Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2006-04022
Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ' 2,M O- * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER _AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section S?ection 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ! T OPH 16 f: M IIQ/ #PZ_rWytSRh0 C/ /Tu,.Y ? &?(AU _) Uf, NC- / MAILING ADDRESS: CaArt 'T &f--r 331 S - 42 PHONE NUMBER: 443 - 6 7/ 9 F NUMBER: -72') '7 23(29 PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: (22,-7) 443.- 0-7(g FAX NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: 16 if4LP1V ffOPY16 W C961 1Y& C61464 ) `14W7 ow. B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NAME: ??30 STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): 1/ 2 PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SAC PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) SAPlanning ylA/ c,?, ? \ SU .?O CASE #: fib RECEIVED BY (staff initials):. DATE RECEIVED: --q/, RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLAWNC?ICs DEPARTMENT C11Y OF CLEARWAM n 4-202.A) PROJECT VALUATION: PARCEL SIZE (square feet): $ ,g/)_ 0nclCi AW 70 US CJ<619AA. O F 8u in( 45 ?=Sr o i= IZFTi i 4 oFF 6C 4 t!o 966 WARAAC --3izo .S /45 S7- - P/doR9sC-? T ScaF?°ch?l?f oN's/T? /??2?i?d?S. ?r?FC2 ?vU ?1l-116IC-,-? 6tcr-S A- /eE-( i.lE?3'lC 1-wNis vfe A/o12Wapartment\Application orms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive In?fill/Project (FED) 2006.doc / GA ST 6 p swTq age 1 f8 u f es . t f ?? / I T L SIr? &i/C.(_ ?8 J / M. /0/ZLVC-U le& fa S? /?'-? W hT?2 QUAL,1 T/ 'T?eCy1rW--W r; ACCCSS A-NO L4-tiD SC.FMInfg. I DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO. (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLIC , EED THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) SCC It/k-C ka> 1a, D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section, 3-913.A) 0 Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Tc- 1'/toP0Sl9> RETA1? Lt c?ig- A. 4 CA2aue-S7 Wo S S7WOC- A )q 6 5Fiit5D"6®p ©r AD VA-CE-47- Re-rAt(-,A-rrb A C?2 I /1 t00 ,(!CW7;t? , /two AuTo t h2TS S u5c6s y SimtL41L 1/4 kftC l /ATI&IKITY. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. T4C &of'oSC 9C--1;4f(- USE 143/(L /M/XoLk-- la-JE tft & Y IWD AXW& "l 1?LN & do U IU- LrJ A/D AJ 4Z 910(66;2 yi2- 0 /SCoLcr?-1KC DEVftcn6-AN (157 AP9MG-AiT- CADo t0CAL PA&gq 11114-uES ShOULD 06? WIII lam,. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. T?fC 1 PD?'C? USE WILL I M194VC LOCM sllJ?? AdO DA A'f1M/? L ?? tflC?OC-?T2/ATO 14-000-S? l f?ic.l7y >n? Tftc?.?4? ?li? .40?in?6 oAt.?? CN 1 4fic? of /r?/ 6 -1 t(CZN, 4. The proposed development is designe to minimize traffic congestion. 'D C4"'6ri to i M ff2,6 ACCC-S A-PJ - I c 0-12Cq cA7r&4 'T© AOu('-'E C Ca-X 6?&Va 1!'--02 -IMF IOIW6S50 S i"T1-C6!fJ7 u CC& 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. - fC bfU6L0(-M& T AWoSCS Di2?TiC uft6fQC-S -rO Soffit w"6e, ACCeSS 0S1 'aE C-S to PAr-k 164 AWO LArIO WIAk-)- /A/ -rffC- 13126:er1(J o r 0- 1-rY (? oALS Fi32 "r* C- CfM2AC?tl-yz 4 4C-SAf&7t-CS oil 6L,LF=-To- 13A- 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. `?rfE C(rS7r1,,,3r4 ('wo SuIL 3 WC) I S V,464&,r 9 6U C?}{TC? ? T1?? R? U Sr-- w(c.c_ 11A0t r..)6- A2CIOIFe44ft , L)i Sg4L, , A-t-,fb L-,1 57C4 I Mp/1 AJ64 LC-PM -To 1Q- IV M CIfE -T E 0?-a ?'S/ ItAl 1 eeyw(z®- --fqG ft PlE-1Y I OS At964.by &CA CoCAgA9D OF /4U M &-/ S 81281,C60 C>CCuN --rRc exuLD1 6. RECEIVED 901anning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc 1 b" - Page 2 of 8 APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARttMeM C11Y OF CLEARWATIM • • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: use, intensity, other development standards. '-r+gE c-)c tSrf, G 9 SI= &A I L-o t,Jg w,*3 ca^rs?euctC-r-) ?,J corft 62 "64 cum LD C CK t-0661 I/4 D 1 D 6O7 624 M -rkE r4kS&P REr?EcjECOPIM AS C0 MP/n!i5lC 40 KO bfC-VIA-T-(O •(; 1: oIM (`:W/12C,W'' 9s ?I S WILL ecOSC-LY k'aC? 66!5' ? ''(`f L-0 Ui4t&WE 19RZICT- I. C Af? 06 WINA ) 86 / err , ti i t id l i fill l h i fill d l t t ill r n eve opmen projec or res en a n projec opment as a compre ens ve re w not 2. The development of the parcel p oposed for deve reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) $ U"T"t' lA glg&M Lu? ? -r?C ' ro Wf (CA RC-- PH&L A460 OCCURS. RZa"?? @AWV AMMER VAS U6 Is 6ZI p Sm Arm SAIcsuIL-0 14 QNSE i is eril -rW 640950 P/??I? IrKM 4 06'n 6\PrS 3. The uses within the comprehensive infll redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. "t " Z11,i1 FJ(a A-u 61 1 S IW A l u A St?C- u _<Z?S 'Sim I LA-9 . 6ZSC _ LO (kC--2c- 1 t'll, I_KE G V . 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. --t''_ k)l 1C I S A4 ro MIS' _9&Z- Vt s tot LL- 66 0= l ffl!. 6L -C- W I-tF-E' AD T OerA"f L , Auto- MO- Aje. CA(L ?aC-r?7frc? /fi n CA2 Kem 2 use IA 7wF AfC-f 6" 4actwco o . 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. E ()2,pZC-cT P"oS6-?; I M AV&D St ??9(?k,n(C , 1J 0 ?t?? o?-S ,SC-, /JET} S I /?E ?3 aim uJ4-r62 M1fW4QCM IAyDSCR 94Q , Cfc, I0.SN IC}{ WILA ?E ?MMildU l S To VF 66140WAND, 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. '"CIS OZ-SC-C-17 wILL- I°llWaX ft?y 1rKX6UfaK6J7_S WHICH +tE r,\J Ti(C- 7 of -TO- E G LDC I-Wo 1 o fFL W e ?Ff F GAALf - - -o -e-ay eoiml 0 afz > 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. t MAyY of T??C- C21?21 ? LDC r ` ' ye b - - a n( S r i 0x % r3 i L r N Ft2t??M T war rat, 4W A4 C-x1S7/1J(; eu1Lp1^K T OC(LVY A VIJV 1e 8u91Ae-!S J , W?f IL 8,e-1,JC)1fX-, A 115SafiiC rM?*(tY4Cs 'rO 77? ? 1'57 O ? Ut - / N parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid -stparicing in the immediate vicinity according to the shared 3. Adegt7atff on-street parkin in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. MZIECT 62 90SK (30-N - c _ 10A&K 1 nSC? ?uRKou?? I?? ~??F I?A?-L . ?? /,}CSC= -?_P?S Gum fiUoi _oE cy2&S 4YAtO e9W?_9_166 GcJC R(5VU CE G O/Z tOaJ 1/llG, e4d(a6SZ16 . RECENED SAPlanning DepartmenhApplication Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 3 of 8 APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARINM CITY OF CLEARWAM E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) (56e S46e-r d C(--- RAf,3S ) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one of the following): Storrnwater plan as noted above is included) 47- tormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) k SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; (tuo -ragn cI S 1 ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and ?J condition of such trees;. C,r"Sa -T?2r,5 0rA SI'7rTC--) y?1 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; C S C_,C fLA_f?S-? ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 SAPlanning DepartmenMpplication Forms\development revievA2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 4 of 8 PLANNING DEPARNM CRY OF CLEARWAM G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) X SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ?/ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; %/ All dimensions; r,// Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; IJA Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; r? All required setbacks; I/ All existing and proposed points of access; ? All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; ? Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; V, All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _? Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); ? Location of all landscape material; 0 oJA- ?? Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; V Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _? Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: )EXISTING REQUIRED Land area in square feet and acres; 4/,qp / 7 7 /? _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; -Yn _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; ?/ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the /??'-' N(.?J NO number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Zy o # ) _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 '/z X 11); (A1-(-A1GK 60) FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: CSrr6 (s One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; PROPO ED 402710-901 0A1 0.94P( ACgp4) RECEIVED SAPlanning DepartmentWpplication Forms\development revievA2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLO) 2006.doc Page 5 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMEM CITY OF CLEAMNAM H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ` LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): V All existing and proposed structures; i// Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; -I' Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; .,/ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required t/ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; / Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all d existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; L Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ?L Irrigation notes. ` REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); (A-MAC 96D t6g COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. R'CEIVED SAPlanning DepartmenAApplication Forms\development reviewt2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc APR 2 7 2006 Page 6 of 8 PLANNING DEPARIM Clio OF CLEARWAIIR K.. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Ll Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ¦ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. El Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movepdnt at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required..g-, - 4=110?ThsTUDY - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. O Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. ire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CA TION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CAL ULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. of pro(Jbrty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELjI AS- Sworn ndst bsc 'bed before me this ?fa day of d A.D. 20C?? to me and/or by who is personally known has as commission Wllr ' Commission #DD258944 tsonded Thru Atlantic Bondin I?? SAPlanning DepartmentWpplicalion FormsWevelopment review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project,1 - -------- f'' gµ•y^?O E I`?J v ED Page 7 of 8 APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARWW !`ITY OF CLEARWAIM N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (IY6 1 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names APPS I C A&C ; AL-5A 15 Leh-t-c-°D u? at> IS, C-,NS 'tea I?a?iIE r-rp??IL? RA4 ki 14 1 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doestdo) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this personally appeared Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. day of who having been first duly sworn Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 S1Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 8 of 8 pLANNING DEPPR1 8 Cm OF CLEARWArER a 0 on/ud/duub 1,a: Gef WMN UULLS I t 1 N rUN I UU I I L 1 t13 -7 rL r *i11 r :J0:7 rvu. =„I7 trU-) rta -Ij U e Ubi U:?I:'Uba Filba Consulting Corp. (727)4.4-7-2369 p.2 ORIGINAL RECEII/M N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT. 1 • Proviao'names of ')if property owners on tlecd - MINT lull names: Alan A. Rophie -Ralph -A,_. Rophie Cecilia gatee, ^? V PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARW,aTER .Cheryl R. Cohen '. That (I amlwo era) tilc owner(S)and rOG"Xi tiflo holder(s) of the foilowir,y descrfbod property (address or general location); _2430 Gult-To-BSV Boulevard, Clea..rwtarer, Florida _ ?. Teal this property inn ;utuias the Property far which a request for. a, {desctioe reauesf) _Apl?lication_? FLD_ 200604022„^ 4. T!lat the unyorsignad (has!h. vc) appointee and (daesldo) appolm: ,- - y Alba Consulting Corp./John Atartario ,s (t,iutitretr) ayrnt(s) to execute:- any petitions mother dor:uments neertcaary to after such petition ? _ - a• That this affidavit han no.Pn executed to induce the City of Clearwater, r-Iorida to cons)aer and act on the above dereAtled property: G. That:itc 0si15 to the orepCrty are necessary by City roprosenratlvus in at-doe to pror'•oss mis apolicatim, and tho owner ltrtnoriztls City rnprt,sontati?es to vieir ario prtolor)mph the propo,ry derc4bea in 11118 appticatiorh; 7. That (fnve), the UndArsipnod authority, hereby cc,tify teat Ilia torfigoing 1; true aria coo-rea wpurty Cywr,, r - Prudery owr,'& Property Owner _ ?_ Propoay?Owncr -... ' ."- STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 30fore me the undcrrsigned, all offrecr duly commissioned by MM laws of the State of Florida, on this 2nd ----?_? __ c'y of May 2006 p,;50n,90Yappeared Cheryl R. Cohen who having been first rattly sworn Br)poses and says th;tl hdsho fully understands the Contents of the affidavit that hasne slgnod. L. '4 Kea, Not ty Public 111yy,?, HOr?z4?ii ~- NuI„y SnaUSlcmp My Commission Fxplros; ?` PVT` GEORGIA SEPT 28.2=1 .. ?, •, C'RL.1Loo, CN Cpv Y.,lfiiP•,i,i7 ?fa4;ntaYJ,P;,rr,OUVa Fa'i n0lpevCb(kAefµ m?•:orr2GOl) FP'IMtC4m,Yppd?ilW Iniul rn)IBCI tFLl7) "pOG.dco Page 8 of 8 -V .-r " -V, V -p-Y vco?yn l OJ VVIOLca I L 1 -1 U U"t U I I P. I Planning and.Developmeni Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Ctea water, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-682-4567 Fax 727-5824576 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED APPLICATION ? SUB WT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including folded site plan M. DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAM] USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: 1 SOUTH: 1 WMT• ! EAST' I COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revises 4!19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION.- (Code Section 41001) C/o JW N AT,4,4,4v o APPUCANTNAME: ?RorNtE 'FAA IL-I -TWtxs-r 14 ALSA CW-1rU ..-r1.0j Coi2F%12AT-(o,S MAKING ADDRESS: ( 4 bc? C o u t2 T S We-r , C L 6At1W A-rC-& 0 ?L 33756 PHONE NUMBER: (-n-7) 4 43 - o-7I S FAX NUMBER: - ('727) qq ( ' z3 (P? A c Q,,Q? PROPERTY OWNER(S): C .SAME AS (, , r -1 CA-Arl / (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) Swr-r U WdbL N C 1 b LA C .I J IL MAILING ADDRESS: l 4 6 C bkx(&r ST. (!QA2wAf&t , FL 737940 1 (I y -7 --f.-'- Q PHONE NUMBER: 4 T G - C7 Opp Y, ?3FAX NUMBER: ( Z 77) Y / D ';A The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, N the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which saUisfias the hollowing criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionstelevations, renderings and pempectlves may be necessary as supplemenfhryf information In addition to the Information provided on this worksheet: RECEIVED Architectural Theme. APR 2 7 2006 a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shelf be designed as a part of the f&I sMPAR theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the developrAMt? The Landscape is in concert with the local development maximizing Landscape treatment and enhancing architectural themes- sP0CI?$Cakl%A ?or +%-,e %sktn4k 9 Iowa SE bu %16%nat on Artie cea r oS -the a?ce?. The?c re -t e R uearn is re aeskt r a ver%so ee va tiemeelAk seObae s air d 15'A 16' bU Aers MAu Ire A P-6 -?h e C,? l? - 4 0 -?,a1?t d ?" d K 1 per /? etnye krdn ?--ages as Page 1 of 3 1`Qk%A-ed A-ft -HAe ey.*%S 'Irn EmJcerrrtse -?ReA-A- Car- ?u? 4,o Legak\? 6thain5 Iease ?otns}ro,?n?s. yep 1'+ vo v'+:vrp %,opiey uesign rassoaaies r?r-roo-4? i r p.z b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The Landscape treatment has been maximized on the property T without jeopardizing drainage patterns, underground or overhead utilities, and the function of the building. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Lighting will be controlled to be respectful of neighbor ng properties. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Landscape treatment is designed to give years of benefits without the disruption of building function, drainage and utilities. Scott Lincoln, PE President L Lincoln Associates Civil Engineering Group, Inc. 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 E-Mail: siincoln@LACivil.com Psye 2 of 3 RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '->VP 1-+ vv vt.v I P vvNicy vcaiy11 r1JZ>UL4 aico 141 -r v:r•ty I I lr..j . , c 0 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have beneficipact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinitgof the parcel proposed for development. The Landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically leasing views while providing climate control for building and parking areas. 5. special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Please return checklist for review and verification. 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is tru Graz . rty ow Pr rty owner STATE OF FLORIDA., COUNTY of PIi ELLAS Before me the undersigned. an otricer duly commissioned by the laws of the state of Florida. on this personally appeared S / Deposes and says that hefshe fully understands the contends of the affidavit that fiats My Commission Expires: s: application formsldevelopment reviewfcomprehensive Idndscape program application-doe Page 3 of 3 day of been first OUlY sworn Notary Public P& Vk Michael B. Steeves Commission #DD258944 .,? Expires: Oct 17, 2007 Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. RECEIVED APR 2'7 2966 pIAN"MG DeARIMEM -1 EARWAiER CITY OF CLEARWATER a' PLANNING DEPARTMENT 99KATEf;;'?POST ONCE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 Alba Consulting Corp., Inc. Mr. John Atanasio 1420 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Lk/VV/L LINCOLN ALLEN CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 1446 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 RECEIVED APR 2'7 2006 PLANNM DEPARWMEM CRY OF CLEARWATER Ph (727) 446-9000 / Fax (727) 446-9050 PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed project will be a revitalization of an existing 9,000 SF building on the subject property located at 2430 Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard (SR 60), Clearwater, Florida. The building uses will be split via an existing demising wall with 6,000 SF of Retail/Office use (Car Quest) and 3,000 SF of Storage use. Planning Staff has indicated that this project will only be considered by application under the Comprehensive Infill category since the project will require various deviations via flexibility from the City of Clearwater Land Development Code criteria. The property is presently occupied by a 9,000 SF concrete block building with adjacent parking and similar neighboring uses. The building was originally constructed by American Motros Corporation and utilized for Vehicle Service and Repair activities. The building was later used by Lokey Motor Company as a Body Shop and Auto Repair facility. The present owner is the Rophie Family Partnership, c/o ALBA Consulting Corporation (ALBA). ALBA is assisting the owners as the Agent to process a Flexible Development Application for this Comprehensive Infill Project, to gain approval from the City of Clearwater to lease the 9,000 SF building to a prospective tenant, Car Quest. Car Quest plans to occupy 6,000 SF of the building as an auto parts retail store. The remaining 3,000 SF will be retained by the owner as storage. LA Civil interviewed Mr. Craig Flournoy, Stores Operations Manager for Car Quest (352-274-8348) to gain some insight to the business operation. According to Mr. Flournoy, Car Quest Auto Parts operates between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM daily. Car Quest sells products to the general public similar to other retail auto parts stores like Discount Auto Parts and Advance Auto Parts, which only amounts to 15% of their total sales. The main part (85%) of their business is sales and delivery of auto parts to installers such as GoodYear, Tires Plus, and similar local car care centers. Hence, parking demand for the general public appears to peak between 3 and 5 parking spaces. Therefore, since the proposed Plan will provide 16 onsite parking spaces and 14 on-street spaces, although less than the retail parking requirement of 36 spaces, we think parking capacity will be far greater than the parking demand. Information about car Quest can be researched at http://www.carguest.com/about.htm. Car Quest is expected to be a lower intensity use than the historical uses in the building, like the former Lokey Motor Body Shop operation. In addition, the adjacent uses to the south, east and west are Enterprise Rent-A- Car, Advance Auto Parts & Memeke Car Care, and "A to Z" Auto Care, respectively. Car Quest will be a compatible use in the neighborhood and will As part of this application, the owners have proposed to improve driveway access to the property and parking which will prevent congestion on the roadway and will improve internal circulation. The driveway & parking improvements will cause "A to Z" Auto Care to remove approximately (15) junk vehicles from the subject property. In coordination, the parking area proposed will be resurfaced and landscaping will be provided to buffer the property from the single family residential properties on the north side of Shelley Street. In addition, the owner is proposing a stormwater quality treatment swale to capture the first one-half inch of runoff from the repaved parking area. The owner is also proposing a 5' sidewalk with ADA ramps along Kilmer Avenue and Shelley Street, along with 14 on-street parking spaces and integrated landscaping/street trees with the proposed project buffering. 0 0 As part of this application, the owner is requesting approval of the following conditions & LDC deviations: 1. The property will be approved for Retail/Office/Storage Uses in the C Zoning District based on site planned deviations from the Commercial General Standards (Code Section 2-701 and 2-702) for FAR, ISR, Lot Area, Lot Width, Maximum Height, Setbacks and Buffers. The total proposed GFA for the project will be 9,000 SF which will require (36) parking stalls based on 4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA. However, since only (16) stalls are being proposed onsite and (14) stalls are being proposed as onstreet parking, LA Civil and the Applicant have studied the Car Quest operation and concluded further herein that the parking demand will be as low as 5 to 5 vehicles at any time during the day. 2. Improvements to the subject property, as requested by the City Staff in conjunction with this application, shall be limited to the portion of the Lot occupied by the 9,000 SF building and the east property line of the Enterprise Rent-A-Car site. Staff has therefore required that the applicant request approval of a 5-foot setback for the existing pavement along the Enterprise Rent-A-Car frontage along Kilmer Avenue and 0-foot (Zero Foot) setback to pavement along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. The required setback according to Staff is 15 feet and will mandate 10-foot and 15-foot variances, respectively. The applicant is also thereby requesting approval of a 0-foot (Zero Foot) buffer rather than the required 15- foot landscape buffer along the Enterprise Rent-A-Car frontage along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd and a 5-foot buffer rather than the required 15-foot landscape buffer along the Enterprise Rent-A-Car frontage along Kilmer Avenue. 3. The rear buffer along Shelley Street, abutting the parking, will be allowed to be no less than 9.94' in width except as already exists abutting the dumpster enclosure. 4. The rear buffer along Shelley Street, abutting the parking, will be allowed to be utilized for the proposed 4:1 stormwater treatment Swale. 5. (1) 30 SF Tenant Wall Signs will be allowed on south building face as shown on Sheets 3 & 5 of the Plans. 6. The total proposed GFA for the project will be 9,000 SF with 16 onsite parking stalls rather than 36. PARKING ANALYSIS: LA Civil interviewed Mr. Craig Flournoy, Stores Operations Manager for Car Quest (352-274-8348) to gain some insight to the business operation. According to Mr. Flournoy, Car Quest Auto Parts operates between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM daily. Car Quest sells products to the general public similar to other retail auto parts stores like Discount Auto Parts and Advance Auto Parts, which only amounts to 15% of their total sales. The main part (85%) of their business is sales and delivery of auto parts to installers such as GoodYear, Tires Plus, and similar local car care centers. Hence, parking demand for the general public appears to peak between 3 and 5 parking spaces. Therefore, since the proposed Plan will provide 16 onsite parking spaces and 14 on-street spaces, although less than the retail parking requirement of 36 spaces, we think parking capacity will be far greater than the parking demand. RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PtANMNG DEPARIMEW COY OF CLEARWAI'ER 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EASTERN 150 FEET (CONTAINING 41,997 SF MOL) OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS PER O.R. 8632, PG. 326: FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN S 89°40'55" E ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 324.57 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE FOR KILMER AVE, THENCE N 1°01'28" E, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF KILMER AVENUE, 330.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION AS RECORDED IN THE PLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 55 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N 89°41' 18" W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION, 324.50 FEET, THENCE S 1-02'13" W, 330.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING LESS THE SOUTH 50.00 FEET AND THE EAST 30.00 FEET FOR THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER •? ,cr _ _ : ; ... - - ' . ` I-its? 0 134- • 1 ? .7,(!,T1 "- APR r4, 1994. 5:0$PH ' ,1t/1MC0 FORM e ' PITiELLA? COUNTY. FLA: r _ 863E ' PG. 326• ?,,?? . • ,??a, n aFE : REC : BK )IIR ?N1?-s41iiAi DCP- E"cvted this 12 dal of 7'1 - A. D. 19 94' . by i `? P-17. So AIM RBPID'S ? RALBIi • . - •• - ._ ;? AOPHlB, .C2.7CILrR Bt:IE(3i and 09ML ' 03fBH, equally, poal- office tiddreu is t~yJl'WRET J. 07H1N, tapi •r C/o 1ie88ett,' (Y,i}>en,• C Beitt3marsi _, - 6 AK torneys at -Law, One Iekeside ozuc is , second lent: • 900_FlWVWrd-• Drive, adte 990, ?-_ _ r- - - r AtIalitlll r Geoi4ia 30328 - - ' itt'krewr eat hen:. tM tens. ' .:r•M°t rIT a .d ••?es? . 1 ,mr'• larh .4 ,ir and r„a.M ,i..l' Mi nn, lyd t- - - rew?•s.Wt.r•...e .tar ./ I.i.Y," e./ w rru.r, W arp, M any+wx +L.re.+r w e..tw - That the Bald Jim patio.; and Fn conaidpalton of the sum off ` i " in Aland 'pea by dw gala second tasty. the receipt whereopis 6ra6y acbssosYltdged, doe, Itin47 rrnitae, ie- _ ?1 - lease and quil-e(ala unto t6 said second Party forever, all'the-dirk, tire, inlerest,elaiint assddimand which the said fhs$ Party has in and io A. foflowtng described lot. Place or parcel of land, s6unid, lying and being a in Ilse County -of . Pinellas _ Slate of Florida . to-twit: • All ?of-tile grantor's intgmst in and -to: - From ttie'SW corner of the-NE 1/4'0€ petition 181 TowOship.° 29 'Sbuth; Rahge' 16 Eas t , run S 89.Q W* 55"., ast, - along the' a•??cuo Ekst-West center line o4 said Section 18,-200:0 ft. for P.0'.S. ; thence continue S .890 40' SS" Uat,: along tote East- -? , the West center line -of 'said ?Sectiop. Mi -324.57- ft. to'.. r c center -litre of Khmer Ave. ; ; thence N 1° 0.1' 28" Eaef, ' ' ' •? "4 --. along, the center line of Kilmer -Ave. 330'.03 ft. to the-- T== South .line of Gulf'to Bay Acres lire Addition aa recorAea y' id Plat Boom 51, Pate.'55,:,-af the-Public Records of Pinellas ' - ' ~ . ° County,, Florida; thence' N 890, 41-` 18` West; = a]iting the South. i--- ' a G• line of said Gulf to Hay Acres. First :AddilxLZ_ 324. 50 ft: ;- thence S 1°• 02"1 13" Won t, - 33Q.02. ft. to the, P.O.B: ' Less• the. South 50.0 ft. aild the- East 30.0 ft, • `for, road r"iglit-of- way' • : 'This quit'clititn deed oonfinn the'grantor 's.intention to convey all of her - ' ' '-; interest. in- the above-Ldescribed pareai_in her deed dated Diaaelit>r 30, 1992, j firwor&dh 0.1. • Book 8136 r Page 36 F ,Pinellas Gbuntyr Yloritia, Public e • ' ieoo>ads .. ' ° ' t - - . `. ,, .-' ?• -• -. ' • - , • •t ?"d to How- title lanes together with' atf and s(n• ulac L6 ` g apptutenancef_llwat?»!o •• , v belonging or 41111 anywise •pppertairsing, and u11 the estate, right, t(ile,'(nteresf; Gen, pally and elalm•whal- r 160-oe of the IWd (lrsl; y 7l iir in-law or p9WIY; to the onli prophase. btinihi pn'etbaflbof of4ha said seconj,pari7 fonts. - .; hf[[{1(y Tk. slld If' -Party -has donod pnd?sealad them prosepts tlty 404- pr ° ? ? "f trstY hbo6i wiltfpc.• - . : - e - - •, .. .. • . ?' : S(gned• sea7?a(dand delivered in I'IiMCe 4: at C= ..... ._............ ...... ....:............».:? O Print Nam t D. Jones Pauline ?+ ..: ............. ..... .............. ...'..... ..y...... ............ ?..... ?........•..........,_. ..a L f- a print NWMI. L: Jonas ? 2 u STATE OF FLORIDA, COVNTY•OF .,Pn;=m _ 2 Q it I HEREBY- CERTIFY that •on this day, before me, an n- tJ cflierir -duly. authorited is the State a(ortiod and in tltt County aforesaid so take acknowkdAmtnts, personally apptared` to the jiown lo-6eltAt Person described 4a and who. eireuted the (ongoing •insltument and She acknowledged be(am me that, She uecuted the same. t WITNESS my hand, and'.oiftcial seal in the County and State last a(orruid this 11 diy of i2, A. D. 1994 rr Noltitiiie'.'.' ........ V" t ALVA L it1NE5 x ' i atM. Dasenrrre ak t . ? t) eo.ws •+a loan ttesa tatllnsara - 'Air IIWMM rnt prpatrd by: Milton D. Jones, Attorney ca 501 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Suite 206 a ?`?` CleatwatQ.r, Florida 34616 KARLEEN F. DEBLAKER, CLERK RECORb VERIFIED BY: p Pinellas County Property Appr*r Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 00 Page 1 of 7 Appraisal. information Building information Map, 0.20 mile radius Same area, Land Use, Property Use codes, etc. Same area, Sales Info 1/8 mile aerial photo (2002) Back to Search Page Q Questions fibout 10 Thix' View Comparable Non-Residential Sales Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes. We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value. Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. If there are insufficient sales to conduct a market analysis then older sales may also be considered. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market. Appraisal Information 4 0 N i W 0 cat r 8 http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=l &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 00 Page 2 of 7 13 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 0400 26-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:44:20 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales ROPHIE, ALAN OBK: 08632 OPG: 0326 ROPHIE, RALPH BETECH, CECILA COHEH, CHERYL C/O ALBA CONSULTING CORP 1420 COURT ST EVAC: Non-EUAC CLEARWATER FL 33756-6147 Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 267.03 2003 l f 2004 - sa es rom : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 01 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 671,200 Homestead: HO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: HO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 671,200 Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 671,200 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 15,596.81 1) 150 x 280 iZ.00 42,000.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 iS, 596. 81 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 15, 596.81 Short Legal E 150FT OF W 494.57FT OF H 28OFT OF S 33OFT OF SW 1/4 l Description OF HE 114 Building Information J ? J o 0 .? C\1 U ?Q U • A. http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprie r Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 0? Property and Land Use Code descriptions • Building I • Buildin.? 2 • Building 3 Building #1 Page 3 of 7 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 0400 :01 26-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:44:20 Commercial Card 01 of 3 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 S-truc-tural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Orgwall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 9 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,959 Effective Age 31 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,518 7) . 00 0 2) Canopy .25 300 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fea-tur?es Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) ASPHALT 16660 1.75 16,660 29,160 29,160 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 29,160 Building #2 tJD o o t N Uj ?i cr U _ CL- http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 Pinellas County Property Appwr Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 00 Page 4 of 7 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 0400 :02 26-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas: County Property Appraiser 12:44:20 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 Struc?ural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 18 Party Wall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,959 Effective Age 35 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 6,000 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) . 00 0 12) 00 0 Commercial E xt r a F e a? ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) 00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 S) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 (C-1 C.= ILU o 0 N I w U cq ? C Q 916. http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=l &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 Pinellas County Property Appwr Inforniation: 18 29 16 00000 130 00 Page 5 of 7 18 / 29 / 16 / 00000 / 130 r 0400 :03 26-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:44:20 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 S-truc?ural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating, & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,966 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 3, 000 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 B) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) .00 0 4) 00 0 io) .00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) .00 0 12) 00 0 Femur s Camm(--rcial ExTrza Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map Ficlc [+-] ® ` = N U http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 0? Page 6 of 7 qp ? _ r cl ?j r3 ts. ii.7LJ7 0 L n I .. -7_ 7Q 70 7() 7 . It] fS7 r24(S) CHAUCER ? fifJ(5 ua:. IIbc57 01 w 4+ 10 17 la 120 (5) 129(s) IratS, 14 13 a liar{S7 12 0 flu 0 12 HELLEY I I Ira I I?-.c J3/r1 l C?J, Di I co +J 4, 2 4 i L17 j c cu TO TO 3337 C .1 Ac?c? cu AY PARK TWIN LADES MOBILE HOME PARK 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) 0 M ru 7S TO 70 7D 70 3 4 5 ro 22 21 20 Is Is 4 7 70 70 % Fr ! 20I: 10 13/06s h ? ?, I .a.rt?'I rte I . -4 A ri 240 mmmnmmmff? SAY 0 CO 0 C N W http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--0.2&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 Pinellas County Property App 1w r Information: IS 29 16 00000 130 U Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen Page 7 of 7 Q o W ? V Q a rw http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3'?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &t3=1 &u=0&p... 4/26/2006 • s RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CRY OF CLEARWATEP ALBA -® Consulting Corp-® Licensed Real Estate Broker September 1, 2005 John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: CROSS ACCESS FOR PARCEL INGRESS/EGRESS City Application No.: FLD2005-07075 DC Customs (Parcel ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0400) 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodtler: ALBA Consulting Corporation (ALBA) presently manages the subject property (Parcel ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0400) for the owner, the Rophie Family Trust, being reviewed by the City of Clearwater in this Comprehensive Infill Application (FLD2005-07075). ALBA also manages the contiguously owned property to the west (Parcel ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0200 and 18/29/16/00000/130/0300). The purpose of this letter is to confirm that all existing tenants, including the potential tenant for the 9,000 SF building made part of this application, will be provided legal cross access rights from parcel to parcel for the purpose of ingress/egress to the subject parcel being leased. Very truly yours, J hn Atanasio President CC: LA Civil, Scott Lincoln RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARiMEM CITY OF CLEARWAIER 1420 Court Street • Clearwater, Florida 33756 • (727) 443-0718 • Fax (727) 447-2369 Shopping Center Professionals Management • Leasing • Sales 6 " 11, • iL /Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. April 26, 2006 John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE: PROPOSED CAR QUEST AUTO PARTS @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD. Case Number/Address: (to be assigned) / 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd Applicant: Rophie Family Partnership c/o ALB Consulting Corp 1420 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727.447-2369, Engineer's E-MAIL: slincoln a,LACivil.con: Dear Mr. Schodtler: We have attached the following items to supplement a Flexible Development Application for this project to be reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Project: • (1) ALBA Consulting Corporation Check No. 1417 for $1,205 (Application Fee) • (1) Original Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project) • (1) Project Narrative & Legal Description • (1) Copy of Property Deed • (1) Copy Property Appraiser Record Card & Aerial Photo • (1) ALBA Letter RE: Cross Access to adjacent contiguously owned parcels • (1) Copy of CAR QUEST Typical Building, Sign and Image Elevations (8.5 x 11 photos) • (1) Comprehensive Landscape Program Requirements Application • (1) Copy of Signed & Sealed Survey • (1) Signed & Sealed Set of Site & Landscape Plan Sets (w/ (1) 8.5 x 11 copy) • (14) Copies/Packages (including all of the above documents) Please contact our office if you have any further questions regarding the project. We look forward to your completeness approval followed review of the project before the DRC on June 1, 2006 and the City of Clearwater CDB on July_18, 2006. Sincerely, LA Civil Scott Lincoln, President Cc: John AVAnasio, President of ALBA Consulting Corporation (Owners' Agent) 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com ALCO CENTER A AMSOUTH,BANK 1417 CIO ALBA.CONSULTING CLEARWATER, FL 1420 COURT ST. 63-4661631 121 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 4/26/2006 m m o PAY TO THE City Of Clearwater ORDER OF $*1,205.00 o One Thousand Two Hundred Five Only DOLLARS n w City of Clearwater Planning Department y 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 LL a MEMO Comprehensive Infill - ------ "? ?, AU ORIZED I NATURE, 11800 L4 L711' 1:063 1046681: 3 2834685 11' I r ORIGINAL FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Date Received: 04/27/2006 CAR QUEST AUTO PARTS ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 290B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet • • CITY OF% CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 October 10, 2006 ALBA CONSULTING JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 VIA FAX: No Fax LA y-7 - 23e09 RE: FLD2006-04022 (Located at 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD) Dear : ALBA CONSULTING JOHN ATANASIO There has been no activity with regards to your application, case number: FLD2006-04022 in the last thirty (30) days. Please find attached comments related to this case that are still outstanding. Please contact our office with the status of your resubmittal prior to : Wednesday, November 1, 2006 Please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582 should you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, John Schodder, Planner II cc: File 30 Day No Activity Letter 'R11 Landscape Curbing Condition • 0 Conditions Associated With FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD John Schodtler 06/13/2006 Add the following note to the landscape plan prior to any building or site permits: Per Section Not Met 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade.NOT MET Dumpster Enclosure to Code Tom Glenn 05/18/2006 That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Acess to Dumpster Not Met must be from Shelly St Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 562-4930 727-562-4547 06/08/2006 Revise Project Site Data table on the cover sheet to state "Front (South - Commercial)" NOT MET Not Met 6/8/2006 Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise 06/13/2006 If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscaping (grass) is Not Met proposed?.NOT MET 06/13/2006 Show proposed outdoor lighting to be utilized for security on site plan. D.O. CONDITION Not Met 05/18/06 Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. 06/13/2006 Strike or remove this from the project narrative that is resubmitted.NOT MET Not Met Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is incorrect. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." 06/13/2006 Provide 15 sets of colored building elevations (including color swatches/cards). Also provide Not Met building dimensions to plans. NOT MET 06/13/2006 The building elevation provided appears to be labelled incorrectly. The North Elevation should be Not Met twice the width of either the north or south - this will look like an error to the CDB members. Revise or provide more accurate building elevations. NOT MET Print Date: 10/10/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 t Oct. 10 2006 03:28PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94472369 Oct.10 03:27PM 00'56 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). ?yf?X.y ;E,00 f Landscape Curbing Condition econditions Associated With FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD John Schodtler 06/13/2006 Add the following note to the landscape plan prior to any building or site permits: Per Section Not Met 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade.NOT MET Dumpster Enclosure to Code Tom Glenn 562-4930 . 05/18/2006 That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Acess to Dumpster Not Met must be from Shelly St Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 727-562-4547 Z, 06/08/2006 Revise Project Site Data table on the cover sheet to state "Front (South - Commercial)" NOT MET Not Met 6/8/2006 Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise 3 06/13/2006 If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscaping (grass) is Not Met proposed? NOT MET *-06/13/2006 Show proposed outdoor lighting to be utilized for security on site plan. D.O. CONDITION Not Met 05/18/06 Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. 41.06/13/2006 Strike or remove this from the project narrative that is resubmitted.NOT MET Not Met Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is incorrect. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." $. 06/13/2006 Provide 15 sets of colored building elevations (including color swatches/cards). Also provide Not Met building dimensions to plans. NOT MET 06/13/2006 The building elevation provided appears to be labelled incorrectly. The North Elevation should be Not Met twice the width of either the north or south - this will look like an error to the CDB members. Revise or provide more accurate building elevations. NOT MET Print Date: 07/03/2006 CaseConditom Page 1 of 1 Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Sc nTT L- gc'0L' -) FAX: "40- 9 0 5-D FROM: 3Oh.a s Phone: DATE: t.) ? U 3 O 6 SUBJECT: C At?,-Qyes-r - FL Zooeb - O4 oz2 MESSAGE: T dwphk NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) • I N Jul. 03 2006 01:19PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469050 Jul.03 01:17PM 01'05 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). N June 8, 2006 M /V/L Lincoln Associates Civil Engineering Group, Inc. John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS Proposed CarQuest (043-003) FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodder: ORIGINAL RECEIVED V i?i 0 J 2J 36 PIANNIh : I::. , ,;FGI,11 CITY Or On behalf of the applicant, Alba Consulting Corporation, LA Civil is submitting a response to the following DRC Staff Comments received from you during the DRC Meeting on 6/1/06. The comments are presented in normal print followed by our responses in italics. Engineering Condition (Steve Doherty 562-4773) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. Contact Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Response: Acknowledged. Prior to CO: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Response: The Site Plan has been noted accordingly to comply. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. Environmental Condition (Ed Chesney 562-4742) Indicate how stormwater will be directed into swale with 6-inch curb between parking lot and swale, Sheet 4. Response: 1446 Court Street - Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 - Fax: (727) 446-9050 - E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com MW CarQuest (FLD2006-02" 043-003.100 06/08/06 Page 2 of 7 Fire Condition (James Keller 562-4327 x3062) No Issue's Landscape Curbing Condition (John Schodtler 727-562-4547) D, Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks have a minimum height of six inches above grade. ORICsM RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2006 V;ANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER vehicular and pedestrian traffic by devices along the perimeter of any . These protective devices shall 0-0 46 Response: The site plan has been revised to include wheel stops and curbing where applicable. 2 E f v6ndscape (John Schodtler 727-562-4547) L ndscape buffer along Gulf To Bay Blvd. Vlot all landscape buffers are dimensioned on the landscape plan. Revise Response: Landscape Plan has been revised to include buffer dimensions. Indicate interior landscaped areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled on the site plan (the landscape plan is will be too busy to show these areas). Q Response: The revised plans include interior green area plan. r installing the 15 foot Provide written and photographic evidence showing hardship with regards to esponse: The owner presently has a lease with enterprise rent-a-car on the subject portion of the operty. Due to this business arrangement the owner cannot interrupt the site frontage to provide for 1 S ft buffer along GTB. In addition, enterprise rent-a-car leased the property with the existing access iveways. A 1 Sft buffer would impact their access which would be unacceptable to enterprise rent-a- r. We have provided several photographs attached to demonstrate the existing property conditions. Land Resource Condition (Rick Albee 727-562-4741) No Issues. Storm Water Condition (Bob Maran 562-4592) Prior to CDB: The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. Response: Our plans demonstrate a reduction in impervious area and should result in no attenuation of stormwater. However, we have provided the onsite swale for the purpose of stormwater treatment from the repaved northern parking area. We understand that due to no outfall control structure being provided, demonstration of adequate infiltration will be required. We request that this be a condition for final building approval. MW ORIGINgI CarQuest (FLD2006-04022) RECENED 043-003.100 06/08/06 JUN 0 8 2006 Page 3 of 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Dumpster Enclosure to Code (Tom Glenn 562-4930) That dumpster enclosures(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Access to Dumpster must be from Shelly St Response: The site plan indicates that the dumpster enclosure if required will comply with the City specifications. However, the owner or tenant may elect to use black barrel service. Traffic Eng Condition (Bennett Elbo 562-4775) 1. Parallel parking spaces shall comply with current City dimensional standards (8' wide by 23' long). Community Development Code Section 3-1402 Response: The site plan has been revised accordingly. 2. On street parking spaces shall not encroach into any through lanes. Response: No onstreet parking spaces encroach into any through lanes. 3. On street parking shall not be counted as required number of parking spaces as these can be removed by the City. Response: Acknowledged. 4. Provide a notarized letter to the City's Traffic Operations Division that reads: "It is agreed that in the event that on street parking spaces are removed for any reason by the City of Clearwater, the owner will not seek compensation of any kind". Response: Please see attached letter 5. Show on driveway to Shelley Street and the intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Kilmer Avenue 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles. Response: Site triangles have shown on the site plan and landscape plan. 6. Remove any object that interferes with sight distance (parallel parking spaces along Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street). Response: It does not appear that any above ground objects will conflict with onstreet parking or the depicted site triangles. 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. Response: The existing lease between the owner and enterprise rent-a-car will not allow for access modifications. 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. MW CarQuest (FLD2006-04 L 043-003.100 06/08/06 Page 4 of 7 ORlGItVAi. RECENED JUN 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Response: We would like to defer consideration of this issue to the building permit process as sidewalks would need to be permitted through FDOT. 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. Response: The parking for enterprise rent-a-car and display area have been depicted on the site plan. 10. Additional comments may result from review of submittal of the above information. Response: Acknowledged. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. Zoning Condition (John Schodtler 727-5624547) rovide 15 copies of formal building elevations for the subject site prior to proceeding to the Community Development Board (CDB). Response: Please find 15 copies of building elevations included in the revised plans resubmitted herein. Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet a to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise Response: The enterprise rent-a-car setback has been depicted on the cover sheet. Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (2) Required parking spaces for D retail sales/service are 5 parking spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of gfa, not 1.5 as referencing vehicle service in the IRT zoning. Revise and show required and proposed parking counts for both the retail sales business, enterprise rent a car business (2.5 spaces/1000 sf of lot display area), and grand totals. Response: The corrected parking ratios and total parking have been depicted on cover sheet. f the proposed canopy over the front entrance on Kilmer Avenue is not affixed to the ground than it cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). If it is affixed to ground than a request for reduction to the front setback from Kilmer Avenue is required. &Xlfvv MW CarQuest (FLD2006-04" 043-003.100 06/08/06 Page 5 of 7 L*K-ANAL M RECENED JUN 0 8 2006 p~G DEPARTMENT ICrjy Of CLEARWATER Response: The subject canopy has been removed. CarQuest intends to instruct a storefront as depicted on the building elevations. Sheet 3 indicates 16 parallel off street parking spaces, but the plan only shows 8. - also indicates 30 total spaces, but the plan shows 28. Clarify or revise. Response: The total parking counts have been depicted on the revised cover sheet. V Clarify what type of fence is proposed along Shelly Street. Response: There will be no fencing proposed. The response to General Applicability Criteria #6 is difficult to visuallize ("the proposed use will provide architectural, visual... improvements to revitalize the property...") without the proposed building elevations. Response: The owner is aware that this property cannot fully achieve the GTB corridor criteria. However, we still contend that the improvements proposed will enhance the area and revitalize the property. Ola% The response to Comprehensive Infill criteria #1 should address the parking, setback, & landscaping reductions with regards to impracticality without deviations. Response: In addition to restrictions via the lease between the owner and enterprise rent-a-car, the overlay of current City code requirements for parking, setbacks, and landscaping clearly indicates to us that the amount of property remaining for vehicular parking and circulation would cause space c constraints making the property unusable. For instance, a 15ft buffer along the GTB frontage would impact parking, circulation, and vehicle display area, as well as signage and right of way access. Hence, we feel it is clear that deviation from these requirements is necessary for enterprise rent-a-car to remain operational. The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #6 ends with "are in the direction of the city LDC and its goals along the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along Gulf to Bay. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". 0 Response: The owner is aware that this property cannot fully achieve the GTB corridor criteria. However, we still contend that the improvements proposed will enhance the area and revitalize the property. The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #7 ends with "and the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along the Gulf to Bay corridor. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". Response: The owner is aware that this property cannot fully achieve the GTB corridor criteria. However, we still contend that the improvements proposed will enhance the area and revitalize the CarQuest (FLD2006-04 22 043-003.100 06/08/06 Page 6 of 7 M ORIQW1 RECENED JUN 08 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT property. CITY OF C:I FARWATER Provide documentation confirming Comprehensive Infill Criteria #8 - adequate off street parking is ci available to be shared with adjacent property, in addition to the proposed on street parking. Response: The project is requesting a waiver to the parking requirements since the proposed tenant, CarQuest, does not project the need for the quantity of parking proposed. Hence, the need for shared parking does not exist for this tenant. Provide gross floor areas for All retail, office, adult entertainment, and vehicle repair uses (and lots sales area for vehicle sales/rentals on both properties to complete the shared parking analysis. Response: The project is requesting a waiver to the parking requirements since the proposed tenant, CarQuest, does not project the need for the quantity of parking proposed. Hence, the need for shared parking does not exist for this tenant. indicated in the project proposal will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program /ignage CSP) approval to increase the sign area above the maximum 24 square feet. Please note that SP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. Response: Acknowledged. evise all site plans to show site visibility triangle at GTB and Kilmer Response: The site plan has been revised accordingly. evise all site plans to include existing vehicle display area(s) and customer parking spaces. Response: The site plan has been revised accordingly. Revise site and landscape plan to include all overhead utility lines and poles. Response: The site and landscape plans have been revised accordingly. If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscaping (grass) is proposed? PLAN SHOWS NOTHING. Response: Please see attached Landscape Plan Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. DResponse: CarQuest is 7AM--5PM operation. Site lighting will likely be provided as needed.for proper security. Op, Page 3 of the Comp Landscape plan, the notary did not complete his portion of the form. vise and resubmit for the form to be valid. Response: Please find attached the dated notarized form. Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is rW CarQuest (FLD2006-0" so 043-003.100 06/08/06 Page 7 of 7 incorrect. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." 10 Response: Please strike the statement: "AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION". roposal exceeds 25% of building valuation according to Paul Newman with PCPA ($221,600) taken on May 19, 2006. Response: We agree and acknowledge that this may be possible; however, we have no formal estimates of the project work at this time. Explain how the delivery of parts to local installers is done. The project narrative indicates 85% of Carquests business is done in this manner. Also, How many delivery vehicles will there be and where will they be parked/stored when the business is closed. Response: CarQuest operates delivery with 2 or 3 pickup trucks which will be stored on site in the parking area when the business is closed. Provide an itemized break down of $60,000 project valuation. You have exceeded the 25% improvement provision of the Parking and Landscaping code that requires compliance with all of both code sections. Per PCPA, Paul Newman the valuation of the just the buildings is $221,600 Response: We agree and acknowledge that this may be possible; however, we have no formal estimates of the project work at this time. The following documents are attached to supplement your review of the above responses to comments: • (1) Copies of Letter from ALBA re: Offstreet Parking • (1) Revised & Dated Page 3 of Comprehensive Landscape Form • (1) Copies of Property Survey (Sigend & Sealed) • (15) Copies Signed & Sealed Revised Sets of Site & Landscape Plan Sets (11x17) • (15) Copies of Revised Building & Sign Elevations (11x17) If you haye-apy q LA ScoPres CC: or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call. Sinc4dent ORIGINAL RECEWED Alba Consulting JUN 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER • • Schodtler, John From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 3:47 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net; Schodtler, John; Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: RE: CarQuest Scott, We have been consistent in our requirements for this site since the 6/1/06 DRC Meeting. I verified again today with our Stormwater Division that the following comment must be satisfied: "The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test." Per our Emails last week, the double ring infiltration test could be deferred to building permit. A case very similar to this was reviewed last week. In that case, the engineer met with our Stormwater Division and devised a plan that allowed for the submission of calculations that demonstrated that attenuation was not required. If signed and sealed calculations demonstrate the same for this site, no attenuation will be required. This has been a consistent requirement for projects of this type. We are available and ready to work with you to resolve this situation, however the first step in the solution is for you to submit the calculations requested at the 6/1/06 DRC Meeting. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:34 AM To: Rice, Scott Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CarQuest Scott I just need to know what your conclusions is re: the "Property Description" for this project. Section 8 footnote * allows the City Engnineer to be the determining authority. Again, we think the reduction of impervious be removal of pavement and pavement overlay should NOT cause this project to be considered re-development. Hence, if the C is reduced, no attenuation is required. Please give me your final answer. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com [mailto:Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com] 1 • Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 1. 0 PM To: Scott Lincoln Cc: Robert.Maran@myClearwater.com; John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: CarQuest Scott, Section 8 of the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria provides the City criteria for determining required storm water detention. The required calculations are based upon the change of runoff coefficient resulting from the project, not impervious area. Please submit signed and sealed calculations prepared based upon the criteria in the manual. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:37 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: CarQuest Scott I have attached our Pre versus Post impervious calculations, considering the historically paved area as pervious, as it appears today. We are still proposing less pavement than exists today, so attenuation is not required. Scott 2 • • Schodtler, John From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:10 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Maran, Robert (Bob); 'Scott Lincoln' Subject: FLD2006-04022 - 2430 Gulf to Bay John, Engineering has completed review of the subject application and updated Permit Plan. Approval conditions include: Prior to building permit, a right-of-way permit shall be obtained for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent City streets. Prior to CO, sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to CO, comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com f t • Page 1 of 3 Schodtler, John From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:36 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: Schodtler, John; alba.consulting@verizon.net; Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - CarQuest The DRI can be a building permit condition provided the valued used in the calculations is reasonable. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:24 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Schodtler, John; alba.consulting@verizon.net; Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - CarQuest The requirement for the DRI will significantly delay us. Can we use SCS published values and run the DRI later? Scott -----Original Message----- From: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com [mailto:Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:45 AM To: Scott Lincoln Cc: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com; alba.consulting@verizon.net; Robert. Maran@myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2006-04022 - CarQuest Scott, The 1968 aerial photo is not clear enough for me to evaluate. I reviewed a City photo from 1990 that indicates the area may not have been paved. The limits and condition of the broken asphalt in the subject area indicate it could have been dumped there. To end this exchange of Emails and resolve this matter, please respond to the comment from the 6/1/06 DRC Meeting: "The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test." 6/21/2006 ? • Page 2 of 3 If the signed and sealed calculations indicate that attenuation is not required, the issue is resolved. If the calculations indicate that attenuation is required, we need to make sure that sufficient area is provided for the pond and that it will drawdown in 24-hours. My concern is that if attenuation is required and sufficient area is not allocated now, it will be a problem when the building permit application is submitted. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln (mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 12:39 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Schodtler, John; alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: CaQuest Scott: Please the following items attached: 1. Existing versus Proposed Area Tabulations 2. 1968 Aerial (showing apparent historical pavement limit) 3. Existing Conditions from the recent Survey (delineating the historical pavement line) 4. Site Plan (showing the proposed conditions) 5. Photo of broken historical asphalt I have provided Exhibit 1 to demonstrate the Pre vs. Post Impervious comparison. What I need you to understand is that there is an area north of the building that has historically been paved. Hence, the Pre impervious is greater than the Post impervious. This will result in a lower rational coefficient in the Post condition and will result in NO ATTENUATION. I have attached Exhibit 2 above to demonstrate the apparent historical pavement limits. We have plotted this line and tabulated the area of pavement on Exhibit 3. Exhibit 4 is the proposed Site Plan and Exhibit 5 is a photo of this area showing broken asphalt. All indications are that this area was paved and should be credited as such. Therefore, we think you can agree that attenuation is not required. Please respond. Thanks, Scott Lincoln, PE President LA Civil 6/21/2006 e. . i 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Main Identity From: "Scott Lincoln" <slincoln@LACivil.com> To: <Scott. Rice@myC lea rwater. corn> Cc: <John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com>; <alba.consulting@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 12:39 PM Attach: EXHIBIT_1.pdf; EXHIBIT_2.pdf; EXHIBIT_3.pdf; EXHIBIT_4.pdf; EXHIBIT_5.pdf Subject: CaQuest n Scott: /L C -j Please the following items attached: 1. Existing versus Proposed Area Tabulations 2. 1968 Aerial (showing apparent historical pavement limit) 3. Existing Conditions from the recent Survey (delineating the historical pavement line) 4. Site Plan (showing the proposed conditions) 5. Photo of broken historical asphalt I have provided Exhibit 1 to demonstrate the Pre vs. Post Impervious comparison. What I need you to understand is that there is an area north of the building that has historically been paved. Hence, the Pre impervious is greater than the Post impervious. This will result in a lower rational coefficient in the Post condition and will result in NO ATTENUATION. I have attached Exhibit 2 above to demonstrate the apparent historical pavement limits. We have plotted this line and tabulated the area of pavement on Exhibit 3. Exhibit 4 is the proposed Site Plan and Exhibit 5 is a photo of this area showing broken asphalt. All indications are that this area was paved and should be credited as such. Therefore, we think you can agree that attenuation is not required. Please respond. Thanks, Scott Lincoln, PE President LA Civil No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/367 - Release Date: 6/16/2006 6/16/2006 A • SOUTH JANE OF GIJLF'1'0 BAY ACRES FIRS1' AUA11'10N PLAT' BOOK 52, PAGE. SS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APPROXIMATE R/W LINE ? I /1' DEEP WATER QUALITY PROPOSED (5) ONSTRE?.I TREATMENT SWALE FOR PARKING SPA S SHELLY ST I NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. , (0'N1GNT-OF-Lt!91' SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 PROP ED PEDESTRIAN RAMP & LANDI G PER CRY OF CLEARWATER ENCLOSURE DGMPSTER A ;ND X 109, AND FOOT INDEX 304 (TYP) (PER CITY STANDARDS) - ? ............................. N 89°41'18" W 324.50' 23' JFLUME (TYP) .... 20' SIGNT R \ 7ICAL ANGLE N R9°41294.50' p. + CURB (TYP) 2 LANDSCAPE o x??#„,f .D o l ~II ?< r BUFFER c € o '? ? I I A / I A TO Z EXISTING I AUTO CARE? I y ( FLUME (TYP)r=» al . I I ' FIRE lY -H 12.73' YDRANT ONE ,.I? o=?> = ?- SIDEWALK 23. uv ?: y I; I , T(iY U I I. II n,:.Yr.. rr..: I, s.-ONRY .;:w 23' "BS I I I; a GREEN - a I: , G 24 I s 1 7/ z - I 5' ' DEI N SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS CON RETEI l I I ! FOR STORE FRONT 15' Sf 8' ' II SIDE ACK i A r.:rr CARQUES 5' 5 : k. ... .c1- =..--r..t_..._ .------ - - 25.52. 4 - 6,000 T_._._ XIST1 SF ? ? I I RETAIL AREA zm I :ORIVEG AISLE 8• ovr. < II W I I I pl woR), i s p. r 1 >t,?at aY EXISTING ! I DEMISING WALL . ::: ' I ; l3 I a w W 0l -.- ? I 911c y l i I W z: 3.000 SF lo':Yli Q,;?_I I C t STORAGE AREA = PROPOSED 30 SF TENANT °I I I 'I cW .a,nn I I SIGN ON WALL - ! I c W ?y , Y 4 (- G ccm 4 '0 +:r 1 s7'oN?' ^j •:a:' r,.F,. 22.92' I COV. Con oN ...r . I I I I I g U U //JJ? s c. I RETAIL SHOPS w w I .r f 1. _ sONE ROPOSELS XI 2) ONSTREET PARKING CES nt.\mvar j II o -'? "ti-..?-SQA f "rnV'I .I L•B, 1 c Fr U¦swwwz.unr¦ j I II 1 ,tS.17'HEEAS'1'311' ENTERPRIS4 2 .o- PROPOSED 5' ................. RENT A-CAR LANDSCAPE n , r BUFFER '" ? i n. '°'V20.6 4' .......... ..... m PftOPCJSED 5' WIDE E Tj NCR n .`, I ¦ m I GP ..._?.... _._.__ ................._..,?g'I ~e............._........6DASM LINE DEPICTS - I I51 <? I I I a 3.50 SF OF ENTERPRISE w' _.... ..... _ _..... _.... ._.. 1CL DISPLAY AREA yi :t. PL\. ^i W'CI.i'tin?;.l, t':?'__?^ ,•f ?( AVa:.\l:,„ ` LOT LINE 44.57i LOT LINE/100' LOT LINE 150 I y . aai` o. ,.rer N-a.,ms r v S 89140155" E 294.5 7' _wm r _q PROPOSED -RAVP-& 42.75' DRIVEWAY ; 1 62.42' DRIVEWAY 144.8' DRIVEWAY LANDING PER CIRY OF CLEARWATER ;INDEX 109, AND FOOT INDEX 304 (TYP) ............... ..._.............,M,;anmr,:w<......... ...................... ................. ........_).... ..... EXISTING PEDESTRIAN... RAMP . ......... .......- GULF TO BAY BLVD - - ... -- . 94646' 55" F. -324-.5-T - - -`, i (10' Rl(11 r O%?-!i'.S 1' ? ! ......_.. - ......_ . __ ................. .Fi v - n ..._.__... ....._.. ...... ......... ............ _........ _ .. ......... ... ......... ... ...... SURVEY EXISTING PAVEMENT LIMITS 5C)U'(R 1.1 F OF'GULP T'(I UAY.eCRES F RST AUDITION i / 1'L•5'I OOK 52, PA(:F SS 61TH10111"OF.R'AI j - - - SHELLEY n T _ ?......_.__....._._ \ R!r°41'I N" K' J2d.511' ? ??a:r.c•:r:,,,.:.k A. .I... ....?... _....... _?r__ .:: ............... _. _.: - - t i n, u,.:: ... -? trll --_ ro.:ruu..:.n h i? .. '.,??-/1...?.• NR?°dl'IB I a 1. ? L. I 3 I ,x1sJ5'ax y y. I 1 'Ia I : 'arrl.Ix.w, __F ,;.r ,1 589°40'SS"E 294.51 I APPARENT HISTORICAL PAVEMENT LIMITS I ---------- --- w° ---- Lam; s A? lei : l r? ' i r ro. s I I I 1 ' I 1 I I I i I 1 Q 1 1 I '!: I j III I I I! 1 III .............. LESS THF, EAST30' 1 i I! 1 II 1 '?I I .I 1 III 1 yl I I, CNSITE HISTORICAL ' PAVED AREA (3,893 SF) II I, 1 II it I II I !I II 17y Z -; ?I } k7 e u fl ,.., I I IS- I T CE\TER LINE OF i l'. 29 S., RGE'. J6 E. 17 I % 5. 87 40' 55" E. O'N. ? 324.57' 9 GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD ---- / ?'?/-'- v IrIJ'RfG1/2'-x)F-N:.1 )' I W , J j. J • Schodtler, John From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:28 PM To: 'slincoln@LACivil.com' Cc: Schodtler, John; Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: FW: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay DSC03777.]PG DSC03779.]PG DSC03780.]PG DSC03785.JPG Scott, There is an error in the following Email sent today at 2:14 pm. In the second sentence of the fifth paragraph, the existing strip along the ROW is described as impervious while the photographs clearly show that this area is pervious. Please pardon the mistake. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:14 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net; Schodtler, John; Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott, I am not sure why this is such an issue to you. Submit the calculations that were requested in the comments from the June 1st DRC Meeting: "The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test." If the calculations support your case, the issue is resolved. If the calculations indicate that attenuation is required, we need to make sure that sufficient area is provided for the pond and that it will drawdown in 24-hours. My concern is that if attenuation is required and sufficient area is not allocated now, it will be a problem when the building permit application is submitted. To refresh our memories on the site, John and I did a quick field review this afternoon. In its existing condition, the north side of the property consists of a pervious strip along the building that is wider than the proposed green area, a paved drive aisle and another impervious strip adjacent the ROW that is wider than the proposed treatment swale. Clearly, after redevelopment, the site will have more impervious area than exists today. See attached photos taken on North side of existing building. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com 1 0 • -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:29 AM To: Rice, Scott Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net; Schodtler, John Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay So, by overlaying existing paving we should NOT be considered re-development, correct? Because that is what we are doing. Nonetheless, John, if this is all wrapped up and understood, we should still be on the July CDB correct? Scott -----Original Message----- From: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com [mailto:Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:16 AM To: Scott Lincoln Cc: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com; Robert.Maran@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay No, restriping a parking lot does not require attenuation. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:03 AM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Schodtler, John; alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay I would classify this project as removal of pavement, and pavement overlay in existing paved areas, NOT re-development. If we were overlaying a shopping center parking lot to restripe, etc., are you telling me it would be classified as re-development and stormwater attenuation would be required? Scott -----Original Message----- From: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com [mailto:Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:35 AM To: Scott Lincoln Cc: Robert.Maran@myClearwater.com; John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay The City credit for previous impermeable is a one-half credit. Therefore, a reduction of impermeable may or may not eliminate the need for attenuation depending upon the calculations. What would we call improving the site and building, adding green space, reworking the parking and adding drainage if not redevelopment? -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:23 AM To: Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John Cc: Maran, Robert (Bob); alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott 2 First, we are improving the site and building by adding green area and stormwater treatment. This is not re-development. When Lokey operated the site as a body shop and paint booth, the site reportedly was paved further to the north of the building than exists today. We are reducing the historical imperviousness in this area, in areas around the building perimeter, along the west side of the building, and we have proposed the removal of pavement for the 5' east buffer along the enterprise portion of the site. Hence, we need to agree that pavement is being reduced. With that said, the rational method comparison for the Pre- versus Post-Development conditions is truly a comparison of the Rational Coefficient (C) which we both know is effected by the ratio of impervious/pervious area. Hence, if the impervious area decreases, the C is less. This results in no attenuation requirements. However, we are providing 1/2" of treatment capacity in the proposed swale for the repaved impervious are north of the building. Can we agree that this is the case? If so, then we would like to defer any demonstration of infiltration until building permitting. I will gladly recap all such quantified calculations as part of the building permitting knowing that the Plan approval will require such. Lastly, we need to stay on the July CDB, or the owner risks losing this tenant. Respectfully, Scott Lincoln, PE LA Civil 727-446-9000 x 203 -----Original Message----- From: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com [mailto:Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:44 AM To: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com; Scott Lincoln Cc: Robert.Maran@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott, City stormwater design criteria provides a credit for redevelopment of a site, but does not eliminate the requirement for attenuation solely base upon reducing impervious area. This was not resolved at DRC. Before this case may proceed to CDB, it must be clear that there is sufficient area on the site allocated for stormwater treatment to meet city requirements. Sidewalks along Gulf to Bay can be addressed at building permit. With the Enterprise lease, the remaining comments will be deferred to future redevelopment of the site. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John 3 0 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:07 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott: These engineering comments came from Scott Rice (727-562-4781), so you will need to deal with him directly. I will copy him this email. John. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:37 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay John: 1. WE discussed the stormwater requirements at DRC. We are reducing pavement. Hence, Engineering should be clear that No Attenuation will result. As before, we are proposing the swale for water quality treatment from the repaved parking area. Can we please retain this comment as a CONDITION of Building Permitting instead of holding up CDB. Our responses for the following items are below per our submitted letter. 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. Response: The existing lease between the owner and enterprise rent-a-car will not allow for access modifications. 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. Response: We would like to defer consideration of this issue to the building permit process as sidewalks would need to be permitted through FDOT. 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. Response: The parking for enterprise rent-a-car and display area have been depicted on the site plan. This is our position and we need you to keep us on track for the next CDB meeting in July. Please call my cell. Respectfully, Scott Lincoln, PE LA Civil 727-446-9000 x 203 727-709-6951 (cell) 4 0 • -----Original Message----- From: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com [mailto:John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:00 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: FW: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay The following items were not addressed in your resubmittal. You will need to resubmit to Sherry Watkins before going on to the next Community Development Board (CDB) meeting on August 15th. The deadline for the next resubmittal is July 6th. John Schodtler STORMWATER The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. 6/12/06 - NOT MET - ATTENUATION NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT. NO DRAWDOWN CALCULATIONS OR INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED. TRAFFIC 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 6/12/06 NO RESPONSE 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 0 0 Schodtler, John From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:23 AM To: Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John Cc: Maran, Robert (Bob); alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott First, we are improving the site and building by adding green area and stormwater treatment. This is not re-development. When Lokey operated the site as a body shop and paint booth, the site reportedly was paved further to the north of the building than exists today. We are reducing the historical imperviousness in this area, in areas around the building perimeter, along the west side of the building, and we have proposed the removal of pavement for the 5' east buffer along the enterprise portion of the site. Hence, we need to agree that pavement is being reduced. With that said, the rational method comparison for the Pre- versus Post-Development conditions is truly a comparison of the Rational Coefficient (C) which we both know is effected by the ratio of impervious/pervious area. Hence, if the impervious area decreases, the C is less. This results in no attenuation requirements. However, we are providing 1/2" of treatment capacity in the proposed swale for the repaved impervious are north of the building. Can we agree that this is the case? If so, then we would like to defer any demonstration of infiltration until building permitting. I will gladly recap all such quantified calculations as part of the building permitting knowing that the Plan approval will require such. Lastly, we need to stay on the July CDB, or the owner risks losing this tenant. Respectfully, Scott Lincoln, PE LA Civil 727-446-9000 x 203 -----Original Message----- From: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com [mailto:Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com) Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:44 AM To: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com; Scott Lincoln Cc: Robert.Maran@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott, City stormwater design criteria provides a credit for redevelopment of a site, but does not eliminate the requirement for attenuation solely base upon reducing impervious area. This was not resolved at DRC. Before this case may proceed to CDB, it must be clear that there is sufficient area on the site allocated for stormwater treatment to meet City requirements. Sidewalks along Gulf to Bay can be addressed at building permit. With 1 0 0 the Enterprise lease, the remaining comments will be deferred to future redevelopment of the site. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:07 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay Scott These engineering comments came from Scott Rice (727-562-4781), so you will need to deal with him directly. I will copy him this email. John -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:37 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay John 1. WE discussed the stormwater requirements at DRC. We are reducing pavement. Hence, Engineering should be clear that No Attenuation will result. As before, we are proposing the swale for water quality treatment from the repaved parking area. Can we please retain this comment as a CONDITION of Building Permitting instead of holding up CDB. Our responses for the following items are below per our submitted letter. 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. Response: The existing lease between the owner and enterprise rent-a-car will not allow for access modifications. 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. Response: We would like to defer consideration of this issue to the building permit process as sidewalks would need to be permitted through FDOT. 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 2 • • Response: The parking for enterprise rent-a-car and display area have been depicted on the site plan. This is our position and we need you to keep us on track for the next CDB meeting in July. Please call my cell. Respectfully, Scott Lincoln, PE LA Civil 727-446-9000 x 203 727-709-6951 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com [mailto:John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:00 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: FW: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay The following items were not addressed in your resubmittal. You will need to resubmit to Sherry Watkins before going on to the next Community Development Board (CDB) meeting on August 15th. The deadline for the next resubmittal is July 6th. John Schodtler STORMWATER The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the,stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysi6 is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. 6/12/06 - NOT MET - ATTENUATION NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT. NO DRAWDOWN CALCULATIONS OR INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED. TRAFFIC 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 6/12/06 NO RESPONSE 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 9. On the Site Plan,'"show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 3 0 0 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:07 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 -Gulf to Bay Scott: These engineering comments came from Scott Rice (727-562-4781), so you will need to deal with him directly. I will copy him this email. John -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:37 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay John: 1. WE discussed.the stormwater requirements at DRC. We are reducing pavement. Hence, Engineering should be clear that No Attenuation will result. As before, we are proposing the swale for water quality treatment from the repaved parking area. Can we please retain this comment as a CONDITION of Building Permitting instead of holding up CDB. Our responses for the following items are below per our submitted letter. 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. Response: The existing lease between the owner and enterprise rent-a-car will not allow for access modifications. 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. Response: We would like to defer consideration of this issue to the building permit process as sidewalks would need to be permitted through FDOT. 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. Response: The parking for enterprise rent-a-car and display area have been depicted on the site plan. This is our position and we need you to keep us on track for the next CDB meeting in July. Please call my cell. Respectfully, 1 Scott Lincoln, PE LA Civil 727-446-9000 x 203 727-709-6951 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com [mailto:John.SchodtlerCmyClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:00 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: FW: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay The following items were not addressed in your resubmittal. You will need to resubmit to Sherry Watkins before going on to the next Community Development Board (CDB) meeting on August 15th. The deadline for the next resubmittal is July 6th. John Schodtler STORMWATER The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. 6/12/06 - NOT MET - ATTENUATION NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT. NO DRAWDOWN CALCULATIONS OR INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED. TRAFFIC 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 6/12/06 NO RESPONSE 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:31 AM To: 'slincoln@LACivil.com' Subject: FLD2006-04022 - Car Quest comments... Wn? EN, CaseConditionsAf ? ?xrFsry4"??,??y Landscape Curbing Condition • ' • Conditions Associated With FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Add the following note to the landscape plan: Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be Not Met protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade.NOT MET Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 05/15/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. 6/12/06 - NOT MET - ATTENUATION NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT. NO DRWADOWN CALCULATIONS OR INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED. Dumpster Enclosure to Code Tom Glenn 562-4930 That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Acess to Dumpster Not Met must be from Shelly St Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 05/19/2006 Parallel parking spaces shall comply with current City dimensional standards (8' wide by 23' long). Not Met Community Development Code Section 3-1402 6/12/06 - MET 2. On street parking spaces shall not encroach into any through lanes. 6/12/06 - MET 3. On street parking shall not be counted as required number of parking spaces as these can be removed by the City. ACKNOWLEDGED 4. Provide a notorized letter to the City's Traffic Operations Division that reads: "It is agreed that in the event that on street parking spaces are removed for any reason by the City of Clearwater, the owner will not seek compensation of any kind". 6/12/06 - MET 5. Show on driveway to Shelley Street and the intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Kilmer Avenue 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles. 6/12/06 MET 6. Remove any object that interferes with sight distance (parallel parking spaces along Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street). 6/12/06 - MET 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 6/12/06 NO RESPONSE 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 10. Additional comments may result from review of submittal of the above information. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 This is not a side setback. Revise to state "Front (South - Commercial)" NOT MET Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 06/13/2006 Page 1 of 2 • IV ' 0 FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 6/8/2006 Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise Revise site and landscape plan to include all overhead utility lines and poles.NOT MET Not Met If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscaping (grass) is Not Met proposed? PLAN STILL SHOWS NOTHING.NOT MET Show proposed outdoor lighting to be utilized for security on site plan.NOT MET Not Met 05/18/06 Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. Strike or remove this from the project narrative that is resubmitted.NOT MET Not Met Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is incorrect. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." Provide an itemized break down of $60,000 project valuation. You have exceeded the 25% Not Met improvement provision of the Parking and Landscaping code that requires compliance with all of both code sections. Per PCPA, Paul Newman the valuation of the just the buildings is $221,600. NOT MET Provide 15 sets of colored building elevations (including color swatches/cards). Also provide Not Met building dimensions to plans.NOT MET The building elevation provided appears to be labelled incorrectly. Revise or provide more Not Met accurate building elevations.NOT MET Print Date: 06/13/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 • • Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:00 AM To: 'slincoln@LACivil.com' Subject: FW: FLD2006-04022 - Gulf to Bay The following items were not addressed in your resubmittal. You will need to resubmit to Sherry Watkins before going on to the next Community Development Board (CDB) meeting on August 15th. The deadline for the next resubmittal is July 6tn John Schodtler STORMWATER The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. 6/12/06 - NOT MET - ATTENUATION NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT. NO DRAWDOWN CALCULATIONS OR INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED. TRAFFIC 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 6/12/06 NO RESPONSE 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3- 1402. 6/12/06 - NO RESPONSE 11.00 am Case Number: FLD2006-04022 -- 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Owner(s): Alan Rophie C/O Alba Consulting Corp Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Alba Consulting John Atanasio 1420 Court Street • Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-443-0718, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.964 acres locate at the southwest corner of the intersection of Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street Atlas Page: 290B Zoning District: C, Commercial ?,. Request: Flexible Development approval to allow retail sales and service use in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district; including reduction to front (north) setback to pavement i from 25 feet to 9.9 feet, reduction to front (east) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 14.9 feet, reduction to front (east) setback to entrance canopy supports from 25 feet to 17 feet, reduction to front (south) setback to pavement from 25 feet to zero feet, to allow a six foot tall fence within the front setback area, 9.94 feet from Shelly Street property line, and a reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from ?? spaces to ?? spaces (5 spaces to ?? spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area), as a Comprehensive Infll Project, per Section 2-704.C; and reduction to front (east) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 5 feet, and reduction to front (south) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P 0 Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: John Schodder, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . The following to be addressed prior to building permit: / A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the ? adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. Contact Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Prior to CO: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , Indicate how stormwater will be directed into swale with 6-inch curb between parking lot and swale, Sheet 4. ?J-=V 5 ! N& PL-Ak) - D s1o? 12aSAVIC, l1-405 Fire: No Issue's Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 1, 2006 - Page 17 r t • Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Not all landscape buffers are dimensioned on the landscape plan. Revise. 6L 3 . Indicate interior landscaped areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled on the site plan (the landscape plan is will be too busy to show these areas). tT- 4 . Provide written and photographic evidence showing hardship with regards to installing the 15 foot landscape buffer along Gulf To Bay Blvd. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Prior to CDB: The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of 041(16,% the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. Solid Waste: That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Acess to Dumpster must be from Shelly St l Traffic Engineering: I . Parallel parking spaces shall comply with current City dimensional standards (8' wide by 23' long). Community Development Code Section 3-1402 2. On street parking spaces shall not encroach into any through lanes. 3. On street parking shall not be counted as required number of parking spaces as these can be removed by the City. 4. Provide a notorized letter to the City's Traffic Operations Division that reads: "It is agreed that in the event that on street parking spaces are removed for any reason by the City of Clearwater, the owner will not seek compensation of any kind". 5. Show on driveway to Shelley Street and the intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Kilmer ?4- Avenue 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles. 6. Remove any object that interferes with sight distance (parallel parking spaces along Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street). ?,rY 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise ent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. . ?On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 10. Additional comments may result from review of submittal of the above information. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: FyG • ?O7 Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 1, 2006- Page 18 0 9 L • 1 . Provide 15 copies of formal building elevations for the subject site prior to proceeding to the Community Development Board (CDB). 2. Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise 3 . Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (2) Required parking spaces for retail sales/service are 5 parking spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of gfa, not 1.5 as referencing vehicle service in the IRT zoning. Revise and show required and proposed parking counts for both the retail sales business, enterprise rent a car business (2.5 spaces/1000 sf of lot display area), and grand totals. 4. If the proposed canopy over the front entrance on Kilmer Avenue is not affixed to the ground than it cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). If it is affixed to ground than a request for reduction to the front seback from Kilmer Avenue is required. 5 . Sheet 3 indicates 16 parallel off street parking spaces, but the plan only shows 8. - also indicates 30 total spaces, but the plan shows 28. Clarify or revise. 6. Clarify what type of fence is proposed along Shelly Street. 7. The response to General Applicability Criteria #6 is difficult to visuallize ("the proposed use wil provide architectural, visual... improvements to revitalize the property...") without the proposed building elevations. 8. The response to Comprehensive Infill criteria #1 should address the parking, setback, & landscaping reductions with regards to impracticality without deviations. 9. The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #6 ends with "are in the direction of the city LDC and its goals along the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along Gulf to Bay. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". 10. The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #7 ends with "and the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along the Gulf to Bay corridor. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". 11 . Provide documentation confirming Comprehensive Infill Criteria #8 - adequate off street parking is available to be shared with adjacent property, in addition to the proposed on street parking. 12. Provide gross floor areas for All retail, office, adult entertainment, and vehicle repair uses (and lots sales area for vehicle sales/rentals) on both properties to complete the shared parking analysis. 13. Signage indicated in the project proposal will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) approval to increase the sign area above the maximum 24 square feet. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. 14. Revise all site plans to show site visibility triangle at GTB and Kilmer 15. Revise all site plans to include existing vehicle display area(s) and customer parking spaces. 16. Revise site and landscape plan to include all overhead utility lines and poles. 17. If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscaping (grass) is proposed? PLAN SHOWS NOTHING. 18. Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. 19. On Page 3 of the Comp Landscape plan, the notary did not complete his portion of the form. Revise and resubmit for the form to be valid. 20. Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is incorrect. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." 21 . Proposal exceeds 25% of building valuation according to Paul Newman with PCPA ($221,600) taken on May 19, 2006. 22. Explain how the delivery of parts to local installers is done. The project narrative indicates 85% of Carquests business is done in this manner. Also, How many delivery vehicles will there be and where will they be parked/stored when the business is closed. 23. Provide an itemized break down of $60,000 project valuation. You have exceeded the 25% improvement provision of the Parking and Landscaping code that requires compliance with all of both code sections. Per PCPA, Paul Newman the valuation of the just the buildings is $221,600 Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 1, 2006 - Page 19 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 56211567 Fax (727) 562-4576 May 25, 2006 ALBA CONSULTING JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 RE: FLS2005-12103 LOCATED AT - 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Dear : ALBA CONSULTING JOHN ATANASIO The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-12103 . These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, June 1, 2006 Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, John Schodder, Planner II cc: File DRC Pre-DRC Comments Mail Out conditions Associated With FLD2006-04022 = yam _ 07,w 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 05/17/2006 The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Not Met A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. Contact Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Prior to CO: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Ed Chesney 562-4742 05/19/2006 Indicate how stormwater will be directed into swale with 6-inch curb between parking lot and Not Met swale, Sheet 4. Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 05/19/2006 No Issue's Not Met Landscape Curbing Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by Not Met the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Not all landscape buffers are dimensioned on the landscape plan. Revise. Not Met Indicate interior landscaped areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled on the site plan (the Not Met landscape plan is will be too busy to show these areas). Provide written and photographic evidence showing hardship with regards to installing the 15 foot Not Met landscape buffer along Gulf To Bay Blvd. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 05/12/2006 No Issues. Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 05/15/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. Dumpster Enclosure to Code Tom Glenn 562-4930 That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Acess to Dumpster must be from Shelly St Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 05/25/2006 Page 1 of 3 • FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 05/19/2006 Parallel parking spaces shall comply with current City dimensional standards (8' wide by 23' long). Not Met Community Development Code Section 3-1402 2. On street parking spaces shall not encroach into any through lanes. 3. On street parking shall not be counted as required number of parking spaces as these can be removed by the City. 4. Provide a notorized letter to the City's Traffic Operations Division that reads: "It is agreed that in the event that on street parking spaces are removed for any reason by the City of Clearwater, the owner will not seek compensation of any kind". 5. Show on driveway to Shelley Street and the intersection of Gulf, to Bay Blvd. and Kilmer Avenue 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles. 6. Remove any object that interferes with sight distance (parallel parking spaces along Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street). 7. To minimize conflict points and improve pedestrian safety, driveways in front of Enterprise Rent-a-Car shall be reduced to one in and one out at a width of 20-feet. 8. Sidewalk shall be constructed in the Gulf-to-Bay right-of-way outside of the remaining driveways. 9. On the Site Plan, show the layout and dimensions of the parking lot (drive aisles and parking spaces) on the south side of Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The layout shall comply with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 10. Additional comments may result from review of submittal of the above information. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 05/05/2006 Provide 15 copies of formal building elevations for the subject site prior to proceeding to the Not Met Community Development Board (CDB). Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback Not Met requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (2) Required parking spaces for Not Met retail sales/service are 5 parking spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of gfa, not 1.5 as referencing vehicle service in the IRT zoning. Revise and show required and proposed parking counts for both the retail sales business, enterprise rent a car business (2.5 spaces/1000 sf of lot display area), and grand totals. If the proposed canopy over the front entrance on Kilmer Avenue is not affixed to the ground than Not Met it cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). If it is affixed to ground than a request for reduction to the front seback from Kilmer Avenue is required. Sheet 3 indicates 16 parallel off street parking spaces, but the plan only shows 8. - also indicates Not Met 30 total spaces, but the plan shows 28. Clarify or revise. Clarify what type of fence is proposed along Shelly Street. Not Met The response to General Applicability Criteria #6 is difficult to visuallize ("the proposed use wil Not Met Print Date: 05/25/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD • Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 provide architectural, visual... improvements to revitalize the property...") without the proposed building elevations. The response to Comprehensive Infill criteria #1 should address the parking, setback, & Not Met landscaping reductions with regards to impracticality without deviations. The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #6 ends with "are in the direction of the city LDC Not Met and its goals along the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along Gulf to Bay. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #7 ends with "and the Gulf to Bay corridor". This Not Met proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along the Gulf to Bay corridor. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". Provide documentation confirming Comprehensive Infill Criteria #8 - adequate off street parking is Not Met available to be shared with adjacent property, in addition to the proposed on street parking. Provide gross floor areas for All retail, office, adult entertainment, and vehicle repair uses (and lots Not Met sales area for vehicle sales/rentals) on both properties to complete the shared parking analysis. Signage indicated in the project proposal will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program Not Met (CSP) approval to increase the sign area above the maximum 24 square feet. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. Revise all site plans to show site visibility triangle at GTB and Kilmer Not Met Revise all site plans to include existing vehicle display area(s) and customer parking spaces. Not Met Revise site and landscape plan to include all overhead utility lines and poles. Not Met If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscaping (grass) is Not Met proposed? PLAN SHOWS NOTHING. Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. Not Met On Page 3 of the Comp Landscape plan, the notary did not complete his portion of the form. Not Met Revise and resubmit for the form to be valid. Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is Not Met incorrect. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." Proposal exceeds 25% of building valuation according to Paul Newman with PCPA ($221,600) Not Met taken on May 19, 2006. Explain how the delivery of parts to local installers is done. The project narrative indicates 85% of Not Met Carquests business is done in this manner. Also, How many delivery vehicles will there be and where will they be parked/stored when the business is closed. 05/24/2006 Provide an itemized break down of $60,000 project valuation. You have exceeded the 25% Not Met improvement provision of the Parking and Landscaping code that requires compliance with all of both code sections. Per PCPA, Paul Newman the valuation of the just the buildings is $221,600 Print Date: 05/25/2006 CaseConditons Page 3of3 r • May. 25 2006 04:17PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94472369 May.25 04:15PM 01'57 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 1 t • May. 25 2006 04:20PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469050 May.25 04:18PM 01'50 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. % r 't JV'5 .Clearwater Fax Cover Sheet 11 r-? u City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4865 To: Alba Consulting John Atanasio Fax: 44- q - 2 5CU n Case FLD2006-04022 - 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Alan Ro hie From: Sherry Watkins, Planning Department Date: May 30, 2006 Subject: DRC Meeting Thursday, June 1-2006 Message: YOUR DRC -DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING IS AT 11:00 AM @ 100 S MYRTLE AVE ROOM 216. PLEASE CONTRACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS @ 727-562-4582. THANK YOU 0 0 May. 30 2006 11:38AM • NO. OTHER FACSIMILE 01 94472369 YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT May.30 11:38AM 00'37 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MB*QJ' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). ?J 0 Clearwater U May 05, 2006 Alba Consulting 1420 Court Street Clearwater, Fl 33756 OCITY OF CLEIRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MYCLEARWATER. C OM RE: FLD2006-04022 -- 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Alba Consulting : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-04022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 01, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-04022 - 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD May. 05 2006 10:22AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469050 May.05 10:21AM 00'47 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). ORIGINA • "I AY () 4 2 0 0 6 LINCOLN ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. I F l l G 4,1:d'ARIMEW 1446 Court Street eNTV ?r I.EARI?,fI?T Clearwater, Florida 33756 Ph (727) 446-9000 / Fax (727) 446-9050 May 4, 2006 John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Letter of Incompleteness FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodtler: On behalf of the applicant, Alba Consulting Corporation, LA Civil is submitting a response to the following "Incompleteness" comments received from you in your letter dated 05/01/06. We have attached 15 copies of the signed Affidavit to Authorize Agent form as requested along with "preferred building elevations" in the form of color photos of (2) existing Car Quest facilities and Typical Building Elevations. 6A AI(A? Please understand that ALBA Consulting Corporation is the Agent and Landlord for the owner. ALBA is assisting the owner with the petition and leasing the subject building. Car Quest, who is the potential tenant, will not prepare formal elevation drawings for the subject building until ALBA secures Site Plan approval to demonstrate "approval" of any proposed use. Hence, until the Site Plan is approved, further expenditure of consulting and design fees for architectural plans appears cost prohibitive to all parties. Therefore, we request that the attachments herein be accepted to deem the application complete to move forward to review of the project before the DRC on June 1, 2006 and the City of Clearwater CDB on July 18, 2006. If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call. LA Scott Lincoln\PE President ff CC: John Atanasio, Alba Consulting 0 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVI:NUI,, CLEARWATER, FLOMA 33756 TELFPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DFVELOPMENT REVIEW May 5, 2006 Alba Consulting Corp., Inc. Mr. John Atanasio 1420 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: 2430 Gulf To Bay Boulevard - FLD2006-04022 - Car Quest Auto Parts Dear Mr. Atanasio: We are in receipt of your responses to the Letter of Incompleteness dated May 4, 2006. Apparently we have been unclear about the fact that your application for approval to operate a retail sales/service establishment will require professionally drawn building elevations depicting the way the building will look in order to obtain an approval. The photographs and drawings provided at time of completeness to demonstrate how similar stores look are not acceptable to complete the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment review process. Without site specific building elevations your application will not proceed past the Development Review Committee. We suggest that you and your tenant discuss this matter, as failure to provide required materials will delay possible approvals. Please contact John Schodtler, Planner II (727-562-4547 or john.schodtler@myclearwater.com) if you need further assistance. Sincerely, Neil Thompson Development Review Manager ) 'V1r1YOl S:\Planning Departmenj?l?ll? (i) A\?'? ding cases\Up 1'ItforANKtheHnextIEIiAItIDRC`Gulf "I'o Bay B??d MOC??nQ?ue)UN C 06-0;-06 (JVS)\Building Elevation Requirement.doc MENI H(>YI' HAIMIUMN, COUNCILMEMnEE ® CARLEN A. 1 E'I1TRSEN, COUNCILMINMIT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMKHvi--. ACTION EIMPLOYER' 0 May. 05 2006 10:21AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94472369 May.05 10:19AM 01'15 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-1-P-FAX (435-7329). ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 MAY 0 4 2006 LINCOLN ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1446 Court Street CITY OF CLEARWATER Clearwater, Florida 33756 Ph (727) 446-9000 / Fax (727) 446-9050 May 4, 2006 John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Letter of Incompleteness FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodtler: On behalf of the applicant, Alba Consulting Corporation, LA Civil is submitting a response to the following "Incompleteness" comments received from you in your letter dated 05/01/06. We have attached 15 copies of the signed Affidavit to Authorize Agent form as requested along with "preferred building elevations" in the form of color photos of (2) existing Car Quest facilities and Typical Building Elevations. Please understand that ALBA Consulting Corporation is the Agent and Landlord for the owner. ALBA is assisting the owner with the petition and leasing the subject building. Car Quest, who is the potential tenant, will not prepare formal elevation drawings for the subject building until ALBA secures Site Plan approval to demonstrate "approval" of any proposed use. Hence, until the Site Plan is approved, further expenditure of consulting and design fees for architectural plans appears cost prohibitive to all parties. Therefore, we request that the attachments herein be accepted to deem the application complete to move forward to review of the project before the DRC on June 1, 2006 and the City of Clearwater CDB on July 18, 2006. If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call. Sin LA Scott LincoMPE CC: John Atanasio, Alba Consulting President Scott, Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:44 PM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Scott: Resubmit 15 copies of all the revisions. Thanks, John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:57 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John: This appears a little clearer as a PDF. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:08 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Try this. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@lacivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:14 PM To: craig.flournoy@gpi.com Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Craig: Please also try to send me some architectural Elevations of a Building you have constructed lately. This is really what the City wants. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln 5/4/2006 Scott, Page 2 of 2 Subject: CARQUEST Pictures John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig Flournoy Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 352-291-4140 Fax 5/4/2006 • • Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:41 PM To:- - - 'Scott Lincoln' Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Scott: These building elevation drawings (PDF's) will work for completeness. But we will be asking for more specifics with regards to the subject site in particular. John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:57 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John: This appears a little clearer as a PDF. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crFlourn@gpi.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:08 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Try this. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@lacivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:14 PM To: craig.flournoy@gpi.com Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Craig: Please also try to send me some architectural Elevations of a Building you have constructed lately. This is really what the City wants. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crFlourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: CARQUEST Pictures 5/4/2006 • • Page 2 of 2 John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig Flournoy Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 352-291-4140 Fax 5/4/2006 I* i 0 Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:38 PM To:--- 'Scott Lincoln' - Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Scott: Sorry for the delay. Today was this month's Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting. Building elevations are a requirement to be considered complete for this application process. As far as the building elevations being formal is of little consequence with regards to this completeness review. There is still time to submit conceptual elevation by Monday to keep this project moving forward (but be prepared, whatever you submit will go through a full review for compliance through the DRC). The firming up and finalization of the building elevations will need to be done prior to going to the CDB. John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:29 PM To: Schodtler, John . Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John: This typical elevation is similar to what Car Quest expects to do. However, they do not Plan to initiate formal elevations until they are affirmed the Site Plan is approved by the City. You need to understand their position. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:07 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Try this. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@lacivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:14 PM To: craig.flournoy@gpi.com Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Craig: Please also try to send me some architectural Elevations of a Building you have constructed lately. This is really what the City wants. Scott 5/4/2006 0 Page 2 of 2 10 ite` -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: CARQUEST Pictures John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig Flournoy Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 352-291-4140 Fax 5/4/2006 ? • Pagel of 2 Schodtler, John From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:56 AM To: Schodtler, John Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures I will speak with Mr. Atanasio. But yes, we need until Monday to get this resolved. Scott -----Original Message----- From: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com [mailto:John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 7:54 AM To: Scott Lincoln Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Scott Lincoln: The site plan you have submitted shows a new covered entry way and along with the comments made at our last meeting that the building facades were going to be changed to look more like retail store fronts. These items all need to be considered in the request. This is in my opinion a great way to show how the property is going to be improved from its existing state. If the building ends up looking like one of the photographs submitted this could be a positive aspect of this application. I can give you until Monday, May 8th at 4pm to get the elevations in to me to make completeness. John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:42 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John Schodtler: We received your letter regarding incompleteness of our car Quest submittal. We are getting the Owners Affidavit Signed. Also, with the attached photos serve as an example of the Car Quest Building Elevations being planned??? We do not have architectural elevations yet, as Car Quest is not going to produce them until the use can be approved. Please confirm or deny, as the 5/5 deadline is looming like impending doom. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: CARQUEST Pictures 5/4/2006 0 -1 ' • Page 2 of 2 John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig Flournoy Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 352-291-4140 Fax 5/4/2006 • • Page 1 of 1 t Schodtler, John From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:57 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John: This appears a little clearer as a PDF. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:08 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Try this. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@lacivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:14 PM To: craig.flournoy@gpi.com Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Craig: Please also try to send me some architectural Elevations of a Building you have constructed lately. This is really what the City wants. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: CARQUEST Pictures John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig Flournoy . Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 352-291-4140 Fax 5/4/2006 T - - ..., -----r------------- - I 6Lewu00D OBwwm uBOOI•m0. Lro. IB n:t DD.IDp,,,.LD.Bb,.LaD?Ir.Dr..wD.?DaI o ------------- ------------------- - -------- -------------- --- ------ !? ' wuw accwn . ?DD.? .awI,FD TO D?r.,u s`n?`le eu mnr roc .Brain Iw B IB a AvmrTVM DweW V wswm Cv I - I -I-- _.__ _ _.. __ _. ' -- -- --- I w'-m• ?Iml• roe °`ulO", roar" D•amLBL1 ri+ralE,.uta c.im.l• n.v ».v. ro w Bo ro ConR,• miN LODLL void - _. ??• d - ? l ':=1 - - { ' I ? D?Iww,DUce«`.,IB,`°".I'?DUm.,ww ?PVO•v ow,IBI:.Dw w.VIFY .rm ..?n.m?aa..,IDw .loe.. enr w.ace--, ; - n _. vr.IF.llme. - - - a W ?- ?? ;; ? a II I r?,IrrBlw Da DDrT,?DBIw wDac I , L• II I I L_ ?_ I _._7-_..r-?-E_T_.- I_l II M)f111 eaw ae• r??n.?.vl? II I I - II ? _.__ 11 A V I I II __ ii I I i i u?a.Da awocaae ? I B ii _ d t I e L I I J - I -L L-1 I - . I I e I I ---------------------- -- n FLOOR TILH PATTQRN DETAIL _ - AT STANDARD PROTOTYPE ENTRY -- 05 ecau, v B LAR6ED - TOILET PLAN 04 -- FI?(TURE PLAN 11 1_ V V room finish schedule __-_ - -r D• ?a IS ROOM NAP IS seBB -- - - -a• ? - ® ______ ____ __ ______ ____________________ - •r r-o' r + 4 `°`°` paint color selections 11 A ean] ------------------- Lin] _ r? door schedule > .--A n oa > n n W-P-1 ma - .' ----- i o' ? oB D'-mXr•-m'M D/a• -2 t DY-I B RN9 . BY.mma B eo oB - --_--- D'-mXt'-O'n »a' rtr-r - CWI aB6•Y - BuMOms G .. .?w...•w.. r,w.wae.?. . ?H.....,?.... . r ?w r........ ?wr..m.,. .r '? I L1 1 51 I.7 T I D? M.( uv ?1®CEIl ??? ? §. n m o n6-s Brw . w . . . . e...o.?a..nwae . em wciic+ru u?i v.?urd ro- nwrrw F.a, .ewanwwn[cr urw F•cw?w??wao?rww. I a•-r . B'. «oBa rw t0'-0' _ Dr-0' _ J I wa,Fe.. r,,,s,..n ____ pa,•'o ww?.•..?ao ---__-_-.____..___.-.__-._-.-__.__ ? \./ Ala eo'wrii? I j DOOR SDHROULK / ROOM FINISH BOHODULE O / FLOOR PLA 01 Z¢ U- E- a a 00. F rn O vi W E-- i d oa E; E-F m a ? a W ? OQi U` U I 961 Ls..: 3.H.0L - APE- __?F[1 N0. A-1 m 4_- ?T ur er.in tl!!eT ILDP1a: KR.M1. P.uli6 ? ?Mim il0 M? \__-{' VMrI m•A rtP aY mb. TT >T -? 1 ?L oa•.x® w.u auwucee war ,Wai?earoee wau L a lCCOCDIN.n anew P%Me bdRlaa) ! W nslNe ?IITLIN INTERIOR HLfivATION 10 INTERIOR ELEVATION OlA d ?? e• wrouL W! NMTi K:cen '? Pum :.? . .ew.: ----------------- ---------- --------------- me I ?? eeawre en.c. `ec?..ecu-- ? w.x?o Me+Lw .. i ' alma 1 I I aw? eE? WITK GROSS SECTION ?---- „'.'.°.TI ? er arou TPaT ul •Tm Kwanvvs ?eiro°T ?aMa.e amar.a.T en{ ?-„- __ ?04 eua e• k-IB OR•elwwvaga PR T, ELEV ?TION INTERIOR ELEVATION -- -- 08 Wua, w•?m. V ?• m,,.. NuL-a iaru 06? •apm . G I]' dOONT •TNIq - OMV®T P® ?1 - • GCf1V i eRIH . URGLVei IX1A a 9 ___ - WIeDRH aa1dYl. ICiI-l?_ L T Cell `- CPO.I 1 R 0:001 -. - - - m!l Tin •T LV•Oem wLLL eIT•Cte CNLT we uur reloM nam r Tw euPalw?-___ -° j a a G, INTERIOR aLSVATION 0 / Se rea, 1 o a a ----- - --- - - ------ - -- a Q R aR ci k A: s wa 0 U) LONGITUDINAL OfiGTION -1 E" U °- a -- -- -- -- U K - rrr^^ N O N Pw ow cn Z pArar• O E Q [1. M: 0 on m 0 dmu ... eTm nur.Me eealn.e Te esPn.T m Z nwo ?a..?n..m ew•wr ws •? ? GAR iLivATION 1 03 -. 05 ~ Z X00. G •D ? WMOCW Pm,y.°rceon 9611401 JTO PARTS Ea ?. a.oz u? nr- z KO IIT. ,f p @ - - T, . RENSIMS .c?IEEi u/0 SIDE ELEVATION ?_/? ` - -- - Ty SIDE HLEVATION--_----- F?l 9 O +- _?pT _?- #I. 9I !=V ? l41L. fib' a1.lM !I 1' f, TUC tWFtp EURb, aX))A aM!°.a TYPICAL PIXTURE AND ACCMSSORY log MOUNtING MLEVATIONS _ -- -- _ - -- Dpyya.Inw mLL, eLDb CoIm.DNC«t.6 Rda m rRn ___ _- -_ wluruw cur . es.'o acNae o care. wD. wrMa rD vl- ?'?. salt. nn ton e ae*?ae ?? .ua..i eMCnor.l oe. ..____ wrra'I"`TUC. ? ?r -- In emn. ar. nwD I - - --HLG WOIRK COL'NTOR6?Li 08 HMADCR WWALLOVERASALHS GOUNTi 07 rioa. D . I.. "fll.r? e J air+uu+?i, o`rw.?.la w :ca.'civ:ia, .eeulu ea•I.uwc. wlrN ?DC.? er.n. ?•. ... arNA aRTJfAe4 f4gp • P90'OiTA DtNGN DAem aV VITIAIe qR RLL.I°«, vDRr« DAR0.INL "-'- OE'IIVC[DaGM1PItAIi T N. o D.°aLLWr IID Cal TGa e«sl.LU YlbYlr f4JerleUGl ePRIPA IOR ME ITlIbH a0 GPTINDNIO WOlbc. -.1-LIN. •ac. A R.ID roeT Inq PT °ni+?n°D?o. w ewPOl.r d• aeevrlruaw .,,?.D.rDa? nn Dom. ns%? _MZ.P.R4F?. necl N"O?` elm uL seN a W.LL Ion "a -- -- _, .-IR. Ls. ..e,:R ermuD?l6 oc. 'D• aPr ___ ` n• ela°ul). )%s s+na v n _ _ eruDe . s• oc. m . save !Ra: ur>m 'Ea °-m?4 w%rnelol. °TUV TrIeL .I.Dn r+a-? - z elver uu??u wao?l.m _ _ &MOTION THQU SECTION THROUGH MMCHANIGAL PLATP TYPICAL SECTION THROUG? WORK GOUNTGR 06 OVER SERVICE AREA 1O7A O5 MMHRIDR SOFFIT O4 glazing schedule Q r.°•%•'.e•%r Data pus Q I'.e' %>' ID' %I' y0uub ?ru 1. Q eena .avf i_I r e y'R 4 L ? ? C ? Iva uv. v ? o I /-aoD. wauw ILL C a ? g w j ? ? l Z i O I U cn aE- o p G -al°ID .od•v cl) WE- O Y ? N o a e,ls.'oAC ., U o H b c? _ ?. 2 LL all o (? O wU z PARTIAL.?DLWASMGTIGN AT 103 I PARGH MANE O01 LA 102 771 2-11, r-l ?J G., I 0 11 G) : G LO LE r? r+ Imal VIM OE-78 DOOR AND PRAMS ELMVATIONS ou?M. lu .I m -A REA rwrN rN rn+rcnawr H6 -I f 1 ivanu: ?-as_ FX -DO Y.- uxc xxr: FHK EN50%)CH srtcr o. 01 ?_ 3- alternate glazing sched ule ! ?° coven nw ALTERNATE FRAME ELHVATION FOR BIDE ENTRY W'SLYb'.LOlY! BRaILClIi0 C7 C? m« Cw??a t13Yi_i.LiQ Cw7 ALTERNATE FIXTURi PLAN WITH PAINT BALKS _0mnLt' V -_ cwll n MRGGF t?J WIPUR". use eaa. 10 09 PLOOTOORNHR KNtRY TAIL 1071 FL AT O@J ,HR SIDEm ENTRY DETAIL AT 05 w• . I m RATTIERN = ALTERNATE PLOOR PLAN=ITM MACNINH SHOP 1 AFLOOR TILE -? 04 ALTERNATE FLOOR PLAN A_^ -- I ni( STANDARD PROTOT YPK AKNTRY 0? FLOOR ATI LSIDE ENTI!Y DETAIL. ? I Fvs!? ae?w ecrn , 1-0 v ?8 ALTERNATE FLOOR PLAN .-? GORNER ENTRY 03 C ' C ? Q C oO i L C-J z O ---------- ) ALTERNATE FLOOR PLAN ( E- 102 5 ¢ co ENTRY L ?.1 E- ?f0GG 0 F ZI.oC; 0 m E-, U od0. o E- -L? O a U] 0 n W m G ,-) (i (Do N O OXC C zU J? 96114'.01 !$$UL J2.9.02. c -ar: s m or"-a _ HFh9 5 ? SIDK BNTRY T -.!_- ?01? -? 4 0 r _ -, • Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:29 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John: This typical elevation is similar to what Car Quest expects to do. However, they do not Plan to initiate formal elevations until they are affirmed the Site Plan is approved by the City. You need to understand their position. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:07 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Try this. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@lacivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:14 PM To: craig.flournoy@gpi.com Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Craig: Please also try to send me some architectural Elevations of a Building you have constructed lately. This is really what the City wants. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: CARQUEST Pictures John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig Flournoy Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 352-291-4140 Fax 5/4/2006 • \® ?JI KaiN ?Yw'M ?*tY a•. ' m_<a j fV?SQ 9R SAS K-d4 0 0 ?? 4w#M'.saaL!+l??Y?+#.w<.?.•yr.. Vbn,F eY1.Yl.6r?P.AV ir< ? . f fL%ti.. ?M`as v ? ,.4 Yew. ?. ?.s 1+'OYfWI(-N- ?..n V wan. z. w aa. < ?.I h ?.: i pg 08 Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 3:19 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Car Quest John: These are the (2) general elevations that Car Quest prefers at this location. Is this enough along with the elevation I sent you to proceed as complete? We may have more by DRC but I cannot promise. Scott 5/4/2006 TYPICAL CARQUEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS, SIGNAGE AND IMAGE r +? 4 • ;V % 0 „Schodtler, John From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:14 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: CarQuest f VA? img-5031618-0001. pdf John: Attached is the affidavit to authorize agent. Let me know if I need to formally submit 15 copies along with the building elevations I sent you. Scott -----Original Message----- from: ScanCa?tACivihcom jmailto:Scan(c?LACivilcoml Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:18 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: please open attachement 0:)/0Z/G100b 13: 94 WHtN UULL5 I t 1 N rUK I lIU I I L 1 LZ -2 (e r Nv r CJO7 Nu. 71j7 Levi-) Matf we US U:?I:'Uba Alba Consulting Corp. (727)4.47-2369 P.2 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: t. Ps'avieo na<?cs of oil property owners on decd - PRINT full names: Alan A. Rophie Ralph A. Rophie Cecilia geteeh ^- - .Cheryl R. Cohen ')tat (I amiwo ara) the owner{s).end rOCrNd titlo holder(s) or the fopowiry doscriboa property (address or general location): 243.0 Cult-To-Bay Boulevard, C3earwater. F1orlae I Thal this 0I'oparty cnnsUtutes the property rw which ,request for ar {(Jescrioe reauesl) .?? _i4.P1?IicatioTt_-• ?LD_ 200604022_^_____-- -------• ? .. .-..._...- d. That the Lmiarsignrq (haarhave) zppvinttdand.(0oettgo) appolnL - --.-"? -Alba Consulting Corp./,john Atanasio _..._...... ...... es (I k;A"e)r) .grinds) to nxecut6• any pe-litiont; or other documents necaca,,ty to a¢tca such pctilion; S. Thar, this aMdrwi( h1; M+vn exelwied to induce the City of CteBrwater. Florida to conS)def and Dcl on the aCOvo deselte9C, perry. q• That ."c vigil; to the property arc necessary by City r+eprosenratlvos in order to p.-ocoos mis application and tho owner oirthoriXds City thprt:SenlnliV"S I6 vi ;ir af-d pnoto;inph the propety described in this application; 7. That (lAve), the 1In01)2•idnod outhori`tY, hereby certify trial the torfigoing jr true an0 co-rect. Pr.porty Owmer PrvPcrry py, r _ " Proponyowner - STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 3efore the the undG•r ,.igncd, an of5cor duly commiegionAd by ma laws Of tha State of Florida, on this 2nd _ 6;ry of May 2006 P.1r5onel)y appeared Cheryl R. Cohen _ who having been first nuly sworn Dnposm antt says 91;x1 hclgho fury Undem(ands the contents of the affidavit that hoishe stand. o Notify Public It HoW ry , IV Nol3ry 9n:?IISI?mp My Commission F.xplro9: ? T • --.?? _ raalA•. ?iF-•- S ?PrPn^^?? ooF?t;n2?i J?pple;oYa.? Formetooveb(knent mKow200tl fonrslComrorwn9lvJ Infer r1nbtwt (FL13)7003.doo Page 8 otil GEORGIA SEPT., aa„2M A Otte c.OVttt, 0 0 Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 7:54 AM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: RE: CARQUEST Pictures Scott Lincoln: The site plan you have submitted shows a new covered entry way and along with the comments made at our last meeting that the building fagades were going to be changed to look more like retail store fronts. These items all need to be considered in the request. This is in my opinion a great way to show how the property is going to be improved from its existing state. If the building ends up looking like one of the photographs submitted this could be a positive aspect of this application. I can give you until Monday, May 8th at 4pm to get the elevations in to me to make completeness. John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:42 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: alba.consulting@verizon.net Subject: FW: CARQUEST Pictures John Schodtler: We received your letter regarding incompleteness of our car Quest submittal. We are getting the Owners Affidavit Signed. Also, with the attached photos serve as an example of the Car Quest Building Elevations being planned??? We do not have architectural elevations yet, as Car Quest is not going to produce them until the use can be approved. Please confirm or deny, as the 5/5 deadline is looming like impending doom. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Craig Flournoy [mailto:crflourn@gpi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:17 AM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: CARQUEST Pictures John A. asked me to e-mail these to you. Please let me know if this is OK. Thanks, Craig. Craig F ournoy Operations Manager Georgia/Florida CARQUEST Auto Parts Ocala, Fl. 352-291-4133 Office 5/3/2006 Cle"arwater U May 01, 2006 Alba Consulting 1420 Court Street Clearwater, F133756 *CITY OF CLETRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM RE: FLD2006-04022 -- 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Alba Consulting : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-04022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. The property owners needs to record that the landlord is authorized to act as agent. 2. Provide 1 color copy and 14 black & white copies of the proposed building elevations. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Friday, May 5, 2006 (12:00 noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, QP?- ?? Jo Schodtler Planner II Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-04022 - 2430 GULF TO BAYBLVD Tra*mission Report Date/Time Local ID Local Name Company Logo This document was confirmed. (reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter-S °a ter CITY OF CLEARWATER >A 'n" PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. ,..._ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING l00 SOUTH MYRTLE AVFNM, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER-COM May 01.2006 Alba Consulting 1420 Court Street Clearwater, F133756 RE: FLD2OD6.04022 - 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Alba Consulting: The Planning Staffhas adored your appliea6en into the Departments filing system and assigned the wsemunber.FLD2006-04022. After aptelmilaWreview ofthesubmitted doeumeata,etaffhas determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. The property owners needs to record that the landlord is authorized to act as agent 2. Provide 1 cola copy and 14 black & white copies of the proposed building elevations. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code stasis that if an application is deemed inamplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff: No further development review notice almll be taker, until the deficiencies we corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Friday, May 5, 2006 (12:00 noon). If you have arty questions, please do not hesitate to canted me at 727-5624547 or John.SchodOer@rayclue watetoom. Sincerely yours, J SeoSn hooddderr Planner B uryr?.m?,mr.eo,?-ruua mv- joa ousr m mrmFD Total Pages Scanned - 1 Total Pages Confirmed 1 5- 1-06; 2:01PM 7275624796 No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 180 94469050 5- 1-06; 2:OOPM 37° 1/ 1 EC CP 14.4 Notes . EC: Error Correct BC: Broadcast Send CP: Completed HS: Host Scan F: RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc MB: Receive to Mailbox PI: Power Interruption TM: Terminated by user WT: Waiting Transfer WS: Waiting Send Traw- mission Report Date/TIme Local ID Local Name Company Logo This document was confirmed. (reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter-S .J?^ o CITY OF CLEARWATER ,. 19rwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 sourHMYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 5624567 PAX: (727) 562.4576 W W W.MYCLFARWATERCOM May 01, 2006 Alba Consulting 1420 Court Stmt Clearwater, F133756 RE: FLD2006-04022 - 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD - Letter of Facompleteneas Dear Alba Consulting: The Plsaning Smil'haa -red your application into the Dapartm- Kling system and assigned the can number: PLJY2006-04022 After a pmhminmy wncw of the aabmittod daosmenta, staffluu determined that the application is coin lete with the following comments. 1. Campkte the Affidavit to Authorize Agent Tho property owners needs to recordthat the landlord is submized to ad as agent. 2 Provide 1 color copy and 14 black A; wbite copies of the proposed building clevationa Sectim 4-202 ofihe Comreunity D-lWmwt Code states that if au application is deemed incomplete, the def cimcles ofthm application stall be specified by Staff. No furtha dovelspmaot review action shall be tAm until the deficiaieies am corrected and the application is deemed o®plow, Please resubmtt by IMlday, May 5, 2006 (12:00 noon} if ymm have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 of JohaScboddcr@mychsrwater coin S ii }(n / /cc a?'r . lo' 1. y?yours, ' , .l, .r ? Planner E --f-ph- Frnvw wv-uJow Wmyecrn Total Pages Scanned 1 Total Pages Confirmed 1 p9 s 5- 1-06; 1:59PM 7275624796 No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 177 94472369 5- 1-06; 1:58PM 38" 1/ 1 EC CP 14-4 Notes . EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output HP: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc MB: Receive to Mailbox PI: Power Interruption TM: Terminated by user WT: Waiting Transfer WS: Waiting Send FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard OS-18-2006 idiom Residential Property to the north east of the subject property. Retail sales with accessory vehicle service to the east of the subject property. Residential Property to the north. Y .y.?[ -map Subject property - 2430 Gulf to Bay from the corner of Kilmer Ave and Shelley Street. This is the view of the building from the residential properties to the north. 0000 ?' ?pKEY'? Subject property -vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the site. Note: lack of landscaping and non- conforming setbacks to pavement. Soo rant .I C'Ir Subject property -Vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the subject site. Applicant has requested a waiver from redeveloping this portion of the site due to lease conflicts. MOAN Subject property -view of the north west elevations. This is the view from the residential properties to the north. _40 4t- : a"- ? , .A a -+K 4.- i:•. 1• 4 ..rte -- kt .`?,.;a? +? '°- w? ?L-??? •k.. ?:° ? - ??,?:? -r.: i `? ?i. _ . - ? dam' - c. _ _ ??: ?+•?_???•.` - _- 'try '?' ' ?• y a"f ????, .., - - ?.?i: . -... ?' yy i A?l - IV, 4 r Q low ?- -PEI! . . . . . . . . . . . . . AAL ¦ gyn.'" ,? =_ ? : ? ,® __ ..: ?? -- - _ ?, .. __ .. ., ?:?. °; ?:: _. -?..r,.?-'t •.r _ s'?? _. ?,. _s BW-bdfh1.- .s _ ?,,,,,,,,._ t - J"" '? _ ? ..sue - "`?+,? .?- -21?."ti .. .. ? ?? ?. i a ?r.r I so0 f@flt -a- ar L FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard 05-18-2006 Residential Property to the north east of the subject property. 4. 4;- J a Retail sales with accesson vehicle sen ice to the east of the subject propert3-. Residential Propert} to the north. 1 Subject property- - 2430 Gulf to Bay from the corner of Kilmer Ave and Sheller Street. This is the view of the building from the residential properties to the north. t-: 1 t Subject property - Vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the subject site. Applicant has requested a A air er from redeveloping this portion of the site due to lease conflicts. woo Subject property - N chicle sales located on the southern portion of the site. Note: lack of landscaping and non- conforming setbacks to pavement. Subject property - view of the north N est eleN at ions. This is the N iciN from the residential properties to the north. 2 • • ilk Sen ice to the i est. This is the vieNi from the residential properties to the north. Residential property to the north. West side of Vehicle sen ice building to the Nest of subject property. Office building to the south, across Gulf to Bay Blvd. rte- ??I Mobile Home Park to the south east of the subject propertA - across Gulf to BaN Bled. I(I'N FU Retail Sales & an Adult use located to the,vAest of the subject property • Overnight Accomodations to the south nest of the subject property - across Gulf to Bay Blvd. 4 • N? P MARILYN Sf y (? SNMICEY RD ANNA XE a? ?a6 A < ^ ,. A LORFNA LA 'U7 TERRACES OR N ?j DO DOR A C R 528 NORMA N . . a GREW ST a 6` g O 1 a s Cenbtitlge G. S'. EAS'M1?OOD DR PROJECT NAS„ ST a SITE ST WHITMAN WN DMAN ST Q ? Ck yI O CHAUCER ST 5 CNMI -----? SHELLEY ST LL a S.R. SO g GULF TO BAY BLVD S.R. 80 VR O O m ? DRUID RD .UEFA PL o BASCOM WAY F B sEV?? a.vD R& DR ? W 5 MERSOY? OR S GROVEWOOD RO 0 3 F. RE) MN?&OLA 3 V EARCE OR SLICE OR ^ DR GLE??Nr100R``?? ;G.LEW;ADORfl pFNM00RU / 1 a lR ?y I KKR GIENMOOR RD S U @ SEo I? TRWIC NRlb DR y? SSS ? ? a? D a ? DORADO PL MARN ¢ p IAI"EW RD NABERSHAM Location Map Owner. Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2006-04022 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property Size(Acres): 0.964 Car Quest PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) Vending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\location.doc • • V171 AN 17* A/ , 1 11 fr J ? a? s 'x` =1 s ? r.., • y it _ ;b a io- ?, ry c .. ., 1W let,, - <.s ?.. Us W- .1 _ J , Aerial Map Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2006-04022 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.964 Size(Acres) : Car Quest PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Guff To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\oerial.doc • • i f 115 WHITMAN ST ' co 211T_1, - , 1 I ?r IF _I I r ?? ut o - 4 f-, I r 2{k l " r, 204 V3 i,-I L I I L B t--- t_ I 1 1 j I - `L- 421 z'e -1 i ;208 ; 2W 1-112 W I -I r_, Q L__l 1 y121 Iii I Q LJ 1_I or l cyo?l _r-1216 Q. 211 i__ 1-1 ?I ?4 L 1 r ' I-. ' t 1 -?r ' L i -- j r r--; 1 3Qf'-I -- 19 LU 2f7_1, , '-, r t r-121 CHAUCER ST I U I I I 1I 1 F $ I N, 1 ?-?, - N I I a 1 I `Lc Q j 1 I - I_r . _ i_? L I 1 III rl i I L I i--" I L? ` I_ r ti_ I O 311) I ?_I I I J' 41 --! `-- Single Fa ?D mily Residential r__ 3tY---, --1 O I--, % I o I __I ? r? L v ` ? I 1 , I I ! L-' I ml I ml nl of I_ I 1 I _ ? c y ?? N ? L_l -= N U Ar' ?aj 3r0 w 1 310 LL I L_--- - 4D1--- 1 _ SHELLEY ST , Vehicle Service Retail & ; --- ; --- accessory C==; Vehicle I ' F I 2 Service L LRetail L--------- I 1' Q 416 I---- - G 0-BAY BLVD GULF-TO-BAY BLVD - ; F Mohile Home Park ' Mohile Home Park 1 N N I , r- N; , l ,r, va rr w office r + r--, 1 5TH ST 1 ? =; 1 1 Overnight Accomodation _ " E _ -1 _ Ut?i n I_? I 1 t_ f a ?L-- w 515 I-t t- I___l V 7 !7 ?? ?? ? fJ 1r i I ( 1 1 ? ? I TJ'I_ r 1 r"" r { ` L _J __ t 1 j I _L_ _J ? (dal ?r -- , __, Existing Use Map Owner. Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2006-04022 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.964 Size(Acres): PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Car Quest Atlas Page: T 2906 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\proposed.doc • E 1 -? - jff8 115 r-8 N N -- ? r WHITMAN ST 4 }I 2 11?_I i I 21x1 .= - DO 201 t L204 I L 208 1 I I-t- 1 --- L_ t__L ' 1 '--I J' LJ' L I 1 T r? ? L_J L,_j I I 'I C - `?- 21 219 _1 I, ,1208 j 2MV1 1- 41 ; -? 1 I ! __I 7 L?J L 1_ Q --' F ?'21i? I 1 I 1218 _- LJ Q Qi 211 i--ql N? '-- r-- i 2 I ' L - '--J ?l d 2f 1 - '-- - W CHAUCER ST I 1 ' 1 r 1, L'- W 1 1_-_1 -1 3M 3f -I I I_ -1 1 L N ;tkv I I N 1 1 L, 1 -9,1 1-'-? 1 1- I I I I I- ' •! ` J _ 1 1 I I I I L-J ?,__ r l I I_ I L_ 1 I J I L J 1 r- LJ r' I 1 I 1 1 303- I I i-? ___ __ - - 1__ZI L_I I --?1 311 1_-- I ?_I 5 _ 1 I_ J 3rr-- t --tl? °o I _I II ?J I 1 l I ri s 1 I- r ?l 11 ail 1 ?I d If ,,? I 1 J ' L 1 I I I I N t? --eil n LI 310 L `aJ I ?N - - H L_? -1?V t_ 36-' -I 310 ---- I I 1 I o 1N j O r-___ 1 N 1 I I-J 1 1 I I c-_J --- Q` I I I I I I i I 1 I I ? 1 W I I I I 1 I I 2 r---- I r I -- r- 1 ' I 1 Li 1 I I I__I 1 y i `D L rn (??i'- - -t°o-N N N 418 a O --- i. N Rf3 NNN N GULF-TO-BAY BL c GULF-TO-BAY B VD r-- j LJJ co 1__ _J I I s 1+? ' 1Ll_ J ` i I, '=J ' HPv 111 -1 I ' S J j ' I I I L-r--' '---. -- j L JE ir -L, ? I 1 I 1 _ _l k"- _ L I r? l i _ L_ 1__J 1 I N L r-- 1 I - ` I- 509 I ;j ?_ I LrJ Ir-? r-? ? L--' W r 5TH ST r l_1 J r l t__1 I S I 11 1_ I ? 1 -1 r Q I J i _ 513 T' - , '1 I l r 1 1 THf .T L' rJ r l l IS1 1,-,? i r 1 1---1 "I ---A r-/ I Zoning Map Owner. Rophie Family Partnership I Case: FLD2006-04022 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.964 Size(Acres) : PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Car Quest Atlas Page: 290B S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\zone.doc Zoning Map Owner. ( Rophie Family Partnership I Case: FLD2006-04022 Site: I 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property I 0.964 j Size(Acres): Car Quest PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\zone.doc • 0 1 r? 116 115 r-'RIB N N N N WHITMAN ST Q - - m 1 21I-I 1 J 1 2pril r ?o0 U+ r- I -r+ ~? ~ J I I f- i r 2f L' T N lI I _ ?f1 7 I ?I I I 1 ? I r, 204 w i -- `l , I l 1, L--L' ' , rJ 1 I- -' L- 21 2'B -1 _ X208 ; 2 1 --112 W I I __ I L ? I I __I r_, ? , , I J r-, _ ...I 1 r-ZL 21 L__J I Q LJ r_I IF I1216 W 211 '-Z! !-1 ! r' `-HJ ` I - -- r , -- i -, rP j 2f7-1 zr g CHAUCER ST ? I I I , I_ i`N 1 r 1 i_J W 1 _I I__-1 r--I _-_J _ ?• Lv ?n __ ?r? '? _ r. L-- N ?V 1 1 1 I I N 1 1 1 I 1 1 --- I_.r ET I I 1 11 I ..1 ?J F I I L I L--? I L-' I r- LJ I I l" ZI L_I I --?1 Q 3 3111 L--' I I - `-- Single Family Residential ? ? --1 3t7 ? ? I --t 1 l r, I 4- -- j ? ( °0 1 =J tol I ml ml pl rJ 1 , I L L I I J -A L_ I-= N N L-J L-N _,? L _ N L'310 3f'rJ L-41 -J N -1 310 ? ' I ----' 401--- SHELLEY ST 1 , Vehicle Service Retail & ---? I I --_; I 1 accessory ----- - I I Vehicle 1 l 1 I ; I ; , I 1 2 ?; L Service L I I -__, I---- Retail 1 1 ' L--------- , I I .. . L . 1 ._. _ ___ I I__I ; I IJ 1 --- ?,- - -e°v?prr? c°, 416 '? 1---- o 0 N N (V N N cV N N N G - O-BAY BLVD GULF-TO-BAY BLVD - , ? r-- Mobile Rome Park Mobile Home Park I N N I , r-?; N; I 73 , t-I ' 1 .S 1 i ti - I LI _i t J . 1 1 -E I _ -CC l W Office 231 _r- ? -1 + r--, I 5TH ST --L . Overnight Accomodation ti --?L I , V L • L r-?? 1 r-1l I fl?l r• __ , -I 5 ti I--__I I_? I L__f ? W 515 'tl r 2 6THI Ju `- 0 }p - L _h ( I t II i -I f `' I 1r _? I---I d L - Existing Use Map Owner. ( Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2006-04022 Property Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd 0.964 Size(Acres). ; PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Car Quest Atlas Page: 290B S.\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (1VS)\maps\proposed.doc 0 0 Location Map Owner. Rophie Family Partnership i Case: I FLD2006-04022 Site: I 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd (Size er es): I 0.964 Car Quest PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 i Atlas Page: 290B S:\Planning Department\C D BVLEX (FLD) Vending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\location.doc 0 0 AWN X• ? ? r ? F: ,K va. - U41111-4-5/1-11, I-ZL32 MEMO Z-VzL/Ll;- -- Z 1, '. A J ? Aerial Map Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2006-04022 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.964 Size (Acres) : Car Quest PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B SAPlanning Department\C D BVLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulf To Bay Blvd 2430 Car Quest (C) 06-01-06 (JVS)\maps\aerial.doc LL _° Clearw ater U • Printed: 512512006 Times are subject to change DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, June 1, 2006 8:30 a.m. ' STAFF REVIEW 9:00 am Case Number: FLD2006-04022 - 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Owner(s): Alan Rophie C/O Alba Consulting Corp Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Alba Consulting John Atanasio 1420 Court Street Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-443-0718, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.964 acres locate at the southwest corner of the intersection of Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street Atlas Page: 290B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to allow retail sales and service use in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district; including reduction to front (north) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 9.9 feet, reduction to front (east) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 14.9 feet, reduction to front (east) setback to entrance canopy supports from 25 feet to 17 feet, reduction to front (south) setback to pavement from 25 feet to zero feet, to allow a six foot tall fence within the front setback area, 9.94 feet from Shelly Street property line, and a reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from ?? spaces to ?? spaces (5 spaces to ?? spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area), as a Comprehensive Infill Project, per Section 2-704.C; and reduction to front (east) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 5 feet, and reduction to front (south) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: John Schodtier, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . The following to be addressed prior to building permit: A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. Contact Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Prior to CO: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 1, 2006 - Page I Eanvirpnmental: • 1 . Indicate how stormwater will be directed into swale with 6-inch curb between parking lot and swale, Sheet 4. Fire: I _ No Issue's Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . No Issues. Landscaping: I . Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. 2. Not all landscape buffers are dimensioned on the landscape plan. Revise. 3. Indicate interior landscaped areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled on the site plan (the landscape plan is will be too busy to show these areas). 4. Provide written and photographic evidence showing hardship with regards to installing the 15 foot landscape buffer along Gulf To Bay Blvd. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: Prior to CDB: The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria. The drainage analysis is to include soils analysis including a double ring infiltration test. Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Acess to Dumpster must be from Shelly St Traffic Engineering: I . Parallel parking spaces shall comply with current City dimensional standards (8' wide by 23' long). 2. On street parking spaces shall not encroach into any through lanes. 3. On street parking shall not be counted as required number of parking spaces as these can be removed by the City. 4. Provide a notorized letter to the City's Traffic Operations Division that reads: "It is agreed that in the event that on street parking spaces are removed for any reason by the City of Clearwater, the owner will not seek compensation of any kind". 5. Show on driveway to Shelley Street and the intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Kilmer Avenue 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles. 6. Remove any object that interferes with sight distance (parallel parking spaces along Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 1, 2006 - Page 2 1 Provide 15 copies 6rmal building elevations for the subject site 0 to proceeding to the Community Development Board (CDB). 2. Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (1) Building setback requirements - provided as comprehensive infill along side (south commercial) states 127.56 feet to building - This is misleading, I don't believe a building addition is going to occur here, the Enterprise Rent A Car business is there at a closer setback, and the setback from Gulf to Bay is considered a front setback, not a side. Revise 3. Project Site Data table on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect (2) Required parking spaces for retail sales/service are 5 parking spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of gfa, not 1.5 as referencing vehicle service in the IRT zoning. Revise and show required and proposed parking counts for both the retail sales business, enterprise rent a car business (2.5 spaces/l000 sf of lot display area), and grand totals. 4. If the proposed canopy over the front entrance on Kilmer Avenue is not affixed to the ground than it cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). If it is affixed to ground than a request for reduction to the front seback from Kilmer Avenue is required. 5. Sheet 3 indicates 16 parallel off street parking spaces, but the plan only shows 8. - also indicates 30 total spaces, but the plan shows 28. Clarify or revise. 6. How does the stormwater drain over a 6 inch curb and through a 6 foot fence to the stormwater swale? 7. Clarify what type of fence is proposed along Shelly Street. 8. The response to General Applicability Criteria #6 is difficult to visuallize ("the proposed use wil provide architectural, visual... improvements to revitalize the property...") without the proposed building elevations. 9. The response to Comprehensive Infill criteria #1 should address the parking, setback, & landscaping reductions with regards to impracticality without deviations. 10. The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #6 ends with "are in the direction of the city LDC and its goals along the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along Gulf to Bay. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". 11 . The response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #7 ends with "and the Gulf to Bay corridor". This proposal is not in the direction or goals with regards to landscaping or setbacks along the Gulf to Bay corridor. Consider revising this statement with regards to "along the GTB corridor". 12. Provide documentation confirming Comprehensive Infill Criteria #8 - adequate off street parking is available to be shared with adjacent property, in addition to the proposed on street parking. 13. Parking demand study - is what is submitted acceptable? 14. Signage indicated in the project proposal will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) approval to increase the sign area above the maximum 24 square feet. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. 15. Revise all site plans to show site visibility triangle at GTB and Kilmer 16. Revise all site plans to include existing vehicle display area(s) and customer parking spaces. 17. Revise site and landscape plan to include all overhead utility lines and poles. 18. ***If ROW is to be converted from asphalt to landscape area, what type of landscape (grass) is permitted? PLAN SHOWS NOTHING. 19. Does outdoor lighting exist? Is outdoor lighting proposed? If so, show on site plan. 20. On Page 3 of the Comp Landscape plan, the notary did not complete his portion of the form. Revise and resubmit for the form to be valid. 21 . Revise #2 of your request for deviations found in the Project Narrative. This statement is incorrect.. "Improvements to the subject propoerty, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, shall be limited to the portion of the lot occupied by 9000 sf building and the east property line of the enterprise rent a car site." 22. Proposal exceeds 25% of building valuation according to Paul Newman with PCPA ($221,600) taken on May 19, 2006. 23 . Explain how the delivery of parts to local installers is done. The project narrative indicates 85% of Carquests business is done in this manner. Also, How many delivery vehicles will there be and where will they be parked/stored when the business is closed. 24. Provide an itemized break down of $60,000 project valuation. You have exceeded the 25% improvement provision of the Parking and Landscaping code that requires compliance with all of both code sections. Per PCPA, Paul Newman the valuation of the just the buildings is $221,600 Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 1, 2006 - Page 3 Pinellas County Property Appra Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 04 Page 2 of 9 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 0400 18-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:36:28 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales ROPHIE, ALAN OBK: 08632 OPG: 0326 ROPHIE, RALPH BETECH, CECILA COHEN, CHERYL C/O ALBA CONSULTING CORP 1420 COURT ST EVAC: Mon-EUAC CLEARWATER FL 33756-6147 Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 267.03 2003 2004 l f - : sa es rom 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 C } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 671,200 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 671,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 671,200 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 15,596.81 1} 150 x 280 12.00 42, 000.00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 15, 596.81 6} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 15, 596. 81 Short Legal E 150FT OF W 494.57FT OF N 28OFT OF S 330FT OF SW 1/4 Description OF HE 1/4 PhUL IJ -U ti-3Nti1 X _r 0-A -S Building Information b p 2S ss yGJ http://pao. co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 Pinellas County Property Appra*Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 04* Property and Land Use Code descriptions . Building 1 . Building 2 . Building 3 Building #1 Page 3 of 9 18 / 29 / 18 / 00000 / 130 / 0400 :01 18-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:36:12 Commercial Card 01 of 3 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 Structural Elcmcnts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 9 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 11959 Effective Age 31 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1} Base Area 1.00 2,518 7} .00 0 2} Canopy .25 300 8} .00 0 3} .00 0 9} .00 0 4} .00 0 10} .00 0 5} .00 0 11} .00 0 6} .00 0 12} .00 0 Commsrc.ial Extra FE?atur6s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} ASPHALT 16660 1.75 16,660 29,160 29,160 999 2} .00 0 0 0 0 3} .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 29,160 Building #2 http://pao. co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 Pinellas County Property AppraiijInformation: 18 29 16 00000 130 0406 Page 4 of 9 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 0404 :02 18-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:36:08 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 S?ru?c?ural E1?m?n-ts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 18 Party gall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 11959 Effective Age 35 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 6.00o 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10? .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial EXTra Fo2rturc3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 http://pao. co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 Pinellas County Property AppraieInformation: 18 29 16 00000 130 044 Page 5 of 9 18 / 29 / 18 / 00000 / 134 / 0400 :03 18-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:36:29 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 Structural E1?m?n?s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall 307E Common Wall Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 11966 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,000 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Foaturos Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*1aooF? http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1&b=1 &c=1&r=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 Pinellas County Property Appraisgr Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 04040 D "Y'- AbL ? AVE 300 .......` ........... '. E 4VE >7 1 E aVLE .` 11 I1L R AVF KI HELLEY 12 J Y Page 6 of 9 301 2441 2447 2455 KI VE "S EE H C E A T ST ST 311 2442 2446 2452 K1 V HES L LE H S E A E ST T J43@5 ° GULF ° I.LYSAc(c) N I. BA 333tS? 05.2 o.nG Ti F o u5 4246 2431 u 2ULg c' 7U0 F 2.14T OA c (c) caqu 9 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (1997) http://pao. co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16& s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 TO TO Pinellas County Property Apprai;,j Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 040 Page 7 of 9 ?#4 SM T , &JPI IL • :.. '` 1' i t a fit . 4 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2000) http://pao. co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 040 Page 8 of 9 Pinellas County Property Apprai 16 1 ib 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao. co.pinellas.fl .us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &t=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprai Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 040 T SS w Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Page 9 of 9 • ?f Back to Search Pale An explanation of this screen http://pao. co.pi nellas.fl.us/htbi n/cgi-scr3?o= l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 5/18/2006 • • TYPICAL CAROUEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS, SIGNAGE AND IMAGE 7 A-?! r° Lk_ W GO D N u- V O J ( w LL- Z O U v a C? J E 0 3.29.02 FLOOR TILE PATTERN DETAIL 05 AT STANDARD PROTOTYPE ENTRY ENLARGED 04 TOILET PLAN ?_------------- I' I I I ? I y. 9' HOER t eE.7 RAOGg t I I ` r I RETAIL FIX UFM r i I 1 I I 1 I I u 1,-6^ 0 FIXTURE PLAN I 8CA1.4 VS" . I'-0" I 30'.0• 30'-0° DAY SPACA ^ I BAY SPACING O I SAY 6PAC1J0 > ?p Y A 7 6" PIPE ?OF SGVAG! I2.10° 6'•4` A'= H'•l' I'•6" 3,•0 ?E ' a ______ -- _ C. ro -' ________ __ - _ I ?_ !f_-_- I V I I room finish schedule DDOR MARK ROOM NAME Ica; BASE FRONT 8b . RETAIL E a AR EVOWALL . PARI'6 CLG. HT. _ REMARK6 101 RETAIL SALES R BI WI WI W1 WI C.1(M-ALT) VARIES 6Q FLOOR PATTERN AND ACCNT6 102 WHOLESALE SA.L10 M W =-ALT) W (W!-ALT) E (W•ALU WINE-ALT) CI (03-ALt 711'-0" (VARIE! - ALTERNATE) 102A SERVICE F2 W1 WI WI WI GT 711'-0" (CELL AT S'-0" - ALTERNATE) - 103 BRAKE DOUM LATHE 02 62 WI WI U6 WI C 711'-0" (CEIL. AT 6.0" - ALTERNATE) 104 TOILET Fl 62 U43 W3 W3 W3 GI 711'-0" ( KIL AT 6.0" - ALTEMIATE) ' I0o OIrICE Fl D2 W WI WI WI 01 711'-0" (CEIL AT 6.0" - AI.TCRNATE) paint color selections RECIPE PC" RECIPE FOR CUSTOM COLOR CUSTOM caLOR ' " Fl vG.T. - ARIMSTRows !?-GSR60011-T7 A61SITE DM41) Y.ARaIao3T BLUE (6WS-TVAHOUSE BLUE E646) WHITN ?.ML BLDG, STANDARD WHITE SAFEn'R!D= ULTRA Ca. BLUE. GAL F2 SEALED CONCRETE EXTERI RED Sw Non POET WETOM COLOR RED 4 07- WHin= A OL BLUE= 61 {• cOrE YMTL BABE M MATCH POLAR WH[1E IE SEE NOTE FOR CUSTOM DOLOR wl,.. BLUE S/32 CTP SOLD 4 OL FLUB O/M VIOLETC pi 4' COVE vMYL BASE - 6' ' W4In SHER'WIN WILLIAMS - GIU1004-PURE WHITE 3H32 WHIn WI MYPaJM WALL BOARD - PAINTED WHITE INTERIOR RED US NOTE FOR CUSTOM COLOR RED W2 AW-06 1D 6TRUCTURE BLUE S6 NOTE FOR CUSTOM COLOR BLUE 6HEtWN WILLIAMB IaTM WATER BORN PP.3N7 W.I. PIBERTIlADS RENPOIRCED PANE,B P EXTERIOR WOOD TRIM SHALL 8E WHITE 1O MATCH METAL BUILDING STANDARD WHITI G GYPSUM WALL BOARD - PANTED WHITE C EET06SD STRUCTURE - PAINT= WHITC C3 EQ=06ED 6TRUGTWRE d oor sc hedule T M ZE L www? HOW DOLOR REMARKS DI PIE 3'-0'W7'-V-1 N4 PM-3 DA-I 1 DARRC BRONZE 02 PR 3'-0")f1'-0')fl 3/4 PM•1 174.1 3 SHALL MATCH EXnRIOR WHO SPOOR SHALL BE M GA. FRAME SHALL eE 14 GA, PROWCU RAPPED WALK "YII FOR FORKLWr AC4Z 03 31•0'k11-01X1 314' FM.I OM-I 2 64ALL MATCH EXTERIOR W411 Z " 04 3'-0""fCi'•0'kl 3!4" PM-2 OW1 A P2AM • BWI0m4 PURE WHITE a. D'•0'k1'-0'XI L4^ PM-2 DWI S FRAMM - SUI1004 PURE WHIn CE 3'-0"Xr." 3/4• rM-2 DWI 6 RRAME - SU COA PURE WHIn = L'rG.IILNp AVOP=f. I A-N dtt Wr >.I V=1'1FMRRiR1FR 41N MEYtT.W FFI•LYW OKR 6I N M..PrHU =R I w A Y EWE. ICNtA.E DIE FHOOM NTpttOP P"M (04 EKAU 30NAAE EM MOom uta .OHL46E ou IIIHCw6 FawcY NR4.. p>OIA7OOW tAN THRrtt OIA.M 3OU.r CYROCE>N , Ayr..J>LL ENTFI. Y•LL ru'IPnI ?vel.w IYr.14RE.. VI.. IrEl. r MFEYOO.D Rw.= ran l:Ai IwAMVO nawFaa.uxwuuPUmw+uu ,1°'y? iwaia ?' a DOOR SCHEDULE / ROOM RINfSH SCHEOULE ELLI NWOOD WMION A660CIArM LTD. 16 THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ARCHITECT, AND AUTHORI THE LOCAL ARCHIfEOTlENVG1N?E TO UTILIZE. DUPLICAn. AND REV16E THESE CCNCW T TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, ALL OTHER APPLIC-1 00DC6. THIS 16 A PROTOTYPE DESIGN BAMW ON CRITERIA FOR RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. PERFORMANCE'. CRITERIA MAY HAVE TO BE RVASSD TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL R[GUIRHMLN DESIGNiDWL7 CONTRACTOR 64ALL PRCPAPA , 10 SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION ORAWIN06 TO THE OWWR FOR REVIEW AVD APPROVAL PRIOR TO RMI7TNG OR COMMENCING WORK 3' DIAraTEz BARRIER FREE AREA AS FEET ADA GIUDEL6&B ELECTRIC WATER OOOLEN -1. MOANMID DEEP SINC 4 _ B I I I 9 I ? I 1 6 0 ? AT AJ ABCNIXSEE A2 ( =cbJV ? 2'-?I II ( II it II ? « I I A I I - - _- ------------ ------_r.. I`-- I II I I II ETAIL 6ALJ6 Q ? -,$ ? 11 A2 R N q ? i ? [3) 2k2 H ? n I g N P ? { ] Il I y I ( 4• DTA. BiL. CO23TN I II Y17PK COlW7El! WITH I I I A2 I 4 W/&Q'X R' BABE PLATE I 11 PEGBOARD AT WALL II • ---..?..,_.._------ - vtaR7-At_._..._.2'rdL.------ ------- R 6'•6' AFL R aa s S®1 LARDED PLAN 1 Z i TOR RXi+flW I ' 71 p 4 ACO4.60RItB I EQ EQ 1 I " ! ----_- arr. BD.ON ---- zo In " ® j BRAKE '1-EWCi, l 30/6 ,n GA MTL STLGS . 16' OD. MAX LAT®ROOT L?r I DEEP a ?N ? W/ SERVICE PA U C? I? T ® ml HG6t 6161 O'.0" 6'• )D 37'-0' 3 t 09 EdBP. PLATFORM &AM 6E2 METAL FLOOR PLAN 6r'•l e. VD" • I'•0" 02 03 0 F- Cf) Z 0 0 0 Z ?L 4:Y+ .U X y O ? S 9 v o?o$ T °o U 3 y c?aF Ga ? ? F M O1 I SI H a r4 C) E- C) to ova W.V P4 W v amp C) X L) E_ Q Y U w C JUL .? y. A„ 96114.01 sued: 3.29 2 DBc BY, DSO CKO BY: APS REYISICNs F1EEI 01 A-1 DF • E 129.02 GARYSAlB7 RW 6TRIPD . VN IING AT CtILM6 CAROLLR -1- GTRIPE Q^ ACCO47 STRIPE • CAROL967 1 O° 4CCNT BTRIPS - CARaim Rm q S e CeRCIJSST RW STRIPS BWLOMO PRAMIL PAINMM ACCJWT STRIPE • C4RMWW i e' ACCNT STRfP! - CARMABT S1JY. CBd SBT BLLM STRIPE BOIL0M5 FRAM. PAM OPOSEDNGATC NNri FAGM GAT VINYL ------ -- -------------- __ _ _ ?? O f P M I IC4:y I \ ? ?? A TS ( I PAMim OYA 70 RILM6-' \ MWNM D MSJL W I - p4h®61t,D. e 8 VWYL PACING AT CSILAM TO CWL ° CARSWS6T RIM CARCAST BLIS (-^ PANTW awa r '", 4 4 I AMTW CWS. A GWS, I I to CSIL I TO COIL OPN StYC. TO I I I CSIL 1 I <" VINYL BASE TYP AT 4" NN°1'L L'.ASt, TYP A ALL EM D Wq' L BIIRFACLB ONLY ALL WO-06W W&" VJWACS6 CW.T (CO NATE WITH FIA'TURE W*-.. m) ALI. BTORD-RONT 4' VNYI. SAM TYP A T ° NNTF 64WR t1'P AT <4- V SIOLO6W WALL BRUW.C 02= Uk SS ONLY (COORDINATE WITH FIXEAQS WPPLRR) APT 6TO RERCt.7 ALL NW O WALL SU R'ACSS O"LY CN?.yAT NBICSJ PAS /COORO Fia•NRS &7PW 1 (COQmNATE WITH FI %NM SUPPLI .-.v . ATION INTERIOR SLEV 1 0 INTE?O R ELEVO TION O INTERIOR ELEVATION - 108 ATION WTERI ME LEV 1 07 O E ? m QYl A7 A'•' I TIM TRIM 26 GA, G4LVALIM VP PR METAL PAND. 26 fi4 OALVAL" METAL { 6° INWL, W VINYL PAM* TA. FASCLA l 1410+4 wvi N TD. FASCI4 NGN SAW, FA6CW T.O. WISH Y I I ? T PT E ? DUSDM4 PRAPIE ! W N. A .6 L dJILARS3 _°____, I •6. ; r_____`_-______}______________ Y MSUL 1111 VAJY ! 916 I 14'3' PAINTW,71P. \ / ' '• " P4BCI4 eA SO, FABCIA I 7 ? I Rte- J/ I Litz OF FARTS FACNCIL R@SR TO GPWd r- - I T? I PAN= allB ro aILMY . I l ! F Ada T [ CARQuaw 6 IMWAL WALL I I I L f EfPJSSD 4• (R-N NouL - W/ VINYL ?'? 7 PANAL6 I OPN TO RRAfL? I t [ Y .To, W4LL PAN" ( I ' _ F\1 F FiD -R -L FLOOR PIN. K.CX R GOIJC.ILAB WITH WWM. l W Ulm ON 6tOM TO MA ON GTOIJS CROSS SECTION 06'1 LONCsITUDINAL SECTION O VV LS: Iro^ , L-®" PROMI6MW SL89 Q' TRIM 2e 64 PR 64LVAlAME ROOT PANilL, TT'F aJMR NTN C01p4&PWT TO aavADE ARTI"W epl1ES 1.* 67RLIC7JRAL DRAG T" WALL PAAELS BY MSG j ROOF SLAPS DEYv - I - MP GM WN :AWIA ?, ,Wt • bTS. / ? Wv[ FAEOIM ALL STEEL FR41NG plftm= Low 4 RAT rwAL Nzmm M TO RT u,3^ WALL PANW I LOU A" RI 'w• OJ? ??'? , I4.6 DD. FA6GA ,"C E16UWT FANS DT?D N6CIA B METAL WALL PAN" FM. FM. FLOOR {LLMWOOO Ol6RN AE60^,.fgT66, LTD. 16 THE ' ' - WMJCTURAL BRACMO ` Awr*ITFOT. 4NA AJTNDRI ASE, rrmvrwJ%tkFER TO umim THE LOCA PROM! ALL &MM MAMNO MMIRO TO &A-PORT . M^JCATE A?.= REN6E TNEBS CONOEPT ALL M WIRW L=VWM AND WWAWT PANS TO AMLRE =V-LIANCE WItN LOCAL, WATE, SIDE ELEVATION 04 ALL Ori = APPLIC60LE Q=ft TNI6uAPROTOi"m000IONOAS=ON REAR ELEVATION 03 SCALD: 1/S" , I'-6" CRItEpA 410M PALEGN, NORTN CAROLINA SCALRi VD" , 1'-6' PEIWCWM CE CIWTERLA MAY NAVE TO SIE •---?- mrw1wo TO COI'FLY WRM LOCeL REOII OXbM4SDILO O"RACTOR 6NALL FRSPAM I 4P TRR1 60'M 'AUTO PALM' 64ON Sy 004SR MIRMIT CONMRLGnON C4%AW6g6 TO TNS 1544 LOGO DY OIAM R ONN6R FOR 14E1Ai7 AND Aep100VA1. PRIOR 70 MRYCRAN. DRAC tR3M 78101 LOGO BY OVA" R00F 6LOPE 7 E 17E9ITTNo OR OOFPINCMO wme- OU#433t----\ *ON 'Ail r0 PMTS' 80N 15Y - iA. N6CIA NION OJRWR ,?g 6+ / RT A AUTO FR?MI6NW DLUG Q" TA LA ARTWSW SERI E6 L12 ? . ... ATRS P HsCW "vm ?I ALL PAM{,6 DY MBCI NIOM EAN W , ....? .. • u rSO, FASOIA"' TO FA6CIA I . SD. PABCIb •.I•i „A6DIA 11 I - ? I S an SSE mllAS FOR < ` - ° 6L6 003 FOR DOOM 4 WNDOW ?? IT4L ( DOOR ( WINDOW DETAIL6 i - P NKLS " ? f ' I ? { .m-6 i •61 0 FOOR ? F x FLOOR STRWCfl11W Ri. DRAG FM. METALWW4 PANRLS FRONT ELEVATION 1 S IDE ELEVATION ol ALM V6" . 1'-6" SCALS: 1/S" , T,-6• . Lm m%. '- N r ro m ?- O ?o O ?k U ? c %p m F ?arep? 5 m ?b C) ?m O OPc ? F M m m m a rn Cl) aF- a 0 E- W ? P, C) ? rn E- r E-,ro aW ? 0QA4 F-U Z z W a a: to z 0 U V, 0 U 0 LL 0 Z 96114.01 ISSUED: 3.29.02 DWG By, DSC LK0 BY: (kE REVISIONS SHEET NO. A-2 OF 3 0 0 3.29.02 r r•a^ O ? ? I I 0,j v 'r `/ g o i n n n 09UC SOAP T.TC&C O RIC PAgR DBPlCBI 7150!° ODPC?STR 7' 7171 ft 7' UTATI WATIR TOJRL fKVSUme4Tana) ccamt oIB•EaaR TYPICAL FIXTURE AND ACCESSORY MOUNTIN[r ELEVATIONS SCALE: I/<" • I'-0" 6'TP. Di ABOVt M O= BOS PEODO ATTACH OREEC, TO &nx -GYP, DD, WALL - RAT WOOD TRIM PANTS= PLUG'IC F Q95OARO ON WGOD ST=D WCRKC Rr7R' StCTIOI C RIM WIRE MOULD REPER TO KLEGTRICAL r-3/4" PL,1 LL 09 e,•m. REM pm m ;uvnm O Ob- l GLEVATION AT WHOLESALE WORK COUNTERS &CALK. I/2" • I'-0° ILIN4 TO 'On smm• rolNr LCAC,oAO GR Bm+/u UL LDFS ! !00.11'. 151 W/ 2X10 • le" O'C' 11 j 06• PSP LL. am I` OTAI.4DARD I/4. gZNajMAKS All MbQm? VITAA,L DLDO GOMPONINTS AND ROQ P ' ? 11 n n D9.a mAN PACcwmm METAL IL - Ml_ TOP TRACK DITll®J MTI. DOTTOM PURLLW. CUT t Opm II" / 6CRf.10, TO CONT. CACH IND. FASTEN TO MTL TRACK BlNEA7M I'Oi N i COMING DY Me= "TL TOP A D/D" MTL TRAOG 001,114 TO P IND R 81=0 CVERT• J ROOP L ?? b" O.C. a D/e" MTL BOTTOM TRACK V2"G.WB. CONTNUOU& Ash C'-0" 3/4' PWD _ Y -CONT. MTL CORPUR BEAD (TYP) encTION DETAIL AT 08 WMAOSM WALL OVER SALES, co" Tim 47 NOTE, PETAL OLO4 COMP•OW ANO -BUILDING LINE DCI MMTL 1 CONNECTIONS VARY, COORD. W/ PETAL 5UILOIN4 r1AtJVACTIWlR COORD. W/ n" MTL.OL. MAW!. MCC OP 81010 Z. GIIETS PRAMS IM 0111POBT 2'-0" OD. Me^"•y COlA)'4.1 r SUPPORT BEAM MAX I ELLNWODD CCSION ASBCTTATEB, LTD. 15 THC OONCEP UAL C 94ON ARC 4ITICT, AND AUTHOI THE LOCAL ARCHITECT/1VGN? TO uTILIZZ, OUPLICATE, ANO PM%,q" TM43M CONClP• ORA TO ACDURNI COMP LIANC1 WITH LOCAL, STAIR, / ALL OT"m APPLICABLE CODES. TN15 Is A PftOTOTYPE OB31GN DAMO ON CRITERIA POR RAL KIGH, NORTN CAROLINA PERFOIEMA7W$ CRITERIA MAY HAVE TO b REVIDEO TO 07.711 .01` WITN LOCAL REl11REPE7 DEBIGN)BGEILD CONTMACTOR WALL 04tw"Am DBMIT CONDTR7CTICN 04AWno3B TC THE OWNGR POR REY[ W A),P APPROVAL PRIOR T P7LRMRTING OR CCME.4CNG WORIL Nom METAL OLOG COCPCNCJTD A. 'ND CONNEGTIO G VARY, COORD, W/ METAL DUII. I MANdPPACNRER BUILDING LM! COOED W/ MGTAL BLDG MPR PACE OF 10.40 POST COPING DY "C" GIRT t MDGr-\ ANGLE TRIM LN/R DY MTL - T A OL_ "R OO 81a7 1O SUPPORr Dt MITL R ((r ROOF PURLN I -? ^ CONTtNUCUO =X 4 PI.Im - CUPPORT BRACKIT MI6= PACADE CAL MTL PANRC ENID POST Z" GIRTS 2'-0" OG. MUt? SUPPORT BM 1-1 M COL PRAMS SUPPORT DM I n 1,4' Pw0 Ab A3 i (3) 2X0 DRYWALL eIt S X 4 WOOD NfADiR EXTlIRIOR SLOG MBOI I•ITAL r 4 GI °C' GIR " P4R4MING i UL 30? W 9 WALL PM18. "S" GIRT= • 2'-0" O C GIRTB 2'-0" OL. WALLS. All 30 CUJA40 CLOGURC . . MAX MAX STANDARD 2/4. STEEL STUD, w, O.O. °C" GIRT "'-^? 7X4 PmmwCUq_ . 01,Mlt R WALL t O.4LY MBCI DAM 1 I • , . .. ..... .... STUDS. le" OG. tRM t SORrc 'M MEN31 BAIT NDJLATION IN pAS,.d TRI BAD! TR W-0' !MlRIOR STUD MTL WALL PANEL A SOFFIT t SOFFIT PROVIDE WOOD BLOCK TREATED PL,A DY MTL BLDG MRE GIRD N WALL 0.b "CAJIRlO. Oyu 8ECT1 0? VICECAREAC?J2A LATF tRfQ 5 71 PIE R ORI°rOFFIT =UGH O A PARTI TION AT BGC ENO WALL O^ PAHlCvH WWA1LLS00WAL AT TIAL SECTION 0/? UJ COUNTER TE W m glazing sc hedule rr Aee MAW Bins X W T WJUIAW" Q4 4'-15' %Y-10" X i" OOJBLE PAW Qi 4'-0'%Y-10%1" DOUBLE PANE d 2'•E•Xe'•0-X? 00184E PANE Q° 2'•e• X 3'-10" X P 114014ATID PlTAL PAIM (COLOR TO MATCH PFW 3`•e• X 2'-e" X 7" SNSLK PAVE DT MANWCTNER 00,1516 PANG TEMPER i a r{ 0 0 W 2 e'-4°axT.4" r.Im 2 ' e'c^ 2° 2.•Im,2- 3•Yy r am"p2 , a'•Im 2 ' a-m Y m' )'•4' 30' 3m° 2" Q Qa Q G _ am © D A r 0 0 0 0?° 0 fma 15z1 li_"a ALUTINM OAK VRSER WOOD HOLLOW METAL (SOLID GOPC) fINEULAIEO) © L? +.y HOLLOW MEAL wow AUMDw STORE PAtONT f WW,ATW) (WITH THIVDM14L BRCAK) DOOR AND FRAME ELEVATIONS DI•N r ALLMWJ I STORE PRONE N. M. !WITH THERMAL a4tNAK) (IN'. tow BUILDING LINK 14, --PACE OP R1410 PRANK I -C- GIRT t AVf3L! TRIM ROQ RNILNS Z::::STANDNNG CLAM ONE WAY %1D1ON 01 LTy 020" 4e aM1 ra ? I N ?o ?a v ew O v1 R a m b m ? T O Q a? ? m •s 3 u ? o to I m aT I m EN r-I a? as 7 0 ~ E - Co O m W E'+ a?RR Q W 'd U) lZ aW U a a I w I J i Q I C IL 0 F_ F" 0 0 cc 0 11 0 Z 96114.01 ISSUEIP. 3.29.02 DWG BY: 011NN CKU BY: CHKNA AVAMNS SHEET N0. A-3 or 4 i ? 3.29.02 a °a 0 alternate glazing schedule GLASS SIZE "AFC H W T REMARKS Q W-0° K 61-0" % 1" DOUBLE PANE Q W-0' x 2'-S" x V DOUBLE PANE Q 3'-I0' x 2'-S" X I• DOUBLE PANE Q T-S" X 2'-S" x 1' INBULA ETAL P TEDM ?-su COLOR TO MATCH 1 ALUMrNUm STORE FRONT (W11H THERLIAL BREAK) ALTERNATE FRAME ELEVATION FOR SIDE ENTRY 8C44-8: 1/4" . I'-0" 10 I ALTERNATE FIXTURE PLAN WITH PAINT SALES 09 SCALE: VI6" • 1'-0" r __7 MACNIHE BNOP ®J ^! 1=1 MS ROOM RETAIL $A: BAY BPACIW, MRL SOFFIT 13'-6' A6 ABOVE BY -I.&, I / I WALL TRANBITI DETAILS TO BE ?. PROVIDED by 5L=1_ t'"UFACTURER LINE OF / BLDG. WALL ? AJ5O LIE OF FACIA ABOVE RETAIL BALES ROOM -------- --------- ----- _. ' J 7 ALTERNATE FLOOR PLAN CORNER ENTRY 03 SCALE: I/O"" • I'-0" FLOOR TILE PATTERN DETAIL FLOOR TILE PATTERN DETAIL I ALTERNATE FLOOR PLAN //? AT CORNER ENTR' 1071 / AT CENTER SIDE ENTRY 05 y SIDE ENTRY 02 BCALE: VB" . BGALE: 1/0" . I'-0" SCALE: 1/0"" . I'-0^ ALTERNATE FLO ? OR PLAN WITH MACHINE SHOP 08 AT FLOOR TILE PATTERN STANDARD PROT OTYPEAENTRY 06 FLOOA IDE MN mR DETAIL 0 /? R PLAN ALTS DE ENTR 01 SCALE: 1/19," . V-0" m IB O LTq -O a C7 O U z O vi °p s s° ¢?e9 ?+ u ?m 0°0 n r Q 0 ?m .O u e O ffi O ? m z° n q F9< Uyy ^ _ w 6 n Ml m rn m .0 m I rn V) rn Z? .a a a as o O r E - (Z) W ? aH ova aW W ?D r. C) U Z w J Q ??pg ? ®tl 113 A `S S 0 U U) Z 0 U 0 LL r 0 Z 96114,01 ISSUED: 3.29.02 DWG BY: SCT CKD BY. GHE RE`AS10NS SHEET NO. A-4 OF 4 Y.r `m • • milli rr-? - s) aloG ?W,am Q les b-F C.Alt QUG&T b U,damq -(7,a4 -dLQ . • • T 0 0 q lt??If r .:; ??i 0 PARTS Lincoln Associates Civil Engineering Group, Inc. June 27, 2006 Scott Rice, PE City of Clearwater Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS Proposed CarQuest (LA Civil #043-003.100) FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Rice: On behalf of the applicant, Alba Consulting Corporation, LA Civil is submitting a response to the following DRC Staff Comments received from you during the DRC Meeting on 6/1/06 regarding the Stormwater Design Requirements for the project site. STORMWATER ATTENUATION CALCULATIONS CITY REQUIREMENTS: "The Engineer is to submit drainage calculations for the proposed parking lot and dimensions of the stormwater pond to show that it meets the retention volume needed for a 50 year design storm per City criteria." EXISITNG CONDITIONS: Runoff Site Weighted Surface Area Coef. . Area Coeff. Buildings = 12,550 SF * 0.95 / 41,992 SF = 0.299 Paving= 25,151 SF * 0.95 / 41,992 SF = 0.569 Pond = 0 SF * 1.00 / 41,992 SF = 0.000 Pervious = 4,291 SF * 0.20 / 41,992 SF = 0.020 41,992 SF Existing Runoff Coefficient (Cpre) = 0.888 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com CarQuest (FLD2006-04022) 043-003.100 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2 PROPOSED CONDITIONS Runoff Site Weighted Surface Area Coef£ Area Coeff. Buildings = 12,550 SF * 0.95 / 41,992 SF = 0.299 Paving = 24,553 SF * 0.95 / 41,992 SF = 0.555 Pond = 0 SF * 1.00 / 41,992 SF = 0.000 Pervious = 4.889 SF * 0.20 / 41,992 SF = 0.023 41,992 SF Proposed Runoff Coefficient (Cpost) = 0.877 RATIONAL METHOD: Q = (Cpost - Cpre) * i * A Q - Runoff Rate (cfs) Delta C = Difference in Post- and Pre- Developed Coefficients i = Rainfall Amount (4 inches for 50 year rainfall event) A= Basin Area (acres) Q = (0.877 - 0.888) * ( 4 inches) * (41,992 SF / 43560 SF) Q = - 0.0423 cfs STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED: Attenuation Volume = Q * 1 hour * 3600 seconds per hour = - 0.0423 * 3600 = - 152.44 CF In this case, since the paving area is being reduced, Delta C value is negative, resulting in a negative Q value. Hence, no increase in runoff will result and NO ATTENUATION is required. If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call. Sincerely, LA Civil,(ry ?eate r• A;?'tEi rization # 8766) :q .f, CO Scott Lirk'-61 ' . (D?e: 06/27/06) President ? ?.r ,,,,,, CC: John Atanasio, Alba Consulting ALBA Consulting Corp. June 8, 2006 Licensed Real Estate Broker Bennett Elbo Traffic Operations Division c/o John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS Proposed CarQuest (043-003) FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Elbo: "It is agreed that in the event that on street parking spaces are removed for any reason by the City of Clearwater, the owner will not seek compensation of any kind". ORI GINAL. cerely, RECEMD Jo ,. n Atanasio, President JUN 0 8 2006 Alba Consulting Agent for Owner PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY CAE CL.EARWATER State of Florida County of Pinellas The following instrument was acknowledged before me this 8th day of June, 2006 y John Atanasio who is personally known to me Notary Signature DIANE M. ATANASIO MY COMMISSION t DD 520302 =? <= EXPIRES: April 7, 2010 BorMedThruNcWYPM6rt 1420 Court Street • Clearwater, Florida 33756 • (727) 443-0718 Fax (727) 447-2369 Shopping Center Professionals Management* Leasing • Sales Sep 14 05 04:07p Copley Design Associates 727-785-4017 p.3 { Pro Values. The landsc 1pereatment proposed in the Comprehensi ndscape Program will have beneficial mpact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. _ The Landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically plea?inq vie?+rs while providing climate control for building and parking areas. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is tocated. Please return checklist for review and verification. 6. That (11we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru 7r t. 17 Ganz t' ftr ow pr rty owner STATE OF FLORIDA., COUNTY of PMELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissio^drby? the l w of the State of Florida. personally appeared oeposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that h?J S / My Commission Expires: S: application formsidevelopment reviewicomprehensive landscape program application.doc day of b ina been first duly sworn Notary Public Michael B. Steeves Commission #DD258944 o? Expires: Oct 17, 2007 '1, OF FV,,, Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 82006 Page 3 of 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C17Y OF CLEARWATER w 7--7 -YVYPM ORIGINAL PECUVED 0 JUN 2006`, ^ PLANNING EPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a. ___ . ? WEEKDAY WEEKEND TYPE OF USE MIN PARKING REQD SQUARE FTG MINIMUM REQ'D Night ° -Night : Day Midnights Midnight . 9 a.m. - 6 a.m., j 6 a.m. 4 p.m. F Day Evenings 9 a.m. - 6 pm. - 4 p.m. midnight, Evening 6 p.m. - midnight Day 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 1 Day ; 9 a.m 4 p.m. tt Evening jEvening 6 P.m jj 6 p m. -' midnight ,midnight 5% l OQ% . ;I 70% 100% 90°loir „ 100% 100% 100% 70°/a i 100% Retail Sales 5 9000 45 2.25 31.50 40.50 E:7?- 45.00 311`550 " Vehicle Sales/Rental 2.5 3397 8.4925 8.48 8.49 [ 8 48 8.49 4 totals 12397 53 40 '49 53 • 0 CAR QUEST @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EASTERN ISOfFET(COMAMDVG 41,997SFMOL)OFTHATPROPERTYDES EDAS FOLLOWS PER O.R. N32, M 31& FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE HE IN OP SECTION 1&ToW sinr N SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN 599.4055"E ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERUNE OF SAID SECTION 19, 3457 FEET TO'IIIE CENTERLINE FOR KHMER AVE, THENCE N I'01R8" E, ALONG THECFh'GRIA'E OF KRMER AVENUE 33083 FEET TO THE SOUTH LME OF GULF TO BAY ACRES FWSF ADDMM M RECORDED IN T HE PUT BOOK 52, PAGE FS OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINFLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA;THE NCEN 89.41'19'W, ALONG THESOUTH IA'EOF SAIDGNFTOBAY ACRENFBCtt ADDITION,32450FFM,T CES1V2'13•W,330R2FEHTTDTH MP OFBECINNWGI THE SOUTH S0. W FEET AND TILE FAST 10.00 FELT FOR ll?E ROAD NGM4F-WAY. PROJECT CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERSPLANNERS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LA CIVIL COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES 1446000RTSTREET 1666 LANEY DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34653 PHONE 7274469000 PHONE: 727-787.2840 SURVEYORS: ARCHITECTS: CORNERSTONE ENG. & SURVEYING, INC, (TO BE DETERMINED) 2433 GULF TO BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER, FIARIDA 34625 PHONE: (727) 799.1763 FAX: (727) 799-1764 LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES POWER: GAS PROGRESS ENERGY CLEARWATER GAS SYSTEMS 2166 PALMETTO STREET,BLDGF 400 MYRTLE AVEN CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 37765 CLEARWATFR,FL 74615 CONTACT: CRAIG KOPKAU CONTACT: TOM ROBERTSON PHONE: (727) 562.5660 WATER: TELEPHONE CIO C1EARWATER VERPAN 100 SOUTH MYTREE AVE 1280 EAST CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER, FL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 37755 PHONE 727-5624600 CONTACT: DAN FARMER PHONE:(727) 562-1165 CABLE CONTACT: BOB CARN BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS, LLC PHONE:(727) 562-1126 2530 DREW ST CLEARWATER, FL 33515 CONTACT: CHRIS MG HTENGALE SEWER: CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 SOUTH MYTRIEAVE CLEARWATER, FL PHONE: 727.5624600 R A {, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 16 E 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD , CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CAR QUEST ALBA CONSULTING CORP CONTACT : JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 34756 PHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727-447-2369 PREPARED BY: 1 ! V!L Lincoln Associates Civil Engineering Group, Inc Certificate of Authorization # 00008766 Scott Lincoln, P.E. Fl Reg # 50035 1446 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: 727-446-9000 FAX: 727-446-9050 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PLAN SET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. BOUNDARY SURVEY 3. SITE PLAN 4. PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 5. BUILDING ELEVATIONS 6. INTERIOR GREEN PLAN Lt. LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT SITE DATA PROPERTY LOCATION: (PARCEL IDR 18/29/16/00000/130/0400) 3430GNFTOBAY (NWCOKNEROFGUSFTOMY6110AB71AVq GIFMWATER PI'EDAS [OUNTY,FIDAU.A PROPERTY OWNER: ALANR0PHD3;RAIPHROPNM aCEUABEIEC16C109YLMNEN q AIBA CONSULTING CORP. HOHN ATANASIO, PRESIDENT) 1410 COURTSTRFET,CIPARWATERFLORIDA27366147 PROPERTY ZONING: SITEIS PRETENRY ZONED:C(WMSBI3CU14 BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: STANDARD REQUIRED PROVIDEDASM-RENEN-INTQL FROM IKLNEiH 35...... 29PVHT 23.1'10 BLDG (EXISTMG)A ISTOPAVEt4NT FROM(SHELEY): 25'TOBLIIG&UPVMT 6249'TOBIDG(EXISDNG)R9.9PTO-PAYEKENT 31 OR(WFST.CORD,4RCIAL) I0T0 BuruTwo 24.89' To LOG, IDIISTENG) SIDE (SOUTH CU.1 U'TOBUHDING 267' 10 BLDG(6KISTMG ENTERPRISE RENT-A ) MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: ALLOWW: V PROrosEO: 2r MA1 M FAR / : A9? ALLO COMMERCALFAR Mows : IL55 ass mGPOSm n29a2 COMMERCIALLSR ALLOwED:0.m ' vaOPoSE?: n9R95 PARKING SPACES: lL J(?/ ?24 7'?n RE OU6i' REQUIRED:S)SPAM PER HX1(9)ANGOOSF(6I0a RFRETA ELE.).3U PROVED:I7)PARALLEL- 1SPACE(ONSTR•165PACESACES( ONS2[E) PROVIDED :l31 PARALLEL5PACES(ONSIRFED ENTERPRISE REQUIRED: 23PEAI, 0 SF(3J91SFCARREMALDMPUYARFA)•9SPACE9 PRONGED (D)STANDARDSPACES COVERAGE: (EXISTING: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) BWDINGAREA(CARQUES) 9DW SF 21,13% BNLDING AREA `ENTERPRISE) 1555 SF 7.99% VEHICULAR USE AREA NIIACAII QUEST) 13,01 SF 3239% VEHICULAR USE AREA MREAPR6q 15,684 SF 37,11% SmEwAIR RC 2F o% TOTAL DAPFRVIOUS 41.640 ST 99.11% DRYREIFNTIONPOND PERUIEIER GREEN RSE 3VEF 0% 0.95% INFERIOR GREEN SPACE Off ax TOTALPERVIWS OSF 0.95% TOTAL SITE ARU 4LW7 SF I..OM COVERAGE: (PROPOSED: ON DEVEL OPMENT` SITE) BUILDING AREA (CAR QUID) 9105E 21.43% 9HILONG AREA"WERN""') 33555F 1.99% VEHINLARUSE AREA(VUAGARQUESO 9,065SF 21.39% V11RUSEARFA(ENTERPR6q '6';.SF 39.01% SHHWALR OSF 0% TOTALIRR'FRVIOUR 37,9195E 90.5% DRYRETENTIONPOND UIWSF 239% PE311METERGRFEN 2.M9 EF 5.12% INTEATORGREEN SPACE(I4'AWAAWDI 94056>9013FRFA 'p 214%(10.31%OFVUA) TIDAL PERVIOUS 4.179 SF 9.93% TOTALEMAREA 41.9915E IOnW'A NOTE TOTALSDE AREAFORURODUT522.-EF FLOOD ZONE DATA: F.E.MA ZONE - X". PER FRIM MAP PANEL NO. 1m W17D(0215,91) CAR QUEST ® GULF TO BAY BLVD. LA CIVIL TOB # 043-003 541 O O 0?8 ?i W ua P4 0 C 0 U m a Aw z9 SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES Jvv FIRST ADDITION / PLAT BOO 52, PAGE 55 60'RIGBT-OF•WAY __-_-_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SBELLEYSTRE 3` ----:ARrv-I------------ ------------ c N89°41'18"W 32450' NC. CATCH ROSIN o ? 0 ro MIS C /As- _ r e„3g 0 e 3 N) N O O N F.I:GAL, DEFCRIPIT(IN:. FRONT 3'F[E. SW (:ORNk:R OF'THt; NE; VA 0}' Sk;C.'IiON 18, fOWNNiEP 24 SOLTH, RANGE 16 FAST. RUNS 89 °;0.55" FAST. Al.(hNC, Tf1E EASE-NM5F CE: "[FN LINE OF SAID SECTION 13. ZW-0 Fr. TON P.{),H.; TI{ENi:F. CONI'INI }:589' dl' 55" F_4SI',ALONG THE EA$F- W'[8T' (X`rF.R LINE OF SAID ECTION 1& 32-1.5' FT. TO THE CENTER LINE OF KIIMER, AVE TRENCI. N I OT2B"FAST, AW\C THE E171R IINE 0E K I I m2Eft 1VE 7+703 FF. TO IIfE SOLTH LINE Of GULF TOBAY ACRES FTPSI ADDff ION AS RECORDER € FLA* ROOF 2.PAGE 5 Of THE. PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEIL45 COLWIY If URIDA TIOiNCE A) 41'19" WESTALONGTHF. SOLI 14 UN , 1, OF SAID (ail I fO BAY ACRES FIRT ADIH DON. 124.50 FT.; 'Tf[1`02' 13-14'FS}'.3?0.0: FT'. 7X) T TE. P.O.R €:FSS Tf(k; SY3LI1150.0 FT. AND THE, FAST30A FT. FOR ROAD RK;Frr- }F'-WAY. 0 N N8 41'18"W 29450' Aem //'} xmxmrm.wAu stxAw urasw? ?TRASx ARE.ACnrorx. "A My 4v 0-v v rl I $ ONE STORY i Bclwn LnixmRE MASONRY Y usv Aem D@T cox[ o re N 3 0p4? y ?? 0 N A o S.? S P4-KG If-SI i s' 6- wv 1 fmv f v 7"'1v n OMV 1 Im.m / ONE S. 8 STORY R MASONRY CBS ONE STORY MASONRY slavw DCv wATm vu rWNC SIDEwuR sn lrs•uRRxiu 91* ONE f STORY MASONRY CBS NW-UN UNEfFNCE talc All ?AATrAEemTs s r IRN 16ID pus ur Ie. Aur „ 1 ?1Iq? ve a v o I u ??ul I I I I ?-'- e }J ruwroccueATIG- wglfxv.u.re •l ? uFC.eaY uexr ea.Eb ??? Q t S89°40'55"E 29457'n--7.,?.T-aArPr,vuve .A V! , 7 n WOW FD )SAr • COv. CONC. S. 89° 40' 55" E. "EE"bIP"5 _ _ _ EAST-WEST CENTER LINE OF S. 89° 40'5511 E. 321.57' _ _ x SSW CORNER OF THE SEC. 18,TWP.29S.,RGE.16E. - P.033. - - W GULFTOBAYROULE-- NE 1/4 OF SEC. 18, TWP. 29 S., RGE.16 E. o 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY wp .2 Ia 00 "ORDINGTOFLRMN125096-012SG i _?? Im RGN I E.emTI I IW ?IW3 :1¢0 <I iN C.1 ?I I??GG a I 30 0 30 60 Scale- I' = 30' 11 h 0 ?BACI:fI.OW @;vICE VI LESS THE EAST 30' I C I C 2-D I W n I? I° RBI wN GVY s•v^cx ' a I ,II I JUN 08 PLANNING DEI CITY OF CLEI FL DIANE. X , A TYPEOFSHRVEY: i•WDOR DOiJADARI USE DETIGN min DATED: 9-3-03 ASSOCIATES, H INC. sd"ix°-n?wneuosm, iarun orciuma¢ m•nAT SIGNATURE: LA PENNY AVENUE OR NI •RUa NO UNDERGROUND INSFALIwTONSENPROVGOMSHAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPTASNOTED EAS60FFD106EARN'GS: ADDRESS: SEMI OL,AVENUE 33778 FGN •snanOnFTnNnlanRVS n`2- XARN HO •rnnABnSn NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY. AND'OR OWNEBSIHP EAST RIGHT-0F.WAYLDR LAURENRPENNY R.LSg4931 $EMINOL&FIAR1DA 33718 ,M"per. 2430CULFTOBAYBOULEVARD JOB N0.06-0447 RM vsueBU:v. m-uuvurze WERE FURN6aEDTOTHIS SURVEVEEXCEPT AS NOTED AnM1RSHOWN. xLdICRAVLNUE CLEARWATE FLORIDA DATE: 4/I92006 PHONE: (137)39&4360 1m •Dermn BEING: N. DI'%%WU^E FAX: (727)31%051 NmvALm LICENSED BUSINESS 06539 CERTIFY TO: ROPHIE FANHLY PARTNERSHIP 1 ALBA CONSULTING CORPORATION DRAWN BY: LPILL SIGNmasEAL® ? 1GNif°'? M, RW+HDaNe.ANK PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE COMMITMENT POLICY 0, 50' 100' SITE SHELLY ST STORMWATER e SCALE: 1" = 50' TREATMENT 6° VERTICAL SW ALE SOUTH LINE OF GL'LF'1'0 RAY ACRES CURBING 4' 4' 3' T 8' 2' 13' EIRSTADDITION N PARKING PLAT ROOK 52 PAGE.55 _ _ 4 GRASS R/W STRIP PARALLEL PARKING rv?r 4 WHEEL _ _ ??r? z?zrU t?r?? - - - - SINGLE FANYLY RESIDENTIAL - - STOP APPROXIMATE R/W LINE T- \\%/\\%? I' DEEP WATER QUALITY l??ivv%v?ivv/ \ viuvv?ivv-??i SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR FLUME f PROPOSED (5) ONSTRE T PARKING SPAS NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. PROP ED PEDESTRIAN R M 1 66'2IG9T-OF-;K4 SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 \\ \\ / LANDING PER GRY OF CLEARWATER ???? n.v,mxunmvmm A IND X 109, AND FOOT INDEX 304 (TYP) ENCLOSURE DOMPSTER 1-"(NTS) (PER GANDARDS) SECTION A-A N89°41'18"W 32450' ME (TYP) rvese ^o? ? 4 n II N go z a y A I u y F n-z a e° e sovrsma8 U A ru - T -"r- - ---------- ?- ? - ?/ - --- -- - 1 ---'---;C5 IGHT ?..\ ----- nv,i(r 6" TICAL NGLE PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE jN 9°41'18" 294.50' m 5 CURB (TYP) 2 = PSx " SITE LEGEND HANDICAP PARKING (El PROPOSED DRAINAGE INLET PROPOSED CURB SITE BOUNDARY LINE - - - CENTER LINE OF ROAD --- RIGHT-OF-WAY - -- EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - PROPOSED CONCRETE TYPICAL TYP HANDICAP HC # PARKING SPACES SIDEWALK S/W 5' RADIUS R5' LINEAR FEET LF SQUARE FEET SF GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6" VERTICAL CURBING. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. 2. THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET NFPA 30 A REQUIREMENTS FOR REPAIR GARAGE 2000 EDITION. 4. APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERED SPRAY BOOTH SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. NO CUSTOMER ACCESSABLE PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE BUILDING. J, I ANDSCAPE o x 4/ '? , Z cn. WuL ,(r; I' aro BUFFER H r7 b4.;+$ t, 11 /s"r '_---- I , L l h` rc N__ EXISTING IATO CARE sx nxeA rr°": , r - FIRE II Q BUILDING USE DATA FLUME (TYP) 12,7 J ' I YDRANT „ nn[ I I z a°1'? SIDEWALK - 23 ? O srna5 a ev J, d BUILDING COMPONENT AREA SF I! tiW nv a r - RETAIL /PARTS 6,000 SF ces i I O ?- i I I O / I. 1 I m 8, a GREEN. 24. `- I 1 i I b ''1:6 V WAREHOUSE /STORAGE 3.000 SF w I m? / n ?I TOTAL = 9,000 SF w SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS a r CI`j E' FOR STORE FRONT U 8' } SI0 EWALI( I e 15' S1 J PARKING DATA N _Ma _r ,I?Y?. CARQUEST 5'S <? Ixr -nr 1- 25.52' 6,000 SF oLL y ONSITE: DRIVEG € RETAIL AREA a zm ; III Q 45' ANGLED SPACES: 9 aan,m,<cs AISLE " ! U PARALLEL SPACES: 6 « rx1 ' vl 9' a+x w+ I r W sTy PARALLEL H/C SPACES: 1 ° I I 6. n a c°mnr EXISTING _ a MISING_WALL W n N D3 _,_S'L°••l = DE= ' f_== 113E _ < Q ONSTREET: ) Z co-y wI ?IIVI ?w PARALLEL SPACES: 7 z: 3,000 SF •10 ' D a;: C ` = F < Y TOTAL SPACES: 23 STORAGE AREA r p 1 11 LU z ° I J O: in'.? PROPOSED 30 SF TENANT CW Tr II ?IIr z N SIGN LEGEND N }? _? n;iY pxx 4uui A.Iv - T ° ., SIGN ON WALL _-ra- 'yin. r_ '? il?. a Hm 0 5r- NO TEXT OR SYMBOL SIZE - s= i D <w Q oxs x? - { Q d$ R1-1 STOP 30"x30" .• sTOm _ ' I I a R3-1 NO RIGHT TURN 24"x24" I Nw °s axa xl I- +L.ti-+onxr "I1 M, 2292',,.. 1•`'•-vcu5sn"51ce vWi m R3-7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30"00" w co'. a R5-1 DO NOT ENTER 30"x30" RETAIL SHOPS q v) `°"' ; I v R6-1 ONE WAY 36"x12' ONE Q a °`11L E n_r °+ x1 PROPOSED 1(2) ONSTREET A"- - IRKI IG S ACES R3-5R RIGHT TURN ONLY 24"x24" II „,, ( ?r ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON If Cris :I pQ Izo c" Lx;:Mr II LL UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. I o rc c I J a U ?a ¢mmsmnwsmmmm = O I I a,.uiroYS - I LL"SS TIIE EAST 30' I'- ENTERPRISE 2'; C7 0 STRIPING NOTESr` 4r RENT-A-CAR PROPOSED S' °i G LANDSCAPE BUFFER e -4 B I n I i O U. i 1z 1. TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED 2064 N'o 'a n PROPOSED 5 WIDE M OC iq I CONCRETE SIDEWALK N W WITH A 4" WHITE STRIPE. f- 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. I ?`Rr II, a c4?' a -.?-- --'o- lI --kpASH D UNE DEPICTS n I 3 ," a , 3,597 SF OF ENTERPRISE r I' ,.YyEHIC DISPLAY AREA W 7 P.q.VC:.l: h'1C nLYx B t.. /?01'V"?.' 7 I I I- J 31 uFxnY W ?, SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY NOTES_ API Am. T. GCtS • LOT LINE klY BOY ®. WA11A,A k ? :: e LOT LINE 44.57' i LOT LINE 100' W 1 50 a w;ace, r r? r.ir .nL 89°40'55"E 294.57' rz ~+ ,r - tr4^I:.nar td; ?"•,•• uoanu,M1 '`\\i 1. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT IMWiZ •5, ?,r.-crxna y y xss ra( ' TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE -- _____=_=:.3'---- ' ----mot--- --------- -2_L_-?sz r?-- _ r.-- ---" ::,: ?T' x ------ C? DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH „,ACeP.? a mnnnx; m"n; xc u'nra nrct> _ . 42.75' DRIVEWAY - 6242 DRIVEWAY \ V PROPOSED ER CRYR E OF CLA WATE CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT 144.8' DRIVEWAY LANDING i INDEX 109, AND FOOT INDEX 304 SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX #109, -- -- ----- o INCLUDING THE A.D.A. (TRUNCATED DOMES PER EXISTING D.O.T. INDEX #304.) PEDESTRIAN RAMP V 2.ANY NEW OR REPLACED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY _ GULF TO BAY BLVD__? OM ? -WAY -Il RIVI APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE •30'S{"E 37A57'------ ---- o? R?GF,7-0F z 6L•a O E b L7 u8 wS „? ma_v'oyay Ha'nLLY ??wsN 'H e 8. .4u Z a J a W H 7G RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" THICK P.O.R. (Fj FIBROUS CONCRETE, AND A MINIMUM 3000 PSI ------- J, ,? -- W 1- - _...__......._._.__..._ y0 a W a WTH 6" X 6" / 10 X 10 W.W.M. [SIDEWALKS - - - - - - - ---- __.. ...... _. .......... .................... __ ..................... . -........ APRON AREA(S)]. REFER TO CITY OF --- w? -- --.... ..._......._.. __............ ..... ..__....... ..._..-. --....... .....-- SHALL NOT TO BE THIS APRON AREA(S)]. R FER T EC ITY OF NIS AND -- --- a ? -' _JUN 0 p 2006- R I ? ? STANDARDS INDEX #103. _ ................. ..... -_......... ......... __.. -. SHEET NO. PLANNING DEmrAAiGiEN n J eni n[ r1 [ A MAIAILD SITE 6' VERTICAL CURBING PARKING -WHEEL STOP STORMWATER TREATMENT SWALE 4' 3 4 SHELLY ST q 0' 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' SOUTH LINE OF GULP TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION PLAT BOOR 52, PAGE 55 GRASS R/W STRIP PARALLEL PARKING Z//Z,% J 17I117U ZVZ1?171 - - SINGLE FANLY RESIDENTIAL - - APPROXIMATE R/W LINE .m FLUMES I (N TS) SECTION A-A PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS THE PROPOSED STROMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE IS DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 INCH RUNOFF FROM THE SHADED PRKING AREA TO BE RESURFACED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT: PARKING AREA = 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME = (0.5 INCHES / 12 INCHES PER FT) 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME = 211 CF OF STORAGE REQUIRED NO ATTENUATION VOLUME IS REQUIRED SINCE THE IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDUCED BASED ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED SWALE CAPACITY: VOLUME = ( 818 SF(TOP) + 0 SF (BOT) 2 " 1' DEEP = 409 CF GRADING LEGEND ELEVATION EL TYPICAL TYP CLEANOUT CO INVERT ELEVATION IE HANDICAP HC EXISTING ELEVATION p PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION -? DRAINAGE INLET Ell MITERED END SECTION D PROPOSED SWALE STORMWATER FLOW EXISTING SWALE STORMWATER FLOW ?+r PROPOSED VALLEY FLOW -C SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW DIRECTION OF STORM WATER FLOW STORM DRAIN SO HELICALLY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE HCAP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ERCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFE SIDEWALK S/W STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 5-50 EROSION CONTROL - -- PROPOSED HIGH POINT ---- SHELLY ST T;f'4I N89°4t't8°W 324.50' _AI,YY -------------- ertusx ?, ;:I%h'c <.rnrto' ! \ c c:'as* Eu.r=c.YRnrn ? I? OI,Ji / (N 89°41'18"R' 294.50' ( m.ra^ax..'a "\P / ? lSOT ?641ha LTE}E.'CE/ 1' I ? ? ?,; ? / , A // II ? Q I ILtiN(0. G l 1.1.' ,I j // .s II A TO Z THE 5,060 SF AREA SHADED HEREON rZ,A, AREAMCUr? !AUTO CARS J ° n WILL BE RESURFACED AND GRADED x TO:DRAIN TOWARD THE PROPOSE, II u ?:y?y? I " STOR'MWATER SWALE FOR'TREATMENT o+'E z e3 / I srcw, ? a °M? 2'I ? p,Awt' _ MW v? I' xCU,I?I::r?.- 11,1(6\RV ? LL CAS m Q w„' 1 w I ? i I U / i ? .•I II <r,,? ,lt CARQUEST ;4 ! I` 5?AxAl.,4lT.E ? ?W,. MT. WI li I c?) WORV " I -------- ._ cis --- i a 3 I z oo- W. V' _j z: JI ?i °? -', - "' ACG---_.? ti YF. ! STORY O STORY .11ASUNRY (n alAi77NR1' 1 l/1 W W U uJi I cone R? TAIL SHOPS I , I 0.1 E G r'IXF. :: f 111 CAS i o o: :h\ afp `•rrxnlnSarM n;t r.:x+c srert I ENTERPRISE - ?? I I II RENT A C AR I •I III c a v =.. 90.AYt ax.1C.:5 _ _ _ c _ _ _ = I e - cttt .(S I F`?i11 i ??JUUf.,i1l?NAL51l-!':AflA I'. n a fl ? 5 'sJ.-E:f.;: ear cA1ER 1'ni'•E,` 'y; w'h;Ex;AL,T uumwl ','+ A ;po'A'rccrv r'?INE 44 57'j. LOT L', LOT LINE 44.57 _LOT LINE 100_ LOT LINE 150' wA,?a'? aa^?,, •Lr smr;r?;ln.'+.?: ?ra.E¢-r.rxnofs ?? S89°40'55"E 194.57''''1 r---i•"l-•• _ ?•t;"uc., dru::r_u niiaYi 1W: ._-_----_-- ._-'A---- - _ ----__. '?NhrEP. VF]FSS? - - - SvAI:k ASf?l'YS '1 . , swrhar xEAnimEE \ "'tki. NISWN'I' I ? _ 37A57' GULF TOCH BA? BLVD 100'RI T-01 IA S. 5P R. - P.O.B. ---------------- Il I I h i43, II I I? I I II II III L u:; ? I zl?, l III?,I "`o < 1 w LAJ, W ;z. I a CC Z3 JI, zcn I i c a? II I j I a aW ?I-Sl,cxvl,?we?,IcE h v II I I iI BLESS THE EAST 30' II I o o"I II II r_ :I I I'?• I \ ----- RECENEDF ------- JUN 08 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT O h Q Q N o , a:s z e 0. N Q U y m z Q w c m r < °° suolslAay U 0 w 8 z Z ok 0 ? e O a a g s N P mm CD m e n V W o "om US ^o J ?9uoa N w oNV: O .]U ; -Ua ? Z MQ W J O a F.. W C7 Q J a Z C7 0 °C J ? LL W Q F Z Co V LJJ Z V I a H _:i M R?.?' kA15"F aF v,F SHEET No. 4 BLUE WALL PAN CARQUEST CARQUEST B BLUE WALL PAN CARQUEST CARQUESTI O 4 R V N 87S a z PANELS y v? o U N y 0 F - z C ,m c SUOiSIA2U U Q iy RED a? Z a BLUE Z O ee F- Q 0 c Q. 2 0 o m? V @g ? cm m U'c n o ca ?ONav Z ? !I au_u 1. a Q < f? m 0 UL = c CD 0 C7 o Q O LL M oc W ORIGINAL N Q a ? c RECEIVED Lu co -j JUN 0 82006 Lu O° a PLANNING DEPARTMENT °C CITY Of CLEARWATER U 11 H U F WW WW aH W[-? SHEET No. 5 EAST BUILDING ELEVATION WEST BUILDING ELEVATION NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION CITY OF CLEARWATER Ah r r-J GENERALLAND5CAPE NOTE5 g SOUTH LINE. OF GULF TO BAY ACRES d FIRST ADDITION I. AI plant mat-15 shall be Florida t I or better and installed to highest nursery standards. Plants shall be PLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 55 heal y, free of pest and disease 2. All plants shall be eonGlner grown incept as noted a plan. 3. NI palms and trees shall have straight tinnb wth no Assts, knotting a other defective characteristics. ` SINGLE FAIALY IRESIDENTIAL - - - 4. Mulch shall be 100% Pine Bar, installed to a minimum thickness of 2'. 5. Sod shall be 95%aeed free 5t. Augustns'Plontimr, installed mth tight joints. -F- - - APPROXIMATE R/W LINE - - G. All dimensions shall be held checked by the landeaps Contractor prior to construction wth any d A d r her screpanmes reporte to the Undsape rchitect. ,£ 7. NI materab shall be as Specified on the plans. If materials, labor or installation techniques do not adhere 6 SHELLY ST to the speolla 5, they wll be rejected by the landscape Ardidect wed slawfied mal is arid installation amed out by the la d cape Contractor at no additional cost. S p° / 60 R]GIIT-OF )'Y.9 P B. No substitubons of materials or changes to the dnwngs or spaafxations shall be made. / - 9. AI required P-1:5 are to be provided by the installing contractor Unless Specifically stated otheru,e in / as urxal.ren,ewerr {1 I the sped-t-,. - - - -/ - - - - _ - - 10. Contractor Idenbfiaton signs shall not be allowed on the project. / J'f 'n*t'n n;Stu 3 3 (,..,- • '' 50 I. Contractor shall be responsible for all Items as shown or described on this plan and Specifications. N 89°41'18" W 324,50' / / I l JA .? PO - I SreP3at 12. AI proposed bndsape and sod areas containing turf a weeds shall be treated wth'Paund-up per ` ----- -s--- c------- oar -_.. / manufacturer s bpenfiat-s. - - - - - -c ? - - - - - - - - - - ? _ _ --_ _ _ _ ? - - _ ._ 7 - 13. Wdsapc Contractor shall provide all necessary site preparation required to wady the ste for Planting as asu"A a1R(' / +sPaut) \ -' ' / i - - - - specdied. o` - SI b. j / \ Cars? y // 14. The landscape Contractor shall warranty and guarantee all matenab and Labor for a period of 90 days for 'a l N 89°4178" W 29450' 30 mi \ shru and groundcova, pakm and trees. Warranty and guarantee period shall begin upon date of completion. axx.rOw oE,rw' ?? y \ ?-- ?- O r A ... ' ,I % / "ammr I m*a 15 AI rep aim an1Ja replacements shall be made by the landscape Contactor wtllm 10 working days upon notfiatwnof any deh-oas by the owner or their representative. IG Al gtesbom regarding the Landscape Plans and 5peofui trim shall be d-ted to the Landscape Achdect at (727) 787.2840. 'tea }p , aCN.V4 A KiE4CE II B 0 p ?, '?51r m err m q JRgB =3 IIIGIICJn'C WT.I g A rk-) 200 FERTILIZATION 53 9 , , rv , . I y, wM 0 3 A TO Z w ` '10wv E? q T ins -FSn AREA(. •mSC. `• ` ' 5hrub5 and Trees IY ?ALITO CARE ` I 1 ost %ICB 14 .. I I Al Geer and Shrubs shat be Fertilized wstli'Agnfomf 20.15.5 Planting tablets at time of planting and pier to , UA PJ ZB installation of plant pt bxkhtl. Tablets shall be placed umlamtyuaurd BIC root ball at a depth that is between IswE Z ep`` ? L 45 ' ( the middle and bottom of the root ball. smRy 0 itASOYRY o. V I M ;. c T 40 arc oat I J TJN l 2? ' I I t 75 Application Rate 4 MiA.;IN\FENCE . CBS > I00 - 11 ?p 2? grim t. rc 9 G'la C 2 G M ti , avr uk I on : - t i i m UAG eery m 5 Galin Cardarna: 3.21 grim ableb . UA 7Gallon Container: 4.21 grim tablets .l S / .. I . j 5 C 0 W yd cc F- area: 3 tablets per each I12' caliper of trunk w I1 I ua 32 NIB 'i ; I ti ZFU 20 ?J Q A C F Q q ?j Groundcover Area5 AI ground-areas shall receive ferturat- vnth'OmwcMe'lime release feroliaa Per manufacturer, V i Ito I I ! ?' Ql ?u N Q Q specifiatiom. PARKI , NG SPACES CARQUEST -. 15 I I Z _ w Co a -- --- - j II MG L II U U (D I o o P.ihCI.Nr SPACEi d one S•'rORY f ooJ II _ W ' I? O LU Z Z O Z Sri tin al3 rrcear:pb,c d "maaw?s err ' e I " II 2 MASONRY " I W ° i UA W ` U gafm eara,9 umw I; w T Z °1 > 3 ZFU w r ?' 3 ,se 14 Y Pan 3' errs w gg H I J •-- I . ?. CI QY a L4 p[4+ bHeejt 34 pt p°Y b «a N F o I o = 20 o, sarcrw uma I a?m G I4 <? WI ?r , CC U <?? "asv W >.'L o 1 A( ew}nn I-I J i Z N n TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREE PROTECTION DETAIL J Ica LL ^, P DYA(.'rs \ Y s ~ O L /a € -fir .-? ?? ' , ?,? II >o cm W r u 61 ? I I ?•.cnc?.wrsP' STO"v II isc ;c (n - MASONRY l J I iuC, ' .lW ?---I. d, DE'.'YF. W W 3 Aroabar i?P ' ? I(1 Q R TAIL SHOPS i W (a3 1 ?QY, P I O N :l CONC 73 •I I I I m • ??^ :5"°` hest, rase ° M v / 1 N U V ONE i Q Q ;FOnr r., lB I' wed - 51'ORl ^ -- l - bgdM1l . ? ) - _ -- rxxvc. _ N > I\ l? I SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL CB I Cgs 0Of • 3 1 I I I GRAIN LINK MW 1, K CD macs-„r ,,, I I , U ?onasn8a RUro 5 e as®q II 1. THE EAST 30' I I1I a+ I ? I ENTERPRIS 3 I J I Plant Mat erlal5 Sche dule a v m ? RENT-A-CAq I; n I I ° Quantity Code BotarnalName Common Name Specification 5pacmg a ---- -- _ IT-__ _,h - I 4G NIB htbl5cu55pp. hibiscus 3 3al., 24" x 24' 3(7' O.C. U d (A Or' = _ _ ".W. C.. _ _ J ® s, 7 ICB Ilex cornuta burfordli Burford holly 3 gal., 24"x 24' 30' o.c. d i { _ ? (J 1 200 TAM Lanatna Slop. Yellow Lantana I gal., 12' ht. x 12' spr. 18' O.C. I n P4xr:rt+u Qn(?(r J err 6 - ? B '' ,?' co I 9 L I U er5troemta mdlea Cra e Myrtle 10' ht. x 5' s pr, cal. 9 p ?' -J I I . i c I I 45 LMM Li-tope Muscan Aztec Grass I gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr. 18' O.C. B 130 -MG Unope Muscan Giant bnope I gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr. 18• O.C. f?(ua cu;ov.atstnlm Wis. ' r.-i ntx•CgexnoN+rsxa' f. ? x 125 50 JP POM Jumperu5 parsons Podorarpus 5pp. Parson's Juniper 3 gal., 12" ht. x 18" spr. 30" O.C. Podoearpus 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spy. 30" c.c. C A WAT , ALVS. LOT LINE 44 57 LOT LIN O' P FOX li''u . LOT LINE 150' \ 1 39 00 RI TJV Ra Mole Is Indhca Trachelospermum Indian hawthorn 3 al., 18ht , x 18" spy. 30" o.c. asmmoidies V f C d J " D . _ • - - ? 4 J ar. on erate e asmine gal., 18 spr. 30 o.c. 3 ht x IS EanJ( ,-FUf.p. -=-- waams ?plp i $89°40'5 -- --- -? 5"E 294.51 - stP.rGVxfAMmr i'aA9 b colic, s•+s^cu \\' 20 7 TJN LA Trachelospermum a Ulm l s t 51aticurn Dwarf Confederate Jasmine I gal. 6 ht x 12°5pr. 18"o.c. El 12'h 4' " l COPILEYDESIGN ASSOCUrrS,INC. ---- ------ rt__ rke )tuna ) ----y ---- -=?mi?== -- =- _. .. - -----' ----- 8 ZFU u a a a m Z f f m t.x ca . 5pr' 2.5 C db d P l " " " LANDSCAPE wn v.vtrnas vt+.01.r wnr_RaE(n 1 , a a ur uracea ar oar a m 7 gal., 30 x 30 3G o.e. ARCHITECTS cnn;4 n41er 1666 Laney Drive i;n6lnnaeNT N Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727787-2840 Fu 727 7854017 GULF TO BAY B / LVD r 0 P 25' 50' 100' Landscape Architecture Site Planning Contract Administration _ -- S.T°40'55"E, 32TZT ------------100'RIGHT-OF-IVAY ' ? - - .... - - -- -._ - - - - - --?-' - - - •uns,urve? um - -? - JOB NO. 25077 ----- ----- --- - ? ----- ---_- ---- Scale 1" = 50'-0" SHEET L E ? ?jJ 5 Check list for CDB Agenda & Application sent to City Clerks Office FLD2006-04022 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd INITIALS Application Form Parcel ID v Letter of Authorization Survey or Legal Description Copt/ of 400 scale Zoning Atlas with property outlined and 500' radius hand drawn from outside perimter of site }(? 2 x 2 Map s required for ANX, LUZ & Z LARGE SCALE AMENDMENTS YES o /0 Sherry Watkins 5 f FLD2006-04022 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Date Received: 04/27/2006 CAR QUEST AUTO PARTS ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 290B PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS CLWCoverSheet CASE #7 ? ? ?- o 1 Planning Department (staff initials): RECEIVED r v ' C earwat?r 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 IV DATE RECEIVED: - 7 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 RECENE0 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and APR 2 7 2006 application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ COY OF CLEARWATER xN OTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATTION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: OF'? 1 IE 1 im wy 101W-rWl?S•H1' C`C' ALA ?Lwiw- U/ ; . ?AIG. MAILING ADDRESS: CoArf-T S- 6e-T 331S?2-!?2i2ll PHONE NUMBER: '])'i 443-L)-7/g F NUMBER: ?? I - 2-3(A9 PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed _ S ALA74 kaAliE AGENT NAME: t4Tf+AS/0?( G?t,lf?liJ MAILING ADDRESS: ld?TT ( ?S PHONE NUMBER: ( / 2-7) 443- 0-11 g FAX NUMBER: 2-7 CELL NUMBER: -? E-MAIL ADDRESS: L Co 464 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS ORCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) S V Tanning l' • 0.1= r%N: (Co yeeoction 4-202.A) Y7 PROJECT VALUATION: PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 4 w9q $ /,/) 0nn , u Ii- /"jAf 4S St 4" 3a0 _?'' , 4 s S7 "WC-M A-r Cr-S R&QQ C?YC0 -4-L,0A1G V?6 AI&M )epartment\Application orms\deve, opment review\2006 Forms\Comprehenswe Infill Project ( ) 2006.doc J 6 I A4F'1 r(j!?? jeC_ - Sy-f (,c 4.74-y Qu 1}i(TY 7?Cr9 iC ? A c c&ss ?n c? D :?_C AP) A4 , LJ DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A P EVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO.(if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) I'§ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLIC , EED O THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP Y (see page 7) S ?? EC's E D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section, 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. -T c- f2c,1'ca?c k'Er f? uSE wiLL A. 4 CMM-t -S-r 4u-(o s sr?'O? /,?J' A ,guTo AcrS Les u56S , SIMIL C //y SCfte l IA17&1S'17Y, 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. T &o6bSC'> REVAX- USE AJkL /MA&Le- ?FPS' i/WD Ab OC60 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. -rqE &UPOSC-0 USE WIL(.. I M84VC 0044 , 51 DCWIKS AdD ?4DA ?If? i. The pt esed Zopment is designe to minimize traffic congestion. or ?? `r ???? /S r w f M I-CC&S A-AJ IC- 0-120uC1f-V(014 To 10OZE The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. AcCC S ; Sl ?S , P is in4C pia C? SCr41?'iA1C, II J ¢f6- 01201 0 CIS QOILS f:j;2 - fC Cf?'7Z-,2 ? t4esyu6-Tt- CS ©r? LF-To 0A The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. . rqc c(tS7?A3G BufL?D itK i S V,GlIT if eu C#qT;?> , 'Tfec-ac? W fcL IIA0t f , LC/0<C-C'7u12ft, U l SUE41. ( 0 scm? -b I A410/AJ6VtC--i4-r5 r 4-:70-rAC-1 fe -T4-'C- 11-Ato Alg6 K fl(cZ? -T E XoPe-rL--ry ??s r9-LRMby &-G i CcCA,2g--) OF *04- S w 1 tl AU-60 6i LES -ro te-& L Fb2 2 614 Oc^cu-N --TRC PA.ULOW6. RECEIVED S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006..dooc c? ry ?yC Page 2 of 8 A R 2 A 2006 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CITY OF CLEARWA'IER I? Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: use, intensity, other development standards. ` 6te "tsn wis fAx .Sr 8aI r o fic w-As _Ccs, &uAjerce ?A cf126q 0S"c. tt-W64 CuzeCZ WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) 1. 2 L-D C CRrrcebl - Dip ??? ??CIS?v T, E Plk'665 b k'El r?PMF,I?I ? 0_0M101A[6t.L ,iil • 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 11 0 k c i df c-) :u &A1 -? PPS--r ( t- A Acr u ? <,:? r M t 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ?- k3l ILL PK CA(,,- &u&gr IJJ f t_ l -60 TS' Trs t?olu _ PE 0= M &_6 W I- f Ao T ee-a(L . ,, ulo- ??kr.'S4t CNL gkC- - &NI 0 tArILY KVAf 2 use /,41 7gC- 0, 1 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. T !WOM JAH Cl-(15 l-DC ri - M?vY T?SC- 2fV mu- Au-aA) A4 &-XIS7iA lguiLprAK -75- OCCUR A V1116 4 guE/nk_:-? IAN ?L& QK1n6C IrJC A &7/tr /?d(iEr4TS 720 DOT 14 D C 8. Adeq ate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parkin In the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. ?C ems" &OP86K & o S?f?E r ?0 1??1 e r?? REECEIVED SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc p Page 3 of 8 APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARIMEW CITY OF CLEARWA10 reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the im A0,614-r-01-44 OZO?WrY provements.) B 14AVC ?y • 1f 6-(( Re- DN&tOM64r OeLwZZ . Paeg3r4T & A 4.Af962 LtALUE is - 621 ? Sty AP,4DSi tWLQ b_4 /JL?G?9-SC 141Af -rlNC- 6 MP P 7 ir?tP/La cJC?v1E S The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. (N I S Pab_C-CT U,) ILL19d4 1 E M4! c tX MbJ 644 EATS H ( /^{ W6 oIr TfFE G-ry LM 1-73; 66 A S 4c W C TFf Lam- GULF- 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) j 562F :54.T 4 0-:7 1lI ,,. ?S ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included) 411P-- Zk7 tormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4° or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; (,tuo --raes cN s ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and / condition of such trees;. (,4JV .T?? o? s 17C-? ) LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (le. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RECEIVED SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication FormsWevelopment review12006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006AAPR 2 " 2006 Page 4 of 8 PLANNING DEPAMMEW coy QF CLEARWAIER i 0. G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; V North arrow; V Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; e? All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ?J,A Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; / All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _? All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; V Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _? Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening ? {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); ? Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; V Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _jZ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: J EXISTING Land area in square feet and acres; 4q? [ 7p7 / D' 910 _ REQUIRED ?jPRROPO ED 4 27710-901 Number of EXISTING dwelling units; J ' Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; a? M1 7 Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; 34? On! 11406 Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ - Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. l REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); CA-TIA<460) 0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: 65MC- IS 0 , / (o AC a") ? AA One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ECE! N G® _ Structural overhangs; SAPlanning DepartmentWpplicalion Formsldevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infilt Project (FLO) 2006.doc Page 5 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEAIIWATER H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): V/ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _1L Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required I/ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant L/ schedule; / Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all d existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; LI/ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); %-L Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11); CA'MA696:0/ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; _ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. i 7 EIRV XJJ=® SAPlanning Departmen&Application Formsldevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Agi? p'p 2O0f16 Page 6 of 8 iii 6 PLANNING DEPARIIIM CITY OF CLEARWAM • K.. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) I7 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ¦ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-5624750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. El Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning move drat at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required.amC - V - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. O Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationstwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. ire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. le? CtULALULATIONS/ - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CWATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. of proKrty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELVS Sworn tpoand swbsc .bed before me thisd day of dd , A.D. 20-QAgl,_ to me and/or by q 0 , who is personally known has as M public, ?° ; 1Y111ijtilel ts. steeves commission 4W r Commission #DD258944 i ,r'J.` Bonded TtlrU - - - Atlantic Bondin SAPlanning Department\Hpplication FormsWevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLO) 2006.doc ?' ® Page 7 of 8 APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPAR9MiIKT ....11Y OF CLEARWAM • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ('t-I k [>Pp - i C. ABA : l L5A 1 /tN D Lc' 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: J 1 C7 N Pa iLy Phr2??vSFi IP? 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this personally appeared Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. day of who having been first duly sworn Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 SAPlanning DepartmenMpplication FormsWevelopment revieM2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 8 of 8 PLANNING DEPARIMEM Ciiy OF CLEARWARR Ids/bG/duub 1.3: 44 t.UNtN UULLS I IM 1 N rUK I UU I I L 1 ttJ rG r 44 r ejo7 rta:1 VL US UJ:'Uba Rlba Consviting Corp. (727)4.47-2369 ORIGINAL RECEIVED N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: proviso nar-+?s of air property owners on deed - PRINT full names: Alan A. Rophie Ralph •,A. Rophie Cecilia Betect, -? - IVU. 7J7 VCJJ P.2 PLANNING ,DERgpl7id7ENT CITY OF CLEAPv,,,/ FER .Cheryl R. Cotten ?• That (I zmhyo ara) 1h5 Owner(s) and rccorcf lido holder(s) of toe following deScribod property (address or general location): 2430 Gult-To-Bay Boulevard, Clearwater. Florida I Thai this property cnn; titutns the property fur which a request for. a: {describe rebuea) --AP PA-i9JU-i-OR-.7- F-LD_ 2006--LL122___ _ a. That the u1%,10 signed (tias!havc) yppointeciand(COeado) 8ppolnt: _Alba Consulting Corp./John Atanarsio +s Itasnhe)r) ik9f,MiS) to executf. any petitions rn• OHIO( dorumarns necrwaary to afte a such petitio,i?^? M' ?). They. INS affdtrvit this rn?rn executed to induce the City of Cresrwater. F106(23 '10 cons)oerand act on the abovo descAbod.properry,- G. That :im visits to the property are necessary by City repeasenrativos in order to peocoss mis application ano tho owner pirthorizds city MPRIsentatives to visit and pholo!traph the proporty describea in th)g application: 7. That 0Ave), itte 111100 -iLinod authority, hereby cc,tily teat [he toregoing IS fNe eno correct Jupurty C+wngr - property UMTBt ---.._.... propcrry Owrcfr - _ Propony Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL AS Before me the un(joesir)ned, an of lccr duly rommiesionOd by thg laws Of the State of Florida, on this 2nd -,?-_ cry of May _ 2006 PMOnat)yappearea Cheryl R. Cotten ._ ,_.........__ . _ Who having been first rkrly Sworn Deposm ant) says that hefshO fully tlndamlands the contents O( ft epridav)t that hofshe signed. `'?rCy Noi:uy NOlgl)' Se al(Sl?mp My Comminsion Fxplra,% GEORGIA SEPT 28.2= o , S•1p.iin•u.1'i Dora'tplt?i ?npghruuon Fa rnewuvcWO?AerN m,.'ow200t1 p mLK,um;vonannva IuLn NO)w (FLO)'0o"u.doo Nt.gc 9 of 8 ® 281A s 2s1e 2s2A ? $ «? ea ( ?, r. ,? CITY OF CLEARWATER AND VICUm Y PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA $ DREW - - C.R. 328 STREET PREPARED By w : MA 66 iv:: n PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN x? 8 till _ 6e - :+ i $gA i $ ree I97 » i i ; « 'ui i ' ; + P`1 LiI $rys : 1001. M rile A- 0¢erwaler. FL 33756 ------- Ph, 7P 562-A750. Fax: (727)526-4755 30 leb ree IUS , ?J _-- - c a _ 11/01 I _ .., .:, ------ _ - 6 ?j(°-' ' httb//....clear.ale-n.com/clly_D,porlmtnl,/wart .ark,/engl 29 ,rt r ( ) f .-_-.- i ' i l -r- Rbnaake L' i I d Disclaimer: i _ 12/02 28 lot A puelk Information data Is rumHhed by me Ury of Dearwaler? Public Walks AdminisltotIw nglneNin one must be accepted/ , I 21 lee 5 i! '_____ end used by the reeiDlent ?h the undereland,,q that the data n ;: hed :: •..., i ,., _ ur?l?28 I i rttelved was cdlecled fm the purpose of deeiaplnq a graphic ' JHfiN: - r `: ' Sesr4 -? -.. S ;"- '' _-_--?_--M-__-µ __-_ i• w? , frI- Is wurerI-Iles, . As Such, the CITY of Clearraler PWA/E 6 ,te ' : :?" ! ' i .T--., l __ _ _•-1 a' makes n onlles. e,Dresstd or Implied. c ernhq the IJ> , e : 5 rig ; i i ! AtwMa •."._-".. I I acturocy. <amplela, us, rF,rth Y• or we C ity of Chit data for ; r ? ,__?.........., 2e7 i.......i any o leer po.utw,e. pnnermere. ln ay of ?oar.mer l 1 ' ...... estel cr PWA mis mlw1. of no eaenny whelsoever oaJOCtolm wmh m< use i ue.w+t ee or wch data. nt ---- 8 23 to, ' ' _ ; I :................. ... I This Alas page Is subject to perlodte change,. ro, ! '--?? For InfwmOtlOn aDOUV late!! r¢Nypns lease c 22 all PWA/E or &oRl - ..--.. W .. ,L ..._........ ST. PETERSBURG 'tn aar wee site. e, I JUNIOR COLLEGE ,rw. AN, N a j !A•eN» ami 12/ot - - l l_, , IU m !. V3 N ; ......... ........... -..... _ , S• :? ; .....tt./pg rlnt> 1 vJC. : t; SMM ?p O C Is l I ....-i •-_.. ?' ' y, _-? - 0 100 200 400 600 zC7 Li, ' l L. ! A ....'I ?. Q ........ 11/07 rttMei '•v ?. : 1 : ,--. ' 1 : .........: I :.... .; ....::.1 ..i i... ?ti Iii l SCALE' 1• 400' .-.I :'LOT 1 _.: 1 ?iittr 3 ° v as 2 r-- ------ - ----- ? r k I............................ LEGEN EASTWOOD OR I $ 17/i3 ... .... i _ 0. Ii Via eC T101 _ p 4e 17 /1Q '- ................i BLOCK NUMBER 30 - ~" R N , 0) 1 ------------------------------ •- ------° ---- --__ - N 7 1234 LOT ADDRESS lk 15 it is- '9 td 1 = a' ' tleevi 'd g 124 f7? 10 9= 8 7 8 5 4 J 2- t J L l ?• min nu,.? b C?°°eage D « » w $ Z ? i to ___ i., l ---?? CITY LIMITS LINE " « » I S 1 r: ? R I ;ren g _ w NASN STREET $ na vi i i ........ .................... 1 26 B eo I e r --j SHADED AREA PROPERTY 3 rot ro, rot « « « ? z] 2s roe 12 2 ,ee ? %a 2 toe IcS m " I J 119 ,b24 rci 1n 3 rft < A Ne 23 6 lV a % c 7« a a 5 7 ' 9 104 11 % GU TO $ Y E too 22x 21 « 20• 19 18 17 78 15 14 I l 12 ror i :..: OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ?r2J`0 A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ..-... ; l < i4/01 i....,--...-. i '°•°°°' !t I CITY OWNED PROPERTY 9 "10 ne rre $ WHITMAN .,. i ,......_.........._...-.--.-.: zroto( t 1J n, 9 5 V, to22 S STREET $ I Mo R ZONING DESICNA T 9 6 too toe' W 6 roe 20 tra nt 7l 7 toe 7 roe ne $ 8 9 61 at zu 8 ae rre 1« 4? S. g C , R , ? 4 4 t0Q I 2 • 7 8 9 10 It 22 vt 21Y 20• I9a 184 7.,- '%1 "t-1 74 13 A 12 t% :: 1 I >° ION ZONE LINE LOT 2 m Von tre '8 r+.9 $ CHAUCER STREET $ < a do, 9 nt ae al:zoroNC wo. 17 set 2 aaa .R» g; 7 R L 4 too ,4/05 i .......................... A 1030, tot '0aoo g » » »«« O 53 ft/06/02 T 44/11 z s 4 s 83 b 9 ,o n T 36 t I JOt t -_ 1 I eo¢e- S p too w tot 6 roses I117 an 3 14 13 22 2,2 zo• ,9 le? 1 ,6 ,s? a ls4 12 -•1----•--- In GREEK ' ' •...-_.,_ 2 I 12.e 8 IS ........... 316 eo W, « » « » « « eto ORTHODOX ... ... mete 13 4 5 T CHURCH 1'rytz...... _._; I eeio- g - »? 31 n 13/Ut o 13103 •70 13/04! 4$ ..t...: 4..8nT1 so 60 13/019t 13/05 1--tT/06 g ;... ci 400 „ , .,. '3/0% ..... j ! 13/10 to i ! e eega-1166 :.---°: rono m STUDEBAKER'S i..........92-99 23/0 ct 14/06 14/10 I REVISED: SR. BO 06/20102 GULF TO _ BAY BLVD _ - - $ $ so $ - - - ZONING ATLAS /01 al a2/aa»: :o oz 41/06 E `" R NE 1/4 OF SECTION 299A 7 2998 300A,418 - 29 S - 16 E 2 9 O B S • s RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PIANNM DEPARTMENT CtiY OF CLEARWATER cm C* c? CAR QUEST @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT CONSULTANTS LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES LOCATION MAP r ?r f d G,e T,,f'v .tl 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD, CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CAR QUEST ALBA CONSULTING CORP CONTACT : JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 34756 PHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727-447-2369 PREPARED BY: /WL Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. Certificate of Authorization # 00008766 Scott Lincoln, P.E. Fl Reg # 50035 1446 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: 727-446-9000 FAX: 727-446-9050 PLAN SET INDEX PROJECT SITE DATA OPGRTY LOCATION: IPARGEL BM IP/1Y/IS/WUIpIIJUIUaW) PROPERTY ONTFR; usmurtr. ?vwmn eao SrtRO z?NwcN ,?,..,./wm.v,Y«„ B.1- -A- REQUIREMENTS: MnXWBMBUI UNGBEIGIIP: MAXBr1UM FAR/ SR: PARI(ING SPACES: COVERAGE: (E%IRTfNG: ON OE\'ELOPMEN'P SIIE7? COVERAGE:(PROPOSEO:ONOEVFI.OPMETSIIE) wm: I=ZA A:1 I F11?"1.ONv O.eu?AmwnrP r/.va1n vwn mirn iw •U CAR Q-C GULF TO BAY BLVD LA CJVIL JOB N UO 3 O C Y. 2l91V#mm d0 Ad0 IN3dllWd3a SNINNVId SITE STORMWATDR I SHELLY ST 1NEAnIMT 4• ?4nnCAL SWALE w9aNC e WARNING 4 4 Gfl A53 /W STOP 1 1 Y> .?v._-i? PARALLEL WARNING wm II ? 1 U• I (NTS) SECTION A-A 900Z L z add (03 AI303d 0' 50' 100' LAM M SCALE: 1" = 50' SINGLE FAMLY RESIDENTIAL AomoRMAtE n%w uNE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY P PROPOSED (6) ONSTREET ?J PARKING SPACES SHELLY ST (60' R/W) ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER PER CITY STANDARDS TREATMENT SWALE FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4 1 q ROPOSED PEDESTRIAN RAMP & LANDING 2o' swr ..QE PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE 24 20 ° 6 N89'42'21•W 294.50' _ tune rw SITE LEGEND HANDICAP PARKING & PROPOSED DRAINAGE INLET PROPOSED CURB SITE BOUNDARY UNE •••?•••- CENTER UNE OF ROAD - RIGHT-OF-WAY - - --- EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT --- -- PROPOSED CONCRETE TYPICAL TYP HANDICAP HC # PARKING SPACES SIDEWALK S/W 5' RADIUS RS' UNEAR FEET LF SQUARE FEET SF GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE 3' UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6` VERTICAL CURBING. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPUCANT OF THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. 2. THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET NFPA 30 A REQUIREMENTS FOR REPAIR GARAGE 2000 EDITION. 4. APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERED SPRAY BOOTH SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. NO CUSTOMER ACCESSABLE PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE BUILDING. A TO Z rt I -p B A i AUTO 1.J a 94 BUILDING USE DATA CARE 1 '6 SIDE WALK 1273' '? I< a CANOPY 25 23' ' BUILDING COMPONENT AREA (SFl RETAIL / PARTS 6 000 SF < I' NG I ?? 4 n ny , J j l l GREEN WAREHOUSE / STORAGE 3.000 SF U I / ? t= ll:: ITY C'L L^• A V 24.95' TOTAL 9.000 SF . y? . . . 5' 3 PARKING DATA r CAR QUEST ONSITE: (,? ,. II { IF ' 6,000 SE 87430 1 45' ANGLED SPACES: 9 PARALLEL SPACES 4 I I I ? ?w N PARALLEL H/C SPACES: 1 S G r O ONSTREET: I w i sc 24.09 1 ENSnnc -•..--- ...--=.mn . -.. DEMI9NG WALL - - .. v,k ?,_? p ' PARALLEL SPACES: 16 m z e TOTAL SPACES: 30 oI of c STORAGE AREA 3,000 SF SIGN LEGEND I I r1 w i 100' I 1 z _ NO TEXT OR SYMBOL S17F p R1-1 STOP 30`.30` _ P R3-1 NO RIGHT TURN 24`.24` R3-7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30`.30` R5-1 DO NOT ENTER RETAIL SHOPS JI r EXiSlING rl N1 A U"N F..,. ? ? PROP 30 S R6-1 ONE WAY 36.12` R3-5R RIGHT TURN ONLY 24`.24` ( TENA SIGN WAI'L' ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. I ' Q N S STRIPING NOTES `4`' #2421, '` I o_ E TERPRI E RENT A CAR - - . ?o I ? EX 5 I r 1. TYPICAL WARRING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED NTH A4" WHITE STRIPE r 22,64 BEN ? .. ? 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. I 1 ( P OPOSED 5 LANDSCAPE ..:. v i J I N SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY NOTES BUFFER l R 1. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100 - - - - - - - 11? •••? •?••• ?aT1N?J150JJ• ••• ............ J 589'40'31 `E 294 58' TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH . -_ DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX #109, -t--- _ - {- 1371x' ^ aC 6E.12 INCLUDING THE A.D.A. (TRUNCATED DOMES PER E05 DN6 ... D.O.T. INDEX 0304.) Q) FlRE HYDRANT GULF T ISR 6 0 BAY 2.ANY NEW OR REPLACED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY .. . ... .. _-' (100' R APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE /W) RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6` THICK """' "" """ "' ""' "' ---- -- - -- -. ----- ---- FIBROUS CONCRETE, AND A MINIMUM 3000 PSI -- --- ---' WITH 6` X 6` / 10 % 10 W.W.M. [SIDEWALKS y -- -- "'" " - SHALL NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS _ - - - - ______. _. ....... .............. ......... APRON AREA(S)} REFER TO CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND .............. ............... .............. ? STANDARDS INDEX 1703. J I I 'I I EXISTING FlRE I' -HYDRANT 1MD6 / I SIDEWALK ?/"-' I I !7 ? I 1s' s' e':J - nvrv?w L ?Ri PARKING SPACES I ?t I ANOPY a All ENTRY 3? : I II . 3 I s_?': QII I ? I 1 LW, I I '? ., :NZ-1 W OC i Yn O 1 6 II. I I I ? SED Q ¢ T.I' I Lea: ,? I? I 'I II D ?s c ,, ITE :II 5' WIDE _ ONCRE CONCRE CTE SIDEWALK I1 It (5) ONSTREET PARKING SSPACES i PROPOSED,,![ PEDESTRIAN-j. RAMP EXISTING . ........ PEDESTRIAN ......... ... ....... RAMP MJ z 0 a C 6 O U O _ J y O U C9 Q m H LL. cv ? O M rc 04 H V Lu d E Q d I N Q U .......GRATE ............... H INLET -- - U W U J . __. ca. F vzi r _...-_ ... ......... SHEET No. ....._... ....... ... _ tG1YMmo d0 ALIO 1N3v4wd3a JNINNVId SITE -,EN I IPEATM SHELLY ST RE^iI a' w+nc^L swALc cuRNNC f e' z 4 PNNaNG 4 rRA55 R/W?SIItlP ? v a P.- P-- wMiFl? a" I u (NTS) SECTION A-A PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS THE PROPOSED STROMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE IS DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 INCH RUNOFF FROM THE SHADED PRKING AREA TO BE RESURFACED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT: PARKING AREA - 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME - (0.5 INCHES / 12 INCHES PER FT) • 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME - 211 CF OF STORAGE REQUIRED NO ATTENUATION VOLUME IS REWIRED SINCE THE IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDUCED BASED ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. VOLUME - 818 SF(TOP) + 0 SF (BOT) / 2 • V DEEP - 409 CF GRADING LEGEND ELEVATION TYPICAL CLEANOUT INVERT ELEVATION HANDICAP EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE INLET MITERED END SECTION PROPOSED SWALE STORMWATER FLOW EXISTING SWALE STORMWATER FLOW PROPOSED VALLEY FLOW SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW DIRECTION OF STORM WATER FLOW STORM DRAIN HELICALLY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PIPE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SIDEWALK STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER EROSION CONTROL PROPOSED HIGH POINT EL TYP CO IE HC 0 so HCAP ERCP RCP PVC FFE S/W 5-30 9002 L z adv ?A `, 0' 50' 100' M \13034 SCALE: 1" = 50' SINGLES FAIYIILY RESIDENTIAL APPROA-M-AW RTW uNE V DEEP WATER QUALITY SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 - - - -- A _ N89'42'21"W 294.50' •I I 'ATOZ AUTO ' t MORAN w^rin"sW'A0^c"Fan RF,°PO?Dlerr CARE so "I Hill ' ?YAI ? 24 o --- f CAR QUEST v 2 30 I I I jI w I m. :. i P I -...._..... --_..... _ __._. S t........... r rl<ZS ?? F'XiS I?;a RU' I ! RETAIL SHOPS ENSAL -us.>ECSS I ,!Welll AI w II i ENTERPRISE Uo t RENT A CAR I RENTAL ARK-11" LLOT LINE 44.571 LOT LINE 11 9.T I .... .... ... - - - - - - 1_ ...?...?...?... ??Nf.....?...?...y - 00' S89'40'31'E 294.58' ....-...._____________________--_____ GULF TO BAY (SR 60) (100' R/W) - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ------------------- 1? I irl /? I? _ = 3 P z o II a II I d o ' r•i 'I U ?8 ' i'. = `€ nE ?d gg I'I U e?V?? W m Lcu a G'e YII O as I ] Lu Q Q a oc m J ,. I {IJ ?LL 0 d P I I OC U. t = I _. V• ? D I N I? II II Lu 0 V ? F F ......................... te Z P . F v i H SHEET No. I t uvmaVM3 d0 ALIO 1N3MWdao %wNVId 0(1117 1. 7 11.1N GENERAL NOTES _ APPROXIMATE R/W l1NE 1 DEEP WATER QUALITY ?? UU ul q,"t m,[<"an>Iwlxrew al wnntw am..,ncemn 91e,t vcwy x,we, Pats sna9K d SHE ST NEW P TREATMENT SWALE FOR ARKING AREA ONLY. e: N Ppaaim°>>'e ??ia wr<,no-Pb" „-yht w::t,.,thnot.,t>, b<,ttmBwdm m<wM wr,.w„tr>. SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 (g0' R/yr) a: loos, P"e ea -x am..:wm u,rMa„dz•. " no,do-..•..otatre..tn [nN P.t,. A tn< dw ?ro.?a cwn,><tw P:m to rw.x:?um.m.M E A3 P e xreq ). Duals 4"n materu, labor a an " ? _ U M ._. _. '_.... ..: ._ ._ .. ...? ?. _.... ._... - ... ... .. -.-. -: ._. \ -_ ? ee b nte,pr MnwG tKy wabe,e ed Wt lnd>r wn ,P'ulvdm?tsaro w[a Utm B. No,J w:no:u dmrnNaw N"gnwtle dmnwywspraMatom w?bema•. d a ' 9? NI r< vW pemyu+rc to be P.w..aed q'tnc vdaWg w?an"r:.ier. >pc<draty>raW pMw,ew il N8942 21"W 294.50' oGudar?Nmta:W„„y", wtwx ee tmae o^ , w = •- -- _.-. _1.. ..- - I , ??.•. .. ...: .. ....? , t m m,e wwr.,ln w ti ewnadw>naa b<,c>Pwn:ae ' - 12 uP?w>r? ?cam,ma.v,<wa..?w.+or we<a,>n"tx lre;u,.sn,?maW _ - r ,,.." 71 oo A A TO Z 4# t w? "g M ?P w o- wa ro- <ao y>t o-pad a' - g I I ;I .:. V.,A 4WnaMaBro, Cmtv.tm sN trwan?aget?s?.l>Nw fa t<r:oE A9?W i 4w AUTO N :.) z I o ? w w? roa a ro b u o: w? § 'w CARE ZB u I; I IG. wq?t?r?.?B?t,ro?Prl?,>n,??twm,??4?e?rl.,,>?P< Auxtax(l2)))B)-2BI0. UN 3 45 QQ LI ' I :a 2 s ERTILIZATION - S ! ig E9 J v'1'NG p I'Oi` T,- 11 m Uo LN r1-rF MI. yvan>IW be lotted wM1'Ay-20155 pW^ tatN>x l..e d pax:y xe rTMx ra ) <:.f t::,, I (? :s I I?JJ I I s r?baam. Taal,>wetcpu<ewaw...',--,aotwlx,eep tnxeb - ? Mmaae d me root »'. Go te: :m mo G a al yam Dora aWVw cw.am<r: 21 i I w 5G S atan fnxa.w? z y B CAR QUEST . I WIW: We+ elec, in . 1 31abN, Pw caa l?W:pcrdtrvnt c2c 3--! ? , 1 I' pU rouMcover Mea I - 0' I. II JP 1 N n r<roe leumm w m rhea q?vau to Ylnmr et ,e lcrt:lw prx mansanur<f, 2 I n Z J T ucm mwuv,.w' ?. I ux.xm W I N' II W 1 i n Z ... _.... .__. !j 1?21 F? J_i. pC . ti J :- ?? T - NG AU EX O t r :,,. ..; N-A. ., .: ? i I: I I I it a E1 TREE PLANTING OETNL ?1 iREE PROTECTION DETAIL _ LL - - ._ . _. _ - 5 RETAIL $HOPS i 1',le I I I a \ rc I..I:.vim ., =..... U STRIP ( aQ i ENTERPRISE DA I _ V = co) °a as ? U U " A`2 2 u o RENT A CAR I D I I I SHRUB PUNTING DETAI ( , ? V I ? - T JL ?- I ?\ L 1 Plant Materials Schedule a v • I Quantity Code Botanical Name Common Name Spu;frcat:on Spaong N E :-i G\ I .I I I 46 MIB Nrblscus spp. ttiblscus 3 qal., 24' x 24' 39.- ' ' ' V Q A d I.: PI !+'?T(-:?, LOT LINE 44.57'1 LOT LINE 100' LOT LINTr L 1 4 . : I i' 7 ICB Ilex cornuta burlord:i Burford Holly 3 gal., 24 x 24 30 o.c. 200 TAM VNtN spp. Ycllow Lantana 1 gal., 12 ht. x 2' spr. 14' o.c. 3 L l lagers roem°' 'o Crap,yrt io htx 5'sp, 25• ca. xar nd A 45 LMM 4r:o etM t G 1 l 12'h 12• IB' c J Q - - ...... ?... ?...?... ?. . ... ?... ?... ? ! 1 S89'40'31"E 294 58' . p U z ec rass ga ., - spr. o.c. Lrape M"sor Gant b-',, 1 a1 12-ht xlz'spr 18'oc 0 . 3 12 JP Jun pervs parson r Parson's Jun per 3 gal . 2' ht x I B" spr 3a o c - - - - - - - - - - - '! + - - . 50 POM Podor?rpus Podorarpus 3 9.1, 24- ht. x 24• spr 39 o c C A 39 M Raph okp s ndrea Ind an Hawtlgm 3 gal B' M1t. x 18' spr 3a o.c . D 100 TJV TracM1elospermum yam no dies Var Confederate Jasmine 3gal 18'M1t.x I5'spr 30'-. GULF TO BAY (SR 60) 20 TJN Trachelospermum -t- Dwarf Confederate Jasmine I gal., 0 ht. x 12',p,. 18'-. 7 UA Ulmu>a b Elm 2'ht. x 4'spr. 2.5' al a $ CAP LAN IJD D A P 8 ZPU Z- NH.- Cardboard P- 7 gal., 3a x 30' 3G... c. S ARCHITECTS (100' R/W) ran w,ry or;.? o zs' sa loa "" c IoB No. uon 5cale- 111 = 50'-0" SHEE L-I W EEKDAY WEEKEND TYPE OF USE MIN PARKING SQUARE MINIMUM w FTG REQ'D Night ;Night Night Night Night I Day Day Day Day Day I Evening Evening Evening' Evening Evening; Day Day Day Day Day Evening Evening Evening Evening3 Evening ? READ Midnight Midnight, Midnight , Midnight Midnight' 9 a.- 6 a.m. 6 a.m. 6 a .m. 6 a.m.' 6 a.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 6 p.m. - 6 p.m. -. 6 p.m. - 6 p.m. - 6 p.m. - midnight midnight midnight midnight midnight 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 9 a.m. - 6 p.m- ;!6 p.m. - 6 p.m. - 6 p.m. - 6 p.m, - 4 p.m. midnightmidnight midnight midnightmidnight 10Q°% o 5% 5°l0 10% 10a°% o 700 10l)% 40% 100% 100% 4 96% 90°1a 100°% o 100°l0 100% 100°/a 10% 80% 100% ' 100°l0 70% i 5% o i 100% 104% ti Vehicle Service 1.5 3600 5.4 5 4D ? _ 5.40 -5 40 - 5.40 5.40 R t il S l 5 12719 63 595 r' 318 e a a es . , j. 1 44.52 5L24 63.60 :E4152 J _ .1 Office 4 1176 4.704 ?R 0 24 ? 4.70 0;47 I 0.47 _ . [ 0.24 -?( -? Adult Use 5 2352 11.76 1 18 ? - 4.70 I 11,76 9.41 pw Vehicle Sales/Rental 2.5 2000 5 5.00- 1 5.00 t i 5.00 5 00 ?t 5 00 L ls 21847 90 ?t _75 1 64 80 (' 84 _ _ . ? _. ,. 67' CAR QUEST @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS i ( LOCA T ION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION THEEASTERN 150FEETPEO, TAINING41,99, SF NSOL)O nuTPROPERTYDESCRIB- FOLLOWSPEROA-3LPG.- FROM THE SW CORN'EROF THE NE III OF SECTION I., TOWNSHIP29SOUTN, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN S89-5-ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION IA 52451 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE FOR KIl MR AVETHEN'CENI"0118' E. ALONGTHECEYTERLL'EOF INMER AVENUE 11003FEETTOTIESOUTHLMEOFGUUMN YALRESFMTADDMONAS REEORDED INTHE PLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 55 OF THE PUB)ICRECORDSOFPMEIUS CWNTy, FLORSDA, THENCE N 9941'19' W. ALONG THE SONH LINE OF SAID GULF TO BAY ACRES FlBST ADDM N,32450FETTniE CESI'O2'13-W,550.2FEET'R7HHMO OF BEGBNNLD LESSTTff SOUTH 50.W FEET AND THE EAST 1RW FEET FOR THE ROAD RIGHT-OF- Wramin St m „ GFBLeel 61 Sl1911ny St ? - P m , . t nY 4 GuNTi SayBlvd 916 SI ?85? a SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 16 E PROJECT CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERSIPLANNERS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LA CIVIL COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES 1376 COURT STREET 1666 LANEY DRIVE CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33756 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 PHONE 7274769000 PHONE: 7277873840 SURVEYORS: ARCHITECTS: CORNERSTONE ENG.& SURVEYING, INC. (FOBEDETERMMED) 2433 GULF TO BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34625 PHONE (727) 799A 763 FAX: (727) 799-1764 LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES POWER: PROGRESS ENERGY 2166 PALMETTO STREET, BLDG F CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33765 CONTACT: CRAIG KOPKAU PHONE: (1'2'0562.5660 TELEPHONE VERIZON 1280 EAST CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 CONTACT: DAN FARMER PHONE:,(727) 562.1165 CONTACT: 808 CARN PHONE:(727) 5621126 SEWER: CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 SOUTH MYTRLE AVE CLFARWATER,FL PHONE: 727-562-0600 GAS: CLEARWATER GAS SYSTEMS 400 MYRTLE AVEN CLEARWATER, FL 34615 CONTACT: TOM ROBERTSON WATER: CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 SOUTH MYTREE AVE CLEARWATER, FL PHONE: 727-5624600 CABLE: BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS, LLC 2530 DREW ST CLEARWATER, FL 33515 CONTACT: CHRIS NIGHTENGALE 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD , CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COt7NTY, FLORIDA CAR ('QUEST ALBA CONSULTING CORP CONTACT : JO:H1V ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWAT!AR, FL 34756 PHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727.447-2369 PREPARED BY: VIL Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. Certificate of Authorization # 00008766 Scott Lincoln, P.E. Fl Reg # 50035 1446 Corm. Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: 727-446-9000 FAX: 727-4,16-9050 ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PLAN SET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. BOUNDARY SURVEY 3. SITE PLAN 4. PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 5. EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION VIEWS Ll. LANDSCAPE PLAN ?? 94? .IpM,'F1?? ??(?'4.4F4RHR?R4 PROJECT SITE DATA PROPERTY LOCATION: (PARCEL ID# 1829116/000001130/0400) 243000IFTOBAY (NWCOILNEROFGULFTOBAYAKMIe'AVE) CLEARWATER. FINE SCO PROPERTY OWNER: ALANROPHIE;RALPHROPXIF;CECELLABETECH CHERYLIDHENGO AIR. CONSULTING CORP.(IOHNATANASIU,PREEMM 1420 COURT STREET. CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33%566147 PROPERTY ZONING: SITE LCPPESLYILY"NED:C(LOR4.6RLLLL) BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: STANDARD AEOVTRED PROVIDED AS COMPREUT SFVE INTILL FRONT(KMIERk 25'roBIDGA3PTTR 25.V TO BLOG(EXISTMG) R IP TO PAVEA6NT FRONT(SHELES'1: ES' TO BIDGffiISPVMT 62.49 TO BLDG (EXISTING) 49.9P TOGi1RRPAVFTSEYT SIDE(WFST-COMMERCIAL) Itl TDBUIDD. 21.9' TO B13N;(Eas-) SDE(SOUTR{OMkR[U1) 2'. TO BUILDING 121UNro DLOG(FXDTNC) MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: ALLOWED: 21 PROPOSED: 2' MAXIMUM PAR I ISR: COMMERCIALFAR: ALLOWED. us PROPOSED: RSM2 COMMERCIALISR: ALLOWED.- PROPOSED:0.9W5 PARKING SPACES: REQUIRED: 1.5 SPACER PER I,WO SF(REFERENCINGVFHIGESFRVREUSE MIXT7DMNG) REQUIRED: LS '9.W0 SF BLDG I I.BW SF - 14 SPACES PROVIDED: (U HG .(ID E%IERIOR. Ho INTERIOR GARAGE • 245PAEE3 COVERAGE: (EXISTING: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) BUNTING AREA (CAR QUEST) 9AW SF 21.43% BUILDING AREA(EGFAPRLSE) )115 SF 7.99% VMBCHLSRUSB ARFA(VUArARQ116'D 13, 1SF 12,91 VEHICUAR USE AREA (ENTERPRISE) 15,6615E -EWALR QSi 37.H% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 41.MOSF O% 99.15% DRYREIEHHONFmD II 'f o% PERIMETER GREEN 557 SE G INFERIORGREENSPACE OSF 0% TOTAL PERVIOUS O5F 0..P5% TOTALSITEARFA 41,997ST IW.W% COVERAGE: (PROPOSED: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) 8 IIDINGAREA(CAR QUEST) 9,OW SF 21,43% BUHDING AREA(ENTFRPPRISE) 3J55 SF 7.99% VEHICULAR USE AREA (VUACARQITEt7) 9,061 SF 11.59% VEHICULAR USE AREA(ENTERPRINE) Ui.-SF 39U0% SINEWALK. -F O% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 37,S19Y 905% DRY RETENTION POND 1,0 W SF 2.59% PERLMETERGREDp 2.14. SF 5.12% 1 RIORGREP.YSPACE(IUAWAREOD) 940 SF 1907 SF READ 214%(10.57%OFWA)fC.Q.) TOTALPERVIOUS 4,178 SF 9.95% TOTAL SITEAREA 41,991SF IW.% NOTE: TOTALSH1AREAFORCARQUE5TIS2L958SF FLOOD ZONE DATA: N FE.M.A. ZONE ' X' , PER FRTM NAP PANEL N0. US-17D (-90 CAR QUEST Q GULF TO BAY BLVD. LA CIVIL JOB 9043-003 a lei U 0 SITE 6" VERTICAL CURBING PARKING WHEEL STOP- STOP t, STORMWATER TREATMENT SWALE 4' 4' 3' 4 4 SHELLY ST q B' 2' GRASS R/W STRIP PARALLEL PARKING (N TS) SECTION A-A PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE SITE LEGEND HANDICAP PARKING (l PROPOSED DRAINAGE INLET PROPOSED CURB SITE BOUNDARY LINE - - CENTER LINE OF ROAD - RIGHT-OF-WAY .. ................ EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE O TYPICAL TYP HANDICAP HC # PARKING SPACES SIDEWALK S/W 5' RADIUS R5' LINEAR FEET LF SQUARE FEET SF GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6" VERTICAL CURBING. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. 2. THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET NFPA 30 A REQUIREMENTS FOR REPAIR GARAGE 2000 EDITION. 4. APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERED SPRAY BOOTH SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. NO CUSTOMER ACCESSABLE PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE BUILDING. BUILDING USE DATA BUILDING COMPONENT AREA SF RETAIL / PARTS 6,000 SF WAREHOUSE / STORAGE 3 000 SF 0' 50' 100' LA ?_EL_ SCALE: 1" = 50' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APPROXIMATE R/W INE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY PROPOSED (6) ONSTREET PARKING SPACES SHELLY ST TREATMENT 3"111-1 FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER A (PER CITY STANDARDS) 6 TALL FENCE 20' SIGHT TRIANGLE 24' - _:::? [ __ ..-- _- --. - . . -.- ----- ° --- ..... ...... N89'42'21 "W 294.50 n 6 VERTICAL CURB IT:P) 0' 1¦ m7 LAND BU n \a'„ ATO Z ?11t A? ® I ( ~ 9 AUTO ? uj 9 CARE 1 ° U _j I t-- SIDEWALK 12.73' ' " l Y a aQ CANOPY 23 23 f • J / 4 (EXISTING pj N m 4 N? 1 O 4.94' Q \? AUTO m Of Of m GREEN `m ¦ 24 96' R ( Ai% 2495' . PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN RAMP & LANDING 1 1-...... EXISTING FIRE II III YDRANT 5' Iw CONCRETE; SIDEWAIdf'', - ' II ?? I l U Z' Fa _IT PROPOISED (3) ONSTRE TOTAL = 9,000 SF W PARKING SPACES m ~ 5' 5' j PARKING DATA Ij CANYP uLL ° o ' / - 1 1 CAR QUEST p24.10 I'm . I MAIN NTRY .I orJSIrE: 6,000 SF I 45' ANGLED SPACES: 9 ?- ?24,NC 3 I PARALLEL SPACES: 4 PARALLEL H/C SPACES: 1 ?•DRIVE 1 ?I EXISTING `W ONSTREET: ^ 6., AI524.89 f DEMISING WAIL 1 / PARALLEL SPACES: 16 zl td Q ° J STORAGE AREA r D . TOTAL SPACES: 30 cnv I aj oI 3,000 SF 3 °' ? ? W p 100' SIGN LEGEND W _ cli NO TEXT OR SYMBOL SIZE o j C., 1 I YI 30.2' ¦ a Y R1-1 STOP 30"x30" a3 TU IL° nI _j, F S'J NL PROPOS R3-1 NO RIGHT TURN 24"z24" D 11 Q Z RN R3 J`Ii dESs -7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30"x30" T c RED All SHOPS - 30 SF I g R5-1 DO NOT ENTER 30"00" TENANT IL ca ` R6-1 ONE WAY 36"x12" SIGN ON i I Z (q a R3-5R RIGHT TURN ONLY 24"x24" S i1N r I ST RIP N N - WALL I N Q m ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON ) 1 U w ?? ; o UNIFORM TRAFFIC U -a s C CONTROL DEVICES. a Q m Z ENTERPRISE I z °a a N STRIPING NOTES I #2416 u 0 #2 ?4^4 , ,? 2 -6 0? 5 - f RENT-A-CAR ( I ' v I U° + qo AUTO N I PROP086 5' WIDE 1. TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED 2064 .' N" m X CONCRET SIDEWALK WITH A 4° WHITE STRIPE. I - -^_ -- -o R>Ni.v_ 4.A.',hiNG ' s'j II a 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. a PROPOSED 5 III N I LANDSCAPE PRgP05Pb (5) ONSTREET ...... ........ 11 c? SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY NOTES II _ N IN BUFFER PARKING SPACES 1-, PAN-ER LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100' ?. 16OT LM 15d'Z n r; _ _1 __ __ tip,,;. _e• 7.,..._ i 1. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT 589'40'31"E 294.58' r '' PROPOSED TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE - DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH DRIVEWAY ¦=? I1 DRIVEWAY :--? DRIVEWAY PEDESTRIA?\,'\i CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT - RAMP SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX #109, I- 137.84 68.12' INCLUDING THE A.D.A. (TRUNCATED DOMES PER ......... EXISTING - EXISTING D.O.T. INDEX #304.) FIRE HYDRANT PEDESRT GULF0 SAY _(SR 601 RAMP 2.ANY NEW OR REPLACED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY -ORIGINAL APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE (100' R W EXISTING _ /) _ mED GRATE-- RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" THICK " ^ - - ` INLET FIBROUS CONCRETE, AND A MINIMUM 3000 PSI WITH 6" X 6" / 10 X 10 W.W.M. [SIDEWALKS - J, 1 qry SHALL NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS - - - - . . --.. App[? { '+'-a! f 2W_ - APRON AREA(S)]. REFER TO CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND ..... _.__._... __ ........ ...... .., _....... ..__............ ..... .... ......... .... _.._ _ STANDARDS INDEX #103. PLANNING DEPARTMENT - - ----CITY Of CtEARVJ c c 0 o n S o z a` ? 0 3 a a U y v¢ SuoISIAaa U. 0•,w $it a, c o .o " Z ;oA ?W < ?F Z ?b'o a? U w U 0 a Can 00 0 J c (7 0 O U. a qe W a (V W H ca W d Q U F nk^ {jw 0 w? aF ai[~ SHEET No. 3 { SITE STORMWATER TREATMENT , 6° VERTICAL SWALE . 4' 4' 3 PARKING 4 4 WNEEL i, 1 I ? /l?? . STOP LJ?/?I SHELLY ST 0' 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APPROXIMATE R%W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR NEW PARKING G AREA ONLY. (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 A 7' 8' 2' 13' GRASS R/W STRIP PARALLEL PARKING -'---- ,-.::171• lTjl T%'-7171_llL<?T? (NTS) SECTION A-A PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS THE PROPOSED STROMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE IS DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 INCH RUNOFF FROM THE SHADED PRKING AREA TO BE RESURFACED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT: PARKING AREA = 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME = (0.5 INCHES / 12 INCHES PER FT) * 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME = 211 CF OF STORAGE REQUIRED NO ATTENUATION VOLUME IS REQUIRED SINCE THE IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDUCED BASED ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED SWALE CAPACITY: VOLUME = ( 818 SF(TOP) + 0 SF (BOT) I / 2 * 1' DEEP = 409 CF GRADING LEGEND ELEVATION EL TYPICAL TYP CLEANOUT CO INVERT ELEVATION IE HANDICAP HC EXISTING ELEVATION a PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION -? DRAINAGE INLET MITERED END SECTION D PROPOSED SWALE STORMWATER FLOW EXISTING SWALE STORMWATER FLOW PROPOSED VALLEY FLOW SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW - DIRECTION OF STORM WATER FLOW STORM DRAIN SO HELICALLY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE HCAP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ERCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFE SIDEWALK S/W STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 5-50 EROSION CONTROL - - - PROPOSED HIGH POINT ---- N89'42'21 "W 294.50' ; . ATO Z AUTO THE 5,060 SF AREA SHADED HEREON YALL DE RESURFACED AND GRADED `y CARE w Lu l , TO DRAIN TOWARD THE PROPOSED 4 1 2 U J STORMWATER SWALE FOR TREATMENT a Ul j FXI,TI" 4n l J ?? a 0 a I AUTO m vp rp'-p1' II V Ph:- s I R. l FA''LIT p ' ?O II CAR GUEST I II I #2 A 'I nl I I? I GI Q _I I :3 04 o• 00: IJJI WI N M- O ° i _ ...... ?? _ I NCI I I = ° 0 W p P In Y I J, EXISTI.t 1, I di a ?? i RETAIL SHOPS fi R N'h ==' I i Lu °?} I I I I x __ ? I I 1 Z (n a ('?riIS"NG LI ,Il.' ST?I° ?:.^ ER)V) "- -?---- I ry ? rn a H m ENTERPRISE ?z Q a I X2416 r_401 #2 2 4:'.424 #2,26 In I' I uj U' 0- RENT-A-CAR I I! I ..-- - ..... ... J -....J--.....:.---- -- UO I > SIiN r f0 .. _._ - ? I I? I I I I I ?I I IT I. \ `` SIN IN I I P•..A.i:FR LOT LINE 44_57 LOT LINE 100'I _ LOT LINE 150' - - - - - I -..._.,,_,.._,..-.,._..._. 589'40'31"E -294.58' r GULF TO BAY (SR 60) RECEVEI NAL (100' R/W) -- --- ------- - , H 2 2006 rt .C PLANNING DEPARTMENT La CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 b q M II N ° - o z ? -2 a m 0 3 .4 a U H m r A-P S ? I9 Z i O V ?q j4 t r q 3 Z ?E J >5-c°o cn o? ? Z QA?s ? U o au?ua a a C.'1 ? Z a m J CL O H W C7 a J a Z => p G J LL In co Cie 2E wt W a I- N a @D c z J a co oe W V Z a a U a F rjj at~ rnF SHEET No. 4 1] APPROXIMATE R/W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 IA IT T 1 11 N89'42'21 "W 294.50' 1 r T11 j - - C_-- _ _- _ -' - T -. _ " _ II ATO Z p ? o ® A?. ® AUTO w ) J Go 2 i/ CARE ? L'i JA , Ga 14 G Z Q n 45 Q LI 4 Q L M 40 J Q 4 .w J DEPAR m w ? W p> 100 01 of LMG TJN alb 0,' J I> I Lu 32 H1B 1? ` i CAR QUEST 30 LMG d 37 2 01 0) _ _j I4 LMG I >- N I O a 20 ' W J co: ? N . X- a ux ,.xmuxm Root "iIX ui I J V) 0 _j 4.2 1 I JI Y N S T RE AIL SHOPS R* 'A '' - s I f • 75 FIIB W .: _ _ WW 3 Q a A ENTERPRISE Z u24 6 #24201 #2 422; il-.. F G .2C 0 W > RENT -A-CAR 3 0 _ of U? 1 . y: - `:'N I i d P IN I J LOT LINE 44.57 LO - - T LINE 100' - - i ? ..,_..._ ` I. ; 4 _ LINE 150, ..._... LOT ,.._..._ .,. ' - _ 58940-31"E 29458 ? r ? . - -- ._!..: ?._._ ...... -- ____ GULF TO BAY (SR 60) (100' R/W) ....................... ...... ..... ...... __...... ...... ..___--__.._.-? i _ - •GENERALLAND5CAPE NOTE5 I c,' all II I ? OQ I W 'loot U ca 2C U) ail II-- l ` / I.Y oQ i i I; II I liQa I II I lit I • • I. All plant matenils shall be Flonda A l a better and msblLel to Highest omxry 5undards. Plants shall be healthy, free of pest and ch-,e. 2. M plants 51a11 be container grown erupt as noted m plan. 3. Al palms and tress shall have &aght tomb reth no twsts. Vnottmg a other delectrve characteristics. 4. Wen shall be 100%P:ne Bah, inshlled to a Oil— th,clpess of 2*. 5. Sod shall be 95% weed free 5t. Awgosbne'Flmmm', i,stated with tight Joints. G. Al dinensicns shall be held ch-W by the landscape Corbacta pro, to conet-t- .0 any d5crepanoss reported to the landscape Architect. 7. Ad-Wab gull be as speched on the plan. If matenals, Iabcr or instatai tschmquss do not adnae to the 9pecdcabony they ml be rejected by the landscape Architect w,th specified matmals and meUlbbon amed cut by the Lardsape Centraeta at ro additnnal cost. 8. No subsbt,tans Of matenals or changes W the drewngs or 5peofirab- shall be made. 9. Al rcV ed pe,ni are to he proded by the nsbOmg contractor unless specifically stated oths-le rn the specifications 10. Codracta:dentfiotmn signs shall not be flowed on the project. I. Contractor shall be responsible For all items as Shown or described m: the plan and Weafiabae. 12. M proposed landscape and Sod areas wdan ng bed Or weeds shall be treated mth'Rotindup' per ina acturces s'F-f-twns 13. Undsape Contracts shall pro46e all necessary site prepratan required W ready the site for plantmg as speohed, 14 The landscape Contractor shall waranty and guarantee all matera15 and labor for a penod of 90 days for shrubs and gmurJCwa rams and tress Warranty and grantee penod shall beg,, upon date of corglebm. 15. At repa rs auyJor reria-ert, shall be made by the Ia,dsape Contractor wth n 10 won q days upon cobfiabon of any dehoenoes by the over a their reprexnbtrve. IG. At 1-t-regardvq the L-4S pe plans I'd5peahat- shall be deeded to the Undsape A0,tsct It (727) 7872840, FERTILIZATION 5hmb5 and Trees All trees and shrubs shad be ferbhed wth'lgrdorm' 20-15-5 plant rig tablets at t me of pbntng and pro, to retallabOn of plant p4 baclho Tablets shall be placed-f-lly nand the root banatadepth t8atsbetwxn the "dole and botton of the root ball. Application Rate: tablet I Gal-Carla I 21 'Z 3 Gallon (polo 2 21 g m tablets 5 Galon Carla 3 2I grain tablets 7 Gallon Costa4 21 grain tablets Trees: 3 tablets per each Ill' calper of Wnk Groundcover Areas Al q-,JccAsr arts, shit remove fe tAvaon ih rozr d? brae release fetlaer pa nanubaaers spl.fi.cons. sin n_: vw:e. Ply, 9 ? Iasi -oX V+'r? ti9 lances TREE PLANTING DETAIL ?T-o- [? gtme r" xe'HagM L<pt pwl 2,•nemn a" TREE PROTECTION DETAIL S t>rsub rrA,w a1 1 rw lax eel ?nang utm btlM11? 511RU13 PLANTING DETAIL Plant Materlal5 Schedule Quantity Code Botanical Name Common Name 5recfwtlon 5pacmg 4G HIB Hibiscus spp. Hibiscus 3 jai., 24' x 24' 30" o.c. 7 IC13 Ilex comuta burfordu Burford Holly 3 gal., 24' x 24' 30' o.c. 200 LAM Lanatna spp. Yellow Lantana I gal. 12' ht. x 12'5pr. 18' o.c. 9 L I Lager5troemla ne ices Gape Myrtle 10' ht. x 5'spr, 2.5' cal. 45 LMM Drop, Mu-an Aztec Grass 1 gal, 12' ht. x 12'spr, 18' o .c. 130 LMG L yore Musean Gant Dnope I gal 12' ht. x 12' 5pr. 18' o .c. 125 JP Jun pcros parsons Parsons Jun per 3 gal., 12' ht x 18" 5pr 30" ox. 50 POM Podocarpus spp. Podocarpus 3 gal„ 24" ht. x 24" 5pr. 30' o.c. 39 R3 Raphwlepls radio Indian Hawthom 3 gal., 18' ht. x 18' 5pr. 30' o.c. 100 TJV Trachelo5permum ja5mmoldle5 Var. Confederate Jasmine 3 gal, 18' ht. x 15" spr. 30' o.c. 20 TJN Trachelosperm ran a5lat-im Dwarf Confederate Jasmine I gal., G' ht. x 12' 5pr. 18' o.c. 7 UA Ulmus alata Elm 12' ht. x 4' 5pr, 2.5' cal. 8 ZFU 2amia furfuracea Cardboard Palm 7 gal., 30' x 30' 30 o.c. I-. - - 0 25' 50' 100 Scale 1 50'-0" a ntuu,al, oSV? ? ?? ?? ea 1 ? .. a + ? ? L 8 , ? ` lt. ki r ib 1 ZZ '• fr - ' T.41. Or ; 4 ^o - ? ? ? r l to ., f11t111t"b s I ? ` CL_ 1 W cis ? L m L. ILL. o 0 i w CIS 7 0 Q M v UNU ?a ? C av E 0 4. J 0 0 CDA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1666 Laney Dme Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727 787-2840 pit 727 7854017 Landac," A,chitxmre Sit, Planning Con-I Admirdaoatun I LOB NO. 25077 L - I ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 7 2006 DEPARTMENT CLEA`,RWATER ac, - ~ ~c d10 I 3 ~ ~i SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES ~ I PP FIRST ADDITION PLAT B00 52, PAGE 55 60 RIGHT-OF-WAY , SHEL_LEYS_TRE ';t - - - - - - - - - - 27.S ASPHALTPAVE67ENf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I- - - - - - ' o N 89°41'1 " ~ ONC. CATCH BASA1 3 O O 3 0 30 60 c 8 W 324,50 ~ i , OP SIGN M L2'VALLEYCURB ~ I MULCH C C. /ASPHALT i 30 R M O = ~ ~ ~ ti~ o t n , i c.POSr SCale~ 1" 30' 1" = 30' FD.In"C.LRk3749' N8 411$ W 294.50 ~ 'PP 13 FD.4"R4" C.dL NO# ' ~ - - a:oa-- ~ 49.0 ~ - BACRFLOW DEVICE 4' HIGH CONC. WALL 4~ 1494' 6'CHAINLINKFIN i I i TRASH AREA ON CONC. `p~' DO G Q`P oMV ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ti 0 ~ ~ ONE ~~4'~`~ ~ ~ o' 0 o STORY x o oMV , I ~J °i MASONRY qq oM`J ~ ~ ~ 6' CHAIN LA'K FENCE U 0~ ~ ~ CBS ~4 4~ ~'j brv 0 1~ h oMV ~ oMV oMV oMV ~ I laooo' 29~ ~ I I r p p~r I 'y w ~ ~ 4 ARKIN SPACB ' 4~2 d0.00' x ' I DBtT CONC. ~ c & ONE 8 °a 6 P G S ACES STORY , I ' PP I MASONRY r~r O m oMV o ~ cBS ~ ~ N ~ a ' ~ I 0 i <y 0~ F ' ~4`~~ 'I Y' W M ~ ~ ~ U I ~ ~ -I O O ~ 0 Ll ` I b I M O ~ ~ z M pp~~~~v - _ V i AClC9 SP ~ ACPS 6'WOODFENCE .3 9,3Ta ~ \ ~ O,S ~ ~ - _ CONC. ~ ~ 19.93' $ ~ h JS. ~ ! 45.50' 24.8' 15,y2~ v 7T ~I,19'. A f£, ir1 ~ ~ a ~ swoooF7<xcH rl ~ I g b ~ ~ P N 20.00' ~ 1.68' ONE 600' O ' 0 19.35 STORY R I23£ r-I COV.CONC.RAMP h i _ MASONRY O I ACEFLOW DEVICE i ~ ~ a 7.75' COV. N ~ CONC. i n O~+ L[GHTPOLH , _ i 9.15 , STORY f 19.93' a 0 y°•, 19.63' ?6.10' I MASONRY c~oz~C. ~ b CBS ~4'CHAINLINKPENCB CONC.S / ~ I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I MErALPOSTS ~ LESS THE EAST 30' FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE NE ll4 OF SECTION IS,TOWNSHIP ' 29 SO o ~ n 912: - UTH, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN 589 40 55 EAST, ALONG THE o.3s EAST- ST CE R L F AID E PP I° I M WE NTE IlVE 0 S S CTION 18, 200.0 Ff. FOR I p o ' 20.SS 20.SS 18.50' 18.48' 18,4T 16.50' 1 P.O.B.; THENCE CONTINUES 89 40 55 EAST, ALONG THE EAST- o g I M WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 324.57 FT. TO THE DOWNGUY 1`~6' ],36' 2.OT COV. CONC,136' 13T ~ 13S l.3 ~ M CENTER LINE OF KII,MER AVE.; THENCE N.1° 01' 28" EAST, ~ o 0 o a o q Ci I o d o o I C ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF KII,MER AVE., 330.03 FT. TO THE ° a ( , ~ I SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDTTION AS RECORDED I ~ 4p II 13,3' W IN PLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 55, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF 1 P G sPA ~ I 00 PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N. 89° 41' 1S" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH ~ j ( P ,I N LIIVE OF SAID GULF TO BAY ACRE5 FIRST ADDITION, 324.50 FT.; ~ e4 t E ~ I p THENCE S.1° 02' 13" WEST 330.02 FT. TO I - I ° THE PA.B. ,y LESS THE SOi1TH 50.0 FT. AND THE EAST 30.0 FT. FOR ROAD RIGHT AF-WAY. occuPATIONAL slcN INP ~ PLA wioccTmATioN T' o nL sIGN i ~ z DCVA--0 ar VAI,~ Q,BC.BOA SAN[TARYMANHOLB TOPS[GN I WATER VAL LIGHT POLB~ ELEC. BOX DOWN GUY I, i'CONC.SB)EWALK' FD.ffi"C.LR.#3033 pLp 0 t D t N CONC. ------~--3O.~IIt_ ~ 5 89 40 55 E 294.57 wATBRVAL P '(B oo .5"Ri" C.M. L I C~ i~i0k I WATER MBTERS i ' SANITARYMANHOLE ~ ATIItVN.VE ~ WA TERS ORATEINLBT ~ i i O HYDIIANT o k 0 I o ORI IP G ORIGINAL ~ I RECEII i RECEIVED S. 89° 40' S5" E, 200.00' o t n r ~ ® ~ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ EAST-WEST CENTER LINE OF ` _ S. 89 40 55 E. 324,57 QP~ ~ } APP 2 7 2006 - - - - _ _ _ _ ASPHALT PAVEMENT SW CORNER OF THE SEC.18, TWP. 29 S., RGE.16 E. p,O.B. - ~ - - - - - - F GUL TO BAY BOULEVARD i NE 114 OF SEC. 18, TWP. 29 S., RGE.16 E, ; pIANNING D~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT c 100 RIGHT-OF-WAY LE rn CIiY OF C CITY OF CLEARWATER H Wp a~ FLOOD ZONE: "X" , ACCORDING TO F.LRM. ;k125096-0128•G ABBREVIATIONS DATED:9-3-03 TYPE OF SURVEY: LANDORBOUNDARY USE: DESIGN FD.PS N. -FOUND PKNAII, • • r.., L.R PE NNY! L.R. PENNY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. S.N&D =SETNAH.ANDDLSCd5539 F.C,M. -FOUND CONC. MON. - PLAT SIGNATURE.' _ ~ - PAN.&D, 3.I.R. SET IItO D °FOUND NAi1,AND DISC. NRO N5539 - B ERR ASIS OF FIELD B NO UND G OUND INSTALLATI R EARINGS: ONS 0 IMPRO ME 10730- FIEI.D VE NTS HAVE BEEN LO ATED E% 1OZND , C CEPTASNOTED n'1 ADDRESS & -SET CO 7EM B,M1L -BENCHMARK ~ ,2. C,M. NCRE ONUAIENT 10730-102ND AVENUE NORTH =MEASURED (Ml NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLE EAST R[GHT OF WAY LIlVE CTING EASEMENTS RIGHT OF WAY R APiDlO OWNERSHIP ~~i F.OJ?. - OU~NDOPOENNP~E cARFL.EL. =GARAGe ~aELEV. 6C) °cnLCULATED ~~'FURNISHEDTOTHISSURVEYOREXCEPTASNOTEDAND/OR SHOWN. HILMERAVENUE ~30GULFTOBAYBOULEVARD JOB N0.06-0447 DATE. 4 ° ~ SEMBVOLE,1 SEAMOLE, FLORIDA 33778 F1'1'. -FOUNDPINCHPIPE C.4F. =CHAINLHVKFENCE N) =DEEDED ~ BEING: N.OI° 00'24" E, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA /19! 006 . ~ . ~ o PHONE: (727) FH =FIRE HYDRANT 'roe -TOroFeAmc ~ ~ ayx" ~ sa ` FAX: (727) PHONE: (727) 398-4360 FAX: (727) 319-6051 gP07~VALiD UNLESS LP -L[GHTPOLE PP -POwERPOLE ~ •s LICENSED BI R DRAWN BY: LP L IG SEALED My CE TIFY T • R P -MONPPORHYGVALVE PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE COMNIITMENT POLICY o. 0 HIE FAMII.Y PARTNERSHIP ! ALBA CONSULTING CORPORATION ~ ' ~ ~ LICENSED BUSINESS # 6539 ti - 0 .-,r ,'tlh,', ~ r__ . i i 'I i I I ~ A ' / it SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES i I ~ FIltST ADDITION I 'I, PLAT B00 52, PAGE 55 , ~ _ _ 60 RIGHT OF WAY , SHELLEYSTRE , ~ nsABPRALTPAV1u~ff1Vr --------~I------ ' ONC. CATCH BASIN 3 ~ ~ 3 ' I o N 89°41'18" W 324.56' 30 60 0 ~ P SIGN C txvALLEYCD66 ~ t*! I MII[.CH C. AgppAI,T ~ ~ ~ M o , „ , Scale 1 30 V = 30' FD.In"GLRY3749 N8 4118 W 294.50 ~ ~ FD.4"X4"CIVLNOd ~ 13 _ - - - - o-08--- / 40.OU , BACIDrLOW DEVICB 4' H[GH CONC. WALL 9S.~T 6' CI3AIN I.A]X t'IN ~ 14 I I TRASxARBAOxcDxa ~ ~ ~Y Do c lti I oMV ~ ~ I I , o ONE 04q~ ~ 8 STORY ~ ~ O / O ° x ot~tV oMV ~ ~ '~1 ' 6'CHAINL]Nt:lOIN'CE ~ MASONRY ~ o~ ~ CBS ~4°4~' I oMY b I oMV oMV oMV ~ I I ' 100.00' ?&,9T oh~V I I I 4 SPA 9$,$g 40.00' ti ~ I ~ z i i, DIRT CONC. ~ z I $ - O o $ U ~ ONE O 6 P G 3 ACES $Tpgy ~ ~ PP I MASONRY I htiy c CBS rn oMV ~ `C o ~ ~ ~ N ~ O ' E ~ ' i , ~ q`' ~ w I M l a ~ t~ - ~ ~ n N N j ~ n n O O ~ U '~,i O ~ C o. b ca `1 o z M o _ ° toooo' _ - - - ~ z _ _ _ . ~j~j.- PY~, SP O ACES 6WOODPENCE c 33' 93po i~ O,S ~ ~ - _ CONC. 19.93' e ' v rv 18.7T I 45.66' - 24.8' l0.7~' o ~ M~ a ,8 6WODDFENCE I N I\ 'y i 0.00' 1.63' ONE 8.00' ^ ~ p 7935 ~ 2 _ ,y COV.CONC.RAMP STORY y _ O MASONRY ~ 1 ~ AC[{FLOWDEVICE T/1 a 7.75' COV. ~ ' ~ ry CONC. I M ~ I I~ ONE 9.75 - 6.10' _ 44,x. a 0 a 8 I STORY ~ f 1993' a pp 19,63' MASONRY ~N~' ~ ~ c I ~ CBS ~ ' ' I ~4'CHAINI.II4gFINCE CDNC.S I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~z,~rALPOS7's LESS THE EAST 30' ' FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE NE ll4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN S 89° 40' S5" EAST, ALONG THE ~ o.~ s' ~ M I EAST-WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 200.0 FT. FOR - sD.ss suss lase' 18.46' lear rasa ~ ~ d P.O.B.; THENCE CONTBVUE 3 89 40 55 EAST, ALONG THEEAST _ R M WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 324.57 FT. TO THE t3s 136' COV. CONC t'36 1.3T X135 l3 nl I m ~ CENTERLINE OF KH,MERAVE.; THENCE N.1° 41' 28" EAST, o 0 0 0 " ~ ° ° o I a ~ o ~ 0 0 o I ~ ALONG THE CENTERLIIVE OF KHMER AVE., 330.03 FT. TO THE ~ ~ W • SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES FIlIST ADDITION AS RECORDED 1 P GSPA ~ ~ INPLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 55, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA. THENCE N. 89° 41' IS" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH P N r > > n b4 I O LINE OF SAID GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION, 32450 FT.; ~ o THENCE S.1° 02' 13" WEST, 330.02 FT. TO THE P.O.B. ~ 1'LA.w~occUPATIOxAL slcN ~ LESS THE SOUTH 50.0 FT. AND THE EAST 30.0 FT. FOR ROADRIGHT-OF--WAY. OCCUPAT[ONALSiININ 17.EC.BOX TOP SIGN DCVA~ W VALVE SANITARYMANHOLB I WATERVAL LIGt1TP0IE~0 1. ELEC. BOX DOWN GUY ~ scDxc.smBWALX~, FD.In"ca.R.a303s oLP ° ~ t cti coxc. - -------30.~IIt- ~ S 89 40 55 E 94.57 wATERVALUH 00 . s"xs" c.ns. i~oa i ATPnn~rERS ' ATERVAX.vE j SAMTARYMANHOLB ~I i WA GRATEINLBT C ~ HYDRANT i ~ I i O ~ O v+ ~ O i I S. 89° 40' S5" E. 200.00' EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF ! S. 89° 40' S5" E. 324.57 ' _ - - - ABPHAL7PAVHAffiVT ~ SW CORNER OF THE SEC.18, TWP. 29 S., RGE.16 E, P.O.B. - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD NE 1/4 OF SEC.18, TWP. 29 S, RGE.16 E. c 100 RIGHT-OF-WAY H ~ ~ m I W~ I a rn i . . FLOOD ZONE: "X" ACCORDING TO F.I.R.M. #125096.0128-G ABBREVIATIONS ' TYPE OF SURVEY: ' LAIVDORBOUNDARP USE; DESIGN Fn.Ftcx. -FODNDPKNAII. DATED:9-3-03 L.R PENNY L.R. PENNY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SN&D-SEfNAR.ANDDISC86539 P.CT4 =FODNDCONC.MON. ~=P1,pT ~ ~ 5IGNA • -14730-142NC Sa.R. =sETntoxllon1~39 Fn.xa~n. -FDUNnxAR,Armnrsc. ~ _p®,p NOUNDERGROUNDINSTALLATIONSORUYfPROVRMENTSHAVEBEENLOCATEDERCEPTASNOTED BASISOFFIELDBEARINGS: ADDRESS: 10730-102ND AVENUE NORTH LAUREN R PE R.L.S.#4931, scnT. -sETCONCRETBMONUnRAT B,RL -BENCHMAAB (Aq-MEASDRED NOINSTRUMENTSOFRECORDREFLECTINGEASEMENTS,RIGHTOFWAY,AND/OR OWNERSHIP EAST RIGHT-OF-WAYLRVE 2430 GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD JOB ~0 Q(~t}4"]' SEMIlVOI.E° F31L -FOI2mIRONROD rarer -LOWFSTFLOORI~EV. lCl .CALCULATED WEREFURNISBIDTOTHISSURVEYOREXCEPTASNOTEDANDfORSHOWN. KH,MERAVENUE • BATE: F ~ SEMINOLE, FLORIDA 33778 PHONE: (727) 398-4360 F.O.P. -FOUNDOPErIPB'E CARFI.EL. -OARACEFLOORELEF. PHONE: 2 FYB. -FOUND PINCH PIPE c.T..F. =CRAINLINKFENCE N) D®"~ BEING: N.Ol°00'21^E. CLEARR'ATER,FLORIDA ~ FH =FIRBITYDAANT TOB -TOP OFBANK ~ _ ]~1T V1~I.IU UI~E "FAX: ~~21 FAX: (727) 319-6051 LP -LICBTPOLE PP -troWERtroLE DRAWN BY• LP/LL ~ ~ ~SY LICENSED ] mv -n1oNIT(IRINCVALVE PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE CERTIFY T0: RDPHIE FANidY PARTNERSHIP ! ALBA CONSULTING CORPORATION ' COMIVIlTMENT POLICY ; ~ ? ~ . Ds LICENSED BUSINESS # 6539 _ : s,, ~~r,~S;: ? r ~4e6Sa~~• i i I ' i I I SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES ~ FIRST ADDITION PLAT B00 S2, PAGE 55 60 RIGHT-OF-WAP , SHELLEYSTRE ~ 77SAFPHALTPAVIIN@IT - ~ ~ I - _ - o N 89°41'18" W 324.50' NC.CATCHBASIN 3O 0 30 30 60 ~ o o ~ TOP stcN Is'vALLElrcoxB M I MULCH C. ASPHALT ~ 80 ~ ~ ~ ~ ° GP°ST Scales 1" = 30' 1" = 30' Fo.>n"GLR.k3749 N8 °41'18" W 294,50' PP 13 ~.ful PD.4"X4"CaLNOq - - - 40.00' BACRFLOWDEV[CE 4'H[GHCONC.WALL i i 4s~ eC~t[.wXr7;N 1494 I I ~ TRASH AREA ON CONC. ~ q~ DO G oMV I , ~ ti p~~q~' j ~ ONE 04C`" i 8 STORY ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 I ~ MASONRY x oMV oMV oMV i ~ ,7 ~ 6'CHAINLBZgFENCE ~ O,~R I ~ CBS ~4 oMV oMV h ~ b oMV aMV ' I ' I 100.00' ?9,$T ol~v ~ I 4 ARX[Y SPAC c 45,5 40.00' ti ~ 0 I ' DIRT CONC. ~ z o ~ ONE 8 6 P G s ALBS STORY °i - ~ MASONRY ~ I Jy C CBS oMV o ~ E9 ~ 00 a i I N ~ m I ~I i X40 F W ~I w a ~ t7 /1 M ry ~ ~ ~1 .I ~ c ~ b O H z ti M ~ I 100.00' ~ ~ - ~j I,p ACfC9 5 P G ACES 6 WOOD FBNCE 93T c ZY.48' O.S ~ _ CI t} o a a r. ~ 4.52: 45.60' ~ 24.8' I6.?,2' o 31.1E "1 ~ ~ ~ M ~ a 6' WOOD FENCE C ~ ~ M o° P ~ N ~ 20.0(M 7.68' ONE 8.00' b O - ~ 79.35 COV.CONC.RAMP STORY h I ' p MASONRY ~ _t i ~ ~ 7.75' ~ ACIO'LGR'DEVICE ~ a GOV. N a CONC. i N ~ i ONE LIGHT POLE h 9.75 06.10' ----~5-------~ STORY ~ 1993' 19.63' I MASONRY v ~ b CBS ' 4'CBAIN LR4g PENCB CONC. S I ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I A[.POSTs i FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE 4 F 1 T ~ ~ LESS THE EAST 30 NE 1! 0 SECTION 8, OWNSHIP II 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN S 89° 40 55 EAST, ALONG THE er o3s ~ ~ EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 200.0 FT. FOR zu.&s ~ ss ° I p P.O.B.; THENCE CONTINUE 3 84° 40' S5" EAST, ALONG THE EAST- 18.5°' [8.48' 18AT 1860' ~ I ~ p WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 32457 FT. TO THE ~yttt ,~Y Ids I•~' zo7' 136 I3r s13S ~ 13 ~ ~ y M CENTERLDE OF IQLMER AVE.; THENCE N.1° 01' 28" EAST, o 0 0 o q v, coxc. ' N o 0 o C ~ ~ ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF E7I.MERAVE., 330.03 FT. TO THE ~ a ~ ~e W I, SOUTH LINE OF GDLF TO BAYACRES FIItSTADDITI0NA3 RECORDED I c: 4 IN PLAT BOOI{52, PAGE 55, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF I P GseA ~ 00 PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N. 89° 41' 18" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH ~ P N LINE OF SAID GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION, 32450 FT.; h e4 I p ' THENCE S.1° 02' Li" I ° WEST, 330.02 FT. TO THE P.O.B. I • C LESS THE SOUTH SO.D FT. AND THE EAST 30.0 FT. FOR ROADRIGHT -OF-WAY. OCCUPA770NAL SIGN IN PLA WlOCCUPATIONAL SIGIQ ' ~ I I ~A w vAI.vE ~ EEC. aox ToP slGx I WATF.RVAL 5ANPPARYMANI[OLB LIGBTI'OLE~ ELEC. BOX pp~ GIIY i SCONC.SID ~ FD.1IL"C]]LR303s - I_ ~`'AL'~ S 89°40'55" E 294.57' wATmtvALVE ~ coxc. , s„~„ ~ 4.80 ~ P ~ ~roa i WATER Bff±TERS ' SANffARYMANHOLE ATERVA~.VE I i, WA TERS GRAT8INLET G ~ HYDRANT ~ I ORIGINAL. e o RECENED u'i o ~i I ~0 JUN 0 8 2006 S. 89° 40' S5" E. 200.00' EAST-WEST CENTER LINE OF ! S. 89° 40' SS" E. 24 i ~ 3 .S7 PIANN ABPDALTPAYBBDLNT ' SW CORNER OF THE SEC.18, TWP. 29 S., RGE.16 E. p,O.B. ~ - - ~ * - - - - - C(1Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD NE 1I4 OF SEC.18, TWP. 29 S., RGE.16 E. c 100'RIGHT-OF-WAP , H Wp . . ABBREVIATIONS FLOOD ZONE: "X" , ACCORDING TO F.I.RM. X125096.4128-G TypE OF S[1RVEY: LAND ORBOUNDARY DESIGN ' DATED: 9-3-03 U~' FD.PIr.x. -FDDNDexxAH, L.R. PENNY L.R. PENNY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. S.N8cD-SerNAD,ANDDI5Ctl6xt9 F.C.I1L =FOUND GONG MON. (p)=PLAT SIGNATURE: • S.Ln =SETDtoNROnr~39 FD.x.~D. =FGDNDxA¢ArmDUC. nrj-~ NOUNDERGRODNDINSTALLATIONSORTMPROYEMENTSHAVEBEENLOCATEDEXCEFTASNOTED BASIS OFFIELDBEARINGS: ~Dj~iss; 10730-102NI 9.GM.-SETCDNCRETEMONIRdENT Bas -BI?fCHMARK (I~-MEASURED NOINSfRIIMENTSOFRECORDREFLECfINGEASEMENTS,RIGHTOFWAY,ANDIOROWNERS~ EASTRIGHTAF-WAYLINE r~ LAURENRPENNYRL.S.#4931';°` SF.1?H<VOLE 10730-102ND AVENUE NORTH F.LR -FODNDBIONIIOD L.FL.EI„ -LOWFSTFLOORF•LEV. (C) •CALCDI,ATED ETLMERAVENUE 2430 GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD JOB NO.OG-O44f ~ F.OS. -FOONDaiPENPIPB CAB.FL.EL -GARAOEFLOORF,LEV. -DEEDID ~EFURNISHEDTOTH4SSURVEYOREXCEPTASNOTEDAND/ORSHOWN. DATE: 4/19/2006 PHONE: 72 SEDIINOLE, FLORIDA 33778 PHONE: (727) 3984360 FBY. -FOUND PDICHPBE ca.F. =CHABVLBVKFENCE BEING: N.oI°00'24°E, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA _ a - I FB =FIREITiDBANr Tos -TOeoFBANB ~ oTV IIIVLESS' FAX: (72' FAX: (727) 319-6051 ss LICENSED BUSINESS # 6539 LP -LICBTPDLE PP -1rowERPDLE :.."`at LICENSID: mv -nloxrrolmvcvALVB PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE COMNIITMENT POLICY CERTIFY T0: ROPHIE FAMII,Y PARTNERSHiP / ALBA CONSULTING CORPORATION DRAWN BY: LP/LL ' ; o~ & SF~I,EU. 1; ss ~Y, ,,r,, g~0• ; p£S