Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2006-07045
Planning Department '100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 fJl"^SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGIVI_D AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION LII,?_SL IBNIIT 14 COPIE=S OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are requirr:a to he collated, stapled, and folded into sets [its SUBNtIT F,PPLICA I I(= fd FEr J Ill CASE #: _ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: NOTE: 15 TOTAL SE I'S OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) 'F' f'XIII-LE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 03/28/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PRoPH:R TY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: ? 6 ? ? ? -' -.......l-L ? D ... _ _ ._. ... ........ .... PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deers GG AGENT NAME: ,/ /lp.?`S?c( f.,1??e?lf?l.f??!?.......•tc.l..??1., /'`., _... _._.._.._.... MAILING ADDRESS: .. . ........ t?/ J`1..r?._...._.:.... ..... ..... PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: `"j_`1 111 ...4.0,3&.... .. CELL NUMBER: u 9 G" f E-MAIL ADDRESS: /?1 !.? ._?t-?....?..'_..._lJ?.`-?,,?.._...__...________...._.. r???t{????..?!L.?IJi!?c`.?a?7._e±?,J?G?_?.._e'1? B. PROPOSED DE'Vi l_0F1MENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202,A) PROJECT NAME: ?y \ I _ PROJECT VALUATION: ${ Q bll STREET ADDRESS -- ?} \ - -- -- -- - --- PARCELNUMBER(S): rM, - I. ! ._/.s.._r...lKislJ'!?r-a`_1/.7_ 04 0 .._ ..f?..' .l Sa_.... ...... _............ ..... . PARCEL SIZE (acres): PARCEL SIZE (square feet): / f LEGAL DESCRIPTION: n). art _ il?9 .,'- ...? lI?? ..rte Lv . ?..,r7' /_.. !?r?..1/.gyp , .. _. _ PROPOSED USE(S): S): ..... !/ -- ?'>r??•.r'=tr.°tvr?'?.. c%r?'11?,?1?'', _ rc iJ, .... ?-...?5...?" ?. i??,,c?r?,llcG,?'?'?n? .?,f_. _ ... DESCRIPTION of RE(,)l n-<:; I : ORIGINAL :L r ! ...... ._ RECEIVED Specifically identify the requr,st (include number of units or,, luw-e .... footage of non-residential u.,o and all Noy 0 DO?. requested code deviations; e.g. PLAN reduction in fequired number of ............ ...... ... - NING DEpgR N1ElVi parking spaces, specific use, etc.) CITY p -h d 8 0 d Itz u X:\Clw Applicalions',200"o ApplicationslResidential Infill Project (FLT) 2006.doc Page 1 of 8 s t. DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A P?F_VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ? (if yes, attach a ropy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Corte Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913,A) ? Provide cornplete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed developrnent of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ........ ._ ... .... ...._ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. .... ................. . .......... ................... _............ ................ _............ _.............................. ._... .. ........ ......... ......... .............._.__..................._......_........_....... --......_........... 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. .................. ._........__............. ..... ...._......._._.._.... ...... _.....__......_......._...__.............._........-_......... ....... ......... _. .. ...... .._ ..... .. ......... ................... .... ..................... ......... 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ..r/1-c'!Fc.a......... _........ .... .... ............................. ...._- .. - ......... . .......... . ....... ._....... -, .. - 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ....... ORIGINAL -- - - _--EIV- .— .ED_..._..--- -. . EC RECEIVED— ..._ ..... _. .... .... ._ ....._..... NO 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT X:1CIw A.ppl cations`.2006 Applications\Residenliel In BlI Project (PLD) 2006.doc Page 2 o1*8 • s WRITTEN SUBMITTIU- REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) U Provide complete responses to the sewn (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. ............ ._ .......... .... ... .............. .. . ........ . ......... ... ......... __ .... ...._.... ..... .......... ..__...... _ ........ ............ ... ............... _. . .......... ........... . _. ..... .. ........... 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) .............. .............._._.._._......_...._........ ... ..... _.....././.. ._..__..........._.-.... ........( .. _.!?J_(..d? -iy"J!fe.yL,?r.•.^.._'..?''..._..._._.........._ .............. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ,W 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ........... ...... _'...... ..._..._..__...._ _. . &?& ..: ................... 5. The design of tl e proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. _ I............. r 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ........ ........ .._............ ......... ........_..........._ ........__.............. ._.... ....__.......... _..... .=:._?._.... ...._....... .. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. _...... .__...._......._......_. ._.. -- _....._ _....._..- .._...._......._... _...__.... _ <__._,}e3'ICS/.r .............._. ....._.-_....._ .. _........_._ . _ ... _ ...... ORIGIN _AL .... .. . ................................ ........ -RECEIVED... - NOV 0 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER XAClw Appiicalions\2006 Application s\Residenlial Infill Project (FLO) 2006.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER ELAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual anti 4-202,A.21) vZA STO*' RIVIWA'T1=I: NAI\1RA'rIVC: MUST HE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storrn Drair age Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. U \ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. 0 At a minimum, the STORi\1WATER PLAN shall include tyre following; 0 Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Cl 'roposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets aril n-tunicipal storm systems; CJ Proposed storm water detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to dernonstrate compliance with the City manual. CI Proposer.( stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT- INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT U SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACi(NOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included plan Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION -- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202,A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; U,-' TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, /including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; 01 TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees B" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; C--' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; A PARKING DEMAND STUD`( in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); 01 IA-COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER X9.Ci%v Applications\2006 ApplicalionsMesldential Infill Project (PI_D) 2006.doc la Pe, 4 ol'k G. SITE PLAN SUB vlIT-I-AI_ REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow, Engineering har scale (minimurn scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; II dimensions; .................. F )otprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Fcotprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; A I required sight triangles; _...._ ...... r I entification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including escription and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ................. All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; .............. Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of altsolid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening fper Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ..... ..... .. ..... Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ti SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REWIRED . PROPOSED Land area in square feet arid acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; arking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the lumber of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; .............. Building and structure heights; .............. Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); --- . 5-4 ... .s,12 ....... rFOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ORIGINAL -- RECEIVED All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; NOV 0 9 2006 Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; XAClei Applications`,2006 ApplicalionslResidential Infill Project (FLI]) 2006.doc Page 5 of 8 11. LANDSCAPING ),LAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed StrLIClUres; Names of ahulting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; .._............. Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ............... Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered, ...... ......... Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. EY REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/'s X 11); 21- COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minirnurn Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1_. /BUILDING ELEVATION CLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) CU' BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings: ................. Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/Y X 11. J. SIGNAGEW: (Division 19SIGNS 1 Section t l?X All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc,.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. CI All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ORIGINAL Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Resldential Infill Project (FLT) 2006.doc 1'agc 6 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Suction 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) NOV 09 2006 111 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER • Will degrade the arceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 of rnore new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segmenl and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of rnost hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall he based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Irnpact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. .... .......... .. Traffic Impact Study is not required. Cf ?C?AU` TION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICAN"I' DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. O Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flora CaICUlationsNVatef Study is included. Fire Flow CaICUIationS/Water Study is not required. -'e, r 't ?!??? ??-? CAUTION -- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUf3MITTE• D AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNAT I, the un rsigned, acknowledge that all representations made in 0 '{ of placation are true and accurate to the best of my kn vler ge and authorize City representatives to visit and ph€ tog aph the property described in this application. Si nature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 1_-_ day of A.D. 20_f(-E__ to me and/or by LL, *?? __ ?_il who is personally known has produced -__-- as identification. K)( ary public, My commission expires: J6.14-iDL4 X:',C!w ApphcauonsM06 Appiications\Residenlial Infll Project (FLO) Page 7 of 'S DOREEN A. WILLIAMS i? MY COMMISSION * DD 155802 a?rn° EXPiRFS: October 14.2006 1-B00 &NOTARY FL Notary Service S Bonding. Inc. N1. AFFIDAVIT Y0 li?.1.1'1 I-iORIZ F >< GE: f f": i. Provide r?amc-s c,f aU property owr?ers on deer) - PRINT full names: 2. That (I arnh:rve are) iP e owner(s) and rercrd title I,olrler(s) of the fcliowing described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: r!i` ???i? itt.,°' ?_ ( ^t--..• .__.._. ____.. ss (hisltheir) agerii(s) to execuie any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;. 5. That this affidavit has bLen e ecuted to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property, 6. Thal site visits to the prr;party are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City represrntati ?es t:; visil and photograph the property described in this application; t (I ;,''lie undeisirr d autl orin by ert f; hat the foregoing is trU and correct C i n.p i Qwne roperty Owriar -- ...... opedy Property Owne' _ S'TA'TE OF FLORIDA, C OUNITY OF ,PINELLAS eefor me the under:,Jgned, ari offices duly corrunissionf:d by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ? day of {{ ti ?., '.Y',t _ erscnaily a eared Nho having been first dcdy sraUrn Depi ses and s3y:; that hc!she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/shc signed. 1EEN A. r A pp((yy --c .. /(y il?MJ tr, r??., ?l` .!_(.(•_ ??s,,...,,. V. ?\?_?.?v,fy?,(,;??11,_1'?{V/1..., ........... . . .. ........ o My COMMISSION # DD 155802 ( -'e'r ivO" EXPII'tE6: October 14, 2006 'Signature r"ht?iWjT6f/fitatray Sa vice & Bonding, Inc. My (onunis5ion Expires: tar ?J ........... Public............ ......................... , L......' l -f?L..' ._.,_ _...,. w.?..._._ __ ORIGINAL RECEIVED raOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT X:`,CIw Arjplications?2006 Applications',Comprehansive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.0 tdoc. CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 8 of 8 • t FLEXBIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project Mako Condominiums 240 & 250 Skiff Point DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Demolition of 6 apartment units. Development of 11 attached dwelling units, pool, parking and site improvements. Request for the following reductions: Front Setback: 25' to 0' to trash staging area 25' to 21' pavement 25' to 15.3' to building above Side Setback East: 10' to 5' to walkway 10' to 9' to trash staging area 10' to 5.2' to pavement Side Setback West: 10' to 5' to pavement Rear Setback: 15' to 1' to removable pavers 15' to 0' to pool deck Height: 30' to 46.5' to top of stair tower WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ORIGINAL RECEIVED P-0 0 9 Zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. The proposed development will be in harmony within its location as the surrounding area is currently undergoing a transition from predominately old, run-down duplex/triplex/apartment like units which were building in the late 1960's to a more up-scale residential community similar to this proposal. The density has not been exceeded. Based on the acreage of the site, 11 dwelling units are permissible by code. Although we are requesting reduction to setbacks, they are primarily to pavement. We have maintained consistency with front, rear and side setbacks as well as height with the already approved project at 200 Skiff Point which is two parcels to the north of our site. It is noted that all City of Clearwater's required setbacks are to pavement. The building has a very edgy contemporary feel that has its roots in a Miami Modern vernacular style. Two developments to the west (200 & 201 Skiff Point) have been approved for 49' in height as well as the vacant property to the west of that. Our proposed building will be at 50'. The property directly to the west, built in 1981 is a 2-story building and east of the proposed development was built in 1967 is also a 2-story building. Both of these properties, 212 and 270 Skiff Point have back-out parking and little to no 1 • 1 landscaping. Through development projects such as this Island Estates is once again emerging back into the up-scale community it once was. 2. The proposed development will enhance the street, neighborhood and drastically increase property values rather than impair them. There are only two developments on this street that meet FEMA requirements, four parcels are empty lots awaiting building permits and the remaining parcels are old dilapidated buildings with no site improvements since they were built. 3. No adverse affects will be caused by this development. It will comprise of attached dwelling units which are an allowable use. There will no longer be back-out parking on the street and sight visibility triangles will be met. 4. Traffic congestion will,be minimized. The site currently has one large open curb cut with no definition. Cars are backing out into the right-of-way and the site maintains no sight visibility triangles. The proposed site design has minimized the curb cut to maintain a 24' drive aisle for ingress/egress. 5. The proposed development will be consistent with the community character. Island Estates is a mixed use development with single family homes, retail, restaurants, condominiums and townhomes. Many of the older apartments are being converted to attached dwelling units to revitalize the community. The Miami vernacular design of the building is like no other within our surrounding area. Many of the attached dwelling units in this area have a square box look. This architecturally styled building with its unusual building lines, balconies and mixed roof heights (to aesthetically hide mechanical equipment) is like a new face lift to the community. Back-out parking has been removed, an enhanced flow of vehicles has been designed and you will not see parked cars all over this site parking any which way they can. The current site has no landscaping in the front and the landscaping between the units and on the side yards are minimal. We have included landscaping throughout the property to compliment the building's architectural appearance. 6. The design will not cause any adverse effects. The development will bring new life to Skiff Point, a run-down street with dwelling units being built anywhere from 25-40 something years ago. The visual appearance will be Miami vernacular. There will not be acoustic, olfactory or hours of operation impacts to any adjacent properties being these are residential units. The current site is merely all concrete in the front setback for parking and a dumpster. We have minimized the visual sight of parking spaces with a 5' landscaped buffer running along the west and east side of the property. There will also be a 36" non-opaque fence on the east side of the property running along the pool side for extra privacy. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR 2 C! ORIGINAL RECEIVED 110 9 2006 PLANNING DEPA Mt i%F CITY O :V A1kA0,C;.-. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Residential Infill Project Criteria) 1. The irregular shape of this parcel together with the unprecedented cost of property and construction make this development impractical without the minimal deviations from the development standards. Although variances to setbacks have been requested, we have managed to stay above the minimum setbacks required by code and the variances primarily relate to the setback of required pedestrian pathways, trash staging areas and the pool area. 2. The fair market value of surrounding parcels will not be reduced. All properties on Clearwater Beach, Island Estates have increased four-fold within the last few years. This has been the case for buildings that were built 40 years ago. The current assessed value based on the Pinellas Property Appraiser's records is $1.3 million and upon redevelopment of the site, the just market value is estimated at $6 million. 3. The use is attached dwelling which is a permissible use within the City of Clearwater. 4. The use of the parcel, attached dwelling units is consistent with the entire block of Skiff Point. 5. Some of the many rewards provided to the immediate vicinity through this development proposal include but are not limited to improved and responsible site drainage, a new building which meets current codes relating to construction and fire. Additionally, this development proposal will greatly improve the value of the existing site, thereby providing improved values for the immediate area and an increase to the City's tax base. 6. Through creative architectural and site design this residential infill project achieves improved form and function by providing appropriate parking with internal circulation, decreased and improved access point with the required site visibility triangles; responsible site drainage and an improved streetscape with professionally landscaped yards. 7. In order to take advantage of this particular property's prime location, deviations to the required setbacks and height are necessary due to the irregular shape of the parcel along with a 5' utility easement running along the east side of our property. Side setbacks are also being requested in order to allow for easy vehicle movement. We have maintained a side setback of 5' to pavement which is consistent with other approved projects on this street. The rear setback is to water and has no affect on surrounding property owners. Water sight triangles, along with ingress/egress sight triangles are being adhered to. The site currently has back-out parking, a dumpster wide open in 3 • 1 the front of the property and run down apartment units. All of Island Estates is surrounded by water; whether it be inter-coastal or Clearwater Bay, etc., bringing back the upscale community that Island Estates has been known for since its inception. This will be a boost for the City as a whole even though this is one small community in itself. Through creative design this development proposal provides many positive rewards for the immediate vicinity and will be a wonderful enhancement to the community and Clearwater as a whole. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAPW.4"E& 4 • Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-5624865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) ORIGINAL PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PLANNING APPLICANT NAME: Mize & Sefair Development CITY OF C MAILING ADDRESS: 1725 Y2 East 7 Avenue, Suite 2, Tampa, FL 33605 PHONE NUMBER: 813-241-4664 CELL NUMBER: 813-842-5615 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Affordable Dental, LLC & New Horizons Properties, LLC List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 727-709-0943 E-MAIL ADDRESS: Doreen@northsideengineering.com 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: landscape buffers from 10' to a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. N/A OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 1 The 12 pink trumpet trees will offer great buffering along with bright colors 2 20 trees 10' in height will provide substantial visual enhancement 3 Multi-layering of shrubs on the west side of the property 4 The proposed landscape plan exceeds the number planting required by code 2. LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Z:ICIwApplications12006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 0 a No lighting is proposed at the current time. Upon submittal of lighting, all lights comprise of down-lighting and not spread onto adjacent lots. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The proposed installation of over 700 new plantings consisting of 9 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The number, size, quality and design of the proposed plantings will offer upgraded and Positive value to the immediate vicinity. The current landscaping is sparse and has no comparison to the proposed plantings. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. ORIGINAL N/A RECEIVED OV 09 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE I, the and igned, acknowledge that all representations made in this cation are true and accurate to the best of my know a and authorize City representatives to visit and phot aph the property described in this application. of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEeS om to nd subscribed before me this L day of (..? , A.D. 20 O?to me and/or by - vyhg is personally known has produced II??(( as identification. NMary public, My commission expires: JV . z0 / t.7 ?,??y.YIUOGn DOREEN A. WILLIAMS ys, c MY COMMISSION # DD 576718 'for nog EXPIRES: October 14, 2010 y Discount Assoc. 00- 1-800-3-NOTARY FL Notar Z. 0w Applications12006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 2 of 2 November 1, 2006 Mr. James Keller Fire Inspector II City of Clearwater Fire Department 610 Franklin Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: 240 & 250 Skiff Point FLD Case Dear Inspector Keller: CIVIL C LAND PLANNING O ENVIRONMENTAL C TRANSPORTATION C In speaking with Assistant Fire Marshal Leonard Rickard today, it has been determined that there is a proposed new water line in the design stage for Skiff Point on Island Estates. During our conversation Fire Marshal Rickard, he stated that full fire flow calculations would not be necessary for this submittal. We have attached the current hydrant test performed by the City of Clearwater. It has been agreed upon between the two of us that upon completion of the fire line installation, fire flow calculations will be provided. Sincerely, A 0 AiL h"d&-)t6 oreen A. Williams Project Director ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 92006 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATF 08/07/2006 15:04 7275624° PUBLIC UTILITIEls PAGE 02 LOCATION i '5"K' TE OF FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT -pr) STATIC: PSI I c RESIDUAL, PSI 6-D Gr- IPITOT PSI z/0 : J XY FLOW GPM I V (D . -?kr- / I lHYDRANTX IMISC: Co (f -4 oen. i A - oovl?ksi'jt 9 ? CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEIZ Z(@URI B*( CIVIL C LAND PLANNING o ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION C STORMWATER REPORT FOR: 240-250 SKIFF POINT ?.,. A Ram A. Goel, Ph.D., P.E. 47431 July 26, 2006 Project No. 0627 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED b0V 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • w DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The project is located in section 8, township 29 and range 15 in the City of Clearwater. The contiguous owned property is 17,398 sf and consists of the construction of 11 Units condominiums and associated utilities, parking and road infrastructure, storm management system and utilities and results in the following: • REMOVAL of 2,106 S.F. existing impervious vehicular use area and 8,401 S.F. of existing building and sidewalk area. • Construction of 3,323 S.F. of open impervious vehicular use area and 8,645 S.F. of new building and sidewalk. This will yield a 1,217 S.F. INCREASE of impervious vehicular use area subject to stormwater runoff. Overall there will be a 1,461 S.F. INCREASE in total impervious area. Discharge is into intercoastal waters and 3/" water quality attenuation is provided over the entire 17,398 sf yielding a total required treatment volume of 1,087 cf. 1,200 cf of storage volume is provided in the retention vault between elevation 1.8 and the design high water quality elevation of 3.8. This volume is recovered through 15 I.f. of 6" underdrain at invert elevation of 0.8 within 16.7 hours. Overflow beyond the required treatment volume is discharged through the top of grate and discharged into the intercoastal Clearwater Bay area. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MOV 0 9 2005 PLANNING DEPAR,ty,-.,v) CITY OF CLEAP '-,' s. w PROJECT NAME : PROJECT NO.: VAULT STORAGE DATA T.O.B. EL.= D.H.W. & W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= of 240-250 SKIFF POINT 0627 STAGE ft AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 5.00 600 0.014 1,920 4.00 600 0.014 1,320 3.80 600 0.014 1,200 3.25 600 0.014 870 2.75 600 0.014 570 2.50 600 0.014 420 2.25 600 0.014 270 2.00 600 0.014 120 1.80 600 0.014 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 17,398 SF 0.75 IN 1,087 CF 3.80 FT 1,200 CF r NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: 240-250 SKIFF POINT PROJECT NO.: 0627 VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,200 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 3.80 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 1.80 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 0.80 K = 0.09 FT/MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 15 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH w POND AREA (SF) = 600 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 600 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 3.80 600 2.50 0.50 2.75 0.91 24 1.93 300 156 3.30 600 2.00 0.50 2.75 0.73 24 1.54 300 195 2,80 600, 1.50 0.50 2.75 0.55 24 1.16 300 259 2.30 600 1.00 0.50 2.75 0.36 24 0.77 300 389 1.80 600 TIME = 999 MINUTES TIME = 16.7 HOURS ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 9 2006 PLANNING ufvAR, CITY OF CLEAPtoo - ( " 4 0 0 Butler Design Group, Inc Charles R. Butler 4203 46 h Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33714 Ph (727) 521-1684 Fax (727) 527-7422 E-mail: Mg a tampabay.ir.com Tree Inventory 240,250 Skiff Point As required by the City of Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (4" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1-5) and any potential hazards of these trees. OTY/ TREE DBH & SPECIES / RATING AND COMMENTS 1 15" Sabal Palm 3 2 14" Sabal Palm 3 3 10" Slash Pine 3 4 10" Slash Pine 3 5 10" Slash Pine 3 6 14" Slash Pine 3 7 13" Washingtonia Palm 3 8 5" Fishtail Palm 3 9 13" Washingtonia Palm 3 10 7" Washingtonia Palm 3 11 Areca Cluster 3 12 13" Washingtonia Palm 3 13 Areca Cluster 4 14 Areca Cluster 4 15 6" Citrus 3 16 12" Canary Palm 3 17 Schefflera Cluster 3 MGM 18 16" Canary Palm 3 `' 19 Schefflera Cluster 3 W 11 20 10" Sabal Palm 3 21 6" Citrus 3 PUENRNG DE VA • • 22 12" Sabal Palm 3 23 13" Canary Palm 3 24 5" Schefflera 3 25 4" Robelenii Palm 3 26 4" Robelenii Palm 3 I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL-1235A Butler Design Group/ Golden Rain Nursery, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ? 0V 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTIV 01 CITY OF CLEARWATER S Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 4 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION W/ _SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets t? W"'_ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ -r CASE #: t- Lt! k A RP RECEIVED BY (staff initii-1s), DATE RECEIVED: 7/A * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: ..7?? L...... ?A5.c_.._?1 ........ ......r7. .......S.S.c-r. G-...2._?.... RiK .R......__Y.....L....-3. ....__-. PHONE NUMBER: a?jL._s...'..T ?I.1..'._? G.4. ............................................._._.........._...._ CELL NUMBER: Z...'._S ?S._........... PROPERTY OWNER(S): .... ................ .................................................................._ ................................................../_._..__._...__........__.......,.......A..,...._....,._..........._._.._._.._..._....._._....._..........._..................... List ALL owners on the deed Cb ,c./? L?.?S ?n./1 d. x 7'')f_S Lw 4 40 AGENT NAME: ///I MAILING ADDRESS: C.! D...L..........? fl ? ........ -5 of 4..... _?7._.....1 PHONE NUMBER: 4/3 -.ZB FAX NUMBER: `1.7 x -_?? ................._.__......... _. * 03 L? CELL NUMBER: 17_ C7 ?l - O E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: PROJECT VALUATION: $ STREET ADDRESS - -- 2_?.?_._a PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ?v S/? Or?j/A /?,s tfC.0.? 44?-? PROPOSED USE(S): / /nl DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: S?i ?.C. ........ _ . ............... Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square - ...................... --- footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of --._._.... _...... parking spaces, specific use; etc.) . 1. _ 1-.L -.L . ORIGINAL oa XAClw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 1 of 8 C: r DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PR VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES - NO _ toof (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ,Sf .........: ?.. /JaF .... ................. .._............ -..._._.... _................ _......... 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ..._......_..-. .... ...... ...__..._._.__..._.........._ .................... _._._/.......... __.......--.......... --.._..._.............._._..__...... _..._.............. -------- ._....._._._._ ------ ---- _----.-.-- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. J? !!! ?? .......................... ....... -..... -..... -------...................... ........ -......... _....... ._._.._---- ...... ................ ..-._......... -..__......_..-_.._............._._....---._.._.._._._...._...._...... .._. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SZ? _,4tr C'.(. ........ ........................ _....... RECEIVED X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. .>4._...._4...6C.09'4?_.a.._._...._..___ ................ ..-.._..._.... _....... _.._.._._._...-------_---- .-.__.-._._.__..... ............ ...___.--------- _....._...._._.._------ -__- 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. -- ---- - ----- - 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ............ 4444e.!`. .................... ......._....._...... _................ .............. _._--...._...... ......... .._............._..._.............. _.-.-_._ ...................... ---._.._.__._....._......_.....__..........-..........._..._._.....__............. - --- -- --------- - ----- 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. .5 ........_fF.L?Z? ../c.c, ...................... _._._......... _......... ............ .................... _....... ---- ...... -......... _.............. _._...._...-- ..._._..._.......... ..._....... .....__............... _.......__..__.......... --................ .......... ......_..._...._....... _....... --....... _.............. _..... _._._..._ 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ell ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 X1CIw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 3 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER F-1 L_. J lil E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) v""A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition \ or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? \ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? roposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; p?TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Ul/TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; Q-' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; APARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). - Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; &K"-GRADING PLAN, as applicable; A- PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); AVr`COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 28 2006 X;\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER El • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ?t Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ?> hII dimensions; u F?otprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; F otprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; AI existing and proposed points of access; I required sight triangles; I entification of environmentally unique. areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including x escription and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; .................. K _ ocation of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; [and ocation of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas n water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Y Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; 1 Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ................ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ................... E SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; ................... Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; arking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the umber of required spaces; otal paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; .................. Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED ------ _...___-- DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ORIGINAL All open space areas; RECEIVED Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); JUL 2 8 2006 Streets and drives (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWATER Structural overhangs; xAclw Applicaions\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 5 of 8 • M H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; t'< Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ......k Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; X Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ................. Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant x schedule; ................. Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all X existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and ,d,' protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and x percentage covered; ................... _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. 5a REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/z X 11); a--",-COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 11.. /BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) V /BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; V All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; ................ . Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'h X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8'%X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infll Project (FLD) 2006.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 6 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER • M K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) l7 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. a'*?_ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. Tfie study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. El Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. i-}f_ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. -z?.? CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. ORIGINAL RECEIVED If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. JUL 28 200 M. SIGNA I, the un rsigned, acknowledge that all representations made in tw a lication are true and accurate to the best of my kn le a and authorize City representatives to visit and p tog aph the property described in this application. CITY OF C STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2_:I_ day of A.D. 20 CX_e to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. ture of property owner or representative <-/ K431ary public, My commission expires: 10.14-OL4 X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Inrll Project (FLD) 2006. MY COMMISSION # DD 155802 Fi-wo-3-NOTARY r$v(U? DOREEN A. WILLIAMS Page 7 of 8 EXPIRES: October 14, 2006 FL NotaN Ser`^- 8 Bonding, Inc. lil r N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names Of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: , -1c 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ? t 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: r r [<.1r LtC _ a ?%?'? ?'?1 x '?L. u. ? C' :?...1 _? {.r ....??{>{,?,??.?.__.. .__.t'?.f y1 ?.....!? r J ...... ._ ,..- ..._...,.. _.__....._...... as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;. 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; and correct. the undersi n d aut ority, hereby er at the foregoing is tru ? ...... .... .. .......... - ope Own / Property Owner ........................ - roperty Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ?CrP day of 8,t f ???( personally appeared y -Jt i {?fj? avho having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: j b - i A `? -6ar X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01,doc Page 8 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPAkINIEW CITY OF CLEARW` TER SwAaa loot July 27, 2006 Mr. James Keller Fire Inspector Il City of Clearwater Fire Department 610 Franklin Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: 240 & 250 Skiff Point FLD Case Dear Inspector Keller: CIV ° LAND PLANNING a ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION G In speaking with Assistant Fire Marshal Leonard Rickard today, it has been determined that there is a proposed new water line in the design stage for Skiff Point on Island Estates. During our conversation Fire Marshal Rickard, he stated that full fire flow calculations would not be necessary for this submittal. A hydrant test has been scheduled with the City of Clearwater, but as of this date, we have not received the results. These will be forwarded to your office upon receipt. Sincerely, oreen A. Williams Project Director ORIGINAL RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 JUL 2 8 2006 CITY OF C>L, +''?hl?(r? rl5 I#: 2005082315 BK: 14155 PG: x03/04/2005 at 12 $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $3676.40 KEN BURKE, COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 Jan. 28--05 e.12: 3t3P r„ C l/ 58 PM, REG0NG 2 PAGES CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS 727-464-4571 P.01 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COU PINEWIS COUNTY F INST# 2005073 812005 at 11:21 AM OFF REC .14142 PG: 679.680 DocT :DEED RECORDING: $18.50 STAMP: S0.70 A298.10 - QLATCLAIM DEED ^-? R298.04 / r TWS QUITCLAIM DEED, Executed this Oay of (year), by"unt party, Grantor, whose post office address is X3Z S` ?? Da ?5 ??N Ges to second parry, Grantee. New CLOY' zons fro e, I'es LLC W110SC pits! UffiCC address is Han JU/1 s m-? 1? e- ' j )al JFlorida .?v?? 7.5"6 WITNESSETH, 'Chat the said first party, for good consideration and for the sum of Dollars ($ 1 i?ID ) paid by the said second Marty, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the said secoi?d party forever, all the right, title, interest toad claim which chit said first party has in and to the following described parcol of land, and improvements and appurtenances there- to in the County of State of ?_4 4 to wit. i 33767 D[ R nA (s4 0t a? C. I w U n 1.? J -A b ORIGINAL RECEIVED - JUL 2 8 2006 ? r PLANNING DEPARTMENT C 1w1-20W U4 uJU Sof... &W, .' A(1)W, CITY OF CLEARWATER 71-1 PMQ? doq a?mNCOn .1 ramioii WU1* I a¦ ¦nd" inn • J%&j ¦dvlps iV iCl7ims. 714a Pmdvat is uuend Y.lv tip nit. mu,art. chit W rot 11110,4,U4,61 i • use 010y and it lux a substitute for les'l Woduol u1< Oct nt'tM¦rlly DflM,ed by 1 A,Y'.,r liteoaed to rwx.jeo law in chi, .'Lvc PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC Jan-28-0E 12:39P r? BKO155 PG 504 Clearwatutr-, Law Library a iN WITNESS WHERE,.OF,`T(ie.-said first puny hu written. Signed, sealed and. del ivVed in presence of. arure of Wiine s'.....,' inl name or • 727-464-4571 P.02 signed and sealed thrse presents the day and year first above in re of First Party dune 5 0 S a?? P 4ninrnv: 0f Witness Pint name of Flrsi Duty State of 1'?Qw t 3 } ..'Cpunty of r"?a??o?. On Vebr?-at`y &5 ? before me, yPpe ucd Ua'rneS (7- S-ha,'P-C -,A ficmnelly known to inc (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be tho person(s) whose 114 S) is/ure subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helthehhey executed the same in his/tur/their ;at,tl)Qrged, capacity(ies), and that by hisfher/their signature(s) on the instrument the parson(s), or dte entity upon .be!(at?, off Which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WFC?JE toytiand+uhd official seal. ?Signuture of N Affiant Known Produccd ID y ss ?`. ?`r? _1G J p PY 1 D aoo n >? ? 0? TyPe of lb !. ' (Scat) YY)Z ?•,:_ On F ¢ 1?C ??n cy ckG1a00S before me, `(lQ.rNcy appeired personally known to Pne (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory cyidencc) to be tic person(s) whose name(s) Wwc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heishehhey executed the sumc in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hisMerltheir signatu*&) on the instument the person(s), or die entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, exce0ed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ,n ?1?i Notary Afftanr Known Pruduced ID C Chi ca?,r? rn ?1tM etc (fit t? S Type of ID' _ (Seal) Signature of Preparer - _T Print Nume of f'rcparer Add=s of PreparcrJ (2)1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 s 2006 PLANNING DEPARTM[NT CITY OF CLEARWAT R t I#: 2005082314 BK: 14155 PG: 1-0 03/04/2005 at 12:58 PM, REC06G 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $3371.20 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 Jan-28--05 . 7.2:3SP Claarwatar Law Library 727-464-4671 P.01 d? s, ersa+ KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COU PINELLAS COUNTY FL INST# 20060739 28/2005 at 11:21 AM OFF REC 4142 PG: 677 678 DocT :DEED RECORDING: $18.60 p STAMP: $0.70 A298.10 QUITCLAIM .DEED MS QUITCLAIM DEED., Executed this ,?Jrday of `-by'first party, Grantor, I r' X30 ao ?? l1 Aq whose post office address is --? to second party, trrflrlteC, v whose past office address is q30 WaI4 WITNESSETH, Than the said fast party, for good wrisideradon and for the sum of Dollars ($ ?? )'paid by the said second parry, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the said second peaty forever, all the right, title, interest and claim which the said first party has in and to the following described parcel of land, and improvements and appurtenances there- ORIGINAL to in the County of , State of to wit: RECEIVED JIJL 2 8 201 CITY Of CLLEARiA asa c,:?-A Lb? 41 kTER ,` (t) 1 J D L.L Leda110lYV:. -\?? AHM 71 1u Wmdu ooua dOt., nca co<witwa ,M rvnuari„j of IqV ?Ovla it &hlnu. TWeproouct ie udcrdW fa InfotANGo,ul u Rev &W ++:sa .Gait ia..a wrv. ui CIM, w anOmav - all Ic¢al MOW%. 17,16 OrarINC7 w1,, tot 0111Y ndA is /,tit i su6ltilule for 16141 nRa«arilr txcnata! nv a n+non Irrea,.od 10 M4?.ie! 14w in tit rtyc PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BIM155 PG 502 -.Jan-7.,2B.-0&_12:39P Clearwater Law Library 727-464-4571 P.02 W WITNESS WHERFOZ'Th isid first puny his signed and sealed these presents the day Brill year First abos'e wrlttcn. Signed, sealed snd deliyered In presence oft Ll""? SiQ u of First Parry 1 C)-- k, 61 G? J?/c Sc Print narne of Winless Print name of Flt t Party 1 State of f)ew t(YI -v In County of-c?d.°?``,,,,?,? On ?.zlo(`u a i ads '?Cfnrc me. O a-nc.y Sc hae-Pu- .. uPpuued .W%nnully known to otc (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) i5/ure subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heish0they executed the some in his/licr/their Authorized capacily(ies), and that by histherhheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or dte entity upon betralf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. }r1UrtMSS my hand and official seal. 5rg ?L[N6xary - ?? Co?miSSt ?e Affiant Knowr, Produced ID y a,-t ?tcPt 5 t.? 4_ ? ::_ GL{>i` .? .t O i ap?'?-• ?'Pe of 1D _ _ "_ (Scut) GuuntY'?' On a>; ro?S acoro me, 3(x"%es O. shne-op f' personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory cyidence) to bc.thc pcrsou(s) whose name(s) isJnrc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the sums in his/her/their audiprized ctipacity(ies), end that by his/her/their signature(s) on the initrument the person(s), or the entity upon .beli if of whir?t the person(s) acted. executed the instrument. dTl;{ESS:fny h4nd and official seal, t 0'y rr: „g?G r, f'Netary.' Affiant Known Produced ID r^?'•:. rid,.. r.?. .r? i ;,? ?'L;G %y \? r rly Cov rim, SSto-, ?KPtl e5 "Type of ID-__.... ?aF i I ?O, dCA?- (seat) Signature of Preparer Print Nume of Pieparer Adddross of Preparet ?• M ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • UTTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Northside Engineering services, Inc. to act as an agent for Affordable Dental, LI-C. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 250 Skiff Point, Clearwater. (Property Location) PIN ELLAS Count State of FLORIDA. gr. at'ire of roperty Owner 430 Jasmine Way Address of Property Owner _Clearwater, FL 33756 City/State/Zip Code ctVV\?'S _C SC `?- Print Narne of Property Owner S Title q- -3 Telepi one Number State of The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this°,day Cou y of?a" f') f/ rt of 20 ?J?! by: v f a?ijf? 5 ? .fir t2 ?L ( as ("4,l o J LA-11 wiio is personally known to me - Y Q y as identification and who did (ems-rtet) take an oath. a g ?r ??-4C, Notary Public - -' (S ig natu ?e) ? s Commission # (SEAL ABOVE) Nf? / (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamr&GlNAL JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY CE CLEARWATER 0 • LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Nnrthside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for New Horizons Properties, LLC. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 240 Skiff Point, Clearwater. (Property Location) PI ELLAS County, State of FLORIDA. e / ignatur? of Property O?u'?'ner 430 Jasmine Way Address of Property Owner Clearwater FL 33756 City/State/Zip Code Print Name of ?roperty Owner 1 Title Telephone Number State of 14C et" The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this C?bday County of 131Vf'l-t_)q--s of 20 by as /'-e?i who is personally known to me AJ , as identification and who did (dtd-rot-) take an oath. DENISE MIKE F :Notary Public - State of Florida W(,cxrunh9onf xl k%Dac 4.2007 61YnIv Commission # DD272642 Notary Public (Signafurd)-, J > Commission # (SEAL ABOVE) (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) RECEIVED J L 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent" Name) with Northside Engineering Services, InC. to act as an agent for Affordable Dental, LLC. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 250 Skiff Point, Clearwater. (Property Location) PIN_ELLAS County, State of FLORIDA. ature wn 430 Jasmine Way Address of Property Owner Clearwater, FL 33756 City/State/Zip Code State of County of Print Name of Property Owner u\ o IV( Title Telephone Number ?14 The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this cc?, day of 201 by ?_ ?c2,>;,c??LL?.uE as s i ??? who is personally known to me =Slate as identification and who did (d?"Gt) take an oath. Ftotid® o4,2007 2542 Notary Public (Signature) Commission # (SEAL ABOVE) :? !??,lf? (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Or CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION JIJL 282006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER This letter will serve as authorization for 110ush Ghovaee (agent Name) with gorthsige Engineering Services, IN. to act as an agent for New Horizons Properties, LLC. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 240 Skiff Point, Clearwater. (Property Location) PINELLAS County, , tate of FLORIDA. /Signature of Property O . her 430 Jasmine Way Address of Property Owner Clearwater, FL 33756 City/State/Zip Code Print / me of Property Owner Title Telephone Number State of 6,4- The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this C?/,-' day County of of 201 (& by as 11r?5 i ev( ? who is personally known to me.Lr-whe-bias-.p;odA;teed- as klentification and who did (4d-P.at--take an oath. ,a , i r° N DENISE otary Pubiic Camnt?, • •- (SEAL ABOVE) /` (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) Gommtsslon ,,u.. Notary Public (Signal Commission # oao IL U u ooa ooe 5 umom 44 it 1 t; 6 1 9 ? y T . J ? I y t ,a .??r 0 I ? N r 't 1 rvY' ?? All property depictions, floor plans, and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. 940 . I I rojoArchitecture.com SOUTHWEST ELEVATION MAKO SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" PROPOSED FINISHES (D SAND FINISH STUCCO- PAINTED SW 7008 ALABASTER, TYP, Q2 SAND FINISH STUCCO - PAINTED SW 7061 MINDFUL GRAY Q3 NATURAL LIMSTONE, DALTILE JURASTONE; GREY-BLUE L712 Qq GLASS/ BLUE TINT STOREFRONT-ALUMINUM MILL FINISH, TYP. ON ALL FLOORS 0 CANOPY-PAINTED SW 6992 INKWELL, TYP. © GUARDRAIL - WHITE STEEL AND CLEAR GLASS; TYP. ON ALL FLOORS Q7 LIGHT BRONZE AND SATIN NICKEL FIXTURES p `E''SV `.E'; 6 ? F? M PF: T. 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com ROOF DECK +46.2' R F?I A D 0 n PLAZA DECK +0u 2'BFE , ------------\`------ - --------- -------- PDOLDECK ,ice -0.1V B F E FIFTH FLOOR n +35.7'35.7' B?F.E. FOURTH FLOOR n +25.2'BFE? THIRD FLOOR +13.7'BFEu SECOND FLOOR .. +4.8'BFE u BASE FLOOD ELEVATION -----------_ 11.8' A All property depictions, floorplans, and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. 9(40 rojoArchitecture,com 000 000 000 000 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION MAKO SCALE: 1/1611 =1'-0" M D E,. V• E L ? P,;;'' M E;.."H T;x 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www,mizeandselfair.com It ,: li L_ I .'l6 III1' • . % ? F Ia r ii J I IB.: I 1. Jn_Taf,C: ''.`GR ,SC 4. Eimrs CY nHFP.. NV?- LP cLr, u Xrn r.3µ 2 TaP '1 s I' S I 1 V,14 )ki' 'UV AX /1 wnF AuI sn:ul i r:10 X A':'A V V -SE - 115 F A. 9 E r r "W""L ' ul B 7P:W IN V"FRMn IE IJ fL] MW L i14-,lr Ill F SEVEL If .x NIM IS L AA l FA ? n mtsx . s ts. ?z :r. f nlt_'L?CvAELE'? .w.?A0:C5 'i SU-k'.X -Ni .F5°!.UYIV.V V FLP III 11All m ex's (2i I: ooiriwl„ -. 2' ,LUI a P_4: 12• 35" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR ELEVATION h0.i1 - LE\W-22817-70MH y?rar?yl \F40BX-120V .7w S h,Y117c r?Ni(JY J . LuiE: 'r/.I.'1 4:E nXArNt I:,. L22817R1 LIGHTING LIGHT BRONZE ` AND SATIN NICKEL FIXTURE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENS All property depictions, floorplans, and arrlirt renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect fn l building conditions. UN '1 DOS'!!E J7.KM?Y 35" VERTICAL STYLE ENV!SCR SECTION N A d pn I `I I ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS rojoArchitecture,com CITY SCAPES INC. ENVISOR 35 VERTICAL STYLE SLATE GRAY MAKO L4 U RAILING ELEVATION WHITE STEEL AND CLEAR GLASS NATURAL LIIME STONE DALTILE JURASTONE GREY-BLUE #L712 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com All property depictions, floorplans, and artist renderings areforgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions.. 0 Q rojoArchitecture,com MAKO NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" M EF. ,. I M L O. P' M ,E NZ "T 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com ,< M ?Y COMMON ELEVATOR TO POOL ENCLOSURE RECYCLING BINS W/ CHUTES FROM HALLWAY PLEASE NOTE THIS SHEET CONTAINS THE SAME INFORMATION AS THE SITE PLAN AND IS BEING SHOWN AT A DIFFERENT SCALE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A FIRST FLOOR PLAN VIEW AT THE SAME SCALE AS THE FLOOR PLANS ABOVE. All property depictions, floor plans, and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. o O rojoArchitectu re,com MAKO FLOOR PLAN 1,0 SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" b .sE.?:V_E L O 'P M Es t1V T'! 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com ,, a All property depictions, floorplanf and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. ma rojoArch itectu re,com SOUTHEAST ELEVATION M A KO SCALE: 1 /16" = P-0" PROPOSED FINISHES 01 SAND FINISH STUCCO- PAINTED SW 7008 ALABASTER, TYP. (2 SAND FINISH STUCCO- PAINTED SW 7061 MINDFUL GRAY 03 NATURAL LIMSTONE, DALTILE JURASTONE; GREY-BLUE L712 04 GLASS/ BLUE TINT STOREFRONT-ALUMINUM MILL FINISH, TYP. ON ALL FLOORS Q CANOPY - PAINTED SW 6992 INKWELL, TYP. © GUARDRAIL-WHITE STEEL AND CLEAR GLASS; TIP. ON ALL FLOORS 07 LIGHT BRONZE AND SATIN NICKEL FIXTURES D. 'E ` V E : G O P: M . Ek '.N T'. 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com All property depictions, floor plan; and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. U@ P rojoArchitecture com MAKO SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" 0 MECH. EQUIPMENT„ D E` ` V' ' E L O P M E 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com 01 I o I ; TO 1 ormOm u6wP0& I UWQ0XkKW I'll, UZOL All property depictions, floorplans, and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and maynot reflect final building conditions. U(40 roj oArc h itectu re, co m NORTHWEST ELEVATION MAKO SCALE; 1/16" =1'-0" PROPOSED FINISHES ?l SAND FINISH STUCCO- PAINTED SW 7008 ALABASTER,TYP. (2 SAND FINISH STUCCO - PAINTED SW 7061 MINDFUL GRAY Q3 NATURAL LIMSTONE, DALTILE JURASTONE; GREY-BLUE L712 Qq GLASS/ BLUE TINT STOREFRONT - ALUMINUM MILL FINISH, TYP. ON ALL FLOORS O CANOPY - PAINTED SW 6992 INKWELL TYP. © GUARDRAIL-WHITE STEEL AND CLEAR GLASS; TYP. ON ALL FLOORS 07 LIGHT BRONZE AND SATIN NICKEL FIXTURES 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com 4 All property depictions, floor plans, and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and maynot reflectfmal building conditions. U40 roj oA rc h itectu re , c o m MAKO NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE; 1/16" =1'-0" W D E V_ .E'. L ?. P- :-m E' N T- 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com Y PROPOSED FINISHES Ql SAND FINISH STUCCO- PAINTED SW 7008 ALABASTER, TYP. 02 SAND FINISH STUCCO - PAINTED SW 7061 MINDFUL GRAY 03 NATURAL LIMSTONE, DALTILE JURASTONE; GREY-BLUE L712 ® GLASS/BLUETINTSTOREFRONT - ALUMINUM MILL FINISH, TYP. ON ALL FLOORS O CANOPY-PAINTED SW 6992 INKWELL,TYP. © GUARDRAIL - WHITE STEEL AND CLEAR GLASS; TYP. ON ALL FLOORS 07 LIGHT BRONZE AND SATIN NICKEL FIXTURES A All property depictions, Jloorplans, and artist renderings are forgeneral information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. mo rojoArchitecture,com NORTHEAST ELEVATION MAKO SCALE; 1/16" =1'-0" H `IR .D E V, E L' O P M E y1N T 1725 E. 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FL (813) 241-4664 www.mizeandselfair.com V CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA .33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AvENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 { TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 22, 2007 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: FLD2006-07045 (240-250 Skiff Point) Dear Ms. Williams: l2Tt- ALL--C Oval- rz-&J . 98T This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. The CDB DENIED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.39-acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way; 2. That the property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District of the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD); 3. That the property is located within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan category; and 4. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the increased height does not result in an improved site plan; 2. That landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required do not improve the design and appearance; 3. That the increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land that is designated as Medium Density Residential (LDR) in the Zoning Atlas; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOFNSON, COUNCILMEMBER FILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBEP "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" March 22, 2007 0 0 FLD2006-07045 (240-250 Skiff Point) Page 2 of 2 4. That the design of the proposed residential infill project does not create a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; and 5. That the development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is practical without deviations from the intensity or other development standards Please be advised that pursuant to Section 4-202.G.I of the Community Development Code, no application shall be accepted for nine months after the denial of a substantially similar application affecting the same property or any portion thereof as a Level Two (Flexible Development) application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(cDmyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) IInactive or Finished ApplicationslSkiff Point 240-250 - Mako (MHDR-IEOD) - DeniedISkiff Point 240-250 - Development Order 02-20-07.doc LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: February 5, 2007 To: Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Mako Condominiums - FLD2006-07045 - 240 & 250 Skiff Point NES Proj#. 627 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: L? 4 ,. .:' AL X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 15 Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 15 Sets (4 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, 1 Signed and Sealed 15 Architectural Plans Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By. oreen A. illiams, Project Director Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams 7! 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED "B 0 5 2007 PLANNING DEPARIMEN° CITY OF CLEARWATER ' o CIVIL 0 LAND PLANNING O ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION O October 31, 2006 Mr. Robert Tefft Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-07045 - 240 Skiff Point DRC Response Dear Mr. Tefft: Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on November 2, 2006. General Engineering - Prior to issuance of Building Permit 1. It is acknowledged that all City details applicable to this project be shown. 2. It is acknowledged that the applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device and all associated fees and other installation fees. 3. A note will be provided on the plan indicating that the FDC shall be installed at least 15-feet from the face of building prior to building permitting. 4. A note will be provided on the plan indicating that the FDC shall be located no further than 40-feet from the nearest FHA prior to building permitting. 5. It is acknowledged that fire hydrant assembly installed greater than 10' from the water main will be constructed on ductile iron pipe. 6. It is acknowledged that the applicant shall install a cleanout at the end of the existing sewer lateral. 7. A copy of the approved Health permit will be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. A copy of the approved DEP permit will be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. It is acknowledged that a CO will not be issued until completion of proposed water line is installed. 10. Five sets of as-built drawings will be submitted prior to issuance of CO 11. Condo Plat will be recorded and provided to the City. Environmental 1. A vault maintenance schedule will be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Fire 1. See revised architectural plans addressing BFE for standpipe system. 2. Fire calculations will be provided upon installation of new waterline. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 of3 Page 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 - 8036 s s Mr. Robert Tefft October 31, 2006 Page Two Land Resource 1. Tree Preservation plan will be provided prior to building permitting. 2. Existing grades are provided on the grading plan, see sheet C3.1. Landscaping 1. See revised L 1.1. 2. See revised L1.1. 3. See revised L1.1. 4. See revised L1.1. 5. See revised L1.1. 6. See revised L1.1. 7. See revised L 1.1. 8. Comprehensive Landscape Program application is attached Parks and Recreation 1. Recreation impact fee to be paid prior to building permit or fmal plat. Stormwater 1. See new survey attached with 50 foot of adjacent topography. Also shown on Sheet C3.1. Solid Waste I . Room is provided for recycling bins, see revised architectural plan Traffic Engineering Prior to Building Permit 1. Do not enter signage is no longer needed. See revised driveway on Sheet 2.1. 2. The word "stop bar" is noted on sheet C2.1. General Notes: I. Transportation Fee Ordinance and fee schedule are acknowledged. 2. It is acknowledged that there may be additional comments forthcoming upon Building permit Application submittal. Planning 1. ISR is revised, see sheet C1.1. 2. See revised narrative of Flex Development Application. 3. See revised narrative of Flex Development Application. 4. See revised narrative of Flex Development Application. 5. See sheet C2.1 for revised sight visibility triangle. 6. See revised architectural plans for mechanical screening. 7. See sheet C2.1 for revised egress two-way drive. 8. Architectural and civil plans are coordinated for trash areas. 9. See sheet C 1.1 for revised pool desk setback. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NO 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2of3 f S Mr. Robert Tefft October 31, 2006 Page Three Plannine continued 10. See revised architectural plan for fence. 11. See revised architectural plans for coordination of roof plan and elevations. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, ` oreen A. Williams Project Director Enc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWNTER Page 3 of 3 10:40 am { • 0 Case Number : FLD2006-07045 -- 240 SKIFF PT Owner(s): Affordable Dental Llc 430 Jasmine Way Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Owner(s): New Horizons Properties Llc 430 Jasmine Way Clearwater, FI 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Mize And Sefair Development 1725 1/2 East 7th Avenue Tampa, Fl 33605 TELEPHONE: 813-241-4664, FAX: 813-842-5615, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Northside Engineering Services Inc 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727446-8036, E-MAIL: Doreen@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.40 acres at the northwest comer of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: IEOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: Flexible Development approval to permit l l attached dwelling units within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechancial equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from, 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Island Estates Civic Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 140 Island Way TELEPHONE: 442-2237, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 17 • Prior to issuance of a building permit: C? 1. Applicant shall show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp . 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 3. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be installed at least 15-feet from the face of building. 4. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no further than 40-feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). 5. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 6. Applicant shall install a cleanout at the end of the existing sewer lateral in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index # 305. 7. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main prior to issuance of a building permit. The health permit application form(s) can be found at: www.dep.state.fl.us/water/drinkingwater/forms.htm 8. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 9. A CO will not be issued until completion of the proposed water line along Skiff Point. The applicant shall contribute to the cost of the water line installation. 10. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. 11. Applicant shall provide to the City a recorded copy of the Condominium Plat for: Mako Condominium. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Prior to Building Permit: 1. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 18 An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. I00psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 10/24/2006 Letter of Sept. 19, 2006 acknowledged Class I standpipe system and the new fire pump and 100psi at roof but did NOT address the BFE,MUST be located above the BFE. Acknowledge comment PRIOR to CDB 62. 8/21/2006 Prior to a Building Permit being issued, fire flow calculations have to be completed. Letter dated July 27,2006 indicates that the fire flow calculations are not necessary for DRC submittal but they WILL be needed for Building Permit. 10/24/2006 Letter of Sept.19,2006 states that PRIOR to building permit fire flow calculations will be provided.(JFK) Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. 2. Provide the existing grades on the grading plan so a tree impact assessment can be performed. Provide prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 19 • • Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.I of the Community Development Code, the perimeter landscape requirements necessitate the provision of 13 perimeter trees. As two (2) accent trees count for one (1) shade tree only eight (8) trees have been provided to meet this requirement. 4,taE( *w I I. 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, at time of planting -; za l shrubs shall have a height between 18" and 24" when used in a perimeter landscape buffer and shall be planted every 36" on center. The proposed Indian Hawthorne does not meet this requirement. 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan. Clarify the intent of the Comprehensive Landscape application. What requirements are intended to be modified? 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan. Pursuant to Section 3-1204.D of the Community Development Code, all landscaping is to be '}?ijGG `R7 protected from vehicular traffic by curbing and wheel stops along the perimeter of any --? landscaping adjoining vehicular use areas. Curbing has not been proposed at the north end of the manuvering area for the western parking tier. 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan. ;5% Landscape Plan note #8 must be revised. It is inconsistent with the Code as well as the development proposal. 0 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan, f 6 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.I of the Community Development Code, no more than 25% of the I Oe kz? Do required trees may be accent trees. As proposed, 50% of the required trees would be accent trees. "'M ro M;--. 1%&-M-tT 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan. Landscape Plan note #3 must be revised to be consistent with the Code. Railroad ties are not an 'OK acceptable means of protection for landscape areas. 10-04-06: The landscape plan has not been revised to match the site plan. '? You have stated in your response letter that the Comprehensive Landscape Program application so. has been deleted, why? Section 3-1202.D.1 requires the provision of 10' landscape buffers along the east and west property lines and only 5' has been proposed. Parks and Recreation: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art kader at 727-562-4824. Stormwater: Solid Waste: Prior to CDB provide 50 foot of adjacent topography per Section E. of the submittal form for flexible standard. This is to include the exact location of the existing 36"RCP along the east property line. Prior to issuance of a building permit please provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. make sure there is room for recycling bins in trash area or on complex Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 20 • • Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Provide do not enter signage where appropriate. 2. Paint the word stop just below the stop bar. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 21 • Pursuant to Section 2-401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR) within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District is 0.85. While the development proposal complies with this requirement at 0.69, the site data table denotes a maximum ISR of 0.95. Please correct. 10-04-06: This comment has not been addressed. ,,4:' Pursuant to Section 2.404.F.5 of the Community Development Code, provide a response that states how developing the parcel as a residential infill project upgrade the immediate vicinity. The response provided does not address how the development of the parcel as a Residential Infill project (and per those criteria) will result in an upgrade to the immediate vicinity. 10-04-06: The revised response does not address the criteria. However, it is noted that the application erroneously states a duplicate criterion. Provide a response to the criterion as stated in Section 2-404.F.5 of the Community Development Code. yr3"°` Pursuant to Section 2.404.A.4 of the Community Development Code, off-street parking shall be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet (4') in height. Screening is required along the south, east and west. 10-04-06: The site plan does not depict anything with regard to this comment and the landscape plan is not consistent with the revised site plan. X0 Pursuant to Section 2.404.F.7 of the Community Development Code, a response is required stating how a reduced setback and an increased height are justifiable based upon how this setback and height benefit the community character and immediate vicinity. The response provided requires some correction. First, as a Residential Infill project there are no minimum lot width standards; thus a reduction is not necessary. Second, the response states you are requesting a reduction to height, which is obviously not the case. Finally, the response states that the deviations are consistent with those previously approved developments to the west, which is not entirely accurate as the subject proposal requests greater and/or more substantial deviations to the front and side setbacks that those developments did. In addition to the above, the response needs to indicate how the required deviations are a benefit to the community character and immediate vicinity. 10-04-06: The revised response does not address the requested front setback deviation or the request for increased height. Further, the recent amendments to the off-street parking requirements are completely irrelevant to this request. ?5! Pursuant to Section 3.904.13 of the Community Development Code, no structure or landscaping may be installed, other than a fence around a swimming pool or any other non-opaque fence not exceeding 36 inches, in the [20' sight visibility triangle located at the corners of the property abutting the water]. The site and landscape plans depict ten-foot sight visibility triangles at the property corners abutting the water. Further, the landscape plan depicts substantial landscaping within the northwest corner in conflict with the above. 10-04-06: The site and landscape plans continue to depict 10' sight visibility triangles where 20' sight visibility triangles are required. Depict the locations of all mechanical equipment and the means by which they are to be screened. 10-04-06: The roof plan depicts mechanical equipment being screened by a screened enclosure; however no information is provided as to the appearance of the enclosure. The development proposal includes a pair of one-way drive aisles when a single two-way drive aisle could easily be accommodated at the western drive aisle. It is recommended that the one-way ingress drive aisle is eliminated and the egress drive is converted to two-way. 49! The architectural site plan depicts a trash enclosure, where a trash staging area is proposed on the civil site plan. Revise the architectural site plan to match the civil. ,Y? The site data table states that the rear setback to the pool deck is 87; however this actually appears to be the pool setback with the pool deck setback being 0'. Please revise. Provide a detail of the proposed 36" high non-opaque PVC fencing. According to the elevations ?Rl it looks like a 10' high solid wall. ?1 - The roof top enclosure as depicted on the northeast and southwest elevations is not consistent with it's depiction on the roof plan. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 22 0 0 Notes: This development proposal has been tentatively scheduled for the 12/19/06 CDB agenda. In order to remain on this agenda, submit 15 collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comments by Noon, Thursday, 11/09/06. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 23 IF MfflFRMR C:'4p s"a" Smaa vim. September 19, 2006 Mr. Robert Tefft Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-07045 240 Skiff Point Dear Mr. Tefft: M CIVIL LAND PLANNING C ENVIRONMENTAL G TRANSPORTATION G In regards to the insufficiency letter dated August 31, 2006 for the above project, we offer the following responses along with revised drawings. GENERAL ENGINEERING: 1. Drainage easement along eastern property line is shown on drawings. 2. All structures have been removed from easement. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT 1. Items 1-8 are acknowledged. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF C.O. 1. Items 9-10 are acknowledged. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. Due to site constraints, a vault is necessary for retention. The required number of parking spaces is 22. Having to conform to the new parking requirements, setbacks have been requested the side and rear lot lines which has not allowed for open retention ponds. 2. The vault will be accessible through manholes located on the top of the vault. FIRE: 1. Prior to building permit issuance, fire flow calculations will be submitted. 2. Radio Signal Booster Systems will be installed prior to building permit issuance. 3. Automatic Class 1 standpipe system with Fire Pump 4. Standpipe connection for docks is located on utility plan. 5. FDC will be a minimum 15' from building face and FHA within 40'. Hydrant is not installed on the same main as fire sprinkler and a double detector check valve is shown. 6. Fire hydrant has been located on plans. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECHOMINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 SEP 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r so N -ft Mr. Robert Tefft September 19, 2006 Page Two LAND RESOURCE: 1. Tree survey is attached herewith. 2. Tree inventory plan is attached herewith. 3. Tree preservation plan will be submitted prior to building permit. LANDSCAPING: 1. See revised landscape plan showing 25% or less accent trees. 2. Landscape Plan Note #3 has been revised. 3. See revised landscape plan in regards to perimeter buffer. 4. See revised landscape plan in regards to heights of shrubs. 5. Landscape Note #8 has been revised. 6. Comp. Landscape application has been deleted. 7. Wheel stops and curbing have been added. PARKS & RECREATION 1. Impact fees acknowledged. STORMWATER: 1. See revised survey and grading/drainage plan for 50' topo. 2. SWFWMD permit will be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. SOLID WASTE: 1. Space has been provided in trash room for recycling. Since trash and recycling are on different days, the 10x10 trash staging pad will be used for both a roll-out dumpster and recycle bins. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: 1. Two parked vehicles located at the north end of eastern driveway have been eliminated. 2. Parking spaces have been reconfigured to avoid columns. 3. Painted stop bar has been located on site plan. 4. See note on drawings stating parking garage clear height will be no less than 8'2" to accommodate handicap van parking. 5. Ingress/egress has been revised. 6. Ingress/egress has been revised. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER l ?? M M Mr. Robert Teffi September 19, 2006 Page Three PLANNING: 1. All off-street parking has been screen by landscaped fence. 2. See revised site plan. 3. Ingree/egress has been revised. 4. The front building setback has been revised to 15'. 5. Site data table has been revised to reflect correct ISR. 6. See revised narrative. 7. See note on plans indicating all utilities will be placed underground. 8. See revised drawings in regards to fence around swimming pool and revised landscape plans in regards to sight visibility triangles. 9. See revised narrative. 10. See revised narrative. 11. See revised narrative. 12. See revised architectural elevations and narrative. 13. See revised architectural plans. 14. Roof plan has been included. 15. See revised elevations. 16. See revised site plan in regards to northernmost parking spaces. These have been deleted. 17. See revised site plan. 18. See revised architectural & site plan for dumpster coordination. 19. See revised narrative. 20. See revised architectural plans. 21. See revised architectural / civil plans 22. See revised architectural plans regarding mechanical screening. 12 condensing units screened on roof. 23. See revised narrative. We look forward to hearing from you positively in order for us to proceed to CDB. Sincerely, AUoVree'n A. Williams Project Director Enc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C? C?OC?Q[?? D? 509&e" sew&w' vex, Date: September 25, 2006 00 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: FLD2006-07045 - 240 Skiff Point NES Proj# 627 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 15 Response Letter 15 Comp Infill Application with Revised Narrative 15 Authorizations 15 Deeds 15 Revised Survey 15 Stormwater Report 15 Revised, Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 15 Revised Tree Inventory & Survey 15 Revised Sets (4 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, ! Signed and Sealed 15 Revised Architectural Plans Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. ORIGINAL. By: RECEIVED Ang Haines, Executive Admin. Assistant SEP 9.7 2006 Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SMITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH(c)NORTHSIDEENC.INEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 PLANNING DEPARTMENT pTER 9:20 am Case Number: FLD2006-07045 - 240 SKIFF PT Owner(s): Affordable Dental Llc 430 Jasmine Way Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Owner(s): New Horizons Properties Llc 430 Jasmine Way Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Mize And Sefair Development 1725 1/2 East 7th Avenue 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: Doreen@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.40 acres at the northwest corner of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way. Tampa, Fl 33605 TELEPHONE: 813-241-4664, FAX: 813-842-5615, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Northside Engineering Services Inc. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: IEOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: Flexible Development approval to permit I I attached dwelling units within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 56.5 feet (top of stair tower/mechanical equipment), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 11.8 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to zero feet and 5 feet, respectively as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33758 P 0 Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Island Estates Civic Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 140 Island Way TELEPHONE: 442-2237, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 5 1. Show drainage easement along the eastern property line. 2. No structures (pool deck, steps, sidewalk) shall be constructed in the drainage easement. Per the City Storm Atlas this easement contains a 36-inch diameter storm pipe. All of the above to be resolved prior to CDB. Prior to issuance of a building permit; 1. Applicant shall show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp . 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 3. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be installed at least 15-feet from the face of building. 4. Provide a note or dimension on the plan indicating that the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no further than 40-feet from the nearest Fire Hydrant Assembly (FHA). 5. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 6. Applicant shall install a cleanout at the end of the existing sewer lateral in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index # 305. 7. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main prior to issuance of a building permit. The health permit application form(s) can be found at: www.dep.state.fl.us/water/drinkingwater/forms.htm 8. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 9. A CO will not be issued until completion of the proposed water line along Skiff Point. The applicant shall contribute to the cost of the water line installation. 10. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 6 9 • 1. Underground vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only for water quantity storage if specifically approved by the City Engineer (City of Clearwater, "Storm Drainage Design Criteria" Page 7) . Provide justification for the underground vault. 2. If this vault is approved, it must be accessible for maintenance. It appears that a pool is proposed over the vault control structure and underdrain. How will it be possible to maintain this structure? Fire: I , 8/21/2006 Prior to a Building Permit being issued, fire flow calculations have to be completed. Letter dated July 27,2006 indicates that the fire flow calculations are not necessary for DRC submittal but they WILL be needed for Building Permit. 2. Radio Signal Booster System (800 MHz) required per City of Clearwater Ordinance NO.7617-06 The specifications and design of the system will be subject to approval by the City of Clearwater Radio Communications Shop or its designee and the Development and Neighborhood Services Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3 , An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Standpipe connection for dock area must be connected to firepump/wet standpipe system. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 5. FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO CDB 6. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I , The tree survey is incomplete, all trees, with their actual canopies, on and within 25' of the property must be shown on ALL plans prior to CDB. 2. Submit the Tree Inventory plan sheet showing the tree ID numbers prior to CDB. 3 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 7 • I . Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, no more than 25% of the required trees may be accent trees. As proposed, 50% of the required trees would be accent trees. 2. Landscape Plan note #3 must be revised to be consistent with the Code. Railroad ties are not an acceptable means of protection for landscape areas. 3 . Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, the perimeter landscape requirements necessitate the provision of 13 perimeter trees. As two (2) accent trees count for one (1) shade tree only eight (8) trees have been provided to meet this requirement. 4. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, at time of planting shrubs shall have a height between 18" and 24" when used in a perimeter landscape buffer and shall be planted every 36" on center. The proposed Indian Hawthorne does not meet this requirement. 5 . Landscape Plan note #8 must be revised. It is inconsistent with the Code as well as the development proposal. 6. Clarify the intent of the Comprehensive Landscape application. What requirements are intended to be modified? 7. Pursuant to Section 3-1204.D of the Community Development Code, all landscaping is to be protected from vehicular traffic by curbing and wheel stops along the perimeter of any landscaping adjoining vehicular use areas. Curbing has not been proposed at the north end of the manuvering area for the western parking tier. Parks and Recreation: Stormwater: Solid Waste: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art kader at 727-562-4824. Prior to CDB provide 50 foot of adjacent topography per section E. of the submittal form for flexible standard. This is to include the exact location of the existing 36"RCP along the east property line. No structures are allowed over this pipe including any building roof overhangs. Prior to issuance of a building permit please provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. make sure there is room for recycling bins in trash area or on complex Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 8 • • 1. Demonstrate how two parked vehicles located at north end of eastern driveway can exit the parking spaces without backing out onto the right of way. 2. Provide larger parking spaces or relocate the columns that are at the end of the parking stalls per section 3-1402.A. of the Community Development Code. 3. Mark in white paint a stop bar with the word stop for both driveways per section 3-1402.F. of the Community Development Code. 4. The vertical clear height of parking garage shall be 8' 2" to accommodate handicap van parking. Make a note of this on the site plans. 5. Community Development Code Section 3-1402.B. prohibits more than one entrance unless necessary to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. 6. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-102.D.1., driveways shall be spaced a minimum of 125-feet apart. An exception to this requirement is available in Community Development Code Section 3-102.17. if the effect would be to enhance the safety or operation of the roadway. This shall be demonstrated by a study prapared by a registered professional engineer. Describe how two driveways can alleviate congestion or improve traffic flow per section 3-1402 b. of the Community Development Code. All of the above to be addressed prior to a CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 9 9 • I . Pursuant to Section 2.404.A.4 of the Community Development Code, off-street parking shall be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet (4') in height. Screening is required along the south, east and west. 2. Pursuant to Section 2.404.A.1.b of the Community Development Code, reductions to the rear and side setbacks shall result in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. How does the location of the walkway along the east property line result in an improved design/site plan - specifically from the perspective of the adjacent property? 3 . Pursuant to Section 3.1403.13 of the Community Development Code, there shall be no more than one (1) entrance and one (1) exit or one (1) combined entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the City's Traffic Engineering Department. 4. Pursuant to Section 2.404.A.6.a of the Community Development Code, clarify how the proposed front setback (to building) will not be out of character with the neighborhood. 5. 'Pursuant to Section 2-401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR) within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District is 0.85. While the development proposal complies with this requirement at 0.69, the site data table denotes a maximum ISR of 0.95. Please correct. 6. Pursuant to Section 3.913.A.I of the Community Development Code, a response is required that states how the development proposal will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The response provided states that the development does not exceed its maximum density, exceeds parking requirements and that the building meets all setback requirements as well as discusses the height of the project in relation to previously approved projects. While these are all fine points, except for the incorrect setback reference (there is a front setback deviation to 11.8% they do not address the points of the above criterion. Provide a revised response. 7. Pursuant to Section 3.911 of the Community Development Code, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground. No proposed utilities other than water and sewer are depicted on the utility plan (C3.1) and no notation has been made regarding the disposition of any other utilities. Provide a notation on the plan regarding the undergrounding of all utilities in accordance with the above. 8. Pursuant to Section 3.904.13 of the Community Development Code, no structure or landscaping may be installed, other than a fence around a swimming pool or any other non-opaque fence not exceeding 36 inches, in the [20' sight visibility triangle located at the corners of the property abutting the water]. The site and landscape plans depict ten-foot sight visibility triangles at the property corners abutting the water. Further, the landscape plan depicts substantial landscaping within the northwest corner in conflict with the above. 9. Pursuant to Section 2.4041.7 of the Community Development Code, a response is required stating how a reduced setback and an increased height are justifiable based upon how this setback and height benefit the community character and immediate vicinity. The response provided requires some correction. First, as a Residential Infill project there are no minimum lot width standards; thus a reduction is not necessary. Second, the response states you are requesting a reduction to height, which is obviously not the case. Finally, the response states that the deviations are consistent with those previously approved developments to the west, which is not entirely accurate as the subject proposal requests greater and/or more substantial deviations to the front and side setbacks that those developments did. In addition to the above, the response needs to indicate how the required deviations are a benefit to the community character and immediate vicinity. 10. Pursuant to Section 3.913.A.6 of the Community Development Code, the response provided is to address how the development proposal minimizes visual, acoustic, and olfactory impacts on adjacent properties; however the response states that there will be impacts. While this is clearly a typographical error, the response must state how the development has been designed to mitigate any such impacts on adjacent properties. 11 . Pursuant to Section 2.404.17.6 of the Community Development Code, a response is required to be provided that states how, through the design of the project, a form and function is created which enhances the community character of the vicinity. The reponse provided is not all to clear as to how the building lines, heights and landscaping of the project create the form/function that enhances the area. Some consideration may also want to be given in the response in regard to the architectural style of the building as it is quite different from any building in the area, and how that might enhance the community character. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 10 9 12. Pursuant to Section 8-102 of the Community Development Code, elevator equipment rooms and like mechancial equipment enclousures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher that the maximum height otherwise specified for the zoning district. Please be advised that no provision exists for the projection of stair towers above the maximum height; therefore the height of the building must be measured to the top of such stair towers (56.5'). Please revise all applicable applications, site data and written responses. 13. Provide black/white line drawings for the building elevations. 14. Provide a roof plan. 15. For clarification, depict the elevations in question on a "key plan" for each of the four (4) elevations. 16. How will the two (2) northernmost parking spaces within the eastern parking tier achieve egress from the site? Vehicles are not permitted to back-out into rights-of-way [ref.: 3-1402.C]. 17. With regard to those parking spaces referenced above, the plan depicts a planter projecting approximately six feet (6) into the front of the parking spaces. Please clarify. 18. The architectural site plan [page 2] depicts a dumpster enclosure at the southeast corner of the property and not the trash staging area as depicted on the civil plans. Please clarify and revise the plans to be consistent with one another. 19. Pursuant to Section 2.404.F.5 of the Community Development Code, provide a response that states how developing the parcel as a residential infill project upgrade the immediate vicinity. The response provided does not address how the development of the parcel as a Residential Infill project (and per those criteria) will result in an upgrade to the immediate vicinity. 20. The architectural site plan [page 2] does not depict any of the walkways or swimming pool deck depicted on the civil plans. Revise the plans to be consistent with one another. 21 . The architectural site plan [page 2] depicts a ground level wall at the southwest corner of the eastern parking tier. The structure is not depicted on the civil plans and it is unclear as to whether the structure is depicted on the elevations. Revise the plans to be consistent with one another. 22. Depict the locations of all mechanical equipment and the means by which they are to be screened. 23. Pursuant to Section 2.404.F.1 of the Community Development Code, clarify how the deviation to the buildings front setback is warrented. How is designing the building to meet the required front setback impractical? Also, the response provided does not address the walkway along the east property line that connects the pool deck to the Skiff Point sidewalk. Other: No Comments Notes: A determination of sufficiency cannot be made for this development proposal at this time. In order to be scheduled for the DRC meeting of November 2, 2006, please submit 15 sets of revised plans addressing these comments by Noon, Monday, October 2, 2006. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Page 11 0 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT OPFxa: Box 4748, CLEARWATI?R, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SIiRVICI?S BUILDING, 100 SOU77i MYR77.I? AVIiNUI?, CLGARWAII[Lt, FLOLtIDA 33756 TI:L.r:IIHONI: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RFVII?W August 7, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: FLD2006-07045 (240-250 Skiff Point) - Letter of Completeness Dear Ms. Williams: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-07045. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, August 31, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefftAmyclea»vater.com Fk\nn I In K"[), \4;?lna JOIIN DORAN, COI XCHAIit,MIU.,i; i Icwr I I:??nLrc ?x, Cc?rNai.?ut?u+F:r u?.? A. I'rn;rsr:N• Cc?c?NC:u_?ut>u?er, 13n.i. JONU,N, CrA M-11.wtw+er ® CAI, lic n;nl. 1:,\I11i ,MalF:N I AM) ?FFir.?c:? rn I: Ac, nc l? 1??IPi.0) 1:1,, E CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 • Clearwater U FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: August 7, 2006 To: Doreen Williams, Northside Engineering, (727) 446-8036 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-07045 240-250 Skiff Point Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tef a, myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** Aug. 07 2006 03:01PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Aug.07 03:00PM 01'08 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1--HELP-FAX C435-7329). za)uum?od August 1, 2006 Mr. Robert Tefft Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-07045 - 240 Skiff Point - Letter of Completeness Mako / NES 627 Dear Mr. Tefft: CIVIL O LAND PLANNING O ENVIRONMENTAL0 TRANSPORTATION O Please find listed below responses to the letter of incompleteness dated July 28, 2006. 1. See Sheet C2.1 for dimensions. 2. See Revised L1.1 for adjacent trees. 3. See revised architectural elevations. While not completeness items, below are responses to the other issues identified: 1. Narrative has been revised. 2. Narrative has been revised. 3. See revised Sheet C2.1. This should satisfy the incompleteness of the above project. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to call. Sincerely, m'? A"oreen A. i hams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0'7 2006 PLANNING DEFAI' ° =o° x, Nil CITY OF CLEAR"WAlEiE Norths4de Date: August 7, 2006 0 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: 240 Skiff Point / FLD2006-07045 NES Proj# 627 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk pies Description 1 F Response Letter 5 Revised Narrative Page 1 15 Revised Sheet C2.1, Signed and Sealed 15 Revised Sheet L1.1 Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: gel i s, E e Admin. Assistant Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams ORIGWAL RECEIVED 0,1 07 2006 PLANNING CITY OF CLEARWM ERT 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH(q)NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 • • C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy C?rrlcr Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FI.omDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES 13(JILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTui AVENUE, CLEARWATER, PLoml)A 33756 '1 FLITHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENP REVIEW July 28, 2006 Mr. House Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: FLD2006-07045 - 240 Skiff Point - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Ghovaee: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-07045. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: J 1. Pursuant to Section G of the Residential Infill Project application, the site plan is to include all dimensions, and all required setbacks. The required setbacks have not been depicted, and a dimension from the northeast corner of the building to the east property line needs to be provided. J 2. Pursuant to Section H of the Residential Infill Project application, the landscape plan shall depict the existing trees immediately adjacent to the site. 3. Pursuant to Section I of the Residential Infill Project application, the building elevation drawings shall include the dimensions and materials. The dimensions of the building have been provided to the roof deck; however the dimensions from the roof deck to the mechancial equipment (?) atop the roof deck needs to be provided. While many materials have been denoted on the elevations, it seems as if not all of the materials are denoted - there would seem to be more building colors on the plans. Also, in order to reduce/eliminate any confusion, indicate where the materials are proposed on the building. While not completeness items, the following other issues were identified: -f ? The description of request does not include a request for deviation to the front setback. J? The description of request includes a deviation request to 55 for the side (west) setback; however this should be a deviation to 5.0'. /o The civil plans depict two (2) additional support columns than do the architectural plans. These columns are located on the north side of the parking area and appear to support nothing. Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be 1 r.\nh liim.un, ib1AN.(w, ?unN I)(trnN, C(n N(:n_ n:w,i;R I1(,Yf I kN111:1 ()X, Cot Ncu. u(>usr:R I3ui.J(,N (,N, C(n uai.wt ntri; ® CARLEN A. PI:IFKSP.N, CAWNUI_NIFNIBIT' "F(WAi. FMI M, FN I AND Afr•m:?t:? rivet A(:'rt()N F.,NtP1.0) ER" • C taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, August 7, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert. to f igmyclearwater. com 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER L PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: July 28, 2006 To: Housh / Doreen, Northside Engineering Services, Inc., (727) 446-8036 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner II Re: FLD2006-07045 1240-250 Skiff Point (Mako) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te ft(a?myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nsyclearwater.coni ** 0 r Jul. 28 2006 03:50PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Jul.28 03:48PM 01'23 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVA14TA[E ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). NorthSPde sviw f?,t6? SilJtt &W, Sex. Date: July 28, 2006 40 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Sherry Watkins, Admin. Analyst .City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: 240 & 250 Skiff Point NES Proj# 627 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 1 Check #1774 for $1,205 15 Comp Infill Application 15 Letter of Authorization 15 Warranty Deed 2) 15 Survey 15 Stormwater Report, 1 Signed and Sealed 15 Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 15 Sets (4 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, 1 Signed and Sealed 15 Comp Landscape Application 15 Tree Inventory and Report 15 Architectural Plans, 11 x 17 Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: An4a aines, Executive Admin. Assistant Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTHSIDEENCINEERIN6.COlM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 28 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • From: 95624257 Page: 313 9 Date: 11512007 2:39:31 PM 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER Posr OFFICE Banc 4748, CLEARWA-mR, FLoRIDA 337584748 CrIY HALL, 112 So= OscaoLA Avarua, CMARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 MumoNE (727) 562-4050 FAx (727) 562-4052 Cm CouNcn. December 27, 2006 Danny Williams 228 Skiff Point Clearwater, FL 33755 Dear Mr. Williams: 'Thank you for your December 140 letter. I appreciate your comrnernts regarding the development activity on Island Estates. I am aware of the issues of neighborhood concern resulting from previous similar development approvals. Gay staff assures me that each development proposal is reviewed iii accordance with the GommunityDevelopment Code provisions. While it is true that the Community Development Code allows for a good deal of flesbility, such latitude is not without limitation. Regarding the specific item to which you are referring, staff has advised that the request continues to undergo review and a final recommendation remains to be made. Staff has indicated that some changes to their initial review are possible. I would encourage you to contact Planning Director Michael Dells directly regarding the status of this project. He may be reached at 562-4561. As this matter will ultimately come before the City's Community Development Board, you are encouraged to follow and participate in the process by attending and providing input during the public hearing that will be held. Mr. Delk will be happy to assist you with regard to how you may familiarize yourself with the details of the project and how you may participate at the hearing Sincerely, Frank V. I?ibbard Mayor Cc: City Council William B. Horne II, City Manager Nfichael Delk, Planning Director FRANK HmBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNQIMEMMR J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCHMEMBER Bim JONsoN, COUNcium BbR - CARm A PE XnM, COUNCOMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPIAYEC This fax was received by GFi FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http:/Avww.gfi.com From: 95624257 Page: 113 Date: 115/2007 2:39:30 PM 7®; ;Nl. ?c.rc ,zfiy/zvo I 1, c lo 7- im/ iN Fla i-ed ' v? OASZ 7-/, /9 -AJ- ?16t Aftd -44 AO'COO, Pr"'O ? ?I w ilI Gle %nl h A?? J?ev ?d A7 SunJ, ou.?e ?'G'v?9 ? -1 PGu1 ?/? ? ? J j s - /?? ,goy" 1 2,11 Oct 0Ate This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http:ffNww.gfii.com From: 95624257 Page: 2/3 Date: 11512007 2:39:30 PM a T 7** 14tA??Ial oF 1,11 _ D 1r .. D YAUV )fte afill;7 vfWA/ /IIo/?%? 10 7;?9- h?elnol) Zvi i,?r n?z A?? ?llr? 6/.rX oN COPIES TO CITY COUNCIL DEC 18 M PRESS N' cpWATTORNEv 4/1 fl XA r s,Glf /7 ,,-,2V C F11) - To /' ? 5,?' L//9- 5 / 9°S In ? ?.tl?v D ert?c for M- a-ZOA *awe. cc a? coma Dm Dft /A4,/a 7/0 6 This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http:/Avww.gfi.com I (? DEC 1 90 2005 U L?U L? ?DEVELOPMENT SERV'?' C'°"I CLEARb'!?. T0: Community Development Board C? December 17, 2006 RE: Proposed project at 240-250 Skiff Point While the proposed building variances would seem to over-power the lot size, one concern is parking availability and what provision has been made for that? How far will the setback be from our lot line on the east of the proposed structure? It would seem that it would be rather close. Ns?ly? ?tL? Robert D. Mevig 270 Skiff Point A-1 Clearwater, FL 7v- • 5 Vic A It aAV /I jWoe ,ale o o /' po lwl2ly Gu.r ? 11 jN p? Y7k /0, d? 1 x s o h ? f? s 1?f 'o f 2-11 i 6er kof,04 All ;`JbbL4LJ/ L A/ o .re 172W .1W Ila COPIES TO CITY COUNCIL DEC 18 2006 PRESS ARK/.ATTQRNEI" alfRice V, 71 Z, e 2,,2,1 SAfl= Ap"W 0 1wc jvkav2 F11), Please prepare a response for L)E?.BYo..-. signature. CG aty Connca Due Date: 7/ o 16 .F ? LL B • • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° le, } 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE C arwater CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: December 20, 2006 Doreen Williams, Northside Engineering, (727) 446-8036 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2006-07045 (240-250 Skiff Point) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 4 Comments: Doreen: We have received two additional letters of objection in regard to 240-250 Skiff Point. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tef t a,nayclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.niyClearwater.coni ** Dec. 20 2006 11:57AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Dec.20 11:56AM 01'36 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HB_P-FAX (435-7329). 0 Bruce T. Hintz 270 Skiff Point Clearwater, FL 33767 City of Clearwater, Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Dear Sir, C? December 17, 2006 I am in receipt of the request for a variance for a proposed 11 unit building at 240 and 250 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5-A Lots 40-41. As an owner of ten years and resident of 270 Skiff Point, and also the President of the 10 unit, two story condominium building which abuts the east property line of the property requesting the approval for the change, I and the other residents of this building would be experience direct negative impact if this change was approved. Currently there are two , one-story, structures with three apartments on the 240 and 250 Skiff Point property. In the 270 Skiff Point Condominium Building, two apartments each have five windows that line the west side of the building facing the proposed building. Additionally all of the residents of 270 Skiff Point have windows that line the north side of the building facing the water. Construction of the proposed building would significantly reduce the light and views from the building to the west. The request is to allow a reduction in the from the west setback from 10 feet to 5 feet. This would encroach into the space between the adjacent properties. Additionally the rear setback would be reduced from 15 feet to zero feet. This would obstruct the views of the water from adjacent properties. The front setback would be reduced from 25 feet to 15.3 feet. This would be much more visible on the street and would be significantly closer to the curb than any of the adjacent structures. In addition to the above requested changes, an increase from 30 feet to 46.2 feet in building height with an additional 10.3 feet for mechanical enclosures is requested. This would result in structure that is between 46 to 56 feet tall, Which is approx 4 to 5 stories tall. This is significantly taller than any of the adjacent structures in the vicinity of this property and out of character for this street. • • -2- Given the requested variances, the proposed building would negatively affect the value of 270 Skiff Point and the adjacent properties to the East, West, and South. Therefore, as a good next door neighbor of this property for over 10 years, respectfully request that the variances proposed for 240 and 250 Skiff Point be denied. Sincerely. ce T. Resident of 270 Skiff Pt /President of the Sea Island Condominium Assoc. 0 0 Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: qLq 69 Phone: FROM: Phone: DATE: tS(m 10 0 SUBJECT: ZJy11 '?'50 `5aar- 'R, MESSAGE: hO? 1. i'l (Z= Gt% Gf ?iTto?-1 b/?? r,- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ?' Dec. 19 2006 05:34PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Dec.19 05:32PM 01'20 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800- ELP-FAX C435-7329). CDB Meeting Date: February 20, 2007 Case Number: FLD2006-07045 Agenda Item: D. 2. Owners: New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC Applicant: Mize and Sefair Development Agent: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Addresses: 240 and 250 Skiff Point CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under. the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential High (RH) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached Dwellings Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings EXISTING North: Preservation (P) District Clearwater Harbor SURROUNDING ZONING South: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings. AND USES: East: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings West: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings UPDATE: The development proposal was originally scheduled for the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting of December 19, 2006; however was rescheduled to the Board's meeting of January 16, 2007 due to an error in the public notice/advertisement, which excluded a deviation to the east (side) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet (to building). Subsequent to this continuance being granted, staff had discussions with the applicant regarding the requested deviation to the rear setback (to pavement) and asked that attempts be made to accommodate Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 1 9 • those parking spaces at the rear of the property within the required setback. The applicant requested and was granted by the Board an additional continuance to the meeting of February 20, 2007 in order to accomplish this. The revised plans submitted by the applicant have not only accommodated these off-street parking spaces within the required rear setback, but also have modified the location of the swimming pool equipment enclosure along the east side of the building so that it also meets setbacks; thus eliminating the deviation that originally required the proposal to be continued from the Board's meeting of December 19, 2006. The revised plans have also increased the front building setback from 15.3 feet, as originally proposed, to 18.3 feet. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.39-acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way and is comprised of two separate parcels, both of which are occupied by a triplex with associated back-out parking. The property is zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD). It is noted that while the subject property is located within the IENCOD, all of the development standards and criteria of the MHDR zoning district apply. Development Proposal: The development proposal includes of the demolition of the existing improvements on site (including the elimination of non-conforming back-out parking) and the construction of 11 attached dwellings within a 46.2-foot high (to top of roof deck) building over associated off-street parking and amenities. The architecture of the proposed building is different from any other style presently found in the vicinity. The architect has classified the style of the building as Miami Vernacular, and where the majority of the buildings in the vicinity have a "square box look"; the proposed building has "unusual lines, balconies and mixed roof heights to aesthetically hide mechanical equipment". The applicant and architect believe that the proposed architectural style will be a vibrant new addition to the neighborhood. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code is discussed below. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum I.S.R. within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use category is 0.85. As proposed, the development will have an I.S.R. of 0.69 and therefore meets the above requirement. Density: Pursuant to Section 2-401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum density within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use category is 30 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the 0.39- acre subject property is permitted a maximum of 11 dwelling units, which is consistent with the proposed development. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2404 of the Community Development Code, the development standards set forth for residential infill projects are guidelines that may be varied based upon the flexibility criteria specified for residential infill projects. The development standards set forth in Section 2-404 call for a front setback of 10-25 feet, a side setback of 0-10 feet, and a rear setback of 0-15 feet. The development proposal requests a reduced front (south) setback of 18.3 feet (to building) and 0 feet (to pavement); a reduced rear (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement); a reduced side (east/west) setbacks of five feet (to pavement). With regard to the proposed building, the required rear and side setbacks will be met with only a deviation to the front setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet being requested. This reduction is supportable Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 2 • • based upon the proposed landscaping which will mitigate the reduction and buffer the adjacent uses, thereby adhering to neighborhood character. With regard to the various requested setback reductions to pavement, it is noted that the reduction to the front (south) setback to 0 feet is supportable as the deviation is for the trash staging area, which function dictates that it be located adjacent to the property/right-of-way line. The reduction to the rear (north) setback to 0 feet will accommodate a portion of the deck surrounding the swimming pool. The reduction of the side (east) setback to 5 feet will accommodate a required egress walkway and a portion of the deck surrounding the swimming pool, while the similar reduction to the side (west) setback will aid in the accommodation of off-street parking. The rear and side setback reductions will not impact the ability to provide required perimeter landscaping, and by reducing these setbacks accordingly, the development is able to provide a greater front setback, which it more visible and beneficial to the surrounding area. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-404 of the Community Development Code, within the MHDR District the maximum building height for residential infill projects is 30 feet. However, the development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based upon the criteria specified in Section 2-4041 [ref.: Table 2-404, footnote #3]. It is also noted that within the MHDR District the maximum building height for attached dwellings is 50 feet. The building is proposed with a height of 46.2 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet above for a mechanical equipment enclosure. Based upon the above, while the development proposal meets the applicable development standard for attached dwellings, the development proposal requires a deviation to height as it is being processed as a residential infill project. The flexibility criteria for residential infill projects states that flexibility in regard to height shall be justifiable based upon the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed redevelopment will be more aesthetically appealing than what presently exists on site and will benefit the immediate vicinity and City in that respect. Pursuant to Section 8-102, elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height otherwise specified for the zoning district assigned to the property. The proposed mechanical equipment enclosure projects 10.3 feet above the roof deck, which is within the above referenced parameters. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the flexibility criteria for residential inflll projects as they most closely pertain to increases in building height. The development proposal is also compatible with existing and proposed development in the vicinity; therefore the requested increase to height to 46.2 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure can be supported. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Section 2404 of the Community Development Code, within the MHDR District off-street parking is required to be provided at a rate of 2.0 parking spaces per attached dwelling unit. Therefore, the proposed 11 attached dwellings require 22 off-street parking spaces. As proposed, 22 off-street parking spaces will exist; thus the development proposal meets its parking requirement. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.13.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The development proposal includes a refuse enclosure within the building; thus it will be screened in keeping with the Code. Mechanical equipment associated with the development is proposed to be located on the roof within a 3.2-foot high opaque acrylic/aluminum enclosure, which will screen the equipment from view of abutting properties and public streets. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 3 • • Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, where attached dwellings will abut other attached dwellings, a 10-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer with trees 35 feet on center is required. The development proposal (attached dwellings) will abut existing attached dwellings on both its eastern and western perimeters; however buffers of only 5 feet in width have been proposed. As such, the applicant has requested the approval of a Comprehensive Landscape Program with reductions to the eastern and western perimeter landscape buffers as noted above. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X) proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The development proposal will be consistent with this criterion provided that the attached conditions of approval, as discussed below, are met. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping along the eastern and western perimeter is still accommodated despite the reduced buffer, and through their reduction enables a southern buffer width that is greater than required. However, it is noted that the overall number of required perimeter trees, pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, is not being met. The development requires a total of 13 trees along the perimeter and only 11 have been proposed (two accent trees or three palms are equivalent to one shade tree). In addition to the above, pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.1 of the Community Development Code, no more than 25% of the required trees on-site may be accent trees and approximately 75% of the trees proposed are accent trees. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department that meets the perimeter tree requirement while having no more than 25% of the total required trees as accent trees. Based upon the Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 4 • • above and subject to the attached condition being addressed, positive findings can be made with regard to the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program. It is noted that pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.1 of the Community Development Code, shrubs used as part of a perimeter buffer shall have a height of 18 inches - 24 inches at time of planting. The Indian Hawthorne is proposed at a height of 14 inches; thus it has been attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan must be revised so that at time of planting the proposed Indian Hawthorne has a height of 18 inches - 24 inches. Additionally, pursuant to Section 3-1204.D. of the Community Development Code, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular traffic by the installation of curbing and/or wheel stops. The proposed civil and landscape plans do not depict the provision of curbing at all locations where vehicular traffic abuts landscaping; thus it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, the civil and landscape plans must be revised to depict all of the required curbing separating landscaping from vehicular traffic. Signaae: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Island Estates Neighborhood Plan: The Island Estates Neighborhood Plan identifies various goals and objectives in an effort to emphasize strengths and minimize weaknesses in the neighborhood. These goals and objectives have been reviewed, and the following are noted: Objective 3.a.: Install sidewalks and bike paths where they do not exist. While a sidewalk already exists adjacent to the subject property, the existing back-out parking on Skiff Point may often obstruct this sidewalk. As the development proposal includes the elimination of the existing back-out parking, the intent of this objective (to have functional sidewalks) will be furthered through the development proposal. Objective 41: Promote the screening of all mechanical equipment, dumpsters and trash containers from public rights-of-way, adjacent property and the waterfront. As discussed previously, the development proposal includes a refuse enclosure within the building and locates associated mechanical equipment on the roof within a 3.2-foot high opaque acrylic/aluminum enclosure, which will screen the equipment from view of abutting properties and public streets. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this objective. Objective 5.e.: Development and redevelopment must be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. As concluded through this review, as well as a review of Section 2- 1602.H of the Community Development Code, the development proposal is found to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan. Based upon the above, the development proposal has been found to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 5 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404 of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent I.S.R. 0.85 0.69 X Density 30 dwelling units per acre 27.54 dwelling units per acre X Minimum Front: 10-25 feet South: 18.3 feet (to building) X1 Setbacks 0 feet (to pavement) Side: 0-10 feet East: 16 feet (to building) X1 5 feet (to pavement) West: 10 feet (to building) X' 5 feet (to pavement) Rear: 0-15 feet North: 21.7 feet (to building) X1 0 feet (to pavement) Maximum 30 feet 46.2 feet X2 Building Height Off-Street Attached Dwellings - 2.0 spaces per 22 parking spaces X Parkin unit 22 spaces) 1 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 2 See above discussion with regard to Maximum Building Height. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.A of the Community Development Code (Attached Dwellings): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any X building by emergency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more X efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in X excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a X parcel of land that is designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the Zoning Atlas. 3. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land that is X designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the Zoning Atlas. 4. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street X by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 5. All waste disposal containers which serve the proposed attached dwellings use are X located within a landscaped enclosed structure. 6. Front Setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed X with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been X constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way. c. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property X values. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 6 • • The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.F of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the additional development standards for multi-family areas zoned MBDR/IENCOD as per Section 2-1602.H of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Parking. The parking of any type of vehicle, trailer, boat, personal watercraft, X recreational vehicle, or any other similar vehicle shall be prohibited on grass or any other landscaped area. 2. Fences: a. Fences shall not exceed six feet in height between any portion of the principal X structure and any side lot line. b. All fences between the rear building setback line and the seawall shall be non- X opaque (see-through). 3. Landscape Requirements. Use of gravel, stones, cinders and other similar material X in any yard shall be prohibited unless included as an integral, but minor, element of a landscaping plan. 4. Outdoor Storage. The storage of commercial fishing and crabbing equipment shall X be prohibited outdoors on any residential property. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 7 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of November 2, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.39-acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way; 2. That the property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District of the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD); 3. That the property is located within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.A of the Community Development Code (Attached Dwellings); 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project); 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-1602.11 of the Community Development Code and with the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD); 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 8 s • Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department that meets the perimeter tree requirement while having no more than 25% of the total required trees as accent trees; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department stating that at time of planting the proposed Indian Hawthorne has a height of 18 inches - 24 inches; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the civil and landscape plans must be revised to depict all of the required curbing and/or wheel stops separating landscaping from vehicular traffic; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the architectural plans are revised to be consistent with the civil plans with regard to the depiction of the north parking tier; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the civil plans are revised to be consistent with the architectural plans with regard to the depiction of balcony projections; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit must be provided; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree preservation plan that has been prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture must be provided; 8. That all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site; 9. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 10. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 11. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 12. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 13. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 9 14. That any/all boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use of the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 15. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by February 20, 2008); and 16. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner ftl ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Future Land Use Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBISkii fPt 240-250 - Mako (MHDR-IEOD) - 02-20-07(RT)ISkii f Pt 240-250 -Staff Report 02-20-07.doc Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 10 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft&mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. • Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community.Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 11 0 0 P, P -F U?uu I/ MANGO ST goPoa? IRIS p ?t ASTER ACACIA ST ST SOMERSET o cusRw ° ° p IDLENALD I I ?.GE PN? IJ ROYAL AY HEIWOm ? O SAY U AMON O RFO Jurae .- o ? PROJECT E ANADE BAY PAM SITE F1 ROOYAIYAY 3- W P(Zk' MYNONT ST SAM O ?@L? f D 4 SS y9 ? ?A ?e R! PAPAY4 ST ?'Y POM'T O p55y 9 {G/? Q 4J ? s g nORY PASSAGE ? D ` 0 %b0 O teueawar SW o WINDWARD P SAGE ° FIRST ST ° g J ' oF?? ST DR a? rc ? 9 T i a R,WT W ATER DR _ PF7N 6T MYSIDE Location Map Owners: New Horizons Properties LLC and Affordable Case: FLD2006-07045 Dental LLC Site: 240 - 250 Skiff Point Property 0.40 Size Acres : Atlas 267B Page: PIN: 08-29-15-43398-000-0400 08-29-15-43398-000-0410 W-eo i !+ •? 4 A? ? _ r al l46 , . . V 1 1 ' ? ? ,rte It \ 4% 7!.' / ? Y' 4 Aerial Map Owners: New Horizons Properties LLC and Affordable Case: FLD2006-07045 Dental LLC Site: 240 - 250 Skiff Point Property 0.40 Size Acres : Atlas 267B Page: PIN: 08-29-15-43398-000-0400 08-29-15-43398-000-0410 • 53 109 21 20 w o LiV 19 o 240 A 17 s 18 $ s 13 14 75 16 c LM i N pP _ 47 200 N R " 11 C, -0 PALM IS SW 460 48 WA TER 10 p 3 459 49 N I rv 50 N 9 450 4 9 8 7 6 5 9 2 RU' 441 w.M. 440 a39 1 +d0 4492 439 440 WATER ,8o 431 429 36 N 40 41 S ?O N G 35 4215 $ Zq1 ro w 8 42, 17 a2 34 N 41gpff, -- 4 4 33 0 -- 414 M 413 - 'pH WATER -qp9 -- ; 401 o ; 333 17 , 6 18 5 ti N t a #101 #112 32 22 Y PHASE 1 R ? ' 3a2 '4 oY ti? RH' N rn N #301 Future Land Use Map Owners: New Horizons Properties LLC and Affordable Case: FLD2006-07045 Dental LLC Site: 240 - 250 Skiff Point Property 0.40 Size Acres : Atlas 2676 Page: PIN: 08-29-15-43398-000-0400 08-29-15-43398-000-0410 53 109 21 ^. v c 40 ' 18 1 20 O o 9 s SE ? 14 15 16 13 o M I p ?•, 47 (Z , ALM 1S S460 48 3 459 60 49 4 7 6 5 450 9 44 2 61 440 1 ?00 4492 P 440 439 100 KT 1?l l` ?l l? 431 38 40 41 N 429 q O 35 4275 1 h „ 423 17 421 34 419 412 33 14 W 413 409 i 1 401 1 1 \ 1 1 333 17 18 ry ? 1 6 5 1 4 3 g101Lll ` ,1 22 2 PHASE N 2 N1{??1 34 N NCO. N ' g3O1 Zoning Map Owners: New Horizons Properties LLC and Affordable Case: FLD2006-07045 Dental LLC Site: 240 - 250 Skiff Point Property 0.40 Size Acres : Atlas 267B Page: PIN: 08-29-15-43398-000-0400 08-29-15-43398-000-0410 • 53 109 21 20 to , 19 No Ch d4 15 ,s ,7 16 o M'S SE li a 47 PALM IS SW 450 ztacd,8 - (it 459 D ellin „ R 3 444 N 50 49 ,4 6 5 450 -? 7 bag T 2 51 441 W' 440 9 1 44A 440 439 i0o 431 429 36 40 N 4, 2 ty 3 S •hed `? 35D?ve 'ngs SOO PT 427 423 N h b g 421 17 9 34 N 41 33 Attached 417 ? & 3 Dwellings 414 409 i 401 70 i O i 333 4 17 1 8 N 5 tta ry 18 + 4 #1aRetail $nfes nd 32 ry ryry 1 22 2 PRkSE Services Dwellin ry ry N 1 f.?q N ?01 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owners: New Horizons Properties LLC and Affordable Case: FLD2006-07045 Dental LLC Site: 240 - 250 Skiff Point Property 0.40 Size Acres : Atlas 267B Page: PIN: 08-29-15-43398-000-0400 08-29-15-43398-000-0410 klktl- Looking northward toward subject property from south side of Skiff Point Me q All ?, eg Looking south from subject property across Skiff Point . - -f ' Looking west toward surrounding properties from south side of Skiff Point 240-250 Skiff Point FLD2006-07045 i st Looking southeast from subject property across Skift'Point propert} Looking north toward subject property from south side of Skiff Point 4 . • CDB Meeting Date: January 16, 2007 Case Number: FLD2006-07045 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owners: New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC Applicant: Mize and Sefair Development Agent: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Addresses: 240 and 250 Skiff Point CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential High (RH) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached Dwellings Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings EXISTING North: Preservation (P) District Clearwater Harbor SURROUNDING ZONING South: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings AND USES: East: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings West: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings UPDATE: The development proposal was originally scheduled for the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting of December 19, 2006; however was rescheduled to the Board's meeting of January 16, 2007 due to an error in the public notice/advertisement, which excluded a deviation to the east (side) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet (to building). Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 1 • 0 Subsequent to this continuance, staff had discussions with the applicant regarding the requested deviation to the rear setback (to pavement) and asked that attempts be made to accommodate those parking spaces at the rear of the property within the required setback. As such, the applicant is now requesting an additional continuance to the Board's meeting of February 20, 2007. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ??? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases) Up for the next CDMSkiJfPt 240-250 - Mako (MHDR-IEOD) - 01-16-07(RT)Mi f Pt 240-250 - Staff Report 01-16-07 - Continuance.doc Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 2 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 0 Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-07045- Page 3 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: December 19, 2006 ** REVISED ** Case Number: FLD2006-07045 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owners: New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC Applicant: Mize and Sefair Development Agent: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Addresses: 240 and 250 Skiff Point CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 1.5 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 24041 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential High (RH) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached Dwellings Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings EXISTING North: Preservation (P) District Clearwater Harbor SURROUNDING ZONING South: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings AND USES: East: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings West: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings UPDATE: As result of an advertising error, the development proposal must be postponed from the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting of December 19, 2006 unit the meeting of January 16, 2007. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBISkiffPt 240-250 - Mako (MHDR-IEOD) - 12-19-06(RT)ISkiff Pt 240-250 -Staff Report 12-19-06 - Continuance.doc Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 1 0 CDB Meeting Date: December 19, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-07045 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owners: New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC Applicant: Mize and Sefair Development Agent: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Addresses: 240 and 250 Skiff Point CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential High (RH) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached Dwellings Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings EXISTING North: Preservation (P) District Clearwater Harbor SURROUNDING ZONING South: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings AND USES: East: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings West: MHDR / IENCOD Attached Dwellings ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.39-acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way and is comprised of two separate parcels, both of which are occupied by a triplex with associated back-out parking. The property is zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD). It is noted that while the subject property is located within the IENCOD, all of the development standards and criteria of the MHDR zoning district apply. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 1 0 Development Proposal: The development proposal includes of the demolition of the existing improvements on site (including the elimination of non-conforming back-out parking) and the construction of 11 attached dwellings within a 46.2-foot high (to top of roof deck) building over associated off-street parking and amenities. The architecture of the proposed building is different from any other style presently found in the vicinity. The architect has classified the style of the building as Miami Vernacular, and where the majority of the buildings in the vicinity have a "square box look"; the proposed building has "unusual lines, balconies and mixed roof heights to aesthetically hide mechanical equipment". The applicant and architect believe that the proposed architectural style will be a vibrant new addition to the neighborhood. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code is discussed below. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2-401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum I.S.R. within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use category is 0.85. As proposed, the development will have an I.S.R. of 0.69 and therefore meets the above requirement. Density: Pursuant to Section 2-401.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum density within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use category is 30 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the 0.39- acre subject property is permitted a maximum of 11 dwelling units, which is consistent with the proposed development. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-404 of the Community Development Code, residential infill projects shall have a front setback of 10-25 feet, a side setback of 0-10 feet, and a rear setback of 0-15 feet. As part of the development proposal deviations have been requested to reduce the front (south) setback to 15.3 feet (to building) and 0 feet (to pavement); to reduce the rear (north) setback to 0 feet (to pavement); and to reduce the side (east/west) setbacks to 5 feet (to pavement). With regard to the proposed building, the required rear and side setbacks will be met, and only a deviation to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15.3 feet is being requested. This reduction is supportable based upon the proposed landscaping which will mitigate the reduction and buffer the adjacent uses, thereby adhering to neighborhood character. In addition to the above, the Community Development Board (CDB) has previously approved two development proposals on nearby properties that included reductions to the front setback to 15 feet (on June 21, 2005, an approval was given for attached dwellings at 200-201 Skiff Point; and on October 18, 2005, an approval was given for attached dwellings at 211-221 Skiff Point). With regard to the various requested setback reductions to pavement, it is noted that the reduction to the front (south) setback to 0 feet is supportable as the deviation is for the trash staging area, which function dictates that it be located adjacent to the property/right-of-way line. The reduction to the rear (north) setback to 0 feet will aid in the accommodation of six (6) parking spaces and a portion of the deck surrounding the swimming pool. The reduction of the side (east) setback to 5 feet will accommodate a required egress walkway and a portion of the deck surrounding the swimming pool, while the similar reduction to the side (west) setback will aid in the accommodation of off-street parking. The rear and side setback reductions will not impact the ability to provide required perimeter landscaping, and by reducing these setbacks accordingly, the development is able to provide a greater front setback, which it more visible and beneficial to the surrounding area. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-404 of the Community Development Code, within the MHDR District the maximum building height for residential infill projects is 30 feet. However, the development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based upon the criteria specified in Section 2-404.F [ref.: Table 2-404, footnote #3]. It is also noted that within the Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 2 • 0 MHDR District the maximum building height for attached dwellings is 50 feet. The building is proposed with a height of 46.2 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet above for a mechanical equipment enclosure. Thus, the development proposal requires a deviation to height based upon the above. The flexibility criteria for residential infill projects states that flexibility in regard to height shall be justifiable based upon the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed redevelopment will be more aesthetically appealing than what presently exists on site and will benefit the immediate vicinity and City in that respect. In addition to the above, the Community Development Board (CDB) has previously approved two development proposals on nearby properties that included increases to height. On June 21, 2005, an approval was given for attached dwellings at 200-201 Skiff Point with an increase to height to 49 feet (to roof deck); and on October 18, 2005, an approval was given for attached dwellings at 211-221 Skiff Point with an increase to height to 47 feet (to roof deck). Pursuant to Section 8-102, elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height otherwise specified for the zoning district assigned to the property. The proposed mechanical equipment enclosure projects 10.3 feet above the roof deck, which is within the above referenced parameters. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the flexibility criteria for residential infill projects as they most closely pertain to increases in building height. The development proposal is also compatible with existing and proposed development in the vicinity; therefore the requested increase to height to 46.2 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure can be supported. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-404 of the Community Development Code, within the MHDR District off-street parking is required to be provided at a rate of 2.0 parking spaces per attached dwelling unit. Therefore, the proposed 11 attached dwellings require 22 off-street parking spaces. As proposed 22 off-street parking spaces will exist; thus the development proposal meets its parking requirement. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The development proposal includes a refuse enclosure within the building; thus it will be screened in keeping with the Code. Mechanical equipment associated with the development is proposed to be located on the roof within a 3.2-foot high opaque acrylic/aluminum enclosure, which will screen the equipment from view of abutting properties and public streets. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, where attached dwellings will abut other attached dwellings, a 10-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer with trees 35 feet on center is required. The development proposal (attached dwellings) will abut existing attached dwellings on both its eastern and western perimeters; however buffers of only 5 feet in width have been proposed. As such, the applicant has requested the approval of a Comprehensive Landscape Program with reductions to the eastern and western perimeter landscape buffers as noted above. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 3 • 0 Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X1 proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel nronosed for development is located. The development proposal will be consistent with this criterion provided that the attached conditions of approval, as discussed below, are met. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping along the eastern and western perimeter is still accommodated despite the reduced buffer, and through their reduction enables a southern buffer width that is greater than required. However, it is noted that the overall number of required perimeter trees, pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, is not being met. The development requires a total of 13 trees along the perimeter and only 11 have been proposed (two accent trees or three palms are equivalent to one shade tree). In addition to the above, pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, no more than 25% of the required trees on-site may be accent trees and approximately 75% of the trees proposed are accent trees. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised so as to meet the perimeter tree requirement while having no more than 25% of the total required trees as accent trees. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition being addressed, positive findings can be made with regard to the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program. It is noted that pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, shrubs used as part of a perimeter buffer shall have a height of 18 inches - 24 inches at time of planting. The Indian Hawthorne is proposed at a height of 14 inches; thus it has been attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan must be revised so that at time of planting the proposed Indian Hawthorne has a height of 18 inches - 24 inches. Additionally, pursuant to Section 3-1204.D. of the Community Development Code, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular traffic by the installation of curbing and/or wheel stops. The proposed civil and landscape plans do not depict the provision of curbing at all locations where vehicular traffic abuts landscaping; thus it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, the civil Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 4 0 • and landscape plans must be revised to depict all of the required curbing separating landscaping from vehicular traffic. Si nape: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Island Estates Neighborhood Plan: The Island Estates Neighborhood Plan identifies various goals and objectives in an effort to emphasize strengths and minimize weaknesses in the neighborhood. These goals and objectives have been reviewed, and the following are noted: Objective 3.a.: Install sidewalks and bike paths where they do not exist. While a sidewalk already exists adjacent to the subject property, the existing back-out parking on Skiff Point may often obstruct this sidewalk. As the development proposal includes the elimination of the existing back-out parking, the intent of this objective (to have functional sidewalks) will be furthered through the development proposal. Objective 41: Promote the screening of all mechanical equipment, dumpsters and trash containers from public rights-of-way, adjacent property and the waterfront. As discussed previously, the development proposal includes a refuse enclosure within the building and locates associated mechanical equipment on the roof within a 3.2-foot high opaque acrylic/aluminum enclosure, which will screen the equipment from view of abutting properties and public streets. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this objective. Objective 5.e.: Development and redevelopment must be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. As concluded through this review, as well as a review of Section 2- 1602.1-1 of the Community Development Code, the development proposal is found to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404 of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent I.S.R. 0.85 0.69 X Density 30 dwelling units per acre 27.54 dwelling units per acre X Minimum Front: 10-25 feet South: 15.3 feet (to building) X1 Setbacks 0 feet (to pavement) Side: 0-10 feet East: 16 feet (to building) X1 5 feet (to pavement) West: 10 feet (to building) X1 5 feet (to pavement) Rear: 0-15 feet North: 15 feet (to building) X1 0 feet (to pavement) Maximum 30 feet 46.2 feet Xz Building Height Off-Street Attached Dwellings - 2.0 spaces per 22 parking spaces X Parkin unit 22 spaces) 1 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 2 See above discussion with regard to Maximum Building Height. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 5 • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.A of the Community Development Code (Attached Dwellings): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Side and rear setback a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any X building by emergency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more X efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in X excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a X parcel of land that is designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the Zoning Atlas. 3. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land that is X designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the Zoning Atlas. 4. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street X by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 5. All waste disposal containers which serve the proposed attached dwellings use are X located within a landscaped enclosed structure. 6. Front Setback a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed X with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been X constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way. C. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property X values. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.F of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Project): Consistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 6 The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the additional development standards for multi-family areas zoned MHDR/IENCOD as per Section 2-1602.H of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Parking. The parking of any type of vehicle, trailer, boat, personal watercraft, X recreational vehicle, or any other similar vehicle shall be prohibited on grass or any other landscaped area. 2. Fences: a. Fences shall not exceed six feet in height between any portion of the principal X structure and any side lot line. b. All fences between the rear building setback line and the seawall shall be non- X opaque (see-through). 3. Landscape Requirements. Use of gravel, stones, cinders and other similar material X in any yard shall be prohibited unless included as an integral, but minor, element of a landscaping plan. 4. Outdoor Storage. The storage of commercial fishing and crabbing equipment shall X be prohibited outdoors on any residential property. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of November 2, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.39-acre subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Skiff Point and Larboard Way; 2. That the property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District of the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD); 3. That the property is located within the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 7 0 0 Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.A of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.17, of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-1602.H of the Community Development Code and with the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD); 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 feet to 46.2 feet (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 feet for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 15.3 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 feet to 5 feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised so as to meet the perimeter tree requirement while having no more than 25% of the total required trees as accent trees; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan must be revised so that at time of planting'the proposed Indian Hawthorne has a height of 18 inches - 24 inches; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the civil and landscape plans must be revised to depict all of the required curbing and/or wheel stops separating landscaping from vehicular traffic; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit must be provided; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree preservation plan that has been prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture must be provided; 6. That all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site; 7. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 8. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and. hydrants Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 8 are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 9. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 10. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 11. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); and 12. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Future Land Use Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBISkiffPt 240-250 - Mako (MHDR-IEOD) - 12-19-06(RT)ISkii f Pt 240-250 - Staff Report 12-19-06.doc Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 9 • Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-07045- Page 10 Property Appraiser General Inf?ation: 08/29/15/43398/000/0410 Page 1 of 1 Building Data for this Map of this Back to Query New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this parcel parcel Results Search Information PVe Parcel Number 08/29/15/43398/000/0410 Data Current as of July 25, 2006 [1:54 pra Friday July 28] Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER UNIT 5-A LOT 41 2005 Exemptions (2006 Exemptions will be posted after TRIM Notices are mailed in August) Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2005 Value Comparable Sales value based on historical sales from 2003-2004: $870,700 Just/Market Value: $707,600 History_ Assessed Value/Save our Homes Cap: $707,600 Taxable Value: $707,600 Warning: A significant taxable value increase may occur when sold. Click here for details and info. regarding the posting of exemptions. 2005 Tax Information Tax District: CW Millage: 23.2372 Special Tax: $.00 Taxes: $16,442.64 Taxes without Save-Our- $16,442.64 Homes cap: Taxes without any $16,442.64 exemptions: Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Multi-Family - Less ... 14155/0501 ("8_ Census Tract: 260.01 Evacuation Zone: A Mailin Address Property-Address AFFORDABLE DENTAL LLC 430 JASMINE WAY 250 SKIFF PT CLEARWATER FL 33756-3822 Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 1964 060/ 051 Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/1 3/2005 14155/501 $481,600 U I 4/2004 13533 / 1209 $747,000 Q I 6/2003 12858 / 2620 $547,500 Q I 1/1998 9972 / 754 $225,000 Q I Land Information Seawall: Yes Frontage: View: River/Canal Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Multi- Family--7! 63 x 149 7,400.00 63.00 F Less ... (48). Building Data for this Map of this Back to Qum New Tax Collector parcel ap rcel Results Search Information p org/general.php?pn=152908433980000410 Question/Comment about this page 7/28/2006 Property Appraiser General In*ation: 08/29/15/43398/000/0400 • Page 1 of 1 Building Data for this Map of this Back to Query_ New Tax Collector Question/Comment about this ap rcel parcel Results Search Information Pap Parcel Number 08/29/15/43398/000/0400 Data Current as of July 25, 2006 [1:53 pra Friday July 28] Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER UNIT 5-A LOT 40 2005 Exemptions (2006 Exemptions will be posted after TRIM Notices are mailed in August) Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2005 Value Comparable Sales value based on historical sales from 2003-2004: $812,300 Just/Market Value: $659,600 History_ Assessed Value/Save our Homes Cap: $659,600 Taxable Value: $659,600 Warning: A significant taxable value increase may occur when sold. Click here for details and info. regarding the posting of exemptions. 2005 Tax Information Tax District: CW Millage: 23.2372 Special Tax: $.00 Taxes: $15,327.26 Taxes without Save-Our- $15,327.26 Homes cap: Taxes without any $15,327.26 exemptions: Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Multi-Family- Less ... 14155/0503 W8) Census Tract: 260.01 Evacuation Zone: A Mailing Address Property Address NEW HORIZONS PROPERTIES LLC 240 SKIFF PT 430 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756-3822 Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 1964 060/ 051 Sale Date Book/Page Price >/U V/I 3/2005 14155 / 503 $525,200 U I 4/2004 13508 / 1643 $747,000 Q I 10/2003 13143/1145 $527,000 Q I 1/1999 10365 / 1067 $235,000 Q I Land Information Seawall: Yes Frontage: View: River/Canal Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Meth od Multi- Family - 60 x 140 7,400.00 60.00 F Less ... C08) Building Data for this Map of this Back to Query New Tax Collector parcel parcel Results Search Infornation http://www.pepao.org/general.php?pn=152908433980000400 Question/Comment about this pie 7/28/2006 L CLEARWATER HARBOR WATERWAY (P) 87*a4E jP vD _ FlY PF7rAJ w . 40- D? S' Do's D L1 D12 Ilf? ?EEL STOP /---O OF - ,( BLDG. ABOVE ft aft _D D WOOD C CAP (POOL I I R Q 1 I b ? ? •I I _ I 4' _ J WALK I I BLDG. ABODE 5' I p .L I ? g 1D?? Ilk 11 d? I VNEW 4' CONC. WALK NEW 20'x2O' SIGHT _?? Q NTED WH/IE WAL VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 10'x10' TRASH (am) L--?-STAGING AREA r cove W., °'°?•.. tS? ° ->° CURB f1? ". ?;61JRS ;M E, INV M= ^.T t' ORIGINAL RECEWFF" FEB 0 --) 2001 PLANNING Utrrai .'vitNT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 CLEAR WATER HAR* 46 WATERWAY (P) 57ftfavz 4?w 10'? r ?a o? o o o e CONC M, WOOD DOCK Cl I I _ I 0 Q N I I MADE VALL CAP D.oo. k'5 \ `6i BLOCK WALL ?r ASP\T? Oj?.I' r • I- g o 4 ` ?v c"I o 2 L u Q ~~.I~~~~-D~~~~ z~ 0 00 ~ a U~CI ~ 3 ~ ~I 1 0 N® d ~b ~ ~ ~"4~~~. Z ~ ~ tea I~ ~ CLEARWATER HARBOR WATERWAY P ~ ~ m~ ® . S~ ~ I ~4~ F `~~'(F ) i Z N~ S~~4 ~ B T >30~ UIT r~ 6pO6, WOOD DOC GATE ~ ~ ~ t.2' WiOE g i -SEAWALL CaP ~i 0 J ,n ~l '~~~:~t A ~ . • \ , Z VV ~ ~ t~ ~ a ~ r.:... - ~ D _ . f: ®o . , ryW ~er~N I -gyp cj~(I~~l~'=,~°-~' HIGH •:.,,VAULT.,;::.. ~ M ~ ~ 1 LANDSCAPE ::r6..,:.;.:::' - 36" H1CH FENCE ~ PDOL " - NON-OPAQUE ~ • PVC FENCING ~ Z'~ 9 ~M b M 5' ' ~ ~ S J W® ~ ~ , , l . ourLrNE of ~ r ® 1 ~ ~ ~ ...1.,.., . BLDG. A80VE ~ ~ : <fV R Cy J M ; 0 W~ ]0 ~ I ~ i, ~ 11''E y d l~ J t l • . 5 EB #5936 ~ ~ v / ~ I ~ z .:..y ~ s PEE / ~ r ~ 0 P°PL ~ ion 0 91 y fps \ . ' \ SPidE 1 • ~ .::1.....~,. OU NE OF ° 8 ~ • I f BLDG ABOVE ~ T ~ \ : . s 0 ~ ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ B ~}S NES Comm.; 0627 Drawn By: B.J.V. N _ . w r..: ::..:.........:.1.:... 1 Checked By: H.G. f o R:..:..:... ~ ~ . Fx. ~ ~ ' °NO wAIK / NEW 4' ~ ~ ~yS~~'~.. CONC. WALK NEW 4' ~ ~`~-~~~F op CDNC. WALK ~5p Issue Date: 07/28106 N - ~ . oM ~ ~ NorES. Revisions: • . ~ ~ .:.:...c';:::: LANDSCAPE " Ex, C~ ~ FENCE 7. MINIMUM CLEAR NEIGNT OF PARKING GARAGE TO BE No, Date Description 8~ 2" TO ACCOMMODATE HANDICAP UAN PARKING, c NEW 20x20 SICHT ~ \ ~ r~~ BLOCK ,41 lEL~;.WHITE >oHw ~ ~a„ V1S1B21TY TRIANGLE (FJ 3 ~ wau 2. ALL SUBSTANDARD SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS 0 (TYP,) ~ ~ 1 ~ 10x10 TR4SH ~ ~ ~ STAGING AREA Hw ADJACENT TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT TO BE BROUGHT ~ ~ UP TO STANDARD INCLUDING ADA TRUNCATED DOMES PER Q L ` ~ > C w CpN Ail( FDOT INDEX #304. Q ~ UA$~ ~ 0, DINT o P ~ w`~~~ ~ CURB INL ' I 1,- P~~ D p0 ~ Ps ~ I O i. Sp1 ~ \ ~ T 0 i - • ` \ v~ ~ ~ 'CURB INLET 0 in D / m ~ ~ 10P=3,32 ~ 1HROAT=2,5T j INV.(N)= -0.71' ~ INV,(SE)= -0.62' / CURVE TABLE _ IN'V.(SdV)= -0.74' ~ ~ CURB INLET z !CURB INLET CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA C1 (F) 150,00 42,48' 42.34' S83'46'15°E 16'13'36° f..L ~ ~ v. INV.(E)=D27' TOP=3,27' TOP=3.27' Ct P 150.00 42,41' 42.21 S83'41'1O"E 8'06'01° THROAT=2.51' ~ INV,(Wj=0.49' THROAT=2.51' ~ y, INV.(NIW)-0.15 INV.(NIW)=0.15' ~ ~ IN'J.(S)=0,66' IN'J.(57=0.66' CURB INLET N - TOP-3.33' THROAT=2.58 ~ ,o INV.= -0,21' ~ \ ~ 1 ~ b ~ N ' r 2 ° To nT,g~~~ , ~ ~ 0 v I N O ~ I i n i I 4- Y ® ~ p~ ~ O N I• ~ u H ~ a~ Lv NORTH:- ~ . I 0 ~ y~ Y Q SCALE: 1"~20' ~ Q I• ~ ~ r cv cU ' O ~ Q °J N 20 0 10 ~0 40 ~ ~ N V 1~ U 9! ~ N LL THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND'.SHALL E' Ut dHEfPI~SA& F°T+IE r~ ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED (fit USF~® IMANY,WAY I'THOUf, THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER, QCOPZRIGHL 2097 N Xk ByISHED Q C) ~t1o,A~i 0 Q _ • ~E611~11~7 2 F2 O RAM A. G OE L h.D. P.E. #474 1~0~ C R 1Y jt O N COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID °iyNLESS,,, EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEERS SEAL I~ N a • z 4 C~ Q ~ d Np ` d ~3 Z ~ l RBOR CLEARWATER HA STORMSTRUCTURE TABLE ~ ~ N • WATERWAY (P) STRUC, ~ STRUCNRE TYPE TOP ELEV. !NV ELEV ® N z - ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ m a ® `5~ ~h S~ , d ra Q WATER TIGHT OPENING OJ d @ CONC. SEAWALL Q ~ ~ I X34. MODIFIED TYPE 'C' INLET a I ® ® NEW ° PVC DOM. W ~ 3~ rl, NEW 6 PVC ® B ~ ~ ~0 < (RJ r DR i4 F ® 36' MIN, COVER r,. ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 CONTROL STRUCTURE 3, 8 0, 8 ~ 36 MIN, COVER 0 ® h ~`~'Stl, A ~ ® NEW 4 PVC DR14 F ^ tk. ~ 30E VI7 WOOD WATER TIGHT OPENING ~ P ~ 3 @ RETENTION VAULT 1,8 ~ 36' MIN, COVER , ~ ,y`1~ o-0 YP 6Q~6, r ~ >a rF NEW 6" GV ~ 4 ~ NEW 1 2" M&BFP o ^~ti NE'W S5~~.I ~ DOCK e ~ m r STANDPIPE ~ 11 ' I. ' ~ , ® TYPE "C" INLET 4,8 2,05 ` z Oj p,~,' r ~IN'y6 `'7~ S[ WALE CAF/-INV= -1.04 NEW 6 DCVA NEW FDC ~ r .4~ICr~`~I. o~ P, ~ 'y •y~C o. G~;j0/ 0°' ~'y• fQ TYPE 'C" INLET 5.0 2,3 NEW 6" TEE TBO & SP NEW,~~8 C;F, . r ~ ~ ~ p1 ~ r< WATER TIGHT OPENING 6 @ RETENTION VAULT 1.8 Z ~ 6'X2" TEE ®0%~SLO$~ r 2 5 srrl 51~t~ ' NEW 6" DIP e 0 ~ r ~ o~ 1~' ~o,, ~ POLYWRAPPED 8 S,P, NEW FHA tx 1 FLUSH THROUGH ~ Y ~ ~ a' 4, ~ TYPE »C° INLET 5.8 2,2,5 ~ ~ HYDRANT r f ~ ~ ~ 5.4 ~ p a I a ~ I ® TYPE »C° GRATE 5.0 0 r .3 NEW ~0,~ h. M CHLORINE 1NJECTIO SP r I ORETEN110N ~ 6.0 I PDlNT ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ® rfl m ® CHLORINE INJECTION POINT , ~ r ~ VAULT s.o ~ ~ y ~ ~ , (SEE DETAIL) 5• ~ ~ Q? I NEW 6" T&V ~ ~ G !y'~ , ~ `L I r~i 8 I r ~ r c,o. ® g I~ r I Z NEw s r&v ~ Q 3 nn z I ® I I a ~ ~ IJ ~ STORNf PIPE SCHED ULE ~ ~ ° °5.3 ® I ~ r ° 5.4 STRUCTURE TO PIPE LENGTH PIPE PIPE PIPE SLOPE STRUCTURE (FT.J .SIZE TYPE lqJ ~ p ~ I ~ ~ ; . 1 ° ° ~ ~ • ° ~ ORAINACE EASEMENT - ~ 13 18" RCP .77 ~ QZ ~ I ~ ,W r r . . ~F I ~ / r I ~ I , W~ ® a I Q - ® 55 15' RCP 0,30 ~ / r 5.6 I < 10~ } r r r 5 6 ' ^~o a I r ~ , . ~ 68 12" DIP 0:36 ~ V ~ I PIKE ~ ~ r Q 55 15» RCP O,a2 EB #5936 v o r _ h ~ 5~ / G R ~ F ~d r® r ~ I I ~ I I - r J / ~ ~ r ~6 . 5.3 - ~ i~• r NEW 6 PVC h• I I ~ r B ~ I 4 toy 5 F. / : r 1 SAN, SEW. ~ ~ ~ ~,1Uyp~a 5~ ~ r ~ iq MIN, ~ 6 I ~ ~;~E - r r 4 i e ~ ~ ' U ERP ~ I ~ r ~ y, FF~,, k 4.8 ~ 0~ h' A l a r r r cl; ~ ~ 1 I ~z rr5k, ~ NES Comm.: Ofi27 o ~ h ® S I ? , ~ e ® I~, h ~ ~ _ ~ b Drawn By: B,J.V. a ~ r +5.0 ~ ~ 5.0 ~ 5.0 I Checked By; H.G, s'39p9, c 12 ~ C ~~yy, ~~w I C,O. h• I P •k'~ ~ hW . 0 e ,tip I "°TE~ Issue Date: 07128!06 ALL ,OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND, Revisions: N Ix~` ~rO~", , b•' IV^TfR~ ~~TUr'W~~ `L ph `b~ $ tx• n . ~ HR I y. >x ' No, Date Description +J rEa. 7 WA(k ~ I I ~ ` a,~0`yp\. (F~ ® ~ C~ G ~ WALL ~ p• ~ ~ e W I ~ Cti _ ` \ ) ~ ` 'kyy\~ ` Ek. Wq rE 'y' X1'1 ~ - Ek • ` a~• ~ ~ CpyC W ~ p ~ _ 0 ' 'h~ NT ~ PSI ~P~~ ~ H `l` ~ °a• ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ J ~ 1 N ~ CURD INLET +,r'~ /J ' TOP=3:32 v1 iHRnAT_ 2_~, ` ~y°~, f ^ INV.(N) 0,71' ~ / _ ~~t, ~ 1 INV,(5C)= -0.62' ~ ~ ~ ~ / CURVE TABLE kl,~°•' INV.(51N)= -G.74' oq ~ ~DURD INLET CURB INLET CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA INV. E =0.27' 0`0 TOP=3.27' y Ci F) 150,00 42,48' 42.34' SB3'46'15"E 16'13'36" TOP=3,27' Ct P 150.00 42,41' 42.27 SB3'41'10"E 8'06'01" ~ ~ INV.(Wj-0.49 THROAT=2.51 co \ S INV. NW =0.1 THROAT=2.51' INV.(NW)=0.15' ~ ~ ~ v~ ( ) O ~ 0 ~1,~ INV,(S)=0.66' INV,(S)=0,66' ~ CURD INLET ~ _ z _ ~ N TOP-,,.~3 THROAT=2,58 r~ . WW p INV.= -0.21' , p 0 N 1 ~I ~ b ~aAA Vr N ' 1~ O~ •1 3 Z' 1, W i ~ I i 0 J 0 .o ~ ~ I w a~ E~ 4,5' WIDE HS-20 GRATE TOP EL. 5.0 MIN, o~ ~ B01: SLAB EL,4,33 W ~ ~ ~ TYPE "C" INLET TOP EL. 3,8 Ce7 ~ • •Y ~ ~ ~ , 3" MIN. LAYER OF ~ 20 Z i 3/4 WASHED GRAVEL 0 18„ ® N ~ SKIMME CONTROL STRUCTURE 3 COMPACTED ROCK u I I BOTTOM OF . ~ ~ ~ TOP EL 4.05 W/ GREASE SKIMMER N BOT EL 3.30 VAULT EL,=1,8 ~ ~ BO>; OF VAULT ~ • ~ > b o cv 3" THICKNESS ; 9 SEPARATION FROM waualc D I EL 1, 8 FACE OF STRUCTURE TO III ~ 2 ° NORTH ~ u III III ~ ® ~ w% FACE OF SKIMMER 80L OF VAULT I;, ~ I'I o 3^ EL 7.8 ICI _ I~IL==III= =11111= Q ~ 6 =mau= 6" PVC PERF. ~ ~ 6" PIPE W/SOCK SCALE: 1 -20 ~ ® ~ FILTER ~ FILTER MEDIUM 4,5 I. MEDIUM 6" U.D. I,E=0.8 ~ N~ „ lNV fL, 0.8 IMPERVIOUS MEMBRANE ~ Q ® W 6 U.D. 4 SIDES & ENDS 30 MIL ~ N ~ INV. EL. 0.8 o. ~ NOTE.' 20 o io ~o MEDIA SHALL COMPRISE ~ t' ii 18" RCP NEITHER //57 ROCK_NOR_FILTER_MEDIA SHALL C( INV. EL. 0.8 L1ML5IUNL, LIMLRUGK UM UIHER GALLIUM GARU( ' CALCIUM GAR60NATE o AGGREGATES. THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL RE . IN ~fi~ PR~EYtTY OE E . ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR tiSED IN Ar4~ WAY WITHOUT- Q CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL VAULT SECTION 0 THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. QCOPYRI:HT 2107 NOOT~~ I H€D ' UNDERDRAIN DETAIL DETAIL ;FED 0Vt. t ;p N.T,S, N.T.S. N.T.S. Q C3 m I A 0 0 RAM A. GEGL, Ph.D., P.. #4743, 1 ~4 R COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID: UNLE~S',r','' N EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL y GNP~"a~~m N _ Z '0 g 0 ®o HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND IRRIGATION NOTES ICONTINUEDI ~ a ~ v LANDSCAPING PERMITS THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND IRRI- GATION SYSTEM TO COVER 100% OF ALL ON SITE PLANTING AREA, ~ ~ ~ THIS SYSTEM SHALL CONTAIN BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ~ ^ ~ 1, A HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMIT IS REQUIRED 1, UNDERGROUND PIPING, SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER, O N Q FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, APPLICATION SHOULD NOT 2, SEVEN 7 DAY PROGRAMMABLE TIME CLOCK TO ACTIVATE ZONES, BE MADE UNTIL FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED. ~ a P 3, SPRINKLER HEADS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TYPE OF PLANTING, N v~ a, AN APPLICATION AND AN EXTRA COPY OF THE APPROVED FINAL 4. ELECTRIC VALVES. APPLICATION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT IN 5, GAUGE 14 OF COPPER WIRE, ~ ~ ORDER TO PROCESS THE PERMIT. 6. FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC ZONE VALVE BOXES, V I~ b. ALL EXOTIC SPECIES, I.E., BRAZILIAN PEPPER (SCHINUS TEREBIN- WHERE PIPING IS UNDER DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE WALKS THE PIPES ~ ~ THIFOLIUS), PUNK TREES (MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA), AND CHINESE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES 18" BELOW GRADE, ' ® ~ ~ TALLOW (SAPIUM SEBIFERUM) MUST BE REMOVED AS A CONDITION OF W SITE DEVELOPMENT, WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO 0 N Z PROTECTED PLANT MATERIAL, HAND REMOVAL WILL BE REQUIRED. MATERIALS SUPPLIED SHALL BE EQUAL TO TH05E MANUFACTURED BY ~ ~ SHOULD THIS REMOVAL BE TD A DEGREE THAT A POTENTIAL FOR RAIN BIRD CO, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ~ `d EROSION IS CREATED, THE AREA MUST BE RESTABILIZED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL. ~ ~ ~ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SYSTEM LAY-OUT ALONG WITH c, ONCE FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL {FAA) HAS BEEN GRANTED, A CATALOG SHEETS OF ALL COMPONENTS IN THE SYSTEM TO THE z N ~ BARRICADE INSPECTION CAN BE SCHEDULED. WHEN THE BARRICADES OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, ~ CLEAR WA TER HARBOR HAVE BEEN APPROVED THE PERMIT CAN BE TYPED AND RELEASED. WATERWAY (P) TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATIONS THE ENTIRE 5Y5TEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ~ ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE ARCHITECT/ TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE REQUIREMENTS; ENGINEER, S)~~, , 1. TREE BARRICADES AND/OR SILT SCREENS OR HAYBALES SHALL BE ~F ~ ~ REQUIRED ALONG THE EDGES OF VEGETATED AREAS TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPE ANY AND ALL USE OF HOSE BIBBS IN ASSOCIATION WITH Z ~81(~ i !15 Jam' PERMITS. THE LOCATION FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE ~ s~~ , a 20 ~138F MJ p vlr ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, WITH SBCCI STANDARD PLUMBING CODE, CHAPTER VI CRITERIA REFERENCE COLOR CODING OF ABOVE GRADE RISER PIPING IN 6pQ6, WOOD 2, ALL DESIRABLE TREES MUST BE RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE, AND LABEL/TAGGING OF OUTLETS AS NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. ~ J DocK p ~ ` 1,2' WIDE IT WILL BE REQUIRED THAT PROP05ED IMPROVEMENTS (i.e. BUILDINGS, • WALKWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, POND BANKS, DRAINAGE 5Y5TEMS, ETC.} BE V A? SEP.IM1ALL CAP ADJUSTED TO RETAIN DESIRABLE TREES. GRADE CHANGES MUST BE ANY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED IS SUBJECT TO NOTIFICATION y~ ~ ~ ' C 1 2 ~ SENSITIVE TO TREES REMAINING. IN GENERAL, ND GRADE CHANGES TO THE AIR TOXICS SECTION OF .THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT = ~ ~ SHOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF PINE TREES AND OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OF ~ OL '~'>1'?' ~ id 2/3 THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF HARDWOOD TREES TO BE SAVED. BUILDINGS. Z ~ ^q f IH LANDSCAPING ~ ' ~ 1 ` F~ 1. EACH LANDSCAPING AND REPLANT TREE MUST BE PLANTED WITHIN XERISCAPING .1 W - 47 ~ 25 1 NOTE; ALL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES r5 ` ~ \ A MINIMUM FIVE {5) FOOT BY TEN (10) FOOT OPEN SPACE PLANTER d ~ ~ WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE EL Gq 1H ` GROWING SEASON. WITH SUITABLE GROUND COVER, LANDSCAPE TREES MUST BE PLANTED 1, ORGANIC MULCHES AND/OR DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVERS ® H IN SAME VICINITY AS VEHICULAR USE AREAS IN ORDER TO BREAK THE WITHIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTER BEDS, rr1 25 - EL ~ 2 MONOTONY OF UNBROKEN EXPANSES OF PAVING, TREES MUST NOT ~ Q BE PLANTED WITHIN MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS. r P Im r ~ For Cabbage Palm Installation: Fo Cabbage o s; OL Trim All Fronds at Time All Trunks to be Smooth and 20 of Digging and Planting All Burn Marks Brushed Away !H 2, THE USE OF XERISCAPE DESIGN MUST BE UTILIZED FOR THE 2. DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL. ~ ~ ~ REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DE51GN. THE DESIGN DEMONSTRATES THE USE ~ I~ For Washington Palm Installation; For Washington Palms; Leave inside row of fronds Leave all boots on trunk ~ , DF A LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ORGANIC MULCHES, DROUGHT 3. GROUPING OR ZONING PLANT MATERIAL BASE ON SIMILAR WATER AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL, ZONING OF PLANT MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE LOCATION OF PROP05ED IRRIGATION 0 W Tie u with Mode radable twine P g _ 2 Layers Burlap Pod at 3 ~ BY WATER REQUIREMENTS, SOIL AMENDMENTS (IF NECESSARY) AND THE WATERING SYSTEMS, 3 Support Contact - No ~ s Nils in r W od 1 o+ a tee o PRACTICAL USE OF TURF, ~ ~ ~ _ ~ , i e, ~ ~ 4. THE USE OF SOIL TESTING TO IDENTIFY 501E CONDITIONS NECES- EB 'R~~7~18 ~ o'~ 3. NEW LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR MOVE- SARY FOR THE CONTINUED SURVIVAL OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, Wire Tie ~ ;r ~ I MENT BY WHEEL STOPS, RAILROAD TIES, OR OTHER SUITABLE BARRIER, V ~0 V WHERE POSSIBLE, THE AREA BETWEEN THE BARRIER AND LANDSCAPE 5. ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENTS SUCH AS TOP SOILS, MANURE'S, PEAT ~ ~ ~ $ + °1®+ ®mi I ~ 2" x 4" Brace (Yellow Pine) ~ B 4,,, MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN AS GREENSPACE. AND COMPOSTED MATERIALS) MIXED EXISTING SOILS WITHIN LANDS- o Space Three at 120' Typical $ $ , 1 4 w Remove after one growing season, , ,p-l \ $ $ + + ` 1 ~ BW 4, LARGE TREE SPECIES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST BE A GAPING PLANTER BEDS TO DEPTHS CON515TENT WITH THE ROOT DEPTH ~ 2° x 4' Stoke (Yellow Pine) / $ $ ® / °p++ / $ MINIMUM OF 20 FEET AWAY FROM BUILDINGS, SIGNS, FENCES, LIGHT OF PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL (USE ONLY IF EXISTING SOIL Three Feet Long / \ $ / emove after one. rowin season, ~ ~ 5~ d ~ ' • POLES, UTILITY LINES AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT MAY CONDITIONS WARRANT THESE AMENDMENTS). IMPAIR NATURAL GROWTH, Saucer Rim ~ c~ ® 8 1 • 6, THE PRESERVATION AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANT pity h . ~ ~ 52 Finish Grade ~-I ~ ```C ~ EL 5. TREES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST NOT BE IN CONFLICT COMMUNITIES ON SITE INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, NES Comm.; 0627 WITH PROPOSED OR EXISTING UTILITY LINES OR STRUCTURES, EASE- - - _ 3" Minimum Mulch ~ / 4 S ~ ~ 52 MENTS OR OTHER AREAS WHICH MAY REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN THE 7, THE MINIMAL USE OF TURF GRASSES WHICH REQUIRE FREQUENT Drawn By: B,~,U, EVENT OF SYSTEM FAILURE, THESE FEATURES SUCH AS THE WATER IRRIGATION. • / ~ ~ $ ~ `1 _ ` ~ \ ~ d ~ GA LINES MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE THE 5' X 10' PLANTER AREA, :I I L,.. ~ I_-` ~ w-.._~ Rootball, 16° Minimum LL e? ~ ~ i ~ L_... .....I Radius From Trunk I C1 1~~~. ® $ ~ n 6 r.._~-.._.~II. ~ 51id6 ri RELDCATE4EXISnNO 6 f a i}5P6P 8, LOW-MAINTENANCE DESIGN. Checked By: H.G. a) 10 ~ ARECAPALMS ® ~ 1 ~ 1 ---.ILL-•.-I ,Washed-In and Tamped ~ ~5d \ $ $ 6. SOILS WITHIN PLANTER BEDS MUST BE SUITABLE FOR PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL WITH REGARDS TO pH, SOIL TEXTURE, SOIL _i _,.I I Planting Soil Mixture 5~~rfE ~ $ STRUCTURE, AND SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE, TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS -;::L I_~::.:~~~ ~ _~t~y-_ Existing Soil ~ ~ ~ , 7. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MUST BE FLORIDA GRADE ;~1 OR BETTER. Issue Date. 07/28106 B. ALL REQUIRED TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10' HIGH, 2-1/2° 1, THE ROOT MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION TB cy ~ a•;, 9 5 4 1Z 5 i4 ~ ~ CALIPER AT TIME OF PLANTING. R@VISIOIIS¦ SHALL BE BALLED OR BURLAPPED, BARE R00T TREES ARE NOT AC- rn ~ ~ $ r9 ~ \ 6 ~ L~ PALM STAKING + PLANTING DETAIL - ~ . ~ PP ~ ' PD ~ 46 - - , w 9, ALL HEDGES MUST BE 24" HIGH AT THE TIME OF PLANTING, CEPTABLE, ALL NONBIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL BE REMOVED No, Date Descri tion PLANTED AT 30° ON CENTER, AND BE MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM OF AND BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED DOWN TO ENHANCE WATER ABSORPTION, 3' IN HEIGHT, IF WIRE BASKETS ARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND N.T.S. ~ 55 BURLAPPED TREES, THE FIRST FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET WILL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. 10. WHERE LANDSCAPE OR REPLANT TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE Q PLANTED IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER, THE BUFFER MUST BE A MINIMUM 0 of 5' wIDE. 2, SUPPORTING APPARATUS SHALL DE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE Q a~ GROWING SEASON, ALSO THE FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED LL ~ ~p9 1~p9~" ` ~x o ~l ~ PP IRRIGATION NOTES Wo EPREVENTP~AMBIALEDAMAGEWRAPPED AROUND TREE TRUNKS/STEMS Zi E ! ~ 1, SHALLOW WELLS, OPEN SURFACE WATER BODIES, OR RECLAIMED 3. PLANTING HOLES A550CIATED WITH PROPOSED TREES MUST SLOPE 0 CROWN SPREAD PF o~ ®W~p ~B C\ wAL .i MJ WATER MUST BE USED AS A SOURCE OF IRRIGATION WATER. THE DIST- NOT COMPACTED AND A MINIMUM OF 18-24 INCHES WIDER THAN NEw 20 X2o' slcHr ~ K 138 y ; ~ BLOCK x V1SlBILITY TRIANGLE a „ , 6 ~FJ ~`~rilr~i il~•,_ L RIBUTION SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION MUST NOT BE CONNECTED TO THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL, TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH 0 COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL WATER SOURCES, UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMON- THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS IS LEVEL WITH THE SURFACE OF u., r8 • . ~ ~ ~ ~nu~11~1 STRAYED THAT THESE SOURCES ARE NOT AVAILABLE, THE PLANTING HOLE. TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLED 3 - 5 INCHES NOTE; ALL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES "'~~s 'r'gre / !H R ExrsnNG ABOVE GRADE ON SITES CONTAINING CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH LAYER OF 0 WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE ~ 50 cx. a ` . ~a' W~'~j~;r~ CANARYPALM ~ A 2, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGNS SUCH AS ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE Q LOW TRAJECTORY HEADS OR SOAKER HOSES TO PROVIDE DIRECT AP- OF EACH PLANTING HOLE, TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH GROWING SEASON, ~ ~ i' . MJ 134 ~ TO REMAIN m i 1 j / PLICATION AND LOW EVAPORATION, SYSTEMS THAT OVERSPRAY AREAS SHOULD BE PULLED BACK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH ~ MJ ` • i l ~ Remove Deod and Injured , O~ c~ Twi s, Trim No Leaders, ~ _ ~ ! / ~ THAT DO NOT REQUIRE IRRIGATION, SUCH AS PAVED AREAS WILL NOT TREE. Q AE ACCEPTABLE. HIGH IRRIGATION NEED AREAS MUST NOT OVERSPRAY w Retain Natural Shape, ~ = ~ 1, I .'~f~ LOW NEED AREAS, 4, IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMENDMENTS / - jj RE-LOCATE 3/4° 2 Ply Reinforced Q WILL BE NECE55ARY, THE PLANTING MUST INCLUDE 501E MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF EACH PLANTER AREA TD A 3. HIGH WATER DEMAND LANDSCAPE AREAS SUCH AS TURF MUST BE DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED ~ ~ Rubber or Plastic Hose ~ q p • _ j,~l 2EXISTING W N u. A ~ j o C r CANARY PALMS SERVED BY A SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONE THAN LOW WATER NEED PLANT MATERIAL, N White Surveyors Tagging ' Tape, 6" Length ' PLANTER BEDS, OR MULCHED AREAS WITH TREES, IN NO CASE, SHALL ANY PLANTED VEGETATION AREA BE MORE THAN 50' FROM A WATER 5, PLANTERS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST _ N - Galvanized Wires ~ SUPPLY HOSE BIBS. BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT LIMEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE DR ANY 3 12 Guoge ri~ Spaced 120 Around Tree and • K) ~ i OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DO NOT EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE INTO Set At A 45'Angle With 3- # 68 ~ \ 1 r Duckbill Anchors Or Equal 4, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE OPERATED BY AN IRRI- THE PLANTING AREAS, / CATION SYSTEMS OPERATED BY AN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER ~ Remove after one growing season. p \ CAPABLE OF DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE SCHEDULES OF HIGH AND 6, THE PRACTICE OF TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND THE APPLICATION OF LOW WATER DEMAND AREAS, CONTROLLERS MUST HAVE MULTIPLE PAINTS/TAR ONTO PRUNED TREE BRANCHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED N 4 Min, Mound To Farm Saucer ~ I,It.--III-. ~ CYCLE START CAPACITY AND A FLEXIBLE CALENDAR PROGRAM ABLE TO BY THE INTERNATIONAL 50CIETY OF ARBORICULTURAL. :~,1i .all L ~ ~ LA-1!1-au~ ~ I. ;:I Ilt-ltl-; - - 3" Minimum Mulch Layer ~ ~ ~ U ~ r~- -IT1 '11 Ili t' iii i i::al1-.:.:III,. BE 5ET TO .COMPLY WITH LOCAL OR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS. 7, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE U5E OF FERTILIZERS DURING PLANT (\i n ~ -Remove Burlap From 1 f!.:;,= Midlil_:- Around Top Of Ball 1 ~ l...il, ~ 111 5, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH RAIN INSTALLATION IS NOT APPROVED, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT FERTILIZATION SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICATION OF NITROGEN) SENSOR DEVICE OR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION OF TREES/SHRUBS ITHIN THE FIRST GROWING SEASON INHIBITS ROOT 3 }:-Iq•,y~`t Planting Soil Mixture T IiL . ,e 1111- 1 CYCLE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN ADEQUATE RAINFALL HAS GROWTH, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP MUST BE CONSTRUCTED • 1--111.-.~~ .1-II . IIL_111_.II~ .I,.:.., ....,II ~ Iii' ~Itl: i.jl„ill 1Li III fll. lll~ I1t~l.I,Y~ ~ ~ n~ ur u. i.:_u.._,IL..~ii...lil-all...ltl~-dll ~ 1 OCCURRED, SUITABLE FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION, W I Provide a minimum 5'x10' ~ unobstructed planting area ~ o I ~ N 1 i KING + PLANTING DETAIL TREE STA Z 4~ N.T.S. `~,iD ~ V/ I~ L1- 4- Landsca e Table p ® ~ o Quantity Cade Name Symbol Scientific Name Common Name Planting Size Height Spacing ~ , N 3 Existing ~ Phoenix canariensis Canary Island date po(m Exr'str'ng/Re-locate 10 fct Per/plan ~i ® ~ ~ I ~ ~ • oa 8 TB Tabebuia chrysotricha Gold Trumpet free 2 1/2"-Cal 10' Per/plop o d•~ o000 EX. TREE LEGEND N 0 RTH ~ 4 BW ~ Conocarpus Erectus Silver Buttonwood 2"-Cal 8' Per/plan I A o00 - r, rye, a p o 109 EL Elaeognus macrophylla B~gleof silverberry 3 Gol 24 36 OC a o 0 3" Minimum Mulch Y ~ 4 Existing ~ Dypsis Lutescens Areco Palm Existing/Re-locate 10'oa Per/plan Q ~ OAK TREE t/1 ~ 4 OL Nerium oleander Oleander 2"-Col 8' Per/plan 3 Soil Saucer ~1?, PINE TREE SCALE: 1"=20' V~ ® ~ ~ .III 'p::._ I _._,,:_:111- 11-11f~-:~ _i_,--.,_,_T;, 14 PD ~ Podocarpus mocrophyllus Yew podocarpus 3-Gal 24' 36"OC -~2,, PALM TREE ~ ~ N :il_; III 111.;:111::::.1 ;;I•,,,II;;,I~._;I~_.1 I' i1--;1 --11~=-- Remove Container " r , i._.,, , ~.._..I LI:,. + ! l..-! 128 GA Schefflera arboncola Green arbonco/a 3-Gal 24 36 OC N 111;;:.111:.! 6" ..III III _ i 1' From Rootball c~~ `:;:;I,II; I.I:i::;I,II- 82 PP Nerium oleander petite Dwarf oleander 3-Gal 24 36'OC ?~2 OTI-IER TREE (A,S I_AI~ELED} z Q ~ a Mln o Plantln Soll Mixture 1::~1 6.. Mln. _I 9 G1. P BUSH 20 0 10 40 J ~ N ~ =III-. ,II=:= 438 MJ Trache/os ermum Asiaficum "Texas" Minima Jasmine 1-Gal 6" 18'OC ' f-J1:=II!=~!-;1.11.:==ILI~~II_!~_IIi: c} -u1 111 11 1~. ui n1._:Ilr--r-- Exlstlna Soll „ ~ 1A~~ /UU rn rruprnuiepis rrnurcu rrnurun nuwinurn J-Uur II JU UL U n BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC. Q 4203 46TH AVE N. ST PETERSBURG FL. 33714 U o SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PH 727-521-1684, FAX: 727-527-7422, E-MAIL:ronsplans®fampabay.rr.com N.T.S. Q CURVE TABU CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA DRAWN BY: RON BELKO _CI (F) 150.00 42.48' 42.34' S83'46'15"E 16'13'36" CHECKED BY: CHUCK BUTLER LlL O 0 Cl P 150.00_42.41' 42,27' S83'41'10°F. 8'06'01" N i N LEGEND • z m 9 9 M~ ~~°U ~ 0 0 0 ~ a ~v EXIST. ELEVATION x Q ~ ~ LOTS 40 8c 41 OF ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER - EXIST. CONTOUR , 1 U ~ F ~ ~ - R MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ~ UNIT 5 A AS PE ~N ' IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 51 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS NEW ELEVATION +10.00 ~ C ~ ~ i AS COUNTY FLORIDA. OF PINELL , NEW CONTOUR _ X10® ~ 9 EXIST. STORM SEWER ~ o? w NEW STORM SEWER F ° ~ Z NEW UNDERDRAIN I J ~ ' Q EXIST. SAN. SEWER ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ i ~ NEW SAN. SEWER ®I®I®I® ~•e EXIST. WATER SERVICE ~ ~ ~ ~ I'~, ® I NEW WATER SERVICE ~~1 NEW INLET `~!d Z W + A ~ ; ~r. ! r.~ i ' t' ;w~~~~~~~,,r - tip` q~'~a` ~ ~ NEW SAN, MANHOLE 4lII' r J`~~~#1 ~ ~ • ~i1 ~ ~h V~ t(~,~~~{qs N NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O.) ® ~ ~ ' i- a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s• ~ ~ ter, ~ ItYi; gStl~ ~ .131 `_r~~r~ <.!~.,u. ~V~yC ~Rir r ~I,4y ~ ~ , ;la~i v ~ i4 i lfl"IILIL1LI.aLII~ ill. ~ Lw NEW BUILDING AREA [:I a i ~l ria I I ELI 1.1_I I ~~u_u.i ~ 1~ ~ ~ M . Z ~~b~~ ~ l.. r,' ~ ~ .C ~ ~ ' ~ NEW ASPHALT ~ ~ _ ~ ~ a ~ ~~'A ~ i'i~ i t 1~ <~r~"."' t. sid, I r ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~`a NEW CONCRETE ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ xis:, , ~ , 9~" ,:u b ' r,~ 1 TEMP. SILT BARRIER ® ~ ~ g ~ f ~~i~;~i ~ ~ ~Iha ek~. V r, ~~i ,l~~r,. .S ^~ap.. ~ ~ ~ POINT OF CONNECTION ~ Q w ~ I` OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST, ~ ~ y JE=* C ~ ~ ~ e ~ u~., / ~ ,r -.~C ' ~'~Ky 4f ~ o ~ ~1't ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M METER ~~i ~ ;bpi. ~ ! ~ ^J1 ~ ;p b t t7t ~ V r i ~ B,F,P.D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE ~ r I~ ~ ~~x~°,i ,I ~ ~ F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EB #936 ~ ~ ~ - ~ fe" ~ 1 ~ ~,~~~~~~~~i~~,"~ F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION g¢, ~ a' ~ 4~' f L 1 i J ' ~ , ~ ' ' ~~~'~~1~ T.B.0, TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF ~ S ~Y:ti, ~ a, b, ~ r ~ d ~ i ~ ~ ~h,tn ~ ~ ~ I >ty ~~s~k~i.~,, ~~II~I11~~,~ Ili!, ~P ~ ~ ~~~~ro. iii r ~ t 5i-tr r~~~+'~k~'~r ~ ~ ~ , ~I~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ !'I'~ ~f ` T.&V. TAP AND VALVE x, << as ~ r t ,~y~ ~ ~ I it , r , qua:r,1` ~ ~~~'~V, r y 1,;d~11k~~ ~ 8 l.. _ ku,' S*~ :r ~ 1 . 1 ~ -.1 NES ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:1~.~ Comm.. 0627 ~~rl'1~ ~ 4i ~ h~' l , ' ''t f,~ ~ ~ ~ Drawn By: B.J.V. ' ~ r , ` Checked By: H~ il~ I : '~~s14 4• 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~~a ~ I t~ n ~ t N nr,.: " 4'~ Issue Date: 47/28106 Q~ ~f.. L la ~+q r _ .,'9;4fFnH ~ ~i} , I'1rl~i 1 ~ 1 S,F~~~ry~` ~ ~r Revisions: Ul O I,~~.c;~, ,I~.~i~r ~ „y No, Date Descri tion ~f) I t= ; i P~~RTH N ° V) I C 0 I I p 0' ° EXISTING E PROPOSED P RE RE UIRED ° Q ~ x MHDR MHDR MHDR INDEX OF SHEETS ° ' ' ZONING: x / ~ RH RH LAND USE, RH i U) L~ C1.1 CIVIL SITE DATA U1 6 APARTMENTS ATTACHED DWELLINGS / USAGE: o.lc. C2.1 STAKING SITE PLAN S 17,398 S.F. 17,398 S.F. G ~5,00o s.F. C3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE ~ r LOT AREA: 0.40 AC. 0.40 AC. 1° cv UTILITIES SITE PLAN N DENSITY: 11 UNITS 31 3o u.P.a. L1,1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN 0 ~ DETAILS 5,714 S.F. 8 317 S,F. ~ BUILDING COVERAGE: ~ o S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE 33.0/ 47.8/ ( ) N GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): 5,714 S.F. rn F.A.R.: 0,33 -o Q, 0' TO TRASH STAGING 19.7' 18.3' TO BLDG. ABOVE (S) FRONT: 12' TO PAVEMENT (S) ~ 25' ® ~ 10' TO BLDG. ABOVE (W} a BLDG. 5' TO PAVEMENT (W) 10' ® ~ SETBACKS: SIDE: 7 5 TD CONC. WALK (E) Y U7 21.7' TO BLDG. (N) ° 20.6' 15' TO PAVEMENT N I- 15' ~ cv REAR: ( ) ~ 0 TO POOL DECK C o • ~ 46.5' TO TOP OF STAIR cv~ BLDG. HEIGHT: 1 STORY TOWER 30' ® La. w THE ABDVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: Y 2,106 S.F. 3,323 SF Q ZONE AE PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 12103C0102G (V.U.A.) ORIGINAL ~ ~ ® ~ Q MAP REVISED: 9/03/2003 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 10,507 S.F. 11,968 S.F. 0.85 ~ECENED ~ ~ ~ ~ , (LS.R.) ~ 0.60 0.69 EEB 0 ~ Z0U1 ~ ~ w ~ OPEN SPACE: 6,891 S.F. 5,430oS.F. (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 40.0/ 31.2/ 5% MIN. PLANNING DEPAId1N!~°nir CITY OF CLEARWAT~:~ ~ ~ ~ N O m ....i ,2 PARKING: 22 22 a _ THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHA@t+ 4AI jHE 'P.tlF IiY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISNE ,USED IN pNY' WP~I WITAQUT o PARKING CALCULATIONS: 11 UNITS ® 2 SPACES PER UNIT = 22 SPACES REQUIRED THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER, oCO I$ T+PUBLISAED U SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY: a KELLY 0, McCLUNG, P.L.S. #4032 oll; 05 w DATED: 11/09/04 a u,. F `RAM A. GOEL Ph.D X1447 1 li,~„" L 0 c= I o. N COPIES OF THESE PLANS 'ARE '1N6t.)VAU EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEE 'rs"A~,~' N i • • i CLEARWATER HARBOR ~ WATERWAY P \ . 553 ' , S~ S~9' £ ~p sa FND `~E J \ 3, gyp) X-CUT y \ 5~5,~ ' „ .yry ,,y i o S~8 BOAT t2' WIDE ,y6 S~s*4 , ~ F e S ~~F ~Op~ DAVIT SEAWALL CAP L 09 6a~, (P) WOOD FN&D • S y ~ (F / y ) DOCK ILLEGIBLE s 1 •y6 yo ~6 FN&D ~ 1 a~6 ~•y ~6 ILLEGIBLE . '0 yry p r4y D~;• ry o y C~ ,yp?` k q p,• y 3 6 ~ (p} 1 ~ ~4} QD 13 ry e(0 k0 k69 FN&D y 0.4T CNORO'34.92 O°8.62 ,~0 y~ s a• 0y ILLEGI LE o°` c~°~ RRO a a. x •y N eP 10.0 , coN ~ N GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE 5 2 C 1° h1 , y1°j1y w 3' CLF ' 13,2' S2 N y' X h y ° 20 0 10 20 20 40 d WOpO y. . 18, . 09 1 OfCk y X w 8 y 'h ~ d y' a• In ~ ~ y~ 25,gp 21,8• T ) o y.x ry I { IN FEET ) 1-STORY 60 6°~ BRICK 1 inch = 20 ft. ?0 ft. X X N ~6 PLANTER ' MASONRY ~ yo X BRICK ~ BLDG. y yry PAilo ~4 , ~ #240 y' Q y9 METAL ~~S` F.F. EL,=6,22 r .124' 10. SHED 1. TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE SUR1 L.V I v v O 1 U a 1-STORY 2. DATE OF SURVEY: NOVEMBER 9, 2004' RAPHIC & TREE SURVEY ' ~ ~ O MASONRY 3. SURVEY CREW: TOM RYAN, MIKE GROSS and SCOTT WIWAN S and SCOTT WILLIAMS ~ U 8~0 BLDG. X 4, ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO TF I /lT '~7, ~ y9k ,y 2 #250 y VERTICAL DATUM OF 198& (NAND 88) ET AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN L_V I h 00' og 8.04. , x ,y y: a F.F. EL,=6.21. 0 9e< 0 CONC PATIO l,' y? xy0 0y M y90 y y9 5. REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK A ~ ~V X y' y ^ ~ PINELLAS COUNTY DISK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF i )UNTY BENCHMARK AURAL A, STAMPED: AURAL A, HE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EAST END OF THE NEW .(ti yy6 X Oy 1j y y~ 6' WOOD L.V I `Y~i ~ BRIDGE JUST EAST OF CLEARWATER BEACH. ACH. ~ 1'C y .0 y9 FENCE 96 ~ Oy 0.4T'P ELEVATION = 11.82' d' y 3 VS 6• o~ 1 ° ~ 6• 6' 9 v X „ Gt ~ 0'O 11, ~ y' 6. BEARINGS ARE BASED: ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF- 2 9 ~f 6. 0 6.96' r, :ASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SKIFF POINT, SUMED. h o ~ 6x $ ~ ~ ? . BEING N75'35'09"W, PER PLAT AND ASSUMED. 0 0 1 CONC h o y ? PR 7. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE I APROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT w RANDOM x ~ QED ' PLANTER ~ PATIO LOCKS y9e tit AS SHOWN. u° & P NTERS ~ I !1T A ~ 8. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT JG EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP XCEPT AS SHOWN. 0~ y9 ^ L.V I `1'~ WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. ? S e yx '(K~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 9. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHI DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 3,0 , LOT ~ ct p ~ M ro O ~p ys1 1 6 o h y~~ Oj ~ 10. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURE .r 640 ph ~ ATIONS AND FEATURES SHOWN WERE PERFORMED IN p y. A/C ON x ~ STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDS 9,g8, X ~ CONC 0 ~ 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. M TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER )E. ' CORNER ~ ° ' „ 2)9' ~,x LOT S' 6' w ~ 11. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREI ER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE NOT FND FOP 1 60 ~ h•°A y~ y1 ~ d W ~u RE-USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOF OR .SET ~ ~0 /p 4~ ie N rY TO THE SURVEYOR. PC ~ , t ~ °0 ~ X 2.3' ~ 12. THERE MAY 8E ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICAI SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. ;RGER DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH), WERE _ \ ) a9 yN ry1,5y IcV n Op 13.ONLY TREES FOUR (4) INCHES AND LARGER DIAMETER AT E - - ~ , LOCATED AND~SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY - x _ y y ASPH ory - IVEY. - ' o r "GONG ~ 9. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND T> g'S ti ~ry F'Ai10 RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPI w y. ~ ~ Z IE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 6Q ~O, 0 ,~k 280, M y1 X 10. PARCEL IDENTIFlCATION NUMBER 08/29/15/43398/000/04f )/15/43398/000/0400 AND FCIR 5 8" FCIR 5/8° ~ k1 py y 0 ?W 6 WOOD 08/29/15/43398/000/0410; OWNER: NANCY E. & JAMES / coNC .12 a• ASPH y~ Rod FENCE , NANCY E. & JAMES 0. SCHAEFER LB 6539 ® a` ~oHW WAIk LB 6539 ~ BLOCK m c s 1ss5' ° Sj G 1 LEGEND :ND O TRAFFIC SIGNAL ACCESS BOX 1~ o TR q 0 WALL pA ~RfO 1 9 0 \ NG . OAK TREE x o SCALE O°D CL .y. a• ASPH `We E ry6 oy i' ° ~ ~ A L E 000 CLEANOUT rob ~ hR> >OyW O k. ~ a• h• 1 ® GA ON-SITE T.B.M. N0. 2 OAST. ASPHALT , gyp} / D , PINE TREE y ~ of g ® GA ® GAS METER FC.LR. 5/8° y y / Ryry BLOCK X69 ~12 PALM TREE ® GAS VALVE @ SANITARY MANHOLE LB. N0. 6539 6 70 t~ , ~9 , 12 OS SA ELEVATION = 4.06 NAND 88 y' HW f'F 13 P 01 WALL ? OTHER TREE (AS LABELED) G ~ /39 ) 'I~ 8 / BUSH O © GREASE-TRAP MANHOLE R~ yy CQ 13 ' ( ~ OE EL e< y NC 70yW1 ~j ~ `P~ ON-SIZE T.B.M. N0. 1 FND FOUND " O ELECTRIC MANHOLE b~ ~ 6~ APRON `wA g~ p,~ SEi NAIL & DISC ~ SqR SET 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD `LB 4513 Q ST QD STORM MANHOLE ® WATER VALVE \ ~ \ y~ FOP 3 4" CO " M• LB. N0. 4513 FlR FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) ® WI a .y, , / 0 7oHW 6~ FOP 3/4 ELEVATION = 5.51 NAND 88 FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) ® RE FRR FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE . \ ~ 0.05E {NO ID) / PK PARKER KAriON NAIL ® Wl ® RECLAIMED WATER VALVE , ~ 19 D.25' S BDC `~AS~ ey a CORNER FcM FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT {SIZE NOTED) ® RE ® WATER METER BOX TED) ® RECLAIMED WATER METER BOX ~ ~j~~(NO ID) e~ ry' NOT FND **''((1 FOP FOUND OPEN-ENDED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) o (BASIS OF BEARINGS) il~/ !!ccvv p \ ~ OR SET O FPP FOUND PINCHED-TOP IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) pa IRI NOTED)) IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE P/ FN&D FOUND NAIL & BRASS DISK ,fix FlI ' 1' 1•~ S &D S ~ort1 \ S 1 ry IP/ ~P N ET NAIL IN BRASS DISC "LB 4513" O or FIRE HYDRANT 7¢[ LIGHT POLE kIF ° ~6 ~ ~ K. se ~ ul \ ~i y. y 0 o S P PLS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR A~ \Ppl 66 ~ 0 ~,yy N6 ~ / LB LICENSED BUSINESS I71 Wf f71 WOOD UTILITY POLE SPHA \1 PT ry 'h• 'h• ~ ~ P PLAT Qj C( ~ T ~ \ ~ /~c D DESCRIPTION T Qf CONC UTILITY POLE Q TELEPHONE BOX ' \ ` \ yp / ~ F FlELD MEASURED ® CABLE TV BOX \ CURB INLET / ~ ? PG PAGE AL RECORDS (BOOK) ® ~I \ ~ \ / J PB PLAT BOOK 4 gp SIGN • SPRINKLER HEAD cp CALCULATED FROM PLAT CALLS o"D RC DESCRIPTION: cf CALCULATED FROM FlELO SURVEY aRD ROOF DRAIN POB POINT OF BEGINNING ~ ~ 4 LANDSCAPING LIGHT GUY GUIDE WIRE LOTS 40 & 41 OF (LAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER - Poc POINT OF COMMENCEMENT GUY GU P.U. PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT R/Vl RI( UNIT 5-A AS PER MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ~ ~ D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT cE; R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY IN PLAT BOOK 60 PAGE 51 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS MH MANHOLE E P ED EL. ELEVATION BOC BA q CENTERLINE E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. N ~ INV. INVERT HWY HK '0 ~ LO.P. TOP OF PIPE BLVD BO BOC BACK OF CURB HWY HIGHWAY UG UNDERGROUND • ` U.D. UNDERDRAIN CONC CO BLVD BOULEVARD CONC CONCRETE ~ ~ M.E.S. MITERED ENO SECTION ASPH AS d F.E.S. FLARED END SECTION EM ELI ASPH ASPHALT EM ELECTRIC METER ~ RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CLF CH ERCP EWPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE BWF BA CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE BWF BARBED WIRE FENCE p CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE WPF WO ' CURVE TABLE ~ DIP DUCTILE 1RON PIPE A/C AIF WPF WOOD PLANK FENCE ~ ~ PVC POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE R.R. RA A/C AIR CONDITIONER R.R. RAILROAD DIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA 1 GTE GENERAL TELEPHONE AND ELECTRONICS roe To'~ CURVE R A TELE. TELEPHONE TOS T01 i TOB TOP OF BANK TO$ TOE OF SLOPE • . R~ (P} OHW OVER EAD ELECTRIC, CABLE IELENSION N0. NU C1 (F) 150.00 42.48' 42.34' S83°46'15"E 16°13'36" 60 AND~OR TELEPHONE SERNCE LINE(S) F,F. FlN I NO. NUMBER F.F. FINISH FLOOR 1 P 150.00 42.41' 42.27 S83'41'10" 8°06'0 " F,O.C. FlBER-OP11C CABLE DIA. DIE ( ~ E 1 PC POINT OF CURVATURE ID IDS , DIA. DIAMETER ID IDENTIFICATION N 4 suRVEYOR's cERTIFicATE TOPOGRAPHIC and BOUNDARY and TREE SURVEY ~ - - SUNCOAST LAND SURVEYING, Inc. o a I hereby certify that the SURVEY depicted hereon was Of - performed under my RESPONSIBLE CHARGE on the date(s) ,N 2 ' 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD shown, and meets the MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS Set 240 and 250 SKIFF POINT forth by the FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND ~ ~ OLDSMAR, FLA. 34677 SURVEYORS in Chapter 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. ~ ~ No. _ Date _ Description pursuant to Section, 47.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. NOT VALID Description B W(IliOUT THE `;NR~II~ND ORK3INAL RAISED SEAL OF i ' AFL ~ DA'L,NSED SUR~YOR AND INAPP • ~ ~ A .~,~,,.1' FOR' F.B, PGS. DRAWING# 4079.DWG Project Project No. 4079 BOUNDARY -TOPOGRAPHIC -CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT • t~~' y- : ~ ~.7'" ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING r;,;,,, t` ~ DATE OF FIELD SURVEY Checked/QC KOM Scale ] Scale 1"=20' PH. (813) 854-1342 FAX: (813) 855-6890 ' • KELLY 0.~~ cCLUNG, P.~.~.: 4032 DATE: DATE: 11 9 04 Drawn GB Date 7 Date 11 /10/04 ° I '1~•'+i .ti•' - m c TREE INVENTORY LEGEND TREE NUMBER CLEAR W ATER HARBOR , 3 ~ WATERWAY P ' w w a ( ) TREE SURVEY RATING fl-5> 1 \ S) • _C= S=SPECIMEN S3S' \ sus p9'F CZ5 .TREE TYPE /SYMBOL \ FND " ~P~ i X-CUT ~ 39 SAS r / ~FJ C ~L) ®ILI S~S~ , 4/ 6p, Op' S '75 ® TREE DBH 7 ~ tP 6Q , ~ FN&D L Y _Ide ~ OF ~ 06 ~ ILLEGIB ~ S LE TREE CANOPY/ ROOT ZONE 1~tP PC • • 1 1P 1 ~ IyiP FN&D ~j I ~tt+t~ ~p`~ ~tl ILLE I ~NP 1 PRES, ~ ~ ( G BLE ~ E 0~~ 1~ ~ FN&D • BUTLE °°~oT'~ t~"" 1 R DESIGN GROUP, INC R DD .ILLEGIBLE 4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714 ~ GPR BPS y0t'~ j E. PH 721-521-1684, FAX; 727-527-7422 5 cDff GRAPHIC SC MAIL bdgl0fampabcy,rr,com , ronepl°ne0lomp°bay,recom 3' CLF ALE 3C ALE 20 40 4 CERTIFIED ARBDRIST; CHUCK BUTLER CERT # ; FL-1235A ~ .`~1u 2D a to 26 R09 n' ( IN FEET ) ' ' 1 inch = 20 ft. 16 ft. 1 ~ GAPE NOTESr Q 1. TYPE OF SURVEY, BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE SURVE' I IPHIC & TREE SURVEY n, LOT ~ 9 O ~ 2. DATE OF SURVEY. NOVEMBER 9, 2004 3, SURVEY CREW, TOM RYAN, MIKE GROSS and SCOTT WILLIAMS O ~ 4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HER ON A E RE IN FEET AND REFER TO THE and SCOTT WILLIAMS y AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN I ~ VERTICAL DATUM DF 1988. NAVD BB ( ) LOT 38 ~ ~ 5, REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK AUF ' S \ " ' ~ PINELLAS COUNTY DISK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE 5 FF~ BRIDGE JUST EAST OF CLEARWATER BEACH, NTY BENCHMARK AURAL A, STAMPED: AURAL A, SOUTH SIDE OF THE EAST END OF THE NEW / ~ ~E " o U'( S~ 6' WOOD - :H. IJ FENCE L 0 T 4 3 ELEVATION - 11.82' 1~ GP 11' ~ PgE • ~ ~E 115 ~E s . PItJE ~ 13 Pct O~ 1'(R ~ OPR .BEARINGS ARE BASED; ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WA ;TERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SKIFF POINT, 1~E ~ „ E BEING N75'35'09"W, PER PLAT AND ASSUMED. NED. ~ a ~RP 11 7. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEM N ~~t 5 ~F~ AS SHOWN E TS HAVE BEI 20VEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT j 10• PRE S ~ -1 8. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT C EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP 5~E ~ a WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT A5 SHOW'N, 12~ P ~ PBS' LOT 42 9. THIS SURVEY =PT AS SHOWN, ' SLPSE S O 9 5 DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. (ERMINE OWNERSHIP. O P e Rp LOT ~ °i ~ O ~ 10. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES ' / i ' 6'~ STRICT ACCORDAN ~ EFF ~ 40 ~ ~ CE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARD DNS AND FEATURES SHOWN WERE PERFORMED IN TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER ~ O~ , /f ~ ~ d. 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. CORNER S S' NOT FND FOP 1° 6 LOT ~ ~ 11. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPAF I THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE TO THE SURVEYOR. OR SET O pp ~r ~ ~ ~S RE-USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR, PC G~ r ` P~ 4 I ~ ~I R 12. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY ALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. /3 ~Ff O ~ ~ - 13. ONLY TREES FOUR 4 IN ER DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH), WERE S ° LOCATED AND SHOW'N)ONCMAP AND LARGER DIAMETER AT BRE ICV ~ ~ OF SURVEY. ® ~ ~ O ~ 9. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND 7HE Y. SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL i Z ~ RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPEF RVEYOR AND MAPPER. ~ 10. PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 08/29/15/43398 000 0400 . Q " R~ - - OB/29/15/43398/OOD C410; OWNER;:.N,4NCY E. &-JAMES-O. 5/43398/000/0400 AND =Y E,_ &-JAMES -0._SCHAEFER. - ~ p p „ OP~~ ~ FCIR 5/8" FCIR 5/8 12 ?w B' wooD Y. ~ 6539 P~ ~ ~o LB 6539 POP FENDE o, 1 t. hw S7 0 ~ 5 " s~ 53 ~ 2 509n \ 1 2' LEGEND p TRAFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL ACCESS BOX ~ WA~R> >O,y ~ 0 / Q1 ~ OAK TREE x o S C ti L E ~ w t~ o cLEar, C4$> ~ © GAS A E 0C0 CLEANOUT O , PINE TREE V © GAS METER k ® GAS VALVE Z 70NW / ~9 ~ Opt;p 3 12+ PALM TREE ® CAS 1 ~ 39s ~ 3 \ 12 QS SANIT x.3,9 ~F f pJ 13 ? OTHER TREE (AS LABELED) (S SANITARY MANHOLE \ 70yw1 QJ ~ fJ 11 O BUSH © GREASE-TRAP MANHOLE w ' \ •cW l FND FOUND QE ELECT 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE QD STORM MANHOLE j I FOP 3 4" COA~> 0E~ II FI IR SET i/2" CAPPED IRON ROD "LB 4513" Q STORE, ~j,~ , ~ ~ 7p~w FOP 3/4" k0 I R FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) ® WATEF C ` ~ FCIR F N 0,05E ORNER OU D CAPPED IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) ® RECLA ® WATER VALVE \ ~ \ 0.25' S ~cn (NO ID) NOT FND FRR FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE • s> ~ / PK PARKER KAYLON NAIL Q WATEF ® RECLAIMED WATER VALVE ? WATER METER BOX ` ~ ~ (NO ID) BASIS OF BEARINGS OR SET m , / ~ FCM FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SIZE NOTED} ® RECLA \ ( ) / FOP FOUND OPEN-ENDED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) icu )D) I® RECLAIMED WATER METER BOX > IN \ h ~ pO FPP FOUND PINCHED-TOP IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) D4 IRRICA \ V r ~ , FN&D FOUND NAIL & BRASS DISK ,~t~ ~ED) M IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE tY ' ~1~ 1+/ I~P~ SN&D SET NAIL IN BRASS DI ~ or C1 FIRE 1 \ K. SP SC LB 4513" P PLS PROFESSIONAL LAND 1~ LIGHT Oor6H FIRE HYDRANT JC~( LIGHT POLE q$P~ ~Oj1V m / LB LICENSED BUSINESS SURVEYOR q(T \ 1 ~ ~ TBM T MP ~ WOOD 0 WOOD UTILITY POLE \ P PLATORARY BENCHMARK \ / ` \ / ~ D DESCRIPTION QS CONC Qf CONC UTILITY POLE \ CURB INLET / ~ F FIELD MEASURED ? TELEPI ~ \ , / ' O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS (BOOK) ® CABLE n TELEPHONE BOX © CABLE TV BOX y \ PG PACE SIGN DESCRIPTION; f PB PLAT BOOK SPRIN4 SIGN \ cp. CALCULATED FROM PLAT CALLS oP° ROOF t cf CALCULATED FROM FIELD SURVEY • SPRINKLER HEAD OR' ROOF DRAIN L S 40 & 41 OF ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER Poe POINT OF BEGINNING 4c LaNDs -UNIT 5 A AS PER MAP OR PLAT THEREOF r Poc POINT OF COMMENCEMENT GUY GUIDE 4 LANDSCAPING LIGHT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 51 OF THE 'A P.u. Puauc unuTlES EASEMENT R/w RIGHT- GUY GUIDE WIRE R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY ~ D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT CL CENTEF r PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. MH MANHOLE w r7 ~iP ~ EL, ELEVATION E/P EDGE Q CENTERLINE E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT E - ~ ~ INV. INVERT ~ BOC BACK I a yl ~ T,O,P. TOP OF PIPE HWl' HIGHWA BOC BACK OF CURB HWY HIGHWAY w `p UG UNDERGROUND BLVD BOULEI BLVD BOULEVARD In ~ U.D. UNDERDRAIN CONC CONCRI ~ M.E.S. MITERED END SECTION ASPH ASPHAI CONC CONCRETE ASPH ASPHALT F.E.S. FLARED END SECTION EM ELECTR ~ RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CLF CHAIN EM ELECTRIC METER CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE i CURVE TABLE 9 ERGP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE BWF BARBEL N , CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE WPF WOOD I BWF BARBED WIRE FENCE WPF WOOD PLANK FENCE r CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE A/C AIR CO DELTA 1 PVC POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE R.R. RAILRO A/C AIR CONDITIONER R. R. RAILROAD C1 (F) 150.00' 42,48' 42.34' S83'46'15'E 16'13'36" GTE GENERAL TELEPHONE AND ELECTRONICS TOB TOP Of TELE. TELEPHONE TOS i0E OF TOB TOP OF BANK is TOS TOE OF SLOPE C1 P 150.00 42.41' ~ OHW OVERHEAD ELECTRIC, CABLE TELEVISION N0, NUM8E1 ( 42,27 S83 41 10 E 8 O6 O1 AND OR TELEPHONE RVI NO. NUMBER 0 s F.O.C. FIBER-OP11C SE CE LINE(S) F.f. FINISH CABLE DIA, DIAMET ~ PC POINT OF CURVATURE ID IDENTIF F.F. FINISH FLOOR DIA, DIAMETER Y li ID IDENTIFICATION t SUNCOAST LAND SURV SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ~ 4 EYING Inc. ~ TOPOGRAPHIC and ®O UNDARY and TREE SURVEY ~ ~ I hereby certliy that the SURVEY depicted hereon wos ~ 3 of 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEV performed under my RESPONSIBLE CHARGE on the date(s) ARD shown, and meets the MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS set ~ F'' 2 forth by the FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND 240 and 250 SKIFF POINT " > V i'"" N 1 8 31 06 UP DATE i OLDSMAR, FLA, 34677 9 SURVEYORS in Chopter 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE JP DATE JEP pursuant to Section 472,027, FLORIDA STATUTES, 'Nor vA ~ .CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ No, Da e LJD i Description WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED 8EAL OF 7escription By , Q A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER'. B BOUNDAR - - Y TOPO ,r GRAPHIC CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT FORS ~ F,B. PGS. - t DRAWING 4079.DWG ~ Pro•ect N # 1 t; ;7 NORTI-GSIDE ENGINEERING DAT rc.Project No. 4079 PH. (813) 854 1342. FAX. 813 855-6890 ~ E OF FIELD SURVEY ;Checked/QC KOM Scale 3 A' ( / Scale 1 "=20' KELLY 0. McCLUNG, P•L.S• #4032 DATE: ~ DATE: 11 9 04 Drawn GB Date Date 11 /10/04 ~i • • - CLEARWATER HARBOR ~ WATERWAY P ~ 1 ( ) S)5, , 3 , S~ 0 5pg, ~ ~ v ~ ~ 534 E ~p ~ so. 34% ~ • x (p~ 3 9 ~ x "r ,9•~ ~a S~So 9 E BOAT 1.2 WIDE S • ~ ~ 4/;30„ B~ p0' DAVIT SEAWALL CAP L ro bry k ~ :PC F p WOOD i ,y A ~ a ~ry ye oa ('p FN&D S s y, Fx x x ` ~ ? g• 6 ,~e° y~ i 06 ~ DOCK ILLEGIBLE k m s o d - k \ 4 k~ 13 1 •5• o° ,ego i' INV. -1.04' eti 9~ IP ~ N '.6 "Y y. 7 9 / _ ye ' k \ x hk Z h, !p ry F kryM k,0 3 °Y l' ' Ap 6° k / ~ ~ + 8(O v 80.34.92 ( ~8 k• 19 Q ~ yeti cks 0 ~ _ ~ a ro`~ .47' CHO CV1p89 ~ k. 1 R k ° h ~~pR ~ _ ~ kx ~ w FN&D y k 1p.D • ~oN ~ o 9 0 a ILLEGIBLE GRAPHIC SCALE x ")t~ 2 C 10 ~UO ~ k~ , y1y1 a 3' CLF 4 a SCALE y69 0g g' 132, S.z N h ¢ X h ~ y ~ y 20 0 10 20 a v ~ ° FOOD - ,o 20 40 T$ 6' 6p° y1 h A~X 2 h ~ 9• ¢ ~ O g a 2s.sr z1.8' r xry~ b - ~ ~ yx + M (W FEET ) ^ 3 STORY x°" yro oti ~ oe BRICK 1 inch = 20 ft. T ) j MASONRY x ~ 1-STORY xo• e• 1 '.0 ft. BLDG. MASONRY ry A ~ Q PLANTER ' I BLDG. o" BRICK 4 c, NOTES 1 ~ yge #240 +r PAi10 ~ 5.21' 1. TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC do TREE SURV ~ _ ~ o METAL 2APHIC & TREE SURVEY F.F. EL.-6.22' 1z4 10. 2 DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 19, 2006. S, and SCOTT WILLIAMS. U U ~ SHED 3. SURVEY CREW: TOM RYAN, MIKE GROSS, and SCOTT WIWAE ~ LOT 39 0 ~ ~ z ~ 1-STORY _T AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN I ~ ~ m U ~ MASONRY SHF~ . 0 4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO TH U 6,0~ = 5.99' VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988. (NAND 88) s BLDG. I Q p a _ ~9 LOT 38 ^ h9 qy 26.p4, #250 ~ I e°~ 5. REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK A~ )UNTY BENCHMARK AURAL A. STAMPED: AURAL A. ~ x y ~ h' F.F. EL.=6.21 ea e0 ~ e• PINELLAS COUNTY DISK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TI ' i ~rA b h' g9 BRIDGE JUST EAST OF CLEARWATER BEACH. HE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EAST END OF THE NEW 4CH. ~ / ~ \ x ~x f ERp ~ u +r 1 j s 6 fF~ ~ 6' WOOD LOT 4 3 ELEVATION = 11.82' I ge°` ~ ` ~ 1 ~U ~ 6oti •0 5 ~E a CONC h FENCE x ~ h~j 5U PATIO 59 ~ i Q= ~ ~ ~ 0.4T a 6. BEARINGS. ARE BASED: ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-I ASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SKIFF POINT, x~ I W I 3 0° N . 3 0° o' o e•1 2-STORY ~ BEING N75'35'09°W, PER PLAT AND ASSUMED. 'UMED. I 1 Q ~1 ~ 9~ / ~ ~ o. rT.o' s. MASONRY ~ n / y h o o. ox ~ .0 7. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE E • 1, 12 ~ CONC ~ ~ of v b1 ERP BLDG. AS SHOWN. 1PROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT ~ LAN ~ ~ RANDOM x 1, FFL ~ ~R_ ~ ~ e° f`~ o o, 8. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHI IG EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP ~ ~ I ~ PATIO, COCKS 5' DSO x ~ x WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. (CEPT AS SHOWN. I ~ ~9 a v & P NTERS ~ 5 b~ ~ ~ ~ m 1 oq ~ 9 LOT 42 9. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHII TREE DRIPUNE~ 00 ~ 'r i ? 5 ~ h• Q. )ETERMINE OWNERSHIP. ' 12 `Jx '(RU 3 ~ ~ Cf) 10. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ElEVA710NS AND FEATURE 3,~ , ~ LOT Gi ~ v h O d. STRICT ACCORDANCE Vd1H THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDA 0 ~p ~ ~ e~ \ 6 1 ~ a h h` ~ 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. kTIONS AND FEATURES SHOWN WERE PERFORMED IN A TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER ~ / v 5 e~ 4-O v h A/C ON )E. I " 99 ' x`~ a CONC x ~ 11. USE OF.THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREP RE-USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO 1HE SURVEYOR I CORNER 6 p w \ .R THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE Y TO THE SURVEYOR. ~ zz9' ~x LOT ~ w ~ NOT FND FOP 1" 6p p p, y1 ~ o ~ ' 12. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICAL OR SET- _ , h~ 6O _ ~p~ - - - _ . - - 41 -g=- - - - . - Q ^ ? _ - _ ` _ - - -_O ----Ar B SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. PC ~ x°r • • /,3~ ~ ~ " ~ x 2.3 ~ ~ ~ ~FJ 13. ONLY TREES FOUR 4 INCHES AND LARGER DIAMETER' J , g. o f~~y P ^ °r o 'e` 1'(R xo' LOCATED AND SfiOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. RGER DIAMETER'AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH), WERE 'VEY. \ ~6 k°^ ry h~'l E~ °~6~~ cV T" : ~ ~ G xo 9. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND TF • x . R x bpg ~FFL ASPH yo ~ ui Fri- ~ °O6y E SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL ? ~ ~ yo ~ y.~ ~ RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPf ~ o BACK o~ ~ 5 N FLOW ~ro CONC F ti x5• 10. PARCEL IDENTIFlCATION NUMBER 08/29/15/43398/000/040 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 6 a PREVENTER e n PAT10 COp1C~ 06/29/15/43398/000/0410; OWNER: NANCY E. & JAMES 1/15/43398/000/0400 AND NANCY E. & JAMES 0. SC14AEFER k~5 FCIR 5 8° ~ pp,/ o 280' ~x h ary ~t o° ~ (p k1 W +r NP p1 ~ FCIR 5 8° o ? , p5p ~ \ ~ ~ G ~ o,, LB 6539 J ~ 0 ~ coNC W LB 6539 12 ASPH o, epos 1s.s'S' y p~K1t, ~\P a~ ~ ~ k' ~OHLy ~ ~ BLOCK ro C 1 16 5753 ~ k~ WALL o; pO~RFD 12 h~h°e 1~ LEGEND o TR. ND W TRAFFIC SIGNAL ACCESS BOX ~ ~ 509„ \ ~KWG ~ OAK TREE N 0 SCALE pll ' 6 CIg~( bEh "r° a• ASPH ~WA>ra> ~o kry p ~ ~ ko ~h X12 A L E 0CO CLEANOUT © GAS METER I y s ~ x ON-SITE T.B.M. N0. 2 ~ ~O'~~ Hworo ASPHALT x , gyp) ~ ~ , PINE TREE © GA ~ ~ ~ m g ® GA + ~ ~ ~ ~ FCIR 5/8° P•5' S(q °i• ~ ky BLOCK 168 X12 PALId TREE ® GAS VALVE 0// ¢ LB N0. 6539 3 NT CH )pH / ~9 , WALL o~ 12 OS SAS ''ll ~ ~ ELEVATION = 4.06 NAND 88 ~ R9 Iv d9 9 , ,`3 1 w~ ? OTHER TREE (AS LABELED) GRI QS SANITARY MANHOLE © GREASE-TRAP MANHOLE i ~ ~ 0 1`39 P a° 13 ~ d' ~ BUSH poll ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ CO ~3~ / .~y, ' 71 7 ~ Q ELI Q ELECTRIC MANHOLE ~ ro" ^r "r N(,` ~OHwf O) ~IIE' ,>(p) x FND FOUND ° SANITARY MH ~ ~ ~ ti. ApRpN °WA ye 5 SCIR SET 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD "LB 4513 ~ STI QD STORM MANHOLE \ ~ e• ~ ~ ~ ~ FlR FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) ® WA RIM=5.31' ~ ~ \ FOP 3/4' coo ~ 6~ FOP 3 4" y FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD SIZE NOTED WATER VALVE ® RECLAIMED WATER VALVE INV. NW =1.02 ~ ~ a OHW ~ ro• FRR FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE ( ) ® REi ) ~ ~ \ 0.05' E N0. ID FND NAIL INV. W)=0.96' ~ ~ ` g BoC °c ~ I ) FND X CUT / PK PARKER KAYLON NAIL © WA ?W WATER METER BOX INV. SW =0.96' ~ ~ ~ ^ ~9 0.25 S AS, ~ ~ ASPHALT"r~ ~ e FCM FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SIZE NOTED) ® REi ) ~ ~ ~•L, (NO ID) BASIS OF BEARINGS FAA ro '.V,AY N9'~ry ? 1 ~ / FOP FOUND OPEN-ENDED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) ~ rED) 0 RECLAIMED WATER METER BOX TOTED) wv INV. S =1.07 ~ o ( ) 6"CLAY IN/ FPP FOUND PINCHED-TOP IRON PIPE SIZE NOTED D4 IRF INV.(E)=0.83 \ ~ ,S'kj ,y. h r1 FN&D FOUND NAIL & BRASS DISK ~ar~• FlR VOTED) D4 IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE ore FIRE HYDRANT ~ \ 01 q'h ~ ro °9 oh 1~• ~1P SN&D SET NAIL IN BRASS DISC "LB 4513° ~ ~ ~ N h >oe\ N'~ rn ~ K/ SP PLS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~ LIG I \ \ ~ \ A 66 ry S \ O y. ~ P X][ LIGHT POLE 6° p~ ~ ' \ASp CI~I• v ti \ ° / LB LICENSED BUSINESS flI WO I PC ~ ON, HACT ~ \ 24 ~ TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 2 ~ SY \ R 0 WOOD UTILITY POLE >4,8 ~ poNC N T,B.M \ ' ~ P PLAT Qj CO \ • 0{y~ All TN N0. E \ 1 ° %C ~ D DESCRIPTION ~ 0 CONC UTILITY POLE Q TELEPHONE BOX . ~ F(F p0 o a e ~ ~ F FlELD MEASURED ' ~ ~ VgpON(f \x~ ~ / \ T Dry O.R. OFFlCIAL RECORDS (BOOK) ® CA' ® CABLE TV BOX ~ 4'66 N a CURB INLET \ro~ ro PG PAGE SIG ~ ~ ~ 1.5~ S AVp 86 a\ ~ - PB PLAT BOOK SPI SIGN • SPRINKLER HEAD DESCRIPTION: ~ ~ ~ ANT cURe . TOP-3.32 ti ~f CALCULATED FROM FlLAT CALLS oRD Roy ~ ~ THROAT-2.57' h ~ s~RV~' aRD ROOF DRAIN • \ ~ ~ 9" e~ ~ INV.(N)= -0.71' N POB POINT OF BEGINNING ~ LAI LOTS 40 & 41 OF ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER ~ ro ~ v POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT GUY GUII 4 LANDSCAPING LIGHT GUY GUIDE WIRE - UNIT 5-A AS PER MAP OR PLAT THEREOF ~ ~ ~ ~ INV.(SE)= -0.62' P.U. PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT R/W Rlcl R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY CL CENTERLINE N RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 51 OF THE ~ ~ "~`Nati ti INV.(SW)- -0.74 • CURB INLET D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ crr w PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~ ~ INV. E)=0.27' ~ ~ TOP=3.27' MH MANHOLE E/P ED( E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT ~ \ ~ - ' N THROAT=2.51' EL ELEVATION BOC BAf e \ ~ INV. W)-0.49 INV. INVERT HWY HIG ~ ~ , qA'~ / INV. NW =0.15' T.O.P. TOP OF PIPE BOC BACK OF CURB HWY HIGHWAY m ~ gi i 1 Q ( ) BLVD BOl I M ~ ~ a9 r INV.(S)-0.66' UG UNDERGROUND CONC COP BLVD BOULEVARD CONC CONCRETE N s N U.D. UNDERDRAIN ASPH ASf CURB INLET ~ M.E.S. MITERED END SECTION , ~ F.E.S. FLARED END SECTION EM ELE ASPH ASPHALT EM ELECTRIC METER I ~ TOP=3.33 ~ RCP RFJNFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CLF CHI i ~ - ~ THROAT=2.58' ~ `1 ~ ~ ERCP EWPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 8WF BAf CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE BWF BARBED WIRE FENCE o ~ ~ ~ CURVE TABLE INV.= -0.21' ~r `CD ~ ~ CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE WPF WOI O - ~ ® 1 q S T o~ DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE A C AIR WPF WOOD PLANK FENCE A/C AIR CONDITIONER o m~ G m~ ~ y `7~ / u~ ~ - CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA SANITARY MH 1`° ~,,Id Pvc POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE R.R. RA1 ® 1 gyp) GTE GENERAL TELEPHONE AND ELECTRONICS TOB TOF R.R. RAILROAD n a r ® ~ - , , , „ , » _ ` W TELEI TELEPHONE TOS TOE TOB TOP OF BANK TOS TOE OF SLOPE a m C1 (F) 150.00 42.48 42.34 S83°4615 E 16°13 36 RIM-3.57 so RI oHW OVERHEAD ELECTRIC, CABLE TELEVISION NO. NUI "C~ IV ~ , ~ „ ~ INV. W)- -0.25' AND OR TELEPHONE SERNCE IJNE S o ~ $a o ® / O F.F. FlNI ~ ~ C1 (P) 150.00 42.41 42.27 S83°41 10 E 8°06 01 INV. NE)= -0.35 ~ EO.C. FlBER-OPTIC CABLE DIA. DIA NO. NUMBER F.F. FINISH FLOOR o ~ ~ INN, -0.11' t ~ PC POINT OF CURVATURE ID IDEI DIA. DIAMETER ID IDENTIFICATION ~'t~ m I 0/ rn 4 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TOPOGRAPHIC and BOUNDARY and TREE SURVEY ~ SUNCOAST LAND SURVEYING, Inc. 0 3 _ i erfermed uedreif that the, ;SURVEY depicted hereon was Of - o y n rym ,'RE$1;, NSIQLE., CHARGE on the dates •y1 2 10 6 06 UP DATE P Y ,,y~ , 4 O _ ~ UP DATE SHN 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD shown, and meets~•,~~y#ite. MI~1(~if~yi ,•,,TECHNICAL STANDARDS set 240 and 250 SKIFF POINT 1 8 3 O6 UP DATE JEP forth by the ,,FL,i IDS ~ + A~D'~~''OF PROFESSIONAL LAND ~ 1/ UP DATE su ' ha ' '+~iG7 ' ' OLDSMAR, FLA. 34677 RVEYORS, m ~ pt, . , , ~ CORIDA~ ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ No. Date Description Description By pursuant ta', Sec}}ibMl~ ,~~D27,''~L~ I[~p 'STATUTES. 'NOT VALID 7 •n,P 9 r ~1: WITHOUT ~ , TUI~E•?AIVD QR~NAL RAISED 8EAL OF A FL A I:I RVFI;OR ~1ND MAPPER'. n 1 ~a~:, FOR: _ DRAWING# 407902.dwg Pro'ect U - - 0 5 UC 0 ;;,ti ~±},r, F.B. PGS. 43 45 1 BO NDARY TOPOGRAPHIC C N TR TION STAKE UT ,n-;;;,,;:. Project No. 4079.02 ~ ~ I ~ . ~ ~ • ~ NORTI-Q.~IDE ENGINEERING 1•'~ ; , ,w I,• Z ~ DATE OF FIELD SURVEY Checked/QC KOM Scale ] Scale 1"=20' • PH: (813) 854-1342 FAX: (813) 855-6890 ~ 0 19 06 I KE Y o. MccLUN~,~•~,~.5~>p#~•tt33 DATE, DATE: 1 Drawn GB, SHN Date ~f X97°Y ITr Date 10/9/06 d