Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLS2002-08063
S a+? dearwater ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL V ' Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue i 1 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 All 2002 _I L %ND NOTARIZED APPLICATION `. ?. mar= CLLt 3 ? SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 72, DATE RECEIVED: _ - RECEIVED BY (staff inl ials : ATLAS PAGE #: Z(67A ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROP TIES: ff NORTH: "/ SOUTH: WEST: EAST: FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLISAR46IN? (Revised 8/10/01) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT, use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANTNAME: O T &AC1L 5TEAr- 1iauSE OF it10A., ..LMC- . MAILING ADDRESS: zz.O z N W&ziTsNo ..00 S-Fh t'c.c5e5 2G & 2 lAM ?Ai 1't:. 33607 E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: BIB- ZS L 17-Z.: 5 CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: F01A - Z 8 Z - 9 ! 4 1 PROPERTY OWNER(S): R.-S. E Tnic- . / CC- iw AS A tv %ST R So P o g (.E S), f boo GU?•-r at-VQ (Must include ALL owners) = Pia - t C,?a zWAT6iZ? t c.. 33767 AGENT NAME(S): ?A M i E ?yT t_E 2 C?O C?c?T ?AGIC S! E6iiLHC] V sc 1?3? \ 7aocl?+ MAILING ADDRESS: 77-c--5 7- WESTSt 1y RE bL.V 0 SS: h r-LO oi2- 1 AM ?A , FL. 336,07 E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 82. - 12- 2. J CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: ?S 1 3 - 2.6?-- 9 (9J, B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 14 SA MAKOA+`AY Ave- C?EA Ji4TE:S2 , L.. 33767 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE A T 7ACN E D (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal? PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: 7yU { ; ! G`I (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Lx! STI A (m Z STORY MOL-TI - (> SE '11402PJ N G cENTG ?2 (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of n se) DESCRIPTIONOFREQUEST(S): CODE ?PMVc.1r4Co iREQVCT/Qr4l PATio DiNil4CL7 4 (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSL P' O D P fl t 'I'lIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, tt?o-rc(bpy oPthe?a-6pflZta6le' documents) %?' 1 Page 1 of 5 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) C3/SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) rITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. (kl. 41) 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Sm, .1, 6?,, 42,) 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ,2d ® Address all applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary: J NICKOLas C. 791 Bayway Blvd. EKONOMI DES Clearwater Florida 33767-2610 727.447.1075 Nickolas C. Ekonomides Attorney at Law 727.447.1035 Fax Nick@Eko-Law.com www.Eko-Law.com Real Estate Law - Title Insurance - Immigration - Corporate . Page 2 of 5 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) AND SEALED SURVEY (including dimensions of property) - One original and 12 copies; q, COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; o, LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O,> JUA9`' TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Q All dimensions; 9 North arrow; 1 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; 32 All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; D Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; rjmcfs?,?S Depictions by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscape are` as; Location of all refuse collection facilities and enclosures (minimum 12'x10' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units and PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces., total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Q Size and species of all landscape material; C Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Q Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; . Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Page 3 of 5 -Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMMAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; . Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); O Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); r- Irrigation notes Vy REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/s X 11) (color rendering if possible) IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. 0 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all side of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four_ sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required SIGNAGE: (Section 4-202.A.16) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required) V Reduced signage proposal (8'/i X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Page 4 of 5 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater Ak r-7 L. SIGNATURE: . }? llsbo?o?l. I, the undersigned,, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF WAIF ILAS ??- application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and S Worn to and subscribed before me this Z? day of authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property ( _ A. D. 20O to me and/or by described in this application. who is personally known Ryas. Rrnritngri ac Signature of property owner or representative ry public, Mpsnft 6alon DD0827 My commission expires: al) M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: In r- a ?1o? a cn? norrnr?-'tby?. (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): JV-1-e- 2+A0tC-KeA P1? l? apt 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Go ?n 4 f e&uLctt o +kc> tit P11 n A 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: jq11'VI[ Quklel? as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; * ©(4# er re?,ues?'s a BPRG Yn??flnc{ in Conn e?i?torl her' r i"/?. 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and7'ecreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. UX4Z'Q!)- -?? V, C e- ropTP e n Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of he State of Florida, on this day of -L,G personally appeared 5 ro Ks Who ving been first duly sworn Dep s and says that he/she fully understands the Fonlents 64the affidavit that he/sh gned. ???' "?• Yatrtcla JJ GGee en pFCommission # CC 902313 My Commission Expires: rai- ?,=a< Expires Feb. 15, 2004 Notary Public %i• Bonded Thru '?.,q f X I%•` Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. S:IR'anning Department Opplication Formsldevelopment review lcomprehensive infill application2.doc Page 5 of 5 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater LEGAL DESCRIPTION 483 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, 33767, is described as: Lots 32 through 43, block "B", first addition to Clearwater Beach Park, as recorded in plat book 15, page 80, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the adjacent'/2 of a vacated alley lying along the east boundary thereof. And together with: Lots 2 through 8, block "K, replat of Block "A" and lots 1 to 15 incl. block "B" of Clearwater Beach Park first addition, according to the plat thereof as recorded in plat book 21, page 21 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the adjacent Y2 of a vacated alley lying along the west boundary thereof. i EXHIBIT "A" r Lots 32 through 43, block "B", first addition to Clearwater Beach Park, as recorded in plat book 15, page 80, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the adjacent '/2 of a vacated alley lying along the east boundary thereof. And together with: Lots 2 through 8, block "A", replat of Block "A" and lots 1 to 15 incl. block "B" of Clearwater Beach Park first addition, according to the plat thereof as recorded in plat book 21, page 21 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the adjacent '/2 of a vacated alley lying along the west boundary thereof. 0 0 FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE AT PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1.) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The site is an existing mixed-use shopping center on Mandalay Ave. Outback Steakhouse intends on remodeling space previously occupied by a grocery store. The remodel plans will be in harmony with the present architecture of the building. 2.) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The construction of our restaurant should encourage additional development in the area and should help property values as we will be taking vacant space and turning it into a productive use. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or person residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The restaurant will not be engaged in any activity that will adversely affect the general public. 4.) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Parking for the restaurant is at the rear of the center and will create no additional congestion on Mandalay Ave. The existing site has 101 parking spaces in the rear of the building and there are an additional 270 public parking spaces within a 1000' radius to the site. The City of Clearwater intends to replace the 101 parking spaces in the rear of the building with a 450 space parking garage. Our operation is typically dinner only; therefore the daytime traffic impact will be minimal. 5.) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Outback Steakhouse's addition to the shopping center on Mandalay Ave. will be consistent with the mixed use of retail, restaurant, and government/office uses already present on this street. The fagade of the restaurant will be designed to maintain the community character of the center as it presently exists. 6.) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The facade of the restaurant will be designed to blend in with the existing building to provide a visually pleasing effect. The restaurant will comply with all codes and or ordinances relating to acoustic or olfactory concerns. Our hours of operation are typically during dinner hours (4 to 11 PM) and should not impact neighboring residents or businesses. 0 0 Address all applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested. The Pelican Walk Shopping Center is located in a Tourist Zoning District. The site is on the North end of Clearwater Beach in an area that is presently undergoing significant redevelopment. With the addition of our restaurant to this shopping center, the site will be underparked by approximately 90 spaces. However, with the existing and proposed hotel, residential, and office uses in the immediate vicinity, and the pedestrian friendly nature of the surrounding area, the availability of additional public parking facilities, and the planned construction of a new City owned parking garage behind the building, we ask that a request for a code parking reduction be granted. It is also the feeling of the Planning and Zoning staff that patio dining be provided for to blend in with the redevelopment of Mandalay Ave. We would like to accommodate and ask for approval for patio dining. 0 0 PARKING ANALYSIS PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER 483 Mandalay Ave. Clearwater, Beach, Fl 33767 Restaurants - 7 Spaces / 1000 GFA Unit # Tenant Sq. Ft. Parks Req'd 109 Theo's Gyros 2100 14.70 115-118 Outback Steakhouse 6300 44.10 201 Burger King 2954 20.68 214-215 Kiku Japanese Steak House 2700 18.90 Total Parking Spaces 98.38 Retail and Services - 4 Spaces / 1000 GFA 111 Legendary Cigars 900 112 Surf City 900 113 Jolly Trolly 900 206 Whitehouse Gear 1500 209 Sharmaine Hair, Nail Salon 900 220 Island Health & Fitness 4652 Total Parkin S aces s? g p Office / Government - 3 Spaces 11000 GFA 207 Liberty Capital 900 208 Clearwater Police 900 210 Viewpoint Realty International 11 Total Panting Spaces Available - 3 Spaces 11000 GFA Min. 101-105 Available 106-108 Available 114 Available 211 Available 212 Available 213 Available Total Panting Spaces Total Required Spaces Existing Spaces Total Underparked 3575 4200 900 900 900 900 ? 33,1 190.41 101 89.41 3.60 3.60 3.60 6.00 3.60 18.61 39.01 2.70 3.60 4.80 11.10 10.73 16.80 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 41.93 W rS??d? = 3? lei I;Z.7Z ??? ? I s3 57 z FILE COPY AUS 210-2 1 • A%Rd {f ", W-l nik, ee wl-mroal>I Olum 101l&a ,_76 A#"„_ - - 4F t_= 7-7 41, 1 4i L d _ ..._ _ j 0 LC C? #ss cps(/ (/ Li"S-) San, Mo-,-,6 ma,daP4.a. 2?, a?o . l2? AU3 ! 12002 7EV-, FILE COPY F/ a /c. co; ? - 0 • OUTE3ACK FEAKHOU5E CLEARWATER E3EACN, FL 5CALE: i/8"=V-0" PROP05Eq ELEVATION AUG. 23, 2002 (FlF r. II AUG 2 7 X332 CIiYGF? 791 Bayway Boulevard August 21, 2002 Clearwater VIA HAND DELIVERY Florida City of Clearwater Planning Department 33767-2610 100 South Myrtle Avenue 727.447.1075 Voice Clearwater, Florida 33756 727.447.1035 Fax Re: Outback Steakhouse, Inc./Pelican Walk Flexible Standard Development Application www.Eko-Low.com Dear Sir or Madam: This will confirm the undersigned represents B.J.E., Inc., the owner of Pelican Walk. This is with regard to the above-captioned application. The undersigned hereby requests that you please schedule a PRC eting with regard to this application for Outback Steakhouse, '--bc., and inform the undersigned and Outback Steakhouse as to the date and time of same. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you. Very truly yours, NKONOMIDES, P. A. omides NCE/pjc cc: Outback Steakhouse, Inc. B.J.E., Inc. f AUS 2 2002 F FILE COPY tUTBACK STEAKHOUSE, NC. 2202 N. West Shore Blvd. • 5th Floor • Tampa, FL 33607 Phone (813) 282-1225 • Fax (813) 282-1209 www.outback.com August 21, 2002 Mr. Wayne Wells Planning Dept. City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Street Clearwater, Fl. 33756 Re: Proposed Outback Steakhouse on Clearwater Beach Dear Mr. Wells: Please accept Outback Steakhouse's application for a Flexible Standard Development at our proposed location at 483 Mandalay Ave in Clearwater Beach. We plan to remodel existing space within Pelican Walk. No changes will be made to either the existing parking or existing landscaping. This submittal includes a signed application, survey, present and proposed elevations, signage, a parking analysis of existing conditions, and an aerial showing all the public parking within a 1000 foot radius. We look forward to being on the September 12, 2002, DRC agenda. Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely: Kevin Garden Site Development Cc: Steve Stanley, Project Manager Jamie Butler, Land Development Manager AUG 2 2 ZUU2 C'= `.. -- -T - vCc P, IS FILE COPY 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED 2'X 8' SINGLE-FACED OUTBACK SIGN 34'-6112" ® 4D?1G STEAKHOUSE i ry. EXISTING ISLAND HEALTH AND FITNESS SIGN TO BE RELOCATED , - t, 35'-8" / i?- EACH WINDOW IS 82 SQ. FT. 16 SQ. FT. NEON USED =19.5%a OF WINDOW SPACE SCALE 118" =1'-0" AUG 2' 2uU2 i. . J1-LLI. Lp THIS DESIGN IS SUBMITTED AS PART OF OUR PROPOSAL AND IS TOREMAIN OUR PROPERTY EXCLUSIVELY UNTIL ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY PURCHASE. FILE COPV PROPOSED 2'X 10' DOUBLE-FACED BLADE SIGN 1...1 ?. United Sign Systems 1...1 PH. 888-704-1516 0 0 0 0 h n.+ .. '?",.. ?'•?,14n ? .'q ?.: J..? ?'r w1 vM ? +.q .It'd .s?. «{r .ilM`'?.( 4 ILE COPY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS December 17, 2002 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2°d Floor Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Outback Steakhouse (FLS2002-08063) - Parking Analysis Dear Mr. Wells: s Please find enclosed three (3) copies of the Parking Analysis for the proposed Outback Steakhouse restaurant. This analysis was completed in accordance with the methodology discussed at our November 25, 2002 meeting. This analysis shows at the peak usage hour there were 233 unused parking spaces, which is more than adequate to accommodate the Outback Steakhouse parking requirements of 44 spaces (calculated using 7'spaces/1,000 s.£). We look forward to your review and approval. Sincerely, Robert C. Pergol z AICP Vice President/ Transportation and Planning :az LAwells-Ldoc Encl. cc: Jamie Butler, Outback Steakhouse 997-226.40.06 6 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8606 • ZV • DEC 1 7 2002 l? u L, ?I CiT`f 0 CLEAR'A'Ai LR \?*.z voo FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. NV/RONME MUSTS, SURVEYORS & PNERS ?2saov2 ??3 PARKING ANALYSIS L1 DEC 1 7 2002 FrAviNliIG S fitl.'rCLOP fJ!t`_p l E"Voti FOR Cl Y OF Cl. EAR'NA-1 ER OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE PELICAN WALK CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared for: OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE Prepared by: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. DECEMBER, 2002 FDC PROJECT #997-226 • TABLE OF CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION II.METHODOLOGY III.EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS IV.FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE V.CONCLUSION APPENDIX Robert C. Per i , AICP AICP #9023 • I. INTRODUCTION Outback Steakhouse is planning to lease space within Pelican Walk at 483 N. Mandalay Avenue on Clearwater Beach. Pelican Walk is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue south of Baymont Street. (See Figure 1). The restaurant is proposed to contain 6,300 square feet and will utilize private parking located in the Pelican Walk parking lot. The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district and contains 101 on-site parking spaces. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code requires a minimum parking requirement of 7 spaces to 15 spaces/1000 s.f. According to strict interpretation of the code, the restaurant would require a minimum of 44 parking spaces to a maximum of 95 parking spaces. As calculated by the City of Clearwater, the Pelican Walk complex would require between 230-360 parking spaces. According to the code there is a parking space deficiency. The code does provide for reducing the required number of on-site parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in required parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required, and if adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. City of Clearwater staff has recognized that Pelican Walk is located in close proximity to municipal parking lots, on-street parking spaces, and potential for beach "walk-up" customers. The staff also recognizes that the public parking spaces serve two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide parking for beach related businesses. The applicant believes the addition of a quality restaurant with hours of operation from 4 P.M. - 11 P.M., would not significantly alter parking demand and that adequate parking exists within a reasonable distance to support the restaurant. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces. H. METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed that FDC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday and Saturday between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. The study area included the Pelican Walk parking lot, Municipal Lots #34, #35, #36 and #38, on-street parking on Rockaway Street and on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue between Baymont Street and Bay Esplanade. These areas include a total of 426 parking spaces of which 11 are designated for handicapped parking. In addition, the reconstruction of Mandalay Avenue/San Marco Street and Papaya Street will provide an additional 51 parking spaces that are not available due to ongoing construction. These were not included in the analysis. As requested, the normal business hours of businesses in the study area were recorded. Very few businesses stay open until 10 P.M. with many closing prior to 9 P.M. Open businesses included Eckerd, Beach Gameland, Surf City, Subway and several other restaurants. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. on Friday, December 6 h and Saturday, December 7, 2002. Both days were partly cloudy and seasonable (65 - 75 degrees) representing typical December weather. The parking lots within walking distance of Pelican Walk were checked on the hour for the number of spaces that ' were occupied. The location of each occupied space was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study area. RAOUTBACK STEAKHOUSE PELICAN WALK.DOC _ 1 _ ©Copyright 2001 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproaucea witnout written permission. The Pelican Walk parking lot which is located on the east side of the shopping plaza on Poinsettia Avenue contains 101 parking spaces. The main parking facilities that serve the Mandalay Avenue business district are four city municipal lots. Municipal Lot #34 contains 23 metered parking spaces plus 1 handicapped space and is located across from the Hilton. Municipal Lot #35 contains 25 metered parking plus 1 handicapped and is located south of the Eckerds. Municipal Lot 36 contains 145 metered parking spaces plus 5 handicapped spaces. This lot is located directly along the beach and is bordered by Rockaway Street, Mandalay Avenue and Bay Esplanade. Municipal Lot #38 contains 79 metered parking spaces plus 4 handicapped spaces. This lot is located east of Mandalay Avenue on the south side of Bay Esplanade. There also is on-street parking located on Rockaway Street (20 spaces) and Mandalay Avenue (22 spaces) between Baymont Street and Bay Esplanade. All are within a 1,000 foot radius of Pelican Walk as prescribed by code. Friday, December 6, 2002 Parking demand varied slightly throughout the evening with a low of 60 occupied spaces (15%) at 5 P.M. to a peak demand of 141 occupied spaces (33%) at 8 P.M. As such, there were a minimum of 285 unused spaces in the study area throughout the evening. Closer analysis shows Pelican Walk, Municipal Lot #36 and Municipal Lot #38 were severely underutilized. Only Municipal Lot #35 and on-street parking on Rockaway Street were near being full. Table 1 provides on hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Saturday, December 7, 2002 Parking demand varied slightly as the studied parking areas had a low of 119 occupied spaces (28%) and a peak occurred at 9 P.M. with 193 occupied spaces (45%) and, as such, there was a minimum of 233 unused spaces in the study area throughout the evening. As was the case on Friday, the Pelican Walk lot, Municipal Lot #34, Municipal Lot #36 and Municipal Lot #38 were underutilized. Only Municipal Lot #35 and on-street parking on Rockaway Street were near being full. Table 2 provides on hourly tabulation and Figure 3 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Customer Characteristics Since the Outback Steakhouse does not exist, obtaining customer surveys was not possible. However, a previous study conducted for Frenchy's Rockaway Grill indicated 50% of the customers were "walk-up" customers that were at Clearwater Beach for other reasons and visited Frenchy's as a side stop. A previous study conducted for Post Corner Pizza indicates 61 % of the customers were at Clearwater beach for reasons other than visiting Post Corner Pizza. Outback will not be open during peak "beachgoer" hours. Due to its dinner only operation Outback Steakhouse may not achieve the same rate of "walk-up" customers from the beach as the Frenchy's or Post Corner Pizza restaurants, however, it is reasonable to assume, since this is a beach location, a large portion of their customers will be "captured" from nearby hotels and residential developments. These include the Hilton, Clearwater Beach Hotel, Mandalay Beach Club (157 condominiums) and Belle Harbor (200 condominiums under construction). Each of these locations and other nearby motels provide ample on-site parking such that customers can walk to the Outback Steakhouse while leaving their cars parked at home or hotel. In addition, the Jolly Trolley stops directly in front of Pelican Walk which will aid in keeping parking space demand lower. There are several other Outback Steakhouse locations in Dunedin, Largo and St. Petersburg, such that the Clearwater Beach location would not be a destination for those on the mainland. R\OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE PELICAN WALK.DOC -2- TABLE 1 FRIDAY DECEMBER 6, 2002 nu_croccr oe129r1ur_ PELICAN WALK LOT MUNICIPAL LOT#34 MUNICIPAL LOT # 35 *MUNICIPAL LOT # 36 ROCKAWAY MANDALAY *MUNICIPAL LOT # 38 TOTAL TIME OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL % OCCUPIED 4:00 PM 38 101 0 24 0 26 14 150 11 20 0 22 2 83 65 426 15% 5:00 PM 29 101 0 24 0 26 13 150 12 20 4 22 2 83 60 426 14% 6:00 PM 30 101 0 24 10 26 16 150 12 20 5 22 1 83 74 426 17% 7:00 PM 29 101 6 24 22 26 20 150 14 20 6 22 2 83 99 426 23% 8:00 PM 30 101 8 24 25 26 43 150 18 20 12 22 5 83 141 426 33% 9:00 PM 30 101 4 24 20 26 37 150 14 20 7 22 7 83 119 426 28% 10:00 PM 21 101 3 24 14 26 27 150 12 20 7 22 4 83 88 426 21% *INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT #34 *INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT #35 *INCLUDES 5 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #36 *INCLUDES 4 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #38 DOES NOT INCLUDE FUTURE SPACES ALONG MANDALAY (36 S. OF BAYMONT), 8 SPACES ALONG PAPAYA, AND 7 SPACES ALONG SAN MARCO. • 9 PERCENT OCCUPANCY FOR FRIDAY DECEMBER 6, 2002 35% w 30% 25% V 0 20% Z 15% W u 10% w a 5% 0% 0 0 0 0 75 CL 0 0 0 0 ti 0- 0 0 0 0 66 ai 0 0 0 • • TIME FIGURE 2 TABLE 2 SATURDAY DECEMBER 7, 2002 [nN.RTRFFT PARKINr; PELICAN WALK LOT MUNICIPAL LOT#34 MUNICIPAL LOT # 35 *MUNICIPAL LOT # 36 ROCKAWAY MANDALAY *MUNICIPAL LOT # 38 TOTAL TIME OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL % OCCUPIED 4:00 PM 27 101 0 24 1 26 110 150 18 20 0 22 1 83 157 426 37% 5:00 PM 26 101 0 24 2 26 79 150 19 20 2 22 0 83 128 426 30% 6:00 PM 21 101 2 24 4 26 68 150 20 20 3 22 1 83 119 426 28% 7:00 PM 18 101 3 24 17 26 69 150 18 20 5 22 6 83 136 426 32% 8:00 PM 24 101 3 24 25 26 81 150 16 20 7 22 33 83 189 426 440/( 0 9:00 PM 19 101 6 24 20 26 75 150 15 20 11 22 47 83 193 426 45% 10:00 PM 16 101 7 24 16 26 49 150 20 20 7 22 39 83 154 426 36% *INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT #34 *INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT #35 *INCLUDES 5 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #36 *INCLUDES 4 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #38 DOES NOT INCLUDE FUTURE SPACES ALONG MANDALAY (36 S. OF BAYMONT), 8 SPACES ALONG PAPAYA, AND 7 SPACES ALONG SAN MARCO. • 0 PERCENT OCCUPANCY FOR SATURDAY DECEMBER 7, 2002 50% w 45% a 40% U 35% V 30% 0 25% Z 20% w 15% L) 10% a 5% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ?- 0 ti oo ai TIME FIGURE 3 0 0 • • IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE The proposed restaurant would require 44-95 spaces according to strict interpretation of the City of ' Clearwater Community Development Code. Assuming the worst case a minimum of 233 spaces are available to satisfy any additional parking demand created by the restaurant, therefore there is adequate parking available to support the proposed restaurant. At that time only 19 spaces in Pelican ' Walk were occupied. While the Community Development Code considers a minimum requirement of 7-15 spaces per ' 1,000 s.f. of floor area for restaurants in the tourist district, no consideration is given to the fact that many customers have no parking demand. This is due to the fact that "walkups" are possible and Outback Steakhouse typically has an evening peak long after normal beach peak hours and a captured market from hotels and condominiums exists. I V. CONCLUSION This parking analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology discussed with the City of Clearwater staff. This analysis shows of the total 426 parking spaces included in the study area a maximum of 193 were occupied during any hour of the study period. As such, adequate parking is available within a reasonable walking distance of Pelican Walk to support the addition of the Outback Steakhouse. I R\OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE PELICAN WALK.DOC _3_ r ? /9??HaS??oS iU•1?1' 10 .mss ?eA?`1 ?p p J? d o o r ?" ?.w.? ?i ck`l V ? c crf •' ?-?' e v e-? ? FILE COPY FLS2002=08063 483 MANDALAY AVE 115 Date Received: 8/22/2002 OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 267A CLWCoverSheet V AUG 2 2 z CKC NOe+.,_ 1? o ?s 9 002 a WE PL,r flit Upy i • LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Mr. Steve Spencer RE: 483 Mandalay Ave. (Outback Restaurant) "Landscaping Issue" Dear Mr. Spencer: x?d -6 Mir . S p S/14/ 03 I have met with Cyndi Tarapani, City of Clearwater Planning Director and Lisa Fierce, Asst. City Planning Director on 12 May 2003 in regards to the Condition of Approval (#7.) for FLS2002-08063 which states, "that any dead or dying plant material required under prior approvals be brought into compliance by June 20, 2003." While there is progress for a parking facility to be built at this location, it appears that it is not in the immediate timeframe and the above condition should be met. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Frank G. Gerlock BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • Wells, Wayne From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 2:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Gerlock, Frank Subject: RE: message from Wayne - check your mailbox; a very timely letter came from the owner agreeing to landscape by a certain date; you should be able to explain to steve spencer why we required landscaping; steve may not agree, but we have already finalized this deal; as cyndi indicated, please dont send folks to her - you need to discuss with frank and/or me as part of the open communication process Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department Ifierce@clearwater-fl.com 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan GO BUC(K)S! -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 2:12 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank Subject: FW: message from I would hope that either Lisa or Frank can solve this type of issue, rather than sending the customer directly to me. Lisa and Frank-please work this out. I do have a copy of the parking garage agreement and will get to Angel for a copy to each of you-I think I may have provided one before. The garage is still a ways out so the landscaping for this site needs to be addressed. I will trust your judgement on this-please see me if you want to discuss. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 ctarapan@clearwater-fl.com -----Original Message----- From: Haines, Angel Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 9:22 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: message from Steve Spencer was referred to you from Wayne re: the Pelican Walk Parking Lot which is requiring landscaping at the Outback. Replacement of the landscaping was a requirement of the DO for Outback. He wants to know why this landscaping has to be done since they will put a parking garage in soon. He asked for you to call him at 504-1175. Thx. Angel Haines Senior Staff Assistant Planning Department City of Clearwater (727) 562-4579 -TV ??jj ? D?rN6 EK M IDES 791 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater • May 9, 2003 Florida VLq HAND DELIVERY ID C 33767-2610 Mr. Kevin Garriott 727.447,1075 Voice City of Clearwater ' Planning and Development Services ` 727,447.1035 Fax PLA'.? ??Vci_t: 100 South Myrtle Avenue ;,- CLi=k:, # Clearwater, Florida 33756 www.Eko-Law.com Re: Pelican Walk Shopping Center Dear Mr. Garriott: This will confirm the undersigned represents B.J.E., Inc., the owner of the Pelican Walk Shopping Center where Outback Steakhouse is located. This will also confirm that B.J.E., Inc., will restripe the parking lot and include requisite handicap parking spaces per code closest to the pedestrian access points of the Pelican Walk Shopping Center before June 20, 2003. Finally, this will confirm that B.J.E., Inc., will ensure existing landscaping is maintained and replaced per code requirements before June 20, 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you. Very truly yours, NICKOLAS EKONOMIDES,, P.A. sf' Nickolas C. Ekonomides NCE/pj c cc: B.J.E., Inc. 1 9 11 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 24, 2002 Mr. Jamie Butler C/o Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. 2202 North Westshore Boulevard, 5th Floor Tampa, Florida 33607 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2002-08063 at 483 Mandalay Avenue (Outback Restaurant) Dear Mr. Butler: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On September 12, 2002, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes a 6,300 square foot restaurant located within an existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the restaurant criteria of Section 2-802.0; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area; 4. Adequate parking for this restaurant will be available on-site or within close proximity to the subject property; and 5. The proposal is in compliance with the Retail and Restaurant District as outlined in Beach by Design. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" December 24, 2002 Butler - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That tables, chairs, umbrellas and any other fixture used in conjunction with the outdoor caf6 be maintained in a clean and attractive appearance and be in good repair at all times; 2. That all nonpermanent fixtures, as well as tables and chairs, be removed from the entire outdoor cafe area in the case of an extreme wind event; 3. That the outdoor cafe area, including an area five feet beyond, be maintained in a neat and orderly appearance at all times and be cleared of all debris on a periodic basis during the day and at the close of each business day; 4. That all new construction or remodeling match the existing exterior color and materials of the building; 5. That the screening of the proposed 10-foot by 15-foot equipment area (on the northeast corner of the building) match the existing building color; 6. That proposed or relocated signage meet Code requirements; 7. That any dead or dying plant material required under prior approvals be brought into compliance by June 20, 2003; 8. That a maximum of 50% of the total floor area of the shopping center be utilized for bar or restaurant uses; and 9. That handicap parking signage and handicap parking space dimensions be revised to meet the requirements of the Traffic Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard 'Development. The approval is based on, and must adhere to, the site plan and application dated October 18, 2002 and the parking study dated December 17, 2002. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (December 24, 2003). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. e December 24, 2002 Butler - Page 3 In addition, please be aware that an, appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.A by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to the surrounding property owners. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on December 31, 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director CC: Surrounding Property Owners SAPlanning Department\C D B\Standard F1ex\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-12-02 DRC\Mandalay 483 Outback Steakhouse\Mandalay 483 Development Order.doc • 0 OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE, INC. 0803 2202 N. West Shore Blvd. • 5th Floor - Tampa, FL 33607 Phone (813) 282-1225 • Fax (813) 282-1209 www.outback.com October 18, 2002 D i e;; f'V' E 1 To: Ms. Lisa Fierce OCT' s Clearwater Planning Dept. 1J j 2002 Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl. 33 FJ?v ^I?f?G& Cyr €.ii,3??tf raTSt?C From: Outback Steakhouse Re: Proposed Outback Steakhouse - 483 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater Beach, Fl Dear Lisa: This narrative is in response to the comments presented by the Development Review Committee at the September 12, 2002 meeting. Parks and Recreation: (a) No comments to address Traffic Engineering: (a) A new site plan and survey have been prepared by EMK Consultants of Florida and are a part of this resubmittal. The survey reflects the current conditions as of the survey date. (b) Our lease with B.J.E. Inc. provides for Outback Steakhouse to have three (3) spaces reserved for take-away parking. (c) Transportation Impact Fees will be paid prior to C.O. Courey Martins of the Traffic Division advised us that we should receive credit for the existing use of our lease space. General Engineering: (a) A utility plan has been provided that shows all existing and proposed utilities. All backflow preventor devices are shown on the plan. Stormwater: (a) No comments to address Planning: (a) A site plan has been prepared showing the proposed revisions to the building, corridor, and site. The footprint of the building will not change. All exterior modifications will match the existing building. (a-1) The two additional dumpsters have been removed and will not be shown on the survey. (a-2) The landscape "diamonds" are shown on the survey and the site plan. (a-3) The handicap parking upgraded to Code requirements is shown on the site plan. (a-4) The compact space has been removed from the architect's plan. • • (a-5) The footprint of the building will not be changing. The corridor is being moved and is shown on the site plan along with any relative changes to the parking, sidewalks, etc. (a-6) The second floor walkway is shown and called out on the survey. (a-7) The existing and proposed gross floor area and floor area ratios are shown on the site plan. C , Outdoor Dining: (1) Umbrellas will not have any logos, pictures, or advertising on them. (2) Outdoor tables and chairs will be constructed from heavy wrought iron or other similar material and will not be bolted down. Their weight will be enough to resist tom) a? C1 being blown around by any wind. In the case of an extreme wind event, all exterior tables and chairs will be moved inside. (3) The restaurant's staff will keep the outdoor dining area clean. (4) A railing will surround the outdoor dining area and the restaurant staff will make sure patrons stay in this area while consuming alcoholic beverages. (a) The building department certification of the building being flood proofed will be provided. All modifications to the exterior of the building will be returned to a flood proofed condition. c? (b) A revised parking calculation has been included. (c) See attached parking narrative. (d) According to the Clearwater Community Development Code, a restaurant is defined as a use a use providing for the preparation or sale of prepared food for consumption by customers primarily on the premises, including the subordinate sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises, but excluding facilities with prepared food service within grocery stores and delicatessens. Outback Steakhouses is a full service, sit down restaurant in which less than fifteen percent of our gross sales are derived from the sale of alcoholic beverages. (e) Signage elevations are included with this submittal and will be followed up with engineered drawings under separate submittal. (f) Building plans, elevations, colors, and finishes are consistent with the existing building. (g) The value of the project is $800,000.00 Solid Waste (a) According to our lease with BJE Inc., Outback Steakhouse is responsible for its own trash. Outback is coordinating with Louis Anastasopoulos on the logistics of sharing a dumpster with other tenants. Increasing the frequency of trash pick-up is anticipated. Land Resource: (a) No comments to address Fire: (a) No comments to address a nrT 1 R ?00? ' POPY VILE 4 .7 • Landscaping: (a) It is the landlord's intent to fully comply with all existing applicable code provisions as necessary under the circumstances. (b) The parking lot diamonds will be retrofitted with sabal palms and pennesitum grass. (c) The building's owner will explore opportunities to landscape Poinsetta Avenue. Outback Steakhouse has no contractual obligation to provide any modifications to the existing Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at 813-282-1225 or at kevin arg den@outback.com. We are anxious to move this project forward as quickly as possible and would appreciate any assistance that you can provide. Sincerely: ??a.?... Kevin Garden Site Development OCT 18 2002 FILE UPI • • OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE CLEARWATER BEACH, FL. PARKING NARRATIVE Outback Steakhouse is proposing to lease space in the Pelican Walk Shopping Center at 483 Mandalay Avenue on the north end of Clearwater Beach for use as a restaurant. The City of Clearwater's Flexible Design Standard allows a restaurant parking requirement ranging from 7 spaces per 1000 square feet to 15 spaces per 1000 square feet, depending on the circumstance. It is Outback's contention that the lower range, 7 spaces per 1000 square feet, is appropriate for the Clearwater Beach location. The City of Clearwater, at their September 12 Development Review Committee meeting, indicated that they would like to see a parking analysis using the higher range requirement, 15 spaces per 1000 square feet. This would increase the required parking by 50 spaces. Although Outback does not agree with using the higher parking calculation, the 7 spaces per 1000 square feet and the 15 spaces per 1000 square feet calculations are attached at the end of this narrative. CUSTOMER BASE Due to the unique island setting, the Clearwater Beach Outback does not meet normal company standards for customer demographics. The number of target residences within the normal radius from the restaurant does not exist. Outback is certain that the restaurant will be supported in large part by the transient tourist base that is already utilizing the beach area, the abundance of guests at hotels and other rental properties and the current and planned residential properties that are within walking- itance. Agwajmu_mber of customers wi c?fo f res auran om prope ies w ere their automobiles are already Unlike a true "beach" bar/restaurant, such as Frenchy's on Clearwater Beach, Outback has other restaurants that are outside of, but in close proximity to, Clearwater Beach. The "beach" bar/restaurant, with its only location on the beach, is a destination for customers and their automobiles from outside the beach area. Outback Steakhouse offers other nearby locations and the Clearwater Beach restaurant will not be a "destination". PARKING STUDY The parking spaces counted in the Outback parking study include the 101 spaces present on the Pelican Walk site and all ublic s aces within a 1000-foot radius o t e site. o private spaces were considered. It should be consi e d, owever, that if the north portion of Clearwater Beach develops to the point that additional parking is consistently needed, or if there is a special event requiring additional parking, private parking spaces will bec_ ome available as owners of unused spaces begin to charge for parking. There is also a public parking lot, Municipal Lot # 38 A; tt s?ust_out . 00=feot radius and contains 79 additional spaces. n q i '. VIE Uv y a.. v2 r • . Outback's initial parking study used the criteria of 7 spaces per 1000 square feet of restaurant space to calculate required parking. The required number of parking spaces previous y were available within the 1000-foot radius. The City of Clearwater has approved the 7 spaces per 1000 square meet criteria for a "beach" bar/restaurant applicant that Outback feels has a greater parking need than will the proposed Outback Steakhouse. Even with this in mind, Outback feels that the number of parking spaces required using the criteria of 15 spaces per 1000 square feet are reasonably available using a 1000 foot radius parking space search. SIMILAR SITUATIONS South Beach, Miami Beach, FL - The Outback Steakhouse in Miami Beach has no dedicated parking. The situation is very similar to the proposed Clearwater Beach location whereas the customer base consists largely of tourists and local residents who walk from their hotel or home. The small percentage of customers who drive to the restaurant utilize public garage or street parking. The restaurant does a robust business and parking has not been an issue. 0 W,Q I _A1P#V,X, Gatlinburg, TN - The restaurant in Gatlinburg relies in great percentage on a tourist customer base. Customers who drive to the restaurant use public parking that is shared by other restaurants and attractions in the area. Historic Downtown Savannah, GA - The Outback recently opened in downtown Savannah relies solely upon public parking, which is also used by all other businesses in the area. The shared parking works well with the diverse mix of uses. HOURS OF OPERATION General hours of operation for Outback Steakhouse will be from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days a week, with peak hours from about 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Customers will not compete for parking with the normal daytime beach-goers or daytime businesses. CONCLUSIONS • Outback feels that a parking requirement of 7 spaces per 1000 square feet is appropriate for the Clearwater Beach restaurant. That ratio has previously been approved for other restaurants that promote themselves as "Beach Bars". Unlike those establishments, Outback offers other restaurant locations outside the beach area that potential customers may choose to patronize because of better drive-to conditions. Also unlike those establishments, Outback does no promotions, such as special drink price nights and celebrity sports star_inte trif e t create the need for additional parking. 'J + t u., ?i"t• S vL • G A} y'_ o ?• i U 7 FIE (POP • • • It is Outback's belief that the majority of customers will come from the Clearwater Beach area and will not be a destination for people from the mainland, except in the situation where they will come to the beach for other activities. • With the surrounding hotels and condominiums, and with the pedestrian friendly nature of Clearwater Beach, many of Outback's customers will be "walk-ups". • Outback Steakhouse is a dinner only operation and would not interfere with any daytime parking uses. • Outback Steakhouse has dealt with similar situations in other beach locations as shown in the examples provided. • Parking studies that have been done for other establishments have shown that even at peak times on weekends, there are still sufficient parking spaces available. • Other parking opportunities may present themselves, which would further alleviate any potential parking problems. Sufficient parking exists on the North end of Clearwater Beach to support the operation of an Outback Steakhouse. Outback Steakhouse operates over 800 restaurants and sufficient parking at each and every restaurant is vital to the success of that restaurant. Outback would not consider building the Clearwater Beach restaurant if there was a concern about a shortage of parking and Outback is simply asking that the same criteria that has been used by other restaurants and commercial establishments, and approved by the city under the Flexible Design Standards, be used and approved for our application. OCT 18 2002' '.! ! ILE PARKING ANALYSIS PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER 483 Mandalay Ave. Clearwater, Beach, Fl 33767 Restaurants - 7 Spaces / 1000 GFA Unit # Tenant Sq. Ft. Parks Req'd 109 Theo's Gyros 2100 14.70 115-118 Outback Steakhouse 6300 44.10 201 Burger King 2954 20.68 214-215 Kiku Japanese Steak House 2700 18.90 Total Parking Spaces 98.38 Retail and Services - 4 Spaces / 1000 GFA 111 Legendary Cigars 900 3.60 112 Surf City 900 3.60 113 Jolly Trolly 900 3.60 206 Whitehouse Gear 1500 6.00 209 Sharmaine Hair, Nail Salon 900 3.60 _20 Island Health & Fitness 4652 18.61 Total Parking Spaces 39.01 Office / Government - 3 Spaces / 1000 GFA 207 Liberty Capital 900 2.70 208 Clearwater Police 900 3.60 210 Viewpoint Realty International 1200 4.80 Total Parking Spaces 11.10 Available - 3 Spaces / 1000 GFA Min. 101-105 Available 3575 10.73 106-108 Available 4200 16.80 114 Available 900 3.60 211 Available 900 3.60 212 Available 900 3.60 213 Available 900 3.60 Total Parking Spaces 41.93 Total Required Spaces 190.41 Existing Spaces _ 101 Total Underparked 89.41 CGS OCT 18 2002 C! i f f _ y •I FILE COPY 0 0 PARKING ANALYSIS PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER 483 Mandalay Ave. Clearwater, Beach, Fl 33767 Restaurants - 7 Spaces 11000 GFA Unit # Tenant Sq. Ft. Parks Req'd 109 Theo's Gyros 2100 14.70 201 Burger King 2954 20.68 214-215 Kiku Japanese Steak House 2700 18.90 Total Parking Spaces 54.28 Outback Steakhouse -15 Spaces / 1000 GFA 115-118 Outback Steakhouse 6300 94.50 Retail and Services - 4 Spaces / 1000 GFA 111 Legendary Cigars 900 3.60 112 Surf City 900 3.60 113 Jolly Trolly 900 3.60 206 Whitehouse Gear 1500 6.00 209 Sharmaine Hair, Nail Salon 900 3.60 220 Island Health & Fitness 4652 18.61 Total Parking Spaces 39.01 Office / Government - 3 Spaces / 1000 GFA 207 Liberty Capital 900 2.70 2013 Clearwater Police 900 3.60 210 Viewpoint Realty International 1200 4.80 Total Parking Spaces 11.10 Available - 3 Spaces / 1000 GFA Min. 101-105 Available 3575 10.73 106-108 Available 4200 16.80 114 Available 900 3.60 211 Available 900 3.60 212 Available 900. 3.60 213 Available 900 3.60 Total Parking Spaces 41.93 Total Required Spaces Existing Spaces 240.81 101 Total Underparked ?j13 81r r, ! a ' t 2002 I F I L El C C9 P V FABRICATION/ASSY NOTES p Id Y R.QS ALAN ANSIE ERNE oRD AlIIL FATE Aw ?eTUAa 9' OUTBACK OPEWACE CANNEL LETTERS a WITH 5'.040 A- M. RETIJB6 p 2 U6' PLS'RHROJGH ACRYLIC STFDYJIOM 3' X.125' SO AWL TIDING Z 616725' ALL" PLATE (D BCmER NEON 3/r BOLTS ® (2) INfERN& FL, LAMPS WITH BALLAST GRAPHIC COLORS MOUNTING HARDWARE ® OJMCA BLlE X285 WTCDS) AS REG. TO WALL ® OUTBACK RED (MAP 42-212) ® WA O WA a ® WA b 0 ®WA ac a ?e ELECTRICAL SPEGFICATIONS a m (K]BALLASTS ? TRANSFORMERS n it OTY DESCRIPTION W IU 3 D D ? NEON ? LAMPS a 8'-44 8 7'4? 0 OOTAE RII OGOAPfION 5 I NFON 6 4m VOLTAGE. ® IMAM ? mV ? - i SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 3 EXTEPoUL Dscarrccr repro PURCHASING/ BOM CIY ff5[RIPTICN o N n ?JV U?J $ as a 9 aZ ?oP"s„n I?Llf=lo ?aC3CJONJ? 4 NON STOCK ITEMS o m Ott VENDOR DESCRIPTION m FQy?Q(A 0 aF.? ?NLL N 2'-48° MISC NOTES: g? aNaND THIS DRAWING IS TH= PRJPcRiY OF UNITED SIGN SYSTEMS ALL RIGHTS TO ITS I)GE FOR . KIRRODUCTION ARE RESERVED BY DRAWING# U.S.S. TAMPA FL O LALE.203F OCT182002' F I L Fa COPY 0 0 • 0 I EXISTING ISLAND HEALTH AND FITNESS SIGN TO BE RELOCATED 34'-61/2" 35'-8" EACH WINDOW IS 82 SQ. FT. 16 SQ. FT. NEON USED =19.5% OF WINDOW SPACE SCALE 1/8" =1'-0" 1 PROPOSED 2'-1 1/4"X 8'-4 3/4" DOUBLE-FACED BLADE SIGN non 1 Unlted OUTBACK CLEARWATER, FL Sign B-21-02 1 Systems 0BCLFAAWATER,ELEV PH. 888-704-1516 DEA THIS DEAGN IS SUBMITTED AS PART OF OUR PROPOSAL AND LSTO REMAIN OUR PROPERTY EXCLUSIVELY UNTIL ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY PURCHASE. • • I I I I 1' kdO3 313 11 N f Zooz 8 130 F1? i CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 26, 2002 Mr. Jamie Butler C/O Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. 2202 North Westshore Boulevard, 5th Floor Tampa, Florida 33607 RE: Application for Flexible Standard Development application approval to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2- 802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. Dear Mr. Butler: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes a 6,300 square foot restaurant located within an existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. After a preliminary review b ed documents, staff has determined that the application is generally complete. The W t?rs been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS200 - 3. Please submit the following items/information by September 6, 2002: 1. Value of the project; 2. The location of the outdoor seating area (include number of tables and exact location of all tables and chairs); 3. Provide operating details of the outdoor seating (include how customers and staff will access the area, fencing, roping or other space delineating methods, etc.); and 4. Provide a full sign package including the area of the portion of the facade the business will occupy which faces Mandalay Avenue, the percentage of that area the sum of the area of all attached signs will constitute. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMAITVE ACTION EMPLOYER" August 26, 2002 Butler - Page Two The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on September 12, 2002 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. Please be aware that additional items and/or information may be required at or subsequent to that meeting. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. 7=--t? Lr Wayne Wells Senior Planner SAPlanning DepartmenAC D B\Standard FlexTending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Mandalay 483 Outback SteakhouseWandalay 483 Complete Letter.doc I . I / 0 &Z -- --- -- -- -- - - - - - 140 J?T - - - ---- -- - -- - - --- - -- -- ???. ---900-- -- - - --------- - i i 0 r,. e t • § 35.11 CLEARWATER CODE aA e4 Ar 4-1-11 be used as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreation or vacation use and when fac- tory-equipped for the road, having a body width not exceeding eight feet. (2) Pickup coach. A structure designed to be mounted on a truck chassis with suffi- cient equipment to render it suitable for use as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreation or vacation uses. (3) Motor home. A portable, temporary dwell- ing to be used for travel, recreation or vacation uses, constructed as an integral part of a self-propelled vehicle: (4) Camping trailer. A collapsible temporary dwelling structure covered with a water- repellent fabric, mounted on wheels and designed for travel, recreation or vacation uses. (5) Auto camper. A lightweight, collapsible unit that fits on top of an automobile and into the trunk with the cover removed, and designed for travel, recreation or va- cation uses. Recreational vehicle lot means a parcel of land in a recreational vehicle park reserved for the temporary placement of a recreational vehicle and reserved for the exclusive use of the occu- pants of such recreational vehicle. Recreational vehicle park means a parcel of land reserved for the location of recreational vehicles. Remote switching station means a totally en- closed utility facility housing telephone circuitry. Research and development facilities means lab- oratories or buildings the primary use of which is the research, testing and development of goods, materials, foodstuffs or products. Research and technology production uses means such uses as medical, optical and scientific re- search facilities, clinics and laboratories, pharma- ceutical compounding and photographic process- ing facilities and facilities for the assembly of electronic components, optical equipment, and precision instruments. Supp. No. 16 Residential shelter means a building, dwelling or portion thereof, the use of which is for a nonprofit service providing a place of temporary residence to homeless persons or families. For the purposes of density, one dwelling unit shall equal three persons housed on the premises. Restaurant means a business establishment providing for the preparation or sale of food or drink for consumption by customers on or off the premises, but excluding facilities for non-commer- cial and incidental food service within grocery stores and delicatessens. An establishment serv- ing alcoholic beverages shall be considered to be a restaurant if 51 percent or more of the gross sales receipts are for the sale of food and nonalcoholic beverages, if there are no package sales of alco- holic beverages, and if not more than 15 percent of the gross floor area of the establishment is devoted to waiting areas, lounges, entertainment areas, or other areas where alcoholic beverages are served but where any other menu items are not typically served. Retail complex means two or more retail uses containing a minimum cumulative floor area of 5,000 square feet located on the same property. In cases where more than two uses are located in a retail complex, not more than ten percent of the total gross floor area of the complex shall be devoted to restaurant, nightclub, tavern or bar; or package sales uses except as provided in sections 41.071 through 41.074. Runway means a defined area on an airport prepared for landing and takeoff of aircraft along its length. Same ownership means ownership by the same person, corporation, firm, entity, partnership, or unincorporated association. Setback means the horizontal distance be- tween a property line and a structure. Shopping center eans a group of five or more co 5m al establishments with an overall floor area of at least 25,000 square feet, such establish- ments being planned, designed, developed, owned and managed as a unit. loot more-tLh?vercen? o? e o a. CD35:14 5.o.c?l 1 s. ' " 0 0 GENERAL PROVISIONS § 35.11 Cshali M iev d ,_a ik% club;-a<ve n_ oFbar; or-pao a . ap s'?ons x:C? rou• . Shrubs means low-growing, self-supporting, woody, evergreen plants indigenous to the munic- ipal area which normally attain a height of at least 2.5 feet at maturity. Greater heights may be required under the terms of this development code depending upon the purpose that the shrubs are to serve. Sidewalk vendor means any person engaged in the selling, or offering for sale, or [of] food, bever- ages, merchandise or services for immediate de- livery from a vendor stand or from his or her person. Side property line means a property line which runs generally perpendicular or radial to the property line from which a property is addressed. Standard lot means any lot which is not a double frontage lot. Street means a public or private thoroughfare which affords the principal means of vehicular movement and access to abutting property. Street, collector means a street that collects traffic from local streets and connects with minor and major arterials. Street, local means a street designed to provide vehicular access to abutting property and to dis- courage through traffic. Street, major arterial means a street with ac- cess control, channelized intersections; restricted parking, and that collects and distributes traffic to and from lesser classified streets. Street, minor arterial means a street with signals at important intersections and stop signs on the side streets and that collects and distrib- utes traffic to and from local and collector streets. Structural alteration means any change in the supporting members of a building such as bearing walls or partitions; columns, beams or girders; or any structural change in the roof. Structure means any object permanently an- chored to the ground constructed or installed by man, including but not limited to buildings, ga- Supp. No. 16 rages, carports, flagpoles, stoops and utility build- ings. For the purpose of applying setback require- ments, aboveground swimming pools shall be considered to be structures. Subdivision means any division or redivision of land into two or more lots, tracts, sites or parcels for the purpose of transfer of ownership or build- ing development. The term "subdivision" shall also include any change of a property line of a lot, tract, site or parcel. Subdivision plat means a document (plat) dis- playing the manner in which land is to be subdi- vided prepared for recordation purposes which is drawn consistent with the terms of this develop- ment code and which, if approved according to the procedures contained in this development code, may be filed at the office of the clerk of the county court. Swimming pool means a tank or tub for swim- ming or wading. This term shall include jacuzzis, spas, whirlpools and the like. Temporary building means a building erected or placed as a nonpermanent installation de- signed to serve a temporary need related to con- struction, education or emergency housing pur- poses. Such temporary location or erection shall not exempt such building or structure from meet- ing all applicable requirements of the building code. Temporary retail sales and displays means any nonpermanent sales or displays which either ex- ist along with the permanent or principal use on property, exist independent of the permanent or principal use on property, or are associated with the permanent or principal use. As used in this development code, the term "temporary retail sales and displays" shall include carnivals and similar temporary amusement projects and shall exclude residential development sales office, land sales offices, and garage and yard sales. Townhouse building means a building which contains two or more townhouse units, each unit located on its own lot with individual title thereto and each lot possessing direct street access a- d requisite parking to serve the unit. CD35:15 • § 41.071 CLEARWATER CODE ARTICLE M. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE change of location, expansion of alco- SALES* holic beverage sales area, of change of business ownership for these uses. Se.c. 0 w Pckae; inn ica itv an ap- prova (1) Purpose. It is the purpose of this article to specify the applicable approval procedures for any new, change of location, expansion of alcoholic beverage sales area, change of business owner- ship, or change in type of use for alcoholic bever- age sales uses within the city. The requirements of this article supplement chapter 6 and all appli- cable provisions of state law. (2) Applicability and approval process. (a) For permitted uses. 1. Restaurants. A freestanding restau- rant meeting the definition of "restau- rant" in section 35.1 and allowed as permitted use in the applicable zoning district shall not be required to obtain conditional use permit approval for any new, change of location, expansion of alcoholic beverage sales area, or change of business ownership regard- less of whether the restaurant serves alcoholic beverages. Restaurants lo- cated in retail complexes, shopping cen- ters, and hotels/motels shall be gov- erned by the provisions of subsections 2. and (b) below. 2. Accessory uses. Alcoholic beverage sales establishments, including restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and pack- age sales uses may be considered ac- cessory uses under certain circum- stances as specified in section 41.072. In such cases, no conditional use per- mit shall be required for any new, *Editor's note-Ord. No. 5754-95, § 19, adopted Jan. 19, 1995, repealed former Art. III, which pertained to similar subject matter and enacted provisions designated as a new Art. III to read as herein set out. See the Code Comparative Table. Cross references-Alcoholic beverages generally, ch. 6; statement of zoning compliance from development code admin- istre.tor required for alcoholic beverage establishments, § 6.25. (b) For conditional uses. For restaurants, night- clubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses not classified as permitted uses, a conditional use permit shall be required for any new, change of location, expansion of alcoholic beverage sales area, or change of business ownership involving these uses subject to the applicable general or supple- mentary conditional use permit standards. For restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses that may otherwise qualify as accessory uses under section 41.072 but exceed the floor area limitations of that section, the following provisions apply: 1. Package sales uses located in freestand- ing retail establishments containing a minimum gross floor area of 25,000 square feet that exceed the five per- cent cumulative floor area limitation may be allowed upon approval of a conditional use permit by the planning and zoning board subject to the gen- eral and supplementary standards of approval as other package sales uses. 2. Restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses located in a retail complex and cumulatively oc- cupying over ten percent of the gross floor area of the retail complex may be allowed upon issuance of a conditional use permit by the planning and zoning board subject to the general and sup- plementary standards of approval for nightclubs, taverns and bars (for res- taurant or nightclub, tavern and bar uses) or for packages sales (for package sales uses). 3. Restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses located in shopping center and cumulatively oc- cupying over 15 percent of the gross floor area of the shopping center may be allowed upon issuance of a condi- tional use permit by the planning and zoning board subject to the general S:-.pp. No. 15 CD41:16.4 SPECIAL LAND USES § 41.072 and supplementary standards of ap- proval for nightclubs, taverns and bars (for restaurant or nightclub, tavern and bar uses) or for packages sales (for package sales uses). 4. Nightclubs, taverns and bars, and pack- age sales uses located in hotels/motels containing a minimum of 50 units and cumulatively occupying over 15 per- cent of the percent of the gross floor area of the hotel/motel may be allowed upon issuance of a conditional use per- mit by the planning and zoning board subject to the general and supplemen- tary standards of approval for the ap- plicable use. (Ord. No. 5754-95, § 19, 1-19-95; Ord. No. 5942, § 3,2-15-96) Sec. 41.072: Accessory uses. In zoning districts that allow indoor retail sales or hotels/motels as permitted or conditional uses, restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses may be considered accessory uses when located in freestanding retail establish- ments, retail complexes, shopping centers or hotels/ motels if the following requirements are met, and the use is not located within 200 feet of a church or school or there is no outdoor seating proposed where the service area is located within 200 feet of a residential zone. Under these circumstances, no conditional use permit shall be required, even if the use is listed as a conditional use in the applicable zoning district. If the use is located within 200 feet of a church or school or outdoor seating is proposed where the service area is located within 200 feet of a residential zone, a conditional use permit shall be required for any new, change of location, expansion of alcoholic beverage sales area, or change of business own- ership even if the use is otherwise eligible for consideration as an accessory use; such review shall be pursuant to the supplementary stan- dards of approval of section 41.053(27.1). Parking requirements for such alcoholic beverage sales uses iii freestanding retail establishments con- taining a minimum of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, in retail complexes, and in shopping centers shall be calculated as though the floor Supp. No. 14 area associated with the alcoholic beverage sales uses was devoted to the principal use of the building. For other alcoholic beverage sales uses regarded as accessory uses under the terms of this section, parking requirements shall be calcu- lated independently and shall be cumulative. (1) Package sales uses located in a freestand- ing retail establishment containing a min- imum of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area may be considered accessory uses if not more than five percent of the total floor area of the retail establishment is cumula- tively devoted to package sales alcoholic beverage sales floor area. (2) Restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses located in retail complexes may be considered accessory uses if the cumulative floor area devoted to all such uses in the retail complex does not exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the retail complex; parking requirements for these accessory uses shall be calculated. at the same space-to-floor-area basis as required for the retail complex. As an ex- ception to the above, package sales uses in retail complexes shall not be considered accessory uses in the north greenwood com- mercial, resort commercial or beach com- mercial districts. (3) Restaurants, nightclubs, taverns and bars, and package sales uses located in shopping centers may be considered accessory uses if the cumulative floor area devoted to all such uses in the shopping center does not exceed 15 percent of the gross floor area of the shopping center; parking requirements for these accessory uses shall be calculated on the same space-to-floor-area basis as required for the shopping center. (4) Nightclubs, taverns and bars and package sales uses located in hotels/motels contain- ing a minimum of 50 units may be consid- ered accessory uses if the cumulative floor area devoted to all such uses in the hotel/ motel does not exceed 1 5 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel/motel (Ord. No. 5754-95, § 19, 1-19-95; Ord. No. 5942, § 3,2-15-96) CD41:16.5 § 41.073 Sec. 41.073. Nonconformities. CLEARWATER CODE Nightclubs, taverns and bars and package sales uses existing on the effective date of Ordinance No. 5668-94 and nonconforming with the provi- sions of this article shall be required to obtain a conditional use permit for any change of business ownership. No change of location or expansion of alcoholic beverage sales area shall be permitted if Sec. 41.074. Alcoholic beverage use table. • such change of location or expansion of alcoholic beverage sales area increases the degree of non- conformity with this article unless such noncon- formity is specifically recognized and approved by the planning and zoning board in the granting of a conditional use permit. (Ord. No. 5754-95, § 19, 1-19-95) CH CC U DIMU IL RD ISP S/R Zoning District CN NG CB CR24 CR28 CG CI /C P Freestandin Restaurant ; /C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C C P/C C P/C C P/C C P C C C Freestanding Nightclub - C - - - C C C C C C C - Freestanding Package C C - - - C C (<25,000 SF) Freestanding Package° P/C P/C P/- P/- P/- P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C (225,000 SF) P/C P/C P/C P/C _ Retail Complex P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C (restaurant/bar) P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C _ Retail Complex P/C P/C - - - P/C P/C (package) /C P/C P/C P/C P/C _ Shopping Center (restaurant/bar/ k .) P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P P/C NC P/C P/C _ Hotel/Motel (restaurant/bar/pkg.) P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C KEY = Not allowed P = Permitted C =Conditional i No new nightclubs, taverns and bars or package sales uses. z No nightclubs, taverns and bars or package sales in Transition subdistrict. a Only in Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts. 4 Permitted if 5% or less of gross floor area; Conditional if more than 5%. 6 Permitted if cumulative alcoholic beverage sales area for complex is 10% or less of gross floor area; Conditional if over 10%; exce t that new bars are not allowed in retail complexes in the CNG, CB, CR24 and CR28 zones. s Permitted if cumulative alcoholic beverage sales area for center is 15% or less of gross floor area; Conditional if over 15% ' Permitted if cumulative alcoholic beverage sales area for hotel is 15% or less of gross floor area; Conditional if over 15%; 50 rooms minimum. (Ord. No. 5754-95, § 19, 1-19-95; Ord. No. 5942, § 3, 2-15-96) r Supp. No. 14 CD41:16.6 PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER - #2 a ?o UNIT TENANT USE SQ LOW HIGH MON. TUES. WED. THURS. FRI. SAT. SUN. F PARK (A) PARK (B 101-105 III-each Indoor 34 14 17 loam- loam- loam- loam- loam- loam- IOam- Gamela Rec. 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m lam lam 10 m 106-108 Gov. User "3300 . / . 13 16 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed (C) Bch 5pm Spm 5pm 5pm 5pm Library 109 e s Rest. 0 8 .10 11 am- llam- Ilam- IIam- Ilam- IIam- Ilam- Gyros I o pm I o pm I o pm I o pm I o pm I opm I o pm 111 egendary Retail C0 0 4 5 11 am- I I am- 1 I am- I 1 am- 11 am- 11 am- Closed Cigar 1 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 112 urf City Retail 00 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9 m 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 113 oly Gov. Use 900 4 5 IOam- IOam- IOam- loam- loam- loam- IOam- T lO m lO m lO m IO m lO m lO m IO m 114 (D Serious Retail 00 4 5 l Oam- l oam= l oam- 1 oam- l oam- 1 oam- 1Oam- Cookie IOpm IOpm IOpm IOpm 12am 12am 12am QCo 115-11 ack Rest. 630 . 44 95 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- E 1I pm II pm 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 20](F ) urger -Ling Rest. 954 12 15 206 "Xvailable G '11500' _ 6 8 207 Available G t 900 4 5 208(H) Clrwtr Gov. Use :900 4 5 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Police 209 Sharmaine Retail 900 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Hair/Nail 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm m 210 Viewpoint Office 1200 5 6 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed Realt Sm Sm Sm Sm Sm 211 Available G 900 4 5 212 Available G . 900 a 4 5 213 Available (G) 900 4 5 214-215 iku Rest. 2700 11 14 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- Spm- Closed 10 m 10 m 10 m lo pm 11 m 11 m 220 Island Indoor 4652 19 23 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 am- 5:30 8am- 8am- Health & Rec. am- am- am- IOpm am- 6pm 5pm Fitness 10 m lO m lO m 10 m TOTAL: 37,184 172 254 EXISTING SPACES: 101 101 TOTAL UNDERPARKED: 71 153 (A) Low Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Government Use: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 7 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 4 spaces/1,000 sf (B) High Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Government Use: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 15 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 5 spaces/1,000 sf (C) Tenant may be leaving - Lease runs out 12/31/02 (D) Proposed Tenant- Submitted OCL on 10/31/02 (Retail sales take out only) (E) Proposed Tenant - Submitted FLS2002-08063 (F) Closed for remodeling (G) For purposes of Parking Study, assumed to be used for Retail Sales (H) Tenant leaving near end of January; no set hours; police substation V ??w y ?''' YY// ?` ? • Clearwater City Final Agenda Item # 9'??YgTE Commission Aril 3, 2003 Agenda Cover Meeting Date: P Memorandum SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached terms in the Letter of Intent and direct the Administration and Legal Department to develop a final contract for the construction of a 300-space public parking garage ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Last year the City Commission directed City Administration to negotiate with the Pelican Walk property owner to develop a joint public/private approach for construction of a parking garage on the Pelican Walk site. Since that time the City and it's consultants have conducted a demand analysis and numerous alternatives for garage facilities ranging from 200 to 450 spaces. City Administration has briefed the Commission and sought policy direction on a number of occasions as staff has continued to negotiate with the Pelican Walk property owner. As a result of this effort, City Administration and the Pelican Walk property owner have reached agreement on the terms of construction of a 300-space parking garage. The terms of this agreement are reflected in the attached "Term Sheet" that has been signed by the Pelican Walk property owner. These terms are as follows: 1. The Pelican Walk property owner will construct, own and operate a 300-space parking garage. 2. The garage will open to the public on a first come, first serve basis for a minimum of 30 years. 3. The rates in the garage may be no higher than other Florida resort locations and in no case more than 150% of the city's rate or $3.75 per hour, whichever is greater. 4. The minimum hours of operation will be from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. 5. The garage will be designed for a minimum life of 30 years. 6. The garage will be designed to accommodate an additional two levels for future parking. 7. The garage will be designed in accordance with Beach By Design guidelines. 8. The garage design will be required to achieve a quality appearance. 9. The city will employ an "owner's representative" to review the design and construction of the garage. Reviewed by- Originating Dept: Costs $1,400 000 Legal Info Tech NA Economic Development , Total Budget ?J e? Public Works User'I5ep4. ?d _cf Funding Source: Purchasing NA DCM/ACM ` Economic Development CapAol Improvement Current Fiscal Year Risk Mgmt NA Othe r Attachments Operating Letter of Intent Other X Parking System Fund Map Submitted by: rifi, Mnnnnnr ? None Appropriation Code: %; Printed on recycled paper 2/98 Rev.. t . 10. The city shall have the I t to review and approve the plans and specifications for the garage. 11. The Pelican Walk owner will commence construction within 12 months of approval of the detailed contract. 12. The garage will be maintained in a first class condition. 13. The city will provide an economic incentive of $1,400,000 to the Pelican Walk owner to construct the garage. 14. The city agrees to enforce parking violations in the vicinity of the garage. 15. The city will disburse the city funds in the following order: 100% of the cost of the design upon demonstration of the completion of the design; disbursement of the remaining funds in conjunction with each one third completion of the construction of the garage. 16. The city agrees not to participate in or construct additional public parking spaces within 1000 feet of the parking garage for a period of five years or until the parking garage meets the definition of "stabilized revenue". This is defined in the letter of intent. Exception to these restrictions relates to the city's participation in the development of a resort in accordance with the provisions of Beach By Design. 17. Should the city desire to build additional parking within one thousand feet of the garage in the first five years, the Pelican Walk owner will have sixty days to exercise the right to construct up to 200 spaces at Pelican Walk. If the owner declines the city has the right to construct the spaces it desires within 1000 feet of the garage. As the Commission is aware the city has struggled for more than five years to define locations and reasonable funding alternatives for additional public parking on both north and south Clearwater Beach. Beach By Design identified the future need for two locations on north beach and two locations of south beach. The Pelican Walk garage would be the first of these to be constructed. Pros a. Three hundred new public parking spaces will be provided on north beach b. These spaces will assist in the redevelopment of the Mandalay Street commercial corridor. c. These spaces will provide additional parking for beach goers. d. The city will not have to fully fund, own, operate and assume the liability of the facility. e. An opportunity exists to add 200 spaces to the garage at no expense to the city. f. The private sector will assume the revenue risk associated with the garage. g. The garage improvements and land will remain on the tax roll. Cons a. The.city will not own or control the garage. b. Should the garage "cash flow" the city would not benefit from these revenues. c. -"here will be a short durq& during which the city will be re?ted from building additional public parking within 1000 et of the garage, unless associate with a major resort project. d. The location is not the most efficient location for beach goers. e. The city will commit a "one time" financial commitment of $1.4 million dollars to assist in the design and construction of the garage. A number of city departments have participated in the effort to evaluate and develop new parking facilities on the beach. These include Economic Development, Public Works, Finance and Legal. Each of these departments have reviewed the Letter of,Intent and supports this approach. Finance has reviewed the economic impact of the financial commitment and indicates that there will be adequate retained earnings in the Parking System Fund. Attached you will find a map that illustrates the location of the 1000 foot radius that was explained earlier. 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 CITY HALL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4040 FAx (727) 562-4052 CITY MANAGER March 19, 2003 Mr. Louis Anastasopoulos B. J. E., Inc. Clearwater, Florida Re: Pelican Walk Garage Dear Mr. Anastasopoulos: This Letter of Intent sets forth the intentions of the City of Clearwater ("City") and B. J. E., Inc. ("Pelican Walk"), the owner of certain real property on Clearwater Beach popularly known as the Pelican Walk Shopping Center with regard to the proposed design, construction and operation of a parking garage on that portion of the Pelican Walk Property which is currently improved and used as a surface parking lot. The City desires to: 1) promote the revitalization and redevelopment of the North Mandalay area of Clearwater Beach and recognizes that additional off-street parking open to the public is needed to support such revitalization and redevelopment, and 2) provide additional beach parking. Pelican Walk desires to improve and enhance the economic performance of the Pelican Walk Shopping Center and recognizes that additional off-street parking open to the public on the Pelican Walk Property will contribute to the economic viability of the Pelican Walk Shopping Center and other businesses in the immediate vicinity. The City and Pelican Walk agree that it would be in the best interests of the Parties to enter into a joint public private agreement for the provision of additional off- street parking open to the public on an equal, first come, first serve basis. To that end, the City and Pelican Walk have jointly considered alternative means by which additional parking spaces open to the public could be designed, constructed and operated on the Pelican Walk Property. The City and Pelican Walk have agreed that the most effective means of providing for additional off=street parking spaces open to the public is for the City in the public interest and for a public purpose is to make a financial grant in support of providing additional off-street parking spaces open to the public as an incentive for the revitalization and redevelopment of the North Mandalay area of Clearwater Beach and to provide additional beach parking. Such grant is contemplated on the following general BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER How HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" terms and conditions which would be the basis of the preparation of a formal agreement between the City and Pelican Walk: Pelican Walk shall design, construct and operate (or cause to be designed, constructed and operated) on the portion of the Pelican Walk Property currently improved as a surface parking lot a parking garage containing not less than three hundred (300) parking spaces. 2. Pelican Walk agrees that the parking spaces in the proposed parking garage will be open to the public on an equal, first come, first serve, for pay parking basis for as long as the property is used for retail shopping and parking purposes, or a period of thirty (30) years, whichever is longer. 3. Pelican Walk agrees that the parking rates charged the public for use of the parking spaces in the proposed parking garage shall be consistent with parking rates charged for structured parking in other resort locations in Florida and in no case greater than one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the average parking rate charged by the City for off-street parking on Clearwater Beach or $3.75 whichever is greater. 4. Pelican Walk agrees that the proposed parking garage shall be open to the public between the hours of 10:00AM and 9:OOPM, three hundred and sixty five (365) days of the year. 5. Pelican Walk agrees that the proposed parking garage will be designed and constructed to have a useful of life of not less than thirty (30) years. 6. Pelican Walk agrees that the proposed parking garage will be designed and constructed in a manner which would allow, in the future, the addition of at least two (2) additional levels of parking. 7. Pelican Walk agrees that the proposed parking garage will be designed in accordance with the requirements of Beach by Design and each and every code and regulation of the City. 8. Pelican Walk agrees that the proposed parking garage will be designed and constructed in a manner which will ensure that the garage does not adversely affect the appearance and community character of Clearwater Beach. 9. Pelican Walk understands that the City will employ an "owner's representative" for the purpose of representing the City's interest in the design and construction of the proposed parking garage and Pelican Walk agrees to allow the City's Owner Representative to have access to and participate in the design and construction processes. 2 0 0 10. Pelican Walk agrees that the City shall have the right to review and approve the plans and specifications for the proposed parking garage with regard to compliance with the terms and conditions of the joint public/private agreement between the Parties relative to the design, construction and operation of the proposed parking garage. 11. Pelican Walk agrees to commence construction of the proposed parking garage within twelve (12) months of the effective date of the formal joint public private agreement between the parties. 12. Pelican Walk agrees that the proposed parking garage will be maintained, operated and used in a manner consistent with other first class or high quality parking garages in the Tampa Bay region. 13. In consideration of the public purpose served by provision of at least three hundred (300) off-street parking spaces open to the public on an equal, first come, first serve basis in the North Mandalay area of Clearwater Beach, the City agrees to provide Pelican Walk with an economic incentive to induce Pelican Walk to provide off-street parking open to the public on an equal, first come, first serve basis in the form of a financial grant in the amount of one million and four hundred thousand dollars ($1,400,000.00). 14. The City understands that strict enforcement of municipal regulations governing on and off-street parking regulations in the immediate vicinity of the proposed parking garage is an important consideration on which Pelican Walk relies in its undertaking to design, construct and operate the proposed parking garage. 15. The City agrees to pay the grant to Pelican Walk subject to the provision of appropriate security to assure completion of the proposed parking garage according to the following: a. When the City approves the plans and specifications for the proposed parking garage, the City shall reimburse Pelican Walk for up to one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of preparing plans and specifications. b. The City shall pay the balance of the grant on a progress payment basis, with one third of the balance of the total grant after reimbursement of the design costs being paid upon a demonstration that the construction of the proposed parking garage is one third (33%) complete, two thirds (66%) complete and substantially (100%) complete. 16. The City understands that the financial viability of the proposed garage could be adversely affected by the construction of additional off-street parking open 3 to the public in the immediate vicinity of the proposed garage if such spaces were made available prior to the time that the proposed parking garage achieves an annual occupancy of at least sixty-five percent (650/o), determined on the basis of the average number of hours the parking spaces in the garage are occupied, divided by the number of spaces multiplied times the number of hours per day (4) during which the proposed parking garage is required to be open times three hundred and sixty five (365) days. (X)(Y)(365) _ (.65)( HTot); where X = Avg. no. of hours of occupancy per day per space Y = No. of spaces in garage HTot = (Y)(365)(4) In consideration thereof, during the first five (5) years after the proposed parking garage is completed, the City agrees that in the event that the City determines that additional public parking is needed within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed garage, Pelican Walk shall have a first right of refusal to provide two hundred (200) additional. parking spaces at Pelican Walk's expense and to achieve an annual occupancy of sixty-five percent (65%) for the total number of parking spaces in the garage including the additional spaces prior to the construction of any additional parking spaces within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed parking garage with municipal funds, except as otherwise expressly provided for in these terms and conditions. The City agrees to give Pelican Walk written notice of its determination that additional public parking spaces are needed and that Pelican Walk shall have sixty (60) days to advise the City of its intention to construct an additional two hundred spaces in the proposed parking garage. If Pelican Walk fails to timely advise the City of its intention to construction additional spaces, the City shall be free to use municipal funds to construct additional spaces in the area within the one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed parking garage. Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph, the City retains the right to construct additional public parking spaces within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed parking garage where the additional the parking spaces are a necessary element of a destination resort development undertaken in accordance with the provisions of Beach by Design. 4 The Parties understand and agree that this. Letter of Intent, reflects agreement of the Parties, but that none of the rights and obligations described in the Letter of Intent shall be binding or enforceable until such rights and obligations have been incorporated into a formal agreement which is approved by resolution of the City in accordance the requirements of the City's Charter and Code of Ordinances and State Law. Very truly yours, Assistant rty Manager ACCEPTED: B. J. E., c 5 F RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT F ol TIME 02/20/2003 15:23 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATEJIME 02/20 15:22 FAX NO./NAME 4052 DURATION 00:00:58 PAGE(S) 02 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE AT PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1.) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The site is an existing mixed-use shopping center on Mandalay Ave. Outback Steakhouse intends on remodeling space previously occupied by a grocery store. The remodel plans will be in harmony with the present architecture of the building. 2.) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The construction of our restaurant should encourage additional development in the area and should help property values as we will be taking vacant space and turning it into a productive use. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or person residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The restaurant will not be engaged in any activity that will adversely affect the general public. 4.) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Parking for the restaurant is at the rear of the center and will create no additional congestion on Mandalay Ave. The existing site has 101 parking spaces in the rear of the building and there are an additional 270 public parking spaces within a 1000' radius to the site. The City of Clearwater intends to replace the 101 parking spaces in the rear of the building with a 450 space parking garage. Our operation is typically dinner only; therefore the daytime traffic impact will be minimal. 5.) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Outback Steakhouse's addition to the shopping center on Mandalay Ave. will be consistent with the mixed use of retail, restaurant, and government/office uses already present on this street. The fagade of the restaurant will be designed to maintain the community character of the center as it presently exists. 6.) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The facade of the restaurant will be designed to blend in with the existing building to provide a visually pleasing effect. The restaurant will comply with all codes and or ordinances relating to acoustic or olfactory concerns. Our hours of operation are typically during dinner hours (4 to 11 PM) and should not impact neighboring residents or businesses. Address all applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested. The Pelican Walk Shopping Center is located in a Tourist Zoning District. The site is on the North end of Clearwater Beach in an area that is presently undergoing significant redevelopment. With the addition of our restaurant to this shopping center, the site will be underparked by approximately 90 spaces. However, with the existing and proposed hotel, residential, and office uses in the immediate vicinity, and the pedestrian friendly nature of the surrounding area, the availability of additional public parking facilities, and the planned construction of a new City owned parking garage behind the building, we ask that a request for a code parking reduction be granted. It is also the feeling of the Planning and Zoning staff that patio dining be provided for to blend in with the redevelopment of Mandalay Ave. We would like to accommodate and ask for approval for patio dining. CASE NO: FLS2002-08063 6 DRC MEETING: SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT `?C?JhGZ? BACKGROUND INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Jamie Butler PROPERTY LOCATION: 483 Mandalay Avenue REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development application approval to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned anti committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject-site under the provisions of Section 2-9,02.0 and the l?ctail?' and Restaurant District of Beach byDe.?i n. ZONING: T, Tourist District EXISTING USE: Retail sales and service, office and restaurant ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Retail and restaurant South: Retail East: West: Retail and restaurant Page 1 0 0 STAFF ANALYSIS: The 1.69-acre site fronts on, but does not take access to, Mandalay Avenue. The site also has frontage on Poinsetta Avenue to the east, where all parking is. accessed from. This site is within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. Commercial uses dominate the surrounding area. An Outback Restaurant is proposed to locate within the Pelican Walk Shopping Center. The Outback Restaurant will locate on the north side of the first floor of this shopping center. Modifications that will be made to the shopping center building to accommodate the restaurant include the relocation and narrowing of the northern corridor that provides pedestrian access from the parking on the east side to the shop fronts on the west side. Building modifications, including all new construction or remodeling, will need to match the existing exterior color and materials of the building. The existing building has been certified as being flood proofed in the event of a storm. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the exterior building additions/remodeling will need to be certified as flood proofed to the 11 feet base flood elevation. A proposed 10-foot by 15-foot screened equipment area at the northeast corner of the building will need to be revised on the site plan prior to the issuance of a building permit to clearly indicate details, acceptable to the Planning Department. Screening will need to match the existing building in material and color. An outdoor cafe of seven tables and 28 seats is proposed fronting on, but not located on, the public sidewalk along Mandalay Avenue. The site is located within a transitional area between a commercially developed area along North Myrtle Avenue and single-and multi-family dwellings to the east. Uses along North Myrtle Avenue to the north, south and west include governmental uses (Gas Department and storage yard), medical clinic and single-family dwellings. The site is moderately treed and slopes slightly to the east. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot with the west and south property lines fronting along North Myrtle Avenue and Hart Street (one way, east-bound street), respectively. The proposal includes a 13,250 square foot,' two-story office building. The building Mll finished with traditional, colonial style architecture with a red brick and light sand wood-li siding. The building will also include green shutters and a dark, asphalt shingle roof. T building` wilt have a residential appearance. Access will be provided along North Myr avenue via a single ingress/egress driveway. A second ingress/egress point will be provid along Hart Street in addition to a one-way drop-off area approximately 20 feet east of Non Myrtle Avenue. The building will be located 27 feet from the front (west) property line ado North Myrtle Avenue and 25 feet from the front (south.) property line along Hart Street. T irking lot will be located five feet from the side (east and north) property lines The site will be improved with extensive landscaping which exceeds the intent of Code along; al ?roperty lines. A tiered effect will be provided along both street frontages along North MyrtI Avenue anal Hart Street to include a variety of flowering g roundcovers, shrubs and trees. A tat hedae in addition to u six-foot vinvI fence will provide an adequate buffer to the `residents Page 2 • • roperties to the east. The proposal will serve as an appropriate transitional use from the mord 1onu-nercially developed properties alon-Nrth Myrtle Avenue and the residential uses to th rast A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN I THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-701.1):"i STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? FAR 0.55 0.52 0.52* Yes IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.871 * 0.871* Yes SURFACE RATIO * No increase per applicant. Page 3 • • B. FLEXIBILITY STANDARDS FOR RESTAURANTS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-703): STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? LOT SIZE 5,000 - 10,000 73,700 square 73,700 square Yes minimum square feet feet feet LOT WIDTH 50-100 feet East: 350 feet East: 350 feet Yes (minimum) West: 300 feet West: 300 feet HEIGHT 25-35 feet 30 feet 30 feet Yes maximum PARKING Restaurant: 7- 101 spaces 105 spaces Yes* SPACES 15/1000 GFA; minimum Retail: 4-5/1000 GFA; Offices/Govern ment: 3-4/1000 GFA FRONT 10-15 feet East: five feet to East: five feet Yes SETBACK pavement to pavement West: zero feet to West: zero feet building to building SIDE 0-10 feet North: zero feet North: zero feet Yes SETBACK to building; 21 to building; 21 feet to pavement feet to South: zero feet pavement to building; five South: zero feet feet to pavement to building; five feet to pavement REAR 10-20 feet N/A** N/A** Yes** SETBACK * Utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of subject site. ** Through lots have two front setbacks and two side setbacks under the provisions of Section 3-903. Page 4 • • C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESTAURANTS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-802): 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The Flexible Standard requirement for restaurants is 5,000 - 10,000 square feet of lot area and a lot width of 50 - 100 feet. The subject parcel is 73,700 square feet in area and has 300 feet of lot width on Mandalay Avenue and 350 feet of lot width on Poinsetta Avenue. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The subject parcel fronts on, but does not take access to, Mandalay Avenue. The parking lot takes access to Poinsetta Avenue, a local street, on the east side of the property. 3. Height. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance: (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The existing two-story building is 30 feet in height. The proposed restaurant is on the first floor of the existing building. There is no proposed increase in the height of the existing building. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The proposed restaurant will only utilize window and wall signage and will not have any freestanding signage. All proposed and relocated signage must meet Code requirements. 5. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The restaurant is proposed to locate within an existing building on the ground floor, which currently is at a zero front setback from Mandalay Avenue. There is no proposed reduction in the front setback over that which presently exists. The applicant is proposing to add an Page 5 outdoor cafe, located on the subject parcel and not extending out onto the sidewalk within Mandalay Avenue. Page 6 0 • b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The restaurant is proposed to locate within an existing building on the ground floor, which currently is at a zero front setback from Mandalay Avenue. There is no proposed reduction in the front setback over that which presently exists. The proposed revisions to the exterior of the building will match the existing building design and color. c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The restaurant is proposed to locate within an existing building on the ground floor, which currently is at a zero side setback (north and south sides). There is no proposed reduction in the side setback over that which presently exists. Any emergency vehicles would either stop within Mandalay Avenue or park within the parking lot at the rear of the building, accessed from Poinsetta Avenue. d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The restaurant is proposed to locate within an existing building on the ground floor, which currently is at a zero side setback from Mandalay Avenue. There is no proposed reduction in the side setback over that which presently exists. e. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The restaurant is proposed to locate within an existing building on the ground floor, which currently is at a zero side setback from Mandalay Avenue. There is no proposed reduction in the side setback over that which presently exists. 6. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes; ote: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) While the numb spaces are being reduced from the minimum number required (53 spaces) t1 is Page 7 • humber. of parking spaces to be reduced by tip to 25 percent in order to preservd rotected trees Located on the pa -celnmoposed foi developxnei as identified by the City's Land Resource Specialist. The proposal includes reducing the number of parking spaces by 10 percent or four spaces in order to preserve two live oaks, a 27-inch tree and 30-inch tree protected trees. b. Adequate off-street parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Division 14; (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) c. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the number of off- street parking spaces. (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The subject restaurant is not considered a fast food restauant. 7. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. (Note: The applicant did not submit a response to this criteria.) The proposed revisions to the exterior of the building will match the existing building in design and color. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed restaurant is located within an existing mixed-use shopping center on Mandalay Avenue. The restaurant is proposed on the first floor of the existing 38,181 square-foot, two-story Pelican Walk Shopping Center. The proposal includes converting existing commercial space for the restaurant and relocating a walkway through the building further south to accommodate the restaurant construction. The applicant indicates there will be no increase in floor area with this restaurant and, as such, the overall scale and bulk of the shopping center will not change. Exterior modifications to the building will match the existing building in color and materials. An on-site outdoor cafe for 28 seats is proposed. The proposal is in harmony with surrounding properties. Page 8 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings, or `significantly impair the value thereof. The site is zoned Tourist District and the- proposed use: will be in compliance with that zoning. The restaurant is proposed.,within an, `existing shopping center that fronts on Mandalay Avenue. The existing building' is located with a zero front (west) setback along Mandaly Avenue and a zero side (north and ? south) setback. Parking for this shopping center is to the east of the building,,.accessed from Poinsetta Avenue. The subject parcel is located within a commercial area that has other commercial businesses, including other restaurants. There are other restaurants within the subject shopping center. As such, the proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposal is for the inclusion of an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant within an existing shopping center. There will be sufficient parking within the vicinity to meet the parking requirements of this shopping center, including the new restaurant. Modifications to the building will match the existing color and materials of the existing building. The development will not negatively affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The restaurant is proposed on the first floor of the existing Pelican Walk Shopping Center. The shopping center fronts on, but does not take access to, Mandalay Avenue. All on-site parking is on the east side of the shopping center accessed from Poinsetta Avenue. There are no proposed changes to points of access. The property presently has 101 parking spaces. The applicant proposes to increase on-site parking to 105 spaces. Sufficient parking will be available on-site and within 1,000 feet to accommodate this proposed restaurant as well as other uses within the vicinity. There will be greater competition for public parking. There is additionally a proposal to construct a City parking garage on the east side of the shopping center replacing the surface parking lot. The City Manager's office has assured the Planning Department that this proposed parking garage will be constructed. A parking garage would provide additional parking for the beach, for both on-site businesses as well as for businesses in the vicinity. During construction of the parking garage, with no on-site parking available, parking will be constrained and there will be traffic congestion. Construction of the proposed parking garage has been considered prior to the potential of the Outback Restaurant locating within this shopping center. Page 9 • • 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Outback Restaurant is proposed to locate on the first floor of an existing shopping center. The surrounding area can be characterized as commercial, with a number of restaurants located on the subject parcel or within close proximity. Modifications proposed to the existing building will match in color and materials. The applicant also proposes an on-site outdoor cafe as part of this restaurant. Outdoor cafes are common in this beach community. The proposed restaurant is consistent with the character of the area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed restaurant is a dinner only restaurant, generally open seven days a week from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Peak hours are from about 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. There are two existing dumpsters on-site within dumpster enclosures. Offensive odors associated with dumpster trash or offensive views of excessive trash overflowing the dumpsters can be resolved by increasing the frequency of pickup of the dumpsters. Modifications to the building for the restaurant will be consistent with the color and materials of the existing building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the application, the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Standard Development approval, with the maximum development potential and with all applicable standards of the Community Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design at 483 Mandalay Avenue, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the restaurant criteria of Section 3-802.0; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area; and 4. Adequate parking for this restaurant will be available within close proximity to the subject property. Conditions of Approval: 1. That tables, chairs, umbrellas and any other fixture used in conjunction with the outdoor caf6 be maintained in a clean and attractive appearance and be in good repair at all times; Page 10 2. That all nonpermanent fixtures, as well as tables and chairs, be removed from the entire outdoor cafe area in the case of an extreme wind event; 3. That the outdoor cafe area, including an area five feet beyond, be maintained in a neat and orderly appearance at all times and be cleared of all debris on a periodic basis during the day and at the close of each business day; 4. That all new construction or remodeling match the existing exterior color and materials of the building; 5. That the site plan be revised to meet Code requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit with regard to the number and location of all handicap parking spaces and required building access, and the site plan show the location of all reserved or dedicated parking spaces; 6. That the site plan be revised prior to`lthe issuance of a building permit to clearly indicate details, acceptable to the Planning Department, of the proposed 10-foot by 15-foot screened equipment area on the northeast corner of the building. Screening shall match the existing building in material and color; 7. That prior to the issuance of a. building permit the exterior building additions/remodeling be certified as flood proofed to the 11 feet base flood elevation; 8. That proposed or relocated signage meet Code requirements; S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRCIMandalay 483 Outback SteakhouselMandalay 483 Report. doc Page 11 Care) ? .,-4.,.'?1' Pig!-Q.? ? ?ra. ??3 ?N.ol ? © t,1It-i, N-e 44v- 3 r-%.C?4s bQ", ??• ???d Otdio.?c- RX-S f O'n -se'l l " , 1 7 - S---AA AAV t Gu ?b A f4,&- IN UM-v *?,?l at Pr IbV'a, el q- AA ---=? 10 N , Mq.? W/?T T-hF-l Rwu UTz.? It- cam- 6AS a , f l ? ?? `? It amp afa? . • • tm r --f- Ger - - ?4&6- LOA A-&-9k?7 i ?u'Orb TA wl__? S f?Yy_nuy_Lra grmaz 0 0 ot otqftK S cm, C a? Ct-7 1?7glp? h2td' LAJ t6C , 1 -1Z? `b -U s0? -UAXM?L -T i i? ? ?IC6f`'1?CS ??ll/o? 1.0 IVD 41 ?--3 - 7 Liz 3- Y- - Rm-iq- 7#q -M hWp6kJ NOD I li Gc? w/c?s?U?iuo? ve-M 1E uf)u-, Grre, 0 • PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER 71 UNIT TENANT USE SQ LOW HIGH MON. TUES. WED. THURS. FRI. SAT. SUN. FTG PARKA PARK B 101-105 Beach Indoor 3478 35 35 loam- loam- loam= IOam- loam- IOam- loam- Gameland Rec. 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m lam 1 am ' 10 m 106-108 Clrwtr Gov. Use 3300 10 13 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed (C) Bch 5pm 5pm 5pm 5pm 5pm Library 109 Theo's Rest. 2100 15 31 11 am- Ilam- IIam- IIam- IIam- IIam- IIam- Gyros lOm IOm IOm IOm IOm IOm IOm' 111 Legendary Retail 900 4 5 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- Closed Cigars 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 112 Surf City Retail 900 4 5 9am-. 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am= 9 m 9 pm 9 m 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 113 Jolly Gov. Use 900 3 4 l Oam- l oam- l oam- l oam- loam- l oam- 1 Oam- Trolly IOm IOm lOm' IOm' 10m IOm IOm 114 (D) Serious Retail 900 4 5 loam- loam- loam- loam- loam- IOam- l0am- Cookie IOpm IOpm lOpm, IOpm 12am 12am 12am Co 115-118 Outback Rest. 6300 44 95 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- E Steakhse 11 m 11 m I1 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 201(F) Burger Rest. 2954 21 44 Kin 206 Available G 1500 5 6 207 Available G 900 3 4 208(H) Clrwtr Gov. Use 900 3 4 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Police 209 Sharmaine Retail 900 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Hair/Nail 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 m m 210 Viewpoint Office 1200 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed Realty Sm Sm Sm Sm Sm 211 Available G 900 3 4 212 Available G 900 3 4 213 Available (G) 900 3 4 214-215 Kiku Rest. 2700 15 40 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- Closed Japanese IOm IOm IOm IOm 11 m 11 m: 220 Island Indoor 4652 47 47 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 am-, 5:30 8am- 8am- Health & Rec. am- am- am- lOpm am- '. 6pm 5pm Fitness lo pm 10 m 10 m 10 m' TOTAL: 37,184 230 360 EXISTING SPACES: 101 101 TOTAL UNDERPARKED: 129 259 (A) Low Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 10 spaces/ 1,000 sf Government Use: 3 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 7 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 3 spaces/1,000 sf (B) High Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 10 spaces/ 1,000 sf Government Use: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 15 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 4 spaces/1,000 sf (C) Tenant may be leaving - Lease runs out 12/31/02 (D) Proposed Tenant - Submitted OCL on 10/31/02 (Retail sales - take out only) (E) Proposed Tenant - Submitted FLS2002-08063 (F) Closed for remodeling (G) For purposes of Parking Study, assumed to be used for Offices or Government Use (H) Tenant leaving near end of January; no set hours; police substation S, W:1 -vOvr CA- qwv?'? "--'_ o ,? Ib Iti C.K. • I PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER - #2 1 UNIT TENANT USE SQ LOW HIGH MON. TUES. WED. THURS. FRI. SAT. SUN. FTG PARK (A) PARK (B) 101-105 Beach Indoor 3478 14 17 loam- loam- IOam- loam- loam- IOam- IOam- Gameland Rec. 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m lam 1 am lo pm 106-108 Clrwtr Gov. Use 3300 13 16 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed (C) Bch 5pm 5pm 5pm 5pm 5pm Library 109 Theo's Rest. 2100 8 10 11 am- IIam- llam- Ilam- IIam- Ilam- llam- Gyros lOm IOm lOm IOm IOm IOm lOm 111 Legendary Retail 900 4 5 11 am- 11 am- 1 I am- 11 am- 11 am- 1 I am- Closed Cigars 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 112 Surf City Retail 900 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9 m 9 m 9 m 9 m 9 m 9 pm 9 m 113 Jolly Gov. Use 900 4 5 l0am- loam- IOam- IOam- loam- 1Oam- l0am- Trolly IOm IOm lOm IOm IOm lOm IOm 114 (D) Serious Retail 900 4 5 l oam- 1 oam- I Oam- l oam- loam- l oam- 1Oam- Cookie lOpm IOpm IOpm IOpm 12am 12am 12am Co 115-118 Outback Rest. 6300 44 95 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- E Steakhse 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m I1 m 201(F) Burger Rest. 2954 12 15 Kin 206 Available G 1500 6 8 207 Available G) 900 4 5 208(H) Clrwtr Gov. Use 900 4 5 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Police 209 Sharmaine Retail 900 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Hair/Nail 4m 4m 4m 4m 4m 4m m 210 Viewpoint Office 1200 5 6 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed Realty 5m Spm Sm Sm Sm 211 Available G 900 4 5 212 Available G 900 4 5 213 Available (G) 900 4 5 214-215 Kiku Rest. 2700 11 14 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- Closed Japanese 10 m 10 m lo pm 10 m 11 m 11 m 220 Island Indoor 4652 19 23 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 am- 5:30 8am- 8am- Health & Rec. am- am- am- I Opm am- 6pm 5pm Fitness 10 m 10 m 10 m lo pm TOTAL: 37,184 172 254 EXISTING SPACES: 101 101 TOTAL UNDERPARKED: 71 153 (A) Low Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Government Use: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 7 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 4 spaces/1,000 sf (B) High Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Government Use: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 15 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 5 spaces/1,000 sf (C) Tenant may be leaving - Lease runs out 12/31/02 (D) Proposed Tenant - Submitted OCL on 10/31/02 (Retail sales - take out only) (E) Proposed Tenant - Submitted FLS2002-08063 (F) Closed for remodeling (G) For purposes of Parking Study, assumed to be used for Retail Sales (H) Tenant leaving near end of January; no set hours; police substation 0 • ---] PELICAN WALK SHOPPING CENTER #1 UNIT TENANT USE SQ LOW HIGH MON. TUES. WED. THURS. FRI. SAT. SUN. FTG PARK A) PARK B) 101-105 Beach Indoor 3478 35 35 loam- loam- loam- loam- loam- loam- IOam- Gameland Rec. 11 m 11 m l l m 11 m 1 am lam 10 m 106-108 Clrwtr Gov. Use 3300 10 13 gam- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed (C) Bch 5pm 5pm 5pm 5pm 5pm Library 109 Theo's Rest. 2100 15 31 1lam- IIam- llam- IIam- IIam- llam- Ilam- Gyros lOm IOm IOm IOm IOm IOm IOm 111 Legendary Retail 900 4 5 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- 11 am- Closed Cigars 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 112 Surf City Retail 900 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9 m 9 m 9 m 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 113 Jolly Gov. Use 900 3 4 l Oam- l oam- l oam- l0am- l oam- l oam- 1 Oam- Trolly lOm IOm IOm IOm IOm IOm IOm 114(D) Serious Retail 900 4 5 l oam- l oam- l oam- l oam- 1 oam- 1 oam- 1Oam- Cookie IOpm IOpm IOpm IOpm 12am 12am 12am Co 115-118 Outback Rest. 6300 44 95 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- 4pm- E Steakhse 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 11 m 201(F) Burger Rest. 2954 21 44 Kin 206 Available G 1500 5 6 207 Available (G 900 3 4 208(H) Clrwtr Gov. Use 900 3 4 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Police 209 Sharmaine Retail 900 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Hair/Nail 4 m 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 pm 4 m m 210 Viewpoint Office 1200 4 5 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- 9am- Closed Closed Realty Sm Sm Sm Sm Sm 211 Available G 900 3 4 212 Available G 900 3 4 213 Available (G) 900 3 4 214-215 Kiku Rest. 2700 15 40 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- 5pm- Closed Ja anese 10 m 10 m 10 m lo pm 11 m 11 m 220 Island Indoor 4652 47 47 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 am- 5:30 8am- 8am- Health & Rec. am- am- am- lOpm am- 6pm 5pm Fitness IO m lo pm lo pm 10 m TOTAL: 37,184 230 360 EXISTING SPACES: 101 101 TOTAL UNDERPARKED: 129 259 (A) Low Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 10 spaces/1,000 sf Government Use: 3 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 7 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 3 spaces/1,000 sf. (B) High Parking Ratio: Indoor Recreation/Entertainment: 10 spaces/1,000 sf Government Use: 4 spaces/1,000 sf Restaurant: 15 spaces/1,000 sf Retail Sales: 5 spaces/1,000 sf Office: 4 spaces/1,000 sf (C) Tenant may be leaving - Lease runs out 12/31/02 (D) Proposed Tenant - Submitted OCL on 10/31/02 (Retail sales - take out only) (E) Proposed Tenant - Submitted FLS2002-08063 (F) Closed for remodeling (G) For purposes of Parking Study, assumed to be used for Offices or Government Use (H) Tenant leaving near end of January; no set hours; police substation L..3412South Dale Mabry Highway PROPE:ITY Tampa, FL 33629 E - I\IaII: t hepros@propertypro.com ..., :.?:: allA web:www.prope-typro.com 813-835-7747 813-839-3299 Fax PELICAN WALE` SHOPPING CENTER 483 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 UNIT TENANT SQUARE FOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR loac. !o P?`t S•..dw 101-105 JBeach Gameland 4117- 154% y p 44 3478 pry - C- 106-108 CleSarwSater?B?each Library 3300 (Avail. 1/1/03) 109 iTheo's Gyros 4 to I -tit 44 2100 14 - to On e64,, j 111 112 113 114 115-118 SECOND FLOOR 201 206 207 208 209 a b 210 211 JLegendary Cigars 441- 3 7U 1% - % Pr% M- 504 . JSurf City +66- 6'77-f 9or?- 9 e«. Ev4,ry.1.a.? V'JoliyTrolly c}4s-'1-LOb 1? Ath - l0 4'•t `? E.,e,y day JAVAILABLE 5or-; ovi G41, e. Crwv lbts-3`1 f- 34b3 Outback Steakhouse 900 900 900 900 o oe \\ -4h I o Pre H--I'\\ !o ee t% nM - ?1 OM F-goy 6300 (Open 12/02) Burger King $13 - % a - 4'994 2954 "-1- 14 s I Whitehouse Gear ++z.- I t 3'1•q bc)- 3V3-1500 1 76 Q Liberty Capital (4o OGl? 900 Z-19-45010 Clearwater Police 900 JSharmaine Hair, Nails Salon 447- z.ot-S' 900 Cl tea- 41 I"• e., 0..y ?Vie? omt Realty, Internatio al CFA--1- zwtb 1200 9 1M - 5 PQ+ , - F w•xos AVAILABLE 900 212 AVAILABLE 900 213 AVAILABLE ZZ b 33 900 461- 214-15 •TM s • to P? J KiKu Japanese Steak House us Bar 2700 ?• s..? a:6o -» v«, 220 ? Island Health & Fitness f+4 3 - z, zs 3' 4652 S` 3 o AM • ?o p t-\ M• F S..* 8- to On Sa} 5-• 6 • S P? LICENSED REAL ESTATE BROKER • COMMERCIAL SPECIALISTS • SALES - LEASING - PROPERTY MANAGMENT i D -?--.? co- ?za-s • O ' ?I AOL L o-Lj Nz dker- 30 fir. 414- 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:36 PM To: Clayton, Gina; Wells, Wayne Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: FW: Pelican Walk--Draft of Updated Demand Analysis fyi Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department (fierce@clearwater-fl.com 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax -----Original Message----- From: Campos, Geraldine Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:29 PM To: Tarapani, Cyndi; Fierce, Lisa Cc: Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: Pelican Walk--Draft of Updated Demand Analysis Hi Cyndi and Lisa: Attached is the draft report of the updated demand analysis for the Pelican Walk garage. Chance Management will be revising and sending us the final report soon. In the meantime, we wanted to share their analysis for your information. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Geri -----Original Message----- From: Max Cooper [mailto:max.cooper@chancemanagement.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:10 PM To: Ralph Stone (E-mail) Subject: Pelican Walk Hello Mr. Stone, Here are PDFs of the draft report. Thanks, Max Cooper Management / Financial Analyst CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc Mellon Bank Center, 16th Floor 1735 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-7511 215-564-6464 Fax: 215-564-6472 max.cooper@chancemanagement.com 10/29/2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 II. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS II-1 Definition of the Study Area II-1 Parking Supply: Public and Private II-1 .Parking Demand, Occupancy, and Turnover II-4 Parking Rates II-10 III. FUTURE PARKING DEMAND AND ADEQUACY III-1 Changes in Public Parking on Clearwater Beach III-1 Future Developments III-1 Estimated Future Adequacy of Public Parking III-2 IV. PROPOSED PELICAN WALK GARAGE IV-1 Garage Size and Design IV-1 Estimated Garage Development Costs IV-1 V. PARKING GARAGE FINANCIAL FORECASTING ANALYSIS V-1 Effects of Tourist Seasons V-1 Garage Pro Formae V-1 Parking/Transportation Changes Necessary to Support the Garage V-5 0 TABLES AND FIGURES Table/Figure Page MAP 1: The Pelican Walk Study Area II-2 FIGURE 1: Study Area Parking Supply II-3 TABLE 1: Survey Schedule II-5 FIGURE 2: Peak Weekend Parking Demand at Pelican Walk Parking Lot II-6 TABLE 2: Private Parking Lot Occupancies in the Study Area II-7 TABLE 3: Public Parking Lot Occupancies in the Study Area II-9 TABLE 4: On-Street Metered Parking Occupancy II-10 TABLE 5: Summary of On- and Off-Street Parking Regulations and Prices II-11 PRO FORMA 1 V-3 PRO FORMA 2 V-4 DRAFT 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a parking supply/demand analysis and financial forecasting effort for a planned 450-space parking garage that the City of Clearwater wants to construct in the northern portion of Clearwater Beach. The intended site is located at the rear of the Pelican Walk commercial development, at the intersection of Poinsettia and South Baymont Streets, and presently serves as a surface parking lot for Pelican Walk. The City of Clearwater retained CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. (CMA) to perform the analysis. CMA is in its eighteenth year of providing management, financial, operations, and planning services in the areas of parking, transportation, and access management. The firm has served government, private, institutional, and special event center clients in over 30 states across the country. The firm previously provided consulting services to the City of Clearwater as part of a team completing a Downtown Parking and Traffic Study The project was organized into the following major tasks: ¦ determine existing parking inventory, rates, occupancy, turnover and demand in the Pelican Walk area; ¦ review current and proposed development and determine future parking demand; and ¦ determine financial performance of a proposed public parking facility. A beach garage in an area primarily devoted to tourist activities requires a more complex forecasting analysis. Peak times in an area such as Clearwater Beach are weekends, not weekdays, spring and summer, not fall and winter - generally speaking the reverse of many municipal garages. Thus a considerable amount of analysis was devoted to identifying the number of peak weekend days, peak weekdays, and the exact months of the peak season. A study area was established within a three block radius of the Pelican Walk parking lot. The study area was determined by assessing the likely distance from the garage that patrons would walk to desired destinations. To support the firm's financial forecasting, it was necessary to assess present and future parking demand in the area. This was done by conducting comprehensive parking activity studies at peak and non-peak representative times. The activity studies generated statistics on parking occupancy, vehicle turnover, and illegal parking and enforcement rates. Data from two previous parking studies performed in the area were reviewed, as were historical parking revenue and enforcement statistics provided by the City. The recent history of parking regulation and enforcement activities was discussed with City operating officials. Telephone interviews were conducted with City economic development officials to determine the anticipated future development activity that might affect parking demand in the study area. Estimates of demand were generated for those developments that are sufficiently underway to consider as real contributors to parking demand. Finally pro formae were created to express the assumptions made about the garage development, and to illustrate scenarios desired by the City. Garage construction costs were taken from a recent study done for the city of potential garage designs for this site. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. gratefully acknowledges the assistance of City of Clearwater employees who helped with data collection and observations, the Assistant City Manager, the Financial Services Administrator, and the Parking Facilities Manager and her staff during this project. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. 1-1 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis DRAFT II. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS Definition of the Study Area The Pelican Walk study area is situated in the "North Beach" area of Clearwater Beach, and is encompassed by the following boundaries: Bay Esplanade to the north; East Shore Drive to the east, the Causeway Boulevard to the south, and North Gulfview Boulevard to the west. Pelican Walk itself is situated in the approximate center of the study area, between Mandalay and Poinsettia Avenues, just to the south of Baymont Street, as shown in MAP 1. The study area is home to numerous motels (mostly along East Shore Drive and Poinsettia Avenue), several locally popular restaurants, a 400 room Hilton Hotel, the long-standing Clearwater Beach Hotel, and a variety of beach-oriented and other recreational-type commercial establishments. An Eckerd's Drug Store is located just south of the Pelican Walk complex. Recent developments along Mandalay Avenue have witnessed the construction of two high-rise beachfront condominiums, while a third 200-unit condo (located just north of Pelican Walk) is in the first stages of construction. The study area encompassed approximately one-tenth square mile, containing 2.16 street miles (4.32 curb miles). Public transportation within Clearwater Beach that includes service to the mainland is provided by The Jolly Trolley, a private shuttle service funded in part by City funds and a nominal rider fee. The peak tourist season is in March and April, due to a combination of factors including Spring Break, Easter vacations and the presence of professional baseball spring-training complexes nearby. The next highest months for tourism extend from May through just after the Labor Day holiday, with visits declining from September through the January/February timeframe. Parking enforcement services are provided by the Clearwater Beach Police Department, through the daytime and weekend patrol of a Police Services Technician (PST). Only one PST has been assigned to patrol both the North and South Beach areas for at least the past four years, due to staffing reductions and the assignment of non-enforcement tasks to existing PST positions. The typical day's patrol covers in excess of 1,000 parking meters, from North Beach south to Sand Key Park. The large size of the patrol area effectively precludes enforcement of several thirty minute and one hour timed parking zones within the study area. Likewise, parking safety infractions, which generally are of a brief duration, may receive only sporadic enforcement. Parking Supply: Public and Private Parking within the area is provided through a combination of City parking meters, both on street and in four principal off-street lots; time-limited non-metered on-street spaces; private off-street parking lots (including the 102-space surface lot behind Pelican Walk), and through unregulated on-street spaces. FIGURE 1 provides a chart illustrating the composition of the study area's legal parking supply, including those spaces on street which are unregulated, and private off-street locations. In total, the study area encompasses over 2,000 parking spaces, approximately two-thirds of which were located in private parking lots. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-1 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • • DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-2 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis MAP 1: The Pelican Walk Study Area • • DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FIGURE 1: Study Area Parking Supply ? 13% ? 66 ¦ 3% ? 2% ?1% ¦ 15% ? Metered Lot (273) ¦ Metered Street (65) ?Timed Parking (no meters) (39)I ?Unregulated (surveyed) (21) ¦ Other Unregulated (300) ?Private off-street (1,351) CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. Within a two block radius of Pelican Walk, each of the above types of parking may be found. Two City- owned metered parking lots lie several blocks north of Pelican Walk and primarily serve beachgoers and restaurant patrons, and include Lots 36 (145 meters) and Lot 38 (80 meters). Each of the lots is regulated for a five-hour parking time limit at $1.00 per hour on weekdays, and $1.25 per hour during weekends; weekday meter parking during March and April also is priced at $1.25 per hour. Lot 38 primarily serves as overflow parking for Lot 36, which is the most highly occupied of all lots in North Beach. Lot 36 meters are operational from 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., while Lot 38's meter regulations end at 6:00 p.m.. Similarly priced on-street parking meters are adjacent to both lots, including both sides of 500 Mandalay Avenue, 50 Bay Esplanade and 30 Rockaway Street. Parking on the lower portion (the 300 and 400 blocks) of Mandalay Avenue is served by Lots 34 and 35, which contain 24 and 25 meters, respectively. Meters operate from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday. Just south of Lot 34 and running along the east side of Mandalay Avenue, two-hour meters provide customer parking for the adjacent commercial establishments. These meters also stop operating at 6:00 p.m.. One-hour time limited (non-metered) parking is located on the south side of Baymont Street, between Mandalay Avenue, east past East Shore Drive, and serves restaurants and other commercial establishments. Both one-hour and 30 minute time limited parking is also provided on the east side of Poinsettia Street, adjacent to a hardware store, just south of Papaya Street. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-3 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis DRAFT Private parking areas abound in North Beach, with more than 1,300 spaces located on hotel and motel properties, and those adjacent to restaurants and other commercial establishments. The Pelican Walk parking lot accounts for only 7.5 percent of the private parking supply (102 spaces located behind the complex), with access to and from Poinsettia Avenue. This lot is signed for the exclusive use of Pelican Walk customers, although it appeared during the CMA's parking activity surveys that beachgoers were also parking there on occasion and little enforcement was in evidence since the lot was never full. Numerous unregulated on-street parking opportunities also exist. In the mid to late 1990s, the City began a program to remove a number of the no-parking restrictions that were previously located along streets and avenues in North Beach in an effort to promote tourism and provide additional parking. Enforcement activity was similarly reduced with the removal of the signs. The parking violation effects within the study area have been difficult to quantify, as there is no proactive program of on-going parking activity studies. However, uncontrolled parking conditions along side streets and avenues would naturally contribute to the jammed traffic and parking conditions or "gridlock" during peak periods (such as Spring Break) that were reported by enforcement and other City officials contacted during this study. Moreover, unregulated parking would have a negative effect on potential patronage of any public parking structure being contemplated, since people will park in free unregulated spaces before patronizing any paid parking. Parking Demand, Occupancy, and Turnover To gauge existing parking demand through the analysis of occupancy and turnover statistics, parking activity surveys were conducted by CMA staff on two different weekends, over the following areas: ¦ City-owned metered parking Lots 34, 35, 36 and 38; ¦ all metered streets in the study area, including Bay Esplanade, Mandalay and Rockaway; and ¦ streets that were regulated for timed parking (Baymont Street and Poinsettia Avenue). In addition, unregulated blocks and streets were also surveyed repeatedly for vehicles that potentially would have been in violation had no-parking zones been in effect, including the south side of 030 Rockaway Street, the north side of 030 Baymont Street, 020 San Marco Street, and unregulated portions of East Shore Drive and Poinsettia Avenue. Obvious parking safety infractions were noted, as appropriate, and counts of observed tickets were recorded. Finally, repeated occupancy counts of private parking lots were conducted to gauge overall parking demand for these areas. All surveys were conducted with the assistance of City personnel, who provided technical guidance on enforceable violations and policies, anecdotal accounts of normal and peak parking conditions, and who otherwise facilitated the survey process by driving the surveyors and assisting in the notation of vehicle status. The survey schedule is indicated in TABLE 1, below. The following paragraphs detail the nature of parking demand in the vicinity of the Pelican Walk complex. They address parking conditions and patterns noted for private lots, public lots, and on-street spaces; both regulated and unregulated, according to off-peak weekday, off-peak weekend, and peak weekend periods, during daytime and evening survey hours. Just the number of different types of observations illustrates the complexity of parking demand for a tourist-oriented area. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II4 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • • DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS TABLE 1: Survey Schedule PRIVATE PARKING LOTS Surveyed maximum and average private parking lot occupancy rates are shown below in FIGURE 2 Starting with the Pelican Walk lot, each subsequent lot is farther in distance from the Pelican complex. As illustrated in FIGURE 2, peak weekend parking occupancy at the Pelican Walk lot averaged only 33 percent, and only reached a maximum of 59 percent (60 vehicles parked) during one survey pass. Given the relative day and time (Saturday afternoon) of the peak demand and visual observations of parking patrons, it was assumed by survey field staff that most of the patrons were beachgoers parking in the lot. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-5 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. • • DRAFT CITY OF CLEARWATER PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FIGURE 2: Peak Weekend Parking Demand at Pelican Walk Parking Lot 120 Capacity =102 Spaces 100 80 60 40 20 0 Sat Day Sat Eve Sun Day Sun Eve Mon Day Mon Eve Pass 1 33 25 29 27 30 47 Q Pass 2 33 35 27 34 33 22 Q Pass 3 60 40 27 39 34 Capacity 102 102 102 102 102 102 CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. Only area restaurant parking lots, including the Heilman's Restaurant lot with its satellite valet parking area, exhibited occupancy rates consistently approaching or exceeding 90 percent for any length of time, among lots in the vicinity of retail establishments and restaurants. In addition, Sun Trust Bank's parking lot (at 27 parking spaces), was consistently above capacity, with vehicles "stacked" in the drive-through teller lanes. Despite the presence of "customer-only" and "tow-away" parking prohibition signs, the Bank (located approximately 1.5 blocks south of Pelican Walk) appears to be a favorite free parking lot for evening and weekend visitors to North Beach. The maximum peak weekend occupancy rate for all lots combined was 69 percent, as illustrated in the last rows of the TABLE 2. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-6 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS TABLE 2: Private Parking Lot Occupancies in the Study Area SUMMATION: All Private Parkin Lots 1,351 Spaces Weekday Off-Peak Off-Peak Peak Average Maximum occupancy: daytime 38% 47% 65% Average occupancy : daytime 35% 39% 54% Average Maximum occupant : evening 51% 68% 69% Average occupancy: evening 46% 57% 56% Pelican Walk 102 Spaces Maximum occupancy: daytime 39% 35% 59% Average occupancy: daytime 39% 25% 33% Maximum occupancy: evening 29% 34% 46% Average occupancy: evening 25% 27% 33% Eckerd Drug 32 Spaces Maximum occupancy: daytime 47% 75% 94% Average occupant : daytime 42% 43% 57% Maximum occupancy: evening 50% 88% 84% Average occupancy: evening 44% 68% 63% Waterfront Shopping Center 26 Spaces Maximum occupancy: daytime 31% 65% 69% Average occupancy: daytime 25% 58% 50% Maximum occupancy: evening 46% 73% 77% Average occupancy: evening 36% 62% 50% Clearwater Beach Hotel 127 Spaces (primary lot and two satellite lots Maximum occupancy: daytime 42% 73% 90% Average occupant : daytime 40% 66% 78% Maximum occupancy: evening 76% 85% 100% Average occupant : evening 60% 72% 77% Hellman's Restaurant 55 Spaces (including valet parking location Maximum occupancy: daytime 45% 29% 53% Average occupancy: daytime 32% 18% 25% Maximum occupancy: evening -82% 96% 89% Average occupancy: evening 72% 77% 61% Sun Trust Bank 27 Spaces Maximum occupancy: daytime 74% 100% 111% Average occupancy: daytime 61% 70% 70% Maximum occupancy: evening 85% 122% 130% Average occupancy: evening 72% 104% 106% CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-7 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • • DRAFT Hilton Hotel 396 Spaces Off-Peak Weekday Off-Peak Peak Maximum occupanc : daytime 79% Average occupancy: daytime 71% Maximum occupancy: evening 50% 86% 76% Average occupancy: evening 50% 86% 63% Other Restaurants in Area 71 Spaces Maximum occupancy: daytime 61% 61% 72% Average occupancy: daytime 52% 39% 46% Maximum occupanc : evening 90% 94% 94% Average occupancy: evening 84% 75% 83% Motels in Stud Area 320 Spaces Maximum occupancy: daytime 23% 37% 46% Average occupancy: daytime 23% 35% 40% Maximum occupancy: evening 40% 48% 51% Average occupancy: evening 36% 29% 44% Other/Miscellaneous 195 SPACES Maximum occupanc : daytime 43% 40% 47% Average occupancy: daytime 42% 35% 4706 Maximum occupancy: evening 38% 42% 48% Average occupancy: evening 30% 30% 39% CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. PUBLIC PARKING LOTS Except for Lot 36 (the primary lot for beachgoers and customers of two popular restaurants located at either end of the lot), the three remaining public parking (metered) lots in the study area reached capacity only at limited times - generally on weekend days. A sustained occupancy pattern throughout the day or evening was typically not exhibited, as indicated by overall occupancy averages that were significantly below maximum rates. Vehicle turnover was within norms at lots 34, 35 and 38. (Parking meters in these three lots currently do not operate past 6:00 p.m., so in any future parking garage scenario for Pelican Walk, there would be no reason for anyone to pay to park in the garage in the evening as long as free parking were available.) Among the four lots surveyed, Lot 36 demonstrated the most consistent occupancy pattern, with a 98 percent average occupancy rate, across all survey passes of all weekend passes (both peak and non- peak). However, metered spaces in Lot 36 turned over at twice the expected rate for the five-hour meters, indicating a potential to lower the regulated time limit by at least one hour (from five to four hours). TABLE 3 below highlights existing parking occupancy for the City parking lots in the study area. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-8 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis 0 0 DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS TABLE 3: Public Parking Lot Occupancies in the Study Area Lot 34: 24 Spaces 23 mETERS Weekday Off-Peak Off-Peak Peak Maximum occupancy: daytime 26% 65% 91% Average occupancy: daytime 15% 51% 44% Maximum occupancy: evening 39% 95% 78% Average occupancy: evening 28% 69% 50% Lot 35: 26 Spaces 25 meters Maximum occupancy: daytime [2] 84% 68% Average occupancy: daytime 2% 44% 14% Maximum occupancy: evening 24% 100% 80% Average occupancy: evening 17% 58% 43% Lot 36: 151 Spaces 145 meters Maximum occupanc : daytime 50% 100% 100% Average occupancy: daytime 45% 95% 100% Maximum occupancy: evening 92% 98% 100% Average occupancy: evening 58% -96% 82% Lot 38: 84 Spaces 80 meters Maximum occupancy: daytime 100% 100% 95% Average occupancy: daytime 4% 61% 68% Maximum occupancy: evening 5% 50% 950/c Average occupancy: evening 4% 37% 370/6 CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. NOTES: [1] The initial survey of Lot 36 was conducted on Friday evening, 16 August 2002. All other lots were surveyed from Saturday morning through Monday evening, 17 - 19 August 2002. Friday evening and Monday were considered as weekdays. Rain occurred during Saturday evening and Monday afternoon. [2] Lot 35's entrance on Mandalay Avenue was closed due to construction on Saturday, 17 August 2002. ON-STREET PARKING METERS AND UNREGULATED SPACES Metered blocks surveyed included the 360, 500 and 550 blocks of Mandalay Avenue, and the 050 block of Bay Esplanade. These blocks contained a total of 64 meters, with five-hour parking being the predominant regulated duration, except for two-hour meters that were located on the 300 and 500 block (west side) of Mandalay. The blocks demonstrating the highest consistent meter occupancy pattern were the 360 block of Mandalay Avenue, and the 030 block of Rockaway St., which typically were occupied near capacity during most survey periods. However, the average meter occupancy for all on-street meters was 82 percent for two-hour meters, and 58 percent for five-hour meters. Existing occupancy of on-street parking meters in the study area, as well as the numbers of vehicles parked illegally or on unregulated streets daily, is shown below in TABLE 4. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-9 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS TABLE 4: On-Street Metered Parking Occupancy Parking Rates At the present time, the parking meter rate at three of the four City-owned lots (Lot 36 being the exception),at $1.00 per hour on weekdays and $1.25 per hour on weekends, appears appropriate given the satisfactory parking occupancy, illegal parking, and percent of optimum turnover rates observed, which were well within established parking industry norms/ranges. In addition, the meter violation ticket fine, at $10, appears to support the hourly meter rate, but may be low when contrasted to the $8 to $10 parking fee charged at the Hilton Hotel parking lot for open beach parking. However, the excessive occupancy observed at Lot 36 (well above 95 percent) would indicate a higher meter rate would be appropriate at this location. Adjusting this rate, in concert with potential parking customer guidance signs and focused shuttle support, could have positive affects both on parking conditions at Lot 36 and a garage at Pelican Walk. The violation capture rate observed in Lot 36 during the peak weekend period was well below the 33 percent that would be considered a norm for most parking management programs. As previously stated, Police Services Technician staffing levels are the major contributing factor to this condition, which would need to be remedied in order to promote patronage of a new garage. TABLE 5 provides a summary of the on- and off-street parking regulations and prices. Each "tier" of the table shows the primary, secondary and tertiary regulation, respectively, that is assigned to the type of parking space indicated for the streets listed in the first column of the table. The number of spaces refers to the number of regulated spaces (for example, meters). In addition to providing a summary of the streets on which detailed parking activity surveys were conducted, TABLE 5 illustrates the variable regulations and rates that the City has used to help better manage parking at peak periods. Weekend parking meter rates increase by $.25 per hour over the weekday rate, equaling the daily hourly rates that are set during March and April. This is an effective strategy that should be continued in any future increase to the City's base meter rate. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-10 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. • • DRAFT City of Clearwater PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS TABLE 5: Summary of On- and Off-Street Parking Regulations and Prices Number O --Parklnc Regulation qtrj Parkin Regula Days in Metaf Ba r lat 30 Baymout St. S Timing 1 1 hour Not indicated 30 R S Unregulated 1 N/A NIA 30 R S N Metered 7 .5 h MO-FR 1 360 Mandalay Ave, Metered 16 2 r 8:00 AM 6:00 PM MO-FR $0.7d 40 Baymcknt St S ITimina r Notindicated N A 400 Poinsettia Ave Ti in 7 1 hour. 30 m' A 11 Bay rsdanade s Mptered 16 5 hour 8:00 AM $1,0C Timing 1 hour o indicated 50 PPaoava SL S Timina 4 r Not indicated M f Ave, E t ered 16 15 hour 8:00 AM 6:00 PM MO-FR $1.0c Ma I W Metered r 8:00 AM 6:00 P MO-FR 07 550 Mandalav Ave- w W=L- 8,00 AM 6,00 P MO-FR Lot 34 M r 890 AM 690 P MO-FR Lot 35 Metered 2 r M 890 A 6:00 PM MO-FR 1 Lot 36 Metered 6,00 A M 1,00 A MO-FR Lot 38 Metered hour M 6:00 PM MO-FR Ntanber Second Parking Parki Regttta'. r Pa Regulatio, Days in Secono Meter R 30 BavnxxA S N n It 30 Baymont St. S min 1 Rockaway 30 tt 1 Rockaway 30 Metered Metered 5h 6,00 A 1,00 AM SA-SU $1.2 360 Mandalay 1 Metered 2h M 890 A P 6:00 40 Baymont St. s min 50 Bav n S Metered I Metered 5h 50 t SL s imin 11 500 M I Ave. Metered 1 Metered 5h 8890 AM 6700 P M A- 500 Mandalay W Metered Metered 2h 8:00 AM 6:00 PM SA-SU $1. 5W Mandalay Ave, w Metered Metered 5h 8: AM 6:00 M SA-SU $1.25 Lot 34 Metered Metered 5h 88:00 AM 6:00 PM1 SA-SU 1 Lot 35 Metered Metered 8: AM 6:00PMI SA-SU $1.2 Lot -kq Metered Metered 5h 8,00 M 6!00 P SA $1.25 1 Nurnt)K o Pecking Parkin Regula' Parkin' Regulafro Qays in T#nrd Mate R 30 Baymprit SL N n lat 30 Baymoat St s Ti b 1 30 R SL nr lat 1 360 Mandalay Metered 1 r- 'I 1.00 v a 40 Baymont St. s min 7 400 Poinsettia Ave. E Timina 7 _ .5h 50 Bay Esplanade s Metered 1 Papaya 50 S Timing Mandalay 500 1 Mar-Acril 500 Mandalay W Metered r- 1,001 everyday 550 Ma I Ave. W - rill e I 2 v a of 36 M tered nl 2 a Lot 38 ered 1 M P 1 '1 a CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. II-11 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis 0 0 DRAFT III. FUTURE PARKING DEMAND AND ADEQUACY Changes in Public Parking on Clearwater Beach As part of a North Beach revitalization effort, a number of significant changes have taken place along Mandalay Avenue, north of the Pier 60 Drive and Causeway Boulevard. Additional changes are being planned for South Beach that may also have an affect on North Beach parking. Earlier in 2002, over 30 parking meters along the 300 and 400 blocks of Mandalay Avenue were permanently removed (between the Hilton Hotel, north to Baymont Street on the west side of the Avenue, and along the east side of the Avenue beside Pelican Walk. This was to permit the sidewalk's widening to improve pedestrian walking conditions along the east side of the Avenue. It is anticipated that eight parking meters will be reinstalled along Papaya Street to partially off-set the loss in short-term parking. Also, the City's Parking Facilities Manager has indicated that two small plots of unused ground at the base of Poinsettia Avenue and East Shore Drive are being considered as potential locations for parking meters. The City of Clearwater is also planning to modify a portion of South Gulfview Boulevard, creating a "serpentine" road along the beach. This redevelopment will displace approximately 270 parking spaces currently located in the area. Approximately 210 replacement spaces are expected to be created in an agreement with a developer in the South Beach area. This agreement will essentially allow the City to use a parcel of land as a parking lot, with the possible option of converting this land to a parking structure later. During and after construction of the "serpentine" road, there will be a net reduction of about 60 spaces in the South Beach area, which could result in additional parking demand in North Beach as a segment of South Beach patrons seek alternative parking locations for their recreational activities. Future Developments There are three noteworthy developments currently under construction in the Pelican Walk area. These developments include the following: ¦ the Mandalay Beach Club condominium, a 150 unit high-rise nearing completion, located at on San Marco Street and Mandalay Avenue; ¦ the Belle Harbor condominium project, a 200 unit low-rise project under construction at Mandalay Avenue north of Baymont Street; and ¦ the leasing of 6,300 square feet of space in the Pelican Walk center to Outback Steakhouse, a national upscale steakhouse chain that, according to the Assistant City Manager, will begin construction early 2003. Other less specific developments are in the planning stages and may or may not occur, according to the City. These developments include a reorganization of retail space planned for the west side of Mandalay Avenue between San Marco and Papaya Street. The street is currently home to a liquor store, a bar, and various other retail establishments. This development would create nicer storefronts with more attractive retailers, but it is not projected to add to parking demand since plans are not detailed enough at this time to make any projection on increased parking demand. Other proposed development would create condominiums and possibly restaurants in the area east of the beach, south of Baymont Street. Though there are numerous developments under consideration or in the planning stages, CMA does not believe that any of these developments will affect parking demand in the Pelican Walk area. Both condominium projects under construction are providing ample parking for their residents. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. III-1 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • DRAFT Belle Harbor is providing 405 spaces of parking, while the Mandalay Beach Club is providing 260 spaces of private parking. The minimum parking to be provided by condominium developers, according to the Tourist District zoning regulations, is 1.5 spaces per unit. Thus, both condominiums exceed this requirement, and are expected to have more than enough parking for their residents and visitors. No condominium residents are projected to require any other parking spaces. The proposed condominiums would undoubtedly have ample private parking as well, since a lack of parking for residents would seriously affect the ability to finance the projects, as well as the sale price of any proposed condominium units. Perhaps if a "destination" restaurant were built in the area, more parking demand would be generated. But again, the restaurant would probably build parking to accommodate customers. The Outback Steakhouse development will have the most effect on parking demand. This is a nationally recognized restaurant, and it will attract a wide variety of patrons to this end of Clearwater Beach. Although the restaurant square footage is not really large, it is anticipated that at least two seating will take place most evenings that the restaurant is open, particularly during the peak season months. The parking demand associated with Outback has been estimated in the financial section of this report. A last future development to consider is the potential leasing of the remaining 7,000 square feet of vacant space in Pelican Walk, although this would not have a substantial effect on parking demand unless a destination retail or restaurant were to lease this space. CMA is unaware of any potential tenants for this space at the present time. In addition, considering that this space represents less than 20 percent of the gross leasable area of Pelican Walk, a significant increment in parking demand would be unlikely. Estimated Future Adequacy of Public Parking The addition of the Outback Steakhouse in Pelican Walk will place a strain on the existing 102-space surface lot during peak parking periods, as it is anticipated that more spaces than exist in the lot will be required to support Outback patrons and employees. Customers will likely seek parking on surrounding streets (Poinsettia Avenue, East Shore Drive, Mandalay Avenue above Baymont Street, and both sides of Baymont Street itself). This overflow could create problematic pedestrian and vehicular traffic conditions in the immediate area of the restaurant. In addition, the continued presence of one-hour parking now on the south side of Baymont Street, east of Mandalay Avenue, could cause safety problems as vehicles back out of the angled parking spaces and into oncoming traffic. CMA also projects that due to the displacement of parking in South Beach during the serpentine construction project, it may be possible that on a typical weekend, up to 180 motorists may seek alternative recreation and parking in North Beach. These would be people intending to visit South Beach, but because of the construction and reduced parking spaces, they may seek a different location. CMA has estimated that when the construction project is finished, (currently anticipated to be Spring Break 2005), it is possible that at least half of these customers will return to their usual destination and remain in South Beach, while the remaining half (representing approximately 90 vehicles daily on weekends) may choose to continue frequenting North Beach for its own unique appeal and because they have gotten in the habit of parking and visiting there. Additional factors that could also affect the future adequacy of public parking in North Beach must be considered in the realm of possibility, as opposed to probability at this point in time. For instance, should Sun Trust Bank officials begin aggressive enforcement of the no-parking restrictions on the Bank's private lot, or bar its entrances altogether during non-operating hours, upwards of 90 motorists (on a peak weekend day) could be searching for alternative parking in the area. Any future development along East Shore Drive would definitely affect parking requirements, although at the present time development plans are uncertain. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. III-2 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • 0 DRAFT As Hilton Hotel occupancy fluctuates, the Hotel's policy of selling beach parking during periods of low room occupancy could represent either a relief valve for congested parking conditions or competition to a City-owned garage. Also, if the City were to install additional parking meters at the base of East Shore Drive, it is impossible to quantify without further study the number of patrons who would otherwise be seeking parking in North Beach as opposed to South Beach. CMA's conclusion on future parking adequacy is that the present parking supply in the Pelican Walk area is adequate to serve all known future parking demand with the exception of the Outback Steakhouse. If there is the desire to serve this development at the site, rather than allowing or forcing the use of surrounding parking spaces on other streets in the area, additional parking needs to be developed. Further, the periods of unmet demand related to Outback will be focused during the peak Clearwater Beach season, particularly on weekends. During other periods - non-peak and weekdays in particular - demand will not exceed the existing parking supply. While it is certainly possible that additional development will take place in this area of the North Beach, and the City has approved the "Beach by Design" plan that indicates further development, the extent of this future commercial/retail/hotel/restaurant development is unknown, as is the parking demand it would generate. Therefore, there is limited known parking demand that will exceed today's supply. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. III-3 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis 0 0 DRAFT IV. PROPOSED PELICAN WALK GARAGE Garage Size and Design The City of Clearwater has commissioned previous designs for a garage on the Pelican Walk site. The latest set of designs and cost estimating were produced by the Urbitran Group. In a report earlier this year, Urbitran presented a variety of alternative designs and construction parameters to the City. The City and CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. chose to use for analysis purposes alternative number Three, with post-tensioned, cast-in-place construction and normal foundation conditions. This 450 space design has four entrance/exit lanes from Poinsettia Avenue. The proposed traffic pattern in this alternative is two parking bays, with one-way traffic flow. Parking spaces would be angled. The garage would contain two double helix ramps, and the site size is approximately 317 feet by 108 feet. Estimated Garage Development Cost Construction cost estimates for the proposed parking garage at Pelican Walk came from the study by the Urbitran Group. Due to regional inflation in construction costs, CMA increased the expected construction cost of the garage by three percent as per the City's instructions. Operating costs were determined from existing operations at the Garden Avenue Garage, and modified based on the expected size and operating characteristics of the proposed Pelican Walk structure. Garage construction costs are estimated at $15,870 per space, not including "soft" costs and other associated expenses. Total development project costs are shown on the pro formae in Section V. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. IV-1 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • • DRAFT V. PARKING GARAGE FINANCIAL FORECASTING ANALYSIS Effects of Tourist Seasons A beach community presents unique challenges in forecasting parking demand. There are peak seasons and off-peak seasons, as well as fluctuations in weekend vs. weekday demand. In addition, in the case of Clearwater, several holidays during the peak and off-peak times generate very high parking demand. From examining City parking lot revenue and ticket issuance, CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. determined that Clearwater has three distinct seasons of parking demand. From May 1st through August 31st is the "peak" season. The July 4th and Memorial Day holidays fall within this period. From September 1st through February 31st is the "off-peak" season. Holidays during this period are not huge parking generators in Clearwater, and overall travel and tourism is low in the City. From March 1st to April 30th is the "extra peak" season. Through analysis of parking revenue, CMA determined that parking activity in these two months was approximately eight percent (8%) higher than the peak months of May, June, July, and August. Therefore, the "extra peak" period became a distinct season for reasons of more accurate analysis of Clearwater parking demand. The Easter weekend holiday falls within this season. CMA then determined the number of days in each of these seasons, separated into weekdays and weekends. The results are as follows: 'Seasons, Off-peak weekdays Numbel 00 Day, 1 Off-peak weekends 50 Peak weekdays 81 Peak weekends 42 Extra-peak weekdays 40 Extra-peak weekends 21 The 2003 calendar was used in determining the number of days within each season. To further calibrate these numbers, three days of peak weekday were converted to peak weekend for the Memorial Day holiday; the same was done for the July 4th holiday, and three days of extra peak weekday were converted to three days of extra-peak weekend days for the Easter holiday. Garage Pro Formae PRO FORMA 1 presents the first analysis scenario of the proposed 450 space garage on the Pelican Walk site. In this pro forma, all garage patrons pay market rate. In PRO FORMA 2, rates proposed by the City for Pelican Walk and Outback Steakhouse are shown (free parking for one hour for Pelican Walk customers, with two hours free on weekdays and two and a half hours free on weekends for Outback Steakhouse customers). Since Pelican Walk customers typically stay less than one hour, this is essentially free parking for them, and the only Outback customers who would pay are those estimated to stay longer than the periods specified. On both pro formae, these elements are as follows: ¦ The garage would start design on or about 1 January 2003, for a period of six months. Construction would last another 12 months, and the garage would open in July 2004. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. V-1 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis 0 0 DRAFT ¦ Revenue from those displaced by the construction of the serpentine road, beachgoers, and violations/re-regulations are estimates based upon existing conditions or planned construction. ¦ Estimates of Outback Restaurant customers are based upon the square footage projected for the restaurant (6,300 SF). An estimated parking demand is projected of 18 vehicles per 1,000 SF. The national standards quote a range of 5 - 25 vehicles per 1,000 SF. Since this restaurant will be a local destination restaurant, rather than simply serving hotel patrons within walking distance, a higher range was used. Weekends during the peak period and off- peak weekends are assumed to have peak restaurant demand. Peak weekdays have 70 percent of the peak demand, while off-peak weekdays have 50 percent of peak demand. Extra peak weekends have peak demand plus 8 percent. ¦ Operating expenses are estimated from operating expenses experienced by the City of Clearwater in its existing garage. These costs are changed appropriately based upon the number of spaces and the fact that the Pelican Walk garage will be open 24 hours per day, seven days a week. Personnel costs are reduced to one full-time person, due to pay-on-foot technology. Since the lowest possible operating costs are desired, operating expenses with full cashiers were not used. ¦ The City requested that two years of interest be capitalized, and that a principal payment not be made until the garage was open and operating. This would be in the second half of 2004. ¦ In both pro formae, a $1,000,000 Parking Fund contribution is made to reduce the project costs. ¦ All other pertinent information may be found in the notes accompanying the pro formae. PRO FORMA 1 illustrates the garage performance with all patrons paying market rates to park in the garage, After the garage is fully operating, in 2005, the annual deficit is in excess of $400,000 annually. This is due to a lack of demand for the garage throughout the year, the fact that Clearwater's pattern of rate increases supports rate changes only every five years, and operating costs increase annually even if revenues do not. Parking demand comes from regular beachgoers, those displaced from parking on South Beach, people who have been parking illegally, and Pelican Walk and Outback Steakhouse customers. CMA assumed that the Pelican Walk Garage would attract 100 daily beachgoing customers on peak weekends and 108 daily customers on extra peak weekends. In other words, the garage spaces would only be in demand by beachgoers on weekends between March and August in the early years. Then, as development and tourism increase in this part of Clearwater Beach, and as beach visitors become more comfortable with using this garage, this number of customers is expected to increase 10 percent annually during these times. Each beachgoer is expected to stay for an average of two and a half hours, meaning that beachgoers would pay the three hour garage parking rate. CMA believes that employee monthly permits are not a feasible source of income for the Pelican Walk Garage. Currently, employees working in Pelican Walk park for free in the adjoining lot. It is unlikely that these workers would want to spend a significant portion of their paychecks in order to continue parking in a convenient area. More likely is that employees will find alternative transportation to their workplace, carpool, or actively search for cheaper or unregulated spaces in which to park. In addition, the City already provides employee parking permits to beach workers, giving them free parking at City meters. It is unlikely that any employees would choose to pay to park their cars in a paid garage considering these circumstances. PRO FORMA 2 illustrates the same garage conditions, but with special rates for Pelican Walk and Outback Steakhouse customers. Since the most significant source of garage demand is the Outback Steakhouse, reducing rates to free or minimal amounts for these customers eliminates most of the projected revenue. Annual deficits are in excess of $700,000 after the garage is established. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. V-2 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis DRAFT Lily of Clearwater PELICAN} WALK PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS PRO FORMA t: 450 Spam CaS114n-ftaca Garage with 30 Year AmorlizaWn, Pay-on-Foot Techno y, and Parking Fund Contribuban 2064 24899 2006 2007 2rNM 2009 200 2811 2012 2613 AE VENUE Outback Custamets. l S 155845 S 337,904 S 337,904 $ 3V 9054 337 9074 S 304,936 S 384.836 384.{{36 $ 380 936 S 304 636 S*Venu* Dis iaoemeal S - S 79,574 S 45,765 3 45,765 3 45 766 $ 50,850 S 54.8s0 3' 50.860 S 50.9550 S 59,850 S 9450 S 32,417 $ 35218 ' S X740 S 47.814 52,084 $ $7292 S 63.022 $ 69,324 S 76.256 1fir tianstRei•ro Cam 141 PoNCan Wak Customers 5 S S 3.948 8,240 S S 6129 17417 $ $ 0129 18.354 $ S 5,12EI t4 S S 8.129 20,732 S S 10.08 28. $ S 1 938 740 S $ 101638 31227 S $ 10.838 32,765. S S 40838. 34.628 TOTAL PARKING INCOME $177,573 ' $475.141 x445,367 $449.W* $454.644 $529,932 x333,556 $540,773 $548.636 55571208 EXPEMSFS 8 Opwa*V Ex s S 128.9t9 S 17071 $ 285,630 ; 69.815 S !273 659 S 277.764 S 619:96 S 2861159 S (aO,4521 S 4294,808 tea aoguW4 Fund 6 S $ S $ ; S 36.009 $ (3a,000 3 40 *004 S (40.5001 S (45000) f] 5e ti{oe Pa ent $ 108.952 $ 635.309 S 635 364 3 (635,30{{) S 1635,309 S 0835,30'JS t 835 389 S 635,3091 $ 635.300 S (835,309 7QTALEXPENSES ANNUAi Wt T rtEVBNt)E t t}EFtCrr $ $ 237,8741 6D 914 S $ 897.014 1,015 3 $ 906.939 155 673 3 904,424 45511# $ f 968 454.324 $ $ 949,473 422;441 S 53,239 419:683 S 61.868} 421.186 $ $ joizz 417,875 S $ (975.1'1 447.110 GumulatNO C C3var $ 60.298 $ 482,211 $ 437 483 5 1391,991 S t,847,225 S 356 $ &689,050) $ 1 10,2451 527 870 :$ 3,945,700 Debt Swvtco Cowr o Rath SCR 045 434 0.28 1128 4128 4 34 0.34 0:34 01.34 0;34 Au1d't Rovanue Nacossa tar 11.25 OSCR S 87,536 S 580,740 $ 614,400 $ 613.905 3 613,152 S 688,969 f 578,510 S 569,073 S 576,462 1S 576,737 G!la4CiManopww 1Qursr6tc ASSUMPTIONS "age conswallolt Cast S 7.141,786 Wwast Rate: 6100% Sat Casts (Logat, fins m, ato ) S 71079 Amortka*n Patron: 30 Revortuo Co&d Equipmant Cant S 270,040 Total Cost per space $18,068 FVicm Oat Purthme (City ettimata) S 41000.060 COW W"110M Puking FWW $ (1,0001000} PROJECT CO&I 1`0"FINANCCO S 8.12$965 Two Yom of Capkalued imams! S 902.1117 TOTAL PitDJECT COST To 6E F44ANCED $ 9.028,082 NOTES [lt t?rsirsssarrsrr?gmy spay as moat[riiea, ctxuasiuns Mara pasien p5nadaivr?7m ig VMSparr Carl5F,ssnartfPnuslWir oT tfattwain6i ava`•tt6ia 1st aaf.ssi?flMfta .fR Cal YWxi CfArTij ?8ursY W river ip r raa?Nr?y CcrM action. TAep beCOM g3laWCuOrw Am for an MWkm Dorm{, *WV hiaslatin$ 0*)W4 Ono 4#604z [3j 1n4 figure rpresa= tstimalao twasnsaer?%acV wwo pWm b4 ay laantta Wins oatogfi, C# tMS6gare reptvsar+ra thole paWng iurgaty<r an W99440* wow MalfwirN6rtorsStpaWrttgt prt MVVIM Tvto- o Woexa mwt SWIM paw MWANana an anrooaaiag taunt ut psa 04? iryt. [61 TnaagumissoG"Werratarrrgrgv4vwamWie»rwkr0a+i*4owii+WWpWVW a aasuavoWetnool imWMAaDUy rpassa.sw"Wap?rttgtoNianr Miittvairo4rrncMka. la[ taesreryarlsaoas5srre•.anopadrngtrrrWpiiWlawi. Ft opwaw'p eyrtarW* arriXtok5w 14% may. tW in;s soli o aeronaa a+a ilrvi rns rtsri+n ada. to ro.rcr osf:rsa p$atatr ?. M tho Oly rswoolod (hat antawlA be, "ptia "tw f 044 ao yrria. and me hu pdsujolppeysaaM due after" p rags aeanir'1 • 0 CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. V-3 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis DRAFT City of Clearwater PELICAN WALK PARKING DEMAND AND GARAGE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS PRO FORMA 2: 450 Space Cast4n4Placa Garage with 30 Year Amortization. Pay-on-Foot Technology,. Fatting Fund Contribution, and Rata9lJl estautant Ratans 2401 20tt3 20" 7007 ' 20111 3809 30310 2411 2012 2013 REVENUE Outback Custom e" 1 $ 44.362 1 48,974 S 98874 S 9 974 $ 2810,74 $ 109,972 S 109,972 $ 109,972 S 109,972 i 109 477 Sri tywDi Iacamcnt 2 1 - S 79,574 S ,. 45.765 S 4 785 $ 4k70 $ 850 S 50.850 S 50851! S SOW 3 50,831? 11rst1 It_ 9 450 $ 32,07 S 36:218 S 38 740 $ 42.614 S 52 084 S 57-'42 $ 63,074 S 69.324 S 78.258 VicidVbaW ulaficns 4. S 3.7548 S 4129 $ 8.129 S 8,128 $ 8,129 $ 10,838 S 101838 $ 10838 3 110,8 4 S 10938 Pelican Walk Ctutwmez 5 S ... - 1 - $ $ - 1 s 1 $ TOfALPAR{ONOINCOME 557.8039 3218,894 1188;086 5191609 5195,492 $223.143 $;2"18,952 $23416111 $240,90 5247,516 t'3rpl "ES aratl E t es M i 178,9t5 3 261711 $ 65 &30 S 299 &111 5 (2 73.859) i .784 S 8t.930 88.158 3045' S 08 pyeir ahd RB aw4Wvt Fund 8 f - 5 3 i - $ - S (36,000) $ (X000 S f0.30o S t 5030 S 45000 tlW 12t ea Pa meni S 108,95 S 1635.309 $ 035,309 S 35.309) S 16135 3WI $ 1635,309 $ 309 .3,19; $ t$X,309 TOTAL EXPENSES S 237.870 S 897,014 $ (904 .924) $ 1949,968 S . 490,073 S (953!239} 1231} ANiNt14t NETtiflVENOt>r / tlEfiCiT 180,4181 13 1 i 13, i 6329 24 2 5,217 S 727,20 858.381 $ 157l.234 2,294,550 S 2.898 5 1723365 S 4.447.653 M 11 217 S 6,827.41 Debt Sarvwo Cava{a Red* SCR -a07 -0.12 -0.12 -0.12 -0.14 -014 _ •0.14 N0.14 Atfd"t Ravttnua Nacasaa tot t.RS oSGR S 207 ,?99 .105 i 886.429 r.rN WC nserroptrrsxt ? .let ASSUMPTIONS Garage construtiitin cost S 7.141,786 Intones! Raas; 4.0^ W Costs (Le t, Finertwe. OWJ $ 7114.179 Amortttsboh Padod: 30 Rtnranue Controt equoment 0551 S 270,000 rota! Cast ow $Paw $16.058 Pelican Lot Pur&Asa (C+ty as4004) S 1,11 oo txlot Corolabutlon hum Parking Fund $ 0-000-oao) PROJECT CAST TO SE FINMCEA $ 9.125.965 Two Yuara of Cspitaazed Were% 6 902,117 TOTAL Ptt(3X CT COST TO BE FINANCED $ 9.028,082 NOTES 14) t'r r/rrt ttirratYr.OittpiKk NttGnats wict/d as antaoa w {{newt otfroa OaK3°4aviry diy. feto?i tfoittottrea pbkrtp tMt vwaRMdt. 021 w tseWttrotr welt ba taatrVrtriy dlputsa durlnp. srs tsfpaKnd nrtghtay catsYl.cao?, taateeoww garatyt CrrttM*M for io'rd(ri^tCS loo' wrh hwslaytry. t ta"d araipagw. IN I WS touts xaaem it4srimaw *80owets %ft Ww/o pv? in I* ttt an wait GWipm 1+1 Ibis spore ta{Yetents twr p"np ausaw or an wv#v ti p*wit to thm metd vsdtars 9woasp8ttaltum itttpravad WkWAasrt a0ldlr0 psttKrpfeputstersen WkIpA*16d W"ttin bra xWy area l51 tta tpvaRUfstR iriltutYrad Yam Wtesn 1YaFK t xslert tlPt, atntntt scaniri0 or ?tyw /711 P Mkhli a kae to r alctn YNk wslamsrt itl Thee LW W%" 11mme no p atinj or nu€ pltto {town. 171 operwino 04,4 ft" art ntr"Sw 1.5% aftoy. lei, TM UV isdarwonteaAlufi.ayw+eskatwto(eltM'016rmprgscfco". jolt TKa tart' aagwsud alai it orta be pplwixr d 1W M* IOU two Teats. and the *u pill Wttneol des Wray"ptrapa OW44. r 1 i. J 0 CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. V-4 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis • • DRAFT If the City decides to proceed with this garage, significant subsidies will be necessary under either scenario. These subsidies could be needed for the life of the garage, or hopefully for a shorter period of time if other developments are established in the study area. Supportive Actions to Promote Garage Use The negative financial scenarios detailed in the preceding pro-formae could be improved upon, to a degree, by the City undertaking a number of related actions that would help increase the number of garage patrons. These actions can be assumed to fall into one of three categories, namely: promotional, prohibitive, and preferential. Specifically, the City should actively promote use of the garage; induce customers to use the garage by strengthening deterrents to parking illegally, or unsafely in unregulated areas elsewhere; and make related improvements in garage access, amenities and pedestrian paths that would help the garage become a parking preference for North Beach visitors. Offered below are sample actions that could help achieve these objectives. "PROMOTIONAL" STRATEGIES ¦ Install signs on Mandalay Avenue leading to the garage. Significant signs on Mandalay Avenue need to lead drivers to the garage, particularly because the entrance to the garage will be from Baymont Street. Drivers heading north or south should see signs about the garage in time to turn on Baymont to find the garage entrance. ¦ Install real-time parking availability signs on other major public parking facilities, and wayfinding signs to the garage. Real-time LED signs should be installed at other Clearwater parking facilities indicating when the lots are full, and directing people to the Pelican Walk Garage. Wayfinding signs should be installed leading drivers easily from a) the roundabout, b) Pier 60 parking, c) lots 34, 35, 36, and 38, and perhaps other South Beach parking areas to the Pelican Walk Garage. ¦ Include the Pelican Garage in all Clearwater Beach promotional and informational materials. "INDUCEMENT" STRATEGIES ¦ Restore parking prohibitions on portions of blocks that were previously signed as "no- parking" zones. Conditions that should be taken into account include proximity to driveways, lane widths, sight angles, and pedestrian safety and traffic flow. As long as individuals may park on unregulated blocks for free, they will not park either at a parking meter or in the garage, thus avoiding either option that could contribute to the financial stability of the Department ¦ Increase enforcement to deter illegal parking. This will be possible due to the planned reorganization of parking enforcement under the Parking Facilities Manager, and the planned increase in the number of officers devoted to this function. ¦ Adjust parking meter hourly rates (for selected time periods), time limits and operating hours. Based on parking activity indicators of occupancy and turnover, consider raising the hourly meter fee in Lot 36, and shorten the meter time limit to a maximum of four hour parking. Increase operating hours in Lots 34 and 35 (as well as on the 360 block of Mandalay Avenue) to 8:00 p.m. daily, and to 11:00 p.m. on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Shorten the meter time limit in Lots 34 and 35 to two hour parking. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. V-5 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis DRAFT "PREFERENTIAL" STRATEGIES ¦ Eliminate selected on-street parking spaces that would impede access to the garage. On Baymont Street, approximately 20 angled parking spaces may need to be eliminated to ensure smooth traffic flow by providing a queuing lane into the garage, keeping traffic lanes open and moving. This would also prevent free parking adjacent to the garage. ¦ Improve pedestrian pathways from the garage to the beach. This is a major consideration, given the fact that what is presently the most direct access route to the beach from Pelican Walk (namely, the 020 block of Baymont Street) is narrow, dark, litter-strewn in parts, and is basically extremely unattractive for pedestrians. ¦ Consider placing enhanced customer amenities in the garage. For instance, as the garage should continue to serve as a stop for the Jolley Trolley, passenger waiting areas should be attractive, well-maintained and include both information and minor services that would set the garage apart from the ordinary. ¦ Work with the Jolley Trolley management company to adjust transit times and routes as warranted. Also consider advertising the Pelican Garage as a convenient "park-n-ride" during construction of the South Beach serpentine road, and as a way to encourage garage patronage by introducing South Beach visitors to the North Beach area. Finally, due to the garage's potential to increase traffic along Baymont Street where it intersects Mandalay Avenue, Poinsettia Avenue and East Shore Drive, and along neighboring streets that will carry traffic to the garage, the City should undertake a traffic study to determine the nature of additional roadway, pedestrian and vehicular safety enhancements that will be required. CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc. V-6 City of Clearwater Parking Demand and Garage Financial Feasibility Analysis Wells, Wayne From: Parry, Mark Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:44 PM To: Bahnick, Glen; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, Al; Cottier, Kristi; Debbie Richter; Donald Melone; Finch, Terry; Joseph Colbert; Leslie Dougall-Sides; Lisa Fierce; Martens, Cory; Michael Quillen; Morris, William; Randy Hinder; Rick Albee; Roberta Gluski; Tom Glenn; Wells, Wayne Subject: Case: FLS2002-08063 - 483 Mandalay Avenue I need comments today - make sure that your comment dates are updated - speak now or forever hold your peace Case: FLS2002-08063 - 483 Mandalay Avenue Owner: B.J.E. Inc. Applicant: Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler/ Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. Location: The 1.69-acre site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Request: Flexible Standard Development to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the sub'ect site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. i 1 i Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 6,300 square foot restaurant located within an existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff. Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tracey Bruch and Tom Glenn Applicant/Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler, Kevin Garden, Pete May, Ed Hooper, Louis Anastasopoulos and Nickolas Ekonomides The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Traffic engineering: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately reflect current site conditions with regards to dumpsters, parking spaces, landscape islands, etc. correct prior to D.O; applicant is working on a new survey/site plan b) Will any spaces be reserved (i.e. Take-Away Parking Only)? Applicant said they will have 2-3 reserved spaces c) Transportation Impact Fee to be paid prior to C.O. 3. General engineering: a) Double check backflow preventor device required if one doesn't exist. Applicable fees to be paid for by applicant prior to issuance of permit; if there is one, need to verify at time of building permit 4. Stormwater: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately depict current site conditions with regard to location of dumpsters, handicap parking spaces and landscape areas. Need revised site plan/survey prior to issuance of the Development Order showing the following: 1) Show the location of the two additional dumpsters currently on-site. Dumpsters will need to be screened from view in accordance with Solid Waste Department requirements; 2) Show landscape "diamonds" within the parking lot; 3) Show handicap parking upgraded to current Code requirements for numbers (4), design (12 feet wide with adjacent five foot walk aisle), location and signage; 4) City Code does not provide for compact parking. At least one shown on building floor plan layout to provide access from new corridor location to existing corridor/stairwell/elevator location; 5) Show on site plan revised/proposed building location. The northern corridor is being relocated and reduced in width. New exterior walls are proposed. Need to show all'proposed changes on site plan; 6) Show/indicate on site plan/survey second floor walkway on east side (indicated with a dashed line but not described); 7) Provide existing and proposed gross floor area and floor area ratio; a) Outdoor cafe (submit written information prior to issuance of Development Order): 1) Umbrellas cannot have signage (including logos or pictures advertising product) on them; 2) Will tables and chairs be permanently affixed to floor or be brought inside daily?; 3) Will be required to be kept clean; 4) Alcoholic beverages cannot 0 the licensed premises in an open container; • a) All new walls, windows and doors will be required to be flood proofed to 11 feet. Existing building is certified as flood proofed to 11 feet. Show prior to issuance of building permit; b) Parking calculations have been provided using the low end of the scale. Provide parking calculations using high end of scale (15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) prior to issuance of Development Order, including a revised narrative; ; C) Need a parking demand study prepared prior to Development Order: show how other, similarly situated restaurants (in tourist/beach areas) handle parking: include peak periods (Friday/Saturday evenings, peak days/holidays/spring break); take away parking; employee parking; potential valet parking; parking during construction of a potential parking garage; public parking areas already counted as part of other approved site plans cannot be used again; applicant would like a copy of the study prepared for the Frenchys restaurant expansion d) Provide responses to "restaurant" criteria prior to issuance of Development Order; e) Provide a full sign package including the area of the portion of the facade the business will occupy which faces Mandalay Avenue, the percentage of that area the sum of the area of all attached signs will constitute, prior to Development Order; f) Remodel plans must be consistent with the existing building (window and door type, exterior wall finish and color of building); g) Provide the value of the proposed project, prior to Development Order; 6. Solid waste: a) There is a concern with regards to the volume of solid waste - clarify that the existing dumpsters will be adequate to serve the proposed restaurant. 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) Need to upgrade dead/dying plant material on the site; b) Retrofit parking lot landscape diamonds with sabal palms and ornamental grass (recommend same grasses used by City - pennesitum); c) Explore opportunities to landscape along Poinsetta Avenue. NOTES: • Additional comments may be made as the site plans are finalized and at time of building permit review; • Email comments to Kevin at kevin arg_denna outback.com <mailto:kevin arden ,outback.com> and Nickolas at Nick@Eko- Law.com <mailto:Nick@Eko-Law.com>. • Provide copy of Frenchy's parking study to Nickolas DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. All required Transportation Impact Feed to be paid prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 2. That all Building Department requirements including but not limited to flood proofing be met prior to the issuance of any permits. • • Wells, Wayne From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Fierce, Lisa Subject: RE: Outback Restaurant please update me as soon as all DRC members have commented and we have prepared our response in planning- but no later than case review next week. thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:34 PM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: RE: Outback Restaurant Cyndi - Yes, they resubmitted last Friday. Mark/Lisa sent an email out to DRC members also on Friday to have them look at the resubmission. Lisa & Mark handled it since I was out of town. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:31 PM To: Fierce, Lisa; Wells, Wayne Subject: Outback Restaurant What is the status of this application? Have they resubmitted? Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 ctarapan@clearwater-fi.com 10:15 a.m. Case: FLS2002-08063 - 483 Mandalay Avenue' ; Owner: B.J.E. Inc. OCT 2002 't Applicant: Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. f Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler/ Outback Steakhouse of Florida,cv?tdlh;C Z ! ; r Location: The 1.69-acre site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenuaf`A15jirdximately 150' feet south of Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Request: Flexible Standard Development to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design.: otential reduction in parking Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 6,300 square foot restau aned wi ri existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tracey Bruch and Tom Glenn Applicant/Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler, Kevin Garden, Pete May, Ed Hooper, Louis Anastasopoulos and Nickolas Ekonomides The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Traffic engineering: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately reflect current site conditions with regards to dumpsters, parking spaces, landscape islands, etc. correct prior to D.O; applicant is working on a new survey/site plan b) Will any spaces be reserved (i.e. Take-Away Parking Only)? Applicant said they will have 2-3 reserved spaces c) Transportation Impact Fee to be paid prior to C.O. 3. General engineering: a) Double check backflow preventor device required if one doesn't exist. Applicable fees to be paid for by applicant prior to issuance of permit; if there is one, need to verify at time of building permit 4. Stormwater: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately depict current site conditions with regard to location of dumpsters, handicap parking spaces and landscape areas. Need revised site ' plan/survey prior to issuance of the Development Order showing the following: 1) Show the location of the two additional dumpsters currently on-site. Dumpsters will need to be screened from view in accordance with Solid Waste Department requirements; 2) Show landscape "diamonds" within the parking lot; 3) Show handicap parking upgraded to current Code requirements for numbers (4), design (12 feet wide with adjacent five foot walk aisle), location and signage; 4) City Code does not provide for compact parking. At least one shown on building floor plan layout to provide access from new corridor location to existing corridor/stairwell/elevator location; 5) Show on site plan revised/proposed building location. The northern corridor is being relocated and reduced in width. New exterior walls are proposed. Need to show all proposed changes on site plan; 6) Show/indicate on site plan/survey second floor walkway on east side (indicated with a dashed line but not described); 7) Provide existing and proposed gross floor area and floor area ratio; DRC action agenda - September 12, 2002 - Page 6 b) Outdoor cafe (submit written information prior to issuance of Development Order): 1) Umbrellas cannot have signage (including logos or pictures advertising product) on them; 2) Will tables and chairs be permanently affixed to floor or be brought inside daily?; 3) Will be required to be kept clean; 4) Alcoholic beverages cannot leave the licensed premises in an open container; C) All new walls, windows and doors will be required to be flood proofed to 11 feet. / Existing building is certified as flood proofed to 11 feet. Show prior to issuance of v building permit; d) Parking calculations have been provided using the low end of the scale. Provide parking calculations using high end of scale (15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) prior to issuance of Development Order, including a revised narrative; ; e) Need a parking demand study prepared prior to Development Order: show how other, similarly situated restaurants (in tourist/beach areas) handle parking: include peak periods (Friday/Saturday evenings, eak a s/hold s/?i a e away parking; ict employee parking; potential e p r g; ar ingfdri gion of a potential Parking garage; public parking areas already counted as part of other approved site plans cannot be used again; applicant would like a copy of the study prepared for the Frenchys restaurant expansion f) Provide responses to "restaurant" criteria prior to issuance of Development Order; g) Provide a full sign package including the area of the portion of the fagade the business will occupy which faces Mandalay Avenue, the percentage of that area the sum of the area of all attached signs will constitute, prior to Development Order; h) Remodel plans must be consistent with the existing building (window and door type, exterior wall finish and color of building); i) Provide the value of the proposed project, prior to Development Order; 6. Solid waste: a) There is a concern with regards to the volume of solid waste - clarify that the existing dumpsters will be adequate to serve the proposed restaurant. 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. L dsca in : a) Need to upgrade dead/dying plant material on the site; b) Retrofit parking lot landscape diamonds with sabal palms and ornamental grass `. (recommend same grasses used by City - pennesitum); c) Explore opportunities to landscape along Poinsetta Avenue. NOTES: • Additional comments may be made as the site plans are finalized and at time of building permit review; • Email comments to Kevin at kevingarden@outback.com and Nickolas at Nick@Eko-Law.com. • Provide copy of Frenchy's parking study to Nickolas DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. All required Transportation Impact Feed to be paid prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 2. That all Building Department requirements including but not limited to flood proofing be met prior to the issuance of any permits. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- -1 1 art ??? % kl W Yin -? -? DRC action agenda - September 12, 2002 - Page 7 Wells, Wayne From: Parry, Mark Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:45 AM To: Bahnick, Glen; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, Al; Cottier, Kristi; Debbie Richter; Donald Melone; Finch, Terry; Joseph Colbert; Leslie Dougall-Sides; Lisa Fierce; Martens, Cory; Michael Quillen; Morris, William; Randy Hinder; Rick Albee; Roberta Gluski; Tom Glenn; Wells, Wayne Subject: Case: FLS2002-08063 - 483 Mandalay Avenue Revised site plans are in - I need comments in PP by next Wednesday 10:15 a.m. Case: FLS2002-08063 - 483 Mandalay Avenue Owner: B.J.E. Inc. Applicant: Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler/ Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. Location: The 1.69-acre site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Request: Flexible Standard Development to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. ? Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 6,300 square foot restaurant located within an existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff. Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tracey Bruch and Tom Glenn Applicant/Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler, Kevin Garden, Pete May, Ed Hooper, Louis Anastasopoulos and Nickolas Ekonomides The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Traffic engineering: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately reflect current site conditions with regards to dumpsters, parking spaces, landscape islands, etc. correct prior to D.O; applicant is working on a new survey/site plan b) Will any spaces be reserved (i.e. Take-Away Parking Only)? Applicant said they will have 2-3 reserved spaces c) Transportation Impact Fee to be paid prior to C.O. 3. General engineering: a) Double check backflow preventor device required if one doesn't exist. Applicable fees to be paid for by applicant prior to issuance of permit; if there is one, need to verify at time of building permit 4. Stormwater• a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately depict current site conditions with regard to location of dumpsters, handicap parking spaces and landscape areas. Need revised site plan/survey prior to issuance of the Development Order showing the following: 1) Show the location of the two additional dumpsters currently on-site. Dumpsters will need to be screened from view in accordance with Solid Waste Department requirements; 2) Show landscape "diamonds" within the parking lot; 3) Show handicap parking upgraded to current Code requirements for numbers (4), design (12 feet wide with adjacent five foot walk aisle), location and signage; 4) City Code does not provide for compact parking. At least one shown on building floor plan layout to provide access from new corridor location to existing corridor/stairwell/elevator location; 5) Show on site plan revised/proposed building location. The northern corridor is being relocated and reduced in width. New exterior walls are proposed. Need to show all proposed changes on site plan; 6) Show/indicate on site plan/survey second floor walkway on east side (indicated with a dashed line but not described); 7) Provide existing and proposed gross floor area and floor area ratio; a) Outdoor cafe (submit written information prior to issuance of Development Order): 1) Umbrellas cannot have signage (including logos or pictures advertising product) on them; 2) Will tables and chairs be permanently affixed to floor or be brought inside daily?; 3) Will be required to be kept CIO • 4) Alcoholic beverages cannot leave the licensed premises in an open container; a) All new walls, windows and doors will be required to be flood proofed to 11 feet. Existing building is certified as flood proofed to 11 feet. Show prior to issuance of building permit; b) Parking calculations have been provided using the low end of the scale. Provide parking calculations using high end of scale (15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) prior to issuance of Development Order, including a revised narrative; ; C) Need a parking demand study prepared prior to Development Order: show how other, similarly situated restaurants (in tourist/beach areas) handle parking: include peak periods (Friday/Saturday evenings, peak days/holidays/spring break); take away parking; employee parking; potential valet parking; parking during construction of a potential parking garage; public parking areas already counted as part of other approved site plans cannot be used again; applicant would like a copy of the study prepared for the Frenchys restaurant expansion d) Provide responses to "restaurant" criteria prior to issuance of Development Order; e) Provide a full sign package including the area of the portion of the fagade the business will occupy which faces Mandalay Avenue, the percentage of that area the sum of the area of all attached signs will constitute, prior to Development Order; f) Remodel plans must be consistent with the existing building (window and door type, exterior wall fmish and color of building); g) Provide the value of the proposed project, prior to Development Order; 6. Solid waste: a) There is a concern with regards to the volume of solid waste - clarify that the existing dumpsters will be adequate to serve the proposed restaurant. 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) Need to upgrade dead/dying plant material on the site; b) Retrofit parking lot landscape diamonds with sabal palms and ornamental grass (recommend same grasses used by City - pennesitum); c) Explore opportunities to landscape along Poinsetta Avenue. NOTES: • Additional comments may be made as the site plans are finalized and at time of building permit review; • Email comments to Kevin at kevingarden@outback.com <mailto:kevin arg den@outback.com> and Nickolas at Nick@Eko- Law.com <mailto:Nick@Eko-Law.com>. • Provide copy of Frenchy's parking study to Nickolas DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. All required Transportation Impact Feed to be paid prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 2. That all Building Department requirements including but not limited to flood proofing be met prior to the issuance of any permits. • C. Wells, Wayne From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Schodtler, John; Dittmer, Arden; Wells, Wayne; Parry, Mark Subject: FW: hielman's/mandalay fyi Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department Ifierce@clearwater-fl.com 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:52 AM To: Fierce, Lisa Subject: FW: hielman's/mandalay fyi-just in case he comes in for any of these improvements. thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Arasteh, Mahshid Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:29 AM To: Stone, Ralph; Wilson, Denise A.; Phillips, Sue; Kurtz, Timothy M. Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: RE: hielman's/mandalay Thanks Ralph, Pls let Tim or someone from PWA attend these meetings always. Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E. Public Works Administrator City of Clearwater -----Original Message----- From: Stone, Ralph Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:20 AM To: Wilson, Denise A.; Phillips, Sue; Arasteh, Mahshid; Kurtz, Timothy M. Subject: hielman's/mandalay met w bob heilman and this architect again this morning and resolved the questions re. the streetscape project and his request for modifications; here are the decisions: 1. the pavers that he had previously been approved for will be replaced at his front door to the edge of curb 2. we will not approved an alternative tree in the right of way; cabbage palms will be used uniformly 3. he will be adding paver on the north side of his small building that will "extend" his outdoor seating area; the pavers will continue the existing "line"; he will work w tim re. the demo of the concrete and pavement in the area 4. the city will develop a sidewalk cafe ordinance that will allow seating in the rights-of-way; however all agreed that with the limited width of the sidewalk there may not be enough room for any tables tim kurtz attended also and was very helpful explaining the issues re. pavers and landscape options; heilman was disappointed that all of his requests we not approved, but was satisfied that we did all we could and fully explained our positions to his satisfication; call me or tim if questions 1 ti 0 0 Mandalay Median on a separate issue tim indicated that some of the owners are complaining about lack of curb cuts in the median; i stongly suggest we Do Not create additional cuts to accomodate these requests; a key component of the project is limiting vehicles and ped.s from crossing, u-turns; and left turns; this is a pedestrian area and people need to go to the intersections both on foot and in vehicles Case Acti it Li ti 9/11/2002 ng v y s 5:37:OOPM T I D E M A R K Case #: FLS2002-08063 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. 483 MANDALAY AVE 115 Assigned Done Updated Activity Description Dated Date2 Date3 Hold Disp To By By Notes FLSD070 Traffic Eng Review 8/22/2002 9/9/2002 None DONE C_M 9/9/2002 Pelican Walk currently has only 98 useable parking spaces M C including handicap spaces and four spaces reserved exclusively _ for police. use Will any spaces be reserved (i.e. Take-Away Parking Only)? What happens to parking during construction of proposed parking garage? Transportation Impact Fee to be paid prior to C. 0. FLSD080 Engineering Review 8/22/2002 None HOLD MEL 9/6/2002 1) Double check backflow preventor device required if one RLG doesn't exist. Applicable fees to be paid for by applicant. 2) Check with utilities. • FLSA245 Documents attached in 8/22/2002 None 8/22/2002 PPlan JVS FLSA235 Letter To Abutting Prop 8/22/2002 None 8/22/2002 Owner JVS FLSA230 Letter of Completeness 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 None DONE MTP 8/26/2002 MTP FLSA244 D.O. Mailed Out 8/22/2002 None 8/22/2002 JVS FLSA018 Tree Survey Recd 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 HwO DONE MTP 8/26/2002 n/a MT? • FLSA130 Map Created 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 None DONE MTP 8/26/2002 n/a MTP FLSA016 Drainage Calculation 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 HwO DONE MTP 8/26/2002 n/a Recd MTP FLSA015 Verify Traffic Impact 8/22/2002 HwO 8/22/2002 Fees JVS Page 1 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt -?? T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLS2002-08063 483 MANDALAY AVE 115 9/11/2002 5:37:01PM r Assigned Done Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3' : Hold Disp To By By Notes FLSD060 Legal Review 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 None DONE MTP 8/26/2002 n/a MTP FLSD050 Land Resource Review 8/22/2002 9/9/2002 None DONE R_A 9/9/2002 n/a RA FLSDO10 Storrawater Review 8/22/2002 9/4/2002 None DONE EES 9/4/2002 EES FLSD020 Fire Review 8/22/2002 9/9/2002 None DONE J_C 9/9/2002 No Comments J -C FLSD030 Park & Rec Review 8/22/2002 9/6/2002 None DONE DWR 9/6/2002 No P&R Comment since using existing floor area DWR FLSD040 Solid Waste Review 8/22/2002 9/6/2002 None DONE TJG 9/6/2002 Please indicate how solid waste is disposed off TJG FLSA140 Site Visit 8/22/2002 None 8/22/2002 JVS FLSA010 Application received 8/22/2002 None DONE JVS 8/26/2002 MT? • FLSD012 Zoning Review 8/22/2002 None 8/22/2002 JVS FLSD014 Landscaping Review 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 None DONE MT? 8/26/2002 n/a MTP FLSD090 Harbor Master Review 8/22/2002 8/26/2002 None DONE MT? 8/26/2002 n/a MTP Page 2 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt Case Activity Listing 9/11/2002 5:37:OOPM T I D E M A R K Case #: FLS2002-08063 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. 483 MANDALAY AVE 115 Assigned Done Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp s To By By Notes FLSD042 Environmental Review 8/22/2002 9/10/2002 None DONE MTP 9/10/2002 MTP • Page 3 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt 9/11/2002 Conditions Associated With • 5:37:27PM T I D E M A R K Case #: FLS2002-08063 COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. 483 MANDALAY AVE 115 Condition Status Updated I Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By TERI Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET TERI 9/11/2002 C_M Site Plan/Survey does not accurately reflect existing site conditions with regards to dumpsters, parking spaces, landscape islands, etc. - correct prior to D.O. TER1 Traffic Eng Condition Wam NOT MET TERI 9/11/2002 C_M Transportation Impact Fees to be paid prior to C.O. Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..rpt CITY OF CLEARWATER 9/20/2002 ,Ir LANNING AN ELOPMENT SERVICES _ MUNICI SERVI ES?1 D , 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE P OFFI 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 T ephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 FLD 00-07-29 APR 7 ROCKAWAY ST Flexible Development approval to reduce the front Cem_1 feet to-zer eet, reduce the rear setback from 10 feet to zero feet and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. FLD 01-03-15 FLD 01-05-18 FLD 01-09-31 FLD 02-02-03 FLD 99-10-18 APR 47 BAYMONT ST Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (east) setback along Poi the side (sout ac c ee o 1.33 feet, and to allow the conkinuati Program APR 13 CAMBRIA ST Fe t Aven from 15 feet to two feet; reduce f t non-conforming parking space sect with Comprehensive Landscape Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot size from 15,000 sf to 4,350 sf and reduce the side setback from 10 feet to 5 feet and to allow a parking design other than what is required by Code, as part of a residential infill project. APR 501 MANDALAY AVE Flexible Development approval to permit the following within the (pending) HDR, High Density Residential District, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-504: Increase in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200 units under the provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status as a Nonconformity; Increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130 feet; Increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99 feet; Reduction in the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement; Reduction in the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement; Reduction in the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement; Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to 18 feet for building; and Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to zero feet for pavement. APR 18 GLENDALE ST Flexible Development approval to reduce the required front (south) setback from 25 feet to 1.6 feet (to deck) along Glendale Street and to reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 1.9 feet (to deck) under the provisions of Section 2-403. APR 10 PAPAYA ST • Flexible development approval to allow attached dwellings on the site known as the Mandalay Beach Club located at 10 Papaya Street and 11 San Marco Street as a Comprehensive Infill Project with front setbacks on Papaya and San Marcos Streets of zero (0) feet, the easterly side setback of zero (0) feet and a height if one-hundred and forty-five (145) feet. • Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) approval to allow the transfer of nine (9) Development Rights from Barbour-Morrow Subdivision; Block A, Lots 5, 6 and 40, Pinellas County to Lots 14 through 42, Clearwater Beach Park FLD2002-07018 APR 442 MANDALAY AVE Flexible Development application approval to reduce the required front (east and south) setbacks along Mandalay Avenue and Papaya Street, respectively, from 10 feet to 2.5 feet, provide a side (north) setback of zero feet and provide a side (west) setback of three feet and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 57 spaces to zero spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803. ' U:\CR\PPLAN2.6. I \outback FLD parking.rpt 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:42 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Wells, Wayne; Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: need a report run can you run a report that shows all the approved variances/reductions for parking in the area between the roundabout up to palm pavillion area? trying to find out how many cases for which we approved reductions and allowed businesses to count city parking lots/on street spaces; i need to share this with the outback folks... Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department Ifierce@clearwater-fl.com 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax W Z 0 CL J FOR _ M OF? U PHONE/ MOBILE MESSAGE SIG '242-- 2 DATE .-FL_j TELEPHONED RETURNED YOUR CALL MPffA--SE CALL WILL CALL AGAIN CAME TO SEE YOU ? WANTS TO SEE YOU 1 f ? Wells, Wayne From: Haines, Angel Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Outback Wayne, Kevin Garden w/ Outback would like a copy of the survey that French'y did regarding parking. He is flexible in receiving it, whether it's small enough to fax or he can come p/u. His phone # is (813) 282-1225. Thx. Angel Haines Temp - Senior Staff Assistant Planning Department City of Clearwater (727) 562-4579 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ?'Q -l [_?, Gt!- dam-., _ FAX: a l 3- Z F3 Z- C).Lj 5. Phone: t 13 - 2, 2) Z - 1 1-7's NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) FROM: Phone: 72-7 ' S U Z - +S-04- DATE:. 17 O L RE: ?-S 3 IlF.-a.. *ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 09/17/2002 17:20 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE DIME 09/17 17:10 FAX N0./NAME 98132829195 DURATION 00:09:42 PAGE(S) 16 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM 06/18'/2000 FRI 10:36 FAX 72^ 4 8606 FDC Clearwater 2002/002 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.. ?• f?- `f ENGINEERS ENVIRONMEN ZALISM, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS re ` ., ,t•Y1 - - .• :' Uri' ?;? ?1,?? ?? ?`'' %' -. .. - August 18, 2000. Mr. Mark Parry, Planner 0 City of Clearwater Manning Department . 100 S•. Myrtle Avenue,- 2"d Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Frenchy's,Rockaway Grill - Parking Analysis Dear Mr. Parry:, Per our discussion I, am providing this correspondence to request confirmation of the methodology for . conducting a parking analysis for the proposed- expansion of Frenchy's Rockaway Grill.: As you know, this: site-currently contains thirteen (13) on-site parking spaces and currently contains'.6,'723.'square feet of gross floor area. As with many beach businesses they rely on off-site parking-including municipal lots and on- street parking spaces to sat sfyparking demand. These municipal lots and on-street public parking spaces serve-both beach goers and customers of beach businesses: It is also reasonable to assume that a substantial portion of the customers are "Walk-ups" from the beach, bicyclists, or.have walked from•nearby hotel§ and therefore do not-contribute to:the parking demand. Due to these•unique characteristics the code requirement for parking spaces should not apply to-this expansion. . As discussed; FDC will -conduct a parking accumulation .survey at hourly. increments on a Friday and 'Saturday between the hours•of 11:00 AM -;10:00•PM.. The'study area will include-Frenchy's parking lot; municipal lot #36; on-street parking along Rockaway Street, on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade'and Baymont-Street on-street parking along Bay Esplanade, and municipal lot #38. Each of these'locations is within 1,000 feef walking distance -of Frenchy's, and I have confirmed•thesc are all public spaces with Tracy Brooks. The study will chart',par1#g accumulation and availability (or lack thereof.) of spaces to serve the proposed expansion of 3,487 s.£' and the information will be charted-on an' hourly basis. ; ?A written report willbe prepared and,submitted for your review, I will also be available to present findings at future DRC•or CDB meetings. Please notify me-ofyour agreement with this proposal methodology or if any changes,are recommended. Your immediate attention to this matter is appreciitcd. Sincerely, ::: -=--- ------- - Robert C. Ago ? AICP F -- - -^ Vice President) Transportation A Planning ? - 8 'CP cc: `Don McGahan' Ed Armstrong- 2639 McCORMICK.DRIVE• CLl_ARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 . File 997-91 Tel: (727) 724-8422 Fax: (72) 724-8606 PARKING ANALYSIS FOR FRENCHY'S ROCKAWAY GRILL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared for: KIRK CONSTRUCTION Prepared by- FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. AUGUST, 2000 FDC PROJECT #997-91 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION II. METHODOLOGY III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH EXPANSION V. CONCLUSION APPENDIX .. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP #9023 I. INTRODUCTION Frenchy's Rockaway Grill is planning to expand their facility which is located at the west end of Rockaway Street west of Mandalay Avenue (See Figure 1). The restaurant currently contains 6,723 square feet and will be expanded by constructing a 3,487 square foot roof- top deckibar. Frenchy's is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district and due to site constraints has 13 on-site parking spaces. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code requires a minimum parking requirement of 7 spaces/1000 s.f. According to strict interpretation of the code, the existing Frenchy's restaurant would require 47 parking spaces and after the proposed expansion would require 72 parking spaces. According to the code there is a parking space deficiency. The code does provide for reducing the required number of on-site parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in required parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required, and if adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. City of Clearwater staff has recognized that Frenchy's is located adjacent to municipal parking lots, on-street parking spaces, and has strong potential for beach "walk-up" customers. The staff also recognizes that the public parking spaces serve two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide parking for beach related businesses. The applicant believes the addition of a roof-top deck would not significantly alter parking demand and adequate parking exists within a reasonable distance to support the proposed expansion. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces and to ascertain characteristics of typical Frenchy's customers. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed that FDC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday and Saturday between the hours of 11:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. The study area included Frenchy's parking lot, Municipal Lot #36, Municipal Lot # 38, on-street parking on Rockaway Street, on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue between Baymont Street and Bay Esplanade, and on-street parking along Bay Esplanade. These areas include a total of 309 parking spaces ofwhich 9 are designated for handicapped parking. In addition, as requested of City staff, 100 customer surveys were obtained to determine the parking characteristics of Frenchy's customers. A copy of the parking space layout and custoiner survey used for the study are included in Appendix A. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 11:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. on Friday, August 25 and Saturday August 26, 2000. Both days were sunny and hot representing typical August weather where there would be considerable beach crowds. A brief thunderstorm occurred on Saturday between 7:00 and 7:40 PM. The parking lots within walking distance of Frenchy's were checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The location of each occupied space was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study area. R `,French,/s Rockaway Grill.wpd h, 4 uu- : 1 It ?h ?. t` i ; 1 ?i .t. a T?! , 4 :Y 1F ?It ?? t "r 9 ? l 7 ? S y? { A? ? t rt ? riY??S is ?t FRENCHY'S ?Li. '. H tl1 ? . ?? L I FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. N ENGINEER''.,, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 2639 McCormlck Or. Clearwater FL. 33759 Tel: (813) 721-8122 - Fa¦: (813)721-8606 0 50 .100 200 Frenchy's parking lot which is located on the east side of the restaurant on Rockaway Street contains 13 parking spaces. The main parking facilities that serve Frenchy's and other businesses are two city municipal lots. Municipal Lot 36 contains 145 metered parking spaces and 5 handicap spaces. This lot is located directly in front of Frenchy's and is bordered by Rockaway Street, Mandalay Avenue and Bay Esplanade. Municipal Lot 38 contains 79 metered parking spaces and 4 handicap spaces. This lot is located east of Mandalay Avenue on the south side of Bay Esplanade. There also is on- street parking located on Rockaway Street (20 spaces), Mandalay Avenue (22 spaces) and Bay Esplanade (21 spaces) which are all metered parking. Friday. August 25, 2000 Parking demand varied significantly throughout the day with a low of 102 occupied spaces (33%) at 11 A.M. to a peak demand of 241 occupied spaces (78%) at 8 P.M. As such, there were a minimum of 68 unused spaces in the study area throughout the day. Closer analysis shows Frenchy's lot, Municipal Lot #36, and on-street parking spaces on Rockaway Street are mostly occupied throughout the day, however, on-street parking was available on Mandalay Avenue and Bay Esplanade, and Municipal Lot #3 8 was severely underutilized. Table 1 provides on hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Saturday, August 26. 2000 Parking demand varied only slightly as the studied parking areas reached 79% of capacity by 1 P.M. and continued at or above 79% of capacity throughout the afternoon until after 4 P.M. The peak occurred at 2 P.M. with 264 occupied spaces (85%) and, as such, there was a minimum of 45 unused spaces in the study area throughout the day. Unlike Friday when there was a separate evening peak, demand on Saturday slowly declined throughout the evening hours, with the spaces finally being only 56% full at 10 P.M. This is typical as it represents a Saturday beach crowd during the afternoon. As was the case on Friday, Frenchy's lot, Municipal Lot #36, and on-street parking on Rockaway Street were mostly occupied, however, on-street parking.was available on Mandalay Avenue and Bay Esplanade, and Municipal Lot #38 was underutilized. Table 2 provides on hourly tabulation and Figure 3 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. In addition, FDC also observed traffic patterns through the two large municipal lots. The traveling public would first drive through Municipal Lot 3 6 trying to locate an available parking space. If the lot was fall, they would directly proceed onto Municipal Lot 38 where a space would be available.--- It was also observed that people that visit Palm Pavilion would follow this same pattern as well. Customer Survevs As was requested 100 customer surveys were obtained during normal business hours to determine the parking and automobile occupancy characteristics. A customer survey summary is shown in Table 4. Of the 100 surveys completed, ten of the respondents walked, 88 drove and 2 used a bus or boat. Of the 100 surveys, 49 stated the primary reason for visiting Clearwater Beach was to go to the beach, and eating/drinking at Frenchy's was merely a sidestop. RAFrenchvs Rockaway Grill.w)d -7- Table 1 FRIDAY AUGUST 25,. 2000 FRENC HY'S LOT *MUNICIP A ... -v " I rrar[ni ivu TIME OCC TOTAL OCC L LOT # 36 TOTAL ROCK AWAY MAND ALAY BAY ES PLANADE *MUNICIPAL LOT # 38 11:00 AM 6 13 CO- 150 OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC TOTAL 12:00 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 9 10 11 13 13 13 149 148 146 150 150 150 12 17 18 20 20 20 0 0 8 22 22 22 2 0 4 21 21 21 2 6 13 83 83 83 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 11 11 13 13 133 92 150 150 19 18 20 20 6 2 22 22 5 5 21 21 14 6 83 83 5:00 PM 8 13 91 150 17 20 0 22 .1 21 9 83 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 13 13 12 12 13 13 13 13 130 148 150 119 150 150 150 150 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 1 5 8 22 22 22 22 22 2 2 3 7 21 21 21 21 8 7 13 30 83 83 83 83 10:00 PM 12 13 98 150 17 19 20 20 9 7 22 22 .12 1 21 21 25 11 83 83 *INCLUDES 5 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #36 *INCLUDES 4 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #38 TOTAL OCC TOTAL % OCCUP 102 181 309 309 33% 59% 201 309 65% 201 175 309 309 65% 57% 130 309 42% 130 177 309 309 42% 57% 205 309 66% 241 309 78% 194 309 63% 148 309 48% 0 90% 0 80% 70% v 60% 50% z 40% U 30% 20% o- 10% 0% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Q n a- a_ cl- n n a- n n n 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r' N ?- N c? d' in cfl i? 00 (5i O TIME FIGURE 2 40 0 PERCENT OCCUPANCY FOR FRIDAY AUGUST 25, 2000 s Y. ' Table 2 SATURDAY AUGUST 26, 2000 ON -STREET PARKI NG FRENCHY'S LOT *MUNIC TIME OCC TOTAL IPAL LOT # 36 OCC TO ROCKAWAY MANDALAY BAY ESPLANADE *MUNICIPAL LOT # 38 TOTAL 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 2 9 13 13 125 150 TAL 150 150 OCC 13 TOTAL 20 OCC 0 TOTAL 22 OCC 0 TOTAL 21 OCC 2 TOTAL 83 OCC 142 TOTAL 309 % OCCUPIED 46% 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 12 13 13 13 148 150 150 150 9 19 20 20 20 22 22 22 2 8 21 21 9 36 83 83 199 245 309 309 64% 79% 3:00 PM 13 13 147 5 20 20 17 22 11 21 53. 83 264 309 85% 4:00 PM 13 13 148 1 0 1 0 20 20 19 22 11 21 51 83 261 309. 84% 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 13 13 13 13 146 144 5 150 150 20 20 20 20 17 10 22 22 7 6 21 21 40 14 83 83 245. 209 309 309 79% 68% 7:00 PM 13 13 127 150 20 20 10 22 3 21 8 83 198 309 64% 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 13 13 13 13-L 125 117 150 150 20 20 20 20 18 9 22 22 3 5 21 21 16 19 83 83 197 191 309 309 64% 62% 10:00 PM 13 13 F 101 20 20 6 22 9 21 18 83 183 309 59% 150 20 20 10 22 4 21 24 83 172 309 56% *INCLUDES 5 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #36 *INCLUDES 4 HANDICAPPED SPACES IN MUNICIPAL LOT #38 9 PERCENT OCCUPANCY FOR ,, SATURDAY AUGUST 26, 2000 100% w 90% 80% 70% 60% C 50% Z 40% 30% W 20% CL 10% 0% Q cl- a_ n n n I a_ n a- f O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co d' Lo Co f? 00 a) O r- t- r- TIME FIGURE 3 40 Of the 88 survey respondents that drove to the beach, 18(20.5%) parked in Frenchy's lot, 53 (60.2%) parked in public lots and 17 (19.3%) used on-street parking. The average auto-occupancy was 2.9 persons per vehicle. The customer surveys confirm that existing Frenchy's customers are primarily at the beach for another reason, and as is typical of beachgoers and beach business customers, most rely on public parking. IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH EXPANSION The proposed expansion to include a 3,487 square foot roof-top deck/bar would require 25 spaces according to strict interpretation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. Assuming the worst case (Saturday 2PM) a minimum of 45 spaces are available to satisfy any additional parking demand created by the proposed expansion, therefore there is adequate parking available to support the expansion. The customer surveys yielded interesting results that shed light on actual parking demand requirements for beach businesses. While the Community Development Code considers a minimum requirement of 7 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of floor area for restaurants in the tourist district, no consideration is given to the fact that many customers have no parking demand. This is due to the fact that "beach walkups" are prevalent. At least 12% of Frenchy's customers did not drive a car to Clearwater Beach, in addition the surveys demonstrated only 49% of Frenchys customers made the trip to specifically visit Frenchys. Given this information the City of Clearwater may wish to ! consider reducing automobile parking requirements for beach related restaurants. V. CONCLUSION This parking analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater staff. This analysis shows of the total 309 parking spaces included in the study area a maximum of 264 were occupied during any hour of the day. As such, adequate parking is available within a reasonable walking distance of Frenchys to support the addition of the proposed roof-top deck. Also, additional parking is expected to be constructed near Pelican Walk South of Baymont Street in the future. R:'.Frcnchy's Rockaway Grill.wpd '?- i Table 4 CUSTOMER SURVEY SUMMARY MODE OF TRANSPORTATION WALKED DROVE OTHER TOTAL % WALKED % DROVE % OTHER 10 88 2 100 10.00% 88.00% 2.00% AREA PARKED FRENCHY'S LOT PUBLIC LOT OFF-STREET SPACES % FRENCHY'S % PUBLIC LOTS % ON STREET PARKING 18 53 17 20.50% 60.20% 19.30% AUTO OCCUPANCY 1PERSON 0 2 50 3+ 38 AVERAGE OCC. 2.9 PRIMARY REASON FOR VISITING CLEARWATER BEACH PFRr`FNT nr-QTIAIATInKI SPECIFICALLY VISIT FRENCHY'S 49 49.00% GO TO THE BEACH 49 49.00% OTHER 2 2.00% 40 • G R • APPENDIX A u ?J;2 r ?r r a r r M < tf? ?1 •i ti r r1 S. t;. Yry't1f `, M(.. i FI FNCHYI ' tz tw+• kk llFl' ,N ,, q f JT' xo r? S.?r "S A ?1`i 4,Y ' ' ? it Yi? i iS )+ rt + 4 1 SS 1 if? a ?' AY ?? V ? . ? f?n?? r,S .1 i 1 p?r•f( ? !! ?, , , / • ?F r rla rr, ? ' r fi'x /j ( . ?? ?? ? :? , r f ? ? ?. ? j, rye r k . , 1?/?yy f/ 1 "tibf F 4 I ... ,. {., fs ,Jr. S 7r +uf?Jy + . N =LORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. N rdie 3) 724 8422 Fac feu)124-beoe NOT TO SCALE i' FRENCHY'S ROCKAWAY GRILL CUSTOMER SURVEY In order to serve you better, we request you complete this survey and return it to your waiter/waitress. 1. What mode of transportation did you take to get to Frenchy's Rockaway Grill? WALK DRIVE CAR OTHER (please specify). 2. If you drove a car where did you park? ? Frenchy's Lot ? Public Parking Lot ? On-Street Parking Spaces ? Other (Please Specify) _ 3. If you drove, how many people (including yourself) were in your car? 4. What was your primary reason and ultimate destination for coming to. Clear vater Beach today? O Visit Frenchy's ? Go To The Beach ? Other (Please Specify) 5. Day Time Of Day Thank you for visiting Frenchy's Rockaway Grill. QA997-9l-customer survey,wpd '1? 0 0 10:15 a.m. Case: FLS2002-08063 - 483 Mandalay Avenue ) Owner: B.J.E. Inc. Applicant: Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler/ Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. Location: The 1.69-acre site is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Request: Flexible Standard Development to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. Fellil rcdn1tJ010n parkin', Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 6,300 square foot restaurant located within an existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tracey Bruch and Tom Glenn Applicant/Representative: Mr. Jamie Butler, Kevin Garden, Pete May, Ed Hooper, Louis Anastasopoulos and Nickolas Ekonomides The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Traffic engineering: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately reflect current site conditions with regards to dumpsters, parking spaces, landscape islands, etc. correct prior to D.O; applicant is working on a new survey/site plan b) Will any spaces be reserved (i.e. Take-Away Parking Only)? Applicant said they will have 2-3 reserved spaces c) Transportation Impact Fee to be paid prior to C.O. 3. General engineering: a) Double check backflow preventor device required if one doesn't exist. Applicable fees to be paid for by applicant prior to issuance of permit; if there is one, need to verify at time of building permit 4. Stormwater: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Site plan/survey does not accurately depict current site conditions with regard to location of dumpsters, handicap parking spaces and landscape areas. Need revised site plan/survey prior to issuance of the Development Order showing the following: 1) Show the location of the two additional dumpsters currently on-site. Dumpsters will need to be screened from view in accordance with Solid Waste Department requirements; 2) Show landscape "diamonds" within the parking lot; 3) Show handicap parking upgraded to current Code requirements for numbers (4), design (12 feet wide with adjacent five foot walk aisle), location and signage; 4) City Code does not provide for compact parking. At least one shown on building floor plan layout to provide access from new corridor location to existing corridor/stairwell/elevator location; 5) Show on site plan revised/proposed building location. The northern corridor is being relocated and reduced in width. New exterior walls are proposed. Need to show all proposed changes on site plan; 6) Show/indicate on site plan/survey second floor walkway on east side (indicated with a dashed line but not described); 7) Provide existing and proposed gross floor area and floor area ratio; -1 ff L DRC action agenda - September 12, 2002 - Page 6 ?' F?LE_ 0 0 b) Outdoor cafe (submit written information prior to issuance of Development Order): 1) Umbrellas cannot have signage (including logos or pictures advertising product) on them; 2) Will tables and chairs be permanently affixed to floor or be brought inside daily?; 3) Will be required to be kept clean; 4) Alcoholic beverages cannot leave the licensed premises in an open container; C) All new walls, windows and doors will be required to be flood proofed to 11 feet. Existing building is certified as flood proofed to 11 feet. Show prior to issuance of building permit; d) Parking calculations have been provided using the low end of the scale. Provide parking calculations using high end of scale (15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) prior to issuance of Development Order, including a revised narrative; ; e) Need a parking demand study prepared prior to Development Order: show how other, similarly situated restaurants (in tourist/beach areas) handle parking: include peak periods (Friday/Saturday evenings, peak days/holidays/spring break); take away parking; employee parking; potential valet parking; parking during construction of a potential parking garage; public parking areas already counted as part of other approved site plans cannot be used again; applicant would like a copy of the study prepared for the Frenchys restaurant expansion f) Provide responses to "restaurant" criteria prior to issuance of Development Order; g) Provide a full sign package including the area of the portion of the fagade the business will occupy which faces Mandalay Avenue, the percentage of that area the sum of the area of all attached signs will constitute, prior to Development Order; h) Remodel plans must be consistent with the existing building (window and door type, exterior wall finish and color of building); i) Provide the value of the proposed project, prior to Development Order; 6. Solid waste: a) There is a concern with regards to the volume of solid waste - clarify that the existing dumpsters will be adequate to serve the proposed restaurant. 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) Need to upgrade dead/dying plant material on the site; b) Retrofit parking lot landscape diamonds with sabal palms and ornamental grass (recommend same grasses used by City - pennesitum); c) Explore opportunities to landscape along Poinsetta Avenue. NOTES: • Additional comments may be made as the site plans are finalized and at time of building permit review; Email comments to Kevin at kevingarden@outback.com and Nickolas at Nick@Eko-Law.com. Provide copy of Frenchy's parking study to Nickolas DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. All required Transportation Impact Feed to be paid prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 2. That all Building Department requirements including but not limited to flood proofing be met prior to the issuance of any permits. DRC action agenda - September 12, 2002 - Page 7 From: Kephart, Richard Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:24 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Garriott, Kevin Cc: Clayton, Gina; Fierce, Lisa Subject: Outback Steakhouse Flood proofing I recently spoke to a Mr. Peter Fener (404-365-7600) who is working with the Outback group for the restaurant on Mandalay Ave. He wanted to know about flood proofing requirements for the building. He said that the building is certified as flood proofed for 11 feet. I informed him that he would need to provide the certification to the city building official and planning department for the review. I also informed him that any exterior building additions/remodeling would also need to be certified as flood proofed to the same height of existing building flood proofing level. If you have any questions please contact me. Richard Kephart Senior Planner City of Clearwater i Northpinellas: Outback revi*ope for beach complex Page 1 of 3 t. ete b TIM 0 a N LI N E NORTH PI EU ? TA_m?ABA Calendars FIND A Cllr FINGAMOME FIND A JOB sptimes.com Text-only News sections Action Arts & Entertainment AP The Wire Business Citrus County Columnists Floridian Hernando County Hillsborough Letters Neighborhood Times News Update North Pinellas North of Tampa Obituaries Opinion Pasco County 1 t1do to easier wedding planning... Classified Forums Sports Weather Watch History Unfold Subscribe to The 5t. Petersburg Times _ i E mail this story Print this story Outback revives hope for beach complex The restaurant chain and an arcade will open shop in the Pelican Walk shopping center, which has not been faring well since it opened eight years ago. By JENNIFER FARRELL, Times Staff Writer C St. Petersburg Times published August 2, 2002 CLEARWATER -- Twin deals signed this month are poised to bring an Outback Steakhouse and high-tech video arcade to the struggling Pelican Walk shopping center on Clearwater Beach. South Pinellas On Monday, Outback inked an agreement with Pelican Sports Walk owner Louis Anastasopoulos to add a 225-seat State restaurant to the north side ground floor of the two- Tampa Bay story shopping center on Mandalay Avenue. TV Times World & Nation Earlier this month, Anastasopoulos finalized a lease on Find your local the opposite end of the building for a 4,000-square- news section foot game room with virtual reality and standard Weekly sections arcade games Homes . Outdoors Perspective "I think it will be just a great," said Valerie Gilgore, Taste owner of Beach Gameland, which is expected to open Tech Times in mid September. "It's a perfect mixture." Travel Weekend City officials hope the additions will breathe new life Xpress into the 8-year-old building at 483 Mandalay Ave. that Other features so far has failed to meet business expectations. They tampabay,com said Outback is a known quantity -- a "destination Area guide restaurant" -- that will draw patrons and, in turn, other Calendar businesses to the beach. Yellow Pages Special Links Mary Jo Melone Howard Troxler stay ahead of the storm Tampa Bay Cars Tampa Bay Homes Tampa Bay Jobs Classifieds - All listings Don't missl • Health Careers • Career Quest • Coupon Book • Hurricane Guide • Lottery • Physician Health Care Resource • Spree- Shopping Guide • Summer Camps • Travel Specials • Weddings • Yellow Pages Y ?H n I? > % tlri tJlrl ;: t4fr From the Times North Pinellas desks • Outback revives hope for beach complex • Mechanical garbage collection file://C:\Documents%20and%20 Settings\wwells\Local%20Settings\Temporary%20Intemet°r... 8/2/2002 Northpinellas: Outback revi*ope for beach complex Comics & Games "It's going to attract a lot of people there," Mayor Find it! Brian Aungst said. "I think that's going to have a very Forums positive spinoff." Movies Real estate Outback representative Jim Pollard said the 6,500- Residents square-foot restaurant is expected to open early next Travel year with roughly 100 employees, following some reservations construction work on the building. Times Visitors Weather "I'm knocking on wood," he said. "We've got a long Worship directory way to go. We're trying to do it as quickly as we can." Ybor City Yellow Pages Gilgore, who has visited Clearwater Beach for 15 Special Sections years, plans to move here from New York to run the Arena FB(Storm) new arcade. She said she is ready to leave the "stuffy Buccaneers corporate environment" of the technology industry. College football Devil Rays "I decided to follow a dream that I came up with years Lightning ago," she said. "What I really like is being in an Neighborhood environment where people are having fun.... I've Times always said that this is something the area needs." North of Tampa Ongoing stories Two features Gilgore plans for the family arcade are Police report Schools interactive games simulating dance contests and all- Seniority terrain vehicle races. Special reports Stocks Up to four players will be able to race each other on Services machines networked together. • Advertise Online "Dance, Dance Revolution," Gilgore said, has a huge • Auto following in Japan, where crowds line up to watch • Classifieds players dance along with a familiar song, keeping up • Employment with moves projected on a screen. • Market Info • Newspapers in a computerized voice shouts All the while Education , encouragement, such as: "You're too cool. You're my • Personals dancing hero." • Subscribe • Contact us Anastasopoulos said he expects to reach a deal this All Departments week that will bring an ice cream parlor to the last vacant space on the first floor. City officials said ongoing streetscape improvements on Mandalay are key to drawing more people and businesses to the beach. Commissioner Hoyt Hamilton, whose family owns the Palm Pavilion Beachside Grill & Bar on Clearwater Beach, praised the new additions and brushed off any Page 2 of 3 endorsed • 2 deputies suspended over ugly arrest e Attorney general's office sues Dance Place • Opera students to learn from masters • Junior program as good as Gold, Countryside says • Emerging artist reveals emerging Florida Letters e Commissioner Harper: new library a must-have file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\wwells\Local%20Settings\Temporary%20Internet°r... 8/2/2002 ' Northpinellas: Outback revi*ope for beach complex e Page 3 of 3 fears of increased competition. "It can't do anything but be a positive," he said. "There's enough business for everybody." -- Jennifer Farrell can be reached at 445-4160 or farrell@sptimes.com. f[?f E-mail r?l Print .:ter - r this atory this story Watch History Unfold Subscribe to The St. Petersburg Tirnes 3, . Click for 10031 elty guide Past 14 Days G6 Back to North Pinellas news © Copyright St. Petersburg Times. All rights reserved. file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\wwells\Local%20 Settings\Temporary%20Internet°r... 8/2/2002 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: ? 13 z87- X1195 Phone: b 13- 2.'62- - 1 ZZ.S FROM: w P-M Phone:. TZ7 - S b Z- 4J DATE•_ 1 % to ? 'D Z RE• + $ 3 f A.,.? da. /' Jve . ..sr. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) A .a RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 07/16/2002 14:28 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE DIME 07/16 14:21 FAX N0./NAME 98132829195 DURATION 00:06:29 PAGE(S) 11 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM ®258A 2588 , ;4 1 0 10 B dxe 99 ' 616 ? ,? CITY OF CLEARWATER ' °+?if, AND VICINITY - - - - - - • Y,c, o.N. xxm-,13 `JIs i' PU4ELLA3 COUNTY, FLORIDA a 'a PREPARED BY CLE ae YA HT HAS a PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING S? mr B9 AC ESUB 9 ' tae 5. MJ)562-JysUe Ave.. Oe9rwoter, FL 73>% Q Ph.: (81 7gp. Fa a: (813)526-4755 "?MJ _ ?1 a w ? hllp://wrw.Uearrata-0.cam/CIly?leparlm¢nls/public rorMi/mglneer/ Y ® I'° L do 25 35 Di,plalma,: AYMONT m $ Pub llc Inlormouon data Is f-fished by the City or Clea,wate, Pubpc Worka Adminl,trollon/Engineering. -d vat be accepted and us d by the recipient with the under,landinq that the data --7 30 pyn, , ap a?? a ad nm m w ,ecalved was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic Jea py 1 Q I CDRAL. In lraalru<lura Inventory. As such. the City of Clearwater PWA/E sr w u 18D J Y IBd 190 s x q x 0 a ' 99 MOTEL CONDO mantes no warren lie,, ewressed or Implied, concerning the accuracy, aamplelmeas. retlabillty. ar suitab0lly o, this data for n l th ti F th Ci f C th Y k ,x Jl c I 3 W u, F 3 IBS 3 I W U JBI . W 42-114 y a e, par ar use. ermore, cu ur e ty o learwater assume9 no IlaWily whatsoever associated with the use r i f h d t P " I 22?01i I a R? J Jn ' 81 I>a h J I SUN m :u,e o . ouc a a. N f ? y s I Q sJBO HARBOR This Atlas page I, aub e ct to Periodic changes. _ I a 61 r CONDO 'Sno z 0e a nd>a ,? 76-90 For Inlprmallan about lale5l revlsims please call PYIA/E or visit our Web wile. a' S I a SAN RC0 ?mx ST. S e J>d a J>e 11? I : s _ I>I > h Ja , 166 69 8 6 N 1I ?.. 6 I g ' IaJ 3? la. +B1 IBs s Ia - MAND Y a `aos' p Iao ad , I BEACH .ad 23 CLUB , Id v _a2 xIBY 11 _ JDI 60 0 loo 200 400 600 - Is ; 16Y I' e ? 3 122-13 jr '. C4_ n SCALE: 1" = 400' ?I'd 1 R PAPAYA A :a91_Sa 92 IJ, ' LEGEND: 1D a lJl , IJ2 2lda 113 > Fn 11 +x t9 Inver J 111 , S (\,? y 1 O BLOCK NUMBER /-? J<e J Its IV Grp ' I. Iz Im J 1234 LOT ADDRESS , Izz ? < -CITY LIMITS LINE ,rr ? I o +oe r Falk z xa 'z" ' m> ., Sr IY3A e " rSHADED AREA - PROPERTY a4 9 3 of ' >. Ioe 8 a ' ?'??"? OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS v o I n \ 101 t9 13 ,p Na N IBB i0 I S ° '0 R A 23/01 lea • T,q yp ? » _ ?Yl a ,, n Joa Jaa d9r "loo Joa lx H ,x AG EEMENT TO ANNEX Q CITY OWNED PROPERTY e9 x, IaI W ? I 86 MDR ZONING DESIGNATION r io as ,,,°°ao +or „EU ears-623 92 __--$ ZONE LINE m J ® K ?? I99 so9.- 799-30? I` B a O , / \ - ___ ?_-. _ _ ___ o i'' / '• " 5 ' 10 I - I WA,ER T2 p ?l}.la 1 g -_• GeV fe S. i S.R. 5o I- 49 j V teye n n. ? _ _ ___ Z ? eD ' ' 0 ' ? q9?? v2,1-1152 $ 6 CAUSPWAY ?'? Rm ' y yyy? ` I r 13 ` 12 `I I t H E O - o P E N T T 10 C I f Y ^ ' n ? C -U.E boo 3 S I Q Q Q 4 m q © a9t2 It/IJ/01 J ?? C t I WATER LOT 1 C U MBIA n? I a.e.'32,_ -_ , S B. 23-60 ro9,_,o-a pia-le>s 102 Channel t028-92 REVISED: B GUL NEW BLVD >Q+ , 1213/01 G0" 1013 1 > r - - ZONING ATLAS 0 /01 72/03 YA 32 2 NW 1/4 OF SECTION ® 276A ?F)7 2768 ® 8 - 29 S - 15 E U '5 (/1 L-A W CITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 4, 2002 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 483 MANDALAY AVENUE (FLS2002-08063) To Surrounding Property Owners: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Clearwater Planning Department has received an application for Flexible Standard Development from Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. represented by Mr. Jamie Butler for the property at 483 Mandalay Avenue. You are being sent this letter because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the site. The request is to permit a restaurant within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.0 and the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes a 6,300 square-foot restaurant with an outdoor cafe located within an existing 38,000 square foot shopping center. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this case. You may participate by calling me to discuss the case, visit our office to review the application and/or send written comments to be considered in the City's review of the project. The earliest possible date that the City will make a decision on the project is September 19, 2002. Therefore, please contact me or send your written comments no later than that date. On September 12, 2002, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review the project for compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review, the Planning Director will make a decision to either approve or deny the application. As a nearby property owner, you will receive a copy of the Development Order that describes the Planning Director's decision on the project. Should you be dissatisfied with the City's decision, you have the right to appeal the decision to the Community Development Board. Please be aware that the appeal must be filed with the City within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 should you have any questions. ?Sincerely, AICP Senior Planner IIMS5clPDSIPIanning DepartmentlCD BlStandard FlexlPending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRCIMandalay 483 Outback SteakhouselMandalay 483 Notification Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOPI' HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CV0 MANDALAY INVESTMENTS 2201 4TH ST N STE 20C) ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 4300 HUNTER HOTEL CO PO BOX 7230 DES MOINES 50309 7230 DERVECH, ALEXANDER t"i?r'i l0AL,0,Y TR UST 1907 ORO CT CLEARWATER FL, 3764 664 HEILMAN3 RESTAURANTS 447 t''r=4T"!DALA Y AVE CLEARWATER Fl- 33767 20.13 .:J E (--. FUNDING 1N0 C/O JACK ECK.ERD CORP TAX DEPT PO BOW 46S9 CLE ARWATE::R FL 60 f to q681) PRESTON, MICHAEL G 419 F SHORE [JET' CLEARWATER FL 33767 2028 • FLORIDA CLEARWATER BEACH HOTEL CO PO BOX 7230 DES MOINES IA 50309 7230 MARY G REALTY INC C:L..E ARWATE::R FL 33767 2007 THE r..:7ERVECH, MARY DERVECH, ALEXANDER 1907 C1RO CT CLEARWATER FL 3764 6645 IN C CLEFIRWATEF. 1' C:IF PO QV?V748 -E1RWATER FL 33758 4748 FSRANDE NBUR(i H , BRANDENSURGH, 37 EiA4'MC'iNT T CLEARWATER FL 33767 1704 JOHN Ei TF,.E: JOAN THE TRE_ B J E IN(.. CLEARWATER FL. 33767 C/O JAC'.K. EC:K -s. 5 CORIP TAX DEPT L.,. E- A R l+ A T E R FL, 6614d 468V 447 P°iH-iE''•tDALAY ti CLEARWAl' FL. 33 i 01' YEAROUT, JANE YEAROUT, JAMES 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER E`CH FL 33767 1334 CLEARWATER, PO BOX &Q-10- E 7 ... ? 4 4 4J `r'EAROUT, JANE R 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL_ 3767 1.334 PRESTON, MIC LOEK6" TIRE 41 F:" (J R _g0V*RWATFR FL 33767 2028 lJ • DAY, WILLIAM A TRE I ?RAC UT Mt*) 01826 3210 PO BOX 3191 HOLIDAY FL 34690 0191. POTTER, PASCHOALENA 463 EAST SHORE DR CL_i AReraA TER FL, 33767 2033 D E:: I..., E: T I O U L., U ,, I `'i>M E:~. T 2581 1/2 N CLARK CHICAGO IL 60614 1717 RAO, C)fJP'•dNA L 14+70 CE°IL,I;•, AR RIDGE. Fl- 34683 6456 • STEPHANS, SUSAN 701 TAYLOR T #1 508 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94108 3825 UPI,NO„ MARIE V TRE:" 466 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL. 33767 2031 UTA 3-30-82 1850 SAN MATEO DR DUNEDIN FL. 34698 3719 FORL..INI, DOhiE:NICO G FORLINI, FULVIA CLEARWATER F).-, 33767 132/1 POTTER, PA`iC:HOAL._IPadA C PO BOX 2535 SALISBURY MD ?21802 2535 LUTZ FL 35549 5858 JONES, THOMAS f-') 14 ARLINGTON ST 28801 2006 KSIAZEK, STANLEY 483 E SHORE OR 4 A-6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 2033 DAY, WILLIAM (! R E+ 1968 E..AKE . nl r?VEr° 3 it .126 SOLARI, HUGH SOLARI, ANN 41 MADELINE ST BRIGHTON MA 02135 2145 409 CL+^,RA DR BRANDON FL 33510 3727 PHILLIPS, HAROLD PHILLIPS, MARGARET 2459 TjaiINBROOKF RD HICKORY NC 28602 8721 SICII_..IAr'dO, i°iARIO ICILIANCi.u.r3AE BOB , SYLV IA 28316 DOL.L.YE3F=CiOK L N LUT1 Ft- 9 58'8 QD SICIE..,IANO,, MARIO URUDZIE:N, .`::3I.,_AWOMIE IC.ILIANO, COE••d;UELO URUD Ir N, TERE `wA 18316 DC7LL..`r`RROOK L'N 671; WEST IMLAY LUTZ Fl.- CHICAGO IL. 335 49 5858 60631 L 1 rIFyi'., I"'Eof OL..1. DENNIS CE, ARt:iNE:,, JACK Iv. 19505 QUESADA AVE N 4 1..:'71 C::1::SARONC:., j'IAfM:Y PT CHARLOTTE FL, 703 CONCORD L?,J, 33948 3114 LOMBARD IL 60148 3718 IC:::iL...IANO, MARIO.,- HORNUNG„ NELSON •`.:'iICIL...IANO-°Sq /A, SIL.,VIt HOEn'NlJNG, PEGGY L_ l,! l': r , C;: L._ E s^, F?'!tJ "1"r- .E E` I._ Life' 5858 3759 :934 MITCHELL, SALLY 1-' FCS:ANEK,, ROSE M 4 SMITH ST PO BOX 418''.7 CHELMSFORD M() CLEARWATER Fl- 33758 4187 FOX, RALPH I... 111, B(%I...!L... AN , JOHN L'-.l FOX, 7C:iAN A RANNAN, SUSAN 39 PINE RIDGE RD 5674 WENDY CIR BUZZARDS BAY MA LOCKPORT NY 02532 2118 14094 601-5 MC: L_AUGHI_.IN, ANN 'r':. THE H AL.Y,,. PATRICK J 72 MAPLETON ST HEALY, MARY BRIGHTON MA 19 DUNCKLEE S'T 02135 2822 BRIGHTON MA 02135 2116 HE::AL_'Y', f-A SOI_ENZIO, STEPHEN M HE )L_ Y , aF'1' 131 CC7MMu'RC I AL.. PKWY 4 3A 119 D. CEt.LEF-. ST BR •zNIw ORn CT &-GHTON MA 06405 2539 02135 2116, CCHAREwTT"E, RALPH .1 CORAL MOTEL CONDO ASSN INC CHARE°TTE, LOOS J C/O MC: MUL_,L_EN PO BOX-186 PO BOX 1669 C;17C°NA FL... C:L_Er=,E WATE R E=L 34660 OIS6 33757 1669 MC 3WE~.Eitsf Y, JOHN J CICILIANO, MrtRIO MC Ca l7 EENE 'f , KATHLEEN K E ir";ESE:;OZA , Va f EL.IO E 309 BAHAMA DR APT C: 18316 DOLL.YE3RClOK L.,N NORWOOD MA LUTZ Ft- 0r 662 3i"'i30 33549 5858 5L1N HARBOR CONDO ASSN INC:: JOHNSON, WILLIAM L 479 F SHORE- DR APT" 6 479 EAST" SHORE DR 4 .1. CLC;AE?!r ATER FL- CL..EM"t-,RWATER FL_ 33767 2039 33767 203'') L_AirJSON, PETER 3 C)F:.`.aAUL..NIE f;2S, DAVID 479 EAST SHORE DR R 2 905 DELAWARE ST CLE F'fE2WAT"ER FI_.. SAFETY HAt-,BOR FL.. 33767 2039 34695 3840 ! 436 COUNTRY C;L_[,.IB RD 43°1 9 FAST SHORE DR tF ". Gf1.1:1F--clu1.S, 3 A I D P,d F°UL...TON HOMES INC': GLJ1C4GUI , tilt,4 RVA ,J ICJ G1C:'.CiON DR LJt',!1T .13 2 7 5 0 2 9,11.1, 2 C.'Fi1AVF-,0'T1 1)f=VEL0Pt°iEP.T 1N c 77 2 5 F31RC t•iti01JNT R0 4 3 UNIONVILLE ON L..3R 9X3 CANADA 1 t t 9 -2 144 .,_ - _/ /- -,- ~I~S aaoa~o~o~3 : . z` ` .a w w - ~ l .Q , w i % - - ~ GRAPHIC SCALE _ ; , : .Q I I ~ f I t, ,o ~ ~ = ~ o ~ w ~ ~ J V d ~ (air) ~ ~ =a ' UCT 10 X002 1 inch = 20 tl a i a a.~ i , ~ f'~ 6,46 Q o ~'~.i r t~~ ~~:,'a t! °d'fa ~ ~'ti NA~i~tJU 22 r^' i i ~ 7 i ~ (`:i ~ 1OP 4f TfANK,,,,, `ti 74 ~,I r ,,,t o J ~ w.+'~ CONTROL ' sTrucT4R~ n SEE DETAIL FOR RESERVED PARKING SK;NAGE r: r:. ~ '5021 ~ 4 to~.Of ° DETENTION POND EXISTING UTILITY LEGEND ANO ~~"GSAnTI°oN v ~ ~ N82 C t~ i . ...c » .."M" " 1~ ~ z w` sT-5 - z o br, t~ 12 . M.E.5. M.E.S. M.E.S. INY.~Z.95 INV.»2.94 INV.»0.08 f STORM STRUCTURE & PIPE ~ a r a MY l I ~ - ,Y v o ~ ~ ~ LIGHT POLE ~ v~`~ ~ ~ ~ w MAS ARY PVC WATER MAIN 1 » w 12 ( DUM TER _ FIRST FLOOR ~ sP cES a spAr s SS 1 ~E ~ 'I I ENCL SURE " -~E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ~j,, ~ ~ ~ 01 J J o = E' a ~ i SANITARY MANHOLE RIM 6.89 DU1,B,ACK STEAKHOUS N ~~w OVERHEAD 1MRE oErAIL ~ N ~ ° m w ~ o BOTTOM OF BOX=1.19 ~ EXIST. G.F.A. = 4,843 ~ ~ PROPOSED G.F.A. = 6,542 ~ ~ o ~ SS-2 "'~Iv uc UNDERGROUND GAS LINE 2"~~ a' sP~EC~~TIa ~ 4 0 ~ ~ ~ w ~ SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.98 1 ~ 4 OTTOM OF BOX=1.28 - - _ _ . / ~ ~ B I ~ ~ 1/' ~ I- o Ct: \ $Q- - - ~ FIRE HYDRANT & VALVE t • 0D w ~ w ~ c / ST-4 SS-3 ~ $T-8 \ ~ oEI,_aio ELEVATOR dt STAIRS SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.01 R MAIN / REMOVE IST. „ TO E \'~?--N---SANITARY LINE & MANHOLE ~ z ~ ~ ~ N 6 CLAY (N)=-0.24 / ~ SAT H.C. MA LNG o ~o w ~ 0 n ~AT~O / 70 i3~b`71LC~c~S~D RELOCA EXIST, SIGNS 6 CLAY (S)=-0.08 I ( °----~I SANITARY SERVICE & CLEANOUT v w 1 Y Z - T » / / / 2 4 CLAY (NW)=1.65 1 ~ p _ _ _ ----w-----WATER LINE w z o / ESN /r//f ~ I o SS-4 .I 3 O wU SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.23 / / Z A~P ~ I I N ~ . ~ 1 I ~ r7 ; ~ I WATER SERVICE & VALVE ' wy~~ - - - ~ t. EACH !xICFI PARKING SPACE SHALL BE CONSPICUOUSLY BOTTOM OF BOX=0.23 / ~ //f 1 / I I OUIUNEO IN BLUE PAINT, AND SHALL BE POS>IED AND MNNTAOVED WTTH A PERMANENT, ABOVE GRADE SK~1 BEARING THE INTERNATIONAL 4'-0' d~^ ~ NEW PAR NG ~ SS-5 / / f / I STRIPE ( ICAL) - SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY, OR THE CAPTIONi"PARKING BY DISABLED SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.33 P I PERMR ONLY." OR BEARING BOTH SUCH SYMBOL AND CAPTION. SUCH SIGNS SHALL. NOT BE OBSCURED B!f A VEHICLE BOTTOM OF BOX=0.38 ~~~f` / ~ f " tiro 110 11.1 PARKED IN THE SPACE. ALL HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES MUST BE SIGNED AND MARKED IN ACCORDANC& WITH THE STANDARDS ADOPTED f ~ / / I PEDESTRI 'U ACCESS 12" ~ ~ . I a 8Y THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. / / Z 2. FL DOT RECOMMENDS MEASURING PARKING SPACE WIDTH FROM CENTER PROPOSED I / / / BREEZEWAY - w TO CQTIER BETWEEN BLUE AND ,rRiITE STRIPES. , r Q NEW WALL oSCAPE ~ ` ~~~I`a' ~ HANDICAP PARKING & SIDEWALK ''f / ; CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) ~ isLANO(TVP.) Q o ~ 1 i I ~ N15 It 0:~ Z Y in Qy o ~ / M a ~ t~ "~n ST-1 3 ; ~1r~.rc~ I- ~ Z a . ~ O ~ I`~=F?o-n tTfe ~ Z OZpF-JO~OJ _ w ~ / / ~ " ~ GRATE INLET-5.57 o I I ~ u n = ~ t I ~ = ne m R MnE aar. rNrt W ~ W W _ Z LL TOTAL GROUND FLOOR: ~ ~ Z a W o o~~ Q o INV 12 X18 ERCP(N) 3.67 W ? / / , N G U -•v- 0 z / I EXIST. F.A.R. = 0.25 ti ~ ~ Rs~~Llur AID o+ HEK;ltT. LETTERS ARE Tn eE sERES v ~ o ~ to m w N N Z ~ I d ~ {i ST 2 ~ NEW H.C. I ~I PROPOSED F.A.R. = 0.26 z TOP PDRnoN aF SIGN SHALL NAVE REFIECTORREO (ENaNEERtNO GRADE) BLUE ~ w o a w Z o'o o Z GRATE INLET=5.54 N.I ~ PARKING STRIPING ~ n n I INV 12 X18 ERCP S =3.36 ~ E I » tM BACKGROUND TIITH WHTR; REFI.ECTORIlEO LEGEND AND 80RDER. p W = Q F' ~ = Q PARKING: FArnaNC ~ , BOTTOM PORTION aF Slpl SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENf;INEERINO GRADE) O dS W O ~ J F G' ~ J n n X N I 1~ INV 12 X18 ERCP(N)=3.27 Q w %l DISABIED PERMIT ONLY WHITE BACKGROUND KITH BLACIt BORDER. = N ~ O 0: Q ~ n I~ ~ / / i ~ ~ 0 12" INV 8 RCP{W)=3.34 ? FIRST FLOOR 13 ExISTING=101 (INC. 4 H.C.) Be aTNED #s 250.00 4 ONE SIGN REWIRED FOR EACH PARKMO SPACE. N W W W W p N ~ W O SHOPS z I PROPOSED=104 INC. 4 H.C.) s HEK~T aF s,~t sNAU BE IN ACOORDANCE wml sEGTIaN y~_~y ~ THE MANUAL W o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ u ST-3 I w _ " / / r EXIST. G.F.A. = 10,158 ~ ~ I " ON UNIFORMED 1RAFFlC CONTROL DEMCES (MUTCD~ a' W 0: 0: ~ Y 1- Y =OF-W~VZO:~ GRATE INLET-5.61 ~v = 9 n n Q PROPOSED G.F.A. 8,953 INV 12 X18 RCP N =3.42 / / % ~ a I ~ v~ ~ t-aNUZw?~t3w 0 //r' ~ t HANDICAP PARKING SIGNAGE m Z ~ I ~ I• "1 ST-4 a~ „ I NTS GRATE"INLET-5.47 - ~ INV 12 X18 ERCP N -3.08 ~ ~ I_ sT-.z W a //f I 1 INV 12"X18" ERCP(S)=3.07 r, ~ ~ o _ ST-5 ~ " I ~ sr a " GRATE"INLET 5.42 ? a I ~ ~ 1 c~ INV 12 X18 ERCP S =3.30 / _ ~ 2 0 O I I , z INV 12"X18" ERCP NE =3.27 a I I ( ) ~ / I n G7 = N , O, INV 8 RCP W =3.23 ~ ~ I ti ~ ~ / c~ ~ ~ i ~ Z~ 0 ST-6 ~ o o I ( w ~ » - / t ~ ~ ~ p t 2 STORM MANHOLE-4.88 ~ ~ ~ N I n - o ( INV 24 RCP(W)-0.10 / o 0 1' I a a a n ~ _ a a r INV 24 RCP(E)=-0.17 0 ~ l SS-5 ~ ~ W W CONC. ~ f V f 11" I V PLANTER TYP. ~ ~ V SS 4 0 `IJG UGEXI~TING GREASE TRAP ~ ~ ) 2'R'~• CONC. ~ I z o ? / ~ o ~LtIYNLT'M1'~) ~ w 9• U U r - & ~.INE TO BE REMOVE / N - - ~ N ~ I ~ ~ X -p"` a 4 a X W ~ ~jJ VIEW 15U~GACCON s W ~ 3, ~ ~ t SS- ~ ~ - _ CREASE TRAPS (2) $_„"S ASSOC. PLUM z ~ / Q M ~ ~ TREE ~ ~ • p PROPOSED 10' X 15' - ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ _ LEGEND o ~ " / / REMOVE EXIST. ~ 0 SCREENED EQUIPMENT ~F I - a - ~ ~ Q » ~ H.C. MARKING » 10 ? PP?Ai~e 6 / / RELOCATE EXIST. SIGN • 12 _ _ _ AREA - BF ~ • OAK ( ) I 13 ~ z » rf ~ / } a 6"pVC.~ y 8 PALM ~ <:r' ~ 1 G YI I ;GREASE LI O V ~ I a " ~ I io ~ i _ " zQ Nil = Wu. MISCELLANEOUS ~ /I a O I~ a 13 E ~ I > I Z ~ m . E EXISTING I a t a a I DCV BACKFLOW ~ ~ ~',I~ 4, I a /1 r ~ I W I PREVENTOR a W W Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I W N a s r FIRST FLOOR sT-, 12 SHOPS 11 I~ ~ I I SERVICEW&T1 R /2" PRIVA ~ ~ ~ ~ V a 11" EXIST. G.F.A. 3,688. 3 ( l I `SUB-METER ~ ~ V ~ PROPOSED G.F.A. = 3,688 I I ~ I a a W NEW H.C. I s ~ f, I m W~ PARKING STRIPING - \ p i - \ i in I~ atl J sT- ~ v W -------w-----w-----w-----w----- o S • 8" PVC WATER MAIN ~ ~ .v O 108.20 o 15" c ~g ~ I I o. •0'21W o , S82 5 MASONARY ELEVAT( / ~ ( i G DUMPSTER II ~ NCLOSURE E n 3 " ~ 2 s 12 x ~~c ~ , ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ DESIGNED BY: ss-, 3 s~ cis s / / / / ~ ~ I I I EMK 1 / f I I ~ DRAWN BY: M ss 2 3 ~a i a.3 O s C~ a 3 3 I ~ I 3 DLY ~ cam'' C: ~ 12' 13 20» r ~ C~ ~ I I I CHECKED BY: p 1$" ' n 14 118.26 A 11 Z 13 13" I ;,P k oHw_58 _ l , ''t i ~ CONNECT TO EXIST. ~ ~ ~ I I ' SCALE: DATE: _ ~ I I SANITARY SERVICE ~ I S SHOW 10/02 T 9 X002 ~ , . ` n .,n-t 7 Q rf102 a ~ rf?02 c~IA~RW BFILDING - ~ ~---I-I I CAD FILE: j UL 1 u L ~ T SITEI LLI~fiSVkrllC6 _ G t-jl 1m- JOB NUMBER: t-.(3w. X11 30573.51 SHEET SCALE: 1 "=10' of 1 nf%T i ~ EAST LEGEND av ¦ FOUND CONC. MONUMENT D4 GAS VALVE F.C.M. FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT- BLDG. BUILDING U) c O N ~ ~ ~ SET ¢ONC. MONUMENT m GAS METER AS NOTED F.F. FINISHED FLOOR U ~ TREE o 0 FOUND CORNER-AS NOTED S.C.M. SET CONCRETE MONUMENT- S/W SIDEWALK z Z ~ GAS METER-MULTI L6~4636 D W DRIVEWAY 3 ~ ~ Z 'C • • SET CAPPED IRON ROD f,C.LR, FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD- / 2 ~ ~ o Q o LEGEND o ~ s S SETNP.KP NA1LA& DISCISK ~G GAS UG MARKER AS NOTED " B.O.C. BACK OF CURBMENT Q L ~ ~ O ~ ~ © GA5 FILL CAP S.C.LR, SET CAPPED IRON ROD 5/8 - ~ ~ ~ • FOUND NAIL LB#4636 CONC. CONCRETE ~ ~ a I ~ ~ o OAK U ~ ON PROPANE UG-MARKER C.L.F. CHAIN LINK FENCE r+1 ~ r7 E Z rn 0 FOUND X CUT F.I.R. FOUND IRON ROD-AS NOTED o ~ 6" PALM X X SET SCRIBED X-CUT ~ F.LP. FOUND IRON PIPE-AS NOTED WD.F. WOOD FENCE ~ ~ ~ v ~ Q ~ H.W.F. HOGIMRE FENCE Li ~ - o BENCH MARK PROPANE VALVE F.P.K,&D. FOUND P.K. NAIL & DISC o o ~ ~ J 1a" ~ MISCELLANEOUS S c~ mA AMMONIA UG-MARKER F.NAIL FOUND NAIL-AS NOTED 4- m ~ ~ ~ 3 WOOD TELE POLE C.B. CATCH BASIN W WATER UG-MARKER F.X-CUT FOUND X-CUT C.I. CURB INLET O Z o ~ ~ (n c H STEEL TELE POLE ® WATER WELL (C) CALCULATED MEASUREMENT G,I. GRATE INLET ~ a ~ o wv (D) DEED MEASUREMENT D.B.,I, DITCH BOTTOM INLET ~ ~ ~ ~ O U CONC. TELE POLE ~Q WATER VALVE (f) FIELD MEASUREMENT Y.D. YARD DRAIN z ~ ~ w W Y N ~ 6' CLF p WATER METER (P) PLAT MEASUREMENT M.E.S. MITERED END SECTION Q ~ w 226.46 _ - ~ WOOD POWER POLE F.E.S. FLARED END SECTION O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK I•- ~ p r" ~ ~ BANK ' STEEL POWER POLE ~ FIRE HYDRANT P.B. PLAT BOOK R.C.P. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE J o TOP OF CONTROL 6" 'r STRUCTURE SPRINKLER D.B. DEED BOOK C.M,P, CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ~ ' ~ CONC. POWER POLE PG. PAGE P.V.C. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE ~ n C P p ST-6 wv 21 E ~ G SLOPE 8 ®V SPRINKLER CONTROL VALVE D.LP, DUCTILE IRON PIPE z ~ ~ P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT WOOD COMBO POLE S SANITARY SEWER ~ ~ , i W = N82 50 ,f f` u ss-5 ~ T~ opE,.. - - D4 , / _,IoE~ ® WATER VAULT P.0.8. POINT OF BEGINNING ss-a 12» 12 t 2„ LOT 2 Iv,aaB ~ ' f,'' ^,r''; rCO ` IV,29 IV.294 STEEL COMBO POLE ®M WATER MONITOR WELL P.O.T, POINT OF TERMINATION FM SANITARY FORCE MAIN I Z C? ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION W WATER LINE Y i ~ f l !1 - cONa SSA , ~ "f' v r » i CONC. COMBO POLE ~ Q(a.> WOOD SIGNAL SUPPORT POLE EPC COMMISSION F WATER FIRE LINE ~ Z a vauLT- - _~~9NK - - - SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.89 r,/' ~ o WOOD LIGHT POLE SS F.D.O.T. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF IRR IRRIGATION LINE W ~ w O ~ STEEL SIGNAL SUPPORT POLE TRANSPORTATION GAS GAS LINE BOTTOM OF BOX=1.19 r' - ~ LOT 43 rf" ~ ^ wv ~ ~cdNC. 2^ 12 STEEL LIGHT POLE ~ S.W.F.W.M.D.SOUTHWEST WATER MANAGEMENT TRANS. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ~ D 40UMSTER o .1 ~j(~JE ~ ~i PAD 8' CONC. 6 5P CES 3 SPA S I>rt( CONC. LIGHT POLE W CONC. SIGNAL SUPPORT POLE DISTRICT OHW OVERHEAD 1MRE - s^""~ ~ BLOCK WALL X N 2 ~ a E. ~ ~ ,N CROSS LIGHT SUPPORT A.C.O.E. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE YARD LIGHT POLE sv L,B. LICENSED BUSINESS SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.98 ~ _ 100.6 ( TWO STORY D I I ~ ~U., GUY ANCHOR POLE ~Q SAN. AIR RELEASE VALVE P.L.S. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR UGT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE BOTTOM OF BOX=1.28 ~ SNCCU BUILDING I ~ y F.F.-s.5o } ~ _ fi P.S.M. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER T,O.B, TOP OF BANK fi GUY ANCHOR oCO SAN. CLEANOUT R/W RIGHT OF WAY T.O.S. TOE OF SLOPE m ~r rr . m ~ ' f- ~ ~ ~ _ ® PHONE VAULT SQ SAN. MANHOLE S/L SECTION LINE E.W. EDGE OF WATER ' f./ LOT - ~ - ~ 4 QT PHONE MANHOLE QD STORM MANHOLE B/L BASE LINE TYP TYPICAL SANITARY MANHOLE RIM=6.01 _ f'r; , r''r _ _ m D.H.W. DESIGNED HIGH WATER N,T,S. NOT TO SCALE ®P PHONE UG-CABLE ? STORM INLET-GRATE-CENTER ~ 6" CLAY N --0.24 ° '~f' ~ sr-5 sr-4 ®P { _ ~ N.W.L. NORMAL WATER LEVEL x~°,~ SPOT ELEVATION o © CABLE N-UG BOX ?D STORM INLET-DITCH-BOT-CENT. ' ELEV. ELEVATION 6" CLAY S =-0.08 ~ - _ _ ' ; S' P - - ° 4 CLAY NW =1.65 _ _ ''f_; _ _ ~ ®C ®C CABLE N-UG CABLE ?r STORM INLET-YARD-CENTER ' STA. STATION rr,'', r f .',f', - - - r f . 4 ' ' r ' - p 2' ~ EO ELEC MANHOLE 0 STORM MITERED ENO SECTION ~ LT. LEFT I 9 RT. RIGHT ® ELEC METER d STORM FLARED END SECTION SS-4 ~ ~ _ x LOT3 ~ SANITARY MANHOLE RIM 6,23 - - - • ELEC METER-MULTI ®CD UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT 'I~ " -------OT`s ~ °o ®c1~ BOTTOM OF BOX=0.23 ~ L ~ u~ 01 x t~ QE ~ ~ N - - - - r :80.7 ~r wHEEI ©E ELEC UG-CABLE -4- SIGN-SINGLE k`. - - - - - f ~ / f ~ STOP TYP. ELEC RECEPTACLE SIGN-MULTI ~ -SANITARY MANHOLE RIM 6.33 _ _ 1oos5O ~ • BOLLARD HANDICAP PARKING z BOTTOM OF BOX=0.38 - rr~, » - ' ''1 P~ r I 10 W ea ® REFLECTIVE MARKER POST N N8 ~ DENOTES CONCRETE SLAB ~ ~ o O L1 - - - .r 110.11 (P) MAIL BOX a - ~ 3 12'~ - - QT 40 ,4.8' Sri, Z - - - L Q DENOTES OVERHANG COVERED AREA FLAG POLE N _ _ N N - ~ ~ ® DENOTES BUILDING AREA o W - - - ,'4.B ~ N < 15 ST 1 ' , _ - ~ Q GRATE INLET=5.57 - - ~ r'~ P) ~ N m „ » O _ 100.65( ,4.8' ( 11 ISLAND(TYP,) Q INV 12 X18 ERCP(N)=3.67 0 _ ~ o Q h M - - s pT 4 ,f 3 L ST-2 - - 39 ' co - - f' LOT r U) GRATE INLET=5,54 a _ _ / r4s' Z INV 12"X18" ERCP S =3.36 W ?o _ _ i - / - ~ INV 12 X18 ERCP(N)-3.27 N 'f r , '~,r± - ~ o z I " RCP W =3.34 Z - - / r ~ NV 8 f I - ,r..-100.65 (P) r - - r r f I ~ ~E - - f" ~ I " ST-3 - ; _ " GRATE "INLET-5.61 ? _ _ f' OT 38 _ 13" INV 12 X18 RCP(N)=3.42 Q r ' co a - - ; ~ ~ J ° _ _ _ ~ Q - N ST-4 - - f _ GRATE. INLET=5.47 - r' 10o a Z r ~ ~ ~ • INV 12"X18" ERCP(N)=3:08 _ _ ,P _ , ~ I „ „ Q - - - TWO STORY _ n I ao INV 12 X18 ERCP(S)=3.07 c>' _ ' r` STUCCO BUILDING 3 X ~ S - - r ~ _ _ b F.F.=6.50 N 5 ro ~ „ - - 37 ~ LOT x LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a - - - - - ~ LOT ~ ST-2 iv - _ - c ST 5 0 _ Lots 2,3,4, and 1/2 of vacated alley way abutting said Lots to the West, in Block "A" - ~ - - / ~ ~ -a a- GRATE INLET-5.42 N - f' ~ " 11" „ - - - f~,. 19 ST-3 n C per the REPEAT OF BLOCK "A" AND LOTS 1 TO 15 INCL BLOCK,"B" OF CLEARWATER ~ Y Q INV 12 X18 ERCP(S) 3.30 ? - _ f-'~ r/ ~ N „ N (vl L' Q,,,~, ?~G~C.t, BEACH FIRST ADDITION, recorded in Plat Book 21, at Page 21, of the Public Records, w J Q INV 12"X18" ERCP(NE)=3.27 - _ 6g~ , f ~ t2 1p Q^^ » _ 100. ,f . I , INV 8 RCP(W)=3.23 _ - _ _ _ ° - Pinellas County, Florida.(Note: said property formerly being described as Lots 2,3 and , Q - 4 and 1/2 of vacated alley way abutting said lots to the West, Block "B" of the > ~ X ` ~ FIRST ADDITION TO CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, recorded in Plat Book 15 at Page 80.} ~ > O _ _ _ U t ST 6 - - f N ~ P » ~ ~ us' ' 2,~ ~ 5 0 ~ Lots 34 through 43, LESS the Southerly 10 feet of Lot 34, together with 1/2 of ~ z = 4.88 - - - r''f, T 36 8, _ "i^' 110.710 0 12 STORM„MANHOLE LO N vacated alley way abutting sold lots to the East, Block B, FIRST ADDITION TO ~ ~ f INV 24 RCP W =0.10 a - - ' N O » ° n J?~~1~ ~ q' ~ ~ CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 15 at Page 80, Public Records in Q INV 24 RCP(E)=-0.17 - T`/ Y CONC. ~ - - r' and for Pinellas County, Florida; L1J PLANTER(TYPJ N _ - ''4• 1 Q - fr U - I ~ X f. / ? - 100.65 (P) h CO I w ~ ~ TOGETHER WITH O W I- ~ ~ - - - Fr ~ ' ~ w f S ~ ~ 9 O Lot 5, and 1/2 of vacated, alley way abutting said lot to the West, in Block "A" per ~ ~ z the RE-PLAT OF BLOCK "A" AND LOTS 1 TO 15 INCL. BLOCK "B" OF CLEARWATER ~ ~ - - ,~4.B' ° ~ LOT ZZ,~y = ~ ~ 3 ~ BEACH PARK FIRST ADDITION, as recorded in Plat Book 21 at Page 21, Public Records, ~ 0, - - r' LO % „ a ~ - M o _ _ ~i ~ a Pinellas County, Florida,(Note: said property formerly being described as Lot 5, and ~ ~ a ~SZ 1/2 of vacated alley way abutting said lot to the West, Block "B" of the FlRST N ~ r4' M - p ~ 1 O _ v ~ 2'X2" CONC _ - q a ) ~ Z ADDITION TO CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, recorded in Plat Book 15 at Page 80.) U Y (n CIX.UMN(TYP.) C a o _ _ ~ x i q _ 1 Q" Z Q _ r' s Lots 32,33 and the Southerly 10 feet of Lot 34 and 1/2 of vacated alley way ~ U a 7 ~ abuttin said lots to the East Block "B" FIRST ADDITION TO CLEARWATER BEACH - Q PAY ' r'' „ J X ~ 1 - - r ~ 12 PHONE ' Id 13" 9 m l PARK, as per plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 15 at Page 80, Public Records, W Y - - ,r'To , of 1 P) a T I - -1F - - . --z 110,1 ( K ~ ~ 7 ~ Pinellas County, Florida. LJJ F- ' e~~- lots 6,7,8 and 1/2 of vacated alley way abutting said lots to the West, in Block "A" Q., ~ z per the RE-PLAT OF BLOCK "A" AND LOTS 1 TO 15 INCL. BLOCK "B" OF CLEARWATER ~ ~ a- - ~ 13" _ ST,V _ _ _ _ _ - _ ~ ~ 1~ I ~ ~ ~ BEACH PARK FlRST ADDITION, as recorded in Plat Book 21 at Page 21, Public Records, RS 6 p - Pinellas County, Florida.(Note: said property formerly being described as Lots 6,7 and 8 and 1/2 of vacated alley way abutting said lots to the West, Block "B" of the - - r r" 54.5 - ~ x a I ~ x ~ . ~ FIRST ADDITION TO CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, recorded in Plat Book 15 at Page 80.) - - - - - r i f ' - ~ a b _ C, ' N N C 1 I~ a- - = • 10.0 ~ ~ _ ~ LOT ° f pT 33 / - f ~ l~ n J3o N_ 10.0' - - ~3 0 ~ $b ,~t,~ 1 ,,.6' v ~ x 13 Z ,f ,,r , ~ 1 l 7~ ~ 3 ~ Z " 1 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: ' i TWO, STORY 3 ~ $ ~ 7 L„ 1.) This is a Specific Purpose Survey only, made on the ground under the supervisio~~ii-`~f~tr~4=w---~----- ~i~ STUCCO BUILDING ~ x ' _ F.F.=6,48 SS- ~ I Florida Registered Surveyor & Mapper, and exceeds the minimum technical standd~ ~ r. rf ~ ~r3 ~1~ ! (8 ~ p ~ for horizontal accuracy for this property's expected use. ; ~ 1¢ LOT 32 D - M D ~ ~ b ii' l~ ~ DESIG__..._..._...___.......~ d 2.) Bearings are based on the North Boundary of Block "A" of Clearwater Beach II II NED BY: i r'~ w w w w = r , r 0 Z.t~ = First Addition as per Plat or Map thereof, recorded in Plat Book 15, page:. QG~.~ ~ ~Q~~ 1 N/A , r j' r•'~,f'I r f' ~ ~ O r ff.•' 108.2 6 CONC. O 80, the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, as being N 82'50'21" E. , P~ f r` 15" • °a BLOCK WALL fn C ~ J a ,/'rf ~ ~ W O a ~ L ~ ~j ; ~ L7,,j ~ ~'r.Ft~~d~fr ~Fi.iJl.(Jr'~'~1L13' ~ DRAWN BY:~ x'99 (ter CCl"RN'NA1~Ei=15VCy S82'5~ 2 O a 3.) This Specific Purpose Survey was conducted for the purpose of a Location/Utility i MDR. I ~ ~ O ~ Survey only, and is not intended to delineate the regulatory jurisdiction, of any ~ federal, state, regional or local agency, board, commission or other similar entity. CHE~KED BY: ouM TES ~ 12" 12'A ' P SPA S s., 3 K o Z~ Z cD -v- , a 0 s 17 V ~ 4.) This survey was conducted without the benefit of an obstraat of title; therefore, (there may DFP J be other easements, rights-of-way,. setback lines,, agreements, reservations, restrictions, or i SCALE: DATE: I 3 ss t A~5 ,y s sP ~ » © G~ 12 ` ~ other similar matters of public record, riot depicted on this survey. M ss 2 . 13 d 1 , 7i~9 ~ i 1 "=20' 9/6/02 Co " ~ © © » 13 3 5.) No underground utilities, underground ericroachments, building foundations. were observed .PARTY ,CHIEF: as a part of this Survey, unless otherwise shown.. „ ©G~ » 12" 13 6 p» O ~ t4 118,2 O „ 18 11~ AP 6.) The property shown hereon falls within Flood Zone "AE", as shown. on the Flood Insurance i A ~.-------'.""''O oHw--S82 Rate Map, Community Panel Number;125096 0017 B, revised date 6/1/83. ~ FIELD BOOK:- i W o nt. ~ 7.) This survey not valid without the signature and the original raised seal of a Florida licensed Surveyor and Mapper._, CAD FILE: BNDY.DWG i LE 0"OPY ~i F 6 JOB NUMBER: J,r Date Signed: /U X-, 30573.51 I David F. Pedch,-':'$Q SHEET Registered Surveyor brpPer Last Date of Field Survey. 9/6/02 i State of Florida No. 593W e; i Of lI i rs : R'e#l~ ~r a i