The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-08047 ,. 0 LL /'_' ,. .... ~w - U Planning Department 100 South. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION I~SUBMiT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded mto sets ® SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 00. I , ~.o.~, CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL RECENE[~ OCT 12 2['06 PLANNING ~ NOTE: 95 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION RI=QUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) '. ti FLEXIBLE' DEVELOPMENT .APPLICATION.. . Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/2812006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PRO! APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL. ovmers on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER 'ERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202,A) +c ~I/ENtI~ ANC. - . c. at[. Gv ~ ~ 3 020 .r ~ - 3 CELL NUMBER - ~- S ~C-G/ V ~ ~• ~~ ~-G J oc~ ooa W tL a L 0 .~ 3 FAX NUMBER:. •- 23- ...: ~ 5 )= MAIL ADDRESS:. (~' ~, 3 )/~ {~~, B, PROPOSED DI PROJECT NAME: STREETADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Spec~ically idenfify the request Include number of units or square footage ofnon-residential use and all requested code deviations; e:g. reduction in required number of ~ parking spaces, specific use, etc.) INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) ~O~~E , ROJECT VALUATION:: . U. 6 - ~- PARCEL SIZE (square feet):. ~73 s L D~s~~.~s~P~. -rf (~(~ ``J a I Page 1 of 8 Kt~;tlVtt~ OCT 12 2006 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Parcel 1 (No. 19-29-1 G-00000-110-Q500) That part of the Northeast'/ of the Northeast'/< of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, described as follows: From the Northeast comer of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 18 East, run N88°5T02"W, along the North line of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"V1(, along the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 1.9, 609.8 feet for a Pvint of Beginning, said point being on the South right of-way line of Tropic Hills Drive as shown on the plat of TROPIC HILLS UNiT ONE, as .recorded imPlat Book 57, Page 41, Pinellas County Records; thence continue S00°52'25"W, 295.00 feet: thence N89°13'12"V1/; 330.00 feet to the East boundary of Block A, TROPIC HILLS UNIT ONE.; thence N00°52'25"E, 315.00 feet to the South boundary of Tropic Hills Drive by the following two courses: S44°1D'24"E, 28.26.feet; thence S89.°13'12"E, 310.00 feet.to the Point of Beginning,. Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 2 (No.19-29-16-00000-110-0600) The South 435 feet of the following description, less the South 36a feet thereof: From the Northeast comer of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run N88°57"02" IN, along the North Line of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to the West right of-way of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"VI/, along the West right-of-way line of U_S. Highway 19, 609.8 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence continue along said .right=of- way line S00°52'25"W, 730.00 feet to the,forty acre line ;thence N89°13'12"W, .along said forty acre Line 330 feet;. thence run N00°52'25"E, 750 feet; thence run S44°10'24"E, 28.26 feet thence S89°13'12"E, 310 feet to the Point Of Beginning, Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 3 (No.19-29-16-00000-110-0610) The South 365 feet of the following description, less the South 235 feet thereof: From the Northeast comer of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run N88°5T02"W, along the North line of said Section 19, 100.00-feet to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52`25"W, along the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, 609.8 feet for a Poinf of Beginning; thence continue along said right-of-way line S00°52'25"V11, 730.00 feet to the forty acre line: thence N89°'13"12W, along said forty acre line 330 feet; thence run N00°52'25"E, 750 feet; thence run S44°10"24 E, 28.26 feet; thence S89°13'12"E, 310 feet to the Point Of Beginning, Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 4 (No.19-29-16-46388-000-0010) The South 235 feet of the following: From the Northeast comer of Section 19, Township. 29 South,. Range 16 East, .run N88°5T02"W, along the. North fine of said Section 19, 100.00 feet. to the. West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"W, along the West right of--way line of U.S. Highway 19,.609.8 feet for a Point Of Beginning; thence continue along.said right-of--way line S00°52'25"V1f, 730.00 feet to the forty .acre line; thence N89°13'12"V1/;-along said forty acre fine 330 . feet; thence run N00°52'25"E, 750 feet; thence run S44°10'24"E, 28.26 feet; thence S89°13'12"E, 310 feet to the _ . Point Of Beginning; also being described as Lot '1, KENYON DODGE; according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 92, Page.59 of the Public Records Of.Pinellas County, Florida: Parcel 5 (No. 19-29-16-00000-140-0100) The North 330.00 feet of the Southeast'/ of the Northeast'/ of Section 19, Township 29 South,.Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the Easterly 100.00 feet thereof for right-of-way of U.S: Highway 19; ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT Florida Power Corporation right-of-way over the Westerly portion thereof as recorded in O.R. Book 1416, Page 182 of the Public Records of Pinellas County ,Florida, also otherwise described as: the Easterly 1104.1 feet of the Northerly 330:00 feet of the said Southeast'/< of the Northeast'/ ,LESS the Easterly 100 feet thereof for right-of-way of U.S. Highway 19; TOGETHER WITH anon-executive easement in favor of Thayer Motor Company, lnc. and Charlie- Harris Pontiac, ..Inc., for ingress and egress by way of a 30.00 foot easement between the above-described.premises and Ham Boulevard, Recorded in O.R. Book 2787, Page 632 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 6 (No.19-29-16-92322-001-0071) The East 50 feet of Lot 7, Block A TROPIC H1LLS UNIT 1, according to the plat thereof as Recorded in Plat Book 57, Page 41, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ~ ~ DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNTI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLANT YES _ NO a (ifyes, attach a copy of the appiic~ble documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A OJPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING: OWNERSHIP (see Page ~ D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-993.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the sa (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- E~iain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony With the scale, bulk, coverage, density and characterofi adjacent properties in which ~ is located. S~~ f~7'~~Gfl+~d 2. The.proposed development vvll not hinder or discourage the appropriate:.develppment and use ofi adjacent land and buiid'mgs.or significantly impair the value thereof. - S>GfC 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety ofi persons residing or working in the neighbofiood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minim¢e.traffic congestion. S~ ,~-7Tr4~-~tL~~ 5. The piaposed development is consistent with the cdmmunitiy character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel ,proposed for development.. :. S~G / / I~~I~.lJ . .. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, induding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours.of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~~~ ~~~ 7ttl~l~1 ATY~~ RECENED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 8 ~ ~ Responses to: GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA (Revised 10-11-06) 1. This project consists of the exterior rerrodeling of an existing structure. Size and scale of all exterior buildings remain fie same. Existing dealerships to the north and south of the property are both a bit larger in scale than existing conditions. We have added a new entry feature to the existing showroom in an attempt to equalize the scale of showrooms to the north and south. The bulk of the structure is being increased to better reflect the buk of buildings to the north and south. Coverage and density remain the same. When compared to adjacent properties they all appear very similar. Currently the character of the property is outdated. The proposed remodeling enhances the character of this dealership, modernizing its exterior appearance to reflect the more modern designs of the dealerships to the north and south. 2. All surrounding property has been fully devebped. Improvements as a result of this project will only enhance their value. 3. The health and safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood will not be affected by the proposed project as we are improving existing buildings and site conditions. 4. The proposed project identifies one building to be removed and all proposed work being conducted within property. No traffic pattern accessing the site will be altered. Currently all entrances are being used for there intended use and are to remain. The southern most entry allows access to the service drive. The next entrance to the north is used for new car sales customer parking. The next entrance accommodates used car parking. The northern most entry, is for access to administrative offices. A~ traffic will continue to exit the property right turn only along US 19. Therefore issues with traffic congestion do not apply. 5. The proposed improvement to the site includes upgrading all landscape to comply with current code. Minor reductions in landscape are being requested along South landscape buffer adjacent to the existing service drive and the North landscape buffer along entire north parking area in an effort not to reduce existing parking areas. Showroom building will receive architec#ural improvements to modernize the facade similar to properties to the northand south. Proposed paint color scheme will match existing. The proposed project will be consistent with community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The proposed modification to the existing property will not have adverse effects or impacts as this is an existing business, currently operating at this IocatioOr~IGINA! RECEIVED Ot;T 12 2[~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infifl Redevelopment Project Criteria) ^ ~ Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE WFlLL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA-Explain Taw each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or developmenrt standards set forth in this zoning dstrict 2. The development or redevelopment will- be consis#ent with -the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan;.as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with.the intent and purpose of this zoning district - ~Si~~ 3, The development or redevelopment wilt not impede the normal and orderly development and improvemenfiof surrounding properties. s~~ ?'~~ ~~~ ORIGINAL. .. RECEIVE® 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development ~ ~~ 12 Z~~6 ~~' ~-~~. ~~~ PLANNING DEPARTMEN T t; K 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by 'the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, vinll not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more ofi the fiollowing objectives: a.. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contrbutor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, . d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is character¢ed by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use orzoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of.a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. - - ~~~ ~~ aG_.lJ . 6., Flextb8itywith regard to. use, lotwidth, required setbacks, height and off~treet parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance vvith all of: the following design objectives: ` a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character'of an area; . d. 'In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, theproposed°development incorporates a substantial number ofi the following design elements: ^ .Changes in hor¢ontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, .balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Build'mg stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffiers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buldings. Page 3 of 8 Responses to: COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (Revised 10-11-06) This submission represents the remodeling of an existing car showroom building in excess of 25% value. As a result, we are submitting plans to bring a total of six parcels, under unity of title into compliance with currentcodes. To that end we are requesting one variance relating to landscape buffers in 2 locations and one variance relating to building height. The request for variance in landscape bufferwidth reduction along the south portion of the site adjacent to the existing service drive is requested to allow the proper operation of service drive activity. Without this variance existing service function would not operate properly. The buffer reduction along the North side is requested so that the entire North parking area need not be reconstructed. The request for building height variance is to bring the scale and bulk of the main building in harmony with the adjacent properties and to identify the Dodge brand. 2. The proposed project has been designed to comply with all existing zoning and future land use issues, landscape, lighting, site drainage, etc. Except as noted bellow: South landscape buffer along a portion of thesite adjacent to the existing service drive to allow the proper operation of service drive activity. North landscape buffer along entire north parking area to avoid reducing existing parking Height of building at proposed entrance feature exceeds maximum height allowed 3. The proposed modification to existing site and showroom building will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. All work is contained within the site limits and no work is planned to existing egress/ ingress points. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed project. In fact, adjacent properties will beenhanced by improvements and construction of landscape buffers, added trees & shrubs. 5. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard and flexible development use. The project proposed involves the remodeling of an existing showroom building and site plan upgrades to comply with existing requirements. 6. The proposed modifications to existing showroom building provide changes in horizontal building plans, architectural details, variety of colors and finishes, building step backs, etc. All buffers have been met except as noted below: South landscape buffer along a portion of thesite adjacent to the existing service drive to allow the proper operation of service drive activity. North landscape buffer along entire north parking area to avoid reducin~R~~s~~ng parking RECEIVE® Existing buildings are to remain Required distances do not apply. G;, i 12 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER E, STORMWATER PLAN Manua{ and 4202.A.21) ENTS; (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria ^ A STORMWATER NARRATNE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS.. Alf applications that involve add'fion or modfication of impervious surface, incuding buildings, must incude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption th this requirement ^ If a plan ks not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ F~dsting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; O All adjacent streets and,municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stomrnrater detentioNretention areaincluding top of bank, the of slope and outlet control structiae;: ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan inGtiding all calculations and data necessary. to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ... ^ Proposed stormwater detentioNretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer nn all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT .INQUIRY 'LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT. DISTRICT (SWFWMD): PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SINFWMD approval is required pnorto issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initiaLone ofthe following): Stomiwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS 1N THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Code Section 4202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (knGud'mg legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; I~ TREE SURVEY (including existing #rees on site and within 25' of She adjacent site, by species, size (DBH ~' or greater), and location, . /including drip sines and indicating tn+es th be removed) -please design around the existing trees;. O TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a °certfied arbonst°, of all trees 8° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip i'mes) and condition of uch trees; ~OCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; . ^ PARIUNG DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviatiiinS to the parking standards (e.•f2educe number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in acxordance with accepfed traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study vvll be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; . ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence ofrecording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT,. as applicable;- ORIGINAL RECEIVE QCT 12 2[~~6 Page 4 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER G. S TE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) 51TE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24' x 36~: Index sheet referencing ind'nridual sheets included in package; _ North arrow; Engineering-bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; - Footprint and size of all EXISTING buldings and structures; Footprint. and size ofi all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks, All existing and proposed poirrts of access; _ All required sight triangles; - Identification of environmentalty unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground covervegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all publicand private easements; ,. Location of all streetrights-ref-waywithin and adjacenftothesite;' Location of existing public and private utilities, kncluding fire hydrants, storm and san~ary sewer lines, manholes and lift.stations, gas' and water tines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and veiticular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stomwvater management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks: SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabularform: EXISTING _ Land area in square feet and acxes; _ Number of k~CISTING dwelling un'~ts; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; REQUIRED PROPOSED - Parking spaces: total number; presented in tabular form with the .. ~~~ 5~~~~ !J number ofrequired spaces;.. • Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways; expressed in square feet .~ percentage of the paved vehia~lar area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utrlity easement; - Building and structure heights; ~ - - Impermeable surFaceratio (l:S.Rj; and _ - .: . ~~~ Floor area ratio (F.A.R) for-all nonreskdential uses: ~ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVH~ ONE ACRE, provide the following addth'onal information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater managementfor the parcel; AIF operi space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and buiding lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and struchrral setbacks (dimensioned); Structural ovefiangs; ORIGINAL RECENED~ OCT 12 2[06 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE~ Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed strucivres; _ Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and. retention areas incuding swales, side slopes and bottom elevations, Delineation and dimensions of alt required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sightvisibifitytriangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas incuding landscaping islands and curbing; . Existing trees on~ite and immediately adjacent to the site,'by species, s¢e and locations, including dripGnes (as indicated on regr~tred .. _ tree surveY); Location, s¢e, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating. to. the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, speafications; quantities; and spacing requiremerrts of all . . _ existing and proposed.landscape.materials, including botanical acid common names; Typical planting details for frees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, :backfiliing;..mulching :and _ .protective measures;. Interior landscaping-areas hatched and/or shaded and. labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both-square feet and _ pefcentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes: - /REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); qV COMPREHENSNE .LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as, applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requiremerrts to offset the areas where minimum Code will not~be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23) ~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS-with the following information; All sides of all buildings; _ Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full s¢ed set of colored elevations); Materials; ~~~ Sight visibility triangles; ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS-same as above to.scale.on 8 %X.11: J. SI.GNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS 1 Section 3-1806} ~. . All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs,•. Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether.ttrey will be removed orto remain. All PROPOSED. freestanding and attached signs; Provide. details including location, s¢e, height, colors, materials and .drawing freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced si na e ro osal 8 %z X 11 color , if submittin Com rehensive Si Program a lication. ORIGINAL 9 9 P P ( ) ( ) 9 P gn . PP RECEIVED OCT 12 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page s of 8 . CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~ K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4801.C) ~ InGude if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day, Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with flue (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous,intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the molt recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (RE) Trip General Manual. . The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Departments Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. q Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include asummarytable ofpre- and pos4developmentlevels. ofservice for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAU ION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT.FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STU AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Thewater supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ~ Acknowledgement offire flow calculationslwaterstndy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. l~'Plow CalculationsMlater study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT 'FORA FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,. APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. ~ ~ .. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M, SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and author¢e City representatives to visit and photograph the properly described in this application. Signatut'e of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom tp nd s bscribed before me this /~ day of DC 'V , A.D. 20b to me and/or by 5 ,who is rsonally known as produced as identification. '''~ TINA A. TANKOY-CARM N/ Notary pu ~ ,gyp DD51 75( M commission ex ireS: Q i os~" ~~~ Meich 03, 20 0 Y P //°~//D t.80o.3-NOTARY Fl. Notary Di6wunt ~ 12ECEIVE® Page 7 of 8 (, ~ I 12 2006 p~psN,!~ING DEPARTMENT riTV C)F CI.EARWATER N, iI~IDAVIT TD AUTEFORi~E AGENT: t, prpvk3e tterrtaa of eiF ptopady+ avunrars on dmd - PR1tJ't' Rtl- r~atrrs6: lax ~t ~e~ ~~nr~~~~ ~.~' .. _ - -- :' ~, That (! amtwe ~r•aj ttre orv~t(z) at+~ record U4a nolder(sj as'ttue idlavuinp dasaSbad ProPeit!' jaddtaas or eartara4 Ibgtiott): , . - ,~ 3~ ?hattfti9 proptrfy +wis; the prop9ttyterwhldt ~ faqu¢.gt fot ~ (cfe9ctihe requoE~1 a. ?hat the rmdersigned (tsasthr~) at~fr>ted and {doer) appeint; . as (lifsPo-eir) agen~j to exer~tr+ any pstnions a otherdocument; rrecesssry to affec! svrh peal'rorK 5. Thatthia af~dovithea bath oor~ttad to irtduoe the ~` of Clesarw~t, ~larid9 to catuai~attd aeon the aba+-e degorrbod properly; &, 7te3t~visiL to the property are n by {~}- represer~atiti-es inutlertti process this appt'ication and the ~yNtgrautho~iZAs ~Y Ttpneaer~mtisrea to visit and photOgr~ph thv proporty deecsibarl to ttu~a xpP; 7_ ?'hat fUws). fire ' Properly owner ~. Prape4y Ouvner ~OXATN BRiRA~ '~~ ~1sS~sxR~rl 5~+~'r'AR~r ...STATE OF F~ORIQAI . OOUNTY•bF PiNGir>~€ BROfn/RIg~ b~ ~a~r of 8ebee trm the utdetsigned* an tjffic~duly Cornmtssiorted the IeMrs otthe State ot~9orida~on the r~ ~"avR~'NMV P. fERRl~i }4S.S'~s~ ~ ~7~y a~ i~,•a~ perscnauy JDpA'ee2d It~SN~'e/1~ ~l~sl~a ~, ='e~__ '~-o bavirtg eeen ftlstrru}y SWOm , i`_"__- flepo~s and says drat t~Js~ef~ly urxler~ds the coe~ar>!s of the atl~la3v& that hel9~sfgned. err iur+rr~'' . tbuq!tAgle•~e1rMAph aiptarr~~rrnMrn.~s st;~ Notary Putatia Slpnatu2 s~us~p n+~r comrniss~on ~: ~°1~.z.1.tt '~4~~ .~._. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ACT 12 2[~O6 eotdly-chattho fotegotr+g to lrue 1Qard oorreot ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT p~ g Qp g - CITY OF CLEARWATER GGB ~ng~ne g, Inc. 3109 Stirling Road, Spite 201 - ` - Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312 •- ~ - Ph: (954) 956-9899 • Fax (954) 986.6655 _, . . '.. _ _ . ; ., email:ggbeng@beDsoutb.net - '~_ .. -, . ~.. _ ;. ~~_.~~ a - ,~~.i AUTOi~VAY DODGE CLEARWA'T~ 19400 US Highway 19 North CLEARWATER, FI,GRII3A S'I'ORPA'1'ER NAR~A'3'~E August 30, 2006 ORIGINAL RECENE~ OCT 12 2006 PLANNIONF C EA WA ER1 arr The existing i 3.1'7 Acre Autoway Dodge site will be augmented and enhanced by the conversion of 27,902 square feet of impervious paved surface to pervious green and Landscaped surface. Approximately, 3,809 of existing pervious surface will be converted to impervious paved surface, realizing a gain of 24,093 square feet, of pervious landscaped surfaces for the total site. • The existing site which is building and pavement intensive is being relaxed with the • addition of raised landscaped islands and green areas to soften up the massive impervious areas that now the exist. The existing pavement areas will be repaired and resurfaced as required sa that overland runo ff is directed to the internal drainage network, which wl'Il remain. where pavement low points exist without sufficient collection basins, additional catch basins and interconnected 15" HDPE piping aze being added which dischazge to an enhanced landscaped retention area. Due to the reduction of a net 24,093 square feet of impervious pavement area to pervious landscaped areas, the project rainf~ali ranoffpercentages will be decreased; the ground storage will increase and the resultant storm water flood stages will be reduced Therefore, the storm water system as exists, and as atzgme~ed, will be receiving a reduced amount o£runoff and will thus be mare efficient and operational Augmentation of the .existing drainage collection system will include, curbing azound existing inlets to assure the continuity of the existing grading network, the addition of inlets at exissting pavement Low points subject to flooding, as well as the addition of an enhanced retention and landscaped area to accept discharge from the added catch basins. A storm water pollution prevention plan will also be put into place during pavement removal and exca.V.atlon aperatiOns. . The existing drainage system, as augmented and improved, will continue to function as - _ originally designed and installed with a reduced amount of runoff contributing to the . _ ~ - system due to the conversion of existing pavement areas to landscaped and green areas: - z CNIL AND FORENSIC ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS ~t~ Lf1J l 1.1 L lr !'1 1 1 V i~ r - ;;~ ~-~ I -~ ,~~c ,~r~ Erb u E ~--- -- L1I11'If'ti~ 1' 1 111i;~ rrr,I~A X14 •G ~f I I ! Y111{~~~IY UKr'vll RECEi~ GCS 1 `~ Ll~uo t~lANN1NC~ ~cet~WA ER '~~'~~ Autoway Dodge ,~~,~ SOUTH ELEVATION ~,„ ~ - , ,, ~ ~ ,,- .w , , -. i u WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION ai:n.tE 3137` 7" r~ ~~ ~ ~.~. A f~~C AV EN U E /1(~I'~S I(li ~. ~ 1 { ~iMl)"1 •I: ~ 1 ~ •l~Ii;1~11 ORIGINAL RECEIVED OO~i 12 2Q~D6 pIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Vin` Autov+ray Dodge Clearwater Planning Departrnent ~ 00 South Myetie Avenue Cleairevater, Fioricia 33756 Telephone: 727-552~d5b7 PBX: 727-~~'~i9~ ~BMITORIGMALSIGNEDANDNOTAR® APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIESOFTHE ORIGINALAPPLICATION-Plans and . applica5an are regtnred to be cdlated, stapled and folded i nto sets CASE NUMBr~i: RECEt1rED BY{Staff ho'iials): DATE RECEIVID: 9t 1dO1'E: ATQTie+L. OF 15 SSrS OF THIS APPI:ICJ~TtOId ANG Alt StJPPORTIN6 .DOCIDIYItdTd'1'ATIOAI 1$ REGiti11REQ TO SE S~BtVIITT® ltd tOi~31361iC'fIt3lNlKi'146 A~PLE'fE LEVEI.OAIi: ~R LEVEtTYd.O ~LICATtON. (Revisl~ O3/29/2U©~ ~'I.E T'~'P°E Q-R P~N'~~ APPLICANT, PRElPERTY OWNER ANi:9 AGENT 1NP®R-R~/IJ-~-TIOId: dCode Sec~i®n ~-202.4} ,4PPLICAN'i' N,MAE: C /~NUC eL-N C MAIEJNGADDRESS: _ (,(, ~i(, I~ L~/~ . GvG~`.D _ PHONE NUMBER: - ~ ~3~ CELLNUMB~2: ~4 _~9_.,~~ S8 PROPERTY OW NER(Sj: ListPLL ox~ners onthe deed AGENT NAARE, ~ f~~/~ ~• /~ 7~°~- MAILINGADDRESS: _ OL W ~ .~ • i~~ ~ DD L_ J~ ~ 2O PHONENUMBB2: ~S 2 ~_ ~J{J rAXNUMBER: - _~~~ ~38 CELLNUMBER: ~ i ~~ ~. E MAILADDRESS ~[.E/(/~ ~,Q~-~~N(f~G~~~_ 1. ARCHiT-=CTURAL ~i fiEil9E: a The {andscaping in a Comxehersive Landscape Prosram shall be designed as s pmt of the ard~it~tura! gene ofi the principal builcfir~s praposedadevelopedonthep~c~~raposedforthede~eicor~rrt. Olt b. The design, chara~r, i~ation andla;' materialF of Lhe lm~dscape tre2frrsr~ g~cpc5ed In i:te C^rtt~!e?ssit^v La::~±=,^~s .~.r.~~an s1~: b® demo:~strablymore 0ttraofive than landscaping otherwise permr(ted on the parcel proposed fai' development tatdei' the nsrdmtmt tarsdscape standards. r1nV-uewe ~F(`~11/C1~ C.1UUac[rmen#s and S=ttingsideref; f~ssanll~esk#oplnewplenningfilestCvmarehensive fandsc~e Prearam 20Q&.d Page 1 of 2 ~C~ 12 2Q~6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2. , LIGHT1NlG: ~ ~ Any lighting proposed as apart of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is auhomatically contrdled so that the ligltirx3 is turned ofF when the business is closed. 3. COMMUNITif CHARACTi=ft: 4. PROPERTY.VALUES; The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape P. rogram will. have a beneficial impact on the value of the property In the' immediate vianity ofthe parcel oroooaedfordevelooment. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, ~AS THE CASE MAY BE;' IF'~THE APPCICATIOM FOR .DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES ACOMPREHENSIVE t-ANDSCAPE< PROGRAM, "WHICH' SATISFIES ''THE ABOVE GRITER1Ai. ..THE USE OF LANDSCAPE• .PLANS,' SECTIONS"/'ELEVATIONS,"" RENDERINGS AND P.ERSPECTIVESMAYBE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENTTHE.INFORMATiON PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET: ~ '~ SIGNATURE: I, the ur>dersigned, ackrrowledge that all representatior~ made.in this application are true and. accurate to the hest of my howled a and authorize City representatives to visit and plot rap the property descrit-ed inthis application. Sig naturd-of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF P1NEU_AS S orn o nd s bsaribed before me this 1 day of C~'b,~' _-_, A.D. 20 b to me and/or by ~~~~-_, who is ersonally Ia~own has produced - -N- -------~_. as identificati on. ~F ~~ - ~ .TANKOY~CARM NA Notarypublic, ~ MY ~ Mycommission e~ires~ '~ pq~ntESSMarc1i03,2010 of __ /Ef~S~~ntAssac.Co. OCT 12 2006 G:1Documents and SettingslderekfergusonlDesktoplnewplanningfileslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 2 of z PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The landscape treatment proposed intheCorr~rehensive Landscape Program will enhancethe commurdtycharacter of the Cityof~learwater. 5. SPECIAL AREAOR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the CityafClearwater has prepared and adoptadforihe areain which the parcel proposed fordevelopmentis located. ~~ :~a....~.e.w. .u~.uwn iw++a ao.xw A~~,cca •ttttwu.nu •IOYWiWt1~f1K • WIiOYTi OOW Iw'tw bMY ~witliw h wax tYlt .iMFYM thUMgIYtM p dC W ~. WY1fOM(f(AM1l1 OtdO~ KMpp W /IOfA NC ub~urrrorKad~oow uro'rw rcuw nwro~ts wrnan ~wxwnp cwsm v aua ~usas a wwotA we ~' ICI i ~~ ~~ ~~ -~ ~~F'"C `'i L-j ~ ~(' U l1~~YLLi C~ 31 J/ 'Siff CY 09/05/2006~J22:43 - ;•.'1 954Z2'r0332 HODGEN CONSTRUCTION ~ PAGE .04 ~TNST ~97-284411. OC1' 2, 1997; 3:41FM Tba.~ xns:.xument was Prepare- by and is to be Returnr_~ Co: ail .n S'. Deis ake~-man, ~tiite:$itt & Eidson, F.n. P.O. RoX 3273 Tampa, clorida 33601-3273 1813; 223-7333 QTY. FLA. 2 ~pxl~FV$~ ggSE~ FG ~'T5 OAF .RAC 1CD86100 YJ9 10-O'C-1997 1~aQ6:c'3 01 DED-FLA FAMILY INVF,9tORSlt(ENYON. RECORDING . 1 ~19.SD DOC STAMP - DR~l9 3 337,,804.00 soT~a~: s~,.ai~,~D 1 GNECR AYi.1E~a>~s s37t8ii;~a UpctMs9nt3ry TB% Pd. $ - In RQIbIGr1~QX f''~~ 5 Y.6trleen F. Qe Blaker erk, Plndilas .C~uA>y W,ARR~,NTY DEED ~~ 1T~ 'Dkiis ..WARRANT'Y ~ DI~;ED ..:I.s made azid delivered . effective a,s . of ~J $epternber 3 D , _.1°97 .by and betwe:e~ FLORT;~A FAMILY INVESTaRS r: II~TC. ;. a Florida coxporation,. whose busa.x~ess .address is ea~.•ua~e,~t~'lo ~ as Grantor., and RENYCN DODGE„ INC,., a F orida corporation, whose business address is 19400 LT.S. 19 North, Clearwater; Florida 34624.,. as Grantee. (All references to the parties herein. shall include their successors. and assigns. WITNESSETH: That Grantor, fox axxd in consideration of the sum of TEn and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), to it in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt of.,which is hereby acknowledged, has. granted, bargained, .andsold.: to Gx'a.ntee foretier, the real"~ 'property (hereinafter the "Property") . situated. ira. Pinellas County, Florida, • legally described below: PA1tCEL NO _ 5 ; The North 33o feet o~.the.Southeast 1/a of the .Northeast > Z /a of ..Section 19 , . 'Township 29 South;.: -Range : 3£ East,. .Pinellas Count.T, ~. Florida, hESS;AND;.EXCEPT.tHe.Easterly 10D.feet thereof for. right-of-wad. of U. 5_ ~Iig3~iwa,y~ .19.; .ALSO, 7,ESS AND. EXCEPT Florida Power corporation right-of-way..: over the westerly portion .thereof as recorded in .Official Records Bov.k 141.5, page 162;.. of~ the- public. records. of Pinellas` County,.. :Florida., alsr~ otherwise -described as: Tha Easterly 1104.1 feet of 'the Northerly 33 d feet of said Southeast 1/~ o~ said Northaa9t 1./4' LESS the said Eastexh% 100 feet ~tliereof for .right-of- way o£ U. S .~ Highway 19 ORIGINAL RECEIVED - CST 12 Z~O6 I'IANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARINATER 09/05/2006. 22:43 9547270332 HOD6EN CONSTRUCTION PAGE 05 OFF.kEC.BK ~~ PC ]7~3 TOGr,T'Hr,R WTT"ri a non-exclusive easement in favor of Thayer Motor . Comp~y, znc . , and Chaxlie ~iarris Pontiac, Iz~c. , for ing~;ess and egress by way of a 3O foot easar~ent between the above-described premises and Flare Boulevard recorded in `Official Records Book 2757, page 532, of tie public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parce]. Identigication Number: 19/29/16/00000/1a0f01o0 ~'0 IiAU-E aND TO. HOT,D the Property, with all improvements... thereon; unto Grantee in wee simple Forever. AND Grantor does hereby cosenant with G~:antec tY~at the Propert is free from.: a].l lieneched hero and by C this x'°-Terence set forth on Schedule ~~ atta incozporated herein. AND Grantor does .hereby fully warrant the .title to the Property, and will defend the samE against. the lawful c7.aims of all persons whomsoea'er. INc. , Signed., Sealed, and .Delivered FLOP.IDA. FAMILY. T~Tt7ESTORS, in th ezlce of : a Flor~,da ~xporation ,~ -~f L.tTCti~l~.~<.(1(I~iRC~.. ~SJ~,~'` ns i President ..~ .. iPrint or Type Names) . mA ~ ,,) ~~ {~FET~ CORPORP_TE SEAN} . • . i gnature ). ; ,, .. ~ . a'l` ~ , a,rs ~t ... {Punt ox ~y-pe;.Name) - ORIGINAL RECEIVED . ~ OCT l2 206 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/05/2006 22:43 9547270332 HODGEN CONSTP.UCTION ~ PAGE 06 FIKEI,T.,AS COUNTY FLA pFF.REC.BR 9gSc PG i?~4 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY . Oy PINELLAS ) ' The forego:i.ng ~.nstrument was acknowledged before me this - day of S.ep4ember, 19;97, by % - ~E,t~ ,~ , . as Presi3ent p~ ~`LORIDA FAMIhX INVESTOP.S. INC., a Florida Corporations for i~he corporation, ;i who is persona~l~% known to me or _ who has produced a driver's Ta,ca~se.as identi`f~ication (check an°)- (Si ature3 v ~i-~t~'1`jMtia ~ ' ~c'x~.r-~- ~._.. (Type or Print Name) Nctary Public . ~My .Commission E;Cpires: ~-/ ~ j~~ c~~~; . Commission ho- = ~~ ~~j ~Cr 09J05J2006 22:43 9547270332 ~ HODGEN CONSTRUCTION ~ PAGE B7 pZNELLAS CDUNTPGr~~55 • OFg_~C_ER 9858 SCHEDULE "A" 1. City of ,Clearwater easement recorded in Off~.cia1 P.ecnrds Book 1.675, gage 292. 2. Unrecorded Easements xecordzd in DEeds recorded in Official Pecords Boo}: 2285, .page 317. and~Official Records Eaok 2.826, page 53. 3. Cites of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 2389 page 685. 4. Flora.da. Power Corporation easement recorded . ~.x~ Official. Pecords Book•2o46.; Page 334. 09/05/2006 22:43 9547270332 }-IODGEN CONSTRUCTION • PAGE 08 _ .^ OCT 2 , 19 9 7 3 = ~ 1PM P INELLAS COUftTx FL~i . - ' Or?;'.P,EC. LF; 9858 PG J.756 _ ihia S:zs:rument was PzCpere by aad. is tc be Rct:usned to: . Aileen s. nacis 1CQB6101 I~,TB ID-0B-1997 15:D7:D3 Alterman,. senterfict ~ ~~S.ci".on, P.,a.. O1 II~D-KENYDKrRQGER/KEt(1'OH DOQGE ~N P.o. Box az~~ - REC~tDING 1 519.50 Tampa, Florida 33.fi01-3273- DOC STRMP - DR~19 3 18,400.00 (813: 223-'1333 e _ ^ ~f{~ -_ ;~ ``-`(dl.\Jf`..`~ ~ ~...1 TOTAL: t8, 414.50 ~t3rY~~Pd: S ,CHECK :AMT.IEHDERm: s8;4i9.50 D~ tnran9~bla?ax t"~. _ CHANGE:. !, 40 ?5,~~ 6 r, Clerk, PIr{etta~ County :. F_",,, Kgrleert F.(~ ~ ~p~~ CIerK ~ ~],, ~ WAR.K.~NTX DEED ~~}~- -~ ~~ This WARRANTX DEED ie made and delivex'ed ` effecti:re as of ~ • September 30, 1997 b~ and betweEn ROGER F. KENYON. arid. JANE .A. RENYON, his wife whose address is ~ ~~~ ,~,~1~[ES,~)~S•' ~A, ~~„~ .(J,~g.~.~,,~ as Grantors, and TCENYON DODGE, INC. , a Florida corporation, whose r C bus~.ness address is 19400 U.S- ~.9 North, Clear•~ater, Florida. 34624, '`r~~3 as Grantee _ (All referEnces to the pax'ties herein shall include theix successors and assigns.) v1zTNESSETH: That Gxantors, for and in consid°xativn of the sum of Ten and No/10o Dollars ($10.00), to it in hand -paid by. Grantee, the receipt of which, is tierebY . ac}:nowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to Grantee forevex, the real. property (hereinafter tha "Property"} situated in Pinellas County, Florida, legal~.y described below:- PARCEL N0. 4: The South 235 feet of. the follow~:ng: k'xom the Northeast corner of Section 1°, - . ~'ownsilip 29 South, Rax:.ge 16 East, run North 88'57'02".west, 100 :f=eet to the westerly right- of-way line ' of U . 5 . , T~.ighway .1 A ; .thence run South 00°52'25" 'West,. 6D9.:8o feet along said westerly right-of-;aay line of II. S. Highway 19 fox a Point of Begix~ing; `alienCE contixlue _ a?flng said rightt,-of-waV line South D0°52'25" West,. 73 0 feet to a f orty acxe .1 ine ; ,thence - run North 89.°1?'12".vest along said forty -acre lire, 330.00 feet; thence. xun North 00°52''25" ORIG(NAL~ . East-, 750.00 feet; thence. ruz~ South gq°1o' 24" RECEIVEQ East, 28.2 .feet; thence run South $9°13'12" ~~`,~ -~2.2t1~s w . ~ ?I.ANNING QEPARTMENT :. ~lTY AF CLEARWATER 09/05/2006 22:43 9547270332 . HODGEN CONSTRUCTION PAGE 09 PxNELLA5 C~TTY FLA. OFF_REC.BP 9858 PG 7757 East, 310.00 feat to the Point of Beg~.nz~.~,ng; also be;ng described a9 I.,ot 1, ICEN'zON DODGE, according to p1.at thereof xecorded in Plat Book 92, page 59r of the pub3.ic records of. p~.~,ellas County,. Florida.. Parcel Identfic~.tion Number: =19/29 /16/46388/Q00/Op010 PARCEL NO. 6: Tha .EasC S0 feeL of Lot 7, Block A, TROPIC HILI,B UNIT 0~, accor~in.g to plat thereof recorded in Plat :Book 57, page ~1, of the public. records ,of Pinellas: County, Florida. Parcel .Tdenta:fa.cat.ion Number: 19j2~/16/92322fD1f00071 TO HAVE AND TO HOT~D the propErty, with all improvements . thereon, unto Grantee in 'fee simple ioreJer. hND Grantors do hereby covenant w~.th Grantee that the Property is free from all liens and encumbrances except those items set forth vn Schedule A attached hereto and by th~.s reference incorporated k~erein. AND Grantors do hereby fn.lly warrant the title to the Property, and will defend the. same agaixist .the lawful claims of all . persons whomsoever. Sigized, Sealed, and Delivered -~_ ~.zl the . P n - 2 of : ~ . . C (8i gnature) ROGER F KEN7f ON (Print or Type Name) ~/~::.~ , ..r.•',~1-'3:E _-,~. -;1'? (SEAL) ~'~~,a~~ #~igr~ature} (Print or Type Name) (Both: witnesses witnessed. the signatures ORIGINAL of both Roger .F. T~enyon and pane A. Kenyon) RECEIVEI? ~~~T 12 2[~O6 - ~ 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARUVATER 09/05/2006 22: 43 9547270332 .. HODGEN CONSTP,UCTSON ~ PAGE 1H PIN EL.if~i5 COUNTY FLp oF~.~~~.s~ yssa Pti ~r$ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~'~ . day of September , 19 9 7 , by P.OGEP. F . KEN'z ON and. JANE A . KEIVYON, his wife,' ~ who are each personally Ynown to me or who have each. produced a driver's license as identificatioz~• tcheck one) • ~• /~ rte: . Notary Public- , . Print Name ~~=.-`r.'_r~C,•C.~ C • f' r-''~'-Ky Tdy Commission Expires : ~/~1.k~•~~ NC 1 ~,a4 ~,6~Bfl~Qe ~. ~~llR&ii ~: AloiaryPub~ic~ State of Florida ~Y ~ n ~ ~ ~a ~~ ~16~ 2G(~ i . c~ ~ CF ~~ 09!0512006 . 22:43 9547270332 . HODGEN CONSTRUCTTDN • PAGE 11 r~a ~TEI.~LAS CO~T . PG 1759 Dk'F.P.EC,BK 9855 ' SCHEDULE "An 1. F1or~da Powex Corporation easement recorded in official-Book :1041, pag° 669- ,(Parcel 4) 2.. City` cf C7:~arwater easement r~.corded in Official Records .Book 311.'7, page 338. (Parcel 4) 3. P.estrictions axed easement racarded in Official Records Book 3132 , page 312. (ParCe7. 4 ) 4. City of Clearwater e3sPment recorded -in Official Records.;Book.. 4526.. page 1472. (ParCe1 4) 5. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official P.eeords Eook Q526, page 1471 and Corrected iri Official. Records Book 4540; page 37. (Parcel 4) b. City of Clear-v~ater easement recorded in Official Records Sook 452G, pages 1473. (Parcel a) 7. City of Clearwater easement recorded. in Official Rec~xds Book 5067, page 752. (Parcel 6) 8.. CiLv of Clearwatex easement recorded in Official kecords Baok 5067, ..page 784. (Parcel 4) 9. ~ P.estrictions and easement recorded in Official ReCOZ'ds Baok 1D70, page 240; modified in. Official Records ~ook.4249, page a_52 and Official Records Book 8737, page 1970,, (Parcel .6) 10. Easements a5 shown at plat in Plat Book 57, page al...:{P:arcel~. . 6) ~ X1.1. recoxdings are to tie pubJ.ic re cords of Pinellas County, Floxx~a. ORIGINAL . RECEIVED ~~T 12 2006 ' ING DEPARTMENT PLANN CITY OF CLEARWATER a 09f @5/2086 22: 43 9547270332 HOD6EN CONSTf?UCTIOIJ PAGE 12 ante: 02/23/00 Time' 03:03 PM '.To: ET.-003-2000.32202-02239,4571 9 29547618475 , pnge: 007-DC3 Q~5&GE01 FL-00-9322-2 02/23/2000 0-.b0-02pm t T•4ge 1 of 3 .~.. rr ._ ~ • .'f r •~ ~~7 ~ 91~17Q+9S .' ' _ .'.r ~~ ri;}~ q. - .)tN~t'16. 1491 a{0'P!1 ~~.~. a pINELLA9 LOIItiTT fLAr^ ~ ~- ~.~cs~c ~so~ ro .asi3 - 7l~ ~ ~,: ~l ~ ", ~ . ~ ~ 'ffia ~' 1Q2. ~ t4ia ~ ' 1!!lr !~! f!!S L00>w O~- dated boas! ~. ~e~ r a bo an tindividrd xJ~ i~a~~ fotot~ s~ ~~ ;~ d~J~r as sruatr 1111dar '!~~! ~~~ /a11 r 1 ~r 't i {d!~ 1131 pe~C at~d aat~itr ee Pmo'l~eC- ~ ~ • ~ eth~riaa swnag.. ani ai~o.. o! s~rai p~p=tfir J!< ~~n mdl~iead z/s i~~sorsta ~ y°Qior'd aoss~r, ° s=o.r.•r . l ntindrs Isar yr..aeit aatre oceoos 11r 1'lASr KLZA C~el~ e~ i y ~,, 6 ~mcity to P:ot.°er OOI~r aa33r ir~thr aa~omdarr, ~• %~ _'~ _a>~ ai0pora ~ '~ r v to re tu~dlvfdod i/d ••~ ' ~atrssrti !~ idd~ lIWQSr loer~ly l~renrri d !mt !rte . r Q~f.~r ~ '~ u~' TrOei dakad OCtolrr llr .~~ ~;7 1ast+ Kith 1013 P~Q ated aslaooritY ~ ~~' a~raast0r dllr a~p7 ~M~ ~o~tr ee elb~eerin ~9+ a116 dispOra e! rM3 pt'lp~Yr :^. a to m aadlvi,~d~J6aai ~ ~ r DSO'. i~ OfdfO~ ~•..r< _ m~itiG,'1Rla< 1101®@ 39-. > ~ j ~T9S20) r 81119 ed~/~ ~i: pel.aiw~trr~rL 3sia i wad hasl~M1r t3ta brses +dr.~ntas" and e~llzaaM ~~ ~. eaa+a to iAClnd. ter •aaestlin~a, t+idiTMr siagalr pl0rrir ar ~ erae0net Slydieata.r .amd t!u e.3r~-Lgrl ~ =„pserntseiv.. ae4 api4lu as pe~DaaratiKer•) to ~id¢stia0. at' thr we at Orr no ~ 16~1~) is d h ~ .aYOabu cooddcatienr the saaipt _ a~lydpr~dr ' ~ ~~' t~ lo7.latltr0 aid to ~. . iea >ti a0d awigiu, [oss+-aTr duerllyd land. . 3ooatrd iu pinrSlu Oatmtyr x-lazidal BC ~ 'A' E1TA~ ~11fD ht 11 811d' H~DI. ~ . P1-RCSS, ~>rBmrsY~csd'ZOy Aar "' 19. aoJ~alooaoa/uoJosoor o x gQ ,~ oJo sa~ooo~o ao 9 ~ ~ / J s9/zs/ls/oeooo/u0Jo6oo am x ~ ~ ~ ~ im an0 sin9Olas for te"a" ~"=a0rnta © ~ K 4dgatert ritbt ref Ptl,rilrgar =1~Cr t3tlK. ietrsaat ~ indrr aeA raft tDOnm~ bs3omi9!>s9 !~ ~ _i =s~rsian, trra anpKin ,rpprx~iaiol.. in Lbe ri~la. ~~g , t!n OsoOEoft ha. qt hit liaad amd Mtl ~ a •a t~ deli tiz+rc .~. xxit~an. . ! vacs a r ,. s~•a• as s3orEar - ~.~e. . ,P.. ' ~ may- ts~~ , _ Rau . ~ I 1 a9 -. as i'taat!! *s ~ raaL ~ ~ ... : ~ / ' yy ar T~eawa use >a~ ~ T~s c~aa-9! tr.~':3t ~~_. ~oaaa ~. a®IKr s u~-° ' _ ~~~ ~* c~cxc ratt.~ ~f2r. J.~ ~r D C~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED u ~ 12 2606 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 09/05/2006 22:43 95472?0332 ~ HODGEN CONSTP.UCTION• ate: oZ/23/o0 aimm: 03:03 P!! re: F'I.-003-2000- 3?2D2-02231457 1 Q 19547618075 ~i 9mGE0i FL-00-9322-2 02(23/2000 D.~:00:02pan Pe.ge 2 of 3 a,,...... :. : '.~i ~, i~tsa~t liN ~pflbQd •Drr! ~.~~ . •. ~ .~ ,. , r. •' • • BAR'S 0~ .Z~ 8te•+ln~ ^!~ I~i ~'~a;f'._;~. ..v :. ,~~ F ~: ~. ipa~pt ru aelelprrlwl~jd °~'~ >ra ~ /~~a o/lr~~LDRIDR y+~x~~,p~ea~7l.ml :~.• ~•f.Drt r . .`,.,.r 1 ru ~ ~' ~ F ~'r i 7wti ~ . z ~ir'tn~'~ xee+.r.• on thls ~~• ••'~;}~' T~t1E n areal- C: c i ,y. ~ . lest OmMl98I~~t :•~~,~~~,~6'. ~~ w aura ~t+ ~6oa~o~h ~OLgR'i D1 nJa~AS 1~ ~~,pq ~mr~lt Mir w~rrOM~b~ ~le~ M 1~' !~ b~ laaMe~T_Lor~ Y '!fix E~ r ~. adt ~t~s." .~--. dnr ~s ~ ,=mss. ` ~~ • >Q ffiusa= PAGE 13 Pages: D06-009 rr p .. ..,.- • •;,• ORIGINAL ;-~ RECEIVED . _ ~, .. `., ~ ] 2 2006 : - . . ,. ~ . ~~ ~~ ~ :~ = =~ • PLANNING DEPARTMENT •. :.: - ~ ~; CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ != J~ _ @9/@5/2006 22:43 954727@332 HODGEN CONSTRUCTION PAGE 14 ate: oi/23/00 Time: 03:03 PM Te; PL^008-2000~2ZO2-azz9za37 3.B 195i761H475 ~ E~ga: oo9-onS ,, ' ~, MAGE01 FL-00-9322-2 02/ZS/2000 O~:OOz02pm Pago .3 of: 3 a~',`.4' M1 ~ ~ ~ - .. PTN~1r~-1C`~~/~~FL~R.wt- ~ t~~' - ~ ~ - ~11~.te^ 707 rY ifAV L :.'i:: .. .. ~ ~ . n.y:._ ~ r.,w '.., '- ~ '~! p!~ 0! 1~ ~ Yi. 0! 'efN ~Ied1~IC ~ df ~ 3!~ ~P is •'• R~ ~. weds li fry A~=IMe s ttet]aa .~~ -,.., .. d!~~1~~t~~ >tissi~eas ~t of tftislm if. 70rsdtp S ~. >M~ Ifi OUC. >o L ,; . r ~ ES7•/!s ~. ~ d~ ~ei6 ills a! s~ 4allm b. 'as~tp Z! .~. ~# u 1~1~ . ~' 11~ ~lst bs fb Est sigeiea..Q ifs. se tts, ear bl 111~e- ~. !°st'!Y ~., . pfq e!s nl.e z1111ar o= 9. ~. eu~..er L. otft tdllle er a fbfee s' • >•lplade;. Bald pemt bd4e) as t~ ~ d¢e!e'b~ 1~ a* ~ ><L1L mw ~ sihas ee !sr pLl. ad !lQ1C its nd! ~. r ~~ !a Ast !ls! !Z, isle u. •`• . . RRl!~~1l33ara ~ts~ t'~aaeirl tlssa~ emei~ fL /ls4'>~' 1L, >im ~ 1l~mt ~. ~ .; i ~'43'1i' IE., 33/ ~wk fa fMk be~Y~ aE >rM~ i1. '!~L' IIQ~i aLS ~ frees s • " /'R*iti` ~. ~ 33B Lip: ~ ~ ierfss ~ o! 'Oiq~e !l73a t~lw- tbaa ~ '. . ~ ff~ OE ~ 1~11s ~. w m m1i!!14 bb ~ C. fP1N CSI r/ ~ ~.~ 1fMt ~• it1Pi?'IT' _.~ 3~ !fit La 1b10t OQ ~~I l11~7Y ~C1h ~~ .. n ~ ~1 i35 f!~/! a! !~ ~elfa,ylllq. r~'• lar d0 ~1 !iS ~ ~t i~~ ~./ ~ t~ '~ t~ ~~ ~ ~ {f. ~. tee Lt ~ J 19 ies a lbdst of sgleateif ~m aed'~Ia aL14 ~''~- l~ ~ r° ~7Y ~.. Ili iut '~- • >~ aea f~l~eea f!^1 ~. .~ R.. dml ~1. .~' ~~~~rr /0R ltd E~ !~!1 t~7i1 ~ R A'7ii'b"' 6r 7~ >6•tf !!~ em L N°Ji'i/` L• ~.7i lnte tll~kw fsA L Li°J.1~3Z` b '~ Heat m ifsr eelaf: ee ~ . ~. ?lo~1a• ~sQ. UJOOier. doer. ~. e~ . i ~ ~ ~ t~ a!< ~ ielleldeg dleslpdaa Ls tlr 1eol9b yS f.rt ~dl >~' Rr !ee!lsft 0001! d yR'Im 14~ ~ 99 ~. ~ 7.i ~i f~ r' !alTfZs 11.. ]a l~le to ltla 11~e1T Ifo~ d 0. i. d~ Lt tiles » i. ~3i'2'~' ~. i~.t ~ ttLes9 ~ si¢pa~~fei? Ilea d 0.i. ~~r 19 !be s 10i1t ar sgimdgP tlls:~ eeesles- ataeq teals d~bee'^4 its 0. - !°'4'~" r.. T:i >9rk, m tt a a~ Zloe+i flMals >nea f. B°i3'zF 1f„ atesg MIIR. . . ~e~ aes 11ea 9s ttoaq tbeea sal L ~.,R'K' s., 7! >~ t~s s' r. i10f~~ZN L, 71.16 $rtS t~leelea es G tlpl7eli' L, ]U tta~ ~ es: IslAe at s~elnq. 1Tlatl]~ ter ?JAOldI• .. . . - :,- .,,.,, ~.~' . `r.-' ' . RECEIVED ..~` ~~. ~ . =~ ~ ~ ~..T 12 2t~06 i ~~ ~ - -`: ~ - PIANNING DEPARTMENT s.-?i~:' _ _i:°:~~- CITY OF CLEARWATER ~J7 ~ ~ _ .1 •^• 1 '' - _ CASE #: ~~ ~~p ' ~g ~~ o Planning Department ~_, C erwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff ip tials Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED: ~S - ~ .y Telephone: 727-562-4567 ORIGINAL Fax: 727-562-4865 RECENED /SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION AUu 2 4 206 Eld SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and pplication are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ~ ~ VE~v f~ _.1. /V C . MAILING ADDRESS: (, [~ L,[, ~ ~ L. ,3O ~/ PHONE NUMBER: ~ ~ - CELL NUMBEF~ - S PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: ~~~~ ,B. ~~ ~~ MAILING ADDRESS: 3 D( („ QOQ 0[„L a L 0 PHONE NUMBER: -- /L -- 3 FAX NUMBER: -- 23- 3 CELL NUMBER: - ~ ~ 5 ~ MAIL ADDRESS: ~ ~ /~ vE• B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) PROJECT NAME: UTd ~~OG~ ROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS Q U, PARCEL NUMBER(S): E~' ~~"~~~ PARCEL SIZE (acres): ~3i ~~ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C'~G 4.?'17J~~J~'A PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: ~~(~yEST APP~o/~ (~ Specfically identify the request ^c s~0~ pOQ~ ~~~ (include number of units or square `U /~ footage of non-residential use and all ~ ~ cs/ ~ 0 /~ requested code deviations; e.g. ~/Q ~Q.S~V/ I reduction in required number of r1 ^^ A ~.,~/ ~,~/~I parking spaces, specific use, etc.) /N TffE ~r7T.4~F/E~ ~/ i $ ~5~. X00 DESIGitJs~P~. Page 1 of 8 r LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 (No. 19-29-16-00000-110-0500) That part of the Northeast '/ of the Northeast '/ of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, described as follows: From the Northeast corner of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 18 East, run N88°57'02"W, along the North line of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"W, along the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, 609.8 feet for a Point of Beginning, said point being on the South right-of-way line of Tropic Hills Drive as shown on the plat of TROPIC HILLS UNIT ONE, as recorded in Plat Book 57, Page 41, Pinellas County Records; thence continue S00°52'25"W, 295.00 feet: thence N89°13'12"W, 330.00 feet to the East boundary of Block A, TROPIC HILLS UNIT ONE ;thence N00°52'25"E, 315.00 feet to the South boundary of Tropic Hills Drive by the following two courses: S44°10'24"E, 28.26 feet; thence S89°13'12"E, 310.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 2 (No. 19-29-16-00000-110-0600) The South 435 feet of the following description, less the South 365 feet thereof: From the Northeast corner of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run N88°57"02"W, along the North line of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to the West right-of-way of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"W, along the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, 609.8 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence continue along said right-of- way line S00°52'25"W, 730.00 feet to the forty acre line ;thence N89°13'12"W, along said forty acre line 330 feet; thence run N00°52'25"E, 750 feet; thence run S44°10'24"E, 28.26 feet thence S89°13'12"E, 310 feet to the Point Of Beginning, Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 3 (No. 19-29-16-00000-110-0610) The South 365 feet of the following description, less the South 235 feet thereof: From the Northeast corner of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run N88°57'02"W, along the North line of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"W, along the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, 609.8 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence continue along said right-of-way line S00°52'25"W, 730.00 feet to the forty acre line: thence N89°'13"12W, along said forty acre line 330 feet; thence run N00°52'25"E, 750 feet; thence run S44°10"24 E, 28.26 feet; thence S89°13'12"E, 310 feet to the Point Of Beginning, Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 4 (No. 19-29-16-46388-000-0010) The South 235 feet of the following: From the Northeast corner of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run N88°57'02"W, along the North line of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence S00°52'25"W, along the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, 609.8 feet for a Point Of Beginning; thence continue along said right-of-way line S00°52'25"W, 730.00 feet to the forty acre line; thence N89°13'12"W, along said forty acre line 330 feet; thence run N00°52'25"E, 750 feet; thence run S44°10'24"E, 28.26 feet; thence S89°13'12"E, 310 feet to the Point Of Beginning; also being described as Lot 1, KENYON DODGE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 92, Page 59 of the Public Records Of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 5 (No. 19-29-16-00000-140-0100) The North 330.00 feet of the Southeast '/ of the Northeast '/ of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the Easterly 100.00 feet thereof for right-of-way of U.S. Highway 19; ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT Florida Power Corporation right-of-way over the Westerly portion thereof as recorded in O.R. Book 1416, Page 182 of the Public Records of Pinellas County ,Florida, also otherwise described as: the Easterly 1104.1 feet of the Northerly 330.00 feet of the said Southeast '/ of the Northeast '/ ,LESS the Easterly 100 feet thereof for right-of-way of U.S. Highway 19; TOGETHER WITH anon-executive easement in favor of Thayer Motor Company, Inc. and Charlie Harris Pontiac, Inc., for ingress and egress by way of a 30.00 foot easement between the above-described premises and Ham Boulevard, Recorded in O.R. Book 2787, Page 632 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 6 (No. 19-29-16-92322-001-0071) The East 50 feet of Lot 7, Block A TROPIC HILLS UNIT 1, according to the plat thereof as Recorded in Plat Book 57, Page 41, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. pRiG~Np`~' RECENED ~~~ ~ 4 2~a6 PP~tM~~1t PV'`NNOF C` PRWp,SER C~~ ti r DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A ODPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. S~~ ~Tl~l ctlE~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. s~ ~T~/~~ 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. SSE ,E}77.4 ~A 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SSE 7T~~E1~ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SSE c~E.~ ORIGINAL AuG 2 ~ zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 2 of s CITY OF CLEARWATER r •. Answers to Submittal Requirements Code Section 3-913.A D1. This project consists of the exterior remodeling of an existing structure. Size and scale of all exterior buildings remain the same. An entry feature has been added to the existing showroom that is being remodeled in an effort to be similar in scale to the existing car dealerships to the north and south of the property. D2. All surrounding property has been fully developed. Improvements as a result of this project will only enhance their value. D3. The health and safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood will not be affected by the proposed project as we are improving existing buildings and site conditions. D4. The proposed project identifies one building to be removed and all proposed work being conducted within property. No traffic pattern accessing the site will be altered. Therefore issues with traffic congestion do not apply. D5. The proposed improvement to the site includes upgrading all landscape to comply with current code. Showroom building will receive architectural improvements to modernize the facade similar to properties to the north and south. Proposed paint color scheme will match existing. The proposed project will be consistent with community character of the immediate vicinity. D6. The proposed modification to the existing property will not have adverse effects or impacts as this is an existing business, currently operating at this location. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Aug 2 4 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r N WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ^ Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district sEE ~-~- ~~ 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district ~ ~E >~.~ 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. ~S'>~E 7'l-~l- ~-ff~1~ 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. S~~ f1-7T7~ ~1~ 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the focal economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. ~~,~r1~tAI . e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distan uildings. RECEIVED S'~~ ATT~ ~~ ~~~~. ~ n ~n~~ ENS 1 I.d •• ~' Page 3 of 8 CITY OF CLEA r M Answers to Submittal Requirements Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria This submission represents the remodeling of an existing car showroom building in excess of 25% value. As a result, we are submitting plans to bring a total of five parcels, under unity of title into compliance with current codes. To that end we are requesting two variances relating to landscape. The request for variance along with the south portion of the site adjacent to the existing is requested to allow the proper operation of service drive activity. Without this variance existing service function would not operate properly. The north landscape variance is requested so that the entire north parking area need not be reconstructed. 2. The proposed project has been designed to comply with all existing zoning and future land use issues, landscape, lighting, site drainage, etc. Thus providing for consistency with regard to goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed modification to existing site and showroom building will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. All work is contained within the site limits and no work is planned to existing engress/ ingress points. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed project. In fact, adjacent properties will be enhanced by improvements and construction of landscape buffers, added trees & shrubs. 5. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard and flexible development use. The project proposed involves the remodeling of an existing showroom building and site plan upgrades to comply with existing requirements. 6. The proposed modifications to existing showroom building provide changes in horizontal building plans, architectural details, variety of colors and finishes, building step backs, etc. All buffers have been met. Existing building location remains. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2006 PCITY OF C EEARWA ERT E.. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL'ftEQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4202.A.21) ^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the Ciry of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; 0 Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ^ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prpr to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATERPLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor _~elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; f~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, ./including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; O TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "cert~ed arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of uch trees; i~' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Q~ordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINA RY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C3RlGIIVgL RECEIVEp RU~i ~ 4 206 PANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CI-EARW,gTER Page 4 of 8 G. S TE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of~vay within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, inGuding fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or Vash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _~ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, inGuding all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED sEE 5~~~ - , o REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVB~ ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUti 2 4 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 5 of 8 y H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on~site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, incuding botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ~,~~ Irrigation notes. ~ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); t~/ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. UILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ~~ Sight visibility triangles; ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/~ X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, m~~t~~. drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) RECENED ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ ~~~ 2 4 2006 Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. CIN OF Page 6 of 8 SRI GI ~ RECFn~~„ K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4801.C) QUA 2 ~ z~r~s ~ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or 'rf the proposed development: PLANNING p CITY EPARTMENT • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ~F CLEARWATER ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehice directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ~ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table ofpre- and posFdevelopmentlevels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CA TION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150°/a of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ~ Acknowledgement offire flow calculations/waterstndy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. ~~~ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photogy~h the property described in this application. Signat~Fe of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sw rn to and ubscribed before me thiS~~ day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is oersonally known has produced as identification. Notary publ c, My commission expires: EI-~rl ~ ~- NOTARYtPl11~ ri;-51'Al'E OF FLORIDA Page 7 of 8 Commission # DD421950 Expires: APR. 24, 2009 >3ondcd Thy Adandc IIoncting Co., Inc. ~1 L_ J Clearwater CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY(Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562.4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ~//SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINALAPPLICATION-Plans and .application are req pared to be cdlated, stapled and fdded i nto sets * NOTE: ATOTAL OF 'IS SETS OF THIS APPLICATION ANi~ AI.L SiIPPORTiNG ~lOCtiMENTATION I$ REQti1RE0? TO BE SlDBMITTED IN COPiJUNCTION W ITH ACOMPLETE LEVEL ON E OR LEVEL TW O APPLICATION. C~I~P~~IEI~T~I~~ I,~DS~A~~ I'la~~P (Revised 03/29/2006) ~P')vEAS E ~'XFE OIZ PItINTi APPLICANT, PROPERTY O~lVNER AN®AGENT INFOR~M'A" TION: (Code Section 4-202.A~ APPLICANT NAIIIIE: /~ fZC a._. y~NII ~ ~ ,_o~-N C 'R. `~ _._.._..._.v./''.____q_ MAILINGADDRESS: _~~ .._ LL, wLIP_~~L_I1,0~_. _ _0_L.C. (Nt_J~_L_ ~__ (...- ~ _v LV a Q A __. _-- PHONENUMBER: qsg ~~ ~iV 3(1~ _.... CELL NUMBER: ~54 .8~?.8- C 5"8 _______.~._ PROPERTY OW NER(S): 7 List ALL owners onthe deed -_,_...._.~~r.._...__~___._~_...._._---~_.__...~. ___.-.______.._.._.___ - ~ -.~._ ___...__-. _ AGENT NAME; G ~~~Y~~. ~G~ C.C~'~..~._.,_._.,.____..._......_.___.____..__...~_wM._._......__..._.-_.u__.__~..._ MAIUNGADDRESS: ,~~~ ~~~ GvGib,~ll.,l/,~~...._ O~,.G (~VD.Q ._._~L 3.3O~R..v...._...w PHONE NUMBER: S~ _ M2 ~ ... ~$ 3 ~ __ FAX NUMBER: ~~¢~ ~~ _~~ 838 v~~ __._._.W, CELL NUMBER: 5 ~~~ ~' E-MAILADDRESS: [,E/VN 9. ARCHITECTURAL THEAfiE: a. The {andscapir-g in a Corr~xehensive Landscape Program shall be desigr>~ as a part of 4he archit~tural theme of the principal bttilcfirgs proposed ade~eloped onthe parcelproposedforthedevelopment. - -_ _ ... __GU~-7YN~_fr ~ !~_ _SlGri)~.I_.~C~eS._.4_~:I~ti1 ~.t~(G ~ ___~a+[- ~~ES~~1~. r[b rI1-hS__[TE~.,. A S.. i~`l~l.L ~Ss_P._.E.~~„)~~ ~e-_ V~~)_G.~__.___.~._. ___ ._ 1.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~e.T ._.a__.__.__ OR b. The design, character, lovation artdlor materials of the land;cape t~eattrerrt proposed Ir. the Compreh~lve Larz~cape Prgram sha! be demonstrably more attrao5~e than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum larxisc e ~~*~~ ORIGINA~ _ _ _ RECEIVED _ .. _._ ____._._._..._ W_._ _____ .___ a~~__~..~ ~~os _____.._ __..... _________._.s._.._..______...___. _ _. _ . ____ ..._. __ .____.~__._____... . __..~_..___._ PLANNtNGDEPAi3TMENT ____~._.__._ .~__ _..__. __.____ _.._ __~ _~___ .._ _ ._ _.. _ ... _ . __ . __. __..... _._..___..._..,._ - CITY OF £LEARWATER C.1Docurr~nfs and SetErngslderek.fergusonlD~skfopMewplar>ningFrles\Comprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 2. LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Con~xehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the IigtNtng is turned off when the business is dosed. w Cv.~NU NITY CHA.°~^.TE~: 4. PROPERTY VA!`UES: _fGa~S~ I`r1 C~1 _._. _... The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the propertyin the immediate Hanityofthe parcel proposedfor dedelopment S SPECIAL AREAOR SCENIC CORRIDOR Pt~MI: THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSNE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS /ELEVATIONS, RENDERiNuS AND PERSPECTIVES MAYBE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON TH15 WORKSM EET. SIG NATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the hest of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and phut raphthepropertydescribedintirosapplication. ~Signat of propertyowner or representative w ~__.._.._._.__ ...__ STATE OF F LORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL~S Sw n to ubscribed before me ttris ~K day of _/~ __ A.D. 20~(Z_ to me andlor by . _5.~1~_-_, who is Personally frown has proctored ------------------= asidentificalion. _ ;r;0'1'APY I'['":i.;GS'1'fil'F OF FLOEUDA ~~ Carolyn imenez Notarypubl ~°'_._._ .._.._..a.~___.. ~'~~" -Cliintnission DD421950 Mycomrr®ssion e~ires: f}~V I I Z4t2~ Expires: AP 24, 2009 - ___I3onded'I'}tru Atlantic f3o ding Co., Inc. C.1Documsnts and Settingslderelc.fergusailDesktoplnewpJanningfiles\Comprehensive Landscape Program 2006.d~IGINA~ Page 2 of 2 RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY 4F CLEARWATER The iarx~cape treatment propos ed i n the Comer ehensi re landscape Program uvill enhanc a the communltycharader of the Cityof Clearwater. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Larttiscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adoptedforthe areain wfiich the parcel proposed for detielopmentislocated. DESIGN SCAPES Of MANASOTA, INC. 7840 FRUiTViIIE Road SARASOTA, FL 34240 (941) 343-6161 FAX (941) 343-9450 August 28, 2006 Sarasota City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Autoway Dodge -Clearwater Comprehensive Landscape Program Application Dear Sir or Madam, • i LIC.#LC26000196 ~ ~ LIC.#16121181 . This letter is presented as an addendum to the Comprehensive Landscape Program Application for this project. Response to item #1 a is as follows: This project is designed per City of Clearwater code requirements in keeping with the nature of an Automobile Sales facility. The design intent is to beautify the grounds, create a positive appearance from the streets and neighboring properties and also limit the amount of organic litter on the vehicles. In addition, we have provided all landscape buffers as required per code. However, we hereby request a variance for landscape buffers in the following two locations: 1) Reduction of landscape buffer dimension from 10' to 5' on North side of property along Tropic Hills Drive. 2) Reduction of landscape buffer from 5' to 0' along a small portion of the South property line, measuriAg/270 LF. The reason for a ove request is due to insufficient space to accommodate the required width fortwo- y tr ffic flow. ORIGINAL Sin r y, RECEIVED J mes R. iczewski, RLA, ASLA AUIi 2 4 2c06 resider p CIN OF CLEp,RV-A ER y~pL o~. ~~6~bq 6~~ ~~~ d ~ .~~ A 9pp,=OJP ASSOCLITED LANDSCAPE COIVTAACTORS OF AMERICA ~~ Pye We Know Wha( Grows Ma'nte"aOOe Industry Professional wwe«so.... .. ~ ... .. ~J ,~ .- .Y., _ €. +~ iZ [C' 8 p M r~ • 3 O' Mp Z ~ GO W W ~ Q ~ 0 3 ~ N , '1~ ~QQ W (~ ` ~ 0 J U O ~ ~ O ~ Q ~J Z g~ FLEXIBLE DEV. APP. •urosweumrtee~u~ m1.,~mo •wuemvpew~x~wKe •wumwwnw.auac ~mnw ~<mmu roa oesiox sw~ uw.w~ >ao~i'Aµ xu.a iwsoow~++rmm~mar- vmneovnartnmcs o...e. /JD~OPYMIIIOTA MC WYMO~IEmVI®6t UNTILq p®I.W RYVCBE9 VdMdRTIlMARf611 ~ W1fOF OELON lCME6 WYYOfA ~~ ~~o ~~ ~~~~ ~- d ~~Z a Q J 8 -~ ~¢o ~1 AutoNation~ Sherry Williamson, Paralegal Real Property Law Group Telephone: (954) 769-6652 or (800) 899-4911 Ext. 6652 Facsimile: (9S4) 769-6622 Email: WilliamsonS@autonation.com VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS August 31, 2006 Mr. Neil Thompson Planning Department Municipal Services Building, 2"d Floor 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 AutoNation, Inc. 110 SE 6th Street, 20th Floor Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-5000 954-769-7000 www.AutoNation.com DPu~L RE: Kenyon Dodge, Inc. d/b/a Autoway Dodge of Clearwater Property: 19400 US Highway 19 North, Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Thompson:: V (} gip o ~ aoos U Regarding the above-captioned matter, enclosed please find one (1) original Affidavit to Authorize Agent, together with a copy of two (2) Warranty Deeds and one (1) Trustee Deed for the above property. If I may be of any additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Sherry ~ iamson Enclosure cc: Mike Archey, Esq. Chip Sabadash (w/enc.) Brad Hodgen c/o Debbie Brown (w/enc.) ORIGINAL RECEIVED `m G l 2006 PLANNING DEPARTl1~ENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: NVoN ()oaIGF t SNC. 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) L L u F ~ fs 4. That the undersigned (has/koare) appointed and (does/+~i) appoint: o ~~ s -' e. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Ksa onl ~cdGE, SMC., ro y ner Property Owner Property Owner M1lQ ~oNRT p/ ERRAA/c% HSSIS~"A~ur'S~'R~rARy STATE OF FLORIDA, // COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 6J ~ st day of ScwarraavR F~RRANo(o~ R,A~sryv`r E7' ~eSI oF" ~~~~~ , ~a-_ Personally appeared /CF~Ly_dL a(6f . Z^,vcr who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/>a~efully understands the contents of the affidavit that he%k~e signel ffA/a( NF ~S I°~'~PSoNA'Llcl/ /~Crvo wN 'Irb /li ~ , ,''~ `^~' CNMLEPIEJWILLbMIBON`I I,,, Notary Public ~ SIa4p}rp~ y, u+.,"~• My~ mm. Exprq Ap 11, ~ 3,,,,,;, mmi.uoll r OD2DO2io otary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: AP~~~Q ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~ of zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 8 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER ,~ ' _,',; ~; , - I)~ # 97-24411 -~ OCT 1997 3:41PM .l _ ~,; This Instrument was Prepare y and is to be Returned to: Aileen S. Davis Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, F.A. P.O. Box 3273 Tampa, Florida 33601-3273 (813) 223-7333 TY F liA . A~ CGV~ PG 1752 P1,sELL yg58 OFF.RgC gK 1C086100 Y3B 10-02-1997 15:06:23 O1 DED-FLR FAMILY INVE5TORS/KENYON RECORDING 1 519.50 DOC STAMP - DR219 3 ?37,800.00 TOTAL: 537,819.50 CHECK AMT.TENDERED: #31,819.50 `~R~E~t~, gocumentary Tax Pd. $ CHANGE: 5.00 T DES Y..ar{een F. Ge BiaY,er erk, Pinail~ ~;~ijn2y ;~ WARRANTY DEED ~w _ ~~ This WARRANTY DEED is made and delivered effective as of ~~` `September 30, 1997 by and between FLGRI;~A FAMILY INVESTORS, INC., a Florida corporation, wrio::~e business address is ~ e '3 as Grantor, and KENYON DODGE„ INC., a F orida corporation, whose business address is 19400 U.S. 19 North, Clearwater, Florida 34624, as Grantee. (All references to the parties herein shall include their successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), to it in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to Grantee forever, the real property (hereinafter the "Property") situated in Pinellas County, Florida, legally described below: PARCEL NO. 5: The North 330 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 29 South.,. Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the Easterly 100 feet thereof for right-of-way of U. S. Highway 19; ALSO, LESS AND EXCEPT Florida Power Corporation right-of-way over the Westerly portion thereof as recorded in Official Records Book 1416, page 132, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, also otherwise described as: The Easterly 1104.1 feet of the Northerly 330 feet of said Southeast 1/4 of said Northeast 1/4 LESS the said Easterly 100 feet thereof for right-of- way of U. S. Highway 19. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~? 01 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER AutoNationQ Shea°~y Williamson, Paralegal Real Property Law Group Telephone: (954) 769-6652 or (800) 899-4911 Ext. 6652 Facsimile: (954) 769-6622 Email: WilliamsonS@autonation.com AutoNation, Inc. 110 SE 6th Street, 20th Floor Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-5000 954-769-7000 www.AutoNation.com VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS & TELECOPY (727-562-4865) September 6, 2006 Mr. Neil Thompson Planning Department Municipal Services Building, 2"d Floor 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Kenyon Dodge, Inc. d/b/a Autoway Dodge of Clearwater Property: 19400 US Highway 19 North, Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Thompson: Regarding the above-captioned matter, enclosed please find one (1) original re-executed Affidavit to Authorize Agent, naming Glenn B. Giles of Arc Avenue, Inc. Architects as our Authorized Agent for the Site Plan Application and all permitting issues at the above property. If I may be of any additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, ~~ Sherry W' amson Enclosure cc: Mike Archey, Esq. Chip Sabadash (w/enc.) Jessica Wood (w/enc.) Brad Hodgen c/o Debbie Brown (w/enc. -via telecopy) u N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: ICs~n>f ion/ ~odCF, .TiyC . - R ~,CDR~dA LSD R P6R AT/D~ 2. e following described property (address or general location): th That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of ~~ ~~ ~9 T~Q ~S ~IC~NI~/Ry /9 NORT/f C~-~'ARt~/AT~i(' ~i(,oR/arR 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) pP,L~CAT/opt/ ANd A ~L,L ~FiP/y1/TT/Nl' TSS a ES SATE P~.F-w/ A . 4. That the undersigned (has/iMWIC) appointed and (does/d9) appoint: ~~,FNN ~ ~/ACES OF ARC AVENUE =n/C. A~Q~SH/Tf~~'TS as (bis/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Ilwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. KE~vyoai ~ d4E, Z-~/c. , P e y caner Property Owner Property Owner TaNfiTNq . FERRANdo ASS/STANT' SFcRETARs/ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PH~1~1.LhS BROl~/AR1~ Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this -r~T~ day of .TgNgTNl~N p ~FERRANdO~ ltSS/S qu SFG' ~ARy/ 07~ S~O7'~MB~ , 02 6 p~p personally appeared f(£/~/~ ~~~'~_ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/aMe~fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/spe.signed. dW0.B1EJMYNIUMi~N €.. rroury v~wie - sar. a traa. Mrca""~.'~a».2ooe ~ ~;a Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission xpires: AP/Q ~~ aoo8 Page 8 of 8 s • OFF.REC~ 9858 PG ].753 TOGETHER WITH a non-exclusive easement in favor of Thayer Motor Company, Inc., and Charlie Harris Pontiac, Inc., for ingress and egress by way of a 30 foot easement between the above-described premises and Harn Boulevard recorded in Official Records Book 2787, page 632, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 19/29/16/00000/140/0100 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, with all improvements thereon, unto Grantee in fee simple forever. AND Grantor does hereby covenant with Grantee that the Property is free from all liens and encumbrances except those items set forth on Schedule A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. AND Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the Property, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Signed, Sealed, and Delivered iri the ence of: \\ "V (Signature) (Print or Type Name) 7 'ignature) FLORIDA FAMILY INVESTORS, INC., a Florida,.~r~rporation / .~ ~ D~ 1C/i 1 ~ O 1 1 6 As i~ President (AFFIX CORPORATE SEAL) (Print or Type Name) ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 ~~? O1 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i ~ • PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.EK y85b P~ y7~~ STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September, 1997, by ~p(..~~ ~- 1~e,~yp,t/ as President of FLORIDA FAMILY INVESTORS, INC., a Florida Corporation, for the corporation, who is personally known to me or _ who has produced a driver's license as identification (checke). (Si ature) (Type or Print Name) Notary Public My Commission Expires : ~-~ ~~ c<-t~j Commission No.: l~, S ~~ %~~ 4~~-~ ~ pL~ I~FB~~ei~A C. FORA' 4~ ~n Notary Public, State of Florida ~ Comm. Expires Fsb. 6, 2000 ~,..~e Nc ,.,C5939F1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 3 =? O l 2Q0~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARW,~TER ~ ~ pI~LLAS COUNTY FLA` OFF.P.EC.BK 9858 PG 1755 SCHEDULE "Pb" 1. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 1675, page 292. 2. Unrecorded Easements recorded in Deeds recorded in Official Records Book 2285, page 312 and Official Records Book 2826, page 53, _ 3. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 2389, page 685. 4. Florida Power Corporation easement recorded in Official Records Book 2646, page 334. All recordings are to the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 ~~~ O1 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT' CITY OF CLEARWATER ri . '' f,. _~ INS 97-284412 OCT 1997 3:41PM This Instrument was Prepare by and is to be Returned to: Aileen S. Davis Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A. P.O. Box 3273 Tampa, Florida 33601-3273 'fit '(813) 223-7333 `~`{' SEC ' Tax Pd. ~ `~ ~~ ,A,.1. pocumen~ry InSangible Tax ~'d• EES_,.... 1_..•--""-~k, Pinellas County DePutY C1e~tc ~~TF_„_~ Karleen F• B .; c _`~ ey ~NELLAS COUNTY FLA. ~FF.P,EC.LK 985E PC i75b iC086101 Y7B 10-02-1997 15:47:03 01 DED-KENYON,ROGER/KENYON DODGE IN RECORDING 1 519.50 DOC STAMP - DR219 3 f8, 400.00 TOTAL: 18.419.50 CNEGK AMT. TENDERED: 18;419.50 CNANGE: 6.00 '~ WARRANTY DEED r.,~x. ~~ This WARRANTY DEED is made and. delivered effective as of September 30, 1997 by and between ROGER F. KENYON and JANEAr. KENYON, his wife whose address is n1 ~~~~ ~;~1~-C~S,~)~s~% ~R, ~,(,~cin I-i.~~e.t as Grantors, and KENYON DODGE, INC., a Florida corporation, whose ~'~ business address is 19400 U.S. 19 North, Clearwater, Florida 34624, 3yir~3 as Grantee. (All references to the parties herein shall include their successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), to it in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to Grantee forever, the real property (hereinafter the "Property") situated in Pinellas County, Florida, legally described below: PARCEL NO. 4: The South 235 feet of the following: From the Northeast corner of Se~~tion 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, run North 88°57'02" West, 100 feet to the Westerly right- of-way line of U. S. Highway 19; thence run South 00°52'25" West, 609.80 feet along said Westerly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 19 for a Point of Beginning; thence continue along said right-of-way line South 00°52'25" West, 730 feet to a forty acre line; thence run North 89°13'12" West along said forty acre line, 330.00 feet; thence run North 00°52'25" East, 750.00 feet; thence run South 44°10'24" East, 28.26 feet; thence run South 89°13'12" ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~? 012006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELL~ COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.B 858 PG 2757 East, 310.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; also being described as Lot 1, KENYON DODGE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 92, page 59, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 19/29;16/46388/000/00010 PARCEL NO. 6: The East 50 feet of Lot 7, Block A, TROPIC HILLS UNIT ONE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 57, page 41, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 19/29/16/92322/01/00071 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, with all improvements thereon, unto Grantee in fee simple forever. AND Grantors do hereby covenant with Grantee that the Property is free from all liens and encumbrances except those items set forth on Schedule A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. AND Grantors do hereby fully warrant the title to the Property, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Signed, Sealed, and Delivered in the Pr n e of: W (Signature) (P~r(int or Type Name) ignature) ~. ~1~a'f{"~ ~}~~af~lna(ol ,-~ i _._-~ `. ~ c~~.~~Y'~ ":'''/.~ .(SEAL) i ROGER ;F a KENYON ~~i'~ ~ ~~~`,~.~ ~;/~~ _.~-'~' ~ (SEAL) JANE A . KENYON ~=~ (Print or Type Name) (Both witnesses witnessed the signatures of both Roger F'. Kenyon and Jane A. Kenyon) 2 ORIGINAL RECENED ~~? 01 20QS PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER •PINELLAS C OFF.R~r B OUNTY FLA_ "`• K y858 PG 1758 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ ~' day of Se,~tember, 1997, by ROGER F. KENYON and JANE A. KENYON, his wife, _~ who are each personally known to me or _ who have each produced a driver's license as identification (check one). .y ~~ `%,; c~., ,~ Notary Public? Print Name ~,}=~~,c ` • ~ ~`fu~ P~Iy Commission Expires : =,:~/(f/,~.,~.: ~ C. ECG ~~~' ,~E;~S".~~ Florida I ~iotary Public, State a~ ,! `>~~.~~~~" i~r Comm. Enpires Fem. 6, 2C~ I ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~ 01 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER P1IvELLAS COTTTvTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 9858 PG 1759 SCHEDULE "A" 1. Florida Power Corporation easement recorded in Official Book 1041, page 669. (Parcel 4) 2. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 3117, page 338. (Parcel 4) 3. Restrictions and easement recorded in Official Records Book 3132, page 312. (Parcel 4) 4. City of Clearwater easement reco;:~ded in Official Records Book 4526, page 1472. (Parcel 4) 5, City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 4526, page 1471 and corrected in Official Records Book 4540, page 37. (Parcel 4) 6. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 4526, page 1473. (Parcel 4) 7. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 5067, page 782. (Parcel 6) 8. City of Clearwater easement recorded in Official Records Book 5067, page 784, (Parcel 4) 9. Restrictions and easement recorded in Official Records Book 1070, page 240; modified in Official Records Book 4249, page 462 and Official Records Book 8737, page 1970. (Parcel 6} 10. Easements as shown at plat in Plat Book 57, page 41. (Parcel 6) All recordings are to the public records of Pinellas County, Florida ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 ~;w? 01200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Date: 02/23/00 Time: 03:03 PM To: FL-003 0-00932202-02231957-1 @ 19547618975 IMAGE01 FL-00-9322-2 02/23/2000 0_.J0:02pm INBT • 91-170493 . . `'.. `~~':`,+ JtlN 2b, 1941 Bt03PM ` ~ ..~ - PINEtt.AB COUNTY FLA. ~~ REC 8K 7607 PD 4~is . Page: 007-009 ~a3e 1 of 3 (~ o ~~ o ~a~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~. 3 .;..-... ~- OFF. ' •.j ~: ~:~ 6 [~ ' ~ ' ~' ;:+ :. Tag Z1~TO83, trade this ~ 6 ~ day o! ~~ • 1991, !ry ~!!s. 7r00Ia1 YZLLdplLB, u TruatN t , , dated lebr:tary 1, 1984, as to an tttdivided i/7 interest; f~i I,1t3 ~.va, ae Tlrnstas under Truat llgrsssant dated October 11, 1988, ~ a ritL lull porsr and authority to protect, conserve, sell, leave, ~enausber, ar cthertrise asmaga and dl ~~~; ~ d ~ ~tdivi,dsd 1/6 interest; saol,~n ,'' . ~ ~ ~lltldei Trust llgreesent doled OCCebar il, 1988, rte. ~ ~ ~ . authority to protect, conserve, ee11, leaes, ~ :savage and dispose o! real preparty, as to an undivided i/6 .. ~ ~ interest; !'ffiI L~ lS1f~QiL, losaariy ttltontt as lO1t ltlt;! ~ , as Trusts under Trust Agseeseat dated October 11, .~ 1988, rich lull panez and authority to protect, oonsasva, pll, leave, ettc:aber, or otherrise anaga and dispose of real property, a ~ u to an undivided 1/6 interest Gruttor, tc z~ D~~. ~•, a .Florida cozparation, as Grantee (TEX IDBlAT21IGTI01t NWmER 89- ;I+ 0479570), rhosep li~s4ddraes ia: '" ~ j` Clsasrater, pL 94619 (Mhsnevar used herein, the taro 'Granter" and °Grantee" shall ba construed to include the asecnline, lainit-e, singular or plural. as the oottte:ct indicates, and the heire,isgal rsprase~ttativee and uaigna o! corporations.) In consideration o! the etm o! Otse Dollar (61.00) and Ot>ler valuable considazstion, the receipt of rhidt is horeby acXt-ouladQed, Grantor has granted, barq~insd and sell to Gratttae, its aucossaors and aesigtu, lot:~aws, the feilaring described land, located in pinallaa County, Florida: sss axnis=T "a• 11TTACHED x~utD twDS ~ raaT xartaor. 19h/~ 9/16/0 OOQ%130/0600Iand 19/ s/16v/00000/110/t1610 00/110/0500, `-~ Together rith and singular the teneaattts, ltezi~tas~tts and appurtenat:ces, with avsry privilege, right, title, inrterest and estate, reversion, reaaindsr affi eaaesient thereunto belonging m in anyrise appertaining. in !ee aiaple. I!1 NiT1TS88 itREitBOP, the Grantor has set his hand and seal on t1u date lust above mitten. ~ B8t-L) Veto Leyite C111emrscere, ae TruatN (BEJ-L) papa s Co v n, ao Trnata (8Et:1.) c Pau Luc 1 e oger . as TTSatee Ae 6..: R wsv,lll (8~) I resnsl , !/t s - Tsrri Lyttn eiiilanratezs, ee Tevstu 70 ~/~c~ 3_g_ o ..• ORIGINAL RECEIVED TAIS IttBTRiGO?liT MAS PREP ~ TCS Qb-2b-9Z 17:37:3 ' . GEOOYsE F. lt®Alt, ~71lRN Ttla 871ttRI8, Bl1R9tl1'P, MMM P. 0. DitJiM'EE 144 a 1 !l9.~D.~ ~: sT. pt3T+, !L 937~*~~ "s X12:409:60..::; FEES PAID 5 ~~ u`= TaT14L: l12i4~r: '`~` ~~ F , . pE9LAKERr E~ CHECK AMT. TE1~EI~D: ~i2'9Z6.~, . ~ CIW~6E. -.•. ~~ yERif IEO 9Y t - _ ~:,',. 35S•:A:, a~.. . W? 0120~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL"cARWATER Date: 02/23/00 Time: 03:03 PM To: FL-0030-00932202-02231457-1 @ 19547618975 . ~E01 FL-00-9322-2 02/23/2000 0~:00:02pm Page 2 of 3 .PINELL~ C~fl ~~ ' ;., 7507 p9 X14 :T ` .'- CD'~I'Pt O~ PDIaZSeild r ' ' _ '""`'' ':. ' . qq~ _ ' inq itutro~t ws aclrnarladgad 'baloar~_ ~y •.•~ ~ : ' _' ' "~''-~ ~`: - ~~ as ~'~. sraoeas. aae this •~ • -' ,1991. :'• ' -•. ~: : :. C y ^x aaeiise . ~ ~~ - _. ooo~c or Thy lorsgoinq inatiruaent vas aeRnwladgad eri !~ Q01.~1• u Tsuotae oa this L¢ dap s~! NY pplOflSSICtei 9~ZRES: ~~ No1ary Put'.i4 S'ie d !!aiida srATS OF ~ W Q 1D A Ib cam~oisioe faFiro a«.:1, Iv9t ,,. r,..... wa b..a.e ;.,, „n ~. ~ ~ I OOSiNTY 01~ ~~~I~~ L~ . ~ f ,.ty «..~.. , '~'~ ~'r)) '.a: ~i.: .,, y~, ~ N•.:.e: ~, ~:6~j M t~i ' fo.l ~ ". "~. . ~:. ~ .-: f-. ~ ~ ~ ~~` { .~ ~'~.. -. .... , •, Tha lorpoiaq instnmeat raa aaknarladepd bsloi~~ +PY .: ~9Lf!'1'~ LIIC2Lf.1 s00>3~, as Trnatu oa thls ~~• r ~,~ ""_. SVNE ,1991. ~ ;~~ ~i~~~•'=. t4~. ; ,~,~~ c lit CCOp[ISDBIjGQ( BxPI1tE8s ~~`•';{~b'•• i4 Y`L ~Fyp. ,. fie: ~ ". ~~~ of l~ oR i o ~ v •~ cotarrrt oir Pier ~~As ~ lore4olinq izutruasM ras acknari~oad bdosa r by !fit anor sW~ eo~.slt bra sr ems Lnm ~LL~. bra on-lAia ~__ day o! ~ `'•_•..~ ,i99i. ~ r!.(t~.. C- Il[ Op]pQ8SI011 SIRES: :~~ ~:~~~i ..:: ,'.e ~i .,, Page: 008-009 ~~ ORIGINAL '~~ RECEIVED N , •Yy ~~~~ -~ ` r ~~ 01200' lJ :.-l I" , "` ' ' ;.,~,-'~.`q . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~:: :. ~ ...: aY':i:. :.?L ~~F;. .. ':.;.,.;; CITY OF CLEARWATER •M "~ :, J ";`~A.' Date: 0°x/23/00 Time: 03:03 PM To: FL-003-2000-00932202-02231457-1 @ 19597618975 IMAGE01 FL-00-9322-2 02/23/2000 0~:00:02pm PINEL.LA9 COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.B7( 7807 PO 1"tis 5S5L'Sl. p. 1s EXRI82? •A" bat past at tee tbeeseaat ],/t. a! tine 1tutlseeat ~/4 a~ 5eotieo 19, !gyp b . ~. SfM~a l+i wt, delecleae as fallass .' 5f~ 1sr ^ostbeeat meos of aeelim 1!, 7ao~ip b SboRdr 9asapl L5 5aetr 5m L ~}'~ N., ataaq Noclb liaa os ~i0 i~ctim 3!r 'foio~hip 29 b~, lrogr Li sail, L5 bat 6e tea Nrat sift-o~l~q ilea of O.a. Hl~pr 1!t l~oa s. ~3t•ZS` 1[., gimp tee Nast sl~sl-oE~pt llaa o~ 0. 1. itt~ 1!. iA.O bat Loc a lbls~t d saolaoin5. Gala pout beissg m tee 5oate :t~l-ot..gr ise. oe 'ltapde mll. ma as sllfaaf m tea plat d SNbiC 5~ D~ 055;. ea nme6rd ~ fea~ StJlsca ~. ~ P1aai3aa Cannty eaoosdai lbama oontiata S. r/°5Z'~' N., 5le13r12` N., #3a brt ba 9~st soaoaasi of alcds s. b~IC lUEis a!? Old !!~ r. 5laR*35' &, 315 fast to ttsa 5entls saaaesr of 'mopic 1B13a Osivai teeoca ~ 5oo!!s >somany of 'hapie ili1L Dcioe by tee fol]adeg ~o macsaas S. Malt'31 E., 7/.2fi fMt~ teenae 8. f4a13'is` s., 31 fact sa Ibiat a! ee91oe11R9r PlnelLa ~I,y, l3atid.. 811Z~ as-. 2: 'fie lesstl, ~ faat d tee follwieq Aumriptim lra tee leuttt 955 face teeads f!atis tea met~eat meow e! bctlao 19. '~P b aesstls. aaaga li 5rat, tsn S. 5lo57r52' N., 1N Lat to the 5lslalq si~t~t-+a lioa d d. !. Sim 1!= te.o ssn L. 55o32'S" ^.. bl.5 feet aiaq alfa INaleclY del-d-~lf llee al 0. S. si~eaet 19 Daz a ibinl of tegianiepi boa aostlsua almo aafd sl~sD~oi~4 llea S. •7S' A. r 739 feel m a font ase llael llseeoe tm N. Afo13'32" w., elass5 aeia ~~yy eCn line 339 faati teaeioe sno N. N°62'=S' S: r 7J5 feat: teanoa tai iR ~4°1i'2~• E.. 25.76 faeti teaoo.:m 5. 59°13'12' •.. 31if feat tie tea fbiat of 5lgisniogr p1nallaa ~, tlessae. 5515>S. ID. 3s !d 5ont5 365 fae'~ of tea lsallaring aeees:fptim Lea tea Baalb 235 fast tbanot: !~ t~ 5seteeaat mQlat of 5as:tim 19r ~p b 80nlh^ naogis li 51at; tm Y. M°a7'A" N.. 1p faat t4 tea Nlsseerlt tie~b-oi~ey lloa of 0. 8. g!¢aay 19i three sesn ih 55°52'24' N., fi9.5li fast alaog aia 5felesiy sie~t-oE~y ilea e! 0. i. 19 fat a pbiat aE Bagimieq; teeeea amtlnsa aiaeg aaia si(pt~~ 1laa C '24' ~. 735 fast to a t/ atxa line! teeeae nm Y. 59°13']2' SL, aLsiS iaLO foey+ aeee live 3!5 faati te.soe sm M. 55°52'25• E.. 751 fact/ teeoa em S. Sio11'24• a., 25.]6 feetf tee tai 6. 59x13'12' E., 311 feet t» tee teiat of eagimio5. pioeSlaa t~Y, llosiae. .;„ ~~~: _ is"s :~:..,-~ :~.~ - i}.~~-ti '~i~:i7'~ .. :~- ~r~a. ~s _:~.: Page 3 of 3 ._ J .j ~:9 Page: 009-009 ORIGINAL RECENED ~~ ~~ 012006 ~, ~.~ PIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECENED Aug 2 4 2~os pLp-dNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~l0 5 FLD2006-08047 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N Date Received: 08/30/2006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 309B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet S~,AL~ 8/30/2006 ''I`' ~ Receipt #: 1200600000000008849 lo:1s:12AM ~ ~ = r Date: 08/30/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-08047 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,20s.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check ARC AVENiTE R_D 170s3 In Person 1,20s.00 Payment Total: $1,205.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~JG ~ 20Q6 PI-ANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application wilt be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.xpt Page 1 of 1 • s `~'r~S. (~ i~rh~ i ./ .. ~ ~ ~+~. ,. ~,~~~ T `~ Y'--~?'~TER~ ~~ ljJd,!/ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 21, 2006 Mr. Glenn B. Giles Arc Avenue, Inc 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood, 33020 ~ITY ®F CLEARWA'TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT OrPICr Box 4748, CLFARWA"CER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MIINICIPAI, S@RVICIS BUILDING, ZOO SOU"TH MYRTLB AVF,NUI:, CI,EAftWA"1'IiR, FLORIDA 33756 TTLIsPHONI3 (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order -Case FLD2006-08047 - 19400 U.S. Highway 19 North Dear Ms. Giles: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On November 21, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building height of an attached entrance feature from 25 feet to 36.5 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Section 3-1202. G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 13.17-acre subject property is located on the west side of the major arterial, US Highway 19 North approximately 150 feet north of Harn Boulevard; 2. That the property is located within the Commercial (C) District and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and Commercial General (CG) and Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan categories; 3. -That the proposed redevelopment exceeds 25 percent of the value of the buildings on the property and therefore parking and landscaping on-site must be improve to meet code; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-701 and 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; I'ICnn~~: ttnsicnrn. Mnvc~r Jcnin I~crn,,~n, Cc~unc:n.,~u;,ucser I Ic»-r I L~wi:r<m. Ccm~cii.>u:>lisr:a 13n.LJo~~sc~~~, C;cxmc:u..~ut:wisr.u Cnri.i:~ A. Yrrrrsc:n, Cuc rcc:n..~nt~u+er, "[?cninl. Iinai~L~wMr.N r nNn Ar•rnlnlnrlvl•: A<°ricl~ I;au~LCwl•:It„ ~ . November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 Page 2 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-704.C and 2- 704.S of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, all plan sheets are revised to show the canopies of all trees to remain; 2. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a revised landscape plan including a plant schedule/table be submitted; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a recorded declaration of Unity of Title for the six parcels of land is submitted to the Planning Department; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the sight visibility triangle restriction note regarding acceptable vertical height criteria for objects located in the sight visibility triangles shall be revised to state: To minimize traffic hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structure or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within the sight distance triangle; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance; 6. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 7. That the exterior building renovations need to be coordinated to create architectural uniformity (i.e.: painted and trimmed in similar colors) with the other buildings on the property; 8. That the proposed light fixtures are located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow; 9. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 10. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 11. That all existing and any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the .Community Development Board approval (by November 21, 2007); and 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (November 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original per7od of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one S: (Planning Department IC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications) US Hwy 19 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) ApprovedlFLD2 006-08 04 7Development Order.doc November 21, 2006 • FLD2006-08047 Page 3 additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on December 5, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for .parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. Sincerely, Mic elk, Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) )inactive or Finished Applications) US Hwy 19 N 19400 A:ttoway Dodge (C) ApprovedlFLD2006-08047 Development Order.doc • ~5 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, November 21, 2006, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC, Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Georgia Street Properties, LLC and 302-308 N Osceola Properties LLC (Thomas Coates, Triangle Development) are requesting Flexible Development approval for amixed-use development within the Downtown (D) District consisting of 358 attached dwellings and 13,235 sq ft of non-residential floor area with increases in ht to 48 ft (east side) and 180 ft (west side) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Sec 2-903.C of the Community Development Code [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (358 attached dwellings and 13,235 sq ftnon-residential floor area)] at 302, 303, 304, 308, 309, 312, 314, 400 and 404 North Osceola Avenue; 400 and 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue, 09-19-15-430, M & B 0400, 0500 & 0600; 09-29- 15, M & B 0010, 0080 & 0100; Jones sub of Nicholson's add to Clw Harbor Blk 2, S'ly 75.99ft of Lot 1 & S'LY 75.94ft of 2/3 of Lot 2; 09-29-15, M & B, 0010-0020 Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-05030 2. Kenyon Dodge Inc. (Glenn B. Giles, Arc Avenue, Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building ht of an attached entrance feature from 25 ft to 36.5 ft, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Sec 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 5 ft, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Sec 3-1202. (Proposed Use: Vehicle Sales) at 19400 US Highway 19 N. 9-29-16-110, M & B, 0500; 0600; 0610 and Kenyon Dodge Motor Vehicle Boat Showroom Unit 1. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-08047 3. Harborside Condominiums LLC and Bel Crest Condo, Inc (Janice Sands Ash, President, Ash Engineering, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit amulti-use dock for eight slips totaling 687 sq ft, under the provisions of Section 3-601. [Proposed Use: Multi-use docks of 687 sq ft for eight wet slips, in conjunction with a 15-unit attached dwelling use (condominiums)] at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo (Common Area). Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III FLD2006-06033 4. Dorothy B. LeBlanc and Sexton Enterprises, Inc. (Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 20,050 sq-ft office building in addition to existing retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 7.29 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 5.53 ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 22.91 ft (to existing building) and from 25 ft to 10.82 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5.33 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.48 ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to proposed building) and from 10 ft to 7 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.77 ft (to existing pavement), an increase to building height from 25 ft to 50 ft (to roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 193 spaces to 104 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Blvd from 15 ft to 7.29 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Duncan Ave from 10 ft to 5.53 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to 4.77 ft (to existing pavement), and a reduction to the required foundation landscape area along the north side of the West Marine building from 5 ft to 3 ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Restaurant at 921 Lakeview Rd ,Lake Belleview Add Blk 1 lots 13-15 and part of lot 16, lot 17 - 21. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III FLD2006-05032 5. Society of St. Vincent de Paul of Upper Pinellas County, Inc (Sidney Klein, City of Clearwater Police Chief) are requesting an amendment to a condition of approval requiring neighborhood meetings from not less than quarterly to not less than bi-annually on a previous Conditional Use application permitting a residential shelter and police substation (condition of approval adopted November 5, 1996, and re-adopted July 15, 2003, by the Community Development Board). (Existing Use: Residential shelter, police substation and parking lot) at 1339, 1341, 1345 Park Street/1344 Pierce Street, Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. CU96-46 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. • Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://Clearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 11 /10/06 • a ' • Schodtler, John From: Lawrence R. Mayer (Imayer@mba1973.hbs.edu) Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:41 AM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Thanks! RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 John, Thanks so much for your reply! 2 appreciate the time and effort you took for your detailed reply. I think you have answered all the questions I could think of for now. Hopefully, when I am in Clearwater, I would like to meet you and other staff just to "get a lay of the land" and try to understand the differences between areas -- more for curiosity than for any particular development. I end up dealing with far too many developments here -- both as President of the Arlington County Civic Federation (which unfortunately limits the amount of time I can currently spend in Clearwater - see http://www.civfed.org/) and local developments. This is continues to be intense, even with a real estate slowdown, since development (now more commercial than residential large condos) appears unabated and we are in the midst of revising the Sector Plan (20 year development plan - see http://www.co.arlington.va.us/Departments/CPHD/forums/clarendon/CPHDForumsCl arendonMain.aspx ) for the Metro station area less than 1/2 mile from my Arlington home. Also in process are many site-plans which the Civic Federation is involved including a significant Rosslyn build out (another close - 1.3 mile away station area on the Potomac) and site plan meetings are ceaseless - even one tonight on a major development with both 11 story and 34 office buildings (see http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/CPHD/Documents/8288sprc_112006.pdf ). I understand how all planners -- no matter where they are located are overworked (and underpaid -- well maybe not in Arlington). FYI - Your counterparts Web site in Arlington is located here: http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/CPHD/CPHDMain.aspx -- and you can get an idea of the differences in the process -- especially since Virginia is a Dillon Rule State. By the way, the document I linked to is active for me (an Adobe PDF link - your browser has to link to the Adobe Reader) -- and I am sure that it is not limited locally since when I am in Florida I can review all this -- as well as see Web casts of the County Board meetings (since pretty much everything goes through them). Even though the Clearwater Site Planning documents are not available on-line, I appreciate that other material (particularly the case status - something Arlington neighborhood associations and the CivFed has been pushing toward for years, particularly Zoning Administrator decisions/status) is available electronically. Keep on trying to get material on-line -- it helps us "snowbirds". Feel free to pass on whatever I have written. Again, thanks for your time and efforts in making my "winter" home's surrounding area a better place to be. Have a good meeting tomorrow -- and as said maybe we can meet when I get to Clearwater. Regards ......... Larry -----Original Message----- From: John.Schodtler~myClearwater.com [mailto:John.SchodtlerCmyClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 8:46 AM To: lmayerCmba1973.hbs.edu Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 1 • Larry, Thank you for taking part in our Development Review Process. Your comments are appreciated. In brief, Autoway Dodge has asked to make improvements to their main building (the one that looks like a fifties automobile dashboard). Their proposal exceeded a redevelopment trigger. That trigger is redevelopment on the site that exceeds twenty five percent of the value of only the buildings. They therefore are required to update their parking, landscaping, and signage to be in compliance with current Code requirements. This they have happily complied with. Your concerns about allowable construction times are regulated by the Land Development Code and enforced by the Building Department. This is why they are not attached as a condition to the Site Plan approvals. Section 3-1508.B.10. states, 10. Construction or repairing of buildings. The erection including excavation, demolition, alteration or repair of any building so as to create a loud and raucous noise other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on any day or at any time on Sunday, except in case of urgent necessity in the interest of public health and safety and then only with a permit from the building official, which permit may be granted for a period not to exceed three working days or less while the emergency continues and which permit may be renewed for successive periods of three days or less while the emergency continues. If the building official should determine that the public health and safety necessitates the issuance of such a permit and will not be impaired by the erection, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or the excavation of streets and highways within the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. or on Sunday, the building official may grant permission for such work to be done within such hours or within a shorter time period during such hours, upon application being made at the time the permit for the work is issued or during the progress of the work. With regards to the impact on Traffic there are no additional "curb-cuts" proposed. Your concerns about the loudspeaker system are duly noted and will be discussed with the applicant. They are also a Land Development regulation enforced by the Building Department. Section 3-1508.B.5. states, Radios, amplifiers, phonographs, etc. The using, operating or permitting to be played, used or operated any radio, amplifier, musical instrument, phonograph or other device for the producing or reproducing of sound such that speech or music emitted by the device is identifiable in terms of words or melody so as to create a loud and raucous noise. With regards to landscape maintenance plans, no wanting to sound like a broken record, but the also is a Land Development regulation that is enforced by our Landscaping division. They perform reinspections at least one every two years, or as needed. The example you provided below has been removed or relocated. While I could not access the document, the thought is much appreciated. http://www.co.arlington.va.us/Departments/CountyBoard/meetings/2006/June/061 0/31ab.pdf Thanks in advance to whatever additional information you can provide. If the only material is only available in your offices, the so be it -- I will obviously not be down in Clearwater prior to or for the November 21st hearing Unfortunately, we do not have the resources to provide the contents of the file electronically. But it is something we are striving for in the near 2 future. John Schodtler, Planner II Planning Department, City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone 727-562-4547 Fax 727-562-4865 John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Lawrence R. Mayer [mailto:lmayer@mba1973.hbs.edu] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:41 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; larrymayer@civfed.org Cc: Schodtler, John Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Sherry, Please call me Larry -- that is my preference! I appreciate your prompt replies! I wish the Arlington, VA Community Panning and Development Department planners were as responsive to site plan particulars as your department. In particular, the ability to review Case Status provisions on-line is appreciated -- something they are working on here, but haven't yet accomplished. I apologize in advance if I do not parallel some of the Clearwater terminology. In my role as a neighborhood leader and President of the Arlington County Civic Federation, I have been involved in way too many developments -- and, while not a professional, am familiar with aspects of planning, zoning, by-right, and site plan developments in Arlington, which I am sure are different than in your area. I have been unable to locate the particulars of John's report -- in particular any site plan conditions. What I suspect the residents of the southern end of the Mobile Home Park would be most interested in is both any conditions to be applied during the construction period (hour limitations of construction - in Arlington sites near neighborhoods are restricted to 7AM to 9 PM on weekdays and 10 AM through 6 PM on weekends and holidays), debris management, worker parking, etc.). They might also be interested if there are additional "curb-cuts" for entry or exit given the massive congestion on the highway. I suspect, but do not know for sure, that there could be an interest in on-going conditions related to use of any public address system sound levels encroaching on the Japanese Garden property (a problem with at least one of the car dealers fronting US19 across from the mobile homes). Additionally they would probably desire a landscape maintenance plan that ensured a continued good looking property among other provisions. Probably also desirable are points of contacts that could be reached during all construction hours, should there be problems. An example of probably a more complex set of conditions for a property for a site plan development that I have been more recently involved with can be found here: http://www.co.arlington.va.us/Departments/CountyBoard/meetings/2006/June/061 0/31ab.pdf And the conditions begin on page 32 of that document -- and there are some 84 conditions -- I know this is more complex than what we are talking about here, but it is a more recent one including what we have learned from "too" much development in this area. Thanks in advance to whatever additional information you can provide. If the only material is only available in your offices, the so be it -- I will obviously not be down in Clearwater prior to or for the November 21st hearing 3 • Larry Mayer -----Original Message----- From: Sherry.Watkins@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sherry.Watkinsc~myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 3:20 PM To: larrymayerCcivfed.org Cc: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Importance: High Good Afternoon, Your property is located within a Mobile Home Park that is within 200 feet of a Flexible Development case. The City of Clearwater as a courtesy notifies all property owners within the Mobile Homes Park when this occurs. Thank you should you have any questions please contact me at (727)562-4582. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins~myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 -----Original Message----- From: planningweb Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:51 PM To: 'larrymayer@civfed.org' Subject: RE: CDP. Case FLD2006-08047 Mr. Mayer: Mr. Schodtler is in receipt of your email and voicemail and is verifying with the City Clerks office the reasoning for noticing your property at 2633 Nagano Drive which appears to exceed the 200 foot notice requirement of the Code. He will contact you when he receives the response. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Internet_Comment_Card [mailto:Internet Comment Card] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:38 AM To: planningweb Subject: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Sender's Name: Larry Mayer Date sent: 11/14/2006 9:38:16 AM Comments: Planner is John Schodtler -- received CDB hearing notice as within 200 feet ( Owned Property is 2633 Nagano Dr - Japanese Gardens. NOTE: GIS Map shows > 1000 feet. 4 • Is Case material - e.g. site~an & conditions (more than Parcel Info & Case Status) avail Electronically -- to Email address below. (Also left for Mr. Schodtler Tel Message) -- Pls respond with specifics Sender Email: larrymayer@civfed.org Mailing Address: 3108 4th Street North Arlington, VA 22201-1614 Phone: 703-525-8921 5 / '~ • Schodtler, John . From: Schodtler, John Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 8:46 AM To: 'Imayer@mba1973.hbs.edu' Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Larry, Thank you for taking part in our Development Review Process. Your comments are appreciated. In brief, Autoway Dodge has asked to make improvements to their main building (the one that looks like a fifties automobile dashboard). Their proposal exceeded a redevelopment trigger. That trigger is redevelopment on the site that exceeds twenty five percent of the value of only the buildings. They therefore are required to update their parking, landscaping, and signage to be in compliance with current Code requirements. This they have happily complied with. Your concerns about allowable construction times are regulated by the Land Development Code and enforced by the Building Department. This is why they are not attached as a condition to the Site Plan approvals. Section 3-1508.B.10. states, 10. Construction or repairing of buildings. The erection including excavation, demolition, alteration or repair of any building so as to create a loud and raucous noise other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on any day or at any time on Sunday, except in case of urgent necessity in the interest of public health and safety and then only with a permit from the building official, which permit may be granted for a period not to exceed three working days or less while the emergency continues and which permit may be renewed for successive periods of three days or less while the emergency continues. If the building official should determine that the public health and safety necessitates the issuance of such a permit and will not be impaired by the erection, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or the excavation of streets and highways within the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. or on Sunday, the building official may grant permission for such work to be done within such hours or within a shorter time period during such hours, upon application being made at the time the permit for the work is issued or during the progress of the work. With regards to the impact on Traffic there are no additional "curb-cuts" proposed. Your concerns about the loudspeaker system are duly noted and will be discussed with the applicant. They are also a Land Development regulation enforced by the Building Department. Section 3-1508.B.5. states, Radios, amplifiers, phonographs, etc. The using, operating or permitting to be played, used or operated any radio, amplifier, musical instrument, phonograph or other device for the producing or reproducing of sound such that speech or music emitted by the device is identifiable in terms of words or melody so as to create a loud and raucous noise. With regards to landscape maintenance plans, no wanting to sound like a broken record, but the also is a Land Development regulation that is enforced by our Landscaping division. They perform reinspections at least one every two years, or as needed. The example you provided below has been removed or relocated. While I could not access the document, the thought is much appreciated. http://www.co.arlington.va.us/Departments/CountyBoard/meetings/2006/June/0610/31ab.pdf Thanks in advance to whatever additional information you can provide. If the only material is only available in your offices, the so be it -- I will obviously not be down in Clearwater prior to or for the November 21st hearing Unfortunately, we do not have the resources to provide the contents of the file 1 r • electronically. But it is so~iething we are striving for in the near future. John Schodtler, Planner II Planning Department, City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone 727-562-4547 Fax 727-562-4865 John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Lawrence R. Mayer [mailto:lmayerCmba1973.hbs.edu] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:41 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; larrymayer@civfed.org Cc: Schodtler, John Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Sherry, Please call me Larry -- that is my preference! I appreciate your prompt replies! I wish the Arlington, VA Community Panning and Development Department planners were as responsive to site plan particulars as your department. In particular, the ability to review Case Status provisions on-line is appreciated -- something they are working on here, but haven't yet accomplished. I apologize in advance if I do not parallel some of the Clearwater terminology. In my role as a neighborhood leader and President of the Arlington County Civic Federation, I have been involved in way too many developments -- and, while not a professional, am familiar with aspects of planning, zoning, by-right, and site plan developments in Arlington, which I am sure are different than in your area. I have been unable to locate the particulars of John's report -- in particular any site plan conditions. What I suspect the residents of the southern end of the Mobile Home Park would be most interested in is both any conditions to be applied during the construction period (hour limitations of construction - in Arlington sites near neighborhoods are restricted to 7AM to 9 PM on weekdays and 10 AM through 6 PM on weekends and holidays), debris management, worker parking, etc.). They might also be interested if there are additional "curb-cuts" for entry or exit given the massive congestion on the highway. I suspect, but do not know for sure, that there could be an interest in on-going conditions related to use of any public address system sound levels encroaching on the Japanese Garden property (a problem with at least. one of the car dealers fronting US19 across from the mobile homes). Additionally they would probably desire a landscape maintenance plan that ensured a continued good looking property among other provisions. Probably also desirable are points of contacts that could be reached during all construction hours, should there be problems. An example of probably a more complex set of conditions for a property for a site plan development that I have been more recently involved with can be found here: http://www.co.arlington.va.us/Departments/CountyBoard/meetings/2006/June/061 0/31ab.pdf And the conditions begin on page 32 of that document -- and there are some 84 conditions -- I know this is more complex than what we are talking about here, but it is a more recent one including what we have learned from "too" much development in this area. Thanks in advance to whatever additional information you can provide. If the only material is only available in your offices, the so be it -- I will obviously not be down in Clearwater prior to or for the November 21st hearing j Larry Mayer -----Original Message----- From: Sherry.Watkins@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sherry.Watkins@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 3:20 PM To: larrymayer@civfed.org Cc: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Importance: High Good Afternoon, Your property is located within a Mobile Home Park that is within 200 feet of a Flexible Development case. The City of Clearwater as a courtesy notifies all property owners within the Mobile Homes Park when this occurs. Thank you should you have any questions please contact me at (727)562-4582. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 -----Original Message----- From: planningweb Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:51 PM To: 'larrymayer@civfed.org' Subject: RE: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Mr. Mayer: Mr. Schodtler is in receipt of your email and voicemail and is verifying with the City Clerks office the reasoning for noticing your property at 2633 Nagano Drive which appears to exceed the 200 foot notice requirement of the Code. He will contact you when he receives the response. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Internet_Comment_Card [mailto:Internet Comment Card] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:38 AM To: planningweb Subject: CDP Case FLD2006-08047 Sender's Name: Larry Mayer Date sent: 11/14/2006 9:38:16 AM Comments: Planner is John Schodtler -- received CDB hearing notice as within 200 feet ( Owned Property is 2633 Nagano Dr - Japanese Gardens. NOTE: GIS Map shows > 1000 feet. 3 x Is Case material - e.g. site~lan & conditions (more than Parcel Info & Case Status) avail Electronically -- to Email address below. (Also left for Mr. Schodtler Tel Message) -- Pls respond with specifics Sender Email: larrymayer@civfed.org Mailing Address: 3108 4th Street North Arlington, VA 22201-1614 Phone: 703-525-8921 4 CDB Meeting Date: November 21, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-08047 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owner: Kenyon Dodge, Inc Applicant: Arc Avenue. Inc Address: 19400 US Highway 19 North CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: 'REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building height of an attached entrance feature from 25 feet to 36.5 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Section 3-1202. G. CITRRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. CURRENT FUTURE LAND Commercial General (CG) and Residential Urban (RU) Land Use USE CATEGORY: Designation. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vehicle Sales Proposed Use: Vehicle Sales EXISTING North: Commercial (C) & Low Medium Density Vehicle Sales & Single SURROUNDING ZONING Residential (LMDR) Districts Family Residential AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District Vehicle Sales East: Office (O) & Mobile Home Park (1V1TII') Offices & Mobile Districts Homes West: Institutional (I) & Low Medium Density Progress Energy Power Residential (LMDR) Districts Lines & Single Family Residential ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 13.17-acre site is located on the west side of US Highway 19 North approximately 150 feet north of Harn Boulevard. The site consists of six parcels of land that make up a corner lot. The five parcels fronting on US Highway 19 North are zoned Commercial and one small parcel located in the center of the property is zoned Low Medium Density Residential. The entire site is utilized for vehicle sales. Seven individual buildings are utilized to perform the various tasks related to operating a vehicle sales Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page ] • establishment, such as administration, service, sales office, and parts warehouse. The majority of the property consists of paved parking and display areas that are minimally designated or striped. The expansive parking and display areas lack landscaping or have a minimal amount at best. The surrounding area along US Highway 19 North consists mostly of uses typically found along major arterials roads, such as vehicle sales, retail sales and services, business and professional offices, and restaurants. The surrounding area to the rear of the property consist of single family and multi family residential, as well as a Progress Energy overhead utility line. Development Proposal: The redevelopment consists of two components. The first component is the updating and re-imaging of the existing sales/show room building, which includes the demolition of a portion of the sales/show room building. The existing building was designed to have the appearance of a futuristic dashboard. The architecture of the proposed facade is a good integration of surrounding architecture through the demolition of a small portion of the building and the utilization an entrance archway. The proposed increase in building height for the entrance archway to 36.5 feet from the allowable 25 feet is in keeping with the adjacent two story vehicle sales establishments. The second component consists of site improvements including the parking, landscaping, and signage. The proposed parking improvements include increasing the front setback to pavement along US Highway 19 North from zero feet to 15 feet. This improvement will allow the introduction of landscaping and trees along the front perimeter of the property, greatly improving the appearance of the property along US Highway 19 North. Additionally, the proposed parking is organized, with designated customer, employee, service, display, administrative office, and storage (inventory) parking areas in the vicinity of where those functions will take place. The inventory and display areas utilize bull pen parking, or double and triple stacking, to minimize asphalt parking area and to allow additional landscaped areas. The landscaping improvements include updating interior islands to meet minimum landscape requirements. The updating of previously paved perimeter landscape areas will not only assist with storm water attenuation and runoff, but also provide shade to the existing vast areas of asphalt. The development proposal is estimated at $750,000, which exceeds 25 percent of the valuation of the buildings according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser and therefore triggers parking and landscaping to comply with current Code requirements. The development proposal will retain 63,405 square feet of the combined size of the Autoway Dodge buildings, while a small portion of the main building (approximately 2,000 square feet) will be demolished. The existing improvements are apart of re-imaging campaign that includes upgrading the existing facade of the main Autoway Dodge sales/show room. The proposal also includes a request for two deviations from the landscape code. The first deviation is a reduction to the front (north) landscape buffer along Tropic Hills Drive from ten feet to five feet to allow existing drive aisles to remain as a part of the onsite vehicle circulation system. The second deviation is a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer separating two vehicle sales establishments from five feet to zero feet for a distance of approximately 240 feet to allow existing parking and drive aisles to remain that cannot otherwise be revised to meet the parking and landscape codes concurrently. The proposal compensates for this area by doubling the landscape buffer further west in the vehicle storage/inventory area of the property. The signage on the site exceeds minimum code and will be updated conditionally as apart of this redevelopment effort. Flexibility Criteria: Pursuant to the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.5.2. of the Community Development Code for a Vehicle Sales use: The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 2 • parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. The existing development is inconsistent with this criterion, it has historically operated as a vehicle sales establishment adjacent to residentially zoned properties. Pursuant to the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.S.3. of the Community Development Code for a Vehicle Sales use: The display of vehicles for sale shall be located within an enclosed building. The existing development is inconsistent with this criterion, as historically this use has primarily displayed vehicles for sale outdoors, with a small percentage being inside the main sales building. Pursuant to the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.5.4. of the Community Development Code for a Vehicle Sales use: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. The existing development is inconsistent with this criterion as it fronts on and involves direct access to a major arterial street, US Highway 19 North. These inconsistencies related to the flexibility criteria for vehicle sales uses located in the Commercial district, exist and the proposal as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with improved landscaping, parking, and signage components demonstrates an improvement over the existing development and is compatible with the surrounding area. The proposal will enhance other redevelopment effort in the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.~ Pursuant to Section 2-701 of the Community Development Code, the Floor Area Ratio for properties located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use designation is 0.55. The development proposal complies with an FAR of 0.11. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.2 Pursuant to Section 2-701 of the Community Development Code, the Impervious Surface Ratio for properties located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use designation is 0.95. The development proposal complies with an ISR of 0.79. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-704.C. of the Community Development Code, vehicle sales uses are required to provide a front setback of 15-25 feet and a side setback of 10-20 feet. The subject property consists of two front setbacks (north and east) and three side setbacks (south, north, and west). The development proposal has provided a setback of at least 25 feet to the building from all property lines. However, a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) has been requested to accommodate an existing parking area and drive aisle. A reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) is requested to accommodate a required 15-foot perimeter landscape buffer. The existing pavement (display area) exists at a zero setback for the majority of the eastern property line and the proposed reduction will be in compliance with the setback and landscape requirements. A reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) is required. The reduction to the setback is to accommodate an existing parking area and drive aisle that are severely limited due to the existing placement of the main sales/service building. The south setback exists at a zero setback for the entire length of the property and a portion about one quarter of the length of the property line will remain at an existing zero setback. A reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) is required. The reduction to the setback is to accommodate an existing inventory/storage area and drive aisle. The west setback exists at a zero setback for the entire length of the property and a portion about one third of the length of the property line will remain at an existing zero setback. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-704.C. of the Community Development Code, the maximum building height for a vehicle sales use is 25 feet. The six existing, single story buildings on the subject parcel are in compliance with this requirement. However, the proposal does include a request to Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 3 allow a building entrance archway feature with a height of 36.5 feet, which can be supported. The adjacent vehicle sales establishments both feature two-story sales/show rooms that are consistent with this proposal. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Section 2-704.C. of the Community Development Code, parking is required to be provided at a rate of 2.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of vehicle display area. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with the parking code, 632 parking spaces provided where 125 are required. Design Standards for Parkin? Lots and Parking Garages: Pursuant to Section 3-1402.B of the Community Development Code, there shall be no more than one entrance and one exit or one combined entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. The Traffic Engineer agrees has determined that the applicant's request will alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow patterns through the improvements to the site. Currently all entrances are being used for the intended use and are to remain. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, a 10 foot wide landscape buffer is required along the front (north) property line. The applicant has requested a reduction to this landscape buffer at five feet in order to accommodate an existing parking area and drive aisle. The proposal has supplemented additional landscaping at the corner of Tropic Hills Drive and US Highway 19 North to balance this reduction, which can be supported. A 10 foot wide landscape buffer is require along the side (south) property line. The south landscape buffer currently does not exist for the entire length of the subject property. The applicant has requested a reduction to this landscape buffer in order to accommodate an existing parking area and drive aisle that are severely limited in width due to the placement of the existing main sales/service building and this portion about one quarter of the length of the property line will remain un-landscaped. A 10-foot wide landscape buffer is required along the side (west) property line. The west landscape buffer does not exist for the entire length of the property. The applicant has requested a reduction to this landscape buffer in order to accommodate an existing ingress/egress easement with the property to the south and an inventory/storage area. The portion in the ingress/egress easement is about one third of the length of the west property line and will remain un-landscaped. The remaining proposed landscape buffers are in compliance pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or deve]oped on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the, minimum landscape standards_~ Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 4 o • Consistent Inconsistent 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A .automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive ~ X landsca e~r~am will enhance the community character of the Ci of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the arcel proposed for development. ___....._ .... p.... ..... . 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the arcel ro osed for develo ment is located. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping along the perimeters of the proposed non-residential off-street parking lot retains numerous existing mature trees and proposes to plant additional trees in excess of the minimum requirements. Further, ample groundcovers/shrubs are proposed along these perimeters consistent with the requirements of Code. It is noted that pursuant to Section 4-1102.A.8 of the Community Development Code, the landscape plan shall include the location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape materials. The most recent submittal of the proposed landscape plan does not include this information. It has been attached as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan including this information (also a plant schedule/table) must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Solid Waste: The development proposal will utilize the existing solid waste facilities on site. These solid waste facilities have been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si~nage: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. It is noted that pursuant to Section 6-104 of the Community Development Code, in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure nonconforming signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. The most recent submittal does not include this information. Without a sign inventory of existing signs located on the subject property it cannot be determined whether this Code is met. It has been attached as a condition of approval that all existing and future signage must meet the requirements of Code. Lighting The development proposal includes updating the parking lot lighting. The proposed light fixtures are "cut-off' type luminaries and will be located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 5 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-701 and 2-704 of the Community Development Code: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 0.55 0.11_ X _.Y ~ _I.S.R.._ ............................................... ..._0._95_......~...................... 0.79 X ~ ~~ Lot Area 40,000 s uare feet 573,893 s uare feet X Lot Width _. _.. 200 feet 730 feet X Setbacks (to ~~ Front: 25 feet North: 5 feet X' pavement) _ _ _~ Front: 25 feet East: 1~5 feet .-X' Side: 10 feet West: 5 feet X~ Side 10 feet South: 5 feet X' Side 10 feet North: 12 feet X Height 25 feet 36.5 feet X Off-Street Parking Vehicle Sales - 2.5 spaces per 1,000 SF 632 parking spaces GFA (125 spaces) X ~ See above discussion regarding Minimum Setbacks and Landscaping. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.S. of the Community Development Code (Vehicle Sales): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The ross floor area of enclosed buildings is at least 4,000 square feet. _ ......................g.............................................._...................................._.........._.......................................... ..... ... X 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land X' which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. The display of vehicles for sale_shall be located within an enclosed building. X' 4. The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not X involve direct access to a ma'or arterial street. _ ..................................................._....._......................J.........._..............._......._............._. _.........................._...__.........._.................................................................................._.... ..........................................................._.... ..............................._...._..._.._..._..._....... 5. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in X a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicini of the parcel proposed for development ........................................................................................................: 6. Front setback: The reduction in front setback results in an improved site X .-plan orr t~roved design an~pearance. 7. Rear setback: The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the X rear of any buildin b emergency vehicles. _ ...............$........y................................ ~........................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................._... ~ ......................_......_.._....._..._........_........ 8. Rear setback: The reduction in rear setback results in an improved site plan, X more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum re wired. ~ See above discussion regarding Flexibility Criteria. Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 6 • The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent l . The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or develo ment standards set forth in this zoning district. __ ........................._.........................................._................_......P.............._............................................................_....._...................._._......._..._..._....... __....~............................._..._.............. ._......_.................................._........_........ .._~._....._.__......................___................... 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X develo ment and im rovement of surrounding properties. P ...........................................p.............................................................._.......................... _.........._....~........................_.............._._............................... ..........................._...................._................. ..........................................................._....... 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a workin waterfront use. _.........._.........._ _....P ........................................_......................._........................................................................................... 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and amactive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desi and a ro riate distances between buildin s. Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 7 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X covera e, densi and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. _._.......~_ .... g......... n' _.. 2.~ The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residin or working in the neighborhood. g ..................................... _......._............... ......................_...._......_....._....._.._........... .............................................._........_......... 4. The proposed deve~ment is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X~ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X _ .immediate vicinity. _ 6. ~ The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on adjacent ro erties. See above discussion regarding Design Standards for Parking Lots and Parking Garages SiTMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of October 5, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 13.17-acre subject property is located on the west side of the major arterial, US Highway 19 North approximately 150 feet north of Harn Boulevard; 2. That the property is located within the Commercial (C) District and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and Commercial General (CG) and Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan categories; 3. That the proposed redevelopment exceeds 25 percent of the value of the buildings on the property and therefore parking and landscaping on-site must be improve to meet code; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-701 and 2-704 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-704.C and 2-704.S of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building height of an attached entrance feature from 25feet to 36.5 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 8 U setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Section 3-1202.G. with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, all plan sheets are revised to show the canopies of all trees to remain; 2. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a revised landscape plan including a plant schedule/table be submitted; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a recorded declaration of Unity of Title for the six parcels of land is submitted to the Planning Department; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the sight visibility triangle restriction note regarding acceptable vertical height criteria for objects located in the sight visibility triangles shall be revised to state: To minimize traffic hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structure or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within the sight distance triangle; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance; 6. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 7. That the exterior building renovations need to be coordinated to create architectural uniformity (i.e.: painted and trimmed in similar colors) with the other buildings on the property; 8. That the proposed light fixtures are located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow; 9. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 10. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 11. That all existing and any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 21, 2007); and 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. rrepared yy ?lannin~ lepartment Staf£ G John Schodtler, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: ^ Location Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Future Land Use Map S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDB( US Hwy /9 N 19400 Autoway DodgelStaffReport.doc Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 9 John Schodtler 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4547 i ohn.schodtler(a~myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida January 2006 to present Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Made presentations to various City Boards. Created custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Planner I City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida March 2005 to January 2006 Duties consisted of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Made presentations to various City Boards. Created custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Development Review Specialist/Associate Planner City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 1998 to March 2005 Assisted customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for Flexible Standard cases (variances & conditional uses). Created custom Crystal reports for the planning department. Computer Systems Administrator. Maintained the department computers, software and networking systems and trouble shooting difficulties at the departmental level and acting as liaison to the Information Technologies Department for larger scale problems. • Customer Service Representative City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 1996 to August 1998 Duties consisted of assisting, directing and informing customers with occupational licenses and building permits. Additional duties involve greeting customers, reviewing building plans, accounting and general data entry. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Business Management, Minor in Human Development, with Honors, Eckerd College, 2006 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Planning Association Housing Rehabilitation Inspector (SBCCI) Community Development Board -November 21, 2006 FLD2006-08047 -Page 10 ~ /~ • `Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: GLEn~ ~ f~j. G ~ ~S FAX: ~5~'" ~~3' 3$3 ~ Phone: FROM• Jo~dni sG+~pT~..E~ Phone: DATE: ~ I I ~ '1 ~ DL SUBJECT: ~u'~drm-Y ~oov6 ~'~ R~-f~R~' MESSAG NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ~ O Nov. 17 206 11:47AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 81 919549233838 No~.17 11:42AM 04'51 SND 10 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MBJU' #84. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, CALL 1~-HELP-FAX C43S-7329). • • Page 1 of 2 ~, _ z Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:32 AM To: 'nicholas fritsch' Subject: RE: Kenyon Dodge You are welcome, Nick. Have a great weekend and see you next CDB. -----Original Message----- From: nicholas fritsch [mailto:nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:31 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Re: Kenyon Dodge Thanks, I didn't dig into the L-3 and L-4 sheets. They are right on. ON the signs, usually the specifics are included in the conditions. As long as they are nailed down with the existing text, I'm OK. Nick ----- Original Message ----- From: John.SchodtlerCilmyClearwater.com To: nfritsch _.tampabay.rr.com Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 3:49 PM Subject: RE: Kenyon Dodge Good Afternoon Mr. Fritsch, This would seem to be the time to provide landscaping along the south property line: escpecially in the front (back to the notch in the bldg.) and west of the building along all of the parking. Should the south property redevelop, Kenyon's property would be an eyesore on the north. There is room to do it. [Schodtler, John] I believe the applicant has proposed landscaping along the southern and western property lines in a similar fashion as to what you have spelled out above. If you have received the packet, take a look at page A-1.0 of the site plans. If I am not following you let me know. The staff rec. 11. seems ambivalent. Are you refering to the new sign on the upgraded bldg? What about the 3 pestistal signs - do they stay or go? I don't see the monument requirement stated.[Schodtler, John] Condition of approval #11 requires that all existing and any new or proposed signage meet current Sign Code. This meaning that they are allowed one attached sign and two freestanding signs by rights of being a corner lot. If they wish to keep any existing attached or freestanding signage in addition to what is allowed by right, than they have to apply for a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) application. The same goes for if they wish to have additional attached or freestanding signage . Through the CSP application process, we will obtain the monument signs. The applicant is well aware of the signage issues as they were discussed at the October 5, 2006, DRC meeting. As always, feel free to contact me anytime. 11 / 17/2006 Page 2 of 2 John Schodtler, Planner II Planning Department, City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone 727-562-4547 Fax 727-562-4865 John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com 11/17/2006 FT,n200<j~R047129 I T~s AL & AL 19,820 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5016 HIVICSKVJC, HIVI~CLV V AMBROSE,SUSAN R 1830 ASPEN CT HEATH OH 43056 - 1722 ATKINSON, JANICE E 2635 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 BALLARD, STEVEN MABRY DAASE, LARRY A 1246 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 BRAUN, CHARLES A BRAUN, ANNA R 1283 TEAHOUSE DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1004 BURBACK, PAMELA S 2627 FUJIAMA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1020 CLARK, JOHN W THE CLARK, MARIE E THE 2631 JAPONICA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1022 COPSEY, DENNIS PORATH, JOHN G 1225 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5025 DAVIS, MILDRED G 1259 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 DICKEY, RYAN D 1254 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 BAKER, DORTHA A BAKER, JERRY R 2645 OSAKA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1028 BORDIER, PHILIP BORDIER, LORRAINE 2635 FUJIAMI DR CLEARWATER FL 33764.- 1020 BRONSON, ABILENE W WARDAN, KAY PO BOX 125 SWEET VALLEY PA 18656 - 0125 CABRAL,JAMES CABRAL, MARIA 1285 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 CLIFFORD, KEVIN JR CLIFFORD, SAMANTHA .2549 TROPIC HILLS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6004 DALTON, PHYLLIS 2640 SUMO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1039 DE GRAAF, CAROLE 2629 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 DWYER, MARGARET M DWYER, STEPHEN A 2644 NAGANO DR # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1011 .ANDERSON, FRANCIS L ANDERSON, BONNIE S 2541 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017 BAKER, JOHN THE BAKER, THELMA THE 7730 E ANTHONY BRANCH MI 49402 - 9611 BOBBIE, JUDITH M 2636 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1029 BRYANT, JACK L BRYANT,LELAI 2626 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - CHIONI, ELAYNE 2641 SUMO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1040 COLVIN, PAMELA L THE TRUSTS 12/31/68,10/11/88 8950 SEMINOLE BLVD STE 3 SEMINOLE FL 33772 - 3891 DANCHYSITYN, MICHAEL DANCHYSITYN, HUGETTE 2637 SUMO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1040 DELCUETO, JULIE A 1267 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 EIKELBERGER, LLOYD A EIKELBERGER, MARGARET 2640 FUJIAMA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 ENGLISH, JOHN L FLUM, ANTHONY J ENGLISH, MARGARET R EVANGELIST, PHYLLIS FLUM, PATRICIA A 2513 POMMEL DR 1266 CARACAS AVE 2626 FUJIAMA DR ST LAZARE OC 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 CANADA • • GANG, SUSAN L FOGARTY, MICHAEL E FOLEY, LILA L GANG, JOSEPH R 2323 SULPHUR AVE 2632 PAGODA DR 2652 OSAKA DR ST LOUIS MO 63139 - 2829 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1029 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1003 GATES, HELEN M GILPIN, CAROL Y GLENN B. GILES, ARC AVENUE, INC. 1283 S KIMONA DR 1213 CARACAS AVE 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1024 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5025 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020 GLUSZEK, JAN GOFF, JO ANN C GRAYDON, BRYAN A GLUSZEK, BEATA 2548 TROPIC HILLS DR 2643 PAGODA DR 1276 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5036 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 GRENIER, GLENN L GRIMM, GAIL HALA, BRONISLAV 1275 BURMA AVE 1285 CARACAS AVE 1255 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 HALL, BEVERLY K HANNEL, ROBERT E SR HEENAN, EDWARD B HALL, MARVIN N HANNEL, BETTY HEENAN, ROCHELLE A 1120 BRETON SE 1289 BURMA AVE 2632 NAGANO DR GRAND RAPIDS MI 49506 - 3530 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1025 HOFSTEADTER, FRANK P THE HOPPER, WILLIAM R HULKA, HELEN E HOFSTEADTER, PATRICIA THE HOPPER, ETTA A 2651 PAGODA DR 1224 N CHERRY BLOSSOM DR 2622 BUTTERFLY DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1049 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1015 HYNES, KATHLEEN A JAPANESE GDN MOBILE EST INC JEDREZEJOWSKA, EWA 2634 FUJIAMA DR 19709 US HIGHWAY 19 N 2547 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017 JONES, STEVEN L JOWRIE, DAVID S KAISER, R MARLENE JONES, REGINA W JOWRIE, LOIES H 2630 FUJIAMA DR 1290 CARACAS AVE 1230 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 KELLEY, RICHARD F KENYON DODGE INC KOSER, JARED KELLEY, JOAN M 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N 3535 TUNDRA SWAN ST 2650 NAGANO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6016 LAS VEGAS NV 89122 - 3500 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1011 KUSS, DONALD J LA ROU, GERALD LEE, EDWARD M THE KUSS, KATHLEEN M LA ROU, DOROTHY LEE, SARAH J THE 2632 FUJIAMA DE 1282 BURMA AVE 2638 SUMO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1039 • • LESNER, SUSAN LEWIS, ELAINE LINCARE HOLDINGS INC GRUSS, VALERIE 1211 N KIMONO DR 19387 US HIGHWAY 19 N 2627 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1052 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3102 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 MALLIE, DONNA L MACRI, GARY M 509 E MT VERNON ST MALLIE, DONNA 2636 W GRAND RESERVE CIR 1217 TEAHOUSE DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4903 PO BOX 302 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1044 METAMORA IL 61548 - 0302 MAMMOSER, THOMAS E MARNIE, ANGELINE MARONTO, JOHN A 2656 OSAKA DR 1275 S KIMONA DR MARONTO, ADDIE J CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1003 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1024 3003 S ATLANTIC AVE #6C5 DAYTONA BEACH SHORES FL 32118 - 6168 MASON, EDWARD V MAYER, JODY B MC KAY, ANDREW L MASON, MISA B 3108 N 4TH ST 18304 GULF BLVD # A305 1272 CARACAS AVE ARLINGTON VA 22201 - 1614 REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 - CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 1018 MEANS, KARL MEDLEY, RICHARD A MEYER, HELEN M 1275 TEAHOUSE DR HOLDERFIELD, JENNIFER R LOHKAMP, NORMA L CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1004 1252 BURMA AVE 2645 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 MILLER, CAROL ~ MILLER, LOU A MINOTTI, SHARON A COOLEY, JIM 1206 N KIMONO DR 2625 BUTTERFLY DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1050 1284 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1016 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 MOLDENHAUER, ALICE U MULLEN, EILEEN MYERS, WILLIAM J 2612 BUTTERFLY DR 1269 BURMA AVE ANTICOLA, RITA M CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1015 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 909 VERCELLI ST DELTONA FL 32725 - 3535 NICOL, ELIZABETH A NIMBLETT, LEO O'DONNELL, THOMAS E 59 CHARLOTTE DR NIMBLETT, DORIS J O'DONNELL, SHIRLEY M WINTER HAVEN FL 33880 - 4909 2652 RICE PADDY DR 2624 BUTTERFLY DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1033 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1015 PAGE, J B PETERS, SARAH C PETSCHER, MENASHEN PAGE, LAURA I 1255 BURMA AVE PETSCHER, PHILIP 2644 OSAKA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 2341 INDIGO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1027 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1430 PHILLIPS, ALAN POSTON, ERVIL M POULOS, CATHERINE A PHILLIPS, TERESA 1278 CARACAS AVE 1279 CARACAS AVE 1261 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 •REID, GEORGE D REESE, LESLIE RIPLEY, CARLTON L 1242 CARACAS AVE REID, BARBARA A 1200 TEAHOUSE DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 2548 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1043 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5035 ROBITAILLE, HILDEGARD H RUSSO, FRANK SAKEMILLER, CHARLES W 1288 BURMA AVE 2626 SUMO DR 1276 S KIMONA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1039 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1023 SANDVIK, ROBERT J SATMARY, JEFFREY SCHOOP, ROBERT V SANDVIK, MARY M 12311 TWIN BRANCH ACRES RD SCHOOP, DELL P O BOX 175 TAMPA FL 33626 - 4420 2634 JAPONICA DR LA CRESCENT MN 55947 - 0175 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1021 SCHROTH, HAROLD C SR SCIBETTA, VINCENT R SECCIA, ALTA M VIVACE-SCHROTH, CAROLE A SCIBETTA, RUTH I MORIARITY, TOM 2636 JAPONICA DR 36 CORNELL AVE 1263 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1021 BUFFALO NY 14226 - 4208 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 SMITH, DARYL E SOLLAZZO, JOSEPH L JR STEWART, SHEILA 1264 BURMA AVE SOLLAZZO, KRISTEN STEWART, CHARLES CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 2535 BRENTWOOD DR 2629 NAGANO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1026 TAWSE, LINDA J TAYLOR, CYNTHIA A TONCHAK, VIRGINIA S TAWSE, ARTHUR F JR 1233 CARACAS AVE 2629 JAPONICA DR 5 CHESTERS ST CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5025 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1022 DANVERS MA 01923 - 2729 TOPALOVIC, MIRSAD TREMBLAY, MARYJANE TRUEMNER, ROGER TOPALOVIC, DANIJELA 2633 PAGODA DR TRUEMNER, DOROTHY 1258 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 10288 BREWSTER BLVD S CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 GRAND BEND ON NOM 1T0 00030 - CANADA TRUST NO 1218 VIDALIS, ELLI VOJNIKOVIC, HASAN 13498 WALSINGHAM RD 10452 136TH ST VOJNIKOVIC, ESMA LARGO FL 33774 - 3527 LARGO FL 33774 - 5430 2565. BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017 WAGNER, JACK B & DOLORES J REV WHITACRE, JOYCE E WHYTE, GEORGE R 2630 JAPONICA DR 1224 CARACAS AVE WHYTE, CATHERINE L CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1021 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 2627 NAGANO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1026 WILSON, BARBARA E WILSON, TRUE WOOD, ELIZABETH M 1248 CARACAS AVE 1212 N KIMONA DR 2640 NAGANO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1050 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1025 ~YACKOSKI DEIDRE L WOOD, WILLIAM WRIGHT, JANICE M , YACKOSKI, ROBERT PO BOX 1714 1209 CARACAS AVE 1283 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1714 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5025 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 YOUNGBLOOD, CLARENCE L GOLDEN SHORELINE LTD PTNSH 1270 BURMA AVE 1225 DUBLIN RD SUNSET PONTIAC GMC TRUCKS INC CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 COLUMBUS OH 43215-1024 19320 US HWY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33764-3176 • • FLD2006-08047 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N AIITOWAY DODGE CLEARWA PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS ATLAS # 309B ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 08/30/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: ORIGINAL RECEIVED CCT 1 ~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER CLWCoverSheet Letter Of Trar~l~nittal Voice (954) 923-5838 Fax (954) 923-3838 TO: SHERRY WATKINS DELIVERY DATE:10/11/2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER -PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT :AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ROOM 210 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE #:11006 CLEARWATER FL 33756 RE:DRC SUBMITTAL PHONE #: 727-562-4582 FAX #: 954-384-4873 WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®ATTACHED ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA: UPS RED THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ^ SHOP DRAWINGS ®PLANS ^ SAMPLES ^ CHANGE ORDER ® PRINTS ®BOND SHEET(S) ^ VELLUM SHEET(S) ^ DISK v [~1/'~Alrl"1 a nrAl rr~ SETS ISS DATE SHT SIZE "~ """ "" DESCRIPTION 15 10/10/2006 18 8.5"X 11" LETTER REGARDING ACTIONS TAKEN TO PRE-DRC COMMENTS INCLUDING VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER & STORMWATER NARRATIVE 15 10/10/2006 21 24" X 36" A-0.0, SURVEY, A-1.0, A-2.0, A-3.0, A-3.1, A-3.2, A-3.3, A-3.4, L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5, L-6, CE-1, CE-2, CE-3, E-1.0, E-2.0, E-3.0 15 10/10/2006 27 8.5"X 11" UPDATED APPLICATIONS FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM INCLUDING COLOR DRAWINGS HESE ARE TRAN SMIT TED AS CHEC KED BE~C~W~ T ^ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ® FOR YOUR USE ^ AS REQUESTED ® FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT REMARKS: PLEASE FIND ATTACHED: THANK YOU! ^ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ^ APPROVED AS NOTED ^ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS HERRY: LEASE NOTE THAT THE CHECK FOR THE APPLICATION FEE OF $1,205 WAS INCLUDED IN HE ORIGINAL PACKAGE SENT ON AUGUST 29th ~,vrit~ i ~: Jt551GA WOOD (AUTONATION) BRAD HODGEN (HODGEN CONSTRUCTION) RECEIVED BY: DATE: (PLEASE SIGN) SIGNED: Enrique Gomez BY: ~~~Ilnkoy-Carmona CEIVED OCT 12 Z[~06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ® LTRT ®PREC ^ FAXT ®SHIP 125 pm Case Number: FLD2006-08~- 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N Owner(s): Autoway Dodge Clearwater 19400 Us Highway 19 N Clearwater, Fl 33764 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Arc Avenue Inc. 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood , Fl 33020 TELEPHONE: 954-923-5838, FAX: 954-868-9658, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Glenn B Giles 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood, Fl 33020 TELEPHONE: 954923-5838, FAX: 954-923-3838, E-MAIL: glenng@arcavenue.com Location: Atlas Page: 309B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development Approval to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building height from 25 to 36 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to I S feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) due to exceeding the 25% threshold, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the rear (west) landscape buffer from five feet to zero, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Section 3-1202. G. Proposed Use: Vehicle sales/displays, major Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email ~Pres ter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 2. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Recommend providing curb cuts into grass islands to create additional stormwater runoff attenuation; i.e. "retention cells" Fire: No Issues: Note-( This is not being reviewed as a building permit ) Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . The tree inventory was not legible, resubmit prior to CDB. 2 . Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide prior to CDB. 3 . All of the East Palatka Holly trees are diseased and removal is recommended. Show a one for one replacement prior to CDB. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 34 ~ 1 . See page L2. Land.,. 'aping is proposed in the sod/turf display area~Revise. 2 . Per Section 3-1403.B.1, No parking, displaying, or storing of motor vehicles shall be permitted on any grass or other unpaved area. 3 . East Palatka Holly are not allowed. Choose another species of tree. ~ Parks and Recreation: ~ 1 No issues -exterior and interior remodel of car dealership Stormwater: l , Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide area calculations showing that the amount of new square footage for the building addition is less than half the area being converted to grass at the new landscape islands. A cursory glance looks like this is being met but shall be mathematically demonstrated. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Provide 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway(s). There shall be no objects in the sight visibility triangles over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). General Note(s): 1}Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 35 ~ 1 Y roposed redevelopment in harmony with the`C~e, bulk, coverage, Re-Clarify. How is t ~ density, and character of adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. i ''~ Re-Clarify. How is the proposed redevelopment designed to minimize traffic congestion? 3 . Clarify. Your response to GA#5 indicates "includes upgrading all landscape to comply with current code." Yet, you have requested reduction to the landscaping through a Comprehensive Landscape plan. Revise this portion of the statement to reflect the minor reductions to the ~ landscape code. 4 . Provide documentation that the proposed redevelopment of the property has exceeded 25 percent of the value of only the primary structures on the property, as recorded through the Pinellas County Property Appraiser (727-464-3207). 5 . Clarify. You have indicated 163,450 square feet (3.75 acres) of vehicle display area. Can you provide a seperate 8.5 x 11 site plan showing this display area grayed out. A count of the display parking spaces on the site plan indicates 179 + or -. Based on a parking "~C~ space being approximately 200 square feet (10 feet wide by 20 feet in length) and the number of , _ display spaces being 179 that would give a total of 35;800 square foot of lot display area. 6 . Provide documentation of Unity of Title of the six listed parcels of land. 7 Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2 to reflect the deviations to existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum "~8~. building height. Otherwise the codes are met. Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #6e to reflect the deviations to existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum --~. building height. The entrance archway appears to be freestanding (not attached to the building). If this is correct, ~ the signage will than be considered freestanding signage, which could be an issue with the three existing freestanding signs on the property (one is allowed per Code). 10 . Provide detailed sign information for all signs on the site. Per Section 6-104, in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure... nonconforming signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. 11 . The new exterior building renovations need to be coordinated architecturally with the other buildings. Example: painted and trimed in similar colors. 12 . Per Section 3-1302.B, All outdoor light fixtures shall be located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow. Demonstrate how the lighting along US 19 frontage is going to meet this requirement at 86 foot candles. 13 . Per Section 3-1402.B. There shall be no more than one entrance and one exit or one combined entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 36 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 October 02, 2006 GLENN B GILES 2341 HOLLYWOOD BLVD HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020 VIA FAX: 954-923-3838 RE: FLS2005-12103 LOCATED AT - 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N Dear : GLENN B GILES The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-12103. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, October 5, 2006 Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that maybe generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, John Schodtler, Planner II cc: File ~~~ ~ DRC Pre-DRC Comments Mail Out ,,,r~ V tiT~~~~rf ~'~~~`~~~ ~~' Conditions Associated With .~ "~--~~~,,G: ' ~t~~ FLD2006-08047 ~~ ~. ' 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N '~ , f~~'~i~F Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 09/19/2006 1. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy Not Met site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 2. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for, Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle ~ 562-4897 09/22/2006 Recommend providing curb cuts into grass islands to create additional stormwater runoff Not Met attenuation; i.e. "retention cells" Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 09/21/2006 No Issues: Note-( This is not being reviewed as a building permit) Not Met Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 09/22/2006 See page L2. Landscaping is proposed in the sod/turf display areas. Revise. Not Met 09/22/2006 Per Section 3-1403.8.1, No parking, displaying, or storing of motor vehicles shall be permitted on Not Met any grass or other unpaved area. 09/22/2006 East Palatka Holly are not allowed. Choose another species of tree. Not Met Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 09/22/2006 The tree inventory was not legible, resubmit prior to CDB. Not Met 09/22/2006 Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hardwoods is Not Met one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide prior to CDB. 09/22/2006 All of the East Palatka Holly trees are diseased and removal is recommended. Show a one for Not Met one replacement prior to CDB. Parks 8~ Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 09/19/2006 No issues -exterior and interior remodel of car dealership Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 09/20/2006 Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide area calculations showing that the Not Met amount of new square footage for the building addition is less than half the area being converted to grass at the new landscape islands. A cursory glance looks like this is being met but shall be mathematically demonstrated. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 09/15/2006 Prior to a Building Permit: Not Met 1. Provide 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway(s). There shall be no objects in the sight visibility triangles over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Print Date: 10/02/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 FLD2006-08047 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Applicability Criteria #1 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 09/02/2006 Re-Clarify. How is the proposed redevelopment in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. General Applicability Criteria #4 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 09/02/2006 Re-Clarify. How is fhe proposed redevelopment designed to minimize traffic congestion? General Applicability Criteria #5 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Not Met Not Met 09/02/2006 Clarify. Your response to GA#5 indicates "includes upgrading all landscape to comply with current Not Met code." Yet, you have requested reduction to the landscaping through a Comprehensive Landscape plan. Revise this portion of the statement to reflect the minor reductions to the landscape code. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 09/01/2006 Provide documentation that the proposed redevelopment of the property has exceeded 25 percent Not Met of the value of only the primary structures on the property, as recorded through the Pinellas County Property Appraiser (727-464-3207). 09/08/2006 Clarify. You have indicated 163,450 square feet (3.75 acres) of vehicle display area. Can you Not Met provide a seperate 8.5 x 11 site plan showing this display area grayed out. A count of the display parking spaces on the site plan indicates 179 + or -. Based on a parking space being approximately 200 square feet (10 feet wide by 20 feet in length) and the number of display spaces being 179 that would give a total of 35,800 square foot of lot display area. 09/01/2006 Provide documentation of Unity of Title of the six listed parcels of land. Not Met 09/02/2006 Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2 to reflect the deviations to Not Met existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum building height. Otherwise the codes are met. 09/02/2006 Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #6e to reflect the deviations to Not Met existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum building height. 09/22/2006 The entrance archway appears to be freestanding (not attached to the building). If this is correct, Not Met the signage will than be considered freestanding signage, which could be an issue with the three existing freestanding signs on the property (one is allowed per Code). 09/22/2006 Provide detailed sign information for all signs on the site. Per Section 6-104, in the event a Not Met building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure... nonconforming signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. 09/22/2006 The new exterior building renovations need to be coordinated architecturally with the other Not Met buildings. Example: painted and trimed in similar colors. Print Date: 10/02/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 FLD2006-08047 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 09/22/2006 Per Section 3-1302.6, All outdoor light fixtures shall be located so that objects or land which are Not Met located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow. Demonstrate how the lighting along US 19 frontage is going to meet this requirement at 86 foot candles. 09/22/2006 Per Section 3-1402.8. There shall be no more than one entrance and one exit or one combined Not Met entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. Print Date: 10/02/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~c~ C A~~N U E ARCHITECTURE DESIGN BUILD COMPUTER AIDED FACILITY MANAGEMENT October 11, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Attn: John Schodtler, Planner II RE: Autoway Dodge -Clearwater (FLD2006-08047) 19400 US Highway 19 N Clearwater, FL 33764, Actions Taken to DRC Comments Mr. John Schodtler: FL LICENSE #AA.0001217 Listed below please find Actions Taken on our plans in response to the comments issued with your letter dated 10/02/06 along with items discussed during our meeting last week. Please refer to the attached set of plans issued on 10/11/06 and identified as DRC Comments. Engineering Condition from Steve Doherty, 09/19/2006: C1. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and / or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. R1. No new building square footage is being added as part of this renovation, pervious area (landscape) has been increased by 30% from the existing 82,023 SF (aprox.); therefore no increase in capacity is required from water main and wastewater systems. C2. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. S:1Project\Project\2006pj\11006 Autoway Dodge- Clearwater Site Plan\b106\Actions Taken Ltr 101106.doc ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~. ~ 12 C~O6 PLANl~IN~ facPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAR~NATER R2. The above is acknowledged 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 • 954-923-5838 • FAX 954-923-3838 • WWW.ARCAVENUE.COM • • Environmental Condition from Heather Faessle. 0912212006: C 1. Recommend providing curb cuts into grass islands to create additional storm water runoff attenuation; i. e. "retention cells" R1. Considering that we are increasing the pervious area (landscape) by 30% from the existing 82,023 SF (aprox.) and creating a new retention area (see sheet CE-2), we feel that your recommendation is not necessary and it would expose the landscape material within the islands to erosion. Fire Condition from James Keller. 0912112006: C1. No Issues -Note: This is not being reviewed as a building permit Landscape Condition from John Schodtler. 09122/2006: C1. See page L2. Landscaping is proposed in the sod/tun` display areas. Revise. Existing concrete display areas have been indicated to remain and landscaping is no longer in conflict. C . Per Section 3-1403.8.1, No parking, displaying, or storing d motor vehicles shall be permitted on any grass or other unpaved area. R2. Display areas are only on existinglproposed paved surfaces. ~C3. East Palatka Holly are not allowed. Choose another species of tree. 'v R3. Although Div 12 Sect 8-102 does not list the East Palatka Holly as prohibited, per your request we will change the proposed East Palatka Hollies to another tree, such as Purple Tabebuia, Carolina Cherry Laurel, or Crape Myrtle. I can find no list of suggestions in the Clearwater Code. ORIGINAL Land and Resources Condition from Rick Albee. 09/22/2006: RECEIVED C1. The tree inventory was not legible, resubmit prior to CDB. OCT 12 2~U6 R1. A clearer copy is provided in the attached set of plans PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C2. ,Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for h~Cdwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide prior to ~~ ~ R2. ~iese will be provided. 2 S:1Project\Project\2006pj\11006 Autoway Dodge- Clearwater Site Plan\b106Wctions Taken Ltr 101106.doc 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 • 954-923-5838 • FAX 954-923-3838 • WWW.ARCAVENUE.COM • • C3. All of the East Palatka Holly trees are diseased and removal is recommended. S ne for one replacement prior to CDB. R We will sho all these hollies to be replaced, per tree species choice in the ~` ~--~ third comme t under "Landscape". ~~ ~ Parks and Recreational Condition from Debbie Reid. 09/19/2006: C1. No issues -exterior and interior remodel of car dealership. Storm Water Condition from Bob Maran. 09/20/2006: C1. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide area calculations showing that the amount of new square footage for the building addition is less than half the area being converted to grass at the new landscape islands. A cursory glance looks like this is being met but shall be. R1. No new building square footage is being added as part of this renovation and in fact there is reduction of building area since we are demolishing an existing small building on site. Traffic Engineering Condition from Bennett Elbo. 09/15/2006: C 1. Prior to Building Permit: 1. Provide 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway(s). There shall be no objects in the sight visibility triangles over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904) forthcoming upon submiftal of a Building Permit Application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED R1. The above has been added to the Site Plan accordingly ~C f 12 2L~06 General Applicability Criteria from John Schodtler, 09/0212006: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C1. Re-Clarify. How is the proposed redevelopment in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties? Reply to each separately. R1. Answer to the above item has been clarified. See revised page of General Applicability Criteria responses included in the attached application. C4. Re-Clarify. How is the proposed redevelopment designed to minimize traffic congestion? ~ R4. Answer to the above item has been clarified. See revised page of General Applicability Criteria responses included in the attached application. 3 S:\Project\Project\2006pj\11006 Autoway Dodge- Clearwater Site Plan\b106Wctions Taken Ltr 101106.doc 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 • 954-923-5838 • FAX 954-923-3838 • WWW.AR(AVENUE.COM • w C5. Clarify. Your response to GA#5 indicates "includes upgrading all landscape to comply with current code. " Yet, you have requested reduction to the landscaping through a Comprehensive Landscape plan. Revise this portion of the statement to reflect the minor reductions to the landscape code R5. Suggested changes have been incorporated into the revised letter requesting the Variance (see attached landscape application) Zoning Condition from John Schodtler. 09/01/2006. 09/02/06, 09/08/06. 8~ 09/22/06: C1. Provide documentation that the proposed redevelopment of the property has exceeded 25 percent of the value of only the primary structures on the property, as recorded through the Pinellas County Property Appraiser (727-464-3207). R1. Please see attached documentation from the above showing the requested information as follows: Existing building Cost: ORIGINAL $559,390 RECENEp $135,530 $111 520 Q~'T , 121[~O6 $59,080 $96,920 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 141 190 CITY OF CLFARWATER TOTAL COST: $1,103,630 25% of the above total is $275,907. The proposed project cost is $750,000 which exceeds the 25% threshold C2. Clarify. You have indicated 163,450 square feet (3.75 acres) of vehicle display area. Can you provide a separate 8.5 x 11 site plan showing this display area grayed out? A count of the display parking spaces on the site plan indicates 179 + or -; Based on a parking space being approximately 200 square feet. (10 feet wide by 20 feet in length) and the number of display spaces being 179 that would give a total of 35, 800 square foot of lot display area. R2. Please refer to revised parking calculations on sheet A-1.0. The display spaces total 249 and they are shown with a crosshatch. Therefore the display area is 49,800 SF. Based on that number the required customer parking would be 2.5 spaces / 1,000 SF of display area = 125 spaces. 4 S:\Project\Project12006pj\11006 Autoway Dodge- Clearwater Site Plan\b106\Actions Taken Ltr 101106.doc 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 • 954-923-5838 • FAX 954-923-3838 • WWW.ARCAVENUE.COM • • C3. Provide documentation of Unity of Title of the six listed parcels of land. R3. As per Planning Department Manager Neil Thompson the above "...doesn't need to be done prior to application but will be a condition or approval...". Please refer to attached copy of a-mail documenting the above statement. C4. Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2 to reflect the deviations to existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum building height. Otherwise the codes are met. R4. Answer to the above item has been clarified. See revised page of responses to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria included - in the attached application. t C5. Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #6e to reflect the deviations to existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum building height. R5. Answer to the above item has been clarified. See revised page of responses to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria included in the attached application. C6. The entrance archway appears to be freestanding (not attached to the building). If this is correct, the signage will than be considered freestanding signage, which could be an issue with the three existing freestanding signs on the property (one is allowed per Code). R6. The above has been corrected in the elevations to clearly show that the entrance archway structure is attached to the building. C7. Provide detailed sign information for all signs on the site. Per Section 6-104, in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal ~ use/structure nonconforming signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. ~--------~R7. Please refer to existing sign details on sheet A-1.0 .f C8. The new exterior building renovations need to be coordinated architecturally with / the other buildings. Example: painted and trimmed in similar colors. G R8. Refer to note on sheet A-1.0: "Please note that all existing buildings on site either currently match or will be repainted to match color scheme and detailing of building A" ORIGINAL RECENED k~~;T 12 Zt~~6 5 PtANNlNG I}EPARt~11AEN ~ S:\Project\Project\2006pj\11006 Autoway Dodge- Clearwater Site Plan\b106\Actions Taken Ltr 101106.do~~ OF CLE:ARVUATF~ 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 • 954-923-5838 • FAX 954-923-3838 • WWW.ARCAVENUE.COM ~ ~ C9. Per Section 3-1302.8, All outdoor light fixtures shall be located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow. Demonstrate how the lighting along US 19 frontage is going to meet. R9. Please refer to note on sheet E-3.0: "Light fixtures are cut off type luminaries and will not spill an appreciable amount of light behind the light fixtures as shown below:" C10. Per Section 3-1402.8. There shall be no more than one entrance and one exit or one combined entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. R10. One building is to be removed as part of this project, all proposed work being conducted within property. No traffic pattern accessing the site will be altered. Currently all entrances are being used for their intended use and are to remain. The southernmost entry allows access to the service drive. The next entrance to the north is used for new car sales customer '~ parking. The next entrance accommodates used car parking. The northern most entry is for access to administrative offices. All traffic will continue to exit the property right turn only along US 19. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (954) 923-5838. rdial , Glenn B. Giles, AIA Architect, President On behalf of ARC Avenue, Inc. GBG/ttc Cc: Jessica Wood, Autonation Brad Hodgen, Hodgen Construction File ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2[06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAIER 6 S:\Project\Project\2006pj\11006 Autoway Dodge- Clearwater Site Plan\b106Wctions Taken Ltr 101106.doc 2341 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 • 954-923-5838 • FAX 954-923-3838 • WWW.ARCAVENUE.COM • DESICIN SCApES OF IO~IANASOTA, INC. 7840 FRUITVIL~E ROAd SARASOTA, FL 34240 (941) 343-6161 FAX (941) 343.9450 October 11.2006 Sarasota City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater. FL 33756 I .. LIC.#LC26000196 LIC. #16121181 Re: Autoway Dodge -Clearwater Addendum to Comprehensive Landscape Program Application & Variance Request Dear Sir or Madam. This letter is presented as an addendum to the Comprehensive Landscape Program Application for this project. Response to item #la is as follows: This project is designed per City of Clearwater code requirements in keeping with the nature of an Automobile Sales facility. The design intent is to beauti fy the grounds; create a positive appearance from the streets and neighboring properties and also limit the amount of organic litter on the vehicles. In addition we have provided all landscape buffers as regtured per code. However. we hereby request a variance for a minor reduction of landscape buffers in the following two locations: 1) Reduction of landscape buffer dimension from 10' to 5' on North side of property along Tropic Hills Drive. 2) Reduction of landscape buffer from 5' to 0' along a small portion of the South property line, measuruig 270 LF. The reason for the above request is due to existing conditions that do not allow sufficient space to accommodate the required width fortwo-way traffic flow. Bringing the existing Landscape buffers into compliance in those locations would make it impossible to have enough room to accommodate the required 24 foot width for t~vo-way traffic. ORIGINAL RECENED Q~T 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~ F.P'L Oo Cr~Q~,4 ,, ®_ a ~~ ~ I~~JI~''V~nI`~I q - A~ Design J anasota, CIATEDLANDSC~@~Srr~CnCIORSOFAMERICA `P,yua'^u P" 0/10/200 ItieKnoxli'Ga~Grnx•: to^°^r¢ industry I'rnl'essiunal • • V-~e trust these changes, taken ~ contea~t with the major improvements throughout the comple3;, will prove satisfactory in complywith the Landscape ordinance. Sin rely J es R. Gic~e ~, RLA, ASLA resident ORIGINAL RECEIVED OOT 12 Z[~O6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Design Stapes of Manasota, Inc. Page 2 10/10/2006 ^ l~. GGB En g, 3109 Stirling Road, Spite 201 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312 •- - = Ph: (954) 986-9899 • Fax (954) 986-6655 ,_. .. `._.. ._, emaIl:ggbeng@beIlsouth.net ~~ .-..y... .3 ~ ~u - ,.~~,j AT~JT®i~AY DODGE +CLEAI2WA'~R 19400 US Haghway 19 North CLEARWATER, FLGRIDA August 30, 2006 ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'GIN QF CLEARWATER The existing 13.17 Acre Autoway Dodge site will be augmented and enhanced by the conversion of 27,902 square feet of impervious paved surface to pervious green and landscaped surface. Approximately, 3,809 of existing pervious surface will be converted to impervious paved surface, realizing a gain of 24,093 ,square feet, of pervious landscaped surfaces for the total site. The existing site which is building and pavement i~ensive is being relaxed with the addition of raised landscaped islands and green areas to soften up the massive impervious areas that now the exist. The existing pavement areas will be repaired and resurfaced as required. so that overland runoff is directed to the urternal drainage network, which wz"J1 remain. Where pavement low points exist without sufficient collection basins, additional catch basins and interconnected 15" HDPE piping are being added which discharge to an enhanced landscaped retention area. Due to the reduction of a net 24,093 square feet of impervious pavement area to pervious landscaped areas, the project rainfall ranoffpercentages will be decreased, the ground storage will increase and the resultant storm water flood stages will be reduced. Therefore, the stem water system as exists, and as augmented, wi11 be receiving a reduced. amount of runoff and will thus be more efficient and operational. Augmentation of the .existing drainage collection system will include, curbing around existing inlets to assure the continuity of the existing grading network, the addition of inlets at existing pavement low points subject to flooding, as well as the addition of an enhanced retention and Landscaped area to accept discharge from the added catch basins. A storm water pollution preve~rtion plan will also be put into place during pavement removal and excavation operations. . The existing drainage system, as augmented and improved, w~l continue to fanction as originally designed and installed with a reduced amount of runoff coatn`buting. to the _ system due to the conversion of existing pavement areas to landscaped and green areas:. CNIL AND FORENSIC ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS V'~;yr~ Enrique Gomez `From J ~neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:31 PM To: james.wagner@myclearwater.com; enriqueg@arcavenue.com Subject: RE: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER -QUESTION REGARDING UNITY OF TITLE Yes~All parcels within the scope. of the application. It doesn't need to be done prior to application, but will be a condition of: ;approval. Neil Thompson; -----Original Message----- From: Wagner, James Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:27 PM To: 'Enrique Gomez' Subject: RE: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER -QUESTION REGARDING UNITY OF TITLE Hello Enrique, I am going to forward this to our Planning Department Manager. They will be able to answer your questions. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Enrique Gomez [mailto:enriqueg@arcavenue.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:52 PM To: Wagner, James Cc: brad@hodgenconstruction.com; Glenn Giles; FILE Subject: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER -QUESTION REGARDING UNITY OF TITLE James: This is in regard the above project which was presented to you at the pre-development meeting (BPRC) that took place on 6-21-06 with the attendance of our office Principal, Glenn Giles. I have included a PDF file showing the proposed Site Plan for your reference. We have a question regarding the Flexible Development Application which wE are planning to submit next Wednesday, August 30th. Our client, Autonation, does not want to execute a Unity of Title for the 6 parcels that compose the property. Is this document required for the Flexible Development application in this particular project? Your timely response will be greatly appreciated. You may call me at my cell phone (954-562-4268) or office (954- 923-5838). Thank you. Sincerely, Enrique Gomez Pro'ect Architect ~~ ~~ Y 1111111114!! !l1ii4 IIf4! SMef NI d•tt/ Oi1MtEE Lk44Gl~il+1 2341 Hollywood Blvd. -Hollywood, FL Ph: 954-923-5838 /Fax: 954-923-3838 E-mail: enriqueg@arcavenue.com Mobile phone: 954-562-4268 ORIGINAL RECEIVEd QCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 16r 11;'3005 16: ~. ~ ~ Z74643aat~ ' "~ ~ "' . `_ -~ '~ ' ' Ta. From: Telephone #~ fax ~: ,:~ .~ ~ .-.~ ~~~~ . .....Date: Time: ' Property.Appraiser ~ : , . P.o. BaX X957 CI~I=ARWATEFJ, FLORIDA 33757-1957 Telefe.x T~ansmittai Fornn ~~~~ ~. Department: Direct Phone #; ~ ~ ~ ~ ' RECEII/E~3 Number of Pages including this covey}: ~ ~ C~,T 12 2[06 . ~ ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT N ote~: ~.. , R Jf there sre any problems with this transmission, please .call (727} a64-4290 vL ~ nl~w.~,~ OF'F1CE PHONE; 7Z7 46d~-3207 • HEARING IMPAIRED: 727 464.3370 • FAX: 727 464-3448 Web Site -~tt~'l/nao.co.pinell~-s.fl.us ~ E-mail - jsmith ~'pcpao.org ' gd16BG•a~StnifOnrum~ntslocolfeyaralFey4Fohheand7emplatoslLET7'L-'AH[-AD~Fnx.MA°ter-i~Aanuai.do~ Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information ORIGINAL .Back to Search Page .fin explanation of this screen ~~T 12 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r~~, , Z?ETAIL VALVE: ~ECGRL~. . l ^p' 1. o (~CaS;)Gt;a X ~-~~ c"„)1. ~~G C~! : G y. ..,+...vArMNn.NNhrlrry+vtiNNNNNNti IyN NNRVN~y/VNNfY'~f~1fNIyNN1fN ' G w. I . Jr IV 11.rN~y~r N11,yJlf~vNn, Nf~f^I^"NN NNN•r+~+~/fYN Nrltn' ~ ' ~~.aCt~ RATA ~`~)%)q, DATA ~ - ' 4 I s~4 Imprau~men.~ t ~ ~,Gv i 5.~ . ~lclit.ts;.ed nna,r,~s ~ bC~„~~ I' ~+es.~G 'i Erase r~ ~e ' C)G~ . I ~ '. CMG f . Ci pe c a. ~.~ I ra, t.e bta ~ ~~ t 4E, n .:,.;~ I •Ad~ . ~~~se rasp ~ ~~~ . I ~. 5 0 ~ „5 ~ 4i:`,.~ I i ~~.~ ~Li~ ect ~. 4~ s o ^ I ~,4; 4t i ' 7 2Q~ r, t„~q.? 1 ,. Gross ~~ '~°At Nornia.~ pt,ysical. clepreca..~i~x~ri ' ~ ~~.o'C-C~ • ~. i ~ ~ ~~C)Ctt; t ,~ I . . Add' 1 phvsa. cal c}~pre~i:a'L ~, c-n 1 - ~~ i , . ~ , U _ Econom:C G ' c)bs ~ . I ,.bOt'~~` I cC~C)t~ . 'p=~G~r~t cjot,d _~~^ c~~- ~ : ~ ~_-- a~.~~_ _ __- 1 !~C~S ~. ~T~7 r'7 ~ !~ ~~ ry. ~ ~1G I ' REP t;~.)~T DEP: ~ . } ~ti6u ~ 17^ , r - 1 ~ ~ n ~'1 t_ ~ - . XFE~E' tJ~1LUE,~.._ . : . rf1Ahl~l-IF_5~,......._... c~arrJ ~ ~ (W~ ual.ue r '~~mpu~ta~ta:tar~s ~ Z ? men t.t ~ . e . (v? ~a1,ue ORIGINAL RECENED ' ~ ~ OCT 12 206 ' ~ ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER . r _ ~ •~ . 7 A7 DETAIL VAGUE REC01?~? . y _ _ y /~ a /~ rT~ {~, I 7 n•~ ,I~p ~}i,~~,J14t~ J. 'T ~~ t~J ~•4~1~1 LL'i ~I L~ I IVIVNNNNNNIIffVMMiVMhNNNf~nNIYNIYA~IVNN.NfyMNgr+lllVJl. MIV V 'VV , ti NIVNNNNIII~ffk N141V IVNNN/VN nr fk/y NJVNN NNIVNNhf S RATA U~ ~~:~4~~ AAT'A . ~C ~ tmpra~emer7•L• •r.yp.~, I~~ l I~c+ I . ACjjl.1.'•~2~ pO:Lrt'~~ 1 ?.r"1w~iV~ i3 CJ (' w t:l ~~ I. ~r4R~y~'. Aria base rate ~ ~c~ 7 ( .' 7,176 I Ff-f`~c~a.ve sq TePt, .. ,. . 9,54 t.. R,.:~S4 t ~ GroSS .S~q fee k hiol^mal ph~•s~.c~7• depreca.a•~a.ar~ ^ w^'P~r.!~}; ~:~~r17~~ I I'. . I Q I Add' ~ phy~ica.l ~ clepr~ci,tion t^~ . t `-y I P"~.~n~~:a,c~r~~:3 obs fir ~ I .. c~ I 5 X4:11:1 Percent ~oncJ __~ ~F~-_----- I -- ~ ~. =____=. _ _= I ' ' I~{E4ti) FtE.P~~ COS I ~5, ~3~~~~ ~ 1?~, ; $1 ~~ I I•. P,E~F CAST DEP , ~-~ ~~ 1 I FS~ VALLi~ .. EoRANCHES • ~v) ~a7.ue ~ree~rc~ (V~)val~.t~? GomP~-itatioris SZ~mer~u ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2L~06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,. 10;'11.'2005 16:.1 ! . ~ 14b~i.~FF'i~+ ~ -. .._ . • ._ ~ i R~ DETA1 L, vALUE F'~l"rCGI~D ~ ~ ' Lq L 7 '.1. i~ i,J i,J i~O1.J il~(„J o1.~~7 C~ M ~~ NNMNfV ,n.N/VNn+I1rN+4A.NNNN f1fNN NN111h/MNryNN NNfYlfflr V N~V ~ftiru / 1f^/^.+yNNNNNM"4NNNNNNN Nhf~-NN NIVfVNNN 2t:~CJ ~ DATr~ / ~ ~ ~JQ+q~ DATA `n ;.~~> i Ja { xmproveme,nt tyke, -- 3,1~ I ~.^~~ : 1 pd j~,t•~.~ed aa.n'~~ p ~r ~» I ~i ^.a;;.~.1 b7 x'75 I. F~~;tse T-ate r L70 I , .cap I . 5pecia:l ra~:e ~ f";s.~:sq. I S~I•rbq 1. Adj b~SP. r~•te .. ! ~~.is ! E ~ •s e c. t i, 4 .---- ., ~. ~ .., ~ r,~aS .. ~, ~ ~ I 'f~'~t GT o55 SCE Normal physa.ca~. depre~i,:~tiori I . a.7~~ I . . 17bt:f U ' ArJdf 1 phy~si.~=~1 ~depr~cizta.ar~ I t~~ ~ ~ , I rLlnG•~1Dric'1~ Olls ~ I ~. C1 . {~) I E~nnoma, c obe . B3DQ I ~ B3i:~i3 Percent good __=^~s_...._ I _a,~: ___=_~_~^.._..__= I a.,~~, ~ ~ COST hIE~ REp { ~.1 L ~ 5~S?~~ b4 v ~'r'GJ REP COST DEP -_ r~ I ~~ I • GCSE{ t1Al.UE ~t~A•NCHES d ZW)y,alue ~ cpmpu'1;at~,on4. (Z) menu (V) v.~~lue recnr ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2~U6 ~' fl: .PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF. CL<rARWATER 10:'11!2065 16: 1 r r27464~4a~. ` ~ ~ ``~ ~ ~~ ~~ _._ _ .. _- ~~ Ai D D~R RL JALUE IiE'TA ~ L ti // ~nT ` ~ r1 '{ 1° .:.~ 16 ~~i.~t~J I.J ~I .1 A•C) ~~.h (~[l C; Y}1'1 ~~~ ^'JNN IVNNIVMIV NnI+VMJ1fMNIVMNry • /Y J1f MIV I~.NN NNMtiIVIVNN(V •YIVN IyI~.NIVNNIyNMIVNNNNJy IkNIVNN~1f11~IyNN NNJV NIYN '``t705 ~flTF~ .. . ~~~~ DATFi . Tmprc~v~mer~1: •~YPe ~ ~ iiC~ ( a. J.G I AcI;ILt4'rPd poirtits• ~ ,,,,~ ~5 _ I .~.r' ~ .?~~~~~:y I __ „. ease rate I ~ . G :CSC,! .I . ~peci zl .rate ~ I .c.E~r~ 1.~ A• . ^C~ I Ad,j Lase r~~~ . . ,:ar~ ... I 5 7 f - .q. ~ 7nG . Effie.C•~ i ve sq '•teE•~• -- . , ~, .77'q I' ~ b , i i ~ i Norma7.' phusi,cal depreci,~'~i,~n q ~R6~C ~ ~ ~} I ~fldd' 1 ~hvs;i~c~,1 de•~reca,~~i.on ~ i ~ p I F Ll ry C'~ ;l D tti c~ ~, O ~ :i^ ..~~ I C7 I ~COI'1bfT11C atl5 ~ rA4CaCS' ... .... I •~:~+4bl.) I Per~Qr,t yaod _~_- _ _ __ -- =-==1 w- - -=__===-___----- 1 - . _ - s•- ~.-- _ ---=T=~ . - 3.~~FytB~~ 1.1S.:a°U EW REP . CS5 f~ ~ ~ S9,GGCS~~ 5li ~ ~7U REP CDST DEP _ (7 I C~ , • I XFS~ WALUE HRAF~ICNES (V 1 ve.1LtE record C~W) va1~(e campu~a~ 7. oral - t Z) mera~t ORIGINAL . RECENEQ . ~CCT 12 2L~Ofi . PIpNNIN CD~ARWA ERT - - CITY OF . 16:'11;`'/k119b 1b:1! rGfwotia.r-.u • ` {._ = • s ~.-a~~-~~i:~~ a15. A7 RD . Cg D5?~1Z L VALUF_ R~ _ • ~n (^~ /'y • • ~~ ~9 ib ~•1 V\.~t~~~ 1~{'t7 lJ ~'++" iwf~~ (_l ~1 NNIVN~^ IVNNI~INNNNNNlV IVNti/~rIYNNIN N NNN NNN~4l4NN NNNN'Nht .y^~NNN NNNn1I.yl4NNN NNNN.y N~VNNN~11'MN/VN ~c~t'~ y Dt-1~'~, ^~7U4 DATA 7mprc~vemen'~ types ~ 1~~1 { ' l,c~e I Ad~u:~tec~ paini;s___.. ^a.75 1 L~~~?~~ { Ease rc~'te .. uQ ..I . ~>cs I Spec:'t~l raise ~ ,,,,.56.5 I ?3.7fa I Ad,i ba~E rare b~9 I 6- 6 ~ 6~~1 I ~T•feC~ave 5th Tek?t p ~,~744 I •~>,,744 Grn~ss. ~q fEet; _- P+lorm~l phy5~.r~7. depr~~i{~i;i,~n ~4.:;b.t~ .. . ... I 1 ..q.,:tirjC~. 1 • c:~ { A~1d' 1' ptiv4ir~,~1 iJ~pr~cia~i;on ~ ~a ~ I : (j I Funct,i~nal af~s .D .I G I ~C~+r~atnie Ot4 574.1 ( ..5'TC~i~ { , _~ _~~__ -_T_.__~~- _--_~~. ~=-~7t;~ CJ~,G I ~ ~ 15.7,51tr I t`IC4~ - REP~ Ct7Sfi " of ~~ 1 9b' '. , ~ ..I?° , 78C~ I 'REP C.05T DEP,_ . C- I t~ XF5H VAl.U1= HP,At~1CH~5 ue d {~?~~'tl ~ ~omputa•~~.~ns (z ? me r~ u . . ~(t1? value recnr • ~ ~ ORIGINAL RECEIVED ' ~ OCT 12 2L~05 PI„ANNING DEPARTMENT. • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER 10,'11/?,005 16:1- r"ilctt~4:yr+ge . - ~ ., ,~ ~ ..•~ .-,.. ...-- --• -- P F17 DETA~ L VA1_UE::, RECORD , X ° ,~ 9 9, b CPC~U~:~C~ :I. ~I~C~ ~1 G~4 CD G U6 N N NNNJY'N/UN NN/YNKI"V N'~h.N IUNN N I~iti~JVhh.NN N NMwrrX~lrJUJW N N N~r~4~4'k NI\.N Iv N+V N NnI MNJ~rti NNN N N~V ~VNNJI. XJN N ;~t7~s~, 'pATA ;~~~~,q. DATA ]Improvement ~yFje.~..~.._-„.. ~ ~ 1 ~.~ ~ ~.it'? ~ Ad,jusi~ecl pC~i,rit~~. ~ . .. 7G ~ ~ ~ ~? «~ot:a J . ~ ~a~e rata ~ . C1U ~ •'~'~ ~ S~zcial rake ?~,'~ 1~ . ~ ~q,_~p A•c(i bate rate . ' ~ i~79; 1 E,~73. I . Effective mac{ feati_ ~ ~ G'ro~s..nc~ feed ~lormal Phy~acal deprec~,~ta.c~n ~ .1~,41Cy .11C7~w~ ~ I c , Add'1 physical dp~reci~tian '. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ « ~ Fur~ctiana~. obs_ -- ~7 • C~ I C7; 89~d ~ F'ercer~~ good, ~ r~~~__ I -~z~,~~~~_~_~~~_~~~. - ~ . ~ ^ ' ~ _ I~EW REP CpwT 1 ~FJ. " 1 °S-ti~" 76c:- ! ~ 1..:tU ° . REP COST DEF ' Ca i 4? ~ XFSP ~f~LLIE _ BRANCHES (V) value record t4J)ua3.ue comp~.t~~~Gi,drr~ ' (Z)menu . ~ • ORIGINAL - .RECEIVED • ocT 12 Zoos . PLANNING DEPARTMEN 1 • ~ CIN OF CI.EARWATER 9 . 9'00 am Case Number: FLD2006-08047 -- 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N Owner(s): Autoway Dodge Clearwater 19400 Us Highway 19 N Clearwater, Fl 33764 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Arc Avenue Inc. 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood , Fl 33020 TELEPHONE: 954-923-5838, FAX: 954-868-9658, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Glenn B Giles 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood, Fl 33020 TELEPHONE: 954923-5838, FAX: 954-923-3838, E-MAIL: glenng@arcavenue.com Location: Atlas Page: 309B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development Approval to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building height from 25 to 36 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) due to exceeding the 25% threshold, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the rear (west) landscape buffer from five feet to zero, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Section 3-1202. G. Proposed Use: Vehicle sales/displays, major Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No issues. Environmental: 1 , Recommend grass islands to be incorporated with cut curbs for additional stormwater runoff attenuation;" retention cells" Fire: No Issues: Note-( This is not being reviewed as a building permit ) Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . The tree inventory was not legible, resubmit prior to CDB. 2 . Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The genera] rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide prior to CDB. 3 . All of the East Palatka Holly trees are diseased and removal is recommended. Show a one for one replacement prior to CDB. Landscaping: 1 _ See page L2. Landscaping is proposed in the sod/turf display areas. Revise. 2 . Per Section 3-1403.B.1, No parking, displaying, or storing of motor vehicles shall be permitted on any grass or other unpaved area. 3 . East Palatka Holly are not allowed. Choose another species of tree. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues -exterior and interior remodel of car dealership Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 5 Stormwater: u 1 , Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide area calculations showing that the amount of new square footage for the building addition is less than half the area being converted to grass at the new landscape islands. A cursory glance looks like this is being met but shall be mathematically demonstrated. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Provide 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway(s). There shall be no objects in the sight visibility triangles over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1 . Re-Clarify. How is the proposed redevelopment in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. 2 . Re-Clarify. How is the proposed redevelopment designed to minimize traffic congestion? 3 . Clarify. Your response to GA#5 indicates "includes upgrading all landscape to comply with current code." Yet, you have requested reduction to the landscaping through a Comprehensive Landscape plan. Revise this portion of the statement to reflect the minor reductions to the landscape code. 4 . Provide documentation that the proposed redevelopment of the property has exceeded 25 percent of the value of only the primary structures on the property, as recorded through the Pinellas County Property Appraiser (727-464-3207). 5 . Clarify. You have indicated 163,450 square feet (3.75 acres) of vehicle display area. Can you provide a seperate 8.5 x 11 site plan showing this display area grayed out. A count of the display parking spaces on the site plan indicates 179.+ or -. Based on a parking space being approximately 200 square feet (10 feet wide by 20 feet in length) and the number of display spaces being 179 that would give a total of 35,800 square foot of lot display area. 6 . Provide documentation of Unity of Title of the six listed parcels of land. 7 . Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redeve]opment Project Criteria #2 to reflect the deviations to existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum building height. Otherwise the codes are met. 8 . Revise, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #6e to reflect the deviations to existing pavement and landscape buffer reductions and the request to increase the maximum building height. 9 . The entrance archway appears to be freestanding (not attached to the building). If this is correct, the signage will than be considered freestanding signage, which could be an issue with the three existing freestanding signs on the property (one is allowed per Code). 10 . Provide detailed sign information for all signs on the site. Per Section 6-104, in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure... nonconforming signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. 1 I . The new exterior building renovations need to be coordinated architecturally with the other buildings. Example: painted and trimed in similar colors. 12 . Per Section 3-1302.B, All outdoor light fixtures shall be located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow. Demonstrate how the lighting along US 19 frontage is going to meet this requirement at 86 foot candles. 13 . Per Section 3-1402.B. There shall be no more than one eutrance and one exit or one combined entrance and exit per property along any street un]ess otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 6 • Other: ' No Comments Notes: • Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 7 Clearwater September 08, 2006 Glenn B Giles 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood, F133020 VIA FAX: 954-923-3838 RE: FLD2006-08047 -- 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N -- Letter of Completeness Dear Glenn B Giles The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-08047. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on October O5, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. S chodtler@mycl earwater. com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-08047 - 19400 US HIGHWAY I9 N ~ ~ Sep. 08 2006 03:37PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 919549233838 Sep. 08 03:37PM 00'42 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MBJU' #04. THBd SELECT OFF. BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-8~-HELP-FAX C435-7329). u ~~~ ~~2J~ ~~~ 10-x- ~'~"`~"~ ~- ~ `~ T i Schodtler, John From: Enrique Gomez [enriqueg@arcavenue.com] Page 1 of 2 Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:25 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Thompson, Neil; Wagner, James; brad@hodgenconstruction.com; 'Wood, Jessica'; Glenn Giles; FILE Subject: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER (FLD2006-08047) -YOUR LETTER DATED 9-1-06 John: In regard to your letter dated 9-1-06 (attached) for the above project (your ref. # FLD2006-08047), please note the following responses to your questions: 1. Provide documentation of Unity of Title of the six listed parcels of land. Please see a-mail below from Planning Department Manager, Neil Thompson, indicating that this document does not need to be done prior to application but will be a condition of approval. 2. Provide documentation that the proposed redevelopment of the property is not exceeding 25 percent of the value of only the primary structures on the property, as recorded through the Pinellas County Property Appraiser (727-464-3207) The demolition & remodeling of the showroom area project DOES exceed the 25 percent threshold as described above and that is why the proposed project includes site improvements required by code based on the whole dealership property (6 parcels). ~~ Clarify. The parking data table indicates 429 parking spaces provided for customers based on 163,450 square feet of display area. The site plan only~~hows 98 spaces for customers, where are the other 331 customer parking spaces? See attached parking requirements. For vehicle sales/display the code requires 2.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of lot sales area (163,450 SF) but it does not indicate how to allocate the use. We designated the use of the parking spaces for the benefit of the client. Our total of 429 parking spaces includes the following uses: C- customer, E-employee, D-display and IS-in service. The 42 spaces for office use (OFF) were calculated '~ separately because of the different ratio and are IN ADDITION to the 429 provided. The inventory storage use (STO} is shown as a separate number (404) to designate the bullpen (tandem) parking layout in the back of m~ the dealership and is not part of the code requirement. 4. Clarify the use of the Administration building. Is it administration for the Dealership or another use? The Administration building is for the exclusive use of the dealership. Please let me know if you need additional information or if any other documentation needs to be submitted. I welcome your questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, Enrique Gomez Project Architect i~~o,rt ~~ t ~~: 1i~~i Y341 Hollywood Blvd. ~ Noiiywood, i-L Ph: 954-923-5838 !Fax: 954-923-3838 E-mail: enriqueg@arcavenue.com Mobile phone: 954-562-4268 9/6/2006 • Page 2 of 2 From: neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com [mailto:neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:31 PM To: james.wagner@myclearwater.com; enriqueg@arcavenue.com Subject: RE: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER -QUESTION REGARDING UNITY OF TITLE Yes. All parcels within the scope of the application. It doesn't need to be done prior to application, but will be a condition of approval. Neil Thompson -----Original Message----- From: Wagner, James Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:27 PM To: 'Enrique Gomez' Subject: RE: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER -QUESTION REGARDING UNITY OF TITLE Hello Enrique, I am going to forward this to our Planning Department Manager. They will be able to answer your questions. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Enrique Gomez [mailto:enriqueg@arcavenue.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:52 PM To: Wagner, James Cc: brad@hodgenconstruction.com; Glenn Giles; FILE Subject: 11006 AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER -QUESTION REGARDING UNITY OF TITLE James: This is in regard the above project which was presented to you at the pre-development meeting (BPRC) that took place on 6-21-06 with the attendance of our office Principal, Glenn Giles. I have included a PDF file showing the proposed Site Plan for your reference. We have a question regarding the Flexible Development Application which we are planning to submit next Wednesday, August 30th. Our client, Autonation, does not want to execute a Unity of Title for the 6 parcels that compose the property. Is this document required for the Flexible Development application in this particular project? Your timely response will be greatly appreciated. You may call me at my cell phone (954-562-4268) or office (954-923-5838). Thank you. Sincerely, Enrique Gomez Project Architect 2341 Hollywood Blvd. - Hollywooa, rl Ph: 954-923-5838 /Fax: 954-923-3838 E-mail: enriqueg@arcavenue.com Mobile phone: 954-562=4268 9/6/2006 Clearwater September O1, 2006 Glenn B Giles 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood, Fl 33020 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. COM VIA FAX: 954-923-3838 RE: FLD2006-08047 -- 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Glenn B Giles The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-08047. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide documentation of Unity of Title of the six listed parcels of land. 2. Provide documentation that the proposed redeveloment of the property is not exceeding 25 percent of the value of only the primary structures on the property, as recorded through the Pinellas County Property Appraiser (727-464-3207). 3. Clarify. The parking data table indicates 429 parking spaces provided for customers based on 163,450 square feet of display area. The site plan only shows 98 spaces for customers, where are the other 331 customer parking spaces? 4. Clarify the use of the Administration building. Is it adminstation for the Dealership or another use? Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, September 5, 2006 (4:15pm). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II Letter of Incompleteness - FLD200(-08047 - /9400 US HIGHWAY 19 N • i Sep. 81 2006 03:40PM N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 919549233838 Sep. 01 03:39PM 00'46 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. TFBJ SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'- FOR FAX ADIJAHTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-80th-FOP-FAX 1435-7329). S~-~'~i, ~~w o~ ~ ~_~, . FLD2006-08047 19400 US Highway 19 9/21 /2006 CALL ;~~.~0 ,~~_~~~ ~ ~~~ u~J ~ R. 60 ~ a 1 ~\~ c ~I 1I II ~"•~.• Location Map Owner: Autoway Dodge Case: FLD2006-08047 Sites: 19400 US Highway 19 Property 13.17 Size Acres Atlas Pa e: 3098 PINS: 19-29-16-00000-110-0500 19-29-16-00000-110-0600 19-29-16-00000-110-0610 19-29-16-46388-000-0010 19-29-16-00000-140-0100 19-29-16-92322-001-0071 S:1 Planning Department I L U t~ 1 FLtX (FLU) I Incomplete I us Hwy i v w i vuuUHUroway uoage ~~~ - ~ va i wiap Request Form.doc 1235 6 124 6 124 S 8 g g ~ i 7 O 124 712 Fi 16 1 1246 1 1247 1 12 195ee 8 125921 8 f 54 ~ 125515 2 1255 1 1 ttNS i 9 125 9 126 y 128114 3 1258 W 12592 2.2 A c<A 1 V ~ 10 12658 10 128 ~ 1263 C 126 Q 12833 1 11 V 1 1 18 1271 11 1272 1273 2 5 70 m 1289 11ASt 1 19505 12 17 1277 12 11 6 1276 12754 1 g 1T i28~6 13 1284 10 1285 7 1282 5 1ws19593 1 / 1283 l 1290 12 14 16 N 14 g m x 8 1285 1 '~i ~ N ' 12 19500 ~ 12 BREN7INOOD DR i A s ~ 129 N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N N 1 i ~Z 16 15 14 13 12 10 9 8 7 1 /~ ( 11 ~ wm 7.62 Ac 19400 t O 1IA2 A c~A Zoning Map Cnnrner. Autoway Dodge Case: FLD2006-08047 Sites: 19400 US Highway 19 Property 13.17 Size Acres Atlas Pa e: 3096 PINS: 19-29-16-00000-11 o•OSOo 19-29-1 s-00000-11 o-OSOo ~ s-2s-1 s-00000-110-0610 19.29-16-46388-000-0010 19-29-16-00000-140-0100 19-29-16-92322-001-0071 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Incomplete\US Hwy f 9 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) - JVS\Map Request Form.doc 1235 CG 6 23 6 124 1241 ~ t3 $ 8 ,y 60 ~ ~..5~^O^~ 197 7 O 124 712 i3 16 1 124 1 1247 1 12 18886 8 1253?i 8 1264 W 125515 2 12551 ,,,os 1 ~ 9 T/U 1 O 125 g o ~ 126114 3 1258 12592 2.2 A c(A 1 10 ~ 19 10 126 1285 ~ 1283 126 ~ C 3 1283 1 Q ~ 1 1 11 ~ 12718 11 127 ~ 12732 5 0 , 1288 tt~ost 19505 g~Q 1 ~ m ^ ~ 12 12 12777 12 12791 6 1278 12754 CG 1 13 1288 13 1284 10 1285 7 1282 5 tws18593 12 1280 1283 12 14 15 H 1q g m 8 1285 1 w '~ 5p ~ 19500 P 12 BREN7INOOD DR 1 A s ~ 1z9 N N ~ ~ N ~ y~ ~ N 1 195 12 16 15 14 13 t0 9 8 7 1 12 11 umt ~ T/ V 7.62 A c t9aoo CG 19 4 „~ ACCA Future Land Use Map Owner. Autoway Dodge Case: FLD2006-08047 Sites: 19400 US Highway 1 9 Property 13.17 Size Acres Atlas Pa e: 3096 PINS: 19-29-16-000-1 to-osoo 1 s-2s-1 s-oooo0-110-0~0 1 s-2s-1 s-oooo0-11 o-os10 1 s-2s-1 s-as3as-0oo-0010 19-29-16-00000-140-0100 19-2& 16-92322-001-0071 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Incomplete\US Hwy 19 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) - JVSVv1op Request Form.doc 1235 n 6 1241 1 6 $ $ S 8 ~ ~ ~ 19 ~ E O 12~ T 1 N 16 1 1 1 1247 1 19666 3 ; 1251 6 12555 2 5 1 ,Q ~ W 125 ~~ms 1 e O 125 s 12 Q 1261a 3 1~8 125!!? 2.2 A c to ~ ul ' i 79 10 12 ~ 12s'~ 12 C ~ 1263 1 4. ~ Q Veh icle Malec „ C T~ " 127 V 73 5 ~ , 1269 1 ' m 1 1i06t 19505 1~ 1 ,2 in e,~'a ily es>< a ~ ill 4 1277 12T 1278 1275 1 13 128 13 10 7 1 5 ttI0s19593 1 1285 28 1 1 14 15 N 14 9 d g 12851 60 ~ so n 18500 ~ 12 BREN7Y VOOD D R i a 6 j i H H N N ~ ~ q H p H ,'3 16 15 14 ,3 10 9 8 7 1 195 1 12 11 1 "~' Vehicle Salec 7.62 A c 19400 194 ,.gym Ac~q Vehicle Salec Existing Use Map Owner. Autoway Dodge Case: FLD2006-08047 Sites: 19400 US Highway 19 Property 13.17 Size Acres Atlas Pa e: 3096 PINS: 192916-00000-110-0500 1 &29-16-00000-110-0600 1929-16-00000-110-0610 19-2916-46386-000-0010 192916-00000-140-0100 192916-92322-001-0071 S:\Planning Department\C D B\~LEX (FLDj\lncomplete\US liwy 19 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) - JVS\Map Request Form.doc Y ~ ~ * ~ r f ~ ~ '~ r J ~~r w J 1; J -~ .~ y -~ ~ ~ L Y ~ ~ v ,. T - ~! try , ~ a Ig~,.- r 'r' ~ , ! .o l ~ ~,. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ S 11~~ ~ F t 5 .yJ :J~ O~ ~ > .w ~~° r P ;y If ,~ w 4'~ ~` ,'per' .- '<- -V - _ _~~y ~,~ - L ~ ~~ '~ ~ ..~ ~~ ~ _ . ` , ~J; 3 ~ y •'J f ` ~. r Aerial Map Owner: Autoway Dodge Case: FLD2006-08047 Sites: 19400 US Highway 19 Property 13.17 _ Size(Acres): Atlas Pa e: 3098 PI N S: 1 s-zs-1 s-00000-11 o-osoo 19-2s-1 Cr00000-11 aosoo 1 s-zs-1 s-~ooo-11 o-os10 19-29-16-46388-000-0010 19-zs-16-00000-lao-0100 19-29-16-92322-001-0071 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDJ\Incomplete\US Hwy 19 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) - JVSVvtap RequestForm.doc FLD2006-08047 19400 US Highway 19 9/21/2006 Subject Propert} . «'t:~l hour,,gt :,loug ?'S H«1 l :~ `_ '~ R .. ~ ~. ~.:, *~`.. -_ '~ Subject Propert}~. FrterGmilu,~; s,~s auJ lack of l,trm,ett, laud,capw~ s~ ate{ ~' ~: w~""~~'"= ,:. ~ wiiR - - - '=: ` Subject Propert~~. Frooctaudu,lt s,ta, and lack of ptrunritr laud.~u:apwg Subject Propem . ~°`~ fi~rrat;wdme sr~r and lack of lxrmtrir~ l:wd+caE~ur_ .s I ~ ' y~ " ~~~~r ~., ,. a. Subject Propem-. \Frat tiordagr aloug?TS Hn}~ l9 Subject Propem-. 3rd tirrstaudm~ agar ?i ~~ ;;,~ is~,,~, ;: ~ ;~ ; ~~` : `~~` Subject Propem-. \~'rst lnurh rr alorrg?T.S Hn}~ 19 2 ~~ ~' .~ ,-^ , ~_~ <.~~ . ~, P(1~ Subject Propert} . l\'r31 G outogr along ? TS Htc}' 19 Subject Propert}. R'r31 tioutagr alou_?7S Htcc 19 Subject Propert}. \\'e3t tiontagr aloltg?TS H\CC 19 i I ~ ` US High~~ a~~ 19 North. Tlur t au .,.~Itdl lxxuxi I:xlr3 of iltr matol :utrl ctl roain:n 111oR'll a3 ?TS Hlg6R'ac 1 3 ~~ ,, ; y -: =! ~: tom, -- ,., t~ ~~~', ~ Subject Propert} . .-u~ rvstwt t~ehtrlr dt~plnt~ ;u ea iyt T.TS19. a tierstvtdmg s~N~ :md lack of tnquurd urra Subject Propert}~. .~ttxltril Autotca~~ Su7t i ., . ~~~!~ ° ! _ ~ ~ ~~~: ~- - - - - __ Subject Propert}~. .~tt ezLitw~ cduclr JLaplat-:ura ~t T. ;519, a fieeatmaimg atsu vtil larl of requurd trrrs Subject Propert}'. Ftottt lxiildtug Gigadr of Tntck Sdra buildup 4 .- • - ~ . ~. °" + M. Subject Propert~~. .~1u zutm;~ wtznuil czluclr d~,pla}~ area. Subject Propert}~. Frout laiilduu. Ya{aJz of 2\Iaw tialza hu~dutg. Subject Properh . Subject Propem. .~~ zxmtmg wfenk~l czWclz d~pla} vra ~ ` 4~. , 4 °, Subject Propem . Easirln most }r mt of the soiAL }xo}xli} Jule T6r urlgillx,ruy:. }xo}xIh' Ls aLYO \'rkucle Sales ./. _~ ~~ ~_ ` ._.. -~ Subject Propert} . East }~lo},ilh lme TLC 1121~'lllh Lll1K }llo},eli\' LY aLYO \ CIu~12 tiller. ~ ""_y r,>~ ~~-~-.~- ~:,. Subject Property. East pu,p2Lt} line The uelyJllx,lmg pnyxlt~ Is aLY.~ \"rllu;lr Salr+. Subject Propert}~. Easl propiltc Ime T112llil}'}ll,olLLl}t pn,pelh~ LY also \-rlix:li .5.'1}23. 6 -.-- _ t! 4 .. '~~ Subject Property . lFestem moat lwurt of the ix rtlr prolxih~ laic Subject Property . NortL pt yxrt~ lux adtxrttl to Burgle famd~' rrstdeutu~l. :_ ,: : ~. ~• _ .. Subject Propert}. Notth \\~ratrm comer adtacrtil fo suuar kmulc rrudent~al. Subject Propert} . No~ilr pn~xrt~~ Luc ad~aceut to ,ruYJe ti~uul}- retuleutuil. 8 Subject Property. NotiL pr ~~rtt~ liar ndlacrut to xu~Je Luuil\ rraidrul4il. ,~~ -~''~ .~.,~,z~ Subject Property \\'eatrm mo,t aen ~cr hnil~ has Subject Properly. Northn r,t pn~prth lair altacrut to suv;lr tiruiil}' rr,tdrnt4~1. -~ .,.. - r: -, .f ~. ~ ~r~ : ;;~.:: Subject Property . Lot hrt~crru the sric~cr huildmss 9 e q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fi , ~ ~ -.. ~'~ Subject Propert}~. Tnicl: Salrs Buddu~; - .~ri to lx drmol~vhrd. ~riY• s Subject Propert} . Evt prope,tc lufr ,~rludr J~iplm- along t.rS Hrglm'ac I:) R.q k ~rt~ `".~~!! x'~ri~ ~ , ; t ~ ~ - -v~ Subject Propert}'. R'rst p~opr~tt' lair :riiarrut to au~ele 4uuilc rr.,~drutuil. ~ rrryry; `~iT"..9 ~ fly.. ~`r "" ~ _. _- Subject Propert}~. ~~rluclr d~,plac south of tLr .a~huuustratnxf lxf~Jmg. ~~ _.~,~. .~ ~ ~ ~~'' ~~ -'- »s _ ~~ A Subject Propert~~. \\~rst pmprrt~~ Iwr ad~acrut to suielr tiuuitc irudruhal. I r ~r - ~ i~ ~~! i ..~' f~ Subject Property . Ihwtpsiri rudo,urc hrlwwi .aduwustr.,tiou Middurv~. Subject Propert}~. R'rst pn,l,r~h~ Iwr :ni~acrut to ,u>glr tSuul}~ re.,tdrutcil. Subject Property . Nt,ttL r:tst pioprit~ lux adiace~f to T.T51I~i„ ~~ 19. 11 1 ~ _ i I. ' -" ^~~ .d ... ° . - ~ ~s~ ..~~ Adjacent Property to the South. EN~~~R OMC I i ~~ i ~'~" ~w~ x,,, ~ Adjacent Property to the South. ~ 2~ll~~2 $;1~2.i Adjacent Propert} to the South. 12 .1 f ~' r orr,,.. ~ j ~ ~_~+~ ~r ., r ~ 1 .. 4~w ~,,.._.,,.,~a yir w .. `, f ~~f; LONG RANGE PI.FuNNING DEVEI.OFMENT REVIEW November 21, 2006 Mr. Glenn B. Giles Arc Avenue, Inc 2341 Hollywood Blvd Hollywood, 33020 • • ~ITY ®F ~I.EARWA'TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT OFFICr Box 4748, CLEARWA•PF,R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MIINICIPAI. SI;RVICIi$ BUII.nING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUIi, CI.FARWA"I'IiR, FLORInA 33756 T81.GPHONfi (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order -Case FLD2006-08047 - 19400 U.S. Highway 19 North Dear Ms. Giles: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On November 21, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to redevelop an existing Vehicle Sales establishment, in the Commercial District, with an increase to the maximum building height of an attached entrance feature from 25 feet to 36.5 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. Also included is a reduction to front (north) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (south) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Section 3-1202. G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Factof Fact: 1. That the 13.17-acre subject property is located on the west side of the major arterial, US Highway 19 North approximately 150 feet north of Harn Boulevard; 2. That the property is located within the Commercial (C) District and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and Commercial General (CG) and Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan categories; 3. That the proposed redevelopment exceeds 25 percent of the value of the buildings on the property and therefore parking and landscaping on-site must be improve to meet code; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the sun-ounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-701 and 2- 704 of the Community Development Code; Ptt,v~h Ilusitnrtu, Mnvc~rt Jcntn l~cntnn, Cc~t~r.c:n.,~nt•wsr;rt I Ictrr I l:~~ui:ro~. Ccm~~cn.>nt>u+rr 13ti.t.Jo~sUn, Ccx;n<aL.~nnusr;t ® CnRi.it~~ A. 1'rrertsr:n, Ccx ~cn..wt>uirrt "1?c~unl, I?n-t i>i.ot'~~II:~ r non Ar•rntnln nvt•: Ac: rt<Ix li~u~i.cn rat" November 21, 2006 • • FLD2006-08047 Page 2 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-704.C and 2- 704.S of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Anuroval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, all plan sheets are revised to show the canopies of all trees to remain; 2. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a revised landscape plan including a plant schedule/table be submitted; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a recorded declaration of Unity of Title for the six parcels of land is submitted to the Planning Department; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the sight visibility triangle restriction note regarding acceptable vertical height criteria for objects located in the sight visibility triangles shall be revised to state: To minimize traffic hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structure or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within the sight distance triangle; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance; 6. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 7. That the exterior building renovations need to be coordinated to create architectural uniformity (i.e.: painted and trimmed in similar colors) with the other buildings on the property; 8. That the proposed light fixtures are located so that objects or land which are located beyond the boundaries of the parcel of land are not illuminated to an extent of producing more than a diffuse shadow; 9. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 10. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 11. That all existing and any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 21, 2007); and 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (November 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicntionslUSHwy 19 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) Approved IFLD2006-08047 Development Order. doc November 21, 2006 • • FLD2006-08047 Page 3 ~~ additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on December 5, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. Sincerely, --~ ' r~--- / Mic elk, Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished Applications) US Hwy 19 N 19400 Autoway Dodge (C) ApprovedlFLD2006-08047 Development Order.doc ' ~ Inc. • GGB Engrnee g, 3109 Stirling Road, Suite 201 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312 Ph: (954) 986-9899 • Fax (954) 986-6655 email:ggbeng@ bellsouth.net AUTOWAY DODGE CLEARWATER 19400 US Highway 19 North CLEARWATER, FLORIDA STORlO~WATER NARRATIVE August 30, 2006 ORIGINAL RECENED AUG 24 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The existing 13.17 Acre Autoway Dodge site will be augmented and enhanced by the conversion of 27,902 square feet of impervious paved surface to pervious green and landscaped surface. Approximately, 3,809 of existing pervious surface will be converted to impervious paved surface, realizing a gain of 24,093 squaze feet of pervious landscaped surfaces for the total site. The existing site which is building and pavement intensive is being relaxed with the addition of raised landscaped islands and green areas to soften up the massive impervious areas that now the exist. The existing pavement azeas will be repaired and resurfaced as required so that overland runoff is directed to the internal drainage network, which will remain. Where pavement low points exist without sufficient collection basins, additional catch basins and interconnected 15" HDPE piping aze being added which discharge to an enhanced landscaped retention azea. Due to the reduction of a net 24,093 square feet of impervious pavement area to pervious landscaped areas, the project rainfall runoff percentages will be decreased, the ground storage will increase and the resultant storm water flood stages will be reduced. Therefore, the storm water system as exists, and as augmented, will be receiving a reduced amount of runoff and will thus be more efficient and operational. Augmentation of the existing drainage collection system will include, curbing around existing inlets to assure the continuity of the existing grading network, the addition of inlets at existing pavement low points subject to flooding, as well as the addition of an enhanced retention and landscaped area to accept dischazge from the added catch basins. A storm water pollution prevention plan will also be put into place during pavement removal and excavation operations. ~~' ~~~f ~~... The existing drainage system, as augmented and improved, will continue to function as Cr, . • • • •' • • •... originally designed and installed with a reduced amount of runoffcontributing to the `~: `'~ ~~g~ ~'`~ .~ system due to the conversion of existing pavement areas to landscaped and green azea~ : ~ .~fl ~Z ~ ~ ~~ J e~ I CIVIL AND FORENSIC ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS f y~, l 1' _~". .-- ._. .. ~. ... ..-~- -___... _--__._._... o. ..__.~----- .. ~~ - _i t ,_~~..~ a ~ ' - ' -; EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3132" = 1'- 0" .0..~ oin a r~na~E no 0 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/32" = 1'- 0" Y /~~. 41CNI1~Of H6N BUIIU (OM PIIAUEIl11Y pAM A6EMENi n S O Z ~ ~ ~v ~ m ~ °~ ~ m Z --1 ~~ ~ - p0 Autoway Dodge v~ WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3/32" = 1'- 0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/32" = 1'- 0" ~ x~t~ ~- ARC AVENUE ARCMI1fEfU RE DESIGN BUILD CUN FUiER AIUEU EAC IIIIY MAXA6EM ENT ~~~. _i~~l ? A n 5 Z ~ Z C ~~ c~ m~ my E~ ~ m ~ ~~ ~ v~ '~ m _ o~ Z --1 B IN B B ~~~ e e n~ ~ e ~~~~ e e ai Autoway Dodge