Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CPA2007-06003
0 PZ1 ?? INELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Municipal Services Building 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 • Clearwater, Florida 33755 Telephone 727.464.8250 • Fax 727.464.8212 • www.pinell March 23, 2009 • ncil.org R24 .PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES School CITY OF CLEARWATER NCIL MEMBERS ?J Beverley Billiris, Chairman 2rry Knight, Vice-Chairman 4ayor Pat Gerard, Secretary ier John Morroni, Treasurer >mmissioner Nina Bandoni ember Sandra L. Bradbury ouncilmember John Doran Mayor Bob Hackworth uncilmember Jim Kennedy rd Member Linda S. Lerner missioner Stephanie Oddo Mayor Jim Ronecker Mayor Patricia J. Shonty D id P H l AICP av . ea ey, Executive Director RE: Review of City of Clearwater's Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal- (EAR-) Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Consistency with the Countywide Rules Dear Mr. Delk: We are in receipt of the adopted EAR-based amendments to the City's comprehensive plan referenced above. Pursuant to Division 3.3 of the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan (Countywide Rules), Council staff has reviewed the adopted amendments for consistency with the Countywide Rules, as follows: • Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy A.2.2.7, establishing that affordable housing density bonuses shall not exceed 50 percent of the density permitted by the Future Land Use Map, is subject to Countywide Rules Section 4.2.3.5, which requires a local government to approve an affordable housing plan and corresponding land development regulations (LDRs), both to be filed with the Council, in order to utilize an affordable housing density bonus. Please note that Section 4.2.3.5 was recently amended in February to provide the minimum standards for an affordable housing plan. The City needs to file an affordable housing plan meeting the current minimum requirements by February 2010. • The amendment adding FLUE Policy A.2.2.8, which addresses locational characteristics, resolves the one comprehensive plan issue identified in the Consistency Report. • The remaining content of the adopted comprehensive plan is either consistent with the Countywide Rules or is not governed by the consistency criteria of the Countywide Rules and therefore is not subject to the consistency provisions. PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY As noted above, the adopted comprehensive plan amendments resolve the one comprehensive plan issue identified in the Consistency Report and summarized in the January 29, 2008 letter to Gina Clayton. In addition to the plan issues, the Consistency Report identified a number of land development code issues. Once the City approves the specified code amendments, the Council staff will ask the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) and Countywide Planning Authority (CPA) to issue the City a current determination of consistency. As a reminder, please forward the code amendments to us at least 21 days prior to the City's first public hearing. Thank you for forwarding the adopted comprehensive plan amendments for review. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 464-8250. Sincerely, r) 0 WA-Z- Christopher M. Mettler Program Planner cc: Councilmember John Doran, PPC Representative o;o;Y,?.-?- 1 ?.?? `wry ? r ^ ?,bLe bbb?s ?`?' ct ? 9 74 ORDINANCE NO. 7993-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AND THE FUTURE LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING, UTILITIES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT, CONSERVATION, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENTS; MAKING SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AS RECOMMENDED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT; MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater adopted a Comprehensive Plan on May 18, 2000 by Ordinance Number 6522-00, subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, certain amendments are statutorily required, and others are advisable in order to harmonize the Comprehensive Plan with state law and good planning practice; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City have been prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of law, after conducting the appropriate planning analysis, and public participation through public hearings, opportunity for written comments, open discussion and the consideration of public and official comments; and WHEREAS, the Citizen Advisory Committee, appointed by the City Council, by adoption of Resolution Number 07-08, as an appropriate way to provide effective public participation in the EAR Based Amendment process, to assist in the preparation of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments required for the Comprehensive Plan, has recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Board, serving as the designated Local Planning Agency for the City, has held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and has recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and Ordinance No. 7993-08 WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for review and comments, and the objections, recommendations and comments received from the Florida Department of Community Affairs have been considered by the City Council, together with all comments from local regional agencies and other persons, in preparing the final'draft of the amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Amendments to the text and maps of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" are hereby adopted: Section 2. Severability. If any section, provision, clause, phrase, or application of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall be deemed severable therefrom and shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3184, 163.3187 or 163.3189, 163.3191, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED December 18, 2008 ank Hibbard Mayor-Councilmember Approved as to form: Y If , '.0.. /'. - 2 ? , a Leslie K. Dougall- es Assistant City Atto ey Attest: ORDINANCE NO. 7993-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AND THE FUTURE LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING, UTILITIES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT, CONSERVATION, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENTS; MAKING SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AS RECOMMENDED IN THE EVALUATION AND - APPRAISAL REPORT; MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES' PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City; and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater adopted a Comprehensive Plan on May 18, 2000 by Ordinance Number 6522-00, subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, certain amendments are statutorily required, and others are advisable in order to harmonize the Comprehensive Plan with state law and good planning practice; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City have been prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of law, after conducting the appropriate planning analysis, and public participation through public hearings, opportunity for written comments, open discussion and the consideration of public and official comments; and WHEREAS, the Citizen Advisory Committee, appointed by the City Council, by adoption of Resolution Number 07-08, as an appropriate way to provide effective public participation in the EAR Based Amendment process, to assist in the preparation of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments required for the Comprehensive Plan, has recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Board, serving as the designated Local Planning Agency for the City, has held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and has recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for review and comments, and the objections, recommendations and comments received from the Florida Department of Community Affairs have been considered by the City Council, together with all comments from local regional agencies and other persons, in preparing the final draft of the amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Amendments to the text and maps of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby adopted. Section 2. Severability. If any section, provision, clause, phrase, or application of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall be deemed severable therefrom and shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3177, 163.3178. 163.3184, 163.3187 or 163.3189, 163.3191, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Leslie K_ Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Frank Hibbard Mayor-Councilmember Attest: , Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 2 R113versheet 0 ' Work Session Council °Chambers - City Hall SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION: • Meeting Date: 12/15/2008 Approve amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and according to comments from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and adopt Ordinance 7993-08 on second reading. SUMMARY: On September 4, 2008, the Clearwater City Council approved on first reading amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). As required by Florida Statutes, the proposed text amendments were submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and other required state agencies for review and comment. The Planning Department has received the Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report from DCA, as well as comments from other review agencies. Certain objectives and policies, as well as maps, must be revised to address objections raised in the ORC. Revisions are proposed to most of the Plan elements, however, many are non-substantive. Substantive revisions are being proposed to policies regarding affordable housing, transportation, and post disaster redevelopment plans. Attached please find a copy of the ORC, the Planning Department's response to the ORC, a motion to amend Ordinance 7993-08 on second reading that incorporates the required revisions to the EAR-based amendments, and a link to access the revised maps. Due to the number of changes proposed to Ordinance 7993-08, the Planning Department will present these revisions to the Community Development Board on December 16, 2008 and will report the Board's recommendation at the December 18th Council meeting. http://msb-laser-app/councilagenda/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4648&MeetingID=194 (1 of 2) (12/12/2008 5:02:37 PM] P-oversheet P eview Approval: • 0 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk http://msb-laser-app/councilagenda/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4648&MeetingID=194 (2 of 2) [12/12/2008 5:02:37 PM] Coversheet Page 1 of 2 1 7 City Council Agenda Council Chambers - City Hall ? R Meeting Date:9/4/2008 SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and pass Ordinance 7993-08 on first reading. SUMMARY: Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The City of Clearwater's EAR, prepared in 2005-2006, was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are proposed to be adopted by the end of 2008. The 2006 EAR was divided into five parts: Part I: Introduction, Part 11: Statutory Issues Assessment, Part III: Issues of Local Concern, Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element, and Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR-based amendments. A total of five issues of local concern were identified as follows: How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment? How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character and livable neighborhoods? How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock? How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation? and How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management? The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) has met nine times for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. Their final meeting was on July 30, 2008. On August 4, 2008, staff presented the item to the City Council for general discussion and comments. On August 26, 2008, the Community Development Board held a public hearing on proposed Ordinance 7993-08. Any additional recommendations made by the CDB will be presented to the Council. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 7993-08 amending the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. This is considered a large-scale amendment that requires approval by DCA. http://msb-laser-app/councilagendaBluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4113&MeetinglD=182 12/3/2008 Coversheet • Page 2 of 2 } Review Approval: 1) Clerk http://msb-laser-app/councilagendaBluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4113&MeetinglD=182 12/3/2008 -" Cover Memo k Aq ? M • Work Session Council Chambers - City Hall SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION: - Approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and pass Ordinance 7993-08 on first reading. SUMMARY: Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The City of Clearwater's EAR, prepared in 2005-2006, was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are proposed to be adopted by the end of 2008. The 2006 EAR was divided into five parts: Part I: Introduction, Part II: Statutory Issues Assessment, Part III: Issues of Local Concern, Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element, and Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR-based amendments. A total of five issues of local concern were identified as follows: How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment? How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character and livable neighborhoods? How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock? How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation? and How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management? The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) has met nine times for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. Their final meeting was on July 30, 2008. On August 4, 2008, staff presented the item to the City Council for general discussion and comments. On August 26, 2008, the Community Development Board held a public hearing on proposed Ordinance 7993-08. Any additional recommendations made by the CDB will be presented to the Council. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 7993-08 amending the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. This is considered a large-scale amendment that requires approval by DCA. 0 Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date:9/2/2008 http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgendaBluesheet.aspx?ItemID=3972&MeetingID=181 9/2/2008 Cover Memo Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgenda/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=3972&MeetinglD=181 Page 2 of 2 9/2/2008 0 0 i Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy. Information List Local Government: City of Clearwater Hearing Date: August 19, 2008 Rescheduled to August 26, 2008 due to T.S. Fay Type Hearing: LPA Public Hearing - Community Development Board (CDB) DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) CITY FILE: CPA2007-06003 EAR-Based Amendments Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs F_.__...?____.... .._ ....._._ _.._...... ,_..__.. _ __.. __.?._. 3 Check Appropriate Identify Address, City, State, I Box Amendment Citizen Name Zip Code- which is of Written Spoken Comment Comment Interest Over for more spaces 0 0 S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\PublicParticipation\EAR Based Citizen List LPA Aug 26 2008.doc -2- i i i i i ? I S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\PublicParticipation\EAR Based Citizen List LPA Aug 26 2008.doc -3- CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartment Correspondence TO: Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director FROM: Sandra Herman, Planner III COPY: Catherine W. Porter, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Mike Reynolds, AICP, Planner III Priyanka Thatte, Urban Designer Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst Nancy Scott, Senior Staff Assistant SUBJECT: Case #CPA2007-06003 EAR-Based Amendments DATE: August 18, 2008 Attached are the revised staff report and other related documents for the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting tomorrow on August 19, 2008 for Agenda Item F-2. The revisions are as follows: 1) Corrected typographical error: Case #CPA2007-06003 rather than CPA2008- 06003 2) Notations were changed for only one exhibit to ordinance 7993-08 - Exhibit A. Previously we had proposed two separate exhibits: Exhibit A for text revisions and Exhibit B for revisions to maps, however, the two were combined into one exhibit. 3) Revised table and revised pages B-9 and B-10 to add two transportation projects for Clearwater as per the recently approved Pinellas County TIP (July 2008) and as recommended by Paul Bertels, Transportation Operations. Manager. I have extra copies for the CDB meeting. 1` V 0 9 CDB Meeting Date: Case # Ordinance #: Agenda Item: REQUEST: Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments ' INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater Planning Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This item involves amending the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, making substantive changes as recommended in the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report' (EAR) in accordance with the Florida State Statutes and Florida Administrative Code. Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved EAR every 7 years. The City of Clearwater's latest EAR was prepared in 2005-2006 with the assistance of consulting firm Wade Trim as well as the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). The City's EAR was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are required to be processed as a large-scale plan amendment and adopted by the end of 2008. The 2006 EAR was divided into five (5) parts: Part I: Introduction, Part II: I Statutory Issues Assessment, Part III: Issues of Local Concern, Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element, and Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR-Based Amendments. The EAR identified a total of five (5) issues of local concern as follows: • How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment? i • How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character. and livable neighborhoods? • How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock? • How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation? ' • How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management? August 19, 2008 CPA2007-06003 7993-08 F-2 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS CADocuments and SettingslSandra.HermanlDesktoplCDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised.doc Page - I CPA2008-06003 if 0 0 On April 4, 2007, the City Council appointed a new Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. The new CAC included several of the members of the CAC that worked on the EAR. The committee met nine (9) times, primarily concentrating on the EAR issues of local concern. The. CAC also reviewed the statutory and editorial changes that are included in the proposed amendments as Ordinance No. 7993-08. Notes from the CAC meetings are on file and may be accessed on the City's website. The City Council reviewed this item at their work session meeting on August 4; 2008 and made recommendations that are in the ordinance including retaining the current wellhead protection policy as recommended by the CAC. A document identifying each change and the source of the change has been prepared. The ordinance has "Exhibit A" that includes changes to the text and maps within the elements (without citations). Data and analysis will be submitted to DCA with these documents as required by Florida Administrative Code 9J-5 Rule. The proposed text amendment meets state statutes and rules by amending current Goals, Objectives and Policies of all of the elements of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report and includes minor editorial changes. ANALYSIS: Ordinance No. 7993-08 which amends the Comprehensive Plan of the City, ,includes substantive and minor editorial changes to the Table of Contents and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements, including maps within the elements, as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The substantive amendments involve updates as recommended by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and such editorial changes as updates to years given for projects, minor text changes and typographical and/or grammatical corrections. The attached document includes the sources identified after each change and the updated maps for the elements. The sources for changes are removed from Exhibit A of the ordinance to go for first reading to City Council. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603(F) no amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: C.• Documents and SettingsISandra.HermanlDesktoplCDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised.doc Page - 2 CPA20081-06003 0 0 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. The proposed amendment further refines the City's existing policies and objectives. The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing goals, objectives, and policies contained in the comprehensive plan. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. The proposed amendment seeks to provide consistent and coordinated efforts for the processes and procedures for preserving and enhancing the natural environment in coordination with other agencies such as Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Tampa Bay Water (TBA) within several of the elements including Conservation, Coastal Management and Future Land Use as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The purpose of this amendment is to amend the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, amending the Table of Contents and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, C: (Documents and SettingsISandra.HermanU)esktoplCDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised.doc• Page - 3 CPA2008-06003 Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School) Facilities Elements, making substantive changes as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and editorial changes, pursuant to Florida Statutes and the Rules of the Florida Administrative Code. The Planning Department Staff recommend APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 7993-08 that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 7993-08 Exhibit A (Comprehensive Plan) Sandra E. Herman Planner III C. (Documents and SettingslSandra.HermanDesktop lCDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised.doc Page - 4 CPA2008-06003 CITY OF CLEARWATER'S EAR-BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY 30, 2008 AND CC WORK SESSION ON AUGUST 4, 2008 Element GOP# Page No. Recommended Change - - By-- - - Transportation B.2.3 B-9 and B- Pinellas Change TIP from FY2011/2012 to FY2008/09-2012/13 and add two new transportation 10 County's New projects as per the new TIP: McMullen Booth at Drew Street and McMullen Booth at TIP Enterprise (lane improvements planned at both intersections B.3.2.3 B 12 CAC Add new Policy B.3.2.3 "The City will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations." B.4.1.1 B12 Editorial Add "e" to end of "on" in front of "thousand (1,000)" B.4.2.4 B13 CAC Change wording to: "A beach trolley system is encouraged to operate in order to reduce automobile trips on Clearwater Beach." Housing C.1.1.2 C3 CC Change the words "shall encourage" to such as: "ma be considered" C.1.1.8 C3 CC Concerned about the word "promote" regarding accessory units, change to "consider" and that restrictions be included in the Community Development Code C.1.3.9 C6 CAC Add "non-profit and for-profit" before housing provider for consistency with C.1.8.9 C.1.6.2 C8 Jim Donnelly Change programming attention to "program attention" C.1.11.3 C11 CAC Add " the Homeless Leadership Network" after "Coalition" Utilities D. Needs D4 Scott Rice For tenth bullet under Stormwater Management - delete the first sentence as the lake Summary project has been completed; change second sentence as follows: "Prospect Lake The will continue to serve..." D.3.3.8 D13 Scott Rice Add "minimum" in front of "finished floor elevations" D.3.4.2 D14 Scott Rice Add "as articulated in the City's annual budget document" to end of sentence D.3.6.1 D15 Scott Rice Replace "supporting the City's general fund or otherwise funded as a utility operation" with "from the City's stormwater utility fee." D.5.5.8 D19 (and Rob Fahey Add new policy for reclaimed water D20) Conservation F.1.3.4 F5 Scott Rice Strike out "environmental management" Recreation G. Needs G1 Editorial Under bullet 5, add "of parkland" after four (4) acres and Open Summary Space 11 • NOTE: There are a few typographical errors that have been corrected. While they are not included with this transmittal, they will be included in the final ordinance. f Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation Policies B) Site design shall provide a deceleration lane or lanes to enter the site without impeding the traffic flow. C) No new traffic signals that will reduce peak hour travel speeds will be permitted, unless a high accident rate exists. D) New or revised median openings will only be permitted where they do not impede free flow of traffic. E) Additional service enhancements, as appropriate. 13.2.2.1 &.24 The City shall require as a condition of permit approval, new development and redevelopment projects adjacent to 8state roads to obtain FDOT. permits as required. B.2.2.2 .i Access points to collector and arterial streets from all development should be limited to one (1) major access point or curb cut along each roadway frontage; additional access and egress points may be granted for unusually large parcels, based on site characteristics or as considered appropriate by the Traffic Engineer and approving agencies, to provide for safe and efficient site-related traffic movements on adjacent street. 13.2.2.3 &2-4 As a condition of site plan or subdivision plat approval for development or redevelopment, the access or egress points, or approved cross access' easements to major collector or arterial streets may be relocated, restricted or otherwise controlled to facilitate traffic flow along the adjacent thoroughfare. (EAR Part 771) 13.2.2.4 1 / -2-4 Out-parcels, created in previously approved developments, shall have rio inherent right of direct access to major collector or arterial streets unless such access is the only access available to the property. New out-parcels may be denied direct access to arterial or collector streets, unless approved by Florida D.O.T: when the development abuts a State road. 13.2.2.5 44 Where appropriate, primary access on backlogged streets should be directed to adjacent non-residential collector streets, with limited secondary access to adjacent arterials. B.2.3 8-.3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's Transportation Improvement Program to include projects that increase the capacity of roadways, and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The following transportation improvement projects that will enhance road capacity are scheduled for construction within City, County and State work programs for FY2008/09 - 2012/13 FY-99 5: B-9 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals, Objectives and Policies Trarisportation Policies Sunset Point Road US 19A to Keene Road County Summary: Construct to a 2 lane divided urban arterial roadway McMullen Booth Road at Drew Street County Summary: Construct southbound right turn lane and extend left turn lanes • McMullen Booth Road at Enterprise Road County Summary: Construct northbound to eastbound right turn lane and receiving lane (EAR Part IV and as per TIP 2008109 - 201212013 adopted July 9, 2008) 13.2.3.1 8.3.1 Road improvements which are currently programmed for construction should be continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational responsibility for those roads. B.2.3.2 When designing roadway improvements, the City will consider incorporating pedestrian and bicycle facilities if physically and financially feasible. (EAR Part II, Statutory Issues: Changes in Location of Development and Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment and Community Character, and Livable Neighborhoods) B.2.4 SA Objective - The City shall actively encourage the expenditure of funds by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Board of County Commissioners to alleviate the most severe congestion problems in support of desired L-1 evels of 8 service. B-10 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 0 Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation based on site characteristics or as considered appropriate by the Traffic Engineer and approving agencies, to provide for safe and efficient site-related traffic movements on adjacent street. 13.2.2.3 &2-4 As a condition of site plan or subdivision plat approval for development or redevelopment, the access or egress points, or approved cross access easements to major collector or arterial streets may be relocated, restricted or otherwise controlled to facilitate traffic flow along the adjacent thoroughfare. B.2.2.4 .2.4 Out-parcels, created in previously approved developments, shall have no inherent right of direct access to major collector or arterial streets unless such access is the only access available to the property. New out-parcels may be denied direct access to arterial or collector streets, unless approved by Florida D.O; T. when the development abuts a State road. 13.2.2.5 &-2-.S Where appropriate, primary access on backlogged streets should be directed to adjacent non-residential collector streets, with limited secondary access to adjacent arterials. B.2.3 8 3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's Transportation Improvement Program to include projects that increase the capacity of roadways, and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The following transportation improvement projects that will enhance road capacity are scheduled for construction within City, County and State work programs for FY2008/09-2012/13 FY99 05: Druid R6ad at Areturas Stiffifnafy? Add tuffi lane en Druid Read • Sunset Point Road US 19A to Keene Road County Summary: Construct to a 2 lane divided urban arterial roadway B-9 2008 EAR Based Amendments -13 - /o 0 s Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation b • SR 60 at Memorial Causeway Sta4e • McMullen Booth Road at Drew Street County Summary: Construct southbound right turn lane and extend left turn lanes • McMullen Booth Road at Enterprise Road County Summary: Construct northbound to eastbound right turn lane and receiving lane Policies 13.2.3.1 8.3.1 Road improvements which are currently programmed for construction should be continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational responsibility for those roads. B.2.3.2 When designing roadway improvements, the City will consider incorporating pedestrian and bicycle facilities if physically and financially feasible. B.2.4 8-A Objective - The City shall actively encourage the expenditure of funds by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Board of County Commissioners to alleviate the most severe congestion problems in support of desired L-1 evels of 8 service. Policies B.2.4.1 8.4.1 The City shall direct its input on the Metropolitan Planning Organization to further the alleviation of the most severe congestion problems before less severe problems are programmed for improvement. B.2.5 8-.5 Objective - The City shall direct its own expenditures toward alleviating its most severe congestion problems, providing continuity in roadway lane arrangements, and providing for economic development and redevelopment needs. Policies B.2.5.1 .54 The City shall incorporate the recommendations of Preliminary Design and Engineering Studies, as accepted by the Florida Department of Transportation, into the Clearwater Transportation T-fa e Gife l Element, as these findings affect future alignments and lane arrangements of State highways. 13.2.5.2 Q The City's mission, vision and/or initiatives will continue to include transportation improvements as articulated in the annual budget document =tee . B.2.6 8 6 Objective - The City shall preserve and protect existing and future transportation corridors by administering Article 3 of the Land Development Code, Division 9, General Applicability Standards which incorporate FDOT's Stand Specifications and Roadway and Traffic and Design Standards and Clearwater's Subdivision Ordinance identify building setbacks to protect rights-of-way in accordance with the Pinellas County Future Rights-of-Way map. B-10 2008 EAR Based Amendments r" TO: CAC Members -0 CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartment Correspondence FROM: Sandra Herman, Planner III COPIES: Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director Gina Clayton, Assistant Director of Planning Catherine W. Porter, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager SUBJECT: Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan - Updates and Tentative Scheduling DATE: August 6, 2008 On August 4, 2008, the Planning Department discussed with the City Council, at their regularly scheduled work session meeting, the proposed EAR-Based Amendments including the recommendations by CAC. A few additional changes were suggested by the City Council. Attached, please find a table and a copy of the pages of the elements that have been updated since your last CAC meeting on July 30, 2008. The Community Development Board is scheduled to hold a public hearing and make recommendations for the EAR-Based Amendments on August 19, 2008. . On September 4, 2008, the City Council will hold a public hearing for the item with first reading of the ordinance. The proposal will then be transmitted to the State Department of Community Affairs. Adoption date by the City Council is projected for December 18, 2008. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4586. CITY OF CLEARWATER'S EAR-BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY :30, 2008 AND CC WORK SESSION ON AUGUST 4, 2008 Element GOP# Page No. Recommended Change By Future Land A. Needs A2 Census Change FLUE needs summary for seasonal population from 21,000 to 10,110 as per 2000 Use Summary census data and verified by BEBR A.1.1.2 A3 CAC / CC Maintain the 1,000 ft. restriction to protect wells (will require a change to the City ordinance from 500 ft. to 1,000 ft. to be more restrictive) A.5.2.8 A19 Econ. Dev. Change "buses operate" to "transit service operates" A.5.6.6 A23 CAC NEW: Encourage the incorporation of historic and current elements of Clearwater character into public art projects. A 6.1.3 A23 CAC Add "excluding Island Estates" after "Clearwater Harbor on the east" A6.6; A27 Planning Remove underline's, except for new numbers. Strikethrough former numbers 2.6; 2.6.1, A6.6.1- 2.6.2,2.6.3 (as per Ordinance No. 7924-08 adopted July 17, 2008) A.6.6.3 A.6.8.1 A28 Ec. Dev. Insert "use of " prior to "mass transit" A.6.8.3 A28 CC Reword policy regarding "vertical enclosure" - make it sound more like the intent of it which is rovidin ; "space" instead of "enclosure" and at a human scale A.6.8.7 A28 CHANGE FROM "Create mixed-use, higher density and livable communities through design and layout, near existing transit lines as well as proposed TBARTA lines and stations. Also support walkability concepts near projected TBARTA stations." TO "Create mixed-use, higher density, livable communities through design, layout and use of walkability techniques within existing and proposed transit corridors, including proposed TBARTA lines and stations." A.6.8.9 A29 Ec. Dev. CHANGE FROM "Promote a variety of transportation choices such as car or van pooling, bicycles and mass transit in order to decrease dependence on the automobile." TO "Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the single-occupancy automobile." A7.1.6 A30 CAC Change first line to "Utilize opinion surveys when considering area(s) for annexation...." r 1?1 u CITY OF CLEARWATER'S EAR-BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY 30, 2008 AND CC WORK SESSION ON AUGUST 4, 2008 Element GOP# Page No. Recommended Change By Transportation B.3.2.3 B12 CAC Add new Policy B.3.2.3 "The City will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations." BA. 1.1 B 12 Editorial Add "e" to end of "on" in front of "thousand 1,000)" B.4.2.4 B 13 CAC Change wording to: "A beach trolley system is encouraged'to operate in order to reduce automobile trips on Clearwater Beach." Housing C.1.1.2 C3 CC Change the words "shall encourage" to such as: "may be considered" " C.1.1.8 C3 CC Concerned about the word "promote" regarding accessory units, change to "consider and that restrictions be included in the Community Development Code C.1.3.9 C6 CAC Add "non-profit and for-profit". before housing provider for consistency with C.1.8.9 C.1.6.2 C8 Jim Donnell Change programming attention to "program attention" C.1.11.3 C11 CAC Add " the Homeless Leadership Network" after "Coalition" Utilities D. Needs D4 Scott Rice For tenth bullet under Stormwater Management - delete the first sentence as the lake Summary project has been completed; change second sentence as follows: "Prospect Lake T-he eyed )a e will continue to serve..." D.3.3.8 D13 Scott Rice Add "minimum" in front of "finished floor elevations" D.3.4.2 D14 Scott Rice Add "as articulated in the City's annual budget document" to end of sentence D.3.6.1 D15 Scott Rice Replace "supporting the City's general fund or otherwise funded as a utility operation" with "from the City's stormwater utility fee." D.5.5.8 D19 (and Rob Fahey Add new policy for reclaimed water D20) Conservation F.1.3.4 F5 Scott Rice Strike out "environmental management" Recreation G. Needs G1 Editorial Under bullet 5, add "of parkland" after four (4) acres and Open Summary Space NOTE: There ai•e a few typographical errors that have been corrected. While they are not included with this transmittal, they will be included in the final ordinance. s ? • Clearwater provides a full spectrum of urban public services and utilities. There are relatively few areas of service deficiencies. The Ci continues to implement and address Deficiencies that must be addiessed expansion of key arterial and collector streets, drainage improvements for enhanced stormwater quality and conveyance quantity, and upgrading wastewater treatment levels. (Editorial) • Within the Clearwater Planning Area, there is a signifi .ant amount of land located in enclaves, and unincorporated areas located along the City's boundaries Approximately 3,700 acres of land within the Planning Area is available for annexation- (City data. ) • Clearwater's redevelopment plans will continue the evolution of a multi-faceted, multi-modael City with tourism being a major industry impacting the City's economic base. (Correct typographical error) As of May i999, August, 2006, t The City's Unsafe Structures Program has resulted in either the demolition or full code compliance of over 1= 47`6 structures. Due to the age of much of the City's commercial and residential structures, this Pprogram must be continued as a means of combating urban blight and spurring redevelopment. (Asper 2006 EAR) • In 2007, the voters, of Pinellas County approved a referendum to ontinne tThe Local Government Infrastructure Surtax (LGIS); or better known as the "Penny for Pinellas",-Was The "Penny for Pinellas" continues to provides funding for infrastructure improvements within the City of Clearwater. (Updated text) • Clearwater has a current population of approximately 110,931 }62,$74 people. Seasonal residents add about 10,110 21,000 people during the winter months. The permanent population is projected to increase to 121,3524.40029,_ by the year 2020 (EAR data; 2000 Census Track Information for seasonal estimate as verified by BEBR) • Clearwater will continue to protect historic resources and properties through the implementation of the City historic designation process- zoning ovei lay disti . (Updated text) • Coordination among governments, business, and civic groups continues to he necessary will be needed to implement comprehensive plan objectives. (Editorial) A-2 2008 EAR Based Amendments a • GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES A.1 GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL CONTINUE TO PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES AND SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND ENSURE THAT THESE RESOURCES ARE SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT THROUGH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS, AND COORDINATION WITH FUTURE LAND USE INTENSITIES AND CATEGORIES. A.1.1 Objective - On an ongoing basis, natural resources and systems shall be protected through the application of local, state, and regional regulations, mitigation and management plans, and permitting procedures as well as through locally instituted land purchase programs focusing on environmentally sensitive properties and significant open space areas. Policies A.1.1.1 Any permanent and temporary alteration of Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.) jurisdictional or non jurisdictional wetlands, the jurisdictional wetlands, of the Sauthwest Florida Water Management District (SWFVV-NM)- beach dunes, sensitive soils, or other natural systems shall be prohibited unless such alteration is fully consistent with all local, state, and federal regulations, mitigation and management plans, and permitting procedures that may be applicable, including the wetland vegetative buffer requirement of the City's Community Development Code. (Part IV of the 2006 EAR) A.1.1.2 No development which has the potential to discharge toxic chemicals (solvents, contaminating fluids battery flaids, acids, etc.) may be permitted within one thousand (1,000) feet of a City water well, unless provision is made to store chemical containers in an enclosure approved by the City and a wellhead protection permit is obtained. (CAC on July 30, 2008 and CC on Aug. 4, 2008) A-1.1.3 Environmentally sensitive wetlands subject to Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) jurisdiction and the jisdictional wetlands of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMM shall be designated by "Preservation" (P) zoning and prevented from being built upon except as permitted by the Preservation Zoning District. (Part IV of the 2006 EAR) A.1.1.4 The provisions of the City of Clearwater Wellhead Protection Ordinance shall be strictly implemented in order to protect a major source of the City's potable water, with the Engineering Public Works Department serving as the chief implementing local agency. (Editorial) A.1.1.5 Stormwater shall be controlled through consistent application of local, state, and federal regulations, mitigation and management plans, and permitting procedures for both site-specific and basin-level development plans. A-3 2008 EAR Based Amendments A_5.2 5 Tdentifv View Corridors distant view or prospect, especially one seen through an min g, as between rows of buildings or trees. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A_52-6 Tdentifv Preservation Corridor-,- corridors or portions of corridors that need to he preserved for their unique character (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A-5-2.7 TdentifV Redevelopment Corridors- those corridors orportions of corridors that need a character change or restoration to a better condition- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Li vable Neighborhoods) A.5-2-9 Identify P.ST.A. Routes- those corridors in the City of Clearwater along which the PSTA (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Anthori ) transit service Qperates- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A,5 Objective.- TTse the city-wide design structure as q guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the 04 of C".lenrwater• (EAR Partin, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Li vable Neighborhoods) A 5 1 Preserve the residential character of the designated scenic non-commercial. corridor of Belcher Road from Sunset Point Road to the northern C'ity T Limits- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes jr. Communi;, Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A.5-12 Maintain the mix of residential and commercial uses along Belcher Road from C',ottntrvside Boulevard to Northeast Coachman Road_ (EARPartIIl, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A.5.3.3 Support the unique, character of Belleair Road h)? maintaining the large lot residential character of the area and the. unique tree canopy formed over the right-of-way(EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A_5.1.4 Protect the golf coarse commnnit)? character of the Cmintryside neighborhood and preserve the residential character, landscaped medians and landscapin along both sides of Countryside Boulevard from S_R 590 to Curlew Road (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A.5.3.5 Preserve the residential character, beautifully lamed medians, sidewalks and landscaping along hoth sides of Ham Boulevard (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A-19 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 0 Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A-5-6.6 Encourage the incorporation of historic and current element,, of Clearwater character into public art projects (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) GOAT. - THE CITY OF CT,FARWATF,R SHALL TITTTIZE TNNOVATTVF, AND FT,F,XTRT,F PT,ANNING AND FNGTNFFRTNG PRACTICES, AND URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS IN ORDER TO PRC)TFCT MSTORTC RFSOITRCFS, ENSURE NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION, RF,DF,VEMP RT,TGHTFD AREAS, AND ENCOURAGE TNFH,T, DEVELOPMENT, A_6 1.4 The use of the den-,4 pool of additional hotel rooms established in Reach hT Dagiu4n- A Preliminarv 1 PCijgn for Clearwater Reach and Design GuidelinPC is permitted in the following real L The land located between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of Mexico between Rockaway Street and Panava Street; and 2- The land located south of the Pier 60 parking lot and north of the southerly lot lines of Tots 77 and 126 of the T,loyd-White-Skinner Subdivision between South Gulf-view Boulevard and Coronado Drive_ A-23 2008 EAR Based Amendments • i A_6.5_1 All proposed development/redevelopment initiatives shall he reviewed for opportunities to improve pedestrian and bicycle access and consider the integration of bicycle and pedestrian transnorta4ion modes in all phases of transportation nla g, new roadway decjgn, r adway constniction, roadway resurfacing and other capital projects consistent with the City's Shifting Geary Ricvrle and Pedestrian Master Plan ?006 On C'1 arwat r Beach' a h pedestrian ankle improvements should adhere to the policies and design guidelines set forth in Reach by Design - A PrPliminan? l?esigg fnr Clearwater Reach and DesiM Guidelines_ (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A_6-5-4 The City shall evaluate the potential for an intra-beach transit system on Clearwater Reach and investigate potential hinding sources A.6.6 2.-6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment; subsequently adopted on July 17, 2008 by Ordinance 7924-08) Policies A-6-6 I 2:6-.-f The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses. A 6_6 2 2:6-2 The City supports the adoption of higher density/intensity standards for overnight accommodation uses such that a sufficient supply shall be available within the City provided that concurrency standards are met. A.6.6.? 2-.6-.a The City shall continue to work with the Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce, Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the Tourist Development Council to promote Clearwater as a tourist destination. A.6.2 Objective - Redevelopment activities shall he sensitive to the city's waterfront and promote appro rn fate pnhlic access to the city's waterfront resources, (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) Policies A 6.7.1 Encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 7 9. Work with applicant-, to discourage the rezoning and land use changes of recreational and commercial working waterfronts. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A-27 2008 EAR Based Amendments • i A.6.8 Objective - identify those areas of the ('.its that are appropriate for redevelopment ns livable communities and require that specific sustainable elements be nsed in the redevelopment of these areas. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6_8_1 Build active, attractive communities that are designed at a human scale and encourage walkingsycling and use of mass transit (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 R 2 Encourage mixed-use development that includes a combination of comnatihl . land uses having fiunctional interrelationships and aesthetic feabires_ (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6_8_.3 Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on streets throilgh minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees, and proportionalil) of building heights to street width.- (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6 9-4 1 Ne native 1 lants in landscaped areas, use xeri.caning wherever possible and protect natural feature- of a developing Site- (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6 8 5 Provide easy access to residential, commercial and recreational area. hT providing direct route. Such as trail-, and continuous sidewalks, between destinations, in order to minimize potential conflicts between pedestrian. and motor vehicles (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A-6-8-6 Rnmirage thedevelopment of interconnected Systems of natural areas nark., sidewalk.., greenways_ trails and open spaces (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A_6-9-7 Create mixed-use, higher den.itT livable communities through deSign layout and use of walkability techniques within existing and .rnI I transit corridors, including proposed TBARTA line. and Stations (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A-28 2008 EAR Based Amendments • i shelters and lighting-(EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A-6-9-9 Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride sharin and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the single-occupancy automobile. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A_69 Objective - Decrease energy consum to inn, use more renewable energy and reduce the impact of the built environment on the natural environment. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A_6.9.1 Pursue Green City Certification from the Florida Green Builder's Coalition (FC(EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6.9.2 SuVI ort the construction or renovation of buildings consistent with US Green Buildi Council's (1TSG;RC) Leadership in F,nergy and Environmental Design (T RED) principles or the (FGRQ Florida Green Building Coalition's Green T,and development and building standards- (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.9_3 Develop incentives for T,FF.D- certified and EMC-certified buildings. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part IN, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) AZ GOAT. - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHAT I, F,NSITRF THE EFFICIENT DFI,iVF,RY OF ITRRAN SERVICES AND UNIFIED LAND USE AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS, AS WELL AS FOSTER COMMUNITY IDENTITY AND REDUCE SOURCES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION THROUGH THE ANNEXATION OF ITNINCORPORATED PROPERTIES WITHIN THE. CLEARWATER PLANNING AREA. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A_7.1 Objective Develop a strategic annexation gram focused on eliminating enclaves and other unincorporated areas within the Clearwater Planning Area. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) Policies- A-7-1-1 Establish an interdepartmental annexation committee to prioritize areas for annexation (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A-29 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 0 Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation MASS TRANSIT B.3 9 GOAL - THE CITY SHALL SUPPORT THE EFFORTS OF MASS TRANSIT SERVICE OPERATORS TO PROVIDE GENERALIZED AND SPECIAL MASS TRANSIT SERVICES. B.3.1 9-4 Objective - Existing and future major trip generators should be provided with fixed route or para transit service when possible Policies 13.3.1.1 9A4 Clearwater supports adequate funding for the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (P-.S:T-A:) to provide fixed route and demand-responsive transit service to increase the mobility of the transit service population. B.3.2 92 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall encourage and promote mass transit with appropriate land use, zoning and land development policies. Policies 13.3.2.1 914 Clearwater shall allow the establishment of park-and-ride lots, and smaller outlying transit terminals where appropriate, to support the operation of the main P.S.T.A. terminal in downtown. 13.3.2.2 Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts, where applicable, for future high- speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. (EAR Part V.) 13.3.2.3 The Citv will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations. (Asper CAC on July 30, 2008) B.4 4$ GOAL - THE CITY SHALL CONTINUE TO ACTIVELY SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATE IN PSTA P.S.T.A. , THE DIRECT PRIMARY TRANSIT SERVICE PROVIDER IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (Editorial). 1.4.1 404 Objective - The City shall require that large scale developments (greater than fifty [50] units) of housing specifically proposed to serve elderly, handicapped or low income populations either locate within one thousand (1,000) two thousand , feet of an existing bus route; if service is not presently available the PSTA P.S.T.A. shall be petitioned to provide service. (City Traffic Operations) Policies 13.4.1.1 10.1.1 Whenever possible, community serving facilities and public offices should be located within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing bus route. (Editorial) B.4.1.2 10.1.2 The City adopts one thousand (1,000) feet as the desired level of Sservice standard for transit service to be applied as the minimum for all major generators and attractors or for all census tracts with a concentration of B-12 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation elderly, handicapped, low income or non-automobile owning households. (City Traffic Operations) 13.4.2 W.2 Objective - Clearwater shall participate with the WO in coordinating the planning and implementation of the Pinellas Mobility Initiative and the Pinellas Guideway which is intended to connect the beach and the downtown amend the T-Fanspof4atien Element to inelude pr-oteetion strategies for- mass 4r-ansit rights of way and exelusiv_e transit eer-r-ider-s at the time the Major- inves4ment Study is eemplete and the County makes a deeision to implement the Guideway system (EAR Part IT9 Policies B.4.2.1 10.2.1- The City shall ensure that the proposed guideway corridors planned bathe Pinellas Mobility Initiative and the Pinellas Guideway (as designated efl the Long Rafige Tfanspei4afien Plan Map) are protected from encroachment, where possible. (EAR Part IT9 B.4.2.2 10.2.2 Acquisition of future mass transit corridors and exclusive right-of-way should be considered eligible expenditures for use of transportation impact fees and for right-of-way r-at time of site plan or plat approval, once the corridors have been included in adopted corridor and right-of-way designation maps. B.4.2.3 10.2.3 Due to the constraints of development and available land, mass transit service shall be urged to provide recreation and commuter employee access to Clearwater Beach and Sand Key. B.4.2.4 10.2.4 AT_he e-xisfing beach trolley system is encoura eg d to operate in order to reduce automobile trips &4A be fe4ained enl ed to allew +er utemob eifeula4iefl on Clearwater Beach. (Editorial for this privately owned trolley company). B.4.3 I" Objective - The City, in coordination with PSTA P.S.T.A. shall continue to develop model designs for transit shelters and benches to be integrated into new and existing development. (Editorial) Policies B.4.3.1 10.3.1 Developers shall be encouraged to incorporate model transit stops with new development where appropriate. B.4.3.2 Where appropriate, the City shall support the placement and/or improvements of the local transit service terminal in the downtown. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern Changes in Redevelopment). B.4.4 44.4 Objective - The City shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to promote the use of mass transit. B-13 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals, Objectives, and Policies Housing C.1 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL - AN AFFORDABLE VARIETY OF STANDARD HOUSING UNITS IN DECENT AND SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS REGARDLESS OF RACE, NATIONALITY, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, HANDICAP, OR RELIGION. C.1.1. ?1 Objective for Adequate Housing Assure an adequate supply of housing in Clearwater by providing for additional new dwelling units in a variety of types, costs, and locations to meet the needs of the residents of the City of Clearwater. Policies C.1.1.1 1-6.1-I Maintain sufficient residentially zoned acreage, of varying densities, and locations, to accommodate the existing and future housing needs of the City of Clearwater. C.1.1.2 16.1.2 Residential Infill Projects, as defined in the Community Development Code, shall be utilized in order to accommodate innovative project designs, which provide for a mix of dwelling types at varying costs. Opportunities and conditions for the provision of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) may be considered for inclusion within infill development and redevelopment projects provided that strict compliance standards be established within the Community Development Code. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.1.3 -1-6.1Through application of the Concurrency Management Section of the Community Development Code, the City of Clearwater shall assure sufficient utility capacity to accommodate an adequate supply of housing. C.1.1.4 16.1.4 The City shall encourage the involvement of private sector financial institutions in recognizing and meeting the community's housing needs. C.1.1.5 -5 The City of Clearwater shall continue to provide information, incentives, and technical assistance to the private sector in order to achieve housing production that meets the needs of very low, low, and moderated middle 1*11-11V households. (Editorial) C.1.1.6 166 The City shall further fair housing goals so that a variety of housing choices are available to households without regard to religion, handicap, age, or race, nation origin, or marital status. C.1.1.7 The City shall further the goal of providing; a variety of housing choices by encouraging land assembly where possible through such things as density bonuses, height increases, and setback reductions. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1._1.8 Consider_ accessory dwelling units wherever they can be accommodated b adequate lot area, and provided that they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C-3 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals Objectives and Policies Housing C.1.3.6 ' 6z6.3.6 Encourage P evide iiieefitives f voluntary, private rehabilitation of owner occupied and rental housing units. (Editorial) C.1.3.7 1-6.3.7 Continue to utilize the Unsafe Structures Program as a means of rehabilitating and/or demolishing unsafe structures within the City of Clearwater. C.1.3.8 46.3.8 Continue to review and update housing related codes to allow optimum use of labor and materials. C.1.3.9 16.3.9 Continue. to contribute to the support of non-profit and for-profit housing housing providers , Tampa-Bay and other organizations promoting neighborhood revitalization and stability. (Editorial) C.1.4 464 Objective for Adequate Sites for Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Households - Continue to provide zoning and land use regulations that allow for the development and redevelopment of affordable housing in stable neighborhoods. Policies C.1.4.1 46.4.1 All assisted housing shall meet the requirements of the Community Development Code, including landscaping, and shall be consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. C.1.4.2 -1-6.4.2 Assisted housing should be located in close proximity to employment centers, mass transit services, parks, and commercial centers. C.i.43 16.4.3 Buildings and grounds at assisted housing locations should be maintained so as to preserve a desirable living environment. C.1.4.4 16.4.4 Maintain residential zoning districts in a variety of densities and locations in order to accommodate more affordable small lots, small and medium size apartments, and mobile homes. C.1.4.5 16.4.5 Continue to utilize zoning to minimize and mitigate commercial encroachment in residential areas. C.1.4.6 1t 4.6 aiid ftftur e -esideR4s. Continue to utilize the Mobile Home Park zoning classification for defining existing and proposed mobile home sites. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.4.7 Neighborhoods shall be encouraged to follow the three Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies of access control, surveillance, and territorial enforcement. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.5 4" Objective for Group Homes and Foster Care Facilities and Sspecial Nneeds Hhousing - Continue to provide zoning and land use regulations which allow the C-6 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals, Objectives, and Policies Housing Policies C.1.6.1 16.6.1 The Community Response Team shall continue to utilize a collaborative code enforcement process for housing in the North andh Greenwood and Lake Belleview neighborhoods and the East Gateway area in order to provide residents with information regarding rehabilitation assistance programs and the additional time needed to bring housing structures in this area into compliance. (Editorial) C.1.6.2 16.6.2 Use Community Development Block Grant, HOME, afld SHIP, and and available funds for programs and improvements throughout the City with special emphasis on North Greenwood, Lake Belleview, and East Gleafwfttef neighborhoods and such other neighborhoods as may require programffmixg-attention. (Editorial) C.1.6.3 1:6.3 Involve private lending institutions in the development of programs that encourage a greater degree of flexibility in lending policies with respect to improving older neighborhoods. C.1.6.4 16.4 Encourage private lending institutions, through their participation in program and project planning, to be more responsive to the home income needs of very low, low, and moderate-income households. C.1.6.5 16.6.5 Involve private lending institutions in the planning and development of programs designed to help with small business economic development loan needs in very low, low and moderate income neighborhoods. C.1.6.6 16-6.6 Improve community services and facilities as appropriate t stafidaf in target revitalization redevelopment areas. (Editoriai) C.1.6.7 16.6.7 Use rehabilitation of public housing units as well as the provision of new housing to increase the housing stock for low and moderate income households. C.1.6.8 1 6.6.8 The City of Clearwater shall continue to protect and preserve historically significant housing and neighborhoods through the implementation of Historic Preservation Section (Division 10) of the Community Development Code. C.1.7 Objective for Relocation Housing - Where public projects of the City require the relocation of individuals and/or families, relocation assistance shall be provided where it is necessary for safe and adequate shelter. Policies C.1.7.1 16:7.1 The City shall provide temporary relocation assistance to enable rehabilitation of substandard housing. C.1.7.2 16.7.2 The City shall provide relocation assistance and counseling, as needed, to effect the clearance of dangerously deteriorated houses. C-8 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals Objectives, and Policies Housinp_ C.1.10.2 Encourage construction of efficient and lasting homes by developing Green Building standards, using resources such as those available through Global Green USA. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing C.1.10.3 Provide "green building; information" to local area housing providers. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.10.4 Work with the local chapter of the USGBC to provide information re ag rding LEED renovation techniques at Neighborhood Week and other outreach events.-(EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) Q.1.10.5 Develop prototypical xeriscape plans that can be provided to local area housing non-profits and neighborhood associations. (EAR, Part Ill, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.110biective - Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other organizations to seek an end to homelessness. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) Policies Q.1.11.1 Cooperate with Pinellas County and other municipalities in implementing provisions found within Opening Doors of Opportunity: A 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness in Pinellas County. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing C.1.11.2 Implement provisions of the 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document that address solutions to homelessness. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.11.3 Continue to participate in the Pinellas County Homeless Coalition, the Homeless Leadership Network and the Pinellas County Homeless Policy Group. C.1.11.4 Continue to work with area housing providers to make shelters and transitional housing and/or programs available to the homeless. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C-11 2008 EAR Based Amendments • Whether sanitary sewer service is currently available-, Whether the property could he efficiently served with solid waste service even thought sanitary sewer service is not readily available, Whether the nr e is located in an enclave, Whether the annexation would alleviate conflicts for public safely services, Whether prcerty giv ,n hi priority in the C".itv'e ,4ewer F, ?nnn.cinn Feasihility Study completed in 2002 Whether nronei y already receives sanitary sewer service; Impact of annexation on City's tax base and enterprise finds- Size of unincorporated area; and F,xtent of neighborhood currently located within the City boundaries- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A 7 1 "3 invoke agreements to annex where properties located within enclaves meet the cnntjgni requirements of Florida Statutes Chapter 171. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A_7 1.4 Explore with Pinellas County the annexation of select enclaves of 10 acres, or le?S I I interlocal agreement pursuant to Florida Statutes Chanter 171. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A.7.1.5 Develop informational materials regarding the costs of annexation and the services and amenities offered by the City of Clearwater and distribute to the public via the City's website, o»en houses and other means- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area 15-Sue) .A_7.1 "6 Utilize opinion surveys when considering are for annexation to determine the feasibility of conducting a referendum pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 171 »rior to initiating an annexation action- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A_7.2 Objective Diversify and expand the City's tax base through the annexation of a varie of land uses located within the Clearwater Planning Area. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A.7 2.1 Consider utilizing the referendum annexation »rovisions pursuant to Florida Statutes Charmer 171 where there are nn registered electors to annex nonresidential properties- (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A_7 2.2 Provide for public facilities and/or improvements to existing facilities to ensure an annro»riate Standard is met for areas being considered for annexation. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A-30 2008 EAR Based Amendments • Goals Objectives and Policies Utilities • , design and engineefiiig of the pfepesed dewntev?% lake whieh has been ifiefidded in the ' Plan. Prospect Lake The pfepas°alake- will continue to serve as a basin for stormwater attenuation and water quality management, as well as enhancing the aesthetic beauty of the downtown area. • The City of Clearwater needs to continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program's Community Rating System (NF1P/CRS). Clearwater has been an active participant since 1990. Potable Water and Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Needs • Clearwater has maintained an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County since 1955 with approximately eighty-pn sixty-three percent 63%) of its water supply emanating from the County. The City also maintains a water use permit issued through the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) to pump an average of & 6.25 million gallons daily (MGD) from its eighteen nineteen active wellheads. The decline in the ability to p edeee potable • tef f e. City' In fneet the 2007, the actual average pumpage from the City's wells is was approximately 3 5 MGD. The balance of the City's water demand is met through purchase from Pinellas County. In order to meet the city's future potable water supply needs in a fiscally responsible manner, several alternative actions must be explored and initiated both individually or in combination with other water supply source alternatives. The City's Water Supply Plan - Capital Improvements Implementation Master Plan (Oct 2004) includes projects based upon cost-benefit analysis that will enable the City to increase its local production of potable water to ten (10) MGD by 2015. Cost benefit analysis will be iieeessafy each aftef a4ive efdef of pfiefi (Engineering Department) • Conservation of potable water supplies is of paramount importance to the City. Clearwater will continue to support Pinellas County and participate in the immediate action to provide for new potable water supplies at a reasonable cost. • Clearwater must continue to utilize and provide efficient use of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes for both public and private use. Furthermore, it must constantly evaluate its approach to the desalination of marine water using reverse osmosis technology to provide a form of potable water backup for periods of drought, and when natural groundwater levels drop to critically low levels. • Clearwater shall continue to explore and participate proportionately in the regional/and or County desalination and/ or reverse osmosis alternative strategies. • The City needs to continue to recognize potable water as a scarce resource and to continue to operate the water utility prudently in implementing both conservation and consumption objectives. The current water consumption rate is approximately one hundred and tm,ef y (12-0) 100 g-allens gallons/person/day, which includes both the seasonal and permanent population of Clearwater and is inclusive of both City produced water and County purchased water. (Engineering Department) • The City needs to continue to coordinate with (SWFWMD) in the study to determine surficial groundwater direction and flow at various depths. Groundwater data will continue to be needed to determine future well sites and conditions of subsurface transmissivity. This data will be an important tool for management of Clearwater's wellhead operation to determine the City's ability to continue to provide future water supplies. (Editorial) D-4 2008 EAR Based Amendments E • Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities 19.3.1- Continue to provide a program of regular maintenance to the stormwater management system to ensure maximum efficiency and performance. Ensure that stormwater management plans include measures to remove trash, sedimentation and other debris which impede flow and incorporate structural and non-structural measures to reduce or eliminate the discharge of oil, grease, heavy metals, and other suspended particles into the stormwater management systems. D.3.3.2 19.3:2 Natural and man-made wetlands shall be considered as a means to provide stormwater management wherever possible and shall be maintained for hydrologic purposes. The efficiency of natural and man-made systems to convey stormwater runoff shall be protected through the provision of routine water quality maintenance schedules overseen by city inspections. D.3.3.3 193 Continue to provide multiple use facilities, such as recreational open space uses, with open channel stormwater management systems, when appropriate. D.3.3.4 19.3.4 Development and redevelopment activities shall comply with all stormwater management design standards and criteria. D.3.3.5 19.3.5 Structural Development shall be prohibited where it is determined that such development will have an adverse impact on stormwater storage areas, increase flood prone areas, significantly increase rates of runoff, or cause other unfavorable drainage conditions. Both man-made and natural systems shall be treated on an equal basis as a sensitive preservation area; no distinction shall be made between a natural system and a man-made or man altered hydrologic system. D.3.3.6 19.3.6 Limit Pfebibit new building development nstpdefi that will 'result in building(s) constructed within/or over stormwater retention/detention ponds, streams or channels. All wetlands, streams, channels, or other hydrologic features, whether wetlands, ponds or bodies of water having intrinsic hydrologic, biologic and zoological functions with no distinction made in regard to its status to whether it is man-made or natural shall be considered for a Preservation Land Use Plan classification to ensure protection from development. (EAR, Part IV) D.3.3.7 19.3 Continue active participation and cooperation with the National Flood Insurance Program and the Florida Emergency Management Agency for the purpose of recognizing flood prone areas, and establishing abatement programs that endeavor toward a reduction in damages and losses due to flooding. D.3.3.8 19.3.8 Continue the established requirement of a twenty-five foot setback from the tops of a bank from all wetlands whether natural or man-made, and require minimum finished floor elevations in areas adjacent to lakes, bays, creeks, the Gulf of Mexico, Tampa Bay and Old Tampa Bay, and other flood prone areas. (Asper Engineering D.3.4 49A Objective Continue the implementation of the most cost effective and efficient plan to reduce the occurrence of street flooding where safety issues and traffic problems exist as prioritized and set forth in the Capital Improvement Element, and listed in the stormwater management plans. Policies D.3.4.1 D-13 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities 19.4 Identify areas where inadequate stormwater management easements exist, and obtain proper access to stormwater management channels, structures and appurtenances for maintenance purposes. D.3.4.2 19.4.2 Improve all street stormwater management systems where deficiencies exist as articulated in the City's annual budget document. (Asper Engineering) D.3.5 4-93 Objective - Protect and enhance the quality of receiving waters by the use of "Best Management Practices" in accordance with the adopted watershed management plans. Policies D.3.5.1 1 9.5.1 The use of -Bbest Mmanagement Ppractices" shall be required before, during, and after construction activities to prevent water pollution resulting from erosion and siltation. D.3.5.2 1-9.5.2 Vegetated swales, sodding, and appropriate landscaping will be required as components of the drainage system for natural filtration before final discharge into receiving waters. D.3.5.3 19.5.3 Monitor major stormwater management outfalls and receiving water bodies to identify the quality of stormwater runoff and the impact on receiving bodies. D.3.5.4 19.5.4 Maximize water recharge potential in designing stormwater management improvements by utilizing natural wetland areas for stormwater storage. D.3.5.5 1-93-5 Coordinate stormwater management improvements with other local governments to assist in solving stormwater management problems of an extraterritorial nature. D.3.5.6 -19.5.6 Continue to ildentify impaired bodies of water and prioritize them for improvement and enhancement. (Editorial) D.3.5.7 19.5.7 Water resource projects shall be consistent with the policies of the Conservation Element and with adopted watershed management plans. D.3.5.8 -19.5 All stormwater management plan projects of the City of Clearwater shall comply with the Florida Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) program and the National Estuary Program. D.3.5.9 -19:3 The City of Clearwater shall continue to upgrade and retrofit City-owned drainage system facilities and include stormwater treatment for water quality in accordance with the proposed stormwater management plan. D.3.6 6 Objective - Continue to pProvide sound fiscal management of the stormwater management systems to include maintenance, operation, and construction in accordance with the watershed management plans and concurrent with its implementa- tion. (Editorial) D-14 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities Policies D.3.6.1 19.6.1 Operation and maintenance of the stormwater management systems may be financed through revenues from the City's stormwater utility fee suppefting the Cib 's genef ' (Asper Engineering) D.3.7 49-.7 Objective - Provide economic development incentives that promote water resource protection and enhancement. Policies D.3.7.1 19.7.1 Methods of financing stormwater management system improvements and new stormwater infrastructure construction should be evaluated to determine the most feasible and equitable arrangement, both city-wide and in local problem areas. D.3.7.2 19. 7.2 The City of Clearwater shall continue to seek and be on notice of financial support for system improvements through grant programs administered by appropriate State and Federal agencies. D.3.7.3 19-3 The City of Clearwater shall pursue a system of regional stormwater management which is both economically and environmentally sound. DA 20GOAL - DISCHARGES OF STORMWATER DISCHARGE SHALL BE MANAGED TO PROVIDE FLOOD PROTECTION FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TO PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND ENHANCE THE WATER QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERBODIES. (Editorial) D.4.1 2#4 Objective - The protection, restoration, and enhancement of water quality associated with stormwater runoff will be c-onsidered a function ^f the Ci yls ^vera11 stor.^.::vate. management plans. Policies DA 1.1 20.1.1 The City shall incorporate water quality protection and enhancement criteria into the City stornwater management plans. D.4.1.2 20.1.2 The use of natural alternatives, the conservation of natural stormwater management systems, and the protection and improvement of the quality of receiving waters shall be a goal of the City's stormwater management plans. D.4.1.3 20.1.3 Management plans shall continue to be developed on an ongoing basis for waterbodies with known or suspected water quality problems in the City to include Tampa Bay, Clearwater Harbor, Stevenson Creek, Allen's Creek, and Alligator Creek. D.4.1.4 20 .4 The City shall systematically and timely prepare watershed or waterbody specific management plans, and update them as necessary for waterbodies within the City. Such plans shall include both water quality and flood control considerations and recommended funding sources. (updated text) D.4.1.5 20.1.5 The City shall implement all City-approved watershed management plans. D-15 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals Objectives and Policies Utilities 21.5.2 The City's building code shall be modified to include the requirement for water conserving fixtures in newly constructed or remodeled buildings. D.5.5.3 2-1.5.3 Manage the supply of water in quantities which would minimize significant adverse impacts on the natural system and protect the long term public interest. D.5.5.4 21 5-4 Develop and modify rate structures and policies which encourage conservation of potable water. D.5.5.5 215 The City of Clearwater shall maintain its current Water Restriction Ordinance. D.5.5.6 21 5.6 Provide educational awareness to inform citizens of the need and opportunities for conserving potable water by visiting schools to speak with young children about water conservation practices. D.5.5.7 21.5.7 Reclaimed water service will continue to be extended to private residences based on the Twenty (20) Yeaf Master- , Reclaimed Water Master Plan Re-Evaluation December, 2007. (EAR, Part ll9 D.5.5.8 When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs, at locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7 years, the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications. (Asper Engineering) D.5.6 24-.6 Objective - Continue to Aachieve effective coordination with other government agencies to solve problems of an extraterritorial nature with cooperation and in conjunction with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). Policies D.5.6.1 21.6.1 The City shall continue to participate in regional and County-wide studies which are or may be formed to seek solutions of problems of an extraterritorial nature. D.5.6.2 21.6.2 Continue to cooperate with the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Tampa Bay Water in developing environmental and hydrologic data that will identify safe and reliable potable water yields in existing and future well-fields. (EAR, Part IV; Pending DCA approval of Ordinance 97950-08) D.5.6.3 21.6.3 Coordinate with appropriate local, State, regional and Federal agencies in implementing the Clearwater Water Master Plan, Capital Improvements Implementation Master Plan, 2004 (EAR, Part IV and Engineering Department) D.5.6.4 21.6r.4 The City shall pursue a coordinated approach to interjurisdictional problems, by providing support of both staff and officials to participate in conservation efforts with Pinellas County and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. D.5.6.5 21.6.5 Ensure consistencv with the actions defined within the Regional Water SUnDly Plan repared by SWFWMD. (Pending DCA approval of Ordinance #7950-08) D-19 2008 EAR Based Amendments 9 0 Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities D.5.7 24.-7 Objective - Continue to protect all natural recharge areas having functional hydrological characteristics. Policies D.5.7.1 21.7.1 Recognize the importance of groundwater aquifer recharge in the hydrological process and the need for natural groundwater recharge as an integral component of the City's urban environment. D.5.7.2 21.7.2 The City of Clearwater shall include incentives in the Community Development Code for the protection of natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as identified in the Conservation Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. D.5.7.3 213 The City of Clearwater shall continue to protect groundwater quality by enforcing Wellhead Protection Ordinance. D-20 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals Objectives and Policies Conservation F.1.3.4 25 -4 Prohibit development that will needlessly disturb or destroy native vegetation. This shall be achieved through the site plan review process and etWifeffiffiefital site inspections. (Asper Engineering) F.1.3.5 25.3.5 Adopt and continue administering regulations providing for the protection of threatened and endangered species and species of special concern. F.1.3.6 25.3.6 The City of Clearwater shall not dredge or intentionally disturb or disrupt the sea floor of any sea waterbody without necessary required permits issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and Army Corps of Engineers. Mitigation shall be recognized as intrinsically worthwhile and not as primary justification for spoil disposal. FAA 25:4 Objective - The City shall continue to manage all conservation areas located in the City to prevent any unnatural disturbance or adverse impacts mistreatment- from the developed urban environment. (Editorial) Policies F.1.4.1 25.4.1 The City shall maintain and enhance Memorial Causeway and continue beautification efforts to ensure its major contribution as a "unique/scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Map, an aesthetic gateway and landmark to Clearwater Beach City bea_h__. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non-commercial Corridor Map). F.1.4.2 25:4.2 The City shall maintain and enhance Edgewater Drive as a "unique/scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Ma3 serfider to ensure its major contribution as an aesthetic gateway and landmark visual image of Clearwater. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non-commercial Corridor Map). F.1.4.3 25:43 The City shall maintain and enhance the Courtney Campbell Causeway/Parkway as a "unique/scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Map, a Florida Scenic Highway, an aesthetic gateway and landmark vistie of Clearwater. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non- commercial Corridor Map; Florida Department of Transportation Florida Scenic Highway Program). F.1.4.4 24-4 The City shall maintain and enhance Bayshore Boulevard as a "unique/scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Map-eeffide+ ensure its major contribution as an aesthetic gateway and landmark visual imue of Clearwater. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non-commercial Corridor Map). F-5 2008 EAR Based Amendments a • Goals, Objectives and Policies Recreation and Open Space G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT The purpose of the Recreation and Open Space Element is to provide the framework and direction for a comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation, including, but not limited to, parks and playgrounds, parkways, beaches and public access to beaches, open spaces, waterways, and other recreational facilities. , Recreation and Open Space Needs Summary The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element: There are three (3) principal land uses within the Recreation and Open Space element: parks, recreation facilities and open space. There a e three (3) elassifie4ieiis of „„°„ spaee and f u ? The benefits of these land uses epen space and related land uses are many and include development pattern, aesthetic, environmental and recreational benefits. These land uses provide a benefit to the City and will continue to be incorporated into development and redevelopment plans. (Editorial). • Currently, 13 4"% of the City's total land area falls under the existing land use classification of "recreation open space," which includes parkland and recreational facilities. cs; . (EAR Part II, Location of Development) • Vacant land (3% of land in the City) provides certain open space benefits to the City, and its loss will continue to be partially offset through the dedication of open space land on-site or elsewhere in the City. (EAR Part II, Location of Development) • Beautification of open space along the gateway corridors is needed to enhance the City's image dDistinguishing "core" parkland, i.e., community, neighborhood, and scenic parks from other "adjunct" parkland1 it found that a cafe. ,+ Level ef' SeFviee (n.l O) .erVJ pee thetis„„a uaa vaa,. a i va • v (1,000) per-seas »ded (EAR Part IV; and editorial) • An established minimum ILevel of s8ervice of four (4) acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) persons for Citywide application will continue to be adequate. (Editorial) • When new recreation and/or park uses are planned to be developed, priority should be given to areas of the city that are deficient uses. (Editorial) • All ages needs of the City's diverse population will be taken into consideration when recreation provisions Reeds are being assessed. Clearwater has a variety of water-based recreation oppor- tunities including beaches, boating and fishing which can continue to be developed for the benefit of both residents and visitors. (Editorial) G-1 2008 EAR Based Amendments r Work Session Council Chambers - City Hall SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION: ® Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: 8/4/2008 Discuss Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). (WSO) SUMMARY: Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The City of Clearwater's EAR, prepared in 2005-2006, was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are required to be processed as a large-scale plan amendment and adopted by the end of 2008. The 2006 EAR was divided into five (5) parts: Part I: Introduction, Part II: Statutory Issues Assessment, Part III: Issues of Local Concern, Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element, and Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR-Based Amendments. A total of five (5) issues of local concern were identified as follows: How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment? How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character and livable neighborhoods? How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock? How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation? and How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management? On April 4, 2007, the City Council appointed a new Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. The new CAC includes several of the members of the CAC that worked on the EAR. The committee has met nine (9) times since its "kick-off ' meeting in April 2007, primarily reviewing and making recommendations on the EAR issues of local concern. The CAC also reviewed the statutory and editorial changes that are included in the proposed amendments. The final CAC meeting will be held on July 30, 2008. Any additional recommendations made by the CAC will be presented to the Council at the August 4th work session. The proposed amendments, as well as a summary of policy issues are provided to facilitate the discussion. Review Approval: 1) Clerk 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) City Manager 5) Clerk 6) City Manager 7) Clerk http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgenda/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=3 8 84&MeetingID=177 8/4/2008 Cover Memo 0 0 Clearwater To: Community Development Board Members From: Catherine W. Porter, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Date: August 1, 2008 RE: EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments You recently received a draft of the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. This document was presented to the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for final recommendation on July 30, 2008. At that meeting several revisions were recommended by staff ac well aq by the CAC. The rnmmittP.e reCommende.d annrnval of tbP nrnnncPrl F.AR_hasPd _ amendments with the exception of the following proposed policy A.1.1.2 located in the Future Land Use Element. A.1.1.2No development which has the potential to discharge toxic chemicals (solvents, contaminating fluids battefy fluff ?, acids, etc.) may be permitted within erne thatisan five hundred (5001 X000) feet of a City water well, unless provision is made to store chemical containers in an enclosure approved by the City and a wellhead protection permit is obtained. City staff recommended the revision to bring consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and the City's Wellhead Protection Ordinance. The proposed distance requirement of 500 feet is the distance specified in the ordinance, as well as in Florida Statutes. The majority of the CAC (vote of 6-2) believed 1000 feet would better protect the health and safety of the public. If Council concurs with the CAC, the Wellhead Protection Ordinance will need to be revised. ??? . ?f ? Zop$ r-- ?} Sci? sst?J71 CITY OF CLEARWATER CHANGES TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY 30, 2008 `7? --- Element GOP# Page No. Recommended Change By Future Land A. Needs A2 Census Change FLUE needs summary for seasonal population from 21,000 to 10,110 as per 2000 Use Summary census data and verified by BEBR A.5.2.8 A 19 Econ. Dev. Change "buses operate" to "transit service operates" A.5.6.6 A23 CAC NEW: Encourage the incorporation of historic and current elements of Clearwater character into public art projects. A 6.1.3 A23 CAC Add "excluding Island Estates" after "Clearwater Harbor on the east" A6.6; A27 Planning Remove underlines, except for new numbers. Strikethrough former numbers 2.6; 2.6.1, A6.6.1- 2.6.2,2.6.3 (as per Ordinance No: 7924-08 adopted July 17, 2008) A.6.6.3 A.6.8.1 A28 Ec. Dev. Insert "use of " prior to "mass transit" A.6.8.7 A28 CHANGE FROM "Create mixed-use, higher density and livable communities through design and layout, near existing transit lines as well as proposed TBARTA lines and stations. Also support walkability concepts near projected TBARTA stations." TO "Create mixed-use, higher density, livable communities through design, layout and use of walkability techniques within existing and proposed transit corridors, including proposed TBARTA lines and stations." A.6.8.9 A29 Ec. Dev. CHANGE FROM "Promote a variety of transportation choices such as car or van pooling, bicycles and mass transit in order to decrease dependence on the automobile." TO "Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the sin le-occu aric automobile." A7.1.6 A30 CAC Change first line to "Utilize opinion surveys when considering area(s) for annexation...." A.7.2.1 A30 CAC Change first line to "Utilize opinion surveys when considering the utilization of the referendum...." Transportation B.3.2.3 B 12 CAC Add new Policy B.3.2.3 "The City will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations." B.4.1.1 B 12 Editorial Add "e" to end of "on" in front of "thousand (1,000)" B.4.2.4 B 13 CAC Change wording to: "A beach trolley system is encouraged to operate in order to reduce automobile trips on Clearwater Beach." 0 • CITY OF CLEARWATER CHANGES TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY 30, 2008 Element GOP# Page No. Recommended By Change Housing C 1. 3.9 C6 CAC Add "non-profit and for-profit" before housing provider for consistency with C.1.8.9 C.1.6.2 C8 Jim Donnell Change programming attention to "program attention" C.1.11.3 C 11 CAC Add " the Homeless Leadership Network" after "Coalition" Utilities D. Needs Summary D4 Scott Rice For tenth bullet under Stormwater Management - delete the first sentence as the lake project has been completed; change second sentence as follows: "Prospect Lake The pFeposed will continue to serve..." D.3.3.8 D13 Scott Rice Add "minimum" in front of "finished floor elevations" D.3.4.2 D 14 Scott Rice Add "as articulated in the City's annual budget document" to end of sentence D.3.6.1 D15 Scott Rice Replace "supporting the City's general fund or otherwise funded as a utility operation" with "from the City's stormwater utility fee." D.5.5.8 D19 (and D20) Rob Fahey Add new policy for reclaimed water Conservation F.1.3.4 F5 Scott Rice Strike out "environmental management" Recreation and Open Space G. Needs Summary GI Editorial Under bullet 5, add "of parkland" after four (4) acres NOTE: There are a few typographical errors that have been corrected. While they are not included with this transmittal, they will be included in the final ordinance. 0 0 • Goals,S hipctives and Policies Future T .2nd Ilse Clearwater provides a full spectrum of urban public services and utilities. There are relatively few areas of service deficiencies. The C i continues to implement and addrese D frciencies expansion of key arterial and collector streets, drainage improvements for enhanced stormwater quality and conveyance quantity, and upgrading wastewater treatment levels. (Editorial) Within the Clearwater Planning Area, there is a si ificant amount of land located in enclaves and unincomnrated areas located along the City's boundaries, Apnroxiz imately 3,700 acres of land within the Planning Area is available for annexation (City data. ) Clearwater's redevelopment plans will continue the evolution of a multi-faceted, multi-modael City with tourism being a major industry impacting the City's economic base. (Correct typographical error) As of May-1999, August, .p? 06, The City's Unsafe Structures Program has resulted in either the demolition or full code compliance of over 1,1124 47$ structures. Due to the age of much of the City's commercial and residential structures, this Pprogram must be continued as a means of combating urban blight and spurring redevelopment. (As per 2006 EAR) • Tn 9.007. he, voters of Pinellas County 2p roved a referendum to continue tThe Local ?JIJVellllAlellt lrll?lasLlllcWU OUIWA `LViS), U1 UeLLel knVwin as the ?Perlrly l)r Plrlellas"-WaJ The "Penny for Pinellas" continues to provides funding for infrastructure improvements within the City of Clearwater. (Updated text) Clearwater has a current population of approximately I10 31 i02 4 people. Seasonal residents add about 10 1.10 21,000 people during the winter months. The permanent population is projected to increase to 171; i i7. -j u by the year 2.02 5 of . ("EAR data; 2000 Census Track Information for seasonal estimate as verified by BEBR) Clearwater will continue to protect historic resources and properties through the implementation of the City historic desiuatinn Process . (Updated text) Coordination among goverzunents, business, and civic groups continues to he nec .se sary will be rr et}cd to implement comprehensive plan objectives. (Editorial) A-2 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 0 A 5 7 5 Tdentify View Corridors- distant view or nrosiect, especially nne seen thrmi an opening. as between rows of buildings or trees. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A 5 7 F Identify Preservatinn Corridors- corridnrs or nnrtions of corridnrs that need to be, preserved r their unimie character (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A 5 7 7 fdentif l Redevelopment Cnrridors- thnse corridors or nnrtinns of corridors that nees a character change or restoration to a better conditinn (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A.5 7.9 Tdentif; P T A Routes- thnse corridors in the City of Clearwater along which the PSTA (Pinellas Simcnast Transit Aiahority) transit service otratfa (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A.5.3 Objective - Ilse the city-wide design structure as a guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the 04 of Clearwater. (EAR Part III, Issues ofluc.?u w1(c.e171: e rlartgeslli Conyr(unilyCharaczerarlci Livablelve?ghborhoocis) A 5 3 1 Preserve. the residential character of the designated scenic non-cnmmercial corridor of Belcher Road frnm ',rnnset Point Road to the northern City TTT -- 1,lTTlll.\'. (CIIA rarl 111, 1JJucs U1 Local l,U17-ce!7! C-IMIIzGJ 111 LU1(1IM-1[lly Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A S ; 7 Maintain the mix of residential and commercial uses along Belcher Road from Ccnmtr; side Boulevard to Northeast Coachman Road (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A 5 ? 3 4nz nnrt the nninrie character of Relleair Rnad h? maintaining the large lot residential character of the area and the unimie tree c2nor3' formed over the, right-n_ f wad (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A S ; 4 Protect the golf course cnmmnnit; character of the Countryside neighhorhand and preserve the residential character. landscaped medians and landscaping adnna tenth cidp.c of rrnintrvcirle Rou]PVArd from q R SRO to C im1pw R pad (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A S.3 5 Preserve the residential character- beautifully landscp ed medians, sidewalks and landscaping alnng hoth sides of HarnRrnilevard (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A-19 2009 EAR Based Amendments Canals OhjPctives and 4es 0 Furore Land Tree Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A 5.6 h Fncniirage the incmmnratinn of historic and current elements of Clearwater charar.ter? into puhlic at projects (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) A-6 GOAT, - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL T1TT1,17,F TNNOVATTVF, AND FLEXIBLE PLANNING ANT) ENGTNEERTNG PRAC'TTC'ES. AND TTRRAN DESIGN STANDARDS TN ORDER TO PROTFC'T HTSTORTC: RFSOTTRC ES, ENSTTRE NETGHRC)RT-1001) PRESERVATION. REDEVELOP BLIGHTED AREAS. AND ENC'OTTRAGF TNFTTA, DEVFT,OPMFNT. A.6.1 Objective - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or Obsolete areas shall he a high riori and promoted throng the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, ci investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. Cr H 0 I / KP.new ment al oTTne Ileacn of distinct dis TniirlsT nlsTrlcT shall tricts within Clearw ne.encniiragen T ater Reach, the amign me es estahlishme Tanllsn- nt of a limited density poo l of additinnal hnt el ronms to h e used in s T.6fied pen phis areas of Clearwater Reach e nhancement- of public rights -of-wad the v acation of Z nhlic rights-of--wad when approp transj) riate m-tafinn i t i t p h d i h it h , f d f l t mprn rights vemen s, n er- and the use eac an ntea- e of desip7i mildehne ac trans an pursuant to s s eve er o Beach bu Dp npmen si?2,7- A Prelirn inarv Design f _ ar Clearwater Rporh , and Design Crui dPlinec A f _ 1 3 The a rea governed b y Reach hU Design- A Prelirmnarv D •n for C'le psi arwate RParh and G ;uidelineC shall he, r ecnanized nn th ? e C nnntvwid P Future Land TTse man as a Commimity RPdevel ozment District. This area is hounded nn the nnrth hY the li ne, dividingthe bloc k hetween Acaci a Street and S omerset Street the Gulf of Mexicn on the w est Clearwater TTarhnr on t he east ex-.hi , ding Island Fs tatp.?, and the. Sand KPy ridge on the. snuth e xc.hidin-g Devn n Avenue and , Ra)?side Thrive R P..achfrnnt and rn , 1h li T nT? incited dj t t th lf G f M k d th T t l W T t t ith F tu ac a Land en o e u Use desiUati o ex n an e nn of Recreatinn/Op n a racnas n en Space shall erway w he excluded a u re from the Cnmm nnit?, Redeyel oz ment District A El 1 4 The u se of the. dens ity non] of additinna l hotel rnoms'es tahlishe.d in Reach by LeshZ n: A Prehmina n2 Design for Opor -water Reach and nPSi?22 Gui delines is per fi tted in the fnll owin reas- L The land lo cated hetween Man dalay Avenue an d the Gruff o f Mexicn h t R k S d 2- e ween o The land lo c away treet and P cated smith of the apaw Street-an Pier 60 parking lnt and nnl- th of the soothe, ly lo t lines of Tots 77 and 176, of the T lnyd-Whit e.-Skinner Subdivision hetween Sowh GuIf yiew Rnulevard and C'ornnad o Thrive A-23 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 Goals, bjectives and Policies Future. Land se A 6 5 ) All nronnsed development/redevelopment initiatives shall he reviewed for opportunities to improve pedestrian and hicycl a ss and consider the integration of hicysle and pedestrian transportation modes in all phases of transnnrtatinn planning, new roadway design, roadway construction- rnadwav resurfacing and other caniz tal projects cnnsistent with the City's Shi tino, Clears Ri(-)zcle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2,006 On Clearwater Reach pedestrian and hicycl improvement,-, should adhere to the policies and design guidelines set fnrth in Rearh'hv Desizu- A PreliminarT Peign far Clearwater Reach and Design GaddehneC (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 5 4 The City shall evaluate the potential fnr an intra-heach transit svstem on Clearwater Reach and investigate potential finding sources A.6.6 2-:6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment; subsequently adopted on July 17, 2008 by Ordinance 7924-08) Policies A 6_6.1 2767± TI hP (-it-i ziinnnrtQ and Pnrniiraaac the rnntiniierl rle.??elnnment and J YY b"" Y" redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses. A 6_f._2 2-6-.2 The City supports the adoption of higher density/intensity standards for overnight accommodation uses such that a sufficient supply shall be available within the City provided that concurrency standards are met. A L L 2-6-37• The City shall continue to work with the Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce, Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the Tourist Development Council to promote Clearwater as a tourist destination. A.6.7 Objective - Redevelopment activities shall he sensitive to the cit. 's waterfront and rromote anpro rp inte public access to the 641,s waterfront resources. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) Policies A 6 7.1 Encourage th Treservatinn of recreatinnal and commercial wnrking waterfrnnts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.7.2 Wnrk with applicants to discourage the re7nningand land use changes of recreational and cnmmercial working waterfrnnts. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A-27 2008 EAR Based Amendments Gnats Ohiertives and Pnliciee Futrure T anti T1- A.(.8 Objective Td .n ifv those areas of the C'it?? that are appropriate for redevelopment as livable communities and require that specific sustainable elements he used in the redevelopment of these areas. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 9.1 Build active, attractive communities that are designed at a human scale. and encourage walkin&s:vclina and use of mass transit (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.8.2 Encourage mixed-use, de.VPlnnmPnt that includes-9 (mmbination of comp alibis land uses having functional interrelationships and aesthetic features (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 .8.1 Where anznrn ri i,9te.development shall] rnvide. a sew of vertical enclosure nn Struts through minimal front sethacksYsimilar building heights street trees and prnportinnalit; of building eights to street widths (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and.FAn Part ill, issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 9.4 1 ice native plants in landscaped areas, fuse xPriscapin_, wherever nossihle. and protect natural features of a dPyel ing site (EAR Part V changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part 111, Issues of Local Concern: 6c' "I A 6 .8.5 Provide easy access, to residential. commercial and recrPatinnal areas b- providing direct routes such as trails and continuous sidewalks between destinatinns, in nrder to minimize -potential conflicts, between pedestrians and motor vehicles (EAR Part V changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.8.6 Fncnnrage thPdevel nnment of interconnecteds)?,stems of natural areas narks sidewalks. greenwa)?s,lrails and ope n ces_(EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A fi 9.7 Create mixed-use, higher density livable communities thrmigh design ln) ut and use of walkahilit; techniques within existing and prop_Tns'ed transit enrridnrsrinclndina nrnnnsed TRARTA lines and stations (EARPart V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rides and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A h 9 -.Design and constrict pedestrian-nri .rated streets to include cnntinurnis tree.- lined sidewalks buffered from traffic by on-stree arking and/nr landscaping and that include pedestrian amenities such as henrhes trash receDt2cles ns A-28 2008 EAR Eased Amendments 0 • Goals Objectives and Policies Futjjre T.and T Tse shelters and lighting. (EAR Part JT changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.9.9 Promote a variety of transncrtaticn modes such as walking. hicycling, ride sharing 2nd mass transit to increase trap Tnrtation choices and decrease dependence on the singlee-nccupncy automobile- (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.9 Objective - Decrease energy consumption, use more renewable enerb and reduce the impact of the built environment on the natural environment. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) AA f 9 1 Pursue Green Ci Certification from the Florida Green Ruilder's Coalition (FC7RCl (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) H h y 2. »>nnar[ II]E_c011str_uctinl]_nr ren?ay_ari2n_of b»i dings c?nsi ?enr wiT:n US-Green Building C'ouncil's (IM(MC) ads hij) in Rnerw and Environmental Desi." (TE.ED rinciples or the, (FGBQ Florida Green Rrnilding C'oalition's Green T and develnnment and huilding staTidards (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A 6 93_ Develop incentives for T.FED- certified and FCTRC-certified huiidings (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A-7 GOAT, - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL ENSURE THE EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF URBAN SERVICES AND UNIFIED LAND USE AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS, AS WF:T1 AS FOSTER COMMUNITY IDENTITY AND REDITCE SOTTRCES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMTNATTON THROUGH THE ANNFXATTON OF UNINCORPORATED PROPFRTTFS WITHIN THE, CITARWATER PLANNING AREA. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A.7.1 Objective Develop a strategic annexation }gram focused on eliminating enclaves and other unincorporated areas within the Clearwater Planning Area. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) Pnlicies- A 7 1 1 Fstahlish an interdepartmental annexation committee to nrinritize areas for annexation (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A-29 2008 EAR Based Amendments • C7 A 7 1.?, When evaluating and prioritizing area-, to annexsnn_sideration Should he given to the following- Whether sanitary .ewer service is cnrr ntly available; Whether the pro arty could he efficiently served with solid waste service even thought sanitary sewer service is not readily available Whether the Trnne is lncated in an n .lave, Whether the annexatinn would alleviate conflicts forty blic. ?afetv services- Whether nropf-.M was given high minrity in the C'ite's Sewer Fyznncion Feacihility St7d4- corm leted in 9002- WhetherpiopeM already receives sanitary sewer service Impact of annexation nn Chi -y's tax base and enterprise fimds- Size of nnincnrnorated area- and Extent of neighhnrhnnd currently lncated within the. (pity hrnmdaries (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A 7 13 Tnvoke agreements to annex where nrolDerties lncated within enclaves, mteet the cnntigni requirement, of Flnrida ?tafiites c1,91)1er 171 (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A 7.1 4. Explore with Pinellas County the annexation of select enclaves of 10 acres nr IP..,z by 1ntPr1nna1 agraament nrnrcrnant to Hlnriria Statutes ('hanter 171 (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A 7 1 S Develop informatinnal materials regardi the cnsts of annexatinn and the services and amenities offered by the City of Clearwater and distrihnte, to the Tnhlic via the City_'s wehsiteTon_en houses and other means (EAR Part III, <JJ?GJ V LIIVUL L.II %<l,G/ %L. l,/LU/L"CJ [%L LarCa 11 rea 1JJ'Lte A 7.1 6i TTtil_ i?e opinion surveys when consid rinT area(s) for annexatinn to determine the feasihility of conducting a referendum pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 171 prior to initiating an annexatinn artinn (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A.7.2 Objective Diversify and expand the City's tax hale through the annexation of a variety of land uses located within the Clearwater Planning Area (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A 7 2 1 Utilize opinion surveys when considering the utilization of the referendum anne_,xatinnp provisions, nnrsuant to Flnrida Statutes Chanter 171 where there are nn registered electors to annex nnnresidential_ nnerties (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A.7 29 Provide for public facilities and/or iml)rnvementc to existing facilities to ensure an an?p--rnnrmte. standard is met fnf areas heing considered fnr annexation -(EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Land Area Issue) A-30 2008 EAR Based Amendments • MASS TRANSIT B.3 GOAL - THE CITY SHALL SUPPORT THE EFFORTS OF MASS TRANSIT SERVICE OPERATORS TO PROVIDE GENERALIZED AND SPECIAL MASS TRANSIT SERVICES. 13.3.1 91 Objective - Existing and future major trip generators should be provided with fixed route or para transit service when possible Policies 13.3.1.1 944 Clearwater supports adequate funding for the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (P-S-.T.A-) to provide fixed route and demand-responsive transit service to increase the mobility of the transit service population. B.3.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall encourage and promote mass transit with appropriate land use, zoning and land development policies. Policies 13.3.2.1 3-.24 Clearwater shall allow the establishment of park-and-ride lots, and smaller outlying transit terminals where appropriate, to support the operation of the main P. TA _ terminal in downtnwn_ 133.2.2 Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts where applicable, for future high- speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. (EAR Part V.) B.3.2.3 The City will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations. (As per CAC on July 30, 200) B.4 44, GOAL - THE CITY SHALL CONTINUE TO ACTIVELY SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATE IN PSTA P.S.T.A. , THE DIRECT PRIMARY TRANSIT SERVICE PROVIDER IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (Editorial). B.4.1 44.4 Objective - The City shall require that large scale developments (greater than fifty [50] units) of housing specifically proposed to serve elderly, handicapped or low income populations either locate within one thousand (1,000) two thousand (2,000) feet of an existing bus route; if service is not presently available the PSTA P.S.T.A. shall be petitioned to provide service. (City Traffic Operations) Policies B.4.1.1 10.1.1 Whenever possible, community serving facilities and public offices should be located within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing bus route. (Editorial) B.4.1.2 10.1.2 The City adopts one thousand (1,000) feet as the desired level of Sservice standard for transit service to be applied as the minimum for all major generators and attractors or for all census tracts with a concentration of B-12 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals Objectives and Policies Transportation elderly, handicapped, low income or non-automobile owning households. (City Traffic Operations) B.4.2 }A? Objective - Clearwater shall participate with the WO in coordinatinIZ the planning and implementation of the Pinellas Mobility Initiative and the Pinellas Guideway which is intended to connect the beach and the downtown strategies rights makes a deeision to implement the Guidev-vay system. (EAR Part Ii,) Policies B.4.2.1 10-2.1 The City shall ensure that the proposed guideway corridors planned by the Pinellas Mobility Initiative and the Pinellas GuidewU (as designated en +he Len-, Range Tfanspei4atieii Plan Map) are protected from encroachment, where possible. (EAR Part Ili B.4.2.2 10.2 Acquisition. of future mass transit corridors and exclusive right-of-way should be considered eligible expenditures for use of transportation impact fees and for right-of-way mat time of site plan or plat approval, once the corridors have been included in adopted corridor and right-of-way designation maps. B.4.2.3 -10-2.3 Due to the constraints of development and available land, mass transit service shall be urged to provide recreation and commuter employee access to Clearwater Beach and Sand Key. B.4.2.4 10.2.4 ATE , beach trolley system is encouraged to operate in order to reduce automobile trips small I be fetaifted and enh-aRee I ~^• on Clearwater Beach. (Editorial for this privately owned trolley company). B.4.3 4" Objective - The City, in coordination with PSTA P.S.T.Z^., shall continue to develop model designs for transit shelters and benches to be integrated into new and existing development. (Editorial). Policies B.4.3.1 10.3.1 Developers shall be encouraged to incorporate model transit stops with new development where appropriate. B.4.3.2 Where appropriate, the City shall support the placement and/or improvements of the local transit serv ice terminal in the downtown. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern Changes in Redevelopment). B.4.4 I$:4 Objective - The City.shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to promote the use of mass transit. B-13 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals Objectives and Policies Housin-- C.1.3.6 4673-.6-Encourage nr^ a^ ^^^^* ^^ fvoluntary, private rehabilitation of owner occupied and rental housing units. (Editorial) C.1.3.7 16.3.7 Continue to utilize the Unsafe Structures Program as a means of rehabilitating and/or demolishing unsafe structures within the City of Clearwater. C.1.3.8 16.3 Continue to review and update housing related codes to allow optimum use of labor and materials. C.1.3.9 16.3.9 Continue to contribute to the support of non-profit and for-profit housing housing providers Clear-seater e gghbeizheea Heesii g Sel-v `ai:np^ R'y and other organizations promoting neighborhood revitalization and stability- (Editorial) C.1.4 X6:4 Objective for Adequate Sites for Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Households - Continue to provide zoning and land use regulations that allow for the development and redevelopment of affordable housing in stable neighborhoods. Policies C_1.4.1 16.4.1 All assisted housing shall meet the requirements of the Community Development Code, including landscaping, and shall be consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. C.1.4.2 16.4.2 Assisted housing should be located in close proximity to employment centers, mass transit services, parks, and commercial centers- C.1.4.3 16.4.3 3 Buildings and grounds at assisted housing locations should be maintained so as to preserve a desirable living environment. C.1.4.4 16.4.4 Maintain residential zoning districts in a variety of densities and locations in order to accommodate more affordable small lots, small and medium size apartments, and mobile homes. C.1.4.5 1-6.4.5 Continue to utilize zoning to minimize and mitigate commercial encroachment in residential areas. C.1.4.6 16.4.6 MpDi e ^IImZGs shall be maintained as an aff4dable heusing eptiefi 1Vniti1J 1111` andfiitare -residents. Continue to utilize the Mobile Home Park zoning classification for defining existing and proposed mobile home sites. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.4.7 Neighborhoods shall be encouraged to follow the three Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ?CPTED) strategies of access control, surveillance, and territorial enforcement. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing C.1.5 I Objective for Group Homes and Foster Care Facilities and Sspecial Nneeds Hhousing - Continue to provide zoning and land use regulations which allow the C-6 2008 EAR Rased Amendments Goals, Objectives, and Policies Housing Policies C.1.6.1 16..6.1 The Community Response Team shall continue to utilize a collaborative code enforcement process for housing in the North and Seuth Greenwood and Lake Belleview neighborhoods and the East Gateway area in order to provide residents with information regarding rehabilitation assistance programs and the additional time needed to bring housing structures in this area into compliance. (Editorial) C.1.6.2 16.62 Use Community Development Block Grant, HOME, and SHIP, and any other available funds for programs and improvements throughout the City with special emphasis on North Greenwood, Lake Belleview and East Gateway Gle&Fwatef: neighborhoods and such other neighborhoods as may require programmiizg attention. (Editorial) C.1.6.3 16.6.3 Involve private lending institutions in the development of programs that encourage a greater degree of flexibility in lending policies with respect to improving older neighborhoods. C.1.6.4 16.6.4 Encourage private lending institutions, through their participation in program and project planning, to be more responsive to the home income needs of very low, low, and moderate-income households. C.1.6.5 16.6.5 Involve private lending institutions in the planning and development of programs designed to help with small business economic development loan needs in very low, low and moderate income neighborhoods. C.1.6.6 16.6-6 Improve community services and facilities as appropnate t-e--an-a&ee table standard in target revitalization f:edeveiepmen areas. (Editorial) C. L6.7 16.6.7 Use rehabilitation of public housing units as well as the provision of new housing to increase the housing stock for low and moderate income households. C.1.6.8 16.r.8 The City of Clearwater shall continue to protect and preserve historically significant housing and neighborhoods through the implementation of Historic Preservation Section (Division 10) of the Community Development Code. C_1.7 162.7 Objective for Relocation Housing - Where public projects of the City require the relocation of individuals and/or families, relocation assistance shall be provided where it is necessary for safe and adequate shelter. Policies C.1.7.1 1-6:7.1 The City shall provide temporary relocation assistance to enable rehabilitation of substandard housing. C.1.7.2 16.7.2 The City shall provide relocation assistance and counseling, as needed, to effect the clearance of dangerously deteriorated houses. C-8 2008 EAR Based Amendments • Goals Objectives, and Policies Housing C.1.102 Encourage construction of efficient and lasting homes by developin Green Building standards, using resources such as those available through Global Green USA. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.10.3 Provide "green building information" to local area housing providers. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.10.4 Work with the local chapter of the USGBC to provide information regarding LEED renovation techniques at Neighborhood Week and other outreach events.-(EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) Q.1.10.5 Develop prototypical xeriscape plans that can be provided to local area housing non-profits and neighborhood associations. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.110biective - Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other oraanizations to seek an end to homelessness. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) Policies t.,.l. t 1.1 ?.oopzratc_ with rii{ciias?,vuu?y ariuvuici rtiilriici{iaiities iii_ implementing provisions found within Opening Doors opportunity: A 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness in Pinellas County. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C.1.11.2 Implement provisions of the 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document that a:iddre.qc cohitinnc to hnmPlP.c?nPSC /FAR Port TTT &.cVp n f T.n,-171 Concern: Housing) C.1.11.3 Continue to participate in the Pinellas County Homeless Coalition, the Homeless Leadership Network and the Pinellas County Homeless Policy Group. C.1.11.4 Continue to work with area housing providers to make shelters and transitional housing and/or programs available to the homeless. (EAR, Part III, Issue of Local Concern: Housing) C-11 2008 EAR Based Amendments • • Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities • plana-iiiig, design and b b . Prospect Lake The pr-eposed fake will continue to serve as a basin for stormwater attenuation and water quality management, as well as enhancing the aesthetic beauty of the downtown area. • The City of Clearwater needs to continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program's Community Rating System (NFIP/CRS). Clearwater has been an active participant since 1990. Potable Water and Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Needs • Clearwater has maintained an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County since 1955 with approximately (80',Izo) sixty-three percent (63%) of its water supply emanating from the County- The City also maintains a water use permit issued through the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) to pump an average of 9 6.25 million gallons daily (MGD) from its e eea nineteen active wellheads- The deeline in the ability -tepred{tce potable +ef ^m vn=v'c=ar ?rrva?i o MGD. In 2007, the actual average pumpage from the City's wells is was approximately :3 5 MGD. The balance of the City's water demand is met throw-_h purchase from Pinellas County. In order to meet the city's future potable water supply needs in a fiscally responsible manner, several alternative actions must be explored and initiated both individually or in combination with other water supply source alternatives. The City's Water Supply Plan' - Capital Improvements Implementation Master Plan (Oct 20042 inrlnrles nrnierts based rnnnn rnst-han-FJt analysis that will enable the City to increase its local production of potable water to ten (10) MGD by 2015- Gest benefit analysis will be n , ? T eh altef ati- e ^rd^f of pFierit (Engineering Department) • Conservation of potable water supplies is of paramount importance to the City. Clearwater will continue to support Pinellas County and participate in the immediate action to provide for new potable water supplies at a reasonable cost. • Clearwater must continue to utilize and provide efficient use of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes for both public and private use. Furthermore, it must constantly evaluate its approach to the desalination of marine water using reverse osmosis technology to provide a form of potable water backup for periods of drought, and when natural groundwater levels drop to critically low levels. • Clearwater shall continue to explore and participate proportionately in the regional/and or County desalination and/ or reverse osmosis alternative strategies. • The City needs to continue to recognize potable water as a scarce resource and to continue to operate the water utility prudently in implementing both conservation and consumption objectives. The current water consumption rate is approximately one hundred and +,.^^'-' (100) gga-lferts gallons/person/day, which includes both the seasonal and permanent population of Clearwater and is inclusive of both City produced water and County purchased water. (Engineering Department) • The City needs to continue to coordinate with the-Se;Thv,,est FleFid Maftag r,; ,trite (SWFWMD) in the study to determine surficial groundwater direction and flow at various depths. Groundwater data will continue to be needed to determine future well sites and conditions of subsurface transmissivity. This data will be an important tool for management of Clear-water's wellhead operation to determine the City's ability to continue to provide future water supplies. (Editorial) D-4 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals Objectives and Policies 0 Utilities 19.3.1 Continue to provide a program of regular maintenance to the stormwater management system to ensure maximum efficiency and performance. Ensure that stormwater management plans include measures to remove trash, sedimentation and other debris which impede flow and incorporate structural and non-structural measures to reduce or eliminate the discharge of oil, grease, heavy metals, and other suspended particles into the stormwater management systems. D.3.3.2 1935Natural and man-made wetlands shall be considered as a means to provide stormwater management wherever possible and shall be maintained for hydrologic purposes. The efficiency of natural and man-made systems to convey stormwater runoff shall be protected through the provision of routine water quality maintenance schedules overseen by city inspections. D.3.3.3 19.3.3 Continue to provide multiple use facilities, such as recreational open space uses, with open channel stormwater management systems, when appropriate. D.3.3.4 -19.3.4 Development and redevelopment activities shall comply with all stormwater management design standards and criteria. D.3.3.5 19.3 Structural Development shall be prohibited where it is determined that such development will have an adverse impact on stormwater storage areas, increase flood prone areas, significantly increase rates of runoff, or cause other unfavorable drainage conditions. Froth man-made and natural systems shall be treated on an equal basis as a sensitive preservation area-, no distinction shall be made between a natural system and a man-made or man altered hydrologic system. D3.3.6 19.3.6 Limit Pfeh bit bids diaig, development ef: rs+rueti ? that will result in building(s) constructed within/or over stormwater retention/detention ponds, streams "I-a--,?-'Q i?+?I ---i?5i-l,C - -- --- -1.,n-?11 FAQ - -`',- • ' -ur"r " - t- , ,. wetlands, ponds or bodies of water having intrinsic hydrologic, biologic and zoological functions with no distinction made in regard to its status to whether it is man-made or natural shall be considered for a Preservation Land Use Plan classification to ensure protection from development. (EAR, Part IV) D.3.3.7 19.3.7 Continue active participation and cooperation with the National Flood Insurance Program and the Florida Emergency Management Agency for the purpose of recognizing flood prone areas, and establishing abatement programs that endeavor toward a reduction in damages and losses due to flooding. D.3.3.8 19.3.8 Continue the established requirement of a twenty-five foot setback from the tops of a bank from all wetlands whether natural or man-made, and require minimum finished floor elevations in areas adjacent to lakes, bays, creeks, the Gulf of Mexico, Tampa Bay and Old Tampa Day, and other flood prone areas. (Asper Engineering) D.3.4 1-9-4 Objective Continue the implementation of the most cost effective and efficient plan to reduce the occurrence of street flooding where safety issues and traffic problems exist as prioritized and set forth in the Capital Improvement Element, and listed in the stormwater management plans.. Policies D.3.4.1 D-13 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 • Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities 19.4.1 Identify areas where inadequate stormwater management easements exist, and obtain proper access to stormwater management channels, structures and appurtenances for maintenance purposes. D.3.4.2 19.4.2 Improve all street stormwater management systems where deficiencies exist as articulated in the City's annual budget document. (Asper Engineering) D.3.5 49.5 Objective - Protect and enhance the quality of receiving waters by the use of "Best Management Practices" in accordance with the adopted watershed management plans. Policies D.3.5.1 19.5.1 The use of LBbest Mmanagement Ppractices" shall be required before during, and after construction activities to prevent water pollution resulting from erosion and siltation. D.3.5.2 2 Vegetated swales, sodding, and appropriate landscaping will be required as components of the drainage system for natural filtration before final discharge into receiving waters. D.3.5.3 19.5:2 Monitor major stormwater management outfalls and receiving water bodies to identify the quality of stormwater runoff and the impact on receiving bodies. D.3.5.4 19.5.4 Maximize water recharge potential in designing stormwater management improvements by utilizing natural wetland areas for stormwater storage. D.3.5.5 19.5 .5 Coordinate stormwater management improvements with other local governments to assist in solving stormwater management problems of an extraterritorial nature. __3. 1 / 19.5.6 Continue to ildentify impaired bodies of water and prioritize them for improvement and enhancement. (Editorial) D.3.5.7 19-5.7 Water resource projects shall be consistent with the policies of the Conservation Element and with adopted watershed management plans. D3.5.8 14:5.8 All stormwater management plan projects of the City of Clearwater shall comply with the Florida Surface Water Improvement and Management (SW11\4) program and the National Estuary Program. D.3.5.9 19.5.9 The City of Clearwater shall continue to upgrade and retrofit City-owned drainage system facilities and include stormwater treatment for water quality in accordance with the proposed stormwater management plan. D.3.6 X9:6 Objective - Continue to pProvide sound fiscal management of the stormwater management systems to include maintenance, operation, and construction in accordance with the watershed management plans and concurrent with its implementa- tion. (Editorial) D-14 2008 EAR Based Amendments 0 • Goals, Objectives and Policies Utilities Policies D.3.6.1 19.6.1 Operation and maintenance of the stormwater management systems may be financed through revenues from the City's stormwater utility fee b . (Asper Engineering) D.3.7 1-9-.7 Objective - Provide economic development incentives that promote water resource protection and enhancement. Policies D3.7.1 19x:1- Methods of financing stormwater management system improvements and new stormwater infrastructure construction should be evaluated to determine the most feasible and equitable arrangement, both city-wide and in local problem areas. D.3.7.2 4-9.72 The City of.Clearwater shall continue to seek and be on notice of financial support for system improvements through grant programs administered by appropriate State and Federal agencies. D3.7.3 19.7.3 The City of Clearwater shall pursue a system of regional stormwater management which is both economically and environmentally sound. DA GOAL - DISCHARGES OF S T ORl'Vl VV A T ER DISCHARGE SHALL BE 1'V1ANAGED TO PROVIDE FLOOD PROTECTION FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TO PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND ENHANCE THE WATER QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATER-BODIES. (Editorial) D.4.1 2" Objective - The protection, restoration, and enhancement of water quality associated ' management plans. Policies DA. 1.1 20.14 - The City shall incorporate water quality protection and enhancement criteria into the City stommwater management plans. DA-1.2 -20-12 The use of natural alternatives, the conservation of natural stormwater management systems, and the protection and improvement of the quality of receiving waters shall be a goal of the City's stormwater management plans. D.4.1.3 20.1.3 Management plans shall continue to be developed on an ongoing basis for waterbodies with known or suspected water quality problems in the City to include Tampa Bay, Clearwater Harbor, Stevenson Creek, Allen's Creek, and Alligator Creek. D.4.1.4 20.1.4 The City shall systematically and timely prepare watershed or waterbody specific management plans, and update them as necessary for waterbodies within the City. Such plans shall include both water quality and flood control considerations and recommended funding sources. (updated text) D.4.1.5 20.1.5 The City shall implement all City-approved watershed management plans. D-15 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals Objectives and Policies 0 • Utilities 21.5.2 The City's building code shall be modified to include the requirement for water conserving fixtures in newly constructed or remodeled buildings. D.5.5.3 21.5.3 Manage the supply of water in quantities which would minimize significant adverse impacts on the natural system and protect the long term public interest. D.5.5.4 21.5.4 Develop and modify rate structures and policies which encourage conservation of potable water. D.5.5.5 21.5-6 The City of Clearwater shall maintain its current Water Restriction Ordinance. D.5.5.6 21.5.6 Provide educational awareness to inform citizens of the need and opportunities for conserving potable water by visiting schools to speak with young children about water conservation practices. D.5.5.7 21.5.7 Reclaimed water service will continue to be extended to private residences based on the Twenty r20ve.,_ ra.,stef P, Reclaimed Water Muster Plan Re-Evaluation, December, 2007. (EAR, Part IV) D.5.5.8 When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs, at locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7) years, the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications._(As per Engineering) D.5.6 2-" Objective - Continue to Aachieve effective coordination with other government agencies to solve problems of an extraterritorial nature with cooperation and in conjunction with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). Policies D.5.6.1 2-1-6.1 The City shall continue to participate in regional and County-wide studies which are or may be formed to seek solutions of problems of an extraterritorial nature. D.5.6.2 21.6.2 Continue to cooperate with the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Tampa Ba_y Water in developing environmental and hydrologic data that will identify safe and reliable potable water yields in existing and future well-fields. (EAR, Part IV,- Pending DCA approval of Ordinance 97950-08) D.5.6.3 21. 6.3 Coordinate with appropriate local, State, regional and Federal agencies in implementing the Clearwater Water Master Plan, Capital Improvements Implementation Master Plan 2004 vtater system -pIan. (EAR, Part IV and Engineering Department) D.5.6.4 21.6.4 The City shall pursue a coordinated approach to interjurisdictional problems, by providing support of both staff and officials to participate in conservation efforts with Pinellas County and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. D.5.6.5 21.6.5 Ensure consistency with the actions defined within the Regional Water Supply Plan prepared by SWFWMD. (Pending DCA approval of Ordinance 47950-08) D-19 2008 EAR Based Amendments Utilities Goals Objectives and Policies 0 D.5.7 Objective - Continue to protect all natural recharge areas having functional hydrological characteristics. Policies D.5.7.1 1 Recognize the importance of groundwater aquifer recharge in the hydrological process and the need for natural groundwater recharge as an integral component of the City's urban environment. D.5.7.2 21.7.2 The City of Clearwater shall include incentives in the Community Development Code for the protection of natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as identified in the Conservation Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. D.5.7.3 3 The City of Clearwater shall continue to protect groundwater quality by enforcing Wellhead Protection Ordinance. D-20 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals, Objectives and Policies Conservation F.1.3.4 25.3.4 Prohibit development that will needlessly disturb or destroy native vegetation. This shall be achieved through the site plan review process and ei a?=???en?Tal ?a geraez?t site inspections. (4s per Engineering) F.1.3.5 5 Adopt and continue administering regulations providing for the protection of threatened and endangered species and species of special concern. F.1.3.6 25.3.6 The City of Clearwater shall not dredge or intentionally disturb or disrupt the sea floor of any sea waterbody without necessary required permits issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and Army Corps of Engineers. Mitigation shall be recognized as intrinsically worthwhile and not as primary justification for spoil disposal. F.1.4 2-5-.4 Objective - The City shall continue to manage all conservation areas located in the City to prevent any unnatural disturbance or adverse impacts mistreat ,from the developed urban environment. (Editorial) Policies F.1.4.1 7?31+ f 1 ne Lily snap maintain ano enhance lvlemonai (-:auseway and continue beautification efforts to ensure its major contribution as a "unique/scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial--Corridor Ma p- an aesthetic gateway and landmark to Clearwater Beach Git (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non-commercial Corridor Map). r n n -25.4.2 The City shall maintain and enhance Edgewater Drive as a "unique scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Map eerr44E)f to ensure its major contribution as an aesthetic gateway and landmark visual irnab of Clearwater. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non-commercial Corridor Map). F.1.4.3 25.4.3 The City shall maintain and enhance the Courtney Campbell Causeway/Parkway as a "unique/scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Map a Florida Scenic Highway, an aesthetic gateway and landmark viii al ire of Clearwater. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non- commercial Corridor Map; Florida Department of Transportation Florida Scenic Highway Program). F.1.4.4 25.4.4 The City shall maintain and enhance Bayshore Boulevard as a "unique scenic view" on the Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Map der to ensure its major contribution as an aesthetic gateway and landmark vial image of Clearwater. (Consistency with Pinellas Planning Council Rules and Countywide Scenic/Non-commercial Corridor Map). F-5 2008 EAR Based Amendments Goals Objectives and Policies Recreation and Open Space G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT The purpose of the Recreation and Open Space Element is to provide the framework and direction for a comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation including but not limited to, parks and playgrounds parkways beaches and public access to beaches open spaces waterways and other recreational facilities. Recreation and Open Space Needs Summary The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element: There are three (3) principal land uses within the Recreation and Oven Space element: parks recreation facilities and open space. There are thi:ee (3) elassifie,-Aiens ef epen space and (4) The benefits of these land uses epex space and related land uses are many and include development pattern, aesthetic, environmental and recreational benefits. These land uses provide a benefit to the City and will continue to be incorporated into development and redevelopment plans. (Editorial). • Currently, 13 44-9% of the City's total land area falls under the existing land use classification of "recreation open space," which includes parkland and recreational facilities. aiid i-neludes?arks (EAR Part II, Location of Development) • Vacant land (3% of land in the City) provides certain open space benefits to the City, and its loss will continue to be partially offset through the dedication of open space land on-site or elsewhere in the City. (EAR Part II, Location of Development) • Beautification of open space along the gateway corridors is needed to enhance the City's image dDistinguishing "core" parkland, i.e., community, neighborhood, ffilm, and scenic parks from other "adjunct" parkland-- it is fund that ^ fA Level of e e (4.9) ^ -esper one theusaBd (1,000) per-sens is . (EAR Part IV; and editorial) An established minimum ILevel of sService of four (4) acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) persons for Citywide application will continue to be adequate. (Editorial) • When new recreation and/or park uses are planned to be developed priority should be given to areas of the city that are deficient areas of the Qt are a^fi^i^r+ of ^ s t- pes of parrs and sheuld be the pr-ieri+ll fo ^tie (Editorial) • All ages needs of the City's diverse population will be taken into consideration when recreation provisions fieeds are being assessed. Clearwater has a variety of water-based recreation oppor- tunities including beaches, boating and fishing which can continue to be developed for the benefit of both residents and visitors. (Editorial) G-1 2008 EAR Based Amendments CITY OF CLEARWATER CHANGES TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY 30, 2008 Element GOP# Page No. Recommended Change B Future Land A. Needs A2 Census Change FLUE needs summary for seasonal population from 21,000 to 10,110 as per 2000 Use Summary census data and verified by BEBR A.5.2.8 A19 Econ. Dev. Change "buses operate" to "transit service operates" A.5.6.6 A23 CAC NEW: Encourage the incorporation of historic and current elements of Clearwater character into public art projects. A 6.13 A23 CAC Add "excluding Island Estates" after "Clearwater Harbor on the east" A6.6; A27 Planning Remove underlines, except for new numbers. Strikethrough former numbers 2.6; 2.6.1, A6.6.1- 2.6.2,2.6.3 (as per Ordinance No. 7924-08 adopted July 17, 2008) A.6.6.3 A.6.8.1 A28 Ec. Dev. Insert "use of " prior to "mass transit" A.6.8.7 A28 CHANGE FROM "Create mixed-use, higher density and livable communities through design and layout, near existing transit lines as well as proposed TBARTA lines and stations. Also support walkability concepts near projected TBARTA stations." TO "Create mixed-use, higher density, livable communities through design, layout and use of walkability techniques within existing and proposed transit corridors, including proposed TBARTA lines and stations." A.6.8.9 A29 Ec. Dev. CHANGE FROM "Promote a variety of transportation choices such as car or van pooling, bicycles and mass transit in order to decrease dependence on the automobile." TO "Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the single-occupancy automobile." A7.1.6 A30 CAC Change first line to "Utilize opinion surveys when considering area(s) for annexation...." Transportation B.3.2.3 B 12 CAC Add new Policy B.3.2.3 "The City will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations." B.4.1.1 B 12 Editorial Add "e" to end of "on" in front of "thousand (1,000)" B.4.2.4 B13 CAC Change wording to: "A beach trolley system is encouraged to operate in order to reduce automobile trips on Clearwater Beach." • S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\FINALPO STCACCORRECTIONS\ChangestoElementsTableCDB. doc CITY OF CLEARWATER CHANGES TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS FOLLOWING CAC MEETING ON JULY 30, 2008 Element GOP# Page No. Recommended B Change Housing C 1.3.9 C6 CAC Add "non-profit and for-profit" before housing provider for consistency with C.1.8.9 C.1.6.2 C8 Jim Donnell Change programming attention to "program attention" C.1.11.3 C 11 CAC Add " the Homeless Leadership Network" after "Coalition" Utilities D. Needs Summary D4 Scott Rice For tenth bullet under Stormwater Management - delete the first sentence as the lake project has been completed; change second sentence as follows: "Prospect Lake The will continue to serve..." D.3.3.8 D13 Scott Rice Add "minimum" in front of "finished floor elevations" D.3.4.2 D14 Scott Rice Add "as articulated in the City's annual budget document" to end of sentence D.3.6.1 D15 Scott Rice Replace "supporting the City's general fund or otherwise funded as a utility operation" with "from the City's stormwater utility fee." D.5.5.8 D19 (and D20) Rob Fahey Add new policy for reclaimed water Conservation F.1.3.4 F5 Scott Rice Strike out "environmental management" Recreation and Open Space G. Needs Summary G1 Editorial Under bullet 5, add "of parkland" after four (4) acres NOTE: There are a few typographical errors that have been corrected. While they are not included with this transmittal, they will be included in the final ordinance. • • S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\FINALPOSTCACCORRECTIONS\ChangestoElementsTableCDB . doc -2- POLICY ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE EAR-BASED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS July 25, 2008 Future Land Use Element Two new future land use plan classifications (Transportation/Utility Overlay and Drainage Feature Overlay) added to the future land use table. These categories will be applied consistent with the Countywide Rules of the Pinellas Planning Council. Policy added allowing affordable housing density bonuses. Goal created that establishes a citywide design structure to guide redevelopment and land use decisions. Objective added that creates a hierarchy of places within the city and the linkages between them. A map and list of those places are attached and include the following categories: Hierarchy of Places Activity Centers Destination Points Multi-neighborhood shopping areas Neighborhoods Neighborhood shopping centers Landmarks Neighborhood character features Linka es Gateways Trails Designated Scenic Non-Commercial Corridors Scenic Corridors View Corridors Preservation Corridors Preservation Corridors Redevelopment Corridors Policies added to preserve and maintain the character of the following corridors: • Belcher Road from Sunset Point Road to the City Limits; • Belcher Road from Countryside Boulevard to Northeast Coachman Road; • Belleair Road; • Countryside from S.R. 580 to Curlew Road; • Ham Boulevard; • Keene Road; • Nursery Road between Belcher and U.S. 19.- and • Cleveland Street from Highland Avenue to Belcher Road. New policies provided to guide the redevelopment of the corridors such as: • South Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue from Lakeview Road to Woodlawn Avenue; • Lakeview Road between South Fort Harrison and South Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenues; • North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue between Fairmont and Drew Streets; • Missouri Avenue between Drew Street and Belleair Road; • Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard east of U.S. 19; • Drew Street between Myrtle Avenue and U.S. 19; and • South Fort Harrison Avenue between A and E Streets. Objective and policies provided in support of public art. Added policy recognizing the need to conduct surveys to identify potential historic resources. Proposed policies to form a historic preservation steering committee to promote historic preservation and research historic preservation issues and to work with the Harbor Oaks Neighborhood to determine whether there is interest in pursuing local historic designation. Objectives and policies developed to support livable communities concepts such as mixed-use development; human scale development which includes minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, vertical enclosure, etc; interconnected system of parks, sidewalks, trails; location in close proximity to existing and future transit lines; pedestrian-oriented streets; and transportation choices. Objectives and policies geared to decreasing energy consumption by pursing green city certification, supporting LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and FGBC (Florida Green Building Coalition) certified building construction and considering the development of incentives for LEED and FGBC certified buildings. New goal, objectives and policies added to support annexation. Policies provide to use when evaluating and prioritizing areas to annex; support working with Pinellas County to annex enclaves of 10 acres or less through interlocal agreement; and to consider using referendum annexation provisions where there are no registered electors. Transportation Element Policy added to support transportation concurrency alternatives such as Multimodal Transportation Districts for Downtown, the Beach and other potential redevelopment areas. Policy provided that requires the coordination of planning efforts for future high-speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. Decreased the distance large-scale elderly and low-income housing developments should be from PSTA routes from 2,000 feet to 1,000. 2 Changed the Level of Service (LOS) for transit service for major generators and attractors from 2,000 feet to 1,000. Policy added supporting an improved or relocated bus terminal in Downtown Clearwater. Policy added recognizing the need to coordinate with Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA) on transit routes and park and ride lots. New objective and policies added as required by the designation of the Courtney Campbell Causeway as a Florida Scenic Highway. Housing Element Policy added promoting the use of accessory dwelling units where there is adequate lot area to support an additional unit. Provided a definition of affordable housing which includes any unit leased or owned by a household with a household income of 120% or less of the adjusted area median family income for Pinellas County. Rental rates for affordable unit shall not exceed rates published by the Florida Housing finance Corporation for the Tampa-St. Petersburg- Clearwater Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Sales price for non-rental units may not exceed 90% of the average area price of the MSA. Revised the definition of "suitable for rehabilitation" as those units requiring repairs equal to 50% of their value or $50,000, whichever is less instead of 75% of the value. Added a definition of special needs housing which includes housing for the homeless, the elderly, persons with disability, persons with alcohol or other drug addiction and other categories as the city may specify. Clarified objective regarding the role of the Clearwater Neighborhood and Affordable Housing Advisory Board (NAHAB). Objective and policies added incentivizing the construction of affordable housing. Objective and policies added promoting the use of sustainable ("green") building techniques for affordable housing. Objective and policies added regarding the need to address homelessness. Utilities Element Established a minimum LOS for sanitary sewer service for the City instead of having a LOS for each service district. Coastal Management Element Revised focus of policy supporting trolley service between the mainland to Clearwater Beach to reflect City Council's position that the service should be re-instituted when more downtown redevelopment occurs. Policy added to consider code amendments to support the reuse of historic resources in the coastal areas. New policies added encouraging the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts, marinas and other water-dependent uses, as well as discouraging the rezoning of these properties. Additionally, a policy added to support the addition of accessory transient docks/slips through the code and special area plans. Policy added prohibiting vehicular traffic on public beaches, except at the Sailing Center, the Courtney Campbell and Memorial Causeways. Policy included requiring disaster plans for hospitals, nursing homes and assisted living facilities to be kept on file with the Emergency Management Coordinator. Another policy added requiring evacuation plans for all hotels within the coastal storm area that requires hotel closure when a hurricane watch is posted. New objective and polices provided regarding the components to be addressed in post- disaster development plans such as repair and cleanup, assessment of infrastructure and redevelopment of repeated damaged properties. New goal and objective recognize the importance of economic activities in the coastal storm area and the need to reestablish businesses after a disaster. Policies focus on working with local businesses and the Chambers on hurricane preparedness and recovery. Policy added that requires the City to amend the Tourist District to added water- dependent uses as a minimum standard use in the Code. At present there are no minimum standard uses in the Tourist District. Policy added supporting the development of incentives for water-dependent and water- enhanced uses. Conservation Element No major policy issues. Recreation and Open Space Element Eliminated the subdistrict park Level of Service standard as well as references to mini parks throughout the element. 4 Deleted LOS standards for different types of facilities and specified that the city should provide parks and recreation facilities consistent with the 2002 Parks and Recreation System Master Plan as funding is available. Added new objective and policies regarding the implementation of the following plans: The 2002 Master Parks and Recreation System Master Plan; the 2002 Clearwater Cultural Plan and the Public Art Ordinance, and Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. A policy also supports the completion of the Aging Well Master Plan. Intergovernmental Coordination Element New policy supporting strengthened coordination between the City, Pinellas County, other municipalities, the Florida Department of Transportation, and the Metropolitan Planning Organization for measuring and maintaining LOS standards of state and county roadways. Added policies regarding the need to coordinate with the Pinellas Planning Council to revise the county-wide approach to mixed-use calculations and the implementation of Pinellas by Design. Added policy to strengthen the coordination with DCA, FDOT, TBPRC, and Pinellas County to promote the concept of livable neighborhoods. Policy proposed regarding the need of the City to work with Pinellas County to eliminate the issuance of septic system permits in areas served by the City's sewer system. New policy added supporting the development of an interlocal agreement between the City and County regarding the timing of maintenance responsibility of streets and drainage facilities as a result of annexation. Proposed policy that supports starting a dialogue with Pinellas County regarding the annexation of enclaves less than 10 acres in area through the Interlocal Agreement provisions of F.S. 171. Capital Improvement Element Revised policies specifying when and how the Capital Improvement Element is to be adopted (once a year when the City's annual operating and capital budget is approved) and that it must be financially feasible as required by Florida Statutes. Clearwater City Commission ession Item #: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: ()4/(14/07 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: APPOINT a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) to assist in the preparation of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments required for the Comprehensive Plan and PASS Resolution No. 07-08. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City's Comprehensive Plan was prepared and submitted for public hearing and adoption by the City Council on September 21, 2006 pursuant to Resolution 06-49. Following the public hearing and adoption process, the Planning Department sent the EAR to the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review and a determination of sufficiency. DCA sent a letter of determination of sufficiency to the City on November 29, 2006. All related and required EAR-based amendments as identified in the report and as per the 2005 state statutory requirements, are required to be adopted within 18 months from the date of DCA's letter. In order to meet the state-mandated timelines, the ordinance for the EAR-based amendments will be prepared for the transmittal hearing and 1St reading of the ordinance for the City Council meeting on October 18, 2007. The City of Clearwater has determined that the citizen advisory committee (CAC) is an appropriate way to provide effective public participation in the EAR-based amendments process. The proposed CAC is comprised of representatives from the neighborhood districts in the City of Clearwater as well as representatives of the City at large thus the CAC represents the many diverse interests within the community. Planning staff recommends approval of resolution no. 07-08 to appoint the Citizen Advisory Committee as shown in Exhibit A to provide public participation with the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments process. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs Legal Info Srvc N/A PLANNING DEPARTMENT Total Sandra Herman Budget N/A Public Works N/A User Dept.: Funding Source: Purchasing N/A DCM/ACM Planning Current FY Cl Risk Mgmt N/A Other Attachments: OP Resolution No. 07-08 STAFF REPORTS Other Submitted by: Appropriation Code: Citv Manaaer ? None W Printed on recvcled eaner 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 07-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, APPOINTING THE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED AMENDMENTS PROCESS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs through Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires all local governments in Florida to adopt amendments to their comprehensive plans related to the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) process; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of Chapter 163 that the public participate in the EAR based amendments process to the fullest extent possible; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of local planning agencies and local governmental units to adopt procedures designed to provide effective public participation in the EAR based amendments process; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has determined that the establishment of the CAC is an appropriate way to provide effective public participation in the EAR Based Amendment process; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater is required to adopt amendments to update the Comprehensive Plan based on the evaluation and appraisal report within 18 months after November 29, 2006 when the report was determined to be sufficient by the State Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to establish, for the EAR Based Amendment Process, the CAC composed of representatives from the neighborhood districts in the City of Clearwater and representatives of the City at large who will represent the many diverse interests within the community; now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Clearwater, Florida: Section 1. The CAC for the Comprehensive Plan EAR process is established for the EAR-based amendment process and consists of the members as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2. That the CAC will employ the process outlined in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, in the Comprehensive Plan review for the City of Clearwater. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Resolution No. 07-08 • PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of Aril, 2007. Approved as to form: dj, - e'; ? / 6,0, & Leslie K. Doug l ides Assistant City At ney 0 Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Attest: y is E. Goudeau Cit Jerk Resolution No. 07-08 pp- EXHIBIT A CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Name 1. Frank Dame 2. Bill Day 3. Ron Delp 4. Barbara Green 5. Judy Melges 6. Duke Tieman 7. Gloria Bailey 8. Alex Plisko, Jr. 9. Norma Carlough 10. Vonabell Sherman 11. Elizabeth France 12. Bill Murray 13. Rob Boos 14. Helen Kerwin 15. J.B. Johnson 16. Glenn Bailey 17. Laura St. Clair Neiahborhood District 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 Pinellas County Planning Department Downtown Resolution No. 07-08 • • CDB Meeting Date Case # Ordinance Agenda Item: August 19, 2008 CPA2007-06003 7993-08 F-2 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS REQUEST: Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater Planning Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This item involves amending the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, making substantive changes as recommended in the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) in accordance with the Florida State Statutes and Florida Administrative Code. Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved EAR every 7 years. The City of Clearwater's latest EAR was prepared in 2005-2006 with the assistance of consulting firm Wade Trim as well as the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). The City's EAR was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are required to be processed as a large-scale plan amendment and adopted by the end of 2008. The 2006 EAR was divided into five (5) parts: Part I: Introduction, Part II: Statutory Issues Assessment, Part III: Issues of Local Concern, Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element, and Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR-Based Amendments. The EAR identified a total of five (5) issues of local concern as follows: • How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment? • How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character and livable neighborhoods? • How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock? • How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation? • How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management? S: (Planning DepartmentlCOMPREHENSIVE PLANI2008 Comprehensive P1anIEARBasedAmendmentslCDBiCDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised. doc Page - 1 CPA2008-06003 • • On April 4, 2007, the City Council appointed a new Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. The new CAC included several of the members of the CAC that worked on the EAR. The committee met nine (9) times, primarily concentrating on the EAR issues of local concern. The CAC also reviewed the statutory and editorial changes that are included in the proposed amendments as Ordinance No. 7993-08. Notes from the CAC meetings are on file and may be accessed on the City's website. The City Council reviewed this item at their work session meeting on August 4, 2008 and made recommendations that are in the ordinance including retaining the current wellhead protection policy as recommended by the CAC. A document identifying each change and the source of the change has been prepared. The ordinance has "Exhibit A" that includes changes to the text and maps within the elements (without citations). Data and analysis will be submitted to DCA with these documents as required by Florida Administrative Code 9J-5 Rule. The proposed text amendment meets state statutes and rules by amending current Goals, Objectives and Policies of all of the elements of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report and includes minor editorial changes. ANALYSIS: Ordinance No. 7993-08 which amends the Comprehensive Plan of the City, includes substantive and minor editorial changes to the Table of Contents and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements, including maps within the elements, as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The substantive amendments involve updates as recommended by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and editorial such changes as updates to years given for projects, minor text changes and typographical and/or grammatical corrections. The attached document includes the sources identified after each change and the updated maps for the elements. The sources for changes are removed from Exhibit A of the ordinance to go for first reading to City Council. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603(F) no amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: S: (Planning DepartmentlCOMPREHENSIVE PLAM2008 Comprehensive Plan 1EARBasedAmendmentslCDBICDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised.doc Page - 2 CPA2008-06003 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. The proposed amendment further refines the City's existing policies and objectives. The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing goals, objectives, and policies contained in the comprehensive plan. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in questions and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. The proposed amendment seeks to provide consistent and coordinated efforts for the processes and procedures for preserving and enhancing the natural environment in coordination with other agencies such as Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Tampa Bay Water (TBA) within several of the elements including Conservation, Coastal Management and Future Land Use as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The purpose of this amendment is to amend the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, amending the Table of Contents and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, S: (Planning DepartmentlCOMPREHENSIVE PLAM2008 Comprehensive Plcm EARBasedAmendmentslCDBICDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised doc Page - 3 CPA2008-06003 Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements, making substantive changes as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and editorial changes, pursuant to Florida Statutes and the Rules of the Florida Administrative Code. The Planning Department Staff recommend APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 7993-08 that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Sandra E. Herman Planner III ATTACHMENT: Ordinance No. 7993-08 S: (Planning DepartmenACOMPREHENSIVE PLAM2008 Comprehensive Plan1EARBased4mendmenlslCDBICDB staff report for ord 7993-08 August 19, 2008 Revised.doc page - 4 CPA2008-06003 rFL Southwest Florida _. d mater Management District 9 N'9CEM£r - . An Equal Opportunity Employer Neil Combee Chair, Polk Todd Pressman Vice Chair, Pinellas Jennifer E. Closshey Secretary, Hillsborough Ronald E. Oakley Treasurer, Pasco Bryan K. Beswick Desoto Patricia M. Glass Manatee Hugh M. Gramling Hillsborough Albert G. Joerger Sarasota Sallie Parks Pinellas Maritza Rovira-Forino Hillsborough H. Paul Senft, Jr. Polk Douglas B. Tharp Sumter Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L Moore Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) October 15, 2008 LJ 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Lecanto Service Office Sarasota Service Office Tampa Service Office Suite 226 6750 Fruitville Road 7601 Highway 301 North 3600 West Sovereign Path Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (941) 377-3722 or (813) 985-7481 or (352) 527-8131 - 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) - '--- -- 1-800-836-0797-(FL only) Ray Eubanks, Plan Review Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Subject: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Dear Mr. Eubanks: I` ll nnnn ` OCT 2 Q i Cl r- In accordance with Chapter 163, F.S., the staff of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) has reviewed the above referenced Comprehensive Plan amendment and offers the following comments for your consideration. To complete an appropriate review of the above referenced plan amendment, please include Appendix J (Potable Water Element 2008) from Disk CPA2007- 06003. The folder for Appendix J was empty and none of the other folders contained this element. Review of this particular element is critical for the District, since it is water related and revisions were discussed with City of Clearwater staff and consultants. Please send me this element and any other missing water resource related information electronically at iason.mickel(cD.watermatters.org or via CD. The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review of comprehensive plan amendments. Please note that this review does not constitute permit approval under Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), or any rules promulgated thereunder, nor does it stand in lieu of normal permitting procedures in accordance with Florida Statutes and District rules. If I, may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (352) 796-7211, extension 4423. Sin in M. Mickel for Planner cc: Gina L. Clayton,100 South Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Jim Quinn, Department of Environmental Protection (via e-mail) CLA-TPA 04 P-% Pon-Consumer wane v7EST p 9?ACEM ? O An Equal Opportunity Employer Neil Combee Chair, Polk Todd Pressman Vice Chair, Pinellas Jennifer E. Closshey Secretary, Hillsborough Ronald E. Oakley Treasurer, Pasco Bryan K. Beswick Desoto Patricia M. Glass Manatee Hugh M. Gramling H i I Isborough Albert G. Joerger Sarasota Sallie Parks Pinellas Maritza Rovira-Forino Hillsborough H. Paul Senft, Jr. Polk Douglas B. Tharp Sumter Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L. Moore Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel 6V'vo o b fia. ? t?aQ s ?ayy-ec. el? lU J??Aos 3M Pose Consumer Was[e 9 southwest Florida Water Management District Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) Lecanto Service Office Suite 226 3600 West Sovereign Path Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 October 15, 2008 Ray Eubanks, Plan Review Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Fl- r -I L--.A 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at. WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office Tampa Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road 7601 Highway 301 North Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (941) 377-3722 or (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-320-3503-(Ft-on1y) - 1-800-836?7977(FL onl"y)- t r- ?,_.,?' I -? l i I OCT 202 PLANK. DEVELOPME`.- SERVICES I "; ' OF CLEARWATER Subject: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Dear Mr. Eubanks: ?C i v e? o Z Z `0 $ SEf? In accordance with Chapter 163, F.S., the staff of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) has reviewed the above referenced Comprehensive Plan amendment and offers the following comments for your consideration. To complete an appropriate review of the above referenced plan amendment, please include Appendix J (Potable Water Element 2008) from Disk CPA2007- 06003. The folder for Appendix J was empty and none of the other folders contained this element. Review of this particular element is critical for the District, since it is water related and revisions were discussed with City of Clearwater staff and consultants. Please send me this element and any other missing water resource related information electronically at iason.micket(aD or via CD. The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review of comprehensive plan amendments. Please note that this review does not constitute permit approval under Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), or any rules promulgated thereunder, nor does it stand in lieu of normal permitting procedures in accordance with Florida Statutes and District rules. If I may be of. further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (352) 796-7211, extension 4423. Sincgfely, son M. Mickel nior Planner cc: Gina L. Clayton, 100 South Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Jim Quinn, Department of Environmental Protection (via e-mail) CLA-TPA h'ZGc?V Gcc/e55' hv.5 -D 6P. &[ ,_4e . T(US I ® BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Pi ll Robert 8. Stewart - Chairman ne as Calvin D. Harris -Vice Chairman t C Ronnie E. Duncan oun y Susan Latvala PLANNING John Morroni Karen Williams Seel Kenneth T. Welch October 10, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2356 C? C OCT -6 . PLANNii, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER RE: Clearwater 08-2AR (EAR-based amendments) Dear Mr. Eubanks: As part of the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)-Based Amendments Review Process, the Pinellas County Planning Department, as the County Land Planning Agency, has reviewed the referenced City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendment package. The review and recommendations are developed in accordance with the requirements of Section 163.3184(5), F.S. and Chapter 9J-11.010, F.A.C., and consider the effect and relationship of the proposed EAR-Based Amendments to the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. The County has the following recommendations and comments regarding the City's proposed EAR-based amendments: • It is recommended that the City add a policy to the Future Land Use Element indicating that they will implement the Metropolitan Planning Organization's livable communities model objectives and policies, as applicable to Goal A.6. and Objective A.6.8. • In the Capital Improvements Element, Policy 1.1.1.8. states that the `City shall, in cooperation with Pinellas County as approved by voters in March 1997, maintain a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax for the purpose of supplementing PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 600 Cleveland Street Suite 750 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Phone: (727) 464-8200 Fax: (727) 464-8201 Website: www.pinellascounty.org isJ Letter to Ray Eubanks Dated October 10, 2008 Page 2 current revenue sources in order to fund the capital improvements called for in this Plan'. It is recommended that the City update the statement to include the 2010-2020 tax extension that was approved by voters in March 2007. • Pinellas County appreciates the City's commitment to coordination with regard to levels of service, water supply planning and water conservation. • Pinellas County supports the City's intent to adopt the coastal storm area and related policies for managing coastal development. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment package, and if you have any questions regarding the findings above, please feel free to contact me at 464-8200. Sincerely, Gordon Beardslee, General Planning Administrator Pinellas County Planning Department CC: Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Director of Planning, City of Clearwater OC L f'U NN rtL? i f, , I C, '. ? T IS W - r ?LOPMENT • FLOR A October 10, 2008 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Mr. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and DRI Processing Team Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: City of Clearwater 08-2ER; Proposed Amendment Review Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP or Department) has reviewed the above-referenced EAR-based amendments under the provisions of Chapter163, Part II, Florida Stahttes (F.S.), and Chapters 9J-5 and 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Department provides the following comment to assist your agency in developing the state's response to the proposed amendments. Comments - Coastal Element In numerous Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Coastal Element the term "Coastal Storm" area is used to replace Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) and Coastal Zone. The Department feels that a further explanation of Coastal Storm Area may be necessary to meet the requirements of Chapter 9J: 5, F.A.C. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If I may be of further assistance, please call me at (850) 245-2182. . Robin Branda Robin Brenda Environmental Specialist III Office of Intergovernmental Programs /rsb "1 i,,;•;• ('i•rn.•('lirut. i r.,? r'rr,;,'}? . M BOARD OF COUNTY CONIMISilIONERS Robert S. Stewart - Chairman Calvin D. Harris - Vice Chairman Ronnie E. Duncan Susan Lanala John Morroni Karen V,illiams Seel Kennet- T. Welch October 10, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2356 RE: Clearwater 08-2AR (EAR-based amendments) Dear Mr. Eubanks: Pinellas (ounty °'rP As part of the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)-Based Amendments Review Process, the Pinellas County Planning Department. as the County Land Planning Agency, has reviewed the referenced City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendment package. The review and recommendations are developed in accordance with the requirements of Section 163.3184(5), F.S. and Chapter 9J-11.010, F.A.C., and consider the effect and relationship of the proposed EAR-Based Amendments to the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. The County has the following recommendations and comments regarding the City's • proposed EAR-based amendments: e • It is recommended that the City add a policy to the Future Land Use Element indicating that they will implement the Metropolitan Planning Organization's livable communities model objectives and policies, as applicable to Goal A.6. and Objective A.6.8. • In the Capital Improvements Element, Policy 1.1.1.8. states that the 'City shall, in cooperation with Pinellas County as approved by voters in March 1997, maintain a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax for the purpose of supplementing PLEASE ADDRESS RPLY T0: 600 Cleveland Street Suite 750 Cleanvater, Florida 33755 Phone: (727; 464-8200 Fax: (727; 464-8201 Website: w%»v.pinellascounty.org Letter to Ray Eubanks Dated October 10, 2008 Page 2 current revenue sources in order to fund the capital improvements called for in this Plan'. It is recommended that the City update the statement to include the 2010-2020 tax extension that was approved by voters in March 2007. • Pinellas County appreciates the City's commitment to coordination with regard to levels of service, water supply planning and water conservation. • Pinellas County supports the City's intent to adopt the coastal storm area and related policies for managing coastal development. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment package, and if you have any questions regarding the findings above, please feel free to contact me at 464-8200. Sincerely, Gordon Beardslee, General Planning Administrator Pinellas County Planning Department CC: Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Director of Planning, City of Clearwater a FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S. Browning (?, G Secretary- of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES October 8, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Clearwater (08-2AR) Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Pinellas County) Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to this agency's responsibilities under Section 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document to determine if data regarding historic resources were given sufficient consideration in the request to amend the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. We reviewed proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report based text changes to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan to consider the potential effects of these actions on historic resources. Our cursory review indicates that historic resource concerns are addressed in the Future Land Use, Housing, and Coastal Management Elements. New Objective A.6.3 of the Future Land Use Element encourages historic overlay districts, the maintenance of existing historic properties and the preservation of neighborhoods by means of design guidelines and Development Codes. The implementing policies for this objective consider designation of historic properties, Board approval to changes in historic structures, surveys to identify and evaluate historic resources, the promotion of historic preservation, preservation of existing neighborhoods, and local designation of a National Register listed Historic District. Renumbered Policy C.1.6.8 of the Housing Element speaks of the protection and preservation of historically significant housing by means of the Community Development Code. The Coastal Management Element addresses historic resources in Objective E.1.4 by promoting historic preservation and possibly amending the Community Development Code to establish development and reuse standards for historic resources. 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 . http://www.flheritage.com O Director's Office O Archaeological Research ./ Historic preservation (850) 245-63W • FAX. 245-6 '16 (350) 24541-A • FAX: 245-6452 (850) 245-3,33 • FAX: 245-64337 Mr. Eubanks October 10, 2005 Page 2 A Wl-dle our cursory re%lew suggests that the proposed change may have no adverse effects on historic resources, it is the city's responsibility to ensure that the proposed revisions will not have an adverse effect on significant archaeological or historic resources in Clearwater. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 245-6333. Sincerely, Frederick P. Gaske, Director xc: Mr. Bernard Piawah CHARLIE CRIST GOVERNOR September 30, 2008 ?v Florida Department of Transportation 11201 N. McKinley Drive Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 OCT c 2008 STEPHANIE C. KOPELOCSOS --1J APECRETARY r RE: City of Clearwater Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 08-2AR Based on the Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report Dear Mr. Eubanks We have reviewed the City of Clearwater proposed comprehensive plan (the Plan) Amendment 08-2AR in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.); Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.); and our Plan review guidelines. The City proposes numerous amendments to the text and maps of the Plan. The transmittal represents a substantial amount of work and careful preparation. However, we are raising issues about policies regarding concurrency and roadway level of service, and the capital improvements element (CIE) as discussed in the objections and comments following the paragraph below. The City of Cleanwater The City covers 21+ square miles and extends from the Gulf of Mexico to Old Tampa Bay in central Pinellas County. It is the third largest City in the metropolitan area; it has 420 vacant acres (most parcels less than an acre in size). There are 3,700 acres of land are available for annexation within the Planning Area. The City population is approximately 110,000, which is projected to increase to 121,352 by the year 2020.. State roads within Clearwater include US 19, a strategic intermodal system (SIS) facility; Alternate US 19; SR 60/Gulf to Bay Boulevard; and SR 90/some segments of Drew Street and Coachman Road. The Transportation Element Rule 14-94, F.A.C. (Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards) was amended in 2006 to remove the definitions for backlogged roads and constrained roads, and to delete the "maintain" level of service (LOS) standard for State Roads (SR) that may have been designated backlogged or constrained. In light of this, Pinellas County adopted a Plan policy requiring the County to amend the Plan and County Code to remove the long term concurrency designation on US 19 and the interim LOS standard for US 19 (Rule 14-94 requires the LOS standard D) by April 1, 2009. Please note that some of the segments of US 19 that comprise the County long term concurrency management corridor also extend through the City. Please ensure Clearwater Plan consistency with Rule 14-94, F.A.C., and clearly state that the LOS standard on US 19 is "D." Please make the following revisions before adoption: c, Ray Eubanks September 30, 2008 Page Two Page B-6. Transportation Objective B 1.5 states: All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County i\-IPO. shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. We object to the amendment pending the removal of the reference to the State roadways (indicated above in bolded text) in Objective B.1.5. Page B-6, Policy B.l .5 .5 states: The City shall participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee to ensure that the level of service standard for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility tivill be consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. This policy is vague due to the use of the future tense regarding consistency with the LOS standard D. We object to the amendment pending revision of this policy to state that the LOS standard for US 19 is D, or that the LOS standard will be D no later than April 1, 2009. Page B-9, Transportation Objective B 2 3 lists projects in the Transportation Improvement Program and Work Program. We would include Florida Project Numbers (FPN) 2568811 and 2568812 (pp. 135-6, FDOT Adopted Work Program), reconstruct US 19 with frontage road (and Belleair Interchange and Seville Interchange) from North of Whitney Road to North of SR 60. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) does not include a five year Schedule of Capital Improvements as required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)5., F.S. The analysis (page I-1) states that a copy of the City Ordinance which updates the 6 year Capital Improvements Program is required to be transmitted annually to the Department of Community Affairs. The City needs to amend the CIE to be consistent with statutory requirements. It should be noted that the City relied on. 6 r' the plans of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to meet requirements for roadway facility planning and funding. The CIE does not set forth the LOS standards for facilities subject to concurrency (except for schools), which is required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S. We object to the amendment pending revisions to include all of the LOS standards in the CIE. Proposed Revised CIE Policy 1.1.3.3, subsection 3 on page I-8 is confusing and vague text regarding concurrency requirements for roads. This Policy and the other Policies referenced in the text do not appear to meet the requirements for roadway concurrency in Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S., transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation (2005statutory change). We object pending clarification. ` Proposed revised CIE Policy 1.1.3.5, Section 3(c)iii on page I-9, amend the Plan to modify the adopted LOS standard so as to reduce the required facility to equal the applicant's needs, would allow reduction of the required LOS standard on SIS, Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIRS) and Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) funded state roads. We object to Section 3(c)iii of this Policy 1.1.3.5 pending revision to exclude SIS, FIHS or TRIP funded facilities. Rav Eubanks September 30, 2008 Page Three The Future Land Use Element On page A-16, proposed revised FLUE Policy A.4.1.2 states: "For. the road links enumerated in the Transportation Element, a tiered level of service is established. The initial level of service established for the purpose of issuing development permits shall be increased after improvements are completed, consistent with the construction initiation dates. (Editorial)" The policy is vaQue• it does not refer to a list of the road links in the Transportation Element and we could not find clear policy guidance for a tiered level of service in the Transportation Element or the Capital Improvements Element. We object to the amendment pending clarification of the meaning of this policy and the tiered system. Comment: FLUE Policy A.2.2.1 (page A-9) states that the intensity standards in the land use categon- table are the maximum allowed except where otherwise permitted by special area plans or redevelopment plans approved by the City Council. We question whether development of a parcel that exceeds the intensity standard of the adopted future land use map category assigned to it is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Comment: FLUE Objective A.4.1 and Policy A 4. 1.1 refer to levels of service for traffic circulation. We recommend revision to refer to levels of service for roads (or roadway level of service). We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendment. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 813-975-6444, or send electronic mail to carul.COllins((rkdot.state t7 u5. Sincerely. Carol M. Collins Local Government Comprehensive Plan Coordinator cc: Kathleen Neill, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT Michael Delk, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater CHARLIE CRIST GOVERNOR September 30, 2008 11201 N. McKinley Drive Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS P E, VE 6 ?\J OCT 2 n ° I _.? fl PLANNI: DEVELOPMENT SER`./ICEE3 CLEARWATER - RE: City of Clearwater Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 08-2AR Based on the Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report Dear Mr. Eubanks We have reviewed the City of Clearwater proposed comprehensive plan (the Plan) Amendment 08-2AR in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.); Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.); and our Plan review guidelines. The City proposes numerous amendments to the text and maps of the Plan. The transmittal represents a substantial amount of work and careful preparation. However, we are raising issues about policies regarding concurrency and roadway level of service, and the capital improvements element (CIE) as discussed in the objections and comments following the paragraph below. The City of Clearwater The City covers 21+ square miles and extends from the Gulf of Mexico to Old Tampa Bay in central Pinellas County. It is the third largest City in the metropolitan area; it has 420 vacant acres (most parcels less than an acre in size). There are 3,700 acres of land are available for annexation within the Planning Area. The City population is approximately 110,000, which is projected to increase to 121,352 by the year 2020. State roads within Clearwater include US 19, a strategic intermodal system (SIS) facility; Alternate US 19; SR 60/Gulf to Bay Boulevard; and SR 90/some segments of Drew Street and Coachman Road. The Transportation Element Rule 14-94, F.A.C. (Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards) was amended in 2006 to remove the definitions for backlogged roads and constrained roads, and to delete the "maintain" level of service (LOS) standard for State Roads (SR) that may have been designated backlogged or constrained. In light of this, Pinellas County adopted a Plan policy requiring the County to amend the Plan and County Code to remove the long term concurrency designation on US 19 and the interim LOS standard for US 19 (Rule 14-94 requires the LOS standard D) by April 1, 2009. Please note that some of the segments of US 19 that comprise the County long term concurrency management corridor also extend through the City. Please ensure Clearwater Plan consistency with Rule 14-94, F.A.C., and clearly state that the LOS standard on US 19 is "D." Please make the following revisions before adoption: Florida Department of Transportation www. dot. state. fl. u s ® RECYCLED PAPER e Ray Eubanks September 30, 2008 Page Two Page B-6, Transportation Objective B 1.5 states: All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. We object to the amendment pending the removal of the reference to the State roadways (indicated above in bolded text) in Objective B.1.5. Page B-6, Policy B.1.5.5 states: The City shall participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee to ensure that the level of service standard for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal Svstem?SIS)-facility yv_ill-be_consistent with_EDOT's-LOS-designation-of D for this road. This policy is vague due to the use of the future tense regarding consistency with the LOS standard D. We object to the amendment pending revision of this policy to state that dhe LOS standard for US 19 is D, or that the LOS standard wili be D no later than April 1, 2009. Page B-9, Transportation Objective B.2.3 lists projects in the Transportation Improvement Program and Work Program. We would include Florida Project Numbers (FPN) 2568811 and 2568812 (pp. 135-6, FDOT Adopted Work Program), reconstruct US 19 with frontage road (and Belleair Interchange and Seville Interchange) from North of Whitney Road to North of SR 60. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) does not include a five year Schedule of Capital Improvements as required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)5., F.S. The analysis (page I-1) states that a copy of the City Ordinance which updates the 6 year Capital Improvements Program is required to be transmitted annually to the Department of Community.Affairs. The City needs to amend the CIE to be consistent with statutory requirements. It should be noted that the City relied on the plans of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to meet r equirements for roadway facility planning .and funding. L r The CIE does not set forth the LOS standards for facilities subject to concurrency (except for schools), which is required by Section, 163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S. We object to the amendment pending revisions to include all of the LOS standards in the CIE. Proposed Revised CIE Policy 1.1.3.3, subsection 3 on page I-8 is confusing and vague text regarding concurrency requirements for roads. This Policy and the other Policies referenced in the text do not appear to meet the requirements for roadway concurrency in Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S., transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation (2005statutory change).. We object pending clarification. Proposed revised CIE Policy I.1.3.5, Section 3(c)iii on page 1-9, amend the Plan to modify the adopted LOS standard so as to reduce the required facility to equal the applicant's needs, would allow reduction of the required LOS standard on SIS, Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIRS) and Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) funded state roads. We object to Section 3(c)iii of this Policy 1.1.3.5 pending revision to exclude SIS, FIHS or TRIP funded facilities. ry • • Ray Eubanks September 30, 2008 Page Three l The Future Land Use Element On page A-16, proposed revised FLUE Policy A.4.1.2 states: "For the road links enumerated in the Transportation Element, a tiered level of service is established. The initial level of service established for the purpose of issuing development permits shall be increased after improvements are completed, consistent with the construction initiation dates. (Editorial)" The policy is vague; it does not refer to a list of the road links in the Transportation Element and we could not find clear policy guidance for a tiered level of service in the Transportation Element or the Capital Improvements Element. We object to the _ amendment pending clarification of the meaning of thxs-polic- and_the tiered_sy-stem.-- ___ Comment: FLUE Policy A.2.2.1 (page A-9) states that the intensity standards in the land use category table are the maximum allowed except where otherwise permitted by special area plans or redevelopment plans approved by the City Council. We question whether development of a parcel that exceeds the intensity standard of the adopted future land use map category assigned to it is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Comment: FLUE Objective A.4.1 and Policy A 4. 1.1 refer to levels of service for-tr-af--c ciwAdation. We recommend revision to refer to levels of service for roads (or roadway level of service). We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendment. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 813-975-6444, or send electronic mail to carol.collins@dot.state.fl.us. Sincerely, Carol M. Collins Local Government Comprehensive Plan Coordinator cc: Kathleen Neill, Director of Policy Planning, FDO i Michael Delk, AICP,-Director of Planning, City of Clearwater ,. ? Sign Here ? Initial Here ? Notarize Here ? Retum-- ? I Post-it" signature request pad 7669 ^ ,/? 3 ? PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 • Clearwater, Florida 33755-41 Telephone 727.464.8250 • Fax 727.464.8212 • www.pinellasp September 26, 2008 F r-IN ocr ? aooe h ? ? _ °COUN Ms. Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater Municipal Services Building 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Review of Proposed Evaluation and Amendments to the Comprehensive Consistency with the Countywide Rules Dear Ms. Clayton: CIL MEMBERS E.f:I "Jlf' Mayor Bob Hackworth, Chairman ?. Mayor Beverley Billiris, Vice-Chairman ncil.org- Ci_ A',Vdt Vice-Mayor Jerry Knight, Secretary Commissioner' John Morroni, Treasurer Vice-Mayor Sandra L. Bradbury Vice-Mayor John Doran Mayor Pat Gerard Mayor Dick Holmes Council Member Jim Kennedy School Board Member Linda S. Lerner Mayor Mary H. Maloof Mayor Jim Ronecker Mayor Andy Steingold David P. Healey, AICP Executive Director Appraisal Report- (EAR-) based Plan (Ordinance No. 7993-08) for We are in receipt of a copy of the City's proposed EAR-based comprehensive plan • amendments, as referenced above. Pursuant to Division 3.3 of the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan (Countywide Rules), Council staff has reviewed the amendments for consistency with the Countywide Rules as follows: • The proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element should be revised to include the following policy: "All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards contained in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules including criteria and standards for nomenclature, continuum of plan classifications and categories, use and locational characteristics, map delineation, other standards, and special rules." The addition of this policy addresses the single comprehensive plan issue identified in the Consistency Report, as noted in item #5 of the Report. • The proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element Objective E.1.2 contain an amended definition of "Coastal High Hazard Area" which is consistent with the amended definition in the Florida Statutes, but technically inconsistent with the Countywide Rules; however, the Council staff anticipates proposing to amend the Countywide Rules to reflect the recently amended definition in the Florida Statutes. r? u PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY ,j1J71, i • w • • The remaining amendments to the comprehensive plan are either consistent with the Countywide Rules or are not governed by the consistency criteria of the Countywide Rules and therefore are not subject to the consistency provisions. Please be aware that the failure to properly identify any inconsistent provision in the submitted comprehensive plan elements during this administrative review period does not absolve the City of Clearwater from complying with the consistency requirement as set forth in the Countywide Rules, nor does it limit the Pinellas Planning Council from identifying inconsistent code provisions that may not be documented in this review. Thank you for transmitting these proposed comprehensive plan amendments for review. Please note that upon adoption, a copy of the final ordinance as adopted, and any subsequent codification thereof, must be filed with us. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 464-8250. Sincerely, Christopher M. Mettler • Program Planner cc: Councilmember John Doran, PPC Representative Michael Delk, Planning Director 9 Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:32 PM To: 'Donna.Harris@dca.state. fl.us' Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Donna, Thank you for your email. Please call me if you have any questions. Sandra Herman Planner III City of Clearwater, Florida 727-562-4586 sandra. herman(cDmvclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Donna. Harris@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Donna.Harris@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:26 PM To: Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us Cc: Herman, Sandra; Anita. Franklin@dca.state.fl.us Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Received CDs today 9/22/08. Donna Harris Office of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.922.1768 donna. harris@dca.state.fl. us • Page I of 4 The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Survey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/CustomerServiceSurvey/. Thank you in advance for letting us know what you think. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. Ray Eubanks/DCA/FLEOC 09/22/2008 08:32 AM To <Sandra.Herman@myClearwater.com> CC Donna Harris/DCA/FLEOC@fleoc Subject RE: Clearwater 08-2ARL ink 9/22/2008 E • Page 2 of 4 Sandra, Thanks for the e-mail. We will upload the new CD to Florida Papers upon receipt. Ray Eubanks Plan Review Administrator Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 850-922-1767 Ray. Eu ban ks@dca. state. fl. us The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Survey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/CustomerServiceSurvey/. We look forward to hearing from you. However, if you require assistance or a response from the agency, please use the "Contact Us" webpage at http://www.dca.state.fl.us/contactus/. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. <Sandra.Herman@myClearwater.com> To <Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us>, <Anita.Franklin@dca.state.fl.us> cc 09/1912008 03:52 PM Subject RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Ray, The applicable files have been reformatted to PDF. We went ahead and made 3 new cleaned up CD-ROMs to avoid any confusion - 2 copies of each for you - so the old cds should be discarded when you get the new ones - an attached letter will explain it. The Fed Ex package has been addressed to you - I will copy this email to Anita so she knows the package is heading to your office first. It should get to you on Monday. The revised cds have been sent to the other agencies also. Thank you. Sandra -----Original Message----- From: Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us [mailto: Ray. Euban ks@dca.state.fl. us] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:58 AM To: Herman, Sandra Cc: Porter, Catherine Subject: 'RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Sandra, Either one will be fine. Since Anita has spoken with you please go ahead and send them to her attention. Ray Eubanks 9/22/2008 Plan Review Administrator • Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 850-922-1767 Ray. Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us • Page 3 of 4 The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Survey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/CustomerServiceSurvey/. We look forward to hearing from you. However, if you require assistance or a response from the agency, please use the "Contact Us" webpage at http://www.dca. state.fl. us/contactus/. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. <Sa n dra.Herman@myClea rwater.com> 09116/2008 04:08 PM To cRay. Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us> CC cCatherine.Porter@MyC learwater.com> Subject RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Ray, Thank you and your staff for being so helpful with this matter. The d&a files that are in formats different than PDF format were previously prepared by consultants (copied to CD's). After I received the call from Anita Franklin today, we immediately started to work on getting these files converted to PDF (some are a little tricky to convert). We hope to have this ready to send the corrected CDROM's to you tomorrow or Thursday by Fed Ex. Should we send them to you or Anita? Please let me know if this will be acceptable. Again, thank you. Sandra E. Herman Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 PO Box 4748, 33758-4748 Telephone: (727) 562-4586 Fax: (727) 562-4865 sandra. herman(a-,)myclearwater. com -----Original Message----- From: Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us [mailto: Ray. Eubanks@dca.state.fl. us] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 2:42 PM To: Herman, Sandra 9/22/2008 Subject: Clearwater 08-2AR • Sandra, • Page 4 of 4 Just wanted to touch base with you about the City's most recent proposed transmittal (DCA# 08-2AR) package. The Department attempted to up load the CD ROM files and discovered that the files were not in PDF format as required under normal proposed submittal requirements outlined in Rule 9J-11.006(1), FAC. This was not a completeness issue for this amendment package since Section 163.32465, F.S. does not allow the Department to conduct completeness reviews on the proposed alternative review submissions. However, please be aware that the adopted submittal will under go a completeness review and all documents of the extra copies of the adopted amendment must be in PDF format (if the City elects to submit the extra copies on CD ROM) in order for the package to be determined complete prior to review being conducted. If possible it would be most appreciated if the Department could receive a copy of the proposed package in full PDF format in order to up load the entire proposed amendment to Florida Papers. If you have any questions please do not hesitate in contacting me. Ray Eubanks Plan Review Administrator Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 850-922-1767 Ray. Eubanks@dca.state.fl. us The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Survey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/CustomerServiceSurvey/. We look forward to hearing from you. However, if you require assistance or a response from the agency, please use the "Contact Us" webpage at hftp://www.dca.state.fl.us/contactus/. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. 9/22/2008 • 0 Page 1 of 1 Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:42 PM To: 'Donna.Harris@dca.state.fl.us' Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Donna, looked at Engineering's 2004 Water Pollution Control master plan book and apparently the file you identified below is a power point presentation about Progress Energy's "Premier Power Service" - referencing the other file called "Premier" provided in EAR Based Amendments AppendixC - Water Pollution Control Appendix I. Would you like for me to fax you this power point presentation? I am not finding the other file in our master plan book (the "191" file that won't open in Appendix C Chapter 2). This one is an apparent error on the consultant's cd. Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Donna.Harris@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Donna. Harris@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:39 PM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR I have another one D:WppendicesCDWppendixCWppendices\Appendix I - PGN Information\steveconway614042.pdf also Okb. Thanks Donna Harris Office of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.922.1768 donna. harris@d ca. state. fl. us The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Survey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/C ustomerServiceSurvey/. Thank you in advance for letting us know what you think. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. 9/22/2008 fie a 2??O tat File. Edit Vie. gr'.es Tools Help r Back --arch Folders A 1 _ JD Go . Files Currently on the CD ., file afid Eoidel 70!'K'-3 o, _s J Details ?_^, 3 191 i Adobe Hcr*hat Document j. attributes: stead-oiy i Date to t•ed; Thu-=clay. $ t??er 23r 2004, 5;15 PM 4c - .' 2613 Fig 2 . Fig 11 Fig 2.1 East Fig 2.2 East Fig 2.2 Fig 2.3 NE Fig 2.4 N" Fig. 2. Plant Plant ]Marshall Plant Pla.lt plant fig 2 IMMI _77 L4 114 .,. ? 2.3 mar: all street ma shall marsh?l marshal] marshali marshall northeast northeast northeast C•larshallP)... s,:ee ,Ian street street ->lc..... street-hyd-_ stree:•y,.. street-y... a .ttf-'=j... alwtf-pipir.g1 a ,,tf-piping2 . L a ' « nort -, not :east n-,; -s. nor leas: septic Layoutl a,,%,tf -p aing3 a df Opino4 &ivtf -p€... a,• tf -site-plat) (1) • 0 r ; • Clearwater • Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Donna Harris, DCA FAX: 850-488-3309 FROM: Sandra Herman DATE: September 22, 2008 TELEPHONE: 850-922-1768 TELEPHONE: 727-562-4586 SUBJECT: Power Point Presentation from the City's 2004 Water Pollution Control Final Report (Appendix I) MESSAGE: Donna, Here is the part of EAR Based D&A Appendix C that we discussed that was not opening on the CD. Please call me if you need additional information. Thank you. Sandy NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 7 ? - r.?s4??n-1.,.? 1,e_....?T?...?...._.,F.. ....... _....?...7?s7...._...::a........ ._........_ _ .. a.._. .. a .n, 4e ?a :-si:s ??rr..?n?? ,• .. S`C?.....':_'?: .d'?1e?`_???.rFns, ..__., N""?`x?T.,. ... .,-r.? !i? Design, permitting, installation, and maintenance. System start-up and commissioning by factory trained service technicians ® On-going preventive and remedial maintenance monthly on-rite inspections (option) annual PM Monitoring of site 24/365 (option) C Progress Energy 0 • '? r p ?"A y1% ?yMpy ?is? #.rn , dsrt+"i+d 'all t ` '++a ?'?8..?'" s` 4'?'3?? -vv'C cp?M43?. '?2"'` ._.. ..5 9., 7_ ., , te•... $.. 37?r F...?33• Sr? ?'1.u„ 1 ,k- Js,?.r.'.'?dku_ Ar. e7,1.Du• w..'J... y Existing Primary Proposed Standard Distribution Feeder Primary Transfer Switch Existing Primary Feed to Load (2 Loops, TXs, etc.) Proposed Standby Generator System ® Proposed System • Progress Energy Standard Interface • Optional Underground Installation Downstream of Generator • 2 MW Standby Power System - See Options Progress. n rV 97 W-1 -c 10-A ,.._:.:M.i'Yr?;s'.. ???'i?'^???:?m' • A! aw Features 4-. 500 kW Modules Single Enqine mss= Generator Redundancy YES NO Project Cost LOWER HIGHER Cost to Repair LOWER HIGHER Reliability with load shed MUCH HIGHER LOWER Expandability COST EFFECTIVE EXPENSIVE Progress nero ? '?. ?z,.?{?, {xe, u + i'3im ? P,i...r?!?'?.,.i?Xi..?:'3.?u` 0 Provides "N + 1 coverage" from a generator perspective More Cost Effective Installation ® Progress Energy has expertise with medium voltage systems Expandable power system to accommodate future load ? Cons Protected system has some exposure that would disable standby power system ® Consolidation of standby generators increases distance between generator and load ® May require N+1 redundancy on some critical systems C Progress Energy • °'r '?T? ttkY^?'S3.! ?3(y. . ?p 1.?'i?" ?w??`Tnvtezt?ya?t a ?? i l? g?. •f s"Y?i'ci s? of , r xc '?"$ ?w?cns?wmr+?wscsro?ez?sFa a?na V?:.:. -»... ,.~ ••?v.?'Yt. ?7Wit1. a?0.... ?? a`'k P ros ® Picks up all load on one system - "Simplifies site design" A { r ?+ nN o - I, Desic n Options Lease Replace Generators Nothin Do Multi- module $109180/mth. TBD Unknown Single Engine $13,038/mth. TBD Unknown • 0 I r ress r ??&? Work with City to determine cost's to do a Net Present Value Analysis ® Maintenance Labor cost's Determine Capital costs for replacement of existing generators Progress Energy C ??r ??? _ ,?'', a ' "?mv 7 • : ^h- ;, > a yY;s`"«f' `?" ,?5?: t s?'?r,< avr ? h d 2 "`&., ?,,, ? , r k ,r r Vin, u s ?` r,?f Srti z ""'7"`:-? .?A Page 1 of 2 `Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:22 PM To: 'Donna. Ha rris@dca. state. fl. us' Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR Donna, 1 looked in the master plan book - there are only figures 7.1-7.6 in Ch. 7. Please disregard the "scanned" files in figures folder of consultant's cd. Were you able to open up all the other files in that folder? Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Donna.Harris@dca.state.fl.us [mailto: Donna. Harris@dca.state.fl. us] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:24 PM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR did receive your fax. Thanks. I could not read the following three files D:\AppendicesCD\AppendixC\Figures\Chap 7\CL-SCAN1.pdf D: \Append icesC D\Append ixC\Fig u res\C hap 7\CL-SCAN2.pdf D: \Append icesC D\Append ixC\Fig u res\C hap 7\CL-SCAN3.pdf Thanks Donna Harris Office of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.922.1768 donna. harris@dca. state.fl. us The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Surrey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/CustomerServiceSurvey/. Thank you in advance for letting us know what you think. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. <Sandra.Hermanea myClearwater.com> To <Donna.Harris@dca.state.fl.us> cc 09/23/2008 10:42 AM Subject RE: Clearwater 08-2AR 9/23/2008 Page 2 of 2 Donna, Did you get my fax yesterday? All others opening ok? Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Donna.Harris@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Donna. Harris@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:39 PM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: RE: Clearwater 08-2AR I have another one D:\AppendicesCD\AppendixCWppendices\Appendix I - PGN Information\steveconway614042.pdf also Okb. Thanks Donna Harris Office of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.922.1768 donna. harris@dca.state.fl. us The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest levels of service and values your feedback. Please take a few moments to complete our Customer Service Survey by visiting http://www.dca.state.fl.us/C ustomerServiceSurvey/. Thank you in advance for letting us know what you think. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to lower the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http://www.FloridaDiscountDrugCard.com or call toll-free 1-866-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-763-9630. Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. 9/23/2008 From: Donna.HarrisZdca.state,fl.us Sent: Tue912312003 1:24PNI To: Herman, Sandra Cc: Subject: RE: C!earr titer 03-2AP I did receive your fax. Thanks. I could not read the following three files D'BAppendicesCD..A.ppeiidixCI,Figures^4Chap 7\CL-SCAbi1.pdf D:e Appendice sCD'AppendixCT igures %Chap 7tCL-SCAN2_pdf D ?AppendicesCD?AppendixC%f=igures"':Chap 7\CL-SCA.N3.pdf Thanks Donna Harris Office of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak 61,4 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-922.1788 donna.harris dca_state.fl.LIS 0 The Department of Community Affairs is committed to maintaining the highest le=refs of serlice and values your feedback. Please take a feytvi moments to complete our Customer SerAce Survey by visiting http ? ??;.dca.state.fl.us?Custon7erSeitiriceSur e =, Thank You in advance for letting us know what You think. The Florida Discount Drug Card is designed to to,aver the cost of prescriptions for certain Florida residents. To learn more, visit http. '.,?,,, lsFlorideDiscouittDrugCard.corn or call toll-free 1-966-341-8894 or TTY 1-866-163-9630, Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including email addresses, may be subject to disclosure. <Sandra.HermangmyCl,-ar+3rater.aom> 7 a «anc*a.l a i3a ,atat .fl, _s e Edit fieevv, Insert Fgrmat 'Tools Acrons tielp Adobe RDF ------ ---- - - C, ?a- POF Coml_ne ?X,Crt ' J Start me _:.'; ? SI ct; re ? f Sion ' 7 Review & Comment < ,J +nnm. d ? --b- could not open'stevecoti.??ay61-10-'t2.pof because it is either not a -ted file type or because the file has been damaged (for exam le, it vvas --t as an ema ! attachment and g:3asn t correctly, decoded). To create an Adobe PDr document, go to the source application. "then pant e-,e to Adobe PDF, 0?5 a ? CJ? i 337..1M"Jj ,:1! r 'c? E t ° . be --.'n ce'dl `a ex, _ 5,.. ,, as er,,a } To c- Cate c„ adobe PDF document, go to t3 source aaa •ca ;gin, Then P : t :e oa c;.; tv K, tube PDF, 7s ) ?O ?o Y2 7?1? -el CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLEAVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PI-INNING DEPARTMENT September 19, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 RE: CD ROM's related to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package - Based on the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Thank you for your email on this subject to Sandra Herman. Please discard the previous CD ROM's sent with this amendment package and replace them with the enclosed CD ROM's. The new CD RAM'S inrliiria some refnrmatterl ffleg qnd ffleg fnr rnlnred map S. AV,- have a1S.^ Sent the reused CD ROM's to agencies listed in the attached letter. If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman. Thank you for your help in this matter. Contact: Sandra E. Herman Planner III P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Telephone: 727-562-4586 Fax: 727-562-4865 sandra.herman@myclearwater.com Sincerely, bo ' Gina L. Clayton Assistant Director of Planning City of Clearwater September 19, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 2 of 3 September 19, 2008 Pinellas County Planning Department Attn: Brian Smith, AICP, Director 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Attn: Jessica White Lunsford, Principal Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Attn: Ray Mazur, AICP, Planning Director 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Attn: Ms. Susan Harp R.A. Gray Building G(Vl Q-+11 Rrnnnnnh Ctraat ?vv vvuu Liviiv usii vivvTallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Attn: Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Jim Quinn, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 • Clearwater RE: CD ROM's related to transmittal of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan EAR Based Amendment Package CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 To whom it may concern: Please discard the previous CD ROM's sent with this amendment package and replace them with the enclosed CD ROM's. The new CD ROM's include some reformatted files and files for colored maps. Enclosed is a copy of the letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. • September 19, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 3 of 3 s If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman, Planner III at 727-562-4586. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. incerely,, L Gina L. Clayton Assistant Director of Planning City of Clearwater Cc: David Healey, Pinellas Planning Council Tracy D. Suber, Educational Consultant Growth Management Liaison Office of Educational Facilities 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400 Telephone: 850-245-9312 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Sentemher 15. 2008 Govemor IUD Ms. Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Director City of Clearwater Planning Division Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Clayton: THOMAS G. PELHAM SecreWry CT TI 1 1000 PLANNIN',-, .:,-rARTMENT CITY OF C:LEARWAIR Thank you for submitting the City of Clearwater's proposed comprehensive plan amendments for our review. Our reference number for this amendment package is Clearwater 08-2AR. We have conducted an inventory of the remaining plan amendment package to verify the inclusion of all required materials for the remaining proposed amendments. The submission package appears to be complete, and your remaining proposed plan amendments will be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be asked to provide additional supporting documentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review. The Department's ORC report will be mailed to you on or about November 11, 2008. Also, please be advised that Section 163.3 1 84(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event no names, addresses are provided, please provide this information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. If you have any questions please contact Bernard Piawah, Regional Planning Administrator, that will be overseeing the review of the amendments, at (850) 487-4545. DRE/af Sincerely, D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) ? 850-921-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state.fl.us ? COMMUNITY PLANNING &50488-2356(P) 650-488-3309(f)* ? HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-488-7956(p) 850-922-6823(f)* J II STATE OF FLORIDA I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST September 15, 2008 THOMAS G. PELHAM Govemor Secretary I i1 Ms. Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Director City of Clearwater Planning Division Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 I Dear Ms. Clayton: The Department's records reflect that the City of Clearwater has submitted its second proposed comprehensive plan amendment submittal{ for the year 2008. The reference number for this package is DCA # 08-2AR. Pursuant to Section 163 3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006(1), Florida Administrative Code, local governing bodies shall consolidate all proposed plan amendments into a single submission for each of the two plan amendment adoption dates during the calendar year. Therefore, amendment package DCA # 08-2AR is the final submittal that the local government can submit for an amendment adopted during the calendar year 2008 unless the amendment meets the requirements of Section pursuant to Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006(1)(a)7, Florida Administrative Code. I If the City is intending to submit another proposed amendment submittal package for adoption in this calendar year, the City would withdraw the amendment package DCA# 08-2AR and combine it with the other proposed amendments and then transmit it to the Department pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006, Florida Administrative Code. I The Department looks forward to working with and assisting the City in resolving any issues identified in this procedural matter. If you require further assistance concerning this issue, please contact me or Anita Franklin, Senior Plan Processor, at (850) 488-4925 or Suncom 278-4925. Sincerely, I I D. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and Processing Administrator DRE/af I I 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) ? 850-921-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state.fl.us ? COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2356 (p) 850.4883309 (f) ? HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-488-7956(p) 850-922-5623(f)* I I • II • I ?O I w STATE OF FLORIDA I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS I "Dedicated to making CHARLIE CRIST Govemor I MEMORANDUM TO Jim Quinn, DEP 1 Florida a better place to call home" THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary Susan Harp, DOS Tracy Suber, DOE Carol Collins, FDOT7 Paula McCleery, Southwest Florida WMD Jessica White, Tampa Bay RPC Brian Smith, Pinellas County I I DATE: September 15, 2008 1 1 SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT I LOCAL GOVERNMENT/ DCA AMENDMENT Clearwater 08-2AR (EAR-based amendments) i DCA CONTACT PERSON/PHONE NUMBER: Bernard Piawah 850/4874545 II COMMENTS DUE TO DCA NO LATER THAN: October 12, 2008 Please contact the local government if you do not have a copy of the proposed amendment. Please review the propos'led comprehensive plan amendment documents for consistenc with applicable provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. Pursuant to FS 163.3184(4), forward objections, recommendations and comments to the'lattention of Ray Eubanks, Administrator, Plan Review and Processing, at the Department address indicated below. Please use the above referenced DCA AMENDMENT NUMBER on all correspondence related to this amendment. I Note: Review Agencies - The local government has indicated that they have mailed the proposed amendment directly to your agency. See attached transmittal letter. Be sure to contact the local government if you have, not received the amendment. Also, letter to the local government from DCA acknowledging receipt of amendment is attached. I I II 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) ? 850-9211-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state.f1.us ? COMMUNITY PLANNING 850488-2356(p) 8504883309 (f) • ? HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850488-7966(p) 850-922-5623(f)# I Ns a. / am fl f ITY 0F C L E A R W A T E R I POST 0T.-.Ce Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 4748 A! I ... 1MU"IMPAL SE 1•iCES BL1LDtVG, 100 SOUTIVIMftTLEAvENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3375(- '-???J ' T=_LEPI;c . (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 I PLANNING DEPARTMENT I September 9, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning c?c'ri Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100.;: I _ - RE: Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package - Based on the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 I Dear Mr. Eubanks: The City of Clearwater is submitting this transmittal as part of the requirements pursuant to 9J- 11.006 "Submittal Requirements for Proposed Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments". This is the City's transmittal of its plan amendment package for the Amendments Based on the City of Clearwater 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) pursuant to F.S. Sections 163.3177(6), 163.3184, 163 and 163.3191(10) (Note: the City has received two six-month extensions to expire on May 29, 2009) and we request that the Department review the proposed amendment package. I The City is transmitting one (1) proposed Plan Amendment with this letter for your review: • CPA2007-06003 - Plan Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance Number 7993-08 includes Exhibit A) I 9J-11.006(1)(a)l: The Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB), as the Local Planning Agency, held a public meeting on August 26, 2008 (rescheduled from August 19, 2008 due to Tropical Storm Fay) for CPA2607-06003. • The CDB recommended approval to the City Council. 9J-11.006(1 (a)2: The Clearwater City Council, as the local governing body, held a transmittal public hearing meeting on September 4, 2008 (rescheduled from August 21, 2008) for CPA2007-06003. I II i "F-:, F.Jn?-.c.- ,•:n A-,j -,. Arun, F-, nvro° a September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 2 of 5 • The City Council approved) the transmittal of CPA2007-06003 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. 1 The City received no requests for information and no objections from citizens at either the Local Planning Agency hearing or the transmittal hearing as shown by the enclosed Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information Lists. I The above proposed plan amendment package and one copy of each item specified under paragraphs 9J-11.006(1)(a), (b) and (c), FAC, were sent to the Pinellas County Planning Department, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, the Southwest Florida Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Education, the Florida Department of State and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, as identified in 9J-11.009(6) under separate cover on this date. 9J-11.006(1)(a)3: The followirig is the summary of the plan amendment package that the City of Clearwater requests the department to review: • CPA2007-06003 - Amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City 'of Clearwater as adopted on May 18, 2000, as amended, including amendments to the Table of Contents, and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements. of the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance Number 7993-08), based on the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) 9J-11.006(1)(a)4: The anticipated month of adoption for the plan amendment is December 2008., 9J-11.006 1)(a)5: The proposed plan amendment package does not pertain to an area of critical state concern. i I ` 9J-11.006 l)(a)6: The plan amendment package is not within Orange, Lake or Seminole Counties. I 9J-I1.006(1)(a)7: The proposed plan amendment package is not an exemption to the twice- a-year limitI of amendments, pursuant to Section 163.3191, F.S. (amendmentsl based on the EAR). I 9J-I 1.000)(a)7.h: With the adoption, any adopted amendments directly related to changes in ?._ the schedule in the capital improvements element pursuant to the adoption of the 2008/09 City of Clearwater Operating and Capital Improvements Budget scheduled for action on September 18, 2008, and as per Section 163.3187(1)(f), F.S. will be incorporated. i 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.t.: With the adoption, changes related to the adoption of Ordinance 7950- 08/DCA No. 08-RWSP 1 (incorporation of the Water Master Plan pursuant I i ' II September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 3 of 5 the regional water supply plan) that is scheduled for City Council action on September 18, 2008 will be incorporated. i i 9J-11.006(1)(a) 8. The adopted EAR was sent to applicable review agencies (see attached copy of the 2.006 letter sent to DCA with the list of review agencies that were sent the adopted EAR). i 9J-11.006(1)(a) 9: The plan amendment package will not be adopted under a joint planning agreement. i 9J-11.006(1)(a)10: Sandra E. Herman Planner III P.O.Box474,8 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Telephone: ! 727-562-4586 Fax: 727-562-4865 sandra.herman@mycleanvater.com If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman. Thank you for you help in this matter. i i Sincerely, n i Gina L. Clayton Assistant Director of Planning { City of Clearwater a I? September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 4of5 September 9, 2008 • Clearwater Pinellas County Planning Department Attn: Brian Smith, AICP, Director', 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Attn: Jessica White, Principal Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Attn: Ray Mazur, AICP, Planning Director 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 i Florida Department of State p t• i Bureau of Historic reserva ion Attn: Ms. Susan Harp R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Attn: Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Jim Quinn, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 RE: k?- Transmittal of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan EAR Based Amendment Package CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 To whom it may concern: Pursuant to Rule 9J-11.006(1) of the Florida Administrative Code, the City of Clearwater is submitting this proposed plan amendment package to the aforementioned organizations. September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 5 of 5 Also, enclosed is a copy of the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. If you need further assistance, please contact SandreH°erman, Planner III at 727-562-4586. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Sincerely, Gina L. Clayton Assistant Director ofPlanning City of Clearwater Cc: David Healey, Pinellas Planning Council Tracy D. Suber, Educational Consultant Growth Management Liaison Office of Educational Facilities 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400 Telephone: 850-245-9312 i k, i • of T"E _'?, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Eric J. Smith Commissioner of Education T. WILLARD FAIR, Chair-m Members DR. AKSHAY DFSAI t ust Read ROBERTO MARTINEZ j PHOEBERAULERSON KATHLEEN SHANAHAN LINDA K. TAYLOR September 11, 2008 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Re: City of Clearwater 08 2ER (EAR-Based Amendments) The City provided the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Department of Education for review and the package was received today. While the Department of Education has no substantive comments on the proposed amendment package, it does offer three comments that may facilitate continued close coordination with they Pinellas County School District and enhance educational facilities planning within the City. The comments are as follows: 1. The city's proposed FLUE aml ndments include revisions to policy A.4.1.1, which ensures the available of facilities and services concurrent with development. The policy would be improved by further revising it to include a reference to public school facilities. The city may wish to consider such a revision to ensure internal consistency with the Public Educational Facilities Element. 2. The city's proposed FLUE amendments include proposed new policy A.5.1.8, which commendably seeks to protect and enhance community assets. Because public schools are vital community infrastructure and a part of a community's character, the policy would be improved by recognizing public schools as community assets. 3. The city's proposed FLUE amendments include proposed new policy A.6.5.2, which relates to traffic calming. The policy would be improved with the addition of public schools and routes to schools as areas targeted foi traffic calming measures. SPESSARD BOATRIGHT OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 325 W. GAMES STREET • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0400 • (850) 245-0494 • www.fldoe.org • • Mr. Ray Eubanks September 11, 2008 Page 2 of 2 J11 4. The city's proposed ICE amendments include new policy H.1.1.1., which relates to disaster coordination. Often public school facilities are used as public hurricane shelters. If that is the case in Clearwater, the policy would be improved with the inclusion of the Pinellas County School District among the agencies targeted for the coordination effort. Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendment package. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, J76&- Tracy D. Suber Educational Consultant-Growth Management Liaison TDS/ Enclosure cc: Mr. Steve Fairchild, Pinellas County Schools Mr. Bernard Piawah, DCA Ms. Valerie Jenkins, DCA Ms. Sandra Herman, Clearwater Herman, Sandra • • Page 1 of 1 From: Suber, Tracy [Tracy.Suber@fldoe.org] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:58 PM To: Ray. Eubanks@dca.state.fl. us; Valerie. James@dca.state. fl.us-, bernard.piawah@dca.state.fl.us Cc: Sparkman, Lisa; Fairchild Steve; Herman, Sandra Subject: Clearwater 08-2ER Please see attached letter, which includes advisory comments I hope the city will consider. Tracy D. Suber Educational Consultant-Growth Management Liaison Office of Educational Facilities Florida Department of Education 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400 850-245-9312 tracy.suber@fldoe.= http ://www. fldoe.org;/e dfaciU Please take a few minutes to provide feedback on the quality of service you received from our staff. The Department of Education values your feedback as a customer. Commissioner of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith is committed to continuously assessing and improving the level and quality of services provided to you. Simply click on the link to the "DOE Customer Survey." Thank you in advance for completing the survey. DOE Customer Survey 9/16/2008 0 • PI Herman, Sandra From: Suber, Tracy [Tracy.Suber@fldoe.org] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:58 PM To: Ray. Eu ban ks@dca. state. fl. us; Valerie. James@dca.state. fl.us; bernard.piawah@dca.state.fl.us Cc: Sparkman, Lisa; Fairchild Steve; Herman, Sandra Subject: Clearwater 08-2ER Please see attached letter, which includes advisory comments I hope the city will consider. Tracy D. Suber Educational Consultant-Growth Management Liaison Office of Educational Facilities Florida Department of Education 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400 850-245-9312 tracy.suber@fldoe.org http://www.fldoe.org/edfacil/ Page 1 of 1 Please take a few minutes to provide feedback on the quality of service you received from our staff. The Department of Education values your feedback as a customer. Commissioner of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith is committed to continuously assessing and improving the level and quality of services provided to you. Simply click on the link to the "DOE Customer Survey." Thank you in advance for completing the survey. DOE Customer Survey 9/15/2008 of T"E _- FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION .? ?. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Eric J. Smith T. WILLARD FAIR, Chairman Commissioner of Education Members DR. AKSHAY DFSAI just Reva, ROBERTO MARTtNEz YlOYlftoQa! ? t7 PHOEBERAULERSON KATHLEEN SHANAHAN LINDA K. TAYLOR September 11, 2008 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Re: City of Clearwater 08-2ER (EAR-Based Amendments) The City provided the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Department of Education for review and the package was received today. While the Department of Education has no substantive comments on the proposed amendment package, it does offer three comments that may facilitate continued close coordination with the Pinellas County School District and enhance educational facilities planning within the City. The comments are as follows: 1. The city's proposed FLUE amendments include revisions to policy A.4.1.1, which ensures the available of facilities and services concurrent with development. The policy would be improved by further revising it to include a reference to public school facilities. The city may wish to consider such a revision to ensure internal consistency with the Public Educational Facilities Element. 2. The city's proposed FLUE amendments include proposed new policy A.5.1.8, which commendably seeks to protect and enhance community assets. Because public schools are vital community infrastructure and a part of a community's character, the policy would be improved by recognizing public schools as community assets. 3. The city's proposed FLUE amendments include proposed new policy A.6.5.2, which relates to traffic calming. The policy would be improved with the addition of public schools and routes to schools as areas targeted for traffic calming measures. SPESSARD BOATRIGHT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 325 W. GAINES STREET • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0400 • (850) 245-0494 • www.fldoe.org Mr. Ray Eubanks September 11, 2008 Page 2 of 2 4. The city's proposed ICE amendments include new policy H.1.1.1., which relates to disaster coordination. Often public school facilities are used as public hurricane shelters. If that is the case in Clearwater, the policy would be improved with the inclusion of the Pinellas County School District among the agencies targeted for the coordination effort. Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendment package. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, jTQ11_ Tracy D. Suber Educational Consultant-Growth Management Liaison TDS/ Enclosure cc: Mr. Steve Fairchild, Pinellas County Schools Mr. Bernard Piawah, DCA Ms. Valerie Jenkins, DCA Ms. Sandra Herman, Clearwater '4/I f ??LoF TyF+`e. °''CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER> FLORIDA 33758-4748 9? e?r; yj1?4eO?,? MUNICIPAL SERNRCEs BUILDING, 100 SovTH MvRTLEAvENUE, CLEARWATER, FLOIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 9, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 RE: Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package - Based on the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 Dear Mr. Eubanks: The City of Clearwater is submitting this transmittal as part of the requirements pursuant to 9J- 11.006 "Submittal Requirements for Proposed Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments". This is the City's transmittal of its plan amendment package for the Amendments Based on the City of Clearwater 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) pursuant to F.S. Sections 163.3177(6), 163.3184, 163.3187, and 163.3191(10) (Note: the City has received two six-month extensions to expire on May 29, 2009) and we request that the Department review the proposed amendment package. The City is transmitting one (1) proposed Plan Amendment with this letter for your review: • CPA2007-06003 - Plan Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance Number 7993-08 includes Exhibit A) 9J-11.006(1)(a )l: The Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB), as the Local Planning Agency, held a public meeting on August 26, 2008. (rescheduled from August 19, 2008 due to Tropical Storm Fay) for CPA2007-06003. • The CDB recommended approval to the City Council. 9J-11.006(1 (a)2: The Clearwater City Council, as the local governing body, held a transmittal public hearing meeting on September 4, 2008 (rescheduled from August 21, 2008) for CPA2007-06003. September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 2 of 5 • The City Council approved the transmittal of CPA2007-06003 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. The City received no requests for information and no objections from citizens at either the Local Planning Agency hearing or the transmittal hearing as shown by the enclosed Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information Lists. The above proposed plan amendment package and one copy of each item specified under paragraphs 9J-11.006(1)(a), (b) and (c), FAC, were sent to the Pinellas County Planning Department, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, the Southwest Florida Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Education, the Florida Department of State and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, as identified in 9J-11.009(6) under separate cover on this date. 9J-11.006(1)(a)3: The following is the summary of the plan amendment package that the City of Clearwater requests the department to review: • CPA2007-06003 - Amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater as adopted on May 18, 2000, as amended, including amendments to the Table of Contents, and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance Number 7993-08), based on the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). 9J-11.006(l (a)4: The anticipated month of adoption for the plan amendment is December 2008. 9J-11.006(1)(a)5: The proposed plan amendment package does not pertain to an area of critical state concern. 9J-11.006(1)(a)6: The plan amendment package is not within Orange, Lake or Seminole Counties. 9J-11.006(1)(a)7: The proposed plan amendment package is not an exemption to the twice- a-year limit of amendments, pursuant to Section 163.3191, F.S. (amendments based on the EAR). 9J-11.006(1 (a? )7.h: . With the adoption, any adopted amendments directly related to changes in the schedule in the capital improvements element pursuant to the adoption of the 2008/09 City of Clearwater Operating and Capital Improvements Budget scheduled for action on September 18, 2008, and as per Section 163.3187(1)(f), F.S. will be incorporated. 9J-11.006(1 (a)7.t.: With the adoption, changes related to the adoption of Ordinance 7950- 08/DCA No. 08-RWSP1 (incorporation of the Water Master Plan pursuant 0 9 September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 3 of 5 the regional water supply plan) that is scheduled for City Council action on September 18, 2008 will be incorporated. 9J-11.006(l,(a) 8. The adopted EAR was sent to applicable review agencies (see attached copy of the 2006 letter sent to DCA with the list of review agencies that were sent the adopted EAR). 9J-11.006(1)(a) 9: The plan amendment package will not be adopted under a joint planning agreement. 9J-I 1.006(1)(a)10: Sandra E. Herman Planner III P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Telephone: 727-562-4586 Fax: 727-562-4865 sandra.herman@myclearwater.com If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman. Thank you for you help in this matter. Sincerely, IN ` Gina L. Clayton V Assistant Director of Planning City of Clearwater • September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 4 of 5 September 9, 2008 Pinellas County Planning Department Attn: Brian Smith, AICP, Director 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Attn: Jessica White, Principal Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Attn: Ray Mazur, AICP, Planning Director 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Attn: Ms. Susan Harp R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Attn: Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Jim Quinn, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 • `Clearwater RE: Transmittal of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan EAR Based Amendment Package CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 To whom it may concern: Pursuant to Rule 9J-11.006(1) of the Florida Administrative Code, the City of Clearwater is submitting this proposed plan amendment package to the aforementioned organizations. • 11 September 9, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 5 of 5 Also, enclosed is a copy of the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman, Planner III at 727-562-4586. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Sincerely, Gina L. Clayton Assistant Director of Planning City of Clearwater Cc: David Healey, Pinellas Planning Council Tracy D. Suber, Educational Consultant Growth Management Liaison Office of Educational Facilities 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400 Telephone: 850-245-9312 CITY OT CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy OFri(e Box 4748, Cu-iAnwn:K, F oRMA 33758-4748 MONICIPAI. SP.RVICES BUILDING, 100 SOU11I MYRTu: AvI=.x(:r, CLEARWAlIiK, FLowl)A 33756 TELITHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIAN\NG DIiVHI.on41:N'I' Rrvn:W September 28, 2006 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re: Transmittal of Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report - 2006 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Pursuant to F.S. 163.3191(2)(p)(6) please find attached three copies of the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Additionally please find three copies of the legal advertisement of the adoption hearing and three copies of the action agenda of the adoption hearing. The Clearwater Community Development Board, acting as the City's Local Planning Agency, held a public hearing on the draft EAR on September 19, 2006 and recommended approval to the Clearwater City Council. The Evaluation and Appraisal Report was adopted by the City of Clearwater after a public hearing was conducted by City Council on September 21, 2006 pursuant to Resolution 06-49. Copies o is correspondence, the adopted Evaluation- an Appraisal Report, ana related attachments are being sent to the following agencies under separate cover on September 28, 2006: Pinellas County Planning Department; Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council; Southwest Florida Water Management District; Florida Department of State; Florida Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental Protection; Pinellas Planning Council; City of Belleair Beach; Town of Belleair; City of Safety Harbor; City of Largo; and City of Dunedin. 1:R\NK 1111MAIM. NIA)(); ?un? Dnlr:\x, Cry N( 11AIDIMN. I lui_(. I IA>(iCrON. (a)l'XCIIAIJIMMIK 0 • If you have any questions or need further information, please contact: Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4587 Fax: 727-562-4865 www. ing_ a cla)ton(a?myclearwater.com The report remains available for public review at our offices between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. and will soon be posted on the City's website. Please advise me regarding the completeness of this adoption package. Sincerely yours, Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director Attachments CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POSC OrriCr Box 4748, G.rARwA-r(ai, F(.oiw)A 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Souj-H MYrrn.r AVI?\I;li, CLEARWA7liR, Roil iDA 33756 Tla.(.P1 IoNr (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANCI: PLANNING Dr•.vrLOPnn:?r Rrvu:w September 28, 2006 Brian K. Smith, Planning Director Pinellas County Planning Department 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Richard H. Kephart, Senior Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Lori H. Belangia, Planner 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Frederick P. Gaske, Director R.A. Gray Ruilrlinb 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Fl 323-99-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Lindy McDowell, Environmental Manager Office of intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 City of Belleair Beach Reid Silverboard, City Manager 444 Causeway Boulevard Belleair Beach, FL 33786 FHAN: I IIIM1 NI 17, NIAMI, I(ii:N 1)(W'.\\• 011 ':(.u_wwrnr: II())-r I I:\\1117()\, (:ru nr.n_nt>nrr:r, ISn.?.Jr,?,r,?, ("OI M.11\101Hsi< (::\Ial.\ A. III: fr.H>PX. O)l MALVOMFI, .•1:r,i :u. I•:>u?u,?>,r:xr:?xl, i\rrn;>,:?rn`!:i\c rlr,? I:?u?LCnr:r" Town of Belleair 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Belleair, FL 33756 City of Safety Harbor Ron Rinzivillo 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 City of Largo Steven B. Stanton, City Manager 201 Highland Avenue Largo, FL 33779 John Lawrence, City Manager City of Dunedin Post Office Box 1348 Dunedin, FL 34697 • RE: Transmittal of 2006 Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City of Clearwater To whom it may concern: Pursuant to F.S. 163.3191(2)(p)(6), the City of Clearwater is transmitting one copy of its adopted 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the aforementioned agencies. This packet also includes the legal advertisement of the adoption hearing, a copy of the action agenda of the adoption hearing; and the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. If you need further assistance, please contact Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, at 727_562-4587. Sincerely, A. Michael L. Delk, AICP Director of Planning • s Herman, Sandra From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:56 AM To: Herman, Sandra Cc: Quillen, Michael; Chesney, Ed Subject: Comp Plan - Protection of Potable Wells Wellhead Protection Ordinance History In June 1991 the City adopted Ordinance No. 5095 requiring a Wellhead Protection Permit for any new or expanded commercial activity on a site where any property was within 200-feet of a potable well where the activity involves use, handling or storage of any contaminating material. In 2007 the Pinellas County Health Department requested that the City revise the wellhead protection ordinance to address residential activity. During the review of the City's ordinance versus Florida DEP requirements it was determined that significant differences existed. Therefore, a new ordinance was developed incorporating the requirements of Chapter 62 of the Florida Administrative Code. The new ordinance prohibits certain activities in the vicinity of potable wells depending upon degree of risk, requires a wellhead protection permit for new commercial activity within 500-feet of a well and requires a wellhead protection permit for any new residential construction within 100-feet of a well. Policy A.1.1.2 in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that "No development which has the potential to discharge toxic chemical may be permitted within 1000 feet of a City water well ..." During the review process the distance was changed from 1000 to 500 feet to be consistent with the ordinance. On July 30, the Citizens Advisory Committee objected to the change and voted to recommend the distance remain at 1000 feet. The committee stated that that they wanted the City to be more stringent than the state requirements. As this results in a higher level.of safety for wells, it is difficult to counter. Although the current ordinance is more stringent than the 1991 version, neither complies with the comprehensive plan. If the will is to have a 1000-foot restriction, the wellhead ordinance could be revised. D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 P.Icse? t T?Cou?cil PIN EL LAS COUNTY SCHOOLS Pre Jerk AUG ?008 August 6, 2008 er Aft m City Manager Clearwater City Hall, 3`d Floor ` 112 S. Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Dear City Manager, 0 Received AUG 0 8 M8 City Manager's Offlce The Florida Legislature enacted Section 163.31777 Florida Statutes (2002) (also known as S.B. 1906) requiring that the county and the non-exempt municipalities within that county enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the School Board to establish jointly the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the school district and local governments are coordinated. This latest Interlocal Agreement between the School Board and your City was Board approved on December 12, 2006. Please find attached for your review the Tentative Five-Year Facilities Work Program for 2008/089thru 2012/13. The Program is based on the Educational Plant Survey that was approved by the School Board on March 9th, 2004 and approved on May 5th, 2004 by the Department of Education Office of Educational Facilities. The School Board will be asked to adopt the Tentative Facilities Work Program at the September 9th Board Meeting (5:00 p.m.). The final Facilities Work Program will be included in the Capital Outlay budget that is to go to the Board for adoption at the Second Public Hearing scheduled for later that evening at 7:00 p.m. Both the Board Meeting and Public Hearing are to be held in the Conference Hall at the School Administration Building, 301 4th Street, SW, Largo. Please forward any comments and recommendations concerning the plan to my attention. I can be reached at 588-6172. Sincerely, Fred Matz, Assistant Superint ent Finance and Business Services Enclosure cc: Dr. Julie M. Janssen, Interim Superintendent Lansing K. Johansen, Chief Business Officer Steve Fairchild, Real Property/Facilities ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 301 Fourth St. SW P.O. Box 2942 Largo, FL 33779-2942 Ph. 17271588-6000 Fax 17271588-6202 SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairperson Nancy N. Bostock Vice Chairperson Peggy L. O'Shea Mary L. Tyus Brown Janet A. Clark Carol J. Cook Jane Gallucci Linda S. Lerner Interim Superintendent Julie M. Janssen, Ed.D. 7 2/"/0'2 4,A N. l The School Board of Pinellas County, Florida, prohibits any and all forms of discrimination and harassment based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, marital status, age, sexual orientation or disability in any of its programs, services or activities. ELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 'RODUCTION 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 5-Year District Facilities Work Program is a very important document. The Department of Education, Legislature, Governor's Office, Division of Community ning (growth management), local governments, and others use the work program information for various needs including funding, planning, and as the oritative source for school facilities related information. district's facilities work program must be a complete, balanced capital outlay plan that is financially feasible. The first year of the work program is the districts tal outlay budget. To determine if the work program is balanced and financially feasible, the "Net Available Revenue" minus the "Funded Projects Costs" ild sum to zero for "Remaining Funds". a "Remaining Funds" balance is zero, then the plan is both balanced and financially feasible. a "Remaining Funds" balance is negative, then the plan Is neither balanced nor feasible. 3 "Remaining Funds" balance is greater than zero, the plan may be feasible, but it is not balanced. rnmary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. 2008 - 2009 2009 - 2010 2010-2011 2011 -2012 2012 - 2013 Five Year Total Total Revenues $134,515,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,515,001 Total Project Costs $134,515,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,515,001 Difference (Remaining Funds) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 trict ,at Year Range :RTIFICATION PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT submitting this electronic document, we certify that all information provided in this 5-year district facilities work program is accurate, all capital outlay resources fully reported, and the expenditures planned represent a complete and balanced capital outlay plan for the district. The district Superintendent and Chief ancial.Officer have approved the information contained in this 5-year district facilities work program, and they have approved this submission and certify to the )artment of Education, Office of Educational Facilities, that the information contained herein is correct and accurate: We understand that any information tained in this 5-year district facilities work program is subject to audit by the Auditor General of the State of Florida. ;TRICT SUPERINTENDENT IEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ;TRICT POINT-OF-CONTACT PERSON B TITLE ONE NUMBER HAIL ADDRESS U ge 1 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Expenditures .Expenditure for Maintenance, Repair and Renovation from 2-Mills and PECO annualyl,prior to the adoption of the district school budget, each schooL boa[d_must-pr-epar_e_a teetativ_e_distr-ictJacilities w.ork.program-that.includes-a-schedule-of--- najor repair and renovation projects necessary to maintain the educational and ancillary facilities of the district, b . ` - ? x'00 21 N m -O. e? iVAC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. =looring $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. 3oofing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. Safety to Life $11500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 Locations: 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD), CYPRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY, DISSTON GIFTED PROGRAM, DIXIE M HOLLINS SENIOR HIGH, DOUG JAMERSON ELEMENTARY, DRUID COMPLEX, DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW), DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE, DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH, EAST LAKE SENIOR HIGH, EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY, ENTERPRISE VILLAGE, GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY , GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW), HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD), HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER, HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE; KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL, OAK GROVE MIDDLE, OAK PARK SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, THURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY :encing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 'age 2 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM IELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. 'king $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. ctrical $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. Alarm $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. ephone/Intercom System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. )sed Circuit Television $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Locations: No Locations for this expenditure. int - - - ---- - - - - - $1,800,000 - - ---$0 - $0 $0 - - - $0 $1,800,000 Locations: 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD), CYPRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY, DISSTON GIFTED PROGRAM, DIXIE M HOLLINS SENIOR HIGH, DOUG JAMERSON ELEMENTARY, DRUID COMPLEX, DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW), DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE, DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH, EAST LAKE SENIOR HIGH, EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY, ENTERPRISE VILLAGE, GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY, GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW); HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD); HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER; HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE, KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL, OAK GROVE MIDDLE, OAK PARK SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, THURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY 3intenance/Repair $49,852,339 $59,500,000 $59,500,000 $59,500,000 $59,500,000 $287,852,339 age 3 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT y f 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Locations: 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD), DRUID COMPLEX, DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW), DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE, DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH, EAST LAKE SENIOR HIGH, EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY, ENTERPRISE VILLAGE, GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY, GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW), HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD), HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER, HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE, KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NEW HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL, OAK GROVE MIDDLE, OAK PARK SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, THURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY SubTotal: 1 $53,152,339 $59,500,000 $59,500,0001 $59,500,0001 $59,500,0001 $291,152,3391 'ECO Maintenance Expenditures $6,197,266 $7,442,432 $9,960,629 $9,422,105 $9,389,218 $42,411,650 Two Mill Sub Total: $56,905;073 $60,042,568 $57,524,371 $58,062,895 $58,095,782 $290,630,689 ro =PA $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 'age 4 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • VELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU , ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD), CYPRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY, DISSTON GIFTED PROGRAM, DIXIE M HOLLINS SENIOR HIGH, DOUG JAMERSON-ELEMENTARY,-DRUID-COMPLEX DDUNEDIN-ELEMENTARY (NEW)-DUNEDIN-HIGHLAND-MIDDLE; DUNEDIN-SENIOR-- - -HIGH,-EAST L-AKE-SENIOR-HIGH; EISENHOWER-ELEMENT-ARY,ENTERPRISE-VILLAGE,-GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY, GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW), HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD), HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER, HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE, KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY,-NORWOOD SECONDARY-SCHOOL, OAK-GROVE MIDDLE, OAK-PARK-SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, THURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY I tyground Repairs $200,000 $01 $01 $01 $01 $200,0001 ige 5 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM t s PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Locations 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD), CYPRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY, DIS$1QN GIETED_P_ROGRAM,.DIXIE--M-HOL-L-INS SENIOR-HIGH DOUG- - JAMERSON-ELEMENTARY-DAUft5 COMPLEX, DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW), DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE, DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH, EAST LAKE SENIOR HIGH, EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY, ENTERPRISE VILLAGE, GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY, GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW), HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD), HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER, HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE, KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL, OAK GROVE MIDDLE, OAK PARK SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, THURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY frastructure $7,750,000 $7,985,000 $7,985,000 $7,985,000 $7,985,000 $39,690,000 3e 6 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM VELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Locations 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL JAMERSON ELEMENTARY, DRUID COMPLEX, DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW), DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE, DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH,-EAST LAKE SENIOR HIGH, EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY, ENTERPRISE VILLAGE, GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY, GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW), HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD), HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER, HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE, KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH- WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL-, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH; NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL, OAK GROVE MIDDLE, OAK PARK SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, T HURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, 'I OMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY rtable Rehab 1 $200,0001 $01 $01 $01 _ $01 $200,0001 ige 7 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 :1INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Locations 49TH STREET BUS COMPOUND, ANONA ELEMENTARY, AREA 1 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE, AZALEA ELEMENTARY, AZALEA MIDDLE, BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY, BAUDER ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT ELEMENTARY, BAY POINT MIDDLE, BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, BAYSIDE HIGH, BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY, BELCHER ELEMENTARY, BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY, BERNICE JOHNSON STUDENT SERVICES CENTER, BLANTON ELEMENTARY, BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH, BROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY, CALVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY, CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE, CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH, CLEVELAND BUS COMPOUND, COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH, CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY, CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY, CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ._..ELEMEN_T-ARY_(_OLD), CYP-BEST W_0-O.DS ELEMENTAR_Y-,_D.ISSTON__GIFTED_P_RO.GRAM,..DIXIE-M_H.OLLINS-SENIOR-HIGH,-DOUG---- -. JAMERSON ELEMENTARY, DRUID COMPLEX,. DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW), DUNEDIN.HIGHLAND MIDDLE,.DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH, EAST LAKE SENIOR HIGH, EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY, ENTERPRISE VILLAGE, GUS A. STAVROS INSTITUTE, EUCLID CENTER, FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY, FOREST LAKES ELEMENTARY, FRONTIER ELEMENTARY, FUGUITT ELEMENTARY, GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY, GIBBS SENIOR HIGH, GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY, GULFPORT ELEMENTARY, HAMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER, HARRIS TIPS CENTER, HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW), HIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD), HIGH POINT SERVICE CENTER, HIGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY, JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY, JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE, JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY, JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE, KENNEDY MIDDLE, KINGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY, LAKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY, LAKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY, LAKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH, LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, LARGO MIDDLE, LARGO SENIOR HIGH, LEALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY, LEALMAN BUS COMPOUND, LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE, LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY, LYNCH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY, MADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE, MARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY, MAXIMO ELEMENTARY, MCMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY, MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE, MELROSE ELEMENTARY, MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY, MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE, MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY, NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER, NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY, NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER), NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL, NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH, NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY, NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL, OAK GROVE MIDDLE, OAK PARK SCHOOL, OAKHURST ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY, OLDSMAR SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY, OSCEOLA MIDDLE, OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH, OZONA ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY, PALM HARBOR MIDDLE, PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH, PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR, PERKINS ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY, PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE, PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH, PINELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, PLUMB ELEMENTARY, PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY, RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL, RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY, RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY, RIVIERA MIDDLE, ROBINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER, SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY, SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE, SAFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, SAN JOSE ELEMENTARY, SANDY LANE ELEMENTARY, SAWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE ELEMENTARY, SEMINOLE MIDDLE, SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH, SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY, SHORE ACRES ELEMENTARY, SKYCREST ELEMENTARY, SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY, SOUTH WARD ELEMENTARY, SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY, SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, ST PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH, ST PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, STARKEY ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY, SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER, SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS BUS GARAGE, TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY, TARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE, TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH, THURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE, TITLE ONE CENTER, TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER, TYRONE ELEMENTARY, TYRONE MIDDLE, WALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY, WALTER POWNALL SERVICE CENTER, WESTGATE ELEMENTARY, WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY Total: $63,102,339 $67,485,000 $67,485,000 $67,485,000 $67,485,000 $333,042,339 _ocal Two Mill Expenditure For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation \nticipated expenditures expected from local funding sources over the years covered by the current work plan. s m t lemaining Maint and Repair from 2 Mills imrolm - $56,905,073 60,042,568 57,524,371 i $58,062,895 58,095,782 290,630,689 Aaintenance/Repair Salaries $2,671,500 $2,671,500 $2,671,500 $2,671,500 $2,671,500 $13,357,500 School Bus Purchases $5,729,273 $6,036,136 $6,319,425 $6,319,425 $6,319,425 $30,723,664 ether Vehicle Purchases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ;apital Outlay Equipment $27,146,515 $21,643,300 $21,755,300 $21,755,300 $21,755,300 $114,055,715 ient/Lease Payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ;OP Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 lent/Lease Relocatables $7,500,178 $2,700,179 $2,700,179 $2,700,179 $2,700,179 $18,300,894 _nvironmental Problems $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 'age 8 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM NELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 011.14 Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ecial Facilities Account $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 fety initiative $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $22,500,000 ntingency $4,040,782 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $24,040,782 tructional equipment transfer $7,000,000 $7 000,000 __$7,000000 _7,000 000 __ $7,000 000 $35,000,__00. e acquisition $900,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $8,900,000 -o Mill Relief $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $35,000,000 rry over $0 $17,212,300 $37,134,694 $57,726,501 $77,207,876 $189,281,371 trofit Portables to Permanent $12,075,426 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,075,426 Local Expenditure Totals: $135,4689747 $135,805,983 $153,605,469 $174,735,800 $194,250,062 $793,866,061 revenue Mill Revenue Source hedule of Estimated Capital Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included the tentative district facilities work program. All amounts are NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011.15 ins, etc. Districts cannot use 2-Mill funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenance/repair projects. (1011.71 (5), F.S.) Non-exempt property $78,516,066,700 $78,516,066,700 $78,516,066,700 $78,516,066,700 $78,516,066,700 $392,580,333,500 sessed valuation The Millege projected for 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 ;cretionary capital outlay per 011.71 Full value of the 2-Mill $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $652,664,805 ccretionary capital outlay per 011.71 Value of the portion of the 2- 370 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $652,664,805 Its ACTUALLY levied Difference of lines (3) and (4) $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 =CO Revenue. Source e figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance" will be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot used for new construction. :CO New Construction 340 $2,605,863 $0 $587,186 $1,795,123 $717,578 $5,705,750 :CO Maintenance Expenditures $6,197,266 $7,442,432 $9,960,629 $9,422,105 $9,389,218 $42,411,650 $8,803,129 $7,442,432 $10,547,815 $11,217,228 $10,106,796 $48,117,400 0 & DS Revenue Source ige 9 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM :)INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 3evenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 30 & DS Cash Flow-through 360 $669,162 $669,162 $669,162 $669,162 $669,162 $3,345,810 )istributed :O & DS Interest on 360 $103,860 $103,860 $103,860 $103,860 $103,860 $519,300 Jndistributed CO $773,022 $773,022 $773,022 $773,022 $773,022 $3,865,110 =air Share Revenue Source k1l legally binding commitments for proportionate fair-share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5-year district work program. nothing reported for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific information about any referendum for a 1-cent or 1/2-cent surtax referendum during the previous year. )id the school district hold a surtax referendum during the past fiscal year (2006 - 2007) ? No %dditional Revenue Source \ny additional revenue sources 1 11 9 'roceeds from a s.1011.14/15 F.S. Loans $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o )istrict Bonds - Voted local bond $o $o $0 $o $0 $0 eferendum proceeds per s.9, Art VII State Constitution 'roceeds from Special Act Bonds $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 stimated Revenue from CO & DS Bond $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 'ale 'roceeds from Voted Capital $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 mprovements millage ether Revenue for Other Capital Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 'roceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 authorized by school board 'roceeds from local governmental $o $0 $0 $o $0 $o ifrastructure sales surtax 'roceeds from Certificates of $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 'articipation (COP's) Sale ;lassrooms First Bond proceeds amount $o $0 $o $o $o $o authorized in FY 1997-98 ;lassrooms for Kids $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 )istrict Equity Recognition $o $o $o $0 $o $o 'age 10 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM NELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan feral Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 )portionate share mitigation (actual ,h revenue only, not in kind donations) $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 )act fees received $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 vate donations $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ants-from-local-governments-or-not-for- fit organizations --- - - -$o --- --- ---$0 ---- - -- -- $0 - -- ----$o - - ---------$0 --- - -----$0 crest, Including Profit On Investment $3,900,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $21,900,000 venue from Bonds pledging proceeds m 1 cent or 1/2 cent Sales Surtax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o nd Balance Carried Forward $132,171,902 $0 $17,212,300 $37,134,694 $57,726,501 $244,245,397 ligated Fund Balance Carried Forward $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ecial Facilities Account $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ie Cent - 1/2 Cent Sales Surtax Debt rvice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $136,071,902 $4,500,000 $21,712,300 $41,634,694 $62,226,501 $266,145,397 Dtal Revenue Summary cal Two Mill Discretionary Capital $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $130,532,961 $652,664,805 itlay Revenue :CO and 2 Mill Maint and Other 2 Mill ($135,468,747) ($135,805,983) ($153,605,469) ($174,735,800) ($194,250,062) ($793,866,061) Nci idnui cS I I _ I I I I :CO Maintenance Revenue $6,197,266 $7,442,432 $9,960,629 $9,422,105 $9,389,218 $42,411,650 callable 2 Mill for New Construction 1 ($4,935,786)1 ($5,273,022)1 ($23,072,508)1 ($44,202,839)1 ($63,717,101)1 ($141,201,256) ) & DS Revenue $773,022 $773,022 $773,022 $773,022 $773,022 $3,865,110 :CO New Construction Revenue $2,605,863 $0 $587,186 $1,795,123 $717,578 $5,705,750 her/Additional Revenue $136,071,902 $4,500,000 $21,712,300 $41,634,694 $62,226,501 $266,145,397 Total Additional Revenue $139,450,787 $5,273,022 $23,072,508 $44,202,839 $63,717,101 $275,716,257 Total Available Revenue $134 515 001 $U s $0 $0 $13, ? _ n f0, 4 515,001 'roject Schedules ige 11 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM r • 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan rapacity Project Schedules . schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs. ojeo yes s, Iew Replacement chool rr t BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH Planned Cost: 2' $2,114,999 $0 2 $0 0 $0 ;. $0 $2,114,999 Yes Student Stations: 2,501 0 0 0 0 2,501 Total Classrooms: 105 0 0 0 0 105 Gross Sq Ft: 275,989 0 0 0 0 275,989 )iscontinue use for ducational purposes BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH Planned Cost: $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 Yes Student Stations: -1,401 0 0 0 0 -1,401 Total Classrooms: -85 0 0 0 0 -85 Gross Sq Ft: -150,304 0 0 0 0 -150,304 additional lassrooms for class ize BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 116 0 0 0 0 116 Total Classrooms: 6 0 0 0 0 6 Gross Sq Ft: 7,217 0 0 0 0 7,217 kdditionai lassrooms for class ize PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 116 0 0 0 0 116 Total Classrooms: 6 0 0 0 0 6 Gross Sq Ft: 7,217 0 0 0 0 7,217 additional lassrooms for class ize SKYVIEW \ ELEMENTARY e Planned Cost: $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Yes Student Stations: 196 0 0 0 0 196 Total Classrooms: 10 0 0 0 0 10 Gross Sq Ft: 11,893 0 0 0 0 11,893 additional lassrooms for class size SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 116 0 0 0 0 116 Total Classrooms: 6 0 0 0 0 6 'age 12 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM r • NELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Gross Sq Ft: 7,394 0 0 0 0 7,394 Iditional issrooms for class :e BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 152 0 0 0 0 152 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,758 0 0 0 0 9,758 Iditional issrooms for class :e LYNCH ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $4,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 Yes Student Stations: 232 0 0 0 0 232 Total Classrooms: 12 0 0 0 0 12 Gross Sq Ft: 14,434 0 0 0 0 14,434 Iditional tssrooms for class :e PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 Yes Student Stations: 280 0 0 0 0 280 Total Classrooms: 14 0 0 0 0 14 Gross Sq Ft: 16,720 0 0 0 0 16,720 Iditional issrooms for class :e BELCHER ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 296 0 0 0 0 296 Total Classrooms: 16 0 0 0 0 16 Gross Sq Ft: 19,214 0 0 0 0 19,214 Iditional issrooms for class ,e f-EILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Yes Student Stations: 180 0 0 0 0 180 Total Classrooms: 10 0 0 0 0 10 Gross Sq Ft: 11,997 0 0 0 0 11,997 Iditional issrooms for class ,e SAFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 304 0 0 0 0 304 Total Classrooms: 16 0 0 0 0 16 Gross Sq Ft: 19,162 0 0 0 0 19,162 age 13 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Additional ;lassrooms for class size KYCREST ` ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 312 0 0 0 0 312 Total Classrooms: 16 0 0 0 0 16 Gross Sq Ft: 19,287 0 0 0 0 19,287 Additional :lassrooms for class size CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 152 0 0 0 0 152 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,908 0 0 0 0 9,908 Additional classrooms for class size SEMINOLE MIDDLE Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 176 0 0 0 0 176 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,441 0 0 0 0 9,441 Additional classrooms for class size PALM HARBOR MIDDLE Planned Cost: $4,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 Yes Student Stations: 264 0 0 0 0 264 Total Classrooms: 12 0 0 0 0 12 Gross Sq Ft: 14,073 0 0 0 0 14,073 Additional classrooms for class size MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 Yes Student Stations: 268 0 0 0 0 268 Total Classrooms: 12 0 0 0 0 12 Gross Sq Ft: 18,157 0 0 0 0 18,157 Additional classrooms for class size PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Yes Student Stations: 196 0 0 0 0 196 Total Classrooms: 10 0 0 0 0 10 Gross Sq Ft: 11,893 0 0 0 0 11,893 Additional classrooms for class size EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $3,200,000 Yes Page 14 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • NELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT r 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Student Stations: 152 0 0 0 0 152 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,581 0 0 0 0 9,581 Iditional issr oo ms for class :e ELLEAIR ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 304 0 0 0 0 304 Total Classrooms: 16 0 0 0 0 16 Gross Sq Ft: 19,162 0 0 0 0 19,162 Iditional issrooms for class :e BAY POINT MIDDLE Planned Cost: $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 132 0 0 0 0 132 Total Classrooms: 6 0 0 0 0 6 Gross Sq Ft: 7,215 0 0 0 0 7,215 Iditional issrooms for class ,e SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 176 0 0 0 0 176 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,441 0 0 0 0 9,441 ld't'or; l a issrooms for class 'e MCMULLE?. nnru -B i . i ELEMENTARY 7 i r?i.._.....+ Planned n ed Cost: ern nn .pc,4vv,vvv mn yv $v $0 $0 $2,4v"0,000 Yes Student Stations: 116 0 0 0 0 116 Total Classrooms: 6 0 0 0 0 6 Gross Sq Ft: 7,394 0 0 0 0 7,394 Iditional issrooms for class !e OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 156 0 0 0 0 156 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,555 0 0 0 0 9,555 Iditional issrooms for class !e FUGUITT ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 Yes Student Stations: 116 0 0 0 0 116 Total Classrooms: 6 0 0 0 0 6 Gross Sq Ft: 7,217 0 0 0 0 7,217 age 15 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Additional JAME classrooms for class size S SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Yes Student Stations: 80 0 0 0 0 80 Total Classrooms: 4 0 0 0 0 4 Gross Sq Ft: 4,853 0 0 0 0 4,853 4dditional AZALE ;lassrooms for class ;ize A ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 156 0 0 0 0 156 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,555 0 0 0 0 9,555 kdditional :lassrooms for class ;ize SEVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Yes Student Stations: 76 0 0 0 0 76 Total Classrooms: 4 0 0 0 0 4 Gross Sg Ft: 4,879 0 0 0 0 4,879 additional lassrooms for class ize FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Yes Student Stations: 44 0 0 0 0 44 Total Classrooms: 2 0 0 0 0 2 _ Gross Sg Ft: 2,489 0 0 0 0 2,489 dditional assrooms for class b.AKHURST ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Yes Student Stations: 188 0 0 0 0 188 Total Classrooms: 10 0 0 0 0 10 Gross Sq Ft: 12,122 0 0 0 0 12,122 dditionai assrooms for class ze STARKEY ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 164 0 0 0 0 164 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,680 0 0 0 0 9,680 iditional assrooms for class !e GULFPORT ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes ige 16 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Student Stations: 152 0 0 0 0 152 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,581 0 0 0 0 9,581 dditional assrooms for class ze BLANTON ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 160 0 0 0 0 160 Total Classrooms: 8 0 0 0 0 8 Gross Sq Ft: 9,706 0 0 0 0 9,706 Jditional assrooms for class ze JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE Planned Cost: $4,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 Yes Student Stations: 264 0 0 0 0 264 Total Classrooms: 12 0 0 0 0 12 Gross Sq Ft: 14,250 0 0 0 0 14,250 Jditional assrooms for class ze PALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH Planned Cost: $13,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,200,000 Yes Student Stations: 825 0 0 0 0 825 Total Classrooms: 33 0 0 0 0 33 Gross Sq Ft: 34,877 0 0 0 0 34,877 Jditlonal assrooms for class ze nivGECREST ELEMENTARY Pianned Cost: $0 ,su0,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Yes Student Stations: 80 0 0 0 0 80 Total Classrooms: 4 0 0 0 0 4 Gross Sq Ft: 4,853 0 0 0 0 4,853 entify district locatables Location not specified Planned Cost: $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 Yes Student Stations: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Classrooms: 43 0 0 0 0 43 Gross Sq Ft: 37,152 0 0 0 0 37,152 Planned Cost: $134,515,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,515,001 Student Stations: 7,797 0 0 0 0 7,797 Total Classrooms: 392 0 0 0 0 392 Gross Sq Ft: 557,012 0 0 0 0 557,012 age 17 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM El PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Other Project Schedules Major renovations, remodeling, and additions of capital outlay projects that do not add capacity to schools. Jothing reported for this section. Additional Project Schedules Any projects that are not identified in the last approved educational plant survey. Jothing reported for this section. Non Funded Growth Management Project Schedules Schedule indicating which projects, due to planned development, that CANNOT be funded from current revenues projected over the next five years. Jothing reported for this section. Page 18 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 'racking apacity Tracking e 0 ' M _ I VONA ELEMENTARY 387 387 397 21 19 103.00% f 0 0 361 93.00% 17 ?ALEA ELEMENTARY 719 719 582 39 15 81.00% 156 8 528 60.00% 11 ?ALEA MIDDLE 1,499 1,349 1,128 63 18 84.00% 0 0 1,024 76.00% 16 4RDMOOR 647 647 646 19 34 100.00% 116 6 586 77.00% 23 _EMENTARY %RGO MIDDLE 1,123 11011 1,100 49 22 109.00% 0 0 997 99.00% 20 4UDER ELEMENTARY 754 754 753 15 50 100.00% 0 0 683 91.00% 46 4Y POINT 771 771 699 41 17 91.00% 0 0 634 82.00% 15 _EMENTARY AY POINT MIDDLE 1,408 1,267 1,120 60 19 88.00% 119 6 1,015 73.00% 15 AY VISTA 619 619 605 33 18 98.00% 152 8 549 71.00% 13 JNDAMENTAL LEMENTARY- EAR CREEK 576 576 543 31 18 94.00% 0 0 492 85.00% 16 LEMENTARY ELCHER ELEMENTARY 701 701 636 36 18 91.00% 296 16 576 58.00% 11 ELLEAIR ELEMENTARY 673 673 533 36 15 79.00% 304 16 483 49.00% 9 LANTON ELEMENTARY 710 710 616 39 16 87.00% 160 8 559 64.00% 12 OCA CIEGA SENIOR 2,025 1,924 1,930 81 24 100.00% 0 0 1,751 91.00% 22 IGH AMPBELL PARK 638 638 582 35 17 91.00% 0 0 528 83.00% 15 LEMENTARY JSEPH L CARWISE 1,475 1,328 1,274 62 21 96.00% 0 0 1,155 87.00% 19 IDDLE LEARVIEW AVENUE 468 468 426 24 18 91.00% 0 0 386 82.00% 16 LEMENTARY AUL B STEPHENS 307 307 220 30 7 72.001% 0 0 200 65.00% 7 XCEPTIONAL TUDENT EDUCATION TR LEARWATER SENIOR 2,323 2,207 2,014 94 21 91.00% 0 0 1,827 83.00% 19 IGH OUNTRYSIDE SENIOR 2,613 2,482 2,269 110 21 91.00% 0 0 2,058 83.00% 19 IGH ROSS BAYOU 804 804 551 43 13 69.00% 0 0 500 62.00% 12 LEMENTARY URLEW CREEK 659 659 629 34 19 95.00% 1 152 8 570 70.00% 14 LEMENTARY age 19 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM :)INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 3OBINSON SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 )ERVICE CENTER ASSTON GIFTED 30 30 4 3 1 13.00% 0 0 4 13.00% 1 )ROGRAM -IAMILTON DISSTON S E 299 299 165 29 6 55.00% 0 0 149 50.00% 5 CENTER LA DAVIS EII 835 835 721 27 27 86.00% 180 10 654 64 00% 18 ? -__EMENTARY . AXIE M HOLLINS 2,285 2,171 1,738 96 18 80.00% 0 0 1,576 73.00% 16 SENIOR HIGH ,URTIS FUNDAMENTAL 609 609 0 31 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 it DUNEDIN LEMENTARY )UNEDIN SENIOR HIGH 1,843 1,751 1,878 75 25 107.00% 0 0 1,703 97.00% 23 )UNEDIN HIGHLAND 1,482 1,334 1,049 64 16 79.00% 0 0 952 71.00% 15 RIDDLE ISENHOWER 792 792 697 43 16 88.00% 152 8 632 67.00% 12 LEMENTARY =AIRMOUNT PARK 723 723 591 39 15 82.00% 44 2 536 70.00% 13 LEMENTARY JOHN M SEXTON 880 880 726 46 16 82.00% 0 0 658 75.00% 14 LEMENTARY v1ORGAN FITZGERALD 1,662 1,496 1,140 69 17 76.00% 0 0 1,033 69.00% 15 AIDDLE -UGUITT ELEMENTARY 757 757 603 40 15 80.00% 116 6 547 63.00% 12 -YNCH ELEMENTARY 791 791 588 40 15 74.00% 232 12 533 52.00% 10 'ERKINS ELEMENTARY 731 731 552 38 15 76.00% 0 0 500 68.00% 13 3ARRISON-JONES 678 678 683 37 18 101.00% 0 0 619 91.00% 17 LEMENTARY 31BBS SENIOR HIGH 2,451 2,328 2,018 98 21 87.00% 0 0 1,829 79.00% 19 3ULF BEACHES 428 428 346 22 16 81.00% 0 0 314 73.00% 14 _LEMENTARY 3ULFPORT 579 579 483 31 16 83.00% 152 8 438 60.00% 11 LEMENTARY 1ARRIS TIPS CENTER 22 22 80 1 80 361.00% 0 0 72 327.00% 72 HGHLAND LAKES 641 641 654 34 19 102.00% 0 0 593 93.00% 1 17 LEMENTARY CALVIN HUNSINGER 294 294 159 29 5 54.00% 0 0 144 49.00% 5 XCEPTIONAL iTUDENT EDUCATION 'TR iIGH POINT 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 LEMENTARY (OLD) <ENNEDY MJDD -E' 1 986 887 613 43 14 69.00% 0 0 555 63.00% 13 6NGS HIGHWAY, 555 555 394 27 15 71.00% 0 0 357 64.00% 13 L? MENTARY -' _AKEVIEW 384 384 326 16 20 85.00% 0 0 296 77.00% 19 -UNDAMENTAL LEMENTARY -AKEWOOD 651 651 517 35 15 79.00% 0 0 468 72.00% 13 LEMENTARY _AKEWOOD SENIOR 1,904 1,809 1,602 77 21 89.00% 0 0 1,453 80.00% 19 1IGH 'age 20 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan %RG0 CENTRAL 497 497 407 24 17 82.00% 0 0 369 74.00% 15 _EMENTARY %RGO SENIOR HIGH 2,420 2,299 2,046 101 20 89.00% 0 0 1,855 81.00% 18 =ALMAN AVENUE 631 631 471 33 14 75.00% 0 0 427 68.00% 13 _EMENTARY 4FETY HARBOR 170 170 0 10 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 CONDARY SCHOOL ADEIRA BEACH 509 509 432 27 16 85.00% 0 0 392 77.00% 15 _EMENTARY ADEIRA BEACH 1,284 1,156 1,078 56 19 93.00% 0 0 977 85.00% 17 IDDLE AXIMO ELEMENTARY 719 719 634 39 16 88.00% 0 0 575 80.00% 15 EADOWLAWN MIDDLE 1,358 1,222 1,034 58 18 85.00% 0 0 937 77.00% 16 ELROSE 552 552 431 28 15 78.00% 0 0 391 71.00% 14 _EMENTARY ILDRED HELMS 726 726 641 39 16 88.00% 232 12 581 61.00% 11 _EMENTARY )MUNSON ADULT 402 603 0 23 0 .0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 ARNING CENTER OUNT VERNON 517 517 461 28 16 89.00% 0 0 418 81.00% 15 _EMENTARY INA HARRIS 409 409 238 37 6 58.00% 0 0 216 53.00% 6 {CEPTIONAL rUDENT EDUCATION ENTER DRTHEAST SENIOR 2,033 1,931 2,020 82 25 105.00% 0 0 1,831 95.00% 22 'GH DRTH SHORE 466 466 451 25 18 97.00% 0 0 409 88.00% - 16 _EMENTARY DRTH WARD 18 18 300 1 300 1,665.00% 0 0 272 1,511.00 % • 272 EMENTARY ;LEARWATER) JRTH WARD 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1 0 0 0 0.00% 0 CONDARY SCHOOL )RTHWEST 721 721 671 38 18 93.00% 0 0 608 84.00% 16 _EMENTARY JRWOOD 42 42 58 2 29 137.00% 0 0 52 124.00% 26 _CONDARY SCHOOL A GROVE MIDDLE 1,263 1,137 984 53 19 87.00% 0 0 892 78.00% 17 4KHURST 751 751 683 37 18 91.00 % 188 10 620 66.00% 13 _EMENTARY• _DSMAR 579 579 595 31 19 103.00%1 156 8 540 73.00% 14 _EMENTARY RANGE GROVE 349 349 379 19 20 109.00%1 0 0 344 99.00% 18 _EMENTARY 3CEOLA SENIOR HIGH 2,024 1,923 1,520 82 19 79.00% 0 0 1,378 72.00% 17 3CEOLA MIDDLE 11356 1,220 1,150 58 20 94.00% 0 0 1,042 85.00% 18 ?ONA ELEMENTARY 705 705 701 38 18 99.00% 0 0 635 90.00% 17 -IRTIS FUNDAMENTA 436 .436 404 22 18 93.00%1 0 0 366 84.00% 17 _EMENTARY (OLD) \LM FMRBOR-- 430 430 389 23 17 91.00% 280 14 353 50.00% 10 .EMENTARY \LM HARBOR MIDDLE 1,601 1,441 1,355 67 20 94.00% 238 12 1,229 73.00% 16 xge 21 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM IINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 11CHARD L SANDERS 343 343 142 33 4 41.00% 0 0 129 38.00% 4 ;CHOOL 1ASADENA 412 412 462 22 21 112.00% 0 0 419 102.00% 19 FUNDAMENTAL EL TARY ;LEARWATER 694 625 382 31 12 61.00% 0 0 346 55.00% 11 TERMEDIATE 'INEL-LAS CENTRAL---- ..-692 -- -- --692 - --640 --- ----38 - 17 ---93:00% --116 -- -6 -- 581- - 72-00% -----13 :LEMENTARY >EMINOLE 227 227 116 14 8 51.00% 0 0 105 46.00% 8 /OCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER IINELLAS PARK 717 717 652 36 18 91.00% 0 0 591 82.00% 16 ELEMENTARY IINELLAS PARK MIDDLE 1,318 1,186 987 56 18 83.00% 0 0 895 75.00% 16 IINELLAS PARK 2,250 2,138 2,179 97 22 102.00% 0 0 1,976 92.00% 20 i IGH 'LUMB ELEMENTARY 828 828 767 45 17 93.00% 0 0 695 84.00% 15 'ONCE DE LEON 721 721 653 38 17 91.00% 196 10 592 65.00% 12 ELEMENTARY 31DGECREST 683 683 695 37 19 102.00% 80 4 630 83,00% 15 ELEMENTARY 310 VISTA 444 444 382 24 16 86.00% 0 0 346 78.00% 14 ELEMENTARY 31VIERA MIDDLE 1,298 1,168 764 54 14 65.00% 0 0 693 59.00% 13 SAFETY HARBOR 696 696 653 38 17 94.00% 304 16 592 59.00.% 11 ELEMENTARY SAFETY HARBOR 1,563 1,407 1,328 65 20 94.000 158 8 1,204 77.00% 16 ADDLE 3AWGRASS LAKE 713 713 600 38 16 84.00% 0 0 544 76.00% 14 LEMENTARY 3T PETERSBURG 2,105 2,000 2,163 102 21 108.00% 0 0 1,961 98.00% 19 SENIOR HIGH 3T PETERSBURG' 1,443 1,732 75 68 1 4.00% 0 0 68 4.00% 1 ?OCATIONAL- FECHNICAL INSTITUTE 3AN JOSE 645 645 460 34 14 71.00% 0 0 417 65.00% 12 LEMENTARY iANDY LANE 581 581 445 32 14 77.00% 0 0 404 70.00% 13 = EMENTARY 3EMINOLE 715 715 695 30 23 97.00% 0 0 630 88,00% 21 LEMENTARY 3EMINOLE SENIOR 2,436 2,314 2,030 95 21 88.00% 0 0 1,841 80.00% 19 11GH 3EMINOLE MIDDLE 1,334 1,201 1,146 59 19 95.00% 158 8 1,039 76.00% 16 3EVENTY-FOURTH 678 678 589 37 16 87.00% 76 4 534 71.00% 13 STREET ELEMENTARY SHORE ACRES 673 673 637 36 18 95.00% 0 0 578 86.00% 16 LEMENTARY JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE 1,465 1,319 1,216 61 20 92.00% 238 12 1,103 71.00% 15 SKYCREST 647 .647 630 36 17 97.00% 312 16 571 60.00% 11 = MENTARY 3KYVIEW ELEMENTARY 665 665 591 35 17 89.00% 196 10 536 62.00% 12 SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMEN 22 20 613 1 613 3,062.00% 0 0 555 2,775.00 % 555 Page 22 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Z(JtHWARD 18 18 262 1 262 1,454.00% 0 0 237 1,317.00% 237 EMENTARY -MMY TA MENTARY 679 679 649 37 18 96.00% 164 8 588 70.00% 13 IARJORIE KINNAN 668 668 679 36 19 102.00% 0 0 615 92.00% 17 AWLINGS LEMENTARY UNSET HILLS SERVICE - 0 - 0 0 -- --- 0 --- 0 -- 0.00% _ 0 0 -0. ENTER ARPON SPRINGS 731 731 450 39 12 62.00% 72 0 408 51.00% 10 LEMENTARY ARPON SPRINGS 1,941 1,844 1,898 80 24 103.00% 0 0 1,721 93.00% 22 ENIOR HIGH INELLAS VOCATIONAL- 925 1,110 90 57 2 8.00% 1 0 0 82 7.00% 1 ECHNICAL INSTITUTE ARPON SPRINGS 1,253 1,128 1,208 55 22 107.00% 0 0 1,095 97.00% 20 IIDDLE YRONE ELEMENTARY 938 938 647 48 13 69.00% 0 0 586 62.00% 12 YRONE MIDDLE 1,132 1,019 887 50 18 87.00% 0 0 804 79.00% 16 ARPON SPRINGS 254 254 259 13 20 102.00% 0 0 234 92.00% 18 UNDAMENTAL LEMENTARY /ALSINGHAM 677 677 678 26 26 100.00% 1 0 0 615 91.00% 24 LEMENTARY /ESTGATE 742 .742 684 39 18 92.00% 1 0 0 620 84.00% 16 LEMENTARY /OODLAWN 684 684 523 36 15 76.00% 0 0 475 69.00% 13 LEMENTARY AST LAKE SENIOR 2,176 2,067 2,215 92 24 107.00% 0 0 2,009 97.00% 22 IGH 1 OUTHERN OAK 590 590 599 31 19 102.00% 116 6 543 77.00% 1 15 LEMENTARY YPRESS WOODS 799 799 712 43 17 89.00%1 0 0 646 81.00% 15 LEMENTARY UTHERLAND 623 623 588 33 18 94.00% 0 0 533 86.00% 16 LEMENTARY 4KE SAINT GEORGE 687 687 601 37 16 87.00% 0 0 545 79.00% 15 LEMENTARY RUID COMPLEX 7y 258 258 129 14 9 50.00% 0 0 117 45.00% 8 ICMULLEN-BOOTH 765 765 713 40 18 93.00% 116 6 646 73.00% 14 LEMENTARY Y . ALM HARBOR 1,875 1,781 2,183 76 29 123,00% 784 33 1,980 77.00% 18 NIVERSITY SENIOR IGH ROOKER CREEK 641 641 610 34 18 95.00% 0 0 553 86.00% 16 LEMENTARY RONTIER 777 777 726 42 17 93.00% 0 0 658 85.00 % 16 L ARY OACHMAN 627 564 557 27 21 99.00% 0 0 505 90.00% 19 UNDAMENTAL MIDDL CREST LAKES 802 802 725 44 16 90.00% 0 0 657 82.00% 15 LEMENTARY OUG JAMERSON 619 619 593 33 18 96.00% 0 0 538 87.00% 16 LEMENTARY aMES SANDERLIN 579 579 519 31 17 90.00% 80 4 470 71.00% 13 LEMENTARY 1 age 23 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM :)INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT f HURGOOD MARSHALL =UNDAMENTAL MIDDLE SUNSET HILLS LEMENTARY 3AYSIDE HIGH DAK PARK SCHOOL _EALMAN NTERMEDIATE -fIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW) DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY NEW) VEW HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. The COFTE Projected Total (93,960) for 2012 - 2013 must match the Official Forecasted COFTE Total '93,959 ) for 2012 - 2013 before this section can be completed. In the event that the COFTE Projected Total does not match the Official forecasted COFTE, then the Balanced Projected COFTE Table Should be used to balance COFTE. ® s 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 1,038 934 623 45 14 67.00% 0 0 565 60.00% 13 597 597 622 32 19 104.00% 0 0 564 94.00% 18 759 607 329 32 10 54.00% 0 0 299 49.00% 9 679 611 304 28 11 50.00% 0 0 275 45.00% 10 579 521 397 25 16 76.00% 0 0 360 69.00% 14 754 0 586 43 14 0.00% 0 0 532 0.00% 12 778 0 578 44 13 0.00% 0 0 524 0.00% 12 80 0 0 4 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 122,891 117,119 103,620 5,805 18 88.47% 1 6,591 329 93,960 75.95% 1 15 Relocatable Replacement Number of relocatable classrooms clearly identified and scheduled for replacement in the school board adopted financially feasible 5-year district work program. LARGO MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 9 9 BAY POINT ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 3 3 BAY POINT MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 4 4 BELCHER ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 11 11 BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 6 6 BLANTON ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 4 4 COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 6 6 CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 7 7 EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 4 4 LYNCH ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 10 10 20 Page 24 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan \RRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 2 2 JLF BEACHES ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 1 1 ,KEWOOD ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 2 2 ,KEWOOD SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 3 3 ,RGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 p 4 . ,RGO SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 5 5 kFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL 0 0" 0 0 14 14 %DEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 6 .6 aXIMO ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 4 4 LDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 7 7 \KHURST ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 7 7 3CEOLA SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 4 4 kLM HARBOR ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 10 9 19 kLM HARBOR MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 12 12 NELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 3 3 )NCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 7 7 O VISTA ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 4 4 VIERA MIDDLE 0 0 4 0 4 8 kFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 14 14 28 'PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 R R ?N JOSE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 1 1 'MINOLE MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 3 3 )HN HOPKINS MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 12 12 :YCREST ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 9 9 'ARKEY ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 3 3 'RONE ELEMENTARY 0 3 0 0 0 3 'BONE MIDDLE 0 0 15 0 0 15 STGATE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 3 3 )UTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 1 1 'PRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 3 3 ;MULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 5 5 ,LM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 33 33 LOOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 3 3 )REST LAKES ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 4 4 Total Relocatable Replacements: 0 3 19 34 262 318 .ge 25 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM :)INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT "harter Schools Tracking nformation regarding the use of charter schools. 2008 - 2009 Work Plan academie DaVinci-Elem 9 LEASE RENT 1997 116 116 11 116 'lato Academy-Middle 10 LEASE PURCHASE 2004 216 216 4 216 3t. Pete Collegiate-High 109 LEASE RENT 2004 125 175 6 200 Athenian Academy-Elem&Middle 13 LEASE RENT 2000 225 200 8 250 -ife Skills Center-High 7 LEASE RENT 2004 650 450 6 500 Dinellas Prep-Middle 23 LEASE RENT 2002 375 374 6 374 -ife Skills North 7 LEASE RENT 2008 200 200 1 200 4lfred Adler 6 LEASE RENT 2008 37 37 1 37 magine Center 19 LEASE RENT 2008 434 434 1 0 203 2,378 2,202 1,893 Special Purpose Classrooms Tracking the number of classrooms that will be used for certain special purposes in the current year, by facility and type of classroom, that the district will, 1), not use for 3ducational purposes, and 2), the co-teaching classrooms that are not open plan classrooms and will be used for educational purposes. - o - •o Total Educational Classrooms: 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANONA ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 0 0 0 0 4 AZALEA MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 3 0 0 0 3 LARGO MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 3 0 0 0 3 BAUDER ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 BAY POINT MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 14 0 0 0 14 BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 0 0 1 0 4 BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 5 0 0 0 10 BELCHER ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 8 0 1 0 9 BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 11 3 0 0 0 14 BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 18 0 0 18 GIBBS SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 15 1 0 16 GULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 3 0 0 0 7 Page 26 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan ULFPORT ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 IGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 4 0 0 0 8 INGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 7 4 0 0 0 11 4KEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL LEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 0 0 0 0 1 4RG0-CENTRAL-EL-EMENTAR-Y- Go-Teaching---- -- --1 -- ------6 -----0 - 0 - -0 ----- 7 4RGO SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 7 0 0 7 =ALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 7 7 0 0 0 14 IADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 3 0 0 0 3 IADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 8 0 1 0 9 IAXIMO ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 21 2 0 0 0 23 IEADOWLAWN MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 2 0 1 0 3 IELROSE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 6 0 0 0 9 IILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 3 0 0 0 6 LUMB ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 3 0 3 0 7 ONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 0 0 0 0 1 IDGECREST ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 3 0 1 0 7 10 VISTA ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 0 0 1 0 1 IVIERA MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 AFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 6 6 0 1 0 13 AFETY HARBOR b1iDDLC L /l.-'r-- t,;-.,- w v- I GGIVI 1m v n V A Y U V U AWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 9 3 0 0 0 12 T PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 23 0 0 23 AN JOSE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 2 0 0 0 6 ANDY LANE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 3 0 0 0 7 EMINOLE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 2 0 0 0 7 EMINOLE SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 10 0 0 10 -EMINOLE MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 18 0 0 0 18 ;EVENTY-FOURTH STREET iLEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 2 0 0 0 7 ;HORE ACRES ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 4 0 0 0 9 OHN HOPKINS MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 17 0 0 0 17 ;KYVIEW ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 6 5 0 0 0 11 1CMULLEN-BOOTH :LEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 4 0 0 0 6 'ALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY ;ENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 1 0 0 1 IROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 5 0 0 0 9 RONTIER ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 2 0 0 0 6 'age 27 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 =OREST LAKES ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 2 0 1 0 6 SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 2 0 0 0 5 -IIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW) Co-Teaching 10 4 0 0 0 14 DUNE-DIN-EL-EMENTARY-- (NEW-)- -- Go-Teachin - - --- -8- DOUG JAMERSON ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 3 0 0 0 7 I-HURGOOD MARSHALL =UNDAMENTAL MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 3 0 0 0 3 ;AMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 2 0 0 0 5 JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 10 0 0 0 10 'LEARVIEW AVENUE LEMENTARY Co-Teaching 9 7 0 0 0 16 DLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 1 0 0 1 AUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 5 0 0 5 ROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY Co Teaching 7 9 0 0 0 16 ;URLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 12 2 0 1 0 15 -EILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 8 0 0 0 11 DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 1 0 0 1 DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 0 0 1 0 1 ISENHOWER ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 26 9 0 0 0 35 JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 3 0 0 0 6 =UGUITT ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 2 0 0 0 5 -YNCH ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 7 6 0 0 0 13 JERKINS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 1 1 0 0 0 2 3ARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 2 0 0 0 5 MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 2 0 1 0 6 JORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 1 0 0 0 .4 JORTH WARD ELEMENTARY CLEARWATER) Co-Teaching 1 0 0 3 0 4 JORTHWEST ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 5 0 0 0 10 )AKHURST ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 6 0 0 0 9 )LDSMAR ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 6 3 0 0 0 9 )RANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 7 4 0 1 0 12 )ZONA ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 8 4 0 0 0 12 'ALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 3 0 0 0 6 'ALM HARBOR MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 6 0 1 0 7 'ASADENA FUNDAMENTAL :LEMENTARY Co-Teaching 12 2 0 0 0 14 'age 28 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 01 INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan NELLAS CENTRAL .EMENTARY Co-Teaching 6 3 0 1 0 10 )UTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL IDDLE Co-Teaching 0 1 0 0 0 1 RUTH WARD ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 4 7 0 0 0 11 FARKEY ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 10 3 0 0 0 13 1RPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 2 0 0 0 7 \RPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH Co-Teaching 0 0 5 0 0 5 \RPON SPRINGS MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 9 0 0 0 9 !RONE ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 3 0 0 0 3 (BONE MIDDLE Co-Teaching 0 4 0 0 0 4 ALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 0 0 0 1 0 1 OODLAWN ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 3 0 0 0 0 3 )UTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 12 6 0 0 0 18 ePRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 5 2 0 1 0 8 JTHERLAND ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching 2 5 0 0 0 7 EKE SAINT GEORGE -EMENTARY Co-Teaching 12 5 0 0 0 17 Total Co-Teaching Classrooms: 346 334 86 23 0 789 ifrastructure Tracking ?r_agga- offgite infraglritnfl ro -n .eiramnnfc rnclllfinn frnm oxpuri.°ai.n.. yr i'•• schools. This section JLoin 1 I...cju-ie •1111 nJ s..__.ll Ul:lUitl _.._...__ I II VI -1- .-.. ..... .v ...y . . Va1III4 11'IIUU 1 IIIIat IIVlI lated to capacity project schedules and other project schedules (Section 4). me •oposed location of planned facilities, whether those locations are consistent with the comprehensive plans of all affected local governments, and commendations for infrastructure and other improvements to land adjacent to existing facilities. Provisions of 1013.33(12), (13) and (14) and 1013.36 ust be addressed for new facilities planned within the 1st three years of the plan (Section 5). 3D insistent with Comp Plan? Yes et New Classrooms ie number of classrooms, by grade level and type of construction, that were added during the last fiscal year. age 29 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM :?INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan -ist the net new classrooms added in the 2006-07 fiscal year. List the net new classrooms to be added in the 2007-08 fiscal year. Classrooms" is defined as capacity carrying classrooms that are added to increase Totals for fiscal year 2007-08 should match totals in Section 15A. ;apacity to enable the district to meet the Class Size Amendment. uementary trn-off i i v u 4w ioa v 14 10 1 Aiddle (4-8) 11 0 34 45 127 0 15 142 sigh (9-12) 0 0 0 0 53 0 16 69 28 0 61 89 349 0 43 392 Relocatable Student Stations Vumber of students that will be educated in relocatable units, by school, in the current year, and the projected number of students for each of the years in the ivorkplan. 4NONA ELEMENTARY 61 97 r. 137 137 137 114 SZALEA ELEMENTARY 33 33 33 33 33 33 4ZALEA MIDDLE 0 88 132 132 132 97 BARDMOOR ELEMENTARY 22 76 76 76 76 65 LARGO MIDDLE 0 264 264 66 66 132 BAUDER ELEMENTARY 96 96 96 96 96 96 BAY POINT ELEMENTARY 134 134 134 80 80 112 BAY POINT MIDDLE 0 132 132 132 132 106 BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 40 108 108 32 32 64 BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY 136 136 158 158 158 149 BELCHER ELEMENTARY 237 237 237 58 58 165 BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY 228 228 228 152 152 198 BLANTON ELEMENTARY 85 85 85 152 152 112 BOCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH 250 250 250 375 375 300 CAMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY 59 95 95 59 59 73 JOSEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE 88 66 88 88 88 84 CLEARVIEW AVENUE ELEMENTARY 18 76 76 76 76 64 PAUL B STEPHENS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CTR 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLEARWATER SENIOR HIGH 290 290 290 300 300 294 COUNTRYSIDE SENIOR HIGH 150 275 275 250 250 240 CROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY 65 65 75 75 75 71 CURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY 65 127 127 76 76 94 Page 30 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM NELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan )BINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSTON GIFTED PROGRAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 kMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 :ILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY 186 186 186 54 54 133 XIE M JRTIS FUNDAMENTAL atbUNEDIN .EMENTARY 23 0 0 0 0 5 JNEDIN SENIOR HIGH 200 200 200 200 200 200 JNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE 22 0 0 0 0 4 SENHOWER ELEMENTARY 72 72 72 22 22 52 URMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 )HN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY 190 222 222 0 0 127 DRGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 JGUITT ELEMENTARY 73 62 62 62 62 64 'NCH ELEMENTARY 115 180 180 0 0 95 =RKINS ELEMENTARY 0 36 36 36 36 29 4RRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY 63 63 63 40 40 54 IBBS SENIOR HIGH 10 0 0 0 0 2 ULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY 86 116 116 98 98 103 ULFPORT ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 ORRIS TIPS CENTER 77 44 d4 AA AA d(1 IGHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY 18 18 18 18 18 18 4LVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT DUCATION CTR 0 25 25 25 25 20 IGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 =NNEDY MIDDLE 88 44 44 44 44 53 NGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY 18 36 .36 36 36 32 \KEV1EW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 116 108 108 108 108 110 %KEWOOD ELEMENTARY 72 54 54 54 22 51 aKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH 245 275 275 200 200 239 4RGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 55 0 0 0 0 11 ARGO SENIOR HIGH 142 125 125 0 0 78 =ALMAN AVENUE ELEMENTARY 33 62 62 62 62 56 AFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 IADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY 143 169 169 0 0 96 IADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE 22 264 264 132 132 163 IAXIMO ELEMENTARY 112 138 138 66 66 104 age 31 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan MEADOWLAWN MIDDLE 142 198 198 152 152 168 MELROSE ELEMENTARY 84 169 169 169 169 152 MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY 180 252 252 54 54 158 TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY 137 156 156 156 0 121 NINA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH 175 225 225 225 225 215 NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY 36 88 88 88 88 78 NORTH WARD ELEMENTARY (CLEARWATER) 18 58 58 36 36 41 NORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY 18 18 18 18 18 18 NORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL 42 75 75 75 75 68 OAK GROVE MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAKHURST ELEMENTARY 131 180 180 18 18 105 OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY 0 22 22 22 22 18 ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY 117 176 176 176 176 164 OSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH 400 425 425 325 325 380 OSCEOLA MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 OZONA ELEMENTARY 18 36 36 36 36 32 CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD) 128 36 36 0 0 40 PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY 84 162 162 0 0 82 PALM HARBOR MIDDLE 228 286 286 22 22 169 RICHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 36 94 94 94 94 82 CLEARWATER INTERMEDIATE 0 44 44 44 44 35 PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 54 72 72 54 54 61 SEMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 0 175 175 175 175 140 PINELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY 80 122 122 61 61 89 PINELLAS PARK MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 PINELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLUMB ELEMENTARY 73 73 73 73 73 73 PONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY 112 152 152 54 54 105 RIDGECREST ELEMENTARY 36 76 76 36 36 52 RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY 54 195 195 144 144 146 RIVIERA MIDDLE 22 0 0 0 0 4 Page 32 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan AFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY 164 252 252 0 0 134 ;AFETY HARBOR MIDDLE 44 132 132 44 44 79 ;AWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY 91 73 73 73 73 77 T PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH 300 275 275 0 0 170 ;T PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL 0 25 25 25 AN JOSE ELEMENTARY 69 51 51 36 36 49 ANDY LANE ELEMENTARY 0 306 306 0 0 122 -EMINOLE ELEMENTARY 58 144 144 108 108 112 -EMINOLE SENIOR HIGH 250 250 250 250 250 250 ,EMINOLE MIDDLE 76 110 110 44 44 77 EVENTY-FOURTH STREET ELEMENTARY 23 58 58 58 58 51 -HORE ACRES ELEMENTARY 80 80 80 80 80 80 OHN HOPKINS MIDDLE 130 284 284 22 22 148 KYCREST ELEMENTARY 109 262 262 108 108 170 KYVIEW ELEMENTARY 67 102 102 54 54 76 OUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE 22 22 22 22 22 22 OUTH WARD ELEMENTARY 18 0 0 0 0 4 TARKEY ELEMENTARY 18 58 58 0 0 27 IARJORIE KINNAN RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY 36 58 58 58 58 54 UNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER ^ 0 v u 0 ARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 ARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH 40 15 15 15 15 20 INELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 25 18 18 18 18 19 ARPON SPRINGS MIDDLE 54 176 176 176 176 152 YRONE ELEMENTARY 51 330 330 330 330 274 YRONE MIDDLE 142 80 80 80 80 92 ARPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 22 22 22 22 22 22 IALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY 54 44 44 44 0 37 IESTGATE ELEMENTARY 62 62 62 0 0 37 IOODLAWN ELEMENTARY 54 0 0 0 0 11 AST LAKE SENIOR HIGH 75 75 75 75 75 75 OUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY 44 40 40 0 0 25 YPRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY 58 54 54 0 0 33 UTHERLAND ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 4KE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 age 33 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 )INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan )RUID COMPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACMULLEN-BOOTH ELEMENTARY 62 80 80 0 0 44 'ALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH 125 825 825 0 0 355 3ROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY 80 80 80 76 76 78 =RONTIER ELEMENTARY 90 90 90 90 90 90 )OACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE 110 110 110 110 110 110 =OREST LAKES ELEMENTARY 108 108 108 40 40 81 )OUG JAMERSON ELEMENTARY 40 82 82 108 108 84 TAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 -HURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY 18 18 18 18 18 18 3AYSIDE HIGH 0 0 0 0 0 0 )AK PARK SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 _EALMAN INTERMEDIATE 88 88 88 88 88 88 1IGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 )UNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 JEW HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 rotal students in relocatables by year. 9,545 14,036 14,174 8,558 8,326 10,928 l-otal number of COFTE students projected by year. 209,404 98,216 95,819 94,129 93,084 118,130 'ercent in relocatables by year. 5% 14% 15% 9% 9% 9% Leased Facilities Tracking Exising leased facilities and plans for the acquisition of leased facilities, including the number of classrooms and student stations, as reported in the educational alant survey, that are planned in that location at the end of the five year workplan. LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE 4 88 ModSpace 0 0 ANONA ELEMENTARY 3 43 ModSpace 0 0 BAUDER ELEMENTARY 2 37 ModSpace 0 0 BAY POINT ELEMENTARY 3 50 ModSpace 0 0 BAY VISTA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 2 40 ModSpace 0 0 BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY 5 103 ModSpace 0 0 BELCHER ELEMENTARY 2 36 ModSpace 0 0 BELLEAIR ELEMENTARY 11 232 Williams Scotsman 0 0 Page 34 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 3LANTON ELEMENTARY 3 45 ModSpace 0 0 3OCA CIEGA SENIOR HIGH 2 50 ModSpace 0 0 3ULF BEACHES ELEMENTARY 5 86 ModSpace 0 0 iIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (OLD) 0 0 ModSpace 0 0 ;ENNEDY MIDDLE - ----- --- -- -_?._---_-.__2. _---------_88. .ModSpace----- ------.-- _-_0. ._ _- 0 AKEVIEW FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 6 116 ModSpace 0 0 AKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 4 72 ModSpace 0 0 AKEWOOD SENIOR HIGH 3 75 ModSpace 0 0 ARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1 15 ModSpace 0 0 4ADEIRA BEACH ELEMENTARY 4 94 ModSpace 0 0 4ADEIRA BEACH MIDDLE 1 22 ModSpace 0 0 4AXIMO ELEMENTARY 3 58 ModSpace 0 0 4ELR0SE ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 11LDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY 5 90 ModSpace 0 0 'INELLAS PARK ELEMENTARY 2 66 ModSpace 0 0 'LUMB ELEMENTARY 4 73 ModSpace 0 0 'ONCE DE LEON ELEMENTARY 5 130 ModSpace/William s Scotsman 0 0 IIDGECREST ELEMENTARY 2 36 ModSpace 0 0 110 VISTA ELEMENTARY 2 94 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 AFETY HARBOR ELEMENTARY 3 63 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 AWGRASS LAKE ELEMENTARY 1 18 Williams Scotsman 0 0 T PETERSBURG SENIOR HIGH 6 150 ModSpace/William s Scotsman 0 0 AN JOSE ELEMENTARY 1 18 Williams Scotsman 0 0 EMINOLE ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 EMINOLE SENIOR HIGH 10 250 ModSpace 0 0 EMINOLE MIDDLE 3 54 ModSpace 0 0 HORE ACRES ELEMENTARY 4 80 ModSpace 0 0 KYCREST ELEMENTARY 1 41 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 KYVIEW ELEMENTARY 2 23 ModSpace 0 0 RUID COMPLEX 0 22 Williams Scotsman 0 0 ALM HARBOR UNIVERSITY SENIOR HIGH 3 275 i ModSpace/William s Scotsman 0 0 ROOKER CREEK ELEMENTARY 2 88 Williams Scotsman 0 0 RONTIER ELEMENTARY 4 72 ModSpace 0 0 age 35 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 'OACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE 5 110 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 =OREST LAKES ELEMENTARY 6 108 ModSpace 0 0 DOUG JAMERSON ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 '.AMPBELL PARK ELEMENTARY 3 54 ModSpace 0 0 ;LEARWATER SENIOR HIGH 8 200 ModSpace 0 0 ROSS BAYOU ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 DURLEW CREEK ELEMENTARY 2 32 ModSpace 0 0 _EILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY 9 158 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 :;URTIS FUNDAMENTAL at DUNEDIN ELEMENTARY 1 5 ModSpace 0 0 DUNEDIN SENIOR HIGH 4 100 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY 3 50 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 JOHN M SEXTON ELEMENTARY 7 168 ModSpace 0 0 FUGUITT ELEMENTARY 1 22 ModSpace 0 0 LYNCH ELEMENTARY 4 86 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 GARRISON-JONES ELEMENTARY 3 45 ModSpace 0 0 MOUNT VERNON ELEMENTARY 4 76 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 NORTHEAST SENIOR HIGH 6 150 ModSpace 0 0 NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 NORTHWEST ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 OAKHURST ELEMENTARY 2 40 ModSpace 0 0 OLDSMAR ELEMENTARY 0 18 Williams Scotsman 0 0 ORANGE GROVE ELEMENTARY 5 90 ModSpace/William s Scotsman 0 0 OZONA ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 CURTIS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY (OLD) 3 62 ModSpace 0 0 PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY 3 62 ModSpace 0 0 PALM HARBOR MIDDLE 4 88 ModSpace 0 0 PASADENA FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 PINELLAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 3 54 ModSpace 0 0 SOUTHSIDE FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE 1 44 ModSpace 0 0 STARKEY ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 TARPON SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 0 0 ModSpace 0 0 Page 36 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM -, • • INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan kRPON SPRINGS MIDDLE 3 186 Williams Scotsman 0 0 (BONE MIDDLE 3 88 ModSpace 0 0 kRPON SPRINGS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTARY 1 22 ModSpace 0 0 ALSINGHAM ELEMENTARY 3 54 ModSpace/William s Scotsman 0 0 ESTGATE-EL-EMENTAR--Y-------------------.---- - - ------- NST LAKE SENIOR HIGH 3 75 Williams Scotsman/ModSpa ce 0 0 (PRESS WOODS ELEMENTARY 3 58 ModSpace 0 0 )SEPH L CARWISE MIDDLE 4 88 ModSpace 0 0 JNSET HILLS ELEMENTARY 1 18 ModSpace 0 0 ?ALEA ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 ?ALEA MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 %RDMOOR ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 %Y POINT MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 :)BINSON SCHOOL SERVICE CENTER 0 0 0 0 SSTON GIFTED PROGRAM 0 0 0 0 OMILTON DISSTON S E D CENTER 0 0 0 0 XIE M HOLLINS SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 JNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 \IRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY n n n n ORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 =RKINS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 IBBS SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 ULFPORT ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 ORRIS TIPS CENTER 0 0 0 0 GHLAND LAKES ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 OLVIN HUNSINGER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT DUCATION CTR 0 0 0 0 NGS HIGHWAY ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 \RGO SENIOR HIGH 1 22 Modspace 0 0 OFETY HARBOR SECONDARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 EADOWLAWN MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 DMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER 0 0 0 0 INA HARRIS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION ENTER 0 0 0 0 ORTH WARD SECONDARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 ORWOOD SECONDARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 age 37 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM :)INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan )AK GROVE MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 DSCEOLA SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 )SCEOLA MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 31CHARD L SANDERS SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 3EMINOLE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 0 0 0 0 'INELLAS PARK MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 'INELLAS PARK SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 31VIERA MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 SAFETY HARBOR MIDDLE 2 44 Modspace 0 0 3T PETERSBURG VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL NSTITUTE 0 0 0 0 3ANDY LANE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 SUNSET HILLS SERVICE CENTER 0 0 0 0 TARPON SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 'INELLAS VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 0 0 0 0 FYRONE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 NOODLAWN ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 SOUTHERN OAK ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 SUTHERLAND ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 -AKE SAINT GEORGE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 JAMES SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 rHURGOOD MARSHALL FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 3AYSIDE HIGH 0 0 0 0 DAK PARK SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 -IIGH POINT ELEMENTARY (NEW) 0 0 0 0 )UNEDIN ELEMENTARY (NEW) 0 0 0 0 4EW HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 1 247 5,650 0 0 =ailed Standard Relocatable Tracking 3elocatable units currently reported by school, from FISH, and the number of relocatable units identified as 'Failed Standards'. 'age 38 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT mm.? NONA ELEMENTARY N-RG.O_MIDDLE %RGO MIDDLE 4RGO MIDDLE EAR CREEK LEMENTARY ELLEAIR LEMENTARY ELLEAIR LEMENTARY LANTON LEMENTARY OCA CIEGA SENIOR IGH LEARVIEW AVENUE LEMENTARY LEARVIEW AVENUE LEMENTARY ROSS BAYOU LEMENTARY URLEW CREEK LEMENTARY OBINSON SCHOOL ERVICE CENTER )HN M SEXTON LEMENTARY )HN M SEXTON LEMENTARY (NCH ELEMENTARY (NCH ELEMENTARY ULF BEACHES LEMENTARY ALVIN HUNSINGER XCEPTIONAL TUDENT DUCATION CTR ENNEDY MIDDLE ADEIRA BEACH LEMENTARY ADEIRA BEACH LEMENTARY ELROSE LEMENTARY OUNT VERNON LEMENTARY ORTHEAST SENIOR IGH 3 SCHOOL BOARD 18 12• .LEASE-RENT---- ---- 0 5 SCHOOL BOARD 0 2 FEDERAL 0 5 SCHOOL BOARD 33 1 FEDERAL 0 12 LEASE RENT 210 8 FEDERAL 40 15 SCHOOL BOARD 200 3 SCHOOL BOARD 18 1 FEDERAL 0 2 SCHOOL BOARD 15 5 SCHOOL BOARD 33 1 SCHOOL BOARD 0 8 LEASE RENT 146 1 FEDERAL 0 5 LEASE RENT 64 1 FEDERAL 0 1 SCHOOLBOARD 0 2 SCHOOL BOARD 0 4 LEASE RENT 44 5 LEASE RENT 76 6 SCHOOL BOARD 67 8 FEDERAL 66 2 SCHOOL BOARD 18 3 SCHOOL BOARD 25 0 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 2 0 -3 2011 2 ----0 ------ --12 --2011- - 5 0 -5 2011 2 0 -2 2011 3 0 -5 2011 1 0 -1 2011 1 0_ -12 2011 5 0 -8 2011 7 0 -15 2011 2 0 -3 2011 1 0 -1 2011 1 0 -2 2011 3 0 -5 2011 1 0 -1 2011 1 0 -8 2011 1 0 -1 2011 1 0 -5 2011 1 0 -1 2011 1 0 -1 2011 2 0 -2 2011 2 0 -4 2011 1 0 -5 2011 2 0 -6 2011 5 0 -8 2011 1 0 -2 2011 2 0 -3 2011 age 39 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 :1INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan JORTH SHORE 4 SCHOOL BOARD 18 3 0 -4 2011 LEMENTARY JORTH WARD 1 LEASE RENT 0 1 0 -1 2011 LEMENTARY CLEARWATER) )LDSMAR 1 LEASE RENT 0 1 0 -1 2011 LEMENTARY )RANGE GROVE 4 SCHOOL BOARD 22 -- 3 ----- - - 0 ---- -----.?-- -4 ----- ....__. . 2011 ELEMENTARY DSCEOLA SENIOR 17 SCHOOL BOARD 400 1 0 -17 2011 AIGH 'ALM HARBOR 2 SCHOOL BOARD 22 1 0 -2 2011 LEMENTARY 3EMINOLE 2 SCHOOL BOARD 0 2 0 -2 2011 ?OCATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 'INELLAS PARK 3 LEASE RENT 44 1 0 -3 2011 ELEMENTARY 'ONCE DE LEON 7 LEASE RENT 94 2 0 -7 2011 ELEMENTARY PIO VISTA 5 LEASE RENT 36 3 0 -5 2011 ELEMENTARY PIO VISTA 5 SCHOOL BOARD 0 5 0 -5 2011 ELEMENTARY PIO VISTA 4 FEDERAL 18 3 0 -4 2011 ELEMENTARY RIVIERA MIDDLE 3 SCHOOL BOARD 22 2 0 -3 2011 SAFETY HARBOR 4 LEASE RENT 45 1 0 -4 2011 ELEMENTARY SAFETY HARBOR 2 SCHOOL BOARD 18 1 0 -2 2011 ELEMENTARY SEMINOLE 4 SCHOOL BOARD 18 3 0 -4 2011 ELEMENTARY SEMINOLE MIDDLE 1 SCHOOL BOARD 0 1 0 -1 2011 JOHN HOPKINS 12 SCHOOL BOARD 108 7 0 -12 2011 MIDDLE SKYCREST 3 LEASE RENT 5 2 0 -3 2011 ELEMENTARY SKYCREST 8 SCHOOL BOARD 76 4 0 -8 2011 ELEMENTARY SKYCREST 4 FEDERAL 28 2 0 -4 2011 ELEMENTARY SOUTHSIDE 2 LEASE RENT 22 1 0 -2 2011 FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE STARKEY 1 SCHOOL BOARD 0 1 0 -1 2011 ELEMENTARY STARKEY 1 FEDERAL 0 1 0 -1 2011 ELEMENTARY PINELLAS 2 SCHOOL BOARD 25 1 0 -2 2011 VOCATIONAL- TECHNICAL INSTITUTE TARPON SPRINGS 9 LEASE RENT 54 6 0 -9 2011 MIDDLE TYRONE MIDDLE 4 LEASE RENT 66 1 0 -4 2011 Page 40 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 0 0 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan YRONE MIDDLE 10 SCHOOL BOARD 44 7 0 -10 2011 YRONE MIDDLE 3 FEDERAL 32 1 0 -3 2011 JOODLAWN 2 FEDERAL 18 1 0 -2 2011 LEMENTARY ICMULLEN-BOOTH 3 SCHOOL BOARD 40 1 0 -3 LEMENTARY 2011 AL-M-HA-RBOR-----. _------j1" L-EASE-RENT--- -- -- --- 75 -`-? 8 0 _11 2011 NIVERSITY SENIOR IGH ALM HARBOR 22 SCHOOL BOARD 50 20 0 -22 2011 NIVERSITY SENIOR IGH ROOKER CREEK 4 LEASE RENT 44 2 0 4 LEMENTARY - 2011 291 2,517 166 0 -291 1lanning -lass Size Reduction Planning lans approved by the school board that reduce the need for permanent student stations such as acceptable school capacity levels, redistricting, using, year-round schools, charter schools, magnet schools, public-private partnerships, multitrack scheduling, grade level organization, block :heduling, or other alternatives. ie Pinellas County School Board has reduced the need for permanent student stations in our district by approving several charter schools. During the 2007-08 :hoof year, the district began a high school partnership Early College Program in cooperation with St. Petersburg College. The Early College Program is being <panded to two additional college sites for 2008-09. Students in grades 11 and 12 may enroll full time in dual credit college courses on the Clearwater Campus, eminole Campus or Tarpon Springs Campus of SPC in order to simultaneously meet their graduation requirements and earn college credits. The school district currently in a period of declining enrollment. chool Closure Planning fans for the closure of any school, Including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues. one ige 41 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 3INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 i M 2008 - 2009 Work Plan Long Range Planning fen-Year Maintenance )istrict projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation, repair, and maintenance projects within the district in years 6-10 beyond the xojects,plans-detailed_in_the_five_years_coveredby_the-work-plan.____...____.______.__._.___ fen-Year Capacity ichedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs for the uture 5 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. Tyrone Middle (Replacement) South County $46,000,000 3iviera Middle (Replacement) South County $59,000,000 'alm Harbor Elem, Construct North County $20,000,000 -ynch Elem (Replacement) South County $35,000,000 Safety Harbor Elem (Replacement) North County $31,000,000 -argo Sr (Replacement) North County $84,000,000 'inellas Park Middle, Construct South County $35,000,000 3auder Elem, Construct South County $1,000,000 San Jose Elem (Replacement) North County $1,000,000 3io Vista Elem (Replacement) South County $1,000,000 vtount Vernon Elem, Construct South County $1,000,000 Vorth Shore Elem, Construct South County $1,000,000 Skyview Elem (Replacement) South County $1,000,000 uulf Beaches Elem (Replacement) South County $1,000,000 Page 42 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM i NELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 2008 - 2009 Work Plan intonElem, Construct South County $1,000,000 nce De Leon Elem (Replacement) North County $1,000,000 untryside High, Construct North County $1,000,000 therland Elem, Construct North County $407,211 Im Harbor Univ High, Construct North County $1,000,000 ideira Beach Middle (Replacement) South County $1,000,000 ange Grove Elem, Construct South County $1,000,000 $323,407,211 :n-Year Planned Utilization hedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings, capacities, and planned utilization rates of future educational facilities of the strict for both permanent and relocatable facilities. gmentary - District itals 50,986 50,986 47,511.80 93.19% 1 -4,185 43,964 93.94 ddle - District Totals 27,894 25,105 23,502.95 93.62% -694 21,748 89.09 gh - District Totals 38,195 36,100 33,042.68 91.53% -2,546 30,574 91.12% her - ESE, etc 71629 5,866 1,726.59 29.44% -1,501 1,598 36.61 % 124,704 118,057 105,784.02 89.60% -8,926 97,884 89.69% 3n-Year Infrastructure Planning •oposed Location of Planned New, Remodeled, or New Additions to Facilities In 06 thru 10 out years (Section 28). 3D ans for closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues in the 06 thru 10 out ,ars (Section 29). 3ne wenty-Year Maintenance istrict projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation, repair, and maintenance projects within the district in years 11-20 beyond the ojects plans detailed in the five years covered by the work plan. age 43 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM r ? • 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan 'wenty-Year Capacity schedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs for the iture 11-20 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. ieminole Vocational Center, Construct South County $7,441,417 >t Petersburg High, Construct South County $13,799,282 >eminole High, Construct South County $24,926,339 ;toss Bayou Elem (Replacement) South County $20,000,000 )sceola High, Construct South County $16,147,014 .ealman Ave Elem, Construct South County $5,043,020 .akeview Fund Elem South County $4,926,808 ielleair Elem, Construct North County $4,281,828 safety Harbor Secondary, Construct North County $642,475 'TEC Clearwater, Construct North County $24,339,733 Aildred Helms Elem, Construct North County $2,680,106 knona Elem, Construct North County $3,695,856 'TEC St Pete, Construct South County $26,401,949 :urtis Fund Elem, Construct North County $1,716,058 .akewood High, Construct South County $15,409,210 azalea Elem, Construct South County $5,016,847 Aadeira Beach Elem (Replacement) South County $20,000,000 'age 44 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan iy Vista Fund Elem South County $2,469,636 alcher Elem, Construct North County $7,564,078 arrison Jones Elem, Construct North County $455,405 iwgrass-L-ake-Elem; Construct--- aminole Elem, Construct )mlinson Adult, Construct nellas Park High, Construct aim Harbor Middle, Construct andy Lane Elem, Construct arthwest Elem, Construct akhurst Elem, Construct tzgerald Middle, Construct Vcrest Elem, Construct dgecrest Eleirn, Construct annedy Middle, Construct nellas Park Elem, Construct xtheast High, Construct, Construct ast Lake High, Construct earwater High, Construct awlings Elem, Construct aventy-Forth St. Elem, Construct estgate Elem, Construct earwater Intermediate, Construct Bachman Fund Middle, Construct South County South County South County North County North County South County North County North County North County North County North County South County South County North County North County South County South County South County North County North County $3,815,601 $63,500 $3,278,242 $6,872,712 $853,265 $292,100 $1,212,738 $19,532,962 $3,032,232 $811,505 $283,045 $1,943,330 $17,678,711 $1,000,000 $60,000,000 $10,000,000 $3,966,005 $39,900 $887,673 $1,967,771 age 45 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan arpon Springs Middle, Construct North County $7,918,394 uguitt Elem, Construct North County $3,377,187 'lumb Elem, Construct North County $2,053,741 'inellas Central Elem, Construct South County $2,035,141 )sceola Middle, Construct South County $240,398 lighland Lakes Elem, Construct North County $165,495 Voodlawn Elem, Construct South County $752,102 ?ardmoor Elem, Construct South County $19,950,000 )arwise Middle, Construct North County $500,000 .eila Davis Elem, Construct North County $7,920,688 .argo Central Elem, Construct North County $2,114,110 ;eminole Middle, Construct South County $3,221,816 )ixie Hollins High, Construct South County $2,063,287 .argo Middle, Construct North County $500,000 4elrose Elem, Construct South County $1,082,186 rear Creek Elem, Construct South County $1,253,323 rontier Elem, Construct North County $2,384,183 )Idsmar Comm, Construct North County $5,000,000 -arpon Springs High, Construct North County $20,000,000 orest Lakes Elem, Construct North County $203,187 southern Oak Elem, Construct North County $266,779 sings Highway Elem, Construct North County $2,675,882 Valsingham Elem, Construct North County $34,750,000 .akewood Elem, Construct South County $63,312 'age 46 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM 'INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT • 2008 - 2009 Work Plan urlew Creek Elem, Construct North County $376,939 asadena Fund Elem, Construct South County $2,422,574 leadowlawn Middle, Construct South County $919,835 alvin-Hunsinger-Center,•Gonstruct-------------- South`C60hty--- ------- - -'- - ^? - "'-'- - _- $211,769 ay Point Elem, Construct South County $52,175 ay Point Middle, Construct South County $500,000 aximo Elem, Construct South County $500,000 cMullen Booth Elem, Construct North County $227,346 rke St George Elem, Construct North County $200,178 On Hopkins Middle, Construct South County $500,000 inedin High, Construct North County $500,000 ooker Creek Elem, Construct North County $2,958,559 tpress Woods Elem, Construct North County $410,834 senhower Elern, Construci North County $8,022,573 dsmar Elem, Construct North County $2,196,894 !ona Elem, Construct North County $172,217 Enderlin Elem, Construct South County $1,437,549 Am Elem, Construct South County $25,013 alea Middle, Construct South County $500,000 Lmpbell Park Elem, Construct South County $500,000 inedin Middle, Construct North County $500,000 irmount Park Elem, Construct South County $210,103 Oport Elem, Construct South County $500,000 rkins Elem, Construct South County $1,806,596 ge 47 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM n INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008 - 2009 Work Plan amilton Disston Center, Construct South County $5,097,963 imerson Elem, Construct South County $71,000 rea I, Construct South County $1,268,472 icfiard Sanders"Center; Consstruct__ _...._.."_ . South County ""$689,924- tephens ESE Center, Construct North County $500,000 ina Harris Center, Construct South County $500,000 dministration Bldg, Construct North County $8,690 /alter Pownall Service Center, Construct North County $4,058,200 igh Point Service Center, Construct South County $524,016 learwater Bus Compound, Construct North County $11,795,514 ealman Bus Compound, Construct North County $2,638,425 rea 3 North County $1,268,472 rea 2 North County $1,268,472 $520,634,208 wenty-Year Planned Utilization -chedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings, capacities, and planned utilization rates of future educational facilities of the istrict for both permanent and relocatable facilities. lementary - District otais 50,986 50,986 47,511.80 93.19% -4,481 43,964 94.54% 4iddle - District Totals 27,894 25,105 23,502.95 93.62% -1,003 21,748 90.23% ligh - District Totals 38,195 36,100 33,042.68 91.53% -2,785 30,574 91.77% )ther - ESE, etc 7,629 5,866 1,726.59 29.44% 1 -1,536 1,598 36.91 % 124,704 118,057 105,784.02 89.60% 1 -9,805 97,884 90.42 - "wenty-Year Infrastructure Planning 'roposed Location of Planned New, Remodeled, or New Additions to Facilities in 11 thru 20 out years (Section 28). 'age 48 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM ' T. 0 INELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2008.- 2009 Work Plan BD lans for closure of any school, Including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues In the 11 thru 20 out ?ars (Section 29). one age 49 of 49 8/6/2008 4:08:18 PM • • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Governor April 1, 2008 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33158-4748 _T.HQMAS_G._ PELHAM jSecretary I APR _ 3 2009 L_- .. j PLAW;.. f, DEVELOPMENT ?- I ? ;?Ef=??;?ES I Dear Mr. Delk: This is in response to your letter dated March 26, 2008, requesting a six-month extension for the adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to further coordination between transportation and land use to the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The Department may grant the additional a six-month extension for the adoption of the Evaluation and' Appraisal Report based amendments, if the request is justif ed by good and sufficient cause and furthers the coordination with the Metropolitan Planning Organization program pursuant to Section 163.3191(10), Florida Statutes. The Department has reviewed your request and accepts the reasons as sufficient cause and grants the City of Clearwater the extension. Please submit the EAR-based amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Community Planning, Plan Processing Team by May 29, 2009. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Bernard Piawah, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 487-4545. Sincerely, P/t4 ?4 ` Mike McDaniel Chief of Comprehensive Planning 0- M. Gerald Smelt, Principal Planner Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.stateJI.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING HOUSING S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon. FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee. FL 37399-2100 ? {f???taayj?t t Y? ,err - ? "'??;46''B+ PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 26, 2008 C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CIZARIVATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BuII.DING, 100 SOI rH WR-n.i, AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33 756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator State of Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: Request for Extension of Time Dear Ms. Winningham: MAR Z 8 2008 17 _CP 71 prAA pf` Please accept this as the City of Clearwater's official request for a second extension of time for completion of changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan as required by our Evaluation and Appraisal Report. On September 17, 2007, the Department of Community Affairs granted the City of Clearwater's first 6-month extension request as per 163.3191(10), F.S. This approval established November 29, 2008 rather than May 29, 2008 as our deadline for concluding the update. We are currently continuing our in-house work on this extensive project. We have met with the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff to discuss transportation issues involved with our EAR based amendments project. The MPO is working on a draft ordinance to address the concurrency issue for US 19 (new standard "D" for long-term concurrency). We will be working with them on their efforts relative to the portion of US 19 which runs through the City of Clearwater. As the County MPO's draft ordinance is planned for the end of the year, we respectfully request another 6-month extension as per 163.3191 (10), F.S., to allow more time for coordination between transportation and land use, for the purposes of improving Florida's transportation system, in coordination with the Metropolitan Planning Organization program. Sandra Herman of our staff is the lead planner on this project. If there are any questions with regard to this request, please do not hesitate to contact her at (727) 562-4586. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director • CC: Sara Ward, Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization Al Bartolotta, Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 0 T%AL EA9PLOY\%IENT AND AFFiPNix IVE ACr1ON EMPLOYER' r CITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 26, 2008 Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator State of Florida Department of Community Affairs - 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard . Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: Request for Extension of Time Dear Ms. Winningham: Please accept this as the City of Clearwater's official request for a second extension of time for completion of changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan as required by our Evaluation and Appraisal Report. On September 17, 2007, the Department of Community Affairs granted the City of Clearwater's first 6-month extension request as per 163.3191(10), F.S. This approval established November 29, 2008 rather than May 29, 2008 as our deadline for concluding the update. We are currently continuing our in-house work on this extensive project. We have met with the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff to discuss transportation issues involved with our EAR based amendments project. The MPO is working on a draft ordinance to address the concurrency issue for US 19 (new standard "D" for long-term concurrency). We will be working with them on their efforts relative to the portion of US 19 which runs through the City of Clearwater. As the County MPO's draft ordinance is planned for the end of the year, we respectfully request another 6-month extension as per 163.3191 (10), F.S., to allow more time for coordination between transportation and land use, for the purposes of improving Florida's transportation system, in coordination with the Metropolitan Planning Organization program. Sandra Herman of our staff is the lead planner on this project. If there are any questions with regard to this request, please do not hesitate to contact her at (727) 562-4586. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director CC: Sara Ward, Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization Al Bartolotta, Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 0 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Governor September 17, 200' • Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 337584748 RE: Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report Extension Dear Mr. Delk: s?S D ( kC 020w f PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER . This is in response to your letter dated September 13, 2007, requesting a six-month extension for the adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The Department may grant the extension for the adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report based amendments, if the request is justified by good and sufficient cause pursuant to Section 163.3191(10), Florida Statutes. The Department has reviewed your request and accepts the reasons as sufficient cause and grants the City of Clearwater the extension. Please submit the EAR-based amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Community Planning, Plan Processing Team by November 29, 2008. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 487-4545. Sincerely Mike McDaniel Chief of Comprehensive Planning cc: Jessica White, Principal Planner Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 2556 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.doa.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING HOUSING 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 25% Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon. FL 33050.2227 Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 4 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727)?,5-62 x567--'-- *x-P4T- - x-4.865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 13, 2007 Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator State of Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Sbumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: Request for Extension of Time SEP 2 0 2007 f PUNNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF'CLEARWATER;•," Dear Ms. Winningham: . Please accept this as the City of Clearwater's official request for an extension of time for completion of changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan as required by our Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Following the finding of Sufficiency for our EAR on November 29, 2006, we commenced work on the comprehensive plan update. It was and remains our intention to perform this work in- house. To date, our Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) has reviewed two of five issues of local concern as identified in the EAR. Due to the size and complexity of the task of completing this work, additional time will be necessary. Therefore, the City of Clearwater respectfully requests approval of a six-month extension as per 163.3191(10) F.S. for adoption of EAR-based amendments. This would establish November 29, 2008 rather than May 29, 2008 as our deadline for concluding the update. Sandra Herman of our staff is the lead planner on this project. If there are any questions with regard to this request, please do not hesitate to contact her at (727) 562-4586. Sincerely, Michael De , I Planning Director FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILWMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL. JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS " pxti( to making EL L r -, ?o 1 RrFS 19 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY CG PW1JER Florida a better place to call home" THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary February 13, 2009 The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard: The Department of Community Affairs (Department) has completed its review of the adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of Clearwater (DCA Number 08-2AR), adopted by Ordinance 7993-08 on December 18, 2008, and determined that it meets the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, for compliance, as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. The adopted amendment package consists of an update to the Comprehensive Plan based on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The Department is issuing a Notice of Intent to find the plan amendment in compliance. The Notice of Intent has been sent to the Tampa Tribune for publication on February 16, 2009. The Department's Notice of Intent to find a plan amendment in compliance shall be deemed to be a final order if no timely petition challenging the amendment is filed. Any affected person may file a petition with the agency within 21 days after the publication of the notice of intent pursuant to Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes. No development orders, or permits for a development, dependent on the amendment may be issued or commence before the plan amendments take effect. Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c)2., Florida Statutes, requires a local government that has an Internet site to post a copy of the Department's Notice of Intent on the site within 5 days after receipt of the mailed copy of the agency's notice of intent. Please note that a copy of the adopted City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Notice of Intent must be available for public inspection Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays, during normal business hours at the City of Clearwater Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) ? 850-921-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state,ff.us ? COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2356(p) 850-488-3309(f) • FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST &50-922-2207(p) 850-921-1747 (f) • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8501-488-7956(p) 850-922-5623(f) t? The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard February 13, 2009 Page Two r If an affected person challenges this in-compliance determination, you will have the option of mediation pursuant to Subsection 163.3189(3)(a), Florida Statutes. If you choose to attempt to resolve this matter through mediation, you must file the request for mediation with the administrative law judge assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The choice of mediation will not affect the right of any party to an administrative hearing. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Jenkins, Senior Planner, at (850) 922- 1803. MM/vj Enclosure: Notice of Intent Sincerely, Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning cc: Sandra Herman, Planner III, City of Clearwater Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS NOTICE OF INTENT TO FIND CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN COMPLIANCE DOCKET NO.08-2AR-NOI-5206-(A)-(I) The Department gives notice of its intern to find the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Clearwater, adopted by Ordinance No. 7993-08 on December 18, 2008, IN COMPLIANCE, pursuant to Sections 163.3184, 163.3187 and 163.3189, F.S. The adopted City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, (if any), are available for public inspection Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays, during normal business hours, at the City of Clearwater Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756. Any affected person, as defined in Section 163.3184, F.S., has a right to petition for an administrative hearing to challenge the proposed agency determination that the Amendment to the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan is In Compliance, as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1), F.S. The petition must be filed within twenty-one (21) days after publication of this notice, and must include all of the information and contents described in Uniform Rule 28-106.201, F.A.C. The petition must be filed with the Agency Clerk, Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, and a copy mailed or delivered to the local government. Failure to timely file a petition shall constitute a waiver of any right to request an administrative proceeding as a petitioner under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. If a petition is filed, the purpose of the administrative hearing will be to present evidence and testimony and forward a recommended order to the Department. If no petition is filed, this Notice of Intent shall become final agency action. If a petition is filed, other affected persons may petition for leave to intervene in the proceeding. A petition for intervention must be filed at least twenty (20) days before the final hearing and must include all of the information and contents described in Uniform Rule 28- 106.205, F.A.C. A petition for leave to intervene shall be filed at the Division of Administrative Hearings, Department of Management Services, 1230 Apalachee Parkway, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060. Failure to petition to intervene within the allowed time frame constitutes a waiver of any right such a person has to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., or to participate in the administrative hearing. After an administrative hearing petition is timely filed, mediation is available pursuant to Sub-section 163.3189(3)(x), F.S., to any affected person who is made a party to the proceeding by filing that request with the administrative law judge assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The choice of mediation shall not affect a party's right to an administrative hearing. Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahasee, Florida 32399-2100 • s STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Govemor January 9, 2009 Ms. Sandra E. Herman, Planner H City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Herman: THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary Thank you for submitting copies of the adopted City of Clearwater comprehensive plan amendment DCA. 08-2AR adopted by Ordinance No. 7993-08 on December 18, 2008, for our review. We have conducted an inventory of the plan amendment package to verify the inclusion of all required materials. The submission package appears to be complete and your adopted plan amendment will be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be asked to provide additional supporting documentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review. The Department will conduct a compliance review and issue a Notice of Intent regarding the adopted comprehensive plan amendment on or about February 16, 2009. Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c)2, Florida Statutes, requires a local government that has an internet site to post a copy of the Department's Notice of Intent on the site within 5 days after receipt of the mailed copy of the agency's notice of intent. If you have any questions, please contact, Bernard Piawah Regional Planning Administrator for region 8, who will be assigning the adopted plan amendment for review at (850) 488-4925. Sincerely, R/-- D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processor Manny Pumariega, AICP, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council RF ECEM Q S Q A ! ,D? 850-488-841 ZD SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-921-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state.fl.us 66(p) 850-488,3309 (Q • FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST &504W-2207(p) 850.921-1747 (t) • AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850488-706(p) 850-922-5823 (t) i? ? ? .r f.•yr ? O -+"•wrrxr® PLANNING DEPARTN4F_NT December 31, 2008 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERvICEs BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 RE: Transmittal of Adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package - Based on the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 / DCA08-2AR Dear Mr. Eubanks: The City of Clearwater is submitting this transmittal as part of the requirements pursuant to 9J'11.006 "Submittal Requirements for Proposed Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments". This is the City's transmittal of its plan amendment package for the Amendments Based on the City of Clearwater 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) pursuant to F.S. Sections 163.3177(6), 163.3184, 163.3187, and 163.3191(10). The initial transmittal was sent to DCA on September 9, 2008. The Department sent the ORC report on November 10, 2008. Responses to the ORC report are included with this transmittal, including necessary revisions and requested documents. The City is transmitting three (3) copies of the following one (1) adopted Plan Amendment with this letter: CPA2007-06003 - Plan Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance Number 7993-08 includes Exhibit A) / DCA08-2AR 9J-11.006 1)(a)l: The Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB), as the Local Planning Agency, held a public meeting on December 16, 2008 for CPA2007-06003 to review changes in response to the ORC report. 0 The CDB recommended approval to the City Council. December 31, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 2 of 5 9J-11.006(1) a)2: The Clearwater City Council, as the local governing body, held an adoption public hearing meeting on December 18, 2008 for CPA2007-06003. • The City Council approved the adoption of CPA2007-06003 (that included changes as per the ORC report). The City received no requests for information and no objections from citizens at the hearing held by the Local Planning Agency or the adoption hearing as shown by the enclosed Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information Lists. The above plan amendment package and one copy of each item specified under paragraphs 9J- 11.006(1)(a), (b) and (c), FAC, were sent to the Pinellas County Planning Department, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, the Southwest Florida Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Education, the Florida Department of State and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, as identified in 9J-11.009(6) under separate cover on this date. 9J-11.006(1)(a)3: The following is the summary of the plan amendment package that the City of Clearwater has adopted for the department to review: • CPA2007-06003 - Amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater as adopted on May 18, 2000, as amended, including amendments to the Table of Contents, and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance iv umber 7993-08), based on the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). 9J-I 1.006(1)(a)4: The plan amendment was adopted on December 18, 2008. 9J- I 1.0060)(a)5: The proposed plan amendment package does not pertain to an area of critical state concern. 9J- I 1.006(l)(a)6: The plan amendment package is not within Orange, Lake or Seminole Counties. 9J-I1.006(l) a)7: The proposed plan amendment package is not an exemption to the twice- a-year limit of amendments, pursuant to Section 163.3191, F.S. (amendments based on the EAR). 9J- I 1.006(l)(a)7.h: The amendments adopted by Ordinance 8016-08/DCA No. 08-CIEIAR (Capital Improvements Element update) on November 18, 2008, have been incorporated as per Section 163.3187(1)(f), F.S. The ordinance is pursuant to the FY2008/09 City of Clearwater Operating and Capital Improvements Budget that was adopted on September 18, 2008. December 31, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 3 of 5 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.t.: 0 • With the adoption, changes are incorporated related to Ordinance 7950- 08/DCA No. 08-RWSP1 (incorporation of the Water Master Plan pursuant the regional water supply plan) that was adopted on September 18, 2008. 9J-1 1.0060)(a) The adopted EAR was sent to applicable review agencies (see attached copy of the 2006 letter sent to DCA with the list of review agencies that were sent the adopted EAR). 9J-11.006(l) a) 9: The plan amendment package was not adopted under a joint planning agreement. 9J-11.0060)(a 10: Sandra E. Herman Planner III P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Telephone: 727-562-4586 Fax: 727-5624865 sandra.herman@myclearwater.com If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman. Thank you for you help in this matter. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Director of Planning City of Clearwater December 31, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 4 of 5 December 31, 2008 Pinellas County Planning Department Attn: Brian Smith, AICP, Director 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Attn: Jessica White, Principal Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Attn: Ray Mazur, AICP, Planning Director 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Attn: Ms. Susan Harp R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street 1 liahassee, FL 32399-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Attn: Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Jim Quinn, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 1] Clearwater U RE: Transmittal of the Adopted City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan EAR Based Amendments CPA2007-06003 / Ordinance 7993-08 / DCA08-2AR To whom it may concern: Pursuant to Rule 9J-11.006(1) of the Florida Administrative Code, the City of Clearwater is submitting this adopted plan amendment package to the aforementioned organizations. December 31, 2008 Ray Eubanks Page 5 of 5 Also, enclosed is a copy of the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. If you need further assistance, please contact Sandra Herman, Planner III at 727-562-4586. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Sincerely, Michael De , A Director of Planning City of Clearwater Cc: David Healey, Pinellas Planning Council Tracy D. Suber, Educational Consultant Growth Management Liaison Office of Educational Facilities 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400 Telephone: 850-245-9312 CITY OF CLEARWATEE-R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr Ot:ria: Box 4748, CLPARIXIATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MrRrl.r Avrxcl:, Cuwoxrvn:R, FLORIDA 33756 1'rr,rPlw?r (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 I,ON!G R&jNC: PLANNING Drvia.oPmi NT Rivn:W September 28, 2006 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re: Transmittal of Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report - 2006 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Pursuant to F.S. 163.3191(2)(p)(6) please find attached three copies of the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Additionally please find three copies of the legal advertisement of the adoption hearing and three copies of the action agenda of the adoption hearing. The Clearwater Community Development Board, acting as the City's Local Planning Agency, held a public hearing on the draft EAR on September 19, 2006 and recommended approval to the Clearwater City Council. The Evaluation and Appraisal Report was adopted by the City of Clearwater after a public hearing was conducted by City Council on September 21, 2006 pursuant to Resolution 06-49. Copies o is correspondence, e adopted Evaluation an ppraisa Report, ana related attachments are being sent to the following agencies under separate cover on September 28, 2006: Pinellas County Planning Department; Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council; Southwest Florida Water Management District; Florida Department of State; Florida Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental Protection; Pinellas Planning Council; City of Belleair Beach; Town of Belleair; City of Safety Harbor; City of Largo; and City of Dunedin. FRANC IIIIM:%NII. \I.wnr. Iuua (k)RAN, 0 WNC.IOWNIMN I IM-1 I I ANUIXON. (:ui xi: 01011trr. HILL 1O >nN, (:1 nG\1\1.[:* ;\"A. I'i;'r NSI-X. COI-:N(A0IP:\119:R • • If you have any questions or need further information, please contact: Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4587 Fax: 727-562-4865 www. ing a.cla3lon(a?myclearwater.com The report remains available for public review at our offices between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. and will soon be posted on the City's website. Please advise me regarding the completeness of this adoption package. Sincerely yours, -r: Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director Attacbments • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r Orrlc:r: Box 4748, Cu:ARWA-rl?It, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPALSP.RVICGS I3un.nt?c, 100SourEr Myrt-ru,Avr•.xr;r:, CLIAKW,grErt, RoRmA 33756 I'r:Ll:Pnovl: (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG; RA\cr: PrnnvrN!(; Drvl?r.oPML\- r Rl:vu:w September 28, 2006 Brian K. Smith, Planning Director Pinellas County Planning Department 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Richard H. Kephart, Senior Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Lori H. Belangia, Planner 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Fred,---- ck P. Gaske, Dlr Gt tVr R A (;rav Rnilriina R.A. G"_a? t) 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Fl 323-99-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Lindy McDowell, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 City of Belleair Beach Reid Silverboard, City Manager 444 Causeway Boulevard Belleair Beach, FL 33786 Jrn,x UrCr,r:c.u.w;>uti'?< I lrrcr I I:??nl:rc,?. Cr>,'?ca,. ie?nrra: X(.r,\, E>nsb:K A. 1'r'il:RShx. 011 mm.:Nwmlwlu I?r.,I::u.l?>tru,isur:?'r:??uArrn:>r:?rn°!:Ac:'rR>x EMPLONFI," Town of Belleair 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Belleair, FL 33756 City of Safety Harbor Ron Rinzivillo 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 City of Largo Steven B. Stanton, City Manager 201 Highland Avenue Largo, FL 33779 John Lawrence, City Manager City of Dunedin Post Office Box 1348 Dunedin, FL 34697 RE: Transmittal of 2006 Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City of Clearwater To whom it may concern: Pursuant to F.S. 163.3191(2)(p)(6), the City of Clearwater is transmitting one copy of its adopted 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the aforementioned agencies. This packet also includes the legal advertisement of the adoption hearing, a copy of the action agenda of the adoption hearing; and the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. T-r If you nee' '- er assistance, please contact Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, at 727_56211587. Sincerely, t J ; C( , Michael L. Delk, AICP Director of Planning i ?.7 r' r?1 70 M ^ W U 0 01711 ecil kddn 1. car \ddn e requrequ 10 0 W M Q ? ? r- O Cl) U C'7 H J LL_ Q .. 2 ? H W F-- O Q L.L. ? Cx Q N w J QN U N lt7 O M n C) N :a- CQ O U U N lD O O_ 0 a) 0 fa a3 5, U O E L3 •? r cc J8wF- N N v CD r- 2 H W Cl) O N H l.() Lr) O %?o a U Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 m v ? ? c co w-- U ? d rn X N d c lJ.. ? CU ` N E rn r (O L ? U c m Y Q 16 0 Y ? x U ? d ? rn ? f2 LI7 LU 0 T M ;<D IJ M M ° . CD O 41 U 'r N r0 r O r O C7 1 f0 L U r () L 2 J o a) U a) 0 i` - Sot lbs. 'rTg labia. e B lbs. rt flews. Ither k$S and ram _ ...r9a. =900asr j „h.d oneeO Yes Drylce No had Oryrce9, UN 180.5 y9 oewaregat. [] Cargo Aircraft Only Dtngemi? po&rmc )wmiwbe shipped'm reds Decke9n& . 7 Payment Billto:,,,,«aadarsra rff- reditCard ? CashlCheck D Sender Recipient E] Third Party pcctNan / ?1 wID reaE.ncnNa oeaacndtra Total Packages Total Weight Total Declared Valuet t eRy onw300--rft eMj dthe_nFed&Servke Gu"ate "M dbgterrrstlwl r.r.i?ourFMay 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options ayouregu.ea ignawre,checkoheaorindlecc Indirect Signature No Signature Direct Signature 520 1 Requi as are?e vsge`nro?s -pens wen ?? at and track packages at fedex.com =tea 1 o?redy?hm aewen.4eevvres nannghbongaaaessney sgnwdem-y.Poe'Vpne Simplify your shipping. Manage your account Access all the tools you needre max. Bev. eem 1Ne6Part 11587 0199 2W6 FedEz.PRINrE9 IN U.SA SRY (P!:? tq- N N N N N cl? ? ? L r d 4+ D U d m 41 r? -FJ O C rU/a -n ±? O M E 4--r U iE• m v °' E v d °' C * 41 a s U3 ?E m ? n n rr A n y S w CD 0 A C A T S 12-3?-dFr r\, N nr _ US Airbill ob., 8665 5 0119 2431 ?CeS$ Numher "i ndpresshard Sender'sFedEx SENDER'S FEDEX ACCOUNT NUMBER ONLY AccountNumber ,tiers City of Clearwater dine Planning Department gmoany P.O. BOX 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 ddress 4 State ZIP - our Internal Billing Reference O P TI O N A L n24chmecters vvsitappearonknex . D ecipiem's I 1 ante On Mr. Ray Eubanks ;ecil Florida Department of Community Affairs F. l' Bureau of Local Planning dilcal Iddn 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 1fequ Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 • i _li u I r ' 0 2,0 0 1 1 4a Express Package Service Packages up to 150 ft dEx Priority OvemigM dEx Standard OvemigM FedEx Rrst Overnight Nertbusinessnmrrang.•Rday mdbusirress afternoon* E] Earliest nail business morning stapme vvi9ndde8vered an Mond ay andaY Delivery NOT evadable. de8uerymsekttlecadons• SATURDAY Delivery is selected. _ Saturday Delivery NOT available. Fe Ex 2Day FedEx Express Saver ? Sec end husiness dayy Thursday D Third business day.' shipnerdsviilibedelnared on Monday Saturday Delivery NOT available. _unlass SATURDAY Delivery a se. L FedEx Ememperemrwtava:lectedMi,mu chargm Onopoundrete. J •Tormelocatim¢ 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 150ft FedExlDaVdyey?ei hta FedExMayFre?M FedFx3DayFreigM ? sMp e a vess7bede a?Manday ? ?pm?mabeee?e aonhnnday ? SaturddayDe?livenNOTavaaaNe. uNess SATURDAY Delivery u selected. unless SATURDAY Delivery a selected. Coglorrarfirmadom ••To naa,locaaan: Packaging ? FedEx ? FedEx Pak" Ex ? FedEx ? Other Envelope' FedEx argePPaak.andFed6rsnuay ek Bo Tube •Deamredwabrelimitson 6 Special Handling r _ Include Fed& address in SectionI I ? SATURDAY Delivery HOLD Weekday HOLD S19Wrday NOTAvaileblefor ? at FedEx Location D at Fed ExLocabon ght NOTAvailablefor Available ONLY for &FnatOvemI Fad&&press WE. Rrn Overnight Fed& Pdmdy Ovemightend saver. WEx 30ay ight Fed&TDaymseleRlocetions Does this shipm contain dangerous goods? Onoboxl ustbechecked. -? ? No ? Yes ? Yes ? Drylce x k9 S'Mp r Deceleration. rlot eq clambon Ory me, g, ON 1845 Dangerous goods rmdu ryice) cannot be shipped in Fed& packaging. ? Cargo Aircraft only _ 7 Payment Bi11r to: ?????a?Q?d CrecritCard xn D Sender ? Recipient Third Party [] Cash/Check Acct No. in section 1 sva be billed. Fed&Acct Na Exp, CreditCerd Na -Dam Total Packages Total Weight Total Declared Valuet r0ur Iiabity is herded losing unless you declare a higher value.Sae tackler dens Byushg tlia Aid,?you agreemth service conditions ondm back of du Audit end in the current Fed& Service Guide, :Xg termsshatlurotour hablay. 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options If you require a sigrumre, check Direct or lndvect No and track cka es at Wet coin No Signature DmeaD$ign?tue „nadir?eStS?i?baawre 'Ship :. pa Required ? address may sign for ? rocipi aaddracsomeona ge may he 520 let Simplify your shipping: Manage your account Access all the tools you need. vvMrom obmmmga deliverykoeppli- atonsighbodrgaddressmay •„o„e,,,,,,,°o,; ;, ,,.,,a,,,,.-,„,........_.,..?...vs.?..- sgnamelerdetivery signkwdelnery.keeppliea Rev. Dent IWO6-Pam 15a2a1-Q1994-2006Fed&•PRINTED IN U.SA SRY FedEz Kinkds.,. Office and Print Center 529 S. FORT HARRISON AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33763 Location: CLWK Device ID: CLWK-POS1 Employee: 2030041 Transaction: 69027348354 • PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 866550192420 0.50 lb (S) 21.68 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 866550192442 0.50 lb (S) 18.57 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 866550192453 0.50 lb (S) 21.68 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 846995227000 0.50 lb (S) 18.57 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 846995226997 0.50 lb (S) 21.68 • PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 846995226986 0.50 lb (S) 18.57 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 866550192464 0.50 lb (S) 18.57 Shipment subtotal: 139.32 Total Due: 139.32 (V) CreditCard: 139.32 ************3204 m JIM" . US Airbill Trek FodEx Numher Express 5 5019 2464 ' -r PkeseP and P Data 2 l?aa( , CJ 9 Sender's FedEx r GEflt?rit 5 rf;ra','? t?GCO,Jty .I..'IY<4;LR ONLY A-- Kj-h. Sender's City of Clearwater Name Planning Department Company P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 State ZIP Your Internal Billing Reference OPTIONAL Fu 24 characters will appear on invoice. To Recipients Name Phone Company Southwest Water Mgmt District Recipients Ray Mazur, Planning Director Address 2379 Broad Street We cannot deliver to P.O. boxes or DeptlFloodSOnNRoom Address Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 To request a package be held at a specific FedE, location, prim FedEx address here. A 0 V !a Wress Package Service Packages up to 150lb& !i TI FedEx Priority Overnight FedEx Standard Overnight •rnday ? Naxtlmsme ftemoon' LLLLJJJJ 'l-busmessmammg FedEx first Overnight ? Eemest ne t b i . shipments MU be delivered on Monday Saturday Delivery NUT available. x us ness morning deiverymselectmcrui na• unless SATURDAY Delivery is selected. Saturday Delivery NOT available. FedEx'Day FedEx Express Saver Secandhusirress daµ•ThUrsday ? Third buamess day:' F] ay:' Thu shipments wi8 he d on MOMay Saturday Delivery NOT available. unless SATURDAY Dekvmy's selected. FedFz Fmoiope rate rwt available. Minimum charge: Dire-pwrd rata ---J •Tommf loeadan 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 150 1h& ? FedEx1Dex eiXt" ? FedFx2DayFreight Nedbusiness y." day SecoM busirlessday. Thursday ? FedEx3Da?Freight Thdbusiness ay." i shipments will be dernered on Monday shipments sag be delivered on Mmday ?Ness SATURDAY Delivery is selected. mime SATURDAY Delivery is selected. Saturday Defrvery NOT available. •CaOfwconfirmation: '•Tommtlacaewrs. 5 P kaging edEt ? FedEx Pak* ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other Envelope* Includes Fed& Small Pak, Box Fada Large Pak and WEx Sturdy Pak Tube • Declared value limit=.. 6 Special Handling F Include Fed ruldressin Section3 - SATURDAY Delivery HOLD Weekday ? NOT A il bl ? f t F dE L ti HOLD Saturday F ? M va a e or a e x oca on W&StarderdDeemight NOT Available for FedEs Brst Ovemi- fed&Express FedExlinc Overnight at ed ExLoc n Available ONLY for FedEx Pdorky0vemigrand SavegorfedEx3DayFreight oes this shipment contain dangerous goods? FedEx 2Dayto selectlocraims. Orrbm,-4bcch.cked. -? No ? Yes ? Yes ? Dry Ice A h d Shi r D l s per attac e ppe s ec aration Dry ice. %UN 1845 x kg Shippers Declareton. required ? C Dangemusgoods (icludingcry me)carmitbeshipped mWExpackaging argoAircraftOnly 7 Payment Bill arcerredExupa NamaedncerdNo Sender ci IeM Third Pa Credit Card Acct No. in OR P E] nY ? Cash/Check s i '" ect m be bill F. ExA-NO. Credit Card No. exg Data Total Packages TataIWeight Total Declared Valuet L 20 ? $ 1 `-ter .00 tow tiabibty'=r mStoo nless you declare a highervalue. See back MrdeMik Byusmg d. PXyou agree the I ssrrice condttre back ofthh Airbill and'mthecumentFedE Seryke Guide,includmg4mshatlmm our fwglity. _ _ 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options byou require a signature. checkf irectorlndirect ji d rop -o#f ocions aex.com Ignature Direct Sinature Indirect Si?nature egmred Somiacpa, Rno me is men bleat Packagddres,maysignfor reci pic rats address520 ifyyourshipping.aneyouaccount Access all het0olsyouneeo p dekyFeeepplies ane.:..,...?.,. ...,..,._.,, ,._..,,a.. ..... __... _..,?.. ...,.?._..., signature hxdelivery. signfordelivery reeapp;,- Rev. Date 108-Pan#158281-01934-2005 FedEx•PRINTED IN USA Say KIM Express ® USAirbill Tr?dg Number 846995226975 From r 17 M andpaa?na a ?/ Q Senders FedEx Date AccountNumber Senders Name City of Clearwater Planning Department Company P.O. Box 4748 Address Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 OaptyFloonStd[e/goam City state ZIP Your Internal Billing Reference OP T! O NA L Fmt24 characters 7 appear. mvaice. To Recipients Name _ Phone Company Mr. Brian K. Smith, Director Recipients Pinellas County Planning Department Address 600 Cleveland Street Suite 750 We cannon der rto P.O. boxes Dep?oar/SUitwRearn Clearwater, FL 33755 Address To request a package be held et a speck FedEx location, prim FedEx address here. By using this Airbill you agree to the service conditions on the back of this Airbill and in our current Service Guide, including terms that limitour liability. Questions? Visit our Web site at fedexcorn toy 0200 4a P- press Package Service Packages^1P ? ID 150?bs k d FedExPriorityOvernight ? FedEx Standard Overnight ' • asa ca ces ? FedExFirst Ovemight Neubuanesomomktg Ne#businessehemoon Wli.stnedblsiness morning deliverytaselectbcai ns' El FedEx2Day ? FedEcExpress Saver Sec21!!ess dry Third business day I- FedEzEnvelme me not available. Minimum charge: One-pound rato -U 4b Express Freight Service Packages overl5glbs To aa#kx:aeom ? FedFxlDZreight-' ? FedEx2DayFrei ht ? FedFx3DayFreight Nextbusiness ay Second business day Thud business day' • Cab for runfimstion: V 5 ckaging •DeNaredvaluebmh150D FedEx ? FedExPak* ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other Envelope* mchalasWE.SmabPak Box Tube FedEx Large Pak and FedFxStudy Pak 6 Special Handling I_ Inc4WaFearxad&-inSection a SATURDAYDeI' HOLD Weekd HOLD Saturday ? aNailableONLYf ? atFed ExLocabon ? atFed ExLocaeon WENPriom'yUvemlghiFedEx2Day. WAvailatdefer Available ONLY for Red. ID, keighyand Fadf3clDay FedEx Fim Ovemight FedFx Pdodry Ovamiggbl and freightto select ZIP codes fida ZOaYbsverod cati Does this shipment contain denggeroasgoods? U. I,- must be checked. No ? Yes El Yes El Dl!yylce As par attached Shippers Declaration Dry1ce,%UN1845 z kg Shippers Declaration iwtregwred Dangerous goods fincluding Dry Ice) canicube shipped in FedEx packaging. ? Cargo Aircraft Only 7 Payment Diiiia. Enter WExAg tNo. arCredhCard No.b I t Sender rty Cash/Check sAca No..wma ? Recipient E:1 Third Pa Credit Card [:1 be billed Fad&Acca No Exp, riedicad Na. Data Tote) Packages Total Weight Total Declared Valuet 1,5 $ p0 00 tour liabilityis limited toSlDO unless you declare a higher value. See back for details FedEx Use Only 8 Sign to Authorize Delivery Without a Signature By signing you authorize us to deliver this shipment without obtaining a signature and agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from any resulting claims 467 FedEC® USAirbill Tmrckng #99SP2k9`97 Express Number tc4 Mae,pvaandprassherd y /1 /4 , Sender's FedEx Data i y ? Account Number Senders Name City of Clearwater Planning Department Company P.O. Box 4748 Address Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Your Internal Billing Reference flr924 choremerova appear m immcu OPTIONAL I To Recipi Name Comp; Rawl Addre We cam Addre To-regm Ca Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Attn: Ms Susan Harp R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Fa"E` Trackmg 84 Number 6995226986 8 Sign to Authorize DeliveryWithout a Signature By using this AirbN you agree to the service conditions on the back ofthis AA M and in our current Service Guide, including terms that Writour liability. Questions? Visit our Web site at fedexcom or call 1.800.GoFedEx 1.860.463.3339. F*KiEX® USAirbill impress From Phrase P?+?andprass Sender'sFedEx r s s Package Service Packages up%1 arc locationa Ex Priority Overnight ? FedEx Standard Overnight ? FedEx First Overnight ;Zd Neubusimar mommg• Neubusimssmmmme Eadaat neuhusiness momkig der rymaetembaadena• ? FedEx2llay ? FedFxExpressSaver semndbusiness day' Third husmess day f FedExE---ram motmm able. Minimum shame: Onr.mund rate -? 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 150lbs. '"Ta ce>T k7 ? FedExIDayFreight* ? FedEx2DayFreiQM ? FedEx3Da?Freight Nmubusinees ay Second husbass dey'r Third business ay Dom Trial Packages Total Weight Total Dedared Valuot l CX-C, $ W .t0 tour fiab0ity is limited to $100 unless you declare a highervalue. See backfordeteils FedFx Use Only Sender's ' Name City of Clearwater Planning Department Company P Box 4748 Address Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 DepVrroorlShdeaMomh City State ZIP Your Internal Billing Reference a PTI O N A t Fit 24 than mere via appear m -ce. To Re Na L- Mr. David Healey, AICP Re Executive Director We Pinellas Planning Council, Suite 850 At 600 Cleveland Street To Clearwater, FL 33755 Ch moon 467 Fern, JOW 0200 - 4' _ t ress Package Service 7 Packages op m 1bd lbs. Y? amt laeedw e d.ExPrii rity Overnight p m • ? FedEx Standard Overnight • FedEx First OvemigM us hess rtum g Neuhusm¢ss ahemaon Fsraestrrett busnressmorMng deeveryto Belem bceaons• ? FedEx May ? FedEx Express Saver saamdauso,easaay Thirdmrsmessdey L- FedEx Fmelope rate nmavalade. Mininam chame:Ona-pound rate -? 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 1501htc ••Tonombrad- ? FedExIDayFreighta' ? ttd 2x Day Freight ? FedEx May Freight NW bodressddeavv""•• Second busmosadsaayy`` Third business ay •Caa for Confmneaor ckaging Declares vane 0ma$00 FedEx ? FedExPaka ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other Envelope* NlrcUd duLargePakandFedExSo*Pak Box Tube 6 Special Handling Include Fedbt.ddrest in Ssd-l _ SATIRIDAYDdilery HOLD Weekday HOLDSaturday ? AvailebaeOHLYIor ? atfedExtncaton ? atFedExLo'Zn Fe d. Pdm?ryOvernight Fad Ex. NOTAvailablef. Available ONLY for Fed&1 Fa I IWEx lDaY FadEx Firm 0-ight F¢dEx Prbrily Overnigght and Fmightto selast ZIP codes FedExtDaymsek:ctbceems Does this shipment contain donggerous goods? Oae box mltet be thttit? No El Yes El Yes -. 1:1 Drryylce Asyer atlacned SNpp¢rs Oeclaraam Drylc0.9, UN teas x kQ Shippers Dedarefion not required Dangerous goods (includmg Dry Ice) cannot be shipped in FWEx packaging. ? Cargo Aircraft Only 7 Payment Dints: Enter Rd&Acct No. or Cradht Card No. had E] Sender ? Rectpierd Ara Sender El Third Party Cred C ra d ? Cash/Check will he filed. peda Cma card ca NO Na Dem Total kages Total Weight Total DDWarredValuet li '5 $ lka? DD tour liability is limited to $100 unless you declare a higher value. See back for details FedEv Use Only 8 Sign to Authorize Delivery Without a Signature By using this Airbill you agree to the service conditions on the back of Nis Airbill and in our current Service Guide, including am nsthatlimh our liability. Questions? Visit our Web site at fedexcom _ 6 Special Handling i a ch de radrz address irrSeceonl ? SATLRtDAYDe8lrety HOLD Weekday Av il bka ONLYt r ? t F dE L o HOLD Saturday I b ? t F d E n a a x oca on a e WEx Pdodty OverrZFed&Mry, NOTAvailablefor on a e x ACa Available ONLY for RM191Inay arM FedFx2Day FedEs FirstUvemight - Fraightan a. LP codes FedEx Pdadty orem?gpMand Fed Fx20eymseumlocetiau this shipment contain donppemus oodg, Otx Feu maA be ehxked No ? Yes ? Yes r a h d Shi D l ? Dr? Ice - are en adec e ppe s ec WDeclared. not mquked ory ca,%UN 1845 x kg Dangerous go.&fmchdmg Drylceiaemmt be shipped in FedEa packaging. Cargo Aircraft Only 7 Payment sin to. ^ FmerFedEx acct. Na or Cm& Card Nm E] Sender ? Recipient El Third Party 1. 01 s t Credit Card E] Cash/Check 0 ec . be baled. .seam Confirmation Dap UAoorlSu orn 5 Plickaging •DeclamdvekmfmkW FedEx ? FedEx Pak" ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other Envelope" FmeddEEYlergooPakk,endkd&SeadyPak Box Tube By signing you authorize us to deliver this shipment without obaining a signature and agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from any resulting claims. Rev. Date l l/N•Pan 1159261.01994-2003 Fedb-PRINTED IN USA MWIA 04 By signing you authorize us to deliver this shipmern; omobtaining a signature and agree to indemnity and hold us henntess from any resulting claims. 467 Express US Airbil! Trek B W99SPP7000 {?-??a/?/n Number I ? Senders FedFx Data Account Number Senders City of Clearwater Name Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Company Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Address DeptiAoodSdMaoom City State ZIP I Your Internal Billing Reference Fist N characters wit appear on imoica. OPTIONAL 3 To Recipie Name Florida Dept. of Transportation District 7 lomPa Attn: Carol Collins Recipie 11201 North McKinley Drive cann We canncann We Mail Station 7-500 Addra; Tampa, FL 33612-6456 To revue: „it or r 4 r tun . ir • . ; 9x7 ` -. By using this Airbill you agree to the service conditions on the back afthiisAirMll and in our current Service Guide, including terms that limit our riabTdy. Questions? Visit our Web site at fedexcom or call 1.800.GoFedEx 1.8011463.3339. F'. ® US Airbill NumF*dEx Tracli b a Express 8665 5019 2453 From Please aMpe}t 1 /] Sender'sFedEx ecwnco a crnrv n^rosr u? NUMBER ONLY 6"C) Data V-' Sender's City of Clearwater Name Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Company Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Address Dept/AOOr/Subr./NOOm State ZIP Your Internal Billing Reference First 24 charecmrswi9 appear an miccce, OPTIONAL To Recipir Name Compa Department of Environmental Protection Recipir Attn: Jim Quinn, Environmental Manager Adore: Office of Intergovernmental Progrms We term 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. Mail Station 47 Addis c, Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 CO r+ 4a Express Package Service Packages ? ro 15o?bx m? FedEx Priority 0vemight ? FedEx Standard Overnight • • ? FedE First Overnight 2, NextIs__momug NaMbusiness ehemaon Earlmarrmdorsiness dBFNerym6amdmt8dan5• El FedEx2Day ? Fedu press Saver Secant business day Third business day' L- FedEx Envelope rare net av fable. Minimum theme: Orm-round rate -J 4b Express Freight Service Packaga?over l5olbx Te mmtlacai ? FedFx1DayFreight* ? FedEx2DayFreiyht E] FedEx May Freight Nadbusmess ay" Sacmdausmess" Third MUmea oy- •Ce9furCordi madon: 5 packaging DaalamdeaMalack $500 ?FedEx ? FedExPak* ? FedEx [I FedFx ? Other Envelope* mcludesFad EicSmaOPak Box Tube FedFx Large Pak and FedEx Study Pak 6 Special Handling F - Include West dch- „,Section a I SATURDAYDerruery HOLD Weekday HOLD Saturday ? AvaRableONLYfar ? atFed FxLocation ? atFed ExLocahon FedExPrki DomightFedEx2Day, NOTAvailabfofor Available ONLY for FadEx IDaykerghx and FedEx2Day FadD First overnight Fed Ex Priority PremryryMend Frelgtamcelact DP codes Fed&blsymselecllocedun l1lonst; this shipment contain dangerous goads? One box mrsibe daeksa r%jA D E] Asap renarAed ? Shippers Decmredal ? Drylca, 9, UN 1849 x 18 Shippers Ded .n rrotreq..it Dangerous goods[ecluding Dry Ice) canrwtbe shipped in FedEx packaging. ? Cargo Aircraft Only 7 Payment B%II Fae.FaaExnapcNoorrxaancmdxo?ne1og Ir/I ? Sender ? Recipient ? Third Party W V'editCard ? Cash/Check Acet No Section t wi be hied FeBxA,d Na Ep. CzeakCara Na DData Total Packages Total Weight Total ?Da? delre'?d Valuet I C) . s $ LV .00 t0urfiabilhyis limited tu5100 unless you declare a highervalue. See backfur details. NdEx Use Only 8 Sign to Authorize Delivery Without a Signature By signing you authorize us to deliver this shipmentwithom obtaining a signature and agree to indemnity and hold us harmless from any resulting claims. 467 Rev. Oere 11103•PW 1150181•®7 7003 Fail PRINTED IN USA Will ed PG 4 0200 ` t Fr 4a Ex Tess Package Service Packages up to 150 lbs. dEx Priority Overnight lllIIIJJJJJJ Nmd md buvrress mwn ng'Fdday FedEx Standard Overnight ? Nez business aaemaon' FedFx First Overnight ? E di rt n b shipnemtwi0lre delivered on Monday Saturday DeMery NOT-table. a e ne us ness momug deharymselectlocations• unless SATURDAYDefiveryisselecfed. Saturday Delivery NOT available. FedEx May S .m . nes daayy ma sw ay ? FedEx Express Saver ? Tba h ush asa aay 7 . ship del'v == mertmwill he M onday Sa turdayD elivery NOTavaiIahle. mdess SATURDAYDefivery'a selected L FadEx Envelope ram not available. Minimum charge: One-pound rata. 'Temostlicadan 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 150 tbs. ? FedEx1DayFr1ht' Ne xtbusiness ay." day ? FedEx Way Fre?ht Second business aeyy. Thursday Freight ? FedEx3Dayay Third business " shipmems"Ibedelimned on Monday sMpmems vvip be it red on Monday . Saturday Delivery NOT available. urdess SATURDAY Delivery oselected unless SATURDAY Delivery 's seleced. •CeAf irconfirmatian: ••Tomostlaaadoi 5' ckaging FedEx ? FedExPak* ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other Envelope" mcwdeaFee Exsmanpak Box Tube Fed& Large Pak ant FedEc Sturdy Pak • Declared value frmt$50D. 6 Special Handling _ r . McladaFm1Exaddmaainsagtian3 -? SATURDAY Delivery HOLD Weekday ? NOT Available for ? at FedEx Location HOLD Saturday ? atFed FxLocaton W& Staneere Overnight NOT Available for Fedrx First Overnight. it. Express FedEx Few Overnight - Available ONLY for FedEx Priority DwmigM and Saver, or FedEx 30sy Freight FedEx20ayWaaIW oca6omr. Does this shipment contain dangerous goods? - One box must bo checked. r No ? Yes s ? Yes ? Dry Ice As per aaached Shippers Declarabon Shippers0eclaredon. rat required Dangerous goodsf'mWdmg dry me) cannot be snipped in Fedrx packaging. x Dry oe.9, UN 1985 kg ? Cargo Aircraft Only 7 Payment B%II?_ Enter redEx Acct, Na. or Credit Carl No, in ? Sender El Recipient ? ThirdParty ?d de Credi[Card F] Cash/Check Section 1'wD be heed FedEsAcd W. Exp. Credit Card No Data Toil Packages Trial Weight Total Declared Valuet - ( 05 $ V 00 towliebiliry6FiiNmd m SlnD unless you declare a higher value. See back for details. By using Lida Airdn you apt tutle service cmdmom on the back of rids Aunt and in the current FedEx Service Guide, including lama that Rare our 9abaM. 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options it you require a slgnahrre, check Direct or meirecr Schedule aupiekup at fetlex.com a Signature Direct Sig nature Indirect Si nature e cared samemeetreciplarte mea avahe a ` Pae'"r aybeleR ? addressmeysgpitar ? nx reripier address, someone 520 .Simpl"riy your shipping. Manage your account. Access all the tools you need.`, ?3 wmaa aMamnBa ?ry.keaP?r1e a anarenbanngaadm==may .x:.a.+.:...,:.........:..?e..-....,-`.....s,.,.v..?..?.........,.._.5,....r.. ....,.,&.w.?.n...+r - ...-.. a....?.?.... ??..+.,r- - uptercne I. delivery. sign for deny kr appicx ¦ ® USAirbill T?9 865 501,9 2442 Express Number tS^,Meese pint erd pm. bard F d E S d r 7F? / / \V to en e s e x SENDER'S FEDEX ACCOUNT WO-MBER ONLY Account Number Imefs Ime City of Clearwater Planning Department mpany P.O. Box 4748 . Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Idress Depunaarrsaae,Raan Y State ZIP fur Internal Billing Reference D P Ti O N AL t24 charectus it appear on bvoice. cipierd': Ime mpanY Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council res dress dress Attn: Jessica White, Principal Planner cannot rh 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard-, Suite 100 dQertsa Pinellas Park, FL 33782 7 - at! DK 1 , , 1 4a 10ress Package Service Packages up to 150lbs. Fx Priority Overnight FedEx Standard Overnight FedEx First Overnight ? Next bus ness ehemoon ? Eedies rett bus ress mom n LL Nazi E,x mom n F da g B y ship X.n be delivered on Mond ay Seum1ay Def ryNOT-i1.1ble. ddiverytoacka bcadom.• unless SATURDAY Oak is seleemd. Saturday Dervery NOT mrsit e. FedEx 2Day FedEx Express Saver ? Second hunness dayy.•Thusday ? Third business day.• Saturda NOTmilabte shi o ab d r d M l Defr pmen w e e vere on a ay y y . ass sATUflonr Defry seleced. 1-- FedE Evelepa rem rrotavatlahie. Minimum charge: floe-pound rem. J •Termnloafi¢m. 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 159 ft ? FedEx 1 Dar FreV ? FedEx 2Day ke?M ? FedEx May, Freight Nert brsirress ay.« ay' Sed Witness ley. Thursday Third business ay.« shipments we be delivered on Malay shipments vdtl be delivered on Monday SaturdayD r MNOTavadable. urdess SATURDAY Delivery is selected.. udess SATURDAYDervery is selected. .Cal for Cordi"on: «Tomentlecatian kaging FedEx ? FedFx Pak* ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other =+ n Envelope. IndWesredEaS-11Pak Box Tube FedE Lar e Pak and FedE Sturd Pak • Z g y Oeclered value limk3509. 6 Special Handling Include FedEx address in Section 3 w SATURDAY Delivery HOLD Weekday HOLD Saturday ? atFed Exlncation ? atFed ExLocabon ? NOT il bl f o a Ava e or W&Smnded0vamigM, NOT Available for Available ONLY for FedE Rrst Overnight, VEx Epress Fed.RrnOvemight W Pdafty O.mmightand { o FedEx3Day Freight Fed EtDayto select bcericns. a this shipment contain dangerous goods? One hoz muss ho checked. / N. ? Yes ? Yes ? ZVice a As per'e bed ShiDPey Declaration Oryma, 9, UN 1845 kg Shippers Decimal.. rm[required. Ai ft O l ? C m p argo rcra n y Dangerous goods Grckding dry ice) cannot be shipped in FedEa packaging. 7 Payment Bilito: F Enter FedFx Acct, NO.aCredh Card No. hel ? Sender ? Recipient El Third Parry Credit Card E] Cash/Check Acct No in . Section 1 wD be billed. fad&Am No. Ey. Cre&tCad No. Doe Total Packages Total l Neighj Total Declared Value. ? sLp - I S .00 $ tour liability is fnn red to $100 unless you declare a higWrvalue.Sea back for deters. By using this Airbtll you agree as the service conditions on the beck althisAiMll and in the cumamFadE Service Guide, including terms ft limit our liability.. ?? 'Store your addresses at fedexcom - 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options nyoumquimosigre m.check0imaorlrt6rett oSignature DirectSignature Indirect bl ture arre bln a • ` i M e co t `A e ll the t l o d Si lif hi a4 e add-e ign for nti ones eve a Re wired may sign for ? y eas, PadQiagemg be left ? edd 520 pp anag your ac uLr cc ss a oo s y u nee . s . mp y your s ng. F at . neighboring .Feaappliex a e eghWmn may gaddress wtlaldabtahmila leftyn T 1-- -_ I signeWre he delivery signior defry lea appl Ree, Dete lQM6•Part/ISMI.01994-x106FedE•PRINTED IN U.SA SRY ® USAirbi// Nu?6B 8665 5019 2420 ? I f t 0200 ?t. Express .1 m Pleaeepimandpessha d. 4a ress Package Service Packages up to 1501bs. SendersFedEx / Dc -p- t SENDER'S FEDEX ACCOUNT NUMBER ONLY Account Number dExPriority0vemight FedEx Standard Overnight FedEx First Overnight ? Nertirmiressaaernom• ? Fadiestrregbisinessmoming Nmabusinessmomm •Frida I g. y shipments will be delivered on Monday Saft"ay Delivery NOT available. deliv¢ry..kmtocadons.- urdessSATURDAY Delivery is selected. Saturday Delivery NOT available. dens le City of Clearwater 1 FedEx2D FedEx Express Saver E] Second hunnay ese day. Thursday ? Third business day.. shipmentsllbedelrvered an Monday Saturday Delivery NOT available. Planning Department uNeFe SATURDAY Delivery is seled ? r¢dEEw¢Iooamtunma?aRaNctea.Mimmem¢harg¢:Dn¢-paa,drae. ---J -Tommtlocatbsm? lpany P.O. Box 4748 4b ExpressFreightService Packages am1W'ft * FedEx20ayFre!q FedEX3Day Freight FedExlDa Frei ht da y Thursday ? rdhus nes ? Sec Next trumor -bey« ? Clearwater FL 33758-4748 atents 0 be . e s hip, rmed Monday veryNOT available. car Monday SeturdayDeWery N l l re del shipmentsR URW less ? un iv is ess SATUR DAY Delivery ry is e .0. SATURDAY De D. fry is a selected. unless SA selected. Deptli'too Suit JRoom •Caltaconfirmetion: «Tanmrhreaom. 5 ckaging State ZIP FedEx ? FedEx Pak* ? FedEx ? FedEx ? Other n Envelope* Includes Fed&Small Pak. Box Tube FedEx Large Pak and FedE Sturdy Pak • a Ir Internal Billing Reference OPTIONAL Declartd value lknaQOD. 4chereaerssvaappearorivdce. 6 Special Handling Include FedEa address in Section 3. -? h ? SATURDAY Delivery HOLD Weekday HOLD Saturday ? ? c atF-edExLocation NOTAvailablefor atFed FxLocabon Fad. sraneareoaarmght NOT Available for Available ONLY for Fed. RrstOv¢might Fed. Eq.ren FedERist Overnight. FedEPdordy Dvenei9htsnd o - Be.,. or FadE. May Freight Feda WaYmselectlocati n, b tiesthis shipment contain dangerous goods? Tracy D. Suber, Educational Consultant - One box must be checked. ND ? Yes r-1 Yes E] Dry Ice Asper aeachad SlhPpel,restion Dry ice, 9. UN 7645 x kg = m Growth Management Liasion m shipcer De¢lereWn rmtmqu Dangerous goods (including dry icel cannot be shipped in FedEx packaging. E] Cargo Aircraft Only p Office of Educational Facilities l 7 Payment Bic-? Eller FedEx pact Na ne Credit Card N bel a y ? ? Sender ? Recipient ? Third Party Cred tCold Cash/Check 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1014 socloorl" be Isted FL 32399-0400 Tallahassee . Cab„ , Total Packages TotalWeigM Total DeclaredValuet r -;l, S $ .DO he ou Wb fvoitud to film unlassywdeclareehighervelue. See hackfordaails. t? arthan ty. home t ServiceGuide, meluaging diigtemstlatfvrvlounimbi liability. sernra ' cordonW badoldraAkbillam. cunen[FedE 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options ayoumgaheasgnaoae.¢ne¢koiree ahw ¢t ??. Find drop off locations at.#edex.com Re'g ? redmre Direct Signature Indirect SiQQnature S reaprerrt's a nti asre s avadaNe n i f i d' dd ? dd 520 S Simplifyyourshippmg Manageyour account Access all the tools,yoti need • olo mY rass mays go a rec pia sa resesomearre Packagam Wleh a Ealrvery Fee apphas na neighboring address may wnhav amamm 1 i..._....,>..... :.......w... ;?.rt'? l signara etadebvery. signladelivery Fee applies 11/19/2008 10f :16 8504883309 COMM PLANNING PAGE 01/04 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST THOMAS G. PELHAM Govornar Secretary S,,? Ae- To: From: 1/ Fax #: 72- Phone #: Return Fax # / Email: Date: (! # of Pages: Message: Please call at if you have questions. 2 C? Vas (including cover page) ?u.r r e- t s vi ?.;q -c? ?a ?tel?1-6 b? a 3 e,4 e-t S aA--? e>,:?.6L?l le Facsimile Transmittal Cover Shoot f 411 ?.vt 1- Division/Unit: ?. 6 ?t 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 82899-2100 Phone: 850-48$-8488 Webalte: www.dca staLe.. _ 11/19/2008 10:16 85048833 COMM PLANNING • PAGE 03/04 Pro Projected Level of Service Deficiencies 2009-2013 Water/Sewer Level of Service - , ?.....a a r .a 17$.5 Note; These numbers utilize the po ulati f 175.2 172.Q p on or the en treatment capacity of the City's water treatment plants tire service i 39 area. The total capacity of the City's wastewater treatment plants is 13.7 s .367 MGD. MGD. The total Projected Trans ortation Le l f ve o Service '?Ti???fi' li:>Eait ?"? ?y.,c;,,?, ?:.?../??'a1' •?:.;;>,:' ...,,::.z:••-;:;:.';. .• '?ti .• f ?T; :i:lSb 9}'° il,J:::?:, ,::H< °y n h?.. VU . `??n1 , •'rr I tG b4 l , . :. tans :,. ?`: ' 1:?, ,, . z C ress Gardens Blvd D C C C. . ..::• • State Road 542 C D Dundee Rd D D D D D E State Road 544 LUcerne Park Rd D D E F F State Road 655 F ReckarHw D C C C C US Highway 17 C 3r' St, SW; 6'h ~St N D C C- C D D US Hi hwa 27 C B g uS Hi hwa 92 D B l3 C Count Raad 653 D C C C C C did t,ucerne Park Road D C C C C C Thom son Nurse Road D G C D FF= C D D C C C c 11/19/2008 10:16 8504883309 COMM PLANNING • Capital Improvements Schedule Supporting Population Projections *Estimated PAGE 02/04 Population projections are from the Water Supply Plan adopted by the Winter Haven City Commission on June 9, 2008. v m tr m - d IL Recreation Level of Servlce, -- - - - ?_ _ -- - `:;2010`= -- - ?- _? `4? ; . 2053 , z':: : IV?cit?berA: r3- r- - tltrrftlier- s 7..: Yj?y{ti -N u 'fie do' _ ?.,:t::lulu ?er•. >Z _M, =?_r- pg•, •af.':..?= v? , Vs, krona! . - .,.- ; . _... -,:.>_...!1?_:..:.:..-? :.....,-:r,- - - ?,?:-:=?:=-'Lt?$.'°?•- - :_-.??..?-_ :?=•:,::r?• . - l: ?. - :.-'?,. - _ - - - '-?S • - ' - r?? - • Vii'-: "r,Y - - Q_ _ - ..? Fact I. _ - _ - '`?ciirt?es?; ; _ -:`._ :: ?F?ic -:; ": ":? .:.-.: • :. 37 G? 37,065 - -;; 35,739 36.471 38,241 00 Pa elation 15 9!2,471 15 11251Q i5 112548 Nei boftodPa* 115 000 13 112,749 14 112 605 Community 1115.000 3 1111,913 4 1 18.118 5 1 17,413 5 1 17,631 5 1/ 7,fi48 • Park 1 13.574 12 1 13,039 12 1 ! 3,089 12 i 13,138 92 1 J 3.987 Pla rounds 1 12 500 10 Baseball 115,000 16 112,234 96 112,279 21 1 t 1,7fi5 21 111,793 21 1 ! 1,821 H 115, z Field zz Softball Field 1 1 5,000 19 113,249 11 113,316 11 1 3,370 11 113,423 11 1 / 3,476 116,000 7 115,106 10 113,647 13 112,851 13 112,897 13 112,942 J o- 1=ootbaltl 2 Soccer f=ield 111.373 29 111,298 29 111319 o 0 Tennis Court 112,000 ll 113.249 27 J .. 1 f 1,359 -27 0 Basketball 1 1 5,000 10 113,574 10 1 1 3.647 10 113,707 _ 12 113,138 12 113,187 Court _ --- - -- T __ Shuffleboard 1'/ 3,600 24 111.489 24 1 11,520 , 24 111,544 24 1/1.589 24 111,593 Court Racquetball 1110,000 6 115,957 6 116,079 6 1 16,178 6 116,276 6 1 16,374 Court 1137,065 1 1 137 656 i 1138241 f Golf Course 11100,000 1 11 35,739 1 1136471 1 118,828 2 1119,129 Swimming 1125,000 2 1117,870 2 1118,236 2 1!18,533 2 1118,828 Pool $oat Rams 1 d 5,004 11 113 249 11 1 t 3,316 12 1 13 089 12 1 ! 3 138 12 1 13 8 m• "Per resident , m m m m v m CD CD CD m N ri - t 11/19f2008 10:21 85048833 COMM PLANNING • PAGE 01/05 t STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE GRIST THOMAS C% PELHAM Governor SBF fury Facsimile Transmittal Cover Sheet Division/Unit: To: Fax #: ? 2- ? - SZa 2- • qkf From: Phone #: Return Fax # Email: Date: # of Pages: (including cover page) Message: Please call at if you have questions. r n.o4AA-e ? 2565 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850-4$8-8486 Website: www.ds9,6tste.}I.us LO m ' m V PaakHour CrcreantYear DssignYear2oDO DaslpnYear]814 Damp Year281t DwanYear2012 UBngth 400, cE sendce iAFa LOS Pack Hour CameM tatric Koh RDADWAY tames) Lave YO]uma Counts 12808} LOS Peak HOUrTrips L06 peaktieurTeips 106 Peak MOUrT s LOS AeAHourntps U D PAL it ODAST PARbtWAY i1 } t.2 1258 B 1304 $ 1358 a? 2 2034 D 1,186 B 2940 O1d15npsR°adLO Fforlda Patk DciNe H Z z d J CL E O U m0 m m CD Go v co u7 00 aq 04 Go m m N m c-i s-i - s - u? N m Q d "paste: 4MMOD8 2 H z z Q J IL ?-? tg V V f - °'! m m m m m L0 m o4 N m m m m N I- Ol a--1 a--1 1 2DATED CITY OF PALM COAST TRAFFIC PROD ECTIONS • 2008-2012 u? m m w c? Q CL Pesk Hna Lapgtli Ho-of Sallee oolY (mitesl lanes Volume JLnR No. D 3810 BM1, TemspmrlawWk.;FV 7le?aIDnj.- j 1A ( 1 D?TEg- Capedbs gamed onFDOT 2088 Ouel%d AIM of 6arvice HmKlbook {Tebbe d 6y HM c Not APp14W8 _ • z z Z Q J D_ O U m m m OD m v to CC) ri N 00 CD N Q1 a-i e-I a-i CurranlYear Ounartt DeslgnYear Y06B Pea?EHour l[S$ Dounw. (Mai PeaktloarrTt9pa U PKI 567 Dael8pYsar2018 DmslgwYear2oll PeakHwrTdps LOS PeekHourUps L Design Yemr 2012 PoakHourTAps U 11/19/2008 10:21 8504883309 Pal COMM PLANNING Coast Main Arteri PAGE 05/05 (Z) Fe9kp ??tt? ????puuunrr?.uuu.nnrr Yrli•20068012y ¦.rr-rw.rr--r.. R0908??9Ilus as on r r Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:01 PM To: Porter, Catherine Subject: RE: Planning Horizon - 2018 called Scott - very nice by the way - and he said they do not project for cities, actually only for counties and they would be estimates every five years (based on 2000 census). I ran the 2020-2015 x 3/5 estimate by him for 2018 and he said that made common sense to him. He said with amount of error of census, etc. and going out that far into the future, a community knows their population trends. He said that it sounds like a good way to estimate it. So (2020) 121,352 - (2015) 118,041 = 3311 x 3/5 =.1986.6 + 118,041 = 120,028 (rounded off). Does this sound correct to you? Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Porter, Catherine Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:58 AM To: Herman, Sandra Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Planning Horizon - 2018 If 2018 is ok with Gina, let's use methodology we discussed. Ok to check with Scott Cody: 352-392-0171 x337 -----Original Message----- From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Wednesda [Porter, Catherine] - y, November 19, 2008 10:02 AM [Porter, Catherine] [Porter, Catherine] [Porter, Catherine] To: Clayton, Gina; Porter, Catherine Subject: Planning Horizon - 2018 Gina, Cathy, Recall that we discussed what year to use as our comp plan "planning horizon" as being required by DCA - we three discussed either 2018 or 2020. 1 believe we decided on 2018 intially. As mentioned in the ORC report, ch. 163 says 5 or 10 years (min.) for planning periods of comp plan, so I am recommending that we go with 2018 for 10 years from this current comp plan adoption year (2008). We can note our other master plans (infrastructure) have different horizons, such as 2020 for Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste and Storm Water. Water is 2018. MPO's LRP has a current horizon of 2025. Population estimates tend to be based on the Census decade studies - 2000, 2010, 2020, etc. Lauren ran it by a friend that is a consultant who works on comp plans in Fla. and she suggested to use the 2018 (10 year) horizon as appropriate based on her experience. [Porter, Catherine] - I will prepare a sentence in the FLUE introduction and/or needs summary that explains our planning horizon with the adoption of ordinance #7993-08. And I'll work with Jim H. to change the the FLU map to 2018 and to add a line about the City's Comprehensive Plan Planning Horizon of 2018 on the other maps. Wanted to run it by you two first. Sandy Sandra E. Herman Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 PO Box 4748, 33758-4748 Telephone: (727) 562-4586 Fax: (727) 562-4865 sandro.herman@myclearwater.com Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 11:29 AM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: Amendment 08-2AR - ORC report Valerie, Good morning. We left you a voice mail earlier. Please call us about the ORC issues. Catherine W. Porter, AICP: 727-562-4626 or Sandra Herman: 727-562-4586 One of the things we would like to discuss with you is concerning the following (from ORC report): C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT: 7. Lack of Potable Water Supply Concurrency: The Capital Improvements Element does not address the requirements of Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., pertaining to water supply concurrency which requires the following: that adequate water supplies be in place and available to serve new development no later than the issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; and that prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the local government shall consult with the applicable water supplier to determine whether adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance by the local government of a certificate of cccupancy or. its functional equivalent. DCA Recommendation: Revise the amendment to include a policy to ensure that the applicable water supplier is consulted prior to the issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent to ensure potable water supply will be available prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy as required by Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S. Please refer to CIE Objective 1. 1.3 (old objective 32.3) and policies 1.1.3.1 through 1.1.3.7 (new numbering), see in particular policy 1.1.3.2, that requires the City to determine "prior to the issuance of development orders, whether sufficient capacity of essential public facilities to meet the minimum standards for levels of service for the existing population and a proposed development will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development". Further, Policy 1.1.3.3.1. requires the developer to have the necessary facilities in place as per a development order or an enforceable development agreement. The development orders/agreements are required prior to building permits or certificates of occupancy. This is more restrictive than requiring it prior to a building permit or certificate of occupancy. Please call either Catherine or me to update on the ORC issues. Thank you. Sandy Herman 1 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Governor The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard: THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary F7 FEE 4 November 10, 2008 I i NOV PLNNN DEEVELCPMENT E?'';•'iCE? i -:= CLEARWATER The Department has completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of Clearwater (DCA Number 08-2AR), which was received on September 11, 2008. Based on Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we have prepared the attached report, which outlines the Department's findings concerning the amendment. It is particularly important that the City address the objections set forth in our review report so that these issues can be successfully resolved prior to the adoption of the amendment. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. Within the next 120 days, the City should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. The proposed Amendment (DCA Number 08-2AR) is an update to the comprehensive plan based on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). In general, the issues identified in this Objections Recommendations, and Comments Report relate to the potential to increase residential density within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the lack of a planning timeframe, concurrency management policies, capital improvements planning, and further clarification of the affordable housing provisions. Our report includes recommendations to help the City in addressing these issues prior to the adoption. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) ? 850-921-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state.f1.us • COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2356(p) 850-488-3309(f) • FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST 850-922-2207(p) 850-921-1747(f) • HOUSING. AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-488-7956(p) 850-922-5623(f) • The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard November 10, 2008 Page Two • We are available to assist the City in responding to our report. Please contact Valerie Jenkins, Senior Planner, at (850) 922-1803, if we may be of further assistance in the matter. Sincerely, Charles Gauthier, AICP Director, Division of Community Planning CG/vj Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Review Agency Comments cc:. Sandra E. Herman, Planner II, City of Clearwater Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this report, the City has 120 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3189(2)(a), F.S. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the City must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendment, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the-Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event no names, addresses are provided, please provide this information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. 0 0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 08-2ARA November 10, 2008 Division of Community Planning Office of Comprehensive Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-11.0 10, F.A.C. 0 0 INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the City of Clearwater's proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan (DCA Number 08-2AR) pursuant to Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objections. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. Each of these objections must be addressed by the local government and corrected when the amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections, which are not addressed, may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items, which the local government considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its non- applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments, which follow the objections and recommendations section, are advisory in nature and will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. 0 0 OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AMENDMENT 08-2AR 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163, PART II, FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.), AND RULE 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.) The City's proposed Amendment 08-2AR is the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based plan amendments to update the Comprehensive Plan. The Department raises the following objections and comments to proposed Amendment 08-2AR. OBJECTIONS: A. Future Land Use Element: I . Lack of Planning Timeframe: The Future Land Use Map does not indicate the future timeframe for which it is intended consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. Section 163.3177(5)(a), F.S., requires that comprehensive plans include at least two planning periods, one covering at least the first 5-year period occurring after the plan's adoption and one covering at least a 10-year period. [Section 163.3177(5)(a), (6)(a); and Rules 9J-5.005(4), F.A.C.] Recommendation: Include with the amendment a Future Land Use Map with the future timeframe for which it is intended clearly stated on the map consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. 2. Density Bonuses for Affordable Housing Incentives: Proposed Policy A.2.2.7 to the Future Land Use Element requires that the City provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Housing Assistance Plan. Likewise, proposed Policy C.1.10. of the Housing Element would provide for density bonuses for affordable housing projects that are constructed consistent with the US Green Building Council. However, there is no policy in the City's Plan to define the amount of development that will be granted under a bonus program, and how it will be implemented. Additionally, the proposed bonus program has the potential to increase residential development in the Coastal High Hazard Area; however, the proposed policies do not ensure that such density bonuses would not be permitted on properties located within the City's Coastal High Hazard Area. Therefore, the proposed policies could direct population concentration to the Coastal High Hazard Area. [Sections 163.3177(6)(f) Lf ; 163.3178(1) and (2)(h); 163.3178(9)(a), F.S.; and Rules 9J- 5.005(6); Rule 9J-5.010(3)(b)7.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)1, (3)(b)5., 6., & 7.; 9J-5.016(3)(b)2, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise these policies to define the amount of residential development that will be granted under a density bonus program, and how the program will be implemented by the City. Additionally, include language to these policies that would ensure that such density bonuses are not being permitted within the Coastal High Hazard Area. 3. Comment: • Objective A.4.1 and Policy A.4.1.1 refer to levels of service for traffic circulation. However, the policy should be revised to refer to levels of service for roads instead of traffic circulation. B. Coastal Element: 4. Coastal High Hazard Area Man: Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 creates the Coastal Storm Area definition which encompasses the Coastal High Hazard Area. A map depicting the Coastal Storm Area boundary as an area that includes the Coastal High Hazard Area boundary is provided. However, based on the statutory requirements, the Coastal Storm Area map does not make a clear distinction between the Coastal Storm Area and Coastal High Hazard Area boundaries. Therefore, the City's Plan is not proposed to be revised to identity the Coastal High Hazard Area as required by law. [Section 163.3178(2)(h), F.S., and Rules 9J-5.006(4)(b)6.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)3., F.A.C.] Recommendation: Amend the Coastal Storm Area Map to clearly depict the Coastal High Hazard Area/Category 1 Storm Surge, as defined by Section 163.3178(2)(h), F.S. 5. Public Expenditures within the Coastal High Hazard Area: Proposed Policy E.3.1.4 appears to contradict proposed Policy E.3.1.3. While Policy E.3.1.3 states that the City will "limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in Coastal High Hazard Areas except for the restoration or enhancement of native resources," Policy E.3.1.4 states that the City will "ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities of the Future Land Use Element." Thus, Policy E.3.1.4 has the potential to subsidize development that will increase density within the Coastal High Hazard Area. [Sections 163.3178(1) and (2)(h); 163.3178(9)(a), and Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J- 5.012(3)(b)5., 6., & 7.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)l; 9J-5.016(3)(b)2, F.A.C] Recommendation: Revise proposed Policies E.3.1.3 and E.3.1.4 to be internally consistent and to require no subsidization of development that will increase density within the Coastal High Hazard Area. 2 . 1 0 0 6. Comments: • Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 does not reference the correct Coastal Storm Area Map. Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 identifies Map-13 as the Coastal Storm Area map; however, the Coastal Storm Area map included as part of the map series is identified as Map E-1. Therefore, the City should revise Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 to identify Map E-1 as the correct Coastal Storm Area map. • Proposed Policy E.4.1.9 provides for the preparation of a post-disaster redevelopment plan in an effort to reduce or eliminate the exposure of human life and public and private property to natural hazards. However, the policy does not specify a date by which the City will have its post-disaster redevelopment plan prepared. C. Capital Improvements Element: 7. Lack of Potable Water Supply Concurrency: The Capital Improvements Element does not address the requirements of Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., pertaining to water supply concurrency which requires the following: that adequate water supplies be in place and available to serve new development no later than the issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; and that prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the local government shall consult with the applicable water supplier to determine whether adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3177(6)(a) and (c); 163.3180(2)(a), F.S. Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J-5.0055(3); 9J-5.011(1 and 2); 9J-5.016(3)(c)5 and 6, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise the amendment to include a policy to ensure that the applicable water supplier is consulted prior to the issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent to ensure potable water supply will be available prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy as required by Section 163.3180(2)(x), F.S. 8. Lack of a Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements: This EAR-based amendment is not accompanied by an update of the Capital Improvements Element to include an updated Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements as required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)5., F.S., which addresses the capital improvements needs of the City during the next five years. [Sections 163.3164(32); 163.3177(2), (3)(a), (3)(b), (3)(c), (3)(d), and (3)(e).; 163.3177(6)(a), (c), (8), F.S, and Rules 9J-5.005(2)(a), (c); 9J-.005(5); 9J-5.055(2)(a); 9J- .006(2)(a), 9J-5.01 I (1)(b), (f) & (2)(b) & (c) and 9J-5.016(4)(a), F.A.C.] 3 • Recommendation: Include, in the plan, a financially feasible Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements with committed funding for improvements in the first three years and planned fundi for the remaining two years of the Five-year Schedule. The data and analysis pertainingvenues and expenditure have to be updated to show that there is adequate fund tin each identified source to pay for the listed capital improvements. Also, the data and analysis supporting the Five-year Schedule should include an update of the projected capital improvement needs of the City and show that the improvements on the rat.'. schedule will maintain and achieve the adopted level of service standards. This should be done by assessing what improvements are needed to achieve and maintain level of service in the short term planning horizons, the cost of the improvements for the short term, the funds available to pay for the improvements, and the timing of the improvements. For long term projected capital facility needs, the comprehensive plan must include long- term strategies which include programs and activities for the elimination of existing _ capacity deficits (Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)l.b., F.A.C.), but need not be accompanied by a demonstration that funding for projected needs is currently available or available from planned funding resources. Rather, these strategies should be embodied in policies that, as with others in the comprehensive plan, spell out the way in which programs and activities are conducted to achieve and"maintain the•adopted level of service standards for the long term. 9. Lack of Adopted Level of Service Standards in the Capital Improvements Element: With the exception of schools, the Capital Improvements Element does not set forth the level of service standards for public facilities subject to concurrency which is required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S. [Section 163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S., and Rules 9J-5.005(3); 9J-5.0055(2)(a)1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., and 8.; 9J-5.015(3)(b)3; 9J-5.016(3)(c)4., F.A.C.) Recommendation: Revise the Capital Improvements Element to include a policy that establishes level of service standards for public facilities subject to concurrency. 10. Lack of Concurrence Requirements for Roads: The proposed amendment to the Capital Improvements Element does not include changes to address the new requirement in the law pertaining to transportation concurrency. Pursuant to Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S., transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. To address this issue, Policy 1.1.3.3, subsection 3, references Policy I.1.3.3.1 and 1.1.3.3.2 which do not include provisions addressing the update to the law cited above. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S., and Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J-5.0055(3); 9J-5.016(3)(c)5. and 6., F.A.C.) 4 Recommendation: Revise Policy I.1.3.3, subsection 3, to delete reference to Policies I.1.3.3.1 and I.1.3.3.2, and to include provision that will ensure that transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation in order to be consistent with the above cited provision of the law. D. Transportation Element: 11. Lack of Planning Timeframe: The Future Transportation Map and map series (Map #'s B-1, B-3, B-4, B-5, B-7, B-8, B-9, B-11, and B-12) do not indicate the future timeframe for which they are intended consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. Section 163.3177(5)(a), F.S., requires that comprehensive plans include at least two planning periods, one covering at least the first 5-year period occurring after the plan's adoption and one covering at least a 10-year period. [Section 163.3177(5)(a); and Rules 9J-5.005(4), F.A.C.] Recommendation: Include, with the amendment, a Future Transportation Map and map series with the future timeframe for which they are intended clearly stated on all maps consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. 12. Comments: Objective B.1.5 states that, "All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. However, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requests that the City revise this objective to delete reference to the State Roadways. • Policy B.1.5.5 states that, "The City shall participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee to ensure that the level of service standard for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System facility will be consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of `D' for this road. However, the FDOT requests that the City revise this policy to state that the LOS standard for US 19 is "D". F. Housing Element: 13. Density Increases/Accessory Dwelling Units for Affordable Housing Projects: Proposed Policies C.1.9.1 and C.1.9.4 would permit density increases for projects incorporating affordable housing units. However, the policies do not clearly define the amount of additional density possible to be allowed in a particular land use category and to also restrict such bonuses from occurring within the Coastal High Hazard Area. i Additionally, proposed Policies C.1.1.8 and C.1.9.5 to this element and A.6.1.12 to the Future Land Use Element would allow accessory dwelling units within the City based on sufficient parking, and other standards. However, the City's Plan does not include adequate standards guiding the development of accessory dwelling units, such as defining the density of use that will be allowed, requiring that such accessory units are not built within the Coastal High Hazard Area and that the assessment of public facility impacts take into account the accessory units. [Sections 163.3177(6)(f) Lf ; 163.3178(1) and (2)(h); 163.3178(9)(a), F.S.; and Rules 9J- 5.005(6); Rule 9J-5.010(3)(b)7.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)1, (3)(b)5., 6., & 7.; 9J-5.016(3)(b)2, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise Policies C.1.9.1 and C.1.9.4 to clearly define the amount of additional density to be allowed in a particular land use category as affordable housing bonus. Additionally, revise Policies C.1.1.8 and C.1.9.5 to clearly define the amount of density to be established for accessory dwelling units. Furthermore, revise the policies to require that affordable housing bonuses as well as accessory dwelling units are not allowed on properties located within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Also, define the term "accessory dwelling units" and require that the assessment for public facility impact take into account the affordable housing units as well as accessory dwelling units allowed. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendments do not adequately address and further the State Comprehensive Plan, relating to the following goals and policies: • Goal 6.a, (Public Safety); Policy 6.b.23; (The amendments related to Objections 2 and 13); • Goal Ta, (Water Resources); Policies 7.b.5; (The amendments related to Objection 7); • Goal 17.a, (Public Facilities); Policies 17.b.5; (The amendments related to Objection 8); • Goal 19.a, (Transportation); Policies 19.b.3, and 19.b.13; (The amendments related to Objection 12); • Goal 25.a., (Plan Implementation); Policy 25.b.7 (The amendments related to all of the above objections). Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendments to be consistent with the above goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan, as recommended in this report. 6 m, Agenda Item #3.H.5 11/10/08 To.pa Say '4?;cral flonnl.p Conxll LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED EAR-BASED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#08-IER Description: Pursuant to Section 163.3191(10), FS, the City of Clearwater has submitted its Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments. The following is a sampling of the EAR-based amendments: Future Land Use Element Objective A.1.2: Population densities (inelu ed in the Coastal Management El L &„r.,?e i.,., =? d Use Map) in the coastal storm areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property except for specific areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, in which case densities identified in Beach by Design shall govern All densities in the coastal storm area a *d shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Emer encv Management HuFFieane Evaetiation l- c Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study Plan and shall b r d l a Policy A.1.2.1: The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodation uses located within the Citv's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved b the City for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. Policy A.1.2.2: Continue to cooperate with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and Pinellas County to meet the regional objectives for evacuation of permanent populations as well as other emergency concerns A-2.2.7: The City will provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Local Housing Assistance Plan and implemented through the City's Community Development Code GOAL A.5: The City of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a Citywide design structure com rised of a hierarch of laces and linkages. The Citywide design structure will serve as a For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 1 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the City uniquely Clearwater. Obiective A.5.1: Establish the Hierarchy of Place Objective A.5.2: Define linkages Objective A.5.3: Use the city-wide design structure as a guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the Citv of Clearwater. Obiective A.5.4: Use the Citvwide design structure as a guide to support redevelopment of properties along important corridors Obiective A.5.5: Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. Objective A.5.6: Use Public Art ad Design Program to contribute to Clearwater's visual identity, create memorable images of the city for visitors and residents reinforce Clearwater's role as an emerging regional leader in culture recreation and environmental management and the City's reputation as a wonderful place to five-earn. work and play. GOAL A.6: The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engineering practices and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources ensure neighborhood reservation redevelo bli hted areas and encoura e infill development. Policy A.6.1.2: Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encoura ed through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach. the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate transportation improvements inter-beach and intra-beach transit transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines pursuant to Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines Obiective A.6.3: The City shall encourage the implementation of historic overlay districts the maintenance of existing historic properties and the preservation of existing neighborhoods through the use of design guidelines and the implementation of the City's Community Development Code. Obiective A.6.5: The City shall encourage improved land use compatibility through the evaluation of traffic calming techniques multi-modal transportation networks and the use of transit oriented development planning. Policy A.6.9.3: Develop incentives for LEED-certified and FGBC certified buildings For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 2 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • Transportation Element Policv B.1.4.4: The City shall explore transportation concurrence alternatives such as Multi modal Transportation Districts (MMTDs) for downtown Clearwater Beach and/or other potential redevelopment areas or activity centers to incorporate community design features that reduce vehicular usage while supporting an integrated multi-modal transportation system Policv B.1.4.6: When a development results in traffic generation volumes causing a degradation of service below D in the pm peak hour, the Citv shall require transportation facilities to be in place or under actual construction within 3-years after issuance of a building permit in accordance with the City's Proportionate Fair Share Program Objective B.1.7: The natural, recreational scenic historic and cultural resources of the Courtney Campbell Causeway shall be preserved and enhanced for the City of Clearwater residents. Policy B.3.2.2: Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts where applicable for future high- speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties Housing Element Policy C.1.1.7: The City shall further the goal of providing a variety of housing choices by encouraging land assembly where possible through such things as density bonuses height increases, and setback reductions. Policy C.1.1.8: Consider accessory dwelling units wherever they can be accommodated by adequate lot area and provided they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering. parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.2.6: The City shall identify vacant and under-utilized city-owned property that may be deemed surolus property and make it available for the development of affordable housing- Policy C.1.2.7: The City shall work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation and local government bodes to protect dedicated affordable housing revenues as provided by the Economic Development and Housing Department's 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document the Sadowski Act and Federal State and Local Government Housing Trust Funds Objective C.1.9: The City of Clearwater shall be proactive in incentivizing the construction of affordable housing. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 3 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Objective C.1.10: Recognizing that sustainable building techniques contribute to keeping housing units affordable over the long term by reducing energy consumption lowering utility bills and decreasing maintenance costs the Citv of Clearwater will promote the use of green' housing construction. renovation and rehabilitation Objective C.1.11: Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other organizations to see an end to homelessness. Utilities Element Stormwater Minor changes only. Solid Waste Minor changes only. Stormwater Minor changes only. Potable Water & Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Policy D.5.5.8: When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs at the locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7) years the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications. Coastal Manallement Policy E.1.6.2: The City will encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities Policy E.1.6.3: The City discourages the rezoning of recreational and commercial working waterfronts. Policy E.1.6.4: The City will support accessory transient marina docks and slips through the Community Development Code and special area plans Policy EAU: Limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high- hazard areas except for restoration or enhancement of natural resources Policy E.3.1.4: Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities of the Future Land Use Element For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 4 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 GOAL EA The City shall accom lish ost-disaster redevelopment in a manner that shall minimize public and private vulnerability to future disasters GOAL E.5: The preservation of economic activity within the Coastal Storm Area is a priority for th_ e Ctty. Conservation Element Policy F.1.2.3: The City shall support the establishment of Total Maximum Dail Loads (TMDL) for impaired water and its implementation as appropriate within the City. Policy F.1.2.10: Monitor and enforce City requirements for treatment ponds and environmental mideation sites. Policy F.1.7.5: Provide education programs to encourage preservation of the natural environment and promote the use of "Florida friendly" and drought tolerant vegetation and around cover in an effort to conserve water. Policy F.2.1.10: The City will encourage the use of "Low Impact Development" techniques for stormwater management. such as minimal land disturbance the reservation of native vegetation, and the minimization of impervious cover, through site plan and internal processes Recreation and Open Space Minor changes only. Intergovernmental Coordination Policv H.1.1.7: The City shall strengthen coordination with other municipalities, the MPO Pinellas County and FDOT to establish measure and maintain the level of service standards for roadwavs in the Strategic Intermodal System (U S 19) and other State 'Country Roads Policv H.1.1.10: The Citv shall stren then the level of coordination with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) the Tam2a Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) Pinellas County, and other municipalities to promote the concept of livable neighborhoods Policy H.1.1.11: The City shall establish specific policies to .provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas Count other cities the Tampa Bay For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17. 2008 5 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. Capital Improvements Element Minor changes only. Public School Facilities No changes. • Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that by their breadth and scope, the EAR- based amendments will directly or indirectly be related to or impact regionally significant resources and facilities. • Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No. • Effects of the amendment on the following issues: • Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: The EAR-based amendments appear to be compatible with local plans. • Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Potable water within the City of Clearwater is provided by 23 City-operated fresh water wells (19 active and 4 inactive) and seven interconnects with the Pinellas County water system. Pinellas County water is purchased by the City of Clearwater through an intergovernmental agreement as a means to augment the City's groundwater sources and to meet the City's water demands. Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: The City has adopted a number of policies that address how the City will encourage the building of more affordable housing. Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: The City's EAR-based amendments include policies that support the protection of natural resources of regional significance located within the City's Planning Area including LULC wet and dry, pine flatwoods, and FNAI Coastal and Wetland Communities. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 6 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable to the proposed amendment. Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities including, but, not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: The City has many new policies that address transportation issues. The EAR-based amendments identify improvements that will increase capacity on McMullen Booth Road. In addition, policies address consistency with FDOT's minimum levels of service for roadway facilities, transit service, high speed rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, concurrency management, and Multi-modal transportation systems. In addition, multi-modal transportation improvements are being planned to help alleviate congestion and parking issues on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. The City will also consider Multi-modal Transportation Districts for downtown and the beach. Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: The City has adopted the required policies addressing the CHHA/Coastal Storm Area and evacuation clearance times. • Regional Comments: None. . Applicable SRPP Policies: The additions and revisions contained in the proposed amendment were found to be supportive of and further the goals and policies of the SRPP's five subject areas. Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of November 10, 2003 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 7 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 A o 0 o n G -, a rn ? 'n to ?y n. ? O ?• o "O o Cr CD J (D IV O Cr 00 •"i O N O O W 00 N n' w G ? G k w n 00 Im, lag a v I Coastal Storm Area , (Including Coastal High } Hazard Area) Molrc0 ,.Y ..? Mup k: E-1 .... .. 3 I ,,, l c Date: 71172008 - j c Uuxl.mn 4 } I'Sourco: 7lmpa tin HWt7ior411 N.nilhpGwWil j - !' .? 2 ? ? _PFIMM.Vw rylJrn TWO- j +.• irw nyµ, I ?. Wxbd lxliy /ru i ttxu +:grV1sJN.f? I Cu.rd c."yWIMtxIY44Wrl,eler lU YN?II•n a\ , au r ?a Y M.I rp ?. LQiicnd F" Z- vF ((EMA lO-ty Z-) - ;,, nr w«ur ?. I ta ICox?wl HO fiat d Ale.l - (:HIIA) I L •+ r"., - `'q C;S P. W ho"C.u 1 Slmm Sop is i i. r? V t ?' q S •1'? ?" m?Y r tl m xl d b MY4 0l 0w ?.,. ,, ??+?1 I? 1 1 iil - SI ,u, ryNnrl rlhr InrAlln of Irl xxi # 1:. .,. ?•Y- ... r A J I xu bu Il llry tlmlmt le nu•M1. g?. }i AI, 7 t ? ....,•. I :.j ? I lvcalWFrMA vl.Anry/UIN.IK IIIrluh:? \`'? 1! V } ,?u k. J I . i-v: 1 i n I I A. b IINu ?{ y ?'I .?I w I :Nwl M.... VI. i,ll t I. IN Np J II4N1 Ix ddyy3377 y f'°\ i t I , - t> •"^t,?? "r`) .. '? j V y,N ? • -.. r t -) u I auticxw utrnY Ii* Getuwn4.Y 0,iy k-+w8s ?t a?I +? _ 4 ... ll i ..` t ,f??'' { 1 Aurwalm I'lunnnpl hnvl i vh ., fi ... I I }t?d ? ... ? _ ? ,A' - •` " 3nC,p L tfC?r ,v .^?rv;•I Uulsule GculwaWl Clly Untils rir u?,w. , . IN •irr n.u. ... .Y .-,y .... .. II ru iv ). a h ? M r uN.; yI, r? fY? { CleaRvaterx. CI) 0 y x ? a? lD "•1 • • ? o v 0 ? o v ? n ? v ?. a? O ?• O O ro N N 3 O CT* 00 O N O O Do 110 CG a c ? Q M O n ? W C) 00 E t r3 c 1 .vet, .? a1r i? X =1 ,? Hurricane Storm 4 Surge Areas Mop #: E-2 Oat.: 711812008 `-y,' y i_ .. . ..Tnn W u.,y R.Uk ?I _ ( ?yi ww nr 5' Y, tR y i .aourco. ', { r .; "` ,? . ?. ?z 5? " .'.s s : Y . 'R. r Lefictul. Ylq. 1 i SI . ?...1._ L Y Qq4 tilnrm Surge Mma3 1 fy Stem = 2 TM° `Y Y??' f .; CltlaNrater rqurNJrmg Area ?X0, y.C ? E 't3? o,?l 'V r }; f y ? eft X11 r ? +?:%i_? ?... `?3u s r. r. 5 a r LL! p ^ 1 4san.N.i,e. Cleammer„ Lr 7 n f? ro rr?yr r..i ? C ro ro ro • • 0 O n ? o ? c G C 9 o. ^ 0 ?. O ? CY O (D + ,z J O N N3 0 O I?j O O or, 0 l i. r 'r ..... T ?r Y .....1.<r,4.? ....! dl 1 ?.. f l • ' y w,. C '' M, t wi ? h jr 5. , r r h ? ° atV ! ) nu vn ? 'tN'r?`.t?\ "` . 1 r rn G ? O w A 00 .^. I' '-4jU J, ii: r _ e r. } ?=7 777" =1 r 24 z X O-. l ? ?w is 4! t.• j I 1r ti 1 o .y *itI ? i w. r J ' 4 1 r 3 k? . ..................... .......I tcw.•. was. , Floodplains Map!!: A-10 Data: 7117120uu Sourco: FFMA I May 2005 1 L'f f1 j FiWJ Huml Arens lfum A1100yrI I(OCI NW1-A RIN 01.1 j AC/I(*i FLOOD' MAIL Ll LV. LE 1. r?A0r 10C/I FLOOD' 1.0'(l'LCWING) j UNDEVELOPED COAS IAL HAHRR,.RS ?. VF ICOASTAl. FLOCOAHtA ?,. X".00 / sl0 YH FLOOO ARkA AR1AOLII^IIN= ACYR I IQN) ,..: (1-a-l", 1 •I,uw.Lyl Atr.t f wmtItl,r (:I,;euwrtlrrt I:ity I wiul:? "Clearwater - O O ^7 l 1 CD p7 ? 5 rn co "Y • u ?o Ill (D o v -, 0 ? o c w ?. v :. a? 0 Q. Cr o r "z J o0 CD pN O a' 00 CD O ? N O O 00 (n A W G ? .`f d M O X r. ? W C7 00 . ? - Future - E I Land Use L?L ??t? a y !Map s: A-1 .: r,TJl? I 1 i211 ty : Data: 7116/2000 . EZ >. i>' 1 { ?I Sourco I'ImNlac P4varhxJ Cmuvill Jun 2W7 MBYtCO - .w+w.wnw. y // gjmLd M RI ??q ?„ }tiJ +r g I ? ? I F u nL.nd l/.W Categor ne fi?p.t--? ??? w ? ? 11 L'r k1 nzl Fk mf Lb - 5 A1: a•"Y j ! ?Iim:.M JTI1IN.l `;lAi[' awurl 1 asowlw Low a ` y RU KfAXN1 .... • fr qvp ?b I Y1 .;NNAN .'.S ZEO i Q ULM RL UFNIIALLOw MEI,IUaI I F 11 IJ ?? µ j / NI Re^ux r.Tta. uerrn, e Rrl. RESIOF.NTLAL HKCH I 'aR,'OL. RESMNTV4M FICE LWED W RIOC- "-IL'E.NUAL-EW ICr. AWRAI i Sv ?s ?r I r t ma RL nexRrl,'aFrwEmrTAa 1 ... n fly 2t•l ' ?G •' ? ? U i ? ?F?•?Rs'? `z r: •Y'3 r f r' ? ' . • ? Pfr. FESC ^ R[ I/wAIRE.'.. HK,71 < •..{- GN^...Mn4 REAL hclfd QS[klral(X) tt?? tt n` • 3sQ-?Y 4 &[ii?i16, d'w': tli,,,6. 7.. Gf- w. c.l;DNUaERCluIUnlEr. ?.l F t ®Ji9:.y~J3t7 ?' r Q? , COU1 sERCVa (A1,61011- C1511. CFrfHlA IHISM[ti,:INS )RU:I arUk,,^3iiR , a Ina s,M i. y,? ? ?{'?Q! ??., ? r a .1+I)usrkw I.Itrntr. S iYQl +? / ?e Y Il.c 's LfM t' t I P'1+fiP' ; I?r,!' .S ICPIDUSrR?ALOENERAL mRnl (,+Jf I i>:fb ?.t" If,.? L 1 . ?` !y I !ice` .............. ....._.1 udaw, ??4+;:?? r +?'?i'i? ?.«_... c ;yy' I r .Q?'?Fii???"+f `Yf d?'?"??? III ?.1• P•PR?'?RVArron I R? q tr 4x ,?}?? r "'y ?? 1 ? , ,Q?" ? I €x9 Irc7s nF:cwnncxucrFN:v,,c_ ,ryC b )A 3. ?T :. e yl - E '•,.,..re}`'.i:w ?` 1 IM Ia,.w.rILCITAk °R*gg. ••?t"n MMS(k ITAI KIt1LTILIIY "? ??flY? 'W r wrgld IZ p! ,?`?'" -!J I? 'I gmmisW7IrcK Y " If` • CRPCGtArtUYIfY RLllEVcla,MLHI DLSiIhI"I'.•e;:,n>. v .'o +i?+axal_•?•?..tatlalcA8AQi1lNQQEf55t1 r?.....i 'b? ?>_-? ?...,r 7 I4ul a l7lM? l a' ?. !,Arno- ..: ?» ? .. .®?_.. Y„ I. N la Frr l u O f [ Y y?)o ?' I CJ .,v y .. ? icwnwe II Nfn a"0 I malt ••t3 ?i 7 O fD r C A? i9 • • T FL ? S ou tfwest Florida ? . - Water Management District o cn-.f"g,r An Equal Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office opportunity Employer 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 3600 West Sovereign Path (863) 534-1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) (352) 527-8131 Neil Combee Chair, Polk Todd Pressman Vice Chair, Pinellas Jennifer E. Closshey Secretary, Hillsborough Ronald E. Oakley Treasurer, Pasco Bryan K. Beswick Desoto Patricia M: Glass Manatee Hugh M. Gramling Hillsborough Albert G.Joerger Sarasota Sallie Parks Pinellas Maritza Rovira-Forino Hil Ighnrnugh H. Paul Senft, Jr. Polk Douglas B. Tharp Sumter Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L. Moore Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel October 31, 2008 Ray Eubanks, Plan Review Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 2379 Brkreet, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) Subject: City of Clearwater 08-2AR (second letter) Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with Chapter 163, F.S., the staff of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) has reviewed the above referenced Comprehensive Plan amendment. The District has worked with City of Clean/vC4L I Staff to address several °vvater Supply related areas of concern contained within the recent Comprehensive Plan submittal package (08- RWSP1). The City has addressed the District's concerns (see attachment) by updating and submitting the Potable Water Element of the Comprehensive Plan and including the City's long range Water Supply Master Plan as part of this amendment package (08-2AR). The District has no further comments at this time. The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review of comprehensive plan amendments. Please note that this review does not constitute permit approval under Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), or any rules promulgated thereunder, nor does it stand in lieu of normal permitting procedures in accordance with Florida Statutes and District rules. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (352) 796-7211, extension 4423. Sindbrely, _ ---- son M. Mickel Inior Planner Attachments cc: Gina L. Clayton,100 South Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Jim Quinn, Department of Environmental Protection (via e-mail) Cori Cuttler, CLA-TPA a 0% a Post-Consumer ""--^^?? W3e- ? T Tampa BayXegional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Vice-Mapor Deborab I(v nes Commissioner Biff Dodson October 31, 2008 Gina Clayton Asst. Director of Planning City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Clayton: Secretarh/Treasurer Commissioner Jack Mariano Executive Director Manng Pumariega Enclosed is a copy of the Council's review of the City of Clearwater's comprehensive plan amendment, 08-1 ER. The report will be an agenda item for Council consideration at the Monday, November 10, 2008 Council meeting, which will begin at 10:00 a.m. Please do not hesitate to contact Jessica Lunsford, Sr. Planner, at ext. 38 if more information or clarification concerning the contents of the report is needed. Sincerely, Manny L. Pumariega, AICP Executive Director Enclosure i Nov 3 M ? E PL4Nft . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES v Oc CLEARWATER 40oo GatewaN Centre Boufevard, Suite i oo • Pinellas Park FL 33782 Phone: 727-5 70-S I S I • Fax: 727-5 7o-S I i 8 • State Number: S13-5o66 • wwwtbrpc.ory s t? s Agenda Item 0.11.5 11/10/08 Tampa 8ay9Leplanal Planning Counc/! LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED EAR-BASED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#08-IER Description: Pursuant to Section 163.3191 (10), FS, the City of Clearwater has submitted its Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments. The following is a sampling of the EAR-based amendments: Future Land Use Element Objective A.1.2• Population densities (i =eluded i the Coastal Management Element and the Futur-e Land Use N4* in the coastal storm areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property except for specific areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, in which case densities identified in Beach by Design shall govern. All densities in the coastal storm area red shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Emergency Management L'ti?eane Evae ia4ion Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study Plan and shall be maintained or to o ?o a Policy A.1.2.1: The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodation uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan approved by the City for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City_ Policy A.1.2.2: Continue to cooperate with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and Pinellas County to meet the regional objectives for evacuation of permanent populations as well as other emergency concerns. A.2.2.7: The City will provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Local Housing Assistance Plan and implemented through the City's Community Development Code. GOAL A.5: The City of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a Citywide design structure comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The Citywide design structure will serve as a For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Report prepared October 17, 2008 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the City uniquely Clearwater. Objective A.5.1: Establish the Hierarchy of Place Objective A.5.2: Define linkages Objective A.5.3: Use the city-wide design structure as a guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the City of Clearwater. Objective A.5.4: Use the Citywide design structure as a guide to support redevelopment of properties along important corridors. Objective A.5.5: Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. Objective A.5.6: Use Public Art ad Design Program to contribute to Clearwater's visual identity, create memorable images of the city for visitors and residents, reinforce Clearwater's role as an emerging regional leader in culture, recreation and environmental management and the City's reputation as a wonderful place to live, earn, work and play. GOAL A.6: The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and encourage infill development. Policy A.6.1.2: Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Objective A.6.3: The City shall encourage the implementation of historic overlay districts the maintenance of existing historic properties, and the preservation of existing neighborhoods through the use of design guidelines and the implementation of the City's Community Development Code. Objective A.6.5: The City shall encourage improved land use compatibility through the evaluation of traffic calming techniques, multi-modal transportation networks, and the use of transit oriented development planning Policy A.6.9.3: Develop incentives for LEED-certified and FGBC-certified buildings a For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 2 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 Transportation Element Policy B.1AA The City shall explore transportation concurrency alternatives, such as Multi- modal Transportation Districts (MMTDs), for downtown, Clearwater Beach and/or other potential redevelopment areas or activity centers to incorporate community design features that reduce vehicular usage while supporting an integrated multi-modal transportationsystem. Policy B.1.4.6: When a development results in traffic generation volumes causing a degradation of service below D in the pm peak hour, the City shall require transport ation facilities to be in place or under actual construction within 3-years after issuance of a building permit in accordance with the City's Proportionate Fair Share Program. Objective B.1.7: The natural, recreational, scenic, historic, and cultural resources of the Courtney Campbell Causeway shall be preserved and enhanced for the City of Clearwater residents. Policy B.3.2.2: Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts, where applicable, for future high- speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. Housing Element Policy C.1.1.7: The City shall further the goal of providing a variety of housing choices by encouraging land assembly where possible, through such things as density bonuses, height increases, and setback reductions. Policy C.1.1.8: Consider accessory dwelling units wherever they can be accommodated by adequate lot area and provided they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.2.6: The City shall identify vacant and under-utilized city-owned property that may be deemed surplus property and make it available for the development of affordable housing. Policy C.1.2.7: The City shall work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation and local government bodes to protect dedicated affordable housing revenues as provided by the Economic Development and Housing Department's 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document, the Sadowski Act, and Federal, State and Local Government Housing Trust Funds. Obiective C.1.9: The City of Clearwater shall be proactive in incentivizing the construction of affordable housing. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 3 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Objective C.1.10: Recognizing that sustainable building techniques contribute to keeping housing units affordable over the long term by reducing energy consumption, lowering Utility bills and decreasing maintenance costs, the City of Clearwater will promote the use of green housing construction, renovation, and rehabilitation. Objective C.1.11: Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other organizations to see an end to homelessness. Utilities Element Stormwater Minor changes only. Solid Waste Minor changes only. Stormwater Minor changes only. Potable Water & Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Policy D.5.5.8: When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs at the locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7) years, the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications. Coastal Management Policy E.1.6.2: The City will encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities. Policy E.1.6.3: The City discourages the rezoning of recreational and commercial working waterfronts. Policy E.1.6.4: The City will support accessory transient marina docks and slips through the Community Development Code and special area plans. Policy E.3.1.3: Limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high- hazard areas except for restoration or enhancement of natural resources. Policy E.3.1.4: Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities of the Future Land Use Element. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 4 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 9 0 GOAL EA The City shall accomplish Post-disaster redevelopment in a manner that shall minimize public and private vulnerability to future disasters. GOAL E.5: The preservation of economic activity within the Coastal Storm Area is a priority for the City. Conservation Element Policy F.1.2.3: The City shall support the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for impaired water and its implementation as appropriate within the City. Policy F.1.2.10: Monitor and enforce City requirements for treatment ponds and environmental mitigation sites. Policy F.1.7.5: Provide education programs to encourage preservation of the natural environment and promote the use of "Florida friendly" and drought tolerant vegetation and ground cover in an effort to conserve water. Policy F.2.1.10: The City will encourage the use of "Low Impact Development" techniques for stormwater management, such as minimal land disturbance, the preservation of native vegetation, and the minimization of impervious cover, through site plan and internal processes. Recreation and Open Space Minor changes only. Intergovernmental Coordination Policy H.1.1.7: The City shall strengthen coordination with other municipalities, the MPO, Pinellas County and FDOT to establish, measure, and maintain the level of service standards for roadways in the Strategic Intermodal System (U.S. 19) and other State and Country Roads. Policy H.1.1.10: The City shall strengthen the level of coordination with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), Pinellas County, and other municipalities to promote the concept of livable neighborhoods. Policy H.1.1.11: The City shall establish specific policies to provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas County, other cities the Tampa Bay For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 5 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 9 9 Regional Planning Council, and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. Capital Improvements Element Minor changes only. Public School Facilities No changes. • Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that by their breadth and scope, the EAR- based amendments will directly or indirectly be related to or impact regionally significant resources and facilities. • Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No. • Effects of the amendment on the following issues: • Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: The EAR-based amendments appear to be compatible with local plans. • Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Potable water within the City of Clearwater is provided by 23 City-operated fresh water wells (19 active and 4 inactive) and seven interconnects with the Pinellas County water system. Pinellas County water is purchased by the City of Clearwater through an intergovernmental agreement as a means to augment the City's groundwater sources and to meet the City's water demands. Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: The City has adopted a number of policies that address how the City will encourage the building of more affordable housing. Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: The City's EAR-based amendments include policies that support the protection of natural resources of regional significance located within the City's Planning Area including LULC wet and dry, pine flatwoods, and FNAI Coastal and Wetland Communities. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 6 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable to the proposed amendment. Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities including, but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: The City has many new policies that address transportation issues. The EAR-based amendments identify improvements that will increase capacity on McMullen Booth Road. In addition, policies address consistency with FDOT's minimum levels of service for roadway facilities, transit service, high speed rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, concurrency management, and Multi-modal transportation systems. • In addition, multi-modal transportation improvements are being planned to help alleviate congestion and parking issues on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. The City will also consider Multi-modal Transportation Districts for downtown and the beach. • Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: The City has adopted the required policies addressing the CHHA/Coastal Storm Area and evacuation clearance times. • Regional Comments: None. • Applicable SRPP Policies: The additions and revisions contained in the proposed amendment were found to be supportive of and further the goals and policies of the SRPP's five subject areas. • Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 7 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 z? b ~ .L^yI h Q G rp n a ry ric crr r? 7, J fD N O ,7 O Iv C C t)0 00 s w r Un G r? G ? O "?h cL ? O r. r„ n 00 City • • • 11: .N iSMAfl §q v 0 1J ?r e _ mNrIrNN q A„n«ar i h 1 T 3 v ... .........i ................!4g.'?....i 9 ? ? .v (nr s. rw.rr;m . ? dr'?+ ?r ? i.., l ..+l4r•,}s: .... y 8 ?Nw J 9 r x tl r ........... aura:...... w? xN. are Coastal Storm Area (Including Coastal High Hazard Area) Map #: E 1 Dale: 7/1712008 11-1BNy Reglon. rlnnnirra COUrMI BOIIrCe: T rmmtn cuvnryrJmr2oae Ihgn?¢rtmrnsrvvan,xrn may Ibr >„ry,lele ?nlm rn refer In I"rr?ell:t, rnrnlY 1!lannx,gxltr Legend I-kqd Zona VE (FEMA VelixAy Zone) Evacuatm Level A M (Coastal Mgh H.srd Ares GHHA) r Parcels W.. Cal I Sloan Surge is greater than o, equel to 20% of IhP parcel, of those "10,5 oI al tsla KI W I ;,Waled by the Cat I Storm Surge. i Areas of FFMA Velocity Zona ool indided io Fvamrelinn Leval A Incki s It. ontira portal .1.,e VE Zone Is greater than or etlual to 70% of the Rarcol ._J Loraaoos atop 11. Clearwater Bay Bluffs Clealwalel Planning Area outside Clearwater City Lhnlls Cleal?vatcr T? t i 0 W ? x? r"S u • xJ T rv O ?a p .b G fo n rp ? G. ? O ? .?» no O O ? ^y ry 7_, J IJ ? O O- 0 00 rD tJ C C 00 CD r C a (? M ° Y. w ? r. Comprehensive 2008 • T Surge Areas KO,f . ? sMAn Hurricane Storm Map #: E-2 C4 of Clearwater w n Date 711 812 0 0 6 I ?^ r? I SOUfCe: Tampa -11 I MAY Planning C ouncll ey 2006 Storm Surge Areas Storm Category `0?? . wmnw "w, J! M 7 v . a ................ 9 f, Jne ?4 ? h3 4 R ? /q"' ,, teamster Plennplg Area g" a ? 74 W Outside Clearwater Gity Limits i ...................... _.,. ..... . Y . ? .r ?? ? yr t • tr,Mapr ,+avr ,m rN ? )V??`' 1 C I Al.. ?s. B r I I t ?-- `lY«Rro F y e r 'eFLLF.Am ? Pf flfh? IY' `P' ...._..., .... ?. I, Clc?r«lattr w "S ? 1 1 ? s UQ .. rD ? rD W • 0 ? o b 0 ^d E rn n b =. w _ ry a ? O _. O v ry IJ .O Q- O 00 O O GO O t7 c r, n m° Y. ? (;"if of mam" - -- ?..? ....... P nlln.nln C .tvv. uv.vt r e+en b vaw?Nn i ?FR r Nr - ?yY C'Mr Mi ?1 % 1 5 :?A ; g i yy 55 4 g } A . ! r / / ''?0' ?{IF3i f. tr '?'' en .aeV e In, ., I ? M n., ? k ^' - ' ii t In Floodplains Map p: A-10 [xu^.MAH Date: 711712008 Source: FEMA I May 2006 Leuend Fk),d Razard Areas Zara Al 100y, FLOOD- NO BASE ELEV. DET. AL 1100y, FLOOD BASF FLEV DET. AOI100yr FLOOD- 1-3')FLOWINO) UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS VE/COASIAI FLO(A)AREA X5001500YRVLOODAREA 4 AREA OUTSIDE 500 YR FLOOD Clearwater Planning Area Outside Clearwater City 1_1mils Clearwater,.-. tTIHPw .,. ? ... ............. 1 s. 1 . rw 1 i O m, ^ \ [ S ;^^p,, • • r o 0 ? o b c -, o ro ry FD a ti O -- IJo 0 0 CD , ? O J FJ 7 O Q O 00 O O 00 r n !y C ? O "'h ? O x ? w x .. 07 Mevnlco .om.wnw a. H 11, r. t ,5 BELLEAR n nuwm Y Aw n.arnnxRm s t rLlpernr1w? ,r Ilp . ` r .?mv Id CIMFM Wr "?? n:A(WAVE 'a:i qp IL AI.1 41t ? _,.,F1?? ii 1. ;. nHin+ ?x l Future Land Use "+,,, Map 1: A-0 OLnaMAR Date: 711612008 Source: Pinellas Planning Council ! Jun 2007 n 1,tI Uwnd Fm.•rIainl 11Re Uelplles • I I il il I' Pero.i,a anal IM.cd Use R !'y ' i I M HE - RFSXICNIIAI. F6TATE ( f j f A? RS- RESi1EN11AL SUBURBAN " W In RESIDENTIAL LOW RU- RESIDENTIAL URRAIJ y J W RIM RESIJENI IAL LOW MEUa1M r.,td r, :TIM RESNJENMLMEDttJM ?In?. RFSIOENTIN. HIGH I I , N - RFSIIIENTIAI/OFFICE IAMPED F'. H: RFIREWNTMLIOEEICE GENERAL I I (' Y ? I [LR RERIUFNIIN 11111CEAIETAIL l / Rft? RESORT FACII. H IFS NIGH ' l f - nM1OA IN COMMERCIALNEI%KMH00D 01-COMMERCAU.LIMIIED 101 CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL CBO- CENTWU.BUSINE.SS DISTRICT "A's, I) A- INDUSTRIAL LIMITED K INDUSTRIAL GENERAL ? . 1 P ........................... I•y..3' ?+ . M P RESERVATION Ma, RNS RECRFATIONIOPEN SPACE $ ` -, INS-INS111U110NAL ! "" r / I._ll IAJ - 1 RANSPORTATIONIUTILITY i D ho H - ' ano egos s CRO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PI-11- PI. nrg( a - WAler rent a Owe lay flearwale EM - gA- IlntsltleCIrural olyL mis ?, I Clcar<vater - KT. K e` Q rn ? K 0 0 • • Page 1 of 3 Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:05 AM To: 'Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us' Subject: RE: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR awesome! Talk to you later. Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us [mailto:Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:53 AM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: RE: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR It worked! I will be reviewing it today/tomorrow. Talk to you soon. Jason M. Mickel / Sr. Planner, Planning Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, FL 34604 352.796.7211 X4423 I Fax: (352) 754-6749 jason.mickel(a?swfwmd.state.fl.us I hqp://www.watermatters.org <Sandra.Herman@myClearwater.com> To <Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us> 10/27/2008 10:27 AM cc Subject RE: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Jason, Hi. Actually, the second cd is currently in pdf format and you are so correct it is difficult to open - I had some trouble but sent you one that opened on my computer - could be because it is a large document. Please try this for me: try again to open it and leave it for a few minutes, then double click on it again and it might say "not responding" at top of your screen, and if it does say this at top, it should open shortly. If not, email me again and I'll work on producing new ones. Computers are great! I will wait to hear from you. Thank you. Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us [mailto:Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:20 AM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: Re: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR 1/5/2008 0 • Page 2 of 3 Hello Sandy, 4 I received the CDs and tried to review them this morning. The CD with the original Potable Water Element - Appendix J (CPA2007-06003) opened without a problem but the CD with the updated Potable Water Element (CPA2008-03002) will not open. I'm not sure if the CD is corrupt or if the file format is incompatible with our software (I tried it on several computers). Perhaps, you can try converting it to pdf and trying it on another computer to see if it works?? Thanks. Jason M. Mickel Sr. Planner, Planning Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad. Street, Brooksville, FL 34604 352.796.7211 X4423 I Fax: (352) 754-6749 jason.mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us I http://www.watermatters.or <Sa nd ra. He rman@myClearwater.com> 10/23/2008 07:59 AM To <jason.mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us> cc Subject FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Mr. Mickel, The files referenced below are too large to send by email so I'll be mailing them to you. Sandy Herman > -----Original Message----- > From: Herman, Sandra > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:22 PM > To: 'Jason.Mickel@SWFWMD.State.FL.US' > Subject: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR > Mr. Mickel, > Good morning. > The attached document for 08-2AR should open now for you. We apologize that it was not included on your CDROM copy. > Since we transmitted this EAR Based amendment package, on September 18, 2008, the City adopted ordinance no. 7950-08 (DCA 08-RWSP-1) that incorporates the Water Master Plan into the Utilities Element. It includes the changes as per your direction in working with Rob Fahey, Clearwater Engineering manager, and also the water projects from the new FY2008/09 CIP schedule that was adopted on Sept. 18, 2008. > As it is too large to email, tomorrow I will overnight (Fed Ex) to you the file that is being mailed out today to DCA and the other reviewing agencies (a copy of the cd will go to Mr. Ray Mazur at SWFWMD). It includes the updated "Potable Water Element" document that was prepared for the City by consulting firm Wade Trim and our adopted ordinance 7950-08 that amends the City's Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. > Prior to adoption of the EAR based amendments, we will making revisions in accordance with adopted ord. 7950-08 (Water Plan). > If you have any questions or problems opening any of the other documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. > Thank you for your patience and consideration. > > Sandra E. Herman > Planner III > Planning Department > City of Clearwater, Florida > 100 South Myrtle Avenue > Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 > PO Box 4748, 33758-4748 11/5/2008 > Telephone: (727) 562-4586 • > Fax: (727) 562-4865 > sandra.herman@myclearwater.com > > • Page 3 of 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE: All E-mail sent to or from this address are public record and archived. The Southwest Florida Water Management District does not allow use of District equipment and E-mail facilities for non-District business purposes. IMPORTANT NOTICE: All E-mail sent to or from this address are public record and archived. 11/5/2008 • • Page 1 of 2 Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:27 AM To: 'Jason. Mickel@swfwmd.state. fl. us' Subject: RE: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Jason, Hi. Actually, the second cd is currently in pdf format and you are so correct it is difficult to open - I had some trouble but sent you one that opened on my computer - could be because it is a large document. Please try this for me: try again to open it and leave it for a few minutes, then double click on it again and it might say "not responding" at top of your screen, and if it does say this at top, it should open shortly. If not, email me again and I'll work on producing new ones. Computers are great! I will wait to hear from you. Thank you. Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us [mailto:Jason.Mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:20 AM To: Herman, Sandra Subject: Re: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Hello Sandy, I received the CDs and tried to review them this morning. The CD with the original Potable Water Element - Appendix J (CPA2007-06003) opened without a problem but the CD with the updated Potable Water Element (CPA2008-03002) will not open. I'm not sure if the CD is corrupt or if the file format is incompatible with our software (I tried it on several computers). Perhaps, you can try converting it to pdf and trying it on another computer to see if it works?? Thanks. Jason M. Mickel Sr. Planner, Planning Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, FL 34604 352.796.7211 X4423 I Fax: (352) 754-6749 jason.mickeI@swfwmd.state.fl.us I http://www.watermatters.org <Sandra.Herman a@myClearwater.com> TO. <jason.mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us> cc 10/23/2008 07:59 AM Subject FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Mr. Mickel, The files referenced below are too large to send by email so I'll be mailing them to you. Sandy Herman 11/5/2008 • • Page 2 of 2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Herman, Sandra > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:22 PM > To: 'Jason.Mickel@SWFWMD.State.FL.US' > Subject: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR > Mr. Mickel, > Good morning. > The attached document for 08-2AR should open now for you. We apologize that it was not included on your CDROM copy. > Since we transmitted this EAR Based amendment package, on September 18, 2008, the City adopted ordinance no. 7950-08 (DCA 08-RWSP-1) that incorporates the Water Master Plan into the Utilities Element. It includes the changes as per your direction in working with Rob Fahey, Clearwater Engineering Manager, and also the Water projects from the new FY2008/09 CIP schedule that was adopted on Sept. 18, 2008. > As it is too large to email, tomorrow I will overnight (Fed Ex) to you the file that is being mailed out today to DCA and the other reviewing agencies (a copy of the cd will go to Mr. Ray Mazur at SWFWMD). It includes the updated "Potable Water Element" document that was prepared for the City by consulting firm Wade Trim and our adopted ordinance 7950-08 that amends the City's Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. > Prior to adoption of the EAR based amendments, we will making revisions in accordance with adopted ord. 7950-08 (Water Plan). , > If you have any questions or problems opening any of the other documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. > Thank you for your patience and consideration. > > Sandra E. Herman > Planner III > Planning Department > City of Clearwater, Florida > 100 South Myrtle Avenue > Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 > PO Box 4748, 33758-4748 > Telephone: (727) 562-4586 > Fax: (727) 562-4865 > sandra.herman@myclearwater.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: All E-mail sent to or from this address are public record and archived. 11/5/2008 Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:59 AM To: 'jason.mickel@swfwmd.state.fl.us' Subject: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Mr. Mickel, The files referenced below are too large to send by email so I'll be mailing them to you. Sandy Herman -----Original Message----- From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:22 PM To: 'Jason.Mickel@SW FW MD.State.FL.US' Subject: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Mr. Mickel, Good morning. The attached document for 08-2AR should open now for you. We apologize that it was not included on your CDROM copy. Since we transmitted this EAR Based amendment package, on September 18, 2008, the City adopted ordinance no. 7950- 08 (DCA 08-RWSP-1) that incorporates the Water Master Plan into the Utilities Element. It includes the changes as per your direction in working with Rob Fahey, Clearwater Engineering Manager, and also the Water projects from the new FY2008/09 CIP schedule that was adopted on Sept. 18, 2008. As it is too large to email, tomorrow I will overnight (Fed Ex) to you the file that is being mailed out today to DCA and the other reviewing agencies (a copy of the cd will go to Mr. Ray Mazur at SWFWMD). It includes the updated "Potable Water Element" document that was prepared for the City by consulting firm Wade Trim and our adopted ordinance 7950-08 that amends the City's Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Prior to adoption of the EAR based amendments, we will making revisions in accordance with adopted ord. 7950-08 (Water Plan). If you have any questions or problems opening any of the other documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your patience and consideration. Sandra E. Herman Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756=5520 PO Box 4748, 33758-4748 Telephone: (727) 562-4586 Fax: (727) 562-4865 sandra.herman@myclearwater.com • Herman, Sandra From: Herman, Sandra Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:22 PM To: 'Jason.Mickel@SWFWMD. State. FL. US' Subject: FW: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Mr. Mickel, Good morning. The attached document for 08-2AR should open now for you. We apologize that it was not included on your CDROM copy. Since we transmitted this EAR Based amendment package, on September 18, 2008, the City adopted ordinance no. 7950- 08 (DCA 08-RWSP-1) that incorporates the Water Master Plan into the Utilities Element. It includes the changes as per your direction in working with Rob Fahey, Clearwater Engineering Manager, and also the Water projects from the new FY2008/09 CIP schedule that was adopted on Sept. 18, 2008. As it is too large to email, tomorrow I will overnight (Fed Ex) to you the file that is being mailed out today to DCA and the other reviewing agencies (a copy of the cd will go to Mr. Ray Mazur at SWFWMD). It includes the updated "Potable Water Element' document that was prepared for the City by consulting firm Wade Trim and our adopted ordinance 7950-08 that amends the City's Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Prior to adoption of the EAR based amendments, we will making revisions in accordance with adopted ord. 7950-08 (Water Plan). If you have any questions or problems opening any of the other documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your patience and consideration. E5CA FT I L?ij EAR Appendix ] Final- CLW-Pota... Sandra E. Herman Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 PO Box 4748, 33758-4748 Telephone: (727) 562-4586 Fax: (727) 562-4865 sandra.herman@myclearwater.com 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWAT ER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 23, 2008 Jason Mickel Senior Planner Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 RE: City of Clearwater 08-2AR Dear Jason, 1? y1 Y f ' Again, we appreciate that you let us know that Appendix J file for this submittal would not open. Enclosed are two CD ROM's: One of the CD's is Appendix J, entitled "Potable Water Element". This draft document was prepared by consulting firm Wade Trim assisting the City on the recent amendment to incorporate the Water Master Plan into the Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan (DCA No. 08-RWSP-1). The second CD labeled: "DCA No. 08-RWSP-1" is the recently adopted comprehensive plan amendment (City Ordinance No. 7950-08) that incorporates the City's Water Master Plan into the Utilities Element. There is an updated "Potable Water Element" document within this submittal. The amendments to the Comprehensive Plan made by adopted ordinance no. 7950-08 (Water Plan) will be incorporated into the EAR based amendments prior to adoption of the latter. If you have any questions or problems opening these CD's, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4586 or sandra_herman4myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Sandra Herman Planner III CC: Ray Eubanks, Department of Community Affairs Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Planning Director Jim Quinn, Department of Environmental Protection r/e °EQuAI, EMPIAYMENT AMU AFFIRMATIVE AcTU)M EMPLOYER" • • . Page 1 of 1 Herman, Sandra From: Jessica L. Lunsford (Jessica@tbrpc.org] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:04 PM To: Herman, Sandra Cc: ray.eubanks@dca.state.fl.us; Bernard. Piawah@dca.state.fl. us; Valerie.James@dca.state.fl.us -Subject: Clearwater 08-1 ER Attached you will find the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's review (no comments) of the City of Clearwater's proposed EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments, 08-1 ER. The report will be an agenda item for Council consideration at the Monday, November 10, 2008 Council meeting. Jessica L. Lunsford Sr. Planner Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Phone: 727/570-5151 ext. 38 Fax: 727/570-5118 10/17/2008 • • Agenda Item 0.11.5 11/10/08 Tampa Say.Regronal Plannmy Caanc/1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED EAR-BASED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#08-1ER Description: Pursuant to Section 163.3191(10), FS, the City of Clearwater has submitted its Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments. The following is a sampling of the EAR-based amendments: Future Land Use Element Objective A.1.2• Population densities (inel ded in the Coastal Management Element and the Future Land Use Map) in the coastal storm areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property except for specific areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, in which case densities identified in Beach by Design shall govern. All densities in the coastal storm area and shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Emergency Mana eg_ment uu?eane Evae atie Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study Plan and shat be ... ntainea of deer-ease Policy A.1.2.1: The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodation uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. PPolicy A.1.2.2: Continue to cooperate with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and Pinellas County to meet the regional objectives for evacuation of permanent populations as well as other emergency concerns. A.2.2.7: The City will provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Local Housing Assistance Plan and implemented through the City's Community Development Code. GOAL A.5: The City of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a Citywide design structure comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The Citywide design structure will serve as a For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 1 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the City uniquely Clearwater. Objective A.5.1: Establish the Hierarchy of Place Objective A.5.2: Define linkages Objective A.5.3: Use the city-wide design structure as a guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the City of Clearwater. Objective A.5.4: Use the Citywide design structure as a guide to support redevelopment of properties along important corridors. Objective A.5.5: Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. Obiective A.5.6: Use Public Art ad Design Program to contribute to Clearwater's visual identity, create memorable images of the city for visitors and residents, reinforce Cl_earwater's role as an emerging regional leader in culture, recreation and environmental management and the City's reputation as a wonderful place to live, earn, work and play. GOAL A.6: The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources, ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and encourage infill development. Policv A.6.1.2: Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged throuah the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified eographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A nreliminarv Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Objective A.6.3: The City shall encourage the implementation of historic overlay districts the maintenance of existing historic properties, and the preservation of existing neighborhoods through the use of design guidelines and the implementation of the City's Community Development Code. Objective A.6.5: The City shall encourage improved land use compatibility through the evaluation of traffic calming techniques, multi-modal transportation networks, and the use of transit oriented development planning. Policy A.6.9.3: Develop incentives for LEED-certified and FGBC-certified buildings. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 2 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 9 Transportation Element Policy B.1.4.4: The City shall explore transportation concurrence alternatives, such as Multi- modal Transportation Districts (MMTDs), for downtown, Clearwater Beach and/or other potential redevelopment areas or activity centers to incorporate community design features that reduce vehicular usage while supporting an integrated multi-modal transportation system. Policy B.1.4.6: When a development results in traffic generation volumes causing a degradation of service below D in the pm peak hour, the City shall require transportation facilities to be in place or under actual construction within 3-years after issuance of a building permit in accordance with the City's Proportionate Fair Share Program. Objective B.1.7: The natural, recreational, scenic, historic, and cultural resources of the Courtney Campbell Causeway shall be preserved and enhanced for the City of Clearwater residents. Policy B.3.2.2: Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts, where applicable, for future high- speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. Housing Element Policy C.1.1.7: The City shall further the og al of providing a variety of housing choices by encouraging land assembly where possible, through such things as density bonuses, height increases, and setback reductions. Policy C.1.1.8: Consider accessory dwelling units wherever they can be accommodated by adequate lot area and provided they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.2.6: The City shall identify vacant and under-utilized city-owned property that may be deemed surplus property and make it available for the development of affordable housing. Policy C.1.2.7: The City shall work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation and local government bodes to protect dedicated affordable housing revenues as provided by the Economic Development and Housing Department's 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document, the Sadowski Act, and Federal, State and Local Government Housing Trust Funds. Objective C.1.9: The City of Clearwater shall be proactive in incentivizing the construction of affordable housing. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 3 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • Objective C.1.10: Recognizing that sustainable building techniques contribute to keening housing units affordable over the long term by reducing energy consumption, lowering utility bills and decreasing maintenance costs, the City of Clearwater will promote the use of green housing construction, renovation, and rehabilitation. Objective C.1.11: Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other organizations to see an end to homelessness. Utilities Element Stormwater Minor changes only. Solid Waste Minor changes only. Stormwater Minor changes only. Potable Water & Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Policy D.5.5.8: When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs at the locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7) years the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications. Coastal Management Policy E.1.6.2: The City will encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities. Policy E.1.6.3: The City discourages the rezoning of recreational and commercial working waterfronts. Policy E.1.6.4: The City will support accessory transient marina docks and slips through the Community Development Code and special area plans. Policy E.3.1.3: Limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high- hazard areas except for restoration or enhancement of natural resources. Policy E.3.1.4: Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities of the Future Land Use Element. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 4 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • GOAL EA: The City shall accomplish post-disaster redevelopment in a manner that shall minimize public and private vulnerability to future disasters. GOAL E.5: The preservation of economic activity within the Coastal Storm Area is a priority for the City. Conservation Element Policy F.1.2.3: The City shall support the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for impaired water and its implementation as appropriate within the City. Policy F.1.2.10: Monitor and enforce City requirements for treatment ponds and environmental mitigation sites. Policy F.1.7.5: Provide education programs to encourage preservation of the natural environment and promote the use of "Florida friendly" and drought tolerant vegetation and ground cover in an effort to conserve water. Policy F.2.1.10: The City will encourage the use of "Low Impact Development" techniques for stormwater management, such as minimal land disturbance, the preservation of native vegetation, and the minimization of impervious cover, through site plan and internal processes. Recreation and Open Space Minor changes only. Intergovernmental Coordination Policy H.1.1.7: The City shall strengthen coordination with other municipalities, the MPO, Pinellas County and FDOT to establish, measure, and maintain the level of service standards for roadways in the Strategic Intermodal System (U.S. 19) and other State and Country Roads. Policy H.1.1.10: The City shall strengthen the level of coordination with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), Pinellas County, and other municipalities to promote the concept of livable neighborhoods. Policy H.1.1.11: The City shall establish specific policies to provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas County, other cities, the Tampa Bay For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 5 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 Regional Planning Council, and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. Capital Improvements Element Minor changes only. Public School Facilities No changes. • Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that by their breadth and scope, the EAR- based amendments will directly or indirectly be related to or impact regionally significant resources and facilities. • Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No. • Effects of the amendment on the following issues: • Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: The EAR-based amendments appear to be compatible with local plans. • Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Potable water within the City of Clearwater is provided by 23 City-operated fresh water wells (19 active and 4 inactive) and seven interconnects with the Pinellas County water system. Pinellas County water is purchased by the City of Clearwater through an intergovernmental agreement as a means to augment the City's groundwater sources and to meet the City's water demands. Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: The City has adopted a number of policies that address how the City will encourage the building of more affordable housing. Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: The City's EAR-based amendments include policies that support the protection of natural resources of regional significance located within the City's Planning Area including LULC wet and dry, pine flatwoods, and FNAI Coastal and Wetland Communities. For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Staff Contact: Report prepared October 17, 2008 6 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable to the proposed amendment. Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities including, but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: The City has many new policies that address transportation issues. The EAR-based amendments identify improvements that will increase capacity on McMullen Booth Road. In addition, policies address consistency with FDOT's minimum levels of service for roadway facilities, transit service, high speed rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, concurrency management, and Multi-modal transportation systems. • In addition, multi-modal transportation improvements are being planned to help alleviate congestion and parking issues on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. The City will also consider Multi-modal Transportation Districts for downtown and the beach. • Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: The City has adopted the required policies addressing the CHHA/Coastal Storm Area and evacuation clearance times. • Regional Comments: None. • Applicable SRPP Policies: The additions and revisions contained in the proposed amendment were found to be supportive of and further the goals and policies of the SRPP's five subject areas. • Consistency with SRPP: For Council meeting of November 10, 2008 Report prepared October 17, 2008 Consistent. Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 ;a o 0 c o = c? b cL O ?• 0 0 J ? fD N O O 00 ti O N O O OC 00 r, C ? J m° x W n. 00 City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan 2008 ..«• ...:.................................., Coastal Storm Area i (including Coastal High ciIf ?..?. Hazard Area) Mex,co ..ra csaw a i °A •' ,/ E 1 Map N: Date: 711712008 84841 oW4p« snrr.uc Tmp Bar fl•pbrW%wiln 'Y y Soarca: Pb.F-C•umy I. leCe Y 8 ^r• This is represpriatbr? Dory For ,Pleat. e inforniafon ra4v W Plnelles awnwsrr»r« w Coenly Pla-g Q r Legend .....•''=O i i - Fkod Zone VE (FEMA Veloaty Zana) sr F',,; w«s, Evacuation Level A (Coastal High Hazard Area - CHHA) y .? enrrrr • - < Parcels where Cat 1 SWnn Surges p? • 1 . _ a ................. greater Nan a equal b 20% o' the r-C g µ r E S Pte, w Nom Portions of an mmls rs ane C/? O ' 4 i Y 8 not nwrdakd u,e Cad 1 Sage. I..q Areas of FEMA Veboty Zone not included } t` g @ "O1?"°"° in Evacuation Level A. Indudes Na &*a Il?cyy M a ,muff, «, *•?• s• parral where VIE Zane is greeter than or W?y O equal b 217% of the parcel. W P A v ao L- Locabns abp tlw Clearwater Say Slurs Clearwater Pt.-Ing Area A - Outside Clearwater City Limits ^! . I; T ?>. ar $ {: rm,nK.,rc oesrwr • s' ps., ro w. ww w=. ,p^'?"^'• ,rmb., ? mrrt •. •. e ? _ g r•.r.•«. , 3 c ' Clearwater_ -A. :: .... var..+..•,.w.•..?.«r ••.•+.•r«a • • ? o 'v ? n T o arD O ?ac 0 0 c? z ? o rD N O ? O 00 ti O N O O 00 r? r?i! Y try. M O x w .. or 1 `f Guu of Mex,co 10, ??Sa?MN A .r«c+x' s ?? ® Fxrrww.v Yxaa.. xavm,unwa It Y ? ? y R s' raurrro ??? i Y ? Sr it ?r ?#F artwSt Ckl?vwaror ? aEarwr ? ? cwr m?x.r ww ? % - ? txv ? 'M• axm y 9mrp :...p C 3 H ? ?ur a '........ .,.... s Hurricane Storm Surge Areas Map K: E-2 Date: 711812008 Source: T- Bay Raebnal Pkuml g.Coundl I ray 3006 Law nd Storm Surge Areas Storm Category o l 02 3 4 05 Clearwater Planting Area Outside Cteawwter City Limits ? ??n? `atw G ?• 1 1 A ? l Z ^S ? M A PD x"! • i x -1 -11 o n o 'v = a n. O ?O O O' "z J ? O N O ? C 00 1 O N C C OC 0 n F•? L. V: M Q ?t- O M w 00 .. w..rw X Gull MoxfeO i> Yo ouXCOw saw,nM' ? ? aeo sr. .....°.°.. x o? a br ? < o ; :x `fir ? ? -_??,??. ? • @ N l?? s !' . i /-AIR Y ? wn.. m na mw ? ? anro ....... .....`....: - • TANGO ' / ?, ?:,.:. ......................... .......... Floodplains sq ?.. rxoaXnn Map 0: A-10 Date: 711712008 Source: FEMA I May 2005 L ocion t Flood Hazard Areas Zone A 1100yn FLOOD NO BASE ELEV DIET AE 110Dyr FLOOD- BASE ELEV DET. f/, AD I100yr FLOOD- I-8 (FLOWING) UNDEVELOPED COASTAL HARRIERS VF /COASTAL FLOOD AREA %500 1500 YR FLOOD AREA 6 AREA OUTSIDE 500 YR FLOOD ,.: Clearwater Planning Area 1 Outside Clearwater City Limts Clearwater, ?---? 6 5[alm X.TA. wsc e.e u.mr w.ua.. w.,?.w. 1 an py A7 ?R A • • ? o o n o .D c rD ?. O ?.. Do ° o n z ^' O J < N ? O ? oc, 1 O N C-i 00 r-. N h rn nC O '-h m° x w 00 Map I: A-3 Date: W18!2008 Source: Pik"m Mwwu lg CouwJ I Jw 2XI F- L arld Use Categories RegtlalW.W W-J the RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE RS RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN RL RESIDENTIAL LOW RU RESIDENTIAL. URBAN WI I" RESIDENTIAL LOW MEDIUM RM RESIDENTIAL TEDIUM RH RESIDENTIAL HIGH ia1 RAY- RESOENTIAUOFFICE LIMITED RAG RESIDENTWPoFFICE GENERAL RKIR- REIDENTIAL/OFFICEMRETAIL RFH RESORT FACILITIES HIGH CN - COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CL - COMMERCIAL LIMITED CG- COMMERCW. GENERA. CBD - CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ""T' IL INDUSTRIAL LUTED IG- INDUSTRIAL GENERAL. Lunn Supw P PRESERVATION RMS-RECRFATIOWOPEN SMCE INS INSTITUTIONAL TN TRANSPORTATIOWILITY Spada! D..W fi- CRD-GOM.NNITY REDEVELOPNEN7 DISTRICT Pinellas Plannng C --A Water Feature O-Wy outside ck,.-wr City Lamle ?J 1"P 0 I" r3 r? p7 • 0 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER December 18, 2008 Present: Frank Hibbard George N. Cretekos John Doran Carlen Petersen Paul Gibson Mayor Vice-Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Also present: William B. Horne II Jill S. Silverboard Rod Irwin Pamela K. Akin Cynthia E. Goudeau Rosemarie Call City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Management Analyst The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The invocation was offered by Pastor Pam Smith of Grace Lutheran Church. The Mayor led the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. 4 - Presentations: 4.1. Home of the Quarter, Business of the Quarter, and Neighborhood of the Quarter The Neighborhood of the Quarter was presented to Northwood West. The Home of the Quarter was presented to Scott & Pam Williams at 622 Fairmont Street, Bruce & Melody Hause at 700 S. Prospect Avenue, John & Sheila Poling at 1475 Misty Plateau Trail and William & Linda Spencer at 1896 Murray Avenue. The Business of the Quarter was presented to Greektown Grille, 1230 Cleveland Street. 4.2. Human Rights Week Proclamation, December 8-12, 2008 4.3. National Homeless Persons Memorial Day Proclamation, December 2.1, 2008 5 - Approval of Minutes 5.1 Aoorove the minutes of the December 4, 2008 city Council Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. Councilmember Petersen moved to approve the minutes of the December 4, 2008, City Council Meeting as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Councilmember. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 6 - Citizens to be Heard re Items Not on the Agenda - None Council 2008-12-18 • • the opportunity to request a time extension from City Council extending through the 2015 date. The proposed amended Development Agreement also requires the City to consider (but not necessarily adopt) amendments to the previously approved vacation ordinances that expire in March 2010 if vertical construction has not commenced. The Community Development Board reviewed this Development Agreement application at its public hearing on October 21, 2008, and unanimously recommended approval of the application (DVA2008-00001). Following the CDB meeting, there have been changes to the Agreement negotiated by the City Attorney. Specifically, The Agreement has been changed to require commencement of the Project within three years and several other minor changes related to timing of commencement and the ability to have Concession on the beach and the related documents and provisions have been deleted. Ed Armstrong, representing the property owner, stated it is in the best interest of the City to approve the extension as it preserves the units from the density pool. In response to questions, Related Group representative Eric Fordham said Related is involved with negotiations and securing financing. Related is not marketing the property for sale. The partnership contract is not cancelable from either side unless the property is sold. Discussion ensued. Consensus was to support the extension of the development agreement for three years as it is in the best interest of the City to preserve the units from the density pool and will also result in additional parking spaces under a separate agreement. Councilmember Doran moved to approve amended and restated Development Agreement for property located at 100 Coronado, between K and P Clearwater Estate, LLC (the property owner) and the City of Clearwater (Case DVA2008-00001). The motion was duly seconded. Councilmembers Cretekos, Doran, Petersen and Mayor Hibbard voted "Aye," and Councilmember Gibson voted "Nay." Motion carried. Resolution 08-14 was presented and read by title only. Councilmember Cretekos moved to pass and adopt Resolution 08-14 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Cretekos, Petersen, Doran, and Hibbard "Nays": Gibson. Motion Carried. 8 - Second Readings - Public Hearing 8.1. Approve amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and according to comments from the Florida Department of Communitv Affairs (DCA) and adopt Ordinance 7993-08 on second reading Councilmember Petersen moved to amend Ordinance 7993-08 on second reading; see Exhibit 1. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Council 2008-12-18 10 10 10 Ordinance 7993-08 was presented for second reading as amended and read by title only. Councilmember Gibson moved to pass and adopt Ordinance 7993-08 on second and final reading as amended. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Cretekos, Petersen, Doran, Gibson, and Hibbard. "Nays": None. City Manager Reports 9 - Consent Agenda 9.1. Appoint Mr. Robert Going to a two-year term ending December 31, 2010 as a Trustee of the Clearwater Firefighters' Supplemental Trust Fund in accordance with Sec. 175.061 of the Florida State Statutes. (consent) 9.2. Approve an agreement between The Florida Commission on Community Service and the City of Clearwater renewing the AmeriCorps Clearwater program for the period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, including a cash match in the amount of $84,895 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 9.3. Accept a 385 square-foot Drainage and Utilities Easement conveyed by Robert C. and Susan K. Goodell, over, under and across a portion of Lot 18, Fair Oaks Subdivision first Addition, in consideration of receipt of $1.00 and the benefits to be derived therefrom. (consent) 9.4. Accept a 2,672 square-foot Sidewalk and Utilities Easement conveyed by Station Square Clearwater Condo, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, over, under and across a portion of Lot 4 and Lot 11, and the West 2 feet and 4 inches of Lot 12, Gould and Ewin-g's 1st and 2nd addition to Clearwater Harbor, Florida, -given in consideration of receipt of $1.00 and the benefits to be derived therefrom. (consent) 9.5. Approve filing third-party actions against design/build engineer Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc. (PBS and J), for contribution, indemnification and related causes of action for alleged wrongful design and/or construction of the Coronado Drive Improvement portion of the Beach by Design project in the case of Szlechta v. City and Rudman v. City: and approve filing suit against PBS andJ for alleged wrongful design and/or construction of the Coronado Drive Improvement portion of the Beach by Design project to seek contribution and/or indemnification for the costs of settlement incurred in the case of Tracey v. City. (consent) 9.6. Authorize instituting a civil action against Crimone Development Corporation to recover $1,817.23 for damage to City property. (consent) 9.7. Authorize instituting a civil action against Davis Construction Co. of Pinellas County to recover $1,665.62 for damage to City property. (consent) 9.8. Authorize instituting a civil action against Environmental Crossings, Inc., to recover $9,696.27 for damage to City property. (consent) Council 2008-12-18 11 • • CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER September 4, 2008 Present: Frank Hibbard George N. Cretekos John Doran Carlen Petersen Paul Gibson Also present: William B. Horne II Jill S. Silverboard Rod Irwin Pamela K. Akin Cynthia E. Goudeau Rosemarie Call Mayor Vice-Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Management Analyst The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The invocation was offered by Pastor Fred Ball of Skycrest United Methodist Church. The Mayor led the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. 4 - Presentations: - Given, except for 4.4 4.1. 2008 Legislative Session Report - Sen. Dennis Jones 4.2. Proclamation: Hispanic Heritage Month, 9115/08 -10/15/08 4.3. Yellow Ribbon Suicide Awareness and Prevention Week Proclamation. 9/7/08 - 9/13/08 4.4. Project Homeless Connect - Sarah Snyder & Rhonda Abbott, Homeless Leadership Network - cancelled 4.5. Proclamation: Somebodv Cares Tampa Bav Week. 9/21/08 - 9/27/08 4.6. Proclamation: September is United Way Month 5 - Approval of Minutes 5.1. Approve the minutes of the August 21. 2008 Citv Council Meetino as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. Councilmember Petersen moved to approve the minutes of the August 21, 2008, City Council Meeting as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Councilmember. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Council 2008-09-04 Councilmember Doran moved to approve the recommended Penny for Pinellas II project list, as revised, for Fiscal Years 2008109 through 2009/2010. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 7.5. Approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and pass Ordinance 7993-08 on first reading. Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The City of Clearwater's EAR, prepared in 2005/06, was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are proposed to be adopted by the end of 2008. The 2006 EAR was divided into five parts: 1) Part I: Introduction; 2) Part ll: Statutory Issues Assessment; 3) Part III: Issues of Local Concern; 4) Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element; and 5) Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR- based amendments. A total of five issues of local concern were identified: 1) How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment; 2) How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character and livable neighborhoods; 3) How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock; 4) How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation; and 5) How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management. The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) met nine times for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. Their final meeting was on July 30, 2008. On August 4, 2008, staff presented the item to the City Council for general discussion and comments. On August 26, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB) held a public hearing on proposed Ordinance 7993-08. Any additional recommendations made by the CDB will be presented to the Council. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 7993-08 amending the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. This is considered a large-scale amendment that requires approval by DCA. The CAC and staff were thanked for their efforts. Councilmember Cretekos moved to approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Ordinance 7993-08 was presented for first reading and read by title only. Councilmember Gibson moved to pass Ordinance 7993-08 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Cretekos, Petersen, Doran, Gibson, and Hibbard. "Nays": None. Council 2008-09-04 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER August 21, 2008 Present: Frank Hibbard George N. Cretekos John Doran Carlen Petersen Paul Gibson Also present: William B. Horne II Jill S. Silverboard Rod Irwin Pamela K. Akin Cynthia E. Goudeau Mayor Vice-Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. Vice-Mayor Cretekos offered the invocation. The Mayor led the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. 4 - Presentations: - Given 4.1. 2008 Legislative Session Report - Rep. Peter Nehr 4.2. Home of the Quarter, Neighborhood of the Quarter and Business of the Quarter: Summer 2008 Neighborhood of the Quarter: Village on the Green Condo II, Homes of the Quarter: Joanne Marolda 913 E. Pines Street; Willie & Ethel Faison, 1482 Byram Drive; Peter & Donna Leach, 1715 Sunset Drive; and Carl Korczak, 1340 Howard Street; Business Beautification Recognition Award: TMJ Enterprises, 1460 S. Missouri Avenue. 4.3. Veterans' Day Celebration Update - Bob Swick 4.4. Clearwater Housing Authority Presentation Bob Aude, Chair, provided an update on the Housing Authority's programs. 4.5. Nagano Exchange Program - Margo Walbolt, Cultural Affairs Manager 5 - Approval of Minutes 5.1. Approve the minutes of the August 7, 2008 City Council Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. Council 2008-08-21 "Ayes": Cretekos, Petersen, Doran, Gibson, and Hibbard. "Nays": None. 7.3. Continue amendment to the Community Development Code to permit sandwich board signs in certain areas to September 18, 2008. Consensus was for sandwich board signs only to be permitted in downtown. AND 7.4. Continue Approval of Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) to September 4, 2008. Councilmember Petersen moved to continue Items 7.3 and 7.4 to September 4, 2008. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 8 - Second Readings - Public Hearing 8.1. Adopt Ordinance 7964-08 on second reading, changing the parameters and procedures for settling minor claims. Ordinance 7964-08 was presented for second reading and read by title only. Councilmember Doran moved to pass and adopt Ordinance 7964-08 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Cretekos, Petersen, Doran, and Gibson. "Nays": None. Absent: Hibbard. 8.2. Adopt Ordinance 7965-08 on second reading, amending Section 2.641 - 2.647, Code of Ordinances, relating to the Self Insurance Program, making procedural changes and name changes. Ordinance 7965-08 was presented for second reading and read by title only. Councilmember Gibson moved to pass and adopt Ordinance 7965-08 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Cretekos, Petersen, Doran, Gibson, and Hibbard. "Nays": None. 8.3. Adopt Ordinance 7983-08 on second reading, increasing certain fees for the use of recreation facilities by nonresidents and modifying the formulas for charging nonresident recreation fees. Council 2008-08-21 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER August 26, 2008 Present: Dana K. Tallman Jordan Behar Frank L. Dame Richard Adelson Norma R. Carlough Acting Chair Board Member Board Member Board Member Acting Board Member Absent: Nicholas C. Fritsch Chair Thomas Coates Vice Chair Doreen DiPolito Board Member Also Present: Gina Grimes Attorney for the Board Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Michael L. Delk Planning Director Catherine Porter Planning Manager Robert Tefft Development Review Manager Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter The meeting was called to order at 1:02 p.m. at City Hall. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. Member Dame moved to appoint Member Tallman as Acting Chair. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Acting Chair Tallman offered the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: July 15, 2008 Member Dame moved to approve the minutes of the regular Community Development Board meeting of July 15, 2008, as submitted in written summation to each member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (to September 16,2008): (Item 1) Community Development 2008-08-26 • • beneficial relationship between the uses of land and buildings and the circulation of traffic throughout the City, with particular regard for safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian traffic movement (CDC Section 1-103.E.4). At its meeting of August 6, 2008, the DDB (Downtown Development Board) reviewed the proposed ordinance and recommended a few changes to the approval criteria for sandwich board signs. These comments, which dealt with allowable materials, attachments and sponsorships/advertisements, have been incorporated into the current ordinance language. The Clearwater Chamber of Commerce has been provided with a copy of the proposed text amendment to receive their input; however, to date no comments have been received. The proposed amendments to the Community Development Code are consistent with and will further the goals of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends approval of Ordinance 7997-08 that amends the Community Development Code. In response to questions, Development Review Manager Robert Tefft said a Planning Department review process will determine if proposed signs meet established criteria. There are no concrete examples of correct signage to reference. Signage will not be limited to restaurants. It was hoped the signage could feature sufficient adverting to help improve downtown retail business. Member Behar moved to recommend approval of Case TA2008-07003 based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 4. Pulled from Consent Agenda Level Three Application Case: CPA2007-06003 - Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City as adopted on May 18, 2000, and subsequently amended, by amending the Table of Contents and all elements of the comprehensive plan, making substantial changes to the elements based on the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Comprehensive Plan, and making minor editorial changes, in accordance with Florida Statutes. Type of Amendment: Large Scale Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Sandra E. Herman, Planner III This item involves amending the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, making substantive changes as recommended in the City's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) in accordance with the Florida State Statutes and Florida Administrative Code. Florida Statutes require local governments to adopt comprehensive plan amendments consistent with their approved EAR every seven years. The City of Clearwater's latest EAR was prepared in 2005/06 with the assistance of consulting firm Wade Trim as well as the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). The City's EAR was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on November 29, 2006. The EAR-based amendments are required to be processed as a large-scale plan amendment and adopted by the end of 2008. Community Development 2008-08-26 10 _J6 0 0 The 2006 EAR was divided into five parts: 1) Part I: Introduction; 2) Part II: Statutory Issues Assessment; 3) Part III: Issues of Local Concern; 4) Part IV: Success and Shortcomings of Each Comprehensive Plan Element; and 5) Part V: Changes in Florida Statutes. Statutory changes and issues of local concern were identified in the EAR to be addressed through EAR- Based Amendments. The EAR identified a total of five issues of local concern: 1) How can the City develop a comprehensive and diversified strategy for the City's redevelopment; 2) How does the City provide guidance to enhance community character and livable neighborhoods; 3) How does the City develop and implement a proactive approach to facilitate attainable housing and assure safety and competitiveness of the aging housing stock; 4) How can the City develop and implement a strategy to eliminate enclaves and facilitate annexation; and 5) How does the City implement an approach to coastal and disaster management. On April 4, 2007, the City Council appointed a new CAC for the purpose of providing public participation in the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. The new CAC included several of the members of the CAC that worked on the EAR. The committee met nine times, primarily concentrating on the EAR issues of local concern. The CAC also reviewed the statutory and editorial changes that are included in the proposed amendments as Ordinance 7993-08. Notes from the CAC meetings are on file and may be accessed on the City's website. The City Council reviewed this item at their work session meeting on August 4, 2008 and made recommendations that are in the ordinance, including retaining the current wellhead protection policy as recommended by the CAC. A document identifying each change and the source of the change has been prepared. The ordinance has an exhibit that includes changes to the text and maps within the elements (without citations). Data and analysis will be submitted to DCA with these documents as required by Florida Administrative Code 9J-5 Rule. The proposed text amendment meets State Statutes and rules by amending current Goals, Objectives and Policies of all of the elements of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the City's 2006 EAR and includes minor editorial changes. Ordinance 7993-08, which amends the Comprehensive Plan of the City, includes substantive and minor editorial changes to the Table of Contents and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements, including maps within the elements, as recommended in the EAR. The substantive amendments involve updates as recommended by the EAR, and editorial such changes as updates to years given for projects, minor text changes and typographical and/or grammatical corrections. Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603(F) no amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: 1) The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. The proposed amendment further refines the City's existing policies and objectives. The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing goals, objectives, and policies contained in the comprehensive plan; 2) The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; 3) The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in questions and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The proposed amendment is a text Community Development 2008-08-26 11 .A amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property; 4) Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property; 5) The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. The proposed amendment seeks to provide consistent and coordinated efforts for the processes and procedures for preserving and enhancing the natural environment in coordination with other agencies such as Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Tampa Bay Water (TBA) within several of the elements including Conservation, Coastal Management and Future Land Use as recommended in the EAR; and 6) The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. The proposed amendment is a text amendment (includes maps within the elements) that is not directly related to a specific property. The purpose of this amendment is to amend the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, amending the Table of Contents and the Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Utilities, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvements, and Public School Facilities Elements, making substantive changes as recommended in the EAR, and editorial changes, pursuant to Florida Statutes and the Rules of the Florida Administrative Code. The Planning Department staff recommends approval of Ordinance 7993-08 that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Staff will verify the wording of the City's Vision Statement. Discussion ensued regarding a suggestion that the City's Mission Statement be expanded to reflect necessary responses to economic changes. It was commented that the need to adjust to economic changes is inferred and that "Quality of Life" is relative to current economic conditions. For consistency, it was recommended that language referencing median landscaping be modified. Senior Planner Sandra Herman reviewed two additions to the transportation improvement program. Acting Member Carlough moved to recommend approval of Case CPA2007-06003 with modifications proposed by Planning Staff and to eliminate the word "beautifully" on page A19, Item A535, based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. The motion was duly seconded and?carriedunanimously. F. ADJOURN: The meeting adjourned at 1:52 p.m. Commu 'ty Developrxfent Board., t st: 7-)fid,5Z Board Repo e Community Development 2008-08-26 12 Tampa Bay.Regional Planning Council C? air Commissioner Biff Dodson January 29, 2009 Vice-C? air Secretarrp/Treasurer Commissioner Jack Mariano Jiff Collins Ms. Sandra E. Herman Planner III City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Herman: Executive Director MannN Pumarie9a Enclosed is a copy of the Council's review of the City of Clearwater's adopted comprehensive plan amendment, DCA#08-1 ER. The report will be an agenda item for Council consideration at the Monday, February 9, 2009, Council meeting, which will begin at 10:00 a.m. Please do not hesitate to contact Jessica Lunsford, Sr. Planner, at ext. 38 if more information or clarification concerning the contents of the report is needed. Sincerely, Manny L. Pumariega, AICP Executive Director Enclosure 400o Gatewaq Centre Boutevard, Suite i oo • Pineffas Park FL 33782 Pb(Me: 727-570-5IS1 • Fax: 727-570-5118 • State Number: S 13-5066 • wwwtbrpc.ory • Agenda Item #3.H.28 02/09/09 Tampa SaYRegmnal Planning Counell LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED EAR-BASED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#08-1ER For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 1 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 2 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • Clearwater's Staff Responses to DCA's Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report, and Additional Changes Not Previously Reviewed A. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT: 1. LACK OF PLANNING TIMEFRAME: Response: As per discussion with DCA staff, Map A-3 changed to reflect the planning timeframe of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan of 2018. Population projections as well as the Future Land Use Element Introduction and Needs Summary were also revised to reflect the planning timeframe. 2. DENSITY BONUSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES Response: Revised Policy A.2.2.7 in consultation with DCA personnel for greater specificity as follows: A.2.2.7 The City will provide density bonuses for affordable housing developments that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the total units are reserved as affordable housing units. Such bonuses shall not exceed 50% of the density permitted by the Future Land Use Map and shall not include properties located in the Coastal Storm Area. The density bonus shall be established by ordinance in the Community Development Code. The City will pr-evide densi?y benuses to established in the City's I=eea4 14eusing Assistanee Plan and implemented thfough the City's Community Develepment Cede-. Response: Since density bonuses are covered by A.2.2.7., the following was revised in consultation with DCA personnel to support Objective C.1.10. C.1.10.1: Encourage affordable housing projects that are Constructed consistent with US Green Building Council's (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) principles or the Florida Green Building Coalition's (FGBC) Green Land Development and Building Standards. 3. OBJECTIVE A.4.1 AND POLICY A.4.1.1- REGARDING LOS FOR "TRAFFIC CIRCULATION" - REPLACE "TRAFFIC CIRULATION" WITH "ROADS". B. COASTAL EMEMENT 4. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA MAP E-1: THE COLORS USED IN THE LEGEND FOR THE EVACUATION AREAS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED FOR CLARITY. 5. PUBLIC EXPENDITURES WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA: Response: In consultation with DCA personnel, it was determined that Policy E.3.1.3 requires no changes as long as E.3.1.4 is revised as follows and that E 3.1.5 is added: E.3.1.4 Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 3 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 support of the pr-epesed densities permitted by the City's adopted of the Future Land Use Wit. Plan Map. E.3.1.5 The City's public expenditures in the CHHA, when available, will include program improvements that will restore and enhance natural resources. 6. OBJECTIVE E.1.2 AND POLICY 1.2.1 WERE CHANGED TO IDENTIFY THE CORRECT MAP NUMBER ON THE COASTAL STORM AREA MAP. POLICY E.3.1.4 SETS THE DATE OF 2012 BY WHICH THE POST DISASTER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOULD BE PREPARED. C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT: 7. LACK OF POTABLE WATER SUPPLY CONCURRENCY Response: Policy 1.1.3.2 is revised as per the ORC: 1.1.3.2 The City shall determine, prior to the issuance of development orders, whether sufficient capacity of essential public facilities to meet the minimum standards for levels of service for the existing population and a proposed development will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The applicable water supplier shall be consulted prior to the issuance of a building permit to ensure potable water will be available prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 8. LACK OF A 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Response: Due to overlapping time frames for submission of the EAR-based amendments and the annual Capital Improvements Element update, the City's six-year CIP schedule as adopted by the City Council on November 18, 2008, was submitted to DCA as a separate package on November 26, 2008. The schedule lists the projects by year and cites sources of funding, as well as references the applicable Comprehensive Plan GOP's. It is the opinion of Planning Staff that the Capital Improvements Element as submitted on November 26,2008 adequately addresses the concerns stated in Item C. However, as required by DCA personnel, we are submitting with this response a new table for the Data and Analysis section, (Table of Capital Improvements), the Traffic Operations Division's assessment spreadsheet for determining roadway improvements as well as the Revenues and Expenditures tables from the City Budget. 9. LACK OF ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT: Response: Revised Policy 1.1.3.7 to include a table summarizing level of service standards for CIE. 10. LACK OF CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS Response: Policy 1.1.3.3 Subsection 3 is being revised as follows to address FDOT's comment. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 4 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 ® 0 1.1.3.3 Subsection 3: For roads and mass transit, transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the City approves a building permit that results in traffic generation. The eeneur-fea be satisfied by *he '.firer:., .. ntai«e.7 in Pokey 32.3.3.1 Pokey 3 2 2 2 OF if-, in aFe publie faeflifies will be available to aeeeffiffiedate the impaet of the development. D. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: 11. LACK OF PLANNING TIMEFRAME ON MAPS: Response: The maps have been revised to reflect the appropriate planning timeframes. In addition, specific changes were made to some of the maps as indicated below: Map B-1: As per discussion with DCA staff, title block changed to more prominently reflect that these are Existing Levels of Service on major roads within the City, including those under State and County jurisdiction. Map B-2, B-3, and B-4: Added planning timeframe of 2018 to map title block. Map B-5: As per discussion with DCA staff, title block changed to more prominently reflect that these are Existing Functional Classifications. Map B-6 through Map B-12: Added planning timeframe of 2018 to map title block. 12. OBJECTIVE B.1.5 REGARDING REFERENCE TO THE STATE ROADWAYS AND POLICY B.1.5.5 REGARDING THE D LOS FOR US 19. Response: Objective B.1.5 has been revised as per DCA and FDOT comments: B.1.5 Objective - All County ate roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. Response: Policy B.1.5.5 has been revised as per DCA and FDOT comments: B.1.5.5 The City shall continue to participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to ensure that the level of service standard for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility is will be consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. E. HOUSING ELEMENT 13. DENSITY INCREASES/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS: Response: For consistency with Policy A.2.2.7, Policy C.1.9.1 has been changed as follows: For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 5 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 11 bi C.1.9.1 The City will provide density bonuses for affordable housing developments that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the total units are reserved as affordable housing nits. Such bonuses shall not exceed 50% of the density permitted by the Future Land Use Map and shall not include properties located in the Coastal Storm Area. The density bonus shall be established by ordinance in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.1.8 has been changed in consultation with DCA personnel as follows: C.1.1.8 The City may permit Conside one accessory dwelling units ep r lot wherever they such units can be accommodated by adequate lot area, and provided that they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Delete Policy C.1.9.4 as unnecessary due to revised Policy C.1.9.1 Delete Policies C.1.9.5 and A.6.1.12 as unnecessary due to revised Policy C.1.1.8 THE CITY OF CLEARWATER PROPOSES TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS TO THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES. THESE CHANGES ARE BASED ON COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENCIES, AS INDICATED. SOURCE: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL Add the following new policy to the Future Land Use Element: A.2.2.8 All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards contained in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules, including criteria and standards for nomenclature, continuum of plan classifications and categories, use and locational characteristics, map delineation, other standards, and special rules. SOURCE: LETTER FROM COUNTY 10/10/08. Make the following change to the Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.1.8: I.1.1.8 The City shall, in cooperation with Pinellas County as approved by the voters in March 1997, and extended in March 2007, maintain a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax (LGIS) for the purpose of supplementing current revenue sources in order to fund the capital improvements called for in this Plan. SOURCE: LETTER FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 9/11/08. Make the following change to new Policy H.1.1.11 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: H.1.1.11The City shall establish specific policies to provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas County, Pinellas County School Board, other cities, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/15/08. Make following changes to the Future Land Use Element: A. 4.1.2 For- the read links enufnefated in ihe Tr-anspef;tatiea Element, a tieFed level of sef:viee is established. The initial level of ser-,,,iee fef the per-pose of issuing de,,,elepmeat per-mits shall be 1 after- ifflpfe,.,emefits afe eaffiplete, eensistent with the eenstnietion initiation dates. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 6 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • A.4.1.2 A..4.1-3 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a), Florida Statutes. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/15/08. Add the following from the FDOT Adopted Work Program to the Transportation Element Objective B.2.3: • US Highway 19 From: N of Whitney Rd. To S of Seville Blvd. State Summary: Reconstruct US 19 w/Frontage Rd., Belleair Interchange • US Highway 19 From: S of Seville Blvd. To N of SR 60 State Summary: Reconstruct US 19 w/Frontage Rd., Seville Interchange SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/15/08. Policy 1.1.3.5.3 (c) iii of the Capital Improvements Element is amended as follows: iii. amend this Comprehensive Plan to modify the adopted standard for the level of service so as to reduce the required facility to equal the applicant's needs, excluding trategic Intermodal System (SIS), Federal Intrastate Hiahwav Svstem (FIRS). Transportation Reeional Impact Proiect (TRIP) funded state roads. SOURCE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT. In order to provide for consistency with amended policy D.1.1.1., the second, third and fourth bullets of the Utilities Needs Summary for Sanitary Sewer are amended as follows: • The minimum level of service standard is an average of 127 gallons per person per day (GPCD). The For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 7 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 E, • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 8 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 AMENDMENT #08-ER EAR-based Amendments Future Land Use Element r? Objective A.1.2• Population densities (inel ded i the Coastal " anagement Element and the Futur-e hand Use Map) in the coastal storm areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property except for specific areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, in which case densities identified in Beach by Design shall govern. All densities in the coastal storm area md shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Emergency Management ment Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study Planan shat be "' ntainea ^" deer-ease Policy A.1.2.1: The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodation uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. Policy A.1.2.2: Continue to cooperate with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and Pinellas County to meet the regional objectives for evacuation of permanent populations as well as other emergency concerns. A.2.2.7: The City will provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Local Housing Assistance Plan and implemented through the City's Community Development Code. GOAL A.S: The Citv of Clearwater shall identifv and utilize a Citvwide design structure comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The Citywide design structure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the City uniquely Clearwater. Obiective A.5.1: Establish the Hierarchy of Place Obiective A.5.2: Define linkages Obiective A.5.3: Use the city-wide design structure as a guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the City of Clearwater. Obiective A.5.4: Use the Citywide design structure as a guide to support redevelopment of properties along important corridors. Obiective A.5.5: Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. Obiective A.5.6: Use Public Art ad Design Program to contribute to Clearwater's visual identity, create memorable images of the city for visitors and residents, reinforce Clearwater's role as an emerging regional leader in culture, recreation and environmental management and the City's reputation as a wonderful place to live, earn, work and play. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 9 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 ? e GOAL A.6: The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources, ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and encourage infill development. Policy A.6.1.2: Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Objective A.6.3: The City shall encourage the implementation of historic overlay districts, the maintenance of existing historic properties, and the preservation of existing neighborhoods through the use of design guidelines and the implementation of the City's Community Development Code. Objective A.6.5: The City shall encourage improved land use compatibility through the evaluation of traffic calming techniques, multi-modal transportation networks, and the use of transit oriented development planning. Policy A.6.9.3: Develop incentives for LEED-certified and FGBC-certified buildings. Transportation Element Policy B.1AA The City shall explore transportation concurrency alternatives, such as Multi- modal Transportation Districts (MMTDs), for downtown, Clearwater Beach and/or other potential redevelopment areas or activity centers to incorporate community design features that reduce vehicular usage while supporting a_n integrated multi-modal transportationsystem. Policy B.1.4.6: When a development results in traffic generation volumes causing a degradation of service below D in the pm peak hour, the City shall require transportation facilities to be in place or under actual construction within 3-years after issuance of a building permit in accordance with the City's Proportionate Fair Share Program. Objective B.1.7: The natural, recreational, scenic, historic, and cultural resources of the Courtney Campbell Causeway shall be preserved and enhanced for the City of Clearwater residents. Policy B.3.2.2: Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts, where applicable, for future high-speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 10 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Housing Element Policy C.1.1.7: The City shall further the goal of providing a variety of housing choices by encouraging land assembly where possible, through such things as density bonuses, height increases, and setback reductions. Policy C.1.1.8: Consider accessory dwelling units wherever they can be accommodated by adequate lot area and provided they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.2.6: The City shall identify vacant and under-utilized city-owned property may be deemed surplus property and make it available for the development of affordable housing. Policy C.1.2.7: The City shall work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation and local government bodes to protect dedicated affordable housing revenues as provided by the Economic Development and Housing Department's 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document, the Sadowski Act, and Federal, State and Local Government Housing Trust Funds. Obiective C.1.9: The City of Clearwater shall be proactive in incentivizing the construction of affordable housing. Objective C.1.10: Recognizing that sustainable building techniques contribute to keeping housing units affordable over the long term by reducing energy consumption, lowering utility bills and decreasing maintenance costs, the City of Clearwater will promote the use of green housing construction, renovation, and rehabilitation. Objective C.1.11: Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other organizations to see an end to homelessness. Utilities Element Stormwater Minor changes only. Solid Waste Minor changes only. Stormwater Minor changes only. Potable Water & Natural Ground Water Aguifer Recharge Policy D.5.5.8: When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs at the locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7) years, the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 1 1 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Coastal Management Policy E.1.6.2: The City will encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities. Policy E.1.6.3: The City discourages the rezoning of recreational and commercial working waterfronts. Policy E.1.6.4: The City will support accessory transient marina docks and slips through the Community Development Code and special area plans. Policy E.3.1.3: Limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high-hazard areas except for restoration or enhancement of natural resources. E.3.1.4 AND E.3.1.5 Changed per ORC Report: E.3.1.4 Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities permitted by the City's adqpted ef4he Future Land Use Element-. Plan Map. E.3.1.5 The City's public expenditures in the CHHA, when available, will include program improvements that will restore and enhance natural resources. GOAL EA: The City shall accomplish post-disaster redevelopment in a manner that shall minimize public and rivate vulnerability to future disasters. GOAL E.5: The preservation of economic activity within the Coastal Storm Area is a priority for the City. Conservation Element Policy F.1.2.3: The City shall support the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for impaired water and its implementation as appropriate within the City. Policy F.1.2.10: Monitor and enforce City requirements for treatment ponds and environmental mitigation sites. Policy F.1.7.5: Provide education programs to encourage preservation of the natural environment and promote the use of "Florida friendly" and drought tolerant vegetation and ground cover in an effort to conserve water. Policy F.2.1.10: The City will encourage the use of "Low Impact Development" techniques for stormwater management, such as minimal land disturbance, the preservation of native vegetation, and the minimization of impervious cover, through site plan and internal processes. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 12 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Recreation and Open Space Minor changes only. Intergovernmental Coordination Policy H.1.1.7: The City shall strengthen coordination with other municipalities, the MPO, Pinellas County and FDOT to establish, measure, and maintain the level of service standards for roadways in the Strategic Intermodal System (U.S. 19) and other State and Country Roads. Policy H.1.110: The City shall strengthen the level of coordination with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Tampa Bav Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), Pinellas County, and other municipalities to promote the concept of livable neighborhoods. Policy H.1.1.11: The City shall establish specific policies to provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas County, other cities, the Tampa BU Regional Planning Council, and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. Capital Improvements Element Minor changes only. Public School Facilities No changes. • Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that by their breadth and scope, the EAR-based amendments will directly or indirectly be related to or impact regionally significant resources and facilities. • Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No. • Effects of the amendment on the following issues: • Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: The EAR-based amendments appear to be compatible with local plans. • Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Potable water within the City of Clearwater is provided by 23 City-operated fresh water wells (19 active and 4 inactive) and seven interconnects with the Pinellas County water system. Pinellas County water is purchased by the City of Clearwater through an intergovernmental agreement as a means to augment the City's groundwater sources and to meet the City's water demands. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 13 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 ? e Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: The City has adopted a number of policies that address how the City will encourage the building of more affordable housing. Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: The City's EAR-based amendments include policies that support the protection of natural resources of regional significance located within the City's Planning Area including LULC wet and dry, pine flatwoods, and FNAI Coastal and Wetland Communities. Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities including, but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: The City has many new policies that address transportation issues. The EAR-based amendments identify improvements that will increase capacity on McMullen Booth Road. Policies also address consistency with FDOT's minimum levels of service for roadway facilities, transit service, high speed rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, concurrency management, and Multi-modal transportation systems. In addition, multi-modal transportation improvements are being planned to help alleviate congestion and parking issues on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. The City will also consider Multi-modal Transportation Districts for downtown and the beach. • Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: The City has adopted the required policies addressing the CHHA/Coastal Storm Area and evacuation clearance times. • Regional Comments: None. • Applicable SRPP Policies: The additions and revisions contained in the proposed amendment were found to be supportive of and further the goals and policies of the SRPP's five subject areas. • Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 14 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 ? Q O ? O .Ly C ti 7 t•p r r n. ? City • Comprehensive 11: A: O ,T,) O? Q' w Jtf tI::SMAN s: d? JJI. _ r ...' i '•. §f ? ? ? c' it ?. a , ??k h ? ? wv.,cl„w Ka . u r t w.. rva. su tr ?rv n o u : t.. nuue w n. Nuwer,n v N ? Y jl?. - V W,4lfrl olS,tan A'W! s, e,.r/ ..V N1, tl,n 0. - .. ?....u°-wW •7X}`?. t [, l r[uUd r ,w, ?! ,o.. Ci7 0 W n 00 Coastal Storm Area (Including Coastal High Hazard Area) Map p: E-1 Date: 711712008 3oun,a: hope Bay Regi-I Planning Caudl pi.a. Cgrnly I Jan 2M 'Ites mays reprosw,t[nronal Dory. For canplele nlwnraew? ielw lu Pinellas Courtly Planning. Legend Flood Zwe VE (FEMA Velocity Zone) Evacuation Level A (Coastal High Hazard Area - CHHA) Parcels where Cal I Stmt Surge is greater than w equal 10 20% of the parcel, or tlwso pwions of an W&A not inundated by the Cal I Storm Surge. ! - Areas of FEMA Velocity Zone not includ(A in Evacuation Level A. Includes the entire parcel wtw. VE Zone is egealw' than w equal Lo 20% d One parcel. L7 Locations a4 Ile Cleawaler Bay Bluffs, Clearwater Planning Area Outside Clearwater City Limits Clearwater.- _n ^ \ t l?????y.ll A7 • • o ?n Cl 'C7 G r G N n r Q ? w G w ? r N c N O .?y N O C 5 c o w a C17 0 x ? w ? 00 .^. o? a? a c? ??4. .w k %k ? Ur Yr c wnr w or Ckrurwatur / ocarwr ? uu.. u.u ,a ,r ,.n , } r.. ?iarbm tf s ?x ;?. '1e? -Y= ,Clearwater x ?a o? C ? VQ ?p • 0 ? o b .?y c rv n b C_ ? rta c? o C tom! F O J ti v W r G vii Cn O ? ti M L.L. x ? ? r 00 City of Cle arwater Comprehensive 11: r, Floodplains Map A: A-10 G0 t I c'y' anvuu Date: 711 712 0 0 8 Source: FEMA I May 2006 8 t,. ... •• •?? - Le end ' orwFrna a ? F"Hazwdkeas A 1100yr FLOOD NO BASE ELEV. DET. ..... ............... m AE 110Dyr FLOOD- BASE ELEV. DIET. d"? r/, AD 1100yr FLOOD- 1-3' )FLOWING) f UNDEVEL OPFD COASTAL BARRIERS VEICOASTAL FLOOD AREA y ' X500155 YR FLOOD AREA i AREAOUTSIDE 500YR FLOOD Clearwater Planning Area '. . ; u ........ .....:_ ,. ....,.7.Cf..........ri^.??. ...... wv. 3 ... f; Outside Clearwater City Limits ' , 1% Z ip 0 y, r Q ? -. ? yr rn d 1 _; ? p yv x a rn<nrcv . ws sr ^ m : . I moo eu d F ! ? y ' ?. a s r r irjvrx• S . J . S u Clearwater i -LEAR Xlcr? ,. Cr1 a • ?o -Ti ry o b 0 ? c .D G b G. 2 a ? Uq L C N N .t (N-. G O ? N_ O 7. nr G Oc.T ^I -n X o x ? HLM RESIDENTIALLOWN£DIUM IUA -RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM PI ? -RESIDENTIAL HIGH N%'X- RESIDENTIAUOFFICE LIMITED KOG. RESICENUAUOFFICE GENERA. R-W RESIDENTWf0FFMMTA0. WH. RESORT FACILITIES HIGH Cm '.Idd CI-COMMERCW NEIGMORF1000 U COMME.RGM. LIMITED ESL t; -COMMLRCALGLNUtnL CRO-CENTRN.60SINf 'a?IIIS It;C L INDUSTRIAL LMMTED W. INDUSTRIAL GENERAL P-PRESERVATIUN ® ROS- RECREATIONROPFN SPACE INS - INSTITUTWNAL [. I.V - TRANSPORTATUMTLiTY 3aeaw Demgmlbm CRO{,ORMINITV REDEVROPMENT DISTRICT - I w.U. Plenlwg Counal Nbb, Feat- O-t y (;AlBIWdIB1 Planning Area Uabi Cleatwffi0r City I -ts 74 6,Clearwater_ ?: k Q r? L17 • s w ? 00 9 0 Agenda Item #3.H.28 02/09/09 Tampa BaYRegronaf Planning Council LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED EAR-BASED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#08-IER For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 1 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 Report prepared January 26, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • Clearwater's Staff Responses to DCA's Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report, and Additional Changes Not Previously Reviewed A. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT: 1. LACK OF PLANNING TIMEFRAME: Response: As per discussion with DCA staff, Map A-3 changed to reflect the planning timeframe of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan of 2018. Population projections as well as the Future Land Use Element Introduction and Needs Summary were also revised to reflect the planning timeframe. 2. DENSITY BONUSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES Response: Revised Policy A.2.2.7 in consultation with DCA personnel for greater specificity as follows: A.2.2.7 The City will provide density bonuses for affordable housing developments that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the total units are reserved as affordable housin units. Such bonuses shall not exceed 50% of the density permitted by the Future Land Use Map and shall not include properties located in the Coastal Storm Area. The density bonus shall be established by ordinance in the Community Development Code. The City will pfevide density bonuses to established in the City's Leeal Housing Assiss-im; -and iWlefnented through the Q" Cow.munity Development Code, Response: Since density bonuses are covered by A.2.2.7., the following was revised in consultation with DCA personnel to support Objective C.1.10. C.1.10.1: Encourage affordable housing projects that are Constructed consistent with US Green Building Council's (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) principles or the Florida Green Building Coalition's (FGBC) Green Land Development and Building Standards. 3. OBJECTIVE A.4.1 AND POLICY A.4.1.1- REGARDING LOS FOR "TRAFFIC CIRCULATION" - REPLACE "TRAFFIC CIRULATION" WITH "ROADS". B. COASTAL EMEMENT 4. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA MAP E-1: THE COLORS USED IN THE LEGEND FOR THE EVACUATION AREAS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED FOR CLARITY. 5. PUBLIC EXPENDITURES WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA: Response: In consultation with DCA personnel, it was determined that Policy E.3.1.3 requires no changes as long as E.3.1.4 is revised as follows and that E 3.1.5 is added: E.3.1.4 Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 3 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • support of the proposed densities permitted by the City's adopted e€ the Future Land Use Element. Plan Map. E.3.1.5 The City's public expenditures in the CHHA, when available, will include program improvements that will restore and enhance natural resources. 6. OBJECTIVE E.1.2 AND POLICY 1.2.1 WERE CHANGED TO IDENTIFY THE CORRECT MAP NUMBER ON THE COASTAL STORM AREA MAP. POLICY E.3.1.4 SETS THE DATE OF 2012 BY WHICH THE POST DISASTER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOULD BE PREPARED. C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT: 7. LACK OF POTABLE WATER SUPPLY CONCURRENCY Response: Policy 1.1.3.2 is revised as per the ORC: 1.1.3.2 The City shall determine, prior to the issuance of development orders, whether sufficient capacity of essential public facilities to meet the minimum standards for levels of service for the existing population and a proposed development will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The applicable water supplier shall be consulted prior to the issuance of a building permit to ensure potable water will be available prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 8. LACK OF A 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Response: Due to overlapping time frames for submission of the EAR-based amendments and the annual Capital Improvements Element update, the City's six-year CIP schedule as adopted by the City Council on November 18, 2008, was submitted to DCA as a separate package on November 26, 2008. The schedule lists the projects by year and cites sources of funding, as well as references the applicable Comprehensive Plan GOP's. It is the opinion of Planning Staff that the Capital Improvements Element as submitted on November 26,2008 adequately addresses the concerns stated in Item C. However, as required by DCA personnel, we are submitting with this response a new table for the Data and Analysis section, (Table of Capital Improvements), the Traffic Operations Division's assessment spreadsheet for determining roadway improvements as well as the Revenues and Expenditures tables from the City Budget. 9. LACK OF ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT: Response: Revised Policy 1.1.3.7 to include a table summarizing level of service standards for CIE. 10. LACK OF CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS Response: Policy 1.1.3.3 Subsection 3 is being revised as follows to address FDOT's comment. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 4 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 .0 1.1.3.3 Subsection 3: For roads and mass transit, transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the City approves a building permit that results in traffic generation. The eeneu.--° ,.,:11 D. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: 11. LACK OF PLANNING TIMEFRAME ON MAPS: Response: The maps have been revised to reflect the appropriate planning timeframes. In addition, specific changes were made to some of the maps as indicated_below: Map B-1: As per discussion with DCA staff, title block changed to more prominently reflect that these are Existing Levels of Service on major roads within the City, including those under State and County jurisdiction. Map B-2, B-3, and B-4: Added planning timeframe of 2018 to map title block. Map B-5: As per discussion with DCA staff, title block changed to more prominently reflect that these are Existing Functional Classifications. Map B-6 through Map B-12: Added planning timeframe of 2018 to map title block. 12. OBJECTIVE B.1.5 REGARDING REFERENCE TO THE STATE ROADWAYS AND POLICY B.1.5.5 REGARDING THE D LOS FOR US 19. Response: Objective B.1.5 has been revised as per DCA and FDOT comments: B.1.5 Objective - All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. Response: Policy B.1.5.5 has been revised as per DCA and FDOT comments: B.1.5.5 The City shall continue to participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to ensure that the level of service standard for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facili is will be consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. E. HOUSING ELEMENT 13. DENSITY INCREASES/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS: Response: For consistency with Policy A.2.2.7, Policy C.1.9.1 has been changed as follows: For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 5 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • C.1.9.1 The Ci , will provide density bonuses for affordable housing developments that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the total units are reserved as affordable housing units. Such bonuses shall not exceed 50% of the density permitted by the Future Land Use Map and shall not include properties located in the Coastal Storm Area. The density bonus shall be established by ordinance in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.1.8 has been changed in consultation with DCA personnel as follows: C.1.1.8 The City mMpermit Gonside one accessory dwelling units ep r lot wherever they such units can be accommodated by adequate lot area, and provided that they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Delete Policy C.1.9.4 as unnecessary due to revised Policy C.1.9.1 Delete Policies C.1.9.5 and A.6.1.12 as unnecessary due to revised Policy C.1.1.8 THE CITY OF CLEARWATER PROPOSES TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS TO THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES. THESE CHANGES ARE BASED ON COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENCIES, AS INDICATED. SOURCE: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL Add the following new policy to the Future Land Use Element: A.2.2.8 All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards contained in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules, including criteria and standards for nomenclature, continuum of plan classifications and categories, use and locational characteristics, map delineation, other standards, and special rules. SOURCE: LETTER FROM COUNTY 10/10/08. Make the following change to the Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.1.8: I.1.1.8 The City shall, in cooperation with Pinellas County as approved by the voters in March 19971 and extended in March 2007, maintain a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax (LGIS) for the purpose of supplementing current revenue sources in order to fund the capital improvements called for in this Plan. SOURCE: LETTER FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 9/11/08. Make the following change to new Policy H.1.1.11 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: H.1.1.11The City shall establish specific policies to provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas County, Pinellas County School Board, other cities, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/15/08. Make following changes to the Future Land Use Element: A. 4.1.2 Fef the read links enufner-ated in the Tfaaspef4atiafi Element, a tiefed level of sef-,xiee is established. The initial level ef sefviee fef the pufpese of issuing develepment peffe"its shall be For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 6 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 A.4.1.2 .4z-3 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a), Florida Statutes. SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/15/08. Add the following from the FDOT Adopted Work Program to the Transportation Element Objective B.2.3: • US Highway 19 From: N of Whitney Rd. To S of Seville Blvd. State Summary: Reconstruct US 19 w/Frontage Rd., Belleair Interchange • US Highway 19 From: S of Seville Blvd. To N of SR 60 State Summary: Reconstruct US 19 w/Frontage Rd., Seville Interchange SOURCE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/15/08. Policy 1.1.3.5.3 (c) iii of the Capital Improvements Element is amended as follows: iii. amend this Comprehensive Plan to modify the adopted standard for the level of service so as to reduce the required facility to equal the applicant's needs, excludin Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), Federal Intrastate Hiehwav Svstem (FIRS). Transportation Reeional Impact Proiect (TRIP) funded state roads. SOURCE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT. In order to provide for consistency with amended policy D.1.1.1., the second, third and fourth bullets of the Utilities Needs Summary for Sanitary Sewer are amended as follows: • The minimum level of service standard is an average of 127 gallons per person per day (GPCD). The Nila+shall 9 tFeet tf eatf neat f aeil4y pfevid-e-r-, seaPkieea At -a Fake of A-4; ea hiindr-ed and twenty fOUF (12 4) For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 7 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 8 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • AMENDMENT #08-ER EAR-based Amendments Future Land Use Element • Objective A.1.2• Population densities (inel ded in the Coastal Management Element and the Futu. r and r se Ma ) in the coastal storm areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property except for specific areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, in which case densities identified in Beach by Design govern. All densities in the coastal storm area ftad shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Emergency Management uuffieaae hvae alien Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study Nam an shall be f "taiiie 1 of de fease•7 Policy A.1.2.1: The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodation uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. Policy A.1.2.2: Continue to cooperate with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and Pinellas County to meet the regional objectives for evacuation of permanent populations as well as other emergency concerns. A.2.2.7: The City will provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Local Housing Assistance Plan and implemented through the City's Community Development Code. GOAL A.S: The Citv of Clearwater shall identifv and utilize a Citvwide design structure comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The Citywide design structure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the City uniquely Clearwater. Objective A.5.1: Establish the Hierarchy of Place Objective A.5.2: Define linkages Obiective A.5.3: Use the city-wide design structure as a guide to preserve the existing character of certain corridors within the City of Clearwater. Objective A.5.4: Use the Citywide design structure as a guide to support redevelopment of properties along important corridors. Obiective A.5.5: Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. Objective A.5.6: Use Public Art ad Design Program to contribute to Clearwater's visual identity, create memorable images of the city for visitors and residents, reinforce Clearwater's role as an emerging regional leader in culture, recreation and environmental management and the City's reputation as a wonderful place to live, earn, work and play. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 9 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 GOAL A.6: The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources, ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and encourage infill development. Policy A.6.1.2: Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Objective A.6.3: The City shall encourage the implementation of historic overlay districts, the maintenance of existing historic properties, and the preservation of existing neighborhoods through the use of design guidelines and the implementation of the City's Community Development Code. Objective A.6.5: The City shall encourage improved land use compatibility through the evaluation of traffic calming techniques, multi-modal transportation networks, and the use of transit oriented development planning. Policy A.6.9.3: Develop incentives for LEED-certified and FGBC-certified buildings. Transportation Element Policy B.1AA The City shall explore transportation concurrency alternatives, such as Multi- modal Transportation Districts (MMTDs), for downtown, Clearwater Beach and/or other potential redevelopment areas or activity centers to incorporate community design features that reduce vehicular usage while supporting an integrated multi-modal transportation system. Policy B.1.4.6: When a development results in traffic generation volumes causing a degradation of service below D in the pm peak hour, the City shall require transportation facilities to be in place or under actual construction within 3-years after issuance of a building permit in accordance with the City's Proportionate Fair Share Pro ram. Objective B.1.7: The natural, recreational, scenic, historic, and cultural resources of the Courtney Campbell Causeway shall be preserved and enhanced for the City of Clearwater residents. Policy B.3.2.2: Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts, where applicable, for future high=speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 10 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 • Housinjj Element • Policy C.1.1.7: The City shall further the coal of providing a variety of housing choices by encouraging land assembly where possible, through such things as density bonuses, height increases, and setback reductions. Policy C.1.1.8: Consider accessory dwelling units wherever they can be accommodated by adequate lot area and provided they meet strict compliance standards such as building restrictions, visual buffering, parking and other requirements to be developed for inclusion in the Community Development Code. Policy C.1.2.6: The City shall identify vacant and under-utilized city-owned property that may be deemed surplus property and make it available for the development of affordable housing. Policy C.1.2.7: The City shall work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation and local government bodes to protect dedicated affordable housing revenues as provided by the Economic Development and Housing Department's 2005 - 2010 Consolidated Planning Document, the Sadowski Act, and Federal, State and Local Government Housing Trust Funds. Objective C.1.9: The City of Clearwater shall be proactive in incentivizing the construction of affordable housing. Objective C.1.10: Recognizing that sustainable building techniques contribute to keep housing units affordable over the long erm by reducing energy consumption, lowering utility bills and decreasing maintenance costs, the City of Clearwater will promote the use of green housing construction, renovation, and rehabilitation. Objective C.1.11: Cooperate with Pinellas County, other municipalities and other organizations to see an end to homelessness. Utilities Element Stormwater Minor changes only. Solid Waste Minor changes only. Stormwater Minor changes only. Potable Water & Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Policy D.5.5.8: When new subdivisions are being developed and/or redevelopment occurs at the locations where reclaimed water will be available within seven (7) years, the developer shall provide internal reclaimed water systems that are constructed to City specifications. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 11 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 0 0 Coastal Manallement Policy E.1.6.2: The City will encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts and marinas and other water-dependent facilities. Policy E.1.6.3: The City discourages the rezoning of recreational and commercial working waterfronts. Policy E.1.6.4: The City will support -accessory transient marina docks and slips through the Community Development Code and special area plans. Policy E.31.3: Limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high-hazard areas except for restoration or enhancement of natural resources. E.3.1.4 AND E.3.1.5 Changed per ORC Report: E.3.1.4 Ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities permitted by the City's adopted e€ -he Future Land Use Element. Plan Map. E.3.1.5 The City's public expenditures in the CHHA, when available, will include program improvements that will restore and enhance natural resources. GOAL EA: The City shall accomplish post-disaster redevelopment in a manner that shall minimize public and private vulnerability to future disasters. GOAL E.5: The preservation of economic activity within the Coastal Storm Area is a priority for the City. Conservation Element Policy F.1.2.3: The City shall support the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for impaired water and its implementation as appropriate within the Cites Policy F.1.2.10: Monitor and enforce City requirements for treatment ponds and environmental mitigation sites. Policy F.1.7.5: Provide education programs to encourage preservation of the natural environment and promote the use of "Florida friendly" and drought tolerant vegetation and ground cover in an effort to conserve water. Policy F.2.1.10: The Citv will encourage the use of "Low Impact Development" techniques for stormwater management, such as minimal land disturbance, the preservation of native vegetation, and the minimization of impervious cover, through site plan and internal processes. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 12 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 s 6 Recreation and Open Space Minor changes only. Intergovernmental Coordination Policy H.1.1.7: The City shall strengthen coordination with other municipalities, the MPO, Pinellas County and FDOT to establish, measure, and maintain the level of service standards for roadways in the Strategic Intermodal System (U.S. 19) and other State and Country Roads. Policy H.1.1.10: The City shall strengthen the level of coordination with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Tampa Ba?Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), Pinellas County, and other municipalities to promote the concept of livable neighborhoods. Policy 11.1.1.11: The City shall establish specific policies to provide for enhanced hurricane and disaster management coordination between the City, Pinellas County, other cities, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the State of Florida with particular emphasis on public outreach and education. Capital Improvements Element Minor changes only. Public School Facilities No changes. • Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that by their breadth and scope, the EAR-based amendments will directly or indirectly be related to or impact regionally significant resources and facilities. • Result in extra jurisdictional impacts?: No. • Effects of the amendment on the following issues: • Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: The EAR-based amendments appear to be compatible with local plans. • Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Potable water within the City of Clearwater is provided by 23 City-operated fresh water wells (19 active and 4 inactive) and seven interconnects with the Pinellas County water system. Pinellas County water is purchased by the City of Clearwater through an intergovernmental agreement as a means to augment the City's groundwater sources and to meet the City's water demands. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 13 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: The City has adopted a number of policies that address how the City will encourage the building of more affordable housing. Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to, protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: The City's EAR-based amendments include policies that support the protection of natural resources of regional significance located within the City's Planning Area including LULC wet and dry, pine flatwoods, and FNAI Coastal and Wetland Communities. Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities including, but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: The City has many new policies that address transportation issues. The EAR-based amendments identify improvements that will increase capacity on McMullen Booth Road. Policies also address consistency with FDOT's minimum levels of service for roadway facilities, transit service, high speed rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, concurrency management, and Multi-modal transportation systems. In addition, multi-modal transportation improvements are being planned to help alleviate congestion and parking issues on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. The City will also consider Multi-modal Transportation Districts for downtown and the beach. • Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: The City has adopted the required policies addressing the CHHA/Coastal Storm Area and evacuation clearance times. • Regional Comments: None. • Applicable SRPP Policies: The additions and revisions contained in the proposed amendment were found to be supportive of and further the goals and policies of the SRPP's five subject areas. • Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of February 9, 2009 14 Staff Contact: Report prepared January 26, 2009 Jessica Lunsford, Ext. 38 ?t o 'v 0 o C CD O 10 : , 0 a? dQ y 0 "17 rn N y N O CD Us r• ty C 0 w a M CA 0 • w w? RWWW "V Coastal Storm Area (Including Coastal High, c M^^ Hazard Area) _ cr M MaP#: E1 , ?. Date: 711712008 ? rr ?. 4 _. - ..... T mpa BW Rapt W % ning los it This map is reprosenWilonal only. For r ,,-' wrrn;n!e iMcmauon refer to Pinoans c.v Crnmty Plamiing. . .: L'gelid ;......: r P . 7 ? N "W Flood Zone VE (FEMA N-'lauly tonu) Evacuation Level A • ,,,, J (Coastal High Harald Area- CHHA( Porels villain Cal I Sion Surge u % greater than or equal to 20% ofN 3 + parcel, or those portions of an Is and t e not inundated h the Cal1 Stonr Surge. ? a .......::. .. .. : : - u Z. .-._ _. .. _. _ ....... .. e . ... . .. .. . '? • _..ti f . ; Areas nl ,-EPM Vcoaly Zono rat (nGude^ a ?' ' S in Evacuaii n Level A. Includes the entire parcel wham VP. Zone is greater than or t l 20% f the paren . equa to o _..7 locations atop the Clearwater Bay Bluffs ruv ; ,; Clearwater Planning Area ,,._ - •i Outside Cinarwater City I. imits :?X• v ., .- „ ., e? ? ? m ?, .i u, vr. ,yam J ,.? 7 y ° Clearwater T ? ` S n r ? •. ..... n o ....... ... ......... ( ar N T.a. bwnw y 1 x? x? A r'! 0 ? o 10 " 0 o C N fC? CD C. a. CD ? c o 'r1 rn N O N O CD A A? C a. tr1 0 x R w? 00 .^. _ w • s a e I; Q 9 ? ??t' ?y _.^.. ............ Hurricane Storm Surge Areas t. a - ., ,.. ?. ..__ ... n p.}eX;o? . Cate WM2008 ... . Tipp Qay R.01.11.) ? Planning c, u. rlllM yT008 ...... t?. - Le end -` c Storm Surge Areas Storm Category 3 r. _ ,.,t Clearwater Planning Area Q+ ^ Outside Clearwater City Limits "! ?s # r e. ,. 4 0 4 i __ i hnw??M i t_cleanvater. r 3 r ., . 5? aY1 ' .. a rv m - worw s-n aww C A? l 1 fD ? r"1 ?Q r* fD ?s eo • • ? o b ? o c b c CD CD ?. a? J. C (JQ cot M `G rn N O O N O J .~ CD n 611 C W Cn a M Cn 0 x 00 00 :-: AL " I Fioodplains .. ?' ..'. IMaptl: Ado Date: 7117/2000 .. .: :., Soarco: FENIA I May 2006 .... k ? ? Legend Flood Flazald Areas i Zone A / 100yf FLOOD- NO OASE ELEV. DET. -'? - AE / 100yr FLOOD BASE EILEV DET AO 1100yr FLOOD. 1.T (FLONING) UNDEVELOPED GOAMAL BARRIERS VE I COASTAL FLOOD AREA Y. X5001500 YR FLOOD AREA ARFAOUTSiDE 500YRFLOOD Clearwater Planning Area Outside Clearwater City Limits a m I o( i I Clearwater, o I :.: .. - u b ti CD 0 ? 0 C CD C) 'O CD c? j. c °° 0 M `rl , N y N 00 r.-I N n G ? (7 M y.,d M l+l Q x w 00 .^. Future Lalul Us• ?. t f l ?i t l aI.R4MAR ? ^ t; - UUNEbN ' . Sd_M'ilh* 11. 3 1 s,r .IYb<bR?r ?Y ..w .. b < - ? y E ftftft J FIEUF0.IH r#f$• : l,- a??l ... ? is ?... ? "?"?i?:,? .. n? ?, ? 3 bab NTS ,: J j < . .. Map M: A-3 Date: 711012008 Source: Pinellas planning Council I Jun 2007 . L.. nd.... ... .. Funlre Lard Use Calegaiea R.MUnW3 4 u.d U. 0 RE-RESIDENTMa ESTATE R.. - RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN RL- RESIDENTIAL LOW RU- RESOENTIN. URBAN RIM - RESIDENTIAL LOW MEDIUM t RM - RE-,IDF.NTW, MEDIUM RI' -RESIVNTIAL 11611 PJOL. RFSIDFNTAIx)r ICF1IMfTF.D R OG, RESIDENTIALOFFICE GENERAL fL'(MR-7ESID£NTIAL'G'Ff ICE?RETAII I R(H- ILIGRI FAGI.11lE$ H-GH aY Ya,d CN-COMMCRCIAI NEIGAiBORH00D CL- COMMERCIAL LIMITED CG-COMMERCIAL GENERAL CBD- CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT •d SInN IL-INDUSI R.AL LIMITEO , .: IG-INGUSTR:AI GENERAL I P-PRESERVATION V. RIO,9-RFC,9EATI0WGPEN SPACE 03 INS-INSTIfURDNAL I TN TRAWSPOITIATKMMII11.11Y K Tel (ksignatlal6 C3 CRDCOMMUVITY REDEVE JPHENT DISIRIC -' ia elas Planning CouerciI Water Fcalera OwNay O Wde(w3 YAntrr City Liils leam,ater .? ? IT N w ?'1 M >y ? a. ? r ?s 0 9 0 L Council Agenda ............ _------__--== www.tbrpc.orc Tampa E3ay Renal Planning Council 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100, Pinellas Park, FL 33782 February 9, 2009 Phone: 727-570-5151 / Suncom 513-5066 / Fax 727-570-5118 10:00 a.m. "THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC" Please Turn Off All Electronic Devices During the Meeting Call to Order Invocation and Pledge Roll Call Voting Conflict Report Chair Dodson Ms. Jill Collins Recording Secretary Recording Secretary PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO MICROPHONE FOR RECORDING PURPOSES Approval to accept Federally Funded Homeland Security Grant Program to funded a planner for 18-months, to perform duties specified by the Tampa Bay Regional Domestic Security Task Force, Region 4. The grant is from the Department of Homeland Security, through the Florida Division of Emergency Management/Department of Community Affairs in the amount of $75,000. The Department of Homeland Security has authorized two planner positions for each of the 7 Domestic Security Regions. One resides with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the second positions is authorized to a regional county office, either with a county emergency management office or reallocated to a respective Florida Regional Planning Council. TBRPC will administer the Region IV RDSTF planner at TBRPC offices for the period outlined in the contract and will respond to statement of work developed by the state, appended to the contract. There is no requirement for in-kind match. Action Recommended: Motion to authorize the Chair to sign the agreement with DCA. 1. Approval of Minutes - Secretary/Treasurer Collins Approve the minutes from the December 8, 2008 Annual Meeting (report attached) Staff contact: Lori Denman, ext. 17 2. Budget Committee - Secretary/Treasurer Collins A. Approve the Financial Report for the period ending 11/30/08 (report attached) B. Approve the Financial Report for the period ending 12/31/08 (report attached) Staff contact: John Jacobsen, ext. 19 3. Consent Agenda - Chair Dodson A. Budget and Contractual 1. Federally Funded Homeland Security Grant Program Staff contact: Erika Wiker, ext. 21 The County Emergency Management agencies of Hernando, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas and Sarasota have requested that TBRPC staff provide assistance in the production and coordination of printing and distribution of the annual hurricane guide. Bids were received from three (3) print companies based on the specifications provided. Newspaper Printing Company, Tampa, FL, a local firm and the printer selected in 2007 and 2008 was selected based on past performance and references, demonstrated capabilities and cost. Print placement and management services will be provided by Printing Solutions of Florida. Action Recommended: Authorize the Executive Director to sign a Purchase Order for up to $45,000 with the Printing Solutions of Florida for printing and print management services of the 2009 Hurricane Guide. Staff contact: Betti Johnson, ext. 39 B. Intergovernmental Coordination & Review (IC&R) Program 1. IC&R Reviews by Jurisdiction a. December 2008 (report attached) b. January 2009 (report attached) 2. IC&R Database a. December 2008 (report attached) b. January 2009 (report attached) Action Recommended: None. Information Only. Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 C. DRI Development Order Reports (DOR) Due to statutory and contractual requirements, the following report has been transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) and all relevant review agencies in accordance with Rule 29H-1.003(3), F.A.C. DRI # 258 - Epperson Ranch, Pasco County (report attached) Action Recommended: For Information Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 D. DRI Development Order Amendment Reports (DOAR) Due to statutory and contractual requirements, the following reports have been transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) and all relevant review agencies in accordance with Rule 29H-1.003(3), F.A.C. 1. DRI # 141 - Westshore Areawide, City of Tampa (report attached) 2. DRI # 247 - Long Lake Ranch, Pasco County (report attached) Action Recommended: For Information Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 The following Reports are presented for Council action: 3. DRI # 130 - Cypress Banks, Manatee County (report attached) 4. DRI # 132 - Gateway Centre/Parcel C-2 Expansion, City of Pinellas Park (report attached Action Recommended: Approve staff reports. Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 E. Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) Reports DRI # 140 - Tampa Triangle, Hillsborough County (report attached) Action Recommended: Approve staff report Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 F. Annual Report Summaries (ARS)Biennial Report Summaries (BRS) 1. DRI # 92 - Park Place, RY 2007-08, City of Clearwater (report attached) 2. DRI # 115 - Woodland Corporate Center, RY 2007-08, Hillsborough County (report attached) 3. DRI # 116 - Tampa Telecom Park, RY 2007-08, City of Temple Terrace (repo) attached rt 4. DRI # 118 - Tampa Cruise Ship Terminal, RY 2007-08, City of Tampa (repo attached 5. DRI # 233 - Connerton, RY 2007-08, Pasco County (report attached) 6. DRI # 256 - Northwest Sector, RYs 2006-08, (Biennial), Manatee County (report attached) Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 G. DRI Status Report Action Recommended: None. Information Only. Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 H. Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments (LGCP) Due to statutory and contractual requirements, the following reports have been transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) and the appropriate local government in accordance with Rule 29H-1.003(3), F.A.C. 1. DCA # 09-1AR, Pinellas County (report attached) 2. DCA # 08-1, City of Zephyrhills (report attached) 3. DCA # 06D-1, Pasco County (adopted) (report attached) 4. DCA # 08-2AR, Pinellas County (adopted) (report attached) 5. DCA # 08-CIE, City of Tarpon Springs (WITHDRAWN) 6. DCA # 08-CIE, City of Oldsmar (report attached) 7. DCA # 09-1, Town of Redington Beach (report attached) 8. DCA # 08-2, Hillsborough County (adopted) (report attached) 9. DCA # 08-2, City of Plant City (adopted) (report attached) 10. DCA # 08-CIE, City of Pinellas Park (report attached) 11. DCA # 08-CIE, City of Plant City (report attached) L? -12. DCA # 09-CIE, City of Clearwater (report attached) e 13. DCA # 09-1, City of Madeira Beach (report attached) U 14. DCA # 08-2AR, City of Largo (adopted) (report attached) 15. DCA # 08-1PEFE, City of Seminole (adopted) (report attached) 17. DCA # 08-1RWSP, Pasco County (adopted) (.report attached) 23. DCA # 07-1ER, City of Port Richey (adopted) (report attached) 26. DCA # 08,D1, Pasco County (adopted) (report attached) 28. DCA # 08-lER, City of Clearwater (adopted) (report attached) 29. DCA # 08-2ARB, City of St. Petersburg (adopted) (report attached) Action Recommended: For Information Staff contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 The following report(s) are presented for Council action: 16. DCA # 09-1ER, City of Bradenton Beach (report attached) 18. DCA # 09-CIE, Pasco County (report attached) 19. DCA # 09-IER, City of Pinellas Park (report attached) 20. DCA # 09-CIE, Town of Kenneth City (report attached) 21. DCA # 09-1ER, St. Pete Beach (report attached) 22. DCA # 09-CIE, City of Tampa (report attached) 24. DCA # 09-IER, Town of St. Leo (report attached) 25. DCA # 09-CIE, City of St. Pete Beach (report attached) 27. DCA # 08-1ER, Town of Redington Shores (report attached) 30. DCA # 08-ER, Town of Redington Beach (adopted) (report attached) 31. DCA # 08-IER, City of Dunedin (adopted) (report attached) Action Recommended: Approve staff reports Staff contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 4. Item(s) Removed from Consent Agenda and Addendum Item(s) Council members shall notify the Chair of any items they wish to be pulled from the Consent Agenda. These items will be discussed and voted on separately after the remainder of the Consent Agenda is approved. 5. Review Item(s) or Any Other Item(s) for Discussion 6. A. The Florida Strawberry Festival Ms. Barbara Caccamisi, Ms. Lauren Der, Florida Strawberry Festival Queen, and a representative from the Florida Strawberry Festival Committee, will briefly share highlights for this year's event. Following the Council meeting Ms. Caccamisi and her volunteers from St. Clements Catholic Church will create an exact replica of their "Make Your Own Shortcake" booth. Everyone at the Council meeting will have the opportunity to make their own shortcake. The Florida Strawberry Festival will run from February 26' through March 8`h and has been an annual event since 1930. Staff contact: Wren Krahl, ext. 22 B. Model Regional Fertilizer Ordinance - Ms. Holly Greening, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Estuary Program (TBEP) The Tampa Bay Estuary Program approved an ordinance for use by local governments within the Tampa Bay watershed which could result in reduced nitrogen loading to Tampa Bay and improved water quality. Ms. Greening will explain the ordinance and its implications. Additional Materials: 1. Model Regional Fertilizer Ordinance (report attached) 2. Resolution #2009-1 (report attached) Action Recommended: Motion for Adoption of the Model Fertilizer Ordinance by Local Governments of the Tampa Bay Region, Resolution #2009-1. Staff contact: Suzanne Cooper, ext. 32 C. Friendship Trail Hillsborough County engineering staff will provide a status of the structural issues with the TrailBridge. Pinellas County staff serves as support to the oversight committee and will be available to answer any questions related to the committee. Staff contact: Wren Krahl, ext. 22 7. Program Reports A. Agency On Bay Management (ABM) - Chair, Mr. Bob Kersteen The Agency's Habitat Restoration Committee met on December 11', the full Agency met on January 8', and the Agency's Natural Resources/Environmental Impact Review Committee and the Legislative Review committees will meet on February 12'. A preview of the February 12' meetings will be provided. Additional Material: Summaries of the December 11" and January 8'h meetings will be distributed. Staff contact: Suzanne Cooper, ext. 32 0 0 B. Clearinghouse Review Committee (CRC) - No Report Staff contact: Avera Wynne, ext. 30 C. Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) - No Report The Tampa Bay LEPC last met on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 and will next meet on February 25, 2009. Please recall that the LEPC meetings are now conducted quarterly. On December 4, 2008, the LEPC sponsored a class for Pasco County firefighters in Air Monitoring under the 2008-09 Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Program. Staff is in the process of coordinating and/or sponsoring additional multi-day training opportunities consisting of a chlorine class (for Manatee County firefighters) and a "Hazmat IQ" class which would/could be beneficial to many emergency response disciplines. Council staff made a presentation to the Tampa Bay Spill Committee on December 9, 2008 and conducted Emergency Preparedness and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) "How to Comply" workshops at the Tampa Port Authority on January 20-23, 2009. Additional EPCRA workshops are being planned for the Council offices in early February. Staff attended the Winter quarter SERC meetings in Tallahassee on January 8-9, 2009. A recap of the SERC meetings is provided. Additional Material: SERC/LEPC Staff & Chairs Meetings, January 8-9, 2009 (report attached Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 29 D. Emergency Management - No Report Staff contact: Betti Johnson, ext. 39 E. Legislative Committee - Chair, Mr. Julian Garcia, Jr. The Legislative Committee Chair will provide a report. Staff contact: Wren Krahl, ext. 22 F. Regional Planning Advisory Committee (RPAC) - No Report Staff contact: Avera Wynne, ext. 30 G. Economic Development - No Report Staff contact: Patrick O'Neil H. Regional Domestic Security Task Force (RDSTF) - No Report Staff contact: Erika Wiker, ext. 21 9. Other Council Reports 10. Executive/Budget Committee Report - Chair Dodson 11. Chair's Report 12. Executive Director's Report Adjournment Next meeting: Monday, March 9, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The Council, in accordance with its adopted rules of procedure, may only take action on matters not on the printed agenda involving the exercise of agency discretion and policymaking upon a finding by the Council of an emergency situation affecting the public's health, safety, and welfare. Council meetings are Public Meetings within the context of Section 286.011, Florida Statutes. The Chair has full discretion as to whether or not to recognize speakers other than Council members or staff, and is not required to recognize individuals to speak on issues before the Council. Public Hearings on issues before the Council are conducted by individual local governments, and are the proper forum for public comment. Please note that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at the above cited meeting or hearing, s/he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, s/he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Persons wishing to speak at a Council meeting are required to complete the form provided at the entrance to the meeting room. The form, after being completed, must be given to the Recording Secretary. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this meeting you are entitled, at no cost to you, the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at 727-570-5151 ext. 14 within 3 working days prior to the meeting. • CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The City of Clearwater proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 7993-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AND THE FUTURE LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING, UTILITIES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT, CONSERVATION, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENTS; MAKING SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AS RECOMMENDED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT; MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed ordinance will affect the land area shown on the map in this advertisement: (INSERT MAP HERE) Public hearings on the proposed ordinance will be held as follows: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 - Community Development Board 1:00 p.m. Thursday, December 18, 2008 - City Council (2nd Reading) 6:00 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) The public hearings will be heard in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Department City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING. SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater granicus.comNiewPubiisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library Ad: 12/04/08 t . • 92, 007-06003 • Board ofV`',ounty Commissioners learwater Neighborhoods Coalition 315 Court St Shelly Kuroghlian, President 5th Floor 1821 Springwood Circle S. Clearwater, FL 337 Clearwater, FL 33763 0 0 WORK SESSION AGENDA Council Chambers - City Hall 12/15/2008 1:00 PM 1. Presentations 1.1 Service Awards 0 Attachments 2. Economic Development and Housing 2.1 Accept the Local Housing Incentive Strategy (Report) developed by the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee and direct staff take the necessary steps to incorporate the appropriate strategies into the Local Housing Assistance Plan S Attachments 2.2 Approve the City of Clearwater FY 2007-2008 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). ID Attachments 3. Fire Department 3.1 Appoint Mr. Robert Going to a two-year term ending December 31, 2010 as a Trustee of the Clearwater Firefighters' Supplemental Trust Fund in accordance with Sec. 175.061 of the Florida State Statutes. (consent) IB Attachments 4. Gas System 4.1 Approve a Utility Work By Highway Contractor Agreement with Pinellas County to relocate and install natural gas mains during improvement project, PID: 920522 Pinellas County, Keystone Road from US 19 to East Lake Road, at an estimated cost of $434,000 and adopt Resolution 08-27. 15 Attachments 5. Police 5.1 Approve an agreement between The Florida Commission on Community Service and the City of Clearwater renewing the AmeriCorps Clearwater program for the period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, including a cash match in the amount of $84,895 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) IB Attachments 5.2 Approve a donation to Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project, Inc. (CHIP) for funding 2008/2009 Day Center operations and authorize the allocation of $119,470.00 of General Fund Unappropriated Retained Earnings to fund this program. (consent) 10 Attachments 6. Engineering 6.1 Accept a 385 square foot Drainage and Utilities Easement conveyed by Robert C. and Susan K. Goodell, over, under and across a portion of Lot 18, Fair Oaks Subdivision first Addition, in consideration of t ? • receipt of $1.00 and the bel?llits to be derived therefrom. (consent) 19 Attachments 6.2 Approve a lease amendment between the City of Clearwater and K and P Clearwater Estate, LLC for 100 additional temporary parking spaces on property located at 100 Coronado and authorize appropriate officials to execute same. 1B Attachments 6.3 Approve a Lease Modification Agreement between the City of Clearwater, Silver Dollar Trap Club, Inc. and Silver Dollar Shooters Resort, L. L. C., amending the Lease Agreement dated February 14, 1994 between the City and Silver Dollar Trap Club, Inc. with respect to 18.18 acres, more or less, in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 27 South, Range 17 East, Hillsborough County, Florida; declare same as surplus for the purpose of granting an option to extend said Lease for one additional term of five (5) years, and consent to the Assignment, Assumption and Modification Agreement integral therewith by and between Silver Dollar Trap Club, Inc., Silver Dollar Shooters Resort, L. L. C. and NHC-FL8, L. P., and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. IB Attachments 6.4 Accept a 2,672 square foot Sidewalk and Utilities Easement conveyed by Station Square Clearwater Condo, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, over, under and across a portion of Lot 4 and Lot 11, and the West 2 feet and 4 inches of Lot 12, Gould and Ewing's 1 st and 2nd addition to Clearwater Harbor, Florida, given in consideration of receipt of $1.00 and the benefits to be derived therefrom. (consent) 1B Attachments 7. Planning 7.1 Approve amendment to the Community Development Code to allow a reduced parking requirement for changes of use within the Downtown (D) District where there are no existing parking spaces or available land for their construction, and Pass Ordinance 7999-08 on first reading. 10 Attachments 7.2 Approve amendments, relating to community policing and performing arts theatre, to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and pass Ordinance 8014-09 on first reading. ID Attachments 7.3 Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low (RL) and Initial Zoning Atlas Designation of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 2328 Anna Avenue (Lot 30, Rolling Heights in Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinances 8019-08, 8020-08 and 8021-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-09016) ID Attachments 7.4 Approve amended and restated Development Agreement for property located at 100 Coronado, between K and P Clearwater Estate, LLC (the property owner) and the City of Clearwater (Case No. DVA2008- 00001)and adopt Resolution 08-14. 15 Attachments 8. Legal 8.1 Approve filing third-party actions against design/build engineer Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc. (PBSandJ), for contribution, indemnification and related causes of action for alleged wrongful design and/or construction of the Coronado Drive Improvement portion of the Beach by Design project in the case of Szlechta v. City and Rudman v. City; and approve filing suit against PBSandJ for alleged wrongful design and/or construction of the Coronado Drive Improvement portion of the Beach by Design project to seek contribution and/or indemnification for the costs of settlement incurred in the case of Tracey v. City. (consent) 0 Attachments 8.2 Approve amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and according to comments from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and adopt OrdinanO993-08 on second reading. r, S Attachments 8.3 Authorize instituting a civil action against Crimone Development Corporation to recover $1,817.23 for damage to City property. (consent) Attachments 8.4 Authorize instituting a civil action against Davis Construction Co. of Pinellas County to recover $1,665.62 for damage to City property. (consent) 15 Attachments 8.5 Authorize instituting a civil action against Environmental Crossings, Inc., ro recover $9,696.27 for damage to City property. (consent) 19 Attachments 9. City Manager Verbal Reports 9.1 City Manager Verbal Reports Attachments 10. Other Council Action 10.1 Other Council Action Attachments 11. Adjourn 12. Presentation(s) for Council Meeting 12.1 Home of the Quarter, Business of the Quarter, and Neighborhood of the Quarter 15 Attachments 12.2 Human Rights Week Proclamation - Lawrence Jaffe, Stazja McFadyen, and Shelley Jaffe 1B Attachments 12.3 National Homeless Persons Memorial Day Proclamation - received by Sara Snyder 19 Attachments Revised 11/12/2008 AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 Time: 1:00 p.m. I.d Floor, Place: 112 South Osceola Street,' Clearwater, Florida, 33756 (City Hall Council Chambers) Welcome the City of Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB) meeting. The City strongly supports and frilly complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. An oath will be administered swearing in all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Kindly refrain from conducting private conversations, using beepers, cellular telephones, etc. as they are distracting during the meeting. Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing. a decision of this Board must have a record of the proceedings to support such appeal. Community Development Code Section 4- 206 requires that any person seeking to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witness, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests should request party status during the case discussion. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. If you have questions or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter from the Planning Department listed at the end of each agenda item at 727-562-4567. * Make Us Your Favorite! www.myclearwater.com/.ov/depts/plan:nin? Community Development Board Agenda - October 21, 2008 - Page I of 2 A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL: Chair Fritsch, Vice Chair Coates, Members Adelson, Behar, Dame, Tallman, DiPolito, Alternate Member Cat-lough, City Staff C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: October 21, 2008 D. LEVEL THREE APPLICATION (Item 1): 1. Case: Amendments to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan - Level Three Application Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendments to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan making minor amendments to support a performing arts theater in Downtown and to add policies and strategies supporting community policing innovations, as well as establishing community policing innovations as a program eligible to be supported by tax increment financing. Neighborhood Associations: Country Club Addition; East Gateway; Harbor Oaks; Hillcrest; Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association; Mediterranean; Pierce 100 Condominium Association; Skycrest Neighborhood Association and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Planning Director. E. CHAIR ITEM: (Item 1): 1. A Cents of Place F. ADJOURNMENT S: Wlanning DepartmentlC D BUgendas DRC & CDBICDB12008110 November 18, 20081CDB Agenda November 18, 2008.doc Community Development Board Agenda - October 21, 2008 - Page 2 of 2 City Council Agenda Location: Council Chambers - City Hall Date: 9/4/2008- 6:00 PM Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak, please wait to be recognized, then state your name and address. Persons speaking before the City Council shall be limited to three (3) minutes unless otherwise noted under Public Hearings. For other than Citizens to be heard regarding items not on the Agenda, a spokesperson for a group' may speak for three (3) minutes plus an additional minute for each person in the audience that waives their right to speak, up to a maximum of ten (10) minutes. Prior to the item being presented, please obtain the needed form to designate a spokesperson from the City Clerk (right-hand side of dais). Up to thirty minutes of public comment will be allowed for an agenda item. No person shall speak more than once on the same subject unless granted permission by the City Council. The City' of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 48 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations at 727-562-4090. Assisted Listening Devices are available. Kindly refrain from using beepers, cellular telephones and other distracting devices during the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Presentations 4.1 2008 Legislative Session Report - Sen. Dennis Jones 4.2 Proclamation: Hispanic Heritage Month 4.3 Yellow Ribbon Suicide Awareness and Prevention Month Proclamation 4.4 Project Homeless Connect - Sarah Snyder & Rhonda Abbott, Homeless Leadership Network 4.5 Proclamation: Somebody Cares Tampa Bay 4.6 Proclamation: September is United Way Month 5. Approval of Minutes 5.1 Approve the minutes of the August 21, 2008 City Council Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. 6. Citizens to be Heard re Items Not on the Agenda Public Hearings - Not before 6:00 PM 7. Administrative Public Hearings - Presentation of issues by City staff - Statement of case by applicant or representative (5 min.) - Council questions - Comments in support or opposition (3 min. per speaker or 10 min maximum as spokesperson for others that have waived their time) - Council questions - Final rebuttal by applicant or representative (5 min.) - Council disposition 7.1 Set a final millage rate of. 4.7254 mills for fiscal year 2008/09 levied ag?inst non- exempt real personal property within the City of Clearwater and pass Ordinance 8004-08 on first reading. 7.2 . Approve the City of Clearwater Annual Operating Budget for the 2008/09 fiscal year and pass Ordinance 8005-08 on first reading. 7.3 Adopt the Fiscal Year 2008/09 Capital Improvement Budget and establish a six- year plan for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and pass Ordinance 8006- 08 on first reading. 7.4 Approve the recommended Penny for Pinellas II project list, as revised, for Fiscal Years 2008/09 through 2009/2010. 7.5 Approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and pass Ordinance 7993-08 on first reading. 7.6 Approve amendments to the Community Development Code to permit sandwich board signs in certain areas, provide a fee for such signage, and add a definition for traditional urban corridor, and pass Ordinance 7997-08 on first reading. 8. Quasi-judicial Public Hearings -Staff states and summarizes reasons for recommendation (2 minutes) - Applicant presents case, including its testimony and exhibits. Witness may be cross-examined (15 minutes) - Staff presents further evidence. May be cross-examined (10 minutes) - Public comment (3 minutes per speaker or 10 minutes maximum as spokesperson for others that have waived their time). - Applicant may call witnesses in rebuttal (5 minutes) - Conclusion by applicant (3 minutes) -Decision 8.1 Approve a Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) and Institutional (1) Classifications to the Residential Medium (RM) Classification and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from the Institutional (1) District to the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for property located at 802, 826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed parcel designated as 22/29/15/00000/320/0200 (consisting of a portion of property located in metes and bounds 32/02, 32/03 and 32/07, in Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinances 7945-08 and 7946-08 on first reading. (LUZ2006- 08006) 9. Second Readings - Public Hearing 9.1 Adopt Ordinance No. 7985-08 on second reading, annexing certain real property whose post office address is 1729 Overbrook Avenue into the corporate limits of the city and redefining the boundary lines of the city to include said addition. 9.2 Adopt Ordinance No. 7986-08 on second reading, amending the future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for certain real property whose post office address is 1729 Overbrook Avenue, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential Urban (RU). 9.3 Adopt Ordinance No. 7987-08.on second reading, amending the Zoning Atlas of the city by zoning certain real property whose post office address is 1729 Overbrook Avenue, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Medium Density Residential (MDR). 9.4 Adopt Ordinance No. 7988-08 on second reading, annexing certain real property whose post office address is 1837 Carlton Drive into the corporate limits of the city and redefining the boundary lines of the city to include said addition. 9.5 Adopt Ordinance No. 7989-08 on second reading as amended, amending the future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for certain real property whose post office address is 1837 Carlton Drive, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential Low (RL). 9.6 Adopt Ordinance No. 7990-08 on second reading, amending the Zoning Atlas of the city by zoning certain real property whose post office address is 1837 Carlton Drive, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). 9.7 Continue second reading of ordinance 7997-08, amendment to the Community Development Code to permit sandwich board signs in certain areas, to September 18, 2008. City Manager Reports 10. Consent Agenda 10.1 Approve a lease amendment between the City of Clearwater and Salt Block 57, LLC for 73 additional temporary parking spaces and authorize appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 10.2 Reappoint Carol Warren to the Clearwater Housing Authority with the term expiring on September 30, 2012. (consent) 11. Other items on City Manager Reports 11.1 Amend the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2, Article IV, Division 4 Travel and pass Ordinance 7984-08 on first reading. 11.2 Amend Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Schedule of Fees, Rates and Charges, Section XXV, Public Works Fees, Rates, and Charges (5)(b) Solid Waste collection rates, to increase specific roll-off collection fees for Solid Waste and Recycling and pass Ordinance 7929-08 on first reading. 11.3 Agree to participate in the process provided for in Chapter 171, Part II, Florida Statutes, the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Act; and adopt Resolution 08-24. Miscellaneous Reports and Items 12. City Manager Verbal Reports 13. Council Discussion Items 13.1 Offshore Drilling Resolution 13.2 Island Estates and Penny for Pinellas Document 14. Other Council Action 15. Adjourn LL 0 } Clearwater U ?__ E ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? CONSENT AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 Time: 1:00 p.m. Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3`a Floor, Clearwater, Florida, 33756 (City Hall Council Chambers) Revised 08/21/2008 Welcome the City of Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB) meeting. The City strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. An oath will be administered swearing in all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Kindly refrain from conducting private conversations, using beepers, cellular telephones, etc. as they are distracting during the meeting. Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a record of the proceedings to support such appeal. Community Development Code Section 4- 206 requires that any person seeking to: personally testify, present evidence, argument' and witness, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests should request party status during the case discussion. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. If you have questions or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter from the Planning Department listed at the end of each agenda item at 727-562-4567. * Make Us Your Favorite! www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning Community Development Board Consent Agenda - August 26, 2008 - Page 1 of 3 A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I B. ROLL CALL: Chair Fritsch, Vice Chair Coates, Members Adelson, Behar, Dame, Tallman, DiPolito, Alternate Member Carlough, City Staff C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: July 15, 2008 D. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (to September 16, 2008) (Item 1): 1. Case: FLD2008-02002 -1590 Gulf Boulevard Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Belleview Biltmore Owner, LLC. Representative: Richard Heisenbottle, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A (2199 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 400. Coral Gables, FL 33134; phone: 305-446-7799; fax: 305-446-9275; email: Richard@rjha.net). Location: 1.38 total acres (0.96 acres zoned Commercial District; 0.42 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation and Preservation Districts) located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately 1,100 feet north of the City limits line between Clearwater and Belleair. Atlas Page: 311A. Zoning: Commercial (C) District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 38-unit overnight accommodation use with a 125- seat accessory restaurant in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the-required lot width from 200 to 88.41 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to five feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 20 to zero feet, to allow proposed temporary cabanas up to 25 feet west of the CCCL and an increase to building height from 25 to 67 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; and a reduction to the front (east) perimeter buffer from 15 to five feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) perimeter buffer from 10 to zero feet (to building and pavement) and a reduction to the width of interior landscape islands from eight to 4.6 feet inside curbing, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: 38-unit overnight accommodation use with a 125-seat accessory restaurant. Neighborhood Associations: Sand Key Civic Association; Clearwater Beach Association; and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting (Items 1-4): 1. Case: FLD2006-04026 - 2166 Palmetto Street Owner: Progress Energy. Representative: Boris Hornjak (15500 Lightwave Drive, Suite 100, Clearwater, FL; phone: 727-524- 6000; fax: 727-524-6998). Location: 14.106 acres at the southwest corner of Palmetto Street and Belcher Road. Atlas Page: 271B. Zoning District: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District. Request: Extend the time frame of the Development Order. Proposed Use: Office/Storage/Vehicle Service. Presenter: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager. Community Development Board Consent Agenda - August 26, 2008 - Page 2 of 3 e ? • 2. Case: FLD2008-06016 -1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: ZY LLC. Representative: Joseph Perlman (1101 Belcher Road, Suite B. Largo, FL 33771; phone: 727-536- 2711; fax: 727-536-2714). Location: 0.497 acres located at the northwest corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue. Atlas Page: 289A. Zoning: Commercial (C) District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of an automobile service station in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 to 7.33 feet (to existing building), to four feet (to existing pavement) and to one-foot (to existing covered concrete slab), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 to seven feet (to existing pavement) and to 6.5 feet (to existing dumpster enclosure), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and reductions to the perimeter buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue from 15 to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from five to four feet (to existing pavement) and to one-foot (to existing covered concrete slab), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Automobile service station. Neighborhood Associations: Skycrest; East Gateway; and Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner lIl. 3. Case: TA2008-07003 - Amendments to the Community Development Code Level Three Application Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendments to the Community Development Code to adopt criteria by which sandwich board signs may be permitted in certain areas, provide a fee for such signage, and to add a definition for traditional urban corridor. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager. 4." Case: CPA2007-06003 - Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Level Three Application Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City as adopted on May 18, 2000, and subsequently amended, by amending the Table of Contents and all elements of the comprehensive plan, making substantial changes to the elements based on the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Comprehensive Plan, and making minor editorial changes, in accordance with Florida Statutes. Type of Amendment: Large Scale Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Sandra E. Herman, Planner III F. ADJOURNMENT S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BWgendas DRC & CDBICD&2008M.5 August 26, 200&CDB Consent Agenda August 26 2008.doe Community Development Board Consent Agenda - August 26, 2008 - Page 3 of 3 -#MeetingAgenda 0 0 Page 1 of 6 WORK SESSION AGENDA Council Chambers - City Hall 8/4/2008 - 1:30 PM 1. Presentations 1.1 Fire Recruit Class #11 Graduation/Oath 2 Attachments 2. Financial Services 2.1 Declare the list of vehicles and equipment surplus. to the needs of the City and authorize disposal through sale to the highest bidder at the Tampa Machinery Auction, Tampa, Florida, and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 2 Attachments 2.2 Approve amendments to Code Section 2.527, Settlement of Claims, and pass Ordinance 7964-08 on first reading. 2 Attachments 2.3 Approve amendments to the City's self-insurance program ordinance as codified in Section 2.641- 2.647 and pass Ordinance 7965-08 on first reading. 12 Attachments 2.4 Authorize the Negotiated Sale of not to exceed $12,900,000 City of Clearwater Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2008 to Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) to finance a portion of the project costs incurred to construct the Downtown Boat Slips and Beach Walk and adopt Resolution 08-17. 2 Attachments 3. Information Technology 3.1 Award a contract to Dolphin Communications Services, Inc., St. Petersburg, FL in the amount of $312,798, for the installation of conduit and fiber optic cable in support of emergency operations preparedness at various City facilities and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 12 Attachments 4. Marine and Aviation 4.1 Approve the agreements with Tower Optical for coin-operated viewers at Pier 60 and the Marina and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 15 Attachments 5. Parks and Recreation 5.1 Award a blanket purchase order to Chall Tennis Management, LLC of Clearwater, Florida, in the amount of $250,000, for providing tennis lessons and tennis services at the Henry L. McMullen http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgenda/MeetingAgenda.aspx?meetingid=177 8/4/2008 MeetingAgenda ? Page 2 of.6 Tennis Complex and authorize appropriate officials to execute ste. (consent) S Attachments . 5.2 Adopt revised formulas for the purpose of computing fees for non-residents to participate at City recreation facilities and in City recreation programs and activities; eliminate some of the options in lieu of non-resident card purchase; approve the City Manager or his or her designee to change the surcharge factor; and pass Ordinance 7983-08 on first reading. 2 Attachments 6. Police 6.1 Approve renewing a contract with the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Largo, Florida, for latent fingerprint, crime scene processing, evidence and property storage and Pinellas Juvenile Assessment Center services, during the one year contract period commencing October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009, at a cost of $647,362.00 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) S Attachments 6.2 Authorize the Chief of Police to execute a Multi-Agency Voluntary Cooperation Mutual Aid Agreement with the Office of the Attorney General Child Predator Cyber Crime Unit, adopt Resolution 08-16, and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. 2 Attachments 6.3 Approve submission of a FY 2008 Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (DOJBJA) Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance grant application in the amount of $30,414 to fund the purchase of Tactical Weapons Illuminators and Holsters. (consent) 2 Attachments 6.4 Approve acceptance of a FY 2008 Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (DOJBJA) grant in the amount of $99,730 for a one-year period to fund the Clearwater Area Task Force on Human Trafficking Immersion Training Project. (consent) 2 Attachments 7. Solid Waste/General Support Services 7.1 Approve a Contract (Blanket Purchase Order) for $250,000 to Wingfoot Commercial Tire of Clearwater, FL for the purchase of Goodyear tires for City Motorized equipment per piggyback of Florida State Contract #863-000-06-1 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 2 Attachments 8. Public Services 8.1 Approve the State of Florida Department of Transportation contract renewal for sweeping state roadways as outlined in the Maintenance Agreement, FIN project 42193917201 and adopt Resolution 08-13. 1B Attachments 9. Public Utilities 9.1 Approve the amendment of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to restructure current Water and Sewer Utility funding by increasing project budgets by $4,016,791.00 of planned FY09 revenue bond proceeds and decreasing project budgets by $4,016,791.00 of operating revenues for a net change of zero. (consent) - Attachments http://msb-laser-app/CouncilA?zenda/MeetingAgenda.aspx?meetingid=177 8/4/2008 eMeetingAgenda Page 3 of 6 10. Engineering 10.1 Renew a contract (Purchase Order) to Allied Universal Corporation of Miami, FL from September 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009 for a total value of $142,450 for Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite; approve a 91 day extension and an increase to an existing purchase order to Odyssey Manufacturing Co, Tampa, Florida, increasing the value by $65,683.00 for a total amount of $165,043.00 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 12 Attachments 11. Planning 11.1 Discuss Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan as recommended in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). (WSO) IS Attachments 12. Official Records and Legislative Services 12.1 Appoint a youth member to the Sister Cities Advisory Board with the term expiring on August 31, 2012. IB Attachments 13. Legal 13.1 Adopt Ordinance No. 7958-08 on second reading, annexing certain real property whose post office address is 3147 Downing Street into the corporate limits of the city and redefining the boundary lines of the city to include said addition. 2 Attachments 13.2 Adopt Ordinance No. 7959-08 on second reading, amending the future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for certain real property whose post office address is 3147 Downing Street, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential Urban (RU). EB Attac+mentq 13.3 Adopt Ordinance No. 7960-08 on second reading, amending the Zoning Atlas of the city by zoning certain real property whose post office address is 3147 Downing Street, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). 2 Attachments 13.4 Adopt Ordinance No. 7961-08 on second reading, annexing certain real property whose post office address is 1460 Dexter Drive, together with the right-of-way abutting Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Douglas Manor Lake Subdivision, into the corporate limits of the city and redefining the boundary lines of the city to include said addition. 2 Attachments 13.5 Adopt Ordinance No. 7962-08 on second reading, amending the future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for certain real property whose post office address is 1460 Dexter Drive, together with the right-of-way abutting Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Douglas Manor Lake Subdivision, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential Low (RL). 2 Attachments 13.6 Adopt Ordinance No. 7963-08 on second reading, amending the Zoning Atlas of the city by zoning certain real property whose post office address is 1460 Dexter Drive, together with the right-of-way abutting Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Douglas Manor Lake Subdivision, upon annexation into httn://msb-laser-app/CouncilAizenda/MeetingAgenda.aspx?meetingid=177 8/4/2008 MeetingAgenda 10 Page 4 of 6 the City of Clearwater, as Low Medium Density Residential (L*). 2 Attachments ? 13.7 Adopt Ordinance No. 7968-08 on second reading, annexing certain real property whose post office address is 1762 West Manor Avenue into the corporate limits of the city and redefining the boundary lines of the city to include said addition. IB Attachments 13.8 Adopt Ordinance No. 7969-08 on second reading, amending the future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for certain real property whose post office address is 1762 West Manor Avenue, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential Low (RL). IB Attachments 13.9 Adopt Ordinance No. 7970-08 on second reading, amending the Zoning Atlas of the city by zoning certain real property whose post office address is 1762 West Manor Avenue, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). IB Attachments 13.10 Adopt Ordinance No. 7975-08 on second reading, amending the Zoning Atlas of the city by rezoning certain property whose post office address is 1241, 1261 and 1281 Gulf Boulevard, from Business (B) to Commercial (C). 2 Attachments 13.11 Adopt Ordinance No. 7979-08 on second reading, amending the operating budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 to reflect increases and decreases in revenues and expenditures for the general fund, special development fund, special program fund, water and sewer fund, stormwater utility fund, gas fund, solid waste fund, recycling fund, airpark fund, parking fund, and central insurance fund. 2 Attachments 13.12 Adopt Ordinance No. 7980-08 on second reading, amending the capital improvement budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, to reflect a net increase of $3,914,347. 2 Attachments 13.13 Adopt Ordinance No. 7981-08 on second reading, relating to the neighborhood and affordable housing advisory board; amending code of ordinances, Article 2, Division 9A, Sections 2.226 through 2.229; increasing the number of board members from seven to eleven and providing for qualifications of said members; providing for powers and duties of the board; providing procedures for the board's adoption of final housing incentive strategies recommendations; updating obsolete language; amending code of ordinances Section 2.063 to provide an exception from the city residency requirement for certain members of the neighborhood and affordable housing advisory board. 2 Attachments 13.14 Adopt Ordinance No. 7982-08 on second reading, amending Chapter 2, Article III, Division 2, Code of Ordinances relating to the Airpark Advisory Board; amending Section 2.082 relating to composition of the board; amending Section 2.083, terms of members; amending Section 2.084, powers and duties; and deleting Section 2.085. 2 Attachments 13.15 Adopt Ordinance No. 7991-08 on second reading, submitting to the city electors proposed amendments.to the City Charter amending Section 8.05, Elections; amending Section 8.05(D), deleting current language and providing that the Pinellas County Canvassing Board shall.serve as the City of Clearwater's Canvassing Board unless otherwise provided by ordinance. http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgenda/MeetingAgenda.aspx?meetingid=177 8/4/2008 --MeetingAgenda Page 5 of 6 Attachments 13.16 Adopt Ordinance No. 7992-08 on second reading, amending Section 28.041, Code of Ordinances, to create an exemption to the prohibition against street solicitations in specified conditions. LB-- Attachments 13.17 Continue Public Hearing and 2nd Reading of Ordinances for Land Use and Zoning Amendments for 1551 Gulf Blvd. to October 2, 2008. (LUZ2008-05002) 15 Attachments 13.18 Continue Public Hearing and 2nd Reading of Ordinance for Rezoning of 1180 and 1200 Gulf Blvd. to October 2, 2008. (REZ2008-05003) Attachments 13.19 Continue Public Hearing and 2nd Reading of Ordinance for Rezoning of 1520, 1540, and 1560 Gulf Blvd. to October 2, 2008. (REZ2008-05004) ID Attachments 13.20 Continue Public Hearing and 2nd Reading of Ordinance for Rezoning of 1501 Gulf Blvd. to October 2, 2008. (REZ2008-05005) 2 Attachments 13.21 Set Date for Impasse Hearing C- Attachments 14. City Manager Verbal Reports 14.1 City Manager Verbal Reports 2 Attachments 15. Council Discussion Items 15.1 Clearwater Audubon Society - Banning Dogs on North Clearwater Beach from Shorebird Nesting Areas. 1B Attachments 16. Other Council Action 16.1 Other Council Action IR Attachments 17. Adjourn 18. Presentation(s) for Council Meeting 18.1 2008 Legislative Session Report - Senator Mike Fasano ED Attachments 18.2 Supervisor of Elections Presentation: Election Update 2 Attachments 18.3 Presentation of Check to Pinellas Hope C`5 Attachments 18.4 Diversity Poster Contest Prize 2 Attachments http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgenda/MeetingAgenda.aspx?meetingid=177 8/4/2008 MeetingAgenda 0 Page 6 of 6 18.5 Alternative Transportation - Sandi Moody, Executive Director, Py Area Commuter Services 2 Attachments http://msb-laser-app/CouncilAgenda/MeetingAgenda.aspx?meetingid=177 8/4/2008 • • CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The City of Clearwater proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 7993-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AND THE FUTURE LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING, UTILITIES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT, CONSERVATION, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENTS; MAKING SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AS RECOMMENDED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT; MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed ordinance will affect the land area shown on the map in this advertisement: (INSERT MAP HERE) Public hearings on the proposed ordinance will be held as follows: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - Community Development Board 1:00 p.m. +o A,',)2(0,26o8 Thursday, August 21, 2008-City Council (1st Reading) 6:00 p.m. Resc-t-d,,Ied2,,os (or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) The public hearings will be heard in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Department City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING. SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.phR?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library Ad: 08/07/08 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The City of Clearwater proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 7993-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AND THE FUTURE LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING, UTILITIES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT, CONSERVATION, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, AND PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENTS; MAKING SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AS RECOMMENDED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT; MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed ordinance will affect the land area shown on the map in this advertisement: (INSERT MAP HERE) Public hearings on the proposed ordinance will be held as follows: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - Community Development Board 1:00 p.m. Thursday, August 21, 2008 - City Council (1 st Reading) 6:00 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) The public hearings will be heard in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Department City Clerk City of Clearwater h P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING. SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.phOview id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library Ad: 08/07/08 0 0 City of Clearwater CAC Meeting Notes Clearwater Public Library - May 9, 2007 -1:30 p.m. Members Present: Helen Kerwin, Vonabell Sherman, Ron Delp, Barbara Green, Alex Plisko, Norman Carlough, Elizabeth France. Staff Present: Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, Catherine W. Porter, Long Range Planning Manager, Sandra Herman, Planner III. Other: Glenn Barley, Pinellas County Planning Herman presented a Power Point Presentation: CAC EAR Amendments for the Comprehensive Plan. Planning staff distributed the EAR books. Herman suggested starting with the Executive Summary and said that the Issues of Local Concern is the main role of CAC; statutory issues are cut and dried and staff will address them in the amendments. Delp asked whether they will have training. Herman suggested that members read the Introduction and Executive Summary at the end of each Issue of Local Concern (the blue pages) and the group will discuss questions at future meetings, or call staff and they will answer questions. She said staff will be bringing something for them to react to, and ask for input and additional ideas. Staff will also ask them for direction and to prioritize as well. Clayton explained the Comp Plan elements. The EAR evaluates how the GOPS are working in light of new conditions, etc. These then are used to amend the Comp Plan to reflect changed conditions and priorities. Herman said staff is researching other communities and they will be bringing information to them from this research. Carlough confirmed what the group will be doing is Section 3. She wants the experts to tell them things that are not in the EAR. Clayton said Planning wants the CAC to help use the EAR information to do the GOP's (Goals, Objectives and Policies) for the Comp Plan amendments. She said Planning will bring CAC sections of the Comp Plan with the suggested changes for their input. Staff will be happy to work with each of them one on one or in small groups to bring them up to their comfort level with the information. The CAC will be brainstorming on the list, but not adding to the list. They will be asked to make hard choices on things due to costs, etc. Plisko asked for contact info of members. Meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Meeting Notes by Porter / C l C 0?-1 <,7LY Ci/ t 0 0 CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES ON 2008 EAR-BASED AMENDMENTS Clearwater Public Library Wednesday, June 6, 2007 -1:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Frank Dame, Barbara Green, Judy Melges, Duke Tiernan, Norma Carlough, Elizabeth France, Bill Murray, Helen Kerwin, Gloria Bailey, Ronald Delp, Alex Plisko, Jr. Vonabell Sherman, J.B. Johnson, Laura St. Clair and David Walker of Pinellas County Planning. STAFF PRESENT: Michael Delk, Gina Clayton, Catherine W. Porter, Sandra Herman, Steven Everitt of the Planning Department; Bill Vola, Emergency Management Director, and Bill Morris, Harbormaster. Michael Delk thanked the committee for their time and effort in this process. This effort is one of the most important efforts for planning for the City. We want this to be meaningful, and make this a sustainable community. Clearwater is built out with only about 300 acres of developable land. It is very important how we approach this; to create and maintain while providing affordable housing and things that are important to making a community viable. Delk went over the 5 areas of Local Concern: Comprehensive and Diversified Redevelopment, Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods, Attainable Housing, Annexation and Coastal and Disaster Management. The City Council wants to accommodate workforce housing. It is of prime importance for us to promote character and support our existing quality neighborhoods. We may want to facilitate development. Population estimates for the Tampa Bay area show that about a million people will be added to the region in the next 30 years. It is clearly in Clearwater's long term economic and environmental interest to not encourage sprawl. Clearwater won't be a high growth area, but there are opportunities for utilizing the existing infrastructure to accommodate some of that growth in a way that promotes affordable housing as well as sustaining and promoting our economic base. There are lots of opportunities to help the City maintain and solidify the tax base and maintain the existing level of services to promote community values for work force, economic growth and affordable housing. Clearwater has urban characteristics which make its issues and opportunities unique. Staff's approach to the Comprehensive Plan updates is a work in progress in terms of how we will be coming and what we will be bringing to you. We are starting of with Coastal Management and Hazard Mitigation today because it may be an easier topic to get our arms around and many of the items are mandated by the legislature. Sandy Herman explained that we must address 2 things---statutory issues and Issues of Local Concern which came out of the last CAC. Staff is working on Sections II, IV, V of the EAR because it is statutory. This will be done through strikethrough and underline format for the Committee's information. She distributed the statutorily corrected Coastal -1- • • Management Element, statutory definitions of working waterfront, and talking points from that Issue of Local Concern. We will be discussing this today. Bill Vola and Bill Morris are the experts on this topic and they are here to answer questions on this area. Vola said the City is in good shape as regards disaster preparedness. Florida is the best prepared state and Clearwater and Tampa are among best-prepared cities in the state. Clearwater continues to improve the own level of competence and response, including exercises, etc. However, Clearwater is located on a peninsula on a peninsula so we are in a tough spot with regard to evacuations. A better approach is to have housing be hurricane hardened so that those people living in hardened housing do not have to evacuate, making it easier for those who must, to do so. It is beyond the City's control to significantly improve hurricane evacuation times. Zoning and density which affect safety must be balanced with economic demands. There is a shelter deficit county-wide of 75,000 spaces. Clearwater is trying to improve that figure, and this year added Ross Norton Recreation Center as a public County shelter. Delk said we have development agreements with new hotels on the beach that if there is a hurricane watch, they must get their guests off the beach. Hazard mitigation would be to expand that somewhat. Changes to density rules would make hotels more economically viable, which would also make evacuation easier than if there were all condominiums. Vola suggested There is a need to require that hotels have a specific place to send their guests to, rather than dumping them in a public shelter. Dame asked whether as residential density changes, have the Emergency Governments improved the number of shelters for them? Vola said there are limited public spaces available; there is only so much a government can do. In reality, there is also a burden on the individual to protect their homes and be prepared. Herman reminded the committee that we also need to discuss other things such as recreational and working waterfronts. Bill Morris said the City is very aggressive on expanding public access. An example of this would be the recently approved grant for $ 1.2 M for construction of downtown boatslips. Another tactic is encouraging public private partnerships in things such as parking structures, restaurants as anchors, etc. There is also the possibility of vertical evacuation too. We have been working on a Waterway Management Plan. Working waterfronts currently existing are "Quality Boats" and "Frenchy's". Clearwater will have public boatslips at the Beach Recreation Center and Island Estates. The City is also looking at Jack Russell Stadium as a potential for high and dry boat and camper storage built to hurricane standards. The City is also looking at expanding facilities at the Seminole boat launch. Dame wanted to know whether the City can provide protection through zoning for working waterfronts; specifically could this have saved Ross Boats? Delk said the City recently did the East Shore amendments to Beach By Design. In that document accessory use of docks without additional parking is permitted in order to promote water and boating access. Should the City to extend this to other areas? Morris said that this would be great if addressed the parking issue were addressed. There is a need for transient slips -2- 0 0 rather than a rental slips because that will decrease traffic and parking issues. Morris said Pinellas County hired a realtor to evaluate waterfront properties and find and partner with someone to run transient slips. Morris said Island Estates has transient docks. Madeira Beach lets you rent out private boatslips on your property. Many communities don't allow it. Sarasota has 50-60 transient slips that bring in boat clubs to hotels and restaurants and shopping. Clearwater is hoping to do this with the downtown docks. Dame said this could also work behind the Marina at the mangroves, with boardwalks through the mangroves to the slips. This would be great, especially since Clearwater Beach is very walkable. Delk said "no net loss" on boat slips is a possibility. Shall we pursue it? This would possibly impact property rights. Perhaps we could look at this like we do trees---i.e. if you delete a slip, you pay into a fund for replacement. Carlough asked about launch facilities. Morris said the City could build one on the Beach parcel, and possibly at Seminole, although that would result in a loss of parking if launch sites were added. There is great demand for slips and it would increase City revenue, and especially with budget constraints the City could use the revenue. Dunedin has condo boat slips going for $250K. In Clearwater the problem is that in many places there is not enough depth for boatslips. Green said that since fuel and other sales are related to use, what about putting a use clause in the slip lease? Morris responded that in the past the City has gone with serving the community rather than going after the money such as biggest money is with largest boats, but largest boat owners are not year-round residents. In addition, more use would require larger fuel tanks and larger fuel tanks would present environmental concerns so the City can only increase fuel sales to a point. Clayton said that from our discussion it appears that there are 4-5 key points the staff should review and we would like consensus on these as to what you want us to do: 1. Disaster management---work with smaller businesses to develop evacuation plans. 2. Mandatory evacuation as part of development agreements or development orders, and how and where and interagency agreements subject to City and County approval, especially with regard to hotel development. 3. Define working waterfronts. 4. No net loss policy for docking facilities; criteria for land use amendments that involve marine facilities, including high and dry. Impact fee type of thing or like the public art program. Morris will look for prototype ordinance. Maintenance of docking facilities is not enough, there must be no net loss. This would work for cash reserve to get the $9M high and dry proposal going. Supporting accessory transient slips due to parking issues through City land development code changes. Judy Melges asked---as regards Disaster Management---can condos be required to have a disaster plan like hotels do? Vola said probably not---due to property rights. State -3- Statute 252 gives County government most of powers of Disaster Management; the City has a narrow list of disaster management that they can do. Can public parking ramps be used for vertical evacuation? (Note: this would be for sheltering of vehicles, not people). There may be a liability issue with that. The County and City work with condo associations to get the information out. Dame said the Coastal Management Element needs to look at beach access and parks on the beach. The City should consider the recreation center site for parking if it closes. Comprehensively, Clearwater's waterfront is shallow for boating. The City should look for opportunities to acquire lands that are good for boating through acquisition or redevelopment or public-private partnerships. France said that we should bring in water conservation, especially in publicly owned properties. Delk said the staff is looking at sustainable development like LEED and green building, etc. as well as incentives for developers who use sustainable methods. Delp said we should be concerned with beach access and water access. CDB has allowed variances past few years to make them more difficult. In other words, they are allowing private development next to public property and the variances impact the public property. Trolley language should be strengthened because of its importance to tourism despite the budget concerns of funding the trolley. Should the trolley be taken out of the Comprehensive Plan because we can't fund it? Herman said staff will be contacting the committee prior to the next meeting. It will be on a Wednesday, since our poll shows this will work for everyone. The meeting adjourned 3:30 p.m. Meeting notes by Porter -4- • • CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan HOUSING MEETING NOTES- Wednesday May 28, 2008 Municipal Services Building (MSB), Conference Room 130 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Time of Meeting: 1:00 - 3:30 p.m. CAC Members Present: Glenn Bailey, Norma Carlough, Frank Dame, Billy Day, Ron Delp, Elizabeth France, Barbara Green, Bill Murray, Duke Tiernan. Councilmember Present: John Doran. Staff Present: Planning Department: Gina Clayton, Catherine W. Porter, Michael Reynolds. Legal Department: Leslie Dougall-Sides. Economic Development and Housing: Geri Campos-Lopez. Councilman Doran opened the meeting at 1:02 p.m. by thanking the Committee for serving. He also underscored how important the issue of housing is to the community. Gina Clayton welcomed the committee and thanked them for participating. Mike Reynolds discussed the difference between the Housing Issue of Local Concern and the Housing Element. He mentioned several issues discussed in the Issue of Local Concern. He then went over the changes in the draft Housing Element provided to the Committee at the meeting as compared to the draft sent out last week with the agenda. These changes were made due to comments and discussions from City staff. Clayton clarified that the word "attainable" was used because the EAR CAC thought it would be better and less controversial. Delp said he believes that "affordable" should be used. Green asked Lopez what they use. Lopez said one state program and 2 federal programs use the word "affordable". France asked in reference to 16.7.5: Is there a limitation on the amount of money that a person can put into a mobile home? No, there is not. Lopez said that the Housing Division does not support this policy because they believe mobile homes are unsafe, the Housing Division is unable to give them funds and they cannot get insurance. Carlough said that the only way the mobile home owner is protected is if they own the land; otherwise maintaining them is a waste of money. We should encourage them only if we 'can encourage land ownership and she doesn't know how we can do that. Dame said why not focus on zoning so that mobile home park owners can only redevelop as affordable developments? Day and Dougall-Sides said there may be legal issues with that kind of restriction. Reynolds then asked for additional questions and comments. Discussion followed. Murray asked what accessory dwellings are. They are in-law type, over garages, etc. 9 0 Clayton pointed out that in the downtown there are areas where accessory dwellings do not count against density limitations. Would we want to allow accessory dwellings City-wide if the density for the parcel allowed 2 units? Delp asked whether greater density engenders greater crime. Consensus is that it does not. Green and Lopez both support mixed income developments and said that there are studies that show that mixed income development is good for crime rates, especially as compared to putting all low income together. Green said good management makes all the difference. Carlough said some people are running boarding houses in single family dwellings. Clayton said she and Dougall-Sides are looking at adding a definition of family to the Code to prevent this. Discussion of whether accessory dwellings will eventually become a boarding house type use with continuous advertising and new people. Under current code, density would require 10,000 square feet of lot area in order to have 2 dwelling units, which could include an accessory unit. Carlough said boarding house should not be a dirty word---we should allow them but we need to have a method for regulating them if they become a nuisance. Clayton suggested that we could move it forward along with specific recommendations for defining family. Carlough and Delp feel we could do that if we could have a method of dealing with any problems that may occur. Clayton said Planning could map the areas of the City where density would allow accessory dwelling units so we have a better idea of what the impact would be. Bailey noted that deed restrictions may not allow accessory dwellings even if the lot size would permit it. Discussion on mobile home parks. Shall we leave 16.7.5. in, shall we be silent or come up with something else? Delp believes we need to know the extent of the numbers of mobile home owners that are low income. Unfortunately, that information is not available; however, 6.75% of dwelling units in the City are mobile homes, according to the EAR. Dame suggested to give an incentive to allow manufactured housing to replace mobile homes. Discussion of removing 16.7.5. or remove "the retention and". Do we want to encourage the retention of unsafe housing? Murray suggested "The City shall continue to recognize mobile homes as an attainable housing type." Day/Murray made it into a motion. Vote was 8 -1. Further discussion. New motion Day/Murray: Delete the first sentence of 16.4.6. and all of 16.7.5. Passed unanimously. Clayton asked for direction regarding housing for the homeless or residential shelters or transitional housing for those going from homelessness to housing. Green said that supportive housing means they have case management to help them maintain their housing and not be a neighborhood nuisance. Lopez said they provide some program funds for this. Murray said that this is such a large problem that it should be addressed on the County level. There are several County-wide programs. Lopez said that we need to at least recognize the problem in the Plan. Clayton said we will look at the County 10- year Plan for this issue and come back with some suggested language. Discussion of Habitat for Humanity and of City funds going to this and similar programs. Delp wanted to know why North Greenwood, Lake Belleview and East Gateway are called out. Lopez said it is because they are eligible for state, federal and/or special funding and have their own plan documents. Discussion of predicted population in Needs Summary. Lopez brought up that federal programs require that units built for sale to owner- occupants remain affordable for 20 years, while units built for rental occupancy are required to remain affordable 30 years, and she would like to see this included. Clayton said we could do this is in the Code. Dame said that we need to be consistent in terminology. The EAR used the terminology "attainable". Carlough thinks we should use "affordable" because it goes along with federal funding. Day agreed. Lopez suggested "Workforce Affordable". Day/Murray motion to use "affordable" consistently in the Comprehensive Plan. Passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Meeting Notes by Porter • • A- AGENDA CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Wednesday June 11, 2008 - City Hall, Room 222 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 1:00 - 4:00 p.m. PRESENT: Ronald Delp, Bill Murray, Duke Tiernan, Vonabell Sherman, Frank Dame, Barbara Green, Elizabeth France STAFF PRESENT: Michael Delk, Catherine Porter, Sandra Herman, Priyanka Thatte, Adam Tully(Planning), Scott Rice, Paul Bertels, Himanshu Patni(Engineering), Gordon Wills(Marine & Aviation), Felicia Leonard(Parks and Recreation), Leslie Dougall-Sides (Legal) MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Laurie Deer, Family Resources WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION - Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director At 1:10 p.m. Michael welcomed the Committee. He went over the timeframe and thanked the Committee for all their hard work. Herman discussed underline/strikethrough format and citations at end of each change. Most changes are statutory requirements. She asked staff to introduce themselves and their specialties. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT - Presentation by Sandra Herman, Planner III. Dame would like to see a policy on water taxi, such as consider in the future. Wills said perhaps a ferry to Beach should be considered. Murray would like to encourage bicyclists to drive opposite of traffic. Leonard said that statistically, there more accidents when they drive against traffic. Murray would also like to change 8.2.E from "appropriate" to "needed". CAC concurred. 7.2.3 Delp asked how these were prioritized and Bertels said highest accident locations get priority. Discussion on traffic cameras. Motion Delp/Tieman motion to add policy: "including improvements to enforcement efforts to prevent traffic violations." Passed 6/1. 7.4.5 US 19 is the only one in this category. Is 10.1 consistent with 10.1.2? Both should be 1,000. 10.2.4 Language was changed to reflect changing economy. • • Wells said Airpark accepts State funds, but not federal and should be reflected in Needs Summary and wherever cited. Motion Dame/Green to approve Element. Passed unanimously. CONSERVATION - Presentation by Sandra Herman, Planner III. Murray said we need a way to monitor environmental mitigation sites. Rice said Engineering is trying to do this. Motion Murray/Delp to add a policy: "Monitor and enforce agreements for treatment ponds and environmental mitigation sites". Passed unanimously. (Put under 25.2.) Motion Dame/Murray to add "or redevelopment" in 25.2.1. Passed unanimously. Rice said 25.5.1 and 4ch bullet, the sentence should stop after "standards". Motion Tieman/Murray to approve Element. Passed unanimously. RECREATION / OPEN SPACE ELEMENT - Presentation by Sandra Herman, Planner III. Dame said that as density increases we will need more park land. Leonard said that the Parks Department is gathering data so that the next time the Comprehensive Plan is revised the Level of Services may be changed based on the data. Delk said there is no statutory LOS and the LOS established by Clearwater is higher than established by many other municipalities. Delp/France motion to recommend to Parks Department to increase LOS to 4.5 acres per thousand. Passed unanimously. Motion by Dames/Sherman to check 27.1.1. and 27.4.6 and wherever else LOS is found in document. Passed unanimously. Motion Tieman/Dame to approve Element. Passed unanimously. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT - Presentation by Catherine W. Porter, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Murray wanted to know whether TBARTA is included. It is. Discussion of 28.2.8 and whether South Ward will be closed and potential reuses. Motion Tieman/Murray to approve Element. Passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m. Meeting Notes by Porter lip, CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UTILITY ELEMENT Wednesday June 18, 2008 - 1:00 - 4:00 pm Municipal Services Building (MSB), Room 130 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 MEMBERS PRESENT: Glenn Bailey, Norma Carlough, Bill Day, Ron Delp, Elizabeth France, Bill Murray, Vonabell Sherman. STAFF PRESENT: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney II; Tina Wilson, Budget Director; Michael Quillen, Engineering Director; Gordon Wills, Marine and Aviation Operations Manager; Rob Fahey, Manager, Engineering Production; Heather C. Shell, Public Information Specialist; Catherine W. Porter, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager; Sandra E. Herman, Planner III; Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, Adam J. Tully, Planning Intern. 1. INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME - Catherine W. Porter, AICP At 1:02 p.m. Porter thanked the Committee members for their service. She explained that next week's meeting will be longer because it will cover Annexation, Community Character, Redevelopment and the Future Land Use Element. These items are so intertwined that they need to be considered together. Thus, today's meeting will be shorter. II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT- Sandra Herman, Planner III Herman said that we may list a few upcoming projects included in the table since the ones listed in the current Comprehensive Plan were completed. Delp wanted to know whether increased operation and maintenance costs of new projects are shown in the CIE. Wilson said that it is documented in the Budget document, not in the Comprehensive Plan. Carlough said it would be helpful to refer the CAC to the budget document prior to asking them to adopt the Element. Wilson said it is available online and in the Library. Motion by Day/Murray to approve Element. Passed unanimously. III. '.UTILITY ELEMENT -Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III Reynolds said changes are based on the EAR. C1e&\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg061808UTILITY and CIE\06-18-08CACMtg Notes.doc Delp asked about the population projections. Porter explained the difference between population and peak population. Fahey said the current peak population is about 153,000. Carlough asked about public education regarding reclaimed and "toilet to tap" and the need to retain water restrictions. Quillen said SWFWMD is in control of how many days water must be restricted. France said if local plants are used and established, fertilizers and watering are unnecessary. Shell said the City's "green site" has lots of information about this. Delp wanted to know what we believe will happen as population increases. Quillen said that in his opinion water restrictions will continue. Day said that perhaps code should have landscaping require native plants. Discussion of adding a policy regarding educating the public on the reduction of irrigation and fertilizing, the use of native plant material, Florida-friendly plants, xeriscaping and other techniques for residential and commercial water conservation as well as incorporating this type of language into the Community Development Code, and having the City use these techniques and conserving water, etc. Discussion that City is doing some things and Parks and Recreation need to be involved as well as Neighborhood Services (enforcement of landscaping requirements); and that some of these items belong in Conservation Element, rather than Utilities. Porter suggested that the Planning Department get together with Engineering and the other appropriate departments and draft some policies and bring them back to the Committee next time for their review and comment. Motion Day/Carlough to direct the Planning Department in consultation with appropriate City departments, to prepare objectives and policies as necessary to achieve the items identified above. Passed unanimously. Discussion on Reclaimed Water: Carlough questioned if homeowners in reclaimed service areas can continue to use their wells. Fahey said that homes in reclaimed service areas are charged an availability fee ($15/month) but can continue to use their wells. He said those properties with wells prior to the reclaimed water project for Morningside would be "grandfathered" and would not have to participate in the reclaimed water program. No sewer charge for using reclaimed because of separate meters. Day asked if there is a cost or problem with discharging reclaimed. Fahey said there is not; whatever reclaimed we don't use we discharge under our permit. Bailey asked whether the City plans to discontinue purchasing water from the County. Fahey said the City wants to increase its production to 10 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) while City consumption is 14 MGD, so the City will continue to purchase water from the County. At this time the City produces C1eS:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg061808UTILITY and CIE\06-18-08CACMtg Notes.doc d 9 0 3-4 MGD. The increase will come from increasing our well fields and new reverse-osmosis plants. At I OMGD the aquifer can recharge itself, especially because of the dispersed locations of City wells. Bailey offered 2 corrections: Page D-3 correction to Summary under Stormwater, 1" bullet, last sentence remove the word "National"; and Objective 19.2 change to Pinellas County Surface Water Management Plan. Day/Murray to approve Element, with additional provisions regarding public education and conservation to be added later. Passed unanimously. IV. MAP: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (HOUSING) Porter explained that Ms. Clayton had this map developed to show which parcels in the City had the size and density to support an accessory dwelling. However, it should be noted that not all parcels would have appropriate configuration to allow for an accessory unit. At the time of redevelopment or application for addition of an accessory unit, the parcel would be studied for setbacks, parking, etc. V. ADJOURNMENT. The meeting adjourned at 1:55 p.m. Meeting Notes by Porter C1eS:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg061808UTILITY and CIE\06-18-08CACMtg Notes.doc • • NOTES CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT & EAR ISSUES OF LOCAL CONCERN: REDEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND ANNEXATION Wednesday July 2, 2008 Municipal Services Building (MSB), Room 130 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Time of Meeting: 1:00 - 4:00 pm Attendees: CAC Members: Norma Carlough, Barbara Green, Judy Melges, David Walker, Ron Delp and Frank Dame. Other Citizens: Anna Fusari, Chair, EAB, Bill Jonson City Staff: Scott Rice, Michael Delk, AICP, Gina Clayton, Leslie Dougall-Sides, Priyanka Thatte, Catherine M. Porter, AICP, Ed Chesney, Heather C. Shell, Adam Tully (Intern), Tammy Vrana, and Sandra Herman I. Welcome and Introduction. Porter welcomed everyone and introduced herself and asked everyone to each introduce himself/herself. Porter said the agenda was re-arranged and passed out the new agenda. II. City Efforts Toward Education on Environmental Issues - Heather C. Shell Shell advised the group about the City's Public Communications many efforts on subjects discussed last time including the use of fertilizers, recycling, the Think Green program, and other important environmental campaigns. She referred them to the City's MyClearwater.Com website and also advised that the City's C-News publication is published the second and fourth Thursday of the month, the City sends out letters and other documents such as the Sunshine Lines with City Utility bills, etc. to help inform the public on issues such as these discussed. III. Future Land Use Element - Catherine Porter, AICP Porter apologized on behalf of the Department for the short amount of time for review of the document. She said it is very complex and involves interdependent issues, but that we will take adequate time to discuss all the issues now. S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -1- rr • • 4 Porter said the changes involve: (1) statutory/typos and (2) added GOP's in response to the EAR Issues of Local Concern. Porter went over #2. She said the FLUE has been re- organized including Goal 2 relocated to new Goal 6 and that Goals 3, 4 and 5 have been renumbered as Goals 2, 3, and 4. Goals 5, 7 are new. Some changes address redevelopment and community character. Staff conducted research and discussed issues such as, "Does corridor redevelopment go under redevelopment or under linkages?" "Do sustainablilty GOPs go under redevelopment or under design?" IV. ISSUE OF LOCAL CONCERN: Community Character - Priyanka Thatte Thatte talked about Community Character. She said Goal 5 is new and told the group about it. She said that the design structure is something that tells us about the City Design Structure. Policies 5.1 and 5.2 are hierarchy and linkages designed. She went over destination points: City / Co. (star on key) and Church of Scientology (diamond on key). She said there were neighborhood features, etc. These together form the hierarchy. Objective 5.3 gives us corridors for preservation and Objective 5.4 is for corridors to be redeveloped. She said the Long Range Division did a large amount of field study and prepared a report which resulted in the GOP's that are now presented. Delp asked about the priorities. Delk said that this is not a priority setup.Clayton said it was intensity and economics/size intensity based. Thatte said Objective 5.5 is the one for design standards and 5.6 is for the Public Art Program. She said Citywide Design Structure should also improve the visual aspects that form uniquely "The City of Clearwater." In the report to CAC, the bullets from front page are as per EAR and green font are staff's responses. Carlough asked, "What is different about Clearwater that no one else has?" She couldn't think of anything. She felt we should protect historic things and wondered how we will do it. Then about artwork, we shouldn't be getting it from Lakeland - what does that have to do with Clearwater? The proposed art down the center of Cleveland sounded like it would be not be unique to Clearwater. For corridors, redevelopment, etc., why have pieces of Lakeland, Miami, etc. - that is not unique to Clearwater. Dame: How are we defining what makes Clearwater unique? Carlough: Regarding the current statutes at end of bridge - yes, these are unique to Clearwater - that is history. Use these as basis: orange/fruit groves, Gladiola farm, water, etc. Green: And Baseball - the Bombers softball team should be mentioned. Clayton explained that the art down Cleveland is temporary art - not being commissioned by Clearwater. S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSWE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -2- 1 • • Carlough: It should be permanent and reflect what Clearwater is and she also feels we should close Cleveland Street to traffic. Dame: The City should take an approach like Sand Pearl and incorporate the history into it - such as Old Clearwater hotel features, etc. Commission an artist to bring back history to Clearwater. Preserve historical nature. Green: Downtown Board - do they do anything for this? Clayton: No. Do you want to add a GOP to incorporate historical elements into the Art Program? Carlough: I am not sure that this is the right forum. Green: Create signature landmarks such as the Gateway - policy says to do it there. Delp: Goal 5: Identify the elements, then incorporate into what we want to move forward. Porter: The map does show some of these as a starting point, but doesn't identify history. Melges: Yellow points are neighborhood? Clayton and Thatte: List shows it. Ones on map that are yellow we can say these have a particular character - special character of its own. Like Skycrest with planet/stars street names or the University names neighborhood. Delk: Cleveland Street Corridor has unique features, neighborhood features that identify neighborhoods. Porter: History needs more study than within the scope of the current comp plan project - not typically in comp plan. Carlough: Needs to be somewhere - historic community was talked about in Lakeland, but what about St. Pete - how do they do this? Melges: Kevin Brody, sculptor, made panels on the bridge on 4th Street in St. Pete. One was of an African American who later became the city's first postmaster. We should consider this for display. Green: Other important historical facts are: freshwater spring in water behind MPH, Roebling who developed in Harbor Oaks, started his vehicle for Army here. Dame: We need to identify historical elements in the design attempt to preserve certain corridors in the city and incorporate it into the neighborhoods. S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -3- E 0 0 Vrana: Modern architecture is in some communities such as the Gateway - it (modern arch.) should also be embraced and incorporated into the plan. Clayton: Objective 5.5 Promote... Add to 5.5.2 or a new policy to incorporate historical elements into the plan. Carlough: Give examples, too vague ...like sports teams, Gladiolus farm, orange groves, sea creatures, etc. Melges: Codicil to 5.6, we should incorporate things to show what Clearwater is known for. Clayton: Is there a consensus on when to expand to add a new policy? Carlough: No need to re-create Clearwater and she thinks that is what they are trying to do. Melges: New elements - we should not be just preserving old structures but we need to show history, celebrate the past in creating new. Carlough: Creating what is unique to Clearwater - rather than re-inventing the City - the latter is her fear. Delp: We need to: (1) identify what we have that is unique, and then (2) freshly present it. Clayton, Porter: Any comments in policy in #5 to address bullets in black also found in the Issues of Local Concern? Objective 5.2 identifying the linkages and how to use this is in 5.3. Porter then summarized the "issue report" and how it all works together. Carlough: Regarding 5.3, Belleair Road is not all in Clearwater and why did staff use the word "support" here? What about the [tree] canopy in Belleair Road, is it in the City or County? Clayton: These areas are within our Planning Area and we are planning for them (upon annexation). Delk: The tree canopy is in both jurisdictions. This is something unique that we want you to take a look at (this is what we want in our GOP's). There has been a lot of staff time spent in preparing these simple sentences. Countryside Mall - is this an opportunity for infill there? Maybe look at emphasis on transit here, multi-modal opportunities there. Vrana: Policy 5.4.1 - regarding S. Martin Luther King Blvd., this is an area of non- conforming uses that are valuable such as the David & Goliath recent expansion of facility - sensitive industrial uses that are compatible with the neighborhood. Will they S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -4- ti be encouraged to stay or be redeveloped over time? She said she was concerned about this. Clayton: We will take a look at it and redefine it if necessary. Delk: This is high on my personal list. Morton Plant Hospital area is another one. We need to look at it in a holistic manner. Protect the neighborhoods at the same time as allowing uses to continue. Jonson: 5.3 Objective and 5.3.9 policy speak to the scenic or new corridors - should be scenic? Memorial Campbell Causeway is a Florida Historic Designated (FDOT) Highway - has it been addressed in the comp plan amendments? And including the GOP's as required by the program? Herman, Clayton: Yes, it has been addressed in the amendments and we will look at it again to make sure the FDOT program GOP's have been addressed properly. Delk: Affordable housing / mixed use development probably hearing a lot about this - we tried to lay ground work in here to make it happen in appropriate locations (corridors). Vrana: Density bonus? Clayton: In housing. Carlough: Cleveland Street - isn't it an entrance to Gateway? Part of Activity Center/Downtown was staff answer. Vrana: Designate the City's redevelopment areas as what they are such as East Gateway - corridor doesn't extend all the way into downtown. The entry point is the 5 point intersection at Court - it is a "Gateway" within the City. Clayton: Gateways into the City is what we used, not gateways within the City to other areas within. P. 30 defines gateways as used here. How does the CAC want to define them? Thatte: Used community character / activity centers in some cases - whole downtown area should be listed as an activity center Vrana: Goes to Highland Ave. - just reflect CRA boundary for the redevelopment corridor - all the way downtown (Cleveland St. as approaching downtown). Should extend to Court - Ft. Harrison goes to Chestnut / Court and go north to Cleveland Street. Clayton explained the Downtown Plan area. Vrana discussed adding Cleveland at San Remo west of Highland looking west to downtown as a scenic corridor. S Manning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -5- I 0 0 Delk said from Lake to water is a nice view also. Vrana asked to add Jack Russell Stadium and drop shopping and add centers, however, Porter said this was not a landmark anymore. Chesney asked about the Armory and Vrana said it could be a source of a future design theme. Green said that the JR Stadium stood out more. Clayton suggested that this was more of a neighborhood feature / character feature. Green said that this neighborhood wants to be involved a lot in decisions there. Porter: Does it all start to make more sense now on how it all fits together? We struggled with how to put it together. Carlough: Redevelopment has to define community character rather than other way around (don't recreate our uniqueness). Clayton: In some areas we want to redefine ourselves. Dame: But do we want to redefine it? Incorporate historical aspects - must be involved. Clayton: Design guidelines will be made. Chesney: Left out of corridors are Stephenson's Creek (estuary at Clearwater Harbor) and Glen Oaks stormwater project that goes right through the downtown as a "Blue" corridor. It fits into almost all corridors. Clayton: For this project, we defined corridors more in terms of land corridors. Chesney: We can't ignore these though for redevelopment. Carlough: Why point out Church of Scientology? Clayton: Because it is the 2nd largest property owner in Clearwater and a destination point. Porter added that it is identified as a campus. Clayton said a legend is to be added to go with it. She said also unique places like the cemetery near Clearwater are to be defined. Vrana said the JR Stadium is a significant redevelopment area. Porter said that the intention of the Gateways (5.2.1) is as defined in the FLUE to be the gateways to the City of Clearwater. It was discussed among the group to consider delineating interior gateways such as entrances to neighborhoods, Clearwater Beach or the Northeast Gateway, however, these are specifically identified in plans such as the downtown plan or as neighborhood features. Porter referred everyone to the map. S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -6- i 0 0 Porter then went over the new Goal 6 and bullets on report page 34. She went over the reorganization of the FLUE Goals and pointed out the new policies based on the bullets of the EAR Issues of Local Concern. One in particular is 6.2.6, the new CPTED principles added, for lighting, sidewalks, and basically providing the means for more "eyes" on properties. In response to Carlough's questions about the use of words "idled" and "grayfield" in 6.2.4, grayfield was defined as a property that is vacant, not contaminated or as dirty as a Brownfield site. Idled is a vacant property that is not abandoned, still being keep up. Clayton said we would look further into the use of the words here. Vrana recommended to also refer to "problematic" uses here. Vrana said to add something generic like Economic Development organizations and agencies to 6.1.6. Attention was given to 6.3.4 p.3.1-38 - this is a major policy shift - tool for neighborhoods in transition to help stabilize them. Clayton spoke on these neighborhoods on the edge and that we feel we need a tool to do solid planning to keep them on track, to stay competitive in region. She gave an example of Country Club Addition. She said there are CRT problems, rental problems, etc. Needs to be an effort to help stabilize the area (an NCOD - people in this area are interested in doing this). Develop a plan of action for their neighborhood to empower them. Delp asked for the signs. Clayton said one is a decline in homestead properties. Carlough and Dame both expressed their concerns about NCOD's - that they don't work as they are hard to enforce the regulations - that the neighborhoods really don't have any power and they are forced to enforce a higher level of restrictions than community code. They still must go through CRT. They don't see how to do this in a neighborhood such as N. Greenwood - don't see how to make a NCOD work there. Dame and Carlough both asked if there was a different approach than a NCOD. Carlough said the letters from CRT threatening board action work better. Clayton threw out the idea of a policy to do neighborhood planning in these neighborhoods rather than a NCOD. Delp said though that the City would still have to enforce it. He feels it should be a proactive approach. Green said Economic Development has done a great job in N. Greenwood. Clayton said that was because it was a partnership with the City and others that made it successful. Delp said some people just don't care and therefore they cause the problems. Carlough feels it works to get it to the code enforcement board to get something to change - work together with the City taking more aggressive action. Clayton said there should be planning efforts in the transition zones, and Carlough said to have the Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition getting the information out, such as how they have done on rental properties. Clayton asked what the CAC wanted to do with 6.3.4 and the group voted to eliminate the NCOD approach and go with neighborhood planning and getting information out to the residents especially by the coalition for residents to work with the City. Carlough said to do it like the City is doing with Northeast Gateway area - if it can work there it will work anywhere. Brief break was taken. S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSNE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -7- • • V. ISSUE OF LOCAL CONCERN: Redevelopment - Catherine Porter, AICP Porter discussed the Coastal Management and FLUE coordination and new CPTED policy 6.2.6. An "aging population" item in a bullet on p. 3.1-39 has been addressed in R/OS under 27.8 and 27.8.1. Bullets for activity centers and livable neighborhoods are addressed under new objective and policies 6.8, 6.8.1 thru 6.8.9. Porter said that Thatte had done a lot of work on these recommendations. Delp brought up the subject of sustainability. Delk said it is a "buzz" word for a whole lot of other terms such as walkable community, rail corridors, human scale development - depending on road width, height of buildings. Delk said "Think Green" being energy efficiency, mixed uses, discouraging reliance on road traffic. Dame said redevelopment and community character are near and dear to him on Island Estates. Delk: The problem is with code that allows disconnectivity like at Skiff Point - it was redevelopment and flexibility of code that allowed this to happen. Permitted now is conversion of a former 1 story ranch home to an 8,000 square foot house built property line to property line. Velocity zones require higher structures to be built. We need to find a way to keep the character of a neighborhood while allowing flexibility. Clayton said that it can be achieved with NCOD's however some want it to stay as is and others want bigger (such as the 8,000 square foot new house example). Delk said that conflicts in the area are huge. He said our current code is a performance-oriented code but conflicts on some issues no matter what the code is (Euclidian zoning is when you have variances that go to the board). He said it is a challenging issue - Island Estates may not want to re-visit their NCOD or they may decide to expand it to include more properties. Clayton said the multiple family properties are included in their NCOD but no real issues were identified. Dame said the City's code (CDC) is very complicated to the layman. Delk: There is more flexibility the higher up the ladder it goes - Level 3 approvals / statutory in nature go to the CC. Jonson spoke of his TBARTA tours in other cities and discussions from the tours including more mixed use / compact housing chosen along corridors that fed off transit. He said to look at transit land use development side to allow these to happen and protect the adjacent single-family neighborhoods. He said "you are on the right track". Vrana: Existing and projected transit lines including TBARTA should be included. Stations should be for transit-oriented development (increase density in these areas or along lines). Delk: In Dallas, there are expressways with hubs - we aren't there yet. Intensities / densities increase along corridors with higher density residential along corridors - hope to do - coordinate with PSTA, etc. for Drew St. Corridor, Missouri, Belcher. Would feed to more transit opportunities not just transit in place now. S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSP?E PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -8- 0 0 The discussion turned to environmental. Clayton asked to revise Policy 6.9.2 by taking "developer" out. Anna Fusari, Chair, EAB: Make the city more sustainable and reduce gases, etc. Take a holistic approach in this document. Delk asked Chesney about the USF study - where it is administratively. Chesney said he has made a presentation to the City Council and is waiting for more direction from them on this project. Delk advised on the training that staff has received in recent past on LEED. Chesney would like to see more tools and incentives in our regulations. Delk said more building side employees such as plans reviewers are being certified than planning for LEED. Chesney advised that this could be a burden right now to put in. Vrana said that "platinum" is too high to put as a requirement - she said these are rare (only 2 in US now) so that would be too high of a bar. Points are taken away for traditional parking materials (asphalt - heat asphalt effect) and number of spaces. The group discussed at length about the LEED level to strive for in the comp plan. Gold level was an achievable level however Chesney thought we should set the goal to be at Silver. The group questioned TCEA's and other alternatives to concurrency. Delk explained that concurrency is a requirement as per Growth Management Legislation of the 1980's to prevent sprawl. State started providing the tools to use and to accept a certain amount of traffic congestion to encourage redevelopment. Most of Tampa is a large TCEA - huge amount of economic development under-utilized areas there to promote infill development and transit. But this doesn't apply to the Beach, Downtown, possibly it might on US 19. Herman explained that there are other alternatives such as MMTD's. She said she would provide the group with a comparison chart of the alternatives that she had prepared. Delk said plans are there short on political will and financing. City of Clearwater is the only city to get it moving forward with the Guideway Program. Carlough said we should have done less with US19 and done light rail there. We would have been ahead of it now. Porter said that Planning and Engineering regularly attend county MPO committee meetings for coordinated efforts. VI. ISSUE OF LOCAL CONCERN: Annexation - Gina Clayton Clayton: Since our last discussion on Annexation, the courts invalidated Ordinance 00-63 that governed voluntary annexation in Pinellas County and also Amendment 1 was passed. She tried to indicate in her memo the things that have changed as a result of State Legislation. Regarding questions on expanding the tax base, Clayton said generally we only have annexations that modestly expand it. She said we want to have the opportunity to be more proactive. She referred to 7.1.2 and 7.2 for priorities and new things added. First, you had a lot of discussion previously on whether the City should pay for incentives to annex but since the passage of Amendment 1, we didn't think you would want this. Delp: Only goal is to expand the City's tax base. S Manning Department\COMPREHENSNE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -9- Carlough: And to get rid of the enclaves. Delp: Streamline our infrastructure for consistency and improve quality of life for people in enclaves. Have a timeframe to set up the standards and criteria - with a cost benefit analysis. If City shares in the cost, does it slow down, speed up or keep it as is? Clayton: Costs us more money to annex single family than we take in for taxes on these. A cost benefit analysis is more beneficial for commercial. The city conducted studies a few years ago and found that it would be extremely high cost to run sewer lines through single family subdivisions and it would take many years to recoup the costs, if at all. Clayton: We are proposing GOP's in an effort to guide us while we pursue annexation. Delp: We need a timeline. Dame: Reviewing criteria should help to prioritize. Clayton: Shift in City Council to go to more aggressive approach would be helpful. We are laying it out to get more discussion going with the County (10 acres or less as per state statutes). Delp: Should be criteria: Tax base, quality of life, and efficiency. Show benefits to them and the City. Clayton: We have a priority list of 4 areas from previous studies done by Engineering including the Allen's Creek area. Delp: We must get more aggressive. Carlough: Why is it not aggressive now? Delk: There is a competitive interaction between the City and the County and service delivery issues - urban services vs. realty issues. Clayton: And the City Council does not want to force them to annex. They have been aggressive in places like Largo and Pinellas Park but they "ruffled feathers" in the process. There was general discussion on the PPC comparison table (County vs. City) and noted that it is a bigger financial increase for non-residential. Many people don't want to be annexed, they like it the way it is in the County, even though there might be less code enforcement and they don't have as good of services such as Solid Waste (while some folks annex for this reason in addition to getting rid of their septic systems and hooking up to the City's sanitary sewer system). Delk: The very things that most people are proud of in the City, the people in the unincorporated areas don't want. And some properties in S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -10- the County are getting comparative services. Herman: We have found that some unincorporated residents don't want more code enforcement - such as, they like being able to park their cars all over their front yards. Clayton: It is not cost efficient for the City to build the sewer system (to annex). Clayton: The City had conducted a program a few years ago to provide incentives to annex 1 acre or less sites and it was minimally accepted as only a few property owners took advantage of it. Carlough: Where should it come from to get the City Council attention? Clayton: We have articulated it in our proposed GOP's. Delk: That the CAC wants them to become more aggressive. VII. Approve FLUE Melges moved for the CAC to approve the FLUE as recommended by Staff and modified today. Carlough seconded it and all were in favor. VIII. Porter went over the next steps in the timeline: Staff comments due from other departments July 11 Next CAC meeting July 30 to go over entire document If desired, you may attend the Public Hearings: Community Development Board - August 19 City Council - August 21 Review by Department of Community Affairs: August 22-October 22 Corrections to document by staff, based on DCA Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report: October 22-December, date To Be Determined Adoption Hearing in December, date To Be Determined IX: Meeting was adjourned about 4:30 pm. Notes taken and prepared by S. Herman S:\Planning Department\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive Plan\EARBasedAmendments\All Documents\EAR Based Amend Backup Files\2007-08 CAC\Mtg07-02-08 FLUE Redev CommChar Annex\070208CAC Notes.doc -I1- 0 0 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE EAR-BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MEETING NOTES - FINAL REVIEW MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 2008 -1:00 P.M. MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING - ROOM 130 MEMBERS PRESENT: Glenn Bailey, Norma Carlough, Frank Dame, Ron Delp, Barbara Green, Elizabeth France, Bill Murray, Vonabell Sherman. STAFF PRESENT: Rick Carnley, Scott Rice, Michael Delk, Gina Clayton, Catherine Porter, Sandra Herman, Michael Reynolds, Priyanka Thatte, AdamTully. 1. INTRODUCTION Herman called the meeting to order 1:10 p.m. and introduced Mr. Carnley as the City's Emergency Management Director. Clayton said that we hope the Committee will be ready to move the document forward and went over the proposed adoption timetable. She said that today we will be discussing some proposed changes and reasons for the changes. II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOCUMENT Herman went over the hand-out (memo attached to these notes): Additional Changes/Corrections. Change #l: Delp wanted to know the current level of service. Planning had asked Parks to provide this and they were unable to do so. Gina said that the Parks Department had confirmed that the LOS was based on "core systems". They are currently doing a study on whether or not to change the LOS and whether or not to change the basis of the LOS to include "special facilities". They do not want to change LOS until the study has been completed and the basis for the LOS has been determined. Change #2: No discussion. Change #3: No discussion. Change #4: Delp would like to keep the cameras in. Sherman does not. France agrees with staff recommendation. Delp wants to add a clause "such as cameras or other technologies as may develop." Dame/ Sherman motion to support staff recommendation to remove camera language. Passed 8:1. Change #5: Dame wants to add a policy: "Where appropriate, incorporate elements of City's character and history into public art forms." Carlough wants to remove "where appropriate". Dame/Carlough to add policy "Encourage the incorporation of historic and current elements of Clearwater character into public art projects." Passed unanimously. • • Change #6: Discussion of palm tree ratio to shade trees as allowed in Community Development Code. Change #7: Changes in Housing Element were done in consultation with Economic and Housing Department personnel. Barbara Green suggested adding Homeless Leadership Network to Policy C.1.11.3. Consensus to do so. Land Use Element changes: no discussion. Changes to Transportation Element: no discussion. FLUE CHANGES RECOMMENDED BY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (email included as part of these notes): Dame/Green motion to incorporate these recommendations. Passed unanimously. Delk said he and Clayton have been meeting one-on-one with Council members. The main concern the Council members have expressed is not going above statutory requirements due to budget constraints. He said they were somewhat surprised that the CAC was strongly in favor of annexing. Clayton said they are very interested in the Hierarchy of Places/Citywide Design Structure. Dame questioned A.1.2. and A1.2.1 Does this mean we cannot give Development Orders? Discussion of evacuation times, SLOSH model, new data being collected at this time, TBRPC plan and density. A.6.1.3. Does this include Island Estates? Clayton says it does not because it refers only to the area covered by Beach by Design, but we can say, "excluding Island Estates." Consensus to do so. A.6.8.3 what are we trying to encourage? Delk said good urban design such as the newer townhouses on S. Ft. Harrison. A.7.1.6. and A.7.2.1. Clayton said that this indicates that it needs to be discussed to but that we don't want to obligate the City. Dame/Green motion to change A.7.1.6 to "Utilize opinion surveys when considering.... " Passed unanimously. Map A-3 Medium Density Residential on Island Estates needs to be checked. E.1.3.6 should be also included in Mass Transit. Dame/France motion to add "The City will encourage the development of water mass transit between the mainland and beach destinations as B.3.2.3". Passed unanimously. B.4.2.4 Existing trolley service needs to be improved. Change to "A beach trolley system is encouraged to operate in order to reduce automobile trips on Clearwater Beach." Consensus to do so. Murray asked why A.1.1.2. was changed. Rice said to be consistent with the Wellhead Protection Ordinance which reflects changes in State Statutes France/Murray motion to recommend to City Council that we not reduce to 500 from 1,000 feet and change the Ordinance back in order to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Passed 6-2. Delp/Murray motion to recommend to go forward to the CDB with the EAR-based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan with changes made today. Passed unanimously. Delk thanked the committee for their help and input during this long process and encouraged them to attend the public hearings. The meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m. Notes by Porter PLEASE SEE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE REFERENCED ABOVE. To: Citizen Advisory Committee From: Planning Department Subject: EAR-Based Amendments - Additional Changes/Corrections Date: July 30, 2008 The majority of your recommendations are included in the proposal. You will see that we have added or changed a few of your recommendations due to internal administrative concerns primarily regarding financial feasibility of extra requirements and other factors such as statutory requirements and program specifications. The changes identified here are the notable ones and other changes were primarily editorial in nature or involving changes to the format of the documents. The following are changes that have been made to the final drafts that are notably different than the discussions and/or recommendations of the CAC. Reasons are provided for the changes. Change #1 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT: 4"' bullet in needs summary and Policy G.1.1.1. The notable change involved maintaining the 4.0 LOS rather than increasing it to 4.5 as recommended by CAC, based primarily on the following current statement in this needs summary bullet: "...it is found that a current Level of Service (4.9) acres per one thousand (1,000) persons is provided." Parks and Recreation has found no source to support this statement. Without further study that would justify a change in the LOS, and as the statutory rules for concurrency require maintaining the adopted level of service standards for parks and recreation, the current 4.0 LOS for parkland should be maintained as recommended by the EAR. Also, the Budget Office was concerned about the increase in LOS from a financial feasibility standpoint. Change #2 Removed requirements to establish level of service standards for pedestrian and bicycles on roads as there are no identified statutory requirements for these level of service standards and there are currently no funding sources identified to make these type of improvements in the city. Change #3 In addition to eliminating pedestrian and bicycle road improvements, the City's Budget Office has recommended to make changes to the proposed language in a few of the elements (including Transportation and Recreation / Open Space) that required road or other such type of capital improvements to be made as they present a concern of financial feasibility - this change involves using the words "As funds become available" or "When applicable" or "As articulated in the City's budget document". Other concerns were that requirements were made from "approved" plans such as the City's 2006 Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan" that was not adopted. Examples are: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Objective G.7 and Policies G.7.1 through G.7.4 and TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy B.2.3.2. Change #4 Did not include the requirement in TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy B.1.2.3, to install cameras to track vehicles running red lights for enforcement efforts to prevent traffic violations. The Transportation Manager states that it is covered already in this policy, as the City will be utilizing appropriate remedies dependent upon accident causes, so this additional wording is not necessary to place in the Comprehensive Plan. Change #5 The proposed objective and policies regarding the Art Program in the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT have been revised as recommended by Parks and Recreation Department in accordance with the City's Public Art and Design Program (refer to A.5.6 and Policies A.5.6.1 through A.5.6.5) Change #6 Regarding the CAC's discussion of limiting use of fertilizers and using "native" landscaping, the proposal does now include new words to require "Florida friendly" as recommended by the City's Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments in the CONSERVATION ELEMENT needs summary and in Policy F.1.1.1. The previous word "native" is no longer recommended in this usage. Public awareness and education programs for preserving the environment are existing in the needs summary for the CONSERVATION ELEMENT and the City has an extensive educational program that includes the Sunshine Lines stuffer for utility bills, and the City's web site (for example the Think Green Guide) for guidelines on the use of fertilizers, xeriscaping, and water restrictions to preserve the environment. Change #7: Other changes include: In Housing Element relating to homelessness, Policy C.1.5.6 the affordable housing, suitable for rehabilitation and special needs housing definitions; the density bonus provision for affordable housing added to the Future Land Use Element Policy A.2.2.7; changing the policy relating to view corridors (Bayview and Magnolia Street) Policy A.5.3.9; the addition of objectives and policies for the Courtney Campbell scenic highway designation in Transportation Element Objective B.1.7 and policies B.1.7.1 through B.1.7.9; the addition of two golf courses to the hierarchy of places map A-14; the issues relating to housing without plumbing in Housing Needs Summary; the clarification of the objective regarding NAHAB in Housing Element C.1.8 Objective and policies C.1.8.1 through C.1.8.9. We respectfully request that you consider the documents as proposed in your approvals today. 0 0 From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:09 PM To: Porter, Catherine; Herman, Sandra Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Proposed FLUE Comments These are the final comments from E.D. I think they are probably good changes. Lets suggest to CAC today. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Vrana, Tammy Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:45 AM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Subject: Proposed FLUE Comments Good job AD Clayton. Of course, I must offer my 2 cents on LU/transportation policies. I don't have strikethrough on my email so changes are indicated by additions only (in red). Thank you for the opportunity to comment. TV A.5.2.8 Identifv P.S.T.A. Routes: those corridors in the Citv of Clearwater along which the PSTA (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority buses gRerate. (EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Community Character and Livable Neighborhoods) Consider rephrasing to use generic "transit service" instead of "buses "... A.6.8.1 Build active, attractive communities that are designed at a human scale and encourage walking, cycling and use of mass transit. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) A.6.8.7 Create mixed-use, higher density, livable communities through design, layout and Nvalkability techniques within existing proposed transit corridors. including _proposed TBARTA lines and stations. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) Consider extending the policy's emphasis to existing and proposed transit corridors of all agencies, not just TBARTA.. PMI is rolling again and may beat TBARTA to the punch. Also, federal transit finding is highly sensitive to whether local gov`ts have transit-supportive land use policies in place at the time of fi-tnding. • s A.6.8.9 Promote a varietv of transportation modes such as walkin bicycling,, ride sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the sin le-occupancy automobile. (EAR Part V, changes to Florida Statutes and Administrative Rules and EAR Part III, Issues of Local Concern: Changes in Redevelopment) Tammy Vrana, AICP I Community Development Coordinator Economic Development & Housing Department City of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 PHONE: 727.562.4047 1 FAX: 727.562.4075 1 MOBILE: 727.415.1200 rn D Z D r 0 0 c rn ?z N "o ?1 . STATE OF FLORIDA I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS D to FEB 19 ? ` ,? PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES making Florida a better place to call home" The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard: February 13, 2009 > Y :ter G? Q.S VM C-eSl Q' tax ? n. The Department of Community Affairs (Department) has completed its review of the adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of Clearwater (DCA Number 08-2AR), adopted by Ordinance 7993-08 on December 18, 2008, and determined that it meets the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, for compliance, as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. The adopted amendment package consists of an update to the Comprehensive Plan based on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The Department is issuing a Notice of Intent to find the plan amendment in compliance. The Notice of Intent has been sent to the Tampa Tribune for publication on February 16, 2009. The Department's Notice of Intent to find a plan amendment in compliance shall be deemed to be a final order if no timely petition challenging the amendment is filed. Any affected person may file a petition with the agency within 21 days after the publication of the notice of intent pursuant to Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes. No development orders, or permits for a development, dependent on the amendment may be issued or commence before the plan amendments take effect. Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c)2., Florida Statutes, requires a local government that has an Internet site to post a copy of the Department's Notice of Intent on the site within 5 days after receipt of the mailed copy of the agency's notice of intent. Please note that a copy of the adopted City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Notice of Intent must be available for public inspection Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays, during normal business hours at the City of Clearwater Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756. THOMAS G. PELHAM . Secretary 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ? TALLAHASSEE. FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) ? 850-921-0781 (f) ? Website: www.dca.state.fl.us • COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2355%(p) 850-488-3309 (? • FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST 850-922-2207 (p) 850-921-1747 (f) • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-488-7956 (p) 850-922-5623 (0 The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard February 13, 2009 Page Two If an affected person challenges this in-compliance determination, you will have the option of mediation pursuant to Subsection 163.3189(3)(x), Florida Statutes. If you choose to attempt to resolve this matter through mediation, you must file the request for mediation with the administrative law judge assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The choice of mediation will not affect the right of any party to an administrative hearing. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Jenkins, Senior Planner, at (850) 922- 1803. Sincerely; Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning MM/vj Enclosure: Notice of Intent cc: Sandra Herman, Planner III, City of Clearwater Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS NOTICE OF INTENT TO FIND CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN COMPLIANCE DOCKET NO. 08-2AR-NOI-5206-(A)-(I) The Department gives notice of its intent to find the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Clearwater, adopted by Ordinance No. 7993-08 on December 18, 2008, IN COMPLIANCE, pursuant to Sections 163.3184, 163.3187 and 163.3189, F.S. The adopted City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report, (if any), are available for public inspection Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays, during normal business hours, at the City of Clearwater Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756. Any affected person, as defined in Section 163.3184, F.S., has a right to petition for an administrative hearing to challenge the proposed agency determination that the Amendment to the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan is In Compliance, as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1), F.S. The petition must be filed within twenty-one (21) days after publication of this notice, and must include all of the information and contents described in Uniform Rule 28-106.201, F.A.C. The petition must be filed with the Agency Clerk, Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, and a copy mailed or delivered to the local government. Failure to timely file a petition shall constitute a waiver of any right to request an administrative proceeding as a petitioner under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. If a petition is filed, the purpose of the administrative hearing will be to present evidence and testimony and forward a recommended order to the Department. If no petition is filed, this Notice of Intent shall become final agency action. If a petition is filed, other affected persons may petition for leave to intervene in the proceeding. A petition for intervention must be filed at least twenty (20) days before the final hearing and must include all of the information and contents described in Uniform Rule 28- 106.205, F.A.C. A petition for leave to intervene shall be filed at the Division of Administrative Hearings, Department of Management Services, 1230 Apalachee Parkway, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060. Failure to petition to intervene within the allowed time frame constitutes a waiver of any right such a person has to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., or to participate in the administrative hearing. After an administrative hearing petition is timely filed, mediation is available pursuant to Sub-section 163.3189(3)(a), F.S., to any affected person who is made a party to the proceeding by filing that request with the administrative law judge assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The choice of mediation shall not affect a party's right to an administrative hearing. c Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahasee, Florida 32399-2100 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call-home" CHARLIE CRIST Govemor THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary November 10, 2008 The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard: The Department has completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of Clearwater (DCA Number 08-2AR), which was received on September 11, 2008. Based on Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we have prepared the attached report, which outlines the Department's findings concerning the amendment. It is particularly important that the City address the objections set forth in our review report so that these issues can be successfully resolved prior to the adoption of the amendment. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. Within the next 120 days, the City should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. 'The proposed Amendment (DCA Number 08-2AR) is an update to the comprehensive plan based on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). In general, the issues identified in this Objections Recommendations, and Comments Report relate to the potential to increase residential density within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the lack of a planning timeframe, concurrency management policies, capital improvements planning, and further clarification of the affordable housing provisions. Our report includes recommendations to help the City in addressing these issues prior to the adoption. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) • 850-921-0781 (f) • Website: www.dca.state.fl.us • COMMUNITY PLANNING 860 4N8-2356 (p) e50-488-3309(Q • FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST 850-922-2207(p) 850-921-1?47 (r) • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-488-7956 (p) 850-922-5623(f) • The Honorable Frank V. Hibbard November 10, 2008 Page Two We are available to assist the City in responding to our report. Please contact Valerie Jenkins, Senior Planner, at (850) 922-1803, if we may be of further assistance in the matter. Sincerely, Charles Gauthier, AICP Director, Division of Community Planning CG/vj Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Review Agency Comments cc: Sandra E. Herman, Planner II, City of Clearwater Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this report, the City has 124 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-11.011, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3139(2)(a), F.S. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the City must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional, planning council's review of the amendment, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the-Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event no names, addresses are provided, please provide this information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 08-2ARA November 10, 2008 Division of Community Planning Office of Comprehensive Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010, F.A.C. INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the City of Clearwater's proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan (DCA Number 08-2AR) pursuant to Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Fart II, F.S. Each objection includes a recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objections. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. Each of these objections must be addressed by the local government and corrected when the amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections, which are not addressed, may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items, which the local government considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its.non- applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments, which follow the objections and recommendations section, are advisory in nature and will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AMENDMENT 08-2AR I. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163, PART II, FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.), AND RULE 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.) The City's proposed Amendment 08-2AR is the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based plan amendments to update the Comprehensive Plan. The Department raises the following objections and comments to proposed Amendment 08-2AR. OBJECTIONS: A. Future Land Use Element: 1. Lack of Planning Timeframe: The Future Land Use Map does not indicate the future timeframe for which it is intended consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. Section 163.3177(5)(a), F.S., requires that comprehensive plans include at least two planning periods, one covering at least the first 5-year period occurring after the plan's adoption and one covering at least a 10-year period. [Section 163.3177(5)(a), (6)(a); and Rules 9J-5.005(4), F.A.C.] Recommendation: Include with the amendment a Future Land Use Map with the future timeframe for which it is intended clearly stated on the map consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. 2. Density Bonuses for Affordable Housing Incentives: Proposed Policy A.2.2.7 to the Future Land Use Element requires that the City provide density bonuses to developers of affordable housing and/or mixed-income developments based on recommendations established in the City's Housing Assistance Plan. Likewise, proposed Policy C.1.10. of the Housing Element would provide for density bonuses for affordable housing projects that are constructed consistent with the US Green Building Council. However, there is no policy in the City's Plan to define the amount of development that will be granted under a bonus program, and how it will be implemented. Additionally, the proposed bonus program has the potential to increase residential development in the Coastal High Hazard Area; however, the proposed policies do not ensure that such density bonuses would not be permitted on properties located within the City's Coastal High Hazard Area. Therefore, the proposed policies could direct population concentration to the Coastal High Hazard Area. [Sections 163.3177(6)(t)l.f ; 163.3178(l) and (2)(h); 163.3178(9)(a), F.S.; and Rules 9J- 5.005(6); Rule 9J-5.010(3)(b)7.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)1, (3)(b)5., 6., & 7.; 9J-5.016(3)(b)2, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise these policies to define the amount of residential development that will be granted under a density bonus program, and how the program will be implemented by the City. Additionally, include language to these policies that would ensure that such density bonuses are not being permitted within the Coastal High Hazard Area. 3. Comment: Objective A.4.1 and Policy A.4.1.1 refer to levels of service for traffic circulation. However, the policy should be revised to refer to levels of service for roads instead of traffic circulation. B. Coastal Element: 4. Coastal High Hazard Area Map: Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 creates the Coastal Storm Area definition which encompasses the Coastal High Hazard Area. A map depicting the Coastal Storm Area boundary as an area that includes the Coastal High Hazard Area boundary is provided. However, based on the statutory requirements, the Coastal Storm Area map does not make a clear distinction between the Coastal Storm Area and Coastal High Hazard Area boundaries. Therefore, the City's Plan is not proposed to be revised to identity the Coastal High Hazard Area as required by law. [Section 163.3178(2)(h), F.S., and Rules 9J-5.006(4)(6)6.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)3., F.A.C.] Recommendation: Amend the Coastal Storm Area Map to clearly depict the Coastal High Hazard Area/Category 1 Storm Surge, as defined by Section 163.3178(2)(h), F.S. 5. Public Expenditures within the Coastal High Hazard Area: Proposed Policy E.3.1.4 appears to contradict proposed Policy E3.1.3. While Policy E.3.1.3 states that the City will "limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in Coastal High Hazard Areas except for the restoration or enhancement of native resources," Policy E.3.1.4 states that the City will "ensure that construction of necessary infrastructure improvements in the coastal storm area are phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment in support of the proposed densities of the Future Land Use Element." Thus, Policy E.3.1.4 has the potential to subsidize development that will increase density within the Coastal High Hazard Area. [Sections 163.3178(1) and (2)(h); 163.3178(9)(a), an d Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J- 5.012(3)(b)5., 6., & 7.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)l; 9J-5.016(3)(b)2, F.A.C] Recommendation: Revise proposed Policies E.3.1.3 and E.3.1.4 to be internally consistent and to require no subsidization of development that will increase density within the Coastal High Hazard Area. 2 6. Comments: Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 does not reference the correct Coastal Storm Area Map. Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 identifies Map-13 as the Coastal Storm Area map; however, the Coastal Storm Area map included as part of the map series is identified as Map E-1. Therefore, the City should revise Objective E.1.2 and Policy 1.2.1 to identify Map E-1 as the correct Coastal Storm Area map. • Proposed Policy E.4.1.9 provides for the preparation of a post-disaster redevelopment plan in an effort to reduce or eliminate the exposure of human life and public and private property to natural hazards. However, the policy does not specify a date by which the City will have its post-disaster redevelopment plan prepared. C. Capital Improvements Element: 7. Lack of Potable Water Supply Concurrency: The Capital Improvements Element does not address the requirements of Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., pertaining to water supply concurrency which requires the following: that adequate water supplies be in place and available to serve new development no later than the issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; and that prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the local government shall consult with the applicable water supplier to determine whether adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. (Section 163.3177(6)(a) and (c); 163.3180(2)(a), F.S. Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J-5.0055(3); 9J-5.011(1 and 2); 9J-5.016(3)(c)5 and 6, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise the amendment to include a policy to ensure that the applicable water supplier is consulted prior to the issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent to ensure potable water supply will be available prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy as required by Section 163.3180(2)(a), F. S. 8. Lack of a Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements: This EAR-based amendment is not accompanied by an update of the Capital Improvements Element to include an updated Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements as required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)5., F.S., which addresses the capital improvements needs of the City during the next five years. [Sections 163.3164(32); 163.3177(2), (3)(a), (3)(b), (3)(c), (3)(d), and (3)(e).; 163.3177(6)(a), (c), (8), F.S, and Rules 9J-5.005(2)(a), (c); 9J-.005(5); 9J-5.055(2)(a); 9J- .006(2)(a), 9J-5.011(1)(b), (f) & (2)(b) & (c) and 9J-5.016(4)(a), F.A.C.] 3 Recommendation: Include, in the plan, a financially feasible Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements with committed funding for improvements in the first three years and planned funding for the remaining two years of the Five-year Schedule. The data and analysis pertaining revenues and expenditure have to be updated to show that there is adequate fund in each identified source to pay for the listed capital improvements. Also, the data and analysis supporting the Five-year Schedule should include an update of the projected capital improvement needs of the City and show that the improvements on the schedule will maintain and achieve the adopted level of service standards. This should be done by assessing what improvements are needed to achieve and maintain level of service in the short term planning horizons, the cost of the improvements for the short teen, the funds available to pay for the improvements, and the timing of the improvements. For long term projected capital facility needs, the comprehensive plan must include long- term strategies which include programs and activities for the elimination of existing capacity deficits (Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)l.b., F.A.C.), but need not be accompanied by a demonstration that funding for projected needs is currently available or available from planned funding resources. Rather, these strategies should be embodied in policies that, as with others in the comprehensive plan, spell out the way in which programs and activities are conducted to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for the long term. 9. Lack of Adopted Level of Service Standards in the Capital Improvements Element: With the exception of schools, the Capital Improvements Element does not set forth the level of service standards for public facilities subject to concurrency which is required by Section 163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S. [Section 163.3177(3)(x)3., F.S., and Rules 9J-5.005(3); 9J-5.0055(2)(a)l., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., and 8.; 9J-5.015(3)(b)3; 9J-5.016(3)(c)4., F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise the Capital Improvements Element to include a policy that establishes level of service standards for public facilities subject to concurrency. 10. Lack of Concurrence Requirements for Roads: The proposed amendment to the Capital Improvements Element does not include changes to address the new requirement in the law pertaining to transportation concurrency. Pursuant to Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S., transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. To address this issue, Policy 1.1.3.3, subsection 3, references Policy 1.1.3.3.1 and 1.1.3.3.2 which do not include provisions addressing the update to the law cited above. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S., and Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J-5.0055(3); 9J-5.016(3)(c)5. and 6., F.A.C.] 4 Recommendation: Revise Policy 1.1.3.3, subsection 3, to delete reference to Policies I.1.3.3.1 and 1.1.3.3.2, and to include provision that will ensure that transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation in order to be consistent with the above cited provision of the law. D. Transportation Element: 11. Lack of Planning Tirneframe: The Future Transportation Map and map series (Map #'s B-1, B-3, B-4, B-5, B-7, B-8, B-9, B-11, and B-12) do not indicate the future timeframe for which they are intended consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. Section 163.3177(5)(a), F.S., requires that comprehensive plans include at least two planning periods, one covering at least the first 5-year period occurring after the plan's adoption and one covering at least a 10-year period. [Section 163.3177(5)(a); and Rules 9J-5.005(4), F.A.C.] Recommendation: Include, with the amendment, a Future Transportation Map and map series with the future timeframe for which they are intended clearly stated on all maps consistent with the planning timeframe for the City's comprehensive plan. 12. Comments: • Objective B.1.5 states that, "All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. However, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requests that the City revise this objective to delete reference to the State Roadways. • Policy B.1.5.5 states that, "The City shall participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee to ensure that the level of service standard for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System facility will be consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of `D' for this road. However, the FDOT requests that the City revise this policy to state that the LOS standard for US 19 is "D". F. Housine Element: 13. Density Increases/Accessory Dwelling Units for Affordable Housing Projects: Proposed Policies C.1.9.1 and C.1.9.4 would permit density increases for projects incorporating affordable housing units. However, the policies do not clearly define the amount of additional density possible to be allowed in a particular land use category and to also restrict such bonuses from occurring within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Additionally, proposed Policies C.1.1.8 and C.1.9.5 to this element and A.6.1.12 to the Future Land Use Element would allow accessory dwelling units within the City based on sufficient parking, and other standards. However, the City's Plan does not include adequate standards guiding the development of accessory dwelling units, such as defining the density of use that will be allowed, requiring that such accessory units are not built within the Coastal High Hazard Area and that the assessment of public facility impacts take into account the accessory units. [Sections 163.3177(6)(f)l.f ; 163.3178(1) and (2)(h); 163.3178(9)(a), F.S.; and Rules 9J- 5.005(6); Rule 9J-5.010(3)(b)7.; 9J-5.012(2)(e)1, (3)(b)5., 6., & 7.; 9J-5.016(3)(b)2, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise Policies C.1.9.1 and C.1.9.4 to clearly define the amount of additional density to be allowed in a particular land use category as affordable housing bonus. Additionally, revise Policies C.1.1.8 and C.1.9.5 to clearly define the amount of density to be established for accessory dwelling units. Furthermore, revise the policies to require that affordable housing bonuses as well as accessory dwelling units are not allowed on properties located within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Also, define the tern "accessory dwelling units" and require that the assessment for public facility impact take into account the affordable housing units as well as accessory dwelling units allowed. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendments do not adequately address and further the State Comprehensive Plan, relating to the following goals and policies: • Goal 6.a, (Public Safety); Policy 6.b.23; (The amendments related to Objections 2 and 13); • Goal 7.a, (Water Resources); Policies 7.b.5; (The amendments related to Objection 7); • Goal 17A (Public Facilities); Policies 17.b.5; (The amendments related to Objection 8); • Goal 19.a, (Transportation); Policies 19.b.3, and 19.b.13; (The amendments related to Objection 12); • Goal 25.a., (Plan Implementation); Policy 25.b.7 (The amendments related to all of the above objections). Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendments to be consistent with the above goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan, as recommended in this report. 6 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Kenneth T. Welch - Chairman Ronnie E. Duncan - vice Chairman Calvin D. Harris Susan Latvala John Morroni Karen Williams Seel Robert B. Stewart August 4, 2006 Brenda Winningham FL Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 RE: City of Clearwater Proposed EAR Pinellas County PLAN N IN G AUG ./ <01,6 Dear Ms. Winningham: This letter is in response to your request for comments on the City of Clearwater's proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). We have the following comments regarding transportation concurrency: 1) 2) It is recommended that the City of Clearwater adopt the countywide transportation concurrency recommendations that were approved by t e Pinellas the pouts nPlan ning ns was Pis Organization this past May. Among the recom County to adopt the Level of Service standard on County roads (LOS C/D: average daily/peak hour and volume/capacity ratio: <0.9). Secondly, it is stated in the EAR that the City s EAd? theeDowntownr the Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas (TC ) fo where Beach, other activity centers, and other non-activity c not be pursued.Clf the Ci y appropriate. It is recommended that the TCEA designation does pursue the option to establish a TCEA, alternatite st ateg1esn need tofor included in .the Comprehensive Plan to support and fund a modes to accommodate the impacts upon an already strained system. There are no further comments on other EAR issues and recommendations. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed EAR. Sincerely, Brian K. Smith Bureau Director cc: Michael Delk, Planning Director, City of Clearwater PLEASE ADDRESS REPL) T0: 600 Cleveland Street . Suit-2 750 Clearwater, Florida 33-55 Phone: (727) 464-8200 Fax: (727) 464-8201 website: vvww.pinellascoun.:•or8 n Chair Robert A. "Bob" Kersteen November 1, 2006 ® 1? r Tamps Bav eglonal Planning Co undl Vice-Cljair JiltColrins Mr. Ray Eubanks Community Program Administrator Plan Processing Unit Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Secretary/ Treastaer Cononi.ssiorter Scott Bladt Executive Director Mauna Pionarierga The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed its review of the City of Clearwater's Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Staff did not identify any problems or conflicts between the adopted EAR and the Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan. Council staff looks forward to reviewing the City's EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments. Sincerely, C' i Je sica White Senior Planner cc: Michael Delk, AICP,.Planning Director Brenda Winningham, DCA 400o GatintlaJ Centre BOU(evarcl, Suite too • Pinellas Park FL 337$2 Pboue: 727-570-5 15 1 • Fax 727-570-5 1 18 • State Number: 5 13-5 066 • )rn,xI.tbrpc oYg i F- 4,111 .E _ « rc Talmadge G. "Jerry" Rice Chair. Pasco Judith C. Whitehead ce Char. Herr.ardG Nell Combee Secretary. Po'.',. Jennifer E. Closshey Tresscrer. H:I!storcu;n Thomas G. Dabney Sarasc'a Heidi B. McCrea H:;ISborG::, Sallie Parks Plre. Southwest Florida lVaterManaoement District Bartow Service Office 170 Century Scu'e.ard Bartcv:, Florida 33830-77GO (863) 534-1448 c' 1-800-;92.7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Lecanto Service Office suite 226 3600 %Vest Sovereign Pa h Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 October 24, 2006 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL on!y) SUi,D01 1531-6900 D. Ray Eubanks, Plan Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813)' 985.7481 or. 1-800-836A797 (FL o,y $-V- iGOM 578=2Q70 Subject- Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City of Clearwater Todd Pressman i P ne: as Maritza Rovira-Forino I H.:ISOCroc?- I Patsy C. Symons ; ce3=?? ?i David L Moore _1er L ' Drtec'Jr i William S. Bilenky GerEra.CocrS Dear Mr. Eubanks: ?/._-7/6 The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review process for the City of Clearwater's Evaluation and Appraisal Report. We would like to commend the City on putting together a well-organized and detailed approach to identifying subjects to emphasize in future updates of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plans. The District notes that our previous recommendations to the City, via an agency coordination meeting on March 29, 2005, have been addressed in this assessment. The District appreciates the City's proactive, approach to these issues and looks forward to collaborating with the City of Clearwater on future projects. Please feel free to contact me at the District's Planning Department at (352). 796- 7211, extension 4423 should you require further assistance. Sincerely, Etc l ?? ?-C ??/ t,4 ?,. Lori H. Belangia Pinellas-Anclote River Basin Planner cc: Michael Delk, AICP, Clearwater Planning Director Jim Quinn, DEP (Via e-mail) Rand Baldwin, SWFWMD Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH GOVERNOR November 1, 2006 1 1201 N. McKinley C;ive • Tampa, FL 33612 b 56 Phone (813) 975-6000 • 1-800-226-7220 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 r 1 ?W Ir?c?o? DENVER J. STUTLEA JR. y SECRETA?Y NOV 3 2006 RE: City of C1earRvater Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Dear Mr. Eubanks: We have reviewed the City of Clearwater Adopted EAR, which is an attractive and user friendly document. A few things are worth mentioning, as we did for the proposed EAR. The Adopted EAR indicates that the City- «-ill ensure consistency between Plan amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2025 and the Rule 14-94, F.A.C. Please be aware that the Plan needs to be consistent with MPO plans on an ongoing basis, including the (annual) Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The EAR includes Objective 7.5 on page 2.4-19, which mentions backlogged or constrained State roadways. The Transportation section of Table 4.2 includes Objective 7.5 and indicates that the Objective is implemented and should be maintained. We disagree. Objective 7.5 should be revised to remove reference to backlogged or constrained State roads. Rule 14-94, Florida Administrative Code no longer recognizes backlogged facilities-, the Rule includes Statewide Minimum LOS Standards for the State Highway System, and no longer includes a separate LOS standard for backlogged or constrained facilities. Please ensure that this Objective, as well as any other text in the Plan that references backlogged or constrained State roadways, is appropriately revised. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed EAR. If you have any questions, please call me at (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, 4, "e dl. . Carol M. Collins, LGCP Coordinator cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT Michael L. Delk, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater t ,4 P. IC. 5 S October 10, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear. %Mr. Delk: TBank you very much f l,_ or the o portunlt'. to the Clty of Cl,-::-v--at-.r's Eval..a;ion and :appraisal Repo.-L. As before, %Vc fOtlad it ver: well=re_earch?d and wonderfully presented. Again, we found no conflict between Clearwater's EAR and the City of Dunedin's recently adopted EAR. There ,vere, in fact, several common themes, including issues related to build-out conditions, concurrency (particularly for public education facilities), design standards and working waterfronts. Again, thank you for allowing us to review your EAR. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (72.7) 298-3197. Sincerely, A /--Z- riatn3er • F. Dow II cc: Ray Eubanks, DCA Lti!22(',)6 %IDEARI.T.!06 -T,;:,, l..iiij of Dunciii?i :i.11!5 ??J: .;i: VII'ZiS Of Y:i=C', C.^•1 1i:ii:i?T1:7? i?)"ICU?, Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH 11201 N. McKinley Drive e Tampa, FL 33612-6456 GOVERNOR Phone (813) 975-6000 • 1-800-226-7220 November 1, 2006 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 DENVER J. STUTLER, JR. SECRETARY RE: City of Clearwater Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Dear Mr. Eubanks: We have reviewed the City of Clearwater Adopted EAR, which is an attractive and user friendly document. A few things are worth mentioning, as we did for the proposed EAR. The Adopted EAR indicates that the City will ensure consistency between Plan amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2025 and the Rule 14-94, F.A.C. Please be aware that the Plan needs to be consistent with MPO plans on an ongoing basis, including the (annual) Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The EAR includes Objective 7.5 on page 2.4-19, which mentions backlogged or constrained State roadways. The Transportation section of Table 4.2 includes Objective 7.5 and indicates that the Objective is implemented and should be maintained. We disagree. Objective 7.5 should be revised to remove reference to backlogged or constrained State roads. Rule 14-94, Florida Administrative Code no longer recognizes backlogged facilities; the Rule includes. Statewide Minimum LOS Standards for the State Highway System, and no longer includes a separate LOS standard for backlogged. or constrained facilities. Please ensure that this Objective, as well as any other text in the Plan that references backlogged or constrained State roadways, is appropriately revised. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the any questions, please call me at (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, ?" r vl ` &A"?' Carol M. Collins, LGCP Coordinator cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT ECEHL D NOV 3 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Michael L. Delk, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater , f www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER Tampa SayXeglonal Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Robert A. "Bob" Kersteen Jill Collins SecretarN/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Scott Bloch MannN Pumarieya November 1, 2006 Mr. Ray Eubanks Community Program Administrator Plan Processing Unit Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed its review of the City of Clearwater's Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Staff did not identify any problems or conflicts between the adopted EAR and the Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan. Council staff looks forward to reviewing the City's EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments. Sincerely, j sica White enior Planner cc: LM chae_l Delk, AICP,. Planning Director Brenda Winningham, DCA RECEIVED NOV 0 U9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 0 o o Gatewap Centre Boulevard, Suite i oo • Pinellas Part, FL 33782 Pbone: 727-570-5151 • Fax: 727-570-5118 • State Number: 5 13-5o66 • wwwt6rpc.or0 RECEIVED P I N E L LA S OCT 0 2 2006 P LAN N I N G PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNCIL CITY OFCLEARWATER COUNCIL MEMBERS 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 • Clearwater, Florida 33755-4160 Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton, Chairman Mayor Jerry Beverland, Vice-Chairman Telephone 727.464.8250 • Fax 727.464.8212 • www.pinellasplanningcouncil.org Councilmember Sandra L Bradbury Treasurer September 27, 2006 The Honorable Frank Hibbard, Mayor City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard: Mayor Bob Hackworth, Secretary Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember David W. "Bill" Foster Mayor Pat Gerard Mayor Dick Holmes Vice-Mayor Jerry Knight School Board Member Linda S. Lerner Mayor Mary H. Maloof Commissioner John Morroni Vice-Mayor Andy Steingold David P. Healey, AICP Executive Director During the 2007-08 fiscal year, the Pinellas Planning Council will continue its Evaluation and Appraisal Report local assistance effort. At the recent EAR-based amendment forum hosted by the PPC, municipal representatives were informed about the future assistance available from this agency. This letter provides additional information regarding, available-assistance. ` In short, PPC assistance, to be provided in cooperation with oupe-tamed consultant, the Gail Easley Company; will take-two forms: First; certain information will -be made available to every jurisdiction. For example, the PPC and/or our consultant will develop and make available.-common data sets and model goals', objectives,-and policies Items 1 through 19 in the table starting on page 3 of this letter present the information to be made available to all jurisdictions. Second, if jurisdictions request additional and/or customized assistance, it will, 7be ,,,,,provided using. consultant services- and/or in=house resources. The-following (refer to items 20 through 31 in the attached table) are. examples of additional and/or customized assistance that could be provided: (a)=adaptation of model,goals, objectives, and--policies (GOPs)to thezneeds-of-the jurisdiction; .(b) the preparation of any supplemental data and, analysis; (c)-preparation of elements not-included•in the model-GOPs; (d)-preparation. of the :full-- amendment package and' `subsequent revisions-:based. on-,DCA ..review or. compliance -with -PPC--rules,, (e) participation in -staff meetings, public workshops.and-. public.hearings with the local planning agency and elected body; . (f) .meetings_with.DCA:: during-=initial and compliance review;. and (g) other. tasks necessary to-complete the F amendment process. -- Jurisdictions requesting additional assistance will be charged and those funds will be-used .to -supplement the PPC budget for in-kind services. Charges will :be .negotiated -between. PPC staff'and individual jurisdictions after identifying local needs, project complexity; and .the level of PPC stafUconsultant effort `needed to fulfill-the needs.3The final not-to- PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY tt i •L f I? f ? 1 f- 1 1 ? I I } f ? exceed negotiated charges will be calculated on the time and materials basis set forth in the PPC interlocal agreement we have with each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions can plan and budget for PPC additional/customized assistance over two fiscal years. Jurisdictions have 18 months after a DCA finding. of sufficiency to adopt EAR-based amendments. So, for example, if a jurisdiction requests $10,000 in additional assistance, in most cases, that amount need not be budgeted in just the first fiscal year. But, because of the nature of the EAR-based amendment process, costs are front-loaded meaning that most of the work takes place at the beginning of the process. Thus, while expenditures can span two fiscal years, we recommend that jurisdictions split the funding on a two-thirds first year and one-third second year basis. It should also be noted that while EAR-based amendment expenditures should be budgeted, those funds may not have to be totally expended. Nonetheless, PPC staff advises jurisdictions requesting additional assistance to not under budget the project even if all of the funds at the end of the amendment process have not been expended because funds will be required to update local land development regulations that implement comprehensive plan changes. In conclusion, if your jurisdiction requires assistance over and above that provided to all municipalities (including maps and other graphic products), you are invited to make that requirement known through a formal request. As stated above, not-to-exceed charges will be negotiated between PPC staff and individual jurisdictions after identifying local needs, project complexity, and the level of PPC staff/consultant effort needed to fulfill your needs. If such additional assistance is required, a timely request is advisable because while it may appear that there is an abundance of time to do the required work, in reality, there is little time to waste. Therefore, if you adopted your EAR by October 1, 2006, please make your written request, if possible, not later than November 1, 2006. Otherwise, please make your request no later than December 1, 2006. If you have questions or concerns you would like to discuss before making a formal request for additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Mr. David Healey, Pinellas Planning Council Executive Director. Sincerely, Larry S. Pfl eger Principal Planner cc: Mr. William B. Horne, II, City Manager Ms. Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk Mr. Michael Delk, Director of Planning 2 ? c0 EAR-Based Amendment Tasks a Q ? Notes a to a M a O i O. a U U U U c L IL IL a a a a E O FY 2006-07 1. Prepare a detailed evaluation of the County data and analysis prepared for its EAR based amendment. Determine applicability to municipalities. Prepare spreadsheet or other documentation of data for use by municipalities. Prepare guide for using and/or f adapting data and analysis when adopting it by reference. Provide spreadsheets and guides for data sets for each element, if available. (All municipalities.) 2. Determine availability of data from SWFWMD from the Regional Water Supply Plan. Prepare guide for municipalities required to prepare a water supply facilities work plan to incorporate data from the RWSP by reference. (All municipalities.) 3. Identify applicable projects from MPO-TIP for municipalities. Prepare spreadsheet or other documentation for use by municipalities. Prepare guide for incorporating projects into CIE. (All municipalities.) i 4. If not provided in the County data and analysis, collect data for the housing element. Prepare a preliminary analysis and a guide for each municipality to use in preparing additional municipal analysis. (All municipalities.) 5. If not provided in the County data and analysis, collect data for the recreation/open space element. Prepare a preliminary analysis i and a guide for each municipality to use in preparing additional I municipal analysis. (All municipalities.) I 6. If not provided in the County data and analysis, compile data for the intergovernmental coordination element. Prepare a preliminary analysis and a guide for each municipality to use in preparing I additional municipal analysis. (All municipalities.) 7. Assist municipalities, as requested, with visioning processes. 8. Prepare inventory of maps to be used in data and analysis and prepare a spreadsheet or other documentation of maps available and maps needed for each municipality. (Municipalities requesting mapping services from PPC.) 9. Prepare updated existing land use maps for municipalities. I i Prepare table of acreages for each land use category for each map. (Municipalities requesting mapping services from PPC.) i 10. Where needed, prepare updated maps needed for the data and i analysis for municipalities. (Municipalities requesting mapping i services from PPC.) 11. Review data available from each municipality to support its comprehensive plan. Determine whether the data is applicable and best available for use in supporting EAR-based amendments. Prepare spreadsheet to identify availability of data for each l element. (Municipalities requesting mapping services from PPC.) 12. Prepare model intergovernmental coordination goals, objectives, and policies. (All municipalities.) 13. Prepare model coastal management/conservation goals, objectives, and policies, including new CHHA requirements. (Municipalities on the barrier islands.) 14. Prepare model potable water goals, objectives, and policies for municipalities receiving water through Tampa Bay Water. 15. Prepare model solid waste goals, objectives, and policies. (All municipalities.) 16. Prepare model sanitary sewer goals, objectives, and policies for I municipalities relying on County wastewater services. 17. Prepare model groundwater recharge goals, objectives, and policies. 18. Prepare model financial feasibility spreadsheet for municipalities as an alternative to the FIAM. I 19. Determine capital projects to be constructed and needed to meet LOS standards in each municipality from County, regional, or State funding sources. Prepare a spreadsheet or other documentation for municipalities to use in preparing the CIE. (All I municipalities.) 20. Prepare future land use goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan I amendment services from PPC.) j 21. Prepare transportation goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 22. Prepare housing goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) i 23. Prepare stormwater goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 24. Prepare wastewater goals, objectives, and policies for municipalities with municipal systems. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 25. Prepare potable water goals, objectives, and policies for municipalities with municipal systems. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 26. Prepare recreation/open space goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) I 27. Prepare coastal management/conservation goals, objectives, and policies for municipalities not on barrier islands. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) { 28. Prepare capital improvements goals, objectives, and policies. Prepare concurrency management system objectives and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting plan j amendment services from PPC.) i I 29. Adapt model elements to individual municipalities who will transmit It is assumed that all in 2007 that request plan amendment services from PPC. I municipalities either will be exempt or will adopt the County Public School Facilities Element by reference. 30. Prepare maps in the map series for adoption. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2007 requesting mapping services from PPC.-) 31. Assist municipalities with public workshops. (Municipalities i requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) FY 2007-08 32. Prepare index to 9J-5 requirements for use by each municipality to ensure consistency with minimum criteria. 33. Prepare future land use goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 34. Prepare transportation goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 35. Prepare housing goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) i 36. Prepare stormwater goals, objectives, and policies. (Municipalities _ who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 37. Prepare wastewater goals, objectives, and policies for municipalities with municipal systems. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 38. Prepare potable water goals, objectives, and policies for ' municipalities with municipal systems. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 39. Prepare recreation/open space goals, objectives,. and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 40. Prepare coastal management/conservation goals, objectives, and policies for municipalities not on barrier islands. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 41. Prepare capital improvements goals, objectives, and policies. Prepare concurrency management system objectives and policies. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 42. Adapt model elements to individual municipalities who will transmit in 2008 that request plan amendment services from PPC. 43. Prepare maps in the map series for adoption. (Municipalities who will transmit in 2008 requesting mapping services from PPC.) 44. Prepare a transmittal checklist, mailing list, and sample letters for use by each municipality during the transmittal process. 45. Prepare an adoption checklist, mailing list, sample letters, and sample adoption ordinance for use by each municipality during the i adoption process. 46. Assist municipalities with the public hearings for transmittal of plan amendments. (Municipalities requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 47. Assist municipalities with responses to the ORC report and revisions to the proposed plan amendments resulting from the ORC. (Municipalities requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) 48. Assist municipalities with public hearings for adoption of plan amendments. (Municipalities requesting plan amendment services from PPC.) H:\USERS\WPDOCS\LA\E A R NEW\Correspond\Assistance invitation.doc i?? Azw Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH 11201 N. McKinley Drive e Tampa, FL 33612-6456 GOVERNOR Phone (813) 975-6000 • 1-800-226-7220 November 1, 2006 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 DENVER J. STUTLER, JR. SECRETARY RE: City of Clearwater Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Dear Mr. Eubanks: We have reviewed the City of Clearwater Adopted EAR, which is an attractive and user friendly document. A few things are worth mentioning, as we did for the proposed EAR. The Adopted EAR indicates that the City will ensure consistency between Plan amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2025 and the Rule 14-94, F.A.C. Please be aware that the Plan needs to be consistent with MPO plans on an ongoing basis, including the (annual) Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The EAR includes Objective 7.5 on page 2.4-19, which mentions backlogged or constrained State roadways. The Transportation section of Table 4.2 includes Objective 7.5 and indicates that the Objective is implemented and should be maintained. We disagree. Objective 7.5 should be revised to remove reference to backlogged or constrained State roads. Rule 14-94, Florida Administrative Code no longer recognizes backlogged facilities; the Rule includes Statewide Minimum LOS Standards for the State Highway System, and no longer includes a separate LOS standard for backlogged. or constrained facilities. Please ensure that this Objective, as well as any other text in the Plan that references backlogged or constrained State roadways, is appropriately revised. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the any questions, please call me at (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, 1 J 'd ?I , Carol M. Collins, LGCP Coordinator cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT D E-CEVE. NOV 3 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER 'Michael L. Delk, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER Southwest Florida Water Management District O .?'t... GEt+[b'- An Equal w^"z4..k Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office Opportunity Employer 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 3600 West Sovereign Path (863) 534-1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 572-6200 Talmadge G. "Jerry" Rice Chair, Pasco Judith C. Whitehead Vice Chair, Hernando Neil Combee Secretary, Polk Jennifer E. Closshey Treasurer, Hillsborough Thomas G. Dabney Sarasota Heidi B. McCrea Hillsborough Sallie Parks Pinellas Todd Pressman Pinellas Maritza Rovira-Forino Hillsborough Patsy C. Symons Desoto David L Moore Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel October 24, 2006 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at. WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 D. Ray Eubanks, Plan Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard- Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800.836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 . Subject: Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Eubanks: mxa _ The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review process for the City of Clearwater's Evaluation and Appraisal Report. We would like to commend the City on putting together a well-organized and detailed approach to identifying subjects to emphasize in future updates of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plans. The District notes that our previous recommendations to the City, via an agency coordination meeting on March 29, 2005, have been addressed in this assessment. The. District appreciates the City's proactive approach to these issues and looks forward to collaborating with the City of Clearwater on future projects. Please feel free to contact me at the District's Planning Department at (352) 796- 7211, extension 4423 should you require further assistance. Sincerely, u _ _ Lori _H. Belangia Pinellas-Anclote River Basin Planner cc: Michael Delk, AICP, Clearwater Planning Di Jim Quinn, DEP (Via e-mail) Rand Baldwin, SWFWMD Ion t h vE i OCT 3 0 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER OF CITY OF DUNEDIN "Dedicated to Quality Service" P.O. BOX 1348 DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34697-1348 (727) 298-3000 October 10, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr. Delk: Thank you very much for the opportunity to review the City of Clearwater's Evaluation and Appraisal Report. As before, we found it very well-researched and wonderfully presented. Again, we found no conflict between Clearwater's EAR and the City of Dunedin's recently adopted EAR. There were, in fact, several common themes, including issues related to build-out conditions, concurrency (particularly for public education facilities), design standards and working waterfronts. Again, thank you for allowing us to review your EAR. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 298-3197. Sincerely?,O ry F. Dow Manner II cc: Ray Eubanks, DCA RECEIVED OCT ,12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT LM2006 MDEARLT.106 CITY OF CLEARWATER 'The City of Dunedin does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, and disabled status in employment or the provision of services" STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH THADDEUS L. CHOEN, AIA Governor Secretary October4, 2006 Ms. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Ms. Clayton: Thank you for submitting copies of the City of Clearwater adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) adopted by Resolution No. 06-49 on September 21, 2006 for our review. The submission package appears to be complete, and your adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report will be reviewed in accordance with procedures contained in Chapter 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be asked to provide additional supporting docu- mentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review. The Department's preliminary sufficiency finding will be mailed to you on or about November 29, 2006, and a final sufficiency finding will be determined no later than December 28, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact Brenda Winningham, Community Program Administrator for region 1, who will be overseeing the review and assigning the Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the respective planner for review at (850) 488-4925. Sincerely, D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing DRE/dj cc: Manual Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council RECEIVED OCT 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.f1.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon; FL 33050.2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32398-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9989 (650) 488-7956 i RECEC) ` DEC 01 2006 ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIiY OF CL.EARWATER STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" THADDEUS L. COHEN, AIA JEB Go BUSH Secretary Governor November 29, 2006 The Honorable Frank Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater City Hall 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 RE: City of Clearwater Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report Resolution Number 06-49 Dear Mayor Hibbard: The Department has completed its 60-day preliminary sufficiency review of the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the City of Clearwater, adopted on September 21, 2006, by Resolution Number 06-49. The Department has determined the adopted EAR is sufficient, pursuant to Subsection 163.3191(2), Florida Statutes (F.S.). This finding of Sufficiency should be taken as the final determination of the Report. Please note that a sufficiency determination does not constitute a compliance review of the proposed amendments identified in the Report. The amendments referenced in the Report, as well as any other amendments shall be reviewed for consistency with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code when submitted as proposed amendments. Additionally, the City must take into consideration the new 2005 statutory requirements. Additional provisions in Section 163.3177(3)(a) and (b) F.S., require an annually updated, financially feasible, 5-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Section 163.3180(2)(x) F.S., has updated water supply planning requirements. Section 163.3191(10), F.S., includes further language pertaining to the timely adoption of the EAR-based and other comprehensive plan amendment. With regard to it's EAR-based amendment, the City should review Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., as amended by Senate Bill 360 and made effective on July 1, 2005 (Chapter 2005- 290 Laws of Florida) to determine how the recent legislation affects the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100' Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http,//www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 .._...?._ ai aan'r>_»» Tallahassee, FL 32399 -21 00 I.-... - Mayor Frank Hibbard November 29, 2006 Page 2 We would like to take the opportunity to complement the City for preparing an extremely well organized and well-prepared EAR We are particularly impressed with the manner in which the City's visioning process was folded into the development of the EAR. We appreciate your effort, and are available to provide any needed assistance to the City of Clearwater as it prepares the EAR-based amendments. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me at (850) 922-1800, or Dan Evans, Senior Planner, at (850) 922-1805. Sincerely yours, / Z//? Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator DW/de cc: Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director, City of Clearwater COUNCIL MEMBERS r ater, Florida 3 3 755-41 60 Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton, Chairman a 8212 • www.pinellasplanningcouncil.org Council Mayor Jmembererry Sandra BeverL.land, Bradbury, Vice Chairman y, Treasurer Mayor Bob Hackworth, Secretary Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember David W. "Bill" Foster f' Mayor Pat Gerard AUG 3 2006 Mayor Dick Holmes a Vice-Mayor Jerry Knight MEMORANDUM School Board Member Linda S. Lerner Mayor Mary H. Maloof PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Commissioner John Morroni Vice-Mayor Andy Steingold SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWAV David P. Healey, AICP k, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater Executive Director FROM: Larry Pflueger, Principal Planner SUBJECT: EAR-Based Amendment Forum DATE: August 1, 2006 Each local government in the State of Florida is required to periodically review its state- mandated comprehensive plan. That review results in a document called an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), and must be followed eighteen months later by EAR-based comprehensive plan amendments. Realizing that there is a need for information regarding how to develop and process EAR- based amendments, the Pinellas Planning Council will be hosting an EAR-Based .Amendment Forum on September 12th, 13th, and 14th at the Harborview Center in t downtown Clearwater. A flyer with registration form is attached. The program for the 12th and 13th will be identical, except that it will be held in the afternoon on the 12th and in the morning on the 13th. These initial "get acquainted" sessions will give a general introduction to the plan amendment process. They are designed for government and private sector planners, planning board members, elected officials, other municipal staff, and anyone else interested or involved in the amendment process. A workshop training day will 'be conducted on the 14th. The training will consist of a number of of breakout sessions dealing with all aspects of the -comprehensive. plan amendment process. These sessions are intended for planners or other municipal representatives .who will be authoring the EAR-based amendments or elected decision makers who will be assisting in their development and adoption. We hope to see you and/or other representatives of your community at the forum. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727.464.8250. O'l PINELLAS PLANNING C OUN C I L PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY 4 0 DEPARTMENT STATE OF FLORIDA OF COMMU A ?ii NITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Govemor April 13, 2006 THADDEUS L..COHEN, AIA Secretary RECEIVED APR 18 2007 PLANNING DEPAR'RVW CITY OF CLEARWAfER The Honorable Frank Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater Office of the City Council P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard, The Department of Community Affairs has reviewed your letter of March 16, 2006, which outlines the scope of work for the preparation of the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The Department agrees with the summary of the issues as set forth in the • attached document. The City should be aware of newly enacted legislation (Florida Senate Bill 360, now codified as Chapter 2005-290, Laws of Florida) amending Chapter 163, Part H, Florida Statutes, including the EAR requirements. As of July 1, 2005, all evaluation and appraisal reports must address, as applicable, two new evaluation topics: Section 23 3191_(2)(6)))))) 01S el 'al i g¢ _ ?.. district"s, and Section 163.3191(2)(p), F.S. relating to the implementation of the local government's concurrency management system. The new legislation also revised the EAR requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(k), F.S. relating to coordination of the comprehensive plan with existing public schools, and Section 163.3.191(2)(1), F.S. requiring an evaluation of the success of the local government in identifying and implementing alternative and traditional water supply projects necessary to meet the local government's water supply needs. In addition, Florida House Bill 955, now codified as Chapter 2005-157, Laws of Florida, revised the requirements of Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, to require comprehensive plans to include waterways in the comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation and to include in the Coastal Management Element shoreline component management strategies that will be used to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts defined in Section • 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD $ TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: httD://www.dca.state.fl.us a???s 1 CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway. Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shur-ard Oak Boulevard 25:5 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Mayor Frank Hibbard Page 2 of 2 April 13, 2006 3421.07, F.S. The EAR should include an evaluation of the City's Plan in relation to these issues and include recommendation for updating the Plan in the EAR-based amendments to address the new requirements. The EAR process is an essential component of comprehensive planning for local governments in Florida. The Department wishes to encourage your efforts in carrying out this important evaluation and review process. If you or your staff have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact me at (850)922-1800. Sincerely, /Y' Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator B W/ed Enclosure • cc: Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Brian Smith, AICP, Director, Pinellas County Planning Department Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director, City of Clearwater 0 r? LONG RANGB PMANNING DM:vMzi.oPmM:Nr Ri-mi-v September 28, 2006 CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r Orru;i: Box 4748, CLEARWATER, RomDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SE:RViCis I3uuI)WC, 100 Sourii MvR-ru; Aw.NCB, CLEARWATER, Pl.oim)A 33756 I'M:M.M:PrioNM; (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re: Transmittal of Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report - 2006 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Pursuant to F.S. 163.3191(2)(p)(6) please find attached three copies of the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Additionally please find three copies of the legal advertisement of the adoption hearing and three copies of the action agenda of the adoption hearing. The Clearwater Community Development Board, acting as the City's Local Planning Agency, held a public hearing on the draft EAR on September 19, 2006 and recommended approval to the Clearwater City Council. The Evaluation and Appraisal Report was adopted by the City of Clearwater after a public hearing was conducted by City Council on September 21, 2006 pursuant to Resolution 06-49. Copies of this correspondence, the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and all related attachments are being sent to the following agencies under separate cover on September 28, 2006: Pinellas County Planning Department; Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council; Southwest Florida Water Management District; Florida Department of State; Florida Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental Protection; Pinellas Planning Council; City of Belleair Beach; Town of Belleair; City of Safety Harbor; City of Largo; and City of Dunedin. FNANK IM It AID ,, I1(w:%N, Cui up-\Iil mri< Ikwi I I\\III rO.\, COI wl,NII:ml r:i< 0 (.:\RI FN A. PFI F.RSEN. G )I NC .Nih:NIRFK lin.i.Ju tiu?. (:ni xrai. Iit liter I ni ni I uinc\u:,-r.?v) Ar[ inrnr Arrui,? I mirnri:" i ,' If you have any questions or need further information, please contact: Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4587 Fax: 727-562-4865 www.gina.cla3qon@myclearwater.com The report remains available for public review at our offices between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. and will soon be posted on the City's website. Please advise me regarding the completeness of this adoption package. Sincerely yours, 7 Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director Attachments N? ATER, LONG RnNGI: PLANNING D13VIiI,oPM1:N7' Rimi--w September 28, 2006 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy Ot rnci: Box 4748, Cu-:ARWA'I'1?It, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SI:RVICGs BUILDING, 100 Soti'1'li MYR'I'LH AwNUk, CuiARWA'I'i:it, FLoRIDA 33756 THLITHONE, (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Brian K. Smith, Planning Director Pinellas County Planning Department 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Richard H. Kephart, Senior Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Lori H. Belangia, Planner 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Frederick P. Gaske, Director R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Fl 323-99-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Lindy McDowell, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 City of Belleair Beach Reid Silverboard, City Manager 444 Causeway Boulevard Belleair Beach, FL 33786 FIONR I IIHR.VM, MANOR JuiIN I)nR: , 0)t "( 11AI MIN; I [())-I I Inwi:rci . COi Noll olim it ISn.i. )c, u, , Cni ,v(: i.UP:>IIwl" ("AWLh:N A. P1 rr.RSr.N, (;rn \CIL I MER i tp% , ID. Town of Belleair 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Belleair, FL 33756 City of Safety Harbor Ron Rinzivillo 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 City of Largo Steven B. Stanton, City Manager 201 Highland Avenue Largo, FL 33779 John Lawrence, City Manager City of Dunedin Post Office Box 1348 Dunedin, FL 34697 RE: Transmittal of 2006 Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City of Clearwater To whom it may concern: Pursuant to F.S. 163.3191(2)(p)(6), the City of Clearwater is transmitting one copy of its adopted 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the aforementioned agencies. This packet also includes the legal advertisement of the adoption hearing, a copy of the action agenda of the adoption hearing; and the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. If you need further assistance, please contact Gina L. Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, at 727-562-4587. Sincerely, Michael L. Delk, AICP Director of Planning ,A, A. ,4 ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COUNCIL MEETING Thursday, September 21, 2006 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers 1. Call to Order - 6:00 p.m. 2. Invocation - Reverend Jack Alwood, Bethel Presbyterian Church. 3. Pledge of Allegiance - Mayor. 4. Presentations - Given. I herebyomfflfY that this is a ava and 4.1 State Legislative Session Report - Rep. Kim Berfield correct copy of the miginal as It appeam 4.2 Service Award -One. in the files of the City of Clearwater. mg hand 4.3 APGA 5 Year Safety Award for 2001 - 2005 Witness ?C© and o6cisl aeai of earwi ? _r Y- A _ZA 4.4 Proclamation - Library Card Sign-Up Month - September 2006 nism,11f 4.5 Proclamation - Public Natural Gas Week October 1-7, 2006,x, 4.6 Proclamation - Somebody Cares Tampa Bay 4.7 Proclamation - Clearwater Jazz Holiday - October 19-22, 2006 4.8 Proclamation - Commuter Choices Week - September 25-29, 2006 5. Approval of Minutes 5.1 Approve the minutes of the September 7, 2006, City Council Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. ACTION: Approved as submitted. 5.2 Approve the minutes of the September 5, 2006, Council Special Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. ACTION: Approved as submitted. 6. Citizens to be Heard re Items Not on the Agenda Tom Sehlhorst complained regarding fines and penalties assessed against him. John Wiser thanked Councilmembers Petersen and Doran for attending Mr. & Mrs. Countryside event; asked for alterative forms of irrigation for two medians on Countryside Boulevard between US19 and 580. Steve Sarnoff, CWA Union Rep said the quality of life in Clearwater is why people come here; asked Council and City management to work with employees to identify improvements. Joe Evich and John Soltis expressed concerns regarding reclaimed water service plans for Morningside and beach communities. Rick Wagner asked the City to find ways to avoid costly litigation re firefighters. Public Hearings - Not before 6:00 PM 7. Administrative Public Hearings 7.1 Approve the applicant's request to vacate the 16-foot alley portion that lies adjacent to the rear property line of Lot 5, Block 16, Milton Park, (a.k.a. 711 Pinellas Street), subject to a condition of approval, and approve Ordinance 7688-06 on first reading, (VAC2006-10 Critchle)(1. ACTION: Approved. Council Action Agenda 2006-09-21 7.2 Adopt the Final Evaluation and Appraisal Report of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and PASS Resolution 06-49. ACTION: Approved. Resolution adopted. 7.3 Amend and adopt Ordinance 7673-06 on second and final reading; amending the millage rate from 5.42 mills at first reading of the ordinance to 5.2530 at second reading1 'm. "' Se tember 0 "20Qr, for operating 'T : purposes including the fun a road mainterance for capital improvement expenditures at 5.; AICi'IO.N' Ordinance Adopted as amended to 5.2088 mills. ?.-Arnand-,and- ad General Fund salaries by $501,000; increasing the contribution to the Florida Orchestra by $20,000; decreasing the subsidy to the Jolley Trolley by $28,000; decreasing the subsidy to the Performing Arts Center and Theater. Inc. (PACT) $300,000; decreasing the contribution to the Capital Improvement Program for street and sidewalk improvement and maintenance by $500,000; changing the funding source of the Sailing Center Expansion proiect in the amount of $400,000 from General Fund to Penny for Pinellas; and adopt Ordinance 7674-06 as amended on second reading adopting the City of Clearwater Annual Operating Budget for 2006/07. ACTION: Ordinance Adopted as amended. 7.5 Amend and adopt Ordinance 7675-06 on second reading to include the $450,000 project for the Countryside Community Park Concession and Restroom Building funded from grants and donations approved by the Council on September 7 2006• change the funding source of the Sailing Center Expansion project in the amount of $400,000 from General Fund to Penny for Pinellas; reduce the road millage funding in the Streets Sidewalks & Bridges protect by $500,000 from $3,488,030 to $2,988,030; adopt Ordinance 7675-06 as amended on second reading, adopting the Fiscal Year 2006/07 Capital Improvement Budget; and approve a six-year plan for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). ACTION: Ordinance Adopted as amended. 8. Quasi-judicial Public Hearings 8.1 Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the County Residential Urban (RU) Category to the City Residential Urban (RU) Category and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family Residential District to the City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 3012 Tennessee Avenue (Lot 9 Block 4 Bay View City Subdivision in Section 16. Township 29 South and Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinance 7680- 06, 7681-06 & 7682-06 on first reading. ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 8.2 Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the County Residential Low (RL) Category to the City Residential Low (RL) Category and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County AE, Agricultural Estate Residential District to the City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1885 CR 193 (Consisting of Metes and Bounds 41-0.3, in Section 5, Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinance 7683-06 7684-06 & 7685- 06 on first reading. ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. Council Action Agenda 2006-09-21 8.3 Approve the Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the Commercial General (CG) category to the Residential Urban (RU) category and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the Commercial (C) District to the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for property located at 1101 Howard Street (Lots 77-80, Carolina Terrace Annex) and Pass Ordinance 7667-06 and 7668-06 on first reading. ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 9. Second Readings - Public Hearing 9.1 Adopt Ordinance 7654-06 on second_readinq, amendinq the Code of Ordinances to establish the construction proiect delivery method referred to as "Design-Build" and the procedure to be followed in selecting firms to provide design-build services and negotiating design-build contracts; amending Section 2.541, Code of Ordinances to add definitions, and creating a new Section 2.601 to outline procedures for awarding design-build contracts. ACTION: Ordinance Adopted. 9.2 Adopt Ordinance 7686-06 on second reading, amending Chapter 29 of the Code of Ordinances to increase the additional homestead exemption for persons 65 and older from $10,000 to $25,000. ACTION: Ordinance Adopted. City Manager Reports 10. Consent Agenda - Approved as submitted, less Item 10.16. 10.1 Approve an Agreement between the City of Clearwater and the Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce (CRCC) for tourism services in Fiscal Year 2006-2007 in return for fundinq in the amount of $190,000 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. 10.2 Authorize settlement of the workers' compensation claim of John Moros in its entirety to include medical, indemnity and attorney fees, costs, and liability claim for the sum of $65,000 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 10.3 Approve a new Capital Improvement Project (CIP) for the installation of gas mains within the City of Clearwater residential communities; approve the initial funding of this CIP with $157,200 from General Fund Retained Earnings; and approve in concept the August 2006 proposal "Extension of Natural Gas Mains in Existing Residential Communities within the City of Clearwater". (consent) 10.4 Approve the Award of Bid 29-06 Installation of Gas Mains and Service Lines at Various Locations in the amount of $1,185,000 (actual bid of $983,914) and approve the issuance of a Purchase Order to Mastec North America, Incorporated 7221 East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33619 in the amount of $1,098,750 for the period October 1 2006 to September 30, 2007 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 10.5 Authorize the renewal of a contract for health insurance with United HealthCare under a fully insured funding arrangement for the contract period of January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2007, at a total not to exceed cost of $16,500,000 which includes estimated City ($11,700,000), employee ($3,400,000), and retiree ($1,400,000) premiums, and award a three-year contract to Unipsych Benefits of Florida, Inc. for EAP and mental health/substance abuse coverage for City employees and their covered dependents for a not to exceed amount of $200,000 ($180.000 for Council Action Agenda 2006-09-21 I current employees and $20,000 for retirees) per year for a total of $600,000 for the period January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009. 10.6 Award a contract to State of Florida, Department of Management Services, Tallahassee, Florida - Suncom long distance service, State AIN Centranet lines, and toll free long distance lines during the period October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 at a cost not to exceed $183,250. 10.7 Award a contract to Verizon Florida, Inc., Saint Petersburg, Florida - Telephone service including frame relay internet service, T1's, Centranet trunks, directory advertising, long distance overflow, and credit/collect calls during the period October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007, at a cost not to exceed $429,950 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent) 10.8 Award a contract to Sprint/Nextel, Los Angeles, California - Cellular/radio service during the period October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 at a cost not to exceed $218,880. 10.9 Approve FY 06/07 Blanket Purchase Orders to Baker & Taylor Books -$250,000; Ingram Book Company - $130,000; and Ebsco Subscription Services - $100,000. 10.10 Consider Parks and Recreation Board recommendation to rename the East West Recreation Trail that currently runs from Bayshore Boulevard to the Long Center to Ream Wilson Clearwater Trail. (consent) 10.11 Award a contract between the City of Clearwater and TriTech Software Systems, in the amount of $894,721.00, to replace the Clearwater Police Department's Computer-Aided Dispatch System, software for the implementation of mobile CADS data, and two (2) servers. This replacement is contingent upon the approval of two (2) earmark grant budget amendments, totaling $939,295.00, by the United States Department of Justice, and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. 10.12 Award a contract to Smith & Wesson, Springfield, MA, for the purchase of 300 Smith & Wesson, Model M&P40, .40 caliber weapons at a cost of $123,000; and declare surplus and authorize trade-in of 300 Walther P990 .40 caliber weapons for a credit of $78,600 (net cost $44,400) in accordance with Sec. 2.564 (1)(e) - Impractical to bid, and authorize officials to execute same. (consent) 10.13 Request approval for the City of Clearwater to enter into agreements of understanding with significant reclaimed water users: Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation. Inc.; Clearwater Country Club.-Inc.; Countryside Country Club, Inc.; and the Parks & Recreation Department, to clarify liability, obligations and responsibilities to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and new metering rate structure. 10.14 Accept a 5-foot Sanitary Easement over, under and across the West 5 feet of Lot 135, GLENWOOD SUBDIVISION, conveyed by Flores, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, given in consideration of receipt of $1.00 and the benefits to be derived therefrom. 10.15 Accept an 18-month temporary construction easement containing 4,950 square feet, and a perpetual Drainage and Utility Easement containing 1,382.68 square feet, more or less, over, across and upon a portion of Lot 25, HILLCREST ESTATES FIRST ADDITION, conveved by Council Action Agenda 2006-09-21 4 Brian R. and Marian Pingor, husband and wife (Grantor), in consideration of receipt of $1.00 and the benefits to be derived therefrom. 10.16 Approve a renewable 5-year term interlocal agreement with Pinellas County Government allowing the County to use the Ross Norton Recreational Facility as a Public Disaster Shelter and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. ACTION: Approved. 10.17 Approve purchase of excess liability, crime EMS policies, boiler & machinery, marina operations liability, and flood insurance coverages for an amount not to exceed $580,000, authorize appropriate officials to execute same and authorize staff to negotiate and purchase propefir insurance coverage for expiring/expired layers of property insurance if cost effective and to self insure those layers for which cost effective insurance is not available, such purchases to be brought back to the Council as a ratify and confirm at the next subsequent Council meeting.. 11. Other items on City Manager Reports 11.1 Adopt resolutions to file liens as follows:1) Resolution 06-17 for $12,832.40 on 1111 LaSalle Street; Greenwood Park Number 2, Block F, Lot 29: Owner of record: Shawn Johnson & Alexandria Wilburn, 12086 134th Place, Largo, Florida 33778;2) Resolution 06-18 for $4,934.34 on 1126 Tangerine Street; Greenwood Park, Block C, Lot 29 and W 10feet of Lot 30; Owner of record: Reuben L. Triplett & Sylvia Triplett, 1349 Springdale Street, Clearwater, Florida 33755.3) Resolution 06-19 for $6,772.11 on 608 Harold Court; Marshall & Brandon's Subdivision, Lots 7, 8, & 9 & E 20ft. of Lot 10 & vacated easterly 80 ft. of Harold Court per 0. R. 13949: Owner of record: Harold Court Townhomes LLC, 2506 S. MacDill Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33629.4) Resolution 06-20 for $4,568.83 on 321 Coronado Drive; Columbia Sub. No. 2. Block A, Lot 6; Owner of record: Roland Rogers, 321 Coronado Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33767 and the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. ACTION: Approved. Resolution 06-17, 06-18, and 06-20 adopted. Resolution 06-19 pulled. 11.2 Approve a Joint Participation Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District Seven, to provide funding of $436,000 this fiscal year and $1,857,670 in fiscal year 2007 to the City of Clearwater to resurface SR 60/Cleveland Street/Gulf to Bay Boulevard within the corporate limits of Clearwater, Florida, from West of Pierce Boulevard to Highland Avenue and Adopt Resolution 06-51 authorizing it's officers to execute this Joint Participation Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation, District Seven. ACTION: Approved. Resolution adopted. 11.3 Amend the City's fiscal year 2005/06 Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets at third guarter and pass Ordinances 7710-06 and 7711-06 on first reading. ACTION: Approved as amended. Ordinances passed 1" reading. 11.4 Approve a Supplemental Local Agency Program Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of $3,793,748 for the Beach Walk project. ACTION: Approved. Miscellaneous Reports and Items Council Action Agenda 2006-09-21 E 12. City Manager Verbal Reports 12.1 Authorize Filing in Circuit Court of Application to Vacate Arbitrator's Award in City of Clearwater v. Clearwater Firefighters Association, Inc., IAFF, Local # 1158 [Trevor Murray Dischargel, FMCS Case 05-58832. ACTION: Postponed. Per City Attorney's request, scheduled Attorney-Client session at 9 am on 9/25/06. The City Manager requested direction regarding Mr. Wiser's request for irrigating medians on Countryside Boulevard. ACTION: Consensus not to pursue. 13. Other Council Action Councilmembers reported on events in which they recently participated and reviewed upcoming events. Doran recommended all visit the Francis Wilson Playhouse. Petersen congratulated Highlands of Allen Creek for adding rental units in City. Jonson received info on CVB sales tax and would like more info; congratulated Countryside High and its principal for being named one of 14 highest performing high school principals in FL; acknowledged passing of Liz Lancara; encouraged people to contact City Clerk on how to apply for the interim council seat and to run for his seat. Hibbard noted two new affordable houses in North Greenwood through Mt. Carmel; working with Kennedy, Sandy Lane and King's Highway schools to get magnet program grant; wished Councilmember Hamilton a happy birthday. 14. Adjourn -10:47 p.m. Council Action Agenda 2006-09-21 6 STATE OF FLORIDA S. ST. PETERSBURG TIMES COUNTY OF PINELLAS Published Daily St.Petersburg, Pinellas County, Florida Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Lori Showen who on oath says that she is Legal Clerk of the St. Petersburg Times Clearwater Times a daily newspaper published at St. Petersburg, in Pinellas County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Notice in the matter RE: City.of Clearwater - Notice of Public Hearing EAR ad#1002106142 in the Court was published in said newpaper in the issues of September'11, 2006 Affiant further states the said St. Petersburg Times is a newspaper published at St. Petersburg, in said Pinellas County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in, said Pinellas County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in St. Petersburg, in said Pinellas County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement, and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm, or corporation rany count, rebate., commission or refund for the purpose of securing this ?de -m for lication in the said newpaper. Swto and sub?crlbed before me this 11th day of -Y av M,.. D. Mi "ss;- p ?fi September A.D.2006 Notary Public Personally known or produced identification _ Type of identification produced c, i <2 ±?U -0-111 <iri1 Qn (Seal) Qf, If u, lc ate, Flonda Janice K Ganote ae My Commission D0532333 OF nog Expires 03012010 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy o the original as it appears in the files of the City of Clearwater. Witness my hand and official seal of the City Ada 1 of w. r. 20.21 a uty City Clerk N 'LEGAL:NOTICE . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . - i The City fCouncil?of,the City of Clearwater, Florida, will;;-:;hold a public hearing on Thursday; September .21 2006,.beginning at 6:00 p.m:;`br,as.sbon:thereafter as the matter snap bee,hbard,- ln, Council Chambers, 3rd , floor of City, Hall;1:12 South Osceola Avenue; 'ClearwateG ?PFlorida, to consider -adoptio' 6f the lEvaluatlon 'and -Appraisal Report by Resolution 06 49 Interested parties may appear. And be heard: at,-the hearings or.file,written. notice of approval or obiectioh...with.the City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any,person who decides to appeal: any decision made by City Council," witli respect to any. matter considered at: such .hearing, will need a 'record of the ` proceedings . and, for such: purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim.record of the proceedings is made, which record i.ncludes' the festimony and evidence upon which the appeal'is to be based per 'Florida Statute 286-0105. Cynthia E.,Goudeau, M. City Clerk :City of Clearwater Box 4748'.,,- ' . Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 e. COPY `OF HIS AD IN LARGE PRINT 1S"AVAILABLE IN "OFFICIAL RECORDS.: AND,LEGISLATIVE 'SERVICES, ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY.HEQY1R1NU REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER` TO -PARTICIPATE- IN THIS ;MEETINQ SHOULD CALL--(7271`562-4093! WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater Boards=and City -,Council,.:go..to httpJ/ clearwater.g ra n i cus:coniNiewPublisher.: php?view?Id-11 `and click: on "Resident ' "Engagement Video." You can.also check the informational video out from any Clearwater. public library. Septe ber. 112006` «^ 106142.01; RESOLUTION NO. 06-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ADOPTING THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTES AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 163.3191 Florida Statutes reflects the intent of the state legislature that local planning should be a continuous and ongoing process, and that as part of this process a local government should periodically assess the success or failure of its comprehensive plan to adequately address changing conditions and to ro updates to the plan to reflect changes in state p vide management; and policy on planning and growth .. WHEREAS, based on this assessment, the comprehensive plan may require updating and revision in order to ensure that the plan continues to provide sufficient guidance to the local government regarding land development decisions; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater City Council is required to adopt the Evaluation and Appraisal Report within ninety days from the date of receipt of the proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report by the Clearwater Local Planning Agency; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has prepared and submitted a proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for review prior to adoption; The City of Clearwater has addressed all review comments and concerns by the Department of Community Affairs; the City of Clearwater has satisfactorily responded to and incorporated said comments and concerns made by the Department of Community Affairs, and has included the comments and concerns in the form of an addendum to the Evaluation and Appraisal Report for adoption by the City of Clearwater City Council; and WHEREAS, upon adoption of the Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report the Department of Community Affairs shall conduct a Sufficiency Determination. Appraisal Report as required by Florida Statutes Section 163 and the associated rules listed in the Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the evaluation and appraisal report with the intention of meeting all requirements, contained in the Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code provisions. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. I hereby certify that ft b a true and c in the Mimi of the orrect copy of the original as it appears Witness m hand and ? official e dtof the City o Ci ter. T ' y of QO 410,a - Q4, City Cleric Resolution No. 06-49 PASSED AND ADOPTED this I day of 2006. nk V. Hibbard, Mayor Approved as to form: Leslie K. DougaIII 'Yes Assistant City Atioc ey ATTEST: Cynth' E. Goudeau City C rk Resolution No. 06-49 r? 0 N ,u Nn' 2A J G7 A W cn 1V O RO W .b0? . MIN/RAG n ZJGyF?' ? 1N??NOo WADETRim To: City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Attn: Mrs. Gina Clayton Assistant Planning Director RE: City of Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report We are transmitting 10 copy(s) of the following: Letter of Transmittal WT189-02 If transmitted items are not as noted, notify writer immediately. Date: September 26, 2006 Transmitted By: Regular Mail X Hand Delivered Picked Up By: Other: Certificate for Payment No. Discs Contract Change Order No. Drawings Construction Change Req. No. Field Measure Plans _ Copy of Letter Plans Other: City of Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report Prints Product Literature Samples Shop Drawings For your: Action As Requested Information _ Approval X Distribution Records /Files Remarks: Enclosed are 10 copies of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Job No. CLW2060.01 M (405) By: Jose Fernandez Project Planner cc: David Gildersleeve, Wade Trim P:\CW2060\01 m\Admin-support\Correspondence\LOT_9_26_06.doc Overnight Delivery Specs. _ Tracings Work Orders No. Review/Comment Use Signature • 8745 Henderson Road 813.882.8366 Suite 220, Renaissance 5 888.499.9624 Tampa, FL 33634 813.884.5990 fax www.wadetrim.com • Cwsa / July 21, 2006 \J F 7) "?j?;-liCat c to ' )u ality Service" P.O. BOX %348 U l.hlr_,DiN; rLGrjD.A 4697- 7,±48 (727) 298-3000 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr. Delk: Thank you very much for the opportunity to review the City of Clearwater's Evaluation and Appraisal Report. We found it very well-researched and beautifully organized and presented. The specificity of your recommendations is quite commendable. We find no conflict between Clearwater's EAR and the City of Dunedin's recently prepared EAR. There were, in fact, several common themes, including issues related to build-out conditions, concurrency (particularly for public education facilities), design standards and working waterfronts. Again, thank you for allowing us to review your EAR. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 298-3197. Sin erely, /9/e ry F. Dow Planner II cc: Brenda Winningham, DCA RECEIVED LM2006 MDCLWTREARLT.076 JUL 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT . CITY OF CLEARWATER The City of Dunedin does not discriminate on the bas i> of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, and disabled status in employment or the provision of services" F -3--..+ Tampa 8av egional ?'fanning Council chair vice-Chair Robert A. "Bob" Kersteen JillCoffins Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Scott Back Manny Pumariega July 26, 2006 Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4738 Dear Mr. Delk: Thank you for submitting the City of Clearwater's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for review. • Council staff has reviewed the City of Clearwater's EAR and based on the material presented, it has been determined that the recommendations identified in the EAR are consistent with the Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan. Please do not hesitate to call for more information or clarification concerning this matter. Sincerely, 0 ?j Richard H. Keph Senior Planner cc: Ray Eubanks, DCA `- CEWL 01!"L Z' 20H -P , l.l.l -`,F CITY Or ?:.. ...:... 400o Gatewap Centre Boulevard, Suite i oo • Pinellas Park, FL 337$2 Phone: 727-570-5151 • Fax: 727-570-5118 • State Number: 513-5066 • wwwtbrpc.org r? U FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Sue M.Cobb Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director July 25, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the City of Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Dear Mr. Delk: According to this agency's responsibilities under sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document. Our cursory review indicates that historic resources are not addressed as specific Issues of Local Concern. Nevertheless, historic resources and their protection are addressed under the impacts of redevelopment. The Downtown Redevelopment Master Plan incorporates design guidelines for the historic downtown area and for each character district. Regarding potential problems related to redevelopment, impacts on historical resources and ways of mitigating these impacts are mentioned. The EAR indicates that future amendments to the Comprehensive Plan should address the identification of historical resources that should be preserved and protected during redevelopment activities, and include historic resource concerns during the development review process. The issue of parameters for community character and livable neighborhoods addresses the preservation of historic resources. Based on the EAR, the City of Clearwater has integrated the protection and preservation of historic properties into its redevelopment strategies. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please do not hesitate to contact Susan Harp at (850) 245-6333. Thank you for your interest in protecting Florida's historic resources. Sincerely, Gam. Frederick P. Gaske, Director Xc: Mr. Eubanks, DCA • 500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 O Director's Office O Archaeological Research ? Historic Preservation O Historical Museums (850) 245-6300 • FAX: 245-6436 (850) 245-6444 • FAX: 245-6452 (850) 245-6333 • FAX: 245-6437 (850) 245-6400 • FAX: 245-6433 O Southeast Regional Office O Northeast Regional Office O Central Florida Regional Office (954) 467-4990 • FAX: 467-4991 (904) 825-5045 • FAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 • FAX: 272-2340 • • Southwest Florida .. c Water Management District ? , ? Q1Gj E?M "fie An Equal Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office Opportunity Employer 170 Century Boulevard Suite 226 Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 3600 West Sovereign Path (863) 534-1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 572-6200 SUNCOM 667-3271 Talmadge 0. "Jerry" Rice Chair, Pasco Judith C. Whitehead Vice Chair, Hernando Neil Combee Secretary, Polk Jennifer E. Closshey Treasurer, Hillsborough Edward W. Chance Manatee Thomas & Dabney Sarasota Heidi B. McCree Hillsborough Sallie Parks Pinellas Todd Pressman Pinellas Maritza Rovira-Forino Hillsborough Patsy C. Symons Desoto David L Moore Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel July 12, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 Subject: City of Clearwater Proposed EAR Dear Mr. Delk: In accordance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, the staff of the Southwest Florida Water Management District has reviewed the above-referenced City of Clearwater proposed EAR and offers the following remarks for your consideration: The City is encouraged to continue implementing the new requirements in Chapter 163, F.S., which directs local governments to develop a Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for a ten-year planning period and consider the District's updated Regional Water Supply Plan in future updates of the Comprehensive Plan. The City may wish to use this update as an opportunity to design a process and describe how it will work with other agencies (e.g., the Department of Environmental Protection, the District, Pinellas County) to address Total Maximum Daily Load issues. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this process and we look forward to assisting the City of Clearwater with future efforts. Please contact me at the District's Planning Department at (352) 796-7211, extension 4423 with any questions. Lori H. Belangia Planner Sincerely, ?0 cc: Brenda Winningham, DCA RECEIVED JUL 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARrMEW • CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 . ? ? ? Aw Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH 11201 N. McKinley Drive • Tampa, FL 33612-6456 GOVERNOR Phone (813) 975-6000 • 1-800-226-7220 July 17, 2006 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 DENVER J. STUTLER, JR. M rE23 V f t - JUL { 9 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPME- SERVICES CITY OF CLEAr4WA'rr-' RE: City of Clearwater Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Department has conducted a review of the City of Clearwater proposed EAR regarding the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan (Plan) in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida • Statutes; Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the Department's Review Guidelines for Local Government Comprehensive Plans. Our comments regarding the proposed EAR follow: The EAR indicates on Page 2.5-18 that a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) "could be a viable alternative for Clearwater Beach, Downtown Clearwater, the Clearwater Mall area, and Countryside Mall and US 19." Segments of US 19 within Clearwater are part of a Pinellas County Long Term Concurrency Management (LTCM) Corridor extending from Whitney Road to Klosterman Road. Transportation Policy 1. 1.8 in the Pinellas County Plan includes special policies for US 19 and interim level of service (LOS) standards for that corridor. We recommend that the Clearwater Plan reflect the LTCM corridor status of US 19 and the interim LOS standards for that facility. It should be noted that the segments of US 19 within Clearwater are part of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), our highest priority. We do not support the concept of a TCEA which could negatively impact US 19. The EAR is tentative regarding the updating of Objectives (it says most of them "should be maintained"). We recommend updating Transportation goals, objectives and policies and the map series in order to be consistent with the Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan, and their most recent Level of Service (LOS) Report. In addition to addressing the US 19 LTCM corridor, the City needs to update Objective 8.3 (transportation improvement projects list, 1999-2005) and other Objectives, as appropriate. Section 339.175, Florida Statutes, requires consistency between the comprehensive plan and the plans of the MPO to the maximum extent feasible (see attached Florida Statutes extract). The EAR is required to assess the extent to which changes are needed to develop, in coordination • with other local governments, a common methodology for measuring the impacts on SIS, Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) and Florida Intrastate Highway System facilities for the purpose of implementing the Concurrency Management System (CMS). www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER • Mr. Ray Eubanks July 17, 2006 Page Two The EAR analysis is weak regarding this requirement; it only recognizes the need and the opportunity to enhance coordination and documentation of the LOS analysis and determination of concurrency through working with the MPO. The LOS Report and the methodology for determining LOS is a critical component of the CMS. Therefore, we encourage the local governments in Pinellas County to use an agreed upon uniform methodology accepted by the Department in order to determine the LOS of the aforementioned facilities. The EAR includes Objective 5.1 (page 3.1-17) stating that approvals which would burden service systems above the adopted level will not be granted until the City has assured that adequate services will be available concurrent with the impacts of development. The Plan and Objective 5.1 need revision in order to provide policy guidance regarding proportionate-share contributions from developers who cannot meet concurrency. The City will need to update the Capital Improvements Element to reflect facility improvements that are planned for in the various facilities Elements. The City will also need to demonstrate financial feasibility and ensure consistency with MPO plans. The Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements will need to reflect capacity improvements to State Roads, as well as private funding of facility • improvements under the proportionate fair share option. It should be noted that any mitigation for development impacts to SIS facilities (i.e. US 19) made pursuant to Section 163.3180(16), F.S., requires the concurrency of the Department. The EAR refers to "backlogged facilities." Rule 14-94, Florida Administrative Code, was recently revised and no longer recognizes backlogged facilities. Rule 14-94 includes Statewide Minimum LOS Standards for the State Highway System. The Rule no longer includes a separate LOS standard for backlogged or constrained facilities. The EAR needs to commit to amend the Plan to be consistent with the attached (recently revised) Rule 14-94, F.A.C. The EAR refers to "transportation. fair share mitigation" on page 2.4-22. We recommend referring to transportation proportionate fair share mitigation or proportionate-share contribution, consistent with the requirements of Florida Statutes. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed EAR. If you have any questions, please call me at (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, Carol M. Collins, LGCP and CMS Coordinator • cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT Michael L. Delk, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater • CHAPTER 14-94 STATEWIDE AUNIMUM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS 14-94.001 Purpose. 14-94.002 Definitions. 14-94.003 Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards. 14-94.004 Implementation Schedule. (Repealed) 14-94.001 Purpose. (1) The purpose of this rule chapter is to establish statewide minimum level of service standards to be used in the planning and operation of the State Highway System (SHS), roadway facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIRS), and roadway facilities funded in accordance with Section 339.2819, F.S. which creates the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP). This rule chapter is intended to promote public safety and general welfare, ensure the mobility of people and goods, and preserve the facilities on the SHS, SIS, and facilities funded by the TRIP. The minimum level of service standards for the SIS, FIHS, and facilities funded by the TRIP will be used by the Department in the review of local government comprehensive plans, assessing impacts related to developments of regional impact, and assessing other developments affecting the SIS, FIRS, and roadways funded by the TRIP. The minimum level of service standards for the SIS, FIRS, and roadways funded by the TRIP will be used by local governments for complying with applicable provisions of Section 163.3180, F.S. (2) This rule chapter does not supersede or negate the provisions of Chapter 97-5, F.A.C., pertaining to the preparation and adoption of local comprehensive plans or plan amendments by local governments. Specific Authority 163.3180(10), 344.044(2) FS Law Implemented 163.3180(10), 163.3184(4), 334.03, 334 044(10)(a), (12), (19), 339.155(2), 339 2819, 339.61-.64 FS. History-New 4-14-92, Amended 5-8-06. 14-94.002 Definitions. As used in this rule chapter, the following definitions apply: (1) "Communities" means incorporated places outside urban or urbanized areas, or unincorporated developed areas having a population of 500 or more identified by local governments in their local government comprehensive plans and located outside of • urban or urbanized areas. (2) "Controlled Access. Facilities" means non-limited access arterial facilities where access connections, median openings, and traffic signals are highly regulated. (3) "Exclusive Through Lanes" means roadway lanes exclusively designated for intrastate travel, which are physically separated from general use lanes, and to which access is highly regulated. These lanes may be used for high occupancy vehicles and express buses. during peak hours if the level of service standards can be maintained. (4) "Florida Tnstrastate Highway System OMIS)" means the highway sytem established pursuant to Section 338.001, F.S., which comprises a statewide network of limited and controlled access facilities. The primary function of the system is for high speed and high volume traffic movements within the state. (5) "General Use Lanes" means roadway lanes not exclusively designated for long distance high speed travel. In urbanized areas general use lanes include high occupancy vehicle lanes not physically separated from other travel lanes. (6) "Level of Service (LOS)" for highways means a quantitative stratification ofthe quality of service to a typical traveler on a facility into six letter grade levels with "A" describing the highest quality and "F" describing the lowest quality. The indicated LOS standards designate lowest acceptable operating conditions for the 100th highest volume hour of the year in the predominant traffic flow direction. The 100th highest volume hour represents the typical peak hour during the peak season. Definitions and measurement criteria used for minimum LOS standards are based on the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2000. All LOS evaluations are to be based on the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2000, the Department's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, or a methodology determined by the Department to be of comparable reliability. The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2000 and the Department's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of these rules. The National Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual 2000, is available from the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. The Department's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook may be found at: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/ systems/sm/los/los_sw2.htm. (7) "Limited Access Facilities" means multilane divided highways having a minimum of two lanes for exclusive use of traffic in each direction and full control of ingress and egress; this includes freeways and all fully controlled access roadways. (8) "Other State Roads" means roads on the SHS which are not part of the FIRS. (9) "Peak Hour" means the 100th highest volume hour of the year in the predominant traffic flow direction from the present through a 20 year planning horizon. (10) "Multimodal Transportation Districts (1v MTDs)" means areas in which secondary priority is given to vehicle mobility and Wm rim ary priority is given to assuring a safe, comfortable and attractive pedestrian environment with convenient interconnection to sit. Local government comprehensive plans may establish multimodal LOS standards within MMTDs pursuant to Section 1.63-3180(15), FS. - 255 • (11) "Regionally Significant Roadways" means as established pursuant to Section 3-39.2819 F.S. (12) "Roadways Parallel to Exclusive Transit Facilities" means roads that generally run parallel to and within one-half mile of exclusive transit facilities, which are physically separated rail or roadway lanes reserved for multipassenger use by rail cars or buses serving large volumes of home/work trips during peak travel hours. Exclusive transit facilities do not include downtown people-movers,-or high occupancy vehicle lanes unless physically separated from other travel lanes. (13) "Rural Areas" means areas not included in an urbanized area, a transitioning urbanized area, an urban area, or a community. (14) "Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)" means as established pursuant to Sections 339.61-.64, F_S. (15) "SIS Connectors" means designated roadways that connect SIS hubs to SIS highways. These may be either on or off the SHS. (16) "SIS Hubs" means ports and terminals that move goods or people between Florida regions or between Florida and other markets in the United States and the rest of the world. These include commercial, service airports, deepwater seaports, space ports, interregional rail and bus terminals, and freight rail terminals. (17) "Transitioning Urbanized Areas" means the areas outside urbanized areas, but within the MVO Metropolitan Planning Area Boundaries, that are expected to be included within the urbanized areas within the next 20 years based primarily on the U.S. Bureau of Census urbanized criteria. (18) "Transportation Concun-ency Exception Area (TCEA)" means an area which is so designated by a local government pursuant to Section 163.3 180, F.S. (19) "Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA)" means a geographically compact area with an existing network of roads where multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes are available for common trips. A TCMA may be designated in local government comprehensive plans in accordance with Section 163.3180, F.S. (20) "Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP)" means as established pursuant to Section 339.2819, F.S. (21) "Urban Areas" means places with a population of at least 5,000 which are not included in urbanized areas based on the most recent U.S: Census. The applicable boundary encompasses the urban area as well as the surrounding geographical area as determined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Department, and local government. The boundaries are commonly called FHWA Urban Area Boundaries and include areas expected to have medium density development before the next decennial census. • (22) "Urbanized Areas" means the urbanized areas designated by the U.S. Bureau of 'Census as well as the surrounding geographical areas, as determined by the FHWA, the Department, and the Metropolitan Planning Organization; and are commonly called FHWA Urbanized Area Boundaries. The over or under 500,000 classifications distinguish urbanized area populations based on the most recent U.S. Census. Speck Authority 163.3180(10), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 163.3180(10), 163.3184(4), 334.03, 334.044(10)(a), (12), (19), 339.155(2), 339.2819, 339:61-.64 FS. History-New 4-14-92; Amended 5-8-06 14-94.003 Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards. (1) The Statewide Minimum LOS Standards are as follows: 0 MMTDs2 STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM (SIS), ROADWAYS ON THE FLORIDA INTRASTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM (FIRS) AND ROADWAY FACILdTIES FUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 339.2819, FLORIDA STATUTES, THE TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM (TRIP) ROADS3 Limited ccess Highway4 (Freeway) Controlled Access Highway4 Other Multilane4 wo- e Rural Areas BT- B C rani ornng r e Areas, Urban Areas, or Communities r anrze Areas Under 500;000 r aruze as ver 500;000 Roadways Parallel to Exclusive Transit Facilities 1 e s D(E) E" -- -- Inside TCEAs- and -- __ - 256 i ...?...? ?x palcuuic?ins appty to general use lanes only when exclusive through lanes exist. 1. For rural two-lane facilities, the standard is C. 2. Means the Department must be consulted as provided by Section 163.3180(5), (7), or (15), Florida Statutes, regarding level of service standards set on SIS or TRIP facilities impacted by TCMAs, MMTDs, or TCEAs respectively. 3. Means the level of service standards for non TRIP facilities maybe set by local governments in accordance with Rule 9J-5.0055, F.A.C_ 4. It is recognized that certain roadways (i.e., constrained roadways) will not be expanded by the addition of through lanes for physical, environmental, or policy reasons. In such instances, a variance to the level of service may be sought pursuant to Section 120.542, Florida Statutes. NOTE: Level of service letter designations are defined in the Department's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. (2) Specific assumptions and restrictions that apply to these minimum LOS standards are: (a) The minimum LOS standards represent the lowest acceptable operating conditions in the peak hour. (b) Definitions and measurement criteria used for the minimum LOS standards can be found in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 2000. (c) When calculating or evaluating level of service pursuant to this rule, all calculations and evaluations shall be based on the methodology contained in Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 2000, the Department's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, or a methodology determined by the Department to be of comparable reliability. Any methodology superseded by the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, such as a methodology based on the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual or Circular 212, shall not be used. (3) Minimum LOS Standards for SIS Connectors and TRIP Funded Facilities are: (a) Minimum LOS Standards for SIS Highways. 1. Limited access SIS highways shall adhere to the limited access FIHS LOS standards. 2_ Controlled access SIS highways shall adhere to the controlled access FIRS LOS standards. 3. These standards shall apply•regardless whether the facility is FIHS, SHS, or under other jurisdiction. (b) Minimum LOS Standards for SIS Connectors. The minimum LOS standard for SIS connectors shall be LOS D. (c) Minimum LOS Standards for Regionally Significant Roadways Funded by the TRIP. 1. Regionally significant roadways utilizing TRIP funding shall adhere to the Other State Roads Standards in Chapter 14-94, F.A.C. 2. These LOS standards apply to the TRIP funded portions of the roadways facilities extending to their logical termini for LOS analysis. Specific Authority 163.3180(10), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 163.3180(10), 163.3184(4), 334.03, 334.044(10)(a), (12), (19), 339155(2), 339.2819, 339.61-:64 FS History-New 4-14-92, Amended 5-8-06 - 257 0 Extract from Section 339.175, Florida Statutes. 339.175 Metropolitan planning organization (4) AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY.--The authority and responsibility of an M.P.O. is to manage a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that, based upon the prevailing principles provided in s. 334.046(1), results in the development of plans and programs which are consistent, to the maximum extent feasible with the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government the boundaries of which are within the metropolitan area of the M.P.O. An M.P.O. shall be the forum for cooperative decisionmaking by officials of the affected governmental entities in the development of the plans and programs required by subsections (5), (6), (7), and (8). (6) LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN.--Each M.P.O. must develop a long-range transportation plan that addresses at least a 20-year planning horizon. The plan must include both long-range and short-range strategies and must comply with all other state and federal requirements. The prevailing principles to be considered in the long-range transportation plan are: preserving the existing transportation infrastructure; enhancing Florida's economic competitiveness; and improving travel choices to ensure mobility. The long-range transportation plan must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible with future land use elements and the goals objectives and policies of the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government located within the jurisdiction of the M.P.O. The approved long-range transportation plan must be considered by local governments in the development of the transportation elements in local government comprehensive plans and any amendments thereto. The long-range transportation plan must, at a minimum (skip next section): (7)(c) The transportation improvement program must, at a minimum: 1. Include projects and project phases to be funded with state or federal funds within the time period of the transportation improvement program and which are recommended for advancement during the next fiscal year and 4 subsequent fiscal years. Such projects and . project phases must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible with the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government located within the jurisdiction of the M.P.O. For informational purposes, the transportation improvement program shall also include a list of projects to be funded from local or private revenues. (g) The Department of Community Affairs shall review the annual transportation improvement program of each M.P.O. for consistency with the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government whose boundaries are within the metropolitan area of each M.P.O. and shall identify those projects that are inconsistent with such comprehensive plans. The Department of Community Affairs shall notify an M.P.O. of any transportation projects contained in its transportation improvement program which are inconsistent with the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government whose boundaries are within the metropolitan area of the M.P.O. 0 ./ • LJ RESOLUTION NO. 06-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ADOPTING THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTES AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 163.3191 Florida Statutes reflects the intent of the state legislature that local planning should be a continuous and ongoing process, and that as part of this process a local government should periodically assess the success or failure of its comprehensive plan to adequately address changing conditions and to provide updates to the plan to reflect changes in state policy on planning and growth management; and . WHEREAS, based on this assessment, the comprehensive plan may require updating and revision in order to ensure that the plan continues to provide sufficient guidance to the local government regarding land development decisions; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater City Council is required to adopt the Evaluation and Appraisal Report within ninety days from the date of receipt of the proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report by the Clearwater Local Planning Agency; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has prepared and submitted a proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for review prior to adoption; The City of Clearwater has addressed all review comments and concerns by the Department of Community Affairs; the City of Clearwater has satisfactorily responded to and incorporated said comments and concerns made by the Department of Community Affairs, and has included the comments and concerns in the form of an addendum to the Evaluation and Appraisal Report for adoption by the City of Clearwater City Council; and WHEREAS, upon adoption of the Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report the Department of Community Affairs shall conduct a Sufficiency Determination. Appraisal Report as required by Florida Statutes Section 163 and the associated rules listed in the Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: • Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the evaluation and appraisal report with the intention of meeting all requirements. contained in the Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code provisions. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of the original as it appears in the filea of the city of Clearwater. Witness nry hand and official seal of TN"&Pq - the City Clof=er+205 Resolution No. 06-49 City Clerk • 2006PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ?- . Approved as to form: w, Leslie K. 4Dougall-* es Assistant City Atio ey nk V. Hibbard, Mayor ATTEST: Cynth' E. Goudeau city C rk? Resolution No. 06-49 APR 1 8 2006 ?E?af-?...,= k .: _F4?- STATE OF FLORIDA DEPART4MENT O.F COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "' ' "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH THADDEUS L,.COHEN, AIA Govemor Secretary RECEIVED April 13, 2006 APR 18 2007 PLANNING DEPARTNW CITY OF CLEARWAM The Honorable Frank Hibbard Mayor, City of Clearwater Office of the City Council P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Hibbard, The Department of Community Affairs has reviewed your letter of March 16, 2006, • which outlines the scope of work for the preparation of the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The Department agrees with the summary of the issues as set forth in the attached document: 1 _ ' The City should be aware of newly enacted legislation (Florida Senate Bill 360, now codified as Chapter 2005-290, Laws of Florida) amending Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, including the EAR requirements. As of July 1, 2005, all evaluation and appraisal reports must address, as applicable, two new evaluation topics: Section 163.3191(2)(o), F.S., relating to concurrency exception areas, concurrency management areas, and multimodal transportation districts; and r ecton 691pp?; F. relating to_the-irnplementat3on of=tl? o egt s concurrency management syste "The newlegislat-ion-alsar_ey.is he E vith existing_p-ublic_scho_ols an Section-1.6 19 `(2)1?; F. requiring an evaluation of the success of the local government in identifying and implementing alternative and traditional water supply projects necessary to meet the local government's water supply needs. In addition, Florida House Bill 955, now codified as Chapter 2005-157, Laws of Florida, revised the requirements of Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, to require comprehensive plans to include waterways in the comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation and to include in the Coastal Management Element shoreline component management strategies that will be used to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts defined in Section 0 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD $ TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: httD://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shurrard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 ___ ___ _._- ,.,??.... 1- __nw_ooao 6A5014M7956 Mayor Frank Hibbard IS Page 2 of 2 April 13, 2006 3421.07, F.S. The EAR should include an evaluation of the City's Plan in relation to these issues and include recommendation for updating the Plan in the EAR-based amendments to address the new requirements. The EAR process is an essential component of comprehensive planning for local governments in Florida. The Department wishes to encourage your efforts in carrying out this important evaluation and review process. If you or your staff have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact me at (850)922-1800. Sincerely, lf'-z I ? Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator BW/ed • Enclosure cc: Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Brian Smith, AICP, Director, Pinellas County Planning Department Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director, City of Clearwater • • STATE OF FLORIDA DE`PAR°TMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Govemor September 17, 200' • Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 SEP 2 0 2007 PLANNING & DEVELOPMi N7 CITY OF Ci.EAR'NA7ER RE: Clearwater Evaluation and Appraisal Report Extension Dear Mr. Delk: . This is in response to your letter dated September 13, 2007, requesting a six-month extension for the adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The Department may grant the extension for the adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report based amendments, if the request is justified by good and sufficient cause pursuant to Section 163.3191(10), Florida Statutes. The Department has reviewed your request and accepts the reasons as sufficient cause and grants the City of Clearwater the extension. Please submit the EAR-based amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Community Planning, Plan Processing Team by November 29, 2008. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 487-4545. Sincerely J?? C Mike McDaniel Chief of Comprehensive Planning cc: Jessica White, Principal Planner Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 2656 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: httP://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon. FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 C PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 13, 2007 C ITY OF C LEARIATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Brenda Winningham Regional Planning Administrator State of Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: Request for Extension of Time Dear Ms. Winningham: Please accept this as the City of Clearwater's official request for an extension of time for completion of changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan as required by our Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Following the finding of Sufficiency for our EAR on November 29, 2006, we commenced work on the comprehensive plan update. It was and remains our intention to perform this work in- house. To date, our Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) has reviewed two of five issues of local concern as identified in the EAR. Due to the size and complexity of the task of completing this work, additional time will be necessary. Therefore, the City of Clearwater respectfully requests approval of a six-month extension as per 163.3191(10) F.S. for adoption of EAR-based amendments. This would establish November 29, 2008 rather than May 29, 2008 as our deadline for concluding the update. Sandra Herman of our staff is the lead planner on this project. If there are any questions with regard to this request, please do not hesitate to contact her at (727) 562-4586. Sincerely, Michael DeI? Planning Director FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • v ? 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 24, 2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 MR. MIKE MCDANIEL, CHIEF OFFICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 Re: Financial Feasibility of Capital Improvements Schedule • Dear Mr. McDaniel: Thank you for your letter of April 16, 2007 responding to our alternate methodology to the FIAM. In that letter you made several qualifying statements to which we wish to respond. We propose to support our 5-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements by identifying level. of services deficiencies and projected needs based upon the City's adopted LOS for transportation, sewer, water and parks and recreation facilities. No additional LOS deficiencies are anticipated in the future due to Clearwater's unique position of being approximately 97% built-out. Because of the built-out status, it is unlikely that future infill or redevelopment will significantly degrade the level of service in any of these categories. We are including a copy of our most recent Capital Improvements Program(CIP). Of course, the schedule of improvements includes the project description, committed and expected funding. As indicated previously, our intention is to reference the CIP in the Capital Improvements Element. Please advise as to whether the method for identifying is FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 4F level of service deficiencies, projected needs and projects to meet these needs and reduce these deficiencies (if any) as indicated therein, meet with your approval. Thank you. Yours truly, Catherine W. Porter, AICP Long Range Planning Manager 0 cc: Michael Delk, Planning Director Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director cwP? l_.I -FIVER NMI PILANNING DEPARTMENT CITE' OF CLEARWATER STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST THOMAS G. PELHAM Governor Secretary April 16, 2007 Ms. Catherine W. Porter, AICP Long Range Planning Manager The City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Ms. Porter: This letter is response to your letter of March 1, 2007 indicating that you have concerns about using the Fiscal Impact Assessment Model (FIRM) model to demonstrate financial feasibility. You propose instead, to use a balance sheet approach to satisfy the requirements of Section 163.3177(2), Florida Statutes (F.S.) for demonstrating financial feasibility of the Capital Improvements Schedule Local governments are not required to use the FIAM model to verify financial feasibility. The use of a balance sheet or spreadsheet format can be used to n / emonstrate financial feasibility. However, please note that the City's Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements and supporting requirements must meet the requirements of Section 163.3177(2) F.S. n. u ( ), ®1 d 3 ( T c updated Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements should be supported by an analysis identifying the existing level of service deficiencies and projected needs based on . growth over the five-year planning timeframe. The City should identify the capital improvements needed to reduce existing deficiencies, and to meet the needs of growth to ensure that the adopted level of service standards are achieved and maintained over the Five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The schedule should clearly identify capital improvements projects, for example, for road improvements the project description should identify the type of project, such as "road widening," as well as the name of the road and the segment to be widened. The data and analysis should demonstrate that the funding is committed for the first three years, and planned or committed for years four and five, to fund the projected cost of the capital improvement. In the event that the planned revenue sources are not approved, 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX.: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl. LIS CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 3 2 3 99-2 1 00 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305' 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 0 Ms Catherine Porter, AICP April 16, 2007 Page 2 the schedule should identify alternate committed revenue sources to replace the revenue sources that require referenda or other actions to secure them. Developer funded projects need to be supported with a developer's agreement that is part of the data and analysis supporting the Five- year Schedule of Capital Improvements. We appreciate the City's efforts to work with the Department to clarify and understand the financial feasibility requirements of Chapter 163, F.S. We are available to work with you to provide any further assistance needed in the preparation of the City's Capital Improvements Plan Update. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Dan Evans, AICP, Senior Planner, at (850) 922-1805. Sincerely, Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning MM/de cc: Manny Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ¦ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ronnie E. Duncan - Chairman Robert B. Stewart - Vice Chairman Calvin D. Harris Susan Latvala John Morroni Karen Williams Seel Kenneth T. Welch April 26, 2007 Michael Delk, Director of Planning City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Subject: 10 Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Dear -perk: Pinellas U County PLANNING As you are aware, the City of Clearwater is included within the Pinellas County Water Demand Planning Area (PCWDPA) and is a wholesale customer of Pinellas County Utilities. In mid to late May, the Pinellas County Planning Department will have compiled a packet of information, including a letter of assurance that Pinellas County Utilities plans for, and provides, the facilities necessary to transmit and distribute potable water within the Pinellas County Water Demand Planning Area, including to your jurisdiction. In addition, since Tampa Bay Water is the potable water supplier to the Pinellas County Utility System, we will be obtaining similar assurance from them to distribute to our wholesale customers. Pinellas County is also in' the process of updating its 10 Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and will provide this information along with the letter of assurance. The 10 Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan will also consider the findings of the SWFWMD Regional Water Supply Plan, particularly with regard to reclaimed water and water conservation commitments. It is our intention that the letter and packet of other information we will be sending you in May will satisfy the Department of Community Affairs that Pinellas County is planning for the long- term wholesale water needs of the City of Clearwater, and that the required coordination has occurred between the Countv and the City, as well as the County and Tampa Bay Water, and Tampa Bay Water and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Please contact Liz Freeman or Robert Feigel of my planning staff at 464-8200, if you need additional information, or have any questions. Sincerely, Smith, Director of Planning County Planning Department RECEIVED ` r q 2 7 2007 i;-LANNING DEPARRAW CITY OF CLEARWATER PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: 600 Cleveland Street Suite 750 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Phone: (727) 464-8200 Fax: (727) 464-8201 Website: www.pinellascounty.org r i t"J omh? yv-_- 6(,I? (/