Loading...
FLD2005-05037 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE T NSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES_ NO X (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale , bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Please see Attachment "B & C" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Please see Attachment "B & C" 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Please see Attachment "B & C" 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Please see Attachment "B & C" 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see Attachment "B & C" 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Please see Attachment "B & C" ? Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how criteria is achieved, in detail: See Attachment "B & C" Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater I E JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI--\' CF CLEARWATER IVNI91H 17 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUB?WAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of ClWater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall including the following: - Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; - Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; - A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgment of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ? Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minium, a grading plan and finished floor elevation shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR If you have any questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750 F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; 13 PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a n t 6vIdN A L 13 COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; u \{ G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)-r.;.: ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ? All dimensions; ? North arrow; 1 ? Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ? Location map; JUL '- 8200 5 ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; `?.? i ? Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ? Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ? All required setbacks; j ? All existing and proposed points of access; SERVICES I ? All required sight triangles; Cl-- ' OF CLEARWATER - ? Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specim`en' trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of all public and private easemeil - Location of all street right-of-way within an adjacent to the site; Location of exiting public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening tper Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; ORIGINAL Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking space: total number, presented in tabular form with the number or required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; - - Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; D - - Impermeable surface ration (I.S.R.); and Floor area ration (F.A.R.) For all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (81/2 x 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan ? One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ? Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ? All open space areas; k- ? Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ? Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ? Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ? Structural overhangs; ? Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater reflecting size, canopy r JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-.l' OF CLEARWATER lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: ? All existing and proposed structures; ? Names of abutting streets; ? Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ? Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ? Sight visibility triangles; ? Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ? Proposed and required parking spaces; ? Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; ? Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; ? Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; ? Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; ? Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ? Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (81/2 x 11)(color rendered in possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLWUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ation 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue(e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (81/2 x 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? ALL EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? ALL PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals). 0 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). 0 Reduced signage proposal (81/2 x 11) (color), if submitting comprehensive Sign Program appli K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) 13 Include as required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is On the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ? Traffic Impact Study is included. SEE ATTACHED TRIP GENERATION 61" EDITION TRAFFIC VOLUME FOR PROJECT - Attachment "A". CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration at (727) 562-4750 L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representation made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representative to visit and photograph the property described in this applicati-qu-) of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swo 4an subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 fl to me and/or by "l,,LAA 9,-- p-C" who is personally know has produced as Notary public, -JO ftgf+ Colleen Stewart Crowe My commission expires: 4 My Commission DD365509 V-01 W Expires October 24, 2009 Page 5'of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005 - City of Clearwater 34 979171 A TA7LA1 PAGE:. 01 AMAVIT TO AbYrW= MOM 1. Tht p =Aw sa)t;fv &M EN and named tIH bWm*) dtk t ftatj dma? aragN CKdit a a plel 9 be 0* t trot N1 pmo&+ " tum deb FOP6* for moth a mww fw a: Q m&ft W694 R, Th-w o"QrM+Ifw+?f Ww?6M++ -w c.l --- w *mmo* . Af % rk. !? t a S . X e r no i ¦. Q+??7 +?Os?b) b +r"'b ? i r °? a aNtAtw1A Phi ' 4, ffW1}WM?Iwltta0b?affwwladblr+aY?baOR??dC?allder,tklaEDesaa?idwMdetl0111beaheusdsab6+ip9plr _ tl. 'f7t+d db+?bdit b the Awl rea moaa?e?Y Eyapf ? ??irM td glaSaaa lFta aptlaaRoa dM! 1ha oirnar?riaiee. Ci1? . of SM, I j ett%MtMptyob0sS+ p a nsep?wa), ?• a?d+o+?1r yoorab r,at a v* wtcv? *W - Kzr&j ' YAY+%-fY EMAU OF,- I'll X64 e?frv cF ?xW-1?? ? deu aP uqa do tea naLtlr wall= d* owwwwoom twn c AMRY K AA?g conMr E? of Tikq r. r ` i a ... .;ON E adri?+?+y`.•.?a'1'+.OMr"Kra sppe?swciWtar3b Y?wn?met+MMlw'+" , CE' 111 RpWRofR 1q"* M%*p§WAPB"W*Wat° JUL - 8 2005 j ' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CIS-' CF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 0 0 ATTACHMENT "D" A. Waiver to allow a 55' building height is being requested. A.1 With respect to side and rear setbacks, the proposed residential condominium project complies with the front setback of 25' and side setback of 10'. A.2 The increase in building height to 55' results in a building with a center landscape corridor as well as open space along Druid Road and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue which results in an increase in landscaping. The increase in height to 55' is significantly lower than the existing residential high-rise structure located north of Druid Road. A.3 Based on the zoning atlas map, the property surrounding the courtyard site is medium density residential. Therefore, the increase in building height to 55' is not an impediment. A.4 The proposed parking areas are located along the east and south property lines with a 48" fence and landscaping located between the parking spaces and property lines. There is no proposed parking along Druid Road and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue except at the proposed driveway locations which have a minimum 15' wide landscape buffer. A.5 The proposed dumpster is screened by a wall which complies with the City of Clearwater Standards and is located in the southeast corner of the site. In addition, there is proposed landscaping along the east and south sides of the dumpster walls. A.6 There are no structures located in the front setback except for the driveways. The front yards located along Druid Road and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue will have a 15' wide landscape buffer as well as a dry detention pond. The building has been located to place the parking area along the east and south property lines. There is no proposed reduction in the front setback. The proposed front setback of 25' complies with the HDR zoning district requirements. Based on field measures, the existing pavement of the Hidden Oaks Apartment community located east of the Courtyard community is located 21.5 Ft. from Druid Road right-of-way line. The existing sign for the Sunshine Towers community located south of the Courtyard community is located 12 Ft. from MLK Boulevard right- of-way line. The proposed reduction in setback of 15Ft. and 18.5 Ft. to the Courtyard pavement is in compliance with existing pavement structure along Druid Road and the proposed reduction is not out of character with the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed entry feature columns reduction in front setback of 10 Ft. & 5 Ft. is not out of character. Since the Courtyard project is located at the southeast corner of Druid Road and MLK Boulevard, the entry feature columns on each side of the driveways will create a point of arrival when approaching the MLK Boulevard and Druid Road intersection from the east and south. The proposed reduction (to pavement) and to the entry feature columns will not adversely affect adjacent property values. If the entry feature columns are a subject of objection to the City of Clearwater or adjacent property owners, they can be eliminated. ORIGINAL 'r ------- ,I JUL - 8 2005 ATTACHMENT "C" ?--- - - --? ANNINf-3 & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES D.1 The proposed Courtyard project consisting of 47 condominium units, will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties for the following reasons: 1. To the north of the Courtyard site (north of Druid Road), is a seventeen (17) story residential building with 156 units - Barbie Towers. Please see Attachment "B". 2. To the east of Barbie Towers is a five (5) story assisted living facility with 120 apartments- Madison Glen. Please see Attachment "B". 3. To the east and south of the Courtyard site is a residential community consisting of twenty three (23) two (2) story apartment buildings with 209 total units - Hidden Oak Apartments. Please see Attachment "B". 4. To the east of Hidden Oak Apartments is the Main Street Apartment community consisting of 214 units in three (3) story buildings. Please see Attachment "B". 5. To the south of the Main Street Apartment community are the Residence and Avalon communities. The Residence community consists of 114 units in a four (4) story building over structure parking. Please see Exhibit "E". The Avalon community consists of approximately 216 condominium units in two (2) and three (3) story buildings. Please see Attachment "B". 6. To the south on MLK Boulevard south of Hidden Oak Apartments, is the Lexington community which is an active 55+ community. There are approximately 300 units with the building being three (3) story in height. Please see Attachment "B". 7. South of the Lexington community on MLK Boulevard is a condominium project called Sunshine Towers. Sunshine Towers consists of aproximately 120 units in a five (5) story building over structure parking. Please see Attachment "B". 8. At the northwest corner of Druid Road and MLK Boulevard is an existing funeral home - Woody's Funeral Home. 9. To the west of the site across MLK Boulevard are single family homes with a zoning designation of office. 0 0 D.2 As discussed under General Applicability Criteria No. 1 (D.1), the majority of the properties surrounding the Courtyard site consist of apartment and condominium communities except for the property to the west of MLK Boulevard and the northwest corner of Druid Road and MLK Boulevard. The proposed Courtyard project is a residential condominium project, which is in harmony with the surrounding uses and will not hinder the value of adjacent properties. The Courtyard project will increase the land value of the community to the east, Hidden Oak Apartments, since the project is over 50 years old. In addition, the Courtyard project will tend to increase the single family lots to the west of MLK Boulevard. JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C;--? " CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 0 0 D.3 The Courtyard development is a residential community consistent with the residential neighborhood. There are two (2) driveways from the site, one (1) from MLK Boulevard and one (1) from Druid Road. In addition, there is an existing bus stop at the northeast corner of the site on Druid Road which will remain. Plus, there is an existing sidewalk along MLK Boulevard and Druid Road which serves the existing communities and the bus stop. Since the Courtyard community is consistent with the residential neighborhood, there are no proposed health or safety hazards caused by the Courtyard project. ORIGINAL 4 ' JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-.-Y OF CLEARWATER J • • DA The proposed Courtyard community is consistent with the City of Clearwater zoning regulations. To distribute traffic from the site, two (2) driveways are proposed. The first driveway is located on MLK Boulevard and the second on Druid Road. Both driveways are located as far as possible from the intersection of MLK Boulevard and Druid Road and are full access. With respect to sidewalks, there is an existing sidewalk along MLK Boulevard and Druid Road. The proposed project sidewalk will tie into the sidewalk on MLK Boulevard and Druid Road. There are proposed 47 condominium units with7l parking spaces. The site is allowed 48 units according to the City of Clearwater zoning map. ORIGINAL LL- ifL -' E L JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C+-.-%' OF CLEARWATER J 0 0 v D.5 The Courtyard community will consist of one (1) building with a center courtyard. The existing apartment and condominium residential buildings immediately surrounding the Courtyard project consist of two (2) to thirteen (13) story structures. Please see General Application Criteria #1 for a more detail discussion of the existing structures within the neighborhood. ORIGINAL v JUL - 8 2005 ' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-.-" OF CLEARWATEr D.6 The proposed Courtyard project will have a center courtyard within the interior of the building as well as the clubhouse attached to the main building. Plus the pool is located immediately adjacent to the main building. Since the center courtyard is interior to the main building as well as the clubhouse attached to the main building, noise to adjacent properties will be kept to a minimum. With respect to visual impacts, the proposed building complies with the required building front setbacks from MLK Boulevard and Druid Road. Since the project is a residential community, which is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood, hours of operation should be consistent with communities in the neighborhood. ORIGINAL CE JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CF-\' OF CLEARWATER WOODY-S FUNERAL HOME (ZONED OFFICE)OPGINAL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES + JUL 8 2005 ? PLANNING & DEVELO IME I T 1------------------ ---? SERVICES i - ^L EARWA71= R ' 17 STORY 5 STORY BUILDING i BUILDING , (BARBIE TOWERS) (MADISON i i GLEN) DRUID ROAD w z z w a a u Y w w D J Z H D' Q E 23 TWO (2) STORY BUILDINGS [HIDDEN OAK APARTMENTS) 3 STORY BUILDINGS I 4 STORY (LEXINGTON) I BUILDING (RESIDENCE) 5 STORY I 3 STORY BUILDING BUILDING (SUNSHINE TOWERS) (AVOLON) W > , Q ? K 13 WH E ? ATTACHMENT B 3 STORY BUILDING (MAIN STREET APARTMENTS) LOCATION MAP L? 1 -:. 71 r Y N I 4 1:r ? y"1 J i ..? s J . a.- .. r.? 7u ' Ift f Am- BARBIE TOWERS ATTACHMENT B • ;ei!r':.• .. a ?? ? ?T? • L doll ?mu-sno? MADISON GLEN . ..4 "11 r,?dL Li 1 j q--?-,? . . p 1 . 7 M x` ,?f ? 'dy MADISON GLEN r MA[ )ISON GLEN w . y' ?a Yayr c. d HIDDEN OAK APARTMENTS 1 • • T' :: fl??!4 "1?flA'i ?dOa ?e L ? GiaA:*?sarta':-?`". LEXINGTON 5 12:17 pm Maw 5 12:11 pm -wam AVALON yam. 001, I, a • 0 -- w?:- IW7sc?. JIIIIIAIIII ?? ' J ? I " .? m F I a "Wow M' AVALON AVALON 0 0 m ar FA I?!i;NUUiI R ¦on ? EE'E EF` ?.:, rl? ? ?INp 1 dig THE RESIDENCE F w? 5 12:06 PH-# --- i --77 2:06 Pm MAIN STREET APARTMENTS ¦„ , ??. r?r *Aim - MI n- r ? qq _ MEMO +f ?' ?•? LEXINGTON - o 01,0 s NOW- -0 lull4-, '? I , lii f IIII ?,I ?_ Illl Till llll I r.. ? i I Z- fig dN' ? ? I :i tJT I i; ?? I? •-'-1.11i1t; I I F j "' ?I ? i ??? ? .;? I I'I?:, ? I MMM IIII I' I I I I ?? " . ?:T? ?" ? THE RESIDENCE Itt; i ...I iii ' lily 11 n ' l v t?? II 111 ?? ¦?HIS?11/?'1??°' ???71 44'? rl???ll l: ,?In Ip?@?s .-,??• la'S?1 ? ?.? •' ? 1 t Iq ? 1 ?? +,? ryy q Rif THE RESIDENCE 000 • j-y Mae .o tit 41, } - -.: AVALON iy t, f v I'r« .l i 1 05 1 s - _'`+ ?x - A-am. o- PRIVATE I PROPERTY ! ???c } NO SOL:CIMG . "t NO i_RMS$UrGJ SUNSHINE TOWERS a ?-?? Yom. } •? l[?`t??}?/? ,,. 27, SUNSHINE %i t i a TOWLR, 3 • R IGINAL_. LEcF i JUL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-.-, "~ CLEARWATER # J 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 19 2905 pLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RZ ?Q? I .:JANr W,lfU ENIDS a• P"Z nlr6 to %wt; OAk-TqM 11=14" aA. 3- At. ViAgReV 11,111 11 1 HYIfi1w.", Ylh'!:S r2'rN'OM. ?" CA t. (NAIAD I LLAMA DAt 'AIAnl P' t 1 c"WO .7y ISlA 1rD pA t6 PAIMt L' CF y}Ah9D 1f1f}ISCUr 6 a. A, YnIp1r Fux rAtl PAf? r s: 1o"e, A. tRlp14 GOYfA,L PAIA" It- 14' e.A? VA0<iYlfen 1r6USfrum} 3 Ln 1- Arelh} 6n Amt tYORH A 6n }- µnu111crn. (i00)14Y -J IN 110L MMU11 WOO SLM, 601.0 Ai.440MA 1 6 ,4 L. punPId IANU.A 1 ap t_ VSRLHIUv^ JW PL•1r1V- 4G1AL cYPrfa ROnr nhuIcH pr.pAnNMO.1 0P pt401114 fetal IF 6}.boM nn s+, pDtwi-twu sea pooor?npur 3- o.A ey +ae AMA a? `7w --1- ro uv /?. p 1 --------- DRUID ROAD ------- --------------------- - - _5 - ? I I--------- --- - - - - - - ----_ _- I I ij I I '? ? l I ! -) . . I w Lr I ?a? I i lc? I lII1 I I ; i _ I I I _ YI P Y I ? ? O O ( i I j cz I LAJ ,.1 'r ' ? ir' 7-71 1 i I , I I I ¢.?? J 0 I1\ i 1 m I Z 7t r I I I O O ""' ? I "'° I 1. I o o I? I ? I I :sP ? ? I I - - - - / I _ ?.? ?? ----- --- -- p-- - -I off. / ----------------- ----- )---------- LEGEND MD PROPOSED PROPOSE _o_. o e aMM TO CIR 59 Mr 91-111 IR bL ?01910 0 CM 02 DIMMER is 06100 01ROT Man ao Ho 0 20 ao 15 5 • GRAPHIC SCALE TE DATA NOTES E CLIENT: PROJECT NAME: sec. 15 TWP. 995 RNO 13E PROJECT NO GATE BY REVISIONS DRAWING TYPE DRwwN?ar- awa u"aE NUMBER cNCCNED a "V, DRUID COURTYARD M-1160 a? a.e.<ua CLEARWATER. L.L.C. THE COURTYARD „„ ; ?o„" '"wRr wppROVEDr II1? HOB URC R, INC. ST RUCTION 2 SWIM MMSDURI AVE SURE SCALE PROlS850NAL BNGRtEBRING RE90 SITE AND STRIPING PLAN w "" "" CLEARWATER. FL 33756 Y-PO, a .. _ e m. -- mv??i yM ?m vom d® hpw n® BPOORi ?D?9 h SAO O RECORD °-•-•?? r7. ?.? T!- PARR,CACC C .?SI?RU''e..•?, DC." T .?.. I QY,L w. is?sSs vi iSiY4? u?3'?var? I ?a,-r I R:F' c?a-r -ii ?!MC ? a.rmrc t[r'S ,+ecF F?•+?R rt._ cg?y L.L Q L 1 ? Z N a LJ N N W CL U Q 3 Q J W U - - rr ems.. .? ;,TF PLAN • 0 20 10 0 20 40 la 5 CRIPAIC SC?IE.- _ ..._.__..._. ? tom.::,.., 20 10 0 20 40 t. ?m 15 SCRARRIC SCALE m.° m 2:J1 a viai= $. ?vcia a.x,YVmt eesa u: s c:rsaas `.z ivaeess's+.a? One.. naw vd urYm im Y eB'? Uww?im Me.? ..? R V ? u ?..? •? ? •4a?e ?..? re?w-ti,.y ""mss-tit •A'?y3j. kr"zr,?^ a ?,'i i i_"? 333?=s?.r -?w7/. Jlr "le ?.1N ••w41.? cIM.•zc.JS M1CVARWAICR, FL ., 10 20D y., _ O. 0 PROJECT 11 THE COURTYARD 1105 DRUID ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33156 '5 BAR VERT. WALL REINF. GOVT. TO BOND BEAM. EMBED ACI $TD. HOOK b° IN BOND BEAM. GROUT CELLS SOLID. FRAME PAN AREA FOR SLAB 4" CONC. SLAB FINISH FLOOR ORIGINAL AT BOTH SIDES FHA a" x a" OIL X-$-'- POURED---i CONC. BLOCK W/ 1 05 ROD 1. ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR IN i POURED SOLID EXISTING vERGIN SOIL 2. ADJUST HEIGHT OF FOUNDATION OPEN FOR STEMWALLS OR MONO-POUR AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH N TREE - ROOTS . ABOVE REQUIRMENT. MIN. a IIII?IIL?III?III=_ - - - OF ?? 111?111?111?111= - Q BELOW IIII?III?III?II GRADE I????I I I??f?I?????L III I??II?III tll II I?I?II??lll I??? 36 X 16" W CONIC. FTG SEE SITE ! W/ (4) *5 RODS SEE SITE PLAN _ _PLAN- FOR COURSE -? OF BLOCK ABOVE STD, STEM WALL 10" X 20" W/ (3) w5 RODS ON CHAIRS GONT, SECTION "A - A" TREE ROOT DETAIL M.T.S. SEE SITE FLAN FOR ALL DIM, BUILDER- D ° UP COURTYARD L,L,C, 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE SUITE 106 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33156 9 LL JUL - 8 2005 II PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES L_ C11' OF CLEARWATER i ECEIVED ORIGINAL MAY 192005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° CITY OF CLEARWATER CONCRETE TILE TOP " PROPOSED CAST BRASS NAME PLATE Ar r Art TILE INSERT ALL SIDES LIGHT STUCCO NUMBER 8„ FINISH 12" BELOW GROUND O D D D D o oD oD T•4" INDICATES TILLED (ELI EROA EOOIR UP ro HE OEM W/ (ONC 8 (1) #5 ROD VERT. ALI PLACES SHOWN 2T AIN. LAPPING 8" CAU 8" LARGE! AT RASE ?I I iYPICAI (1) *5 BAR IN FILLED CELL im EA. CORNER OF COLUMNS m 11-4" X 11-4" X 21-0" FTG, WI(5)05,s 12" O/C, EACH WAY ON CHAIRS PROPOSED COLUMN AT ENTRANCE 4'-R" I 1= ----------- @ ? ? o 1:1 o F@l ? ? ? ? ? 0?@ 0 a?o o ? a ? ? i ? f ILLfD CILL C.' • NORTH ELEVATION ORIGINAL JUN 0 7 "21,05 pV.,,,J?.t ? S Dr,MARTMENIT Clt??C ?;l..Aml_ 0 0 ORIGINAL E SOUTW ELEVATION • • EAST ELEVATION ORIGINAL JUN 0 7 2OG5 ILI • ORIGINAL • W E 6 T ELEVATION JUN 0 7 2005 • US!_: SPANISH "S" RED An Inheritance That Speaks For Itself ow mom• JUN. 0 7 2005 6801 N.W. 77th Avenue, Suite 301, Miami, FL 33166-2832 Tel.: (305) 471-5830 Fax: (305) 471-5833 1-800-54 TILE 1 www.altusa.com ORIGjNi?L Alb, Uasslc Agea Pcegance gggA {1 _?a 3 It ?i aP ROOF COLOR C ALT USA CLAY TILES) 7Q P SPANISH (S) FUME r n : - ---.-' '- - -'- - -- --' - 0 u I -v 2)111 111 111 s a 111 (2) --, W E -'- -'-' - zO \ ?? 111 ,? a???? ro ru rs? ru ro ........... - 111 111 ru m ru -. M ? 111 [000] -- - - - -- - ? ?? 111 ? `n . ME 1 !L-9_• m l I) BUCKSKIN 4449 (2) CHINA WHITE " 310 C 1) BUCKSKIN 044S 9 a (lt (TYPICAL) SANDBLAST Q O T N E ? E v O O ° DRYVIT FINISH SYSTEM t? SHEET NO, r4-3 o Y ROOF COLOR l ALT USA CLAY TILES) gggg r e SPANISH (S) FUME ° +f t ? .I :r Fri ir: -- --------------- ----------- {f Ili ])110 HBO rz? & BOB 9 ? i (L -- - _ t fQ + Q rjr xµ?p+ a ?? fU fU _'- - - - r 0! IBM ? 9 gg ru ru -------------- nz ro u ',.I 4 q ml , " I I l I) BUCKSKIN "449 (2) CHINA WHITE " 310 l I) BUCKSKIN »449 ? a g O ?VIf1Iy ???_,?? `-"' T "" M L E tJ A ? T O 0 o l TYPICAL J SANDBLAST FINISH DRYVIT STUCCO SYSTEM E n U ?y 6-6-2005 SHEET NO, A-4 q 0 de?? h e - - ................ ! - ROOF COLOR ( ALT USA CLAY TILES) SPANISH (S) FUME i Sl `? ?8Q ! Q oo III pow owc 1- 2) (2) ?.. a a -ii' WI, a o i. - (2) t auL, B o 2) a ® ? ; l2) o (2) ? N o r2 ----- ) (U -- (I) (2) (2) ? NN g a Bo a o ru o o o ? FBI ? ? ? WaQ a - - _?u-- ---- ---- ------ _ - - ------.-. -.- (1) ru I I no no Ro I - fl) - [9 10 ng 10 4 1 no I I I F01 FBI ? ? l1) !.!i?({•!!';? ;:;%i l:ltiX1[114 ? 1 [? ? ? ? 191 ? It m ? V ? o o ? on o ? ...... . . .......... 4 (1 ) BUCKSKIN 0449 (2) CHINA WHITE • 310 (1) BUCKSKIN +449 Q 9a rc d n ? ? tJ M O 0 (TYPICAL) SANDBLAST FINISH DRYVIT STUCCO YSTEM L r U 3Q'U• K BHEEt NO. AL ?? O 01 raP m ' •q worn oaK ROOF COLOR ( ALT USA CLAY TILES ) SPANISH (8) FUME J V-10 no 1,2) fU (U (Z) 3-Iff-ung o a a aolid[a ? ? no ? ? ? ? 101 no o (!) a (!) o a (!) ? ? ???D? ? ??D? ? A-1.?._00 00 0 0 0? ?®®® ? ? ???D? ------ ------- (1) BUCKSKIN *44S (2) CHINA WHITE 0310 (1) BUCKSKIN 0449 (TYPICAL) SANDBLAST FINISH 6 T E (III n E \\? f// n „ A T o II IWI II (C?`?= DRYVI7 STUCCO SYSTEM Y b ev..rAecn,..u owe• TMreu.ou .®..,.?N;L''weree ?. ?.a.' ,,... •r.u:>,.... ewe. •ro. weiw•, ?ZSUILDING SECTION A-5 FIVE UNIT - FIVE STORIES eeae . V4%1W a PROPOSED COLUMN AT ENTRANCE CONCRETE TILE TOP ?- PROPOBED CAST BRASS i-- NAMEPLATE (U e5 BAR IN FILLED CELL • EA. CORNER OF COLUMNS 1'-4" X 7.4" X 2'O" FT& W/(5)-5 • 13" O/C. EACH WAY ON CHAIRS W I Z_ A T U U ? . ' i c _ lip ------... a I t I O p' IMP U A T R I U M k A T R I U M ?" " 5 6 Sql :mmm -39 . . , , n parr ' O , ?avmP. ..ti w,.?... .... ? r 5 d y N E Q O r r :---------- , ? NORTH ti SHEET NO. N OT E, S PRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIRED z /? P ER UNITS AND BUILDINC S 3 Q A-1 nI? nIl)nn` 0 T W P . + ER NFPA-13 •I-S-2005 9 W 0 nn? m0R7N 00° T ° 00 O O a1 D& 7 (r an {{r Q NORTH a° It o,. Q l7 z 0 hva,d 1by mw 11iTt1RN to R.4..A W. W*4"' L;" Wiwi, fat d f-,w.l"s. P-A. 401 t?" Uroetn Awmu0 Ckwwk4>Z, 3a'SA TU 4;.a12.W THIS INDENTURE, .,,eurw,.W„ r.+r KM wY.rMrftw 1rwr;M w ?(+k rltttoKnw.ln M?+le?e?bul,rwlkeNulNfad?r.14w1?r .Viak? ? , ORIGINA ?l61Atltlti ?.F? p ??ifh7'y ???T of-mar m* Mods chit 26th J y J1,13, 2WS sr:t.?tt ROBERT W. WIL;COW dad WAN 1. Wj"ON, 7ras kw oodor' etas P42IRT W W!> 90N LIVING TRUST AGRE>r 04T &tcd Scovitt1 v 1% 1002, whew ttt, 1WV vAdrut is: P.O. Boo 185, ClcsswoW, Fle.fde 337:57 ramp of & Am part, rrd CLI3ARWAI12R LANG} L,Tb, o Tax&% Umitcd Partrwr.da , whaso mailiap iddrm is:' , 7480 W o Porkw1Y, Scu1o 114, D#11os, T w+ IS297 PMW of tho soond port. Wiomp"Kk, that dw vosd party trt•0+0d,t pwi, tqr we iv evrei --same c&Aa m d Tea 0W1mn and nllw wd alsd vatvebla wsandatr4:vr,s,10? m hand paid dY tlrc atsiid ' at t11C eesond P tic +eeo?N whaaaE it he>areby ocknc++irlc geed. his 8rv*d, tw1gised mid sold to 010 aid paty t{thv ,used W.1a cyan, A0 f4owitg t60lvibai 181K Ai5ulte V* and beterg i+s Yha Ctnmry t7{ ltinc]lef, STMIC t(1Flotida: W Wir StardrtQ at d*NW t!etraar or4w bT Va of t1 a SW 1A, ISl2 I/ sad can 50TY12" EIris 09" tfw Rdd 4I1-Wt• hsvo 295.16 R., s Aws Soren OW34 Wca 143,16 fcct; tlrortca North 64'03'~2" Wpt295,1 ti he% 1lK= Noah "W" East 295.16 tcw io the P.O.R, ku c4..vrarattst fer rW*of--way ef Graetwaod l?vasm ad t7rAd UagL IAN *04 oYtqA *at Pardon eaaTeyed to Ow cio of Clatrwater in OR Book WK, Tt1go #59, sP0Hc ltacqt'dt a!'><int:llao CovW, FlorNo. Mim PRE awodmxwly 2651/255 wf t ttt?" 1 ? °,9Parrt' approiaad's Foile Ldc?f>eNaa.? Ido. • s , i yv r t s ? eannrt i ear, i a3 nn VMS 16 NOT STYE ElO1sd86 E AD 1PAd2 T'v OF THE rJ-R.Atdrt71tS h7A *0 and pvw of t+ke"rw 4004 htrdby my,ra rmw the vwomm'said lava; send will4efeed A tr "NI ymm 11th 1aw(b! atei++nn of au posi+etts: e>`iptetacvcr, CITY A4 to Cks aw hweb7 ow,a wOtf vh!k field C vrW'ec **L 'b& prsgtm it lur<Uly !sized cd said land m iaa Au30 i llrst the Crordw bpi pod r,,1i+t and 6wfipl wdw.:tr so act red avAy :dad land; that Hut Grobf hereby lAtnY warrens dad ti$e to tH JW cad Ta dsfcgd 6u gears WbUt the ;swfal t WMI of an FmKffd Nfiatuewe'var; GM tht11; mW land is fto of s11 oaaMUvim-, S=Pt texW wznoos tstibaogv d im amber 31, x063 sad CUPWlrh and emtrit>bnsti of t000rd. Is g W'kuwt du wid wv of dto fins Pw bee fmw scso iwmw is m be widrtcd la rte In= aotd M W A W by dt "WO ~10=11, *4 dq Ed ytsef obg-- Witt= Ste, StaW mA DdWamd In Oer fteawtw I .fin try rr ? ' ?lzA7` ut"rho Pww W.W. Wttfan L ivinr•Trp t Awvw- nt ckttd wjk- tl y f MLSON, TmAw tpsiae at It 4m, W. wiboa u'ivA 1lsust Ayemeg "ad &Ptxtbv 11,:062 STA-TI OF FLORMA coUMT OF FINBLEAS The f=ais"<1 icu mu.tu we so mpad iSd bckft wa tity! day of Jamery, 21K)5 by Rt rma W. K Trmfto. who Aire pzcs y x?p n to mo M ba n pindsStW 1Trivtt'' L$c?tm of ot?cr _ l51+t6 &bmav M:atsfr?Mr?" . 4 ?-. ?l• ?, C?s:t?rs tt h itL mcw? Pubilo ::"HVED Y 1 u 2005, DEPARTMENT CLEARWATER THE COURTYARD 0 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR 47 DWELLING UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 5-6-05 ORIGINAL DRIVE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT WAY RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 5.86 3.09 1.00 275 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 0.07 0.00 1.00 4 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 0.37 0.00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 0.44 0.69 1.00 21 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.36 0.00 1.00 17 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 0.18 0.00 1.00 8 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 0.54 0.76 1.00 25 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 5.67 3.10 1.00 266 PK HR ENTER 0.25 0.00 1.00 12 PK HR EXIT 0.22 0.00 1.00 10 PK HR TOTAL 0.47 0.71 1.00 22 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 4.84 2.71 1.00 227 PK HR ENTER 0.22 0.00 1.00 10 PK HR EXIT 0.23 0.00 1.00 11 PK HR TOTAL 0.45 0.70 1.00 21 Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Gener ation, 6th Edition, 1997. RECEIVED MAY 19 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS ATTACHMENT A ? PEER 0 ORIGINAL Professional Engineering Resources, Inc:'' Engineering, Planning, Permitting May 9, 2005 Ms. Alba Maas Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637 RE: The Courtyard City of Clearwater / Pinellas County PEER Job No.: 03-1460 Dear Ms. Mass: Please find enclosed the below information for an Environmental Resources Permit application for the above referenced project. (A) Four (4) sets of Engineering Construction Plans signed and sealed. (B) Four (4) sets of Drainage Calculations signed and sealed. (C) Four (4) Environmental Resource Permit Applications with Sections C & H (D) Six (6) Notice of Receipt of MSSW Permit Application with attachments (E) A check in the amount of $800.00 made out to the Southwest Florida Water Management District. (F) Four (4) photocopies of the Warranty Deed. Thank you for your professionalism and diligence in assisting me with this project. MIV. Lenna,.E. cc: Mr. Nick Ferraioli w/o enclosure enc PVS/csc PAWPDOM2003 JOBS\03-1460\PERMITS\sw wmdSUBMIT.wpd RECEIVED MA's 1 y ?005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 646 94th Avenue North • St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2463 (727) 576-2007 • Fax (727) 576-3537 • E-Mail: peer@tampabay.rr.com • 0 STORMWATER NARRATIVE FOR ORIGINAL THE COURTYARD The proposed stormwater detention pond is designed to be dry with a depth of 3 feet. The stormwater detention pond has been designed to the 25Yr-24Hr storm event. The pond is located in the northwest portion of the site and discharges to Druid Road. The detention pond will have an outfall structure with a skimmer as well as an underdrain system to treat the water quality volume. There are no wetland or tree masses on the site. Enclosed with the submittal package are three (3) sets of Drainage Calculations. The Drainage Calculations have also been submitted to the Southwest Florida Water Management District for review and approval. RECEIVED MAY 19 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • COURTYARD 50YR - 24HR STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS • fb ATTACHMENT A • • PRE-CONDITION N A,PRE-CONDITION,50YR-24 k UNIT HYtROGRAPH FILE...... SCS_256 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... 1.6 WEIGHTED SCS CURVE NUMBER.... 39.0 INITIAL ABSTRACTION FACTOR... 0.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.73 FILE.... BAITE50 INPUT ID 112012159 TYPE.... RNF0002 RUN, HRS 28.4 DT, HRS. 0.1 DATA PTS 285 STORM... SCS_IIM DURATION 24.0 RAINFALL 10.0 EXCESS.. 2.0975411 ACREAGE. 1.6 TC, HRS. 0.73 TP, HRS. 12.7 ACFT VOL 0.279'557 READY... YES CFS TOL. 0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 GENERATE RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH OFFSITE BASIN 1,PRE-CONDITION,50YR-24HR UNIT HYDROGRAPH FILE......... SCS_256 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... 0.16 WEIGHTED SCS CURVE NUMBER.... 72.19 INITIAL ABSTRACTION FACTOR... 0.2 TIME .OF CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.69 FILE.... OSB1P50 INPUT ID 112012153 TYPE.... RNF0002 RUN, HRS 28.2 DT, HRS. 0.1 DATA PTS 283 STORM... SCS_IIM DURATION 24.0 RAINFALL 10.0 EXCESS.. 6.5116301 ACREAGE. 0.16 TC, HRS. 0.69 TP, HRS. 12.5 PEAK CFS 0.371052 ACFT VOL 0.086728 READY... YES CFS TOL. 0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 srx TYENTY FOL FIFTY Y RETURN P RAINFALL L r------Z.7 r 1 I 9.01 8.0 10 0 to 20 30 SCALE MILES 10.0 f RAINFALL CONTOUR IN INCHES. ri0 j BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA r (MATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - COUNTY BOUNDARY D-10 r L ? t ? 1 I ? i ? t ? t r , t t ?l t? La I - FIGURE D-6 ' SO FLORIDA WATER MENT DISTRICT • • POST-CONDITION 0 0 POSTTI.BRN Report Covering C:\DBRN3\03-1460.WBS\POSTTI.BRN Created.: Wed Mar 30 06:50:23 2005 Revised.: Tue Jul 12 11:33:28 2005 Executed: Tue Jul 12 11:33:41 2005 Project Run Converged. Prepared By PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 9800 4TH ST. N., SUITE 308 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA Project Contains 7 Paths. Project Contains 7 Nodes. Project Contains 0 Sgnls. ---------------------------------------------------------- Pathl up Stream Node Name (Down Stream Node NamelPath Type ----+---------------------+---------------------+--------- 0 BASIN A DETENTION POND A DIRECT 1 OFFSITE BASIN 1 GRATE INLET A DIRECT 2 DETENTION POND A OUTFALL STRUCTURE ORIFICE 3 DETENTION POND A OUTFALL STRUCTURE RECT WEIR 4 OUTFALL STRUCTURE GRATE INLET A PIPE 5 GRATE INLET A DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE PIPE 6 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE DRUID ROAD ORIFICE -------------------------------------- Nodel Name Node Type -----& - ---------------------+--------- 0 BASIN A SUBAREA 1 DETENTION POND A POND 2 OFFSITE BASIN 1 SUBAREA 3 OUTFALL STRUCTURE JUNCTION 4 DRUID ROAD STAGING 5 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE JUNCTION 6 GRATE INLET A JUNCTION ------ Nodel ------------------- Name ----------------------- Node TypelMin E1. at ------------- Hr.IMax El. at Hr. --- --+---------+--------------+---------- ------ 0 BASIN A SUBAREA 45.00 0.0 45.00 0.0 1 DETENTION POND A POND 41.52 0.0 44.86 14.4 2 OFFSITE BASIN 1 SUBAREA 45.00 0.0 4 . 0 0.0 3 OUTFALL STRUCTURE JUNCTION 39.94 0.0 40.96 12.5 ---------------------------------------------------------- Elevations in Feet, Nodes marked with an '*' have Flooded. ------------------------------------------------- Network Summary (US Std); Page 1 of 2 QQ s i ° C- 0-1 %? 'o So y R- L?1 1.tA. 5"Z'oR.? 0 POSTTI.BRN ----------- Nodel ---------------- Name ------------------ (Node TypelMin El. --------------- at Hr.IMax E1. ---------- at Hr. ----+---------------------+---------+--------------+------- --------- 4 DRUID ROAD STAGING 40.00 0.0 40.00 0.0 5 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE JUNCTION 39.50 0.0 40.91 12.5 6 GRATE INLET A JUNCTION 39.84 0.0 40.95 12.5 Elevations in Feet, Nodes marked with an '*' have Flooded. Nodel --------- Name I ---------- Maximum ------------- CFS Inflow I --------- Maximum -------------- CFS Outflow ----+ ---------------------+ ----------------------+ ------- -- ------- ------I 0 BASIN'A 7.40 @ 12.20 Hours 7.40 @ 12.20 Hours 1 DETENTION POND A 7.40 @ 12.20 Hours 0.66 @ 14.40 Hours 2 OFFSITE BASIN 1 0.37 @ 12.50 Hours 0.37 @ 12.50 Hours 3 OUTFALL STRUCTURE 0. 14.40 Hours 0.66 @ 14.40 Hours 4 DRUID ROAD 1)0 @ 12.50 Hours 0.00 @ 0.00 Hours 5 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE 1.00 @ 12.50 Hours 1.00 @ 12.50 Hours 6 ------ GRATE INLET A ---------------------- 1.00 @ ---------- 12.60 ------- Hours ------ 1.00 -------- @ - 12.50 -------- Hours ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Summary (US Std); Page 2 of 2 • POSTTI.BRN Report Covering C:\DBRN3\03-1460.WBS\POSTTI.BRN Created.: Wed Mar 30 06:50:23 2005 Revised.: Tue Jul 12 11:33:28 2005 Executed: Tue Jul 12 11:33:41 2005 Project Run Converged. Prepared By PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 9800 4TH ST. N., SUITE 308 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA ---------------------------- Path 000 ID 1109000561 Type DIRECT US Std -------------------------- 00 DIRECT..---------- 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE YES 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. 45.000 Ft ---------------------------- Pa st - C o Is 7?i-i ?? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 1 of 8 • f POSTTI.BRN ---------------------------- Path 001 ID 1109000621 Type DIRECT US Std -------------------------- 00 DIRECT..---------- O1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. 45.000 Ft ---------------------------- -------------------------- Path 002 ID 1120298625 Type ORIFICE US Std 00 Crest El 44.850 Ft 01 Length.. 3.080 Ft 02 Width... 2.000 Ft 03 Shape... RECTANGLE 04 Pct Open 78.280 Pct 05 Weir C.. 3.200 06 Orfc C.. 0.600 07 Handle.. Name 08 --------- --------- ----- 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 HW PE/KE YES 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 --- Max TW.. ---------- 45.000 --------- Ft ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 2 of 8 % ! f POSTTI.BRN ---------------------------- Path 003 ID 1120215292 Type RECT WEIR US Std -------------------------- 00 Crest El 41.930 Ft 01 Width... 0.390 Ft 02 Weir C.. 3.200 03 Num Ends 2 04 ----------------------- 05 Breadth. Ft 06 ----------------------- 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 HW PE/KE YES 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. 45.000 Ft ---------------------------- -------------------------- Path 004 ID 1121179773 Type PIPE US Std 00 Length.. 11.0 Ft 01 Mann N.. 0.009 02 Rise.... 1.000 Ft 03 Span.... 1.000 Ft 04 Inlet------- ------- ---- 05 Invert.. 39.940 Ft 06 Ent Ke.. 0.200 07 Outlet------ ------- ---- 08 Invert.. 39.840 Ft 09 Ent Ke.. 0.200 10 ------------ ------- ---- 11 BW Steps 0 12 ------------ ------- ---- 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 --- Max TW.. ------------- 45.000 ------- Ft ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 3 of 8 M • POSTTI.BRN Path 005 ID 1121181771 Type PIPE US Std -------------------------- 00 Length.. 67.0 Ft 01 Mann N.. 0.009 02 Rise.... 1.000 Ft 03 Span.... 1.000 Ft 04 Inlet------------------ 05 Invert.. 39.840 Ft 06 Ent Ke.. 0.200 07 Outlet----------------- 08 Invert.. 39.500 Ft 09 Ent Ke.. 0.200 10 ----------------------- 11 BW Steps 0 12 ----------------------- 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. 45.000 Ft --------------------------- - -------------------------- Path 006 ID 1121181743 Type ORIFICE US Std 00 Crest E1 40.850 Ft 01 Length.. 4.080 Ft 02 Width... 3.080 Ft 03 Shape... RECTANGLE 04 Pct Open 78.280 Pct 05 Weir C.. 3.200 06 Orfc C.. 0.600 07 Handle.. Name 08 --------- --------- ----- 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 --- Max TW.. --------- 45.000 ---------- Ft ------ -------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 4 of 8 0 0 POSTTI.BRN No( Tyl 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ------------------- ie 000 Name BASIN A )e SUBAREA Subarea.. BAP050 File File ID#• 1120121394 Alt Type. RNF0002 Run Time. 25.600 Hrs Delta T.. 0.100 Hrs NumData.. 257 Pts Storm.... SCS_IIM File Duration. 24.000 Hrs Rainfall. 10.000 In Excess... 8.159 In Area..... 1.600 Ac TC....... 0.250 Hrs TP....... 12.200 Hrs Peak Flow 7.398 CFS Volume... 1.087 AcFt Executed. YES -------------------------- Input# 1121182399 US Std ------------------------- Flood El. 45.00 Ft ------------------------ ------------------------ + ------------------------ Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage TO. X Coord.. Ft Y Coord.. Ft Ft ------------------------------------------------------ Node 001 Name DETENTION POND A Input# 1120221242 Type POND US Std ---------------------------------------------------- OOITop El... 45.000 Ft Top Area. 0.260 Ac E1....... Ft Area..... Ac E1....... Ft Area..... Ac E1....... Ft Area..... Ac E1....... Ft Area..... Ac E1....... Ft Area..... Ac El....... Ft Area..... Ac El....... 44.000 Ft Area..... 0.220 Ac El....... 43.000 Ft Area..... 0.190 Ac El....... 42.000 Ft Area..... 0.170 Ac Bot El... 41.520 Ft Bot Area. 0.150 Ac ------------------------ + ------------------------ Top Perim Ft Side %Per Pct Mid Perim Ft Base %Per Pct Bot Perim Ft ------------------------ + ------------------------ Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage TO. 41.520 Ft X Coord.. Ft Y Coord.. Ft --------------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 5 of 8 • • POSTTI.BRN ------------------------------------------------------ Node 002 Name OFFSITE BASIN 1 Input# 1121182408 Type SUBAREA US Std ---------------------------------------------------- 00 Subarea.. OSB1P50 File Flood El. 45.00 Ft 01 File ID#. 1120121531 ------------------------ 02 Alt Type. RNF0002 03 Run Time. 28.200 Hrs 04 Delta T.. 0.100 Hrs 05 NumData.. 283 Pts 06 Storm.... SCS_IIM File 07 Duration. 24.000 Hrs 08 Rainfall. 10.000 In 09 Excess... 6.512 In 10 Area..... 0.160 Ac 11 TC....... 0.690 Hrs 12 TP....... 12.500 Hrs 13 Peak Flow 0.371 CFS 14 Volume... 0.087 AcFt 15 Executed. YES 16 ------------------------------------------------- 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS T0. Ft 18 X Coord.. Ft IStage Y Coord.. Ft ------------------------------------------------------ --------------- Node 003 Name ----------------------------- OUTFALL STRUCTURE Input# ---------- 1112123001 Type JUNCTION -------------- ----------------------------- US Std --------- 00 Flood El. 45.000 Ft 01 ----------- ------------- 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ------------------------------------------------- 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS ( Stage T0. Ft 18 X Coord.. --------------- Ft Y Coord.. ----------------------------- Ft ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DataDump (US Std); Page 6 of 8 • • POSTTI.BRN ---- No ---------- de 004 Name -------------- DRUID ROAD ------- --------- Input# ---------- 1112123940 Typ e STAGING ------- ------- --------- US Std --------- --- 00 ---------- Flood E1. ------- 45.000 Ft IPE to KE. NO 01 ------------------------+------------------------ 02 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 03 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 04 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 05 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 06 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 07 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 08 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 09 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 10 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 11 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 12 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 13 ------------------------+------------------------ 14 15 16 ------------------------+------------------------ 17 Base Flow CFS Stage TO. 40.000 Ft 18 ---- X Coord.. ---------- Ft -------------- Y Coord.. ---------------- Ft ---------- ----------------------------------------------------- Node 005 Name DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE Input# 1112123948 Type JUNCTION US Stdl 00 Flood El. 45.000 Ft 01 ------------------------ 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ------------------------+------------------------ 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage TO. Ft 18 X Coord.. Ft Y Coord.. Ft ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 7 of 8 0 0 POSTTI.BRN ---------- ------------------------------------------- Node 006 Name GRATE INLET A Input# 1112125851 Type JUNCTION US Std ---------------------------------------------------- OOIFlood E1. 45.000 Ft 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ------------------------ + ------------------------ Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage TO. X Coord.. Ft Y Coord.. Ft Ft -------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 8 of 8 BASIN A,POST-CONDITION,50YR-24HR UNIT HYDROGRAPH FILE......... SCS_256 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... 1.6 ;IEIGHTED SCS CURVE NUMBER.... 85.03 INITIAL ABSTRACTION FACTOR... 0.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.25 FILE.... BAP050 INPUT ID 112012139 TYPE.... RNF0002 RUN, HRS 25.6 DT, HRS. 0.1 DATA PTS 257 STORM... SCS_IIM DURATION 24.0 RAINFALL 10.0 EXCESS.. 8.159.0233 ACREAGE. 1.6 TC, HRS. 0.25 TP, HRS. 12.2 PEAK CFS 7.3975863 ACFT VOL 1.0875033 READY... YES CFS TOL. 0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 20 X 20. TO THE INCH.. 7 X 10 INCHES G KEUFFEL & ESSER CO. MAOE IN U.S.A. 461240 r n t9 44. I3: -I t yl . I'm O ,La ?3, ,"° ITa 06" Ir ISM FIGURE 12 CLEARWATER COURTYARD PEER JOB # 03.1460 DETERMINE TIME TO PERCOLATE WATER QUALITY VOLUME DETENTION POND SIDE-DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS (Using Darcy's Law for flow through porous materials) ASSUMED UNDER-DRAIN LENGTH= 49.00 Ft. "K" VALUE = 3.5 Ft/Hr. UNDERDRAIN PIPE DIAMETER = 0.33 Ft. WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 2,904.00 CF. WATER QUALITY EL = 41.93 Ft. WATER STORAGE STARTING EL = 41.52 Ft. UNDERDRAIN UPPER INV = 40.85 Ft. UNDERDRAIN LOWER INV = 40.85 Ft. WIDTH OF FILTER SAND = 2.00 Ft. h delta h V E TOTAL INCR. TOTAL ELEV HEAD HEAD VOLUME (NGVD) (Ft.) (Ft.) (CF.) 41.930 0.915 2,904.000 0.410 41.520 0.505 0.000 FACTOR OF SAFETY = 72 HRS/TOTAL TIME = 2.00 AVERAGE UNDERDRAIN INV = 40.85 + hl = 41.93 h2 = 41.52 AVG. FLOW WIDTH AREA delta V LENGTH OF OF AVG. delta T SUM T INCR. THRU HYD. FILTER FILTER FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL VOLUME FILTER GRADE SAND SAND Q=KiA 01+Q2/2 TIME TIME (CF.) (Ft.) i=h/I (Ft.) (SF.) (CF/h) (CF/h) (hrs) (hrs) 2.000 0.4575 2.000 98.000 156.923 0.000 2.904.000 121.765 23.849 2.000 0.2525 2.000 98.000 86.608 23.849 40.85 /2 = 40.850 40.85 0.165 = 0.915 40.85 0.165 = -0.505 TOTAL TIME REQUIRED TO FILTER WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 23.84922 FIGURE 13 • r r Line Items: Receipt #: 1200500000000004572 Date: 05/20/2005 5/20/2005 3:53:29PM Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid 0, FLD2005-05037 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check DRUID COURTYARD CLWR LLC R_D 1508 In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page I of 1 1,205.00 $1,205.00 cReceipt.rpt • • FLD2005-05037 1105 DRUID RD Date Received: 05/20/2005 THE COURTYARD ZONING DISTRICT: HDR LAND USE: RH IVN19ldO ATLAS PAGE: 296A CLW CoverSheet PLANNER OF RECORD: D E Cc, ti l l - 8 2005 ?ELOPMENT -ImCES Y OF CLEARWATER 0 - 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 1 q 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2005-05037 1105 DRUID RD Date Received: 05/20/2005 CLEARWATER COURT YARDS ZONING DISTRICT: HDR LAND USE: RH ATLAS PAGE: 296A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLW CoverSheet I Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1)collated, 2)stapled and 3)folded sets of site plans o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) D RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff initials) ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) N PLEASE TYPE OR PRINTN A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1112 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727/446-9204 FAX NUMBER: 727/446-9205 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Clearwater Land Ltd. (Must include ALL owners As listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Nicholas F. Ferraioli MAILING ADDRESS: 1112 South Missouri Avenue, Suite 106, Clearwater, Florida 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727/447-4481 AAV 9 " 4- FAX NUMBER: 727/446-9205 CELL NUMBER: 610/316-1197 E-MAIL ADDRESS: Ferraiolil @,aol.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS: 1105 Druid Road Clearwater Florida 33756 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Attached I (If not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)- PARCEL NUMBER: 15/29/15/00000/340/300 .JU - 8 2005 i PARCEL SIZE: 1.61 acres --- - n?.?1 (acres, square feet) I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 47 Units residential 1-Y OF CLEARWATER (Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage o nresidMf'tial use DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Flexible Development approval see below description: Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft. to 10 ft. (to entry feature columns and 18.5 Ft to pavement) a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft. to 4 ft. (to entry feature columns and 15 Ft. to the pool deck and pavement) and an increase to building height from 30 ft. to 55 ft. (to roof deck) with an additional 2.5 feet for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Section 2.504A. - Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ' 0 I LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF C L,EARWAT'ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE(727)562-4567 FAx(727) 562-4865 August 22, 2005 Mr. Nicholas F. Ferraioli 1112 South Missouri Avenue, Suite 106 Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-05037 - 1 105 Druid Road Dear Mr. Ferraioli: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 18.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.9 feet (to entry feature column) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 55 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-5041. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-504.F. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1.. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to show a four-foot high opaque fence or wall along the north and south property lines to screen off-street parking from the adjacent parcels, reduced to a maximum height of three feet within the front setback area; 3. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum six feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground; 5. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; FRANK HIBB.ARD, MAYOR BILL. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DomN, COUNciumrmBi.R HOYr HAMILTON, COLINCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "FQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOtiTR 0 0 August 22, 2005 Ferraioli - Page 2 6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 16, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 30, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.Inyclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, _ Michae Delk, AI P Planning Director Cc: Paul Sherma S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications Druid 1105 The Courtyard (HDR) - ApprovedIDruid 1105 Development Order.doc 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:55 PM To: Paul (Colleen) Sherma (E-mail) Subject: Staff Report for 8.16.05 CDB Paul - Attached is the Staff Report for 1105 Druid Road for the 8.16.05 CDB meeting at 1:00pm at Clearwater City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue. Wayne Druid 1105 Staff Report.doc Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 11, 20054:59 PM To: 'Ferraioli1 @aol.com' Subject: Staff Report for 1105 Druid Road for 8.16.05 CDB Mr. Ferraioli - Attached is the Staff Report for the 8.16.05 CDB meeting at 1:00 pm at Clearwater City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue. Wayne T Druid 1105 Staff Report.doc FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 m Ili _ TO: FAX: '-5-70- 3S-3 7 Phone: S-7 b` Z o o 7 FROM: W Q I ?f Phone: S l? z- -4s-4 7 A 0 RE:_'0?Lo aS - 0 5 03 DATE:_ lU T Dfv?? ?k. MESSAGE: Qr NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 7-? Aug. 09 2005 04:57PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95763537 Aug.09 04:56PM 01'03 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:34 AM To: Paul (Colleen) Sherma (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-05037, 1105 Druid Road Paul - The packets that have been submitted to-date for the above case that are going to the CDB are lacking certain items: 1. Attachment A - This is the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings and your responses. This was previously submitted, but not this time. Incorporate your response to comment #19 in your Letter of Response to DRC comments. 2. Need the reduced (8.5" x 11") site and landscape plans. 3. Need the reduced (8.5" x 11") building elevations and floor plans. 4. Need the reduced (8.5" x 11") colored building elevations. Alternately, if you wanted to submit the 24" x 36" colored elevations and one reduced copy of the same (your choice). I- need 15 copies of the above by noon, July 20, 2005. These will need to be collated into the packets. Call me to discuss (562-4504). Thanks. Wayne ? PEER 0 Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. Engineering, Planning, Permitting July 7, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Clearwater Florida 33756 RE: The Courtyard - Druid Road Case No.: FLD2005-05037 PEER Job No.: 03-1460 Dear Mr. Wells: ORIGINAL Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. is in receipt of City of Clearwater e-mail dated June 27`h, 2005 with comments for the above referenced project. Please find enclosed fifteen (15) sets of the revised Civil Engineering Plans collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. In addition, please find below responses to the comments: GENERAL ENGINEERING: 1. Comment: Separate right-of-way permits will be required for al work within the right- of-way of any of the adjacent streets that are assigned to the city. Response: A right-of-way permit application will be submitted to the City of Clearwater for review and approval. 2. Comment: The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (Backflow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. Response: Note No. 14 on. Sheet No. 5 has been added. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 1. Comment: This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Review and approval by the Authority having jurisdiction shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Response: Acknowledged. JUL - 8 2005 j 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-„ OF CLEARWATER , 646 94th Avenue North • St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2463 (727) 576-2007 • Fax (727) 576-3537 • E-Mail: peer@tampabay.rr.com PEER 2. Comment: Fire hydrants must be provided within 300 ft. of the most remote point of the building (as the hose is laid) for fire fighting purposes. Provide additional hydrants. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: A fire hydrant has been provided at the corner of MLK and Druid Road. Please see Sheet No. 5. 3. Comment: The building must be protected by a fire sprinkler system as per NFPA-13. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: The building will have a fire sprinkler system as per NFPA-13. 4. Comment: Show on the plan the freestanding FDC (fire department connection) at least 15 ft. from the building. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: A FDC has been added along the south side of the building. Please see Sheet No. 5. 5. Comment: The freestanding FDC (fire department connection) must be within 40 ft of the fire hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: A fire hydrant has been added along the south side of the building within 40' of the FDC. 6. Comment: Clearances of 7 %Z feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant must be maintained per NFPA- 1. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: Note No. 15 on Sheet No. 5 has been added. 7. Comment: Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florid Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 %2 feet in front-,dPand toi the sides (including the rear side) of the appliance, as per 1 1, sFldr da fire Prevention Code. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: Note No. 16 on Sheet No.5 has been added. 8. Comment: Show on the plan 30 degree turning radii for ingress and egress for emergency vehicle access. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: Sheet No. 5 has been revised to show 30' radius. 0 0 PEER 9. Comment: Is there a perimeter fence around the dry detention pond? Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: There is no fence around the dry detention pond. 10. Comment: Provide gate type knox boxes for emergency vehicle access as per Pinellas County Ordinance 98-04. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: There are no entry gates at the driveway locations. The gates at the center Courtyard will be tied into the building fire sprinkler system. The gates will be designed to default to the open position during a fire. 11. Comment: Drain covers and grates in drive aisle must meet HS-20 specifications. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: Note No. 23 on Sheet No. 3 has been added. 12. Comment: Where underground water main and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA- 241. Please respond to this comment prior to CDB. Response: Acknowledged. LAND RESOURCES: 1. Comment: Show ALL trees, with their canopies, to be preserved on ALL civil plans prior to CDB. Response: The existing trees with their canopies have been shown on the Civil Engineering Plans. 2. Comment: Reroute the storm line eastward away from tree #10 prior to CDB. Response: The storm line has been relocated. Please see Sheet No. 3. 3. Comment: Provide a lintel system at tree #29 and 37. Extend lintel from dripline to` dropline if possible. Provide a detail prior to CDB. Response: A lintel at tree #29 and 37 will be provided. Please see Sheet No. 2. Please see Architectural Plan for the lintel detail. 4. Comment: Show tree #7, 10 and 45 to be saved prior to CDB. Response: Trees #7, 10 and 45 are shown to be saved. 0 0 PEER 5 Comment: Show all trees rated #2 and below on the inventory to be removed prior to building permit. Response: No existing trees were rated 2 or below as per Rick. LANDSCAPING: 1. Comment: Revise Sheet 2 to indicate a 15 foot wide perimeter landscape buffer required along MLK Avenue and Druid Road (only a 10-foot buffer indicated along each roadway). Response: Sheet No. 2 has been revised to show a 15' buffer. PARKS AND RECREATION: 1. Comment: Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727/562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Response: Acknowledged. STORMWATER: 1. Comment: Site does not have a positive outfall and therefore attenuation of the 50yr storm is required per page 1 of the City of Clearwater drainage criteria. Response: Please find enclosed as Attachment "A"(revised calculations for the 50Yr- 24Hr storm event). 2. Comment: This outfall configuration will be allowed, however, a trench drain across the site driveway should be utilized to disperse the flow to the street. Response: As shown on the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan, the elevation of the driveway location is 42.69 Ft. NGVD vs the elevation at the proposed Type "D" grate of 40.27 Ft. NGVD. Placing a trench,. grate of the driveway location will require the site to be filled an additional 2.42'Ft. As shown in the revised Drainage Calculations, Attachment "A", the pre- condition 50Yr - 24Hr peak discharge is 0.91 CFS. The post-condition 50Yr - 24Hr peak discharge is 0.66 CFS. There is less than 1 CFS flow from the Type "D" inlet. Plus, there is a reduction of 0.25 CFS (27.47%) from the pre-condition to the post-condition 50Yr - 24Hr peak discharge. It is requested the Type "D" inlet remain as designed. • PbFR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: • 1. Comment: Remove ground monument sign out of sight triangle. Must be addressed prior to CDB. Response: The ground monument sign on MLK has been removed. Please see Sheet No.2. 2. Comment: Columns for car port must not encroach inside the 9' wide x 19' long dimension of a parking stall. Must be addressed prior to CDB. Response: The carports have been removed. 3. Comment: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a CO. Response: Acknowledged. PLANNING: 1. Comment: Revise the description of request(s) to that as indicated by Staff. Response: A revised application is enclosed. 2. Comment: Interior landscaping indicated on Sheet 2 cannot count those areas within the first 15 feet of Druid Road and MLK Avenue (15-foot perimeter buffer required along both these roads). Revise. Response: The interior landscape calculations do not include the 15' buffer along Druid Road and MLK. 3. Comment: Revise Sheets A-3, A-4 and A-5 to indicate the height of the perimeter parapet from the top of the roof deck to the top of all points of the parapet. Response: Sheets A-3, A-4 and A-5 have been revised. F 4. Comment: Proposed monument sign on MLK Avenue cannot be within the sight; visibility triangle and it must meet a five-foot setback from all property lines. Response: The ground monument sign on MLK Boulevard has been. Please see Sheet No. 2. 5. Comment: Provide on Sheet 2 the proposed setback to pavement from the front property line on the north side of the driveway (appears greater than 15 feet). PEfR Response: The setback distance has been added to Sheet No. 2. 6. Comment: Provide the anticipated value of the property after the project has been constructed. Response: The anticipated value of the property is $8,700,000.00 7. Comment: Ensure the carport structures do not encroach into the drive aisle. Response: The carport structures have been removed. 8. Comment: For 71 required parking spaces, only three handicap parking spaces are required. Response: The site plan has been revised to show three (3) handicap parking spaces. 9. Comment: Code requires for attached dwellings parking be screened from adjacent properties by a four-foot high landscaped fence or wall. Sheet 2 indicates a 48" high fence, but cross-sections A-A and B-B on Sheet 13 only indicates 42" high fence. Revise Sheet 13. Also, indicate the type of fence or wall proposed. Response: Sheet No. 13 has been revised. The type of fence is aluminum. 10. Comment: Sheet 2 - Unclear as to what height and material the proposed pool fence is. Provide any details. Response: Sheet No. 2 has been revised to show 42" high aluminum fence around the pool deck. 11 . Comment: Indicate on Sheets A-3 through A-6 the roof deck level (assumed at this point to be 55 feet above what?). Response: Sheet Nos. A-3 through A-6 have been revised. 12. Comment: Provide 24"x36" versions of the floor plans (Main Level and,Second though Fifth Floor Levels) (previously provided). Response: 24" x 36" versions of the floor plan are enclosed. 13. Comment: General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development will be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." Provide the number of floors or height of the multi-story building on the north side of Druid Road. Address density, etc. of the adjacent properties. 0 0 PeER Response: Please see Attachment "B & C". 14. Comment: General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof." Discuss effects of this proposal on the value of adjacent properties. Response: Please see Attachment "B & C". 15. Comment: General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood." Address driveway locations, sidewalks, bus stops, etc. in relation to the surrounding development and to MLK Avenue and Druid Road. Response: Please see Attachment "B & C". 16. Comment: General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "is designed to minimize traffic congestion." Address number of units and parking spaces, the location of driveways in relation to turn lanes, etc. on MLK Avenue and Druid Road. Response: Please see Attachment "B & C". 17. Comment: General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Address the height and character of the adjacent properties, etc. Response: Please see Attachment "B & C". 18. Comment: General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how the design of this proposed development "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." Address any visual impacts,'includ-ing,the proposed height in relation to the adjacent properties, how the project will have the same hours of operation as the adjacent residential properties, etc. Response: Please see Attachment "B & C". 19. Comment: Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" #A.6 - Address with specific information as to how the reduction to the front setback (to pavement) for this proposed development is in compliance with "existing structures along the same side of the road" that "have been constructed r • PFER with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood." Also, address "the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way." Finally, the proposed reduction (to pavement) "will not adversely affect adjacent property values." Response: Based on field measures, the existing pavement of the Hidden Oaks Apartment community located east of the Courtyard community is located 21.5 Ft. from Druid Road right-of-way line. The existing sign for the Sunshine Towers community located south of the Courtyard community is located 12 Ft. from MLK Boulevard right-of-way line. The proposed reduction in setback of 15Ft. and 18.5 Ft. to the Courtyard pavement is in compliance with existing pavement structure along Druid Road and the proposed reduction is not out of character with the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed entry feature columns reduction in front setback of 10 Ft. & 5 Ft. is not out of character. Since the Courtyard project is located at the southeast corner of Druid Road and MLK Boulevard, the entry feature columns on each side of the driveways will create a point of arrival when approaching the MLK Boulevard and Druid Road intersection from the east and south. The proposed reduction (to pavement) and to the entry feature columns will not adversely affect adjacent property values. If the entry feature columns are a subject of objection to the City of Clearwater or adjacent property owners, they can be eliminated. 20. Comment: The proposed entry feature columns - These will be counted as structures having to meet required setbacks. If so desired where located (I believe two on each side of each driveway on MLK Avenue and Druid Road), provide the proposed setbacks from the front and side property lines to these structures. Provide the overall height to the top of the light fixture. Unclear as to "number" name plate on the column feature (possible signage?) or whether it is the address of the property. Provide additional information of these features. Address the proposed setbacks in all appropriate criteria responses. -?????t??J ? ? ice' Response: The entry feature columns have been adjusted in size to match the Architectural Plans and have been relocated. The Architectural detail of the entry feature has been revised too show the height. The number on the column is the Courtyard address. • PECmm • If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your professionalism and diligence in assisting me with this project. Si ly, ORIGINAL aul V. erma, P.E. cc: Mr. Nicholas Ferraioli w/o enclosure enc PVS/csc P:\WPDOCS\2003 JOBS\03-1460\PERMITS\COCresponseO6-28-05.wpd JUL - 8 2005 43 ;; L PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT i SERVICES { ?P CLEARWATER I RJ LEON 4 ASSOCIATES, INC. 4339 Honey Vista Circle Tampa, FL 33624 Phone 4 Fax * (813) 968-51143 raycyn2imaol,com July 6, 2005 City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 To: Development Review RE: The Courtyard... 1105 Druid Rd ... Clearwater, FL 33756 I ADECE?- JUL 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C17' OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL PLAN REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 3. Revise sheets A-3, A4 and A-5 to indicate the height of the perimeter parpaet....... See Sheets A-3, A4, A-5 & A-6 for Revisions and Sheet A-7 for Cut Section 7. Ensure the Carport structures do not encroach into the drive aisle. This Application does not apply 11. Indicate on Sheets A-3 thru A-6 the roof deck level....... See Sheets A-3 thru A-6 for Elevation Heights added 12. Provide 24"06" versions of the floor plans... See New sheets added with Owner's name and address. 20. The proposed entry feature columns - These will be counted as structures..... See Sheet A-7 for new Entry Detail FIRE REVIEW ..... 3. The building must be protected by a fire sprinkler as per NFPA-13.... See Sheet A-1 for revisions showing Gates to building and Notes for Sprinkler System LAND RESOURCES REVIEW ..... 3. Provide a lintel system at tree #29 and 37. Extend lintel from dripline todripline.... See Site Plan for Root lintel Detail TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: 2. Columns for car port must not encroach inside...... This application does not apply to this project. • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:10 PM To: 'Ron Belko' Subject: RE: Clearwater Courtyards Question (Butler's Nursery) Ron - I think you are OK. The buffer will be the entire 15 feet, but look at Section 3-1202.D.2 for the stormwater/landscape buffer rules for slope and landscape materials. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Ron Belko [mailto:ronsplans@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:07 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Courtyards Question (Butler's Nursery) Mr. Wells, I just received the latest revisions for the Clearwater Courtyards Project. I have a Question regarding the 15' landscape buffer. One of the comments that was given for this project is that the buffer needed to be increased from the 10' origional to the appropriate 15'. Upon looking at the site plan the dry retention pond slope is in the 15' buffer. This gives me 7 1/2' landscape area and 7 1/2' sod for the slope of the retention pond. Is this ok? I know this problem shows up from time to time and I am unsure if the buffer includes the slope for a retention pond. Thanks for your input, Ron Belko Butler's Nursery, Inc. 7/5/2005 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 6:38 PM To: 'ferraioli1 @aol.com' Cc: Paul (Colleen) Sherma (E-mail) Subject: Draft 6.30.05 DRC comments for FLD2005-05037, 1105 Druid Road Meeting time on June 30, 2005, is 3:15 pm. spi? L?id draft 6.30.05 dre action agend... LL CITY OF CLEORWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 09, 2005 Nicholas Ferraioli 1112 S Missouri Avenue Suite 1 Clearwater, F133756 RE: FLD2005-05037 -- 1105 DRUID RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Nicholas Ferraioli : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05037. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 30, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-05037 - 1105 DRUID RD FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: r-i-mcc, o1', FAX: A-4 I. - I ?S Phone: 4 A ? - 4-4-01 FROM: Phone: S b Z• 4-304- DATE:. ja L RE: ?7- aS - O S 073 7 ??oS ?r??a ?-a• MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 2- Jun. 09 2005 12:31PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469205 Jun.09 12:30PM 00'59 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:14 AM To: 'Ferraioli1@aol.com; Paul (Colleen) Sherma (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-05037, 1105 Druid Rd. letter of mpleteness 6.9.05.. • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:18 AM To: Paul (Colleen) Sherma (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-05037, 1105 Druid Road letter of completeness 6.3.0. ? CITY OF CL?:?RV6?ATER ° ClearWater* PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MY CLEARW ATER. C OM q.rl - June 03, 2005 Nicholas Ferraioli 1112 S Missouri Avenue Suite 1 Clearwater, F133756 RE: FLD2005-05037 -- 1105 DRUID RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Nicholas Ferraioli : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05037. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. ?l. Based on the information available online from the State Division of Corporations, the mailing address for Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC (1112 S. Missouri Avenue) is different than that indicated on the application (710 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue). Which is correct? V2. Revise the parcel number on the application to 15/29/15/00000/340/0300. Q Revise the description of request(s) to that as indicated by Staff. J® Provide detailed responses to the General Applicability criteria listed in the application as to how the proposal complies with the criteria. Also, please do not repeat back the criteria as the response. This may require an Exhibit A to the application if the size of the responses are greater than the area available on the application form. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-0503 7 - 1105 DRUID RD ° 0 CITY OF CLIKRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Clearwater* MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 03, 2005 J5. Provide detailed responses to the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings as to how the proposal complies with the criteria. Also, please do not repeat back the criteria as the response. This may require an Exhibit A to the application if the size of the responses are greater than the area available on the application form. The criteria is as follows: A. Attached dwellings. 1. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. c. The height may exceed 80 feet if the parcel proposed for development fronts on Clearwater Bay or is only separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open space. 3. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas; 4. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 5. All waste disposal containers which serve the proposed use are located within a landscaped enclosed structure. 6. Front setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way. c. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values. V/( Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. 7. As part of the site data on Sheet 2, provide the total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet. ?8. As part of the site data on Sheet 2 and on the building elevations, provide the building height from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (assumed to be flat). Also include the height of the perimeter parapet (from the flat roof deck). %/G Provide a tree inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. J10. Show the sight visibility triangles on the landscape plan. Ensure landscaping complies with triangle requirements. J l 1. Show on the landscape plan the existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey). Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-05037 - 1105 DRUID RD ClearWater* LL CITY OF CLIRWATER ° PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 03, 2005 J 12. On the landscape plan, indicate the spacing of shrubs and groundcovers. Jl3. Landscape plan does not comply with the required trees within the landscape buffers (see Section 3-1202.D.1). 114. On the landscape plan, include a key (symbol or label) in the plant schedule. J15. As part of the site data on Sheet 2, include the interior landscape area coverage, expressed in both square feet and percentage of the vehicular use area (VUA) (minimum of 10 percent of VUA required). 16. On the building elevations, indicate the exterior finish material and the color (written). 17. Provide color samples or chips of the proposed exterior building colors (one copy). Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Monday, June 6, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-0503 7 - 1105 DRUID RD FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ; 61" . 0- FAX: . 4 ar b - ' z-o.S Phone: l { l - 44- G 1 FROM: Q\, Phone: ?0 2 '-4-Ta4 DATE:, _ts J34-'s RE: FLP cos' 6 J T 7 1103' Dr ?vd 2a . MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) S Jun. 03 2005 10:20AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469205 Jun.03 10:18AM 01'54 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HEt_P-FAX C435-7329]. LL All' Old FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ?a. "l Sly- .a. FAX: '-I V' 3537 Phone: 5-7 ?d o -7 FROM: A`.S Phone: S to t - S' b 4 DATE:_ ?' 3I OS RE: ?-? 2.ovS - p 0 37 1 ID MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) S Jun. 03 2005 09:21AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95763537 Jun.03 09:18AM 02'33 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-73291. RTY OF CLEARWAY z PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY FLD2005-05037 1105 DRUID RD J 2 THE COURTYARD v Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Section 2-504.A. PEOPLE ,?ole: he CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS PHONE: 727-725-3345 COALITION FAX: No Fax 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 Other DRUID COURTYARD CLEARWATER, PHONE: 727-446-9204 LLC FAX: 727-446-9205 710 S FORT HARRISON ST CLEARWATER, FL 33756 Owner/Property ROBERT W WILSON THE PHONE: No Phone PO BOX 185 FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33757 Other NICHOLAS FERRAIOLI PHONE: 727-447-4401 1112 S MISSOURI AVENUE SUITE 1 FAX: 727-446-9205 .,, CLEARWATER, FL 33756 Other SOUTH CLEARWATER CITIZENS FOR PHONE: No Phone PROGR FAX: No Fax DUKE TIEMAN 1120 KINGSLEY ST. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 FEES Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due Flexible Commercial $1,205.00 $1,205.00 $0.00 Total $1,205.00 $1,205.00 $0.00 CONDITIONS All conditions must be met before a permit can be issued. rAForms\InfoSummary.rpt ?j. 0 PEER 0 Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. Engineering, Planning, Permitting May 16, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Senior Planner ORIGINAL 100 South Myrtle Avenue AN j s 2005 Clearwater, Florida 33756- -ally QF C..:._ ..., ... S 1C? RE: Clearwater Courtyards PEER Job No.: 03-1460 Dear Mr. Wells: Please find enclosed the following items for your review and approval for the above referenced project: A. Fifteen (15) sets of the Engineering Construction Drawings signed and sealed. B. Fifteen (15) completed original Flexible Standard Development Application and attachments. C. Three (3) copies of the Drainage Calculations Booklet. D. A check in the amount of $1,205.00 made payable to the City of Clearwater. Would you please review and approve the above application form and plans. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your professionalism and diligence in assisting me with this project. Sincere Paul V. Shenna, P.E. Enc cc: Mr. Nick Ferraioli w/o enclosure PVS/csc P :\WPDOCS\2003 JOBS\03-1460\PERMITS\COCPERMITSLTR.wpd 646 94th Avenue North • St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2463 (727) 576-2007 • Fax (727) 576-3537 • E-Mail: peer@tampabay.rr.com z 6 Y- CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Representative: Address: August 16, 2005 FLD2005-05037 F4 Clearwater Land Ltd. Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC Mr. Nicholas Ferraioli 1105 Druid Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: ORIGINAL REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 18.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.9 feet (to entry feature column) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 55 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-504.F. EXISTING ZONING/ High Density Residential (HDR) District; Residential High (RH) LAND USE: Category PROPERTY SIZE: 1.613 acres; 70,304.7 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (47 units - condominium) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings LAND USES: .East: High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings South: High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings West: Office District; Funeral Home and Detached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area to the north, east and south is developed with attached dwellings. Detached dwellings and a funeral home are across South Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue to the west. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 1 of 8 0 0 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.613 acres is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and Druid Road. The site has 265.16 feet of frontage on both Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and is currently vacant. The property to the north across Druid Road is developed with a 12-story residential building. The property to the south and east is developed with an attached dwelling complex of two-story buildings. The property further to the southeast has been redeveloped as the Renaissance Square attached dwelling complex (formerly the Sunshine Mall) with buildings up to four and five stories in height. Proposal: The proposal is to develop the site with 47 attached dwellings in a five-story building. The building is designed around an internal atrium with the north and south portions of the building mirror images of themselves. The units in the building are a stepped design, with the center units farthest apart and the end units closer to each other: Units range between 1300 to 1425 square feet of living area each. There are 10 dwelling units per floor, except the ground floor, which will have seven dwelling units. The ground floor has a mechanical room, as well as the office. The ground floor also contains a deck (northwest corner of the building) overlooking the retention pond and a pool (southwest corner of the building). The request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the height increase and setback reductions being requested to the pavement and the entry feature columns. The proposal includes reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 18.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to entry feature column) and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.9 feet (to entry feature column). The proposed building exceeds the required front setback of 25 feet, being located 32.2 feet from the Druid Road front property line and 45.36 feet from the Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue front property line. The proposed parking lot meets the side setback requirement of 10 feet along the east and south property lines. The proposal includes a front setback reduction along Druid Road to 18.5 feet to the pavement of the parking area along the east side of the property, and a front setback reduction along Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue to 15 feet to the pavement of the parking area along the south side of the property. These setbacks to pavement are common for new developments (whether residential or nonresidential). The other setback reductions are for entry feature columns, one on each side of the driveways on Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue. These entry columns are proposed 10 feet from the Druid Road right-of-way (two. feet from the east property line) and four feet from the Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue right-of-way (1.9 feet from the south property line). These entry feature columns are designed approximately five feet square and 10 feet tall, each with a light on top of the column. These columns are solely decorative features, will contain the site address and are located outside of the sight visibility triangles. They are not intended for site signage. The pool deck is proposed to be located within the front setback from Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue; however, the pool itself will meet the required front setback. The pool will be fenced in accordance with Code requirements. While the Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 2 of 8 0 proposed pavement and pool deck do not fully meet the Code front setback requirements, the proposal complies with landscape buffering requirements along these roadways, providing adequate areas for site landscaping. The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks are justified by the benefits of the building exceeding required setbacks allowing for significant landscaped areas along the roadways, enhancing the surrounding area. The development of this parcel may be viewed as otherwise impractical without the requested deviations from the required setbacks, wherein all setback reductions are to non-building structures. Additionally, the stepped design of this project creates an interesting building form and function which will enhance the character of the surrounding area, and which breaks up the scale and massing of the building. The proposal meets the required 15-foot wide landscape buffer along both Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue (to pavement). Additionally, the site meets the required 10-foot landscape buffer along the east and south property lines (to pavement). With the retention area located along the north and west sides of the building, the proposal complies with the required amount of level areas for landscaping within the buffers. The four-foot high fence, depicted on the site plan along the east and south property lines to screen off-street parking from the adjacent parcels, will need to be solid/opaque. The site design provides one driveway on the east side along Druid Road and one driveway on the south side along Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue. The applicant is providing the minimum required parking of 71 spaces for the 47 attached dwellings (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit). Parking will be open and uncovered. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 30 feet to 55 feet (to roof deck), with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets, providing for five floors of residential units. The parapets are of varying heights above the roof deck to provide visual interest to the roofline of the building. As a Flexible Development use, the Code provides a building height range from 30 to 130 feet for attached dwellings. The property to the north across Druid Road is developed with a 12-story residential building. The property to the south and east is developed with an attached dwelling complex of two-story buildings. The property farther to the southeast has- been redeveloped as the Renaissance Square attached dwelling complex (formerly the Sunshine Mall) with buildings up to four and five stories in height. While the proposed height is greater than that of the existing adjacent residential buildings to the east and south, the proposed height is less than the maximum height allowable and can be viewed as transitioning the height between the building to the north and the buildings to the south and east. The proposed building height will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, density and character of adjacent properties. Flexibility in regard to building height is justified by the benefits of a well-designed building that is stepped in design around the center atrium that is compatible with the surrounding character. The increase for the parapets may be viewed as making them proportional in respect to the height of the building and to aid in the screening of the rooftop air conditioning units. The existing sidewalks along Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue will be retained. Retaining the sidewalk in its present location and width along Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue will aid in the preservation of the existing trees within the right-of-way. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 3 of 8 0 9 The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign must be a monument-style sign a maximum six feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the buildings. Staff's support for this proposal is based on the reasons enumerated above. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding properties. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Residential Infill Project criteria (Section 2-504.17) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 4 of 8 • 0 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Sections 2-501.1 and 2-504) STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 47 dwelling units X DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (48 dwelling units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.63 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.85 maximum LOT AREA (For 1.613 acres; 70,304.7 square feet X attached dwellings: 15,000 sq. feet minimum LOT WIDTH (For North: 265.16 feet X attached dwellings: West: 265.16 feet 150 feet minimum FRONT SETBACK North: 10 feet (to entry feature X* (15-25 feet) columns); 18.5 feet (to pavement) West: Four feet (to entry feature columns); 15 feet (to pavement and ool deck REAR SETBACK N/A (a) X (10-15 feet SIDE SETBACK South: 10 feet (to pavement); 1.9 feet X* (0-10 feet) (to entry feature column) East: 10 feet (to pavement); two feet (to entry feature column) HEIGHT (For 55 feet (to roof deck) with an X* attached dwellings: additional six feet for perimeter 30-130 feet maximum parapets (from roof deck PARKING SPACES 71 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings; 71 spaces required) (a) Corner lots have two front setbacks and two side setbacks. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 5 of 8 0 COMPLIANCE WITH RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-504.F): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in X the district. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with X adjacent lands uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and X function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Building height may. only exceed 80 feet, however, if the parcel proposed for development fronts on Clearwater Bay or is only separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open sace. * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 6 of 8 0 0 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.613 acres is zoned High Density Residential District and has 265.16 feet of lot width on both Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. Based on current Land Use Category density limitations of 30 dwelling units per acre, the subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 48 dwelling units, which is one more than the proposal of 47 dwelling units; 4. The property to the north across Druid Road is developed with an attached dwelling building 12 stories in height; 5. The property to the south and east is developed with an attached dwelling complex with buildings two stories in height; 6. The building proposed is designed to be 55 feet in height, with parapets a maximum of six feet above the roof deck, providing for five floors of residential units. The property farther to the southeast has been redeveloped as the Renaissance Square attached dwelling complex (formerly the Sunshine Mall) with buildings up to four and five stories in height; 7. The proposed height is less than the maximum height allowable and can be viewed as transitioning the height between the building to the north and the buildings to the south and east; 8. All buildings meet required setbacks. Setback reductions requested are to non-buildings (pavement, entry feature columns and pool deck); 9. Required landscape buffers are provided around the perimeter of the property; 10. Parking provided meets the minimum requirements of the Code; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-5041; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 30, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 18.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to entry feature columns) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 1.9 feet (to entry feature column) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 55 feet (to roof deck) with an Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 7 of 8 0 0 additional six feet for perimeter parapets, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-504.F for the site at 1105 Druid Road, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-504.F. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to show a four-foot high opaque fence or wall along the north and south property lines to screen off-street parking from the adjacent parcels, reduced to a maximum height of three feet within the front setback area; 3. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum six feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground; 5. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: IVA0^L el. [?4_ - Wayne Y. Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S. (Planning DeparnnenllC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIDruid 1105 The Courtyard (HDR) 8.16 CDB - WmDruid 1105 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05037 - Page 8 of 8 0 0 1777 1 vu 777 771 3 - CHEW SL SR. 590 g ? C ? O S ?? ??° a °<? GROVE ST UE U ? I ? D ROVE g LAURA ; LAURA N z ??????og? I?R? F 6 SR. 60 CLEVELAND ST C§E] = oi= S PARK ELT PARK 3T PARK E PIEL2CE S7 ? PIERCE ST ®< P101CE 4 ?? FYu SIS ? El ? FRANKLIN Z < ? R'tANRIN ? ?T F1 < fPAN? < ? COURT . Q ® ? ?A _ F GOULD ST p DEIEON <? SANTA R054 C? ? ? ? f? SAN I" RRONNELL yT 1J D ST U COURT ST COURT ST ROGERS ST <? ? ?2 ? ?? ? R R° ?? ??7 v < a ?y TURNER Sr S a? ? a ? ?? a m ?a _ KVWU) PINE ? µpJ r? p PINE PINE a S7 PRE Sra ? E Su ZI U ??.J PINE E D] RD 1W DRUID RD a = jj OPIUM L?? ` Y E] WAY OftK GR S a XSIVIINE p Lu IV^MINE a OR MAGNOW? ? LOTUS PATH PROJECT LOTUS PATH 2 SITE 2 ? EFFOROS ?_ .FFn o . r-, a awm BARRY ST we R IY ? ? ?<?G? < 5? E= ?7 > PR$yAS ,plA? wr TUSWOLA rl??Sf?J Y= 3 , = ? ? T utl..lb MILTON < p S WATKM3 tE IUSKAVVILIA ST ?$ C1 ?7 DOfffiETT S7 A ST o a /? GA Ili LAKEVI ? ^ @ Q < Su ?u NORMANDY P (/4^fTL\'L'-\J ? IEYV ? i ? SOUTN ST a < g ewr SATS.LWA (R E ? 3 ORNJGE :Z) U V ? KINOS S UIM*E Mia , In OUEEN Sf OUffN BELLEV?VV iB.PIE ? AURA CITRUS Location Map Owner. Clearwater Land Ltd. I Case: FLD2005-05037 Site: 1105 Druid Road Property Size(Acres): 1.613 PIN: 15/29/15/00000/340/0300 Atlas Page: 296A 0 0 PINE ST I - 4-_ L -j 1 1 I--I J-I_i J I t I I 708 I o -lam J f_? 1 I j ? I I__J d 710 I-__1 o I _ l Nr+,a v? I I v , I O I - I ?O o `I I I ? 12 f_J 4 t w _ Q m I ? C6 W , I I__J It ?O _ I L_? z °I I 804 I i 1 818 1 r-, I r 81 I °o ??gIl t N 1$ i V j 14-1 ?o 8 ICI ?$1 ? ?? V LA???l WAY h A IJ ? r? I--- --- I J '-- dP4 ? -1 r_L qb6 00 Nj p R ? - S 1 O ? A rl?g I , 1006 1100 I IV ? I, l I I ? I I I I II ? I I ? I I I I -, I I I, I I` i t I I I I L-J , I -l I I I I 1 ? 1 1 1 1 I l t I __ 901 C\j ,. L------------ J N YORK CIR J G` i ?> r-7 ! -___--- _ --- \ ? I I t L --3 i ' s 3 _ - / ?/Vi 111011f % 1--1 1 Zoning Map Owner. I Clearwater Land Ltd. I Case: FLD2005-05037 Site: I 1105 Druid Road I Property 1.613 Size (Acres) PIN: Atlas Page: 296A 15/29/15/00000/340/0300 1 HDR DRUID RD 0 0 Al ILI k: N - - O 111 ?....._ vil , s IT 1 1 7 1 1 ` , - f '1 tl t - ,?R ?A I A , IA S Aerial Map Owner. Clearwater Land Ltd. Case: FLD2005-05037 Site: 1 105 Druid Road Property Size(Acres): 1.613 PIN: 15/29/15/00000/340/0300 Atlas Page: 296A • • - ?- sr 1 I PINE ST `' r---- '. Assisted ?rYV?i?g „? ` I ' a i ? g o r' i ° I'-a I i C1L11ty. ` -? - _ o I "irt J-I_i l I ---------- 11 etache I AT ellin ,L PINE ST S Attached dwellings -J _ (-, I I j I 1__J 708 710 ..1 \•??r _ ° to he d l 'ng o d ffi 'l _; I , , 4 Attached dwellings r------ DRUID RD Q Z 1 ?-t I ? Q a _ 1 ' I ' r-t I l I j I I ' I I j ? I ? W r Attached dwe#i4gs ?_? 1 1 I I I JASMINE WAY ? 901 l-10 - ° etiO CI , r'- I Fu>die I 1 l -' L_? L ?- L_ I 804 I -? 1 818 -A left d elf ns; ?+ I O I t l I N 1$ 1v I m g c ro--IN v> to to 0 ?, i ^ F ? . - I .. i v r c `- r y 1 -- 1 C j l-- dpa r- .1 s l-- ` l r-0'?-- lo K I----- ` L--- ------ N YORK CIR G? 0? i i ------------ ; Attached dmreAi m9s,% t 1 \`j ? i MAGNOLIA DR 1110 ??' Attphed cj;eN'nj l > ? 1-7 I 1 \ r100ji If I 1008 '----> r -1 I Z\ Gam( h 1 -- I I \ I ' II I r1 I I I I ,w2 111 t Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner Clearwater Land Ltd. I Case: FLD2005-05037 Site: I 1105 Druid Road ( Property 1.613 Size(Acres): PIN: 15/29/15/00000/340/0300 1 Atlas Page: I 296A U 4. AMON View looking southeast along Druid Road at subject property View looking southwest from Druid Road at subject property 1105 Druid Road • View looking south along Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue at subject property --, °, `S? View looking south at funeral home on southwest corner of Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue Page 1 of 2 FLD2005-05037 • View looking north at offices on the northwest corner of Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue View looking southeast from Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue at Hidden Oaks Apartments directly south of subject property 1105 Druid Road FLD2005-05037 0 '+ View looking northeast at Barbie Towers on the northeast corner of Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue View looking south from Druid Road at Hidden Oaks Apartments directly east of subject property Page 2 of 2 Aff, 0A Parks & Recs Condition 0 Conditions Associated Wit• FLD2005-05037 1105 DRUID RD Initials Missing Initials Missing 06/14/2005 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. _ening Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 06.127/2005 7/12/05- WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval that the fence be solid and cannot be higher than three feet within the front setback. 6/27/05 - WW Code requires for attached dwellings parking be screened from adjacent properties by a four-foot high landscaped fence or wall. Sheet 2 indicates a 48" high fence, but cross-sections A-A and B-B on Sheet 13 only indicates 42" high fence. Revise Sheet 13. Also, indicate the type of fence or wall proposed. 06/27/2005 Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" #A.6 - Address with specific information as Not Met to how the reduction to the front setback (to pavement) for this proposed development is in compliance with "existing structures along the same side of the road" that "have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood." Also, address "the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way." Finally, the proposed reduction (to pavement) "will not adversely affect adjacent property values." -Irint Date: 07/17/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 8 2 1 4 5 6 I 7 8 3 eoe 15 14 13 12 11 10 em 9 C ? %JI?. " CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 AND VICINITY `till PINELIAS COUNTY. FLORIDA PREPARED By s PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 100 S M tl A 7 C F y ve.. . e lewnoler. L 33 56 %II t„ Ph.: (727)562-4750. Fax: (727)526-4755 hltD: //Www.HlIXwalw-a.COm/CIl y_Depol ImbniS/pablif_wort9/enginbef/ Oieelamw: Public Informotion dot. Is furnished by toe City of Clearwater Public Worts Adminlstrollon/Engineering. and must be accepted and used by the `tlplenl with the und-tonding that the data eived w cHlected for the purpose of developing o 9ropni: InlrO 0-ture in entor y. As -n. the City of Clearwater PWA/E motes no warranties, expressed or Implied, concerning Ine ot-my. COmpletwees. el lability, or 9ullobility of this data far any other Dorliculor use. Fu'I""more. the City of Clearwater PWA/E assumes a Ilothily whotsoever ossocioted with toe use Or misuse of lush doto. N This Atlas pogo is subOcl to periodic a ooges. For information opoul latest revisions please call PWA/E a Nsit our Web site. N 0 100 200 400 600 SCALE: 1" = 400' LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS - - - - CITY LIMITS LINE r?,-1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY L.-"J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ZONE LINE Rasa QtO U3 e1. uym/ear M 5390 +0/07/93 ® 551) 01/i0/9e Q 5eee Os/15/98 ® ..so 03/e5/pb F REVISED: 8/26/2002 ZONING ATLAS SW 1/4 OF SECTION 15 - 29S - 15 E 2 9 6 A • • Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:24 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-05037 zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 8:16 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 1105 Druid Road Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-05037 for the property at 1105 Druid Road. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne << File: FLD Map request form.doc >> 1 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 8:16 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 1105 Druid Road Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-05037 for the property at 1105 Druid Road. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne IN! I L-J FLD Map request form.doc 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005-05037 Date Requested: July 18, 2005 Date Requested for (date): July 29, 2005 Maps Requested x? Location Map x? Aerial Map x? Zoning Map x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering x? Legal Description x? Survey x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Clearwater Land Ltd. Case: FLD2005-05037 Site: 1 105 Druid Road Property 1 Size(Acres): 1.613 I PIN: 15/29/15/00000/340/0300 I 1 Atlas Page: 296A 1 Tj wu ( j a x ; C4 ? 2866 ?1 ? $ I'll $ "°?A ° , _ meo 19 9 19 s ' CITY OF CLEARWATER Jill ° ,D zor" ? 87A 2 „? a g l0 11 13 n g e ?6 7 6 3 2 s0 2878 0n °' At R -_ g r>^- }ro - $ 5 4 so, S (sy AND VICINITY PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA -7 7- ° $ $ $ - ° g - r m.a • ae,tsm $ COURT 5T ?Ma •Ee eT m PREPARED a'r 6or ° ° ° ° CHE$7N y es a° - i PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION CDURT ° R t? Y 31/08 ENGINEERING Il.r m CONDO ° 31/11 }1/10 31/06 " A ?O3 V N 100 S. MNtle Ave.. Clearwolef. FL 33756 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 D2-62 31/09 3 5 3 s s "'?r CP Pn.: (727)562-4750. rod: (727)526-4755 3 4 5 ?+ 4 5 6 7 a 9 f0 11 12 73 16 15 9f4 g?Cy? - a God < oz /t ew es CRCENVD00 NBDICAL6oe 31/07 60 31/031"• 1 ?d tsr 53w °i h11D:IIwww.Clsmw°Id-fLCamRity_DGDONmen\s/DUWic ro,vs/engineer/ \c u A 1 C;.1.1-: 1 1 AND RBHABILWATION 31/04 ll? + 609 „ rs tA" 11 ?' 32 J0 s CENTER 6rs Pudic mformo0on tlato Is 1-10.d by the Coy or clearwaur B 7 6 16 15 14 13 12 P 9 < 37 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 gsos 62_82 Gtr 21J g ROOER$ Public WGre6 A°minletrollan /Englneerlny, aPtl -I be occeptea Q 10 608 Im T and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data 31/13 1fA received wag cdlecled for IhG Pu'P6eC ofy de-ping a grapo/E g° p I, y „r 3 dr9 RA A 4 g 6 8 W 1 2 3 q 5 6 a Infrastructure inventory. As such, the Clt of Cleornoler PWA T pp J 6a6 12A ro maees no warranties, expfessed or ImPPed. Conceming the °g ga $ $ o S o ^1 ` $$ ` C7 < U g is sat 1ze -Coll-Y. c Dleteness. rellubllitY, or sultabtlity or We data for 7 any Iher Dorl icul°r use. rurlhermore, the City of Cleorwol er TURNER Iso 136 rs PWA/E o o liability who Isoever ossocioted wit, the use cot T y 1 3 4 5 y 66 7 6 Z 6 a ? eo> A eo9 b 6rl 2 3 4 5 a 7 a 9 and 15 td 13 12 11 10 610 9 C $ $ e $T $ u misuse of such data. soa $ ° ^ ° $ 8 80 a $ E = p F H ; 1` 1 a 3 ^ c C E C 6 I $ This Atlas e is s a l bNO cl t dk 1 2 3 oY 31/15 u t` m ? p a o Der o e g l F f a me 4 a 6 7 6 9 10 It 12 13 14 15 16 od n n 31/19 2$ 9 ?° R T 1$' 20 E u 7 S i6 5 14 3 V 12 1 ea 9 veA > or ormot n on o0out latest revislanb please all PWA/E ar asil our wee sne. ? b? o e 32 30 29 28 25 24 23 2 21 20 19 16 g 17 1 6 s. s t z9 6 7 $ B $ 9 10 12 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 ?'I rr 1e 42/01 N > Y p' 27 26 - N IN^ 0 and 61 S0, 1 5 8 ni . h•c 6r6 42/02 Err - - $ - er 4 -sn e e e Y y 42/03 $ PINE ST 1 2 3 { g 6 '? • 1 2 3 4 51 6 $ 7 et is Tor I} 4 5 it x ,o IS 7 6 6 co I m m - S 10 42/04 10,0 200 400 600 11 zoo $ L$ $ >? - 8 'E E ° 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 Y 2d 19 18 7 16 1$A 13 8 14 12 SCALE: 1" = 400• 06 14 y A 2 15 0 1 7- 4 S 6° 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0 15 16 2 22 3 PINE >? en 42/05 t ' 3 or. n•1-ar nev= 1a,e- zro zo9 3231 30 >m 21 20 14 42/06 LEGEND: 29 26 27 26 25 24 3 22 21 20 I79 18 17 4 19 18 17 16 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 IN! ? n¢t no bo 1 ? I ;-; n I 'e " wN a 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 20 19 18 17 16 5 1 13 11>rd f0 42/07 O ?$ `? BLOCK NUMBER L0 ° w, 12 fJ 01 0 u1 wm Z 4 $ - kO 1234 LOT ADDRESS CV ® $ o so do I so $ e eo B0 ° " asa- _ a , ` AO ' ton-ss, W 3 4 5 1 2 3 a g ' r 1 z s . G 7 ?' ) ___ r?7 ??•'?? CITY LIMITS LINE e ? .1 1 Ij w . ? eol R = 8 1 6f 10 1 g 8 7 6 wn s er 34/03 'I } EE<?10 aoa r-.-1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY 01 I ° 'z' I' ' ?' m a o i 7 - OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS a P g > $2a , I? HIpOE-- ?"!OAKS r JASMME g g wr _ , ?) 1 I I I I F aoa ? A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX M $ MO 3 d 5 ?" I g 01 b O a 7 6 =r N O ' C4 MA 3571 B ? . a g $ 4 8 12 soa 1 °e fo v 1T O 60 16 1• fe ? t and 6 _ --- - Q ' S" ?1 < 9 W I $ ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY -_ vQRK yN?M1 !? I aor MDR ZONING DESIGNATION 34/Ot j? AF 01`ME•K1T5'??`, - ' are A ZONE LINE ? ?P?• 'S?c,. - ---n---r1 ate ?9 ? M ° $ ???0, ?' ? 9so I zr \ g 1 oar $ ° v w .1 _____- 66zphr alto 01 3 S 3 E root v ° wn wrs , rao ' f. road roe ` •' ` , row m s3aa ,aro, CT S' 6 8, d o IOOb s to" frl i(o4', :: .... 1. .., ._. :.i , STREET AP71- 'AT' 1 s 7 a ®ss1'1 p,/2o9• Q 69e• be/,598 a 7 a § o I ' roue z z ooe mt ) c , 14ISSAN,CE S01,10El ® 6-ft 02/o5/w aro 3 „ aro ° $ W mro „ I I E, ;) E, 4. 7 ti.:. L I uoz' ? 1 a j $ LOTUS m PAIN __ ___________II ,---------- - ~ ;llr4li?` _ _ S • y ? n ^ b ? uo ? B LT § $ e $a : rro $ : a r a 1'1 ----------- - •^•--•n -"rl 'i -- ____i ?'---__? E, te g ar 4 5 ° . ^ n n m w rro ... M/oefet Ase. Sii j . --'---- -------- r B 6 Q 1 10, u n , .°.r o vl ,. ^ n n r a w w 0° C -' --- ?- 34/012. I 7 7 lot ak I • > w 3o flat " eo r ? 8 ?+ so g 1 ............. LEXI CTON CLUB AT J rzro 43 Al R REVISED: C • -R a 2 RCPO ROC - - - ?tR T ' RENAISSA NCE SQUARE I. 8 26 2002 ? e -cab ? - _ - 1 _. _ > } rrrd ns e?$ .."° ?k' >a s a s s ° $i ° = °> e , do " ;lire -?- ZONING AS 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 It 5 4 3 2 1 $ 1 8 22/01 'ti n r_ • •__, zn _________ ___ ----- _------- __ r r . w 3058 3 ) -na 0671 -- -" rrr. ", A SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 1 1 296A 3068 5 - 29 S - 15 E 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 3:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Wayne, Engineering has completed review of subject application and updated Permit Plan. Only condition of approval: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 9 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:13 PM To: 'Paul V. Sherma, P.E.' Subject: RE: FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road one original (signed/sealed) and 14 copies. -----Original Message----- From: Paul V. Sherma, P.E. [mailto:peer@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:28 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Wayne, I am revising the grading plan to add the trench drain. how may prints do you need? Thanks Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <peer@tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:17 AM Subject: FW: FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Paul - Need to resolve ASAP. Wayne > -----Original Message----- > From: Rice, Scott > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:36 AM > To: Wells, Wayne > Cc: Barker, Brian A. > Subject: FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road > Wayne, > Stormwater issues on this case have not been resolved: > Stormwater > 2. This outfall configuration will be allowed, however, a trench drain across the site driveway should be utilized to disperse the flow to the street. 7/12/05 - RESUBMITTAL DOES NOT SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. TO MINIMIZE IMPACT TO THE ROW, PRIVATE OUTFALL MUST BE ON-SITE. > 3. POND MUST RECOVER IN 24-HOURS, NOT 36-HOURS AS SHOWN IN CALCULATIONS. > D. Scott Rice > Land Devel. Engr. Manager > 727-562-4781 > scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 1 1 • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:09 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 3:24 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Sherry, have checked on all of these and M is okay on all of them. Thanks! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins • IN • • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:00 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI- Email from Anne Blackburn - Fire Thank you Sherry -----Original Message----- From: Blackburn, Anne Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 4:05 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Hi Miss Sherry, checked the resubmittals listed below in your e-mail and listed below is the current status as per Fire: FLD2005-05037 - Conditions Met FLD2005-05046 - Conditions Met FLD2005-05044 - Conditions Not Met FLD2005-05043 - Conditions Not Met FLD2005-05042 - Conditions Not Met FLD2005-06052 - Conditions Met FLD2005-05038 - Conditions Met LUZ2005-05009 - Conditions Met checked these resubmittals today, and based on the info included in the resubmittals, the above listed indicates the status. Thanks for all your help, Sherry, Anne -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 - 1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside *of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. • • We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Barker, Brian A. Subject: FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Wayne, Stormwater issues on this case have not been resolved: Stormwater 2. This outfall configuration will be allowed, however, a trench drain across the site driveway should be utilized to disperse the flow to the street. 7/12/05 - RESUBMITTAL DOES NOT SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. TO MINIMIZE IMPACT TO THE ROW, PRIVATE OUTFALL MUST BE ON-SITE. 3. POND MUST RECOVER IN 24-HOURS, NOT 36-HOURS AS SHOWN IN CALCULATIONS. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • LI Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 - 1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schoditer 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 - 1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins 3.15 m Case Number. FLD2005-05037 -- 1105 DRUID RD p Owner(s): Robert W Wilson Tre Po Box 185 Clearwater, 7 TELEPHONE: No No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Druid Courtyard Clearwater, Llc 710 S Fort Harrison St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-446-9204, FAX: 727-446-9205, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Nicholas Ferraioli 1112 S Missouri Avenue Suite 1 Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-447-4401, FAX: 727-446-9205, E-MAIL: ferraioli@aol.com Location: 1.613 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A Zoning District: HDR, High Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (north) setback _ from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Section 2-504.A. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Downs-Blackburn Applicant: Paul Sherma, Nick Ferraioli, Tom Mullin, Ron Belko, Ray Leon Other: Norma Carlough The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Separate right-of-way permit(s) will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727)562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 56 1 . This DRC Review-by Fire is not an approval or review of any constion plans or documents other than site work. Review and approval by the Authority having Jurisdiction shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. 2. Fire hydrants must be provided within 300 ft of the most remote point of the building (as the hose is laid) for fire fighting purposes. Provide additional hydrants.Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . The building must be protected by a fire sprinkler system as per NFPA-13. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Show on the plan the freestanding FDC (fire department connection) at least 15 ft from the building. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . The freestanding FDC (fire department connection) must be within 40 feet of the fire hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant must be maintained per NFPA-l. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides (including the rear side) of the appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Show on the plan 30 degree turning radii for ingress and egress for emergency vehicle access. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Is there a perimeter fence around the dry detention pond? Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 10. Provide gate type knox boxes for emergency vehicle access as per Pinellas County Ord. 98-04. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 11 . Drain covers and grates in drive aisle must meet HS-20 specifications. Please respond PRIOR TO CDB. 12. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: Legal: No issues. No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Show ALL trees, with their canopies, to be preserved on ALL civil plans prior to CDB. 2. Reroute the storm line eastward away from tree #10 prior to CDB. 3. Provide a lintel system at tree #29 and 37. Extend lintel from dripline to dripline if possible. Provide a detail prior to CDB. 4. Show tree# 7,10 and 45 to be saved prior to CDB. 5. Show all trees rated #2 and below on the inventory to be removed prior to building permit. Lafndscaping: YJ 1 . Revise Sheet 2 to indicate a 15-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer required along MLK Avenue and Druid Road (only a 10-foot buffer indicated along each roadway). Parks and Recreation: I . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , 1. Site does not have a positive outfall and therefore attenuation of the 50yr storm is required per Page 1 of the City of Clearwater drainage criteria. 2. This outfall configuration will be allowed, however, a trench drain across the site driveway should be utilized to disperse the flow to the street. Solid Waste: I . No issues. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 57 1. Remove groundmonument sign out of sight triangle. • 2. Columns for car port must not encroach inside the 9' wide x 19' long dimension of a parking stall. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 58 1 . Revise the descriptof request(s) to that as indicated by Staff. • 2. Interior landscaping indicated on Sheet 2 cannot count those areas within the first 15 feet of Druid Road and MLK Avenue (15-foot perimeter buffer required along both these roads). Revise. J3. Revise Sheets A-3, A-4 and A-5 to indicate the height of the perimeter parapet from the top of the roof deck to the top of all points of the parapet. ?eti4 . Proposed monument sign on MLK Avenue cannot be within the sight visibility triangle and it fl yr' l must meet a five-foot setback from all property lines. \_ J 5 . Provide on Sheet 2 the proposed setback to pavement from the front property line on the north side of the driveway (appears greater than 15 feet). J Provide the anticipated value of the property after the project has been constructed. 7. Ensure the carport structures do not encroach into the drive aisle. 4 . For 71 required parking spaces, only three handicap parking spaces are required. Code requires for attached dwellings parking be screened from adjacent properties by a four-foot 'Zi high landscaped fence or wall. Sheet 2 indicates a 48" high fence, but cross-sections A-A and B-B on Sheet 13 only indicates 42" high fence. Revise Sheet 13. Also, indicate the type of fence or wall proposed. J10. Sheet 2 - Unclear as to what height and material the proposed pool fence is. Provide any details. i l l . Indicate on Sheets A-3 through A-6 the roof deck level (assumed at this point to be 55 feet above what?). J 12 . Provide 24"06" versions of the floor plans (Main Level and Second though Fifth Floor Levels) (previously provided). J13 . General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development will be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." Provide the number of floors or height of the multi-story building on the north side of Druid Road. Address density, etc. of the adjacent properties. J 14 . General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof." Discuss effects of this proposal on the value of adjacent properties. J15. General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood." Address driveway locations, sidewalks, bus stops, etc. in relation to the surrounding development and to MLK Avenue and Druid Road. J16. General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "is designed to minimize traffic congestion." Address number of units and parking spaces, the location of driveways in relation to turn lanes, etc. on MLK Avenue and Druid Road. J 17 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Address the height and character of the adjacent properties, etc. J18 . General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how the design of this proposed development "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." Address any visual impacts, including the proposed height in relation to the adjacent properties, how the project will have the same hours of operation as the adjacent residential properties, etc. 19. Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" #A.6 - Address with specific information as to how the reduction to the front setback (to pavement) for this proposed development is in compliance with "existing structures along the same side of the road" that "have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood." Also, address "the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way." Finally, the proposed reduction (to pavement) "will not adversely affect adjacent property values." 20. The proposed entry feature columns - These will be counted as structures having to meet required setbacks. If so desired where located (I believe two on each side of each driveway on MLK Avenue and Druid Road), provide the proposed setbacks from the front and side property lines to these structures. Provide the overall height to the top of the light fixture. Unclear as to "number" name plate on the column feature (possible signage?) or whether it is the address of the property. Provide additional information of these features. Address the proposed setbacks in all appropriate criteria responses. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 59 Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 60 • 3.15 Pm Case Number: FLD2005-05037 -- 1105 DRUID RD ' PMN Owner(s): Robert W Wilson Tre Box 185 Clearwater, F133757 ? Clearwater, TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Druid Courtyard Clearwater, Llc 710 S Fort Harrison St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-446-9204, FAX: 727-446-9205, E-MAIL: No Email -Ah? J0 Representative: Nicholas Ferraioli fly 1112 S Missouri Avenue Suite 1 Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-447-4401, FAX: 727-446-9205, E-MAIL: ferraioli@aol.com Location: 1.613 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A Zoning District: HDR, High Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Section 2-504.A. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Downs-Blackburn Applicant: Paul Sherma, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Separate right-of-way permit(s) will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727)562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 57 1 . This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any constion plans or documents other than site work. Review and approval by the Authority having Jurisdiction shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. 2. Fire hydrants must be provided within 300 ft of the most remote point of the building (as the hose is laid) for fire fighting purposes. Provide additional hydrants.Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 3. The building must be protected by a fire sprinkler system as per NFPA-13. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Show on the plan the freestanding FDC (fire department connection) at least 15 ft from the building. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . The freestanding FDC (fire department connection) must be within 40 feet of the fire hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant must be maintained per NFPA-1. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides (including the rear side) of the appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Show on the plan 30 degree turning radii for ingress and egress for emergency vehicle access. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Is there a perimeter fence around the dry detention pond? Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 10. Provide gate type knox boxes for emergency vehicle access as per Pinellas County Ord. 98-04. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 11 . Drain covers and grates in drive aisle must meet HS-20 specifications. Please respond PRIOR TO CDB. 12. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Show ALL trees, with their canopies, to be preserved on ALL civil plans prior to CDB. 2. Reroute the storm line eastward away from tree #10 prior to CDB. 3 , Provide a lintel system at tree #29 and 37. Extend lintel from dripline to dripline if possible. Provide a detail prior to CDB. 4. Show tree# 7,10 and 45 to be saved prior to CDB. 5 . Show all trees rated #2 and below on the inventory to be removed prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Revise Sheet 2 to indicate a 15-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer required along MLK Avenue and Druid Road (only a 10-foot buffer indicated along each roadway). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . 1. Site does not have a positive outfall and therefore attenuation of the 50yr storm is required per Page 1 of the City of Clearwater drainage criteria. 2. This outfall configuration will be allowed, however, a trench drain across the site driveway should be utilized to disperse the flow to the street. Solid Waste: l . No issues. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 58 1. Remove grouncrmonuient sign out of sight triangle. • 2. Columns for car port must not encroach inside the 9' wide x 19' long dimension of a parking stall. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 59 I . Revise the description of request(s) to that as indicated by Staff. • 2. Interior landscaping indicated on Sheet 2 cannot count those areas within the first 15 feet of Druid Road and MLK Avenue (15-foot perimeter buffer required along both these roads). Revise. 3. Revise Sheets A-3, A-4 and A-5 to indicate the height of the perimeter parapet from the top of the roof deck to the top of all points of the parapet. 4. Proposed monument sign on MLK Avenue cannot be within the sight visibility triangle and it must meet a five-foot setback from all property lines. 5 . Provide on Sheet 2 the proposed setback to pavement from the front property line on the north side of the driveway (appears greater than 15 feet). 6. Provide the anticipated value of the property after the project has been constructed. 7. Ensure the carport structures do not encroach into the drive aisle. 8 . For 71 required parking spaces, only three handicap parking spaces are required. 9. Code requires for attached dwellings parking be screened from adjacent properties by a four-foot high landscaped fence or wall. Sheet 2 indicates a 48" high fence, but cross-sections A-A and B-B on Sheet 13 only indicates 42" high fence. Revise Sheet 13. Also, indicate the type of fence or wall proposed. 10. Sheet 2 - Unclear as to what height and material the proposed pool fence is. Provide any details. 11 . Indicate on Sheets A-3 through A-6 the roof deck level (assumed at this point to be 55 feet above what?). 12. Provide 24"x36" versions of the floor plans (Main Level and Second though Fifth Floor Levels) (previously provided). 13 . General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development will be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." Provide the number of floors or height of the multi-story building on the north side of Druid Road. Address density, etc. of the adjacent properties. 14. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof." Discuss effects of this proposal on the value of adjacent properties. 15 . General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood." Address driveway locations, sidewalks, bus stops, etc. in relation to the surrounding development and to MLK Avenue and Druid Road. 16. General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "is designed to minimize traffic congestion." Address number of units and parking spaces, the location of driveways in relation to turn lanes, etc. on MLK Avenue and Druid Road. 17. General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposed development "is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Address the height and character of the adjacent properties, etc. 18. General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how the design of this proposed development "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." Address any visual impacts, including the proposed height in relation to the adjacent properties, how the project will have the same hours of operation as the adjacent residential properties, etc. 19. Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" #A.6 - Address with specific information as to how the reduction to the front setback (to pavement) for this proposed development is in compliance with "existing structures along the same side of the road" that "have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood." Also, address "the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way." Finally, the proposed reduction (to pavement) "will not adversely affect adjacent property values." 20. The proposed entry feature columns - These will be counted as structures having to meet required setbacks. If so desired where located (I believe two on each side of each driveway on MLK Avenue and Druid Road), provide the proposed setbacks from the front and side property lines to these structures. Provide the overall height to the top of the light fixture. Unclear as to "number" name plate on the column feature (possible signage?) or whether it is the address of the property. Provide additional information of these features. Address the proposed setbacks in all appropriate criteria responses. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 60 0 Other: No Comments • Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 61 0 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. tLb zooms 0,5"037 Meeting Date: Location: IN -•, 0 ? Current Use: ? Active Code Enforcement C ? Address number (yes) (n vacant I ? Landscaping (ye (no ? Overgrown (yes (no ? Debris (yes) (no) ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (ye (no ? Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor vacant land ? Fencing (none) (good apid ), (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes no ? Residential Parking Violations (yes no ? SignagejpAage (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking stripe (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ? Outdoor storage (yes) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: 6Reviewed by: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 Telephone: 5z.\--!(? A ., 0 • Case Number: FLD2005-05037 -- 1105 DRUID RD Owner(s) Robert W Wilson Tre Po Box 185 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Druid Courtyard Clearwater, Llc 710 S Fort Harrison St Clearwater, FI 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-446-9204, FAX: 727-446-9205, E-MAIL: No Email Representative Nicholas Ferraioli 1112 S Missouri Avenue Suite 1 Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-447-4401, FAX: 727-446-9205, E-MAIL: ferraioli@aol.com Location: 1.613 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A - Al Ruud Zoning District: HDR, High Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 18.3 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement and pool deck) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Section 2-504.A. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, F133761 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): 1120 Kingsley St. Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 10 i Division of Corporations 0 • Page 1 of 2 : i 1u?t+i ?tt?tzi.?rtr Ay Florida Limited Liability DRUID COURTYARD CLEARWATER, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVE, STE 106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 MAILING ADDRESS 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVE, STE 106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 Document Number FEI Number L05000017702 NONE State Status FL ACTIVE Total Contribution 0.00 Date Filed 02/18/2005 Effective Date NONE Registered Agent Name & Address FERRAIOLI, NICHOLAS IF 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVE, STE 106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 Manager/Member Detail Titl Add e ress Name & ND INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES, LLC 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVE, STE 106 [El CLEARWATER FL 33756 Annual R Year orts Filed Date http ://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet. exe?a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO5000017702&n2=NAMF WD... 6/2/2005 Division of Corporations Previous Filing , Return to List No Events No Name History Information • Page 2 of 2 Next Filing Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help P http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=L05000017702&n2=NAMFWD... 6/2/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 15 29 15 00000 340 0 Page 2 of 5 15 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 340 / 0300 02-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:54:49 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales CLEARWATER LAND LTD OBK: 14080 OPG: 2506 17480 DALLAS PKWY STE 1 DALLAS TX 75287 EVACUATION ZONE: NONE Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 259.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 1 /2,005 14,08012,506 685,000 (0) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 193,200 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 193,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 193,200 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 4,437.69 1) 265 x 262 5. 00 69,930. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 4,437.69 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 4,437.69 Short Legal FROM NW CDR OF SE 1/4 OF SW 114 TH S 33FT TH E 30FT Description FOR POB TH E 265.16FT TH S 262.16FT TH W 265.16FT TH Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 t Pinbllas County Property App*r Information: 15 29 15 00000 340 06 15 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 340 / 0300 Page 3 of 5 02-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 17:54:49 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vac ant Extra F at ur s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) . 00 0 , 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) Fi1w RIE? M http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 Pilellas County Property Appoer Information: 15 29 15 00000 340 06 Page 4 of 5 ..? t" ar I V G ? BARBEE 70WERS uc}6 lal? I GR I RRDI DRDG RDIG 0 z BS Iloo G h,11D 300 MARTIN ICC)4 LUTHEP JI R D R? T L U NAA. T LUT 0 r, I? SNA IJ sMIt? E I[?IC` A? VAY JA FEE' W 2 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 WAY Pinellas County Property App?er Information: 15 29 15 00000 340 06 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 NAL pR',? ; NARRATIVE & DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR THE COURTYARD , - PREPARED FOR: DRUID COURTYARD CLEARWATER LLC 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE, SUITE 106 CL EARW ATER, FLORIDA . 33756, APRIL 2005 RECEIVED MAY 18 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER © PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. 2005 .,.,.., 646 94T" AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33702 _ a• • • • • • . PHONE: (727) 576-2007 lv? •' FAX: (727) 576-3537 • U. Y7 W .J i > 7d • ?? ' co THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERV FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. SHALL BE WIT. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. N\" \ 7 1 Narrative: THE COURTYARD The Courtyard project is located in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County. The property is located at the ' southeast corner of Druid Road and Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue within Section 15, Township 29 S, Range 15E. A Site Location Map has been provided as Figure 1. ' The Courtyard property is shown on the Southwest Florida Water Management District Aerial Contour Map, Figure 2. The Courtyard will consist of 47 condominium units, one (1) clubhouse with a pool constructed on 1.60 acres. The project will be constructed in one (1) phase. The Pinellas County Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 12103 C0108 G dated September 3`d , 2003 -indicates the project site is in Zone X. Please see Figure 3: A. The existing land uses surrounding The. Courtyard project are North: Druid Road South: Apartment project East: Apartment project West: Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue B... There. are..no .wetlands or improvements on the site... The site is vacant. C. The remainder of this document will concentrate on providing the necessary information for the design of the proposed Stormwater Facilities. D. In determining the pre-condition drainage basin, the topographic survey by Fred C. Duel and Associates, Inc. and the Southwest Florida Water Management District were utilized. E. EXISTING DRAINAGE NARRATIVE : Provided as Figure 4 is a copy of the survey prepared by Fred C. Duel and Associates, Inc. As shown on the survey, the site sheet flows from the southwest corner of the site to the northeast corner of the site. EA ON-SITE BASIN A (PRE-CONDITION) : E.1 a ON-SITE DRAINAGE AREA BASIN - A (PRE-CONDITION) : Drainage Area = 1.60 Acres Model flow. from On-Site Basin A as a runoff hydrograph to the east property line. Please see Figure 5. NARRATIVE & DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR 2 ' E.1b ON-SITE BASIN - A SOILS GROUP (PRE-CONDITION) : Up = Urban Land - Pomello Complex. Please see Figure 6. ' Use Soil Group "A" because the seasonal high water table is deep and able to percolate surface water runoff. Conservative approach for Pre-Condition Peak Runoff rate. ' E.1c ON-SITE BASIN A LANDUSE PRE-CONDITION : ' The existing land use is grass, good condition. ' lE.ld --ON-SITE BASIN A CURVE NUMBER (PRE-.CONDITION): Figure 7 gives the Curve number table as established by SCS. 1 HYDROLOGIC AREA X LANDUSE - SOIL GROUP"`' AREA fAc: CN NUMBER CN NUMBER 40 62 Grass A 1.60 39 . 160 62.40 CN = 62.40/ 1.60 = 39 E.1 e ON-SITE BASIN A (PRE-CONDITION): Use SCS Method to calculate Runoff Volume. Q = P-0.2S 2 P + 0.85 S = 1000 - 10 = 1000 - 10 = 15.60 CN 80 ' 25 YR-24 HR RAINFALL P = 9.0" Please see Figure 8. ' E.1 f ON-SITE BASIN A TIME OF CONCENTRATION PRE-CONDITION : ' The Kinematic Equation was used to calculate the pre-condition time of concentration. KINEMATIC EQUATION Total.Tc. Length = 367 Ft. 3 I L ' SHEET FLOW: Tc = (0.007) (n L) 1.8 (Please see Figure 9) ' (p2)0.s (S)0.4 N = 0.24 Dense Grass (Please see Figure 9) ' S = 45.5-41.8/367 =0.0101 ' Pz = 3.6 inches Tc = (0.007) (0.24 x 300) 0.8 = 0.71 Hrs. (3.6) 05 (0.0101)0.4 ' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW: Surface Description = Unpaved Flow-Length- 67- S = 0.0098 Average Velocity = 16.1345(S)0-5 (Please see Figure 9) ' = 16.1345(0.0101)0-5 = 1.61 ft. / sec ' Travel Time = Length = 67 Ft. = 41.61 sec Velocity 1.61 Ft. / sec ' 41.61 sec x 1 min x 1 hr. = 0.012 Hrs. 60 sec 60 min 1 Total Travel Time = 0.71 + 0.012 = 0.73 Hr. ' E.Ig EXISTING ON-SITE BASIN A DEPRESSION: STAGE AREA Ac. NONE 4 ' E.2 OFF-SITE BASIN 1 (PRE-CONDITION): E.2a OFF-SITE DRAINAGE AREA BASIN -1 (PRE-CONDITION) ' Drainage Area = 0.16 Acres (East half of Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue adjacent to the site that sheet flows onto the site from the southwest corner of the site to the northeast corner ' of the site) Model flow from Off-Site Basin 1 as a Runoff Hydrograph to the northeast corner of the site. E.2b OFF-SITE BASIN -1 SOILS GROUP (PRE-CONDITION) : Up = Urban Land - Pomello Complex. Please see Figure 6. Use Soil Group "A" because the seasonal high water table is deep and able to percolate surface water runoff. Conservative approach for Pre-Condition Peak Runoff rate. E.2c Off-SITE BASIN - 1 LANDUSE (PRE-CONDITION) The existing land use is grass and impervious. ' E.2d OFF-SITE BASIN -1 CURVE NUMBER (PRE-CONDITION): ' Figure 7 gives the Curve number tablecas•established by. SCS:.- LANDUSE Grass Impervious . - HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A A 0.07 0.09. ... 0.16 CN = 11.55 / 0.16 = 72.19 E.2e OFF-SITE BASIN - 1 (PRE-CONDITION) : Use SCS Method to calculate Runoff Volume. Q = P-0.2S 2 P + 0.8S S = 1000 - 10 = 1000 - 10 = 3.85 CN 72.19 AREA (Ac.) 5 CN NUMBER 39 .. 98 AREA X CN NUMBER 2.73 8.82 11.55 ' 100 YR-24 HR RAINFALL P = 12.0" Please see Figure 8. ' 25 YR-24 HR RAINFALL ' P = 9.0" Please see Figure 8. E.2f OFF-SITE BASIN - 1 TIME OF'CONCENTRATION-(PRE-CONDITION) : ' The Kinematic Equation was used to calculate the pre-condition time of concentration. KINEMATIC EQUATION L = 27+367=394 ' Tc = . (0.007) (n L P--' (Please. see Figure.- 9). (P2)o.s (S)1.4 ' N = Paved (0.011) + Grass ( 0.24) (Please see Figure 9) ' N average = (0.011 x 15') + (0.24x-379') f 394' - 4.165 + 90.96 / 394 = 0.231 ' L .. ° 28. P2 = 3.6 inches ' S = 46.10 - 41.80 /394 = 0.0109 % (Please see Figure 5) ' Tc = (0.007) (0.231 x 300 = 0.67 (3.6)05 (0.0109)1.4 ' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW: Surface Description = Unpaved ' Flow Length = 94 ' S = 0.0109 Average Velocity = 16.1345(S)0.5 (Please see Figure 9) = 16.1345(0.0109)05 = 1.68 ft. / sec 6 ' Travel Time = Length = 94 Ft. = 55.95 sec Velocity 1.68 Ft. / sec ' 55.95 sec x 1 min x 1 hr. = 0.016 Hrs. 60 sec 60 min ' Total Travel Time = 0.67 + 0.016 = 0.69 Hr. ' E.2g EXISTING OFF-SITE BASIN -1 DEPRESSION : STAGE AREA Ac. ' NONE ' E.3 PRE - CONDITION SUMMARY PEAK DISCHARGE: The 25Yr Pre-Condition Peak Discharges-are-given below": • ' BASIN • 25YR - 24HR PEAK DISCHARGE . . BASIN A 0.65 CFS ' OFFSITE BASIN-1- 0.32 CFS" 0.97 CFS ' Provided as Figure 10 are the Pre-Condition Peak Discharge Runoff Hydrographs. ' F. POST-CONDITION NARRATIVE: One (1) Dry Detention Pond will be constructed to provide water. quality treatment and attenuation. As required by the City of Clearwater Stormwater requirements, the discharge for the detention pond will be designed to the 25 year storm event. ' F.1 BASIN A (POST-CONDITION) : F.1a DRAINAGE AREA (POST-CONDITION) : Drainage Area = 1.60 Acres ' The surface water runoff discharges into Detention Pond A. (Please see Figure 11) ' F.1b -SOILS GROUP (POST-CONDITION) : Up = Urban Land - Pomello Complex. 7 Use Soil Group "A" because the seasonal high water table is deep-and able to percolate surface water ' runoff. Conservative approach for Pre-Condition Peak Runoff rate. F.1c LANDUSE (POST-CONDITION) : The proposed land uses are: Grass ' Dry Detention Pond "A" ' Impervious ' FJd CURVE NUMBER (POST-CONDITION) Figure 7 gives the Curve number table as established by SCS. HYDROLOGIC- LAN USE SOIL GROUP AREA Lc.) CN NUMBER Pervious A 0.34 ' Detention Pond A 0.26 ' Impervious- .. .. D 1.001- 1.60 CN = 137.26/1.60 = 85.79 ' S = 1000 - 10 = 1000 - 10 = 1.66 CN 85.79 ' N CONDITION) : POST F.1e ( TIME OF CONCENTRATIO - ' Use a Tc = 10.00 Min. = 0.17 Hr. F.If STAGE -VOLUME FOR DETENTION POND "All: ' Stn e Area - (Ac.) Volume (Ac. Ft.) 45.00 0.26 0.26 + 0.17 / 2 x 3 = 0.65 ' 42.00 0.17 0 8 39 100 98. . AREA X CN NUMBER 13.26 26.00 98.00 137.26 I F.2 Y7." WATER QUALITY VOLUME( BASINS A, B, C AND OFF-SITE BASIN A): ' Volume = 1.60 1.60 Ac. x %2" x 1 Ft. / 12 in = 0.067 Ac. Ft. 2,904.00 CF ' Off-Site Basin 1 will be routed around the site via a drainage swale. ' Figure 12 gives the stage-volume curve for Detention Pond A. The water quality stage is 42.37 Ft. NGVD. Please see Figure 12. The seasonal high water elevation is 37.OOFt. NGVD. Please see Figure 18. The outfall structure bleed down slot will be set at 42.37 Ft. NGVD. Underdrain will be used to ' treat the water quality volume. ' BLEED DOWN CALCULATIONS: Provided as Figure 13 are the underdrain calculations. The Water Quality Volume will percolate within ' 24 Hrs. G. POST - CONDITION RESULTS: Provided as Figure 14 is the computer output results for the 25Yr - 24Hr storm event. As shown on Figure 14, the post-condition 25Yr - 24Hr peak discharge is 0.94 CFS which is less than the pre- condition peak discharge of 0.97 CFS. Provided as Figure 15 are the computer input data results for the 25Yr - 24Hr storm event. ' H. STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS: Provided as Figure 16 is the Storm Sewer Basin Plan as well as the Storm Sewer Calculations. 1. Water and Sewer will be provided by the City of Clearwater. ' I Figure 17 is a copy of the Owner's Maintenance and Operation Instructions for the proposed The Courtyard Stormwater System. K. Provided as Figure 18 is a photocopy of the RC Kannan & Associates, Inc. geotechnical report. ' L. Enclosed as Figure 19 is a photocopy of the Warranty Deed. M. The Courtyard Homeowner's Association will maintain the storm water management system. N. The site contractor has not been selected at this time. ' O. There are no existing well on the site. P. There are no Southwest Florida Water Management District wetlands and threatened species on the site. 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q. The Article of Incorporation for the Homeowner's Associations have been included with the submitted package. R. DEWATERING SUMP CALCULATIONS: Since the pond is dry, no dewatering calculations are required. P:\WPDOCS\2003 JOBS\03-1460\DRAINAGECALCS\DRAINCAL02-28-05.wpd 10 I 0 J J FIGURES 'Ey1AY r a .. = I i r ?yl y2rn I I o d ?MM BLUB $E MIT S4 \ - EPfRN ST ii i t' rFs __ CEO R X[ ,SOUS STN HIBISCUS D 4'r b y?; la ' ¢ I I :'V? S%IMCiBT a MEtto ST 1 D = 1'{ BONAIR o W PALMFTTD MIBISLQS H < « < _.. ,.A La CEDAR ST PALMETT $I syn. .1 ;l ON"NICNOTSON ° : I CXOIIO $T WALNUT i LAV. r 6T ' - T _ xi u 3 r91..IZr .? SIC OU N DfYDX DIO m Bwt ND a- ° ELMw000 o ST - ,., 'T Q RAtgp MINGLE ° ST$ti19m SEMINOLE ST HOBART y BYf .. ? •' ? R106E :' ? ?_ z = > sMAUwDDD K ITN MBIA ?` 9?9 / ST _ T El RIDGE IT - CO " aRbC T? T R' &b!c [rcj,Jv q f ( u, > MAP E ° ATE D ,y H • ?' > t RILE t S ST D \ 'SLY AIRP SIDE qGS `? < EA s < < i AGX MD gIDCEwD ,MST OME x ICL GEORGIA ST W ST _ < (S IS11 L Do K ; tR[S SI DS C BAyW....:. y /. (//? 4y SUNSET E, 6ROYE ST 0 CROYE Si NENOgICNS l igIYD CT UHRR , LAURA rt o NE ?St GROVE _ `ST $ LAURA ST > w' ` CLEVELAND ST KE STOP < o. w ? sr MAN o -?'? T s: J ; h PrEtYEj mi PARK ST MCA PARK «ST'- HARVARD ST t " a'W o T A /? tY Hail ST g. Q PIEflL ST • MERGE n PIERCE ?/ '?'k ARTMO TH Si . a r r A y : Pia sr ST ST CREST - « AR Ll tv'"' h ?? '? R FRANKLIN Ll-„t CO T N ± ?LL ST ?I`u, C.4 ° ¦.. KLO UTR STe sAx ®A - use ° : EAAR SA I. D .Pot ROWXELL ST N > NAT / g36 CxESTNUr $T 15 COURT/ 4 ST N If GERS T R r; C [ _ ., z ROGER ST ROSE R5= ST ''>. I••i ...•` °- i TURNER i ST TURNER ST W $ NRNER S i z y g?jpY < /, /' > ixagO aRKG YI T = URNERm c < _ tntr TUR R" a ST TI /' < . nAC z PINE I ST cc Y T x - = 3 MARION i PINE / ./ ° ; c PINE IT J > A , "TD UIDtD RD ; m Y sr m ASMIME WA ? ASMIM Y ? ?, IASMIXE WAY JASMIN wqY ? mJASAtIxE wA k_[TStONF ? MIN ` W HosDMA6MOLIA DR r l tr Au'Ta 7 6NOlIA DR Q A6NOLIA < D\ r? A6MNE A DR _ tc m tT > NOSTO MA6XOLU A SF , ° I lf+ O _ z x =i., i MAC Oll1 Q MACN: IBfUS m PATH m LOTUS iu, PATI? Tus r. = LOTUS PATH L.J cT < Y ` / . W ; ¢ BUDlE16H Si MCffON[ _ ¢ ° { 7 ?.1L t ( '. 't IEfFORM H I,TSi t f.1EFFOR Sf u i ATx¢,r+,? N <° AFFORDS •+ST o e DART -' IMmLmIPI+. s . - •T AVE BARRY EFF RO ; ; MOREL GRAND C RAE ST z L ARRria< ?. s •>-, VEt ^ I t"- r',` } / ?.:L ?.. n. / >!• O ascot si GATE 3 3 USCOLA RD n Db =-z r ; ST ¢ W ' '., `> 1 r K7'i / `? _ '[? "PIN ELL <Sr Si PINELLAS o m EU6EN11 ST y '?• Us MIL ON_ Z ILII IS R o L? DA 9 VILLA Lae RE TU WrLU n < e a L,?L, r } ° ° Au '_ < S OWMIN - KN TTAWA ' RO' °s OOD w xej ?'l `fig// CORBETT SST ` A Si > LAKEVIEw HILL= RO : ACRE LAID a 7 k Y vv .If. BLDRIDE B T P 6 Li s H' < a x YALEIICIA W ST C EMERALD 5 S S" I ° S.I 3 r+ 4 OaMANOY PARK OR OR _ '? : UKEYIE'N or,?r'f - < a mtY ANGERI ST' Al ORA 7 OR r SOUfR _ O W RACEL DR COE RD « D $ '<°9• o N - Fes, _ {°_ ?J SUMA Sf• SATSUMA ST PINEYI00 0 - e MAATx ?? 'f /p ?A'p 1 1 ° `' F ; m x 25T Q 3 ?_C S DRAN6E ST OR G X51 PARRSIDE O'DR a ¢° U C •f:• AC B E E M IN600 E Si ST v BELLEVU KIX6SlEY9 >F ST o AMI ? " Y - ; " U 3 K? l ° _ m DTAE sT Y3 ulAwoD DR / e f ?. PEMC LIME ST t :" ^7. 4/ ?yo ?v/E 9° : srE ;T. ". QUEEN i Q m W tt EMPIE ST CITRUS ST WX w h D < 'o (BULL 18 Y.TF. v yam„ Pv ?e s° xaayEy? LMA IT OV CHRUS ST FAURW000 OR HUNT IL T / / v v? YL BELIE IER IlV 1A E LEVIEW B VD LEMON 51 ELLEVIE ?; '- t 4 =xaaars u LEMON ST _ pNptypO -?? ° RELIC J"EK„Eo f tdl /•.. SiA ORE -µ. J WILOWOO WA L pe < v ` SEABREFII Sr OR as l,.rJ(E FO2 ISLAN EIy Da coo INN W 1i m ? xuflsERr r RD Mule LT N flOEA<M j y,, ; I ERxON Ett i a ROSE 5T 1° LLA?Q jF d wlNfi[lD° ?LA 'N F. ???EIII / / I ? RDGiio Q 6 ' i < i n i PoSACT`0 Oa RE6AL R0 I F EIE-_ L INri[UU.ESr I ?, /RIND Y RD NOW RD Yt1R ST } INfI [ e ? /... ° ,e ... U « 3 1 f BELIA?SE DR? fADIDS •• flRAO - I •NOMAIID ``. egrAN>- « cT WRDW00° RD °N fNE « SEA EI M ? NO w '? DR tr_ ""E BELLEAIR f ' a RD AA u ~ _ - na CA PBELLi ¢ _ . - TIMMOXS TER r. sT J l M641 E H ¢ RE R`C 91 CARL` VE - QAYVIEW Co Ofl f u «m I R ANU PALM ES $ ITH $T 'Yq? Fi NnwK x IT 2? BUNION 'Y N R> N Y ~?/ 4V - ° - > > •` .-LL / ? ` Capp T4 _ 5T _ ? ? SENECA 7 HALL ¢ ? > s L _ _ _ ?O. LEON BLVD ' w'<WYATT ST "' PON E? OE LEO VO THflIO E IDRaAIx D S O. °F PONLE W DE RTMOUIII-DR a e° > v R 3 r oLDNeus a °STRAIFOR DR SUFiOIK I R a 'q ?( /? BELLEAI °? ?o °"y _? SLEOU. Ro = WOBO? ERSONw _ a[°- ;eALtDA °_ ° H CROTDOX-0R='A°c M D ?.. ;I,.? q(?g o ° WAr "NEW EASET°: :o -AUGUR SI kINtX = W ARBORD Liz 3 SN e v so ./ ' ?_. i ` wlxosDR N `NARBURY OR : INr• /,? * ?0T.1 qD t / , o a. LEISURE DR C F ° o Ap ?q? e a i MUD ON NEW YORK T 29; » W ,p q TTj E IUCINION- t j GESTERt1 W J= 3 CAMBRIDGE @/' T ORLANDD RDA D 4 c _' E[ WYOA IASPER A' iTORONTOX0'.C RIGA _M W N OROt bDDRIDGE ''J'. F WO * ° I A 1 n ICT 1 woo Y R J pN CT w D' C PENN"S GA = u F cc ESTATE xaiE6 a s L 6 BEY[ F o AR ?? m TERESA O Z[ OP .^ FIEF ¢ .; ureP Ev S o yv Ciq = wttcD[t -'An ANDREA DR ?uINLETtt WOO C2 "TH U 3 6 i vE tt _ u ? N WAGE ?= R Y'D ?~ I r ...EAGLE i? E?SYOO'o° -3 = Irt[cxx6Dm _ ur" Erc V REGINA OR Aquxswla caqua • LEISd IDL R KI rROS RD .1R'NE AE ..",=? ?° "' ? ° oo 4 ELLS I. LUlnciD IrxA t <It ALr'` ? urnTOiuW ? e?e°l mxCi" NAk ? ?? QQ ? / h a•W z=? W<J m.p 4?5V Ws ANIU ° T RLE `OR_- `i-_1/ ?TG? .fDP -.. '" i? '? a '•' L7 0 -ICONCOADI OTX AYI ? ARga $ bEL aD ¢ W °° « ?J\? E?\ - E. Tq < .A,, - O ATgt' W L,P+,, I ' PaP trA G ¢ . _ w > RBO ? ??"",,..?? @ 4 n N. w - IsPU Ow , O = BE I6fMESEE) p' » G 6 gOEN 1R 21.`^q? ` 4y4??0' ¢ 9fX AR a < IR` 95 ?` -11 i _ E Tal ID"D ; W 0 BROOK DR L E pO _ Iix AR t AvE M HLENBALHE `;I,' RO_ FORW > HALE °$ ?a E IRUNF OR AVE [1 6E11;? o5Ew00 S< LA ? I' ° .,, < ag01NAl 1 1 AVE A F SUNSET BAT OR i< o KRA YELMAR ` et t[ «E Av[ G 7TNAR (STREMMA RO) X ' C Z'. Y N a CU Trx A? FvE 7 AVE' `« i AVE ° ? •" s c < [?-?» - 1?ME AY[ ?? LOMNIRCED U v c ?r J er s ¢= r NT M rx AvE^ m 65 YE " 6TH AYE » inaurm WEBSTER AY L AVE $IN AVE - > Z JYR 9? m Q?TOUTHWIN 0 r-° :LO V'STH TER LL « .1. A aE0 M6 Rx AVE - u ° SUN ET STN AYF , O s : c EO60M AYF I LAS ITH AVE 'L f DR JV r. 1[w l AO N 0RVN00K ARI [tOAAN R 6: f< Tx VE a COYNERC[ DR "' - IT AVE ° lot, sr CT T W 3 cc.. uT'- IEARA eEaLEye _ Pr PtNEHURST ° _L, - _ , > ITH C3 =AVE `?'rA Ar 1 J?« E•' A I/j1 Z MAYFlowfa - { 3 AVE IMOMM AW t't CIR M » CIq ,°., ° x ,__, _ ,,. 1 (SEVECTAixs AVE in 1\ Q ?I W MT VERMOX Oaa COROOMRT KEI p? DEL RI AVE = e 7R0 FBAN LIX ?, AVE J Il\P/\ _ ,.J » ,JJ ° IxDIAN 7 aVE MW AYE ^„ .0 Now AYEI J I Y ¢ llefq i LOS 6AT0S.OR X MINED IA o ° PINE VISTA t? RKN AVE .H'3Rf ° t f, Ar[XATw1l m LAx t. [ n 2 " MAKLEY YE C7 SUNSET eLVO -° v ., I I ND A L MSTO K"' ° 2ND AVE 7N0 AY TA EN _ ?} z >° DUMCAX OR .°_. u n ?--fin n 3 « - ~ T t AVE < 1 AYE ISI AR VE IsrAVE ALLEN AVE) T .? N f e P ANOARTIOGRO [. Rim d s vw? a t ALTOS oR Ai a DR vl ' n s L J -AID n w BAY DR v ...... , DEwaR BA?.. I M R 35 a "? P A ° a W = .- ILTMURE F r+, C, ACNSeIiD? ? ti tsr RR u4c son ! =A E) 1 E? _ [?`,'?5,111 AV `; DART N PATLIN CIR ' t JF[ '' HARBOR BLUFF DR :. m ° m r' `, ? LLAEYEIAND"1YE K CLEV ?" L 6rary L Y ° KILGOR[ o RAY 01 ITiosp .? 2N0 A 1 AYES SC » WASNIN6TON DOE AYE) 1xD AW ro ® ° 156 HAVE « y 3 3 iSDNSEI?° OA _ Y AY .? I 3 A o J kEA« yp 3RD j `AVE ADAMS AYE) > N ¢ S PAT I 4TH ?» AVE (HU EP AYE) 1? _ CIR A AV f LA ..`? ao •°< J> W ° J G1N AYE NDRrxrrtw RD € ITH AVE 'OAK AVE SIN AVE J34 ./ f SAVE T rp Iu?P 4r S W PJV,IA H iv » D OO ?, bF ePPE o?'1 RGA GTE AVE 1 Z E AVE }GF GAVE 9 i p Oq 4? ?° W o» g°p?PE r 7 A An - I iTX AVE . (SMrtHI',•i W 7 LAKE_ ° ES R Ok 3•+? of : o7TN P` oo ALI TAY OR- m3 su « ry sswTN ?YILRC? SW 8TH AVE 9 - - --- x ,LD z° e 3 R MET DR ?" A avE y 'NANmvaxl la j' NEW AVENAVE btu ;n Q I$? YI p -iOEIG, °[OS[MAATD ' zElTR12AYE 7i EL YIM SA Y L ? Q TN([T[IG i10 1LRN - a100.V k = D .LE , NiC _ -AY _ t DTX tT ° p DAVE "Y FIGURE' mXw? ?j ,.P 4 /T vE O ' tIx tt A AVE a" M t1TN AYE r„" I i AYE OAN `> OR NONM /e '?/\pC / TJi N < m P ~ ITIN el > LIx » F t3 Av flL ¢ , xRRDII`o`DA/?T "v u q ° m I I A N m - [E « 16H S OR I PDg c ° CT . ° lJ ¢ AVE I]IK 1 Litt ^ I ` 18 _ _ ° I S s LINT _ LJJ rLp? ^ T 4 IITN AVE Ilfll _ C7 E[ « 1J VE _ n e. e ` ° -0 .HAOY BIUFign R I/? I T)Tl -- Cn _ ?m mo HAMLET STREET O /O? C D Om Zp AVENUE AVE fD N rA MISSOURI AVENUE F 1 ZZ O c 0 a O b O s N O MADISON T. m 5 F74- SOUTH MISSOURI A JOINS PANEL 0109 9?r? ?Q?xn a 3 33 Rw3'?B yy363 1u T2?t8 T ?¢n m$mg W ?d?a R n F0? ° ??.? °v ? az P S Sx$ ? 0, 9 m Y? ?t,,,,1 F? ,'6.$ 3a$ r X ?01 l? y O C 9 aq b o o g ]O1 W '9 C O col) r rW'r orv;;'^ > n z z ? m v Z 9 ? ^+ W rrl <°d z a ° I m o ?' C g9s P6 ° v o 4= ccl :w ! N m 7,. x Z RGAEENN 8 9 ? D m N D m g T B 1 c a - ? 7 l yy. r ;f t"w #"w ter ,?S ate 7. f SOIL SURVEY OF`- Pinellas County, Florida ... United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service / In.. cooperation-with University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations Issued September 1972 FIGURE 6" ?l. ??5?7 111 fir. ?.?S°"'t«+?7 %••'+?? A. a " n,,'y4r y- I ? EL ? " 0V } ? ..?r rte-!" Ajr• TR w w' t t ?"T 0$%'F THE COURTYARD SITE LOCATION m P 40 TABLE 5. Estimated engineering Depth Classification. - Soil name and mapping Flood hazard Depth to seasonal high water from _ unit symbol table. surface USDA Inches Pamlico muck:' Pc_______ Every year for 6 to 12 months-_ Less than 10 inches for 6 to 12 0-44 Muck__________________ months. 44-65 Fine sand______________ Paola: PdB-------------- None ------------------------- More than 80 inches all year---- 0-80 Fine sand______________ Pinellas: Pf _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Once in 5 to 20 years for 7 to Less than 10 inches for 1 or 2 0-18 Fine sand --------------- 30 days. months. 18-35 Fine sand____________ 35-54 Fine sandy loam---- ---- 54-80 - Sand------------------- Placid: Pn----------- Every year for 6 months or Less than 10 inches for 2 to 6 0-17 Fine sand ____________-_ more_ months-.. 17-80 Fine sand-------------- Pomello: Po______:_____ None_________________ From 10 to 40 inches for 1 or 2 0-44, Fine sand______________ months. 44-59• Fine sand-------- 59-80 Fine sand______________ Pompano: Pp------- _ ------ ?----- Once in 5 to 20 years for 7 to Less than 10 inches for 1 or 2 0-14 Fine' sand_______________ . 30 days. months. 14-80 Fine sand--------------- Ps- _ _ ----------------- Every year for "1 to 6 months--- Less than 10 inches for 2 to 6 0-14= - Fine sand-- months. 14-80 Fine sand______________ Spoil banks: Sp. No valid estimates can be made. St. Lucie: StB---, - None ------------------- _.____ More than 80 inches all year---- 0-80 Fine sand______________ StC___________________ None ------------------------ More than 60 inches all year---- 0-80 Fine sand-------------- Su -------------------- None_____:__________________ From 10 to 40 inches for less 0-40 Fine sand______________ than 2 months. 40-80 Shell___________________ Terra Ceia: Tc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Every year for 6 to 12 months- _ Less than 10 inches for 6 to 12 0-42 Muck ------------------ months. I 42-65 Peat___________________ Tidal marsh- Td_________ Daily________________________ Less than 10 inches all year----- (') (')---------- Tidal swamp: Ts -------- Daily________________________ Less than 10 inches all year----- (') --------------------- Urban land: Ub, Uc, Uk, Um, Up, UW. No valid estimates can be made. Wabasso: W a ----------- Once in 5 to 20 years for 7 to Less than 10 inches for 1 or 2 0-27 Fine sand -------------- 30 days. months. 27-38 Fine sand______________ 38-50 Fine sandy loam, fine silty clay loam. 50-62 Shell___________________ Wauchula: We _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Once in 5 to 20 years for 7 to Less than 10 inches for 1 or 2 0-26 Fine sand-------------- 30 days. months. 26-35 Fine sand-------------- 35-80 Fine sandy loam, fine silty clay loam. ' Variable. 2 High potential subsidence. 'z. r F' 1 PINELLA•S COUNTY, FLORIDA any mapped area. (No capability or woodland classifica- tion) Urban land-Myakka complex (Um).-About 30 to 50- percent of this complex is Myakka fine sand, of which 15 to 30 percent has been modified by cutting, grading, and shaping. About 25 to 40 percent of this complex is Urban land that is covered with houses, industrial build- ings, other structures, and pavement. Spoil materials from drainage canals and from street excavations have been used to fill low areas or spread on the surface of other soils. Included in mapping are small areas of Adamsville, Astatula, and Immokalee soils that make up no more than 15 percent of any mapped area. Small areas of Made land and small areas more than 75 percent of which are covered with urban-- facilities also are included.. (No capability or woodland classification) Urban land-Pomello complex (Up).-About 25 to 55 percent of this complex is Pomello soils, of which 10 to 25 percent has been modified by cutting, grading, and shaping. About 25 to 40 percent of this complex is Urban land that is covered with houses, industrial buildings, other 'structures, and pavement. Spoil material from grading and leveling operations has been used to fill low areas or has been spread over the surface of other soils. Included in mapping are small areas of Astatula fine sand, Immokalee fine sand, and Myakka fine sand that make up no more than 15 percent of any mapped area. As much as 75 percent of a few small areas is covered with structures and pavement. (No capability or wood- land classification) Urban land-Wabasso complex (Uw).-About 35 to 55 percent' of this complex is Wabasso fine sand, of which 10 to 30 percent has been modified by cutting, grading, and shaping. About 25 to 40 percent of this complex is Urban land- that is covered with houses, industrial buil& ings, other structures, and pavement. Spoil material from drainage canals and from street grading has been used to fill low areas or has been spread on the surface of other soils. Included in mapping are areas of Oldsmar fine sand that make up as much as 15 percent of some mapped areas, and small areas of Pinellas fine sand and Elred fine sand that make up about 5 percent. (No capability or woodland classification) Wabasso Series The Wabasso series consists of nearly level, poorly drained sandy soils that formed in beds of sandy and loamy marine sediments. These soils are on broad lo?v ridges in the flatwoods. Typically, the surface layer is black fine sand about 5 inches thick. Below this is gray, loose, leached fine sand about 22 inches thick. It has a few vertical streaks of very dark gray along root channels. The next layer is black, weakly cemented, very friable fine sand 5 inches thick. Next is dark-brown, very friable fine sand that contains fragments of black, weakly cemented fine sand. This is underlain by dark grayish-brown fine sandy clay loam mottled with olive brown; it is about 6 inches thick. Below this is coarsely mottled dark-brown, olive-brown, and grayish-brown fine sandy loam about 6 inches thick.. Light-gray sand mixed with shell fragments is between 23 depths of about 50 inches and 62 inches. Reaction is very strongly acid to a depth of about 27 inches, slightly acid between 27 and 32 inches, medium acid between 32 and 38 inches, slightly acid between 38 and 50 inches, and mildly alkaline below this depth. The water table normally is at a depth of about 25 .inches. Wabasso soils have low available water capacity, low organic-matter content, and low natural fertility. Perme- ability is rapid to a depth of 27 inches; moderate between 27 and 50 inches, and rapid below this depth. Representative profile of Wabasso fine sand: Al-0 to 5 inches, black.(lOYR 2/1) fine sand; weak, fine, crumb struUtire; very friable; mixture of organic matter and light-gray sand grains; many fine and medium roots; very strongly acid; gradual, smooth boundary. AZ-5 to 27 inches, gray (IOYR 6/1) fine sand; single grain; loose; few fine and medium roots; few vertical streaks of very dark gray along root channels; very strongly acid; clear, smooth boundary, B21i=27 to -32-inelres, black (5YR 2/1) fine sand; massive; firm; weakly cemented, crushes easily with slight pressure; sand grains well coated with organic matter; many fine and medium roots; few gray streaks along root channels; slightly acid; clear, smooth boundary. B3 & Bh-32 to 38 inches, dark-brown (7.5YR 3/2) . fine sand; weak, fine, crumb structure; very friable; most sand grains coated with organic matter; common fine roots; weakly cemented; common fragments of black (5YR 2/1) along root channels; medium acid,; gradual, smooth boundary. B'21t-38 to 44 inches, dark grayish-brown (10YR 4/2) fine sandy clay loam; common, medium and coarse, dis- tinct, olive-brown (2.5Y 4/4) mottles; moderate, medi- um, subangular blocky structure; firm; many fine and medium roots; sand grains are bridged and coated with clay; slightly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. B'2Ztr-44 to Winches, coarsely mottled, dark-brown (10YR 3/3), olive-brown (2.5Y 4/4), and grayish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) fine sandy loam; weak, moderate, subangular blocky structure; slightly sticky; common fine roots; sand grains are bridged and coated with clay; slightly acid; clear, wavy boundary. IIC-50 to 62 inches, light-gray (2.5Y 712) sand and shell fragments; single grain; loose; mildly alkaline; calcareous: The Al horizon ranges from dark gray to black and is 4 to 7 inches thick. The A2 horizon is gray to light-gray sand or fine sand and is 10 to 23 inches thick. Depth to the B21i horizon is 20 to 30 inches. This horizon is dark reddish-brown, dark-brown, or black sand or fine sand and is 4 to 12 inches thick. The Bh horizon ranges from slightly acid to very strongly acid. In many places a B3 & Bh horizon, 4 to 6 inches thick, is below the Bh horizon. It is dark-brown to dark grayish-brown sand and has black, weakly cemented nodules of sand scattered through it. The B'2t horizon occurs at depths of 29 to 40 inches. It is gray to dark grayish-brown and brownish-yellow sandy loam or sandy clay loam and is mottled with gray, olive, olive brown, grayish brown, brownish yellow, and strong brown. The lower part of the B'2t horizon is more strongly mottled and, in places, contains carbonate along root channels and light-gray to white secondary carbonate material. The B't horizon ranges from medium acid to mildly alkaline. A IIC horizon of gray sand mixed with shell fragments occurs below the B'2t horizon,.cpm- monly within a depth of 60 inches. In places the IIC horizon is as much as 15 feet thick. The water table is within a depth of 10 inches for 1 or 2 months during wet seasons. The rest of the year it is at a depth of 10 to 40 inches. The Wabasso soils mapped in Pinellas County have a B horizon that is less acid than the range defined for the series. Thrs difference does nbt' appreciably affect use or management. Wabasso soils are associated with Astor, Elred, Felda, Mana- tee, Myakka, Oldsmar, and Pompano soils. They are not so poorly drained as Astor, Pompano, and Manatee soils. They have a Bh horizon that is lacking in Elred, Felda, and Pompano soils. They have a loamy Bt horizon that is lacking in Myakka 1 46 I _f, H 1 H SOIL SURVEY TABLE 6. Engineering interpretations Soil series and b Suitability as a source of- Soil features affecting- map sym ols Topsoil Road fill Shells Highway location Excavated ponds Urban land: Ub, Uc, Uk, Um, U P, Uw. No interpretations; properties too variable. Wabasso: Wa----------- Poor: texture-_ Poor: high Good below a High water. table; oc- Loose sandy surface water table. depth of 4 casional flooding. layer; shell substratum. feet. Wauchula: WC ---------- Poor: texture-- Fair: high Not available--- High water table; oc- Loose sandy surface water table. casional flooding. layer. liquid. The plasticity index is the numerical difference between the liquid limit and the plastic limit. It indicates the range of moisture content within which a soil material is plastic. Engineering properties of the soils Table 5 gives estimates of soil properties important in engineering. The estimates are based on soil test data given in table 4, on experience in working with the soils, and on experience with similar soils in other counties. The estimates apply only to soils in Pinellas County. Some of the terms used in table 5 are defined in the following paragraphs. _. Flood hazard refers to water standing or flowing above the surface of soil that is not artificially drained. Depth to the seasonal high water. table refers to the highest level- the water table is likely to reach during a normal wet season. Permeability refers t*--the rate at which water moves downward through undisturbed and uncompacted. soil when it is not restricted by a water table. The rate is expressed in inches per hour. The available water capacity, measured in inches of water per inch of soil, is the capacity of soils to hold water available for use by most plants. It is commonly defined as the difference between the amount of soil water at field capacity and the amount at wilting point. The following terms are used to express available water capacity: less than 0.05 inch, very low; 0.05 to 0.10, low; 0.10 to 0.15, medium; 0.15 to 0.20, high; and more than 0.20, very high. Reaction refers to the acidity or alkalinity of the soils. It is the estimated range in pH values for-gach major horizon as determined in the field. A pH of 7 indicates a neutral soil, a lower pH value indicates acidity, and a higher value indicates alkalinity. The shrink-swell potential of a soil refers to the change in volume that results from a change in moisture content. It is estimated on the basis of the amount and type of clay. In general, soils classified as CH in the Unified system or A-7 in the AASHO system have high shrink- swell potential. Clean sand and gravel and soils that con- tain only a small amount of nonplastic to slightly plastic soil material have low shrink-swell potential. Engineering interpretations -.' Table 6 rates the soils-according to their suitability as a source of topsoil, road fill, and shells. It also gives features that adversely affect the use of the soils for highways, farm ponds, • embankments, drainage and irrigation systems, and ditches and canals. These features should be taken into account in considering a soil for the stated use. Terms used in table 6 are defined in the follow- ing paragraphs. Topsoil is fertile soil material that is used to topdress roadbanks, parks, gardens, and lawns. Suitability as a source for topsoil is affected by the surface texture and the organic-matter content of the soil material and by the depth of the water table. For example, Manatee loamy. fine sand, which has a favorable surface texture and high organic-matter content, is rated poor as a source of topsoil because a high water table severely restricts excavation. Road fill is borrow material used for embankments that support the subbase and base courses below the surface of a road. Suitability as a source of road fill is affected by the texture of the soil, the natural content of water, the shrink-swell potential, and the ease of excavation. Generally, soils that are clayey have a high shrink-swell potential and are not suitable road fill material, whereas sandy soils that contain some binder are suitable. Wetness or a high water table affects the ease of excavation. In Pinellas County, many sandy soils that have otherwise favorable characteristics have a high water table and are rated poor as road fill. Shells are used in much the same wav as road fill material. Suitability as a source of shells is affected mainly by the presence, extent, and quality of workable deposits. A high water table and flooding affect the ease of excava- tion:.- Highway location is affected by a high water table, flood hazard, and seepage, and by the presence of sandy, loamy, or clayey, layers in the soil that affect the bearing capacity and the stability of roadbeds (fig. 4). Farm ponds commonly are constructed by excavating to a depth of several feet below the normal water table. Ground water fills the excavation, and the water level Table 2-2a--Runoff curve numbers for urban areast Corer desorption Curse numbers fur hvdrolosic b011 groulr- n erJge percent cover type and hydrologic condition impenious areal A 8 C. D C"'devetoFed urban areas (vegetationeatablidcdj ry Space 02--Ds. parks, golf courses, cemeteries, oa .............. or condition (grass cover < 50%) .air condition (grass corer 50% to 76`.l~)-.......... od condition (grass cover ? 75%): ------------- ndotss yreas: ed parldng lots, roofs, driveK-23s, etc icluding right-of-,,Aay)_ ------------------------- Bets and roads: ai`ed; curbs and storm sewers (exdndipg right-of-U-21.) ...---•---•--•-•----------------•. iced; open ditches (including right-of-tray)..-_._. ivel (including right-of-nay) ------------------- At Gncluding right-0f--w2y) -------•--------•---- rn desert urban slreas: iral desert landscaping (pervious areas onlyy_ fie_ial desert landscaping (unpervious weed Tier desert shrub frith- 2- to 2-inch sand gra'?el mulch and basin borders). .............. districts: Pgrcial and business-_. ptia] dis .? tricL bt- average lot size: T6.br less (town houses)................. ..... ----------------------------- ref:.--- ....................... ---•..... ......................... - =-- ......................... .............. .y ? urban areas ?'ailed areas (pert-ious areas only, et?tion}z - ----------------------- S'•(CR"s s;re determined using cover types those in table 2-2c)_ _h ire 86 91 q-1 ' condition, and 1. - 02S. eneent impeniou< area shorn x-as oscd toderr3op the c"Tpoaale C1: f. Other ac:-umptiom< arr w; fol}mcr. unpcrvkv4 arex< r'med t.o the drlinkge s)•>;tem, rmpcnioaa>lezs hate a CK of 9?Z. arul per iou= arrxc arr coft? equixsknt to open Y drvlogic condition. CN*r. for other comb-msliorr< of c•owCGaw tnay be computed using fi urr 23 or &I. • ,e cqui? slen[ to (ho<e of pi!:tune. Courpoage (X't; m2y be computed for olher combinat;om< of open qr cr cm-rr t3-pc. F for ruturul de<ert L• ndscJping should bcc-pvted cL,L-?g fxpu e- 23 or 24 based on t}K imptniotr• arry percentage (CS n'iouc area CTS. The pcnious arcs CNsarr arnuned equirslcnt to dc. n Fhrub in poor h% drologk corulition F. to tl-Sc for tine design of tcmporan• rmar a during grading and cvrL<tnxtion should be computed winz 6 urr 13 or 24. BTYe of &vclopment (jmper v;ous aru pcrariag, And Ibc O? :g.Ior the-J.,ca1v grJded per iow-=-Lc IURE;7 G 68 79 Ni &Iq 49 69 ;9 84 39 61 74 80 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 83 89 92 93 76 95 89 91 72 82 87 89 63 77 85. B8 96 96 96 9G 85 8,9 92 94 95 72 81 88 91 93 65 77 85 (110 9-) 38 61 75 83 87 30 57 72 81 8G YS 5-1 70 80 8a 5 f9 51 68 79 84 12 46 65 Ti 8.2 J a c (210-VI-TR 55, Second Ed.. Jun.- i QSUt F 11 I "] i SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT I ? I f I __ L 10.0 I J 1??? I I 11.0 L J TWENTY FOUR HOUR s j ---1 r? ONE HUNDRED YEAR 12.0 - L _ - 1?.0 RETURN PERIOD ??JJ r RAINFALL MAP IO SCALE RAINFALL CONTOUR IN INCHES. r ?e BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA r WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT -- COUNTY BOUNDARY L D-11 I? {..1 j I 1 t I -- 9.0 I FIGURE 8 1 SO FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 1 ? r ? r 7.0 f f ! _? L 8.0 r TWENTY FOUR HOUR - - -1 TWENTY FIVE YEAR 9.0 --- - i RETURN PERIOD - -- r I RAINFALL MAP j 1 11 5=-t 4z- r-. N 9.0 10 0 10 20 30 SCALE MILES 8.0 LEGEND M 1 t r ?? v ? RAINFALL CONTOUR IN INCHES. BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT -- COUNTY BOUNDARY ri ?I I ? I I j 1 1 I L-_? r 7.0 1 j 1 D-9 1 1 Sheet flow Sheet flow is flow over plane surfaces. It usually. occurs in the headwater of streams. With sheet flow, the friction value (Manning's n) is an effective roughness coefficient that includes the effect of raindrop impact; drag over the plane surface; .obstacles such as litter, crop ridges, and rocks; and erosion and transportation of sediment. These n values are for very shallow flow depths of about 0.1 foot or so. Table 3-1 gives Manning's n values for sheet flow for various surface conditions. For sheet flow of less than 300 feet,.use Manning's ' kinematic solution (Overton and Meadows 1976) to compute Tt: ' _ 0.007 (nQ0.8 (Eq. 3-31 Tt (P2)0.5 g0.4 Table 3-1.-Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Surface description n' Smooth surfaces: (concrete,: asphalt; gravel, or bare soil) ..... 0011. .Fallow (no residue) ..:... 0.05. Cultivated sei:s: Residue cover: <20% ..... :.......... .....:. 0.06 Residue cover >20% ...................... 0.17 ' Grass: ........................ Short grass prairie 0.15 Dense grasses2 ............................ 0.24 Bermudagrass .... 0.41 ' Range (natural) ............................. 0.13 ' Woods:3 Light underbrush .......................... 0.40 Dense underbrush ......................... 0.80 'The n values are a composite of information compiled-by Engman (1986) ZIncludes species such as weeping lovegrass, bluegrass, buffalo y grass, blue grama grass, and native grass mixtures. 3When selecting n. rorci'er Mvpr to a 1-.f-; ht of about 0.1 ft. This FIGURE 9 where Tt = travel time (hr), n = Manning's roughness coefficient (table 3-1), L = flow length (ft), P2°= ayear; 24-hour rainfall (in), and s = slope of hydraulic grade line (land slope, ft/ft). This simplified form of the Manning's kinematic solution is based on the following: (1) shallow steady uniform flow, (2) constant intensity of rainfall excess (that part of a rain available for runoff), (3) rainfall duration of 24 hours, and (4) minor effect of infiltration on travel time. Rainfall depth can be obtained from appendix B. Shallow concentrated flow After a maximum of 300 feet, sheet flow usually becomes shallow concentrated flow. The average velocity for this flow can be determined from figure 3-1, in which average velocity is a function of watercourse slope and type of channel. For slopes less than 0.005 ft/ft, use equations given in appendix F for figure 3-1. Tillage can affect the direction of shallow-concentrated flow. Flaw may not always be directly down the watershed slope if tillage runs across the slope. After. determining average velocity in figure 3-1, use equation 3-1 to"estimate travel time for.the shallow concentrated flow segnient. Open channels. Open channels are assumed to begin where surveyed cross section information has been obtained, where channels are visible on aerial photographs, or where blue lines (indicating streams) appear on United States Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle sheets. Manning's equation or water surface profile information can be used to estimate average flow velocity. Average flow velocity is usually determined for bank-full elevation. ,/Andix F: Equations for figures and exhibits F This appendix presents the equations used in procedure applications to generate figures and exhibits in TR-55. Figure 2-1 (runoff equation): Q = where where V = average velocity (ft/s), and s = slope of hydraulic grade line (watercourse slope, ft/ft). These two equations are based on the solution of Manning's equation (Eq. 34) with different assumptions for n (Manning's roughness coefficient) and r (hydraulic radius, ft). For unpaved areas, n is 0.05 and r is 0.4; for paved areas, n is 0.025 and r is 0.2. Exhibit 4 (unit peak discharges for SCS type I, IA, II, and III distributions): CP - 0.2(1000 - 1012 \CN 1 P + 0.8( 000 -101 . CN J Q = runoff (in), ' P =rainfall (in), and CN = runoff curve number. 1 log(q,) ' = Co + Cl log(Te) + C2 [log(` C)12 where Figure 2-3 (composite CN with connected impervious area): q„ = unit peak discharge (csm/in), T, = time of concentration (hr) CN, = CNp + (Pimp/100X98 - CNp) (minimum, 0.1; maximum, 10.0), and where CO, C1, C2 = coefficients from table F-1. CN, = composite runoff curve number, CNp = pervious runoff curve number, and Pimp = percent imperviousness. Figure 2-4 (composite CN with unconnected impervious areas and total impervious area less than 30%): CN, = CNp + (Pimp/100X98 - CNpX1 - 0.5R) where R = ratio of unconnected impervious area to total impervious area. Figure 3-1 (average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow): n aved = 1345 (s)0.5 Paved V = 20.3282 (s)0.5 Figure.6-1_.(approximate detention basin-routing through single- and multiple-stage structures for 24-hour rainfalls of the indicated type): V,,/Vr = CO + Cl (go/gi) + C2 (go/gi)' + C3 (go/gi)3 where VS/Vr = ratio of storage volume (V,) to runoff volume (Vr), qo/qi = ratio of peak outflow discharge (qo) to peak inflow discharge (qi), and CO, C1, C2, C3 = coefficients from table F-2. (210-VI-TR-55,- Second Ed:; June 1986) F-1 .50 - .20 - +? r 4- w n- .06 0 r- N - ,04 r 0 . U C 3 ' .02 - ' .01 - 1 ' .005 - a c ? J: Q IIV II . 1 2 4 6 10 20 Average velocity, ft/sec i Fiore 3-1.-Average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow. 3-2 (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed.,=June 1986) BASIN A,PRE-CONDITION,25YR-24HR TIT HYDROGRAPH FILE......... TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... SCS_256 1.6 FILE.... INPUT ID BAPRE25 110899816 IGHTED SCS CURVE NUMBER.... TITIAL ABSTRACTION FACTOR... 39.0 0.2 TYPE.'..:' RUN, HRS RNF0002' 28.4 TIME OF-CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.73 DT, HRS. 0.1 DATA PTS 285 ' STORM... SCS_IIM DURATION 24.0 RAINFALL 9.0 ' EXCESS.. ACREAGE. 1.602671 1.6 TC, HRS. 0.73 ' ( TP PEAKCFS 0.64841 L 0. 1 599 READY... YES I CFS TOL. 0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 ' BASIN A,PRE-CONDITION,100YR-24HR T HYDROGRAPH.FILE......... SCS_256 FILE.... BAPRE100 AL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... 1.6 INPUT ID 110899820 GHTED SCS CURVE NUMBER.... 39.0 TYPE.... RNF0002 TIAL ABSTRACTION FACTOR... 4.2 RUN, HRS..28 4 ..-- E OF CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.73 DT, HRS. 0.1 DATA PTS 285 STORM... SCS_IIM DURATION 24.0 ' RAINFALL 12.0 EXCESS:. 3.2109215 ACREAGE. 1.6 ' TC, HRS. 0.73 K CFS 1.5273204 ' ACFT VOL. 29 READY... YES ' CFS TOL-0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 ' OFFSITE BASIN 1,PRE-CONDITION,25YR-24HR IT HYDROGRAPH'FILE......... SCS_256" FILE ..:. -OSBIPR25 TAL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... F 0.16 INPUT ID 110899839 WEIGHTED SCS CURVE NUMBER.... 72.19 TYPE.... RNF0002 &NITIAL ABSTRACTION-FACTOR ... 0.2 RUN, HRS 24.4 ME OF CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.05 DT, HRS. 0.1 DATA PTS 245 ' STORM... DURATION SCS_IIM 24.0 RAINFALL 9-.0 EXCESS.. 5.6055255 ACREAGE. 0.16 ' TC, HRS. 0.05 TP 12.0 ' K CFS ACFT V 0.836297 0. 69 READY... YES CFS TOL. 0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 1 O ??S-s -t ` r3 ??-fit.., ? OFFSITE BASIN 1,PRE- CONDITION,100YR-24HR JNIT HYDROGRAPH FILE......... SCS 256 FILE.... OSB1P100 OTAL DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES... _ 0.16 INPUT ID 110899853 WEIGHTED-SCS CURVE NUMBER.... 72.19 TYPE::.. RNFOO02 NITIAL ABSTRACTION FACTOR... 0.2 RUN, HRS 24.4 IME OF CONCENTRATION, HOURS. 0.05 DT, HRS. 0.1 ' ' DATA PTS 24 5 ' STORM... DURATION SCS_IIM 24.0 RAINFALL 12.0 ' EXCESS.. ACREAGE. 8.3611937 0.16 TC, HRS. 0.05 T S PEAZ, CFS- 1_ 436582 ' ACFT VO 11143 READY... YES ' CFS TOL. 0.001 HRS TOL. 0.01 © F? Sz--? C3 P. 5-Z-6--3 1 % Q o'4 h PZ Q O ?7- I-- "D N v H H 0 I I .- !_1 1 ? i f t L l 1 l } ?_ _ + 1._ ' 1 rE v a ' t 1 - 1 - _ !- ' L f ? ._ 1y _L 1. 1 ?I 1 ?L r ..i _ ? L. 1 t 1 •- - ,.. ; ,. . _ ? _. L 1_ y 1 L1i. 1.1. ,.l . ? ? 1 4 i } } ... 1 I. t I , { - .._ i ?' y . 1 f i 11 } 1- 1 f { 1 I t. .LL 1 _ _:- l F` 1 I i ?, 1_ i .L ? _,"•il l-t- 1}.. A :.L , ! 11 iI L i11. - _ 1 t 1 } , I. J. I t L I t _ 1 t ? ? : L 1 11 L -Ai - . 1 1.i _ + : ? .LJ_1 1 _ : t _ L 1 . -- - E ? 4 . _ - L . ti Ti. -I L -44- J ?.. , 1 A L l _-1 I Ll ? J1 J .J ,.-1---. J rL. { 1 , L L ql- ( 7 1_ t- 1 1 J 1 I 1 1 L A 1 -1 I-' 4-4 f - -- 1 t :. , _... ... I , .._ _ ___ t t 44- . . . . . . . tt: . _ -? - _ 1 1 _. .. . r -_ - -. .. .. :. __ 7: : ..-? .:: . .. i::. ?:.. .:. -. .I. - __ .. : I .- . _ .. .. 17 ... .. .... L L y 1 - } - i f' l , L 7 j - - - f J 9 J D r ' P. O S? 0 A 1A T ? P4 ??-?,/ ?ham 1s; T 1 r ' T CLEARWATER COURTYARD PEER JOB # 03-1460 DETERMINE TIME TO PERCOLATE WATER QUALITY VOLUME DETENTION POND SIDE-DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS (Using Darcy's Law for flow through porous materials) ASSUMED UNDER-DRAIN LENGTH= 23.00 Ft. "K" VALUE = 3.5 Ft/Hr. UNDERDRAIN PIPE DIAMETER = 0.33 Ft. WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 2,904.00 CF. WATER QUALITY EL = 42.37 Ft. WATER STORAGE STARTING EL = 42.00 Ft. UNDERDRAIN UPPER INV = 41.00 Ft. UNDERDRAIN LOWER INV = 41.00 Ft. WIDTH OF FILTER SAND = 2.00 Ft. AVG. FLOW WIDTH AREA h delta h V delta V LENGTH OF OF AVG. delta T SUM T E TOTAL INCR. TOTAL INCR. THRU HYD. FILTER FILTER FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL ELEV HEAD HEAD VOLUME VOLUME FILTER GRADE SAND SAND Q=KiA 01+Q2l2 TIME TIME (NGVD) (Ft.) (Ft.) (CF.) (CF.) (Ft.) i=h/l (Ft.) (SF.) (CF/h) (CF/h) (hrs) (hrs) 42.370 1.205 2,904.000 2.000 0.6025 2.000 46.000 97.002 0.000 0.370 2,904.000 82.110 35.367 42.000 0.835 0.000 2.000 0.4175 2.000 46.000 67.218 35.367 FACTOR OF SAFETY =72 HRS/TOTAL TIME = 2.00 AVERAGE UNDERDRAIN INV = 41 + 41.00 /2 = 41.000 - hl = 42.37 41.00 - 0.165 = 1.205 h2 = 42.00 41.00 0.165 = - 0.835 TOTAL TIME REQUIRED TO FILTER WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 35.36719 FIGU RE 13' POSTTI.BRN Report Covering C:\DBRN3\03-1460.WBS\POSTTI.BRN Created.: Wed Mar 30 06:50:23 2005 Revised.: Mon Apr 11 17:05:44 2005 Executed: Mon Apr 11 17:06:13 2005 Project Run Converged. Prepared By i PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 9-800 4TH ST. N_.•, SUITE..308 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA Project- Contains -7 -Paths Project Contains 7 Nodes. Project Contains 0 Sgnls. --------------------------------------------------- Path Up Stream Node Name (Down Stream Node NamelPath Type ----+---------------------+------- -----+--------- 0 BASIN A DETENTION POND A (DIRECT 1 OFFSITE BASIN 1- GRATE INLET A DIRECT 2 DETENTION POND A OUTFALL STRUCTURE ORIFICE 3 DETENTION POND A OUTFALL STRUCTURE RECT WEIR 4 OUTFALL STRUCTURE GRATE .INLET.. A__ PIPE 5 GRATE INLET A DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE PIPE 6 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE DRUID ROAD ORIFICE ------------------------------------------------------- ------ ---------------------------------- Nodel Name Node Type ----+---------------------+--------- 0 BASIN A SUBAREA 1 DETENTION POND A POND 2 OFFSITE BASIN 1 SUBAREA 3 OUTFALL STRUCTURE JUNCTION 4 DRUID ROAD STAGING 5 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE JUNCTION 6 ,GRATE INLET A JUNCTION -------------------------------------- --------------------------- Node Name Node T e Min El. at Hr. Max E1. at r. +---------------- 0 BASIN A SUBAREA' 45.00 0:0 45•.00 0.0 1 DETENTION POND A POND 42.00 0.0 44.76 14.3 2 OFFSITE BASIN 1 SUBAREA 45.00 0.0 45.00 0.0 3 OUTFALL STRUCTURE JUNCTION 3 7'.- S0` 0.0 . 49'.3,3 12.5 --------------------------------------------- ------- Elevations in Feet,-Nodes-marked with an-'*'-have-Flooded. ------------- _---------------------------------------------------------- Network Summary (US Std); Page 1 of 2 FIGURE 14 ?v..- L-t Vt.- S-r?mt-% POSTTI.BRN ------ -------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- Nodel Name Node TypelMin E1. at Hr.jMax E1. at Hr_ ----+-------------------- - -+---------+--------------+------------ - ' 4 DRUID ROAD STAGING 40.00 0.0 40.00' 0.0 5 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE JUNCTION 36.50 0.0 40.32 12.5 6 GRATE INLET A JUNCTION ---- 37.41 ---------- 0.0 40.33 12.5 - -------------------- --------- Elevations in Feet, ------- Nodes marked with an have Flooded. Node Name I Maximum CFS Inflow I Maximum CFS Outflow ------- -------------+ ------;.--- ------------ 0 BASIN A 6.61 @ 12.20 Hours 6.61 @ 12.20 Hours 1 DETENTION POND A 6.61 @ 12.20 Hours 0.63 @ 24.00 Hours 2 OFFSITE BASIN-1 0'.32-@- 12.50 Hours 0.32 @ 12.50 Hours 3 OUTFALL STRUCTURE 0.63 @ 24.00 Hours 0.64 @ 23.80 Hours ' 4 DRUID ROAD C(-5q-)@ 12.50 Hours 0.00 @ 0.00 Hours 5 DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE 0. @ 12.50 Hours 0.94 @• 12.50 Hours 6 GRATE INLET A 0.95 @ 12.50 Hours 1.44 @ 11.30 Hours ------ ------- 1 _______ _ --------------------- 1 ----------------------------------------------------- __________ Network Summary (US Std); Page 2 of 2 POSTTI.BRN Report Covering C:\DBRN3\03-1460.WBS\POSTTI.BRN Created.: Wed Mar 30 06:50:23 2005 Revised-.: Mon Apr 11 17:05:44 2005 Executed: Mon Apr 11 17:06:13 2005 Project Run Converged. Prepared By PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 9800 4TH ST. N., SUITE 308 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA ---------------------------- Path 000 ID 110900056 Type DIRECT US Std -------------------------- 00 DIRECT:.._---------- ' 01 02 ' 03 04 05 06 ' 07 08 . 09 10 ' 11 12 ' 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE YES 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft ' 18 --- Max TW.. 45.000 Ft ------------------------- ' -L? (? -- L? N?? ST` n ' ------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ DataDump (US Std) ; Page .1 of 8 ' FIGURE 15 POSTTI.BRN ---------------------------- Path 001 ID 1109000621 ' ---------- Type-DIRECT US Std 00 DIRECT..---------- 01 02 03 04 ' 05 06 07 08 ' 09 10 ' 11 12 13 14 15. HW. PE./ KE..NO _M 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. ------------ 45..000 ----------- Ft, ----- ' ------------ Path 002 ID ----------- 1112626605 ----- Type ORIFICE US ------------- Std ---- ' -- 00 ------- Crest El 45.000 Ft 01 Length.. 3.080 Ft 02 Width... 2.000 Ft 03 Shape... RECTANGLE ' 04 Pct Open . _78.280,. Pct 05 Weir C.. 3.200 06 Orfc C.. 0.600 ' 07 Handle.. Name 08 -------- ----------- ---- 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 HW PE/KE YES 16 TW PE/KE NO ' 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW_.. -- 4-5.000- ----------- „ Ft ----- ---------- _ -------------------------- ---- - DataDump (US Std); Page 2 of 8 1 POSTTI.BRN - ---------------------- ----- Path 003 ID 1112638712 ' --- --US Type-RECT-WEIR -Std 00 Crest El 42.300 Ft ' 01 Width... 0.390 02 Weir C.. 3.200 Ft 03 Num Ends 2 04 ------------------- ---- 05 Breadth. Ft 06 08 09 10 11 12 13' 14 15 HW PE/KE YES 16 TW PE/KE NO 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft ' 18 MaxTW4000- ---------------------- Ft ----- - --- Pat ------------------------ h 004 ID 1112129394 Typ e PIPE US Std ------------------ 00 --- Length.. 11.0 Ft ------ 01 Mann N.. 0.009 02 Rise.... 1.500 Ft ' 03 04 Span.... 1.500 Ft Inlet------------------ 05 Invert.. 37.500 Ft ' 06 07 Ent Ke.. 0.200 Outlet----------------- 08 Invert.. 37.410 Ft 09 Ent Ke.. 0.200 10 ----------------------- ' 11 BW Steps 0 12 ----------------------- 13 14 15 HW PE/KE NO ' 16 17 TW PE/KE NO Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. 45.000 Ft ----------------- --- -------- ---- ------------------------ - DataDump (US Std); Page 3 of 8 POSTTI.BRN ------------- ---------- ----- Path 005 ID 1113253544 ' --- Type-PIPE US ------- Std - 00 Length.. 121.0 Ft 01 Mann N.. 02 Rise.... 0.009 1.500 Ft 03 Span.... 1.500 Ft 04 Inlet ---- ---------- ---- ' 05 Invert.. 37.410 Ft 06 Ent Ke.. 0.200 07 Outlet --- ---------- ---- ' 08 Invert.. 09 Ent Ke.. 36.500 0.200 Ft 10 --------- ---------- ---- ---Steps 11 12 --------- 0 ---------- ---- 13 14 ' 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW - PE/KE-- NO- 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft ' 18 Max TW.. ------------- 45000 ---------- Ft ----- ------------- Path 006 ID ---------- 1112131763 ----- Type ORIFICE US Std ------------- ------------ 00 Crest El - 40.270 Ft 01 Length.. 4.080 Ft 02 Width.... - 3..0.810.. Ft.- 03 Shape... 04 Pct Open RECTANGLE 78.280 Pct 05 Weir C.. 3.200- - 06 Orfc C 0.600 .. ' 07 Name Handle 08 -- 09 ' 10 11 12 13 ' 14 15 HW PE/KE NO 16 TW PE/KE NO ' 17 Max HW.. 45.000 Ft 18 Max TW.. 45.000 Ft - - - ------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ -------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 4 of 8 0 POSTTI_BRN -------------- Node-000 Name ---------- BASIN-A ------------------- Input# ----------- 1112129335 Type SUBAREA -------- ------------------- US Std ---------- --- 00 ---------- Subarea.. -- BAPOS25 File Flood E1. 45.00 Ft 01 File ID#. 1113070685 -------------- ---------- 02 Alt Type. RNF0002 03 Run Time. 25.600 Hrs 04 Delta T.. 0.100 Hrs 05 NumData.. 257 Pts 06 Storm.... SCS_IIM File 07 Duration. 24.000 Hrs 08 Rainfall. 9.000 In 09 Excess... 7.278 In 10 Area..... 1.600 Ac 11 TC ........ 0 .2 5 0- Hrs 12 TP....... 12.200 Hrs 13 Peak Flow 6.615 CFS 14 Volume ... 0. 970"-" AcFt ' 15 Executed. YES 16 -------------------- ----+-------------- ---------- 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage T0. Ft 18 --- X Coord.. ----------- ---------- Ft IY Coord.. ------------------- Ft ----------- - --- Nod ---------- e 001 Name ----------------------------- DETENTION POND A.. Input# ----------- 1113071124 Typ e POND --------- --------------- US Std ---------- --- 00 ---------- Top E1... ----- 45.000 Ft Top Area. 0.260 Ac 01 El....... Ft Area..... Ac 02 E1....... Ft Area..... Ac 03 El....... Ft Area..... Ac 04 El....... Ft Area..... Ac 05 E1....... Ft Area..... Ac 06 E1....... Ft Area..... Ac 07 El....... Ft Area..... Ac 08 El....... Ft Area..... Ac 09 El....... Ft Area..... Ac 10 Bot El... 42.000 Ft Bot Area. 0.170 Ac 11 ------------------------ +-------------- ---------- 12 Top Perim Ft Side %Per Pct 13 Mid Perim Ft Base %Per Pct 14 Bot Perim Ft 15 16 -------- ---------- 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage T0. 4 2.000 Ft 18 --- X Coord.. ----------- Ft -------------- Y Coord.. -------------- Ft --------- DataDump (US Std); Page 5 of 8 POSTTI.BRN - --- ---------- --------------- -------------- ----------- Node 002 Name OFFSITE BASIN 1 Input# 1113070868 ' Type SUBAREA -- --------------- -------------- -US-Std -------- --- 00 -------- Subarea.. OSBlPR25 File Flood El. - 45.00 Ft 01 02 File ID#. Alt Type. 1112127135 RNF0002 ------------- - ---------- 03 Run Time. 28.200 Hrs. 04 Delta T.. 0.100 Hrs ' 05 NumData.. 283 Pts 06 Storm.... SCS I-IM File 07 Duration. 24.000 Hrs ' 08 09 Rainfall. Excess... 9.000 In 5.606 In 10 Area..... 0.160 Ac ' 11 12 TC....... TP....... 0.690 Hrs 12.500 Hrs 13 Peak Flow 0.319 CFS 14 Volume... 0.075 AcFt ' 15 Executed. YES 16 ---------- -------------- --------------- ---------- 17 Base Flow 0....OQ. CFS-.. .Stage,.TO.. . .. . Ft . 18 --- X Coord.. ----------- Ft -------------- Y Coord.. --------------- Ft ----------- - --- Nod -------------------------------------------------- e 003 Name OUTFALL STRUCTURE Input# 1112123001 Typ e JUNCTION US Std -------------------------------------- ' --- 00 ----------- FloodEl45000 Ft 01 ------------------------ 02 03 04 05 ' 06 07 08 09 ' 10 11 12 13 ' 14 15 16 ------------------------+------------------------ ' 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage T0. Ft 18 X Coord.. Ft Y Coord.. ----------------------- --- --------------- ------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std} ; Page- 6 of 8 - .. . . r1 I 1 POSTTI.BRN -------------- Node 004 Name -------------- DRUID ROAD ------- --------- Input# ---------- 1112123940 Type STAGING -------- ------- --------- US Std --------- --- 00 ---------- Flood El. ------ 45.000 Ft IPE to KE. NO 01 ------------------------+------------------------ 02 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 03 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 04 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 05 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 06 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 07 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 08 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 09 Time..... Hrs Stage -El. Ft 10 Time..... Hrs Stage E1. Ft 11 Time..... Hrs Stage El. Ft 12 Time..... Hrs_ Stage .Elo__ Ft 13 ---------- -------------- ------------------------- 14 15 f 16 ---------- -------------- +------------------------ 17 Base Flow CFS Stage T0. 40.000 Ft 18 --- X Coord.. ----------- Ft -------------- ly-Coord.. --------------- Ft ----------- ------------------------------------------------------ Node 005 Name DRUID ROAD STRUCTURE Input# 1112123948 d Type JUNCTION US St ------------------------------------ ' ---------------- Ft 000 45 00 FloodEl - - - _ -- - - _ 0-1 - 02 03 04 05 ' 06 07 08 09 ' 10 11 12 13 ' 14 15 16 -------------- 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS (Stage T0. Ft Ft 18 X Coord.. Ft Y Coord.. --------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- ---- ------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 7 of 8 POSTTI.BRN ----------------------------------------------------- Node 006 Name GRATE INLET A Input# 1112125851 Type JUNCTION US StdI 00 Flood El. 45.000 Ft 01 ------------------------ 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 16 ------------------------------------------------- 17 Base Flow 0.00 CFS Stage T0. Ft 18 X•- Coord .. Ft Y Coord... Ft- ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DataDump (US Std); Page 8 of 8 1 1 1 1 1 Outlet P-1 ? DS #1 1 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basinl.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 05/06/05 04:05:58 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FIGURE 16 Project Engineer. PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 1 Detailed Report for EhrtW. Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 2.37 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 2.37 cfs 1 Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 7.27 in/hr Upstream CA 0.32 acres ' Flow Times Description Description ' System Flow Time 15.23 min Upstream Flow Time 15.23 min ' Elevations Description Description ' HGL In Ground Elevation 41.00 It 45.00 ft HGL Out Rim Elevation 41.00 ft 45.00 ft ' Other Properties Description Description ' X Velocity -37.12 ft 4.50 ft/s y Headloss 43.20 ft 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+00 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestadlstmc\03-1460\basinl.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 05/06/05 04:05:36 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: PEER StormCAD 0.0 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-1 ' Section Material: Concrete Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 15 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient Length Constructed Slope ' Upstream Flow Time Pipe Flow Time System Flow Time. 2.38 cis Capacity 5.81 cfs 0.013 Hydraulic Drop 0.53 ft 58.00 It Energy Slope 0.007875 Wit 0.008103 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 3.94 ft/s 15.00 min Average Velocity 4.22 ft/s 0.23 min Downstream Velocity 4.50 ft/s 15.23 min Grade Elevations ' Messages: Profile: Supercritical, upstream critical depth with full transition to downstream normal depth. Profile: Supercritical flow. Profile: Steep channel slope. ' Profile: Upstream critical depth assumed. 7 Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.22 45.00 42.47 2.53 0.62 41.84 42.08 Downstream 40.75 45.00 42.00 3.00 0.56 41.31 41.62 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basinl.stm PROFESSIONACENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06105 04:04:47 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for DS #1 ' Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.34 0.95 Total 0.34 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.34 acres Inlet C 0.95 Inlet CA 0.32 acres Time of Concentration 15.00 min Inlet Intensity 7.30 in/hr Inlet Discharge 2.38 cfs Flo s w Description Description ' Total Discharge 2.38 cfs Known Flow ' 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 2.38 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs 1 Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 7.30 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.32 acres Inlet CA 0.32 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres ' Flow Times D i i Description pt on escr System Flow Time 15.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min ' Inlet TC 15.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ' ti D i Description on escr p HGL In 41.84 ft HGL Out 41.84 ft ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft Other Properties ' i D ti Description p on escr x 8.32 ft y 43.20 ft Velocity 3.94 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss.Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+58 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD . d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basinl.stm PROFE SSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 05/06105 04:05:25 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 ON ' BOX 2 !?- JUNCTI 9 -? Outlet P-3 ' N DS #7 R-5 R-3 R_ R - 4 J JUNCTION BOX 1( PR - P-27 I P-1 P-28 N DS #5 P-30 P-2 J-9 P-2 . P-1 P-17 P-29 2 nR-1 P-15 1? NDS #4 P-161 DS #2 P-6 P-8 P-10 P-12 P-14 P-13 J-8 J-7 J-6 J-5 J-4 J-3 J:,oj=tTi1I'--C.1eaa18r rwTHE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER Vradstm\03-1460?basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 5/06/05 05:57:02 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Outlet Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 3.36 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 3.36 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 8.00 in/hr Upstream CA 0.42 acres ' Flow Times Description Description ' System Flow Time 12.02 min Upstream Flow Time 12.02 min ' Elevations Description Description HGL In 41.00 ft HGL Out 41.00 It ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft ' Other Properties Description Description ' X Velocity -67.54 It 2.75 ft/s Y Headlow - .. ,. 89.87 It 0.00 ft. . Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+00 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PR OFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05'06:03:38 PM Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for JUNCTION BOX 2 Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 3.37 cis Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cis Total Watershed (CIA) 3.37 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 8.03 in/hr Upstream CA 0.42 acres Total CA 0.42 acres Flow Times ' Description Description System Flow Time 11.86 min Upstream Flow Time 11.86 min 1 Elevations Description Description ' HGL In 41.07 ft HGL Out 41.07 ft Ground Elevation 44.68 It Rim Elevation " 44.68 It ' Other Properties . Description Description ' X -84.93 ft y 89.74 ft Velocity 2.77 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+26 ft ' External Flow 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05106/05 06:03:18 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-3 ' Section Material: Concrete Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 15 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient Length Constructed Slope ' Upstream Flow Time Pipe Flow Time System Flow Time 3.39 Cfs Capacity 4.04 cfs 0.013 Hydraulic Drop 0.13 ft 46.00 ft Energy Slope - 0.002760 Wit 0.003913 fttft Upstream Velocity 2.77 ft/s 11.58 min Average Velocity 2.77 ft/s 0.28 min DownstreamVe7oitity°' 2.77 ftfs 11.86 min 1 Grade Elevations Location Invert - Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 39.74 44.89 40.99 3.90 1.46 41.20 41.32 Downstream 39.56 . 44.68 40.81 _ 3.87 ..w .. 1.51 .. , .. 41.07 41._19 Messages: Profile: Pressure Flow Information: Surcharged condition In u J ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestadlstmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:03:10 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for JUNCTION BOX 1 Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 3.39 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 3.39 cfs ' Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 8.08 in/hr Upstream CA 0.42 acres Total CA 0.42 acres Flow Times ' Description Description System Flow Time 11.58 min Upstream Flow Time 11.58 min ' Elevations Description Description HGL In 41.20 ft HGL Out 41.20 It Ground Elevation 44.89 -ft Rim Elevation.. 44.89 ft i Other Properties - Description Description ' X -84.86 ft y 49.34 It Velocity 2.79 ft/s Headloss 0.00 It Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+72 It External Flow .. 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:03:02 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-2 Section Material: Concrete Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 15 inch Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 3.42 cfs Capacity 4.18 cfs ' Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Hydraulic Drop 0.17 ft Length 62.00 ft Energy Slope 0.002811 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.004194 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.79 ft/s ' Upstream Flow Time 11.21 min Average Velocity 2.79 ft/s Pipe Flow Time 0.37 min Downstream Velocity 2.79 f is System Flow Time 11.58 min Grade Elevations Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft} _ . (ft) . . (k _ (ft) . . Upstream 40.00 45.00 41.25 3.75 1.37 41.37 41.49 Downstream 39.74 44.89 40.99 3.90 1.46 41.20 41.32 ' Messages: Profile: Pressure Flow Information: Surcharged condition ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:02:54 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for DS #2 ' Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.25 0.95 Total 0.25 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.25 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.24 acres Time of Concentration 10.00 min Inlet Intensity 8.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 2.01 cfs ' Flows - Description Description Total Discharge' 3.42 cls- Known Flow 0.00 cis Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 3.42 cfs Carryover 0.00 cis Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 8.16 in/hr Upstream CA 0.18 acres Total CA 0.42 acres Inlet CA 0.24 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres ' Flow Times - - • • -. - D i ti ' Description escr p on System Flow Time 11.21 min Upstream Flow Time 11.21 min ' Inlet TC 10.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations tion Descri Description p HGL In 41.37 ft HGL Out 41.37 ft ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft Other Properties ' D ti i Description on escr p x -84.80 ft Y 4.51 ft Velocity 3.91 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 1+34 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs I1 L ' Project Title. Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:02:46 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06706 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-6 Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 12 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 1.47 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 3.15 cfs 0.09 ft Length 13.00 ft Energy Slope 0.004325 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.004615 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 3.62 ft/s - Upstream Flow Time 11.16 min Average Velocity 3.77 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.06 min Downstream Velocity 3.91 f fs System Flow Time 11.21 min Grade Elevations Messages: Profile: Supercritical flow. Profile: Supercritical upstream critical depth with partial transition to downstream normal depth. ' Profile: Steep channel slope. r Profile: Upstream critical depth assumed. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.31 45.00 42.31 2.69 0.51 41.82 42.03 Downstream 41.25 45.00 42.25 2.75 0.48 41.73 41.97 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestadlstmc\03-14601basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:02:38 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for J-8 Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 1.47 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 1.47 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity, 8.17 in/hr Upstream CA 0.18 acres Total CA 0.18 acres Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 11.16 min Upstream Flow Time 11.16 min ' Elevations Description Description ' HGL In 41.82 ft HGL Out 41.82 ft Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft ' Other Properties Description Description ' X -57.77 ft y 4.42 ft Velocity 2.86 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 1+47 ft ' External Flow 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES Project Engineer. PEER StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:02:30 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-8 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 12 inch Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 1.17 cfs Capacity 3.32 cfs - ' Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.08 ft Length 28.00 It Energy Slope 0.004709 ft1ft Constructed Slope 0.005146 Wit Upstream Velocity 3.35 ftfs - - - Upstream Flow Time 11.01 min Average Velocity 3.11 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.15 min Downstream Velocity 2.86 ft/s System Flow Time 11.16 min Elevations G d .. ra e ' Location Invert (ft) Ground (ft) Crown (ft) Cover (ft) Depth (ft) HGL (ft) EGL (ft) Upstream 41.45 45.27 42.45 2.82 0.45 41.91 42.08 Downstream 41.31 45.00 42.31 2.69 0.51 41.82 41.95 ' Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. t 1 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:02:21 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 ' Flows Description Total Discharge Upstream Additional + Carryover Watershed Data Description .17 cfs 0.00 cfs Detailed Report for J-7 Description Known Flow Total Watershed 'CIA), Description .00 cfs 1.17 cfs System Intensity 8.20 in/hr . Upstream CA - 0.14 acres - Total CA 0.14 acres Flow Times ' Description Description System Flow Time 11.01 min Upstream Flow Time 11.01 min ' Elevations Description Description ' HGL In 41.91 ft HGL Out 41.91 ft Ground Elevation 45.27 ft Rim Elevation 45.27 It Other Properties Description Description ' X -25.39 ft y 4.38 ft Velocity 3.86 ft/s Headloss" 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 1+75 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs t ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:02:14 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-10 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 10 inch Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.93 cfs Capacity 2.35 cis Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.22 ft Length 25.00 ft Energy Slope 0.006272 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.006800 ftht Upstream Velocity 3.30 ft/s ' Upstream Flow Time 10.89 min Average Velocity 3.58 ft1s Pipe Flow Time 0.12 min Downstream Velocity 3.86 f fs ' System Flow Time 11.01 min I Grade Elevations. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.70 45.27 42.53 2.74 0.43 42.13 42.30 Downstream 41.53 45.27 42.36 2.91 0.38 41.91 42.14 ' Messages: Profile: Supercritical, upstream critical depth with full transition to downstream normal depth. Profile: Supercritical flow. ' Profile: Tailwater submerges exit flow. Profile: Steep channel slope. Profile: Upstream critical depth assumed. i Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:XhaestadXstmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05106/05 06:02:05 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for J-6 Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.93 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.93 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 8.22 in/hr Upstream CA 0.11 acres Total CA 0.11 acres Flow Times ' Description Description System Flow Time 10.89 min Upstream Flow Time 10.89 min ' Elevations Description Description HGL In 42.13 ft HGL Out 42.13 ft Ground Elevation 45.27 ft Rim Elevation 45.27 It ' Other Properties Description Description ' X 1.29 It Y 4.38 ft Velocity 2.48 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+00 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs ' ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:Xhaestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGrNEERtNG RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06105 06:01:56 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Reportfor Pipe P4Z . ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape:-Circular . . Section Size: 10 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.70 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 2.38 cfs 0.15 ft Length 30.00 ft Energy Slope 0.006511 fUft Constructed Slope 0.007000 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 3.01 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 10.71 min. Average Velocity 2-74 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.18 min Downstream Velocity 2.48 ft/s System Flow Time 10.89 min Grade Elevations Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.91 45.58 42.74 2.84 0.37 42.28 42.42 Downstream 41.70 45.27 42.53 2.74 0.43 42.13 42.22 Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, crtttcat depth assumed-upstrearrr. -' 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:Xhaestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES `05/06/05 06.01:47 PM .... ' Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brooksid.-Raad' Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: PEER StormCAD 0.0 Page 1 of 1 ' Flows Description Detailed Report for J-5 Description Total Discharge . 0.70 cfs... Known Flow 0.00 ds Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.70 cfs 1 Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 8.26 in/hr Upstream CA 0.08 acres Total CA 0.08 acres Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 10.71 min Upstream Flow Time 10.71 min Elevations Description Description HGL In 42.28 It HGL Out 42.28 ft Ground Elevation 45.58 It Rim Elevation 45.58 ft Other Properties Description Description ' X 25.19 ft y 4.36 ft Velocity 2.18 fits Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+30 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05'06:01:36 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-14 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 8 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.43 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 1.30 cfs 0.11 ft Length 25.00 ft Energy Slope 0.006075 Wit Constructed Slope 0.006800 Wit Upstream Velocity 2.75 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 10.54 min Average Velocity 2.46 ft/s Pipe Flow Time 0.17 min Downstream Velocity 2.18 ft/s System Flow Time 10.71 min El ti G d ons ra eva e Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. J U LJ u Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) . Eft) . (ft) - (ft) . (ft) (ft) Eft) Upstream 42.08 45.58 42.75 2.83 0.31 42.39 42.50 Downstream 41.91 45.58 42.58 3.00 0.37 42.28 42.35 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:01:27 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for J,4 Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.43 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.43 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 8.29 in/hr Upstream CA 0.05 acres Total CA 0.05 acres Flow Times ' Description Description System Flow Time 10.54 min Upstream Flow Time 10.54 min Elevations Description Description HGL In 42.39 ft HGL Out 42.39 ft Ground Elevation 45.58 ft Rim Elevation 45.58 ft ' Other Properties Description Description ' X 51.37 It y 4.36 ft Velocity - - - 2.14 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+55 it Extemal Flow 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StonnCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:01:18 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-13 ' Section Material- PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.19 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 0.62 cfs 0.13 ft Length 30.00 ft Energy Slope 0.006041 Wit Constructed Slope 0.007333 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.32 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 10.28 min Average Velocity 1.93 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.26 min Downstream Velocity 1.54 ft/s System Flow Time 10.54 min ' Grade Elevations Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. 7 Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 42.30 45.90 42.80 3.10 0.22 42.57 42:60 Downstream 42.08 45.58 42.58 3.00 0.31 42.39 42.42. Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:thaestad\stmct03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL EMGINEERING RE60URCES - - StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:01:10 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for J-3 1 Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 0.19 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.19 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 8.34 in/hr Upstream CA 0.02 acres Total CA 0.02 acres i Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 10.28' min Upstream Flow-Mime " 10.28 "min ' Elevations - Description Description HGL In 42.52 It HGL Out 42.52 ft Ground Elevation 45.90 ft Rim Elevation 45.90 It ' Other Properties Description Description- X 75.96 It y 4.34 It Velocity 2.34 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+85 ft ' External Flow 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestadlstmc\03-1460\1>asin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES Project Engineer: PEER - StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:01:01 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-16 ' Section Materiak PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge . Mannings Coefficient Length Constructed Slope Upstream Flow Time ' Pipe Flow Time System Flow Time 0.19 cfs Capacity 0.52 cfs 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.20 ft 39.00 ft Energy Slope 0.005128 ft/ft 0.005128 Wit Upstream Velocity 2.33 ft/s 10.00 min Average Velocity 2.33 ft/s 0.28 min Downstream Velocity 2.34 ft/s 10.28 min Grade Elevations Messages. Profile: Supercritical, upstream critical depth with full transition to downstream normal depth. Profile: Supercritical flow. Profile: Tailwater submerges exit flow. Profile: Steep channel slope. Profile: Upstream critical depth assumed. n Ll 17 u Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 42.50 45.00 43.00 2.00 0.22 42.72 42.81" Downstream 42.30 45.90 42.80 3.10 0.22 42.52 42.61 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER ' d:Xhaestad%stmct03-146Otbasin2.stm - PROFESSIONAL ENEINEE+?! -RESOURCES--- StorrnCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:00:51 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for NDS #4 ' Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.02 0.20 Total 0.02 0.20 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.02 acres Inlet C 0.20 ' Inlet CA 0.4e-2 acres Time of Concentration 10.00 min Inlet Intensity 8.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge. 0.03 cfs ' Flows Description Description ' Total Discharge- 0.19. cfs KnowA Flour-. 0.00 _ cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfS Total Watershed (CIA) 0.19 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 8.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.02 acres Total CA 0.02 acres Inlet CA 0.4e-2 acres- External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times ' D i ti Description on . escr p , System Flow Time 10.00 min Upstream Flow Time 5.04 min Inlet TC 10.00 min External TC 0.00 min a Elevations - ' i D ti Description on escr p HGL In 42.72 ft HGL Out 42.72 ft Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft ' Other Properties ' D i ti Description on p escr x 74.95 ft Y 31.05 ft Velocity 2.44 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 3+24 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:00:43 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-15 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.18 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 0.56 cfs 0.04 ft Length 5.00 ft Energy Slope 0.005756 It/it.. Constructed Slope 0.006000 Wit Upstream Velocity 2.27 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 2.36 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.04 min Downstream Velocity 2:44 ft/s, System Flow Time 5.04 min ' Grade Elevations I Messages: Profile: Tailwater submerges exit flow. Profile: Supemriticalflow. Profile: Supercritical upstream critical depth with partial transition to downstream normal depth. ' Profile: Steep channel slope. Profile: Upstream critical depth assumed. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft).. (ft) (ft) (ft) . Of) .. (ft) (ft) ... . Upstream 42.55 45.75 43.05 2.70 0.21 42.76 42.84 Downstream 42.52 45.00 43.02 1.98 0.20 42.72 42.81 I Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:00:32 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for R -1 ' Watershed Information Area C ' (acres) 0.02 0.95 Total 0.02 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.02 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.02 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.18 cfs Flows Description Description ' Total Discharge 0.18 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional.+.Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.18 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.02 acres Inlet CA 0.02 acres Extemal.CA 0.00 acres Flow Times ' D ri ti Description esc p on System Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min--. ' Inlet TC 5.00 min Extemal TC 0.00 min Elevations ' i ti i ti D p on Descr escr p on HGL In 42.76 ft HGL Out 42.76 ft Ground Elevation 45.75 It Rim Elevation 45.75 ft ' Other Properties ' D i ti Description p on escr x 74.69 It Y 55.54 It Velocity 2.27 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 3+29 It Extemal Flow 0.00 CfS ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 05/06/05 b6:002ZPM • - Haestad Methods, Inc.-- 3713rooksideReed--Water6wy, CT-06708 - (2W,j-7564666- Project Engineer. PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report-for Pipe P-17 Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.27 cfs Capacity 0.55 cfs Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.23 ft Length 47.00 ft Energy Slope 0.005509 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005745 Wit Upstream Velocity 2.59 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 2.37 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.33 min Downstream Velocity 2.14 ft/s System Flow Time 5.33 min El G d ti ons ra eva e Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. '1 E I 1 Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) . (ft) (ft) Upstream- 42.35 45.72 42:85 u 2.87 . _ ..0.26 -- 42.61 .. , . 42.72 Downstream 42.08 45.58 42.58 3.00 0.31 42.39 42.46 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d \haestad\stmc?1460\basin2.stm . P..ROFESSIONALENGINEERNG_RESOURCES StortnCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:03:59 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for R - 2 .. / Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.03 0.95 Total 0.03 0.95 Rational Formula ' Inlet Drainage Area 0.03 acres Inlet C 0.95 Inlet CA 0.03 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.27 cfs ' Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.27 cfs Known Flow 0.00 crs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.27 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs ' Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.03 acres Inlet CA 0.03 acres External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min ' Elevations Description Description HGL In 42.61 ft HGL Out 42.61 ft Ground Elevation 45.72 It Rim Elevation 45.72 It Other Properties ' D i ti D i ti p on escr p on escr X 50.17 It Y 52.16 ft ' Velocity 2.59 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 3+02 ft External Flow. 0.00 cfs Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGIRIEERtNG RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:03:50 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-19 ' Section Material: PVC- Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch 1 Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.28 cf8 Capacity 0.55 cfs ' Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.04 ft Length 25.00 It Energy Slope 0.003722 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005600 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.61 f is t Upstream Flow Time 10.00 min Average Velocity 2.19 f is Pipe Flow Time 0.19 min Downstream Velocity 1.77 f fs System Flow Time 10.19 min Grade Elevations ' Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. w Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 42.05 45.00 42.55 2.45 0.26 42.31 42.42 Downstream 41.91 45.58 42.41 3.17 0.37 42.28 42.33 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:04:48 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for NDS #5 ' Watershed Information Area C ' (acres) 0.02 0.20 Total 0.02 0.20 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.02 acres Inlet C 0.20 ' Inlet CA 0.4e-2 acres Time of Concentration 10.00 min Inlet Intensity 8.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.03 cfs ' Flows Description Description ' Total Discharge 0.28 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.28 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 8.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.03 acres Total CA 0.03 acres Inlet CA 0.4e-2 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres ' Flow Times D i ti Description p on escr System Flow Time 10.00 min Upstream Flow Time 5.09 min Inlet TC 10.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations i ti D Description p on escr HGL In 42.31 ft HGL Out 42.31 ft Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft Other Properties ' ti n D i Description escr p o X 24.52 ft Y 38.18 ft Velocity 2.56 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+55 ft Extemat Flow 0.00 cfs Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD . d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460%asin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 05/06/05'06:04:30 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-18 ' Section Material: Pvc Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.27 cfs Capacity 0.52 cfs Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.07 ft Length 14.00 ft Energy Slope 0.004997 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.59 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 2.58 ft /s Pipe Flow Time 0.09 min Downstream Velocity 2.56 ft/s System Flow Time 5.09 min ' n El ti G d ra eva o s e Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StorrnCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:04:20 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 42.12 45.75 42.62 3.13 0.26 42.38 42.49 Downstream 42.05 45.00 42.55 2.45 0.26 42.31 42.42 Detailed Report for R - 3 ' Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.03 0.95 Total 0.03 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.03 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.03 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.27 cfs ' Flows ' Description Total Discharge 0.27 cfs Description Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.27 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.40 inthr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA. 0.03 acres Inlet CA .. 0.03 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times D i i Description on escr pt System Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ti D i Description p on escr HGL In 42.38 ft HGL Out 42.38 ft Ground Elevation 45.75 ft Rim Elevation 45.75 ft Other Properties ' D i ti Description on escr p x 24.27 ft Y 53.21 ft Velocity 2.59 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+69 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:04:12 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-20 ' Section Material: PVC- Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.27 cfs Capacity 0.52 cfs Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.02 ft Length 32.00 ft Energy Slope 0.002065 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.34 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 1.92 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.28 min Downstream Velocity 1.51 fUs System Flow Time 5.28 min I Grade Elevations Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.86 45.90 42.36 3.54 0.28 42.14 42.23 Downstream 41.70 45.27 42.20 3.07 0.43 42.13 42.16 ' Messages: Profile: Steep (S1) profile, without hydraulic jump, hydraulic grade increases in downstream direction. 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERtNG?RESOURCES- StormCAD v1.0 05106/05 06:06:14 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for R - 4 ' tion W t h d I fo m a ers n r a e ' Area C (acres) 0.03 0.95 Total 0.03 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.03 acres Inlet C 0-95 ' Inlet CA 0.03 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.27 cfs ' Fl ows Description Description ' _ Total Discharge.- _ .. ... 0.27.-. cfs-. Known Flair 0A0 cfs. . . Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.27 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.03 acres Inlet CA-- 0.03 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times Description Description Systeril Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min ' Elevations i ti n D Description p escr o HGL In 42.14 ft HGL Out 42.14 ft Ground Elevation 45.90 ft Rim Elevation 45.90 ft ' Other Properties - D tion i Description p escr x 0.80 ft y 50.66 ft Velocity 2.34 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+32 It External Flow 0.00 cfs ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05106/05 06:06:06 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-30 Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.27 cfs Capacity 0.53 cfs Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.13 ft Length 47.00 ft Energy Slope 0.004106 ft/ft '. Constructed Slope 0.005319 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.59 ft(s ' Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 2.14 fVs Pipe Flow Time 0.37 min Downstream Velocity 1.69 ft/s System Flow Time 5.37 min Grade Elevations ' Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) . (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) .._. (ft) Upstream 41.78 46.00 42.28 3.72 0.26 42.04 42.15 Downstream 41.53 45.27 42.03 3.24 0.38 41.91 41.95 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project. Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 06:15:48 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for R - 5 t Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.03 0.95 Total 0.03 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.03 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.03 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.27 cfs Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.27 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.27 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.03 acres Inlet CA 0.03 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres ' Flow Times D ti n i Description p o escr System Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min ' Elevations tion D i Description escr p HGL In 42.04 ft HGL Out 42.04 ft ' Ground Elevation 46.00 ft Rim Elevation 46.00 ft Other Properties n D i ti Description escr p o x -26.16 ft y 54.23 ft Velocity 2.59 fUs Headloss 0.00 It ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+22 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs F ' Project Idle: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StorrnCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:15:40 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-29 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.36 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 0.52 cfs 0.06 ft Length 37.00 ft Energy Slope 0.002282 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005135 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.21 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.29 min Average Velocity 2.01 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.31 min Downstream Velocity 1.82 ft/s System Flow Time 5.59 min ' Grade Elevations a ' Messages: Profile: Subcritical flow. Profile: Mild channel slope. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.50 46.36 42.00 4.36 0.38 41.88 41.96 Downstream 41.31 45.00 41.81 3.19 0.51 41.82 41.88 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER ' d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06105 06:07:19 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 ` Detailed Report for J-9 Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 0.36 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.36 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.34 in/hr Upstream CA 0.04 acres Total CA 0.04 acres Flow Times ' Description Description System Flow Time 5.29 min Upstream Flow Time 5.29 min Elevations Description Description HGL In 41.88 ft HGL Out 41.88 ft Ground Elevation 46.36 ft Rim Elevation 46.36 It Other Properties Description Description ' x -62.65 ft y 28.56 ft Velocity 1.11 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headless Coefficient 0.00 Station 1+84 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs ' 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD . d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES 05/06/05 06:07:1.1 PM. . Haestad Methods, Inc, 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer. PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-27 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch Number Sections: 1 0 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.18 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 0.79 cfs . 0.17 ft Length 29.00 ft Energy Slope 0.007869 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.011724 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.27 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 1.69 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.29 min Downstream Velocity 1.11 ftis System Flow Time 5.29 min ' Grade Elevations ' Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. Location Invert ' Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.84 45.98 42.34 3.64 0.21 42.05 42.13 Downstream 41.50 46.36 42.00 4.36 0.38 41.88 41.90 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 0&06/05 06:06:53 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. - 37 Brookside Road• Waterbwy, GT 06708 - (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for NDS #7 Watershed Information ' Area C (acres) 0.02 0.95 Total 0.02 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.02 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.02 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.18 cfs ' Flows Description Description ' Total Discharge 0.18 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.18 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.02 acres Inlet CA 0.02 acres External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times i D ti D i ti p on escr escr on p Systerh Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ' i i D i ti Descr pt on escr p on HGL In 42.05 ft HGL Out 42.05 ft Ground Elevation 45.98 ft Rim Elevation 45:98 ft Other Properties D i ti tion Descri escr p on p x -50.66 ft Y 57.33 ft Velocity 2.27 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+13 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs ?I Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:Xhaestadlstmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:06:44 1DW .• Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-30 Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.27 cfs Capacity 0.53 cfs Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.13 ft Length 47.00 ft Energy Slope 0.004106 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005319 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 2.59 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 2.14 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.37 min Downstream Velocity 1.69 ft/s System Flow Time 5.37 min Grade Elevations 11 Upstream 41.78 46.00 42.28 3.72 0.26 42.04 42.15 Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Downstream 41.53 45.27 42.03 3.24 0.38 41.91 41.95 Messages: Profile: Possible hydraulic jump, critical depth assumed upstream. ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05'06:06:32 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for R - 5 ' Watershed Information Area C ' (acres) 0.03 0.95 Total 0.03 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.03 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.03 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.27 cfs ' Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.27 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.27 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.03 acres Inlet CA 0.03 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times ' D i ti Description on escr p System Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min ' Elevations ' D i ti Description escr p on HGL In 42.04 ft HGL Out 42.04 ft Ground Elevation 46.00 ft Rim Elevation 46.00 ft ' Other Properties ' tion D i Description escr p X -26.16 ft Y 54.23 ft Velocity 2.59 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 2+22 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES ' 05/06/05 06:06:24 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer. PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-28 Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.18 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 0.52 cfs 0.2e-2 ft Length 10.00 ft Energy Slope 0.000831 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005000 ftfft Upstream Velocity 1.28 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 1.19 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.14 min Downstream Velocity 1.11 ft is System Flow Time 5.14 min ' Grade Elevations ' Messages: Profile: Steep (S1) profile, without hydraulic jump, hydraulic grade increases in downstream direction. Violation: does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) .. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 41.55 46.36 42.05 4.31 0.34 41.89 41.91 Downstream 41.50 46.36 42.00 4.36 0.38 41.88 41.90 ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:07:45 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for R - 6 ' Watershed Information Area C ' (acres) 0.02 0.95 Total 0.02 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.02 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.02 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.18 efs ' Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.18 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.18 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.02 acres Inlet CA 0.02 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres ' Flow Times Description Description Systein Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ' ti n D i Description escr p o HGL In 41.89 ft HGL Out 41.89 It ' Ground Elevation 46.36 ft Rim Elevation 46.36 ft Other Properties ' tion D i Description escr p x -67.28 ft y 49.23 ft Velocity 1.28 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 1+94 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs II? ' Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:Utaestadlstmc\03-1460\basin2.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 06:07:32 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Outlet NDS #3 NDS #2 NDS #1 P-3 P-2 P-1 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 04:01:47 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Outlet Flows ' Description Description Total Discharge 0.98 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cis Total Watershed (CIA) 0.98 cis Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.28 in/hr Upstream CA 0.10 acres ' Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 5.59 min Upstream Flow Time 5.59 min ' Elevations Description Description HGL In 42.00 ft HGL Out 42.00 ft ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft ' Other Properties Description Description X -57.60 ft Y 29.44 ft ' Velocity 5.11 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+00 ft Extergal Flow 0.00 cfs 1 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD d:\haestadlstmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PR OFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES ' 05/06/05 04:01:13 PM. - . Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer. PEER StormCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-3 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description ' Discharge Mannings Coefficient 0.98 cfs 0.010 Capacity Hydraulic Drop 0.46 cfs 0.61 ft Length 33.00 ft Energy Slope 0.017810 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.003939 Wit Upstream Velocity 4.99 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.48 min Average Velocity 5.05 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.11 min Downstream Velocity 5.11 ft/s System Flow Time 5.59 min ' Grade Elevations ' Messages: Profile: Subcritical flow. Profile: Downstream depth below critical depth, critical depth assumed. ' Profile: Mild channel slope. Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 42.13 45.00 42.63 2.37 0.95 43.08 43.46 Downstream 42.00 45.00 42.50 2.50 0.47 42.47 42.88 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER ' d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StorrnCAD v1.0 05/06/05 04:01:05 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for NDS #3 ' Watershed Information Area C ' (acres) 0.03 0.95 Total 0.03 0.95 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.03 acres Inlet C 0.95 Inlet CA 0.03 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.27 cfs ' Flows Description Description ' Total Discharge 0.98 cis Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.98 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.30 in/hr Upstream CA 0.08 acres Total CA 0.10 acres Inlet CA 0.03 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times ' D i ti Description p on escr System Flow Time 5.48 min Upstream Flow Time 5.48 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ' i ti D Description escr p on HGL In 43.08 ft HGL Out 43.08 ft ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft Other Properties D i ti Description on escr p x -29.44 It Y 29.44 ft Velocity 3.64 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+33 ft External Flow 0.00 cis Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 04:00:57 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-2 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch Number Sections: 1 Description _ Description Discharge 0.72 cfs Capacity 0.52 cfs ' Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.34 ft Length 35.00 ft Energy Slope 0.009616 ft/ft Constructed Slope 0.005143 Wit Upstream Velocity 3.64 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.32 min Average Velocity 3.64 ft/s ' Pipe Flow Time 0.16 min Downstream Velocity 3.64 fUs System Flow Time 5.48 min Grade Elevations Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL (ft)- (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft). .. (ft) (ft) . Upstream 42.31 45.00 42.81 2.19 1.10 43.41 43.62 Downstream 42.13 45.00 42.63 2.37 0.95 43.08 43.28 ' Messages: Profile: Pressure Flow Information: Surcharged condition Project Idle: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER ' d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD 0.0 05/06/05 04:00:50 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 ' ' Watershed Information Area C (acres) 0.04 0.95 Total 0.04 0.95 Rational Formula Detailed Report for NDS #2 Inlet Drainage Area 0.04 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.04 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.36 cfs ' Flown ' Description Description Total Discharge 0.72 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.72 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data ' Description Description System Intensity 9.34 in/hr Upstream CA 0.04 acres Total CA 0.08 acres Inlet CA 0.04 acres ' External CA 0.00 acres Flow Times ' tion D i Description escr p Systekn Flow Time 5.32 min Upstream Flow Time 5.32 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ' tion D cri Description p es HGL In 43.41 ft HGL Out 43.41 It ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft Other Properties ' D i ti Description p on escr x 5.12 ft Y 29.44 ft Velocity 1.83 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 0+68 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs H Project Tittle: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 04:00:42 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 Detailed Report for Pipe P-1 ' Section Material: PVC Section Shape: Circular Section Size: 6 inch ' Number Sections: 1 Description Description Discharge 0.36 cfs Capacity 0.52 cfs Mannings Coefficient 0.010 Hydraulic Drop 0.09 ft Length 35.00 ft Energy Slope 0.002437 Wit Constructed Slope 0.005143 ft/ft Upstream Velocity 1.83 ft/s Upstream Flow Time 5.00 min Average Velocity 1.83 ftts Pipe Flow Time 0.32 min Downstream Velocity 1.83 ft/s System Flow Time 5.32 min ' Grade Elevations Location Invert Ground Crown Cover Depth HGL EGL ' (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Upstream 42.49 45.00 42.99 2.01 1.01 43.50 43.55 Downstream 42.31 45.00 42.81 2.19 1.10 43.41 43.47 ' Messages: Profile: Pressure Flow Information: Surcharged condition Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer: PEER ' d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StorrnCAD v1.0 05/06/05 04:00:36 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for NDS #1 ' Watershed Information Area C ' (acres) 0.04 0.95 Total 0.04 0.95 t Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 0.04 acres Inlet C 0.95 ' Inlet CA 0.04 acres Time of Concentration 5.00 min Inlet Intensity 9.40 in/hr Inlet Discharge 0.36 cfs ' Flows Description Description Total Discharge 0.36 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 crs Total Watershed (CIA) 0.36 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 9.40 in/hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 0.04 acres Inlet CA 0.04 acres External CA 0.00 acres ' Flow Times i D i Descri tion escr pt on p System Flow Time 5.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min ' Inlet TC 5.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations ' ti n D i Description p escr o HGL In 43.50 ft HGL Out 43.50 ft ' Ground Elevation 45.00 ft Rim Elevation 45.00 ft Other Properties ' D i ti Description on escr p x 42.56 ft Y 29.27 ft Velocity 1.83 ft/s Headloss 0.00 ft ' Headloss Coefficient 0.00 Station 1+03 ft Extemal Flow 0.00 cfs Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/05 04:00:23 PM Haestad Methods, Inc, 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 0 ------------------ Discharge: 0.36 cfs Discharge: 0.72 cfs Discharge: 0.98 cfs Discharge: 0.98 cfs Beginning iteration Discharge: 0.36 cfs Discharge: 0.72 cfs Discharge: 0.98 cfs Discharge: 0.98 cfs Completed iteration segi i at at at at 1 at at at at 1 Tni ng calculation cycle node NDS #1 node NDS #2 node NDS #3 node outlet node NDS #1 node NDS #2 node NDS #3 node outlet current discharge convergence relative error: 0.26283383e-2 Taroet discharge convergence relative error: 0.001 Beginning iteration Discharge: 0.36 cfs Discharge: 0.72 cfs Discharge: 0.98 cfs Discharge: 0.98 cfs 2 at node NDS #1 at node NDS #2 at node NDS #3 at node outlet Discharge Convergence Achieved in 2 iterations: relative error: 0.0 Information: P-2 surcharged condition Information.: P.-1 surcharged condition --------------------- Calculations complete ---------------------- ** Analysis.-Options ** Friction method: Manning's Formula HGL Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum.Network Traversals: 5 Number of Pipe Profile steps: 5 Discharge Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Design Passes: 3 J ------- ---------- Network Quick view ------ -------------- ---- I Hydraulic Grade Label- [- tength f size I Discharge I upstream I Downstream P-1-, 35.00 6 inch 0.36 43.50 43.41 P-2 35.00 6 inch 0.72 43.41 43.08 P-3 33.00 6 inch 0.98 43.08 42.47 Label -I Discharge NDS #1 0.36 NDS #2 0.72 NDS #3 0.98 Outlet 0.98 Elapsed: 0 minute(s) 1 Ground 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 second(s) Elevations - Upstream HGL 43.50 43.41 43.08 42.00 Downstream HGL 43-50 43.41 43.08 42.00 Project Title: Clearwater THE COURTYARD Project Engineer. PEER d:\haestad\stmc\03-1460\basin3.stm PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES StormCAD v1.0 05/06/0504:00:07 PM ' Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 CEEARWATER _COURTYARD OWNER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF STORMWATER-FACILITY FIGURE 17 r i OWNER'S INSTRUCTION FOR MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF STORMWATER FACILITY TITLE Sand Filter Percolation / Retention Pond Pervious Concrete Rock Parking Facility Biological Treatment Pond PAGE NO. i-3 4 5 6 7 E, OWNER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF SAND FILTER FACILITIES Drainage systems should be inspected on a routine basis to ensure that they are functioning properly. Inspections can be on an annual or semi-annual basis, but should always be conducted following major storms. Systems that incorporate infiltration are most critical since poor maintenance practices can soon render them inefficient. Visual inspections of sand filters, control structures, and outfall pipes are highly recommended. It should be-stressed that good records should be kept on all maintenance operations to help plan future work an identify facilities requiring attention. Sand filter surfaces are sometimes scarified or break up silt deposits and restore porosity. This should be accomplished after all sediment has been removed from the surface. After removing large debris (cups, paper, wood, etc...) it is recommended that raking the top 3" will properly scarify the surface or it may be required to replace the sand. Another technique requires removing the sand for washing. The filter system is designed to have a wet-dry cycle to inhibit algae. or bacterial growth. Cleanout frequency of filter beds will depend on whether they are vegetated or non-vegetated and will be a function of their storage capacity, infiltration characteristics, volume of inflow and sediment load. Filter beds should be inspected closely at least once a year. Perforated'underdrain pipes are located T below the sandf anrd-cleaaouts are located at the end of the system. In the event of sediment build-up in the underdrain pipe cleaning can be accomplished through the cleanout with several of the techniques .oulliacd.below. METHODS AND EQUIPMENT FOR CLEANOUT OF SYSTEMS Various types of equipment are available commercially for maintenance of drainage systems. The most frequently used equipment and techniques are listed below: ' 1. VACUUM PUMP ' This device is normally used to remove sediments from sumps and pipes. The equipment for this system is generally mounted on a vehicle. Is requires a 200 - 300 gallon (0.757 - 1.36m) holding tank and a vacuum pump that has a 10" (254mm) diameter flexible hose with ' a serrated metal end for breaking up cake sediment. A two-man crew can clean a catch basin in 5 to 10 minutes. This system can remove stores-, bricks-, leaves, litter, and sediment deposits. Normal working depth is 0 to 20'(0 - 6m). H 2. WATERJET SPRAY ' This equipment is generally mounted on a self-contained vehicle with a high pressure pump and a 200 - 300 gallon (0.760-1.40m) water supply. A 3" (76mm) flexible hose line with ' a metal nozzle that directs jets of water at a reverse angle, which propels the nozzle forward while blasting debris backwards toward the catch basin. As the hose line is reeled in, the jetting action forces all debris to the catch basin where it is removed by the vacuum pump ' equipment. Normal length of hose is approximately 200 feet (61 m). Because of the energy supplied by the water jet,_it should not be used to clean erodible trench walls. 3. COMPRESSED AIR JET ' The compressed air jet.can be used to clean an&removedebris from said filter systems This equipment could require a holding tank for the water and debris removed, a source of water supply, an air compressor, two (2).J/ (6.4mm) air lines,-a. diffusion chamber, and a 4" ' (I02mm)-diameter pipe to carry the silty water and other debris from the underdrain pipe. As the silty water enters the diffusion chamber (to which the other air line is connected0 it becomes filled with entrairred-airand is forced u the 4" (102mm) disposal pipe and out of the ' tip of the cleanout by the denser water entering the bottom of the diffusion chamber intake. In this manner the entire length of underdrain-pipe can be cleansed. ' 4. SURGING AND PUMPING ' This procedure is another means of removing silt and rejuvenating a sand filter bed. The process involves partially filling the filter wit water and then pumping a snug fitting plunger in and out within the underdrain pipe. This action loosens silt and sediment lodged in the filter fabric and immediately adjacent sand; and pulls it into -the underdrain. Surging is immediately followed bypumping silt-laden water from the underdrain pipe. If the filter bed is situated in clayey soil or if clay materials have been washed into the filter; the surging and ' air jetting methods will be more effective if sodium polyphospate is added to the water in the underdrain prior to cleaning or redeveloping. A2 - 5 ppm concentration of this chemical will deflocculate clay particles in the underdrain pipe and immediately surrounding sand, and the ' clay can be pumped or jetted out very easily. Depth is limited by the pumping capacity available. ' 5. FIRE HOSE FLUSHING This equipment consists of various fittings that can be placed on the end of a fire hose such as rotating nozzles, rotating cutters, etc. When this equipment is dragged through a pipe, it can be effective in removing light material from walls. ?l M 6. SEWER JET FLUSHERS Sewer jet flushers are usually truck-mounted and consist of a large water tank of at least 1000 gallons (3.785m3), a triple action water pump capable of producing 1000 psi (6900 KN/m2) or more pressure, a gasoline motor to run the pump, hose reel large enough for 500 feet (153m) of 1-inch (25mm) inside diameter high pressure hose, and a hydraulic pump to operate the hose reel. In order to. clean pipes properly a minimum nozzle pressure of 600 psi (4140 KN/m2 ) is required. All material is flushed ahead of the nozzle by spray action. This extremely mobile machine can be used for cleaning areas with light grease problems, sand and gravel infiltration, and for general cleaning. ' April 1, 2005 Project No. 1789 K. C. KANNAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS E-MAIL: RKANNANOa GATE.NET WEB PAGE: WWW.GATE.NET/-RKANNAN ' Mr. Nick Ferraioli 710 South Fort Harrison Ave. Clearwater, Fl 33756-5304 ' Mr. Paul V. Sherma, P.E. C/o Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. 646-94'h Ave. North Saint Petersburg, Florida 33702-2463 Re: Proposed Drainage Improvement ' Druid Courtyard Druid Road and MLK Avenue, Clearwater, FL ' Dear Mr- Eerraioli: As requested by your consultant Mr. Paul Sherma of Professional Engineering ' Resources, Inc. (PEER) we conducted two standard penetration test borings on March 31", 2005 at the locations indicated by PEER. This report presents our recommendations for the seasonal high water elevation for the proposed drainage improvements. ' The proposed location of the retention areas were marked on a survey provided by Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. and was located in the field by our office using ' existing landmarks. The soil profile and the water table recorded are included in a table in this report. The seasonal high water table was estimated from soil profile, soil color, observed water table elevations and a "stain line" was identified. The water table was ' recorded at the test location at the time of the fieldwork. SOIL PERMEABILITY FOR POND DESIGN: The soil profile at the test location is shown in the table in this report. Generally the soil profile consists of sand to a depth of about 10' below the surface, underlain by sand with ' silt to 20', the maximum depth probed in SPT-2. Borings SPT-1 and SPT-2 were terminated at 10' and 20' respectively, and was adequate to evaluate the seasonal high and water table ' lines. The ground surface elevation was taken as an approximation from aerial maps, which was +45.00 at the location of the two borings conducted within the proposed ponds. The seasonal high water elevation, based on the presence of organic stains is estimated at 96" ' below the ground surface, which would give a value of +37.00 NGVD. P. 0. Box 7525 Seminole, FL 33775-7525 PHONE: (727) 548 8080 FAX (727) 548 1978 FIGURE 18 i 1 1 1 1 Seasonal High at Druid Road Clearwater, FL March 31, 2005 SPT-2 Depth Soil Description and Classification 0 - 8' Poorly graded SAND (SP), light gray (2.5Y 7/1) to white (2.5Y 8/1), fine 8'- 10' Poorly graded.SAND (SP), very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2), fine, prominent Fe stains at 8' depths, hard pan silt layer at 9'-3" denoting water table 10'- 20' SAND w/ SILT and slight SILTY SANDS (SP-SM), black (10YR 2/1), wet We appreciate this opportunity of providing this service to you. If you have any questions or when we may be of further assistance, please call us. Thank you. ncerely, C Kannan & Associates, Inc. Ramanuja C. Kannan, P.E. Florida Registration No. 38688 cc: Attn: Mr. Paul Sherma, P.E. Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. R. C. KANNAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 2 of 2 0 0 0 0 m MARTIN LUTHER KING JR, AVENUE .. ?, --------------------------------------------------------- G cl) 0 r 00 0 X z G) r 0 n d I'll 0 z (l) I 1 I I I I ? I II I I I 1 t '?' 11 I? I r, i I: II I , I:I I ,? I I ?'' '•'' I crp iI ii I ' I` ?"? ? ? r ::I n I lot I I? I ------------------- ?I j I .. ?? r fa 0-10.1 j I -- -- -- -- -- ---- r--- --- =ii $ E'' r\ F. r.T JL 1 ?.a....,? _- f- J-:. \\ ?\ I I I:;I ?I I ?• 1 II - ----------------------------------------------- II r O k? i? i / / / 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d 1 ?7 I C I d I I ? p I D I d I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I JOB NO: 1789 dwg. DATE:-2/11/04 SCALE: 1" = 40' Mr. FRS PROPOSED CONDOS DRUID AND M.L.K. AVE CLEARWATER, FL SOIL BORING LOCATION SKETCH R.C. KANNAN and ASSOCIATES, INC. 7421 -114TH AVE. N., SUITE 203 LARGO, FL 33773 PHONE: (727) 548-8080 FAX: (727) 548-1 email: rkannan@gate.net web: www.aate.net/-Amnnan Ym go No M 0 STANDARD PENETRATION TEST The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is a widely used method of in-situ testing of soils and sampling. The test method has been now "Standardized" as "Penetration Test and Sampling of Soils" under the ASTM (American Society for the Testing of Materials). Designation D-1586. The test involves driving a 18 or 24 inch (30 centimeter) long, longitudinally split sampler with a 140 pound (63.5 Kg.) hammer falling freely through 30 inches (75 centimeter) drop. The number of blows required for each 6 inches of driving is recorded. The number of blows required for the last 12 inches (30 centimeter) of driving is recorded as the "N" value. The N Value from the SPT has been correlated to various soil engineering properties and allows a conservative estimate of the soil behavior under loading conditions. The sampler is usually driven from the surface or from a depth of one foot belotiv the surface, and is driven to provide continuous samples to a depth of about 6 to 10 feet below the surface. The borehole is then advanced by rotary drilling using either a hollow stem auger or rotary drilling equipment using drilling mud. When drilling with the bentornite mud is difficult, a casing is driven and the sampling continued inside the casing. The casing will be advanced as the boring progresses. After completion of the test boring, it is plugged, sometimes using a neat cement grout. Representative samples obtained from the split spoon sampler are visually examined, classified according to the Unified Soil Classification. System (ASTM D-2487) and packed and transported for further laboratory tests. These samples are considered "disturbed" samples and special techniques are used for obtaining relatively "undisturbed" samples for use in more elaborate laboratory tests. Samples are normally retained in the laboratory and discarded after 30 days unless otherwise advised by the client. SPT Sampler Sampler Head -? Drain Holes Bail-Check Valve Split Barrel Barrel Shoe or Driveshoe Sampler (open view) Seating 6• Blow Count I 2b i 6' I i N-Value 3a K SOIL BORING LOG BORING B-1 Proj. No: 11789 R. C. KANNAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 7525 Seminole, FL 33775 7421-114th Avenue North, Suite 203, Largo, FL 33773 Phone: (727) 548 8080 Fax: (727)5481978 Client: Nick Ferraioli Boring Date: April 1, 2005 Project: Druid Courtyard, Druid Rd. and MLK Ave, 20'-2" North and 117'-4" Clearwater, FI Location: East of SW corner of Crew: CDS Drilling Water Table Depth: 9'-3" below surface property Depth FT. SPT Blow counts - N Soil Description T- CO U') W Symbol 2-2-2-2 4 Very loose poorly graded SAND (SP), white 2.5Y 8/1 w/ brown mottling 5 2-1-2-2 3 Very loose poorly graded SAND (SP), light gray Loose poorly graded , white 3-5-3-5 8 (2.5Y 8/1), w/ brown mottling - 4-4-6-4 10 Loose poorly grade dSAND (SP), white 2.5Y 8/1 w/Fe stains @ 8' depths 10 Medium dense SAND (SP), very dark grayish 6-8-8-9 16 brown 10YR 3/2 .. 15 Boring terminated at 10' below ground surface 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 R. C. KANNAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 7525 Seminole, FL 33775 SOIL BORING LOG BORING 7421-114th Avenue North, Suite 203, Largo, FL 33773 B-2 Proi. No: 1789 Phone: (727) 548 8080 Fax: (727)5481978 Client: Nick Ferraioli Boring Date: April 1, 2005 Project: Druid Courtyard, Druid Rd. and MLK Ave, 55' 2" North and 24' West f Location: a Cle rwater, FI SE corner of property Crew: CDS Drilling Water Table Depth: 9'-3" below surface Depth FT SPT Blow counts - N Soil Description N - Value o Symbol . c N ° Very loose poorly graded SAND (SP), light gray 1-2-2-2 4 2.5Y 7/1 w/ brown mottling 5 2-3-3-4 6 Loose poorly graded SAND (SP) , white (2.5Y 8/1) 4-3-4-5 7 Loose poorly graded , white 3-4-4-5 8 2.5Y 8/1 w/ Fe stains @ 8' SHWT 10 Loose SAND (SP), very dark grayish brown WT 4-4-5-6 9 10YR 3/2 15 Medium dense SAND w/ SILT (SP-SM), black 4-6-6 12 10YR 2/1 Medium dense slightly SILTY SAND (SM-SP), 20 10-10-11 21 black (10YR 2/1) Boring terminated at 20' below ground surface 25 30 35 40 45 50 1 0 fl UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL NAMES C/) Well-graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or Z J Q w GW no fines J ° o d) l1.1 v Poorly graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no L E?s y GP fines o cu .c _r Co z° w GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures LO Z ° as C5 ??" GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures ?N ?? o o W N ZZ SW Well-graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines QJ L zz N d1 C o O h E o :s ° _ o 0 N SP Poorly graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines U Cis Wz In H U) o o= W SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures C. N U_ SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures ML Inorganic silts, very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands r U E ? • Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy o N, o ¢C's CL clays, silty clays, lean clays y C/) U) d) J ? W 'H E75 0L Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity °o ?N w MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silts, LL zU)E? ¢ elastic silts >-? Co s ?? Qaj CH Inorganic clays or high plasticity, fat clays &5 J OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Highly Organic Soils PT Peat, muck and other highly organic soils ' Based on the material passing the 3-in. (75-mm) sieve. AASHTO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM a Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures (with Suggested Subgroups) General Silt-Clay Materials Classification Granular Materials (35% or less passing No. 200) (More than 35% passing No. 200) A7 A-1 A-2 A-7-5 Group Classification A-1-a A-1-b A-3 A-2-4 A-2.5 A-2-6 A-2.7 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7-6 A-11' Sieve analysis, percent passing: No. 10 50 max No. 40 30 max 50 max 51 min. No. 200 15 max 25 max 10 max 35 max 35 max 35 max 35 max 36 min. 36 min. 36 min. 36 min. Characteristics of fraction passing No 4a Liquid firm! 40 max 41 min. 40 max 41 min. 40 max 41 min. 40 max 41 min. Plasticity index 6 max NP 10 max 10 max 11 min. 11 min. 10 max 10 max 11 min. 11 min. Usual types of signifi- Stone fragments. Fine Silty or clayey gravel and sand Silly soils Clayey soils Organic soils gravel and cant constituent sand sand nuterials General rating as I subgra0e ?- Excellent to good I Fair to poor I poor a Classification procedure: V.%n req uired test data available. proceed front left to right on above chart and correct group will be found by the process of elimination. The first group from the left into which the test data will rn is the correct classification. b A-7.5 I PI 9 U. - 30: it PI > LL - 30. C A-6 Group refers to Peat and Muck Soils. CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA Cu = D6o/ D,o Greater than 4 c N s (D30)z Between 1 and 3 c;c .? acs= DioxD6o CO CO N or U) N d S cu a(j.s E Not meeting both criteria for CW C7 U' m w * * line Atterberg limits plot below A Atterberg limits plotting in ? co coma or plasticity index less than 4 hatched area are borderline ° Atterberg limits plot above 'A" line classifications requiring use of to m and plasticity index greater than 7 dual symbols •N m ? o Cu = Dso/ Djo Greater than 6 C o o °' O o ° (Doo)z g z° H o Cc = Drox D? Between 1 and 3 U dZ ` o N n Not meeting both criteria for SW y ?? cu ; N o Atterberg limits plot below'A' line Atterberg limits plotting in :S s o .? or lastici index less than 4 ty hatched area are borderline d o a Q limits plot above 'W ' line Atterbergg classifications requiring use of ,, and plasticity index greater than 7 dual symbols RELATIVE DENSITY (sand) Very Loose - 0 to 4 Blows Loose 5 to 10 Blows Medium Dense - 11 to 30 Blows Dense - 31 to 50 Blows Very Dense - + 51 Blows Limestone- No penetration resistance unless specified. 60 50 40 CL X 0 30 z U 20 v7 10 CL 7 4 CONSISTENCY (clay, silts) Very Soft - 0 to 2 Blows Soft - 3 to 4 Blows Firm - 5 to 8 Blows stiff 9 to 15 Blows Very Stiff - 16 to 30 Blows Hard - + 30 Blows (Blows per 1 foot = 0.305m) PLASTICITY CHART Goo Z oG MH rOH MU or OL 0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 LIQUID LIMIT (LL) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rf*wcd r'y MW I'M R14 sK kAMA W. %4*4, Grpt.ro Wi6m, rent .k L "VOIAM PA <nt Nwe Luwm Avwut Ck?rr•aktft. WJA Ws2J.al1•W THIS INDENTURE, wwvreti •WK r•? •(A?,,.r.rMn+lw 1wN, M W KIM ?Ii/At?wa*M ,YpY,r?e?e{byi,,erl?telrlhLo?d?e.A,wa1^r .Wa4?c4-L. ? . +?.+, M.5 J•?•{ q.. Mn'w+' Ma rAa M w??,.??w?'+w n 4atrwWet a s? our "'s Moo this 26tts day oaf - tarruary A, 13, 2WS latwescn RDBBRT w. Wj"OW esd ALAN I. WILSON, Te sshw poder else ROMP W WII 90M LIVIA!G TRUST AGREF MNT dated &pt%,4tr 1% 2002, w?waa ma;l V addrat is: P.O. E6x 18.S, Cla+r+retrl, FloMA 33757 p+rty of'& fait pwt, and GI.IARWAWR LAND LM, 6 Taxes l trssiW Part wv4u'p , whoso rdailiny iddroar u, I7480I)sBts ForkwtY.5mu t 1 P,1?r?Ilps, ri?ear 7i2ry pert' of the ovond port, W ita>swsssh, t#sat. tlie, o?id g?np . of dw >Rrq , {a?_ s!d j, p?eirk:,rt; n mfa n * d Tee 1]eltars and ad pod and vaWWc wnsi w*v' w, b it in Lend paid by tore SW VojW of t11o w6M pm, tk mAAipt w1?cr it hwtby xknWo4cd, hu grwftd. bwzdscd and sold so oho ssid'prV'VAbo sgcmd:W. larnw, dte fWWile Lorca land, eitupto lyh* sad beiv tit the Cowify of Pinslim, Sluts of Florida. w wir Startins ar WAV castor orOm bE VA at the SW '/., 1512M. t sad run 594'03':2" l3 M 09" dw R dd 4U•? Jino 295.16 R, thartto Soak p'04'31l" Were ri3,1 b fctt;tbe?ttNorth 69'03'?Z"LYpi24S,i6 loci; lfsaaca Noah OV431" last 291:16. teat w ths, P.02., ? ce?IS fer rlgyttrof wW ef Cksm.woa Avamm and ORrid I, mL Lea e«d VaCKA *at Pard= eoa*md to Ow city of cearwster in OR E D& 3w, rage f59, Y>zt+tbt x=' dvdTtncNas Coaw1, P1orlda, Mm io appso dmstsly 265 it 265 of mietble Iartd2 *:oportr Appraiser's fallo f?+o++}Go.. c + r ?u ?.t s rna_nnct?9s?1 Iln THIS t& NM TM M=EAD pt' OMTV OP THE RS hs tiro said party oCAke r6* TM do`a htr ' ° ' laseel??o`sntdisina: see wilt etbr d tlsa Alma adaisat the lawitd cttixur of t11 porsoQltz ?:1<ptntcscxu.. _ , ; . A? ? ' ?°AR9a ?ri? srsid Sxra??. eitit laae:?c ?r Jassr?s(]y satz?+d td slid lane is rat iiatptc; *at dc Cfr? has hood er?e fonvEvl a+ .jjr to Mn wad sa••ry'a:d IWO; &jd the Grobr lserely "y w=mm Cue tit3c m taid ]dad aad VAR domd ft Beau did "Ro a) twms of Pd2003 oc cad s? lord is Lea cf ai1 tsnamtbr?, exttpt ?c;t ?ccruoAs ogao?rt . rraenctnxu of reoad Ito tom! VAOWL dig reed party ? duo tint part bee ta,aod these pitsw" x+ bo wiw lu Ito 11c= rued mm nWd by ill Petal PiWC11+ IM d* mid year e6ovz w"n" s*'W, Scaled A" Or3iveaar in ORr Prearrte: f+? Ito tN ? v"?1 ?i?,uns+r _ rv?e? STA'CR OR >n.oMA r% , tasdel'th0 Rcbost W. Villrgvpn Livirt7rarx At%-Wwt c6h:d kAOPF j11Q30L>'. ---1 L6. NAN SLUES N. T.'t stabs" d. pabsrrn W. Mhos t. curt pv=mtt,t "'d Septmba 11, W2 FittHI.T COITNTY OF _ brim The fartfaiq indruasriTwee saSarC' 8? *to" dolor Israxsry, 21,05 by ROBLRZ' W. N 71n?scs, v?ItD:rt rmt tof++C M I•aro p;6htgd niveis, 9%00 ta .?. n:.W.(en 1=1rrs;r+ts?. )O t1t?l? N Pwisifa FIGURE 19' '3' it , 0 C CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: _NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont from 07-19-05) Home Energy, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.63 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 feet (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 43.17 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.5 ft (from roof deck) and an additional 13.67 ft for an open rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-4041, with reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape • buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [4 townhomes and 16 condominiums]) at 415 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 17 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-04035 2. (Copt from 07-19-05) Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc., & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in ht from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building), reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr (donor site) to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec's 4- 1402 and 4-1403 and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [13 condominium units]) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2005-03032/TDR2005-03019 3. Religious Community Services, Inc. (The Haven of RCS) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a white PVC fence 6 ft in ht within the front (east) setback along • North Saturn Ave without substantial grill work and masonry columns and without a 3 foot wide landscape strip on the street side of the fence as otherwise required by Sec's 3-804.A.1 and 3 on a • property within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) district, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Community Residential Homes) at 1520 N Saturn Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05038 4. Ardent International Ltd Liability Co, Panayiotis Vasiloudes, and Helen Vasiloudes (M313 Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft to pool deck and 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade and 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 1-3. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 5. TSE TSE, LLC (M313 Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 58 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 3.33 ft to pool deck and 6 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 629, 635 & 637 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 78, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05044 • 6. First Baptist Church of Clearwater (Opus South Corporation, Opus South Contractor's LLC/John Franklin Wade) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow a mixed-use development of 157 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 31 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 10,022 sq ft of non-residential use, with an increase to the permitted ht from 30 ft to 271 ft (to roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments and mechanical equipment (from roof deck), to reduce the non-residential parking requirement from 41 parking spaces to zero (0) parking spaces, and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cleveland St and North Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C., and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along N Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use [169 attached dwellings and 10,022 sq ft non- residential floor area]) at 331 Cleveland St, John R Davey's Resub Blk A, Part of Lots 1-3 & unplatted parcel. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05048 7. Clearwater Land Ltd (Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC/Nicholas F Ferraioli) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 18.5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 1.9 ft (to entry feature column) and an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 55 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.A. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [47 condominiums]) at 1105 Druid Rd, Sec 15-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: one= _-_Wr ls,_-MGR. FLD2005-05037 • • • 8. Religious Community Services, Inc. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit • the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 58 ft (along Myrtle Ave), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd (south) from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Expansion and renovation of the RCS food bank) at 700 Druid Rd, Magnolia Park, Blk 26, Lots 9 & 10 & parts of Lots 1-5 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05046 9. Ronald and Karen Kozan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.65 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building) from 25 ft to 20 ft (to balcony), from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 ft to 46 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 6 ft (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from. 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of See 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [26 condominiums]) at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05045 10. Camille Courtney & Elina Honicky (Henry C. Kyle, III & Robert Elder) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow an addition to an existing single-family residence with a reduction to the front setback from 25 ft to 20.3 ft (to building), under the provisions of Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1415 San Juan Court, Blvd Heights, Blk K, Lot 17 and part of Lot 18. Assigned Planner: John Schodder, Planner I. FLD2005-05052 11. DiVello Land Trust, Fulvio DiVello Trustee (Maddalina DiVello & Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (111 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 83 dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 83 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south along S. Gulfview Blvd.) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (west along Hamden Dr) from 15 ft to 12.5 ft (to building and proposed pavement), from 15 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) • from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter 0 • parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22.5 ft for elevator and stair towers (from roof deck) • and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [83 condominiums]) at 445 Hamden Dr and 504 S Gulfview Blvd, Columbia Sub No. 5, Lots 4-11, and RIP rts and land adj to Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05051 12. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC (E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 112 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 6 ft (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 ft 100 ft for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 ft to 150 ft for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 ft to 90 ft and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of 4 dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, 2 dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, 2 dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units • from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Mixed use of 112 attached dwellings [condominiums], 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33-35, part of Lot 36 and subm land on W. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005-05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. 0 Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/31/05 is 0 FLD2005-0,i037 =,65 DUKE TIEMAN SOUTH CLEARWATER CITIZENS FOR PROGRESS 1120 KINGSLEY STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 BECKETT, TIMOTHY 1002 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 BILELLO, ENZA V 308 MIDLAND AVE GARFIELD NJ 07026 - 1717 CLARIDA, WILLIAM 1703 JOSHUA CT PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4735 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 DAKAN, DEREK DAKAN,BUFFY 1010 MAGNOLIA DR # B CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4079 EICHENLAUB, ERNESTYNA E 1001 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 FOREMAN, ROBERT L JR FOREMAN, PATRICIA A 904 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - GOLOMB & BURNS REALTY INC BURNS, CHRISTINE 1122 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4100 v \Aj AP VALDE, MANUEL ALCALDE, DONNA 1530 ELMWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5403 BIANCHINI, JOSEPH D BIANCHINI, MARISA 1004 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - BROWN, GREGORY W 5429 USHWY19N NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 3949 CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY PO BOX 960 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0960 CLEARWATER PHASE I PARTNERS 1551 SANDSPUR RD MAITLAND FL 32751 - 6138 DESAI, VARSHA S THE DESAI, SUKETU K THE 7593 ARALIA WAY LARGO FL 33777 - 4910 FAVINGER, MICHAEL A FAVINGER, LISA H 1005 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4017 GARCIA, PEDRO J JR 1007 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4017 GOODMAN, SHERRY A 420 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 13401CROFT, GEORGE V BANCROFT, MAXIMIANA 1007 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4035 BICKERSTAFFE, ROBERT D BICKERSTAFFE, BARBARA B 1007 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - BUTE, WAYNE 1006 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 CLEARWATER HOUSING CORP INC 210 SO EWING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CORREA, MARILYN S 906 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID OAKS PROPERTIES LLC 11201 VALLEY SPRINGS LN STUDIO CITY CA 91602 - 2635 FOAT, ELLA E EST 1006 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 GODWIN, WINIFRED L 1009 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 GOUDY, DAVID JR 13308 THOUROUGHBRED LOOP LARGO FL 33771 - GOVAN, DENIS D HEALTH CARE R E I T INC HIDDEN OAKS APT INC 807 MAGNOLIA DR 1 SEAGATE STE 1500 7641 CUMBERLAND RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4031 TOLEDO OH 43603 - LARGO FL 33777 - 2007 f t HUTCHESON, DAVID D ACHESON, WILLIAM C JR HOCHESON, WILLIAM C JR HUTCHESON, WILLIAM C JR HUTCHESON, DAVID D HUTCHESON, DAVID D PO BOX 183 11 FOUNTAIN SQ 252 PINE RD CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0183 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1451 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4413 J A F I LLC JONES, ROBERT L KALIS, JAMES JONES, BETTY J 1012 DRUID RD E 1004 E JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5606 2946 GULF TO BAY BLVD # 66 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4222 LICCIARDI, SAMUEL A JR LUCAS, CLIFFORD L LYLES-SANZO, TRICIA 215 N JEFFERSON AVE LUCAS, ARLINE PORTER, KAREN S CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4719 1011 PINE ST 1015 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4017 MADISON GLEN REAL ESTATE LLC MATTHEWS, ULYSSES C MC BRIDE, MATTHEW O 701 MADISON AVE S MATTHEWS, ELOISE MC BRIDE, DEBRA A CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1015 PINE ST 1000 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4018 MORITZ-SCOTT, MARY L NICHOLAS FERRAIOLI OBERG, RALPH D 97 MINEOLA DR E 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE 1009 DRUID RD LARGO FL 33770 - 1907 SUITE 106 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PECORARO, CARMINE J JR PERDOMO, OVIDIO PERKINS, EDGAR M 444 N PAULA DR 1002 MAGNOLIA DR PERKINS, JEANNINE F DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 1825 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4036 1006 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4036 PERSECHINO, FRANK PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE RAVIN, SHELDON J 902 S MARTIN LUTHER KING AVE 419 E SHORE DR RAVIN, ALAINE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4048 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 133 MIRAMAR DR COLORADO SPGS CO 80906 - 7668 ROGERS, SCOTT I ROOP, ROBERT SPRADLING, MARY B ROGERS, MARIAN M ROOP, SHARON 912 DRUID RD E 15 FOUNTAIN SQ 2500 GULF BLVD # 105B CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5604 BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1451 BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3540 SULLIVAN, REGINALD E TAYLOR, MARGARET TOZSER, IMRE SULLIVAN, URSULA B 1005 PINE ST TOZSER, ANNE E 2952 ADRIAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5623 1751 BRAXTON BRAGG LN LARGO FL 33774 - 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1102 WILSON, ROBERT W THE WOODWARD, STEWART G WOODY, NATHAN L WILSON NAN I THE WOODY JOAN E ' 1005 DRUID RD E ' PO BOX 185 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5605 800 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0185 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - WRIGHT, TONY A 1004 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4036 ZEVETCHIN, KATHERINE A 808 EWING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4006 s • WILSON, FORD & LOVELACE, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROBERT W. WILSON EDWIN I. FORD* WILLIAM K. LOVELACE' *OF COUNSEL LLM. IN TAXATION August 2, 2005 401 S. LINCOLN AVE. ESTATE PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TAX, CORPORATION & BUSINESS LAW TELEPHONE (727) 446-1036 REAL PROPERTY LAW FAX (727) 446-1037 email fordlove@tampabay.rr.com City of Clearwater Ofllclal Records and L et?ielat; e Services a` P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 Gentlemen: I received a notice from the Community Development Board with reference to some changes in the setbacks at 1105 Druid Road. I'm sure your records will reveal that this was under contract for nearly two years and the deal was closed in January of this year and I no longer own any portion of this property. Check your records carefully and you will see that I made a deal with the City that if they would change the zoning and cooperate with me they indicated that I could build a building the same size as the one across the street if I would give them land, which I did. At the time we had just wrecked a 5 bedroom house on the property and when I took out the water meter the City assured me that there would be no problem in reinstalling a water meter in the future if I desired, or anyone else who might own the property desired. I'm having all types of questions involving this property, but if you'll check the records you'll find that the property was built on in 1922 and we lived there up until the time that we wrecked the home a few years ago. Very truly yours, T W. WILSON RWW/jad AUG - 4 2Q05 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI`" OF CLEARWATEf1 '? ?`?i-:' a ` ? a • a a ?-?? ? ; tr - i^ - 4 .a' ,? ? { ? :, ? G ? * ? x 4 , a ,,? ct vy C a +.. ?'3,+J may'; M1 J ? h s { ! ?+ ?? h Z . Jt t s , ? 'hy, 1y r J ;..t L k?\?S ?? .i J Notes: ?x COLOR AT YOUR FINGERTIPS SANDBLAST DPR #310 CHINA WHITE a.? DIRT PICKUP RESISTANT Pa x l 2004 STD. 4 The intent and purpose of this sample is to provide a basic representation of Dryvit Systems, Inc. finish ,A textures and colors. it is offered as a sales aid only to ti t , F ` hs3 DRYVIT SYSTEMS INC. guide in final color selection. This color sample shall d , 4_ R not be used for final color selection as color " 4827 MILGEN ROAD differences may occur. Actual color ;:election should be made from 21x4' samples of each finish #x ?`F pLL r + z 4"'' j COLUMBUS, GA 31907 type, texture and color to be used on the project. t t F Samples shall be prepared using the some tools and ;r _ r; 800-227-0050/706-563-8021 techniques proposed for the actual installation by tx ` ' r` a L ? t the applicator/contractor. r , 'a?fjr. Y " S k C ? ?? k? Y ? ?? `$ { 1 r A? f ?Y h? y 1 1 k e A W ''t t } li; - k ° ~ '" 3' ,n ' a r? .( ?y, C F ?l c L M y t .,c •JZ';-.. ° ,5? 1 PAW; r 7 ..i„? t : ?? ?r a ? t rit ?( C r S it ; y Notes: OX , O C O L RATY O?R FTIRTIPS . i ° ? y, ? ? ?? SST ??pp Uf IC - C -,a XSKIN _- #4 _ w y c z w' t QIIRT. PICKUP RESISTMT ' 002 STD. The intent and purpose of this sample is to providr, a ; basic representation of Dryvit Systems, Inc. finish ? s It is offered as a sales aid only to textures and colors ..A s INC DRYVIT SYSTEMS . uide in final color selection. This color sample shall l n ? . , or ot be used for final color selection as co ` 4827 MILGEN ROAD differences may occur. Actual color selection 1 ' 4 u samples of each finish x4 should be made from 2 x `.' GA 31907 COLUMBUS type, texture and co,or to be used on the project. , , Samples shall be prepared using the some tools and j t ?- 563-8021 706 0050 27 techniques proposed for the actual installation by - / - 80-0-2 the applicator/contractor. r ; f . t r? r r `?? .# i ? ? ? ? ?' ? ? " Y. _ 1 t ? '+^ u .f +1 - ? ;?'i ?•. 'P 4:' ' P; ? t- ' ? J 'E, r ? . .J f i ? x '{ :a, ' A:'? i ? mo ? 1 ' ,? f . $ , ,, ?. , . t., ? ( i ? 1 % h ` ? Ll .. r'1S. _? ' .l'. :: i n #l S A ?,{., { ,{ 1... 1 ,: "u. '? ?,b' d,. _ } .?_.u _. U ._.....? _ . z.. ..... ... ?ru-v._, . ....v.v.?_.. .. .iA . ? .. . . o~oo~ ~ ~ ~O~j LEGEND PROPOSED TYPE 'C' PROPOSED E~STING GRATE INLET F,D~O,T, INDEX NO. 232 CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING SAW CUT EXISTING EDGE OF NORTH ]VE EXISTING PAVEMENT PRIOR TO -w- WATER MAIN -w-•- GRATE EL. = 43,50 SIDEWALK AND REPLACE TO MATCH S, INV, = 39,64 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY GRADE, ~CE TO MATCH CONSTRUCTION DF DRIVEWAY -F- - FIRE MAIN -F-•- GRADE, - euM- - RECLAIM WATER MAIN -eLw - - E, INV,.= 39,84 LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF REPLACED SIDEWALK NOT TO EXCEED 4,5% OF REPLACED (GEED 4.5% CONTRACTOR TO TAPER -r~~- REDUCER --{y- - CURB Tp SIDEWALK AND TEMPORARY BLQWOFF - - - pR PAVEMENT (TYP) jam- FIRE HYDRANT - ---i't- GATE VALVE (G~V, s, Box) - - -g- - - \ CONTRACTOR TO MEET AND SIAMESE CONNECTION TO MEET AND CONTRACTtlR Tp PRtlVIDE 2% ~ DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY - - ra•o a \ MATCH EXISTING CURB ELEVATION (TYP.) TYP) URB MAXIMUM CROSS-SLOPE AT WATER METER - -F DRIVEWAY LOCATION. ® - - - _ _ _ SANITARY SEWER LINE _ =ss~= - - ®SSFN•~9•. SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN ®~SSFN~•• PROPOSED. I! LF 12' ADS @ 0,82% PROPOSED 67 LF 12' ADS @ 0,82% ?pPOSED 67 LF ~ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I~ 'ADS @ 0.82% ---o CLEAN tlUT - - - -o PROPOSED OUTFACE ' SANITARY MANHOLE STRUCTURE ~ STORM DRAIN = =sn= _ a ROOF DRAIN o 0 0 h fONTRACTOR i0 REMOVE EXISTING " T,B,M, Ntt1M=46,03 NAVD88 gp 1 EXISTING (SEE DETAIL) pg ~g ASPHALT 1p N91 a'~ °e E%ISTING h~,y° SIDEWALK AND REPLACE TO MATCH Q GRATE INLET + *k" asPHaLr-~ + PROPOSED DRIVEWAY GRADE, ® JUNCTION BOX PROPOSED 49 LF 4' LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF REPLACED ~ ~ ~ ~ . EROSION CONTROL o o ~ 0 0 ~ SIDEWALK NOT TO EXCEED 4.5% ~ OUTFACE STRUCTURE EXIST. SANITARY MANHOLE UNDERDRAIN - T.&N. NRIM~b.03 NAVD88 (SEE DETAIL) • PROPOSED DRAINAGE mss Qo MITERED END SECTION (M~E,SJ 'osJ ~ry1 TOP OF BANK -r-~---~- SWALE <TYP) I FENCE DR WALL - x - x- ~ / ' (TO BE SODDED) a EXISTING ' TRAFFIC ~ed ~~e 2`'9 • END RETAINING WALL - - - EASEMENT DR SETBACK - - - - - - ' ~ CONTRACTOR Tp TRANSITIDN ao.® TRAFFIC FLAW ARROW ' SIGNAL - - EXIST, 2' CURB 6 GUTTER POLE _ RETAINING WALL Tp EXISTING • • • • • SIDEWALK ELEVATIDN WITHIN (~j, HANDICAP PARKING SPACE '::i.. w~ y ~pS~~EXIST. GATE VALVE - PROPERTY LINE EXISTING o EXISTING • • • • • • • • LAST 15' pF WALL ''ll~.~/V^ H~P, OR CHANGE IN SLOPE N/A \ w ) PAINT ~ EXIST, RECLAIMED WATER METER POWER 6 TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX Lp 5,89'03'S2'E, 265,16' .LIGHT POLE --j \ I . 43,50 \ - - - 42,28 ~ o-un- UNDERDRAIN Nia . 41J8 ~ ~F' WERN6 1250 ELEVATIpN 14 x 75 1 EXISTING ........EJfI~TiAG-•- ' 4 CONCRETE'WALK" " k' TRAFFIC ' ' Rw ~ off' ' ' 'e-rz ~ , . , . 4 SIGNAL ~'ii1.~'w.®ozs.~ ~'`ras-e~.®rs.re-S~~t.as-~.r~o.rsra~ ' ' : : • ~ffi : • : j; ' ' • ' ' ' • • ' ~ ( LIGHT POLE CONTOUR - - 9.0 - - BOX a (TO BE SAVED) + • ~~-----~5~ l6 PALM . • • III • • • EXIST]NG )B( ( ag• GATE VALVE " W 43.95 + ' ~ CONTRACTOR TO CALL "SUNSIII~IE" AT 1-800-432-4770, 41,31 AS 44,16 . r ADn ' 45,00 DRY DETENTION 43,75 T,B,M?45,87 s PROPOSED UNDERDRAIN DRY DETENTION 4''35 48 hrs. PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING OR CONSTRUCTION ' ? 41.90 40,85 I NA0. 6 DISK • • 0 T,O,B~ POND EAST SIDE CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) PCJND 42,75 WOOD HRA(E POLE QI I • 42,75 ~ I ~ FOR EXISTllVG UTILITY LOCATIONS, WAVD 8B) ^A 42.64 rte. PI;pPpSED TYPE 'D' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTWG 12; WATERMAIN ~ I 0 42,64 ui 4214 I I GRATE INLET F,D,p~T~ ~ I O O ~O 40 ..•y I 'o • 42,14 INDEX Np, 211 NN 1 • - GRATE EL = 40,85 ' PROPOSED BOTTOM PROPOSED DRAINAGE ~ OF POND EL. = 41,52 42,i 42,52 I INV. = 3950 42,65 TDP OF WAIL S, 42,52 EL. - 42,25 SWALE (TYP) ' •F• 42a (TO BE SODDED) ' 42,65 PROPOSE? 35 LF 6' PVC CSCH 40) PROPOSED M.E.S. W/5'x5' ~s OR ADS (N-12) RIP-RAP PAD ~ , I 1 - e _ GRAPHIC SCALE - y • @ 0,51% INV, - 40,75 •x (SEE DETAIL) ~ 45,36 I ~ T.D.W. 1~ o ~ • w• I PROPOSED 35 lF +~ry 45,00 0 19 LIVE ' • I (TO BE 44,37 6' PVC (SCH 40) 45,75 savEn) BE ~ OR ADS (N-12) PROPOSED CONCRETE +kry B'' I CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE N®TES~ I, KEYSTONE WALL ALtlNG ka ~ WEST EDGE OF SIDEWALK. TOP - - cm HE saVEn) • ~ • @ 0,51/. FLUME (SEE DETAIL) 45,72 ' SAVED) 'PALM 45.72 45,62 I I DF KEYSTONE WAIL EL. = 44,50 1, SEE CONSTRUCTION NGTES FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, 45,62 2, INSTALLATION OF NDS 1215 INLETS AND PVG PIPING 9' LIVE OAK 3 ~ ' o'LIVE D 45.00 NDS INLET 1212 #2 ~ TO BE INSTALLED AFTER BUILDINGS ARE CONSTRUCTED (TVED) is' T GRATE EL, = 45,00 F.F.E. = 46,25 PROPOSED 68 LF 45,38 a5,3e PROPOSEn RETAINING AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT IS NO LONGER NEEDED ON THE ~ PALM ASH, 46,18 E, INV, = 42.31 46,18 15' RCP @ 0.69% 1~f.~1 - - TO BE W, INV. - 42,31 45,00 I WALL W/42' HANDRAIL SITE, THE NDS 1215 INLETS ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR Lp DESIGN AND PERMITTED HEAVY EQUIPMENT DADS, AVED) ~ 46,18 46,1 NDS INLET 1212 #1 I BY OTHERS (TYP) 3, ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS, EXCEPT PARKING STALLS, W I NDS INLET 1212 #3 8 GRATE EL = 45.00 o~ SHALL BE `ALKYD' THERMOPLASTICS 90 MIL, IN ' I I THICKNESS, ALL STGP BARS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST, > GRATE EL, = 45,00 W. INV, - 42,49 45.75 ' SANITARY SEWER MAIN (TYP) ~ ( E, INV, = 42,13 • XISTING GRATE INLET F,D,O,T, HANDICAP PARKING SPACES SHALL BE MARKED ~ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST1 \ ~ W~ INV. = 42,13 ' N ' ' SANITARY SEWER LATERAL (TYP) x EXISTING 44,58 4618 F PROPOSED TYPE 'D' ARROWS, PARKING STALLS ARE TG BE WHITE ALL AS HALT INDEX NO. 211 45,88 w I GRATE EL, = 45,00 ACCORDING TD CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS, w INV, = 42,00 45J5 M 4s,ea w. INV, = 41,22 4, ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE A EDGE PROTECTION OF OLEPH W/3'x3' RIP-RAP PAD 12' FROM THE EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK, 46,00 45,96 45,84 ( 5, CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ I ~ I 45,63 + • eP ~ . 9 • I 45,50 45,46 45,a4 I I AND PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. g ,~0 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC g} + ~ h. 46,18 45,50 + 45.50 + + + 45,15 I ~ie` GaK ,p• CONTROL DEVICES ON DRUID ROAD AND MARTIN LUTHER + ! fT0 8E I ~ PROPOSED DRAINAGE I 45,79 45,00 45,98 PROPOSED M~E~S, W/5'x5' PALM LP ' 45,98 ~ ~ A,S savEn) SWALE (TYP) KING JR. AVE. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ary• ? <TO BE SODDE?) AND INSPECTED BY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RIP-RAP PAD ~ ~ I 1,25% .2,4 y 46,25 0' 46,01 ' 46Ai I ( I RESOURCES, INC, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF INV,. = 39,50 • • • d ~ (SEE DETAIL) ~ m p o~ 45,00 LP I o~° 45,00 I CONSTRUCTION, 6, ALL NDS INLETS ARE TO BE NDS 1215, w o° 45,90 ~ LP io 46,06 7, ALL ISLANDS AND OPEN AREA AROUND BLDGS ARE TO BE 45,56 TOP OF WALL FILLED AND GRADED SO AS TO BE POSITIVE • m , EL = 45,38 DRAINAGE FOR SURFACE WATER RUNOFF, p b I 46,18 45,75 PROPOSED 30- LF - ExisTING'. Z 45,00 ~ 45,94 8, ALL M.E.S. T7 FIAVE TDE WALL AS PER • 4594 45,38 _ _ - F,DA,T, INDE); NO, 270, 15' RCP @ 0,50% TE • • I T,O,g, 45,94 ARK , OST ~ PROPOSED 33 LF PROPOSED CLEANOUT ~ ~ ~ ' 45,94 I Ih ~ T.D.W. 4618 6' PVC (SCH 40> INV. = 41,86 46,18 46,16 45J5 - OR ADS (N-12) 46.04 PROPERTY LINE 9, ALL HANDICAP RAMPS ARE TU HE EMBOSSED PER 46,04 I a F,D,O,T, INDEX NO. 304, PAGE 1, SAW CUTTING GROOVES IS NOT ALLOWED, PROPOSED DRAINAGE 0, 9% 46,18 PROPOSED RIM EL = @ 3 MATCH PROPOSED PROPOSED CLEANOUT SWALE (TYP) 'PALM INV. - 42.35 I i I 10, ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, Le. PIPES, INLETS, MANHOLES ETC, (TO BE SODDED) tTD BE I GRADE 46,18 PROPOSED 47 LF PROPOSED RIM EL, _ SAVED) ~u 6' PVC (SCH 40) ' ( I ~ MUST MEET F,D,O,T, SPECIFICATIONS, I I 11, CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN DETENTION POND • OR ADS (N-12) MATCH PROPOSED PROPOSED JUNCTION BOX PROPOSED 32 LF GRADE ~ • ~ ~ 6' PVC (SCH 40) @ 0,51% o UNTIL ACCEPTED $Y OWNER AND ENGINEER ' I y OF RECORD, F,DA,T, INDEX NO. 200, 201 • • OR ADS (N-12) eNy I RIM EL = 44,68 i + . + @ 0,50% 46,18 F.F,E, = 46,25 PROPOSED CLEANOUT 44,79 46,62 0 + _ + I I ,oe °O I 12, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC ALONG DRUID S, INV, - .39.65 ~ pp 1 INV, - 42,55 E, INV, = 39,65 a~• ~ 46,36 • I PROPOSED RIM EL = + a +eP' ROAD AND MLK AVE, AS PER F,D,O,T, INDEX (SEE DETAIL), cm eE PROPOSED CLEANOUT ROPOS~)21 LEANOUT MATCH PROPOSED 13, ALL ISLANDS TO BE FILLED TO EDGE I I CONTRACTOR TO TIE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, NDS INLET 1212 #7 SAVED) 46,18 PROPOSED7RIM EL, = GRADE - • • • 19 OAK LP ' PROPOSED RIM EL = 45,38 - I ,1 MATCH PROPOSED GRATE El, - 45,98 ~ 45,98 MATCH PROPOSED 45,36 BUILDING DOWN SPOUTS 14, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EROSION CONTROL INTO PROPOSED CLEANOUT UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT AS DIRECTED S, INV. = 41,84 O I GRADE GRADE PROPOSED 5 LF ~ 6 PVC (SCH 40) • I BY ENGINEER OF RECORD, ~ 46,18 PROPOSED 14 LF OR ADS (N-12) 45,75 15, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE F,D,O,T, TYPE 45,75 I Z 'P' OR "J' STRUCTURE BOTTOM FOR ALL DRAINAGE 46.18 6' PVC (SCH 40) @ 0,54% PROPOSED 37 LF " ° 46,18 OR ADS (N-12) INLETS TO ACCOMMODATE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE, , rc 46,36 @ 0.51% 15 RCP @ 0.46% w 45J5 45,00 46,33 46,21 ~ ~ ~ 16, HANDICAP PARKING AND ACCESS ANGLES SHALL NOT 45,56 45,83 46,21 Z EXCEED L50 (2%) IN ALL DIRECTIONS, . ~ • 45,75 LP • • ' ® 45J5 45,38 ~--A 46,62 EXISTING I 17, THE MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPE IS • 45,99 PROPOSED 29 LF ~ J 146,62 I~ asPHaLT b20 C5%), IF A SIDEWALK HAS A LONGITUDINAL SLOPE / I GREATER THAN 5% A RAMP MUST B U ' 46,52 46,41 ~ E TILIZED, 6' PVC (SCH 40) ~ 45,60 46,52 OR ADS (N-12) , 46,52 • 46,52 4591 I I~ I~ ( 18, THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RAMP SLOPE IS ld2 (8.3%>, • W THE MAXIMUM RISE FORA RAMP IS 30', THE MAX CLEAR @ 1,00% ~ ^'1 46,10 46,00 45,83 45J5 - _ I I WIDTH OF A RAMP IS 36', ALL LANDINGS ON RAMPS '~s 1, 46,20 46,30 CONTRACTOR TO MEET AND _ 45,00 46,20 a I SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 60' (5 FTJ AND THE BOTTOM OF MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK AT = } 45,00 4620 a'~' aya THIS LOCATION p ~ - 45,65 45,28 4620 + + I EACH RAMP SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN 6' OF STRAIGHT AND ~o ~e LEVEL CLEARANCE, IF A RAMP CHANGES DIRECTION AT A 46,30 LP + +ary I a`' a°' LANDING, THE MINIMAL LANDING SIZE IS 5'x5', / ~ + 19, ALL SIDEWALK AND RAMPS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PROPOSED 44 LF 45,89 xryP I I ) BUILDING CODE 2001 INCLUDING ALL AMENDMENTS AND. REVISIONS, 15' RCP @ 0,40% 45'89 46,42 46,01 46,64 20 RAMPS AND LANDINGS WITH DROP-OFFS SHALL HAVE CURBS, 46,64 I WALLS, RAILINGS, OR PROJECTING SURFACES THAT 46,32 45,51 46,11 46,32 46,14 PROPOSED JUNCTION BOX 46,14 45,74 I PREVENT PEOPLE FROM SLIPPING OFF THE RAMP, CURBS F,D,O,T. INDEX NO. 200, 201 PROPOSED CLEANOUT p,73Y, • 3,65% 45,82 0,57/. 45,82 , = 44,89 INV. _ 41,55 - 0,57% 'y~/. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2' HIGH 05~~ i I 21. HANDRAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL RAMPS AND NI INV = 39,82 PROPOSED RIM EL, _ 0 S, INV, = 39,62 MATCH PROPOSED 4500 SIDEWALKS AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING'CODE GRADE 46,35 45'27 46,13 45.58 45,90 LP 45,63 HP 2001 INCLUDING ALL AMENDMENTS AND REVISIONS, 45,90 I I 22, PVC STORM PIPE TO BE SCH, 40 (WHITE) OR ADS (N-12) SMOOTH 46,32 PROPOSED 47 LF 45,82 HF 46,50 WALL RING AND GASKET, 46,00 I I 23, DRAIN COVERS AND GRATES IN DRIVE AISLES MUST MEET 6' PVC (SCH 40) ' OR ADS (N-12> HS-20 SPECIFICATIDNS~ . @ 0,50% PROPOSED KEYSTONE WALL, 46,20 ' 46.50 46.38 DESIGN AND PERMITTED HY OTHERS • 46,00 46,38 I l TOP OF WALL EL, = 46,50 SAW CUT EXISTING EDGE OF 4620 PAVEMENT PRIOR TO h CONSTRUCTIDN OF DRIVEWAY. + + a'~' a~ 46,01 45,62 ' 46,01 + I 46,01 46,01 46,52 PROPOSED TYPED ~e 46,52 46,38 ~ RATE INLET FDA,L s ~ ~ • ~ ° G + o 46,38 4638 b ply ' INDEX NO. 211 ,~0 EXISTING 6' CHAINLINK FENCE 12' LAUREL - GRATE EL, = 45,00 ag -Q- PROPERTY LINE (TO BE + ag' ' -y N, INV, = 40,00 - SAVED) 46,01 ag N,89.03'S2'W, 265,16' PROPOSED +ati' E, INV, = 4125 T,O,W, ~ * PROPOSED RETAINING 7' BaK WALL W/42' FENCE, EXISTING PROPOSED 25 LF ENLARGER (TYP) PROPOSED CLEANOU APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GATE VALVE 8` PVC (SCH 40) W/2'X2' CONCRETE PROPOSED CLEANOUT (TO BE W/2'x2' CONCRETE PAD SAVED) DESIGN AND PERMITTED ~ yy EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING OR ADS (N-12) INV, = 42,30 FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING @ 0,69% PROPOSED 25 LF PROPOSED RIM EL, INV, = 42,30 ~ / / TOP OF WALL HY OTHERS (TYP) EL = 4538 i " ~ 4 ~ ~ i PROPOSED RIM EL, _ r - , ~ I ~ 1 ST, PROPOSED 47 LF 6' PVC (SCH 40) MATCH PROPOSED ~g 1a g MASONRY NDS INLET 1212 #5 PAVEMENT' MATCH PROPOSED C~ 0) PAVEMENT' ae• ag• agh g° 6' PVC (SCH 40) GRATE EL = 45,00 OR ADS (N-12) } + + OR ADS (N-12) N, INV, = 42,05 @ 0,69% rygg PROPOSED EROSION ~ ~ ! ~g i ~ i~ @ 0.50% ,1+ S. INV, = 42.05 ASPHALT o +a a",~~ a"" (SEE RD TAIL)) ~ J~~ 1 ~ L~t~~ C tJ + + ' ~ ~.-.x t ~ I~ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF any PROPOSED DRAINAGE EXISTING 12' WATERMAIN EX[STWG PROPOSED 55 LF SWALE (TYP) TOP OF WALL ASPHALT 10' PVC (SCH 40) (TO HE SODDED) EL, = 45,38 IDP OF WALL / ~ ~ a r OR ADS (N-12) - - - _ :L, = 4538 ~ ''ti",,"o ~~C~IIFdt~ ? ;~°JF! ~t't ~ I ~l ,i; d ~ t;I„f f'F t~I,k~l~` lfj~p i(:R=~ a ~ '^,'1 _ PROPOSED 39 LF ..,.I _ ` @ 0,69% ~ i NDS INLET 1212 #4 6` PVC CSCH 40) -l PROPOSED 25 LF GRATE EL, = 45,00 CONTRACTOR TO MEET AND PROPOSED 47 LF 6' PVC (SCH 4W N, INV. = 42,52 OR ADS (N-12) @ 0,54X qq ~'I MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK AT 12' PVC (SCH 40) BEGIN RETAINING • THIS LOCATION OR ADS (N-12) ~ WALL W/42' FENCE, OR ADS (N-12) S, INV, = 42,52 Illf 1 ~ 2U~5 - @ 0,69% DESIGN AND PERMITTED @ 0,51/. BY OTHERS, (TYP) - I PROPOSED KEYSTONE WALL, 4 / DESIGN AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS, S, TOP OF WALL EL, 46,25 ,.,~~r~~~ „ M1~~ .M~? a ~4. CLIENT: PROJECT NAME: SEC. 15 TWP.29S RNG. 15E PROJECT NO. DATE BY REVISIONS mzoos ®2003 by Professional DRAWING TYPE DESIGNIab; SHEET NUMBER Engine Engineering Resources, Inc. DRAINNF,,16Y~ NUMBER All Rights Reserved CHECIfo s DRUID /o InOUp1i 1 I/YI[~pydpD All Ri cLEAawArER. L.L.C. THE U T Y ~ o3-~a6o The herein The arrangements depicted DATE herein are the sole property PEE It ? PRELIMINARY of Professional Engineering ® CONSTRUCTION V 0 / Resources, Inc. and may not PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. ~ ~/~1~~ ~c~? es ou 1992 SOUTH MISSOURI $AbE, SUITE 106 SCALE R PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN be rep CLEARW,4TER, FLT JJ756 ~~~~0, I 2 7-12-05 SAG REVISED PLAN AS PER CITY [IF CLEARWATER COMMENTS. 6-20-09 SAG REVISED PLAN AS PER SWFWND COMMENTS. ~thOU be reproduced in any form 646 94th AVE. NORTH ST. PETERSBUIRG, FL. 33702 ? RECORD P without its written permission CIVIL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, PERMIT EXPEDITORS (727) 576-2007 PAUL V. 'SHERMA REGst:`NO. 35628 - - tq„ CONTRACTOR TO FILL AND AS PROPOSED 42' GRADE FROM EDGE DF PAVEMENT WEST HIGH FENCE TO RETAINING WALL ELEVATION, PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 6' EXISTING 4' VERTICAL CURB CONCRETE SIDEWALK 46,35 WEST PROPERTY LIN TO BE SODDED PROPOSED (TYP,) ~ CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TO HE SODDED) (TO BE REMOVED) (TO BE REMOVED) PROPERTY LINE @ p PROPOSED 1 I 19' 24' 19' EXISTING MARTIN LUTHER PROPOSED F,D,O,T, KING JR. AVE, PAVEMENT 3' DROP CURB, MEET AND MATCH A ROPOSED DECK PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING GRADE I I PARKING ISLE PA PROPOSED 48' BUILDING RKING ALUMINIUM (F,D,O,T, INDEX N0, 300) ~ 1,50' MIN, ASPHALT PAVEMENT, AT PROPERTY LINE SPACE SPACE 0 HIGH FENCE e~ r® ® ® TYPE S-1 ~ w~ - ~ 50 YR, EL= 44,86 PROPOSED PAVEMENT pROPOSED EXISTING 4 9 F,F,E, PROPOSED (SEE DETAIL) WHEEL STOP CONCRETE SIDEWALK 25 YR, EL= 44,53 I I WHEEL STOP EROSION CONTROL :OL per, ~ ® EXISTING GRADE Io TOP OF BANK I (SEE DETAIL) EL. 45,00 I WATER QUALITY p El= 41,93 p • `7 ~ ~ _,,,i 36~ : ~ PROPOSED A , ~!a• °•Q, • p(~~.,,°'4• . ® 4,1 HORIZ. TO 1 VERT, e I :y a SLOPE, fT0 BE SODDED) 11=1 i 1=1 i 1=1 i 1=III=1 i 1=1 I I -1 i 1=1 i =1 i 1= i 1=i I ' „J -III=III-III=111_I~_III_ I_III-III II~II~ -III =III=III=T ' ' ~ ~ 0 . _ _ II_I11=III=111_ ~4•• -~'~r`r_~--, =iii=ll :III- ;III,~~IIII III lil'_,_-__ _ _ _ ~~I_I'fi-7_I~i-11_TI„ ?~t- DETENTION POND IL,~I ~i~1=1~=1 ~ . I{iii-III. _ _ COMPACTED CLEAN FILL -III- ~-1 ~ I I- ~ CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT / - _ ~ • ;III. BOTTOM EL,- 41,52 (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FOR ' EROSION CONTROL II = _ COMPACTION REQUIREMENT) ! EXISTING ASPHALT TO FORM / / ~_I ~ _ - ~ , ' A STRAIGHT EDGE, CONTRACTOR _ V - ~ ' CSEE DETAIL) 1L~I1- APPROXIMATE COMPACTED CLEAN FILL 1 4,1 -111- EXISTING GRADE (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FOR TO MEET AND MATCH / I I _ - - ~ ~ I ` EXISTING PAVEMENT, (TYP) i y / _ - _ III- ~ ~ ~ I _ I ~ _ ~ I I I` ~ -Ili. COMPACTION REQUIREMENT ` PRpPOSED CENTER LINE ~ " OF DRAINAGE SWALE CSEE GRADING PLAN FOR TO BE SODDED - - - - - - - PROPOSED RETAINING WAL . PROPOSED ELEVATIONS) (TYP) (DESIGN AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS) PROPOSED RETAINING WALL _ - (DESIGN AND PERMITTED ~ 1=III-11I-11I-111_1 I L`-I I ICI I I III-I ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ BY OTHERS) ' ~ -III- ~ ~ ~ ~ . .II I-1 11=1I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I rl I I=III=11 I=1 I I=1 _III=111=1 I I=1 I I=1 I 6' MINIMUM CRUSHED CONCRETE (GRADED AGGREGATE) 9' MINIMUM COMPACTED SUBGRADE LBR = 40 AND COMPACTED TO 98% MEETING F,D,O,T, SPECIFICATIONS 204, OF MAXIMUM DENSITY T-180 _ .II I-1 I IJ I ~I I _II I-1 I II I I.I I I-1 I I. S,H,W, EL= 37,00 CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THE CRUSHED CONCRETE COMPACTED CLEAN FILL IS FREE OF DELETERIOUS, FRIABLE OR ORGANIC (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FOR 6' F,D,O,T, NO, 57 STONE MATTER WHEN IT IS DELIVERED TO THE SITE, COMPACTION REQUIREMENT) IT SHOUD CONSIST ONLY OF CRUSHED CONCRETE AND BE FREE BRICKBATS (BURNT, RED-CLAY, BRICKS) AS WELL. CROSS-SETIO - I - C CONTRACTOR TO FILL AND PROPOSED 6' SOUTH VERTICAL CURB PROPERTY LINE GRADE FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO RETAINING WALL ELEVATION, PROPOSED 4' PROPOSED NORTH ' (TD HE SODDED) CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK TOP OF HANK PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 4' NORTH CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 6' (T0 BE REMOVED) 01 PROPOSED 48' 19' 24' EL. 45,00 VERTICAL CURB 4269 ® 55 (TO BE REMOVED) PROPOSED F,D,O,T, ® ALUMINIUM PROPOSED PROPOSED HIGH FENCE PARKING ISLE BUILDING BUILDING MEET AND MATCH EXISTING DRUID 3' DROP CURB, SPACE 6 EXISTING GRADE ROAD PAVEMENT (F,D,O,T, INDEX N0, 300) ~ PROPOSED PAVEMENT A AT PROPERTY LINE F,F,E, F,F,E, (TO BE SODDED)(TYP) PROPOSED (SEE DETAIL) 50 YR, EL= 44,86 s WHEEL STOP 25 YR, EL= 4453 EXISTING 4' ~ ~ ~ . . • . EROSION CONTROL CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) ® ; . WATER QUALITY ® I I0 'd ~ ~ .p . ~ ; ..a • :~10 ~ . ~d . e EL- 41,93 - _ _ . ` k• ICI I I-1 I ~I -1 i 1=1 i ~~=1 i 1=i I _I i 1=1 i rl i 1=1 i 1=i I =1 I1=1 I I-1 I I-1I 11=111-111-III- ° ;III-III-III; 1,;,111,;,111,_-,111;;,111,_ I,~~III_IT_I=III=111_ 11:,=III-III, 11= ® a 'r - _111=III=III=11 I - --4_.~~,_~~,-..~ - - a • • ~ • ~ ~ ' _III-III-III-1ih~~-,__ ~ -11: ~~=1 I I-1 I I_„III-III-I ~ I- ~ ~i-1 ~ I'~I I I I .I 11=" - ' -I~~II(-11 i~~lll-III_ II _ ..I I; APPROXIMATE - EXISTING GRADE -III: PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CENTER LINE COMPACTED CLEAN FILL _III J1 CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT ~ ~ ~ / ~~-III-III- ~ ~ I EXISTING ASPHALT TO FORM ~ ~I I I- EXISTING GRADE (DESIGN AND PERMITTED OF DRAINAGE SWALE COMPACTED CLEAN FILL PROPOSED CENTER LINE (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FOR .III-~ 4,1 EROSION CONTROL BY OTHERS) CSEE GRADING PLAN FOR (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FOR OF DRAINAGE SWALE COMPACTION REQUIREMENT) (SEE DETAIL) A STRAIGHT EDGE, CONTRACTOR / TO MEET AN? MATCH / III= III- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS) COMPACTION REQUIREMENT) (SEE GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING PAVEMENL (TYP) ~ / I ~ -~I I-~ ~ ~ LBR INI40MANDMC0MPACTEDHTOA98% COMPAC ED CLEAN FILL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS) TO BE SODDED PROPOSED CENTER LINE T OF DRAINAGE SWALE (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FO P S (TYP) CSEE GRADING PLAN FOR • / / / I I- I ~ ~ OF MAXIMUM DENSITY T-180 COMPACTION REQUIREMENT PRO O ED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS) (DESIGN AND PERMITTED i_iii ii_-1 PROPOSED BY OTHERS) .-III-1 III: 4.1 HORIZ, TO 1 VERL 1=III==1 =1 ~ SLOPE, (TO BE SODDED) COMPACTED CLEAN FILL 6' MINIMUM CRUSHED CONCRETE (GRADED AGGREGATE) (SEE TESTING SCHEDULE FOR MEETING F,D,O~T, SPECIFICATIONS 204, COMPACTION REQUIREMENT) CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THE CRUSHED CONCRETE DETENTION POND IS FREE OF DELETERIDUS, FRIABLE OR ORGANIC MATTER WHEN IT IS DELIVERED TO THE SITE, ® ® BOTTOM EL. 41.52 C SS SECTI S.H.W, EL= 37,00 IT SHOUD CONSIST ONLY OF CRUSHED CONCRETE AND BE FREE BRICKBATS (BURNT, RED-CLAY, BRICKS) AS WELL, s- Tl - ' 2'-3~rn 8 4'-1' NOTkS~ 6' 3'-r 6` 1. Type „A„ .Aggregate: SKIMMER (SEE DETAIL 'A'> SKIMMER FILTER AGGREGATE FOR UNDERDRAINS SHALL CONSIST OF WASHED MATERIAL MEETINI (SEE DETAIL 'A') ROAD & BRIDGES SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILICA SAND & QUARTZ GRAVEL CONTAINING L MATERIAL MEETING F,D,O,T, 1,95' ~ THAN i % (BY WEIGHT) OF SILT, CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER. SAID MATERIAL SHALL 'AVEL CONTAINING LESS tiID MATERIAL SHALL HAVE NORTH A 2 -0, UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT OF 1,5 OR GREATER AN EFFEC V TI E GRAIN SIZE OF 0,20 - A r-iOP OF SKIMMER MILLIMETER AND SIEVE ANALYSIS CIN PERCENT OF TOTAL WEIGHT PASSING) AS FOLI EL,= 44,85. dN SIZE OF 0,20 - 0,55 PROPERTY LINE f PASSING) AS FOLLOWSi 3/8' = 95 -100% o'>ke a N0, 4 = 95 - 100% ' ho o e N0,8=85-100% .I ~ H m c , • . • . GRATE EL, 44,85 NO. 16 = 65 - 97% N0, 30-25-70% - - , , ; . ; . I i : , ; ~ ; , /8'x2-!/2' S,S, BOLT ND. 50 = 5 - 35"/. :.I. • : • : • : I I (TYP,) NO, 100 = 0 - 7% . . ; • 0 I i I ; : NO, 200 = MAX, 2% :~I:•:•:•: i I •'•I•:•: • '~I••'•'•' L--U 1 SLOT BOTTOM THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE FREE OF ORGANIC MATTER AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATE DELETERIOUS MATERIALS, GREGATE, PERMEABILITY ' '•I'~'•'•' 0 0 EL,= 41,93 WASHED SHELL & LIMEROCK SHALL NOT BE USED FOR FILTER AGGREGATE, PERMEABI 4'x3-1/2'x5/16' '~I'~'~'~' OF THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE 3,5 FT/HR, MINIMUM, GAL, ANGLE IRON ••I•••••'• BOTTOM OF SKIMMER •:I•:•:•:•:• :•:'I:•:~ EL, 41,43 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE ' TYPE C 6. 6. STEEL GRATE ;::;L; :I:.;. PROPERTY LINE TOP OF POND PROPOSED SWALE EL= 45,00 ® Straight 8ors 2"x a FLTER C ® MEET AND MATCH ~ . ~ LOTH EXISTING GRADE PL~~ alE~ RetlcuNne ears r# x (AMOCO PROPEX AT PROPERTY LINE gQ~ ~ x ~ FABRIC 2000) ~d PRgROSED CENTER LINE Approx. Weight !00 l,bs. :D SOD OF DRAINAGE SWALE TYPE A AGGREGATE PROPOSED SOD (SEE GRADING PLAN FOR SLD WIDTM = 0,39' pp?~1'I ~ ~ . (AS PER NOTE NO, 1> Et/ O ® NO SOD IS ALLOWEB (FILTER BED) I PROPOSED ELEVATIONS) ~ I OVER ROCK MEDIA e, TOP OF BANK 3,00' TREATMENT LEVEL EL,= 45~OD EL, = 41,93 -J 1 4,1 EROSION CONTROL I - BOTTOM OF POND 4 3 3/4' 3-3/4' EL, = 41,52 CENTER LINE OF (SEE DETAIL) I F,D,O,T, NO, 57 9 2-1/4' STONE PROPOSED SWALE, SEE PAVING, GRADING AND 0 2,00' 2-1/4' 3/e' GALV, PLATE - - - - - - O 0 0 EL = 41,93 _III_ SKIMMER SKIMMER 0 41,93 DRAINAGE PLAN-FOR PROPOSED ELEVATION, (SEE DETAD_ 'A') 0 y:". : • • : , 00 0 _ -~9- • • ao EL, - 41,52 _ i. ~ - ~ ~ 3x3-1/2 x5/16' 0 O 0 U M 00000 4' ADS W/SOCK 41,52 GALV, ANGLE IRON FLTER CLOTH a s 0 0 ~-n,~;., 0 0 i- GRATE 4x3 1/2 x5/16 0 0 0 0 o (360' PERFORATION) TOP OF SKIMMER GALV, ANGLE IRON 4, (AMOCO PROPER 00 0000 ; ' • ~ 0 0 INV, = 40,85 IS W/SOCK PERFORATION) EROSION CONTROL EL,= 44,85 ALL EDGES TO BE ROUNDED FABRIC 2000) 0 0 0 . ` ; 0 O 0 = 40,85 (SEE DETAIL) ~ EL, = 40,60 ' PROPOSED GRATE EL,= 44,65 u~i FILTE N 40,60 FILTER FABRIC .d.'~' (AMOCOR 4545) ° ~ TOP OF STRUCTURE PROPOSED 1' (TYP,) - II iu F,DA,T, NO, 57 6' 1,52' 2' 1' 4,1 HORIZ, TO 1 VERT. q SLOT BOTTOM POND BOTTOM EL. 41,52 • u ~ STONE SLOPE, (TD BE SODDED) I .Q PIPE INV, El, 41,93 (TO BE SODDED) Q M STORM EL. 3994 3/8'x2-1/2' S,S, BOLT ' - DRAINAGE PIPE ~ ~ ~ BOTTOM OF SKIMMER @ 9. O,G (TYP,) ~ . ~ EL; 41,43 d SIDE DRAIN 2 1 TOP OF TREATMENT EL, 41,93 i ' c •d 12' SMOOTH FINISH HOT OF TREATMENT EL, 41,52 VOL OF TREATMENT (CF) 2,904,0 • d EL,= 40,93 Q d •d 4 •d S,H,W, EL,= 37,OD S,H,W,L, EL 37,0 4 4• -iii-i I i-iii i i-i i i- Q• III-III=III III.I ~ 8 FILTER BED HEIGHT (FT) 1,33 • ' :III-1I I-1 I I- I IJ I I= FILTER BED DEPTH (FT) 2 FILTER HED LENGTH (FT) 49,0 _ - " a q 1/4` WELD - - - - - - UNDERDRAIN INVERT (FT) 40,85 • . e' EL= 36,50 ~ EACH SIDE • a' ~ • ~ ~a• a a. ' PROPOSED 6' FILTER FABRIC CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT 2'x2'x6' o v BOTTOM OF SKIMMER EL, THICK CONCRETE PAD CENTERED DETAIL A ETEI~TI CONCRETE GROUT ON BLEED DOWN SLOT W/ WWM OR FIBER MESH, :TRII P~i~°,AT EI • 40 @ 9` O,C,E,W, !E AID TII~. PROPOSED 4' UNDERDRAIN = T TI1~ POND sc~LE INV. 40,65 SCALE ®1'® 2' II 12 2005 TFLL T E S UT ETIL SECTION A A >>a r CLIENT: PROJECT PROJECT NAME. SEC. 15 rwP. 29S RNG. 15E NO. DATE BY REVISIONS ®2002 b ® 2002 by Professional DESIGIU%; flS'-' "F~S%S SHEET Engineer Engineering Resources, Inc. DRAWING TYPE DRAWLS YQ NUMBER All Righ DRUID COURTYARD NUMBER All Rights Reserved CHECIGED; OY tPV--P 03-1460 The am THE L;L)qoRTYAmLj The arrangements depicted DATE ; C ARWATERg L .L.C. of Profe herein are the sole property ? PRELIMINARY , of Professional Engineering 0 CONSTRUCTION ~~b ur 1112 SOUTH MISSOURI AVE, SUIT herein t E 106 SCALE Resources, Inc. and may not PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES, INC. r CLEARWATER, e 33756 Resource PAVING, S, ARWATER COMMENTS, be repro GRADING 1~ 7-12 -05 G without AGE DETAILS AG REVISE PLAN AS P be reproduced in any form 646 94th AVE. NORTH ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33702 ? RECORD without its written permission CIVIL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, PERMIT EXPEDITORS (727) 576-2007 ]PAUL V. SI EE?&Pi A•,REG. ''N0. 35628 NIT. S, CITY OF CLE N . 1 6-20-05 SAG REVISE PLAN AS PER SWFWMD COMMENTS, SEC. 1.5 , TWP. 2.9S., RNG. 15 E. LEGEND: A C NDITIONER ~PD LOW PREVENTER DEVICE • T ~K wpb. • 4 M` ~ ~UI~ENTL ~~s~ NC. NNCE~ S10N pY~,,~}~~,;a ~~NT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION at,~ti e R ~;~~~~~~a C RCORPORATION ii t„' C. ``gin USINESS I W.L. A WATER LINE r ~(POwERa DGEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM LIOHTPOLE RCS .B.BOOK. ~ vn . 0' 20' 40' .F ~ ~~ME~CEMENT k ENCY D p pIS SCALE: 1" = 20' CED CONCRETE PIPE F WAY ;a s~ Y , ~i? EPARTMENT r SURVEYOR AND MAPPER'S REPORT: z; ~~s. p. ~ 1. N0 UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS NOTED. ~ 2 NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS RIGHT OF WAY, ANDIOR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. . $ D SECTION 3: ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS X 0.00 s= L RoN PIPE 4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH, 5. THE LOCATION OFUNDERGROUNp FOUNDATIONS WAS NOT DETERMINED OR MEASURED ON THIS SURVEY. s r~ A! '~N li k p4. i. ti, I:C d~' InT. it I , r R. 4... '.:A: ~ k~) Iq ~ i - S, ,j~' T ~ ~ ~f s t~ a: w vr; 'oV,: },Y Y ~ `'6Y _ j:. ~ ~ _ 5j ti i'h ~S !~~5 - .3 i 'T, ~ - ~ BOt]NDARY SURVEY OF: ~ ~ ~ A portion of land in the Southwest'/< of Section15 Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas ;County, Florida, described as follows; `Starting at the Northwest corner of the Southeast'/ of the Southwest'/ of said Section 15; run ~ S.89°03'52"E., along the 40 acre line 295.1.6 feet; thence S.00°04'38"W., 295.16 feet; thence .w N.89°03'52"W.; 295.16 feet; thence N.00°04'38"E., 295.16 feet to the Point of Beginning; LESS ;the North 30.00 feet and LESS the West 34.00 feet for road right-of way. FOR• TAM Group CERTIFIED T0: TAM Group ~ ~ ~ U I I~ FLOOD INFORMATION: Flood Zone:. X Community Panel No.: 12103C0108G Effective Date:. September 3, 2003 • BASIS OF BENCHMARK: j~~ Deslgnatlon: HARRIS U • Elevation; 40.021 NAVD 1988 DATUM ~~Y 19 205 ORDER N0.2004-s2. ~[.~~l1~~~4G DE~ARTf~E~I~ February 19, 2004 - BoundarylTOpo C~~A~~~~E~ April 20, 2005-Revised Description/ Added Easements , , DESIGN; • B0II16~PURT' ?'OP'06?"PIMC C. FRED EUE WORK ORDER N0. 2004-62.2 DRAWN; CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS - LAND PLANNERS J• ~7 Ulf O'~L'i ! ~ ~.5,,..- DATE: 4-20-2005 ST. PETERSBURG • ZEPHYRHILLS CLE FLORID RVEYOR'S: REGISTRATION, NO. 827 SCALE: 1" _ '20' CLEARWATER FLORIDA FLORIDA ENGINEER'S. REGISTRAMON NO. SHEET NO. 1 OF 1 IREV,# DATE REVISION BY REV. DATE REVISION BY CHECKED; i uWWweYUn::::'.:w.:.iy,..~,~'... JW.,: YYY1,Y4,,.-... i~;s~`~'''~.ai._u~~:.:.~.<... ....•:...._.:L'.:.:_.:i~...-~..:.L.....,...ru41$:::yh,t,L:,i~,~Yi.i.: LS'Y:W4yGY~ - - ..,...d'J:'07~i' LBui1YYS11";~,S.a7.- ,.....~wm.•,e~,n~~~n ~ . : L. (=lG EfN I ~ , ~Z~ . ; :~PROPUSEI) ~ ' EXI~''IhG DGE OF : , . 'NORTH _ _ ' ; v Vg1EK N ~ IVEWAY. r FIRE Pf r , Pf?UI'OSEU 93 LF Rtw kCCLAIM ~.ATER MAIN: -•,M- 18' RCP e 0 76% I ' CONTRACTOR TO TAPER J f~f.liUCFh, =•I~ AND CURB.Tp SIDEWALK AND - . PUR,RY BLOWOFF - -I 'TCM ,JACK A7 NT (TYP) ' •P^nCPOSED TYPE 'D' ' OR PAVEME 'FIRE HYL"•~NT. G^n',TE ]tJLET F,D:O,T, GATE V. L'/E'.(GV, 6 BOX) _ ~ ~ IIJIC,( NO 211 ~ ~ ~ GF.~,IE F.L,,=-40:27 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1if, '~SIAMCSIG:INNECTION''~ --.--d MEET.AND; CONTRACTCR TO PROVIDE 2% : S,' 1NV;: = 36,50 ~ L`CUULE ~uLCK ASSEMBLY,', - -',~~1 CURB MGXIMUM CROSS-SLOPE AT DR[VEVAY LOCATION, _ m ~.'ATQR ,'L'ER" l~- . ss~y~-~ SANITARY SEVER 11NE + _ss-+ - - , - . lITA~'.Y SEWER,FORCEMA , {`$nN]TARY.SEVER MANHOLE', W 1J 'CLEAN EJT - - -O ' ~.o~=..c STORM L,t IN sip c C ~ ~ ' • ROOF D A1V ' , c ~ ' h° 9 ~ GRATE I lLET . ' ' °h EXISTING +°e } ? }+h ASPHALT } ~ JUNCTIL! BOX',. PROPOSED 27 LF,' • EROSIDtJ C.7NTROl ct c, ci o ° l8''RCP 2.0,76/.. ? ' CUTFALL STRUCTURE [f. ~ : : ~ J9 ~ ; MITERED ENO SECTION.(M.ES> ~JJ ° °ry1 ,'~'F. ,TUP. OI BANK T'-~-~- • 7 E x ~ , ~ ~ - - gSEMEi 1 0R'L ETBACK ' ND .RETAINING WALL; F E . - I'. CONTRACTOR TO'TRANSITION, TRAFFIC'.FLOV ARROV C~ •EZISTtNG~ ' ' RETAINING WALL'TO EXISTING ` ~ ~ `•~••srOP• ~ SIDEWALK ELEVATION:W[TH1N ~ 'H~NDIG' PARKING SPACE:( ' 'I,, LAST:15' OF" WALL, Al/V~V' H.P;°DR CMaNGE IN SLOPE Hin ( n ~ I I o-- UO; UIIDERL 11 ! N/A r~C: 1250 01 I x75 : I ~ ~ ~ Xi POVERNG • ,,.y...w.vj~.y ' ~ . t , . ' -I- LIGHT.PULE ELEVAT 4, - ~ ~w.r , _ I CONTOU 9A 1 s _ _ ~1 1 ' : FDO:TSINIIEXNNO~OOO,0201 : ~CONTIIiiCTOR'1'O:CAI,L. ~SUNSff1NE" AT 1100-~3?-4770 , t • k 42,69. 44,24 ~ _ I: - :RIM EL. '..42,32. ~r ' ~ 1 I ~ , N INV, =.36,70. 48 hrs;`PR10f~:T0 AIIY CLE11ftING OR CO~aZ1iCLlION 4352'. s W, INV,'= 36,70 ~ ~,,,.,,w ~ ::T, ~ ,I':: FOR' EXISTINC<U'Tll~'1'r' LOCATIONS.:: . ' . ~ ~ r~ ~ ' M 44,26 44,26 w ~ ~ I \ 1 4336 1ri .43,76- jj ~ ~0', 10 O .~0 'I O' ~ 44.14' 1 ~ ~ } 4414 4414 i TUP OF WhI,L' j , 4414 I ' EL` = 4311 _ ~ L ~ I / 4562 I GI~I~PHIC SCALE i ~ . 1 45b2 l?~~ x5,38 ~'r" T.0 W, ~ ~ ' 45,00 h ~ .'45.72 I' + - f L 'SEE CUNSTRUCTIUIJ' NUTES FGR ADDITIONAL 'LUTES • I ' 'I' I '2t IN$TALLATIUN UF: fJll$ 1'15 INLETS AND PV(;' PIi'ING ~ ,i - _ T.a:BE INSTALLED`~FTER I;UILDINGS ,ARE CUTSTRUCTED 453e : ; / ' " ',-;AND HEAVY EQUIEI•;ENT,dS NU LUNGER NEEDI`II:.UN THE:.;' • { , ~ :PROPOSED TYPE D'. ,SITE THE' NDS i?15 IN1 EfS'ARE NUT DE$iGriEb FOR ~ GRATE .1NCET F,D,O;T, ~ • ' 211..; HEAVY..EOUIPME,IJT LUAD;, : < . . f INDEX NO. , ° I~, GRATE El,;'= 45:0.0: 3, ALL PAVEMENT Mt;Ri;IN(,',;; EXCEPT PARKING: STr1LL5 ' { ~ II `w. INV, =.41,zz.. ...SHALL' BE 'nLKYD',~'IIICktTUPCASIICS 90. MIL, IN. . I { ~ : THICKNESS};-ALL i'IUP !'A~:S,: PAVEMENT Mt 'KINGS `:ARRUWS, PARKING :>TACLS ARE TU:BE.WHITf:, ALL ' II P S J`: EzlsT.; PRO D EIi RETAINING _ -HANDICAP:PARKIN,.-'~,PAGI:S SHALL: BE MART D:.` Asri I,I • I WALL W/42' HANDRAIL, 4s,as ~ k;. I ~ 'AGCURDIN6 ,TU C11'r OF GLEARWATER REOU1 i:ME.N ~ S 45:aa : i; x~ ) YSO HERSDCrYFM1TrED 4 -,'AL'L $1DEWALKS ~ I;;LL J.,AVE-.A;EDGE PRUT:C:7IU', OF . I; ~ % I. T " 12'z FRAM .TI lE ED('> OF :II.iE''.SIDEWALK, 46,oD a5,96 : 458a ~ 5,' CpNTRACTUR TU t;.I"f [FY CITY 0E CLEARWAI,:R.. 45.50 45,46 45 a4 AND P.RUFFSSI[1tJn!' FNGU+f•ER1NG RF.SI]URCE'., INf,. q. ~ ,~rr.,<r,<. 1~ , , -o:, ' . 4B.HUURS 11J Ally%•!JLE.I:i" INSTALLATION Uf' 1:nAl f"lC } + ; J CONTROL .DEVICES .GN D';.IJ(D RUAI) rANI). MAR 1N LUTHER ~ : / / } I PROPOSED DRAINAGE. ' j ;`I*. } SWALE (TYP) 'KING JR, AVE TRr~['FIC ~.U'JTRUL DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED' 45,98 i +h> r~ •s~ ~ :I : (TD'BE SODDED) `AND INSPECTED BY.PRUt.SSIONAL:ENGINEERING' ' '46,D1 I J' ~RESUURCES;:.INC f~RIpR jp COMMENCEMENT fF..:: ; ? 'CpNS.TRUCTIUN , •t 6;:ALl.•NDS`•.1NLETS nKE TU .]E'!NDS 1215, 70P. OF . qLL ' ///i 7~•` ALL• ISLANDS AND OPEN Ai'EA; ARUUND;BLD~iS ARE TU• BE 46,06- . ~ EL = 45:3 45:56 ~ ~ EIL'LED AND GRADED SO ~1S"TO BE POSITIVE ;,`:M' :j, ~ ~ DRAINAGE; FUR SUf•;F,ACE~: WATER RUNgFF. / ! :i f ` . I as,3e - B ;.ACC M E S .'TO HAVE TOE .1~~ALL AS PER: ~ • c 45.94 E,D,U T, ' INDEX NU ; ` ' 45.94 270 r,: 9, ALL HANDICAP RN;P$ AF'f: TO'DE EMBUSSED RER' 46,04 /;F~ / I j,'J,. I~ PROPERTY LINE `F-~DJU.T~-INDEX-N0,-304-PaGE-1', SAW-CUTTING,..-~. _ _ { / f BSI IY ~IN E'' GROOVES .`]S-, NqT; ACLOW~? • r ~ : ' ~ 10 :.,ALL DRAINAGE •STRUCTUI~ :3,: I,e PIPES,':INLETS; MANHOLES ETC : 'MUST,MEE_T:F,DU,T,:SPEC!CICATIUNS, , ' IR n' SUBB~4SIN a ^ I F~TA]IJ DETENT]UN PdND : I1 C~NTRACTUR T 1 ' I ~ U Nz3Y i f,°; , N L~NT1L' ACCEPTED ' UWl,f.n AND ENGINEER R .1. • OF' 'RECUR?,' - ` - ~ i 6. '12,, CONTRACTOR TO Pf~UVIDC MAINTENANCE' OF TRAFFIC ALONG, DRU(D. ; +hl ~ +`b ~ ;'ROAD,AN.D,M1.K 'AVE,.AS'.:P`r:R F,DA:T: INpEX'(SEE DETAIL), L,', - I ~ / + 13 : `Alt ISLANDS TU rE; FILL ED TU EDGE ' t ' I i +•cl,~i ~ CONI`RACTgR TO TIE ' ' Df PAVEMENT ,UNLESS Uf fiERW,]SE . NOTED ' 1 ~ 45:3s / • . BuILDiNG DOWN. SPOUTS 14. ` CONTRAGT~R: TU. RC140VE .EROSION GONTRUL • I ~ ~ INTO PROPOSED CLEANOUT UPON COMPLETION GF'PRUJECT pS DIRECTE? i. , OF RECJ]RL ` % ~ BY ENGINEER - . 'I ' 15, ,CONTRACTOR` TO'P12UVI?E F,DA,T, TYPE. 45.75 U 'P` DR ',I' STRUC.IURE 1,•U'iTOM FOR,'ALI:DRAINAGE I INLETS TTJ;•A000M!'(1DATE STORM DRAINAGE• Pl,f?E, F 46,21 . r I 16:; HANDICAP' PARKING. AND< ACCESS ANGLES SHALL.:NUT ,.46;33 I' ~ 'EXCEED,!150''(2%)`1tJ;ALL:'IIIRECTIONS, - '45,59. ~ 45,83 4621 rt ~ ~ ;T Ezlsrr:.~ " " 17;`•THEMAXIMUM LOtJG1~T'UDINAL'SIDEWACK.SLOP <.IS • 46.62 d li G AsPH,_r '.;120 (5/.>.,: 1F A SIDEWALK HAS _A'LONGITUD,NAC SLOPE • r/~. " '`GREATER-',THAN 5% A''.RANP MUST .BE UTILIZED:' 4652 46,41 Y / if ~ •1B, 'THE MAXIMUM ALLQWABLE.RAMP SLUPE':IS 112.(83/) • }6:52 A5.91 ~ I ~ ~ . - W E MAXIMUI4 RISE FOR i1 RAMP; I$` 90 , TIJr:-:MAX CLEAR , TH _ { ~ ,WIDTH OE' A' RAM,~'IS, 3L'. ACL LANDINGS f.,N P.,1"PS ~III ! ~,SHALL~,BE NOT. LESS THnN 60, d5 T'TJ AN? .THE 3UTTOM` OF ~f ' L ~/i;; _ . , ,.EACH RAMP, SHALL HAVE t10T LESS:: THAN, 6" Ui'~ STRAIGHT At,D < , +~o f ~ ,~y :'LEVEL CLEARANCC'.• IF n.RAMP: CHANGES DI:ECTIGN AT. A 'iz } {///;;;;';,;+h ,p'. , LANDING, `'THE 'MIIVIMAL:.L~aNDING SIZE ~IS 5:<.S',' ( ~ } I ~ 19,:~AGL'SIDEWALK Al;!?'~RQhIP~S~SHALL. COMPLY.~~a~1TN THE FEORI?A ~ ti ;i BUILDING."CODE 20J1'INCL.UDING::ALL AMENDIr::NT:i AN?.`REVISIL.I:S: " 20'.~ RAMPS AND;,LAND(IJG$. WITH ;DROP-OFFS' SHP:~`L` HAVE°CURBS, - 4u 64 { ~i' I , :.',WALLS, ;RAILING IaR F:i]JECTING; SURFAC l;lni ' '5...14 { 4534 I. { PREVENT ^PEOPCE f"f~OM SLIPPING OFF .THE t'At•1j' CURBS : ~ SHALL BE'.A MIN[I;UM. dF ,2' HIGH, ;q5'J•; { ~1,.' HANDRAIL'S"SHALL. L'.E'PF:UVIDED ON ALL R~~ f?S,FND o.: , ' . ' , I y SIDEWALKS'. AS'RE~.J.UIREL' JY'THE FLORIDA l'.1IL~L'~G.CODE ' . G..A;.L:AMf. ,JMENTS. AND',-•REV :iU~.a. .2001 INCCUDIN 45ty0 ~ 22`:PVC'$TORM.PIPE 'If]:'BE :iCH,'.40 (WHITE) L.•.`'F1U~: (N-12)'SMOUiH ~1 ;hP a6DO { ; ;l ' :I WALL RING ;AND G ;SKET ? I PROPOSED KEYSTONE WALL; , ~ .46;50 46:3a ' . li' DESIGN AND PERMITTED BY OTHERS, ~ 46.00 46:3a I ~ I TOP Of 'WAIL. EL = 96,50;. La - 46:52 46:3a , 96,38 ~ 46,3a ' ..4./ i , ~ ' y PROPOSED :RETAINING I WALL W/42' FENCE,.. 'OSED CLC;IlOUT / DESIGN AND PERMITTED PROPOSED 39;LF x2' CONCI;,;TE PAD' I ; ~ 'TOP OF VALL BY OTHERS YTYP) 6' PVC (SCH SAO) 4230 ~ / ; EL. 45,36 'ABED RU. EL : OR-ADS (N=12> , .H PROPOSED 8 0.54% . EMENT _ • ' - i ' ~ r -v'OSEll ]SION hq ~ ~ fROL c h OF WALL ~ 4538: i l_ / ~ - , ,'t _ • FIGURE 16 .,wtt.w~,.:- ...rte::. ,w~...~._.._s.~_. ...a..e...::e+u~ ° . - ~r~.,yc.¢~' •.,.~suw .b ~jE.raamc "'O°`'i CLIE 15` 29S -:~`5E PROJ'ECT mz~ios b NT gi n.,. rr/ir r DESIG.'NED BY PVS SHEET . m2O03.by,l?rofessional PROJECT NAME. SEC. x TWP: RNG. NO. DATE BY REVISIONS ' E eeri: mjheerind Resources,'Inc ~RAW~NG:. TYPE DRAWN GMc . NUMBER ' - r„ - - UM ~ All Rights i/, i, All Rights. Reserved CHECKED f3Y PVS ; 4N COL i ~ TY , -03 The ar r ai The arran ements. de icted DATE L p/''% ? PRELIMINARY 1 .~....d. CLt ~S L.L.C.. , ~ • hei~cin'ar . f y hei yin are the . sole,: prope;ty of i,tofes SOON SCALE IIISSOURI. ~ ~1 ~ ,r. 1 r !,n_ - 7 a Rc::ourges - of Pr.ofessi'nal°Fngineering C AP PR OVED ' . Rc: ourges, hic. and in not PROF1;5: I~i;tLL' l;l~'G1 ;:;[?RING. RI?SOURCI; C01 sTRU 710N y S, INC p 9 ~i w r1 --w _ be repro ,~i ~ i.: i 1 ~e~/ -y".il 1 'Yr ~ c , be reproduced in any. form 646.9 Lh AVE. NUlMi 'PETERSBURG; -33702 ? RECORD CL RWAT V.., L. 337.~3 W.iti~~ut 1& 201. w without.ts.,riticn permission PAUL 'y :SFFERAfA,REC. NO 356 ORS (727) 576 007 PEUII I I i~~LRS , ;.x~lir CIVIL Ex ~ LL :.:.,y.-..: ..sa - -..,.wem.,~.wwiwwae -~,_,y6y.LJ.ii•'. °"'...triL,. ,::LYY. :7u'L':..,t 3~®~; ,~..~r. .w+u,. . ~ ~:EGEN~: ' ~ PROPOSI,I),'': '~X1S'['ING EDGE OF, NORTH . V=: ~WATEF -AlN ~ r I ~ F FIRE N - - RIVEUAY I puN " TER RAIN . . 1D ~ RCPE~ 0316% : r REDUC .k, WA -(`i , JI , CONTRACTOR TO TAPER - - - - - I - T AND. CURB .TO SIDEWALK AND - ~ TEMPI CRY HLDVUFF EWALK AT UR PAVEMENT CTYP) PnL'i'USEU TYPE 'U' `kIRE I r RANT °¢-'i . Gi,,TS L;L'ET F,D•O;L i ;GnTE 'r;,LVE (GV 6 BOX)s IIJDI=X NU.' 211, ~ _.q , ' SIAM[ ; CUNNCLIIUN • . . GhniE Cl.. = 40.27 DUUBbf CHECK ASSEMBLY i'„r _ MEET,;At`D CONTRACTOR TU' PROVIDE: 2%' S JNV, = 36,50' ' q'' WATEh hETER ~7~ G CURB F'~AXIHUM CROSS-SLOPE AT : P> BRIVEWAY "LOCATION, .--$5', ~r-+ ".SAN1T 2Y'SEWER LINE • - Y E R FURCEM.AIN $ VE SSFH-~ SA)J11 , - ' - - ' - - ` - • VER MANHOLE , (~i S,. ~ " • - - ' _ ANI1N Y' SE CLEA , OUT ' : • , . _ - F,~ n.~o.c:" ~ :$TURN: DRAIN: '~o - - yb r: ROOF 'M~11N cdcoo ' ` ' ~ • ryo. oy GRATE U:LET oy EXISTING b~' *0 + JUNCI ~,I'BOX ASPHALT , n o. v o a " bti' ~ ' EROSII V.CONTROI + . PROPOSED 27 CF 18' RCP .2 OJ6% ~ OUTF~,_L STRUCTURE i~ ~ o M1TEh, J END SECTION (M,E:SJ Y,/ TOP C. SANK. -=r~- 'osJ ~ "Tf-'PT-'i'f ,FENCE CR VALL x = x ' . - - E'ASEh !;T OR SETBACK - - - - *1 ~ ~ END RETAINING WALL: , - " ;.'TRAFI.~ FLOV ARROW ; CONTRACTOR'TO TRANSITION • EXIST]NG.~ RETAINING WALL TO EXISTING _ sus , ` SIDEWALK ELEVATION WITHIN ~ . ' (y +1nND1( PARKING: SPACE u / : f'~%C/`~V` N:P C "CHANGE IN SLOPE Nia • STOP ~ 'LAST.15':OF WALL:' , I o-=up UN Hia ` DEF aIN J , ~ • , E%ISTING 12:0 ELEVf 1N 14 ~ 75 ~POVER t _ I ~ I LIGHT PDLE CONTU , 90 t w ~e , ` i., ,..o., . ,,~rra~e...ro? .,..i.r,a ,~w..:nu.luerwr•....~ „ ~ _ : ry ' PROPD$ED JUNCTION BOX „ „ b,: -LI' F~.i`:-='-L 4t~ F:D:O:T. INDEX" NO, 200 201 ,.i ~QNli1lS~T~l1: TQ" ~7t~.L `'JU~011[Nli '.~T 1-UO~ iJ2-~1I~t . • 42.69 - - ~ I"', - - I RIM EL' - 42,32 i V". ; 44,24 Ia : N:INV;="36:70 48.~hIS,,PR[Q[Z'TO :+Il)."C[,EAR[NG OR COI~~[1ZUCT[ON:. 43:52 f • W. INV; = 36,70.• I' • ~ i FOR E~1ST11L:UTILl~1 LOCATIONS; M 44:26 .NJ " 44:26 r:. I' I ''~O ~"O; O ~0 ~0 43.76 N 43.76 44:14 ~ ~ i~ ~ t 44:14 ~ 44:14 ~ EL~ 0431 ~ ~ ~ "~f ~I~APHIC~~ SCALD, 45:62 •[562 bo ~ .TOW, bh 45,D0 ; , M1 b,. ~ NOTES + LP" f1 + I~>/i b ' 1,,SEE CONSTRUCTIO,J NOT:.3 FOR ADDITIOIJAL f';7~ S x:72 i ; ' , / , . 2r 1NSTAl.LATION:OF NDS'°115 INLETS .AND P~ '•'I !r'!NG - _ 1 , "`1 +:TU BE: `1NSTALLE'U AFTf i~: BUILDINGS ARE C. , j' ^'ItCTED ~•'.pND ,HEAV.Y EOUIF''dEIJT', I., NO LOrJGER NLEI<; I) I;N THE I I~ r.,.3a : - PROPD$En TYPE''u~ '.:::31TE,,~:.THE NDS. ir,l~.I~...LTS ARE: NOT;•D.ESILhLJ:FUR:;; ' .u~i {1 ' ',GRATE INLET F:DA:T• PMENI ;LOA A E ~h -IyDEx ND: 2u HE vY. EMENT',r•b~i~KIN~ 'E - , 3•ALl PAV XCEPT PARKING:~TALLS ° ~ GRATE.' EL . 45A0.. ~ I I W, INVr - 41:22' '.SHALL BE 'ALKYD: THL MGPLASTICS :90 MII . IN - L ARS,:PAVEMENT'P,dKiNGS, STOP T K ,SS A ,$:..ARE'TQ BE WH[l E, . ALL , ;.'ARROWS .',PARK[ G STAL ' ' - it EzISn:,~ I PROPOSED RETAINING . ' + HANDICAP• PARKII;G SPA`:ES::SHALC` BE MARI;ED. ass-r r 42' HANDRAIL , ~ ,WALL W/ - :~`A000RDING,TU Cf,l"Y~OF CCEARWATER REOUIkEF~FNTS, • 45.88 I rte- DESIGN AND PERMITTED 4: >ALL.:SIDEWALKS'.aIALL NAVE` A EDGE PRGif_CII[IN OF•, f~ ~BY OTHERS (TYP> • 45:88 ~ I WALK: ' V' x,12 FROM.:THE EI',.GE OF THE'SIDE ' Ir~ 5 ,CONTR;ACTOR TO 1;UTIF~ ,CITY .OF~ CLEARWA T•ER. • 45:ea IONS+I: ENC.:,dEERING F2ESOURCCS;: INC. ' " 46'.00 45:96 45:84 ~ AND PROFESS • 45:50 ~ ` 45,46 ' 48: HOURS: ItJ,;.ADV.ANCE ;;F,INSTALLATION,i;F:TRAFFIG' If , • q ? ~o `:CONT.RpL- DEVICES.' UN i:UID ROAD` AND Mr,RT1N LUTHER , r PROPOSED"DR"AINAGE a-:... , bH + ~ ; ' , ` KING JRi'AVE,'TRAEFCC :CpNTROL: DEVICES TO BI 1NS[ALLED ; ' ~ / i , I r : SWALE (TYP) . ' , , ' 45:9e / , ' -I ~ • ''s~ I: crD.BE SanoED) . ~ ;AND' INSPECTED BY PRL: ESSIONAL ENG1NEEn[l~u • ~i i bti' RESOURCES INC •f?RIOR T.0 COMMENCEMENT OF a6:D1 /7 d • CONSTRUCTION ' t I _ 6. 'ALL,NDS `INLETS r1RE 1,) BE NDS 1215. I/i>< TOPTJi"'TALL, '.Z;. ALL•'ISLANDS:ANll~.OpEI. AREA.AROUND BLDGS ARE TO;BE ' " 46:06 " ; , : ; , - I ~EL~ .,,,::18~ , FILLED, AND GRAI;E:D SC AS',TO BE POSITIVE: 45,56 ~ _~!LLL ' • DR F R SlJ'•' A E WAT R RUN AINAGE. O :,f- C , E OFF ~ ~ ~,3 r 8: `ALL M E S, 'TO HAVE TG,: WALL AS` PER . , . ' 45.38 ' ~ ~ R ' 45:9a : ' ~ ~ :F D O T IN1lEX NO..270: a5:94 T•G•w' I _ _ 4,~Al.L_-HANDICA'L_R,~~~S f .E_TO B~ .EMBOSSED PE _ _ ~ I ~ PRGPERTY UNE +A`'' A' F,D:O:T.: 'INDEX NU, 304, . °AGE 1, SAW CUTTING. _ • . .x604 ~ " t~ ~ QA'L7IIY LINE• '°;GROOVES'•,1S N~T:ALLO' c:D,_ ~ I. YO.;•.ALL DRAINAGE SIRUCTI j:S; Ie:,PIPES, INLETS, MANHOLES ETC.. : ' . ~ "MUST 'MEET F:DU:J; SPC •1F`1CATIUNS: ' . ~ f1, :'CONT~ACTAR TO r1AINTrlId DETENTION,POND, ~ 'I 3i ~ 'UNTIL ACCEPTED.'BY O!r:hER AND: .ENGINEER °I~ - I OF RECORD . ~ •r 12,`';CONTRACTOR'TO PROVIE MAINTENANCE.OF'::T,RP+FFLC ALQNG,LraIID . , ~ ; • . krv'~ b~, '.ROAD ".AND MLK`AVE, AS PER F,D:O:T:' INDEX ESEE DETAIL), + I , I,j + 13: ,ALL ISLANDS TO BE fII:LED TO EbGE • I , NTRACTOR TD TIE" gF'•PAV,EMENT..UNLESS ~:JiHERWISE.NOTED: . b' ~ ED uT 1;4:::CONTRACTOR ':TO • h'.LMQV;:".EROSION' CONTROL BUILDIN DOWN SPO S I~,,;, , . INTO P:ROPaSED cLEANOUT ' UPON COMPLETIU'i,OF 1.OJECT AS .DIRECTED' ~ l?Y• ENGINEER OF i'ECOF i): I" , ~ I . 15, `-".CONTRACTOR TO •I RUV11:E F,DA:T. TYPE„ ' , : y 'P' •OR•''J: rSTRUCTURE BpT.TOM FOR. ALL DRAII ,r,E 45:75 Vii;/ , , ~ . ; Ll , _ :.INLETS' T(] ACCO„hIu~ODA1= STORM DRAINAGE PIPc I~.9 L : ; ' RKlfl~ ANll `ACCESS ANGLES: SIJACL .IUT 46:21 I 16: '.HANDICAP` PA '46.33: ~ > EXCEED''L50 (2/J `;IN ALL DIRECTIONS - 45;63 46:21- + ~ ~ T:•:~ 17; THE' MAXIMUM,.LN:.IGITUD.IJAL'SIDEbIALK SLOr'E IS 4559 - ~h, .i., Exls : , ' 1; I ~S[DEW7LK'HAS A,LONGITUDUJAL SLOPE t" 46:62 r, I ~ ~ , GREgTER. THAN ,,li A R):~1P ,MUST BE' UTII.IlED ~ • 46:52 46:41 E~%/ ~ . ~ ~ 18',„THE MAXCMUM ALLOWABLE' RAMP SLOPE IS.'1~1~ (83/)'' ~ - ''THE' MAXIM M RISC FOR A, RAMP- IS 30', 'THE MAX CLEAR ' 46.52 4591 ~1.%. ~ ' x : ' 4 " ~ 'I. W WIDTH OF A RAI~~i IS AL.L LANDINGS',ON Rr;MPS' :SHALL `BE NOT LESS TF,,N~60' (SfT.) AND,`THE;BOTTOM OF '%/i`~ EAGH RAMP SHALL HAV:. NOT LESS THAN.6' OF STRAIGHT'r•`J~ ~ `I I C":':-': F'A RAMP CHANGES,DIRECT]ON AT A- _ . C ~ LEVEL.GLEARAN t I ,BO' : 'j ~ , ti t ,,o ~y `.LANDING; THE: MIIJIMAL LANDING SIZE IS,S'x5'• : • - ( 19' 'ALL,`'SIDEWALKAIJD RAFPS'SHALL-.COMPLY"41ITH THE FLORIT~, / ~ DE'. ?001: INCLUDING ALL AMEN) CNIS AND REV[ ' S / °BUIL'DING..CO ' CURDS, b O:.RAMPS'AND LANDD,GS WITH DROP-OFFS , y; y I P ~WALLS;.''RAILIN( SHr,LL II`AVE: ' ~ ;S OR f ,~OJECTING BOREAL[:S 1 IAT - 4664 ~J/•'. ~ • . : i. PREVENT, PE(]RLE:: FRDM. SLIPPING EFf THE ;RAh1P: CURBS ~,6.1a a5.74 1 `SHALL,':BE A M1N;I,h'UM 01 2' HIGH;:. . •21; •IANDRRILS SHALL. BE F='7VIDED ON ALL F'(,uPS AND,': D, SIDEWALKS AS'R[OUIREU:BY. THE F.LOR1Dn:.IIUILDING CODE r I ; R '2001 ;INCLUDING ~,LL AI :_:VDMENTS'AND .REVJS C S ~ ~ , • ` 45.90 ~ '~2.'`PVC:;STORM PIPE`TO Di. BCH 40,(WHITC•) Ei~ r u~ (N=12> SMi:dJTH HP 46:50 I 'WALL,.RING AND:.G.ASKEf. 4600 ~~ij / ~I , - PROPOSED'KEYSTONE WALL: / 46:50 " 46:38 DESIGN"AND"PERMITTED BY",UTHER$ • ~ 46:00 46:36. ~ • " / " • 70P OE :WALL EL: = "46:5D " / l 1 ' 1 ' ~ ~ e: " 46:52 46.38 46.38 " / ' ~~~~pp ~ 46:38 ~c/},r ,y. / ~ ti~ ~ y+ ~ / PROPOSED RETAINING " - bti ~ \ ,'WALL" W/42' FENCE: PROPOSED C(,-:1NOUT~ \ DESIGN AND' PERMITTED W/2'x2' COi',:'":ETE PAD PROPOSED 39 LF / / TOP'.UF WALL, BY OTHERS (TYP) • 6'-.PVC (SCH 40) ~ I EL. = 95:38" INV \ . . -42:30 OR:'ADS (N-12) , PROPOSED Rl EL, " @ 0 54'/.: ~ . MATCH PROMU~LD.:" PAVEMENT j . PLOPOSF.i) 'JSIOId ryyy. ti CIllJIRDL r) +b bti.. ~ bti' (SLL UCI ) ' TOP OF WALL ~ ' EL = 4538 ' _ _ , RS FIGURE 11 . ~ +4114.~.:::..Ali1Y~i+:.u::d4L,dWdYwiLJJa1~I+fl~mY'::14Ytit?® !R d.i :~til'aYi1,.~.Y: WI a1W1. ~:1/tai1~ IOI L~,Wy.~:• yW' ~:~>~~u~,: ~tl1 ~ •'~ri .r:.. W ..4., N.: rev,. 2002 m 15 29sRNCf: , : PROJECT NO DA TE BY REVIS . . IONS. m 2 003; by.Professional . D`RA W I N G TYPE` Gtc4c NUME~ER 'E Y Ei, ineerii~Q'.Resources; Inc. FDA o ED BY PVS CLIENT. PRQJECT NAME.. SEC, TW. -77 NUME?k,l~.*l All' Rights `Reserved j/~~,~ j `Al1 Ri -05 03 .,11D CO8 ~R~'YAR T},o ngements depictePRELIMINARh,:icim.are thesoe propertyVI. of Profc~ onul Enginecring ; „ 0 N5TRUCTION lt~nirca; Inc. aninay not I?RUIION LN(.;l !EERING I1 SOUR(,~, IC be re roduced.inany"form ST PETERSBURG, FL. 33702 RECORD d 0 U 4 of Pr L. C.: CL~ R L , . - - - - lt , SCALE soup,,i be re u 103, lr ~ ~ s o~ n~illIo -POST CONPITION BASI N ,y M... / t P 646 J illi AVE.. NOR1'li without :its written permission`511ERt:rA,REG.' N0. 35628 PERMIT EXPEDITORS (727) 576-2007 y 37~fi i -2u AI ~R FL. 3 CL~ .A RW - G ENGIN. I RS PLANNERS- CIVIL , . „ , r , I , SEC: 1,5:., TWP ~9,S`., RNG, '15 E TES INC:. , , . , . DEU..L AND ASSO~IA , l,. FRED . FCM -NORTII - • " RST AdENUE 1620 FI . . . i.D• h0 . c G FLORID: 33713 ' T. PET 1 _ _ , - - • 822. X41$1 _ LELEPH 7 l _ ONt. 727 , 17 , _ , N.L.B. # 0 ~ F AUTHORI~AT 0 _ . . " L®ND: . ' ER IFICATE 0 , C.T.. ' ~ A C NDRIONER ~pp • ; • LOW PREVENTER DEVICE A A7 o. , : ilf L ~ , . ~ IIU~dUhIENT , r. , : , . NC ~ E~NCE , , r b • , y : _ . , A_S ~ 0 ~ry 0' b 1 : , . : , ~ VISION . ~p IM~NT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ~ , : _ _ . , : 1 ~ ~ • 'h'^~ , 0 YMANHOL S h ' ANITAR ~0 0 ,F R r , M=46:03NAVD80: R _ ~ 0' 1 ^I ~ 'S ,:J~ i. p~. • ,r}- . ~ b r~nr tx T.B.M. N:RI ; X9.5„1G ' . 8 , 03-5~. C. . r 4. , , , . 40. ACRE L :oo , IN E 1 ER CORPORATION ~r ~ ~ 4r f1 - o• . , ' _ ' , ~4•.'.. F E140F5W1140FSECTION15-295•15E h0: 9~ ~ NORTy LINE 0 S ! • ' NW CORNER OF,SE, 1 _ '~i`': - ~ 114 OF : , , - .OF.SW _ : : , ANITARY MANHOLE'''..- . , _ t S ej : . , • 9S•1~E , . la=as.osNAVOns ' _ . 659 :A 0 I I ..SECTION 152. .B.M.N.RI . O.R. 3504 PG. RW: DEED 4 A „ y l.~^ , . - USINESS ~ : 4 A 2 Q. ,SIR M _ .y'-.r ^Xtr; 1•, : ~ ' . 2' CURB & GUTTER: J~I'r.. a,~;r : , . . .y t. LB 107 , ` 1~IITNESS : „ ' . Yy . ink } . !.`r r., ry 'I . W.L.:` A pIgWKATER LINE: GATE VALVE:. + q~ b ~ TRAF y,>*...... ~ w r a . GAS .:r POWERS uTH . , 0 52 E 765. 3 :SO . ' ' WATER METER i': J.89 J o PAINT • RCCLAIMED ~ LKiHTPOLE° . ~ P R8 e . +'v I ^ :r ••r • r. Y'. A .h.t w.r~r r ~t,• ~h r 'i ~ r '•aG.. 't•3N 'I K •h i r ~ r .~h . 7. Ss uric A,::'• • 1 DLE • 0 TP ' . . . tl'" h LI H rER ~ A L GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM ~ . g 1TPOLE B lo~~~~~ BOOK n, 't1. ll:w1 ih . ;4 . . '.1^'•e ' Y _ pp~~NNGG 0~. 20~. 40' I ' .6.T .r "0 ~ IGNAL 8 OAK 'h 16 .PALM 22"OAK. . . ~ S 1x 11".OAK.! ` POLE.., , > h . tk : k.. ~j t~ENCEMENT . p. , q, e • / v TRAFFIC . _ ; SIGNAL • 20 RNV EASEMENT, O:R. 3504 . PG. 660 _ TNESS_ F.~Af~GENCY M u - SCALE 1 20 GATE;V L ,M., - , , 4 ONLINE, IN .SOU . D " • IV o ND DISK - - - EI RCED CONCRETE PIPE. 3 , r; . s : t Mr45.87. T:B. SK'.:: r: n.4 . : , EAST SIDE NN OFWAY . a , - , ' : C POLE , WOOD.BRA E _ ; ~ _ , :p . NAVD:88 ,,N,. , . C ~iA Y DEPARTMENT, ~ ' : - , z t ; ' ~ SURVEYORAND:MAPP.ER'SREPORT , a „ . ~ F . S. p , I N 1. NO~UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS, OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS NOTE ; ~ : s. O - , , ~ r~ 2. NO.INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS RIGHT;OF WAY,,ANDIOR OWNERSHIP I ~F - ~ F RNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR AND,MAPPER,;EXC~PT AS, SHOWN WERE U . . ~ " _ ^r' r . ' : , - . s i` hD~riosecnoN ` 3. ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS. X 0:00, • g~CH: . ' W , K L - : , ~ _ .~`~k 4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED.WITHOUT,THE.BENEFIT OF~A'TITLE I B17 I~~"IRON PIPE 5. THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS WAS' NOT DETERMINED OR MEASURED QN THIS.SURVEY.: : - a ~ , ~ :a. . , . tx: h b. ~ b t •'u : , : e1' . . : O . . ' • ' 9 19 OAK.•,'. 1O. . : a. h : M Q, p K . . N~ . sr ' . . z. " , PA : ,a, : 0 , .t, c :It ' _ . . . ; , . , ~ r: _ , . _ , " , ; 15 PAL : ~ t , OAK ' ; m K , „ , 4 ii 11 , : r • 12 OAK ,.1 AK ~ " ' . _ 0 F " ti • ' .18:0 : , ' 4...W , - Wiwi ~ ~ • i . , 1 W.. 1 : ~ • ~ ..r. . TELEPI , ~ " ~ if, - . - C. r yo : LE ~ p0 , O~ S : ~ c_ . ' I 5`. ~ J ; . s . g . ~ , : : ~ „L.f. ~ r. ct . , . ~ b - 1. ar, 1ql p . ~ 18" OAK ~ ~i`" : .w • N - + , . , ' , „ ~ : , , r~. ; 0 , • . - b: (y b 'S , r' . , • . t. - .l , 5" OAK " . . ~ r: : , . t. : 3 P A C ¦ _ , , , : . 00 0' OAKS tlx.: : _ q, . . r , , . „ C~ LO • ' " , r„ ...r 'd' CJ ~ ` . , ; O i , , . o ; , r : : , : , AKS . , , , : , Q : _ , . . i. 4 , ~ j , K 0 : 5 A . ' r. , : :.z : . : GTE, , . ~ , _ : , , i~r.r MAR r' : , ; ~ . POST . a : I. s ; „ _ . I , ~ . , , _ .t tt w • .4~ , . : 0 w , r .n, " ~s ' : , is ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~pY~{ " ' , . . , .,~'1. I, O 6. y' . ~ ~ _ Y y, : •a.~, b• . ~ a ~ -:..,r , a ~ : . ;.r , ,rL a . .f ~ _ . . . ~ a J,,w , „ I'.. , 9j i r : : . h 6'. . A _ . i , t 6 _ . W r. 6. OA K' . ..x.. , , . ,1 w::. ~ ~ r t... : ~ , , , . _ S , ~ . t 01 ~ r:. . ; . A _ : ; 19 0 , e F _ , rh ~ ~ _ : O : - ~ r . ~ - N • , r., ~ i . . ~ o z -1 _ : i y. „_^1 _ 1 , ~ Z r :BAS~I N LINE . ' : _ _ a • ,ii`t r ; R ..3a • O d y ~ r,., , . , ;.,l, ~ : „ . : " . , OAK 20 : 3 , ~{va~ . r.. . . .r , ,r ~~~yrM N ti,':: ' , , ' . : . . . 0 ..M. S ` v, .dry ~ 1 . . " ~ . h , h. : , - _ . . _ . _ tx - . , :,w: ~ :r , , r 6 ' b w r~ , a ~ . . , - , .J u: r F ' ~ r . ~ _ ti 22"OAK-' : m s ! : 3', ' :<t. : . ' : V ~ , : . ' O , -F; . . .:.y.. t, ~ ' a . , ; is . . , - - . , • _ , : ~ , 4.y , , : , ~ 0 KS : 114 - - , , . 0 7"CAW •cL 1 F . . ~ . . , "OAF: - _ 11 , " 20"OAK , 48 EAR,- 'h ~ _ ~ , . A! is N.' . 1 . , h b ~ ' ~p ,1 ..y, f.. : O P . _ Uit : 8" LA . , _ ,r : 4 AK 0 " . , 5 L.1Ui2EL .1 y 7 LALaEL _ 7 _ LAUREL 0 7"OAK . ' T" LAUREL ' . . : t~ ry. `5" OAK 1: , . . y N ~ I7 URC . .~14"OnK h• : a , ~ _ . ' . - _ , y+A.. 1FCP4~ 3x3) 2 1z oAKS _ ~ 0 1 „ 1 FCM 3x3'. : GnrEVAL 0 - >k N,<s9 03 52 W4,:295.16. ~ • , . . _ ~ NO ..FIRER:~7 :INT. : - : " ti I• , , 1. . . ` ' r , - q,, ~ ;1ST. ~ , h . o , , ~ ~ ~ , y. ~ h • o~ ; , _ - ~ ' ` ' . - : : - ~ - °r - : ~ ~I V i : : . - ~ : : , r. - ' . i . ~I: . ' . ~ N, ~ q G 1AI R®~I~I PI ~~I _ FIrl1R~ 5 /1 • V/..1vII V 1 ri sm..11 C: FRED DEUEL WORK ORDER NO': 2')04 G2=2 f~OUN~~RY 1'OPOGR~4P DATE 20-005 DESIGN.,' DRAWN: O` ~S'URh~'Y FLORIDA ,SURVEY OR'S REGISTRATION NO 827 • ND~,SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSULTING r . , OF 1 FLORIDA • • NO; SHEET NO FLORIDA ENGINEERS REGISTRATION; CLEAl,',MATER PE ERSB CLEA'Ml T URG 'ZEPHYRH.ILLS ST.:. REVISION BY CHECKED. BY REV:# DATE itfy.# DATE` REyISION>.. r , i . • • ( c-RED DEU . h1JD ASSOGi: ,TES,,INC... ' >=G~,i ~ .:0 FIRST:A'::.;t1L"-"- NORTH _ x'10 I.D. PETERSEI: u,"FLORID~.::3713 _ - ~ - - SEC: 15 TUVP 29S:~,~ RNG. 1.5 E: 1 ;LEPHONE (;',7)022.4151 L~- _ . - - - - - - - - - - - :;tTiFICATE , ;tiUTHORI~..T10~:`L.B.# 10! LEGEND: . A C gNUITIOI;cR ' ~pD .tF~L04Y.PREVENTERDEVKE o' - a N~ U LIAT~ (ll (r ` r L , 81~ ~~;ll~r~,~;:uI,I~J~- hb Nc. ~ frL~-I I t. ~N I~ 7~,~(fF rF. ,~0" a0' • h ^ p~ • , b L- ViC~JN SANITARY1tiANHOLE. ~ 10 ~ ~ a' a~' - i T d.M, N.kii,;-4G.o3 NAVD88 b a aa' r•p ~ ~ nY, ~ ~•i ,a~• ~O, b1' r , P. ~ 1 t-NT Gr ENVIRUNh{GNTAI, F i,~)(fCTION ~ L.' V~lul~ I _ 3U.UU - - - - - - - - - - F~ ~11)~ 7A I~~R CORPORATIUN ' - . ~'p 1 A R L NE A 1 ~ ~o ' li Ill ~t ' + NW COi:IJLR OF SE 'I14, , _ . ,NOR'T'H LINE OF SE1l4 +.q' SW 114 OF SECTION 15.29S•15E . _ ' q Q b rye 9 2 0 ''OFS'.1.114C~F. s . SANITARY idAidHOLE Y x'~, : 9 a ICAT(1'~ ~.SECI,U1~! 15~295•15L 7.Ii.fA.N.(:...-~~,U3NAVD88 ,ry .p ~:1n1 pEE[7. ~o.~. 3~a~, p~. ' II ~2A~Lt5 _ ~ ' . SIF;(~l_) os SAS ~~so . 9s a o M :F, J o J ~ 6 - - ~ c ;~f~~7~liSL:CSS .1; l F~ 1.4]ir I i11 : 2 CURB$GUTTER '.fills ~r n , ~ _ r . • , y, O GrlE VALVE OP i OAS. - , p r a .TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX 'xU. • • ~ a • (y ~y~] j' • s~ r. J~.} I KECLAIh~cD WATER h1ETER - , S. ~ U ' UJ ~ L.. ~ ,1. ~I L, POWER $ * `..,,t;.~,,}., . ` } F' pp ~ , ~„TI PAINT I v.:" , >tx__ \ , t ~ n + u. , , t•~ ~•r ,.h .t .a> r ~ :.t 1 t . , ?~'1 .%Y`. .1 i r ti•;'" + i A~~ppiJ{bYDII~ ' r. WER :a.~L..la r, PO $ rv i fY'~ t fJ .,,r , b _ ' ; . . :.a~r• . .c,:•, . ~,i:. . r~ ~ 4,,= .x, tx' 4' 4 1 t • rid' 1 LIGHT POLE .:r 30.0 ~ c . t8 - ~0~lr~L Ge~JcTIC VERTICi,L DATL..~ .IIHFtAft I pole :.8. IAI R~rr ,u000K ~ ,i r _ ti r .}...r;.::. U A n,•, 3~ TRAFFIC .g,. FENCE -JE • & 4'CHAINLINK :cql"' •3~ .,ti SIuIIAL" 8°,OAK LM b - - . ..t, 'h' '16" PA t i OF C h4 ~ 0' 20' 40~ , . POLE a• 22" OAK . 9 '12".OAK 10" PALr;I. us~ CLEAR ~y h 5 11"OAK' ~ ~ `d 'n 4 I a~' • FChI 3x3 ) Ff1F('I INl' ~ Q. LfIC~t„ENT rt ' L,;IFFIC n a a ~ GATEV L': . ,ti ,NAL ~ .l N01. 1; ~~.~x !G'I ~ASE~.iENT J F': 3504; PG. 660 ~ rr ~ ; r, {1 lIS A14~L•NCY ~ . _Y, - ~A,f -f': lT -ONLINE _ u WIII,LSS • , SCALE' ' : 'i;ORD y+ D RIV~'T Ar;D DISK • - 1',B.M=45.87 au. - _ r AL $ DISK . ; - . = w . - RE i(CtD CONCRETE PIPE ' • (~Nl OF WAY , : • _ C a7Sl~c 101 a , 1 OOD EdACE POLE r(..n I ID I; TAY , V08~ U. } I t~~~P DEPARTh1ENT ' ~ S('~,'~'~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER'S REPORT: ^ v L'0 _ i. S:.. I ~,Fj~,,~~tn , v fi.0~} "N W ~ 1. N0. UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS ORIMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS NOTED. h ~ ~,r Fk~~I.E 2• NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS; RIGHT OF WAY, ANDIOR OWNERSHIP - V y, i. TE : TEI EPFI~~:c WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, EX~tPT AS SHOWN ..S I F D END SECTIOII 3. ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS X 0.00 ' : . RS ;~S 1 ti b) o; as aa' p,~ ~ a0 . 1;; ~{~p}'{'~~~I 4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH.• - DI ~ DUCT LE~IRON i~lr~e~ S. THE LOCATION,OF UNDERGROUND..FOUNDATIONS,WAS I IOT,DETERMINED OR MEASURED ON THIS SURVEY ' „ ~ ~ 19 UAK ; , .Y ~ . ` ~ b Q .'7~ ti b~. - . ~ , ,n P.;~trl ~ , ' ~ H ~ L P , T ~ ~ w s„ 0 ~ i..~ - _ , 1 PALtiK - , 1 'OAK m J J..J . - ~ , . ',I 7"UAK _ : , ` ' 12":OAK u , i o" OA , S m S ' • ~ TELEPH::ti . r.. ~J: S^ X3, POLE . ~ ~ ~ J ~ , l7~ i1~ ~ ~ bb b~, n,~ ~ 10 , ~ , a ~ is x b~. i- ~ . . ~ w: . . a W ` •s~ ~ (n ; .r •13" PAL.; ' W d i o'i 5" QAI(Q rry h_~ o ~ ~ _ - u + , (V o r; Q ~ .4;, 14"!i6"OAKS ~ ~.6:.OAK ~ Z G7E u. • y •lP POuI . ye ice. I' , ' ,t~,• 'i G" PALE ~ ~ ~ ~ p,I. it L~:r p ~ j ~ _ , 6 E;~.r b6 ~ 0 r I' 1 a~. ~ 1 - ~ . rn A S • . . , l.! J m j ^ i1 , ~ ~'„r ~ 16" PALM:. ~t:r z - 0 : i:, " ~.:a p t!z~ ~ Z . W y N ~'s 1~~; y ' • `t 0. :q' 1.3 ~ ; ~ - O 20" OAK ' . a ~ . x ~ , ~ _ ~ , ~ U J. t _ ~ _a LL • r V AAS ,.h ,O O ~ - 1 r 1 x.: w . ~ ~ , _a , : ' ;y9 u; P y ~ • ~ . 22" OAK . 3 m ~ ~ u + . ~ ' J i r ' ' ' ; W a: I: 1 , V~ ~i"LAL; : ~ : 1 , 0, i S~~j : ~ h ~1 48 IZ 20" OAK ~ h' "EA ~ 'h 0 k ih. aa' ~ a ;~i ~ ~l• •V~ 0 0; a~. J _ ' ' ~ ~ 8" • j AUItE A 1os: I I t~ 0 5'~ OAK t7" OiiiC ~ a s 6 ~cl.~;.r, „ 7 a L:;UfteL L.r 0"15" oAP: h 7" LAUf:.L U.3 6 C,r..,. l:.K FCN~.. M i } : ,~0,. C1. Q, 4124 C. _ l1 ~oh.1 b ~ 'T" ti' L 0'~ r i't+~ .:.i I 12"112" OAKS <0 ' i a n h . u ,r ~ .C: SEVALV 0 ~ - ~ ~ r,,.~H „11T ~ J.rJ. ~a i:.. V9. LJ:i:'IG 1~ ".a~,• FCM(3 ,3. ) a ti. NO I,U; r „ ~ , ,b : ` IsT. i o - ~ ~ ~ ' tl ~ ry' ~ I~ , . • . l ~ • _ • - • I - ro, ; , C ..FRED, DEUEC ` W0i h `ORDER N7MO7( •t62_ 2 ~ c ;ESICNr 8 UN DATE: 4-20 2~ ~~5 ~ CONSULTING EidGINEERS` • LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS Still -E1 SCALE: 1 20~ M FLORIDA.'SURVEYOR'S REGI51RI,1ON NO. 827 .;YRNILLS EARVAT;EI ST.. PETERSBURG CL CLEARI ATER FLORIDA FLORIDA ENCINEER`S'REGISI1RAIrIN N0. SHEET: NO, .1 OF j R,: DATE REVISION' 31' REV, .DA7r REVISION , E, Cflf CKED: r }"typ r w it ~ ail _ I , 'i . , . ~ i1'rv ~ ~ ~7 C,.P r ~ P Y- I I ~ , I,~w.J6.~.... ,v~..~~ . ~ ~~1~ ~ n~ lo.~~,,~..~ ~ ~ ~.r z-.., ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 { ,,.s. ~ _ ~ ~ ~ .'.w"W"ra. ,mod _ll ~ _ ~ -,~.amu~~~~ h'" I~ ~ r ~ 'r. r• ~ V. Yh. u_` A ~ ~}j~=."..'w...."'c"`.^~~ - ~5 ~;~.i ' i i . ! ~ . , ~ ~ ,1 I r_ _ . L... - l ~~a ~ _ _ _ ~ ,.....s,,.-,_- r • ~ r ~i. c-~.~~~mbi 'fir'' _ - ti 1' ~ ~4 ~ i,i u I L ~i 1 J ~ ~ ! I r' ! 7 I:~ d ~ ~ ~ n { d ~I > ` . r ~ ; M _ E~_. ~s ~,w_-. k°^""' p~,....~- ~ ~ 1 ~ _ ~ , ,.r,. 1 II : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ t 4 r~l ~ ~ ~ ,q - r ~ ! ~ 1 ~ ~ i ~ 1:~,I k: r'" 1, ~ 1, ~,w, ~ V ~ ~ ~ 'l n ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~1 ~ y ~ ~ . 11 z ~ a ~a ~ I, - i i ~ i I ~ .J ,r ~ ~ - T~ i Ali , - :;'ti{fr. mr 4 yE. j i' a iJ ~ i l ( ° a ip~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ! I J m~ c ~ , ;4 r ~ t F ~ " ;A ~ r ,i , ~ ~ i r ; Y, r_ . _ _ ~ ~ ~I q :.~::t~.a,~ ` ~ b _ f !f i t f ~ ~ i 1~1 ; i~ 3 ~ ~ Eli . z ~ i l.s 1. i' ~ ~ _ ® - ~ r t y ! 1 t I D!F ' I - 1 . _ °~h 1 i[...._ p t~ t~x/f~ k I D i ~k gt ~ I .I ` ;l::1~ I' r r ~ v _ ~ ~b ~Y' " + i .i,,.s ~ h - .N..,< urn y ....-i - ' i ~ k'~ r~ fi ~ ~ ' o ~ f ~ ~ (1' . d ~ u ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ v , ~ ' i. .u. _ e~ E' P ! 1 ~ i E ~ #i ~ r. r, ;x„ I ~ ~ x e r. . ORIGINAL . MAY 1 9 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEER i u f 4' ~~z th. ~ s ~ar' ~ f ~ ~r ~ x ~ ~ C~~~ ~ n r ~ r ~ r' ~ ~ ' - ~ pg ~S..~ qq [ L: w 7 A,~ ~ :kit - ~ ~ ~^i~''~' »~..:.~...~...~..~,~,,7 1 Y i ~ F ~ 1 ~a" ~ ~ ~b v k a ::.~..~..~.u,. - ~ .w.,~ o..~,..' v.. f ' d ~ .,.-,..w. 1n, i,,~,;~, h . _,.~u~ _ _ ~1 _ 1 - 1 i - - - - a~- t ~,~t l ~~l ~ _ _ ji ~,p dr° (j o ~ ~ ~ .o 3 o- 1 I~ t_ -"YV n i ~ ~ S v x ~ ~I " - ~ „~f 1 i q ~ s, ~ ~n ' . r ~ i ~ c; 1 6 1 ~~ti y ~ ~ ~ ~ s~~ ii ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ it ~ ;l ,n ~ - - ~ ~ ~~x~ wa.: m~: I , ~ i, ~ } 1 - - ~ ~ y - 1.. F y ~ ~ i Y , l 1 . t., f ~p J i ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ;;1 ~i'' ~ ~ I ~ 0. I ~ .,q r ~ I ~ d ~ .*ir y.. I,i ! 1 p i . ~ > M, 1 ' ~ 1 - 1~ N , r ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ; ~i _ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ _ } ~.i~ ° ~ - ~ ~ ,~r,.,, ~ ~ _ f~ .r ~I. "v ~ ~ ~ ~ .W.__.~- ~ 1.'. - ~3 Y_ i, j . m ti~ E I 4 ~ ~ ~ c u I - ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.e ~ k ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ _ ~ d ( i ~ i i~ t ~ r ~ . `l i! r,,~ I tl i ~i ~i ~ i X ~~i ~~~i. ~ 4 F . E,. '.r ~ ~ rev, ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 7i ~ + ' _ ` i p~ 0 1 i~ t~ i ~ d i 4;_ o^ ~ F ~1 i ~ I i ~ A, ~ ~ ~1 i ~i _ i j j ~ ; ~ ~ ~ I, j. sl ' ~ a . f y, ~d ~ ~1 I~ r f f~j " ~ ~ -,~~-._.-t.,, ' ~ ~ -...-.Wr i ~ ~ { - e,. ri ~ ii I . _ , ~ 1 ~ 1 ~k ~ ~ i ,x, k i ~ l . ~ (.,r ~ ~ 11~ It ~ ~ _ ~ iii ( t ~ ~ i ~ f" i i r ~ ~ ~ - j~ ® _ G ! ,.F ~ ~.`y A. ~ 1 . v ~ r~ P ~ a 0~ ~ ~ ~ e ~y; r ~ ~ 1. > ,i31! ~ 4 I~ ~iY ,y v i, 1~ t F.x , ~ ~ ~ _ , _z: .~.i.~ ~ ~ ~ .ra... .:RT~~... roe-'~+-.-r~....,t _ _ ~ _ _ ..::wu ,YA~_..._ _ ~ .,.::~-._.b o I~ ` 'I-mil +uu..~I~..1'r~uv.t-+-y-~~"~.+.+~+r~~`~vF•eul.+JL+a`i+~4~~~w..u.rwiYMYiw~- ORIGINAL t T/ LTm- ~1A r-m %9u MAY 19 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r yi ~ - . rp ~r E k~l~ ~~r . ~ ~r ~ ~ ~x . ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ff. . ~ ~ , r ~ r Y,ti ~ d. r x ~7 ~ ' ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ ~ 1 a , i ~ f~ ~ a ~ a ~ .F.~ ~ r r~"' a 'h.~ i o 'a' r" t s o fQ i, 3E o y v, i r ~ ~ h+ G 1~~,~ ~4~ i 5"U'& f `m 3'3St~?, ? ~ , ` i L`_;, t _ t-~.- I :'i: r u_, A ~ 6.r 1 i~.='.~ c ~ s~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ IA' ~r~J hi~i S , ~ ~.;..t ~ ~ ti . , r M i ~ _ r° i F~ a $ ~ ~ v; ~ { v~ , r i~ ~ r ~ l 1i~ r~ Q ~:4k . E (I I ^k.~ ~:y, {If 4 ~r, ~ _ a ~ u s ~ ~ \ i, V I ~7 y;'. ~ ~c,~, 4 ~i r u 7 f u__., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n n~ ~ w - r r w b,... M_ v.~...~ ~ .A~ g- "y ~ q ! ti ~ ~ t,,~:(( ~~c~~ f C° ~i y akk-. a t v i ~ ~ ~ i4d' „ A_~ ~~.r y;, :a : R z, _ a ~ i a~.. . i:, ? ,Q ~ ~ 4 y~ r~ w I ~::..d F~,+ a e 'I _ ~ - - y ~.,t+:r~e3r~~S1~s5x!r~. •md^ t y~" "`T'om` '+r :.,;,a _ w, _ r+~,w~w~.4+wr..rrLv~n..w`:w.u,~~:wuu«uu~+w~:rcu.wwi...aWU4.w~'c4rLw.a+'J'm' ~ T ~ ~ s - MAY 19 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Y` i S~. V , d ' _ _ ~Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I r r r r r i.. 4, ~ r. Y ~ a ~ ti i ~ ~ ~ r y}.. ~n., M' n ~ j n _.xf °w-~+. yY ~».~'+va: r.w..i! ~ ~ '^'~w~.+wW """"~%+.^~+w~...+....: - .i..~..Yr ...~...~...n...~n~.::,~ w. ~ ~ y.i e,.,.W..--~~..iw.yw. . fy ~p-= yau y~ F ~ ,;3i' CC~ a ~t, o ~ ~ a;. 1~+y, ~~Ef; + dL V _ u r 9'}_.. d^ 3 r d 1 A~ c ~ We v;~ 1 a ai _ , p~ f ~x. ti $r ~ p ter,,,... , - I~ ~ C~, ~r; _ 4 ~ , } i ~ ~ e ~s r j I I , o ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ it-- i i i r y ~ ~ be is r 1: ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ti _ ~ M ~ r.. " n n 'r C L y y ~A,. .R„ 7?fd`3 I~ t ' 1 r~y'"~.w 1. y y NY' ~~JJ" w r r+ f ! ~ ~ Es ~ a ~ , wi :"1~ qt ~ a N IM f ~ _ t ~ I :U l ~~_.r._ w v..~..,.w ~ x ~ ~ ~ , a, . „ ~ .r .S~ Y~ ° rb 1 ~„°~rww~,r-~,~ . _ a 7 ate' _ _ _ _ . Y }h'1 MAY 1 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE