Loading...
FLD2005-06054~l~ t Planning Department ~ 100 South MyNe Avenue ~,~ ~~ Clearwater, Florida 33756 • ;~,y-~,~:.~~ ~ •;, . ~.._~-~ Telephone: 727-562-4567 ~,~ ~ ~^~.~---~~~ Fax: 727-562-4865 ~~~ CASE #: __ _______._. DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ ATLAS PAGE #: ______ ZONING DISTRICT: _ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ___ ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL 51GNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including NORTH: - _ 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SOUTH: _ WEST: ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~__ EAST: _ _ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEZIELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/20.04) ---PLEASE TYPE OR PR.TNT- ~y A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY-OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME u~ _ MAILING ADDRESSl~~ :Si~p~t, .J Y~- ~i'l_E~/„L~ (GL[i r~,_ ~~.__ ~,. PHONE NUMBER: ~ 7 ' ~~L --~~~ ~ FAX NUMBER: ~_`1 '" 'Sf "~ /P + Z~O~ PROPERTY OWNER(S): '~~]~ ~ ,~Dr40. -CC~ __ _ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provid-e original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME:~j~,~~~{1~~~ -FG'~ r~/LK7 ~~~E/Lj~~'~ !~y_~r.t~ MAILING ADDRESS~C~.~~1~~ ~„S~_~~~t] ~ __~ ~,L! PHONE NUMBER:~~ '7`7`~ ~n le % _ FAX NUMBER: 7.z 7 'Y y~ ~)~' CELL NUMBER: ~_j__~~__Q~~ _ E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~~4~--u`'=~~It/n l~.S'P/Lle~ Cl . Lfl~/?" B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (IlNFORMATION: (Code/SJection 4202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site~~U ~; L~ f ~lZ~~~.s 1` = r fl 1 ~ ~~ ' ~~ 1 i ,i 1-~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ Y ~~C! ~~ /tiff lL'~/VL`T ~~ s ~ I (if no[ listed here please note the location o this document in the submittal) j PARCEL NUMBER: 1J - Z~-_.L~S-- ~_~ / a ~ ~~~ Q ~ ~~~~ ~ I PARCEL SIZE: i ~ _ ~ ~sr A_.. ~ . ~~"~~-""""-"""f ,. ~. , a :1a~1 (acres, square feet) f~, ~ ~ ~j / l- „ i ; (~);_ (~.; c .:,~ .,~.:, ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S)~~~~~r c~.SCrL1L~!"1C~ /LO /`' 9e-~._LtE~~-.~--~~L_ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) i ~'i- I`'IZ~. ~~~ LL-~_~1~~g- ~?r Vic- j.1~~/CC~<,f~~~ -- -- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):~~- vLL CGLC_~~~!y1~1_~/~ __ _ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) A ; -> -- --- --------- - - --~ t i i ~ i f ti l' Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Cornprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES __ NO ,,~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C./PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) id SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D/ WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ~" Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ' 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including. visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours-of. aperation'im~adis;~'}, on adjacent ro ernes. y" {{ `' kk tV= t';. t ` :1 ~~ ;y ~ `~ Ct3U:l i t -- ~..._. ~, ._...,_.~_.~.I ,t~~,~ !.ne a.. C3~~rovide complete responses to the ten.(10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail; 1, The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. - ------ --- ---- -~'- o Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. /`-~ 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vidnity of the parcel proposed for development. , ~E ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ __ 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. t~ , li 'i ~, i~ '~ ti Ct ~ 1! l)F C:1 rq~,iiitC~(3 S dCS~ Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. ~. E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. / If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to whythe site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the ity manual. __ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^~\(~SEOPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included Stonnwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided. CAU-JON - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HA5 BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Code Section 4-202.A) p~IGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; `I~L TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, ', including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the exisfing trees; L9' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior _ to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be iri accordance with accepted traffic engineering pngciples. The endings ofthe study yvill be used in determinino whet)ier or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; - ~~RADING PLAN, as applicable; C~1P PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~ r11 ~ ~ (~'~ % ~ ~; r ` ~~ ~ I , SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ---- ... _ .....,_.._... i - _ All dimensions; ! ~ I _ North arrow; n JF~ A ~ ZaD5 I ~ i ' ~ I __ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 5D feet), and date prepared; : ~ ~. ~ Location map; _ ` t . __ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _.._...._.a...~.... J _,..,- r ~~ , `"`"'"""'"""""' ,, roc ~ ~ ' =' - Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; - ~ • ~ ~ ' 'P `" ( - Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ' ' -~ ~' ~ •' • =~ __ All required setbacks; __ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; ' __ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specime n trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife n habitats, etc; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Jy Location of all public and private easements; t ~ __ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ,,, Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater __ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _~ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; __ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures: and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in wririen/tabular form: ___ Land area in square feet and acres; _ _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utiliiy easement; _ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and __ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11}and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; __ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; >~` Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); u Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of alt trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H./LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) @' LANDSCAPE PLAN: __ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; __ Proposed and required parking spaces; ___ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; __ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated 6y a key relating to the plant schedule; __ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ~_ Irtigation notes. V' REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11) {color rendering 'rf possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval}; ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive,__ Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will n i (be met. ~ I t j u __ ~, [~~ 5~~ Q ~ ~~~~ ~u r ~--_ - pt,.F,~~c . Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202,A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part - /of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. lX BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of alt buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; EDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/s X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. ' Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee {727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to fhis requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic lmpact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway _l\egs and each turning movement at all intersections ident~ed in the Scoping Meeting. {~~_ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS iN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Adminisfration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersi ed, acknowledge that all representations made in this applica' n ar true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and autho Ci representatives to visit and photograph the property descri ed in is application. of perly o er or repre &u _ - - - ~ \ ~`~' °~, DOREEN A. WiLLiAI~ ~, ~c MY COMMISSION # DD 15580'L of Ao t-8003NOTAriY R Notary Service & banding, lnc. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ;jvvetn'~tq and subscribed beforee ~e this ~ day of CC E f~.D. 20_ to me and/or by G ' who is personally known has produced _~ as fdpntificatinn_ commission expires: l Page 6 of 7 -flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City'of Clearwat"e~ ,11129,'2004 11:25 727446803 NORTHSIDE ENG SUCS~ PAGE 02%02 CITY OF C~EAR~,A.TER AFFIDA~TIT TOi AUTHOHXZE AGENT ~` PT,.ANNING & DE~ELOpMENT SE~,VTCES AD1dJIII4iIST12ATION tvItJN1CJPAL SEP.ViGES BIiII.DiNG, )OO SOUTH I~fYRTi.E Ab'ENUE. ?.°" T'LO(]R PE~IOAIE {727)-562-4869 rAX (?27j 587.-4576. (Addre4.e or General LoeaNon) (Nawrn of request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have} appointed and (doesldo} appoint 5~ ~ LAP 5. That (Ilwe), the undersigned authorit}r, hereby certify that the foregoing r true and correct. C property Property owner S7A'TE OF FLt7RfDA, COUNTY OF PINtEt.I.AS ore a the landersig etl, an officer duty eornmissloned 1 ~, parsonapyappoered ~lamwS deposms antl says that helshe fully understands the conto My Comrtlisslon E=acplrQS: S; epplkd0on forYn9ldeveloRnt6nt revlow/Aflldav(t to Authprl7o Agent laws of the Stets of Florida, on this ~~ d~1y of K' aving be9n first duly sworn to atfi~avl~et he/sh IY ~P r otary f'ubtic ;~:~:'e~~•, Linda S. Corso '~?'' ~'; =,; ,- MY COMMISSION # DD354601 EXPIRES ,~o September 13,2008 ~~•',',eof~,o?,~ 60NDEL!THRUTPG~=~ININSURANCEINC `~~ ~~~~~~C~71~ ~ ~ ~~ ~-~, ~ ; 1, That (I am/we are} the owner{5} and r®cord title holders} of the follovding described property: 2, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: 4, That this affidavit has been ex®cuted to induce the City of Clearwater, i=ivrida to can4ider and act vn the above described property; ~11f18.2004 11:07 72744F~sO3~ NORTHOIUE EhJG' CS~ /~ ~7 LETTER 8F AUTHORI7.ATION This letter will sense as authorization for Hough ChovaEe with Northgide E~giireering Services, fne. to act as an agent for ~, 5 - ~5~ ~D --- and to execute any and all documents related to securipg permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 11 ~, ~ ~ e:l,) S'~ r~ e~ ,Tying within ~ v~ ll 6~ 5 County, State of ~~ ~ ~'t~ c~c. ~_• Signature of Pro Print Name of Property Qwner PAGE O2fO2 Address of Property t)wner Telephone Number City/StatelZip Code State of ~~1h p The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this ~ ~ H day n ~°°`~ TNaMas Q~yP , ~s County of 1' 1-~u-~S of a~~~ ~~ by .! wha is personally known to me orwho has produced ~~- ~~~ Vfr~. is as identification and who did (did not) take an oath, ~nYPi?~; MargaretEReeves *~ .:: MY COMMISSION # DD344640 D(PIRES ~~ Auguste, 2 ~~ Fl;,.~ BONDEDTHRUiROYFAINI~~ Notary Public (Signat ) Commission ~ (SEAL ABOVE 1 -~~1 ~~'~ R'~y~Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) ~~ s' ~,~•~ Q ~ e~~5 ~ . ', , .. ~.. ~.... i f^ ._ 1 ~ . i 1 ti FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1774 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.5' to pavement, 15.5' to building, (south) from 25' to 4.2' to pavement, side setback (east) from 10' to 5' to pavement and 9' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. A reduction to parking from 38 required spaces to 28 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The development will be in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The existing building which is to remain is a one-story building which is similar to surround properties. There is no bulk to the building and the coverage, density and character are all in likeness to surrounding parcels. If the proposed development was not on three fronts, the project could have probably been designed with no deviations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder adjacent land and building nor impair values. The existing building will be remaining, an addition being added to the building and site improvements being made. This will only increase surrounding values. 3. No health or safety issues arise from this project. More than anything, it has increased the safety. Existing trailers which were used for storage are being removed and site improvements are being made. 4. No additional traffic will be at the site. All ingress and egresses are being maintained except for upgrades. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character. All the surrounding parcels are retail, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. 6. No adverse effects will be made to adjacent properties. The north of the property abuts residential, but we will be placing a 6' landscaped fence along the property line as to further buffer the residences. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT The property is impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the property being surrounded by three streets, with 25' setbacks, this is impossible. There would be no room for building. ~;, ~ ~L~ 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease.. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. Other suitable sites may be available throughout the City of Clearwater, but the owner has been at this location for approximately IO years and only wished to expand his operation. so other sites were not practical. 6. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 7. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings,.this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 8. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. 9. Off-street parking is being provided for the site. By code, 4-5 spaces are required for retail. By these calculations, we should be required to have 38 parking spaces our site is short 10 parking spaces. Included in our application is a parking demand study. Prior to the applicant redeveloping; he had approximately 10 -15 parking spaces for 7,925 square feet of building. There has never been a day when all parking spaces were occupied. The addition to the property is 1,663 square feet of space, 1,100 square feet for storage. Even though we are shy 10 spaces, we still do not feel on- street parking will take place. The parking calculations were based on 4 spaces per 1,000 squaze feet. No consideration was taken into account for the storage square footage. This would not account for an additional need of parking spaces. The only staff accessing storage would be for the ones already accounted for under actual retail space. 10. N/A ! ~ ;, i ~ ~ ' .f ~ Ll ~~...~.... --._.__--_ _ f , , t . ' C~:~ C" s ..: ~' ~ . Calculations using the most.Used Trip Generation Rates from the 6th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report Descrij~tionl{7E•CQde' - ~ Un is ~:~~ Expe'a~gd 8~p~pi~ed`„ ~~ PM Reak ~=' PM In "; = -~M ~~Y ,; :... ;,... r Units Dall 7rlps;` Tri s,'Total ..:. Truck Terminal 030 Acres General Li ht Industrial 110 TSF Gross Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross Not Available Sin Ie Famil Homes 210 DU A artments 220 DU Mobile Home Park 240 DU Retirement Communit 250 DU Not Available All Suites Hotel 311 Occ.Room _ Motel 320 Occ.Room Marina 420 Berths Health Club 493 TSF Gross <-. Not Available Church 560 TSF Gross - Da care Center 565 TSF Gross - -. _ General Office 710 TSF Gross _ ___ _ _ Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross _ Buildin Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross S ecialt Retail Center 814 TSF Gross 390 25 11 14 Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Availabl Not Available Sho in Center 820 TSF Gross Quality Restaurant 831 TSF Gross Hi h Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 832 TSF Gross ___ Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 833 TSF Gross = Not Available Fast Food with Drive Thru 834 ___ TSF Gross Drive Thru Onl 835 TSF Gross I_ _ Not Available Service Station 844 _ Fuel. Position Serv.Station wl Conven.Mkt 845 Fuel Position ~ Tire Store 848 ___ Service Bas ~ Su ormarket 850 TSF Gross 1--r- Convenlen. Mkt O en 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross ___ Convenien. Mkt O eri 18 Hrs 862 TSF Gross ____ Not Available Convenien. Mkt w/Gas Pum s 853 TSF Gross.. Discount Club 861 TSF Gross ! ' Furniture Store 890 __ _ TSF Gross Walk-In bank 911 TSF Gross Drive-tn Bank 912 _ Driveln Wlndo:•.s Y:\Public\Agency Apps\FDOT\[trlpcalB.xlsjCalculations 22-Jun-05 Chainwheel Drive ~ C~ J ~tL M 1~'1 "C~ ~ j!-t' -. ~ r~ ~ t t ' L ~ sau zo ~~ iv Lu ch HourTr3ffic ' Total In Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 »»»> No calculations but studies show'Lunch Peak 146-364 two way trips 41so see a non ITE Method In tab titled "Gas and Conv.Mk" Revised 9/21/2005 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street - Chainwheel Drive NES #470 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east long North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under provisions of Section 3-1202.G. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The development will be in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The existing building which is to remain is a one-story building which is similar to surround properties. There is no bulk to the building and the coverage, density and character are all in likeness to surrounding parcels. If the proposed development was not on three fronts, the project could have probably been designed with no deviations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder adjacent land and building nor impair values. The existing building will be remaining, an addition being added to the building and site improvements being made. This will only increase surrounding values. 3. No health or safety issues arise from this project. More than anything, it has increased the safety. Existing trailers which were used for storage are being removed and site improvements are being made. 4. No additional traffic will be at the site. All ingress and egresses are being maintained except for upgrades. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character. All the surrounding parcels are retail, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. 6. No adverse effects will be made to adjacent properties. The north of the property abuts residential, but we will be placing a 6' landscaped fence along the property line as to further buffer the residences. ~C~~~M~~ COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJEC')~ ~~ ~ SEN ~ 3 2005 ,, Page 1 of 2 Revised 9/ll/2005 1. The property is impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the property being surrounded by three streets, with 25' setbacks, this is impossible. There would be no room for building. 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. Other suitable sites maybe available throughout the City of Clearwater, but the owner has been at this location for approximately 10 years and only wished to expand his operation so other sites were not practical. 6. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 7. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 8. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. 9. Off-street parking is being provided for the site. By code, 4-5 spaces are required for retail. By these calculations, we should be required to have 38 parking spaces our site is short 10 parking spaces. Included in our application is a parking demand study. Prior to the applicant redeveloping, he had approximately 10 - 15 parking spaces for 7,925 square feet of building. There has never been a day when all parking spaces were occupied. The addition to the property is 1,663 square feet of space, 1,100 square feet for storage. Even though we are shy 10 spaces, we still do not feel on- street parking will take place. The parking calculations were based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. No consideration was taken into account for the storage square footage. This would not account for an additional need of parking spaces. The only staff accessing storage would be for the ones already accounted for under actual retail space. r ~~ 10. N/A - ~-- Page 2 of 2 "_~ '~ .. t C~'~~' - - ~..:~~, - ~i- Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3} folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~ _ CASE #: ___ _ ________ DATE RECEIVED: _ ' _ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): -_ ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: _ _ _ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _ _ _ SOUTH: _ WEST: _ EAST: '~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 1z/3o/zoo4) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICA MAILING PHONE NUMBER:~~ PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~` 7_~~~ ___ FAX NUMBER: ~~_1K~ ~~Dz7 - (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) ` -1 i AGENT NAMEf~~~l/~i~~~~~tll/l(/Lf~~/'~Q~L/L~l~~~_~!t~'Z~it[~~(,~(,~t.lC~ _ ~it'CJ/C ~~~ ~tJ C . MAILINGADDRESS~~__~[-~1~~ ~C.. ~_:~~___~~.f}~l.~rtS~ ~./~~ ~G ~'37~ __ ~/~, ~y i PHONE NUMBER~:y~L_!~~~.'3~ /~ __ FAX NUMBER: ~~ 7 _~_,8rz~~ CELL NUMBER: /a 7 ~v ~Q 7~_ E-MAIL ADDRESS~'L\~~0~~~ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMJEN-T~IINFO M`ATION: (Code Section 4202.A) STREET ADDRESS of sub'ect site: / /C7 ~/L~ ~ ~2~~7~1~ .~j/~ ~ ~ -- - 1 ~ -`~ ~-~ C~- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (.~~~ 4' ~ ___~~~j~~~j~__~~__ __- (If not listed here please ote the location f his document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: ~=~~--J,~~~~G7_-~_LC~ -_ _ PARCEL SIZE: -~_~~~ ~_ / _ °?yLU!-=g~ X51-- - (acres, square feet) \ ~,/~ ~ ~ ) PROPOSED USE(S) AND 51ZE(S%F/~~Q~ IC~ .)~. ~~.L~d.L~L(,S~.L ---- (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) , ., ~ ~ r ~} DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _~~ ~_ Q~ ~~F _~~~~~~ ~ I ! t~ ~ ~`~~ ~1 ~ ~^'~'' tit .~.~.. ~ ~..«., Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g, reduction in required numb yr_of ~ar~ ng spaces, specific use, etc.) C _~_,..- ..... - -- - ----- -~~ It ! , ..... ~ .._ ., ,y i _ „ i . Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIQIJSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _~_/(if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C~PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) Td SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR 51GN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impairthe value thereof. (~~ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. .. .., ~ Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infiil 2005- City of Clearwater • ^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. - - -- ----- ----- - 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site arid the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residenfial infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the pa~rc~el`proposed for development and the City of~Cle~ajrwater as a whole. oRi~i~u,~~. Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infitl 2005- City of Clearwater • • FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.5' to pavement, (south) from 25' to 8.5 to pavement and 15.5 to building, side setback {east} from 10' to 5' to pavement and 9' to existing building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. Reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 38 spaces to 28 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIItEMENTS 1. The applicant has had this business in the same location for the past 10 years. It sits on the corners of Drew, Mars and Keene Road and the rear of the building (north) abuts single-family residential homes. All other surround parcels are commercial and institutional. The building itself is to remain. Currently there are two trailers on site which are in code violation. These trailers will be removed and an addition wilt be placed on the west side of the building and additional parking to be provided to the north. 2. The proposed development is consistent with other commercial developments surrounding this parcel. 3. The heath and safety of persons residing or working in the surrounding area will be affected. The existing use of the business is not changing, only expanding to better serve its clients. 4. Drew Street and Keene are two major roads surrounding the proposed development. The existing curb cut on Drew Street will remain. There are currently two curb cuts on Mars, these will be moved a little further north to further from the intersection of Mars and Drew. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Drew Street is zoned commercial. The surrounding parcels consist of a cleaners, repair shop, florist, auto mechanics, etc. 6. The proposed development is being improved visually. The trailers will be removed from the site, the existing building will have a new face lift and remodeling will be taking place inside. Hours of operation will not change, _ Monday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (approximate). ~ D ~ Ct~ ~ ~'~ `'+,' ~ ~, RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA ~F~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~_____ 1. The proposed development is impractical without devia io~ ~' r~e; bw~eTr`~h~s purchased the lot to the north of his existing building for ad~d~tional parking to . • • bring the building up to code. Although we are still short parking spaces per code, we have attached a traffic analysis supporting that the parking supplied is more than adequate for this retail store. The required number of parking spaces based on the square footage of the building is 38 (this is based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The current building, 7,925 square feet only provided approximately 10-15 parking spaces for the last 10 years of business. The owner has contended that he has never had every parking space occupied. Currently, we are adding 1668 square feet to be the building and approximately 1100 is for storage. We are adding an additional 13 spaces to the site for approximately 500 square feet of additional square footage. 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately X500,000.00: 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 6. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 7. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off-street parking is being eliminated. .-- `•~ z '~ ~ `~ ~ ,~ ~~,~.. 1 ~•'~ -~ ,~ ~~ . ; . k I* U S ~ evised 9/ll%20b5 '? FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project D ~ (~ ~ ~ t'J PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup SEp ~ ~ 2005 1770 Drew Street - Chainwheel Drive NES #470 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side under the provisions of 2-304.D; reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east long North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under provisions of Section 3-1202.G. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant has had this business in the same location for the past 10 years. It sits on the corners of Drew, Mars and Keene Road and the rear of the building (north) abuts single-family residential homes. All other surround parcels are commercial and institutional. The building itself is to remain. Currently there are two trailers on site which are in code violation. These trailers will be removed and an addition will be placed on the west side of the building and additional parking to be provided to the north. 2. The proposed development is consistent with other commercial developments surrounding this parcel. 3. The heath and safety of persons residing or working in the surrounding area will be affected. The existing use of the business is not changing, only expanding to better serve its clients. 4. Drew Street and Keene are two major roads surrounding the proposed development. The existing curb cut on Drew Street will remain. There are currently two curb cut on Mars, these will be move a little further north to further from the intersection of Mars and Drew. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Drew Street is zoned commercial. The surround parcels consist of a cleaners, repair shop, florist, auto mechanics, etc. 6. The proposed development is being improved visually. The trailers will be removed from the site, the existing building will have a new face lift and remodeling will be taking place inside. Hours of operation will not change, Monday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (approximate). RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA Page 1 of 2 Revised 9/21/2005 The proposed development is impractical without deviations. The owner has purchased the lot to the north of his existing building for additional parking to bring the building up to code. Although we are still short parking spaces per code, we have attached a traffic analysis supporting that the parking supplied is more than adequate for this retail store. 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 6. Anytime you can make site improvements .to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 7. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on three front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on three sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. ~~~ ~~~ 1~,~~i`~a D ~, ~. SEA' `~~ ~~ ~:s„a Page 2 of 2 i ~ ` ` V' /~q J ~- Planning an velopment ~~ ' 100 South Myrtle Ave e Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~., Telephone:727-562-4567 ~~, ~,- , ,~,~ ,_ _K Fax: 727-562-4576 ~:•,~ ` ~ - ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED aNO NoTaRize~ APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan ~ , o~ v' CASE #: ---------------- DATE RECEIVED: __ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ___________ ZONING DISTRICT: _______, LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING 8~ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _____ / __ SOUTH: / WEST: ----~ ~ ~- - EAST: I COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY :APPLICANT NAME~I~'~~ MAILING ADDREStS~~~ PHONE NUMBER: ~L 1_~L PROPERTY OWNER(S): "~r!~ R AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) G FAX NUMBER: ~~ ~ "/~-~-Q_- _--- (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) MAILING ADD PHONE NUMBER: ~ 1_ ~/~ ~.7' ~__-- FAX NUMBER: _ ~~ ~ .~_~ _ - The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a .Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary infcsrl~lation in ad€lition to the information provided on this worksheet: Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. ~~~~~~~ ~; ~~ s OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Ss1 f~C,sl,~ ~~ - A- Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. tf:iia4: 4~ f~~ J 0912112005 14:57 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SUCS PAGE 02102 <<, ~ Property Valves. The landsca}~eatment proposed in the Comprehensive L~scap® Program will have a beneficial Impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for d®velopment. R~. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Pleese return CheekAst for revietiro and verification. 6. That (1/wei, the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is trae and Correct. Property Owner Propa~ly Owner STATE OF FI,®RIDA,, C~DLTIVTY OF PLNELLA5 $isfore nrte the u deralgned, an officer duly contmisaloned by the IarNS of the Stat® of Fioridg, ~lE~ ~ TH~R~D d>ty of on this ~E~Fi/ul~~~ 21d~ persatralry appeared ~ s D~1~n1 _~~[ito having bean first duly sworn Deposes and 9syg that holshe fulry understands the contents of the affidavit that he16h g9@ ~i ned. r Ma Commission Expires: MA~/ 0 3~ Zoe ~ w. . Notary PulbUc ~'a~YP~~i aaOJ1a ~~~~ 0 '~ S: application formsldevelopmerrt revi®ur/eom ehensfve landsca e r ~c ~~ ~'!#_~ Pr p p vgram dpplication,doC .9i~. ~~. ~~ s^: D ~~~~~~ Sr.P (~:..,2005 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !'~ . ' Revised 9/22/2005 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Landscape Program PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street - Chainwheel Drive NES #470 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: A reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east long North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet (to existing building) under provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 1. Architectural Theme: A. NA B. 3'73 various plantings including but not limited to Indian Hawthorn, magnolia, crepe Myrtle will be provided to the site. The existing site contains virtually no green space or landscaping. With the small proposed addition, many site enhancements will be provided. The landscape plan will provide a strong enhancement to the streetscape. All available open space will be heavily planted. 2. No lighting is proposed at this time. 3. The proposed landscaping will provide a mixture of textures, heights, layers and colors and enhancing the community character and streetscape. 4. The surrounding property values will benefit from proposed development and landscape plan as both will provide an increase to the value of the subject site which in turn will provide an increase to the value of the subject site which in turn will raise the value of the surrounding properties. Additionally, the extensive quality list of proposed plantings will offer much visual reward to the surrounding sites and the community as a whole. 5. The project site is located in the Scenic Corridor and all landscaping will comply with the City of Clearwater's adopted plans for this area as well as the Pinellas County's Scenic/Non-Commercial Comdor Plan. All buffers will be upheld where no variances have been requested, all site visibility triangles will be upheld to ensure safety, low maintenance plans have been designed as well as low water demand plantings. The developer is also aware of his responsibility for the on-site buffer maintenance. :xfd .; ~~ o~~~onr~~1 SEP 23 2005 ~~~~ sy Page 1 of 1 ,' ORIGINAL ~ ORIGINAL Planning Department ? 100 South Myrtle Avenue ~,~ ~~ Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~m-~ ,~~~L`°~..~- Telephone:727-562-4567 ~ ~,,: -~ •=ti.~ ?.= Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans -- ' ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~-___ CASE #: _ - ___ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ _ ATLAS PAGE #: _ ____ ZONING DISTRICT: _ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: , NORTH: __ SOUTH: WEST: _ _ EAST: __ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEiIELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) ---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT--- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME• ~,/-i1~,. s~cc~o __ _ MAILING ADDRESS~yI~~ s/~f /?)flL. ~ YL Ci (,~' A-iZUJ~~i ~, / 3~~~~~f PHONE NUMBER: /`i7 ~ ~'S/Ti -~ t~ ~ ~ FAX NUMBER: ~~ -_7 ~ 'LOQ~ _ PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~~/,~ f. ~ fJ14.a~[ ~~~~(,[~ (Must-inc/lude ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME:~~_h~~{l.~GLr ~~~' _~~p~,~~~E~I~~~~~~ -- MAILING ADDRESS:(,~9 L_J/' /!~~_[~_~~ ~ ~ 7__ ~ ~ /.>rA~ ~___,~''~ S~L!~J PHONE NUMBER:~7 7 ?`~ Z~ ~e ~_ FAX NUMBER: ~~_ ~~! Z-c.~~ CELL NUMBER: ~~__~~~_ E-MAIL ADDRESS: C ~i-jt /~,SP~la~ ~~ , ~~ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) f I~~ ~=~ }~ ! - j ~ i~,~ r ~' ( STREET ADDRESS of subject site~._..~Cl___ ,!1_~~~_~ ~_1 `~ ~ I w Y,+T'I ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~!~~~~ /~P/t~i?L/.~L~ ~lL~/y ` ~ ~ i "~~ O ~ ~O~ ~ ~ i (if not listed here please note the location o this document in the submittal) _ ~~,s_,,,~ - PARt;ELNUMBER: ~IJ- Z ~i-1.5.4 ~ - E11_~ ~ ~,~, ,-~ v r~c'~ .-_.__ 't? '{l~ PARCEL SIZE: i ' (acres, square feet) (~, ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S)~~~~,S~ca~j~iL'2."!C-~.C_-E~~S-~-7^~.~~~~ ~5`~,~J.~~-- (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):~e~!~ euc~j('LC~~_-~!y/PIJ~/~' -_ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (incude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) I 4 II ~C ~~ Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREY SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES __ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C_./PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) id SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA-Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. (,/~ ~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. (~ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. D 1`'rILC~ ~ ~-~-91~~ ~ _ 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate viciriity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ll - -- ~ ~ -. rI ~ ~ ~ E ~_.!.= =.~ I ! ~ provide complete responses to the ten.(10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PR~JECT C~~E~I (as a~ ~~ble)~ ~~plain how each criteria is achieved in detail' ' , , ~ ~ L ~" j --.1 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical w~thout deviations-from the use; ~ tensity :. ~t,~ and development standards. - _, . Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • •ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed far development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. -- ~ ~~ fl~~ r `1 ' ~, {t ~ ~ ,, 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines~in.Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicabl ),...../ Use separate sheets as necessary. I ! .__.~,.,.._~.......... „~.~,~' ~, r `1C5 ~~_~~,~ SLR ~ f~5~~~ ~ --- _ _ ....... ~. Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a sformwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduc8on in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. / If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; __ Proposed, grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed sformwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed sformwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the ity manual __ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on alt plans and calculations. ^~`~OPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of sformwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): sformwater plan as noted above is included provided. sformwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a gradirig plan and finished floor elevations shall CAU~i iON - lF APPL1CATlON REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPL1CATlON MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562.4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) O~IGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 74 copies; f~~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; C`3' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ~~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior ///~~~ _ to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering prir)cigles. ThP findings ofthe study yvill be used in determining whet~ier or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ~~RADING PLAN, as applicable; ~P PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~ ~ ~ ~~ rLtl ~ _ I ~ ~ 1 {~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ D ~ ~ ~ i.3 i' ! i1 ~~ _.. I ~ I All dimensions; ~ ! ' _ North arrow; ~ ~ cFe°~ 0 ~ z005 ! j ; ~ _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~ ~J __ Location map; ~ ~ ~ __ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ~---•----~-°~~-""""'"'"-""'"" E' aL ~ __ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ~~~ . ' ~ l~~ ; f t ' ~ ` ~~ t.t ' ' ' ' "' - Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; - • •• ~ _._ All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight Viangles; __ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation acid wildl ife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; __ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~RIGINAL __ location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; __ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; __ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures: and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: __ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including ail paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11) and color rendering'rf possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: - One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; __ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H./LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ` [' " ' ~ ~ °" ~ ~ ~ ~~ ` Cd LANDSCAPE PLAN: "" $ ~ __ All existing and proposed structures; ~ I i i Names of abutting streets; Draina e and retention areas includin swales side slo es and bottom levations ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ; ; .~ ~ ~ ' I __ g g , p ; e , Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; -- -' j _ Sight visibility triangles; ,~,~,~,,,~,,, . _„_ __._. _ ~ ' Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; F ~;`, , ~ ~ w ,'„ i _ Proposed and required parking spaces; i „ ; t ; ,; _ _^ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and Locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; __ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); - Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering 'rf possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ORIGINAL I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; EDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS 1 Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. - All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/~ X 11} (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or'rf the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the Ciiy's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) ~~ ~~ ~ ~ c-' I~; (~~ I ~ ] ~~l T~, ~, Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. } ~ ~~ + ~ ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ! ~ j ~ ~'F~ O ~1 MAC , ~ i ~ ~, ~ L LtJUJ ~ ` ~ 4 Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all r ~adwayt legs and each turning movement at all intersections idenfrfied in the Scoping Meeting. ~>; """"""""° "~ •-°° - -~ Traffic Impact. Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the Ciiy Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 56211750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersi ed, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS applicat' n ar true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and _Swetn t and subscribed before ,tae this ~ day of authori ~ Ci representatives to visit and photograph the property ~ i' ~%~ A•D. 20~J to me and/or by descri ed in is application. ~ '~ " _ who is personally known has produced •'~ _ as - ~d ntification. ~ - Si nat re of perry o er or repre ,~ ire , ~,t .! (d ~~irjr L~ __ iv °4, DOREEN A. WILLIA ary public, ,~ < MY COMMISSION # DD 155802 commission expires: ~ ~o , 1.8063NOTAfiY R Notary! Service $ Bonding, Inc. Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 11/29/2@04 11:25 7274468@3~ NORTHSIDE ENG SUC~ PAGE @2i @2 CITY OF CLEAR~,ATER O R I G I~~ I~. AFFID.t~~TIT TO AUTH4Rx~E AGENT ~` PT,,.ANIVZNG & DEdE~,OpiViENT SE~.VTCES ADh+dIh1IS~'RAxIQri1 ttittJNiCTPAL SI;RViGES SUIi.D1NG, J00 SCUTH hfYRT'LE A~EN~JE, 7"" FLQ()R PFIONE (?2'7)•592-4561 FA,X (?7,7j 592-4578 (Address or General Locp>9on) 2, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (Newrn crt PeQUast} 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do} appoint ~~y _}~, es any petltton; 4, That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Eforida to insider and act on the above described property; 5. That {ilwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing i true and correct. c ~o~~ o , Property Owner SXA'1~ OF FLORIDA, COUIVTV OF PIIVEt.LAS B fora a the underslg etl, an officer duty corns 1~~, personapy appeared ` dapps®s antl says that he/she fully understands My Commisston Ex'pVlree:l ~ l U7 ~ ~ ~ y f i ~' ~,-,~ ~~ ~~.:.; i '~ S; epptlCetton tor'm9ltleveb' tHent ~vtA q~d9vtt to rpe q ant ' ; ~I f ` , p ~~ ~ V ~ C~ a !J L7._..._....~..,.__,_.,~ .. .. _ _. , ~ ~~.~Yf ~ ~ , t ~„~. t't.i 4. _ ._, laws of the State of th on this ~~ dgy of r~t~ng be9n first duly swum ;~v'Py'~% Linda S. Corso :~•" ' :.; ,- MY COMMISSION # DD354601 EXPIRES ~,P ~ September 13,2008 '•FO~F~o,• 60NDEDTHRLITR~:>~~-?IN INSURANCE,INC C 1. That (I am/we are} the owners} end record title holder{s} of the follovwing described property: 11/18'2004 11:07 7274aF~t03~ IJORTHSIUE EFJG' C~ ~~ PAGE 02; 02 -~ ORIGINAL LETTER OF AUTHORIZJATfON This {attar will serve as authorization for ~T.ough Ghovaee with Nor#hside Engirceriing Services, fnc. to act as an agent for ~„~~~,~~~(r.>r~ -- and to execute any and all documents related to securiAg permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 11 ~ ~ ~ e~ ~-~ rn e~ - _-~ lying within ~~ 5 r ' •~,~1~s~5 County, State of ~~~~'~ ~.~_• ~.. ~ • ~~tl om~S ~~~• Signature of Property, ,rner Print Name of Property Owner Address of Property Owner Telephone Number CitylState/dip Code State of ,~~~~h A The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this ~ ~T N day County of 1'11.1~u-WS of eVta'Y1flF~t. ag ~gy~6ihpS Q~~l1p , as _ who is personally known to me orwho has produced iFL ~r1 VE1tS as identification and who did (did not) take an oath, ,~ti~Y e~%~, Margaret E Reeves *: .+': MY COMMISSION # DD344640 EXPIRES as~^ .,~o' Augusta 2 _1 ,,;, ~;,, BONDEDTHRUTROYFAINI S ~Qj~' Notary Public (Signat~t, ) ~~ Commission # (SEAL ABOVE] 1 ~~~"i ~~~ R"~~~Name of No1ery Typed, Printed or Stamped) ~'~~ 0 ~ 2005 ~ , __ ~.._ _ ; P~ ~FJtllP~af,; 8 DEVc~.~~ ...._. r FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 0 ~ ~ (` ~ N n L 1770 Drew Street lJ I V ~1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.5' to pavement, 15.5' to building, (south) from 25' to 4.2' to pavement, side setback (east) from 10' to 5' to pavement and 9' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. A reduction to parking from 38 required spaces to 28 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The development will be in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The existing building which is to remain is a one-story building which is similar to surround properties. There is no bulk to the building and the coverage, density and character are all in likeness to surrounding parcels. If the proposed development was not on three fronts, the project could have probably been designed with no deviations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder adjacent Land and building nor impair values. The existing building will be remaining, an addition being added to the building and site improvements being made. This will only increase surrounding values. 3. No health or safety issues arise from this project. More than anything, it has increased the safety. Existing trailers which were used far storage are being removed and site improvements are being made. 4. No additional traffic will be at the site. All ingress and egresses are being maintained except for upgrades. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character. All the surrounding parcels are retail, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. 6. No adverse effects will be made to adjacent properties. The north of the property abuts residential, but we will be placing a b' landscaped fence along the property line as to further buffer the residences. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1. The property is impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the property being surrounded by three streets, with 25' setbacks, this is impossible. There would be ng room for building. ~C o I~ C~ f~ Q ~J r ~~ c ~-~ ' I~ ; ~:~ 01005 r;~ ~fi~~ . lJl~v, ,~_ 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. Other suitable sites may be available throughout the City of Clearwater, but the owner has been at this location for approximately 10 years and only wished to expand his operation. so other sites were not practical. 6. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 7. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 8. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. 9. Off-street parking is being provided for the site. By code, 4-5 spaces are required for retail. By these calculations, we should be required to have 38 parking spaces our site is short 10 parking spaces. Included in our application is a parking demand study. Prior to the applicant redeveloping, he had approximately 10 - 15 parking spaces for 7,925 square feet of building. There has never been a day when all parking spaces were occupied. The addition to the property is 1,663 square feet of space, 1,100 square feet for storage. Even though we are shy 10 spaces, we still do not feel on- street parking will take place. The parking calculations were based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. No consideration was taken into account far the storage square footage. This would not account for an additional need of parking spaces. The only staff accessing storage would be for the ones already accounted for under actual retail space. 10. N/A _.J • ...~,..._.,..~_,,._.,..._ _ _._ __ f ~, ~~ ~ ~~ _~ _~ LJ ~~- - ~ ~ ~~~ 0 ~ 2005 ~ 4 Calculations using the most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 6th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report ppscnptlofjll,TE:'Code '!.. ? tJ'ri is '; Expe`cfed i~_i<pgFted.,: PM ea)< .. 1?M In t'M Out .., . ... :. ~ > >. t- ~ ': Units Datt TrI s<- . Dips • Total Truck Terminal 030 Acres - General Li ht Industrial 110 TSF Gross Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross _' Not Available ' Sin le Famil Homes 210 DU _ _ A artments 220 DU Mobile Home Park 240 DU _ i Retirement Communi 250 DU `' Not Available All Suites Hotel 311 Occ.Room Motel 320 Occ.Room Marina 420 Berths Health Club 493 TSF Gross ` Not Available Church 560 'f SF Gross _ Da care Center 565 TSF Gross General Office 710 TSF Gross _ Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross Buildin Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross S ecialt Retai! Center 614 TSF Gross ~ '-'96't' 390 25 11 14 Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Availabl Not Available Sho in Center 820 TSF Gross ~ Qualit Restaurant 831 _ _ TSF Gross ' __ _ Hi h Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 832 TSF Gross _ _ Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 833 TSF Gross _ Not Available Fast Food with Drive Thru 834 TSF Gross __ _ i Drive Thru Onl 835 TSF Gross ',Not Available Service Station 844 Fuel. Position Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 845 Fuel Position _ _ Tire Store 848 Service Ba s Su ermarket 650 TSF Gross `r Convenlen. Mkt O en 24 hrs 651 TSF Gross _ _ Corivenien. Mkt O en 18 Hrs 662 TSF Gross _ ~_ " Not Available Convenien. Mkt w/Gas Pum s 853 TSF Gross.. Discount Club 861 TSF Gross _ _ ___ ! Furniture Store 890 7SF Gross j Walk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross _ _ Drive-In Bank 912 _ Dr(veln Wlndo. Y:\Public\Agency Apps\FDOT\[tripcal8.xls)Calcuiations 22-Jun-05 Chalnwheel Drive t 1 --- ~~ ~ O it LI iJ .... i tip N C7. : ~ r ,;,_~ sau ~o n ~w Lurtcti Hour~,TrafFlc'":'~ ' Total In Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 »»»> No calculations but studies show'Lunch Peak 146-364 two way trips Also see a non ITE Method In tab tilled "Gas and Conv.Mk" --~{-~ !~.> r-- • Planning Department r ' 100 South Myrtle Avenue ' ~~~ ~~. ~~ Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~,,... ~` _~~„ Telephone:727-562-4567 o;,.. ' `~^ -~°' ~ _ ~ - ' Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATIONFEE~ ORIGINAL CASE #: ____ _ ______ DATE RECEIVED: _ ~ _ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: _ _ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: _ SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _ _ _ SOUTH: _ WEST: _ EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) ---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ~~1x~-~S~ [. _ _ _-__ __ MAILING ADDRESS:~_~_ ~~~~ /`L .~ .~ ~ S PHONE NUMBER:~~~?_7 Z li~~_-- FAX NUMBER: ~~L~~~O~ PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~~~~y~ L _ /L/V ~~~~~Gc- ~ _ _ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAM ~ ~~-~~~-~~`-"-~ ~6 E11~L~--':~~---'~'~ C ``~--~' - MAILING ADDRESS~~_C~1~~_~L.. ~ ~ ~1~.t~~4 ~/~~ ~G '.537 __ PHONE NUMBER: ~~-!!~~ ---- FAX NUMBER: /`~ 7 ~7 ~P~(~.~5 ~---- CELL NUMBER: /~ 7 ~C~ ~Q ~~ E-MAIL ADDRESS~~L\~~Y/_~~ ~~1 v`~ .L/.t/ 6i . ~ ariy B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMEN~TIINFO M`ATION: (Co[d~e Sectio/n 4202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: / /~ ~/L ~ ~ C.~ ` _2~ -~r.-~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ 4" ~ _~~ c~/C~~~j~_~~__ (If not listed here please ote the location f his document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: ~=/Z ~- ~~, - ~J`~f~~~C7___~1.C~ PARCEL SIZE: ~ C9~•~~-_ / _ °~~~ ~1'- - _-- (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S~~~ !~~iJ~ /( L.~{~a.l.~,S~,.~ - (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) I~ (,n.1 f~ fl SID-~r~ 4 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~',~ _ Q.x- ~~ P ~G~~~ ~C.J ~ Altach sheets and be specific when identltying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parki 4y ~ a7cels` speciftc use, etc.); - ------ ------- -- --~- U t). ~iYI~J - fi Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIQJJSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO~/(if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C/PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) g SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR 51GN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. l7 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-993.A) Provide wmplete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impairthe value thereof. /~~ ,, (o- ~j 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. (,s -/ 4. minimi ze traffic congestion. The proposed development is designed t o / ( ~ ~ ,~ ~ /~ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. _ ` . g~~ S~~ 0 ~ 2005 .~_.! ~'~ i Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL ^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of t~hje~pa~rc~erl~proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~C~~~~C~~~.~ ~~ ~,I ~ ~ ~'~~ 0 ~ 245 ! ~..~ 1 Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- Cit~otf~lcarwater a • ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDIt zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.5' to pavement, (south) from 25' to 8.5 to pavement and 15.5 to building, side setback (east) from 10' to 5' to pavement and 9' to existing buildang. A request far a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. Reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 38 spaces to 28 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant has had this business in the same location for the past 10 years. It sits on the corners of Drew, Mars and Keene Road and the rear of the building (north) abuts single-family residential homes. All other surround parcels are commercial and institutional. The building itself is to remain. Currently there are two trailers on site which are in Bode violation. These trailers will be removed and an addition will be placed on the west side of the building and additional parking to be provided to the north. 2. The proposed development is consistent with other commercial developments surrounding this parcel. 3. The heath and safety of persons residing or working in the surrounding area will be affected. The existing use of the business is not changing, only expanding to better serve its clients. 4. Drew Street and Keene are two major roads surrounding the proposed development. The existing curb cut on Drew Street will remain. There are currently two curb cuts on Mars, these will be moved a little further north to further from the intersection of Mars and Drew. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Drew Street is zoned commercial. The surrounding parcels consist of a cleaners, repair shop, florist, auto mechanics, etc. 6. The proposed development is being improved visually. The trailers will be removed from the site, the existing building will have a new face lift and remodeling will be taking place inside. Hours of operation will not change, Monday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (approximate). RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The proposed development is impractical without deviations. The owner has purchased the lot to the north of his existing building for add"i~tional parking to t ~ ~~~ 0 ~ 2005 ~ ~ ! ' i ~y ~ ORIGINAL bring the building up to code. Although we are still short parking spaces per code, we have attached a traffic analysis supporting that the parking supplied is more than adequate for this retail store. The required. number of parking spaces based on the square footage of the building is 38 (this is based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The current building, 7,925 square feet only provided approximately 10-15 parking spaces for the last l0 years of business. The owner has contended that he has never had every parking space occupied. Currently, we are adding 1668 square feet to be the building and approximately 1100 is for storage. We are adding an additional 13 spaces to the site for approximately 500 square feet of additional square footage. 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north,side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this properly is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sates are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 6. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 7. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off-street parking is being eliminated. - ~, ~a 1~ ~^y ~ l r p i......._._.. ~_. r3~r ti: . ~.wl ~A~ I~ ~ggi as T ~~ O ~~ ~~ ~~ D ~ Z I ~ I D >! r ~~1~ ~aZ ^ v ~~ e-r r-r r-e a-r r ~iia 'I ~ ~~~ ~~~ d ~~~ a~ yy ~~ ~ Aa '~~~ ~ '~ ~ ` ~ { ya ~ A ~ ~ " ~eae~ e =_-_=====J i y a~ »s p a ~~a! ~ 4 ~ / { $~ ~~ ~~~ { / ® 4 u~ Eb~ f L I~ ir~M\rN-~iM ~ f - Chainwhaal Driva r.~s~~ooe a~nn~s Clearwater, Florida 0 0 V J •r'~w 't7 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 111D~ ~~,i (I~ I't~ ti ~~ d 5 s :r a i 8~,~' i~ m z ~O D "•' N_ Z ^^D V/ m c Z O m A N m m A D m p~ @; i~ m D1 J~P .~ t , G./ii~~: ~~~ ; 0 /V (...w. V .~.~.~ Y __` ~ 23Q~ { --~_..,_._,_._.. ,f ! ~ '. ... d~Nd L wafl~c~ S ~ssocl~tN, p.~ su racy.. ww ~..s. ~ spew ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- Chainwheel Drive ~ ~~-+~~~ .. ~.neeooo ~ a~rrsswsa Clearwater, Florida ~ ~~3•~0~~~ 1~~~POS~ PLANh11,~yG ~ ;,F. rt~rir t~s~ ~ _ ... . ORIGINAL FLD2005-06054 1770 DREW ST Date Received: 06/23/2005 CHAINWHEEL DRIVE ZONING DISTRICT: MDR LAND USE: RM ATLAS PAGE: 279B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR CLWCoverSheet ~~ ~~ ORIGINAL FLD2005-06053 1101 S FT HARRISON AVE Date Received: 06/20/2005 CRISTINO'S RESTAURANT ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 295B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR CLWCoverSheet ~~~~~~~~ ~~y ~~A August 9, 2005 Mr. Michael Reynolds Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Reynolds: CIVIL • LAND PLAPJN!>\IG • ENViRG~Ivh1E~~TAL • -I-RA!'dSPORTATION • ORIGINq~ Listed below are our responses to the August 5, 2005 DRC comments along with revised drawings. General Engineering 1. Double dumpster enclosure has been provided and will be in compliance with Index #701. Dumpster location has been satisfied by .Solid Waste and Traffic at DRC meeting. 2. All F.D.O.T. permitting will be obtained. Fire 1. It is acknowledged that this is not an approval of construction plans or documents other than site work. 2. The one-way drive aisles have been revised to 20'. "No Parking Fire Lane" has been provided on asphalt. 3. 30 degree turning radii has been provided at the ingress/egress. 4. No longer need to comply with HS25 since there is no longer a vault. 5. Fire hydrant has been located within 300' of building. Land Resources 1. The four failing Laurel Oaks to be removed. 2. Declining 12" Oak along Mars will be removed. 3. Innovative sidewalk has been designed around the 24" and 21" Oaks along Mars. Stormwater 1. Vault has been replaced with surface treatment pond. Solid Waste 1. Dumpster enclosure to be constructed to City specification. At the DRC meeting it was agreed by traffic and solid waste where the dumpster would be located. A double dumpster to be provided; one for debris and one for cazdboazd. tso~ C!rvo:!Arar~ s-rR~„T, s~!•rC ~3c Cl.tAR~VATER, Fi.Cf<i~•A 33753 N E SAl~r'~h! N@!y1! N X75 P Z i N G.COh?~ N F;TEC~-iC~l~%~I N L35P R~ NC.CGJ~~! 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ~UEkJI{', ~ !i ~ ~, $ zoos ~ ,~' _-, _..._._.__.__..__.. i :~•~~~~; ~ PEAS:'. _ 4 • Mr. Michael Reynolds O R ~ G August 9, 2005 !- Page Two ~'raffic Engineering 1. Loading parking space has been provided with a 24' drive aisle. 2. 60 degree angled parking spaces have been revised to comply with City standards. 3. Sight visibility triangle for egress drive on Drew is shown. . 4. Fence has been redesigned as to not obstruct sight visibility triangles. 5. The fence does not go across the driveway. 6. Sidewalk has been revised to 4' wide. 7. Signage has been installed along with directional arrows on pavement. 8. All curb cuts to the property are existing. The Drew Street access will be an exit/right turn only. This will reduce any back up of traffic on Drew and stacking will occur on site. The two curb cuts on Mars are necessary for the additional parking lot to the north of the property and the curb cut on the south side of the property for loading. 9. It is acknowledged that driveway must be 125' from Drew/Keene intersection. Tn speaking with DOT, this must remain as is. 10. Transportation impact fees are acknowledged. Planning 1. Sheet C3.1 shows boundary line of zoning separation. 2. Zoning label has been corrected. 3. The vault has been removed. 4. New storage building square footage has been noted. 5. We ,try our best on the aerials. 6. Dumpster location has been coordinated with solid waste department and traffic. 7. All exterior lighting has been indicated. 8. No signage is being applied for at this time. It will be under separate permit and conform.to all codes and regulations. 9. Sidewalks connecting Drew to the residential activity at the rear has been labeled as existing. 10. Bicycle rack has been located at the north side of the property. 11. Existing condition plan has been included. See attached. 12. Parking lot to the north has been redesigned. 13. Dumpster location and staging has been coordinate with solid waste. 14. Surface treatment pond has been provided instead of vault. If there are any additional comments, please feel free to call. Sincerely ~, 7 d_ ~~ 'DOT n A. Williams Project Director .._ GITY `. F ... _ . F . ,. ... c~ (~' ~;1- ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~; ~~~ ~ t ~ ' , ----~ r E ,~ a ~i FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive ORIGINAL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN The current retail bicycle shop consisted of a 1,663 square foot building. It housed sales and repairs of bicycles. Two large trailers were along the north side of the property for storage. The owner of the property was in code violation with the trailers and a new site plan began. The existing parking was fronting Drew Street and held approximately 15 spaces. There were also a couple of spaces along the west side of the building (Mars). C~~C~O~~~; ::. . ~; ~,~~ 1 ~ 2A05 ,__ C~'tY C:i ... . 'j FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) ---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- • •. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ' ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~___ ORIGINAL A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME~~J~~ .-~ ~~u~ _ MAILING ADDRESS•L~UU~~i~.~1~~+ ~ ~ „~`'S'14C~-~~ .f-~ ~~3~5~~J / - ---~' PHONE NUMBER: ~7 ' ~~Zi lOS ~ ~ - FAX NUMBER: ~`~ ~ 'S~~_'Z~OO,2g _ PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~/ytJ ~ ~fJ/~ J ~~CC_L ~ _ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME:~~~~-SLS/~~L. -~~-_G-a~Y ••-`~~,z-S-~~.~-'-''`~/ ~ ~,,C~~.~- MAILING ADDRESS:(~D / ~L~~_L ~~~~~~~~°,~t~~~____~~~7 ~ PHONE NUMBER:~7 7`~~_1~~~-` FAX NUMBER: ~~ ~-"~'-~yK--~~~ CELL NUMBER: ~OI.~ ~~~ Q~-__ E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~~~X l~.S'fJiGta~ C~ . ~ I~'r" CASE #. __ - _`____ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ ATLAS PAGE #: _____ _ ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: _ SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _- _ - SOUTH: WEST: - - EAST: ~. * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.Aj ~""'~" ll ~~ '}p ~C~C~~OC~~ STREET ADDRESS of subject siie~~(/ ~--~=-~~ ~ /- ~- -- -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~~~~ u~~j~~ /l{~~L ~v ~i _ (if not listed here, please note the location o this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 1 / - Z ~i - ~S- - r, __ t 1.i Al~F~(~ ~ E`)Gti :' ~,;..: it _.I PARCEL SIZE: t [_ _~ ' _~_ _ ~Y~CrT Y Qi- C"_ ~ ~ :,. - --', (acres, square feet) ~ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S)~~Q~~~~~L~IC~,~~~,'_~y~~tS~ ~5,~~~,G~ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) f ~~ rte. ~~ ~ i~~/s ~- ~~ ~_-u~~~.~~~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):~~__~~~G~ L ~f / ! r /-~ __ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in reyulred number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A. PREY SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES __ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) i~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see I page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide wmplete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA-Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. / (/ ~ ~p ~ /f 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof- !.~ ~ ,~ (~ ~ _/ f ---- _~__~~~ 7C..(. CT G ~~~~ 7fI 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ti 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ~G.. L~ f! .~~~ ii~c..~lc ~ ~ ~ - _ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfact ~ ha~-s fop ratio~i impabfs~,~~ r~ .~~! on adjacent properties. ~ `~~-' ... ---- ~// ~t_ 2~~ ~ ~iCC cY !~C ~~r ~ ~ Ir ` provide complete responses to the ten.(10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. i1 '~ ', I ~i J,~ ~~ Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~ ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. /`-~'` 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in th,,e ,C, illy of -Clearw(a~ter,. f 6. The development of the parcel proposed far development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14{of~A cl i nail ble-to_ ,._. avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. ; D ~~ ~ li~l ~ , ~ ~ - ~~ ~, - - -- ~p 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Divistion`5'of ~r~rycle ~~~a§`apphc~ble), ^. a Use separate sheets as necessary. """'~'° Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~ ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crite Manual and_4202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. Atl applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design. Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. / if a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall includi the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ -Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the ity manual. __ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professionai Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^~\~EOPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD} PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included provioeo. stormwater plan is not required and explanation narative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall CAU-i ION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. ' !f you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) p~IGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; '!~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size {DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; l3~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ~~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be iri accordance with accepted traffic engineering pri0ciples. ThP findings ofthe study yvill be used in determining whetj~er or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ~~RADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) i~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): (~ All dimensions; ~ I {- F~ ~~ North arrow; O r - r, ~ L.t ~`i~ ~ ~~ { ` , Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; v Location map; ~ ~, _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package: ~"~ '~ ~ ~~ ! i - Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures: 3`'' ~,~ _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; PLANNII+tG & pEVc"~G;';,;i~:"~ j $V~$ ___ All required sight triangles; -°~ ,,.~,._ __ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infitl Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~ ORIGINAL _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; __. All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; - Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities: Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in wririenltabular form: _ land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total. number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 '/: X 11) and color rendering 'rf possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip Tines) and condition of such trees. H./LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) O' LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; - Proposed and required parking spaces; __ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label} indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; __ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); __ Irrigation notes. !~ REDUCED IANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y: X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not 6e met. :,•~r.. '~ ~ r~ r:- n .- ~ r -.. ~3t~ ~ 1 ~ X005 K i f Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive InfiN Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part - /of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ld' BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; EDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS !Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. - ~ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 Y X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or'rf the proposed development: • WiII degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional taps per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment andlor iniersecfion with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the Ciiy's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee {727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway w_l\\egs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. v~_ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersi ed, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS applicat' n ar true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and _.Swatn t4 and subscribed before ,6~e this ~ _ day of authori a Ci representatives to visit and photograph the property ~ ~%` E .D. 2l)~? to me andlor by descri ed in is applicaiion. ~ _, who is personally known has produced as 4 ntification. - r - 1 , ~ xc ..n.,. ~,. . Si net re of perty o er or repre , - " ,- ~~j9' gU°~, DOREEN A. IMLLIA ~ , ary Public, ~ :1 _ I.j ~~1 ~r', ~ i vti ~ MY COMMISSION # DD 155802 commission expires. °-- ~ I I ~ ; 7 Oif~~ ' 1.gpp.gtdOTARY FL Notary Service & Bonding, Inc. ~~~, ' ~ ~oOC ~ ~ ( ~ ti J i _.., , Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Cteai~ntaterw~:~: '_.. 11!18!2004 11:07 727446't3036 NORTHSI hJG S~JL'S PAGE 02!02 -- - ORIGINAL LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This {after will serve as authorization for)tioush Gblovaee with Northside Engineering Services, )1ne. to act as an agent for and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at ~ 1 tv ~ t^ e~ 5~ r~ e~ ,lying within ~'~ rQ ~ s S County, State of F(~ ~ ~ ~c_, t r1 :,m~S ~eS<S~. Print Narne of Property Owner ~7a ~ ~!~ 2 ~~ ~7, Telephone Number City/5tatelZip Code State of +~~~h A The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this t ~~ day County of ~1 ~u-tAS of eVta'rtidl .. S ~by~0t`~t9S Qty P , as who is personally known to me or who has produced ~L 171 ~~ as identification and who did (did not) take an oath, ~+;; bklFgaret E Reeves =:. a MYCOMMISA~S~I~O,,,,,N# DD344640 EXPIRES '~~',A';,., F;d;'~~ 80N~E0 THRUyTROY FAIN ,() ~~ ~ 1 `sZ~ Notary Public (Signet ) {VC~ommispsion ft (SEAL ABOVE) ` -~~j a~~ R'~y~Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) l Y ~~ " Signature of Property n+ner ~] 1 tJ ~ f ee.;,.a fie. e Addlress of Property Owner ~'eCS ~~-v e'~-p V t ~ L ~3 7 5S - .~.~..~.~.. ~ i ,~ ~'~~.-=a 1 ~ 2005 ~ ~' ~ j ...f _-' , PLANNIiVG 8 D~:'yE ~~:.1 ,. 't ;',~C;;? w....,.~,.l~t~Y t~ ~e~.i~ ~.~..%.:..~t ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.5' to pavement, 15.5' to building, (south.) from 25' to 4.2' to pavement, side setback (east) from 10' to 5' to pavement and 9' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. A reduction to parking from 38 required spaces to 26 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The development will be in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The existing building which is to remain is a one-story building which is similar to surround properties. There is no bulk to the building and the coverage, density and character are all in likeness to surrounding pazcels. If the proposed development was not on three fronts, the project could have probably been designed with no deviations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder adjacent land and building nor impair values. The existing building will be remaining, an addition being added to the building and site improvements being made. This will only increase surrounding .values. 3. No health or safety issues arise from this project. More than anything, it has increased the safety. Existing trailers which were used for storage aze being removed and site improvements .are being made. 4. No additional traffic will be at the site. All ingress and egresses are being maintained except for upgrades. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character. All the surrounding parcels are retail, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. 6. No adverse effects will be made to adjacent properties. The north of the property abuts residential, but we will be placing a 6' landscaped fence along the property line as to further buffer the residences. COMPREIIENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1. The property is impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the property being surrounded by_three streets, with 25' setbacks, this is impossible. There would be no room for b ~'Ig~i g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E'] ~ ~ ~ '` ~ IJ c~ _ ~~' ~~ ;~ _ ~',~s~ 1 ~ 1005 ~' ~~ p ..~ ~- ~ ORIG~~ A~ 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales.are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. Other suitable sites may be available throughout the City of Clearwater, but the owner has been at this location for approximately 10 years and only wished to expand his operation so other sites were not practical. 6. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 7. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 8. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. 9. Off-street parking is being provided for the site. By code, 4-5 spaces are required fox retail. By these calculations, we should be required to have 38 parking spaces our site is short 7 parking spaces. Included in our application is a parking demand study. Prior to the applicant redeveloping, he had approximately 10 -15 parking spaces for '1,925 square feet of building. There has never been a day when all parking spaces were occupied. The addition to the property is 1,663 square feet of space, 1,100 square feet for storage. Even though we are shy 11 spaces, we still do not feel on- street parking will take place. The parking calculations were based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. No consideration was taken into account for the storage square footage. This would not account for an additional need of parking spaces. The only staff accessing storage would be for the ones already accounted for under actual retail space. 10. N/A .. -~ r - ~ r- ~ ' ` ,; ~~~ 1 ~ 2005 ~ F i _...~- , ~..~, RI ANNltJr ~ t3E ~. c ~,_, ~ r, { ,s'~~.~ I • `~. Planning Department T 100 South Myrtle Avenue ~,(~~~ ~;~ Clearwater, Florida 33756 • ~: ,~ ._-~,,._.. ~. r`-~~_ '-M,,..:,~* Telephone: 727-562-4567 `: ~~ ~'~i-~.~..4-z,~w- -~ ~"e'"~ Fax: 727-562865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ • CASE #: _____ ______ _ DATE RECEIVED: _ __ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ^__ ATLAS PAGE #: _ ZONING DISTRICT: __ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ___ SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _ _ SOUTH: _ _ WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) o R ~ G ~ ~ A L FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised iz/3o/zo04) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT--- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICAi MAILING PHONE NUMBER:~~ PROPERTY OWNER(S): ` .1 i AGENT NAME~J~X~ I/1~~./-~/f~~y-~~,-,/-(1i~iL/ /~.J-e'_~G Ci~l ~26NGC/L/.e IL' ~~IC~. ~/C L-~ ~ -~~C . MAILINGADDRESS_~Qfr ~-L~Jf1~.~!_~~ ~.~~~~ ~,~ ~z./~~,~G_ 337 PHONE NUMBER: ~~_!~~_~.~lo ~ _FAXNUMBER: /~ 7 ~7CF ~~~~ CELL NUMBER: /a 7 _ 7C) L Q ~~ E-MAIL ADDRESS:~~~c~~~~-~-~r~~! B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFO/~M`AT_I`ON: (Code Section 4202.A) ( ~ ~ ~ / _ /~% ~ C-+ ~ STREET ADDRESS of sub'ect site: ~~ [%/L~L(J 1 ~ --~s~ rr LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ( ~~ ~4'" L ~~~~ ~ G _ . _ (if not listed here please ote the location f his document in the submittal) ~_ _ _~_~C~ ____ _ PARCEL NUMBER: ~=~g ~~ - ~~C~C / ~ / PARCEL SIZE: ~ ~~ ~ / °~;7 C~ ~L / ~L ~ _ . -- _ (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S~~GT---~12,~ ~~_ `~~~.~_b~/~ ----- (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) ,..~r,. _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _~~ _~..~Z`~(~`~I t'Y~~`~ ~ `f~ ~J ~" t y~ ~ ~~ - Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in require of parking spaces, specific use, e ) Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~" 7 ~~~ ~ FAX NUMBER: ~~ ~'Y' ~.P Z Oz7 __ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) ~~-' 4 l~ 1 I ~~ J~ t 'c ~ ` ~ ~ ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIQIJSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES __ NO _~/(if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C/PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ,~/ ~ , / ~-~-- 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ~ 4. minimi ze traffic congestion. The proposed development is designed t o / ( Q ~ /J 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. --- ~y ~ (~~~ ~__ C~-~ ZL~ G kG ~C~c/J/~ ~O _ - p I~C~l~~1l~~~? ~ ~~, _l! ~~l~' ~ ~o~ ~,~ i Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL ^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site anfl the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Cleanwater. ~.~~,F-~~ ~~ SSG `~ ° -~._ 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develop~m~en~tf _~~~ 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate viciniiy of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Ctearwafer as a whole. i'~ ~ f`~ ~ ~ ~v 1 "~' ~"--~ A~ i ~!~ ~; 1 ~ 1005 ~ ~'. Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ' ~ • ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.5' to pavement, (south) from 25' to 8.5 to pavement and 15.5 to building, side setback (east) from 10'.to 5' to pavement and 9' to existing building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping, on the south side of the fence instead of the north. Reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 38 spaces to 29 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant has had this business in the same location for the past 10 years. It sits on the corners of Drew, Mars and Keene Road and the rear of the building (north) abuts single-family residential homes. All other surround parcels are commercial and institutional. The building itself is to remain. Currently there are two trailers on site which are in code violation. These trailers will be removed and an addition will be placed on the west side of the building and additional parking to be provided to the north. 2. The proposed development is consistent with other commercial developments surrounding this parcel. 3. The heath and safety of persons residing or working in the surrounding area will be affected. The existing use of the business is not changing, only expanding to better serve its clients. 4. Drew Street and Keene are two major roads surrounding the proposed development. The existing curb cut on Drew Street will remain. There are currently two curb cuts on Mars, these will be moved a little further north to _ further from the intersection of Mars and Drew. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Drew Street is zoned commercial. The surrounding parcels consist of a cleaners, repair shop, florist, auto mechanics, etc. b. The proposed development is being improved visually. The trailers will be removed from the site, the existing building will have a new face lift and remodeling will be taking place inside. flours of operation will not change, Monday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (approximate). RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The proposed development is impractical without deviation T e t~wngrrhas.. ;•., r___ purchased the lot to the north of his existing building for c~l a~ arkin~;`tol~~w._. ~ ~ ;! ''~f~~ ~. ~"! ~~ 1 ~ 2005 1 f _.~ c.,t..?..:~,~ _ ~_ • ~ ORIGINAL bring the building up to code. Although we are still short parking spaces per code, we have attached a traffic analysis supporting that the parking supplied is more than adequate for this retail store. The required number of parking spaces based on the square footage of the building is 38 (this is based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The current building, 7,925 square feet only provided approximately 10-15 parking spaces for the last 10 years of business. The owner has contended that he has never had every parking space occupied. Currently, we are adding 1668 square feet to be the building and approximately 1100 is for storage. We are adding an additiona114 spaces to the site for approximately 500 square feet of additional square footage. 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and ofd street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be a~ improvement for this corner. 6. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a. whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 7. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on two front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on two sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off-street parking is being eliminated. ..~ ... r•T....,,. r 1/29/2004 11:25 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SUCS PAGE 02%02 ~ ~RIGI CITX OF CLEA,R~11F~A.TER Nq L AFFIDAVIT' TO AUTI-IQ~.IZE AGENT PT.,A,NTrTIiNG & DEV~LOpMEN't SERVICES AD~11I1~1IST1t,ATION ivttJNtCJPAL SERVICES BUII.I?-NG, ! 00 SOLrTE'I RdYRTLE A~%ENUE, 2nn F~'LO()R PRONE (727)•5x2-4567 T'Ax 0727) 582-4576 -,-~~ ( ddre~ nr Gen6ral >_ocntlon) 2, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (Neturn of ripuoet} - ~, That the underslgned (has/have) appointed and (does/da) appoint 5. That {il+we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the fnregoing f true and avrrect. c~ Prppgrty Property Ouynor S7A'it£ OF FLOR-D,q, Cot1N'ty OF PINBU•AS B fora a tha underslg etl, en oFiCer duly comrnlst ~~~. personapyappeared ~1i depps®s and says that he/she fully understands the My Cotnmisston Explre$: S; appNCetlon fortneldevebprnent rewoWlAftldvWt to Autruarl7,o Agent IpN9 oftha 5ttats of F) 'da, on the r~~ dE1y of '~.4~.~'~'a~ing be9n first duly sworn ~;~:~'_~'-•, Linda S. Corso :~•' ~. :,; ,,= MY COMMISSION # DD354601 EXPIRES , -,,. :o September 13,2008 •,eoF~o?;~ 60NDEDTHRUTP~~y.e?.N~NSU CE,- ~ ~ ., -. ~!~,~1 ~ ZOC;: ~~ __ 1. That (I am/we are) the owner{S} and record title holders} of the following described property: 4, That this afildavit has been executed to induce the Ciry of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; ~~w Paice~ w PTamber. 11/29/15 ~3946/0~0010 Gtaiirec ~1 TIN: ~ -~ Grantee ;~2 TIN: ~va~ranty. ~~~a This Indenture, Made this 4th day of January, l9 95 A.D. , Eetween ROBERT E. MEYER and MARTHA E. MEYER, his wife, of the County of PIIQELL~AS , State of Florida , ~'antorS, and THOMAS JESSUF and DOROTHY J. JESSUP, husband and wife whose addressis:1805 Drew Street, CLEARWATER, Florida 34625 of the Conntyof PINELLAS s State of Florlda , gI'$I]ttCeS. Witnesseth [hat the GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEiv St i'70/i0G ($1G . GC) - _. - - - - - - - -• UGLf.A1tS, and other good and valuable consideration [o GRANrORS in hand paid by GRANTEES, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold to [he said GRANTEES and GRANTEES' heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, Tying and being in the County of PINELI,AS State of FlOrlda to wit: Lots 1 and 2, WOODMERE HEIGHTS, according to the Plat thereof on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and 01REGCR©~~ Pinellas County, Florida recorded in Plat Book 45, page 45, REC G ~,sa•id land situate, lying and being in Pinellas Coilnty, Florida. D13219 y.. JU, DS 7ect to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, tNT -~~-any, and taxes subsequent to 1994... P/C ____ GERT __ r-Fins ~--_-- n~Tr- _ REV ! ____. ,:~ v hitvtgi'~te Tax Pd. I:arla2n F Do ak C rk, Plrtellas Ctwnly aY Dapury Cletlt ORIGINAL _~v L:J i•_I _, l{{.~.I _..i :.{i: _' J.ic t'_~c 'v i ~-:1 ... _s,il-` -- 3 - :.:i v . . ~' ~ .`3 iii'. ~ i ~:. . and [he grantors do hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. I11 ~1tneSS ~'Vhereafj the grnntots have hereunto set [heir hands_ nd seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered'in our presence: , /t i / / _.~.! '~~` ~~' G" ~~ ~~~ / (% (Seal) Printed Name: ~jc.cy',~~~,c ~~1~,~~"iJ ROBERT E. •MEYER wi s as o Both P.O. Address 2516 Robe~Street~~ , FL 34641 ~ ~' (~I~~- ///yy ¢.f ~ (Seal) Printed Name : •_ „•/ d~"f `f MARTHA E . MEYER [,Ji ±nrvcc go, ±p 73pth ~ g_O. AJdz^~- ?SIG P.ob~rta Sttoct, IARC:7, PL ~4tiM11 STATE ¢F Florida COUNTY ~F PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tbis 4th day of January, 1995 by ROBERT E. MEYER and MARTHA E. MEYER, his wife, ~'~~0~~~~~ ijj; D tr ~~:~ ~ ~ !? e~ 1 2Q~5 i , i _: , ,~s . c.... c.. _.:.... . w cn w J I~ _ u N'~ i,~ f`r) U~ to 1 O O N ~ I \ ~ IL~RETENTIONPOND OP EL. 70.2 'OIL. 69.0 ~ ' ~ #~ O I r I O zo'xz ~ s~art~mu (n ~ c"v / ~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ 3 ,1 ~ ~ Ln O ~~ W ~ ~~ r S t ` ~ II1I1 O ! fl €€' ~~ ;~t_ ~ ~ 1 ~ r^;4 v 1 ~ ~y ~T ~S~ ~ ¢ N s € ~ F ~~ I ~ , I, I , (~ ~- Ci!~ YLE7_',,,,~r' 7C-P~&~.7;; ~ / EfPR8~i:33' 'HRUATa Ba. r,O' ' ' ~ ~ t3 ; VNY.(tii)~E;. i + U . ~ I • ORIGINAL ~"LR; . ~. . . ~~ i~'I?~E 53'~'I"10,'~ Nor. 4 1%IR~ 57' ~97CJ±~/ NL'. 4 }'.`1ZYC tr~n4t SCNAI e'U P. cr' txw`+~"eRS ~ _~_._ _ ____ _, ____ _ ___ DR__E_ _W_ _ _ STR_E_ E_ T ~ .....__..,A';:NA~7 Pn1+EhiENT _..,_._~.R S~i}_._.. _. ..~.__.. .._.____. N }//I i j `.~, X t '~a;enn.iea~~ e~uw,riae s r .s..snw d 'af~ija~o~i~i us ~~~~ PI~~P I I 1 A~~~ 1 ~ 2005 PI.ANhliVG & CE`Jclvr'^. ~-!v i SACS PRE11~um ^E~lT BEY :71011 e ORIGINAL E.ree~w ~ra~~ mac. ~~.~uns io eE sEEEaEOa. owEa~ n+n ottaumE EKES ~Ull'J 'J.6F DiiPt~~~EEE ~ j i NOTE: 1. ALL SINAGE UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT P1E1~WlY t01RH HEYA710N e WF; *Laxt', ~yi:1.LYf Fl'.Y V v PRELr1AR7 MOR7N BEYA710N PRBI~IART EAlT BEYA71011 )_ Q J~ W~ 3 3 2Q U U a 0 ~o Or 4p ~ a ~n ~ p~ n o W~ a ~ o o psi ~ o ~ 8 ,; A~ 1 ~ 0~ ~ n ;v ~~ 9tl 1 9~ 1 M ~~ i ~0 i~ ~I ~ ~~ 'I ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ iV ~r ~. ~~ . • 11'Iy ,~~' 0~ _~ I I I I I 1~(~ I J~ I `/ IJ s~ 1~ ~ ~ 4• ~ I ~O Y J W J ~ ~ 1~J ~ t1 ~ wl ~~ .~, {gtW1 7 Q r^la ~ ~~J aQ N a I I m ~ m ~ e l m _~ y Q~ e o ® a+ ~ r FIR ~v e 9~ A/C~O EX. 1-STORYBLDG. O G ST RA E qR ~ ~~~ F F B i~'ts F.F. EL.=71.18' 1,663 S.F. EX. CONC WALK EX. ASPHALT (RESURFACE) a. RCP ~ o CURB INLET ' y0p yp0 yp -~ TOP=69.72 E/P=68.33' I Ex CaLC wALx THROAT=69.00' INV.(YI~=64.73' m0E W PAVOE7IT r ~- ~ I ORIGINAL _ _ _ .~._ _ STREET _ -~ DREW _ _ _ A~HALT PAVEMENT S.R 590 OF . ~ ~ FIR r l yp0 caMc POSE SIGNAL POLE I (4' DIALE7Et) a oac wAUt ;, ! , ~`~~~~ 1 ~ ~0~ ~ ~ '.J pp~~ ,,A/~1~,!L i_J TLt11~ ~. Y LL:v ~` . ~~ i SVCS ORIGINAL. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 4 Comprehensive Infill Project ~~ ~ ~ _y D U PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street ~~ 11 ~ 7 ~~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: __ ~:~i-~~ ~.~, ,- - . ,. _ t J~,; To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.3' to pavement, 10.5' to building, (south) from 25' to 11.2' to parking and 50' to building and (east) from 25' to 18' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. A reduction to parking from 38 required spaces to 31 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The development will be in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The existing building which is to remain is a one-story building which is similar to surround properties. There is no bulk to the building and the coverage, density and character are all in likeness to surrounding parcels. If the proposed development was not on three fronts, the project could have probably been designed.with no deviations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder adjacent land and building nor impair values. The existing building will be remaining, an addition being added to the building and site improvements being made. This will only increase surrounding values. 3. No health or safety issues arise from this project. More than anything, it has increased the safety. Existing trailers which were used for storage are being removed and site improvements are being made. 4. No additional traffic will be at the site. All ingress and egresses are being maintained except for upgrades. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character. All the surrounding parcels are retail, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. 6. No adverse effects will be made to adjacent properties. The north of the property abuts residential, but we will be placing a 6' landscaped fence along the property line as to further buffer the residences. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1. The property is impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the property being surrounded by three streets, with 25' setbacks, this is impossible. There would be no room for building. i • ORIGINAL 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales,are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All - compatible with the proposed project. S. Other suitable sites may be available throughout the City of Clearwater, but the owner has been at this location for approximately 10 years and only wished to expand his operation so other sites were not practical. 6. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with.. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 7. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, .this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 8. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on three front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 2S' setbacks on three sides, this would take almost SO% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is - not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. 9. Off-street parking is being provided for the site. By code 4-S spaces are required for retail. By these calculations, we should be required to have 38 parking spaces our site is short 7 parking spaces. Included in our application is a parking demand study. Prior to the applicant redeveloping, he had approximately 10 -1 S parking spaces for 7,925 square feet of building. There has never been a day when all parking spaces were occupied. The addition to the property is 1,663 square feet of space, 1,100 square feet for storage. Even though we are shy 7 spaces, we still do not feel on- street parking will take place. The parking calculations were based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. No consideration was taken into account for the storage square footage. This would not account for an additional need of parking spaces. The, only staff accessing storage would be for the ones already accounted for under actual retail space. 10. N/A p ~ Ica ~~ ~ C=1 f ~~ ~~;~ A ~~ i~ ,116 Q ~ ~~5 1 ~ : ~ ~..a~novu6tUt~c F J~'C.C` ~ ~ ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.. b Residential Infill Project O (~ PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup ~ 1770 Drew Street ~~`~~ ~ 1 ~~5 ~ PLANNING & DEVr~i t_it'r,~~i~~T SVC~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.3' to pavement, 10.5' to building, (south) from 25' to 11,2' to parking and 50' to building and (east) from 25' to 18' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. Reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 38 spaces to 31 spaces. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 4. The applicant has had this business in the same location for the past 10 years. It sits on the corners of Drew, Mars and Keene Road and the rear of the building (north) abuts single-family residential homes. All other surround parcels are commercial and institutional. The building itself is to remain. Currently there are two trailers on site which are in code violation. These trailers will be removed and an addition will be placed on the west side of the building and additional parking to be provided to the north. 2. The proposed development is consistent with other commercial developments surrounding this parcel. 3. The heath and safety of persons residang or working in the surrounding area will be affected. The existing use of the business is not changing, only expanding to better serve its clients. 4. Drew Street and Keene are two major roads surrounding the proposed development. The existing curb cut on Drew Street will remain. There are currently two curb cuts on Mars, these will be moveda little further north to further from the intersection of Mars and Drew. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Drew Street is zoned commercial. The surrounding parcels consist of a cleaners, repair shop, florist, auto mechanics, etc. 6. The proposed development is being improved visually. The trailers will be removed fronn the site, the existing building will have a new face lift and remodeling will be taking place inside. Hours of operation will not change, Monday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (approximate). RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The proposed development is impractical without deviations. The owner has purchased the lot to the north of his existing building for additional parking to ~ ~ORI6INAL bring the building up to code. Although we are still short parking spaces per code, we have attached a traffic analysis supporting that the parking supplied is more than adequate for this retail store. The required number of parking spaces based on the square footage of the building is 38 (this is based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The current building, 7,925 square feet only provided approximately 10-15 parking spaces for the last 10 years of business. The owner has contended that he has never had every parking space occupied. Currently, we are adding 1668 square feet to be the building and approximately 1100 is for storage. We are adding an additional 23 spaces to the site for approximately 500 square feet of additional square footage. 2. • ~'Ve do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. S. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 6. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 7. loTo lot width is being requested, being our property is located on three front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on three sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building wi0 not be raised and ofd street parking is being eliminated. ~~~~~~C~ E~ s ~ . July 7, 2005 Mr. Michael Reynolds Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street (Chainwheel Drive) Dear Mr. Reynolds: CIVIL o • ~ ~ ~ • ~' • ~ANDOOR ATION o Listed below is our response to the Letter of Incompleteness in regards to the above case. 1. We have revised our narrative which will be replaced with the current narrative attached to our Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill Applications. In the opening paragraph for our request, we have requested a reduction to parking from 38 spaces (4 per thousand square feet) to 31 spaces. Code requires 4-5 per thousand square feet. Calculated on the 4 per thousand equals 38 spaces, calculated at 5 per thousand equals 48 spaces. The current property is 7,925 square feet with approximately at the most 15 parking spaces. We are proposing to add and addition to the site in the amount of 1,663 square feet. Approximately 1,100 square feet of the 1,663 square feet is for storage. The owner contends there have never been all spaces occupied. The additional 23 spaces to the site is a welcomed addition, but due to existing building not being demolished and reconstructed, it is difficult to add the additional 7 spaces required by code. If any additional information is required, please do not hesitate to call. A. Willi Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECHQMINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 r°~ ,;~ ~E p 7 1005 " _ i I~ • ~PPUC~atiu ~~'Z ~T ~~.., :~ Planning Department ,~', 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 :: Telephone:727-562-4567 ~~ Fax:727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~ -_ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) --PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAM MAILING ADDRESS~~~~ ~i~~t__„~ Vii. ~_~~~[~u~ cc~v _~-~__~_~~~___-_--___-_~ '/ // ,/ PHONE NUMBER: ~7 -!~_"5!Z f~Q~~ ~-___-____ FAX NUMBER: ~ ~ r ~7!`_~~ + ~iO~_-___-___--_- PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION O R, ~ ~ N ~i L Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STREET ADDRESS of subject TION: (Code Section 4-202.A) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~~~}~ ~__ ~~~rYlll>' ~.1 _L~EL~LLiL~/;,.~L___-___ (if not listed here please n to the location o this docnum~en~tin the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: ,f - Z ~-L~- ~~lt!-~s1-=~Q1~------------------------------ PARCEL SIZE: _-1-~~ L~ = -__~ 1 _ ____________ --__--_-_ (acres, square feet) ~ ~ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S) f~~~~,SJ`-~'~L~r,C~_~ _/f~ ~_~1~-~ ~L~~1~'~i -- \ (number of)dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) ` c / / DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):~..Jr~~1~SGl~_~c.L~ ~~~f1~1_~-Lt--___ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required -_._._~ 4. I li Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development or p~e~s~py~a~n 2005- City of Clea a r -!~ [VI 'FJi1 ~~1NING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI°V OF CLEARWATER CASE #:~ ~JJ'' DATE RE EIVED: ______________ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ~__ ATLAS PAGE #: ____________ ZONING DISTRICT: ____________~, LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ___ SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: __ ______ SOUTH: --------------- WEST: ----------------- EAST: --_ PHONE NUMBER:-Z-7 _7`~~ -Z~~_ ~___-____ FAX NUMBER: ~.~_~-_'Y ~Sp- c~ ~~~___-__--_-__ CELL NUMBER: ~~_ ~~~_ Q~___-'E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~J~~--~C ~~ ~~,5'Ptile~ C7 , ~!%~' • • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ____ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C-./PROOF OF OWNERSHIP:~(Code Section 4-202.A.5) V - ~ - V I - v i ~ t.. id SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see. page 6) D/ WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Q" Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. -- - - --------------------------------------- -------- ----------~~~ fit. --~~-~-~ --~- ------------------------------------- 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. --------------- ------------------------------ ------ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. - -- - - - 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. --------------------------------------- ------- -------------------------------------------- ---~~=--~ _~ d-_ ~~~--- ~ --=---------- -- ----- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for.development. ---------------------------- -----~~~ ---.~~ ~ ~~---~~~.~s--~----~ ----------- ------- ------ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ----------------------- - - ------ ----- ------------- ------ -- ----~~_~~~ ~Ec ~ - ~~=~ ~ ----~------------------------------ __. ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------r--=--=----------------- . ~.~.s-.. 7r•, . provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJEOT CRI I as a lica 7e - _~ ain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical witho t de i ins fro'°m'~t~fle~se~'i LUhUi~ and development standards. a ----------------------------------------- ---~~~- ,~~~~~-~~~,~ ~--~-__-__-____ ~____ PLANNING-& DEVELOPME SERVICES +e 0 F Ii k l r T Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~ ~ ~ N A L ' • 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ---------------------------------------- ------- --------- 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ---------------------------------- - - --------------------------- ------~z~ __~~5~1/_---~~C~-~-~ -_~~_ -------------------------------- 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. -------------- -------------------------------------------- - 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - ----------~~---~-~s ~ ~--~~~~. ~--~? --------------------------- 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. -------- -------------------------------------- -- -- -------------------- - --~~~ 2~ ~ ~ ~~ _-~2~~~L -~ --------------------------------- 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ----------------------------- - - 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. ,------~ 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Use separate sheets as necessary. of A icle 3. (a§fa`ppl~a~e)~005 4 f L._._-__...~__..__ ------------------------(-~----------,-~--/------------ - -Pt~Rft~ttN~$ Q€~€tbPMENT -----`~~ ~~1L~=`--`~ -~~C 7~c ~r~-- ~ -------------------- S E R V I_C ES _ ' Cf'Y pF CL.EARWATER ~--- - - - ORIGINAL Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater` ~ ~ E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involy addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with th City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption t this requirement. / If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ORIGIN ! i ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: __ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the ity manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^~\~EOPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL ` .(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ~__ stormwater plan as noted above is included _____ stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) p~IGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; t1~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; l9' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ~~ .PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior _ to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering prir)ciples. ThP Endings oftJie study yyill be used in determining whetjier or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; - _. ~~RADING PLAN, as applicable; (~IP PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); r....-._.__._ OF RECORDED PLAT, as ~~`~ G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ° ~ t~ U t~ ~ _U ~ i SITE PLAN with the following information (riot to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ _ All dimensions; ~ rr''C[ ~ 2~UJ ~ __ North arrow; , ___ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ; ~ ~ ___ Location map; T ` ___ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; PL ANNING & DEVELOPMENT ___ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; SERVICES __ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; __ All required setbacks; CI'V.OF CLEARWATER ___ All existing and proposed points of access, ~- ----- ------ ___ All required sight triangles; ___ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; O RI GI N L Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; , Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ • _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ___ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and O ~ I ___ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. N n i SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: H I __ Land area in square feet and acres; _ _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; __ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; __ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and ___ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: __ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ___ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ___ Streets and drives (dimensioned); ___ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ___ Structural overhangs; __ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H./LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Q' LANDSCAPE PLAN: ___ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; __ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ___ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; __ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; __ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; __ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ___ Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ~~~~ . COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with ~~ prehensive __ Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code wi n t be met. ~ ~~ ~ ~ I I [ ~~ ~~ ~~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C!'~' OF CLEARWATER Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater. ORIGINAL I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part - /of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. 4X BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; EDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 YZ X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. _ - . J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. , All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC.IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Iriclude if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway ~jl\\egs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ,v1C- Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FO'R~-~ ~ T ~~~~T,U,DY - ~ ' AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITT~f~ I I~IC' ~~1~,A~ Y OCCUR. i ~ V~ _ ~~ff ~ ' If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration at (727) 562-4750. ~__~ L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersi ed, acknowledge that all representations made in this applicaf n ar true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authori a Ci ;representatives to visit and photograph the property descri ed in is application. of dAQperty ovelfer or DOREEN A. WILLIAItyts MV COMMISSION #t DD 155802 1.gpp3.NOTAHY FL Notary Service 8 Bonding, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNT Severn 1tq and subscribed uced commission expires: SERVICES CI'Y OF CLEARWATER before a this li v day of 20~ to me and/or by who is personally known has -------------------- as Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwat~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\1 ~ i .s 11/18/2004 11.97 i 274036 i~IORTHSIIIE EhJ~CS ~~D PAGE 02/02 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION N0V 2 2 2004 This letter will setve as authorization for )EIoush Ghovaee with Northgide Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent fir, and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits Q (~` ~ { /~ i and approvals far the construction on the property generally located at O I \ I V I I V 0"'1 L 1~1 © ~ ~'e-~,' ~~ r~ e'~ ,lying within ~ -~ ~ a' S County, State of 1- ~ v < < ~c ,_. Signature of ~~ o m c;9 s ~~e s~~ . Print Name of Property Owner b ~f ~..~ ~ lei ~7~ ~ ~~ ~- ~~ 77. Address of Property Owner Telephone Number a CitylStatef2ip Code State of ~~~h p The foregoing instrurnant was acknowledge before me this day County of ~1-~u-WS of ev~'~iid~ ~ `~by~('NOt`~wt Q~yP , as who is personally known to me or who has produced l^L QP1 Vra~S as identification and who did (did not) take an oath, ;~ti'~~Py~;: Margaret E Reeves +.: #- MY COMMISSION # DD344640 EXPIRES ~~~ August 8, Z ~~~_; ~;;°P'~ BONDEDTHRUTROYFANJI S NOtary Public (Signal ) ,' , Gommission # (SEAL ABOVE) ` 1~~~~~~ R'~y~Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) ORIGINAL ., ~~~~~~ , L~/ i JUN 2 7 2005 6 i '~~' l-..~...~...~.,.._ I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _ CI`Y OF CLEARWATER e Calculations using the most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 6th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report DescriptionATE Code ,Units Expected Units Expected Daily Trips PM Peak Trips. - Totat PM In PM Out Truck Terminal 030 Acres General Li ht Industrial 110 TSF Gross Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross . Not Available Sin Ie Famil Homes 210 DU A artments 220 DU Mobile Home Park 240 DU Retirement Communi 250 DU Not Available All Suites Hotel 311 Occ.Room Motel 320 OCC.ROOm Marina . 420 Berths Health Club 493 TSF Gross Not Available Church 560 TSF Gross Da care Center 565 TSF Gross General Office 710 TSF Gross Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross Buildin Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross S ecial Retail Center 814 TSF Gross 9,6 390 25 11 14 Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Availabl Not Available Sho in Center 820 TSF Gross Quality Restaurant 831 TSF Gross Hi h Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 832 TSF Gross Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 833 TSF Gross Not Available Fast Food with Drive Thru 834 TSF Gross Drive Thru Onl 835 TSF Gross Not Available Service Station 844 Fuel. Position Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 845 Fuel Position Tire Store 848 Service Ba Su ermarket 850 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt 0 en 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt O en 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Nat Available Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pum s 853 TSF Gross Discount Club 861 TSF Gross Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross Walk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross Drive-In Bank 912 Driveln Windows Y:\PublicWgency Apps\FDOT\[tripcal8.xls]Calculations -- 22aJua_-05~ Chainwheel Drive 0 t ~ -- Z ~ ,.. .. z ~~~, z~~ o n~QO N ll u U r ~ p (~ m f "~ ~ -.-~ ~ ' ~~ o ' C ~ D ~ ~, ~~ .~ ~ m ~_..~----j ~ ~-°~~~ D .~_ . 390 25 71 74 ..Lunch Hour Traffic; Tdtal In Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 »»»> No calculations but studies show'Lunch Peak 146-064 two way trips Also see a non ITE Method in tab titled "Gas and Conv.Mk" C~ i - • • FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT: Thomas & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zozung district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 25' to 8.3' to pavement, 10.5' to building, (south) from 25' to 11.2' to parking and 50' to building and (east) from 25' to 18' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The development will be in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The existing building which is to remain is a one-story building which is similaz to surround properties. There is no bulk to the building and the coverage, density and character are all in likeness to surrounding parcels. if the proposed development was not on three fronts, the project could have probably been designed with no deviations. 2. The proposed development will not hinder adjacent land and building nor impair values. The existing building will be remaining, an addition being added to the building and site improvements being made. This will only increase surrounding values. 3. No health or safety issues arise from this project. More than anything, it has increased the safety. Existing trailers which were used for storage are being removed and site improvements are being made. 4. No additional traffic will be at the site. All ingress and egresses are being maintained except for upgrades. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character. All the surrounding parcels are retail, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. 6. No adverse effects will be made to adjacent properties. The north of the property abuts residential, but we will be placing a 6' landscaped fence along the property line as to further buffer the residences. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1. The property is impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and ~......_. development standards. Due to the property being surrounded by three streets, with b >~s, this is impossible. There would be no room for building. ~. ~ ~ e 1`,abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is _surrn d b three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property I JUN 2 7 2005 ; ~ ~ ~ _. _. ~-~ ORI PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ~ i N A L SERVICES i ~ ~ is being improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses within this project aze compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. Other suitable sites may be available throughout the City of Clearwater, but the owner has been at this location for approximately 10 years and only wished to expand his operation so other sites were not practical. 6. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the pazcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mazs, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 7. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community chazacter of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 8. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on three front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on three sides, this would take almost 50°l0 of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off- street parking is being eliminated. 9. Off-street parking is being provided for the site. By code, 4-S spaces are required for retail. By these calculations, we should be required to have 38 parking spaces, our site is short 7 pazking spaces. Included in our application is a parking demand study. Prior to the applicant redeveloping, he had approximately 10 -15 parking spaces for '7,925 square feet of building. 'T'here has never been a day when all pazking spaces were full. We aze only adding an additional 1,663 squaze feet of space, 1,100 square feet for storage. Even though we are shy 7 spaces, we still do not feel on-street parking will take place. 10. N/A r ~.. _._._ -- _ _ _ __._ -- ~ ~~C~~~~ ~Q _ 1 ~u~ 7 ~ ii 2 2005 ~ ~~ PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES j GI-Y OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL ~'t~U~~~ 1o~r ~- ~ ~ Planning Department CASE #: _________ ___ __ ~~?~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue DATE RECEIVED: __________ Clearwater, Florida 33756 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ________ k.. _ - Telephone:727-562-4567 ~~_ „~ ~ ,~- ~ . _-' Fax: 727-562-4865 ~ ATLAS PAGE #: _____________ ZONING DISTRICT: ------------ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: __ ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including NORTH: _-_---_-- 1)collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SOUTH: __-_____----_ WEST: ------------------- ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~ _ EAST: __-___-____-___-___ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION .~,~.xesidential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) +'1r` ---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ~~D1x~_~1~5~'~.. __-_-___-_ -- ----------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS:~Z S.P _~~~_ r7__~ L~~__~'~~-_~ 7 ~~ ___-___-_-- PHONE NUMBER:~~ 7 ? 7_Z_.~ s.z~ ~ -_-____ FAX NUMBER: _~~_~~` ~__1!l,[i~~ __-____-_--_____ PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~~~r)'~--L- ~/l`~~~~ ~~~sS~~ ---------------------- (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) ----------- ----------------- -- - ------------------------------ AGENT NAME~'~~'[((~~-b{~~,I~~JL~~r- ~L~~~~~~~F_,CL~1sL~?-~~C ~~T_ ~~~~ --- MAILING ADDRESS'~~_Q.L_-CL~f1~1~ ~C._ ~yQ~__~~~_~-L~,,__~G __ 337 ZS ___ PHONE NUMBER: ~7 _~~ ~~/;~¢_~ ___-____ FAX NUMBER: _ /_~ ~___~7 ~P _~~ ~ ~,p-____-___- CELL NUMBER: /e~ 7 - `~C~~__ Q 7~-------- E-MAIL ADDRESSJt\C~~~~-~-fit,! ~~~~~2_~ DCl'v B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFO MATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site:l~~~ _-_/L~~ _~ t~ ~_,~~~2~!!~ ~L~ --~- ~ ----------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~~ __, a' ~ ___~„~~~(.c~~_~~j ~ ~~__--_-___-____-__-____ (if not listed here please~9ote the location fthis document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: ~L=-,?~_n~J~, - y~c ~~i0__(~C~/_~~L~_-____-_ PARCEL SIZE: --t-`='~ _!~-'~ ~1 ---- / - °?~5~~--~1----------------------------- (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S~~12,~C,T--~Q~ --w~=~~~~~~-1yV~,<---------- f"=-' - -_. _ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms orsquare footage of nonresidential use) v -- ,--_ -~ ~,.„ - t ----- A ach , t and be specific when identi 'ink , e{reque t (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) f -----I PI.A SERVIC~~z,P 'I of 7~V L _____ c;i:v (~F CLEARWgTc;? ~ ~ ~ K I ~ ~ IV rf`1 L e f DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVI SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ____ NO ____ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C/PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ----------------------------------- - -------------- 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ---------------- - ----------------------------------- ----- ----------------- 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ------------------- ------ -- ---------------------------------- - ----- 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. --------------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- --------~---~ C~~~ __~~~~.~_ ~ __~~_------------------------------ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. -- --------------------- -------- ----------------------------------= - f~: _ -----_._.__ _. _ _ _... . D U ~~ ------~ ? I JUN 2 7 2005 P!-~tNNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !' ~ ~ ~ "" ~--_._ CI`Y OF CLEARRAIaE'72-~ 7 -Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater __ a • • ^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. ------------------------------------ - - - ------ --------- ------------------- ~~-~- --GCS=c `-~-~-----~~~! ~~~ ~---------------- 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) -- -------- --------------- - --_- --- --------------------------------- ,,/J~~ (,I , /-- - - ----- 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. --------/ - - 1~---~~~ /J. ~ ----X51_-------------------------- 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. - - ----------------------- --- ---------------------------------- - 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. - - - - -- -------------- ------- - ------ 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. -------------------- - - -- - ----------- -------------------- 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ------------- -- - ------------- t`- --~~ • ~C~~0~~ ~~~~ :: ~ JUN Z 7 Z~05 • i_..___... _..~,~_ _.-~W. • 0~ I G I N A Lw PIANNIN~ 8, (JEVEt~OPMENT SERVICES -' ~` flt= Cl_~Q,R4Pi+ar~e~3,.yof 7 -Flexile Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~.. _....:_.~ - J FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMEN'~ APPLICATION Residential InfiU Project ~ ~ L'~~~ ~,hz, ~_ PROJECT: Thoma"s & Dorothy Jessup 1770 Drew Street DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To construction non-residential off-street parking in the MDR zoning district which is contiguous with an existing one-story bicycle sales and repair shop. A reduction to the front setback (west) from 2S' to 8.3' to pavement, i0.5' to building, (south) from 25' to 11.2' to parking and 50' to building and (east) from 2S' to 18' to building. A request for a height increase fora 6' fence which abuts residential housing instead of a 4' fence and landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant has had this business in the same location for the past 10 years. It sits on the corners of Drew, Mars and Keene Road and the rear of the building (north) abuts single-family residential homes. All other surround parcels are commercial and institutional. The building itself is to remain. Currently there are two trailers on site which are in code violation. These trailers will be removed and an addition will be placed on the west side of the building and additional parking to be provided to the north. 2. The proposed development is consistent with other commercial developments surrounding this parcel. 3. The heath and safety of persons residing or working in the surrounding area will be affected. The existing use of the business is not changing, only expanding to better serve its clients. 4. Drew Street and Keene are two major roads surrounding the proposed development. The existing curb cut on Drew Street will remain. There are currently two curb cut on Mars, these will be move a little further north to further from the intersection of Mars and Drew. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Drew Street is zoned commercial. The surround parcels consist of a cleaners, repair shop, florist, auto mechanics, etc. 6. The proposed development is being improved visually. The trailers will be removed from the site, the existing building will have a new face lift and remodeling will be taking place inside. Hours of operation will not change, Monday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. unti16:00 p.m. (approximate}. RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA bring 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI"`! OF CLEARWATER development is impractical without deviations. The owner has lot to the north of his existing building for additional parking to ding up to code. Although we are still short parking spaces per ORIGINAL ~ ~i ~ ~ code, we have attached a traffic analysis supporting that the parking supplied is more than adequate for this retail store. 2. We do not feel abutting properties fair market values will decrease. The property is surrounded by three streets with only the north side abutting residential. The property is beinng improved from its current condition. The current fair market value of this property per the Property Appraiser's office is approximately $342,000.00. The proposed value of the site with improvements should be approximately $500,000.00. 3. The current zoning for this property is commercial, with the north side of the property zoned MDR. Retail sales are permitted in the commercial zoning and off-street parking• is permitted in MDR. 4. The uses withiw this project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The property is surrounded by convenience stores, gas stations, repair shops and retailers. All compatible with the proposed project. 5. By improving the existing building, the immediate vicinity of the parcel will be upgraded. The building will have a face lift, trailers will be removed from the site and new and additional parking will be provided. Being on the corner of Keene, Drew and Mars, we really don't have much to compete with. A few of the businesses on adjacent properties are dilapidating and unkempt. This will be an improvement for this corner. 6. Anytime you can make site improvements to existing buildings, this immediately enhances the community character of the immediate facility and Clearwater as a whole. More buildings need to be better maintained and improved periodically so the City does not have eye sores when driving through. 7. No lot width is being requested, being our property is located on three front setbacks, it is almost impossible to adhere to 25' setbacks on three sides, this would take almost 50% of the property and leave nothing to building on, the proposed development is not asking for any increase in height. The existing building will not be raised and off-street parking is being eliminated. ---, r...._... __--__. --- - r ; ~ ---~ . ~ _N N ~~ JU 7 005 2 2 `~ ~________._______J PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Cf`Y OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL i __ _ i ~_ _ _ _ _,~MARS _ AVENUE, ,,..~~ _ _ _ _ _ __ ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~/ v V J ~ J 1~~1 _/ v ~ ~ ` FDGE OF PAVF~IEIlT ~ 7' CURB BACK OF CURB I ~ p~ ~ p~ ~ ON'• ~ 7Cl11D' m ~ ~. ~~_ ~~ r ~ ..~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~Ib '~ n`' :~~ f ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~I~ ~~ _ _ l l ~ ~~ ~~ ~ti~ { (~' ~y ~ ha°y ~ )1 ~. r( __._.I ~ ~~jI ~, ~ l~ 0o Cq '" tr -~ ~ ( L T ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ .. -- ~.- :.W.•.•:.~:. V........ ~ ~~ Ng0'p' ?2RAD' ~ m) , r ~ r cam wAUC ~ ^ ^ ~` ~- L- ~ CO~tJC~ O~ C ll~~ Z ~ ~ SYo ^' ~ $$ QyyQ 7 'F' CURB EDGE OF.PAVEMENT ~' ~ -~ < 'F~ ~e3 ~~ ~ ~ m ° o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~. y,/ t~ ~~ ~,ti ~ ~w u ar ~~ r A 7~~ » ~< ~ n a a- o~ v ! ~d ~ j ~d art ~ Es g ; ' a~ 8 d o ~ ~~ ~o W °'d ~ 9 m~ 0 0~ b ~D D ~' D ~m ~~ 0 o~ m 1.r+~.. ~Nhdawd~ -~t~~.s '~ 1~01~ 6'~l I7~ H~11105 ( rnm ~ao~.) ~ tea. ~~~ ~`' r ,n .. ~~l( ~,~~~~~ x'11 ~ . ~. 3~ ~ ~; ~,M ~ ! .• r :~.. t ~t . ,, ~ ~_ ~, ,., :~~.r S3~Ina3S 1N?~9dOl3llaQ'8 SNINN~fId ~.. ~ r 'y,~ ~ ~CZZ ~"~I`l~l,~~)I~I~, n r n.t w ~~~ ~• s~_'~" ~ fr~11 ~ a.. ` }. ~ w ~ ~. t ~ n~, «ti 7 :: ,;,1, ',~ ..:_ -,~ {t:, *`LP= 9~ , ~~~'~~ .~., ~ ., `. ~ ~ ~. '~ . ~' r ~ ~ ~ ' ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ _- M ~ ~or~~~oc~ E~~ . LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: June 22, 2005 To: ~ Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: C:hainwheel Drive NES Proj# 0470 We Transmit: X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered CIVIL o LAND PLANNING c ENVIRONMENTAL ~ TRANSPORTATION e X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Date Description 15 Civil &Landsca e Drawings (5 sheets) 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landsca e Plan 15 _.~ .Flex Development and Comprehensive .Lnfill Application 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys (1 signed and sealed) 15 Stormwater Re ort & Narrative (1 signed and sealed) 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11"Building Elevations 1 Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings 1 Check #053615 for $1,20. Comments: For Design Review Committee for 7/1/OS deadline. Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: Pe z i~ ~ ~ O U L~ RG A. a~ s ~ f By: ~ JUN 2 7 2005 ~ ~ ~ ~ 601 CLEVELAND i ,a~r~, rojectDirector ~ I CLEARWATER, FL ~~3 - j°-~- r NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM p ! ~ ~~ -•-~ ' NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM O R ~ V !NHL P~`NNING & DEVELOPMENT 1 V SERVICES i 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 _ a C!",~' C`r C;LrAR`tNAT.%=5 ~~~~~0~ E~ ~~. CIVIL o LAND PLANNING c ENVIRONMENTAL ~ TRANSPORTATION ~ STORMWATER REPORT FOR: CHAINWHEEL DRIVE PROJECT ~~rv' ~~ .-c.i ~~ ~i s ~~ JUN 2 7 2005 , ~ ~ ~_.. _.....,.._,..._..,J ~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI'Y OF CLEARWATEF~ ORIGINAL 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 ~ p~ ~: ~...., • • (1_ ~ r r'J~~ .. » - 4cr..~ .._ m ~n l~.~o~l, E-:~~74~31 .~ • ~y ~~~~~~~~ ~'b, }~ Q o ~~I/~-~f°^~ June 2005 Project No. 0470 -~• i CHAINWHEEL DRIVE STORMWATER NARRATIVE Project consists of an existing building and parking spaces with new asphalt parking in the rear. The existing drainage from the existing building and parking will continue to drain to the street. The new asphalt and new building addition will drain into the new retention pond. The new retention pond is designed for 25 year storm with %2" water quality. The pond will outfall into Drew Street. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Drainage Area = 12,600 S.F. 9,340 X 0.95 = 8,778 3,360 X 0.2 = 672 12,600 9,450 C = 0.75 Volume Required = 2,010 C.F. (0.75 - 0.2) X 0.29 X 3.5 X 3,600 = 2,009.7 VOLUME PROVIDED = 2;750 C.F. at 1' depth ~. ~. __. ~_____. ~ __~ D f~ . ~ ~~ JUN 2 7 2005 ~ I" ~~ a ~ ~...____._...._.._,._ . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES i _ +- Cf'V O~ CLEARWATER 'Ei10~.:1~' NEW RETENTION VAULT TOP EL. 70.2 BOT. EL. 69.0 ~~ t. "~!ri ~ ~ r ~ 3' - t ~~z m ® ;~ Xi^ ~ I I ' `.•t ~ I I ~_ J ~~~~ - - ~y ` E O I ~tis~`y ^y rz' o m 12 o .n:~2i a E ~ ~~ +~ W .-f ~~°~,~ w~}~--~ ~E~ ~~~ ' "t r., I a t E~ ~~~ ~ ~,~ ~- E r .~ ~ r ~..~• 1 e~ E 1,~ ~° t,~_J t.. ~~ ~f _ I~D~~d'W i9ABl fF1 ~~ ,,>. ,.-£ ice, tom,. ~ ~ ~,• , t I I '/ s ~s. `~ ~ ~t~ , 101 $ tU I i ~ti ~ I~~I s I FX. DOOR 7'O RE14UN ~ ~:-;. ,1{Its} !t.?c; !YEtiV J e f a, t p,, ORAGE LR/ s ; . EL. 71.18 ~:~ t ~ f ~.., r i ~~~~ ~_t ~ 9 0 ~~ ~ B L ~~ ~~ ~" i I' 1 ' ~ V f~-~~ .a ~ r r~ i ~i ~: I ~~ ~ E i` 'I E '~ ~f s ' ~~ C 1~° ~~ I a ~! f `4 f ij ?j ,f .~ i. ~ •~s _ ~ ~` `~`~ ~' 24' r9' IB' E ~ i ; r sw e E I ~^5 fie' Ncn_ ~ WNEEL STOP N ~ ~ i ~tJ`a„~.'~7,. ""-=.: CURS tttLE'I'~ r- .-_-_- •~ ~1C7r+a8~.72• ~ -... ».-« ................-. __... { ~ £K fFitfv V1N.N /~ ~~f7=f5~.3'/` ~ i;Y. C.`k:L YIAiX 1~~ '/'` '..."_..........~..'-""r,/r tritma7..5s r7~' E - -~ ~ =.,:m_'~." ~:~.~::»~'~. ~ i~3"n.~':f~L~i ... . _.._». ~._____...._.~_ _-___..__ .~ _ ~ --°'~..~ ••' 13dY.(ti?)=$4.73' . °_.7 •.• ~ ~ •`"'.-_ mc[-na' w~xq£*r '_ V ~~ ~ 2 7 200, . ` ~. DREW _ STREET _ ~ ~_ ~~~~-~~~~_. _ ___ _ ~_ _. _____. W __._~_L.. __ __ _ _.w. __._., .,~__ __ _ ~ _ ~s~~€~~.r ~av~~nE~w». ~..R ~~SJ f'~_ _ & DEVELOPMENT - SERVICES ' ?E CLEARWATER " ~` r.1 i t0 3v C ~~ V yS~ Orr %~ d Y~ ~~;` ~~. ~~ ~~ ORIGINAL '~~ ~~C~~~' fl i wxvaras PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !`i-„ OF CLEARWATER I~Yl1~ R m L .~,~ ~,~ 8 PRB~IAIIY NOR7N BE11A710N e ~~:~ BI D dl1.NW FG6'D$(V' l~7 WL V:^.'.G t;Y~LL'f Fl'li ~. PIIB.rIMY EAdT BEYA710N 3 c .~ r U d ~~ ~ wl w ~4 fA fE u~ 5 ~ ;, ~ ~ J~ ~s Y °~r ~~ `- ~~~, Parccl ID Number. 11/29/15/9~~6/000/0010 Grautec ~1 TIN: Grantee #2 TIN: Wa~~°anty Deed ~'~,~~~` , This Indenture, Made this 4 th day of January, l9 9 5 A.D. , Eetwween ROBERT E. P4EYER and MARTHA E. MEYER, his wife, of the County of PIIQELIIAS , State of Florida , ~Y'antOrS, and THOMAS JESSUI' and DOROTHY J. JESSUP, husband and wife wltoseaadressis:1805 Drew Street, CLEARWATER, Florida 34625 of the County of PINELLAS ~ State of Florida ,grantees. Witnesseth that the GRANTORS, For and in consideration of the cunt of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ _. TEN ~ r1o/1a o ~ $10.0 0 ~ - _. - - - - - - - -' UOLI..ARS, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTORS in hand paid by GRANTEES, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEES and GRANTEES' heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of PINELIa~S State of ~' IOI.Id1 to wit: ' Lots 1 and 2, WOODMERE HEIGHTS, according to the Plat thereof on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and r Pinellas County, Florida recorded in Plat Boole 45, page 45, ~~ ~~co~o~R:. f~iC G'~~,said land situate, lying and being.in Pinellas County, Florida. ~S Stxb3ect to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, I~T -'~'~'t"any, and taxes subsequent to 1994.., f~/C ______~ _.. (~Ef1T _____ FE~a .__._____..._ sir- ~.__..~~ ~'E!/ ____~_ .,., ~ Pd. lark S 1ltanai~te Tax f;zr(~an F t)o ak• C rk, Plnellac Cod by Qaputy C ~~1. ~_ J,~...'~ , '.. L_.. `3 i.. ~,"~ Itt`.~ 3;;.'•'., :_, 3;.girl>• _• lil•....1.+ i_' ~ 1 .. _ s..i~i:l~, ~il`'s i :, ...i`li1~:.. aria ~~,_? i}t':~. ~.~~?.. .. t t. I:. L .. '3' y L ~I and the grantors do hereity fully wanant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons witontsoever. IIl ~htne$S `~herelDi~, the. grantors have hereunto set their hander@nd. seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in oun• presence: ) (Seal) Printed Name e ~j ~-~s-C~~ ~~~~~ ROBERT E . .MEYER W~S aS ~ BOth P.O. Address 2516 Roberta Sheet, LARGO, FI, 34641 Printed Name e ~ ,~ '~„/ ~"'~fy MARTHA E , MEYER ~ (Seal) Tf~'--±=T ASS 'S ~•n RO~~•~~ P.O. r~Jcirc~a 252E I:obcrta Strct, i.ARt;tJ, PL 34ti41 STATE ~E Florida ~®~T1~i ~' ~~ F3NELLr3S The foregoing ittsttument was acknowledged before the this 4th day of January , 19 9 5' by ROBERT E. MEYER and MARTHA E. MEYER, his wife, ~y_> = r ~ ,--± ,-- ~ ~, rF...:~'a' r . ,,A~ , .~ _._ _ ~I_..._..~ _ _ ~ _.~~ _ ..-~ ~U~ ~ ,~~ ~ ~~ ~. D -~ ~, I JUN 2 7 2005 ~ s. pIANNING & DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES i _ ~ CI'Y OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL CHAINWHEEL DRIVE, INC. !!1~ may,, DATE ~ ~ 1, ~S VOUCHER NO.y S3(, NAME ~7 -___ _ P O # •. _ _ REFERENCE 'N17 F1~~-M REFERENCE DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT __. NET ~, ; ~ ~ c --.: l~ ~~ .. ~. ~ ~ ' '. .. .. ,J _ ~___-- IN 2 7 2005 JUN 20 20 5 PLANNI G & DEVELOPMENT _ _ . SERVICES rt`V ~ . ~ Cl_EARWATER - R~G~N~L S ~~ jti!;' 6/23/2005 ,tl;, ~ ~ Receipt #: 1200500000000005828 11:00:02AM _ ~ ~p - r Date: 06/23/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2005-06054 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check CHAINWHEEL DR INC R)D 053615 In Person 1,20~- Payment Total: $1,205.00 ~-- ~:. y ...~~ ~ . _~:.._ r_~:._ ~ -~~ ' a ~- t~ a o ~y~ w~ ~- ~ ¢ v ' w r ; ~~` ~ ~ i (7 cA u - ~ Z ~; z ., a `I ' s,,._._ .. ~._..._.~~, , THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. i ""`~` ___.~.__._~=.__...J This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. «...~ cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 7 FLD2005-06054 1770 DREW ST Date Received: 06/23/2005 CHAINWHEEL DRIVE ZONING DISTRICT: MDR LAND USE : RM ATLAS PAGE: 279B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR CLWCoverSheet KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT p~ p~ ~e PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA ~~~k~ ~ F~ g ~ ~ ~ I Itl /~a ®E P /s RTIVI E 1~ T INST# 2008295407 10/31!2008 at 01:42 PM ~..~~, ~ f"1~ ~d I''~ OFF REC BK: 16416 PG: 2576-2576 ~ = _ Q 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR DocType:NOTICE RECORDING: $10.00 9q~yArE~.`~~°~ CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 I)E~C'~.AIZA'TI®N ®~ IJ1~TI'TI' (~F 'TITLE Property Owner: ~.~1s:y~c~;, ;JJ'C; ss ..~ ~' ci.vl_ l~ : W- v ~~ ~~ .,j . -J t> ~ ~ ~~ Property Address: ~ r'~ r.~tJ ,~~ ~ ~ c,.; ~`~_f~`=~: ~'~_ ~ J ~:.+^W e:~~~-~~" ?ml-- ':~=y °~ KNOW OF ALL MEN BY TI-IEEE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, beir~ig the fee owner (s) of the following described real property (legal description) situated in the City of Clearwateet•, County of `Piniellas and State of_Florida, to wit: j.- ~;°t- y d ,r~;pN,~ ~ c,u •~ r) ~ t: J'; ~: ~ 1°~ t: l ~ ?-F i"s~ ~~t ~ , , ;- tt e ;~.,/<> L.a?. ~. f.;la_v"'~,.~ '~'~ ~~ i` r i°r.: t~ r ~ L-C. ~ : ~ e .M1 : r ~ a j ~1 ~,.. "(~`t`11L' ~1r2'!" .~ti~r~4'4:~ oat ~~rr Vii die c~~ :,~ 1~" „ 1 - - ~ f=1~: t^i ~ c;c,t~a~~.t'' ~n Icy tip; {/~4{> . ~u~-~ tt~; °~~;. i ~+~ ~~,.v~~ s f ~~r.~-~ , ~c.'~,.;,~;._ ,._.,.~ ~,t ,~..`- Q~ , ~}Y1P +l~S Z ~,t..ti~vc' .. r ~n~ ~+.5 ~°',i~i ~ ~f4''' 1 Ce -'~( ~~ '' ;l 1 do hereby make the following declaration o~~dndritons, I`~`imitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to bP known. and referred. to as a I3ECLf1RATION OF UNITY OF TIT.hE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property s11a11 henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that nc? portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as ono plot or parce} of land. 3. That this JDeclaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run. with the land, as po:ovided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the }weirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the sage may be released i.n writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this irlstniment shall be recorded in the public records of.Pi+lellas County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this z~' -day of (~~=~~ ~--- _, 20 ~ ~~ -__. at Clearwater, Florida. WI'T'NESSES: OWNER ~~.. ~,~.,~{,~.~~-i '~~~I ~ fem. Y 1 (1~C:`i.G~.~~_, ---'(~- QiLtLri-'t mtiee/ vyl~niw~ vN~s -- STATE OF +=1.oR+DA COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,..,n...q___._ _ kINQA S. C®naca ,5,~+`~Y rP ~,~~~: tdotttry Aopllc ~ &fato oA Flot+ts e ~~$ AAy Comm• ~riQlr®E SAp 1S, 2Qli z~sr ~' Commisslon ~ gA S90SS~ °~.J;;,; ; 8on~4 Through Nstionat Pdotaty ANN (SE~+..L ?aIiO~IE) MAY 27 2 2009 ? ; `. 4i1/GLV'rM~3~~ :~\:. tit V17„, 4:4) (h1~.'. ~J1 CITY ~.~ ~l.C~t1~4~~d±T ~~~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ ~ ~ w day of pc~ab ~' , 20 p 8' , by `7'i orn.c a a.Q.L~.~m on behalf of w qm the instn~men~~s executed. .~'"~ ~ ~ f -~~~•~ Notary Public Signahu•e ' G-l>~~¢ -~ ~~ ~~~ Tiame of Notary Printed Notary Commission Number: -~-~.~~ :~' %•>.,~" 3 ~ __ Personally known or produced identiEcation _~fiF-- • Type of identification produced ~f ea,•, c.~ ~'t dz~s ~~c_?-~s~s _ 1770 DRE1~! ST BCP2009-02409 ADDITION CHAIN WHEEL DRIVE Zoning: C atlas# 2796 t' i `Clearwater CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE.,2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL, 33756 PH - 727/562-4567 FAX - 727/562-4865 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: ALEX PLISKO FROM: CATE LEE COMPANY: PLISKO ARCHITECTURE DATE: 9/ 17/08 FAX NUMBER: 727-461-0030 TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3 RE: MINOR REVISION TO FLD2005-06054/ 1770 Drew St. ^ URGENT ^ FOR REVIEW ^ PLEASE COMMENT ^ PLEASE REPLY ^ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/ COMMENTS: Alex, The Minor Revision to FLD2005-06054 is attached. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Regards, Cate Lee 727-562-4557 WEB - WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM /_~ J.1 ~_~ J ~ Plisko Architecture, P.A., AIA ~_~ j \ Alex Plisko, Jr., AIA, NCARB September 2, 2008 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Development Order -Case FLD2005-06054 -1770 Drew Street Dear Ml. Dcik: Chain Wheel Drive is requesting a minor revision to their Development Order, referenced above, and to allow the Owner to submit an application for permit before March 31, 2009. I have submitted both the original exterior elevations and the proposed elevations that we discussed on August 28. Please process our request as soon as possible, and call me (442-7200) with any questions or concerns. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Alex Plisko Jr. AIA NCA > ~ AP/ss cc: Tom Jessup encl Copy of Development Order Original exterior elevations, 24x36 format Proposed revised elevations, 24x36 format 800 Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33755-4516 727-461-0030 727-442-7200 Fax 727-447-6914 Florida Architect Corporation License Number AA 0000813 pliskoarchitecture@verizon.net October 06, 2005 DAV! D L • ~dALLACE & ASSOC P A No 3054 N• 1 C~C;I~~ ~. iNC.~liace $~ t~SS~CIa~~ ~.CJ. C66"Chit~CtS lVluxuuicipal Code Emfarceanent Board City of Clearwater Attn: Mr. Bab Hall Post Ofl`ice Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 Via: Fax (727) 5624735 Telephone: (727) 562--4723 Re: Chainwheel. Dx;tve project ] 770 Dretiv Streee, Clearwater, Florida Case No-: 20-05 R4r. Hall; Regardurxg the above referenced subject, please let this letter repzesemt a time line for removizig the tzailers, that are in eiolation, off of said pxoperty. A.t this time this project is scheduled for the October 18, 2005 Public l-lea~ting, as we have gotten positive feedback on the removaaon and addition for this project, Z do not anticipate any delays in receiving a Develop~ornent Order from the City. Upon receipt of the Uev~elopment Ozdez, our l-ucix- wiill be able to submit the construction docuxnents for Building Department review aao later than Not-ember 18, 2005. Upozt the Gity's approval the Ownez sktouJd be able to begin construction no later than Decerraber 1, 2005. We anticipate that the owners General Contzactox will be able to construct tlae exterior walls and xoof for the new storage area quickly enough txr ozder for the owzrex to be able to rcrnove the ttailezs off of the property by January 25, 2006. As of the Jartuary 25, 2005 Code Enforcerracnt Board r,aeetixtg we will zequest that the violation be expunged from the Owner's property xecvrds. Thank you fox your consideration in re-hearing this case and if you bane arty quesaorrs please do not hesitate to contact me. David L. Christy But Production CDBJ~FtIe S42 c~ou~las cwenv~ ciunedin, flariClCt 34698 ~27/73b.6QQ® Fr~X 133.8343 PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, C.LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order -Case FLD2005-06054 - 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval: FRANK HIRIiARD, MAYOR BQ.LJONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COCiNCILMRp113ER HOYT HA~IICCON, COUNCIL11R61I3ER CAItI,$N A. PETG[25IiN, COIINCILDIET`fI3ER ~~F;QUAI, EMPI,pYIvltiN'I' AND APPIRMA"FIVE AC1'iON EMPLOYI?R~~ • . '~ October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Two Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet (0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category; 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; ~ ~ ~ ~, October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Three 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Plarmer III, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ~~~ Michael Del ,AICP Planning Director S: IP/arming DeparbnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicntionslDrew 1770 Chninwhee! Drive (MDR & C) - ApprovedlDevelopment Order.doc ~~ . ~ . (~ P1.A.NNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 474H, C.LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order -Case FLD2005-06054 - 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval: FRANit H18BARD, PfiAYOR BILLJONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COIJNCIi~tEM13C•R HOYT HAMILTON, COIiNCii.t`1EMI3ER CAREEN A. PLTFRSIiN, COIiNCII n1ED1llER ~~EQUAI. EMPI,OYMIiN"I' AND AFPIIWiA'C[VIi ACTION EMPLOYIiR~~ i October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Two Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet (0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category; 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to' permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff. further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Three 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, _ ,--~ ~~ %'~. Michael Del ,AICP Planning Director S: IPlnnning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicntionslDrew 1770 Chainwhee! Drive (MDR & C) - ApprovedlDevelopment Order.doc FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2"d Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: fI/l~l r ~lr ~~ ~/r~i..-d.~i/' FAX: ~~~ .° ~0 ~ FROM: ~ /~~~~,`fi /G ~ ~ Phone: .~%l~ ? dC~ ,I ~-- ~ ~ b ~P- / DATE: SUBJECT: MESSA NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, C,LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order -Case FLD2005-06054 - 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval: FRANK HIf)tiARD, MnvoR BILL JoNSON, Vicr-MnvoR Joxra DORAN, CouncualFnu3rR HOYT HAb1[LTON, CO[iNCIL;t1EM13HR C.ARLLN A. PHTFRSI:N, COUNCIIAfEM13ER ~~F1QUA1. EMPLOYM[iN'I' AND AFI'IRMA"CIVI: AC7"f0^. EMPI,OYIiR~~ • October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Two n Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet (0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category; 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer, from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; ,~ October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Three 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ...-~ ,~/ P~ Michael Del ,AICP Planning Director S: IPlmining DeparhnentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Vnnctive or Finished ApplicationslDrew /770 Chainwl:eel Drive (MDR & C) - ApprovedlDevelopment Order.doc Oct. 25 2005 03:15PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClear~ater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Oct. 25 03:13PM 02'06 5ND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #84. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELPFAX C435-7329). FAX COVER MEMO TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 ail CG i FAX: ~l/,~ ~U ~ Phone: FROM• /~l/ l~ Q~~/~ (~f Phone- ~~ L _ ~~~~ DATE: ~U ~ ~ •' b `~ SUBJECT: ~~ ?mob J'' ~G D ~,~ ~ 7 7 v D~'-~0 s~a--~ MESSA :~:2 ~' NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: • October 18, 2005 ~ ~ FLD2005-06054 E6 Thomas C. Jessup Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 1770 Drew Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pave- ment) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 3 8 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelop- ment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to per- mit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential Dis- trict with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dump- ster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to . place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing build- ing), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the pro- visions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; Commercial General (CG) Category and Residential Medium (RM) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.68 acres; 29,695 square feet Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 1 • PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail sales and services (bicycles) Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (bicycles) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; single family residential West: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; residential and retail East: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; single family residential and retail; South: Commercial (C) District; vacant land and single family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Heavily traveled east-west corridor, framing commercial land and carrying traffic to and from Tampa/points east and Clearwater Beach/points west. Commercial land uses dominate the immediate vicinity along the corridor itself. Single-family residential land use is stepped back beyond the commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0.68-acre site is located on the north side of Drew Street, at the southwest corner of the intersection of Drew Street and. Mars Avenue. The surrounding land use is commercial, consisting of restaurants, retail services, and automotive sales and repair. There is also a large amount of single-family residential land use at the rear of the site. The site presently has cone-story 7,925 square foot building, where the sales and service of bicycles occur. There is customer parking at the front and along the west side of the existing building. Two large storage trailers are located at the rear of the building. These portable storage units are the focus of a City of Clearwater code enforcement case at this site. Proposal: The proposal in part is to remedy the code enforcement case regarding the storage trailers. The proposal includes the addition of 1,663 square foot building to the existing building, and a new parking lot at the rear of the site. The trailers will be removed from site and are not shown on the site plan. The application is seeking reductions to required setbacks, parking spaces, and landscape buffers. The setback and landscape buffer reductions are necessary in order to make this site work for a 9,588 square foot building with parking, landscaping, and vehicular ingress/egress. Considerable landscaping is proposed to improve this site, which will also help toward visual harmony along the Drew Street corridor. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been filed. The south (front) elevation will have a painted cement plaster finish and decorative banding. Display windows in the shape of bicycle tires will accent the building design for the new building. The original main building will be refaced with architectural embellishments such as decorative roof arches, which emulate bicycle fender curves. Facade improvements will also include exterior lighting and wall sconces. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 2 The building height is proposed at 21 feet to the highest point of the roof. Most of the building height will be less than 17 feet. Proposed landscaping includes a variety of plant species, including crape myrtles and Indian Hawthorne. Waste removal will be by pick-up from a dumpster. The dumpster will be located within an enclosure with a gate, at the northwest corner of the site. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active code enforcement case regarding two outside portable storage units (trailers). f'(1MPT.TANfF WTTTT CTANT)ART)C ANiI fRTTF.RTA~ (Sectinnc 2-7(11 and 2-7(ld**l~ STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.323 X AREA RATIO (FAR) (0.55 IMPERVIOUS 0.755 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.95) LOT AREA 0.68 acres; 29,695 square feet X (minimum) (10,000 s uare feet) LOT WIDTH (100 135 feet at shortest point X feet min.) FRONT SETBACK West: 3.5 feet (to pavement) and 15.5 X* (25 feet) feet to building East: 5 feet (to pavement) and 9 feet (to building) South: 4.2 feet (to pavement) SIDE SETBACK (5 North: 14 feet (to pavement) X feet HEIGHT (maximum 19 feet to highest point of the roof X 25 feet) PARKING SPACES 28 spaces (including two handicap X* (4 spaces per 1,000 parking spaces) s uare feet = 38 *See discussion under Analysis. **The portion of the site located within the MDR District is under Residential Infill review. The site area located within the C District is under Comprehensive Infill review. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 3 • • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Sections 2-304.E and 2- 704.C): Consistent ~ Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting ro erties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment and X Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment and Residential Infill Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and as a Residential Infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel roposed for develo ment. 7. The design .of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project and Residential Infill Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character. and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro osed for develo ment. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 4 • C'(~MPT,TANf'F WTTH (TFNF,RAI, STANDARDS (Section 3-9131: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent ro erties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Develo ment is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation im acts on adjacent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL (1) to permit- the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street ,based upon the recommended findings of fact, conclusions of law and conditions of approval as follows: Recommended Findins;s of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet {0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category; Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 5 ,~ ~ 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pave- ment) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 6 Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application C~ ~ ~~ ~. Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III S: IP(anning DeparbnentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIDrew /770 Chainw/reel Drive (MDR & C) - 10-/8-OS CDR - MHRI / 770 Drew Street Staff Report.doc Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 7 ,, Oct. 06 2005 01:51PM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 81 94468036 Oct. 06 01:48PM 03'10 SND 08 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #@4. ~ THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. ' FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCR, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). ~s~. LETTER ®F TRANSMITTAL Date: September 23, 2005 To: Mr. Mike Reynolds, Planner III Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: 1770 Drew St / Chainwheel Drive NES Proj# 470 CIVIL ~ LAND PLANNING e ENVIRONMENTAL c TRANSPORTATION c We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover X Originals Mail UPS Overnight X Prints Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Addendum Shop drawings Specifications X Applications Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment Floppy Disk X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information Co ies Date Description 15 Com rehensive Landsca e Program Ap lications 15 Revised Residential Narratives 15 Revised Comprehensive Infill Narratives Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: By: s gel Haines, Exec. Admin. Assistant -- p C~C~~~d~ ~ SEP 2 3 2005 FILE N. Pelzer D. Williams RIGINAI- 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 ~ 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 G~]OC~G~~OC~ E~~. Date: To: Attn: CIVIL o LAND PLANNING e ENVIRONMENTAL ~ TRANSPORTATION ~ LETTER O F T IaA ICI S ICI I TTA L August 31, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning Dept 100 S. Myrtle Clearwater, FI 33756 Mike Reynolds Reference: Chainwheel Drive We Transmit: (X) Enclosed ()Under Separate Cover ()Mail ()Courier ()Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered (X) Per Your Request ()For Your Review 8~ Comment ()For Your Use ()For Your Approval ()For Your Files ()For Your Information ORIGINAL ()Originals (X) Prints ()Addendum ()Shop Drawings ()Specifications (X) Applications ()Floppy Disk COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 15 8/31/05 Flex Dev. A lication (Res. Infill 15 8/31/05 Flex. Dev. A lication Com . Infill 15 8/11/05 Civil & Landsca Drawin s (1 S&S) 4 sheets Comments: For CDB Copies To: File ,~ ~ B~/`.~ .. ~ .... , `~"~ l J7V Doreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 (,yy ~ 1J ~ 1 ['~ FN i ~.' .' ~? f~ EEPP ~ ~ '' t { M:i ' " ~ 3 ~ ~~ r+ .J 3 " -~ +c~ ~ :.yy . z ` ':] ^rc _ - i ~ i ~ ' 141 f . ~_Fm.~„., ; ,,~ ; ~ ?a ~" '~ a F ~' .J C.,,~u ~~^ 0 7~j 2 ~ n r 3 i I; ij ~ ~ ! f I j s: - ; i i._.., _ _ +y; ' . . i .. _. oe ~y4 ~`\ t/ ~~~ ~'-~'gl`ER~ ~~, LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 19, 2005 I~'~' ®F ~LEARWA'I~ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, lOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 SUBJECT: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Letter of Insufficiency Dear Mr. Ghovaee: Your application resubmittal materials for the above stated case have been determined to be insufficient. As such, your application will not be considered at the September 20, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting. In order for your application to proceed to the October 18, 2005 CDB meeting, please make necessary revisions and submit 15 copies to the Planning Department no later than Thursday, September 1, 2005, at 12:00 noon. Your revised site plan, date received on August 11, 2005, shows a loading zone with a 20 foot maneuvering space. A loading zone needs to have a 24-foot maneuvering space. This item is critical to the layout of the site as a whole and needs to be addressed before the application can move forward to the CDB for review. In addition, please provide an Existing Conditions Plan. Your August 9, 2005 cover letter indicated that such plan was attached, but it was not. Regarding stormwater, attenuation has not-been addressed to the satisfaction of City of Clearwater Engineering Staff. If you have any question, please contact me at tel. # 727-562-4836 or mike.re Zolds myclearwater.com Sincerely, ~1t~'G,?~rc~-C !~ L [~,G~ Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S: IPlnnning DepnrtmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPeraiing cnseslUp jor the next DRCIDrew 1770 Chainwheel Drive (MDR & C) - NIHRI/nsufficiency Leuer.doc BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYP HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBI3ARD, COMMISSIONER BILL]ONSON, COb1h11SS10NIiR ~~EQUAl. EMPI,OYMEN'P AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EDIPLOYF,R~~ ~. ~~' ~ o } FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2"d Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~~6 rsQ :~..~ / ,do% ~ Cpl/~ ~ s FAX: ~~~ " ~1~3 ~ Phone- FROM• ~~ Y(,Q /~..Qy ~+-d lG~' Phone: ~6 Z - ~~'3 DATE: ~ - / 9~ 6 r SUBJECT:~d~~ 2-~6.1~- _ ~ ~~~~ MESSAGE: v~Q.~ ~ ~!`•P-rte G,~ ~~ /Cr~~1G'c~r ~5/ 4 ~f~i~~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ~i ~ ~ ;.. ;~ ~~; ~~ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 19, 2005 I"I"Z' ®F ~ L~ARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 SUBJECT: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Letter of Insufficiency Dear Mr. Ghovaee: Your application resubmittal materials for the above stated case have been determined to be insufficient. As such, your application will not be considered at the September 20, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting. In order for your application to proceed to the October 18, 2005 CDB meeting, please make necessary revisions and submit 15 copies to the Planning Department no later than Thursday, September 1, 2005, at 12:00 noon. Your revised site plan, date received on August 11, 2005, shows a loading zone with a 20 foot maneuvering space. A loading zone needs to have a 24-foot maneuvering space. This item is critical to the layout of the site as a whole and needs to be addressed before the application can move forward to the CDB for review. In addition, please provide an Existing Conditions Plan. Your August 9, 2005 cover letter indicated that such plan was attached, but it was not. Regarding stormwater, attenuation has not been addressed to the satisfaction of City of Clearwater Engineering Staff. If you have any question, please contact me at tel. # 727-562-4836 or mike.reynolds ,myclearwater.com Sincerely, Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S: IPlnnning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next DRCIDrew /770 Chainwhee! Drive (iYIDR & C) - MHRI/nsufficiency Letler.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYP HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CODIDIISSIONER FRANK HII3I3ARD, COMMISSIONER BILI. JONSON, COA'iM IS$IONER ~~EQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA'T'IVE ACTION EMPLOYER~~ i I I i Aug. 19 2005 03:24PM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept ! YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Au g. 19 03:23PM 01'13 SND 02 OK I TO TURN OFF REPORT,.PRESS 'MENU' #t04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). ~or~~~~~ ~s~. • CIVIL c LAND PLANNING e OR~G~~~LRANSPOORTATION c LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August. 11, 2005 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Chain~vheel Dt•ive NES Proj# 070 We Transmit: X_ Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered ~~w ,! y`I;' AU~a 1 12005 _ ..,./ , 2 -............-..__....... ..._.........._..I~ ' X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Date 15 Civil &Landsca e Drawings (4 sheets 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landsca e Plan 15 Flex Development anal Comprehensive Infill Application 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits 15 Warran Deeds 15 Surveys 15 Stormwater Re ort & Narrative (1 signed and sealed) 15 8.5 X 11"Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11"Building Elevations 1 Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings 1 Response Letter Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File N. Pelzer r„_.. A. Haines B <,: 601 C L E V E LA N ~~~ ~~ ~roj ect Director CLEARWATER, LORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ~o~~~~c~ ~s~~. August 9, 2005 Mr. Michael Reynolds Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Reynolds: CIVIL o LAND PLANNING c ENVIRONMENTAL ~ TRANSPORTATION ~ ~.~'7 ( f l i ~ f AUG ~ ~ 2pp5 i °~; t ~'° 97'' nn~'{~{ile :, Listed below are our responses to the August 5, 2005 DRC comments along with revised drawings. General Engineering 1. Double dumpster enclosure has been provided and will be in compliance with Index #701. Dumpster location has been satisfied by Solid Waste and Traffic at DRC meeting. 2. All F.D.O.T. permitting will be obtained. Fire 1. It is acknowledged that this is not an approval of construction plans or documents other than site work. 2. The one-way drive aisles have been revised to 20'. "No Parking Fire Lane" has been provided on asphalt. 3. 30 degree turning radii has been provided at the ingress/egress. 4. No longer need to comply with HS25 since there is no longer a vault. 5. Fire hydrant has been located within 300' of building. Land Resources 1. The four failing Laurel Oaks to be removed. 2. Declining 12" Oak along Mars will be removed. 3. Innovative sidewalk has been designed around the 24" and 21"Oaks along Mars. Stormwater 1. Vault has been replaced with surface treatment pond. Solid Waste 1. Dumpster enclosure to be constructed to City specification. At the DRC meeting it was agreed by traffic and solid waste where the dumpster would be located. A double dumpster to be provided; one for debris and one for cardboard. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ORIGINAL • Mr. Michael Reynolds August 9, 2005 Page Two ORIGINAL Traffic Engineering 1. Loading parking space has been provided with a 24' drive aisle. 2. 60 degree angled parking spaces have been revised to comply with City standards. 3. Sight visibility triangle for egress drive on Drew is shown. 4. Fence has been redesigned as to not obstruct sight visibility triangles. 5. The fence does not go across the driveway. 6. Sidewalk has been revised to 4' wide. 7. Signage has been installed along with directional arrows on pavement. 8. All curb cuts to the property are existing. The Drew Street access will be an exit/right turn only. This will reduce any back up of traffic on Drew and stacking will occur on site. The two curb cuts on Mars are necessary for the additional parking lot to the north of the property and the curb cut on the south side of the property for loading. 9. It is acknowledged that driveway must be 125' from DrewlKeene intersection. In speaking with DOT, this must remain as is. 10. Transportation impact fees are acknowledged. Planning 1. Sheet C3.1 shows boundary line of zoning separation. 2. Zoning label has been corrected. 3. The vault has been removed. 4. New storage building square footage has been noted. 5. We try our best on the aerials. 6. Dumpster location has been coordinated with solid waste department and traffic. 7. All exterior lighting has been indicated. 8. No Signage is being applied for at this time. It will be under separate permit and conform to all codes and regulations. 9. Sidewalks connecting Drew to the residential activity at the rear has been labeled as existing. 10. Bicycle rack has been located at the north side of the property. 11. Existing condition plan has been included. See attached. 12. Parking lot to the north has been redesigned. 13. Dempster location and staging has been coordinate with solid waste. 14. Surface treatment pond has been provided instead of vault. If there are any additional comments, please feel free to call. Sincerely Dore n A. Williams Project Director ;~ ,! AUK 1 1 2005 ~ ~ ~-~z ..___ _. ~ PLANNlt~ ,_.____.._..._..._ , rc~ ..._.._.... Cal t ~ -~ -- - .... _ ~ ~~ w ~ ~ ~ ORIGINAL FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN The current retail bicycle shop consisted of a 1,663 square foot building. It housed sales and repairs of bicycles. Two large trailers were along the north side of the property for storage. The owner of the property was in code violation with the trailers and a new site plan began. The existing parking was fronting Drew Street and held approximately 15 spaces. There were also a couple of spaces along the west side of the building (Mars). FAX COVER MEli~iO CITY OF CLEARWATER T O:__,l e, f /2 ~l2 6 l/l ~~. Per ~ Oy,,Q.,p/1~c. ~/s ~l/ ~ f (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FAX: ~~6 - ~d~ to FROM: /~li ~ ~e ~~ 'l.~a ~Gr~/' Phone: -~~ 2 ' ~ y'-~ 7 DATE: A ~ /~ U ,S~ SUBJECT: ~~ ~ f~ ~` ~~0 6 ~Y MESSAGE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)~7 t ~ • ll •2~U" am Case Number: FLD2005-06054 -- 1770 DREW ST Owner(s): Thomas C Jessup 2826 Saber Dr Clearwater, F133759 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 0.68 acres located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Drew Street and Mars Avenue. Atlas Page: 279B Zoning District: MDR, Medium Density Residential Request: Request for Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a parking lot for retail sales in the Medium Density Residential District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 8.3 feet (to pavement), from 25 feet to 10.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 11.2 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 18 feet building, a request for a six foot hight fence to abut a four foot high fence, a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 31 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District, and a deviation to place landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north side of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.G. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Tom Glenn, Anne Blackburn, Rick Albee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , Prior to CDB: 1. Applicant shall provide a dumpster enclosure constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Prior to building permit: 2. Applicant shall obtain the appropriate F.D.O.T. permits for construction in the right-of--way of S.R. 590. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 See Stormwater comments. Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . The one-way driveway entrance from Mars Av and the one-way driive aisle in the front parking lot are a the fire lane and must be a minimum of 20 ft wide, and posted with signs that state "No Parking Fire Lane" as per NFPA-1, 18.2.2.5.8. Show this on the site plan PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Provide and show on the plan minimum 30 degree turning radii for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at ingress to and egress from both front and rear parking lots PRIOR TO CDB. 4 . Show on the site plan that the Vault in rear parking lot meet HS-25 specifications to accommodate the weight of emergency vehicles, (80,000 lbs.) PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide and show on site plan a fire hydrant within 300 ft. of the building PRIOR TO CDB. Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 -Page 29 • r Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . The four Laurel Oak trees at the north property line are below average trees with some poor structural branch attachments. If these tree are to be preserved cabling and bracing will be required. Insurance also must be given that the proposed parking lot will not breach the existing grade and an aeration system will be installed under the canopies of all of the trees. It might be best to remove these trees so the stormwater conditions can be met in this area. Resolve prior to CDB. 2 . Show to be removed the declining 12" Oak tree in the Mars right of way prior to CDB. 3 . The 24" and 21" Oak trees in the Mars Ave right of way have an intense surface root system. Innovative sidewalk design shall be incorporated to preserve these trees. Resolve prior to CDB. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues -addition of storage shed and parking to existing retail store, less than one acre Stormwater: 1 . 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilites and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Since this is a development of a parking lot only, please revise calculations to include only the parking area as the contributing area and try to retain the water in above ground features. Payment-in-lieu will be considered for volume deficiency; however, water quality volume must be provided. Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications. 2 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. 3 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Traffic Engineering: 1 . 90 degree loading parking space must have a 24' wide drive-aisle for backout. 2. 60 degree angled parking space do not comply to City standards. (Perpendicular length of stall must be 21 feet not 19 feet.) 3. Show sight visibility triangle for egress driveway on Drew Street. Remove objects within the sight distance triangles that exceed 30" in height from the pavement. 4. Fence must not obstruct sight visibility triangle. 5. Does the fence go across the driveway? If so face of gate must be 20' from back edge of sidewalk. 6. Accessible route from public sidewalk to accessible building entrance must be 4' wide. 7. Install signage and pavement markings for better internal flow for motorists. i.e. one-way sign, do not enter sign, stop sign and directional pavement arrows. 8. Applicant must adhere to one access per site per Community Development Code Section 3-1402 B.. 9. Driveway must meet 125' minimum spacing between driveways and intersections. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 to be paid prior to a C.O.. General Commercial rate: $3,396 per 1,000 sq.ft. 1808.4 sq.ft. x ($3396/1000 sq.ft.) _ $6,141.33 Planning: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 -Page 30 1. Show the boundary line separating MDR from C, and label as such. 2. Correct the zoning district label which incorrectly reads MHDR. 3. Clarify the "new retention vault" and what the solid lines mean versus the dashed lines. 4. Label the square footage of the new storage building. 5. Lighten the appearance of the aerial locus map as it is not legible. 6. Recommend that the dumpster area be located in the rear area, but way from the residential side. Provide a design for the dumpster staging area (on concrete pad). 7. Label all exterior lighting. 8. Any signage will need to comply with the Clearwater Sign Code. 9. Clearly label the sidewalks connecting Drew Street to the residential activity at the rear of the site. 10. Show bicycle racks, as this is a bicycle sales and service facility. 9. 2 . Submit an existing conditions plan. Without such, it is difficult to understand existing versus proposed site design and conditions. 3 . Redesign the layout of the north parking lot, as the four spaces on the east end of the lot do not appear to have adequate maneuvering space. 4 . The dumpster location and staging area should be one, and located at the north side of the site per any specifications as determined by City of Clearwater Solid Waste. 5 . A surface treatment pond will need to be shown on site, thus needing a revision the the north parking lot section. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 -Page 31 Aug. 01 2005 03:41PM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Aug. 01 03:39PM 01'50 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #~4. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-8H0-HELP-FAX C435-73291. U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FAX: ~ ~ ~~ Phone• FROM: ~Ll ~C.e 1 ~.~t~} L G~'~ Phone: ~ Z M ~~3 DATE: ~ -~/~ ACS ~ SUBJECT: ~ ~ .~~ ~ g ~ `~, MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE). ~/ PLANNING DEPARTIvIENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, lOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 18, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 SUBJECT: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Ghovaee: After a preliminary review of your application submittal materials, your application has been determined to be complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will consider your application for sufficiency on August 4, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room (216) at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Please contact Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727- 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for your approximate agenda time. You or your representative must be present at this meeting. If you have any question, please contact me at tel. # 727-562-4836 or mike.reynolds(a,myclearwater. com Sincerely, `12i ~ 4~ ~J, C~:~-y~,o~-~~ Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cnseslUp for the next DRCIDrew 1770 Chainwheel Drive (MDR & C) - MHRICompleteness letter.doc FRANK I-III3BARD, MAYOR Blf.I,JONSON, `/ICIi-MAYOR JOHN DOILIN, COUNCfLDfFDIf3LR HOYT I IAM11,1'ON, COUNCILMEMf3GR CARLF.N A. hHTF.RSIiN, COUNCILAtEMI3ER ~~F,QUAI. EMPI,OYMEN"T AND AI'FIRMATIVI; ACTION FMPLOYI?R~~ ~ ~ Jul. 20 2005 09:35AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 81 94468036 Ju1.20 09:34AM 01'10 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MByU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADl1ANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEF~E CALL 1-~0-HELP-FAX C435-73291. D'I'Y ~F L~f1~2~1A°d'~R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 18, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 SUBJECT: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Ghovaee: After a preliminary review of your application submittal materials, your application has been determined to be complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will consider your application for sufficiency on August 4, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room (216) at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Please contact Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727- 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for your approximate agenda time. You or your representative must be present at this meeting. If you have any question, please contact me at tel. # 727-562-4836 or mike.reynolds e,myclearwater.com Sincerely, Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases) Up for the next DRCIDrew 1770 Chainwheel Drive (MDR & C) - MHRICompleteness letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILI. JONSON, VICF.-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIIr1SFMBRR HOPI' HAMILTON, COUNCILMF.MBGR CARLF.N A. PGTERSRN, COUNCIIMEMBEiR ~~EQUAI. EMPLOYMEN'T' AND AI~PIRMATIVI: ACTION EMPLOYER~~ • • Clearwater FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~U~/~e ~.-~/~-/fir /-~~ er ~ «~°~ ~ ®l~~ ~e ~ FAX• ~ ~ o ~ ~b ~ FROM• ~~~~ lac/• Phone• ~,~ 2 -- ~ ~3 DATE: ~~-l5 ~ SUBJECT: ,~~ 1~~6~ = !'G ~ J MESSAGE: ~~ ~, NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) • 1'I ANNING DEPARTMENT POST QPPICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 6, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Lafferty: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval as listed above for property located at 1770 Drew Street. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Section 4- 202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. In order to stay on the current schedule for review for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 4, 2005, the following information is required to be submitted by 12:00 pm (Noon) on July 11, 2005 (should you be unable to meet this time frame, the next submittal deadline is July 29, 2005 [noon] to be reviewed for sufficiency by the DRC on September 1, 2005, if the application is deemed complete): The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete (submit one original and 14 copies): 1. State the parking reduction in your request. Justify the reduction in your application. FRANK HIB6,ARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICG-MAYOR JOHN DORtW, COUNCILAIEMI3(:R HOYT HADIII,TON, COUNCILMEMI3BR CARI]iN A. PF,TERSIiN, COUNCII,D'1EMI3ER ~~I;QUAI, EMPI,OYMEN'P AND AI'PIRMATIVI3 ACTION EMPLOYP;R~~ 4 July 6, 2005 Ghovaee-Page 2 Please note that this letter addresses completeness items only. Sufficiency will be determined upon receipt of a complete and correct application form. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, ~ ~ ~ Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S.•IPlnnning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IlncompletelDrew 1770 Chainwheel Drive (MDR & C) - MHRllncomplete Letter.doc { Jul. 07 2005 10:36AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwdter-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Ju1.07 10:34AM 01'25 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. F^R FAX ADVANTAGE A5SISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329]. ~~°r~ o~ ~L~~~~a~~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST QFFICE I30X 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 6, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Lafferty: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval as listed above for property located at 1770 Drew Street. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Section 4- 202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. In order to stay on the current schedule for review for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 4, 2005, the following information is required to be submitted by 12:00 pm (Noon) on July 11, 2005 (should you be unable to meet this time frame, the next submittal deadline is July 29, 2005 [noon] to be reviewed for sufficiency by the DRC on September 1, 2005, if the application is deemed complete): The followinf; items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete (submit one original and 14 copies): 1. State the parking reduction in your request. Justify the reduction in your application. FRANK H1136:1RD, MnvoR BII,1. JONSON, VICIi-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL nIC~11lFR HOYC HAMILTON, COUNCILM1IEMI3BR CARLI3N A. PETERSIiN, COUNCILbiEMI3ER ~~FiQUAI, EMPLOYMIiN"1' AND AI'PIRMATIVIi ACTION EMPLOYER~~ Y f July 6, 2005 Ghovaee-Page 2 Please note that this letter addresses completeness items only. Sufficiency will be determined upon receipt of a complete and correct application form. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, ~~~ ~ Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S: IPlanningDepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IlncompletelDrew 1770 Chninwheel Drive (MDR & C) - MHRllncomplete Lettendoc ~f. Wells, Wayne From: Hall, Bob Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:21 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: 1770 Drew Street The trailers were removed and compliance achieved for our code issues. I wish to thank Mike Reynolds for assisting me so much on that particular case. It was a difficult process to get them to come into compliance. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:04 AM To: Hall, Bob Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Reynolds, Mike Subject: 1770 Drew Street Michael Lopez has made me aware that BCP2005-12469 for the above address was voided yesterday (12/11/07). This building permit was to construct the improvements approved under Case FLD2005-06054 for Chainwheel Drive. As the building permit has now been voided, the approval under FLD2005-06054 have now expired. The original submission of FLD2005-06054 was to correct Code violations on the property (storage trailers). Parking was also occurring on the north side of the building in a residential zoning district, potentially on unapproved surfaces. You may want to revisit the site to see if those (or new) Code violations exist. • • Wells, Wayne From: Lopez, Michael Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:03 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Garriott, Kevin Subject: BCP2005-12469 -1770 DREW STREET Permit was voided today. There has been no response to comments and two 5 month letters were sent out. Thanks. Michael Lopez Development Review Specialist Plans Coordinator City of Clearwater, Building Department 727-562-4567 X - 2569 michael. lopez~ajnyclearwater. com i CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 ®~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A Case Number: FLD2005-06054 Agenda Item: E6 Owner/Applicant: Thomas C. Jessup Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Address: 1770 Drew Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pave- ment) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelop- ment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to per- mit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential Dis- trict with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dump- ster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing build- ing), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the pro- visions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; Commercial General (CG) Category and Residential Medium (RM) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.68 acres; 29,695 square feet Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 1 C~ J PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail sales and services (bicycles) Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (bicycles) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; single family residential West: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; residential and retail East: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; single family residential and retail; South: Commercial (C) District; vacant land and single family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Heavily traveled east-west corridor, framing commercial land and carrying traffic to and from Tampa/points east and Clearwater Beach/points west. Commercial land uses dominate the immediate vicinity along the corridor itself. Single-family residential land use is stepped back beyond the commercial uses. ANAT,VCTC• Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0.68-acre site is located on the north side of Drew Street, at the southwest corner of the intersection of Drew Street and Mars Avenue. The surrounding land use is commercial, consisting of restaurants, retail services, and automotive sales and repair. There is also a large amount of single-family residential land use at the rear of the site. The site presently has cone-story 7,925 square foot building, where the sales and service of bicycles occur. There is customer parking at the front and along the west side of the existing building. Two large storage trailers are located at the rear of the building. These portable storage units are the focus of a City of Clearwater code enforcement case at this site. Proposal: The proposal in part is to remedy the code enforcement case regarding the storage trailers. The proposal includes the addition of 1,663 square foot building to the existing building, and a new parking lot at the rear of the site. The trailers will be removed from site and are not shown on the site plan. The application is seeking reductions to required setbacks, parking spaces, and landscape buffers. The setback and landscape buffer reductions are necessary in order to make this site work for a 9,588 square foot building with parking, landscaping, and vehicular ingress/egress. Considerable landscaping is proposed to improve this site, which will also help toward visual harmony along the Drew Street corridor. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been filed. The south (front) elevation will have a painted cement plaster finish and decorative banding. Display windows in the shape of bicycle tires will accent the building design for the new building. The original main building will be refaced with architectural embellishments such as decorative roof arches, which emulate bicycle fender curves. Facade improvements will also include exterior lighting and wall sconces. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 2 • • The building height is proposed at 21 feet to the highest point of the roof. Most of the building height will be less than 17 feet. Proposed landscaping includes a variety of plant species, including crape myrtles and Indian Hawthorne. Waste removal will be by pick-up from a dumpster. The dumpster will be located within an enclosure with a gate, at the northwest corner of the site. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active code enforcement case regarding two outside portable storage units (trailers). f'(IMPT,TANfF, WTTN CTANiIARTIC ANTI fRTTF.RTA• (CPPfiAnC 7._7(11 and 2_7fld**1• STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.323 X AREA RATIO (FAR) (0.55 IMPERVIOUS 0.755 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.95) LOT AREA 0.68 acres; 29,695 square feet X (minimum) (10,000 s uare feet) LOT WIDTH (100 135 feet at shortest point X feet min.) FRONT SETBACK West: 3.5 feet (to pavement) and 15.5 X* (25 feet) feet to building East: 5 feet (to pavement) and 9 feet (to building) South: 4.2 feet (to avement) SIDE SETBACK (5 North: 14 feet (to pavement) X feet HEIGHT (maximum 19 feet to highest point of the roof X 25 feet PARKING SPACES 28 spaces (including two handicap X* (4 spaces per 1,000 parking spaces) s uare feet = 38 *See discussion under Analysis. **The portion of the site located within the MDR District is under Residential Infill review. The site area located within the C District is under Comprehensive Infill review. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 3 • • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Sections 2-304.E and 2- 704.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting ro erties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment and X Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment and Residential Infill Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and as a Residential Infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel ro osed for develo ment. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project and Residential Infill Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel ro osed for develo ment. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 4 ('()MPT,TANf'F WTT>=T (i'F,NFRAT, CTANT)ART)C (CPCtinn ~_91~1• Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent ro erties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street ,based upon the recommended findings of fact, conclusions of law and conditions of approval as follows: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet (0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category; Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 5 • 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pave- ment) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 6 Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application ~ y~ ~- Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ipending caseslUp for the next CDBIDrew /770 Chainwheel Drive (MDR & C) - 10-18-OS CDB - MHRI1770 Drew Street Staff Report.doc Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 7 CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 ~ ~ Case Number: FLD2005-06054 Agenda Item: E6 Owner/Applicant: Thomas C. Jessup Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside En~ineerin~ Services, Inc. Address: 1770 Drew Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development .approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 2S feet to 3.S feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 2S feet to 4.2 feet (to pave- ment) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 2S feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 2S feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelop- ment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to per- mit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential Dis- trict with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 2S feet to 8.S feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dump- ster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 2S feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.S feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing build- ing), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the pro- visions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; Commercial General (CG) Category and Residential Medium (RM) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.68 acres; 29,695 square feet Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD200S-06054-Page 1 PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail sales and services (bicycles) Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (bicycles) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; single family residential West: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; residential and retail East: Commercial (C) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; single family residential and retail; South: Commercial (C) District; vacant land and single family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Heavily traveled east-west corridor, framing commercial land and carrying traffic to and from Tampa/points east and Clearwater Beach/points west. Commercial land uses dominate the immediate vicinity along the corridor itself. Single-family residential land use is stepped back beyond the commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0.68-acre site is located on the north side of Drew Street, at the southwest corner of the intersection of Drew Street and Mars Avenue. The surrounding land use is commercial, consisting of restaurants, retail services, and automotive sales and repair. There is also a large amount of single-family residential land use at the rear of the site. The site presently has cone-story 7,925 square foot building, where the sales and service of bicycles occur. There is customer parking at the front and along the west side of the existing building. Two large storage trailers are located at the rear of the building. These portable storage units are the focus of a City of Clearwater code enforcement case at this site. Proposal: The proposal in part is to remedy the code enforcement case regarding the storage trailers. The proposal includes the addition of 1,663 square foot building to the existing building, and a new parking lot at the rear of the site. The trailers will be removed from site and are not shown on the site plan. The application is seeking reductions to required setbacks, parking spaces, and landscape buffers. The setback and landscape buffer reductions are necessary in order to make this site work for a 9,588 square foot building with parking, landscaping, and vehicular ingress/egress. Considerable landscaping is proposed to improve this site, which will also help toward visual harmony along the Drew Street corridor. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been filed. The south (front) elevation will have a painted cement plaster finish and decorative banding. Display windows in the shape of bicycle tires will accent the building design for the new building. The original main building will be refaced with architectural embellishments such as decorative roof arches, which emulate bicycle fender curves. Facade improvements will also include exterior lighting and wall sconces. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 2 ! f The building height is proposed at 21 feet to the highest point of the roof. Most of the building height will be less than 17 feet. Proposed landscaping includes a variety of plant species, including crape myrtles and Indian Hawthorne. Waste removal will be by pick-up from a dumpster. The dumpster will be located within an enclosure with a gate, at the northwest corner of the site. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active code enforcement case regarding two outside portable storage units (trailers). (''(1MPT.iAN(`F. WTTN CTANilAR11C ANiI fRTTF.RTA~ (Ce~tinnc ?__7(11 and 2_7(ld**l~ STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.323 X AREA RATIO (FAR) 0.55 IMPERVIOUS 0.755 X SURFACE RATIO ISR) (0.95) LOT AREA 0.68 acres; 29,695 square feet X (minimum) (10,000 s uare feet) LOT WIDTH (100 135 feet at shortest point X feet min.) FRONT SETBACK West: 3.5 feet (to pavement) and 15.5 X* (25 feet) feet to building East: 5 feet (to pavement) and 9 feet (to building) South: 4.2 feet (to pavement) SIDE SETBACK (5 North: 14 feet (to pavement) X feet HEIGHT (maximum 19 feet to highest point of the roof X 25 feet) PARKING SPACES 28 spaces (including two handicap X* (4 spaces per 1,000 parking spaces) s uare feet = 38 *See discussion under Analysis. **The portion of the site located within the MDR District is under Residential Infill review. The site area located within the C District is under Comprehensive Infill review. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 3 • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Sections 2-304.E and 2- 704.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and develo ment standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting pro erties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment and X Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment and Residential Infill Project. is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and as a Residential Infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develo ment. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project and Residential Infill Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 4 • f'(IMPT,TANC"F WTTH C:FNFRAT, fiTANT)ART)S (4ectinn 3-9131- Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Develo ment is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east .along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street ,based upon the recommended findings of fact, conclusions of law and conditions of approval as follows: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet (0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category; Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 5 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and. expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pave- ment) and from 25 -feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south)• side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 6 • • Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ~l ~~cr ~- Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S.IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)1Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIDrew 1770 Chainwhee! Drive (MDR & C) - 10-18-OS CDB - MHRI1770 Drew Street Staff Report.doc Staff Report -Community Development Board October 18, 2005 -Case FLD2005-06054- Page 7 • • fr~~, r - Sf¢RV.OOD gT '. GENTRY gT~' ~~-~°~~~ :DZ~~ Y ~ ~raeaL sr ~RL___~J I £ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 v ~ . _ .. ~ ~ LONG._ gT ~--~-~ W u ~ _ cLaRK sr v.EaB DR ~~ 0~. ~ a pp LEVERN Sf. H" 4 ~5 Yj ~ 6R/Y~O VE N£AVER PMK DR _ ~ d G PNlETTO gT ^ ~~~ PALMETTO g1- ~ WALNUT 5< ^ ~ ~~~ ELMVAOD o gT a °z a~ o a ~ ~ ~ p ~ o o ~ MAPLE ~ sT aim q ~~ aRPDRT ¢ Da MARLYN sT p`1E B KBiNETH ~ ~ ^tee [l a PMPNDOD ¢ R ~ ~W0« ~ MC3(INLEY ST y~ ~~ Q M ~INLEY~ ~~ ~~~ ~ PROJECT ~ ~~ ~,~ = SITE ~ fff~~~ N,~MG ~ $ "'~' ~~ (~~~ ~ ' a ROSE WOOD S £s dcw a`v ~ w"r^ D ^ V Q I--~¢^ C-^ ~ ~ SR. 59D DREV/ ST II. ~EJ! Jt Q uuRA ~ O ~ 'wG '< Q < ~ ~ Q ~ ffi ~~ ^ ~~~^ C~g~ ~ ~ a C~ DLEVEUWD gf ~ ~ ~~~~~ ` a a ~ ~ 0 w ~ PI~ ~--~J ~~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ U o ~pp Q~Q g DARfMWTi ST ~ ~ ~ f gTAR ~d ~ O ri x u ~ yu 2 r-~ a u ~ ~ ~ Raeeovr DR ~' ~u GU f L TO BAY BLVD gp D GLLf TO 8AY BLVD. S.R. BD c a '" ; 5 ~ S a~~R ~ ~~<ao a ~ ~ a ~ ~ 3 ~ ROG9i9 Oo cs a < ~ rc a o TUlRFR sr s F quE PYk trN ~ x ~ FlNB gr t~ T y >> / - y N I 3(`~~~ Y~~ ~ ~ ~ MIIRIQ/ ST ~ ~ p 4 ~ ~ g~ ¢ ~ NONN CN o~'t_~JI ~ R °a a 0 df 9DRUiD qR a m DRUID qD ~~ J/SMINE ^ ~ 3 Location Map Owner. Thomas C. Jessup Case: FLD2005-06054 Site: 1770 Drew Street Property Size (Acres) 0.68 acres PAN: 11/29/15/98946/00010010 Atlas Page: 2796 ~1.~f~ __-_' I __I~B 3d9 J ,Yt6 309 - ~ ~ ---~ ,nr 3q7-~--I I 307 ada I rl 6 ~ W . - ~-- - W 3 s.--- ~ ~ r---~ ' ~_ ~2 ~ ~1 Q -- j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ , z 226 r ~ ~ ~ 5 T---- =-~ - 1 I ~ 4 - ~ 1 - f- r ~ ~`±r~_ (i~l+ 1 2~ i ~ 2 Zr `~ ~ Z 21~A---~ ~ ---2/8 Z 21Q--'-- I I 120 211~R___I ~_-2~6 21~_ 216ai--- ~ ~ ---~14 218 215--~ I _ _ I 2114 2i5 -_-I I 2 3 I ~ 2 21 3 ------- ~ ------ I I I I ~I 1 X17 llll~~ ------ I ~ ~ o N , R1e~a ~ N ~ JF --__- 2 D-~~ I I ------TG n n ~ b In r ~ J~ V~ O M'..~. ' w 1 1 r ' tD b r' F ------- --- ~ ~ ~ Ate o I I ! _! servi e ------ 11~ 1 r-1114 11--1 j --114 115 I I fi ~ ~ 1 1--' r I ~ I--J r 1 I 7 I __J 111;- -I ;---108 ei~- ~ ~-..., eno 1~ 105 Q 319 ~" ^ °f " ~~~~ 317 W ~ 313 W 311 Z ~i 309 2 307 305 303 371 225 223 221 1 I 112 1oa y Z 1o1r ~ I ; -1q0 1~- i r-~2 fo3 10 i _; ' ~ ~ IJ ! -1 ! _! I r--i 19 I 1~ j ~ 20 1~--1 ~ --U 1~--1 20 ~,1 I 1 I ~ 1r Il~ r- I_ I ~-_-I I-- ~ 1 rl i' 1 I ~~ t-~ 1~ I - 5 -- c 315 314 312 310 308 308 304 302 I--1 I 300 I_J I 224 --; 222 ; - ~ I I 220 2Z1-J I ~ ~~)~ N p fp eD O DREW ST J-QI--~ ~ ~_ ~ rl `---I i -~r-~ f ~ -ire/-- I I-1 1 I I I ~15i L_I j -~ 11 I I L__I `' y I t 09 ~ ~f0 j ~ I ~{-~ 7,_ 'I"5 ('' r---1104 r I I ~ -- ~ J I` -lf ~oi i 1 S 1- ` ' r- I~p ti yg rl ? I -J Q ~_ ~. Z I is 1 r I - 10 -- Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Thomas C. Jessup I Case: FLD2005-06054 Site: 1770 Drew Street Property 0.68 acres Size (Acres) PIN: 11/29/15/98946/000/0010 Atlas Page: I 2798 ~ ~ __' '-'-- 2 R/DGEWOOD ST /'~ ~ z~ ~t~~ -- ~__..32/~ ____ ` ~ - 32$ f I n --t I -~£4 ~~ f ~_, Q ~ i L-`s'i¢ W -~ ~ -s2o 3z~ -- i ~ ~ ' W _ W ~- ago --1 ~ --r ~ ~, ---r 2 ~ I - , r~ -~__ 3 I r W O ~0 ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ 3fa r-~ r 31~ 3~ j~ ~ ~ 317 ~ m 316 i 24 _J ~ ---~12 r---- ~ W 315 314 i'~s 1QQ• ~ ~--- ,--r, ~' ~'r - -r-sel?a W 3os i r W 3!3 312 ~ ' W _ ~ ~---~ Q 3tz7_~ a Y 3oe ~s ~--3~z LL I rr ~--~4 f/1 r, ~~ --~ a ~ ' ~6 --I ; '-Z e ~ ~ _ `~ 301 300 ~L~ ~ ~~ .__I __2~4 2~,~ ~I . ~ 225 ~4 L_~~ --i ~ __~~ __ ~ 223 i--~ z22 1 ~ r-i, ~__ i ~o W z~3 r' za1 i i `- 220 22r i 1 --; ~ ---2ne > r ~g r I i g --- --1 ~ --~6 Q 2}T~l L---- ------ --~ ~ ---~14 Z 215 2~'I 12 ~ 213 _____~~ .- ~ ~ ----- ~1 -----~~I ---------t -- i----- i h ~ i-20°---, 1 ~ 1 -- i i Z `° ~° ---- - ~-------- ~ i ---- ~ N q I ~ O N r _' ~-- DREW sr C' a a~ r~-~ r_~ 1 ~ ~ __ri r--~L, ,. ----~-~,F-I ~ 1 Ir - ~ -ter-, ~ -- r I ~ 1 1 r1 i 1 ~ j ~ i ~--------' ~ 'Ij 14 11¢--' r-~ '{14 115 112 Q r ~ ~ ~ ~ -i 112 7__~ `~ 1 I _ J y ~15; I_J ~~ ~ L__I II i -'roe 1~_ i r ~ fo° f0s ~ , I i _I ~ ~ ~ , ~~ ~ W roe `I i ~}oa ~_~ ,_ ~ ~~ , }ar--, 1 105 1 2 r-, r---no4 ``~ ' i 1 _l f' '('S~ ~ r I -~ 1~ ~ j !~]D2 i03 102 1--- ~ r~ -11 r- 1 _I' 1 -Vr r- ~ ~01 J- 1 I~ Zoning Map Owner. I Thomas C. Jessup Case: FLD2005-06054 Site: 1770 Drew Street Property 0.68 acres Size(Acres): PIN: 11/29/15/98946/000/0010 Atlas Page: 2798 327 -~~- L-i_~r- i --~ 32~ r r 3231 - ;` ; 32~,__ I r 31 r .r?22 $-- r r r ~ r,---I ~ ~5 --- r 31,6 r~ 343--,_J I 3~ 311 '- j -~ , 3q9 - J ,?11D r r r ~~ -- 3 ~ ~ r-, -, 3°1 - r ~--- ~~7g~~'---, ; ~ r~2ze X42- =_; ~ 177,4 ~- ~ ~ 21~--~-- I r 21 ~_, 235--r ~ ---I I 294 3 I 2 i ~ ---fir- i ! • 29 j --224 ~ ~ 3~ I 1-t -,_ --- /~ I X23-__-t 'r _ ~ _ ~J - ~~ ,~\j° ~y 1 j y ~ 323i '- I ///~~J/J _t ~-i_J t_ -~0 32~__ I y ~ i 32~ I - P Y V _ _ I 3~9 ---t _ r- ~ 31 I ~ 1322 ~ I i I 1 r ~-- ~----I 7 1;._ 11 I Q t 1_~.__ 8 7 __ t 1 3 _r ~ ~ Q 319 ro~ ro m m 398 ~ ~ 3~ .__I ~ ---~2 ~&-~-J ~ ,~14 I____ ~ 2 W 315 314 i ~~ ~ ~~, r r- y~ zit "__ i ~ ~g 11--h W W 313 312 I -- ~34}9 - 1 8 71 rl ~ W 311 310 i - i ~ 3os 3q~-_'-I ' W _ _ Y 309 3n8 W -- r ~-_3d4 W 3d5.--- ~ r--- ~ I; - _ r ~ _ I I 8r~2 ~~ Z 307 308 2 ~- 3Q3___I i ---- > r-t I 900 Q 305 RM 304 Q i 1 I ^-sd00 Q ~~ I I--- ~ H 1 I /r~ w~ f7-----~ ~ __~ ~ 1 I r I?26 ~ ~ ~t ~1 300 ~ I I 111 ~~IF5---J I ~ ,__j I 4 ~ ^I 225 _ ~ ~ 224 _ Q. ~,y,----' ~ --r 22~ (+ Zg----t r-°- -- 223 r _t 222 ~ ~ ~f~rr_ f _ `z#0 Q 22~ _ i i z Z 2~3 i -I i i _zzo 221 i I "~ 21~A---~ j---2Y8 y 21Q--'-- I 1 0 I ~ 219 r i I, ~ 8 Z 21@@ ---I ~__~6 '~. 21~- 217`r 1-----Rt'B ' INS '~ ' 21aw---1 ~ ----~14 2s5-_.,- i r 2~4 zi5 ~ 2t I 2 2 3 I 2!2 213 3 ___ --- ____ ------ ~ ----- I ----- t/Bl _ ----- ------- ~ -- t 20 1- i ' t 1 1 ---- - Ja_____ 1q O O n A •O O d O O N f f -~^--J.~. ~ ~ A m q~ ~ pD o0 0 OD N~ ~ W DREW ST r r ^ N ' ^t ~ ~ I _., ~~-! __ --- ~' I I ; ~---- ~ ~ L_ I 11~ ; ; j11 t1fr--, ; -~ I I rr ~ f ~ I-J r W Q I ~ I__~ ~ I 1 _J r-1 -- ~[ Z 111 `r_ 1 ~ -~ 1~_ ~ ~ I _ y ~_ I I ~~ ~I r' I~ = a. _J I _ Z 1071~~ , f^ I 1QIt'--I ~ tote ~ I r-~0 tQ3- ~ ~+ ~-3o Z i i ~ ~ IJ -~ I_1 I_I 18 ~ 'j j - ~ 20 1~--~ r--~ 1 ; I rl I, L~ ;~ ~--I ~-- ~ I rl i+ I 1~ I j 18 15 r--I - 0 -- Future Land Use Map Owner. Thomas C. Jessup Case: FLD2005-06054 Site: 1770 Drew Street Property Size(Acres): 0.68 acres PIN: 11/29/15/98946/000/0010 ~~R ~'~ ~~ 115 11 109 108 105 10 RU 103 f0 t~--, 20 ,_ I 1 ~i ~_~ I-~-_~ ~ ~ ~ --n i I _I - -- n ~ _ 2~ I r i j i -t 11 r {y5lt I__I I I t-_I ~' y , --t 1 ~ l10 1 I09 .I r- ~~~ r---no r I I --- ~ + I.^-,11 ` ~~ ~ ' ; r- ` I 5 -x,20 L 9 ~I r I _J Atlas Page: I 2798 t ~ _ r ,. , r N __ • ~ ;.. . .* -~ `aJ„ :. a 'J fr' r ~. ~r 'r ~ ~ v~ ~ " ~aJ. ~ - J ~ .r % ' ~ ~ ~ ~% - ,-~ ;~ ~ ~~~ a ~ .ar. ~, J w ~ 4 a ~ ~ ~.. .s ~ 9` ~ ~ ,. r ~ - „~ ~ ~ .. - -----yix ~ ,Y r t1 , ` C"r' w y ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - +y ~ i i1 r ~ 1 ~! = ~ ,,> ~ ,. J 4 ; ~ - s ~ r ~. ~ _r ~ # w ~9 `~ ~ ~ r`! J1 i A.. ~, J >~ x ~ .~ ' ,, ~ ~~ , ate- ~ ~ V ~ r~ ~,. Aerial Map Owner: Thomas C. Jessup Case: FLD2005-06054 Site: 1770 Drew Street Property 0.68 acres Size(Acresj: PIN: 11/29/15/98946/000/0010 Atlas Page: 2796 ~*. _. . ~~- ~ .. ~~ Views to the west (left) and north (right) Views to the west (left) and souQiwest (right) at property rear ~;~ .. ..5i~ . x 4 ~ 5s".-~ R.. Views to the southeast from rear (left) and side (right) 1770 Drew Street; FLD2005-06054 ~~ - _ __~__ k ~ T ~~ ~ ~~ ~ '~~ ~~ ~ ,~ i ^ ~ ~~ i r «k2. -._. ~n~"jjY`- _ ... ~-~r~ ~~r .~ 'ray".~ai~ '•!5° +~ia' '§ ,t;~y~~,{~_~1 ~s~,'R SOUTH EL~'VATION ~ ~ .~ `r A p0 ~~ &~2 ~ ~ ~+ A~~ ~~r 0 ® A ®®~ 44 ~S 4' ~~ ~~ ~ --`1k~~ ~~ _- ~ ~~ ~.~ ~° n nxs +e ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~° ~~ ~ ~~~ ` )''_ f, .e_........,,..,~ ..............~,..~..._. r~ f ~ ~, ~ ~ ~C~Z ~s 0 X35 `'~1 ~; ~ , ~~ ll~nJl9!a0 .~ Reynolds, Mike From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:47 AM To: Parra, Gabe Subject: FLD2005-06054; 1770 Drew Street; Proposed Storage Building and Parking Lot expansion site plan Gabe, This application will go to the October 18, 2005 CDB meeting. Thank you. Mike Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel. # 727-562-4836 E-mail: mike.reynolds@myclearwater.com Reynolds, Mike From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:35 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: Sept. CDB Agenda Are the items major? Or could the DO be conditioned upon getting the information? -----Original Message----- From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:27 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Sept. CDB Agenda The applicant will be notified today. The review of the resubmittal was completed this morning. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:18 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: Sept. CDB Agenda Does the applicant know this? -----Original Message----- From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:43 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Sept. CDB Agenda The submittal was deemed sufficient provided, in part, that the site plan be revised to address comments. There are comments that affect the site plan that were not addressed. -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:01 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: Sept. CDB Agenda Was this determination been made at DRC? -----Original Message----- From; Reynolds, Mike Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:34 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Sept. CDB Agenda Gina, This is my priority right now. I am in the proofing mode now. So far, one FLD case has been screened out due to site plan problems (Chain wheel Drive bike shop). Mike -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:23 AM To: Ready, Cky; Reynolds, Mike Subject: Sept. CDB Agenda Have you proofed your cases on the CDB agenda? The agenda is due to the Clerk. Thanks. 1 Case Number: FLD2005-06054 -- 1770 DREW ST ~2 ~ ~ ~;F- Owner(s): Thomas C Jessup C,~,~~/~'1~ j ~`~ sG" ~'1' ~ 2826 Saber Dr :1/°° Clearwater, Fl 33759 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email , /G~ 'V ,,// Representative: Roush Ghovaee ~/_~ ~' 601 Cleveland Street ./ ~v~ Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 0.68 acres located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Drew Street and Mars Avenue. Atlas Page: 279B Zoning District: MDR, Medium Density Residential Request: Request for Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a parking lot for retail sales in the Medium Density Residential District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 8.3 feet (to pavement), from 25 feet to 10.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 11.2 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 18 feet building, a request for a six foot hight fence to abut a four foot high fence, a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 31 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District, and a deviation to place landscaping on the south side of the fence instead of the north side of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.G. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Tom Glenn, Anne Blackburn, Rick Albee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to CDB: 1. Applicant shall provide a dumpster enclosure constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Prior to building permit 2. Applicant shall obtain the appropriate F.D.O.T. permits for construction in the right-of--way of S.R. 590. Fire: General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: See Stormwater comments. 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . The one-way driveway entrance from Mars Av and the one-way driive aisle in the front parking lot are a the fire lane and must be a minimum of 20 ft wide, and posted with signs that state "No Parking Fire Lane" as per NFPA-1, 18.2.2.5.8. Show this on the site plan PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Provide and show on the plan minimum 30 degree turning radii for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at ingress to and egress from both front and rear parking lots PRIOR TO CDB. 4 . Show on the site plan that the Vault in rear parking lot meet HS-25 specifications to accommodate the weight of emergency vehicles, (80,000 lbs.) PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide and show on site plan a fire hydrant within 300 ft. of the building PRIOR TO CDB. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 -Page 99 • Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 , The four Laurel Oak trees at the north property line are below average trees with some poor structural branch attachments. If these tree are to be preserved cabling and bracing will be required. Insurance also must be given that the proposed parking lot will not breach the existing grade and an aeration system will be installed under the canopies of all of the trees. It might be best to remove these trees so the stormwater conditions can be met in this area. Resolve prior to CDB. 2 . Show to be removed the declining 12" Oak tree in the Mars right of way prior to CDB. 3 , The 24" and 2l "Oak trees in the Mars Ave right of way have an intense surface root system. Innovative sidewalk design shall be incorporated to preserve these trees. Resolve prior to CDB. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues -addition of storage shed and parking to existing retail store, less than one acre Stormwater: 1 . 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilites and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Since this is a development of a parking lot only, please revise calculations to include only the parking area as the contributing area and try to retain the water in above ground features. Payment-in-lieu will be considered for volume deficiency; however, water quality volume must be provided. Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications. 2 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. 3 , That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Traffic Engineering: 90 degree loading parking space must have a 24' wide drive-aisle for backout. 2. 60 degree angled parking space do not comply to City standards. (Perpendicular length of stall must be 21 feet not 19 feet.) 3. Show sight visibility triangle for egress driveway on Drew Street. Remove objects within the sight distance triangles that exceed 30" in height from the pavement. 4. Fence must not obstruct sight visibility triangle. 5. Does the fence go across the driveway? If so face of gate must be 20' from back edge of sidewalk. 6. Accessible route from public sidewalk to accessible building entrance must be 4' wide. 7. Instal] signage and pavement markings for better internal flow for motorists. i.e. one-way sign, do not enter sign, stop sign and directional pavement arrows. 8. Applicant must adhere to one access per site per Community Development Code Section 3-1402 B.. 9. Driveway must meet 125' minimum spacing between driveways and intersections. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 to be paid prior to a C.O.. General Commercial rate: $3,396 per 1,000 sq.ft. 1808.4 sq.ft. x ($3396/1000 sq.ft.) _ $6,141.33 Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 -Page 100 • i, 1 . 1. Show the boundary line separating MDR from C, and label as such 2. Correct the zoning district label which incorrectly reads MHDR. 3. Clarify the "new retention vault" and what the solid lines can versus the dashed lines. / 4. Label the square footage of the new storage building. 5. Lighten the appearance of the aerial locus map as it is not legible. 6. Recommend that the dumpster area be located in the rear area, but way from the residential side. Provide a design for the dumpster staging area (on concrete pad): 7. Label al] exterior lighting. 8. Any signage will need to comply with the Clearwater Sign Code. V ? 9. Clearly label the sidewalks connecting Drew Street to the residential activity at the rear of the ~ site. 10. Show bicycle racks; as this is a bicycle sales and s'$rvice facility. other: / /~s.~~ No C;6mm~nts~~- / Notes: ~~ /`~° ~K~trr.~ ~y.~G~ ~ k'~~ ~i ~°.,.~.~s~' ~'' ~.. ^" /'i ~~iC`~, J J"' , , Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 -Page 101 ~:ommunity Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. ~l,,~ aC~~~-c~~~ Meeting Date: 0~~~~~ Location: ~~ I ~ ~<J~1~~ ~~• ^ Current Use: ^ Active Code Enforcement Case (no) es c,~~UCl~1`~' r~~~`1"~~ ^ Address number es) (no) (vacant land) ^ Landscaping (yes) ~) ^ Overgrown (yes) (~o ^ Debris (yes) no) ^ Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) no) ^ Building(s) (good) (ai (poor) (vacant land) ^ Fencing' none- (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) o Paint (good) (fair) oo (garish) ^ Grass Parking ~e) (no) ^ Residential Parking Violations (yes) (~ ^ Signage (none) .o(~`y) (not ok) (billboard) ^ Parking (n/a) (tripe (handicapped) (needs repaving) ^ Dumpster (enclosed) ( enclose ^ Outdoor storage (yes) no) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: ~.~/oS Reviewed by:_~~(Zu1CE7 Telephone: ~~]~~ - Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 • • Reynolds, Mike From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:53 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: FLD2005-06054 - 1770 Drew Mike, Engineering has completed review of subject resubmittal and updated Permit Plan. Approval condition: Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 to be paid prior to a C.O. D. Scott Rice Land Devel, Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater. com FLD20'OS=vcu~4 = 7? ABDULLAJ, NEIM D 2100 MCKINLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2540 BENDER, BRUCE M 215 WEBER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5932 BLASJO, MERLE H HOFMEISTER, VALERI A PO BOX 175 LOS ALAMOS CA 93440 - 0175 BRINSON, VENIE W 326 BELCHER RD STE B CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2635 PRIVELO, MARY ANN 212 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5911 BENOIT, CHRISTOPHER L BENOIT, ROBIN B 400 FEATHER TREE DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2453 BOLANGER, FRANK D JR 225 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5912 BRINSON, VENIE W 326 N BELCHER RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2635 ~' ~~~ AXIOM SERVICES INC 1805 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2918 BEZEMEK PROPERTIES INC 2640 GROVE AVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS FL 32714 - 2803 BORTZER, CAROLYN R 104 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6227 BRKLJACIC, GEORGE P BRKLJACIC, CATHERINE T 370 ROSALIND LN OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 4609 BUCZINSKI, BERNICE CAPELO, HUMBERTO J CHACONAS, LOUIS J 108 N MARS AVE CAPELO, ZOFIA E CHACONAS, ANGELINE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6227 17613 1ST STE 6 S MYRTLE AVE REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5518 1215 CLEARWATER CONNELLY, M JOSEPH JR DIEKMEYER, VIRGINIA H NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION CONNELLY, BRENDA 1519 WINDING WAY W DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT 1821 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2535 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2918 CLEARWATER, FL 33761 ESIN, KEREM H 2545 ESTANCIA BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2640 FARRELL, SANDRA L 6902 SANDERLING LN HUDSON FL 34667 - 1699 FINANCIAL WAREHOUSE GROUP 4595 TOWNE LAKE PKWY STE 130 WOODSTOCK GA 30189 - FISCHER, GARY A FISCHER, RUTHANN K 2089 RIDGELANE RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1268 G T LEISURE CORP 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 FL DEPT OF TRANS 11201 N MCKINLEY DR TAMPA FL 33612 - 6456 GIPSON, DAVID C GIPSON, ROSWITHA A 570 RIM ROCK RD KERVILLE TX 78028 - FOROUTAN, AMIR 1976 DREW PLZ CLEARWATER FL 33765 - GOEHL, KELLY GOEHL, HANS J 1405 STEWART BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2808 HECKROW, CINDY HILL, JAMES M HORNBECK, CARLA 603 RUSKIN RD 108 N ORION AVE 3085 BAYFRONT CIR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2336 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2919 HERNANDO BCH FL 34607 - 3002 r y HOUSH GHOVAEE HUSTED, BETTY NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING 316 N SATURN AVE SERVICES, INC. CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5927 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FL 33755 JESSUP, THOMAS C JESSUP, DOROTHY J 2826 SABER DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1121 KOCHER, ROBERT KOCHER,JOANNE 27 ROYAL PALM CT LARGO FL 33778 - 1301 LOPEZ, ROBERT A 225 N JUPITER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - MC KINNEY, EDDY A 1208 LAGOON RD TARPON SPGS FL 34689 - 9478 MILCHICK, KENNETH R THALER, JEFFREY G 328 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5913 NOW INVESTMENTS INC PO BOX 12332 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 2332 PAPAGIANNI, CHRISTO PAPAGIANNI, APHRODITI 306 N SATRUN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - POFF, BENJAMIN F POFF, MICHELE 114 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6227 RATLIFF, JAMES B RATLIFF, LORRAINE 7 MAYWOOD AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3335 MASON, MILDRED E 107 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6232 MC KINNEY, EDDY MC KINNEY, ROSEMARY 1208 LAGOON RD TARPON SPGS FL 34689 - 9478 MOYER, EDWIN R 43 CITRUS DR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1207 PACE, SHERMAN H 1744 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6216 PILEGGI, BRUCE PILEGGI, CHRISTIE 1251 RANCH RD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8701 RADCLIFFE, THELMA H 120 N ORION AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2919 RHODES, LEUNDRAY TRUEBLOOD, CHANISE Y 114 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6231 INGRASSIA, CHARLES 308 N SATURN AVE # B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5927 KONTOS, PERRY L 220 N SATRUN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - MC CLOSKEY, CAROLYN L 214 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5911 MC NEAL, GENEIEVE F 105 N VENUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6236 MURSELI, MURSEL MURSELI, ZEKIJE 109 N VENUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6236 PAPAGIANI, THANASI 221 N JUPITER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 RAMPERSAD, DEONARINE SINGH, PREM 1759 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6218 ROJAS, PEDRO P ROJAS, CLARA I 2084 SAN MARINO WAY N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 4133 SCHEFER, RODOLFO E SCHUPBACH, ROBERT D SCHUPBACH, ROBERT D SCHEFER, SANDRA Y SCHUPBACH, MARILYN J SCHUPBACH, MARILYN J 15547 TIMBERLINE DR 15 N SATURN AVE 15 N SATURN AVE TAMPA FL 33624 - 1617 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6230 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - ~ ~ SHIRLEY, RHONDA PERKINS, JOY 9333 98TH AVE SEMINOLE FL 33777 - 1730 VENTURA, SALVATORE A VENTURA, LINDA A 115 N VENUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6236 STREET, MARK STREET, JULIE 308 6TH AVE INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 2550 WHITE, RON A 602 15TH AVE NW LARGO FL 33770 - 1150 TATE, CHRISTOPHER W TATE, JENNIFER L 214 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5925 WIDDERSHEIM, ANGELE 115 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6232 WILLIAMS, MARTHA A WITT, JAMES C WRIGHT, DAVID 111 N SATURN AVE WITT, ANN L WRIGHT, TINA CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6232 2232 HARN BLVD 3102 BISHOP DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3750 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5007 - 270A ~ 2708 271 A ~ `~ °e ~ ' ~ 8 6 eD ,Doi 2' q ~, ' .~'' a ~ 55 6 rmo 34 ,Da t , 0° rooa 28 ~ # CITY OF CLEARWATER 9 O _ 56 8 ~ r a 518 ~ ~ 54 i 1BIe-aa9 g °D SD rooo Dv h~ ~~ PINEILAS COUIITY FfgRIDA _ R aTB 53 57 - q p STREET S s0 i/ , ~ ys d h ° „ 6` ~ °~ 4 ° a01 60 3 1aD aos52 ssr ~ sfA ~ ° 6TA 56 ao gg 3f>r-DT9 ' PREPARED BY ~ t PUBLIC NORKS ADMIN157RATION ^ 3 4 5 } 2 ~ 1 ~ SBA„ A sTe 5 s s06 - ~ ' ENGINEERING ( ' ~ 100 S Ny11e Are., Ck>walev, fl 3]758 9 7 B 62/01 5 6 T 51 ''.. aa'' eDe ~~jp. 7 ~ _ ~ =9A BB II _ ~ ~ `,, ~~'' aor CITY NURSERY ~j ~ Ph: (813)562-4730, Pon (B1})526-4755 ~ nub://wwwdrarwaler-n.aom/Engheer/ ~ ^ „ 8 S '° e ~ ~ . 50 C '~ 60A 6 nr / ~~II is aa° 4f/pt l WALNDT $ STREET a ror 50A eao -'--'- B7 ~ nr ///~ 1 ~1 Y ^ ~ D.° aoe-~00 1 y i mer: DhNO PuDllc InfOrmDllpn dela Is lurnlslred Dy lne Clly of CI°Orwale! ` ~ C tl ~ ~ ^ E G --- 8 49 Q 61A 51 aaa / x aryl 4 Public Works Adm9ilslral bn/EnplnBMlnp. Ond musl DB ttepted and used by the r<clDlml Iln the underelondhp 1DOt olhe d°la 3 4 6 11 t0 9 ebb Q a9A mf --- °J0 . . 86 - i ~ ~ / ' recelrcd was collected far Ine DurPOx Dr devNOphp D gapni< inhostrvc ufr Inrmtwy As meh the CR of Clearwater PWA/E 10 B 7 12 73 ~ F - - ~ T/J ~ 82A C 62 °06 .... - ' ~ -_ J I mOkes nD warron t9s, exDrea9ed Dr ImpReO, concemfn the h 0 ° ° ~ ° ° $ 14 ° 15 48 ti (~ eo1 4BA vp E~ m0 - f 65 / ~., / ---- .._ -_ .....- ............. --- --- •-- ...._..., - ocarocy. eomgetenexv rNloDlllly. or sullobllll f Ih dale for Iner licular u e. iurthermors, the CII °f Clearwater ° n Y e ° B E ea0 ~ i r.w ` r /02 / 41 1 ~ ~ ~ F 0 ` ~ °0 ; .~ lllly wn otsoe•.er asaodaled wun Ine uae ~ W v EWYt00Dm STREET ° 47 9 ~ ~ ° (/1 Eil 63A C . I B3 >ao .] d 1~ > ra 1p09nes::oo- i4i ~ ~ ! // __ ,.._.._......-__ .._...._....... ___ . .. _._.. i~. .....~.i mi~ux or aucn dDlD w n = n 1 E 5 ~ 2 BO 3 16 >IJ m 47A .~ty~ "-"--` ~ _ O ~ ~ Z § > 1184 ~ :' ~ / T ~ ~_..._.._ ..................... ~--__--- ---------------- - -'- ~ i ; ' -- 1 '" ---- T Tnla A11oa pope Is fub~jec~ to Derlodlc ehonpes. for mrormotmn obaul lote>t redslDns I p eox call PWA/C or 3 . a 6 nt na 46 .] 46A >oe m 64 6aA . N > J ID ~ i .---.------ - ----------- , ( E 4 ~~ g . riait our WeD sif e. >u Cd~~-~ m -- 8S `L- $ uC ;; C i G~ & _ 191 9D 2s >oe 2 ~. 45~ os 45 ~ > rr FRED COURNOYER >11 ; , ( i ~... r~ I""'~ I N ( >oa ~ i t 7 >os ..?L a4A 1 65A -- 65 >on r ~~~ II 'I I, ...... ~ I ~ j' _ I~ I F 7 I ~ esr 26 ~ r~ W 27 p,,Ay 4 ~ ~'1 / - 66 s 82 et 1.. i _ ~ i J I 1 i ~ - 5 j ' ~,. 89 of > z~ ~ 18 > d4 >oe / ~ aJA YD 66A -- _ eeo , , ~ ~... I , I B .....~ ~ ! ' _ H~ J I~ t R Be 27 £ 20 .19 / - a3 67A 7 e et a, J L / \ ~ ..__ -.. i ~ l. K ' 1 7 1 I - e ta ,ao ~ ~ le g $ _ , ~ e Ba0 ~ ~ De aeJ-reD . ' `---- --- - 4 , 03-- -- ~ o too 2DO 400 fioo rf ~ p - 97 ers 28 ORItAS °p0 a2A a2 i \ 68A \~94\ 68 na BO r ~ ~ . \ / ~ ~ ~ I I 66, I I 1 -~ - - >pr ? S i ~6 29 30~ 1 ~ ~ J eo4 e°9 OtA >a E >u OF ~ e°° I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ SCALE: 1" = 400' oe y 3 32 79 rr c err 85 eo° at 71 70 69 a 5 ~ 3d aol 72 ~ g "° ee L L ~ ~ ~ J I II I I „ li ; ; I I I ; ; i L .N I N ' ' fqi>.rAb.... ~'s' EGEND: ~ „ a, ~ 4, 7B _ --J ''' , , 1 i ' ..__ - 84 ~ n ~ N ~ ~ gICHARDS° y4 0 CASLER CT 3 a ca I I I ; 1 ~ II ......1 .- _= i ,, ~ I ' 6 BJ v ~ v Y N H o a Y ~ so S C o CK 38 ma Nt J6 @ 73 74 p0 @ I ^ E I 7 I I I t ._ -. .. _.. _ __ .. .... „ LOCK NUMBER O Q 37 err 39 7 era 75 76 a a ra em rSfee N ~ R MAPLE T >S o ~ 1234 LOT ADDRESS 60621 22 e° 8 ly 3 2 1 \g c~ n ~ 43 1 ss 20 °s ~ ` P a s R rs 125 19 61e 18 C wt7 16 15 fC 63 64 22 ~ bn 21 76 ^ °a 7 • D ~---~ CITY LIMITS LINE • /0 23 ere ` > . S A K „cp ~ .' a lr 121 611 ale s: ~ ~ c ~ C ere 17 s ~ D t5 ° - 1 W ao>t9 24 666 r ~ a °B e hT 9 9D9r 'a as 123 20 n KENNE TH P1ACE P° 20 alJ ~ b ° SHADED R P TY 7 B 9 t0 It 72 73 l e bob ao e 0 60+ 19 t so B 8 royo 4;`._ J A EA - ROPER y < fe 25 a oa 122 2t sae as 14 me °0 aoa 82 aos 23 bof aDT aoa iB aoe aoa to aD> ~ 9 OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS a n aor 28 sof 59 nr 81 fre >0 86 fr> ~ L-. / 86 frr ~ n - e 121 22 aoa ao> 6t mr 24600 g 60J t7 19 602 soo aaa so/ 13 rase ~ tOlae • AGREEMENT TO ANNEX RIDDEV/017D SIAEET j Z7 ~ B2 8 5 89 ~ 120 600 p, a4 aoJ mr 13 bpb aoa cor 60 a4 25 Y' fn t6 11° oe 4n r tt I $ 6 fa s ~ fro 58 fd fN - of O Ora 43 1/4 a 59 Orr frD 28 < fr fI4 .Or 20 ur Ira t2 a+ reae recf ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY eD I 60 ~ fa t5 28 ma 57 6J ~ Ba .._. 901oe f oa 119 12 or a ~~ foe 1t ',y' 21 40° ioa 11 1 9 I B 77 t6 15 74 fol t a 29 IOI -+`!6 64 701 Iva 83 91 1a0 I - 01 118 10B fpf ~ ' foe °2 tae I f fDe ~ foe 58 10Y 27 fof 0> foe fo> io] 72 ZONING DESIGNATION M D R f0 fo > a e 9 06 1 JO ~ ° 55 a 65 82 92 17 g foz €25 S < ma 41 lot f0 < foa 57 70.1 2B soo a 4aa 13 4D1 • f°t 8 22 C foo < w 70 ° 101 1; a4/Ot ONE LINE 45 d 46 ~ < 89 RIDOEY'OOD n TREET aoo >S ++> foo fof 58 an 55 29 i ai 70 je RIDO EMOOD 5T o ~ aa (/~ 47 B @ 12 37 O 54 40 9 b:e L° n a 72 ~ ~ g9 9 a ra Ts7 sz aro 99 R tr 66 ~ era 8t ~ 91 a r6115 +10 B au srs S4 3t i srs 23 E au 43 18 17 32 53 87 80 114 26 an 39 Ery art an 53 32 iio a 11 sta ,~ sD 87 ~ aoe 7 of 17 ua ne are 52 a1 33 bra q 24 n+ g a a 42 o> 49 m f aoa66 Jae 10 33 mf 52 an 68601 ms ¢ 95 a oa 71S 2 a,a 38 ~B n zL~ an sia 51 aro 34 of n N rag O 2g Jro Ira 7 ~2 n n a 13_ ~ 41 o 90 65 oar 9 34 aoo aor 5t - 0 89 7g 96 me m -- r 112 28 soe aoe y7 SOD m s ~ nr 50 a t 35xee na of ~ ar ~ a a1a 11 a r ~ I am rn B - 35 rm 50 aaa wr 77 97 - -41 [e~ m l 5 ma am ~i me 8 rp> 26 aoe iii g 1 D.e. see-4ap ro a 15 8 57 tt e mr 6a lA ~ 2r R: ioa soa 38 mf ma 49 36 ms 7 aa > 7 r tr l[ + rra 7 to 7/ m 4 apt ms mf 48 aor 37 ~ 27 100 m1 5 m a 78 19 52 83 l2t ea - ~ rn ~ r n 110 70 too a01 B m a 17 6 etr w. 6 37 - ++ ~ - e6 ue rn 35 ter 3 rr4 to 47 JB iii ~ in S 2B r > a0 0 78 q 51 ~ 82 y ~ na 72 tro +n 75 99 22° r ro 109 ru rra r+t v r4w ru t a zss r+ a 18 5 t o rro $ rr+ ~ 5 38 +1+ +ro - na - 31 rm rrr 3a 2 iso rn 46 39 tm sn 4 ieo rra 37.. ~ 54 yy> - a7 73 7a 100 n e 108 nai t9 ns 40 rrs 3 29 an - 3 ~ r ro 19 t sr z 61 rrr t S9 r,t fro TD tN -4 rra 3T DRPf 1 nee naA 44 na of Rn 216 4 i a < t rr o s 20 36 I me 55 60 ~ 41 2 30 y 2 a 1 toy 3 40 +°+ _ y ,,yy-,w, tea 108 CONDO ~ o rc ~ tl e 2 2 3 4 35 2v° q8 67-31 43 42 I 31 1 Z Y +0 0 22 4 eo j ~ 56A : 8 °D sB '9 Qt 12 4t 4 y 43 as ~ ($ fot 102 ,03 to o tos a 4B " ~ ~ , T J .. 7 REVISED: £ F k ~ ss g DREW E g p @ 46 es ~ ~ ~~ E eD m ; ~~ _ °° C= ~ E~ 6 ~ ~ eo I ~ 8 ! ~ ~ D3/D8~99 . „ _ _ _ _ _ _ $ STREET __ ' R ~s °° -- -- ~ a 4 pq - g B ,7 m C ~I . R - ZONING ATLAS °w_ 4D 4D g S E ;N IEQ Lwp BE >p 9E L4 ~Y k11 p ~ Y11 [ ~ g E 6 ~E p C lgk RR gg R m 4 ~ ' 8 4 I I 9 to t 2 ~ k ~ R m t e° FF E ER I1SY1 ~€~ F ~ ~ I:t: _cl: c~c a ~' ~ ~ ~f ~ _ a @ e SE 1 /4 OF SECTION ~ 288A • 2888 289A ~ 11 - 29 S - 15 E 0 8 6 L Z 3 sl - s eZ ~ . dssz asez . egBZ. N011~35 30 9/L 3S ~ >3 $ ~ ~~ w $ a z:: z zz a 3 ~~~ z t of 6 e r [ 9 ~ Sb'~lb' ~NINOZ -- "~ >: -- a m _ Yo5 ~ m `~oec~eY's°°~~~ ~~~1~=~9~ ~° 'a ~ m ~ a ~nga~c~~laugaa ~' a. a. £ ~ x s 133nts - - - - K M3tl0 '- - --- Z '66/80/£0 ^p~e~ ~ 0° >7~~~~ioti °° ,sly' oa oo ie'~~ ~ u go aaa a ss ? aa° ~ S '03SIA321 ~ . t r 1 ~g I, ~ sot rot £9t Lot tot so Y s Y ~ ~ de a • ~ ~ ~ °A -~+ " t I ~ ~ ~ fv Lv lv Z l 65 BS LS 95 ~ t ZL aor ~ t[ 1 Zv ~ SE-L9 By ppe SS >f O A L IZ nr o p OOM00 90t rm 1°dtgi'`" - vor Or [ aor > 09 _ em ~ OL vrr > z v~ irr Of Z vlt rrr u > vma t C7 SS I 9[ ur a ur nv ~3Ha L[ t- ur orr raa Irr 5 s 6l err ,~ f [ Ov -ma mr PL °a [L 6[ p l9 xa --t ru err ar, rnr _ m1 6Z BOL va OOt La - ur z vS O 24 1 $ BL P1j vrt Jit a Itr mi B[ Irr m L r[ Irt mr l£ - err nlt pq 9[ S ~ L9Nr o s/r D Dlr rm v vi airy BZ 5 iii aai 9C L4 vrr r:r [ art 60l mr sa ma 66 SL ur nr ZL ~ 9 elr ~ ~ ~ £S C 9t g Ll sae ~ ut Wt S£ ut 0[ nr - to C[ ~ I» tp 9t am S IOr +°01a. LZ 9 lar , ra Be am rm v Oll vrr -737 ~ m nr tL G° nr 9f c ear [B ati S 6£IJr 90D 001 ~J m lar mJ St °0 ovr-wv 'D'o sac oar L <or C 6r v~ ~ ~ vm 6L tvl tr LB LL rm ~ ~j~ OS vrr vrr SC B ar n9 lS I # O nr 1 B eor = alc 9L g r' - - eor ea S£ OS im vmp S L£ Ztt ror ror CL 69 rdc ooe 59 oosOS for It 9lrlt ~ 41r ~ IOr ear9L - ooC rot l9 O Drr L I 96 l5 v[ fi N W L irc Ot ie SZ O 69w rte[ lS cic I Btp ~ tU nov r0i 99 <OC ror voe 99 nos roc b4 Lt<or ` L.f N vr¢ [f ZS •'rv ~ elr B[ 9/v rrD LZ S6 ~ 9m' ZS ££ Ol 4 0 1' 8 rrr >Z O I err my L P vac _ L9 C)1 erv t Ir me Lf £S rrv ftt ~ 09 [9 Zt a Br £v O Jdf rte Js fiC f5 N ~' rtr BO /rr gZ 9lr 91a tlr 'A tr if K ntr my Sll vlv ~ [6 l9 99 a a BB vre ~ O (a~ ~Zlu Wf J ~ v5 ,~ l£ Ll a L9 ~ vp ~? 0£ 59 vrv > g ° 1S OOON3001Y arse ~ B Or <Jt ff 133Yt 000/13001Y o a 69 ~ 9r 9 59 ~ 3NIl 3NOZ rrv 6Z 95 ror oor oor 3g for s aor ~ aor 1°v r > ror Ut lv P0+ > rm SZ ul Z6 ZB S9 SS i ~ 0£ [t nor ~ Dor aor 3 • 10/rv ~ Otp e_or ror LZ & fl cor m+ BL LS vo+ s ~ ° m v ~Q ror or ~ oar It t% rm 91l rm oor l6 i9 rm ~ rOr v9 aoD BZ ror m N011tlN01530 ONINOZ aQll Lt or ~ aar <or rLL 95 eor ~ vvr Le am I@f vvr -- - - ~ >l vl St gt Lt Bl 6t ~ tl for vor lL 'r7ra rl aor m Ir 6LL em vvr s LS 901 gL ~ Op rwr ~ Br mr ~o 10192 65 rrr rrr Zt 06 r8 {9 Sl Br I 3 Aly3d02ld 03NM0 AlIJ ' wr nr i Plr ~ rn rrr £v v'+ nr O rrr fi rrr vrr 8 sw gl 8 I -cvr Zl mr rlr OZ O slr SZ 09 rov rr0 OZl ~ 69 SB Z9 BS ~ LL ^133Y15 OOOM3001Y tl 'Oa la wr 9t rrr rm ovv J9rl 109 OOi uI Om ae9fl ar°°° 00° lZl 9/I tlI tlI Dlr Im J X3NNV OL LN3W33210tl • Ot ~ Cl poy rag 6l LL a~ rov 9Z 19 aov ZZ - YI 88 !B en gZ Ll mn 8 1 .tm 6 1 ~ <09 vo9 Bt s9r 10p ft Z9 v0D vD vOV rt Sv eev ZLt vm "I 9B oc tB 65 SZ > S11WIl Ally t131tlM21tl31J 30151/10 ~---t o<vr ~ 0t em m BL apv von eor lL Bt ~ ft Lt tl Ot 6 B L A1213d021d - tl321tl 030tl N5 L__J rrD B Bt ~~n g 39Y1d X13NN3N o OL [Lt a ~yga °ea~rmarr ~n aav vs 6lr°v ^ I Sl 9t~9 so OZ vrv ~ ii 0 1ln rZl ran °° L°° ~0 }y;~ 3NIl S11WIl AlIO ~~~~~ L ~^ g Ct 7L <IV E Y g ~ ~ S a 3 m9 - ,,~~ Htltld~-• 99 Irv £Z pL t0/iv ~ ~ t L [ - Q' 9L elv vuL v9 [9 5t gt Lt Bl ov vrs 6t SLl vc ° 919 ss ~ ~N @°t+ fJ Zp ~~'~•~ 5532JOOtl lOl b8z/ ~ arvai ov rav rrv L IZ 1 31dY11 g ~ O N ._ ........... .... Opt rr0 9L SL rL £LK< 6£ L£ a a Y36Wf1N NJOIB 8 .~ 1 I ~__-p_-' "'I -~ & ~d rec ° 9£ a~a g~ £B ..... J I =_'.~ I' 999 s is Y3isr~ 9 opeis osax+H~iY °D o ~ a o a ve .. 1 t(----~ i 9L ''a, m o ~aN3~31 I I ~--- ~ ~ raD ° S[ o ~.9.!I...<.f.?i i (N ~ I Y/: I 1 tl i ((~~ ^'-~ r ~ 0t9 LL +[ 4 ~ I I ~ I 1 ~ 'I 6LDD9 b9 BL tL In 009 SB IID ~ B° ,OOa = „l .31VD5 I ~ ~ `-`Ji Z[ It aOf 1 ? ~' I ( / ~ ~ \ I mD ~ ~\c +c< Vl/ vOV r°[£ a a 57 fiz 9~ ~ me I 1 , ~ I ~ ~ vlv B9 \r i Zv s1D 222SSf roe /99 / ~ OB tlB9~~ tlZV vvv 311Y0 BL L9 9 rle I -~ ~ - J - ~-~ / mr~w au ~ oro ~~ Ooa 009 099 OOZ OOL 0 y V- ----•-- -, r L J / - 9 3 a BB rrD ~ yY --"t C 1 k-_---°~ r--`- !~ ~ 1 /~ rnD LB VLg' / [p 6t ; oz a Jo<LL I r NI I I \ / lg --- tlf9 tot i L. H ~.....I i _--- I 1 P9D fiB r J .... -tl99 - / / ` t I i 6 00< 1a, ~^ 99 r 4 B Z IO< ....~ t 11 .,~C -~ ~~ ~ I •~_~ I'~~~I lee 99 / ~+~ ~ 9Z rre ~r .1 ~, ~I ~~ _ TT I - ~ ~ r I----- ~ ~ 3 J LB Do< ~~dfatvr x w N ~ i i I I i ..., -- ) S9 tl59 / i L LZ o< B0 S O6 I I i~.....! ° ~ ~ n< a3A0Naf103 03LI3 /tlsr sr 9o soa tfi >> ~ s LL 11 1 _ 'alR 9aM ,no l.n, -... p i i ~9~ ._.... ! 0 r ~k.7I1 QIS i9 ra "ors N -- ~- ~ e0a tl< rla n< Z ,0 3/tlMd IlOa asoald su°R,r.a, Iw{01 InogO uollOw»1N ,03 •$ -aj O i ~ •-. 3 ~ ~ I ~~ /I< > 99 ~ 'Zi tlv9 tl9n -~ 9y 9t LL 9Z 9 ~I p aafi°ova gpo,,aa of 1 'f9 c q a6od so9v put I I .................. .......-~ ..... I I ~ / - O ~ 9 ~'T10A ' _~_-_-'--1G7C7CT_L"-'--"_-_--_'-_'--a k i '•.• rB ~ ~ - tlL0 0a rr< pv y u r. ^ ay [[[yyyyyy [[~~ 133 oIOP 4anc t0 acnnw ,a ..~_ ..~ ._.---__-.._-__--_f... .. - a.-.~ // (M~ Waoc.ar ~ 00 [B I tlf9 ~ ~L~+1 9 asn a41 411• palopozso ,anaocl9V+t Lllll°gl ou sawmso ]/tlMd ~I &....p~'•' ~ ~-.- 9 1 / I Oaej 9ta a ~ L/j L ~ Oa a .. .. ....__....~ I.. ..~ I »lo.,wq-ro LI19 a41 •a,ow,aVl,nd 'acn rolnallrOd 1a41a Lvo I G•. I °~ ................_.._..... ......_...._...._ ` LO/l9 '1 ~ / 59 - ^ VB6 m 100 0 0 $ ,ol oloP clVl )o AIIIIVOII^• ,a '<lII1QOINr 'acaualapuroa '<awwa0 / °00 ~ (7 B9 > 9l 91 S ° Ll ~ L 19 bl 9 aut 6ulwaau9a •pe0dwl ro paecaldxe 'cgluwroM ou sevow ~ ~ ~ D0D L9 'Or. tlZ9 _ _ ~ 3 £ t 3/tlMd ,alOV,oaIJ to LUO aVl 'vans ctl •L,atww, a,nl>rulsoyul II ~ ra0 >rydoL ° 6uldoN^ap to asa0and aVl /ol Wlaalloa r pa^la>a, ••••-• 99 --- tl°a 99 -m r~ V i OIOP a41 tpVl 6u1pu01cr>pun aVl 41t+ )uapl>ar a41 LV Oacn puo a ~ ~ m° O 60 9 0 6 Ol ll ^ 9 Deldaa>o a9 Isnw Ou0 •6ul,aeN6u3/uglwla,Nwpy reroM allVnd its I / 99Y l9 Vt9 ~ ~ 0 q ,alOx,Oal~ to Ally aVl LC pouslu,nf el ol[p uollOwrolul allgnd tyM1 / ~ L9 --- VO$ ~ r0a o 133Y15 0 1(IHIYM I~ mr-vw r~D / L / / I aev ^ .' •+f°Nrl° l0/Lr~ ODI n Jtl n vo9 O a ^ /,aa.y6u /w rg-,>lo«,m s+.. d '~ 1 B9 tl15,,,~p I //' 11V ~ ~I~ Aa3S21(1N All3 ror ~ ~ ~ roe ` v6~ ~+ is ov L ° 9 s to/zr L "B °6 sscr-9zs(sle) :+a3 •osu-zes(nel :~Vd -J . 'O'I 9SCi£ 1J '+rlv.anap •'awr allatn S 001 ~ 6r` _' Doe 69 `tlB i OL9 Vt- 9NItl33NUN3 v ~~ ~ 6B °9 BS ~ YLS •K \ ~S eoa t L t 9 9 S > £ NOI,LtlIiJ,SIN[ViOtl SH80N 011911d a. ` oe ~ - ~ LS ees a AB 93NVdied ' 1 ° - eLf-Itr[ 9ygt LS LS 09 IOa YOIgO'IJ 'A1N7100 SY712NId 7 r~t ~ a Sodm °slwoa~s m d er9•D191 ~ S d 95 v5 g '~- ^ ~- xlINI0L1 ONY p ,v,AC~ 9L l l 9[ ~ v c SS roor 0° ~~Z~~~~~~ ~0 ~~I~ Np 1~, •• e°-r Dam roor oaol o . +e m ~ $ zi g g fi ~ a ; , ~ ,. - d «z eocz • eo~z a --~ ~~ :~, -~ . ST ~C.h~CapS -ordoS c~ v~j 1`~ ~ 77~ - 2709 ~ 271A 2716 ~ C[TY of CLEARwATER +,`~ \ ~ ~'- row ~ Oea looo sD ~ '~ •,•\ L_1 ~S (y/tJ, AND~VICINRY °_ ap , '`, ~ 1; ~• s ~ i PINEILA9 COUNTY, PIQRIDA • ,~ ___________________________ PREPARED 6Y \ T '\ '\ '. ~-A p~ PUBLIC HORKS AD1fINISTRAT]ON `\~~ `, ` `, \ , w ~ g' ENDINCERINC I ~ , v \ ,, Se top S 4yrlle Ave., Ceorwaler, fE 33758 i , 'ri~yttlr, V I +,9 \ \ `~~ ; __~ --------- eey ,~ ~ Pn; leu)562-a7sD, foT: (ets)sz6-nss t, ~ ,I nup://.,».Dlror»olrr-atom/rnglnan/ • °~ ' Cleorwaler °°' DlatwimtT: '\~,Q (` I) ; -.1 ~ AIfPOfk ~ Pudlc Inlamollon dola 4 turnlmaa by Ina Clty or Cleorwaer `\y PuDllc works AdmMlalrolbn/Englnaerlnq. and uct oa ceDled ~ r ` ~ r v '1} •`+\ and used by the r<dpknl wllh the underalondNq t~olplha dda ~ TRACT A q 4'op ~ ~ `,'~. \, eal recelve0 rw cdlecltd for Ine purpose pl develppH o hic i i . ` ~ ~ ~ Mlroslruelure Invanlory. Aa wcn, the Cilyd of Cleorwaler PWA/E • -.ST_. ADfDIi~A1S---CO-~--[1-----; ';~G '• 1~'~ ~ ; '°-"'-_---'--"-'.._; 1 o~~«r omd~+enesa.+Ddlablldlly.ra mlfobllllY olnlhla dalp lpr ___..., ea I I I 6 an ether prllpular u+e i hr Clty o! Cleorwaler ` .......: :~. ,$.~ :4..3.....~.......9.....~i_.3...$' • , `v ` L. J LJ lJ l J LJ l ~ lfoewr pssocioled » In lh< use ~ + PWA oewmes no IMailily rwno m re the 24-113 1 ._ w mlwae or wch 6afa. , _ __ __ ; 32101 \~ , ` Q ~ L J l J LJ lJ .-•~ ,01 +pNk[: I-~----; ;----~, , - - ~-J L_~ Thl+ Atlas pogo I+ b 1 to Derlodk coon e ~' ~ j8 8 ~a 8i jewi ~ ~ ~ f'-- `~'1 r-`~ `~ 1 r for Hformollon oDpul tofe+l reNSlons Dleose coA PWA/E or ~ • O :_.. ' ~ q~ i .... .... .... .... .... vlail our Wea silt. i., a ten; ,O Q '`, ,,~ ,p (......,..,...........,. .............~teo a~ , J' W ~ 04 - A V y~•~\ 1 ,``,'~~ ~• j l_J lJ lJ LJ LJ l_~ ---- ,~ ~ _ ,' : - - ' _ .: ~I A'rv'. O ~ / i` Ct 1` ~ Y ~ r1 r, r1 r~ r ~ --- N .....i; i vQ1, i p~ i .... .. .... ... ..... ~r ~ rtoe ./ ieeej • l A ~ ,,'\\~S , L_-__J LJ LJ lJ lJ \ ~..._ N I .. ~ I ietr i q.e Toe-rs ~ ~ ~ r---~ r- `rte ~ ~ r~ / ~ +ney p.0. ,It-sea __ ~ ~ ~ ...... p.e. T51-Tea : ~ '~~ i' ~_..~..-.. ,....~-__.._.....~ q.D. eW-Ica S A • _ L.J LJ LJ lJ lJ l~ o.e. eee-reo ~° ~ ,, _ ~ i u._.. ---- ~ Tol ~ ' °n' ~ , --- • ~ , r~ r~ ` ""~`~~ ' ~ I• meI 0 ~ 100 200 400 600 . ,.'" i I i i ~ '\ ; ••' ~ ' L__J lJ LJ LJ L~ col __ ---'I ~ + 7 W '~ SCALE' I° 600 i ~+ emi ' ~ .... ... ...t II I j i i _ _ _... ~ I y, 1•~__J LJ LJ t_J Lj 1~ ~ N j „ ',eiy.. .. R __ ____________ ~.1.ba :.~,°... en ie of amt < i ... 1--------~-°~------....~ :.----~ I ~ LEGEND: j ` `-- ~ ST. ANDREWS COVE I let/; ~ ~ I l -I --- ----------------` i ."..--~---•--~..._~1 (. e.....v....s...«I ~~ ~ i I:lw O BLOCK NUMBER 0] DRIVE _ $ `'---- ----- ~ ~ 6 5 6 3 2 t w eo 't - ------ ~ 1234 LOT ADDRESS CV °J 7 $ g ~ ~ a em2t t er: en 27 ~a~0 ~n -' , `~•~'0h t ~ ~ ----- CITY LIMITS LINE ~ ,e, - 9 - we 22 2 20 e.~ IAFr" 30~ NARwaY rARlc ,~•' ~ - e TREE pR. R 23 °~ cot j1 ~~}~• © r--~ SHADED AREA -PROPERTY reTO °/i 3 601 Ig Il+ 2 L--~ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ' ~ glees YJ t7~ ~e 19~ 20 6 aoT 2d ao° toe W ~ tolaee ~ 8 T5 6 t6~ ` 77 3t6 ~ is 16 8 13g ~ a °D { 1 = ~ ~ I~ 14 ~ 'O 3 • AGREEMENT 70 ANNEX OI 11 ~ 13 t6 15 16 rot 26 L A 'A C q L i2. 1~q 16 t7 P6 d Iee1 ~ ~ ~ $ IteT7 ~ ~g b GLBERT $ 6$ ~ ¢ 8 a e g 10 u+ tls j l5 t3 pI I6° ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY 1/e I/e 7 E ¢ t2 CIRCLE ~ R an 26 6 7~ 6 9 ~ t0 11 ~ 1T $ r i l l ~} a` S 6 7 9 6oT 6 6 CJ7 8 9 11 ~ I Ioe 5 44/07 6 ~ 29 lot ADD ~ 34 4 ~~ 11 666 ~ ~ e $ ~ a ID ~ ~I /Dl ~~~ MDR ZONING DESIGNATION p 6 ur In 10 1 3 1 3 iR+ nT.= ~72 Do ~ 5 E @ F g at L4` , 2 E 6 < 2 T; RR2t po tgl to I t7 t6 t5 Ru ~ 8 ZONE LINE N ~ a5..1oe 31 ~ b 6 Iop Iol ~ ~ $ Y 5 I~ a 8~ e e E ~ 1} xx so E,db '" Ica ~ sal 3T 8 NdONLEY ~ g a t e 1 E I ~ t ~ ~ tt E I $ t STREET a ale t0 o lER ST ~ °3 am < ate 37 ~ C ~' ws a/a ~ 7C II e ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 T I T AEZdI[ OPD _ a/a 1 ' ° 10 al 62 ~ }4 7 E ~ E ~l ~ 9 exy ti/+s/ee ~ 81a °a w1 et le a 7 6` 5 6 ~ ~~~ 1' 2 13 I4 IS 6I ~ 6 B 1~ tll S `` S alp aD9 ~ / ~ ma 16' 11 9 mt 61 e/e ele 35 O 6 5 /m ~ 7 t2 ye '; \ J 6 a0 D.D. sea-!eq 9p9 15 Cy aoa 60 su BeT36 1 2 3 all 1 2 3 6 6` 21 23 T2 ~ 0 19 18 17 IB 15 13 a°a { apb 6 5 6~ a 7~ >o aba aoT E E A 6 aoe ~ 37 $w ~ aa ~ aoe t7 6..1 as 36 too col - ~ ~ B ~ ttr ~ C $ !~ ~ ~ $ L a 4 e ~ e ~ ~ ~ TL 16 ~ HAR Z P • ml 5 r l t 5 rii R S NARdNO S1REEi $ rte to /oT 3 p !ry!1 n r/a 6 a/ ~ 9 ~ to < ne t a~ ~ 20 A 3 3} g 7 6 5 tll g I~ a>S /t 2t 2 rls too y Q 1 r x too + fr/a, toe ~ 33/05 7 $ . U 1t! ~~ + t T T n o o+~ 13/06 2 ,rp 4 OREV PLAZA rpa ~ ~ ~ q 8 ~ _ . ~ $ ~ ~ ~ S ~~~ Y ~~~ ea € 00 eo DR P Z K• so ~ 6 ~v~i~ . 7 g N A CREW SL S.R, 590 Z -- --- -- -- -- A R - ZONING ATLAS ~ ~~ ~ $ ~ $ ~ ~ E E„ "° 8 ~ eo ~ •e ~ R >Q a~ m 8 00 d ~ E eo 8 * * " $ $ IN _ _~~ ~_ a eoa ~ ~ ~ a $ a .~ ~ ~ 9 ~ >o ~ TA A SW 1 /4 OF SECTION ~ Q 0 /t `~ ~ ~AAO ~ ~Raa 2896 ~ 12 - 29 S - 15 E ~,J f"1 tll @ E $ i H ~~ C C 4 Q II~~E 0 ~ ma 8 7 ~ $6 A A R a 1 2 S t 5 6 8 9 10 t1 12 1 2 3 6 €' 26 2J TZ 21 ZO 19 18 17 18 15 16 t7 $~ffi3i ~~ ~ ¢ a 9tl E e ac ~ ~„ ~~x~ a c~c 8 8 8 Z NOLL~3S ~0 4/L 3N Sd~ld JNINOZ se/oa/o~ ~aasU3a 3NI, 3NOZ NOI1tlNJ1530 ONINOZ aQ)l A1a3d0lJd 03NM0 A11J X3NNtl O1 1N3W33a0tl sllwn AlIJ a3ltlMav3,o 3olslno ~,..;~:"1 /.1a3d0ad - tl3atl 030tlH5 ~"~+~+J 3NI, S11WI, AIIJ ----- ss3aaotl lo, eszt a3awnN roo,e O ~aN3~31 ,OOZ = ,l 3,tl95 009 OOb OOL OOl 0 N 'a1R qaM rn° il°N n 3/tlM 6uloW ~D Irad ~1 la>(gnaaly a6od sooliowrbiN r°! as Nv awt '31.Z1A ~o{pp Wrla /v anrslw m sn ay{ y{{r paloposo rwpa{py~ Lllpggl pu sawrlsso 3/tlMd n{owroat7 !° LIIJ aVi 'a V{rnd •aen rolnallrod »Vlo Luo rq oloP a141 !° L{t04°Ilnc ro •A1vIgvlPl 'wwlapwoa 'Laplmao •vl gNwaauoa •pepdtul ro paaanrdre •ary{uouvla ou rvaow 3/V/Ad ra{o.roalJ 1° L11J a41 'Vans ry 'Lm{uanul arnlarulaorlul arydprfi p 6ydaNnap Ib asotlrnd a41 ro/ PaNa1Pa rox panlaaar pl°D aV) IoYI fiypup}rlapun ayl 411A Iual0laa/ ayl Lq Wen pup pa{daaao as {anw puo '6q,aaNfiu3/upllorlslNu+ptl e>I)OM allgnd ra)palpplJ )o LIIJ aVl Lq pBVelwry rl vlvp uvllnwlalul alNndn, uawlaprlq /bvu6w//wbay-raloalpnp •ara//:d{{V SfLr-9ZG(tle) aoL 'Of[r-Z°S(LlB) ~Vd ~1 ~{•p 9tLtt ld 'n{oamalJ ..a„v aI N S WI _V `„'+Ids• ONI633NION3 a ~~ NOI,LtlaySlNl{fQtl SHaOfl OlTflnd a. AB 03Wd3tld vantma 'xixna~ srnarna ~ 'I`~~ xi1N101A aNY ~p ~~ive~~v~~ too ~~~ -~ -I -1wl •1•=ICa{sl 09IC61~ala°1a~1>siLlwlti '~~i $~ ~ ~~ IL t ~ o ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ 2!~ gg a s - p ae - aaxre. - - ~ - nro - -gg ~ - - - - ~ _ gigg g s 8 a9 ~ ri ~ i... ~. °° ur ~ m E 8 8 E os Y . Lg ova it 9 8 S ~ ~ ac-¢n bL/!t p OZ/tl H! I ~ 9t/vl 5t/1l OL/bt ft/bl ~ Ll N OLI 6 8 L gl 5 b~ f N I ar srr 4 3 fz/bl 1z/tt 6t/bt .pr e°f,. zl/bt so/ft eo/n t ~ w P m• ~uHl at/rl w N rorµ/rt oybl M N ~ -t vbr _ 7? ror ro 101 I 6 r - ~ / ~~ ror ~L t ror ry s t ror !,. ~ L b oa ro. / mr ipr mr for ~ C }`L' Z ~ t POOi ear ?N m .-ar oa !? ur .ut-rbac 0! q oa 'D lar "'lll f I a: _ ~ ° - ror f f va 9y t ea- arm 9 C r rrv O vrr toe FYi Y O nar N rar <rr ~~ rx ZO/f L ~-~ ~ I ~ > - ~ -~ as z mAL m ra ror L '9 roa roe L L rm roeL Z r Z I I f lar A ~__ l l U 9 l r rm t t spv ra ror ror r L b.. - aa pp aa aa 7a a ~ ror ~9= om~9~ 9aa ll_. Obr a39. `~ft IW fl. a~l~irm mrg ~~ ~tr I @ m om /m r e tttr 8 ~ tl rrr -l Yl ~ ra 9l ~ g0//l ~ Ll cl R T ~ ~ @a ~ B pi 0A St tl C 3 ~ 8~ $ b vu f °!J r? s fl Y? r?£l N f{ ~ raft 80/bL °0f 81 9ll 9tl OZI tZ LZ fZ bL b w ?~ 9l I t I l OZ Z ~Ilr o /N SL /? - - rm z °R t - - ea o? Lt ra t f 0°r ~ <oa Zt llr r0:Ll z1 LO/bl M 4t Lqql tl O$$t 8 9 ~I0 aZ 10a vaa Zt Ol ~ e ' 9 Z 9W t ~ I f ~ra I0711 ~ It vas Irr tt ~ 90/1{ ~ voa f{ A ~ S $ 9 ~ 8 1 l $ ~ Il g ~ ~ S l r ~ 'a0 tlY15 oa rm am l7 /a S L33tltS ~ ffi Z OL Ot 0{ rot Ol 50/rl H1f10-LLWO 8 g l 6 ill ~ J/I g ~ 9 all ~ ~ rll 6 ~ bat l rIl Dll S L L.` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r vu I ( _ 9t 9 rrl a/ 9 nj ~~ N III ~bt -7 Ll tll 6l OZ tZ f 9 III a/ B £0/bt ror f{ I <or ) I ~ L pp/ ror L. L va ra L ZO/blvp1 ~ OII fi 9 L s Z val lpr O y Ivl ml 9 g ra ool B LO/tl la alt ~ ~ ~ ~ w l ~ ~ of v a 6 lrule OWAWH ~ or O ~ V1 m g s m G ~ °/ G LI/It ~~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ a ~/~ ~ vlLJVaL ~~ I t rl > ~ I r a .r / sl/u Q1 > u ~ rl ~ a V1 ~ ~j ~ Zl ft bt L 9/ Ll 8t 6l rl I I{Z LZ ~~ ~ OZ Sl 9l Ll ~1 6l \ D r f r rr G tv f rl m. f sl/Il N a r a ft oz gs > r lZ Z{ < r31 < Z< Z L° ° Z 4L/Ll 0{ 6 8 L 9I 5 / f Z LL < 1 ll 6 B L 8 5 9 f v 1 : t ~ l 5 l £l/ll / I t Ol Z t a ~~ ~~ 9~ ~ ~~ g n ~ a r $g 3 133tl14 8 8 ONY'13A317 fl 8 • IL t? r a Ol tt I ~ ll ~ ll ZL/ll ~ tt/Il ~ £1 bl ~t 9g IL~ 9t1~ l OZ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lt ~ ~ft ~ t ~ o E ~ r°~. 2 $ z ~ A Lt ° I ~ 0{ Ol ° ; r 6 Ol < ~ ° Ol Ol r ~ 1 Ot Ol/tt < ~ a ~` L ° ° lL ri 5l 9t Ll 9t 6l OZ I 5 9 r a Ll Lt Ol g 9 L 9 5 b f o/ Ot O O L 9 5 4 f L l u rl I 6 g a e ,,, g a !b r/ 6 N 8 p a 60/tl i 7 yI r N~ a ~ ~ a. ~ A +y,y 6 ~ yr ~~ i~~ ~yS & a a g~ Q g ~ & ~a ~ ae f Ot 11 ~ 8 B °I ~ 11 L 8 °/ ~ a g rr I B f/ SI w e 'l. 80/tt I L3aws vdnn s g dl L c a oa e c u or L tin L a m c y co/u °1 ~~ ~~$ R$~ S 9{ ~ z{ 8 la I 9 W 90/l{lbl OL It Zl ft 4l SI 9 Lt 6l vbr ror It _ __. 5 9. la pa 9 it! 9 la m/ 9 ~ s> L S 5 roi' nr r rrr ror 9 s ra ra s 50/tt ~ B g L g s ° t Z OZ ul p va Ot em S b ~ ea > ~ ra > al r0//t Olt ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l 911 9 011 6 I b f r a ~au t b nr b aw b+ ~ gt g 3 p 0 8 pe 8 oa ft bl 9l 8{ Lt 8t 61 OZ B [ 9 S b f L l a ~ h a a a g ~I ~n~ 9 ~ e t R ~ rn ~ rrr f f vll ~ III z f vM f f al ~ m vu f0/ll 8 133lt1S ~0~ ° G blot-rtta f rn d ai a a ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ' q~~ ~ ~ g ~ s d a ~ ~ ear - ~, I l Z Z l l z z t z r.i'' l t~ ll Zl fl I l 8l Ll gl gt dl oz ~1 a tt Z{ it 9t f Hl L l fit OL $~ ws 9 ~L £ ~~ ~ ~~ ~. m aa $ ~ ~ I~ °~- l' m u~ t,. i ~0 r~~ 7 h ~ m 3 ~~. ~~~ . l0/tl ~~~~ m Ot g ~ B ~ L ~ aag g ~ 9 f Z Wt g g a L a" 9 IS a 9 f Z a rtl pr yr ' f S B $ ~~ g ~ II~ ~ ~ ~AL L Ce0 5B a Cn a ia s0 a ag ~ ~ ~ _ _ -- ~ r S g 0g9 n!s -- -- y~ -- -- -- -- ~-- br ~~ ~ a! w a ~ ~ g °° a m ~i a ~ tv 9b k B aa B gg B 8 tG d m ~ ~ a ~ ~u o° ca naz t a~i7 . Sb dpi ~ ~ nl Ll j ~ ` ~~ S g a~swl rn gl gl 6p D p OL lZ ZZ LZ bZ v s{ L f or aol_bL LI It OL I fi 9 I 9 Z aDl Lt ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ l ~ ~ ,~ .;:~ s )7, ,~ ~~p ' 1 ~:1 - _ _- =a7 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNING= DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, C.LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUA'ICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order -Case FLD2005-06054 - 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as. a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval: F,~nrn< H113IinR1), MAYOR BILL JonsoN, VECr:-MAYOR Joxra DoRnN, Cour:cu_~fenu;rR HOYT HAMf1,TON, COUNCILp1FA113ER CnR1.LN f1. PISTFRSI:N, COUNCEIAIFI~IBER ~~FQUAI. EMPLOYMIiN"[' AND AFFIRMATIVti AC1'IOr. PMPLOYI•R~~ ~. _ I : ~ ~ ~ .. October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Two Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is 29,695 square feet (0.68 acres), approximately 135 feet wide; 2. The site is within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) future land use plan classification and in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Residential Medium (RM) Category.; 3. The applicant seeks to redevelop and expand an existing bicycle store with parking lot, with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. 4. Other improvements include the addition of 1,663 square feet to the building, provision of a new parking lot, landscaping, facade improvements, and exterior painting; 5. Two storage trailers will be removed from site as they are not shown on the site plan; 6. No other changes are proposed for the site or building. Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff finds the proposal compliant with the General Purposes of the Code per Sections 1- 103.A, B.2, E.9 and E.12; 2. Staff finds the proposal generally compliant with the Flexible Development criteria; 3. Staff finds the proposal generally consistent with the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill and Residential Infill criteria; 4. Staff further finds the proposal compliant with the General Applicability Standards per Section 3-913; and 5. Staff recommends Board approval of FLD2005-06054 based on the recommended findings of fact and conditions as stated. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan be revised, prior to building permit issuance, to state the existing conditions within the site data table; ~ r ~,~ ' /'~ ; .,.~ r .l ' ' October 21, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee -Page Three 2. That a SWFWMD Permit or Letter of exemption be provided prior to building permit issuance; 3. That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 4. All Fire Department comments are to be met prior to any building permit issuance; and 6. That a Transportation Impact Fee of $6,141.33 be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ~~%~ Michael Del ,AICP Planning Director S.•IPlnnning DepanmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslDrew 1770 Chninwheel Drive (MDR & C) - ApprovedlDevelopment Order.doc '~ • • ya "~~^~_ CITY OF CLEARWATER {~~ ti ; `~.~ . ?,`,,'--~ .; POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ~' ~ MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ~r, ~''~- '~ TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Alex Plisko, Jr. Plisko Architecture 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Development Order -Minor Revision FLD2005-06054 - 1770 Drew Street Dear Mr. Plisko: September 17, 2008 On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 6 conditions the above referenced case, which was for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 15.5 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to nine feet (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill RedeVeiopiii%iit Projc~t, under file prv-viSivns of ScCtivii 2-iv4.C; (2) i0 pciiilit nori-rcSidentiai parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Avenue) from 25 feet to 8.5 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 11 feet (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along North Keene Road) from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Avenue) landscape buffer .from 10 feet to 3.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew Street) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Road) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. for the site at 1770 Drew Street. A Minor Revision proposal has been submitted to revise the approved building plans with the following: 1. The building has. been revised to include changes in facade improvements (hardcoat foam band and trim) and exterior painting (stucco). 2. The building will be approximately 18.5 feet in height from grade to the top of the parapet and 17 feet in height from grade to the top of the flat roof. 3. Anew awning on the north elevation. 4. Anew window on the south elevation. 5. New aluminum gutter and downspouts and a new window on the east elevation. 6. New aluminum gutter and downspouts on the west elevation. ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER~~ ~~; In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor Revision and are APPROVED. This Minor Revision is shown on building elevation drawings submitted September 9, 2008. Approval of this Minor Revision does not change. or modify any Conditions of Approval adopted by the CDB or any time frames contained in the original Development Order dated October 21, 2005. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Cate Lee, Planner II, at 727-562-4557. Sincerely, __ _ ~~ Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director v ~.~~. CIVIL e LAND PLANNING o ENVIRONMENTAL ~ TRANSPORTATION e STORMWATER REPORT FOR: ORIGINAL CHAINWHEEL DRIVE PROJECT ,~ _ a~b~~{//llQ.aaE r ~ ~C ~ Y. ~~;., 4 ~ ~' .. - O ~\ ~..y. Ram A: ~ ~. z E~'4?~`,I:,,=,.: .~ ~, a o .,;:°.. .~~;° , ~~ ~'~~.• - Ufa r ~f:l~~ ~4`~«.• - a•.~ '~' ~ August 2005 Project No. 0470 _. +, f ~ 'i 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 ~-.-.-~.,,._,._ _ __ ~ ~~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 P~~1`'`"'` ' '° ~•' r~~ C" i ;~ ._ _ . .. NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM -~~ '•~ NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ~ r CHAINWHEEL DRIVE Stormwater: Replaced underground Vault by a Pond designed to include the new parking area and new storage building for water quality volume. CALCULATIONS: New Storage Building = 1663 SF New Parking Area = 6869 SF TOTAL AREA =8532 SF Water Quality Volume Required= 8532 x %2 x 1/12 = 356 CF Water Quality Volume Provided= More than Required Volume. F~.ti. ORIGINAL .dN+ 1 `~ 1 j ~ ~i nnc 4.« .. August 1l, 20QS Thomas C. Jessup 2826 Saber Dr. Clearwater, FL 33759 Reference: Chainwheel Drive O~~G! Nq L Subject: Maintenance and Operation of the Retention Basin Dear Sir: Per the rules and regulations of the Southwest Florida Water Management District, we are required to furnish you with a set of instructions for maintenance and operation of the retention pond. The retention pond is designed to maintain certain volumes of rainfall runoff corresponding to specific water elevations in the pond. The control structure regulates the level of the water in the pond. The volume above the slot should be discharged under a grease skimmer and through the slot within a few hours following a storm event. The volume between the slot and the seasonal high water elevation should take less than 36 hours to be discharged through pipe to the storm manhole. The water level in the pond should drop approximately 10"below the slot within 36 hours following a storm event, assuming there is no interceding rainfall. Here are some suggested procedures to keep the lake system functional: ~~ i ~i i .:•>CS The side slopes of the pond should be inspected regularly to assure that excess siltation or erosion has not occurred. Siltation and erosion in the pond shall be controlled to assure that the storage volume is not affected. If water discharges over the top of the control structure with no flow through the filter pipe, the storm water facility may be in need of repair. Repairs maybe as simple scarifying the filter medium, forcing water through the cleanouts to cleanse the slotted pipe (much in the same manner as back-flushing a swimming pool filter), or as involved as digging up the filter bed and replacing the filter medium. . ~. • Grass clippings and other vegetative debris should be removed from the area surrounding the pond. • The area immediately in front of the control structure should be cleared of aquatic growth • Limit fertilizer use around the pond area to prevent nutrient loading of the facility. • The control structure should be checked monthly and all debris cleared. • Your Management of Surface Water Permit should contain a number of conditions which must be met. If you have any questions or concerns about this project please do not hesitate to call our office. ` yefiflt/f~d~ld ~~. n;~•~ °No s~de~i~igi~eering Services, Inc. G I i V A L ~ OR! ~:. r;~ .. . O u . P ' ~%~ m ~~ el~~l~.D., P.E. ~. ,~~a •. • ~. ~~. _,..-, 10Q5