Loading...
FLD2006-04023I> ~. i , `,LL _° Clearwater ~J Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Floirida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1,205.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed Clearwater Centre, LLC _1100 Cleveland Street, Suite 90i 72747-2398 FAX NUMBER: 727-442-0492 Guy & Susan Bonneville, Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, Anthony Dorner --- _. _ .FtTGINgL AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road-E--., Suite 404, Safety_Harbor, FI 34695 ____ PHONE NUMBER: 727_793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727_783-9855 CELL NUMBER: -727.244709 _____ ___-_-_._ __ E-MAIL ADDRESS: Keith@KeithZ ~ 0 9 2006 ------------------- - __ _PLANNING D CTTY OF CLI B. PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Clearwater Centre PROJECT VALUATION:' $ 2.48 AC See Attachment "A" PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 108,080 SF PROPOSED USE(S): gg Condominium Units and 21498 SF of Commercial Space - DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Attachm_ent_"B"_ _ Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square -------------------------------------_..-----------------_------------- footage of non-residential use and all _ _ requested code deviations; e.g. - ---- -- reduction in required number of ---- ----._____-______-..__ _ - parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 - , rF DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~~9~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. l~' 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment "C" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment "C" 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attachment "C" 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment "C" 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment "C" 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment "C" - ~RtrtNAt"- -- ---- -- - ------ -- - -------------RE.CEl1!~a------ ------------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------- fF'f ~U~--~~-~ ------ PciN of ci~w C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS--1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.Oi.doc Page 2 of 8 ~ T w WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) • f1~ A1~P Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Attachment "D" 2. he development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Attachment "D" 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Attachment "D" -- - --- ------ ---- _ - -- ------------- -DRIf;INA1. - -------------------- -- -- ~:~I~~ 4. p p Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. JUIV ~ 9 2~U6 -- ---- - - ---------------------- - ---------PiA1VIVIN~L~ARTIOfENT --------- ---- - ---Elie(-0f-C-Lff~RiAfAifi~- L5.~ The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Attachment "D" ~6 ~ Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See Attachment "D" C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 3 of 8 ~' ~` LJ , E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ~ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must incude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptti~l~luirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. RECENED ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ,DUN o 9 206 ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading inducting finished floor elevations of all structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT ^ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; CITY Of CLEARWATER ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, tce of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, tce of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _~~,/_ stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ~ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not ', deviations to the parking standards are approved; ~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN--I.BREILOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infitl Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 4 of 8 M C7 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; __ _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; __ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, stone and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ___ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. __ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ _ _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, __ expressed in square feet R percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); EXISTING 108,080.94 SF (2.48 AC) 0 Units 0 Units_ _ 151,000 SF (Commerclal)_ 164 ORIGINAL RECEIVED .~U~1 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIRED PROPOSED N/A _ 108,080.94 N/A _ N/A N/p 88 Units _ N/A 21,498 212 Spaces _ 213 Spaces 86,396.02 SF (80%) N/A 10,997.99 SF (11%) Utility Easement (O.R. 4231, PG. 1400), Drainage 8 Utility Easement O.R. 4755, PG. 1553), 10_FPC Easment tD.R. 5821, PG. 1766) _ 155' 30' __ 155' PLUS 21'x" 0.89 ISR N!A 0.78 1.40 FAR ___- NIA ____--_ 0_19____ _ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:IDOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 5 of 8 N w H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side scopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required ____ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ __ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ ___ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and __ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and ___ percentage covered; __ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; ORIGINI~ RECEIVED ____ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; JUN 0 9 2046 Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); _ Materials; PLANNING DEPARTMENT __ Sight visibility triangles; CITY Of CLEARWATER ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 '/s X 11. - f~' J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ~f,~~~ ~~~`~.~~~ ~:,r~~ (_ ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inGuding location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN~I.BRE\LOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 6 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANNING ~ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or rf the proposed development: CIN OF • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all __ ~,/ `roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _~~{'~J~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe1~nd/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida iCire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Bement of fire flow calculations/waterstndy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/WaterStndy is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requiremehts, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and ubscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by t ,who is personally known has r uc~d i n cation. Notary public, My commission expires: C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS~1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 7 of 8 w ORIGINAL RF[`~n~n N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: JUN 0 9 2006 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Guy & Susan Bonneyille___- _ ___________________._______ _ _ _ .. _ _ - . C1TY-OE_CLEA~INATER Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner Anthony Dorner ________ _ 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1100 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FI 33755 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See Attachment "E" for List of Requests __-_____ ______ _- _ _ 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: --Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A.---- ------------------- - -------- as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and ad on the a bove described property; ~ 6. , That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this appli do °and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true qnd corre t. p s~/ l/ Property Owner Property Owner _ \ ---Property Owner --~- ~~ -- -----------------Property Owner --- - TAT OF FLORIDA, ~ COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed- Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 8 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~N 0 9 2006 Attachment A p1ANNING DEPARTMENT Legal Description(s) CITY OF CLEARWATER Parcel 15-29-15-03060-001-0010: property containing 91,411 sf, or 2.10 acres MOL and 15-story building commonly known as Clearwater Centre, 1100 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 Lots 1 thru 14 inclusive, Lot 15, less the East 23.0 feet thereof, all in Block "A", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. LESS the West 10.0 feet of said Lot 1, deeded to the City of Clearwater for right-of--way purposes. Lots 1, 2, 10 and that part of Lots 3 and 4 which lie West of a Southerly extension of the Westerly line of the Easterly 23.0 feet of Lot 15, Block "A", (of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida), LESS the East 23.0 feet of said Lot 4 thereof, all in H. A. KILGORE'S SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 58, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Vacated portion of NE Cleveland Street (66.0 feet width) described as follows: That portion lying between. Blocks "A" and "B" of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: From the most Easterly corner of Lot 25, of said Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, said corner being on the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street, run thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along saidright-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run South 84°10'09" East, 99:84 feet to a point on the Southeasterly right-of--way line of said NE Cleveland Street; thence run South 58°27'00" West, along said Southeasterly right-of--way line, 33.81 feet; thence continue, along said Southeasterly right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 310.43 feet to a point, said point being on the Southerly extension of a line lying 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown adjacent to Block "B" of said BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION; thence run North 00°12'00" West, along a line 10.0 feet East of a parallel to the Southerly extension of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown on said Block "B", 84.68 feet to the Northwesterly right- of-way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence run North 51°00'30" East, along said right- of-way line, 220.09 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 15-29-15-03060-002-0090: property containing 16,670 sf, or 0.38 acres MOL Lots 9 thru 25 inclusive and that part of Lot 50, described as follows: Begin at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 50 for the Point of Beginning; thence run North, along the West line of said Lot 50, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9; thence East along the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 9 to the Northerly line of said Lot 24; thence Southwesterly, along the Northerly line of said Lot 24, to the Point of Beginning, all in Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS the following described tract: Begin at M N the Northwest corner of said Lot 11 for the Point of Beginning; thence run South 42°19'40" East, 14.91 feet; thence South 84°10'09" East, 248.03 feet to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 25, said corner being on the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along said right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet; thence North 84°10'09" West, 152.60 feet; thence South 47°48'56" West, 26.76 feet to a point 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue; thence South 00°12'00" East, along a line of 10.0 feet East of the parallel to the East line of Greenwood Avenue, 136.01 feet to the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 51°00'30" West, along the Northwesterly right-of--way of NE Cleveland Street, 12.83 feet to the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue, 235.10 feet to the Point of Beginning. (For right-of--way purposes for realignment of NE Cleveland Street and for widening of Greenwood Avenue.) ORIGINAL RECENED JUf~ 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER ATTACIIlVIENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS 1. Increase in building height from 75 ft. to 155 ft. plus 21.5 ft "high hat". 2. Termination of existing non-conforming building height 3. Reduction to the required sight visibility triangles to building. 4. Mixed use facility including 88 single family residences and 21,498 sf of commercial space. The project will provide a total of 213 parking spaces including those in the garage and adjacent surface parking. 5. Providing 26 parking spaces within off-street parking lot north of NE Cleveland Street. 6. Reduction of parking lot pavement setbacks to 5.0 ft minimum in parking lot north of NE Cleveland. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~ ATTACHMENT C A.APPLICANT Clearwater Centre LLC 1100 Cleveland Street, Suite 900 Clearwater, FL 33755 TEL: (727) 447-2398 FAX:(727) 442-0492 E-M: gmbonne@comcast.net i OWNERS: Sebastian and Elizabeth Dorner, Guy and Susan Bonneville, Anthony Dorner B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Description of Request(s): PROJECT OVERVIEW Owner/Developer proposes to rehabilitate and change the use of its one-hundred, fifty thousand (150,000) square foot, fifteen (15) story commercial office tower building located at 1100 Cleveland Street on parcel numbers 15/29/15/03060/001/0010 and 15/29/15/03060/002/0090 consisting of 2.1 acres and 0.38 acres, respectively, (see legal descriptions in Exhibit A), in the Town Lake Residential District, into an up-scale, yet affordable, mixed-use, condo /retail /office environment with eighty-eight (88) residential dwelling units comprised of seventy-one (71) units in the tower and seventeen (17) townhome units on the second and third levels of a new 3-story building along the south, west, and northern perimeter of the property surrounding the tower. A total twenty-one thousand, four-hundred, ninety-eight (21,498) square feet of non-residential space will be included in the project as commercial retail and office spaces. Six-thousand (6,000) square feet of the non-residential area is reserved for commercial office and the remaining fifteen-thousand, four-hundred ninety-eight (15,498) square feet may be used as retail and/or office. The street-side retail shoppes are planned for several services- oriented, retail operations such as a beauty salon, deli, pastry shoppe, coffee shoppe, trendy clothing boutiques, housewares, etc. to promote pedestrian traffic and retail business into the area. The project will provide a total oftwo-hundred thirteen (212) parking spaces based on the requirement of one-hundred, thirty-two (132) spaces for residential (i.e. 1.5 times 88 dwelling units), eighteen (18) spaces for commercial office (i.e. 3 spaces per 1,000 SF), and sixty-two (62) spaces for retail (i,e. 4 spaces per 1,000 SF). The new 3-story perimeter building will encircle and conceal a 2-story parking garage containing a total of one-hundred eighty-seven (187) parking spaces for residents and commercial tenants and their public visitors, and the adjacent parcel directly across NE Cleveland Street will provide and additional twenty-six (26) parking spaces providing the total of 213 spaces. • An amenity deck on the east side of the property will provide a heated swimming pool and spa package including private cabanas with wet bars for condominium owners. Reserved, underneath parking spaces will be provided under the amenity deck structure. The streetscape facade for the 2-story commercial building will conceal the amenity deck and the underneath parking facilities. A "half-roundabout" leading to an inclined ramp and aport-cochere is proposed on the back (north) side of the property as the main property entrance for tenant and visitor parking eliminating all ingress/egress from Cleveland Street. An entirely new building streetscape based on the concepts presented in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including paver sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, and a water fountain at the building entrance on Cleveland Street, will be provided along Cleveland Street to the south, Greenwood Avenue to the west, and NE Cleveland Street to the North. Clearwater's Regional Chamber of Commerce borders the property to the east. The parking facilities throughout the project will be hidden or obscured by the new streetscape. We have contracted the firms of Gillett Associates and Keith Zayac & Associates to provide the architectural and engineering services to prepare the architectural plans and provide construction guidance on the project. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL REQUEST In order for our project to become a reality and proceed in the most successful manner, we hereby request the following incentives from the City's Public Amenities Incentive Pool: I. Twenty (20) condominium dwelling units -the density for our property comprised of two (2) parcels of 2.48 acres provides for a total of seventy-two (72) dwelling units. So as to keep our unit sizes within reason and maintain affordability, and to keep condominium fees reasonable for the homebuyer, we have established a plan to provide a total of eighty-eight (88) dwelling units; sixteen (16) more than our density provision. II. Twenty-one thousand, four-hundred, ninety eight (21,498) square feet non-residential space - to improve pedestrian foot traffic and the retail and office business environment within the project area, we propose the project's best use is mixed use, i.e. residential and commercial combined in a packaged, secure environment. The conversion of the existing .building into condominiums eliminates one hundred, fifty thousand (150,000) square feet of run-down, end-of--life commercial office space that previously supported a multitude of distressed clientele. Establishing a new commercial environment of trendy retail outlets will enable us to renew and expand the business climate in our district. III. Parking Dispensation -none required. Of the total of two-hundred, thirteen (213) integrated parking spaces proposed for the project, one and a half (1.5) spaces per dwelling unit, or one-hundred thirty two (132) spaces are provided for residential purposes; three (3) spaces per one-thousand (1,000) SF or eighteen (18) spaces are provided for the six-thousand (6,000) square feet of commercial office tenants; and four (4) spaces per one-thousand (1,000) square feet or sixty-two (62) spaces are provided for the remaining fifteen- thousand, four-hundred, ninety-eight (15,498) square feet for commercial retail tenants and their visitors, for a total oftwo-hundred twelve (212) spaces required. IV. Height Dispensation -our existing tower stands at approximately one- hundred fifty-five (155) feet, well above the current height maximum for our district. The existing roof is a flat-roof design with a penthouse structure that contains the elevator controls, and several wireless (cellular) tenants that have several transmitters and un-sightly antennas protruding from the roof, that will remain after the conversion. We propose to develop a parapet wall structure at the perimeter of the roofline that will integrate these antennas and beautify the roof structure. Additionally, in order to improve the architectural appeal of the project, we propose ahigh-hat roof design as shown in the conceptual drawing attached. Given the current height of our building, we understand we are allowed an additional sixteen (16) feet of height. The proposed high-hat roof will require twenty-one and one-half (21.5) feet above the existing height, thus we request an additional five and one-half (5.5) feet height dispensation. The appropriate elements of our project that support our request for Public Amenities Incentives per the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan are: - Residential uses in the Downtown Plan area through addition of 88 "Downtown" residential, condominium dwelling units; and - Uses in particular locations and/or mixed use projects that further the Plan's major redevelopment goals and character district vision through our mixed use development that provides residential, and twenty one thousand, four hundred and ninety-eight (21,498) square feet of new commercial operations; and - Provision for public parking on site through the addition of ground level, shared, parking in support of public clients visitation to the commercial retail and office tenants; and - Contributions to Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan through the new building Streetscape including paver sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, and a water fountain at the building entrance; and - Rehabilitation and beautification of existing, out-dated, "eye-sore" property; and - Significant reduction in traffic impacts and the closure of two (2) existing ingress/egress curb-cuts along Cleveland Street and one (1) existing ingress/egress curb-cut along Greenwood Avenue. D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. The proposed development is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties as we plan to rehabilitate and transform the existing building structure according to the "vision" indicated in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The planned rooftop high-hat and parapet walls, build-out (fattening) of the lower 10 floors on the east, south and west sides of the building, ornamental banding of the building perimeter at the 45' and 60' height levels, and the addition of the commercial shell on the south and west sides of the property will provide a visually appealing "stepped" height transformation to the surrounding properties. 2. The proposed development will significantly improve the value of the subject property and all surrounding properties and should encourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The transformation of the existing building elevations into a "Mediterranean" style facade will be significantly more pleasing than the existing elevations. The residential component of the development comprised of 88 new, luxury, yet workforce attainable condominium dwelling units will add to the residential core of the Downtown district and the planned commercial retail and office components are sure to attract the much needed "foot-traffic" within the area helping to revitalize the business and economic climate of the location. 3. The current use of the property is vacant and was previously commercial office rental. The majority of the previous office tenancy was governmental in nature and supported clientele with various distresses, including financial (i.e. welfare, social services, etc.), family (i.e. DCF, Coordinated Child Care, etc.), and unemployment/social (i.e. Worknet Pinellas) problems. The nature and scale of the tenant services in the previous use brought together a large contingent of distressed clientele on a daily basis that eroded the value of the property and surrounding area, had a significant impact on area traffic, and created issues of public health and safety. The proposed development will target socially responsible tenants that are financially secure and in general, promote the health and safety of those living and working within the proposed development and those in the surrounding neighborhood. The pricing established for many of the residential units could be classified "workforce attainable." Additionally, as the property is now vacant, the proposed development can only affect the health and safety of persons nearby in a positive manner. 4. The proposed development will significantly minimize traffic congestion and traffic impacts. A previous trip impact analysis completed by the Traffic Engineering Dept. indicates a 25% reduction in daily trips and a 62% reduction in p.m. peak hour trips. Additionally, the 2 existing vehicle ingress/egress points along Cleveland Street and the 1 existing vehicle ingress/egress point along Greenwood Avenue will be closed and redirected to the main entrance along N.E. Cleveland Street and the lower level parking garage entrance along N.E. Cleveland Street. S. The proposed development is consistent and significantly enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the proposed parcel development(s). Streetscaping and the proposed architectural appeal of the proposed development will conform with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, add 88 new residential dwelling units, and add 21,498 sf mixed-use commercial components to engage and foster business growth and foot-traffic to the area. 6. The most noticeable changes of the proposed development will be the significantly enhanced character and visual appeal of the architectural style introduced by the architect, Gillett Associates. Gillett Associates' works have positively influenced and affected several neighborhood improvements within Clearwater, most notably several beach developments including The Grande, Meridian, Mandalay Beach Club, Belle Harbor, and most recently the proposed Sandpearl Resort, a redevelopment of the Clearwater Beach Hotel. Also, as noted above, the reduction of traffic and motorized vehicle trips will improve both the acoustic and olfactory impacts on adjacent properties. • COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - ATTACHMENT D 1. The existing use is vacant but was previously commercial office rental with a significantly high ongoing vacancy. The existing building and improvements were completed in 1972, are outdated, and have outlived their useful and economic life. After reviewing the substantial availability of similar large commercial office vacancy within the immediate area, and the costs of replacing the building's aged infrastructure (e.g. elevators, HVAC systems, tenant improvement costs, etc.), maintaining the property as commercial office rental was economically and financially not viable. For these reasons the redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from its current use. The proposed development will provide significant renovations to the exterior of the existing building, add a parking and amenities deck, 21,498 square feet of new street- side, commercial spaces, and a complete redesign, renovation, and build-back of 88 new residential condominiums and associated amenities, e.g. pool, spa, fitness rooms, social club room, caterer's kitchen, concierge, etc. The end result will add much needed residential space within the Town Lake Residential District providing a significant and new addition to the property tax base, and a commercial infrastructure to promote pedestrian traffic within the area, and support the residential base. 2. The Comprehensive Plan is a compilation of the City's goals, objectives and policies for the future of our city. The development proposal is located in the Town Lake Residential District, and more broadly in the Downtown District, in which the Plan has as its purpose, the establishment of a mixed-use downtown where citizens can live, work, play, and shop in the governmental, entertainment and cultural focal point of the City. The existing building is vacant; therefore the existing development is not operating in accordance with the purpose of the Plan. The development proposal will result in the adaptive reuse of the existing 150,000 square foot, office building property into a mixed use environment, including the addition of 88 new residential dwelling units (i.e. places to live), an amenity floor including a social room, fitness room and pool/spa deck (i.e. places to play) and 22,498 square feet of retail and office operations (i.e. places to work and shop), in a well integrated and packaged format. Additionally, the proposed redevelopment, with the addition of new residents and retail outlets for people to congregate, shop and eat, will generate new pedestrian "traffic" that will help to stimulate the surrounding neighborhoods and further the purpose of the Plan. The form and function of the proposed project is an embodiment of many of the goals and objectives of the Plan and will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity of the proposed project parcel and the City of Clearwater as a whole. A review of the Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified for which the proposed development is consistent: GOAL 2. The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources, ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and encourage infill development. The building is now vacant and outdated, so the addition of new residences and retail spaces to attract people will help to enliven the neighborhood and encourage further infill development and thus the proposed development is consistent with this Goal. Objective 2.1 -The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. The property, in its current state, is clearly a blighted area. The redevelopment will convert this "eye sore" property into a landmark property that will certainly be a catalyst for encouraging increased private development in the downtown area and thus the proposed development is consistent with this Objective. Policy 2.1.1 Redevelopment shall be encouraged, where appropriate, by providing development incentives such as density bonuses for significant lot consolidation and/or catalytic projects, as well as the use of transfer of developments rights pursuant to approved special area plans and redevelopment plans. The proposed development requests additional dwelling unit and non- residential densities and the transfer of development rights which is consistent for such catalytic projects and is thus consistent with this Policy. Policy 2.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs, and maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce and Tourist Development Council. The addition of 22,498 of new commercial spaces, including both retail and office, will add to the business environment, creating new jobs within the downtown and is thus consistent with this Policy. • Objective 2.2 -The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. The proposed development's mixed use configuration including 88 new dwelling units and 22,498 SF of commercial retail and office spaces promotes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment and is thus consistent with this Objective. Policy 2.2.2 The Mixed Use Zoning District shall be utilized to promote mixed use and infill development and shall be consistent with the Residential/Office Limited, Residential/Office General, Residential/Office/Retail, and Resort Facilities High land use categories. The proposed development's mixed use configuration including 88 new dwelling units and 22,498 SF of commercial retail and office spaces is consistent with the Residential/Office/Retail land use category and is thus consistent with this Policy. Objective 16.1 -Adequate Housing -Assure an adequate supply of housing in Clearwater by providing for additional new dwelling units in a variety of types, costs, and locations to meet the needs of the residents of the City of Clearwater. The population of the City of Clearwater is expected to grow to 112,830 permanent residents by the year 2010. To accommodate permanent and seasonal residents and maintain a healthy vacancy rate, approximately 2,500 new housing units will be needed. Large, vacant parcels of land are scarce in Clearwater. Because of this, infill development of small vacant lots and under-utilized parcels will be necessary, and should be encouraged, to provide for new households. The proposed development will add 88 new housing units and thus improves the supply of adequate housing and is thus consistent with this Objective. 3. The proposed development has as its boundaries Cleveland Street to the south, Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue to the west, N.E. Cleveland Street to the north, and the already developed Chamber of Commerce building to the east. The Chamber has indicated the proposed use would be a welcome change for the property (reference SPTIMES article "Downtown office building may go condo" at http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/23/Northpinellas/Downtown office build.shtml. The proposed office/retail/city home/parking addition will provide pedestrian scale development along the abutting rights-of--way and create a buffer between the rights-of- way and the tower. As all abutting properties are either vehicular rights of way or property already developed, the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. It is noted that the surrounding area predominantly consists of one and two-story buildings with a minimal inclusion of three-story buildings, specifically the property located at 1024 Cleveland Street being adjacent to the subject property across Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. As such, the existing 148-foot (15-story) tower is neither in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties, nor is it consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. However, the improvements associated with this development proposal will result in a building that is ~ ~ more architecturally appealing to the surrounding areas, and the provision of the office/retail/parking addition will result in development that is of a pedestrian scale and consistent with the scale, bulk, coverage, and character of the adjacent properties. Based upon the above, the development proposal will result in a significant improvement upon the current state of the subject property and will be more harmonious with the immediate vicinity. The proposed development will significantly improve the fair market value of the existing parcel and abutting properties. The assessed value of the existing improvements within the county tax records is $5'M and the projected value of the site with proposed improvements is upwards of $60'Nl based on the sales revenue proforma; i.e. a 1200% improvement in value. The addition of 88 new dwelling units along with the added retail operations is expected to significantly improve "foot-traffic" in the immediate area, spurring new mixed-use initiatives in the surrounding area. S. Several similar developments or redevelopments are currently planned throughout the City of Clearwater. Unique to this comprehensive infill redevelopment project, not otherwise available within the City of Clearwater, are: a. Existing building and infrastructure that support the proposed development; b. Existing use is financially not viable without the change of use; c. The proposed use is the preferred use for the property; d. The proposed use provides a significant property value increase and improves the tax income to the community; and e. The proposed development is expected to promote additional new redevelopment projects within the surrounding area, which has otherwise not seen any significant improvements in decades. The proposed development will significantly upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The form and function of the proposed project is an embodiment of the goals and objectives of the current Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity of the proposed project parcel and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development provides the addition of 88 new residential dwelling units within a mixed-use environment, which includes street-side and street-level retail operations, in an integrated and packaged format, with streetscaping, suitable public and tenant parking, and an architectural style taken directly from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan documents. The proposed development is permitted in the zoning district as a flexible development use per the following goals, objectives, and policies: Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. The development proposal consists of 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area and 88 • • attached dwelling units within the Town Lake Residential District that will attract residents and visitors to .Downtown. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Goal. ^ Objective lE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. As previously stated, the existing 150,000 square foot office building is vacant. The development proposal will replace the existing square footage with 88 attached dwelling units and ancillary facilities (i.e. lobby, storage, etc.). A building addition will also be constructed around the existing "tower" consisting of 6,000 square feet of office floor area and 15,498 square feet of retail and/or office. The new residences and redesigned commercial floor area will provide a more stable employment center for Downtown residents; therefore the development proposal will be consistent with this Objective. ^ Objective lI: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides for a Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which development proposals may acquire additional non-residential floor area in excess of what the applicable Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) would otherwise allow. This development proposal includes a request to utilize 16 dwelling units and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that will be used to provide ground floor retail as well as office floor area along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The provision of the non-residential floor area will serve to increase the viability and vibrancy of the project. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ^ Objective 2I: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscaping along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue that is consistent with the City's Master streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ^ Policy 1: The Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. The development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines as it incorporates a cementitious finish over concrete block construction with decorative E.I.F.S. trim and accents. The pitched roofs will be clay barrel tile, while the flat roof sections of the building will be accented with decorative parapets. The building design incorporates both vertical and horizontal architectural elements providing relief throughout the elevations and the provision of numerous windows of various sizes and styles. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. • ^ Polio The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. The development proposal is in compliance with the policies governing development within the Town Lake Residential District. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The proposed office/retail/city home/parking addition will establish a pedestrian scale building on the subject property abutting the Cleveland Street, NE Cleveland Street, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue rights-of--way. In addition to the provision ofnon-residential floor area, the development proposal will also provide 88 new dwelling units within the Downtown, and streetscape improvements including landscaping, lighting, pavers, and fountains. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize 16 dwelling units and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Pool. The amenities provided by this development to justify the request include the provision of 88 residential units in the Downtown Plan area and a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the above, compliance with this Policy has been achieved. ^ Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. The development proposal will provide several amenities for the residents, including: a swimming pool with spa, fitness spa, resident storage facilities, clubhouse, and a concierge. Based upon the above, the development proposal has provided sufficient amenities for the scale of the project and is consistent with the above Policy. 6. Lot width, setbacks, and off-street parking requirements of the proposed project will be conforming. The existing building is approximately 155' in height and as-is does not conform to district height requirements. The proposed, architectural "high-hat" roof design will add an additional 21-1 /2 feet to the already non-conforming height, 6-1 /2 feet more than the 20% standard allowance, however without this additional height extension, • • the architectural appeal and transition of heights from roof to upper floors to lower floors to third level deck to street level would not appear uniform or appealing. As the building is practically the tallest building within the downtown vicinity, and visible from all compass points, not allowing the roof to conform architecturally would create a visual imbalance of the project seen from throughout the City. Thus, flexibility in regard to building height is justified by the benefits of the project taken as a whole to community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Adequate off- street parking in the immediate vicinity will be provided according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3. One-hundred thirty two (132) parking spaces, or 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit will be provided for residential tenants and their guests/visitors and eighty-one (81) parking spaces will be provided for commercial tenants and their public visitors for access to the commercial operations for a total of 213 spaces where the shared parking formula shown above shows 187 are adequate. The requested design objectives are met by the proposed development as follows: a) The proposed development has as its boundaries Cleveland Street to the south, Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue to the west, N.E. Cleveland Street to the north, and the already developed Chamber of Commerce building to the east. The Chamber has indicated the proposed use would be a welcome change for the property (reference SPTIMES article "Downtown office building may go condo" at http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/23/Northpinellas/Downtown office build.shtml. The proposed office/retail/city home/parking addition will provide pedestrian scale development along the abutting rights-of--way and create a buffer between the rights-of- way and the tower. As all abutting properties are either vehicular rights of way or property already developed, the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. b) The development proposal consists of two distinct parts: the architectural redesign of the existing 148-foot (to roof deck) high tower, and the construction of the new 47-foot high office/retail/city home/parking addition along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The existing tower's architectural elevations are very stark and the tower does not relate well to the immediate vicinity. The proposed revisions include the outward extension of the lower ten levels on the south, east and west elevations to give the tower step-backs within its elevations, the addition of numerous windows and balconies (tempered glass and aluminum) across the whole of the elevations, the provision of ornamental bandings (stringcourses) at 45 feet and 60 feet in height, and the addition of a "high-hat" atop the tower to provide architectural balance to the building elevations and conceal the elevator overruns and mechanical equipment. The "high-hat" will consist of a barrel the hip roof, while a decorative parapet cap with varying heights will be provided for the balance of the tower. With regard to high-rise buildings, the Design Guidelines state the following: ^ Building stories or step backs differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc; and • ^ A proportional relationship between the height of a building and the number and dimensions of step backs used to mitigate the height of the building. The design of the development proposal is consistent with the intent and direction of the Design Guidelines contained within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The office, retail and city home portions of the new addition will conceal the associated parking garage from view along the abutting rights-of--way. It is noted that within the Design Guidelines there exists a provision that it is appropriate that buildings on corner lots emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments, and/or other distinguishing features. With regard to the proposed office/retail/city home/parking addition, the building will not arrive at or exceed the maximum height stated in the Plan; however the tallest portions of this building are located at the corners of the property. With regard to the site as a whole, the existing/proposed 148-foot tower will provide the emphasis sought by the above referenced provision. Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: Redevelopment Plan was conducted and Objectives and Policies were identified: A review of the Clearwater Downtown the following applicable Visions, Goals, ^ Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal will result in the adaptive reuse of an existing 150,000 square foot office building as 88 attached dwelling units. The development proposal also includes the construction of a pedestrian scale addition consisting of 6,000 square feet of office floor area, 15,498 square feet of retail and/or office floor area, and a 187 space parking garage and 26 space adjacent parking lot. The existing building is vacant; therefore the existing development is not operating in accordance with the above Vision statement. The proposed redevelopment will generate new "traffic" that will help to stimulate the surrounding neighborhoods and further this Vision statement. ^ Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. The development proposal will provide neighborhood and community-scale commercial uses, urban residential dwelling units, a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, and buildings located along and oriented towards the abutting streets. As such, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ^ Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The development proposal will rehabilitate and transform the existing building in a means consistent with the Plan. The redevelopment of the "tower" includes, but is not limited to, the provision of a roof top "high-hat" and parapet walls, the build out of the lower 10 floors on the east, south and west sides of the building, and the • addition of ornamental banding along the building perimeter at 45 feet and 60 feet in height. In addition, atwo/three-level commercial/city home/parking addition will be constructed around the "tower" providing pedestrian level amenities, and giving the existing "tower" the appearance of being stepped back from the surrounding properties. The level of architectural detail being provided in this renovation will transform the existing bland tower into a Mediterranean Revival development that is consistent with the quality urban design envisioned in the above Vision statement. Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. The development proposal provides a total of 213 parking spaces with 187 parking spaces within the on-site parking garage, and 26 parking spaces within the parking lot across NE Cleveland Street. Pursuant to Section 3-1405, when any land, building or area is used for two or more uses that are listed in the shared parking table, the minimum number of required parking spaces shall be determined by multiplying the individual minimum parking requirements by the appropriate percentages listed in the table. The following table depicts the development proposals parking requirement as per the shared parking table: WEEKDAY WEE KEND Use: Midnight 6 A.M. 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 P.M. Midnight 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 P.M. Midnight Residential (44) 100% = 44 60% = 26.4 90% = 39.6 80% = 35.2 90% = 39.6 Residential (88)* 100% = 88 100% = 88 100% = 88 100% = 88 100% = 88 Office (18) 5% = 0.9 100% = 18 10% = 1.8 10% = 1.8 5% = 0.9 Retail (62) 5% = 3.1 70% = 43.4 90% = 55.8 100% = 62 70% = 43.4 Totals (212): 136 176 186 187 172 * The shared parking table takes into account the reservation of 88 parking spaces (1 per unit) for the attached dwelling units. Based upon the above, the development proposal requires a minimum of 187 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 213 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking requirement and the proposed parking is sufficient and is consistent with this Vision statement. ^ Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. The development proposal consists of 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area and 88 attached dwelling units within the Town Lake Residential District. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Goal. ^ Objective lA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The development proposal will provide for 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area • • as part of an attractive mixed-use development. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ^ Objective lE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. As previously stated, the existing 150,000 square foot office building is vacant. The development proposal will replace the existing square footage with 88 attached dwelling units and ancillary facilities (i.e. lobby, storage, etc.). A building addition will also be constructed around the existing "tower" consisting of 6,000 square feet of office floor area and 15,498 square feet of retail and/or office. The new residences and redesigned commercial floor area will provide a more stable employment center for Downtown residents; therefore the development proposal will be consistent with this Objective. ^ Objective lI: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides for a Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which development proposals may acquire additional non-residential floor area in excess of what the applicable Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) would otherwise allow. This development proposal includes a request to utilize 16 dwelling units and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that will be used to provide ground floor retail as well as office floor area along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The provision of the non-residential floor area will serve to increase the viability and vibrancy of the project. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. o Objective 2I: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscaping along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue that is consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ^ Policy 1: The Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. The development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines as it incorporates a cementitious finish over concrete block construction with decorative E.I.F.S. trim and accents. The pitched roofs will be clay barrel tile, while the flat roof sections of the building will be accented with decorative parapets. The building design incorporates both vertical and horizontal architectural elements providing relief throughout the elevations and the provision of numerous windows of various sizes and styles. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to • the vision of the character district in which it is located. The development proposal is in compliance with the policies governing development within the Town Lake Residential District. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The proposed office/retail/city home/parking addition will establish a pedestrian scale building on the subject property abutting the Cleveland Street, NE Cleveland Street, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue rights-of--way. In addition to the provision ofnon-residential floor area, the development proposal will also provide 88 new dwelling units within the Downtown, and streetscape improvements including landscaping, lighting, pavers, and fountains. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize 16 dwelling units and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Pool. The amenities provided by this development to justify the request include the provision of 88 residential units in the Downtown Plan area and a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the above, compliance with this Policy has been achieved. ^ Policy .19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. The development proposal will provide several amenities for the residents, including: a swimming pool with spa, fitness spa, resident storage facilities, clubhouse, and a concierge. Based upon the above, the development proposal has provided sufficient amenities for the scale of the project and is consistent with the above Policy. Town Lake Residential District Policies: The following policies shall govern development within the District, as well as City actions: ^ New construction and renovations of existing single family platted areas in the northeast section of the District shall maintain the character of the neighborhood with regard to lot sizes, setbacks and building height. The. subject property is not located within an existing single-family platted area; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. • • ^ Preferred housing styles north of Laura Street are single family detached duplexes and townhouses. Other styles of attached dwellings may be considered upon assembly of at least one city block. The subject property is not located within the area north of Laura Street; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. ^ One dwelling unit may be permitted as accessory to a single family or two family dwelling provided sufficient parking exists on site. This unit will not be considered when calculating density for the site. The development proposal does not involve either asingle-family or two-family dwelling; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. ^ Community scale commercial uses that serve the general needs of multiple neighborhoods are only permitted on Myrtle Avenue, Cleveland, Court and Chestnut Streets. The development proposal includes the provision of large-scale commercial tenant spaces (ground level retail /second level office) along Cleveland Street that will serve the general needs to the surrounding neighborhoods. Therefore, compliance with this policy has been achieved. ^ Neighborhood scale commercial and office uses that serve the daily or convenience needs of the immediate neighborhood may be permitted on Drew Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The development proposal includes the provision of small- scale commercial tenant spaces (ground level retail /office) of neighborhood scale uses along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. c) The proposed development is located within the Town Lake Residential character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan envisions the district as being redeveloped as a residential district with neighborhood commercial uses and more intense commercial and office development along Myrtle and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenues, and Cleveland, Court and Chestnut Streets. The Plan further states that the addition of new residences in the Town Lake Residential District will enliven Downtown and provide a market for new retail and restaurant development. d) The proposed development forms a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance by incorporating the following design elements: The proposed revisions include the outward extension of the lower ten levels on the south, east and west elevations to give the tower step-backs within its elevations, the addition of numerous windows and balconies (tempered glass and aluminum) across the whole of the elevations, the provision of ornamental bandings (stringcourses) at 45 feet and 60 feet in height, and the addition of a "high-hat" atop the tower to provide architectural balance to the building elevations and conceal the elevator overruns and mechanical equipment. • • The new office/retail/city home/parking addition will conceal the base of the tower, and the office/retail/ city home component of the addition will conceal the parking garage from view. The architecture of the new addition will be consistent with that proposed for the tower, including barrel the hip roofs at varying heights, windows with decorative E.I.F.S. trim, pre-cast simulated stone architectural columns, decorative storefronts with awnings above the entrances, and ornamental "Juliet" balconies for the upper level city homes. The proposed addition will be approximately 47 feet in height at its highest measured point (corner of NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue), while the balance of the addition will be between 33 feet and 24 feet in height. The proposed heights are consistent with the standards set forth in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and will provide pedestrian scale development along the abutting rights-of--way, as well as creating a buffer between these rights-of--way and the existing tower. The color scheme for the development proposal consists of light tan (Navajo White- SW6126) and gold (Blonde-SW6128) for the upper and lower portions of the building, respectively, and pale beige (Egret White-SW2004) for the trim and accents. The balcony railings will be painted bone white. The design of the development proposal is consistent with the intent and direction of the Design Guidelines contained within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The office, retail and city home portions of the new addition will conceal the associated parking garage from view along the abutting rights-of--way. It is noted that within the Design Guidelines there exists a provision that it is appropriate that buildings on corner lots emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments, and/or other distinguishing features. With regard to the proposed office/retail/city home/parking addition, the building will not arrive at or exceed the maximum height stated in the Plan; however the tallest portions of this building are located at the corners of the property. With regard to the site as a whole, the existing/proposed 148-foot tower will provide the emphasis sought by the above referenced provision. e) The proposed development is surrounded by the abutting rights-of--way to the south (Cleveland Street), west (Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue) and north (N.E. Cleveland Street) and thus the proposed office/retail/parking addition, which will provide pedestrian scale development along the abutting rights-of--way, creates a buffer between the rights-of--way and the tower. The property adjacent to the east property line of the proposed development has an existing 2-story building with no windows, doors, or other penetrations on its western exterior wall. The 2 story commercial office facade fronting the pool /spa deck of the proposed development will provide a uniform height transition between the properties and a 10 foot side set-back will be provided as a buffer between the properties. The proposed development will include an enhanced landscape design including high-end plantings, lighting, pavers and fountains consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Exhibit A Legal Description(s) Parce115-29-15-03060-001-0010: property containing 91,411 sf, or 2.10 acres MOL and 15-story building commonly known as Clearwater Centre, 1100 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 Lots 1 thru 14 inclusive, Lot 15, less the East 23.0 feet thereof, all in Block "A", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. LESS the West 10.0 feet of said Lot 1, deeded to the City of Clearwater for right-of--way purposes. Lots 1, 2, 10 and that part of Lots 3 and 4 which lie West of a Southerly extension of the Westerly line of the Easterly 23.0 feet of Lot 15, Block "A", (of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida), LESS the East 23.0 feet of said Lot 4 thereof, all in H. A. KILGORE'S SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 58, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Vacated portion of NE Cleveland Street (66.0 feet width) described as follows: That portion lying between Blocks "A" and "B" of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: From the most Easterly corner of Lot 25, of said Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, said corner being on the Northwesterlyright-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street, run thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along said right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run South 84°10'09" East, 99.84 feet to a point on the Southeasterlyright-of--way line of said NE Cleveland Street; thence run South 58°27'00" West, along said Southeasterlyright-of--way line, 33.81 feet; thence continue, along said Southeasterly right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 310.43 feet to a point, said point being on the Southerly extension of a line lying 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown adjacent to Block "B" of said BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION; thence run North 00°12'00" West, along a line 10.0 feet East of a parallel to the Southerly extension of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown on said Block "B", 84.68 feet to the Northwesterlyright- of-way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence run North 51°00'30" East, along said right- of-way line, 220.09 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 15-29-15-03060-002-0090: property containing 16,670 sf, or 0.38 acres MOL Lots 9 thru 25 inclusive and that part of Lot 50, described as follows: Begin at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 50 for the Point of Beginning; thence run North, along the West line of said Lot 50, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9; thence East along the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 9 to the Northerly line of said Lot 24; s ~- thence Southwesterly, along the Northerly line of said Lot 24, to the Point of Beginning, all in Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS the following described tract: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Lot 11 for the Point of Beginning; thence run South 42°19'40" East, 14.91 feet; thence South 84°10'09" East, 248.03 feet to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 25, said corner being on the Northwesterlyright-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along said right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet; thence North 84°10'09" West, 152.60 feet; thence South 47°48'56" West, 26.76 feet to a point 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue; thence South 00°12'00" East, along a line of 10.0 feet East of the parallel to the East line of Greenwood Avenue, 136.01 feet to the Northwesterlyright-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 51°00'30" West, along the Northwesterlyright-of--way of NE Cleveland Street, 12.83 feet to the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue, 235.10 feet to the Point of Beginning. (For right-of--way purposes for realignment of NE Cleveland Street and for widening of Greenwood Avenue.) zT r _ ~i g}'~' ./J .~~lne 7. Zt~{~~ ~'la~n~~i.za~ .Depaz°t7n~nt l t~(~ South ~tyl-tle A~-entle ~Ieal-water, 1JL 3~7 ~:.E_ ~'C ..;!~2Ot)6-~~~2~ - 1 ~ 00 ~C3evelan~l Stx•eet .1u:iae l , ~Q~~~i i=~RC I'~at~nng comment#~ ~ea~- Sir / ~~ a~a~~ ~~eu-v~~ate~- C~'~z-~tx•~, ~.:LC, the av~~~~z-Jc~evelo~acr o~'th:E project, h~~-Eb~~ ~ez-t~_~ies that fine seconc~ar~~ cl~~~elli.a~g unit doors clenl~ed as follows: unit ~ (slacct A ~ .04;}z L1z~ 6 (sheet x.2.01); LTz~~~ts 2, ~ ~.nd 4 (sheet a~2.(~2); a~~d ~lnits ?, 3 and` ~s]~eet X2.03) are fox- tl~.~ oae purposes o~ seconclaz~~~ in:~zess az~d egress to :the residences the}r are attacJ~ed as sho~~n in. its s~hn~i;t~cd clevelo~~ment plans_ ~'h;e ow~~.er/i:teve~op~r ~~rtk~e;r certifies that it v~ill in n~ manna-; utilize these seco~~da~-y ~doo~-s for. the p~~rposes ol'splttin~ residcnc~s iiatc~ ~n~tlt:ipl~ residences. S i_ncc~•el~l, ~`'° ~I~iGIN~lL aFCEIVFD ~~t~~ M _ l3on.neville ~ ~''i 0 9 2p06 ~~~~!Ile~-/T~~ve~op~r ~727~ ~~~_~~~,,~`~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER ~.' ~ • / STORMWATER NARRATIVE The portion of the project located along Cleveland Street between MLK, Jr. Avenue and N.W. Cleveland Street includes the main building and associated sidewalk improvements. The stormwater runoff from this parcel will be discharged into the existing underground conveyance system within Cleveland Street and conveyed to the City of Clearwater Town Pond. The portion of the site north of N.E. Cleveland Street will keep the current sheet flow runoff pattern in-tact. The existing pavement will remain in place with the exception of pavement removal for the creation of landscape buffers and planter areas. ORIGINAL RECENED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 end 4-801.C) 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ^ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _ ?~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND .NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCUL~4TIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capadty. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ~' Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/waterstucty requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): __~ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representafives~to visit and photograph' the property described in this application. Signatiyre of property owner or representative I L UNoj 5 ~ ! ~[- STATE OF F6ARfBA, COUNTY OF PflQEL-Qty Sworn to and subscribed before me this 3 F ° day of w /Yl r A.D. 20 Q (T to me and/or by ~j? k~ h~! . a yr .r t ~. ~ ,who is personally known has produced .rc r.. ;l,/l~.7 a1Gks C iar~.rS~ "OFFICIAL SEAL" Martin M. Bryant My commission expires: / ~ ~ ~ ~~ommission Expires Sept. 27, C:\DOCUME-1\KATRIN-1.BRE\LOCALS-t\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc ORIGINAL Page 7 of 8 RECEIVED ti~A~ 0 5 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARV/ATER N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Provide names of a l l y ~ ~ ~~ 1"lam O1/~1~1eUd ~ ~~ec~~~~il'~, ~®ti'~~{'r ~~ S ~•. V~ 'Y~_ ~"Y~11~Q iJ t I~~ ~ i 1 2~`i ~ ~ Y~~ / k ~ ~ 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ,~ 4 C3 ~i° v e /~ h c/~f ~~, ~'/Pty r' ~c14 ~ ~ . ~C b~J3 ~ S' S' 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) S°~e ~~-~~(~,.,~ ~~ 1,~~~- D r-ey~~g~.~ 4. That the.ugndersigned (haslhave) appointed and (doesldo) appoint: . 2 C.. K P [~-~, ~, ~ 4' k~ Q o P fin, , as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to wnsider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That ), the undersigned authority, hereby certjf y th the foregoing is true and correct. / f X ~ CAM Q% ~z' - ~Z, .. \ ,., ro Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner 3-TATE OF Ft9R~B~t; ~. ~L ~ tilpt~ COUNTY OF WNEL~4S ~-~) j L t= ~~ Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~ day of b y / ' ' ~~ o~~ personally appeared ~+'-t '~ ~G ~ ItQV) who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. _~ "OFFICIAL SEAL" Martin M. Bryant Notary u lic Signature Notary Public, State of Illinois o Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires Sept, 27, 2008 My Commission Expires: 4 • ~ 7- 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~49A'~ 0 5 206 C:\DOCUME-1\tCATRIN~I.BRE\LOCALS-1\Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page s of s PfANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEF,RV/ATER N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: GiUS~ //I. $ONNEcJ~w~ _~tZ~~~ t~,NT~ONY S . ~~NL~ 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and nerd title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): fl~~ Cc Ey~~ ~ . C~E~wA--~-. FL ~~~~~ 3. y constitutes the property for w hich a request fora: (describe request) That this prope rt / ~ / ~ 4. nd (does/do) appoint: That the unders ned (has/have) appointed a ig /~ i / as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affrdavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to cor-sider and act on the above described property; ti. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visft and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned ority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and coryect - A '~ // ~ /~ ~/ T "~` _ ~ _ Property Owner Property Owner V / -~z~ Pro a Owner Pn' Owner - pe-hr P rty STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS (~~ Florida, on this ~y~ ~ / ~ day of laws of the State of Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned b the j ,^~ ~ ~~ ~~ personally appeared ~~t~7G3n) ~~t~., /~~ who having been first duly sworn es nd sa s that he/she fully understands the contents of the avit tha she geed. <~`Y "r~'' ROSA E. MELENDEZ *; .- MY COMMISSION # DD 152173 ' _••., ~ a EXPIRES: October 27, 2006 '~i,p,'f~t°Q'~ BondedThruNotaryPublicUndenvriters c S~' nature ~ / / ~ Notary SeaVStamp tuty Commission Expires: (f (/~ ~' ~~ a' ®U .~ ORiGINAI RECEIVED C:\DOCUME~IUCATRIN-1.BREILOCALS-1\Temp\ComprehensNe Infili Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc ~A~ ~ 5 206 Page 8 Of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIT>' OF CLEARV/ATER _° ~learvvater Planning D~nt 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans '~ NOTE: a total of 15 sets of this application and all supporting documentation is required to be submitted in conjunction with a complete Level Two Flexible Development Application. CASE l~ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 02/14/05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Clearwater Center LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1100 Cleveland Street Ste. 900 Clearwater FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-447-2398 FAX NUMBER: 727-442-0492 CELL NUMBER: 727-234-7853 EMAIL: ambonneCa~comcast net PROPERTY OWNER(S): Gu 8 Susan Bonneville Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner Anthon Dorner (Must include ALL owners as fisted on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Za ac P.E. RLA MA-LING ADDRESS: 701 Enterarise Road Ste 404 Safetv Harbor FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: _ keithCa keithzavac com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) RECEIVED STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 1100 Cleveland Street JUN 0 9 2006 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A ING DEPARTMENT (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) CITY Of CLEARWATER PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A PARCEL SIZE: 2.48 AC 108 080.94 SF (acres, square feet) HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 16 HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? _ 21.498 IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? x YES NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: 155 ft plus 21'-6" high hat • PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): ~ P See Attachment Cr= ~ C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of~my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature f property owner or r p e e~ntative / STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn~• to and subscribed before me this c~~~ay of -,-~ A.D.~ 20~ to me and/or by ~ <+' • t/.~ / ,•Fwho is personally known has identificatig . // ._.. Not • pu My commission expires: ROSA £. fviEG£t+ID£Z EXPIRES: Gcfober 27, 2C06 ©onded Thru Notary Public Underwriters ORIGINAL RECENED ~~N 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 2 CITY Of CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2006 Attachment A Legal Description(s) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER Parce115-29-15-03060-001-0010: property containing 91,411 sf, or 2.10 acres MOL and 15-story building commonly known as Clearwater Centre, 1100 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 Lots 1 thru 14 inclusive, Lot 15, less the East 23.0 feet thereof, all in Block "A", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. LESS the West 10.0 feet of said Lot 1, deeded to the City of Clearwater for right-of--way purposes. Lots 1, 2, 10 and that part of Lots 3 and 4 which lie West of a Southerly extension of the Westerly line of the Easterly 23.0 feet of Lot 15, Block "A", (of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida), LESS the East 23.0 feet of said Lot 4 thereof, all in H. A. KILGORE'S SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 58, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Vacated portion of NE Cleveland Street (66.0 feet width) described as follows: That portion lying between Blocks "A" and "B" of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: From the most Easterly corner of Lot 25, of said Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, said corner being on the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street, run thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along said right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run South 84°10'09" East, 99.84 feet to a point on the Southeasterly right-of--way line of said NE Cleveland Street; thence run South 58°27'00" West, along said Southeasterly right-of--way line, 33.81 feet; thence continue, along said Southeasterly right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 310.43 feet to a point, said point being on the Southerly extension of a line lying 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown adjacent to Block "B" ofsaid-BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION; thence run North 00°12'00" West, along a line I0.0 feet East of a parallel to the Southerly extension of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown on said Block "B", 84.68 feet to the Northwesterlyright- of-way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence nun North 51°00'30" East, along said right- of-way line, 220.09 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 15-29-15-03060-002-0090: property containing 16,670 sf, or 0.38 acres MOL Lots 9 thru 25 inclusive and that part of Lot 50, described as follows: Begin at the most. Southerly corner of said Lot 50 for the Point of Beginning; thence run North, along the West line of said Lot 50, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9; thence East along the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 9 to the Northerly line of said Lot 24; thence Southwesterly, along the Northerly line of said Lot 24, to the Point of Beginning, all in Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS the following described tract: Begin at N ~! the Northwest corner of said Lot 11 for the Point of Beginning; thence run South 42°19'40" East, 14.91 feet; thence South 84°10'09" East, 248.03 feet to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 25, said corner being on the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along said right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet; thence North 84°10'09" West, 152.60 feet; thence South 47°48'56" West, 26.76 feet to a point 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue; thence South 00°12'00" East, along a line of 10.0 feet East of the parallel to the East line of Greenwood Avenue, 136.01 feet to the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 51°00'30" West, along the. Norkhwesterly right-of--way of NE Cleveland Street, 12.83 feet to the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue, 235.10 feet to the Point of Beginning. (For right-of--way purposes for realignment of NE Cleveland Street and for widening of Greenwood Avenue.) ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 g 2006 P CIN OF CLEARWA ERT N N CLEARWATER CENTRE ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED 1. The project adds eighty-eight (88) new, downtown residential units in the Town Lake Residential District. 2. The project adds twenty-one thousand, four-hundred, ninety-eight (21,498) square feet of new, non-residential floor area that will be used to provide ground floor retail as well as office floor azea along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue, serving to increase the viability and vibrancy of the project. 3. The project provides a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan, including landscaping, lighting, signage, pavers and fountains; all consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 4. The project provides adequate off street pazking to support the entirety of the proposed residential, retail, and office components. Two-hundred thirteen (213) spaces aze provided with a maximum of two-hundred twelve (212) spaces required and eighty-one (81) of the total parking spaces are provided specifically for the non-residential components for access by the commercial tenants and their public visitors. 5. Avery stazk, lifeless, vacant and out of date facility is being renovated and enhanced to add character and life to the district. 6. The balconies, glass elements, step-backs, and roof cap will change the visual dimension of the structure to make it more slender and have transparency and light. 7. A self contained pazking program with clear entries, residential and commercial parking aze being provided within a concealed parking garage. 8. Adding residents and retail/office downtown enhances life and chazacter downtown. 9. Reduction of traffic impacts and closure of two existing ingress/egress curb-cuts along Cleveland Street and one existing curb-cut along Greenwood Avenue. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision of 88 residential units in the Town Lake Residential District and a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan and including landscaping, lighting, pavers and fountains. These amenties are consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. ORIGINAL RECENED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): See Attachment C ~ .~ C. SIGPIATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature f property owner or representative of A.D. _ 20~, to me and/or by N / ,who is personally known has produ d l~C~ as ideMficati _~ Not pu My commission expires: ROSA E. MELENDEZ env nnnen~icainni ~ nn EXPIRES: October 27, 2006 Bonded Thru Notary Public UndenvrBers ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this o~_~ay Page 2 of 2 06/13/2006 TUE 10:43 FA% 941 351 9655 STEWART ENGINEERING r~ooz/oo~ i _ 86/3/'?6?~ std: <~6 •. 7277L35277 • ZAYAC PAGE 03 a Claanrator F'11e ~ Imscue e ~ 610 Franidln 8treot- Cieenratar~ Florlda 3~ti8 Publla 1Mortta Admlrthttralioo ~En~noadng tToparbnsgt ~ 100 S. tnlyAlm lllovv•nw, SYllo Z00- t~arrrrel®r, Florida 3~OB (ROVisad Q3/29~2006) This w~orkehset is required b be aibmitled b and appmred by the Authority Having Jufsdicfon (ANJ) prior b DRG meeting for any prvjed that is more tisan 3 stories or more than 30 feet in t-eight above tttie lowest Fire Dept vehicle aoae~ paint or for any over projract 4tat WIA rAc~6re an ALbrrtaia V1lat Stendplpe System aroi/or Rre Pwnp bebre any pemtltafar near buNt~ng canetrucMan, buNdktg s~andon or file hydrardswill be iasied by the City of Clearwater. ir,tvma~an and dsdgn must comply Wtlf Florida Bralring Code Chapter 9 -Fire Pro~cfan Systems, Florida Flte Prevention Cade M indude appGwbls NIFpA Code (NFPA 1 ~ 13. 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15~ 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) end AVYIAfA M-17 - heta~aion, Fgrtd Teethe and Malr~erfanara of Fire Hydnante Project Nwn~ ~q 4J a %~i2 CErJ 7e~. _ _ Project Addrea~C_~ j.~,. .4. c;~(.~ L.~~ r~ S T G Ce'.a~ t,. a rr; !t .-c, s 3 ~ SS toe~tlotr of t+laaroel; Flro Flydront ~. ~ . Co2n1.~.R, c:~d'y<' t~J~-L ¢ At L k Hydrant f3: / y Sias oflMatarMmin Srpplying Rre Row. ~ ~~ Looped 3y~em orDOddEnd t~t®tMrsn?T (.0Q StaSa~ 3 pd Reslduel~ S y Pei Pibf: ~ ~ psi Flow: i! ~j o 6t~ _,~ Otemnee ofTeet Gar~ee Relative b the Base d the lieec Horimrrtai ~,~ Ft. Vertiod Beva6an~_Ft, HydrantTvdConductpod0y: G fy ~ C[_~.aRta,4rx2 ,,,J,n,'~r,2 ~~,~-~,~ ~ ~1GCGrV _ trnaw.ihe.or+ caar a ~xur Tea sn.aq Area d dA~~caO'on i~saiper>rt o/ MeteN Pratedae f~cvrmiody0. SYvreeHegK ordhrarlpoprolR KpAaltae0rol~ ..S c ~r 3~.Jn Pic NaS~ ~,~a~7,~„~ ~srJ ~F vim ~3Lei,.~..~i~ __--- A~ohAdaldvrd Sbaa/lNe~eaay Plate t of 3 ~u~t--c.rPiwr~ C:~ 06/19/2006 TUE 10:44 FAI( 941 351 9655 STE49ART ENGINEERING X1003/007 ~,~6/13/,2dd6 ~1R_06-_ r 12772+9 ZAVAC • PAGE R4 ~- •s 1 P ~~ - ~ - ~~. - Area p SyMsm Type A-es (sq.1r.) DensrTy (gpmK) hside Hose ~prr1} Outsiab Muse (BPS ~~ ~ '- p-- .- .- ~ r ~ ~•~. AfrehAdibnr 3ry~MNsc+~sa~ Td~ Needed Fire Raw (N.F.F.) 2~ ys/ ~ /~ ~iR ry Is Exietin~ System Supply Sutiae~t b Mest N.F.F. Above? No ~/ Yes SystemConponsnt App~fiaabla NFPASIenctard/Yesr6dr7bnard O<frsrApplicade Codes orStafites ~fr"~ PV P „~_~~ a~ 3 ,wr~n~a~ro,r sn..aaNR.+~s.r If wgeat Indudesfire Pump. SUpplyttte Fallowing: Fire Pump trtfomaTion: Pump C~ec~ty:.... /Qe.~ 9pm Chum Pre~ure: 23 q _ _ps Rated Preasne: / $0 p® Praseu~e ~ 15096 Row- 2 7 ps On-Sits Storapa Tdhk Cepe~cibl rtfi Iy Z . PalpBre~ Name: /ZDf~T L. ~~~ ~ C. - Compam- t~rne: , S7Eu/~/t~i wl iLJec~Ln~ 6 - MepingAddre~ ~j T= Lv smis: ~- ~ ---- Zp: 35I z3 `~ _ _.~ Phase: q /- 35(- _ X4910 1=ax: yy~.~r .~~1- 96 S-5 - Pace 4 d 3 06/1/2006 TiJE 10:44 FA% 941 X51 9655 STEW.tRT ENGINEERING 06/~3/~:k10Yi X0:06 ~Z-7239277 • • Fins Prevention ttornato bs Addhsaead Pr~ar b DRC Approval: 01004/007 PAGE OS 1. Provide Fire Fbw Cetadatiors 1 Water t3tudlr by a FIRE PROTEDTION E3rGiNEER to assure an adequate water soppy h availabb and to determine I at5r upprsdea ere tequitect by the de-eloPgr dire to the impact d this project. the water supply must De et>te to support theppraysds d arAr I~equir~ed tiro sprinkler, dandplpe andJortire pcmp. if a fire poop ie required, the walgr Na F~ N PAs14~, ttFPA 2t~ NFPAZ9i, at NFPA (Annec Mlequh~ ZD04 Florida FN+e Pl+evtrNioe Coda to irrclud+ 2 WhOn eh FQC $ required, t sttalN be a mininum d 16 feetfrom taulkNnD and shell have a foe hydrant within40 feet Thls hydrant shall not be IocaRed orr the srlrrte main as the F{re SpllMcler and must be on the soppy side d e double detector check vsMe. 7-ris hrdrart is in siddtion to the lydrArrt tlwR Mr requir+a~d tarfi~gfrting purpaees that is to be within 300 taut d buAdkrp. ®ttte hoes (^y^, end on the ^dne aide d the afros! ss the project. 3. Provide end 8howon the plan a rtimimum 30~todt tutNn9 rsdlus tot emerger>a- vehGe in8reas and egress et ail entraroes end excite. 4. Pfon-kts afid ehoW ort the ate plan 24 fed d width 8R dr4rev~q~j/a /drive aisles for emerpenq vehhle bprees end egress ferfnent and tear perkitrg lots Where drivewdj-s ate spNt ty an island with orie-NCI tcdfiq aooh side d the tclend aheA pror Ida End ahoew Orr the site plan 20ted d Yddth at the drM awq/s on ouchside d the isand 5. Prov Ida a F(re DepeAmsnt amass toadMN (with tun-.er+ound,Y. T or arFdeaec) !n accc+rdartcs with NFPA 1. A Fke DePaetRtant access roadnetl murlt bade ?Next clepr width and l440Ct vertieai clBeraree, and be capable d suppoRinp the weipM d Fire DepaRmeRYeMdes (8gt1t)Oiba) ZAYAC Pape3 d 9 06/13/2006 TUE 10:44 FAg 941 351 9655 STEVYART ENGINEERING 06/i3/,2~0~ ~QI:06 7c^"l7277277~ ZAYAC ~~-~:••~io•• ~*~:_~c:~r_w~• _:~~~]tw:~ _14•ITFfi 'r2l•'•35~•1~= i_::~r:r-. tll/23~:'006 BB'19 737 i°F7 PUBL:= LT:± IlIF ~~ow T~sT CflY OF C{.F1111MA'~1'iR NAYNI Dr-ART~1rT I~I005/007 PAGE 82 • .~ P~ e. ~- _ c~Z.. 0 ~p z.. 06/19/2006 TUE 10:49 FA$ 941 951 9655 STE99ART ENGINEERING ~1~~~~~1 ///// E60007t07 7859 Nortfigate Btvd 5~ite #1 Phone (941) 3~1~9996 Sarasota, Florida 34734 FAX (941) 357-9655 i~ mail Address stewdrtengirleering~usau~et c'c . ~~~ric~~ X001/007 • FAX `['~tANSMITTAL !OB#: ~ i3-~ IA Q~((3S/ 9996 FAx No: 72?- ~'~Z• y5~~i WE ARE FAX[Nd YOU PAGES. INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE URGENT ^ FOR YOUR REVIEW ^ t:UNFIDENTIAL 1 -~ ,~ ~- ~ ~. ~ ~-- i o ^ TRASH so ~a EO 50 40 30 c0 '.0 0 I ~o 63 STaT-C 59 RESr0 qE ® ~ X90 GPM ~ 58 PSI AT 1500 PUA1P A7 150 G'M 50 AT HYpRANT ~9 50 ' i S9 PSt AT 1140 GPM 40 27 PRESSURE IN P-PING AT AT 1500 GPM THERE 15 SUCTION SIDE Of PUMP AT A PRESSURE LOSS OF ~ 150 PU1AP CRP AGITY 30 r 30 a51 PROM THE HYpRANT TO THE ~ {1500 GPhI} { SUCTION 510E OF THE " - 0 PUNP LEAVING L7 PSI < EXCESS PRESSURE 10 C I °OO °o °o °o o° °o o° n. a m m o N a 0 0 °o 0 N P R f S S U R E P S I FCC~YI GPM 06/1/2006 TTJE 10:44 FAg 941 S51 9655 STEFi'ART ENGINEERING 01006/007 ' `} atewacT tngg (:oti,ultattts 1 R59 Nortlrgate Blvd Sarxst~la, x134234 Fire Standpik~c Hydraulic Reference Paint Water p2ma~td Calculation Standpipe CiPM demand based nn specific project codes. Pressure Calculations Jab No. Ry: TMn Job N.unc: Clearwater Ccnlc:r Shcct No. 1 of 1 Y~urmul ~ Pe = H x 0.433 ur Pc = H /2.~ 1 T•T - height ro highest sp,inkler head Pe = rcquirrd pracsurc for elevation rormula l'f = :~ P.r• = prcrsurc Insc in system distribuliou piping input is an esrimared lass. (approx, 20 to 25 ps1 conl;~nn with Cameron Hydraulic Data Handbook reference or equal means. ros - pressurz required ar rop of gtnndpipe Pressure [oral tbrznula Pe ~i• 1'f j• tos = Prot 185 psi Standpipe Hydraulic Rcticrcncc Paint IUUU tiYM (~!; 185 YSl Number of hose connections: 2 Minimum presiurc of hcrsc connccticm {psi): I QI Minimum flow of staadpipz systzm (Fprn): 1 UUU [stimatcd rcqui,rd pressu,•.:: Pressun: loss linen Height (psi): h5 Backfluw loss (psi): ~ Pressurz loss in system nilaing (pci): 20 Pressure Required at Hose Connection (psi): 100 Salcly marKin: 10°/n Rzquired min, Pres. (psi): 212 Date: Cltkd By: IUUU gpm I50 feet 65 psi 20 psi 100 p,i .~ • ~.. °~ ~e~'arwate~ U v v v v v Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida. 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4747 Fax: 727-562-4755 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 3 COPIES OF THE ORGINIAL APPLICATION INCLUDING STTE PLANS CLEARVVA'I'ER D®~%'VNTO~N ST®RIVIWAT'ER SERVICE DISTRIC'T' API~I~ICATION 1"YYIr UK YKLN'T~ A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: Clearwater Centre LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1100 Cleveland Street. Clearwater. FL 33755 E-MAIL ADDRESS: ambonne(~icomcast.net PHONE NUMBER: 727-447-2398 CELL NUMBER: 727-234-7853 FAX NUMBER: 727-442-0492 PROPERTY OWNER (S): Guy & Susan Bonneville. Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, Anthony Doer (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME (S): Keith E. Zavac. P.E., RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road East. Ste. 404. Safety Harbor. FL 34695 E-MAIL ADDRESS: _keith~a,keithzayac.com PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 CELL NUMBER: AX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 Form 1365-0401 Rev. 8/03 - -t - -_ __..-.._ .~ ~ • • B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of the subject site: 1100 Clevelaad Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A PROPOSED USE and SIZE (type of business, number of dwelling units, acreage of building) _88 Condominiums and 21,498 SF of Commercial Space IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING PROPOSED square feet square feet BUILDING/SIDEWALK 10,342.00 sf _74,504.38 sf VECHICLE USE AREA 71,683.08 sf 0.00 sf POND AREA 0 sf 0.00 sf IMI'ERVIOUS TOTAL _82,025.08 sf _74,504.38 sf PERVIOUS AREA 9,385.89 sf _16,906.59 sf TOTAL SITE AREA acreage _91,410.97 sf FOR CITY OF' CLEARWATER USE ONLY $::18,595=.00/pei~`acre up to. T:5 acres (e.g 13.2U sq."ft:;= 0:0303 acres; 18;595.00 x 0.03= $563:8) ,_ - _ $18,595.00 s- acres -$ _ - ,. -OR _ - -, .. $75,000;0O.forprojects larger than 1.5 acres PLUS25,000/per acre (e:g total project s~ze.3':5 acres; $75;000.00 + (3.5 acres Y $ 25,000.00)= $ 1°62;SOO..OU) _ $ 75,000 + (acres x $ 25,000 00)-==$ .._ - 'TOTAL... $: Form 1365-0001 Rev. 8/03 2 ADDITIONAL POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAMS: (e.g. covered parking, well car program, xeriscape landscaping) The project includes the removal of the surface parking and replacement with garage parking. C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representative to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ~ " . Sign a of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~; Sworn to and subscn~bed before me this aZ~ of / llt/ ~ A.D. 20®~ to me and/or by C'~)' ~ ' ~p;J~l MVP f~, ~ ,who is orally known produced as identification. public, My commission e ' es: . ~~Y e~'• ROSA E. MElENDEZ :24•' ~~: *. ,r MY COMIuiISSION # DD 152173 ~~. ~a: EXPIRES: October 27, 2006 '%:F of F.,°,pO` BondedThru Notary Publib Undernriters Form 1365-OQO1 Rev. 8103 ~ N BOEN'S TREE SERVICE P.O. Box 86 Ozona, Fl., 34660-0086 Tree Inventory -1100 Building 3/31 /2005 To: Keith Zayac &Assoc. ~o?, ~~ -~~~s ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER The following report is submitted by Boen's Tree Service, Inc., and includes findings that we believe are accurate based on our education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. Boen's Tree Service has no interest personally or ftnancially in this property and our report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Triangle Development Inc., and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Canopy Analysis The subject property is an existing commercial site that has been previously cleared of all vegetation. The existing trees have been planted to meet landscape requirements or to enhance the property. The dominant tree is the live oak (Quercus virginiana) which comprises approximately 70% of the canopy. The trees at this site are stressed due to improper maintenance and harsh growing conditions. The majority of trees are located in small islands surrounded by asphalt and are not receiving supplemental irrigation. The tree crowns reflect improper pruning and general neglect in the form of large branch stubs and accumulated deadwood. Many of the trees are uplifting pavement or cracking curbs. The trees are showing decline which will continue unless the site conditions are changed. The solution is to remove pavement and increase the rooting area. In addition, hydro- aerate the existing soil and add irrigation. If this is not feasible the site should be re- designed and planted with accent trees and palm species that will adapt to small landscape islands and harsh growing conditions. Specific recommendations for individual trees are included in the tree inventory. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the inventory data: M ~~ Tree# -location -Each tree i~s assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size -Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. S ecies -Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating -The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around. the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). Atree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A .tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. ORIGIN RECEIVEp JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY O~ CLEARWATER M N 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other. problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #S rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. NOTE: This inventory was performed on June 3, 2005. ~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Af CLEARWATER ... v ~~ ~/'lL RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIiY Of CLEARWATER Tree Inventory Tree# Size Species Rating 14" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 2. p Comments: This tree has a large accumulation of deadwood in the crown and dieback at most of the branch tips. The form is average and there are several gaps in the upper crown. There are several stubs in the crown indicating previous improper pruning. The live crown ratio is below average and the foliage appears slightly chlorotic. The trunk forms five scaffold branches 3.5' above grade and two of the branches on the north side are growing against each other and will eventually cause wounds in both stems. This tree is growing in a 4' wide planter located between the sidewalk for Martin Luther King Avenue and the site parking lot. Several cars were parked with their front ends hanging over the buffer and consequently, engine oil and antifreeze have likely dripped into the soil over the years causing harm to the trees. Recommend removal. NOTE: Several of the trees in the landscape buffers adjacent to Martin Luther King Avenue, Cleveland Street and Northeast Cleveland Street have cracked the street sidewalks or buckled the parking lot asphalt. The inventory will reflect the tree's overall condition on arboricultural related aspects of tree health not in the context of a tree causing structural damage. However, the damage will increase exponentially as these trees grow and serious thought should be given to logic of preserving these trees in light of this factor. It is our opinion that the site conditions cannot be altered sufficiently to mitigate the impending damage. 2 19" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree has a spreading crown with high crown density and good overall structure. The tree has three scaffold branches emanating from the trunk 4' above the grade. but all the stems have wide crotches with connective tissue. The tree has several stubs cuts and deadwood that need removal. This tree will be a good tree if pruned properly, The root system of this tree is severely buckling the pavement and has cracked the sidewalk previously as indicated by newly replaced sidewalk sections. This tree is worthy of preservation if the site is modified to accommodate future growth. 3 19" live oak 3.0 Comments: The trunk of this tree has a slight lean to the west and actually grows about three inches into the sidewalk adjacent to Martin Luther King Avenue. This is a hazardous situation for pedestrians and bicyclist and will only worsen as the tree grows. This tree has caused four sidewalk panels to be replaced and has raised the parking lot. This tree forks twice and forms four scaffold branches. They are codominant but have wide crotches with connective tissues. The western fork has a large cavity 7' above grade ~ N where a large branch has been ripped off leaving a gaping wound. The tree is trying to close the wound but has not been successful. This tree has a very high accumulation of deadwood occurring uniformly throughout the tree. The upper crown structure is good but the live crown ratio is slightly below average. Recommend removal unless site conditions are altered to accommodate this tree. 4 16" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has buckled the pavement anal has cracked the sidewalk. The structure is good and live crown ratio is below average. This tree has deadwood and stubs present and is growing low over the parking lot and needs to be pruned. This tree could be preserved if the site conditions are altered. 27" live oak. 4.0 Comments: This tree is located near Cleveland Street in a small triangular island interior to the parking lot. The tree has a good root flare and trunk. The trunk flare is very close to the curb that surrounds the island and the lateral roots have uplifted the pavement. The live crown ratio is very high and crown density is also very good. The upper crown structure is good and the form and appearance are good. The tree has an accumulation of deadwood and stubs and needs to be pruned. This is a tree that should be preserved as it is perhaps the best tree on site. The tree needs a larger island and expanded rooting area. Recommend preservation. 6 25" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree is located 3' from the sidewalk at Cleveland Street and is growing in a triangular island and has cracked the surrounding pavement. The tree has a girdling root on the west side that is growing over two root flares. The root can be removed from the southern most flare but is embedded in the easternmost flare and cannot be removed. This root could kill the impacted root in the future. This tree has good lower and upper crown structure. It has good appearance and the crown spreads over Cleveland Street. It has deadwood and stubs and needs to be pruned. The live crown ratio is above average. Recommend preservation. 7 10' C.T. Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis) 4.0 Comments: This palm is healthy and has an attractive crown. Recommend preservation or transplanting on site. 8 13' C.T. Canary Island date palm 4.5 Comments: This palm has a very attractive crown and should be preserved in place or transplanted on site. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 14" live oak 2 p Comments: This tree is growing in a 3' wide planter interior to the parking lot and close to Cleveland Street. The tree has a girdling root that is covering the entire north side of the trunk. The east side also has a bad girdling root. The crown is one-sided to the south. The structure is below average. The tree has a codominant stem with included bark 5.5' above grade. The live crown ratio is below average and the form is poor. Recommend removal. 10 18" live oak 2 0 Comments: This tree is growing in the same island as tree #9 and is located to the north. It has a large root that has grown over the curb. The tree has poor structure with a codominant trunk with included bark 5' above grade. The tree has poor form and the crown is one-sided to the east. The tree has considerable branch dieback throughout the crown and the live crown ratio is below average. Recommend removal. 11 11" live oak 2 0 Comments: This tree has a wound on the west side starting 6" above grade and extending up the trunk for 2.5'. The wound has sealed over but has caused interior decay that will compromise the structure of the trunk. The tree has dieback in 30% of the crown and deadwood throughout. This tree is in a narrow interior planter and has uplifted the pavement. The structure is below average and the form is poor. Recommend removal. 12 7" live oak 2 p Comments: This tree is in the same planter as tree # 11 and has very poor form and below average live crown ratio. It also has deadwood and crown dieback. Recommend removal. 13 10' C.T. cabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 4.0 Comments: This palm is part of a five palm cluster growing in an interior landscape island east of the building. It is healthy and attractive. Recommend preservation or transplanting on site. 14 14 C. T, sabal palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is healthy and attractive and should be preserved on site. 15 13' C.T. sabal palm Comments: This is the center palm of the grouping and has a slightly restricted crown but is very healthy and should be preserved on site. 4.0 16 11' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 ORIGINAL RECENED ~u~v o 9 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ N Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction at the bud and is down graded accordingly. This palm could be preserved but should not be over pruned as this will cause further restriction. 17 14' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is very healthy and attractive and should be preserved on site. 18 8" live oak 1.0 Comments: This tree along with trees #19 & 20 are growing in a 30" wide island interior to the parking lot. This tree had a codominant trunk but the west side is completely sheared off. The tree has very poor structure and form and needs to be removed. 19 8" Live oak 1.5 Comments: This tree has 30% deadwood in the crown and has very poor form. The ORIGINAL crown is anemic with very low live crown ratio. Recommend removal. RECEIVED 20 11" live oak 2.0 F ~ ~'~ 0 9 2006 Comments: This tree has a codominant trunk that is about to become included 5' above ~,~~ps~~~~, ~?~Bt~tN! grade. The crown is small in proportion to the trunk diameter and has no upper center ,~ ' ~','~`~~~~ crown. The appearance is below average and the live crown ratio is low. It has deadwood and dieback present. Recommend removal. 21 18" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is located in a triangular shaped interior island. It has good overall structure. The trunk forks into four scaffold branches that have connective tissues within the crotch. The tree has grown around a piece of garden hose used to stake it at one time and the hose is embedded in the trunk. The live crown ratio is slightly below average and the appearance is slightly above average. It is a borderline 3.0 but will improve with pruning. Recommend preservation. 22 16" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree has a good trunk and structure. The crown spreads and has a good appearance. The crown has an accumulation of deadwood and needs pruning. The live crown ratio and crown density are very good. Recommend preservation. 23 24' live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is growing on a raised island in the interior of the parking lot. The trunk has minor basal decay possibly caused by the presence of a girdling root. The tree ~ ~N has a large stub 9" in diameter that is decaying and several smaller stubs in the crown. It also has considerable deadwood. The live crown ratio and overall from is average. The tree could be preserved but is in need of pruning. 24 14" live oak 1.5 Comments: This tree is located at the corner of Martin Luther King Avenue and Northeast Cleveland Street. It is completely covered by a strangler fig (Ficus aurea). The ficus is wrapped around the base and the first 8' of the trunk. Strangler figs eventually cover the entire host plant causing it to die from sunlight deprivation. It is essentially impossible to remove the ficus without doing serious damage to the oak. The oak is in poor overall condition anyway and should be removed. 25 9" live oak 1.0 Comments: This tree is located in the same island as tree #24 and is in poor condition. The tree has a 6" long wound on the northwest side of the trunk 1' above grade that will result in decay and compromise the structural integrity of the trunk. The tree is growing beneath power wires and the upper crown will need to be pruned in the future. The tree has low live crown ratio and deadwood and stubs. Recommend removal. 26 12' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 2.5 Comments: This palm is growing in a 4' wide buffer between the site parking lot and the sidewalk for Northeast Cleveland Street. The palm is growing against the concrete curb of the parking lot. This palm came up from wild seed and is in good health. However, it is growing beneath a rack of wires that run above the right of way and is in a poor location. Recommend removal. 27 17" live oak 2 0 Comments: This tree has girdling roots due to the presence of the concrete curb that acts as a 1' high retaining wall. The lower crown structure is poor as the trunk forks into four scaffold branches that will soon be included. The crown has dieback present and has below average live crown ratio. The form is also poor as the tree has very little center crown due to the wires. Recommend removal. 28 11' live oak 2 0 Comments: This tree has a codominant trunk with a wide crotch. The canopy grows directly into the wires. The crown is thinning and dying back in some areas. The tree has an accumulation of deadwood and poor overall form. Recommend removal. 29 9" live oak 2 5 ORIGINAL RECENED JUN. 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 1 ~ ~ ~Ff`~nirr Comments: This tree has good lower structure but poor upper crown structure due to previous improper pruning. The live crown ratio and foliage density is good. The tree has numerous stubs and below average form. As with all the trees in this buffer, the crown has nowhere to grow. Recommend removal 30 15" live oak 2 0 Comments: This tree has a root system that is mostly on the surface due to the retaining wall and does not appear to be anchored firmly. The tree forks into three scaffold branches 4.5' above grade. There•used to be a fourth branch but it has been ripped off the tree and is now a decaying stub. This tree has poor form and below average live crown ratio. In addition, it has a large amount of dieback and deadwood. Recommend removal. 31 18" live oak 3.0 . Comments: This tree has average live crown ratio and crown density. It is dying back at the top of three branches probably due to the asphalt covering the root system. The form and overall structure is good. The tree needs to be pruned as it has deadwood and stubs. Recommend preservation if remedial maintenance will be performed. 32 18" live oak 2 5 Comments: This tree is located near the east property line in a triangular island. The live crown ratio and overall structure are below average but the form is good. This tree will be a good tree if remedial maintenance is performed and site conditions are improved. 33 17" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has a good root flare and trunk although the island has been underlain with visqueyne. The upper crown has good structure. The live crown ratio is below average. The primary downgrading factor of this tree is the amount of deadwood and the thinning crown. Recommend preservation and maintenance. 34 33" live oak 4.0 Comments: This is the largest tree on site. It is located a few feet from the east property line and the crown spreads over the roof of the adjacent property. The root crown is healthy but there is a girdling root on the southeast side that impacts a lateral root. The trunk forms eight scaffold branches 7' above grade. The branches range in diameter from 8" to 18". A few of the branches are almost codominant but they have connective tissues in the crotch. The crown is wide spreading with good upper crown structure. The form and appearance are very good. The live crown ratio is good however there is dieback and large deadwood presence. This tree needs maintenance to remove the deadwood, stubs and broken branches. This tree is a good tree and should be preserved. However, cabling and bracing are recommended for the scaffold branches as they will become included. In • C: addition, the tree needs to have an increased rooting area free of pavement and have the soil hydro-aerated. This tree will evolve into a very good tree if maintained. NOTE: Trees # 35 - 45 are Podocarpus trees growing in a planter adjacent to the west and south side of the building. The trees have been pruned to establish a formal "squared" effect. The trees were not surveyed but are protected trees per the City of Clearwater code and have been added to the site plan accordingly. These trees provide an aesthetic benefit and are worthy of preservation except for tree #42. 35 6" Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 3.0 36 5" Podocarpus 3.0 37 6" Podocarpus 3.0 3 8 5" Podocarpus 3.0 ORIGINAL 39 7" RECEIVED Podocarpus 3.0 JUN 0 9 2006 40 6" Podocarpus 3.0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 41 6" Podocarpus 3.0 CITY OF CLEARWATER 42 6" Podocarpus 1.5 Comments: This tree has a 5" wide wound that starts 6" above grade and extends 6' up the trunk. The wound is decayed and the decay is progressive. Recommend removal. 43 7" Podocarpus 3.0 44 5" Podocarpus 3.0 45 8" Podocarpus 3.0 NOTE: Trees #46 - 60 are growing in the parking lot north of Northeast Cleveland Street and were not surveyed. They have been field located on the site plan. 46 Multi-stem strangler fig (Ficus aurea) 1.0 Comments: This tree has 12 trunks which is common for the ficus family as they spread by aerial roots that reach the ground and root and form rigid trunks. This tree is a native ficus that is unique but will simply outgrow this area. It is virtually impossible to maintain a ficus and they are notoriously troublesome to maintain. They produce massive surface roots that are very destructive. Due to its location next to the street it is not practical to preserve this tree. Recommend removal. r 47 8" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) VRIGINAL. RECEIVED ~ JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3.0 CITY Of CLEARWATER Comments: This tree is growing in the northwest corner of the parking lot and adjacent to Martin Luther King Avenue. It has a straight trunk with very good structure. The crown is restricted due to the presence of the nearby strangler fig. If the strangler fig is removed this tree could evolve into a good tree provided there is adequate rooting area. Recommend preservation if tree #46 is removed. 48 12" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree is growing in a landscape island at the corner of Northeast Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King Avenue. The tree has good form and live crown ratio. It has very little dieback and is a good small tree. Recommended preservation. 49 10' C.T. Washington palm 3.5 Comments: This palm is growing in a 3' wide buffer along NB Cleveland Street. The palm is healthy and attractive. Recommend preservation. 50 12" C.T. Washington palm 3.5 Comments: This palm is located in the same buffer as palm #49 and is worthy of preservation. 51 4" laurel oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has a chlorotic and anemic crown and has no room to grow. Recommend removal. 52 23" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is located on the east property line of the parking lot. At one time the adjacent property owner (Thompson Auto) had a chain link fence along the property line. The tree has consumed the chain link fence. It is visible on both sides of the trunk and is growing through a large scaffold branch. It is difficult to determine if this situation will have an adverse effect on the structural or systemic system of the tree. The tree has a codominant trunk 2.5' above grade with a 2" long inclusion. This is the type of codominant situation that can fail and this tree should be cabled and braced if it is preserved. The lateral roots have heaved up the asphalt to 1' in height. The tree has an average appearance but needs pruning to remove deadwood and to raise the canopy. The live crown ratio is average. This tree could be preserved if it is pruned and an island is created to increase the rooting area of the tree. In addition, the codominant stem should be cabled or rodded as the embedded chain link fence may cause internal decay which could increase the chance of codominant failure. 53 9" laurel oak 1.5 ORIGINAL ' ~ RECEIVED SUN 0 g 2006 PLANNING bkl+AFt~fM~I~fT CITY QF ('~i ~4!?~prrtr Comments: This tree has extremely poor form, dieback, low live crown ratio and is surrounded by pavement. Recommend removal. This tree may be on the adjacent property to the east. The site plan was incomplete as it did not show boundaries. 54 18' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 Comments: This palm is located inches north of a meandering chain link fence and may actually be on the property to the north. It is a very good palm. 55 14' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 Comments: This palm could also be on the adjacent property. It is very close to the property line. It is a healthy palm and should be preserved. 56 15' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 Comments: This palm is covered with vines but is otherwise healthy and could be preserved. It is growing close to the property line. 57 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 Comments: This palm is healthy but needs vines removed. Recommend preservation. 58 21" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is located 5' from what appears to be the north property line and is growing within a very small cut-out in the pavement. The trunk and root flare are good and the upper crown is supported by wide v-shaped scaffold branches. The form is average and the live crown ratio is below average. The tree has a large broken branch in the crown that needs to be removed. The tree has large deadwood and stubs and needs pruning. This tree could be preserved but needs pruning and an increased rooting area if it is to improve. *59 28" live oak N/A Comments: This tree is located 15' north of the property line and is located on the adjacent property to the north. It is included in this inventory as a significant portion of the crown and root system enters this property and per City code it will have to be protected if construction occurs at this location. 60 20" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is growing in a small cut-out island near the north property line. The tree has a 2' long 8" diameter decaying stub on the north side that needs to be removed. The tree has been topped previously and is producing epicormic growth. This type of • + growth can fail as it is not always securely attached to the tree. There are several small stubs in the upper crown that appear to have been epicormic branches that have failed. The structure due to the previous topping is downgrading this tree. The condition will improve if a competent arborist performs crown restoration on this tree. The live crown ratio is slightly below average as the crown is slightly thinning. The form is average. This tree could be preserved if the aforementioned maintenance is performed and the rooting area is increased. ORIGINAL RECENED JUN 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI1Y OF CLEARWATER ,. ° ~~ ?~9~'4CEM£N~ O~ ~~ Southwest Florida mater Management District . , ; .~~"~ ,4n Equal Bartow Service Office Opportunity Employer 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 5341448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Neidi B. McCree Chair, Hillsborough Talmadge G."Jerry" Rice Vice Chair, Pasco Patsy C. Symons Secretary, Desoto Judith C. Whitehead Treasurer, Hernando Edward W. Chance Manatee Jennifer E. Closshey Hillsborough Neil Combee Polk Thomas G. Dabney Sarasota Watson L. Haynes II Pinellas Janet D. Kovach Hillsborough Todd Pressman Pinellas David L. Moore Executive Director February 20, 2006 Lecanto Service Office Suite 226 3600 West Sovereign Path Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667-3271 Guy Bonneville Clearwater Center, LLC 1100 Cleveland Street, Suite 900 Clearwater, FL 33755 ~~'~~~ F€g z z aoos Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Subject: Project Evaluation -Permit Not Required Project Name: Clearwater Centre Inquiry Number: EX 2977 County: Pinellas S ec/Twp/Rg e: 15/29S/ 15 E Latitude/Longitude: 27° 57' 57.55", 82° 47' 27.57" Reference: Rule 40D-4.041, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Subsection 373.406(6), Florida Statutes (F.S.) Dear Mr. Bonneville: APR 2 7 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Gene A. Heath The District has reviewed the information ,you submitted on January 11, 2006 for the project Assistant Executive Director referenced above and has determined that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) will not be wiuiam s. eiie~hy required for redevelopment of the above-referenced site, which constitutes a 51,10 square foot General Counsel decrease in vehicle use area and a 13,733 square foot decrease in total impervious area, as shown on the plans provided. The information received by the District will be kept in the Tampa Service Office to support the District's determination regarding your project. The District's determination that your project does not require an ERP is only applicable pursuant to the statutes and rules in effect at the time.the information was submitted and may not be valid in the event subsequent changes occur. in the applicable rules and statutes. Additionally, this notification does not mean that the District has determined that your project is permanently exempt from permitting requirements. Any subsequent change you make in the project's operation may necessitate further evaluation or permitting by the District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning the project and before beginning any activity which is not specifically described in your submittal. Your timely pursuit of this activity is encouraged to avoid any potential rule changes that could affect your request. This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action of the project listed above. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2)' state a/I material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.C. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. ~ ~ ~'o7-d~/~~fj1-11~ 2379 Broad street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 • „s~,r ~~ <,~ ~'_s~ ~ ~~ M Equal Opportunity Employer Southwest Florida mater Management District Bartow Service Of}Ice Lecanto Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 3600 West Sovereign Path (863) 534-1448 or Lecanto, Florida 344 61-8 07 0 1-800-492.7862 (FL only) (352) 527.8131 SUNCOM 572.6200 SUNCOM 667-3271 s 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) .796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the lntemet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240.9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800.320.3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637.6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578.2070 NOTICING PACKET PUBLICATION INFORMATION Heldl B. McCree Chair, Hillsborough PLEASE SEE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS NOTICE FOR A LIST OF Talmadge G. "Jerry^~mce FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) Vice Chair, Pasco Patsy C. Symons The District's action regarding the issuance or denial of a permit, a petition or qualification for Secretary, Desoto an exemption only becomes closed to future legal challenges from members of the public ,TaeahurerNHernando ("third parties"), if 1.) "third parties" have been properly notified of the District's action Edwazd enr. Chance regarding the permit. or exemption. ;and 2.):no "third party" objects to the Districts action Manatee within a specific period of time following the notification. Jennifer E. Closshey Hillsborough Notification of "third parties" is provided through publication of certain information in a Nell Combee newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties where the proposed activities are Polk to occur. Publication of notice informs. "third parties" of their right to challenge the District's Thomas G. Dabney action. If proper notice is provided by publication, "third parties" have a 21-day time limit in Sarasota which to file a petition opposing the District's action. A shorter 14-day time limit applies to Watson L. Haynes II District action regarding Environmental Resource Permits linked with an authorization to use Pinellas Janet D. Kovach Sovereign Submerged Lands. However, if no notice to "third parties" is published, there is no Hillsborough time limit to a. party's right to challenge the District's action. The District has not published a Todd Pressman notice. to "third parties" that it has taken or intends to -take final action on your application. If Pinellas you want to ensure that the period of time in which a petition opposing the District's action regarding your application is (limited to the time frames stated above, you may publish, at your own expense, a notice in a newspaper of general circulation. A copy of the Notice of Agency David L. Moore Action the District uses for publication and guidelines for publishing are included in this Executive Director packet. Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive oireotor Guidelines for Publishing a Notice of Agency Action William S. Bllenky 1. Prepare a notice for publication in the newspaper. The District's Notice:of Agency General counsel Action, included with this packet, contains all of the information; that. is required for proper noticing. However, you are responsible for ensuring that the form and the content of your notice comply with the applicable statutory provisions. 2. Your notice must be published in accordance with Chapter 50, Florida Statutes. A copy of the statute is enclosed.. 3. Select a newspaper that is appropriate considering the. location of the activities proposed in your application, and contact the newspaper for further information ORIGINAL regarding their procedures for publishing. RECEIVED 4. You only need to publish the notice for one day. 5. Obtain an "affidavit of publication" from the newspaper after your notice is published. 6. Immediately upon receipt send the ORIGINAL affidavit to the District at the address APR 2 ~ 206 below, for the file of record. Retain a copy of the affidavit for your records. PLANNING DEPARTMf~NT Southwest Florida Water Management District CITY OF GLEARWAT :R Records and Data Supervisor 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 Note: If you are advertising a notice of the District's proposed action, and the District's final action is different, publication of an additional notice may be necessary to prevent future legal challenges. If you need additional assistance, you may contact Myra Nolen at ext. 4338, at the Brooksville number listed above. (Your question may be on the FAQ list). 42.00-047 (Rev 06/05) i ~ ~ NOTICE OF FINAL AGENCY ACTION BY ORIGINAL RECEIVED THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT APB 2 ~ 206 P NNING DEPARTMENT Notice is given that the District has determined that no is requirec~;~ OF CLEF.RWATER on known as located in Township acres to serve The project is County, Section(s) South, Range submitted by ,whose address is The permit inquiry no. is East. The permit inquiry was The file(s) pertaining to the project referred to above is available for inspection Monday through Friday except for legal holidays, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) NOTICE OF RIGHTS Any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request-for hearing must (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the. District's action, or final action; (2) state atl material facts disputed by each person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts; and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.C. A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville. address; 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 within 21 days of publication of this notice. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the District's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice of final agency action. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the District on the application have the right to petition to become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's final action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. az.oo•oa~ (Rev osro>> t • f ~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 206 NAME OF NEWSPAPER Published (Weekly or Daily) PLANNING DppARTN1ENT (Town or City) (County) FLORIDA CITi, C7r ~;I,t=A?2VJ~OTER STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Before the undersigned authority personally appeared ,who on oath says that he or she is of the , a newspaper published at in County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter of in the Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said is a newspaper published at in said County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said County, Florida, each and has been entered as 'second-class mail matter at the post office in , in said County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisementfor publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of , 19_, by ,who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. (Signature of Notary Public) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) (Notary Public) History.-s. 2, ch. 19290; 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4668(2); s. 6, ch. 67=254; s. 1, ch. 93=62; s. 291, ch: 95-147. 'Note.~Redesignated as "Periodicals" by the United States Postal Service, see 61 F.R. 10123-10124, March 12, 1996. Note.-Former s. 49.05. 50.061 Amounts chargeable. (1) The publisher of any newspaper publishing any and all official public notices or legal advertisements shall charge therefore the rates specified in this section without rebate, commission or refund. (2) The charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 70 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 40 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion, except that: (a) In all counties having a population of more than 304,000 according to the latest official decennial census, the charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 80 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 60 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion. (b) In all counties having a population of more than 450,000 according to the latest official decennial census, the charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 95 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 75 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion. (3) Where the regular established minimum commercial gate per square inch of the newspaper publishing such official public notices or legal advertisements is in excess of the rate herein stipulated, said minimum commercial rate per square inch may be charged for all such legal advertisements or official public notices for each insertion, except that a governmental agency publishing an official public notice or legal advertisement may procure publication by soliciting and accepting written bids from newspapers published in the county, in which case the specified charges in this section do not apply. (4) All official public notices and legal advertisements shall be charged and paid for on the basis of 6-point type on 6-point body, unless otherwise specified by statute. (5) Any person violating a provision of this section, either by allowing or accepting any rebate, commission, or refund, commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 ors. 775.083. (6) Failure to charge the rates prescribed by this section shall in no way affect the validity of any official public notice or legal advertisement and shall not subject same to legal attack upon such grounds. History.-s. 3, ch. 3022, 1877; RS 1298; GS 1729; RGS 2944; s. 1, ch. 12215, 1927; CGL 4668; ss. 1, 2, 2A, 26, ch. 20264, 1941; s. 1, ch. 23663, 1947; s. 1, ch. 57-160; s. 1, ch. 63-50; s. 1, ch. 65-569; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 15, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 73-332; s. 1, ch. 90-279. Note.~Former s. 49.06. 50.071 Publication costs; court docket fund. (1) There is established in Broward, Dade, and Duval Counties a court docketfund for the purpose of paying the cost of the publication of the fact of the filing of any civil case in the circuit court in those counties by their counties by their style and of the calendar relating to such cases. A newspaper qualified under the terms of s. 50.011 shall be designated as the record newspaper for such publication by an order of a majority of the judges in the judicial circuit in which the subject county is located and such order shall be filed and recorded with the clerk of the circuit court for the subject county. The court docket fund shall be funded by a service charge of $1 added to the filing fee for all civil actions, suits, or proceedings filed in the circuit court of the subject county. The clerk of the circuit court shall maintain such funds separate and apart, and the aforesaid fee shall not be diverted to any other fund or for any purpose other than that established herein. The clerk of the circuit court shall dispense the fund to the designated record newspaper in the county on a quarterly basis. The designated record newspaper may be changed at the end of any fiscal year of the county by a majority vote of the judges of the judicial circuit of the county so ordering 30 days prior to the end of the fiscal year, notice of which order shall be given to the previously designated record newspaper. (2) The board of county commissioners or comparable or substituted authority of any county in which a court docket fund is not specifically established in subsection (1) may, by local ordinance, create such a court docket fund on the same terms and conditions as established in subsection (1). (3) The publishers of any designated record newspapers receiving the court docket fund established in subsection (1) shall, without charge, accept legal advertisement for the purpose of service of process by publication under s. 49.011(4), (10), and (11) when such publication is required of persons authorized to proceed as insolvent and poverty-stricken persons under s. 57.081. History.-s. 1, ch. 75-206. 42.00-047 (Rev 06/05) • PART II HEARINGS INVOLVING DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT 28-106.201 Initiation of Proceedings. (1) Unless otherwise provided by statute, initiation of proceedings shall be made by written petition to the agency responsible for rendering final agency action. The term "petition" includes any document that requests an evidentiary proceeding and asserts the existence of a disputed issue of material fact. Each petition shall be legible and on 8 '/z by i 1 inch white paper. Unless printed, the impression shall be on one side of the paper only and lines shall be double-spaced. (2} All petitions filed under these rules shall contain: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation ofhow the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. (3) Upon receipt of a petition involving disputed issues of. material fact, the agency shall grant or deny the petition, and if granted shall, unless otherwise provided by law, refer the matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings with a request that an administrative law judge be assigned to conduct the hearing. The request shall be accompanied by a copy of the petition and a copy of the notice of agency action. (4) A petition shall be dismissed if it is not in substantial compliance with subsection (2) of this rule or it has been untimely filed. Dismissal of a petition shall, at least once, be without prejudice to petitioner's filing a timely amended petition curing the defect, unless it conclusively appears from the face of the petition that the defect cannot be cured. (5) Th.e agency shall promptly give written notice to all parties of the action taken on the petition, shall state with particularity its reasons if the petition is not granted, and shall state the deadline for filing an amended petition if applicable. Specific Authority 120.54(3), (S) F.S. Law Implemented 120.54(_5), 120.569, 120.57 F.S. History-New 4-1-97, Amended 9-17-98. • PART III PROCEEDINGS AND HEARINGS NOT INVOLVING DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT 28-106.301 Initiation of Proceedings (1) Initiation of a proceeding shall be made by written petition to the agency responsible for rendering final agency action. The term "petition" includes any document which requests a proceeding. Each petition shall be legible and on 8 %z by 11 inch white paper or on a form provided by the agency. Unless printed, the impression shall be on one side of the paper only and lines shall be double-spaced. (2) All petitions filed under these rules shall contain: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation ofhow the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (e) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; and (f) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. (3) If the petition does not set forth disputed issues of material fact, the agency shall refer the matter to the presiding officer designated by the agency with a request that the matter be scheduled for a proceeding not involving disputed issues of material fact. The request shall be accompanied by a copy of the petition and a copy of the notice of agency action. (4) A petition shall be dismissed if it is not in substantial compliance with subsection (2) of this Rule or it has been untimely filed. Dismissal of a petition shall, at least once, be without prejudice to petitioner's filing a timely amended petition curing the defect, unless it conclusively appears from the face of the petition that the defect cannot be cured. (5) The agency shall promptly give written notice to all parties of the action taken on the petition, shall state with particularity its reasons if the petition is not granted, and shall state the deadline for filing an amended petition if applicable. Specfic Authority 120.54(5) F.S. Law Implemented 120.54(5), 120.S6~RI~~O,~~S~7 F.S. History-New 4-1-97, Amended 9-17-98. RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 42.00-028 (10/99) ... • • CLEAR WA TER ESPA CIO DEVELOPMENT, LL C 1021 CLEVELAND STREET • CLEARWATER, FL 33755 PH: 727.443-1797 • FX: 727.443-6380 December 12, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department Attn: Mr. Michael Delk 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Clearwater Centre Project Dear Mr. Delk: Clearwater Espacio Development, LLC is excited to announce that it has decided to change the name of its Clearwater Centre project to "The Strand at Clearwater Centre". We have engaged a new marketing firm to handle our marketing and advertising program. The traditional approach to marketing is "out the door" due to the current real estate market, so we decided we needed a marketing firm that would think "outside the box". In interviewing multiple firms, a common response was Clearwater Centre wasn't hitting the mark as a "headline", primarily residential, project name. After researching many name alternatives we decided on "The Strand", and maintained "at Clearwater Centre" as a suffix, to continue to identify our location in downtown Clearwater and to tie any loose ends with prior marketing, so our prior marketing efforts would not have been in vain. Additionally, we want to promote our intention to develop an entirely new community within this central area of downtown, i.e. Clearwater Centre, of which The Strand is the premier. Our new website will be coming online shortly. We have deployed our landing page for the website which may now be viewed by searching "SeaFarther.com", an innuendo for the tremendous, and nearly limitless views of the gulf waters from our tower terraces. Offering some background, The Strand is literally translated to "the beach" in several European languages and of course we desire to promote our lovely beaches. One might also connect luxury and beauty to this name, i.e. a strand of pearls. With the current strength of European currencies, we are targeting these international locations. The Strand is a prestigious promenade in downtown London, and is considered by "Londoners" as the "Walking Street", certainly tying in our endeavors to promote Cleveland Street as our "Walking Street". +~ We appreciate our continued good working relationship with the City of Clearwater, and trust that you will come to appreciate "The Strand at Clearwater Centre" as the newest addition to downtown Clearwater's renaissance. Sincerely yours, a__1 Guy M. Bonneville Managing Member cc: Mayor Frank Hibbard, City of Clearwater Mr. Rod Irwin, Clearwater CRA • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 1:44 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: project name FYI. Neil, please work with Kevin to ensure Permit Plan records are updated per the name change. Thank you. michael Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Guy M Bonneville [mailto:gmbonne@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:34 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Irwin, Rod; Hibbard, Frank Subject: RE: project name Michael, Here's our letter notice of our name change for your records. If you have any questions please call or email I welcome all feedback. Have a wonderful Holiday season, Guy Guy M. Bonneville Managing Member Clearwater Espacio Development, LLC 1021 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755 TEL: (727) 443-1797 FAX: (727) 443-6380 CELL: (727) 234-7853 From: michael.delk@MyClearwater.com [mailto:michael.delk@MyClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:22 PM To: gmbonne@comcast.net; rod.irwin@MyClearwater.com Cc: HSC@macfar.com; Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: project name 12/12/2007 ~ Page 2 of 2 • Guy -From the Planning Department perspective, we think it appropriate to submit a short letter indicating a name change. We will file it and use it as a basis to update our building permit and tracking program (Permit Plain) so as to ensure consistency in how we continue to handle and record progress on the project. I do not know that a change in the DA is needed but defer to Pam if it does need to be addressed. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Guy M Bonneville [mailto:gmbonne@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:27 PM To: Irwin, Rod; Delk, Michael Cc: 'Harry Cline'; Akin, Pam Subject: project name Rod /Michael, I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving. It is most likely we are going to change our project name and we should have this issue resolved this week. Our builder is at the city today submitting our revised building permit plan set which of course still reads "Clearwater Centre". What will be required to document a change of name for our Development Agreement and/or our construction planning/permit/approval documents? Thx, Guy Guy M. Bonneville Managing Member Clearwater Espacio Development, LLC 1021 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755 TEL: (727) 443-1797 FAX: (727) 443-6380 CELL: (727) 234-7853 12/12/2007 ~ • ' jlQf.f ;t;`~ ,~, ~, :, a,r,, fir= ~• n q w~ 'l1 - .'~.. ~ .~ ~. ~ ~~c,~~. -.,qT~R. ,,~ ~~iir~i Lon~c Rntv~cl: Plnnhl~c I~I:VI:I,OI'MI:~'1' IZI:VII:W July 20, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac Keith Zayac & Associates 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITE' OF CLEAF~WATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr Orrlcl: Bc~x 4748, CLI:nxWn•r,at, Fl.orann 33758-4748 Mu~icu>nl. Sravlcls I3uu.nl:vc, 100 Solrrll MvH~rl.lt Avl:~~ur, CLIiNtWn'I'hat, Fl.cxelnn 3375< 'I'la.r•,r~llovl: (727) 562-4567 Pnx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-04023 (1100 Cleveland Street and 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue) Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 18, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit amixed-use development consisting of 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area within the Downtown (D) District with an increase to the building height of an additional 15 feet (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), and a 26-space Off-Street Parking Lot within the Commercial (C) District with a deviation to the south (front) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet, to the west (front) setback from 25 feet to 9.19 feet, to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet, and to the east (side) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height (148 feet to roof deck where a maximum of 75 feet would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the subject properties total 2.48 acres and are located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and the northeast corner of NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue; 2. That the northernmost property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the southernmost property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as both parcels are located within. the Town Lake Residential character district; 5. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 6. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. ~uim Ih,r;~~, Cui ~c.u_w[~u-,rr, I Ici~-r I lnwi:rc,x, Gn ~rn.~ut>n+r:r, Iiu.i.Jcmu,~, (:ni ,u;n.~u:>ncer Cni;ii:~ ~\. I'rrer~e,~, Ccn nr.n.>ut~n+ei: "I•:c u,ni. I~:\u~ia ,i \n:~ r ,\xn nrrucal:\ rn~i: r\c: nn~ I?,~Iri u\ rr.~~ Conclusions of Law: 1. That the proposed use of 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Town Lake Residential character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-704 and 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-704.I and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions must be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Engineering conditions must be addressed; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas County between all parcels involved in the application (15-29-15-03060-001-0010 and 15-29-15-03060-002-0090) must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a notation must be provided on the site plan stating that all existing and proposed on-site utility facilities will be placed underground; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a payment of $127,462.69 must be made to the Environmental Division for purposes of the Downtown Stormwater Service District; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a certified Arborist must ensure that the proposed swale will not impact the critical root zones of the trees as set forth on the tree preservation plan; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a certified Arborist must ensure that the canopy of the existing Oak tree located at the easternmost end of the property will not be adversely impacted by the proposed building; 8. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscaping along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue must installed to the satisfaction of Staff; 9. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the PSTA bus shelter proposed with the streetscape improvements will need to be designed to be consistent with the Design Guidelines; 10. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all Transportation Impact Fees must be paid; 11. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, must be placed underground; 12. That the non-residential uses proposed to be located on-site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 13. That the non-residential uses along Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue are limited to neighborhood scale uses; 14. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 15. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 16. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 17. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 18. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by July 18, 2007); and 19. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of a Flexible Development approval (by July 18, 2007). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tef t~yclearwater.com. Sincerely, / I ~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director cc: File S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslCleveland Street 1100 Clearwater Centre (D and C) ApprovedlCleveland Street 1100 -Development Order 07-18-06.doc Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning June 8, 2006 Mr. Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl_ 33756 RE: FLD2006-04023 -1100 Cleveland Street 811- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Tefft: ORIGINAL RECENED Juiv 0 9 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER fi General Engineering: Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Revise plans to show a precast or poured in place slab shall be installed under proposed doghouse sanitary manhole. a. This comment wild be addressed prior to building permit 2. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. Contact Don Melone (727) 562- 4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. 3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. 4. Add City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 305, page 1 of 3, Street Lateral Detail. a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. 5. Delete sidewalk details and add City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 109, Pages 1 of 3 and 2 of 3. a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. 6. Add City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 301, page 1 of 2, sanitary sewer manhole cover. a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. 7. Pay sewer and water impact fees as applicable. a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall: 1. Provide a copy of the recorded condominium plat for "Clearwater Centre". a. This comment will be addressed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Environmental: 1. Prior to CDB: Submit signed copy of Clearwater Downtown Stormwater Service District Application. a. Will be forwarded to Engineer prior to CDB. ~I~~ ~~ 407-05 Client 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keithCa)_keithzayac.com • 407-05 Client 2. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7'/z feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. a. On sheet S of 6 note number I S has been added to the plans. 3. Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to lassure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO DRC APPROVAL. a. Attached to this package is a copy of the ftre~low calculations and water study supplied by a Fire Protection Engineer. 4. An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Must be located in a separate building or provide a 2 hours separation between the generator and fire pump. Emergency lighting should also be connected. Prior to CDB a. An emergency generator and fire pump have been provided. A 2-hr. fire rated wall has been added to separate the fire pump from the generator. 5. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. A 1,000 GPM pump will be required. Sheet 2 of 6 shows FDC in front of building on Cleveland with a hydrant Sheet 3 of 6 shows FDC removed on front of Cleveland Sheet 4 of 6 shows new FDC located on N.E. Cleveland This building will be required to maintain (2) FDC's show on plans PRIOR TO CDB a. On sheet 4 of 6 an additional FDC connection has been implemented on the southeast corner of the building. 6. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB a. On sheet 4 of 6 note number 14 states this requirement In regards to NFPA-241. 7. NFPA 7.2.3.5 Discharge. "Every smokeproof enclosure shall discharge into a public way, into a yard or court having direct access to a public way, or into an exit passageway. Such exit passageways shall be without openings, other than the entrance to the smokeproof enclosure and the door to the outside yard, court, or public way. The exit passageway shall be separated from the remainder of the building by a 2-hour fire resistance rating." a. Two of the four exit stairs (SO%) have been redesigned to exit directly to the outside. Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments ORIGINAL RECENED JJN 0 9 2006 PIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLFARWATER Land Resources: 1. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This 2 I.~ • .407-05 Client plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. a. This comment will be addressed prior to building permit. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plan is to depict a stormwater pipe system for both properties off of N.E. Cleveland with each property connecting directly into the Clearwater storm system. a. This .comment will be addressed prior to building permit. Solid Waste: 1. Suggest that Dumpster staging area be larger to be able to accommodate more dumpsters and recycling bins. a. The dumpster staging area has been increased in size. Traffic Engineering: 1. Show on the site plan a turning path fora 18' scaled passenger vehicle entering the Eastern driveway. a. On sheet 3 of 6 a passenger vehicle with its turning path has been shown on the plans. Z. On the architectural site plan show the orientation of north arrow correctly. a. The north arrow has been revised on all site plans. 3. On the architectural site plan provide a note that reads: "The minimum vertical height clearance for parking garage shall be a minimum of 8' 2" from the ground to the lowest over hanging structure i.e. conduits, beams, light fixtures, pipes and any other structures for ADA parking compliance (from entrance, route, parking stall and exit)". a. On the architectural plans and civil plans a note has been added to the plans which states, "Provide 8'-2 "clear min. vertical height from entrance through drive to ADA compliant parking details. 4. Vehicular circulation in the parking garage shall be one-way to provide motorists a better turning radius and to avoid encroaching into opposing lane. a. One-way arrows have been shown in the parking levels. S. Provide right-of--way for mast arm foundation and signal cabinet at the northeast corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. and Cleveland Street. a. Per client conversation with the City of Clearwater a mast-arm will not be installed at the corner of Martin Luther King Jr. and Cleveland Street. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. ORIGINAL RECEIVED General Note(s): v ~ 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTM~T CITY Of CLEARWATE RECENED JUN 0 9 2 ao~-os C-ient PLANNING tDEPARTMEERNT 1. Comply with the current Transportah~6~I~pact~ee ~rainance and fee schedule. a. Acknowledged - 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. a. Acknowledged Planning: . 1. The parking requirement for retail sales and services is 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area not 3.0 spaces per 1,000 as noted in the site data table (sheet 3 of 6). Please provide revised parking calculations. a. The parking calculation have been revised to reflect 4.0 spaces per 1, 000 SF. 2. Large "commercial" spaces have been depicted on sheets A1.02 and A1.03. Identify the intended uses of these spaces. a. The large commercial spaces have been labeled "office. " 3. Provide the square footages of the individual retail tenant spaces and the "commercial" tenant spaces a. The areas of the retail spaces have been labeled. 4. Unless required to be provided by the Fire and/or Building codes, eliminate the following secondary dwelling unit doors: Unit 6 (A1.04); Unit 6 (A2.01); Units 2, 3 and 4 (A2.02); and Units 2, 3 and 4 (A2.03). a. The secondary doors to some of the townhome lofts are to remain. S. Provide a full floor plan for leve115.5. a. A floor plan for level l S has been provided. 6 Based upon a unit count of sheets A1.03 - A2.03, there are 85 units not 88 units as indicated in the site data table and on the application. The error appears to be on level 15 where 3 units are identified (sheet A1.02); however the plans would indicate only the second level of a penthouse dwelling unit from level 14 exists on the 15th level. a. There are 88 units, please see data chart and floor plans. 7. With regard to the off-street parking lot on the north side of NE Cleveland Street, eliminate the single space parking tier as it conflicts with the Oak tree being preserved. a. The parking stall on the north parking lot has been deleted per your request. 8. With regard to the off-street parking lot on the north side of NE Cleveland Street, the parcel on which the parking lot is to be located is not zoned Downtown (D) as is the balance of the subject property, but Commercial (C). The Comprehensive Infill application will need to be revised to reflect this and responses will need to be provided to the off-street parking criteria. The application type will not change as a result of this and no issues are anticipated with this differing zoning. a. The site plan notes have been revised to reflect a Commercial "C"district to the north and Downtown "D" to the south. Also the Comprehensive Infill Application has been revised to also reflect this information. 9. The description of requests must be revised to provide the correct number of dwelling units proposed, to request encroachments into the sight visibility triangles for the parking spaces on the off-street parking lot north of NE Cleveland Street, and to request setback reductions to pavement for the off-street parking lot north of NE Cleveland Street. a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 10. In the "Public Amenities Incentive Pool Request" portion of Attachment C to your application there are conflicts with your numbers. For example: "Eleven (14)". Correct all such errors. 4 ti ., 407-05 Client a. Revised exhibit enclosed. Il. In the "Public Amenities Incentive Pool Request" portion of Attachment C to your application there are elements stated as supporting the request from the Pool that are not applicable. Please be advised that only those items specifically listed in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan may be used in the consideration of providing dwelling units and/or non-residential floor area from the Pool. Also, among the elements listed is the provision of public parking; however this item is not reflect on the actual Pool application and further there does not appear to be any actual public parking provided by the development proposal. Please clarify. a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 12. Assure that all General Applicability Criteria responses are revised to include corrected information based upon these comments (ii.e. number of dwelling units). a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 13. The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #2 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 14. The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #3 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 15. The response to Comprehensive Infiill criterion #5 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 16. The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #6 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. a. Revised exhibit enclosed. 17 The Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application must be revised to provide a restated request based upon the development proposal having 85 dwelling units and not 88. a. Deleted at DRC. 18. Attachment B to the Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application must be revised to include only those items specifically listed in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan as these are the only items that may be used in the consideration of providing dwelling units and/or non-residential floor area from the Pool. Also, revise the number of dwelling units to reflect the 85 actually proposed on the plans. a. Deleted at DRC. 19. All Planning Departm t comments must be satisfactorily addressed prior to the applic proc~ i to the Community Development Board (CDB). Sincerely, ~ Richard Marcel ' Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL. RECENED JU~I 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER 5 • CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST' OFI'ICF. BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 1b1UNIClPA1. SFRVICIiS BUILDING, 10~ SOUTH MYR'I'I.F AVf:NUF, CLEARWATIiR, FLORIDA 33756 TILF.PHONE (727) 562-4567 PAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGF. PLANNING DFVIiI.OPMFNT RTVII:W May 8, 2006 Mr. Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: FLD2006-04023 -1100 Cleveland Street -Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Zayac: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-04023. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, June 1, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~ I '~ Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft~rnvclear-water.com PRANK 1-Iutunizn, Mnvou I3ii.i_JonsoN, Vuat-IvlnvoR ~olw ~~OIiAN, C~x;ncu~ut~usitie HUYI' Hnmurro~~, COIINCII.b11?MBlat ® Cnltu:N A. Prrr:RSrN, Cuun~cu ~uan;ral ~~1]QUAL I:MPLOYMI:N'I' AND l~l'PIKMA'I'IVH. ~Cl'ION I;MPLOI'I?R~~ • • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° y earwa ~r 1OO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE "- CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEr.: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: May 8, 2006 To: Keith Zayac, (727) 793-9855 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-04023 - 1 100 Cleveland Street (Clearwater Centre) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via a-mail at: robert.te~nmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nayclenrwnter.com ** May. 08 2006 09:55AM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 May. 08 09:54AM 01'19 SND 02 OK TO TUI~J OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'- FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, CALL 1-80H-HELP-FAX C43S-7329). Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning May 5, 2006 Mr. Robert 7efft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(a~ keithzayac. com RE: FLD2006-040231100 Cleveland Stnret (Clearwater Centre) Dear Mr. Tefft: Enclosed please find 15 sets of information addressing commenrts received from the incompleteness letter dated May 1 ~, 2006. 1. An outlined version of the Comprehensive Infll Application has been submitted. Resubmit using the most current application. Please be advised that there are significant changes to the application including revisions to the Comprehensive Infill Criteria. Also, the affidavits to authorize agent have been incorrectly filled out. a. Anew Comprehensive Infill Application has been filled out and issued as part of this resubmittal along with a corrected Affidavit to Authorize Agent, 2. The description of request outlined in your attachment "B° does not include request to terminate the nonconforming height of the existing building. a. Attachment "B" has been revised to include item number two which states, "Termination of existing nonconforming building height" 3. As per Section G of the Comprehensive Infill Application, the site plan shall include the following information: a. All dimensions; and b. Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned) a. The site plan has been revised to include lot lines and building dimensions. This information is reflected on sheet 3 of 6. 4. As per Section 4202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those speed deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application material as per the above comments no later than Noon, Friday, May 05, 2006. a. Acunowrecig Sincerely, r ~ Richard Marcel Keith Zayac 8~ Assoc' tes, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4~AY 0 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILnING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLP;ARWA'TER, FLORIDA 33756 1'F:I.EPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DFVT:LOPMENT REVIEW May 1, 2006 Mr. Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: FLD2006-04023 - 1100 Cleveland Street (Clearwater Centre) -Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Zayac: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-04023. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomulete with the following comments: ~! An outdated version of the Comprehensive Infill application has been submitted. Resubmit using the most current application. Please be advised that there are significant changes to the application including revisions to the Comprehensive Infill Criteria. Also, the Affidavits to Authorize Agent have been incorrectly filled out. The description of request outlined in your attachment "B" does not include the request to terminate the nonconforming height of the existing building. As per Section G of the Comprehensive Infill application, the site plan shall include the following information: ^ All dimensions; and ^ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned). As per Section I of the Comprehensive Infill application, depict the colors of the building on the elevation. Notations were provided in the "Building Material Legend"; however the notations and not used on the drawing. Also, provide samples of the proposed colors (i.e. paint chips) and a color rendering of the project. Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Friday, May 5, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~~~ Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.te~ft~;nvclearwuter.com FisnNh 1-Iiisi3nizn, Mnrc~u Bu.i.JoN~oN, Viclt-Mnvoe JonN nOKAN, COliNCll~ut~usr:H Horr Hnmui:r~m, CUIINCILMIiMB~:R ® Cniii_eN A. Pr-rraiseN, CcwNCn.nu:nuiliz ~~EQUAI. IIMPLOYMIiN"1' AND A18~IIZMA'I'IVIi ACTION ~:MPLOI'1?R~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 • Clearwater U FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: May 1, 2006 To: Keith Zayac, (727) 793-9855 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-04023 ~ 1100 Cleveland Street Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftnmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.eom ** • ! May. 01 2006 08:57AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 May. 01 08:55AM 01'26 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. TI-BV SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'- FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-IELP-FAX C435-73291. .` -~ ~ /~ 10.30 am Case Number: FLD2006-04023 - 1100 CLEVELAND ST Owner(s): Clearwater Centre Llc 307 Scotts Ct Bolingbrook, Il 60440 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 2.48 acres located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and at the northeast corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and NE Cleveland Street. Atlas Page: 287A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval for amixed-use development consisting of 88 attached dwellings and 21,598 square feet ofnon-residential floor area within the Downtown (D) District with an increase to the building height of an additional 15 feet (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height (148 feet to roof deck where a maximum of 75 feet would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Rick Albee Robert Tefft Applicant Rep: Keith Zayac The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Revise plans to show a precast or poured in place slab shall be installed under proposed doghouse sanitary manhole. 2. A separate right-of--way permit will be required for all work within the right-of--way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. Contact Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 4. Add City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 305, page 1 of 3, Street Lateral Detail. 5. Delete sidewalk details and add City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 109, Pages 1 of 3 and 2 of 3. 6. Add City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 301, page 1 of 2, sanitary sewer manhole cover. Pay sewer and water impact fees as applicable. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall: 1. Provide a copy of the recorded condominium plat for "Clearwater Centre". General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 1, 2006 -Page 13 '~ .i l , 1. Prior to CDB: Submit signed copy of CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN STORMWATER SERVICE DISTRICT APPLICATION. 2. Prior to building permit: submit payment of $127,462.69 to Environmental Division. Fire: 1 . PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1 /2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to complyd?BiOR Tn ~ =----~ No Comments 1- ~' No Comments Land Resources: 3 , Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO DRC APPROVAL 4 : An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Must be located in a seperate building or provide a 2 hours seperation between the generator and fire pump. Emergency lighting should also be connected. Prior to CDB An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. A 1,000 GPM pump will be required. Sheet 2 of 6 shows FDC in front of building on Cleveland with a hydrant Sheet 3 of 6 shows FDC removed on front of Cleveland Sheet 4 of 6 shows new FDC located on N.E. Cleveland This building will be required to maintain (2) FDC's show on plans PRIOR TO CDB Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRhOR TO CDB Note: Maintain in working order the Standpipes currently being used in the 15 story building during ALL construction. 7 , NFPA 7.2.3.5 Discharge. "Every smokeproof enclosure shall discharge into a public way, into a yard or court having direct access to a public way, or into an exit passageway. Such exit passageways shall be without openings, other than the entrance to the smokeproof enclosure and the door to the outside yard, court, or public way. The exit passageway shall be separated from the remainder of the building by a 2-hour fire resistance rating." 1 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree bamcade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. cI~$~S6a}31#1~T No Comments -~4:s~d=RES~.1~ion: No Comments Stormwater: Solid Waste: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plan is to depict a stormwater pipe system for both properties off of N.E.Cleveland with each property connecting directly into the Clearwater storm system. Suggest that Dumpster staging area be larger to be able to accomodate more dumpsters and recycling bins. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 1, 2006 -Page 14 ., '• V Traffic Engineering: Show on the site plan a fuming path fora 18' scaled passenger vehicle entering the Eastern driveway. 2. On the architectural site plan show the orientation of north arrow correctly. 3. On the architectural site plan provide a note that reads: "The minimum vertical height clearance for parking garage shall be a minimum of 8' 2" from the ground to the lowest over hanging stmcture i.e. conduits, beams, light fixtures, pipes and any other structures for ADA parking compliance (from entrance, route, parking stall and exit)". - 4. Vehicular circulation in the parking garage shall be one-way to provide motorists a better fuming radius and to avoid encroaching into opposing lane. `~ rovide right-of--way for mast arm foundation and signal cabinet at the northeast corner of ~~ 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. and Cleveland Street. ~~ All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 1, 2006 -Page 15 ~ ~ 1 . The parking requirement for retail sales and services is 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area not 3.0 spaces per 1,000 as noted in the site data table (sheet 3 of 6). Please provide revised parking calculations. (21 Large "commercial" spaces have been depicted on sheets A1.02 and A1.03. Identify the intended v uses of these spaces. 31. Provide the square footages of the individual retail tenent spaces and the "commercial" tenent v spaces. 4 . ' Unless required to be provided by the Fire and/or Building codes, eliminate the following secondary dwelling unit doors: Unit 6 (A1.04); Unit 6 (A2.01); Units 2, 3 and 4 (A2.02); and Units 2, 3 and 4 (A2.03). Provide a full floor plan for level 15. Based upon a unit count of sheets A1.03 - A2.03, there are 85 units not 88 units as indicated in the site data table and on the application. The error appears to be on level 15 where 3 units are identified (sheet A1.02); however the plans would indicate only the second level of a penthouse dwelling unit from level 14 exists on the 15th level. I ' •. With regard to the off-street parking lot on the north side of NE Cleveland Street, eliminate the single space parking tier as it conflicts with the Oak tree being preserved. With regard to the off-street parking lot on the north side of NE Cleveland Street, the parcel on which the parking lot is to be located is not zoned Downtown (D) as is the balance of the subject property, but Commercial (C). The Comprehensive Infill application will need to be revised to reflect this and responses will need to be provided to the off-street parking criteria. The application type will not change as a result of this and no issues are anticipated with this differing zoning. The description of requests must be revised to provide the correct number of dwelling units proposed, to request encroachments into the sight visibility triangles for the parking spaces on the off-street parking lot north of NE Cleveland Street, and to request setback reductions to pavement for the off-street parking lot north of NE Cleveland Street. ~. In the "Public Amenities Incentive Pool Request" portion of Attachment C to your application there are conflicts with your numbers. For example: "Eleven (14)". Correct all such errors. ~. In the "Public Amenities Incentive Pool Request" portion of Attachment C to your application there are elements stated as supporting the request from the Pool that are not applicalbe. Please be advised that only those items specifically listed in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan may be used in the consideration of providing dwelling units and/or non-residential floor area from the Pool. Also, among the elements listed is the provision of public parking; however this item is not reflect on the actual Pool application and further there does not appear to be any actual public parking provided by the development proposal. Please clarify. 12 . Assure that all General Applicablity Criteria responses are revised to include corrected information based upon these comments (i.e. number of dwelling units). 3 . The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #2 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. ~4 The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #3 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. t 5 . The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #5 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. 16 ~ The response to Comprehensive Infill criterion #6 does not address the actual criterion. Provide a revised response. The Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application must be revised to provide a restated request based upon the development proposal having 85 dwelling units and not 88. Attachment B to the Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application must be revised to include only those items specifically listed in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan as these are the only items that may be used in the consideration of providing dwelling units and/or non-residential floor area from the Pool. Also, revise the number of dwelling units to reflect the 85 actually proposed on the plans. 19 . All Planning Department comments must be satisfactorily addressed prior to the application proceeding to the Community Development Board (CDB). Other: No Comments Notes: This development proposal has been tentatively scheduled for the July 18, 2006 CDB agenda. In order to remain on this agenda, submit 15 collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comments by Noon, June 8, 2006. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 1, 2006 -Page 16 CDB Meeting Date: July 18, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-04023 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owners: Guy and Susan Bonneville, Sebastian and Elizabeth Dorner, and Anthony Dorner Applicant: Clearwater Center, LLC Agent: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Address: 1100 Cleveland Street and 103 Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for amixed-use development consisting of 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area within the Downtown (D) District with an increase to the building height of an additional 15 feet (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), and a 26-space Off-Street Parking Lot within the Commercial (C) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height (148 feet to roof deck where a maximum of 75 feet would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. EXISTING ZONING / Downtown (D) District and Commercial (C) District LAND USE: Central Business District (CBD) and Commercial General (CG) Category CLEARWATER Town Lake Residential DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Offices Proposed Use: Mixed-use (88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet ofnon-residential floor area) and Off-Street Parking ADJACENT ZONING / ~ North: Commercial (C) District -Office and Limited Vehicle Service LAND USE: South: Downtown (D) District - Office, Restaurant, and Vacant Vehicle Sales East: Downtown (D} District -Offices. West: Downtown (D) District -Retail Sales and Service. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The subject property totals 2.48 acres and is located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue (within the Downtown (D) District) as well as at the northeast corner of NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue (within the Commercial (C) District). Both Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 1 parcels are located within the boundaries of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and are within the Town Lake Residential character district. The subject property consists of a 151,000 square foot, 148-foot high office building with an accessory 164-space parking lot. The surrounding area consists of a variety of uses including: automotive sales (vacant), detached dwellings, offices, overnight accommodations, restaurant, and retail with these uses being located within structures that are typically between one and three stories in height. At its meeting of October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development request for amixed-use on the subject property consisting of 71 attached dwellings and 44,300 square feet ofnon-residential floor area with an increase to the building height of an additional 15 feet (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; and a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height (148 feet to roof deck where a maximum of 75 feet would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. The applicant is proposing to modify the previously approved development proposal increasing the number of attached dwelling units from 71 to 88, and decreasing the amount of non-residential floor area from 44,300 square feet to 21,498 square feet. The differences in density and floor area between the two variations of the development proposal nearly balance out, and results in a request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that is one dwelling unit or 1,881 square feet larger than previously approved. Those portions of the request concerning the increase to building height and the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height remain unchanged from that which was previously approved. It is noted that the current request includes the approval of an Off-Street Parking Lot within the Commercial (C) District, which was not identified as part of the previous request. However, the property involved and the proposed use was a part of that previous request, but an error was made at that time in the identification of that parcel being located within a zoning district separate from the balance of the property. That error will be corrected as part of this request. Development Proposal: Density /Non-Residential Floor Area: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for attached dwellings within the Town Lake Residential character district is 30 dwelling units per acre and the Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) is 1.0. As such the 2.48-acre subject property is permitted a maximum of 74 attached dwellings and 580 square feet of non-residential floor area. However, the development proposal consists of 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area, which is 14 dwelling units and 20,918 square feet more than is allowable. Based upon the above, the applicant has requested the use of 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet ofnon-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool as made available by the Plan. The development proposal's compliance with the requirements for the use of these attached dwellings and floor area from the Pool is discussed later in the staff report. Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for termination of status of nonconformity with regard to the existing building height of 148 feet (to roof deck) where a maximum of 75 feet would otherwise be permitted under current Code. The criteria for termination of status of nonconformity, as per Section 6-109, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 2 Consistent Inconsistent I. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.D shall be X installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established X in Section 3-1202.E. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use X located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfy the requirements of this section. Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable height within the Town Lake Residential character district is 75 feet. As previously discussed, the existing building that is to remain as a part of this development proposal has a nonconforming height of 148 feet (to roof deck), for which the nonconformity is to be terminated. In addition to terminating the status of nonconformity with regard to the existing building height, the applicant has also proposed the addition of a 15-foot tall "high-hat" (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line) to provide balance between the architectural improvements to the building facade and the roofline, as well as to conceal the buildings' elevator overruns and associated mechanical equipment. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Community Development Board (CDB) may consider granting an increase in the maximum building height specified in a character district if the developer of a site plan application provides a major public amenity, and the increase in height does not exceed 20% of the maximum permitted height. The maximum permitted height within the Town Lake Residential character district is 75 feet; therefore an increase in building height may not exceed 15 feet. To obtain the additional 15 feet of height permitted by the Plan, the development proposal will provide major public amenities including: residential dwelling units within the Downtown area, amixed-use project that will further the Plan's major redevelopment goals and character district vision, as well as significant contributions to the Master Streetscape and Wayfmding Plan. Based upon the provision of the above amenities, the requested additional 15 feet of height for the "high-hat" is supportable. It is noted, however, that extending above the pitched roof component of the "high-hat" is a six-foot tall rounded parapet. This parapet serves to conceal the elevator overruns within the building; and therefore as per the definition of building height (Height, building or structure), is permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height otherwise specified for the zoning district. Thus, the six-foot tall parapet is allowed. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-704 of the Community Development Code, within the Commercial (C) District, off-street parking lots are required to have a front setback of between 15 feet and 25 feet, and a side setback of between 0 feet and 10 feet. However, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, there are no minimum setback requirements. As the parcel on which the off-street parking lot is proposed has frontage on two rights-of-way (NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue), the parcel consists of two front setback areas and two side setback areas. The off-street parking lot is set back five feet from the majority of the south property line, while along the west property line the off-street parking lot has a proposed setback of nine feet at its closest point to said property line. On the north side of the off-street parking lot (specifically at the northeast corner) there is a proposed five-foot setback, although the majority of the parking is set back between 11 feet and 24 feet in order to preserve existing, mature Oak trees. Finally, the east side of the off-street parking lot has a proposed setback of five feet from the east property line. Conununity Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023-Page 3 • The shape of the subject parcel and its adjacency to two rights-of--way make it difficult to be developed without some deviation from setback requirements. A difficulty made greater with the preservation of the existing, mature Oak trees and the land area necessary to do such is taken into consideration. It is noted that the subject parcel was previously approved as it is currently proposed. In association with the balance of the development proposal as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, the requested setback deviations for this parcel can be supported. Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, within the Downtown (D) District off-street parking is required to be provided at a rate of 1.5 parking spaces per attached dwelling unit, at 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for retail sales and service, and 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for offices. Therefore, the proposed 88 attached dwellings (132), the 15,498 square feet of retail floor area (61.99) and the 6,000 square feet of office floor area (18) requires a total of 212 parking spaces. Pursuant to Section 3-1405 of the Community Development Code, when any land, building or area is used for two or more uses that are listed in the shared parking table, the minimum number of required parking spaces shall be determined by multiplying the individual minimum parking requirements by the appropriate percentages listed in the table. The following table depicts the development proposals parking requirement as per the shared parking table: WEEKDAY WEEKEND Use: Midnight 9 A.M. 6 P.M. 9 A.M. 6 P.M. 6 A.M. 4 P.M. Midnight 4 P.M. Midnight Residential (44) 100% = 44 60% = 26.4 90% = 39.60 80% = 35.2 90% = 39.60 Residential (88)* 100% = 88 100% = 88 100% = 88 100% = 88 100% = 88 Retail (61.99) 5% = 3.09 70% = 43.39 90% = 55.79 100% = 61.99 70% = 43.39 Office (18) 5%=0.9 100%= 18 10%= 1.8 10%= 1.8 5%= 0.9 Totals: 135.99 175.79 185.19 186.99 171.89 * The shared parking table takes into account the reservation of 88 parking spaces (1 per unit) for the attached dwelling units. Based upon the above, the development proposal requires a minimum of 187 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 214 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking requirement. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site and that a notation to this effect is provided on the site plan prior to the issuance of any building permits. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the provision of a refuse/recycling holding area or "trash room" at the ground level of the tower. The holding area will have access to the internal circulation drive aisles of the parking garage, which in turn access the proposed staging area on the north end of the development with access to NE Cleveland Street. Sig_nage: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 4 • Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Town Lake Residential character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan envisions the district as being redeveloped as a residential district with neighborhood commercial uses and more intense commercial and office development along Myrtle and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenues, and Cleveland, Court and Chestnut Streets. The Plan further states that the addition of new residences in the Town Lake Residential District will enliven Downtown and provide a market for new retail and restaurant development. Public Amenities Incentive Pool: To assist in the transformation of downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non- residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision of 88 residential units in the Town Lake Residential District and a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan and including landscaping, lighting, pavers and fountains along Cleveland Street, Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and NE Cleveland Street. It is noted that this request differs from that previously approved by the Board in that the former request included zero attached dwellings and 39,364 square feet of non-residential floor area, while the current request includes 14 attached dwellings and only 20,918 square feet of non-residential floor area. The differences in density and floor area between the two variations of the development proposal nearly balance out, and result in a request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that is one dwelling unit or 1,881 square feet larger than was previously approved. Based upon the provision of those aforementioned amenities to be provided as part of this development proposal, which are consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the request for 14 attached dwellings and 21,018 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool can be supported. Design Guidelines: The development proposal consists of two distinct parts: the architectural redesign of the existing 148-foot high tower, and the construction of the new 47-foot high office/retail/parking addition along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The existing tower's architectural elevations are very stark and the tower does not relate well to the immediate vicinity. The proposed revisions include the outward extension of the lower ten levels on the south, east and west elevations to give the tower step-backs within its elevations, the addition of numerous windows and balconies (tempered glass and aluminum) across the whole of the elevations, the provision of ornamental bandings (stringcourses) at 45 feet and 60 feet in height, and the addition of a "high-hat" atop the tower to provide architectural balance to the building elevations and conceal the elevator overruns and mechanical equipment. The "high-hat" will consist of a barrel the hip roof, while a decorative parapet cap with varying heights will be provided for the balance of the tower. With regard to high-rise buildings, the Design Guidelines state the following: ^ Building stories or step backs differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc; and ^ A proportional relationship between the height of a building and the number and dimensions of step backs used to mitigate the height of the building. Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 5 As previously stated, the proposed modifications to the existing tower will create step-backs within the elevations and will provide decorative stringcourses a 45 feet and 60 feet in height to differentiate various levels of the tower. The height of the existing tower will be mitigated by its setbacks from abutting rights-of--way and property lines, as well as the proposed office/retail/parking addition, which will provide pedestrian scale development along the abutting rights-of--way and create a buffer between the rights-of--way and the tower. The new office/retail/parking addition will conceal the base of the tower, and the office/retail component of the addition will conceal the parking garage from view. The architecture of the new addition will be consistent with that proposed for the tower, including barrel the hip roofs at varying heights, windows with decorative exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) trim, pre-cast simulated stone architectural columns, decorative storefronts with awnings above the entrances, and faux balconies for the upper level offices. As previously stated, the proposed addition will be approximately 47 feet in height at its highest measured point (corner of NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue), while the balance of the addition will be between 33 feet and 24 feet in height. The proposed heights are consistent with the standards set forth in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and will provide pedestrian scale development along the abutting rights-of--way, as well as creating a buffer between these rights-of- way and the existing tower. The color scheme for the development proposal consists of light tan (Navajo White-SW6126) and gold (Blonde-SW6128) for the upper and lower portions of the building, respectively, and pale beige (Aesthetic White-SW7035) for the trim and accents. The balcony railings will be painted bone white. The design of the development proposal is consistent with the intent and direction of the Design Guidelines contained within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The office and retail portions of the new addition will conceal the associated parking garage from view along the abutting rights-of--way. It is noted that within the Design Guidelines there exists a provision that it is appropriate that buildings on corner lots emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments, and/or other distinguishing features. With regard to the proposed office/retaiUparking addition, the building will not arrive at or exceed the maximum height stated in the Plan; however the tallest portions of this building are located at the corners of the property. With regard to the site as a whole, the existing/proposed 148-foot tower will provide the emphasis sought by the above referenced provision. It is noted that the surrounding area predominantly consists of one and two-story buildings with a minimal inclusion of three-story buildings, specifically the property located at 1024 Cleveland Street being adjacent to the subject property across Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. As such, the existing 148- foot (15-story) tower is neither in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties, nor is it consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. However, the improvements associated with this development proposal will result in a building that is more architecturally appealing to the surrounding areas, and the provision of the office/retaiUparking addition will result in development that is of a pedestrian scale and consistent with the scale, bulk, coverage, and character of the adjacent properties. Based upon the above, the development proposal will result in a significant improvement upon the current state of the subject property and will be more harmonious with the immediate vicinity. Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ^ Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal will result in the adaptive reuse of an existing 151,000 square foot office Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 6 • building associated with the construction of a pedestrian scale addition resulting is a total of 88 attached dwellings, 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area, and a 188 space parking garage with an accessory 26-space off-street parking lot. The proposed redevelopment will generate new "traffic" that will help to stimulate the surrounding neighborhoods and further this Vision statement. ^ Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. The development proposal will provide neighborhood and community-scale commercial uses, urban residential dwelling units, a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, and buildings located along and oriented towards the abutting streets. As such, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ^ Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The development proposal will rehabilitate and transform the existing building in a means consistent with the Plan. The redevelopment of the "tower" includes, but is not limited to, the provision of a roof top "high-hat" and parapet walls, the build out of the lower 10 floors on the east, south and west sides of the building, and the addition of ornamental banding along the building perimeter at 45 feet and 60 feet in height. In addition, atwo/three-level commercial/parking addition will be constructed around the "tower" providing pedestrian level amenities, and giving the existing "tower" the appearance of being stepped back from the surrounding properties. The level of architectural detail being provided in this renovation will transform the existing bland tower into a Mediterranean Revival development that is consistent with the quality urban design envisioned in the above Vision statement. ^ Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. As previously discussed under the Off-Street Parking analysis, the development proposal requires a total of 187 parking spaces and will provide 188 parking spaces within the on-site parking garage, and 26 parking spaces within the parking lot across NE Cleveland Street. Therefore a total of 214 total parking spaces will be provided for the development proposal, which exceeds the requirements of code and is consistent with this Vision statement. ^ Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. The development proposal consists of 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area and 88 attached dwellings within the Town Lake Residential District. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Goal. ^ Objective lA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The development proposal will provide for 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area as part of an attractive mixed-use development. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ^ Objective lE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. The development proposal will convert the existing 151,000 square foot office building into 71 attached dwellings and ancillary facilities (i.e. lobby, storage, etc.). A building addition will also be constructed around the existing "tower" consisting of 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area and 17 attached dwellings (for a total of 88). The new residences and redesigned commercial floor area will provide a more stable employment center for Downtown residents; therefore the development proposal will be consistent with this Objective. Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 7 • ^ Objective lI: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides for a Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which development proposals may acquire additional non-residential floor area in excess of what the applicable Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) would otherwise allow. This development proposal includes a request to utilize 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that will be used to provide ground floor retail as well as office floor area along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The provision of the non- residential floor area will serve to increase the viability and vibrancy of the project. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ^ Objective 2I: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscaping along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue that is consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfmding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ^ Policy 1: The Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. The development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines as it incorporates a cementitious finish over concrete block construction with decorative E.I.F.S. trim and accents. The pitched roofs will be clay barrel tile, while the flat roof sections of the building will be accented with decorative parapets. The building design incorporates both vertical and horizontal architectural elements providing relief throughout the elevations and the provision of numerous windows of various sizes and styles. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. As discussed later in this staff report, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Town Lake Residential District. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The proposed office/retail/parking addition will establish a pedestrian scale building on the subject property abutting the Cleveland Street, NE Cleveland Street, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue rights-of--way. In addition to the provision of non-residential floor area, the development proposal will also provide 88 new dwelling units within the Downtown, and streetscape improvements including landscaping, lighting, pavers, fountains and a PSTA bus shelter (the shelter will need to be designed to be consistent with the Design Guidelines). Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ^ Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in adl character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet of non- Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 8 residential floor area from the Pool. The amenities provided by this development to justify the request include the provision of 88 residential units in the Downtown Plan area and a streetscape consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the above, compliance with this Policy has been achieved. ^ Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. The development proposal will provide several amenities for the residents, including: a swimming pool with spa, fitness spa, resident storage facilities, clubhouse, and a concierge. Based upon the above, the development proposal has provided sufficient amenities for the scale of the project and is consistent with the above Policy. Town Lake Residential District Policies: The following policies shall govern development within the District, as well as City actions: ^ New construction and renovations of existing single family platted areas in the northeast section of the District shall maintain the character of the neighborhood with regard to lot sizes, setbacks and building height. The subject property is not located within an existing single-family platted area; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. ^ Preferred housing styles north of Laura Street are single family detached duplexes and townhouses. Other styles of attached dwellings may be considered upon assembly of at least one city block. The subject property is not located within the area north of Laura Street; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. ^ One dwelling unit may be permitted as accessory to a single family or two family dwelling provided sufficient parking exists on site. This unit will not be considered when calculating density for the site. The development proposal does not involve either asingle-family or two-family dwelling; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. ^ Community scale commercial uses that serve the general needs of multiple neighborhoods are only permitted on Myrtle Avenue, Cleveland, Court and Chestnut Streets. The development proposal includes the provision of large-scale commercial tenant spaces (ground level retail /second level office) along Cleveland Street that will serve the general needs to the surrounding neighborhoods. Therefore, compliance with this policy has been achieved. ^ Neighborhood scale commercial and office uses that serve the daily or convenience needs of the immediate neighborhood may be permitted on Drew Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The development proposal includes the provision of small-scale commercial tenant spaces (ground level retail /second level office) along Martin Luther King, Jr. Street. It is a condition of approval that the non-residential uses along Martin Luther King, Jr. Street are limited to neighborhood scale uses so that continued compliance with this policy can be achieved. ^ Neighborhood commercial uses may be permitted south of Cleveland Street and east of Prospect Avenue provided such uses are integral to a residential project. The subject property is not located south of Cleveland Street and east of Prospect Avenue; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. ^ Existing neighborhood office and commercial uses north of Laura Street are encouraged to remain and be renovated. The subject property is not located north of Laura Street; therefore this policy is not applicable to the development proposal. Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 9 s Based upon the above and subject to conditions of approval, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Town Lake Residential District. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-704 and 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30 dwelling units per acre 35.48 du/ac X' (74 dwelling units) (88 dwelling units) Floor Area Ratio 1.0 37.06 X~ Impervious 1.0 0.78 X Surface Ratio Height 75 feet 148 feet XZ Setbacks (D) Front: 0 feet North: 0 feet X South: 2 feet West: 0 feet Side: 0 feet East: 4 feet Setbacks (C) Front 15-25 feet South: 5 feet X3 West: 9.19 feet Side 0-10 feet North: 5 feet East: 5 feet Off-Street Attached l .5 spaces per unit 214 parking spaces X4 Parking Dwellings (132 spaces) Office 3 / 1,000 square feet GFA (18 spaces) Retail Sales 4 / 1,000 square feet GFA 61.992 s aces ~ See above discussion regarding Density /Non-Residential Floor Area for further information. 2 See above discussion regarding Termination of Status ofNonconformiry and Height forfurther information. 3 See above discussion regarding Minimum Setbacks for further information. a See above discussion regarding Off-Street Parking for further information. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.I of the Community Development Code (Off-Street Parking): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Access to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot X and approved by the Community Development Coordinator. 2. All outdoor lighting is so designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light N/A N/A directly onto adjacent land. 3. If the parking lot is adjacent to residentially used or zoned property, such off-street N/A N/A parking spaces shall be screened by a wall or fence of at least four feet in height which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or nondeciduous vine. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 10 • ~ Consistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. 'The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and anvrovriate distances between buildines. Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 11 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of June 1, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the subject properties tota12.48 acres and are located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and the northeast corner of NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue; 2. That the northernmost property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the southernmost property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as both parcels are located within the Town Lake Residential character district; 5. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 6. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the proposed use of 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet of non-residential floor area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Town Lake Residential character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-704 and Z-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-704.I and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 12 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval for amixed-use development consisting of 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non- residential floor area within the Downtown (D) District with an increase to the building height of an additional 15 feet (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), and a 26-space Off-Street Parking Lot within the Commercial (C) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height (148 feet to roof deck where a maximum of 75 feet would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions must be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Engineering conditions must be addressed; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas County between alI parcels involved in the application (15-29-15-03060-001-0010 and 15-29-15- 03060-002-0090) must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a notation must be provided on the site plan stating that all existing and proposed on-site utility facilities will be placed underground; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a payment of $127,462.69 must be made to the Environmental Division for purposes of the Downtown Stormwater Service District; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a certified Arborist must ensure that the proposed swale will not impact the critical root zones of the trees as set forth on the tree preservation plan; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a certified Arborist must ensure that the canopy of the existing Oak tree located at the easternmost end of the property will not be adversely impacted by the proposed building; 8. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscaping along Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue must installed to the satisfaction of Staff; 9. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the PSTA bus shelter proposed with the streetscape improvements will need to be designed to be consistent with the Design Guidelines; 10. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all Transportation Impact Fees must be paid; 11. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, must be placed underground; 12. That the non-residential uses proposed to be located on-site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 13. That the non-residential uses along Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue are limited to neighborhood scale uses; 14. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 15. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 13 M • 16. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 17. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 18. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by July 18, 2007); and 19. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. ~~ Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ~ ~, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity ^ Aerial Map ^ Location Map ^ Future Land Use Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)U'ending cases) Up for the next CDBICIeveland Street 1100 Clearwater Centre (D and C)-07-18- 06-(R7)ICleveland Street 1100 -Staff Report 07-18-06.doc Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 14 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert. tefft(n~m yclea rwater. com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • • Planner III City of Clearwater Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. • Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board -July 18, 2006 Case FLD2006-04023 -Page 15 s ~ x P ALAf ~ 3T ~ ~ to SALLE a t^ O ~US>: < ~+ ~ PALM 6LUFF Sf ? ~ D~1~ PAtAI $111FF ST < ~ aaco.m ~ AGA ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H®ISOUS °~~N~° 3T d m ~ ~ ~ LL ^ $ ~oa ~ s CI D ~ ~ ~ NI~L~H D~~C~ ^ CJ ^~~ ~----~ L J . ~ . ~ ~®x~ ° C-~ 0 '~ ~ EAR c~EORCU NuPtE r~ ~ o ^`~~` < PwA ~ ^^ ` ~ ~ _ ~ k ~ ~u $~a~@ 3T ^No ®^ o~os ~ ~°" 0 ~ PROJECT ~ s~T~ R° o ~ ~°~~ ~~ g ~$rE ~, ~ o ^ ~^ 8~a ~' W1RA a MENOWIXB a 3 ^Z~Q^_ ~ ~ ~ ^a~o~3 S~ ~ 3 ^ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ v~~ ~ a a^^ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ b ^ o ^~ o~C]^ ~ SS S-R60 E Z^ C~ RERCE ~o~o o ~ ~^ ^ FNANQBY ^ a ® ^~ aevaAN° ~ ^~® ~i ^~®< g ~Da^~ a ° ~~ o~~~ow°~ BT 'T R62CE D Q ST o o RE~>< ~p ~ ~ ~ _ R yT ~ Y_ Z ~Ka IIL-/'^A^J\-\I}~~ a ^ p~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ < ~~~ F~AIO2N 7~ ^ ~ ~~ ~3~~ o ~T~ , ~` ^ ^B H ~~ ~ CIR R / /~ ~IEOH EROWAELL RO~ D ^ ~~^ ~~ ST ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ COURT~Sf C~ COURT 5< 3. (~ROG^ERS $T 3 ~ ~~~ ~O ^ 1~~ ~~ ~ PINE RNE 3< ~ ~~ ° TLRNER ST L~ ~~~ ~ Z ~u ^ ~ a RNE ~ ~WJ p PINE ~ {~ ~; k9 ~ ~~7 ~ m RNE d~ _ °~ ^ ~ S < s a ~ _ ~ ~ o < . ^% O(d11O RO W ptU10 RD ^o - ~ ~~ ^^^ ^~c~ ~ ¢¢ W ° ¢ (-~~~ ^ lA A~ ~' ~ ^ j J4SMME U WAY ~ w O .IASMIIf ~ 9 ~ b ^ ~ 0~ ~~ MA(iNOL1A ~ OR ~ ~ y a ^ ^~^ ^~o ~ ~ ~ IORIS PATH o LOTU$ PATH LOTUS PATH Imes PArx Location Map Crvvners: Guy and Susan Bonneville; Case: FLD2006-04023 Sebastian and Elizabeth Domer, and Anthony Domer Site: 1100 Cleveland Street; and Property 2.48 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue Size(Acres): Atlas 287A Page: PIN: 15/29/15/03060/001/0010 15129/15/03060/002/0090 • • ir~ { a.: a r. , ~.. ~_., I j' ~ r ~~ I I _ I _.!! _~. • r ~ r ~~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ y° " • _ i ~. ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 6 x. ~^ ~ 1! ~, ~1N~1 e ~ !' .ii.,~~:.a,~r,,,r., s s ~~V`~i ~ -~a ~. ~ • ;'rte, :~° •:r ~~ + I ` ~ w~ ~^ ~ ~ f a =~ ` i. _ ~. 1 1•-~ • J ~ ~` ~ +. y ~ ~ i ~ I 1 ~~ ~ ~ ^ • 1 ~ ~ ~i a ! ~ ~ fil4~'i~q , , ~ ~. ~s ~*~ ~ !~ _ . t ;. •- ~~ ,~_ . : ~ ~~ A eriai M ap Owners: Guy and Susan Bonneville; Case: FLD2006-04023 Sebastian and Elizabeth Dorer; and Anthony Dourer Site: 1100 Cleveland Street; and Property 2.48 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue Size~Acres): Atlas 287A Page: PIN: 15/29/15/03060/001/0010 15/29/15/03060/002/0090 • __-I ~ L--J I I O j t 11 I J" l.. o"~ r-~~ O .1 ~ 1 ~ ~ -_ ~ ~-r I'~ 1 o '1"1 J 1 - ~ w~-~ J t ~ 7-~ dr+~ ~ ~_~I ~ + `~ I--I ~1-I ~ 1 j ~ j -1 j _ - -~ I I __, ~ 1 --- - ~~ ~ ~ t 1_ f 1 I i_J 1 LJ 1 1 1 t ~_ ~ ,, J16 __f r_, r~ , _ ~--, --i --- ~ -1 ~ ~$ r~-1 -1 ~-" t 1 ~` ~ 1 I I-IL.. r~1 2 -J r-- 1 i i ~--1 ~~ ~ v -J ~ t ~ I b 1 - L-J ~- ~ " I \ ~ ~i GROVE S T - 1148 ~~''~~ ' S 121 118 ~ ~ N ~ v~ .. - ~ ~di ( i; ~ ~ ~i i ~ ~ 117 ~ \ ~ ~ - \ ' ~ 1 ~ i15 ~ ~ \i 1 . r ~ \ \ 4~ \ ~~ \\y~ \~ . 111 .• I \ \ 3`' E - -ypg ~ . 1 m^ ~ i ` ; \ \\ \ ~ ~ F 1 i ~ \ 5 > \ t~~ c~ ~. ~ ; 103 CG+ ° ~ i k a E r ~ e G V LAURA ST W CBD ~ _ __ I ~ I I ~~ °-__ 899 I j 11 1 1 I I I 000 I I ._ i^\ ------ ~ --- ~ ~- ; ~ ~\ ,may' \\': i-- ---' -- 1 ~ \ 1 1 I ~ 1 $ I 1 - o o l ~ i ~ / ~~' // ' °b I ~ ~ ~ ^ am s CLEVELAND ST - a `"' 4 1 ~~~ i ; J i ~ ~ ~__, -- 1005 D C 1 I 1 1 I I I Ir~ra ~ ¢ I 10 12 11 1 ~ ~ I I i--IJ r- 1 S--'18'-- ` t7 I I I I 14 13 ~ f0 CBD ?d 1 1 B 15 ~ I CBD ~ --'----- ~ I L 1 ---- ------ L ~ 1 131 --- ~ PAR K ~ ST 4fl 41 42 I-~-£ ~ ~ --~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--------~' _ L J 29 ~---- ~ r-----'1 A6 I Future Land Use Map Owners: Guy and Susan Bonneville; Case: FLD2006-04023 Sebastian and Elizabeth Domer, and Anthony Dorner Site: 1100 Cleveland Street; and Property 2.48 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue Size(Acres): Atlas 287A Page: PIN: 15/29/15/03060/001/0010 15/29/15/03060/002/0090 ---i ~ ~ _J 1 I g ; ---~ ~j-` l 0 101 ~I 1 ~ t__~ J" 1 _ _ ~_f 110 r--1 1 ~ _, rz'-1 °i ' ~ I I ~ S 1 0 1 ~ 1 ~-~ o J o ~ I °' ~ -..a r~ -- ~GROV IT - 114s ~ ~..\' Y s 121 119 g ., -' ~ ~i t . j ~ „% ~ .'~ i ~ ~ 1 117 115 I t / _ ~ I \ \ ~\ \\\1 ~ ~~ \ @w \ '~ \ V ~ 113 111 ~ - ^ ' \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ - ;\, ' ~- , I\ ~ \ ~ \ i \ ~ . 1 \ ~ `^ :° 1 i \ \ \ ~ J I 103 i~ ~' ' ''m ~ ~ '° LAURA ST W ~ -` ' ` ~ ~ - ~ I---~ 1 999 I I J j l ---- I I Z I I I ' I 000 ~ I ~ ~ -------t _~- \ ~ \ ~^\ c~~ \ ~ D8 1 I ~ t----~ i I --I i~ Q ~ I i 1 i i \ i \~ i \ \ ~ '~ ~ I I °~ .._-v O Z $ I I o ~ t F 1 a ~ ~ f ~ / i ~'\ ~ I ~--- ----I 1 ~ Y ~ \' CLEVELAND ST q 1 I l o s ~' ~ -~- 1 y -1 r__~ -- 1005 I 1 e i i I i~~~ 10 ~ i_JJ r_ j j 12 11 I I I I ,__18~~ 17 - I I 14 13 10 20 ~ I I ~'----- - I ~v f 17 - l~ I -- - - `---- 1131 PARK ST ~ 40 41 a2 in ~ m ' ~ I-o------ ~ b o ~~ -----~ ~ ~ I l J ~ `~ 29 `----J ~ -- ----- 1 I f--------t Zoning Map Owners: Guy and Susan Bonneville; Case: FLD2006-04023 Sebastian and Elizabeth Domer, and Anthony Domer Site: 1100 Cleveland Street; and Property 2.48 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue Size(Acres): Atlas 287A Page: PIN: 15/29/15/03060/001/0010 15129/15/030601002/0090 ~r ~ I~J J ~ -II t- ~~ -I '_ ~~ t f I I ~ t_ Ir I I I L J ~ -_ _ - .. - ~-~ LJ 1-J _ ~ Y V --~ r- r'~ -t r--' 7 t ~ ~ ~~ __ 1 `oO 1 J c~ i . o} '1 j ~ I_IL ~ ° r-ji I ~ 2 m -~ ~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~ -t ~^\'i ~- i i ~-' \ : ' ' 1231 1. ~ _~ - - .. ._ \ .a ' ~., ~- .~ --- _--~ ~ I---J I I g 1 I" 1 ~ ~ i L--'~ VI i.-.~ I O n- „l J ., -L 1 I ~ I - ~ _ - I I ~~"' _ ,~-II I I 1~~ 1 o ~ "1 _~ I I ~ ~~-I I I ~ I rt_i 1 ~ -v~ .~. 1'~ 1 I ~ „ •- •- ..~- I--I ., X11 I .a- r'- I ~ '~ I ~ w f w w I - _ -Z -- r L - ,//~~(// --~I ff8 II ~=~ r ~ 1 J - e e --- ~ __ ~ ,-, ~-- ~ ~ li J ~ ~--~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ 5~--~ ~ ° ~ , _ I ~ I ~ ; 1231 - I - ~_ _ , ~, - ' 'GROV E ~ ST - 1146 ~~''` Y~ ~ 121 119 q O 5 N_ ~ v~ ^ i\ ~> > ~J ~y. ( ` ~ ~ J 117 "1 , _ ~ 1 , , ~i 1 w Q \ \i is ,~ , \ y,\ 115 ? ,-. ; 1: .,, \, ~ ,,- f13 - ; - ,\\ ~ , Vaca n t ,, , ', 111 ; \ ~ V G \ ~ V \ t I \ ~ N \ ` 0 ~ \ , P~ V z = ~ fos 'ate Gy Y ~ g LAURA ST W ~ -` ' -- --- i ; i ~ -- ~ ta~tra 999 t ~ ~ r.1 Z Offices ~ _ c_, _1 , , ~~' \ I-- - ---- ~ --- 1 ~-------, \ \ ~ , ~ ~, m 1 ' ' ~ o° ; ; °o o N ~ h v y ~ ~-. CLEVELAND ST a I q 1 1005 l 0 1 .~ i ; J __~ -- ~ ~st~ura ~ I Offices _~~~~ J om tive ~ j 10 11 j i__I 1_ ~= --~--~ ,~ Sal i 1 I 14 13 I fo N1 I j I I 15 ~ - ~ --~----- ~- 1 t 1 17 ---- i ____ 1 i L~ 1f31 1 ---- PAR K ST ~ 40 41 42 43 , -4----- ~ O OO ~~ I ~ 45 I~ ~ I - --- l-J ~ 1 `---_ ~ _ ----- -- ~ 5 I i 1 Existing Uses Map Owners: Guy and Susan Bonneville; Case: FLD2006-04023 Sebastian and Elizabeth Domer, and Anthony Domer Site: 1100 Cleveland Street; and Property 2.48 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue Size(Acres): Atlas 287A Page: PIN: 15/29/15/03060/001/0010 15/29/15/03060/002/0090 ~I • booking southwest from subject property across Cleveland Street. 1100 Cleveland Street FLD2006-04023 Looking east from subject property across existing on-site parking lot. Looking northeast from subject property across existing on- site parking lot booking southeast from subject property across Cleveland Street. Looking northwest at subject propc~cty ITOID across Cleveland Street. Looking west from subject property across existing on-site parking lot. ORIGINAL • .~,~_ .~~.~~ o~.~~ ,' iT ~~ -~ ~ - :_ ~>.,o _ _nR ~ ,_ k'~ _- a'-~ ~~ .,- 8 ~~ 999 - -- ~~ _ .. _t-=- ._. ..~ . ' r'= fit ': GENERAL UNOSGPE NOTES i`+~ ism aw ow.ow+vra.+a..aew.was.a+lv.naa~sue„..+ ! oNipwe~+dla'~~•r°e~tav~ev~.ysbi o- ! ~d~~r~rr.v~e~sal++r~r. u m ~ r ~ : ~ a, d. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.. ~. r, ~ w„~. Y„ ~. w. ,,. m ~,.. ~,,., ~., m~...>..~w.~...~sr>lr....~...~..~...4.~.~,,..~.,m AX q~Oaq u~w W.u ~uw.~ ~ J' Y~ avra~ mkn nrw •e!O wrHw~Y nrWV~ avwlvda>COem umMlel~avwry vu mn W,evV~ wa~+ Md^9 ~wcOCa>T~ •nr OUwwMnruggsM~W Ymw'I mtlr~pa~ewM~~ru~em ~ oq riW mN evw~Oa lumavn~s Ouwva~ a~wvm a m tRYrv wo~we a~wrap wlM ~a mtiVaur~v~NO~,~ b~W enaol led map ~ r LvewO~ma~ runwmxa W~ ~nww'~mo~rsle `s~emaOn r wwY. tl rxO ew s~l~~tcv Nora rurn.eMu.,wyd ^M~~nn t /+rrW~la+nm~mrwn'n9WMrlnwa~~e~eroles~lae•'P/mr~u w RT! 193wl1 t! TM wtlurotl04v~aWUmn ran~W xrrYO yyu~llwarw m..,mme.cae.a,..n.nw~.~..~~w.ww+wm.waar.,.aenr...na~n,b,.~arrsi .w.wK. a a. a.. r are~~a:a..nme.a..~°"r.r~PCa»waA.e.~.....,,..~.~.a ao.e.v w. r brwmapwCMOr9~+a~Ww wn aap ~Ownem av~ne artm~+w car~m~im `iamrma o~ab OawnY'n m W wwYM W ar rmW maOUw Ws www WmanN' mm awl 1 IeO+O~O m!u Pgst acgt4 N Pma ~6m~nY~ ! 6wlxp wtl WMann~a_rvmm~rwr rYap b MM1 ~ ms re ~ _O..o wrpOlwW~ utsH~~ubY ~a® ~ a_ J I:,1 L. M to .1. 4]. ~~ ~R3U¢ O J - y l+:1 _ p J `wo°,mti.r.. PLANT LIST wr rl~w !a ~'9vORVU^.~au Rrrtla OC Barua9wrawv prrtIXOC ~:;~ 1O"""""' ~lunn.6o ®u ip tut 3 our r m n nerx48nr~.xsu>pµ,Rrrtl iC~C -- .~ wat ~p 6 OF bIIE DF I= ~r!e !A JUN 0 9 2006 pIANNII~G ~~~ CITY (~ CLEARWATER IRRIpAT1pN NOTES "~W~^ wm^~ ~~ kw rmrf m.wNOMPgvC mO`.pa «u aarptl Wneraewn !mr ~n~~etl aRw~im~m nw~rr~ic nn~~~ Bnue~lYOyrn~~,! 1 ! rrrMb ~rualcn~q+m mrc~<~ry me~ )IIDC ~ O•aym sw etr.wq~. wryr rcu.rl' wq [1~r1~wr Y~maab~ W larmOw Cmvam~anmaml NM~vMYbM f Yrplka m~M1a ernx w~MOwwrCOVm MdO 1P ROW VM~Ib YN 'Je® ~/ ~. n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Acclueecnue RPlaming sum •~ •1.ooao~ 1543-IOt Second Shen Saruoa, Flouda 34236 941-957-4477 941-957-4157 Fa dd(a~gillettsrdccos ^ ~ Z Z O Z G ~ ~z O N O O /~ O m _~ 1L Q l7 Z_ lt~l f- z Q S17~ PLAN NORTH ~~ sca~E~ m r ~' _~ ~ ~f~/ 1 11 M X101_011 ^T ~/ ~Uj ~„' ~ z ~ `~ a C~ ~ ^^ ,~ V ~L~/ ~~ onrE:.u~E 7, zma © coovria~~ zoos SCALE: 1' 20'0' ROOF VIEW slre F~nu SHEET YUMBER: A1.01 D28' OAK iB' 0 0 26 SPACES CS b PAecMG LOT N.E C - LEVELAND ,._._ . STREE7 u Q V_ w 7 z Q Z L-, ° ~ c~ ~ ~° ; m p ~ m ~ l ~ ~~ ~ c ~ D ~ rn I~ .'~I aP~Eb w~ vELI PA~COkiLEVEL ] b3 :~~E~~s mKaL ~~.~Ei a „ A~4~ ,~° ~° - sp3 ~,.m o~";em P~uL ~evESi e Twice LeVeLe LEVEL im iiPrylCnL _EVFL it - loam i4~bm it~bm II1139] -- eNnu ub,s m m,A~ w~.LObem w~~ow~ a4ea aJ!REm P A~~ !m WTB in ~ssa3m x :~.sb eF ~ ~I3A 5F nEiA^iLm.~irom0 EN ~~ sirs P~>qN N/O^RTH ~itl ~~yQ. ( ~ 9cPLE MFfET: ~ `_ 1 " = 20'-011 n Gillett Associates ARDTa GROUP A¢lilrecwre • Planning s.a,~.,•6R:a~•Taoaoa 1543-101 5«ond Sn«~ Saresmq Fbuda 34?36 9av~s]-44n val-vsT-aul ra= aa~~v~namL~~n ~--~ V d wr F ~ z v ~ ~ 8 `~~3 .--~~ V ^ DATE: dlfc ], 2006 © COOY~Ighi 2005 SCALE: 1' 20'-0- PARKING LEVEL 1 sere PInN SMEE1 NUMBER: A~.02 ~' 7 I ~i Z ~ Y ~ Imr N i III i ~ ' 7 J .... Z ~I Q um ~ vnm i I lion I ~5 ~Z oZ c n~ ~ m~ I-v y ~ o cp n_ ^' ~ D y C m ~ °~ ~ T SITS PLAN NORTH trsn>'ulc ,..caLE: ~. # ~r'~.= 1 °..GALE NFEET: n Gillett Associates A RDT GROUP Architecture nP~ ^^ s....oa • r~c~ • l~oda~ 1543-101 Semnd Sweet SazsstNa, Fbdda 34236 941-957-4477 941-957-4151 Fu ddQgillcttardcmm VJ `~J; ' ~ "' 1 / ~ ~ V./ A ~ '~~7 PW~y~. ` ' `~'~ ~ ~ `~ F W a C~ ~ 8 ~ V U ^^ , NI./ V ~ ^ DATE. J.r~f 7, 2006 © CopyNgM1l 2005 SCALE: I' 20'-0' PARKING LEVEL 2 SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A~.®3 -~ ~~ ~ Z oz ~- ~ m0 ~p O m~ m ~ CO N v~ _ 8 rn m m ~ Z ui >, Q ~i ..~ ~~ ~i z, Y ~ .- ui _: J .._ Q ~ ... SITS PLAN WRTH ,,~~sc.uE: ~'~ 1"M 20'-0" n Gillett Associates A RDT GROUP Atr.6itccture RPlwning s.o.od-le;~•laoaon 1543-1015«ond Sncee Sazason, FIori~1 3423G 9a1-9s~-4an 941-957-4151 Pax aa~sul~AmLrom -F~-~ d Qy P~ VJ ~+ v W F W ~ ~ , ^^ ~G~! V ~ ^ GATE: MAY d, 2006 © CDDY~~B~~ 2005 SCALE: i 20'-0' LEVEL 3 srre PuN SHEET NUMBER: A1.04 UNIT O6 7 BECROO~`1 / 7~IR 3ATN Id36 5F AIL 140 SF TERRACE B16 8F TOTAL UNIT 04 BEDROOM / 7-I/7 BAiN PLUS DEN 1 BREGK AST I?dd rs 4/L d7 ~ TERRACE _ 7086 4 TOTAL \_/ Z `~ OZ ~ ~ m~ a ~~ ~ m~ D~ a v~ ~ ~ Q> m m Z T TATTT l17 1504 SF A/L 670 ~ TERRACE 574 S i0TA1 TYPICAL FLOOR UNIT 05 7 BEDROLrt / s.la BATH 7001 S~ A/L B9 °..f 1ERRALE 7160 SF TOTAL UNIT 03 7 BEDR~ / 7-'l[ 9ATu 1931 5F AK 731 SF TEgzALE 2R4 5F TOTAL UNIT O1 I BEDRCOM / I-IRBATN Itl5 5E A/C 370 S 1ERR4CE 1445 ~ TOTAL ~~ nnr~ P~ nr.~ ~NJOR~T\H I(\/~II \~ GRQPUIC SCALE: S1CALERIN FEET: ~"'/ 7~® 1/V~~ n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Architecture µPlarBfulg s.r..oa •nwM •ioodo~ 1143-101 Second Sttett Sazasor; floeda 34236 941-957-0477 947-9s7 aut Pu ddQa giBcttnrdcwm ~I./ -~-~ ~. U 6 ~ '~ ~ A 1 ~~ w p; WF'~ z V u7 V ~~jjj, ^ U ^~ ~/ ~~ V ~~ GATE: MAY 4, 2006 © CppYNghl 2005 SCALE t/8' t'~0' BUILDING FLOOR PLAN IF.VELS 4-12 SMEEi NUMB/~"EpR: 1 A Fw/ . 0 1 PH UNIT 03 79e3 s ac I'10 Yc TERRACE 903 ~ TOiAL -.. ~~~ ~5 Z Z O V' v' ~ m ~ D ~ ~ m- ~ ~ ~ D~ Q ~~ ®7 m m d~ Z PH UNIT 01 eeDROah 7 aan+ LLJ~_LJ~ W r, r, - ,ir; i ~-. II `~ ~ ~I I ITekxacE I L-J a ,. - L ~~ ~ I I ~~ ~ y~ J ~ ~n~crv Ii'3 ~~}] ; r--- . i eTAR (~~ _ A - -- --- ~n.eam -~ __.__ ~ --.-_ ~___ ..~.ni 2. ... .. .. . ~~ ~ r -- -- we I 'mom"..'' I ~-~~_ n I~-141..~x I I .. _ .cm - / ~ ~ j eLt . ~ eLLV. eLey. ~ ~ i i I ' t f -~. i i ~~ I r-- -~ i I ~ ~ ~ ^~T ~ Knpo+ ~ I Lover II I L~r ; ~ >i ~~ ~~,=11 ~ -- -- _- -- -- rw+e ~ O -- ~ `~' ~~ 21.1' ---~ mxE7 ~I ~ Lti J. p.eaiu ~: II~_-_lr HUIER DFN r ~.~ _ wCIiFA SNE _I ,r~~ nasrLn carte J peen I I ~ ~~~ ^ _ rorc~ Q ~- I ~ i _ WIL `fY .: I I ~~~ ~ II l I L~- i t -" p '- J _ _f i _ ` - I ~ _ --~-~1 I I t I 'V ` -. ,nab IWL I I ~. . BEOFtat2 _ .I- 1 "LmR+' I I 1 I LI94T. 1 %.'..i eRaw sua _ ~ _ ~_ L~ Ili: O u: I -- I ~ ^ I r r ~ ~ i I. - I .`~ GALLERY I ~ 1 ~ I- ~ ® - proems - ~ - w~ I - t~-~ owex I~~ -- I I ~~ I ~ I I FMALT l ~ I I ~-lL_l__1 SIT --- o__ ' I' ~;, PH UNIT 04 i ~~-- i w~l ~I' i ""~~r~~ ~~n 3~r- _ _ rSTaIR '' ~ ~' ~ I I ~ _ s=_DROOn i earu I C ~"~ I ~~S~ - 1- -1,~, , s~!--j I ' 3393 ~ A/C r}~ _ J _.~ ~ G„~~ L. _'j 649 Ef 'cRRACE L~ ---.- _ 9957 sE TcraL ..I r-r-r i ~--rTln~l i -- ~~-r-r-~"n-n~~n~~-,-~~ ~ I r~T-nn-n--ln-I I PENTHOUSE FLOOR 1'f I i.'~~ITl' 0'' aEDRODn i ean; 7428 9F AiC 418 S' TERRACE 7846 ff TOiAL NORTH FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: SCALE IN FEET: ~D n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Arclilttrnve RPlavning s,r.,.,av • ~. t~do~ I54}101 Second Snec~ Saraao~ Flovda 34236 941-957-0477 94r-957 415] Pax aapg~uemmeppp~ ~~ (~ ~ U V~ ~ ~ ~ /~1 j ~ z U d. G' U ~ ^ DATE: NAY 4, 2006 © Copy~igftl 2005 SCALE: r/8' 1'-0 ' BUILDING FLOOR PLAN PENTHOU SE LEVEL i3 SHEET NUMBER: A2.02 n Z Z O `~ ^ ^ V' L` T O / ~ O ~ m V' D~ °N ~ ®~ m m o ~ Z "'~ PH UNIT 04 3ECROGI' / 04Pa 3303 } A2 049 SF TERRACE 3957 ~ TOTAL PEN7~4OUSE FLOOR 1640 $F A/G 1015E iERRAG 1841 5° TOTAL I'1 1 l.!~tTC ll3 BEDRORI / BATH 7418 SF A/G 418 5F TERRACE 1&6 SF TOTAL NORTH FLOOR- PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: ~~ 1 e 4 a B ~, 1m - - n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Azchiucnue RPlariniag Suaw~ •Mipmi • Condor 1543107 Second Stcet Sansnr; Flodda 34236 947-957-4477 ' Y41-957~15T Fax dd@giBettazdcmm ^ ^ , ^ ~I.J 1 T V 6 .ti, Cf. ~ l ~ r" W I d g ~ V ^^ , ~L~/ U ^ DATE: NAY a, 2006 © Copyrig~i 1005 SCALE: 1/8' 1'.0- BUH.DING FLOOR PLAN PENTHOUSE LF.YEL I4 A E IN FEET S SHEET NUMBER: C : L 1/8" A~.o3 PH UNIT 03 - TH 1ST FLOOR eEDeocn / BA1u ranuousE 1981 s a/c PH UNIT 01 350 SF iEZ¢4.'-E BEDftOd'1 / 3ATH 3331 fF tOTAL n~~-_---_--~ PH UNIT 04 3EDR~h1 / eAT:I A ~ (' ~L~y 3303 °r AK 6d95F iERQAC'e 3952 Ef TOTAL i O ~ ~ O m ~ ° ° ~ -+~ 47 ~ D ~ o ~ m o~ Z --i PENTHOUSE FLOOR 7640 $F a0 z0i ~ iErzeacE 2841 8'r 10TAL 2618 $' a0 418 5F TEfiRACE 2846 5F TOTAL NO7R~TH FLOOR PLaN \~ GRAPHIC SGALE: SCALE IN fEEi: CD 2= _=~ ~~ 1 ~g„ n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP At<6itecnue 0.Plannillg tsa3-tot 5«ona sr~eel Saruot~ Florida 34136 941-957-4477 941-957-41St Fu ddQn ~Vettardtmm ^T ~/ ~, 6 '~ U~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ w °i ^^ ,~ V ~1./ V ^ DATE. MAY A, 2005 © Cooyri0ht 2005 SCALE: i/8" t'-0- BUILDINC FLOOR PIAN PENTHOUSE LEMEL IS SHEET NUMBER: A~.©4 PH UNIT 03 - TH 2ND FLOOR eEDrzoDn / saiu rowvHausE 19a- s ac PH UNIT 01 350 E.F_EERAGE BEDROOM / 3ATN 3337 Y TOTAL _sme,..o n Z Z ~ _ O~Z n ~ ~ mO n ~ r D ~ m In ~ ~ ~ -i O m Qa m ~ Z --~ SECOND FLOOR J R.. ~ ~ -, I C~I ~ ~ , _ ~ J .- _ -..._. ~ ~ L DINING fd'I I ~ - I~° LIVING h1J''I. ...~ ' -= -- _~ it ~__.._._. I -. 3-~~ ~~ `: ~'I ~~-----_____ ~. I -../ I FIRST FLOOR ~-~ --- ~i KITHGEN ~~ I T= u~i~ II/T~ II UNIT AREAS: AC IST FLR • 1384 SF . AG 1ND FLR • 663 SF 70TAL = 1045 SF C ~iiit'tl:\~'<ri~, lR lf5 3 BEDROOM/3BATN ~"coaPO .. ao Mi)ir,ri.umr ~I'6~r:~,.l,..r I:.. .I .. i. i:li...~. d--~ Q~ _ ¢ ~ '~`'`_' ~ I ---- J U A d o ~ MASTER ~ ~..~k' W SUITE I ._ _ ~ ~ v I ~ ~--~ I i i ~ ~ ~ ~~ --ii i h~' ~ ~ SIRING ~ , - V ~ RQOM I - I,JI` I OAIE MAY 0 2006 © COFYl pl~l 200 FLOOR PLAN S°^`E ~s 5"OWN UNIT 02 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: I' 0' 2' d' '6' 0' 10' ~ ~ ~ r~-r 54EEi NUMBER: SCALE IN FEET: 1 /4" n 5 Z ~ Z ~ ~ m '~° ~ ° rv m~ _ H D ~ o° ~ m v~ Z y _ - I I --_- I /S 0 xvalt ~~'j~i' -- a - ~ ~L. o a P.'' , I MA TER SUITE ~ ® B~2 l.~ ~~ a, JI ~ ,l AT ~nI L _ __ I_ _ i v ~ -.- - r ~ !1 -- ~-, i SEGOND FLOOR FIR57 FLOOR u~i~ 11311 UNIT AREAS: AC ISi FLR : b% SF AO 2ND FLR = 698 SF ""' TOTAL = 13% SF ~,li~~tl ;~~,q~i li;APr`;: 2 BEDROOM / 3 BATH .\ I: 11 1 i I K ul I' H ~ o ..o... E o ` ' l c,, ..I: ~.; Ili ~~ 6 ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ C~ V ~ UA'I'E MAY a, 2006 © c~ovruel zoos FLOOR PLAN SCALE AS SHOWN UNIT 03 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: i' B' 1' 4' B' B' IO' ~ ~ ~~ SHEEf NUMBER: SCALE M FEET: 1 /4" SECOND FLOOR -- - -~ I- I I : : I• I - ~ FOYER I ^ ~ ~L AIJND . ~'C".' R I I _ _ _ ..._ _J - ~ pp ~~ ~i ~ ~I .~ CD -- _ I I t i .~~ i - - I _. ---- - : ~ KITHCEN Z J ~ Z O ~ ~ Q I ~ I. LINING W1.1 ! ~ - 1 -i ~ '~ [~_ - ~-o ~ r ~ m 177 n ~ ... --- ~'' ' l _ _ DINING RM I--I ~ O 1 0 ~ co I ,~ ~ - I) -- - '=: ' - I i Vii:-_~ - ~ ~ -~ 0 p ~ I it i -- --___ ~ 7-_i __ _-~ I i I I ~ I I ~ rn rn m ~ Z FIRST FLOOR uN~~ II~~II UNIT AREAS: AC 1ST FLR =855 SF n ' ' AC JND FLR =855 SF " ' TOTAL ~ I'110 SF 1BEDROOM/3BATH :~I: tol o~NUI~I' m.61;., 0.::c., n .. r e o ^ ^ ~ ~/ ~, U~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~~ U DAiE MAY <. 200fi © Cop Y~iyi~t 2005 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN UNIT Oa FIAOR PL4N GR4f'HIO SCALE: I' 0' 1' 4' b' 8' 10' S4EEi NUMBER: SCALE IN fEEi: 1 /4" ~ ~ , SECOND FLOOR 1 r j ~1 _.~ _~ r I r-o Y ICI `.I I -- ~ LIB ING d-Li ~~ ~ I i i ~ . ~ I j O Z t..,. I ~ __ i-I ~ f ~ L I J -_ __ I _ FO7ER I'- l'1 G1 H I ~ O m O m = = IIICI~'- ' I ~ I ~GL. m .~, ~ V~ I ~ ?'~ ; ;~ , - --- ~_ ~ 1LL - I - - - - - -- .~ N ~ ~ I ~ I -DINING p ~1.I~_I f_- i ~ KITHCEN i - - _ n' J ca ~9 - I t -~ I , ~ L~L_J ~I__ ~~ __ .» FIRST FL OOR uNi~ II/T~II ~/ UNIT AREAS: AC IST PLR = 1131 5F ' ~ ' AC 7ND FLR = 1131 SF " ' ' TOTAL = 3274 SF c;~n~u n,«I~~~I 3 BEDROOM / 3 BATN -~ ~` U ~ = o• It Cl c I' rHli.on awlr~o UI: .. .~I.i,.~~. ~1._:,..1_L.. -1-r T n , ~I./ 1 ' T 6 ~i tt '' ~ U tk ~ Y~K/ t i U U .-a V DATE. MAY 4,2006 © Copyriyni 2005 FLOOR PLAN SCALE. AS SHOWN UNIT 05 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: I' 0' 1' 4' 6' 0' 10.' , SCALE IN FEET: 1 /4" SHEET NUMBER: ~ ~ • l I UNIT AREAS: AC IST FLR = %0 SF I I I 1 ` ~ I ~ I 41vING RM. I ~ i J I la 1 I__ l I ~~ ~l__ KITHCEN Z _ tom, I!I I ~- o ~ O O _ _ -_ _ _I o"'o ~J _ ~ DINING RM. i ~ -. ~ ~m ~ ~ m ~ CL. I ~-~ ~ D o ® - - ---- f _-_ ~ I ' D ~ rn FIRST FLOOR ~n m ~z ;...,. i , I FOYER- II 1 BEDRCOf1 / 3 BATH FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE_ I' 9' 7' 4' 6' e' Ifl' ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ SCALE M FEET: 1 /4" n ~ " ^ ` ^ ~1~! ,~ ('''~ ' 1~ 1 ^^ ~~ ~L~/ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w V U ~ ^ DAl'E: MAY d, 1006 © Cauyi iyM1t t00! SCALE, AS SHOWN UNff OB FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A2. ~ 5 SECOND FLOOR UNIT' 11~~111 UNIT AREAS: AC IST FLR • l90 SF AC 1ND FLR = l90 SF TOTAL = 1580 SF Z BEDROOM / 3 BATH SECOND FLOOR n ~ Z Z D -mo ~~ ~3 m m ~Z -i rC1.L1 - - o o - ~ - ~ ,I ~---~~---' LI DINING RM. j J ~-._ i o ~i ~=1..~ ~r ~, KITHCEN. I L'Al1NDRY ~ I1 ~1; ~ f ~ I DIVING Rt'7. ) I ~r. , i __ ~.- I I FOYER . LI. i ~ _- ^ ~ ~ 0 1 _L_~ I ti ~~~ ` _ R ~ cL. I m IIII ~ ~~ FIRSt FLOOR o ~' 0 o~ FLOOR PLAN GR4PNIG SCALE: I' 0' 1' d' 6' B' m ~ ~ SCALE IN FEET: 1 /4" n ^~^ , ~L~/ j~ U ~ Q~ ~ w z ~ ~ J--~~ ~ ~ U vl • DA fE: MAY a, 2006 © Copyriynt 2005 FLOOR PLAN SH=Ei NUMBER: A~.16 Z ~v m C D C ~ ~~ m m e0 Z Z 0 CD N O m~ m~ O I I1~1~~ II/71Q11 ~/v UNIT AREAS: AC IST FLR = l90 SF AC 1ND RR = 190 SF ""' 70TAL = 1580 SF 1BEDROOM/38ATH C,iil it ;\<=r ~,';P i~,a Ii l<I~I (;KOiI I' ~~ °°..'°R. °° . , ~,. ~, ',i,.,. ...w, ua' .. ,~ri::,,,:~: ~:;.i 3 " ~ ^ ~ ~L~I ~~ ~ ~ ~ v , ~ ~ ~ ;a j{ V ,:a U ~~ V ~ DATE: MAV a, 2006 Q Capy~iRS~ 2005 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN UNC[ OB FLOOR PLAN GRAPFIIO SCALE: I' 9' 2' d' 6' B' I0' ~ ~ r~ r SHEET NUMBER: SCALE M FEET: 1 /4" SECOND FLOOR ,~ ~f~-. ~~__ ____~I` i I LIUINCs-RM. ~ t-.r,, ,~,; i _J: ~ ,,,,; ~~. GL. ~~ ~ FOYER ~~ ~ - ___ _~olNl~~, p ~~r -I I ~~~- ~ KITHGEN ~ I LAUNDRY FIRST FLOOR u~i~ II/T(all f 1 -- o o - --I _ - - - L llII fl:_.. I I ` I ~ ~ ~ NING ~1 D _ n _, ~_~ KITNCEN 1 I _ _ I d s i ,a =11 ~ ~ _ 1 -U _. i ~ _ lt- LAUN~f I Il - I ;---; ~ (1 -_ I \ ~ _ _ FI ,.n Z ~ ~ o I: i I--------~ ~ .. ~I ~ ~ ~ FOYER ----- L- - -._ _ _J. 0 ~ _i~ __ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ _ _ i i i R CL. I. i i i L ~c ~ C p . m m c o~ FIR57 FLOOR Z UNIT AREAS: AC ISi FLR =845 SF AC ZND FLR =845 5F TOTAL = 16:0 SF 1 BEDROOM / 3 BATH FLOOR PLAN GR4PHIC SCALE: r a• r A~ 6• e• ~ i ~~ SCALE IN FEEL 1 /4" ^^ ~/ (~''~ i ~y ^ ~ VJ U U~ ~ .~' ~ ~--~ ~ w ~ ~ ;W~j{ ~ U „7 V ^ ~/ V ~ DATE: MAY a, 2006 © Copyriyn~ 2005 FLOOR PIAN SHEET NUMBER: A2. ~ 8 SECONpFLODR UNIT "i~" SECOND FLOOR . ~ ~ ~ ----' ® '' cL. ~ i ~ - - -~-- -- J 1 _ I P' I I FOTER -I ~ ~ '_ : ~ -; I -~ ~ I _ I L ~ I ,, ; ~~ r .. I _ r~ , I ~~ _ , ~ ~ LAUN F i I J I ~ '~ O Z ~ ~ rT1 ~ III L r ' _~ :i l RINING I J ~ -I i ~ KITHCEN ~ f n p m~ I-----_-I I - ~ ~ ~" I I r ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ --~- - . r _ ~ _ o o J -- r_-1 ~ -o ~ ~ 0 ® O i I ~~ m o~ m FIRS7I=LOOR UNIT aREas: AC IST FLR = 845 5F AC 1ND FLR =845 SF TOTAL •1690 SF 1 BEDROOM / 3 BATH FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: I' 0' 1' 4' 6' B' I9' SCALE M FEET: 1 /4" n S^^"',,~ ~lI/ +~ i C ~ . t ~ ~ ~ w x I ~ ~ I U V ~ ^ DATE: MAV a, 2006 CopYri9~1 2005 .,.~~,.. ~~I. ~~ SREE'f NUMBER: A~. UNIT "11" UNIT AREAS: I BEDROOM / 2 BATH v I _. ~ ee~aoz - ' y f ~ .~-.__.~_ l.- I_I ~ ~ - - I l i i I ~ r-- ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L~/ I~ ~ ® - LIV NG Po"I. I~ I`-~ ~'" i - OHO r }~~ ~ a UNDR. .. i ~ ~ t? ~ _ - o KITCHEN. ,~ L ------- ~ ' ' 6 U ~ 1~ ~ L1 I - I III - ~ DINING ~ I r -- -~ _ -FOYER - T.--r i I L, - - -- - ~--) ~ w ~ ~ ~ i i I I ~ --- -- .4~ F W F ~. L I ~ ~ o3 III MASTER SUITE ~ _ v l i ~ i---- M. BATH . ' ~ ~ -- ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1-==-=-r=.f ~ L- - Z ~ `O ~ ~ m~ m ~ m ~ ~ -*~ In 0 ~ y a ~ ,tee m.. ~Eaa.~ ~o.,~o~. ~ T o~ u. ( I - DA1E~. MAY d. 2006 © CoFYriy~t 2005 ~I FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN URFF 1, FLOOR PUN GR4PHIC SCALE: I' ®' 7' d' 6' 8' 19' SHEET NUMBER: SCALE IN FEET: 1 /4" ~ ~ ~ o UNIT "12" -v ~ Z Z ~- C ~ m O 4~ (~ O ~ m 1n m m ~v ~ v~ ~~ o ~~ m m ~"'~ UNIT AREAS: AC=1031 SF "'" TOTAL = 1031 5F Gtilii~ :~«uCtilfes I BEDROOM / 2 BATH >, I: U I (i U, U I: I' li:.: i., .. _i_~J:: ,.,.. `I~1 ~~ .~,~.jj ~ ..a V ~~ ~ z ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ CC3 U ~ DATE. MAV a. 200fi CaFY~i9St 2005 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN ON[T l2 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: I' 0' 7' 4' 6' B' IO' SCALE M FEET: 1 /4" SHEET NUMBEO: ~ ~ . UMIT AREAS: AC = 1211 SF tOTAL • 1111 SF 1 BEDROOI'I / 1 BATFI A I: I l! (i It i l i~ I' N c o a . o c . r a I t , L „o.. c,as ~ :... ,.:._.,..... ~~ Z ~ ~~ m ~ ~ ~ [T'- ~ D ~ _ ~ m ~ ~ D~ o v~ ~ ~ Q7 m m Z ^~,1 ~/ ~~ C V~~ z w v F o' ^~ ~/ U ^ DATE: MAY a, 2006 © CoVYrip~l 2005 SCALE: AS SHOWN FLOOR PLAN UNIT l3 FLOOR PIl~N GRAPHIC 5CALE: - I' 0' 7' d' b' 8' I®' ~ ~ ~ S:iEEI" NUM9ER: SCALE IN FEET: 1/4" A2.22 ~Z z OZ Z m0 ~ m ~ m ~ O ~ _ ~ o y ~ ~ ^' 0 ~ ~-~ ~ o rn m m ~ Z UNf~ "1~" uwt a~as: AC = II"15 SF "' I' TOTAL = 1115 SF C ~illetl :A.g=~ rriare's 7 BEDROOM / I BATH ,A I: I! I t. it U t. P In' .... .,I ri 1--.~ viL. r~ 1.r;h.o ~~:: T ^ ~ ^ ~L~/ ~ U~ ~ o ~ z A 1 ~ U ~~ d, V ~ V ^ , ~3~/ ~~ • U ^ DATES MAV d, 2006 a~ Cee Yri8~1 2005 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN UNIT 14 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: I' 0' 2' d' 6' 8' 10' SH~Ei NUM9ER~ SCALE IN FEET: 1/4" A2.23 ~s ~Z z o~ r nv S~*+ m ""~ ""~ m m ~ Z 3LDG MATER'AI_S LEGEND: W4LL FN'154E5: ~. rermm~on rPa.,em RAF: a.. a.. ~,~ «,w s,smt a~. ~~~e~~'~non.ww Mv. TPo`1 r acct •s .n~ ..amre.~~«~oeN~/o.tno„w.rc. W ,o~ov owe, .. ~~; aoE~,,.~u~~,w,a {~UA~Lv'AILS /H4VDRAILS Dore ume o~.ammn.vu+~n~mv.oiassruuwe0. srsa ~~Ew ~o >. vcc~e~ avow ~n gum®i , n.e. occowmc raven e.wGOV Uirsrnwrtr..xa~a af ~ POOL SECTION DIAGRAM ~~ .~Y~ oho a .e_ipmtg~ 4s-L-_- +~ve~-n_... .....--_ -.----------__-_-_---_------__._-_._-_ ~~z-----_-_-----___-_-_-_-_--__.__-----.--_.--- I I z`51 m ~ m0 ~ ~~ o v~ Q) ~i "~ Si I e.am acre as , p-i tmn s~lovrrexmn 5 P3 ' „ M1S~y~ ~:I j P2 p '. II~ ~ ~ I acil",la -~1 F: ~ I P-2 , ~ I ~ ~ ~ R ! ~ W -~j ~'!Il ~-iI LLJ I , , i ~ i i . Ira ~ P3 P ^ r ~ I i~ ` ''a ~ ~~gw.ar~~isa.~'iw'° ` 9 r F I~ SOUTH ELEyA710N ~~8 ~~~ ^~~~^ Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Aichi ecmce RPlanning SHwr, •:._ . ~ l~.doo 1343-101 Second Saeee Sussoa, FlourL 34236 947-95?-44iT 941-95'-41St Fas ddQa gillcttudccom r l ~{~ /{ ~G/ 1 T a n¢ C ..1 ~ II ~~ C , ~ .. F+ L (~ A \ W. V F 0.i i-~ U ~ ^ W _ DATE: J.4~p3pRY 22, FC6 G Copyright 2005 SOAIE: 1' 2c' O" NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SH°ET NN UN9ER: 66g L1~ ~ n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Ardvxcture APlaming Samo¢ • L4ami • Iovdov 1543-101 5«omt Shea Sazuom, Flouda 34236 941 Ail-4477 941-957-41 it Fu ddQ~llam~dcwm f7 Z r ~ ° m G) ~D D ~ N ~~ ~ ~ Q> m m ~ Z -,-:~. ~a e:L wui euv wvwmw~mT - ~ ~' ~- msccnrexmn T~ A G.~ r{,aaAm a. ~ ± ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ p ~ ~ q p~~ Y T.I ~v4v ewo ccm'avxr~f- ® ~ ~ rFrx w G-I .. ~-... - $~ W ~ ~ ~ __-__-----149-4FI ~ ;® ~ ~~~~ - ~ ® ~ ~ ~~, _ -dP --- ---- ~' F3 dare euo\ ~ ~1 _ F.~ ~~ ~ ,,,~ _ » P3 ~- ~1, ~ ~ ^ -- ~R q~ 1 mav 110 ~ _ I o- i:i~ r .~ k. 3,~ J '~ ~ C~'~~ }~ - -_- -~~~e - - L ae s'oa rtaarraTat r, •u NB ~wdrs d~o J ewTa'~eraarmn WEST ELEVATION II ` ' T ~ ~/ Q ] 1 U '- ~ . w 2 -~ a ~ ~ ~ U r] U s ^ DATE. JlWU.ARY T,2WG © cuor~~anr =_ao= SC 4LE: ~' - 20'-0' RASE & ri'RST ELEV9TIDN5 SHEET Nt1MBEP~. n Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP A¢hicaare 0.Planning $an~on •h4wu •toudoo 1543101 Second Saett Sarasom, Florida %2ifi 941957-4477 941-9>7-0151 Fcc ddQgilletta-dcmm _ ~cE _ ixfcrriu _____. x~'-moa o. we_-_. _. ~.r ecz t=om== ~~=~- ~~~xro _. ~r ---- ;i.t le~ __ ._ f7 Z OZ ~v ~D m m ~z c...s ~ m~ r^ ~ V' Q v Q Q7 .-_---._-___.-.-__.____-_-___-_--___._.___ /r 'I"'.. ~ ~ xr7 uw ccnra~ ne - ~:O ,O --~8 ~F _.. .._. 1 ..-_--_ __- i r' -' TJ / ~ Ili I ~ i VIII ail ~I`., ~:. -- ~"r'im ~ -, I. ex 1 ~ NORTH ELEvATION 5-~ 4., +~ 4J c ~ ~ ~ /1 1 / ~ ce ~ w U ~' ~ ~ ~ d a U e~ DA-E, .NNPRY 22, 2006 CJ .. PY~'O~t 2001 Noxrx ELE6ATION SFEET NUM3E4: X3.03 Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP r~cchivsmTe gPlmvog Sussoo ~ M.,...; • l.wdan 1543101 Second Sacec Sarasoca, Florida 34216 941-937M77 941-957-4111 Faz dd@gillecrudccom ~~ -v n Z Z ~ _ OZ 47 Z m0 ~ m O ~ m ~ _ 0 ^ ~/ Q) m m ~Z Tc ~_ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ ..,,~ ~ ~ I ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~. ;~, ~' i ' ~ - EAST ELEVATION - ~~, --------="=s - -_ °P-Lames _.. -..-__.-.~seauq i-~i Q.~ -1--~ C.U CCS V ^ `4 iE~. JN9IAPY 22, 200G C1 CooY~i9~~ '-005 W SCn_E: 20' 7" WEST ELEVdT70N SHEET NUM2=R: A3.04 a a ,~ A~ G F w w v a g U L ORIGINq~ RECEIVEp ~~ ~O~i~ 1 ~ rr ~,~~. r~. i #_~ P '.~ S i 1 1~ >~ o f u a.~,z rr~-'~-- ~".~?~`° ty.-~^~tf6tmrw ~'~ .. ~.arde'~_ ,_ - ... .._. ~!"` ~ s.,1~"SICJ~~.~~ti::~'~a'~~:°"~+~'~ t',. k Ir#,: 2007281902 BK: 15950 Pr• 804, 08/24/2007 at 12:55 PM, :CORDING 3 PAGES ,, $Z /."00~ KEN BURKE, CLERK ~ COURT PINELLAS t:OUNTY, FL BY~PUTY CLERK: ~ CLKDMC4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR _ CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 ~~~d~ - U~-o 2~ DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE Property Owner: ~ ~t4~cy~>~ r~S~~e ~ O D>~ ~ r~.oP~t rw i , LAC Property Address: OD LrU L~ D ST /{-f2.C~L S I S ~~ _i~ - a 30 6~ -~ i-~ I a 4se~~-~-~~lr.Q lega descrpt~in.) l5'-.~y,. iS~o3o60--~~-c~o9o KNOW OF AL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property (legal description) situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit: S ~a o~C.~.aa \~.a~ar a,n.~ ~r p1~ o.... do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF T r.TLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. 'Chat the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. ,/~ Signed, sealed, wifiessed and acknowledged this o~ a ~ ~ day of )~ U C",-t,(g 1 , 20 ~ 7, at Clearwater, Florida. i tO~ y 1n'1 Co 'vl ¢~ Q t kC Y1~(P vet ~ Y' a i A i c yr r t.vicw~+ COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was adrnowledged before me this a 1 n day of KAR I KOWALSKI /~ u g u 4 't' , 20 0 7 , by t f wy tt1 , (3 c~ln ~.: Q ^~ouuy Public - SIa1B d Fldld~ c® behalf of whom ttr- ipstrument was execs ed. f _nny ~onwNsfbo EspYee I,Iht 16. ZOtO ' F~~f ConrtAnlOn / DO SS9tte ~~ ~~~~'"'-~- Notary Public Signature '- °i.~ :• " Bgid~d dr NNIOIIat Ntlhry MMt. / ~ . _ ~(~ ~ D ~J /} L s~~ Name of Notary Printed Notary Canmission Number. ~ ~J t l S~ ~ ~ ( i (SEAL ABOVE) Personally lmown / or produced identification Type of identification produced P~NELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC~BK 15950 PG 805 I' LEGAL DESCRIPTION -1100 CLEVELAND STREET Parcel 15-29-15-03060-001-0010 Lots 1 thru 14 inclusive, Lot 15, less the East 23.0 feet thereof, all in Block "A", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. LESS the West 10.0 feet of said Lot 1, deeded to the City of Clearwater for right-of- way purposes. Lots 1, 2, 10 and that part of Lots 3 and 4 which lie West of a Southerly extension of the Westerly line of the Easterly 23.0 feet of Lot 15, Block "A", (of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida), LESS the East 23.0 feet of said Lot 4 thereof, all in H. A. KILGORE'S SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 58, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Vacated portion of NE Cleveland Street (66.0 feet width) described as follows: That portion lying between Blocks "A" and "B" of BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: From the most Easterly comer of Lot 25, of said Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, said corner being on the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street, run thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right-of--way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along saidright-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, 41.58 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run South 84°10'09" East, 99.84 f~;;t to a point on the Southeasterly right-0f-- way line of said NE Cleveland Street; thence run South 58°27'00" West, along said Southeasterly right-of--way line, 33.81 feet; thence continue, along said Southeasterly right-of- way line, South 51°00'30" West, 310.43 feet to a point, said point being on the Southerly extension of a line lying 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown adjacent to Block "B" of said BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION; thence run North 00°12'00" West, along a line 10.0 feet East of a parallel to the Southerly extension of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue as shown on said Block "B", 84.68 feet to the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence run North 51°00'30" East, along said right-of--way line, 220.09 feet to the Point of Beginning. AND Parce115-29-15-03060-002-0090 Lots 9 thru 25 inclusive and that part of Lot 50, described as follows: Begin at the most Southerly comer of said Lot 50 for the Point of Beginning; thence run North, along the West line of said Lot 50, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9; thence East along the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 9 to the Northerly line of said Lot 24; thence Southwesterly, along the Northerly line of said Lot 24, to the Point of Beginning, all in Block "B", BASSEDENA SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 26, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS the following described tract: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Lot 11 for the Point of Beginning; thence run South 42°19'40" East, 14.9? feet; thence South 84°10'09" East, 248.03 feet to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 25, said corner being on the Northwesterly right-of- way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 58°27'00" West, along said Northwesterly right- of-way line, 50.0 feet; thence continue along said right-of--way line, South 51°00'30" West, PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC~BK 15950 PG 806 • - ~ 41.58 feet; thence North 84°10'09" West, 152.60 feet; thence South 47°48'56" West, 26.76 feet to a point 10.0 feet East of the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue; thence South 00°12'00" East, along a line of 10.0 feet East of the parallel to the East line of Greenwood Avenue, 135.01 feet to the Northwesterly right-of--way line of NE Cleveland Street; thence South 51°00'30" West, along the Northwesterly right-of--way of NE Cleveland Street, 12.83 feet to the East right-of--way line of Greenwood Avenue, 235.10 feet to the Point of Beginning. (For right- of-way purposes for realignment of NE Cleveland Street and for widening of Greenwood Avenue.) STATE OFFLORIDA - PINELLAS CAUNTY rt `~i r copy aseecorded In thetoffic~ae9eco9ds of true *~~•• •''••.: *-i Pinellas Col~nty. ~ 20,~ ~^ <~ This~ayof KENB KE i~,~, '; ~ . '~: Clerk of Circuit urt By• Deputy Clerk f ' ..~ • CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, July 18, 2006, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Svc, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a new single family residence in the Medium Density Residential district, as a residential infill project, and includes: 1) A reduction in the minimum lot area from 5,000 sq ft to 4,143 sq ft; and 2) A front (south) setback reduction from 25 ft to 13 ft, per Sec. 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 701 Pennsylvania Ave, Pine Crest Sub, Blk 7. Lot 11 less E 60 ft. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-02003 2. Clearwater Centre, LLC (Guy 8~ Susan Bonneville, Sebastian 8~ Elizabeth Dorner, Anthony Dorner) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a mixed-use development consisting of 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 sq ft of non-residential floor area within the Downtown (D) District with an increase to the building ht of an additional 15 ft (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), and a 26-space off-street parking lot within the Commercial (C) District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Secs. 2-704.C and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Terrrtination of Status of Nonconformity for ht (148 ft to roof deck where a maximum of 75 ft would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec. 6-109 of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (Attached Dwellings, Office and Retail Sales and Services)] at 1100 Cleveland St. and 103 Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave., Bassadena, Blk A, Lots 1-14-aril----° part of Lot 15,_Blk_B,_Lots_9-11 and Lots 14-25. Assigned Planner: Rob_ert_ G. Tefft, lanrier III. FLD2006-04023 3. Gulf to Bav Holdings, LLC (Chris Tsavoussis) are requesting Flexible Development approval in the Commercial (C) District for a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd from 25 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer on the north property line from 15 ft to 5.8 ft as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Existing Drive-Through Restaurant) at 2551 Gulf to Bav Blvd., The Regency Sub, Lot 1. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006-04021 4. Trust No 801 c/o Lance Reilmann, THE (Sal Maggio) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a detached dwelling in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a reduction to the front (west along Myrtle Ave.) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached dwelling) at 801 Howard St., Belmont Sub 2~d Add, Blk J, Lot 1 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-04020 ~1 ~ 5. James R. Barge, Kelly Wilken, Betty Salimi, Marrianne F. Meichenbaum Living Trust 8~ Marianne F. Meichenbaum TRE, Marvin 8~ Clara Zoromski, Brian 8~ Nadine Thomas, Dan L. Vo, Michael & Dawn Galasso, Craig A. & Cathy L. Junkins are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit rear deck/patio additions to existing detached dwellings with a reduction to the rear setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to deck/patio) and a reduction to the side setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to deck/patio), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-504.F. (Proposed Use: Rear deck/patio additions to existing detached dwellings) at 138, 175, 214, 215 and 226 Sand Kev Estates Dr. and 1608, 1617, 1631 and 1635 Sand Kev Estates Ct., The Moorings of Sand Key, Lots 1, 18, 20, 24, 35, 37, 42, 45 8~ 64. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-04018 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Parry status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/06/06 FLD2006-04023. 63 ANDRUS, DONNA ~ALOW, RONALD D THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # PH-E PO BOX 279 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0279 BODDY, TERRA A BRICOUR DEV INC 1132 GROVE ST 1522 SAND HOLLOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4823 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4641 CHITRANEE-A INC 1003 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1019 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Sondra Kerr, President P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, FL 33758 CLEARWATER VILLAGE LC MC CADDEN LLP 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER POWER SQUADRON 1000 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4514 DEEULIO, MARK GONZALES, LEON 1650 WINDSOR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - DOWNTOWN LOFTS HOMEOWNER'S DRESSER, CHRISTOPHER J ASS 702 GROVE ST 423 CLEVELAND ST DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5017 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4005 FAREWELL, RALPH B FAREWELL, CAROLYN A 1128 NE CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4812 FORESTER, SALLY BOND, WAYNE THE 613 S HANCOCK ST PHILADELPHIA PA 19147 GREEN, DONNA M THE PO BOX 6681 OZONA FL 34660 - 6681 FERRY, LYNN 8651 BULL CREEK RD COULTERVILLE CA 95311 - 9521 FRIEDMAN, STEVE FRIEDMAN, MARSHA 1442 QUAIL DR - 2404 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9272 GUY, ALBERT L GUY, LINDA M 1689 OAK PL CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1351 •ERNAL, HANSA ` h ~ MESA-SAVAGE, SHANE 1145 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4818 CHESNUT, TOM T CHESNUT, ARTHUR C SR & JEANNE 4411 MELROSE AVE TAMPA FL 33629 - 5523 CLEARWATER CENTRE LLC 307 SCOTTS CT BOLINBROOK IL 60440 - 1135 CLEARWATER PRINTING INC 1002 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4529 DESPER, IRA A TRUST 613 S HANCOCK ST PHILADELPHIA PA 19147 - 2404 ENTEL RADIOLOGY ASSOC MD PA PENSION PLAN & TRUST 1003 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1019 FIRST NATL BANK NAPLES 2150 GOODLETTE RD N STE 800 NAPLES FL 34102 - 4812 GREATER CLW CHAMBER COMM INC 1130 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4841 HARN-WAGNER, NANCY 1108 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4823 HARTLEY, MICHAEL D HENEGAR, DENNIS H HENNESSY, PAMELA F 10733 59TH AVE HENEGAR, JACQUELINE 1133 DREW ST SEMINOLE FL 33738 - 6074 1115 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4818 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4893 . ~. w HERRON, DANIEL WHITNEY LEAHON, LAWRENCE P THE LIGGINS, MARTHA A THE 1122 GROVE ST 2552 HIGHLAND AVE PO BOX 10787 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4823 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8923 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 0787 MELD, ALFREDO MERRIWEATHER, BENNIE J MELD, CONCEICAO MELVIN, WALTER O KIGHT, MABLE F 6 PANORAMA CRES 1109 GROVE ST 50 HAMLIN RD BRAMPTON ON L5G 3T9 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4824 BUFFALO NY 14208 - 1536 CANADA MORROW, SCOTT L P B M ENTERPRISES Pierce 100 Condo Association 1141 DREW ST 1170 NE CLEVELAND ST Terry Sue CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4818 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4836 100 Pierce Street Clearwater, FL 33756 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE QUALITY APPL SERV PIN INC REMBERT, JAMES C 419 EASTSHORE DR 1155 NE CLEVELAND ST 1400 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4815 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3425 RICARTE, ERICA H SAOULIS, CHRISTOPHER H SCHOEPPE, MATTHEW CO 1112 GROVE ST 933 LAURA ST 6625 MEADOWBROOK LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4823 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4545 NEW PRT RCHY FL 34653 - 4821 SHALES INC SOCIETY ST VINCENT DE PAUL COU SOUTHWIND MGMT SERVICES INC 1115 CLEVELAND ST 1015 CLEVELAND ST PO BOX 10293 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4808 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4515 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 8293 SUNNE & LOCKE SYDON INC TROCKELS, FRITZ W 1151 NE CLEVELAND ST 1010 CLEVELAND ST TROCKELS, KAREN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4815 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4514 1941 SEVER DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4713 UNDERWOOD, RAYMOND UNGER, JOHN L WARD, DEBRA K 519 MARINA AVE UNGER, LOIS 225 HILLCREST N CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5042 1007 PARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5013 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5742 WILDER, FRED J WITTER, WILLIAM P WONG, HARRY K GOODGAME, BETTIE W 1156 NE CLEVELAND ST WONG, SAFARI V PO BOX 1808 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4814 90 IROQUOIS TRL CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1808 PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 - 7607 WOODBURY, WALLACE WOODRUFF, DARRYL W Z J L PROPERTIES CO 1138 GROVE ST WOODRUFF, JOAN 2551 INDIGO DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4823 1415 MAPLE ST DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6520 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5031 Zayac, Keith E., P.E., R.L.A 701 Enterprise Rd E Safety Harbor, FL 34695 • ~'~-T Ll N~ .... `., . O s • ~-a ~arwa ~r U Fax Cover Sheet City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4865 To: Keith Zayac Fax: 793-9855 Case FLD2006-04023 -1100 Cleveland Street - Clearwater Centre LLC From: Sherry Watkins, Planning De artment Date: May 30, 2006 Sub' ect: DRC Meeting Thursday, June 1-2006 Message: YOUR DRC -DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING IS AT 10:30 AM @ 100 S MYRTLE AVE ROOM 216. PLEASE CONTRACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS @ 727-562-4582. THANK YOU . ~ ~ May. 30 2006 11:37AM • YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 May. 30 11:36AM 00'59 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #84. THEN SELECT DFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). • • r+, 1~ ~ ~ Check list for CDB Agenda ~ Application sent to City Clerks Office FLD2006-04023 //~® Cleveland Street INITIALS V Application Form Parcel ID ~ S Y Letter of Authorization Survey or Legal Description ,~ Copt/ of 400 scale Zoning Atlas with property outlined and 500' radius hand drawn from outside gerimter of site 2 2 M LUZ 8 Z i d f ANX / x ap s requ re or , LARGE SCALE AMENDMENTS YES or Ai6~ Sherry Watkins M ~j ~~ • ~II$ FLD2006-04023 1100 CLEVELAND ST Date Received: 04/27/2006 CLEARWATER CENTER ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE : CBD ATLAS PAGE: 287A PLANNER OF RECORD: R T CLW CoverSheet /1~0 ~~®~~ •_ - 2778 „ • 27 A ~~ i, b~Q~ R >os7 is z4 ~l,j<2 6 2 3 1 g y _ 2 88 ~ _ S .o ~ Y 8 >i $~ : t" F '° eo. " e ~~F ~~~ e] ~ ~ ~L~ {~ .R CITY OF CLEARWATER R e es ~ m / ~ ~ es ~~ ~i PQIEILAS~CO~IRTY FUD9IDA nr.e~8s ..r• vn R DREW ~ ~~`1 / ~ PREPARED Br 6 5 e 3 2 t £ ! a. ego I~ }y! p ~ PUBLIC NORHS AD1dINISTRATION ~I~ 22/01 ,dd IJd 6 ~ 7 ql n" i 5 " ~~ ~'•¢ 2 ~ ~• 1M ~ SII nw ~ ~ • ~ . ~ R , ' ! A~~~9~~~ [~~ 100 5. Mpllt EA.e.INCkorwOlx, fl J]756 t t l z z 2 I~ ree u n ~ ~ t z2/oz `~ Pn: Iets)ss2-a7sB, Poc feu)szs-/75s 7 8 9 0 1 2 < g ,eo rr ntl r B rlr a S m 7$ yp 9 10 1! ;~ 0: //www.<leprwclx-O.COm/<ngnex/ % s H G E 2 , to y /H I0p g S ~"6" ~ R lu ~"• 9r ~ Iro DIrCtOMx: •• R iD„ fx rtd n " Pudb inidmollon dolo Id iyrnl•na0 Dy IM LYIy OI CleprwOler D oe STREET R ~ " ~ '~ I /q I Pudle Morde bmFlrtralbn/Englnwxlnq, Ond mun Da oe<eDte4 6 5 a 3 2 1 12 q ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ` , ~' it r,r/0 ono uud Dy Inc rld0llnt wlln Inc underdondMO toot Inc dalp 22 2 ! ~ r ~ w ~ r rteelre0 wr]f COIIeciM ror Ine purpeee of developFq o gOOnlc I B 9 1 I/ -,3 13 U /05 < 2 5 1 , S foy °, Irodlrvelure Imenlxy. M ]uen, Me Clly Of Clear•rolx PWA/E t • " ~ 1 I mole[ no leananltee, aprearsd or Implle0. con<arnlnq IM 1 a rol ~ aeeurocy. eomdelenese. retlaDVl,y. x euI1pDONy of Isle doto rx u 15 t6 ~ SARAH • „ ; any emlr Dorurmor ya. Pyrmermpre, me city or nee..mlx 22/06 g 5 e 7 CM1I eN to r ~ " w w>, w r PwA/E mwme• ne Ibeuny wnat>oew o..adOtM .I,n Ine u ~ = Q 1 ~ 6 t~ ~ e t 9 ~ DROVE • STREET I ~ n R , ~ 3$ miwu pr wcn dp1o. 'l R LAURA 8 8 S1RFFr 8 w r R Tnl, Auor page I, ,ye~c' le Dxloer mengee. s ~ 4 Ed ardmotlon a°oul lolly ,edsone Dleme coil PWA/E a n} z t ~ McMULLEN a g e 7~ z~~ n 1 9 7 e to ti tee ..,n oyr wle >,tl. = SUB© ,. .3,2,3 z , " " .. N ro 7 2 1 5 6 7 8 9 f f t0 7 6 S e 3 2 1 11I 14 1p ~ 1-41 = N~ e s a g a 5 v 7 e a to '~ ~ a a a $ "$ $~ R 6a ~ tl ~ •e " ~ ,t to R w I R LEVEIAND •,•' ` ~ t y 8 R R E 0 100 200 400 600 D S.a. 60 ~>; : B .. F i a E o ~ ~ ~ >o STRET 8 R I$ } 2n 1 ~I 1 1 a 5 8 7 B t 2 3 4 S 6 9 •0 r D..I - ~ E ~ ~ Tel (i e t f 1 2 3 e g ~ A ~~ SCnLE: t' = a0D' e O ~ ~ 21 /02 41 ~ Ita 1 18 rwl to 19 20 21 22 2 I r B 9 10 to 75 1a 13 12 11 10 9 I 19 18 17 18 13 1a 13 12 11 1-41 t 1 '° Q H - 0 1e ° a 13D'E e e e - 3 ~ a rp ,s 7 to 2,/03 27 2s LEGEND: o "a „ R I R PAaI( ~ to e~ 2t/o4 f e 29 G 3D 3, ,e I Cfl Iii. ( 21/09 8 1p ~ ~ 21/06 ~ 3 3a ~ 33 32i I ~ ~ E ~ ® ~ fi - / t~ I2 3 e 9 O BLOCK NUMBER ED "I a 5 •o a 6 7 ~ 9 t0 tt s 5 O 1f 1 21/05 rA 36 37 B 34 fJ ~ ~~~ ,Oa T ~ E Ipd t6 le 1e 5 t - ~ 30 ~ 1234 LOT ApDRE55 e• z ~ me 3 ..-- . 7 6 I< 2 ., t7 ,e is 1 ~ ,oD / 2 » 1 2 mN. 3 7 e 5 2 t ds t B W ig" I 1 21 7j < rp> 3 18 - S Di 2 > , ~ CITY LIMITS LINE ~ to ~ 3 le a 7 I ~ ~ I , ~ . ~ yAl p - - n 'a g R AERCE 4 ~, R vo0o ee PIE CE ST I r?~>:::;1 SHADED AREA -PROPERTY ~ STREET g g ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 , ~ ~ ~~'"'"~ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS 1 u n 19 zt Jm I 1O0 loa " $' S 20 zs A1z2 m e ° to ii ®ts u a ~ } a s ~ f,°;D 7 2t 6 2t l01 2a 23 Z & b 4- 2 < g 10 12 to to to so ~ < ~, ' ~ AGREEMENT TO ANNE% ~ 2 7 22 _ t] p-o I 23 a 13 e1+, 'l0 2B ili w. xn-n I > n ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY 0 6I 7 a ° 9 _ fD 27 3 iii FI ~ Ita t i tae I r> , " ~ 10- 25 r1 ` 90 4t N tob Qv 26 'ro I 8] ~ ~ 2 MDR ZONING DESIGNATION 4r ror D 2 1 aoo / ~ 8 8 FRANNUN STREETS zs "e - tt 3 ® a mi ~ Q ® ~y ~ ZONE LINE } a 5 I rrr 13 I Ze ud t3 29 Q drr„w 2 bA no Z.r S 01 3 u f1 29 Oa tt 29 q 2 S 1 d11 ~ I ~ col r r ~j V 13 a 30 l°e 1g JO mo n I 4 an It t0 9 m eo Y RE]arNc ~B 7 6 t '~ SE -n ® , g t2 5 3 a 5 4 3 2 t m 3]D] 10/D>/D] j I y14 6 VAC ]/,>/Df • 2D ~g 8 A U ! m Sad t0/O>/93 71 R i $~Y "$ t 11 Ol 1 11 ID/ Z , 1~ w ~' • /11 / ] ®sse, oe/]Re ~ ) 12 2 ~ ~ t] e E R I 8 OOlli1T r'A. 13 ^ TY' IOD 1e F F 7 ~ ~•^ ny t,n S t ~ e' ry I - t3 or 17 13 a !L` EC 23 2a 2g ~ e ~ ~ I H i~ @ SS5 . H .~`2} P° t a u m. u u d ~ ++ to 9 , t4 /5 16 n 1e ~ F 0 1 ~ ° D or t8 19 20 2t 22 S } 4 S 19 COe~ 5 r-0 S t5 I/d S 13 I9 , 8 WAD s 1e s t6 .m Irr ' g o e 7 6 s e " o Ipe O LOT NUMBER - R.H. 6 a-w `/ 2 7 ~ tN t3 " 13 t2 tt ,0 9 1 ' 2 PADGETT'S SUB. HS-27 3 I 7 4• t 7 7 n ie 3 >y 9 0 ~ u ~., e 7 s ~ .0d s to a a is D R IW T ~ S a e 7 3 ~ •o ~" 1 • 8 eo 9 19 e,V ~ 19 1 ~ • t:~ A2 12 ~- ® q R _S?t.E Ttf_NUr a ___ 10s r 20e R B ~ e s to t1 ,3 a e! 17 e s ~~a 3 ~ ]o REVISED: __ 'y„j~'" - .,,,„ ~ 10/26/99. ep. A ~ "" " „ De ~ ~ ~ e"n ZONING ATLAS ~ 2958 -.$, ~ 31/11 31 to / ~ • 296A NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 2 8 7 A 2968 ~ i5 - 29 S - 15 E ~f !, ~` jI' `~ ~ ' ' _. _ _ ;~tJf~T To Ct~ ~~Cr~~~ Coo I,C,'S,h,~~,~~~-I ~ `N-D~fi~ t~Co~Gh, 1 i~'f.1~U5~E '(?x~rIJ~1 ~" ~4 ~~~±G~ t° ~1d~1Ar.~4~.,.1~ ~.'.~~~? (.~ ~cn.._,~_G~ 1fi TAP d.S M~~~ ~ -~' ~~' ~ .j ,~""' 1lk`< ~~! ~6C~ lI.U2rt/~iS_L ~ ~t!!t~.I~~A` ~"~$ ~ , tvrk~~- is wr~t'u-r{ 1 `fta-F~ ~_ _ - , ~~l? ~~S,~IlnauM .~ 1~11•`j~ ~ ~7Sk "n~S Y~/5• 'L~_'s~ facr~ (P To "F+~-~ R~ Y/-6,t-'~ G~ "Cil~ t!~,.dPy~~?{ ~~~1Get1.-~ 1'a '-'N~ EF8T~ L~-r~~" aF ~a~nr~i.K '~ I , ~~'~= ~' T-E/1`-~ faCGt1PA~~ ~pl,+~uS ~~`~ t7tr~ta5int ~ E~o46}aa Lb'-~ ~p ~~~ -~CFt> -b6t.0 G'ar-1PU~~ ~~tltta4- `t1~ ASb`!~ '~~~EtiIG-~r~ c~-e~"ro~.. - -a !~ a~ ~~ 2!-18 ~ ~,o - ~4,y ~ t?v. ~'~ r~.,J, ' ~,o~' raoiJ -~,c-~ , o-sAt~ 2'~~ aoo'~ '2Cfp1_L_~1,~. y~/h TO'1'A~ ----~ I _~ ~ ~~ ~M Pte- -I ~,~. ~ RY~- ~'-~'- . ,~.~° ~'~~ i..iou- ls~ ~~E 5$0•'7` ~ ~.tat.~ -2P:~ '+~•~~. _ --~e_ '~~, 41'f ,21'~ ~,l-¢~S f~Lotw Qptl,.. '' ~ ~ ! - 1f2.u15.R~ I .~(R~ ~ ~' Z2, vi I ~ . 2 ~ ~' ~ ~'~or=~Sr~.L 1 s ~ o ~G '~~9t3 , ~' l~ s5 1 - ~ o, -~ ~ i~ Nom. , ~J~z~~~-~ ~~ 38,a~1 ,~'f ~~ ~b•-1-.Pa~L + Nr3'~(a~' ~~ `S w,,rt~~ - ~~~~ ~z~,ga1 ~~ _~- __ _ _ I ~. ~:_ t -~ n ~6.. a ,~a~ ;~; ;~; .w)~1. .. ~~j . '~'~~ ~r ~~ C ITS' OF C LEA~'.WATE R . ~ ~ , ~` PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OI=ru;l=. BOx 4748, G.I:nxwnrl:x, Fl.oxlr)n 33758-4748 Mu~icrnnl. Srxvlcls 13uu,nluc, 100 Solrrrl Mvx'rl.r: l~VliyUE, CLenliWarl~:x, Fl,oxlnn 33750 '1'I:LI~:hno~l: (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) jC2-4RC5 I,o~'(; Rnh~cr•, Plnhrvl~c 1)I:VI:I.OI'MI:N'1' IZI:VII:W July 20, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac Keith Zayac & Associates 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: FLD2006-04023 (1100 Cleveland Street and 103 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue) Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 18, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit amixed-use development consisting of 88 attached dwellings and 21,498 square feet of non-residential floor area within the Downtown (D) District with an increase to the building height of an additional 15 feet (as measured from roof deck to mean roof line), and a 26-space Off-Street Parking Lot within the Commercial (C) District with a deviation to the south (front) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet, to the west (front) setback from 25 feet to 9.19 feet, to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet, and to the east (side) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-704.0 and 2-903.0 of the Community Development Code; and a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for height (148 feet to roof deck where a maximum of 75 feet would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the subject properties total 2.48 acres and are located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and the northeast corner of NE Cleveland Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue; 2. That the northernmost property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the southernmost property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as both parcels are located within. the Town Lake Residential character district; 5. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 6. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. I r:~,~~ I lucu:~i:u, ~.\i:wnr ~uiia' lhmnn', Cui ~c.iiau:>ncra; I Ic>1-r I I:~>ni:rus, Cc~i'u:n.~n[~ncr,r. ISn.i.Jc>:~tiu~, (:ni;~cai.~ir:wcrr ® (::~ri.e~ n. I'rrersr~. Cc~rnc.n.~rn.wuu; ,.I;c >i ,ni. I?•~ci'i ~ ~i ~ii:~-r n.~i ~ r\rnr,~l:cnvi: r\c:ru ~~ I?,~In.(» i:x" .,, ~_ .~ fit ~ ~ _.4 ~.. ~ ~~ S Corclusc;, js of Law: 1. That the proposed use of 14 attached dwellings and 20,918 square feet ofnon-residential floor_,area from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the C1Earw~t~ Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Town Lake Residential character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-704 and 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-704.I and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions must be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Traffic Engineering conditions must be addressed; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas County between all parcels involved in the application (15-29-15-03060-001-0010 and 15-29-15-03060-002-0090) must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a notation must be provided on the site plan stating that all existing and proposed on-site utility facilities will be placed underground; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a payment of $127,462.69 must be made to the Environmental Division for purposes of the Downtown Stormwater Service District; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a certified Arborist must ensure that the proposed Swale will not impact the critical root zones of the trees as set forth on the tree preservation plan; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a certified Arborist must ensure that the canopy of the existing Oak tree located at the easternmost end of the property will not be adversely impacted by the proposed building; 8. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all streetscaping along C1eveIand Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue must installed to the satisfaction of Staff; 9. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the PSTA bus shelter proposed with the streetscape improvements will need to be designed to be consistent with the Design Guidelines; 10. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all Transportation Impact Fees must be paid; 11. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, must be placed underground; 12. That the non-residential uses proposed to be located on-site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 13. That the non-residential uses along Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue are limited to neighborhood scale uses; 14. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 15. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 16. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; ., ac ~, f •.F ~: P'. ..~ ~ « ,'~~~ 17.,That ~:~,y/ai future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: ` ~~ (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 18. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval ~ (by July 18, 2007); and ~ 19. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of a Flexible Development approval (by July 18, 2007). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via a-mail at robert.tef t~cr,myclearn~ater.com. Sincerely, , Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director cc: File S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslCleveland Street 1100 Clearwater Centre (D and C) ApprovedlCleveland Street 1100 -Development Order 07-18-06.doc