Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-07077
12/19/2005 16:25 o r u 7277239277 t06 >r4?llrsnse C S S3TE?B Fsac 727.90 a S owc? APPLICATION O SUET 14 COPE8 OF THE ORUMNALAPPUCATMN Iew WIS 1> s 2) slspW OW 3) f ldW sob of sibs Owo 0 SUBW APPt.IGATION FEE A CARE B: GATE RECEIf1fED: RECE11M BY (sn WgWs): ATLAS PAGE it Zt NNQ DISTRICT: lI.IV+ID USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACEINt PROPERTIF& NORTH: SOUTH: E. * NOTE is TOTAL SETS OF vw<)RMATION REQUWWD (APPL"TTONS Pus SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ORIGINAL CQ=F%lae dVwla=Prsjed (P"ind04-03.05) RECEIVED -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- MAR 13 2006 A. APPUC,ANT, PROPERTY QTR AND AGUff WO MAnON: (colt Sscftn 4202.A)PLANNING D€PARTMtN CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLXAM T NAME. P bkk L and Tart/ V. }WM MOM &DOWNUM PHOW MI mwt a ll!- ? ZZ - FAX KANS : PROPERW $Y pahl& E. and *vm V. HUW. Aaftm R. OwnbmkJp Qirtkwkd. Ml. =mwn as wa? an tm dnd - pwarids c 1lo W Wpw&wW an paps % B. PROPOUD 01IS OP T tlW*WAATM: (Cods Ssctlon 4-2" ST F*-V AODRES8 Cf s d0d sft: !Q7 8111 aftft pg* Rd, LEGAL DESORIP ON: See itadted *AM Qf uM ?11U01M.M. ids edM sat tDOrpn of frs *wwlMlt into mb d" PAW,E,LNUA 1fN261lBf00Q0012!(ldOfiCO& l8/291161n000?l2IWd?100 m sf.] PAMU S M Q_ 4 ?i'rwrFll, 1, f XQ3O am !1- twass, s?+r? trs4 PROPOSED USE(S). MUS) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: ISM s.f. medlcsl g ft (ew nb@r d dwxft* unit. NoW wwv ar squsao a o(no?aaaidentl l' um) I OF BSI: SM Ex? A Atmd, Nhggb and a sp.cvsfo MIME k so ni t ?dp A nup aatad mds eovimba &g. radlR.om in aKp*vd num w of pw" spar.., Lma, ems) DEC-19-2005 05:25PM TEL)7277239277 ID) ZAYAC '; PAGE 02 PAGE:002 P,=99% ?---r V 0 0 O d V 12/19/2005 16:25 7277239277 0 ZAYAC r PAGE 03 WE$ Tt-ii5 APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TN11NIUM OF DEVgAPlAENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVEUWUENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPIl17 W (CERTIFIED) WM PLAN? YES ? NO .. x. , (E yda, aftkh a copy of the app6dbb dootlrltsr,IS) C. PROOF OF OWNERWilift (CO& A-ZUAAR Cl MO NT A COPY OF TW URE 6$0WAM POIJCY, OECD TO THE PROM M OR SM AFFIDAVIT ATTESTM OVANERSW {ass Pw o) Dc WRFnMN SUB49 { T AL i (Code Soc*m 3-"3+A) © prow de umviete respme as soft sm (a) GENERAL APPLICABILMY CIrt MRIA - LvisIf1 Its each orlWm is ed,ieved, In deftH: The proposed &NNOprM1 of the Iona wN be is Itortrlony wMh the saolr, bust. carVeralpe, O M84 avid dtiarVCW of sdjsc+W prWWOM In v"ch 4 Is loaded. 2. The proposed developmud w1l not hkm* or dWacu rwpe the scl 4 1 ii bso4nmo and rrsr of adj mwO Nand and WkfwW or sib :lpai the vow 3_ Mat mg 1, dwAftpnmt vN not adwwmly sBbd the heath or sabty or perwns msbft or worflgtp in fie neipfiborhood of the D use. 4_ Tlae prgpoMd d?eblopnre? r* dea?fbtd b fl9ipilMia7e Ilatf6C ooaoletlton 5. Ttm proposed davabprmrlt is o niieW t wfh ft cwww ity dW*CW of the knMo ate vWoft of the pared pr mpg ad for dereloprrrsnt. Q_ The *$" of the propoawd develOprYlent rr Wmt cn adverse effects. inalu *V w16 W, omm fa #ed oftctory and holm of opera t" impawba, GAR as 0mm p1 w Q Pry tw4de a nplbta romponmo to the ten (10) CO HENSIVE WLL RI OeVF-LOPWNT PROJECT CRITERIA (m appkable) -- E4*Jn hmeach alm Is-11 swd In dstslt 1. The development or oxbrmio{amsnt or dw pooM proposed for dawNaprrisnt b olNsrwiae ?rlpra ,N r v#Jvx t devh th" from the uee, WAnskr Wv dowaloon"" I- Indeprig RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEC-19-2005 05:26PM TEL)7277239277 ID) CITY OF CLEAR'MJE?003 R=99% i 12/19/2005 16:25 7277239277 0 ZAYAC 11 PAGE 04 2. The daretq XTWA of des vm* p mp m d for devajopFrwd as a =nprghMrMhM NO MdWA**rre n pmoo or ma denttat ire pro(ta wa Rd mduoe the Fair nearkMt VAW of atefto FMM • (include tha eleire voko of the Sft and We prgioeeci value of the of we the knpmv mark.) 3. the etei vAM MO varreprahaWim iiM Idevelm miM oaeMot ere odeerwt o p.rrr---' in #* ah d C1s# wMw. .. The ales or mac of uee wtthtrt the eompnhsneMe irNNl redtewbpnrent pr?ect are eorr?rrtbb wQh adjacent lard um. b. Sv RaW f0m fur Owm*prow t or mdmmbpneeret of Vw um or mbe of ow wittria to mnpmhomm inN fodwv@Wpmerd promo are no MONO larr.?r+iselt ire tletr e# CiltaNrwr- S. The d&v*W tetrtl of Mle peFoat pn*oted for dtrelopnrnt as a cwnpm*wvsom k M n dmglop nw4 pr*d wMt upgrade the immediaM VWA* of the pwVd pe Rpm li tar d"slopee- a 7- Tha d.aO of the prtpeaad oarIP wtewr d iM fadw*vk*mwt p ooo crsabe a form end AxKft that sedeanaes the a wnmurAy com acto of ft NMINdMMe vk*Oty oftda pwvel popoaad for-devokpmmt and the CNy of C *wvA*w as a wh*, 8- F%WbAY tl ""b lot wife, nod OMiadrs, "M 00 Q abset pa" m PNU%d by the benellts tD corrwnu * dearaater and pee slog vkb tY ofthe O w W g m o o led !or di alopment and twt CRf pf CwwwpW as a wAa4- >?-AdWqLm* m pginiae to t ?? temtuia in t7itaiebn 14 of Mlcb 3 wiM be tvalfmle to com 1Q- Ytee d.egn d M huMCWepr aompfias wM6 the Tourist grid or n4 1' wn UAW 0000n 9usd4Ynes in t7l dOOn 5 of ArOds 3 (aa m0lmb%s - L M amps ref frheeO as aaoaaeary. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13-2006 NG DFPARTMFNT CITY OF CLEARWATER DEC-19-2005 05:26PM TEL)7277239277 ID) PAGE:004 R=99% 12/19/2005 16:25 7277239277 0 ZAYAC 0 PAGE 05 E. STORMWATER PLAN litilll AMAL RRIQUREIMENTS: (City of Clorwsty Storms DraUage Design IAo wag and 4-202.A.211 A STOWWAYWHARRATM # AM BE SUB101IEtTED WITH ALL APPL.ICATKM. AM alpplfG moons rw irh aMdti W or modroaWn of funpervious surface, wxkm inq bugdlnas, must fr"mft a eWr(t1**w pion (hid demonstrates comptlance Ute City of Clawwalar OWn Orahwee Destpn Crillm is mammoL A reduralon in MVervbA suftaae arcs does not quafdy a= an aasM N a plan Is not axpirwk to nerrafir* 00 provrtb an opkwwfion at to *by the of is aanrrupt Q At s iMAmsrt? er SiOgbRVATIERPLAN oW htclnda iM b---- i _...._ Etdallut? topa?pnpNy ssasrndlrtp 5t! 1>rist Atiornd ar PmPa+tY grree; irnaKwssd of-Al inrJUdirt0 latieltsd floor ilrr liarw of alt sbuctunes: AM agaatM all ab aM aautirfpat torew ayatares; frrOpoaatl ohwn walar tree i ndudlnp top of bards, toe of slope and outlet cw0ral ire; _ A naRa?wp deacrtbhp the p+apoasd sbrmwaier control plan irtdt I al cmbAM ors and dam necessary to ekmorw haia corr4*w oe vdh manual. G%Po um sad sed of Flaftda Rsphlt ad Paohsaiond tcitp 1 01 an bit piss and uMcWtim. a COPY OF PERWT NQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLOROA WATER MANAGE144ENT DISTRICT (SWFbVMO) PERMIT SLOW TAL (SWFWMDrppraad is mquirad prbr io iae www of C y Bul ft PWr*. If opp" k" Q AoknorAe 401 v0nt at okwa wow p" roquiteenenbs (Appiir:arrt moat how am of the 4oftaairp)_ x storrtWAdW pten sa rupee( aaor. l6 kR*l W 3tonttwdbf plan Is net tegctirlld and 0016naf;or narrOve Is eftctched. At a MM Mwn, a gradate plan and *wwd floor elevatlors shag be provided. CAUTION - W APPLICAMN REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQU tT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND MOIL HAS 1 StII - ffELIN APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AMp SIL# WICJ1W DELAY MAY oclaxt. if you have weetbes mgandhtg two rs*ftemenb. corded the City Ptftc works Admin*nw* n EN*W s t Depertft*M at (727) 582-x4750. F. SUPPLE ANWAL. SUBMITTAL • (Code Seetbd "02A Cl SKMED AND SEALED SURVEY (xrdudkg Neat deeoip I A of poperty) - One oriaYtai end 14 copin. O TREE SURVEY (1ndUdhtg aedstinp (rasa an sip! rwo wtthln 25r ofthe "sioem site. by speo". stun (DWI C or pinata j, and location, Indtxfhtp drip grrs aid I " 1 -tiny treat b to mnpwaM -pbaea esaigr Around bta p3daft flees; Q LOCATION MAP OF TM PROPEM. O PARKM DEMAW STWY In cw#x% m vM a requea to rrrakri deviations to the pauddrtp abmdwft (s. Reduce number of spaaee). Prior to the aubregtW of this eppfoalfort, to nwftdokW of such study eM?11 be approved by to Community Drookprrm t Coun*u ur and shag be in scew0ence wM oooepmed Baltic wokwertnp prlnGitrse, The tblWnW of the study ml be used in determining whadw or not deviations to tho pew atstdar I am appmod: D GRADWO PLAN. as appbo ble; Q PREUMINARY PLAT. as required (Nola: BWM tp pnmib will not be issued unO evidem m of recordhtp a final pet a provided}; U COPY (W RECORDED PLA'T', as 494C OA; fs. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL : (8606M 44M A) 0 SrfE PLAN vrMt the blloMUire Mtfantrtkwn (motto enOW 2rr'x 3tt'j: ORIGINAL RECEIVED Enpbtterlap bar scot #r** n m seals one inch squab 50 into aad chic VnVwed- M6eoc rust iM?aatdtq rtdMldnat aitseb irtatrd.din package; - MAR 13 200 Foalltrtnf end ass of no "XTING bugdaips end shucaree; 6 Foomrint and visas a( ag PROMMM besdirgs auto rirusWmK AN+oq: PLANNING DEPARTMENT --- ?? °W proposed pobft of a°°°at' &L4* Imlailedm, CITY OF CLEARWATER (deaf Oq or dovko""wtpll unipue am", Ours( as wahocouraea, wetlands, brae masses, and specimen (eras, Rtdadirtp drlaafpliom and tocahloet of sawarsmxy, prarrrd cover vgelafbrt std wMtlNfe tt?4be, sec; Lcotliop Of aN pubbc sad poil nraarrteals; Lotslion of all stow( riwft-of-w wMtYt MW as 0mv to ute aibr DEC-19-2005 05:27PM TEL)7277239277 ID) PAGE:005 R=99% 12/19/2005 16:25 7277239277 ZAYAC PAGE 06 t oftn of axirtirtq pttbtte and pVkVfie uWsa. Ntdudsg the hydrants, sh mt and sanitary sewor Insa, marthtofss and Nit dines, !ham and voter Ines: AN psddttp spsass, drkvmr ^losdblp a eso and vehiontar use areas; DsplcOon by shadhtp or aostd, Wft of al a**" psi kwV lot inlwW Wmbcsped avow. lecallon d aN sold wash tyontsM?see, esgreNetp or trash hsrrelnq antes and outsids nrtsdtiastid.qulprresrrtand aI rorpnie.d saa.nittg 1per strefton 3.2tlt(D)(q and fndetr sro+x _ Locatlore of aN atsirfr and aide MarnFwabr ntpeapalttsrtl M?Ms: Lgo*m of aN duWw Ng O on 060w. and of all swat and pwpowd eklowmas. 0 WM DATA TABLE *w -1-1 p. mplied. and proposed devok ttbtw in wtfwerNbbuFar tam: land a rso in soptate last and aces; plop" OF EwNrtM ltAm&* iarlwtt, Nil e*w d PRQPC6p dwsl k w ft; Grow floor ano daaobd a each use; Pwkirq oa*w 6 M m nvdW yW1*0 bt trbWw tuft with Ow munbsr of raei wod ospos; Total paMd area. kckd g aN pwied p O tp spapss and & wreys, eVressed In square feet and peroer*W of the paMd vehicular arse; SaM s steaaw d es tlatrlror?ps mttlsrlsf; r Olscdsd reopeds book and pstps nurhbsrs ofN a tfnp oO ft MserttertK BUMV and stntatuV hstghb; knosma** surtaaa r+Mb (LS.R.); end f=loor am ratio (FAR) for al noereeWeri i case v POXZED &M PLAN aunts (8%X ii) end color rw 4v% p r posatole; a t:OR VENMUP?it NM OVER Old AC$tE, pevridr tits foNgreirtp addNionw ooDmlatiat on aNr plan: One-Ooot oonbw ro or spot dw mkw4 eat 6NS; offow alsrsl ons Y rraC11 2 b ovabodo thta pnegossd sbatttlabr rpwlaSa ""It for #0 paroot; At open space atsas; LacWan at AN so* at w*w 111 f irWp waft and amth wools; Let Nnas and buMdinp Nrgs (dknanabnsdk SO"* sad *WW may, 9wkw4 and frucma voloo i (eNmentlenso.. ?_,._ l?re?itaal araeMartps; _ Tess llwen*Dry; prepared by a "cerNNed wboW. of aN (rose 8' DM or fhrooW roASdiep sits. csreppy (drip Mori) and eondiboe of such tress. H. LA1409CAPOO PLAN St TAB : (Secdoo 411" a L4XD6CAPE PLAM AN o- 9 and p mpoaod sbuch,, Naretas of abed ft sweets; OMkwpa and na1101W 1 anraa iK hAV awalse, side "*ft and boMM elav06ola. Delrtsstioa and direwnMons Of aN atquied psroelMtbr IMndsta>ps tturlrera; Styht obilb" leWpMa: DolrMklon and dins mft of AN pMft arose bm*,W tp WWAk cop ft isiarda and curbing; Prvpnssd and mgeWed parkkV %Mco ; E>ditlrtg Was O" to and ittnndlattlty adja WO tD 9W silo, by spsdss. site and bcaifons, treaiel driptlnss (as b*;I 9d on rwquirwd tree sumep; _ Pbo sdodub vft a key (symbol or" letdlcabnp the t+im d i i ctlptlcxe, spacNlr?llens aed quardli w of aN and proposed teradsco; nuebsrials. iwitrd4tp bOt1M1iCa1 end oww on now ; I =W* m size, and ""as of aN so #kV 04 propasad landscape motorists. k dicood by a key rshathtg to the plant sclte"; T'ypW pWOV dstals for bass, pim shrubs and wound ower pietas itdudirp kobudbrts, soil mboes, bsckt* q, muichM and probalw meco es; ittte ew hodscoo np soves hatdtsd and/or shaded and labeled and ko for h n 1- bps cowers", up -zing in both squsrtr feed and par"nhwa corsnck cAftmens or s prowkn o cfsvabpmartt approval *z corwftns Avowd by the Canty w* DeMeWpoient Qoem); ..0aNon nobs. a IU!DtXXD LANDSCAPE PLAN b ow& ($ Y #X 11) (color Aw darNtg It p 1 4,1sr O IPftf ATMON PLAN (tequirsd for Woof two and Vws gNWPA , Q COLUMEWENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROORAM oppk;*bW, as sppk", Landacapo ossoolsW with the Comprehensive Landscape Proprsnt OW aapoW ratniawm Cody mrAdoorno t to oftot thtr wow whero p*wnum Code wW not be met ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DEC-19-2005 05:27PM TEL)7277239277 ID) PAGE:006 P=99% 12/19/2005 16:25 7277239277 9 ZAYAC • PAGE 07 I. SUNMIW ELEVATION PLAN TTAL REMARMWEM., (Secdon 440 JL23) RaquNt+d in qte event #a applieagon htdmOn a devel pmer t vrktere 41660 lrtardsrds ars In Issas Wil. TOUnd and Dpwntpwn 0W*j at) Or as P4 of a Camp e1mullMe tuts R dwelo'WAO PmjeO of a Residsnfid kM Project. 13 at"00 REVATION DRAWM -all *Mn of aM Eerbg%s molludinp 1>eipht Ononamia, coign and mwalda; O REDUCED BUR DM 6NATU MS - bur dies of 61110 ig w0 colas and melarieir to scab (316 X 11) (btaclr and utWo and odor ronderft I po.aibie) ay r WAred- J. SIGNAGF: (Dhrj*ion IL SIGNS I SaWas 3-Inq O A MUMMtreed and atla0h.d sO+s; P"? t phdWapbs and Ononaione (ame, hftK etrl), i WIC00 rAkefher they veil! ba temovad w remain. Q MPROROSM , slum Provide det?wit i??p tocokm sta, hsiptd, coiom, matmuft wed inning; ? son ilinckwe do 0, 40600 (nwnma Q compr0 anehre ei r> Program appkrrliM as eip I!rabb ( + "W %a ra4tvAf)' ORIGINAL O Rbdroat attptage 9Mposst (8 %X 11) (0010), If uta t ne C.anprehattal a Sign Prormn ap$1- jinr?- RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC FACT STUDY: (8*0*m 4-202A13 and 4-Q1 Cj a Include It reQulierd tY fe Trd?c p?ygti iirrtagar or hfsiha? g? or 1'tha pMp?i rlersbpnbnt PANNING DEPARTMENT • WM 41 al J 1116 1005001140 10 bVW of ssrrrtoa 1qr anti rnadA*y 0rc adapted :r the ti rriprehWWO Phm. CITY OF C LEARWATER • WE genwirle 100 or more now vehicle diraationo hips per hour andkv 1000 or more new, vowle hips per day. • I1MS aftra a a nearby rotidrer9 + 4fot ir>Is mctfon w111Ne (5j reportabia accddarrbr vOwin the prior twelve (12) r>tor u period or that is on the CW/* annum Ifet of 14W rtardprra irtaraacdorrs. Trip generation ahd be boW at the most rboerR almod of fie h+OHhrte of Tra sporudon EA~S (1m Trip Goneral Nutual- The Tralc l * 'Study meat be prepared in accordance wM a '8cop kV Meslhr>Y' held vAh do TMIft Opwatlore Limm ar and the Planning Depeolmerift Elurs+eprna t ftoiaw I i - i +o & Orth* Cl0a+pnee (727750) Rarer 10 B@dbn 4301 C Of f!t• CgnrOU*y Darral0 MW* Code for etacapdom b iris n quiwnerd ti Aduiaistedpa-are of tra0c t+nped study M**S daub 0V0k nt anal htifiad one of the toMOSalk Tmft irnp.ce Mudy In inckKi d. The at * must 6rohrds a atm wy W* of pro- and P?? ? of service for a Medway taps and each turning moverr>sr>t at aN inlsnediono tdeni ied in the Scog ft IAsetitig x Tram lnrpacl a" is no (00 VIA CAUTION - IF APPUCATOM REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUI WWJ4T FOR A TRAFFIC WPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIMANT DELAY MAY OCCUR, If You hew questions mearding throe recimar twar aorrt a the city Pubiie Works Adr>tkWtrW= Enip oearirrp Dmllw n0rtt at (727) 582-4760. L. SXMTURE: i, ttM . aokrtoteAedpe tl>st sN roprasav>i?or>r nwdv in this Wpk aAe and 110arala lov e h" of my irrrQwbdpe end i 411 vieR and pholorso the ProPwb or STATE OF FIAt0111A, COW" OF PU*UAS Sworn to and s>tbeatbed before,•5r>te #a day of A to me v4W by brown has 2Z4t4jj-)A6'q(z.1919r,'^' 14010,0757 mom p ?1? pubic, My am vreftsimr asPirN ,,G ROBERT PAUL HAZEL Notary Public. Stale of Florida W My comm. expires June 09, 2009 No. DD 439395 DEC-19-2005 05:28PM TEL)7277239277 ID) PAGE: 007 R=99" 12/19/2005 16:25 7277239277 0 A WIT TO AUTMOF=14 11 MT.- ownm an dW ZAYAC • PAGE 08 1. That (II or wrsawo) the owrA K(a) and road tw hoidNro) of" fain" Owwribed Ply (address or panwW boadwy 107 & t 1 t MaNk a 1111 4eIf Rd. 2 Th* d* paraperty aonstiW" top 191-flibt *tith • nequeat fora: (dmafiys rwqumQ taw fldf? O ivr requaed RECEIVED MAR 13 2006, ENT CITY OF CLE"WAI CK .?. That the undaniPitad (1?a1llfavr•} appgitlled and (daarldo) sppofnY - _ . KMO F Z0l0 ,R.(E , 10_4 111111111(tfbm" apsnt(a)1R letmall twWr after d0or?rrerrta neylmmy ilo ¦ id such pat>fi 31 4. That Brie a Mdwtt ho booth e1 n r min lob 11 1 - to Cryr of Cberwder, F b to tuurebm and ad on the ehvMe daaaitfad wuprrty; b. Tint of vbft b Ow try an neaseaary by Cay fopes"mogwn in orffet to proaeesoft appNCISM and thr graver i*udWjzas city IbprasentWv4a b visit end pholopraph to pMpft dse , t F cl in this appiliCo , 6- Th« W"). the Wrdsrr 4POd wtwrtry, hereby offift thaw Ow tmW*V Correa Prt>periy owner rty Qwo.r ciotprnrop STATE OF FLORIDA, ftwi a fns Nrs irrAlf-IN nsd, ars afoot d> * oxmiriiesloned by the t«a d, a$'O1ee of tats Le C , 2?5 pare rWy wpnved -7512 i +? 1,,V / & / r 7 mho n b , rst DtApoaes and says ttit hshhe tr>?r rarderadnds ttr cordeaes? ew wam done& / F ;' ?1 r 1 Oily at ROBERT PAUL HAZEL MY C w rripion E011NO_ ; Notary Public, State of Florida My comm. expires June 09, 2009 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The fore wing instrument was ack-no?wle?dged, before _rTW srwinvwrpaa ??bdl[+on odoc20_ Eby- -i (name of person acknowledging), who is p rsonally known to me or who has produced f?)c qyp (type of identification) as identification and who 0 1?6166$S did 1201t) take an oath. DEC-19-2005 05:29PM TEL)7277239277 ID) PAGE:009 R=99% 0 9 ATTACHMENT A HICKEY OFFICE BUILDING SUMMARY OF FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUESTS The proposed project consists of the renovation of an existing single story house into a single story office building located at 107 McMullen Booth Road. The project also includes five parking spaces and one stormwater retention area. This project is being resubmitted in order to retain the entire existing building and move the parking to the front of the building. The requested code deviations include the following: • Reduction in the south side setback from 20 feet to 7.10 feet (existing building) and 7.32 feet (proposed sidewalk). • Minimum lot width from 100 feet to 63.75 feet (existing lot width). • Reduction in the north side setback from 20 feet to 6.00 feet (pavement) and 10.82 feet (building). • Reduction to landscape buffer along north property line from 12 feet to 10.82 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to and 6.00 feet (to sidewalk). • Reduction to landscape buffer along south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), 9.73 ft (to back of curb/parking), and 7.32 feet (to sidewalk). • Reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet in front. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNINro DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 ATTACHMENT B HICKEY OFFICE BUILDING GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed office building will remain one story with the proposed development, which is lower than the allowable three story height in the office zoning and adjacent two-story building. The character of the existing building will be enhanced with architectural upgrades to the existing single family home. The renovation of the existing structure also includes the retention of existing floor area, with a slight reduction to the front entrance area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The value of property depends on the highest and best use improvements on the site and the market factors of supply and demand. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by development within the office zoning. The development includes the renovation of a vacant single story building into a small office with fagade and landscape enhancements. Based on current office space market values we anticipate the value of the renovated office space and site improvements (not including land) to be approximately $ 270,000. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Any medical waste will be picked up by a licensed collection company so as not to adversely affect the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. There are no other known adverse health impacts related to the project. The project minimizes the driveway width from McMullen Booth Road and incorporates a 5 ft concrete sidewalk from the front door to the Public Right of Way to enhance the safety of the project. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The driveway is proposed in the same location as the existing entrance to the site with adequate turning radii from the road. The proposed parking is located within a paved parking area in front of the existing building. The ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP conversion of the existing single family home to a small office building will include a minor increase in traffic that is diminutive to the existing traffic flow on McMullen Booth Road. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The project includes the renovation of an existing house into a small office building. The proposed use is consistent with the existing zoning and land use. The character of the development will be an enhancement to the surrounding older buildings and set a standard for the future redevelopment of the adjacent properties. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The project includes a landscape buffer along the north and south property lines, with no development in the rear of the existing building. The project is a small office building with minimal impacts to adjacent property. The hours of operation will be from 8:00am to 5:00pm consistent with other office space along McMullen Booth Road. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ATTACHMENT C • RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is requesting a decrease in the side yard setback from 20 feet to 10.82 feet to the existing building. The project includes the renovation of the existing structure, which is currently 7.10 feet from the side property line. The redevelopment of the parcel is therefore impractical without the deviation since it is an existing condition. The requested code deviations include the following: • Reduction in the south side setback from 20 feet to 7.10 feet (existing building) and 7.32 feet (proposed sidewalk). • Minimum lot width from 100 feet to 63.75 feet (existing lot width). • Reduction in the north side setback from 20 feet to 6.00 feet (pavement) and 10.82 feet (building). • Reduction to landscape buffer along north property line from 12 feet to 10.82 feet (to existing building), and 5.00 feet (to sidewalk). • Reduction to landscape buffer along south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), 9.73 ft (to back of curb/parking), and 7.32 feet (to sidewalk). • Reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet in front. The project includes the redevelopment of an existing one story residence to a doctor's office. The site is already zoned Office. The proposed includes a small reduction in the building area and renovation of the interior space to include two exam rooms, office space and reception area. The existing building, when converted to the current usage allowed under the site zoning, requires a minimum of four parking spaces and associated stormwater retention. These requirements are accommodated in front of the existing structure and adjacent to McMullen Booth Road. This proposal minimizes the improvements in the rear of the property adjacent to the single family homes. Due to the existing narrow lot width, setback and landscape width reductions are required to accommodate the existing building, and required parking dimensions. The parking and other impervious areas are minimized by the use of minimum parking requirements. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this office project. The adjacent office is an older existing house converted to an office use. The redevelopment of an office building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of the abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for office is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining office parcels. The proposed reductions are permissible via the City's Flexible Development standards. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed office use of the property is consistent with adjacent office uses north of the project and provides a buffer between a major arterial roadway and the adjacent residential properties to the east. The use is also consistent with the County Future Land Use designation 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The parcel currently contains one abandoned house zoned "Office". There are no other parcels in the immediate desired area available that are compatible with this zoning and Future Land Use designation. In addition, the applicant has owned the property for some time with the hopes of developing the structure into a family owned business. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed office development will replace one abandoned house and greatly upgrade the immediate vicinity with fagade and landscaping and stormwater upgrades. The current building is an older single family house with no landscaping. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFP 9 0 The proposed investment made in the property by redevelopment of an abandoned building will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent office property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable office space to increase the tax base of the City. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The flexibility in regard to required side setbacks is due to the location of the existing structure and the dimensional requirements of the 19-foot parking and 24 foot driveway isle. The request is justified by the redevelopment of a vacant older home located on a busy major roadway, and converting it into a usable small medical office space. The new use provides the best and highest use for the property, and provides a service benefit to the surrounding community. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEARWATEP .1 • Planning and Development Services O 100 South Myrtle Avenue clei lvater Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 -4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 L) 0, SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION K SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan 0 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials):. ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: / WEST: / EAST: / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) APPLICANT NAME: ftn(/A?- >G?? ? firO??? I TI IGN4? MAILING ADDRESS: -7 PHONE NUMBER: '77-,61 9 ° [lam FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): I/?IG lG- ?Y TZ?}-? I 441 G nY (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) _ re=rTa-( Z,A`(G ?? • . MAILING ADDRESS: 71{?7 PHONE NUMBER: T7,7--'7Y-3- l r 9 FAX NUMBER: 7 2? `?93- The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. Rao Ue 1 of 3 ORI SF' Q Z? C y Eli M4 1 OF ?Iro?c?.??IYi111_.t { 2. 3. C01Z7 b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. ??1.?? ORIGINAL D ; I, SEP 0a8 2005 PLAN; 0 0 4 Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Please return checklist for review and verification. Date: (Signature of applicant) ORIGINAL S: application forms/development review/comprehensive1Andscape program ?pplication..do i Page 3 of 3 SEP 0 8 2005 i I • • HICKEY OFFICE BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS NARRATIVE lb. The proposed landscape plan includes a viburnum hedge and canopy tree buffer around all property lines. A 6 ft. high fence is being constructed along the rear property line adjacent to the single family homes to provide additional buffering. The existing trees currently located in the rear yard are being saved as part of this development application. An additional intermediate focus tree is being planted along the front of the parking lot. 2. No accent lighting is proposed. 3. Currently the existing site contains several distressed shrubs and trees without any viable buffer or accent planting. The proposed program will provide an enhanced planting and irrigation design to completely screen the proposed parking lot, a buffer hedge around all property lines and additional canopy trees around the property lines. The additional hedge buffer located behind the building and additional fence will provide screening to the residences and adjacent properties along McMullen Booth Road. 4. The proposed landscape treatment continues the redevelopment of the adjacent office properties. This trend is transforming existing houses in disrepair into viable office space. The upgrades to the landscaping and fence materials will have a significant financial and visual benefit to the surrounding property values. 5. The treatment includes a shrub buffer hedge, intermediate focus tree and canopy trees to provide a tiered effect to fully buffer the proposed parking lot. ORIGINAL SEP 0 8 2005 M dN 4' .1 1-1 I-I/3N ?1 s.t=. p F ND?S ¢ '0 + >r IMU 1. r Mwe M a 1/a• pnt Orerrrn b : 2 Cacr ti ? F ev?M IMII?MIPOD pLL Mln !Me! rmSn reFlwcAAT 1:'... ..1u\R dr? STRAIGHT CURB EXISTING SIDEWALK Q CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE F- T1DCK, 3000 PSI 6- F R R T IB MESH CONC E E E W/ 6 O RE MESH RE MESH WELDED WI co z it, 9 JJ- .e•oNKNOB (1) R-1 STOP SIGN A 24• STOP BAR 4' CONC. SIDEWALK 20'X20' .GHI VISIBILITY TRIANGLE A B- STRAIGHT OUR PER ?? dlY INDEX /101 - _,ZL - 1 _ r *I 25' REWIRED +N FRONT SETBACK 1 C +J i? U I I ? I / ',i III (1) H C. RAMP W/J / i UNCAIEO DOMES PER FOOT INDEX /704 SAW CUT AT NEAREST) 295- JOINT AND RESTORE EXISTING S' SIDEWALK AND HANDRAIL 6• STRAIGHT CURB DISTURBED AREA SHALL J CITY INDEX BE COMPACTED TO 1001 fi- THICK CONCF AASHTO T99 AND SODDED PAVEM H.C. STALL d SIGN 3' WIDE CONIC FLUME CITY INDEX /1118 A HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL (TYF.) GRAPFBC SCALE (Wn)WI 1 V \ - N R ¦ (TYP) IWKAL R 1-1 P/M PXMl-OI-WAY PRDVOSED e• s)RUwT GIRe I^? wlACCT ealoAPr I 1 FDUI PAVDKDT SECRW O W FWO ANDSCAPE AREA lJ'? z L.J I Q U? a S r 2 4a 3 I- ? ? e F GENERAL NOTES: 1. ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC A ASSOCIATES, NO. 701 ENTERPRISE RD E. SUITE 404 ??---? R `S`AFETY NARBGR R 34595 °°6 izi ai ' ApNO ? C' ` ? -aa s5 i. PLC- j )} 2 ?TE ADDRESS (2? LOT MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD CLEARWATER R 33159 c?a ?• _ ) 1 P/ftCEL D: , 16/29/16/00000/210/0500 x Y = w US 1? E 3yk 4T USE RESIDENTIAL o 00 ` ? :!:. . 4• CONC. BARREL STO RAGE RAGE ? 4. PROPOSED USE: OR1CE Bil&DWG V.F W/ a' OPAQUE WOOD FENCE + A CATS ??_ 1 S. TOTAL SITE AREA --`` 1 11,502.19 SF (0.26 AC) A/C PAp ? 8. ElDST. BLDG FDDiPRINT 1,665.90 Si (0.14 FAR) ?i 1 .oUgA ), SETBACKS eEp1@ED EBfBOSED 1r I GI'I` 1 25.00' FRONT 61.11' (WEST TO BLDG) 84' 1 I 1 18.1 T' (NEST 10 B.O.CJ EXISTING BLDG EXISTING CONC. SEPTIC TANK 4 DRAI FIE D TO REMAI . . . 1 1 I I E Am- (NdtiN TO B.O.C) EXIST FFE-31.60 1 393 00 SF N- L N . I 7.10' (SOUTH 10 BLDG.) 4 (SOUTH TO SOEWALN) 0 ' ¢ q : . - m =. ? '-2 jW?I A K 20.00' REAR 84 (EAST 1p BLDG) OD C) _______________ ___ _ _____________ _______ _ ____ & ALLOWABLE MA% HEIGHT 30-SO' FT 1 PROPOSED BLDG HEIGHT 11' FT m ROOF "DPOWT U 0. SOLD WASTE SHALL BE A RO L WT TRASH CONTAINER X L O F -__ o- ? - &5.96' T 1Q DISTURBED GRASSED AREAS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SNALL BE SODDED. 9 H? 11. PARKWG T,AB TION T O:1 ¢ SPACESN REWIRED: n 2 SIP^?.-ky PER 1.000 Sf OF GROSS FLOOR AREA i (7) I1.34L 00 SF GROSS FLOOR AREA) / (/.ODD SF) K 4 4 AAA9P FFEEES REQUIRED • Z y C U OA fi' W\YL FENCE 16 SPACES PROMOED: 1 3 STANDARD . 1 HANDICAP - 4 TOTAL A 6 G 6' HIGH VINYL FENCE 12. A SEP RATE C04PREMENSIVE SIGNAGE PAOUGE "LL BE SUBMITTED. p p g iX C 11 SJV DATA TABLE EMZ& ameomk 6EMr8? A MT. SIZE AREA: n302N 4 (63110 1Lb3K 9 (4M AO 1100 Y MIS & TOTAL OPEN 9ACE: ),®. W 4 (ADD AD) ),•pn S (6G At) A104W 4 MM C 13 A AREA: UMS10 7 01• FAR) I— S (4M !NO •.Om 9 MM (4.0 !Ah 0. 50EWAlN/MIX/PAWO AREA L9K1.00 St 2615)b A 4/A SvoW IIM_...nrA E TOTAL MPU NXI AREA SAl&A 5( (6T LWO •AOnn W (4]A 6y IOM.M s YAY (411 . {j o- /3' m Mm T ? F. PARIWG SPALSS 25P • 34N6 R(fIiRD G W WtlRAR PAAMB T MfA VIPiI 9' 206110 9' ?Yno -, ? I M WTEMOR IAIOSCAR AREA O.m4 4004 +•F0041M0l gDNWO) ee B A WO OISAWID 14. THERE ARE NO ENMRWMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS "I/1W THE STE. t A [r 9: Wirt Wm Mr OMTT RNC 15. THERE ARE NO KNOWN EASEMENTS "T"N THE SITE. TH R R 1& E A E E NO WETLANDS "THIN 1HE STE. + mMS Y "N 17. ALl EXTERIOR UGHDNG "LL BE MOUNTED TO BLDG. 1& A FIRE INSPECTION MUST BE CALLED FOR AND PASSED PRIOR TO rma ?? OCCUPANCY OF THE BLDG Pa~ 19, BLACK BARREL CONTAINERS "LL BE PLACED NEXT TO THE PAVEMENT ON Mc MIALEN :.-{;.. r'I 1 •: •.::: ?.: + BOOTH ROAD FOR PICK UP BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SOLID WASTE DEPT. ?a a2 1 0 - ? uv?lL ar nwlm ){ }=} SHELT HANDICAPPED SIGN DET\IL SITY 3 20 00' 50E 10 82' (Ntlt1H TO BLDG ) of 5 GRAPHIC SCALE Z IL' ILJ Ill .vna o.mr..n ANAUa t fA011,1aUY.[n PLNIRq pFTM PLANT UST v«.pY., ur.l9m .• uK (,z NrJ ? ,Vape?wpea.IMka.tnw YPl.,lty xr.YUnJAwy ,s va nrowmmeoe.u.. vp.n.ypo.?p,rt.)aaa BARRICADE K .A GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES e? v ,. JN tana.eepe e«am mr .nd o.N oYnuro e.e.. r na:rw ro wau. r av?ram «?e we?,.l• w+Y..n rYa preaK .a S U x. .%a rmr.rleY .a N Y.r..'v pr.e. . .aN.a 0 ?' ... n'w ska Iowa'. •crou. a,p veeum 1« Yv=n Pl?a•. " cor r ' } 3 /- _ irA? ? ? 9 9>??..e , J. N aeNn am N aer Y pe.erae„e..un ,N ruin wr..rTmp: em ame•. AscYr a««.e a«a> Q q IJ ? @ a ? °a ? a ae9 N ,NA.e .nn waem 2o,o-J b9YY .. w W m.«.. ron.le. N .«u+«Y .nn L R C I TREE PLANTING DETAIL «pen ono mn. q '"°„ I..PenieN ° J.pewe Jpx .ppe °"° « A eTMenepN° M W. N W °?'°. e 4M ?' M ?• ? wo ? ? ????? Ki.A e m o C.b4 imM u'N"egv .wu-'c'!q m9«.l. tl f n ee.p u w roeb..las ...1. el. N pYnWn u.u arrA r.nA. a J- Y!e a rueel.a Ime.m.1 leg mpcK .Irkn Y ro N .Nr.E-N aXw F?NNIYn tN ? Nerela .pNer Y w...n,.p r. W mpmrYnp. a W Ipnv,peu cenasbr. I ...a a . ar..romx $ + +? eN..,rm ro <mtee.vY e. '"' peN epe W pren, Jn. W wen am ««al. pYrrY ere. pea m. mntmer, ena .pm9n ro.pvww. Nr .'.,.m re, n?u,9rp .pemmuem .Np N ren«N o pna nDl®a a tN cmnrm,Ne open,.. ? + + - + ° e,e aena°ro. ecaYm en weYa ro enero.. N YuNp..m. N pp««.e a, W w r« ..? n.c wY can W sY «a W Na ae.,,r..... v?r.pae. ,aIc«.r.a« .mp N _ Y + + ? « ? Y1bn w IeA.. b r.pm l?aa ammabam maw of a e d peep meve v9ro « .m..n? p :e?9 a w p roMbq « Iw .rrv..n W pM larro.cape C«encr« a W Vine a '90.s'9. ? y cunxar .Np N r.y«.YM ,w ocv9q u mt...an epp9cuY pen9Y ue fcmea le p.namr ,,. tn. lar o pin ? bM N tN. pim M ml W .pKakaerr ? o oru ,]. s ep.cF?e wig a., a .wcn flm. W T aRN,.a N mt9Ye q n ? .q a inin?se cnenpo. ? PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) tx ue w oloe mvr:rn W wen .., «u/« .p«akakm .lw N ancNe to W LerbceN awl.el Y?r a ]pa k , a ' oe. aN N ro em « en.paYm .mua ,N ue ap«wd a W e. 14. ,A. 1N Is^e.cep. C«auc,« +a 9roam. N .nitro. pon, o..nan t« a prow a u.n. (,]) m.an. tmm rai a«ea«s. w w a.w. .pr.p.m.. a.. 10. 6mr.ku ro N !wf-awpM N IM LeYCeN bnYacmr prl.r ro ,mbcW. rM.net YaeNYe,. p' . a NO ?p«Y. YvYae,a, ro W e.mr. leN. N D«Reakn. av/ .H mvlMe MW W le a - ? ? . an r ppw?iW w .pu 4- pct romper wM proper wit M lpria.Cepe C«lucb? a no ee61i«wl tint n ¦ A3 N W Y tk ?ryYu..?' » ro q.e m ra t0. N prtMAO q IM Y.bYrn mnuec,w ur• oriwau .p.cllxM2 «eW N q Q ,9. w caomi« .avarmaen .qm .ne. M pemuu en W prepc,...c.p, r« W proM Nlemnpen oPO ° Q ] ? UP trs xa uY,pn .ee ae. N mr°ve m rK.°.«2 e«emapl. ?». a«+*p.. ` G] f=?• G' 5 132 ],..mM9 «.° ura «. a.Y.em won W 'erb.c.p. N.te.aYn o.e N rmmr Y U W pit Ycra 22. iN I- e«nmu« a N rap«.kY t« W ea«r«r. r.pwx ma prw.. awp.a a om pne e9 a.arY G. w ° D: E- 0. L) ('' I . HpR pAMP p.mAYa wr9n W N.ro.ae, a aY «aYn. e N Ne a d w ¢ a v ) z 0 O O d a d Q ? dip t 2)? 3? .e2 °p a . xJ N «.m an«Ne .AnN .ron, x a 1 U G] ? • •, i IRRIGATION NOTES T c"?.J I 1 I , .urine kn9e,Yn .ra.+ti ,b w«iou ,pm[ c.urw. ,e u. papeweurq., y? a ' `• o GI o ` Lit ? 1 ' ] fI M e.xm.a ua oelolYa q W Caprm,« b pY., eap eea. PxNen YI]p2t # 9 -' _ ------------ - - ---------- ' . ----------- ----- ? ' I ) up 11 T rl9eli.n Sf.Ym «re, rme «..e..e Y w me. ] iM Pe - e Roe.rmm. 0.a. eeu fa rt.wpuen, Naprnak aoNew.k., a....) em, e e k. ro W W w ? 3 REWIRED 15 1 LANDSCAPE ta, ?" _ * 9 w « ?Pr«. p > .pnp„.Yn .rrep a.arv. vu, N u? a pmr'9 oMf . 1 BUFFER ( - o m , 1. pope, an .laem mua N impsW aq e«.pI.O A Gb P-j- I.®up.r I ? S j ? g ? b N.mbm. a nracn..rlWf mua rre., uY uE..utkn J-t2W.C Werla. Op11 eeuroe.. aM YMM a r.N ..nor erq Yemr. 1 1 I LI EXISTING BLDG EpgTIN. CpNC 5OEP7E1C TANK k DRAIN-I LO? T RMAIN I t / 1 A W ,«meo« ternr«,« m., .maw er pYe.v rn m-e p...-v t« W n/ ag mM u iN ,n p wm C N t a a a - T ? EXIST FFE=31 60 I n n w mw . . w « « «. : E % 0 . 1.393.00 SIF ? I T. Im Jaapn Mpoaan .p.,e. mrp«errY ei N na11,.4 s« .inn mwef«Nm b s a: ? REGUIRED 14= CYe+n. pm. c«roewnro c.- u. t [rob! t.WM. J.Y u ? H t LANDSCAPE ne.. nemaa a am,Yn avem vem ' n. I BUFFER - 2,Nm t N.artc wi.. - p• 9epb veY. m.. e e e ? - `C 0 0 1 11 0 0 J ? 0 0 5 --------°f- ------ --- - ? ' n h Z ?/ Q h l 0 O C• t 6• HIGH VINYL FENCE t t )OAK i TRfE9 TD BE REtxGVm= 9T 1OTAl 5 OF 5 ? ro ,aww? F,NG EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING PATIO COVERED OOM BEDROOM PATIO IIJ??•-- b EXISTING„ ' e;? }?--- ---- U- OATH EXISTING -n GARAGE K EXISTING -',-_ ?'•?""`-^ BEDROOM ___--J yq. -? EXISTING DINING EXISTING II KRCHEN - ii EXISTING LMNG n 4' If Elm ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 CITY OF FR EXO M0 PLM PLAN A o WALL LEGEND ms,w •AU m wr?w ?I _ _ _ oaana wt m et iaom ? ?? wrt .i n,o.u, r.ei ra amaa ]'N' wwo solos AT iC d11flIm11?IM 1!Y OMIIM AT GOI !)[. ,RNQ WRA ROtli M!Y lDllw AT ALL ?T IGI'A110N? xmvATw PLO= PLAN ,r.. ^^ wee. R V/ a. W UJ U 2 In d ?wtt ? J? A-W - NOTE: 1.A , o A ROO. ?nGMe ro Wuw oRlw ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER !011TH 6l11ATIOR 3 w..,e A7.1 0 NORTH GrYAT10H A-7.1 1111 N liM W ,M1[ roar ro wtw oattra _ _ - - - - - oaua mExr wwTta m ? rwttta ranw rwr mat aos, ,wnaR ,a,[i w10, OOSIW E 31PRU M a.a?r NOTE: t. Au taw ooatt iao aootr turns m wtw Dena >. u?r ai ntno atn ttaa Hoot m reuuutta, MNT RUATION I A-1.t R ffoo RACT aztA ON P, N W Y" VU 2 i Y =w •4 fA li u? A tl • A,-?' ? j'L ' -jv) ---7 N 01} NEW ENTRY DOOR FRONT ELEVATION NOTE: 1. ALL NEW DOOR AND WINDOW HEIGHTS TO MATCH EXISTING 2. VERIFY ALL FINISHES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION i? ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NEW 40 YEAR DIM SHINGLE COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING CEMENT PLASTER TO BE PAINTED PORTER PAINT COLOR 6892-1 ANTIQUE VELVET TRLISS BEARING MATCH EXISTING 1-VTHKx4WIDE" DECORATIVE CEMENT PLASTER BANDING TO BE PANTED PORTER PAINT COLOR 6891-1 NEWPORT TINT I-Y2"THKx12WIDE" DECORATIVE CEMENT PLASTER BANDING TO BE PANTED PORTER PAINT COLOR 6891-1 NEWPORT TINT RO R U 0 d w U_ 0 i w e Id i! e « . d ? i 0 i R-1 Calculations Using the Most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report Description/ITE Code Units. "Ezpect6d, Expected P.M Peak PM In PM Out Umts . 'Daily Trips ; Trips - Total: .. Truck Terminal 030 Aces EXISTING General Light Industrial 110 TSF Gross Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross Single Family Homes 210 DU 1.0 10 1 1 0 Apartments 220 DU - Mobile Home Park 240 DU Assisted Living 254 DU All Suites Hotel 311 Rooms Motel 320 Rooms Marina 420 Berths Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross Church 560 TSF Gross Daycare Center 565 TSF Gross General Office 710 (Equation) TSF Gross general Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross Building Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Available Not Available Shopping Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross -Lunch Hour Traffic' Shopping Center 820 (Rate) TSF Gross Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross Total In Out High Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Drive Thru Only 935 TSF Gross Not Available »»»> No calculations but studies sho Service Station 944 Fuel Position Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position Tire Store 848 Service Bas Not Available Supermarket 850 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt (Open 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt (Open 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Not Available Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pumps 853 TSF Gross Discount Club 861 TSF Gross Pharmac /Dru store w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross 'Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross Walk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In:Lanes CD r 0 d.; U jtl ii i t I w1unch Peak 146-364 two way trips 9 • 10 I:\Hickey\Permits\City\[tripcalc_16111 04-26-05 existing. xls]Calculations 29-Jul-05 Calculations Using the Most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report DescriptionJITE Code Units Expected, Units , Expected;:'. Daily Trips, PM Peak Trips -Total RM In PM Out Truck Terminal 030 Acres PROPOSE General Light Industrial 110 TSF Gross Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross Sin le Family Homes 210 DU Apartments 220 DU Mobile Home Park 240 DU Assisted Living 254 DU All Suites Hotel 311 Rooms Motel 320 Rooms Marina 420 Berths Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross Church 560 TSF Gross Daycare Center 565 TSF Gross General Office 710 (Equation) TSF Gross 3eneral Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross 1.6 58 6 2 4 Building Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Available Not Available Shopping Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross Lunch. Hour Traffic Shopping Center 820 (Rate) TSF Gross Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross Total In Out High Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross 0 0 9 Drive Thru Only 935 TSF Gross Not Available - »»»> No calculations but studies sho Service Station 944 Fuel Position Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position Tire Store 848 Service Ba s Not Available Supermarket 850 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt (Open 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt (Open 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Not Available Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pumps 853 TSF Gross Discount Club 861 TSF Gross Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross Valk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In Lanes v'Lunch Peak 146-364 two way trips J? V O • as o z a I:\Hickey\Permits\City\[tripcalc_16111 04-26-05 proposed. x1s] Calculations 29-Jul-05 • Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning • 701 Enterprise Rd. E., Suite 404 Safety Harbor, .FL. 34695 (727) 793=9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzavae.com Hickey Office Building Improvements 107 McMullen Booth Road Clearwater, Florida Parcel ID 16-29-16-00000-210-0500 27° 58' 1.59" 820 42' 30.12" Drainage Report Issued: 9/8/2005 Prepared By: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 ORIGINAL . RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1- 0 0 313-04 Hickey Office PROJECT NARRATIVE EXISTING: The Hickey Office Building exists as a single building with parking. The site is located on the south side of Drew Road and is east of McMullen Booth Road in Clearwater, Florida. Adjacent to the south is a single family home, directly to the north is an Attorney's office. The existing project drainage basin drains to the west and then south to an existing storm drainage system of McMullen Boot Road. The remainder of the site behind the existing building sheet flows to the east and does not drain to the project limits. PROPOSED: Four proposed parking spaces will be installed on the property. The existing building, existing pavement to remain and proposed pavement will be directed to the new west retention area.. Since the majority of the existing pavement is remaining and being incorporated into the project, and not being removed, full credit is taken for the existing impervious area. The storm water quality and quantity for the West: One half inch of runoff from this drainage area will be treated. The pond will also provide detention of the runoff from a 25 year storm. The pond is sized to detain the difference of the post development runoff rate minus the pre-existing rate. SUMMARY: In summary, the pond will provide water quality for the project area and quantity controls for the improvements. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 131006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1AHickey\Permits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc Location Map 313-04 Hickey Office - T 5$41} h7!i 4 f; gri ? Q3?4{lTt Arbr ftVV+ C? ` SSrl JOSE St ?? ;.? SITE N,a f oytAvc ! ? Oro1V St i 7 L tJ 0?Gr[ 1,J)- iW 7t _ _ Gulf To BOy Blvd cts _ _.:. .. ay" ?i <ar 0 iipearea Dr ? TunM?a lc?{ VAL ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1AHickey\Pemlits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 3,13-04 Hickey Office TOPOGRAPHY .w:. .., a .?? f1 ?OD5,;I;?and'.?`,;3ga.cam, I1${} ; .?; ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I:\Hickey\Pemiits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER • 313-04 Hickey Office Aerial r k ?? t Y ?{1 ?'. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I:\Hickey\Permits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc • • 313-04 Hickey Office Survey - Existing Condition ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I:\Hickey\Permits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc • CITY OF CLEARWATER wa I.aS '^H la"Iotd Hs ....a PKIX JO wNa.43 6a0y?Of /ONIMYEO L?? * A3MJH ]cMtlyd ?? tcoH ST. ?,v„ o.m. .wwa/P YO.1Y"a ailaall AO'L 0689-SS9 (ft9)XY! Zffl-tS9 (f19) :Hd ?P 8-7 5 NOLLONLLSH00 - 31HdYa00d01 - ANYOHnOe Iw?LYmWvW* Wore1-11008?4 601 e 11t• ?Y T"?le awlfo?r as Nem psiaf .!?? Ye°:"'i= u-'iw'°rw`'.??.? r rte' cL9+f 'Y-u 'arIKOlO --- (3WA31n08;S3XY1 LS3803 Ll l A-=~r --4HwY'aoodol "" u s:awnna L??[ 'JNIkSA2IRS QNr LSVoomfis s -Ya 3? ? •, ?. 3 a`?; G? S E >< S a ? zga r 3 ;? t g E v ? _e ? 1 a CC Q E d t S a ` aB ? $ $ 6 ? Y ?? ? R T = h?? CFY ? E. ? ? ? h Y.d €a5 ? . ?? 9 ?is? S ?1 c d E tl? 4 0 I tr .? •.+,y 2E_ P e?+wWr reads a e ; q ,. a,y y? -aa o,". ? ? P O ??Q ?IIli *+ ? '` ,P ?jb @I '. •? ?5P '5 " ?j ?4 ?;? P4 i T4P 2! 3a, 'ti' q Y? ptv6 416[[CS -? ', e OYOa NlOoo OB N7TIA/fom ORIGINAL 8 Or i tt §g €€ I?i9;;;8 iitBB3i1891a?933?i19;?a1?1 RECEIVED .b?.e?oe..uae+..eal •!•55.55F:I(e21iEi4d4id MAC 13 2006 ?I e??aI? ? FIf? r???81;? ?g ? f? ?? PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3???7??yhF3s?IabIQfl?e arE CITY OF CLEARVt,ATF.,R 3 aoo,A:,I,LeE,;.n..,6r"::t1:9st{?xA?:4?beY.yE: m -< 0,- :A-22-t O , 0 0 313-04 Hickey Office Proposed Development ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I:\Hickey\Permits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER • 3 t 3-04 Hickey Office APPENDIX A DRAINAGE INFORMATION ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT L\Hickey\Pemiits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER • • 313-04 Hickey Office PRE & POST DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Pre-Developed Condition: Prior to the proposed remodeling of the south building, the site does not detain the runoff from site. Post-Developed Condition: In the post-developed condition, the runoff from the additional parking area and the relocated parking will be routed through the proposed storm water pond. The dry pond will treat the first half inch from the site and also provide attenuation from a 25 year storm. The overflow will be directed into the Pinellas County storm drain. The McMullen Booth road drainage swales maintain the water table at approximately elevation 26 by the use of underdrains. The drainage calculations show an elevation 27 as a safety factor. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1:\Hickey\Permits\Stonn Water Report\Stonnwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 313-04 Hickey Office Soils Map The soils are indicated on the soils map for the site as "My", Myacca fine sand. Myacca fine sand is highly permeable ("6 to 20 inches per hour") sands. fAn t Tc ? - Fuji B,, Om, 1AHickey\Permits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc Ts VJa M ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 313-04 Hickey Office DRAINAGE CALCtILATI*NS ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 13 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I:\Hickey\Permits\Storm Water Report\Stormwater REPORT 7-28-05.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER Hickey 9/8/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER Hickey Office 313-04 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS 9/8/2005 1 Required Trea tment Acreage . Square Feet 1/2 inch Cu Feet Acre Feet 0.141 6141.96 0.5 256 0.006 <Amount needed to treat 2 Attenuation FDOT ZONE VI: Tc=60 min i=3.7 inches per hour C existing calculation: Square Feet C 3616 Existing impervious area (so @ 0.95 3435.2 1458 Existing gravel areas (SF) @ 0.50 729 0 Existing pond area (sf) @ 1.00 0 1068 Existing pervious area (sf) @ 0.20 213.6 sum 4377.8 0.71 <Existing C C proposed calculation: 4224 Impervious area (sf) @ 0.95 0.95 4012.8 0 Gravel areas (SF) @ 0.5 0.50 0 696 Pond area (sf) @ 1.0 1.00 696 1221.96 Pervious area (sf) @ 0.2 0.20 244.392 sum 4953.192 0.81 <Proposed C Volume needed = tiA (Cp -Ce) t 3600 • i 3.7 A 6141.96 Cp 0.81 Cu Feet (Acre Feet) 0 '; Ce 0.71 176 0.004 <Volume needed for storage z A Z 0 m r) m m ZZ > tv 23 ?D r Q" n'/ Z Hickey Dnnri Vnhima _n O m n r- T m z z Z v rn D M mm z 3 m N m C? m m o ?r 0 rn 9/8/2005 Pond To Elevation 30.50 Water table 27 Pond Bottom Elevation: 29.50 Area of Pond at To El. sf : 696.00 0.02 K sand ermeabilt ,ft per hr): 0.325 Area of Pond at B ottom(sf): 89.00 0.00 Side Sloe 4 Safe Factor dimensionless : 2 Increment 0.50 lavg v AVG. FLOW AREA OF AVERAGE AT ET E h' Oh TOTAL ENGTH THR HYDRAULIC OND BOTTO FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL ELEV. TOTAL HEAD INCR. HEAD VOLUME OND BOTTO GRADIENT A=(L)(h) Q=KiA (Q1+Q2)/2 TIME TIME (NGVD) (ft) (ft) (cf) (ft) I=h/lavg (ft`) (cfh) (cfh) (hrs.) (hrs.) 30.500 3.250 0.050 393 2.00 1.625 0.0 0.0 0 0 30.450 3.200 0.05 358 2.00 1.600 89.0 23.1 11.57 2.942 2.942 _..____......----.._...... 30.400 ....... ...__..._______ 3.150 ..___._...... ..._............. .. 0.05 _.__.__ .,........... ....... 326 2.00 1.575 89.0 22.8 22.96 1.417 4.359 30.350 3.100 0.05 295 2.00 1.550 89.0 22.4 22.60 1.372 5.731 30.300 3.050 0.05 265 2.00 1.525 89.0 22.1 22.24 .... 1.326 ......... .__._...__._..___. 7.057 30.250 3.000 0.05 237 2.00 1.500 89.0 21.7 21.87 1.279 8.336 _......... _........ ..._... 30.200 2.950 0.05 ______._.____. ._.._.......... 211 2.00 1.475 89.0 21.3 21.51 1.230 9.565 30.150 2.900 0.05 186 2.00 1.450 89.0 21.0 21.15 1.179 10.744 30.100 2.850 0.05 163 2.00 1.425 89.0 20.6 20.79 1.126 11.871 30.050 2.800 0.05 141 2.00 1.400 89.0 20.2 20.43 1.072 12.943 30.000 2.750 0.05 120 2.00 1.375 89.0 19.9 20.07 1.016 13.959 29.950 2.700 0.05 102 2.00 1.350 89.0 19.5 19.71 0.957 14.916 29.900 2.650 0.05 84 2.00 1.325 89.0 19.2 19.34 0.897 15.813 29.850 2.600 .0.05 68 2.00 1.300 89.0 18.8 18.98 0.834 16.647 -..--..__..___... _.... _._._................_ 29.800 ...._....... _..... __........... ...___ 2.550 ...._._.._........_.-.......... .............. 0.05 ___.__........_._._....___..__ -.............. ..... 54 2.00 1.275 89.0 18.4 18.62 0.769 17.416 29.750 -..... ._............. ...... 2.500 ._..-.__,......- ._..-......................... 0.05 __.. _._............. -..... ..__......... _..... ................. 41 2.00 1.250 89.0 18.1 18.26 . 0.701 18.117 .._--........ ,......__..........._ ........ .............. ..... 29.700 .....-,......_,....._...... ............".. 2.450 ....... ......... __.._..........,,..........__........ 0.05 ....,.......,......._,.......... ......... .._.....................-..... 30 2.-00 __.._......__.....__......_..._ 1.225 89.0 17.7 -._?_? _. 17.90 _. __ - 0.630 _.._ _ __._ 18.747 _.__........._._..9........................ ..._............. 2.650 ..........._....................................... 2.400 ..........._.........._..........._..................._ 0.05 ..................,._........_._.............................__...... 20 2.00 ......... __._.....__...._..._.__ 1.200 89.0 17.4 17.54 . . . _.._.__.... 0.557 _ ..... -_ _ 19.303 ...... ........ .... I ........... .....-.... 29.600 ................................ ................ ..... 2.350 .......... ....... _..... ............ _.......... ............. 0.05 ,.................... ............ ....,,........... ...._.............. ..... 12 2.00 ....... ....-.............,.._..... _,..,..,._..... 1.175 89.0 . 17.0 ......... _._-..... . ..... .. ....... 17.17 .__...._. ......_.......... .. 0.480 ......._.._._........ __.-_- 19.783 ----- --------------- 29.500 ---- --------- 2.250 ----------------- 0.000 .........._....................._........................................ 0 . ..... 2.00 --------------- 1.125 89.0 _-..._..... ....... .......... 16.3 ............................._............._ ------------- 16.63 -------------- 0.718 --- -------- 20.501 .... POND TREATMENT VOLUME RECOVERS IN: 20.5 HOURS NOTE: A SAFETY. FACT.OR OF "2".1-S APPLIED TO 'W" • 0 H ickey 9/8/2005 4 Weir Calculations Q existing C existing i A 0.371851699 0.7127692 3.7 0.141 Width of weir (ft) Weir factor 1.08 312 Q 0.110 3 1.122368923 0.371851699 Width of weir (inches) 1.3 5 Elevation of weir Area Avg. Area Volume Acc. Vol. Trt. Vol. Weir Elevation (Ac) (Ac) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) Elevation 29.50 0.0020 0.00000 0.0085 0.00425 30.00 0.0150 0.00425 0.0155 0.00775 0.0059 30.10 30.50 0.0160 0.01200 • ro ns 7 0z z +(7 ?0 m rn pm ? Ca < o 0 ? ? rn m m r7 z Calculated Weir Elevation: 30.10 Ft ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE , PERMIT APPLICATION Syr , 4 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER I i I `,. N I 1 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT I 1 2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSViLLE, FL 34604-6899 I (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 FOR-AGENCX..USE ONLY ACOE Apphcation:# DER/.WMD Application # -Date Received :; Date Received Proposed Proleet Latitude 0 Fee,Received'$ Proposed =Projec(Longitude a Fee Receipt# SECTION A PART 1: Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? ? yes Ono Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? o yes ano PART 2: A Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one) ? Noticed General - include information requested in Section B. ? Standard General (single family dwelling)-include information requested in Sections C and D. ? Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. V Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H. ? Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D. ? Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F. (Ifthe proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.) ? Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F. B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one) R( Construction or operation of a new system, including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters. (If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit/ application, please provide previous permit ? Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. ? Modification ofa system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit# and check applicable modification type. ? Alteration of a system 0 Extension of permit duration ? Abandonment of a system ? Construction of additional phases of a system ? Removal of a system C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. o yes ra'no If_.yes,:include the information: requested in Section G. D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested: 0 Individual ? Programmatic General ? General ? Nationwide EYONot Applicable E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? Dyes q/no If yes, provide rule number if known FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A Click here to reset "For Agency Use Only." Page 1 of 5 ORIGINAL V N L? O E2, t C3 i r • 1 • PART 3: A. OWNER(S) OF LAND L B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) i NAME i NAME i Patrick Hickey COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE ADDRESS ADDRESS 1775 Split Fork Dr., Oldsmar, FL 346,77 CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Clearwater, Florida 34677 TELEPHONE (813) 818-7366 TELEPHONE ( ) FAX ( ) FAX ( ) C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AN AGENT IS USED) AGENT) NAME NAME Keith Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. COMPANY AND 77TLE COMPANY AND TITLE Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc, President ADDRESS ADDRESS 701 Enterprise Road, E., Suite 404 CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 TELEPHONE ( ) TELEPHONE (727 ) 793-9888 FAX ( ) FAX (727) 793-985 PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION .-A. -Name of project, including. phase-if applicable:- Hickey _Office_Building. B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? • • yes • no C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: 0.29 acres D: Total project:area for which a permit-is sought°029" - -.- acres E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought 0.90 acres F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of-work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters: 0.00 acres or square feet ( hectares or square meters) G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: 0 r Vruv1 -)y l.L //?ICY(8-74)H rage z or.) ORIGINA11 co. I j f N i r C.? O ' r- • PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed) Countr(ies) Pine!ias • Section(s) Township Section(s) Township Land Grant name, if applicable Tax Parcel Identification Number 16-29-16-00000-210-000 Street address, road, or other location 107 McMullen Booth Road City, Zip Code, if applicable PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR ACTIVITY. Expansions of paar nii g ;ot and additio r, of stormwa.ter aitenuation[treatment pond. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 3 of 5 Range Range ORiGNAL V tt N i , C= LL{ PART 7: A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff, please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives. Date(s) Location(s) Names B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the proposed project site. Agency Date Number/ Type Action Taken C. Note: The following information is required for projects proposed to occur in on or over wetlands that need a federal dredqe and fill permit and/or authorization to use state owned submerged lands. Please provide the names, addresses and zi codes of property owners whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant and/or is located within a 500 foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations if any) Please provide , . a drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if needed). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5- 6 • ---?-?-" , N FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 4 of 5 ?-?-_ -r-n i, OWGINAL -D ? . C= 0 0 PART 8: By signing this application form, lam applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit and/or proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information filed with this application. I am familiar with the inforr,tation contained in this application, and represent that such information is true complete and accurate. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. I understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit or proprietary authorization issued pursuant theretc, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation entity. Patrick Hickey Typed/Printed Name of Owner, Applicant Or Agent Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of Owner Date B. AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED: I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above, and to furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above. Typed/Printed Name of Owner or Applicant Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of Owner or Applicant Date C. PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmental Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted. Patrick Hickey Typed/Printed Name Corporate Title, if applicable Signature Date D. I certify that the engineering features of this surface water management system have been designed by me or under my responsible charge and in my professional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all applicable. rules and specifications. I further agree that Ior'my engineering-firm-will furnish the applicant/ permittee with a set ofguidelines and schedules for maintenance and operation of the surface water management system. By: Signature of Engineer of Record ! AFFIX SEAL ! Date: Phone: (727 793-9888 Keith-E= Zayac, P. E. 48192 Name (please type) FL P.E. No. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc Company Name 701 Enterprise Road, E, Suite 404 Company Address Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 City, State, Zip J C-7) i C? O (, ? FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page S of S OWGNAL FLD2005-07077 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH Date Received: 07/29/2005 DOCTOR HICKEY'S OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT: O LAND USE: R/OL ATLAS PAGE: 292A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLWCoverSheet I • • J . 1 a ? ' n?I - R CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ??t MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ?40'ryTER? TELEPHONE 727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Lee Curtis David L. Wallace & Associates, P.A. 542 Douglas Avenue Dunedin, FL 34698 RE: FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Road Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Curtis: March 27, 2007 On March 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.8 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to six feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to ten feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a. Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (March 21, 2007). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On March 19, 2007, you submitted a request for a two-month time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited a problem of illness in the owner's immediate family that delayed completion of the architectural and engineering plans for submission for a building permit to construct the site and building improvements. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1/1 0 0 March 27, 2007 Curtis - Page Two Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for stacking between the right-of-way and parking spaces has been adopted into the Code requiring a minimum distance of 20 feet from the right-of-way line to the first parking space. This project was approved with a 16-foot distance between the right-of-way line and the first parking space. In considering the above change to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a two-month time extension to May 21, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 107 McMullen Booth Road. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsUfcMullen Booth 0107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - Approved 20061McMullen Booth 0107 Time Ext. Dev. Order 3.27.07.doc 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:17 PM To: 'Lee Curtis' Subject: RE: Hickey Office Building Lee - Attached is the Development Order for the Time Extension. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Lee Curtis [maiIto: lcurtis@d lwarchitects.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 4:16 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office Building Wayne, Attached is the extension request for the Hickey Office Building. Thanks, Lee Curtis Project Manager dlw architects 542 Douglas Ave. Dunedin, FL 34698 P: 727-736-6000 ext. 317 F: 727-738-8343 www.dlwarchitects.com Celebrating 25 Years 1981 - 2006 DISCLAIMER: David L. Wallace & Associates, P.A. (DL W) makes the electronically stored data available for information purposes only. No warranty either expressed or implied is made regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data. DLW reserves the right to revise, update, and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility for any images or errors which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to verify the data to ascertain its accuracy for the intended use. DLW makes every effort to ensure the data is virus free, however DLW assumes no responsibility for damages caused by the installation of this data. Use of this data indicates that user accepts the above conditions. 3/27/2007 d I [JU 0 40 david I. Wallace & associates p.a. architects To: The City of Clearwater Building Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave - Room 210 Clearwater, Fl. 33758 Attn: Wayne Wells ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 19 2007 Re: Building permit extension request Hickey Office Building 107 McMullen Booth Road To whom it may concern, PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The site plan for this project was approved on March 21, 2006. Due to an illness in the owner's immediate family, he requested that the project be put on hold until he could better tend to the project. Now that the situation has been resolved, he has asked us to complete the plans and submit them for permit as soon as possible. The plans are approximately 50% complete at this time and we can have them completed and submitted within approximately 60 days. We respectfully request an extension based on these circumstances. Please feel free to contact me if you desire further information. Very truly yours, Lee Curtis March 14, 2007 542 douglas avenue 727/736-6000 dunedin, florida 34698 FAX 738-8343 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Lee Curtis [Icurtis@dlwarchitects.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 4:16 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office Building Wayne, Attached is the extension request for the Hickey Office Building. Thanks, Lee Curtis Project Manager dlw architects 542 Douglas Ave. Dunedin, FL 34698 P: 727-736-6000 ext. 317 F: 727-738-8343 www.dlwarchitects.com Celebrating 25 Years 1981 - 2006 DISCLAIMER: David L. Wallace & Associates, P.A. (DL W) makes the electronically stored data available for information purposes only. No warranty either expressed or implied is made regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data. DLW reserves the right to revise, update, and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility for any images or errors which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to verify the data to ascertain its accuracy for the intended use. DLW makes every effort to ensure the data is virus free, however DLW assumes no responsibility for damages caused by the installation of this data. Use of this data indicates that user accepts the above conditions. 3/19/2007 "?f+r C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 22, 2006 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On March 21, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.8 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to six feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to ten feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR I31I.L JONSON, VICF-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIIMEMBER HOPI' HAMIIXON, COUNCB.MEMBER ® CARLEN A. P1'ITRSEN, COUNCIIMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AI.-FIRMATivl? AcriON 11 MPLOYER" March 22, 2006 Zayac - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That there be no plumbing in the conference room; 3. That there be no off-site parking within rights-of-way or on other private property, unless through a shared parking agreement acceptable to the Planning Department and recorded in the public records; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised acceptable to the Planning Department: a. increasing the amount of plant materials along the areas west of the building to provide "tiered" landscape effects (over the minimum landscape requirements); b. providing at least one additional tree specie; and c. providing the crape myrtle tree at least 2.5 inch caliper; 5. That the increased tree sizes (height and caliper) indicated on the landscape plan be installed; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised acceptable to Staff: a. providing wheel stops for the parking spaces; and b. relocating the proposed curb along the north side of the handicap access sidewalk to/from McMullen Booth Road to the south side of the sidewalk; 7. That the six-foot high solid vinyl fence along the south and east property lines indicated on the site plan be installed, with the height of the fence within the front setback reduced to a maximum of three feet; 8. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum six feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; and 9. That, prior to issuance of any permits, provide a copy of the approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County for the driveway expansion and a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (March 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. March 22, 2006 Zayac - Page 3 Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on April 4, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/,gov/dgpts/plannin;. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)llnactive or Finished ApplicationslMcMullen Booth 0107 Mickey Office Building #2 (O) - ApprovedlMcMullen Booth 107 Development Order.doc 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 6:47 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - Attached is the Staff Report that we are sending to the CDB. The CDB meeting will be at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, March 21, 2006. In order to be placed on the CDB Consent Agenda, Staff has to recommend approval (which we are), the applicant must accept the conditions of approval (if they are acceptable, please let me know by 10:00 am on Monday, March 20, 2006) and there can't be any letters of objection (there are still letters of objection of record from Marion Thompson and Johonna and Dr. Frank D'Amico). If both objectors were to send me letters retracting their prior objections, then this case could be placed on the Consent Agenda. Potentially you might approach them to see if they still have objections (specifically or generally) and whether they would retract their prior letters. Wayne IcMullen Booth 107 Staff Repor... • • Wells, Wayne From: keith@keithzayac.com Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 6:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Wayne we are all boxed up and will deliver Monday Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -----Original Message----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:45:23 To:<keith@keithzayac.com> Cc:<cbutler@dlwarchitects.com>,<Sherry.Watkins@myClearwater.com>, <neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com> Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - I have yet to receive any revised proposal for this request. The latest a revised Staff Report can be sent to the CDB is on Thursday, March 16, 2006. I am out of the office all day Tuesday and all Wednesday morning. The "window" to write any revised Staff Report, based on a changed design proposal, is quickly closing. My alternative is to send to the CDB for the 3/21/06 meeting the Staff Report without any revisions, which, in my opinion, may not be in your client's best interests. Please advise. Wayne 1 LI Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:50 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: 107 McMullen Booth Road, Hickey Keith - Any word as to when you will be getting me the revised submittal for Hickey? Time is running out for me to review the new proposal and write my staff report. Wayne CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT =`yATES????' POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ,0 MUNICIPAL SERVICI?s BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.E AVENUE, CI.FARWATFR, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW February 22, 2006 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Road) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on February 21, 2006, continued the above referenced request to their March 21, 2006, meeting. The request is for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for property located at 107 McMullen Booth Road. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. Sincerely, el k, CP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - 3.21.06 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 CDB Continuance Letter 2.22.06.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR I3111JONSON, VICE: MAYOR JOAN DOww, COUNCHAWNUSIT HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMHGR ® CARLEN A. PI IIi16EN, COUNC1 LNIBNIHER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AI'I'IRMATIVF ACTION EMPLOYER" • f Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:00 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Rd. Keith - Attached is a copy of the Staff Report for FLD2005-07077 for 107 McMullen Booth Road for the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting. Wayne L_J ? cMullen Booth 107 Staff Repor... 0 Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning February 9, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 • 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(a.keithzayac.com EB 9351 LC26000212 RE: HICKEY OFFICE BUILDING FLD2005-07077 -107 MCMULLEN BOOTH Dear Mr. Wells: Please accept this letter as a brief summary of the history of this project to be placed in the public record as part of the CDB member packages. The following is a consolidated list of activities which have occurred during the processing of this project: 1. A project site plan was originally approved on July 26, 2004. 1 have attached a copy of the Development Order and site plan reduction. This plan called for retaining 962.75 SF of the existing building and constructing three parking spaces in the rear yard. The project was accessed from McMullen Booth Road by a driveway fully on the subject property. 2. The project was put out to bid by the owner in the fall of 2004. Based on feedback from prospective bidders, it was determined that the proposed sewer connection to the existing system would require several hundred feet of roadway demolition, reconstruction and extension of an 8" sewer main to serve the small project. The cost of this off-site construction far exceeded the remainder of the on-site construction. 3. A tentative agreement with an adjacent property owner was negotiated by our client and we were directed to redesign the sanitary connection through a proposed side yard easement south of the project. After the completion of the revised design, the easement agreement was not consummated and we were unable to access the sewer main in the subdivision south of the project. 4. We were then directed by our client to revise the plan to maintain the existing septic tank in the rear yard and move the proposed parking to the front yard based on a conversation between our client and a City staff member no longer in service. The plans were revised to show the existing one story building to remain, along with a rear addition totaling 1608 SF and four parking spaces in the front yard. The parking is accessed by a 24 foot wide driveway and 5 foot wide sidewalk connecting to the existing public sidewalk. This design significantly reduced the proposed pavement and eliminated the parking in the rear yard adjacent to the residences to the east. 5. The plans were submitted and revised per DRC comments. Two major issues that came up during meetings with staff included providing a joint access, located on the comment property line, with the office building to the north and concerns about parking provided. • 11 6. Several meetings and telephone conversations took place with the property owner immediately north of the project to negotiate a joint access driveway to address staff concerns. After several months we were unable to negotiate an agreement and advised staff. We did however, add an additional turf block parking space for employee use only to bring the total spaces in conformance with the required 5.0 spaces. This additional space was deemed acceptable via email by the engineering staff during the review process. 7. Staff indicated in subsequent meetings that they would still require a joint access driveway and recommended denial of the project. 8. In order to further negotiate with the adjacent property owner north of the project, we requested two continuances at the previous CDB meetings. 9. To date we have not been able to negotiate a joint access driveway and intent to represent the project as submitted. Based on our continuing conversations I have contacted the adjacent residential property owners to review the project and addressopy concerns prior to the February CDB meeting. Sincerely, Keith E. ZayK P.E., RLA President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RmEw Mr. Keith Zayak Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc. 101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 July 26, 2004 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2004-04028 - 107 N. McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Zayak: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application for an office with (1) a reduction to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to six feet to pavement, (2) a reduction of the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), and (3) a reduction of the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) and as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. for the site at 107 N. McMullen Booth Road. Based on the application and the Staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the site plan application be revised to correctly state the required and provided parking, prior to building permit issuance; 2. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance; 3. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary connection prior to issuance of a building permit; 4. That an approved SWFWMD permit be provided prior to building permit issuance; 5. That a copy of a right-of-way permit from Pinellas County, for the driveway along McMullen Booth Road be provided prior to building permit issuance; BmAN f. AUNGs'I', MAYOR-COMMISSIUNh.R Hoyr HAMILTON, VICI` MAYOR-COMMISSIONI:R Wim I:Y GRm, COM?IIsSIUNER FRANK I111MARI), COMMISSIONER ® BILL_JONSOK, COMMLS?IONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMAlivE Ac-noN EMPLOYER" CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SO[FM MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 July 26, 2004 Keith Zayak, Page Two 6. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, by the applicant; 7. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located underground; and 8. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any attached signs, and low monument-style for a freestanding sign and be architecturally-integrated into the design of the building and site. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by July 20, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and, only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting.' The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 3, 2004. , If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, ai 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director SAPlanning DepartmenAC D B\FLEXVnactive or Finished Applications\McMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building (O) - Approved eMullen Booth 107 Development OrderJuly 26, 2004.doc • • ') 4?r $EOP O ary/ 1 8 $'Or O m Wj J r,., .., rrar wv4u rt. ruavaF CGnC XDE.w 5' Cp.C. $'X-V ' 0NaPlllt SctLE ? L EGENU riwl P,mJSL - N-1 wxr L iPwFFIC PANT W I 35' ry Ews NJG B [CAL 't ' LDG BLDG OFFICE EE-x ST FFr EXIST FFE v91. 69 982.75 SF 1- 72 179 __ 1_ P.C 6, NKDE. D330+ E00[ HANDICAP ED STALL WTAII W I-I .'III- •?"; U r;. . HANDICAPPEC SIGN DETAIL US E 4E AL N0. .- - 1 CXGx[[D /LA+pyavC Art[?iXC• X[rm IA,AC S.e54f <iFS. 'nC i0l ..w0+:1 uAFn?<r x.n H} 1 (Yrfl >i3-SCe F? 1 f>?7) >335e96 1 2 siC A»aESS 0> KMpIfN`-T. Ro.J 7 ?7fi E( 14027... f15f) ( ? Par(l ro r e wr rsro,o;atw.ror» x [ zaxNC ro' [ ?wlsE.' x, F N ?., / r?n?FeoPOUO us- alrys erLpxo -.XIFIED C. 2 O ryrAt 9'C nR[A 1 .50? ,r Y O rb AC ry pp. fxU - xCUO l.1 PXrvi 5x?'?• Y u.}3. _ _ ._ QA X,eacnS. seMDU= PEYL 51. I'll 11' :irPl •11'R) x 10' (PROP) _.y EEFJ1 ?Coo FEnR lo001'RUVI E ALLCwAy,[ w\[ XE Cx' 1p$0' Pr FPOroszo e.oc x(n, •.' .i *o rtos v4vu.nr c O v SOL10 WASiE S.uu BC . PUIi 0,1 - -'A.- 9 4L .5 pL .PDCO ftA55CO AvE<6 -,wax PcN'_UF_wa• 5x<ll EE SWSEJ . 5 raa<unox ,i 9 MOUnCC / a .. SFALLe v[D 1.]op X X O4CSS FLCCP eP[A (JJ 1?e?.]S X tAtS$ PLOCf NRAr : (, caU XI a e'PaF,9 RFPaPf0 L A nPi[ ma rlF rank i z s, p.xo . +r+ cA. _ : ro a v= n NC .E. [wrTFX. (vaDrF 6S'tTC[-/ . T[e.4Ai[ C0uP4CxExFVE Sp:At[ v•"+ ,< i0'K YRAARfw 'i}OFK X 01, K) r X Nn ac, Sera X WPUv 1 rU,M Ortx SPA[(' ,,NCtp Y ()i[ .O lbtlrl T 9:,} aq C ?O,K pOri LOUR AiYw •b,6' 9 !J r' [Artl %: ?e T MO[ IA].I 0e016R xu 4 eLXw4,i0(C:+9AV[U Aw(A W PMap.L iNa39 for4.. IS rgir i lY+% ` M'V )et? V V Y (D 4K3 N I MIN 1. rX) UTi YM[F.4 t MrFUYIPTK x[xi ? 3 5Pn3S > Pw2S.?.044 4 Xw MC. „99 M Y (r0UL) 33'..t' S (??Y:': is 'E VF a4C NO Cx.Y+6.xCxiA,cr UNOUC .RCAS xMxr * [ 9'f I! ,KM AP[ NO vNpN [AL[xW iS wiwiN i+[ S*F I6 hFF[ nP[ XO wCitnuOE w*xM n.[ Xt[. r> 4l [,'RV'O.P lr0+ligt w[L BE x[NNRO -O 6lUC 1 Mi'[f x(m WWI '1I rrn Anx Farr r -1. to e UCCUPavCr O< '[ B.OJw J x a ? 4 y ;? nogg ? gggg? ?t . =3 E $ a K O © f Z (?j 4 ? a ? V F W O V: Y } S (J 4 FF a 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Hickey, 107 McMullen Booth Rd CDB exhibit.pdf Oops, I forgot to send it to you after I finished on wednesday. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <keith@keithzayac.com> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 5:40 PM Subject: Hickey, 107 McMullen Booth Rd Keith - we are sending out packages to the CDB on Monday. Would like to include a letter from you re Hickey. If possible, submit to me by 10:00 am (can drop it off, fax or email it to me). Thanks. Wayne 1 11 ]Keith Zayac & Associates, I[?c. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning • 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com TO: Michael Delk, AICP DATE: January 3, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Dept. JOB #: 313-04/permits 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: Hickey Office WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ® Attached ? Under Separate Cover via ? Plans ? See Below ? Shop Drawings ? Prints ? Specifications ? Copy of Letter ? Change Order ? Samples COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 $75.00 continuance fee 1 City Letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ? For approval ? Reviewed, no comments ? Resubmit copies for approval ? For your use ? Reviewed, comments as noted ? Submit copies for distribution ® As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return corrected prints ? For review and comment REMARKS: Please call if you have any question. 117 CC: SIGNED: L??2 NAME: Keith Zayac, A-,-R'-.L.A. t Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description FLD2005-07077 04 Payments: Method Payer • Check PATRICK E HICKEY • R_D 1759 In Person Payment Total: 75.00 $75.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page I of I Receipt #: 1200600000000000074 Date: 01/04/2006 Flex Continuation Revenue Account No 010-341262 Line Item Total: 1/4/2006 11:02:10AM Amount Paid 75.00 $75.00 Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid cReceipt.rpt • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:13 AM To: 'Richard Marcel' Cc: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: RE: Hickey Office Building Richard - I sent the following to Keith on December 20th. This was with just the little encroachment of the common driveway onto Tony's property. Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:12 AM To: 'Keith Zayac' Cc: Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Hickey Office Keith - I am sorry to inform you that the agenda has to be delivered to the Clerk at 8:30 am, which is late as it was supposed to be to the Clerk yesterday and leaves me no time to have the material together which must be . submitted to the Clerk, and the Director determined that this case will have to wait to the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting. To be scheduled for that CDB meeting, all application material must be submitted to the Planning Department by noon on Wednesday, January 11, 2006. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Richard Marcel [maiIto: Richard@Keithzayac.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office Building Wayne, Since we moved the CDB for Hickey to next month, what would be the due date for the plans to be submitted? Thank you, Richard Marcel Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Phone: 727-793-9888 Fax: 727-793-9855 1/3/2006 t?VTFk, oil' LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 December 22, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Road) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on December 20, 2005, continued the above referenced request to their February 21, 2006, meeting. The request is for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one- foot (to pavement) and from 20 ,feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for property located at 107 McMullen Booth Road. In accordance with the City's fee schedule, due to two continuances, there is a total $150.00 continuance fee ($75.00 per continuance) due to the City. Please remit a check made out to the City of Clearwater by 4:00 pm on Friday, January 6, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. _Sincerely, Michael ec P Planning Director S.IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD) Wending caseslUp for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - 2.21.06 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 CDB Continuance Letter 12.22.05.doc BRIAN J. ALINGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR How HAMILTON, COUNCIL\IE\1BER BILL JONSON, COUNCII_\IEMBER ? CARLEN A. PE7T:RSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:12 AM To: 'Keith Zayac' Cc: Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Hickey Office Keith - I am sorry to inform you that the agenda has to be delivered to the Clerk at 8:30 am, which is late as it was supposed to be to the Clerk yesterday and leaves me no time to have the material together which must be submitted to the Clerk, and the Director determined that this case will have to wait to the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting. To be scheduled for that CDB meeting, all application material must be submitted to the Planning Department by noon on Wednesday, January 11, 2006. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 4:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office Attached is a copy of the site plan. I told Pat Hickey to have the application to you by tomorrow at 10:00am. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/20/2005 • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 4:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office Attached is a copy of the site plan. I told Pat Hickey to have the application to you by tomorrow at 10:00am. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/20/2005 -?/rn ray W„roee A4 ° NOTES a € ]. Cvwr,°rl, ?WU9 M wro 1rl Mn - Pon nrr rgnecHp STRAIGHT CURB EXISTNO SIDEWALK) EXISTING EDfZ of PAVENQR ?N?µO E TRIANGLES 1 ./(I) 24• slo 4" WHITE • TRAFTIC PANT co EXISTNG EDGE OF PAVENENTZ Z J J D 2 U M.C. STALL & SON CITY INDEX 0110 @ IsOP03f0 A. e vAwe[N1 a• 5.000 PSI CONC • ?p OAYe / 5 BM CMRMIW9 WNPA<1[0 [ARM 6"x18" RIBBON CURB Nis a ?/! ?fil4 ?'?'" sir ?ar WKeO.W { aural fG311A36°? ? [,R1?^ nw1 A.1en.W O ww,in'wiaus ? lisl r ? ? P+ Rw om la LL???JJJ NOIIM GRAPHIC SCALE 0 LEGEND (iH) nNC.AI P PAdY4 R/W PqR-a-1wY PPONT3[D e' e1PA10KT Q#e PPDER BOUIOAP, GENERAL NOTES: i. [NDREEPAAMSCAPE ARCHITECT: MIR ZATAC N! ASSOCIATES. INC. ml ENTERPRISE PD E. SXM It, ----- S "` NAABDR R 34898 `(72 CAMPHOR ( 721) '? 793-9535 Bu F, . L1`t 3, 2. 3(T[ A00RES9: 107 ,DN'ALEN 90OTH ROAD ( I ttGRWATEP, R 33159 I- PIJrCR P. 10/29/10/0W00/210/OS00 ONING; .0. [ 1,RA [SENTm EISDENTIAL ?'<. PROPOSED USE: OFFICE BNLONG 5 TOTAL STE AREA 11.50219 N ((IN AC) --_ I 0. [BST. BLDG, FOOTPWRNT 1.05'.90 r (all FAR) ' TRUg3 1. SETBACKS SEC411BLL EB?SOS E `)" GI 2xW FWWr ealr MST To aLOa) 18.17 (WEST TO ROC.) 20.00• SOME 10.70' (NORTH TO BLDG) I 1,04' (NORTH TO S.QQ) 1.10 (SoUTN 10 SLOG) 1.32' (SOU1H TO 9DEWALK) 'Al RCWI(tE6 I 20.00 WEAR 03.90' (EAST TO BLOa) R6['1SACK -1 5. ALLOWABLE MA% HDON' ECK 3(>-3 FT I PROPOSED 8= HDOM 11, FT TO A00/ NDPONT 9. SOTTO WASTE SHALL B[ A AOL OUT 11- CONTANEP ! 10. 5111URIED GRASSED AREAS MTNN P1ONI-OF-MAY SMALL BE SODDED. 11. PARKING TABULATION 9AOTPEOLMV,. A? 9 SPA PER 1.000 SF OF GROSS ROOK AREA • (3)(1, W?Sf? FLOOR AREA) / 0.000 sr) .WE FENCE OAK S SPACES PROVOEO: 3 STANDAND a 1 HAwCAP . 4 TOTAL 11 A SEPARATE CQWWENE49K SOIMOE PACKAGE WILL BE 9UMATTED. 11 Sl9 DATA TAIILE [1sIR 5918$15 ELQ@ A IOTA m AREA 1LY2.111(DN m 1L3O.N IF (931 AD 1-:. 5.'MAL um SPAO: 4 3r (9Y M 1TRa IF (0N M -11 G M1AP0 AsX LA3119 s It. IN0 l-. IF (A131M MN IF Mq (9n rM D ss[WAXA[aNAVm AP[A .ANm r .1.. H/A L IOIAL WR[eWDUS Arta 1MIe 3r (e] eWt {33331 ! (911 O5 aaWe1 f vAt (0N IWW f PAPI9tl0 1Att4 0 fAQe ! sAm ! ACOO0NIa9 3Alee9 4 s M/A G 1INTE"O1 `NM PE ARE 1 m IT N WRRIOII IAIOSLWPt MEk 590 f < P,9pp S 0101 RGW1W 14: THERE ARE NO ENVRON[NIALLY UMW[ AREAS MIHN THE SITE. 15. THEME ARE NO KNOWN EASEMENTS MANN TIE SITE 10. TIERS ARE NO 1KRA104 - THE SR. 11, ALL ExTERIOP LINNTNNO WWL SE NOINno TO BLDG. 1L A FIRE INSPECTION MUST BE CILLFD FOR AND PASSED MOC TO OCWPANCY OF THE BLDG to OACK BAR I. CONTANERS WILL % PLAoF11 NEXT TO ME P.AMWENT ON NC IANLEN BOOTH ROAD FOP PICK UP IN, M CITY OF CLEARWATER SON WASTE UPI. 6 { V -. r YJ d Y li ? PL a Y )? e3 C Rai d ? U O 0 O -? Z W C1. a U .] 0. 0 E- O 6 F W a ? X 6 U_ G] S . V HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL l r aw W w a PROPO9tD WAR ? t ,_,/2'R WdWR SVrtan ° PA1r 1EFFr Z a? GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND NOTES, / F ImA . IP G = 1'YA R`".eW«oH«« `W9 s.D°o PSI cnrc. ^ R/W wa,-W-WNV -i .... . , e 28 DAH a PRW040 B. TTFADfT OpB / / . / WEIR(W)°28.93' ! ° BAR CDNnNIAUS?IL - 111- ????.. I,,,,?y/-I CUNC • BpUApAAY T?_AlCWTt•EbM Aim; ti D PHARV ?a ,?09 ry?6" o ° `o t2 W ^P z-SIDRY °. 618° RIBBON RIB WnoD FRAME e^ }?°?° ")' ttF e m .O ISTINO SIDEN'ACN 60 II v p15 .M ,Uq ,1 p F.F. EL=30.66' }° CONC 8 C ry9R` } ys N,B 0 1 ISTRIC Of PAYEMENI a 7° `} GN1(NG'111 °? y°?' V }a}y0 1 > N ggI u e .g oy2 ?°°' z 3 Y y0 }p' } Wo00 20.00' g1 STAIRS ,o BAfx °.° I \ (2) 20'•2( Y SIGNl VISIBILITY e yry 1 r` oP of a 'p? A` TRIANGLES MR.) cone }p?, to. }o ?ryry 3' a GENERAL NOTES: ?3 ? ?OD N I h I (1) 21' STOP BAR TURF BLOCK W/ 6'xtdj° ' WOOD v "ED O 1. ENOMEER/LANDSCAPE ARM— KD,H ZAYAC 8 ENTERPRISE W E. ASSOCIATES, INC. RIBBON CURB BANDING FENCE ? WET HARDER R 95 SIATE A01 P1 - DRIVEWAY (1) EMPLOYEC PARKING ;V 95 E -9889 B l 9S II 'n 2° SIGN x S89'27'56"E 230.00'(D )1 TV 790-9a'A Fa• T ax a T-.. . .a P AD .s 32.22 ... / j SS 01 MWULLEN BODIH RO 22' (M) LLB, x0: C [AR AffA, FL ams9 } 5D CO' (D) It p? 9m: /e/29/Ie/DOOOO/zlo/osoo ?B$q 4' 9A11TE? P ?SPH?AifIC ANT I •O p7h 4" CONC. BARREL S/ORA(1E`,'¢!_ 1US ORCSENT USE RESIDENTIAL o. E DRIVE el il, - m W/ d' OPAOUE WOOBi?NO?E. -C}T'f• l Q I w EXISTING CE OF PAVEMENT _ ?WQ?CAT Q R (3)Q q Q ? PROPOSED USE: OFFICE BUH.ONO m _ _ _`\^ j TOTAL SITE AREA 11,502.19 SF (D28 AC) __A/C PAD ___________ ._____.-_____- .--?? t EWST, BID. FOOTPRINT 1..5,SO SF (0.11 FAR) J ot0 }19 °to > I¢ / ` (TYV,) ./??/ %/; ^ G(iR g\ mSETACKS 25.ff FRONT Mil (WEST TO BLDG) J x } }p. -j. - 84' I 1 it 1 y?oO`?,+ 1&IT {WEST TO &D.C.) 10, (HoolN TO S= ry+} -0 A' TALL EXISTING BLDG ° ?kai-I i 'r?d°a'?FItAIN? }p?T I 3 1 !{ T0.00' SIDE 160' (NOR H 10 8Q ) ALUM NUM ° % i5? ,p1 n EXIST FFE-31.80 °6 y0 \ 1 9?/ '/J T.10' (SOUTH TO BLDG.) MANDNAIL h° / 'La 1,688.00 $F 0p M1 O, } O \ I TM, (SOUTH TO got..) 20.00' REAR 8].98' (EAST TO SUM) C 1 ?,a?+d2y }C''DOh A } oQR ??RETDL=V, TOR. LEI ___________ ?"p & AL10'NABLF MA% N[IOIT 30.50 FT IM-30.36 U.D ' R - Z' 1AOP05ED BLD0. HEIGHT IV FT TO ROOF itopmT Nv.;n)+ze ^u'o o? }' 8. _ ho o'h •t7^20^.2 12vV.{W)=26'26' a` 9. SOLID WASTE 9H >°'AlL BE A ROLL OUT MASH CONTAINER .y. EE DEI?* A{ }p? 5 S' 0 h 0 +Y I4' CONC. ADE ALI( 80.81'5 8198, ?ip ?( 10\b5 \MRBED GRASSED WAS MTIW AKAIT-6-WAV gFALL BE SOWED. 1h 1 A 6 L4 30,5 ,tO?V b , L 00. R It, PARNWO TABULATION }'L' } 0t(D) ?,2s? REPERi 1,0 noa+ ` } } y0 9 x ry STRNCHT CVRB 29PA PER .OW SF OF OPOS4 AREA ne' s' ?MS ctatc ume p N89'4898 'W .72' (M) P 8 -I. SNEWA n1 LET k N101 1 + ! [D FLOOD AREA) / (1,OOD SF) 3 P' CITY INOE W?1 FCM4%4•' >< $PER 7" OB%T8 LS 2512 8' 1MCN CONCRETE ti '11 pp 0°' °6 04i 8' WOODEN OPAL FENCE i6^ OP ACES OWISED: m o PAVEMENT yp. yp. +j' ^f0'po1 +; ''? }°'? 5 STAND ? T HANDICAP . A TOTAL N.C. N. C. STAR R 4GN PER L01 1 0 12. A SEPARATE NWPEHEN412 SMAOE PACKAGE WLLL BE SUBWTTED. CITY INDEx M,td @ 119 I `> w( Frank A. D'Amico. Jr. }°' Lot 2 'Lot 3 +a SITR DATA TAat EB.= EAR Rau= _.A TorA SITE AREA: 11,SpT,N I al. b I- 4 A. A,) L. I MF B. TOTAL WEN PAR: _ 4 (a1R AR >,1TEM 9 faro AD - W Mx f f c R AOIND AREA 1A33W 91¢11 IA14 1,9%W s (.111.) AMO f MW {Otl F O D SmCWAIx/DEIX/PA1E9 AREk I-P W 1WS1A W ?. L tOTAI RAIFRYRx15 AREA: YDAO 9 IaT e% IAt3Te S IDM IV) aBNAI f MAx {013 9A) w ??Wn'w'[vwfm F PARxWO PARS ? ? 3 SoAm 3 - N... a WINDRAR PAW-' AREA: 1 a031W 4 N/A eM e<•CAnM '•'a' H. WT[RDI LANDSCAPE AREA 000 W DW 4 <I= I w RIDAFIO) { Iti THERE ARE N0 ENNWONIAENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS WTHW THE SR. - X41 °'I°q1° 11 THERE ARE NO KNOWN EASEMENTS WITHIN THE SITE 9 wrz )IAU 1& THERE ARE ND -ANDS -N THE SIR. E eaAweuw :T. ALL 1111 R MGHTINO WILL SE MOUNTED 10 BLDG S. A FIRE RASPCTION MUST BE CALLED FOR AND PASSED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE BLDG. • ww Pm 19. BLACK BARREL CONTAINERS WLL Be PLACED MAY TO THE PAVEMENT ON MC MULLEN •al. •\ BOOM ROAD FOR PICK UP BY THE CITY W CLEARWATER SRAD WASTE DEPT. HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL ] i i'•C U SIG, 9 C4 GO O e¢E U ? .7 G. CGD F. O F •?) 9Ys 3 OF 5 4 li r GFtI SIC HCF 1 awe a1 n r i 9a!a9 • RrpaCWbIP RINalra aLTAt PLANT LIST p : I.Prrv®4aNy CwY? <fdLM. N.ahrRJlltl fa .wmwwP^rwn PYJrrs Vb„v4Jap,RM,)as4C, UNKNDo m8 \ 1 1 I r______________________. I I 1 I REDDIPED 15El"I.Fe '-- 47-7? ro e BARRICADE DETAIL nr,x GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES ?rYCr Q'?r° m ?.Y? ?wm? arn.MV a.. ,a vv+.a ae.. b ?..w.e, w vwar ww. uv?v. v,e vvrwf. mbw. ? sue. 'r T. «o.?Mrrere w.. e,a aaCl mawb.? a e.a <, M+wr o.a. rra. r ea[... «uwr a w rbMq Q ?'d '"-x`.?;'• x p avpq we b eaa a<vawrb .nn v. na,rb rr«..ww.:f vw aY.•. pYwab. aParn,M fa<erb.. •5 L y " 4FF3? < p?p? ;M b IwMM Mn Igfain'8F r6f IJtl. m .e w erewrM««f .barMbu to <nrPerap, yr?n ? .? I.A TREE PLANTING DETAIL ncx '? rfw ava* '?'? b w< aovwraralfd^"f wr sn wwd< wrd,rb b^ffev °< wpOUr lagrw?tdA.«.°M1ilv?.a?'?vw"`?w.l.?°a-roa ?.m.?nvxa«eMba .i°.°e lnaaa ?? ? ;I,J '+ Y z i- ;i rose, arwe..ae4 .1a. p pYMrq wwa..bn r.arr. a r wrw d reasdb arbae ba mw<n wan ra b b wab e,wd,r„r. d ?h + - +- s rwr br re P<f enm ', w w.w d ee.<a".n ,h e?ar? w`,eb"'"m " m.bnlY f« we am.www a w Iwrfbw awa.M«. w . arv.b+n . Pbrn ,y, nn pro- .bn a.Mt a4 \ { \ \ { 6 lNnlf One novel fan <oAan„r. bd braaro avfaPbdbe aq mavb ?s1 rrnawa beMNamn f.1 a rwwa«a er,1 earraeee d IM wAM«'e ememw. \ \ f \ { + + +/ + \ f. rm b[dba erw evNea b rbvge Y b,waa•v M b bmwn0 aY w fwT ova 1e pmmq. / \ ? \ / ? / -. _ +- +- wy W MvrrM. Wvsv^tln lrwrN eem ab mre IN f6 rM lv??w«Mnreela.M m ewt?iwnirrt u ,? w' . p w a ??? n "°'°°" ; ?° w q m Ine f l q abe arrro:wy. rava ar,aefm fw ,aWe b rgwa „d!• caMllwr, w !m emn Y W earl d fa lbl?oa ,bdrveb• a w Nn,e d bbawy ? N ,f. M lar9pw d ^?Y wamW vw«M1 wtl boon Is Mrfaxn C? w d ral M M vb+ fp ? ,pap fT. M ?T ?raar a Na a rvMIM vrMw onvMUbb. d MnM im. a. yrgevae Isdie<r a'a wNp d w,eaw eevgb, PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) f f 14 lnerv f W a ro Wabn, arelb, « +bdldbm wvbd W wpb mw.a d W e«wr. 'x v `?0i`0'aq. a u: „rw..<nar ybr.?aM . wm.a awn nn«now ..r o o.n.a a ,.dr. Ifm .wlr. ,ram ,wr u. Y ww.,darw b a nra-<a<re a W e.am. ?.nrMw wr Ia rrr... mn.rw •.a.ror. a..ew.+w ara 9 6 q Q 0 p; :I , EXISTING BLDG iXm- I s. > PT 1 i 1 EXIST 0 SF .60 1,5888,0.00 SF LANDSCAPE ??? --- BLIiiER ------- ----- ------------ ------ s? ?? n 0 ,S 'l- o 0 y It- o M r,p1J nmmYdey b W ee•n. ,) bnbvep A w bar b M wa,we b rve<vna[bs, f N, M relxhG baw Cab' fMa1M Wrepn ?dl, aaM elbow, <arae N by tarebwf Capaaw A M a0libra aoM. fx p v«rNa b<ee, wr ro a nmre<e b W e,ftlwb cwa•¢1w wave, dar.b, eb<vkdr adee b Ia efeAl<a1bM1 [.D A f0. fb <mnrMw b„M1RVdbn amw vM b fwmwb m W vglM, vma M 1a wwlM rMmdbn ,Iww. p a 0 z ra Moab ? arm a nmww ae <f<faer a aeb.aeaa ar bPwaga W .• ??+*o .?.., fa1 .. m,<?.be m,q fa e,ew.r. nrfnaw ova a ....rb.e f. wa V ? _ _ • a TT. lwNe<aw ,]Mnvl« vF a •vw«raW N w Mleelbn rwwws wJ wm.r e.e.r d wv w+e M arbrb E- a ?. P?06 ?dva auraq My aeelddb• d Iw. vml,LL 0 ° G u 2)(3^ CPM\I :x p wb aa,nw .nnu, aop d war as a base. w z ? M U S C<] ? % IRRIGATION NOTES L j ? .w .PY. mgf,w, qvw• faf wwb.. feaa <ar«q. b a vbe.b av.+ry.. r. ?, e.a e w s,dar.a a ,a c ar r I w.a P nel L rf me a e a e ? ? yy r <n Y . . n . < . b m D 2 UP maarb Ae.m mw mM > ..<..e a °«,Yam?min'P._ aaa rlnw P.w.Ka.. MemaN Pao, °?w"i'ari`b:b: a"?e..d ? g T .. [ i b?,er wm arbbo+ mm a .wrrw.a wra a.wa.a 4 w allr ab. a [M afmwa vow . ? - a ,r ^M° °'b" m'd ? i °,' ° f " n? w 'P' i? 4 ,rw mer. n.a<n. x mb +amr b rwe ..<n.r ., < .1 <ae e msc e wwb. fan cw«av. arb a rde..dr .wbr wre w.., G? egabn b-baa wa.srae, .row as,.aa. a.a as.ry eb+b m nwdxab„ S. •/a eaeaedfa,.. wbr a .xmmY aar a and bw.nb ova aeb.l.r<n 1 1 ?. w oa.....a. f. w n e °o ? i a ? a ? e rwa . <w a ww n iar N i : 1. w faarwfb inlyvlbn MNT <ambbav WI by dnbva. br v<ar meMVamere' • pMrblbn R ,? branm??vent? Cbavmp w,bw-CarrgvrrMwb [mvW urv - xa? onero. Lama nxv« - n vw.e amu<- ro'fm?w'rab p.. 1 1 5 OF 5 -L" . Z j''1 GRA?NIC BCAIE Z exRe t IADRQap.IR RAMA.O OEYN. PLANT LIST Y m UMfbrtbwevt. Ett2 N'GL11a MJ wtrrWaw..FJa, Cww M/N, ftO M.NAThIRJ1att tN w eropvrnw ewerdsNewnlw,AON.RNI,)te•4c. I Iti RARMCAU DETAIL 4 TREE PLANTING DETAIL N*.A ?, _?nw..aNa,,.wa 4r ' )6 V ?? Lot 3 Jerzy & NYc;o KGCZO?.'/ TREp iOREIIENOJEen]1'TOR1L 5 OF 5 nwN GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES `b"'°m° °"' am. om.wa erw... r.m.a m >wo..or.. orw?. wo nmrrm. wM.rr i n0iw o a 3 ur. a ow t N d I 0 3 mammn . M Ir? ..1? mmwM.?? Wt FbM. w -n= it. wa"6d?,r w we a",.«re: mM°. w.?.r obr.;. } y > a ?? s N darnb .bt a Barr. w aoe....e. n rbntt xn wrn.;. e.e an..:. ,..omb.. mem.w mm+Rtw T ? ?3 V ? wa r nnnuee ?r.m to-to-Jadt w w rN .w.n.ywamn. wapnaq w. E_ e3l" t A tl.rtltwpp .?i..Aq. a IN .RVmwvb vw.AMn w td..a 9w wN erd e0Y ?c rrW.M cM tMN...a. lmnwre wMM. Ma oral/ w1 1to c4 N dM vMM a awe Oabb arE fMrv4.r?'9^h a Z ' : :i. J I `? l rvWm •rR?n aJ.wttr wvlbry mdn.w wa tmw-ed.b ato.Mr. 1 tlwR .b d .m a M Mrawwt .MN. w . Mwn..eeet. me. ? ? D ? e. N p.mrq pwt. vaR ne.t. o J' ratn a r.tMN Isr....e b rrNaa..tttr M1 a a .cle.e-w aln Mbblbe ). trn .?nr ? nu sn.m.. n vwwb0 tv M cawmNn a la lard.a.a. CNwfv. w Iti wM a e d.mpwer e.t , Rw am w don t.w M vw sm wta. A NW YM mM An. cvM1abn. nm .wMO callNbw. h4 m.1.M M mM,ry twdhmbrr rN.. b rwrrm.d and rwbaN m IM mMwbi...www e. a...w t wmt.. w. w.l«f m .bw• N btab.. ne. a wn.... a Iti wr . Rq a n t6 M?te? .wMrMS .M „rrwwy?q. rye. ? rp wM tM /1. vV M. Nt lawwrM1V Qcr.o.Mn nx v w ?? w ? ?y 5 ?«mp m IN u r. / MPVr9 mwwry, rrox w mMRw, v !o- Mm w IM .aN a IN leretc.w Grrb¢ia m lln pw a W}ry b M.e f. r.Rae 3? ! 6? tt. t? t? .eM IaM rndlvrb Mw ?f TO MM.OS N ^m+M .CMn.r. OnvM N bw.w b wnmm y f d 1` tt. PbrR maMd .eaR b d0 w .R.em.J anY.. urr..oA.eb. d WrIM tlm. Hr. uaa.mw MtlR4 w q w rMwq a wwea c..ry.a 1A ? ( 11 A]-a?eees mwnrM. Ib Nwr M aq/v seakabm .M M 6.dro b w. lmdaaw .hldM te . . a le f u d wtb• e bta edamb n a . .m . re , n , rw . « e. waw. .. . w . w mn.ra tv Ye twe.t?t nm owamw w .mrq. olwl v+.egwr v e wroe a twlw (tat ?rs.w rror• mra ? M w a n . a to III m..r?. I?eabM a weM ?a tl,. t„aw.w cwrww nrt. le b?.w ma.nd w.lwmr. owAwnew tla tt a r<IeNe a w`ce: rrw.? .,moo : ?`wnnr"r"tm°re+e w ear Lwmrat w..?ern`r,d: ?`. w .m'r,".?.w. le. N o.mee. w..wr a. b e. ma+ete a m w.tde•3 .e.e.dw wrlt>, m..r.a.. emwlar aa.e w u. twalmroe V A N. Me cvrM1taaw aYMYIMI.n na+t MI M owrrMM w 1.. nolwt ..wet Iv M n.Ntl eaeriruew .yv. 0 z 6 m. EMllep wa /Idl M nnrew0 w wwavy b e cmoGa. rw Wm11rp w ?a• .. aJJ attM IM v ebe.. wap fw d4..... r..l.edb. K b •..ade.e b U ? tt. Yb lerdrtew M1wd« M b r.tantep Iv Ito edbcUen. r«rva. M n¢w mwa.el d A vd M dRM1 ? 0 [y ? T^ndM sa'l'e IN br.ladbn d R.e a.lyd. a N m. N v.at dt1YNb Mew rlpM a wy .M1a b .eda.0. ?' i9 U IRRIGATION NOTES S U nnpuw otl.a em: .w.•w• b w>awr d.tW.. - tR M e. yri.tl mq Mheq q 11? Mlraiw l..v.l ra eW MAtbn tt 1..1. YtmtC a' rnJ ?w WaM1?hn? wt"?°I.em? w'le.me Ra• ceY we. G G s twdbr dm sa..at m,et e. nerrtw aae wmw.e a a. ur vla t. a. ew..wwm ww.. ? wi?' 's1O "«O9 . a ? e a ""?: g '? ? t.td er. lela rr.ltl rlwue n . taa. w .m? i°mu e anvb taw mrwww. aro Mltdt a re.r .wv and amw. s i i1"`" a ? «I m ?° ' w oa n ' /awta m , wrd e. . w.mw wi o m sloe ?arrv t . G .rr..e.w .teelY /v an t ? .u tln 4rnM Ctmradv. RrrGdint ). 1N bbawe wr3mM1^ .rd.rrr cane.wMt .N b aw.s .n eeM ntmraadn.n' e.ewnlbas IR IrMbr lM a ? Mamm a Slmrw M? Cwrhd tarrtr - afalM f' [KKiR Ve.. Mmw -- t0' Rw4 YOn M. I' • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:55 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07077 -107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application, scheduled for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting. We have received your request to continue the application to the January 17, 2006, CDB meeting and are transmitting that correspondence to the CDB members. On the CDB Consent Agenda I have placed the above referenced application in the "Request for Continuance" area of the agenda. Call me tomorrow regarding submitting the revised application material for both Hickey and Tony's properties. Wayne 4cMullen Booth 107 Staff Repor... F) 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Richard Marcel Subject: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Wayne; We would like to request a continuance for Hickey Office Building from the December's CDB meeting to January's CDB. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/15/2005 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Wayne, I wanted to touch base again to see if you have reviewed the concept plan we emailed over and the processing of this project. Specifically: 1. Will staff support the revised layout 2. Will the application need to be revised as a joint application. 3. Since I have been waiting for a response we obviously have missed the submittal date to be put back on the December CDB agenda under the old application. What schedule can we get back on track with. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/16/2005 9 . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 5:18 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office I have brokered an agreement between Pat and Tony to share a driveway. I have the following questions: 1. Do I need them both to sign a revised application. 2. Do I need to submit a full survey of Tony's parcel. 3. When do I need to resubmit for the December CDB. I am planning on sending over a PDF of the new site plan for your review. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/6/2005 • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 4:51 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Fw: Hickey Here is the revised site plan. Please give me your thoughts and required process. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Marcel To: 'Keith Zayac' Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 4:34 PM Subject: Hickey Thank you, Richard Marcel Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Phone: 727-793-9888 Fax: 727-793-9855 12/6/2005 a. Orw a v5R PRCPOSFD dAOE 1 I/2'P wM0 suH4w 6. /-PAHIIEXT LEGEND y y _ cRArwc scA(.a ¢ B NOTES 4 ) (TW) TwNCAL GL" a•" T.. wI M"1/TbMw H't M"M 0 (vssa )" ApU3 b ' ttl-.' L ? mM ?N Fµ M JOm W. MM R" s me4 - w M1 R/W PodT-OG-wAr .Su09v?•.. 3,000 PSI GONG w?DAr= 'I 9 PRDPO=m4.9?NdTaRB PROJECT BOUNDARY ySTRAIGf?T COO I s BAR CONTINUOUS 4aM AC1Ep F,wTK I I r' Fool -ENT -ON ??A? .:8"x18" RIBBON CURB D ?yP,KISTNG SIDEWA&-\ ,1DYH' MS • I- - '>..' ...? ¦ M1EPod LMDSCME AREA CXISTNG CD4 OF PAVEMENT \ {G j' .f I I GENERAL NOTES: x -....... _.-......._.. _.. _. - ._......_.. J, 9. 1 E . XCNEER/L.ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC k ASSOCIATES, INC. /(1) 24 STOP BAR t. > N39 BLOCK W6 a19, 6 V I \ 701 ENTERPRISE L SUITE 404 Pry !;'\\ ?% .,i., RIBBON CURB IBA OHNC N L yl\ SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 (1) EMPLOYEE PARKING () 9888 B"R I SIGN f PHGR (727) 793 9855 F0a - I } fG7 T{ AAORESS: 107 MI BOOTH ROAD ?1 / Y 4? t?Y£ ..? '22 ?J?•?1 CLEARWATER. FL 33759 P EID: 16/39/16/00000/210/0500 4' WHITE ,I. + _•.. • . /r ?\ ... n 1 ?? I fff e? TRAFFIC PAINT LAW ZpNING: 'O' 4' C. C. BARREL STORAGES ?((US ?REKNT USE RESIDENTIAL O St 3? W/ 4 OPAOUE__N'OOD-iENNE'o -?{Nt J11 EXISTING EJG- OF PAVEMENT ,.•h \\ El DIED USE: OFFICE BUILDING T -._. -l ? 1 ! (fit m 1 .- 4 YTOTAL SITE AREA 11,502.19 SF (0.26 AC) - -E%IST. BLDG. FOOTPRINT 1,665.90 SF (0.14 FAR) A/C PAD W IAUg\ SETBACKS: BE9W6EII 2@4205EQ J (TTr) - / 1" G \ 25. NT 60.11 NEST TO BLDG J / -- By' 1 1 1 8.17 (WEST TO B O.C.) 20.00' SIDE 10.70' ORTH TO BLDG.) EXISTING BLDG RH TANK 20.00' SIDE 10.70' MORTH TO BLDG.) 7 i uJ 1.04• (NORTH TO BO. C.) Ur T1 1 y? s 1 EXIST FFE-31 60 \ I ? Y 1+J zm `SOUTH TO To BLDG) c : U' Iv ` L ,.._. 1'588.00 $F 20' REOUIRE6 2000 REAR 83 (EAST EST TO BLDG.) ) WAd G - •^ ! i L >? _ •y I c khd I REAR BE'IF3ACK Y - r+ - - 4 ------ - -- - - B. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 30-50' FT (4 / / PROPOSED BOG. HEGHT It' FT TO ROOF MIDPOINT ?- t 9. SOLID WASTE SHALL BE A ROLL OUT TRASH CONTAINER .81 A' CONC SLIDEWALK •,? I 60 29,5 83.96 10`0015VRSED GRABSEO AREAS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. }0 5 0j 7 11PARKING TABULATION SPACESREOUIRED: - ''"'^"- -"v r _?{{{"w .ice-^^"• :..:. _? _ ?..-A^ 25PA PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA 6' STRAIGHT CURB PER A4894838 W 17872 r RIF GROSS FLOOR AREA) / (1,000 SF) s 6oN( F u' (M) V9 -t r CITY INDEX y101? I: I( f5 SP 8 ftEOUIRED W/. SI DEWALR NC NLET-'p 8' WOOOE OPA?IE FENCE • QA PER FOOT INDEX /]16 6' THICK CONCRETE N ?, 16 'SPACES PROVIDED: S 1 PAVEMENT 3 STANOARR + 1 HANDICAP 4 TOTAL ?? .t. H C. STALL A, SIGN PER 12. A SEPARATE COMPREHENSVE SIGNAGE PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED. T ICITY INDEX y118 &1119,y .' ...> r. I_„{ 13. SIX DATA TABLE EBSDBW` C'81 ED: BEWIBED: _...., . :. ... i. „.... _ -A TOTAL SITE AREA: 1130215 B, M. AC) T.- s (4.v Ac) Amo S w1. B. TOTAL OPEN S'AM' S (all AC) S (ale AC) 0.90214 s vN. f f L BUIIVNG AREA I, ff (0.14 i R) 7-41 W (0.14 FAR) S Y (aw FM) S ro _ 0. SIDIAVED AREA I 'Sn37e 147e x E TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA 4"- s (aT ?) S (O.x Im) 4594RHsA xAX (a75lm) F. PM KING SPACES 4 SPAV3 u i/w 11e p'm - G YEHIOJLW PAWWMT AREA 1XIMI 3 LOY.AO SA¢s s A H/AFWWFD Arm H. INTERIOR LANOWOE AREA: am s am s <- s I-.-) eq 14. THERE ME NO ENVIRONMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS WITHIN TIE SITE. s+ ww wc?w 15. THERE ME NO KNOWN EASEMENTS WITHIN THE SITE. W w1v ?? ri ilnii 16. THERE ME NO NETLANDS WTHIN THE SITE. 17. ALL EXTERIOR LIdTNG 1WU BE MOUNTED TO BLDG. ¢ 1 5m r M 18. AFIRE INSPECTION MUST BE CALLED FOR AND PASSED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE BLDG. 19. BLACK BMREL CONTAINERS WILL BE PLACED NEXT TO ME PAVEMENT ON MC MULLEN 51? BOOTH ROAD FOR PICK UP BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SOLID WASTE DEPT. I14 M","IrwmN"v"TLr M Aw= ,Y HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL ?q 4 "y'Mwiw1°' ilex ! InViLSun41H U Q O U ? x Q N? ? V CS A 03 Q a z W W d ti .7 a o a¢ W _ U HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL 1.1 I XPERMIITT1rn?N9TRLKOUTY 3 OF 5 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 4:07 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road I have forwarded your email to my client and asked him for his intentions. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <keith@keithzayac.com> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 8:33 PM Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - This case was.continued from the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting to the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting. What is the status of this case with your client? As I will need to be revise the Staff Report for the December 20, 2005, agenda, I need to know soon (within the next two weeks). Wayne 1 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 8:33 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - This case was continued from the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting to the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting. What is the status of this case with your client? As I will need to be revise the Staff Report for the December 20, 2005, agenda, I need to know soon (within the next two weeks). Wayne F? 0 • It T -r 'J f_-? U T U A ? W A -V 1C D o, v x' 1-4 t: ? a n t t: 1? PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 19, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Road) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on October 18, 2005, continued the above referenced request to their December 20, 2005, meeting. The CDB stated there will be no additional continuances granted. The request is for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one- foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for property located at 107 McMullen Booth Road. In accordance with the City's fee schedule, there is a $75.00 continuance fee due to the City. Please remit a check made out to the City of Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. Sincerely, Michael De k, A CP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - 12.20.05 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 CDB Continuance Letter 10.19.05.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR B[LL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL mF:iuFR HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBFR CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIL MEMBER "EQUAL IEP.IPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATiw ACTION EMPLOYER" FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: " . 77 9 3 - 9 9 57 Phone: 7? 9 6 2 8 FROM: ) Phone: S l0 2 - ?-J 0? DATE:_ 10 I [ b t'? S RE: 1D MESSAGE: ')) 6.' V 14 «,: c u NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z.- Oct. 16 2005 07:06PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Oct.16 06:50PM 01'17 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY DING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-600-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:19 AM To: 'Keith Zayac' Cc: Thompson, Neil; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005-07077 107 McMullenBooth Road Sorry Keith - I'm actually leaving the office for the day in a few minutes. Perhaps Neil Thompson could assist you. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:16 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FLD2005-07077 107 McMullenBooth Road Gina, I received the recommendation for denial on this project from Wayne and discussed it with him a bit. I would like to take a few minutes of your time tomorrow if possible to discuss options as to what could be done to the site. It is such a small piece of property but I have a couple of ideas. Are you available at 1:00pm for about a half hour? Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 10/14/2005 E • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:01 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: Staff Report for FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case, to be heard by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005, at 1:00 pm. Wayne L'! I McMullen Booth 107 Staff Repor... ?Cp F 0Fiy? r CITY OF C LEARWATE R ap^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ??r®yX1 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 30, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07077) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Case No. FLD2005-07077 for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for property located at 107 McMullen Booth Road, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, ,r,- M , ?? Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III S. (Planning DepnrtmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPe)iding cases)Up for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - 10. 18-05 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 CDB Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER AT% BII-LJONSON, COMMISSIONEK "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATiw ACTION EMPLOYER" • • 313-04 Permits Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning September 8, 2005 Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07077 -107 McMullen Booth Dear Mr. Wells: 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith (a-keithzayac. com ORIGINAL CEP 0 8 2005 CITY N, (,I Enclosed please find 7 sets of information addressing comments received from Pinellas County staff including the following items: General Engineering: 1. 1) Note: A sanitary sewer main extension project may create an opportunity for property owner to connect to City of Clearwater sanitary sewer system. Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773 for details. At this time the applicant requests to keep the existing septic tank in service. A sanitary sewer extension will be a future improvement 2) Delete Sheet #2, will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. The note sheet has been deleted All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note: CRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1. No IssWs Fire: 1. "`PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISTICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. 2. Show on plan that driveway entrance is 24' wide . PRIOR TO CDB The driveway has been revised and labeled as 24 feet wide. 0 0 313-04 Permits 3. Move location of fire hydrant closer to driveway with steamer facing street and show on plan. The hydrant has been moved closer and rotated. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1. No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. ORIGINAL L? SEP 0 8 2005 j PLAN N r,-3 0, 1; L'. C:lTY (fit (:1 ? :=.::r t, :'?»cz Land Resources: 1. Show that the two citrus trees have already been removed prior to building permit. It appears that the citrus trees still remain on-site but this will be coordinated prior to building permit 2. Revise the tree removal calculations to reflect that 37 inches are required to be replaced and modify the landscape plan showing additional tree prior to building permit. The tree removal calculations have been revised. Landscaping: 1. As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, provide the justification for the proposed reductions and include a list of those landscape requirements being requested to be modified or waived (currently the application appears to include a reduction to the landscape buffer along the street frontage from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side of the property from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 12 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet). A comprehensive landscape program application has been included in the package. 2. Sheets 4-616 - Plans do not comply with Section 3-1202.D.2, which states "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width. " Provide the fiat area of a minimum of five feet in width. The stormwater pond has been removed from the 5 foot wide buffer area. 3. Sheet 6?6 - Landscape plan does not provide the required plantings and trees within the required buffers of Section 3-1202.D.1. Additional trees and shrubs have been added around the rear and side property lines. 2 • • 313-04 Permits Parks and Recreation: 1. No issues - less than one acne. Stormwater: 1. Before Building Permit ORIGINAL, It! SEP 0 8 2005 PLAIN; 1) Please provide copy of County drainage connection permit and verify that 12" PVC is acceptable. 2) Dry retention ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less. Solid Waste: 1. No more than 2 black barrels. Acknowledged Traffic Engineering: 1. Driveway width must meet Fire Department's approval. Driveway has been widened to 24 feet as requested. 2. Parking space adjacent to building does not have the 24' wide drive aisle for backing out. This space has been reviewed and approved by engineering. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 3. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. The plan has been revised to provide an accessible path, and the previously designed steps removed. 4. What happens to the adjacent property owner's driveway to the north? The driveway remains in the current condition. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: 1. Indicate the conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions 2 imposed by the Community Development Board) in the narrative and the reasons for the proposed changes proposed. The conditions have been added to the attachments along with the reasons for the proposed changes. Show the location of any proposed freestanding sign, including the proposed height. There is no proposed freestanding sign proposed at this time. 3 • OR I ON A L 313-04 Permits 3. Sheet 5/6 - Darken the existing water main to the building (too light) The existing water main has been darkened. 4. According to Solid Waste, the black barrel is placed next to the pavement of McMullen Booth. As such, remove the staging area from the plans. The staging area has been removed. 5. Sheet A1.0 shows a new 3'x4' window on the west side of the south elevation. However, the south elevation on Sheet A1.1 shows a door. Revise the south elevation on Sheet A1.1. South elevation has been revised. 6. Unclear as to the purpose of the aerial showing an easement over the property to the north as part of the Drainage Report, since that property is not part of the application. Advise. The easement was left over from a previous joint development proposed and does not exist or apply to this project 7. The proposal is to convert an existing single family dwelling for a doctor's office. There was a prior approval by the CDB to redevelop the site, tearing down a portion of the building in order to construct parking, stormwater and landscaping improvements, providing the minimum required parking (FLD2004-04028, approved by the CDB on July 20, 2004). Based on the site and architectural plans submitted, there are five parking spaces being provided, which is the minimum required by Code. However, this is the minimum number of spaces required. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide the parking necessary for the proposal to ensure adequate off-street parking is provided (to avoid off-site impacts). The architectural plans indicate six exam rooms. Based on general knowledge of this size of a doctor's office, it is presumed there will be at least a receptionist, one nurse and one doctor, each which is also presumed to drive their own vehicle to this place of business. Of the five parking spaces being provided, three of these spaces would then be for employees, leaving only two spaces available for patients. Given these circumstances, Staff is not supportive of the proposal. The architectural plans have been revised to reduce the exam rooms to two and the remainder of the space proposed as office. 8. General Applicability criteria #1 response - Unclear as to what is meant by "the reduction of floor area" in the last sentence, since the plans do not indicate any reduction. Criteria has been revised. 9. General Applicability criteria #2 response - Provide the value of the property after all improvements are constructed. A general value has been added. 10. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response - Need to address the lot width reduction, the reductions to pavement and landscape buffers. The existing condition is a single family dwelling. The proposal is to redevelop to a doctor's office. s (? ?? Criteria has been revised. °---?; ; I ; `r SEP 0 8 2005 I PLr1NP?'' ! > _ 4 313-04 Permits 11. Revise the request to that indicated by Staff above. Ensure the responses to the criteria addresses all portions of the request. Requests have been revised as indicated above. 12. Staff cannot support a setback reduction and a reduction to the landscape buffer to pavement of one-foot to the north property line. The parking space along the north property line has been revised to turf block to provide both a stable parking space and a pervious area which grass will grow. Other: No Comments Sincerely, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL SEP 0 8 2005 9 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:59 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: Draft 9.1.05 DRC comments for 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced case for the September 1, 2005, DRC meeting, to be held at 1:40 pm. Wayne ODII;i? draft 9.1.05 dre action agenda... LL CITY OF CLL .RWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM August 15, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 RE: FLD2005-07077 -- 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07077. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 01, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 11, W" Wa e Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07077 - 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 4:23 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. I am mailing the original. Wayne td, letter of .mpleteness 8.15.05 1?1 Keith Zayac & Associates, Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning August 9, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07077-107 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD Dear Mr. Wells: l? I { .• rns Enclosed please find 15 copies of revised civil engineering plans and other requested attachments addressing comments received on August 7, 2005 addressing the following items: One additional signed and sealed copy of the previously submitted calculations have been added to the submittal. 2. An additional parking space has been added to the site plan. 3. The location of the screened storage area for the black barrel and outside mechanical equipment has been added to the plans. 4. The existing sidewalk along McMullen Booth Road has been enhanced and labeled. 5. Curbing has been added along the northern edge of the proposed sidewalk. 6. The perimeter landscape buffers have been graphically added to the plans. 7. The existing tree locations, sizes and species have been darkened. There are no existing trees proposed for removal however since the site is under 1.0 acres a tree inventory was not completed and therefore the drip line not shown. Please not the existing on-site trees are limited to citrus and camphor trees. 8. A narrative has been added explaining the reasons for the proposed changes and conditions from the previous approval. 9. A comprehensive landscape program application has been added to the submittal. 10. As approved in the previous project as a condition of approval, any signage will be submitted as a separate comprehensive sign package. Sin ly, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. .7 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(@-kefthzayac.com • • HICKEY OFFICE BUILDING NARRATIVE This project is a re-submittal of an approved site plan to modify the following items: • Reduce demolition of existing building to retain majority of existing structure. • Eliminate driveway and parking spaces in rear yard. • Retain existing septic tank and delete off-site sanitary sewer construction. • Move parking to front of building. Conditions of previous approval: 1. That the site plan application be revised to correctly state the required and provide parking prior to building permit. 2. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance. 3. That an approved health department permit be obtain (note required with new design). 4. That an approved SWFWMD permit be approved prior to building permit. 5. That a copy of a right of way permit from Pinellas County for the driveway be provided prior to building permit issuance. 6. That a traffic impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to issuance of CO by applicant. 7. That all proposed on-site utilities be located underground. 8. That all signage meet code, consist of channel letters for any attached signs, and low monument style for a freestanding sign and be architecturally-integrated into the design of the building and site. lj? LE ?UUV I? W', Clearwater August 07, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Suite 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 • CITY OF CLE4P.RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: FLD2005-07077 -- 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07077. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer required on all calculations. 2. Provide a Parking Demand Study in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. 3. Show the location of the storage area for the black barrel and outside mechanical equipment, including all required screening. 4. Show or indicate the location of all existing and proposed sidewalks (if there is one in the right-of-way, indicate such, as there is none indicated on any of the submitted documents or plans). 5. Show the location of curbing of landscaped area, including along the north. 6. Delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers (15 feet buffer along the front [west] property line, 12 feet along the north property line, 12 feet along the south side of the property and 12 feet along the east property line). 7. Show on Sheets 3/6, 4/6, 5/6 and 6/6 ALL existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey). 8. Indicate the conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board) in the narrative and the reasons for the proposed changes proposed. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2003-07077 - 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH LL 0 CITY OF CLRWATER ° ClearWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER.COM August 07, 2005 9. Submit a completed Comprehensive Landscape Program application, providing the justification for the proposed reductions and including a list of those landscape requirements being requested to be modified or waived (currently the application appears to include a reduction to the landscape buffer along the street frontage from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 10.6 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side of the property from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 12 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet). 10. Show the location of any proposed freestanding sign, including the proposed height. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wa?Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07077 - 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 6:57 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Keith - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness regarding the above referenced project. I am faxing this letter also. The original will be mailed. Wayne letter of completeness 8.7.0. FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: ..793' 98 Phone: 713 - 9? 6 S FROM: 11 S Phone: J (9 Z ' J v4' DATE:. RE•-1? LOU J ' 7 q 77 / 0 7 0 c- t-7 MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)_ Aug. 07 2005 07:11PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Aug.07 07:09PM 01'55 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-FELP-FAX C435-7329). • CDB Meeting Date: March 21, 2006 ?i V'It??L Case Numbers: FLD2005-07077 Agenda Item: D2 Owners/Applicants: Patrick and Toni Hickey Representative: Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. Address: 107 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT AMENDED STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: [AS ADVERTISED] Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side .(south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. [AS REVISED FOR THE 3/21/06 CDB MEETING] Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.8 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to six feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 -Page 1 of 10 0 0 Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to ten feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Office (O) District; Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.264 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached dwelling Proposed Use: Office (for doctor) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Office Districts; Detached dwelling (being used without LAND USES: authorization as an attorney office East: County; Detached dwelling South: Low Medium Density Residential District; Detached dwellings West: Institutional District; Calvary Baptist Church (under construction) CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area along McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is of mixed uses. The west side of McMullen Booth Road is currently being developed with the Calvary Baptist Church. The immediately surrounding area south of Drew Street on the east side of McMullen Booth Road is that of detached dwellings. UPDATE: The Community Development Board (CDB) originally scheduled this case for public hearing on October 18, 2005. At the applicant's request, this case was continued to the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting. The CDB at their December 20, 2005, meeting approved the applicant's request for another continuance to the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting to allow for the revision of application material to address Staff concerns outlined in the Staff Report and to provide a joint access driveway and application with the property to the north, which the applicant was unable to bring forward. At the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting, the applicant proposed revisions to the Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 2 of 10 0 0 proposal, which Staff had not reviewed. The CDB continued the request to the March 21, 2006, agenda to allow Staff the ability to review the new proposal. ANAl.VCTC- Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.264 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane. The site has 64 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling. The land use category for this parcel was amended from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and was rezoned from County R-3 zoning to Office District in May 2001 (LUZ 00-08-09). On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028). This request included removing the northern portion of the existing dwelling to provide a 20-foot wide drive aisle to the rear of the property where three parking spaces were to be constructed. The building square footage would have been 962.75 square feet. A stormwater pond was approved in the front of the building. Reductions to side setbacks were approved, providing for a six-foot setback on the north side to the required handicap accessible path to the public sidewalk in the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way and a 10-foot setback to pavement. A side setback to pavement of 9.52 feet was approved on the south side. While two tree removal permits were issued (and the trees removed) based on the CDB approval, no building permit has been applied for to construct the improvements included under FLD2004-04028 within the one year time frame provided by Code nor has there been any time extension approved in order to apply for the building permit. Therefore, the approval under FLD2004-04028 has expired. The surrounding area east of McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is primarily detached dwellings. There is a church south of the single family subdivision directly south of the subject property. The parcel on the east side of McMullen Booth Road between Bay Lane and Drew Street is presently vacant, zoned Office District and has been approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 16, 2004, to permit an 11,350 square foot office building (FLD2003-11061- 117 McMullen Booth Road). This case is now expired as no building permit was submitted to construct the project within the one-year time frame from the CDB approval date. The property directly north at 111 McMullen Booth Road is currently developed with a detached dwelling, but is zoned Office District. Proposal: The proposal is to convert the existing single family dwelling into a doctor's office. The existing building is 1,666 square feet in area, which is proposed to be reduced to 1,393 square feet by primarily removing the rear portion of the garage on the north side. Four parking spaces are proposed on the west side of the building. The existing driveway apron within the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way will be expanded to provide for this nonresidential use. A stormwater pond is proposed within the 15-foot wide perimeter buffer along McMullen Booth Road and along the south property line south of the proposed parking area. The proposal includes utilizing the existing septic tank and drainfield in the rear yard. Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 3 of 10 0 0 The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet. When converting existing detached dwellings located on major arterial or collector roadways, site design usually is complicated and compromised due to adequate lot area, adequate lot width and the physical location of the building on the property. Generally, residential lots are not as wide as nonresidential lots when the subdivision was platted, the dwellings are placed forward on the lot to maximize the rear or private yard (where recreational activities take place) and the dwellings are fairly close to the side property lines. The dimensional requirements for 90-degree parking require a north/south dimension of 43 feet minimum (19-foot parking stall depth plus 24-foot wide drive aisle). Based on the lot width of 64 feet, this leaves only 21 feet to meet setback and buffering requirements. The minimum setback is 20 feet and the minimum landscape buffer is 12 feet for both the north and south sides of the property. The property today utilizes a joint driveway apron on McMullen Booth Road with the property to the north, which is also zoned Office District. The property to the north is presently developed with a detached dwelling just like the subject property and has yet to be redeveloped with a nonresidential use. While it is preferable to redevelop this site in conjunction with a similar office project on the adjacent property to the north with a joint driveway accessing parking for both lots, such proposal has not materialized. Absent this joint driveway accessing parking for both lots (the subject parcel and the parcel to the north), the applicant is attempting to comply with the Code requirements for their lot only. Based on the square footage of the proposed reduced building size and the required parking ratio, the applicant is providing the minimum number of parking spaces (four, including one handicap space). While the Code sets forth the minimum requirements for parking, property owners/developers must provide for their needs. Based on the submitted floor plan converting this dwelling to a doctor's office, the reduced size of the building and the number of parking spaces provided, Staff's is still concerned with the number of parking spaces provided, from the standpoint to avoid off-site parking either into rights-of-way (McMullen Booth Road or Bay Lane) or onto other private property. Any approval should contain a condition prohibiting such off-site parking, unless through a shared parking agreement acceptable to the Planning Department. To ensure the handicap access sidewalk to/from McMullen Booth Road is not compromised by vehicular maneuvering, the proposed vertical curb should be relocated to the south side of the sidewalk. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.8 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to six feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to ten feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet. McMullen Booth Road is designated a scenic corridor. The reduction Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 -Page 4 of 10 0 0 to the front setback still provides adequate landscape area for buffering and beautification to complement this roadway designation. Due to the building's location on the site and the proposed parking area, there is inadequate area to meet the required side setback and buffering provisions, as well as required foundation landscaping. The applicant has provided a larger landscape area along the south side adjacent to detached dwellings as possible, while providing a six-foot landscape area along the north property line adjacent to property also zoned Office District (increased along the north property line over that previously proposed). These proposed setbacks and buffers along the south and north sides of the property are now similar to those previously approved by the CDB under FLD2004-04028 in July 2004. Based on the inability to provide the required setback and landscape buffer areas and the submitted landscape plan, the amount of plant materials should be increased along the areas west of the building to offset the reductions requested and to provide a "tiered" landscape effect (over the minimum landscape requirement). Such "beefed up" landscaping would be consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program that requires the proposed landscaping to be demonstrably more attractive than the minimum standards. Given these circumstances, the requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is justified only by the increased amount of buffering along the south and east by including the solid fence and by increasing the amount of plant material proposed to offset the deficiencies. While not the preferred situation, staff support is based on the increased buffering provided and suggested. The proposal includes the installation of a six-foot high solid vinyl fence along the south and east property lines adjacent to residential zoning and uses. The proposal includes installing landscaping to meet the minimum standards of the Code. However, the applicant proposes to upgrade the size of trees to be planted (shade trees to be 12-foot tall and 4-inch caliper rather than 10-foot tall and 2.5-inch caliper; accent trees to be 10-foot tall rather than eight-foot tall). The accent tree should be 2.5-inch caliper. The installation of the solid fence and larger trees is proposed as a means of mitigating any negative impacts and the loss of tree canopy. All but one tree is proposed to be Drake Elms. There should be greater diversity of tree species to avoid a monoculture. Trees removed from the rear portion of the property (with permits), based on the prior approved Flexible Development case where parking was being provided in the rear yard, produced a tree deficit. The current proposal with its increased tree size and number of trees has corrected this tree deficit. The applicant proposes to remodel the building upgrading the appearance of the building. The interior is proposed with two exam rooms (labeled as offices), a conference room, a receptionist/waiting room area, a break room and a lab. To ensure the conference room does not become a third exam room, the plumbing should be removed from this room. The applicant plans to re-roof the building and paint the exterior with two shades of brown/sand (antique velvet and Newport tint). The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any freestanding sign would be located within the stormwater pond area of the site on the south side or on the north side of the handicap access sidewalk. Any freestanding sign should be monument-style at a maximum height of six feet. The site is proposed to utilize a black barrel for trash, with such being stored in the rear of the building. Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 5 of 10 r: • All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.14 X AREA RATIO 0.40) IMPERVIOUS 0.34 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR 0.75 LOT AREA (3,500 - 11,502 square feet X 10,000 square feet LOT WIDTH (50 - 64.08 feet X* 100 feet FRONT SETBACK 16 feet (to pavement) X* (15 - 25 feet REAR SETBACK (10 84+ feet (to building) X - 20 feet SIDE SETBACK North: 10.8 feet (to existing building); X* (10 - 20 feet) 10 feet (to pavement); six feet (to sidewalk) South: 7.1 feet (to existing building); 9.7 feet (to pavement); 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (30 - 80 feet) 11 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X PARKING SPACES Four spaces X* (2 - 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet; 3 - 4 spaces required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 6 of 10 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-1004.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X* Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X* Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X* shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913). Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X* adjacent land and buildings or significant) impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X* 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X* including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 -Page 7 of 10 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.264 acres is located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane; 2. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling; 3. The land use category for this parcel is Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and is zoned Office District; 4. On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028) in only a 962.75 square- foot portion of the existing building (the balance was to be removed). Parking of three spaces was to be provided to the rear of the building, via a 20-foot drive on the north side of the building. The approval of this case has expired; 5. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet; 6. The proposal is to convert the existing 1,666 square-foot detached dwelling into a doctor's office of 1,393 square feet with four parking spaces, meeting the minimum number of parking spaces required by the Code; 7. The lot width and the physical location of the building on the property presents design constraints to its conversion to a doctor's office; 8. Setbacks and buffer areas are similar to the prior case approved by the CDB in 2004; 9. The proposal includes the elimination of the required five-foot wide foundation landscaping; 10. Additional landscape materials is necessary to offset the reduced areas for buffering and the elimination of the foundation landscaping; 11. The requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is only justified by the provision of the solid fence along the south and east sides of the property and by increasing the amount of landscape material to offset such deficiencies so as to provide an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area and for the enhancement of the community character of the immediate vicinity; 12. Approval of this case is based on the inability to have a joint access drive aisle with the property to the north providing access to parking areas on both sides; and 13. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 8 of 10 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the [AS REVISED FOR THE 3/21/06 CDB MEETING] Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.8 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to six feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-10043, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to ten feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 107 McMullen Booth Road with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible, Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That there be no plumbing in the conference room; 3. That there be no off-site parking within rights-of-way or on other private property, unless through a shared parking agreement acceptable to the Planning Department and recorded in the public records; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised acceptable to the Planning Department: a. increasing the amount of plant materials along the areas west of the building to provide "tiered" landscape effects (over the minimum landscape requirements); b. providing at least one additional tree specie; and c. providing the crape myrtle tree at least 2.5 inch caliper; 5. That the increased tree sizes (height and caliper) indicated on the landscape plan be installed; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised acceptable to Staff: a. providing wheel stops for the parking spaces; and b. relocating the proposed curb along the north side of the handicap access sidewalk to/from McMullen Booth Road to the south side of the sidewalk; Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 9 of 10 • • 7. That the six-foot high solid vinyl fence along the south and east property lines indicated on the site plan be installed, with the height of the fence within the front setback reduced to a maximum of three feet; 8. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum six feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; and 9. That, prior to issuance of any permits, provide a copy of the approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County for the driveway expansion and a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: kjg?4^L Wayne M. ells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: IPlanning Department) C D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases) Up for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - 3.21.06 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 Staff Report for 3.21.06 CDB.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 10 of 10 Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(&myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL • November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). 0 • • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 6 0 V?/ LJ EDENV.00D ST $ < $ a STa HOMEVATOD $ G 0 p ABLE A x SIN 0? D a I 13 - a F V B LL m o PPPLEWDOD ? f .?p Riln EGkB(d Retl Of ? • ??V GV9RB 6S P TRAM s M{f WOOD KAPOK KOVE ,R ' GLEN OK Sm < JOSE T U ? I.N?B ? Tprace VIDW Le. S = = SAN O /Q ORnMD VIEW AVE ? -J M EERWONO T BPo(MMOOON c? l£RRILL AVE D ?J 2F5TEO g THOMn3 RD NOYT AVE VNOI.FE RD PROJECT SITE eaaEUix u 3 C? DREW s o oaa ? S4NDLENOOD ? env u ? env u m 0 CHESAPEAKE ST ' aeaelam p a Ch-y ? VIRGINIA AVE Y JOINS PARKWAY m Q KENTUCKY ?K ° ] ¢ DOWNING STREET TENNES ;;;g O F-1 d , 9 a ?? ?peELL GULF TO BAY BLVD 9 S.R. 66 Cp?7,THEY YG ,.p mW W m Y? S Location Map Owner. I Patrick E. Hickey and Toni V. Hickey Case: FLD2005-07077 Site: 107 McMullen Booth Road Property 0 264 Size(Acres): . PIN: 16/29/16/00000/210/0500 Atlas Page: 292A 0 0 F ? Gli.?!' =LLL ?' L y85 ?, 4 E y 16 A W AIL E y ` i L.•? ?. Aerial Map Owner. Patrick E. Hickey and Toni V. Hickey Case: FLD2005-07077 Site: 107 McMullen Booth Road Property Size(Acres): 0.264 PIN: 16/29/16/00000/210/0500 Atlas Page: 292A 0 0 ? O I Ise- I j0 I r I b 1 1 r N .; i ?_? ,? O l I ' O I i 1 I -_I N t '°A Ii lI I ?a M mt-' in I-- ?S' erl ?-J of L_I 6r? '-{3 mt_ ? g? ? L 0S li CHAMBLEE LIN -_ I , I I I t , I I ?I I I I I L , I 1 1 1L I L J i_J L, I_i -- L_i DREW ST I. MDR N a q V I ??'-t q q ?__ a1 , r O I---' v t i JJ_-I _ 117 Fi 111 1 , l L? Ir'r i? 107 II 1 i 1 I I I I I ; 1 11 1 1 J 1 ^ ? , 1 ? , / 0 IJ I I I I , I I ? tit ?1- ? ? , II6 n I 110 z OD COURT LMD --mot I-112 y RWO I t ; HE FEAT Y C4 n om, r r -1 3 .0 \ j -t 108 - i 1 i I--- 1 1-----' L___ j I 120 "I c?v 1 1I8 - --?--? 16 L14 I 2 I 10 91bot I 8 6 M M Zoning Map Owner. I Patrick E. Hickey and Toni V. Hickey Case: FLD2005-07077 Site: 107 McMullen Booth Road Property 264 0 Size(Acres): . PIN: 16/29/16/00000/210/0500 Atlas Page: 292A • • DI ac eb, O I I -e"r, I Z -j ry l ? I ?il I N ? 1 _1 ' I i M M?-' M t-J -t I- P ? CHAMBLEE LN City Park O ? M--t m - t r 0 j$ 1 ; r i " -- t 00die'a , 1 ? l r l L ? i r I i t _- r_J -? ?- --? DREW ST Dot cTiel we iqg? Vaca?l I _ 117 f Church (under construction) et a 1 I1_I 1 rJL, I t rl I 1, ?-, t------'J t-WSJ I f rr- eta 1 e d ellings -r 10711 t i- I Igo J I l i itac ed 'wed ing I /???\ I16 , 110 p " COURT ; --,; L , i 112 y RWOOD O FEATHE Y O _! m o i+ « l09 "it I I it F" I ) ?+ I 1 \ Church 12o I i t-----? L--- I (under construction) ` 6 r r 00 9Amr I I Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Patrick E. Hickey and Toni V. Hickey Case: FLD2005-07077 Site: 107 McMullen Booth Road Property 0.264 Size(Acres): PIN: 16/29/16/00000/210/0500 Atlas Page: 292A • rmr +? sue'" r .aia View looking northeast at property to the north 107 McMullen Booth Road ago detached dwellings to View looking southeast at de the south of subject property FLD2005-07077 View looking east at north side of existing dwelling and neighbor to the north (111 McMullen Booth Rd View looking east at existing dwelling on the subject property View looking west at south side of rear of subject property (detached dwellings to the left) View looking west at Calvary Baptist across McMullen Booth Rd (under construction) A Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:33 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Deficit has been met. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 7:52 PM To: Albee, Rick Subject: FLD2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road Rick - I gave you a revised site plan package this afternoon for this project (needs to be returned to Sherry). You indicated in your prior reviews (while marked "met") that there was a tree deficit. Could you look at this revised plan and let me know if there really is a deficit or not. They have increased the size of the trees to 4-inch caliper (shade trees). The accent tree will need to be at least 2.5-inch caliper. I am at NIMS training Tuesday. Could you let me know through an email if the proposal is okay or not (or what conditions may be necessary). Thanks. Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:39 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Wayne, Approval conditions for the referenced application: 1. Prior to building permit, provide copy of approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County for driveway expansion. 2. Prior to building permit, relocate proposed curb to between sidewalk and drive aisle. 3. Prior to building permit, provide copy of approved SWFWMD permit. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com i CDB Meeting Date: February 21, 2006 0 ORIGINAL Case Numbers: FLD2005-07077 Agenda Item: D2 Owners/Applicants: Patrick and Toni Hickey Representative: Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. Address: 107 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one- foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Office (O) District; Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.264 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached dwelling Proposed Use: Office (for doctor) Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 1 of 9 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Office Districts; Detached dwelling (being used without LAND USES: authorization as an attorney office East: County; Detached dwelling South: Low Medium Density Residential District; Detached dwellings West: Institutional District; Calvary Baptist Church (under construction) CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area along McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is of mixed uses. The west side of McMullen Booth Road is currently being developed with the Calvary Baptist Church. The immediately surrounding area south of Drew Street on the east side of McMullen Booth Road is that of detached dwellings. UPDATE: The Community Development Board (CDB) originally scheduled this case for public hearing on October 18, 2005. At the applicant's request, this case was continued to the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting. The CDB at their December 20, 2005, meeting approved the applicant's request for another continuance to the February 21, 2006, CDB meeting to allow for the revision of application material to address Staff concerns outlined in the Staff Report and to provide a joint access driveway with the property to the north, which will require re-advertisement of the request. The application is now in front of the CDB as originally requested due to the applicant being unable to bring forward a joint application with the property to the north to provide for a joint access driveway (see attached letter). ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.264 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane. The site has 64 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling. The land use category for this parcel was amended from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and was rezoned from County R-3 zoning to Office District in May 2001 (LUZ 00-08-09). On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028). This request included removing the northern portion of the existing dwelling to provide a 20-foot wide drive aisle to the rear of the property where three parking spaces were to be constructed. The building square footage would have been 962.75 square feet. A stormwater pond was approved in the front of the building. Reductions to side setbacks were approved, providing for a six-foot setback on the north side to the required handicap accessible path to the public sidewalk in the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way and a 10-foot setback to pavement. A side setback to pavement of 9.52 feet was approved on the south side. While two tree removal permits were issued (and the trees removed) based on the CDB approval, no building permit has been applied Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 2 of 9 0 0 for to construct the improvements included under FLD2004-04028 within the one year time frame provided by Code nor has there been any time extension approved in order to apply for the building permit. Therefore, the approval under FLD2004-04028 has expired. The surrounding area east of McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is primarily detached dwellings. There is a church south of the single family subdivision directly south of the subject property. The parcel on the east side of McMullen Booth Road between Bay Lane and Drew Street is presently vacant, zoned Office District and has been approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 16, 2004, to permit an 11,350 square foot office building (FLD2003-11061- 117 N. McMullen Booth Road). This case is now expired as no building permit was submitted to construct the project within the one year time frame from the CDB approval date. The property directly north at 111 McMullen Booth Road is developed with a detached dwelling, zoned Office District and is being used without authorization as an attorney office. The owner has been recently cited for such violation (CDC2005-02522). Proposal: The proposal is to convert the existing 1,608 square-foot single family dwelling into a doctor's office. Four parking spaces are proposed on the west side and one parking space on the north side of the building. The existing driveway will be expanded to provide for this nonresidential use. A stormwater pond is proposed within the 15-foot wide perimeter buffer along McMullen Booth Road. The proposal includes utilizing the existing septic tank and drainfield in the rear yard. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet. When converting existing single family dwellings located on major arterial or collector roadways, site design usually is complicated due to the lot size, lot width and the physical location of the dwelling on the property. Generally, residential lots are not as wide as nonresidential lots when the subdivision was platted, the dwellings are placed forward on the lot to maximize the rear or private yard (where recreational activities take place) and the dwellings are fairly close to the side property lines. A complicating issue to such conversion from residential to nonresidential is adequate lot width. The dimensional requirements for 90-degree parking require a north/south dimension of 43 feet minimum. Based on the lot width of 64 feet, this leaves only 21 feet to meet setback and buffering requirements. The minimum setback is 20 feet and the minimum landscape buffer is 12 feet for both the north and south sides of the property. The property today utilizes a joint driveway on McMullen Booth Road with the property to the north, which is also zoned Office District. As noted above under "Site Location and Existing Conditions," the property to the north appears to being used as an office for an attorney without authorization from the City. Technically, the property to the north is a detached dwelling just like the subject property and must be converted through the Flexible Standard (FLS) or the Flexible Development (FLD) process and building permits for site and building improvements. Staff has discussed with both this applicant and the property owner to the north regarding a joint project, where a joint driveway straddling the property line provides access to both lots and to the rear (east side) of the existing buildings where additional parking could be constructed. This, however, has not yet occurred. Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 3 of 9 • • Absent a joint driveway for both this property and the parcel to the north, the applicant is attempting to comply with the Code requirements for their lot only. Based on the square footage of the existing building and the required parking ratio, the applicant is providing the minimum number of parking spaces (five, including one handicap space). While the Code sets forth the minimum requirements for parking, property owners/developers must provide for their needs. Based on the submitted floor plan for the conversion of the dwelling to a doctor's office with employees, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces provided, Staff's objection includes inadequate parking from a need standpoint to avoid off-site parking either into the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way or into the residential subdivision to the east accessed from Bay Lane. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk). Similarly, the proposal includes reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet. McMullen Booth Road is designated a scenic corridor. The reduction to the front setback still provides adequate landscape area for buffering and beautification to complement this roadway designation. Due to the building's location on the site, the site design compromises the required setback and buffering provisions. In order to comply with the minimum required number of parking spaces, an "employee-only" has been squeezed in on the north side of the building. This northern space presents maneuvering issues and raises handicap access concerns. Due to the required width of this northern space, the setback and buffer for this area has been reduced to one-foot, which is inadequate to provide any landscaping in this area. Staff is unaware of approval of any other requests with such a significant reduction to the setback and buffer requirements. The proposal includes the elimination of the required foundation landscaping, which assists in site beautification not only to the traveling public but also to customers of the business. The requested elimination of the foundation landscaping is part of issue of the building location and parking requirements. As such, the requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is not justified by not providing an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area nor will it enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity. Such approval could set an unnecessary precedent to future cases along McMullen Booth Road and elsewhere in the city and could hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The proposal includes landscaping of the site. There have been trees removed from the rear portion of the property, with permits, but based on the prior approved Flexible Development case where parking was being provided in the rear yard. With this proposal that does not place parking to the rear of the building, the prior tree removal means there is a tree deficit for the property, as those trees would not otherwise been approved to be removed. Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 4 of 9 0 0 The applicant proposes to remodel the building upgrading the appearance of the building. The interior is proposed with two exam rooms, two offices (that look like exam rooms), a conference room, a receptionist/waiting room area, a break room and a lab. The applicant plans to re-roof the building and paint the exterior with two shades of brown/sand (antique velvet and Newport tint). The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any freestanding sign would most likely be located within the stormwater pond area of the site and should be monument style at a maximum height of six feet. The site is proposed to utilize a black barrel for trash, with such being stored in the rear of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 5 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.14 X AREA RATIO 0.40 IMPERVIOUS 0.36 X SURFACE RATIO ISR (0.75) LOT AREA (3,500 - 11,502 square feet X 10,000 square feet LOT WIDTH (50 - 64.08 feet X* 100 feet FRONT SETBACK 16 feet (to pavement) X* 15 - 25 feet REAR SETBACK (10 83+ feet (to building) X - 20 feet) SIDE SETBACK North: 10.7 feet (to existing building); X* (10 - 20 feet) one-foot (to pavement); five feet (to sidewalk) South: 7.1 feet (to existing building); 9.7 feet (to pavement); 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (30 - 80 feet) 11 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X PARKING SPACES Five spaces X* (2 - 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet; 3 - 5 spaces required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 6 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-1004.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X* Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X* Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X* shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. CnMPI.IANCF WITH GENFRAT, STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X* adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X* 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X* including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 7 of 9 0 0 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.264 acres is located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane; 2. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling; 3. The land use category for this parcel is Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and is zoned Office District; 4. On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028) in only a 962.75 square- foot portion of the existing building (the balance was to be removed). Parking of three spaces was to be provided to the rear of the building, via a 20-foot drive on the north side of the building. The approval of this case has expired; 5. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet; 6. The proposal is to convert the existing 1,608 square-foot single family dwelling into a doctor's office with five parking spaces, meeting the minimum requirements of the Code; 7. The lot width and the physical location of the dwelling on the property presents design constraints on the conversion to a doctor's office; 8. Due to the location of the existing building and the required width of the northern parking space, the setback and buffer on the north side has been reduced to one-foot, which is inadequate to provide any landscaping in this area; 9. The proposal includes the elimination of the required five-foot wide foundation landscaping; 10. The requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is not justified by not providing an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area nor enhancement of the community character of the immediate vicinity; 11. Approval of this case could set an unnecessary precedent to future cases along McMullen Booth Road and elsewhere in the city and could hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings; 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL for the Flexible Development application to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 8 of 9 0 0 the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 107 McMullen Booth Road with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: YV k Wayne I Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning DeparimentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) - 2.21.06 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 Staff Report for 2.21.06 CDB.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 21, 2006 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 9 of 9 • Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wellsna myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL • November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • • • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1'/2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board members . / FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III [,/M DATE: December 20, 2005 RE: FLD2005-07077 -107 McMullen Booth Road The "Update" in the Staff Report for this case indicated, as well as the email of request from the applicant's representative, this case should be continued to the January 17, 2006, CDB agenda. Due to some application material issues, this case rather must be continued to the February 21, 2006, CDB agenda. f ? . • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:23 AM To: 'nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Nick - The applicant is aware of the circumstances of how the Board continued this case to the December CDB meeting. I have been in contact with Marian Thompson, neighbor to the subject case and whom spoke at the last meeting, and she is understanding of the need to readvertise this case to now include the parcel owned by the attorney to the north of the subject property. The need to readvertise and reschedule this case to the January 17, 2006, CDB meeting is dictated by Code requirements to include all properties that will be part of the application. The application at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S. Missouri Avenue is also a case that has been requested by the applicant to be continued (to the March 2006 CDB meeting), which was also continued with a similar Board instruction to the applicant as the above case, where neighbors voiced concerns. I have advised the applicant to attend the CDB meeting to explain his continuance request. As with both cases, you will need to weigh all concerns and requirements relative to a CDB decision. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 8:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com' Subject: FW: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Nick I have spoken with the planner Wayne Wells and have forwarded your email for him to respond. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkitts@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Nick Fri [mailto:nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 12:44 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Re: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Sherry, you might check around, I couldn't find this in the minutes, but my "recall" was that the board set this to a date certain in Dec. Nick ----- Original Message ----- From: Sherry.Watkins(amyClearwater.com 12/19/2005 • Page 2 of 2 To: arch p(a)verizon.net ; dana.tallman(aurscorp.com ; ddennehy(o)robelinvestments.com ; dgildersleeve(cDwadetrim.com ; Leslie. Dougall-Sides(a)myClearwater.com ; ggrimes hwhlaw.com ; johnjjhnsn aol.com ; southern (c tampabay.rr.com ; nfritsch(a)tampabay.rr.com ; coatesthomas@earthlink.net Cc: michael.delk(cDMyClearwater.com ; Gina.Clayton myClearwater.com ; neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com ; Steven. Browna myClearwater. corn Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:43 PM Subject: FW: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Good Afternoon CDB members, This email was received regarding FLD.2005-07077, 107 McMullen Booth Road. A copy will also be provided to you at the CDB meeting. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.wa tkins @myclearwater. cons -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:17 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Sherry - Please forward to the CDB members. This was left out of the packets that went out today. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Richard Marcel Subject: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Wayne, We would like to request a continuance for Hickey Office Building from the December's CDB meeting to January's CDB. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/19/2005 0 0 ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owners/Applicants: Representative: Address: December 20, 2005 FLD2005-07077 D4 Patrick and Toni Hickey Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 107 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one- foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Office (O) District; Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.264 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached dwelling Proposed Use: Office (for doctor) Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 1 of 8 • • ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Office Districts; Detached dwelling (being used without LAND USES: authorization as an attorney office East: County; Detached dwelling South: Low Medium Density Residential District; Detached dwellings West: Institutional District; Calvary Baptist Church (under construction) CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area along McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is of mixed uses. The west side of McMullen Booth Road is currently being developed with the Calvary Baptist Church. The immediately surrounding area south of Drew Street on the east side of McMullen Booth Road is that of detached dwellings. UPDATE: This case was continued at the applicant's request at the October 18, 2005, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting to this meeting. The applicant is revising the application material to address Staff concerns outlined in the Staff Report and to provide a joint access driveway with the property to the north, which will require re-advertisement of the request. As such, the applicant is requesting a continuance to the January 17, 2005, meeting of the CDB (see attached email). ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.264 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane. The site has 64 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling. The land use category for this parcel was amended from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and was rezoned from County R-3 zoning to Office District in May 2001 (LUZ 00-08-09). On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028). This request included removing the northern portion of the existing dwelling to provide a 20-foot wide drive aisle to the rear of the property where three parking spaces were to be constructed. The building square footage would have been 962.75 square feet. A stormwater pond was approved in the front of the building. Reductions to side setbacks were approved, providing for a six-foot setback on the north side to the required handicap accessible path to the public sidewalk in the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way and a 10-foot setback to pavement. A side setback to pavement of 9.52 feet was approved on the south side. While two tree removal permits were issued (and the trees removed) based on the CDB approval, no building permit has been applied for to construct the improvements included under FLD2004-04028 within the one year time frame provided by Code nor has there been any time extension approved in order to apply for the building permit. Therefore, the approval under FLD2004-04028 has expired. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 2 of 8 0 0 The surrounding area east of McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is primarily detached dwellings. There is a church south of the single family subdivision directly south of the subject property. The parcel on the east side of McMullen Booth Road between Bay Lane and Drew Street is presently vacant, zoned Office District and has been approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 16, 2004, to permit an 11,350 square foot office building (FLD2003-11061- 117 N. McMullen Booth Road). This case is now expired as no building permit was submitted to construct the project within the one year time frame from the CDB approval date. The property directly north at 111 McMullen Booth Road is developed with a detached dwelling, zoned Office District and is being used without authorization as an attorney office. The owner has been recently cited for such violation (CDC2005-02522). Proposal: The proposal is to convert the existing 1,608 square-foot single family dwelling into a doctor's office. Four parking spaces are proposed on the west side and one parking space on the north side of the building. The existing driveway will be expanded to provide for this nonresidential use. A stormwater pond is proposed within the 15-foot wide perimeter buffer along McMullen Booth Road. The proposal includes utilizing the existing septic tank and drainfield in the rear yard. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet. When converting existing single family dwellings located on major arterial or collector roadways, site design usually is complicated due to the lot size, lot width and the physical location of the dwelling on the property. Generally, residential lots are not as wide as nonresidential lots when the subdivision was platted, the dwellings are placed forward on the lot to maximize the rear or private yard (where recreational activities take place) and the dwellings are fairly close to the side property lines. A complicating issue to such conversion from residential to nonresidential is adequate lot width. The dimensional requirements for 90-degree parking require a north/south dimension of 43 feet minimum. Based on the lot width of 64 feet, this leaves only 21 feet to meet setback and buffering requirements. The minimum setback is 20 feet and the minimum landscape buffer is 12 feet for both the north and south sides of the property. The property today utilizes a joint driveway on McMullen Booth Road with the property to the north, which is also zoned Office District. As noted above under "Site Location and Existing Conditions," the property to the north appears to being used as an office for an attorney without authorization from the City. Technically, the property to the north is a detached dwelling just like the subject property and must be converted through the Flexible Standard (FLS) or the Flexible Development (FLD) process and building permits for site and building improvements. Staff has discussed with both this applicant and the property owner to the north regarding a joint project, where a joint driveway straddling the property line provides access to both lots and to the rear (east side) of the existing buildings where additional parking could be constructed. This, however, has not yet occurred. Absent a joint driveway for both this property and the parcel to the north, the applicant is attempting to comply with the Code requirements for their lot only. Based on the square footage of the existing building and the required parking ratio, the applicant is providing the minimum Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 3 of 8 • number of parking spaces (five, including one handicap space). While the Code sets forth the minimum requirements for parking, property owners/developers must provide for their needs. Based on the submitted floor plan for the conversion of the dwelling to a doctor's office with employees, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces provided, Staff's objection includes inadequate parking from a need standpoint to avoid off-site parking either into the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way or into the residential subdivision to the east accessed from Bay Lane. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk). Similarly, the proposal includes reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet. McMullen Booth Road is designated a scenic corridor. The reduction to the front setback still provides adequate landscape area for buffering and beautification to complement this roadway designation. Due to the building's location on the site, the site design compromises the required setback and buffering provisions. In order to comply with the minimum required number of parking spaces, an "employee-only" has been squeezed in on the north side of the building. This northern space presents maneuvering issues and raises handicap access concerns. Due to the required width of this northern space, the setback and buffer for this area has been reduced to one-foot, which is inadequate to provide any landscaping in this area. Staff is unaware of approval of any other requests with such a significant reduction to the setback and buffer requirements. The proposal includes the elimination of the required foundation landscaping, which assists in site beautification not only to the traveling public but also to customers of the business. The requested elimination of the foundation landscaping is part of issue of the building location and parking requirements. As such, the requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is not justified by not providing an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area nor will it enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity. Such approval could set an unnecessary precedent to future cases along McMullen Booth Road and elsewhere in the city and could hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The proposal includes landscaping of the site. There have been trees removed from the rear portion of the property, with permits, but based on the prior approved Flexible Development case where parking was being provided in the rear yard. With this proposal that does not place parking to the rear of the building, the prior tree removal means there is a tree deficit for the property, as those trees would not otherwise been approved to be removed. The applicant proposes to remodel the building upgrading the appearance of the building. The interior is proposed with two exam rooms, two offices (that look like exam rooms), a conference Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 4 of 8 • • room, a receptionist/waiting room area, a break room and a lab. The applicant plans to re-roof the building and paint the exterior with two shades of brown/sand (antique velvet and Newport tint). The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any freestanding sign would most likely be located within the stormwater pond area of the site and should be monument style at a maximum height of six feet. The site is proposed to utilize a black barrel for trash, with such being stored in the rear of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. rnMPI.TANCR WITH CTANY)ARiIS ANY) CRITERIA! (Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.14 X AREA RATIO 0.40 IMPERVIOUS 0.36 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR 0.75 LOT AREA (3,500 - 11,502 square feet X 10,000 square feet LOT WIDTH (50 - 64.08 feet X* 100 feet FRONT SETBACK 16 feet (to pavement) X* 15 - 25 feet REAR SETBACK (10 83+ feet (to building) X - 20 feet SIDE SETBACK North: 10.7 feet (to existing building); X* (10-2 0 feet) one-foot (to pavement); five feet (to sidewalk) South: 7.1 feet (to existing building); 9.7 feet (to pavement); 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (30 - 80 feet) 11 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X PARKING SPACES Five spaces X* (2 - 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet; 3 - 5 spaces required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 5 of 8 • • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-1004.13): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X* Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X* Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X* shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X* adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X* 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X* including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 6 of 8 0 0 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.264 acres is located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane; 2. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling; 3. The land use category for this parcel is Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and is zoned Office District; 4. On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028) in only a 962.75 square- foot portion of the existing building (the balance was to be removed). Parking of three spaces was to be provided to the rear of the building, via a 20-foot drive on the north side of the building. The approval of this case has expired; 5. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet; 6. The proposal is to convert the existing 1,608 square-foot single family dwelling into a doctor's office with five parking spaces, meeting the minimum requirements of the Code; 7. The lot width and the physical location of the dwelling on the property presents design constraints on the conversion to a doctor's office; 8. Due to the location of the existing building and the required width of the northern parking space, the setback and buffer on the north side has been reduced to one-foot, which is inadequate to provide any landscaping in this area; 9. The proposal includes the elimination of the required five-foot wide foundation landscaping; 10. The requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is not justified by not providing an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area nor enhancement of the community character of the immediate vicinity; 11. Approval of this case could set an unnecessary precedent to future cases along McMullen Booth Road and elsewhere in the city and could hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings; 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL for the Flexible Development application to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 7 of 8 • • the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-10043, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 107 McMullen Booth Road with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: /[X4Ir'R_ M. W Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) -12.20.05 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 Staff Report for 12.20.05 CDB.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 8 of 8 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:17 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Sherry - Please forward to the CDB members. This was left out of the packets that went out today. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Richard Marcel Subject: Hickey CDB (FLD2005-07077) Wayne, We would like to request a continuance for Hickey Office Building from the December's CDB meeting to January's CDB. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/15/2005 0 Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 warne.wells(i ,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). 0 0 Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern = Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-07077 Agenda Item: E7 Owners/Applicants: Patrick and Toni Hickey Representative: Mr. Keith E. Zayac P.E. RLA Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. Address: 107 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one- foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Office (O) District; Residential/Off ce Limited (R/OL) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.264 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached dwelling Proposed Use: Office (for doctor) Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 1 of 8 0 9 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Office Districts; Detached dwelling (being used without LAND USES: authorization as an attorney office East: County; Detached dwelling South: Low Medium Density Residential District; Detached dwellings West: Institutional District; Calvary Baptist Church (under construction) CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area along McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is of mixed uses. The west side of McMullen Booth Road is currently being developed with the Calvary Baptist Church. The immediately surrounding area south of Drew Street on the east side of McMullen Booth Road is that of detached dwellings. ANA1.vcrc- Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.264 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane. The site has 64 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling. The land use category for this parcel was amended from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and was rezoned from County R-3 zoning to Office District in May 2001 (LUZ 00-08-09). On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028). This request included removing the northern portion of the existing dwelling to provide a 20-foot wide drive aisle to the rear of the property where three parking spaces were to be constructed. The building square footage would have been 962.75 square feet. A stormwater pond was approved in the front of the building. Reductions to side setbacks were approved, providing for a six-foot setback on the north side to the required handicap accessible path to the public sidewalk in the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way and a 10-foot setback to pavement. A side setback to pavement of 9.52 feet was approved on the south side. While two tree removal permits were issued (and the trees removed) based on the CDB approval, no building permit has been applied for to construct the improvements included under FLD2004-04028 within the one year time frame provided by Code nor has there been any time extension approved in order to apply for the building permit. Therefore, the approval under FLD2004-04028 has expired. The surrounding area east of McMullen Booth Road south of Drew Street is primarily detached dwellings. There is a church south of the single family subdivision directly south of the subject property. The parcel on the east side of McMullen Booth Road between Bay Lane and Drew Street is presently vacant, zoned Office District and has been approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 16, 2004, to permit an 11,350 square foot office building (FLD2003-11061- 117 N. McMullen Booth Road). This case is now expired as no building permit was submitted to construct the project within the one year time frame from the CDB approval date. The property directly north at 111 McMullen Booth Road is developed with a Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 2 of 8 0 0 zoned Office District and is being used without authorization as an attorney office. The owner has been recently cited for such violation (CDC2005-02522). Proposal: The proposal is to convert the existing 1,608 square-foot single family dwelling into a doctor's office. Four parking spaces are proposed on the west side and one parking space on the north side of the building. The existing driveway will be expanded to provide for this nonresidential use. A stormwater pond is proposed within the 15-foot wide perimeter buffer along McMullen Booth Road. The proposal includes utilizing the existing septic tank and drainfield in the rear yard. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet. When converting existing single family dwellings located on major arterial or collector roadways, site design usually is complicated due to the lot size, lot width and the physical location of the dwelling on the property. Generally, residential lots are not as wide as nonresidential lots when the subdivision was platted, the dwellings are placed forward on the lot to maximize the rear or private yard (where recreational activities take place) and the dwellings are fairly close to the side property lines. A complicating issue to such conversion from residential to nonresidential is adequate lot width. The dimensional requirements for 90-degree parking require a north/south dimension of 43 feet minimum. Based on the lot width of 64 feet, this leaves only 21 feet to meet setback and buffering requirements. The minimum setback is 20 feet and the minimum landscape buffer is 12 feet for both the north and south sides of the property. The property today utilizes a joint driveway on McMullen Booth Road with the property to the north, which is also zoned Office District. As noted above under "Site Location and Existing Conditions," the property to the north appears to being used as an office for an attorney without authorization from the City. Technically, the property to the north is a detached dwelling just like the subject property and must be converted through the Flexible Standard (FLS) or the Flexible Development (FLD) process and building permits for site and building improvements. Staff has discussed with both this applicant and the property owner to the north regarding a joint project, where a joint driveway straddling the property line provides access to both lots and to the rear (east side) of the existing buildings where additional parking could be constructed. This, however, has not yet occurred. Absent a joint driveway for both this property and the parcel to the north, the applicant is attempting to comply with the Code requirements for their lot only. Based on the square footage of the existing building and the required parking ratio, the applicant is providing the minimum number of parking spaces (five, including one handicap space). While the Code sets forth the minimum requirements for parking, property owners/developers must provide for their needs. Based on the submitted floor plan for the conversion of the dwelling to a doctor's office with employees, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces provided, Staff's objection includes inadequate parking from a need standpoint to avoid off-site parking either into the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way or into the residential subdivision to the east accessed from Bay Lane. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 3 of 8 0 0 The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk). Similarly, the proposal includes reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet. McMullen Booth Road is designated a scenic corridor. The reduction to the front setback still provides adequate landscape area for buffering and beautification to complement this roadway designation. Due to the building's location on the site, the site design compromises the required setback and buffering provisions. In order to comply with the minimum required number of parking spaces, an "employee-only" has been squeezed in on the north side of the building. This northern space presents maneuvering issues and raises handicap access concerns. Due to the required width of this northern space, the setback and buffer for this area has been reduced to one-foot, which is inadequate to provide any landscaping in this area. Staff is unaware of approval of any other requests with such a significant reduction to the setback and buffer requirements. The proposal includes the elimination of the required foundation landscaping, which assists in site beautification not only to the traveling public but also to customers of the business. The requested elimination of the foundation landscaping is part of issue of the building location and parking requirements. As such, the requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is not justified by not providing an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area nor will it enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity. Such approval could set an unnecessary precedent to future cases along McMullen Booth Road and elsewhere in the city and could hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. The proposal includes landscaping of the site. There have been trees removed from the rear portion of the property, with permits, but based on the prior approved Flexible Development case where parking was being provided in the rear yard. With this proposal that does not place parking to the rear of the building, the prior tree removal means there is a tree deficit for the property, as those trees would not otherwise been approved to be removed. The applicant proposes to remodel the building upgrading the appearance of the building. The interior is proposed with two exam rooms, two offices (that look like exam rooms), a conference room, a receptionist/waiting room area, a break room and a lab. The applicant plans to re-roof the building and paint the exterior with two shades of brown/sand (antique velvet and Newport tint). The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any freestanding sign would most likely be located within the stormwater pond area of the site and should be monument style at a maximum height of six feet. The site is proposed to utilize a black barrel for trash, with such being stored in the rear of the building. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 4 of 8 0 0 All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-1001.1 and 2-1004): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.14 X AREA RATIO (0.40) IMPERVIOUS 0.36 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR (0.75) LOT AREA (3,500 - 11,502 square feet X 10,000 square feet) LOT WIDTH (50 - 64.08 feet X* 100 feet) FRONT SETBACK 16 feet (to pavement) X* (15 - 25 feet) REAR SETBACK (10 83+ feet (to building) X - 20 feet SIDE SETBACK North: 10.7 feet (to existing building); X* (10 - 20 feet) one-foot (to pavement); five feet (to sidewalk) South: 7.1 feet (to existing building); 9.7 feet (to pavement); 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (30 - 80 feet) 11 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X PARKING SPACES Five spaces X* (2 - 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet; 3 - 5 spaces required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 5 of 8 • • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FT.F.XTRTT.ITV f RTTF.RTA (Sectinn 2_1004_R): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X* Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X* Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X* shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X* adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X* 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X* including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 6 of 8 0 0 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.264 acres is located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane; 2. The site is currently developed with a detached dwelling; 3. The land use category for this parcel is Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and is zoned Office District; 4. On July 20, 2004, the Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development case for this property to permit a doctor's office (FLD2004-04028) in only a 962.75 square- foot portion of the existing building (the balance was to be removed). Parking of three spaces was to be provided to the rear of the building, via a 20-foot drive on the north side of the building. The approval of this case has expired; 5. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet; 6. The proposal is to convert the existing 1,608 square-foot single family dwelling into a doctor's office with five parking spaces, meeting the minimum requirements of the Code; 7. The lot width and the physical location of the dwelling on the property presents design constraints on the conversion to a doctor's office; 8. Due to the location of the existing building and the required width of the northern parking space, the setback and buffer on the north side has been reduced to one-foot, which is inadequate to provide any landscaping in this area; 9. The proposal includes the elimination of the required five-foot wide foundation landscaping; 10. The requested flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, buffer widths and foundation landscaping is not justified by not providing an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area nor enhancement of the community character of the immediate vicinity; 11. Approval of this case could set an unnecessary precedent to future cases along McMullen Booth Road and elsewhere in the city and could hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings; 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL for the Flexible Development application to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 7 of 8 0 0 the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 20 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 107 McMullen Booth Road with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: /t-(. ?/& Wayne M. ells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S.Wlonning DeparaneiWC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 107 Hickey Office Building #2 (O) -10.18.05 CDB - WWIMcMullen Booth 107 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07077 - Page 8 of 8 File Edit Options iridok+\, Help X1-4 In ? U i Exit New Caper. Task Lit QSE GIs Lr? D ` 123 close View Add Delete Inert Renumber Multi-Case Print Edit Condition LRR1 iLAND RESOURCE CONDITION Updated 912012005 By R?_A Condition Met: F Date /19/2005 By R_A Hold Level Warning Report Tag LRR Condition Text Revise the tree removal calculations to reflect that 37 inches are required to be replaced and modify the landscape plan showing additional tree prior to building permit. DRC Decision: 9-Q1-2005 DONE N: S: CDB Decision: 0-00-0000 E: _ W: _ Help } K Cancel J W 101 - - - - --- - - --- - - ------ --- I Print case condition listing ;Start , ( ?Inbox - „ Tidemar.. JMcMullen.,. McMullen y{lO Qckob Windows,.. Bayv ay , C McMullen... dal, 10:48 AM ;.; 9 0 9 Conditions Associated With FLD2005-07077 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH ~ ?i'llfllil) Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/24/2005 Sheet 6/6 - Landscape plan does not provide the required plantings and trees within the required buffers of Section 3-1202.D.1. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 08/16/2005 Driveway width must meet Fire Department's approval. 9/12/05 - MET 2. Parking space adjacent to building does not have the 24' wide drive aisle for backing out. 9/2/05 - SR - PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE ACCEPTABLE AS DESIGNED IF SPACE DESIGNATED AS EMPLOYEE PARKING. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 3. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 9/12/05 - MOT MET 4. What happens to the adjacent property owner's driveway to the north? 9/12/05 - SEE APLLICANT RESPONSE All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/07/2005 9/18/05 - WW Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/7/05 - WW Show the location of any proposed freestanding sign, including the proposed height. Not Met Not Met Not Met 08/24/2005 Sheet A1.0 shows a new 3'x4' window on the west side of the south elevation. However, the Not Met south elevation on Sheet A1.1 shows a door. Revise the south elevation on Sheet A1.1. 08/24/2005 The proposal is to convert an existing single family dwelling for a doctor's office. There was a Not Met prior approval by the CDB to redevelop the site, tearing down a portion of the building in order to construct parking, stormwater and landscaping improvements, providing the minimum required parking (FLD2004-04028, approved by the CDB on July 20, 2004). Based on the site and architectural plans submitted, there are five parking spaces being provided, which is the minimum required by Code. However, this is the minimum number of spaces required. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide the parking necessary for the proposal to ensure adequate off-street parking is provided (to avoid off-site impacts). The architectural plans indicate six exam rooms. Based on general knowledge of this size of a doctor's office, it is presumed there will be at least a receptionist, one nurse and one doctor, each which is also presumed to drive their own vehicle to this place of business. Of the five parking spaces being provided, three of these spaces would then be for employees, leaving only two spaces available for patients. Given these circumstances, Staff is not supportive of the proposal. Print Date: 10/13/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 0 0 FLD2005-07077 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/29/2005 Staff cannot support a setback reduction and a reduction to the landscape buffer to pavement of Not Met one-foot to the north property line. Print Date: 10/13/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 12:57 PM To: 'keith@keithzayac.com' Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Keith, I discussed parking space #1 near the north boundary of the subject site with Traffic. If the parking space is designated as employee (owner) and a note added to the Site Plan indicating this, the current drive aisle is acceptable. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:56 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Wayne, Accessible route criteria no met: 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 3. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 9/12/05 - MOT MET D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:09 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB Sorry for the late response 1101 Ft Harrison- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 1770 Drew St- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 1100 Cleveland St- Some conditions met and others modified, Permit Plan updated. 211 Skiff- No Issues. 2430 Gulf to Bay- No Issues. 810 Missouri- No Issues. 107 McMullen- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 665 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 1825 Sunset Pt- No Issues. 862 Bayway- No Issues. -----Original Message----- . From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:36 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-06053 1101 S Ft Harrison Avenue Cristino's Restaurant Planner Mike R. 2. FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive Planner: John S. 3. FLD2005-07067 1100 Cleveland Street Clearwater Center Planner: Robert T. 4. FLD2005-04036 211 Skiff Point Mirabel Pointe Planner: Robert T. 5. FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd DC Customs Planner: John S 6. FLD2005-07076 810 Missouri Avenue Renaissance Square Condo's Planner: Wayne W 7. FLD2005-07077 107' Mc Mullen Bth RD Dr Hickey Office Planner: Wayne W 8. FLD2005-07078 665 Bay Esplanade Nepenthe Planner: Robert T 9. FLD2005-07079 1825 Sunset Pt Road Bank & Office Planner Wayne W 10. FLD2005-07080 862 Bayway Blvd Regatta Bay Planner Wayne W I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Have a Great Day! Thank you, 1 Sherry Watkins • 1 Planning Department -0j IC ?7 ?7 Clearwater PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING / GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.:(727)562-4750, Fax:(727)526-4755 www.MyCle.rwater.com Disdainier: Pu.lic in.......ien Ua/a rs luuuseetl OY Oro Gry W L'4•nwaler PuElic Wtr/NY n,fn,inisva IEnpinep,inp, one...slhe a...Plee aM usetl Ey lRn.enpienl with IIIe uneersMnOinq Ihal me tlala 'veE was cullncletl tar eIa pu,puzp el tlevalupmg a g.apluc nliesVUCfu.e Mvenle.y. ns tvclt ilia Ciry el Ole;vwate. P WAIE nuXes nd wa.renlies. eapenatl w ir,p?en. ca corning tlIe eeYec mplelunesr. ;eliaCilty, o, suilab/ey of mia tla/a !p, any oderpe i ular use. Furple;mwe, nu Ciy of Clea.wale. PWNE p/such Oplals Y W.sonve.uaso<Mlee wRn eia use or m/swe N w?e aw p .a I 5 RESIDENiML -liar" S LDR wDR?say Reaeennal NMDR Now Mearv.n De.sny Resee.rval MDq .n De.say ResAemial AwOR MPdvm q?qn wmey gn?eenRl RllR assay Ra+eu.?ai LRNCODCOenmanegi.geN g pe,rv,.p Cwn.i.nw,? D E- tENCOD l U Esialea N„gwanow Co??sa?.aiwe COMMER--S1RiCIS SPECIIL USE DISI-IS OOn?ee al. gese.n'naM le<nndo3y D. Down,u,n OYR. pPoe,,p„n„a ?M City Owned Property Agreement to Annex o Annexation o Deannexation Correction o Rezoning Cl ] SUB NUMBER ' R t _ ( a " to Plat) //? ? 1\ 1 // BLOCK NUMBER O SUB PARCEL N B DtroZ UM ER PARCEL NUMBER tMBB • ) LAND HOOK ICOMMON OWNERSHIPI ?. ? PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 0 COUNTYHIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY ( ? I9 \ U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas May 06. 2005 NW 114 of 16-29- 16 292A • • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:36 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-06053 1101 S Ft Harrison Avenue Cristino's Restaurant Planner Mike R. 2. FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive Planner: John S. 3. FLD2005-07067 1100 Cleveland Street Clearwater Center Planner: Robert T. 4. FLD2005-04036 211 Skiff Point Mirabel Pointe Planner: Robert T. 5. FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd DC Customs Planner: John S 6. FLD2005-07076 810 Missouri Avenue Renaissance Square Condo's Planner: Wayne W 7. FLD2005-07077 107 Mc Mullen Bth RD Dr Hickey Office Planner: Wayne W 8. FLD2005-07078 665 Bay Esplanade Nepenthe Planner: Robert T 9. FLD2005-07079 1825 Sunset Pt Road Bank & Office Planner Wayne W 10. FLD2005-07080 862 Bayway Blvd Regatta Bay Planner Wayne W I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Have a Great Day! Thank you, Sherry Watkins Planning Department Case Number: FLD2005-07 077 -- 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH F 1:40 pm Owner(s): Patrick E Hickey O 1775 Split Fork Dr Oldsmar, 34677 TELEPHONE: : No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, F1 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.264 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane. Atlas Page: 292A Zoning District: O, Office Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an office with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement), from 20 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to one-foot (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 20 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to required parking from five spaces to four spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the street frontage from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement), from 12 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk) and from 12 feet to one-foot (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side of the property from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 12 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn, Bill Buzzell Applicant/Rep: Keith Zayac, Patrick Hickey The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Note: A sanitary sewer main extension project may create an opportunity for property owner to connect to City of Clearwater sanitary sewer system. Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773 for details. 2) Delete Sheet #2, will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Show on plan that driveway entrance is 24' wide. PRIOR TO CDB Move location of fire hydrant closer to driveway with steamer facing street and show on plan. PRIOR TO CDB Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 36 Harbor Master: • • 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Show that the two citrus trees have already been removed prior to building permit. 2 . Revise the tree removal calculations to reflect that 37 inches are required to be replaced and modify the landscape plan showing additional tree prior to building permit. Landscaping: I , As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, provide the justification for the proposed reductions and include a list of those landscape requirements being requested to be modified or waived (currently the application appears to include a reduction to the landscape buffer along the street frontage from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side of the property from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 12 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet). 2. Sheets 4-6/6 - Plans do not comply with Section 3-1202.D.2, which states "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Provide the flat area of a minimum of five feet in width. 3 . Sheet 6/6 - Landscape plan does not provide the required plantings and trees within the required buffers of Section 3-1202.D.1. Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues - less than one acre. Stormwater: I . Before Building Permit 1) Please provide copy of County drainage connection permit and verify that 12" PVC is acceptable. 2) Dry retention ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less. Solid Waste: 1 . No more than 2 black barrels. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Driveway width must meet Fire Department's approval. 2. Parking space adjacent to building does not have the 24' wide drive aisle for backing out. 9/2/05 - SR - PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE ACCEPTABLE AS DESIGNED IF SPACE DESIGNATED AS EMPLOYEE PARKING. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 3. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 4. What happens to the adjacent property owner's driveway to the north? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 37 1 . Indicate the conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board) in the narrative and the reasons for the proposed changes proposed. 2. Show the location of any proposed freestanding sign, including the proposed height. 3. Sheet 5/6 - Darken the existing water main to the building (too light). 4. According to Solid Waste, the black barrel is placed next to the pavement of McMullen Booth. As such, remove the staging area from the plans. 5. Sheet A 1.0 shows anew 3'x4' window on the west side of the south elevation. However, the south elevation on Sheet ALL shows a door. Revise the south elevation on Sheet A1.1. 6. Unclear as to the purpose of the aerial showing an easement over the property to the north as part of the Drainage Report, since that property is not part of the application. Advise. 7. The proposal is to convert an existing single family dwelling for a doctor's office. There was a prior approval by the CDB to redevelop the site, tearing down a portion of the building in order to construct parking, stormwater and landscaping improvements, providing the minimum required parking (FLD2004-04028, approved by the CDB on July 20, 2004). Based on the site and architectural plans submitted, there are five parking spaces being provided, which is the minimum required by Code. However, this is the minimum number of spaces required. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide the parking necessary for the proposal to ensure adequate off-street parking is provided (to avoid off-site impacts). The architectural plans indicate six exam rooms. Based on general knowledge of this size of a doctor's office, it is presumed there will be at least a receptionist, one nurse and one doctor, each which is also presumed to drive their own vehicle to this place of business. Of the five parking spaces being provided, three of these spaces would then be for employees, leaving only two spaces available for patients. Given these circumstances, Staff is not supportive of the proposal. 8 . General Applicability criteria #1 response - Unclear as to what is meant by "the reduction of floor area" in the last sentence, since the plans do not indicate any reduction. 9. General Applicability criteria #2 response - Provide the value of the property after all improvements are constructed. 10. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response - Need to address the lot width reduction, the reductions to pavement and landscape buffers. The existing condition is a single family dwelling. The proposal is to redevelop to a doctor's office. 11 . Revise the request to that indicated by Staff above. Ensure the responses to the criteria addresses all portions of the request. 12 . Staff cannot support a setback reduction and a reduction to the landscape buffer to pavement of one-foot to the north property line. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/18/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 38 _ . 't. ? • _ 1:40 Am Case Number: FLD2005-07077 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH Owner(s): Patrick E Hickey 1775 Split Fork Dr Oldsmar, 34677 TELEPHONE: : No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.264 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 100 feet south of Bay Lane. Atlas Page: 292A Zoning District: 0, Office Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an office with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 63.75 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to one-foot (to pavement), from 20 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to one-foot (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 20 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to required parking from five spaces to four spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the street frontage from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement), from 12 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk) and from 12 feet to one-foot (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side of the property from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 12 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart Applicant/Rep: Keith Zayac, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1) Note: A sanitary sewer main extension project may create an opportunity for property owner to connect to City of Clearwater sanitary sewer system. Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773 for details. 2) Delete Sheet #2, will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: No Issues Fire: ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. 2 . Show on plan that driveway entrance is 24' wide. PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Move location of fire hydrant closer to driveway with steamer facing street and show on plan. PRIOR TO CDB Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 36 Harbor Master: • • 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Show that the two citrus trees have already been removed prior to building permit. 2 . Revise the tree removal calculations to reflect that 37 inches are required to be replaced and modify the landscape plan showing additional tree prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, provide the justification for the proposed reductions and include a list of those landscape requirements being requested to be modified or waived (currently the application appears to include a reduction to the landscape buffer along the street frontage from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to one-foot (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 5.6 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side of the property from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building) and from 12 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet). 2 . Sheets 4-6/6 - Plans do not comply with Section 3-1202.D.2, which states "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Provide the flat area of a minimum of five feet in width. 3 . Sheet 6/6 - Landscape plan does not provide the required plantings and trees within the required buffers of Section 3-1202.D.1. Parks and Recreation: No issues - less than one acre. Stormwater: 1 . Before Building Permit 1) Please provide copy of County drainage connection permit and verify that 12" PVC is acceptable. 2) Dry retention ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less. Solid Waste: 1 No more than 2 black barrels. Traffic Engineering: 1 , Driveway width must meet Fire Department's approval. 2. Parking space adjacent to building does not have the 24' wide drive aisle for backing out. 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 3. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 4. What happens to the adjacent property owner's driveway to the north? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 37 I . Indicate the conditi• of a previous development approval (e.g. con i ions imposed by the Community Development Board) in the narrative and the reasons for the proposed changes proposed. 2. Show the location of any proposed freestanding sign, including the proposed height. 3. Sheet 5/6 - Darken the existing water main to the building (too light). 4. According to Solid Waste, the black barrel is placed next to the pavement of McMullen Booth. As such, remove the staging area from the plans. 5. Sheet Al .0 shows a new 3'x4' window on the west side of the south elevation. However, the south elevation on Sheet A1.1 shows a door. Revise the south elevation on Sheet A1.1. 6. Unclear as to the purpose of the aerial showing an easement over the property to the north as part of the Drainage Report, since that property is not part of the application. Advise. 7. The proposal is to convert an existing single family dwelling for a doctor's office. There was a prior approval by the CDB to redevelop the site, tearing down a portion of the building in order to construct parking, stormwater and landscaping improvements, providing the minimum required parking (FLD2004-04028, approved by the CDB on July 20, 2004). Based on the site and architectural plans submitted, there are five parking spaces being provided, which is the minimum required by Code. However, this is the minimum number of spaces required. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide the parking necessary for the proposal to ensure adequate off-street parking is provided (to avoid off-site impacts). The architectural plans indicate six exam rooms. Based on general knowledge of this size of a doctor's office, it is presumed there will be at least a receptionist, one nurse and one doctor, each which is also presumed to drive their own vehicle to this place of business. Of the five parking spaces being provided, three of these spaces would then be for employees, leaving only two spaces available for patients. Given these circumstances, Staff is not supportive of the proposal. 8 . General Applicability criteria #1 response - Unclear as to what is meant by "the reduction of floor area" in the last sentence, since the plans do not indicate any reduction. 9. General Applicability criteria #2 response - Provide the value of the property after all improvements are constructed. 10. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response - Need to address the lot width reduction, the reductions to pavement and landscape buffers. The existing condition is a single family dwelling. The proposal. is to redevelop to a doctor's office. 11 . Revise the request to that indicated by Staff above. Ensure the responses to the criteria addresses all portions of the request. 12 . Staff cannot support a setback reduction and a reduction to the landscape buffer to pavement of one-foot to the north property line. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 9/30/05 for review by DRC on 11/3/05. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 38 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 16 29 16 00000 210 0 Page 2 of 5 10 1 29 10 00000 210 0500 07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:01:48 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales HICKEY, PATRICK E OBK: 13320 OPG: 1285 HICKEY, TONI U 1775 SPLIT FORK DR OLDSMAR FL 34677-2769 EVAC: Hon-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD N of Jan 1, 2004, rased on Census Tract: 268.09 sales from 2002 - 2003: 157,700 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 1 /2,004 13,320/1,285 2i0,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1,997 9,84311,576 69,900 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/1,990 7,4451 28 45,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 O/ 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market; 141,100 Homestead: YES Ownership % 1.000 SAVE-OUR-HOMES CAP Govt Exem: NO Use %: 1.000 Assessed/Cap: 53,700 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 28,700 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 659.22 1) 64 x 180 11.50 11, 520.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 2,666.75 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 3,240.98 Short Legal S 64FT OF N 331.1FT OF E 180FT OF W 230FT OF HE 1/4 Description OF HW 114 L Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.usihtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 ; Pinf.llas County Property Appwr Information: 16 29 16 00000 210 0i Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 10 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 210 0500 :01 07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:01:48 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 210 Land Use: 01 Living Units: 1 Imp Type: Single Family Prop Address: 107 HCHULLEN BOOTH RD N STruc-tural E1.qBmen-ts Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Roof Frame Gable-Hip Roof Cover Composite Shingle # Stories 1.0 Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 25 Heating Central Duct Cooling Cooling (Central) Fixtures 3 Other Depreciation 0 Functional Depreciation 0 Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 i,087 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .20 20 8) .00 0 3) Garage .35 288 9) .00 0 4) Open Porch 15 168 10) .00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 Roside:yiTial ExTra F?a-tur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) []?]K ®PCF FQ Fq_1 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 Pinp.llas County Property App*r Information: 16 29 16 00000 210 000 V! m 6 It LP, r I..V Page 4 of 5 N, NRBL L« AvO LN NIG LN ` 0 v Lf L M LnCS9 vh BL( 7 L d LN LN DREW FEATHERWOUU r!] F`AI %fADV r1oC'hI 313 GRE S, 7 DIDI C- r- LJI I 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 I'll- I'I GRIPrh I'!01),:rP" .A1)1i-er 1111'0rn1atIoll 10 29 16 Ol)UU(I ? IM) 6 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to _Search Page An explanation of this s.c..reen http:,`/pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: . Monday, January 24, 2005 1:33 PM To: 'Keith Zayac' Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Hickey Office Keith - The property to the east is currently located in unincorporated Pinellas County, designated Residential Urban (RU) land use (County) and is zoned residential (County). First, this lot would need to be annexed into the City. Second, one option is to bring the lot into the City with RU (City) land use and LMDR zoning (City). No problem. As we discussed previously, nonresidential off-street parking is a Flexible Development use in the LMDR District, which could be requested. The other option, which you are asking here, is to amend the land use designation to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) and rezone to Office (O) District. I have checked with Gina Clayton regarding this latter option. We would not support such a request. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to call or email me. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [ma i Ito: keith@ keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:44 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Hickey Office Wayne, the other question I forgot to bring up is the potential for rezoning the property behind the existing site that he is looking at purchasing to "Office". This would allow him to use the existing house as another office. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 5/10/2006 171 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February 21, 2006, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. (Cont'd from 12-20-05) Patrick & Toni Hickey are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 64.08 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec. 16-29-16 M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 07077 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL '4' . *? 9 0 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 02/06/06 FLD2005-07077 = 50 ACCETTA, JOHN J ACCETTA, ALLATHAI 11770 BARB CT LARGO FL 33778 - 3803 BELCHER, H STEVEN 1504 JAN ANN CT WASHINGTON IN 47501 - 3746 CALVARY OPEN BIBLE CHURCH 11 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4419 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Sondra Kerr, President P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, FL 33758 CONNOLLY, MATTHEW J 120 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 DAMIANAKIS, ANTHONY R DAMIANAKIS, EKATERINI 111 MC MULLEN BOOTH RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEARW 331 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002 GRIZZLE, ANTHONY D 3101 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HUNT, CHRISTINE A 3136 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 ALBRECHT, CHRISTIAN D ALBRECHT, CAROL F 112 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 BHAME, KATHY L 3142 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CHILDERS, CHERYL A PO BOX 730 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 0730 CLINE, EHREN M 3116 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401 CURRY, TONJA 116 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 D'AMICO, FRANK A JR D'AMICO, JOHONNA H 3100 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 FRANKICH, PETER N 3125 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HARBERSON, VICTOR G 3131 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 KACZOR, JERZY KACZOR, ALICJA 3112 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 • + ` BAILEY, MONTIE R JR 3119 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 BLACK, BARRY J BLACK, NATALIE B 3141 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 CLARK, THOMAS B 3149 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 COLGAN, CATHERINE SEYLER, MARTHA J 3155 FEATHERSOUND CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - DABIRI, MASSOUD DABIRI, MALOUSE 3024 HAVERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4023 EZELL, WILLIAM J EZELL, DEBORAH A 3149 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 GOSNELL, JAN T 3118 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL-33759 - 4412 HICKEY, PATRICK E HICKEY, TONI V 1775 SPLIT FORK DR OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2769 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 KLEINMAN, ERIC KOWBEL, GREGORY A MAI, NGA KLEINMAN, TERRI KOWBEL, WANDA J 3107 CHAMBLEE LN 3070 GRAND VIEW AVE 3107 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3445 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 MORA, ALBERT J MURRAY, LA VONNE NICKERSON, RONALD H LEI, SOI SAM 3124 BAY LN NICKERSON, DEBORAH H 3115 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401 108 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 NOLL, DAN L PASSARIS, ELEFTHERIOS PERFEITO, ANTHONY 3133 BAY LN PASSARIS, MARIA PERFEITO, ANA CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 3106 CHAMBLEE LN 3137 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 PFEIFFER, PAUL R PLEINES, HOWARD RAAB, DONNA R 3141 FEATHERWOOD CT 3125 CHAMBLEE LN 3130 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 REESE, DONNA L ROTELLA, THOMAS R SALIM, THEODORE N 1660 69TH AVE S ROTELLA, CYNTHIA L SALIM, AMAL G ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 5923 124 K ST 3113 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER A SMITH, ERIC O SOFARELLI, ANDREA D 3133 DREW ST SMITH, COLLEEN P 3137 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 3131 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 SWEZEY, TIMOTHY THOMSON, MARION TIZON, VELMA W 3137 BAY LN 3106 FEATHERWOOD CT TIZON, ALFREDO CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 3129 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 TULLY, JOE WALSH, EDWARD J WELCH, JERRY RAY TULLY, CYNTHIA L WALSH, LORRAINE E 3124 FEATHERWOOD CT 3148 FEATHERWOOD CT 3121 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 t • CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 20, 2005, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along South Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470, & 1480 S Missouri Ave, , A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 64.08 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: &?yne-M -We11s;_ATCP,-Planer III. cFL-D20057n ?07A7a= 3. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Ft Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Ft Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06053 4. (Cont'd from 11-15-05) Peter Pan Developments LLC (Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Petrit Meroli, Somerset Condominium) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 15,000 sq ft to 13,087 sq ft, reductions to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 120 ft along Bay Esplanade and from 150 ft to 110 ft along Somerset St, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 11 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Bay Esplanade from 5 ft to 3 ft (for the retention pond planting area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 693- 699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 76 & unplatted Blk 76. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08090 5. Clearwater Townhomes Inc (Roland Rogers) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of a pool to a previously approved attached dwelling project (FLD2002-11042, approved January 21, 2003) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval revising the previously recorded plat to provide for the proposed pool (PLT2005-00026). (Proposed Use: Addition of pool to townhomes) at 161 Brightwater Dr, Island Townhomes, Lots 1-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09095/PLT2005-00026 6. Carlouel Yacht Corp. is requesting Flexible Development approval for the expansion of an existing commercial dock (10' x 107' floating dock addition to an existing 10' x 250' floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 226.13 ft to 3.3 ft, under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing commercial dock) at 1091 Eldorado Ave, Mandalay Replat Blk 171, Lots 6-11 & part of Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09094 7. Miriam L Cebula, & Harley P and Sharon R Evans (GFB Development, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 27 attached dwelling units in the High Density Residential (HDR) District with an increase to ht from 30 ft to 79 ft (to roof deck) with an increase to the ht of the parapet from 30 inches to 90 inches (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 21 ft (to building) and 12 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and 8 ft (to pavement) as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-504.F. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 125 & 143 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07062 8. Georgia Street Properties LLC, 302-308 N Osceola Properties LLC, Belvedere Land Trust, Church of Scientology Flag Svc Org Inc, Osceola-Jones Properties LLC, & Triangle S A Land LLC (Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC, Triangle Development Company LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development (324 attached dwelling units and 26,124 sq ft of non-residential floor area), an increase in the permitted ht from 30 ft to 169 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 28 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) for that portion of the development on the west side of N Osceola Ave, an additional 21 ft (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for that portion of the development on the east side of N Osceola Ave as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use) at 302, 303, 304, 308 and 309 North Osceola Ave; 410 Jones St; and 410 N Ft Harrison Ave, A. B. & Jennie Cate's Sub Lots 1-7 & Vac Alley Betw & Bergen's Repl Blk A-B & Vac Alley, Lots 8-11 & Subm Land, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43- 03, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43.04, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-05, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-06, Clovis C Lutz Sub Tract A-B, Subm Land, & 10 Ft Strip of Land Adj N of Tract A, Belvedere Apts Co-op Apt 2 A, Jones' Sub of Nicholson's Blk 2, part of Lots 1-2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-09098 9. Flamingo Bay of Clearwater, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 27 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 2.27 ft (to sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and boardwalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 45.67 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 5.5 ft for parapets (from roof deck) and with an additional 16 ft for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C (retaining 5 existing boat docks for sole use by the property owners); and (2) the Transfer of Development Rights for 2 units from 28 Idlewild St and 2 units from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1403 (TDR2005-09027). [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (27 condominiums)] at 170, 174, 180, & 188 Brightwater Dr, Bayside Sub No.2, Lots 36-40. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09101/TDR2005-09027 10. LaBella Vista of Clearwater, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 18 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 10.8 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk and dumpster staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to pavement and wall), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 7 ft (to pavement and wall), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and boardwalk) and increases to building ht from 35 ft to 45.67 (to roof deck) with an additional 5.5 ft for parapets (from roof deck) and with an additional 14.25 ft for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat docks for sole use by the property owners); and (2) the Transfer of Development Rights for 3 units from 200 Brightwater Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1403 (TDR2005-09026). (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [18 condominiums]) at 193, 199, & 201 Brightwater Dr, Bayside Sub No. 2, Lots 24 & 25, and part of Lots 23 & 26. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 09102/TDR2005-09026 11. Shaul & Meir Levy Partnership (C/O L&L Wings Inc.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval (FLS2003-09046) for redevelopment of an existing retail sales establishment and includes a reduction to front (south along Marianne St) setback from 25 ft to 10.75 ft (to building) and a reduction to front (south along Marianne St) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), per Sec 2-803.K. (Proposed Use: Remodel of existing Retail Sales Store) at 400 Poinsettia Ave, Barbour-Morrow Sub, Blk A, Lots 29-33 Incl. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-09096 12. Parkdale, LLC (Maria Nikolova & Belleair Harbor, LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to construct a 2 unit attached dwelling building in the Tourist Marina Residential District and includes a minimum lot area reduction from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a minimum lot width reduction from 100 ft to 60 ft, the rear, waterfront (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), and the rear, waterfront (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 2 unit attached dwelling) at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park, ls` Add Replat, Blk C, Lot 5 & Submerged Land E to Channel. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-10105 13. Magnolia Park Realty & BKB Properties Inc. are requesting a (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings in the Commercial and Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.17 and 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision. (Proposed Use: Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings.) at 907 S Ft. Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park, Blk 33, Lots 4, & 7-8, and part of lots 5 & 6, and Sec 16-29- 15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 07074/PLT2005-00027 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 12/04/05 /a7 11 J ?, ??? :!? 0707f FLD20Ak)7077 = 54 ACCETTA, JOHN J ACCETTA, ALLATHAI 11770 BARB CT LARGO FL 33778 - 3803 BELCHER, H STEVEN 1504 JAN ANN CT WASHINGTON IN 47501 - 3746 ALBRECHT, CHRISTIAN D ALBRECHT, CAROL F 112 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 CALVARY OPEN BIBLE CHURCH 11 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4419 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 CONNOLLY, MATTHEW J 120 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 DAMIANAKIS, ANTHONY R DAMIANAKIS, EKATERINI 111 MC MULLEN BOOTH RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEARW 331 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002 GRIZZLE, ANTHONY D 3101 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HUNT, CHRISTINE A 3136 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 BHAME, KATHY L 3142 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CHILDERS, CHERYL A PO BOX 730 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 0730 CLINE, EHREN M 3116 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401 CURRY, TONJA 116 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 D'AMICO, FRANK A JR D'AMICO, JOHONNA H 3100 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 FRANKICH, PETER N 3125 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HARBERSON, VICTOR G 3131 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 KACZOR, JERZY KACZOR, ALICJA 3112 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 u/ 4rJ OBAILEY, MONTIE R JR 3119 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 BLACK, BARRY J BLACK, NATALIE B 3141 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 CLARK, THOMAS B 3149 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 COLGAN, CATHERINE SEYLER, MARTHA J 3155 FEATHERSOUND CT' CLEARWATER FL 33759 - DABIRI, MASSOUD DABIRI, MALOUSE 3024 HAVERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4023 EZELL, WILLIAM J EZELL, DEBORAH A 3149 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 GOSNELL, JAN T 3118 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 HICKEY, PATRICK E HICKEY, TONI V 1775 SPLIT FORK DR OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2769 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 KLEINMAN, ERIC KOWBEL, GREGORY A MAI, NGA KLEINMAN, TERRI KOWBEL, WANDA J 3107 CHAMBLEE LN 3070 GRAND VIEW AVE 3107 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3445 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 I k MORA, ALBERT J LEI, SOI SAM 3115 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 NOLL, DAN L 3133 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 PFEIFFER, PAUL R 3141 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 REESE, DONNA L 1660 69TH AVE S ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 5923 SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER A 3133 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 SWEZEY, TIMOTHY 3137 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 NICKERSON, RONALD H 3124 AY BAY , LN L VONNE NICKERSON, DEBORAH H 3124 108 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 PASSARIS, ELEFTHERIOS PERFEITO, ANTHONY PASSARIS, MARIA PERFEITO, ANA 3106 CHAMBLEE LN 3137 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 PLEINES, HOWARD 3125 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 RAAB, DONNA R 3130 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 ROTELLA, THOMAS R ROTELLA, CYNTHIA L 124 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 SMITH, ERIC O SMITH, COLLEEN P 3131 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 THOMSON, MARION 3106 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 SALIM, THEODORE N SALIM, AMAL G 3113 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 SOFARELLI, ANDREA D 3137 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 TIZON, VELMA W TIZON, ALFREDO 3129 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 TULLY, JOE WALSH, EDWARD J WELCH, JERRY RAY TULLY, CYNTHIA L WALSH, LORRAINE E 3124 FEATHERWOOD CT 3148 FEATHERWOOD CT 3121 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (cont'd from 09-20-05) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 & 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7- 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. Alan Rophie, Ralph Rophie Cecila Betech & Cheryl Cohen (Rophie Family Partnership) are requesting Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 sq ft building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly St) setback to pavement from 25 ft to 11.39 ft, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) and to permit a 6-ft high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly St and east along Kilmer Ave), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), • • as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle Service Major) at 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 13.04. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-07075 3. Liberty Mirabel LLC (Raxit & Punit Shah, and Battle Creek Hospitality Inc) are requesting Flexible Development request to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 47 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 13 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.75 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and 10 ft (to pool), and a reduction in the lot width from 150 ft to 142 ft as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Secs 2-404.17 and 2-1602.C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 211 & 221 Skiff Pt, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A Lots 33 & 34. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-04036 4. Clearwater Centre LLC (Guy & Susan Bonneville, Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, & Anthony Dorner) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for ht (148 ft to roof deck where a maximum of 75 ft would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area), and to increase the building ht an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of .non-residential floor area)] at 1100 Cleveland St, Bassadena Blk A, Lots 1-14 incl part of Lot 15, and Bassadena Blk B Lots 9-11, and 14-25. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07067 5. Melodie A Ferguson Melodie A Ferguson Tre Rem, Robert M Pennock, Robert M Pennock II Tre Rem, and Paul & Tracey Kelley are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 65 ft (to roof deck), with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of 2 dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 665 & 667 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 6 & 7. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07078 6. Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Fort Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Fort Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 06053 • • 7. Thomas C & Dorothy J Jessup are requesting a Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) setback from 25 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 15.5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) from 25 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 11 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along N Keene Rd) from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along N Keene Rd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 9 ft (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Bicycle shop (retail sales and services) with parking] at 1770 Drew St, Woodmere Hts, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06054 8. Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 63.75 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Se_c_1629-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wi EyneA. Wells, AICP Planner III. (FLD2005-07077 9. Two to One LLC (T. Edward Entreken, V.P.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of retail sales and services (financial institution) as a primary use within the Office (O) District with a reduction to the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (financial institution) and office] at 1825 Sunset Point Rd, Pinellas Groves, Parts of Lots 7 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07079 s • 10. Hamilton Family Trust (Regatta Bay of Clearwater, LLC, Roland Rogers) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,280 sq ft, a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 60 ft, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 77 ft (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 condominiums)] at 862 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6, Unit C, Blk D, Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07080 11. Clearwater Retail Group LTD is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along S Missouri Ave) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 9.7 ft (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 52.25 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 ft for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (32 condominiums)] at 810 S Missouri Ave, Clearwater Retail, Lot 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07076 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Parry status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/02/05 FLD2005-07077, 55 ACCETTA, JOHN J ACCETTA, ALLATHAI 11770 BARB CT LARGO FL 33778 - 3803 BELCHER, H STEVEN 1504 JAN ANN CT WASHINGTON IN 47501 - 3746 CALVARY OPEN BIBLE CHURCH 11 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4419 * -- s ALBRECHT, CHRISTIAN D ALBRECHT, CAROL F 112 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 BHAME, KATHY L 3142 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CHILDERS, CHERYL A PO BOX 730 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 0730 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLINE, EHREN M Doug Williams, President 3116 BAY LN 2544 Frisco Drive CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401 Clearwater, FL 33761 CONNOLLY, MATTHEW J 120 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 CURRY, TONJA 116 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 DAMIANAKIS, ANTHONY R DAMIANAKIS, EKATERINI 111 MC MULLEN BOOTH RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - FIRST BAPT CHURCH OF CLEARWATE 331 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002 GRIZZLE, ANTHONY D 3101 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HICKEY, PATRICK E HICKEY, TONI V 1775 SPLIT FORK DR OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2769 D'AMICO, FRANK A JR D'AMICO, JOHONNA H 3100 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 FRANKICH, PETER N 3125 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HALIM, SIMAN B 3141 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 HUNT, CHRISTINE A 3136 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 Vtj Vj BAILEY, MONTIE RJR 3119 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 BLACK, BARRY J BLACK, NATALIE B 3141 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 CLARK, THOMAS B 3149 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 COLGAN, CATHERINE SEYLER, MARTHA J 41 ELLEN DR ROCKAWAY NJ 07866 - 1933 DABIRI, MASSOUD DABIRI, MALOUSE 3024 HAVERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4023 EZELL, WILLIAM J EZELL, DEBORAH A 3149 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 GOSNELL, JAN T 3118 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 HARBERSON, VICTOR G 3131 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 KACZOR, JERZY KACZOR, ALICJA 3112 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA KLEINMAN, ERIC KOWBEL, GREGORY A 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite KLEINMAN, TERRI KOWBEL, WANDA J 404 3070 GRAND VIEW AVE 3107 FEATHERWOOD CT Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3445 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 LAMOUREUX, ERNEST A LAMOUREUX, CHERYL D 3111 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 MURRAY, LA VONNE 3124 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401 PASSARIS, ELEFTHERIOS PASSARIS, MARIA 3106 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707 RAAB, DONNA R 3130 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33704 - 2227 SALIM, THEODORE N SALIM, AMAL G 3113 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 SOFARELLI, ANDREA D 3137 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 TIZON, VELMA W 3129 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 WELCH, KAY L 3124 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 *. MAI, NGA 3107 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 NICKERSON, RONALD H NICKERSON, DEBORAH H 108 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 PERFEITO, ANTHONY PERFEITO, ANA 3137 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455 REESE, DONNA L 1660 69TH AVE S ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER A 3133 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 SWEZEY, TIMOTHY 3137 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 TULLY, JOE TULLY, CYNTHIA L 3148 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 E MORA, ALBERT J LEI, SOI SAM 3115 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - NOLL, DAN L 3133 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 PLEINES, HOWARD 3125 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 ROTELLA, THOMAS R ROTELLA, CYNTHIA L 124 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 SMITH, ERIC O SMITH, COLLEEN P 3131 CHAMBLEE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708 THOMSON, MARION 3106 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 WALSH, EDWARD J WALSH, LORRAINE E 3121 BAY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 10/18/05 02:14 FAX I October 17, 2005 ' ATTENTION: Michael Dell Reference: i Property owned by Patrick & Toni Hickey ' 107 McMullen Booth Road Clearwater Fl. 37759 i -Dear Sir. Please be informed that 1 object to Mr. Hickey making any changes to property. When he purchased property he was aware of the zoning. AD boundaries to stay intact. The City of Clearwater allowed him to take out a large beauffW tree. The reason At the time) was to have parking in the rear of building. Did the city not know at the time the d septic sits right in the middle of the rear yard? We now have street lights coming into the back of our houses- Now parking will be in front, fewer trees in back as in original plans- He is commercial property and needs to respect the set backs as such. Thank you Manon Thomson 3106 Featherwood Coup Clearwater F7.33759 727-797-1022 cell 688-5313 l' i? ,I n F,= 19D- OCT 1 7 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Cln•. nE (?t.EARWATER E 201 October 14, 2005 To: Michael From: Johon: IN:RE: 1071 Dear Mr. D This Clearwater, pruporty or the current 1 Sincerely, Johonnna H: D'Amico Dr. Frank A. D'Amico, Jr. 3100 Featherwood Court Clearwater, Florida 33759 (727) 797-9423 D r OCT 14 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Cln' Oc CI_EARWATER and Frank D'Amico, Jr. Mullen Booth Road of the City of oard r is to inform the Community Development B ida that we object to Patrick E. and Toni V. Hickey using private is casemcnts and right of ways for a proposed doctor's office- We want daries kept intact. Thank you for your consideration. f I., r1 , 4TERI tt LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW r C ITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 March 22, 2006 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07077 - 107 McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On March 21, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 feet to 64.08 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 feet to 10.8 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to six feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 20 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 feet to 10.7 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to ten feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 feet to 7.1 feet (to existing building), from 12 feet to 9.7 feet (to pavement) and from 12 feet to 7.3 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR I311"I. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIIMEM13ER HOPI' HAMIFFON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PI?"1"ERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER M "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT" AND An'IRMATIvI? AC77ON EMPLOYER" March 22, 2006 Zayac - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That there be no plumbing in the conference room; 3. That there be no off-site parking within rights-of-way or on other private property, unless through a shared parking agreement acceptable to the Planning Department and recorded in the public records; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised acceptable to the Planning Department: a. increasing the amount of plant materials along the areas west of the building to provide "tiered" landscape effects (over the minimum landscape requirements); b. providing at least one additional tree specie; and c. providing the crape myrtle tree at least 2.5 inch caliper; 5. That the increased tree sizes (height and caliper) indicated on the landscape plan be installed; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised acceptable to Staff: a. providing wheel stops for the parking spaces; and b. relocating the proposed curb along the north side of the handicap access sidewalk to/from McMullen Booth Road to the south side of the sidewalk; 7. That the six-foot high solid vinyl fence along the south and east property lines indicated on the site plan be installed, with the height of the fence within the front setback reduced to a maximum of three feet; 8. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum six feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; and 9. That, prior to issuance of any permits, provide a copy of the approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County for the driveway expansion and a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (March 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. U P , I March 22, 2006 Zayac - Page 3 Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on April 4, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. You can access zoning information for. parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/dgpts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslMcMullen Booth 0107 Hickey Office Building #l2 (O) - ApprovedlMcMullen Booth 107 Development Order. doc I~o~~'-~~D7~ r ~ . ~ , "INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE" VICINITY MAP S ~ ~ xar s ~rlaox i5 ~ ~ wKmx~ F x~uuu MAWLRw eAr 3a d acres _ ~ 3 3 uaEmr wAw.u ~ d lAwdi ~ nYF 0.Wpll A'RIIE CUY F J B LdH nCE B CALL SUNSHINE 1-800-432-4770 uW xw~w ~ 0 FL. STATUTE 553.851 (1979) REQUIRES A xunsu, MIN. OF 2 DAYS AND MAX. OF 5 DAYS NOTICE BffORE YOU EXCAVATE. anus 3 sEtwi OWwOE PMT OY£ilA PIN ~ PROJECT @@@ ~x~ ti ~ VICINITY >ff . ~ a ~ nME ~ xmxww c O EA,AT,A wwm cxw.mlE Dune ~ h, DES xwmr vMM tAtll 1 N.T.S. TLLEA a 9 C 1. , INDEX COVER SHEET ~ DEMOLITION PLAN 2 SITE PLAN 3 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN 5 ~ o _ > > ,--LOCATION MAP,_T- pIF ~ o 9. tt'_~ I; ~t ( I€ is a-:F ~ f Gad - 10/ 0500 ~ Iuh~;Ci~ E~~~ _ J, a . ~ is I~ r f . ~ e- ~ ~~NCI~"r14s ~1~ s ~ ~uthE_I rdti_II~ A NOTE I ill j i~~l4a ~'~fF tl,. I ~a `~'a~,rlY~~~l,',.~ ~i ~P~l ~;z 9 1 3759 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. , ~~hn~F~rdp, ,,r,.,~.~e~ t. :1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i~l~f H I C, u~ ~7~ ~~~y _ O v v o ~ ~~,~j, N.T.5. i'r' PLAN APPRQII~D ~A~G ~ .~~a~r~ 7r Ll D SiON~'~UI~ G3~~~ Z LEGAL DESCRIPTION CVILENGINE~RING LANDSCAPEARChITECTUfZE P NN LA ING DING 7011?NTER PRISE ROAD` SU[TE 4Q4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SAFCIY HARDOR FLOR.[DA 34695 Be in at the NW corner of Section 16 Townshi 29 South 9 p ,Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Flonda, and run ° ° PHONE: 727.793.9888 thence S89 27 56 E along the section line a distance of 1338.09 feet, thence SO 3703 W along the 40 acre line a tli t n ° ~ FAX: 727.793.9855 s a ce of 266.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S89 2756 E, 230.00 feet; thence SO°3T "W 4. ~ ° ~ EMAIL KEITFI@KEITHZAYAC COM 03 , 6 00 feet, thence N89 27 56 W, 230.00 feet, thence NO 37 03 E along the 40 acre hne a ~ ~ distance of 64.00 feet to the POINT OF BE INN G ING, LESS the westerly 50.0 feet thereof for road nght of _ wa . Containin 0.264 net acres more or I y g ess o~ N ~ F~ ~p Ji '~0~ ~ ? I ~ ~ ~ I.lJ'. ~~I I~ , ,c.. , ~ P r-~~ ? ~ ~ ~ x ad ~ t~~ t.r th¢~riingpTiltla t~ s ~ r. ~'~~~R'~~, cEi ''SHE~'I';~° Agency App. /Permit No, Date Issued /Date Expires Tres ' ` ' - MTV /1C !AI [A~IIIA T[D ri nnnnr n-.n-.-i vll vl uLLMI\ YYf11Gf\ I'LULVVO-U/U// MAf' 13 ~Ofl6 SWFWMD KZA Pro} No.: 313-04 PINELLAS COUNTY R-O-W PLANNING DEPARTMENT Owner Pro} No.: NA CITY OF CLEARWATER Scale: SEE SHEETS Sheet No. PERMITTING SET ONLY (NOTFORCONSTRUCTION) 1 Of 5 ISSUE DATE: 03.10.06 '~~V I ~ v M.E.S. v v `ti v v TOP OF''BANK ~ ® o~ ~0~~, 1~, GRAPHIC SCALE Z ~0. 0 0' 0~ 0' _ 0 ~ ~ ~ INV.-29.27 0' 0~ 0• ~ 0 ~ 0, ~ INV.=27,72' ~ ~ 18' CMP rL ~ /q~~ o B 1 10 20 Z ~ ~ ~ `1i `b 0 rk ~ ~ ~ 8 PVC ~ ~ ti~ ~o ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ' _ _ (W FEET } ~ ~ 0• ~ ' `L 1 inch = 10 Pt. ~ ~ ~ 16 FIR ~ ~ Pf~ I ~ 9 79 y '~J V ~0, ~ M.E.S. ~`Lc~ P ~ . . 9 27 56 E 1338.09 , ~ ~ ~ l X ~°NW ti~~ ~ LEGEND ~ ~ INV.=28.34 `6 ~ ti~ ~ ~ ~ ti 1 ti ~ ~ ~ R „o~ o~ 0. CONC h, h o. ~ ~ i W 'S SEPTIC TANK 0 - `L - ( ) INK) ~,QHW ,~GI~~ ~ TREE TO BE REMOVED U = -29 16 0 0 0' STORM MH 0~ o G RIM=30.41 ~ ~ 6 PVC ~ INV.(S)=25,99' ~ z ~ ~ INV. N =25.84' 1 = w ~ UTILITY TO BE REMOVED ~ Q x UU O 0• ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ INV.(W)=26.00 ~ C 0' EXISTING 8 POTABL ~ 9 16 29 16 0~ Q 00000 210 0400 ~ CC~O~ ~ ® o ~ Q WATER MAIN ~ WEIR(W)=28.93 ~ C ~ ~0' 0 9~ ~ CONC ~ ~ PAVEMENT, CURBING, FENCING, & CRUSHED ~ z Anthon R. 8c Ekaterina Damlanakls i Y 0 A/c ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ s ~ ROCK, & SHELL TO BE REMOVED ~ ~ ,n YA/C PAD ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 0~ 0 ~ ~ 0 2 STORY 0. ~ ~ ~ m ~ 0, ~ I 'S ~ ~ ~ ~ C 0~ ~ 0~ ~ W z WOOD FRAME `b ~ 0~ ~ 0 ~ > o 0~ 0' ~ ~ _ F.F. - O 0 0 0 ,0~ o° EL-30.66 GI~~ PROJECT BOUNDARY z ~ o ~ ~G ~~n O ~ 1 ~ 0 - 0' ,1 ~ ~ 'L 0 • ~ ~ ~x CONC 8 n SILT FENCE ~ ° ~ ~ ~ w ~ 0~ ~ ~0. 0~ 0. O ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~J~ r> > '`j ~ ~0 ~ 0. ~ ~ N~~ N 8 0 ~ Oc ~ ~ ~ ~~j~~0~ ~ ~ fez ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 o ~ o~ o~ ~ ~ ~ WOOD ~ 0 ~ ~ GENERAL ~ > STAIRS 20.00' qg,, NOTES. ~ ~ ~~W ~1T, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ENVIRONMENTAL ~ T r~ Op 0 0 F g ~ 0 qNK 0 • U, ~ h0' ~ ~ ~ CON C ~ TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. ~ ~ 0. 0. - 0~ CONC 0' ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ N WOOD ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~6 O 1~ 0 SHELL 0~ 0~ 6' I`„ 6' WOOD d- N SHED o ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ FEI DRIVEWAY FENCE d- ~ ~ ~ 'y REMOVE EXIST. ~ . M. x ~ FIR 1 2 ~ ~ > z CONC. DRIVEWAY TYP. `J S89 27 5F S T PK & DISK ( ) X89°27'56"E 230.00'(D) ~N~R ~ o o BENT ~o 1 , E . = 32.22 ~ ~0 ~A~ w o - - ~ . 0. o ~ 50.00 D ~ ~ ~ 0 7 7f LB 3889 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 • ~ 0 ~ o~ ~ ~~0,22' (M) o~ - ~ a I o~ d o C1~ SA CUT 8c REMOVE EXIST. ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 WOOD CONC. DRIVEW - AY (TYP) FENCC 6, ~ SPHALT 0. N z ~ W T~~S ~ BROKEN ~ DRIVE o ~ ° 24.00 O 20H CONC. ~ o W ~ o OHW ~ ~ 2 ~3~~ ° o ~ ~ o O O 0' 0• . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 16~29~16~0000 r ~ O ~ ~ c~ ~j~' , Q ~ ~t 10.00 0~`~ Ernest A. ~ Cheryl ~ ~ - O ~a ~ F I O ~ o ~ i ~ ~ ~ 4 GIT~ ~ ~ o J ~ o ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ si ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q - 0 0~ ® ~ O ~ ~o ~ ~ z ~ ~0~ _ ~ ~.~i 21.G ' ~ ~ ~ 4 A ~ COVERED CONC ~ ~ T LL ~ ' O 1 ~ (SEPTIC 1 . ~ ALUMINUM . ~ 0. ~ CONC, ~ - (SEPTIOCN TANK) ~ ~~~~1 O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q STORM INLET ~ 1 0. HANDRAIL ~0. ~ RIM=30.56 2.5 TALL ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 1 STORI ~ `L 0~ 0' ~ \ ~ O ~ O `L try-- WM 0' ~ - I . N =26~ WM BLOC C ~ 0~ 1 ~ ( I BLDG. O ~ 1 0 ~ R~ ~ MPNo ~ ~ . ~ 01 ~ _ 0• 107 ~0. ~ 6 PUC INV.(W) 26.26 ~ ~ ~ U O 1 ~ SEE DETAIL 'A' yy FF=31.60 ~ ~ ~0. A 0 ~ 8 N ~ EXISTING SEP~ C ~ ~ o STING SEPTIC TANK >Bc20 ~ H ~ 8 o ~ 0. ~ o ~ RE VE S ~ICIENT SI ~ ALK 0 ~ ~ 0• CONC. DRAIN-FIE ~ ~ LD SIN-FIELD T01 ~EM~A~N - 0.18' ~ ~ ~ 0 I ST ~,L CORM SEWE PIPE ~ O A/C PAD 0 - ~ ~1 ~ ~ 0. z ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ '~1.~,00' ~ ~ o ~ ~ o~ 040 0' 0' ~ ~ .00 ~ ~ 55.81 woaQ w ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 83.97' / SHED ~ W ~ 9 0 ~ 1 ~ ~ 0' O ~ 0.00 D o~ o~ ~ ~ n v . `L o ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ . - . - ~ 0 ~ 0~ ' 0 g - 0 1 Z - - t;.i F ~ ~ 1 (1 V~ O' z 0• 0 7 99 y _ ~ Q U ~ I~ ~ Q~ 99 N 8 9 r 27 56 W 230.0 D z ~ w m FC~14X4 TEMPORARY SI PORARY SILT FENCE I E P A ~ ~ Q w z ~ ~ `ti 0 ~,TION PER CITY INDEX 607 0,~0, ~ a ~ W W ~ ~ o ~ ~S 2512 M, 0, 1 ~ ~ LO TION PER w Q ~ 0 6 W00 0' , 0~ 0 ~ 0 0. m D ~ 0 0 Q ~ ~ FENCE 'S ' j ~ ~ MATi~ilAl RIC ~ ~ ~ ~ WOOD ~ o ° Lot 1 ~ o FENCE NN w ~ 5 TALL y 0. ~ w Frank A. D Amico Jr. o o BLOCK WALL ~ ~ dot 2 / ~ Y Y Y W ~ F- ~ Johonna H. D Amlco i L Jerzy Alma aczo ,rf ~ ~ I ° Marion Thomson ~ o: o! ~ ~ W o i ~ ~ aa¢ ~ ~ ti ~0~ 0 ~1 t I! ~ 333 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' y-:~ FQR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH ¢ ¢ ¢ I" ' FlLTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ FEATHERWOOD B ATTACHED 10 A B-INCH (MAX) Z • ; • \ M~SH WIRE SCREEN WHICH HAS o 0 o p ~ ~ BACKFlLLED TRENCH BEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS PI t Book 105 Pa e 28 y g 00:0! ~ ~-ww U M ~ ~ SCREENED-IN 1 ~ ~ CONC POOL DECK 0• 0• ~ w a a. ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Nww p _~o: 0 N FlLTER FABRIC _O ~ FeshNm ocuTMaY ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES ~ ~ ~ POSTS OR IF USED o 0 o W L ~ O THE WIRE MESH N o o Q APPROXIMATELY 8 0 0 0 ~ V INCHES OF FlL1ER PLACE THE END 13 Y p FABRIC MAIERIAL a r Iz MUST EXTEND INTO POST OF THE ~ S~ a, ~r p A TRENCH AND BE SECOND FENCE ~ ~,p , Z I~ ~ 0 ~ z ANCHORED IHTH IPOS~CF TMEEND • ~ ' ~ BACKFILL~MATERIAL FlRST FENCE ~ w - N ~ ;b (l7~'.. I a' 0 o ~ w I> ~ WOOD OR ROTAIE BOTH + ^ ~ • . ~ ~ z STEEL POST POSTS AT LEAST ° 1. QJ r' ~ ~ ¢ ~ to 0 1B0 DECREES IN • ~ ~ !J 15' ° • ~¢'0 RUNOFF , - A CLOCKWISE _ ~ ~`m~'~ r DIRECTION TO y,~~ ~ 9 ~ CREME A 11GHT ti ` ' M } FABRIC MATERIAL ? ~ o ¢ i ~ '~0. 0' ~ ~ 0' o I 'S 1D INCHES DIREC110N OF RUNOFF WAIERS r~` e~!'` N a w U I (MIN) APPRO%IMATE + + ~ DRIVE BOTH i~ECE~~~~ ~~TI t4° ~~z ~ ~ 4-INCH BY _ POSTS ABOUT 10 ~ ~ 4-INCH TRENCH CROUNDI ANDTME N1~~ ~ ~ 7fj(~(; _ ~ ~ ~ W w " o ~ I T C 1-STORY BURY FLAP , roroe 1 t0 s U041 o rn W LLJ mmcr PLANNING DEPARTMENT w V) ONC BLOCK CITY OF CLEARVJATER W F. F. EL.=31.39 I CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA z x PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION o E ENGINEERING SHEET 00A~ Y INSTAWNG A FILTER >c 1-STORY Z~ I arcfanG BY A C S Moot rn~ir Ri nrI i ~e ~o RE"' DATE Knox APP, I°3 PERMITTING SET ONLY 2 OF 5 i (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) ISSUE DATE; 09.07.05 • ~ M.E.S. ~ :TOP OF BANK 0, O h o 0. 0. 0. ~ 0 ~ ~ o" ^~ow' ~ ~ u GRAPHIC SCALE z INV,=27.72 18 CMP ~L ~cU? 8" PVC° s 10 zD z ~0• ~ ti INV.=29.27 0~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ o ~ `ti _ ~ • ~ . (IN FEET) ~ ~ o g ti ' ~ 1 inch = 10 ft, `1' 16 FIR ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ p~ ~ 0 0 ti . 0 J o• ~°~W ~ LEGEND ~ ~ M.E.S. ~ 0 r x 9 27 56 E 1338.09 ~ . S INV,=28.34 ~0. ~ ~ `ti ~ `I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w ~ , o~ o~ CONC ~ R S ~ o• 0~ ~~o~ R ~ 0 ~ ~W ~ 'S (SEPTIC TANK) ~ ti ~ - -29-16 0 0~ STORM MH ~ 0' INK) ~j0~'~AON~ ,,Cf~~ ~ TREE TO BE REMOVED ~ ~ _ G ~ RIM=30.41' ~ ~ 6 PVC , s z l~ INV.(S)=25.99 1 ~1 x o ~ ~ UTILITY TO BE REMOVED INV.(N)=25.84 0~ `b a ~ ~ INV. W =26.00 O 0• h ( ) ~ 1 0~ C 0 h~ ® ~ / ~ Q EXISTING 8 POTABL ~ ~ 16 29 16 00000 210 0400 ~ ~ ~ Q WEIR W =28.93 0. C o' ~ PAVEMENT, CURBING, FENCING, & CRUSHED Q ~ CONC ~ ~ ROCK, & SHELL TO BE REMOVED ~ A O 0 WATER M IN ~ Anthon R. ~ Ekaterma Damlanakls ~ A/~ YA/C PAD U ~ ~ o, I y ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ o o~ 4 ~ w 2-STORY ~ ~ 0. ~ O ~ v ~ 0'C ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 'Q ~`m ~ 0 I ~ ~ 'S "J 'S 0, ~ 0~ ~ 0. ~ w z WOOD FRAME `b ,~0~ 0~ -~R ® PROJECT BOUNDARY ~ Z ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 0. O ~ F.F. EL=30.66 O 0 00 c~ 0• 1 v ~ ~ CONC 8 w o ~ ~ ~ ® SILT FENCE w ~ ~ o w O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ Z n0 ~~G ~ o~ gyp. o o~ ~ O ~ r ~ '`j n. ~ ~Q N~~ ~0 0 ~ ~ g ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ WOOD GENERAL NOTES. ~ ~ °~W ~ ~0' ~0. ~ 0 STAIRS 20.00' T CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ENVIRONMENTAL ~ OP 0 ~ 0 F B ~ cr ~0' ~ TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, ~ . 0 o qNK o~ ~ CO ~ ~ 0 ~ NC 0: CONC 0• ~ ~ - o ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 WOOD ~ O ~ ~ , O '1`~ SHELL ~0. 0~ 0• 6 6' WOOD ~ N SHED O 0 ~ ~ U~ ~0' ~ FE FENCE d- ~ - ~ ~ ~0 DRIVEWAY x REMOVE EXIST. .M. ~ FIR 1 2 ~ o i S89 27 5 X89°27'56"E 230.00' D PNOR ~ ~ Q = CONC. DRIVEWAY TYP. 0 ~ ) S T PK & DISK E ~0 ~ ~ ,I .~A~ w o o B ~T 1 ~ o~ E .=32.22 ~ ~ i ~ 13 FIR\` 5 ~g„' 20NW ~ ~ ~ 0~ i LB 3889 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 50.00 D ~ ~ o f n ~ 0~ ~ E 10.22' (M) ~oo~i - ~ ~ ~o°° ~ ~,o° 0 ~ ~ ~ SA CUT & REMOVE EXIST, 6 WOOD CONC. DRIVEWAY (TYP.) FENCE q, 6~ ~ N N \ S ~ BROKEN SPHALT ~ 0' _ z - ~ DRIVE o _ ~ - O ~ 24.00 ~ ~ W ~ o ONW 2 ~ o ~ ~ ~ -a~ ~ ~ ~ co ~ 16/29/16/0000 00 0~ o~ o ~ ~ 0,3 Ernest A. 8c Cheryl r ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ , Q ~ 10.00 ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ R , ~ o z ~ I N i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ _ a Q ~o. CONC ~a~~ -.I d ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ : 21.00 CON( • _ ~ 4' ALL ~ COVERED ~ ~ T ~ c~ (SEPTIC (SEPTIC TANK) y~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , O ~ ~ CONC. 0 . ~ ALUMINUM ~ ~ .STORM INLET 1 O• ~ ~ O ~ `L HANDRAIL ~ ~a 0 '1~ ~ '1'~ n ~ RIM=30.56 2.5 TALL 1 STORY ~ 0~ 0~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ O 0 0. - WM kW~Nf~' WM BLOCK F3LDG. ~ 0' ~ / ~ ~ ~ MPN~R ~ I .N-26.~ o ~'1 ~ 'I ~ © o' ~ r- 0~ „ ~ INV.(W)=26.26' ~0• - ~ /~1.). ~ ~ 6 PVC U. O , _ ~ ~ 0~ 2 q-" ~ A ~ ~ o ~ SEE DETAIL A FF-.1.60 N 0 0, ~ 8 5 EXISTING SEP (STING SEPTIC TANK ~8c2~ ~ ~ W ~ 8 ~ o• 5~ 0~ CONC. DRAIN-FIELD RE OVE S ~FICIENT Slfd~~ ALK 0~ 0• ~ 'AIN-FIELD T01 ~EMIA~N' ~ _ 0.18' o ~ ~ ~ O ~ A O I ST ~L CORM SEWE PIPE /C PAD 0 0 • z 'S gyp' . ~ ~ , ^4'40.00' 0' 0' ~ W ~ ~ WoaQ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 55.81 - .J 83.9' / SHED U W Q ~ ~ o~ ~ O I--I ~~o ~ 0,17' \ ~ o ~ ~ 0.00 D o~ o ~ ~ - - 0 ~ - ~ - w F ~ a U W ~ ~ ~ 0• z 0. ° , „ , ~ Q ~ N89 27 56 W 230.00 D ~ TEMPORARY w m FC1~4X4 ~PORARY SILT FENCE I F P 1 g Z ~ Q ~ ~ Z W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 LO TION PEF ~TION PER CITY INDEX 607 r'' Q ~ V FlLTE I FA RIC ~ ~ ~ z o ~ LS 2512 ~ ~ p ~ o ~ Q 6 WOOD o~ o' o• oti o ~0' ~ ~0' MAT~IAL ~ WOOD a m ~ ~ 0 > FENCE ~ Q w o dot 1 ~ ~ o ~ o ~ , ~ FENCE w ~ 5 TALL 0~ dot 3 Y w Frank A. D Amlco Jr, ~ , L..ot 2 o a Q BLOCK WALL / rig. ; I- ~ , Johonna N. D Amlco Marlon Thomson w ~ Jerzy A ~a ~acz0 I ~ ~ ~ I, ~ ~ s I o! o! o: o o~ w o. , ; ; .~i~ 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ o FOR ADDI110NAL STRENGTH . o ~ ~ -l flLTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN ~ ~ ~ B ATTACHED TD A 8-INCH (MAX) U u U Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ FEATHERWOOD \ M SH 'MRE SCREEN WHICH HAS o0o O i~// BACKFlLLED TRENCH B N FASTENED TO 1HE POSTS ~ ~ PI t Book 105 Pa e 28 g ~ SCREENED-IN ~n.a U (n o ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ CONC POOL DECK ~ w w p ~ o: o: o~ 0~ ~ 'S 0' ~ ~ 0 0 N FlUER FABRIC MATERIAL SECURELY ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES o 0 o W FASTENED TO THE PD515 OR IF USED 1HE WIRE MESH N o o Q O_ ~ L ~ o00 ~ ~ ~ -----------I APPROXIMATELY 8 ®RIGINAt" I FABREC MATE IAL PLACE THE END RECEIVEp ~ N ~ O MUST EXTEND INTO POST OF 1HE Z A TRENCH AND BE SECOND FENCE Z INSIDE THE END 1 ~ ANCHORED (NTH POST OF 1HE 1 U o: w > - In - O z w IQ COMPACIID FlRST FENCE BACKFlLL MATERIAL 3 ~ ~ 0 ~ I~~ 0 wooD oA ROTATE eoTH pIANNIN~ DEI'AI~TME~dT C~! ~ o ~ IW > 'S STEEL POST POSTS AT LEAST ~ ~ ~ Q p _ 180 DEGREES IN CITY OF CLE~'.12V'JATEi~ to i RUNOFF , / A CLOCKNISE ~~''11m~~T m o ""~-y" DIRECTION TO ~s ~ Q o ~ CREATE A TIGHT ~ 'CJ''i I ' SEAL WITH THE ` v- ~ _ v . • t r~ ~ ~ } FABRIC MATERIAL o' ~ 1 ' ~ w 10 INCNES DIAEC110N OF RUNOFF WATERS 4 ~ ~,.4 ~ ~ :i ~ ~ (MIN) //~\I~~ APPROXIMATE + + + °RI4E BOTH , ~1J ~ N S-' ~ i~j yi + r: ;t~! ,%I z I ~ \ \ 4-INCH BY _ PO5T5 ABDUT 10 n. 9 ~~.y 4Ld~ • ~ h ~ W w 4-INCH TRENCH RNCRV FlIePO THE o ~ ~ 'r ~ E2 ~ GROUND AND • ..Y ~ . ~ ~~r . ~ ~ o o 1-STORY T ~~A Ap„~l ~W~ CONC BLOCK U ~ 11 2 ( i~ 00 - F. F. EL.-31.39 CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEER--- L 00 DOW INISTRATION - 0OWmy' INSTAWNG A FILTER a SHEET 1-STORY CHEC D W C S rnm(r Ri nril i ASV. DAN DEM"ON1 AM. 3 PERMITTING SET ONLY 2 OF 5 ~e ~o (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) ISSUE QATF; 09.07.05 1 Z VARIES Z z NORMALLY 48' „ 1 4 FT. MIN. EXPANSION JOINT C I / / MAXIMUM 50' CAL F RE HYDRANT SETT NG GRAPxic sc~E ~ /''EXPANSION JOINT STRUCK JOINT EXPANSION JOINT 'Dr ° ' o'D ° o rD ° o,p ° n.t.s. 10 0 5 10 20 , r~ / ,0'p ,0, o, o D, ° 0 D, o ,0 p o o p o o ~ ° C D ° ~ °p, ° .o oDl ° ,orD o ~o'D rO D. gyp, c ~ ~ 3 µ--~I ~ ( 1N FEET) ~ U • ~ "CONCRETE 51DEWALK ~ 4 1 inch = 10 tt, ~ ~ (PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE, CLASS 1 W/ FIBERMESH) Back of Curb Max. 15' -Min. 4' or Edge of Pavement ~ U ` 18" Min. L SIDEWALK TO BE MINIMUM 4 THICK CONCRETE, (6 MINIMUM AT DRIVEWAYS) 24" Max, PLAN EQUAL TO SIDEWALK 2, SIDEWALK TO HAVE 1/2" RADIUS TOOLED EDGES. Distance TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH (s' MAXIMUM) Distance Varies Valve Box ~ O Q 3, CONTRACTION JOINTS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 1/2" AND AT INTERVALS SPECIFIED BY FOOT, f LEGEND ~ 4, EXPANSION JOINTS ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN SIDEWALKS AND CURBING, DRIVEWAYS AND ALL ~ 1/2" BITUMINOUS STRIP FIXED OBJECTS AND A T INTERVALS SPECIFIED BY FOOT. , ~ u ~--BROOM FINISH i•''''r,';~'.:~~•;•' ;:::',;i.,; ~ 0 CONTINUOUS 1 2° X 6" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION ~Q w,•r,;.,,; ~ 5. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL CONSIST F / ~ STRIP. TYP TYPICAL ~ Z • •~.~-dr.1, U CROSS SLOPE 1 4 TO 1 0 MAXIMUM 1 2 TO 1 0 , OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ~ '.;;,;.;;;;;w~.,, 6. MINIM M / / ~ ' ~ ~ " ' ~ ENGINEER. I I U o I ` 30.8 PROPOSED GRADE ~ a, ~ u S UCK JOINT 1. AREA UNDER PROPOSED SIDEWALKS TO BE COMPACTED PER FOOT STANDARD N iv I Mech. Joint Valve ~ ~ Q < , EXPANSION JOINT STRUCK JOINT TR SPECIFICATIONS 128-9.2 ONLY APPROVED Z ~ p 8, DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. • EXISTING GRADE a ~ a Kennedy Guardian No. K-81 A i , , Q 0 ~ ~ 9, SIDEWALK TO HAVE BROOM FINISH. I Muller Centurion No. A-423 ~ I!J 0 ~ ~ n I U.S. Pipe Metropolitan ~ ~ ~ o` o~~, ~ NOTES: 10. CONCRETE SHALL BE CURED PER FOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE PROPOSED INLET TOP ~ Z ~ ~ ~ s 1. SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE TOOLED EDGES. CONSTRUCTION, SECTION 520-8 NOTES: Restraining Joint (Typ.) ~ Z ¢ n w 2, CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT STRUCK JOINTS OR EXPANSION JOINTS ONLY. JO TS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN AND ALONG EDGE ABUTTING CURB, 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. 3. EXPANSION IN ace Street. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLOemA SILT FENCE ~ ~ z ~ ~ 5 1 /4" Valve Seat. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION -~~V v V-' 1, I ~ z CONTINUOUS 1 2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION STRIP, AS SHOWN. 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4" Valve S 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL CONSIST OF / 3, Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street aced at Street Corners ENGINEEAINO ~j ~ or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lit it to Side Lot Lines p~' TYPICAL HYDRANT a~ 15 92 ~ U o ~ ~ ~ W SETTING Whenever Possible. 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & FI Connections & Fittings, pEy, ~ ~ ~ CROSS-SEC110N i.C J. L E T N R E N I K E ID L NTS ~ D I T , R L .L I W r 1 Lr_ S ~ 4' I'`1 ~ ~ - ~ 1 ~ ~ f C 1 r tk r~ ~ ~ C~'.i,.a JPJ.~ ~ P~ 1.1C~L , ~ ~ 1 ~ , , U ~ Q ~ I ~ , PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES: ~ x Q _ ~ ~ f, ~ . ~ ~ ( W ~ F,,; ~ t _ ~ I '"t~ - ~ I ~ M ~ 1. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET AND DEMOLITION FOR EROSION AND SILTATION ~ w a CONTROL ALONG WITH GENERAL NOTES, ~ ~ w II X, 1 G~ ~ U ~ 1 i ~ ~ , ~ ~ti'? 'ti r 2, SEE SITE PLAN/HORIZONTAL CONTROL SHEET FOR SITE DATA. ~ ~ a 3, SEE BOUNDARY ~ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR TEMPORARY BENCH Lt ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ „ ~ - '4 MARK (TBM) LOCATIONS. o ~ 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED _ / 1 ~ .t_L_,L.. IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANUAL _ I ' 1 ~ _ rr r1 ~ II i- PREPARED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS. .;r • t"-' GNU r~ i1~,'~j ~ ~ ~k'' C C. I i I 1 I I'~ ~ ~ r~, ~ . _ - ~ ~ l i ~ ,ti~~ ~ r, . 5. ACCORDING TO F.I.R.M COMMUNITY PANEL # 12103C0129G r ~I, <~,J T~• . • M' 'JVQUD ~ SHED °;J - THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE "X" (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE ~ OUTSIDE 500-YR FLOOD PLAIN) fi t;,~? ~ ~ } ~ ; - FE Pal CE fi ~_c~~~ DRItiEb~~l ~ r1 79 I ~ 97 . y ~ 6, ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH IN R-O-W SHALL BE SODDED. ~p t n I ~ Px ~ ~ FIR 1 ~ ~ I .~t::~~9 ~ ; ~r~ E ;.~~~.UU (C1 ~l0' ~ D) ' ~A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ DI.,~. Ertl T ~ I . ~ b r , , - , - G ~ v~-~-®---.~ L_E EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE. Q ~ - - ST. Q ~ MATCH E, I ~ I ~ ~ _ t . ~ , 1 - ~ ~ _ ~ REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT PAV M-ENT ~ _ 'tjC''' ° ~LO i ~~0~ / ^~~~---~'l ~ ' CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE TO INSTALL OR PROPERLY MAINTAIN THESE ~ ~ [~-I ~ ~ ~ ,~,uH1J ~ BARRICADES WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE W ~ ~ o , C0~ R L EX INLET _ ` ~ CITATIONS, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTERS 40D-4 AND 40D-40, F.A.C. H N E = 27.0 a• . , _ ~ . ~ ,~US ~ o„ INITIATION OF CIVIL PENALTY PROCEDURES PURSUANT TO SECTION IU-I 1~ \ 373,129, F.A.C., CAN RESULT IN A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED `10,000 ~rI Q'-I . _ _ - 'T /31 ~ F~,~ i10 PER OFFENSE WITH EACH DATE DURING WHICH SUCH VIOLATION OCCURS FBI W e I MATCH`'EXISTING .p' ~ ~;4,`~.fd . L~ p . d l / ~ CONSTITUTING A SEPARATE OFFENSE. ~ . q , I P, n . d' , X1.6, ~ . ~ d' . ..d < dr. , k a'.'.' , ° . . a Y. UTILITY NOTES w ~ ~ ,p. \ ~ 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ~i ~ ~ pp ~ ~ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINER ~ W ~ (1) 6 x ~~1~1G'; ~L~~1I ~ 4 c a : a: a i ~ i d E ea e< ..d / C~ Tr` ~1 FROM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS. ~ ~ ~ 8c V~L , J ' ~.d d' ~ d 1 9~. ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 2. HICKEY OFFICE BUILDING WILL BE UTILIZING THE EXISTING SEPTIC TANK F ~ . i ' a yy r~n~j\ AND DRAIN-FIELD FOR SOLID WASTE. ~ ~ w ~ X1.00 S G CONC. SEPTIC TANK 9 ~ ~ . , _ ~ r. ' ; a L , , TING BLD 31.00 , ° 5 ~ • ~ `'1 Vim, 'e a. . f~ , ~ D ° : ° ~ & DRAIN FIELD TO REMAIN C TANK '~~~;~I Z ° ~ :MAIN v ~ t ~ ~ Z ~I. . 1 ~ . J ~~I' ~ ~f~,° °opnoi'~~P~°oac "I° V.~ 0 ~E,~ -~t:-~ ~ n 1 1 ~ ~ EXIST:FFE=.31...60 ~ ~ y ~ 3. HICKEY OFFICE COMPLEX WILL BE UTILIZING THE EXISTING WATER MAIN AND ~ w ~ i .1 e..,r 1. ';f 1. ~ ~ °°o v ` x d ' • 1 o D ° LO° ° , ~ ° . ~ ~ . ° ,°°o, , / ~ ~ / SERVICE FOR POTABLE WATER SERVICE. o o w . °~~`~D 0 r ~ 93 F \ ~ a ~~~I~~GII.. o°~°D°o°'y° Y~~ I d. ~.~~I Jd~1b~'. ~ ~ f~~ 1 ' 9, a~. \ ` _ ~ ~ 4. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL UTILITY NOTES. ~ ~ ~ P~'. ~ ~ ° 1 C . a' ~ :.e. it ~ J i II } ~1~ N N N N r ' ~ ~ ~q B _ ~ ~r y ~ V d„}9 ~~~1 G_' . VIII) - J,~~..:7a~ ~ 7 IJ ' 5, INFORMATION DEPICTED REGARDING EXISTING UTILITIES IS Y Y Y Y m ' ~ ~ p t.~ / APPROXIMATE AND IS NOT FIELD VERIFIED. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR WILL FIELD LOCATE 8c VERIFY i / 1 f I . ~ ~ EXISTING UTILITIES e.g. TYPE OF UTILITY, INVERT, CONDUIT MATERIAL ~ ~ ~ _ 1; 3Q,5:~ ~~1.~ii~~l - ECT. AND CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ~ 3 3 (F „,T. ..i~ ,MV ~i AND/OR CONFLICTS. ' ~~~o U U U U z FIRE HY RANT 1~LF h 2 PVC I 31.00 / O O O W ~ LOCATION 29.5 t , a,,. ' ~,1,, t Ci i ~ , ~ -ti. ~ .c ~ ~ TYP CAL HYDRANT SETTING ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ o U~~ ~ C~'v o ~ ~ ~ ~ r > n.t.s. ~ a a Ul 1, , - - . _ ~ , w _ u~iWW p i ~ ~ " - o: a: r~ - ~ 2- ; - , , TEMPORARY SILT FENCE S ~ ~ ~ _ _ ; ~ ~ LO~~ATION PER CITY INDEX 607 so7 I ~A 0000 w (4) 6 ~ Connecting Piece w/integrally O Fire Hydrant Assembly ~ ~ ~ o F- J,~'i' cast Mech. Joint Gland on (Typ•) ~ ~ ~ ri Q ICI CI 'i ~ r ~i ix~ one End-D.L Rotatable Mech. ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Joint Gland on Other End. ORIGINAL ~I L_L L_ o ~ ~ t 1 4 o O , _ 'i"i I _ , GRATE/SKIMMER TOP ~r' - ~ ~ A~~ ~ ELEV=30,5 LSeetNoterl1 s RECEIVED ~ " Z ~U-F ~ ( ) L~_ r_~ ~ Fr,_~ril,. A. G AmirC~, Jr. 3._4.. LL qf I/ WEIR C; L~L_tJ~,h tr~~r',LL_ 2~-3~0 ELEV=30,1 (it'at8 - - ~ I~~( I~. ~ ~ ~ Valve and H dram Tee MAR 13 2006 E- ONTROL T UCTUR e ~'.r ~ ~ o- I,, 'r IR ~ Jo ~I o n n a I- . ~~a,-1 r7i I C it r i I~ ~ l~f~~l C1I~ I ~ ~ of ~ ~ FIBSK~MMER 2" CI. Eye Bolt 00 J~r~ ~r y _ _ ~ w/D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint ~ Mech. Joins tv~ ° ~,!_a z > MOD1~I=1ED TYPE INLE 2 11.11 2 FIBERGLASS o C) ~ „ See Index 201 SKIMMER P I° Gland on Plain End Branch. valve PLANNING DEPARTMENT o,a"` 4: , ~f~ ao t G ~ w~ ~ IaJ ATE EV=30. ~ N ~ • 2 ~ SKIMMER BOTTOM ~ 2 D 4 ~ " c.~ CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~ m y1 0 O j I r~,~t~) i - Nc ELEV=29.5 I' TYP. 1z" PVC o F_. . WEIR 1E EV-30,1 _ ~ o o N l e` ~,a ~ ~ lJi A f ~ r,°; T,,_I ' I~J-~%~ Er EV=27 ~ ~ ~ °o °o ,4- er ~ _ ,,;r-. N ~ i I e~r,~C~a ~O I l1 'l. J C m m O O ai I,U ~ s ~ v l ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~4~ z~ yaw 12' PVC I ~~o ,12' PyCPVC Water Main ~ 1 ' ~a• •~~`iww o I ~ o o SE TI rohrT o o , : ~ ; rn rvnr n I Tvnr `;t"',E,.(L P,Ir-(1-If•~I NOTES r!. % ~ o s A CJ ~ p 2-4 DECK PLAN 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout ? I_ a Straight Bars 2 x 16 (U !I I , f 0( Recomr{ieilded Maxmur -Pipe Size: ` NOTES Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained > w i Reticuline Bars x „ 'D d u e L Fasten its w/ lead stainless H a j -0 Wall ~.8 pipe steel > x i steel el bolts w/ lead anchors Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). jCITY"UC DF cLEARWATER, FLORIDA 9 1 W WORKS ARI INISTRATION °zL 3-1 Wall 24 Pipe 2. Sed all edges of skimmer at Approx. Weight 100 Lbs. contact paints with structure with TYPICAL HYDRANT 9115 92 CEacmSETTING SHEET FDOT TYPE rrCn MODIFIED CONTROL ST UCTURE waterproof caulking or approved equal PLAN VIEW r". o~rz o nay Mr. ° er 3 O0 4 o E Z N.T.S. PERMITTING SET ONLY 4 OF 5 Z~ (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) ~o ISSUE DATE; 03.10.06 SPREAD Z Z ~ a~r~ SPREAD NOTES: ~ Z a 1. ALL WODD SHALL BE SPRUCE OR PINE-NOT PRESSURE TREATED. a U ~ 2. CROSS TIES SHALL NOT CROSS OVER WOODY ROOTS. x°~`"~'~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ SPREAD Cj 3, REMDUE ALL STRING &/OR WIRE WRAPPED AROUND TRUNK. ~ ~ ~ 20 0 ~o zo ~o `n^ a 4, REMOVE ALL STRAPS, ROPES, WIRE, &/OR STRINGS USED TO LIFT THE ROOTBALL, nv a ti a 5, REMOVE ALL BURLAP &/OR WIRE FROM THE TOP Of THE RODT BALL a ~ vJ ~ ~ a ' ~ SCI -''~m'~, 6, TOP OF ROOTBALL TD BE SEf 2" BELOW FINISH SURROUNDING FINISH GRADE as (ix FEET) ~ I~- ' - a a ~ ~ ~ as . ~ ~ ,I~ ~ a~ a 4a ~ 4 saa~' a 1 inch = 20 ft. I ~ ~ as a 'Q ~ HEIGHT ~ as l a ~ ~ acs ~ a U as HEIGHT ~ ~ ~ a 4 MULCH 3" FROM STEMS MULCH 3° FROM TRUNK O MULCH 3" DEPTH GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES Q TILLED AND LOOSENED ~ U 3" MULCH LAYER NATNE SDIL EACKFILL ~ Q ' 2"X2"%4' STAKE 2'k2'x4' CROSS MEMBER - FERTIUtER rARLETS 1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote optimum ~ \ \ \ `a,:"~ ~",Y ;<;;wi~" \ 2/3 OF THE AS SPECIFlED. PLACE lant rowth. UNIFORMLY AROUND P 9 / / ~~.'<;;~~~k:, ;~s-~,~.r~~~~s \ V A/VA/VA DRIP LINE - 'UT's -.i • . / 2z2 VERTICAL FERTILIZER TABLETS AS ,,~;",,~~=:,.w. .;~.rx>~''.<"' WOOD STAKES ~hwl ` I' ROOT MASS BETWEEN U -r ~ r ~ Is MIDDLE AND eoiroM 2. All recommended trees and lant materials will be raded as Nurser Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida T SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY ; R,,, a;~ \ 6 , ~ ,,,.R~w,^,;. / / / PREPARED PLANTING SOIL OF ROOT MASS. P 9 y ~ ~ J Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants", ~ ~ Q AROUND ROOT MASS ~ 1x4 HORIZONTAL CROSS \ \ \ \ /\/\y\/\ ~ WOOD MEMBER OF 2"%2"X4' CROSS MEMBER 18"MIN, ROOTeALI BETWEEN MIDDLE AND / APPROVED SUBSTITUTE uNDlsTUeaeD solL 7th Edition, 1998 as revised from time to time, Z G r BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS / / / / TILLED AND LOOSENED - - - 2-2"X4" STAKE W/ p LONG TAPER MIN. IB , ~ t 0 ca ~ - ~ - NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL - - - EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL _.ro soil uNDlsruRaED 3. All planting shall be done in accordance with the Florida Nurserymen s and Growers Associations approved practices. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 TO 5 11MES WIDTH 4. All plants shall be fertilized with Agrifarm 20-10-5 tablets as per the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with ~ z 0 ~ ' OF ROOTBALL 2-2.5"DRYWALL SCREWS y/ 2°X2"R4' STAKE 3 TO 5 TIMES THE WIDTH BARRICADE DETAIL of THE RooTBALL note # 5. I z SHRUB 8c GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL f-' ~ ~ ~ ~ N.LS, N.T.s, TREE PLANTING DETAIL 5. The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows; 50% sand and 50% organic material consisting of ~ --I ~ ~ ~ native peat, well-decomposed sawdust, leaf mold and top soil. It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly mixed c~ Q ~ ~ ~ N.T.S. medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water-holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, ~ U ~ w u such as roots, stones, weeds, etc. 6. All planting areas shall receive a 3" layer of recycled hardwood log mulch, which is to be watered-in after installation. ~v _ -'~`r~ r~ Q' ' 'r. " ALL SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVE Q - ,l~` `~T;~~ TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACIP PLANT LIST ~ IRUBS/GROUNDCGVER 7. The plant material schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy TRIANGULAR SPACING. between the plan and the plant key, the pion shall prevail. ar~~ ~i~t". SEE PLANT LIST FOR O.C. U' .ANT LIST FOR (a.C.) SPACING. ~ 8. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications, Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed ~ t 11 UP Ulmus Parviflora, Drake Elm, 4" CAL. 12' HT. ` ~ ) and replaced at the contractor's expense. ~ ~ ' d'ca re e M rile 10' HT. MULTI-TRUNK ~ -t~`~. - 1 LI La erstroemla In I , C <,4 , 9 P Y ~ ) _ Q 140 VS Viburnum Sus ensum, Santlankwa Viburnum, 3 GAL. (2' HT.) 36" O.C. `r ' ~ ~ ` ~ ' . ` 9. All tree and shrub locations are subject to change. All locations shall be approved by the City ~ ~ -~;z r , , ; : prior to planting. U ~ Q _;t, ( ~ . 'ti 10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both the site and the bid documents, Discrepancies ~ w O Jr r in the documents or the actual site conditions shall be reported to the City Project Manager ~ ~ w `~I" , , ~ I " ~ ~ r; , '1 18" MIN, SETBACK FOR SH r,- & GROUNDCOVERS in writing at the time of bidding or discovery. No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report ~ SETBACK FOR SHRUBS SUCK condition, or for errors on the art of the Landsca e Contractor at the time of biddin ~ ~ UNDCGVERS p p g. ~ ~ 11. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to perform a ~ v~ O.C. SPACING the work set forth in this plan set and the specifications. ~ - ~ I1'J t.. ~ I'~I ,1- ~ Ca`t J r ~ ~~EJ BACK OF CURB/ ; O of cuRe/ „ 12. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the Landscape Architect , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ BED 111NE ~I~IL- ~ ~ l~l~.~,.~ I ~ INE ~ will be notified by in writing of intended changes. PC T~EIr ~ ~ II''°lv.~~Nl--~6.~u 1 ~ c~'~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ c~~ 1 ~ PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) ,r~ I O i I ,1~ r~ ~ 13. Any and all questions concerning the plan set and/or specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect 9, ~ ~ ~ n ~=`~1,LJ N.T.S, at (727) 793-9888 t1 ' ~ ~ ~ - I I`, 14. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the owner. `T~ 15. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final ~ 1 -r= F, F. EL-30,6' ~ ~ _ c>, acceptance by the owner. ~ O 16. All dimensions to be field-checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material installation. Discrepancies shall ~ (1` rv. v. ' ; n; U ,t , be reported immediately to the owner. ~ ~1 1,~•...~'~, 17. All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan. If materials or labor do not adhere to specifications, they will a be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. X l IBS ~ ~N~ i0D X. ~ 51~P,.I , r _ _ 18. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications, v Q I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 19. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs. Q i ~ U. A I~. ~ i ; i CON C . I~ ' r v, CC)~v1G ,1..~ ~ ~Q Q 20. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new plantings, ~ J W o M 132 I~~~~t~D - « ~ ~ . cv 21. Any existing areas that are disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded to ~ W ~ ~ ~ N SHLD - match existing. SHELL v- _ ~ 22. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, removal, and proper disposal of any and all debris ~ W ~ ) F. , ~ C ~ ~ 1 i A R generated during the installation of this project. ~ - ~ I ~ I ) ~ _ ~ I__ _ L. ~ ~ ~ ~,PN° C G t - a r si r 3>> GA 23. All areas disturbed within right of way shall be sodded. W _ - , _ - - -t~, ~~1_~~. FIR~~ 5 j'n" ~ _ , ,L`J . ~ J. ~B .1~03`.~ U W 'I ~ 1 ~ I M- I . 4 'Y ,x. ' n, t .tea r ~ Goa i IRRIGATION NOTES ~ Z ~ ~ o U7 ( r~ . ' 4 ...a ; . _ c~ I / 1. A law volume irrigation system, that provides 100% coverage to all proposed plantings, .a ~ ' a a 4 . n~-I' ~ ~ e~ will be designed and installed by the Contractor to meet city code Division 12 Sect. 3-1202.C Z o C ~ - - - - - - d ~ = o h ~ z UP 2. The proposed Irrigation System must meet or exceed all applicable City code W ~ w , . d L~OH w t~ requirements. (i.e., Back Flow Prevention, Automatic Rain Shutoff Device, etc,..) o o w :t l 7 .A, .~1 ~ .4~ ~ I`mo'^` ~ L.L ~ I' T(~. I:. 41 ` ° `a : l1 ~r: r 4.r a ~ „d-s'- Q Q ~ ~AND~CA .9 .A r w 3. Irrigation shop drawings must be submitted and approved by the City prior to the . . Bll E 4 I~ 4 d ~ ~ ~ ~ R 7- -o ~ development order . N r, r, (uwww 4. Irrigation system must be inspected and accepted by City Project Manager Y Y y Y m / e~ 4 4 a~ 4 w i @xe . ~ ~ " prior to installation of mulch. Irrigation must meet citie code section 3-1203.C a ~ / • .J ~.y. L~ ' . I d a , 4'. f . a ~ 4 ' P' P. 'i ~ to provide 100% coverage, and include a rain sensor and timer. ~ ~ ~ t~,P'Y a, :q :4 P ~ Y dl -v3' C11~ 5. Irrigation as-built drawings, which accurately and clearly identify all modifications ~ ~ 1 ,J ~ ~ a i ' G~e 4 4 4 i. &/or substitutions, must be submitted prior to final inspection and acceptance. ' .'4 ' I`' I 4 ~ , t)_4` 4 ~~wm '1,,,. r a ' EXISTING BLD EXISTING CONCP SEPTIC TANK ~ 4 , 1, .,sa°~ ~ . .:4 , p c~, & DRAIN-FIELD TO REMAIN 1 6. The Landscape Contractor must coordinate the placement and power supply for the ~ " ~ ~ Z l irrigation control timer with the General Contractor. 0 0 o w O _ , ~ :o d EXIST FFE-31. ~ / a "~~~-~oo° ~ 4 ~ 60 ~ /I 7. The following irrigation system components will be utilized, per each manufacturers' ~ ~ ~ w a ° _ ~ ~ ~ o. o~rl ..t.~. ~4. ~.~'C><} P YY~I~, I e.^~ { 'I~~ rA ~ ti') r w ^,I~V ~ ~ specifications. ° w w ~ ~ ! ~ 4' w a a ~ Taro-Netafim TechLine Self Cleaning, Pressure-Compensating Emitter Line ~ w w o ~°1. t^ ~ ~ v ~ _ r. 4 yJ' ~ ) W I 111 7~ \,v/ ~~a~" 4' ~,P ~ LJ~ v'~ 1 HARDIE - Raindial 6 Station Outdoor Control Timer ~ ~ - ~.I.D, :4 4 . p,4 n•1 LANDSCAPE O ,I,,., 4 9 e o , , 7a r"~ ~ BUFFER ~ Richdale - 214APR 1" Electric Valve i a Amtec - 10" Round Valve Box. o 0 0 o w ~ l~~1 ~ ~ .a ,'-j^~ ~ I-~I , ~ w --I N O O ~ Q . ~ W Oi M O O O O \ ' _ J ~1 ~ ~ N M d~ O ~ : ~ ~ i rn ll~ KW~-f/1-OZ(/1 3 0 - . v. 'o s l I „ ' \ C7 Z x - r . F. / ~ ~ ~ _ h I 1. W~ la m ~ - , I ` ~ ` - - TREES TO BE REMOVED = 37" TOTAL ORIGINAL e, ' oady.. ; _ F ~ RECEIVED 0 .~P W ti , o ~ Y I ro LL1 I t~ ~~1~~ u1.. ~ I~ c~ p~ 1 ~J 9 C W ~i s W z . _ q 6 6 0~ n t"1~~ 1 J L~DU iil ~Gfa w c~ ,~Z - ~ ~n~ ~ vii ~J ~ PLANNWG DEPARTMENT ! ~n y`',xO' ~ ~ W t CITY OF CLEARWATER f 8 ; -t _ Y TALL 16 HIGH VINYL FENCE UP Frank A. D Ar-nico, Jr. M ? c_>l Lc t EUD"C : WALL 'ca 5 Joh _nno H. C . ,r~ i ic_~ I\.Ion iun Thoi~.~ ~i~ Koczi~rSHEET ~Z o rn ' z c PERMITTING SET ONLY 5 OF 5 ~i ~ (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) ISSUE DATE: 03.10.06 REVISIONS BY EXISTING; WINDOWS TO BE DIVIDED INTO NEW 1'4"xEXISTING HGT. GLASS BLOCK WINDOWS - - EXISTING COLUMN - - - - a % e o TO REMAIN EXISTING E.Q. E.Q. 10'-7' p F-- EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING f BEDROOM k CONFERENG z~ ~ RED I BEDROOM PATIO COVE II,~ PATIO I I'I I III i I X ~ OFFICE OFFICE ROOM ~ w EXISTING TO STING TO ~ O ~ REMAIN :MAIN i ~ V- x i o ~ ~ L _ _ - - 00 00 ~ 1'-0" ~ EXISTING ELECTRICAL - - - - 1 I- ~ r - - - - - - > I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PANEL TO BE RELOCATED I ~ I I I III x x x ~ ' I~~- a - I I 1 - - L J I I~-- 0 0 0 4'-5" ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ / i~ \ I ii ' ~ ~ - ~ - - ~ I W.H. - - - - - - EXISTING - 1 CORRIDOR i .1 ~ I ~ ~ III -6~ 8'-5N ~ ~ ~ BATH ( III I l 8'-5" v 8'-4" 6'-2" 12'-7" r .N .N ~ ~ 15 9" I, III I LiI i- -,=~1~~ I ~ „ , „ 1. ,i, ~ __ll I 0 x 68 ~ _ LS . I I I ~I~ I 68 ~ V EXISTING i ~ 1 , , ~ ~ I ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ GARAG E I ~ - - - - EXISTING II x x - - - 1 - BEDROOM II 0 0 ~ I 3'0"x 6'8" ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ I I~ , I C LST. I i 1 'i ~ I I CHECK OUT x 5'-1" I '-0" i ~ I I I ~ I ~ o ~ _ 5, 9" o I I - - 3 - - W.x WAITING zo SITING I I -----1 R 0 0 M II ~ ~OM a Z EXISTING o ~ ! ' Y ~ RELOCATED o o BEAK v , ELECTRICAL ~ LP,B ~ ~ ROOM II~ DINING NG _ EXISTI = o~ PANEL i I, ~ it ~ - ' ~ ~ ii KITCHEN p 8'-I1" 11'-10" 12'-0" EXISTING II ~I ~ ~ 9 VING 11 ~ - I it ~I I I I II! ~ II I I ~ ~ RECEPTION _T__ NEW COUNTER wo ~ _ I W/ UPPERS III I I I i~ I I ~ I I ~ I III I w x ' ' m III w x ~ AEDbWI Bout (WI e0ut> XISTING' ~ R MAIN t_ a B II II i i 1 I o I X~ EXISTING TO EXISTING TO 4 0x3'0 M I I I~~I__ _ I I II REMAIN REMAIN NEW ~ N ~ I I I I ° ~ ~ 00 M ENTRY I I I I I I I I i ; 6 ~ ~ I i F ~ _ - - - - I NOT1_.. ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - =f- ! 1, E,LL NEW DOOR AND WINDOW HEIGHTS TO MATCH EXISTING a ~ 0 ~ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ r co m a ~ro 3 ti ~ ~ N ti ° __ro 3 N ~ ~ ~o a ORIGINAL 8 ' N RECEIVED ~ ~ N MAC 13 2006 ~ PIA,NNINC DEPARTMENT ~ LO CITYOFCLEARWATER WALL LEGEND ~ i r EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN a L _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED r 8" CONCRETE MA50NARY UNIT W/ EXTERIOR FINISH PER EXTERIOR ~ DRAWN L~~~ ELEVATION, 4 JKE ` EDIT DATE 07-26-05 i,'~ 2°x4° WOOD STUDS AT 24" ON CENTER WITH 1/2° GYPSUM ~ ISSUE DATE BOARD EACH SIDE. PROVIDE DURA ROCK GYPSUM BOARD'' AT ALL WET LOCATIONS SCALE As Noted JOB N0. 05-HICKEY I 8 FILE NAME HICKEY DR OFFICE SHEET NAME 2 1 SHEET NUMBER EXISTING FLOOR PLAN A-1.0 RENOVATED FLOOR PLAN A.1,0 A_1"0 SCALE: iw•= r.w SME:114" = P-0" REVISIONS BY r NEW 40 YEAR DIM SHINGLE COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING CEMENT PLASTER TO BE PAINTED PORTER PAINT COLOR - 6892-1 ANTIQUE VELVET - - A I MATCH EXISTING 1-Y2"THKx4WIDE" DECORATIVE CEMENT . ~ PLASTER BANDING TO BE PANTED ~L ~ ~ PORTER PAINT COLOR 6891-1 NEWPORT TINT 1' ~ ~~a 1-Yz"THKx12WIDE" DECORATIVE CEMENT LL PLASTER BANDING TO BE PANTED PORTER PAINT COLOR 6891-1 ~ ri 't NEWPORT TINT ~ i~ ~~t ~C~~ FINISHED FLOOR MATCH EXISTING NEW ENTRY DOOR L IV~ MOTE: ~ 1. ALL NEW DOOR AND WINDOW HEIGHTS TO MATCH EXISTING V 2, VERIFY ALL FINISHES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3 1 0 SOUTH ELEV~ITION A-1.1 WEST ELEV~TIOId A_~,~ SCALE; 114" =1'-0' SCALE: U4" =1'-0" a 1~ ~ `r' o ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ a rn h 6 ~ tO ti .V M ti a ~ E N o yc ~ ro m 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ -o ~ co m~ ~ ~ ~ro 3 ti -o ~ - 4 ~ a 3 ~ ~ - - 3 r _ - - _ ~ ° 3 ~ •N r r ~ ~ r N r ? / r ~ r ~ r ~o ~ ~ ~ a r i r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r a ~ L b DRAWN ~ JKE ` EDIT DATE 07-26-05 ORIGINAL ~ ISSUE DATE RECEIVED ~ SCALE ~ As Noted MAC 13 2006 ~ ,ioe No. ~ 05-HICKEY i PLANNING DEPARTMENT I _ FILE NA -3 HICKEY OFFICE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHEET NAME 2 SHEET NUMBER NORTH ELEVATION A-1.1 EAST ELEVATION A.1.1 A-11 SCALE: 1/4" =1 '•0" e y e 16 EAST ~ N ~o~ N N t~ wll N D 0 z RIM¦31.58 U 0) ~ ~ 0) ' ~ ~ U 0 a 0- f~ ~ u m p SL S 3 FIR 5/8" v ' ~ o = ~ ; BAY LANE O Y N ~ry ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~ ~~1 U x CONC HEA~WALL gwau ~ a by bry kg r~ r~ INVr27.80,,p~ry 00 k BO ~ BO INV.¦28,28 ~~'A~e~ GRAPHIC SCALE ° z BO INV.¦28.28 ~ ~ s M,E,S, ry TOP 0 ANK ory ~ + ~ ~ 0~ . "~9~ 0 ~ 10 ' INV,¦ A,2T ~ 1~ INV, 27.72' 9 8 CMP 0 h 9 » X10 " ~ 20 0 10 20 40 d' M N G Z Q ~ 3 ry~1~ ~ xti~ SUOISIAB~ ~ U ~ f1R ~ 84 WOOD FENCE ry rye' _ $ 9 /8" y1~~ ~ ry0 16 FIR 1/2" (IN FEET) ° S89'27'5f; E 133E1,09 'S° M'ES ~ ,d + tJ~ 1 x ~ INV.¦28.34 ry 1 ~ 1y yryhk ~ ~ 5 2 CONC h 1 inch = 20 ft. NW COR ? S "P"•~ ry "A' SEPTIC TANK ~ W + I~R SEC 16-29-16 STO M MW +~t~ ~ t)S ~ 8 RIM¦30.41' + ~ ; ~S 8 PVC' INV. 5 25,99' 1 Y x k ~1 ~ r~ ~ ? 0 e ° INV. N)m25.84' ~ ryx~ ? x ' N ~ In c~ y INV. w~a2G,00' 18 29 16 OQODO 1210 D400 ; M ry C~'~~CONC ~ d WFJR(W)=28.83' / / ~ r / O D ~ ~ + Anthony R. & Ekaterina Damianakis e° A/p PkD ~ ob 90 00 12 ~ '`P' 2-STORY . , ;Y ~ t)5 ~ ~ W N . ,y~.. ry~• q0 1 WOOD FRAME ~ , x +~I'~ qy xp, ~ 9 ~ F.F. EL¦30,68' "P "P CONC ~ rye' ~ ~y ~.y 0 L~. O 16 6 1~ ~ ~ Yf' x ~ k $ ~ ? x X a k ~ 2x ry9 ,yp• 9 xry~ x~ 0 ~ WO N B ~ ti~.~ ry6 ~ °'hf0 yry g 'h^r' 1 x h ? WOOD I 20.00' Dry N I- Q 3 0° , k STAIRS 9• i•~ 6 TOP pF BA bti ~ 6ry ,5°;1 ~ N m ~ O ,~,6 N><,~o. • k9 ~ Mo CONC CON r~ tit ~ b M° N`'~• WOOD 0 M~ 0 2 ~ x r" ,50 p ^~1 ~ ~ h b?~ 6' WdOD ~ ~ SHED O s g~ 'h N ~ SHELL, "A' ~ ~ FENCE d~ 3 •y0 DRIVEWAY ~ x „ , R = mQ 3 FIR 1/2 ,ye< o S89 5G E 230,00 (D) MpNC { MpHOR Q. ~ Z ~ t SET PK & DISK ~ BENT X019 ° LA „ 9 EL¦3222' 2)13• FIR 5/Ei .yy k9 ~ LB 31389 v ' ~ x'~°• ti r r f ~^J h 50.OD (D) rn ory S~"4216E X90,22 (1V!) oPb ~ ~o°° ~9 Lo 3nas ~ x J ~ I ~ Q4 r ~ h° 6 wdoD ~ 2oWOl o~ ~,o~ .yo. ~ ] V . (a O FENCE ~ g0 N , BROKEN O ry9 ASPHALT z CONC, C7 2dKW „ ~RU~ CONC. ~Q ~ ~ ~ Y p DRlve g ~ DRIVEwAY za.oo' , 4 CI ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 16/29f1G%00000/210/0300 F" • oo ~o. ~yo~ •yo• ~yo'i .yo1 0,35 - Ernest A. & Chevy{ D. Lamoureux Fy ~ ~ a ~--a $ r. ,~gl V' M Q Q a cdrlc ~ ~ r ~ 21,00' x 9 ' Sa 4' TALL 0 0 ~ ~ COVERkp g (SEi'•ilL' TANK) X °1 5 O r~.,, C6 3ry 'S°' ~ t4 p1 1h CONC. ~ ky°• ,91 N N 'S ALUMINUld STORM INLET •y ~ •yo ~ L N k bg 0. 1 ,~~9 ~ ~ Q HANDRAIL h h~ RIM~30,58' 2.5' TALL 1 STORY °$0 gti 1 ,yo^ ~ •y1 ~ ~ C1 r19~9?' ~ INV,(N)=26,21' BRICK WALL 1'~ BLOCI( BLDG, o 1 PN~ ~ N O ,~1 g1 » ~ W M INV,(W =26,26' 'h° {107 ro 1 a SAM ryg. y~ f~/C U.D ~ SEE RETAIL 'A' n " 580' FF=31,G0' N ~0 " 2!) ° , ~ ~ ~ g 8 x ;1 ",20 ~ x y o;a ,y°• ;n n°y° ~ ~o CONC•J ~1 ~ D.1 ti' ~a as U ~ry 0 00 ~ ~f A/C PAD ~ ) 12.D0 M .y'~ h ,,1 1~ ,y"~ ,y0 O 0.16' 12.D0 M ~ ? '40.00' x~ waoD g ~•-•--------55,81 ~ .y~_.,...___._..~..~._......_~....._...83.9 ' .~..._...r sHCD WOOU $ SHED ai ~ y^y ~ p W ~ p 7- ' ~ 1~ Vg, 09 1 , O~y p '~y--0.17' ;i,N~U~ ?k _ 50.OD' D m>9. °oe ~o. ,o`'° w N84°A$'3t3~V 17A7~1' (M) r'h°^ 12 ga° •---0.17 c p ~ ~ ~i x ~o' „ N89'27'56"W 3D,00' D O FOF' 1 ~ ` FCM4X4 ( ) 9 o~ 1 X21 ~ ~ o o LS 2512 G' wddD ~y,, ,~•°g'Y ,y,, x~ x k.y0 ~ k.yo~ ~~g a FENCE X X cp ~ g I.ot 1 y;b k Q~0 by ~ cl-NM J p ' ~ e' waoo ENCF. 4J'~ ON+~12~ _ ry a ~ ~ ~ , ~1 ~ § BLOCK WALL Frank A. D Amico, Jr. Lat 2 Lot 3 11-- r a ~W~&~~ •h'~' ~ ° ~ z ohon a H. D'Amico Marion Thomson Jerzy & Alicja I(nczor ~ ~ J n aor U ~UUa ~~ti~ ~ g1ry F~~VOaN ~9 ,,n1 °5y eti , o1i FEATHERWOOD ~ ~ O p E'.,, . N • ory ~ ~ ~ PI t Book 105, Doge 28 pm~Q O ,rc . , N~~Oro~~ , ~ p h SCREENED-IN • UI LOZm~~t .1'~ o.1A~ '`~1 '~ry g"~ CONC POOL DECK x x x~ ~*a~,»~~`a ,,I y W~v~~v~~D~ r (jf r,~ ~ /j ~ E ~~,:ac 1 ~ 3~~ u ~ • ,f ' ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~rl~,N , 'v v,w'~',. ~ .~,o~,~ ~ ~ oAO ~ ar' a! sv`'~' ~ 'hy b ~ gyp. 1 x aywN a Q -S RY 1 TO ,~I CONC BLOCK 12 F.F. EL.¦3L3A U 1-STORY ' _ CONC BLOCK I ~ ' GARAGE F.F. EL¦31.32' I COVERED ~ ~ o CONC ~ o ~ ' ~ a ~ 1~ 'h 0 1y s ~ ~ In ~ 4 1_ fL~ ~ ~ s ~ i l ' ry ~ 1 ' ~ try ~lrry I~ ~ ~ Z CD k • 1 NOTES; Iii Q P 1. TYPE OF SURVEY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ~I Q~~ ~ g ~~'~13 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U M 1° ~ !fi ~ .yo ,y~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ x x w~~Y , 2. DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 22, 200;1. , ~~'i~~P~l~~1it a'lr~~.lirq.{;~+'0~3r:1~,'w ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~0 • LEQEND 0 1RAFFlC SIGNAL ACCESS BO% - - 6~ qy ~ Q1~ OAK TREE a o s o A L E p00 CLEANOUT "A1 '`A' ~ 3. SURVEY CREW: SCOTT WILLIAMS cnd FRANCISCO GARCIA ~ Z 1~ ® GAS METER PINE TREE 10 ~ ~ ? + ~ h'`x m Q 1Z' ® GAS VALVE ~k ~E , PALM TREE g SANITARY MANHOLE Q ~ L)' CONC 4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929, ~ ~ ~ W (N.G.V.D.) U~ W Q ?1~' OTHER TREE (AS LABELED) 6 G CREASE-TRAP MANHOLE ° ,y og DfiIVE O CONC ~ • Y J I Q BUSH © ELECTRIC MANHOLE DRIVE ~y' „ '`~1,1 ry ry ,~0 " • FIR 1/2 Kyo• ~ x ry1 FIR 1 2 , ' 5. REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS CITY OF OLEARWATER BENCHMARK N0. F-16, STAMPED: F-16, CITY OF CLEARWATER Q W U DISK, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF' CHESAPEAKE STREET AND BAYVIEW AVENUE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SCR 5END/2" CAPPED IRON ROD "LB 4513" Q STORM MANHOLE FCIR 1/Z" x x d` 9 FIR FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) ® WA VALVE PLS.4626 ?ry ~ . THE INTERSECTION, SOUTHEAST OF THE BACK OF CURB, WEST AND NORTH OF THE BACK OF THE INTERSECTION OF ~ ~ ~ 2f1. N FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD 517E NOTED) TER ® 0 g' FRR FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE ( ® RECLAIMED WATER VALVE 0g C 0 ry ry H TWO SIDEWALKS. ELEVATION = 29.53 ~ ~ ~ h9 0, 1y ~'h 9+ ry~0 ryp 09 PK PARKER KAYLON NAIL ® WATER METER BOX FCM FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT SIZE NOTED ® RECLAIMED WATER METER BOX ry`~ 0 !1~ ~ 1 '4~x ry FOP FOUND OPEN-ENDED IRON PIP SIZE NOT~D)) i~ ~ h FPP FOUND PINCHED-TOP IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTEd pG IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE ~ `~x h ( ) ~A~ 'A ' MAIL ~ MAILS REFERENCE BENCHMARK IS CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK N0. F-17, STAMPED: F-17, CITY OF CLEARWATER DISK, ~ ~ (n ~ LOCATED 200 FEET~NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DREW STREET AND BAYSHORE BOULEVARD, ON THE WEST SIDE ~ ~ ~ ~ FN&D FOUND NAIL ~ BRASS DISK r dor+~ FlRE HYDRANT ~1~n BOX BOX SNdtD SET NAIL IN BRASS DISC LB 4513 ~ LIGHT POLE WEST FA^E ® ,o OF BAYSHORE BOULEVARD, SET IN THE TOP OF A CONCRETE HEADWALL ~ ID IDENTIFlCATION ( ~ ~ !a', PLS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR !d WOOD UTILITY POLE r~ry ELEVATION = 4.97. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1y yq~ ~p 0 LB LICENSED BUSINESS CONC UTIUTY POLE ELEV,¦3058 rye' ry0, 3,25 ry ~ g 6. BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED BY CLIENT AND BASED ON SURVEY BY FIRST FINANCIAL SURVEYORS, JOB # UNKNOWN. ~ ~ I ~ D DESCRIPTION ~ TELEPHONE BO% 0g - F FIELD MEASURED ® CABLE N BOX ELEV,¦30.06 F- O.R, OFFldAL RECORDS BOOK SIGN ATTENUA110N » ry (A ( ) OPENII4G 0~ 6 - I~PF~ ~ - PG PAGE SPRINKLER HEAD ~y ¦ 9, 1 s _ _ _ ~ _ _ FEATIIER OOD DRIVE 7. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENT5 HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN. Q ~ ~ W PB PLAT BOOK o"D ROOF DRAIN 0.75 o:•r5' x ASPHALT PAVEMENT 8. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO ~ p E: cp CALCULATED FROM PLAT CALLS LANDSCAPING LIGHT E1.EV,¦29 2 8 ci CALCULATED FROM FIELD SURVEY ~ p 3 a IM•2a.o2 R UI ~ POB POINT OF BEGINNING GUY G DE WIRE SET PK dt DISK ~ ~ , THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. x,,49 B0~ M~ INV, N ¦24,58 o POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY V' ` P,U, PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT ~ (~NTERUNE ~ INV. S ¦24,82' 9. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT NOR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. ~ O Q. p, D.E, DRAINAGE EASEMENT INV. E)¦24.43' o, MH MANHOLE E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT m (U EL ELEVATION BOC BACK OF CURB INV, INVERT HWY HIGHWAY 10. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES SHOWN WERE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION CODE. M T,O,P. TOP OF PIPE BLVD BOULEVARD UG UNDERGROUND CONC CONCRETE ~cou ~couirr 11. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE AT THE RE-USERS SOLE RISK UU. UnuenunAin EM ELECTRIC METER WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. N MI.S, MITERED END SECTION ELECT N F.E.S. FLARED END SECTION CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE BWF BARBED WIRE FENCE I ERCP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WPF WOOD PLANK FENCE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE A/C AIR CONDITIONER 12. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE R.R. RAILROAD (3) PVC POL`VINYLCHLORIDE PIPE TOB TOP OF BANK 13. ONLY TREES FOUR (4) INCHES AND LARGER DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH) WERE W GTE GENERAL TELEPHONE AND ELECTRONICS TOS TOE OF SLOPE ZS TELE. TELEPHONE NO. NUMBER LOCATED AND SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. J ~ OHW AND/OR TELEPHONE SERI~CE E~SjON CIA, DIAM TER o F.O.C. FIBER-OPTIC CABLE U)