and landscape plan. APC'17~•/~~' Please be advised that all proposed light fixtures/poles must meet the requirements of CDC Section 3-1302. ~~ ~ C'am' The light fixtures are currently on the hardscape plan and will be copied to the landscape plan and site plan. A note will be added for verification of applianc with CDC Section 3-1302 ~y .In addition to the section drawing of the retaining wall already provided, submit an elevation drawing of the retaining wall. A retaining wall elevation will be included with the section. ilk' Provide clarification as to the depth of the recesses in the facade of the proposed building. A diagram showing the building level profiles has been developed to show the building recesses. Mr. Tefft has seen these and noted that they are sufficient. ~~~ While no provision exists within the Community Development Code regarding the proximity of a refuse enclosure to a swimming pool, these are not necessarily the most compatible of elements. It is recommended that you consult with the Health Dept. to ensure against any provisions that may exist regarding this issue, if any. The Health Department was contacted, and they stated that their were no specific requirements regarding the distance of a trash dumpster to the pool. Robert Tefft was OK with this. A landscape buffer has been added between the pool deck and the dumpster location to help separate the two functions. Most of the trash from the hotel will be paper waste and dry waste. 4/7/2006 44062 Ver. 02!- EJOHNSON CAp03 os2~ i-ooz-ooo• - o • • The proposed drive aisle adjacent to the front of the hotel appears to function first as a two-way drive aisle, then as a one-way drive aisle (as a drop-off lane), and then again as a two-way drive aisle based upon its dimensions. Also, those two-way drive aisle portions include perpendicular parking tiers. The segments of this drive aisle will conflict with one another; therefore it is recommended that the entire drive aisle is redesigned as a one-way drive aisle with angled parking tiers and do not enter signage, as appropriate. The parking adjacent to the front drive aisle has been angled to emphasize that the aisle is one-way. One-way signage has been noted on the plan. Other: No Comments Notes: This development proposal has been tentatively scheduled for the May 16, 2006 CDB agenda. In order to remain on this agenda, submit 15 collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comments by Noon, Apri17, 2006. ORIGINAL RECEIVED QPR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4/7200644062 Ver: 02!-EJOHNSON CAp43 05211-002-000- - 0 ..i • O V~ O_ V ~ oo.oo' - - - ,~ I O ~~. I ~~ r~ m ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ORIGINAL 7 DISK #LS2os RECEIVED SOUTH PROSPECT AVENUE R~ (60' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY PER PLAT) EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY u, piANNING DEPARTMENT LINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE o -- - - - --- ----- o CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 .00°02'24'' E. 97:06'' 50' ~P) o _~_ - n /00~ ~~ O~ ~_// _ 1, ~O~co ~ ,4~ C. ~ ~_ I I I I I I D? r ~ r~ COVEREDI ~ 6 SPACES ' ~ ~. ,,: ~ N. ~ 2 S 9. 5' WIDE NITARY n 4009, I ~~ m ~ ~ ~ O~ n c~ \ c~ -D+ o \ z - - ~ I r ~ I m O ~ v ~ p ~ ~ ? N m ~ 1 N ~ , a-.J I D n rat (P) EAS 6 X0.00' ~ `, -i ~~~ G _=: _._ -- ` - ' ~ _.: _ „i cn ~;; ~o ::. -- -• ~;; =i - m `-~ D n Z m ~ ° ~ d~`Sti ~O'~ ~~~ ~1 I ~~0~ ~~ L ~ ORIGINAL . ~ RECENED ~ pR ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 2.15 ptn Case Number: FLD2006-02010 940 COURT ST Owner(s): Senior Citizens Services 940 Court St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant The Clarkson Group 3100 University Blvd S Ste 200 Clearwater, Fl 32216 TELEPHONE: 904 359- 0045, FAX: 904-356-1500, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Michael M English 1101 Channelside Drive Tampa, F133602 TELEPHONE: 813-223-9500 ex284, FAX: 813-223-0009, E-MAIL: michaelenglish@wilsonmiller.com Location: The 2.19 acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of Court Street and Ewing Avenue. til Atlas Page: 287A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development request to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, March 30, 2006 -Page 30 ~ ~ ~ 1 . 1. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30-feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #108. ~` 2. Note on the plan that the 1$-foot sanitary sewer easement has been vacated per O.R. Book 14829, pages 22$7 and 22$8. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide a copy of an approved right-of--way permit from D.O.T. for all work proposed in Court Street right-of--way. 2. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaimed water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) 3. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.09$), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 4. Provide a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main prior to issuance of a building permit. The health permit application form(s) can be found at: www.dep.state.fl.us/water/drinkingwater/forms.htm $. All polyvinyl chloride pipes shall be laid with an insulated 12 gauge A.W.G. solid strand copper wire wound around the pipe forming one complete spiral per joint of pipe. This wire is to be continuous with splices made only by methods approved by the Engineer. This wire is to be secured to all valves, tees and elbows. See City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B", Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.02(B)(2). 6. Brick paver crosswalk in 10-foot right-of--way easement on west side of Ewing Avenue shall be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #116. Provide detail on plans. 7. All utility pole relocations to be coordinated with the owners of such facilities as-noted on drawings. The pole relocations will accommodate the proposed sidewalk and/or drive apron(s) installation within the right-of--ways of the adjacent streets. City requires a 2-ft. horizontal clearance from edge of sidewalk to any vertical obstruction. 8. Show on the plan location of proposed Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) 9. Sheet #2 and #8 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Stormwater Buy-In Application must be submitted to environmental division prior to DO Fire: '''j , Turning radius for emergency vehicle access is required to be 30' minimum Show PRIOR TO ~ CDB ~ 2 , All drive aisles are required to be 24' minimum width Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Hydrants must be installed every 300' in parking area. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB {" 4 . FDC for fire sprinkler system must be within 40' of a fire hydrant and at least 1$' away from `~= building. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB $ , This building is required to have an automatic Class 1 Standpipe system with a fire pump. Acknowledge and show proposed location of the fire pump PRIOR TO CDB 6 , Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure ,, __~ an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. OC Harbor Master: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, March 30, 2006 -Page 31 d Legal: No Comments Land Resources: • If trees #3 and 4 aze to be preserved reroute the proposed imgation and water mains prior to CDB. Place the side walk "on grade" under the canopy of tree #45 prior to CDB. 3 . Provide a section through the sidewalk (on grade), tree #45 and the proposed parking lot (pervious concrete on grade). Note, no pervious concrete detail was shown on the landscape plan as stated on the site plan. Provide prior to CDB. Landscaping: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.B.1., at time of installation shade trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches. The Landscape Planting Schedule (sheet LP-502) does not provide the proposed caliper of the Live Oaks and Drake Elms. 2 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-]202.B.1., shade trees shall be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. The proposed Live Oak on the south side of the Prospect Avenue ingress/egress drive and the two (2) Drake Elms located in the terminal landscape islands at the northeast comer of the site do not comply with this requirement. 3 , Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.B.1., at time of installation palms shall have a minimum of ten feet (]0') cleaz and straight trunk. The Landscape Planting Schedule (sheet LP-502) does not indicate the provision of straight trunk. 4 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.E.1., one (1) interior tree is required for every 150 square feet of required interior greenspace. As the development proposal requires 4,658 squaze feet of interior greenspace, a total of 31 interior trees are required; however only 25 interior trees are proposed to be provided. Areas exist where additional trees/palms can be provided that would enable the development proposal to meet the above requirement. Staff can locate these areas for you, if needed, at the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting. 5 , Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.E.1., 50% of the required interior greenspace shall be shrubs. It appears that the required is being met; however provide calculations that support that this requirement is being met. 6 . The proposed landscaping along the south side of the Ewing Avenue ingress/egress drive aisle conflicts with the sidewalk. Revise the landscape plan accordingly. Ensure that the Live Oak tree is planted the minimum required five feet (5') from any impervious areas [ref. Section 3-1202.B.1.]. '7 . Please provide the landscape planting schedule (found on sheet LP-502) on the landscape plan (sheet LP-101). pC Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: 1 . Prior to D.O., the Engineer is to provide calculations showing that the proposed development has less impervious area than the existing site. k Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, March 30, 2006 -Page 32 • 1. Driveway on Ewing Avenue does not meet the connection spacing requirements of 125-feet from the intersection with Court Street. (Community Development Code Section 3-102.) 2. Provide stop sign and stop bar per current MUTCD where appropriate. 3. Provide a larger radius or flare for vehicles turning right into the driveway on Prospect Avenue. 4. Provide wheel stops where parking spaces abut a sidewalk. 5 Provide an accessible route from public sidewalk to the building's accessible entrance. (Chapter 11 Florida Buiding Code Section 11-4.3.) ~evisions to Traffic Impact Study will be required.~S~ ~- ~• ~l'$'D ~~ ~' 7. Show driveway and parking spaces for property to the north. Suggest incorporating existing driveway on south Prospect Avenue for access management requirement. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1 . The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #4 does not address how the design of the development will minimize traffic congestion. The response does state that the proposed use will generate fewer trips than the existing use and that pedestrian connections will be improved, but nothing regarding the minimization of traffic congestion through design. 2 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-806, no wall shall be located within any right-of--way easement unless specifically authorized by the City Engineer. The proposed retaining wall will encroach within the right-of--way easement along Ewing Avenue. 3 . Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A., in addition to the provision of sight visibility triangles at the intersections of driveways and rights-of--way, 20 foot sight visibility triangles must also be provided where two (2) rights-of--way intersect. Provide revised site and landscape plans. 4 . Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, all utilities shall be installed underground. Provide a notation on the utility plan to this effect. 5 . Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, fences/walls shall complement and be consistent with the principal structwe with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. The retaining wall section drawing denotes that the color of the stucco finish is "to be determined". It is suggested that the color be consistent with the primary color of the principle structure. Further, please clarify how the "Old Chicago" veneer with be consistent with the principal structure. 6 . Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The "base" of the proposed building is clearly defined by its unique color and materials/architectural elements. However, the "cap" lacks definition and blends far too easily with the "middle" of the building. 7 . Provide a detail for the proposed fencing to enclose the swimming pool area. 8 . Provide floor plans for the proposed hotel. Also, provide a roof plan for the hotel. 9 . Depict on the site plan and/or roof plan the locations of all mechancial equipment including a/c and pool equipment and how said equipment is proposed to be screened from view of adjacent properties and rights-of--way. 10 . Depict the locations of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site plan and landscape plan. Please be advised that all proposed light fixtures/poles must meet the requirements of CDC Section 3-1302. 11 . In addition to the section drawing of the retaining wall already provided, submit an elevation drawing of the retaining wall. 12 . Provide clarification as to the depth of the recesses in the facade of the proposed building. ~~. , While no provision exists within the Community Development Code regarding the proximity of a refuse enclosure to a swimming pool, these are not necessarily the most compatible of elements. II is recommended that you consult with the Health Dept. to ensure against any provisions that may exist regarding this issue, if any. 14 . The proposed drive aisle adjacent to the front of the hotel appears to function first as a two-way drive aisle, then as a one-way drive aisle (as a drop-off lane), and then again as a two-way drive aisle based upon its dimensions. Also, those two-way drive aisle portions include perpendicular parking tiers. The segments of this drive aisle will conflict with one another; therefore it is recommended that the entire drive aisle is redesigned as a one-way drive aisle with angled parking tiers and do not enter signage, as appropriate. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, March 30, 2006 -Page 33 • Other: No Comments Notes: This development proposal has been tentatively scheduled for the May 16, 2006 CDB agenda. In order to remain on this agenda, submit 15 collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comments by Noon, April 7, 2006. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, March 30, 2006 -Page 34 I~I~~ii~~or~a ~;+_ ``~~'~~ ;' ~`~' CITY O F C L E A R W A T E R mar= ~ ®° ~~ `~-;~~~,o PLANNING DEPARTMENT /,~ ' `~ "~`~j/1(~EO ~ y~~,` POST OFFICE BOX 474H, CI,EARWA'ITR, FLOwDA 33758-474H ~'~7"'C'1!'v MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE,, CI,FARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 6, 2006 Mr. Michael M. English WilsonMiller, Inc. 1101 Channelside Drive, Suite 400N Tampa, FL 33602 Re: FLD2006-02010 (940 Court Street) -Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. English: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-02010. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufGciency on Thursday, March 30, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the. second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, i. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft@,myclearwater.con: PRANK HIBI3ARI~, MAYUK 13u.i. JonsoN, Vice:-MnvoR John I)OItAn, COUn(:Il.~lli.~llfl?K Horn Hnmui:roN, CUUNCILAII?A7111?N ® CNtl.l?n A. 1'ereRSi:n, Counc:n ~u:ansrR ~~1:QUAI. F,MPLOYMI{N'I' ANI~ AI'I~IRMA'L'IVE. A(. PION I:MPLO}'~ili" • • r~'r~~~. Lov r„f`; ,~A ---.~..~j,- °~ ~ i~_~-~ ~ ~ I T Y O F C L E A R W A T E R Q, ~,, ~~~,0~,~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT „~~ ~gTER~; ~'' POS7' OFFICE BOX 474H, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-474 r~iii>f~ MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTFI MYRTLE AVIiNUIi, CLI:ARWA"1'ER, FLORIDA 33756 ~TELBPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT IZIiVIIiW February 27, 2006 Mr. Michael M. English WilsonMiller, Inc. 1101 Channelside Drive, Suite 400N Tampa, FL 33602 Re: FLD2006-02010 (940 Court Street) -Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. English: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-02010. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Application Section E, Stormwater Plan Submittal Requirements, has not been completed as an aclrnowledgment of stormwater plan requirements was not made. 2. Application Section G, Site Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the site plan shall include the following: ^ All dimensions; and ^ All required site triangles. 3. Application Section G, Site Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the site data table shall include the following: ^ Land area expressed in both square feet and acres; and ^ Total paved area expressed in both square feet and percentage of area. 4. Application Section G, Site Plan Submittal Requirements, states that for development over one (1) acre the following additional information shall be provided on the site plan: ^ Streets and drives (dimensioned); and ^ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned). 5. Application Section H, Landscape Plan Submittal Requirements, states that the landscape plan (i.e. sheet LP-101) shall include the following: ^ Names of abutting streets; ^ Delineation and dimension of all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing; ^ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations including driplines (if no trees exist on the adjacent property, a notation to this effect will suffice); and ^ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labled. PRANK f ~11313ARD, MAYOR Bu-LJoNSON, Vi<:r:-Mnvoi< JonN Do~aw, COI~M:IL~iF..~113F.R I~Ol'I' }jAD111a'ON, COIINCII,M ItP7131i1t ® Cnitu{N A. PrI'Ii RtiliN, CUU NCILAtI:,AIBLR ~~11QUAI. LMI'LOYMIiN'I' AND AI~PIRMA'I'IVIi ACTION LMPLOI'I?R~~ • • 6. Application Section I, Building Elevation Plan Submittal Requirements, states that building elevation drawings shall include colors and materials. 7. Application Section K, Traffic Impact Study, has not been completed as an acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements was not made. Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by • Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, March 6, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.te~ft(a~myclearwater.com CJ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 • Clearwater FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: February 27, 2006 To: Michael English, WilsonMiller, (813) 223-0009 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-02010 - 940 Court Street (Residence Inn) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via a-mail at: robert.tefft cr myclearwater.corre ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** ~ ~ Feb. 27 2006 12:3aPM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 ND. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132230009 Feb. 27 12:29PM 01'03 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADtJANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-I~0-HELP-FAX C435-7329). ~rJ r ~~ I ~~J ~ ~~~i~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ Page 1 of .1: 24-Feb-2006 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property f~ppraiser 14:59:07 ^wnership Information Hon-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SEHIOR CITI2EHS SERVICES ^BK: 04487 ^PG: 0617 940 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756-5745 EVAC: Han-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prap Rddr: 940 C OURT ST of Jan 1, 2005, based an Census Tract: 259.02 2[103 2x04 - : sales from 0 Sale ^ate ^R BaoklPage Price.{quallUnq) VaclImp Plat Information 0 11,976 4,4871 6 17 62,500 (U} I 1927: Bask 020 Pgs 026- 0 10 0/ 0 0 ~ } .1917: Book 001 Pgs 016- 0 10 0/ 0 0 ~ } 0000: Bask Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ~ } 2005 Value E~CEMRTI^NS JustlMarket: 1,293,000 Homestead: HO ^wnership t .000 Gaut Exem: HO Use X: .000 RssessedlCap: .1,293,000 Institutional Exem: YES Tax Exempt ;C: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information ^istrict: CWD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dey Bd View: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x ^epth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: .00 1) 0 x 0 8. 00 92, 321. 00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-^ur-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 . 00 ~} 0 x 0 . 40 . DO Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 31, 338.70 Short Legal CUACHMAH HEIGHTS REU BLK C, LOTS 1, 11 & 12 & S ^escriptian 1/2 OF UAC HAUEH ST OH H & THAT PT OF LOTS 2, 3, 13, http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=15+29+15+16830+003+0010&0=1 2/24/2006 Division of Corporations ~ • Page 1 of 2 ,,;,~-~~ .:r~,r1.;- ~,,.., ~U~~LC ~11t.~tilr~ Florida Non Profit SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 940 COURT STREET CLEARWATER FL 33756-5745 Changed 04/27/2004 MAILING ADDRESS 940 COURT STREET CLEARWATER FL 33756-5745 Changed 04/27/2004 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed 701635 590938570 11/07/1960 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE NONE Registered Agent ~ Name & Address ~ WITTENBERG, ROBERT W EX. DIR 1726 PENNY LANE CLEARWATER FL 33756-3682 Name Changed: 02/23/2005 Address Chaneed: 04/27/2004 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title NSTICE, WILLIAM G 1912 CLEVELAND STREET PD CLEARWATER FL 33765-4309 US GALATAS, SHIRLEY H 1732 BRENTWOOD VD CLEARWATER FL33756-4606 US KOCH, ROBERT M DR. 21 PELICAN PLACE http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&nl =70163 5&n2=NAMFWD&n3=... 2/24/2006 Division of Corporations ~ ~ Page 2 of 2 BELLEAIR FL 33756-1512 I VD LEE, J 2324 ASHFORD COURT STD DUNEDIN FL 34698-2222 US WITTENBERG, ROBERT W 1726 PENNY LANE D CLEARWATER FL 33756-3682 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2003 04/11/2003 2004 04/27/2004 2005 02/23/2005 - - ~_, _ ._ _.r.~_ „.~ ~_ Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing $. _ r No Events No Name History Information .Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 02/23/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/27/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/11/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 01/25/2002 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 01/10/2001 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 01/29/2000 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 03/03/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/27/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/24/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT 02/08/1996 -- 1996 ANNUAL REPORT THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT C~orpor~~tti©ns Inquiry ~ Corl~oratiozis ~--~o}p http://www. sunbiz. org/scripts/cordet. exe? a 1=DETFIL&n 1=70163 5 &n2=NAMF WD&n3 =... 2/24/2006 ~ ! CDB Meeting Date: May 16, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-02010 Agenda Item: D. 2. Owners: Senior Citizens Services Applicant: The Clarkson Group Agent: Michael M. English, WilsonMiller, Inc. Addresses: 940 Court Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development request to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, and to allow four parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. CURRENT ZONING: Downtown (D) District. CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Central Business District (CBD). CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Town Lake Residential. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Social and Community Center. .Proposed Uses: Overnight Accommodations (115 units). EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North: Downtown (D) District -Assisted Living Facility, and City Park. South: Downtown (D) District -Office, and Vacant. East: Downtown (D) District -Retail Sales and Services, Office, and Attached Dwellings. West: Downtown (D) District -Vacant. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The subject property (approximately 2.22 acres) is located on the north side of Court Street, between South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. The property is within the Downtown (D) District and is more specifically situated within the Town Lake Residential character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The subject property presently consists of three single-story masonry buildings and accessory surface parking lots. The surrounding area consists of a variety of uses including offices, retail sales and services, attached dwellings, an assisted living facility, and Prospect Lake Park. Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 1 ~ ~ Development Proposal: The development proposal consists of the demolition of the existing on-site improvements and the construction of a 115-unit hotel with accessory swimming pool and surface parking. Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for overnight accommodations within the Town Lake Residential character district is 40 units per acre. Therefore, the 2.22-acre subject property can accommodate 88 overnight accommodation units. However, the development proposal consists of 115 overnight accommodation units. Based upon the above, the applicant has requested the use of 20 dwelling units (in the form of 27 overnight accommodation units) from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool as made available by the Plan. The development proposal's compliance with the requirements for this additional density from the Pool is discussed later in the staff report. Building Heim Pursuant to Section 2-903, the maximum allowable height within the Downtown (D) District is 100 feet. However, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan permits those properties within the Town Lake Residential character district a maximum height of only 75 feet. The proposed hotel development will have a building height of 67 feet to roof deck and approximately 74 feet to top of parapet. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan with regard to height. Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Section 2-903, parking is required to be provided at a rate of one space per unit for overnight accommodations. Based upon the above, the 115-unit hotel requires 115 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 119 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking requirement. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The plans submitted incorrectly depict the required sight visibility triangles where the driveways intersect South Prospect and Ewing Avenues as well as where the various rights-of- way intersect one another. It has been attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a Development Order that site and landscape plans are revised to correctly depict the sight visibility triangles. There are four proposed parking spaces that encroach within the sight visibility triangles on the north and south sides of the driveways intersecting South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. While these parking spaces themselves will not encroach into the sight visibility triangle in a manner conflicting with Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, when the parking spaces are in use, the visibility will be impacted and the sight visibility triangles reduced from 20 feet to approximately 15 feet. The applicant has requested that the sight visibility triangles are reduced accordingly. From the perspective of the driver within a vehicle stopped at the stop bar on Ewing Avenue, there will be between 60 and 80 feet of visibility, while under similar circumstances on South Prospect Avenue, there will be visibility in excess of 100 feet. Granting the reductions will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances. It is noted that the City's Engineering Department has indicated support for this request. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to reducing the sight visibility triangles as set forth in Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 2 ~r s unless such undergrounding is not practicable: All on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are required to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. A notation has been provided on the Site and Utilities Plan that states "all proposed utilities shall be installed underground." This notation must be amended to include the undergrounding of the existing utilities and has been attached as a condition of approval. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1 of the Community Development Code, one (1) interior tree is required for every 150 square feet of required interior greenspace. As the development proposal requires 4,874 square feet of interior greenspace a total of 32 interior trees are required. However, only 28 interior trees are proposed. It is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a Development Order the landscape plan is revised to provide a minimum of four additional interior trees, or palm equivalent. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the provision of a 15-foot by 10-foot refuse enclosure adjacent the northwest corner of the building. The proposed solid waste facility has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Town Lake Residential character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that intense commercial and office development may be permitted along major streets such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and Myrtle Avenues, and Cleveland, Court and Chestnut Streets. The Plan further states that commercial development on the major streets should be constructed with abuild-to line close to the street and parking/service areas located to the rear. Public Amenities Incentive Pool: To assist in the transformation of downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non- residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of 20 dwelling units (in the form of 27 overnight accommodation units) from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision. of streetscape :improvements- within the -Court -Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing A enue rights-of--way as well as on. the subject property- where conflicts with Florida Department~of Transportation (FOOT) right-of--way would have prevented the installation of some improvements. Iii all cases the streetscape improvements proposed are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the provision of the above referenced amenities, which are consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the request for 20~ dwelling .units (in the form of 27 overnight accommodation units) from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool can be supported. Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ^ Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. The development proposal consists of the provision of 115 overnight accommodation units along one the Downtown's major vehicular corridors in Court Street, which is also the primary means of access to the beach. As such, the establishment of 115 overnight accommodation units on the subject property will attract visitors for Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 3 • both business and tourism to the Downtown area. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Goal. ^ Objective lA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the Downtown Design Guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. As previously stated, the development proposal will provide for 115 overnight accommodation units along a major Downtown vehicular corridor. The provision of these units will further the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and will be consistent with the Town Lake Residential character district, the Design Guidelines, and the Downtown (D) zoning district. Based. upon the above, a positive finding can be made with regard to this Objective. ^ Objective lE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. The proposed 115-unit overnight accommodation development (hotel) will provide for increased employment opportunities on the subject property over what currently exists. There is also the reasonable expectation that the visitors attracted for business and tourism through the development will patronize existing Downtown businesses and help create demand for additional services in the Downtown area, both of which would likely result in increased employment opportunities. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with regard to this Objective. ^ Objective 2I: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscape improvements within the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus a positive finding can be made with regard to this Objective. ^ Policy 1: The Downtown Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. As discussed in greater detail below, the development proposal is consistent with the various aspects of the Downtown Design Guidelines including, but not limited to: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking, Pedestrian Circulation/Access, Orientation, Mass and Height, Rhythm/Spacing, Architecture, Primary and Corner Facades, Secondary Facades, Materials and Color. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with regard to this Policy. ^ Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. Pursuant to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, intense commercial development may be permitted along major streets such as Court Street with such development to be constructed close to the street and parking/service areas located to the rear. The development proposal is in compliance with this vision; therefore a positive finding can be made with regard to this Policy. ^ Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The site has been designed with the building located approximately 30 feet from the Court Street property line; however this distance is reduced to roughly two feet when measured to the porte cochere, which has been designed to encourage and facilitate pedestrian interaction with the building and hotel use. In addition, the lobby windows (those beneath the porte cochere) give the appearance of "storefront" windows, which adds to the creation of a meaningful pedestrian environment. Shed-style, burgundy fabric awnings will be provided over those ground level windows that are not beneath the porte cochere. Further, the site Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 4 • incorporates substantial landscaping between the building/parking areas and the Court Street right-of- way as well as streetscape improvements along the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way. Based upon the above, a positive #inding can be made with regard to this Policy. ^ Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize 20 dwelling units (in the form of 27 overnight accommodation units) from the Pool. The development proposal will provide for streetscape improvements within the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan in exchange for this additional density. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with regard to this Policy. Town Lake Residential District Policies: A review of the policies was conducted, and no policies were found to be applicable to the development proposal. Downtown Design Guidelines: The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. A review of these guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items were identified: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the location, number and design of driveways shall maintain the urban fabric of the downtown and that it is appropriate for vehicular access to occur from secondary street frontages. The subject property presently consists of two curb cuts along Court Street and one along Ewing Avenue as well as access to a curb cut along South Prospect Avenue via cross access with the abutting property to the north. The development proposal will eliminate both of the curb cuts along Court Street; relocate the curb cut along Ewing Avenue; and establish a new curb cut along South Prospect. Based upon the scale of the development, the number of curb cuts is adequate to serve the site while not being excessive so as to be inconsistent with the fabric of the downtown, and the location and design of the curb cuts will improve upon the existing urban fabric of the downtown and will be consistent with the manner in which curb cuts have been previously approved in the downtown. Further, the elimination of the curb cuts along Court Street (the primary street frontage) and the utilization of South Prospect and Ewing Avenues for access is consistent with the Guidelines. In addition to the above, the Guidelines also state that joint/common access driveways between sites are appropriate. The existing site has a common driveway along South Prospect Avenue with the adjoining property to the north. This driveway, however, has a nonconforming width of 43 feet that is roughly centered along the common property line without a cross access easement, and appears more likely to be the remnants of the previously vacated Haven Street right-of--way than an actual driveway. The development proposal will reduce the width of the existing common driveway to a conforming 24 feet, with this driveway now serving only the property to the north. Anew driveway will be created approximately 20 feet to the south of this driveway (when measured at the property line), which will be separated by a landscape buffer and will provide the primary access to the subject property. The retention and utilization of the existing common driveway is not feasible in this scenario based upon the Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 5 • • nonconformities that exist with the common driveway, such as the turning radius and the aforementioned width. Also, the turning radius necessary for the drive aisle on the subject property to connect to the common driveway would result in the loss of a substantial area of land where parking could otherwise be provided. The City's Engineering Department has reviewed the plans and supports the applicants' request to not utilize the common driveway. The Guidelines further state that parking lots shall be located behind the primary facade of the principle building. However, the Guidelines also state that parking lots adjacent to rights-of--way shall be screened by a landscape buffer, solid wall, or fence that is three feet in height. The subject property is such that it is nearly impossible for all parking to be located behind the primary facade of the principle building; however a substantial amount of the parking has been located accordingly and all of the parking will be located behind either a three foot high landscape buffer or solid wall. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guidelines. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways should be provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. As noted previously, the development proposal consists of a porte cochere along the primary facade that will encourage and facilitate pedestrian interaction with the building and hotel use from Court Street. Also, the proposal includes several walkways within the parking area that are defined through the use of pavers. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guideline. Buffering and Screening; The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The development proposal locates its service facilities (i.e. trash holding area) within the interior of the site off the northwest corner of the building. The service facilities, as well as the adjacent swimming pool mechanical equipment, will be within asix-foot high concrete block enclosure with a decorative precast cap. The enclosure will be stuccoed and painted to match the principle building and will be tied into the abutting swimming pool enclosure, which will have intermittent columns consistent with the service facilities enclosure. The mechanical equipment for the development, with the exception of the aforementioned swimming pool equipment, will be located on the roof of the building and screened by the proposed parapet walls. With regard to wireless communication facilities, it has been attached as a condition of approval that any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guidelines. Fences and Walls: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. As noted previously, the development proposal includes the provision of a solid wall to screen a parking area from view along aright-of--way. The wall is located along the east side of the property adjacent to Ewing Avenue and will consist of a precast stone base and precast cap. The base will match the veneer on the base of the principle building, while the stucco between the base and cap will be painted to match accent features of the principle building. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guideline. Orientation: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall be orientated toward the street; thus contributing to pedestrian interest in the area. The subject property abuts three rights-of--way, Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 6 • thereby making it quite difficult to create a building that is orientated toward each street. As such, the proposed building has been oriented toward the primary abutting right-of--way (Court Street), and designed to take advantage of this location by providing a porte cochere along this primary facade that will encourage and facilitate pedestrian interaction with the building and hotel use. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guideline. Coverage: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that it is appropriate to locate a building farther from a build-to line in order to provide for courtyards, steps, entryways, arcades, plazas or other pedestrian oriented design features that maintain the build-to line. As discussed previously, the development proposal locates the majority of the building facade approximately 30 feet from the Court Street property line; however this distance is reduced to roughly two feet when measured to the porte cochere, which has been designed to encourage and facilitate pedestrian interaction with the building and hotel use. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Mass and Height: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mass and height of a building should be influenced and augmented by design features such as columns, awnings, arcades, step backs, doors and windows, and horizontal features. Perhaps the most significant design element of the building with regard to mass is the building footprint. Specifically, the building has been designed in more or less a "U" shape. This enables the "wings" of the building to effectively step back from Court Street, while still having a presence on the road as well as the adjoining South Prospect and Ewing Avenues. In addition, the design of the building incorporates several of the design elements suggested in the Guidelines such as columns spanning from the building base to the parapet that emphasize the verticality of the building; awnings above those ground level windows not beneath the porte cochere on the front elevation; recesses between 2.5 feet and 5.5 feet along all of the building elevations; and a rounded precast stringcourse that provides emphasis to the width of the building (horizontal feature). Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Rhythm/Spacin~ The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The proposed building clearly distinguishes each of these three sections from one another through color and the use of horizontal stucco banding and rounded precast banding (stringcourses). The "base" of the proposed building consists of the ground level and is distinguished through its dark wall color, porte cochere, and decorative horizontal stucco banding as well as by the projection/depth of columns. The "middle" and "cap" of the building have slightly similar colors; however those colors found on the "cap" are typically lighter than those on the "middle". The two sections are clearly separated by horizontal stucco banding and rounded precast banding (stringcourses). Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Architecture: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that new development should incorporate an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood. However, the Guidelines also state that diversity in architectural styles is encouraged and new buildings may use a variety of architectural styles as appropriate to the intended use of the building. The applicant has indicated that the building is of the International style of architecture as derived from the Bauhaus School of Design. Further, the detail and scale are expressed through Art Deco elements, while the overall height and expression of the building is that of Parisian scale. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Primary and Corner Fagades: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the primary facades shall be the most highly designed facades and utilize plane changes (i.e. projections and recesses), architectural details, variety in color, material and textures, and storefront display windows for retail uses. Further, the Guidelines state that buildings on corner lots shall emphasize their prominent location through the Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 7 • • use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. The dimensions/configuration of the subject property does not lend to building directly on either corner of the property; however the proposal is consistent with the Guidelines in that the building maximizes the allowable height within the Town Lake Residential character district and through the design of the building, which will present a unique appearance within the downtown. As previously discussed, the building has been designed in more or less a "U" shape with the primary facade of the building located along Court Street with columns spanning from the building base to the parapet, rounded precast and stucco stringcourses, recesses between 2.5 feet and 5.5 feet, and a porte cochere. In addition, the architecture includes lobby windows (those beneath the porte cochere) that give the appearance of "storefront" windows, and substantial variation in colors that in combination with one another create a highly designed primary facade. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Secondary Facades: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the level of design along a secondary facade shall be consistent with that of the primary facade with regard to architectural style, materials, finish, color and detail. As with the primary facade along Court Street, the secondary facades facing Ewing Avenue and the north property line have been designed with columns spanning from the building base to the parapet, rounded precast and stucco stringcourses, recesses between 2.5 feet and 5.5 feet, and substantial variation in colors that create a highly designed appearance. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Roof Designn: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that roofs shall be consistent with the style of the building utilizing elements such as cornices, overhangs with brackets, stepped parapets, richly textured materials, and/or differently colored materials. The proposed building consists of a flat roof with a cohesive mixture of parapet designs that include a variation of a stepped parapet, an outward leaning parapet, and a standard parapet with a rounded precast banding. This mixture of parapet designs is consistent with the International style of the building. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Materials: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that building materials shall be consistent with and relate to the architectural style of the building. The majority of the building base exterior consists of a precast stone with stucco accents at the building ends. The exterior of the upper levels consists of stucco with rounded precast stringcourses as accents. The use of the precast stone and stucco is consistent with the International style of the building. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The color scheme for the development proposal includes the use of a green-grey (Stone Harbor, Benjamin Moore 2111-50) for the porte cochere, columns and parapet; a grey (Thundercloud Grey, Benjamin Moore 2124-40) for the majority of the upper level building facade and as accents on the porte cochere; an off-white (Wedding Veil, Benjamin Moore 2125-70) for portions of the upper level building facade; a rust (Old Chicago) for the precast stone for the ground level building facade; and a sand (Coral) for the rounded precast banding. The proposed color scheme is appropriate for the architectural style of the building. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 8 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Density Overnight Accommodations 115 units X~ (40 units per acre) (51.83 units per acre) Height 75 feet 67 feet X Parking Spaces Overnight Accommodations 1 19 parking spaces X (1.0 s ace er unit - 115 s aces) ~ See above discussions regarding Density and the Public Amenities Incentive Pool for further information. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle Avenue, N/A N/A south of Drew Street and north of Court Street. b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design N/A N/A and appearance. 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes. X 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by N/A N/A all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. 4. The design of al] buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines X in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Applicability Standards as per Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 9 ~ ~ SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The 2.22-acre subject property is located within the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category and the Downtown (D) District and is further located within the Town Lake Residential character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The applicant has worked with Staff over the past several months to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The proposed development will further the City's goals of improving the character of the area and promoting private sector investment within the Downtown. Further, the development proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, General Applicability Standards, as well as the Downtown Design Guidelines. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 30, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the request to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, and to allow four parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 2.22-acre subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Town Lake Residential character district; 3. That the development proposal includes the demolition of the existing sociaUcommunity center as well as all other existing improvements on the site; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the encroachments to the sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Avenues will neither adversely affect the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, nor result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances; 2. That the use of 20 dwelling units (in the form of 27 overnight accommodation units) from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Town Lake Residential character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development criteria as per Section 2- 903.C of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code. Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 10 • Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan is revised to provide a minimum of four additional interior trees, or palm equivalent; 2. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the site and landscape plans are revised to correctly depict the sight visibility triangles; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions are addressed; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Department conditions are addressed; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the provision of wheel stops where the front of a parking space abuts either the screen wall along Ewing Avenue or any of the hedges across the balance of the site; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the parking being placed "on grade" or root pruning being performed at the back of curb with regard to the large tree (tree #45) at the southeast corner of the site; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided depicting the location of all proposed light fixtures/poles on the site and landscape plans in a manner that meets the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised plans must be provided with a notation that states "all existing and proposed utilities shall be installed underground"; 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees are paid; 10. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not limited to electrical and water meters, is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 11. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscape improvements within the Court Street, South Prospect Avenue and Ewing Avenue rights-of--way are installed pursuant to the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan and to the satisfaction of Staff; 12. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 13. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 14. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 15. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 16. That aright-of--way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of--way, and that separate right-of--way permits are obtained for all paver brick sidewalks along City streets; 17. That any overnight accommodation units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not constructed are returned to the Pool; 18. That if the conditions of approval associated with this development are not met, then the incentives gained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool shall be returned to the Pool; Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 11 19. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by May 16, 2007); and 20. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff:`'d~~• `/~~~ Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ^ Application ^ Location Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Future Land Use Map O Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S.•IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBICourt Street 940 Residents Inn (D) - OS-16-06 (R7)ICourt St 940 -Staff Report OS-16-06.doc Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 12 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft(n,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02010 -Page 13 ~ ~ O ~~D ~L~ ^ ^o as ~~ oQo ~ ~ C~ Lff Sf C C = OEEORfpl1 ~ ~p S7 PLA7A Sf 2 < ~ ~ '~~H RD ^ZWZ^ ^ O .ZONES ^^® 5 Si ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ^o~ac^^ ~ ~ _ ORPN ~ aaa~~~ I D ~ ca D;~ b Sf ~ S.R. 590 ^~~~^ ST ~~~~~^<~~~g a g a a ~oo ~ o va ~ S R 60 ~ ^ ^ o ^ . . ^~ W~] CLEVHIHD ST ^~~ ~ gT D~^ PROJECT ~ -- ~^~~~ ~ RERDE O ~ ~ll o ~~ ^ ^ ~ Q' ~ N _ %~ x ~ gT SITE ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~SQZ1'~< _ 37 ~ ~ T ~ p® ^ ~ ^[~~ 3 ~o a~~ ST is GOUID Sf ~ ^ C~ ^ ~ JA ROSH BROWNaI ST ^ ^ ~ ~°`~ Qa a 0`^ ~~ DHESINVf - ^ a ~ o o ^ ROGERS ST u 3 a. a W., ~ ~ HN10U1 _~~b ~w.,,_ ~~ PPIE P~ ~ Cr ^ ~ Oecti ~ y T~~ ST O4 ~ a ^ ~~ PNE d m ~ PME Sf a ~ .~^ 9 ~ ', ~u x %NE = G ^ ~ ^ S S 3 IXtIAD RD ~ W DRUID RD I - ~ a ~ O 4 ~ ~^ g DRUID ^ ^ ^ C _ s WA e g ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ MAONONA ~a ~ oRR a ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ (`~ G, ^ ~ IXi ~ ~~ ~ y ~ W a ~ P ~ ~ 1 L K~ K ~ 5 OTUS PATH LOTUS PATH lolUS PATH ~ ipN ~ ^ ^ ~ .EFFORDS ~,:e %~ ^ Si (',''EF~FO'-R-D~S w((~-''--S--T~~ ^ ^G^ ^ ~ .. a 5~~~ ~ R100?R ~ ~ PW 7VSDOLA 3T UilAS ~ a+r ~ ~ W47KN5 t WATKNS " 1 TUSKAWILU ST T~y,yb C 3 m x I COfBEff SSA gi. A ~ ^ ^~ ~ 920WHING ~m Location Map Owner. Senior Citizens Services, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02010 Site: 940 Court Street Property Size Acres : 2.21 Atlas Pa e: 287A PIN: 15-29-15-16830-003-0010 • • i ` ,~ , ~ . _,,~d _., J ~ V,~ N 1 ~ '~ r { ;1 `~ ~ J,~ ~./ t y-... ~1. ~.~ ~/ `~=` r ~.. - . 1 I -- - ' n r~ y ~,. ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ T1 .: ~: ^ ~J~ ~ ~1 -? ~ J ~.~t~ ~~ ~~"_ 'mil ` ~P~ ~ ~~~.. _. - . Y ri' ., rJ i - ~ , . A ~ ~ 1~ I~~ i ~ i :111 k t' ~ t ~~ i ~r_. W M -~~ ~ wr ? • ~ ~ I ~ . ~ w ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ - _ -~. ~ . ~' '-` ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '' ..F~ Aerial Map Owner: Senior Citizens Services, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02010 Site: 940 Court Street Property __- . ____ _ __ ___ Size1Acres): 2.21 Atlas Page: 287A PIN: 15-29-15-16830-003-0010 _ _ • • ~, ~ r r- ~ ~ I --~ , 1 r_I 1 r ~--- ~ 203 ~ ~ 1 I --- ~ I 4 ~ I L_i _1 - - ~~ 7 I 1 I I j r ---~ 4 I I ~---~`-------------~ 205 ~------- 1 N ,r 1 I m m I 210 ~T 214 204 208 ~ 215 I S ~2 ; 209 ; ; 2os CBD r-- -----~ i~ _~ I ~ 226 Q ~ 21i 2f0 L------1 ~ --- Q-~ CBD-----1 211 ;~ Z 213 ~ 212 15 I I I ------ -------------1 --~- 1 I I. 1 I --z i-' ~ , I I .1 303 CBD I I 317 - ~--" -- L_ I I i ~ ----- _ I 1 1 305 ~ - ~-------~ I 1 ---IT--"~00 I 1 I 3119--- D r---t l ~ L-- _ _ I __7 321 ~ -- W l_ ~ --~..-_-- ON I ~ o ro ; --_-l I 1 40T r--- 1404 1 ! Q 1--- 1 - I I I ~--- 408 ~ ~5 -.._~- 000RT ST V __ ~ _~ i 411 ~ 1 i 4oe __I 407 W U ..^` ~ I~ ~ 1~ p~~p~~~~cc,oo,, I ~ ~~ ~ ` ~i " iT I 1 i I 4 ` _ ~~ + ~ i_J ~ 413 415 -~ ~~ I Z ~. Y 421 "Q ,_ 423 ,- ~ ~, ~~-g --J ~ ~ B~ ~ t__ - ~I 1 ~~~ w 1 Z ~'T" ~~ ~ ~ I o = o ~ ~~D ~ @ ~ ~ ~ °CBD $ ~_' ~ ~_~' ; L_ ~ CBD --- - J CHESTNUT ST ~ , ~ I I KKAAY CAD ; ~ °' °' = i y ;£-~-_ I ~ 1 I---~ ~--,_ - ---~ I ; ~ ~ ---- --- -- o 0 o o ., 1--- ~ 5071/2_x! ' i l i ~ I P ~~ o ®(~ -- _7- --I ~ --- I ~ 5RB I4 M ~-- -J ---- -- - Future Land Use Map Owner. Senior Citizens Services, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02010 Site: 940 Court Street Property Size Acres : 2.21 Atlas Pa e: 287A PIN : 15-29-15-16830-003-0010 • I I _ _' r- I ~l I- r-1 I I r I ~3 '-"------------Oi I I I --- ~ 1 ~ I L_~ _I 1 I 1 i ---- `----' I j r---I ~ I Y ~/ ---I r'` ~ '~_-_----'---- ~ _ ------- 1 r-~-- 4- I 1 j , I - --- 205 ~ 1 ~ ~ I 1 l a a I i m I~ 1 I m m I 210 214 207 204 206 1205 I FRANKLIN ST j 208 i i 2oa z 1 zz 1 1- r~ \ _____~ i~ ~ I I 300 I 22B ~ 21 f 210 L______I I I--------- ^------ ~ 304 211 Z -_ -'-i ~ ~ 1 I~ i--- L-- 213 212 315 1 ~------ --= ------------'-J , ~ ~ I 1 I 1 1 1 _z s_~ 3.73 I ~__ 317 -'-- - !..___~-~---J 1 : ~ _ I i I----'---' 305 :--- ---IT---'{00 ~ I I 3719--" r---~ ~ I __l 321 ~---_ 1 1 404 ----7 407 I `--~-m --~---- ~ W ~ i --- ~ r 1--- ~ --- ~ 408 _ ~ ^- ~05 couRr sr D h ~ i ~ 1 ~ ' ~ -- ~ ; I I I 406 _ _ 407 W j j 4 ~, 17 ~ I __I 0 ~ L-- ~ 1 -, ~n in -a _F .- ~m.,~h m ~ I~ m ~m ~ ~ m oo ~ ~ ~ V} Q ~^:. - r1 ..~ ~ -499 j _ ~ a ~ \' \'\ _ ~- ~ ~ 413 415 --. ~ ~ , I I - ~ ~i I - ~ 4191 1 ~~~ ----- 1 -- 4 Y 421 `~O 423 1 jai ~__ i 40B - 1 I t ~ i W o --J I I r-- _ I I 1 ! ~ Z L9~ ' o.- i i ~ I i I o ' i = „' H 1 ~ L ~0 I ~ I ~ 0 °- ~ I L~ ° `_J ~ _ -- - J CHESTNUT ST ~ ~ ~ °p ,. _ ---, °rn i~ I ~ rn a _____- of a- j --_ ~ ~ 1--J a °o g .. .- i 1 ~ 4 ~~ _____ I' ~ __ ~ I l 1 W ^ _ 1 1 ti _-_-_ 1 1 I 1 I 1 ~ ~ j ~ ___ _ I ~__ 1 I 1 -- ' m r --- 1 _ o 0 L___ ~ 5071lA_r ~ ~ -- ' ~ g g ~ o MDR ~ ~ r-i -, ' ~---- ; 1 1 ' ~---! ------- Zoning Map Owner. Senior Citizens Services, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02010 Site: 940 Court Street Property Size Acres : 2.21 Atlas Pa e: 287A PIN : 15-29-15-16830-003-0010 L~ ;' r i ' ~ -J ~ --- I ~ r j ' I I tl--- ~ 203 ------------ ~ i -- I I ~ ~ ; ~ Retail Sales ~ _ _ ---- ~---~ ~ & Services ; ~ O I/ V r---~ I ' i S,ales Prospect ' ' ~--------------' , -----__ ~ ces ~ Vac ' S~ t Lak Par --- za5 ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ j lau m I 210 ~7 204 214 2D8 205 I - FRANKLIN ST ~z ~ zos i i aoe ~ I 1 r--~ _--_-~ t, ~ f I ~ 1 226 Q ~ 211 210 I-------I ~ --- I---------i ~------ Vacant ~ j 3oa ! ~{1 1''lSk~t~ ~iVin~ 1'--- j -- f7 I , Z 213 212 ~ 315 I ------ - -- --~ --'"------- ~. I i` $~~}~ ~ ~ 303 I ~__ 317 f I------'-t 305 i -- tt'---900 3}8-- ~ ~ ~1 ~ i --~ - ~a21 rsdle.S Ce p ~---` Services ~ __; 321 "---- N ~ o -'--, ttl ~ --- 407 1404 ' r Q '--- ~ 1 j I --- ~ 408 ' - ~t05 ~_~- couRT sr ; w ~ ~ 4oB ~ _- ; ~ ~ a ~~ ~ 411 I 1 407 ~ 1 - I ~ - ~ ;O ce ~ t a ~~ ` _, '~ %-I Atta hed Q ~ 413 415 -, I _t I - `-' y ~~ ~ ~ ~ L J We ~ 4171-~ I 41B ~ ----- __ Vacant tr~ _ z i ~~ 421-~a ° .. 42s ,~ :,, ~-- - et~i Sales ' ~ 1 _ _ 1 1 r-- - ~ Ce ~~ S}e yes ~ = m N I IN I p , ^ ~ I f L' ~ - - --- J CHESTNUT ST Z F` 'c _ rn L, __I ~i 8i a a t I ~7 ~ ~ i~ ~ `------ ~ i i~ ---- ~'--I e~ I ---' y j 1 I I---~ ~--t- ~n n ~ o r ~----' So71~~^ ~---- --- - I I I I --' - - i l i 8 S I ~~ -- o arj --I ~ --- I I ,~rQB I 1 ~_-- ~ ------ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Senior Citizens Services, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02010 Site: 940 Court Street Property Size Acres : 2.21 Atlas Pa e: 287A PIN : 15-29-15-16830-003-0010 • • :'_= =~ d. ,~,_. ,a> Looking north along I3wutg Avenue from Court Street L~x~king nottlteas~t at subject properh at from the interior of the subject property properh front 940 Court Street FLD2006-02010 the interior of the subject property subject property Looking north along east side of Ewing Avenue • • 940 Court Street FLD2006-02010 Looking south along east side of liwmg Avenue Looking northwest at subject property and adjacent property from interior of subject property Lcx~kins ~~est along suxitlt side of Court titreet Lcxkin_ ~~ est at svh_ject property from interior of subject 1~P~Y ^ r~ \_/ y ~Z ~ .Z7 ~O m ~ rp ~ m~ rn r~ ~ m s~ o Or~- '~ Q Q~ m m ~ Z SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR: DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA A DEVELOPMENT BY THE CLARKSON GROUP, LLC 3100 University Blvd. South, Suite 200 Jacksonville, Florida 32216 J ~ ,9 CLEARWATER ~ ~inJ PROJECT ~ \ ~ LOCATION ~ C V DREW 5T 590 ~ J IE E T Doug sT GULF-TO-BAY BLVD Z O to 60 DRUID RO ~ K = H < _ IAKEVIEW RD ~ ~ ~, ~ 2 U W o] BELLEAIR ~ o W BELLEAIft PD ~ w N t y LOCATION MAP SITF MAP ~Isa~nMillerDeslgn Planners • Engineers • Ecologists • Surveyors • Landscape Architects •Transportafion Consultants WilsonMiller, Inc. 1707 Channelaide Ddve, 6Wte LOON Tampa, Flodda 31602• Phone 073,723.9500 •Fax B13.223-0009 Wef3Slte 3vww.3nhonmllMrcom INDEX TO SHEETS SHEET N0. DESCRIPTION COVER SHEET LS-101 LS-501 SRE PLAN SITE DETAILS LP-101 PLANTING PLAN 1P-501 PLANTING DETALS LP-502 PLANTING NOTES AND SCHEDULE LDd01 TREE MITIGATON STATUS :REVISIONS PROJECT DESIGNER PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LEA D. DEL TOSTO, RLA b tt33 I GATE APRIL OT, 2006 CHECKED BY LEA DEL TOSTO , PROJECT NUMBER 05211-001-000 DATE INDEX NUMBER 04/07/2006 05277-Rev 01 au Ibn No. 1133 : ~ s s 4'X8' Inlerl 4tlnB Guncrete Pave Waeh SeMlDement M41nb ldnb t2.14• Sand Sattlnq Coane 6' ~ni Cancrote X000 P51 Wlih Fifer Mesh AsphaR 14• Bate F. E m- tr1' Expantbn Jdnl ~ - ~ 1 W- s6hnhad sWgraEe Fev so zxa Demrmee Reear IbP •al e.poaed wnaeb edee> W ba hand tooleE. PAVING HEADER DETAIL 1'd Yb11L9FVAllp1 tASI N III tDNO67F IEtN1Ki MW L wmlaoor~rtwrooa®soc ~~F GLEARWATER DETAIL X116 sult:I•- ra ~ ~a.~.e I- ~ :.. ~ s ~~ e~acwn~~wac el yr f OM mr«Ii IifNID71~11D ro am inol I •a -~ -~ waroasur~AarnMr mores iroKmaosoc wan~o rwmwwa wKt® n olio ~ner two wounro rora TM ~ a ~ ~ w iXfR~ ~~3~ wxs~ti w - cil wloeravKnr Iua-~Dtwlau- al~woirwalisurai~ Kounr aox wroset~erowauc ~uumasl~Itm TRASH RECEPTICAL suu~oealal zrwe yr. I•-0t ~ m~.g DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN gyn. GFARWAT6~ 0. ~A~ ~~ TIB QlI~00r1 ~ilOUp e~tmveunonwml: KBJ Architects, Ina. I Igor roit oorslrolnioll 1 HARDSCAPE' DETAILS LS-501 Eu U W a. O a x f- 0 _ ~ d ........ _ ~ - Q >Z _ _ _ 61 > W /\/\i ~- ~• I ~ V.UA eiPUGE OF HEDGE ~ ~ IS \ •~\\ uHLLUTIw+~fRO99W0.9lWD PEpE£ 11,, - OPTHELOM~,NIrDE,~OPMEHT ,, -- ~> \~t~ PERVIDU9 PAVEMFM \ I 30 POOi SHiHT N5lelurv munctF t~ ~ IN COOPERATION WRM; KBJ Architects, Inc. 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING KEY 0 \IV/i ~,~ MEDJOOL DATE PALM ~i/~1P~ ® O BIRD OF PARADISE VIBURNUM A sue: r=sD' DATE: APRIL 7, 2006 O LIVE OAK ® MUHLY GRASS PIN: osn t-oot-ooo O LOROPETALUM e DRAKE ELM O O HIBISCUS PLUMBAGO ~ PLANTING PLAN CHINESE FAN PALM ® JUNIPER NORTH LP-101 I I 2 I a I s t z -+- 2 3 4 5 Z ~ DOWNTOWN w w CLEARWATER ® ~ ¢ RESIDENCE ~~ ° Q~ INN Z W ~ w / Je D C / n v CLEARWATER R PREPARED FDR: O ~ z LL ~ The Clarkson Group '- n~• Z ~ ,~ ® - ~ ~ U PREPARED BY: ~IspnMi11er0esr n I I I I . a g -~ ~~... --~ 1 i W IIsD M ~~ r I e ,~ ~ ~ ,. . _.,o vw~T w.w~cilL woaio.m"' PARKING ANO INTERIOR IANDSCAPE AREA O \C VENILULM USf AREA ICONMERCIALk ~e.]M SF \ /- REOURfOVrtEPoOPlANOSGPEAREA(ID%j ~.e]B Sf PRONGED D11EPo00. VNOSCAPE AREA 11B] %j xB:B Sf J. REOUPED INIEPoOR SHRUB AREA 158 %k 2511 5F ~ AJ~ PRDNDEO INTENOR SHRUB APEA'(50.]%k 3.5185E - PPRWNGLALG]IATION: TOTAL REQUIRED: 115 SPACES TAL PROVIDED: 11B SPACES \ PARgNG 81NTEWOR LRNOSLOPE AREA 1 2 3 6 5 MR,\~~~ T =P msruunax. r~ ®~„~e~ ®M.~~.N.,..~.. c~ry,R Ox ISEE GMOixG ~ioRl aWi eNIREWiREMEMS} M~o~~M~sr,®,~ LARGE TREE PALM DETAIL ter.. Z mro etas wwra i roa~EV~*mn r~wrn~ ~tAs I GROUNDCOVER ORIGINAL RECEIVED QTR 0'7 2006 F CIS OF C EP,RWA ERj ~xT"~ + + + -# mrsensxr vum.rvcs. Ira X J X+ ,em "YY ~~ sons«vn + + + + + ruvrsoiarrox. moue h ~ gra~ste~rx aan aw ~ cvaaweoa. o. P.~~x.. TYPICAL PLANT SPACING wu:xmmuur ~~~ ~~ TM ~~ a I~E~~,~I ~P~ ~~ _ ;:,rr~ 1~~~4~~- n~cr msc. MULCH APPLICATION MULTI-STEM TREE wu: xo~%swa SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER uxei%rowu 1 ~ 1 I 3 I e I s DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT 6T. CLEARWATER. 0. PREPARED FOR: The Clarkson Group PREPARED BV: ~lsQnMil/erDes7ga u., Wilson~Mille~ ~-.~~.w VAOkCf WN,~GEM1 C IN COOPEMTION WITH: KBJ Architects, Inc. NOT FOR CONSrRUCT10N SCALE: NTS DATE: APRIL 7, 1006 PIN: 05211-001-000 PLANTING DETAILS LP-501 PLANTING NOTES D use a wn ca ere lumFSSlws+msrNStelNUmwltontr~nwYs xmcnl~I~:~0.~x~s:;ts~~HLUVm~uoo~isl5'¢m~n,s[°"ws p qua PUixbrt M.l~~t vm sAldtM iwrtx~ONi.ErtrtsOO*I~aalcowFa~au rsnmu~en~ xtAms¢~i. n¢uc155+~51 wsmew-¢r5nllu5[at se. v[n5iwla 5wa5nouES[a 5 rtouuvers mwn N i ciovnx npre ulmMSrwsu nx¢m5v[c~uunmviucE. LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE PLANTING KEY MEDJOOL DATE PALM ~~I~\ ,/O~ LIVE OAK DRAKE ELM CHINESE FAN PALM ® BIRD OF PARADISE Q VIBURNUM #~ MUHLY GRASS O LOROPETALUM O HIBISCUS O PLUMBAGO ® JUNIPER TREE PROTECTION zl .~5mrree..~w.nereo. ' HwaeMOOn ro nreE wn*~aerou~uuxax.~srE wnesso5ws5wse.ro~~oev*w cw.5v. rJ 9EmuEMAiIaN GW]EO BYSURin[EwASEP~ aV mE~r9~¢~ ~'~"~'EOIFMMx2aNES 5luls eE n~K.s ~AiECt¢ofwEOi eoa uraER R¢]immNSNNEH UnLlnF9 u1F 1o BEIroiuLED VniNN to iEEi s.l lui rA m5wc wu aE m5~ m ~ 5uus2o ms[ ssmnc4 d~nwo efl45oouExS. el xae ce>lauiEei~~ xn sxuye[oix ~xm taE6 on0erv~iroxs5wu~aw~e[fumws[Imwo i~ w5 Tree P/OtMIOn ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 : n a PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3 , CITY OF CIrEARWATER DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN Couar sr. CLEARWATER, FL PREPA0.ED FOR: The Clarkson Group ~Iso~~iller -morta M.w,wei 6~,,. IN COOPERATION WRH: KBJ Architects, Inc. r ~~~v~~- a ~~ wr II i10a0:'aEGR,S~"~.51~, ~ 1 2 3 4 5 LEGEND Treeto oSaveU DBM (Tree In it lcs Tree Reference Number Eztenl of Tree Campy Tma to Da RemweO DBH of Tree in kI lle9 Tree Reference Number Extent of Tree Canopy ~~Trce BeMgae ORIGINAL RECEIVED ASR ~'~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LANDSCAPE TABULATION: TREES RETAINED cAnoPr rrtEES.9 o-rn Ies wro,l PaL49-9 Pam Im xxnesl AL CREgr 115 in. TREES REMOVED wwPr mEE9-e m,. no, ~I vALNS ePam(ef imn®1 1921n. TOTPL DFBn TREES REQUIRED 192 115 TOTAL OEBR IiN.I TOTK OREpi PN.1 IN aeOUREO TTm TREES PROVIDED TYPE rota INOHE9 PRONGED TOTAL Inds PRONGED Ma EM 9! ~m , t5 io L mm.~ z.o ToTa-PRONGED 133.5 In. net lnwES ' 58.51n. PARI(ING AND IMERIOR IANOSCAPE AREA N]9O11LPR 119E AREA (cONNERGALk RfONPE0 a1rER10R LNi09UFE APfAl10%k 4er~SP RONGEO INn;PoOR LAN09GPE AREA IIan xk 9.0YJ 9F PMgNO CALCUTADON TOTAL REOVnEO. SPACf9 TOTAL PRONGED 1199PACE9 NOTE: Refer Lo landscape EelaB sheet for pmtet[iVe Cartier requhemenls. Refer Lo Ina sutaniNel package (noleCOOk) for the arborists tree eveluatlon. 4 ~ 5 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN CouRT sr. CLEARWATER, FL PREPARED FOR: The Clarkson Group PREPARED BY: ~IsQnMiller0es7gn ~~~ ls~E~Mw411erL »....,..., IN cooPERAnoN wrt1r: KBJ Arohiteets, Ina • TEA GEL T09T0, flOaN~REOarnnronen9f NOT FOR CONSTRUCNON SCALE: 1^=30' DATE: APRIL7, 2006 PIN: 05211-007000 TREE SURVEY LD-401 LLI Q _Z W NORTH It i i ORIGINAL RECEIVED ep~ ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT COLOR 3 STUCCO COLOR 1 STUCCO COLOR 2 STUCCO COLOR 3 STUCCO COLOR 2 STUCCO BASE PRECAST PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION ,> ~, COLOR 3 ROUNDED PRECAST COLOR 3 ROUNDED PRECAST COLOR 2 STUCCO STUCCO COLOR TO MATCH CANOPY FABRIC 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~R ~'~ 2006 SOUTH WEST ELEVATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~.~-,1~' • ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~R ~'~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NORTH EAST ELEVATION CIiY OF CLEARWATER ~~~ __ -- - - -p ~ --- ' ' sr-~e LL MI ~ A, _ ~ sr-~ SEYENIH 4i~~ 4VE N ?[ ~ ~ ~ . I T 9%M flcr,F~ - - - _ _- - _ _ - - - SIXM i, COP ~I ~~ ® Ir I m r. , IIm, II r~ ~ r , r II©II r. . - ]9~-__~ te 79'~-~, ® _ fFM R.?l: ~ ~ ~ iv 1 o . fI1Tl BOOR . i ~ " ~ - - ® - - - FOURtt . fF 1i... ~ - - - - ® ~ ~ - .. ~ r - - f011R1N Fif ~+ ZI 1 LI ~~ ® ® ~ '~9 © ~ L ~ ~ i Q ~ naRO n n- - -- - -~+ sra+n ~~ rv^P - - ~'~' vc~nNn n t~ NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ORIGINAL RECEIVED ,~PI~ ~'7 2~~6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ^"'~'^ CITY OF CLEARWATER • CITY OF CLEARWATER • ! ~ 1,.. ~ ~L_ ~YY -~ / ~ : ~ ~Y ~~ ~ T~ ~ ,, ~ ,. ,, I ~ ' ,~~, Z ~ I ~~ J I'C71C~.I ~ _- J - o U ~ ~ ~$ ~ II I ~. ~, , ,;_ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .~~ ,,~~' ~ - ~~ ~ ,' ~ ~, ~ .~ ,~ (~~ ~~ ~ ~s, ~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER pR ~ ~ 2006 P CITY OF CLEARWA ERj '^~ '- epR 0'~ 2006 PCIT! OF CLEARWA ERj ORIGINAL 1 Z 3 d 5 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT 5T. CIfARWATEft, Fl PREPARED FOR: The ClaFkson Group I PREPARED aV: ~ ~ ~ z I 3 I a gdWiIsonnMillo~. AO~ER MANAGED: IN COOPERATION WITH: KBJ Architect& Enc. ICE D D N G VE ~ 2125- 70 ORIGINAL RECEIVED COLOR 1 COLOR 2 THUNDERCLOUD GREY 212440 COLOR 3 STONE HARBOR 2111-50 CANOPY BURGUNDY EABR C BASE APR 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~.~ •'` _ ~... STONE BASE 0 D CH CASO ALL COLORS TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORS COLORS SAMPLES 1-3 • 3 ~ ~ ' ~ ~"' Y ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ .y ~'_~''~. 11. ~ ~~~ ~~iCi; '9c5y', + ~ .. a, ~, ti , ,.}~~-•~ ~.'M~fT'~ ~~ ~. a'~y`„~ ~~}-.I ~ ' '# ~,~Att' "kY ~ .3. : ~ ~~N a Q . ; e it • • 3f1Nd~N ONlM3 3if1N3~iV 103dSOdd Hl(lOS A P2 ~ 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV'/ATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 0 "~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV~/ATER ~Q s I Pt.AT GOOF; t, PAGE i6 PER CITY REQUIREMENTS CDC SECTION 3-911. EASE RICHi-OF-WAY UNE PER OCCUPATION 15' SANRARY SEWER EASEMENT FUS BEEN VACATED - PER OR BOOK 14829 PAGES 2257 ANO 2258 , N STOP SIGN, Rt.-1 $ HAVEN STREET a hRE NYD. ASSEMBLY - N.8B59'1 'W. UO OAS WP yACATED 6' tiiGH 5x6' COMPOUND METER AS: 3o.oa 5.88'5 '11"E. waoD FENCE w ~ s" 449.11' - a PAC 5 g• E CU g E 0 RB Yj 10 PAC 5 9' ~) 1" 10 PA S 9' ^ WA R • N Q ~ i t2' OF 2 P BAR ~ RET NING "' e^ H < ~ !-. OUMPSIER ENCLOSURE w 13i ~ ~_ 2 61' ~ i RE FlRE SERVICE N ~ 3~i a 20~ ~ ~ ~ v tit ~; L°26.9J' O f- ~a a ~I ~ C ~~ ~ 150' OF 6' P -900) 0_ ~ r~.ea ~) ~ E D CUR LL = W g o I1' a. ~ 3 i R - O i17 ~ " 27835. n ~ n - (n ~ ~O n •~ (:i)A,Ctitdnnf~: ,~;:iT;i. , ::I ,,,i ® ~~ Inn I „' 74' 5W. D - - -- _ . ~ PLAT OOF; 20, PAUL 26 4 2 PZo(0 I a I O yl ® ~•CS UG WP - m 1 :;., ~ _ c \TSB 8, t. ._..___ - _ Nm__. q CB OF 4• ~ -- ~,a ~. z C 0 ~} ~ ~ 58 MtiP lifff--~5` X33 G.G. q I .: u. P _ 1 0~ c ~R~ T W~ $ MfgO B, ~ ~ J I B -~ 8 ~ ~ VNES N 7&JZ qk ~I 9 ~ a PA n.. ,~ -_ ~~ IX. SANRARY MANHOLE~~ RIM: 24.54 o SEE LAND UW _ OR PLAZA AREA AILS •~ ~ , s \ ~ ~ C J~ >QO~ Vj I (RA PS \ F00T IND 304 'b ~J ~ "^~ 9 ~yGq{s, ~coN wr t ~ ~ s CB 4~ ~ HI (jyA z ~U ~~ Sy Y~ EMBaLnY ' S i 1~ R ® n.aes ~ •u'w. ts.DO' $ ^ 10. EX. 8' PVC WATER MAIN e t ~t 8' FlRE HYDRANT ~ E r o~ ' i ~ ( 10.00' I 6•x6• WETFAP 'Pr e " C TAP VALVE ~ .0' sO ~ . ~o " . SITE BENCHMARK j SET NAIL AND DISK IN NORDIEAST PARKNG AREA \ ^ ~ J ELEVATION s 29.45' J ~ P~t~ RE(AI HC WALL 7 ' { _ ~m 1S' RIGHT-OF-WAY PER 1 ~j n PUT J{ uat Ri:W: g, 16~^WIDE F, 0. ~OOK 7 P.C. EASEMENT 41, PAGE 848 ~ 9' - ~ s ~ ~ ~, W ~ SCALE 1'30' ~I a W~ r a e• is w ed o m _ a ~ 3 Q i6' . I ~ ~ SPAC ~ ~ ~ n m W o ~ ! ~ w 23.0 ' ~ 0 i Y 7~, 3` Z LL~ 'AJ a 3 aY 9' °R o Qz 23.D ' (SHADED) AHD \ ~ PB~r' ~~ N HEREON, PROP. CROSSWwJ( c ice- ~ t`~' OF 24 BAR )MMUNRY-PANEL \ ~(FI EE REM IOVEDTO ~ I/2105CAPE w .R 3, 200J. - D.0' 78.79' q ~ 3j 4 2~/ e 6 5 CES ®9' \ kAN OR oEf ) SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 -Y •~ 2 0' ~ 749CA ISSUED BY 1HY EFFECTNE DATE ~ lJ,. ~ 1 7 ~rotion (Progrma Energy) ~. ~ Oy, G~ /y ~ "" ' ~ a, z ~ GF\OG,p `9y '~ i Y ~~ o y i Iro6on (Progroaa Energ)r) ~Cj\ s :EON) O Z ~ \ C'P~C ~~ ~~~'~~~ _- _-_.-'-- •roean (Progrme Energy) T ~ ~ T O SIZE INFORMATION \ ~ ~ p_~ ~' ,-_'`-~_M'^ f~ C9 ~ ,' EON) r ~ ry~ pR~ERTY AREA 2.218 Ac (96,856 SF) ~~ xt of Porcel 1 oe rnenro0 IT Q rll V J BUILDING U~: HOT0. \ "9J (~~y, ~ _ ~ e 176. ~ ~ ~ m Z BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 11,884 eq. H. ~ `~3' mti _Oc;: bq~ z 10.00' THE PUBUC RECORDS OF ~ .ZT _O ~ r GROSS FLOOR AREA 81,439 nq. R \ \ == Nm •D-t ~ C7 F.A.R: O.B4 ~ \ bo 23. fT fll BUILDNG HEIGHT 67 feet O~ 3 ~ Z \ l-/ I ~ Vial --1 REWIRED PARKING 113 Rooma \ 1.0 PER ROOM 113 Sparoe '~ \ P I b PRONDFD PARKING: ~~.\ i i ~ 5TANOARO: 111 Spasm \ , ~j~ I RADIUS -308.58' MC PARKING $ $pyggQ TOTAL• 118 Spaces \ PS W a ARC 12.70' ~ 15.00' CHORD >• 12.70' ,,~~ L~' SB i C.B. - N.31'S3'48'W. TOTAL PAVED AREA 48,113 Sf (SOS of property area) '7~j s~,y ~ 1 SURVEY LEGEND \ .~5 a~~~~9 -~ S.LR. crr ,on., e..,. ..... IMPERMEABLE SURFACE RA110: 0.69 o ~- G ~~° 0 a ~~ oBso~~ >~~~ DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER LEGEND ABBFiEVIAT10N3 eoc Wa a clnR w Wa a anER EDP DE EME O PAKKNI pRAINAE EASEKNI LK LAE WINTENANFE FAEKNT K VIILITY EAEKMT CK EL w ELEY CDWIY VIILITY EAEKNT FLEYAT ION IM INVERT Li LIKAR iCEI NDYD Wl10MAt EDEIIt PERT ICAL DATW PYI PDINI a ERIICAL INTEREtI IDN Nlt R/1 w RDR NOl IN tCN/RKT RIOIT K DAY 30 fTA SDIL BORING STA11011 IP UTILITY PDLC ip01 GTY iLMIW EPIUITEXT Di 1PANSIV1TAllp1 r•sE IELEYI410N CR m iP{L iLORIW PDER { LIdT RTi ~ WIlEO TELEPNpK K RORIW WSE LIK ( CEMTERLIK iLOR LIK F PR64R1T LIK tlP [ORRUGAlEO KTAL PIPE D.I.P, dICT ILE IRDN PIPE PYt POLWIMYL OaDRIE PIPE IEfPE NIPI DENSITY PDLYETNYLEK RCP KIKWQO CONDiCIE PIPE ERtP W ELL IPIIGL KIKMLED ODNWETF PIK WNMLE fTR ST0R11 SEER STAUCIWE A.Ax' LI/11.xM RT iEET LEFT r iEEI RIO11 ti3V~~Z~7 ~ AIR KLEASE YALYE. CDMLETE IN~IK YALYE R/ RDA ••K/I••~ iIK IrtpRANI, CgRCTE 8<OR-0Yi R/BACTERIAL RAYLC WINI BKIERIK 1NR[ PYIINI -~i aoR-arE Z PIPE RUO -L W1ER KTEII IRRI WTIDN KTER KpK[R ~ _BAC4LDR PAEENIER/ABDYE DRMIO KTW SAKI IARY EER YAMN0.C ~-~ fANI TARP SERER LATERAL { CIEAN-DDT M- PWP STAl10N STDRY EER { STRIIOIWE KApflyl y{MDWLL ~ MI1R01. STRUt1WE ~ YITEKD EILAiLAED EIO SECT IDN ® PROPDSEO ELEVATION ® PROPOSED PAYEENI ELEYAIIdI eA1sINS ner{nw EAISi INO PAEENT ELEYATIpI ^^~ DIKCTIPI O< DWIMAOE rLOR ssuc . mRCrna ar r1,a NAIOICAPP[D PARAIK SPAC[ NOTE: DPEM SYYBDLS AIO DASKD LIKE DENDTE EAI ST INO I WRDYEIENTS RESIDENCE INN CLEARWAT6i FLOF~A A DBV~OPIn6~ff 8Y THE CLARKS~AO~ N COMPANY VM/ wP y II~ ~~'~ ~/(/ ~IIII./BIII~ II J (~(~ ,9 CLEARWATER ,~ Q ~~ \ DREW ST 590 ~ 57 I • 1 LF-TO-BAY BLVD B ~ DRUID RD n N_ V ~ ~ 1/1RfllIEM Rp K ]: Q ~ R m ~ i BELLEAIR BELLEAIR °~ W 3 Y LOCATION MAP SITE MAP ~l Miller /~ISlsfs " ~ID61! ° ° 8111tl)q//t • (/DdIC~? • flRll~plsbfl ARw..•~„En.,.•DI~~R.T.R,D..T. ORIGINAL fA71 dMMkkYb OMs, dlle 4IXW . TanpA Fkrtll SI601 a PIIMIS BD-P29-DSDD a Ftr 8{9-129-0009 . EmM Tellpe•Nfonllermm .Web ~~~1 MAC 0 6 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX TO SHEETS EF6nPD CDIOE1016 YAP 81( Alp UfeAIY RAF GRADMD t WARIADE PLAN PAYEYE117 ! m1ADLR6 D(GlS 4tE RAM KEAIE •AI[R xrAR,s SAPBEARE ~MCR OEEALS PRQ[Ci OES1Ci[R I PRQ[CT ENO{rtER I PROAECT 41RYEYat KNn JwlEpen IINNN EhIrNNV, PE BR 40; P1.6 s40EE0 8r ~ DALE a.n PROiCi NIR~ER T-05~2fl-00f-000 ®® DyA~tE NDE% NUYBER 9roawa ~ a M 1016 a MM O00 0r .000 a m ~ ,rexw.•r4x a• w,~xrEx•x~E xnr~~ngr~•xmoa way r •aa•rs ixR11R.n o owar.w rroecw. p l •... pp~~~ r1K~a ~ M~iw W ML 1.[1...[ •• .~ Dy1[M. fOYYt •~0 1•~•1aK1. roM M R larmr[ .~K .1rrlorrra o. M imM ru ~ aoa w u wu r rr ssn w K W..~¢~tnID4 .~Grf O M ~•.~ W .YR {.OY YwYlt aWOx• _ ~~.~ .l• Y 01a1C1pIR !u Q~A rH~[ Oaf ~. ~ N MrOw~ a M ~ ~R mNY SvKO/6 wuL ~wu M w ~ 00 n4 n0Y w® A4 aM wYfY MnOV~R ~ O ~L~IYA Iid /i0a ~~S` ~a[L~~ y a V ~ wr.n. a M o1MSr4 arao iamn. wsna r, m r aooss ra M ro.o•40 iKre:o M i49. rw, ro M rra rwR r M •oova 9001 Doors raaalf ra 1K .iRP. M••ad•~ YlR ald rOri WI•rlt nOR ro0 Y1M M] Ouawa o 'aw r.r.alwn Mrsat r row r M rs.r. nr.o n[1n1m n elan R rrM1.Mn M'aO 11rr•i[0 1rr1m' r f9F r 1K RO.Y a[r.m N OMM r Isrl r a wrvA..o aeodrr roo re•n r .arcm a • roar ~~~ • a a11R11oa r0 ~ raR wNNLL~ f WO r WNwm w Y ~ ~0 ro •~•1001~w6.~iOh.! rlpnlu .[InnR r rOOi F M 00100 a M 106.8180, M lrwir - 9r4an i1 OIiL Or ~ MM1S Y[ ~a aY®a a[OL. ro M~* dLL ren.r0l0. m ti i YO.rO~ OR OIYHi. ~ MbR4[ rx~•• ~ s aAa n~eswvnrn•xxra .w 6a.a v nwauc moen .i1r.o w 111 .•R1m ro roiow a r ac roan., wnKroa waR rona me a ou. ~a~n ~ r.z a ww.c re•ruoa r< e~. o w m ~ fn O..f Cream w r+1r m aartisno'mi6iAUa m im m~~ a wm aware ~a nswm .es wssaa w s9elgro aR.rs ramaa RAao oasis i~m...w"O m m Rio mnu w°~v.°mm. noa sma ~. w ~o. ro. uro. w.r ro rww. ~ ~ s a ut OYO~ObI ViM 0.m .NOr 4~[R OR ~ ard0 iKr r0 r~6 .YR w6 ~O rwai~ f WD a MOOS ~.YR ~a rYY M Or p rr s OMRORYT.L 1rORCIA Ia R M ~a 0001Rf a..0.m ro .D9r ~ l p 0~ O f1000 .O[I rxQ1 aOr ~ OR ~WpyMI~UOYQ IQNO~raR[J OO~[~N w00 4m10 Oma1 O iYIA 10 .~Of~~R~x01rOw9fOwO .wYLL4 rpRr /u M.4O[ Oaa1O R ~FY~p •Otp 4P 10 M WIf1 1M01 O OO a OfMi.Tr O IOa NiaW46 waY air ~. _ 1s6~ 914TH. 0O[r4. no wwOM ru® Rnwiroa u6i onRrs .mm a rwn s.u s w s®oxe ~ .rroeruirn~ m m.rte a awry n14+ac i. M smla O ORIR4~RK1Rima Y[ fOY ro Mar alw00LL W 08u1K 0ruC1a[ lw 00 086 f Wl r 11nro 8800 Ia w~ .O~O.OL imi oaeeci rwa one oo m nms wn .o wr'n m°~°i maw 1~'R~+mua sesennen sra mica 1MOOa a • fO4 L, YaW W 010w~a4 i WOtli r •~ M%WAr10 rf191[k m 1a nswm srr wn~~ i4amo an umtlia ~raO6alrr°m irrw~10Riro ua i sao M emn rillOi rp~O1W~.® x0 WaM1I11 Mr91x. rrn r.ww 1o M.M YOw10 4RYI[. 1K 11•~an41 pia' u. m.rwf°~'nwroio rrn n s Din n rm r .o.wa ro i a°iR smrl~i.o°s.u ru.r ro waon ro an m, aaa. oe. M wr nr+a M ..oRa. M w4c1a srv r rawm 10 onx 1raR rom~il'wsna sroiav~`aaas m wo.s ar.a nec+lras rrR r w.uo ra .1 Mr AIn4 r /avert fac ro sa001au1 aer r/[ 9x, art •1r easl•111a net rwa M4. O raa IO0 Olr1 ~r°°oa~- w1°rs'w°° ^^~`"~"sO"'E "•"'rw•xeeromau. rm s orm ar M r'r`1vs Warr .ro r1uR rr.n r .oRC1m ra war iraM w~ra °aroO nc .ra +a.n a ~ a ~ ro awa M a.m ma K aR< tp~ M WO M xn. rlor ro m.1a. v mea t OOIV r0 r SRO. ItO OI tilt a r®.4M1 N wO 101 O0a aYi 0 m1.Rea 1RLLi Oita •mro1a0 w M 9oaa n ~O r~O ~ ~ ~ uxvenx0a .re romrlc 1101 v monl0 w ranaluR ti Ol I0.I1~~1108Y[81S veto a 904801001 iYY Or W YM' I~~.MMa. xP rYQ I ~ ~ 14~ 1 0IR 0.r1~® O1 00`am ~ f4 1 0f 1 ~ [ ~ a ~sma ym r~r.omwr~ ~1y a ot~o ao mainm m mwr wa mnr reYOU ro^ailnwn nw mwv°e .a°urs a 110 ~ ranRR rs ama ro OnO[ e0Y1rl R1ouo .191011 0n0111. r ~ OM~WOa w~aaR. x~0 YrMrira M a OrtHK P/iL Mfa OMYM1 .a ~ ro i rn rta.amr w.rmon mloa 9o.n a .rwem ar rO[ n[OOa~a ~ a m r N 1 W n 1 VK ael8.oa 10 i1n M lvm s19 R[n•a 1K ansn rosaR 101Ka e.eaa mmM M OlWa6 rra M M~~a~1aMt a0a1C YRr oa1R 9.14'OOOri' I Kti 4 gal9[~[OMiwM~ 6~oRaR1OOS~~o IOKw•0~w.a[i~wrcru~l[a ~ rnPrrw~i.af na i~~ 4 KV Mr aAY~O • IIOO~n ro M 000L~Y M inn 0 rM a a T IIOlra O' Olna MIDa pi) rW~ Or .OO Oaa00riN INOa~ RON m!) 0i1is 4 ~ lw 9a01a rx0~0¢®rM 0w[R'M•r1f aOYOp mllln F • r0e1m 1no 90n1a. n0'.tl-4f ooms moraiaia ro mnrorz a amRr'~i. ~w~ ~ i r¢ um ue srara ~ ~ ~1m waRneaaK s°~ia wO°~mawerar so tan sratz im io rso~.1. am a q wa.rla~wa row asal+aamralrnn w ew9a re aeQ su iruw rr am1 wwaw.® ra M mroluen 1 error a m1m Ru seen ara oroo R4L r.0aa Or <~ ~~ Tt7 ro wRR4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~fiA~ 0 6 2006 ... ... si. r~rn~f1T11A[PIY . OY1a 0-11O.K .10 u OIO L. Ia. OW ~u ~ ~reQ u.m r.s a wsua owo~sa1~ rx M18r aaO~~ iN Mr IYI a • Y.IYr y0 Ir K afOl M f0OaC1A O MWr YO sc'~nuo.srY°° ~' Kwr om rain ro on • m o6~ au ai waf • wry a z [.a1M Yoe a 0018r101Ma9 2 a1~0006••0 M4..A.1 M 1irOY .r9 WWO• a a Dam s s1 worn a rRmr slao awn sr.~ w9°`i1c~ m~isc°r w~ a. v 9mo mRS.w usa a~i u'nar~u.r R•WOa wars, sr s•¢ g0i1O. 1•mr9 r saesm a M Brun r< swsorln. •1a aug Art •1a id ros on 0 oaslua 01w® ix M ^11[ a 011mr11 a M 1! 0044 Y8 O 1 A O)i1~wIR. q 00 tiO. x101 N I.R 111.01.a00MR a01 011 a6n •rorlsa4~ ssr ta1R 4u a wlrm n b m0a0r alnoomw 90wK ax oss a s rlx an 9calalan ~QAm 114. a 1®a 4s w®im won and an wolwalt tan ro ae:~ • .valnia i. on a ro Rav sn 9e oaa 9sno aiaiesR o wmi1R oia nR oioi aroam, a~ewRn m 1 a nasnm a =~>W mss ~ o¢c1m irilar 1°b~raiRia smr.4 •r sme e1r a woea.oKaufQirrs smam oesrr rr a. armrrn 11111 frl 4 1Rm tl i 0r81.80000t 4 Ei 8.001 8E tMaa OI ailml YraO L R ~1WwNCNO va ara Ra1i .lrswa a r4a*wn rat rn aMin ~nme~w waM~iwmn~irx~alwrna~ aaroa vm4rcmr e ro rw 1a met es9no sr.orrR ono rRx M siR Dolma 9a°~'Pa11. wwaRaO6M ae°c.s mO1 °s1a~a m 9aNw. r0 0aa{ sw• a ss9auo sra Po ,!R WOV~t WOIfT. 81091 II9 084010 0880 /01101 A a X04 L]a 1~ ~91a~xe[ wMOM lO.OwD !.1/11('~Or 1101 pYM41fQ ~~[ 1000 OYO P ~OC~YCIR~ fO.l Po 0010 OalYep ro 00i aO rCOO a0Y01 •b O00 1000 111pp9lt Ma 01008 OK• O 9irQ~aM Q ~ ~>~~~O1ML ~ iml s° m0°O~Oew¢YO•ii+ra~ aml w~°Pr°ma ui wniu ' o rrr w• rs a.a1A • ssrsr'a sue m am D41IMWn w • 1Q1® Mml W COOrq w p~O..~~ it a>1~ a10ta 0~M10i b OI~~.4rO0 r a.~. » ~ .... ,... r.. ,... Baal _ ~d S BE31C11°~ ~^ 119.11' B: 1 - + - tt:e ~\ ~ _ a ~ ,.r A n.~ p4as ,,.u li •''e .._ tl.d3 6:1f i:if tl:il • me __ _gg n -3'- ~~ :if pW-ea ~ ~Pa~l_. _ I SECTEON 15, TQiHNSHlP 29 SOUTH, RANCE 15 EAST imu~e m°~wde°ieewla slorl ln~mt amel°eq oaWim ea1as11 3 ~ ~ ~~"°a :~11~.1~1~~.-111. °a>°°p1°Iln" :1MO11 A ~. ~IQ WIM. WQ~M qR 0a~.~I` M rW )~i1~M ~ 7~0~ e~.01 0°a1W Imo m~ogy~ ). r~~11eM biY IS IY~ ea. Ili1. I~v~ 0.0/ ~eOII N Oa1c - rlel MOriW Mlaap 6 ~M M bu~Ibb F~ q~ ~1,0~ X01 NM. HJ° INf. (9NKI N IWIO[ - IAe ROrI1D IflmX) ©~ I m0 'a°'i m~°s u~m.iwe~liarar 1 e. ~..a ~~ ~I~arYlep rp9plplOtlORf IOG W M 11100 I®0N O IBBPo'.VWI011 lEffFlm rf IWm rm role wi ro10eO1ia A/V qL ~/ WII ri~al1°'liem~~eioma umaoa"I s0} a/ ~ MM~ A Al1e.EY IECflID LL ~ w114eg11t~!/R tea _ taro m rR 1~ rt. fK ailP ~~ tart: mlro - ~r~mo aID ,.., h ~ awe; 3 Pi 6:i1 PPR~0. ~ ~~~•~ y 01 ,,. - x aox a aon ~~~ ~ ~ fi" f .o ~s' Iwmmr'e iw 'C •- 'C ~ • 331f m. .~ ~~ J[°S • d Vicinity Map Nd To Smb 3eb 4~ 1 r B • ~ ~ O ~ I @ li:Y y~ ~ I ~ ~~ tt~~ pp V ~ I::fi 99 n.e. d lr IJ ~y~ y~ n.w.b rr mvi Mn F r G avow IOtllll1e wWi+ A:G r ~ e °ill ~°rrmweYel.lr w w'~'. n :r d ti~,w.°u.dq n~•uu 11.. ~r Y v a~ . \ y ,,. ~ ~~le ~ ~~ f. a ,ws!(F IM ledi 14 roP \ li:f3 „ emrt olo uol[ nWwrar om® ee ~°O.~ •e °slerw Imem iwv. ~..w n ~m 1~ ~ I ~ ~y i~~: _ N r s.ai. a raweY s mp Irw ~e F~ \ ,,.. S .; i ~ G~ ~ r Ir br.r.e. d w .w.n r d au+ w.r a r Ism ~ .ro w d w.° w... ry w ~u.y py.w~,1.,y .,~ ~ K ~ ~ ~aI A®~Irl W ~ rsl~e I i~ I ~ .: . ,.o. e.. «., ,r. N'W I \ ,..,, , 11i_ r m>o w°r. ~ ~`rb~~r' ioni~k,i : rw~ ~Iro s ,•r a.e ewbl r KKmsra, p1a-.e, w, d r°w n.y.a n..s n.s ra aruw r a..l am smmxrc ..ibnj..u°i ~ ran °w.w I.r an r r w. ~awYiM d 61vrq lb.~ ln4 Nell M b 1A. . . \ d Mrb6 a1V b~A 41°YI~ i]0 m~ ~m a l~ nie a~esoN co~~wr fi oe~sn-x;e corromoHS ~ MAC 0 5 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER M m snE eaa~wnmc YwY~OACN R.YC Y~II~ MAc~ 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIiY OF CLEARWATER --_~ -e ~ \ `\ ~~ 8~ K~An~ ` YON OC KI16b (~~ \ I~pM q rt YNO N.N~ q A Y01 Yow Kart nnn io ru aoi ii°s q:. ~~ no s°oi'NN wr.YYna..m or~uste.r...a..t ~ x / ~~~rl~w~e Na wo oci .:.am \ \ / ..~ \s THE CLARICSON COMPANY SRE AND l1TILL1IES PLAN BB55C; 1aE 4/8.11' -~ . ~ . :4 w. 3:~ ~ ~ i. Pi39:l9F _ n:K IL ~' rtOm N[ 1w10 wa~~u®3 ~ ` \ ~no~aiwwvc __xoma 93 n[ wuawo M<aatmm woum w ~~ - umt a 13: n.o x wo m~a .aw:a ar+tw~ oormra on[ - a sow a sm w~ Q r~na r,M rs Hs/v o~wu u.o7 • n yr ` y` ;.. - Q a. W~watr w i°wiauc°° ~ w~naot ~- ~ oma:~ }:v...< R: I aK+l ema am .~. t«f°°' 1. ~ r'wnauc - nor warren wm0 ~ 9 3g my Q t~r.rt w..a w~ a. aw m awt r r`a t . ~...w \~bWajlr Oy+a~aao ~0~ on. e.M m. M to ~ ~ ~`:, ~~:R - 3f:K ~ ; t JII ~ norc as wmao aaramm rva ro ni vuem lmaoa v waw aouor. nmaaa r °.°m"°~.~. ~.~..< IeBaEVNtIaN IEOElO ~ ~` . s- '•i'• ~ o ~- Z _ ~,,,, _.. a: ~ 4::..~7 Z 3• E ~ c°aarwo°flm \ 17:33 t. •. w Z 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~7 m ~ ~w ~ ('} > 3amm --~~ .~. teen 17l G / amuawe u - Ewa .a. w mma. omen ammo. ® +. 3 3i aurm tieffi D tv m ~"' : ~ ~l~ t~ . r.a. to a ~ ~ ~~ ~' , ~° • -~ ~ uw~ouaao°a ~ ww`a i r°~ _ w c w. u°'a vor au....... rv...a.t . \ 511E BFNf]01MK C) :.aa gnu ' wo' wT'bS.•"... ' m:'ID "",."::S ~ \ ~ ~ w aloe awn Z a .ad.aa ' w.a.w .. ~. arxc ,nom: N~1' ..... ,-+E cuv~csa, co~~w,r cw-o„~c e3 0 ~, ~k .cam .io. ., rsraotcox oudum.um°~°i~m"w"ie..e m~..o~.wsar~r~.. to s fe 06RIf-ODf-000 6 . o r~wnsr Sep To i11 _ ... '..{ P DAw.ey~ :. 9': R ~ b znauac swoux _ cwvecrzn m ~ w TYPE 'D' CURB VALLEY GUTTER nz.s - Slope Tn m aT .wu.. onr..m ~~ :p''• •ko-' ~b ~~m 9T•Bpl}ID SuBGRMC TYPE F CURB CO~ACfD 101n"0 sure DROP CURB RLa _ wnun ra elm swrc a >~ wmp r.u wml >K apn >. rpn0.M°wa omw umum ,.nrc onu> ~aVr ~V.• mr..cno~ .om ., ,n vxme wm~`Ti pnmrt nwiz .~'~.rz .mns xma`m o~ ~u mmm~u `a.m°~Owm v10io wm : artrt. opxaox '.ix u n a ~ mi a sero~'••n~ir s aT'~ius s"'ivu`•i w'rx~imi/r ao~'. ra ma w •vxwx (~'Q KPIp1W ~ ~.CL'f!1'YW A scKl: ~ r-,a v: r-4• MAC 0 ~ X006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~rt _ _ sued aowwmrm PIFIRIO 9Y Deem vvw~rt ~ aav val eaaw fm nxz ""O° rs mau ~vrt ewlaavo r voo •e r M . b z Ima..mmn e~m r.z 'U b.~. zr.ei ~ v`~`im m .~~1 b.~ - ~l us¢snw%aop. R T-top} TIWMU4~ m M ummrr[ xM •flx o +•+-ro Wmr mnaT nrPlcu TRENCH CROSS sECnoH au Neanwoone ~~ ,u f m~ ~L~rlraors IJI:If,9 W11~11161' .`"-°`""._~°`"`: THL's a~acsaH co~AHr n....xs....m.lr.• ~•I..~..b.s.p.,,n.~p,... ppp~R; DOWPIII)MIN~A~ u smT. l: wa ;~ °'° ~..ognym ~•a-as rm,r m~nm ~pyp~ nL~ AtiPI MIK a•It1a1F va~- CIUfN pox[ILl[ M-Iml. ~ M>tm i-~!0 /®~ 6011 •N WOIf 54'~ ~IXN CM1' AxIT R pi ~'nc taim d~ mmFR P~-boo} o[1 .u9~10 T-~pD ~ Talmw M •q TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION xLa mll~ m~ s uwrvns - ve ins mw z v z u.mov > xuamniu - new r v ~ unla ~n,m~i n®wia um~•o °oeomm er enamueoav ~ 06MUCICM TlID IfRY f4wIM 6 ~•d ~ 1160WM pP ~ Al !Of-1N1. "~ ~• __ r vm ~ ~1~~ SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT AREeS ~.~ .~,.: ~ .ws b ~° o a~ w w ae°.au. ~In .per.. ` ~ ` ~,~..n~ww.~ ems.` ..va.xn wx.... w dw+x > ? ~w..`~°'o r.~, .ti...v., adj... w m .w r .~xm.. x .e n...x. v.. ~ac1 w~xo rglsnx Ys Nrb m xd~i e~ elic+ nw ux a e.~ P~ h mx rmu • ICOpAS~ ~~wweM ~ K w MWru`o 4 M ~+ a ane~ w.xs~ w n~ >/4 M IsV ~nlbo x~peM1t xo o-mse ~..~ wwx •.un m a u.a.a ., .. a....• . o+~.n xs.xv as wep ~ os pn apn W x mr ~a w~Mq mNnxn M > NNMa Pb m Mrt x•sx~•'~ple q~ ~ 4~ P~1Yn ~ iMW M .:~, ~»~..~. e. ~ x . ~«... > ., xw......m d ...,...a.x. Inn w •..~~...aw.... a.. w+~Iw. p~x~~..~wv. T. a... .loe.. ti mx a wa . p. «... w.ox p.~ xx~xp .m d a x . xxrnrx «ou a iz na mmv nr, >p~ ~ a x. rp.r.. n r p., m. xw~p .m e...xn,.a evap rn.. n ..aa... rnw .,ma. xd.v.~. ~.. d a.--a a ~ nwsv+~n. wl> x .x ..,v~x ..~ x x L'~1`~ ... a.w.. xp.n. ab .x.a.p ~. ..e .~,e.l .v., xw.. xlonl i.r .... w ps x x rx..a°.s°".e x~in m °' xs+ w x.xp > ropes r p.. ~ mw aw.p ~n a..w... s~ n.n~a x w+ dn•r x q..ax~rxv .a vra.r r.a..aw~d>x.ww l . uu ~ M°w p`sxw` . nr e.x. r •..~ .+alvnr waa. ( ya w w .,xeeip"0w ti ~~ pw~++w. •a_ro+~ ai ~ `•~'°•°" aw. a ~'.• v..,x. 6 11OAMMN~ M who w ua9x uw x ~Kn M eg p~ xwmre M s ~w r awe ~pnwen ~ a weelten •~b a xbneM NN eMe nwu rwsnti a w w xYUx ~) b ~6 ~ vNN sl r xpeW w aprlr• b w •4=.1N M/bw1 ~ urn Yw•r d xs~iwen W Yx~ M~+a'9 xexM~ s'__""TrW~ Iln xy w MPV xeMlp+r. Mp MvW br a r 1sT xpyxy ~ M Y 1•npiC~O eusl Dry del• w~ x uO 1+"N' MW ~n s+ ~ ~M~ Alos~l m~W 4 w Ix IIJSLa ~ Nu uen nun M b t~l tl b ~ err Mir pr .IW r Wp~4 M mil s pn-Im~6 M' xOnlnb PwW M~ M V IwyW ~• ow M m w •nyq x• A endlby W W nyb T veYneveYne ~Be~nunnl ary O~Y aitl O'lsns M pydtlb a~rM~Trs dti YV rYr rar x..l a~4 ou•ntl Win..: ~~ m.. ~, a,. a ~,:~. PAYEMEM AND IYtADIND DETAILS ~ I HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL NOTE: RTS ed ppv.xaT IpawMp w ee mv.mpq®u~ ~.~ ~'' a.ol. A A as 4.-~i I TIPICAL CEN1 EWAY C r ~O - RO55 SECnON R PUN NEW 1 ~b wM M ~r m0• as I /r Iwl - r~-ae an ~ r rr . r w ~~w~~•~w S~ gCRON A-A ,~ _ _ gCnON B-B .1.... a...1........1e.r ....... •vJw"r1~ w ~rrwal •tl•Wau oY1w ~a.wr ~~Narf !9 ~ ~ Ire Tw•~ ~) 1 MVa416J Ebb ^~ mwwe9 ~) IM b' ~ A A rb E1fYA710N SECTION wa aE.9rrwr.w.•..w~..rP1.w.9a9wn9on 7VPE i SILT FENCE p, ~ ~ ww• s.+N r. r,,.. E.9 .. a, .... ~^ ~ i ~+•v1 n9 a >« re w''^.w` a9 sE°9.• ais 9w a a+ r.9 ~Rwwar • ....~ as wt rws , ~~ ~y rn m.l x. wr 1 e a eawa..9.l.19~°a.w~rrawa rlor .who r'a~ir~ PARIVL INIEf COtlPlE7E0 UREf DIIGI BOTTOM NLET MAID 0 6 2006 p{.p,NN6NG DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~ a~~ ii~ ISOMETRIC NEW owe TaM9PW 111 /1 9 11 0 1 norAn«a A-A ~ aaW1N OM• N•.Nwaa are ero r RET1RNEC CURB RAMPS sECnaN o-R .. 1~ ~a.u.9. ... as NN r ti ~ ~ eb `~ I 1~ w r .•r i f! r I° °'t°' a w rr .+a aw. IVrJ r r . ww. r a d0°° :LL r. lr eww. amo 1a w ~ r 1...r+. r•a. ~.. •/ a- M re. fbPJ rr/ 1m tl.TS ElE1fA-Otl (p ~ r e~xs. ~. Nm•am 3 t:lp ~~ N•P•a•C ~ w v aooo.r o. a.a ~ m s•P PaC r SECTION 'A-A ILpn' .,~ Noes ~- ~ ar~ r~ w~ws w r s awyi MtivJlaw~CMex w.p al wlY 1 M ~~ N a M welw~ b~ ~ .M'"..~~ r~«~ ~ 1mPi.4.a w..a.' Nea. a•°~ w o1:•..ra°i:a w•w.m :w is .1'.x`9...7.." ~"7:w'°s.l°i:w.","r ® r .`. aaaw n`eT."r e. 11°"w °~°°r`~°~ a" .°"'1 s a ...,.~.99....19.wrwaa..1....a F a OYmI w9 we 1n9 9M Y Y tiwW arw~ BUS SHOP PAD tl4II5: u 919 wrar. ~...... ~... aar~nr10°a°9.9~.isw+w+99. w.ww :w:owli~`1'•M ww.e•le or aw.«...m al mew a9 •N911w M/qaa 9`1 wwra4q wrr•9w wuo mu ~lp9m.9.e...1....w...91.e ~w.~~~a•~r9~ ~o-mN9w ~.. r."'rl ~.~.r+. mow..-e °mw°`...r r ~~.«. wr ~a°.. ~"w'„w..:.°'..°'•w"+..`w~ 7L'a~"1a w F~r-~r`1 ir~+11°..+r'^~. vow ~w~ ~~ r11""1~i.~ e`.w.~ ~a°.M erarrwraee r~r. a ~ ~~w.....r 9wr r.ww ~~w.w..r r~.9.9 w,-u ~ niE oo~,wr sr~ Puw oeT~as e.YMmortmmwrmw dale"R mmmslmra pm nc~mout°1m i w er~mr'.K.w+~ eco.m ad m s r~ s a~a E 1"l lr,~q®~A OYryRp~a" MCI. V YYt V GO • mil Q~11r110 E I~rl~r ~N Wi er wales -6HNY. ~ e erw a ew er-er ~ ~ ~ ~~ Yw r FlC CuNAI N OtM Sr ieNe TYPICAL SECTION END CONNECTION f Y ww/ r~ ~~r r aw.r. z me.m..~ *ww red. tOP CONNECIgN TEMPORARY BLOWOFF AND SAMPLE TAP NUFllpl NI ~ ~ aiC u+~ > w...a w~m~ MuE~LFP N1D00! ~ ('na'P i a w~iaE l1 ~; ssae e~ a, \ s' vvc "b O ` •td. swwo. rvu~y .m'°~ ~.a+ ~ Tr".eeow. afro > wa/+«e~.r 6Ax M 8qi P. JIO! O 011o11~Ya11 Eop• M1R~ WF CHLORINATION TAP :~ ~ .....,m. I-•-Ili///,~...~ '\ Cb e00Y lnb (qp) \~ ~~ ~~OSOn 4wJ im ~R ,m,.w •••••~emneo ~ n a runol ao P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT a4 Y~i~ ~ bJ e~~ w 10-~nm~Wle~ N{' d ~~~~ ~ ~~~ TYPICAL VALVE SETTING ~. rVnln Ba e. Y"m 0~ N~101® gI CrI ~ a w. Iw1m 1 n. Vat O aw >. aiu rim' w woi ennui cammir .nwni swor°m°ow~w a xi ua avu R wa"wm ." noauc immMaor ra ar xoul " Im v~ m ~ a~~ i r< r~°~osw awa°p~`iorw xw'~ ~ua~i~n° mm nvwln ~aa awwr avw un r"w ~wimsnmmniw i~ . r.". ~ s,.me n...sr /- IIIIFIIa Mi q y ~ / M61a M11]!0 ~M la! N9 aM (I~eNn~l~I~re ~ ~~[~ ~'°'P~e iM v MaM eNe~ DM Neb~O ~ Ilad LeMS TMy O M W1 R N0! M1bMb~" Mn~ ~wnleap~ Cut1ln~Ym Uo1/. rdnr IIeY~ SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL EsN...~e vae. o.~., a oeme«w macaw. wme. Nnae TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE ~~~® ., ~e. M~~wre~ L`Ae~ IN Mi} l\ _~ •52.:x® ~i) r ~~ „° el TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 1 1/2" and 7' MOOEIS O Tp Vlen ~'Mae"?Yb FM YY lay"men ~~~-~`~~ r~rrrr~eer ~` neuu~i."~im°m ' e ~~ jEx tf NRw O~ nnw"sw~ w m ~~ TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 3/4 and 1" MODELS tl w"~ aao ` RAa ~r~ ~ ~'~' AtieO ,... ~ 919IS5 RTIIL _... ,.....de.. / e.~.e r_ ~ ryN O M ~ IYiyJ R M ~ / 1W ~Ui~ Boa ~ `ee. er uawr~ r r arr r e.s.a ~ M"e iFe i Omni r"`e. ~i~ •~~. m ~ ~ ~ om vuv sm e"r mam mrr tv.om ar.m bmo o.r® ~Nro TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET THE CLARKSON COMPANY WATER DETAILS MaR o 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ro a Ep ~ camParo ~ on3m Iwc °r.urlcia m a ~Fm.rrai ~ F'.wa o... iFYNE NYF'RA TI°° dl ya I d 6F QVALf1E FM MM FaanEn CanValtl ms°~i IV i{ m e ywawwN u.aw Pal Nw lol a EWY P.1 I.1 s aP e- Iro .a.~a....,~.. ran Is w a Fina Flay Saw Ya4l M abm » r f~ laW TERMINAL CLEANOUT DETAIL aam "` F°"'m ° `°° ® Nrs. CLEANOUT DETAIL IroIE: alma FpN coa. to e. 3.. N31E F. rlanw e.o.YO aa..a. us Fawn )E°J a EgIY. Ilai. " a~a C0.E1 ERED C SW3NR SE IAIEAPl RE°UF~ SroXY PIPE a' SMIrtNH SEMR UlfWl ~T C gFARNaCE n LE' CIFIANICE ~6 / PIPE Ju ' Pte- SECTION ATI ~ e c ° E F o snenw a- r r a• Ym J• z um a I EY. SWMar3 1.1'- 3' J'- Y Ym 1' a 1 EN. 6 '- 10 J'- Y id Y Ym 1 a l EM. 3w 13.1'- 1{' J•- T 1/' 3' Ym 1 a 1 EY. I. M ww. ame W +~ A. wm tlwimrR~rv~~~~~ T PIIMI va°a b R,• alb 3.Y n+h. 1A rtloti /aA M1arn ana m Jc aw+aa Baal a are a E!°a a Poarnaa ~ ~-a'T Taa W-]C w m o°.N.° q Ina p GR/' 3E1m 1E11EOElEP1 ONYFD -Tiro YNMNNFII Pro °luxaerto t J.wa. uxa A101" N!Y vN3NKE WSf IlalE YI3nEN SECTION N4RW,1L a na arc EYpl~i. STREET LATERAL DETAIL y~ 7 t IM a anti 1-1/~-'I N F lalro - 1lVi P1N1 l`aYa ~,• '~ 11w ~ p' p'w a lYa~wal a r ~ ° fF SqD C3NA x YawM a I- aN/~-1 ~l E F IOIO - SECllgl ~~ M Fav rr >% YNwMn 11N1 % DE Oa ~ 1~1 9ECIl3N aYPa m a ~° laa.ai 1. ~ r . aasi... ~ 4 FaywY...apr.m IuP °rwn~...°"'~ii s i..P~awbY'r w r as .aw.~.a 4.V 3aiao~. e o e Igpwa lela r a °y ,,,~ n. ml°~~ : n~ .w}w r ap""j,' "~°"a' a e Ptw w..~batlnp e o e o e a e ,_, ,w,,,a,,,,, SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE COVER -~ ° ° o e °o 0 0 ° ° r ,,., ,. °• ~ w ° e° e o e° °ww.l° aa°°ooe"~ ~ ° 3 0 o e~ a' aa~ ~ ~~ e ° e Falaa mwa Some ~":~ ~4 PM a+r ~ N ~ 1 soup CAYFA alaP PiP nmis awl b w..r ~ avc ~ a ry... ~ ~ a Ip aY~C`°. r~.~.yrr l~a.:~°.r°Ai. r~r a is s xya..TO°°u.v~Ea Ixs .rum W~ M ~M 4~ ~ h)P~s PRECAST SANTARY MANHOLE DETAIL W/ OUTSIDE DROP ~,a,T~ ~~ PINC - SECTION 1Ylalll 3J K SOIJD COVES SECNON NOTES YaIEN. 1°0 Ral. 1. YS. Fmn3ry Na 11) Ibq NIE BL Caw, Q Equal, ~~NITA~S~ER MANHOLE GOV R~IRON THE CLARKSDN COMPANY MAC 0 6 ZOOfi PLANNING QEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WASTEWATER DETAILS RE3URFD BFYD ~ S Slat. SANITARY SERVICE~~ORM PIPE CON~I~D~AIL 1 D W a 0 a x H 2 3 4 ORIGINP.L RECEIVED f`{HI~ ®'J 2Guu ANNWG DEPp~tTMENT ~-N OF CLERRWATER ~ z 3 S DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT ST. o CLEARWATER R PREPARED wa The Uarkson Group PREPARED BY: f~1SQt1MBlerDeslgn WilwnMiller, Inc. nm~auuu~a...~.~ 5 t IN COOPERATION WITH: KBJ MchHeels, Inc. B • FA NI TOBTO, 1 ] 3 4 5 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT ST. ASPHALT PAVEMENT p CIFARWATER FL 12' REINFORCED CONCRETE BAND PREPMED FOR; CONCRETE PAVERS WITH PRE-CAST CAP, MORTAR INTO WAGE The Clarkson Group SAND SWEPT JOINTS 1'-D Bk Bkl6'CMU BIOIX ) B14•$AND BETTING BEO n '~`-k- ~ ~~- 1/2'MEOIUM SNCCO RNISN; COLOR PREPARED BY: Fars . ~~•FF w COMPACTED LIMEROCK BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADF KKECAST 4'-8' CONCRETE VENEE0. COIOR:'OlD CHICAGO' +v++~y„•-~~•+* PS DEBAR SPACED ®24' O.C., FILL CELLS W/MORTAR o W1500 4iIIBF, IOC. WISH GRADE _ 38%COMPACfFD SUBGRAOE mna0 WNPr4R ~a 2' PVC WEEP NOTE PLACE I' ABOVF fINISH GRADE GROUT IN NACE ClR FLVSH WRM fINISM FACE OF WALL CAST IN PUKE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ROADWAY PAVERS ~ SCALE^,'~'.D' ^V'O CENTER ARM 6'~' ~ L GUOE TITIF: SCARBOROUGH ]2' land stayy forms TM FREESTANDING BACXED BENOI 4311AWNOAIE AVE. PHONE: 800.921-2546 KALAMAZOO. M149D48 FAX 269-381-3455 WffN INTERMEDIATE ARM-WEAVE CONRDENnAL DRAWING INFORMATION COMAINFD HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN: SCARBOROUGH FORMS, LNG INTENDED USE IS UMDED TO DESIGN PROFESSIONALS SPEOMNG LANDSCAPE pgTEM: 0366,773 FORMS INC PRODUCTS AND WEIR DIRER 0IEN75. DRAWING IS NOT TO BE COPIED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUTTHE CONSEM Of IJWDSCAPE FORMS, LNG FIIF: SC3519 DALE: 09-01-94 c 1994 LANDSCAPE FOAMS, INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. AUTHOR: LAO n ^^ 0R~1 ~J ~ SCALE: ma• - 1'-a RECE~ MAC 0 0 200& -`-~ulw~ ~#4 REBAR CONTINUOUS IN FOOTING I 3'MA$0NRYWALL ®6.O.C.W/B3TIE5®48.O.C. IN COOPERATIONWRH: c .3a1 .. KBJ Architects, Inc. 8' DW OPENING un AND TURN uD To EMP11' e tDIX • I'-0' -~(~ A NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FREESTANDING OR SURFACE MOUM OPTIONS. NON{ORROSIVE ANOIORING HARDWARE SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. 7/Ib' DIA MWMING NOTE. le ndsca yyccforms TM TTTIE:SCAIIBOItOUGNtRTERRECEPTAOE- 431 LAWN WUE AVE. PHONE: 800.521-1546 25' W X 3371- TOp-0PENING -VERnCAI XAIAN1AZ00, MI49048 FAX: 269-361-3455 CONNDFNTIAL DRAWING INFORMATION CONFINED HEREIN IS THE RIOPERtt OF LANDSCAPE LNG IMENDED USE IS UMDED TOOESIGN PROFESS S SPEC FORMS ON MNG L DSC PE BAR DETPIL WITH LDIX-30GALLDN- FREESTANDING OR SURFACE MOUNT , I AL I AN A FORMS INC PROWCR AND THEIR DIRER CUEN12. DRAWING IS NOT TO BE COPIED OR OISQDSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE CONSEM OF LANDSCAPE FORMS INC DESIGN: SCARBORDUGM , . c1994 LANDSCAPE FORMS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. pATEM: HIE: 5[5217 TRASH RECEPTICAL DATE: 09.01.94 AUTHOR: LAO 4 SCAIF 3/4w~m= 1'-0' SCILLE; NTS A GATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2006 PIN: 05211-001-000 PfANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ LS-501 1 2 3 a 5 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT ST. D CLEARWATER FL PREPARED FOR: The Clarkson Group PREPARED BY: Wi1S¢n~IlerDeslgn ~. WilsonMiller, In<. ~rvnua'u'+ei~c[~c ~,w IN COOPEPATION WTM: KBJ Architects, Inc. PARKING AND INTI SE PREP (W nEOw~o oirewon w,o PROwoeo wreNOR UNo Nc cucuu roru PeowReo: rorry Paanoeo ® Pauaxca wrt ORIGINAL RECEIVED A MAC 0 61006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 3 3 I 0 • iuw.os ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION scn1E: 1 •=3a DATE: FEBRUARY 24.1006 PIN: 05211-001-000 NORTH LP-101 ~® ~e µo-. ~~aEE~w. ~~ ~~ ~~"ate. LARGE TREE --`-- GROUNDCOVER ORIGINAL RECEIVED A MAC 0 6100& PLANNING DEPARTMENT Cii'Y OF CLEARWAITER 2 1 2 3 ///~~~ an~e m ~~° ,u orowr usEia~~~ ~ / _ I_ PALM DETAIL 2 + + '+-1,~a~kF~n o.ai " ~- cue emeoF a.VCwe... TYPICAL PLANT SPACING roscuE 00 ~vROwe tttw. s~oom N+~4 utn ~5E8 sv[cwutwxs~ 4xEo ~~e° ~., MULCH APPUCATION 7 3 5 "ore: ~~nE~ ~o~~EM'lF~. MULTI-STEM TREE asw cou ro xm wn+~x l~E~o~l ~-~ i~F ~ I. '- ~iECCN~wwiwa #~ SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER 6 ._-._ 4 I 5 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT ST. CRFARWATER, Fl PREPARED FOR: The Clarkson Group PREPARED BV: ~ls¢nMitlerBesig -:~.~. WilsonMiOer. Inc. w moPERAnoN with: KBJ Architects Inc. • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: NTS DATE; FEBRUARY 24, 2006 %N: 05211-001-000 LP-501 1 2 3 LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE PLANTING NOTES 1waxE0. u+eF55 ixFavasr0.ax rt0.c wcv~ixs. xr. .,. asawx~su+ awa oa eu c„a,.,. *auxvx.axemwuurwrm.nsw•ae w"xa: + ~~P~~w ~~~ u~~~m~ fla~~a ~ryRa'"~."~sa.~o:.'~"°1.,ma~~flKx.n,Er~ax ~~m x.~xnm~x~,..,~a,.mxo,~~a m I+~.N.W~fluN~ ~I~ERmvEa-0.19 Bc[afaxu xw*WaGa acn+augox foi~iae[5. aa~B61~~0.0.6 FT. µA~xfl aFA+YCa oc LaUx(aw[+Eamnnualmumaau cenixxaex~ + + :nx.~+ximxw.enou ccgnuxea~~le. xr:a+urrac xauaoiccxExra c+oxpuswxo roxgnox aF rcn~ 0.amv+a wa0.x0.PI VFMCmuf xux waoECnaxuO norE>iv~. v. +ms..xu nmvxcas raoarooaw°wr°~~~ • ~wm..rnasraruxmxracrovs RECEIVED MAC 0 6 2006 pIp,NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLERRWATER 1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING KEY '~\ MEDJOOL DATE PALM O LIVE OAK DRAKE ELM CHINESE FAN PALM ® BIRD OF PARADISE ~ VIBURNUM ~ MUHLY GRASS O LOROPETALUM O HIBISCUS O PLUMBAGO ® JUNIPER TREE PROTECTION +J u Eas uuxi RECWNix PVfEUxrtLL WmMIFAnncxaomanwl4~na it 0.~0.as!sf mucxEiFn. iiES rtsxxu BEUWnWFW i0. a[u0.xn<u>:c[ia+waev 5~ +0.lwwmn:Rm ~mi0. maEUMERamrsr4+FYS'M~FNU1WnF5 xJiE to 6E iatiuimrnxxx~o iFFT bl ux xwuuuw vau ee mx~rvflouuu'¢0.+aE[afnu+'E pwxo oEeFrwx4ln. x.. 1 I Tree Pro[eRion ~«. 1 5 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATE R RESIDENCE INN CDURT ST. CLEARWATER, FL PREPARED FOR; The Clarkson Group ~~g PREPARED 0Y: WllSQ7fM/BeIIiP.$(l,/A WilsonMiller, Inc. rrnieaauxufi~ IN COOPERA770N WITH: a KBJ An:hNects, Inc. • ROPo0.~ NEx+5T1XAiM WTI t 1T NOT fOR CON6IRUCIION SCALF: NTS DATE: fEBRUANV 24, 2006 PIN: 05211-001-000 LP-502 1 2 3 W Q H U w a a ORIGINAL LEGEND RECEIVED Trea to 06 Sava4 ~Eree R ~ Trea carlapy MAC 0 6 2006 A Trea to lte Removo4 OBH TT hlnchas ~Tree^ , renca NMmaer a E to 1 7 Tree Canopy PiANNING DEPARTMENT ~~Trea BarAcetla CITY OF CLE:P:RWATER I : 3 W a >_z W NORTH 4 5 LANDSCAPE TABULATION: TREES RETAINED CANOPY TPEf3. ] uwr Ics 6.i~o1 PuT a-5 P.om Im mw.l TAL taEdr 115 in. TREES REMOVED unoPY TREfs.60... nw 6Knn.r PAlf6S-6 P+iAn I6t 6rNe) n 192 b. TREES REQUIRED o9 2 - 115 e ToTAt Nilw.l TOTAL CREOrt IW.I iM RfowREO 77 N. TREES PROVIDED TYPE TOTPL NOHES PRONOEO TOTAL iNCI<S PAONOED OrW Eon 77 zs xo ror.%PROSn~o 126 in. nET e1CNES ~ 4B h. PARKING AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REA (COMMERCIAL): ta5608F PPOURFO WIERIOR LPNWCAPf AREA 110%F 16565E RoHOfo wn:woR UnosCwPE ~wEn n6.5%4 5.xmsF PPIWNG CKCUTAnON TOTAL REOUIREO 115 sPACES TOTAL PROVIOEO. 166 SPACES NOTE: Refer to Wntlscape tletaR sheet for protective bar6ier requirements. Refu to Me suomittal package (noteoook) for the eNorisis tree evalueaon. 1 I s DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN COURT ST. CLEARWATER, FL PREPARED FOR: The Clarkson Group PREPARED BV: ~IsOnMi11er0es7gn WilsonMiller, Inc. _ N.NERMANAOFR ~n IN COOPERATION WITH: r,ti err:: KBJ Architects, Inc. • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1 =30' DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2006 PIN; 05211-001-000 LD-401 ~I i E%. -+ ~- ^^ 'G \/ -G z ~, ~Z. C~ m~ ~ ~ m ~ r --~ mm ~ G GZ ~~ o F v~ ~~ ~ ~ rn m .Yi Z E 3 4 S 2 3 DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER RESIDENCE INN ~~ n. dFARWATFR R PREPARED FOR: The Oarlson Group PIEPARED BY: ~IsQnM111erDes7gn WihonMilla, Int nntRwiuraa~i:wrm"'o ~ Ri CDOPERA710N WR/i: KBJ Architects, Inc. ~ \ A DALE: FEBRUARY M.100fi v 'o PIN: 05211-001-000 \ m NORTH I 5 -v n~ -~ Z T ~Z rT1 CT ~ m~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ mm „~ m. ~ ~ No ~ D ~ ~ ~~ m m ~Z pLp,NNING DEPARTMENT CI ~`I pF CLEARWATER ~ - ~,,~~:' ~ _ ORlGINA: ~~ .'`~ ~ Y ~E~ > ~ 20~~ ~ ~LA~i{~INC QEPARTME CITY OF CL~AR'tNHTE ~. ':. ~;. ~~J • fA~' r- RC! now '~'' y. - . ~~, S nac ~'~' "'- nca ~" t „~,.s icy y . ORIGINAL RECEIVED F~a ~ ~ zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NORTH ELEVATION - --,- - -. _ __ ~ I- O ~ 1 ImI Im1' 'm f I _ ~ ` ImI m o m m ~ m m~ ~~ ,, ®m ; m m m ~ __ m o m ~ u~ m . ~m ~ ~ ~ .m m u m m . mm -~ . m m - - m -_ ~ iii .I - ~'`~~". I' -- _ ~ ~ ~ - ®.:, li - ORIGIN,41 RECEIVED FEE3 2 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SOUTH ELEVATION 1^ - ~ 6T ~__ ~ rD MON~ a ~T_,q. 7E~F.NIN ~i„~ o. y_ ,N 9111M f70GM `~ -e~ ~, n h R Jcs ~: -~ :.:.~, ~~:~ .~ _ ri.z__._ nwo•uYw S' .; _ a .T_~ y«„ , ,:~y 0 ti o n ;a ~^ ® ~ ~ ' ' ~' " 57'- - - . , ~ '~, YVEMIH fi m ~~_. _ 1 N':JL __ - 4tW ILPA ~ m gy, it00k _ ~, G7 ® CSO ~ -- ©~®- -.o,~.... -- ®~® - ~-,~y ;~:,: s ~ ~ ~~-k ~ _-- ~:- _ _ ti EAST ELEVATION ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 2 nS 2006 'CANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER _. WEST ELEVATION ~~.~ F n. n -,~-~ ,r a COLOR 1 ~E D D N G vE ~ 2125- 70 COLOR 2 THUNDERCLOUD GREY 2124-40 COLOR 3 ORIGINAI- RECEIVED FEB 2 ~~ 2006 plAl`ININC' DEPARTMENT CIZ`( OF CLEARWATER STONE HARBOR 2111-50 CANOPY BURGUNDY EABR C ,~~-_~~ =~~ ~ ~ = ~ BASE .K _~ ~~~"~.y - =t.:~~ STONE BASE -~~,~~~i~i-~ i~ O D C H CAS 0 ALL COORS TO MATCH BENJAMIN MOORS COLORS SAMPLES 1-3 • • • +-s ... ~ ~ ' ~ . + : ,. _ ~ 's y. ,~•f j u ' , ~~ `. + +,N. G + r '' d. • • J. ~.kS Yf, ~11. t ~ ti ~ LT- _ a,~ ~ ' ~~ ~ • • * ~ . . ' + Y ~' ~ ~ 1 - 1 . 1 - 11' '`~Y. f ~' Z~... ? .~ ,.. „fit a ~, ~..• ~.•~ :~4~~ a t ~ •,-' =. fw _ ~ ~ ~ ~ '• f ~ _ Z 1 ~ is ~,' ~ j 'r - r~ '/ • r. ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 2 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEP.RWATER ~- CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, May 16, 2006, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Windward Passage Condo LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval in the High Density Residential District to reduce the rear (north) setback from 15 ft to 3 ft (to pool deck - where a 13-ft rear pool deck setback was previously approved) for a previously approved attached dwelling project (FLD2003-11059, approved by the CDB on May 18, 2004), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.F. (Proposed Use: Revised pool deck location fora 55-unit attached dwelling project) at 202 Windward Passage, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5, Blk D, Lots 10-13 and Part of Lot 9 & Tract. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-03012 2. Senior Citizens°-Services--(James Holt-The Clarkson Group) are requesting Flexible Development request to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Sec 2-903 of the Community Development Code, and to allow 4 parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles__along_South Prospect and Ewing Aves. (Proposed Use: Overnight Accommodations) ate 940 Court St,,Coachman Heights Rev, Blk C, Lots 1, 11-12 & S %2 ofyac~Ilaven-_St on_N~ ~Pt of Lots 2, 3, & 13. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2006-02010- - 3. Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Svc Inc is requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a single family home in the Medium Density Residential District with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, per Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1220 Pennsylvania Ave, Palm Park, Blk C, Lot 8. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-02004 4. Renaissance Oaks LLC (Gus Di Giovanni) are requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a 6 ft tall residential subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Rd, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Sec 2-104.D. (Proposed Use: 43 Detached Dwellings) at 2275 McMullen Booth Rd Sec 33-28-16, M&B 32.02. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD20066-02005 5. Church of Scientology Flag Svc Org Inc and Arnold Brown Properties are requesting Flexible Development request for amixed-use development consisting of 156 attached dwelling units, 63 overnight accommodation (hotel) units with ancillary facilities, 1,360 sq ft of retail floor area, and 17,660 sq ft of indoor recreation/entertainment facility (museum) floor area within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (Attached Dwellings, Overnight Accommodations, Indoor Recreation/Entertainment Facility, and Retail Sales and Services)] at 121 N Osceola Ave, and 118 N Ft Harrison Ave, Sec 16-29-15, M&B 12.01, 12.04 & 12.06. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-09103 9~v ~~akQT FLD2006-02 80 ALL AROUND YOUR HOME INC BACHMANN, FREDERICK S PO BOX 413 1006 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0413 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5632 BRYAN, EDWARD P JEMAL, CLAUDIA 814 FRANKLIN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5514 BRYANT, RUTH 821 JEFFORDS ST # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4077 CASLER, DORA M 1002 E TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5638 CHESTNUT COURT CONDO ASSN CHESTNUT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CICERO, VICTOR S CICERO, CAROL A 405 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5711 COURT STREET CONDO ASSN COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DENNIS HERNANDEZ & ASSOC 3339 W KENNEDY BLVD TAMPA FL 33609 - 2903 FINCHUM, TRAVIS D FIVE PALMS 901 CHESTNUT ST STE B CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5618 GENROC GROUP 639 CLEVELAND ST # 340 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4188 CCI HOLDINGS 901 CHESTNUT ST STE A CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5618 CHESTWOOD PARTNERSHIP 911 CHESTNUT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5643 CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTH PO BOX 960 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0960 COURT STREET TOWNHOMES LLC P O BOX 270847 TAMPA FL 33688 - 0847 E Z HOME LOANS INC 7720 WASHINGTON ST STE 105 PORT RICHEY FL 34668 - 6540 FOX, DONALD REALTY INC 915 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5744 GILBERT, RONALD K ADELMAN, JUDITH 354 FOSTER LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1625 ie r ~BACHMANN,~FREDERICK S 1425 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5312 BUTLER, JOSEPH A BUTLER, BARBARA A 821 COURT ST # 821 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5501 CHEEK, MICHAEL C 480 POINSETTIA RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1081 CHRISTOPHER, THOMAS P 1750 BRAXTON BRAGG LN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1101 COPELAND, EDNA COPELAND, ALBERT 1479 BUGLE LN CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2542 DADETTO, ALLAN J 811 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5501 FAUBION, GERALD C FAUBION, CHRISTINE D 3073 LUSITANA DR LIVERMORE CA 94550 - 9684 FRANCIS, JOSEPH FRANCIS, ROSE B 3665 EAST BAY DR # 204-206 LARGO FL 33771 - 1990 GREENWOOD MEDICAL AND REHAB CT S GREENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HALISKY, JAN G HARTE OF FL TITLE SVCS INC HASAN, ASEM HALISKY, MARY J 11602 MONETTE RD 4619 RUE BORDEAUX 305 ORANGEWOOD AVE RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 4602 LUTZ FL 33558 - 5365 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5741 ~_ HAZELWOOD, MAXWELL G THE NEARBY COMMUNICATIONS INC 430 LARBOARD WAY STE 1 10TH FLR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2153 1345 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK NY 10105 - 0302 HOTMIRE, HARRY E 907 CHESTNUT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5643 HUGHES PLUMBING SUPPLY LTD 501 WEST CHURCH ST ORLANDO FL 32805 - 2247 KEHRER,JOELJ 1561 BEVERLY DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2501 KELLER, KLAUS A KELLER, JOAN M 1615 SAINT PAULS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6451 KUYKENDALL, DAVID B 1000 COURT'ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5747 LEVENREICH, DAVID 406 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5759 NAEGELE, ELLEN 910 E TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5636 PARTNERS IN SELF SUFFICIENCY I 901 CHESTNUT ST STE E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5618 R G B ICE INC 9105 TARLETON CIR BROOKSVILLE FL 34613 - KEHRER,JOELJ MC KINLEY, FRANK L 205 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - KELLER, KLAUS 1615 ST PAULS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6451 LARRY, ZAMY LARRY, KELLY 1106 BROWNELL ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5702 LIKMETA, ALI LIKMETA, SHERIFF 9 N CIRUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3102 NEWSPAPER REALTY CO CLW 214NTRYONST CHARLOTTE NC 28202 - 1078 PATTERSON, ESTELLE 508 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5608 RATTRAY, CHRIS L 2974 COUNTRY WOODS LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6452 w HELO INC 439 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2139 J B P PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 1368 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1368 KNIGHT, JAMES P 509 HARBOR DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3253 LAWRENCE, NANCY G THE 439 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2139 MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 NEWSPAPER REALTY CO CLW 214 N TRYON ST CHARLOTTE NC 28202 - 1078 PROSPECT TOWERS OF CLEARWATER 801 CHESTNUT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5626 RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES I 503 ML KING JR AVE S # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5607 REMBERT, JAMES C RODRIGUEZ, REINALDO S P GREENWOOD DIAL, RUTH 1400 OVERLEA 25400 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 154 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3425 2896 ARMADILLO DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2150 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6401 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES 940 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5745 SIGN CONCEPTS INC 304 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5757 T M S PROPERTIES LLC 521 S MARTIN L KING JR AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5607 THACKER, O S WILDER, FRED J PO BOX 1808 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1808 WALLACE, ALFRED WALLACE, PERCY 409 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5711 Michael English, Wilson Miller, Inc 1101 Channelside Dr, Ste 400N Tampa, FL 33602 • SERVCO INC 2209 HIGHLAND WOODS DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9407 SILVERMAN, MARC A THE BERMAN, ELIHU H THE 509 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5607 TACK & WARREN INC 803 PIERCE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5525 TSAMIS, DENO THE TSAMIS, MINA THE 3234 HYDE PARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1813 WE CARE FASHIONS INC 807 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5509 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Sondra Kerr, President P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, FL 33758 r SHERMAN, MARTIN J SHERMAN, RHONDA RENEE 3109 CARTER AVE MARINA DEL REY CA 90292 - 5508 STURGEON, DAVID W STURGEON,JOANN 1000 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5638 TACK 8~ WARREN INC 806 PIERCE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5526 UNDERWOOD, RAYMOND 519 MARINA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5042 James Holt, The Clarkson Group 3100 University Blvd, S Ste 200 Jacksonville, FL 32216 ~ ~ , .-; ._ s,- ~ , r` - 2778 • 278A a >087 is "z4ai3,~z < ~ "s ~ € ~~ ; g m 2 3 4 s 7 e ~ ~ R $ _ 2788 1 s - - yo ~~ ~_@ e9 I: ~ $~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r CITY OF CLEARI9ATER 0 R C es yy ree !s L'\ ~1 PIIfEIl.A.9ro00011 1~ PL09NA »~ar ~.~ „ - R DREVr R c7 ~t t s S ~ fi'eR , T AR. 590 PREPARCD BY 651 }21 sp 5 3 ~2"'t zm t " 5 ° ~m. ~~•¢•,~••. e¢°. m g s' ae ~ _ ° .aa tt 9 E R , r ~~~~~~$~ ~ ~ PUBWC WORcN E0NCNISTRAT]ON I~ 22/01 r!e IJe 6 7 I!t ~ 3 2 1 ' T . I '/ ~ 100 S. My ib Aw„ Ckarwoln, fl 33756 7 t t z z z I~ zz/o2 rse Ie ur < 7 rs,.: (ml)s62-<7sD, faa: (bt~ ~z9 n~s 7 8 9 0 1 2 < g BIJO is 1 8 m g7$ xep 9 tD w» ~Ob z nlfp;//w,».ckarwol<r-n.com boar % 6 H G E z t 70 'y Jrt Joe 5 g # S ¢ in " °..» ri ~. rib 0 a Jn 019Nmmn: ~ Pudlp InfoIm011pn Gala I! 1uml9ne0 Dy the Clty or Clearwoler K e roe. esa u Pr 7 STREET a R ~e ~ ~ ~ '(e /q I PuDllc wor9a Admh4tr°Ibn/EngMex,nq, a d must ys cepte0 roe ~ E 0 tJ ~' C JJ IJl one used Dy the reelPlenl wllh the underalondhq Ihpl oche dolo 6 5 d 7 2 1 2 '~ ~ a~ 10 ~ aeelvwe voa eoilecled fa the Purpose °r devNOPhq o graphic 5 3 t I e I e 9 7 It -3 7} 7a ~2Z/o5 2J I z a roo g.~» ~a io°i NOOltmcmr. m.<~lory. A9 :a n, the cny ar ck9r"o,<r PwA/E I ~ N a • ' t I me9u no wmonltas, esprseaed or Impned. concernlnq lne Q t ml I peturxy. eomdelentes. MlaDlllly, p sultobllHy of thb dolo !or td is is = SARAOH ~ 22/os 5 e 7 a ~ w "' am efhb panmatar me. Turlharmore, the cny ar naarwat<r ~ s cAtU EN tD» " ~„ "= t 3 PwA a9wme9 no Ito9eR /~ y whal9oever PseMaled wRn the use QQ 8 a mhule or wcn eatP. @ F 1 ~ 6 rR< ~ Y e ¢ 9 1 QIOVE SIRFET R ~ ~ ~ ~; R IAUiA R R STREET g ,. 4 C R th6 Aua9 Paq< la aue~j<af to perloak enangn. s p ~ - Tn inramatlan afiout mte9t revisions Pleose can Pws I AicMULLrEN .. ti t J „ 7 q p e 7e v1911 oar wm !fi<. ~ ar ^3 2 t ~ 9 8 7 2 I< ~ a t 7 e w ar . a s . r as 18 17 re 8 9 m tom =• f 2 3! 5 8 7 8 9 t 7Z 70 7 '~ 10 ~ L-aL ~ H 8 5 7 5 4 5~ 7 B B tt 10 9 ~. e 6 S 1 3 2 7 72 ~ a° S 8 $`V `r~A ~ ~ ae d b ~ ~ I L'~ ~ ' ggtt 10Y 8 I $ w ~ e R $ ~ Y ~~ Y I ClF9ElANp g R R 8 8 C ~~' '. $ ,~, 8 a E p & w ~ ~ s'~T AR. 60 C I $ 0 100 200 400 600 $ 8 } 2 1^ ~ I M 1 O < S 6 7 B t Z 3 4 5 8 7 8 1 '~ ae P D t- ~ d ~ ul SCALE: t" 400• (i O ~ t Z 3 4 S .~ ~ tp8 19 IO 21 22 2 e t8 75 t4 tl 72 tt 10 S Z1/vi tt ot5 ?6 r^7 w78 [ l B 9 10 9 Z 19 18 f7 16 15 13 72 tt Y ~ 21/02 to 14 L-aL 76 6 27 t °g Im J$ `8 S 8 FL - O - 3 m 1S 7 m 21/03 a 26'P 25 LEGEND: a" = 8 ~ S PARK , ~ ° tt B 27/01 .78 S _ 29 G 30 37 Je I m ,ie'. n 2Z/09 S tZ ~ ~ ro 17/06 4 ~ 35 34 R ~ 33 32~ I ~_ CO ~'} a 5 I m ~t 5 ~6 ; ~ g t0 71 t ~ /2 3 8 I n5 y~ 11 10 27 /OS RM - 36 37 38 ~ 31 N -O BLOCK NUMBER ~ f,- a Ioo IT K ~ E ror 76 A_ 7 7 78 spi $ 9 • r ' ij 3D J 1234 LOT ApDRESS 3 ~ e < _ y~ ~ 7 6 i~ 2' Z1 t6 t5 73 < ror 1 2 t7 1 I z 17 m4• .a 7 8 5 3 2 1 S~ ~<~ 2 r t 8 W ~~~~~ CITY LIMITS LINE 1B / p 1d 3 IB J0 3 18 ~ 10 7 ~ ~ _f ~ I t , 9t! 8 8 6 4 • SSS< vA[ R R Voco ed PIE CE ST I IJ ay r"T1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY P~ E ~ L""'~ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS cl I too ^ AERCE C SiRECT 5 20 R ~ S /,~22 ~ C8 9 0 tit ® S tt B 1 73 7 1719 21 J~ y~i3y~ '~ 3 reJ + 6 2t pJ Z6 ZS 2 k b 4- 2 < g t0 1Z 1t to 1B 20 ~ rs y ~ AGREEMENT TO ANNEX d 5 ~ J I u 23 2Z 7 23 ear rm Ze iI~ w. nn-m i a ni! • CITY OWNED PROPERTY B I 7 6 or ,. 9 _ _ irr 27 3 iia «I ~ Irn ,~ 1O° ° a < t 4tw ab rm I m ti . ~ MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ~ I a to 25 ra tD r" roe ~ ror O Z 7 r10oi / p ~ ~. CL R R FR STREET R - - 26 ~ iri ! 11 p 3 ^ ~ ~! rat I Q~ ® yh I~~ 20NE LINE O 11 ,~ Z7 r 1Z I7 ~ ~ 2 100 I `` . I Q e+"" 2 2 b wr 6 . 3 4 5 I +II t3 ° Z8 rJ! 73 N 2e A rrp I ~' a o< 71 Z9 a td 1e 2 3 1 rJr ~ a U t5 d 30 ° [,~ yp, » I V roe 75 C 30 <pp ur m ~ t !Je t2 11 70 9 ® so J Y rrtzowwc a iB 7 6 " vIL s/n/92 ® t ~9 e 0 - 9 7 8 5• 7 2 8 i t m ssm o/av/v 74 ~ , 6 1 17 Ps 1 1I I9< Y w 20 ~... e • .~ ®a9t. OE/ry/96 1Z 2 ! - mts• a ! 73 ~ 8 COURT t ~ ~ IPr t $ ~ F ~ t 7 ~ >I r,>r y f n ~ S 3 ~ JJ - 7 er 1 17 ~ e E ~~ ~~ 23 24 25 k e '• ~• eo 14 t t4 73 f4 tt 70 y0e 16 t7 to q S ~ e~5 w N 1 !a pr 7 9 it t5 m ZO ~ Z2 • 3 a 3 d g 19 COVET 5 °y 14 q! S 1e < ar B 5 ~ 6 1e 6 78 <ro nI 2 ~ t e s t o a e 7 a s t 31'i w roe O LOT NUMBER - R.H. . ~Z-1° ° 7 ~ N t3 N tl 72 tt to 9 + PADGETT'S SUB. HS-27 7 e 7 s A 77 7 n ro 3~$3 ~y § m g u U >d ~ e 8 76 ra 8 18 ~1 R Y tcE F~~ ~ ~ , < • 9 19 d~ dP y 19 ~ Syl ' L - 12 LL8- ® S - - 8 7 eo z R e __ to 201 M.~+e 8 l e a +D n t ~ e e 17 e y ~t 3 s9 a REVISED: -~~T s r R ,w HO .,ae... $ ~ 10/26/99. wa' 8 g n o ~ a~ C' ua>s"" R ~"n R R ZONING ATLAS ePt ~ ~ 37 t0 a to ~ 31/11 37/08 ~ _ ~ e 2958 296A £ Nw 1/a of sECnoN ~ Q ~ ^ 2968 ~ 15 - 29 S - 15 E U /-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~I'li! rr.-.. ~~i111~ zip 7 t -~ r C~ ~~ _rX.i ~tx,_~~~ v_~_a.,t~ a. ~.hancu,~ ar~dx Qase • ~~~a~c s Ro~~ " ~~ L ~ ~~ III • • ~< ~~~ =m~e m~ ~ - a _~J Uhl. -7D ` ~- J!1(/_rNP~ (I fD I~ 0 ro~9se~t S~?ac.~=as+ --1~'D~/, 5~ Itiyat ~le~' - - "L IV_I_~(e- tn^-~ra5 ~_ ~ Ro-~ ~- ~. ~'~? _1• • • NN.i7 (~?~I haw b~~sn -~ d- _~' s,~ (off ' -,~.~~' _~0.0' ~ eel , ~e n_c~.~ S , r .' u~.e.w~,2,~. w~ ~~ - l csl~f~n-~ .~uJ_~n ~ .- ~ ~~.~ ~.r Ip~ue ~i~~ ~ S s1oa,~s (jm . f vr~lfav2rraa~"s ~' ~~ ~ 1 ..,-._~ .3~ vn~~s - ~IS~~~1s-