08/25/2010
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
August 25, 2010
Present: Douglas J. Williams Chair
Michael Boutzoukas Vice Chair – departed at 4:32 p.m.
Phillip J. Locke Board Member
Donald Van Weezel Board Member
Richard Avichouser Board Member
James E. Strickland Board Member
Absent: Sheila Cole Board Member
Also Present: Caitlin E. Sirico Attorney for the Board
Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney
Rosemarie Call Secretary for the Board
Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
The Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final
administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas
County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0109 requires any
party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings.
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.1 Case 31-10
Church of Hope & Faith
Michael William & Assoc. Inc.
307 Leeward Island
Exterior Surfaces, Dev. Code Violations, IENCOD – Franco
Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto said the City had withdrawn the violation related to
parking.
Iris Puskas said she is part owner of the corporation that owns the property and director
of the Church of Hope & Faith. She said divorce proceedings are underway with her husband,
who lives on the property.
Inspector Peggy Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were
issued on May 27 and July 13, 2010, following the first inspection. Violations at 307 Leeward
Island relate to exterior surfaces, bedrooms rented to individuals, and the dock advertised for
rental. Property photographs on May 25, June 7, July 7, 9, 13, and 21, and August 5 and 12,
2010 showed exterior surfaces with bare and decayed wood, tar paper, rust, and discolored
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 1
paint, air-conditioning units in four bedroom windows, and 12 different vehicles parked in front of
the house. Online advertisements dated July 19 and August 24, 2010 offered the property’s
boat lift and a private bedroom for rent.
Police Officer Kimberly Kilian testified she responded to a call at the subject property on
June 22, 2010 and received a tenant’s permission to take interior photographs, which showed a
refrigerator in a bedroom, a lock on a bedroom door, and four signs in common areas listing
house rules. She saw individual locks on every door and reconfigured bathrooms. Neighbors
have complained about this property. The tenant indicated more than 12 bedrooms were
available for rent.
Inspector Franco said no building permits had been issued for this property. She was
unaware of any life safety issues.
Ms. Puskas said she is willing to take back ownership of the property but cannot visit it
due to an injunction. She expressed a willingness to help the City.
Member Van Weezel moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector Franco recommended compliance by September 1, 2010 or a fine of $100 per
day per violation be imposed.
Attorney Soto requested that the Board’s order provide the City the ability to enter the
property to check compliance. He submitted composite exhibits.
Member Boutzoukas moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the
violations on or before September 1, 2010. If the Respondent does not comply within the time
specified, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per day per violation for each day each
violation continues to exist and the Board authorizes the City to enter the premises to inspect it
for the purpose of determining if violations related to individual room rentals continue to exist.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on August 25,
2010, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that exterior surfaces
have discolored paint or are bare, with decayed wood, boarded windows, exposed tar paper,
and rust, that separate bedrooms are rented to individuals, and that the home’s boat dock has
been advertised for rental. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 2
1-104.B,
The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s)
2-1602, and 3-1502.B
, as referred in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by September 1, 2010 and that the Board authorizes the City to
enter the premises to inspect it for the purpose of determining if violations related to individual
room rentals continue to exist. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified,
the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per day per violation for each day each violation
continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall
notify Inspector Peggy Franco, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of
compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of
the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida,
and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s),
pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 25th day of August 2010, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
2.2 Case 32-10
Gary & Christine Queen
3333 Wind Chime Drive W
Hauling Trailer – Schaar
No one was present to represent the owners.
Inspector Shelby Schaar provided a PowerPoint presentation. The 2009 violations were
corrected last year. She had multiple phone calls in June and July 2010 with the property’s
owner and tenant following notification that the hauling trailers had been returned to the
property. A notice of violation was issued on June 28, 2010. Violations at 3333 Wind Chime
Drive W relate to hauling trailers parked in the street and driveway. Property photographs on
June 9 and 30, July 25, and August 1, 2010 showed hauling trailers parked in the driveway
between the residence and the right-of-way. A July 19, 2010 photograph showed two hauling
trailers parked in the street in front of the property. The property now is in compliance; the
tenant has vacated the premises.
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 3
Member Avichouser moved to find that the Respondent(s) was in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector Schaar said the City would have recommended a daily fine of $100 had the
violation not been corrected. She requested a declaration of violation.
Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Locke moved to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the
Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per
day for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat
violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on August 25,
2010, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed;
however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. The
Respondent(s) was/were not present.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-
The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s)
1407.A.1.b and 3-1407.A.2.b
, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The
Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein, the
Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine of $100.00 for each day the violation exists
after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the
Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 4
DONE AND ORDERED
this 25th day of August 2010, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
2.3 Case 33-10
Robin E. Chappell
1370 Admiral Woodson Lane
Minimum Bldg & Fire Code Requirement, Exterior Surfaces, Yard – O’Neil
Property owner Robin Chappell said she is also known as Robin Vanhook; she did not
admit to the violations.
Inspector Corey O’Neil provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was
issued on October 26, 2009, following the first inspection. Violations at 1370 Admiral Woodson
Lane relate to shingles hanging off the roof, missing soffit, and debris in the yard. Property
photographs on October 23, December 1, 2009 and February 8, March 19, July 9, and August
23, 2010 showed a sheet of shingles hanging off the roof, debris, a dismantled shed, and tree
limbs in the rear yard, and missing soffit. Attorney Soto said Ms. Chappell’s September 2009,
letter acknowledged the damage to her home and yard. While staff worked with her, little
progress has occurred.
Ms. Chappell said a tree limb fell on the back of her house and destroyed her shed. She
said physical and financial problems have prevented her from cleaning the yard and completing
repairs to the roof and soffit. She said the shed and tree branches have been removed from the
yard; debris from the shed remains.
Member Van Weezel moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector O’Neil recommended compliance by September 24, 2010 or a fine of $100 per
day per violation be imposed.
Ms. Chappell said she did not have sufficient funds to pay a roofer to finish the work.
She submitted copies of her recent hospital bill and a doctor’s letter stating she is unable to
perform any lawn work. She requested time and leniency, stating her medical problems could
continue for years.
Discussion ensued regarding the owner’s circumstances. It was suggested she request
help from friends or a non-profit agency. Concern was expressed that vermin access to the
house through missing soffit could cause her additional health problems.
Ms. Chappell said she could establish a schedule for repairs and show progress in 60
days. She said she no longer could afford the attorney she referenced in previous
correspondence.
Attorney Soto said the City has shown an abundance of leniency since last year and
requested that the Board order compliance within 45 days. He submitted composite exhibits.
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 5
Member Boutzoukas moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the
violation on or before October 14, 2010. If the Respondent does not comply within the time
specified, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per day per violation for each day violations
continue to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on August 25,
2010, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that roof shingles hang off
the roof, soffit is missing, and debris is in the yard. The Respondent(s) was/were present.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-
The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s)
1502.A, 3-1502.B, and 3-1502.H.5
, as referred in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by October 14, 2010. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within
the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per day per violation for each day
each violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the
Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Corey O’Neil, who shall inspect the property and notify the
Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a
certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by
the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 25th day of August 2010, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 6
2.4 Case 34-10
Belleview Biltmore Owner LLC
1590 Gulf Boulevard
Exterior Surfaces, Door & Window Openings, Windows, Roof Maintenance – Franco
Martin Smith, representative for Belleview Biltmore Owner LLC, admitted to the violation,
indicating that repairs were 70% complete.
Member Avichouser moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector Franco recommended compliance by September 25, 2010 or a fine of $200
per day per violation be imposed. Attorney Soto reported five violations were cited.
Mr. Smith said staff had replaced glass on windows and doors, patched and repainted
concrete, and painted rust spots. He said staff can make all repairs. He said the lattice will be
reinstalled below the pool, which is covered. He said the building is closed and is not a
construction site. He said development plans for the site have been delayed due to the financial
market. He said repairs could be completed by September 25, 2010.
Six residents spoke in support of enforcing City Code and ordering maximum fines.
It was requested that staff present photographs of the site.
Inspector Franco reviewed photographs of the property dated June 29, July 21, and
August 12, 2010, which showed decayed wood columns, mold and mildew on exterior surfaces,
rusted pipes, disintegrating and cracked concrete with exposed rusting rebar, boarded windows
and doors, damaged and rusted soffits and eaves, unsecured windows, and a sharp rusted
edge on a steel girder that attaches two buildings.
Planning and Development Director Michael Delk said staff visits the site weekly
regarding unsafe building issues. The City supports razing the structure. Attorney Soto
submitted composite exhibits.
Member Van Weezel moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the
violations on or before September 25, 2010. If the Respondent does not comply within the time
specified, the Board may order a fine of $250.00 per day per violation for each day violations
continue to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on August 25,
2010, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that exterior surfaces
have decayed wood columns and disintegrating and cracked concrete with exposed rusting
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 7
rebar, windows and doors are boarded, soffits and eaves are damaged and rusted, the steel
girder attaching the two buildings has a sharp rusted edge, and windows are not secured. A
representative of the Respondent(s) was present.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-
The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s)
1502.B, 3-1502.C.1, 3-1502.C.3, 3-1502.C.4, and 3-1502.D
, as referred in the Affidavit in this
case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by September 25, 2010. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply
within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $250.00 per day per violation for each
day each violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the
Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Peggy Franco, who shall inspect the property and notify the
Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a
certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by
the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 25th day of August 2010, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
2.5 Case 35-10
Richard J. Lewis
953 Mandalay Avenue
Residential Grass Parking – Franco
No one was present to represent the owner.
Inspector Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued
on February 9, 2010, following the first inspection. Violations at 953 Mandalay Avenue relate to
parking on the grass. Property photographs on February 9 and 19, April 22, June 7, July 13, 18,
and 25, and August 12, 2010 showed vehicles and a boat and trailer parked on the property’s
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 8
front lawn. A neighbor has reported that the property owner had family in town but now is aware
of the Code. The neighbor said the property now complies with Code.
Member Van Weezel moved to find that the Respondent(s) was in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector Franco said the City would have recommended a daily fine of $100 if the
violation had not been corrected. She requested a declaration of violation.
Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Avichouser moved to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the
Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per
day for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat
violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on August 25,
2010, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed;
however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. The
Respondent(s) was/were not present.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-
The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s)
1407.A.4,
as referred to in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The
Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein, the
Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine of $100.00 for each day the violation exists
after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the
Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 9
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 25th day of August 2010, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
2.6 Case 36-10
Halina Kelemen
713 Bruce Avenue
Living in Vehicle, RV Parking - Franco
No one was present to represent the owner.
Inspector Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued
on February 23 and June 14, 2010, following inspections. Violations at 713 Bruce Avenue
relate to a RV (Recreational Vehicle) parked in the driveway. Property photographs on
February 11, May 30, June 7, and July 7, 2010 showed a RV, registered in Texas, parked in the
property’s driveway with an electrical cord running into the house. The RV was not present
between February 24 and May 2010. Inspector Franco said it appeared that people were living
in the vehicle. Realtor Eric Grabber reported that the violation has been corrected; the tenants
have vacated the premises.
Member Van Weezel moved to find that the Respondent(s) was in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector Franco said the City would have recommended a daily fine of $100 if the
violation had not been corrected. She requested a declaration of violation.
Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Locke moved to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the
Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per
day for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat
violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on August 25,
2010, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed;
however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. The
Respondent(s) was/were not present.
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 10
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
-
The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s)
916.A and 3-1407.A.2.c,
as referred to in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The
Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein, the
Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine of $100.00 for each day the violation exists
after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the
Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 25th day of August 2010, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
3.1 Case 19-10 – Affidavit of Compliance
Richard & Joann Coley
15 Somerset Street #603
Overnight Accommodations - Franco
3.2 Case 28-10 – Affidavit of Non-Compliance
Scott R. Parker
3266 Sandy Ridge Road
Public Health Safety Nuisance – Schaar
Member Avichouser moved to accept the Affidavit of Compliance for Case 19-10 and to
accept the Affidavit of Non-Compliance and issue the Order imposing fines for Case 28-10. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
4. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS:
Arben Hajro PNU2009-02856
224 S Hillcrest Avenue
15-29-15-88992-004-0080 $454.10
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 11
Timonty T. Garson PNU2010-00435
1231 Palm Street
03-29-15-15840-002-0130 $375.20
Discount Properties of Florida PNU2010-00542
1523 Tioga Avenue
22-29-15-13680-000-0210 $355.70
Jason Stewart PNU2010-00584
1705 Thomas Drive
05-29-16-94356-004-0280 $777.40
Selim Ozunal PNU2010-00623
424 Midway Island
08-29-15-43344-000-0630 $771.28
American Infoage PNU2010-00626
505 Virginia Avenue
13-29-15-00000-320-0500 $579.50
GFB Development LLC PNU2010-00706
143 Island Way
08-29-15-43326-000-0050 $597.80
GFB Development LLC PNU2010-00729
125 Island Way 2
08-29-15-43326-000-0040 $597.80
Rafal Maciag PNU2010-00810
2306 Nash Street
18-29-16-34596-000-2110 $332.00
30 Days Real Estate Corp PNU2010-00862
1140 Palm Bluff Street
10-29-15-33552-006-0520 $382.04
Chuck C. Broadhurst PNU2010-00863
1112 Palm Bluff Street
10-29-15-33552-006-0390 $310.52
Thomas J. Utesch PNU2010-00875
808 S Duncan Avenue
14-29-15-62028-001-0030 $683.00
Joseph W. Webb PNU2010-00889
2422 Hillcreek Circle
32-28-16-18626-003-0180 $485.84
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 12
Eddie McCants Est.
1126 LaSalle Street
10-29-15-33552-005-0460
Joshua Sams
425 Midway Island
08-29-15-43344-000-0560
THE C®/?
Member Locke moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 28, 2010
Member Avichouser moved to approve the minutes of the regular Municipal Code
Enforcement Board meeting of July 28, 2010, as submitted in written summation to each board
member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
6. ADJOURN:
The meeting adjourned at 4:44 p.m.
Attest:
Secretary to the Board
PNU2010-00908
$346.04
PNU2010-02623
$389.96
C Ka- ir
Muni ipal Code Enforcement Board
CLOO
??A+EI/R1Vrc ?
Code Enforcement 2010-08-25 13