Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1
STATE OF FLORIDA RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl, 32399-2100 -(850) 488-8466 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning council, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR., the undersigned authorized representative of PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, the Applicant submits the following information concerning the PARK PLACE DRI development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City"), to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), and to the Bureau of Resource Management, Department of Community Affairs ("DCA" ). ( ate) Timoth A. Jo nson, Jr. Authorized Representative for Park Place Land, Ltd. 2. Applicant: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Phone (305) 860-8188 Fax: (305) 860-8196 3. Authorized Agent: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 4. Location of approved DR[ and proposed change: A portion of Section -17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"). 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. The Applicant is filing this Notice of Proposed Change Application to (i) reduce approved office and retail space; (ii) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Parcel 6") for multi-family and/or hotel uses; and (iii) extend the buildout date by three (3) years to December 31, 2003. The following paragraphs describe the proposed changes in more detail. -2- Reduction of Office and Retail S A revised Park Place DRI Master Development Plan, Map H, dated September 18, 2000, is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" ("Revised Map H"). As shown on Revised Map H, the land use schedule has been revised to reduce approved office and retail space. The following table provides a comparison of the currently approved land uses and the proposed uses: LAND USE COMPARISON LAND USES APPROVED' > USES PROPOSED, ' USES _ NET INCREASE/DECREASE Retail/Commercial 150,000 sq. ft. 81,120 sq. ft. (68,880 sq. ft.) Office 635,680 sq. ft.' 404,639 sq. ft. (234,041.00 sq. ft.) Lt. Industrial 200,000 sq. ft. 200,000 sq. ft. -0- Multi-family Residential 390 dwelling units 390 dwelling units -0- Approved office of 795,520 sq. ft. was reduced by 159,840 sq. ft., which was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units, pursuant to conversion factor set forth in Ordinance No. 5722-95. Conversion Factor. The Applicant is requesting approval of a trade-off mechanism to allow the Developer to convert office development allocated to Parcel 6 to multi-family, and/or hotel development. The Applicant proposes conversion factors for Parcel 6 which are designed to balance P.M. peak hour external vehicle trips, based on the results of the Park Place 2000 NOPC Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Florida Design Consultants attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C" (the "Traffic Analysis"). The proposed conversion factors are (i) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.4 multi-family units and (ii) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.44 hotel rooms. The conversion factors are shown in detail on Page 6 of the Traffic Analysis. The converted uses, if any, will be restricted to Parcel 6, which has a land use designation of Residential/Office/Retail allowing office, residential and hotel uses. Notwithstanding the proposed conversion factors, the existing land use plan designation limits (i) the maximum multi-family density on Parcel 6 to 18 units per gross acre, a maximum of 111 units (6.16 acres X 18 units per acre) and (ii) the maximum hotel density on Parcel 6 to 30 rooms per gross acre, a maximum of 185 -3- rooms. The Applicant proposes to set forth these development limitations in the amended Development Order. The development of hotel and/or office will not exceed density or floor area ratios established by the City's Land Development Code. As evidenced in the Traffic Analysis: (i) Any conversion of Parcel 6 development, as proposed, will increase the internal capture and decrease the directional traffic impact as compared to office development of Parcel 6; and (ii) The proposed uses, when fully built, represent a 34.1 percent reduction in PM peak hour external trips when compared to the approved development plan. Extension of Buildout Date. The Applicant requests a three-year extension of buildout of the DRI from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2003. As evidenced by the Traffic Analysis, the proposed extension does not necessitate additional roadway improvements beyond those set forth in the approved Development Order. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The revised conceptual plan for Park Place is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." 6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, please indicate no change. The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart is Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e. any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Chart). The DRI Development Order was originally adopted by the City of Clearwater, Florida, as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983, amended by -4- Ordinance No. 3287-83, adopted October 20, 1983, and readopted December 8, 1983, amended by Ordinance No. 5142-91, adopted December 19, 1991, amended by Ordinance No. 5722-95, adopted January 19, 1995, and amended by Ordinance No. 6107-96, adopted November 21, 1996. Ordinance No. 5142-91 amended the Development Order by (i) adding 200,000 square feet of industrial use and providing a maximum F.A.R. for the same; (ii) changing the phasing of the development from three phases to one phase with three subphases and revising conditions based on phasing; (iii) changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements; (iv) eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and (v) extending the build-out date by five (5) years. Ordinance No. 5722-95 amended the Development Order by (i) modifying the phasing of the Development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; (ii) decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extending the build-out date by four (4) years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; (v) adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; (vi) deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; (vii) restating all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. Ordinance No. 6107-96 amended the Development Order by (i) providing a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 allowing conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflecting certain changes in ownership. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? No. If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Not applicable. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development -5- order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use, and adjacent non- project land uses within '/Z mile on a project master site plan or other map. No additional lands have been purchased or optioned. 9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. No. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. Yes No X 10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. Yes. The proposed buildout date is December 31, 2003. 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. Parcel 6 is designated on the City of Clearwater Future Land Use Map as Residential/Office/Retail, a land use designation allowing retail/commercial, multi- family, hotel and office development. Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended development order, pursuant to Subsections 380.06(15), F.S., and 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code: 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(10)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order conditions and -6- requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, is applicable; d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. A proposed ordinance adopting the proposed change and setting forth the precise language proposed to be changed is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "D." Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H Exhibit "C" - Traffic Analysis Exhibit "D" - Ordinance Exhibit "E" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart 10/11/00 11:56 AM d-1 37413.95209 #103409 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE NOPC -7- EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 004'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. ORDINANCE NO. -00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED_ BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; REDUCING APPROVED OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER . NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to EXHIBIT "D" the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extend the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, and 6107-96, is a valid final development order within the provisions of 2 Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 6 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Reducing approved office and retail space; 2. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and 3. Extending the buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. 3 D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute :a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for 390 multi-family dwelling units and a total maximum floor area of 1,445,52-0 685,759 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795,52-0 404,639 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 4 150, = 81,120 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factors set forth in Subsection 4-A.A. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. C. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to either (i) 2.4 multi-family units or (ii) 2.44 hotel rooms are hereby established for the office area shown as Parcel 6 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: LAND USE TRADE-OFF RATES PARCEL 6 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT MAY BECONVERTED;To: 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.4 Multi-Family Units 1,000 sq. ft. Office 2.44 Hotel Rooms Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel 6 shall be limited as follows: MINIMUM MAXIMUM - Office 0* 100,000* Multi-Family 0** 111 ** Hotel 0** 185*** ' square feet of floor area units rooms D. The buildout date is hereby extended to December 31, 2003. E. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. F. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. 5 G. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. H. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian Aungst Mayor - Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H 10/11/00 12:02 PM d-1 37413.95209 #103377 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE ORD 6 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. -00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599:99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. -00 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 EXHIBIT „E„ ., PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART TYPE OF LAND USE 'CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE, Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space NIA NIA NIA # Spectators # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) NIA NIA NIA Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Hospitals # Beds N/A NIA NIA # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONZETERMINATION CHART (continued), TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA N/A N/A Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) Type of dwelling units office development on Multi-family # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONZETERMINATION CHART (continued), TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA N/A N/A Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) Type of dwelling units office development on Multi-family # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued), TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) 81,120 SF GFA 150,000 SF GFA None # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations Proposed amendment will allow -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Hotel/Motel # Rental Units office development on factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) additional parcel (Parcel 6) to development to convert to hotel. # Parking Spaces be converted to hotel # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, NIA N/A NIA easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations -4- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION. CHART (continued) ' TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Open Space Acreage No change proposed (All natural and Site locational changes vegetated non Type of open space impervious surfaces)IZI D.O. conditions ADA representations Preservation, Buffer or Acreage No change proposed Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 10111/0011:23 AM d-1 37413.95209 #223881 v1 - Park Place DRI/Sub Dev Cht 2000 -5- PARK PLACE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR PARK PLACE LAND LIMITED PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. SEPTEMBER 2000 FDC PROJECT # 172-07 PARK PLACE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Intersections B. Roadway Links III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS IV. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation B. Trip Distribution C. Delineation of Study Area D. Capacity Analysis VI. CONCLUSIONS Appendix A: HCS Intersection Analysis Existing Conditions Appendix B: FDOT ART-TAB Capacity Tables Appendix C: HCS Intersection Analysis Future Conditions Appendix D: Miscellaneous Information List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Project Trip Distribution I. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard immediately east of U.S. 19 (See Figure 1). Park Place (DRI # 92) was originally approved in 1983, to have a build-out in 1991 and contain 150,000 s.f of retail commercial space and 1,103,000 s.f. of office space. The development order was amended in 1994 and 1996 by two Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) to extend the build-out to 2000 and contain the following uses: Retail: Office: Lt. Industrial: 150,000 s.f.* 795,520 s.f.* 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office on parcel 4 The following development presently exists: Retail: Office: Lt. Industrial Apartment 81,120 s.f. 222,460 s.f. 100,000 s.f 390 d.u. The project is now being considered for a modification that would reduce the amount of approved office and retail space, extend the build-out date to December 31, 2003, and develop trade-off mechanisms for Parcel 6 to potentially convert office space to multi-family units or hotel rooms. This analysis will compare the transportation impacts of the approved development plan and those of the proposed development program. Specifically, three tests will be evaluated to determine the overall traffic impact reduction brought about by the revised development proposal and the revised build-out year. 1. A comparison of external trip generation. 2. A determination of whether traffic from the revised project plus background growth projected through 2003 will exceed that which was projected in the original ADA. 3. A determination of whether total traffic in the revised build-out year will result in roadway improvements that differ from those identified in the current Development Order. A transportation methodology was agreed to at a methodology meeting held at the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council on August 9, 2000. Letters of correspondence are included in Appendix D. ECT No. DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROJ172-07 DATE: FIGURE: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9/00 ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fa:: (727)724-8606 JJC II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ¦ Existing conditions were established by conducting traffic counts in July/August 2000. These included intersection turning movement counts and roadway segment counts. All traffic counts were ' converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. In addition, intersection geometrics and signal timings were obtained in the field and signal system timings were also obtained from the maintaining governmental agency. A. Intersections ' Using the peak hour/peak season volumes and the recorded geometrics, intersection capacity analyses were performed at each of the intersections using the 1997 Hi way Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures. As requested by TBRPC, a 2% heavy truck factor was used in signal analysis. The Highway Capacity Software (HCS) capaci ty worksheets and traffic count summaries are shown in Appendix A. The existing signalized intersection operations are shown below: Intersection Average Delay Intersection LOS (Sec.Neh.) S.R. 60/Hercules Avenue D 48.9 S.R. 60/Belcher Road F 148.6 S.R. 60/Old Coachman Road C 21.2 ' S.R. 60/U.S. 19 Ramps D 41.0 S.R. 60/West Entrance-Bennigan's Access B 14.1 S.R. 60/Park Place Boulevard C 20.8 ' S.R. 60/ Sky Harbor Drive A 7.0 S.R. 60/Hampton Road A 4.1 S.R. 60Bayside Bridge Ramps F 170.8 ' U.S. 19/Haines Bayshore F 114.6 U.S. 19Belleair Road F 95.2 U.S. 19/Nursery Road E 69.9 U. S. 19/Harn D 46.0 U.S. 19/Druid Road D 47.1 U.S. 19/Drew Street F 147.6 U.S. 19/S.R. 590 F 173.1 U.S. 19/Sunset Point Road F 147.6 Drew Street/Belcher Road E 73.8 Drew Street/Old Coachman Road E 64.7 Drew Street/Park Place Boulevard B 19.0 Drew Street/Hampton Road A 9.8 Drew Street/McMullen-Booth Road F 127.7 2 The Hampton Road/Island in the Sun MHP Access which is stop controlled was also analyzed. All movements presently operate at A or B. B. Roadwav Links ¦ Using the peak hour/peak season equivalent volumes, a capacity analysis was performed on each of the roadway links within the general vicinity of Park Place. All roadway link analysis was done on a directional basis. Roadway segment capacities were determined using the FDOT ART TAB Software and generalized tables. These capacity tables are included in Appendix B. Table 1 shows the existing peak hour conditions on area roadways surrounding Park Place. III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS As agreed to at the August 9, 2000, traffic methodology meeting, the following improvements are funded and are considered as committed within this analysis. PLANNED/PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway segment Improvement Construction Year Agency Drew Street (Highland - N.E. Coachman) Widen to 4LD 2000/01 FDOT #2570331 U.S. 19/Drew Street Interchange 2000/01 FDOT #2569571 U.S. 19 (S. of S.R. 590-N.of Sunset Point) Interchange 2002/03 FDOT #2568881 Keene Road (Druid to Drew) Widen to 6LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Drew - Sunset Point) Construct 4LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Sunset Point - Virginia) Widen to 4 LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920487 IV. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ' This segment of the report provides projections of background traffic for the build-out year (2003). As agreed to at the August 9, 2000, transportation methodology meeting, growth rates for area roadways were developed by comparing FSUTMS model volumes. Existing peak hour/peak season traffic was adjusted using screen-line growth rates of 0.35% (east of U.S. 19) and 0.88% (west of U.S. 19) which indicate the "built-out" nature of mid-Pinellas County. 3 TABLE 1 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFIC ANALYSIS EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS-2000 LOS D LOS D LANE PEAK HR MSFR MSFR LOS LOS Rf1AnWAV RFTA/CFKI Akin SR 60 KEENE ROAD HERCULES AVE 6L5 4594 2420 v2174 2960 v2730 D V . ?D.? SR 60 HERCULES AVE BELCHER ROAD 6LD 4263 2217 2046 2960 2730 C C SR 60 BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 6LD 4278 2244 2034 2960 2730 C C SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 4253 1789 2464 2730 2960 C D SR 60 US 19 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE 6LD 4303 1850 2453 2350 3100 D D SR 60 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE PARK PLACE DR 6LD 3984 1697 2287 2350 3100 C D SR 60 PARK PLACE DR SKY HARBOR 6LD 4010 1689 2321 2350 3100 C D SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4132 1763 2369 2350 3100 D D SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 6LD 4173 1710 2463 2350 3100 C D US 19 HAINES-BAYSHORE BELLEAIR RD 6LD 6924 4020 2904 4080 3210 D C US 19 BELLEAIR RD NURSERY RD 6LD 6546 3830 2716 4080 3210 D C US 19 NURSERY ROAD HARN BLVD 6LD 6716 3743 2973 4080 3210 D D US 19 HARN BLVD DRUID/SEVILLE 6LD 6763 3787 2976 4080 3210 D D US 19 DRUID/SEVILLE SR 60 6LD 6511 3689 2822 4080 3210 C C US 19 SR 60 DREW 6LFRWY- 6208 3799 2409 5080 3820 C C US 19 DREW ST SR 590 6LFRWY' 5956 3633 2323 5080 3820 C C US 19 SR 590 SUNSET POINT RD 6LFRWY' 5684 3638 2046 5080 3820 C C US 19 SUNSET POINT RD ENTERPRISE 6LD 5935 3950 1985 2780 2110 F C DREW STREET N.E.COACHMAN BELCHER ROAD 4LD 1742 1023 719 1760 1340 B B DREW STREET BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1918 979 939 1760 1340 B B DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 1998 927 1071 1340 1760 B B DREW STREET US 19 PARK PLACE DR 4LD 1678 943 735 1760 1340 B B DREW STREET DREW STREET PARK PLACE DR HAMPTON HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 4LD 1535 1421 826 824 709 597 1760 1760 1340 1340 B B B B SR 590 BELCHER ROAD US 19 2LU 1505 720 785 670 880 F C SR 590 US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 2LU 1533 721 812 670 880 F C SUNSET POINT ROAD BELCHER ROAD US 19 4LD 2311 1225 1086 1760 1340 C C SUNSET POINT ROAD US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 1722 744 978 1340 1760 B B BELCHER ROAD DRUID SR 60 4LD 2355 1331 1024 1760 1340 C C BELCHER ROAD SR 60 DREW STREET 4LD 2358 1313 1045 1760 1340 C C BELCHER ROAD DREW STREET N.E.COACHMAN 4LD 2498 1515 983 1760 1340 C C MCMULLEN-BOOTH SR 60 DREW STREET 6LD 5266 3212 2054 2640 2005 F F MCMULLEN-BOOTH DREW STREET SR 590 6L5 5438 3402 2036 2640 2005 F F BASED ON FDC TRAFFIC COUNTS JULY/AUGUST 2000 "NOTE: ASSUMES INTERCHANGES AT DREW, SR 590, SUNSET POINT AS COMMITTED V. FUTURE CONDITIONS This segment of the report provides estimates of vehicle trip generation, trip distribution, and analyzes operations with background traffic and with the project in-place for the build-out year (2003). A. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates were obtained from the ITE Trip Generation, 6' Edition. As was done in 1 all previous analysis, the retail space was analyzed using ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center), office space was analyzed using ITE Land Use Code 710 (Office Building), light industrial space was analyzed using ITE Land Use Code I10 (General Light Industrial) and the apartments were analyzed using ITE Land Use Code 220 (Apartments). A comparison of trip generation of the originally approved plan and the proposed development plan is shown in Table 2A. As shown in Table 2A the originally approved development plan would generate 2,318 PM peak hour external trips, whereas the proposed development plan would generate ' only 1,527 PM peak hour external trips, therefore, this change represents a 34.1% reduction in PM peak hour external vehicle trips. Based on a 15% internal capture, a 2.5% transit usage and retail pass by capture, the full project would result inl,279 external primary auto trips (380 entering/899 exiting). Pass- by traffic (210 trips) represents only 5.2% of adjacent peak hour traffic on S.R. 60. At this time portions of the development have been constructed and, therefore, already contribute I to the existing traffic stream. Presently 81,120 square feet of retail space, 222,460 square feet of office space, 100,000 square feet of light industrial space and 390 multi-family dwelling units exist. The traffic generation estimates of existing project traffic based on ITE Trip Generation, 6`' Edition is shown in Table 2B. To avoid double counting, and per the methodology, trips generated by the built areas were subtracted from the total trip generation estimates to arrive at additional project traffic expected by unbuilt portions of the total project. B. Trip Distribution/Traffic Assignment Distribution and assignment of the full project 1,279 external primary trips to the surrounding roadway system was based on the Year 2010 FSUTMS regional model as approved at the August 9, 2000 transportation methodology meeting. The distribution percentages are shown in Figure 2. C. Delineation of Stud Area The project impact area (study area) includes all roadway segments where external primary peak hour trips (project traffic) comprises 4.5% or more of the LOS D directional peak hour "Maximum ' Service Flow Rate" (MSFR). Signalized intersections where project traffic comprises 4.5% or more of the intersection capacity were also included. The study area calculations are shown in Table 3 and are based on external primary trips from the entire DRI which is 1,279 external primary auto trips (380 entering/899 exiting). TABLE 2A PARK PLACE DRI ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPROVED PLAN TRIP GENERATION LAND ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAl USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT OFFIC E 710 198,000 S.F 2242 301 30 271 46 225 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 150,000 S.F 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFIC E 710 480,000 S.F 4427 617 62 555 94 461 OFFIC E 710 125,000 S.F 1575 219 22 197 34 163 RETAIL 820 135,000 S.F 8267 765 76 689 331 358 RETAIL 820 15,000 S.F. 2012 180 18 162 78 84 TOTAL 22147 2576 258 2318 659 1659 PROPOSED AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNALEXTERNA PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS INTERNAL EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 10 186 23 163 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 71 158 106 52 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F 2436 327 16 311 53 258 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 97 327 157 170 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 8 163 28 135 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 59 198 95 103 TOTAL 16300 1797 270 1527 493 ln34 WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS EXTERNAL AUTO ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F 1394 196 186 181 22 159 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 158 154 103 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F 2436 327 311 303 52 251 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 327 319 153 166 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 163 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 198 193 93 100 TOTAL 16300 1797 1527 1489 481 lnns WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL AUTO TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO AUTO PARCEL # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS AUTO TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 ST 1394 196 181 181 22 159 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 154 154 103 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F 2436 327 303 303 52 251 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 319 188 90 98 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 159 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 193 114 55 59 TOTAL 16300 1797 1489 1279 380 899 NOTES: 1. BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION, 6TH EDITION 2. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASSBY TRIPS 3. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 1998 AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 4. RETAIL SPACE IS AS ACTUALLY EXISTS AND TOTALS 81,120 S.F. 5. TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT IS 1,279 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS (380 ENTERING/899 EXITING) TABLE 2B PARK PLACE DRI TRIP GENERATION OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAI PARCEL # LAND USE LUG UNITS 1 KIPS 1 KINS IN I tKNAL to 1 tKNAL tN I tK tAl 1 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 5 93 11 82 20 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 46 183 123 60 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 11 203 35 168 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 85 339 163 176 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 51 206 99 107 TnTAI 13558 1415 207 1208 462 746 WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5%a PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL PARCEL # LAND USE LUG UNI 15 I KIPS I KINS to l tKNAL AU 1 U tN I tK LAI 1 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 93 91 11 80 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 183 178 119 59 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 203 198 34 164 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 339 330 159 171 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 206 200 96 104 TnTAI 13558 1415 1208 1177 450 727 WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL AUTO TRIPS ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO AUTO nRCE # LAND USE LUC UNITS TRIPS TRIPS AUTO TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 91 91 11 80 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 178 178 119 59 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 198 198 34 164 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 330 195 94 101 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S,F 2856 257 200 118 57 61 Tl1TA1 13558 1415 1177 960 346 614 NOTES: 1. BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION, 6TH EDITION 2. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASSBY TRIPS 3. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 1998 AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 4. RETAIL SPACE IS AS ACTUALLY EXISTS AND TOTALS 81,120 S.F. 5. EXISTING PROJECT IMPACT IS 960 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS (346 ENTERING/614 EXITING) DESCRIPTION: PROJECT No. PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 172_07 DATE: FIGURE: 4 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9/00 ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 2 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC TABLE 3 STUDY AREA DELINEATION PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT ON ROADWAYS UNBUILT (BASED ON 1279 EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS) ENTER 380 34 EXIT 899 285 TOTAL 1279 319 PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT LOS D LOS D LOS D PERCENT PERCENT UNBUILT UNBUILT PROJECT PROJECT LANE TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS MSFR RnAnWAV RCTA/CCAI AKlm - T..,....,... ....?.. ---••- --.-.-.--- MSFR MSFR ---.-- LOS D LOS D STUDY TRAFFIC TRAFFIC SR 60 KEENE -- HERCULES 6LD 166 49 --w 117 vvv-vvnl I 5 690 iNO/Mo 2 960 Jo/vvo 2 730 ive+/tb 1 67% Jtl/vv6 4 28% AREA NB/EB SB/WB SR 60 HERCULES BELCHER 'RD 205 61 144 , 5,690 , 2,960 , 2,730 . 2.05% . 5.27% YES 4 5 37 46 SR 60 BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 6LD 256 76 180 5,690 2,960 2,730 2.57% 6.59% YES 7 57 SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 281 84 198 5,690 2,730 2,960 3.06% 6.68% YES 7 63 SR 60 US19 BENNIGANS 6LD 486 144 342 5,450 2,350 3,100 6.14% 11.02% YES 13 108 SR 60 BENNIGANS PARK PLACE 6LD 486 144 342 5,450 2,350 3,100 6.14% 11.02% YES 13 108 SR 60 PARKPLACE SKYHARBOR 6LD 200 150 50 5,450 2,350 3,100 6.38% 1.61% YES 40 0 SR 60 SKYHARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 200 150 50 5,450 2,350 3,100 6.38% 1.61% YES 40 0 SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 6LD 256 180 76 5,450 2,350 3,100 7.65% 2.45% YES 57 7 SR60 MCMULLEN-BOOTH BAYSHORE 6LD 77 54 23 5,450 2,350 3,100 2.30% 0.74% 17 2 US 19 HAINES-BAYSHORE BELLEAIR 6LD 128 38 90 7,290 4,080 3,210 0.93% 2.80% 3 29 US 19 BELLEAIR NURSERY 6LD 141 42 99 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.02% 3.08% 4 31 US 19 NURSERY HARN 6LD 179 53 126 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.30% 3.92% 5 40 US 19 HARN DRUID/SEVILLE 6LD 179 53 126 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.30% 3.92% 5 40 US 19 DRUID/SEVILLE SR 60 6LD 205 61 144 7,290 4,080 3,210 1.490/. 4.48% 5 46 US 19 SR 60 DREW 6LFWY 0 0 0 8,900 5,080 3,820 0.000/0 0.00% 0 0 US 19 DREW SR 590 6LFWY 281 198 84 8,900 5,080 3,820 3.89% 2.19% 63 7 US 19 SR 590 SUNSET POINT 6LFWY 243 171 72 8,900 5,080 3,820 3.36% 1.89% 54 6 US 19 SUNSET POINT ENTERPRISE 6LD 141 99 42 4,890 2,780 2,110 3.56% 1.98% 31 4 BELLEAIR US 19 BELCHER 2LU 13 4 9 1,330 570 760 0.67% 1.18% 0 3 NURSERY US 19 BELCHER 2LU 26 8 18 1,330 570 760 1.33% 2.370/. 1 6 DREW N.E. COACHMAN BELCHER 4LD 64 19 45 3,100 1,760 1,340 1.08% 3.35% 2 14 DREW BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 4LD 102 30 72 3,100 1,760 1,340 1.73% 5.37% YES 3 23 DREW OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 115 34 81 3,100 1,340 1,760 2.55% 4.60% YES 3 26 DREW US 19 PARK PLACE 4LD 396 118 279 3,100 1,760 1,340 6.69% 20.80% YES 11 88 DREW PARK PLACE HAMPTON 4LD 102 72 30 3,100 1,760 1,340 4.09% 2.27% 23 3 DREW HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 102 72 30 3,100 1,760 1,340 4.09% 2 27% 23 3 SR 590 BELCHER US 19 2LU 13 4 9 1,550 670, 880 0.57% . 1.02% 0 3 SR 590 US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 2LU 26 18 8 1,550 67011111 880 2.68% 0.86% 6 1 SUNSET POINT BELCHER US 19 4LD 51 15 36 3,100 1,760 1,340 0.86% 2 68% 1 11 SUNSET POINT US 19 MCMULLEN-BOOTH 4LD 38 27 11 3,100 1 340 1 760 2 01% . 0 65% 9 BELCHER DRUID SR 60 4LD 51 15 36 3,100 , 1,760 , 1,340 . 0.86% . 2.68% 1 1 11 BELCHER SR 60 DREW 4LD 13 4 9 3,100 1,760 1,340 0.22% 0.67% 0 3 BAYSIDE BRIDGE ROOSEVELT SR 60 6LFWY 179 53 126. 8,900 5,080 3,820 1.05% 3.29% 5 40 MCMULLEN BOOTH DREW SR 590 6LD 64 45 101 4,645 2,640 2,005 1.70% 0.95% 14 2 Although the proposed project has a total impact of 1,279 external primary auto trips during the PM peak hour, 960 of these trips (346 entering/614 exiting) are from existing buildings, therefore, the 1 project will result in an additional 319 external primary auto trips (34 entering/285 exiting). D. Capaci Analysis As confirmed by Table 3 the project impact area includes portions of S.R. 60 (Hercules Avenue to McMullen-Booth Road) and portions of Drew Street (Belcher Road to Park Place Boulevard). Additional unbuilt project traffic was added to accumulated background traffic throughout the year 2003. The projected 2003 total volume was compared to the 1991 volume predicted in the original ADA, and this comparison is shown in Table 4. Roadways where previously analyzed volumes were I not exceeded by the 2003 projected volumes are not subject to further analysis since no additional impact is created and since the impacts are mitigated by the Development Order. Due to the build- out extension to 2003, total expected volume exceeds the predicted volume on only the following roadway segments: S.R.60 (Park Place Blvd - Sky Harbor Drive) S.R. 60 (Sky Harbor Drive - Hampton Road) S.R. 60 (Hampton Road - McMullen-Booth Road) Drew Street (Belcher Road - Old Coachman Road) ' Drew Street (Old Coachman Road - U.S. 19) Total 2003 projected traffic volumes and expected levels of service are shown in Table 5. As shown, all roadway segments that are significantly impacted would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service and in particular those segments listed above where there is increased volume would continue to operate acceptably. The intersections where project traffic comprised 4.5% or more of the intersection capacity were analyzed to include background traffic, and project added traffic. The HCM intersections analysis worksheets are shown in Appendix C and the resulting levels of service are shown below. Intersection Average Delay Intersection LOS (Sec.Neh.) S.R. 60/U.S. 19 Ramps D 42.6 S.R. 60/Bennigan's Drive B 19.0 S.R. 60/Park Place C 23.8 Drew St/U.S. 19* F 158.3 Drew St/Park Place Blvd D 40.4 Hampton Rd/Bausch & Lomb Drive AB 7.9/10.4 Hampton Rd/Parcel 6 Drive A/A 7.4/9.1 *As specified in the Development Order, a grade separated interchange will be required at the U.S. 19/Drew Street intersection. With the interchange the intersection of Drew Street / US 19 Ramps would operate at LOS D. 5 = r m mm r m m m? m m m m m ,m m m m TABLE 4 PARK PLACE DRI NOPC TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1991 1991 1991 2003 2003 2003 2003 ORIGINAL BUILDOUT BUILDOUT ORIGINAL BUILDOUT BUILDOUT BUILDOUT LANE VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME GREATER RnnnWAY ROTA/CCIJ Anin SR 60 HERCULES BELCHER ROAD 6LD 5435 2660 2775 4427 IYOICD 2281 OG/VVO 2146 IIVIYHIi I NO SR 60 BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 6LD 5040 2455 2585 4456 2311 2145 NO SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 5545 2830 2715 4437 1844 2593 NO SR 60 US 19 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE 6LD 6360 2945 3415 4437 1882 2587 NO SR 60 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE PARK PLACE BLVD 6LD 5080 2200 2880 4188 1728 2419 NO SR 60 PARK PLACE BLVD SKY HARBOR 6LD 4340 2145 2195 4163 1747 2345 YES SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4450 2205 2245 4240 1822 2394 YES SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-B001H 6LD 4465 2305 2160 4281 1785 2496 YES DREW STREET BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1885 980 905 1995 1008 987 YES DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 2045 975 1070 1706 955 1126 YES DREW STREET US 19 PARK PLACE DR 4LD 2740 1520 1220 1795 964 831 10 TABLE 5 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT - 2003 BACKGRD. TRAFFIC PROJECT TRAFFIC TOTAL TOTAL EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING 2003 2003 ADDED ADDED 2003 2003 LOS D LOSD ^'^ LANE RnenlnleV ..,..PM._ ..PM- _PM PM- PM PM PM PM PM MSFR MSFR LOS LOS ocr?niccr.i ?....? ...-•- .._- _ SR 60 HERCULES AVE BELCHER ROAD 6LD 4263 2217 2046 2276 2100 5 -1-D 46 nDIcD 2281 aDrvvD 2146 ND/ttl 2960 SH/W8 2730 N8/E8 D 58/W8 D SR 60 BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 6LD 4278 2244 2034 2304 2088 7 57 2311 2145 2960 2730 D D SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 4253 1789 2464 1837 2530 7 63 1844 2593 2730 2960 C D SR 60 US 19 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE 6LD 4303 1850 2453 1869 2479 13 108 1882 2587 2350 3100 D D SR 60 BENNIGAN'S DRIVE PARK PLACE 6LD 3984 1697 2287 1715 2311 13 108 1728 2419 2350 3100 D D SR 60 PARK PLACE SKY HARBOR 6LD 4010 1689 2321 1707 2345 40 0 1747 2345 2350 3100 D D SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4132 1763 2369 1782 2394 40 0 1822 2394 2350 3100 D D SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN-BOOTH 6LD 4173 1710 2463 1728 2489 57 7 1785 2496 2350 3100 D D DREW STREET BELCHER ROAD OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1918 979 939 1005 964 3 23 1008 987 1760 1340 B C DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 1998 927 1071 952 1100 3 26 955 1126 1340 1760 C B DREW STREET US 19 PARK PLACE 4LD 1678 943 735 953_ 1 743 11 88 964 831 1760 1340 B B BASED ON FDC TRAFFIC COUNTS JULY/AUGUST 2000 BASED ON SCREENLINE GROWTH RATES INCLUDES ADDITIONAL (UNBUILT) PROJECT TRAFFIC ONLY 1 VI. CONCLUSION ' The Park Place DRI when fully built-out will contain 81,120 square feet retail space, 404,639 square feet of office space, 200,000 square feet of light industrial space and 390 multi-family dwelling units. Trip generation cstimates for the entire project indicate a total of 1,527 PM peak hour external trips. ' This represents a 34.1 % reduction in PM peak hour external trips when compared to the approved development plan. Due to this reduction and scheduled roadway improvements, the impact area is greatly reduced. With the extension of project build-out to 2003, total traffic volume in the revised t build-out year will exceed previously predicted volume on a limited number ofroadway segments. All roadway segments significantly impacted would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service and all signalized intersections significantly impacted would continue to operate at ' acceptable levels of service. As such, no additional roadway improvements above and beyond those identified in the Development Order are necessitated. Therefore, the proposed change would not constitute a 'substantial deviation" from a transportation perspective as per FS 380.06(19)(b)(15)_ ' Regarding conversion factors for converting office space to multi-family units or hotel rooms on Parcel 6, the following conversion factors are recommended- Office's may be converted to hotel rooms at a rate of 1,000 s.f. = 2.44 hotel rooms for a maximum of 244 rooms. Office may be converted to multi family units at a rate of 1,000 s.f_ = 2.40 units with a maximum of 240 units- These are based on the following trip generation rates.: n u Office =1.49 trips/1,000 s.£ Hotel = 0.61 trips/room Multi-family = 0.62 trips/unit Conversion from office to either hotel or multi-family would increase the internal capture and decrease the directional traffic impact as compared to this analysis of 100,000 s.f. of office space on Parcel 6. 1 V_\PARY PLACE V"oRT.DAT 6 APPENDIX A ITEM PAGE Traffic Count Summary A-1 Traffic Count U.S. 19, North of Ham Blvd A-2 to A-4 Traffic Count U.S. 19, North of Drew St. A-5 to A-7 Traffic Count U.S. 19, South of Sunset Point Rd. A-8 to A-10 Traffic Count Drew St, East of Hampton Rd A-11 to A13 Traffic Count Gulf-to-Bay Blvd, East of Hercules Ave A-14 to A-16 Traffic Count Gulf-to-Bay Blvd, East of U.S. 19 A-17 to A-19 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Hercules Ave A-20 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Belcher Rd A-21 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Old Coachman Rd A-22 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/U.S. 19 Ramps A-23 HCS S.R. 60Benningan's Drive A-24 HCS S.R. 60/Park Place Blvd A-25 HCS S.R. 60/Sky Harbor Dr. A-26 HCS S.R. 60/Hampton Rd A-27 HCS Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/McMullen-Booth Ramps A-28 HCS U.S. 19/Haines Bayshore A-29 HCS U.S. 19Belleair Rd A-30 HCS U.S. 19/Nursery Rd A-31 HCS U.S. 19/Harn Blvd A-32 HCS U.S. 19/Druid/Seville A-33 HCS U.S. 19/Drew St A-34 HCS U.S. 19/N.E. Coachman A-35 HCS U.S. 19/Sunset Point Rd A-36 HCS Drew St/Belcher Rd A-37 HCS Drew St/Old Coachman Rd A-38 HCS Drew St/Park Place A-39 HCS Drew St/Hampton Rd A-40 HCS Drew St/McMullen-Booth Rd A-41 HCS Hampton RdBaush & Lomb/Island in the Sun MHP A-42 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY 1. U.S. 19 (North of Ham Blvd) 3-Day Average ADT 77,741 AADT 77,733 K1oo = 0.087 2. U.S. 19 (North of Drew Street) 3-Day Average ADT 71,663 AADT 70,903 Kioo= 0.084 3. U.S. 19 (South of Sunset Point Road) 3-Day Average ADT 70,059 AADT 69,316 Kioo = 0.082 4. Drew Street (East of Hampton Road) 3-Day Average ADT 15,656 AADT 15,969 Kioo = 0.089 5. Gulf-To-Bay Blvd (East of Hercules) 3-Day Average ADT 52,013 AADT 51,992 K1oo = 0.082 6. Gulf-To-Bay Blvd (East of U.S.19) 3-Day Average ADT 49,476 AADT 49,456 Kioo = 0.087 -I A-2- Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/17/00 Page: 1 Site Reference: 172-07 File: es\itc\e.prn Site ID: PARK PLACE User: Location: US 19 N. OF HARN BLVD., CLEARWATER Direction: NORTH TIME MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 17 18 19 20 21 Lane 1 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00:15 108 571 00:30 107 586 00:45 92 611 01:00 89 573 01:15 84 583 01:30 70 612 01:45 71 565 02:00 48 56 568 02:15 510 46 596 02:30 559 61 553 02:45 549 34 537 03:00 596 35 620 03:15 619 36 631 03:30 631 25 611 03:45 637 37 670 04:00 777 29 750 04:15 741 31 645 04:30 798 35 857 04:45 770 39 798 05:00 923 34 840 05:15 878 50 898 05:30 1011 49 924 05:45 981 72 929 06:00 932 118 06:15 834 151 901 06:30 799 176 856 06:45 755 226 720 07:00 635 293 616 07:15 536 381 547 07:30 564 338 498 07:45 502 424 490 08:00 433 551 386 08:15 399 562 366 08:30 382 558 352 08:45 417 496 359 09:00 331 573 297 09:15 278 557 286 09:30 320 473 294 09:45 312 468 278 10:00 246 477 246 10:15 255 423 254 10:30 277 434 302 10:45 236 448 290 11:00 206 436 232 11:15 223 445 170 11:30 225 492 148 11:45 225 518 153 12:00 144 503 148 ------------------------------- TOTALS 21494 37383 AM Times 8:15 AM Peaks 2189 116 575 114 615 101 618 74 574 81 628 66 623 50 539 53 562 43 561 66 497 50 506 27 598 33 589 24 614 24 648 22 753 29 656 37 811 22 821 43 828 37 846 41 943 69 91 99 890 134 810 177 833 216 635 283 607 296 524 328 456 390 481 467 404 468 430 513 356 532 363 515 273 578 322 429 298 459 289 440 252 474 239 467 258 403 231 455 170 469 151 499 163 489 162 502 146 36366 8:30 2138 110 550 117 612 102 580 76 559 87 602 76 571 69 522 67 584 54 534 46 515 40 522 26 603 27 560 28 603 15 645 26 711 24 601 31 678 21 900 33 777 42 826 47 917 67 893 77 835 114 795 150 719 175 642 236 565 305 502 347 494 347 462 445 404 493 392 473 355 464 322 483 256 483 259 406 296 426 319 415 240 408 221 414 217 456 229 423 150 426 134 455 165 473 138 540 122 34763 8:15 1913 96 573 430 2269 107 567 96 670 434 2483 108 620 80 597 375 2406 93 601 75 595 314 2301 78 575 73 573 325 2386 81 596 63 552 275 2358 68 589 69 525 259 2151 64 537 49 544 225 2306 56 461 47 338 190 2539 47 507 65 238 2124 59 531 18 142 2114 35 528 38 126 2417 31 604 21 117 2399 29 599 31 108 2459 27 614 17 93 2600 23 650 24 101 2991 25 747 25 109 2643 27 660 28 131 3144 32 786 21 103 3289 25 822 25 135 3368 33 842 44 173 3448 43 862 31 168 3795 42 948 58 266 3717 66 929 75 369 3512 92 878 109 508 3340 127 835 142 645 3207 161 801 197 814 2752 203 688 226 1038 2423 259 605 272 1254 2109 313 527 276 1289 2012 322 503 330 1491 1935 372 483 384 1847 1627 461 406 453 1976 1587 494 396 451 1995 1445 498 361 451 1943 1461 485 365 467 2038 1157 509 289 441 2059 1145 514 286 414 1722 1208 430 302 457 1810 1198 452 299 422 1754 984 438 246 408 1713 969 428 242 427 1742 1054 435 263 458 1765 986 441 246 376 1690 758 422 189 445 1785 678 446 169 460 1906 701 476 175 522 2002 678 500 169 527 2072 560 518 140 --------------------------------------------------- 15251 0 0 145257 36033 11.15 1954 PM Times 17:15 17:30 17:15 17:15 12:15 PM Peaks 3802 3609 3593 3471 2435 A-3 Site Reference: 172-07 Site ID: PARK PLACE Location: US 19 N. OF HARN BL% TIME MON TUE 17 18 Lane 2 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 98 591 00:30 79 626 00:45 88 643 01:00 46 656 01:15 63 618 01:30 46 607 01:45 46 673 02:00 30 41 635 02:15 223 44 615 02:30 228 38 610 02:45 223 33 662 03:00 245 33 637 03:15 222 25 607 03:30 240 30 629 03:45 216 33 708 04:00 258 52 706 04:15 245 38 613 04:30 275 46 621 04:45 244 71 736 05:00 227 109 681 05:15 244 82 659 05:30 314 139 725 05:45 298 224 673 06:00 288 304 599 06:15 249 350 602 06:30 271 457 558 06:45 208 656 531 07:00 182 790 542 07:15 180 785 498 07:30 204 897 481 07:45 153 944 424 08:00 146 903 418 08:15 135 862 457 08:30 135 864 424 08:45 119 810 427 09:00 150 676 410 09:15 115 511 451 09:30 133 531 394 09:45 103 569 369 10:00 99 514 331 10:15 101 542 306 10:30 80 506 271 10:45 70 550 216 11:00 59 542 202 11:15 49 588 172 11:30 59 536 172 11:45 57 525 131 12:00 31 580 115 ------------------------------- TOTALS 7108 41728 AM Times 7:30 AM Peaks 3606 PM Times 17:30 16:45 PM Peaks 1149 2801 Florida Design Consultants Inc 'D., CLEARWI WED 19 am pm 104 605 74 625 97 680 52 627 64 631 49 327 50 677 46 651 47 582 36 589 34 653 42 628 19 612 35 646 32 692 50 689 37 618 42 608 76 70 105 684 85 644 133 749 239 658 304 584 353 574 453 533 642 521 757 505 786 472 921 476 926 433 862 426 851 466 861 405 801 419 683 435 522 450 505 391 568 419 504 309 544 312 488 301 550 238 575 206 584 175 567 198 507 134 565 120 41310 7:30 3560 16:45 2783 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/17/00 File: es\itc\e.prn User: ffER Direction: SOUTH THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 20 21 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------- 110 628 47 245 359 2069 89 517 83 616 29 189 265 2056 66 514 95 651 24 223 304 2197 76 549 58 662 23 280 179 2225 44 556 69 635 18 257 214 2141 53 535 46 619 21 231 162 1784 40 446 48 682 25 245 169 2277 42 569 53 642 8 255 148 2213 37 442 50 614 13 163 154 2197 38 439 33 592 19 126 2019 31 504 36 649 6 109 2187 27 546 36 653 7 118 2163 29 540 27 598 7 78 2039 19 509 29 619 9 103 2134 25 533 37 698 9 111 2314 27 578 51 703 10 163 2356 40 589 35 620 12 122 2096 30 524 41 618 12 141 2122 35 530 69 729 9 225 2415 56 603 106 691 25 345 2283 86 570 85 668 20 272 2215 68 553 129 25 426 2527 106 631 236 681 51 750 2310 187 577 285 601 79 972 2072 243 518 344 581 89 1136 2006 284 501 451 543 110 1471 1905 367 476 641 528 189 2128 1788 532 447 550 539 258 2355 1768 588 442 762 501 265 2598 1651 649 412 937 479 314 3069 1640 767 410 954 419 339 3163 1429 790 357 889 408 390 3044 1398 761 349 822 441 384 2919 1499 729 374 849 415 369 2943 1379 735 344 804 439 351 2766 1404 691 351 714 421 297 2370 1416 592 354 680 459 273 1986 1475 496 368 504 401 229 1769 1319 442 329 498 381 183 1818 1272 454 318 530 339 166 1714 1078 428 269 545 310 190 1821 1029 455 257 485 287 200 1679 939 419 234 519 220 200 1819 744 454 186 580 208 221 1918 675 479 168 572 186 203 1947 582 486 145 561 180 198 1862 609 465 152 526 135 212 1770 457 442 114 561 121 218 1924 387 481 96 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 41674 8444 0 0 140264 34805 7:30 8:00 /V Ji-8 %U ( 3602 1494 ? .,e.e 16:45 13:00 '/- 359! 273ff 932.E ='S 2827 1013 ?Z . s 6 353 :2 795 Z-0 * 2-7 T = ?5-C Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: US 19, N. OF DREW ST TIME MON TUE 31 1 Lane 1 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 132 508 00:30 133 642 00:45 122 608 01:00 76 627 01:15 95 645 01:30 72 658 01:45 69 604 02:00 67 611 02:15 44 654 02:30 573 63 630 02:45 547 41 655 03:00 536 30 682 03:15 657 32 702 03:30 585 45 619 03:45 627 36 726 04:00 757 20 829 04:15 642 26 816 04:30 642 44 786 04:45 782 27 7 0 05:00 822 48 891 05:15 832 26 855 05:30 748 47 860 05:45 886 64 908 06:00 808 107 873 06:15 710 133 822 06:30 752 158 817 06:45 799 227 880 07:00 729 308 707 07:15 536 332 567 07:30 549 329 638 07:45 567 426 560 08:00 451 413 486 08:15 457 508 438 08:30 497 452 455 08:45 466 507 473 09:00 436 491 408 09:15 367 610 129 09:30 395 427 123 09:45 288 442 201 10:00 295 544 313 10:15 252 505 239 10:30 295 449 307 10:45 210 539 214 11:00 179 522 241 11:15 173 492 258 11:30 191 539 229 11:45 174 566 172 12:00 116 547 135 ------------------------------- TOTALS 20328 38903 AM Times 11:15 AM Peaks 2144 PM Times 17:00 17:00 PM Peaks 3288 3514 Florida Design Consultants Inc WED 2 am pm 130 585 113 604 122 491 83 594 67 592 73 574 72 599 45 579 58 580 60 663 52 610 58 626 44 607 49 579 30 711 33 744 24 705 33 842 39 829 30 844 55 773 60 933 70 833 104 664 133 645 145 670 199 579 305 704 317 527 297 564 402 542 376 486 458 457 498 485 482 457 476 380 563 441 457 376 482 367 508 308 485 277 461 298 472 263 508 257 477 238 467 241 589 213 530 182 37709 11:15 2063 17:00 3383 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/31/0 File: i\19drew.prn User: Direction: NORTH THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------------- 144 611 0 406 1704 101 568 132 666 0 378 1912 94 637 135 605 0 379 1704 94 568 111 592 0 270 1813 67 604 99 699 0 261 1936 65 645 95 660 0 240 1892 60 630 66 613 0 207 1816 51 605 61 610 0 173 1800 43 600 60 674 0 162 1908 40 636 67 670 0 190 2536 47 634 48 636 0 141 2448 35 612 45 619 0 133 2463 33 615 41 657 0 117 2623 29 655 38 585 0 132 2368 33 592 36 627 0 102 2691 25 672 44 757 0 97 3087 24 771 30 642 0 80 2805 20 701 35 642 0 112 2912 28 728 45 782 0 111 3163 27 790 33 822 0 111 3379 27 844 47 832 0 128 3292 32 823 47 748 0 154 3289 38 822 61 886 0 195 3513 48 878 98 808 0 309 3153 77 788 124 710 0 390 2887 97 721 170 348 0 473 2587 118 646 208 130 0 634 2388 158 597 301 976 0 914 3116 228 779 295 935 0 944 2565 236 641 335 779 0 961 2530 240 632 327 849 0 1155 2518 288 629 441 736 0 1230 2159 307 539 442 636 0 1408 1988 352 497 457 760 0 1407 2197 351 549 449 676 0 1438 2072 359 518 604 649 0 1571 1873 392 468 516 619 2 1691 1556 422 389 485 585 0 1369 1479 342 369 397 558 1321 1414 440 353 507 497 1559 1413 519 353 454 523 1444 1291 481 322 495 483 1405 1383 468 345 504 436 1515 1123 505 280 488 413 1518 1090 506 272 469 298 1438 967 479 241 482 191 1488 852 496 213 588 174 1743 733 581 183 563 116 1640 549 546 137 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 41239 2 0 0 138181 37140 11:15 8:30 2102 2 19:00 3539 Site Reference: PAR Site ID: 172-07 Location: US 19, N. TIME MON 31 Lane 2 am pm ------------------- 00:15 00:30 00:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 436 02:45 616 03:00 555 03:15 517 03:30 523 03:45 455 04:00 538 04:15 548 04:30 570 04:45 523 05:00 541 05:15 570 05:30 580 05:45 611 06:00 491 06:15 535 06:30 535 06:45 444 07:00 379 07:15 397 07:30 385 07:45 385 08:00 301 08:15 288 08:30 326 08:45 279 09:00 319 09:15 297 09:30 345 09:45 304 10:00 245 10:15 214 10:30 202 10:45 160 11:00 160 11:15 141 11:30 135 11:45 98 12:00 89 -------------------- TOTALS 15037 AM Times TM De?Y PM Times 17:00 ?PM Peaks 2302 K PLACE OF DREW ST TUE 1 am pm 92 526 70 516 55 460 58 477 48 619 35 470 49 486 23 549 35 485 24 507 23 544 26 511 19 499 30 595 24 510 48 547 39 570 48 541 47 530 88 36 80 527 116 610 201 599 333 0 252 585 444 542 582 467 619 374 654 349 773 405 748 307 795 305 819 254 745 267 633 263 599 277 524 194 510 257 432 219 414 216 480 149 477 185 511 147 474 133 492 129 445 117 439 101 552 88 ------------ 34078 7:30 '211m Flox WED 2 am pm 66 499 52 404 52 379 55 445 39 420 27 423 36 457 26 430 26 524 29 463 24 494 22 473 23 448 11 449 23 479 27 539 26 510 39 5 32 JO-1 73 58 86 135 491 254 538 274 467 310 472 458 424 545 427 497 369 660 310 688 327 767 263 751 269 729 239 573 241 519 261 485 283 452 272 370 233 355 202 374 174 395 192 408 160 439 148 424 138 454 116 439 117 467 97 30718 7:45 70'lm A -? ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/31/0 File: i\19drew.prn User: Direction: SOUTH THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------- 80 482 0 238 1507 59 502 55 488 0 177 1408 44 469 61 489 0 168 1328 42 442 54 574 0 167 1496 41 498 39 526 0 126 1565 31 521 30 563 0 92 1456 23 485 36 486 0 121 1429 30 476 41 592 0 90 1571 22 523 29 479 0 90 1488 22 496 17 479 0 70 1885 17 471 30 552 0 77 2206 19 551 26 454 0 74 1993 18 498 16 517 0 58 1981 14 495 22 523 0 63 2090 15 522 24 455 0 71 1899 17 474 14 538 0 89 2162 22 540 24 548 0 89 2176 22 544 29 570 0 116 2194 29 548 38 !Z21 0 117 2081 29 520 64 0 225 2132 56 533 57 70 0 195 2168 48 542 97 580 0 299 2315 74 578 144 6 1 0 480 2312 120 578 213 491 0 800 2030 200 507 267 535 0 793 2122 198 530 323 535 0 1077 2084 269 521 398 444 0 1438 1779 359 444 510 379 0 1674 1559 418 389 580 397 0 1731 1512 432 378 576 385 0 2009 1485 502 371 614 385 0 2050 1404 512 351 698 301 0 2260 1170 565 292 630 288 0 2200 1099 550 274 713 326 0 2187 1158 546 289 597 279 0 1803 1062 450 265 514 319 0 1632 1176 408 294 497 297 4 1510 1071 377 267 402 345 0 1364 1219 341 304 399 304 1201 1060 400 265 416 245 1185 908 395 227 401 214 1255 751 418 187 407 202 1279 781 426 195 397 160 1316 627 438 156 413 160 1326 601 442 150 426 141 1342 549 447 137 424 135 1323 503 441 125 401 98 1279 414 426 103 505 89 1524 363 508 90 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 32342 4 0 0 112179 30199 7:45 8:30 ?cmm 4 17:30 17:15 17:00 2304 2075 2302 3S1? 2.2-72 G,J 23 7 9 Zo65 /U S7?f( = 6/ -sy9el = .62- P ` ,. 6/ A--7 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/31/0 Site Reference: PARK PLACE File: i\19drew.prn Site ID: 172-07 User: Location: US 19, N. OF DREW ST Direction: ROAD TOTAL TIME MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 31 1 2 3 4 ,Lane 3 am pm am pm am -pm--- am- pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ 00:15 224 1034 196 1084 224 1093 0 644 3211 161 1070 00:30 203 1158 165 1008 187 1154 0 555 3320 138 1106 00:45 177 1068 174 870 196 1094 0 547 3032 136 1010 01:00 134 1104 138 1039 165 1166 0 437 3309 109 1103 01:15 143 1264 106 1012 138 1225 0 387 3501 96 1167 01:30 107 1128 100 997 125 1223 0 332 3348 83 1116 01:45 118 1090 108 1056 102 1099 0 328 3245 82 1081 02:00 90 1160 71 1009 102 1202 0 263 3371 65 1123 02:15 79 1139 84 1104 89 1153 0 252 3396 63 1132 02:30 1009 87 1137 89 1126 84 1149 0 260 4421 65 1105 02:45 1163 64 1199 76 1104 78 1188 0 218 4654 54 1163 03:00 1091 56 1193 80 1099 71 1073 0 207 4456 51 1114 03:15 1174 51 1201 67 1055 57 1174 0 175 4604 43 1151 03:30 1108 75 1214 60 1028 60 1108 0 195 4458 48 1114 03:45 1082 60 1236 53 1190 60 1082 0 173 4590 43 1147 04:00 1295 68 1376 60 1283 58 1295 0 186 5249 46 1312 04:15 1190 65 1386 50 1215 54 1190 0 169 4981 42 1245 04:30 1212 92 1327 72 35 64 1212 0 228 5106 57 1276 04:45 1305 74 1300 71 1334 83 130 0 228 5244 57 1311 05:00 1363 136 1427 103 1358 97 1363 0 336 5511 84 1377 05:15 1402 106 1382 113 1274 104 1402 0 323 5460 80 1365 05:30 1328 163 U147 146 1478 144 1328 0 453 5604 113 1401 05:45 1497 265 205 1324 205 1497 0 675 5825 168 1456 06:00 1299 440 358 1202 311 1299 0 1109 5183 277 1295 06:15 1245 385 1407 407 1112 391 1245 0 1183 5009 295 1252 06:30 1287 602 1359 455 1142 493 883 0 1550 4671 387 1167 06:45 1243 809 1347 657 1003 606 574 0 2072 4167 518 1041 07:00 1108 927 1081 850 1131 811 1355 0 2588 4675 647 1168 07:15 933 986 916 814 896 875 1332 0 2675 4077 668 1019 07:30 934 1102 1043 957 874 911 1164 0 2970 4015 742 1003 07:45 952 1174 867 1090 869 941 1234 0 3205 3922 801 980 08:00 752 1208 791 1143 749 1139 1037 0 3490 3329 872 832 08:15 745 1327 692 1209 726 1072 924 0 3608 3087 902 771 08:30 823 1197 722 1227 724 1170 1086 0 3594 3355 898 838 08:45 745 1140 736 1055 698 1046 955 0 3241 3134 810 783 09:00 755 1090 685 995 641 1118 968 0 3203 3049 800 762 09:15 664 1134 323 1048 724 1013 916 6 3201 2627 800 656 09:30 740 937 380 909 648 887 930 0 2733 2698 683 674 09:45 592 874 420 852 600 796 862 2522 2474 840 618 10:00 540 958 529 863 510 923 742 2744 2321 914 580 10:15 466 985 388 859 451 855 737 2699 2042 899 510 10:30 497 926 492 856 490 902 685 2684 2164 894 541 10:45 370 1050 361 880 423 901 596 2831 1750 943 437 11:00 339 996 374 947 405 901 573 2844 1691 948 422 11:15 314 984 387 901 376 895 439 2780 1516 926 379 11:30 326 984 346 921 357 906 326 2811 1355 937 338 11:45 272 1005 273 1028 330 989 272 3022 1147 1007 286 12:00 205 1099 223 997 279 1068 205 3164 912 1054 228 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TALS 35365 72981 68427 73581 6 J?0 0 250360 67371 Times 7:45 7:45 8:0:0 AM Peaks 4906 4669 44270 8 36 ? J PGY / 41,e 4-Q 71 ol ?'3 M Times 17:00 1786 16:45 17:00 -ol Z/ C 4 3 ? / O 9 7 M Peaks 5590 5 5786 5444 5590 4f? -- - 7®1 2O ,3 l? d. 0 7? 6, o?? 0. 0 7 6 T ad = 0,o7Fr D. r B 4 S? - z A-8 Florida Design Consultants Inc Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT TIME MON TUE WED 31 1 2 Lane 1 am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------- 00:15 133 588 156 627 00:30 111 601 127 622 00:45 122 588 128 506 01:00 85 638 105 559 01:15 91 663 92 570 01:30 76 632 76 561 01:45 65 563 87 639 02:00 61 642 57 557 02:15 58 681 69 631 02:30 64 576 67 637 02:45 384 48 689 66 610 03:00 547 33 662 55 648 03:15 639 41 619 45 673 03:30 682 45 698 60 573 03:45 611 42 671 31 625 04:00 670 31 754 38 768 04:15 750 27 866 30 734 04:30 693 42 814 36 723 04:45 742 32 732 41 750 05:00 774 45 831 34 844 05:15 889 29 876 56 45 05:30 775 57 827 76 807 05:45 789 67 833 77 853 06:00 847 95 847 97 871 06:15 825 137 869 125 818 06:30 719 151 836 165 799 06:45 746 222 823 213 733 07:00 792 299 798 283 771 07:15 590 320 603 330 627 07:30 590 341 631 340 544 07:45 489 407 546 409 569 08:00 484 448 560 432 526 08:15 491 530 461 492 485 08:30 483 488 460 521 468 08:45 458 541 420 533 435 09:00 441 502 442 467 405 09:15 334 589 305 586 441 09:30 376 498 333 481 414 09:45 315 459 357 474 383 10:00 339 453 354 537 307 10:15 286 520 267 517 319 10:30 266 523 280 530 331 10:45 242 493 260 507 304 11:00 213 496 245 497 257 11:15 186 528 267 531 269 11:30 197 544 263 544 243 11:45 184 505 192 527 232 12:00 116 529 155 566 175 ----------------------------------------- TOTALS 19954 39641 39401 AM Times 8:45 11:15 AM Peaks 2130 2168 PM Times 17:15 17:45 17:15 PM Peaks 3300 3385 3376 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/31/00 File: 19sunset.prn User: Direction: NORTH THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 3 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------------- 173 672 202 664 1887 166 629 163 622 142 543 1845 135 615 148 635 147 545 1729 136 576 123 657 114 427 1854 106 618 112 672 104 399 1905 99 635 90 621 106 348 1814 87 604 72 590 88 312 1792 78 597 72 677 77 267 1876 66 625 79 663 74 280 1975 70 658 74 567 105 310 1780 77 593 59 621 74 247 2304 61 576 43 685 68 199 2542 49 635 46 649 53 185 2580 46 645 38 674 42 185 2627 46 656 48 676 56 177 2583 44 645 60 744 50 179 2936 44 734 39 769 45 141 3119 35 779 35 788 47 160 3018 40 754 53 784 48 174 3008 43 752 44 827 58 181 3276 45 819 45 900 52 182 3510 45 877 55 818 62 250 3227 62 806 69 834 83 296 3309 74 827 96 8 95 383 3425 95 856 140 871 132 534 3383 133 845 167 852 157 640 3206 160 801 194 815 191 820 3117 205 779 282 741 327 1191 3102 297 775 336 711 328 1314 2531 328 632 380 599 351 1412 2364 353 591 386 589 409 1611 2193 402 548 450 521 440 1770 2091 442 522 516 507 514 2052 1944 513 486 473 551 474 1956 1962 489 490 505 460 535 2114 1773 528 443 553 492 515 2037 1780 509 445 590 457 9 1774 1537 443 384 513 397 0 1492 1520 373 380 439 438 1372 1493 457 373 541 368 1531 1368 510 342 461 360 1498 1232 499 308 543 328 1596 1205 532 301 529 329 1529 1135 509 283 476 270 1469 985 489 246 520 305 1579 1027 526 256 528 252 1616 955 538 238 533 211 1565 819 521 204 597 178 1692 624 564 156 --------------------------------------------------------------- 41095 6374 0 0 146465 39408 11:15 8:15 2178 2038 17:45 3417 A-9 Florida Design Consultants Inc ' WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 1 Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT TIME MON TUE WED THU 31 1 2 3 Lane 2 am pm am pm am pm am pm --------------------------------------------------- 00:15 66 433 00:30 50 462 00:45 55 371 01:00 47 394 01:15 32 485 01:30 40 428 01:45 36 394 02:00 33 441 02:15 32 410 02:30 25 405 02:45 339 24 455 03:00 435 18 441 03:15 396 17 431 03:30 398 29 496 03:45 382 26 402 04:00 431 35 457 04:15 455 40 443 04:30 488 36 446 04:45 381 40 438 05:00 405 88 429 05:15 433 75 430 05:30 476 109 529 05:45 452 159 491 06:00 380 271 421 06:15 424 231 467 06:30 416 395 454 06:45 330 477 382 07:00 288 562 325 07:15 331 572 310 07:30 315 665 356 07:45 299 679 277 08:00 244 647 298 08:15 236 638 225 08:30 259 643 244 08:45 234 563 243 09:00 260 526 247 09:15 235 501 197 09:30 289 446 257 09:45 254 417 213 10:00 199 385 225 10:15 177 415 168 10:30 150 414 179 10:45 131 421 133 11:00 142 390 140 11:15 106 409 108 11:30 102 357 128 11:45 84 366 104 12:00 70 427 92 ------------------------------ TOTALS 11426 29233 AM Times 7:30 AM Peaks 2629 PM Times 17:00 17:30 PM Peaks 1766 1908 62 414 49 363 58 341 49 393 45 411 30 410 42 424 37 409 30 425 26 418 18 410 24 418 17 436 15 410 30 412 30 466 28 464 33 451 44 424 82 480 73 459 103 477 159 424 253 486 281 434 342 438 451 385 548 389 540 372 672 325 660 337 711 286 670 258 673 284 626 242 571 258 512 299 457 290 421 271 347 208 395 215 365 192 388 166 385 168 395 132 415 142 382 116 418 106 29500 7:45 2714 17:15 1846 84 443 63 423 69 415 53 529 58 459 37 468 46 438 40 505 38 438 24 408 40 500 24 471 25 426 31 452 35 429 24 465 25 508 30 465 57 496 78 76 509 111 559 167 495 253 936 283 482 356 472 437 370 582 367 612 329 649 391 683 329 732 276 743 301 648 304 582 346 552 277 566 308 450 313 433. 250 412 260 400 220 423 199 382 173 393 150 419 166 407 166 378 132 456 86 31308 7:30 2807 16:45 2002 FRI Page: 2 File: 19sunset.prn User: Direction: SOUTH SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ----------------------------------------------------- 94 306 1290 76 430 79 241 1248 60 416 68 250 1127 62 375 94 193 1316 48 438 42 177 1355 44 451 49 156 1306 39 435 53 177 1256 44 418 44 154 1355 38 451 42 142 1273 35 424 44 119 1231 29 410 38 120 1704 30 426 28 94 1765 23 441 25 84 1689 21 422 24 99 1756 24 439 95 136 1625 34 406 33 122 1819 30 454 37 130 1870 32 467 30 129 1850 32 462 43 184 1739 46 434 82 330 1752 82 438 71 295 1831 73 457 101 424 2041 106 510 156 641 1862 160 465 245 1022 1723 255 430 263 1058 1807 264 451 305 1398 1780 349 445 461 1826 1467 456 366 552 2244 1369 561 342 504 2228 1342 557 335 624 2610 1387 652 346 706 2728 1242 682 310 705 2795 1104 698 276 667 2718 1020 679 255 634 2598 1091 649 272 626 2397 1065 599 266 536 2185 1042 546 260 1 1580 1039 395 259 0 1353 1149 338 287 1271 988 423 247 1144 892 381 223 1210 780 403 195 1202 720 400 180 1191 603 397 150 1168 600 389 150 1223 512 407 128 1179 538 393 134 1126 436 375 109 1301 354 433 88 ------------------------------------------------ 8101 0 0 109568 29422 7:45 2712 ,,v 13 s a %atz-1 T 3376 /9og 52??- 6t W 3 376 re5 4 6 ?? = 6' 3 -912 /y, 9 p- ?• 0 54 /1 _ .43 A -(D 1 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 ' Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT TIME MON TUE 31 1 Lane 3 am pm am pm am ----------------------------------- 00:15 199 1021 00:30 161 1063 00:45 177 959 01:00 132 1032 01:15 123 1148 01:30 116 1060 01:45 101 957 02:00 94 1083 02:15 90 1091 02:30 89 981 02:45 723 72 1144 03:00 982 51 1103 03:15 1035 58 1050 03:30 1080 74 1194 03:45 993 68 1073 04:00 1101 66 1211 04:15 1205 67 1309 04:30 1181 78 1260 04:45 1123 72 1170 05:00 1179 133 1260 05:15 1322 104 130 05:30 1251 166 356 05:45 1241 226 1324 06:00 1227 366 1268 06:15 1249 368 1 6 06:30 1135 546 1290 06:45 1076 699 1205 07:00 1080 861 1123 07:15 921 892 913 07:30 905 1006 987 07:45 788 1086 823 08:00 728 1095 858 08:15 727 1168 686 08:30 742 1131 704 08:45 692 1104 663 09:00 701 1028 689 09:15 569 1090 502 09:30 665 944 590 09:45 569 876 570 10:00 538 838 579 10:15 463 935 435 10:30 416 937 459 10:45 373 914 393 11:00 355 886 385 11:15 292 937 375 11:30 299 901 391 11:45 268 871 296 12:00 186 956 247 ------------------------------ TOTALS 31380 68874 AM Times 8:00 AM Peaks 4498 PM Times 17:15 17:30 PM Peaks 5041 5284 %, = 0.0 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 Page: 3 File: 19sunset.prn User: Direction: ROAD TOTAL WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 2 3 pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 218 1041 257 1115 176 985 226 1045 186 847 217 1050 154 952 176 1186 137 981 170 1131 106 971 127 1089 129 1063 118 1028 94 966 112 1182 99 1056 117 1101 93 1055 98 975 84 1020 99 1121 79 1066 67 1156 62 1109 71 1075 75 983 69 1126 61 1037 83 1105 68 1234 84 1209 58 1198 64 1277 69 1174 65 1253 85 1174 110 1280 116 1324 122 1265 129 304 121 409 179 1284 166 1377 236 1277 236 1329 350 1357 349 29 406 1252 423 1353 507 1237 523 1324 664 1118 631 1185 831 1160 864 1108 870 999 948 1040 1012 869 1029 990 1069 906 1069 918 1143 812 1182 797 1162 743 1259 808 1194 752 1121 855 1159 677 1087 806 1038 663 1105 769 1098 740 1156 765 938 704 963 710 895 654 872 688 884 515 953 628 912 534 861 580 895 523 966 527 895 470 911 502 882 425 869 420 926 401 939 471 959 385 935 418 909 348 911 343 984 281 1053 264 ----------------------- 68901 72403 8:00 8:00 4658 4649 17:15 17:15 5222 5411 77 O.p76 0.0 -1 296 970 3177 242 1059 221 784 3093 196 1031 215 795 2856 198 952 158 620 3170 155 1056 146 576 3260 144 1086 155 504 3120 126 1040 141 489 3048 122 1016 121 421 3231 105 1077 116 422 3248 105 1082 149 429 3011 107 1003 112 367 4008 91 1002 96 293 4307 73 1076 78 269 4269 67 1067 66 284 4383 71 1095 101 313 4208 78 1052 83 301 4755 75 1188 82 271 4989 67 1247 77 289 4868 72 1217 91 358 4747 89 1186 140 511 5028 127 1257 123 477 5341 119 1335 163 674 5268 168 1317 239 937 5171 234 1292 340 1405 5148 351 1287 395 1592 5190 398 1297 462 2038 4986 509 1246 652 2646 4584 661 1146 879 3435 4471 658 1117 832 3542 3873 885 968 975 4022 3751 1005 937 1115 4339 3435 1084 858 1145 4565 3195 1141 798 1181 4770 2964 1192 741 1108 4554 3053 1138 763 1161 4511 2838 1127 709 1051 4222 2822 1055 705 10 3354 2576 838 644 0 2845 2669 711 667 2643 2481 881 620 2675 2260 891 565 2708 2012 902 503 2798 1925 932 481 2720 1738 906 434 2637 1585 879 396 2802 1539 934 384 2795 1493 931 373 2691 1255 897 313 2993 978 997 244 ------------------------------------------------- 14475 0 0 256033 68863 8:00 3 P:z Ro- A-P j 7o, DS q 4595 67,3t6 ?oo o. v 82 o. 93 '//op ova A -(D 1 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 ' Location: US 19, S. OF SUNSET PT TIME MON TUE 31 1 Lane 3 am pm am pm am ----------------------------------- 00:15 199 1021 00:30 161 1063 00:45 177 959 01:00 132 1032 01:15 123 1148 01:30 116 1060 01:45 101 957 02:00 94 1083 02:15 90 1091 02:30 89 981 02:45 723 72 1144 03:00 982 51 1103 03:15 1035 58 1050 03:30 1080 74 1194 03:45 993 68 1073 04:00 1101 66 1211 04:15 1205 67 1309 04:30 1181 78 1260 04:45 1123 72 1170 05:00 1179 133 1260 05:15 1322 104 130 05:30 1251 166 356 05:45 1241 226 1324 06:00 1227 366 1268 06:15 1249 368 1 6 06:30 1135 546 1290 06:45 1076 699 1205 07:00 1080 861 1123 07:15 921 892 913 07:30 905 1006 987 07:45 788 1086 823 08:00 728 1095 858 08:15 727 1168 686 08:30 742 1131 704 08:45 692 1104 663 09:00 701 1028 689 09:15 569 1090 502 09:30 665 944 590 09:45 569 876 570 10:00 538 838 579 10:15 463 935 435 10:30 416 937 459 10:45 373 914 393 11:00 355 886 385 11:15 292 937 375 11:30 299 901 391 11:45 268 871 296 12:00 186 956 247 ------------------------------ TOTALS 31380 68874 AM Times 8:00 AM Peaks 4498 PM Times 17:15 17:30 PM Peaks 5041 5284 %, = 0.0 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 Page: 3 File: 19sunset.prn User: Direction: ROAD TOTAL WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 2 3 pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 218 1041 257 1115 176 985 226 1045 186 847 217 1050 154 952 176 1186 137 981 170 1131 106 971 127 1089 129 1063 118 1028 94 966 112 1182 99 1056 117 1101 93 1055 98 975 84 1020 99 1121 79 1066 67 1156 62 1109 71 1075 75 983 69 1126 61 1037 83 1105 68 1234 84 1209 58 1198 64 1277 69 1174 65 1253 85 1174 110 1280 116 1324 122 1265 129 304 121 409 179 1284 166 1377 236 1277 236 1329 350 1357 349 29 406 1252 423 1353 507 1237 523 1324 664 1118 631 1185 831 1160 864 1108 870 999 948 1040 1012 869 1029 990 1069 906 1069 918 1143 812 1182 797 1162 743 1259 808 1194 752 1121 855 1159 677 1087 806 1038 663 1105 769 1098 740 1156 765 938 704 963 710 895 654 872 688 884 515 953 628 912 534 861 580 895 523 966 527 895 470 911 502 882 425 869 420 926 401 939 471 959 385 935 418 909 348 911 343 984 281 1053 264 ----------------------- 68901 72403 8:00 8:00 4658 4649 17:15 17:15 5222 5411 77 O.p76 0.0 -1 296 970 3177 242 1059 221 784 3093 196 1031 215 795 2856 198 952 158 620 3170 155 1056 146 576 3260 144 1086 155 504 3120 126 1040 141 489 3048 122 1016 121 421 3231 105 1077 116 422 3248 105 1082 149 429 3011 107 1003 112 367 4008 91 1002 96 293 4307 73 1076 78 269 4269 67 1067 66 284 4383 71 1095 101 313 4208 78 1052 83 301 4755 75 1188 82 271 4989 67 1247 77 289 4868 72 1217 91 358 4747 89 1186 140 511 5028 127 1257 123 477 5341 119 1335 163 674 5268 168 1317 239 937 5171 234 1292 340 1405 5148 351 1287 395 1592 5190 398 1297 462 2038 4986 509 1246 652 2646 4584 661 1146 879 3435 4471 658 1117 832 3542 3873 885 968 975 4022 3751 1005 937 1115 4339 3435 1084 858 1145 4565 3195 1141 798 1181 4770 2964 1192 741 1108 4554 3053 1138 763 1161 4511 2838 1127 709 1051 4222 2822 1055 705 10 3354 2576 838 644 0 2845 2669 711 667 2643 2481 881 620 2675 2260 891 565 2708 2012 902 503 2798 1925 932 481 2720 1738 906 434 2637 1585 879 396 2802 1539 934 384 2795 1493 931 373 2691 1255 897 313 2993 978 997 244 ------------------------------------------------- 14475 0 0 256033 68863 8:00 3 P:z Ro- A-P j 7o, DS q 4595 67,3t6 ?oo o. v 82 o. 93 '//op ova A-i2 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: DREW ST, E. OF HAMPT TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 2 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 12 107 00:30 25 106 00:45 22 102 01:00 23 102 01:15 17 117 01:30 9 116 01:45 13 98 02:00 12 103 02:15 40 15 95 02:30 92 9 110 02:45 85 14 102 03:00 97 8 93 03:15 96 3 121 03:30 108 7 106 03:45 128 4 120 04:00 109 3 143 04:15 141 2 141 04:30 113 5 149 04:45 104 6 133 05:00 118 3 111 05:15 123 10 12 05:30 132 10 123 05:45 114 9 145 06:00 122 32 126 06:15 142 39 149 06:30 119 28 25 06:45 92 35 121 07:00 111 55 117 07:15 95 95 98 07:30 81 92 97 07:45 68 89 87 08:00 90 85 107 08:15 74 97 102 08:30 80 103 84 08:45 74 116 75 09:00 72 95 81 09:15 68 135 90 09:30 62 101 81 09:45 51 101 62 10:00 48 90 62 10:15 47 113 56 10:30 51 88 67 10:45 42 95 58 11:00 33 81 48 11:15 45 106 41 11:30 43 106 38 11:45 38 110 38 12:00 20 92 35 ------------------------------- TOTALS 3368 7131 AM Times 8:30 AM Peaks 449 Florida Design Consultants Inc ON WED 26 am pm 23 105 29 106 31 98 17 119 16 111 16 105 6 108 10 86 16 109 7 95 15 104 8 113 7 100 4 120 3 128 4 109 8 141 5 113 10 104 5 118 9 123 10 132 16 114 27 122 40 142 34 119 31 120 66 112 96 117 79 101 85 105 98 102 118 107 110 87 117 87 120 91 130 134 102 90 98 75 86 66 110 53 108 61 107 52 84 47 108 29 72 58 89 46 90 35 7199 8:30 477 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/24/00 File: \drewham.prn User: Direction: WEST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------------- 28 92 43 108 106 412 26 103 29 130 35 120 118 462 29 115 21 102 28 101 102 403 25 100 20 123 16 125 76 469 19 117 17 134 20 147 70 509 17 127 13 113 22 107 60 441 15 110 20 104 21 127 60 437 15 109 18 103 11 116 51 408 12 102 10 109 8 112 49 465 12 93 18 104 13 116 47 517 11 103 10 109 9 120 48 520 12 104 9 106 9 75 34 484 8 96 10 115 3 0 23 432 5 86 7 114 9 0 27 448 6 89 8 133 7 22 509 5 127 5 134 11 23 495 5 123 2 130 8 20 553 5 138 5 139 2 17 514 4 128 10 141 12 38 482 9 120 6 130 9 23 477 5 119 11 3 3 33 499 8 124 9 146 5 34 533 8 133 11 159 18 54 532 13 133 31 129 23 113 499 28 124 35 134 23 137 567 34 141 23 123 23 108 486 27 121 39 123 38 143 456 35 114 67 107 61 249 447 62 111 99 124 66 356 434 89 108 65 108 76 312 387 78 96 88 118 74 336 378 84 94 81 135 86 350 434 87 108 120 129 139 474 412 118 103 111 93 93 417 344 104 86 121 66 131 485 302 121 75 128 91 117 460 335 115 83 101 89 107 473 381 118 95 110 114 113 426 347 106 86 98 63 80 377 251 94 62 98 62 104 378 238 94 59 100 63 103 426 219 106 54 92 84 109 397 263 99 65 93 85 114 409 237 102 59 93 37 101 359 165 89 41 114 55 108 436 170 109 42 97 62 96 371 201 92 50 113 43 93 405 165 101 41 105 28 108 395 118 98 29 --------------------------------------------------------------- 7584 3882 0 0 29164 7110 8:15 8:15 480 480 PM Times 17:30 16:00 17:30 17:30 13:00 le'a W PM Peaks 510 566 510 568 506 7- 76 Z S? 3 i3os 714 SG T /Z 97 4 p _ ..se A-i2 Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: DREW ST, E. OF HAMPT TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 2 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 12 107 00:30 25 106 00:45 22 102 01:00 23 102 01:15 17 117 01:30 9 116 01:45 13 98 02:00 12 103 02:15 40 15 95 02:30 92 9 110 02:45 85 14 102 03:00 97 8 93 03:15 96 3 121 03:30 108 7 106 03:45 128 4 120 04:00 109 3 143 04:15 141 2 141 04:30 113 5 149 04:45 104 6 133 05:00 118 3 111 05:15 123 10 12 05:30 132 10 123 05:45 114 9 145 06:00 122 32 126 06:15 142 39 149 06:30 119 28 25 06:45 92 35 121 07:00 111 55 117 07:15 95 95 98 07:30 81 92 97 07:45 68 89 87 08:00 90 85 107 08:15 74 97 102 08:30 80 103 84 08:45 74 116 75 09:00 72 95 81 09:15 68 135 90 09:30 62 101 81 09:45 51 101 62 10:00 48 90 62 10:15 47 113 56 10:30 51 88 67 10:45 42 95 58 11:00 33 81 48 11:15 45 106 41 11:30 43 106 38 11:45 38 110 38 12:00 20 92 35 ------------------------------- TOTALS 3368 7131 AM Times 8:30 AM Peaks 449 Florida Design Consultants Inc ON WED 26 am pm 23 105 29 106 31 98 17 119 16 111 16 105 6 108 10 86 16 109 7 95 15 104 8 113 7 100 4 120 3 128 4 109 8 141 5 113 10 104 5 118 9 123 10 132 16 114 27 122 40 142 34 119 31 120 66 112 96 117 79 101 85 105 98 102 118 107 110 87 117 87 120 91 130 134 102 90 98 75 86 66 110 53 108 61 107 52 84 47 108 29 72 58 89 46 90 35 7199 8:30 477 WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/24/00 File: \drewham.prn User: Direction: WEST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------------- 28 92 43 108 106 412 26 103 29 130 35 120 118 462 29 115 21 102 28 101 102 403 25 100 20 123 16 125 76 469 19 117 17 134 20 147 70 509 17 127 13 113 22 107 60 441 15 110 20 104 21 127 60 437 15 109 18 103 11 116 51 408 12 102 10 109 8 112 49 465 12 93 18 104 13 116 47 517 11 103 10 109 9 120 48 520 12 104 9 106 9 75 34 484 8 96 10 115 3 0 23 432 5 86 7 114 9 0 27 448 6 89 8 133 7 22 509 5 127 5 134 11 23 495 5 123 2 130 8 20 553 5 138 5 139 2 17 514 4 128 10 141 12 38 482 9 120 6 130 9 23 477 5 119 11 3 3 33 499 8 124 9 146 5 34 533 8 133 11 159 18 54 532 13 133 31 129 23 113 499 28 124 35 134 23 137 567 34 141 23 123 23 108 486 27 121 39 123 38 143 456 35 114 67 107 61 249 447 62 111 99 124 66 356 434 89 108 65 108 76 312 387 78 96 88 118 74 336 378 84 94 81 135 86 350 434 87 108 120 129 139 474 412 118 103 111 93 93 417 344 104 86 121 66 131 485 302 121 75 128 91 117 460 335 115 83 101 89 107 473 381 118 95 110 114 113 426 347 106 86 98 63 80 377 251 94 62 98 62 104 378 238 94 59 100 63 103 426 219 106 54 92 84 109 397 263 99 65 93 85 114 409 237 102 59 93 37 101 359 165 89 41 114 55 108 436 170 109 42 97 62 96 371 201 92 50 113 43 93 405 165 101 41 105 28 108 395 118 98 29 --------------------------------------------------------------- 7584 3882 0 0 29164 7110 8:15 8:15 480 480 PM Times 17:30 16:00 17:30 17:30 13:00 le'a W PM Peaks 510 566 510 568 506 7- 76 Z S? 3 i3os 714 SG T /Z 97 4 p _ ..se I Site Reference: PARK PLACE ID: 172-07 ,Site Location: DREW ST, E. OF HAMPT TIME MON TUE 24 25 (Lane 3 am pm am pm f------------------------------ 00:15 39 218 00:30 50 250 00:45 33 221 01:00 34 223 01:15 36 244 01:30 22 235 01:45 32 205 Il 02:00 24 213 02:15 76 30 211 02:30 187 19 211 02:45 191 18 225 03:00 192 18 238 03:15 218 11 257 03:30 225 11 231 03:45 259 11 226 04:00 266 12 316 04:15 277 5 296 04:30 238 9 290 04:45 256 14 297 05:00 268 8 272 05:15 255 18 2 05:30 293 23 314 05:45 284 27 321 06:00 309 50 331 06:15 318 79 339 06:30 289 62 292 06:45 245 103 281 07:00 243 155 250 07:15 206 195 220 07:30 197 190 223 07:45 172 219 211 08:00 192 194 222 08:15 144 214 194 08:30 160 217 176 08:45 138 244 161 09:00 159 206 161 09:15 142 234 189 09:30 147 196 170 09:45 143 203 124 10:00 112 193 132 10:15 94 201 116 10:30 115 160 121 10:45 83 184 117 11:00 75 187 77 11:15 103 215 88 11:30 101 195 86 11:45 71 225 89 12:00 50 203 62 ------------------------------- TOTALS 7493 15256 ' Times 8:30 AM Peaks 901 M Times 17:30 17:30 r M Peaks 1204 1305 ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/24/00 File: \drewham.prn User: Direction: ROAD TOTAL THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------------------ 56 189 82 233 235 843 58 210 56 267 64 283 229 1036 57 259 41 221 56 203 187 855 46 213 42 239 43 228 149 910 37 227 36 251 47 171 159 903 39 225 26 252 40 118 115 833 28 208 34 226 36 141 124 801 31 200 31 221 23 120 101 749 25 187 26 217 24 126 108 861 27 172 29 224 30 128 97 944 24 188 17 237 21 144 85 1008 21 201 19 236 13 80 72 981 18 196 22 258 14 0 60 964 15 192 15 240 21 0 57 922 14 184 15 270 17 52 1008 13 252 7 298 13 43 1183 10 295 9 283 18 45 1152 11 288 17 290 12 49 1086 12 271 12 281 18 58 1101 14 275 18 302 17 58 1142 14 285 17 299 13 63 1104 15 276 22 315 14 84 1223 21 305 24 348 32 121 1266 30 316 55 318 53 208 1280 52 320 77 303 51 282 1294 70 323 61 310 68 270 1196 67 299 109 284 108 418 1101 104 275 159 241 129 595 974 148 243 193 252 178 743 924 185 231 182 244 179 732 913 183 228 209 255 200 852 888 213 222 219 261 205 852 909 213 227 238 253 263 982 796 245 199 256 199 232 960 724 240 181 245 157 254 979 636 244 159 224 201 266 926 724 231 181 210 181 261 941 738 235 184 206 231 241 842 744 210 186 207 164 217 826 578 206 144 182 135 207 753 536 188 134 191 129 218 800 456 200 114 182 162 195 726 520 181 130 178 146 223 799 459 199 114 180 92 214 756 336 189 84 216 112 221 867 376 216 94 198 122 208 767 428 191 107 203 90 195 820 337 205 84 228 83 233 860 274 215 68 ------------------------------------------------------------ 16088 7462 0 0 61923 15166 / / 8 8 963 1022 3 P& y 4ve A-b f - /S, bl h 11284 12947 /S 1617 Floi ON WED 26 --am---pm - 58 203 59 236 57 210 30 220 40 237 27 228 22 229 23 195 28 231 19 194 29 211 22 235 13 231 10 226 9 253 11 303 13 296 11 268 14 267 15 300 15 268 25 301 38 313 50 322 75 334 79 305 98 291 152 240 177 246 181 249 224 250 234 234 267 205 255 189 236 180 230 203 236 226 199 196 199 147 171 157 190 117 189 122 214 113 175 92 215 73 166 119 197 87 196 79 15624 8:00 992 17:45 1274 b.o8b 08 2- ?.oeo _ 0.0 83 /1,1100 _ 0. ?3 &4,71&0 = /, ¢z / E$ 82-4 w /3 r? 7 r Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 ' Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF HERCULES TIME MON TUE WED THU 31 1 2 3 Lane 2 am pm am pm am pm am pm --------------------------------------------------- 00: 15 91 426 00:30 77 409 00:45 74 479 01:00 82 441 01:15 73 463 01:30 67 470 01:45 58 437 02:00 52 399 02:15 360 38 433 02:30 380 26 399 02:45 365 33 406 03:00 393 34 446 03:15 381 25 425 03:30 394 18 463 03:45 370 21 424 04:00 401 21 387 04:15 402 23 412 04:30 423 28 422 04:45 322 19 422 05:00 435 33 467 05:15 426 37 408 05:30 459 27 441 05:45 419 43 442 06:00 460 66 487 06:15 414 94 411 06:30 416 117 482 06:45 426 138 421 07:00 397 196 467 07:15 425 237 413 07:30 365 238 316 07:45 321 265 300 08:00 317 355 353 08:15 361 373 336 08:30 313 324 321 08:45 281 384 298 09:00 307 408 270 09:15 334 410 238 09:30 279 324 230 09:45 273 362 267 10:00 252 352 231 10:15 238 370 233 10:30 231 330 220 10:45 194 392 181 11:00 155 370 168 11:15 132 392 164 11:30 144 400 185 11:45 111 387 147 12:00 110 414 127 ------------------------------ TOTALS 13186 25885 AM Times 11:15 AM Peaks 1593 PM Times 17:15 12:45 PM Peaks 1764 1853 108 381 96 381 103 364 71 338 75 331 67 340 61 454 53 444 58 408 42 360 37 397 40 382 29 394 23 413 22 445 26 432 15 448 24 402 25 425 30 430 31 451 35 430 60 67 447 82 490 112 945 143 467 226 397 257 397 236 356 260 324 356 331 365 331 370 285 361 298 355 293 400 289 325 325 360 117 363 252 381 238 368 231 395 194 360 155 415 132 371 144 411 111 403 110 25344 11:15 1600 18:00 1849 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 100 404 87 395 89 422 77 390 74 397 68 405 60 446 52 422 48 421 34 380 35 365 37 393 27 381 21 394 21 370 24 401 19 402 26 423 22 322 32 435 34 426 31 459 52 419 66 96 88 414 115 416 141 426 211 445 247 367 237 346 263 327 355 343 369 350 347 315 373 311 382 310 405 336 324 316 361 307 358 255 376 279 349 258 394 224 365 249 404 192 386 171 399 143 409 137 25763 11:15 1598 17:15 1764 Page: 2 File: tbhercul.prn User: Direction: WEST FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------ 147 446 1211 111 403 123 383 1185 95 395 118 384 1265 96 421 96 326 1169 81 389 89 311 1191 77 397 71 273 1215 68 405 74 253 1337 63 445 57 214 1265 53 421 60 204 1622 51 405 58 160 1519 40 379 58 163 1533 40 383 33 144 1614 36 403 49 130 1581 32 395 31 93 1664 23 416 37 101 1609 25 402 29 100 1621 25 405 35 92 1664 23 416 42 120 1670 30 417 39 105 1491 26 372 24 119 1767 29 441 39 141 1711 35 427 47 140 1789 35 447 61 216 1742 54 435 87 286 1854 71 463 91 355 1729 88 432 111 455 1759 113 439 159 581 1740 145 435 204 837 1706 209 426 239 980 1602 245 400 224 935 1383 233 345 295 1083 1272 270 318 357 1423 1344 355 336 364 1471 1378 367 344 375 1416 1234 354 308 352 1470 1188 367 297 376 1521 1180 380 295 355 1570 1197 392 299 183 1156 1150 289 287 0 1083 964 270 241 1073 990 357 247 1127 988 375 247 1047 940 349 235 1181 793 393 198 1095 727 365 181 1211 620 403 155 1157 644 385 161 1197 512 399 128 1226 484 408 121 -------------------------------------------------- 5189 0 0 95367 25487 8:15 1467 X882 /?? ? 3660 /819 36 cep = . So ?'?'- X76 g _?76 / , 53 ?= S J OsG Z) = ®. s2. r Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 ' Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF HERCULES TIME MON TUE WED THU 31 1 2 3 Lane 2 am pm am pm am pm am pm --------------------------------------------------- 00: 15 91 426 00:30 77 409 00:45 74 479 01:00 82 441 01:15 73 463 01:30 67 470 01:45 58 437 02:00 52 399 02:15 360 38 433 02:30 380 26 399 02:45 365 33 406 03:00 393 34 446 03:15 381 25 425 03:30 394 18 463 03:45 370 21 424 04:00 401 21 387 04:15 402 23 412 04:30 423 28 422 04:45 322 19 422 05:00 435 33 467 05:15 426 37 408 05:30 459 27 441 05:45 419 43 442 06:00 460 66 487 06:15 414 94 411 06:30 416 117 482 06:45 426 138 421 07:00 397 196 467 07:15 425 237 413 07:30 365 238 316 07:45 321 265 300 08:00 317 355 353 08:15 361 373 336 08:30 313 324 321 08:45 281 384 298 09:00 307 408 270 09:15 334 410 238 09:30 279 324 230 09:45 273 362 267 10:00 252 352 231 10:15 238 370 233 10:30 231 330 220 10:45 194 392 181 11:00 155 370 168 11:15 132 392 164 11:30 144 400 185 11:45 111 387 147 12:00 110 414 127 ------------------------------ TOTALS 13186 25885 AM Times 11:15 AM Peaks 1593 PM Times 17:15 12:45 PM Peaks 1764 1853 108 381 96 381 103 364 71 338 75 331 67 340 61 454 53 444 58 408 42 360 37 397 40 382 29 394 23 413 22 445 26 432 15 448 24 402 25 425 30 430 31 451 35 430 60 67 447 82 490 112 945 143 467 226 397 257 397 236 356 260 324 356 331 365 331 370 285 361 298 355 293 400 289 325 325 360 117 363 252 381 238 368 231 395 194 360 155 415 132 371 144 411 111 403 110 25344 11:15 1600 18:00 1849 Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Starting: 7/31/00 100 404 87 395 89 422 77 390 74 397 68 405 60 446 52 422 48 421 34 380 35 365 37 393 27 381 21 394 21 370 24 401 19 402 26 423 22 322 32 435 34 426 31 459 52 419 66 96 88 414 115 416 141 426 211 445 247 367 237 346 263 327 355 343 369 350 347 315 373 311 382 310 405 336 324 316 361 307 358 255 376 279 349 258 394 224 365 249 404 192 386 171 399 143 409 137 25763 11:15 1598 17:15 1764 Page: 2 File: tbhercul.prn User: Direction: WEST FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 4 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ------------------------------------------------------ 147 446 1211 111 403 123 383 1185 95 395 118 384 1265 96 421 96 326 1169 81 389 89 311 1191 77 397 71 273 1215 68 405 74 253 1337 63 445 57 214 1265 53 421 60 204 1622 51 405 58 160 1519 40 379 58 163 1533 40 383 33 144 1614 36 403 49 130 1581 32 395 31 93 1664 23 416 37 101 1609 25 402 29 100 1621 25 405 35 92 1664 23 416 42 120 1670 30 417 39 105 1491 26 372 24 119 1767 29 441 39 141 1711 35 427 47 140 1789 35 447 61 216 1742 54 435 87 286 1854 71 463 91 355 1729 88 432 111 455 1759 113 439 159 581 1740 145 435 204 837 1706 209 426 239 980 1602 245 400 224 935 1383 233 345 295 1083 1272 270 318 357 1423 1344 355 336 364 1471 1378 367 344 375 1416 1234 354 308 352 1470 1188 367 297 376 1521 1180 380 295 355 1570 1197 392 299 183 1156 1150 289 287 0 1083 964 270 241 1073 990 357 247 1127 988 375 247 1047 940 349 235 1181 793 393 198 1095 727 365 181 1211 620 403 155 1157 644 385 161 1197 512 399 128 1226 484 408 121 -------------------------------------------------- 5189 0 0 95367 25487 8:15 1467 X882 /?? ? 3660 /819 36 cep = . So ?'?'- X76 g _?76 / , 53 ?= S J OsG Z) = ®. s2. Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF i TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 1 am pm am pm ------------------------------ 00:15 67 376 00:30 58 393 00:45 41 358 01:00 41 369 01:15 36 393 01:30 36 373 01:45 21 352 02:00 21 365 02:15 21 363 02:30 25 343 02:45 242 25 341 03:00 371 25 384 03:15 415 8 356 03:30 363 21 350 03:45 369 17 322 04:00 371 15 382 04:15 380 21 376 04:30 335 34 408 04:45 371 21 352 05:00 339 45 352 05:15 404 43 356 05:30 371 54 445 05:45 397 58 393 06:00 380 123 402 06:15 367 162 395 06:30 348 175 335 06:45 330 214 319 07:00 268 298 309 07:15 220 363 285 07:30 224 356 201 07:45 220 408 257 08:00 203 441 209 08:15 196 473 196 08:30 205 447 203 08:45 144 458 170 09:00 179 371 183 09:15 131 358 155 09:30 168 300 185 09:45 134 319 188 10:00 127 257 142 10:15 140 298 131 10:30 108 242 114 10:45 123 300 131 11:00 112 289 95 11:15 86 270 118 11:30 75 246 127 11:45 67 309 97 12:00 82 343 60 ------------------------------- TOTALS 9365 22083 AM Times 8:00 AM Peaks 1819 PM Times 17:15 17:30 PM Peaks 1552 1635 F1oi rS 19 WED 26 am pm 71 384 45 399 36 384 49 389 49 378 23 361 25 395 30 298 34 380 45 306 30 341 12 410 19 460 15 492 15 527 21 436 25 527 17 505 23 469 36 518 45 n607 58 73 127 157 151 512 192 408 309 252 330 246 322 207 404 211 415 211 432 188 425 185 378 181 358 159 371 144 283 170 341 179 332 164 319 147 287 116 356 136 348 101 326 86 291 90 319 71 406 69 ------------ 24103 7:45 1676 17:15 2222 ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 1 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User: Direction: EAST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm ---------------------------------------------------------- 64 291 75 315 277 1366 69 341 58 263 73 302 234 1357 58 339 58 239 49 296 184 1277 46 319 36 289 54 294 180 1341 45 335 36 274 49 242 170 1287 42 321 38 242 36 129 133 1105 33 276 28 376 25 0 99 1123 24 280 23 332 28 0 102 995 25 248 36 371 21 0 112 1114 28 278 32 326 30 0 132 975 33 243 17 343 25 0 97 1267 24 253 12 371 25 0 74 1536 18 307 12 415 21 4 60 1650 15 330 17 363 8 0 61 1568 15 313 10 369 12 0 54 1587 13 317 8 371 19 63 1560 15 390 15 380 17 78 1663 19 415 15 335 21 87 1583 21 395 25 371 17 86 1563 21 390 25 339 17 123 1548 30 387 34 404 36 158 1697 39 424 41 371 45 198 1723 49 430 79 397 82 292 1733 73 433 114 376 110 474 1765 118 441 164 224 136 619 1500 154 375 149 263 155 630 1458 157 364 198 250 179 783 1307 195 326 235 218 239 1081 1047 270 261 268 229 255 1216 980 304 245 294 224 289 1261 856 315 214 324 203 335 1471 891 367 222 356 192 313 1525 815 381 203 386 198 348 1639 778 409 194 332 172 354 1558 765 389 191 356 140 324 1516 635 379 158 294 168 289 1312 689 328 172 285 147 306 1320 577 330 144 246 177 272 1101 700 275 175 268 188 250 1178 689 294 172 250 168 270 1109 601 277 150 224 144 242 1083 562 270 140 214 157 192 935 495 233 123 216 168 237 1109 558 277 139 216 147 244 1097 455 274 113 231 134 257 1084 424 271 106 252 95 250 1039 387 259 96 205 125 270 1103 360 275 90 281 92 261 1291 303 322 75 ----------------------------------------------------------- 19508 8744 0 0 83803 20531 8:00 7:45 1430 1350 17:15 12:15 1548 1207 I Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 (Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF L TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 2 am -pm----am -pm I 00:15 103 378- 00:30 60 412 00:45 82 389 01:00 60 458 01:15 45 425 01:30 41 404 01:45 38 393 I 02:00 49 466 02:15 25 436 02:30 17 367 02:45 289 28 432 03:00 397 21 434 I 03:15 367 19 380 03:30 371 10 404 03:45 406 25 464 04:00 380 15 415 04:15 438 28 490 I 04:30 417 12 460 04:45 438 17 441 05:00 508 23 443 05:15 484 19 495 05:30 523 25 [34 I 05:45 425 34 06:00 475 45 06:15 529 73 06:30 533 110 510 I 06:45 471 121 505 07:00 393 224 464 07:15 404 246 384 07:30 326 274 365 07:45 270 311 371 08:00 283 378 311 08:15 242 389 343 08:30 214 378 246 08:45 237 369 274 09:00 196 384 270 I 09:15 190 430 237 09:30 222 425 233 09:45 175 339 239 10:00 149 371 216 10:15 147 367 183 I 10:30 155 298 151 10:45 129 302 185 11:00 123 337 168 11:15 103 373 162 11:30 108 350 131 11:45 112 352 164 12:00 114 371 125 ------------------------------- TALS 11743 25688 Times 8:45 AM Peaks 1608 M Times 18:00 17:45 M Peaks 2008 2072 Flox FS 19 WED 26 am pm ----------- 103 417 71 490 86 482 75 453 67 458 49 462 45 462 54 458 41 482 23 460 41 510 28 466 25 499 21 469 25 503 17 536 25 533 19 557. 8 607 21 600 19 642 30 661 43 726 56 652 82 691 97 667 118 538 226 445 296 443 265 417 281 367 348 361 358 326 343 287 404 296 348 304 434 285 356 306 315 283 317 242 343 265 348 224 332 188 382 205 367 159 395 123 386 147 430 181 ------------ 26902 11:15 1578 17:45 2736 A-10o ida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 2 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User: Direction: WEST THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am- -pm - -am pm- 127 462 131 430 464 1707 116 426 95 460 101 490 327 1852 61 463 79 495 110 482 357 1848 89 462 90 520 90 469 315 1900 78 475 88 501 75 484 275 1868 68 467 56 469 77 527 223 1862 55 465 58 449 64 430 205 1734 51 433 58 399 58 479 219 1802 54 450 60 436 75 514 201 1868 50 467 38 441 47 445 125 1713 31 428 41 419 45 503 155 2153 38 430 30 441 36 490 115 2228 28 445 21 425 34 134 99 1805 24 361 32 380 30 0 93 1624 23 324 28 449 32 0 110 1822 27 364 21 441 28 81 1772 20 443 25 469 54 132 1930 33 482 12 453 19 62 1887 15 471 21 490 25 71 1976 17 494 25 4 5 21 90 2046 22 511 25 549 32 95 2170 23 542 30 518 36 121 2192 30 548 62 553 45 184 2242 46 560 54 2 58 215 2263 53 565 82 523 84 321 2257 80 564 95 516 110 412 2226 103 556 136 505 127 502 2019 125 504 211 518 192 853 1820 213 455 283 449 317 1144 1680 286 420 294 408 274 1107 1516 276 379 386 404 326 1304 1412 326 353 384 373 358 1468 1328 367 332 402 332 419 1568 1243 392 310 386 317 382 1489 1064 372 266 412 319 419 1604 1126 401. 281 408 274 415 1555 1044 388 261 419 289 447 1730 1001 432 250 380 257 341 1502 1018 375 254 371 237 369 1394 934 348 233 341 237 371 1400 844 350 211 376 201 380 1466 796 366 199 365 233 354 1365 763 341 190 397 155 363 1394 657 348 164 430 222 365 1514 718 378 179 436 172 421 1597 596 399 149 373 168 473 1591 530 397 132 419 142 408 1565 565 391 141 436 136 445 1682 556 420 139 ----------------------------------------------------------- 28145 15360 0 0 109838 26944 11:15 11:15 1664 1747 17:15 12:45 2246 1962 C / 4q .2 -Z -.55 fit/ 2Z®3 27 3o 02¢6 7 ,Z) - C- i Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 (Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF I TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 3 am pm -- am --pm 00:15 170 754 00:30 118 805 00:45 123 747 01:00 101 827 01:15 81 818 01:30 77 777 01:45 59 745 I 02:00 70 831 02:15 46 799 02:30 42 710 02:45 531 53 773 03:00 768 46 818 03:15 782 27 736 03:30 734 31 754 03:45 775 42 786 04:00 751 30 797 04:15 818 49 866 I 04:30 752 46 868 04:45 809 38 793 05:00 847 68 795 05:15 888 62 851 05:30 894 79 935 05:45 822 92 931 06:00 855 168 912 06:15 896 235 909 06:30 881 285 845 06:45 801 335 824 07:00 661 522 773 07:15 624 609 669 07:30 550 630 566 07:45 490 719 628 I 08:00 486 819 520 08:15 438 862 539 08:30 419 825 449 08:45 381 827 444 09:00 375 755 453 09:15 321 788 392 09:30 390 725 418 09:45 309 658 427 10:00 276 628 358 I 10:15 287 665 314 10:30 263 540 265 10:45 252 602 316 11:00 235 626 263 11:15 189 643 280 11:30 183 596 258 11:45 179 661 261 12:00 196 714 185 ------------------------------ LTALS 21108 47771 Times 8:00 AM Peaks 3333 M Times 17:30 17:30 M Peaks 3467 3687 1 ?. 0 7Z Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User: is 19 Direction: ROAD TOTAL WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 26 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm - - - - - 174 801 191 773 206 745 741 3073 185 768 116 889 153 723 174 792 561 3209 140 802 122 866 137 734 159 778 541 3125 135 781 124 842 126 809 144 763 495 3241 123 810 116 836 124 775 124 726 445 3155 111 788 72 823 94 711 113 656 356 2967 89 741 70 857 86 825 89 430 304 2857 76 714 84 756 81 731 86 479 321 2797 80 699 75 862 96 807 96 514 313 2982 78 745 68 766 70 767 77 445 257 2688 64 672 71 851 58 762 70 503 252 3420 63 684 40 876 42 812 61 490 189 3764 47 752 44 959 33 840 55 138 159 3455 39 691 36 961 49 743 38 0 154 3192 38 638 40 1030 38 818 44 0 164 3409 41 681 38 972 29 812 47 144 3332 36 833 50 1060 40 849 71 210 3593 52 898 36 1062 27 788 40 149 3470 37 867 31 1076 46 861 42 157 3539 39 884 57 1118 50 834 38 213 3594 53 898 64 175 59 953 68 253 3867 63 966 88 1197 71 U5 81 319 3915 79 978 116 1272 141 127 476 3975 119 993 185 1259 168 168 689 4028 172 1007 239 1205 246 747 220 940 3757 235 939 248 1179 244 779 265 1042 3684 260 921 310 946 334 755 306 1285 3326 321 831 535 697 446 736 431 1934 2867 483 716 628 689 551 678 572 2360 2660 590 665 587 624 588 '632 563 2368 2372 592 593 685 578 710 607 661 2775 2303 693 575 763 572 740 565 671 2993 2143 748 535 790 514 788 530 767 3207 2021 801 505 768 472 718 489 736 3047 1829 761 457 782 477 768 459 743 3120 1761 780 440 706 463 702 442 704 2867 1733 716 433 805 429 704 436 753 3050 1578 762 394 639 476 626 434 613 2603 1718 650 429 656 462 639 425 619 2572 1623 643 405 649 406 591 405 641 2509 1445 627 361 662 412 600 345 622 2549 1358 637 339 635 340 579 390 546 2300 1258 575 314 688 324 613 323 600 2503 1215 625 303 730 306 646 369 609 2611 1173 652 293 693 245 667 306 678 2681 1020 670 255 686 213 625 263 723 2630 917 657 229 705 218 624 267 678 2668 925 667 231 836 250 717 228 706 2973 859 743 214 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 53005 47653 24104 2 y0 0 193641 47514 t 3103 30014 2950 / pa Aw- 17:30 13794 12:15 15 4933 3784 3078 sLr TG+ 4933 3794 oy- 0.®?3 0,69 0.081 _ 7 ?3 A '-g i Site Reference: PARK PLACE Site ID: 172-07 (Location: GULF-TO-BAY, E. OF I TIME MON TUE 24 25 Lane 3 am pm -- am --pm 00:15 170 754 00:30 118 805 00:45 123 747 01:00 101 827 01:15 81 818 01:30 77 777 01:45 59 745 I 02:00 70 831 02:15 46 799 02:30 42 710 02:45 531 53 773 03:00 768 46 818 03:15 782 27 736 03:30 734 31 754 03:45 775 42 786 04:00 751 30 797 04:15 818 49 866 I 04:30 752 46 868 04:45 809 38 793 05:00 847 68 795 05:15 888 62 851 05:30 894 79 935 05:45 822 92 931 06:00 855 168 912 06:15 896 235 909 06:30 881 285 845 06:45 801 335 824 07:00 661 522 773 07:15 624 609 669 07:30 550 630 566 07:45 490 719 628 I 08:00 486 819 520 08:15 438 862 539 08:30 419 825 449 08:45 381 827 444 09:00 375 755 453 09:15 321 788 392 09:30 390 725 418 09:45 309 658 427 10:00 276 628 358 I 10:15 287 665 314 10:30 263 540 265 10:45 252 602 316 11:00 235 626 263 11:15 189 643 280 11:30 183 596 258 11:45 179 661 261 12:00 196 714 185 ------------------------------ LTALS 21108 47771 Times 8:00 AM Peaks 3333 M Times 17:30 17:30 M Peaks 3467 3687 1 ?. 0 7Z Florida Design Consultants Inc WEEKLY SUMMARY Page: 3 Starting: 7/24/0 File: ri\gtbl9.prn User: is 19 Direction: ROAD TOTAL WED THU FRI SAT SUN WK TOT WK AVG 26 27 28 am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm - - - - - 174 801 191 773 206 745 741 3073 185 768 116 889 153 723 174 792 561 3209 140 802 122 866 137 734 159 778 541 3125 135 781 124 842 126 809 144 763 495 3241 123 810 116 836 124 775 124 726 445 3155 111 788 72 823 94 711 113 656 356 2967 89 741 70 857 86 825 89 430 304 2857 76 714 84 756 81 731 86 479 321 2797 80 699 75 862 96 807 96 514 313 2982 78 745 68 766 70 767 77 445 257 2688 64 672 71 851 58 762 70 503 252 3420 63 684 40 876 42 812 61 490 189 3764 47 752 44 959 33 840 55 138 159 3455 39 691 36 961 49 743 38 0 154 3192 38 638 40 1030 38 818 44 0 164 3409 41 681 38 972 29 812 47 144 3332 36 833 50 1060 40 849 71 210 3593 52 898 36 1062 27 788 40 149 3470 37 867 31 1076 46 861 42 157 3539 39 884 57 1118 50 834 38 213 3594 53 898 64 175 59 953 68 253 3867 63 966 88 1197 71 U5 81 319 3915 79 978 116 1272 141 127 476 3975 119 993 185 1259 168 168 689 4028 172 1007 239 1205 246 747 220 940 3757 235 939 248 1179 244 779 265 1042 3684 260 921 310 946 334 755 306 1285 3326 321 831 535 697 446 736 431 1934 2867 483 716 628 689 551 678 572 2360 2660 590 665 587 624 588 '632 563 2368 2372 592 593 685 578 710 607 661 2775 2303 693 575 763 572 740 565 671 2993 2143 748 535 790 514 788 530 767 3207 2021 801 505 768 472 718 489 736 3047 1829 761 457 782 477 768 459 743 3120 1761 780 440 706 463 702 442 704 2867 1733 716 433 805 429 704 436 753 3050 1578 762 394 639 476 626 434 613 2603 1718 650 429 656 462 639 425 619 2572 1623 643 405 649 406 591 405 641 2509 1445 627 361 662 412 600 345 622 2549 1358 637 339 635 340 579 390 546 2300 1258 575 314 688 324 613 323 600 2503 1215 625 303 730 306 646 369 609 2611 1173 652 293 693 245 667 306 678 2681 1020 670 255 686 213 625 263 723 2630 917 657 229 705 218 624 267 678 2668 925 667 231 836 250 717 228 706 2973 859 743 214 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 53005 47653 24104 2 y0 0 193641 47514 t 3103 30014 2950 / pa Aw- 17:30 13794 12:15 15 4933 3784 3078 sLr TG+ 4933 3794 oy- 0.®?3 0,69 0.081 _ 7 ?3 A '-g HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60HERCX.hcs Page 1 A -2a HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ' Inter: GULF TO BAY / HERCULES City/St: CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK ' E/W St: GULF TO BAY N/S St: HERCULES No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width ' RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R I L T R 1 3 0 L TR 296 1992 132 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 t Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A ' Right A Peds WE Left ' Thru Right Peds NB Right ' SB Right 1 3 0 L TR 104 1774 168 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 L TR 118 412 12.0 12.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 _ A NB Left A Thru A Right Peds A SB Left A Thru A Right Peds EB Right WE Right 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A A Green 13.0 51.0 10.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summary I Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 269 1.18 0.575 152.3 F TR 2897 5038 0.79 0.575 14.0 B 30.9 C I Westbound L 62 146 1.76 0.425 433.2 F I TR 2133 5019 0.96 0.425 40.3 D 60.2 E Northbound L 91 439 1.44 0.208 296.7 F TR 726 3483 0.71 0.208 47.2 D 98.0 F Southbound L 258 0.75 0.333 42.9 D TR 1116 3349 0.77 0.333 39.4 D 40.0 D E Intersec tion Delay = 48.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D 0 49 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 176 504 282 12.0 12.0 0 HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60BELCHX.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / BELCHER Analyst: RP Date: 8/23/00 E/W St: GULF TO BAY No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T A- i City/St: CLEARWATER Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK N/S St: BELCHER -SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound R L T R L T R 1 3 0 L TR 181 1855 181 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 0 L TR 188 1668 178 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 L TR 255 954 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All o ther areas ' Signal O perations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A A NB Left ' Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds I NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right 0 122 0 5 6 A A A A A A A A 1 2 L TR 267 655 12.0 12.0 7 8 0 123 0 Green 18.0 54.0 21.0 35.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 150.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summary lAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 273 0.73 0.513 73.9 E ?TR 1806 5017 1.24 0.360 157.2 F 150.4 F Westbound L 273 0.74 0.513 74.8 E F R 1804 5012 1.10 0.360 99.1 F 96.9 F Northbound 310 11 0.95 0.407 83.1 F R 812 3479 1.52 0.233 299.3 F 257.9 F kR outhbound 310 0.92 0.407 95.5 F 806 345.5 1.03 0.233 96.4 F 96.1 F I Intersection Delay = 148.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Southbound L T R HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60OLDCX.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / OLD COACHMAN City/St. CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK ' E/W St: GULF TO BAY N/S St: OLD COACHMAN Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes 1 LGConfig L Volume 93 Lane Width 12.0 RTOR Vol 3 T 2073 12.0 1 R 78 12.0 33 1 L 68 12.0 3 TR 1885 12.0 0 401 0 1 L 65 12.0 1 0 TR 65 35 12.0 0 1 1 0 L TR 119 165 84 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 7.0 72.0 34.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs ' Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Eastbound L 166 T 2816 R 877 Westbound L 166 TR 2743 Northbound L 200 1 TR 462 -Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 0.59 0.646 28.1 C 5085 0.77 0.554 16.7 B 1583 0.05 0.554 9.0 A 0.43 0.646 18.8 B 4952 0.88 0.554 20.5 C 765 0.36 0.262 40.2 D 1765 0.24 0.262 38.1 D Approach Delay LOS 17.0 B 20.5 C 38.9 D Southbound ' L 331 1265 0.38 0.262 40.1 D TR 463 1769 0.57 0.262 43.4 D 42.3 D ' Intersection Delay = 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.2 File:6019RX.hcs Page 1 A-Z3 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / US 19 RAMPS City/St: CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: GULF TO BAY (SR 60) N/S St: US 19 RAMPS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Ea stbound Westb ound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L R L R Volume 275 1067 447 301 17 14 438 439 357 426 263 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 93 66 78 65 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 16.0 35.0 23.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 381 1770 0.78 0.215 57.8 E T 1995 5085 0.57 0.392 28.4 C 33.6 C R 621 1583 0.61 0.392 30.3 C Westbound L 477 1770 0.68 0.269 46.4 D T 2269 I 5085 0.81 0.446 28.7 C 30.1 C + R 706 1583 0.57 0.446 23.5 C Northbound L 607 3433 0.76 0.177 56.5 E I 81.6 F R 280 1583 1.05 0.177 121.0 F Southbound ,L 607 3433 0.74 0.177 55.4 E 57.1 E R 280 1583 0.74 0.177 60.9 E Intersection Delay = 41.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60BENX.hcs Page 1 A - 24- I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / BENNIGANS / MALL W. City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj # EXISTING CONDITIONS Date: 8/23/00 : Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St. MALL W. / BENNIGANS No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R L T R 1 3 0 L TR 58 1629 163 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 0 L TR 18 2257 12 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 158 14 54 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0 L TR 14 4 38 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Sig nal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A 1 Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 82.0 10.0 18.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summ ary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 57 91 1.07 0.631 164.1 F TR 3164 5016 0.60 0.631 7.3 A 12.3 B Westbound L 110 174 0.17 0.631 10.7 B TR 3205 5081 0.76 0.631 9.6 A 9.6 A Northbound L 245 1770 0.72 0.138 63.3 E TR 227 1642 0.33 0.138 51.5 D 59.8 E Southbound 1 L 136 1770 0.13 0.077 56.3 E TR 124 1611 0.41 0.077 59.4 E 58.6 E 1 Intersection Delay = 14.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60PPX.hcs Page 1 A_ 25' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / PARK PLACE / MALL E City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS i Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: PARK PLACE / MALL E. No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 1 3 0 L TR 99 1561 37 12.0 12.0 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 72 2150 99 12.0 12.0 12.0 13 1 1 0 L TR 38 18 46 12.0 12.0 0 L T R 82 25 99 12.0 12.0 12.0 15 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 69.0 31.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 234 0.45 0.662 23.7 C ' TR 2690 5068 0.63 0.531 15.9 B 16.4 B Westbound L 268 0.29 0.662 11.7 B T 2699 5085 0.86 0.531 21.8 C 21.0 C R 840 1583 0.11 0.531 10.9 B Northbound L 327 1370 0.13 0.238 39.1 D TR 396 1662 0.18 0.238 39.6 D 39.4 D Southbound L 316 1324 0.34 0.238 41.7 D T 444 1863 0.07 0.238 38.4 D 41.0 D R 377 1583 0.30 0.238 41.0 D Intersection Delay 1 = 20.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60SKYX.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / SKY HARBOR City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: SKY HARBOR DR. ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound South L T R L T R L T R L T No. Lanes 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 LGConfig TR L T LR Volume 1990 33 83 2267 35 107 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 103.0 15.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Interse ction Performanc e Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 4019 5073 Westbound L 121 153 T 4029 5085 Northbound ILR 170 1469 1 Southbound 0.53 0.792 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.74 0.792 27.4 C 0.61 0.792 0.3 A 1.2 A 1.12 0.115 161.6 F 161.6 F A- 2C? R 0 0 8 I Intersection Delay = 7.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60HAMPX.hcs Page 1 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / HAMPTON Analyst: RP 1 Date: 8/23/00 E/W St: SR 60 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R City/St: CLEARWATER, FL P`roj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Period: PM PEAK N/S St: HAMPTON RD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R L T R 1 3 0 L TR 64 1669 30 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 0 L TR 11 2306 146 12.0 12.0 0 LTR V 21 10 11 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left A NB Left A 1 Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WD Right South L T A-2-1 R 1 1 0 L TR 30 10 42 12.0 12.0 0 7 8 Green 101.0 16.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS r Eastbound L 66 85 1.02 0.777 129.6 F TR 3941 5072 0.45 0.777 0.1 A 4.8 A Westbound L 172 222 0.07 0.777 3.6 A ITR 3916 5040 0.68 0.777 0.5 A 0.5 A Northbound LTR 152 1236 0.47 0.123 55.4 E 55.4 E Southbound rL 143 1165 0.24 0.123 52.4 D TR 202 1638 0.30 0.123 52.8 D 52.6 D Intersection Delay = 4.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60mcmbrx.hcs Page 1 A - Zg HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / MCMULLEN BOOTH R City/St: CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/23/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: GULF TO BAY N/S St: MCMULLEN BOOTH RAMPS Eastb L T No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol -SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound R L T R L T R 2 3 1 L T R 408 971 331 12.0 12.0 12.0 87 2 3 1 L T R 287 1476 691 12.0 12.0 12.0 126 2 1 1 L T R 756 205 723 12.0 12.0 12.0 187 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 - EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left ' Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB. Right SB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A Green 11.0 44.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' All Red 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersec tion Performance Summary ?Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 290 3433 1.51 0.085 307.7 F T 1721 5085 0.61 0.338 34.8 C 103.2 F I R 536 1583 0.49 0.338 33.2 C Westbound L 290 3433 1.04 0.085 123.5 F T 1721 5085 0.90 0.338 46.2 D 72.1 E R 536 1583 1.11 0.338 113.6 F Northbound L 449 3433 1.91 0.131 475.6 F IT 373 1863 0.62 0.200 50.8 D 418.3 F R 317 1583 1.92 0.200 478.0 F Southbound IL 449 3433 0.76 0.131 61.9 E T 373 1863 0.01 0.200 41.7 D 57.9 E R 317 1583 0.62 0.200 51.4 D a Intersec tion Delay = 170.8 (sec/veh) Interse ction LOS = F Southbound L T R 2 1 1 L T R 314 5 231 12.0 12.0 12.0 49 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/HAINES BAYSHORE City/St: P INELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: E XISTING CONDITIONS 20 00 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: HAINES BAYSHORE N/S St: U .S.19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Nor thbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ' No. Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 LGConfig LTR LT R L T R L T R Volume 35 0 44 53 0 215 27 3770 63 160 2834 10 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 43 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.0 7.0 27.0 152.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 1 LTR 122 1330 0.72 0.092 124.8 F 124.8 F Westbound ' LT 66 718 0.89 0.092 182.6 F 266.2 F R 145 1583 1.32 0.092 292.0 F Northbound 1 L 52 1770 0.58 0.029 129.9 F T 3220 5085 1.30 0.633 181.8 F 178.7 F R 1003 1583 0.07 0.633 16.9 B Southbound L 310 1770 0.57 0.175 93.4 F T 3962 5085 0.79 0.779 16.6 B 20.6 C R 1233 1583 0.01 0.779 5.9 A Intersec tion Delay = 114.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F A -30 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/BELLEAIR RD City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: BELLEAIR RD N/S St: U.S. 19 ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R L T R 1 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width IRTOR Vol 1 1 1 L T R 161 28 281 12.0 12.0 12.0 98 L TR 139 51 86 12..0 12.0 17 2 3 1 L T R 368 3583 69 12.0 12.0 12.0 14 1 3 1 L T R 53 2484 179 12.0 12.0 12.0 54 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left A NB Left A A ? Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds INB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 47.0 17.0 16.0 128.0 , Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs l Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 194 991 0.89 0.196 130.4 F I T 365 1863 0.08 0.196 79.0 E 108.1 F R 310 1583 0.64 0.196 92.9 F Westbound L 269 1374 0.64 0.196 93.7 F TR 333 1702 0.44 0.196 85.9 F 90.1 F Northbound 1L 586 3433 0.65 0.171 95.5 F T 3220 5085 1.16 0.633 119.4 F 115.8 F R 1003 1583 0.06 0.633 16.8 B ISouthbound L 125 1770 0.45 0.071 109.5 F T 2712 5085 0.96 0.533 64.1 E 63.3 E R 844 1583 0.16 0.533 28.6 C I Interse ction Delay = 95.2 (sec/veh) In tersection LOS = F 8 n-3 I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/NURSERY RD Analyst: JC ' Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: NURSERY RD No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj $#: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R Southbound L T R 1 1 L TR 142 42 12.0 12.0 0 161 95 0 1 1 LT R 17 34 50 12.0 12.0 10 1 3 1 L T R 261 3551 18 12.0 12.0 12.0 5 1 3 1 L T R 60 2538 375 12.0 12.0 12.0 150 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A ? Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 36.0 17.0 18.0 137.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Lastbound L 164 1093 0.96 0.150 160.6 ' TR 254 1693 0.47 0.150 94.7 Westbound 'LT 209 1390 0.36 0.150 92.7 R 237 1583 0.25 0.150 90.6 Northbound L 317 1770 0.86 0.179 115.8 T 3454 5085 1.07 0.679 77.0 R 1075 1583 0.01 0.679 12.5 Southbound F F F F F E B Approach Delay LOS 132.2 F 91.8 F 79.4 E L 125 1770 0.50 0.071 110.7 F T 2903 5085 0.91 0.571 50.9 D 50.2 D R 904 1583 0.26 0.571 26.1 C Intersection Delay = 69.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E 1 A -32 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/HARN BLVD Analyst: JC Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: HARN BLVD ' No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION'SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R L T R 1 1 1 L T R 117 18 43 12.0 12.0 12.0 20 Southbound L T R 1 1 1 L T R 112 25 55 12.0 12.0 12.0 31 1 3 1 L T R 76 3615 52 12.0 12.0 12.0 22 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 24.0 Yellow 5.0 All Red 3.0 1 3 1 L T R 23 2818 135 12.0 12.0 12.0 40 5 6 7 A A A A A A A A A A 17.0 150.0 17.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 8 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 138 1375 1.21 0.100 251.9 T 186 1863 0.14 0.100 98.9 R 158 1583 0.21 0.100 99.9 Westbound L 138 1379 0.94 0.100 166.4 ' T 186 1863 0.16 0.100 99.1 R 158 1583 0.18 0.100 99.5 orthbound f 125 1770 0.62 0.071 117.8 3708 5085 1.01 0.729 48.5 R 1154 1583 0.03 0.729 9.0 'Southbound F F F F F F F D A Approach Delay LOS 212.1 F 145.9 F 49.6 D L 1.& 5 1-/-/U U. 2u 0.071 105.9 F T 3708 5085 0.83 0.729 23.8 C 24.0 C IR 1154 1583 0.09 0.729 9.4 A Intersection Delay = 46.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D /,--?-> 3 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/DRUID AND SEVILLE City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DRUID/SEVILLE N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width IRTOR Vol 0 1 1 LT R 21 52 105 12.0 12.0 21 1 1 1 L LT R 92 42 70 12..0 12.0 12.0 0 1 5 0 L TR 87 3598 102 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 0 L TR 28 2779 15 12.0 12.0 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds `NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.0 24.0 17.0 120.0 17.0 'Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ,Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound iLT 168 1836 0.52 0.092 106.8 F 113.1 F R 145 1583 0.69 0.092 118.7 F Westbound I L 177 1770 0.60 0.100 109.2 F LT 186 1863 0.26 0.100 100.6 F 106.1 F R 158 1583 0.51 0.100 105.3 F Northbound ,L 125 1770 0.70 0.071 125.5 F TR 5099 8440 0.73 0.604 34.3 C 36.4 D Southbound I L 125 1770 0.23 0.071 106.3 F TR 3070 5081 0.95 0.604 51.5 D 52.0 D I Intersection Delay = 47.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D A-34- 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: U.S. 19 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 1 2 1 L T R 182 478 234 12.0 12.0 12.0 47 1 2 0 L TR 186 342 207 12.0 12.0 41 1 3 1 L T R 249 3244 306 12.0 12.0 12.0 61 Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 159 1989 175 12.0 12.0 12.0 35 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0 37.0 24.0 77.0 42.0 ' Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 148 1770 1.47 0.083 352.8 F T 546 3539 1.04 0.154 151.4 F 191.2 F R 244 1583 0.91 0.154 135.4 F Westbound L 148 1770 1.38 0.083 316.8 F TR 519 3366 1.08 0.154 162.7 F 204.0 F Northbound L 310 1770 0.85 T 2691 5085 1.28 R 838 1583 0.31 Southbound L 177 1770 0.95 T 2309 5085 0.92 R 719 1583 0.21 ' Interse ction Delay = 147.6 0.175 116.2 F 0.529 186.6 F 171.7 F 0.529 32.1 C 0.100 161.8 F 0.454 67.6 E 72.4 E 0.454 39.6 D (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/N.E. COACHMAN City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: N.E. COACHMAN N/S St: U.S. 19 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width t RTOR Vol Eastb L T SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY F- I Westbound I Northbound R L T R L T R 2 1 1 L T R 266 427 27 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 2 1 1 L T R 96 447 269 12.0 12.0 12.0 54 1 3 1 L T R 112 3398 123 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 3 1 L T R 171 2200 226 12.0 12.0 12.0 45 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 25.0 34.0 17.0 99.0 25.0 ' Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 358 3433 0.83 0.104 120.1 F T 264 1863 1.80 0.142 475.7 F 329.7 F R 224 1583 0.13 0.142 90.4 F Westbound L 358 3433 0.29 0.104 99.8 F T 264 1863 1.86 0.142 504.2 F 360.6 F R 224 1583 1.05 0.142 177.9 F Northbound I L 184 1770 0.64 0.104 110.2 F T 2797 5085 1.27 0.550 176.5 F 169.4 F R 871 1583 0.15 0.550 26.5 C Southbound 1 L 125 1770 1.46 0.071 355.4 F T 2627 5085 0.89 0.517 56.2 E 74.5 E R 818 1583 0.24 0.517 32.1 C I Intersection Delay = 173 .1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F A -3eo ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/SUNSET POINT RD Analyst: JC ' Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: SUNSET POINT RD i No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 2 2 1 L T R 482 520 223 12.0 12.0 12.0 45 2 2 1 L T R 215 551 212 12..0 12.0 12.0 42 2 3 1 L T R 259 3256 123 12.0 12.0 12.0 25 Southbound L T R 2 3 1 L T R 101 1608 276 12.0 12.0 12.0 55 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds t NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 25.0 30.0 17.0 85.0 43.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 358 3433 1.48 0.104 338.2 F ' T 442 3539 1.29 0.125 252.4 F 274.4 F R 198 1583 0.99 0.125 165.7 F Westbound L 358 3433 0.66 0.104 107.8 F T 442 3539 1.37 0.125 284.9 F 220.1 F R 198 1583 0.94 0.125 152.4 F Northbound ' L 615 3433 0.44 0.179 88.4 F T 2881 5085 1.19 0.567 141.0 F 134.1 F R 897 1583 0.11 0.567 24.2 C ' Southbound L 243 3433 0.44 0.071 108.2 F T 2331 5085 0.73 0.458 53.9 D 55.3 E R 726 1583 0.32 0.458 41.5 D ' Intersection Delay = 147 .6 (sec/ve h) Interse ction LOS = F A-37 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: BELCHER RD/DREW ST Analyst: JC ' Date: 8/30/00 E/W St: DREW ST ' No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 266 665 92 12.0 12.0 0 City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: BELCHER RD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 173 580 186 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 80 1063 170 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 144 780 59 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A A ? Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 21.0 45.0 11.0 53.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 150.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS , Eastbound L 341 0.92 0.473 69.5 E ' TR 1043 3475 0.85 0.300 56.4 E 59.8 E Westbound L 321 0.56 0.473 35.5 D ' TR 1023 3410 0.78 0.300 51.9 D 48.9 D orthbound f 228 0.40 0.460 29.5 C R 1225 3466 1.14 0.353 123.3 F 117.5 F Southbound L 203 0.79 0.460 87.3 F TR 1237 3502 0.75 0.353 45.4 D 51.6 D ' Intersection Delay = 73.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E A -3?B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter:. DREW ST/ OLD COACHMAN City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/31/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: OLD COACHMAN RD ' No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R 1 2 0 L TR 40 783 156 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 260 680 131 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 179 377 121 12.0 12.0 12.0 48 Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 23 201 80 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0 33.0 15.0 32.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Interse ction Pe rformance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 387 0.11 0.483 20.2 C ' TR 949 3451 1.09 0.275 99.1 F 95.8 F Westbound L 387 0.71 0.483 53.2 D ' TR 950 3453 0.90 0.275 53.3 D 53.2 D Northbound I L 386 0.55 0.433 25.5 C T 497 1863 0.89 0.267 60.7 E 47.6 D R 422 1583 0.20 0.267 34.4 C Southbound ' L 313 0.09 0.433 23.2 C TR 475 1783 0.69 0.267 43.7 D 42.1 D ' Intersection Delay = 64.7 (sec/veh) Interse ction LOS = E Al - 39 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/FAIRWOODS AVE Analyst: JC ' Date: 8/24/00 E/W St: DREW ST No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume ' Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: FAIRWOODS AVE/PARK PLACE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R 1 2 0 L TR 216 670 57 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 40 505 164 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 107 112 104 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 52 29 123 12.0 12.0 0 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 58.0 17.0 ' Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 532 0.45 0.730 6.1 A ' TR 2029 3498 0.40 0.580 11.6 B 10.3 B Westbound 1 L 522 0.09 0.730 4.7 A TR 1977 3409 0.40 0.580 11.6 B 11.2 B Northbound L 164 965 0.79 0.170 62.6 E T 317 1863 0.43 0.170 38.1 D 46.4 D R 269 1583 0.47 0.170 38.8 D Southbound I L 189 1112 0.30 0.170 37.2 D TR 278 1637 0.60 0.170 42.0 D 40.8 D Intersection Delay = 19.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B A-4a ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/HAMPTON RD City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj ##: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 ' Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: HAMPTON RD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 2 0 TR 784 42 12.0 0 L T 35 562 12.0 12.0 1 0 1 L R 147 40 12.0 12.0 8 0 0 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Pe s- Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 73.0 17.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1 Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 2564 3512 0.34 0.730 4.9 A 4.9 A Westbound ' L 422 578 0.09 0.730 4.0 A T 2583 3539 0.24 0.730 4.5 A 4.4 A Northbound ' L 301 1770 0.65 0.170 43.7 D 42.2 D R 269 1583 0.16 0.170 35.7 D ' Southbound Intersection Delay = 9.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A A-41 ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: MCMULLEN-BOOTH/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: MCMULLEN-BOOTH RD ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R L T R No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume ' Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 1 1 L LT R 365 196 263 12.0 12.0 12.0 53 L TR 42 174 17 12.0 12.0 0 1 3 0 L TR 154 3020 38 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds ' WB Left A SE Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 210.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 152 1770 2.45 0.086 766.8 F LT 160 1863 1.25 0.086 249.7 F R 136 1583 1.57 0.086 386.4 F Westbound L 84 1770 0.64 0.048 113.8 F TR 88 1838 2.78 0.048 933.6 F Northbound L 84 1770 1.93 0.048 558.4 F TR 3626 5076 0.89 0.714 26.5 C Approach Delay LOS 531.6 F 785.5 F 52.0 D Southbound L 84 1770 0.25 0.048 97.9 F TR 3573 5002 0.65 0.714 16.3 B 17.1 B Intersection Delay = 127.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F 1 3 0 L TR 18 1749 269 12.0 12.0 54 6 7 A A A A A A A 134.0 10.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 8 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 /-\_ 42- TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: HAMPTON RD/BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE Analyst: JC Project No.: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2000 Date: 8/24/00 ' East/West Street: BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE North/South Street: HAMPTON RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 211 15 31 67 0 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 251 17 41 90 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 5 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? ' Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 ' Lane Conf ig L Queue Length, and Level of SB Westbound 4 I 7 8 9 L LTR v (vpn) 0 41 56 ' C(m) (vph) 1505 1296 734 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.08 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.15 Control Delay 7.4 7.9 10.3 LOS A A B Approach Delay 10.3 Approach LOS B 17 0 11 5 0 8 34 0 22 9 0 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR No 0 1 0 LTR Service Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR 23 817 0.03 0.00 9.5 A 9.5 A 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 APPENDIX B ITEM PAGE ART_TAB S.R. 60 (Keene - U.S. 19) B-1 ART_TAB S.R. 60 (U.S. 19 - Bayshore Bridge) B-2 ART_TAB U.S. 19 (Haines Bayshore - S.R. 60) B-3 FDOT Generalized Two-Way Peak Hour Table B-4 FDOT Generalized Peak Hour Peak Directional Table B-5 Off Peak Directional Table B-6 Signal Timings B-7 to B-10 R? I i =TAB M of Service Volume Tables 1987 Highway Capacity Manual Update ment of Transportation User Notes JEXISTING CONDITIO TRAFFIC CHARACTE IS C Range- k Factor _ 0.082 (0-06-0,20 D Factor` 0.52 (13.50-.1,00 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 (i) 70 1'.00 Adj Saturation Flow Rate 1850 % Turns from Exclusive Lane 12 (1400-2000) (0 - 100) PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.38095 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 690 970 11030 2 N/A N/A 1,480 1.960 3 NTA 2,270 2,960 3,090 4 N/A N/A 3,070 3,950 4,120 PEAK 41"110 X1r%1 1I11AC io"TU nr,r-?.r........ ' ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, ' or Rural Area Type U (U, T, or R) Arterial Class 2 (1,2,3, or 4) Free Flow Speed(mph) 40 (45, 40, or 35) Total Length of Arterial(mi) 2.1 ' Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS ' No.Signalized Intersections 5 Arrival Type,Peak Dir 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) Type Signal System S (P, S, or A) System Cycle Length(sec) 150 (60 - 240 Sec) Weighted Thru Mvmt /C 0.49 0.20 - 0.80 Note that intersection capacity is reached at LOS 'E'. Constant volumes across the remaining LOS ranges indicate that these levels are not achievable. Higher volumes result in an 'F'. (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.38095 Intersections per mile Level of Service kNES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 1,330 1,870 1,980 4 - N/A N/A 2,840 3,770 3,960 6 NIA WA 4,370 5,690 5,940 8 N/A 5,910 7,600 7,920 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.38095 Intersections per mile Level of Service ONES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 16,200 22,800 24,200 4 N/A N/A 34,600 46,000 48,300 6 N/A N/A 53,300 69,300 72,500 8 N/A N/A 72,100 92,700 96,600 11 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right vlc Ratio for the Full Hour Level of Service kN ES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.67 0.94 1.00 2 N/A N/A 0.72 0.95 1.00 3 N/A N/A 0.74 0.96 1.00 4 N/A N/A 0.75 0.96 1.00 OFF- Pe?AK C D P 2100 27 30 2850 RKT- VA ?turriberof Lanes.: 6LD AADT 9,456 - User Notes I' EXISTING CONDITIONS CHA E ISTI K Factor ! 0.087 13:Factor ! 0.57 Peak Hour'Factor 0.94 Adj Saturation Flow Rate 1850 % Turns from Exclusive Lane 12 33.1 Volume Tables way Capacity Manual Update Transportation LANES 1 2 4 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4 Intersections per mile Level of Service A B C D E 1,080 2,170 E ,890 ,810 N/A 1,180 1,730 N/A 2,580 3,570 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural Area Type U Arterial Class 2 Free Flow Speed(mph) 45 Total Length of Arterial(mi) 1.5 Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (Y/N) Y (U, T, or R) (1,2,3, or 4) (45, 40, or 35) SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS No.Signalized Intersections 6 Arrival Type,Peak Dir 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) Type Signal System S (P, S, or A) System Cycle Length(sec) 130 (60 - 240 sec) Weiqhted Thru Mvmt q/C 0.53 (0.20 - 0.80) N/A (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 4 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A N/A 13,600 19,900 21,700 4 N/A N/A 29,600 41,000 43,800 6 N/A N/A 45,800 62,600 65,900 8 N/A N/A 62,100 84,500 88,000 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for the Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 0.60 0.88 0.97 2 N/A N/A 0.66 0.91 0.97 3 N/A N/A 0.68 0.93 0.98 4 N/A N/A 0.69 0.94 0.98 I 'T i o x.35o 24 E-3 ?ESCRIPTION ----------- - US 19~ 33.1 Volume Tables way Capacity Manual Update Transportation PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Inclu des vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.43902 I ntersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 N/A 740 1,200 1,340 1,410 2 N/A 1,560 2,460 2,710 2,820 3 N/A 2,370 3,730 4,080 4.230 4 N/A 3,190 5,010 5,450 5,630 jPM Peak AUGUST 2000 6LD 7,733 EXISTING CONDITIO S 0.08 i 0.56 12 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural Area Type U (U, T, or R) Arterial Class 1 (1,2,3, or 4) Free Flow Speed(mph) 50 (55,50,45,40,35) Total Length of Arterial(mi) 2.05 Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (Y/N) Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS No.Signalized Intersections 5 Arrival Type,Peak Dir 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) Type Signal System S (P, S, or A) System Cycle Length(sec) 240_ (60 - 240 Sec) Weighted Thru Mvmt g/C `0.67 (0.20 - 0.80) Note that intersection capacity is reached at LOS 'E'. Constant volumes across the remaining LOS ranges indicate that these levels are not achievable. Higher volumes result in an 'F'. (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.43902 Intersections per mile Level of Servi ce ONES A B C D E 2 N/A 1,330 2,140 2,400 2,520 4 N/A 2,780_ 4,390 _4,840 5,030 6 N/A 4,240 6,660 7,290 7,550 8 N/A 5,690 8,950 9,730 10,060 (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.43902 Intersections per mile Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 N/A 15,300 24,600 27,600 28,900 4 N/A 32,000 50,400 55,600 57,800 6 N/A 48,700 76,500 83,700 86,700 8 N/A 65,500 102,900 111,900 115,600 N/A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for the Full Hour Level of Service LAN ES A B C D E 1 N/A 0.53 0.85 0.95 1.00 2 N/A 0.55 0.87 0.96 1.00 3 N/A 0.56 0.88 0.97 1.00 4 N/A 0.57 0.89 0.97 1.00 ?e 187d z 9 3 0 3210 33 20 l+7f?[:a Department ::i 0#: Table 5-7 GENERALIZED TWO WAY PEAK HOUR VOL UMES -.- FLORIDA'S U RBANIZ ED AREA S* STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS FREEWAYS UMNTERFW ED FLOW Unsignal(zed GrOUp1 (vA#dn urbanized area mer500,000 and leading to or Passi ng wiW n s miles of the Lanes/ Level of Service orimarv eiN central business district) Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided 810 1,270 1,720 2,260 3,010 Lanes Level of Service A 4 Divided 1,950 3,260 4,560 5,470 6 Divided 2,930 4 890 6 840 8 21 6,510 4 B C D 1 3,000 4,500 5 E 7200 , , , 0 9,770 6 2,900 4,600 7,000 8,900 11,000 8 3,900 6,300 9,500 12,200 15,100 10 4,900 7,900 11,900 15,200 18 800 INTERRUPTED FLOW 12 5,700 9,300 13,900 17,900 , 22,100 Class 1 (h0.00 to IM signalized intersections permile) Group 2 Mithin urbaMZed area and not in Grow 11 Lanes/ Level of Service Divided X. B C D••• E••• Lanes Level of Service A 2 Undivided N/A 1,000 1,450 1,550 4 Divided N/A 2 190 3 11550 4 B C D 1,900 3,000 4,500 5,800 E 6 ? Ric , ,080 3,260 6 Divided N/A 3,330 4,640 4 890 3,260 4 890 6 8 3,000 4,600 7,000 8,900 ' 10,500 ,' ' , 8 Divided NIA 4,210 5,710 5,990 , 5 990 10 4,000 6,300 9,500 12,100 14,400 9,9 ¢(.t7 2-0aD Z4 25 '3?OD , '3 LOOP 12 5,000 7,900 11,900 15,100 5 900 9 300 13 900 17 18,000 w w SS 11 ? - n l m 47 . . . ,700 21,100 (y00 to 4.50 signalized in ten ection pe il Lanes/ Level of Service NON-STATE ROADWAYS Divided X. B•• C D E MAJOR aTY/CCUNTY ROADWAYS 2 Undivided N/A N/A 920 1,390 1 500 4 Divided N/A N/A 2,130 3,020 , 3,190 Lanes Level of Service X* B•• 6 Divided N/A N/A 3,300 4,550 4,810 2 Urttivided C D NIA 780 - - E p ` 8 Divided N/A N/A 4,160 5,590 4 C, - 5,900 4 Divided 1 ,iju N/A N/A 1,810 2,880 1,450 3,080 L- - 21725 213Ta 30-,'? D 6 Divided N/A N/A 2,800 4,350 4 640 _R 42L_D - - 31 -657 413 Class III , (more man 4.50 signalized intersections per mile and not Q 1n primary city - central business district of urbanized area ove 500 00 r . 0) AFTER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS Lanes) Level of Service La nes/ (signalized intersection analysis) Divided /4 • B" C D E Lanes 2 Undivided W. B•• C D NIA NIA E 2 Undivided N/A N/A 310 1,110 4 Divided N/A N/A 7 1,450 4 Divided 430 990 N/P N/A 1,060 2,170 1,090 2 310 20 2,560 3,090 . 6 Divided N/A N/A 1,120 3,960 4,650 8 Divided N/A N/A 1,410 4,990 5,710 ADJUSTMENTS Class IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersections permile and within primary city central business di bi t f i DNIDEDAA4MtDED s c o urban zed area over500.000) (after corresponding twoway volume indicated percent) Left Turn Adjustment Lanes/ Level of Service Lanes Median Bays Factors Divided X. B•• C D E 2 Divided Yes i5% i 2 Undivided N/A N/A 340 1,270 1,410 2 Multi Und vided No -20% Undivided Yes 4 Divided N/A N/A 820 2,750 6 Divided N/A N/A 2,990 Multi -5% Undivided No -25% 1,290 4,190 4,510 8 Divided N/A N/A 1,610 5,170 5,530 ONE-WAY (allercorresponding twaway volume indicated percent) The Florida Department of Transportation Source: Systems Planning Office Adjustment 605 Suwannee Street -Mail Station 19 Lanes Lanes La Eq"lent rvroWey Lanes Factors Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 2 - 40% 4 3 6 -40% http://www.dot.state.f1.us/planning 4 8 -40% 5 8 25 ' The table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for eneral la i li should be used for more specific planning ap lications t bl Th g p d d i nn ng app ca tions. The computer models from which this table is derived p . e a e a fi n er ving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection des ign where , more re ned techniques exist. Values shown are two-way hourly maximum volumes for levels of service, and are based on the 1997 Update to the Highwa Capacity Manual and Florida traffic, roadway, and signalization data. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes these volume t b d y i i , s mus e an appropriate K100 factor (riot peak-to-daily ratio). The table's input value assumptions and level of service criteria appear on the followin a e v ded by " Cannot be achieved. g p g . " Volumes are comparable because intersection capacities have been reached . September 1 998 A uo,? I T a Table 5-1 GENERALIZED PEAK HO UR PEAK DIRECTIONAI- E..- .-i.. URBANIZED AREA S* STATE TRD- WAY ARTERIALS FREEWAYS UNINTERRUPTED FLOW Unsi gnall zed Group 1 tMtlNn udtanlzed wee over 500000 and leading tow passing within 5 miles of the Len a s/ Level of Service ndmaw city camtal Mrsinaas distdcn DI vi ded A B C D E 2 Undivided 460 720 980 1,280 1,710 Lanes Lev at of Serv ice A B C 40 ivided 6Divided 1,110 11850 2,590 3,110 1,670 2 780 3 890 4 660 3,700 4 55 D 1,060 1,720 2,570 3,310 E 4,090 , , , 50 6 1,630 2,630 3,950 5(ef? 6,270 8 2,220 3,590 5,390 6,930 8,550 10 2,780 4,490 6,730 8,660 10 690 INTERRUPTED FLOW 12 3,260 5,270 7,900 10,160 , 12,540 Class I 6d.ob b 1.99 a gnallzea nleoaetlons per mile) Group 2 MtMn umaMZed area arM not in Caow 11 Lane a/ Of vi ded Level of Service X. B C ••• ••• Level of Service 2 Undivided D N/ A 570 820 880 E Lanes 880 4 A B C D 090 1 710 2 570 3 270 E 3 4 Divided 6 Divided N/ A 1,280 1,750 1,850 N/ A 1 890 2 640 2 781) 1,850 6 2 7 , , , 660 2,630 3,950 5,030 F ,900 5,990 8 Divided , , , N/ A 2,390 3,240 3 400 , 80 8 3 400 10 290 3,590 5,390 6,860 8,170 Ct -5 4 L-c> , 1 1 I "Co 0 ( go o , 1-740 12 860 4,490 6,740 8,580 3..350 5.270 7,900 10,050 10,210 11 970 1 C? 55 if , , ? n 1f 2/640 2 0 l)J l 5 m ` !?p'Sa , ( . 0 to 4.50 signal 'rt eseceon s i?j Lanes/ Level of Service NON- STATE ROADWAYS Of vi ded X. B•• C D E MAJOR CITY/COUNTY ROADWAYS 2 Undivided N/ A N/ A 520 790 850 Level of Service 4 Divided N/ A N/ A 1,21(1 1,710 1,810 Lanes A • B•• C D E 6 Divided 8 Divided N/ A N/ A 1,880 2,580 N/ A N/ 2,730 2 Undivided , , N/ A N/ A 440 .760 830 - 7 4W A 2,360 3,180 _ 3,350 4 Divided ' N/ A N/ A 1,030 1,640 1.750 1111so i40Z5 i2a 6Divided I N/A N/A 1,590 2.470 2 640 4-° CIaSS 11? _ ,. 1-1 SS 24SD (ma a fl /SO '2515 , an signalized intersections par mile and not Mthin pd mary city central business district of urbanized area over 500,0001 OTHER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS Lanes/ Level of Service Lanes (signalm9dintersection analysis) X. •• DI vi ded X. B•• C D E 2Unclivided B C D N/ N/ 250 560 E 620 2 Undivided N/ A N/ A 170 630 820 4 Divided N/ N/ 600 1 230 1 310 4 Divided N/ A N/ A 410 1,450 1,750 , 6 Divided N/ A N/ A 630 2,260 2,640 8 Divided N/A N/ A 800 2,830 3,240 ADJUSTMENTS Class IV (more than 450 signalized intersections per mile and Mthin pdmary city central M i ' DNIDEDIUNOWIDED u n,t<a d ieMrr M rr4wnhad sine nvw Slxl MM1 (anercortesporrdMg diiecdww volume indcated pmwt) Left Turn Adjust men Lanes/ Level of Service Lanes Me di an Bay a It Fact ors Of vi ded X. B•- C D 2 E Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided A A 190 720 2 800 Multi Undivided No _20% Undivided Yes -5% 4 Divided N/ A N/ A 470 1,560 1,700 Multi Undivided No -25% 6 Divkfed N/ A N/ A 730 2,380 2,560 8 Divided N/ A N/ A 920 2,930 3,140 ONE- WAY (alter corresponding direcbonal volume indicated percent) The Florida Department of Transportation Source: Systems Planning Office One- Way Lanes Adjust men 605 Suwannee Street - Mail Station 19 Ta-Wav wee It Fact ors Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 2 4 +20% 3 6 +20% http:/ / www.dot state fl us/ plannin 4 8 +20% . . . g 5 8 +50% The table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models f rom which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications, The table and deriving computer mod els should not be used for corridor or intersection desig n where more refined t echniques exist- Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels of service, and are based on the 1997 Update to the Highway , Capacity Manual and Florida traffic, roadway, and signaGmtion data. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must be divided b an appropriate D factor and K100 factor (not peak-to-daily ratio). y The table's input value assumptions and level of service criteria appear on the followin page. g •' Cannot be achieved. Volumes are comparable because intersection capacities have been reached . September 1998 114 is 29 16 I 0-AOR G ... ..... .. ....... ? fib. C, ?... ?.. _ CLASS S _2LV ?Za ?,?a _ ... _._...._ ....... -- 2Lla._-- CCk-AS...S•--- __. -- ..__...... -. .... 2JD$a.--- -- - -- - _ - --- -= - - _ - .._._ _._ ._---- -.............. .... -- ------------- - - - - - - - - --- - 34o _. _....._._._ _._..._..-- ---:..C.OU •JV-C.Y._...._I?R.'z.L..SZ1?l..?...- -- ----._.__...!4...------ - -... ---. B ...... .-- -._.??'- _. .. _-- --- ---._.. ._..__ _- .- ----- ____.___......_ _ -- --------- - ------- 2- _ -? ?o - -- - - - - -- - r 3 _ . _ .__r.$ --?- ?'--- _- ?i ----- - -- ------------ A of To S ql6c) r f i -- - - I V vi 1??etltax (Z-? i ?- 24c7 - 2$._..... s. e -Ca g« ?-5 °?<< -- . -------- -- ---- ---------- ---- - - - ----- _.sGy 32 ???- - F> rCt i I ? -- -.i.._ ii ._??.?-... ..... . 1B ?7 dec. J?? She,. . `?t- 4 3cL ............. . ... ......... I ... _ _ _ ._..-_ ..-- - -- - - --..------ -? tav _= -------------- I? ,I ----- ------- ------- -- - --------------- I i ......... --.--. - k3 -la L_-- --- - 757' 25 sec.. 4 Set. l4 Sew. ?>i S.et- APPENDIX C a ITEM PAGE Intersection Impact Charts C-1 to C-3 ' HCS 2003 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/U.S. 19 Ramps C-4 HCS 2003 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Benningan's Drive C-5 HCS 2003 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/Park Place Blvd C-6 HCS 2003 Drew SVU.S. 19 C-7 HCS 2003 Drew St (Interchange)/U.S. 19 C_g HCS 2003 Drew St/Fairwoods/Park Place Blvd C-9 ' HCS 2003 Hampton Rd/Bausch & Lomb/Islands in the Sun MHP Drive C-10 HCS 2003 Hampton Rd/Parcel 6 Drive C-1 I INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT DREW ST / BELCHER RD EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 19 9 63 0 3 8 0 102 LANE CAPACITY 341 1043 321 1023 228 1225 203 1237 5621 1.81% NOTIMPACTED DREW ST / OLD COACHMAN RD EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 30 0 81 0 0 4 0 115 LANE CAPACITY 387 949 387 950 386 497 422 313 475 4766 2.41% NOTIMPACTED DREW ST / U.S. 19 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 34 0 0 279 0 0 0 84 0 0 397 LANE CAPACITY 148 546 244 148 519 310 2691 838 177 2309 719 8649 4.59% IMPACTED DREW ST / PARK PLACE EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 118 15 0 279 9 51 0 4 476 LANE CAPACITY 543 2069 534 2017 167 323 275 193 284 6405 7.43% IMPACTED DREW ST / HAMPTON EBT+R WBL WBT NBL NBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 51 15 15 0 21 102 LANE CAPACITY 2564 422 2583 301 269 6139 1.66% NOTIMPACTED DREW ST / MCMULLEN-BOOTH EBL EBL+T EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 45 18 0 0 8 0 0 0 19 90 LANE CAPACITY 152 160 136 84 88 84 3626 84 3573 7987 1.13% NOTIMPACTED n INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT S.R. 60 / BAYSIDE BRIDGE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 54 126 0 23 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 256 LANE CAPACITY 290 1721 536 290 1721 536 449 373 317 449 373 317 7372 3.47% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 / HAMPTON EBL EBT+R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBL+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 150 0 76 0 30 0 256 LANE CAPACITY 66 3941 172 3916 152 143 202 8592 2.98% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 / SKY HARBOR EBT+R WBL WBT NB SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 150 0 50 0 200 LANE CAPACITY 4019 121 4029 170 8339 2.40% NOTIMPACTED S.R. 60 / PARK PLACE EBL EBT+R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT+R SBL SBT SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 115 0 0 0 50 0 8 150 17 274 614 LANE CAPACITY 234 2690 268 2699 840 327 396 316 444 377 8591 7.15% IMPACTED S.R. 60 / BENNIGAN'S DRIVE EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 29 115 0 274 0 0 0 68 486 LANE CAPACITY 57 3164 110 3205 245 227 136 124 7268 6.69% IMPACTED S.R. 60 / U.S.19 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 84 0 144 198 0 0 60 0 0 486 LANE CAPACITY 381 1995 621 477 2269 706 607 280 607 280 8223 5.91% IMPACTED l INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT S.R. 60 / OLD COACHMAN EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 76 0 0 197 0 0 8 0 281 LANE CAPACITY 166 2816 877 166 2743 200 462 331 463 8224 3.42% NOT-IMPACTED S.R. 60 / BELCHER RD EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUMMATION % IMPACTED PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 61 36 144 0 15 0 0 256 LANE CAPACITY 273 1806 273 1804 310 812 310 806 6394 4.00% NOTIMPACTED I r HCS-Signals 3.2 File:6019RFUT.hcs Page 1 C- 4. HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: GULF TO BAY / US 19 RAMPS City/St: CLEARWATER Analyst: RP Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: GULF TO BAY (SR 60) N/S St: US 19 RAMPS ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbou L T R I L T R L T R L T ' No. Lanes LGConf ig folume ane Width TOR Vol 1 3 1 L T R 278 1085 452 12.0 12.0 12.0 93 1 3 1 L T R 349 1795 443 12.0 12.0 12.0 66 2 0 1 L R 444 367 12.0 12.0 78 R 2 0 1 L R 430 266 12.0 12.0 65 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds ' WB Left A SB Left A Thru A A Thru . Right A A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 16.0 35.0 23.0 ' Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130 .0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 381 1770 0.78 0.215 58.5 E ' T 1995 5085 0.58 0.392 28.6 C 33.8 C R 621 1583 0.62 0.392 30.6 C Westbound L 477 1770 0.79 0.269 52.5 D T 2269 5085 0.85 0.446 30.3 C 32.4 C R 706 1583 0.57 0.446 23.7 C Northbound ' L 607 3433 0.77 0.177 57.0 E 86.6 F R 280 1583 1.09 0.177 132.1 F I Southbound L 607 3433 0.75 0.177 55.8 E 57.8 E R 280 1583 0.76 0.177 62.1 E Intersection Delay = 42.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60BENFUT.hcs Page 1 C - ? HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / BENNIGANS MALL W. / City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj ##: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: MALL W. / BENNIGANS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L TR L TR L TR L TR .Volume 81 1656 165 18 2363 24 160 14 55 34 4 76 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 82.0 10.0 18.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Interse ction Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ,Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 w Eastbounu L 57 91 1.49 0.631 317.3 F 'TR 3164 5016 0.61 0.631 7.4 A 20.6 C Westbound L 106 168 0.18 0.631 10.8 B ?TR 3203 5078 0.80 0.631 10.4 B 10.4 B Northbound I L 245 1770 0.73 0.138 64.0 E TR 227 1641 0.34 0.138 51.5 D 60.2 E Southbound L 136 1770 0.30 0.077 58.0 E TR 123 1598 0.80 0.077 88.6 F 79.6 E Intersection Delay = 19.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.2 File:60PPFUT.hcs Page 1 C_(a HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: SR 60 / PARK PLACE / MALL E City/St: CLEARWATER, FL Analyst: RP Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 ' Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: SR 60 N/S St: PARK PLACE / MALL E. ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ' No. Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 LGConfig L TR L T R L TR L T R Volume 157 1577 37 73 2173 124 38 18 46 170 31 206 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 13 0 15 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left A A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 69.0 31.0 ' Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Pe rformance Summ ary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 234 0.71 0.662 45.5 D ' TR 2690 5068 0.64 0.531 16.0 B 18.6 B Westbound L 266 0.29 0.662 11.9 B ' T 2699 5085 0.87 0.531 22.2 C 21.4 C R 840 1583 0.14 0.531 11.2 B Northbound I L 324 1360 0.13 0.238 39.1 D TR 396 1662 0.18 0.238 39.6 D 39.4 D Southbound L 316 1 1324 0.72 0.238 53.2 D T 444 1863 0.09 0.238 38.6 D 50.4 D R 377 1583 0.68 0.238 49.7 D I Intersection Delay = 23.8 (sec/ve h) Intersection LOS = C 8 HCS-Signals 3.2 File:19DREWFUT.hcs Page 1 C_ ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: U.S. 19/DREW ST Analyst: JC ' Date: 9/8/00 E/W St: DREW ST No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Proj ##: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR N/S St: U.S. 19 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound R I L T R I L T R 1 2 1 L T R 184 486 236 12.0 12.0 12.0 47 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 188 371 272 12.0 12.0 41 1 3 1 L T R 252 3278 309 12.0 12.0 12.0 61 1 3 1 L T R 169 2010 177 12.0 12.0 12.0 35 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A ' Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0 37.0 24.0 77.0 42.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 240.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 148 1770 1.48 0.083 358.5 F T 546 3539 1.06 0.154 157.0 F 195.8 F R 244 1583 0.92 0.154 137.3 F Westbound L 148 1770 1.40 0.083 325.0 F TR 514 3336 1.29 0.154 245.2 F 264.2 F Northbound ' L 310 1770 0.86 T 2691 5085 1.30 R 838 1583 0.32 Southbound L I 177 1770 1.02 T 2309 5085 0.93 R 719 1583 0.21 I Interse ction Delay = 158.3 0.175 117.8 F 0.529 192.5 F 177.0 F 0.529 32.1 C 0.100 180.1 F 0.454 -68.8 E 75.1 E 0.454 39.7 D (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F .T NTaP ,CrIrAW6 t:: NaeoEt> HCS-Signals 3.2 File:19DREWICHNG.hcs Eastbound L T R C- S HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 WrTk Inter: U.S. 19/DREW ST City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj #: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003, WITH I Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: U.S. 19 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R Page 1 Southbound L T R 2 2 1 L T R 184 486 236 12.0 12.0 12.0 60 2 2 1 L T R 188 371 272 12.0 12.0 12.0 68 2 2 1 L T R 252 721 309 12.0 12.0 12.0 77 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 24.0 10.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0 5.0 All Red 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 343 3433 0.57 T 849 3539 0.60 ' R 380 1583 0.49 Westbound L 343 3433 0.58 ' T 849 3539 0.46 R 380 1583 0.57 Northbound L 343 3433 0.77 T 849 3539 0.89 R 380 1583 0.64 Southbound L 343 3433 0.52 T 849 3539 0.86 R 380 1583 0.37 I Intersection Delay = 42.0 L T R 169 696 177 12.0 12.0 12.0 45 6 7 8 A A A A 24.0 5.0 3.0 Approach Delay LOS 0.100 45.1 D 0.240 35.0- C 36.9 D 0.240 33.7 C 0.100 45.4 D 0.240 32.9 C 36.6 D 0.240 35.4 D 0.100 54.3 D 0.240 48.7 D 47.8 D 0.240 37.8 D 0.100 44.1 D 0.240 45.6 D 43.6 D 0.240 32.3 C (sec/veh) In ters ection LOS = D I HCS-Signals 3.2 File:DREWPARKFUT.HCS Page 1 C-9 I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: DREW ST/FAIRWOODS AVE/PARK PLA City/St: PINELLAS COUNTY Analyst: JC Proj ##: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 Period: PM PEAK HOUR E/W St: DREW ST N/S St: FAIRWOODS AVE/PARK PLACE No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R 1 2 0 L TR 218 677 69 12.0 12.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 40 510 166 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 1 L T R 195 115 119 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A A NB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WD Left A A SB Left A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WD Right Green 10.0 58.0 17.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ra tios _ Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 1 Eastbound L 528 0.46 0.730 6.1 A TR 2024 3490 0.41 0.580 11.7 B Westbound L 513 0.09 0.730 4.8 A ' TR 1977 3409 0.40 0.580 11.6 B Northbound L 163 960 1.46 0.170 279.1 F T 317 1863 0.44 0.170 38.2 D R 269 1583 0.54 0.170 40.1 D Southbound L 186 1097 0.31 0.170 37.3 D TR 278 1637 0.60 0.170 42.1 D Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 53 29 124 12.0 12.0 0 6 7 8 Approach Delay LOS 10.4 B 11.3 B 148.4 F 40.9 D 1 intersection Delay = 40.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 C.-j-0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: HAMPTON RD/BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE Analyst: JC Project No.: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 8/24/00 East/West Street: BAUSCH & LOMB DRIVE North/South Street: HAMPTON RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R VUluuic U 2 1y 15 31 69 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 260 17 41 93 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 5 ' Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 17 0 11 5 0 8 34 0 22 9 0 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 0 1 0 L'TR No 0 1 0 LTR Queue Length, and Level of SB Westbound 4 I 7 8 9 L LTR 0 41 56 1500 1286 726 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.16 7.4 7.9 10.4 A A B 10.4 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Service Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR 23 810 0.03 0.00 9.6 A 9.6 A I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: HAMPTON RD/PARCEL 6 DRIVE Analyst: JC Project No.: FUTURE CONDITIONS 2003 Date: 9/8/00 East/West Street: PARCEL 6 DRIVE North/South Street: HAMPTON ROAD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 7 220 82 2 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 244 91 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 8 0 17 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 5 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Approach Movement Lane Conf ig v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay ' Approach LOS Delay, NB 1 L 7 1501 0.00 0.00 7.4 A Queue Length, and Level of SB Westbound 4 7 8 9 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Service Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR 26 894 0.03 0.00 9.1 A 9.1 A APPENDIX D PEAINEERS, ORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER; FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 Fax: (727) 72.4-8606 Mr. John Meyer August 10, 2000 Page 2 *A 100,000 S.F. officebuilding on 'Parcel 6 maybe eliminated via trade-off Mr. John. Meyer August 10, 2000 Page:3: TAr. John Meyer August 10, 2000 .'age 3 D. CAPACITY ANALYSIS 1 Tlic review agencies agreed that to avoid double counting project traffic, estimates of existing PM peak hour external primary trips will be done using ITE Trip Generation 6''' Edition. This existing project traffic will be subtracted from the total project traffic to.anive at unbuilt additional project traffic. Additional project traffic from unbuilt portions of the Park Place DRI will be, added to accumulated background traffic to identify the total 2003 I traffic volumes. It was agreed that the total 2003 traffic will be compared to the original ADA build-out (1991) traffic projections. Roadway segments where impact is greater than that previously analysed will be analyzed in detail on a directional basis to determine expected levels of service in 2003. It was agreed that any necessary roadway improvements would be compared to those in the Development Order and any new improvements above and beyond those already listed in the Development Order would be added. VI. CONCLUSION The applicants consultant agreed a report must be submitted within six months for this methodology to be valid and stated a report would be submitted as soon as possible. Appendices wi I I be numbered and include a table of contents. Also TBRPC requested a new Master Development Plan (Map H) be prepared and submitted with the NOPC application and traffic analysis. FDC agreed it would 1 prepare the new Map H. Ifyou agree this letter represents the discussions and agreements made at the August 9, 2000 meeting, please sign below and return to me. Sincerely, 1 Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP _ 6 ANj -AJ c Vice President/Transportation Printed Name AU Date- Aa :es 1 Encl. cc: Gary Jones, City of Clearwater Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO L,/ Kent Fast, FDOT Marina Pennington, DCA George Deakin, Kimley-Horn iyrt?-•'? '? ' Nicholas Sliacklcton, Park Place Land Tiro Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al. . File 172-07.500 ZO"d £VV9 S/-6 £18 6uLuuQLd L -4sLa LOQA d£i=b0 00-£Z-6nV Mr. John Meyer August 10, 2000 Page 3 D. CAPACITY ANALYSIS The review agencies agreed that to avoid double counting project traffic, estimates of existing PM peak hour external primary trips will be done using ITE Trip Generation, 6`h Edition. This existing project traffic will be subtracted from the total project traffic to arrive at unbuilt additional-project traffic. Additional project traffic from unbuilt portions of the Park Place DRI will be added to accumulated background traffic to identify the total 2003 ' traffic volumes. It was agreed that the total 2003 traffic will be compared to the original ADA build-out (1991) traffic projections. Roadway segments where impact is greater than that previously analyzed will be analyzed in detail on a directional basis to determine expected levels of service in 2003. It was agreed that any necessary roadway improvements would be compared to those in the Development Order and any new improvements above and beyond those already listed in the Development Order would be added. ' VI. CONCLUSION The applicants consultant agreed a report must be submitted within six months for this methodology to be valid and stated a report would be submitted as soon as possible. Appendices will be numbered and include a table.of contents. Also TBRPC requested a new Master Development Plan (Map H) 1 be prepared and submitted with the NOPC application and traffic analysis. FDC agreed it would prepare the new Map H. ' If you agree this letter represents the discussions and agreements made at the August 9, 2000 meeting, please sign below and return to me. Sincerely, O/ Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP 1 Vice President/Transportation :es L:Uneyer-S.wpd Encl. cc: Gary Jones, City of Clearwater Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO .Kent Fast, FDOT Manna Pennington, DCA George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Nicholas Shackleton, Park Place Land ' Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al. File 172-07.500 C24anice `3rOtt? 9/--?,- Date 23?ap j?r Role''" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P LORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. GINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS July 12, 2000 Mr. John Meyer, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, FL.33702 RE: Park Place DRI NOPC (DRI #92) Dear John- Enclosed are two (2) copies of the Transportation Methodology Report for the Park Place DRI - NOPC, We look forward to the methodology meeting-at your office on August 9, 2000 (9:30 A.M.). If you have any. . questions, please call me at (727) 724-8422. Sincerely, U? Rotiet C.ergolzzi,IC Vice President/Transportation :dc L-Vneyer-3.wpd Encl. cc: Gary Jones, City of Clearwater Kent Fast, FDOT Marina Pennington, DCA Ramon Solis, Pinellas County George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, et. al. Nicholas Shackleton, Park Place Land File 172-07.500 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA.33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8606 TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY REPORT FOR PARK PLACE DRI/NOPC I. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and east of ' U.S. 19. Park Place (DRI #92). was originally approved in 1983 to contain the following uses with an expected buildout date of 1991: r Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f. Office 1,103,000 s.f. Several NOPC analyses have modified the Development Order including modifications of land uses, extension ofbuildout and establishment of land use trade-offinechanisms. These modifications have extended the buildout to December 31, 2000 and approved the following uses: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f.* ' Office 795,520 s.f.* Light Industrial 200,000 s.f. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3 and 8 and office/hotel on Parcel 4. ' The Park Place DRI is almost fully built-out and most actual construction has been at densities well below approved levels. The applicant wishes to extend the buildout date to December 31, 2003, reduce the approved office entitlements on Parcel 6 to 100,000 s.f. and institute a trade-off to ' possibly put multi-family on Parcel 6 in lieu of office. A detailed traffic analysis will be prepared to evaluate whether this proposed change results in additional impacts. Specifically three (3) items will be evaluated. 1. Whether the proposed change results in a 15% increase in PM peak hour external trips generated by the project. 2. Whether the projected PM peak hour traffic volume in the revised buildout year (2003) are greater than those predicted in the original buildout year (1991). 3. Whether any projected increase results in unacceptable levels of service and necessary improvements above and beyond those included in the Development Order. Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions will be established by conducting PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts at several signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project. These will be supplemented by obtaining multi-day traffic counts on adjacent roadway segments. All traffic counts will be converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. Existing conditions will be analyzed using 1998 FDOT LOS Handbook procedures to include roadway specific traffic and signalization characteristics. Intersections will be analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capaci Manual (HCM) procedures as replicated by the HCS or Signal 97 software. III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS A list of roadway improvements programmed for construction within the first three (3) years of the MPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program will be included. A preliminary list, which is subject to change is shown below: PLANNED/PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Segment Improvement Construction Year Agency Drew Street (Highland - N.E. Coachman) Widen to 4LD 2000/01 FDOT #2570331 U.S. 19/Drew Street Interchange 2000/01 FDOT #2569571 U.S. 19 (S. of S.R. 590 - N. of Sunset Point) Interchange 2002/03 FDOT #2568881 Keene Road (Druid to Drew) Widen to 6LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Drew - Sunset Point) Construct 4LD 2000/01 Pinellas Cty. #920491 Keene Road (Sunset Point - Virginia) Widen to 4LD 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #920487 Drew/McMullen Booth Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #922361 S.R. 590/McMullen Booth Intersection Improvements 1999/00 Pinellas Cty. #922051 IV. BACKGROUND GROWTH Existing traffic on the roadway network will be adjusted to reflect background traffic in the revised buildout year. This will be done using screenline annual growth rates by comparing FSUTMS model projections for 1995 and 2010 along selected screenlines. Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 3 V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the revised project will be made using ITE Trip Generation, 6`h Edition. For the revised project a 15% internal capture will be applied as was approved in the 1996 NOPC. As was approved in all previous NOPC traffic analysis, a 2.5% transit capture will be applied for PSTA routes. Retail pass-by capture will be based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook and will not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. B. Trip Distribution Project traffic distribution will be based on the FSUTMS Regional Transportation Analysis model for the year 2005 and is shown in Figure 1. C. Study Area Delineation The project impact study area will include all roadway segments where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour maximum service flow rate of the segment. The study area will also include signalized intersections where project traffic comprises 4.5% or more of intersection capacity. D. Capacity Analysis Although the study area will be based on full DRI traffic, much of the DRI traffic is already on the roadway system and will be included in the traffic counts. To avoid double counting, the amount of external traffic from existing Park Place development will be calculated using ITE Trip Generation, 6"' Edition. The amount of external trips from the built portion will be deducted from existing traffic and only new (unbuilt) Park Place traffic will be added. This is the same procedure that was approved and used in the 1994 NOPC traffic analysis. Due to the interconnecting of parking areas with non-DRI businesses actual driveway counts should not be used to determine existing DRI traffic. New (unbuilt) traffic will be added to accumulate background traffic to estimate total expected traffic in the revised buildout year (2003). The projected volumes in the revised buildout year will be compared to those projected for the original buildout year (1991). Roadway segments where projected 2003 volume exceeds the originally approved volume will be analyzed in detail to determine PM peak hour LOS and improvements. This analysis will be done on a peak hour basis in accordance with FDOT 1998 LOS Handbook practices. r ENTERPRISE RD a/ - 27 0 0 1% I X? Li J J 2: 3% U SUNSET POINT RD. 4% f? - - MAIN ST w N? v Q _2/_ " N CR 590 Li J Z u ? J N? N t ' DREW ST. N 9% --* ti _31'/. _8% _7%_ z% ~ 1 CLEVELAND ST. f ST _13% \ 16/. 207. m _227 f? _ ?1 38% 201 6% 57 M H GULF TO m N X BA z, BLVD. ' DRUID RD. ti ' N NURSERY RD, 2/. ' BELLEAIR RD. _1%_ d f yHAINES BAYSH?RE Q 4 Li ' w = Z U w J W w Y 1% - - 1% 3% - - - - EAST BAY DR ROOSEVELT ? L N ' DESCRIPTION: PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PROJECT No. 172-07 ' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: 7/00 FIGURE: ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALIST S, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Cl Tel: (727)724-8422 - earwater FL, 33759 Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC r ENTERPRISE RD a/ - 27 0 0 1% I X? Li J J 2: 3% U SUNSET POINT RD. 4% f? - - MAIN ST w N? v Q _2/_ " N CR 590 Li J Z u ? J N? N t ' DREW ST. N 9% --* ti _31'/. _8% _7%_ z% ~ 1 CLEVELAND ST. f ST _13% \ 16/. 207. m _227 f? _ ?1 38% 201 6% 57 M H GULF TO m N X BA z, BLVD. ' DRUID RD. ti ' N NURSERY RD, 2/. ' BELLEAIR RD. _1%_ d f yHAINES BAYSH?RE Q 4 Li ' w = Z U w J W w Y 1% - - 1% 3% - - - - EAST BAY DR ROOSEVELT ? L N ' DESCRIPTION: PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PROJECT No. 172-07 ' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: 7/00 FIGURE: ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALIST S, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 1 2639 McCormick Dr. Cl Tel: (727)724-8422 - earwater FL, 33759 Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC 1 1 ENTERPRISE RD a a pa z ' w C D ? SUNSET POINT RD, ? MAIN ST 1 U ' B w Q LLJ J U DREW ST, CLEVELAND ST. I GULF TO BAY BLV . ' DRUID RD. C A ' NURSERY RD. S BELLEAIR RD. c q C=? W' W 1 W = z u W J W W EAST BAY DR 1 ' DESCRIPTION- CR 590 B S D C-A HAINES BAYSHORE d G? ROOSEVELT C L? PARK PLACE DRI SCREENLINE GROWTH RATES DATE: ' j FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 7/00 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 JJC 1 PROJECT No. 172-07 FIGURE: 11 1 1 1 C PARK PLACE (DRI NO. 92) CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 1996 February, 1997 PREPARED FOR: AMERICAN CYANAMID P. O. Box 5889 Lakeland, FL 33807-5889 PREPARED BY: KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 24945 U.S. 19 North Clearwater, FL 34623 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION .................................. 1 II. 'ANNUAL STATUS REPORT ........................... 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ....................................... 5-14 EXHIBIT A - CHANGES IN PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A-1 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) EXHIBIT B-1 - THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - OWNERSHIP MAP EXHIBIT E - NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS (PPDRI92.96) i r? [J I. U. (PPDRI92.96) INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983, amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), as further amended via Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91, 5722-95, and 6107-96) and Chapter 380.06(18) F.S. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning & Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 9/ 1 /95 to 9/ 1 /96 Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Location: Clearwater. Pinellas City County Developer: Name: American Cyanamid Company Name Address: One Cyanamid Plaza 07470 Street Location Wayne. NJ 07470 City, State, Zip Code 1. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. NOTE ANY ACTIONS (SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATIONS) TAKEN BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS THESE CHANGES. Changes in the proposed plan of development for the Park Place DRI are specifically discussed in Exhibit A. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE 1 DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Park Place was annexed by the City of Clearwater shortly after initial Development Order approval by Pinellas County. On October 20, 1983, the Development Order was amended and reissued for the project by the City of Clearwater. No other changes in local jurisdiction have occurred. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCRE- MENTAL SITE PLANS, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. The Amended Master Development Plan (Map H), contained as an exhibit to Ordinance No. 6107-96 (DRI Development Order Amendment), is the current proposed plan of development and is included with this report as Exhibit B. Also included as Exhibit B-1 is the approved Final Site Plan for "The Grand Reserve at Park Place" apartments. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVI- TY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR, AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. Please see Exhibit C of this report. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOP- MENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. During this reporting year, no tracts in the Park Place DRI have been sold to a separate entity or developer. Exhibit D reflects the current ownership in the Park Place DRI. u 1 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE, SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. (PPDRI92.96) 2 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, ' DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. ' See Exhibit F for a list of permit and approval information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER ' CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT, AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA, AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEE COMPLIED WITH DURING ' THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. ' Attached as Exhibit G. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED ' BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place ' Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: ' " a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted..... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report" ' The Grand Reserve at Park Place apartments received rezoning and Final Site Plan approval during this reporting year. Construction is expected to begin ' during the first quarter of 1997 with the project opening in late 1997 and construction completion occurring early in 1998. Also, construction of the remaining segment of Park Place Blvd. is expected to be completed during the ' 96/97 reporting year. To our knowledge, this is the only development activity expected in the forthcoming reporting year. and: "a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or ' Permits..... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report" At the present time, we have no specific knowledge of any development approvals or permits being sought during the next (1996/97) reporting year. and: (PPDR192."l 3 u 1 J "a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year" The conversion factor of permitting every 1,000 sf of office development to convert to 2.44 units was utilized during this reporting year. The. Grand Reserve at Park Place Final Site Plan lists the conversion as follows: Residential Multi-Family Allowable Uses Per Ordinance Requested For Area 5722-95 For Amended D.O. F Grand Reserve Parcel (Ac) (2) Units Residential Office Space Transferable Density Density (S.F.) Residential Units U.P.A. Units (U.P.A.) 2 (1) 9.84 171,400 157 16 156 15.9 3 14.85 258,700 238 16.1 234 15.8 (3) 8 6.84 124,860 115 16.8 - - Totals 31.53 544,960 510 16.2 - - (1) Parcel 2 gross area of 12.14 acres includes 2.30 acres of preservation zoned land which is not included in density calculations. Net area 12.14 - 2.30 Ac = 9.84 Acres. (2) Transferable residential units 16 based upon maximum of 510 units per ordinance 5722-95 and pro-rated based upon allowable office space per parcel. (3) Parcel 8 is owned by MDC Associates and is not a part of this application. Transferable residential units are provided for in Ordinance 5722-95. ' 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. ?I ?I I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs, and Southwest Florida Water Management District on March 18, 1997. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have been sent a copy of the report. Person completing the questionnaire: Richard K. Dutter, AI &P Title: Director of Planning King Engineering Associates, Inc. Representing: American Cyanamid (PPDR192.96) 4 III. EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A - CHANGES IN PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A-1 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) EXHIBIT B-1 - THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - OWNERSHIP MAP EXHIBIT E - NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS (PPDPJ92.96) 5 1 EXHIBIT A CHANGES IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT In April 1996, Storz Opthalmics applied for a rezoning on Parcels 2 and 3 of the Park Place DRI to allow for multi-family apartment development. The City of Clearwater approved the rezoning on June 6, 1996. Final Site Plans for "The Grand Reserve at Park Place" apartments were submitted and approved during this reporting year (see Exhibit B-1). On August 8, 1996, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Park Place DRI, filed a "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI" with the City of Clearwater, TBRPC, and DCA. Exhibit A-1 is a ' copy of the rendered, certified Development Order Amendment, deemed to be a non-substantial deviation and adopted by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, 1996. In summary, this amendment to the Development Order: 1. Amends Conceptual Plan. I2. Adds conversion factors to permit retail commercial and office uses to change to either office or hotel uses for Parcel 4 of the DRI. ' 3. Requires Parcel 4 to grant to City a pedestrian ingress/egress easement for sidewalk. 4. Allows curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access to Parcel 4. 6 EXHWIT A-1 ' CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 PROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT 1 1 (PPDRI92.96) 7 1 02/19/97 15: 09 $`4418617 JOHNSON-BLARLEF ' •1 ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE ' NO. 5142-91 AND ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE ' , A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT, PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR RETAIL ' COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; REFLECTING THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP AND CONFIGURATION OF THE PARCELS OF THE ' DEVELOPMENT; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER ' NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. ' WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order which ordinance constitutes a development order for Paris Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on ' Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development'); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance ' No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Omer and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and ' WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order, and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance ' No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order, and WHEREAS, on August 8 .", 1996, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRIJ pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the 'NOPC') with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPCI and the Florida Departrnent of Community Affairs (the "DCAJ; and 1 Ordinance No. 6107-96 ` -ZB-I`-97 WT? Q002 ' 02:19/97 15:10 '$`1418817 JOHNSO'r-BUKLEI _ ®003 1 WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a ' - land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflect changes in the ownership and ' configuration of the parcels of property within the Development (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and ' WHEREAS, the ownership of the Development is as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and ' WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and ' WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with amendments to the Development Order, are previous presumed Statutes;tandreate asubstantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380-06(l 9). Florida ' WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviatioas been butteda and ' WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized government and ' empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and ' WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and ' WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. ' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ' ile?ifln 1 Introd icti+•+ -This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. ' Section Findings _ The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact ' A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, and No. 5722- 95, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 2 ' Ordinance No. 6107-96 02/19%91 15:10 '$4418617 JOHNSON-BLAXLET Q004 1 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B• Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 4 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order. 1• Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 for the conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development; and 2. Reflecting changes in the ownership and configuration of the parcels of property within the Development; and 3• Modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval h ("ADA final '). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. findings of -The City Commission, having made the above fact, reaches the following condusions of law: A• The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H. Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "C," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. 3 Ordinance No. 81 o7-96 . H-19-97 W9J 3::0 °M _ ' ?I 11 1 02:19/97 15:11 V4418617 JOHNSON-BUKLEY Q005 C- The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D- The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or mod' the rights originally approved by Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 63.3 67 8e Florida Statutes, except to the extent that are limited or modified by the Proposed Chan??c rights and protections are approved by this ordinance. 9w to the Development Order as F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to detemtinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the. Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as ' described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and ' interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. ' - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: ' A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4A and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set ' forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan ached hereto as Exhibit "C.- 4 Ordinance No. 6107-96 71. ' . -B- I H7 WE-1 PM 02,119/97 15:11 '04418617 JOHNSON-BL RLET 1006 B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4.C. The Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,145,520 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795,520 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factor set forth in Subsection 4AA. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. C. Subsection 4.AA of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit (0 1,000 square feet of retail commercial development to convert to either (x) 2,875 square feet of office development or (y) 11.96 hotel rooms and/or (iii) 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 4.16 hotel rooms are hereby established for the retail commercial area shown as Parcel 4 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: 'sag feet or Boor area "rooms Thirty (30) days prior to issuance of any permit which utilizes the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notice, from the Developer, of the proposed use of the conversion ratio. 5 Ordinance No. 6107-96 .H-H-97 Vl71) -:::2 PM •.?:8 :; . C Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel4 shall be limited as follows: 1 02:19%97 15:12 V4418617 JOHNSON-BLIRLET Q00-' D. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.E.E.. E.E. Prior to the issuance of any development permit for any portion of ' Parcel 4, the owner of Parcel 4 shall grant to the City a perpetual non-exclusive easement for pedestrian ingress and egress and construction and maintenance of a sidewalk t th ' ' a e City s cost, Such easement shall be ten feet (10') in width along the southerly boundary of Parcel 4 and shall extend from the westerly boundary of Parcel 4 to the easterly boundary of parcel 4 ("Sidewalk Easement") . The City agrees that the Sidewalk Easement may be located within any setback areas on Parcel 4 and shall not have the effect of enlargin an P l ' g y arce 4 setbacks or otherwise reducing the development rights for Parcel 4. E. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection ' 4.F.F.; F.F. The owner of Parcel 4 shall be entitled to curb cuts for the purpose ' of access to and from Parcel 4 and Park Place Boulevard. F. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments do , not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. G. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are ' limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. H. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. ' 1. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. ' J. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section ' 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5 Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. 6 Ordinance No. 6107.96 02/19/97 15: 13 'x'4418817 JOHNSON-BLAKLEY ®008 _ PASSED ON FIRST READING November 7, 1996 ' PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED November 21, 1996 t I Rita Garvey t ? Mayor - Commissioner Attest UYntMa E. Goudeau City Clerk o form and legal sufficiency: ri4n PamCity Attomey 7 F-19-97 W71 - :3 PM 4413617 Ordnance No. 6107-96 t a ? 02.19/97 11:13 V4418617 JOHNSON-BLARLET Q009 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING, ' thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01' W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00"13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04' E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00"52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89"54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 "04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 "56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E. 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20"51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89"54'49' E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest comer of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00"22'28' E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest comer of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11' E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 114 to a point on the West right-of-way. line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00"19'21' E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of--way line; thence S 89°46'01' W. 627.00 feet; thence S 00'10'21' E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. Ordinanoe No. 6107-96 m IMP m IM 0 0 12 Notice-of ftmos2g Chanao A?II??M PARK PLACE OWNERS N.Q. Parcel 1.D. No. 17-29-16-855464004)010 2 17.29-1 0 0 3 1? 29-1 4 17-29-16400000-230-0130 a 5 17 29-16-00000-240.OM ao 0 owner St= OPhthalmics. Inc, 21 Park Ptaa Blvd. N. CloWWater, FL 34619 Sborz Ophthaimics, Inm 21 Park Pleas Blvd N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophth Mes, Ina 21 Park Pleas Blvd. N. Clearwater. FL 34619 Park Plea Land, Ltd. do Clinton International Penthouse Suite 2121 Parma de Leon Blvd. Coal Gables. FL 33134 Park Plans Building. LW. do Real Estate Tax Service 201 E. Kennedy Blvd.. Suite 700 Twygm FL 33602 Page 1 of 4 ? .v G n: ro r-. m U) 1 hl 1.. I 0 No- 1! ill-C) 17-29-16.f6373,000-MM ` Clara InG I R 0. ft 916464 Longwood. FL 32791.6464 (114D) 17-29-16-663734W-004C) Clang Ina P.O. Boot 916464 Longwood. FL 327A1.6484 ?I (! 1-E) t7-29-16?66373.ppp,p0S0 Clark Inc. P.O. Boot 918464 Longwood. FL 327914464 z Ed 0 m .o v v v a a? o IPSO a of 4 . 1 r- CG Rl -w .`a A" `? 3 rn u? , w I 0 No- 1! ill-C) 17-29-16.f6373,000-MM ` Clara InG I R 0. ft 916464 Longwood. FL 32791.6464 (114D) 17-29-16-663734W-004C) Clang Ina P.O. Boot 916464 Longwood. FL 327A1.6484 ?I (! 1-E) t7-29-16?66373.ppp,p0S0 Clark Inc. P.O. Boot 918464 Longwood. FL 327914464 z Ed 0 m .o v v v a a? o IPSO a of 4 . 1 r- CG Rl -w .`a A" `? 3 rn u? , w ' 02/19/97 15:15 '04418617 1 1 1 l- r? 1 'AN L-CM GO PARCEL 8 + Q PARCEL 4 e PARCEL 2 M? r1V f PARCEL 7 PARCEL '6 O 1 r PARCELS P Rt r rILL1 • ? 10l 1 IMT. ? f ; ? 1 n r of A .r .w r• V ? d ? ?V O v f .'a .4 14 f 1 L L! 112 t II 3 1 i / JOHNSON-BLAKLEY Q013 PARCEL, 3 ..K: -•?:'ll J?i?t? 1 EXHIBIT B I APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAC H) u (PPDR192.%) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DREW STREET PARCEL 3 PARCEL I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) OFFICE 258,700 SF • APPROVED FOR 234 MULTIFAMILY UNITS PURSUANT TO CONVERSION FACTOR IN SUBSECTION 4 AA OF THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT - ORDER(ORDINANCE / 5722.95) e° (ACCESS a ¢ `y, %o. ?i S L i? OFFICE PARCEL4 124,860 SF PARCEL 8 COMMERCIAL • POSSIBLE CONVERSION TO OFFICE ! HOTEL COMN?ERCIAL (RETAIL). 125,000 SF (55,278 SF EXISTIN II 4q PARCEL 7 PARCEL2_jl COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 NATURAL . AREA PARCEL 2 p OFFIC V 171,400 SF ' APPROVED FOR 156 MULTIFAMILY UNITS PURSUANT TO CONVERSION FACTOR IN SUBSECTION 4 AA 0 THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE.# 57229 / G4Q P Qv OFFICE OFFICE (120,000 SF PLANNED) (120,560 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 6 OFFIC PARCEL 5 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 EXISTING ACCESS 0 0 0 f a ACCESS 0 150 300 LAND USE SCHEDULE LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL 55,278 SF 94,722 SF 150,000 SF OFFICE 120,560 SF 674,960 SF 795,520 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF TOTAL 275,838 SF 869,682 SF 1J45,520 SF NOTES; 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT". THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 2000. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, OR 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, OR 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 1.54 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED. 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2,3, 8 8. 5. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 2,875 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OR 1,000 SF OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.TO 11.96 ROOMS OF HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 4.16 ROOMS OF HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 4. GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL 25,000 SF (RETAIL) (16,837 SF EXISTING) . KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES,, /NC, MAP H Planners, Engineers; Surveyors PARK PLACE DRI - REVISED MASTER: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISED: AA4E 26. 1996 1 1 1 MATER STORAGE FACILITY S89'54'49'W .b? ._«. .r ,.. 50.00' %CUL19^L AREA PAOPliD S' N CNAN LINK FUICE VACANT ^ry y! ATE ®- ea E9, NBPU sq ?• lCAVA10 AAG ,'? /- S ' C00[ l ? '•A A, t?Y .r 00 ,f elBf - art '» ( 'ON-9R t fi ? NI .I A,•A PRAA1PF6N5 NIW?AY rq ^^ Al A Id DA ;a J iii • •,? v f- 3 ? I :_, " -•Y 1 b 'T 8 3• p•RCPOSFD 3 STORY •,?12A ?D? N L $f , U f?q ORlM•10 ?_ SHOPPING CENTER o® 25 so Im PNSPOMD sarPAA ro mrotfai ro oallw acrrMO mlml rINMN1D Lm I SCALE: 1• . 50'"II ' L-moswE NPFEN CITY OF CLEARWATER VACANT III Z A a. ._. - II 112E11,33- o•f ' P L. \? J auvM - .? I III e??.;3• :Y ' $Tt1GgMAT?t'JF. ?`« '' i min d'. 13' CELOfT4 caa3 j III WE ,?., I X71 a? ?Bv I , 4. ?r µf??Y - 2 y ?Y?1 I¢?jY 1„I?) y? 4M1 §ZI M I ? ?1 1v ' w . v ?+'' -- = ,r 500'03 <9 VN- ? 21 ( =ANNO & 2T W&alcll P0• ' '? {.c Mt ?< 6 PEM]I1NN1 arz sDLtuA Cd1EDTION 1 ROO ' -1 A '. , :.,.h ?F, BM8 9FLIG axworoanuDOwAC AENW6LY PFHATED ci >T";, 9. - FT? ? ` ?S?ACfS _ I. ? g1 ? ° ? , / Pmrsrow cArz . pF 3 , AYj,, o° mewrz mntcna ?. s . lip • o lO BEwAUpGwD sP® 1wAO Sr •' l ?? PAIAN I \ / 22 E oa"0P°°smPC° a'r Ymuws AG w NMA16Yg1 PMOn,B BETKM COLWS N? . I --... .mss '•'` r SEE MAX I I l'. ,. I 7 ?.. f CV 1I I s i ` J `\\ •. ITT R n.mt^axban II II I I i? II 8 1Y II it II II I JIIII?-L?-?? II i II II II _sN? -S44'56'11'E 35.36' FAIRWOOD M AVENUE III III III III III I it TREE LEGEND SYMBOL 000wim Fj BAY CHINA sow OwBq 8 X" Ed MwU w 06R PXM f' PIE MOMr Tie T ALUM. POST EYBEDOED BO' (MIN.) NIBN ALM" GArE INTO B" w x IT' o COXG9ETE W1 PICAET9 B A' O.C. I I ' r V0?0RE0 FOOTING B x0' OC ^ I J I ( I I i i L - J FUNRE DECORATIVE FENCE I T aulDl"° EXISTING LO 11 ? BUILDING STOR2 OPHTNALNICS, INC. = C 01 'f CURVE DATA p. S TI- UN-C TANCFM uWONO CI 510. J6v IEE!• k. C2 .9000 3®w 1nB.w 586.29 C3 186. 29L91 160.89 18021 BFAPoNO DELTA SEPIA A: ORSN 51 !11806 1 500'X1 N • 76 T I PARK PLACE - ^ KING ENG/NE IRWO ASSOCIATES MC " ' 01-°°° ,;. " , . THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE FINAL SITE PLAN A 2-A•-97 NUN A CTOft REVISED WATER ? ? ::t 2w p? Engineers - Planners - Surveyors - Scientists - landscape Architects FOR AMERICAN PROPERTIES DE 5 0-15- RI CK OUT OF X UTI MOVED BRICIf COLUMN OUT EX UnL1TY ESMT » 10 w.A :U16 va. e x 66P N.° x..,wP L LOT 3 1 9-20-95 REV. PER. °Re COMMENTS' a ADDED PARKING LDT . ?? ?.••?. ti ? 09 ? Na ,? d LECE89E DEVELOPMENT NT CORPORATION 4--0-99 ? PER CITY ? SITE PLUI RENEW _10_96 Ia0) TxN6u ? r.nA F FL > . h6 P.r Ne•. it 5wm leol maI (nl eu.o6a . '=50' 9 ?7 JJG <eatk o rASUN I i J APARTMENTS reoro? uar ruw,a n lux sn annrs arts I M. _ K d 1 SIeP SAID LNO71 . gaa as M. N00'22'28'E " sn ? , .13. e? , ?r . . .. D u ?IfD1T' ® ? IE7NNq H' • 000MA1M FOWTAM N PROPOSED a ? STOAIIMATER MANAGEMENT x 7w100 . S?.s,a anAa 1 1 1 MATER STORAGE FACILITY S89'54'49'W .b? ._«. .r ,.. 50.00' %CUL19^L AREA PAOPliD S' N CNAN LINK FUICE VACANT ^ry y! ATE ®- ea E9, NBPU sq ?• lCAVA10 AAG ,'? /- S ' C00[ l ? '•A A, t?Y .r 00 ,f elBf - art '» ( 'ON-9R t fi ? NI .I A,•A PRAA1PF6N5 NIW?AY rq ^^ Al A Id DA ;a J iii • •,? v f- 3 ? I :_, " -•Y 1 b 'T 8 3• p•RCPOSFD 3 STORY •,?12A ?D? N L $f , U f?q ORlM•10 ?_ SHOPPING CENTER o® 25 so Im PNSPOMD sarPAA ro mrotfai ro oallw acrrMO mlml rINMN1D Lm I SCALE: 1• . 50'"II ' L-moswE NPFEN CITY OF CLEARWATER VACANT III Z A a. ._. - II 112E11,33- o•f ' P L. \? J auvM - .? I III e??.;3• :Y ' $Tt1GgMAT?t'JF. ?`« '' i min d'. 13' CELOfT4 caa3 j III WE ,?., I X71 a? ?Bv I , 4. ?r µf??Y - 2 y ?Y?1 I¢?jY 1„I?) y? 4M1 §ZI M I ? ?1 1v ' w . v ?+'' -- = ,r 500'03 <9 VN- ? 21 ( =ANNO & 2T W&alcll P0• ' '? {.c Mt ?< 6 PEM]I1NN1 arz sDLtuA Cd1EDTION 1 ROO ' -1 A '. , :.,.h ?F, BM8 9FLIG axworoanuDOwAC AENW6LY PFHATED ci >T";, 9. - FT? ? ` ?S?ACfS _ I. ? g1 ? ° ? , / Pmrsrow cArz . pF 3 , AYj,, o° mewrz mntcna ?. s . lip • o lO BEwAUpGwD sP® 1wAO Sr •' l ?? PAIAN I \ / 22 E oa"0P°°smPC° a'r Ymuws AG w NMA16Yg1 PMOn,B BETKM COLWS N? . I --... .mss '•'` r SEE MAX I I l'. ,. I 7 ?.. f CV 1I I s i ` J `\\ •. ITT R n.mt^axban II II I I i? II 8 1Y II it II II I JIIII?-L?-?? II i II II II _sN? -S44'56'11'E 35.36' FAIRWOOD M AVENUE III III III III III I it TREE LEGEND SYMBOL 000wim Fj BAY CHINA sow OwBq 8 X" Ed MwU w 06R PXM f' PIE MOMr Tie T ALUM. POST EYBEDOED BO' (MIN.) NIBN ALM" GArE INTO B" w x IT' o COXG9ETE W1 PICAET9 B A' O.C. I I ' r V0?0RE0 FOOTING B x0' OC ^ I J I ( I I i i L - J FUNRE DECORATIVE FENCE I T aulDl"° EXISTING LO 11 ? BUILDING STOR2 OPHTNALNICS, INC. = C 01 'f CURVE DATA p. S TI- UN-C TANCFM uWONO CI 510. J6v IEE!• k. C2 .9000 3®w 1nB.w 586.29 C3 186. 29L91 160.89 18021 BFAPoNO DELTA SEPIA A: ORSN 51 !11806 1 500'X1 N • 76 T I PARK PLACE - ^ KING ENG/NE IRWO ASSOCIATES MC " ' 01-°°° ,;. " , . THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE FINAL SITE PLAN A 2-A•-97 NUN A CTOft REVISED WATER ? ? ::t 2w p? Engineers - Planners - Surveyors - Scientists - landscape Architects FOR AMERICAN PROPERTIES DE 5 0-15- RI CK OUT OF X UTI MOVED BRICIf COLUMN OUT EX UnL1TY ESMT » 10 w.A :U16 va. e x 66P N.° x..,wP L LOT 3 1 9-20-95 REV. PER. °Re COMMENTS' a ADDED PARKING LDT . ?? ?.••?. ti ? 09 ? Na ,? d LECE89E DEVELOPMENT NT CORPORATION 4--0-99 ? PER CITY ? SITE PLUI RENEW _10_96 Ia0) TxN6u ? r.nA F FL > . h6 P.r Ne•. it 5wm leol maI (nl eu.o6a . '=50' 9 ?7 JJG <eatk o rASUN I i J APARTMENTS reoro? uar ruw,a n lux sn annrs arts I M. _ K d 1 SIeP SAID LNO71 . gaa as M. N00'22'28'E " sn ? , .13. e? , ?r . . .. D u ?IfD1T' ® ? IE7NNq H' • 000MA1M FOWTAM N PROPOSED a ? STOAIIMATER MANAGEMENT x 7w100 . S?.s,a anAa 1 C 7 LEGEND TREE LEGEND s-°E STORY SEWER INLET ..,_. SYMBOL °Dd7tlN ORICK PAVER WENA. P CURVE DATA CURVE RADW LEN6TN SEARING I DELTA ....,.,?,, ?CLL£E BAY YT9 C, 13.49' 11305 WE 5rSANTARY SEWER MANHOLE CHNA BEAN' PA! 1ELA C 00 97.4r 4 9 ro3-E 4914' EX e' W WATER NAIN - -`rw _T.0_-. ? S a[TD ?Py2? ?/..?• 2so LEn TLRN WA FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (FDq ?-A FOC J MTBTLA EH .±D OAK 'D FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA) NILY 4' CONC. S"WALN AND F? , FN, Y f,y •? TOP OF BANK (TOR) rye -•- ?? UPOMOWN { PRW04Epr W [xTEW7e LOT 1 - ALOE JURISDICTION KNITS WA \ hr BIACNG uTBACA ^ Z (APPROMIMATE) i? ) I PARK 1 w? wrap W0. BUILDING NUMBER N IP*OPOSED C?XttA0W1 UM 1[MCE / /S , BE 9N;cT TO A 9E99MAtt r(jrT. 0 2A WA NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES ®I F ?? iii \ \\\ IN / 90 00 INALOW `7f ABK SCALE r = 50' WA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING ' /4. Bpr ?\ e, ?ke\`\\ N yN ryil wM?L / / \ xE nrt q WA CONCRETE =i / T { Ex r SAx. STOP MII S Ar 29r LEFT TLa1 LAK WA WETLAND FILL AREA J EX. _ An YS^/ SAN 40(SWI PLUG) CONE ]Z74 w cauBBM 11.40 INE OI IM E .,' e, ?? 'T0 q,. WRN LLIYW 1[TMEEM ?? / r 9 '? ?,•, ?'? H# A• ytf? '- &'.r. a?' ?? ?,". ? ?Tm 4 taNNEtt To Ex r W EXISTING 6 STORY rKVOM r W a7oaoN / OFFICE BUILD?/? 9.y: 9- 7, Of 4 scxeNLrAu 000, a, _ 0 • we '` ` O ?/ / \"73 e?, ;s 9 •. y.• .K,' (. ? '? ? Bm Mwr (y \ - ??,,. ? ? Tpt /M , poi °M,? Ex. r SAN. Ex: sAx ! a - , <k .? ? `.. p-Yr ` V / ?((?? .....y..?.. • ?"^? I. RN . 27s?(e? - x x r1 .? .` T r { ` - 1 10 r 4aw. suwAL4 , / I.F.: nsWPLUE) ' X '{ t { e"k s <"?" ?" I Mo2uAx eL f 010 VACANT iErura r9u n i I R _ 110' LANDSCAPE ,\, 83`? aonP °1 10 MA a.ar FOE IFA%EMENT ARM Vu J: PREYpO9LY PFAYTTEO ??/'. ?•?? - * YffiI a W 4 .,r rAT-4 ?a+Gr,::+el.- nc eawTAUCnoB EX. wETLI TO BE F11E0 0.70 40. W c„?.'ST ' - ??- BOLO MABR f0 NP r HT CMANCx LMI FENCE ?{ r e ,,.1 ! ACTa LOClTFO 'wFli C ..: ? ? a ?S L` J rKFa O erLaroi'-BrtSSLE ? YS 11 sTnr. vaaPOSm 9 rnxtcTOw WN x Bp9 /? aF ar.F a *04'59"E aEa vuvs9 T». (p?di/k'e m 23' j J J 4°38'34'E r \ ' 4 ado,??? S f 4gjdq f/ B - -- .06' w. } o // yp`?"v- 0 qq 1VG p . y\ a»;rT;. <,; c v :?; j r A ?' 0 d ?? r"'? i AOOITI01111 TA'RMN a o tt VACANT ?y / « QQg ,,.? /? FROrAm 900 f/ J D L s f `'\ COCONCR m C) ,vf l A RmucTpw N wT:'TLAw ' d I ^r ^ A"? PROPOSED l voct MA OEK 0P.. c + / MiFA 70o u. x ;- r STORWATER \ r ?4 4P v oac TANONG w iTI 575°3 LS E---J MATa Ex. IAYENEKf z AMMGE ENT \ A r ' Qo0 j 4I ?82' o W 1?" w FACILITY 400 ?Q _ .OCATION ('' a ^? '/h I vaOPOTMY?E'Nwc a N• MaOW 9n4Atx S30O s \°?° OP \ " ??", PROrceEA xcoRATNE FENCE > .mr- " y r J ': J .2, G g'^ 0 0 !,. i rrT wwn ecTwce? cairs ( N72`25' 38 E f =n C v u tTr. Sd QO 4Pe '? MATL TORE VLU oa+ u. I W 4I .99' I _ I C r coMC mErALx .q QO6 IL t DOWN nc wAr m ` /? Q,b* i j'? N _ d / : - 'T • ME r Ex. N h f , Nq' IFFT TLMB LANE OP B ' 1 ?'1 N?+ I 0 r TACTLE WAM4M 9TR S ha r______- h VACANT eFLVM, aAIB v. : i } ! - y 1 _1 p a•LAwscAEE MrEU - pRQp®ge0 EASELeNT S59°39' 3 S?VATICN AND DRAINAGE E 'NATURAL ARIZA_ e' 4LAABM SETBACK 2.30 A L L?l--! a EAGttxj.T,y"30C 1 DECORATIVE FOUW- IN (EXISTING) i r c9NE 94Ewux N I (MST AEZENT IONf' PROPOSED 9' H CKM LINK GATE [• _ \ TSESNAfT. ROADAT CONC. w4A N I p I I _; / Tt I 1 /\ ISLAND TTOOB B?WTED B \ -. - L { 1 V STRUCTURE VE PROPOSED OUT ALL \ ?+e > '7,p. 9 r W ExTENSIa ? ?+/ I ?. \ y\ \l \\\\ ( /ry ` \\ ANT ` J UJ \\ ?`? IC \\ \ J* / `\ 4CONCAEfE rALx 3 :k ' / / / OD. `1 \ \ \\ 4 / \ ati_ ... F' ?`... \, ?? IOW \ r \\ l^ N v N uw c -A+ . ` W 4 `pm DO j z 1 _ >un? SOO° 21E, 564 52' a - --- - - - - ------------------ <% _ HAWT0N ROAD (CA. 144) ?.. - - -_ - - - - (DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER) RWA IN ,NeTCCeoE KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE 1160-0G1.00. JLWlCAO Engineers • Planners - Surveyors • Scientists • Landscape Architects FOR FINAL SITE PLAN 4 2-^-97 REV, WATER SYSTEM PER CITY REVIEW a DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES LET 2 3 !046-96 ADDED T" LANE AT STA. 20.50 PP BLVD. Q RwA H9.B V.A 4 N. sw w.w xr°.e, 9.A ANN w..°- A... 2 9.20-96 REV. PEA. DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW. (ml•nuw s r-1 . p??,? M? B 3 lECE99E DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4-30-96 REV. PEA OTC PREL. SITE PLAN REVIEW JJ6 1N31 0-4 • I"=56' A 1 l y i m 1 - i 1 Q '. t?ta.L .wu ;? ? ?. ? PARCH 6 • . ? rajs A* "" ' PAS 7- C3 PARCH 5 - 9 3 m , r t s .ca W a+.s 1 t_ _.?.J J CL. Z L .. G A - a D E ? ro BAY s ? ? J W ? W W W J W U J W s U Q U U a cr a U cc a = a °- ¢ a a a a € EXHIBIT D j OWNERSHIP MAP 1 l y i m 1 - i 1 Q '. t?ta.L .wu ;? ? ?. ? PARCH 6 • . ? rajs A* "" ' PAS 7- C3 PARCH 5 - 9 3 m , r t s .ca W a+.s 1 t_ _.?.J J CL. Z L .. G A - a D E ? ro BAY s ? ? J W ? W W W J W U J W s U Q U U a cr a U cc a = a °- ¢ a a a a € EXHIBIT D j OWNERSHIP MAP m m m mm m m m m = = M -M mm m m = m EXHIBIT D PARK PLACE DRI OWNERS Pout I.D. No. 1 17-29464L5546-0(X}4)010 2 17.28-1 3 17-20464554640)4= 4 17 29-16.00000-230•x130 5 17.29-16400000-240.0600 ownw Sim OpWalmics. Ina 21 Park Pros Blvd. N. Cleerwetw, FL 34819 8torz Ophtheimias, I= 21 Park Plans Blvd N. Cleorwatw, FL 34819 Stors Ophthelrnlcs, ina Z1 Pant Pros Blvd. N. Ct"nmdw, FL 34819 Perk Plow Land, Ltd. No CILdon International Penthouse 8ulte 2121 Ponce do Low Blvd. Corti Goblee. FL 33134 Park PJaos SWtdkVo Ltd. c% Real EsM* Tax Service 201 E. Kannedy Blvd., Butte 700 TwnM FL 33602 f EXHIBIT D R2 Pemst 11 (! t-C) 1749-184073.000.00M (1143) 17-29-16.66373.000.,0040 V 14E) 17-29-16-M-13400-OM aasaa 4a Clark, Ua P. 0. am 916464 Longwood. FL 327916464 Clank Ina P.O. Boot 916464 Lonpw004 FL 32791.6484 Cla*, Inc. P.O. Bops 918464 Longwood. FL 32799.8464 EXHIBIT D R2 Pemst 11 (! t-C) 1749-184073.000.00M (1143) 17-29-16.66373.000.,0040 V 14E) 17-29-16-M-13400-OM aasaa 4a Clark, Ua P. 0. am 916464 Longwood. FL 327916464 Clank Ina P.O. Boot 916464 Lonpw004 FL 32791.6484 Cla*, Inc. P.O. Bops 918464 Longwood. FL 32799.8464 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT F PERMIT INFORMATION List of Development Approvals and Permits [For Reporting Year Ending 9/1/961 Approval/Permit Aaencv Submittal Dates Action Rezoning City of Clearwater 4/11/96 Approved 6/06/96 Final Plan City of Clearwater 4/10/96 Approved 10/25/96 NOPC City of Clearwater 8/08/96 Approved 11/21/96 Osprey Nest Relocation FGFWFC 8/29/96 Approved 9/19/96 (PPDR192.96) 11 EXHIBIT G ' COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments, as contained in the Park Place Development ' Order (amended 11/21/96) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS COMPLIANCE SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and Final Site Plans submit-ted All development activity must receive the for each phase and consistent with the DRI appropriate City approval consistent with the "Conceptual Plan". "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved via Ordinance No. 6107-96. AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the Developer has complied. conversation factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. B. All development shall be consistent with applicable land development codes. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicat- ed to the City of Clearwater. BB. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. con- structed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 SF (795,520 SF office use - 150,000 SF retail - 200,000 SF industrial) subject to conver- sion factors. CC. Mass transit requirements. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to the first Final Site Plan approval after 1 / 19/95 . (PPDR192.96) 12 All development activity is reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater at time of plan approval. Developer has complied. No action required during reporting year. Conversion factor utilized to allow 390 multi- family units. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. (Bus stop on Park Place Blvd. is proposed as part of apartment project.) Access previously acquired. All Developer commitments have been met. 1 11 L CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS COMPLIANCE EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City 10' easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. No action required during reporting year. F. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. No Developer action required. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting period. I. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and mainte- nance thereof. Developer has continued to assure on-going maintenance. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the project drainage system. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. 0. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. (Approved apartment Site Plan maintains aquatic lands.) Developer has continued to assure on-going safe disposal of run-off. SWFWMD has issued permits for all land devel- opment activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as needed. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. Proposed development complies by connecting Hampton Road to Park Place Blvd. to existing Drew Street and U.S. 19 shopping with sidewalks. (PPDRI92.%) 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS COMPLIANCE R. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. S. T. U V. W. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. X. Maintenance of on-site wells. Y. Z. City requirement to provide certain services (a City commitment, N/A). Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. Proposed development permitted relocation of nest. Developer has complied; a capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. No action required during the reporting period. The City and/or County will provide services as required. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvements in accordance with applicable revised Development Order conditions. ' (PPDRl92.%) 14 EXHIBIT „E„ PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O..CHANGE AND DATE Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space N/A NIA NIA # Spectators # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) NIA NIA NIA Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Hospitals # Beds NIA NIA NIA # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) No change -0- 200,000 SF GFA (12/19/91- Ord. #5142-91) # Employees Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage mined (year) N/A N/A N/A Water Withdrawal (Gal/day) Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross sq. ft.) 404,639 SF GFA 1,103,000 SF GFA 803,000 SF GFA (12/19/91 -Ord. #5142-91) ' # Parking Spaces 795,520 SF GFA (1/19/95-Ord. #5722-95) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations ' 159,840 square feet of Office was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units pursuant to conversion allowed by Ord. #5722-95. After conversion, Office = 635,680 SF GFA. -2- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA NIA NIA Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) Type of dwelling units office development on Multi-family # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) 81,120 SF GFA 150,000 SF GFA None # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations Proposed amendment will allow -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Hotel/Motel # Rental Units office development on factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) additional parcel (Parcel 6) to development to convert to hotel. # Parking Spaces be converted to hotel # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, N/A NIA N/A easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations -4- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O..CHANGE AND DATE Open Space Acreage No change proposed (All natural and Site locational changes vegetated non Type of open space impervious surfaces)(Z) D.O. conditions ADA representations Preservation, Buffer or Acreage No change proposed Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 1011110011:23 AM d-1 37413.95209 #223881 v1 - Park Place DRI/Sub Dev Cht 2000 -5- PARK PLACE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 1999 September 1999 PREPARED FOR: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 PREPARED BY: -Tor ae X921 1'?emoriai Highway -One %1,w Trial Center, Suite 300 [,,fvp:: H,)rida 33634 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT ...................................... 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H EXHIBIT B-1 - U.S. 19 PARCEL, FINAL SITE PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - PARK PLACE OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - N/A EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS 1 ' I. INTRODUCTION t This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of ' Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via DRI Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91, 5722-95 ' and 6107-96) and Chapter 380.06 (18) F.S., and in conformance with Form RPM-BSP Annual Report-1. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Council (TBRC), the Southwest Florida ' Water Management District (SWFWMD) and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). ' II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 9/1/98 to 9/1/99 Month/DayNear Month/DayNear Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Name of DRI Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer - Name: BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL Company Name Address: 21 Park Place Boulevard North Street Location Clearwater. FL 34606 City, State, Zip Code 1. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. EXHIBIT A SHOULD ALSO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS IF APPLICABLE: A. DESCRIBE CHANGES IN THE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR PHASING FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AND FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS; B. STATE ANY KNOWN INCREMENTAL DRI APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OR REQUESTS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION THAT WERE FILED IN THE REPORTING YEAR AND TO BE FILED DURING THE NEXT YEAR; C. ATTACH A COPY OF ANY NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER OR THE SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF AN ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT WAS RECORDED BY THE DEVELOPER PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 380.06 (15) (F), F.S. No changes occurred to the currently approved plan of development during this reporting year and none are anticipated during the next year. EXHIBIT A of this report contains a summary of Development Order changes for the project. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING ' LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING ' LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ' No change in local jurisdiction occurred during this reporting year. ' 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN ETC NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED , ., . The Amended Master Development Plan (MAP H) included in this report as EXHIBIT B is the currently approved Master Plan for the Park Place DRI. Exhibit B-1 includes the site plan for the U.S. 19 parcel (Parcel 8). 1 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ' PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. Please see EXHIBIT C of this report. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS ' INVOLVED. To the best of our knowledge, no undeveloped tracts of land in the development ' have been sold to a separate entity or developer. ' 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE ' SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been ' purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. Please see EXHIBIT F, PERMIT INFORMATION, for a summary list of permit and ' approval information. ' 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR ' COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. A list summarizing each Development Order condition and the developer's compliance with each condition is attached as EXHIBIT G, COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. ' 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place 1 Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: ' a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report. ' To the best of our knowledge, construction will continue on the 1,600 sf cafeteria expansion on Parcel 1. and the 82,000 sf office building on Parcel ' 8. An 85,000sf office building is planned for Parcel 6, however, no agreements have been reached as of this writing. Other than that, we have ' no specific knowledge of additional plans being prepared or which may be submitted during the forthcoming reporting year for the remaining undeveloped portion of the DRI, Parcel 6. ' and: ' a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits .... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report. 1 F1 Construction plans, a Department of Environmental Protection wastewater collection/transmission system permit, and a Florida Department of Transportation Driveway Connection Permit have been issued for the 82,000 sf office building. Construction on this parcel has not begun, however, additional building permit requests for this building can be expected during the upcoming year if construction is commenced. and: a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year. No trade-off mechanisms were used by Park Place developers during this reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Council, the State Department of Community Affairs and the Southwest Florida Water Management District on September 29, 1999. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have been sent a copy of this report. Person completing the questionnair A• Robert A. Rutled a ICP Title: Transportation Project Manager King Engineering Associates, Inc. Representing: Bausch & Lomb Surgical 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III. EXHIBITS Exhibit A - Summary of Development Order Changes Exhibit B - Revised Map H, Master Development Plan Exhibit B-1 - U.S. 19 Parcel Site Plan (Parcel 8) Exhibit C - Summary of Development Activity Exhibit D - Park Place DRI Ownership Exhibit E - N/A Exhibit F - Permit Information Exhibit G - Compliance With Development Order Conditions 1 EXHIBIT A Summary of Development Order Changes 11 1 EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES ' The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 99.1 acres of commercial and office development ' with 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail uses. To annex the project into the City, the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance No. 3287-83. 1 Ordinance No. 5142-91 subsequently amended the Development Order and Conceptual Plan to provide 200,000sf of industrial use, a maximum floor area ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change to the project phasing, extension of build-out date and a change in the timing of payment for transportation costs. Ordinance 5722-95 further amended the Order by changing development phasing to one phase, decreasing office space, extending the build-out date to the year 2000, and adding a conversion factor to allow for multi-family residential development along with the conversion of either office or industrial to multi-family. The latest amendments to the Park Place development order were approved by the City as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, 1996. This amendment provided the land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. The current project components are as follows: Existing Retail Commercial 82,020 Office 120,560 Industrial 100,000 Residential 390 Approved / Under Construction Proposed Maximum 183,900 150,000 795,520 200,000 510 Please see EXHIBIT B of this Annual Report for the adopted REVISED MAP H, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 1 EXHIBIT B Revised Map H Master Development Plan r i+ a3 u? u? [17 I? f?`1 a / OLLF•TO43AY SCULEVARO COMMERCIAL 25,000 SF (RETAIL) (16,837 SF EXISTING) 0 930 300 LAND USE SCHEDULE LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL 53,278 SF 94.722 SF 150.000 SF OFFICE 120.560 SF 674.960 SF 795,520 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100.000 SF 100.000 SF 200.000 SF TOTAL 275.838 SF 869.682 SF 045.520 SF NOTES: , 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER 2 THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 2000. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF L000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. OR LOOO SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2-44 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS. OR L000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 1.54 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS. ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED. 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE UMf i ED TO PARCELS Z3.8 8. 5. CONVERSION RATES OF L000 SF OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 2,875 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OR L000 SF OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 11.96 ROOMS OF HOTEL DEVELOPMENT. OR L000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 4.16 ROOMS OF HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 4. l KING ENS/NEEA/NG ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK PLACE DRI - REVISED MASTER -DEVELOPMENT PLAN i Planners, Engineers, Surveyors ; MAP H FMMSEDJjW M 1996 1 u 1 i EXHIBIT B-1 U.S. 19 Parcel Site Plan (Parcel 8) 1 1 1 I I 1 1 A 1 F 0 1 a 1 y I 1 p " a A Cr r1? A W reyu / W A N F e N 1 a 1 W , 1 t 1 1 1 1 e A M MW ttaM 010P 1= K ®?1pIDMM ? SIN ? tmnl arm. T0m104 a e1 MM 99a W"MM M 9,t V®Ohl amrm4wlu TOW Tq IMd OJ WTLWWO 01 /01N "M9'A01A 4101 /T.r 1 V Ihl 0d 010 TV49IOT 9 It M 1V 910 Ol on nAMI VKI= am V10 ed ww IOYM Eh09 aanu nrm Ft. M II V F Trp ME10ta WA ¦a09 VmU 119 4 \a7raywa'u OG9 90..01 :41? 1 N N N N N N N N M N M 9 N 30a1TW 4 N Mgr Y.1110 V{hN V. i0m 7113. Y. 9m N W, .Vr dM 919 a1 Waal V. Mm M Nla ?MW 1014111 W1?9 1110 V. 11J1 V. N anc N N N N u cVOe. m N N N ID rt awu[u auavtu N f N WN N ¦Wt IDn 9a N 1.-Vat m-IR as 1910 V. N )IM II II II II II I 1 II II II II I I WAT MM l01 O>t9C M % /rte / / ?pL r v a:,um. _ b t9M1tt 9eMw ----------------- .n• 1T?tU w PAMW SPACE DETAL ara KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK PLACE - U.S.19 PARCEL Engineers • Planners • Surveyors • Scientists • landscape Architects 9,s 09, y kt 9010 WW X-.0 OW. e409 w1rN..ht M., ¦EXHIBIT B-1 Cl. 24945 nnw, FL, 34623 sw0 200 stab 42 lea. 2..1 rNe., n. x (WI "°. FL. „999 FINAL SITE PLAN (eal to-00 oW leaf e•/.99a, ?aL'xxr, uro\ ,++Iw rr Nlerlt r-yaMirOS 4t `t1.•.ytr lrgw+?rir rpllq?YU M+i ? »rt.r wrlrurrwrrrrr•.rlrrw r wr?.rwr rr u?:.rrrw wr "r r ar r rout r•rrwlrwr wr rlr r rw.tra?.^ w.?•r1rr..r.rrwwrtIwtwi «.. I?twr•. ww l.n.r ltr..r •wrr .r..rww ?w Irl..? r... rr1 aN r..w w.+n «o y?+. 7.+Nr«?.w.w•t..n«rrrwu.r a ¦. r+wr•. r.1 y .+i.i?+r?.w rltti?rra?:w:y+uu ..?nwrrwrr. r.rrr i? ?tw?i rYr errwrrnrr rgrlr rr ?•?.r u'r•.::.rr.:rwr•wr... rwr r1.w w.Y1. w...... w tr •t1?a «N.rotM haM r +•r i t. r •r-M1?r l E: i rYh+r•IY4L too Y.y` rrtr?I•Iw r+0iw rr« rw t-Srv+r* ....I rraa r w. r r rr1 ?.w.. ?a+ r er It ww. trrar.. rw I nw r r r r r MIW //t. ,Yt l/rnOaYw? pltt?? ?rw?+w rrtrM .?r Otrvt.. r+ w??t1•yft"] /_t. tLr•r•arw•a.trw•rwl.w•w.0t ttrt 0 as N a tm/SIC w.1 .+nY YII Yet r rt r?wrr?tw rirwltw•r p..Y .? •atr nW7 nw1 ?tavrt.u iav.+t ir.•?w r ••r?. otmraa?or.a+a' r+wur+w r r..r ?.«1rw.IN..r..r ? r-e PTECh4r WHEEL STOP "A ?w?r«?ttm .?r•.r two _wrW u nwrw rr•r wwww` ?.? HANDICAPPED PAMW •u t wrtlrM rr Y •rL arOr «? 01[IgT Mt M IRr mt 1M MWM11 As' UM 1 FT, 3.11 ?r 1 o EXHIBIT C Summary of Development Activity EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY During the 1998/99 reporting year, construction was completed on the 101,900sf office building on Parcel 4. Additionally, construction plans were prepared, submitted and approved by the City of Clearwater for a 1,600 sf expansion of the cafeteria on Parcel 1. Construction was approved, on the 82,000sf office building on Parcel 8 however, construction has not yet commenced. Construction was completed on the Grand Reserve and the expansion of the ophthalmics facility parking. EXHIBIT D Park Place DRI Ownership 1 '7 ' EXHIBIT D PARK PLACE DRI OWNERSHIP 1 Parcel Parcel No. Property Owner 1 17-29-16-88546-000-0010 Bausch & Lomb Surgical I 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P. ' 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 1101 N. Lake Destiny Dr., Suite 400 Maitland, FL 32751 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche 200 East Las Olas Blvd., #400 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 Stacy Glenborough 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 311 Park Place Blvd., Suite 170 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 Clearwater, FL 33759 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 Garcia Enterprises Tampa, Inc. 15950 Bay Vista Drive, Suite 250 Clearwater, FL 33760 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 Alex-Arl Florida Company 901 Venetian Bay Blvd. Venice, FL 34292 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010 Clant, Inc. 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020 P.O. Box 916464 11C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030 Longwood, FL 37291 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 1 EXHIBIT F Permit Information EXHIBIT F PERMIT INFORMATION List of Development Approvals and Permits For Reporting Year Ending September 1, 1999 Approval/Permit Agency Status/Approval Date PARCEL 2 Well Permit SWFWMD June 1999 PARCEL 8 Department of CS52-0139900-003 Environmental Protection approved 5/19/99 97A-799-0056 Florida Department of approved 12/13/98 Transportation 1 EXHIBIT G Compliance With Development Order Conditions 1 1 1 r EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments, as contained in the Park Place DR[ Development Order (amended 11/221/96) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: Conditions & Commitments Compliance ' SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and final Site Plans submitted for All development activity must receive the ' each phase and consistent with DRI appropriate City approval, consistent with the "Conceptual Plan". "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved vis Ordinance No. 6107-96. AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the Developer has complied. conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be ' notified. B. All development shall be consistent with All development activity is reviewed and approved ' applicable land development codes. by the City of Clearwater at time of plan approval. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated Developer has complied. to the City of Clearwater. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. Park Place Blvd. Constructed and accepted by City. constructed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. ' C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 sf Conversion factor utilized to allow 390 multifamily (795,520sf office use, 150,000sf retail, units. 200,000sf industrial) subject to conversion factors. CC. Mass transit requirements. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. ' (Bus stop on Park Place Blvd. was constructed as part of apartment project) D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the Access previously acquired. project. E. Funding commitments for transportation All developer commitments have been met. improvements prior to the first Final Site Plan approval after 1/19/95. t I Conditions & Commitments Compliance EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City 10' easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. Developer has complied. F. -Deleted via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. Curb cut and median turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting year. 1. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. (Approved Grand Reserve Site Plan maintains aquatic lands) L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the SWFWMD have been issued permits for all land project drainage system. development activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. The individual contractors are being held responsible for compliance with permit conditions. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as of water quality maintenance. needed. 0. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Proposed development complies by connecting Hampton Road to Park Place Blvd. To existing Drew St. and US 19 shopping with sidewalks. I Conditions & Commitments Compliance ?a ? s. ? T. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. 1 1 1 1 W ?r season. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. Osprey nest has been relocated successfully and occupied by osprey. Developer has complied; a capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. Maintenance of on-site wells. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Well on Parcel 2 required rerouting to provide fresh water. Original well was drilled too deep. SWFWMD permit was issued and well repaired accordingly. N/A (City requirement) Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvement costs in accordance with the applicable revised Development Order conditions. 4 , ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83 AND ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, A DEVELOPMENT' ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO CHANGE THE PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT, DECREASE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, CLARIFY THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS ALLOCATED TO EACH PARCEL OF THE DEVELOPMENT, EXTEND THE BUILD- OUT DATE, ADD A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, REVISE CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONCERNING TRANSPORTA- TION MITIGATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND RESTATE ALL REMAINING TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEVELOPER, INCLUDING THE OBLIGATION TO DEDICATE AND CONSTRUCT PARK PLACE BOULEVARD; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development'); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No.. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and 5 71? 'I-) -?? WHEREAS, on August 29, 1994, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., and Building Operation Holding Company, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to.a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional. Planning Council ("TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) amend the phasing of the development from one phase with three subphases to one phase with no subphases; (ii) decrease office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarify. the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extend the build-out date by four (4) years; (v) add a conversion factor for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi- family residential development; (vi) amend certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; (vii) restate all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) amend certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, the ownership of the Development is as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted, _ and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and 2 -,?- 7,2 2 -7s WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83 and No. 5142-91, , is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., and Building Operation Holding Company, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," have proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Modifying the phasing of the development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; and 2. Decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; and 3. Clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; and 4. Extending the build-out date by four (4) years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; and 5. Adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; and 6. Deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; and 3 _ q 7. Restating all remaining transportation improvement obligations of _ the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and 8. Modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "C," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter. 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt 4 S17 - 9S from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DR! remains vested thereunder. - E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Building Operation Holding Company and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended as shown on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C." B. Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read.- 4-C. The Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,145,520 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795,520 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factor set forth in Subsection Q. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. C. Section 4.C.1. of the Development Order is amended to add the following sentence: No FAR is applicable to multi-family residential use. 5 D. Section 4.C.2. of the Development Order is amended to read: The Project shall consist of one phase as follows: Completion Maximum Floor Area in Square Feet Year RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TOTAL 150, 000* 795,520- 200,000- 1,145, 520 2000 `Includes 55,278 square feet existing as of 8/1/94. "Includes 120,560 square feet existing as of 8/1/94. -Includes 100,000 square feet existing as of 8/1/94. The above development is allocated among the parcels described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein as follows: MnYIM11M 171 nna A CA IKI Cr%FfArpG C==T PARCEL NO. RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL 1 200,000 2 171,400 3 258,700 4 60,000 5 120,560 6 120,000 7 60,000 8 124,860 9 5,000 10 10,000 11 15,000 TOTALS 150,000 795,520 200,000 The owner of a parcel to which development rights are allocated may assign all or part of those development rights to another parcel or parcels so long as the land use designation of the parcel to which the assignment_ is made permits development of the rights assigned. E. Section 4.E. of the Development Order is amended to read: Prior to the approval of the firstiRit-ial final site plan for the Development after the effective date of this Ordinancegubphas I . funding I commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the . financial 6 responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improvements. C '9 5/'96 . . 5 ^ m the deye!G M°Rt geneTat°es 5 k h. t t l N 2 pea Re -ex eYFIa be-FTe, idea iR GFdeF te ebtai RA t t f th n a- 5 G Mee M eF e 12. Construct access points to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidshall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. - 23. At he-S-R eas GU^d tG RGFthbGFARdeXG!usi ve le# WFR-lanes. The ^^st ef these ., GGRStFUGtiRg these impFevemeRtS. [This iMP-FGyemeRt has bee 6eITIpleted.] -install or renovate, as appropriate, traffic. signals at the south project I entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has aidshatF-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall I assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 36. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersection with Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidshaia-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements have been completed .] 46. Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U.S. 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement has been completedis ] 57-. At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct aR additional eastbound and westbound through lanes and additional exclusive left aad-fight -turn lanes on all approaches,_ and an additional right turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. The through lanes shall be continued to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paideha4-pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improvements. subSE)GtiGR ., 68. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane divided arterial from U.S. 19 to N.E. Coachman Road, and add turn lanes at all signalized intersections in between. A funding commitment has been made for Tthis improvement which is programmed for constructionseted to in the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program foras-,^g--ee:istFu6ccd fiscal year 1995/1996'9292. s S7a2 2 - 9S F. Subsection 4.F. of the Development Order is hereby deleted. G. Subsection 4.G.1. is hereby deleted. H. Subsection 4.G.2. of the Development Order is amended to read: 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has gaids#a4-pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements are completed-eXGept fef HaF,qptGR Read.] Subsection 4.G.3 is amended to read as follows: ( 3. Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane divided link (two through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of this improvement shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer has paidsha4--pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. A funding commitment has been made for Tthis improvement which is scheduled by the City of Clearwater for its 1994/1995 '°? Fiscal Year. J. Subsection 4.G.4. is hereby deleted. K. The Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvements in accordance with revised Subsections 4.E.1 through 4.E.3, 4.E..5, 4.G.2., 4.G.3. and 42. of the Development Order. The only remaining obligation of the Developer concerning the transportation improvements is contained in Subsection 4.B.B. of the Development Order, as set forth in Section 4.N. of this Ordinance. L. The build-out year is hereby extended by a cumulative period of nine (9) C years through 2000. 9 s?? a - 9s M. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.A.A.: A.A. Conversion factors to permit 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 2.44 units of multi-family residential development and/or 1,000 square feet of industrial development to convert to either (i) 633 square feet of office development or (ii) 1.54 units of multi-family residential development are hereby established for the office and industrial areas shown as Parcels 1, 2, 3 and/or 8 on Exhibit "B." Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) multi-family residential development shall be permitted on Parcels 2, 3 and/or 8 only; (ii) reference to Parcel 2 herein specifically excludes the portion of Parcel 2 which is designated as "Preservation"; and (iii) development shall be limited as follows; MINIMUM MAXIMUM Industrial 100,000- 200,000- Office 240,560* 858,820* Multi-familResidential 0*- 510** .square feet of floor area "units N. Thirty (30) days prior to is of any permit which utilizes the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notice, from the Developer, of the proposed use of the conversion ratio. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. B. B.: 1. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any development permit for any portion of Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 shown on Exhibit "B," but in no event later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. The City will cease to issue any and all building permits and development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.1. 2. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B" shall be completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: f 10 57??? -°?? (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 4 or 6 on Exhibit "B"; or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6, or 7, upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.2. 3. The portions of Park Place Boulevard adjoining Parcels 1, 2 and 3 shown on Exhibit "B" which have been dedicated shall be . completely constructed in accordance with the City's specifications on or before the earlier of the following: (i) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 2 or 3 shown on Exhibit "B"; or (ii) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 1, 2, or 3 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B.3. 0. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. C. C.: C.C. In order to facilitate mass transit service to the Park Place development, the Developer will work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority ("PSTA") as follows: 1. PSTA is allowed to run buses through the development in order to serve Park Place from both Drew Street and Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard. 2. The Developer grants permission to PSTA for the on-site installation of bus stops, benches, and shelters along the main roadway connecting Drew Street and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. 3. The Developer shall endeavor to notify PSTA at least two (2) months in advance of build-out, in order for PSTA to revise the necessary routes and schedules, install bus stops, passenger benches, and passenger shelters. S 2,2'.2 - %S- P. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.D.D.: D.D. The City may not adjust the green time for State Road 60 at the Bennigan's driveway to account for Development traffic if such adjustment would result in an unacceptable level of service on State Road 60. Q. The following is added to Subsection S.A. of the Development Order, as an additional item to be contained in the annual report: 6. A cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during the reporting year. R. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. S. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. T. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Building Operation Holding Company, DCA and TBRPC. U. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. V. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 45 days after copies _ have been transmitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida _ 12 Department of Community Affairs unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING January 5, 1995 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynt a E. Goudeau City Clerk 1 Approved as to form and correctness: J Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Ownership Exhibit "C" - Revised Map H #0022230.01 d-11 32112.91761 #0022230.01 J Mayor - Commissioner 13 January 19„1 1995 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 114; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. 5 -7,2,:? - ys- EXHIBIT "B" to Ordinance No. 5722-95 PARK PLACE OWNERS No parcel I.D. No. 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 2 ' 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 4 17-29-16-00000-230-1300 5 ' 17-29-16-000GO-240-0600 Owner Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 34619 Park Place Bldg. Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Park Place Building Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 v1 No Parcel I.D. No. Owner 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 I Park Place Building Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134. 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 Park Place Bldg. Ltd. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 17-29-16-00000-230-0200 Building Operation Holding Co. c/o PNC Realty Holding Corp. One PNC Plaza, 18th Floor Fifth Avenue & Wood Street Pittsburg, PA 115222 w g 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 MRL #C-1111 Ltd. o N Suite X215 w 2800 Routh Street a Dallas, TX 75201 w 10 17-29-16-00000-230-1000 MDC Associates 81-A Ltd. c/o Provident National Bank Attn: Marvin F. Poer & Co. 111 North Orange Avenue Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32801 No 11 0048845.01/mme Parcel I.D. No. 17-29-16-00000-240-0500 Owner MDC Associates 81-A Ltd. c/o Provident National Bank Attn: Marvin F. Poer & Co. 111 North Orange Avenue Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32801 l? 'IT P4 0 M W a a J m PARMM 3 t PA PC I ?l Now 4 + O i QZ .1.? r MRC . 4 PAF= 2 PARCEL s ? o PA RCEL. 6 f; 2A Pd=L 7 PARCEL 5 r s ,.... s t6 A. Q I m - 2 Q aa PARCEL 10 PARCEZ, L1 ""' '•• n O ® :./ ? Z 45 o b ` nv ro 8AY PAGE 4 OF 4 . : OREW STREET . PARCEL T LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF PARCEL (100,000 SF EXISTING) OFFICE 258,700 SF I o C EXISTWG -- NATURAL ACCESS AREA J y OFFICE PARCEL 2 124.860 SF PARCEL 4 ww,? OFFICE PARCEL 6 171,400 SF COM5ZPARCEL5 (125,(55,276 OFME ICE (120,000 SF PLANNED) EXISTING) PARCEL 6 PARCEL T O .EIGj / PARCEk 9 11Cp0. E0 S O L II ' (PAR 00 SI PA IL ACCESS ACCESS Gam' 1? PROPOSED AA&D(mT Of SOUARE FOOTAGE foot 90NIOUAL LIDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE USED ON y BEST AVAILABLE 4AAKE-T INFORMATION AID ARE 0 SUB.IECT TO CHANGE. THE ALOLINT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE 0 AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REU"a H TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE -PLAMED Z DEVELOPMENT'. THE BLILD-OUT DATE FOR THE >C O wCNT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT PL L OO (? H 3. CONVERSION RATES Of L000 SQUARE FEET CF LIGHT I DUSTRAL DEVELOPMENT TO 033 SQUARE H FEET Of 4FICE DEVELDPMENT. OR Looo SQUARE FEET OF F7C[ DEVELOPMENT TO 2 7-. H .41 141.71-FAMILY LMTS, OR 1000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGM IuDUSTRUL 0 - DEVELOPMEN'T TO 134 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, ARE HEREBY ESTABuSHED. Ln 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT J WILL BE LUM TO PARCELS 2.S S 6. N N I lD Ln Otifl0.6Nf 60.AEw,1D COMMERCIAL (RETAL) KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, Planners, Engineers, Surveyors PARK PLACE DRI - REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN JE 7AP I ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91 AND ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR RETAIL COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND HOTEL DEVELOPMENT; REFLECTING THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP AND CONFIGURATION OF THE PARCELS OF THE DEVELOPMENT; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on , 1996, Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and Ordinance No. 6107-96 WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflect changes in the ownership and configuration of the parcels of property within the Development (collectively, the "Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, the ownership of the Development is as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, portions of the Development are individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, and No. 5722- 2 Ordinance No. 6107-96 95, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.31.67(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owner of Parcel 4 of the Development as shown on Exhibit "B," has proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1. Adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 for the conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development; and 2. Reflecting changes in the ownership and configuration of the parcels of property within the Development; and 3. Modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Changes are not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "C," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. 3 Ordinance No. 6107-96 C. The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted. pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C." 4 Ordinance No. 6107-96 B C Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read: 4. C. The Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,145, 520 square feet, comprised of a maximum 795,520 square feet of office use, a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maximum 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the conversion factor set forth in Subsection 4.A.A. The permitted maximum floor area is to be approved subject to the FAR limitations set forth below. Subsection 4.A.A. of the Development Order is amended to add the following: Conversion factors to permit (i) 1,000 square feet of retail commercial development to convert to either (x) 2,875 square feet of office development or (y) 11.96 hotel rooms and/or (ii) 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 4.16 hotel rooms are hereby established for the retail commercial area shown as Parcel 4 on Exhibit "B." These conversion factors are set forth in the following table: Notwithstanding the foregoing, development on Parcel4 shall be limited as follows: MINIMUM MAXIMUM Office 0 130, 505* Hotel 0** 224** 'square feet of floor area "rooms D Thirty (30) days prior to issuance of any permit which utilizes the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notice, from the Developer, of the proposed use of the conversion ratio. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4. E. E.: 5 Ordinance No. 6107-96 E. E. Prior to the issuance of any development permit for any portion of Parcel 4, the owner of Parcel 4 shall grant to the City a perpetual non-exclusive easement for pedestrian ingress and egress and construction and maintenance of a sidewalk at the City's cost. Such easement shall be ten feet (10') in width along the southerly boundary of Parcel 4 and shall extend from the westerly boundary of Parcel 4 to the easterly boundary of Parcel 4 ("Sidewalk Easement"). The City agrees that the Sidewalk Easement may be located within any setback areas on Parcel 4 and shall not have the effect of enlarging any Parcel 4 setbacks or otherwise reducing the development rights for Parcel 4. E. The following subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.F.F.: F. F. The owner of Parcel 4 shall be entitled to curb cuts for the purpose of access to and from Parcel 4 and Park Place Boulevard. F. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. G. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. H. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. J. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. 6 Ordinance No. 6107-96 PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Rita Garvey Mayor - Commissioner 7 Ordinance No. 6107-96 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. Ordinance No. 6107-96 FcB-?2-1oc` i6 ?? rrUM iY Jf _Lw. zfvulN=_ lNV TO 1441Ubi1 do C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CIEARWATER. FLORIDA 34 618-4748 February 27, 1992 Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. Post office Box 1368 Clearwater, Florida 34617-1368 RE: Park Place Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter responds to your letter dated February 25, 1992, regarding Park place impact fees and employment of King Engineering to do certain design work for improvements to be made to Hampton Road. The development order for Park Place was enacted in 1983 by city Ordinance No. 3205-83, as amended by Ordinance No. 3287-83, effective October 20, 1983. Section 4Z of the development order provided for the payment of certain moneys to the City to mitigate transportation impacts. Section 4Z specifically provided that payment of these moneys constituted "final and complete payment of the developer'.s proportionate share for any and all off-site transportation improvements..." In 1986, Pinellas County adopted its transportation impact fee ordinance. The original ordinance, as well as all amendments thereto, purports to be enacted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Fla. Stat. §163.3167(9)(1985),provided:. Nothing in this act shall limit or modify the rights of any person to complete any development that has been authorized as a development of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380... ; An identical provision exists today as Fla. Stat. §163.3167(8)(1991). These provisions "vest" developments of regional impact against changes in comprehensive plans and land. development regulations which would "limit or modify" the ability of the developer to complete the project. Clearly, unbudgeted additional expenditures for transportation mitigation, such as those which might be claimed to be owing under, the County's transportation impact fee ordinance, would "limit or modify" the ability of the developer to complete Park Place. Accordingly, because of this vesting provision, and because of the specific language contained in Section 4Z of the development order, payment of the transportation mitigation requirements imposed by the development order is the sole transportation `mitigation" payment that may be required incident to development of Park Place and no impact fees would be payable under the County's impact fee ordinance. (continued) It 04 rttJ-c f - 1 77G L r rMui'I r jr, _ivu i r+C?f AU u 1 Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire February 27, 1992 Page 2 (continued) This letter will also confirm that the amount owing under Section 4Z of the Park Place development order is $703,762.49, if paid on or before February 27, 1992. The amount owing thereafter increases at the rate of $105.04 per day. Turning to Hampton Road, this letter confirms that the Developer has requested that King Engineering be hired by the Developer to perform the engineering work necessary for the widening of Hampton Road. The amount of the Engineering services contract will be paid directly by American Cyanamid to King with a credit applied to the Section 4Z figure of $703,762.49 in an amount of $99,875. Upon confirmation of City staff that the methodology and calculation of the $703,762.49 amount is acceptable and that the King Engineering services contract language and amount is in the City's best interest, a City Commission agenda item will be prepared and brought forward for approval by the Mayor and Commission. In the interim time building permits will be issued to the Developer on the condition that: a, the building permits are in all other respects appropriate; b. $603,887.49 (which is the $703,762.49 amount less the engineering credit of $99,875) is paid to the City as a partial payment of what the Commission-approved actual amount may be. in this manner all will be in place should the City Commission approve this arrangement and you would not have been held up as to your Building Permits. Likewise, should the Commission decide upon some other arrangement, adjustments can be made accordingly. We will, of course, have our Certificate of Occupancy authority in assuring that all commitments are forthcoming from the Developer. Finally, be aware that no amount of work, for which credit is to be made against the transportation mitigation payment is to be performed by King until such is authorized by this office. very truly yours, William C. Baker, Director of Public Works WCB:j1 copies: Michael J. Wright, City Manager Elizabeth Deptula, Assistant City Manager Cecil M. Henderson, Jr., Asst. Dir. of Public Works/Eng. Terence C. Jennings, Chief Engineer M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney James Polatty, Jr., Dir. of Planning & Development Ed Mazur, King Engineering Associates, Inc. PARK PLACE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 1998 September 1998 PREPARED FOR: BAUSH & LOMB SURGICAL 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 PREPARED BY: KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center, Suite 300 Tampa, FL 33634 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 1 li. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT ...................................... 1-4 III. EXHIBITS ................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H B-1 - U.S. 19 PARCEL, FINAL SITE PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - PARK PLACE OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - N/A EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS i I. INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via DRI Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the City of Clearwater (Ordinance Nos. 5142-91, 5722-95 and 6107-96) and Chapter 380.06 (18) F.S., and in conformance with Form RPM-BSP Annual Report-1. This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay Regional Council (TBRC), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: 9/1/97 to 9/1/98 Month/DayNear Month/DayNear Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Name of DRI Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer - Name: BAUSH & LOMB SURGICAL Company Name Address: 21 Park Place Boulevard North Street Location Clearwater. FL 34606 City, State, Zip Code 1. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. EXHIBIT A SHOULD ALSO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS IF APPLICABLE: A. DESCRIBE CHANGES IN THE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR PHASING FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AND FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS; B. STATE ANY KNOWN INCREMENTAL DRI APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OR REQUESTS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION THAT WERE FILED IN THE REPORTING YEAR AND TO BE FILED DURING THE NEXT YEAR; C. ATTACH A COPY OF ANY NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER OR THE SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF AN ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT WAS RECORDED BY THE DEVELOPER PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 380.06 (15) (F), F.S. No changes occurred the currently approved plan of development during this reporting year and none are anticipated during the next year. EXHIBIT A of this report contains a summary of Development Order changes for the project. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. No change in local jurisdiction occurred during this reporting year. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. The Amended Master Development Plan (MAP H) included in this report as EXHIBIT B is the currently approved Master Plan for the Park Place DRI. Exhibit B-1 includes the site plan for the U.S. 19 parcel (Parcel 8). 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. Please see EXHIBIT C of this report. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS 2 SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. The Storz Ophthalmics property was purchased by Baush & Lomb Surgical in December 1997. No other tracts of land in the Park Place development were sold to a separate entity or Developer during this reporting year. 6. DESCRIBE ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SITE SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. Please see EXHIBIT F, PERMIT INFORMATION, for a summary list of permit and approval information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. A list summarizing each Development Order condition and the developer's compliance with each condition is attached as EXHIBIT G, COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted .... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report. 3 To the best of our knowledge, construction will continue on the Grand Reserve, the Baush & Lomb expansion, the 8,200sf office building on Parcel 8 and the office building parking lot on Parcel 4. At the present time, we have no specific knowledge of additional plans being prepared or which may be submitted during the forthcoming reporting year for the remaining undeveloped portion of the DRI, Parcel 6. and: a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits .... which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report. Construction plans and a SWFWMD permit application are currently under review for the 8,200sf office building. Additional building permit requests for this building can be expected during the upcoming year. Construction permits have been issued for the 101,900sf office building on Parcel 4, and additional permits may be required prior to the building's completion in mid- 1999. and: a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year. No trade-off mechanisms were used by Park Place developers during this reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay Regional Council, the State Department of Community Affairs and the Southwest Florida Water Management District on September 11, copy of this 1998. In addition, owners identified in Exhibit D have be7t?' report. .,I /J Person comp leting the questionnaire: Richard K. Duffer. AICP Title: Director of Planning King Engineering Associates, Inc. Representing: Baush & Lomb Surgical 4 III. EXHIBITS Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit B-1 - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Summary of Development Order Changes Revised Map H, Master Development Plan U.S. 19 Parcel Site Plan (Parcel 8) Summary of Development Activity Park Place DRI Ownership Exhibit E - N/A Exhibit F - Permit Information Exhibit G - Compliance With Development Order Conditions 5 EXHIBIT A Summary of Development Order Changes EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 99.1 acres of commercial and office development with 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail uses. To annex the project into the City, the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance No. 3287-83. Ordinance No. 5142-91 subsequently amended the Development Order and Conceptual Plan to provide 200,000sf of industrial use, a maximum floor area ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change to the project phasing, extension of build-out date and a change in the-timing of payment for transportation costs. Ordinance 5722-95 further amended the Order by changing development phasing to one phase, decreasing office space, extending the build-out date to the year 2000, and adding a conversion factor to allow for multi-family residential development along with the conversion of either office or industrial to mufti-family. The latest amendments to the Park Place development order were approved by the City as Ordinance No. 6107-96 on November 21, 1996. This amendment provided the land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. The current project components are as follows: Existing Approved / Under Construction Proposed Maximum Retail Commercial 82,020 150,000 Office 120,560 183,900 795,520 Industrial 100,000 200,000 Residential 390 510 Please see EXHIBIT B of this Annual Report for the recently adopted REVISED MAP H, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 7 1 ? ? ? ? ? ar..a?vt ? fAil4 52: ? i¢1S , 1 M f rwLr MEW -?. - ------- rt ffw) \a :` v xmm n'i a°? ? ? i ? e 1 1 1 e ? I 1 Y 1 1 n I 1 1 1 F to 1 ? , W 1 ? A Q A o \ amp I W L- INU > 2 1 1 N II -i H70111 ? P- aacAO>a1a 1 a 1 , W US HWY 19 FRONTAGE ` . . ROAD SDEiNALK NOTE ?rttmrrroanQw?w? :21 OLfY.(p rmvalf I.f m awam QV]" Fri ofICUAIA IAtLG am p0{ M."aa 6 Q N W m OaIIGIq wR KI O N 6 fil Kl 6 N r.a.r raft mpl (•IR N Ipr YG R R r.® tLAf Y. lfalf V. Ia}r V. R asalt.4 MIIOiW.IaD rK RK YKR 171Wa NR, RI R. M I?I DI. OY rt, MR. N f0ln O.pflli.® N M N AOIDf RUi R rt r [ O cop M ar V.0a1 mat ®n0?lrlrlK N ..ra.- YYa OLN awru anm rm M M M A jMb li{LTfI „r. f M .Ifrpi M .IOpn (111 N M N M N M inn Wn au aafof . +nou N N11W W ru Nr ata .OALa rA ¦ rr. r t 0 OR1 M IeJ11. V. win :.t m ms MAL NIAI Q fr.MZW am 2118 V.t? mR mrr eartr/c tu® eArrv® sR 01.a C.f[ Mtld IpUrn N M N RI® Im[II. mm M W Il MDQ W W R .r0i?mal ln?r R1-1R =-rm 00 rt.r f W l.aAY Jss Ifw N =Oa V. @A ar ..Ni M 111 al. Blfm ' ! mro ' I ?!w Ida al Vitt 1111 as M u1r v. u v. tYa v. N 1 r-- r I I I I I -MIAMM Sm xmm 9 FWP 1 drum tlC Im OALL mfli 1 vrrm my a C31E Imma"s 1 . sU?m1:10/` 1 .N( .1AG \I` I I L--------------------- I I I I I 1 I I r-_j I I I I I 1 I I I I I I H Pa4m VET ffTWIM POO @M S.F. 7 STORY OFFICE intro (Tall / 1 /"`• LIIIII"1111111111 ??? I IIII / ?'?' / / fill / P t'.n? r------1 r , -l r------1 ?, e 1 1 I p 1 1 r? f 1 I f lAal, n. \1\` ?a w1a, wmlf faf .u. PARlONG SPACE DETAL au LEGAL DESCRPTION i?r.Y?=Y fr. n.rr.... =r.A: rr-r `r.rrr p` r.?.i._ ..rr._rrYa.r?::. r._«_1_m rw..Y .rte... w.rrw_ra? r+yar+.w.f nrr... a rww-.rrr._u. ? °.raw yr_.`i? r ??~rr =9r?brY Y^i ?..Y.?rM ?rYr.rw_r..rr.rrryr w.w.? ?n1 ?rr.of_?r Y it A. r.r? m- w ...r. ? .oar .1°??.?0w ? .rwi?n..?rni: .?a?I.ra.w +r.?w irA ?y M.i. aw.n?M:?rivR.rR wr ...ti w.Y. r....r +... w w. u.a.r.r asr I I _.wrv II -'If • a1.ar ? aI .,_.. u 10.w f-f PRCQA,V WHEEL STOP HANDCAPP® PAR10?0 u w `e?+ ml.o m. ®r aaaea r?- KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK PLACE - U.S.19 PARCEL 1 arc Engineers Planners - Surveyors Scientists • landscape Architects <? r WBEXHIBIT 8-1 ui n M. 5010 West N.aN. IM a+ a Y..rdw 1.4... 34423 ? r- FL- 7760! Qr.. v.1 .; FL. ,4651 FINAL SITE PLAN Ilul 7!7.01 (AU) MMa50. a arc alma mAM=m.V etM1r.m -- R.!rn?I1lOO aAA tYu 1, a" 1W. ?-aa[a MclO ?, I La - m =m a scour ------- fd e.war MWM 1 ? ? ? ? ? ar..a?vt ? fAil4 52: ? i¢1S , 1 M f rwLr MEW -?. - ------- rt ffw) \a :` v xmm n'i a°? ? ? i ? e 1 1 1 e ? I 1 Y 1 1 n I 1 1 1 F to 1 ? , W 1 ? A Q A o \ amp I W L- INU > 2 1 1 N II -i H70111 ? P- aacAO>a1a 1 a 1 , W US HWY 19 FRONTAGE ` . . ROAD SDEiNALK NOTE ?rttmrrroanQw?w? :21 OLfY.(p rmvalf I.f m awam QV]" Fri ofICUAIA IAtLG am p0{ M."aa 6 Q N W m OaIIGIq wR KI O N 6 fil Kl 6 N r.a.r raft mpl (•IR N Ipr YG R R r.® tLAf Y. lfalf V. Ia}r V. R asalt.4 MIIOiW.IaD rK RK YKR 171Wa NR, RI R. M I?I DI. OY rt, MR. N f0ln O.pflli.® N M N AOIDf RUi R rt r [ O cop M ar V.0a1 mat ®n0?lrlrlK N ..ra.- YYa OLN awru anm rm M M M A jMb li{LTfI „r. f M .Ifrpi M .IOpn (111 N M N M N M inn Wn au aafof . +nou N N11W W ru Nr ata .OALa rA ¦ rr. r t 0 OR1 M IeJ11. V. win :.t m ms MAL NIAI Q fr.MZW am 2118 V.t? mR mrr eartr/c tu® eArrv® sR 01.a C.f[ Mtld IpUrn N M N RI® Im[II. mm M W Il MDQ W W R .r0i?mal ln?r R1-1R =-rm 00 rt.r f W l.aAY Jss Ifw N =Oa V. @A ar ..Ni M 111 al. Blfm ' ! mro ' I ?!w Ida al Vitt 1111 as M u1r v. u v. tYa v. N 1 r-- r I I I I I -MIAMM Sm xmm 9 FWP 1 drum tlC Im OALL mfli 1 vrrm my a C31E Imma"s 1 . sU?m1:10/` 1 .N( .1AG \I` I I L--------------------- I I I I I 1 I I r-_j I I I I I 1 I I I I I I H Pa4m VET ffTWIM POO @M S.F. 7 STORY OFFICE intro (Tall / 1 /"`• LIIIII"1111111111 ??? I IIII / ?'?' / / fill / P t'.n? r------1 r , -l r------1 ?, e 1 1 I p 1 1 r? f 1 I f lAal, n. \1\` ?a w1a, wmlf faf .u. PARlONG SPACE DETAL au LEGAL DESCRPTION i?r.Y?=Y fr. n.rr.... =r.A: rr-r `r.rrr p` r.?.i._ ..rr._rrYa.r?::. r._«_1_m rw..Y .rte... w.rrw_ra? r+yar+.w.f nrr... a rww-.rrr._u. ? °.raw yr_.`i? r ??~rr =9r?brY Y^i ?..Y.?rM ?rYr.rw_r..rr.rrryr w.w.? ?n1 ?rr.of_?r Y it A. r.r? m- w ...r. ? .oar .1°??.?0w ? .rwi?n..?rni: .?a?I.ra.w +r.?w irA ?y M.i. aw.n?M:?rivR.rR wr ...ti w.Y. r....r +... w w. u.a.r.r asr I I _.wrv II -'If • a1.ar ? aI .,_.. u 10.w f-f PRCQA,V WHEEL STOP HANDCAPP® PAR10?0 u w `e?+ ml.o m. ®r aaaea r?- KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK PLACE - U.S.19 PARCEL 1 arc Engineers Planners - Surveyors Scientists • landscape Architects <? r WBEXHIBIT 8-1 ui n M. 5010 West N.aN. IM a+ a Y..rdw 1.4... 34423 ? r- FL- 7760! Qr.. v.1 .; FL. ,4651 FINAL SITE PLAN Ilul 7!7.01 (AU) MMa50. a arc alma mAM=m.V etM1r.m -- R.!rn?I1lOO aAA tYu 1, a" 1W. ?-aa[a MclO ?, I La - m =m a scour ------- fd e.war MWM EXHIBIT B-1 U.S. 19 Parcel Site Plan (Parcel 8) 10 0- a I o EXISTING ( ACCESS G"-T0.8" 801LEVARO COMMERCIAL 25,000 SF (RETAIL) (16,857 SF EXISTING) ACCESS ACCESS 0 150 300 LAND USE SCHEDULE LAN) USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL 55278 SF 94,722 SF 150.000 SF OFFICE 120,560 SF 674,960 SF 795.520 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF TOTAL 275,838 SF 869,682 SF U45,520 SF NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO. CHANGE. THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE -PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-.. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 2000. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF L000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. OR 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS. OR L000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 1.54 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS. ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED. 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMPED TO PARCELS Z3. B, 8. 5. CONVERSION;RATES OF L000 SF OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 2.875 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OR L000 SF OF RETAIL COMMERCIAI: DEVELOPMENT TO 11.96 ROOMS OF HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, OR L000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 4.16 ROOMS OF HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 4. KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, ANC, MAP H PARK PLACE DRI - REVISED MASTEI,-_DEVELOPMENT PLAN Planners, Engineers, Surveyors ?° EXHIBIT C Summary of Development Activity 12 EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY During the 1997/98 reporting year, construction plans were prepared, submitted and approved by the City of Clearwater for the 8,200sf office building on Parcel 8 and the 101,900sf office building on Parcel 4. Construction was completed on the remaining Park Place Boulevard and Joe's Crab Shack on Parcel 11 D. Construction is continuing at the Grand Reserve and for the expansion of the ophthalmics facility parking. 13 EXHIBIT D Park Place DRI Ownership 14 EXHIBIT D PARK PLACE DRI OWNERSHIP Parcel Parcel No. Property Owner 1 17-29-16-88546-000-0010 Baush & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Blvd. N. Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 The Grand Reserve at Park Place L.P. 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 1101 N. Lake Destiny Dr., Suite 400 Maitland, FL 32751 4 17-29-16-00000-230-0130 Park Place Land Ltd., Deloitte & Touche 200 East Las Olas Blvd., #400 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 5 17-29-16-00000-240-0600 Park Place Building Ltd. 6 17-29-16-00000-240-0400 420 Park Place Blvd. 7 17-29-16-00000-230-1100 Clearwater, FL 33579 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 Garcia Enterprises Tampa, Inc. 15950 Bay Vista Drive, Suite 250 Clearwater, FL 33760 9 17-29-16-59392-001-0010 Alex-Arl Florida Company 901 Venetian Bay Blvd. Venice, FL 34292 10A 17-29-16-66373-000-0010 Clant, Inc. 10B 17-29-16-66373-000-0020 P.O. Box 916464 11C 17-29-16-66373-000-0030 Longwood, FL 37291 11D 17-29-16-66373-000-0040 11E 17-29-16-66373-000-0050 15 EXHIBIT F Permit Information 16 EXHIBIT F List of Development Approvals and Permits For Reporting Year Ending September 1, 1998 Approval/Permit Agency Status/Approval Date PARCEL 8 drainage SWFWMD under review construction Plans City of Clearwater under review PARCEL 1, LOT 1 489844.04 SWFWMD approved 5/15/98 construction City of Clearwater approved PARCEL 4 construction City of Clearwater approved 7/28/98 469844.05 SWFWMD approved 5/6/98 water & sewer City of Clearwater, FDEP approved 17 EXHIBIT G Compliance With Development Order Conditions 18 EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS All conditions of approval and Developers commitments, as contained in the Park Place DRI Development Order (amended 11/221/96) and the ADA, are still in effect and being met. A brief review and statement of compliance with the conditions outlined are as follows: Conditions & Commitments Compliance SECTION 4. A. Preliminary and final Site Plans submitted for each phase and consistent with DRI "Conceptual Plan". All development activity must receive the appropriate City approval, consistent with the "Amended Conceptual Plan", Exhibit C, approved vis Ordinance No. 6107-96. AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. B. All development shall be consistent with applicable land development codes. BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated to the City of Clearwater. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. constructed prior to C.O.'s for Parcels 4 or 6, or 12/31/98. C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 sf (795,520sf office use, 150,000sf retail, 200,000sf industrial) subject to conversion factors. CC. Mass transit requirements. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to the first Final Site Plan approval after 1/19/95. Developer has complied. All development activity is reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater at time of plan approval. Developer has complied. No action required during reporting year Conversion factor utilized to allow 390 multifamily units. Developer has complied and will continue to do so. (Bus stop on Park Place Blvd. was constructed as part of apartment project) Access previously acquired. All developer commitments have been met. 19 EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City 10' easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. F. -Deleted via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. - Deleted via Ordinance No. 5142-91 - J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with City and retention policies. L. M N. O P. Measures to control water quality and erosion. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the project drainage system. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. Drainage Plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. No action required during reporting year. Curb cut and median turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. Developer has paid or committed to fund. No action required during reporting year. Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. (Approved Grand Reserve Site Plan maintains aquatic lands) Individual developers have continued to maintain respective construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. SWFWMD has issued permits for all land development activity. These permits contain water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. The individual contractors are being held responsible for compliance with permit conditions. Paved surfaces have continued to be cleaned as needed. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. 20 Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required. R. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. S. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. T. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. U. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. V. Site Plans include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possible. W. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. X. Maintenance of on-site wells. Y. N/A (City requirement) Z. Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. Proposed development complies by connecting Hampton Road to Park Place Blvd. To existing Drew St. and US 19 shopping with sidewalks. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. Development plans for the Grand Reserve permitted relocation of nest. Nest has been relocated successfully and occupied by osprey. Developer has complied; a capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. All previous and currently proposed development activity complies with the stated requirements as a condition of plan approval issued by the City. No action required during the reporting year. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation improvement costs in accordance with the applicable revised Development Order conditions. 21 1% i ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; AMENDING ORDINANCE 3205-83, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR PARK PLACE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 3287-83; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT; DETERMINING THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE NOT A "SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION" FROM THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER; DETERMINING THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 3205- 83 (the "Development Order"), which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 3287- 83, an amendment to the Development Order, and readopted Ordinance 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 1991, Building Operation Holding Company, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of Park Place, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"), pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19", Florida Statutes (the "NOPC"), proposing to (i) amend the Conceptual Plan for Park Place to provide for 200,000 square feet of floor area for 4ndustrial use and a reduction of the approved floor area for office use by 300,000 square feet; (i i ) provide a maximum floor area ratio ("F.A.R.") for industrial use; (iii) amend the phasing of the development; (iv) amend all Development Order conditions based on phasing; (v) change the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of road improvement costs; and (vi) extend the build-out date by five (5) years; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 5114- 91, rezoning a portion of the property from "General Office" to "Research, Development and Office Park," and Ordinance 5113-91, amending t-he land use plan designation for the same portion of the property from "Residential/ Office" to "Industrial," consistent with the proposed revised Conceptual Plan for Park Place; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider amendments to DRI's; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has revised the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public; now, therefore, v . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, 'FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction. This ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings. The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance 3205-83, and amended by Ordinance 3287-83, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Building Operating Holding Company has proposed the following amendments to the Park Place Development Order: 1. Revising the Conceptual Plan for Park Place to provide for 200,000 square feet of floor area for industrial use and a reduction of the approved floor area for office use.by 300,000 square feet to 803,000 square feet; is 0.4; 2. Adding a condition that the maximum F.A.R. for industrial use 3. Amending the phasing of the development; 4. Amending all Development Order conditions based on phasing; 5. Changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements which would have been paid concurrently with Phases II and III to a date 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance; 6. Eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and 7. Extending the build-out date by five (5) years. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC") and the Department of Community Affairs, State of Florida ("DCA"). D. The proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor do they create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Amended Application for Development Approval. 2 E. The City Commission has adopted Ordinance 5113-91, amending the land use plan designation, and Ordinance 5114-91, rezoning a portion of the property consistent with the revised Conceptual 'Plan. Section 3. Conclusions of Law. The City Commission, having made the above findings of f.act, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. Development in accordance with the proposed amendments, including the revised Conceptual Plan, will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. B. The proposed amendments are consistent with the land development regulations and the comprehensive plan of the City. C. The proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact, or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, over those treated under the Development Order. The proposed amendments, therefore, do not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Park Place Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. D. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. E. The amendments are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance 4983- 90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. F. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City and Building Operation Holding Company are authorized to approved/conduct development as described herein. G. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order. Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the- above conclusions of law, it is ordered that t7he Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4(A) and 4(1) of the Development Order is amended as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. Section 4(C) of the Development Order is amended to provide that the Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,153,000 square feet, 3 ?i? 2 10 comprised of a maximum 803,000 square feet of office use, a maximum 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use and a maximum 200,000 square feet of industrial use. C. Section 4(C)(1) of the Development Order is amended to provide that industrial use shall have a maximum F.A.R. of 0.4. D. Section 4(C)(2) of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: The Project shall consist of one phase as follows: Phase Maximum Floor Area In Square Feet Retail Commercial Office Industrial Total Phase A 150,000 803,000 200,000 1,153,000 Phase A shall be divided into three subphases as follows: Subphase Maximum Floor Area In Square Feet Retail Commercial Office Al 150,000* 480,000** A2 198,000 A3 125,000 Total 150,000 803,000 Industrial Total 200,000 830,000 198,000 125,000 200,000 1,153,000 *Includes 55,278 square feet existing as of 12-19-91. **Includes 120,560 square feet existing as of 12-19-91. E. Section 4.D. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: The Developer agrees to acquire land, or to pay the City for land required to be acquired by the City, to prov i.de ingress and egress to the west of the Project. Specifically, access to the west shall interconnect with the existing easement at the north end of M & B 19-1, 20, 20-1 and 20-1A (Bennigan's, Chi Chi's and Perkins) to the U.S. 19 frontage road and through the Bennigan's site to the existing traffic light at State Road 60. Aeess-h°" be prayided State Read 60, with t-he-exirE-t-r$C-a-t}on-t9-be-detcrir'rrrc?c'rt-rrmc of Area 44ar-y site plan appre?oa4 for T#as T Said ingress and egress shall be secured by fee simple acquisition, right-of-way easement, or other appropriate mechanism by either the Developer or the City. if r- e gtl- s i t }en e a n n e c-be=a G G 8 FR P! rS h ed?y t h e-D e `re-l e per en terms aeeeptab4e--te the ge,?eleper, then epeR written -request of the geioeleperg the-City- agrees to the-uti l iEa ian-o•f its-eifliTrcent de{Aa•4f} 4 /L/ a -,? / peers under Ohapter-73, Florida Statutes to acquiresuG# r4ght-ef-way. Tim-G4y agrees is execeise saeh eiHinen paweF5 Tel-under Ghaptep-73, F-ler-i sa Statutes, if , wa h 4 n -twe;?-(T2 ) mot 5 alter the-ea~ f ee tom-date-e f th 4 s Or-der-, ---eee en ?ee,Rss-i s-tefltwith the }eawe-pry-i-s-i e of law, in r tYtitt 4 4s 4 the '-public int'e•e4+ that sweh 4ngres5 and egress be ebta4ed. !A the -event that thee-G4ty - e exeFeises--mss-pe?weF of ern4nent dama i n to aequire is 4n an- -ef the-abeye ref ere^eed p Feperty fer-i rig Fees- and egr, the-De,.,eaeper shall eeFRpeH5_;*_e the City --ice-th e-am e d n t-ef the e e„semea-t 4 e n j u meAt-em a ep t-w h ere- bi e h judgment exeeed3 the -appraised lee er-average of ppim ; sed a l ues eeteFed inte evidenee-in the edin„ by the G 4y, sent ?T of t#e--Gi tj+-and t?l e-De? e,eFer-s#a•U ; sub vjc c-?te the -,T,w+ cua4 T ? ee?,nncr??- the City acid the Deye leper- as to the 94 the judgment, hare equally -(58-pereent-eae-h) the ameunt of-tai judgment awarded in - zees s e f s u c h app r a i 5 ed v as -er a,+eragevaluee= The cost of constructing such connection to the adjoining property to the west, in addition to any other contributions for on-site or off-site road improvements, will be the responsibility of the Developer according to a schedule to be established with the preliminary site plan approval of Subphase Al Phase 1 (This access has been acquired-and constructed.] F. Section 4.E. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subphase Al Phase 1, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improvements. [Substantial revision: see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] 1. At the U.S. 19/Drew Street intersection construct a grade-separated interchange. This improvement has been committed to in the current Florida Department of Transportation Adopted Five-Year Work Program and is scheduled for Fiscal Year '95/'96. In lieu of the funding commitment or the proportionate share of the construction cost, the following commitments may be made: a. Extend Druid Road between Belcher Road and Edenville Road. The completion of this improvement will provide a parallel reliever access for State Road 60 and Drew Street. [This improvement has been completed.] b. Extend and widen Drew Street as a four-lane divided link (four through lanes and turn lanes as are appropriate) between U.S. 19 and McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement has been completed.] ??_/ C112 -`5i/ c. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy after the development generates 525 p.m. peak hour net external vehicle trips, the Developer shall provide up to $125,000 to the Florida Department of Transportation for the construction plans of the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated interchange. [As of 12-19-91, the development generates 296 p.m. peak hour net external vehicle trips.] These funds shall be provided in order to obtain a commitment for the construction of the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated interchange during Subphase A2. 2. Construct access points to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 3. At the S.R. 60/Clearwater Mall Drive II intersection construct two eastbound to northbound exclusive left turn lanes. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 4. Install or renovate, as appropriate, traffic signals at the south project entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [This improvement has been completed.] 5. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersection with Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pur.suant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements are under construction.] 6. Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U.S. 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. [This improvement is under construction.] 7. At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an additional through lane and additional exclusive left and right turn lanes on all approaches. The through lanes shall be continued to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improvements. 6 8. At the U.S. 19/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an eastbound to southbound exclusive right turn lane and in the westbound direction construct one additional exclusive left turn lane. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of this improvement. 9. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane divided arterial from U.S. 19 to N.E. Coachman Road, and-add turn lanes at all signalized intersections in between. This improvement is committed to in the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program as being constructed in Fiscal Year 1992-93. G. Section 4.F. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subphase A2 Phase 11, commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the construction of the transportation improvements: [Substantial revision; see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] At the U.S. 19/N.E. Coachman Road (S.R. 590) intersection construct a grade separated interchange, provided, however, such facility shall not remain a condition of approval if TBRPC's transportation policies are amended or the Developer, at the initiation of Subphase A2, agrees to prepare and submit traffic condition information documenting that the improvements are no longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. H. Section 4.G. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subphase A3 P-hase!I!funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost *of construction of the transportation improvements. [Substantial revision; see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] 1. Construct additional access to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. These improvements are to be made in phases as is appropriate, but in their entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. [These improvements are completed- except for Drew Street and the north project entrance, and Drew Street and Hampton Road.] 3. Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane divided link (two through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by Subphase A3. The cost of this improvement shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. This improvement is scheduled by! the City of Clearwater for its '92/'93 Fiscal Year. = 4. At the U.S. 19/Sunset Point Road intersection construct a grade separated interchange, provided, however, such facility shall not remain a condition of approval if TBRPC's transportation policies are amended or the Developer, at the initiation of Subphase A3 agrees to prepare and submit traffic condition information documenting that the improvements are no longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. I. Not later than 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance, Developer shall pay to the City the sum of $383,393.00, together with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from December 8, 1983. This payment, together with the previous transportation mitigation payment made pursuant to the Development Order, is in full satisfaction of Developer's obligations under Sections 4.E.2 through 4.E.5, 4.E.7, 4.E.8, 4.G.1 through 4.G.3, and 4.Z of the Development Order as amended by this ordinance. J. The bu i 1 d-out year i s hereby extended by f i ve (5) years through 1996. This results in an extension of the build-out of Phase I by 11 years, from 1985 to 1996; an extension of the build-out of Phase II by 8 years, from 1988 to 1996; and an extension of the build-out of Phase III by 5 years, from 1991 to 1996. K. Section 4.1. is hereby repealed. L. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. 8 5_i y,2 - ,? M. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. N. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days following the effective date hereof, to Building Operating Holding Company, DCA and TSRPC. 0. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the Department of Community Affairs and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. P. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in. Section 380.06; Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 45 days after copies have been transmitted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED AS AMENDED Attest: November 4, 1991 December 19, 1991 X t7 ??/ Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner l nt ;o au C Y City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbrait J . City Attorney I hereby certify that thic iq a true and correct cope of tfie ori". a% it g appesrs to the tiles of the City of (.le.,ru-ater. \\'icnc» n,y hand and officwl seal of the Ciry of Clear-water. sd^ day of ?? •, a.c r 1 ?Z. LEGAL DESCR!PT:0.1 OF ?'rK ?LAC' CG--Ante at t~e center of sec: cn 17, c-.,nship Z9 SCutlh, Rance 1-6 east, Pine11?s Ccu-ty, F?Crida and go 5 c5°=6'01" W, 660.00 faet, alcng the Scu,t:i tountary of tie Nort`•..est 114 of said Section 17 Cthe East-'west cantarline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°:9'21" W, SO-00 feet, to a point an tie Ncrt'i -igtt-ef--.ray line of Gulf-to-Eay Boulevard - State 3Cad E0 for a PCINT OF 6EGj!,,,,jpG; thence, following said Nort?i r is:it-of- C e=5r ,1 ar f o- rSEt? W :-.'J.00 may line, S_= Ol. , 3.=9 feet; ?5enca t? 00 ?_ , feet; :hence S 2S°46' O1" W, 1:'.21 feet; thence, leaving said !;or=h r4gnt- of-•-ay line, N 01r'04'0411 E, 599_ SS feet; thence 5 E9°=6' 01" 4, 122.13 feet; ?:e.-.C2 4 0(i'*_=Z' Z1" E. CCd. 70 feet.; t:?enee S Z'S*54' 49" W, 400-06 feet, t7 a ;.'dint on t:%e Zast right-=f-way line of U.S. 11s"`?cy 13; !%enca, `01'_ i -W ng Sa ; e. ..St r' C..tt-=`..ay 1 i ne, N Ol'"+4' ?4" .C., 22-15 feet; .~e..CZ zlcng a c_-.,e :o :`e right V%zz `is a rzC= us of 12Z.00 feet, an arc length of 72. ZZ feet_, a c~crd l enq -,.?: of 72-19 feet, a c::or_ of 0 N C„ t::e!'fCa V cr.°-/'EJ" o, 1-_52 fcet; t?:=nC= a1Cng a r•.-'!2 t.7 :he j eft t.`.at has a -adi us of 222.= feet, an arc 1 enq-_~ of _r?. -_Z feet, a C`CrC ?en_::? O` =c. - `Zet, a -...,r_ to=r=ng a," i4 ZG`5_' Z/" =, __ a :Ol ]t Cn =e .';Cr:41 toundar-J, of V: e Sout:..•..est L14. of tie Ncr::west :./- of said Sztt'on 17; t.`.anc:, leaving said =:st ri gnt-of-way' 1 i ne of J. S_ Hi g!?•-ay =? r y =Co?`'r d•?" ., ?L?.. d -e _t, a, Cng tie ';C-:.`7 t^.2:ndary of t::e Scu-' i-st 1a'" o' the ?:c-.?_2st :/4 of saiC Se.:-:=n =7 :o t::e _cu=.`.-west _Crnar of Vie ::crt`.e_s . :.'= of ..`.e ycr.-?zst :./_ of said Se. _. cn :: t'erc= :t foe=, a, ;r.y t :-:a ?zst ,.....dory! _ :.`.e `or _. asst c` :.`.e tic. =.._2st _'4 of SEC=.::7 -! :z -:..`.e Nc-:.`-est _=--er sa:d 5 °_S`Sa' ?" _ ?S °auT a!-Cng .`e Nz-r-_:: j Jf Sa:.r. a' t?:e Nor::wes_ - a ;.a in, t on the ==st -'gn=-=f--- ay ' .ne =f .t=n ;cad - Cc_.,tf =cad _-; t.'-anc_ S :0'13Z--" G_-%. 71 fact, aI7n7 said 'Aevz t.?Iancz S BSc-6' .JZ., W, CZ7. 00 f2°_ t; t`a^e_ S 00*10' 21" E. ZBO. CC f eeT, t.`.a ?0_`NT OF EE_:;C- , c=n:.=: -i ng oe. ac--s , -cre or i ess. Su=_ec: __ ease.-e a,:C of r=t=r=- info-ati cn t= kan f-=-s su--!ey 'zy L' cver_s , 2aur b Stavens , __nSu i t'. ng Eag-ne_rs-'_=r.C S.-leycrs, C'ea:--atar, r'_. :ca, Z=, _SSZ_ 1 LEGEND j I OFFICE 803.000st i COMMERCIAL 150,00051 I INDUSTRIAL 200,000st I I PROPOSED ACCESS j (EXACT LOCATION OF ENTRANCESIEXITS TO BE DETERMINED OURING =+NAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL) ' I o I ?a _.-.-.-....? F1 I IIQ°• SR 60 NGTES. •v MAXIMUM OF 2 OUTPARCELS MAXIMUM OF ) OUTPARCELS © ACCESS FROM SR 60 SUBJECT TO FOOT APPROVAL 7 :eo 100' I, 3i i I I TO-BAY BOULVI RO Al ,7 RW /-\,( -FE--:- K/^o Eno-61-9 ••••??•?•• ^?- AMENDED MASTER DEVELOPMENT Y! Acv July 30. T••I EXHIBIT -B- (REV. 12/19/91) 1 b ?ha{ Z,) ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83 AS AHFNUED BY OR9I11AHCE NO. 3287-83 Aii Ui?DIIJA?JCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, REIJDE'RI IG A 0EVELOPHEWT ORDER PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, ON A PJ APPLICATION FOR DEVELOP T APPROVAL FILED BY I1?Tf?0 DF.VFLOPMENT CORPORATION FOR ;AR: PLA A DEVELOPI-LENT OF rFGIO?,AL Ii1PACT; PROVIDING FIiJDI11GS 0 ; PROVIDING C011CLUSIOIJS OF 1.A':J; EIiUMERATING THE CONDiTIOiJS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORUER; PROV1UI'JG FOR ADMIN I STRAT ION OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER; PROV I D I iJG FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HE P,FIJITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR THE SEPARABILITY OF THE PROVISIOfaS HF_RI:OF; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSFO ENACTI•IENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORD111AIJCE . JHEREAS,.on July 16, 1982, Metro Development Corporation ("Developer") filed an Application.for Developoent Approval of a Development of Regional Icspact ?1)nlwith the City of Clca rwater Citythe Tanpa P,ay regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), the Florida Depart;:ient of Community Affairs ("DCA") and other state, regional and local agencies, pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.0, Florida Statutes (1981); and ;HEREAS, on October 11, 1932, the Developer fil,:d ;i t11 =he City an A'.iend,!ient to the Application for Devele;iVrft Approval and submitted copies of the Amendment to all appropriate agencies; and ,JHEJ,'EAS, the Application for Development Approval, as amended ("ADA"), proposes the development of Park Place, a 99 acre planned retail and office complex in the City of C1 ear rater near the intersection of U.S. Highway 19 and State Road 60 (herein sorretines referred to as "Park Place" or "Project" ) ; and 111HERFAS, the City Co:-,lmi ssion, as the govt-rni ng body of t)L, local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Section -380.06, Florida Statutes, is authorized and er:rpov+ared to consider applications for development approval y for develop;!rents of regional impact; and 1 1JHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Section ) \.380.06, Florida Statutes, have been complied r+ith; and l -1- ?L i t WHEREAS, the City Con,i,ii ssi on has received and considered the report and recornriendation of the TBRPC; and i;HER'r_AS, the City Coinmission has on August 18, 1983, held a duly noticed public nearing on the ADA and has heard and considered ,testimony and documents received thereon; and 1,1HEREAS, this Development Order, when adopted 0 11 constitute a land development regulation applicable to the property; and WHEREAS, the Local Governe-ient Comp reliensi ve PI anniny Act ("LGCPA") requires that all development regulations and amendments thereto related to an adopted coniprehensi ve pl an or el ement thereof be revi evied by the Local Planning Agency ("LPA") for conformance ??ith plans adopted pursuant to the LGCPA; and WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Planning Council (PCPC) has been designated the Local Planning Agency for Pinellas County and the PC PC has adopted guidelines Frith re feren:a to such required referral process; and :,'HEREAS, this Ordinance has been referred to and ,vi11 be duly considered by the PCPC under said process; and WHEREAS, the City Conmission has reviewed and considered the above referenced documents, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, now, therefore, BE IT OROA1NED 5Y Ti1E CITY M111ISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARiIATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - That this Ordinance 0 a11 consti tute the Devel oar:lent Order ( "thi s Order" ) of the Ci ty Corn;iissioil issued in response to the ADA filed by the Developer for development of Park Place, a development of regional impact. The scope of development to be permitted pursuant to this Order shall be as hereinafter set forth. r = Section 2. Findings of Fact - That the City Commission, having received the above-referenced documents, and having received all related comments, t?? stinony and evidence submitted by each party and nei,ibers of the general public, finds there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Developer proposes tile development of Park Place, a 99-acre retail and office complex in the City near the intersection of U.S. Highway 19 and State Road 60. B. The real property which is the subject of the ADA (the "real property") is legally described as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by reference nade a part hereof. C. A major portion of the real property was the subject of a request for annexation to the City according to the terns and conditions of an Annexation Agreement approved at public hearing on July 15, 1982, and recorded in 0. R. 3ook 5397, pages 2022 through 2031, inclusive, of tle Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Said ;annexation Agreement is anended and restated in its entirety in the First Anended and Restated Annexation Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference nade a part hereof. Said annexation and First Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement are effective immediately prior to the adoption by the City of this Order. D. The City Cormnission in approving the Developer's on gi nal Anne.;ati on rkgreeraent on July 15, 1982, imposed the following conditians on Park Place ,`;hich wi11 be satisfied in the process of site plan approval con- sistent with this Order: -3- 1. The following naximum floor area ratios ("FAR") be established: (a) Maximum FAR of .25 for retail commercial use. (b) Maximum FAR of .30 for low-rise office use. (c) Maximum FAR of .40 for mid-rise office use. 2. Conveyance by deed(s) for the following additional rights-of-way: (a). Along the southern boundary of the Project fronting on State Road 60, ten (10) feet of right-of-.ray, as may be required to establish a full sixty (50) foot one-half right-of-way. (b) Along the northern boundary of the Project frontino on Drew Street, fifty (50) feet of right-of-way, to establish a full fifty (50) foot one- half right-of-way. 5 . The Developer submitted to the City an ADA, supplenen*_al documentation on traffic systems management ("TSIH") and a sufficiency response-, which are attached hereto as conposite Exhibit "C", and by reference made a part hereof. F. This Project rill yield positi -ie economic i,mpac*_s to the City and Pinellas County, in the fors of construction expenditures, (approximately Sa1.1 million), employment opportunities, (approximately 4,000 pernan'ent jobs) and ad ialorem 'axes, (?pproxi;.a'e1;, S1.3 million annually). ?. nl s ProjaC _ 'all i y i e1 JA .l'!? i m p a c _s ) n e 1 e x i sting road svsten es'3bl i shed a,-id ma ;n.ai ned 5y the City, Pinellas County and :he S-_3 -.e of Florida; -+hich read •?does not at present ,erase in r 311 cases at a desir?ble ieve Hof $??vj?e LDS') 2 /0 a? e a? y e _-T- v I - _ - - - 60 from U.S. 19 to HcHu11en-Booth R This improvement is currently rammed in the Florida Oepartme - f Transportation ("FOOT") F1ve Ye ork Program with construction Point Road from Keene Road-to U.S This improvement is currently grammed in the Pinellas County , Transportation Impro•iements Program h construction scheduled to start in Et1 Belcher Road and cdenviIIe Road wi' con- struction scheduled to sty in 1x33-s34, consistent with _ s identified in the City's Thorvuc re Plan to pro ride parallel reliever •1-- ^ r3 C --?'^^TS-t - .. , ?L-?- _ ; y i .1 - ?. f •i '7 `3 t a forty (40) foot right-of -gay easement alp _ the U.S. Highway 19 corridor in connectip with annexation, site pla>aand subd' ision plat approval, the purposuch additional right- of-way being to as re the availability o; he necessary ri_ t - of -way for ultimata improvement of the U Highway la corridor consistent ,ith _he J C • n - 3 The Project development is not located in an area ' of critical state concern as designated pursuant to Sec_ion 380.05, Florida Stat:ates (1181). The rojecIt 'gill not unreason i nterfere +i _h t e ie e m e _ of he sec yes ny p_ed state a d de?9i arm . , c I. The Project will not unreasonably interfere with the achieve,-.rent of the objectives of any adopted state land development plan(s) applicable to the area. J. A cooprehensive revieyi of the iygpacts generated by the Project has been conducted by the City and the TBRPC. K. This Order is consistent with the report and recom- mendations of the TBRPC. L. The City has established land development regulations, including zoning, approval of building permits, site plan review and subdivision regulations, and pursuant to these land development regulations, has the necessary and adequate authority to monitor, administer, and enforce the provisions of this Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - That the City Ccm!.iission, having -made the above findings of fact, reaches the fol 1 o%.,i ng conclusions of law: A. That these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable lav,s and regulations, and based upon the record in this proceeding, the Developer is authorized to conduct development as described herein, subject to the review procedures, requirements, conditions, restrictions and limitations set forth herein. B. That review by the City reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Section 330.05, Florida Statutes, within the terms and conditions of this Order. Section 4. Order - That, having made the above findings of fact and dra?rn the above conclusions of la.i, it is ordered that the ADA is hereby approved, subject %to the fol l okii ng r?ivie,r procedures, requirements, conditions, restrictions and limitations:- -5- ?r C A. Development shall be approved consistent with the a. Conceptual Plan included as Exhibit "D", attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof, and according to the site plan review procedures and criteria, as .cell as all other applicable provisions of the City Code of Ordinances. In particular, a prelij,rinary site plan s`ial1 be subiritted for each phase, and individual final site plans within the respective phases shall be consistent therewith. Development of out-parcels indicated on the Conceptual Plan shall be consistent with said plan and all out-parcel development will be subject to site plan approval procedures and shall be coordinated .;ith the overall Park Place devel opnent. Perini tted rnaxi !ruPn floor areas for Park Place are considered to be inclusive of out-parcels both as to total project floor area and floor area by phase. All development pursuant to this Order s;iall be con- sistent r•ii th appl i cabl e land d_?vel opiient arid 5ui 1 di ng regulations, codes, ordinances and policies i:1 effect at the time of application f-Dr final site plan approval for the respecLi ve co!nponents of the Project. i;o amendment of any such regulation, code, ordinance or policy adopted subsequent to the effective date of this Order, however, shall preclude, or require any -:1aterial revision of, the type of use or amount of floor area as set forth in the Conceptual Plan. C. The Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,253,000 square feet, comprised of a Maxinum 1,103,000 square feet of office use and`a naximum 1!0,000 square feet of retail co;;;,;ercial use. The 1)crini tted naxinu-n fl oor area is to be approved subject to the FAR and phasing limitations set forth below: -5- 1. The r,raximum permitted floor area by category of use shall be approved only to the extent that such floor areas are consistent with the follo,ririg FAR's and at no time during the approval of individual final site plans shall the cumulative FAR exceed those set forth Selow: Retail Commercial - maxii-qu1r FAR of 0.25 Low-Rise Office (3 stories or less) - r;raxirrum FAR of 0.30 Mid-Rise Office (4 through 8 stories) - rnaximu:n FAR of 0.40 2. The Project phases shall be defined as follows: Phase itaxirnum Floor Area - In Sq. Ft. Retail Commercial Office Total Phase 1 150,000 480,000 630,000 Phase II ---- 323,000 323,000 (Phase I and II cumulative) (150,000) (303,000) (953,000) Phase III ---- 300,000 300,000 (Phase I, II and III (150,000) (1,103,000)(1,253,000) cumulative) Total 150000 _ 1, 103.000 1,_253000 D: The Developer agrees to acquire land, or to pay the City for land required to be acquired by the City, to provide ingress and egress to the viest and to the south of the Project. Specifically, access to the west shall interconnect with the existing ease rent at the north end of H&B 19-1, 20, 20-1, and 20-1A (Bennigan's, Chi Chi's and Perkins) to the U.S. 19 frontage road and through the Bennigan's site to the ^xisting traffic light at State Road 60. Access shall be pi-ovi ded %to t+re south through il,?B 21, 21-1, and 22-1 (,1cHullen Property) to State Road 60, with the exact location to be deter,iined at tine of preliminary site plan approval for Phase I. Said ingress and egress shall be secured by fee si?ple acquisition, right-of-way easement, or other appropriate mechanism by either the Developer or the City. If -7- acquisition cannot be accomplished by the Developer on terns acceptable to the Developer, then upon vrritten request of the Developer, the City agrees to the utilization of its eminent domain powers under Chapter 73, Florida Statutes to acquire such riyht-of-.ray. The City agrees to exercise such eminent domain powers solely ender Chapter 73, Florida Statutes, if necessary, within twelve (12) i9onths after the effective date of this Order, consistent with the applicable provisions of law, in recognition that it is in the public interest that such ingress and egress be obtained. In the event that the City so exercises its power of eminent domain to acquire rights in any of the above referenced property for ingress and egress, the Developer shall compensate the City in the amount of the condennation judgment; except where such judgment exceeds the appraised value or average of appraised values entered into evidence in the conde-anation proceeding by the City, the City and the Developer shall, subject to the .nutual consent of the City and the Developer as to the reasonableness of the judgment, share equally (50 percent each) the amount of the judgment awarded in excess of such appraised value or average values. The cost of constructing such connections to the adjoining ;property to the west and to State Road 60 to the south, in addition to any other contributions for on-site or off-site road inprove-aents, will be the responsibility of the Developer according to a schedule to be estab- lished with the preliminary site plan approval of Phase I. -9- E. Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for 4T Phase I, funding commitments for construction from the govern,,iental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be nade in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improve- vents. 1. At the U.S. 19/S.R. 580 and U.S. 19/Countryside Boulevard intersections construct a grade-separated interchange. This improvement is currently pro- grammed in the Pinellas County MPO Transportation Immprovenent Program (construction to start in FY 1935-87). 2. At the U.S. 19/Drew Street intersection, reassess the existing green time signal phasing. This reassessment is to be done by the City within the Y"I 1983-84 work program of the Traffic Engineering Department of the City. Kok 3. At the U.S. 19/Roosevelt Boulevard intersection, construct a grade-separated interchange. This Y"/ ioprovement is currently progra;nmed in the Pinellas County 1MPO Transportation Improvement Program (con- struction to start in FY 1985-85). n° 4. Construct access points to Park Place on ,Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improve- S - inents shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4-.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these ii,iprove- r,ients and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improver:ients. -9- 5. At the S.R. 60/Clearwater Mall Drive II intersection construct two eastbound to northbound exclusive left turn lanes. The cost of these irnproye;oan_ c s!a>> ?-e the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these ioprove!nents and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these i in provements . The Ci ty coroin i is that i t wi 1 1 1 et fo r bid these improve:Ients no later than t?relve (12) months from the effective date of this Order with a scheduled construction completion date no later than ttienty-four (24) months from the effective date of this Order. i. Install or renovate, as appropriate, traffic signals at the south project entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these i-iiprove- ments and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 7. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersection with S r001 ?7? Haripton Road. The cost of these i,nprove;nents shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. S Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these i:n;irovements and the City shall assume the responsibility for%constructing t;0ese improvements. 8. Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U.S. 19 to Plc Mullen-Booth Road. This iirprovernent is currently programmed in the Florida Depart-nent of Transportation Five-Year Work Program with con- struction scheduled to start in 1986-87. -10- 9. Construct additional lanes on Sunset Point Road from Keene Road to U.S. 19. This improvement is cur- rut rently prograi-, ied in the Pinellas County HPO Transportation Improvement Program with construction scheduled to start in 1906-87. F. Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for p2 Phase II, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the folIoviing transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate snare of the construction of the transportation improvements. 1. At the U.S. 19/Drew Street intersection construct a P? grade-separated interchange. In lieu of the funding -ro I o?? coomitment or the proportionate share of the constructi on cost, the fol l ovri ng commi t-,.ents may be made: a. Extend Druid road bet?..een Belcher Road and Edenville Road. The co-iipleticn of this improvement will provide a parallel reliever access for State Road 60 and Drew Street. The City is committed to this improvement in its 1983-84 work program. b. Extend and widen Drew Street as a four-lane divided link (four through lanes and turn lanes as are appropriate) between U.S. 19 and ;lcl,lul l en-Booth Road. C o n s t r 9 c t i on of Drew Street from Hampton Road east to iiciiul1en-Booth N Road as a two-lane road is currbntly programmed in tide Pinellas County 11.1 PO Transportation Improvement Program with construction scheduled to start in 1983-84. It is acknowledged that the - 11 - foregoing extension of Drew Street that is proyrainraed by Pi nel 1 as County h1P0 wi l l not satisfy the need for a four-lane divided link between U.S. 19 and 1.1c:1ulIen-Booth Road. The City has assumed the responsibility for those improvements beyond those coai:nittcd --nd pro- grammed in the Pi nel 1 as County i•1?0 Transportation Improvement Program. C. Pursuant to subsection 4.D. the Developer shall be responsible for the cost of the right-of-way and construction of the ingress and egress to and from the south through ii(IiB 21, 21-1 and 22-1. This ingress and egress will be located so as to maximize the use of Druid Road via Sky Harbor Drive and Seville Boulevard (around the perimeter of the Clearwater Mall). d. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for Phase II, the Developer shall provide up to $125,000 to the Florida Departr-oent of Transportation for the construction plans of the U.S. 19/Crew Street grade-separated inter- change. These funds shall be provided in order J' to obtain a commitment for the construction of the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated inter- change during Phase III. 2. At the U.S. 19/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an eastbound to southbound exclusive right turn lane and in the eastbound and westbound directions 041? construct one additional exclusive left turn lane. Pursuant to subsection 4.7., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of this improvement. -12- 3. At the U.S. 19/Belleair Road intersection, construct an eastbound to southbound exclusive right turn 0? lane. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of this improvement. G. Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Phase ICI, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the follo,ving transportation improvements shall be rude or, in the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportation improve- ments. 1. At the U.S. 19/Bellea.ir Road intersection, convert the exclusive right turn lane into a combination through and right turn lane in each direction on U.S. 19, and construct an exclusive eastbound to LL southbound right turn lane on Belleair Road. The ?T through lanes shall continue to the next inter- section or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improve- ments. 2. At the Belcher Road/Sunset Point intersection, construct exclusive right turn lanes on all approaches, and construct additional through lanes in each direction on Sunset Point Road. The through 7V lanes shall continue to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance +yith proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these improvements. -13- 3. At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an additional through lane and additional exclusive left and right turn lanes on all approaches. The thro.-igh lanes shall be continued to the next -? intersection or some logical terninus in accordance with proper design practice. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of these iiiprove- ments. 4. Construct additional access to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal ( s) !!lay be needed. The cost of these is-nprove- 1 l ments small be the sole responsibility of the P?Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improve- ments and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. 5. On HcSullen-Booth Road, construct additional lanes from S.R. 60 to Sunset Point road as is currently vW_? programmed in the Pinellas County i-1PO Transportation I,lprover.ient Program (construction to start in FY 1984-85). 6. Install and/or relocate additional traffic signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. These improvements S> are to be made in phases as is appropriate, but in their entirety by Phase III. The cost of these iaprovements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improve- ments and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. -14- 7 d 'H . Expan ar.ipton Road to a t~ro-1 ane di vi ded 1 i nk ( t,;o through lanes with turning lanes as appropriate) fro.n State Road 50 to Drew Street in phases related to points of access on Hampton Road, but in its entirety by Phase III. The cost of this improvement P shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. B. At the U.S. 19/Sunset Point Road and U.S. 19/ Coachman Road intersections construct grade separated interchanges, provided, horiever, such facilities shall not remain a condition of approval if TBRPC's transportation policies are amended or the Developer, at the initiation of Phase III, agrees to prepare and submit traffic condition information documenting that the improver;-nts are no longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. H.. The City further agrees to the following: 1. In the interest of recognizing the comnitnents toward road improvements made by the Developer and to provide for the treatment of other developments in a comparable fashion, the City will review and evaluate potential appropriate legislation dealing with local transportation impact fees; 2. The City will cooperate with and expedite, .q`ere possible, the design of all FDOT improvements which are necessitated in part by Park Place, in partic- ular the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated interchange; 3. The City will support as a high priority the early scheduling and construction of a grade-separated U.S. 19/Drew Street interchange; and -15- I. i 4. The City will review and recommend as is appropriate the redesignation of the U.S. 19/S.R. 60 area, including Park Place, as a regional activity ceii ter under the TBRPC Regional Plan. The developer shall, during construction of Phase I of the Project, prepare a Transportation System ilanager)ent (TSH) Plan, ?ihich shall be submitted for approval coincident with the submittal of the preliminary site plan for Phase II of Park Place. The TSH Plan shall be submitted to the City, the TSRPC, the Pinellas County MP0, FOOT and the Pinellas Suncoast Transit A.rthority, as appropriate. The plan of TSM neasures as approved by the City shall be instituted during Phase II of the Project and implemented for the duration of the life of the Project, according to the following: 1. Assure implementation, by a responsible entity, of Park Place worker flex time of sufficient magnitude to divert 11.9 percent of total peak hour vehicle trips projected in the ADA away from the peak hour traffic. neasures to achieve this diversion i,iay include transit incentives and/or lease agreement stipulations, and others as appropriate. 2. Assure implementation, by a responsible entity, of a TSM program of Park Place worker ridesharing, of sufficient magnitude to divert 2.3 percent of total peak hour vehicle trips projected in the ADA away from the peak hour traffic. Incentive measures to achieve this diversion may include preferential parking, and/or coordinating service, as appro- priate. - 1-3- 3. :fissure i:nplementation of a bus incentive jroyram in cooperation with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority that will result in provision of suf- ficient transit service facilities and ridership to assure a diversion of 5.6 percent of total peak hour vehicle trips as projected in the ADA array from the peak hour traffic. Measures to achieve this diver- sion may include adequate headways, bus stops and shelters, employee bus passes, and developer subsidies, as appropriate. 4. Assure imple;rrentation of express bus service of s,ifficient magnitude to effect a diversion of 1.3 percent of the total peak hour vehicle trips array from the peak traffic hour, provided, hori-ever, implementation.of express bus service shall not be required until final site plan approval is requested for the initial portion of Phase III of Park Place. leasures to achieve this diversion shall include adequate headti•rays, bus stops and shelters, employee bus passes, developer subsidies of park Arid ride lots and capital improvements, as appropriate. 5. Actual experience in implementation of the TSM Plan may indicate that the individual rates of reduction vary from those described above. Any such variances shall be considered consistent with this Order, provided that the overall cumulative reduction in vehicle trips is at least 20.3 percent by the end of Phase II and 22.3 percent in Phase III. 6. Ionitoring of the effectiveness of TSi1 prograros shall be conducted biennially starting with sub- iaission of a report concurrent with the first annual report following preliminary site plan approval for Phase II. The monitoring methodology shall be based on generally accepted traffic engineering practice reasonably acceptable to the City and consistent - 17 - :rith the methodology in the ADA. If monitoring indicates that target reduction levels are not being achieved, the City may withold authorization of final site plan approvals requested subsequent to submission of the TSM report for Phase II and preliminary or final site plan approval for Phase 111, until acceptable !mitigation methods are implemented. The City has the right at its expense to require verification from a source other than Developer's consultant, of methods as may be appropriate to assure that an accurate representa- tion of TSA effectiveness has been submitted and may hold a public hearing consistent with the provisions of subsection 5.C. of this Order prior to final site plan approvals requested subsequent to submission of the TSM report for Phase 11 or prior to preliminary site plan approval for Phase III to evaluate the TSM Plan and performance thereunder. J. The Developer shall be responsible for all improvements made on the Park Place site, and for construction and maintenance of all open space, drainage retention, street raedians, street lighting (including the cost of supplying electricity thereto), and access drives and roadways to and through the Project, including access drives across designated land or easements yet to be acquired. The Developer shall be responsible for proper maintenance of all on-site development approved consis- tent with the Conceptual Plan included as Exhibit "D". The foregoing, however, shall not preclude the Developer from offering, and the City from accepting, dedication of any street proposed to be a public street, in which case the City will assume responsibility for maintaining said public street consistent with the provisions set forth in Exhibit "B". -18- K. ,etlands on the site, designated as Aquatic Lands (AL) by the City and as identified in the ADA, shall remain undisturbed by development activities, except as approved by the City consistent with provisions of the AL zoning district and City drainage and retention policies. L. The folloYring measures to control water quality and erosion referenced in the ADA, shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City consistent with established policy including controlled phasing so tldt large areas are not left exposed for long periods of tine, minimal grading, maximum use of existing vegetation, seeding, r,iulching, sodding and safe disposal of runoff. M. The Developer shall institute a program to be developed in con jucti on wi .h the Ci ty to moni for the on- si to water quality in the project drainage system, so that a deterr:ii nation by the City of this project's itipact on nearby receiving waters can be made and adjusted as may be required. N. Paved parking surfaces shall be cleaned/vacuumed periodically as part of a :dater quality maintenance program designed to be consistent with the Source Control Practice section (page 6-10) of the TBRPC approved Stormwater and Lake Systems Maintenance and Design Guidelines. The entity responsible for imple- mentation shall be subject to reasonable approval by the City. 0. All drainage plans shall be prepared in accordance with the 1 BRPC approved Stor;iwater and Lake Syste;?s i•aintenance and Design Guidelines and small be submitted to the City and the TBRPC for review prior to any final site plan approval. All drainage plans will be subject to City approval consistent with City requirements therefor at time of final site plan approval. -19- P. The final drainage system shall include the following recommendations of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Cooni ssion: 1. A stormwater management system with shallow detention ponds with wide, gently sloping littoral zones (1Y:GH vertical:horizontal minimum); 2. Revegetation of constructed littoral zones with native wetland species; 3. Pouting stormwater, whenever practical, via open vegetated swales as opposed to pipes and culverts. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be incorporated into the development as measures to decrease vehicular pollution/emissions, as referenced in the ADA, and shall be a condition of approval of site plans within Park Place. R. Appropriate corrective measures shall be taken to mitigate soil limitations and additional soils testing as is required to accommodate final building construc- tion design as required by the City. S. The Developer shall phase construction so that trees with active osprey nests shall remain in place through the nesting season. If an active nest is removed, with approval of the Florida Game and Fresh dater Fish Commission, it shall be replaced with a suitable nest stand. T. A capture-release program be established for any Gopher Tortoise, Florida Mouse and Eastern Indigo Snake observed on-site during construction, as referenced in the ADA. The release site shall be determined in cooperation with the Florida Game and Fresh `mater Fish Commission. -20- y U. Any historical or archaeological resources discovered during construction will be reported to the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management and that the disposition of such resources be deterc?ined in cooperation with the Division of Archives and the local government with jurisdiction, as referenced in the ADA. V. Site plans shall include provision for preservation and transplanting of as riany tree clusters or individual trees as is feasible and tree preservation measures shall be included as a consideration in site plan approval. W. The Developer shall encourage that energy conservation measures such as building orientation and shading, overhangs, sun angles, and use of renewable energy sources, be incorporated into the Park Place develop- ment. The extent to which cost-effective energy conservation measures are included shall be a consid- eration in site plan approval. X. The Developer, its successors or assigns, shall be the entity responsible for maintenance of on-site wells. Y. The City alone, and where appropriate in conjunction with Pinellas County, shall provide fire, police, EMS, se4erage, refuse disposal, potable water, and other general government services to Park Place. Z. Under subsections 4.E., 4.F., and 4.G. the Developer shall contribute to the City its proportionate share of S ?r the cos t of construction of 15erta1 n traffic improve- inents. Concurrently ?with the certification of the i ni ti al final site plan f or each phase, %the Developer (???? 1 shall p ay to the City the following listed Principal ai.iounts plus interest for each of the listed phases: -21- Phase I: $247,383 Phase II: $222,451 Please III: 5160,942 Said -ay,ients are calculated to be adequate to rover the 'n6 Developer's proportionate share of the future cost of the designated road iiii prover.ients, including inflation. Interest on the principal sum for each phase shall accrue from the effective date of this Order and interest shall be computed at a rate of ten (10) percent per annuin beginning with the effective date of this Order. Payment of the foregoing monies shall constitute tha final and complete payment of the Developer's proportionate share for any and all off-site transporta- tion iinproverients related to the Proiect, except as otherwise provided herein. The City agrees t"nat it will utilize all of the funds paid by the Developer pursuant to this subsection for traffic improvements in the Project's i!?pact area with emphasis on those iriprove- roents identified by the TBRPC's report. Section 5. A. The Developer shall submit an annual report on the DRI to the Ci ty, the TBRPC, the South.vest Fl on da ',Dater Management District, and the State Land Planning Agency on the anniversary of the effect-ive date of this Development Order for each following year until and i ncl udi ng such time as all t,rris and conditions of thi s Order are satisfied or sane has expired`by its term, ohichever is earlier. Such report shall be sub,iitted for review by t;ie City Copimi ssi on to insure cornpl i ante procedures and requirement will apply to the on-going administration of this Development Order: Administration - That tine following -22- with the terms and conditions of this Order. The Developer and TBRPC shall be notified of any City Commission meeting wherein such report is to be re- viewed, provided, however, that receipt and review by the City Commission shall not be considered a substitute or a waiver of any terms and conditions of the Development Order. Each report shall contain: 1. A description of all development activity-conducted pursuant to this Order during the year immediately preceding the submission of the annual report; 2. A description of all development activities proposed to be conducted under the terms of this Order for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the annual report; 3. A statement listing anticipated applications for development approvals or permits required pursuant to applicable regulations which the Developer proposes to subinit during the year immediately following submittal of the annual report; 4. A statement setting forth the name(s) and address of any assignee or successor in interest to the Developer in its capacity as developer of Park Place or any portion thereof; and 5. A statement that all persons have received copies of the annual report, as required under Section 380.06(16), Florida Statutes (1981). It is the intent of this requirement that the submittal of the annual report shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any submittal require:nents for an annual report as promulgated by the State Land Planning Agency. -23- 1 ? , 1 B. Further review pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes may be required if a substantial deviation, as defined in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, occurs. The Developer shall be given due notice of, and an opportunity to be heard at, any hearing to determine whether a proposed change to the development is a substantial deviation. Substantial deviation may occur by failure to comply with the conditions of this Order, other than a failure by the City, failure to follo4 the plans and specifica- tions submitted in the ADA and supplementary information, or by activities which are not comt-.ienced, other than by the City, until after the expiration of the period of effectiveness of this Order. C. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Development Order adopted pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, the City will issue numerous permits and approvals for the various phases of this Project. It is acknowledged that under Section 380.07, Florida Statutes, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has the right to appeal to the Florida Land and dater Adjudicatory Commission any deviation from or amendment to this Ordinance. D. The definitions contained in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1981), shall control the interpretation and LL ? construction of any terms of this Order. As used herein S 6 U the term "commitment" or "funding commitment" shall mean the inclusion of the improvE,rent in any govern,--iental agency's capital improvement program, in but not limited to the FDOT Five Year Work Program and the Pinellas County HPO Transportation Improve;,ient Program or a written representation by the Developer acknowl- edging its assumption of the responsibility for funding and constructing the irprovement. -24- C. This Order shall remain in effect for a period of twenty (20) years from the effective date of this Ordinance; providing ho,yever that a prelininary site plan for Phase I is submitted and approved within one (1) year from said effective date and reasonable continuous progress is made toward the completion of this Project during the duration of this Order. If the Project is discontinued for any consecutive period of two (2) years, this Order shall expire and no further development shall occur prior to the reinstatement of this Order by specific action of the City Commission. The Project shall not be deemed to have been discontinued so long as the Developer is actively involved in Project leasing activities, managing the Project, or operating under an appro ev site plan of the Project. 'clothing herein contained shall be construed as requiring that con- struction activity be engaged in by the Developer within any two (2) year period. 1";ny development activity, wherein plans have been submitted to the City for its review and approval prior to the expiration date of this Order, inay be completed, if approved. This Order may be extended by the City upon the finding of just cause. Nothing in this Ordinance shall deny the Developer, its successors or assigns the right to petition for an amendment to this Ordinance, if the review requirements of the TGRPC are amended significantly in regard to traffic or other regional impacts, if background or site-generatea traffic volumes differ significantly from those projected in the ADA, or if there`is evidence of other changes in conditions revealed during the inoni- toring process. F. This Order shall be binding upon the Developer, and its assigns, or successors in interest. -25- G. Any reference herein to any governmental agencies shall be construed to mean any future instrui.ieritality which may be created or designated as successor in interest to, or which otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of any referenced governmental agency in existence on the effective date of this Order. H. The City Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order, within five (5) days of the effective date of this Ordinance, to the Developer, the DCA and the TBRPC. 1. The Developer shall record a notice of adoption of this Order as required pursuant to Section 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes (1981), and shall furnish the City Clerk a copy of the recorded notice. J. This Order shall be deemed rendered upon transi,-iittal of copies hereof to the recipients specified in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 6. Plan Conformity - The City does hereby certify that the measures contained in this Ordinance are consistent and in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and individual ele,-ents thereof adopted pursuant to the LGCPA and directs tha'- same be forwarded to the LPA for their receipt and appropriate action. Section 7. Interpretation - Completion of scheduled or actual improvements delayed or prevented by extraordinary circumstances outside of the City's control, such as acts of God, small not be considered a breach of this Order. In the event of any such delay the City shall notify the Developer and TBRPC. Acceptance by the City of funding contributions specified in this Order'shall not relieve the Developer of meeting and satisfying the other applicable terms of this Order. Said acceptance by the City shall not preclude the City from amending its land develop- ment or building regulations applicable to this Project so long as said amendments are not administered in a manner inconsistent with this Order. -26- Section 8. repealer - All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. Section 9. Separability - Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdic- tion to be invalid, the sane shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid; provided however that any such finding of invalidity shall automatically authorize the City, the T3RPC, the DCA or the Developer to request a determination under the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes relative to sub- stantial deviation. Section 10. Notice - Notice of the proposed enactment of this Ordinance has been properly advertised in a neospaper of general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 11. Effective Date - The provisions of this Ordinance shall take effect as provided in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 18, 1983 PASSED ON SECOND AND FI14AL READING AND ADOPTED September 1, 1983 AS A'iENDED /s/ Kathleen F. Kelly Mayor-Commissioner Attest: /s/ Luci l l e I;i l l i arns Ci ty C er Ordinance x3287-83 PASSED ON FIRST READINIG October 20, 19S3 AS AMENDED PASSED ON SECOND AID FINAL READING AND ADOPTED October 20. 1983 /s/ Kathleen F. Kelly Mayor-Cor?imi ssi oner Attest: /s/ Mary Sue Larnkin Ueputy City Clerk -27- LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXIi I B I T "D" EXHIBIT "E" Legal Description of Park Place - First Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement Application for Development Approval, As Amended, and Traffic Supplement Conceptual Master Plan for Park P1 ace - Road Improvements, to be Wholly or Partially Financed by Park Place N. 1LXii,3IT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Ccmm._nce at the center of Section 17, Township 29 Scuth, Rance 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and oo S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Rcad EO for a POI11T OF BEGINNING; thence, following said worth right-of- ,?'ay line, S 29°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right- of-way line, N 01`04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89"46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence 5 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East rich t-ofway line, N 01°04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence aler,g a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord ?earing of N 11°56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.53 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 fleet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Ncrthwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-o,`-way' line of U. S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, X22.19 feet, along the ?1orth boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the 14'orthwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1327.33 feet,' along the Vest boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said '1ortheast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89'56'11" E, 1312. 06 feet, alcng the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the nest right.-of-way line of Ham?tcn Road - County Road 14-4; thence S 0019'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said 'Rest right-of-way line; thence S £S°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEG31N?NING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Cleai-,,,ater, Florida, February 23, 1382. A-l.. • i. ,? iii 1 I I ,' FIRST Ai1EIIDED AND RESTATED -TiI Id ATI-C>J <'?C?i t 11 T THIS FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AIJIIEXATION AGkEEHENT is made this day of September, 1983, among the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ("City"), MDC ASSOCIATES 81-A, LTD., a Georgia limited partnership, 1AETRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Georgia corpora- tion, OR ASSIGNS ("Developer"). V1 I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Sidney Colen ("Colen") owns the real property described on Attachment 1. attached hereto ("the Annex Property") and the real property described on Attachnent 2. attached hereto (which real property together with the Annex Property is some- times hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Project Property") which he has agreed under certain circumstances to convey to Developer; and 'WHEREAS, Developer wishes for the Annex Property to be annexed into the City provided that the City agrees to certain conditions relative to the Project Property; and I,HEREAS, the City wishes to annex the Annex Property to be annexed into the City provided that the Developer agrees to certain conditions relative to the Project Property; and WHEREAS, Colen has heretofore filed with the City a Petition for Annexation and Zoning and an Application to Amend Land Use Plan relative to the Annex Property; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 1982, the City and Developer entered into an Annexation Agreement whereby the Project Property may be annexed into the City, which Annexation Agreement is recorded in O.R. Book 5397, pages 2022 through 2031, inclusive, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; and ,1 EREAS, on July 16, 1982, the Developer filed an Applica- tion for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") with the City and other appropriate agencies; and B - 1. WHEREAS, on October 11, 1982, the Developer filed with the City an Amendment to the Application for Development Approval and submitted copies of the Amendment to all appropriate agencies; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made substantial changes to the original Conceptual Development Plan (the "Plan"), attached as Exhibit.C to. the Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer have agreed to other changes in the Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Annexation Agreement relative to the Project Property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties amend and restate the Annexation Agreement in its entirety as follows: 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. Annexation. Simultaneously with the approval of this Agreement by the City, the City shall conclude annexation of the Annex Property. 3. Conceptual Development Plan. Inmediately following the effectuation of the annexation of the annexed Property, the City shall issue its Development Order relative to the Project Property. The Conceptual Development Plan attached to the Development Order as Exhibit "D" shows the general parameters for development of the Project Property. Any development of the Project Property by Developer shall be in substantial compliance with these parameters. All site and engineering plans, building plans, DRI Studies, or amendments or addenda thereto, or other sinilar documents or applications relative thereto, that are submitted by Developer to the City and are consistent with the proposed development as shown on the Plan and as are consistent with the Development Order adopted by the City as Ordinance No. 3205-83 of which this amended agreement is a part, shall be expeditiously processed by the City. 5 - 2. 4. Parkland Dedication. The City's parkland dedication requirement shall be satisfied in full upon the payment by the Developer to an independent trustee designated by the City of the sum of $600,000.00, such payment to be made within five (5) days following the effective date of the Development Order. This sum shall be invested in an interest bearing account as directed by the City.with'the interest. to accrue to the benefit of the City. The developer shall exercise its best efforts for a period of twelve (12) months from the effective date of the Development Order, to locate and acquire, upon terms mutually acceptable to the Developer and the City, a recreational facility acceptable to the City in the City's'sole discretion. In the event that Developer is successful in contracting for the acquisition of such 'a facility, then the City shall authorize the trustee to disburse so much of the funds held by it as may be necessary to close the acquisition contracted for by the Developer for f conveyance to the City. The balance of the funds held by the trustee, if any, shall be paid over to the city. The City may, in its sole discretion, choose to assume any mortgages that may encumber such a facility, or contribute toward the purchase price of such a facility, or both. At any time prior to the Developer contracting for acquisi- tion of such a facility upon written notification by the City to the Developer and the trustee, the trustee shall promptly pay over to the City the funds, including interest, held by it. Upon the earlier of (i) twelve (12) months from the effective date of the Development Order, (ii) the consummation of the acquisition of such a facility or (iii) the payment to the City of the funds held by the trustee, the Developer shall be relieved of any further obligation under this paragraph. B - 3. In the event that the Developer is not successful in contracting for the acquisition of an acceptable recreation facility within 12 months, the sum of $600,000 plus interest shall be paid over by the Trustee to the City.* Prior to approval of the preliminary site plans for Phases II and III of Park Place, the City shall prepare a report describing the recreation lands and facilities or open space lands which have been acquired with the funds provided by the Developer, as -;yell as any unex- pended balance of the funds or interest that has accrued. In consideration of transportation needs in the Project area, the City Commission may elect to use any unexpended parkland monies to-support improvements to the transportation system provided that a minimum of $240,000 (which equates to four (4) percent of the purchase price of the Project Property) be expended for public parkland/open space purposes. 5. Land Use Designation and Zoning. Upon annexation of the Annex Property into the City, the Land Use Plan designation and Zoning Atlas category for each phase thereof shall be as set forth in the annexation, land use plan and zoning ordinances respectively. The portion of the Project Property already within the City's limits shall continue with the same Land Use Plan designation and Zoning Atlas category as in effect on July 15, 1982. Nothing herein shall preclude the subsequent amendment of the Land Use Plan or Zoning Atlas categories or the applicable requirements thereunder, except that developnent shall be entitled to proceed in accordance and consistent with the specific authorization of the Development Order and the City Code of Ordinances in effect at the time of application for final site plan approval. 6. Utilities Service. (a) Sewer. According to Developer's proposed phasing schedule for the proposed development, average daily se.yer service requirements, by Phase and cumulatively, will be as follows: B - 4. • a? PHASE RETAIL (.'1GD) OFFICE OIGD) TOTAL (MGD) 1 .023 .037 .060 II 0 .024 .024 I11 0 .022 .022 TOTAL .023 .083 .106 Because of the magnitude of the proposed development and the length of the term over which it will be in process, City and Developer recognize the need for maximum certainty regarding the availability of sewer service for the proposed development. The City at its cost shall provide sewer service along U.S. Highway 19, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Drew Street, and Hampton Avenue adequate and available for use to serve the Project Property. (b) ',rater. Water service is available to the Project Property from water lines along U.S. Highway 19, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Drew Street, and Hampton Avenue. The projections of average daily water demand, by Phase and cumulatively, based.on the Developer's proposed phasing schedule for the project are as follows: PHASE RETAIL (FIGD) OFFICE ( I-1GD) TOTAL (MGD) I .023 .037 .060 II 0 .024 .024 III 0 .022 .022 TOTAL .023 .083 .106 The sizes of the water lines presently in place are sufficient to service the above described estimated w ater needs of the proposed project. (c) Natural Gas. The City shall at its expense install a natural gas distribution system serving the Project Property where such installation expense can be recovered within a reasonable time based upon projected revenues to be generated by such system. Where gas mains are not located within dedicated rights-of-:iay or easements, easements shall be provided by Developer for said mains at no expense to City. B - 5. 7. Roads and Signs. If Developer constructs roads on the Project Property in general conformance with the design shown on Exhibit "D" of the Development Order and in locations and to specifications acceptable to the City, then City shall accept any such road dedicated by Developer to the public or the City. Developer agrees that if such roads are dedicated, it will agree to maintain all median areas and shall provide reasonable liability insurance to City with respect to such medians. City recognizes the unique nature of.the proposed development and agrees that business identification signs otherwise consistent wit.h City sign regulations-and subject to site plan review requirements, including sign size, design, and location, may be placed and maintained within publicly dedicated right-of-way so long.as no danger to vehicular or pedestrian traffic is imposed thereby. 8. Access Easement. Upon annexation of the Annex Property, the City shall by separate instrument reasonably satisfactory to Developer, grant to Developer, its successors, assigns, guests and invitees, a right-of-way easement in a location and of a design reasonably acceptable to City for ingress, egress, and utilities over and under the real property described on Attachment 3. attached hereto. The term of such easement shall be the maximum permitted by law. The relocation and adjustment of existing facilities within said easement shall be at Developer's expense. 9. Access to Out Parcels. The City agrees not to prevent the right of ingress and egress to the out parcels fronting on State Road 60 provided that a maximum of two (2) points of ingress and egress to State Road 60 shall be permitted east of the main project entryway and a maximum of tiro (2) points of ingress and egress to State Road 60 shall be permitted west of the main project entry. 3 - 6. 10. Development of Regional Impact. Developmnent of the Project Property constitutes a DRI as defined in Florida Statutes, Chapter 380. The City agrees that compliance by the Developer with the provisions of Chapter 380 is in addition to and complimentary to the initial Community Impact Statement ("CIS") prepared for the Project Property by the Developer. The DRI process, constituting a more comprehensive and complete evaluation of project.impacts, supplants and supersedes the CIS wherever the two may be inconsistent and precludes the necessity of submitting any additional CIS for each phase or tract of the project. 11. Remedies. The parties recognize that damages for a breach by either party of the terms of this Agreement or the Developnent Order may be difficult or impossible to ascertain. The parties further recognize that there may be no adequate remedy at law for any such breach. Accordingly, the parties agree that either mandamus, specific performance, or injunctive relief (either prohibitory or mandatory, both te+-rporary and permanent) is an appropriate remedy in the event of breach, whether actual or anticipatory, of this Agreement or the Development Order. In the event of any litigation arising out of this Agreenent or the Development Order, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. 12. Effective Date and Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by the City and the Developer. This ;agreement shall be in effect for twenty (20) years following the effective date of the Development Order. 13. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. B - 7. d r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY v Attr t: /? By ?, it Counter- signature Approved as..to?form and correctness. City Attorney "CITY" Witnesses: RE31 . 27 MDC ASSOCIATES 81-A. LTD., a Georgia limited partnership By General Partner "DEVELOPER" B - 8. N 0 R T H P..RCEL n•.SCRl?TIOi; Begin at the northwest corner of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.;7. 1/4 of section 17, Tcwnship 29 South, Rance 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and co S . 89°-56' -11" E. , 1312. 06 feet; along the north boundary of said N.E. 1/4 of the N.«. 1/4 of Section 17, to a point on the '::est riche-of-way line of Hampton road - County road t:o. 144; thence S. 00°-19'-21" E., 1333.85 feet, alone said •..; Fst right-of-way line to a point on the south boundary ° of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of said Section 17; thence S. 89-54-49" 1328.31 feet, aloe the south boundary of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N. 000-22-28 E., 1337.33 -eet, along the west boundary of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of said Section 17, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 40.477 acres, more or less. SOUTH PARCEL DESCRIPTION: Conence at the southeast corner of the N.W. 1/4 o Section 17, ='owns ip 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas county, `loriEa and go N. 00,-19' -21" W., 330.00 feet; along the east bounaa:y of said N.W. 1/4; thence S. 89°-46'-41"-W., 33.00 feet, to a point on the West richt-of'-:may line of Hampton Road-County Road No. 144 For a feet, alcn Point of Eeginninc; thence S. 89 -W-01" W., 1998.14 -- g a line 330.00 'eet north of and parallel to the south boundary of said N.W. 1/4 of Section 17; thence N. 01°-04-04 E., 229.92 =e?t• hence S. 89°-46'-O1" W., 198.43 fe°t; hence N. , 00°-52' -21" _ . , 05054 .70 feet; thence S. 89 °- 804'-c9" 14. 174.94 feet; thence `N. OO°-S3' -4"t" E. , 125.02 .feet, to a point on the north bounda-y o= the S.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 0= said Section feet, lc .g the north 17 0°... 2349.30 , thence N 8 -54'-49r' , a oouncaries of the S.W. 1/4 and S. % 1/4 of said N.V, 1/4 of Section 17, to a joint on the west r1aht-o=-`r%ay line of a-1_ tcn Road-County 7coad No. 144; thence S. 00°-19'-21" E., 1003.86 feet, along said west right-of-way line, to the Point of Eeg?nn?;-)g. Containing 49.496 ac=es, more or le=_s. - ATTACF-MENT 1 B - 9. . DESCRIP`_'ION: Commence at the southeast corner of the 11.11. 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S. 89°-46'-O1" W., 660.00 feet, along the south boundary of said N.W. 1/4 (centerline of Gulf-to-bay Boulevard - State Road No. 60); thence N. 00°-19'-21" W., 50.00 feet, to a point on the north right-of-Way line of Gulf-tc-?ay Boulevard; for a Point of Beginning; thence, following said north right-of-way line, S. 89°-46'-O1" 1.7.1 58.49 feet; thence N. 00°-13'-59" W., 10.00 icet; thence S. 29°-46'-O1" W., 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said north right-of-,:ay line, n. 01°-04'-04" E., 270.07 feet; thence N. 89°-46'-O1" E., 1371.13 feet, along a line 330.00 feet north of and oarallel to, the south boundary of said N.W. 1/4 of Section 17; thence S. 00°-19'-21" E., 280.09 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 8.533 acres, more or less ATTACF2,ENT 2 B - 10. This property is the City -,jell site property fronting on U. S. t° c,,^',?aV 19 sF,.vice road north of State road 50. ;-.T- accura legal Inscription mutually acceptable to City and Develccer shall he prepared and substituted for this Attachment 3. ATTACHr=I T 3 _ B - 11. EXHIBIT "C" hPPLICATIUIJ FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, AS AMENDED, AND TRAFFIC SUPPLEMENT C - I. EXHIBIT "O" MiCEPTUAL PIASTER PLAN FOR PARK PLACE D - 1. r 1 1 i V?. J I. •: F. .n - Cr_ A COFOa14 A,F ICr:A 11. •1 Of BUS 40 AREA t B.}?a I•. 17- II I i !. I1?, I -- OVT/ 1 OUT FAOCELSI 1'' y' ^ •• .-. ...?. I. ?... i.n,_ ..? w GA.GOf L? I ?l ? ._.-..-r-• 'I Y I. to BAv EJULf\'ARD \ \ % .+!G ••,.., 60 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN I:OTES -- -- - r.?li -- - - --" -- 1. 1H:S IS A COIJCEFTJAL PLAN A'JD IS IJOT 10 BE USED FOR CO!,SIi.UCTION. ;_ '? ,; i -• ----'`?: 2. LOCATIONS OF BJI.DINGS ARE SUBJECT ?- "? _ \'• TO CHANGE. S: PREFERRED PARKING AND BUS SERVICE PROGRAMS WILL BE FURTHER DELINEATED . AS T.S.M. PLANS ARE PREPARED. .i? ; I i •? I ( / ?- I 1 vnloo. E . LS e\ '. 4. PROJECT IT-ILL CO-;S:ST OF THREE PHASES ? \ '• } \\ , ? ? PER THE A.D.A.I PHASES ARE SUBJECT \ O,/? /PHASE ID? TO CHANGE. P?IT h P ? ?@ ? IVletro Development Corporation a?» Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernican, Inc ?f -0.l`6a •1 t. 1. „4 •.,I wl ,. , •1 w, • •?'o ••W uc r ?r C EXHIBIT "E" Road Improvements, To Be 14holly Or Partially Financed by Park Place PHASE I;1PPUVc11EIJT TOTAL (T) OR PARTIAL (P) FUI;UIPlG ------------ I S.R. 60/1.1all Drive, turn lanes I Traffic Signal, S. project entry I Traffic Si nal g Gulf-to-Bay at Hampton I Gulf-to-Bay at Hampton , turn lanes II Extend and widen Drew Street, U.S 19 . to McMullen-Booth Road as provided in subsection 4.F.1.b. II U.S. 19/S.R. 60, subsection 4.F.2. improvements II U.S. 19/3elleair Road , subsection 4.F.3. , improvements II Belcher, Sunset Point Road , subsection 4.G.2. improvements III :Jiden `fanpton, from S.R 60 . to Drew III Traffic signal, Drew and Hampton III Belcher Road at S.R. 60 , subsection 4.G.3. improvements III U.S. 19/Belleair Road , subsection 4.G.1. , improvements Amount of Park Place Contribution, By Phase: PHASE I = $247 383 , PHASE 11 = 222,451 PHASE III = 1-6-0-3942 TOTAL = 1.6.3-0-,776 (plus interest) T T T T P P /p r T T P J/ f) - "V aZ' / fu?? A,?-? - y -k'44?' JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE W. BARNES JOHN T. BLAKELY BRUCE H. BOKOR GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ROBERT M. DAISLEY ELIZABETH J. DANIELS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.* MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. DONALD P. REED DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER AMBER F. WILLIAMS JULIUS J. ZSCHAU *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 37413.95209 October 11, 2000 Via Hand Delivery Gary L. Jones, A.I.C.P. Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Park Place DRI Dear Gary: On behalf of Park Place Land, Ltd., I am submitting with this letter 13 sets of an application for Notification of Proposed Change ("NOPC") to the Park Place DRI. Also enclosed is a review fee check, payable to the City of Clearwater, in the amount of $500.00. The primary purposes of this NOPC are to (i) reduce approved office and retail space; (ii) provide a land use conversion factor for multi-family and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of the DRI; and (iii) extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31, 2003. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding the application to the appropriate reviewing agencies and consultants. CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE NAPLES OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT STREET 100 NORTH TAMPA STREET 975 SIXTH AVE. S POST OFFICE BOX 1368 SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602-5145 TELEPHONE: (941) 435-0035 TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365 TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (941) 435-9992 TELECOPIER (727)462-0365 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Gary L. Jones, A.I.C.P. October 11, 2000 Page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me to discuss the NOPC application. Very truly yours Ti othy A. Johnson, Jr. TAJ/js encls. cc w/encl: Mr. John Meyer, TBRPC (via hand delivery) Ms. Marina Pennington, DCA (via Federal Express) Mr. Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Robert Pergolizzi, A.I.C.P. Mr. Nick Shackleton #223930 v1 - Park Place/NOPC Transmittal Ltr STATE OF FLORIDA RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl, 32399-2100 -(850) 488-8466 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning council, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR., the undersigned authorized representative of PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, the Applicant submits the following information concerning the PARK PLACE DRI development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City"), to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), and to the Bureau of Resource Management, Department of Community Affairs ("DCA")/l /--? 1650 ( ate) Timoth,?'A. Johnson, Jr. Authorized Representative for Park Place Land, Ltd. 2. Applicant: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Phone (305) 860-8188 Fax: (305) 860-8196 3. Authorized Agent: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 4. Location of approved DRI and proposed change: A portion of Section " 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"). 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. The Applicant is filing this Notice of Proposed Change Application to (i) reduce approved office and retail space; (ii) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Parcel 6") for multi-family and/or hotel uses; and (iii) extend the buildout date by three (3) years to December 31, 2003. The following paragraphs describe the proposed changes in more detail. -2- Reduction of Office and Retail Space. A revised Park Place DRI Master Development Plan, Map H, dated September 18, 2000, is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" ("Revised Map H"). As shown on Revised Map H, the land use schedule has been revised to reduce approved office and retail space. The following table provides a comparison of the currently approved land uses and the proposed uses: LAND USE COMPARISON LAND USES APPROVED USES PROPOSED USES NET ' INCREASE/DECREASE Retail/Commercial 150,000 sq. ft. 81,120 sq. ft. (68,880 sq. ft.) Office 635,680 sq. ft.' 404,639 sq. ft. (234,041.00 sq. ft.) Lt. Industrial 200,000 sq. ft. 200,000 sq. ft. -0- Multi-family Residential 390 dwelling units 390 dwelling units -0- Approved office of 795,520 sq. ft. was reduced by 159,840 sq. ft., which was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units, pursuant to conversion factor set forth in Ordinance No. 5722-95. Conversion Factor. The Applicant is requesting approval of a trade-off mechanism to allow the Developer to convert office development allocated to Parcel 6 to multi-family, and/or hotel development. The Applicant proposes conversion factors for Parcel 6 which are designed to balance P.M. peak hour external vehicle trips, based on the results of the Park Place 2000 NOPC Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Florida Design Consultants attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C" (the "Traffic Analysis"). The proposed conversion factors are (i) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.4 multi-family units and (ii) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.44 hotel rooms. The conversion factors are shown in detail on Page 6 of the Traffic Analysis. The converted uses, if any, will be restricted to Parcel 6, which has a land use designation of Residential/Office/Retail allowing office, residential and hotel uses. Notwithstanding the proposed conversion factors, the existing land use plan designation limits (i) the maximum multi-family density on Parcel 6 to 18 units per gross acre, a maximum of 111 units (6.16 acres X 18 units per acre) and (ii) the maximum hotel density on Parcel 6 to 30 rooms per gross acre, a maximum of 185 -3- rooms. The Applicant proposes to set forth these development limitations in the amended Development Order. The development of hotel and/or office will not exceed density or floor area ratios established by the City's Land Development Code. As evidenced in the Traffic Analysis: (i) Any conversion of Parcel 6 development, as proposed, will increase the internal capture and decrease the directional traffic impact as compared to office development of Parcel 6; and (ii) The proposed uses, when fully built, represent a 34.1 percent reduction in PM peak hour external trips when compared to the approved development plan. Extension of Buildout Date. The Applicant requests a three-year extension of buildout of the DRI from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2003. As evidenced by the Traffic Analysis, the proposed extension does not necessitate additional roadway improvements beyond those set forth in the approved Development Order. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The revised conceptual plan for Park Place is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." 6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, please indicate no change. The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart is Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e. any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Chart). The DRI Development Order was originally adopted by the City of Clearwater, Florida, as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983, amended by -4- Ordinance No. 3287-83, adopted October 20, 1983, and readopted December 8, 1983, amended by Ordinance No. 5142-91, adopted December 19, 1991, amended by Ordinance No. 5722-95, adopted January 19, 1995, and amended by Ordinance No. 6107-96, adopted November 21, 1996. Ordinance No. 5142-91 amended the Development Order by (i) adding 200,000 square feet of industrial use and providing a maximum F.A.R. for the same; (ii) changing the phasing of the development from three phases to one phase with three subphases and revising conditions based on phasing; (iii) changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements; (iv) eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and (v) extending the build-out date by five (5) years. Ordinance No. 5722-95 amended the Development Order by (i) modifying the phasing of the Development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; (ii) decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extending the build-out date by four (4) years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; (v) adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; (vi) deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; (vii) restating all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. Ordinance No. 6107-96 amended the Development Order by (i) providing a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 allowing conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflecting certain changes in ownership. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? No. If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Not applicable. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development -5- order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use, and adjacent non- project land uses within % mile on a project master site plan or other map. No additional lands have been purchased or optioned. 9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. No. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. Yes No X 10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. Yes. The proposed buildout date is December 31, 2003. 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. Parcel 6 is designated on the City of Clearwater Future Land Use Map as Residential/Office/Retail, a land use designation allowing retail/commercial, multi- family, hotel and office development. Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended development order, pursuant to Subsections 380.06(15), F.S., and 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code: 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(10)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order conditions and -6- requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, is applicable; d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. A proposed ordinance adopting the proposed change and setting forth the precise language proposed to be changed is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "D." Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H Exhibit "C" - Traffic Analysis Exhibit "D" - Ordinance Exhibit "E" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart 10/11/00 11:56 AM d-1 37413.95209 #103409 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE NOPC -7- EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;), thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 004'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. STATE OF FLORIDA RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FI, 32399-2100 -(850) 488-8466 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning council, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR., the undersigned authorized representative of PARK PLACE LAND, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, the Applicant submits the following information concerning the PARK PLACE DRI development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City"), to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), and to the Bureau of Resource Management, Department of Community Affairs ("DCA"/ 16V1110 (Date) Timoth?YA. JoKhson, Jr. Authorized Representative for Park Place Land, Ltd. 2. Applicant: Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Phone (305) 860-8188 Fax: (305) 860-8196 3. Authorized Agent: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 4. Location of approved DRI and proposed change: A portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"). 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. The Applicant is filing this Notice of Proposed Change Application to (i) reduce approved office and retail space; (ii) provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Parcel 6") for multi-family and/or hotel uses; and (iii) extend the buildout date by three (3) years to December 31, 2003. The following paragraphs describe the proposed changes in more detail. -2- Reduction of Office and Retail Space. A revised Park Place DRI Master Development Plan, Map H, dated September 18, 2000, is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" ("Revised Map H"). As shown on Revised Map H, the land use schedule has been revised to reduce approved office and retail space. The following table provides a comparison of the currently approved land uses and the proposed uses: LAND USE COMPARISON LAND USES APPROVED USES PROPOSED USES -; NET . INCREASE/DECREASE° Retail/Commercial 150,000 sq. ft. 81,120 sq. ft. (68,880 sq. ft.) Office 635,680 sq. ft.' 404,639 sq. ft. (234,041.00 sq. ft.) Lt. Industrial 200,000 sq. ft. 200,000 sq. ft. -0- Multi-family Residential 390 dwelling units 390 dwelling units -0- Approved office of 795,520 sq. ft. was reduced by 159,840 sq. ft., which was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units, pursuant to conversion factor set forth in Ordinance No. 5722-95. Conversion Factor. The Applicant is requesting approval of a trade-off mechanism to allow the Developer to convert office development allocated to Parcel 6 to multi-family, and/or hotel development. The Applicant proposes conversion factors for Parcel 6 which are designed to balance P.M. peak hour external vehicle trips, based on the results of the Park Place 2000 NOPC Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Florida Design Consultants attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C" (the "Traffic Analysis"). The proposed conversion factors are (i) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.4 multi-family units and (ii) 1,000 square feet of office development equals 2.44 hotel rooms. The conversion factors are shown in detail on Page 6 of the Traffic Analysis. The converted uses, if any, will be restricted to Parcel 6, which has a land use designation of Residential/Office/Retail allowing office, residential and hotel uses. Notwithstanding the proposed conversion factors, the existing land use plan designation limits (i) the maximum multi-family density on Parcel 6 to 18 units per gross acre, a maximum of 111 units (6.16 acres X 18 units per acre) and (ii) the maximum hotel density on Parcel 6 to 30 rooms per gross acre, a maximum of 185 -3- rooms. The Applicant proposes to set forth these development limitations in the amended Development Order. The development of hotel and/or office will not exceed density or floor area ratios established by the City's Land Development Code. As evidenced in the Traffic Analysis: (i) Any conversion of Parcel 6 development, as proposed, will increase the internal capture and decrease the directional traffic impact as compared to office development of Parcel 6; and (ii) The proposed uses, when fully built, represent a 34.1 percent reduction in PM peak hour external trips when compared to the approved development plan. Extension of Buildout Date. The Applicant requests a three-year extension of buildout of the DRI from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2003. As evidenced by the Traffic Analysis, the proposed extension does not necessitate additional roadway improvements beyond those set forth in the approved Development Order. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The revised conceptual plan for Park Place is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." 6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, please indicate no change. The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart is Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e. any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Chart). The DRI Development Order was originally adopted by the City of Clearwater, Florida, as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983, amended by -4- Ordinance No. 3287-83, adopted October 20, 1983, and readopted December 8, 1983, amended by Ordinance No. 5142-91, adopted December 19, 1991, amended by Ordinance No. 5722-95, adopted January 19, 1995, and amended by Ordinance No. 6107-96, adopted November 21, 1996. Ordinance No. 5142-91 amended the Development Order by (i) adding 200,000 square feet of industrial use and providing a maximum F.A.R. for the same; (ii) changing the phasing of the development from three phases to one phase with three subphases and revising conditions based on phasing; (iii) changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements; (iv) eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and (v) extending the build-out date by five (5) years. Ordinance No. 5722-95 amended the Development Order by (i) modifying the phasing of the Development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; (ii) decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extending the build-out date by four (4) years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; (v) adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; (vi) deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; (vii) restating all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. Ordinance No. 6107-96 amended the Development Order by (i) providing a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 allowing conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflecting certain changes in ownership. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? No. If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Not applicable. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development -5- order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use, and adjacent non- project land uses within '/z mile on a project master site plan or other map. No additional lands have been purchased or optioned. 9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. No. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. Yes No X 10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. Yes. The proposed buildout date is December 31, 2003. 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. Parcel 6 is designated on the City of Clearwater Future Land Use Map as Residential/Office/Retail, a land use designation allowing retail/commercial, multi- family, hotel and office development. Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended development order, pursuant to Subsections 380.06(15), F.S., and 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code: 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(10)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order conditions and -6- requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, is applicable; d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. A proposed ordinance adopting the proposed change and setting forth the precise language proposed to be changed is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "D." Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H Exhibit "C" - Traffic Analysis Exhibit "D" - Ordinance Exhibit "E" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart 10/11/00 11:56 AM d-1 37413.95209 #103409 v2 - 95434jsPARK PLACE NOPC -7- .- ?. , , ,? ?? =? ? ? "tom 5 c r.? s.?. ? ? 7:x a ?bnr ? i zw?"``? ,?s?*• F .- ?. , , ,? ?? =? ? ? "tom 5 c r.? s.?. ? ? 7:x a ?bnr ? i zw?"``? ,?s?*• F METRO Development Corporation July 16, 1982 Ms. Sheila Benz DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Mr. David Healey Planning Director City of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Avenue Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 Dear Ms. Benz and Mr. Healey: I~? REG101Y,q? TAMPA 6A Y ?: lp Metro Development Corporation is pleased to present this Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval for Park Place. With this letter I am certifying that copies were either hand delivered on this date or sent by Certified Mail to the attached list of reviewing agencies. We and our consultants have made a sincere effort to comply with the information requirements of the DRI process and to provide com- plete and accurate information for your review. We stand ready to respond immediately to any requests you may have for clarification of answers or to assist in any other way to expedite a timely approval process. If questions should arise during the sufficiency review, I would appreciate your calling them to our attention at the earliest possible time to permit us to begin preparing appro- priate responses. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sinc rely yours, MERO DE SLOP NT C PORATION rry olfe Vice President LDW/bw Attachment 4 728 WEST PEACHTREE STREET. N.W. % ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30308 % TELEPHONE: (404) 881-0431 i I DRI APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL LIST r Mr. David Healey, Planning Director City of Clearwater P. 0. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 (25 Copies) Ms. Sheila Benz, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 (12 Copies) Mr. Wayne Lasseter District Planning Engineer Florida Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 1249 Bartow, Florida 33830 Mr. Robert J. Krzeminski Florida Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. William Hennessey, District Manager Department of Environmental Regulation 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33610 Attn: Mr. Gene Sullivan Mr. L. Ross Morrell State Archaeologist and Chief, Bureau of Historic Sites & Properties Division of Archives, History and Records Managment The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. Brian Barnett Environmental Services Office Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission P. 0. Box 1840 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ms. Linda Cannon, Manager Planning and Program Development Division Southwest Florida Water Management District P. 0. Box 457 Brooksville, Florida 33512 METR03:L1 fi DRI APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL LIST (Continued) Mr. Art Wilde Office of Executive Director Department of Natural Resources 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Mr. Leonard Elzie, Chief Bureau of Economic Analysis Department of Commerce Collins Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. James W. May, Chief Department of Veteran and Community Affairs Division of Local Resource Management 2571 Executive Center Circle, E. ?f Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Attn: Ms. Diana Sawaya-Crane Mr. Nicholas Caramalis Area Engineer Corps of Engineers P. 0. Box 19247 Tampa, Florida 33686 Mr. Joe Kubicki Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 Mr. Jake Stowers Pinellas County Environmental Management 315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 7/13/82 METR03:L2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PART I QUESTIONS 1-9 APPLICATION INFORMATION 1-1 QUESTION 11 MAPS 11-1 PART II QUESTION 12 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION 12-1 QUESTION 13 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: AIR 13-1 QUESTION 14 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: LAND 14-1 QUESTION 15 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WATER 15-1 QUESTION 16 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WETLANDS 16-1 QUESTION 17 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: FLOOD PLAINS 17-1 QUESTION 18 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 18-1 QUESTION 19 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES 19-1 QUESTION 20 ECONOMY: EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC C HARACTERISTICS 20-1 QUESTION 21 PUBLIC FACILITIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 21-1 QUESTION 22 PUBLIC FACILITIES: DRAINAGE 22-1 QUESTION 23 PUBLIC FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY 23-1 QUESTION 24 PUBLIC FACILITIES: SOLID WASTE 24-1 QUESTION 25 PUBLIC FACILITIES: ENERGY 25-1 QUESTION 27 PUBLIC FACILITIES: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 27-1 ii METR02:Q r 1 t t ti s t i y r t t QUESTION 28 QUESTION 29 QUESTION 30 QUESTION 31 QUESTION 39 QUESTION 43 APPENDIX I APPENDIX II APPENDIX III METR02:Q PUBLIC FACILITIES: HEALTH PUBLIC FACILITIES: POLICE PUBLIC FACILITIES: FIRE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES: TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS OFFICE PARKS SHOPPING CENTERS LETTER TO CITY OF CLEARWATER TBRPC PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW TECHNICAL APPENDIX TO TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS iii 28-1 29-1 30-1 31-1 39-1 43-1 ? ?"?? ?!°? ?"° ? ice' , ?" , LIST OF TABLES TITLE PAGE TABLE NUMBER 12- 1 Development Phasing Plan 12- 3 12- 2 Existing and Proposed Land Uses 12- 4 13- 1 Cumulative Daily Emissions 13- 2 14- 1 Soil Descriptions and Interpretations 14- 2 16- 1 16- 1 Wetland Acreage 18- 1 Wildlife Species 18 9 20- 1 Construction Phase Expenditures and 20- 2 Employment 20- 2 Permanent.Employment and Payroll by Phase 20- 4 20- 3 Employment Income Distribution 20- 7 20- 4 Estimating Methods and Assumptions for me Projections I 20- 8 nco Employment, Payroll and 20- 5 Ad Valorum Tax Estimates 20-14 24- 1 Solid Waste Generation 24 2 25- 1 Projected Electrical Energy Demand 25- 2 31- 1 Seasonal Traffic Variations 31- 6 31- 2 Levels-of-Service Concept 31-12 CPTA Study Area Service Characteristics 31-17 31- 3 , 31- 4 Transportation Improvement Program 31-20 Mobile Home Park Trip Generation Assumptions 31-22 31- 5 iv 590-298.04 METR03:D LIST OF TABLES (Continued) TABLE NUMBER TITLE . PAGE 31- 6 Mobile Home Park Trip Generation 31-23 31- 7 Park Place Trip Generation Assumptions 31-28 31- 8 Person Trip Generation 31-30 31- 9 Vehicle Trip Generation 31-32 31-10 Transit Trip Generation 31-34 31-11 External/Internal Split for Vehicle Trips 31-35 31-12 Vehicle Trip Length Frequency 31-37 31-13 Traffic Impact Summary 31-58 v METR03:D 590-298.04 ' LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NUMBER TITLE PAGE MAP A General Location Map . 11- 1 MAP B Recent Aerial Photograph 11- 2 MAP C Topographic Map 11- 3 MAP D and F Existing Land Use and Vegetation Associations 11- 4 MAP E Soil Types 11- 5 MAP G Master Drainage Plan 11- 6 MAP H Master Development Plan 11- 7 MAP I Public Facilities and Services 11- 8 17- 1 Letter from City of Clearwater 17- 2 21- 1 Letter from City of Clearwater 21- 2 23- 1 Letter from City of Clearwater 23- 2 24- 1 Letter from City of Clearwater 24- 4 24- 2 Letter to Pinellas County 24- 5 24- 3 Letter from Pinellas County 24- 7 25- 1 Letter to Florida Power Corporation 25- 4 25- 2 Letter from Florida Power Corporation 25- 6 29- 1 Letter from City of Clearwater 29- 2 30- 1 Letter from City of Clearwater 30- 2 31- 1 Street Network Inventory 31- 2 31- 2 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31- 4 31- 3 Hourly Traffic Variations 31- 8 31- 4 1982 Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-10 & 31-11 vi METR03:E 590-298.04 e' i r r t r t r t r t t i 1 1 LIST OF EXHIBITS (Continued) EXHIBIT NUMBER TITLE PAGE 31- 5 1982 Traffic Levels-of-Service 31-15 31- 6 CPTA Study Area Routes 31-16 31- 7 1985 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-24 31- 8 1988 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-25 31- 9 1991 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-26 31-10 Site Approach Distribution 31-37 31-11 Phase I Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-41 31-12 Phase I Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-42 & 31-43 31-13 Phase I Levels-of-Service 31-45 31-14 Phase II Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-47 31-15 Phase II Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-48 & 31-49 31-16 Phase II Levels-of-Service 31-50 31-17 Phase III Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-52 31-18 Phase III Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-53 & 31-54 31-19 Phase III Levels-of-Service 31-55 31-20 Phase I Recommended Highway Improvements 31-60 31-21 Phase I At-Grade Intersection Improvements 31-62 31-22 Phase II Recommended Highway Improvements 31-65 31-23 Phase II At-Grade Intersection Improvement s 31-67 31-24 Phase III Recommended Highway Improvements 31-68 31-25 Phase III At-Grade Intersection Improvemen ts 31-70 31-26 Phase III Site Transportation Improvements 31-77 vii METR03:E 590-298.04 PART 1 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Application for Development Approval Under Section 380.06(6), Florida Statutes PART I. Application Information 1. I, Larry D. Wolfe, the authorized representative of Metro -Development Corporation, hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 22F-2.07, Florida Administrative Code. In support thereof I submit the following information concerning Park Place which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 1102 (date) 2. APPLICANT (Name, Address, Phone) Metro Development Corporation 728 West Peachtree Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308 (404) 881-0431 3. AUTHORIZED AGENT Larry D. Wolfe 728 West Peachtree Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308 (404) 881-0431 4. ATTACH THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PERSONS HAVING FEE SIMPLE OR LESSER ESTATE IN THE SITE. The site is owned in its entirety by Sidney Colen. 5. ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. INCLUDE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE. Commencing at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet along the East- West mid-section line of said Section 17; thence N 00°20'13" W, 50.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING;. thence by the following three courses along the North rightof-way line of State Road 60; S 89°46'01" W, 58.83 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 89°46'01"W, 1319.05 METR02:N1 590-298.06 ?I feet; thence N 01°03'04"E, 600.15 feet; thence S 89°46'01"W, 211.05 feet; thence N 01°03'04" E, 554.13 feet; thence S 89°54'04" W, 389.49 feet; thence by the following four courses along the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19: N 01°03'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence 72.82 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, radius 192.00 feet, chord N 11°55'02" E, 72.39 feet; thence N 22°46'59" E, 11.93 feet; thence 16.14 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, radius 238.00 feet, chord N 20°50'27" E, 16.13 feet; thence N 89°54'04" E, 1222.38 feet along the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°21'32" E, 1337.05 feet along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence S 89°57'40" E, 1312.30 feet along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence S 00°20'13" E, 2337.74 feet along the West right-of- way line of Hampton Road; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°20'13" E, 280.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The afore described parcel of land also being described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of- way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right- of-way line, N 01°04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-ofway line, N 01°04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11°56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89054'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00022'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°1921" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record.' Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. METR02:N2 590-298.06 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AND SIZE. 1 1 As defined under Chapter 22F-2.10 F.A.C. the project is a shopping center and office development. The site encompasses approximately 99.1 acres, and would eventually include a maximum of 460,000 square feet of retail space and 1,500,000 square feet of office space. 7. HAVE YOU REQUESTED A DRI BINDING LETTER OF INTERPRETATION OR VESTED RIGHTS DETERMINATION FROM THE DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06(4), FLORIDA STATUTES? No 8. LIST ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED DEVELOP- MENT. Presently both the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County have jurisdic- tion. Following completion of annexation, the City of Clearwater will have sole jurisdiction. 9. LIST ALL AGENCIES (LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL) FROM WHICH APPROVAL AND/OR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE THE PERMIT OR APPROVAL FOR EACH AGENCY. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (a) Application for Installation of Sewage Collection/Transmission System (b) Application for Approval of Plans and Specifications for Public Water Supply System (c) Notice of Stormwater Discharge Florida Department of Transportation (a) Driveway Permit (b) Utility Permit Southwest Florida Water Management District None required City of Clearwater (a) Subdivision Record Plats (b) Construction Permits for Improvements METR02:N3 590-298.06 ? PCLOTI ""Oft" rtlawt ?rl?aE: Y • ; ' 595/1 t I Oft` 1',T1ltibr{' ti :i ?::.: }:Y1,:::i •:: .! t?}` - - x ''. '.,?.:.1ttr.•r•:i•: ,• •.?;,•,:-aca?a,ra.. ? s ` I s r_. s uNoM? „ a _-- =iMC6or{ X{r 3Ti?r??AMt9;:i:.T.' r 0 i:. •'' K?::s:•:j..•."%`titi:iy..,. 't"sWF r.c.(. Ow" _ - 1 - - - t:t? ?? ?T•a .•AEt.?: a ?\ - a } ais t>. o. w1.01 aNCLOTE xEr:?;,:;;y e. .1 rwl.v' ;, _?^ ` PIN?ELL'AS :C - _ - ,rlt.S. STATE PARK" :: '°? :.T ?i/?7• :'n • „ \i - .- •??w?•'•' :'t.I:r'.: : ?rr`:• iN I ii .??a.? `,r / C. Dam. 'NCLOTE N.TION/ll i.: ?•• :?. .::t•i::1 ?' ?jr- I 1'( AA` C i - _ aAIIIDUFE tlFiuGEi,: ?ti! v.:.i•: ?? _ - _- !i?'!• :?:7i;. ?:. ,i ? t la[oaPO - I • ?? LYDUIO a'OYl p OAS TA ON -SPRINGS I w f ? a 11 br• t Ift.l • ••• • ,•?~? "?''': ?•:, :.J izPON SwrrN43 ?. --_-? ? ••: OtI?aNT10 Y.{aN COY?aCT aPEa ; , ? - _ Zed- ?' T • .?r.:NO.?il'S^* 1 •? ?? I '_. - t .y9yC7r - ',A 25 ••':•' 'w••?••'•':?!':: v' iNA 's} r••;. Vet •?'::::?;:'r ?:SucM J.'l15' A` Q •-_ -?'•?. . ?•:;:'•t;i M;:?.??1.:: •.:i _f111•`.:t:T ??' J',. 55 ? t i 2 ?,? V R I. A- ? s? 031 {:.- ?? :?-V«td,l?•' '1 t7'i:: •• L':s•'rf? !, S PALM- 0 W BO :t•yr+:.;'•' r,•.y"?"?"'.vt .>;T r `>!r ,aa • .r.lh , !at fizS r r •:{t',•t,:?rs'; .C^.r,';'ii;•?•:' h;?hN.•:i..:••it?.=wrh..,?i. 58{ - t? a 7 t ???{•-. t ?•wr. ' P. +• P::•••• f4:10 i:..' J iN V. : ?Y ''•/(n... 1 I - r" •: i:r L•,t,`.??„ ?. ? ,:•rl.?iY?fa'r•'=:?r;'` •^': ? s i ? { «- -_ .: tlj:h? ' tt:•fi\i. 1?j' V' . M _ ?- x /..I:,' IU. ? IT 1 1": ?',•:•ir+^lt,Z w":?? .., •?a•?:Y:i•`asi{ t ? ci t...w ' ? ?. ie:iS,.G_1 mr. "atJ}rr •i; lln, 51 1 ?.?.? ..+, ....: * •?: .::.i 586 j ; '/t?•':? • _ "?"'?" J,rfi, aww•• ?•?.•:?IYITn JA':'f'LL \:N::r:?rh, ^ I la 1.0 Ib IS t. I' . /a3 •R.. i Ptn 14 .!rte: 1{ t7.. • ?t lir• DUNEDIN ::::::•:•:L;• < .jf;?:i;i'•,rf?'?:':vi:is' P ey .-P1! ?j ?. ! ` raJ P,Mwo a rAAWA ?S'.IF:t?Td.r'?:: ?'7t??r.''+.J + ..4° las %wj ) •y.v,-: •.' :': :tip . i...,, ? sm . '? r. ?, y irr%t.^?+=? 595, • •• I • ,aa ;rt.::':•r: • ';.: ? J:\?. - .{. f^ • ? t} rr'4.. ?? ? ? B.•OYww«I •V: t :A C t. •M• ':Jfr ??S. S tL... Q' w. -^ 1•f'f ^••l :+ w ` t 7? irrlo•.,. :, h_rr.• 5 •'.1?~ 1 I ,a ,aa :x \ rrt`f?i;::` 11. U?' -? v ?.?.sa.:. ..,:. ? •? t ? 580 rT..r:..• :mot; ?r:? '#.. ?:..?.-•?•"•Y',`. •.'s .?' .? Mw: .• '"1 1- t" r:?'li I'•• ?. 71 p. -ti "o 'a 'ir:'P' I?q:?','• at?t ua ?:::°.. •v' t S •_ l? t' ,4. •;L' :t: .•? •??' 'ZyJ{•..s•.i.: •j?:. f,F ! ,. I 1, _ w:.lrw Ix' ,'i •`?:i +'?':: j'. /./k1: Is i N' •,9•;' :'is"•? t tl{661Y .s??-, i7. ?i,? ? / ?%• ?3 1 CA•ar ranlno. .•?_ ?' :?: ..VZ• .1•µ: ,- eva ::v.. is-. '`:.:•• _ .. •; i:? }. Jiuwti.+ri. ,mss:: ;1'• - - - -. ^ ?:. M.:. •r -• _ ,y ..,Stawu;rj:'•t•'+i•2:: ...li•?:ii: .•:P.•._. 1..•,,?;.•?. :1: ?... ^trT,,;• -:?.si I ra };.i:t./I ?''••?I:i:. :.','^t;• :Y: S RI 'Al :%z' FT`Y:":? t. `d Ir?'a. as !'586 a? •a iI 565 SAFETY .•a?„?r?.?` .?i•o:::.....^M.•.r.Er• •i..;??+. iw?ll n •4•?.w ilas4.•::,,; :a .;,;..1f`Ci ••?•• •0.:• ?i yjti - N .; Z ?. l - I ... a'i:}! ?t•,wa :J•::•'.?::••' ?`? :'••- , • i ? '?.Yi' Mr.^iw ??. ?' :r .: r.. ^•590A t 1..:. :'u,awwitei,•ut•i.,wry.^; ?'?.:r?r ?!:•',:`:; r:. : . ''`?` s. PROJECT- SITE -•?ti ri:...!LirA'?'-?"S//iI?••••r /aL>.Tr r.I90a ?!'? ?-A.f/??• --?-.?s Y~ ..• >::i•s.(•.:. 60 ^'n:(4vir ?i ?r %:':. «';•r : .: \' !'.:: .-t . _;:s?$ r«... : 3ry..} ;?' •il '•s.; ,.':: ? r.P _ ;... ;. .t•r:l;?:t';!::•:. ::: :, ..?.'•:?•t•;•: ail.t':•`•;:•? 3 CLEARVVATER „ •:' ,+r?:a'''•/' 'ii:i• ?`<.VK 1? _ G ? r 6..t {,_. ?, •:s: :i3 .ri`?':i•. :!.'• :.i.i?t:•??: •''. ??. :? ? 5958: ,. ,x i sr :i;.j;:?,•:+i:::!?i;i•• ::.:..:::.:.: ? _«:r: .r,•:;:::• iii 's 4%i:• :?:z" l •'? _ r. ^?•?:l: i?•• :•rt.. '• .`ts':.r•:: ?•,t:: Vii) :',.:. .c:: .•i ''% ,i:. ` "• ;y:: ^ .t a. lira ••.'.• 1 ?:.?;:..: :i,?'; .; t• :;.•.`.•,•••., ?,r !? ?r .;:.3 :•r::?47:rn^i4'.?!1,. •..rw ?t :7 I:a :St: ?::;.'. t; ?:';ti:..': ?Q ??'•J?•. ':'; 0?'' ••i"?•' ?. t -•.« a. aw ?•Y•:i :?w :?T.tl!Iti?\;, :Yt?v :'r• •s tit: ::..::t:: :;:: :j : - j? ;i .: ;}.„ ?:. :::j(BELLEAIR 59 A 1 .?' *.ti .:i. _ Si:.•.:,1:•? ;"'• r EACH: a. , 'y I • .r: - ..a? ?M:;::4.: a,' - ?:>?.' •::;::? a': GENERAL LOCATION MAP MAP A ? PCLOTI ""Oft" rtlawt ?rl?aE: Y • ; ' 595/1 t I Oft` 1',T1ltibr{' ti :i ?::.: }:Y1,:::i •:: .! t?}` - - x ''. '.,?.:.1ttr.•r•:i•: ,• •.?;,•,:-aca?a,ra.. ? s ` I s r_. s uNoM? „ a _-- =iMC6or{ X{r 3Ti?r??AMt9;:i:.T.' r 0 i:. •'' K?::s:•:j..•."%`titi:iy..,. 't"sWF r.c.(. Ow" _ - 1 - - - t:t? ?? ?T•a .•AEt.?: a ?\ - a } ais t>. o. w1.01 aNCLOTE xEr:?;,:;;y e. .1 rwl.v' ;, _?^ ` PIN?ELL'AS :C - _ - ,rlt.S. STATE PARK" :: '°? :.T ?i/?7• :'n • „ \i - .- •??w?•'•' :'t.I:r'.: : ?rr`:• iN I ii .??a.? `,r / C. Dam. 'NCLOTE N.TION/ll i.: ?•• :?. .::t•i::1 ?' ?jr- I 1'( AA` C i - _ aAIIIDUFE tlFiuGEi,: ?ti! v.:.i•: ?? _ - _- !i?'!• :?:7i;. ?:. ,i ? t la[oaPO - I • ?? LYDUIO a'OYl p OAS TA ON -SPRINGS I w f ? a 11 br• t Ift.l • ••• • ,•?~? "?''': ?•:, :.J izPON SwrrN43 ?. --_-? ? ••: OtI?aNT10 Y.{aN COY?aCT aPEa ; , ? - _ Zed- ?' T • .?r.:NO.?il'S^* 1 •? ?? I '_. - t .y9yC7r - ',A 25 ••':•' 'w••?••'•':?!':: v' iNA 's} r••;. Vet •?'::::?;:'r ?:SucM J.'l15' A` Q •-_ -?'•?. . ?•:;:'•t;i M;:?.??1.:: •.:i _f111•`.:t:T ??' J',. 55 ? t i 2 ?,? V R I. A- ? s? 031 {:.- ?? :?-V«td,l?•' '1 t7'i:: •• L':s•'rf? !, S PALM- 0 W BO :t•yr+:.;'•' r,•.y"?"?"'.vt .>;T r `>!r ,aa • .r.lh , !at fizS r r •:{t',•t,:?rs'; .C^.r,';'ii;•?•:' h;?hN.•:i..:••it?.=wrh..,?i. 58{ - t? a 7 t ???{•-. t ?•wr. ' P. +• P::•••• f4:10 i:..' J iN V. : ?Y ''•/(n... 1 I - r" •: i:r L•,t,`.??„ ?. ? ,:•rl.?iY?fa'r•'=:?r;'` •^': ? s i ? { «- -_ .: tlj:h? ' tt:•fi\i. 1?j' V' . M _ ?- x /..I:,' IU. ? IT 1 1": ?',•:•ir+^lt,Z w":?? .., •?a•?:Y:i•`asi{ t ? ci t...w ' ? ?. ie:iS,.G_1 mr. "atJ}rr •i; lln, 51 1 ?.?.? ..+, ....: * •?: .::.i 586 j ; '/t?•':? • _ "?"'?" J,rfi, aww•• ?•?.•:?IYITn JA':'f'LL \:N::r:?rh, ^ I la 1.0 Ib IS t. I' . /a3 •R.. i Ptn 14 .!rte: 1{ t7.. • ?t lir• DUNEDIN ::::::•:•:L;• < .jf;?:i;i'•,rf?'?:':vi:is' P ey .-P1! ?j ?. ! ` raJ P,Mwo a rAAWA ?S'.IF:t?Td.r'?:: ?'7t??r.''+.J + ..4° las %wj ) •y.v,-: •.' :': :tip . i...,, ? sm . '? r. ?, y irr%t.^?+=? 595, • •• I • ,aa ;rt.::':•r: • ';.: ? J:\?. - .{. f^ • ? t} rr'4.. ?? ? ? B.•OYww«I •V: t :A C t. •M• ':Jfr ??S. S tL... Q' w. -^ 1•f'f ^••l :+ w ` t 7? irrlo•.,. :, h_rr.• 5 •'.1?~ 1 I ,a ,aa :x \ rrt`f?i;::` 11. U?' -? v ?.?.sa.:. ..,:. ? •? t ? 580 rT..r:..• :mot; ?r:? '#.. ?:..?.-•?•"•Y',`. •.'s .?' .? Mw: .• '"1 1- t" r:?'li I'•• ?. 71 p. -ti "o 'a 'ir:'P' I?q:?','• at?t ua ?:::°.. •v' t S •_ l? t' ,4. •;L' :t: .•? •??' 'ZyJ{•..s•.i.: •j?:. f,F ! ,. I 1, _ w:.lrw Ix' ,'i •`?:i +'?':: j'. /./k1: Is i N' •,9•;' :'is"•? t tl{661Y .s??-, i7. ?i,? ? / ?%• ?3 1 CA•ar ranlno. .•?_ ?' :?: ..VZ• .1•µ: ,- eva ::v.. is-. '`:.:•• _ .. •; i:? }. Jiuwti.+ri. ,mss:: ;1'• - - - -. ^ ?:. M.:. •r -• _ ,y ..,Stawu;rj:'•t•'+i•2:: ...li•?:ii: .•:P.•._. 1..•,,?;.•?. :1: ?... ^trT,,;• -:?.si I ra };.i:t./I ?''••?I:i:. :.','^t;• :Y: S RI 'Al :%z' FT`Y:":? t. `d Ir?'a. as !'586 a? •a iI 565 SAFETY .•a?„?r?.?` .?i•o:::.....^M.•.r.Er• •i..;??+. iw?ll n •4•?.w ilas4.•::,,; :a .;,;..1f`Ci ••?•• •0.:• ?i yjti - N .; Z ?. l - I ... a'i:}! ?t•,wa :J•::•'.?::••' ?`? :'••- , • i ? '?.Yi' Mr.^iw ??. ?' :r .: r.. ^•590A t 1..:. :'u,awwitei,•ut•i.,wry.^; ?'?.:r?r ?!:•',:`:; r:. : . ''`?` s. PROJECT- SITE -•?ti ri:...!LirA'?'-?"S//iI?••••r /aL>.Tr r.I90a ?!'? ?-A.f/??• --?-.?s Y~ ..• >::i•s.(•.:. 60 ^'n:(4vir ?i ?r %:':. «';•r : .: \' !'.:: .-t . _;:s?$ r«... : 3ry..} ;?' •il '•s.; ,.':: ? r.P _ ;... ;. .t•r:l;?:t';!::•:. ::: :, ..?.'•:?•t•;•: ail.t':•`•;:•? 3 CLEARVVATER „ •:' ,+r?:a'''•/' 'ii:i• ?`<.VK 1? _ G ? r 6..t {,_. ?, •:s: :i3 .ri`?':i•. :!.'• :.i.i?t:•??: •''. ??. :? ? 5958: ,. ,x i sr :i;.j;:?,•:+i:::!?i;i•• ::.:..:::.:.: ? _«:r: .r,•:;:::• iii 's 4%i:• :?:z" l •'? _ r. ^?•?:l: i?•• :•rt.. '• .`ts':.r•:: ?•,t:: Vii) :',.:. .c:: .•i ''% ,i:. ` "• ;y:: ^ .t a. lira ••.'.• 1 ?:.?;:..: :i,?'; .; t• :;.•.`.•,•••., ?,r !? ?r .;:.3 :•r::?47:rn^i4'.?!1,. •..rw ?t :7 I:a :St: ?::;.'. t; ?:';ti:..': ?Q ??'•J?•. ':'; 0?'' ••i"?•' ?. t -•.« a. aw ?•Y•:i :?w :?T.tl!Iti?\;, :Yt?v :'r• •s tit: ::..::t:: :;:: :j : - j? ;i .: ;}.„ ?:. :::j(BELLEAIR 59 A 1 .?' *.ti .:i. _ Si:.•.:,1:•? ;"'• r EACH: a. , 'y I • .r: - ..a? ?M:;::4.: a,' - ?:>?.' •::;::? a': GENERAL LOCATION MAP MAP A MAP B r s i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 TOPOGRAPHY PuTh lph@@ Metro Development Corporation. e ?m goo Post,Buckley, Schuh 3 Jernigan, inc. 12 imy m2 As • we-tee." MAP C 1 1 1 1 r r LEGEND 411 - PRE FLAiwooo8 421 - xeilc OAK 422 - oT ER MARDwooD 641 - FFEamwATER mARSM 741 - SCRAPED AREAS I 1 ---Drew Street ? i •--f4 ^ ,f , - - p ----. / AMY /' '- - ----- - - ---- 741 % PRE'FLATWOOD ?URINE?D - OAK SCRUB s 411 i 421 r 1 .LY ALTERED 741 -- ---------- i P OW to B1 Wvd. . SA BO I / / ? ?Fild?yrumwsrr `r "ICYLTt4LY ALiWv Elb I 11 II 7K1 ---------- r / AVY" --- / _- I ARrA IIAAWi / /' `` r o r / 44 1/ ?\- X / 741/ 111/1/1// /: I , I r l r r i I i i I r i i r r 1 1 1 ? ' I l i l Ii i? 1 ? I It I I I EXISTING LAND USE VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS PETh lphb??& Metro Development Corporation r I I I r I r / / i / I i 1 A 1 ' 1 ? . I I n? ?-' I I i 1 ? -- I I I I- ?? 1 yy 1 l j f 1` r I 1 ` I i i I \ ? Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jemiganjnc. 12 AX.Y 1"2 ,w . ow-naoo MAPD&F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ml ?I d Ad ADAMSVLLE FNE SAND AS ASTATULA FMC SAND. MOD. DEEP WATER TABLE Fh FELLOWSHIP LOAMY FMC SAW IM IMMOKALEE ME SAW My MYAKKA FME SAW Or omAWo FNE SAW. WET VARIANT Pn PLACD FNE SAW Wt WAUCHULA FME SAW SOIL ASSOCIATIONS PE[F[k ph@@ Metro Development Corporation. Post. Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 12 JULY 1"2 in . 990-2w" MAP E V I 1 LEGEND as DRY DETEWnDN AREA 00 WET DETENTION AREA It. ? PROPOSED SWALE 3---K PROPOSED PIPE %*./ DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY 4 ? EXISTING OUTFALL CD MARSH SAWGRASS I I I ? d ? I ? I oTeW EIa3n/o ewrFAu treat . " •' •` • ` r ' VERTICAL STORAGE 1A (.70 AC/Ft) 0000 / / ACRE - '•? '.5 'VERTICAL STORAGE 11 ACIFO / A )ES / 1s CJ 1 •„ 0A'VERTIC/(L STORAGE '"? ,1s2A?/si?~ .2 ACRES 1' VERTICAL 9TORAGE '*4 Am - / / , / f ,.•'fA AgE6 W-OCENT4N STORAGE- A W _l E"C L 1.6 ,ra- AMFH----- --- A ACRES 1.6' Al TICAL STORAGE r .25 ACRES \ / 2' VERTCAL STORAGE //? AC C1 'VER9 ' CAL STORAGE ( .S AC/Ftr _ / p gy \ i ' t f j II / '/ #•41 +€8'--- / ' / i Y VERTICAL ,stORAG6' , j (Ld Aelft) / '' I I ,' , I F 19 ? , / i l ?S/ aC/ / l i ACREV i o t / 2' VERTICAL STORItGE j I I I l / / , t d ACRES ? / i r i i• (,'S AC/FO % l l i ' 1 ' / I . / 2' V1?RJRICAL S'ORjGE i i I (F9 AoU li / - ! / / / ' I! i , i r 4 I I A ACRES ? / / + I j;6• VEITIO1 4'8/fGRAOEi I(.>`3 ACG?'U? r I I 1 9TORA0E ``[ III- V IbL b-j W. ?/ R'/ 1 \ fLTMT10R a 9WA I I 1 I II j j ; ` COLLECTION 1 I 1 I I 1 I I E7II6T01S -ALL r I i ? `\l 11I, it i t0 BOY Dw. S60 i MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN PETh IPOC4?5j)@@ Metro Development Corporation Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jemigen, Inc. 12 JULY 1092 ift • goo-ML" MAP G ..• .r:t.•:5..•..? Sri ?: _ _ • ;:•t. : io?tu.Tlbi.i:R +ttaln ir1?aE:Y ''': _ D'?k -- = "• nGbn grrl.d .1?:;fir::. ..: y - - ... :??,??? ??y,: ??;;E,?;.:..,.,.: ;?'.'T;T a+?r •, >. s ? s LJ st - - ?'-- ?° - tt/°al? „ s - s< _ •'ir - - - _ s -_- ••ttlxottRn irwrlrwt{IEa;'??:;a' •eirn ' _ _ Pik •Z t'iw-=?•i:\liii`:iE++iouyC•1'??'.. -M'i1wtC.L aR - I SVO - - _ - ?_•. •: •~i arm a?T•fat. r ? . fates aitWMWWMO? fib ow ?_ •i•Ort •NCLOTE •Er:;;v ::i Su °' rN .I V»n J -? Pr _ - __ .•1 •S. ST•tE P•O%:•. •?j!>:: i;••'•, •: _tltl', , " .: PIN L-L'AS C A 7: tNLIOTE i1•TIOM•l i.: :::.`'•i (3 o '? f? •y ?CV, { t - - :y41LOR1lE RiiUGE {:• Li ?::'`;:i ...jt^. ; •i?l e, l,= ;F +- LIA, .. iii !: :i:• :7r. -,•`rf.?:a'::-•?.,w b...• !•b•a0 - SU•O•RO COW - /resin i?: SY•. D'.aas...yy??? ??? a t•W( 0M30 PAI ,•`,:': :.;,°; j-'•i'i?'•••s•?•.:;•".::y.`a TARPON -SPRINGS ??` .. ' 3" I? I 3. t t1 `. B r tJ 17 ul ?•?::• ••• •• ••l iaPO%SPNN45 r Y , N•••'~ DttiW Tlo UM•N(orP?(T •Rf? r I _ FIRE DEPT./ EMERGENCY 9I ' MEDICAL SERVICE P? n I ?/ n ?ra_ .? .6 POLICE DEPT. „ 1Q ?$.r:•}+?:R::; r?'L'1...,y :rri?9E•Cj=; r'r _, " ? 1 - _ %• :;: 19 Irv rr !!?, P•l ! N•Reoa 4; :, {±` ?{S:1•1i.' •.t :.?+?:: •:'•'.,3•`R r `O:Jr f•a v .?.•Ih, . l'..: ?> rist.- s.Lls?_:L 564A :: I C:ea• r,r•r? •!?':•i.^.atJ•'•tA?ulA 6n 1:• a t l 3 ?a.{••?:1 y t :• .-Fi' !:3^,' r"?S O''''':^y iMr. Y,1/Rrnw I i ' ~?'•`-?, ::?ir* 3? +?t•1'?.;?,: a:-•3rpli7p? /b C...irw I .I t ; _ ?" °- ',.::: : i• ?Ll::s;:C•' ,,•II'ry:?yla.•`::?r'^`: "' i I _iz .i'r' :+?Q, :rs:. .. iY:6:.• • ?%"' _ _ -- o " L.rA.' u, 1 n i t: ?:. 'ti tt r QQa' t«tr "YmJ':It:....:? St v..,.V. I 1 __ . ' • :•:allnrnarw••yl4.:t:}::;r• u / 1! 1 1tl IatS 11) AM l: .r: r.. s• .: •V••.. - O' , ! I u 1.1 Flow In' 'co ...........: ,,?,<. ri t•».If:::•? f DUNE DIN 584 , - ?a •..:.?:a:, f r:'••+^ . s:t7j?1 r•R::as•?i ?. - I. t J. •S: ?1F,': i•'??• ij3? J• tY u I ly ., h 10 .'t trr•-1 ,~ s t..i. .•.t r.s OLDSMA ?'••:+•M'a ?r -'+`•lki::•. x•595 = I a' "??;;;3:::r:iL:' \ . • :? .: 1. f '1•i :: •L't:f`?y'4, ?. ? 9,.GY.n•»I •?+: .=•I,, ?•jI :4{, ,,, rlf.. _ Q _« .LT1J :,.i'r• tj. •'"+ ?r 7? _ r N l :r+,':,:YlS:r'?'ii A. ,. 6:.:_ 1f. N• T" • , }r/e:R•y.••'K ?r.?y::?E9 % .??" 11;11.aL_ ,y 1!a J.,:n ?: •??ari'r?jyJ? IRIrlwr E 1 t 2y. :'r,:. t. ?:.:;? i• tV.•. ? t ,', ?', ? Sep ..? ` w??. ,s^Y'ri?o.a?i i•?.: ;r, ? .. - t:%.••:". t•?:?,?31„?' JE •'1:; »?41 IP.Y,.:. ??:-?ulN ?,'.,f???:• ? ? ? I 593?: - ?.:. a?l"r.•;?:?:? w':G ?r•'••'• ? •.t Yr -•?r ..1+ 1. .. 'i7: ? ' t.''t' '•• ,?' I Lrrkt•' v ? .: Pr.....'tt ? ?' ;,:Iobb/Yi. ii00r1•"Ir ?:: ^r: - ,f:...•:"?? •?`. 4' ..•:•••' ;L .wilt., i I; .'•.{:{ ?f •"q;:•, r•t.•' Sl I Ch.ui •imina . e r.?:.',^•,? ?+. Yy: t. i•rd" fit a:.:•ilti::i`•.t.. +,Ct,' r /? - - t e: ?!.?1..... ?..•,\ t:. ' t,t4U `?f-?.. .:SR•, f I i..i•Ir!•'•''i''''•''!•. ? S ?:i•?? w S •}^sY {F .`?s _ ?1 1lf• tt:i?.i :: - .t•i7 •t i:;: C::v ::;,• '•r..?W,,:...?;: ,."r't t t}588 .. a II 588 ,SAfETY•M,4RBOR::?:"?tr(+g'•••?' ?':?'?•'r`? •:e •',i:».• • r•'J• iwi.7:.t:::.:,:7' R•••7 nI " ID.11 ,o : b! '• ?i•t? : t,:. .r •: t.:• ':r, .::)`rC::r••e.?,•?r•+wu.•?LYSr.?N- ? III ,•, 4 ? G?.•:•.i: :••i..•: t.?:' 4: 'Mairiw v:- 'ia: . -•I' i.- 590 I::+u•rF... ,?. .•..t?L.. .. .o: •.:' ?•?•• `!? A n {'?s y?,•.y . ?-j}a+ t...! \?II Sgp I t..,t. :•Rt1 •ow•ie??\n.'uwrs:•.; ?*',; Cr ;t•:,•,; •.;::j?}?? 1 PROJECT SITE ?'' ,. rSy?, r! 590 t Jv J+?.r ;t.•w,•.?•t. ? s0 Y? ti,i ;nc •?k;:, '' i,::::;t LEARWATER :dr,. ? =:r : ;'.•;^:' ?r? 1 ^ :i ?,i•: /a.'• G. r •.. y.+ ?:ii.: 3:. t.i+?:: ':r:•?• •:':r{'?. /? ES958: - eS'• ''i is ?•i'?°'? :i: iii ..`J :;•: •??.:.•Y:a. ::j /1 ` '13 ...: '. :i?'• 'r'%:• 't1?:::.:;r,;. ELLEAIR 595A W 4L ?3` = ` ? ?' • • • ' C •: '• ? \? EACM' y ?i ,I ?irt? .1?..:r•_... : itL:: t ' .: a »?::: PUBLIC FACILITIES & SERVICES MAP t ..• .r:t.•:5..•..? Sri ?: _ _ • ;:•t. : io?tu.Tlbi.i:R +ttaln ir1?aE:Y ''': _ D'?k -- = "• nGbn grrl.d .1?:;fir::. ..: y - - ... :??,??? ??y,: ??;;E,?;.:..,.,.: ;?'.'T;T a+?r •, >. s ? s LJ st - - ?'-- ?° - tt/°al? „ s - s< _ •'ir - - - _ s -_- ••ttlxottRn irwrlrwt{IEa;'??:;a' •eirn ' _ _ Pik •Z t'iw-=?•i:\liii`:iE++iouyC•1'??'.. -M'i1wtC.L aR - I SVO - - _ - ?_•. •: •~i arm a?T•fat. r ? . fates aitWMWWMO? fib ow ?_ •i•Ort •NCLOTE •Er:;;v ::i Su °' rN .I V»n J -? Pr _ - __ .•1 •S. ST•tE P•O%:•. •?j!>:: i;••'•, •: _tltl', , " .: PIN L-L'AS C A 7: tNLIOTE i1•TIOM•l i.: :::.`'•i (3 o '? f? •y ?CV, { t - - :y41LOR1lE RiiUGE {:• Li ?::'`;:i ...jt^. ; •i?l e, l,= ;F +- LIA, .. iii !: :i:• :7r. -,•`rf.?:a'::-•?.,w b...• !•b•a0 - SU•O•RO COW - /resin i?: SY•. D'.aas...yy??? ??? a t•W( 0M30 PAI ,•`,:': :.;,°; j-'•i'i?'•••s•?•.:;•".::y.`a TARPON -SPRINGS ??` .. ' 3" I? I 3. t t1 `. B r tJ 17 ul ?•?::• ••• •• ••l iaPO%SPNN45 r Y , N•••'~ DttiW Tlo UM•N(orP?(T •Rf? r I _ FIRE DEPT./ EMERGENCY 9I ' MEDICAL SERVICE P? n I ?/ n ?ra_ .? .6 POLICE DEPT. „ 1Q ?$.r:•}+?:R::; r?'L'1...,y :rri?9E•Cj=; r'r _, " ? 1 - _ %• :;: 19 Irv rr !!?, P•l ! N•Reoa 4; :, {±` ?{S:1•1i.' •.t :.?+?:: •:'•'.,3•`R r `O:Jr f•a v .?.•Ih, . l'..: ?> rist.- s.Lls?_:L 564A :: I C:ea• r,r•r? •!?':•i.^.atJ•'•tA?ulA 6n 1:• a t l 3 ?a.{••?:1 y t :• .-Fi' !:3^,' r"?S O''''':^y iMr. Y,1/Rrnw I i ' ~?'•`-?, ::?ir* 3? +?t•1'?.;?,: a:-•3rpli7p? /b C...irw I .I t ; _ ?" °- ',.::: : i• ?Ll::s;:C•' ,,•II'ry:?yla.•`::?r'^`: "' i I _iz .i'r' :+?Q, :rs:. .. iY:6:.• • ?%"' _ _ -- o " L.rA.' u, 1 n i t: ?:. 'ti tt r QQa' t«tr "YmJ':It:....:? St v..,.V. I 1 __ . ' • :•:allnrnarw••yl4.:t:}::;r• u / 1! 1 1tl IatS 11) AM l: .r: r.. s• .: •V••.. - O' , ! I u 1.1 Flow In' 'co ...........: ,,?,<. ri t•».If:::•? f DUNE DIN 584 , - ?a •..:.?:a:, f r:'••+^ . s:t7j?1 r•R::as•?i ?. - I. t J. •S: ?1F,': i•'??• ij3? J• tY u I ly ., h 10 .'t trr•-1 ,~ s t..i. .•.t r.s OLDSMA ?'••:+•M'a ?r -'+`•lki::•. x•595 = I a' "??;;;3:::r:iL:' \ . • :? .: 1. f '1•i :: •L't:f`?y'4, ?. ? 9,.GY.n•»I •?+: .=•I,, ?•jI :4{, ,,, rlf.. _ Q _« .LT1J :,.i'r• tj. •'"+ ?r 7? _ r N l :r+,':,:YlS:r'?'ii A. ,. 6:.:_ 1f. N• T" • , }r/e:R•y.••'K ?r.?y::?E9 % .??" 11;11.aL_ ,y 1!a J.,:n ?: •??ari'r?jyJ? IRIrlwr E 1 t 2y. :'r,:. t. ?:.:;? i• tV.•. ? t ,', ?', ? Sep ..? ` w??. ,s^Y'ri?o.a?i i•?.: ;r, ? .. - t:%.••:". t•?:?,?31„?' JE •'1:; »?41 IP.Y,.:. ??:-?ulN ?,'.,f???:• ? ? ? I 593?: - ?.:. a?l"r.•;?:?:? w':G ?r•'••'• ? •.t Yr -•?r ..1+ 1. .. 'i7: ? ' t.''t' '•• ,?' I Lrrkt•' v ? .: Pr.....'tt ? ?' ;,:Iobb/Yi. ii00r1•"Ir ?:: ^r: - ,f:...•:"?? •?`. 4' ..•:•••' ;L .wilt., i I; .'•.{:{ ?f •"q;:•, r•t.•' Sl I Ch.ui •imina . e r.?:.',^•,? ?+. Yy: t. i•rd" fit a:.:•ilti::i`•.t.. +,Ct,' r /? - - t e: ?!.?1..... ?..•,\ t:. ' t,t4U `?f-?.. .:SR•, f I i..i•Ir!•'•''i''''•''!•. ? S ?:i•?? w S •}^sY {F .`?s _ ?1 1lf• tt:i?.i :: - .t•i7 •t i:;: C::v ::;,• '•r..?W,,:...?;: ,."r't t t}588 .. a II 588 ,SAfETY•M,4RBOR::?:"?tr(+g'•••?' ?':?'?•'r`? •:e •',i:».• • r•'J• iwi.7:.t:::.:,:7' R•••7 nI " ID.11 ,o : b! '• ?i•t? : t,:. .r •: t.:• ':r, .::)`rC::r••e.?,•?r•+wu.•?LYSr.?N- ? III ,•, 4 ? G?.•:•.i: :••i..•: t.?:' 4: 'Mairiw v:- 'ia: . -•I' i.- 590 I::+u•rF... ,?. .•..t?L.. .. .o: •.:' ?•?•• `!? A n {'?s y?,•.y . ?-j}a+ t...! \?II Sgp I t..,t. :•Rt1 •ow•ie??\n.'uwrs:•.; ?*',; Cr ;t•:,•,; •.;::j?}?? 1 PROJECT SITE ?'' ,. rSy?, r! 590 t Jv J+?.r ;t.•w,•.?•t. ? s0 Y? ti,i ;nc •?k;:, '' i,::::;t LEARWATER :dr,. ? =:r : ;'.•;^:' ?r? 1 ^ :i ?,i•: /a.'• G. r •.. y.+ ?:ii.: 3:. t.i+?:: ':r:•?• •:':r{'?. /? ES958: - eS'• ''i is ?•i'?°'? :i: iii ..`J :;•: •??.:.•Y:a. ::j /1 ` '13 ...: '. :i?'• 'r'%:• 't1?:::.:;r,;. ELLEAIR 595A W 4L ?3` = ` ? ?' • • • ' C •: '• ? \? EACM' y ?i ,I ?irt? .1?..:r•_... : itL:: t ' .: a »?::: PUBLIC FACILITIES & SERVICES MAP t 1 12. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. REFERRING TO MAP H, DESCRIBE AND DISCUSS IN GENERAL TERMS ALL MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN ITS COMPLETED FORM. INCLUDE IN THIS DISCUSSION THE PROPOSED PHASES (OR STAGES) OF DEVELOPMENT, MAGNITUDE IN THE APPROPRIATE UNITS FROM CHAPTER 22F-2, F.A.C., AND EXPECTED BEGINNING AND COMPLETION DATES FOR CONSTRUCTION. FOR NON- RESIDENTIAL DRI'S ALSO INCLUDE TARGET DATES FOR FACILITY OPERATION OR UTILIZATION. IF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE A PROPOSED BUILDOUT OF 10 YEARS OR LESS, PHASING SHOULD BE SHOWN ON AN ANNUAL OR BIANNUAL BASIS. IF THE PROPOSED BUILDOUT IS GREATER THAN 10 YEARS, PHASING SHOULD BE SHOWN AS APPROPRIATE. Park Place is a planned retail and office complex. Under the defini- tions provided in Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 22F-2, the project is a shopping center/office park DRI. The Master Concept Plan (Map H) indicates a maximum of 1,960,000 square feet of retail and office space within a 99 acre site. The Master Concept Plan provides for development to begin in the south central tracts, and progress outward during the buildout period. A variety of building types will be constructed, ranging from two story office park type structures to ten story mid-rise. The overall planning concept emphasizes extensively landscaped open areas with an attractive pedestrian focus provided by urban plazas and internal pathway systems. Retail Development Retail space will be located along side office space within tracts in the southern half of the project site. In some cases, retail space may be included within office buildings. The total square footage of retail space within Park Place is 460,000 square feet. Retail space will generally be designed to meet the objectives of maximizing on-site sales opportunities and providing an attractive 12-1 METROI:V 590-298.06 I retail atmosphere. Specialty retail tenants will be emphasized, as opposed to major retail anchors and large chain stores. Further description of the retail portion of the project can be found under Section 20; Economics. Office Development There are two types of office space proposed for the project. In the northern half of the project site, the planning concept is to construct two and three story office park-type buildings. In the central portion of the site, mid-rise office buildings are proposed ranging from six to ten stories in height. Along the southern portion of the project site, the mid-rise office and/or retail buildings are again proposed, in transition from existing development along Route 60. A total of 1,500,000 square feet of office space is proposed. Phasing Plan The proposed phasing of Park Place is shown in Table 12-1. Develop- ment is scheduled to begin in 1983 and to be completed in 1991. B. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES ON THE SITE FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PRO- JECT. USE LEVEL II OF THE FLORIDA LAND USE AND COVER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM: A TECHNICAL REPORT, AVAILABLE FROM EACH REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. REFER TO MAPS D (EXISTING LAND USE) AND H (MASTER PLAN). USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND TREAT EACH LAND USE CATEGORY AS MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. (1) THIS QUESTION SHOULD BE ANSWERED FOR EACH LAND USE/COVER CATE- GORY, LEVEL III, AS INDICATED ON MAPS D, F, & H. A breakdown of existing and future land uses is provided in Table 12-2. Al so see Maps D and F, and Map H; which show existing land uses and the Master Development Plan, respectively. 12-2 METROI:V 590-298.06 ?f TABLE 12-1 DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN ' PHASE RETAIL OFFICE TOTAL COMPLETION j Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Ac. Year I 100,000 435,000 535,000 23.8 1985 II 160,000 545,000 705,000 30.1 1988 III 200,000 520,000 720,000 30.3 1991 TOTAL 460,000 1,500,000 1,960,000 84.2* * does not include 5.0 acre park and 9.9 acres road right-of-way 12-3 METROI:AA 590-298.06 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE 12-2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES LAND USES CLASS EXISTING PROPOSED Acres Percent Acres Percent 100-URBAN OR BUILT UP 121-Retail Sales & Service 0.0 0.0 13.7 14 124-Offices & Professional Services 0.0 0.0 65.1 66 144-Major Roads & Highways 0.0 0.0 9.9 10 173-Parks 0.0 0.0 5.0 5 400-FORESTED UPLANDS 411-Pine Flatwoods 52.5 52.9 421-Xeric Oak 6.3 6.4 422-Other Hardwood 35.5 35.8 500-WATER 561-Ponds 0.0 0.0 4.2 4 600-WETLANDS 641-Freshwater Marsh 2.6 2.7 1.2 1 700-BARREN LANDS 741-Scraped Areas 2.2 2.2 TOTAL 99.1 100.0 99.1 100 12-4 METROI:BB 590-298.06 C. PROVIDE A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF THE SITE PLANNING APPROACH TO BE UTILIZED FOR THIS PROJECT. INCLUDE AS PART OF THE DISCUSSION CONSI- DERATIONS OF UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER FEATURES INVOLVED IN THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS. Through its variety of vegetation and rolling topography, the Park Place site offers numerous opportunities to develop a unique and pleasing project. The major vegetation systems on site include large areas of pine flatwoods, oak hammock and a small freshwater marsh. To incorporate the type of intense urban development proposed for Park Place into the existing site character, a number of objec- tives will be considered. Wherever possible, areas of distinct topography and desirable native vegetation will be preserved. The basic character of the development will be accentuated through the use of landscaped buffer areas which will soften the intensity of the land use while providing a comprehensive open space system. A principal internal roadway system will be designed as a parkway, with landscaped medians where acceptable to the City, and a buffer along each side to accommodate landscaped berms with varying topogra- phy. The roadway system for the project will be designed to empha- size internal access to the various tracts in the project. In addi- tion, the provision of efficient and easily accessible pedestrian and bicycle pathways will encourage these uses as opposed to internal automobile traffic. A six foot wide pathway will wind through the buffer area, shaded by trees to encourage pedestrian use. For further discussion of the open space concepts planned for the project site see Question 27: Recreation. 12-5 METROI:V 590-298.06 i The stormwater management system proposed for the project will emphasize cascaded water quality and quantity management techniques. These will include collection from the impervious surfaces, routing through swales and open spaces to dry detention areas, with over- flow to wet detention areas also located within open space and greenbelts. Further description of the stormwater management system proposed for the site can be found under Question 22: Drainage. The project location, being central to retail and office markets in Pinellas County and in Western Hillsborough County, is complemented by present urban development surrounding the project site. The ultimate expression of the planning concept described herein will ' establish a homogeneous image for the entire park in order that Park Place express a distinct identity of the highest quality and stand- ards, second to none in the Greater Tampa Bay area. I 12-6 METR01:V 590-298.06 1 13. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: AIR A. ESTIMATE AVERAGE DAILY EMISSIONS IN POUNDS PER DAY BY TYPE AND SOURCE. ' The only major source of air pollutants associated with the project will be from vehicular traffic. Estimated vehicular emissions are shown by phase in Table 13-1. B. WILL A COMPLEX SOURCE PERMIT BE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 17-2.04, RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION? IF AN APPLICA- TION FOR THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN PREPARED, IT MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE APPROPRIATE PORTIONS OF THIS SECTION. A complex source permit will not be required for the project. IC. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO REDUCE EMISSIONS AND TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE EFFECTS? On-site emissions can be reduced by providing an efficient site ac- cess and parking design. Pollutants per vehicle will continue to decline as older vehicles are retired and newer vehicles meet more I stringent standards under the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program. The overall concentration of air pollutants can be further reduced by staggered work hours and by transit alternatives such as car pool- ing and bus service to the project. The provision of pedestrian and bicycle pathways will also assist in reducing internal automobile use. Fi nally, the computer controlled signalization of key inter- sections will promote efficient traffic flow and further assist in reducing overall concentrations of air pollutants in t he project area. 13-1 METROI:W 590-298.06 TABLE 13-1 CUMULATIVE DAILY EMISSIONS (lbs/day) PHASE HYDROCARBONS NOX CO I. Retail 96.2 170.1 1006.0 Office 239.0 422.9 2500.6 Total 335.2 593.0 3506.6 II. Retail 168.0 379.5 2064.2 Office 361.8 817.4 4446.0 Total 529.8 1196.9 6510.2 III. Retail 226.8 490.0 2926.2 Office 422.7 913.0 5452.4 Total 649.5 1403.0 8378.6 SOURCE: Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Emissions Factors are from Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors: Highway Mobile Sources EPA 460/3-81-005, March 1981. Average trip length is 5.8 miles for retail and 10.4 miles for office trips. Average network speed is 35 mph. Operating mode combinations are: 20.6% cold start, non-catalyst; 27.3% hot start, catalyst; 20.6% cold start, catalyst. 13-2 METROI:CC 590-298.03 ' QUESTION 14. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: LAND A. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF EACH OF THE SOILS INDICATED ON MAP E UTILI- ZING THE FOLLOWING FORMAT: TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A(1) EXPAND THE SOIL DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION TABLE TO INCLUDE THE DEGREE AND KIND OF SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED USES. REFER TO THE FLORIDA GENERAL SOILS ATLAS FOR REGIONAL PLANNING DESTRICTS VII AND VIII. The two major shallow sub-surface geologic formations in Pinellas County are the Hawthorne Formation and the Caloosahatchee Marl Form- ation. The project site is in that portion of the County underlain by the Caloosahatchee Marl, consisting of sand, clay, and marl of marine origin. During the Pleistocene, both Hawthorne and Caloosahatchee formations were covered by additional marine deposits forming four terraces. The project site is located in an area of transition between the Talbot and Penholoway Terraces. Both terraces tend to exhibit Astatula and Myakka soil associations, which are the predominant soils on the project site. Exhibit 14-1 (Map E) shows the soil types found on the project site as identified in the Soil Survey Report for Pinellas County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1982). ' Two major soil associations are found on the project site. The 1 Astatula-Adamsville association is comprised of nearly level and gen- tly sloping deep sandy soils on broad low ridges. This association is found in the southwestern portion of the site. The Myakka- Immokalee-Pomello association. is found on the eastern part of the ' project site, and is comprised of nearly level and gently sloping, 14-1 METROI:C 590-298.06 I I poorly drained and moderately well drained sandy soils that have layers of weakly cemented organic matter at depths of 40" or less. Descriptions of the individual soil types as determined by the Pinellas County Soil Conservation Service are provided in Table 14-1. W B. WHERE THE DEGREE OF LIMITATIONS IS VERY SEVERE, SEVERE, OR MODERATE FOR A PARTICULAR SOIL, DISCUSS HOW EACH OF THESE LIMITATIONS WILL BE OVERCOME AND WHAT SITE ALTERATIONS WILL BE NECESSARY BOTH FOR THE PRESENT DEVELOPER AND ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPERS OR OWNERS. ' The primary limitations for building construction are related to wetness and high water tables. The limitations for pond embankments, reservoirs, and roads and paved areas are also related primarily to wetness and high water tables. A secondary limitation involves the clay content of certain soils on the site which may result in local- iced shrink/swell potentials which are excessive for building foun- dations or pond embankments. Additional soils tests were performed on-site by Williams and Associates, Inc. in November and December of 1981. During these ' investigations 23 soil borings were made in a grid pattern and 7 penetration tests were conducted for assessing building foundation ' support. The results of these tests indicate that the water table on site in November of 1981 ranged from 9 feet below the surface on the ridge within the Astatula and Myakka soils types, to 3.4 feet 14-2 ' METROI:C 590-298.06 r? rr r r r r rr rr rr rr r? rr ?r ? r r r r r?TABLE 14-1 SOIL DESCRIPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS DEGREE AND KIND DEGREE AND KIND DEGREE AND KIND DEGREE AND KIND SEASONAL HIGH PERMEABILITY OF LIMITATION OF LIMITATION OF LIMITATION OF LIMITATION WATER TABLE RATE FOR LOW FOR POND FOR ROADS AND FOR POND SOIL NAME SOIL DESCRIPTION DEPTH - DURATION (Inches/Hour) BUILDINGS EMBANKMENTS PAVED AREAS RESERVOIRS Adamsville Nearly level; somewhat poorly 24-42- 6 mos 6.0-20 Moderate; Severe; cutbanks Moderate; Severe; fine sand drained; on broad, low flats inches wetness cave; wetness wetness seepage less than 2 feet higher than adjacent sloughs Astatula Excessively drained, nearly 72- continuous 20 Slight Severe; cutbanks Slight Severe; fine sand level to steep soils; 0 to 30 inches cave seepage percent slope Immokalee Nearly level, poorly drained 10- less than 6.3-20 (0-36") Severe; high Severe; unstable Moderate; high Severe; fine sand soil on broad flats between inches 2 mos 0.63-6.3(36-5011) water table side slopes water table seepage; high sloughs; occurs in small 6.3-20 (50"+) water table areas at higher elevations in association with better drained soils Myakka fine Poorly drained; weekly cemented 0-12- 9 mos 6.0-20.0 Severe; wetness Severe; seepage; Severe; wetness Severe; sand BH horizon within 30 inches of inches erodes easily seepage surface; 0 to 2 percent slope. Fellowship Undulating, poorly drained 10- 6 mos 0.63-2.0(0-11") Severe; high Severe; high Severe; high Severe; low Loamy Fine uplands Soil; slopes range inches 0.06-0.20(11-2311) water table; water table; water table; bearing capacity Sand from 5 to 8 percent 0.06 or less high shrink high shrink high shrink and high shrink (23-70") /swell potential /swell potential /swell potential /swell potential Orlando Nearly level, somewhat poorly Less 2 mos greater than 20 Severe; high Severe; high Severe; high Severe; seep- Fine Sand drained soil near flatwoods than water table water table water table age and un- wet variant and uplands ridges; Slopes 10 inches stable side range from 2 to 5 percent slopes Placid Nearly level, very poorly Less 9 mos 6.3-20 Severe; high Severe; high Severe; high Severe; seep- Fine Sand drained depressional Soil, than water table; water table; water table; age, high Slopes 0 to 2 percent 10 inches flooding flooding flooding water table Wauchula Nearly level, very poorly Less 6 mos 6.3 or more (0-26") Severe; high Severe; high Severe; high Severe; seep- Fine Sand drained pine flatwoods. Soil, than 2.0-6.3 (26-35") water table; water table; water table; age, high Slopes 0 to 2 percent 10 inches 0.63-2.0 (35-80") flooding flooding flooding water table ' below the ground surface in the Myakka soils adjacent to the Placid fine sand (the marsh area). The water table throughout the site averaged 5 feet or more below the ground surface. These results indicate that high water table conditions on the site have been affected by surrounding drainage improvements, to the extent that ' limitations due to high water table are not as severe as the soils types descriptions indicate. According to the Williams report, soils on-site are favorable for shallow foundation supports for ' either light commercial or mid-rise condominium structures. However, clay soils with significant potential for post-construction movement due to shrinkage and swelling were found to be randomly located on the site. At one location clay soils were found at ' depths as shallow as 5 feet, however, most often these clay soils were located at depths of 8 to 15 feet. As the clay layers are reportedly randomly scattered throughout the general area, they can be best dealt with through building-specific removal during foundation excavation, followed by replacement with compacted clean fill. ' Corrective measures for limitations with respect to roads and pave- ment areas may include removal and replacement of clay soil or sub- soil with more suitable material, filling to proper grade, and compaction. Limitations with respect to pond embankments and reservoirs will primarily be overcome through design and construction of shallow side slopes for detention areas in order to help increase stability, and in placement of sod or other stabilizers on the side slopes as soon as possible after construction. 14-4 METR01:C 590-298.06 C. IS THE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN AN AREA OF KNOWN MINERAL DEPOSITS? IF SO, SPECIFY. WILL EXTRACTION OF ANY MINERAL RESOURCES OCCUR ON-SITE ¦ EVEN THOUGH ANCILLARY TO OPERATION OF THE PROJECT? There are no mineral deposits or mineral resources on-site with potential for commercial exploitation. Mineral extraction is not planned in any case. D. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT TO PREVENT OR CONTROL WIND AND WATER SOIL EROSION? INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PLANS FOR CLEARING AND GRADING AS RELATED TO EROSION CONTROL. Wind and water erosion will be controlled by phasing site development so that large areas are not left exposed for a long periods of time, by holding grading to a minimum and retaining existing vegetation to h t e the extent possible, by protecting cleared areas through seeding, mulching and/or installing sod as soon as possible after construc- tion, and by providing for safe disposal of.runoff through the storm water management system. 1 E. DESCRIBE ANY UNIQUE GEOLOGIC FEATURES ON THE SITE, AND DISCUSS WHAT ' ASPECTS OF THE SITE PLAN WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR OR TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM. I The site does not have unique geologic features. 14-5 METROI:C 590-298.06 F I I 1 1 I QUESTION 15. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WATER A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS (GROUND AND SURFACE WATER) ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE, INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION AND DISCUSSION OF ANY POTENTIAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. GROUNDWATER The Caloosahatchee Marl Formation described under Question 14, Land, is underlain by a hard limestone layer known as the Tampa formation. This formation, at one time, provided nearly all of the water used for both irrigation and potable use in Pinellas County, and is the uppermost waterbearing unit of the Floridan Aquifer. The Tampa Formation is approximately 40 to 50 feet below the ground surface in the vicinity of the pro- ject site. According to U.S. Geological Survey information (Report of Investigations No. 12, Groundwater Resources of Pinellas County, Florida, 1954) the surficial aquifer (Shallow water table) in the vicinity of the project site is not a useful source of potable water. This is primarily due to the fre- quency with which clay layers occur in the Caloosahatchee Marl Formation. These clay layers serve as a semicontinuous con- fining layer for the Floridan Aquifer; however, they also serve to limit the water bearing capacity of the shallow sediments which cover the limestone formations. 15-1 METROI:D 590-298.06 ?I The USGS survey study cited above indicates that the area surrounding Coachman was, in the early 1950's, considered to be a point of recharge to the Floridan Aquifer. Coachman is located north and west of the project site, and the site does not appear to be included within the potential recharge area defined by USGS. The site will have limited recharge poten- tial due to intermittent subsurface clay layers; however, recharge can be facilitated by careful location of detention areas within the project. Based on potentiometric surface graphics prepared by USGS, and on topographic maps, the direction of groundwater flow on the project site is from west to east. The potentiometric surface falls rapidly as the western shore of Tampa Bay is approached, due to discharge from the aquifer into the Bay. SURFACE WATER There are no permanent surface water bodies on the site. One intermittent water body, in the form of a shallow freshwater marsh, is located along the eastern border of the property. This shallow wetland is dry during some portions of the year, and is refilled with localized surface water runoff and shallow aquifer groundwater during the wet season. METROI:D 15-2 590-298.06 The project site lies partially within the Alligator Creek drainage basin. Alligator Creek drains a nine square mile basin in a portion of the City and the County to the north of the project site, eventually discharging to Alligator Lake and thence to Tampa Bay. The southern half of the project site drains to the south through the Bayview Area and thence to Tampa Bay. B. DESCRIBE IN TERMS OF APPROPRIATE WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS THE EXISTING GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE WHICH WILL BE INFLUENCED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. GROUNDWATER ¦ The surficial aquifer is in intermittent contact with the Floridan Aquifer in the project vicinity, due to discontinuous clay confining layers. The Floridan Aquifer has undergone gradual degradation in some areas of Pinellas County due to intrusion of saline waters following pumping in excess of recharge over a long period of time. The first reports of salt water intrusion into municipal well fields occurred in St. Petersburg in the 1920's and 30's. In 1950, a well pene- trating the Floridan Aquifer a short distance north of the project site was reported to discharge water containing more than 500 parts per million chloride. Since this time, the quality of waters available from the Floridan Aquifer has remained approximately constant in some areas, and has contin- ued to slowly deteriorate in others. 15-3 590-298.06 METROI:D r w The City of Clearwater has two deep water supply wells tapping the Floridan Aquifer adjacent to the northwest property bound- 11 ary. Both have been in operation for 20 years or more, and both provide good quality water to the 5 million gallon storage tank adjacent to the project site. At present the City obtains approximately 7 million gallons per day from various wells scattered throughout the City, and purchases additional supplies from Pinellas County. It is unlikely that project development will have any effect on wells tapping the Floridan Aquifer, due to the depth of those wells, and the subsurface confining layers. The project does not propose to develop wells in the Floridan Aquifer. 11 In response to the deteriorating potable supply potential of the Floridan Aquifer in central and lower Pinellas County, as well as in other areas of the Tampa Bay region, the West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority was formed. The Authority is developing well fi,eYds employing the latest technology to guard against further salt water intrusion and to assure long-term availability of domestic water supplies. SURFACE WATER 1 J r Alligator Creek is the surface water body nearest the site which would be influenced through site-related drainage. According to the City of Clearwater Environmental Control METROI:D 15-4 590-298.06 Division, the water quality in Alligator Creek and Alligator Lake is fair to good, depending upon sampling location. A major flood and water quality control effort being conducted by the City, the Alligator Creek Water Management Project, is under construction now. This project will attenuate flooding in the basin by providing additional storage during extreme rainfall events, and will improve water quality by providing sediment traps and additional biological control within the floodway. a Alligator Lake is a structure-controlled freshwater body undergoing accelerated eutrophication due to its position as the repository of nutrients draining from the Alligator Creek basin. It is heavily infested with hydrilla and exhibits algae blooms during the summer months, but fish kills have not been reported. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION C. DESCRIBE THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT WILL BE UTILIZED TO MONITOR CHANGES IN THE QUALITY OF GROUND AND SURFACE WATER ANTICIPATED AND BROUGHT ABOUT AS A RESULT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE. A water quality monitoring program is not proposed for the site, as there are no permanent surface water bodies which could be monitored pre- and post-development. The City's present water quality monitoring programs have the ability to identify any detrimental effects on water quality in the 15-5 METROI: D 590-298.06 r r 1 Alligator Creek basin due to stormwater from the project vicinity. If such effects are identified, and are attributable to the project, remedial action will be initiated voluntarily. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION D. DESCRIBE THE MEASURES WHICH WILL BE USED TO MITIGATE (OR AVOID WHERE POSSIBLE) POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY. The drainage and detention system for the project will include both dry detention and wet detention lakes designed to provide treatment of stormwater runoff to mitigate the degradation of water quality in ultimate receiving waters: Alligator Lake and Tampa Bay. The detention areas will be designed to promote mixing and aeration and settlement of particulates. The use f 1 of swales will assist in filtering pollutants prior to storm- water discharge into detention ponds. Wherever possible, dry detention and/or detention with percolation capability will be employed to assist in recharging the shallow aquifer. A combination of the stormwater control measures proposed should result in a positive contribution to present ground water quantity in the project vicinity. Water quality will be improved from raw runoff characteristics prior to discharge from the site via ground and surface waters. t METROI:D 15-6 590-298.06 r ? I QUESTION 16. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WETLANDS A. HOW MANY ACRES OF WETLANDS ARE FOUND ON THE SITE? FOR THESE PURPOSES, ?'. WETLANDS ARE DESCRIBED AS AREAS WHICH ARE SUBJECTED TO PERMANENT OR PROLONGED PERIODS OF INUNDATION OR SATURATION (WATER IS AT THE SOIL SURFACE AT LEAST 2 TO 7 MONTHS, 7 OUT OF 10 YEARS), AND/OR WHICH EXHIBIT VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND/OR SOIL TYPES CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS HYDRO-PERIOD. Wetland classifications were determined using the Division of State Planning's Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System, the U.S. Army Corp Engineers' Preliminary Guide to Wetlands of Penin- sular Florida, and field investigations. Approximately 2.6 acres of wetland are found on the site. The following table provides the acreage for each wetland type. TABLE 16-1 WETLAND ACREAGE PERCENT OF WETLAND VEGETATION EXISTING ACREAGE TOTAL SUBCOMMUNITY ACREAGE PRESERVED WETLAND ACREAGE Sawgrass Marsh 0.50 0.50 19 1 Sagittaria Marsh 0.30 0.30 12 Marsh Scrub 0.90 0.15 6 Marsh Scrub-Hardwood 0.90 0.35 13 2.60 1.20 37 B. WHAT ALTERATION OR DISTURBANCES TO THE WETLAND ARE PROPOSED? A portion of the marsh scrub subcommunity will be removed for a road 3 right-of-way. This area, viewed as transitional relative to the 16-1 ?i METROI:E 590-298.06 f ? 1 1 1 marsh as a whole, is considered less viable than the sawgrass and sagittaria marshes. Removing some of this portion will have little to no impact on the remaining marsh area. Approximately 28 percent of the marsh scrub will be retained, with emphases on preserving the most attractive trees in the northern portion of the scrub-hardwood area. C. WHAT WETLAND AREAS WILL BE PRESERVED IN THEIR NATURAL OR EXISTING STATE? DESCRIBE THE PLANNING APPROACH THAT WILL BE UTILIZED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PRESERVATION? Only one wetland area occurs on the site. This wetland, generally classified as freshwater marsh, is an interrelated system of various vegetation subcommunities. The entire system encompasses approxi- mately 2.6 acres. The subcommunities include,sawgrass marsh, sagit- taria marsh, and marsh scrub of varying composition. These subcom- munities are described in more detail in Quesition 18. The center portion of this wetland area is recognized as being a major aesthetic, as well as ecological, amenity to the site, and it will be utilized as open space. As such, alterations will be restricted to a portion of the marsh scrub and marsh scrub-hardwood leaving the sawgrass and sagittaria marshes intact. Table 16-1 shows the acreage of the wetland subcommunities preserved. 16-2 ,1? METROI:E 590-298.06 R 1 17. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: FLOOD PLAINS A. IS ANY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE AREAS AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION? IF SO, INDICATE WHETHER ALL FLOOR ELEVATIONS WILL BE ABOVE THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LEVEL, AND DISCUSS METHODS WHICH WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE POTENTIAL FLOOD HAZARD. According to Federal Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the project site is entirely within Zone C. Zone C indicates land areas which are above the 500-year flood level. USGS quadrangles and site specific topo- graphic information also confirm the high and well drained nature of the project site. All floor elevations will be above the 100-year flood level. The final master drainage design for the project site will establish on-site water levels under 25-year and 100-year design storm events. These water levels will be maintained in wet detention areas planned for water quantity and quality control on-site. The design storm- water levels established in the master drainage plan will then be used to establish the crown elevations of internal roadways and the finished floor elevations within the project. This information will be available to the City of Clearwater for review during the site plan approval process. B. DOES THE LOCAL JURISDICTION IN WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE? IF SO, ATTACH A LETTER OF VERIFICATION FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. The City of Clearwater is a participant in the Federal Flood Insurance Program (see Exhibit 17-1). 17-1 METR01:1 590-298.06 C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518 CITY MANAGER June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The City of Clearwater has adopted ordinances for the regulation of construction in flood-prone areas and, thereby, meets the requirements of the Federal Flood Insurance Regular Program,. Thus, owners.of buildings within the City qualify for flood insurance under the Federal Program. An administrative policy has-been eptabl:,shed whereby the City.of Clearwater does not interpret. Flood Insurance Rate MM pa ()FIRM). for purpose of determining whether privately-owned property is located in flood hazard zones. The City accepts such determinations as made by a professional engineer, architect, or surveyor licensed to practice.. in the State of Florida. Sincerely, zabeth S. Haeseker Assistant City Manager ?. EXHIBIT 17-1 "Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employe" 11 QUESTION 18. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE A. IDENTIFY THE DOMINANT SPECIES AND OTHER UNUSUAL OR UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS DELINEATED ON MAP F, AND SPECIFY THEIR ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION, HEALTH AND CONDITIONS. The site's vegetation may be classified into the following vegeta- tion communities: ° Pine Flatwoods ° Oak Scrub ° Oak Hammock ° Freshwater Marsh ° Palmetto Prairie The location and areal extent of these communities are shown on Exhibit 18-1. Pine Flatwoods (25.5 acres) The pine flatwoods communities comprise the primary vegetation systems, occupying approximately fifty-three percent of the site area. The overstory is dominated by scattered slash pines Pinus elliottii). The dense understory and groundcover are characterized by saw palmetto Serenoa repens), gallberry Ilex labra), wiregrass Aristida stricta) and various scrub oak and herbaceous species. Species occurring in this community are shown below. METROI: G 18-1 590-298.06 l? COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES ?.. Slash Pine Pinus elliottii Sand Pine Pinus clausa Chapman Oak uercus chapmanii Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera Live Oak (scrub growth) uercus virginiana Gallberry Ilex lg abra Saltbush Baccharis spp. Saw Palmetto Serenoa re ens Pokeweed Rivina humilis Bracken Pteridium aquilinium Pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus Common Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Smutgrass Sporobolus poiretii Cordgrass Spartina bakeri Dogfennel Eupatorium capillifolium Rosemary Cerafiola cricoides Grapevine Vitis spp. Wiregrass Aristida stricta Precatory Bean Abrus precatorius Greenbriar Smilax spp. ' Beauty Bush Callicarpa americana Burnweed Erechtites hieracifolia Hemp Dogbone Apocynum cannabinum Pine Flatwoods - Burned (27.0 acres) A large portion of the pine flatwoods community has been recently burned and is now dominated by secondary growth of woody shrubs. ' Few of the slash pines survived the burning, and they have been replaced by wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), gallberry (Ilex lg abra) and various scrub oak species. Saw palmetto dominates the understory with a dense ground cover of grapevine (Vitis spp.), blackberry (Rhubus spp.) and cordgrass (Spartina bakeri). The dead trunks of slash pines are prominent and no evidence of regenerative growth of this species was found. Other species in this sub-community are provided below. 18-2 METR01:G 590-298.06 COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES . Chapman Oak uercus chapmanii Wax Myrtle Myri'ca cerifera Gallberry Ilex labra Saltbush Baccharis spp. Saw Palmetto Serenoa re ens Pokeweed Rivina humilis Bracken Pteridium aquilinium Pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus Common Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Cordgrass Spartina bakeri Dogfennel Eupatorium capillifolium Rosemary Cerafiola cricoides Grapevine Vitis spp. Wiregrass Aristida stricta Precatory Bean Abrus precatonus Greenbriar Smilax spp. Beauty Bush Callicarpa americana Burnweed Erechtites hieracifolia Hemp Dogbone Apocynum cannabinum Broomsedge Andropogon virginicus Laurel Oak uercus laurifolia Shining Sumac Rhus copallina Oak Scrub (6.3 acres) The oak scrub community (six percent of the site area) is dominated by a variety of scrub oak forms including Chapman oak ( uercus chapmanii), turkey oak ( uercus laevis), laurel oak ( uercus laurifolia) and live oak ( uercus virginiana). The understory is open, containing scattered growth of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex lg abra) and wax myrtle (M rica cerifera), while the ground cover is primarily composed of wiregrass (Aristida stricta), cordgrass (Spartina bakeri), various sedges (Carex spp.), grapevine itis spp.) and occassional herbs. Other species found in this community are provided below. 18-3 METROI:G 590-298.06 rn?Aun?# unur Turkey Oak Live Oak Laurel Oak Myrtle Oak Wax Myrtle Saw Palmetto Cherry Laurel Dogfennel Cordgrass Nightshade Mullein Greenbriar Grapevine Panic Grass Cudweed Lantana Gallberry GENUS SPECIES uercus laevis uercus virginiana uercus laurifolia uercus myrtifolia M rica cerifera Serenoa re ens Prunus caroliniana Eupatorium capillifolium Spartina bakeri Solanum nigrum Verbascum thapsus Smilax spp. Vitis spp. Panicum spp. Graphalium spp. Lantana camara Ilex lg abra Freshwater Marsh (2.6 acres) The freshwater marsh community is a system of sub-communities. As a whole, the freshwater marsh occupies approximately three percent of the site. The sub-communities include sawgrass marsh, sagittaria marsh, marsh scrub and marsh scrub-hardwood dominated. For the most part, these communities form discontinuous rings with the sawgrass marsh occupying the inner portion of the freshwater marsh community. The sagittaria marsh and the marsh scrub occur in peripheral areas around the sawgrass marsh with the marsh scrub occupying slightly higher elevations and the sagittaria marsh on areas having saturated soils year-round. Species found in the freshwater marsh community are shown below. 18-4 METROI:G 590-298.06 I I I COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense Pickerelweed Pontederia lanceolata Soft Rush Juncus effusus, Crinum Lily Crinum americanus Slender Spikerush Eleocharis baldwinii Duck Potato Sagittaria lancifolia Duckweed Lemna minor Marsh Pennywort Hydrocotyle umbellata Water Hyssop Bacopa caroliniana Cordgrass Spartina bakeri Sedge Cyperus spp. Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis Willow Salix caroliniana Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera Saltbush Baccharis spp. Swamp Tupelo Nyssa Sylvatica Redbay Persea borbonia Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana Primrose Willow Ludwigia spp. Smartweed Polygonum hydropiperoides Cutgrass Zizaniopsis miliacea Lizard's Tail Saururus cernuus Oak Hammock (35.5 acres) Two areas on the site contain the oak hammock vegetation community. Although both areas are similar, variations as a resu.lt of elevation and historical land use have given each hammock distinct differences in species composition. The first oak hammock (1.5 acres) occurs in a low area located in the northwest corner of the site and accounts for less than two percent of the site area. This hammock is dominated by live oaks uercus virginiana) and various ground cover species, including grapevine Vitis spp.), greenbriar Smilax auriculata) and native grasses. 18-5 METROI:G 590-298.06 I The second oak hammock (34.0 acres) is located in the southern portion of the site, and contains approximately thirty-four percent of the site area. Within this hammock is an area which previously contained a small farm and residence. As a result, exotic trees are found in this hammock. The overstory is dominated by live oak uercus virginiana). Exotics found in the overstory and midstory include camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) and Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthefolius). Other species in the oak hammock vege- tation community are shown below. COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Live Oak uercus virginiana Myrtle Oak uercus myrtifolia Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora Chapman Oak uercus chapmanii Camphor Tree Cinnamomum camphora Marlberry Ardisia escallonioides Wax Myrtle M rica cerifera Saw Palmetto Serenoa re ens Grapevine Vitis spp. Pokeweed Rivina humilis Cordgrass Spartina bakeri Greenbriar Smilax spp. Bracken Pteridium aquilinium Poison Ivy Rhus radicans Virginia Creeper Patthenocissus quinquefolia B. ARE ANY RARE OR ENDANGERED PLANTS FOUND ON THE SITE. IF SO, WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THESE SPECIES? No rare or endangered plants were observed during the project team site investigations, and none are expected based on habitats exist- ing on-site. 18-6 METROI:G 590-298.06 C. WHAT WILDLIFE (INCLUDING AQUATIC LIFE) NEST, FEED, RESIDE ON OR MIGRATE TO THE SITE? WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THIS WILDLIFE AND THEIR HABITATS? Wildlife that were observed during field investigations or could be expected to occur on the site as a result of compatible range and suitable habitat conditions are identified in Table 18-1. The site is presently surrounded by various urban land uses including a large shopping mall, major transportation routes, restaurants, residential development and various commercial and retail sales uses. Retention of the most viable portions of the marsh, as well as preservation of as much of the oak hammock vegetation as possible will help to provide habitat for a number-of wildlife species that are capable of adaptation to an urbanized or altered landscape. D. ARE ANY OF THE WILDLIFE LISTED UNDER (C) ABOVE CONSIDERED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES? IF SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED STATEMENT ON WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND THEIR BREEDING, NESTING AND FEEDING AREAS. During site investigations, habitat conducive to utilization by the gopher tortoise Go herus polyphemus) and the commensual species Florida mouse (Peromyscus floridanus) and eastern indigo snake (Pry- marchon corgis) was observed. Two osprey nests were also observed on the site. Although these nests showed no signs of habitation during the period that field investigations were conducted, it is assumed that they are active nests during the ospreys' nesting and breeding season (November through April). No other threatened or endangered species were recorded, nor are any expected based on habitat. 18-7 METROI:G 590-298.06 As stated previously, parts of the oak hammock, scrub oak and fresh- water marsh vegetation communities will be preserved in Open Space. It is anticipated. that these areas will provide habitat conditions supporting of a limited number of faunal species, including those discussed above. 18-8 METROI:G 590-298.06 TABLE 18-1 WILDLIFE SPECIES COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Amphibians Southern Toad Bufo terrestris Leopard Frog Rana utricularia Florida Cricket Frog Acris grylus Green Treefrog Hyla cinerea Reptiles Striped Swamp Snake Liodytes alleri Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais Yellow Rat Snake Elaphe obsoleta Corn Snake Elaphe guttata Eastern Garter Snake Thamnophus sirtalis Dusky Pigmy Rattlesnake Sistrurus miliarius barbouri Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake Crotalus adamantus Peninsula Ribbon Snake Thamnophis sauritus sackeri Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Florida Mud Turtle Kinosternon subrubrum Eastern Box Turtle Terrapene carolina carolina Six Lined Race Runner Cnemidopherus sexlineatus Southeastern Five Lined Skink Eumeces inexpectatus Green Anole Anolis caroliniensis caroliniensis Birds Little Blue Heron Florida caerulea Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Snowy Egret Egretta thula Louisiana Heron Hydranassa tricolor Green Heron Butorides virescens Osprey Pandion haliaetus Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Killdeer Charadrius vociferus Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Ground Dove Columbigallina passerina Common Flicker Colaptes auratus Red-Bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Sphyrapicus varius Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens Tree Swallow Iridoprocne bicolor Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata Common Crow Cornus corac House Wren Troglodytes aedon Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Marsh Wren Telmatodyles palustric Mockingbird Mimus polyglottus American Robin Turdus migratorius 18-9 METROI:G. 590-298.06 I WILDLIFE SPECIES (Cont.) Birds (Cont.) COMMON NAME Eastern Bluebird Red-eyed Vireo Yellow-throated Warbler Pine Warbler Common Yellow-throat Eastern Meadowlark Red-winged Blackbird Common Grackle Cardinal Rufous-sided Towhee Savannah Sparrow Chipping Sparrow Song Sparrow Mammals Opossum Easter Mole Raccoon Cotton Mouse Hispid Cotton Rat Eastern Cottontail Rice Rat Florida Mouse Armadillo METR01:G 18-10 SCIENTIFIC NAME Sialia sialis Vireo olivaceus Dendroica dominica Dendroica inns Geothylpis trichus Sturnella magna Agelaius phoeniceus Quiscalus quiscula Cardinalis cardinalis Pipilo erythropthalmus Passerculus sandwichiensis Spizella passerine Melospiza melodia Didelphis marsupialis Scalopus aquaticus Procyon lotor Peromyscus gollypinus Sigmodon hispidus Sylivilagus floridanus Oryzomys palustris Peromyscus floridanus Dasypus novemcinctus 590-298.06 19. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES A. ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE? IF SO, DESCRIBE AND LOCATE ON MAP D. DOCUMENTATION MAY BE ATTACHED IN THE FORM OF A LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE, DIVISION OF,ARCHIVES, HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT, INDICA- TING THE NEED FOR, OR RESULTS OF, AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SURVEY. There are no known historical or archeological sites on the develop- ment site. A professional archeological resource survey has been conducted on the project site, and the results of this survey are being made available in a separate report to the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the City of Clearwater. B. IF ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES WERE LISTED UNDER (A) ABOVE, PROVIDE A STATEMENT AS TO THE STEPS THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS, WHERE APPROPRIATE. No archaeological resources have been found on site; however, should archeological resources be located during project construction, the applicant agrees that the ultimate disposition of such resources would be determined in cooperation with the Division of Archives and I the City of Clearwater. 19-1 METR02:0 590-298.06 I I UESTION_ 20. ECONOMY: EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE. BREAK DOWN BY TYPE (LABOR, MATERIALS, PROFES- SIONAL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OVERHEAD, ETC.), AND ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENT OF THESE EXPENDITURES WILL BE SPENT WITHIN THE REGION. FOR LABOR, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES DURING EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. Construction expenditures and employment for the Park Place develop- ment are estimated in Table 20-1.' Project development costs are expected to total $91.6 million for the nine-year construction period, with employment averaging 155 persons. An estimated 96 percent of all construction phase expenditures are expected to occur within the Tampa Bay Region due to the project's central location in the region and the ready availability of a regional construction labor force and materials suppliers. B. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROJECT THE NUMBER OF NON- CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYEES AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE, USING APPROPRIATE DIVISION AND TWO-DIGIT (I.E. MINING-METAL MINING, RETAIL TRADE-FOOD STORES, SERVICES-BUSINESS SERVICES, ETC.). INCLUDE ESTIMATED ANNUAL PAYROLL. IF THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WILL VARY SEASONNALLY, SPECIFY. Table 20-2 estimates the number of permanent employment positions that will be available in Park Place at the end of each development phase. Estimated payroll for the final year of each phase is also presented. At build-out, Park Place will employ over 4,900 Persons and generate an annual payroll of $62 million. With good access from both sides of Tampa Bay, retail and office activities are expected to draw 20-1 METR02:V 590-298.06 a Mao M M M"' TABLE 20-1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE EXPENDITURES AND EMPLOYMENT - PARK PLACE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PHASE IMPACTS REGIONAL IMPACTS PHASE PHASE PHASE PROJECT I II III TOTAL AMOUNT PERCENT OF TOTAL RETAIL DEVELOPMEN11) 1. Expenditures Labor $ 1,300 $ 2,090 $ 2,610 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 100 Materials 1,920 3,070 3,840 8,830 8,830 100 Professional Services .480 770 970 2,220 2,000 90 Administration/Overhead 650 1,030 1,290 2,970 2,380 80 TOTAL $ 4,350 $ 6,960 $ 8,710 $20,020 $19,210 96 2. Construction Employment Average for period 20 35 45 35 35 OFF ICE DEVELOPMEN11) 1. Expenditures Labor $ 6,230 $ 7,800 $ 7,440 $21,470 $21,470 100 Materials 9,160 11,470 10,950 31,580 31,580 100 Professional Services 2,300 2,890 2,760 7,950 7,160 90 Administrative/Overhead 3,070 3,850 3,670 10,590 8,470 80 TOTAL $20,760 $26,010 $24,820 $71,590 $68,680 96 2. Construction Employment Average of period 105 130 125 120 120 COMBINED RETAIL/O[FJCE 1. Expenditures Labor $ 7,530 $ 9,890 $10,050 $27,470 $27,470 100 Materials 11,080 14,540 14,790 40,410 40,410 100 Professional Services 2,780 3,660 3,730 10,170 9,160 90 Administrative/Overhead 3,720 4,880 4,960 13,560 10,850 80 TOTAL $25,110 $32,970 $33,530 $91,610 $87,890 96 2. Construction Employment Average for period 125 165 170 155 155 Dollar amounts are in thousands, constant 1982 values METR02:M TABLE 20-2 PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT AND PAYROLL BY PHASE(1) PARK PLACE SIC CATEGORY. RETAIL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE DEVELOPMENT COMBINED RETAIL/OFFICE I II III I II III I II III 53 General Merchandise 75 75 75 - - - 75 75 75 54 Food Stores 15 50 90 - - - 15 50 90 55 Automotive - 5 5 - - - - 5 5 56 Apparel and Accessories 75 200 350 - - - 75 200 350 57 Furniture and Household 10 80 165 - - - 10 80 165 58 Eat and Drink 10 50 75 - - - 10 50 75 59 Miscellaneous 65 175 330 - - - 65 175 330 FINANCE, INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE 60-62 Finance & Securities 63-64 Insurance 65 Real Estate SELECTED SERVICES 72 Personal Services - 15 35 73 Business Services - - - 78-79 Recreation & Amusement - 10 25 80 Medical Services - - - 81 Legal Services - - - 82-83 Educational & Social - - - 89 Arch., Eng. & Acctg. - - - 94-96 Public Administration - - - TOTAL EMPLOYED 250 660 1,150 ANNUAL PAYROLL (Thousands in 1982 Dollars) $2,300 $6,100 $10,600 (1) See Appendix 20-A For estimating methods and assumptions POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. METR02:K 55 145 225 130 295 415 30 65 65 690 1,500 2,300 10 20 65 55 145 250 20 45 60 100 210 325 10 45 65 55 145 225 130 295 415 30 65 65 - 15 35 690 1,500 2,300 - 10 25 10 20 65 55 145 250 20 45 60 100 210 325 10 45 65 1,100 2,470 3,770 $14,900 .$33,600 $51,400 1,350 3,130 4,920 $17,200 $39,700 $62,000 r' employees from both Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties; but Pinellas, particularly Clearwater and other mid-county communities, will be the primary impact areas. I No significant seasonal fluctuations in employment levels are anti- cipated. Part-time employment will occur primarily in retail activities and will average about 2-3 percent of total project employment in most periods. Retail Development Retail activities will account for approximately 23 percent of total project employment. The applicant is considering several alternative retail development concepts, none of which follows the typical shopping center profile of prospective tenant composition. The concept used for projecting employment and payroll envisions develop- ment of a specialty retail complex featuring a large number of smaller shops offering quality lines of clothing, jewelry, home furnishings, crafted goods and miscellaneous goods. The combined strength of these activities, when offered in a unique physical setting, has the potential to draw from the major residential centers throughout the Bay Area, as well as from complementary retail attrac- tions such as Clearwater Mall. Office Development Firms serving regional or national markets are expected to become the primary office tenants at Park Place due to its centrality to major business growth centers and ready access to Tampa International Airport. Corporate regional headquarters and companies providing 20-4 METR02:V 590-298.06 I services to other businesses are key targets that should create new employment opportunities rather than relocation of existing activi- ties. C. FOR ALL TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. FOR NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, ALSO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION, PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. An approximate distribution of construction employees and permanent employees according to annual income,earned is presented in Table 20-3. Persons with annual earnings below $5,000 generally indicate part-time employment in retail activities. Assumptions used in preparing Tables 20-2 and 20-3 are shown in Table 20-4. I D. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INDICATE WHETHER NON-CONSTRUCTION ' EMPLOYMENT IN THE PROJECT REQUIRES SPECIALIZED SKILLS OR TRAINING. WILL ANY EMPLOYEES REQUIRE TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED SKILLS AT EDUCA- TIONAL FACILITIES IN THE REGION? ARE SUCH TRAINING PROGRAMS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE? Retail activities will primarily be smaller specialty shops. Many will be run by proprietors who have previous retail experience or who can gain retail management training at local universities and business schools. Franchised stores often provide manager training for their employees. Clerks, cashiers and stock handlers can be drawn from the experienced regional labor force, and on the job training can be provided to new labor force entries under the close supervision that is often possible in small establishments. 20-5 METR02:V 590-298.06 TABLE 20-3 EMPLOYMENT INCOME DISTRIBUTION I. CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT BY INCOME GROUP RETAIL CONSTRUCTION OFFICE CONSTRUCTION COMBINED RETAIL/ OFFICE CONSTRUCTION I II III I II III I II III INCOME LEVEL (2) Under $5,000 0 0 0 0 0 $5,000-6,999 0 0 0 1 1 $7,000-9,999 3 4 6 13 16 $10,000-14,999 6 11 14 33 40 $15,000-24,999 9 16 20 46 59 $25,000 and over 2 4 5 12 14 TOTAL 20 35 45 105 130 II. PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT BY INCOME GROUP 125 125 165 170 RETAIL CONSTRUCTION OFFICE CONSTRUCTION I II III I II III (2) INCOME LEVEL Under $5,000 15 40 70 0 0 0 $5,000-6,999 70 175 300 95 220 330 $7,000-9,999 85 220 380 210 465 710 $10,000-14,999 60 170 305 545 1,225 1,865 $15,000-24,999 15 40 70 185 410 635 $25,000 and over 5 15 25 65 150 230 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 16 16 20 22 39 39 51 53 56 55 75 76 14 14 18 19 COMBINED RETAIL/ OFFICE CONSTRUCTION I II III 15 40 70 165 395 630 295 685 1,090 605 1,395 2,170 200 450 705 70 165 255 TOTAL 250 660 1,150 1,100 2,470 3,770 1,350 3,130 4,920 (1) See Appendix 20-A for estimating methods and assumptions. (2) 1982 Dollars POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. 20-6 METR02:J 3. Income Distribution a. Income distribution for construction employment was based on general distribution reported for a Tampa construction company in 1979. After inflating wage levels to a 1982 value, percentage distribution used in each phase was found to be as follows: ' -Under $5,000 -- 0.0 percent -$ 5,000 - 6,000 -- 0.5 percent -$ 7,000 - 9,999 12.5 percent -$10,000 - 14,999 31.0 percent -$15,000 - 24,999 -- 45.0 percent -Over $25,000 -- 11.0 percent b. Permanent employment income distribution was approximated by grouping uses with similar average incomes and assuming a distribution for employees in those groups: RANGE OF SIC GROUPS DISTRIBUTION MEAN WAGE IN RANGE 0-5 5-7 7-10 10-15 15-25 25+ RETAIL PERCENT $ 5 - 7,000 58 30 34 22 11 2.5 0.5 $ 7 - 10,000 53, 54, 56, 59, 72, 78-79 5 28 36 24 5 2 $10-15,000 55, 57 1 11 21 49 14 4 OFFICE $10,-15,000 60-62, 65, 73, 82-83 0 10 20 51 15 4 $15-25,000 63-64, 80, 81, 89, 94-96 0 6 16 46 21 11 i 20-8 METR02:I 3. Income Distribution a. Income distribution for construction employment was based on general distribution reported for a Tampa construction company in 1979. After inflating wage levels to a 1982 value, percentage distribution used in each phase was found to be as follows: ' -Under $5,000 -- 0.0 percent -$ 5,000 - 6,000 -- 0.5 percent -$ 7,000 - 9,999 12.5 percent -$10,000 - 14,999 31.0 percent -$15,000 - 24,999 -- 45.0 percent -Over $25,000 -- 11.0 percent b. Permanent employment income distribution was approximated by grouping uses with similar average incomes and assuming a distribution for employees in those groups: RANGE OF SIC GROUPS DISTRIBUTION MEAN WAGE IN RANGE 0-5 5-7 7-10 10-15 15-25 25+ RETAIL PERCENT $ 5 - 7,000 58 30 34 22 11 2.5 0.5 $ 7 - 10,000 53, 54, 56, 59, 72, 78-79 5 28 36 24 5 2 $10-15,000 55, 57 1 11 21 49 14 4 OFFICE $10,-15,000 60-62, 65, 73, 82-83 0 10 20 51 15 4 $15-25,000 63-64, 80, 81, 89, 94-96 0 6 16 46 21 11 i 20-8 METR02:I 1 Educational and training needs of the office labor force will depend on the type of tenants who are attracted to the project. Major companies may be drawn here from outside the region by this area's growing pool of skilled electronic data processing and communications workers. Area universities are geared to this growing field, and the large companies provide advanced or specialized training for their employees. Tampa Bay's emergence as a regional insurance r center also may influence project tenancy of new companies who I benefit from the availability of an experienced labor force. E. ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE NON-CONSTRUCTION, PERMANENT EMPLOYEES WILL BE FOUND LOCALLY, AND WHAT PERCENTAGE MUST BE DRAWN FROM OUTSIDE THE REGION. IF THESE PERCENTAGES WILL VARY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIFE, SPECIFY. Retail activities, are expected to draw virtually all of their employ- ment from the regional labor force, mostly from mid-Pinellas County, but extending also to Hillsborough County and other parts of Pinellas. The exception may be franchise outlets or national chains who send experienced people in to train new managers and other employees, and to oversee operations during the start-up period. About 15-20 percent of the initial office employees are expected to be key personnel of major corporations who are relocated from other offices to begin operations in the Tampa Bay Area. Recruitment from the regional labor force will account for the remainder. Overtime, all positions will be held by permanent residents of the Tampa Bay region. 20-9 METR02:V 590-298.06 F. WHAT WILL BE THE LOSS OF AGRICULTURAL OR FORESTRY RESOURCES ON THE SITE AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT? REFER TO EXISTING LAND USE (MAP D), PROPOSED MASTER PLAN (MAP H) AND RESPONSE TO QUESTION 12-B. SPECIFY LOSSES OF ACREAGE, ANNUAL CROP YIELD, DOLLAR VALUES, ETC. I There are presently no agricultural or forestry production activi- ties on the project site. The 26 acres of pines and 42 acres of oaks and mixed hardwoods are not extensive enough or of sufficient quality to warrant major commercial cutting, and the applicant intends to incorporate these areas as elements of the park-like development setting wherever practical. G. IF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONTAIN A RESIDENTIAL ELEMENT, SPECIFY PERCENTAGE OF DEMANDS FOR EMPLOYMENT, RETAIL TRADE AND SERVICES, GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTS; THAT WILL BE SATISFIED WITHIN THE PROJECT (I.E., THROUGH THE PROVISION OF OTHER LAND USES ON THE SITE, ETC.) I No residential development is planned for this project. H. WILL THE PROJECT RECEIVE ASSISTANCE FROM FEDERAL, STATE OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAMS? IF SO, FROM WHAT AGENCY AND WHAT IS THE AMOUNT? There are not plans at present to use public assistance program funds for the development of this project. I. HAS A MARKET STUDY BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, A COPY SHOULD BE ATTACHED. IF NOT, DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS HOW THE DEMAND FOR THIS PROJECT WAS DETERMINED. I A preliminary investigation of general retail and office development ' activity was prepared for this project, but its scope was limited to 20-10 METR02:V 590-298.06 establishing a broad overview of growth potentials and development opportunities in the region. Recent trends clearly point to the Tampa Bay Area's emergence as one of the Sunbelt's most active growth centers, with high-tech industries, electronic software and communications, and insurance leading the way for diverse economic growth. Business and population growth is balanced on both sides of Tampa Bay. Due to its strategic location with good access to the major business and population growth centers, the Park Place site's strongest potentials are more closely associated with this areawide growth than with the goods and service needs of the immediate site vicinity. The preliminary concept for retail and office development at Park Place addresses that potential in the following manner: ° A major retail specialty center is planned. Unlike the nearby regional shopping malls, this center will rely on a unique concentration of specialty stores in an attractive setting to draw shoppers from a broad market area. The central location offers the potential, but it will be the unusual character of the complex itself that will create demand for a special trip destination. This character will also attract shoppers patron- izing local retail centers by providing complementary retail opportunities to the benefit of both Park Place and surrounding retail establishments. ° The large amount of office space to be provided will be suited to major corporations desiring a prestigious, high-visibility 20-11 METR02:V 590-298.06 r setting with good access to several business centers and to regional air facilities. By creating a high-quality setting, Park Place can help to attract large firms to the Tampa Bay Area who are considering relocation or expansion to the Sunbelt. With Pinellas County showing more balanced business and resi- dential growth in recent years, the site may also attract local firms who do business on both sides of the bay and desire a more central location with respect to their clients. The early analyses generally established the development potential ' and determined that leasing rates and vacancy levels suggest a feasible project. More detailed studies will be undertaken later to examine demand for specific types of retail uses and to identify prospective office tenants toward which marketing strategies may be oriented. J. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX YIELD FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DURING EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE ALL ASSUMPTIONS AND STANDARDS, INCLUDING ASSESSED VALUE, EXEMPTIONS, MILLAGE RATE, ETC. The average annual ad valorem tax yield to Pinellas County, the City of Clearwater and the Pinellas County School Board in each develop- ment phase and after buildout is estimated in Table 20-5. Methods and assumptions used in preparing estimates are as follows: 1. Assessed Value of Land and Improvements -- State law requires assessment of property at full market value. Valuation proce- dures, however, use methods which result in values that fall somewhat below full market value. For Table 20-4, it was 20-12 ' METR02:V 590-298.06 w w r r w r w w r w r w w? w r w? r w TABLE 20-5 AD VALOREM TAX ESTIMATES(1) PARK PLACE RETAIL OFFICE RETAIL/OFFICE COMBINED I II III I II III I II III 1. ASSESSED VALUE, END OF PHASE A. Land and Improvements $ 5,000 $13,000 $22,800 $23,700 $53,300 $81,600 $28,700 $66,300 $104,400 B. Personal Property (does not include inventory) 400 1,100 1,900 3,000 6,700 10,200 3,400 7,800 12,100 TOTAL $ 5,400 $14,100 $24,700 $26,700 $60,000 $91,800 $32,100 $74,100 $116,500 II. AD VALOREM TAXES: AVERAGE ANNUAL YIELD FOR PHASE A. County Government , ($7.4967 per $1,000) $ 22 $ 73 $ 145 $ 104 $ 325 $ 569 $- 126 $ 398 $ 714 B. School Board ($8.112 per $1,000) 24 79 157 112 352 616 136 431 773 C. City of Clearwater ($4.1820 per $1,000) 12 41 81 58 181 317 70 99 398 TOTAL III. AD VALOREM TAXES: ANNUAL AFTER BUILD-OUT A. County B. School Board C. City of Clearwater TOTAL $ 58 $ 193 $ 983 $ 274 $ 858 $ 1,502 $ 332 $ 1,051 $ 1,885 $ 185 $ 688 $ 873 200 745 945 103 384 487 $ 488 $ 1,817 $ 2,305 METR02:M assumed that assessed value would be at roughly 80 percent of project market value, which includes: land costs; projected construction phase costs (Table 20-1); and an assumed profit (a percent above costs that would be investment return in a build- sell arrangement). No property exemptions were assumed. 2. Personal Property -- Retail and office equipment and furnishings are taxed as personal property. Values are depreciated, but ' the value each year is taxed at about the same rate as real ' property. A value at roughly 10 percent of the assessed valuation of retail buildings and 15 percent of office buildings is assumed here to represent a conservative estimate of the average depreciated value of personal property. 3. Millage Rates -- Millage rates for Pinellas County, the Pinellas County School Board and the City of Clearwater in 1981-82 were used and held constant for the development period. S 4. Ad Valorem Tax Computation -- Average annual tax yield is approximated by averaging the amounts derived when millages are applied to the project's estimated assessed values at the I beginning and end of each development phase. K. ESTIMATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COSTS THAT WILL BE BORNE BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NOT PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. The following sections identify general types of facilities needs that could require substantial one-time expenditures in order to provide basic urban services to Park Place. The development .approval process provides local government the opportunity to determine how these expenditure needs can be met, and it is not 20-14 METR02:V 590-298.06 r ? realistically possible for the applicant to anticipate what M conclusions local governments may reach as to funding approaches or appropriate levels of public financial commitments. Consequently, ' this section can only indicate "typical" or possible approaches, rather than "proposed" methods, for financing improvements as a ' basis for estimating local government funding requirements to serve this project. 1. Water and Sewer Water and sewer services will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The developer will pay for installation of on-site service lines. No new off-site improvements are anticipated in order to serve the project, but the project will generate about ' $400,000 in hook-up and environmental impact fees which will pay for connection to the system and use of capacity of treat- ment plants and transmission lines. User charges cover operat- ing costs. 2. Drainage The developer will pay on-site drainage costs which will result in minimal impacts on off-site facilities. Any modifications that are required for off-site public facilities are typically ' funded from general revenues. 3. Solid Waste Solid waste collection will be provided by the City of Clearwater. Pinellas County is responsible for providing waste disposal facilities. Capital improvement needs can be funded directly from user charges or by borrowing based on projected user revenues. 20-15 METR02:V 590-298.06 ,I 4. Public Health, Safety and Welfare Fire, police, emergency medical service and health services are i financed from general and/or shared revenue sources. No major facilities (e.g. fire station, health center, EMS station) are expected to be needed to serve this project. Manpower and equipment costs can be funded by revenues generated by the project through property taxes ($487,000 per year to the City alone at build-out), utility and franchise taxes, or shared ' revenues from retail sales. 5. Schools Most school impact will be indirectly associated with the project as a result of the new employment it generates. Park r Pl ill t l $1 illi i ace w genera e near y m on n school taxes per year at build-out, and new residents also pay taxes on their homes. Employees drawn from out of state will not be eligible for the $25,000 homestead exemption on school taxes for the first five years. 6. Transportation Costs The developer will construct all on-site roadways. Improve- ments to the off-site street network are paid for through a combination of local, state and federal funding sources. Local shares are typically raised from general sources, special ' assessments, shared gas tax revenues and/or impact fees or charges. Impact fees, when charged on a unit basis that can equitably distribute the cost burden among all who use the system, pose a means of financing capital improvements to 20-16 METR02:V 590-298.06 r augment the other' sources. Development regulation procedures of many local governments, however, are only geared to assessing impacts of major projects. They frequently require identified costs to be at least partly defrayed by impact charges that are imposed only on these types of development, even though the development typically generates revenues at the same per-unit rate as uses in other developments. t 20-17 METR02:V 590-298.06 r ' 21. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT A. AS STIPULATED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION PROCESS, THE APPLICANT AGREED TO PRESENT TWO LETTERS IN LIEU OF THE ADA QUESTIONS. THE FIRST LETTER, PRESENTED IN APPENDIX I, IS FROM THE APPLICANT REQUESTING THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REVIEW THE PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR SERVICE BASED ON PROJECT PHASING, AND REQUESTING A RESPONSE AS TO THE CITY'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE TREATMENT. THE SECOND LETTER, EXHIBIT 21-1, IS THE CITY'S RESPONSE REGARDING SERVICE TO THE PROJECT The project would be entirely served by existing wastewater treatment plants owned and operated by the City of Clearwater. A recently constructed north interceptor force main and pumping station will provide the City the ability to divert flows from the East plant, which is operating near permitted capacity, to the Northeast plant which is well below capacity. This force main is scheduled to become operational in July 1982, upon which the City's present ' administrative moratorium on new flows to the East plant will be lifted. Operation of the interceptor will divert approximately ' 2.5 million gallons per day to the North plant. During preparation of this application, the Cities of Oldsmar and ' Safety Harbor inquired as to the effect of the project on the City of Clearwater's Northeast plant, particularly pertaining to the City of Safety Harbor's current allocation of 1 million gallons per day of the capacity of that plant. The City of Safety Harbor is r presently utilizing slightly more than half of its 1 million gallons per day allocation. When the north interceptor is operating, flow to the Northeast plant will be approximately 4.5 million gallons per ' day, - slightly over half its permitted capacity. Since wastewater generated on the Park Place site will be split to both Northeast and 21-1 METROI::J 590-298.06 1 I CITY MANAGER C I T Y OF C LE A R W A T E R POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33518 June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. ' Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: ' The City has reviewed your projections of wastewater flow for the Metro Development Corporation Office/Retail Park DRI. The project location and the topography of the project site suggests that flows from the project will be split to the north and south, with treatment at both the northeast and east plants. As you know, the capacity of these plants is based on a wastewater ' allocation permit from the Florida Department of Environmental. Regulation. Recognizing this, the approximate capacity of the northeast plant is 8.0'MGD; and the capacity of the east plant is 5.0 MGD. Present flows ' to the two plants are 1.48 MGD and 4.85 MGD, respectively. Based on these figures and present estimates of demand growth within the service areas, the City can accommodate the wastewater from the project through building in 1991. ' Regarding your inquiry about the City's present administrative moratorium on new flows to the east plant, this moratorium should be lifted in ' July of this year. We do not foresee any problems for your project in this respect. ' Two collection systems would serve the project. One consists of 8-inch and 10-inch lines which run west along Drew Street to U.S. 19, and then north to the north interceptor. The other consists of 12-inch and 15-inch lines along S.R. 60, which runs to the east plant. Both lines appear to have capacity available, and the probable north/south split from the project looks appropriate for the system; however, more detailed information will be needed during site plan review in order to definitely ascertain whether or not existing off-site collection will be adequate or will need improvements. If I can be of.further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, El abeth S. Haeseker Assistant City Manager EXHIBIT 21-1 "Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" East plants, the project's impact on the Northeast plant is estimated to be less than 0.1 mgd. Considering the available capacity at the Northeast plant, the project's impact on the Cities of Safety Harbor and Oldsmar will be negligible. 21-3 '-a METROI::J 590-298.06 1 1 22. PUBLIC FACILITIES: DRAINAGE A. AS IS PROVIDED FOR IN THE PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW ADOPTED BY TBRPC (APPENDIX 2) THE APPLICANT STIPULATES TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION FOR STORMWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY CONTROL. THE APPLI- CANT ALSO AGREES THAT THE COMPLETED APPLICATION TO FDER FOR A STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT WILL BE COPIED TO TBRPC AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE ABOVE STIPULATIONS SHALL D BE A CONDITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT. The Master Drainage Plan for the project is shown in Map G. The design objective for the Master Drainage Plan was to provide adequate and safe stormwater conveyance and storage capacity for the project, and to control stormwater quality through a series of cascaded biological and physical treatment opportunities. The specific methods by which these objectives are accomplished are discussed under the following topics: Swales Swales will be used wherever possible to convey stormwater to deten- tion areas and to major discharge points. The ability to incorporate swale systems into the Water Management Plan for the project will depend largely on the response of the City of Clearwater during the site plan review. Dry Detention Areas More than half of the stormwater detention capability for the project site is proposed to be dry detention areas. These areas will collect runoff from swale conveyances and detain it in grassy depressions so that as much runoff as possible can be percolated into the shallow groundwater table, thereby deriving both aquifer recharge and water 22-1 METROI:K 590-298.06 r quality control benefits. Dry detention areas will be located primarily within green belts and open space corridors, so that they may be viewed as green space with only occasional periods of inundation. Wet Detention Areas Three moderately sized wet detention areas are shown on the con- ceptual Master Drainage Plan. Each performs a particular function ?. related to its general location within the project site. The northern most detention area serves as a final stormwater collec- tion point prior to discharge from the site. The conceptual design provides for preserving a section of oak hammock above the detention area, with a filtration berm discharging into a collector swale and thence through the area of oaks to an off-site outfall, and ulti- mately to Alligator Creek. The east-central wet detention area is located adjacent to an exist- ing freshwater marsh. This area is designed to receive runoff via swale collectors, and then to divert waters collected in the wet detention area through the marsh prior to discharge beneath the east-west parkway road. r The southern most detention area serves as a final collection point for stormwater prior to discharge from the site and ultimately to Tampa Bay. This area also proposes a filtration berm prior to ultimate discharge. 22-2 METROI:K 590-298.06 It is anticipated that the wet detention areas would be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater requirements with shallow side slopes to a depth of 6 feet, and then steeper side slopes to a depth as deep as practicable. This is proposed in order to take advantage of the greater resiliancy of deep lakes to the potential for accelerated eutrophication sometimes observed in man-made lakes. Conservation Areas Two conservation areas are proposed to be incorporated in the storm- water management system. These include a portion of the oak hammock in the northwest corner of the project site, and the central portion of the freshwater marsh in the east-central area of the project site. The freshwater mar sh conservation area will include all of the sawgrass and saggitaria vegetation communities, a small portion of the marsh scrub community, and a larger portion of the marsh scrub - hardwood community. Portions of the latter two communities would be excavated to provide wet detention area. Water Control Structures Discharge from detention areas will be controlled by a system of control structures composed of various combinations of berms, weirs, and culverts. Rates of discharge will be limited to pre-development levels for the design storm event, and structures will be designed to ¦, comply with the water quality requirements of DER. jr, 22-3 METR01:K 590-298.06 23. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY A. AS STIPULATED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION PROCESS, THE APPLICANT AGREED `. TO PRESENT TWO LETTERS IN LIEU OF THE ADA QUESTIONS. THE FIRST LETTER, PRESENTED IN APPENDIX I, IS FROM THE APPLICANT REQUESTING THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REVIEW THE PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR SERVICE BASED ON PROJECT PHASING, AND INQUIRING AS TO THE CITY'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE. THE SECOND LETTER, EXHIBIT 23-1, IS THE CITY'S RESPONSE REGARDING ITS' ABILITY TO SERVE THE PROJECT. The potable water demand projections for project by phase were provided to the City of Clearwater in the letter contained in Appendix 1. The response from the City of Clearwater is shown in Exhibit 23-1. As the City's letter indicates, the existing water supply network surrounding the project site is more than adequate to provide ser- vice. Water pressures are also adequate, and long-term water supply for the City is competently provided through existing wells within the City and through additional water purchased from Pinellas County. It is likely that irrigation within the project site will be required in order to maintain the extensive landscaping and native vegetation. Irrigation water would be drawn from shallow wells penetrating the shallow water table, and from wet retention areas allowing recapture of nutrients which may escape dry detention areas. Water supply for fire protection is considered under Question 30: Fire. 23-1 METROI:L 590-298.06 Y C I T Y O F C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33518 ,# CITY MANAGER June 25, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The City of Clearwater currently has water mains adequate to serve the project proposed by Metro Development, Estimated total need of water for the project is .182 MGD. Existing ' are a 12-inch water main on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay along the perimeter of the proposed project, a 12-inch water main along the west side of Hampton Road the full length of the project, and a 16-inch water main on the north side of Drew Street along the northern perimeter of the proposed project. Water pressures in these lines are currently 55-60 p.s.i., which should be adequate for the complete project. Sincerely, Fiptantabet E1 S. Haeg e er As City Manager EXHIBIT 23-1 r "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" r 24. PUBLIC FACILITIES: SOLID WASTE A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. Solid waste volumes projected at completion of each phase of develop- ment are provided in Table 24-1. B. IF ON-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WILL BE PROVIDED, SPECIFY: At the present time it is anticipated that solid waste will be picked up by the City of Clearwater Sanitation Department, and disposed of at the Pinellas County Resource Recovery Plant. The types of waste generated by the project are anticipated to be primar- ily paper and paper products, which have a favorable BTU content per ton. It is possible that on site waste disposal through incineration, with heat recovery for heating water or possibly driving absorption chillers for air conditioning, will be a viable option. This option will be considered during detailed project design, in cooperation with the Pinellas County Solid Waste Department. I C. IF OFF-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITY OF THE FACILITIES SERVING THE DEVELOPMENT AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, I 24-1 METROI:M 590-298.06 r i TABLE 24-1 SOLID WASTE GENERATION (Cumulative) PROJECT COMPONENT PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III 1983-1985 1986-1988 1989-1991 T/D* Y/D** T/D Y/D T/D Y/D Retail 2.1 10.7 5.5 27.5 9.7 48.5 Office 1.5 7.4 3.3 16.7 5.1 25.6 Total 3.6 18.1 8.8 44.2 14.8 74.1 * T/D - Tons per day ** Y/D - Cubic yards per day REP64:X1 590-298.03 (3) A STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY'S OR FIRM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT (THE AGENCY OR FIRM MUST BE SUPPLIED WITH THE SOLID WASTE GENERATION TABLE IN (A) ?- ABOVE. ) Appendix I contains a letter addressed to the City of Clearwater requesting a response regarding ability to serve the project with solid waste collection services. Exhibit 24-1 is the response from the City of Clearwater. Exhibit 24-2 is a letter addressed to the Pinellas County Solid Waste Department requesting information on solid waste disposal. Exhibit 24-3 is the letter from the Pinellas County Solid Waste Department providing the response to the question above. 24-3 METROI:M 590-298.06 r C I T Y O F C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518 CITY MANAGER ,?. June 25, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The retail and office buildings proposed by Metro Development will most likely use front-end commercial containers provided by the City of Clearwater. Container capacity varies according to need, but most establishments use those which hold approximately four cubic yards. Pick-up by the Sanitation Division is on a regular schedule. For this project, three times per week would be a reasonable schedule to expect. The City currently has the capacity to serve all phases of the proposed project, estimated at 519 cubic yards of solid waste per week, using existing personnel and equipment. Sincerely, Elizabeth S, Haeseker Assistant City Manager EXHIBIT 24-1 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" I a P,4,,B Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. S J CONSULTING ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 2451 ENTERPRISE ROAD, CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33515-2012 • 813/796-7275 • TELEX 808435 June 16, 1982 Mr. Robert Becker Pinellas County Solid Waste Department 315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 Dear Mr. Becker: We have been retained by Metro Development Corporation to prepare an Applica- tion for Development Approval (ADA) for an Office/Retail Park to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of S.R. 60 and U.S. 19. This Appli- cation will be submitted to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council under the Development of Regional Impact review process. Analysis of solid waste gener- ated by project is a required element of the application; one portion of which requires a response to the following questions: IF OFF-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUT- LINING: 1. The projected excess capacities of the facili- ties serving the development at present and for each phase through completion of the project. 2. Any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity. 3. A statement of the agency's or firm's ability to provide service at all times during and after development (the agency or firm must be supplied with the solid waste generation table in [A] above). We understand that, assuming the project site will be annexed by the City of Clearwater, the City would provide Solid Waste Collection service; however, all waste would be disposed of under Pinellas County authority. We are, there- fore, providing solid waste generation projections to both governmental juris- dictions, and we will rely, on replys from both City and County in preparing the answer to the solid waste section of the ADA. The attached Table (24-1) shows solid waste generation by phase through buildout of the project. EXHIBIT 24-2 Mr. Robert Becker June 16, 1982 Page Two We would very much appreciate your response to the ADA question stated above, as well as any comments or suggestions you may have regarding solid waste dis- posal for the project. Very truly yours, POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. J. Kevin Henderson Project Manager JKH/ac Attachments cc: Mr. Larry Wolfe Mr. Ed Mazur 590-298.03/REP64:W COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEFZS CHARLES E. RAINEY, CHAIRMAN BARBARA SHEEN TODD, VICE-CHAIRMAN GABRIEL CAZARES JOHN CHESNUT, JR. BRUCE TYNDALL June 25, 1982 Mr. J. Kevin Henderson Project Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33516 PHONE (813) 448-3990 Clearwater, FL 33515-2012 Re: Metro Development Corporation Application°-- Dear Mr. Henderson: 82-0108 Pinellas County has the responsibility for providing disposal facilities for all solid wastes generated in the County. We are presently meeting this.responsibility through the availability of two major landfills. We also have under construction a substantial Resource Recovery Facility which, when opened in 1983, will process all processible solid wastes in the entire County (2,000 tons per day capacity). Our official financial statements indicate that sometime in 1987, there is likely to be excess processible wastes generated. Our present plans call for gradually increasing our landfill activities, as waste generation.will grow beyond the plant's capacity, until the next cycle of resource recovery investment can be justified. In the meantime, the County is actively pursuing the planning for transfer capacity to deliver wastes to the Resource Recovery Site (where the landfill is also located), and that transfer station network will easily handle all wastes included in the subject application through the year 2000 and beyond. If I car, be of further assistance, Ver tr ?y our• -: ?' =--_ Robert S. Becker Solid Waste Operations Manager RSB:1tl please let me know. EXHIBIT 24-3 PINELLAS COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 25. PUBLIC FACILITIES: ENERGY A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY ENERGY DEMANDS AT THE END OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: ELECTRICAL POWER, GAS, OIL, COAL, ETC. FOR ELECTRICAL POWER, ALSO PROVIDE THE PEAK HOUR DEMAND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. Projections of average daily electrical demand and peak hour elec- trical demand are provided in Table 25-1. These projections assume that the project would be served solely by electricity, however, natural gas is also available to the project site through the City of Clearwater Gas Transmission System. Given the energy efficiency of natural gas as a source of heat at end-use points, it would be desirable to use natural gas for such purposes as heating water. Although projections of gas use cannot be made at the present stage of project planning, any gas utilized would displace electricity, to the overall benefit of the region's energy source mix. B. IF THERE IS TO BE AN ON-SITE ELECTRICAL GENERATING FACILITY (POST- CONSTRUCTION) WHAT IS ITS CAPACITY AND USE? There are no on-site electrical generating facilities planned for the project. C. IF ELECTRICAL POWER IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM AN OFF-SITE SOURCE, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE ELECTRICAL GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, (3) A STATEMENT OF THE SUPPLIER'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. (THE SUPPLIER MUST BE PROVIDED WITH ELECTRICAL POWER DEMAND INFORMATION IN (A) ABOVE.) 25-1 METROI:N 590-298.06 TABLE 25-1 PROJECTED ELECTRICAL ENERGY DEMAND (Cumulative) PROJECT COMPONENT PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III 1983-1985 1986-1988 1989-1997 ADD* PD** ADD PD ADD PD Retail 1,980 600 5,148 1,560 9,108 2,760 Office 9,657 2,610 21,756 5,880 33,300 9,000 Total 11,637 3,210 26,904 7,440 42,408 11,760 * ADD - Average Daily Demand (KWH) ** PD - Peak Demand (KW) ? v rte. i r -; REP64:U1 590-298.05 I I Florida Power Corporation would service the project. Correspondence requesting a response from Florida Power to this portion of the ADA is shown in Exhibit 25-1. Exhibit 25-2 shows correspondence received from Florida Power Corporation indicating their ability to serve the I project. D. WHAT CONSIDERATIONS RELATIVE TO ENERGY CONSERVATION HAVE BEEN INCOR- PORATED INTO THE SITE PLANNING, BUILDING DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT SELEC- TION FOR THIS PROJECT? Site planning for the project is in the very preliminary stages, and building design has yet to be initiated. Equipment selection will be incorporated into the building design process. In response to energy conservation considerations, the following concepts represent a list of useful ideas which will be used during the site planning and building design processes as development goals and guidelines. Site design considerations will include maximal retention of native vegetation, to assist in shading parking lots and open space areas, l and to minimize requirements for irrigation, fertilization, and pesticide use. An internal system of pathways for pedestrian and bicycle use will provide an alternative to automobile travel internal to the site. The close proximity of office and retail space will !also encourage pedestrian movement as opposed to use of automobiles. ;Building orientation will be considered during site planning and building design, in order to minimize the detrimental effects of excess heat gain on east and west building faces. 25-3 METROI:N 590-298.06 II P LB Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. I STJ CONSULTING ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 2451 ENTERPRISE ROAD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33515.2012 • 813/796-7275 • TELEX 808435 June 15, 1982 Mr. Bruce Power Clearwater Engineering Department Florida Power Corporation P. 0. Box 33101 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Dear Mr. Power: We have been retained by Metro Development Corporation to prepare an Applica- tion for Development Approval (ADA) for an Office/Retail Park to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of S.R. 60 and U.S. 19. This Application will be submitted to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council under the Development of Regional Impact review process. Analysis of future energy demands associated with the project is a required element of the application; one portion of which requires a response to the following questions: IF ELECTRICAL POWER IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM AN OFF-SITE SOURCE, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: 1. The projected excess capacities of the elec- trical generation facility and transmission line to which connection will be made at present and for each phase through comple- tion of the project. 2. Any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity. 3. A statement of the supplier's ability to provide service at all times during and after development. In the present case, Florida Power Corporation would be requested to serve the project. The attached Table (25-1) shows electrical energy demand projections by phase through buildout of the Park. Also attached are exhibits showing the project location, Master Concept Plan, and adjacent land uses; and a narrative description of the park. EXHIBIT 25-1 t t s i Mr. Bruce Power June 15, 1982 Page Two We would very much appreciate your response to the ADA question stated above, as well as any suggested refinements to our electrical demand projections. Thank you. Sincerely, POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. J. Kevin Henderson Project Manager JKH/ac Attachments cc: Mr. Larry Wolfe Mr. Ed Mazur 590-298.05 REP64:V ;j F" JUL 2 1982 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 Florida Power CORPORATION June 30, 1982 1 L"'b Mr. J. Kevin Henderson Project Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Consulting Engineers & Planners 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Henderson: Per your request, I am happy to inform you that Florida Power Corporation has the necessary power facilities to connect your proposed office/retail park located in the N.E. quadrant of the intersecion of S. R. 60 and U. S. 19. If we may be of further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate in calling us. Sincerely, FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION Ernest E. Baker, Supervisor Distribution Engineering, Clearwater EXHIBIT 25-2 P.O. Box 1699, 2166 Palmetto Street, Clearwater, Florida 33517 Building design and equipment selection will consider such features as the use of double pane and solar reflectorized glass, atrium and skylite concepts for natural daylight contributions to interior spaces, sun screening and protective overhangs, task oriented lighting and photo-sensitive lighting level adjustments, high effi- ciency lighting, variable volume heating, ventilation and air condi- tioning systems including outside air economizers, and computer con- troled energy management systems to control peak demands and to optimize space conditioning . E. IF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED FOR THIS DEVELOP- MENT, WHY WERE THESE ALTERNATIVES SELECTED OR DISCARDED? (E.G., SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, ETC.) Alternative energy sources which will be considered for the project include solar water heating, water heating with natural gas, waste 1 heat recovery, and on-site resource recovery. These options will be evaluated during building design, when specific applications can be established and equipment options evaluated against one another on a life cycle basis. 25-7 METROI:N 590-298.06 I I i' 27. PUBLIC FACILITIES: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE A. DESCRIBE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE (INCLUDING ACREAGE) WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED ON SITE. LOCATE ON MAP H. WILL THESE AREAS OR FACILITIES BE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC? The Master Development Plan for Park Place designates 5.0 acres as parkland. The recreational facilities planned for the parkland will be geared to serve primarily the needs associated with this project. V Because of the urban oriented development program, these facilities will be passive in nature and may include plazas with pedestrian seating areas, textured paving, trellises, lush landscaping, and fountains. I In addition to the designated parkland on the Master Development Plan, an additional t 10 acres will be incorporated into the site development as landscaped open space. This open space will be in the form of buffer strips along the main internal roads and along the exterior boundaries of the project. Within these lushly land- scaped areas a pedestrian circulation system will interlink the park area and the various tracts. At the present time it is envisioned that a public easement will be provided across these open space areas to provide accessibility to the pedestrian pathway system. To the extent possible the pathway system will be designed to avoid the vehicular traffic system while providing the shortest and most direct route from one building to another. Bicyclists and joggers will be encouraged to use the system through provision of the meandering pathway system which will be accentuated by lush 27-1 METRO1:P 590-298.06 ' landscaping, street furniture, and a variety of topography created through earth berms and sculpturing. I Wherever possible desirable native vegetation will be saved. When these areas occur within the park area or the open space system, every effort will be made to design around and incorporate this vegetation to retain the inherent character of the site. Additional amenity value will be provided to the project by the internal lake and drainage system which will be incorporated into all aspects of the site design. This system in combination with the open space and park areas will also provide habitat for birds and small animals. The basic objective of the parkland/open space system at Park Place is to create an environment which can both satisfy some of the recreational needs of the project and create a desirable setting in terms of image and amenities for the Park. B. WILL THE DEVELOPMENT REMOVE FROM PUBLIC ACCESS LANDS OR WATERS PREVIOUSLY USED BY RESIDENTS OF THE REGION FOR HUNTING, FISHING, BOATING OR OTHER RECREATIONAL USES? SPECIFY. The development site is privately owned and currently provides no public access for hunting, fishing, boating, or other recreational use. 27-2 METR01:P 590-298.06 1 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i t 1 1 1 1 1 C. WILL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OR COUNTY? IF NOT, WHO WILL MAINTAIN THE FACILITIES? The final determination as to parkland dedication has not been resolved at this time. The current proposal is for the developer to own, improve and maintain the parkland and the open space system on the project site. Final dedication requirements will be determined at the local level during development approval negotiations. METROl:P 27-3 590-298.06 Il ' 28. PUBLIC FACILITIES: HEALTH CARE WHAT MEDICAL OR HEALTH CARE FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED ON SITE? SPECIFY ?. TYPE, SIZE, POPULATION TO BE SERVED, ETC., AND LOCATE ON MAP H. Health care facilities are not specifically planned within the project. As was agreed during the TBRPC pre-application process (see Appendix 2) the primary concern regarding health care facilities and the project is related to the City's ability to provide emergency medical service. Appendix 1 contains a letter requesting information on EMS facilities M from the City of Clearwater. Exhibit 30-1 (see Fire section) contains the City's response, indicating that the City maintains four EMS units, each with a three-man crew, and that the station nearest the project is approximately one quarter mile from the site. 28-1 ' METR01:Q 590-298.06 29. PUBLIC FACILITIES: POLICE WHAT POLICE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES, OR SITES WILL BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON-SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES OR FACILITIES, SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION, AND LOCATE ON MAP H. It is not intended that police protection facilities would be located on the project site. The City of Clearwater is anticipated to provide police protection to the project. A letter from the applicant to the City requesting information on the City's ability to provide police protection is shown in Appendix 1. The City's letter in response is provided in Exhibit 29-1. 29-1 METRO1:R 590-298.06 iSEp??F? 4 ? ?ArEa? CITY MANAGER June 24, 1982 C I T Y O'F C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33518 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh.&.Jernigan, Tac. 2451 Enterprise. Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The Clearwater Police Department provides police protection and law enforcement services to residents, husine.sses, and visi.toral.througlhout the corporate lt=ts.of.the City,. The Police Department is.staf fed with 175 sworn officers and 89 non-sworn. personnel,.. The officer/ population ratio to permanent residents is 1.8 officers per 1;QQQ._ Officers are distributed throughout the City in patrol zones established in accordance with statistical, data related to calls for service and other pertinent criteria. This ensures rapid.officer response to emergencies and patrol services. The department provides a full line of law enforcement service.that includes patrol, traffic enforcement; investigations, crime.preventlon,.security surveys, community relations., etc. Sincerely, Eli eth..S, Haeseker As Tistant City-Manager EXHIBIT 29-1 I "Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" 30. PUBLIC FACILITIES: FIRE WHAT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES, OR SITES WILL BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES OR FACILITIES, SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION, AND LOCATE ON MAP H. t The letter from the applicant requesting a response from the City of Clearwater regarding the ability to provide fire protection services is provided in Appendix I. The City's response is shown in Exhibit 30-1. It is not anticipated that fire protection services or facilities would be provided on-site. However, in response to concerns regarding adequate ' fire protection for the project, the four points listed in Exhibit 30-1 regarding a fire alarm system, sprinkler system, water mains of adequate size, and apparatus availability will all be coordinated with the City of Clearwater during later stages of project planning and development. 1 30-1 ' METROI:S 590-298.06 r'I 11 I CITY MANAGER C I T Y O F C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33518 June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager .Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. ' 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 ' Dear Ed: The proposed project by Metro Development will, by its magnitude, increase the demand for fire and EMS services from the Clearwater ' Fire Department. Effective fire protection for life safety and property protection will be required in the form of; ' 1. Complete supervised Fire Alarm System. 2. Supervised Sprinkler System. 3. 12" Water Mains to.provide adequate water supply for material fire loading within the structures. ' 4. Apparatus availability to the structures for effective fire and EMS emergencies. ' First assignment response to the development would be Fire Station Number Five, located approximately one-quarter mile south at 520 Sky Harbor. An engine with four firefighters and a rescue unit with three paramedics are based at this station. Fire Station Number Four, located at 1700 North Belcher, 2.9 miles northwest, will respond with a snorkle, squad truck, and an engine with a total complement of eight men. The Shift Commander (Captain) responds on all fires from Station Number One, 610 Franklin, 4.8 miles. Presently, the Clearwater Fire Department has four units equipped for ' advanced life support. All four units have three-man crews, of which Station Number Five is the closest. Response times for fire and EMS service fluctuates with various conditions, such as daylight hours compared to night hours, weather conditions, traffic, etc. An accurate ' response time for equipment arrival cannot be indicated due to the aforementioned conditions. However, the average response time for the department throughout. its Fire District is currently 3.5 minutes. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on me. Sincer ' Elizabeth. S. Haeseker Assistant City Manager EXHIBIT 30-1 ' ..EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" QUESTION 31. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES: TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS ?. A. USING MAP J AS A BASE, INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA (AS PREVIOUSLY DEFINED BY MAP J), INCLUDING ADT, PEAK-HOUR TRIPS, DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC LOAD, LEVEL- OF-SERVICE AND ROADWAY CAPACITY. WHAT IMPROVEMENTS OR NEW FACILI- TIES, WHICH WILL HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ARE PLANNED OR PROGRAMMED? ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY STATING THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INCLUDING BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONDITIONS; ' (2) THIS DESCRIPTION SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE LEVEL OF TRANSIT SERVICE. EXISTING HIGHWAY CONDITIONS Vehicular traffic to and from the Metro Development would use a ' number of the streets and highways in the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County. A description of the general street network, and the existing traffic volumes and characteristics, along with current traffic levels-of-service, are discussed in the following para- graphs. Street Network Local access streets, collector roadways and traffic arterials surround the identified development site (see Exhibit 31-1). U.S. 19 is the only facility within the traffic impact study area with (partially) controled access. This facility is a major north-south 1 arterial highway carrying a large percentage of through trips in the study area. North of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (State Route 60), U.S. 19 has been reconstructed to a six-lane cross section, while the south- ern section of U.S. 19 in the study area is currently being recon- structed to six travel lanes. 31-1 METR03:C 590-298.04 • MAIN ST • • ALLEN AVE • • 2L ENTERPRISE RD 2L J VIRGINIA T. a J J ¢ ? N w 9 • r i Y • ° u IN ST 2L SUNSET POINT RD. 2L 2L • 2L . MA B • z • ? m • • 2L J • W J • U • W PO • v cO?c DREW ST. 4L • 2L GREW ST. CLEVELAND ST. • 2L I • ? J GULF TO BAY BLVD. • 6L ~ GL DRUID RD. • 'E? ?R f • N t0 • ARN BLVD. F= • 2L • NURSERY RD 2L • ~ NURSERY RD. • u BELLEAI D 2L • a 2L J • Q • 0 Y W • • m • • e, a 4L 4L s9o • 0 • Jo • ? mP • • • • J • N • • 4L 4L 60 ? fr • • OLD TAMPA BAY • • LEGEND HAINES 2L - NUMBER OF MOVING LANES IN • BOTH DIRECTIONS BAYSN ORE RD. O • TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION • \ 00 METRO DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC • IMPACT AREA • • • • 4L O 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES STREET NETWORK INVENTORY EXHIBIT 31-1 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard is the second most heavily traveled highway in the area. This facili ty extends from Clearwater Beach eastward through the study area to Tampa. West of U.S. 19, Gulf-to-Bay ' Boulevard maintains six travel lanes with turn lanes at major inter- sections. East of U.S. 19, Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard operates with four through traffic lanes. A number of other arterials and collector streets parallel these two major north-south and east-west arterials. Hercules, Belcher, Old Coachman, McMullen-Booth and Bayshore are significant north-south roadways serving the area. These vary between two and four traffic lanes at midblock. East-west streets in the study area include S.R. 588 S R 590 D Cl l d D id N H ll i d B , . . , rew, eve an , ru , arn, ursery, e ea r an Roosevelt. Again, each of these streets paralleling Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard is composed of two to four traffic lanes. The local access streets in the study area were omitted from Exhibit ' it w 31-1 f i li A h i thi ill t ti tr ffi i l y. or s mp c s s o n n s us ra on, a c s gna s are typically located at the intersections of the stre ets carrying significant traffic volumes. Daily Traffic Volumes ' Average Daily Traffic volumes on the study area street network are monitored by the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Transportation. Current volumes are shown in Exhibit 31-2. From the illustration, it can be seen that U.S. 19 carries the largest number of vehicles per day, followed by Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The ' 31-3 METR03:C 590-298.04 1 SOURCE- CITY OF CLEARWATER , FUOT 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES EXIST. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-2 0 highest volumes along U.S. 19 occur between Drew and Coachman Road with nearly 64,000 vehicles per day. Daily volumes on Gulf-to-Bay are largest just west of Belcher, where nearly 52,000 vehicles per ' day were counted. Other highways parallelling each of these accom- modate significantly fewer vehicles throughout the day. Roosevelt and Belcher are the only other facilities in the study area carrying over 25,000 vehicles per day. Typically, other streets in the study area have an average daily volume of less than 20,000 vehicles per day. 1 Seasonal Traffic Variations Traffic volumes in the study area fluctuate with respect to time of ' the year. Traffic volumes in the months of January, February, March, April and December are higher for all street links. During the months of May, June, July, August and September, traffic volumes are below average. The months of October and November appear to best represent average yearly travel conditions. Table 31-1 identi- fies the percentage above or below average travel conditions for ' each month. These percentages were developed from data collected by Florida Department of Transportation permanent count recorders ' located in the study area. 1 Traffic Growth Trends The Florida Department of Transporation maintains seven permanent count stations within the study area. Ten year annual average 1 growth factors were calculated for each count station. Averaging these, the past ten-years exhibited an average traffic growth rate ' of 6.2 percent per annum. ' 31-5 METR03:C 590-298.04 Table 31-1 Seasonal Traffic Variations Percent Above or Below Month Annual Average January + 3.74 February + 7.27 March +14.64 April + 6.64 May - 3.80 June - 4.18 July - 5.56 August -12.19 September - 9.94 October + 0.90 November - 1.02 December + 3.51 Source: FDOT continuous count locations in study area. 31-6 METR03:H 590-298.04 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Daily traffic volumes in the study area peak between the hours of 7:00-8:00 A.M. and 4:30-5:30 P.M. Traffic volumes for each hour and each direction of travel are shown graphically in Exhibit 31-3 for two locations. These two locations are located approximately one- quarter mile east of the site on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and approxi- mately one-quarter mile north of the site on U.S. 19. As can be seen from the Gulf-to-Bay location (upper figure) the morning peak hour is significantly less than the afternoon peak hour. At this location, the morning peak hour amounts to 5.0 percent of the daily traffic volume, while the afternoon peak hour totals 8.4 percent of the daily value. Peaking characteristics on U.S. 19 are more distinct for the morning t peak hour than was the case for Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. During the morning peak hour, 6.2 percent of the daily traffic on U.S. 19 occurred, while the afternoon peak consisted of 7.4 percent of the daily traffic. The traffic in the morning peak shows southbound travel to be significantly more than the northbound traffic, while the reverse is true in the afternoon peak. This trend is character- istic of the home-to-work trip in the morning and the work-to-home trip in the afternoon in relation to the locations of major residen- tial and employment areas. Hourly vehicle counts were made for the afternoon peak hour at all major intersections within the study area. Morning peak hour turn counts were made at three intersections where ingress to the site 31-7 METR03:C 590-298.04 1 1 1 1 1 r i t r i H W J U_ S > 3500 3000 2500 2000 500 1000 1/4 MILE EAST Of SITE 500 EASTBOUND 0 12AM 2 4 6 8 10 12PM 2 4 6 8 10 12 HOUR BEGINNING 3500 3000 2500 2000 N W J V W > 1500 1000 500 0 12AM 2 4 6 8 10 12PM 2 4 6 8 10 12 HOUR BEGINNING SOU RCE: CITY OF CLEARWATER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPT. HOURLY TRAFFIC VARIATIONS EXHIBIT 31-3 GULF-TO- BAY BLVD . TOTA L WE STBOUND U. S . 19 I/ 4 MILE NO RTH OF SI TE TOT AL NO RTHBOUND - / SO UTHBOUN D \? 1 may be a potential problem. These morning counts include the inter- sections of U.S. 19 at Drew Street, U.S. 19 at Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. Morning and afternoon peak hour intersection counts were recorded in June of 1982. Because June is typically found to be below average in the seasonal traffic volume levels, the observed traffic counts were increased by 4.18 percent to represent average annual peak hour traffic conditions. Exhibit 31-4 (A and B parts) identify the annual average (factored) afternoon turning movements for 1982. Where morning turning movements were counted, they are shown in parentheses. Level-of-Service The quality of traffic service provided by a street system is mea- sured in terms of the capacity of the system versus the traffic volumes which use the system. The level-of-service concept is a standard means of expressing the types of traffic conditions associ- ated with various traffic volumes versus faclity capacity. There are six levels-of service, Levels A through F, which relate to driving conditions from best to worst, respectively. The character- istics of traffic flow for these various levels-of-service are summarized in Table 31-2. METR03:C In level-of-service "D", operating speeds are considered tolerable by the general public. As in similar urban traffic studies, level- of-service "D" was assumed as the lowest acceptable service level for the street network during peak periods. Traffic conditions 31-9 590-298.04 r r ri r 1982 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-4 PART B 1982 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-4 O ¢ G ¢ 2 Z O j C O m m < ¢ U ¢ Z J W V i 7 U J i Wm O 2 1 Q ?I Table 31-2 Level-of-Service Concept Level-of-Service A * Free flow conditions * Low volumes * High operating speed * Uninterrupted flow * No restriction on maneuverability * Drivers maintain desired speeds * Little or no delays Level-of-Service B * Stable flow condition * Operating speeds beginning to be restricted Level-of-Service C * Stable flow, but speed and maneuverability restricted by higher traffic volumes * Satisfactory operating speed for urban conditions * Delays at signals Level-of-Service D * Approaching unstable flow * Low speeds * Major delays at signals * Little freedom to maneuver Level-of-Service E * Lower operating speeds * Volumes at or near capacity * Unstable flow * Major delays and stoppages Level-of-Service F * Forced flow conditions * Low speeds * Volumes below capacity, may be zero * Stoppages for long periods because of downstream congestion 31-12 METR03:I 590-298.04 r worse than this service level may warrant street improvements, a diversion of traffic to other routes, and for other traffic manage- ment strategies. For average daily traffic level-of-service "C" M was assumed to be the lowest acceptable service level for the street network. Peak hour intersection levels-of-service were calculated using existing peak hour traffic volumes and intersection geometry. The methodology used in the level-of-service calculation utilizes "Criti- cal Movement Summation" described in detail in The Transportation Research Circular Number 212 - Interim Materials on Highway Capacity - January, 1980. Daily highway link capacity was calculated using intersection capa- city restraints at either end of the link (lane geometry, signal phasing and signal timing), the percentage of daily traffic occurring during the peak hour, the number of mainline traffic lanes in both directions, and characteristics concerning curb parking and lateral restrictions. This methodology is identical to that used to develop daily service volumes (capacities) in the Urban Transpor- ation Planning Study (UTPS), with the exception that data was entered by link whereas the UTPS procedure used general assumptions. Appen- dix III contains details of the procedure used to determine link capacities. Peak hour levels-of-service calculated for each intersection and 31-13 METR03:C 590-298.04 daily mainline effective levels-of-service are identified in Exhibit 31-5. As shown in this illustration, the intersections of U.S. 19 at S.R. 580, Countryside, and Roosevelt; Gulf-to-Bay at Belcher, and Drew at Belcher currently operate below level-of-service "D". Three intersections (U.S. 19 at Sunset Point, U.S. 19 at Coachman, and Gulf-to-Bay at McMullen-Booth) operate within level-of-service "D" today. The remaining intersections currently operate at level-of- service "C" or better during peak conditions. The mainline daily capacity considerations were also identified for critical locations. The highway section of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard between Hercules and Belcher is the only section operating at level- of-service "E". Mainline daily Ievels-of-service along U.S. 19 north of the site and sections of Drew Street west of U.S. 19 cur- rently operate. at level-of-service "D". Other roadway links in the study area are within level-of-service "C" or higher. EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS The Central Pinellas Transit Authority (CPTA) operates four bus routes within the transportation study area. The location of each route is shown in Exhibit 31-6. Table 31-3 describes the service characteristics for each route. Route 10 is one of the most heavily patronized routes in the CPTA system. The eastern terminus is at the Kapok Tree and the western terminus is beyond the study area on Clearwater Beach. During the 31-14 METR03:C 590-298.04 M MAIN ST. ALLEN AV E. S ENTERPRISE RD. i 3 Y a VIRGINI A R W J J Q x J 9 _ x A. m A A C . .;.;:' MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. 17-71 A 13 D / c 9 A ,o. A Q• C ro c N A. x ? 0T B ??+ C/C 40 C DREW ST. ST. CLEVELAND ST. .. V D CC A A A A GULF-TO-SAY BLVD. - - B AY BLVD 80 --- UL, DRUID RD ' /A . A A A A A A A A HA N sLw. A OLD TAMPA SAY P NURSERY RD. RD. -URSERY C BELLEAIR RD. A 7 LEGEND B) 9 - ? INTERSECTION - AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR EV OF SE ICE HAINES L EL RV c g AYSHORE RD. INTERSECTION MORNING/AFTERNOON Pit" HOUR LEVEL Of SERVICE W A Y1 u G C 1 DAILY LINK LEVEL Of SERVICE iJ J m A AREA OF DEFICIENCY' Y R. ROOSEVELT BLVD. 19 0 1/4 1/2 1 l SCALE IN MILES 1982 TRAFFIC LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-5 N' i 1 1 1 1 1 MAIN ST. 1 r? ALLEN AVE ENTERPRISE RD ?I 1 VIRGINIA T. 1 y 0 1? 2 r '? 19 S x • / 1 0 1 NS T P R MAIN S ?.unuuuuu / SU E OINT RD. 698 nunuuu? 1 VNN.i 1 O : m W Po DREW ST. DREW ST. ? , CLEVELAND ST ; 1 . 1 BAY BLVD. GULF- 4iULF' T ' BAY BLVD - _ - ! - - = . ?-? DRUID RD. J i ' HARN BLVD. OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD. NURSER ??? ll AR ppp mama MIMI 111111111411111 HAINES BAYSMORE RD. \ LEGEND W ROUTE NO. ROUTE LOCATION W x V 10 1 • ¦ W Y W m 13 1M. M/M.M.m.=. 18 uuaumuuouonnuuo 19 --------- E. BAY DR. ROOSEVELT BLVD 9 6B 0 1/4 I/2 SCALE IN MILES CPTA STUDY AREA ROUTES EXHIBIT 31-6 on N* M01*1 ? so M W Ift W, U M M, M` M am we no am Table 31-3 CPTA Study Area Service Characteristics Number of Buses Passing Site During Peak Traffic Hours Times of Service Approxima te Headways (Both Direc tions) General Days of Service Service Weekends & Number Route Termini Service Begins Ends Weekdays Holidays A.M. P.M. 10 Clearwater Beach All Week 6:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. 30 Min. 1 Hour 4 4 To Kapok Tree 13 Clearwater to All Week 7:15 A.M. 6:45 P.M. 1 Hour 2 Hours 1 1 Countryside Mall 15 Clearwater Mall All Week 10:00 A.M. 5:00 P.M. 2 Hours 2 Hours 0 0 to Safety Harbor 19 Clearwater Mall Mon.-Sat. 8:30 A.M. 5:30 P.M. 2 Hours N/A 1 2 to Tarpon Mall METR03:J r weekdays, it operates on 30 minute headways, with four buses passing the site on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard during the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. During the winter months when patronage is highest, ridership approaches the seating capacity during peak periods. This condition is defined as operating in level-of- service "C" by the Interim Material on Highway Capacity Transporta- tion Research Circular Number 212. During typical months, the peak transit ridership is generally less than one-half of the seated capacity, or level-of-service "A". A second route in the study area serving east-west travel needs is Route 13. This route has one terminus at Countryside Mall, and extends southward down U.S. 19 to Belleair Road before turning west into Clearwater. This route generally experiences ridership less than one-half of the capacity, or level-of-service "A". Headways for Route 13 are one hour on weekdays, with one bus passing the site in the morning and again in the afternoon peak hour. Route 15 travels from Clearwater Mall to Countryside Mall and Safety Harbor. Transit service along this route is within level-of-service "A". Headways on Route 15 are at two hour intervals with no buses presently passing the project site during either morning or evening peak travel hours. The final CPTA route to pass within the study area Route No. 19 , travels from Clearwater Mall to Tarpon Mall. Headways along this route are generally two hours. In the morning peak hour one bus 31-18 METR03:C 590-298.04 ?I passes the development location, while in the afternoon, service is increased and two buses pass 'the project site. As in most of the others, this route operates within level-of-service "A". Programmed Transportation Improvements Transportation planning officials from City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, and Florida Department of Transportation were contacted concerning the programmed transportation improvements within the study area. All agencies indicated no significant projects were currently funded; however, long range transportation improvements are planned beyond the yearly budgeted programs. Table 31-4 identi- fies a number of grade separations and highway widenings in the study area planned by the City, the County and the State within this decade. 31-19 METR03:C 590-298.04 go mom 2 M MM an soon =* M was= m axw aw Table 31-4 Transportation Improvement Program Responsible Agency Project Location FOOT Gulf-to-Bay Blvd.; between U.S. 19 and McMullen-Booth Rd. FOOT U.S. 19; Sunset Point Rd. to Countryside FDOT U.S. 19; South of Roosevelt to North of Haines Bayshore FDOT U.S. 19; South of Countryside to North of SR 580 Pinellas County Belleair Rd.; between Keene Rd. and Belcher Rd. Pinellas County Sunset Point-Rd.; between Keene Rd. and U.S. 19 Pinellas County McMullen-Booth Rd.; between Gulf- to-Bay Blvd. and Sunset Point Rd. Project Description Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Grade separation Grade Separation Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Widen from 2 to 4 lanes divided; with design allowing for 6 lane divided Pinellas County McMullen-Booth Rd.; between Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Sunset Point Rd. and SR 580 City of Clearwater Druid Rd.; between U.S. 19 Construct new 2 lane road and Belcher Rd. City of Clearwater Drew St.; between Hampton and Construct new 2 land road McMullen-Booth Rd. Sources: Transportation Improvement Program, Florida Department of Transportation City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Department ROW Acquisition Construction Date Date 1984-85 1989 1982-83 1982-83 1985-86 1985-86 1986-87 1988 or later 1984-85 1982-83 1984-85 1985-86 1982-83 1983-84 1983-84 METR03: K B. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT, ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF PERSON TRIPS NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (INCLUDING THROUGH TRIPS) WITHIN THE INTERNAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AS WELL AS THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA AT THE END I OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. STATE ALL STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE, TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, ETC. Development Within the Study Area Conversations with local planning and permitting officials indicate only one potential development within the site environs. A mobile home park is currently planned for a 100 acre site east of Hampton Road and north of S.R. 60. Maximum development of this tract shows 649 mobile home sites to be developed over a period of years. At the present time, final approval of this development has not been granted. l Potential person-trips and vehicle-trips to and from the mobile home park site were estimated based upon transit usage and vehicle occupancy in the region. Percentages of daily trips occurring during the peak hour were also estimated, in order to project peak hour trip characteristics. Table 31-5 identifies the trip I generation assumptions used. Based upon the identified trip generation assumptions, daily and peak hour trips were calculated for a complete buildout of the 31-21 METR03:M 590-298.04 ? r? ? ? rr .r r? t? rr err r r? err ? r r ?r r ?_ TABLE 31-5 MOBILE HOME PARK TRIP GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS DAILY DAILY DAILY EXTERNAL INTERNAL VEHICLE EXTERNAL TRIP END ASSUMPTION PERSON PERSON PERSON PERCENT OCCUPANCY A.M. PEAK P.M. PEAK TRIPS PER TRIPS PER TRIPS PER USING (PERSONS PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF UNIT UNIT UNIT TRANSIT PER VEHICLE) INBOUND TRIPS OUTBOUND TRIPS INBOUND TRIPS OUTBOUND TRIPS 8.0 7.0 1.0 4% 1.25 3.0 14.0 13.5 8.2 METR03:N mobile home park. The vehicle trips generated for daily and typical peak periods are shown in Table 31-6. These values concur with average trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Handbook. TABLE 31-6 MOBILE HOME PARK TRIP GENERATION NUMBER OF DAILY VEHICLE A.M. PEAK P.M. PEAK ?. TOTAL UNITS TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 649 3,490 50 245 240 140 General Traffic Growth A number of continuous traffic count stations are maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation within the defined transportation impact area. Over the past 10 years, these count stations recorded an average 6.2 percent annual growth rate. Assum- ing this trend would continue, future traffic volumes were calculated for 1985 (Phase I completion), 1988 (Phase II completion), and 1991 (Phase III completion). The average daily traffic volumes for each of these years are shown in Exhibits 31-7, 31-8, and 31-9. By comparing these daily traffic volumes with the existing volumes, it can be seen that the increases in traffic volumes are sizeable. The potential mobile home park would most likely be developed in a number of phases over a period of years. Under this assumption, it can be determined that the new traffic generated would be minor in comparison to the assumed background traffic growth. Therefore, the 31-23 METR03:M 590-298.04 N MAIN ST . ALLEN AVE. S 4,260 s4,z1o ENTERPRISE RD. 31,570 4,370 y 3 Y a VIR INI 1 5,600 i a J m 19 V J S A. 8,250 W m 20,810 MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. ,740 24,110 33 49,810 4,380 6,860 21, 360 c m i 22,560 A ; m 0v . ? 7 r0 Q ?q 19,720 19,860 j T6,410 qe 13,320 ? 40 V DREW ST. DREW ST CLEVELAND ST. 19,560 ax,leo 2I,190 9ULF-TO-SAY BLVD. GULF-TO- BAY BLVD. 80 ?l al, aoo DRUID RD. 27, 170 16,110 39, 210 60,210 NA BLVD. 9,090 OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD. NURSERY RD, 58,210 BELLEAIR RD. 16,380 12,690 xs,eao 33,340 HAINES BAYSHOR BNORE RD. c m ? W W W C W f=/ ?` Y J W m 54,930 AY R ROOSEVELT BLVD. 41,970 39,500 19 46,370 O 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES 1985 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES. EXHIBIT 31-7 r 1 1 N """III MAIN ST. I ALLEN AV E. ZZ 7 S 5,100 84,940 37,920 ENTERPRISE RD. 6,230 i 18 , 690 i VIRGINIA W a 19 V S IL 9.860 ? O 24,930 MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. 8.220 28 880 r 93,630 26,630 O 40,420 6,260 ,Q. N z6,9ao •? 7 a 16,990 ?qro 23,620 = 91,610 oQ M4a0 DREW ST. DREW T. CLEVELAND ST. 26,310 23,430 74,710 GULF- TO-BAY BLVD. GULF-TO - SAY BLVD. 60 ?- DRUID RD. 32,560 21,700 46,970 74,650 61.700 A N BLVD. OLD TAMPA BAY 10,690 NURSERY RD. NURSERY RD. " 67,340 9ELLEAIR RD. 19,660 31.940 15.200 NAINES \ 31,100 c z g B1Y9NORE R0. Y W Q W W O 66,610 E. BAY DR. ROOSEVELT BLVD. 60,280 47,320 19 37,950 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES 1988 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MAIN ST. r? ALLEN AVE. S ' TT.730 6,110 ENTERPRISE RD 45,270 6,260' r 3 i 22,370 VIRGINIA ¢ W 9 u 2 a 11,830 J • W m 29,640 0 / ¢ MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. 588 100,100 = r 9,840 34,570 48,380 30,920 C m ,? '590 a 30,920 6.280 A? N J 0 2 7 W PO' f 19,100 ?yo 26,270 26.050 mQ 109,660 c? DREW ST. DREW ST. CLEVELAND ST. 26,050 30,390 66.500 GULF-TO-BAY BLVD. GULF-TO- BAY BLVD. 60 ?- DRUID RD. .? 38.960 25,970 56.220 / 69,360 tJ73,850 HARN BLVD. 13.030 OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD NURSERY RD. 80.610 BELLEAIR RD 23,TT0 K 16,190 37, 230 HAINES o 47,610 ? \ BAYSNORE R0. W W ¢ W ? 78,780 Y m W 6B6 E. BAY DR. ROOSEVELT BLVD. 60,180 56.640 19 68 69,370 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES 1991 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-9 r proposed mobile home park generated traffic was assumed to be incorporated within the background traffic growth shown in Exhibits 31-7, 31-8 and 31-9. i C. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF VEHICLE TRIPS EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AT THE END OF EACH PAHSE OF DEVELOPMENT, STATE ALL STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, ETC. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) ANSWER QUESTION C IN THE ADA, ON THE BASIS OF PERSON TRIPS RATHER THAN VEHICLE TRIPS. The development of 1.5 million square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of commercial floor space would generate a significant number of trip productions and attractions. Table 31-7 identifies a number of trip generation assumptions based upon the two predominant land uses proposed in the Metro Project. Trips to and from the office floor space are categorized by employees and visitors. Likewise, the commercial floor space would attract trips of both employees and shoppers. The person trips per 1000 square feet of floor space were estimated by projecting the number of persons traveling per day to office and commercial buildings, assuming a standard absenteeism rate. The person trip ends per 1000 square feet were subsequently divided into internal and external person trips. Employee internal person trips would include miscellaneous shopping and eating trips which would be satisfied while the external trips to the site would be work 31-27 METR03:M 590-298.04 ? Mm MM ¦s r M M Mr r r"am mm Mm TABLE 31-7 PARK PLACE TRIPS GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS DAILY POP. DAILY PERSON EXTERNAL INTERNAL PERCENTAGE OCCUPANCY OF OF OF OF PER 1000 X TRIP ENDS PER TRIP ENDS PER TRIP ENDS PER USING (PERSONS PER INBOUND OUT INBOUND OUTBOUND SQ. FT. ABSENT 1000 SQ. FT. 1000 SQ. FT. 1000 SQ. FT. TRANSIT VEHICLE) TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS OFFICE Employees 5.0 7.0 16.0 13.8 2.5 5.0 1.2 33.0 6.0 5.0 25.0 Visitors 1.0 0.0 2.5 2.0 0.5 0.0 1,2 10.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 COMMERCIAL Employees 1.1 7.0 3.0 2.5 0.5 5.0 1.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Shoppers 35.0 0.0 70.0 57.0 13.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 6.5 7.0 METR03:0 related. Shoppers to the commercial floor space would be primarily external but would include other internal trips by visiting other business establishments within the project site. 1 Public transportation in the study area would capture a percentage of the person trips entering and exiting the site. It is estimated that five percent of all employee person trips would use transit, while one percent of the shoppers would patronize transit. Person trips not utilizing transit would travel by private automo- bile. It is estimated that 1.2 persons would be accommodated per vehicle entering or exiting the site for all work or business-related trips. Due to the different trip nature of shopping, approximately 1.5 persons would be anticipated per shopping vehicle. The percentages of daily trips entering and exiting the site during the morning and afternoon peak hours were also estimated in Table 31-7. These ratios were based upon actual counts taken from other office and retail developments. Person Trips Person trips generated by the Metro Development for each phase are shown in Table 31-8. The planned square footage built per phase was applied to the assumptions in Table 31-7 to arrive at these totals. Total person trips in this table are broken down into daily and peak hour, and categorized by those contributed by retail and office land uses. These figures include both internal and external person trips. METR03:M 31-29 590-298.04 r TABLE 31-8 PERSON-TRIP GENERATION BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE (Internal and External Person Trips) A. M. PEAK P.M. PEAK DAILY PERSON HOUR HOUR PHASE I TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 7,300 .110 60 235 250 435,000 Sq. Ft. Office 8,050 1,200 230 180 900 15,350 1,310 290 415 1,150 PHASE II 260,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 19,980 295 155 610 660 980,000 Sq. Ft. Office 18,130 2,715 520 405 2,020 38,110 1,010 675 1,015 2,680 PHASE III 460,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 33,580 520 275 1,080 1,165 1,500,000 Sq. Ft. Office 27,750 4,145 795 620 3,095 61,330 4,665 1,070 1,700 4,260 METR03:P 31-30 Vehicle Trips Vehicle trips generated by each development phase are shown in Table 31-9. Daily and peak hour volumes to and from the site were calcula- ted by multiplying the square footage for each development phase by the vehicle trip characteristics identified in Table 31-7. During the initial development phase, 9,210 daily trip ends would be gener- ated, with 22,090 and 36,210 daily trip ends generated at the ends of the second and third phases, respectively. A trip end is defined as a trip either beginning or ending at the site. For example, under Phase I 4,605 vehicles trips would be attracted to the site and 4,605 vehicles would leave the site per day. The morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes generated by the site are also calculated by multiplying the estimated trip rates by the square footage constructed during each phase. These volumes are shown by vehicles inbound and outbound for each phase in Table 31-9. The identified trip generation assumptions can be converted to vehicle trip ends per 1000 square feet for both office and commercial space. For office, a rate of 12.3 trip ends per 1000 square feet was calculated. This rate concurs with average trip ends generated by office developments as documented by the Institute of Transport- ation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook. The vehicle trip rate for commercial land use totaled 38.6 trip ends per 1000 square feet. ' This figure matched the Florida Department of Transportation's Trip Generation Research for average retail under similar conditions. rl L_j METR03:M 31-31 590-298.04 r TABLE 31-9 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION (Cumulative) A. M. PEAK P.M. PEAK DAILY VEHICLE HOUR HOUR PHASE I TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 3,860 60 30 120 130 435,000 Sq. Ft. Office 5,350 810 150 120 590 9,210 870 180 240 720 PHASE II 260,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 10,040 170 90 320 340 980,000 Sq. Ft. Office 12,050 1,820 340 260 1,330 22,090 1,990 430 580 1,670 PHASE III 460,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 17,760 300 160 580 600 1,500,000 Sq. Ft. Office 18,450 2,790 520 400 2,040 36,210 3,090 680 980 2,640 METR03:Q 31-32 Transit Trips Estimates of the number of people using public transportation were calculated using the trip generation assumptions in Table 31-7 and the project phasing schedule. Table 31-10 identifies the daily and ' peak hour person trips projected to use public transportation. During the initial phase of Park Place, approximately 180 people would ride the bus to the site, and 180 people would exit the site, ' totaling 360 trip ends. Approximately 840 and 1,330 daily transit trip ends would be anticipated in the second and third phases, respectively. Percentages of the daily trips occurring during the peak hour were used to determine the peak hour transit trips. These peak hour person trips are shown in Table 31-10. 0. ESTIMATE THE INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOP- MENT (I.E., PROVISION OF ON-SITE SHOPPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES, ON-SITE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, ETC.) WILL ACCOUNT FOR THIS INTER- NAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) ESTIMATE THE INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVEL- OPMENT (I. E., PROVISION OF ON-SITE SHOPPING AND RECREATION FACILI- TIES, ON-SITE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, ETC.) WILL ACCOUNT FOR THIS INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT. As indicated in the previous section, a number of internal trips are ' generated by Park Pace. The majority of the internal trips would consist of site employees eating or shopping in the commercial area of the development and shoppers visiting the site for one particular METR03:M 31-33 590-298.04 TABLE 31-10 TRANSIT TRIP GENERATION (PERSON TRIPS) PHASE I 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 435,000 Sq. Ft. Office PHASE II A. M. PEAK P. M. PEAK DAILY PERSON HOUR HOUR TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 70 0 0 5 5 290 45 10 5 35 360 T5- TO 10 40 260,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 180 0 0 5 5 980,000 Sq. Ft. Office 660 110 20 15 80 840 110 20 20 85 PHASE III 460,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 320 5 0 10 10 1,500,000 Sq. Ft. Office 11010 160 30 25 125 1,330 165 30 35 135 METR03:R 31-34 0 w METRO DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Vehicle Trip Distribution and Assignment The estimated trips generated under each development phase were dis- tributed based upon data used in the Florida Department of Transport- ation areawide transportation study. From the basic distribution calculations, vehicle trips were assigned to the surrounding street ' network using a "most reasonable" routing technique. Where two or more competing routes were identified, a diversion analysis was applied to determine the percentage of vehicles to travel each route. Exhibit 31-10 identifies the results of the traffic distribution and assignment analysis. As shown in the illustration, the traffic ' would enter and exit the site in all directions. Approximately 36 percent of the total traffic would travel to and from the north. Similarly, traffic to and from the west would total 23 percent while south and east directional splits would equal 18 and 23 percent, respectively. The most heavily used routes would be U.S. 19 and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. ' Vehicle Trip Attenuation - Vehicle trips entering the development would have trip origins throughout the traffic impact study area and beyond. Similarly, vehicles exiting the site would have trip 31-36 METR03:M 590-298.04 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i MAIN ST SB ALLEN AVE 5 ENTERPRISE RD 3 a VIRGINIA T. R 18% IO°/O _J ? x x a u 4% . / MAIN ST SUNSET POINT RD. see 2 W 30 4% m: J 20% _ .. ems. • "• 8% V PO r° v = 4% 8% 3 O /o O /e I 10 % •: 0 23/e GULF- T +•RAY:•:SLT[tk? »:•>:•::: <•>:t;•: ::;•»:• »»:•>:::•: :•::•:::iif:i::5:'5:; f:'<i>:' G LO TD - IW.'l:•:$Y>I}..::>:::•::>:: • •::•>'::::•.::. DRUID RD ::::: •:::: ? ' 33% , 17% : I% 4% . ARN BLVD. : I5% OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD 3% 3 1% BELLEAIR RD 2% NAINES c AYSNORE RD. W W -l W W Y W x U J 12 /O E. BAY OR . ROOSEVELT BLVD. Sam 19 68 0 1/4 1/2 I SCALE IN MILES SITE APPROACH DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT 31-10 I I r destinations within the influence area and points beyond. Typically, a large percentage of work and shop purpose trips have one trip-end, home-based. Due to residential and other land uses within the ' influence area, a percentage of work and shopping trips would be expected to have trip termini within the influence area. Table 31-12 identifies the estimates of trips attenuated within the ' influence area. As the table illustrates, within a 2-mile radius of the site, slightly over 4 percent of the shopping trips would be expected to terminate. This is explained by the number of residen- tial developments within the influence area which would produce trips to the site. Within a 2-mile radius, only about 1.5 percent of the work trips would be expected to terminate. This smaller percentage for the same distance (as compared to shop) exemplifies longer work trips being more acceptable to the driver than shop ' related trips. The vehicle attenuation factors listed in Table 31-12 were applied ' to the trips generated by Park Place. These factors were taken from regional data used in the Pinellas Area Transportation Study. Transportation Impacts Transportation impacts from the Metro Development and background ' traffic growth were identified for Phase I Development (1985), Phase II Development (1988) and Phase III Development (1991). The criteria 31-38 METR03:M 590-298.04 TABLE 31-12 VEHICLE TRIP LENGTH FREQUENCY PERCENT OF LENGTH OF LENGTH OF SITE GENERATED SHOP TRIPS OFFICE RELATED TRAFFIC ATTENUATED (MILES) (MILES) 1 1.14 1.10 2 1.35 2.25 3 1.65 2.60 4 1.95 3.10 5 2.25 3.40 10 2.70 4.50 15 2.08 5.40 20 3.53 6.40 25 3.75 6.90 30 4.20 7.50 35 4.35 8.30 SOURCE: Pinellas Area Transportation Study METR03:T 31-39 ' used in analyzing the traffic impacts include future year daily and peak hour traffic volumes and levels of service. The transit impacts are identified by the estimated person trips using each bus route. ' PHASE I DEVELOPMENT Traffic Conditions Future traffic conditions in the study area were estimated for com- pletion of the initial development phase of the Metro Project. Daily traffic volumes during this time period are shown in Exhibit 31-11. The projected daily traffic volumes are shown by the compon- ents of both the background traffic (assumed to increase by a 6.2 percent annual growth rate) and Phase I generated traffic. U. S. 19, both north and south of the site, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, both east and west of the site, McMullen-Booth Road and Drew Streets are expected to carry the largest percentage of project-related traffic. In comparing the background traffic projections in 1985 with existing traffic volumes, the 6.2 percent growth factor provides background traffic volume increases significantly larger than the site generated traffic. Peak hour traffic volumes were also projected for Phase I. Again, the existing Peak hours turn counts were increased by 6.2 percent annually to estimate the background traffic in future years. Phase I peak hour traffic vol umes were also inc luded in these traffic volumes. For simplicity in presenting this material, the Phase I peak hour turn counts were combined with the background traffic. Exhibit 31-12 identifies the afternoon peak hour turn movements` at 31-40 590-298.04 METR03:M 7 1 1 t' t t 1 I 580 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD. PHASE I PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-12 r t r w i i t w ROOSEVELT BLVD. PART B PHASE I PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-12 0 o m x o < o & m m x a' = m 19 GULF-TO-BAY BLVD. 10 m i i? completion of Phase I for all major intersections in the study area, and morning movements for three intersections adjacent to the site. Peak hour and daily equivalent levels-of service were calculated for the existing highway network. Exhibit 31-13 illustrates the level- of-service anticipated for each intersection and selected major links. As can be seen, four additional intersections would drop ` below level-of-service "D" during the peak hour. These intersections are located at U.S. 19 at Sunset Point, U.S. 19 at Coachman Road, U.S. 19 at Drew Street, and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. The intersections of U.S. 19 at S.R. 580, U.S. 19 at Country- side, U.S. 19 at Roosevelt, Belcher at Sunset Point, and Belcher at Gulf-to-Bay presently operate below acceptable conditions, and would continue to do so under Phase I, assuming no improvements. Transit Conditions Projected transit patronage under Phase I shows approximately 180 people would ride to and from the site throughout the day (See Table 31-10). With the existing CPTA transit ridership trends continuing, these daily trips s would not impact the existing levels-of-service on the four routes serving the area. During the peak hours, however, ridership could be affected. Assuming seated capacity presently occurs on Route 10 through the area during peak months (other months are much less) some standing passengers could be experienced. These conditions would be for only short periods, and would only occur on one route. Other routes would be able to absorb the ridership and remain within current levels-of-service, so that this publicly 31-44 METR03:M 590-298.04 M ?D MAIN ST. u yg 1 z ALLEN AVE. ENTERPRISE RD. i 3 a VIRGINI A ¢ a J J = J 9 _ 2 d m A ? MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. B = / W s 1990 a A •? J z ? J ? s 0P DREW Sr. ST. CLEVELAND ST. f A A OULF-TO-SAY BLVD. BAY BLVD. ,-,- 80 ??- a DRUID RD. B B /c A A 8 C C HA N BLVD. B C OLD TAMPA BAY P NURSERY RD. RD. D -UMERY BELLEAIR RD. A ?'•.... LEGEND r: D C " ? •• ' CSC ) INTERSECTION - AFTERNOON PEAK '' MAINE! ?/ HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ¢ AYlNORE R0. ? INTERSECTION MORNING/AFTERN0011 ¢ B PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE W DAILY LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE W AREA OF DEFICIENCY A Y R SEVELT BLVD. 19 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILE9 PHASE I LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-13 I I I subsidized operation would be more fully utilized and operating deficits would decline. PHASE II DEVELOPMENT Traffic Conditions Traffic volumes projected for 1988 would increase due to continued background growth as well as increases in Park Place traffic. Exhibit 31-14 presents the total daily traffic volumes broken down into background and site-related traffic. Peak hour turning volumes were calculated by the same procedure used in Phase I. Exhibit 31-15 identifies the peak hour turning movements at each major intersection under Phase I projections. The inter- section locations closest to the facility are most impacted by the development. Levels-of-service were calculated assuming existing highway condi- tions and Phase II traffic volumes (see Exhibit 31-16). As can be expected, the number of intersections and highway links operating below acceptable traffic parameters increase from existing and Phase I conditions. In 1988 when Phase II is completely developed, 20 out of the 37 intersections analyzed would fall below level-of-service "D" during the peak hour. 31-46 METR03:M 590-298.04 1 1 A f t y 1 1 r 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES PHASE II' AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-14 r t PHASE 11 0 S b 6 6i'i DREW ST. a 4W fm No- H O 2 a PART A PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-15 2 ¢ ¢ = m b b p ¢ = a 0 ° o g 9 ?!?' bpi D ¢ x O j 2 m m ? = s x M)LIF'TO'SAYBLVD. •+d 'q? ?? y d e l?l ?a DRUID RD. ,B HARN BLVD. OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD b ? 3 BELLEAIR RD. III HAINES SAYSNORE RD. 0 ROOSEVELT BLVD. I O 19 PART B PHASE II. PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-15 r N ALLEN AVE. MAIN ST. yB s ENTERPRISE RD. i 3 a VIRGINI A ST. R W (L J J R W V 19 S LL W co A p MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. ? C m •? c 4 x . : .. j roe g i r D DREW ST. ST. CLEVELAND ST. ..., mc GULF-TO-SAY BLVD.- ULf -TO - SAY BLVD. 60 DRUID R0 C/F . C D C > A : NA N eLw. C OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD. NURSE Y R .;;. GELLEAIR RD. A :: LEGEND ,.• INTERSECTION -AFTERNOON PFAK HOUR LEVEL OP SERVICE XAINE9 c AYSX011! RD. ? INTlIISECTION MORNING/AFTEIINOON PEAK HOUR LEVEL Of SERVICE C c x C C 1 DAILY LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE W LJ 7t B m /? ?::-;.•:>] AREA OF DEFICIENCY . ?: ^ AY DR. O ROOSEVELT BLVD. 18 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES PHASE II LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-16 i Transit Conditions Approximately 420 people would be expected to ride transit to and from the site on a typical weekday under Phase II. During the morning peak hour, 110 people would ride the bus to the site, while 85 would ride CPTA away from the site. Route number 10 would attract a large portion of these peak hour trips and would likely experience some standing load during average ridership months. Based upon the /_ trip distribution analysis, the other three routes would also capture a percentage of the transit trip, possibly producing some standing situations with the existing capacity. For this phase, either additional peak hour bus service would be required on these routes, or the potential transit ridership capture would not be realized. PHASE III DEVELOPMENT Traffic Conditions Traffic volumes in the final phase would continue to increase due to ?. background traffic growth and Park Place. By comparing the projected. daily background traffic volumes in Phase III (Exhibit 31-17) with the existing volumes (Exhibit 31-2), it is obvious that the 6.2% annual growth factor produces significant increases in background traffic. Peak-hour traffic volumes as shown in Exhibit 31-18 also indicate that significant increases in background traffic volumes continue to occur. Exhibit 31-19 indicates the levels-of-service during the peak hour and equivalent daily volumes on critical roadway links. Approxi- 31-51 METR03:M 590-298.04 I i 1 l MAI N ST 58 ALLEN AVE. 5 77:730 .8,110 86 3 2 0 8 4, 06 0 ENTERPRISE RD 45,9 0 6,260 3 6 46,220 6,260 S 22,370 VIRGINIA T. 4 580 0 26,950 2 2 w 19 S a 11,830 1 220 w m 13,0°0 29,840 0 0 29,840 ¢ MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RD. 5B8 100,100 = 9,840 T, 060 r 1.270 3+,570 46'380 50,920 107,180 0 11,110 0 0 0 m 34,570 W 4°,360 30,920 590 a 30,820 00 6,280 ?Q 0 30,920 ? ,2'O ? P W 19,100 "c 23 1* 2 ° y 900 2 K ' JO 116 900 60 , DREW ST ST CLEVELAND ST. 26,050 30,390 0 6,160 ?,? 4-M 34,210 30,390 GULF - TO -SAY BLVD. j GULF -TO - BAY BLVD. 60 DRUID ?? 38,860 u 66,220 1.060 69,360 73,950 °,260 47,210 57,200 5,790 6 360 94,7179,640 ARN BLVD. H 13'320 OLD TAMPA BAY 13,3°0 NURSERY RD NURSERY RD. eo,'lo 4 910 BELLEAIR RD. 96,520 '7 T8 18, 190 13 6 3T, 230 z+,+oo 18,870 LEGEND 890 \ HAINES 36,120 4;6x100 c BAYSHORE RD. BACKGROUND ADT +6,830 ¢ METRO DAILY TRAFFIC W W TOTAL ADT 78,790 31910 KIM 92,°90 E. BAY DR. ROOSEVELT BLVD. 80, 180 68;690 0 'o'leo 19 58,230 686 '9,370 2 070 T 1,440 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES PHASE II I AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-17 I PHASE III PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 4P/Ak /K% BELLEAIR RD. Oda A?b ROOSEVELT BLVD. ` PART B PHASE III PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-18 0 S o > o ? a m m N Q Q ? Z N J W ? J ? u `? 0 19 GULF-TO-BAY BLVD. _ > FTERNOON PEAK SERVICE MNINO/AFTENNOON L OF SERVICE iL OF SERVICE ICY 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES L PHASE III LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-19 FTERNOON PEAK SERVICE MNINO/AFTENNOON L OF SERVICE iL OF SERVICE ICY 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES L PHASE III LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-19 mately 80 percent of the intersections and highway links analyzed would be below level-of-service "D". The intersections and certain roadway links along U.S. 19, Gulf-to Bay Boulevard, Belcher Road, Drew Street and McMullen-Booth Road contain the primary deficiencies. Transit Conditions With complete buildout of the Metro Project, there would be a poten- W tial for approximately 660 people to use transit in traveling to or from the site each day. During the morning peak hour, approximately 165 people would be expected to ride to the site and 30 away from the site. During the afternoon peak hour, 35 people would be ex- pected to travel to the site while 135 would exit. To obtain these potential ridership levels, an increase in number of buses serving the site would be needed. This patronage could not be accommodated in the existing route structure with acceptable service levels. If service levels on transit would regularly require standees, the potential ridership capture rate would not be achieved. I Eisenhower Elementary Eisenhower Elementary School is currently located to the northeast of the intersection of Drew Street and Hampton Road. Approximately 800 students are enrolled at this school. Aproximately 75 percent of the enrollment walks to school while about 25 percent ride a bus. The school currently begins instruction at 9:15 AM and ends at 3:15 PM. Student walk trips are primarily from the north (via Fairview Avenue) and south (via Hampton Road). Hampton and Drew Streets have sidewalks and are used by the students. Students residing south of 31-56 METR03:M 590-298.04 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard use a pedestrian activated signal at the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Hampton Road on the trip to school. A second street crossing is required at Drew Street where the Hampton Road sidewalk ends. The increase in traffic generated by the site would create additional conflicts for the students walking to and from school. These would occur primarily at the Hampton Road at Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard inter- section crossing, and the crossing at Drew Street and Hampton Road. Impact Summary Both traffic and transit conditions surrounding the site would be expected to deteriorate in future years due to background traffic growth and to Park Place traffic. Table 31-13 presents a summary of traffic conditions which can be expected throughout each phase. Existing conditions are also shown in Table 31-13 for reference. Daily traffic on critical roadway links in the study area is shown in the upper one-half of the Table. Each daily traffic volume increases over the next 10 years. The bottom of Table 31-13 identi- fies the number of intersections operating in each service level for each time period. With continuous increases in traffic volumes, the number of intersections operating in levels-of-service "E" and "F" increases by time period. 31-57 METR03:M 590-298.04 /r i mwftm? m m MM M mm-mm mew TABLE 31-13 TRAFFIC IMPACT SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III U.S. 19 North of Drew 63,830 73,260 96,030 116,900 U.S. 19 South of Druid 52,010 61,560 77,920 94,710 Gulf-to-Bay west of Belcher 51,890 63,340 77,580 94,100 Gulf-to-Bay east of U.S. 19 42,990 53,600 65,230 79,640 McMullen-Booth north of Gulf-to-Bay 11,120 14,050 17,710 22,000 Drew west of U. S. 19 16,330 20,670 26,080 34,210 STUDY AREA INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE (Afternoon Peak Hour) Number Operating in Level A 18 6 3 1 Number Operating in Level B 6 7 1 2 Number Operating in Level C 6 10 7 1 Number Operating in Level D 2 5 6 1 Number Operating in Level E 2 3 6 9 Number Operating in Level F 3 6 14 23 TOTAL NUMBER ANALYZED 37 37 37 37 METR03:S F. BASED ON PROJECTED TRIPS AS SHOWN IN (E) ABOVE, WHAT MODIFICATIONS IN THE HIGHWAY NETWORK (INCLUDING INTERSECTIONS) WILL BE NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT? SPECIFY IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED INI- TIALLY AND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) ANSWER QUESTION 31.F ABOVE, ON THE BASIS OF THE ENTIRE TRANSPOR- TATION NETWORK (RATHER THAN JUST THE HIGHWAY NETWORK) INCLUDING I INTERSECTIONS AND ACCESS POINTS TO THE DRI. INCLUDE APPROPRIATE MASS TRANSIT CONSIDERATIONS. (2) WHO WILL PAY FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SPECIFIED IN QUESTION 31.F. Transportation improvements are necessary within the study area to accommodate future traffic volumes. Improvements were recommended when the traffic levels of service were projected to drop to below level-of-service "D" during the peak hour, or level-of-service "C" for average conditions throughout the day. PHASE I TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Conditions and requirements necessary in 1985, the year Phase I is completed, are listed below. Street Network Improvements Street improvements necessary in the initial development phase consist of extending Drew Street east of the site and upgrading a total of eleven intersections along U.S. 19, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. Exhibit 31-20 describes the location of each recommended highway improvement in Phase I. The intersections of U. S. 19 at S. R. 580, Countryside, Sunset Point, Coachman and 31-59 METR03:M 590-298.04 1 IL L MAIN ST. ALLEN AV E. S ENTERPRISE RD. CL VIRGINI A W i J J v W m _ S d 19 MAIN ST. SUNSET POINT RID. q 0? e ' r0 q ? F DREW Sr. DREW SST, 00000000001 CLEVELAND ST. GUI-1- TO-BAY BLVD. GU - BAY BLVD. 80 DRUID RD. HA N BLVD. , OLD TAMPA SAY NURSERY RD. NUBS RY RD. LEGEND BELLEAIR RD. ' Q AT-GRADE INTERBECTION GNMMVEYEMTB Q GRADE 8EMRATNIN f?fl OREW BTREET EXTENBNNI (t LANES) HAINES c a ? BAYSHOR NORF NO. W W W Y W = W j m AY DR. ROOSEVELT BLVD. 19 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES PHASE I RECOMMENDED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-20 ?I Roosevelt would operate at low service levels under the projected 1985 traffic volumes. Grade separations would be the most favorable means of maintaining proper service at these intersections. ?i At-grade intersection improvements are recommended at six additional intersections. The locations of these intersections are shown in Exhibit 31-20. These improvements primarily involve adding turn or through lanes at each intersection to increase the vehicle carrying capacity (see Exhibit 31-21). The completion of Drew Street between Hampton Road and Bayshore Boulevard is also recommended during this phase. A two-lane facility would be sufficient for all development phases. Projected turning movements at the Drew Street and McMullen-Booth Road intersection show a two-phase traffic signal would be required during this devel- opment phase. The north-south and east-west on-site roadways would also be devel- oped during this initial phase. The access points of the north-south street at Drew Street and the east-west street at Hampton Road were also investigated with regard to signal requirements. A two-phased traffic signal would be warranted at the intersection of.the north- south road with Drew Street. The intersection of the east-west street and Hampton Road would not require a traffic signal. 31-61 METR03:M 590-298.04 J ?t ?1(? 1i1 eaLCeaA eUM AT eYNaaY PoIMT eYAD 1—. 19 A. UAL- .1-1 ?111? ?- J11? J CULr-M-eAY W-AAU AT ULGNae PUAD ec .1 P(MO AT Ueaw 111- Jl? UULf?10?MY e(AIYYAp A} p1R11 /UPeAx1Ua GULr-A-eAY pYLaVAp A} MUMYlA.01 -T. IpAU N i 1 1 PHASE I AT-GRADE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-21 Eastbound left-turning vehicles would increase at the intersections of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at the north-south site road and at Hampton Road. Sufficient vehicle queuing space could be developed at each of these locations with the identified intersection improvements and proper signal phasing. Southbound left-turn traffic from U.S. 19 onto Drew Street would also increase with the proposed development. Again, adequate queuing space could be developed at this intersection during the initial development phase. Transit Improvements Transit ridership in the first development phase is not projected to significantly impact the daily or peak hour load capacities causing the need for additional buses or routes. However, with Route 10 currently carrying seated capacities during seasonal peak periods, loading factors should be monitored during this phase. Minor routing adjustment should be made to each of the four CPTA routes servicing the area. It is recommended that each of these routes pass through the development and designate two stops within the site. With the direction these routes travel in the area and E? the north-south and east-west streets to be developed, these routing changes and bus stops could be made with little modification to the existing schedules. Canopies and curb turning radii improvements will be coordinated with the CPTA. 31-63. METR03:M 590-298.04 i' Pedestrian Improvements Pedestrian Improvements should be made in the area to service the Eisenhower Elementary School. These improvements would primarily consist of a sidewalk on the northern side of the new Drew Street extension. This facility would serve Drew Street for a sufficient distance east and west of the school. The traffic signal proposed for the intersection of McMullen-Booth Road and Drew Street should be pedestrian actuated. This would allow students living east of McMullen-Booth Road to cross this street safely. Crosswalks should be marked and signed at this intersection, at the intersection of Drew at Hampton Road and the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. These improvements should occur during the initial phase of development and would be sufficient through buildout of the project. PHASE II TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Street Network Improvements Levels-of-service calculated for the intersections and street links show that more intersections and the roadway link of Sunset Point Road would become deficient during the second phase. Exhibit 31-22 identifies the location of the deficient facilities and the recom- mended treatments. The intersection of Drew Street at the north-south site road, Drew Street at Hampton Road, Drew Street at McMullen-Booth Road and the 31-64 METR03:M 590-298.04 . I MAIN ST .? ALLEN AVE S ENTERPRISE RD 3 a VIRGINIA ? ¢ a n J J ¢ U W m 19 _ 2 a P G ¢ ? MAIN ST. SBB x H m W 590 N 0 2 2 ? 0P GOP DREW ST. DREW ST CLEVELAND ST. GULF - TO•BAY BLVD. DRUID RD. ?- HARN BLVD OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD NURSERY RD. LEGEND BELLEAIR RD AT -GRADE INTERSECTION SpROVEMENTs Q GRADE SEPARATION ? DREW STREET EXTENSION (2 LANES) HAINES WIDEN FROM It TO 4 TRAFFIC LANES o 2 W W Y a W 2 U \ BAYSHORE RD. 686 E BAY DR. W m ROOSEVELT BLVD 9 686 0 1/4 1/2 1 SCALE IN MILES PHASE II RECOM MENDED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-22 ' east-west street at Hampton were all investigated relative to addi- tional improvements over Phase I requirements. During this phase no additional improvements were found necessary at each of these inter- sections. The availablility of left turn vehicle storage was also investigated relative to the morning peak hour ingress demands at ' Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at the north-south street intersection and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. Both of these locations would require additional storage capacity, but could be developed with the intersection improvements identified in Exhibit 31-23. Transit Improvements The recommended modifications to include transit routes through the ' project site should be continued during the second phase. It is anticipated that additional peak hour buses would pass through the site under the second phase. It is estimated that one additional bus in each direction on a north-south route, and one additional bus in each direction on an east-west route should be added during this phase to service the projected increase in riders from this develop- ment. I PHASE III TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Street Network Improvements The street network improvements under the final development phase include additional intersection upgradings and street widening. ' Exhibit 31-24 identifies these improvements. 31-66 METR03:M 590-298.04 1 t 11 t 1 _ M Sums!? SUM ROAD U.S. 11 AT [UN-SAT So.Aav\.o UUV-TU-.\Y SUU. AT fUU?S tIR.1/}1.C[ ?wl+ I -0m S.SO \T CUY.1Y. SUAU U.S. 19 AT SASS SIifOU S.Ao jj(? 11 ilk? ?_ AT USum q.tlT U.S. it.? SUSSSSS .US0 00W_", [aio.[v\.o AT .[.nm \U.SUS A SSWISS _ AT m. slSOT U.S. 19 AT Si1JiAIS .DM auvtio-.\r .oocsvA.o Al newou?I .mnl .p\o A .? 11(? SOm1 SUSU .T sOiisi. SO?U Stt®- Af .IISSOT - PHASE II AT-GRADE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-23 MAIN ST. ALLEN AVE. SB S ENTERPRISE RD i 3 a VIRGINIA O ? w a a J G w 19 u J m J Z a O MAIN ST. see W J N 4) ?Q W PD ?yr z P 0 GOB' DREW ST. CLEVELAND ST. GULF- TO-SAY BLVD. OIL ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ 60 DRUID RD. 00, NARN BLVD. OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD AZk NURSERY RD. LEGEND BELLEAIR RD Q AT-SRADE INTERSECTpN YPROVEMENTS Q GRADE SEPARATION ?A DREW STREET EXTENSION (2 LANES) NAINES WIDEN FRON 2TO4 TRAFFIC LANES o W 2 W W Y a Q W Z J W \ BAYSNORE RD. WIDEN FROM 4TO6TRAFFIC LANES E BAY OR. m ROOSEVELT BLVD. 9 68 0 1/4 I/2 I SCALE IN MILES PHASE III RECOMMENDED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-24 ' With the continued growth of the background traffic and the proposed development completely built, Drew Street, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, McMullen-Booth Road and Sunset Point Road should be widened. Loca- tions of the required intersection improvements are also shown in Exhibit 31-24. Exhibit 31-25 identifies the at-grade intersection improvements necessary to increase the level-of-service at each intersection to at least "D". Specific access requirements immediately surrounding and within the site were also identified. During this development phase, traffic signals would be required at the north-south street intersection with Drew Street and the intersection of Drew at McMullen-Booth as identified in earlier phases. The internal intersections of the east-west street and the north-south street should also have a t signal in Phase III. The intersections of Hampton Road at Drew and Hampton Road at the east-west intersection would not require signals with ultimate development. The left turning capacities and queuing space requirements were also identified for the ultimate development. The east bound left turning volumes at the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at the north- south site road would require a double left turn configuration, with length adequate to service the eastbound left turn ingress demand i.n both peak periods. The eastbound left turn demand from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard onto Hampton Road would also require a double left turn lane. A storage length of 150 feet at this location would be re- quired to adequately service the morning and afternoon peak hour demands. 31-69 METR03:M 590-298.04 r ? n n 0 1 ?111? BLLCNLP ROAD AT SUNSCT Po1NT nOAO Jlk efLCNBn ROAD AT COACNMAx ROAD ilk r BELCBER POAO AT Dnd fT11Y9' -? 1r eELCxEa PDAO AT oxum ROAo fel.CpfA ROAD AS xUAeEfT IMiAD 111 BfitYIY RDAo BELC1601 xPAO Al J OLD COACIDNR ROM AT aUM86S PoIN2 ROM OLD COACYAII ROAD AT COACYAN POAD Jl? ?- OIL COACxINx 110M AS DRY RRYT G"-'10-YT ROULNARO AT OLD WAVN11Ax ROAD 111 Gott-90-fA} fDOLNARO AT efxLTDlf ATYY J .a. 19 AT GULP-TO-BAY wuuE X11 us. v AT onuxo RDAD JUL 1Cllir ?l AT - SO.-WARD DUV-TO-BAY BOUL¢VARD A. n¢FT CLLAPnAT[P HALL DRIVE - 77 ?r GULF-TO-MY BOULEVARD AT so- LNTRANCE wLr?1o-BAY eOULNAaO AT RNIrtOX RUAO wLM110-eAT .-A. AT MCINLLEP BOVxX ROAD GULPNT ., eOUIdVARO AT &ATBRO.. ROULN ROIIUItOI ewTx RDAO AT COACwIM 1NU1D ORp1 RAYS BOICULxE AVORIE Al 111 ?- liar J.E. IT AT BAIIIY MTfROY ROM JP N PHASE III AT-GRADE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-25 Transit Improvements Additional CPTA service would be required in the vicinity of the site to service the projected ridership poten- tial. Approximately two additional peak hour buses in each direction of the east-west oriented routes would be required for the estimated Phase III transit riders. Likewise an additional two peak hour buses in each direction on north-south routes are recommended. Off-peak headways should be reduced on the existing routes in the area. This increase in service would be a stimulus to daily transit patronage. As in the earlier development phases transit routes should use the ' internal roads of the proposed site. Bus stops with possible bus shelters could be provided within the site at one or more locations to encourage transit use. Development Responsibility The transportation improvements outlined in this report for each development period are a result of traffic from both Park Place and background growth. The analysis indicates that highway facilities close to the site would either not become deficient, or not become deficient as soon without the proposed development. Other facilities located further away from the site have either zero or an insignificant amount of development traffic; and therefore are projected to become deficient at approximately the same times shown without the Park Place Development. 31-71 ' METR03:M 590-298.04 ?I The following facilities have a significant amount of development- related traffic and would either require the indicated improvement to be made, or would be subject to lowered levels-of-service at an earlier date than would occur without the Project. Appendix III provides data describing Project's contribution to intersections in the study area by phase. PHASE I ' ° Construction of Drew Street (2 lanes) between Hampton Street and McMullen-Booth Road. ' ° Install traffic signal at intersection of North-south site Road and Drew Street. ° Install pedestrian activated signal at McMullen-Booth Road at Drew Street Intersection. ° Improve Intersection of Drew Street at U.S. 19. ' ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at North-south Site Road. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. PHASE II ° Construction of Drew Street (2 lanes) between Hampton Street ' and McMullen-Booth Road. ° Install traffic signal at intersection of North-south site Road and Drew Street. ° Install pedestrian activated signal at McMullen-Booth Road at Drew Street intersection. ° Grade separate intersection of Drew Street at U. S. 19. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at North-south site Road. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at U.S. 19. 31-72 ' METR03:M 590-298.04 1 Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. PHASE III ° Construction of Drew Street (2 lanes) between Hampton Road and McMullen-Booth Road. ° Widen Drew Street (from 2 to 4 lanes between Coachman Road and site. ° Widen Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (from 4 to 6 lanes) between U.S. 19 and Bayshore Boulevard. °' Widen McMullen Booth Road (from 2 to 4 lanes) between Gulf-to- Ba Boulevard and S R 588 y . . . ° Install traffic signal at intersection of North-south site Road and Drew Street. ° Install pedestrian activated signal at McMullen-Booth Road at Drew Street intersection. ° Grade separate intersection of Drew Street at U.S. 19. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at North-south site Road. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at U.S. 19. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. ° Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. ° Improve intersection of Clearwater Mall Drive (west entrance) and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. Highway Improvement Scheduling The transportation improvements were identified which would be necessary under each development phase. The improvements identified were calculated to be the minimum necessary under each phase to improve the levels-of-service to the acceptable standards. This 0 31-73 METR03:M 590-298.04 method was used to allow maximum flexibility in improvement pro- gramming. Realistically, it is often more economic to fully improve a specific street or intersection during first phase if additional improvements will be necessary later on to accommodate the ultimate development traffic. Upgrading the capacity of the same segment of highway for each phase of development would be more costly and would create additional construction impacts. It is therefore recommended that wherever possible, a highway link or intersection be improved to satisfy the ultimate projected volumes at the first opportunity. One of the more important scheduled improvements involves the widen- ing of McMullen-Booth Road from 2 to 4 lanes. Desion for this project is nearly complete, including road and bridge construction plans and right-of-way mapping. The design includes provision for eventual addition of fifth and sixth lanes in the median, with right-of-way acquisition scheduled for 1982-83. Considering the ability of improvements to McMullen-Booth Road to relieve both background and project-related traffic on U.S. 19, it would be desirable for the applicant to coordinate with Pinellas County on intersection designs in the project vicinity in order that adequate ' capacity be provided when construction is completed. G. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE DEVELOP- MENT TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC -TRANSIT SYSTEMS? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING, PARKING PROVISIONS, LOCA- TION, ETC. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE FOR THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE BY MEANS OTHER THAN PRIVATE AUTOMOBILE? Q, TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ' 31-74 METR03:M 590-298.04 (1) WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE DEVELOP- MENT TO EXPAND EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS? ALSO, WHAT FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND/OR CONSTRAINTS WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE TO FOSTER UTILIZATION OF MASS TRANSIT? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING, PARKING PROVISIONS, LOCATION, ETC. Public transportation, parking strategies, pedestrian amenities and other Transportation System Management Techniques could be success- , fully employed to transport people to and from the site by means other than the private automobile. The following paragraphs iden- tify potential options under each. Public Transportation As outlined in section "F" transit routes and schedules should be improved to service the Metro site. Routing of each line which presently passes the site today could easily be modified to include direct service within the site. It would be recommended by the final phase that two additional peak hour buses operating in both directions on east-west oriented routes, and two additional peak hour buses in each direction on north-south routes be added. During the off-peak periods, service should be improved (by completion of the final phase) on each of these routes to operate with headways of 30 minutes or less. New route possibilities should be explored to better service the market area of this development. Potential bus service from Clearwater to Tampa should be explored during this development period. 31-75 METR03:M 590-298.04 11 E d 2 3 x M LEGEND SIGNAL LOCATION LANE INDICATION -? BUS STOP PHASE III SITE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-26 A i DREW STREET -p- ! i i i i o ? w U U Q GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD _, lift Iil Two bus stops are proposed within the site. These two, as shown in ?I Exhibit 31-26 would be located on either side of the north-south site road. Minor bus stop amenities, such as benches, adequate lighting, and bus schedules and shelters could be provided at each location. Cross walk pavement markings should be applied at each stop to alert motorists of bus patrons crossing at these locations. Pedestrian Amenities Landscaped and lighted sidewalks or paths should be provided on site to encourage pedestrian activities. With these convenient pedestrian links between activity centers, the walk mode interval trips would be more convenient than comparable auto trips. This aspect of the site plan would produce a safer and more efficient site environment. ` Parking Adequacy The proposed Metro Development plans for 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square I feet of commercial and 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office for 39 each development phase. These ratios have proved satisfactory for other similar developments. Therefore, no parking "spillover" out- side of the site would occur. Transportation System Management (TSM) Techniques In addition to physical transportation improvements, the transporta- tion impacts of the Metro Development could be mitigated during each phase by measures designed to "manage" or to reduce the traffic gen- erated by the developments. The following TSM measures would lessen 31-76 METR03:M 590-298.04 i the transportation impact of the Metro Development. The more success- ful TSM measures implemented in other such developments have shown reductions in the trips generated by 10 to 15 percent. These techni- ques should be applied in each phase of development where possible. ° Staggered Work Hours - By shifting beginning and ending times for major employers in the development, the peaking characteris- tics tend to be spread over a longer period of time, causing less overall congestion and capacity constraints. For example, this program would operate with one larger office tenant begin- ning work at 7:45 AM, a second beginning at 8:00 AM, and a third and a fourth at 8:15 AM and 8:30 AM respectively. The afternoon peak hour would likewise have staggered ending times. AF ° Car Pool/Van Pool Programs - Organized car pooling and van pooling programs have proved successful where large employment concentrations exist. To make this program effectively lower trip generation rates, a concentrated effort is necessary to match home locations and work hours of interested employees. Preferential parking locations could be given to high occupancy vehicles to promote the program. Van pooling programs have proved to be successful with both employee owned vans as well as privately owned vans. 31-78 METR03:M 590-298.04 ° Park-n-Ride Facilities - With the projected growth in U.S. 19 traffic, the opportunities for opening park-n-ride lots along this corridor exist. This would allow employees to park in an outlying facility and ride the bus to the site. This program would not only help reduce trips to the site but would also aid in reducing traffic growth along U.S. 19. ° On-Site Eating/Service Facilities - Commercial land uses pro- posed on the site would in effect lower the average trip gener- ation rates for typical office buildings. Shops, eating facili- ties and other service-related square footage would satisfy a number of the mid-day trips to and from the site. ° Parking Rates - A minimal charge for long-term (employee and non-shoppers) parking could effectively increase trends to use local transit and park-n-ride lots. This possibility could negatively effect the. employee desirability of the site, and therefore, should be used with proper consideration. 31-79 METR03:M 590-298.04 UESTION 39. OFFICE PARKS The development concept for Park Place includes 1.5 million square feet of offices as a major component of total land use in the project. This is a concept proposal at present, based primarily on the general use potentials ,r indicated by the site's location and the overall development potentials in the Tampa Bay Region. Only preliminary consideration has been given to the manner of disposition of this property or to prospective office space tenancy. The proposed office space, if operated or managed as a single development entity, would exceed the threshold for an Office Park Development of Regional Impact under Chapter 22-F, Florida Administrative Code. Responses in this section describe impacts based on a general concept that addresses broad market potentials rather than development approaches based on committed tenancy. A. WILL THE FIRMS ENGAGED IN BUSINESS IN THE PROPOSED OFFICE PARK BE NEW TO THE REGION, NEW BRANCHES OF EXISTING OPERATIONS, OR RELOCA- TIONS OF EXISTING OPERATIONS IN THE REGION? Park Place has the potential to attract each of these types of tenants for the following reasons: ° New Regional Businesses -- the planned high quality environment and high visibility location afford a prestigious setting for companies that seek a Sunbelt location for facilities that will impart a strong corporate image. Good accessibility to Tampa International Airport and centrality to many high-amenity 39-1 METR02:X 590-298.06 residential areas for employee housing are other attributes that can play a strong role in attracting relocations to this site. ° New Branches of Existing Operations -- Major business and population growth is now occurring on both sides of Tampa Bay, particularly in middle and upper Pinellas and in north and northwest Hillsborough Counties. Many businesses who are firmly established in traditional downtown centers of Tampa and St. Petersburg may expand into branch facilities nearer to these new growing markets. Park Place offers ready access to these areas while also maintaining good access to the central office location. ° Relocation of Existing Regional Operations -- Some types of businesses are seeing their market growth occur in areas that are distant from their present location. After weighing the advantages of their present location against the advantage of locating nearer the growth markets, businesses may opt for the latter and choose a site like Park Place that affords prestige, accessibility and visibility. B. WHAT TYPE OF OPERATION WILL OCCUPY THE OFFICE PARK: I.E., CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS, DIRECT CUSTOMER SERVICE, ETC.? With 1.5 million square feet of office space planned, Park Place can accommodate space needs of virtually any office tenant. The project scale, together with the location advantages and site amenities the development will provide, should make it possible to attract at 39-2 METR02:X 590-298.06 least one major tenant interested in establishing regional or national headquarters in the Tampa Bay Region. Firms that provide direct service to businesses in Hillsborough and Pinellas will be attracted by this site's location which offers good access to both markets. Firms serving residential needs at the community level would benefit less from the location advantages of Park Place, but could be attracted by the high amenity setting to be provided here. C. WHAT IS THE SERVICE AREA OF MAJOR OCCUPANTS OF THE OFFICE PARK? D The majority of office space at Park Place is expected to be occupied by firms who are oriented to broad regional or extra- regional service areas and who would thus gain greater benefit from the strategic site location with access to the regional airport and to markets in Pinellas and Hillsborough counties. A smaller share will be businesses oriented to a community-level service area. IF AVAILABLE, WHAT WILL BE THE COST RANGE PER UNIT OR SQUARE FOOT FOR TENANTS TO OCCUPY THE SITE? New general tenant office developments in competitive locations are showing base rents for leasable space in the $14-$16 range. Base rates at Park Place have not been established, but early investiga- tions indicate project feasibility at competitive rates. Discount rates may be used as a strategy to attract prime tenants, and there 39-3 METR02:X 590-298.06 is the possibility that build/sell agreements may be reached with some major corporate occupants. IMPACTS ON ESTABLISHED OFFICE EMPLOYMENT CENTERS The Regional Comprehensive Plan Guide identifies the site vicinity (Clearwater Mall area) as a Sub-County Center, planned to serve local communities within a county. Regional centers nearest the area are: Clearwater CBD; St. Petersburg- Clearwater Airport Area; and the Tampa International Airport Area (Westshore). Countryside, another Sub-County Center, lies to the north. Park Place will more closely fit the regional or sub-regional profile than the sub-county profile if the types of development potentials described here are realized. This section describes the potential relationships or impacts that the apparent shift of activity could have on the other centers and on regional patterns. In addition, the City of Safety Harbor has also requested that potential implica- tions of this project for the Safety Harbor CBD be considered. Competition for Regional Office Tenants Park Place enjoys two locational advantages that are also shared by the two regional centers near airports, i.e., good access to commer- cial air facilities and to growth centers on both sides of Tampa Bay. These can be important locational factors for firms that serve 39-4 METR02:X 590-298.06 regional or extra-regional markets, and thus seem to warrant classi- fying the Clearwater Mall area as a regional center that can compete for and effectively accommodate the needs of these types of businesses. By comparison, the Clearwater CBD does not enjoy these locational advantages to the same degree, although it can offer the prestige of a downtown setting. Other factors which may affect the ability of Park Place to compete with other regional centers, and which therefore should be considered in evaluating the appropriateness of regional scale development here include the following: ° Park Place is more centrally located to the major development and growth centers of Pinellas County than the St. Pete- Clearwater Airport regional center. By providing a closer destination to the growing mid-Pinellas and north Pinellas areas and Pasco County than is afforded at the airport location, this site can reduce trip demands on some heavily traveled north-south regional route sections -- a regional benefit. ° The Westshore area in Hillsborough County will continue to have the best access to the region's primary commercial aviation facility. This area is approaching a build-out state, however, and development is beginning to spill over to areas east and west of Tampa International Airport. With few suitable sites in these locations in Hillsborough, much of the spillover will have to shift to the next alternative -- across-the bay -- if growth of businesses that require good airport access is to continue. 39-5 METR02:X 590-298.06 ° The alternatives for linking Hillsborough and Pinellas are limited: Gandy Bridge, Howard Frankland Bridge, Courtney Campbell Causeway, or around the bay to the north. From a regional transportation viewpoint, it would seem appropriate to locate regional centers so as to distribute traffic among these limited alternatives. The Courtney Campbell Causeway is less vulnerable to traffic stoppages caused by accidents or disabled vehicles than the two bridge routes because traffic or disabled vehicles can be diverted to the shoulders. Improvements to increase route capacity can also be accomplished at less expense I here than on the bridges. Competition for Tenants Serving Sub-County Areas The Park Place location is less suited to serving a subcounty market because it is not central to a localized residential/business growth sector (Tampa Bay truncates the eastern quadrant of a geographic service area). Community-serving businesses are thus expected to be of lesser importance to its success although some may be attracted by the planned high quality office environment. Clearwater CBD and Countryside office centers will be the primary competitors, the CBD being the traditional community core and Countryside being closer to areas of major recent growth. The Safety Harbor CBD is strongly oriented to businesses that provide services in its immediate area. Its central location to the local service area should continue to I attract those tenants, with minimal impact from Park Place. 14 39-6 METR02:X 590-298.06 r In summary, the most significant market penetration by Park Place will be in attracting businesses with regional or extra-regional service areas or functions, and it is possible that Park Place may actually expand the potential to attract these businesses to the region through its own marketing efforts. Further, the specialty retail concept will tend to function as a positive economic multi- plier in expanding trade for Park Place as well as for surrounding retail and business centers. Overall, the strength of its ability to compete will depend on its ability to better satisfy the needs of these firms than is possible at the location alternatives in an open market. 11 39-7 METR02:X 590-298.06 ?r QUESTION 43. SHOPPING CENTERS The development concept for Park Place includes 460,000 square feet of retail space as a major component of total project land use. The planned concept is for development of a specialty retail area in a high-quality setting. Although several alternatives are being considered as to the character this complex will assume, it is not planned as a typical shopping mall such as Clearwater Mall or Countryside Mall. Responses in this section describe impacts based on a concept of development of many small specialty shops, although the type and extent of tenant mix is at present subject to only preliminary consideration. A. INDICATE WHETHER THE TENANTS OF THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE NEW TO THE REGION, ESTABLISHING A NEW BRANCH IN THE REGION, OR RELOCATING WITHIN THE REGION. SPECIFY BY TYPE OF TRADE. The development concept has not been fully set, and only preliminary investigations have begun on prospective tenancy. Franchised or chain specialty retail stores already in the nearby malls, however, are not expected to be drawn here since this complex will break the typical mall pattern by not providing major anchor department stores. Rather, it is expected that the unique character planned at Park Place will attract more new entries to the region from other areas or through newly established proprietor-owned shops. 43-1 METR02:Y 590-298.06 B. DESCRIBE THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TRADE AREAS WHICH THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER WILL SERVE. ESTIMATE ANNUAL SALES TO CUSTOMERS BY COUNTY OF THEIR RESIDENCE. Primary trade areas will be mid-Pinellas County and western Hills- borough County. To succeed, however, a specialty center of this nature must also penetrate the total regional market for specialty items. This will require development of a truly unique complex that can potentially draw shoppers from greater distances. A rough estimate of sales distribution by county of residence is as follows: Pinellas -- 65 percent Hillsborough -- 20 percent Pasco -- 10 percent Other -- 5 percent. C. IF AVAILABLE, WHAT WILL BE THE COST RANGE PER UNIT OR SQUARE FOOT FOR TENANTS TO OCCUPY THE SITE? Lease rates have not been set but should be comparable to rates in other major retail centers in the area. IMPACTS ON ESTABLISHED RETAIL CENTERS The Regional Comprehensive Plan Guide identifies the site vicinity (Clearwater Mall area) as a Sub-County Center, planned to serve local communities within a county. Regional centers nearest the area are: Clearwater CBD; St. Petersburg-Clearwater Airport Area; 43-2 METR02:Y 590-298.06 and the Tampa International Airport Area (Westshore). Countryside, .. another Sub-County Center, lies to the north. The specialty retail development planned for Park Place will be geared more to a broad regional market than to a community scale service area, and it thus will more closely fit the regional or A sub-regional profile than the sub-county profile. This section describes the potential implications this change could hold for other activity centers which might have a regionally significant impact. The City of Safety Harbor has also requested that potential implications of this project for the Safety Harbor CBD also be considered. Regional Market Penetration General retail demand in mid-Pinellas County is generally well met by existing retail facilities, particularly the Countryside and Clearwater regional shopping malls. Other concentrations in downtown Clearwater, and smaller shopping centers along major streets augment these major facilities. Recognizing this and the fact that the focus of new market area growth is farther north, planners for Park Place are looking instead toward a retail concept that will be unique enough to attract shoppers from a large area for specialty shopping trips, as well as complementing existing nearby retail opportunities. It will thus penetrate specialty retail demand for several major centers, dispersing the impact, rather than trying to 43-3 METR02:Y 590-298.06 serve an area that is congruent with the market area of existing major centers. Most tenants at Park Place are not expected to be the same as those chain or franchise outlets found in the area's regional malls. Shops here will be targeted to a different demographic profile of shoppers, which in some cases will not meet requirements of those outlets. The Park Place shops will compete with these establishments for the specialty retail dollar, but in view of the specialty retail sector's relatively small share of overall retail expenditures, the impact on overall growth and sales potential of other retail activity centers of the region should not be regionally significant. Local Market Penetration Although Park Place will address a regional market, the surrounding communities in mid-Pinellas County will stand as the primary market area. Specialty shops in Clearwater Mall, Countryside Mall, Clearwater CBD and the Safety Harbor CBD will be affected by the new competition. Specialty shops, however, do not rely on maintaining a business monopoly for survival; they instead depend on the exposure they gain from location near a major draw such as a department store, government center, large employment center, etc. To the i extent that the existing centers maintain these primary draws, they should be able to continue to attract and hold a share of specialty I business activity. 43-4 METR02:Y 590-298.06 . In summary, the potential for Park Place to impact other retail centers of the region will depend on its ability to penetrate their markets by offering better accessibility, better produce choice, or a better shopping environment than the competition. If this could not be accomplished, the project would not be feasible and there would be no impact. Encouraging new competition which can offer a higher standard of service to the public would appear to be consis- tent with regional objectives of working toward a better urban r environment. 43-5 METR02:Y 590-298.06 APPENDIX I LETTER TO CITY OF CLEARWATER r P B Post, Buck:Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. IM-N S i CONSULTING ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 2451 ENTERPRISE ROAD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33515-2012 • 813/796-7275 • TELEX 808435 June 9, 1982 Mr. Anthony L. Shoemaker, City Manager City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater,. Florida 33518 RE: Metro Development Corporation's Clearwater Site Dear Tony: During our meeting on June 4th with Larry Wolfe of the Metro Development Corporation, Tim Johnson and Dave Healey, it was agreed that the City would provide us with letters regarding the availability of certain services related to the Metro Development Corporation parcel. The letters we need should address each of the following: Wastewater Water Supply Flood Insurance Solid Waste Police Protection Fire Protection Emergency Medical Services I have included below a more detailed explanation of the type of infor- mation that must be addressed in each of your letters. Also attached are several copies of the Project Narrative prepared for TBRPC as part of the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) review process, which can be used as additional background information on the project. As I mentioned during our meeting, a portion of the DRI application involves answering questions about how the project will be provided with necessary utilities and other public services. Preliminary discussions with staff persons from TBRPC indicate that we can satisfy the intent of the DRI application, with the added advantage of interacting directly with the persons involved in key decision making roles on the local level, by using a correspondence format rather than the independent question and answer format of the application. In order to efficiently exercise this option, all of the DRI topics or services affected are summarized in the following paragraphs. In some cases, we have pro- jected future service demands, using the phasing plan found in the Mr. Anthony L. Shoemak_, June 9, 1982 Page Two project narrative and per-square-foot demand conversion factors. Particular concerns which have been raised by TBRPC, or which otherwise seem appropriate to address, also appear under each topic. Please r advise us as to any local concerns which might be omitted. We understand that unconditional commitments to service the entire project may not be possible in all cases at this time. Where not possible, perhaps commitments could be made by project phase. Wae+cwatcr Wastewater flow from the project would be solely of human origin, with the possible except of 'a.minor amount of restaurant waste. According to the phasing schedule for the project, average daily project service requirements would be as follows: PHASE RETAIL (MGD) OFFICE (MGD) TOTAL (MGD) m I .015 .033 .048 II .024 .041 .065 III .030 .039 .069 TOTAL .069 .113 .182 NOTE: Wastewater generation rates and potable water use rates are assumed to be identical, and are based on 0.15 gpd per sq.ft. for retail space, and 0.075 gpd per sq.ft. for office space. We would appreciate a letter of commitment to provide wastewater collection and treatment service to the project. Also, please clarify the relationship of the present administrative moratorium to this service request. Any additional information on the City's preferred method of service, or on service problems if any, would be most appreciated. Water Supply Present plans call for landscaping irrigation requirements to be met through shallow wells on site. The following projections of average daily water demand are based on the phasing schedule in the project narrative, and on conversion factors shown below: PHASE RETAIL (MGD) OFFICE (MGD) TOTAL (MGD) I .015 .033 .048 II .024 .041 .065 III .030 .039 .069 TOTAL .069 .113 .182 NOTE; Wastewater generation rates and potable water use rates are r Mr. Anthony L. Shoemak,-, June 9, 1982 Page Three assumed to be identical, and are based on 0.15 god per sq.ft. for retail space, and 0.075 god per sq.ft. for office space. We would appreciate a letter of commitment to serve the project with domestic water supplies. Also, please indicate whether project demands are large enough to affect future City-wide water supply alter- natives. Any additional information on the City's.preferred method of service, or problems related thereto, if any, would be appreciated. Flood Insurance According to our preliminary information, the project site is entirely within FIRM Zone C, which is above the 500 year flood level: The final internal drainage system design and grading plan will be used to set building floor elevations above the 100 year design flood level. Please advise us as to whether the above is correct and acceptable to the City, and whether the City of Clearwater qualifies for federal flood insurance. Solid Waste It is our understanding that solid waste pick up would be provided by the City, and disposal would be provided by Pinellas County through the resource recovery plant now under construction. We expect the waste stream from this project to be composed almost entirely of paper and paper products, with small amounts of restaurant waste and miscellaneous trash. The waste stream is projected as follows: Solid Waste (cubic yards per week)* PHASE RETAIL OFFICE TOTAL I 75 52 126 II 118 65 183 III 148 62 210 TOTAL 340 179 519 *Projections are based on information provided by Mr. James McGee of the City of Clearwater Sanitation Department. Police The pre-application narrative shows the Master Concept Plan in- cluding access points to surrounding arterials. The internal roadways are proposed for dedication to the City. An, internal security force is not presently planned. Please advise us as to the Department's ability to provide police service to the project, and of any related or otherwise pertinent ?I Mr. Anthony'L. Shoemat._,• June 9, 1982 Page Four information which would help improve the project from a police pro- tection perspective. i Fire Particular features of the project which may be important to fire protection include plans for mid-rise buildings up to 10 stories in height. Water pressure for hydrants appears adequate to serve the project. Please advise us of the Department's ability to provide fire pro- tection, and of any other pertinent information which would help us improve the project from afire protection point of view. Response times and locations of responding stations would be helpful in this regard. j Emergency Medical Services Please advise us of the City's ability to provide Emergency Medical Services to the project. Surrounding station locations and response times would be helpful in our planning. Any other pertinent information that would 'be helpful will be appreciated. Tony, I appreciate the assistance both you and Dave have provided concerning this project, and your commitment to supply these letters that will help speed up the DRI review process. If you, or anyone on your staff, has a question concerning the attached information or would like additional clarification please have them contact me as soon as possible. We would like to receive a draft copy of each of these letters during the week of June 14th in order to give us enough time to have them finalized during the week of June 21st and included in the DRI document that will be submitted shortly thereafter. Thank you again for your assistance. Very truly yours, POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager i EM:cc Enclosures cc - Larry Wolfe Tim Johnson 1 590-298.03 i I APPENDIX II I TBRPC PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 1 Agenda Item #2 June 28, 1982 DRI PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DRI #92 METRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PINELLAS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER JUNE 28, 1982 Metro Development Corporation is seeking DRI approval for a multi-purpose retail/office park in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of US 19 and Gulf to Bay Boulevard (SR 60) (directly across from the Clearwater Mall) in central Pinellas County. The proposed Metro Development Corpora- tion project is planned to provide 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail space and will consist of a mix of four to 10 story office buildings in a garden setting, utilizing earth berms for noise reduction. A three phase, nine-year development build-out is planned. Metro Development Corporation has submitted the attached summary narrative explaining their proposal. Based on review of the project summary narrative submitted by the appli- cant, adopted Local Goverment Comprehensive Plans, regional plans, studies and reports, other Developments of Regional Impact (DRIB) in the area, the Council's adopted Regional Issues List and the Council's adopted growth policy, The Future of the Region , the following regional issues are identi- fied with this proposed project: 1. Transportation - The regional review will require identification of the impact of the proposed project on regional roadways, the roadway improvements which will be necessary on those roadways to maintain a level of service consistent with adopted Council policy and funding commitments to implement identified roadway improvements. The regional review will also require that mass transit design capacity and transportation management techniques such as a park and ride facilities be assessed. Additionally, the regional review will consider transportation-related hazards to children walking to and from Eisenhower Elementary School. A. The transportation study area will be bounded by: SR 580 on the north SR 686 on the south Hercules Avenue on the west Bayshore Boulevard on the east B. The Application for Development Approval (ADA) shall assess the impact of the proposed development on the intersections within the impact area and major roadway-links connecting these intersections at a minimum, and shall address needed improvements to all links tamps bay regional planning council 9455 Koger Boulevard. St. Petersburg, FL 33702 • (813) 577-5151 /Tampa 224-9380 and intersections to which this development will contrib to five percent or more of the daily Level of Service "C" traffic Level of Service "D" during peak hours). C. The transportation methodology referenced in the DRI narrative summary shall be adhered to in the ADA. Justification will need to be provided for any departure from the referenced methodology. 2. Public Facilities - The regional review will require assurances from providers that sufficient capacity to provide public facilities to the proposed development will be available. 3. Environment - the extent to which this project will impact water quality and air quality will be of concern during the regional review. 4. Economics - the regional review will require clarification as to the ability of the region to support the construction of 1,500,000 square feet of office space and 460,000 square feet of retail space at this location. The regional review will also require assessment of the potential for adverse economic impacts on other area activity centers: Countryside Downtown Clearwater St. Petersburg/Clearwater Airport Area 5. Energy and Water Conservation - The regional review will require clari- fication of energy and water conservation measures that will be incorporated in the proposed project. It has been agreed that the following questions may be eliminated from the ADA: Question 4626 - Education Question 4632 - Housing It has been further agreed that the following changes will be made in the ' ADA format: Question 19: Historical and Archaeological Resources - Substitute a pro- posed Development Order. condition to the effect that a professional archaeological survey will be completed before construction begins; and stipulating that any historical or archaeological resources discovered will be reported to the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management. Further stipulate that the ultimate disposition of such re- sources would then be determined in cooperation with the Division of Archives and the local government with jurisdiction. A copy of the legal description and the ADA response to Question 19 shall be sent to Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management. Question 21: Wastewater - Present two letters in lieu of the ADA ques- tions. The first would be from the applicant providing the City of Clearwater with project phasing, projected demands for service, and inquiry as to the City's ability to provide service. The second would be the City's letter of commitment to provide service, acknowledging phased demands of the project. Question 22: Drainage - Present the Master Drainage Plan and stipulate to satisfy the City's and DER's requirements for stormwater quantity and ?- quality control. Also stipulate that the completed application to DER for Storm water Discharge Permit would be copied to TBRPC and the City of Clearwater and that the Master Drainage Plan shall be a condition of the Development Order and shall address the Council's adopted water quality policies as contained in the Future of the Region and assign maintenance responsibilities. Question 23: Water Supply and Question 24: Solid Waste - Answer in the same format as for question 21 above. Question 28: Health Care - Substitute two letters addressing EMS response times, staffing, and ability to service the project. Question 29: Police and Question 30: Fire - Answer with a letter from the City of Clearwater concerning ability to provide safety protection to the project. The ADA shall address specific fire protection devices to be incorporated into the design of the buildings. The ADA shall respond to the attached questions provided by Southwest Florida Water Management District. The Council's regional review shall focus on, but not be limited to, the above referenced regional issues. The regional review shall also consider comments received from other agencies, issues resulting from project site inspection and pertinent information from other sources which may be brought to the Council's attention during the regional review. The Clearinghouse Review Com mitee has on this date adopted this report which shall become the basis of subsequent project review pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes and instructs that the applicant also respond to any attached comments from reviewing agencies. Committee adopted Mayor George McGough, Chairman Clearinghouse Review Committee t APPENDIX III TECHNICAL APPENDIX TO TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS 1 I I 1 TECHNICAL APPENDIX PART III - Procedure in Determing Daily Link Capacities In January of 1979 the Florida Department of Transportation, Urban Transportation Planning Section issued a technical memo dealing with UTP daily service volumes. The memo read as follows: 19 "A strong desire exists to equate Daily Service Volumes (capacities) to a given level-of-service. Based on UTP Procedure No. 1, which was last revised January 179 1978, the resultant subject values herein are developed by area type, facility type, and number of lanes in both directions. Daily Service Volumes have been determined for Level-of-Service "C", "D", and "E"." Procedure No. T1 or 1, , as referred to above, was developed to achieve simplified, quick and manageable traffic assignment procedures for Florida's urbanized areas. To do this, tables were developed showing hourly intersection capacities in vehicles per hour per lane. These tables were then used as input to the UROAD model so that link capacities could be established resulting in traffic assignments to an urban network. These capacities were developed using prcedures outlined in Highway Research Board, Special Report 87, "Highway Capacity ' Manual 1965" Chapter Six. In order to us the HCM for this purpose some general assumptions pertaining to grades, metropolitan population, percent trucks, percent left and right turns, ect. had to be made. These assumptions are listed below: 1.. All capacities are per lane, one direction, hourly capacities 2. Capacities are Level of Service "E", possible capacities, therefore Load Factor = 1 vi 3. Lane width, lateral restrictions, alinment., and grades will have negligible effect on capacities of freeways and expressways 4. Percent trucks = 5%, adjustment factor W 0.95 for freeways, W = adjustment factor for lane width and lateral clearance. (HCM Table 9.2) 5. Area type will not effect freeway capacities 6. Grades in Florida have negligable effect on capacities 7. Population approxamately 500,000 8. Peak hour factor - .85 9. For system level planning in urban areas, critical arterial capacities will occur at signalized intersections, therefore, except for freways, intersection capacities will be used. 10_ 50% of the Four Lane arterial and collector facilit::s have parking on both sides and 50% have no parking, 11. 25% of the Six Lane arterials and collectors have parking on-both sides and 75% have no parking, 12. Parking lanes are 8 feet wide 13. Greentime over cycle lenth, G/C varies from 0.4 for collectors to 0.6 for divided arterials When it was learned that there was a desire to develop generalized daily service volumes by Level-of-Service, the hourly capacities were expanded to daily volumes. The assumption was made that peak hour traffic is equal to 10% of the daily traffic (k = 10%). Tables showing UTPS Daily Service Volumes for Levels- of-Service "C", "D" and "E" were developed. To perform the analysis required to satisfy Question 31 of this DRI for Metro Development Corporation a large amount of field data was collected. These field data included lane configurations per approach, movement volumes per approach and vii signal timing and phasing all of which were collected for a total of 38 intersections in the study area. This field information as well as data collected from FDOT, Pinellas County and the City of ' Clearwater allows parameters that were assumed in procedure No. T1 to be defined on a site specific bases. The levels of service found on roadway sections in Figures through - of the ADA were determined by applying the same methodology used by FDOT to determine the UTPS daily service volumes for various levels-of-service. The difference is that site specific data were used in the ADA analysis rather than the generalized assumptions used by FDOT in 1978 and 1979. viii i DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION (Phase I) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INTERSECTION LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT 1. 2. U. S. 19 & S.R. 580 U.S. 19 & Countryside - 154 125 _ 35 37 3. U.S. 19 & Sunset Pt. - 133 15 - 41 - - _ - - _ - 4. U.S. 19 & Coachman - 149 - - 46 - - - - - - - 5. U.S. 19 & Drew - 31 - 48 - - - 32 - 43 87 65 ' 6. U.S. 19 & S.R. 60 - - 32 - - - - 40 - 29 123 29 7. U.S. 19 & Druid - 30 - - 103 11 2 - - - - - 8. U.S. 19 & Harn - 30 - - 101 - - - - - - - 9. U.S. 19 & Nursery - 28 98 3 2 ' 10. U.S. 19 & Belleair 28 _ _ 84 14 11. U.S. 19 & Haines Bayshore - 28 - - 82 - - - - - - - 12. 13. U.S. 19 & Roosevelt Hercules & Drew = 15 34 - 45 = = 21 = 67 11 14. Hercules & Cleveland 15. Hercules & S.R. 60 - - - - - - - 31 - - 91 - 16. Hercules & Dr! ii d 2 17. Belcher & Old Coachman 29 10 y y 18. Belcher & Sunset Pt. - - - - - - - - - - - - 19. Belcher & Coachman - - - - - - - - - - - - 20. Belcher & Drew 21 68 21. Belcher & Cleveland a 22. Belcher & S.R. 60 - - 8 - - - - 32 - 22 91 - 23. Belcher & Druid 8 22 2 - 1 -24. Belcher & Harn y - 8 - 22 = - = - 25. Belcher & Nursery .22 3 26. Belcher & Belleair - - - - 22 - - - - 14 - 27. Old Coachman & Sunset Pt.. 30 10 28. Old Coachman & Coachman 30 _ - 10 29. Old Coachman &.Drew - 8 - 10 - - - 22 - - 69 22 30. Old Coachman & S.R. 60 - - - - - - - 40 - - 114 8 31. McMullen Booth & Main 55 - 23 15 32. McMullen Booth & Coachman _ 57 = 24 _ = = = = _ 33. McMullen Booth & S.R.. 60 - - - 15 - 36 - 159 - - 66 - 34. Bayshore & S.R. 60 10 .34 166 - 56 35. S.R: 60 & Mall Drive I = i = = 72 181 = 36. S.R. 60 & Mall Drive I1 50 .129 72 51 37. S.R. 60 & Hampton - - - 10:9 - 36 - 50 - - 35 46 38. S.R. 60 &.Sky Harbor - - - - - - - 50 - - 51 - II - 1 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION (Phase II) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT 1. U.S. 19 & S.R. 580 - 316 - 83 - - - - 2. U.S. 19 & Countryside 315 _ 91 _ - 3. U.S.-19 & Sunset Pt. - 294 34 - 102 - - - - - 11 - 4. U.S. 19 & Coachman - 330 - - 111 - - - - - _ _ 5. U.S. 19 & Drew - 234 - 1.13 - - - 72 - 151 201 100 6. U.S. 19 & S.R. 60 - 89 - - - - - 97 - 67 300 67 7. U.S. 19 & Druid - 86 - - 248 - 6 - - - - - 8. U.S. 19 & Harn - 86 - - 244 _ _ - - - - 9. U.S. 19 & Nursery 78 231 .16 6 _ 10. U.S. 19 & Belleair - 66 - - 155 - 10 - - - - - 11. 12. U.S. 19 & Haines Bayshore U.S. 19 & Roosevelt = 63 36 = 190 116 a _ - _ 26 13. Hercules & Drew - 51 - - 181 - 14. Hercules & Cleveland - - - _ _ 15. Hercules & S.R. 60 - - - - - - 74 - - 253 - ' 16. Hercules & Druid - - - - - - - 6 - - 16 - 17. Belcher & Old Coachman - 32 - - [2 -- _ _ 18. Belcher & Sunset Pt. 19. Belcher & Coachman _ _ - 20. Belcher & Drew _ _ _ = y = = 52 = 182 21. Belcher & Cleveland - _ _ 22. Belcher & S.R. 60 - - 17 - - - - 74 - 66 215 - ' _23. Belcher & Druid 17 - 50 16 6 - - 16 - 24. Belcher & Harn 17 50 _ - - - 25. Belcher & Nursery - 17 - - 48 - - A - - 16 - 26. Belcher & Belleair .17 46 - .10 - 33 27. Old Coachman & Sunset Pt. _ 32 - _ 23 - _ 28. Old Coachman & Coachman - 32 - - 23 29. Old Coachman & Drew - 16 - 20 - - - 52 - - 185 32 30. Old Coachman & S.R. 60 - - 6 - - - 91 - 284 .16 31. McMullen Booth & Main _ 130 46 11 34 _ 32. McMullen Booth & Coachman - .133 - - 48 - - -- - - _ - 33. McMullen Booth & S.R. 60 - - - 84 - 34 - 368 - - 157 - ' 34. Bayshore & S.R. 60 23 67 384 - - 1.32 - 35. S.R. 60 & Mall Drive I _ y _ _ - 186 - - 418 - 36. S.R. 60 & Mall Drive 11 - - - 117 - 300 186 - - - 118 29 37. S.R. 60 & Hampton 251 84 - 117 63 128 38. S.R. 60 & Sky Harbor _ y _ 147 • 1 II - 2 ~~r~~-3S~-~~a-_____c~r- AaC~C ~a i DREW STREET PARCEL 1 LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ LIGHT. INDUSTRIAL COMMERIC 81,1.,20 SF 0 81,120 SF AL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 200, ~~0 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING). OFFICE 222,460 SF 182,179 SF 404,639 SF EXISTI ACCE MULTI-FAMILY ~EXlSTING ACCESS LT. INDUSTRIAL 100, 000 SF 100, 000 SF 200, 000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) 403, 580 SF 282,179 SF 685, 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL 0 Q AREA 0 rn ~ Q o Q OFFICE PARCEL 2 ~ z I J~ ~v _ _ f,_ OFFICE z 82,179 SF ~0~,90o sF MULTI-FAMILY PARCEL 8 PARCEL 4 ~ 156 D.U. a (82,179 SF UNDER 001,900 SF EXISTING) G~ ~ CONSTRUCTION) (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) ~P Q F FUTURE ACCESS COMMERICAL A Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (RETAIL) NOTES: Z ~ B S F (120,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. PARCEL 7 O~I~C'E THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. c55,278 SF EXIST 0'V 2 2 0, 5 6 0 S F. 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO PARCELS 7 AND 4~) AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT". THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. AND FOR THE TOTAI::.PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. OMMERCIA 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT fNDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 PARCEL 9 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND (11,303 SF EXISTING) (14,539 SF EXISTING) 8. ' ~ 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF o GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 s UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6. COMMERICAL 25,842 SF ' ~ (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE DUALITY PREPARED FOR, p CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE I U INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED DRAWN P S ERIAITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN a CONSULTANTS, INC. Y AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS 9 1 ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTALISTS SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS a CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. y 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVEL el, (727) 724-8422 - Fox, (727)724-860'3 VELOPMENT PLAN MAP H a0. EXHIBIT "B" TO REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 9 PARK PPLACE DRI NOPC i i i I 1 DREW STREET I i i PARCEL 1 i LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMMERIC 81,1...20 SF 0 81,120 SF AL 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 2~~,~~~ SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) OFFICE 222,:, 46 0 SF 182,179 SF 404, 639 SF ~EXISTI -EXISTING ACCE MULTI-FAMILY ACCESS LT. i N DU STRI AL 100', 000 SF 100, 000 SF 200, 000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 234 D.U. RESIDENTIAL (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL 0 o AREA ~ p a Q O~FI CE ~~Q~ PARCEL 2 ~ 82,179 SF ~ OFFICE ~°J MULTI-FAMILY 101,900 SF PARCEL 8 ~ PARCEL 4 156 ~.U. a (82,179 SF UNDER 001,900 SF EXISTING) CONSTRUCTION) P (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) e~ FUTURE ACCESS COMMERICAL Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (RETAIL) NOTES: 5 5 2 7 8 S F c12o,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) 1. THE PROPOSED .AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. PARCEL 7 OFEI~~E THE AMOUNT QF -TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF ; DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. (55,278 SF EXIST ;ON 2 2 O, 5 6 0 S F i 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPME~JT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO PARCELS 7 AND` 9) AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT°. ~ THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT' IS DECEMBER 31, 2003. OMMERCIA 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 PARCEL g COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS .APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 ~ PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 E 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND (11,303 S EXIS71NG) 04.539 SF EXISTING) 8. 5, PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF GULF-TO-BAY BQULEVARD 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6. COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) e 4 DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR, p CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS ' INC. AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS AUTHORIZED To COMMENCE. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS CHECKED 1639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33,59. PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVEI UELOPM EN T PLAN MAP H o .I, (727) 724-8422 - Fax, (727)724-8606 O.C. EXHIBIT „B„ TO REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 3 PARK PLACE DRI NOPC r 1, . .t a DREW STREE'~ LAND USE S:CHEDI~LE PARCEL 1 ,LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ 55,278 SF 94 722 SF 150 000 SF COMMERCIAL ' LIG~iT INDUSTRIAL 0 150 300 OFFICE 120,560 SF 674;980 SF :795,520 SF '200,000 SF PARCEL 3 ~'i00,000 SF EXISTING) LT. INDUSTRIAL IOO,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF EXISTIN ACCES OFFICE :XISTING ACCESS TOTAL 275,838 SF 8.69,682 SF 1,145,520 SF 258,700 SF Na?ES: "APPROVED FOR 234 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS PURSUANT TO CONVERSION FACTOR IN SUBSECTION 4 AA OF THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT I, SHE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ORDER (ORDINANCE # 5722-95) INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. .THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE NATURAL AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE o EXISTING AREA CEVELOPMENT ORDER. Q ~ ACCESS o o , o~ ° 0 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS . w z TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE "PLANNED Z ~ ~ PAG3CEL 2 z o - DE`~ELOPMENT". THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE . Jo C~IFFICE PAaCEL4 ° ~ ~ BANNED I~EVEI_OPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL. PROJECT _ _ Q I~ DECEMBER 2000.` 12~~~,860 SF 3, CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF PAf~CEL 8 COMMERCIAL ,Jv ~ 7 1 r4OO SF: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE POSSBLE CONVERSION TO 0 APPRO!~ED FOR 156 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS PURSUANT TO CONVENSION OFFICE I HOTEL ~ FACTOfI IN SUBSECTION 4 AA O FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, OR 1,000 SQUARE • THE AtiIEN~ED DEVELOPMENT ORDER ORDINANCE. N 5722-9 ~ F°EET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2,44 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, OR 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO 1,54 MULTI-FAMILY .UNITS, ARE COMMERCIAL P~~ A~~ES 125,000 SF ~v ACCES5 ~ ~ HEREBY ESTABLISHED. 4, ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL. BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2,3, 8 8. (55,278 SF EXISTING) OFFICE ~F- OFFICE r (120,000 SF PLANNED) 5. CONVERSION, RATES OF 1,000 SF of RETAIL QQ~ (120,560 SF EXISTINCa) CI : c ^ c ARCEL 6 roMMERctAL DEVELOPMI=N'i• To 2,75 5F of OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OR 1,000 SF OF RETAIL PARCEL 5 - O r~I l~ G COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 11.96 ROOMS OF PARCEL 7 I HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. TO 4,16 ROOMS: ~OF HOTEL CEVELOPMENT. ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED j F`OR PARCEL 4. . PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 .GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL 25,C)00 SF (RETAIL) (16,837 SF EXISTING) MAP H. 1MVG ENG/NE,ER/NG ASSOCIArES, INC, I PARK PLONCE D R I-REVISED I ED" MASTERv....DEVELOPMENT PLAN Planners. Engineers Surveyors REVISED: JUNE 26, 1996